fine arts fiske kimball librari. a book of old english designs j. irving bbar general agent builders exch richmond, na j. trying beak general gents builders exchang richmona, ve new pork jacobson & company na . please return this book to art & achitecture library alfred e. hopkins, architect executed a y jacobson & co. new york city an old english ceiling from four feathers inn. a very charming interior showing one of the various uses of geometrical ceilings and hand-modeled antique wall surfaces. jacobson & co. plate iii le - hardwick hall — - - - per running foot, $ . jacobson & co. io plate v %, x u b % h.x " ht base - - - - per foot, $ . per foot, . - - - - per foot, . ii - - - - - - - - - - each, $ . each, . - - - - - each, $ . - - - - - each, . - - - - - each, . ii jacobson & co. plate vi v r eeslikud tottestet ona w krstonia sidebt x w - - - - per foot, $ . - - - - per foot, . - - - - each, . - - - - each, $ . - - - - each, . - - - - each, . - - - - per foot, $ . - - - - per foot, . - - - - per foot, . - - - - - - per foot, $ . - - per foot, . jacobson & co. . plate vii " „teb p. p ,, p. / " p. / " - - - - - - - - - - per foot, $ . - per foot, . per foot, . - - - - per foot, $ . - - - - per foot, . - - - - per foot, . - - - - per foot, $ . - - - - per foot, . - - - - per foot, . plate viii jacobson & co. er / " / " p. - - - - - - - - per foot, $ . - - per foot, . - - per foot, . per foot, . - - - - - - - - - - - - per foot, $ . - - per foot, . - - per foot, . - - per foot, . - - per foot, . . - - - - per foot, $ . - - - - per foot, . - - - - per foot, . - - - - per foot, . plate x jacobson & co. ves no - - - - per foot, $ . - - - - per foot, . ---- per foot, . - - - - per foot, $ . - - - - per foot, . - - - - per foot, . - - per foot, $ . - - - - per foot, . - - - - per foot, . plate xii · jacobson & co. a tof gtol mton a-f - each ornament, $ . g-l - each ornament, . - - - - - each, $ . - - - - - each, . m-n, ornament - each, . - - - - - - - - - - each, $ . each, . jacobson & co. plate xv x % . . x. x m x % Ü ) k a to e h w.at base tbase % % % x " - - - - each, $ . - - - - each, . - - - - each, . - - - - each, $ . - - - - each, . - - - - each, . - - - - each, $ . - - - - each, . a-e - - per sheet, $ . - - - - - each, . - - - - - each, . jacobson & co. plate xvi ... each, $ . • - - each, $ . ... cach, $ . ..each, $ . - ..- each, $ , - . - each, $ . - .... each, $ . jacobson & co. plate xxxiv xi diane diam a-h a-y is averce a-f a-f connect , a-h and a-f. a. for hunt a-y - - - - each, $ . a-h - - - - each, . - - - - - each, . a-f'. --- each, $ . - - - - - each, . a-f - - - - each, . jacobson & co. plate xxv gilling castle price on application عينيات ا | ) من) اما و ا خ s كالط شامل .(drn ammenta car\/unos - re لا - r o) m n a - الا ان الاproeessor pr . . - o) - forence . " . . - . - - -eo h poley & co pe shers . pos-now and new york الإإإإإإإإإإإإإإإإإإإإإإلا illnl, fnk .f " / • e. date due a collection of entail (carvin(gs اdrna w n atu re أf r (o) m by professor frullini of florence cgeo). h. polley &g (co). publishers boston and new york t he لفا i « ا v فرف ، ، س . ،، ، أنت vv مه : تيفي ar ثb إلا ا i . .------- .- -------- .. m .. ,co., publus hers غقّ george h. polley boston and n =w yorx. ---------------------------- . -------------------------- ------ ==- -------- ------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ - . تند :s:s: . - ---------------------- . - frieze with - - - .. -- -- ا . . - . . (game in bas-relief. the photographer ani) pot -- -- ------------ - :(. x . -------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- cons oie t abi e. .ersيرalusسg eorge h. pou l= x & co., p ، ا : ---------------------------- . ------------------- --------------- . . -------- ----- ----------- --------------- ------------------------ وج .- - - ,hersإgeorge h. polley % co., publus boston and new yorx. ---------------- ------------- --------- ------------------ ------------------------- .- ---------------------- ------------------- ----- -------------- . ----- ----------------------------- ------------------- -------- ------------- frieze with ( -{ ا ا ا . - . - . - . - - . ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------- ::::::::::::::::.. - % a -------- ا --------- - .- - - - - - - . -. -- - ------------------- ------------------------ ن ----------------عا لر. ----------------------- ----------------- -------- ----------- -------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- ---------------- مممممممممممم ----- "a - -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- غو . - - - - - . ,ers برausسg eorge h. polley & co., p . =p |جs oi pe: t apت ton) ا | ا fa harvard unesty werary exposiÇÃo retrospectiva de arte ornamental portugueza e hespanhola em lisboa cartas ao redactor do « correio da noite » por a. filippe simÕes com uma carta do sr. fernando palha ao auctor ácerca da collecção de ceramica lisboa typographia universal de thomaz quixtino antunes, impressor da casa real rua dos calafates, ar an anig een berada neste line o tometamante gathe m a kép bima exposicÃo retrospectiva de arte ornamental portugueza e hespanhola em lisboa cartas ao redactor do ( correio da noite » por a. filippe simÕes com uma carta do sr. fernando palha ao auctor acerca da collecção de ceramica . t eu lisboa typographia universal de thomaz quintino antunes, impressor da caja real rua dos calafates, fa . harvard college library from the library of fernando falha.. december , as salas a, c e h lisboa, de janeiro de . meu amigo. — pediu-me para escrever no correio da noite acerca da nossa exposição de arte orna- mental. prometti satisfazer ao pedido, dando aos seus leitores esclarecimentos, que até certo ponto suppram a falta do catalogo, ainda no prélo, e que não poderá estar concluido, senão passados muitos dias. o processo mais facil para organisar a exposição seria aquelle que o museu south kensington, de londres, adoptou, dispondo os exemplares por gru- pos, segundo as suas procedencias. a commissão executiva, a que tenho a honra de pertencer, en- tendeu porém que seria muito mais util fazer uma classificação racional, que permittisse agrupar os objectos, não pelas pessoas a quem pertencem, mas pelas suas naturaes analogias. e, assim, fazendo apenas justificaveis excepções com relação aquelles com que sua magestade el-rei o senhor d. luiz, sua magestade el-rei o senhor d. fernando e a sr.& con- eis aqui a parte mais numerosa e mais impor- tante da grande collecção de tecidos e bordados. infelizmente não encontramos em portugal exem- plares de épocas muito remotas. os mais antigos são dos fins do seculo xv, excepto um que apparece solitario, como um animal antidiluviano entre a fauna dos tempos modernos. É uma velha mitra ( ) de seda branca, bordada a oiro, do seculo xii, que foi encontrada com um baculo da mesma época, na egreja da ermida, perto de castro daire, n'uma gaveta de farrapos, que por esquecimento não ti- nham deitado ainda para o lixo. deve-se ao digno prelado da sé de lamego a indicação d’estas curio- sas antigualhas que, sem a exposição, de certo se perderiam. os exemplares dos seculos xv e xvi, principal- mente d’este ultimo, são muito notaveis. n'essa parle a exposição revela-nos maravilhas desconhe- cidas, e que de todo o ponto correspondem ao es- plendor da architectura, da pintura e da ourivesa- ria na mesma época. repare, meu amigo, nos bordados a oiro de grande relevo, nas orlas da capa de asperges ( ) da abbadessa de lorvão com os seus grandes ni- chos povoados de santas, nas bellas ramagens que cobrem um fragmento de velludo ( ) e um frontal ( ) da sé de coimbra, na casula e frontal da sé de braga ( e ) bordados a oiro, prata e coral, imagine ainda as pedras de côres, as perolas e al- jofares desapparecidos n’estas ultimas peças, at- tenda ao frontal ( ) do extincto convento de jesus de aveiro, com os seus grandes leões bordados a oiro em tela, e diga-me se toda esta brilhante e re- levada bordadura não corresponde em verdade aos cordões e laçarias das fachadas dos jeronymos ou de thomar, ou á complexa e profusa ornamentação dos grandes pratos doirados da sala de sua mages- tade el-rei d. fernando, ou da collecção geral da ourivesaria na sala da edade media e do seculo xvi! mas outros muitos exemplares corroboram com egual força a minha asserção. citarei apenas al- guns: - os bordados a oiro e matiz em alto relevo do convento da conceição de beja ( ); da sé ( ) e da egreja de santo antão ( ), de evora; os fron- taes de lorvão ( , e ) e de carnide ( ); as casulas e dalmaticas com orlas e sebastos orna- dos de imagens de santos ( ); a capa de asperges da egreja de belem ( ), com grandes bordados a oiro e matiz, que representam nossa senhora sen- tada n’uma cadeira e varios santos sobre o fundo de rico velludo lavrado, etc. fixado o typo geral dos bordados do seculo xvi, facilmente se discriminarão os anteriores. eis aqui uma casula unica no seu genero ( ), pertencente á sé de portalegre. É de velludo car- mezim com bordaduras de applicação de retroz de côres e fio de oíro em alto relevo, que represen- tam vasos, ramos, apjos, aguias com duas cabeças, flores de liz, etc. os sebastos, adornados com figu- ras de santos em baldaquinos acastellados, formam uma cruz, na qual foi bordada com maiores dimen- sões a imagem do crucificado, com um anjo de cada lado. todo o desenho é incorrectissimo, e poderia até attribuir-se a época mais remota, se não fosse a viveza das cores e a excellente conservação d'esta curiosa peça. os baldaquinos egualmente acastellados dos se- bastos das dalmaticas da egreja matriz de ponta delgada ( e ), similhantes aos da casula de por- talegre, porém menos imperfeitos, denotam ainda a grandes dimensões, não pode ficar todo patente. sobre um fundo de seda vermelha vèem-se, borda- dos a oiro e matiz, animaes phantasticos, ramagens e flores com bellissimo colorido. no centro um grande medalhão representa ganimedes arrebatado pela aguia ao olympo. com a grande revolução da renascença a mythologia entrava desassombrada- mente nos templos como nos poemas. os bordado- res acompanhavam os architectos, os esculptores e os poetas. não está porém aqui somente a analogia. no bor- dado de lorvão, a par com a mythologia, appare- cem bem patentes is influencias orientaes. o dese- nho de alguns ornatos, as formas de alguns animaes são asiaticas, tornando-se bem clara a similhança geral dos bordados com o de algumas colchas orien- taes expostas na mesma sala. já que fallei d'estes artefactos não devo deixar de apontar as bellas col- chas da egreja de belem ( ), dos srs. osborne de sampaio ( ), conde de redondo ( ), martinho montenegro ( ), marqueza da fronteira ( ), mar- quezes de monfalim ( ), viscondessa da fonte ar- cada ( ) e adriano de moraes pinto de almeida ( ). o estylo das colchas importadas do oriente imi- tava-se não somente n'outras obras congeneres, fa- bricadas na europa, mas tambem n'alguns para- mentos ecclesiasticos. entre outros da sala a, citarei a casula da egreja de miragaya do porto ( ). uma das obras de maior effeito é o panno de es- tante de velludo vermelho bordado a oiro ( ) do convento de santa clara de coimbra. o sceptro e corôa reaes, de correcto e elegante desenho, repetem- se em varias partes cercados de bellas ramagens. É tambem digna de menção, pela antiga passa- maneria de oiro, uma capa de asperges de velludo verde da sé de coimbra ( ). emfim, notam-se ainda, entre os bordados dos fins do seculo xvi ou dos principios do seculo xvii, um frontal da madre de deus ( ) de velludo carmezim com sebastos de relevo; uma casula de velludo carmezim com se- bastos bordados a oiro, com bellas figuras de santos, de uma egreja de ponta delgada ( ) com as armas de inglaterra, d'onde parece ter vindo para os açores; e um frontal de velludo carmezim bordado a oiro e prata, da mesma egreja ( ). das colchas de linho bordadas a seda da mesma epoca, mas sem caracter oriental, ha exemplares muito interessantes. a colcha do sr. vasco ferreira pinto basto ( ) é das melhores d'este genero. re- presenta batalhas, guerreiros e costumes da epoca. não tanto pela belleza da bordadura, como pela singularidade do assumpto, torna-se notavel a colcha do sr. antonio teixeira de sousa ( ), de lamego, na qual se vê a cidade de din, os seus baluartes designados com palavras portuguezas e guerreiros trajados e armados ao modo da epoca. as colchas de setim bordadas a matiz no seculo xvii ou xviii produzem um grande effeito. sirvam de exemplo as da sr.a d. guilhermina pereira ma- chado ( ), do porto e do sr. victor carlos sasseti ( ). outras ha, não menos bellas, bordadas somente a oiro, como a da sé de vizeu ( ) e a do sr. d. luiz de carvalho e lorena ( ). entre os paramentos mais admiraveis do seculo xviii notam-se uma casula de lhama verde bordada a oiro, da sé de lisboa ( ), uma grande capa de asperges ( ) com as armas do geral de santa cruz de coimbra, hoje pertencente á sé da mesma cidade, outra capa de asperges de tela escarlate bordada a oiro ( ) que faz parte do thesouro da capella de s. joão baptista de s. roque. outros bordados da mesma capella foram dispostos por outras salas. entre os bordados a matiz de melhor effeito ci- tarei finalmente um veu de hombros da egreja de santa justa de lisboa ( ), e uma casula ( ) da sr.a d. henriqueta gomes mora de araujo, de lis- boa. nas paredes da sala sobresaem seis quadros bor- dados a matiz com grande perfeição no seculo xvii ( , a, , , e ). representam assum- ptos historicos e pertencem á sr. d. maria de lemos e alvellos, do porto. além dos frontaes que em molduras doiradas es- tão por cima dos grandes armarios envidraçados, de alguns dos quaes já tive occasião de fallar, veem-se ainda varias tapeçarias interessantes. a mais notavel, pelas dimensões e pelo alto relevo de algu- mas das suas partes, é a que reveste o fundo da sala (b- ). representa grandes columnas salomo- nicas, vasos com flores, um veado, etc. pertence a secção hespanhola e diz-se ter sido da casa do conde duque de olivares. uma colcha, tambem hespa- nhola, de pellucia e com vivo colorido foi exposta pelo sr. visconde de monserrate. É da confraria da boa morte da sé de coimbra um bello tapete orien- tal, que adorna uma das paredes lateraes. na parede do fundo da sala a, aos lados do grande panno hespanhol; estão dois medalhões ( e ) que foram do pendão da inquisição de lis- boa. são bordados a oiro e torçal em alto relevo, e tanto um como o outro teem as armas d'aquelle, tribunal. pendão da inquisição de evora ( ) conser- vou-se inteiro. É de damasco escarlate, e tem de um lado as armas respectivas, e do outro a imagem de s. pedro martyr (pedro d'arbués), com esta le- genda : pro sancto munere martirii obtinere me- ruit palmam. foi collocado sobre a porta do fundo da sala. do mesmo lado, entre os frontaes collocados por cima dos armarios, está um bello quadro de tape- çaria de arras ( ) que representa o baptismo de christo. o desenho e o colorido assimelham-se extre- mamente aos das pinturas flamengas do seculo xv. era do extincto convento da madre de deus. a collecção dos trajos foi exposta nas salas a e c. interessantes para a historia do costume, não tem comtudo grande valor artistico. infelizmente raros serão anteriores a ; e só o podem ser dois fa- tos de homem ( e ), um do sr. osborne de sampaio, outro do sr. bento de queiroz. corres- pondem á época de luiz xiv em frança, de d. pe- dro ii ou d. joão v em portugal. outros fatos de homem, menos antigos, porém notaveis pelas bordaduras, foram expostos pela sr.a condessa da anadia ( , , e ). dos vestidos de damas o mais antigo pertence ao sr. ruy lopes de sousa, de santar ( ). É de lā de camello com barra bordada a matiz e vidros; e corresponde á primeira metade do seculo xviii. o sr. francisco ribeiro da cunha expõe um vestido de seda verde, com ramagens tecidas a matiz e prata ( ), e o sr. bento de queiroz, de vizeu, outro de tulle branca, bordada a palheta de prata ( ). estes ultimos são da segunda metade do se- culo passado. na sala c, não se admiram os esplendidos exem- plares do seculo xvi, são porém muito interessantes os dos seculos xvii e xviii, expostos nos armarios lateraes. na classe dos paramentos merecem particular menção uma casula de lhama branca, bordada a oiro e a matiz da sé de angra ( ); uma capa de as- perges de gorgorão carmezim, bordada a oiro, que do mosteiro de santa cruz de coimbra passou para a sé do porto ( ); uma casula de velludo branco quasi toda coberta de bordados de applicação, per- tencente ao sr. antonio de albuquerque, de vizeu ( ). esta peça, bem como as anteriores, é obra do seculo xvii e muito notavel pela belleza da bor- dadura a oiro e matiz, representando anjos, meda- lhões e ramagens de grande effeito. entre os paramentos do seculo xviii mencionarei uma casula, bordada a oiro e matiz, da egreja de s. domingos de lisboa ( ), e alguns dos frontaes que adornam as paredes por cima dos armarios. das colchas da sala c, as mais notaveis são uma de linho bordada a retroz de cores com figuras emblematicas dos cinco sentidos, designados com palavras portuguezas, bordadas tambem a retroz ( ). interessa-nos esta particularidade, como todas as provas de que quaesquer dos objectos expostos foram fabricados em portugal. a bordadura das colchas era de certo uma occupação predilecta das ricas ou nobres damas purtuguezas durante as horas que lhes deixavam livres outros lavores domesticos. a colcha que representa os cinco sentidos é do sr. bento de queiroz, de vizeu. n'estes trabalhos, re- vela-se em geral uma grande paciencia, ás vezes certo gosto na escolha das cores que formam o ma- tiz, mas quasi sempre a ignorancia do desenho. não se observa porém esta falta ein grande parte das colchas bordadas a oiro, trabalho que parece mais que simplesmente domestico e ter sido talvez desempenhado por artistas especiaes. tal é a colcha dos ( ); e finalmente as dos mantos de baptisado dos srs. marquez de penalva ( ) e conde de rio maior ( ). entre os bordados expostos mencionarei uma coberta ou toalha bordada á lacis do convento das chagas de lamego ( ) representando animaes de phantasia, e um vestido de filó bordado a prata do sr. bento de queiroz, de vizeu ( ), a quem perten- ce tambem um lenço de cambraia, bordado a cabello de differentes côres, imitando com perfeição uma aquarella. a grande collecção de tecidos e bordados conti- núa e termina na sala h, para o visitante; pois a sua verdadeira terminação, segundo o catalogo, é na sala c. o sr. julio cordeiro expõe dois bordados ( e ); um, o mais bello e mais antigo, representa a morte de nossa senhora; o outro a adoração dos magos. já vimos alguns dos bellos e ricos paramentos da capella de s. joão baptista, da egreja de s. roque, na sala a. na sala h estão expostos outros, que vem a ser dois reposteiros, dois frontaes, uma ca- sula e um véo de hombros ( , , , e ). do outro lado da sala estão alguns paramen- tos de seda bordados a torçal, de mafra ( , , , e ) uns e outros são obras italianas do seculo passado. tambem n’esta sala estão expostas muitas col- chas, sendo mais dignas de attenção as dos srs. con- des de prime, conde de mesquitella, ernesto do canto, tenreiro e osborne sampaio ( , , , e ). finalmente mencionarei um lindissimo baixo-relevo em marmore que está sobre uma mesa, e um meda- lhão della robbia suspenso da parede. o primeiro, uma das esculpturas mais notaveis do estylo da renas- cença que se conservam em portugal, veiu da casa da misericordia de vianna do alemtejo, o segundo, que tem a parte central de marmore e a moldura similhante ás dos outros, collocados em varias salas, procede do extincto convento da madre de deus. as duas vitrines da sala h e todos os objectos que ellas conteem, foram enviados pelo museu south kensington de londres para a exposição de arte or- namental em lisboa. este museu, que é um dos mais ricos da eu- ropa, especialmente em productos industriaes, pos- sue muitos exemplares das industrias hespanhola e portugueza. quando foi a londres o sr. sousa vi- terbo, para fazer conduzir os objectos que portu- gal mandou á exposição, promovida por aquelle mu- seu, e que deu origem á de lisboa, permittiram- lhe que escolhesse das collecções os exemplares que julgasse mais dignos de virem a portugal. são es- tes que hoje occupam as duas vitrines da sala h. o mais antigo é um cofre de marfim ( -- ), todo coberlo de ornatos em relevo, com a tampa á maneira de cupula, articulada com a parte restante por meio de longas e estreitas charneiras de bronze cinzelado e doirado. nos tres grandes medalhões que occupam a maior parte da superficie do cofre parece estarem representadas scenas da vida de um personagem, caçando, no primeiro; sentado n'um throno, no segundo; e finalmente viajando n'um pa- lanqué sobre um elephante, no terceiro. os espaços que separam os medalhões são intei- ramente cobertos de ornatos minuciosos represen- tando animaes de caça, aves, gryphos, flores, etc. a tampa, similhantemente ornada, tem na borda uma inscripção em caracteres cuficos, mutilada no principio por faltar um grande pedaço a esta parte do cofre : e prosperidade e felicidade para riaydh ben aflah capitÃo da guarda superior; isto foi feito no anno . este anno da hegira corresponde ao de christo de . este cofre do museu kensington, juntamente com outro muito similhante da sé de braga, exposto na sala m, e com os outros dois pertencentes aquelle museu, expostos na mesma vitrine da sala h ( , - , — :), constituem uma collecção interes- sante para o estudo da arte hispano-arabe dos se- culos x e xi. conserva-se na sé de pamplona outro cofre do mesmo genero. quem desejar fazer a comparação da arte maho- metana com a christã, na esculptura do marfim, n'esses tempos remotos, compare com os cofres ci- tados aquelle que na secção hespanhola é attribuido ao seculo x, e tambem o crucifixo de fernando o magno da mesma secção, obras de que hei de fallar n'uma das minhas cartas seguintes. essa comparação levará a attribuir á arte christã outro cofre de marfim do museu kensington, ex- posto na mesma vitrine, e attribuido ao seculo x ou xi ( — ). a ornamentação em baixo-relevo, re- presentando aves, quadrupedes e folhagens, asse- melha-se à do crucifixo citado, com quanto não seja tão perfeita e delicada. encontram-se pois na exposição seis exemplares interessantissimos para o estudo da arte da escul- ptura em marfim nas épocas em que é menos co- nhecida. o museu kensington expõe ainda um pequeno contador ( — ) e um cofre de marfim ( – ), attribuiveis á industria indiana dos seculos xvi e xvii, e outros dois cofres de madeira tambem indo portugueza, ambos do seculo svi. um, mais singelo, ( – ) tem uma grande aguia na tampa e outros ornatos em baixo-relevo nas quatro faces. o outro ( – ) é mais nota- vel pela minuciosidade e delicadeza dos ornatos que totalmente o revestem. na tampa estão representa- das muitas scenas da vida de christo. numerosis- simas figuras, algumas em alto-relevo, povoam os nichos ou ediculos ornados com arcos ou com outros elementos architectonicos ou esculpturaes do estylo indiano. emfim nota-se ainda na collecção dos cofres e caixas, uma forrada de couro estampado ( — ), obra hespanhola do seculo xvi, e producto de uma industria muito conhecida — a das cadeiras de sola. occupam a outra vitrine algumas obras da ouri- vesaria hespanhola e portugueza e um grande nu. mero de joias, interessantes pela sua belleza, anti- guidade e perfeita conservação. os fructeiros portuguezes ( — , - ), e como taes classificados no catalogo do museu ken- sington, são analogos aos que foram expostos em outras salas. uma pyxide de ( — ), e dois calices de e de ( — , – ), attribui- dos á industria hespanhola, são notavelmente infe- riores, como obras de arte, aos exemplares das col- lecções portuguezas. não está no mesmo caso o bello porta-paz do meiado do seculo xvi ( e ), comparavel, pelo desenho architectonico e pela perfeição do cinzel, a alguns dos que se expozeram nas salas me n. isto mesmo direi da placa dourada que parece lambem um porta-paz e que representa na parte inferior o presepe e na parte superior dois anjos. de maior preço ainda é o medalhão ( — ) com grotescos em relevo, no estylo de renascença. n’um prato de filigrana de prata ( - ), hes- panhol tambem, vê-se claramente a mesma indus- tria que produziu outros similhantes, expostos na sala f, por sua magestade el-rei o sr. d. fernando ou pela sr.a condessa d'edla, industria largamente influenciada pela arte mourisca das provincias me- ridionaes de hespanha. expõe finalmente o museu kensington uma grande e interessantissima collecção de joias fabricadas em hespanha, nos seculos xvi, xvii e xviii, entre as quaes avultam, pelo esmero, belleza e antiguidade, aquellas que pertenceram ao thesouro de nossa se- nhora do pilar de saragoça. n'alguns exemplares vê-se em execução o estylo dos desenhos de um in- teressante codigo da secção hespanhola, que contem esboços, feitos á penna, de muitas joias e obras de ourivesaria do seculo xvi. - ) ença. hes- s na ando ente ii me a sala b ande sem (secÇÃo hespanhola) ce as jade. . se tares ntem as de quem passar pela porta da sala c para a sala b, achar-se-ha de repente em hespanha, como se, com um passo apenas, transpozera a fronteira. a maior parte dos visitantes da exposição, des- lumbrados pelos reflexos metallicos, pelo brilho re- luzente das collecções portuguezas, não apreciam devidamente a secção dos nossos visinhos. todavia estão alli representadas as differentes civilisações que fazem da arte hespanhola um variegado matiz. obras wisigothicas, arabes, latino-byzantinas, ogi- vaes, mudejares, da renascença, dos dois ultimos seculos, em oiro, prata, bronze, latão, ferro, bar- ro, marfim, couro, lã, seda, pedra e madeira, obje- ctos do peru e do chili... é um verdadeiro cos- mos da arte. a hespanha, só a hespanha, poderia formar uma collecção assim, notavel pela variedade e importan- cia de tantos exemplares. eis aqui os braços de uma cruz wisigothica de oiro, adornada com pedras ( ), uma pequena parte do grande thesouro, achado ha uns trinta annos em guarrazar, perto de toledo, cujas esplendidas co- rôas e cruzes constituem hoje uma das collecções mais preciosas do museu de cluny em paris. junto d'aquella interessante reliquia da ourivesa- ria wisigothica do seculo vii, admiram-se no mes- mo estojo uma pulseira de oiro rebatido e um bra. celete do mesmo genero, ambos de estylo arabe e do seculo xiv ou xv. procede a primeira de mondu- jar da provincia de granada e o segundo de alme- ria ( e ). a ourivesaria mahometana é ainda representada por um cofre de prata do seculo xi, com inscripção de caracteres cuficos, procedente de santo isidoro de leão, e por outro cofre de prata com ornatos gravados e com inscripções cuficas de esmalte ne- gro, procedente da mesma egreja ( e ). são da arte christã, posterior á da época wisigo- thica, mas ainda com alguns vestigios de influencias arabes e byzantinas, um cofre de agatha e prata es- maltado de negro, em cuja ornamentação figuram algumas portas com arcos de volta de ferradura ( ), obra do seculo ix ou x, e o baculo do anti-papa d. pedro de luna ( ), obra do seculo xv, e muito similhante na forma da haste e nos lasangos que adornam o nó, a outros exemplares, contempora- neos, expostos na grande collecção da ourivesaria portugueza. não menos interessam ao estudo da arte algumas obras de metaes não preciosos. são do seculo xv as mais antigas: uma campa de bronze de castro ur- diales ( ), e um cofre com ornatos ogivaes ( ). a campa tem gravadas uma figura humana, varios ornatos de estylo ogival e a seguinte inscripção em caracteres gothicos: + aqui yace martin fernandes de las cortinas que finÓ el primer dia de marsco era de mccccix annos, aqui yace catalina lopes su muger que finÓ a ocho dias de mayo era de mccccxi annos, + aqui yace sos fijos lope fernandes, josepha fer- nandes, diogo fernandes, e a que dios perdone. em tudo se assemelha ás campas de bronze, me- nos antigas, que se conservam n'uma capella da egreja de s. joão evangelista, da casa de cadaval em evora, e que cobrem os restos mortaes de ruy de sousa e de sua mulher. são ainda do mesmo se- culo um thuribulo de alcalá de henares, attribuido ao cardeal cisneros ( ) e um cofre do ferro ex- posto pelo sr. d. ignacio daner, de madrid ( ). excepto este ultimo exemplar, todos os outros de que tenho fallado são expostos pelo museu archeo- logico de madrid. egualmente o são dois grandes candelabros de ferro rebatido, do seculo xvi, estylo da renascença ( e ). era d'este mesmo estylo, porém, muito mais perfeito, um altar ou capella de ferro que ha- via no claustro da sé de evora, e que, pelos annos de , pouco mais ou menos, foi desmanchado e vendido a peso. vi ainda algumas columnas com bellos medalhões, tropheus e outros ornatos, al- guns dourados. entre as obras de ferro da renascença distingue- se, pela sua bella ornamentação, um cofre, exposto pelo sr. d. mariano diaz del moral, de madrid ( ). de uma época posterior, já do seculo xvii, porém notavel ainda, pela belleza das formas e pela orna- mentação, é uma grande balança romana, exposta pelo museu archeologico de madrid ( ). d'esta clas- se mencionarei entre as obras da arte mahometana a grande lampada de bronze ( ), suspensa do cen- tro do tecto da sala, e que por assim dizer, por si só lhe imprime caracter. foi da mesquita da alham- bra, d'onde passou para a universidade complutense e d'ahi para a universidade central. É exposta pelo citado museu. a esculptura em marfim está representada por al- guns exemplares notaveis. bastaria, para honrar a exposição, o crucifixo de fernando magno ( ), ve- nerando monumento do seculo xi. a ornamentação de animaes e folhagens, caracteristica da época, é, relativamente, delicada e perfeita ; a imagem de christo, porém, imperfeitissima, bem revela o atrazo da estatuaria, de uma arte que nas cathe- draes se não differençava ainda do mister do can- teiro, ao mesmo tempo apparelhador de pedra e esculptor de estatuas. a imperfeição da estatuaria não podia ficar limitada ás obras de pedra, devia necessariamente abranger as de outras materias. na face anterior por cima do crucificado lè-se : ihe nazarenvs rex ivdeorvm; e no reverso; ferdinan- dvs rex sancia regine. consta de uma carta de doação de haver sido dado nesse anno com outras alfaias á egreja parochial de s. joão baptis- ta, hoje santo isidoro de leão. egualmente merecem especial menção um cofre attribuido ao seculo ix ( ), procedente de santo isidoro de leão, com figuras illustradas de legen- das em caracteres anteriores aos gothicos; um di- ptyco com os passos da vida de christo ( ), orna- dos de arcarias ogivaes do seculo xv; e finalmente, da arte mahometana, um cofre de madeira com em- butidos de marfim e ébano, em cujo desenho ama- dor de los rios viu reminiscencias da arte persa. ha na sala b uma parte muito curiosa e interes- sante, embora pouco agradavel aos olhos do visi- tante, que somente aprecia as coisas bonitas e re- luzentes. são os velhos fragmentos de madeira es- culpida, conservados á força de injecções anti-se- pticas, os grandes e pesados moveis, denegridos pelo tempo, e que, sem os processos chimicos, den- tro em pouco se desfariam em pó, corroidos e des- aggregados pela acção destruidora do caruncho. na impossibilidade de transportar para uma ex- posição distante as grandes estatuas, os pesados baixo-relevos de pedra, os volumosos fragmentos architectonicos, estes exemplares de madeira, en. viados de hespanha, mostram-nos os varios gene- ros e phases da esculptura hespanhola, e as suas feições caracteristicas relativamente ás épocas e ás civilisações que os produziram. os fragmentos mais antigos são do seculo x e procedem da mesquita de cordova ( ). seguem-se depois os fragmentos de sóccos e de frizos dos es- tylos mudejar e granadino dos seculos xiii, xiv e xv, um pulpito de s. marcos de leão ( ), com esculpturas ogivaes do seculo xv, as grandes arcas do mesmo estylo e época ( e ), tambem de leão, e finalmente outras duas arcas de menores di- mensões, porém muito mais elegantes, com gran. des relevos do estylo da renascença, obras do se- culo xvi ( e ). todos estes exemplares são expostos pelo museu archeologico. as armas e armaduras da secção hespanhola, com quanto interessantes, não causarão admiração a quem tiver visto as ricas e numerosas collecções de madrid. augmenta-lhes, porém, o interesse a po- breza da nossa exposição n’este genero. das obras de arte que teem desapparecido de portugal, ne- nhumas parece terem sido votadas a tão completo exterminio como as armas e armaduras. bastará di- pada borda anche a tu zer que os membros da commissão executiva que percorreram lisboa e as provincias em busca de exemplares para a exposição, apenas obtiveram uma armadura completa, pertencente a sua magestade el-rei d. luiz. peças cinzeladas de lavor nota vel tambem somente sua magestade el-rei as expoz. a armaria real de madrid expõe uma meia armadura com uma rodela ( ), que pertenceu a el-rei d. fi- lippe ili. outras duas de menor estatura, que fo- ram do mesmo rei emquanto principe, e do prin- cipe d. carlos ( e ), e doze espingardas e arcabuzes, obras do seculo passado, com os nomes dos fabricantes ( a ). o museu archeologico expõe duas adargas de coiro, bordadas a prata e seda ( e ), duas espadas castelhanas, uma do seculo xvi, outra do seculo xvii ( e ), uma espada granadina, com punho de cobre esmaltado ( ), do seculo xiv, e, finalmente, um par de estribos cinzelados e doira- dos que pertenceram ao imperador carlos v ( e ). o sr. conde de valencia de d. juan expõe um par de estribos arabes, de ferro, adamascados de prata, com adornos rebatidos de prata e alguns es- maltes ( e ). a ceramica representa talvez a parte mais cara- cteristica e mais caracterisada de toda a sala b. logo no centro, por baixo da grande lampada de bronze, ergue-se um grande jarrão esmaltado de azul e com reflexos metalicos ( ), attribuido á arte granadina do seculo xiv. uma inscripção esmaltada confirma a deducção tirada dos caracteres do tra- balho. . além d'esta curiosa antigualha, o museu archeo- logico nacional expõe trinta e cinco pratos, uns his- pano-arabes, pela maior parte de grande preço, pela finalmente, utenceram ao impera d. juan expo de na code bueno urbin sua belleza e raridade, outros de fabricas hespanho- las, todos interessantes ao estudo da arte da cera- mica na peninsula. expõe mais um grande numero de outros objectos de ornato ou de uso domestico, entre os quaes se notam os hispano-arabes, as bel- las majolicas de urbino e os elegantes grupos da fabrica de buen-retiro. na collecção dos esmaltes figuram dois relicarios de cobre esmaltado de limoges, do seculo xu ( e ), procedentes de s. marcos de leão, simi- lhantes aos da sé de vizeu, expostos na grande collecção da ourivesaria portugueza, porém mais singelos e de menores dimensões. são expostos pelo museu archeologico, bem como duas bacias do se- culo xili, ( e ) quatro esmaltes com assumptos religiosos ( e ), que dizem ter sido fabrica- dos em aragão no seculo xv, á imitação dos de li- moges, porém menos perfeitos, e finalmente dois quadros com peanhas e molduras de ebano, con- tendo esmaltes em negro de limoges, do seculo xvi ( e ). o sr. rodrigues seoane expõe um pequeno es- malte representando a magdalena, do seculo xvii ( ), e em tudo egual a outro do museu portuense, que figura na grande collecção da ourivesaria por- tugueza, na mesa central da sala m. uma descripção dos tecidos e bordados, conforme à sua importancia, não cabe ncs estreitos limites d'esta carta. mencionarei um bordado do seculo xiii ( ), que representa scenas da vida de nossa se- nhora, exposto pelo sr. conde de valencia de d. juan, que expoz tambem tres curiosas collecções de passa- inaneria hespanhola ( , e ); mencionarei tambem as capas bordadas do palacio real e do museu archeologico, a primeira do seculo xvi, a se- gunda do seculo xiv ( e ). das tapeçarias merecem especial menção aquella de que já fallei na minha primeira carta, exposta na sala a, e outras duas similhantes expostas na sala n, que dizem ter sido da casa do conde-duque de olivares; outras da fabrica de madrid, que representam d. quixote (exposta na sala n) e desenhos de d. luiz wanloo, d. ramon bayeu e d. francisco goya, todas nota- veis pela viveza do colorido. os tres primeiros, do conde-duque de olivares, são expostos pelo museu archeologico, os outros pelo palacio real. o museu archeologico de madrid expõe, final- mente, interessantes e copiosas collecções de ar- mas prehistoricas de pedra e de cobre da america : de vasos peruanos e de vasos de bronze chinezes, pertencentes à secção ethnographica do mesmo mu- seu. iii a sala f (collecÇÃo de sua magestade el-rei o senhor d. fernando e da ex.ma senhora condessa d'edla) entremos agora na sala f, uma das mais ricas da exposição, pelas preciosidades que contém, a mais bella de todas, pelo gosto com que foi ele- gantemente disposta. n'este encantador recinto, onde com razão se de- leitam e extasiam os visitantes, patenteia-se o sen- timento esthetico do apaixonado cultor da arte, o gosto apurado das suas mais bellas manifestações, os conhecimentos artisticos, adquiridos pela obser- vação e pelo estudo no espaço de muitos annos. não se nota alli um só objecto que pareça de mais ou deslocado, um logar vazio que devesse ser preenchido, uma discordancia de fórmas ou de cô- res. todas as coisas estão harmonicamente dispos- tas em relação não somente de umas para com ou- tras, mas tambem de todas para com a sala a que servem de ornamento. das numerosas e interessantissimas obras de ou- rivesaria, expostas por sua magestade, prendem mais em particular a attenção os grandes pratos e gomis de prata dourada, tanto por suas grandes dimensões, como pela profusão, variedade e relevo dos ornatos. as palavras portuguezas, gravadas em alguns, a preferencia de certos assumptos, o estylo que se differença, por feições particulares e proeminentes, dos outros conhecidos da ourivesaria estrangeira, contemporanea, fazem com bom fundamento attri- buir estas e outras obras congeneres a ourives por- tuguezes do seculo xvi, aquelles ourivezes que o bom do chronista de el-rei d. joão i dizia estarem no cume, ao tempo em que escrevia a sua miscel- lanea. entre, meu amigo, na sala m, examine os gran- des exemplares da ourivesaria religiosa alli expos- tos, e diga-me se, plausivelmente, se pode contes- tar a existencia de um estylo nacional, proprio do seculo xvi, e gerado e desenvolvido nas mesmas condições que produziram a architectura denominada manuelina. na ourivesaria, porém, o estylo affirmou- se, individualisou-se mais que na architectura. pa- rece que o genio dos artistas, menos ligado á ob- servancia das regras estabelecidas e á imitação dos modelos, podia expandir-se mais livremente em criações tão imaginosas como originaes. a profusão de ornatos e de figuras que se entre- laçam e atropellam, que não destacam bem umas das outras, pela falta de vazios intercallares, a fór- ma convencional das arvores, a imaginosa e exage- rada phantasia dos monstros e chymeras caracteri- sam estas obras notaveis da ourivesaria portugueza na primeira metade do seculo xvi. os tres grandes pratos e um dos dois gomis, expostos por sua magestade el-rei d. fernando, são os exemplares em que melhor se desenha o estylo portuguez. a primeira impressão, ao contemplar uma d'es- tas obras, é confusa e vaga. depois à vista começa a distinguir as particularidades do intrincado con- juncto : anjos, patriarchas, guerreiros a pé e a ca- vallo, reis, chymeras, tendas, castellos artilhados e guarnecidos de mosquetes, escadas de assalto, car- ros com provisões de guerra, luctas, caçadas, ar- vores, ramagens, ornatos de toda a especie. as vezes o mar povoado de galeões e monstros marinhos; deuses fabulosos e santos do calendario romano; a par com a mythologia o christianismo; juntamente com os medalhões da renascença os ve- lhos ornatos gothicos. É a historia da época, escri- pta no metal, são as ideas que inspiraram camões influindo da mesma sorte na imaginação dos artistas. com effeito, que imaginação fecunda se não pa- tenteia n’um dos gomis ! as figuras do bico e da aza parece excederem os maiores devaneios da phan- tasia humana. uma mulher, com pernas de abutre e com uma carranca no ventre, agarra sobre o peito as pernas caprinas de um satyro que se esforça por trepar pelo corpo do bico. a ponta, á maneira de gargula, é abraçada na face inferior por uma figura humana e cavalgada na parte superior por outra, que, ao mesmo tempo, agarra os braços da primeira e lhe finca os pés no peito. a aza, do lado opposto, compõe-se de figuras de não menos imaginosa phantasia. as pernas de umas engancham-se com os braços de outras ; duas acos- tam-se em direcções inversas. um grande basilisco de azas abertas e bocca escancarada está como que defendendo a ascensão da cadeia humana. para os portuguezes do seculo. xvi viver era lu- ctar, luctar com o oceano, com as tempestades, com os homens, com os animaes. a lucta, portanto, a feição proeminente dos costumes, tornava-se o as- sumpto predilecto dos artistas. a par com o prato e gomil ( e ) de que te- nho fallado estão do outro lado, sobre o mesmo fo- gão, outro prato e gomil de estylo italiano ( e ). estas obras, da mesma época ou pouco poste- riores, fazem com as primeiras notavel contraste, e servem muito bem para patentear com toda a cla- reza as differenças caracteristicas do estylo portu- guez. os ornatos de pura renascença não teem nada da accumulação que se observa nos pratos portu- guezes, antes se destacam graciosamente nos gran- des fundos lisos que os separam. finalmente a phantasia não ultrapassa os limites marcados pela arte classica. - a comparação d’estas obras differentes vale por si só uma lição de bellas artes. os grandes pratos e gomis são os exemplares em que mais claramente se desenha o estylo da ourive- saria portugueza na primeira metade do seculo xvi. todavia offerecem-nos ainda interesse, como repre- sentantes d'este mesmo estylo, outras obras de me- nores dimensões e de menos complexa ornamenta- ção, expostas por sua magestade na sala f. eis aqui tres fructeiros de prata doirada tendo todos por medalhões centraes o mesmo brazão dos sousas, encimado pela corôa de marquez. o dese- nho e o relevo assimelham-se aos dos grandes pra- tos. notam-se n'um d'elles galeões de fórmas ca- prichosas; n'outro sobresaem mais os ornatos da renascença, modificando já o estylo com a sua fei- ção proeminente e caracteristica. patenteia-se ainda melhor a similhança com os grandes pratos n'outro fructeiro de prata doirada, maior que os tres mencionados, com a forma quasi da bacia, orla rendilhada e brazão prelaticio no cen- tro. o estylo, porém, modificou-se cada vez mais, transformado pelas influencias irresistiveis da re- nascença. differe muito das obras anteriores uma salva com brazão prelaticio no centro, e uns gran- des bustos de homem e de mulher. a data de , gravada n’esta salva explica-nos a differença. fallando da ourivesaria portugueza da primeira metade do seculo xvi, exposta na sala f, não devo deixar de mencionar uma bella caldeirinha de prata doirada com grandes medalhões e ornatos de phan- tasia. lembra-se, meu amigo, de que foi pela compa- ração das obras italianas com as portuguezas que melhor cheguei a evidenciar a originalidade do es- tylo nacional. podemos repetir agora con, egual re- sultado o mesmo processo. juntamente com os exem- plares a que me tenho hoje referido está um bello medalhão de prata doirada, de puro estylo gothico, obra allemã dos fins do seculo xv. representa nossa senhora com o menino, s. paulo, s. jeronymo e um outro doutor da egreja, de joelhos, em adora- ção e parece ter servido de fecho a uma capa pre- laticia. a leve e graciosa architectura, a elegancia do de- senho, a delicadeza do cinzelado, mostram-nos dif- ferenças profundas entre este exemplar e os outros da mesma sala, e mais ainda se o compararmos com. as obras congeneres da arte religiosa, expostas na sala m. sua magestade el-rei d. fernando expõe ainda outros exemplares interessantes de ourivesaria. taes são duas pulseiras de oiro celticas; dois calices de prata doirada do seculo xvi; duas grandes coroas, uma de prata branca, outra de prata doirada, e dois fructeiros pequenos, obra portugueza do se- culo xvi, um de prata doirada, outro de prata branca e doirada. são ambos ornados de segmen- tos esphericos, uns simples, outros compostos de segmentos menores, imitando o granuloso da amora. relacionam-se naturalmente con estes exemplares outros dois, expostos um na sala g pelo museu kensington, outro na sala g pelo sr. manuel ba- rata de lima tovar, e finalmente uma salva do sr. d. luiz de carvalho daun e lorena. esta ul- tima não tem segmentos esphericos, mas pequenas pyramides de base quadrangular. todas estas obras são attribuiveis ao seculo xvi. a sr.a condessa d'edla expõe tambem na sala f alguns exemplares interessantes de ourivesaria. taes são um dos fructeiros, a que já me referi, com obrazão dos sousas no centro, uma imagem de nossa senhora e dois anjos em alto relevo, obras portuguezas do seculo xvi, uma sacra de prata, ca- racteristicamente portugueza, e alguns fructeiros de prata branca, do seculo xvii. entre estes ultimos ci- tarei dois com a forma de bacia, sendo um d'elles adornado com um busto de mulher doirado no me- dalhão central, e com a seguinte legenda em roda: anna mavr ella oldofredi d. ise. Æt. x. o resto ficou encoberto com o busto. são ambos extrema- mente similhantes a outros dois expostos na sala n, um dos quaes tem por medalhão central a effigie de : filippe in de hespanha, pela qual se determinaria a época, se ella não estivesse claramente indicada na ornamentação. os fructeiros mais elegantes expostos pela sr.a con- dessa estão n'uma das vitrines sextavadas. as alle- gorias das quatro partes do mundo, que adornam em baixo-relevo os centros e as largas cercaduras de ramagem, denunciam a industria franceza do se- culo xvii. os fructeiros de prata branca e dois pratos de filigrana de prata de cordova, expostos por sua ma- gestade, fazem realçar no grande armario de car- valho, pelo contraste das cores, os objectos de prata doirada. os esmaltes de limoges, em que a exposição é riquissima, estão tambem superiormente represen- tados na sala f. os mais antigos são uma collecção de doze com outros tantos passos da vida de christo, formando um triptyco ( ). representa a flagella- ção, outro, do seculo xvi ( ), comparavel, pela bel- leza do colorido, ao grande esmalte da bibliotheca de evora, exposto na sala m. É obra de joão péni- caud. finalmente outro pequeno esmalte, com mol- dura, parece representar a princeza margarida de saboya ( ). antes de me referir a outras obras de esculptura, direi algumas palavras acerca dos moveis ornados com obra de talha. como se prova pelos innumeros retabulos das egrejas e conventos, teve esta arte um grande des- envolvimento nos seculos xvii e xviii, e houve até artistas notaveis que trabalharam com grande per- feição. todavia os exemplares expostos nas outras salas são poucos para convenientemente represen- tarem este grande ramo de industria nacional. re- nencia das suas folhagens e fructos de cores verde e amarella. as duas estatuetas, a que já me referi, represen- tando santos em adoração, pertencem ao mesmo genero com a imagem da virgem que lhes serve de centro, e que não foi exposta. pertencem á sr.a condessa d'edla, que os adquiriu na italia. dos seculos xvii e xviii estão na sala f alguns pratos e talhas de talavera e de alcora, ornados com scenas de costumes e outras pinturas. no bojo de uma talha de talavera vê-se uma estudantina, tal qual é ainda hoje. . interessam-nos, porem, mais que tudo, as obras da fabrica do rato: espelho, as bailarinas, o busto da rainha d. maria , algumas das quaes são expos- tas pela sr.a condessa d'edla. ao espirito occorre perguntar, porque se não faz hoje o que em cera- mica se fazia ha mais de um seculo. alguns quadros gothicos e de épocas posteriores adornam a sala f. a primeira vista contam-se tam- bem como pinturas dois bellos mosaicos romanos do seculo passado, um dos quaes representa o ecce homo, e outro nossa senhora, ambos com ricas molduras doiradas. assimelham-se no estylo e na perfeição aquelles que se admiram na capella de s. joão baptista da egreja de s. roque. sobre o centro de nogueira, no meio da sala, es- tão joias e objectos de menores dimensões. perten- cem á sr.a condessa d'edla uma rica e numerosa collecção de caixas de rapé e algumas joias nota- veis. levar-me-ia muito tempo descrever todos estes objectos, que tanto attraem os olhos dos visitantes e particularmente das damas que se demoram n'esta sala. não deixarei, porém, de fazer menção de um grande collar de ambar e de filigrana de oiro, obra indo-portugueza dos fins do seculo xvi e de alguns vidros expostos no mesmo logar por sua magestade el-rei d. fernando. iv . a sala g (as vitrines de sua magestade el-rei o senhor d. luiz) lisboa, de fevereiro de . ao entrar na sala g deparam-se-nos logo as duas vitrines de sua magestade el-rei o senhor d. luiz. não é muito numerosa esta collecção; compre- hende apenas sessenta e nove objectos; mas ha en- tre elles alguns extremamente importantes. taes são duas torques ou collares de oiro, celti- cos, achados, ha alguns annos, perto de vizeu. con- temporaneos, talvez, da denominada cava de viriato, assimelham-se a outras torques que se teem desco- berto na galliza; bem como aquelle monumento pa- rece tambem corresponder aos antigos castros gal- legos. merece particular attenção a cruz de oiro de d. sancho . faz lembrar, sobretudo pelas finas pedras que a adornam, as joias wisigothicas do thesouro de guarrazar, não obstante os seis secu- los que as separam. todavia a forma e o desenho . dos ornatos são do seculo xii, que, dominado ainda pelas influencias byzantinas, se differença profunda- mente da antiga arte wisigothica, byzantina tam- bem, mas de outro modo caracterisada n’aquella época remota. a data da cruz de d. sancho está na seguinte inscripção, que darei aqui sem as abre- viaturas : dominus sancius rex jussit fieri hanc crucem ano incarnationis mccxiiii. adornam a face principal d'esta cruz muitos aljo. fares, saphiras e rubis, finos arabescos gravados sobre o oiro com guarnecimentos de filigrana. al- gumas das pedras estão marcadas com siglas. a base tem a forma de esphera achatada, tambem co- berta de ornatos de filigrana. os ornatos da face posterior são todos gravados a buril; no centro o agnus dei; nas extremidades da haste e dos braços o anjo e os animaes emble- maticos dos evangelistas, cujo desenho apresenta as fórmas elegantes e phantasiosas da esculptura orna- mental christã do seculo xii: na haste a inscripção já transcripta, cuja data foi gravada n’uma fita que o anjo de s. mattheus sustenta nas mãos. el-rei d. sancho i legou em seu testamento ao mosteiro de santa cruz de coimbra o oiro para esta obra notavel. entre esta cruz e outra de que mais adiante fal- larei está a custodia de belem, o mais admiravel dos monumentos da ourivesaria portugueza. em ne- nhuma outra obra d'este genero se reproduziu com tanto primor a phantasia, o arrojo, a esbelta ele- gancia e maravilhosa delicadeza do estylo ogival, pela difficuldade de reduzir no ouro ou na prata as fórmas dos elementos architectonicos das grandes ca- thedraes de pedra. o auctor da custodia de belem fez este milagre da arte, e deu á sua obra uma apparencia verda- deiramente phantastica e maravilhosa. o genio na- cional, as ideas que exaltavam o caracter portuguez no seculo xvi, as inspirações que os artistas rece- biam do oriente patenteiam-se na obra de gil vi- cente, como em thomar, em belem, ou nos lusia- das. compõe-se a custodia de quatro partes : base, haste, relicario e cupula. no bordo inferior da base lè-se o seguinte em caracteres de esmalte branco: o muito alto prin- cipe e poderoso senhor rei dom manoel i a man- dov fazer do ovro i das parias de quiloa aquabov e cccccvi. a superficie da base é distribuida em seis gomos adornados com aves, buzios e flores esmaltadas e em alto relevo. formam a haste dois corpos hexagonos, fenestra- dos, ligados pelo nó tambem hexagono, muito vo- lumoso e proeminente; em cada uma das seis fa- ces, entre dois columnellos, a esphera armillar. es- tes columnellos são uma transformação ou derivação das torrinhas que adornam as partes corresponden- tes de algumas alfaias do seculo xv, como se pode vêr nos exemplares expostos na sala m. sobre a haste ergue-se o grande corpo archite- ctonico que contém o relicario, e cuja base é, na face inferior, adornada de rendilhados e de festões. doze modilhões de forma pyramidal, com os ver- tices para baixo, guarnecem adiante e atraz a cir- cumferencia da base. sobre cada um d'elles, n'um plintho hexagono, está de joelhos a estatueta de um apostolo. querendo evitar a monotonia que offereceriam doze figuras de joelhos, o artista variou por extremo as fórmas, as côres e os pannejamentos das vestes, e tambem as cabeças, fazendo umas calvas, outras com cabellos, doirados todos, mas diversamente an- nellados. sobre a base do relicario erguem-se duas colum- nas quadrangulares, entre as quaes está fixada a caixa circular com vidros para conter a hostia. exteriormente reveste cada uma das columnas um corpo de grande altura, formado de peças de- licadissimas. em baixo nichos com anjos cobertos com baldaquinos, sobre os quaes se levantam altos columnellos, ornados de espiraes e sustendo outros anjos e baldaquinos. os ornatos cada vez se tornam mais delicados, de baixo para cima, até chegarem a parecer quasi microscopicos. a cupula articula-se com a columnas e corpos lateraes, baixando na parte media até ao nivel su- perior do hostiario, ao qual forma uma como coroa, guarnecida de rendilhados e ornada com seis sera- phins n'outros tantos medalhões. a cupula propriamente dita, que se eleva acima d'esta especie de corôa, compõe-se de tres corpos de arcarias, rendilhados, anjos e baldaquinos, liga- dos entre si por columnellos enciinados por coru- cheus. por baixo do corpo superior está o busto do padre eterno, coroado, com a esphera do mundo e a cruz n’uma das mãos, e abençoando com a outra. uma cruz serve de remate superior a toda a obra. esta custodia e a cruz de d. sancho i foram re- colhidas, em , com as alfaias de oiro e prata dos conventos á casa da moeda. d'aqui passaram mais tarde para a casa real em troca de outros ob- jectos, pertencentes á corôa, que n'aquella casa ha- viam sido fundidos. sua magestade el-rei o senhor d. luiz expoz tam- os do barco, ao mesmo tempo que uma d'ellas resiste contra um outro demonio que lhe lança as garras. no quadro seguinte estão n'um logar alto, junto das muralhas de uma fortaleza, tres cavalleiros, con- tra os quaes parece virem outros, e entre elles um rei; outro rei, atravessado por uma espada, é pre- cipitado para o terreno mais baixo, por onde os ul- timos avançam. no immediato representa-se uma grande carnifi- cina. em frente das tendas de um arraial homens armados de espadas degolam ou atravessain outros, alguns dos quaes jazem prostrados em terra. no immediato um rei seguido de outros homens, um dos quaes está de joelhos em terra, assiste ao desmoronamento de uma fortaleza. o seguinte representa tres homens presos, indo adiante dois alabardeiros e atraz um cavalleiro.. depois um papa, acolytado por dois bispos, ba- ptisa um rei. na terceira zona, ou exterior, dois galeões com velas latinas, levando as do primeiro a cruz de christo, seguidos por um barco menor com vela triangular, navegam pelo mar encapellado; deixando atraz a terra coberta de arvoredo, e mais ao longe uma fortaleza. num outro quadro um rei a cavallo, precedido de dois alabardeiros de pé e seguido de cavalleiros, deixando atraz as tendas de um arraial, approxi- ma-se de umas muralhas ameiadas, de cima das quaes dois homens parece fallarem para baixo. outro representa uma viagem de cavalleiros. junto de um bosque alguns homens enchem de agua, que tiram com cantaros do chão, as vasilhas que um ca- vallo transporta. ao longe seguem uma estrada, na maior altura, alguns camellos. outro representa um combate. alguns cavalleiros e cavallos jazem por terra. n'outro dois homens entram n'uma casa, onde, sobre um estrado, algumas mulheres lhe saem ao encontro. a principal é precedida por outra que traz uma creança n'uma bandeja. algumas outras, atraz, estão sentadas. mais atraz, junto de uma chaminé, outra mulher assa carne n'um espeto em frente do fogo. no immediato alguns homens, sobre um caes, junto de um bosque, assistem á partida de um ou- tro, que n'um batel, com um rèmador, segue para um galeão pouco distante. outro representa o encontro de quatro cavallei- ros que se cumprimentam tirando os chapéos, e de uma e de outra parte precedidos por homens de pe e de cavallo. n'outro, finalmente, um rei parece enfermar ou agonisar n'um leito. ao lado um papa está para lan- çar-lhe em cima um lençol ou coberta. mulheres e homens de joelhos, um d'elles com um brandão acceso, os outros, de mãos postas, as- sistem a este espectaculo. taes são as scenas representadas no grande prato de prata doirada de sua magestade el-rei o senhor d. luiz. É possivel que a ordem natural dos qua- dros seja outra, mas nem por isso deixará de ter interesse a descripção de cada um d'elles, afim de dar idéa d'este estylo singular. no centro houve de certo um brazão, hoje sub- stituido por um medalhão, representando em baixo- relevo um combate de cavalleiros. a par com estas obras de ourivesaria nacional expõe sua magestade outras de estylo mui diffe- rente. taes são tres grandes pratos de prata doi- gem de christo resuscitado. os paineis representam em baixo-relevo, adiante o enterro, atraz o calvario, de um lado a crucifixão, do outro o descimento da cruz. são do mesmo estylo da renascença e do mesmo seculo xvi, porém obra italiana, uma gorgeira e um peito de armadura, ornados de bellos baixo-relevos, que representam assumptos guerreiros. attribuem- se a francisco i. a sua magestade a rainha a senhora d. maria pia pertencem tres joias de grande preço, expostas n'uma das vitrines: uma cruz de oiro esmaltado, ornada de perolas e esmeraldas; um pingente de oiro esmaltado representando uma sereia, ornado de perolas e grenadas; e finalmente um relicario de oiro. a cruz e o pingente são do seculo xvi; o relicario, pelas pinturas que o adornam, parece do seculo xvii. ao lado da custodia de belem está uma cruz tam- bem de oiro, já do seculo xvii, mas de elegante e apurado lavor. e toda coberta de rendilhados com rubis, diamantes, esmeraldas, brilhantes, saphiras e perolas. está vinculada na casa de bragança e denomina-se cruz de villa viçosa. além das duas vitrines de sua magestade el-rei, contem a sala g outras duas, occupadas por grande variedade de objectos na parte inferior; na parte superior por innumeros leques de varios exposito- res (pela maior parte expositoras) de lisboa e das provincias. tanto estes dois grupos de leques como o da sr.a condessa d'edla, exposto na sala f, fazem bellissimo effeito: semelhantes na forma e nas côres ás azas das borboletas, parecem bandos d'estes insectos a librar-se no espaço interior das vitrines. não lhe indicarei, meu amigo, os de maior preço, pois francamente confesso a minha ignorancia na materia, mas os mais bellos, ou pelo menos aquelles que assim me parecem. aqui está logo em frente um leque de inverno, exposto pelo sr. fernando palha ( ) e que decerto merece o logar em que foi collocado. notarei tambem disseminados pelos dois grupos, os das sr.as condessa de prime ( ) d. maria francisca saldanha de oliveira e daun ( , ), d. maria da gloria rezende coutinho ( ), viscondessa de daupias ( , , ), d. eugenia vizeu ( ), condessa de rio maior, d. izabel ( ), d. camilla ribeiro de faria ( ), marqueza de fronteira ( ), d. maria das dores ferreira navarro ( ). espõem, finalmente, exemplares não menos inte- ressantes os srs. albano pinto de mesquita carva- lho e gama ( ), conde de mesquitella ( ), au- gusto moreira ( ), francisco xavier de carvalho ( ), d. duarte manuel de noronha ( ) e c mu- seu municipal do porto ( ). e curiosa a collecção de caixas de rapé, expostas n'uma das vitrines a que me tenho referido. umas de oiro simples ou esmaltado, outras de prata branca ou doirada, outras com baixo-relevos, outras, final- mente, com miniaturas. entre muitas, de que pode- ria fazer digna menção, notarei apenas uma de pra- ta doirada com ornatos de applicação de filigrana de prata branca, pertencente ao sr. manuel barata de lima tovar, outra do sr. bento de queiroz, de vizeu, com um baixo-relevo que representa uma toirada. É tambem d'este ultimo expositor, cujo nome apparece tantas vezes repetido na exposição, uma grande bolsa de rede de prata doirada, que, pelas suas dimensões, destaca entre os relogios e caixas de rapé. parece do tempo de d. joão v e dolorosa. são bellos o colorido e a forma das figu- ras. ha porém nas posições a exageração e a affe- ctação que se apontam como defeitos caracteristicos das obras que sairam ou procederam da escola de mafra. este grupo é exposto pela sr. d. helena de aragão. logo adiante vê-se uma estatua de cera e gesso doirada que representa el rei d. josé. attri- bue-se a joaquim machado de castro, como um primeiro e desprezado modelo para o monumento do terreiro do paço. mencionarei ainda um cofre, só notavel por ser de ambar, e finalmente uma curiosidade, uma prova da paciencia e do lavor delicado de que são capazes um cerebro e mão humanos. É um papel recortado å thesoura, figurando uma paizagem e mettido entre duas laminas de vidro. a maior parte dos olhos passa como uma gravura em vidro ou crystal. É exposto este objecto pela sr. viscondessa de fonte arcada. occupam a parte inferior da vitrine grupos de joias de varios expositores, entre os quaes avulta a copiosa e variada collecção do sr. julio cordeiro. extremamente differentes nas formas, cores e dis- posição das pedras: brincos, anneis, collares, me- dalhas, adereços completos, broches, cruzes, relo- gios, alfinetes de peito, pregos de cabello, fivelas, condecorações, etc., são todos do seculo passado. deixemos agora as vitrines e demos um rapido giro á roda da sala, começando pela esquerda á en- trada. eis aqui sobre uma meza de pau santo um grande tinteiro de bronze, memoravel somente por ter pertencido ao primeiro marquez de pombal, em cuja casa religiosamente se tem conservado. sobre a mesma meza está um grande vaso de prata lavrada, obra de guimarães, do seculo xyli, e exposto pelo sr. manuel pedro guedes; e final- bordada a oiro, com anjos e outros ornatos de bronze doirado ( ). tem interesse unicamente como curiosidade historica. É a sedes gestatoria em que, no seculo passado, traziam o patriarcha em procissão, como n'um andor. recorda-nos, pois, aquelles privilegios que el-rei d. joão v comprou por avultadas sommas para ter em lisboa uma imi- tação das pompas religiosas de roma e do luxo pon- tificio, menos christão do que asiatico. cobre em parte a parede do fundo da sala i um biombo de cartão, ornado de medalhões com a serie dos monarchas portuguezes, desde o conde d. hen- rique até d. pedro il e seu filho o principe d. joão. na parte inferior veem-se representadas em seis grandes quadros as batalhas da restauração da in- dependencia nacional ( ). a fórma das casas, o colorido e a ornamentação suscitam a idea de que este singular biombo tenha sido pintado na china. foi exposto pela sr.a vis- condessa de fonte arcada; e diz-se que pertencera ao primeiro visconde d'este titulo, pedro jacques de magalhães, um dos cabos das guerras da inde- pendencia. o sr. custodio correia da rocha, de lamego, ex- põe um leito de pau santo de forma assås elegante e no estylo de luiz xv. É forrado de coiro estam- pado, como um canapé, e pode servir com colchão ou sem elle ( ). no topo da sala estão um espelho e mesa com obra de talha em grande relevo ( e ). como outros similhantes moveis, parece terem sido fei- tos com antigos fragmentos. foram expostos pelo sr. francisco d'aboim. encontram-se ainda na sala tres medalhões de faiança ( , e ), genero della robbia, simi- neto coo ve dos morer dente dois : cordeiro ( ) artes ( ). o primeiro rada esculpiora, cbras de talla del mais forte razão, a wrpado extremam ca-se, portanto, un quer que appareça. o segundo é um co que se attribuiria ao ables o producto de uil heapadba, como ga ita cteres da arte local os t gião se fabricaram em na sala h está um com frança, e attribuido a ca se conbecem, que pelo se a hypothese de que não mente antigos. na ceramica da sala ji interessantes. taes são azul epocas e estylos differentes, sobresaem pelas dimenso dros de azulejo, que foram cosa ( e ). um repre paizagens vivamente colorid as armas do duque de bra madas pela coroa e dragã abjos. a ornamentação á r nascença, e representa fitas, fructas, flores, vasos, etc. n’uma das paredes está um grande medalhão de marmore de carrara ( ), representando em mais de meio relevo nossa senhora com o menino, e dois. anjos sustendo uma grinalda. era da fachada da egreja da madre de deus, como se prova pelo conhecido quadro que a representa tal qual era no seculo xvi, encorporado hoje n'um movel de sacristia, e formando a parte posterior de · uma porta do mesmo movel, exposta na sala j, onde somente está à vista o quadro da face anterior, que representa o casamento de d. joão iii. a moldura primitiva do inedalhão já não existe. foi substituida pela de um outro medalhão de dia- metro um pouco maior. todavia é no genero d'a- quella que se perdeu. É tambem do mesmo genero e da mesma época um portico de faiança azul e branca com pilastras ornamentadas no estylo da renascença, e pertenceu egualmente ao mosteiro da madre de deus. ha n’esta sala dois notaveis baixo-relevos em pe- dra lithographica, ambos do seculo xvi. um, per- tencente ao sr. duque de loulé ( ), representa o calvario. o outro ( ), do sr. conde de villa real, representa o descimento da cruz. mencionarei, finalmente, algumas figuras de barro coloridas ( , , e ), que foram de um presepio d'aquelle convento, e que parecem obras do auctor de outras, expostas na sala g, e das quaes já fallei n'uma das minhas cartas antecedentes. o desenho é correcto, vivo e colorido, mas resente-se d'aquella exaggeração com que costumamos, ainda hoje, representar mais burlescos do que, em ver- dade, são alguns typos populares. entremos agora na sala k e examinemos primei- ramente a vitrine xxxii, que nos fica logo á entrada da porta. eis aqui numerosas imagens de santos, a maior parte das quaes são expostas pelo sr. cor- deiro feio. merecem attenção estes exemplares, bem como outros da mesma sala e da immediata. infe- lizmente, por serem quasi todos da mesma época, não bastam para representar nas suas differentes phases a imaginaria portugueza. já nos seculos xv e xvi havia muitos imaginarios, cuja arte se desenvolvia principalmente sob a pro- tecção das egrejas e conventos. todavia, anteriores ao seculo xviii, poucas obras d'este genero se en- contram na exposição. ter-se-hia de certo preen- chido esta falta, se não prevalecesse commumente a idea de que só poderiam ser apreciadas as coisas notaveis pelo seu valor intrinseco ou pela sua per- feição artistica. algumas das estatuetas, expostas pelo sr. cor- deiro feio, são de madeira pintada e doirada; ou- tras de marfim e ebano. estas ultimas diz-se terem sido feitas na italia e offerecidas por junot á con- dessa da ega. É possivel. mas, comparando esta collecção com outra, exposta na sala l, e que sei com certeza ter vindo de gôa no principio d'este seculo, entro em duvida sobre a veracidade d'aquella tradição. antes me parece dever attribuir as esta- tuetas n.ºs a e tambem outras, expostas na vitrine xxxv com os n.os a , á industria indo-portugueza dos fins do seculo xvii, ou dos princípios do seculo xviii. a.collecção da sala l consta de treze peças dif- ferentes, formando uma banqueta de altar de capella. uma figura de mulher, allegoria da asia, com um joelho em terra sustem sobre o outro joelho o do seculo svi e attribuidos o primeiro á industria italiana, o segundo á industria bespanhola. a espada, exposta pelo sr. manuel thimotheo de andrade, tem os punhos e os copos de oiro, orna- dos de bustos, tropheus e outros lavores e crave. jados de pedras. na folha lè se a data de , e n'uma face: viva d. joÃo de austria ; ,e na outra: viva d. joÃo de braganÇa. a bainha é de velludo carmezim e de oiro no terço inferior e no superior, o qual é tambem adornado de pedras. a coexistencia d'estas duas inscripções antinomi- cas na mesma espada é um facto inexplicavel. consta apenas que fora dada de presente a manuel thimo- theo valladares, antigo governador na india e no brazil. a vitrine xxxv contém entre muitos outros obje- ctos as estatuetas de marfim, a que já me referi, expostas pela sr.a d. laura rodrigues blanco; chi- caras e pires de porcelana do derbi cornwall, do sr. fernando palha; estatuetas de saxe, do sr. pes- soa de amorim; um par de pistolas com ornatos de prata do sr. dr. caetano de albuquerque; dois medalhões de wedgwood, um busto de agatha sobre um lindissimo pedestal ornado de esmaltes e rubis, um serviço de almoço de saxe e um orgão portatil com ornatos gravados em marfim e com a seguinte inscripção: arsacyos geyer hoc opvs fecit . es- tes ultimos objectos pertencem á academia real das sciencias de lisboa. · ha na sala k, alguns moveis notaveis. o maior, e o que mais prende a attenção dos visitantes, é um grande leito italiano do seculo xvii, com ornatos de prata rebatida e cinzelada, e com pinturas re- presentando assumptos mythologicos. um escudo com as armas da casa de sabugal serve de remate å cabeceira. pertence actualmente, bem como a colcha que o cobre, ao sr. julio cordeiro. nas salas ke l ha grande numero e variedade de cadeiras, algumas do seculo xvii, a maior parte do seculo xviii. julgo, porém, que em lisboa e ainda na provincia se encontrariam algumas mais antigas e mais interessantes, que as que figuram na exposição. das expostas nas salas ke l as mais notaveis são duas de guadamecis, uma da academia real de bellas artes, outra do sr. marquez da graciosa, ambas muito similhantes e attribuiveis å industria hespanhola do seculo xvii; outras duas com assen- tos de coiro estampado e costas de madeira com um brazão esculpido ( e ), ambas do seculo xviii, uma d'ellas exposta pelo sr. basilio cabral teixeira de queiroz, outra pela academia de bellas artes de lisboa. da antiga cadeira de coiro portugueza do seculo xvii e xviii, da qual se conservam ainda tantos exemplares de formas differentes, poucos vieram á exposição. além das duas expostas na sala j, pou- cas mais se encontram nas salas ke l; e ainda al- gumas d'ellas com restaurações evidentes. as cadeiras de coiro com moldura de talha do seculo xviii, em que os grossos pés revestidos de arabescos e folhagens substituem já os torcidos ou torneados, estão mais bem representadas. entre ellas merecem attenção duas do extincto mosteiro de lorvão, e uma do sr. visconde de daupias ( e ). grande parte dos moveis, enviados á exposição, e collocados não somente nas salas ke l, mas tam- bem nas anteriores g, h, i e j, são estrangeiros. sabe-se, todavia, que a industria da mobilia foi uma das que mais produziram em portugal, e que mais se differenciaram, por caracteres particulares, das industrias correspondentes de outros paizes. infelizmente, a commissão executiva, occupada com os trabalhos da organisação da exposição, não teve tempo de procurar e de pedir em lisboa os exemplares d’este genero. por outra parte, alguns dos expositores deixaram em casa os antigos mo- veis portuguezes, para mandar os estrangeiros, de certo mais bellos e de maior preço, mas que de modo nenhum deveriam obter a preferencia para uma exposição da arte portugueza. . tres grandes armarios, dois designados com os n. e na salà k e outro com o n.º na sala l, representam na exposição um genero, de que se encontram ainda muitos exemplares em portu- gal. conhecem-se n'outros paizes moveis similhan- tes, hollandezes ou flamengos, que talvez tenham sido imitados em portugal. no mais bello dos tres lê-se na parte inferior em grandes letras relevadas : anno . este armario, de madeira de carvalho, pertenceu ao extincto convento de chellas, o outro da sala k, tambem de carvalho, exposto pelo sr. paiva de andrada, torna-se notavel pelas figuras e outros ornatos de talha, se bem que menos perfeita que a do anterior. o da sala l, de pau santo o de forma assás elegante, pertence a academia de bellas ar- tes de lisboa. dos grandes armarios de pau santo, ornados de tremidos e com bellas chapas e puxadeiras de latão, que pelo estylo correspondem aos contadores, me- sas, e cadeiras de pés torneados, não temos na ex- posição nenhum exemplar, posto que se encontrem ainda em algumas casas de lisboa e das provin- cias. esta industria portugueza do seculo xvii, está re- presentada na sala k somente por um elegante con- tador ( ), exposto pelo sr. teixeira de aragão. alguns contadores e outros moveis de embutidos representam nas salas ke l a industria indiana, da qual se encontram ainda em portugal tantos exem- plares. da sala k merecem menção dois moveis, como obras caracteristicamente portuguezas. É uma com- moda de pau santo ( ) com embutidos de madeira de espinheiro e puxadores de latão circulares, que servem como de molduras a medalhões de esmalte, que representam bustos de mulheres. pertence ao sr. d. miguel pereira coutinho. o outro é um touca- dor ( ) do mesmo genero, exposto pela sr. d. he- lena de aragão. uma parede da sala k está coberta de armas de varias especies e épocas, elegantemente dispostas. são escudos, capacetes, cotas de malha, peitos, cou- raças e outras peças de armaduras, espadas, espa- dins, alabardas, punhaes, esporas, acicates, etc., em numero de mais de cem exemplares. nos vãos das janellas dois armeiros contéem es- pingardas dos srs. manuel bento de sousa e tei- xeira de aragão, umas do seculo passado, outras já d'este seculo, e quasi todas com os nomes ou marcas dos fabricantes portuguezes. finalmente, de outra parede pende ainda um me- dalhão de faiança do genero della robbia. repre- senta em alto relevo o busto de um imperador ro- mano. a moldura é egual ás dos outros medalhões já mencionados, e o desenho do busto egualmente correcto. foi exposto pelo sr. visconde de daupias. a vitrine xxxvi da sala l contém grande numero de objectos de cobre esmaltado. vinte e dois, collo- cados todos na parte inferior, formam a notavel col- , lecção dos srs. duques de palmella, outrora per- tencente, segundo consta, á casa de angeja. d'estes vinte e seis objectos, vinte e tres são de cobre es- maltado de limoges, do seculo xvi e xvii, notaveis pela belleza, variedade de fórmas, differença do co- lorido e diversidade dos desenhos. · a collecção consta de pratos, fructeiros, častiçaes, saleiros, um tinteiro e um repuxo. em dois gran- des pratos ellipticos ou travessas estão representa- dos, n'um o banquete dos deuses, no outro o rapto de europa. estes bellos quadros fazem lembrar, pelo esmero, nitidez e elegancia das figuras, as obras ca- pitaes da renascença. . examinando com attenção estas curiosas peças, n'ellas se reconhecem tres typos differentes.. ao primeiro pertencem os dois grandes pratos ellipticos e alguns dos fructeiros. um d'aquelles tem a data de e as iniciaes p. r. (pierre rey- mond). o segundo typo, menos antigo, é o dos fructeiros e de differentes objectos de varias formas, destina- dos para usos diversos. o nome do fabricante jean laudin, faz parte da legenda de um pequeno prato. o terceiro, finalmente, differença-se dos outros dois por signaes muito caracteristicos. os seis pra- tos d'este ultimo genero representam assumptos re- ligiosos, ainda com as minucias das antigas pintu- ras flamengas, e são de todos os da collecção aquel- les que menos differem dos outros esmaltes do se- culo xvi, expostos nas salas f e m. as letras i. c. que se encontram no reverso dos pratos parece se. rem do nome jehan courteys. uma das classes do programma que menos re- presentada está na exposição, é a dos instrumentos musicos, notaveis pelos ornatos. não faltarão elles de certo em hespanha e portugal, onde o povo tanto aprecia as obras de madeira com embutidos de cores. sendo em verdade para lamentar esta falta, não deixarei de mencionar dois bandolins da vitrine xxxii, expostos pela sr.a d. maria julia botelho lobo de santos e silva. são ambos de madeira marchetada de tartaruga e madre-perola, e um d'elles tem o se- guinte letreiro : daniel de matos o fez em lisboa. na praÇa da alegria no anno de . na mesma vitrine e na immediata, marcada com o numero xxxviii, estão as treze peças da banqueta de ebano e marfim a que já me referi, e n’esta ul- tima tambem merece attenção o assento e o espal- dar de uma cadeira de coiro estampado e doirado. o desenho dos ornatos estampados é commum, a douradura, porém, bastante rara, particularmente com a perfeição que conserva n'este exemplar. e do sr. maximino de mattos carvalho. algumas tapeçarias cobrem as paredes da sala k, que, pela sua estreiteza e pouca luz, não deixa bem aprecial-as. as mais antigas e de mais preço são dois pannos de arras do seculo xv, analogos pelos desenhos e colorido ás boas pinturas flamengas da mesma época. infelizmente, não estão tão bem con- servados como aquelle que pertenceu ao convento da madre de deus, e foi exposto na sala a. as ou- tras tapeçarias fazem parte da secção hespanhola. finalmente, para concluir o que tenho a dizer da sala l, mencionarei um azulejo do seculo xvi, que faz lembrar, pelo colorido, e talvez pelo estylo, aquelle que el-rei o senhor d. fernando expoz na sala f. procede do convento de s. bento, de evora. vi a sala m as salas m, ne , contéem a grande collecção de obras de ourivesaria, por entre as quaes se in- tercallaram algumas de outras classes, afim de evi- tar o aspecto monotono de uma longa serie de ob- jectos metallicos. na disposição d'esta collecção por todas as tres salas, seguiu-se a ordem chronologica, excepto em. certos casos, em que, por conveniencia da colloca- ção, se alterou excepcionalmente o systema geral. a sala m, a maior de todas, é occupada pelos exemplares da edade media e do seculo xvi. a sala n, por alguns ainda do seculo xvi e pelos do seculo xvii. a sala , finalmente, pelos do se- culo xviii, com mui poucas excepções.. a evolução da arte segue-se, pois, como n'um livro de historia, por todas as tres salas, cada uma das quaes, e mais em particular a sala n e a sala , teem a sua feição caracteristica dependente do es- tylo do seculo respectivo. falta, porém, na sala m esta unidade de estylo. a maior parte das obras de arte, que contém, são ogivaes; mas, além d'estas, muitas outras anterio- res: arabes, byzantinas, romanicas; outras tam- bem posteriores, produzidas já pela renascença; outras, finalmente, em que os dois estylos se com- binam, formando umas vezes bellos contrastes, ou- tras vezes productos hybridos e disformes. tudo isto faz com que seja extremamente cu- rioso o aspecto da sala m. os seus exemplares re- presentam-nos as revoluções que, durante a edade média, mudaram as nacionalidades, os systemas po- liticos, os cultos religiosos e os estylos das artes; depois o grande movimento da renascença, que abriu aos povos europeus os largos horisontes da civilisação grega e romana; finalmente, os esforços dos artistas para accommodar ás exigencias de uma religião monotheista a architectura e a esculptura do polytheismo, esforços que de certo lhes sairiam baldados, se não tivessem os santos e santas do calendario para substituir aos antigos deuses, re- presentando-os na estatuaria, ou agrupando-os nos baixo-relevos. os exemplares mais antigos da sala m, são al- gumas obras da arte mahometana. já antecedente- mente me referi ao cofre de marfim hispano-arabe da sé de braga ( ), quando fallei de outras simi- lhantes antigualhas do museu kensington. uma d'es- tas ultimas, a mais notavel de todas, tem a maior analogia com o cofre de braga, nas inscripções, na fórma e na ornamentação. ambas as inscripções de caracteres cuficos, estão gravadas nas bordas das tampas, quasi hemisphe- ricas. no cofre do museu kensington, falta, com um grande pedaço da tampa, a primeira parte da in- scripção, a qual diria, segundo a formula commum: em nome de deus, etc. a parte restante, anda in- terpretada nos catalogos do museu, pela seguinte forma : prosperidade e felicidade para riyadh ben aflah, capitÃo da guarda superior : isto foi feito no anno de (a. d. ). a inscripção do cofre da sé de braga, segundo a lição, publicada n’uma carta de a. soromenho, nas artes e letras ( .a serie, pag. ), diz o se- guinte: em nome de deus a benÇÃo e prosperidade e a fortuna para o hadjeb seifo'-d-daula por esta obra que mandou fazer por mĀos de... seu eunuco alamerita. o auctor da carta suppoz que na parte que falta da tampa estaria o nome do eunuco, e julgou tam- bem, por considerações historicas acerca do perso- nagem, a quem pertenceu o cognome de seifo’-d- daula, que o cofre da sé de braga terá sido feito entre os annos e . a maior similhança está nas fórmas dos dois co- fres. ambos teem os corpos cylindricos e as tam- pas quasi hemisphericas, mas o de braga, de me- nor diametro, é mais elegante. tanto um como outro são inteiramente cobertos de lavores do mesmo estylo. no de braga, porém, não se representaram scenas correspondentes ás dos tres quadros que adornam o do museu kensington. sobre seis columnas incompletas estribam-se outros tantos arcos de volta de ferradura, encimados por medalhões circulares, cujo espaço é occupado, em cada um d'elles, por uma ave ou um quadrupede. os espaços interiores e exteriores dos arcos são pre- enchidos com arvores, ramagens, flores, fructas, fi- guras de homens e de animaes, etc. a inscripção do cofre de pamplona, ao qual tam- bem já me referi, e que, pelas scenas representa- das nos quadros ou medalhões da face anterior, se assimelha por extremo ao cofre do museu kensin- gton, dará o nome do auctor dos tres cofres e com- pletará a historia d'estas curiosissimas antigualhas : em nome de deus, a benÇÃo de deus, a completa felicidade, a fortuna, a realisaÇÃo da esperanÇa das boas obras e o adiamento do termo fatal para o hagib seifo dÁula abdelmalek ben almansur : isto foi feito por sua ordem, sob a inspecÇÃo e direccÃo do chefe dos seus eunucos, nomayr ben mohammad alameri, seu escravo; no anno de , (a. d. ) . entre os outros exemplares da arte mahometana merecem particular menção dois fragmentos de gesso com ornamentação de folhas em baixo-relevo ( e ) e o capitel de marmore ( ) lavrado no mesmo es- tylo, encontrados em montemor-o-velho, em exca- vações feitas na parte superior do castello. o que principalmente då importancia a estes fragmentos é a raridade dos vestigios da época arabe em portugal. são de tempos menos antigos outras obras da arte mahometana, conjuntamente expostas por se- rem da mesma classe. algumas serão talvez imita- ções modernas. com quanto não sejam obras da arte peninsular, teem grande interesse, pelo estylo caracteristico e como documentos para a historia dos esmaltes de limoges, dois relicarios da sé de vizeu ( e ) de madeira revestida de cobre esmaltado com figuras em meio relevo de cobre doirado. na secção hes- panhola estão dois relicarios similhantes, proceden- tes de s. marcos de leão, porém, menores e mais imperfeitos. tanto uns como os outros se attribuem ao seculo xii ou xiii. j. p. riaño - the industrial arts in spain, pag. . entre as obras d'esta mesma época se hão de classificar dois baculos de cobre doirado, um da sé de braga ( ), outro da egreja da ermida de castro daire ( ), uma imagem do bispo s. nicolau, de prata doirada, da sé de coimbra ( ) e a grande collecção de calices byzantinos ( , , , , e ). a academia de bellas artes de lisboa pertencem tres, dos quaes dois foram da egreja de alcobaça, como se deprehende das suas inscripções. aquella que foi gravada na face interior da base do maior ( ) diz: in nomine domini nostri jesu christi hunc calice dedit regina dvlcia alcvbacie in honore dei et gloriose virginis marie ad serviendvm in maiore altare. a inscripção gravada na base de outro ( ) é a seguinte: calix iste ad honorem dei et sancte marie de alcobacia factum est. n'outro finalmente ( ) lê-se: emccxxv rex sanci et regina dvlcia offervnt calicem istvm sancte marine de costa. ainda hoje pertence a esta mesma egreja de santa marinha da costa, perto de guimarães. os outros dois calices teem a mesma forma, po- rém, ha differenças notaveis na ornamentação. o da sé de coimbra ( ) é muito mais elegante e muito mais perfeito nos lavores. adornam a base os emblemas dos quatro evan- gelistas, em medalhões circulares. na borda inferior lê-se: geda menendiz me fecit in onorem sancti michaelis e mclxxxx. o nó é de filigrana, como o do grande calix de alcobaça, e a copa quasi toda coberta com as figuras dos apostolos, com os seus respectivos nomes gravados em cima, na borda superior. na superficie da copa conservam-se ainda servia para guardar as reliquias de s. vicente. po- rėm tanto os arabescos lineares como as figuras de s. vicente, de corvos e de galeões, que adornamo cofre da sé de lisboa, são de lavor menos perfeito. a cruz da mitra patriarchal ( ) parece obra hespanhola do seculo xii ou xiv. a disposição das linhas correspondentes aos engasles das pedras é muito notavel. a maior parte das figuras resultan- tes do encruzamento d'essas linhas são ogivaes, mas o desenho geral e o intrincado das voltas parece do estylo arabe. não sei determinar tambem a origem de um co- fre de madeira, da mesma época, pertencente ao cabido de vizeu ( ). e interessante a pintura da face interior da tampa, representando em fundo prateado um cavallo, um cavalleiro e uma dama. da ourivesaria da segunda metade do século xiv e do seculo xv apparecem já maior numero de mo. numentos. a custodia de alcobaça ( ), despre- zando a parte media, accrescentada no seculo xvii, é um bom exemplar para a determinação do estylo d'esta época. a ornamentação e a forma dos ele- mentos architectonicos tem caracteres salientes. a inscripção com a data é um documento importante: esta copa mandou fazer don frei joam dornelas abade de alcobaÇa era de mil quatro cento e quatro. o exame comparativo da custodia, das cruzes de alcobaça ( a), da sé de coimbra ( ), da aca- demia de bellas artes ( ), da freguezia de gaula ( ), da collegiada de guimarães ( ), de montela- var ( ) dá a idéa mais geral dos caracteres da ou- rivesaria dos seculos xiv e xv. taes são as formas acastelladas, a proeminencia e altura das torres e gi- gantes, os ornatos lineares que se enrolam à ma- n dos despojos do rei de castella na batalha de alju- barrota. contra a tradição estão protestando expres- sivamente os escudos das armas reaes portuguezas, sem vestigio nenhum de terem sido accrescentados å fabrica primitiva. gaspar estaço, conego da collegiada de guima- rães, que viveu nos seculos xvi e xvii e publicou o seu livro intitulado varias antiguidades de portugal em , não falla de semelhante lenda. antes, re- ferindo-se a el-rei d. joão i, diz que, armado de to- das suas armas, ase mandou pesar a prata, e a deu a nossa senhora de offerta. da qual se fez o reta- bulo de prata do presepe de christo nosso senhor, que nos dias solemnes se põe no altar maior, em que estão as armas d’este rei. não é de modo nenhum crivel que um conego da collegiada, antiquario, deixasse de mencionar a pro- cedencia do oratorio, se estivesse convencido de que em verdade fôra tomado ao rei de castella na ba- talha de aljubarrota. as pequenas torres ameiadas predominam, como ornatos, na base da cruz-relicario do convento da conceição de beja ( ), e melhor ainda no relicario da sé de coimbra ( ). esta peça é curiosissima pela fórma e pela inscripção, que transcreverei sem as abreviaturas: hic continet vnvm velvm beate virginis marie et vnvm frysticvm ligni sancte crvcis vere. decanvs colimbriensis johanes medicvs illustrissimi domini infantis petri me obtulit li- tissime virginis marie. do seculo xv ha tambem na sala m outros objectos não menos dignos de attenção. É um d'elles o co- fresinho de prata doirada da misericordia de mon- temor-o-novo ( ). a sua fórma, simples e ele- gante é a de um pequenino bahú. adornam a face dignos dorada da mista. simples e face parte inferior juntáram-lhe uma peanha de prata ligada por meio de um arco á placa de crystal, tudo isto se fez no seculo xvii. e por ser d'esta época se expoz aquelle ornalo na sala , onde tem o n.º . os calices, que attribuirei com mais certeza ao seculo xv, veem a ser os da academia de bellas ar- tes de lisboa ( ), da vera cruz, de aveiro ( ) e da mitra patriarchal ( ). differença-se o primeiro, e mais antigo, dos outros, pela sua forma obsoleta e pelo caracter archaico dos caracteres gothicos das suas inscripções. a base tem grandes chanfros, e na sua face superior dois qua- dros de esmalte, como o calix mais antigo da col- legiada de guimarães ( ), e folhagens similhan- tes ás do cofre da mesma collegiada ( ). o nó do calix, hexagono, liga-se por meio de botareus a um plano tambem hexagono, que se muito para fóra, á maneira de varanda. É unica esta disposi- ção em todos os calices expostos. a copa, de forma pyramidal, assimelha-se tambem á do calix de gui- marães mais antigo; é porém menos aberta. o calix da mitra patriarchal relaciona-se melhor, pelas fórmas acastelladas da sua haste, pelas arca- rias do nó e pelos baixo-relevos da copa e da base, com outras obras portuguezas da mesma época. os arcos das ogivas são polycentricos. o calix da vera cruz, de aveiro ( ) approxi- ma-se já dos exemplares do seculo xvi nos ornatos de applicação na copa e de relevo na base; mas o nó volumoso, faceado, e os losangos que o ador- nam são caracteristicos do seculo xv. e tambem de caracter anterior ao seculo xvi o engradado do bordo ou frizo da base e o plano liso, que tem à roda. a fórma caracteristica do nó com os seus losan. gos encontra-se nas hastes das cruzes processionaes da misericordia de setubal ( a) e de santo an- dré de mafra ( ). da primeira conserva-se ainda a primitiva caixa de coiro com a seguinte inscri- pção gravada a buril em caracteres gothicos do se- culo xv: senhora virgem santa maria lembra te do tev devoto nvno gonÇalves. nos losangos esmal- tados da segunda estão representadas as armas dos sousas. outro exemplar curioso d'este mesmo seculo é o porta-paz de prata doirada da sé de leiria ( ). sob um baldaquino gothico de forma assås caracte- ristica, está a imagem da senhora da piedade; na base sobre esmalte azul uma inscripção de caracte- res gothicos arredondados, que diz: pax domini sit semper vobiscum. para concluir esta breve noticia dos objectos da ourivesaria do seculo xv, falta-me citar o relicario de chellas ( ), cujo nó tem a forma e os losangos caracteristicos. o tecto, pyramidal, é imbricado; a base ornada de folhagens em relevo, similhantes ás do calix da vera cruz, de aveiro, e de outras peças. além da caixa de coiro, já mencionada, estão ex- postos na sala m alguns objectos do seculo xv, que não pertencem a classe da ourivesaria. tal é o baixo- relevo em jaspe ( ) do sr. domingos josé de oli- veira salvador, de lamego. representa a annun- ciação. as figuras da virgem e do anjo gabriel, extremamente curiosas, teem grande expressão. na parte superior está o padre eterno, de cuja bocca sae uma longa fita, terminada em pomba, que se dirige ao rosto da virgem. era commum na edade media este costume de representar figuradamente a conceição. na egreja de leça do balio conserva-se um baixo-relevo com ermida de s. braz ( ), attribuil-os-hei, pois, só com probabilidade e não com certeza, ao seculo xv. o ultimo é o unico em que se observa a seguinte notavel particularidade: alguns dos anjos da copa são barbados. o calix maior da sé de coimbra ( ) é obra do mesmo ourives, que fez o da mitra patriarchal ( ), cujas fórmas acastelladas da base lhe determinam com certeza a edade. ora estas mesmas fórmas se encontram na parte inferior da haste do calix da sé de coimbra, na qual as seis faces que represen- tam as muralhas do castello estão cobertas ainda de arcarias ogivaes. tambem as devem ter tido as partes correspondentes do calix da mitra patriarchal, de onde as arrancaram, ficando patentes os orifi- cios em que estiveram cravadas. debalde, porém, se buscarão n'este ultimo ves- tigios do estylo da renascença, bem claros na base e na copa do outro. com effeito, as duas bases são extremamente similhantes, mas na do calix da mitra patriarchal, as figuras em baixo-relevo estão sepa- radas por pilastras puramente gothicas, formadas de cordões torcidos e com capiteis e bases caracte- risticos do seculo xv. na base do calix da sé de coimbra, em vez das pilastras gothicas, apparecern- nos as da renascença, com os capiteis corinthios e os fustes cobertos dos ornatos caracteristicos. as copas de ambos os calices são em grande parte envolvidas por ornatos de applicação, que não adherem á superficie - por seis anjos, que rama- gens separam. mas os anjos e as ramagens do calix da mitra patriarchal são gothicos, os do calix da sé de coimbra, sem serem ainda inteiramente da re- nascença, teem mais d'este estylo que do gothico. os dois calices representam portanto muito bem as duas maneiras de um mesmo artista, educado no estylo ogival, e influenciado pela renascença nos fins do seculo xv ou nos principios do seculo xvi. o calix da sé de coimbra já ali existia no pri- meiro quartel do seculo xvi, pois por esse tempo o mandou doirar o bispo d. jorge de almeida. ne- nhum d'estes dois calices tem tintinabulos, nem jamais os teve, porque lhes faltam os anneis para se suspenderem. a custodia e o calix da misericordia de setubal ( e ) parecem tambem obras de um mesmo ourives. os chanfros das bases, extremamente si- milhantes n'estes dois exemplares, não se encontram assim em nenhum dos outros expostos. a esta si- milhança corresponde a dos nós, não obstante ser quadrangular o da custodia, e hexagono o do calix. a ornamentação é a mesma em ambos, no calix, porém, mais fina e delicada. a caixa circular da custodia foi acrescentada modernamente. É possivel que por este meio transformassem em custodia um relicario. este curioso exemplar torna-se notavel pe- los extensos esmaltes que cobrem a haste por cima e por baixo do nó. expõe tambem a misericordia de setubal um re- licario, e este sem alterações grandes da sua fabrica primitiva. o estylo, porém, não é exactamente o mesmo das outras duas alfaias e relaciona-se antes com o da custodia de s. martinho de cintra e do calix de s. pedro de almargem do bispo, do con- celho de cintra. estas tres peças formam outro grupo muito na- tural, que se differença pela extrema singeleza das arcarias ogivaes, cujos grandes espaços intermedios são inteiramente vasios de ornatos. todavia o reli- cario da misericordia de setubal parece mais antigo, vii a sala m (continuação) não faltou quem estranhasse a accumulação de grande numero de alfaias do culto nas salas da ex- posição, dando-lhes um aspecto menos profano do que alguns desejavam, como se para a historia ar- tistica fosse possivel lançar á margem a arte reli- giosa. esta carta provará, bem como algumas das ante- riores, que essa accumulação é a unica luz que, á falta de documentos escriptos, pode esclarecer-nos acerca da historia da arte nacional, que até hoje ninguem escreveu. n'este labyrinto, cheio de som- bras e de incertezas, somente o exame comparativo de muitos exemplares nos dará, por inducção, ba- ses certas e positivas para qualquer tentativa histo- rica. as custodias dos seculos xiv, xv e xvi, sobre- tudo, formam uma serie muito interessante para a determinação dos estylos e das épocas, pelas datas ou indicações equivalentes, que se encontram na maior parte d'ellas. eis aqui a serie por ordem chronologica : custodia de alcobaça ( ) — . dita do porto ( ) – fins do seculo xv. dita de setubal ( ) — fins do seculo xv ou prin- cipios do seculo xvi. dita de belem (gi)- . dita de evora ( ) — ... dita de cintra ( ) – ... dita de coimbra ( ) - . dita de vizeu ( ) — . dita da academia ( ) — ... dita de guimarães ( ) — . a custodia de belem, unica em tudo, não se re- laciona com algum outro dos exemplares da ouri- vesaria expostos, excepto nos caracteres geraes do estylo ogival. x custodia da sé de evora já não é um exem- plar unico. tem analogias com outros da sala m. convirá, porém, advertir que algumas das partes primitivas d’esta custodia foram substituidas por outras de estylo inteiramente discordante. vê-se cla- ramente a substituição na caixa circular do relicario com os seraphins que lateralmente a adornam. fo- ram egualmente substituidos o nó e as partes mais proximas da haste, tanto por cima, como por baixo d'elle. subsiste ainda assim a maior parte da fabrica primitiva, de estylo muito similhante ao da cruz do convento do paraizo de evora ( ), cruz de bel- las ( ), base da cruz da terrugem ( ) e thuri- bulo de pombeiro ( ). os caracteres principaes d'este estylo veem a ser: columnas quadrangulares simples, com faces empe- nadas, arestas mais ou menos tortas, corucheus vo- lumosos com a forma de apagador: corpos qua- drangulares com as faces fenestradas, e ornadas na parte superior com voltas formadas pelos arcos das ogivas, prolongados á maneira de de conta, e, al- gumas vezes, de volutas, como em varios exempla. res do seculo xv. a custodia da sé do porto, obra dos fins d'este mesmo seculo, parece marcar a origem de um ou- tro estylo, que é o das custodias das sés de coim- bra e de vizeu, da academia e da collegiada de guimarães, do porta-paz da academia ( ), da cruz do funchal ( ) e do calix de pombeiro ( ). os caracteres d'este estylo são os seguintes : - lumnas delgadas compostas de columnelos juxta- postos, faces perfeitamente desempenadas e arestas rectilineas, corucheus esguios e elegantes : arcadas ogivaes articuladas com as columnas, estatuetas bem cinzeladas e elegantes, ornamentação fina e delicada. a obra mais antiga d'este estylo é a custodia da sé do porto. mas, com quanto nos offereça os cara- cteres differenciaes já mencionados, excede em de- licadeza e perfeição os outros exemplares. a sua grande, similhança com a custodia da collecção des- mottes, que figurou na ultima exposição nacional da belgica, faz suppor que não terá sido fabricada em portugal. demais as outras obras da ourivesaria na- cional da mesina época differem consideravelmente pelo seu estylo mais pesado e menos perfeito. a cruz da sé do funchal parece ter sido antes feita em portugal. assimelha-se mais aos outros exemplares do mesmo grupo nos elementos archi- tectonicos da base. por outra parte os baixo-rele- vos dos braços e da haste teem a maior analogia com os de alguns dos antigos pratos portuguezes. finalmente, os rendilhados e ornatos de applicação com a forma de ramagens relacionam assim natu- ralmente este exemplar com o calix de pombeiro. ha tambem grandes similhanças entre as custo- dias da sé de coimbra e da collegiada de guima- rães, não obstante as grandes differenças de fórma. basta a situação inversa dos relicarios, que são in- ferior na primeira e superior na segunda, para dar logar a fabricas essencialmente differentes. com- tudo quem examinar e comparar com attenção es- tes dois exemplares, convencer-se-ha sem difficul- dade da sua mesma origem. em ambas as custodias as cupulas terminam em ornatos com a forma de jarras. as columnas são similhantes em tudo; os rendilhados, os mesmos; as arcadas ogivaes do mesmo estylo articulam-se do mesmo modo com as columnas; as bases apoiam-se em animaes; em gryphos e centauros na de guima- rães, em leões na de coimbra. mas a escolha d’es- tes ultimos animaes foi sem duvida determinada pelo brazão do bispo d. jorge de almeida. finalmente, as estatuetas são ainda analogas, tanto pela per- feição do desenho, como pela delicadeza do cinzel. estes mesmos caracteres apparecem tambem no bello porta-paz da academia ( a). as relações de similhança entre os exemplares mencionados são evidentes. se foi um artista só ou uma escola, que os produziu desde até , não o sei eu dizer. seriam necessarios elementos de outra ordem para resolver esta duvida. a cruz da collegiada de guimarães é outro pro- blema. na fórma e ornamentação geral da cruz propriamente dita assimelha-se aos exemplares do grupo a que pertence a custodia da sé de evora. a peanha, pelo contrario, tem maior analogia com os exemplares do segundo grupo, que parece deri- var da custodia da sé do porto. todavia, os ele- mentos architectonicos são mais pesados e o traba- lho de cinzel mais imperfeito. os baixo-relevos, os medalhões e outros ornatos são do estylo da renascença. as columnas, coru- cheus e arcarias pertencem ainda ao estylo gothico. em nenhum outro dos exemplares expostos se en- contra de tão extraordinario modo a mistura dos dois estylos. É talvez n’este genero o maior con- traste conhecido. as custodias e as cruzes processionaes, com serem de fórmas essencialmente differentes, participam to- davia de certos caracteres communs de estructura e de ornamentação, que permittem classifical-as nos mesmos grupos, á maneira de varios generos de plantas que, não obstante suas formas diversas, se reunem nas mesmas familias. debalde, porém, se tentará distribuir os calices pelos grupos formados por aquelles exemplares. as differenças na ornamentação e na fórma, são de tal ordem, que o exame comparativo, só por si, parece insufficiente para servir de base a qualquer plausi- vel tentativa de classificação racional. assim é, que de tantos calices da mesma época . e do mesmo estylo das cruzes e custodias, apenas um, o de pombeiro ( ), offerece alguns caracte- res importantes, para se incluir n'um mesmo grupo com a cruz do funchal ( ). o calix menor da sè de coimbra ( ) poderá ainda relacionar-se com a custodia da academia ( ) pela similhança das fitas entrelaçados que adornam as bases das d’estes dois exemplares. o calix me- nor de arouca ( ) faz lembrar tambem, por al- gumas particularidades da ornamentação, o grupo a que pertence a custodia de evora ( ). todos os outros se tornam, por assim dizer, refractarios ao agrupamento. o maior dos calices que foram de arouca ( ) como callacionar-das i expostos, deveria dar ao de arouca um aspecto sin- gularissimo, augmentando ainda a exuberancia da sua grande e complexa ornamentação. É para la- mentar que hoje não possamos fazer a menor idéa dos ornatos que se fixavam na copa, alternando-se com os tintinabulos. ao passo que este calix, pelas razões indicadas, sobreleva a todos os que se conhecem do mesmo es- tylo, o outro, do mesmo mosteiro, da mesma época, da mesma abbadessa d. melicia de mello, com uma patena muito similhante, é uma obra que se não differença por nenhuma particularidade notavel, dos outros calices dos principios do seculo xvi. os ornatos esmaltados da base assimelham-se aos dos calices de braga e de guimarães. os dois cor- pos acastellados da haste, um, adornando a sua parte inferior, o outro, servindo de nó, caracteri- sam tambem os calices da mitra patriarchal e da sé de coimbra. mas isto, parece-me, não basta para collocar decisivamente todos estes exemplares no mesmo grupo em que foram classificadas a custo- dia de evora e algumas cruzes processionaes. o que tenho como admissivel é, tomando por base as fórmas acastelladas da haste e a existencia de dois ou tres corpos com essas formas, sendo um ou dois separados do nó, constituir, não um grupo natural, mas uma serie chronologica : calix da mitra patriarchal ( ), dito da sé de coimbra ( ), dito de arouca (menor) ( ), cus- todia-calix de cintra ( ), calix de thomar (g- ), dito de arouca (maior) ( ) se á custodia-calix da sé de evora não fallasse o nó e outras partes da haste, é possivel que, pela comparação, se chegasse a classificar no grupo a que ella pertence aquella serie de calices, excepto aturais da mitra de arouca de thomar talvez o maior de arouca ( ). o mais que pode- rei avançar com probabilidade é que a serie dos ca- lices gothicos se relaciona melhor com o grupo da custodia de evora do que com o outro em que en- tram as custodias da sé de coimbra e da collegiada de guimarães. na serie indicada segue-se passo a passo a trans- formação do elemento architectonico, que n'alguns exemplares do seculo xv, como o relicario da sé de coimbra ( ) e a cruz da sé do porto ( ) é uma verdadeira torre, guarnecida de ameias ou coberta de cupula. este elemento, pois, começa a adelga- çar-se separando-se da muralha nos calices da mi- tra patriarchal e da sé de coimbra, até se tornar filiforme no calix maior de arouca. de sorte que, não se observando a degeneração progressiva, se- ria difficil, se não impossivel, reconhecer n'este ul- timo calix, como torres, os ornatos que mal as re- presentam. termina aqui o estudo dos calices gothicos. os outros, ainda em grande parte do seculo svi, como obras do estylo da renascença, embora n'alguns se encontre um ou outro vestigio gothico, serão exami- nados mais tarde com os outros exemplares d'este mesmo estylo. tenho-me alongado demasiadamente na critica dos exemplares expostos na sala m. pareceu-me, porém, não dever perder a occasião, talvez unica, de ajun. tar alguns materiaes para a historia da antiga ou- rivesaria portugueza tão interessante, como desco- nhecida. a falta de documentos escriptos, não ha senão o methodo da inducção, tal como o tenho empregado, que possa dar-nos resultados positivos, comparaveis aquelles que os naturalistas obteem nas suas clas- sificações ou na historia e explicação dos phenome- nos naturaes. methodo, pois, está exigindo que os pratos e salvas da sala m se estudem conjunctamente com os das outras salas da exposição. a maior parte d'estes exemplares teem os cara- cteres geraes do estylo portuguez. do primeiro exame não resulta mais que esta idea de uma dif- ferença fundamental entre o seu estylo e o das obras de ourivesaria das outras nações. depois uma obser- vação mais demorada fará descobrir caracteres dif- ferenciaes que denotam typos, escolas, cinzeis di- versos. os que por mais antigos parece formarem um primeiro grupo são os dois grandes pratos ( e ) expostos por sua magestade el-rei o sr. d. fernando no armario da sala f e a reproducção electrotypica do museu de kensington ( – ). n’estes exemplares não apparecem ainda claramente as influencias da renascença. as figuras são grandes, desproporcionadas, quasi disformes. e egualmente incorrecto o desenho dos outros ornatos. nos dois primeiros pratos aburidam as palavras portuguezas de letra gothica, e grandes cordões torcidos entre- laçam-se e formam com as suas voltas as molduras dos baixo-relevos. · a fórma, as dimensões, o genero da ornamenta- ção, a distribuição dos ornatos em zonas, o grande numero e adherencia das figuras de homens e de animaes levar-me-hia a classificar no mesmo grupo o grande prato ( ) da collecção de sua mages- tade el-rei o sr. d. luiz, o dos lobos da silveira em reproducção galvanoplastica na sala m ( -a) e o de sua magestade el-rei o sr. d. fernando, sobre o fogão da sala f ( ), se differenças fun- o granceito sr. d. canonlastica no imaginoso na arte da esculptura ou nas suas appli- cações. o artista possuia em alto grau a faculdade da invenção, e, tanto o estylo da renascença como o gothico ou ogival, indifferentemente se lhe presta- vam aos seus devaneios. não quiz cingir-se á obser- vancia rigorosa das regras fundamentaes, nem aos limites que lhe imporia a servil imitação de mo- dêlos. as suas faculdades inteiramente livres e es- pontaneas imprimiam n’estas composições um cara- cter original. affirmei que o prato, o gomil e o calix são attri- buiveis ao mesmo artista. a exuberante e origina- lissima phantasia da ornamentação é já um indicio importante, confirmado pela identidade de certos lavores do bojo do gomil e da copa do calix. ! n'este ultimo o artista não podia deixar de seguir o estylo gothico na forma e estructura do nó e do resto da haste. deu, porém, á ornamentação ogival um caracter novo pela grande phantasia e profusão das arcarias, baldaquinos, corucheus e outros ele- mentos. fez com estes elementos da ornamentação ogival o mesmo que fizera com os da ornamenta- ção da renascença, no gomil d'este mesmo grupo. o prato da sé de coimbra ( ), de estylo muito differente, tem por caracteres principaes os seguintes: nas ondas do mar golphinhos, alguns montados por figuras humanas com azas ou sem ellas. estas e as outras figuras de homens, en grande numero, luctando muitas vezes com animaes phantasticos, armadas de arcos ou de massas, ou tocando instrumentos, são de desenho incorrecto. as chimeras e ramagens, de melhor desenho, en- trelaçam-se miudamente quasi sem deixarem espa- ços intercalares. todos estes caracteres denunciam a industria indiana, e será facil mostrar a analogia da ornamentação d'este prato com a de algumas obras de madeira, cuja proveniencia é conhecida. por estes ou por outros caracteres parecem tam- bem do estylo oriental muitos outros exemplares: os fructeiros ( e ) da sala m, as pequenas salvas da mesma sala ( , , , , ) e a outra analoga de sua magestade el-rei o sr. d. luiz ( ); os fructeiros da mesma collecção ( , e ), os de sua magestade el-rei o sr. d. fernando ( , , , e ); o da sala g ( ); e finalmente a da sala h ( - ). as formas das fi-, guras de animaes e das ramagens poderão ainda levar a subdividir n'outros este grande grupo. uma salva e um fructeiro da collecção de sua magestade el-rei o sr. d. fernando ( e ) for- mam outro grupo caracterisado pela disposição das figuras de ornato, separadas por grandes espaços lisos. a salva tem a data de . finalmente os fructeiros da sala f ( e ), o da sala h ( - ), da sala m ( ) e a salva da mes- ma sala ( -b) constituem outro grupo natural, caracterisado pelos segmentos esphericos lisos ou granulosos, como os da superficie da amora, ou com a forma de pyramides quadrangulares. o do museu kensington foi classificado como obra hespanhola, mas o numero de exemplares ex- postos fazem antes suppor que se deverão attribuir á industria portugueza. n'este grupo sobresae pela belleza e originalidade a salva do sr. d. luiz de carvalho e lorena. restam-nos finalmente na sala m tres pratos ( , e que nem teem similhanças entre si nem com os outros exemplares expostos. sómente o do sr. christiano vanzeller faz lembrar muito de longe o grande e bello prato exposto por sua magestade el-rei o sr. d. luiz, ornado no centro com o brazão do marquez de abrantes. este ultimo, porém, ė obra muito mais perfeita. convirá notar, que tanto aquelle brazão como os outros da mesma familia foram accrescentados no seculo passado. o prato é do seculo xvi. o prato do sr. martinho montenegro ( ) não se assimelha a nenhum dos outros pratos, porém ao gomil da sé de coimbra ( ). o lavor do primeiro é, em verdade, mais fino e delicado, mas a ornamentação da zona exterior tem a maior analogia com a da base do segundo. os me- dalhões e sobretudo as mascaras e cabeças de ho- mens e de animaes, que o artista profusamente em- pregou como elemento decorativo, ein nenhum outro dos exemplares expostos apparecem com o mesmo caracter. a caldeirinha da sé de coimbra, notavel pelas grandes dimensões e pela sua larga facha, decorada com o brazão do bispo d. jorge de almeida e com elegantes arabescos da renascença, parece antece- der um grupo, com o qual só muito de longe se relaciona pela fórma e ornatos da parte inferior do bojo. esta relação, porém, é tão vaga que ficaria desconhecida se não fosse o thuribulo da sé de coim- bra ( ), cujo reservatorio e base têm, posto que em menor ponto, a mesma forma e ornatos. são mais evidentes as relações d'este exemplar com a lampada da universidade ( b) e com a cruz de figueira de lorvão, e por conseguinte com as de pombeiro ( ) e de s. miguel de poia- res ( ). parecerá talvez infundado approximar a lampada a estes objectos. a sua fórma, as suas grandes co- lumnas e alterosa cupula fazem, com razão, lembrar a architectura manuelina, e portanto uma época e um estylo muito differente d'aquelle que se nos de- pára nos exemplares indicados. todavia, quem pozer de parte a forma e atten- der somente á ornamentação, formará de certo um juizo muito differente. o desenho dos ornatos, não obstante a profusão caracteristica das obras ante- riores, é muito menos fino; em alguns bustos até grosseiro, incorrectissimo. por outra parte, os nichos que adornam a parte superior da cupula, os rendilhados e pyramides são extremamente similhantes aos ornatos correspon- dentes do thuribulo da sé de coimbra e da cruz de figueira de lorvão. a esphera armillar alterna-se, como ornato, com as armas reaes na guarnição superior da base da lampada. esta particularidade faria tambem com que se attribuisse ao reinado de d. manuel, se a mesma esphera se não encontrasse na cupula do thuribulo, sem que n'este caso se lhe possa dar aquella significação. antes parece mais um motivo para attribuir ao mesmo artista os dois exemplares. a cruz de s. miguel de poiares tem a data de . a de figueira de lorvão, e por consequen- cia o thuribulo da sé de coimbra, pela similhança da primeira com a segunda, não poderão ser ante- riores a . nas egrejas proximas de coimbra en- contrar-se-hão, talvez, outros exemplares da mesma época e do mesmo estylo. o numero de taes objectos faz provavel a exis- tencia de um ou mais ourives em coimbra no se. culo xvi, que, ainda conservando a tradição de uma época anterior, seriam, todavia, incapazes de impe- dir a progressiva degeneração da arte, egualmente manifestada na esculptura em pedra, cujas obras se tornáram cada vez mais imperfeitas em relação àquellas que produziu a primeira metade do sé. culo xvi nas egrejas de s. marcos, santa cruz e sé velha. estão expostas na sala m seis navetas de prata brancà, todas com a forma de galeão, armado de esporão e com uma ou duas ordens de postigos para a artilheria. do periodo comprehendido entre os fins do se- culo xy e os fins do seculo xvi não se colligiu senão uma outra naveta com forma differente. e uma con- cha de nautilo com guarnições e outras partes de prata doirada. o todo representa uma chimera com cabeça e peito de mulher, azas, corpo e pés de ave. pertence á sé de faro ( ). entre as outras seis ha duas muito notaveis, a de pombeiro ( ) e de condeixa a velha ( ), pelo signal repetidas vezes gravado n'algumas das faces. e o arani ou swastica, symbolo do fogo, tão fre- quente em monumentos da india e em antigualhas pre-historicas da europa. . o numero dos thuribulos do seculo xvi não cor- responde ao das navetas, de certo por se arruina- rem mais depressa com o fogo. ha ainda na sala m cinco exemplares que se agru- pam pela similhança dos ornatos das cercaduras gra- vados a buril, não obstante a diversidade das épo- cas e origens. É o relicario de lorvão ( ), a pedra d'ara do mesmo mosteiro ( ), o pequeno retabulo de prata da sé de braga ( ), e os cofres da mise- ricordia de montemor-o-novo ( ) e da academia de bellas artes ( ). o relicario contém um humero attribuido a um dos martyres de marrocos, é de um é de outro lado miniaturas que representam o martyrio d'estes san- tos, e no reverso o brazão da abbadessa d. catha- rina d'eca. a pedra d'ara, de serpentina verde, é guarnecida na face inferior e nos quatro lados por chapa de prata doirada. n'aquella face tem gravado um bra- zão similhante ao do relicario : nos lados a seguinte inscripção em caracteres gothicos quadrados : esta ara com todas as pecas de infra conteudas mando fazer neste devoto moesteyro de lorvĀao a muy illustre senhora ha senhora dona catherina deca abbadessa do dicto moesteyro. s. ha cruz que ten ho lenho da vra cruz e ho bago e hua portapaz com pedreria e dois castisaes e hu thuribulo com sua naveta e culher e duas galhetas e hu bacio e duas caldeyrinhas com seus ysopos todo esto de prata e ha moor parte das pecas dovradas e mays ovto pontificaes. s. hos tres de broquado e hos outros de seda e dos delles com betas de bro- quado e mais hua vestimenta de broquado e ou- tras tres de broquado e velludo ano d mil dxiiii. os castiçaes a que se refere a inscripção podem ser os de crystal e latão ( ) e uma das caldeiri- nhas a de crystal e prata, adornada de camafeus ( ). o quadro de prata da sé de braga representa o calvario, no estylo das gravuras de alberto durer. na parte inferior estão gravados o brazão e o nome do arcebispo d. diogo de sousa e a data de . o cofre da misericordia de montemor-o-novo, an- tecedentemente descripto, é do anno de . o da academia parece mais dos fins do seculo xv. a chapa gravada da sé de braga não é de certo obra portugueza. uma das obras mais preciosas da sala m, e de toda a exposição é o relicario que foi do convento da madre de deus, perto de lisboa ( ). É este relicario de ouro, decorado de finissimos esmaltes, de ornatos de applicação de filigrana e de pedras preciosas. tem de altura om, e de largura m, . representa um oratorio com a base rectan- gular sobre a qual se erguem quatro columnas qua- drangulares que sustentam a parte superior com a fórma de concha. em cada uma das paredes late- raes vê-se um arco de volta redonda e sobre elle um oculo circular. na parede do fundo está um nicho em que se repete, reduzida, a fórma geral de relicario, e de cada lado uma fresta de volta redonda; dentro do nicho um altar adornado com uma esmeralda, sobre o qual se ergue um tubo de crystal com a reliquia, um espinho, que, segundo a tradição, teria feito parte da coroa de christo, e pertencera a el- feito p. duarternidades na pieanha de em nas extremidades do arco do nicho estão engas- tados dois rubis, e na parte superior da volta um diamante que serve de peanha a uma cruz. no friso do entablamento lè-se 'em caracteres ro- manos a inscripção seguinte: misericordie tve mor- tis gravisime dvlcisime domine iesv xpe resplendor patris concede nobis famvlis tvis. na parte anterior, superior e central do arco tem as armas reaes de d. joão ii e de d. leonor com a corôa e encimadas por uma urna. a volta do arco, representando um meio cylindro, é coberta exte- riormente de escamas esmaltadas: na sua parte superior eleva-se uma urna coberta com uma pe- rola. uma esmeralda e um rubi adornam a primeira a face anterior da base, o segundo o centro parą onde convergem as nervuras da abobada que tem a forma de concha. na frente, na parte inferior de cada columna, está fixo um escudo esmaltado com o camaroeiro, divisa da rainha d. leonor. falta porém já a di- visa do lado esquerdo. atraz na face posterior do arco está representado o calvario em baiso-relevo. na parte inferior, no centro da faxa ornada com esmaltes e ramagens de applicação vê-se um pequeno medalhão esmaltado, representando uma cabeça de mulher, talvez a rainha d. leonor, e em roda uma fila com a ins- cripção seguinte: casa m d. (casa da madre de deus ?). não se sabe do testamento da rainha d. leonor, mas por uns extractos d'este documento, publicados na chronica seraphica, consta que o relicario que fizera mestre joão fôra legado pela rainha ao mos- teiro da madre de deus. quem era este mestre joão ? nos reinados de d. manuel e d. joão hi trabalharam em portugal ar- tistas estrangeiros. alguns eram assim designados pelo seu nome de baptismo, ao qual se antepunha a palavra mestre. É provavel que se refira ao auctor do relicario o seguinte documento que se conserva na torre do tombo: «nos el-rey mandamos a vos joham de saa recebedor da especearia da nusa casa da india e aos sprivães della que des a mestre joham orivez cento e trinta e hum mill quatro centos e trinta réis que lhe mandamos dar em comprimento dos cljiiixxi que lhe sam devidos de feitio da costodia que lhe mandamos fazer pera o mosteiro da comceição de beja porque dos vinte mill reis que falecem pera comprimento leva outro desembargo pera eitor nunes dos quaes tinha outro desembargo para joham de figueiredo que foy roto ao asignar deste. e vos faze-lhe delles bom pagamento em pimenta a rezam de vinte e dous cruzados o quin- tall. e por este com seu conhecimento mandamos que vos sejam leuados em conta. feyto em lixboa a xxb dias do mes de junho affonso figueira o fez anno de mill bxj annos. rey... o recibo está assignado por johan van der staygolstsyt. o nome, que difficilmente se decifra, indica-nos pois um artista flamengo. mestre joão era um compatriota de mestre olivel de gand e de tantos artistas cujo trabalho a grande riqueza da nação pagava bem, e cuja vinda para o reino as re- lações com flandres favoreciam. o documento não é uma prova, mas apenas um indicio. infelizmente a custodia de beja que, pelo estylo, se conheceria ser do mesmo ou de outro ourives, já se não conserva n’aquelle convento. o estylo do relicario, quasi pura renascença, no pri- meiro quartel do seculo xvi, levaria antes a attri- buir esta obra a algum artista italiano. todavia não é impossivel que um flamengo, educado na italia, antecedesse por esta forma os seus compatriotas. na exposição não se encontra nenhum outro exem- plar attribuivel ao auctor do relicario. o relicario da madre de deus, com quanto fabri- cado em portugal, é obra de um estrangeiro e ne- nhuma influencia parece ter tido na arte portugueza. isto mesmo direi de alguns outros exemplares da sala m, cuja procedencia é de certo estrangeira. a pyxide que foi da egreja de nossa senhora da penha de frança e hoje pertence à academia de bellas artes ( ) torna-se extremamente notavel pela ornamentação de ramagens, arabescos, cheru- bins e cabeças de anjos e de satyros. entre as obras de prata levantada e cinzelada esta é unica no de- senho e na perfeição da execução dos lavores. entre os exemplares da ourivesaria estrangeira merece incontestavelmente o primeiro logar o bello calix de ouro esmaltado da sé de evora. o genio de um artista superior manifesta-se claramente na perfeição das pequenas figuras dos baixo-relevos dos medalhões da copa e dos anjos que os sustem, dos seis paineis de nó e finalmente dos gomos da base. a viveza, colorido e variedade dos esmaltes fazem sobresahir ainda mais a perfeição dos baixo- relevos. na parte interna e inferior da base ha um escudo de armas esmaltado e em roda esta inscripção: doct. paulus alphonsus reg. consiliarius in ecctia eboren. archid. et canonicus donavit. anno dñi . a cruz da sé de lisboa ( ), para onde dizem ter vindo do convento de christo de thomar, tam- bem de ouro esmaltado, no estylo muito differente do calix de evora, é todavia uma obra de grande preço. a cruz, que tem com effeito a forma das de christo, firma-se sobre uma peanha á maneira de urna, em cuja base se lè: philippvs. rex. mdlxxxiii. por baixo ha mais um grande pedestal, em cujas faces anterior e posterior estão dois escudos com as armas de hespanha unida a portugal, encimadas por corôas fechadas. a sala m contém numerosos exemplares interes- santes ao estudo dos esmaltes. primeiramente os mais antigos dos seculos xii ou xiii, os relicarios da sé de vizeu ( e ) e as placas da bibliotheca de evora ( e ); depois os esmaltes empre- gados na ornamentação de algumas alfaias do seculo xiv e xv, finalmente os quadros do seculo xvi, e as obras esmaltadas d'este mesmo seculo como o calix de evora e a cruz de que ultimamente fallei. o grande triptyco da bibliotheca de evora ( ) é a obra capital d'este grupo. tem de altura om, e de largura m, . o estylo do desenho e colorido indica ter sido feito na primeira metade do seculo xvi. nenhum signal dá a conhecer o auctor, talvez um dos penicaud de limoges. parecem da mesma época e procedencia os vinte e seis esmaltes ( ) que representam passagens da vida de jesus christo. pertenceram ao sanctuario do mosteiro de santa cruz de coimbra, d'onde passaram em para a academia de bellas artes do porto. são tambem da mesma época os cinco esmaltes do sr. visconde de daupias ( , , , e ). foram attribuidos á industria de limoges, mas, segundo a opinião de pessoas entendidas, de- verão antes considerar-se como hespanhoes. pela sua perfeição parece facil confundil-os com os de limoges. são incomparavelmente superiores aos aragonezes expostos na secção hespanhola. em todos estes exemplares o esmalte constitue a parte essencial. ha porém muitos outros em que se empregou accessoriamente, como ornato. além d'aquelles, já atraz mencionados, citarei ainda uma bella patena de ouro ( ), que pertenceu a um calix de alcobaça, roubado ha muitos annos da bi- bliotheca nacional. uma lindissima miniatura esmal- tada representa a cêa n'uma das faces da patena; na outra christo despregado da cruz, junto d'ella, entre nossa senhora e s. joão. a parte superior da vitrine central da sala m contém joias, algumas de grande valor pela anti- guidade, belleza ou pedras que as adornam. a máis antiga é o fragmento de um collar de ouro ( ), pertencente ao convento de santa clara de coimbra, onde o attribuem á rainha santa isabel. com effeito á fórma do collar e sua ornamentação correspondem muito bem aq seculo xiv e é prova- vel que n'este caso a tradição ande confórme com a verdade. a grande devoção para com a rainha santa, mais de certo que a cubiça do ouro e das pedras ou pe- rolas, tem feito com que do collar não reste mais que esta pequena parte, muito mutilada ainda nas peças de que é feita e que se articulam entre si. logo em seguida está um grande annel abbacial de latão dourado com restos de esmalte verde. no centro tem uma cornalina com mitra e baculo gra- vados, e a seguinte legenda tambem gravada : pe- trvs abbas. outro annel notavel entre alguns que estão aqui expostos é um de prata dourada ( ) com uma cornalina, onde está gravada a figura de um rei coroado, com o sol na mão direita e uma palma na esquerda. no arco foram gravados a buril aos lados da pedra, dois yy, cada um d'elles coroado, como usava el-rei d. joão i nas suas moedas. parece pois ter periencido a este monarcha. É exposto pela sr. d. helena de aragão, e dizem ter sido encontrado perto de alvor. a corôa fechada de oiro ( a), adornada com pedras finas e esmaltes, faz bello effeito pelo con- traste do oiro, diamantes, perolas e cores branca azul e vermelha das rosaceas esmaltadas. foi dada pela infanta d. maria, filha d'el-rei d. manuel, ao convento da luz, d'onde passou para a academia de bellas artes. os brincos ( ) de oiro esmaltado e perolas da sr.& condessa de prime são notaveis pelo tamanho e belleza. dois grandes ganchos, consistindo apenas n'um arame de oiro aguçado na ponta, serviam para os segurar nas orelhas de modo bem pouco deli- cado. a corôa e os brincos são obras do seculo xvi. ao mesmo genero e época pertencem uns cãesinhos de oiro, com esmalte, diamantes e rubis ( ), outro par de brincos de oiro esmaltado com diamantes e perolas ( ), e um alfinete rematado por uma flor de oiro esmaltado com aljofares e uma esmeralda, tudo da sr.a d. maria manuela de brito e castro. parece que todos estes objectos serviram antiga- mente de pregos do cabello, sendo depois adapta- dos aos fins para que hoje servem. são tambem da mesma classe as joias do con- vento de santa maria de almoster: um pingente de oiro que representa uma aguia coroada e adornada com diamantes ( ); um prego do cabello com a forma de lagartixa, adornado com um rubi e tres esmeraldas ( ); outro prego do cabello com a forma de borboleta ( a), adornado com uma esmeralda e diamantes rosas, e finalmente dois pingentes de oiro esmaltado representando um seraphim e um s. joãosinho ( e ). algumas d’estas joias teem certa similhança com as hespanholas da collecção do museu kensington. seriam importadas de hespanha, ou representa- rão os vestigios de uma arte portugueza que, a par com a ourivesaria, deve ter tido grande desen- volvimento no seculo xvi? eis uma pergunta inte- ressante que em face da exposição se formúla, mas a que se não pode responder. em l'ortugal ha de certo ainda muitas joias d'aquella época que não vieram á exposição, e que, reunidas com as outras expostas, de certo nos dariam alguma luz sobre este ponto tão obscuro como interessante. eis aqui uma joia que tem todo o caracter, todo o espirito do seculo xvi. É um pingente de oiro es- maltado. um cavalleiro, de maça em punho, cavalga um golphinho agigantado, seis ou oito vezes maior do que elle. com a maça levantada e todo inclinado para traz, a sua attitude é de querer vibrar rijas pancadas contra o collosso. duas cadeias suspen- dem o golphinho pela cabeça e pela cauda. É do mesmo genero um pingente de prata esmal- tada do sr. almeida santos ( ). a parte central representa em alto relevo um cysne montado por cupido, sobre fundo azul com estrellas de oiro. adornam a moldura, muito relevada, perolas, rubis e diamantes. a dureza do cinzel e a pouca transpa- rencia das cores suscitam algumas duvidas acerca d'este exemplar. será genuino ou uma imitação? merecem tambem attenção tres relicarios: um da sr.a marqueza de alvito ( ), outro da sr. vis- condessa de daupias ( b), outro, finalmente, da sr.a d. marianna fischer berquó ( ). o primeiro é uma cruz de crystal com engastes e ornatos de oiro esmaltado, n'uma das faces tem a imagem de christo, na outra a de nossa senhora, que dois an- jos corôam. o segundo é uma capsula oval acha- tada, que tem dentro a imagem de s. josé, com guarnição de filigrana de oiro e perolas à roda, e por fóra outra guarnição mais larga de filigrana. o terceiro, emfim, é de oiro. n’uma das faces tem a trindade, na outra nossa senhora; faz lembrar, pelo estylo, o relicario exposto por sua magestade el-rei o senhor d. fernando e assignado por david. o da sala m tem gravadas interiormente estas pa- lavras rio janr. com estas joias está exposto um pequeno relogio de crystal e latão doirado do museu portuense e duas bellas miniaturas, retratos de duas damas, com o seu estojo de ferro com um brazão cercado de bandeiras dispostas de tal forma que fazem lem- brar a ornamentação gothica. estas miniaturas fo- ram do arcebispo d. manuel de cenaculo, que as deixou em evora com a sua bibliotheca. nos vãos inferiores das vitrines estão alguns ob- jectos de ferro antigos e doze pratos de latão com baixo-relevos nos centros e alguns com inscripções gothicas em flamengo. estes pratos bem como a ba- cia de latão e gomil com a forma de leão, expostos por sua magestade el-rei o senhor d. fernando, parece terem sido fabricados, como outros muitos objectos congeneres, em dinant, nos fins do se- culo xv ou nos principios do seculo xvi. estes pra- tos são muito communs nas egrejas antigas de por- tugal. teem talvez a mesma procedencia as campai- nhas de bronze, tambem numerosas, das quaes ha quatro exemplares na vitrine central da sala m. viii a sala n entre os exemplares da sala m e os da sala n não ha uma completa separação. faz-se insensivel- mente a transição de uns para outros, e para con- stituir certos grupos naturaes hão de reunir-se os seus membros dispersos pelas duas salas. aqui estão na mesma vitrine da sala m dois cali- ces ( e ) de alturas differentes, porém tão extremamente similhantes em tudo o mais, que nin- guem deixará de attribuil-os ao mesmo ourives. en- tram naturalmente no mesmo grupo os calices de nossa senhora da esperança de lamego ( ), e de santo andré de poiares ( ), ambos da sala n. outro grupo, tambem do estylo da renascença, mas com grandes differenças da forma e da orna. mentação, comprehende o calix de santa justa ( ), cujo nó é ainda gothico, os da academia de bellas artes de lisboa ( e ), todos da sala m, e os calices da mitra patriarchal ( ), e da sé de elvas ( ) da sala Ñ. dois d'estes calices teem datas, o da academia ( ) deve ter pertencido á sé de coimbra, como se prova pelos brazões do bispo. d. jorge de al- meida, que adornam a base; pelos rotulos, com a sua conhecida divisa : nequid nimis; e, finalmente, pela seguinte inscripção : este cales deixov o bispo don iorie dalmeida ao santo sacramento da sÉe era de . no da mitra patriarchal ( ) leem-se as datas de e . differem muito d'estes dois grupos, pelos caracte- res da forma e da ornamentação dois calices (g — e g-- ) expostos por sua magestade el-rei o se- nhor d. luiz, e os da egreja de belem ( ) e de santa cruz do funchal ( ), ambos da sala n. o calix de oiro da sé de coimbra ( ) assime- lha-se na ornamentação da base aos do segundo grupo; mas o nó tem a fórma caracteristica do ter- ceiro: um corpo hexagono, formado de paineis com os seus nichos, e separados uns dos outros por co- lumnelos. o calix da sé de coimbra ( ) tem na parte inferior e interna da base o brazão do bispo d. joão soares, que governou a diocese conimbri- cense de a . a custodia de trevões ( ) assimelha-se muito aos calices da mitra de lamego e da capella da uni- versidade de coimbra na ornamentação da base. · porém a sua fórma, e particularmente da cupula que lhe serve de remate, é tão differente de todas as outras, que não sei se poderá attribuir-se à ou- rivesaria portugueza. as custodias de santa clara de coimbra ( ) e do convento de s. domingos de odivellas ( ) da sala n, das francezinhas ( ) da sala d, e o reli- cario da sé. de coimbra ( ) da sala m, parecem obras do mesmo ourives, e dos fins do seculo xvi. as das maltezas de estremoz ( ), dos conven- tos do paraizo ( ) e de santa catharina de evora ( ), e da egreja de s. francisco de guimarães ( ). assimelham-se aos calices do terceiro grupo na fór- ma e ornamentação do nó. poderão attribuir-se estes exemplares aos fins do seculo xvi, ou aos princi- pios do seculo xvii. a um periodo mais adiantado d'este seculo pertencem a custodia de santos o ve- lho ( ), da misericordia de cascaes ( ), da egreja das mercès de lisboa ( ), todas da sala n, e outra da egreja de entre as vinhas de mertola, exposta na sala k. a pyxide de santos o velho ( ), do mesmo es- tylo da custodia da mesma egreja ( ), determina a época do ultimo grupo. lê-se, com effeito, na base da pyxide : esmola de dom lviz dalencastre conde de vila nova com.dor mÓr da ordem de avis. ora este conde de villa nova de portimão nasceu em e morreu em . havemos, portanto, de attribuir esta custodia e outras similhantes å se- gunda metade do seculo xvii. a cruz da academia de bellas artes ( ) é uma das obras mais notaveis da ourivesaria do seculo xvi. a base, de forma rectangular, assenta sobre um plintho similhantemente rectangular com as super- ficies todas cobertas de baixo-relevos, e com os quatro angulos apoiados sobre cabeças de toiros. n’uma das quatro faces do plintho representa-se a foz de um rio entre duas margens com fortalezas; na face opposta um naufragio; n'outra o rapto de europa; n'outra, finalmente, um centauro arreba- tando uma mulher, e um homem disparando fre- chas contra elle. ornam os angulos figuras de phan- tasia. os baixo-relevos das quatro faces verticaes da peanha ou base representam a prisão de christo, a oração no horto, a via dolorosa e o ecce homo. a cada um dos quatro angulos encosta-se uma chi- mera com cabeça e peito de mulher e azas. nas quatro faces superiores outros baixo-relevos repre- sentam outros passos da vida de christo. rama- gens, flores e fructos decoram as faces da cruz, da anterior das quaes pende a imagem de christo. tudo n'esta obra notavel está indicando um artista supe- rior da primeira metade do seculo xvi. nem ha na exposição outro exemplar com o qual tenha affini- dade. apenas os porta-paz ( ) da sala m e ( e ) da sala n teem com ella alguma longinqua similhança, principalmente o ultimo, em cujo re- verso está gravada a data de . os ornatos gra- vados a buril no reverso d'este e de outro porta- paz são caracteristicos da época e, pelo phantasioso do desenho, approximam ainda mais estes exem- plares da cruz da academia. entre os cofres da sala n merece o primeiro logar o da academia de bellas artes ( ). É de bronze doirado com ornatos de prata branca. adornam as quatro faces do cofre dez paineis em baixo-relevo, representando passos da vida de christo, separados uns dos outros por pilastras decoradas com esta- tuetas. É de forma rectangular, muito elegante, e apoia-se sobre quatro leões. talvez não seja impossivel encontrar algumas ana- logias entre este cofre e aquelle que sua magestade el-rei o senhor d. luiz expoz na sala g, e que per- tenceu a el-rei d. sebastião. a similhança, porém, é mais evidente entre este ultimo cofre e o de odi- vellas ( ), cujos baixo-relevos teem maior analo- gia com os do cofre da sala g, sendo-lhe, comtudo, inferior nas dimensões, no desenho geral e no par- ticular das figuras e ornatos. o cofre da mitra patriarchal ( ), com fórma similhante, porém com ornamentação muito diffe-. rente, tem a data de . se aos cofres mencio- nados accrescentarmos os de prata, gelatina, tarta- ruga, madre-perola, ebano, etc., expostos nas varias salas da exposição, e em maior numero nas salas m, ne , convencer-nos-hemos da impossibilidade de qualquer classificação natural. a razão está em que estes objectos vieram, pela maior parte, de fóra do reino com reliquias, faltando-lhes para isso o nexo que teriam se fossem obras da industria portugueza. as pyx.des do seculo xyli teem caracteres proe- minentes pelos quaes facilmente se differençam: na sala n as de santos o velho ( ) e da sé do fun- chal ( — b); na sala f outras duas ( e ); na sala g, finalmente, outra ( ). os fructeiros de prata levantada são as obras mais numerosas e mais caracteristicas da ourivesa- ria portugueza durante o seculo xvii. com effeito, a este seculo pertencem os que em grande numero foram expostos na sala n. apenas de poucos será licito duvidar se não serão antes dos fins do se- culo xvi. estão n'este caso os dos srs. marquezes de monfalim ( , e ); e talvez tambem as terrinas e pratos do sr. bento de queiroz ( e ), e do sr. d. luiz de carvalho e lorena ( e ). os seis fructeiros do sr. francisco manuel fra- goso ( e a ), e o do sr. joão de castro sampaio ( ) formam outro grupo, que, pela or- namentação das ramagens e fitas entrelaçadas e pelos baixo-relevos dos medalhões centraes, se dif- ferençam bem do primeiro grupo. assimelham-se antes aos fructeiros francezes do tempo de luiz xiv. as bandejas da sr.a condessa de rezende ainda mais se distanciam dos fructeiros portuguezes. as duas mais bellas ( e ) e de mais perfeito ?e tos portrende ainda - desenho são obra estrangeira, como attesta a ins- cripção gravada n'uma d'ellas: j. a. thelot. . este thelot, auctor de outras obras de prata, colli- gidas na exposição, será o andré thelot, ourives de augsburgo, que viveu de a e fabricou algumas das mais notaveis peças do thesouro de dresde? a ornamentação das outras duas bandejas de prata levantada ( e ) é mais grossa e incor- recta e, por algumas pequenas analogias que tem com a dos fructeiros, poderá ser talvez obra da industria peninsular, mais provavelmente da hespa- nhola que da portugueza. a época d’estas ultimas parece corresponder aos fins do seculo xvii. finalmente outro grupo de fructeiros compre. hende exemplares de lavor menos perfeito, como é o da sé de lisboa, cujo medalhão central representa um galeão. muitos dos fructeiros expostos na sala f pela sr.a condessa d'edla entram naturalmente n'este grupo. cinco jarros de prata branca ou doirada, de va- rias dimensões e ornatos, mas todos com fórma si- milhante, parecem caracteristicos do seculo xvii. o mais bello, pela profusão e delicadeza dos ornatos, é o do sr. fernando palha ( ). o do sr. antonio teixeira de sousa ( — a) tem gravado na aza o seguinte: a. m. parecem productos de uma in- dustria estrangeira, hollandeza talvez. um outro jarro, o da mitra de lamego ( ), po- derá menos duvidosamente attribuir-se à industria nacional. a fórma da aza d’este jarro é como a das azas de outros expostos na sala . muitos exemplares da sala n tem uma ornamen- tação commum que parece carecteristica do seculo xvii. os arabescos, as fitas entrelaçadas, os pon- teados substituem sem vantagem nenhuma, excepto a da simplificação do trabalho, os ornatos em relevo. na cruz do sebal grande ( ), com a data de , apparece já este genero de ornamentação. encontra-se egualmente nas lampadas do convento do paraizo de evora e do sr. bento de queiroz ( ); na cruz da egreja da ameixoeira ( ); na estante de prata do convento das chagas de lamego ( ); no relicario da sé de coimbra ( ); no prato do sr. bento de queiroz ( ) na caldeirinha do convento da castanheira de villa franca ( ; e finalmente nas bacias ou fructeiros do sr. macario de castro ( ) e da sr.a d. umbellina julia da costa ( ). este ultimo tem por medalhão central a effigie de filippe ii com a seguinte legenda : phi- lipvs iii. hispaniar. rex. estes dois fructeiros e ou- tros dois da sr:a condessa d'edla, expostos na sala f, parecem obras do mesmo ourives, portuguez ou hespanhol, não obstante o nome allemão da seguinte legenda que circumda n'um dos ultimos a effigie do medalhão central : anna mavr ellaoldofredi d ise aet x... a ourivesaria conimbricense, que no seculo xvi parece ter produzido alguns dos exemplares da sala m, poderão attribuir-se os objectos de prata das egrejas de s. bartholomeu e de s. christovão. a lanterna da primeira ( ) tem a seguinte inscri- pção : estas alinternas derÃo os irmÃos que prin- cipiarÃo a irmandade no anno de . a lanterna, ( a), vara de mesario ( b), cruz processional ( ), cereaes ( ), thuribulo ( ), naveta ( ), capa de campainha ( ) de s. chris- tovão de coimbra e a corôa ( ) do convento de semide, a corôa ( ) de santa clara representam provavelmente aquella industria local. a lanterna de s. bartholomeu tem a data de . as outras obras parecem approximar-se mais dos principios do seculo xvii e são mais perfeitas. a degeneração da arte, começando na segunda me- tade do seculo svi foi proseguindo, arrastando por fim a sua completa extincção. o caracter local dos objectos attribuiveis á indus- tria coninbricense tornar-se-ha mais apparente, se os compararmos com outros de egrejas distantes de coimbra, por exemplo as lanternas de s. christovão e de s. bartholomeu com a da egreja de s. pedro de almargem do bispo do concelho de cintra ( ). onde muito bem se desenha o estylo da ourivesa- ria portugueza do seculo xvii é na sacra da egreja de santa maria de belem ( ), na pia de agua benta do sr. flamiano lopes ferreira dos anjos ( ) e no baixo-relevo do sr. joão alegro ( ), que representa um milagre de santo antonio. a sacra de belem assimelha-se por extremo aquella que foi exposta na sala f pela sr.a condessa d'edla. outras duas obras do mesmo genero, posto que de maiores dimensões e de mais larga ornamenta- ção, adornam as paredes da sala n. É o frontal da confraria de s. josé do funchal ( ) e a porta do sacrario da egreja de santa maria de belem ( ). esta porta de sacrario é de madeira coberta de folha de prata levantada, representando em baixo- relevo a adoração dos reis. na parte inferior en- tre grandes folhagens tem as armas reaes de por- tugal e por baixo o seguinte letreiro: principe d. pedro qve deos gvarde dev este sacrario a este real mosteiro de belem no anno de . segundo um documento publicado pelo sr. r. v. d'almeida, o sacrario de belem foi feito pelo ouri- ves joão de sousa, em cumprimento de um voto das chagas é muito elegante e muito bem ornamen- tada. contém a sala n, alguns exemplares da industria indiana. em todos se conhece claramente o caracter oriental. o crucifixo de santa clara de coimbra ( ), de pau santo, cobre dourado e marfim, ainda hoje é conhecido n’aquelle convento sob a denomi- nação de senhor da india. as columnas da peanha são perfeitamente orientaes. conserva-se outro com uma peanha similhante na capella da quinta do sr. marquez de vallada em cintra. parecem obras dos fins do seculo xvi ou principios do seculo xvii. o oratorio ou triptyco da academia de bellas artes, outr'ora do convento do carmo da vidigueira, é outro exemplar interessante ( ). forrado de velludo verde com peanha e remate de prata, é exteriormente adornado de guarnições e fechos de prata e de medalhões pintados em molduras do mesmo metal. no fundo está um crucifixo com a imagem de ouro e com peanha de prata. aos lados tem as imagens da virgem e de s. joão, de prata; nas paredes lateraes dois santos da ordem de s. francisco; nos reversos das portas s. pedro e s. paulo. trouxe-o da india para o convento o padre andré, coutinho, que falleceu em . representam tambem a industria indiana uma estante de missal ( ) e um porta-paz ( ) da academia de bellas artes e que egualmente perten- ceram ao convento do carmo da vidigueira; uma cruz d'azeviche da sé de coimbra ( ) e duas imagens de nossa senhora, feitas de dente de ca- vallo marinho, uma dos srs. marquezes de monfa- lim ( ), outra da egreja de trevões ( ). esta ultima é notavel pela sua grande belleza e pela per- feição da esculptura. o thuribulo da sé de coimbra ( ) da sala m parece tambem obra da industria indiana. ha outro similhante n'aquella sé. são ambos de forma es- pherica, suspensos em trempes com pés de cabra. a ornamentação consiste em grandes carrancas cir- culares em que parece se pretendeu representar o sol. não se conhece nenhum outro exemplar d'este genero. ix a sala o a transição da sala m para a sala n é quasi in- sensivel. além de que, por falta de espaço, passa- ram para esta ultima muitos exemplares do seculo xvi, a maior parte dos da segunda metade d’este seculo não se differençam por caracteres proeminen- tes dos da primeira metade do seculo seguinte. o estylo da renascença, generalisa-se n'aquelle pri- meiro periodo e continua durante o segundo sem alterações profundas. uma barreira porém parece separar a sala n da sala . os objectos aqui expostos são com raras excepções do seculo xyili, e em quasi todas as clas- ses da ourivesaria o estylo se modificou profunda- mente nos principios d'esse seculo ou nos fins do anterior. esta modificação affecta não somente a fórma geral dos objectos, mas tambem o desenho e o genero da ornamentação. ao passo que algumas obras se differençam das anteriores por uma elevação notavel do estylo, ou- tras, pelo contrario, patenteiam uma inferioridade grande na forma e na ornamentação, preferindo-se ( e ) da sala n, os baixo-relevos do sr. marquez de pombal ( e ) da sala , e outro similhante com a mesına data de na sala , pertencente á academia real das sciencias ( ). os pratos de germain tem a sua assignatura e as datas de e . entre os exemplares da ourivesaria estrangeira da sala , merece tambem mencionar-se a urna da sr.condessa de geraz de lima ( ). a cafeteira do sr. carlos munro ( ) e a chaleira do sr. joão de castro sampaio ( ) tomar-se-hiam como obras estrangeiras, se não houvesse na sala o outros exemplares que parecem obras do mesmo ourives ( , , e ). com estes exemplares não podem competir os da ourivesaria nacional, cuja decadencia, começando no seculo xvii, continuou progressivamente até hoje. citarei, como termos de comparação, a lampada do sr. manuel barata de lima tovar ( ), os jarros e bacias, urnas, bules, salvas e outros objectos ex- postos na sala . as peças de um apparelho de chá, do sr. josé maria de alpoim ( a ) tem certa originalidade. são de prata dourada cobertos de ornatos de appli- cação de prata branca, representando parras e ervas, mas executadas sem grande delicadeza. não tenho até agora fallado das marcas da ouri- vesaria, porque são extremamente raras nos exem- plares das salas me n. encontram-se n'alguns, poucos, da sala . o l coroado, marca de lisboa, apparece no castiçal da sé d'esta cidade ( ), na cafeteira dos srs. duques de palmella ( ), nos objectos de um serviço de toucador da sr. d. maria manuela de brito e castro ( , , etc.). o p, marca do porto, no jarro dos srs. rosas ( ) não te porque se me coroados a cidade meter na cafeteira e leiteira do sr. abilio augusto martins ( a e ), na cafeteira do sr. bento de queiroz ( ), na urna ou cofre da sé do porto. É possivel que alguns d'estes exemplares tenham já sido fabri- cados no seculo xix. as peças com a marca de lisboa são em geral mais elegantes e com ornatos de melhor desenho e execução. convém sobre tudo notar os objectos ci- tados da sr.a d. maria manuela de brito e castro, os quaes, sem a marca, se tomariam facilmente como obras estrangeiras. É instructiva e curiosa a comparação dos objectos da mesma classe chronologicamente dispostos nas salas m, n e . as custodias ogivaes ou de colum- nas ornadas de estatuetas, da primeira e da se- gunda metade do seculo xvi, modificam-se no seculo xvii, adquirindo em geral fórmas mais grossas e pesadas. os relicarios conservam ainda a forma rectangular, mas as columnas retorcem-se ás vezes na forma denominada salomonica; e aos lados appa- recem as quartellas á maneira de ss. a custodia da annunciada de setubal ( ), com a data de , conserva ainda esta forma. porém nas ontras da sala , o relicario perde a forma re- ctangular, para tomar a circular ou de resplandor, caracteristica dos seculos xviii e xix, e tão pouco elegante que vulgarmente lhe chamam de palmatoria. o resplandor com a haste faz com effeito lembrar este instrumento. algumas custodias do seculo xviii são adornadas com pedras preciosas, ás vezes de mistura com ou- tras falsas. estão na sala as da bemposta (hoje da academia de bellas artes) ( ) e da estrella ( ). ha outras porém, como a da sé de lisboa, que não figuram na exposição. o luxo que el-rei d. tremamente elegantes na forma e com bellos e de- licados ornatos, são obra do mesmo ourives que fabricou as da sr.a condessa d'edla, ( e ) ex- postas na sala f. deveriam ter sido antes collocadas na sala mou n, por corresponderem pelo estylo aos fins do seculo xvi ou principios do seculo xvii. são menos antigas mas tambem de grande belleza as do extincto mosteiro de jesus de aveiro ( ) e as da mitra episcopal de coimbra ( ). no relicario de mafra ( ), de ebano e prata, nota-se o defeito commum da esculptura contempo- ranea; tem grande exageração as estatuetas em posições muito affectadas. de uma grande banqueta de prata da sé de coimbra, constando de cruz, castiçaes, apostolos e jarras, figuram na sala duas d’estas ultimas ( ), de forma e ornamentação simples e elegante. as outras peças, de grande peso e dimensões, são obras muito menos perfeitas, pelo que não vieram para a exposição. nas salas me n, e na primeira mais ainda que na segunda, predominam as obras da ourivesaria religiosa. na sala o desapparece já este predomi- nio, e os exemplares da ourivesaria civil não são inferiores em numero ás alfaias do culto. duas causas explicam esta differença. nos seculos xvi e xvii a arte religiosa produzia mais do que a arte civil. por outra parte as obras d'esta ultima não estavam nas condições que favoreciam a conserva- ção das alfaias ecclesiasticas. no seculo xviii aug. mentou a producção das primeiras, além de não haver ainda decorrido o tempo sufficiente para a sua desapparição. os objectos de uso domestico participam dos de- feitos notados nos outros. parece ter diminuido a faculdade inventiva dos artistas que produziu as obras magnificas da renascença. não ha variedade de fórma nem de ornamentação, que se reduz, na maior parte dos exemplares, a alguns singelos lavo- res à roda de grandes superficies lisas. a singeleza dos jarros e bacias, tão numerosos na sala , con- trasta com a esplendida ornamentação dos gomis e pratos do seculo xyi, e com as grandes e profusas ramagens dos fructeiros do seculo xvii. duas bellas miniaturas, uma do sr. francisco xa- vier de carvalho ( ), outra do convento do co- ração de jesus, estrella, lisboa ( ), são acom- panhadas de notas manuscriptas, que attribuem a primeira a tibaldi ; a segunda a josé alyres, roma, , pertencem ao sr. visconde de daupias tres baixo- relevos em marfim ( , e ). um repre- senta christo crucificado, s. josé, s. francisco, santo antonio e outros santos. e obra do seculo xviii. os outros representam assumptos biblicos, sendo um a matança dos philisteus. estes ultimos são de bellis- sima esculptura dos fins do seculo xvi, ou dos prin- cipios do seculo xvii. a sr. viscondessa dos olivaes expõe dois peque- nos baixo-relevos, em dente de cavallo marinho, re- presentando scenas da vida de moysés ( e ). o sr. josé do canto, um triptyco de marfim, que representa em baixo-relevo a familia sagrada, e dos lados, nas portas, s. miguel e um anjo conduzindo uma creança ( ). outro baixo-relevo de marfim, da mitra archi- episcopal de braga, representa sete passos da vida de christo, e parece obra indiana ( ). * finalmente, a sr.& d. maria amalia cabral expõe uma annunciação, em marfim e madreperola, deli- cada esculptura do seculo xvm ( —b),'e a sr.a d. clara maria de mesquita, um baixo-relevo em marfim com a inagem de nossa senhora, obra da mesma época. uma collecção de joias dos seculos xvii e xviii, pela maior parte d'este ultimo seculo, serve de com- plemento ás collecções de ourivesaria das salas n e . estas joias, em geral, productos de uma arte enervada, não teem já a graça, a elegancia, a vida dos objectos analogos do seculo xvi, particularmente d'aquelles que represeatam lutas ou outras scenas de homens e de animaes. o altar do sr. francisco ribeiro da cunha ( ), e uma camara de sant'- anna e de s. joaquim, do sr. henrique de araujo tavares ( ), não obstante as pedras preciosas que os adornam e a perfeição das miniaturas do pri- meiro, mostram claramente a differença entre a arte do seculo xvi e' a do seculo xviii. pertence a primeira, mais do que á segunda, e deveria por isso ter sido collocada na sala m, uma cruz de prata doirada toda revestida de filigrana de prata branca. a saia que o christo veste e as ini- ciaes da parte superior da cruz, que algum tanto conservam ainda das fórmas gothicas, dão a este exemplar maior antiguidade do que a primeira vista pareceu. eis aqui tres rosarios, genero que a industria dos seculos xvii e xviii deixou numerosamente re- presentado. o mais notavel é o do extincto con- vento de jesus de aveiro ( ), de filigrana de oiro. pertenceu a esse mesmo convento um adereço de prata com amethistas e diamantes ( ) e um bello collar de diamantes ( ). da caixa geral dos de- positos procede outro collar d'este mesmo genero ( ). d'ahi mesmo vieram grande numero de brin- cos de oiro esmaltados de verde e ornados de pe- rolas ( , , , , , , ), produ- ctos da mesma industria no seculo xvii, ou no se- culo xviii. a sr.d. marianna guilhermina fisher berquó expõe um pente de oiro, feito da folha d'este me- tal, levantada á maneira da folha da prata nos fru- cteiros e n'outras obras do seculo xvii. É dos srs. condes de prime uma bella miniatura em cobre esmaltado, retrato do cardeal mazarin. no reverso tem esta nota manuscripta : le card. ma- zara in zme peinture de dalila labarchede elÈve de mr. soiron pÈre. paris . as medalhas de prata ornadas de perolas e pe- draria para retratos, foram muito communs no se- culo passado. muitas ha expostas tanto na sala , como na sala g. a mais bella de todas é a do sr. bento de queiroz ( ), exposta na sala . tem uma elegante firma de brilhantes na parte superior, entre as joias mais interessantes ou curiosas d’esta collecção mencionarei o peitoril de diamantes, da academia de bellas artes ( ), e o collar de fili- grana de oiro e de antennas de insecto, do mosteiro de lorvão ( ). dois pequenos instrumentos de prata dos srs. mi- guel osorio cabral de castro e francisco de abreu castello branco, parece terem servido de borrifado- res, da mesma sorte que os que actualmente usam os barbeiros, excepto em ser substituida pela insu- flação boccal a da borracha que impelle o ar. com effeito estes singulares objectos teem a forma de um vaso ou de um coração ôco. no gargalo en- tra um tubo que desce até ao fundo e que tem na parte superior um crivo. exteriormente ha outro tubo recurvado que sảe da parte inferior do vaso. contendo este uma porção de liquido, e assoprando pelo tubo exterior, o liquido, impellido pela pres- são do ar, deve sair, com mais ou menos força, em gotas pequenissimas, pelo crivo. finalmente resta-me citar uma linda cruz peito- ral de crystal e oiro, da mitra de aveiro. esta e uma grande parte das joias expostas na sala são attribuiveis à industria estrangeira. a sala e desejando dar uma noticia exacta da collecção de ceramica da sala e, pedi ao sr. fernando palha, or- ganisador d'esta collecção, que a descrevesse. sa- tisfez de tal modo o meu amigo e collega ao pedido que lhe dirigi, que só receio que a sua extensa, mi- nuciosa e interessante carta, a par com as minhas, não demonstre a insufficiencia d'ellas pela brevidade com que tratei de algumas das collecções da expo- sição. eis a carta : q... sr. dr. augusto filippe simões. — orde- na-me v. que escreva uma abreviada noticia da collecção de ceramica exposta na sala e, para v. me fazer a honra de a publicar juntamente com os seus ultimos trabalhos sobre a exposição de arte ornamental. a tarefa que v. me impõe é superior ás minhas forças e de todo me julgo insufficiente para ella, mas sendo a ordem sua não posso des- obedecer. supprirei com boa vontade os conheci- mentos que me faltam, como já o fiz quando se tra- tou de organisar a collecção. nas resperas da abertura da exposição, quando vi como n'ella a ceramica estava pobremente repre- sentada, fiz sentir esta falta ao sr. presidente da commissão executiva, e insinuei-lhe que, mesmo n'aquella occasião, seria facil obter dos principaes colleccionadores de lisboa um numero sufficiente de objectos que, expostos na sala e, inutilisada até ali para a ceremonia da abertura, viriam preencher uma lacuna que eu não era o unico a notar. s. ex.a abraçou a idéa com enthusiasmo, me pareceu en- tão, e perguntou-me se eu estava disposto a consul. tar os amadores de que fallava, meus amigos pela maior parte; acceitei immediatamente a incumben- cia, e tendo começado logo a minha peregrinação, tive a satisfação de achar em toda a parte as por- tas abertas de par em par. julgava eu que a minha missão terminaria no mo- mento em que viesse dizer á commissão que os srs. fuão e fuão punham as suas collecções ás or- dens d'ella, pois nunca tive a ousadia de pensar que vv. ex.as delegariam em mim, tão sem titulos, o pe- sado mas honroso encargo de collaborar na sua obra. foi, pois, com espanto que, tendo sido chamado å presença da commissão, ouvi dizer que eu propu- ‘zera organisar na sala e uma collecção de ceramica, promptificando-me a assumir todas as responsabili- dades, e a desempenhar todos os trabalhos que dis- sessem respeito a esta amplificação da exposição. como já disse nunca tal föra a minha idéa, porque não me achava habilitado para tanto, mas receiando, se o contestasse, que a minha recusa fosse interpre- tada como desejo de demittir de mim responsabili. dades, ou de me furtar ao trabalho, querendo por esta forma lançal-o sobre homens que, como v., ha- via tantos mezes, e ainda então, o tinham tão grande, calei-me e acceitei a missão com que vv. ex.as me honravam. achando-me desarmado para a bem desempenhar, sem tempo para preencher com o estudo as defi- ciencias dos meus conhecimentos, estudo que, como v. bem sabe, em materias d'esta natureza de nada vale sem a experiencia, recorrí ao unico expediente que o bom senso aconselhava: consultar aquelles que eu considerava mestres e que tinham o que me fal- tava, a pratica. assim fiz; em todos achei boa von- tade, mas muito especialmente no distincto amador e meu amigo o sr. osborne sampaio, que não só me franqueou a sua preciosa collecção, mas em tudo me ajudou, encaminhou e aconselhou. se alguma coisa ha que louvar na exposição de ceramica, sobretudo na sua disposição, é a elle que os louvores devem ir buscar e não a mim, porque em tudo lhe obedeci. da mesma forma se mais de mil objectos pode- ram ser colleccionados, dispostos e catalogados em pouco mais de um mez, devo-o a v. e aos seus collegas, vogaes da commissão executiva, que por- fiáram em aplanar os obstaculos que se me levan- táram no desempenhar a minha tarefa; devo-lhes por isso reconhecimento; bem vê pois que um de- sejo seu não pode deixar de ser ordem para mim. se no obedecer esta segunda vez commetter er- ros palmares como o fiz na primeira (e alguns for- nece-me v. agora occasião de rectificar), queixe-se da sua obcecada confiança e reconheça ao menos a minha boa vontade. merecem pela sua antiguidade occupar o primeiro logar n'este trabalho, como o occupáram, no cata- logo, os sete vasos etruscos da collecção dos du- - ques de palmella. hoje as imitações perfeitissimas que en italia se fazem tornam mui difficil para to. dos o determinar a authenticidade d'estes vasos, muito mais para quem, como eu, estranho até hoje á estes trabalhos, não teve occasião de educar o olho nos museus a differençar o verdadeiro do falso. comtudo a collecção dos duques de palmella julgo-a isenta mesmo da mais leve suspeita ; basta conhe- cer-lhe a origem. foi adquirida em roma por d. ale- xandre de sousa holstein, pae do primeiro duque de palmella e nosso ministro n'aquella côrte, onde morreu em , e n'esse tempo ainda a industria dos falsificadores não tinha chegado á perfeição que lamentamos. julgo, pois, que os vasos da casa val- mella devem pelo menos ter vinte a vinte e um se- culos, pois, segundo os auctores que tratam o as- sumpto, a fabricação d’este genero terminou annos antes de christo. · se não receiasse ser taxado de atrevido, diria mesmo que ainda são mais antigos, pois creio que não se podem classificar como do periodo da deca- dencia, e que pertencem a classe que jacquemart designa pelo caracteristico das pinturas vermelhas, datando a sua fabricação do quarto seculo antes da nossa éra. o processo porque estão ornamentados é tal e qual o que o sabio historiador da ceramica descreve : desenho das figuras com um ponteiro no barro, intervallos preenchidos com fundo de esmalte preto, e traços pretos a pincel completando o de- senho; em alguns o emprego da cor vermelha e do branco não altera a classificação. juntando a isto a elegancia das formas, que a arte moderna póde egualar nunca exceder, e a sobriedade dos orna- tos, julgo poder affirmar estarmos em presença de specimens distinctos d'esta remotissima fabricação. - - - - --. - o espirito humano pasma diante d’estas reliquias, quando .considera que, feitas da materia a mais fra- gil, poderam escapar incolumes aos cataclysmos que destruiram ou arruináram o forum e o colyseu. a par dos vasos gregos da casa palmella, e se- guindo-se-lhe tambem no catalogo um grande prato de faiança de urbino abre brilhantemente esta sec- ção, e temos n'elle a joia mais preciosa da collecção exposta na sala e. É tambem dos duques de pal- mella. obriga-nos a dar um salto de muitos seculos e a deixar as épocas remotas anteriores á nossa éra, e em que tudo é escuridão e incerteza, em que as mais trabalhadas classificações não passam de hy- potheses, que só inspíram confiança aos que teem sciencia bastante para acceitar como verdadeiros os dados em que se baseiam. achamos-nos com o prato dos duques em plena renascença italiana e mesmo muito proximos da se- gunda metade do seculo xvi. em ceramica, como em tudo mais, a italia acordou mais cedo do que o resto da europa do lethargo em que as artes jaze- ram por tantos seculos, mas ao passo que a pin- tura, a esculptura, a architectura attingiam ainda no seculo xv o seu maior esplendor, só no xvi vi- veram e trabalharam os grandes mestres da cera- mica, os xantos e os fontanas, pois os robbias, lucca e andréa, mais eram esculptores do que olei- ros. viu-se n'aquella época a mesma rivalidade de que o seculo passado nos deu o espectaculo, quando os principes da europa, em pacifica contenda, fize- ram consistir a sua gloria em fabricar nos seus es- tados as mais delicadas porcelanas, então os papas, os duques, as republicas, os simples condottieri, as- sim como porfiavam em roubar uns aos outros os raphaeis e os miguel angelos, assim protegiam os artistas mais modestos que nas suas côrtes, vinham fabricar as esplendidas majolicas que a industria moderna, apezar dos poderosos recursos de que dispõe, em vão tenta imitar. chaffagiolo, sienna, florença, asciano, monte lupo, faenza, forli, ri- mini, ravenna, bologna, pesaro, castel durante, urbino, gubbio, deruta, ferrara, genova, veneza, napoles, e omitto os nomes de outras tantas, segui- ram o impulso. um dos primeiros logares, senão o primeiro, pertence a urbino, onde se illustraram francesco xanto e orazio fontana. em portugal são rarissimos os exemplares d'estes productos, e pou- cos conheço. de todos o mais notavel é este prato dos duques de palmella, que contribuiria para illus- trar as mais afamadas collecções. são raras, mesmo nos museus, as obras assigna- das de oragio fontana. () monogramma que n'esta se encontra, composto de um e um f entrelaçados precedendo um v (oragio fontana, urbino) é dado por chaffers como do mestre, comquanto jacquemart o omitta. se um esmiuçador tão paciente como o escriptor inglez não tivesse classificado a marca como sendo de fontana, bastava este prato para se lhe dever attribuir, pois reune todos os caracteristicos dos seus artefactos: a largueza e correcção de de- senho, o vigor do colorido e o brilho imcomparavel do esmalte. na anatomia dos personagens que figu- ram n'elle está-se a reconhecer o pincel que dese- nhou o pastor da taça do museu do louvre, que representa o roubo de europa e que jacquemart reproduz na sua obra. não me atreveria a escrever com tanta certeza se não tivesse visto o meu juizo confirmado por mestres illustres que não me atrevo a citar, e ainda por um testemunho não pedido nem procurado e que por isso mais auctoridade tem. quando eu estava trabalhando no catalogo entrou um dia na exposição um illustre amador inglez, o sr. maniac, que possue uma collecção afamada, e que depois de estar em lisboa, onde vinha procurar um clima ameno, soube por acaso que a exposição estava aberta; tal foi a publicidade que teve este para nós importantissimo acontecimento que um amador apaixonado, vindo para portugal nos principios de março, ignorava antes de cá chegar que vinha encon- trar reunidas tantas preciosidades. mal este illustre viajante entrou na sala e e teve tempo de abraçar com um golpe de vista as cantoeiras e vitrines, veiu sem hesitar direito ao prato de urbino, attrahido por elle como o ferro pelo iman. vendo-me a escre- ver os bilhetes do catalogo perguntou-me quem era o dono, e como eu lh’o dissesse e accrescentasse que tinha a assignatura de fontana, respondeu-me: — não a precisava. qual é o assumpto que o artista quiz representar na sua obra ? e para mim bastante obscuro. no ca- talogo apresentei a hypothese de que o gigante que tantos estão subjugando figurasse a italia vencida e dominada pela austria. hoje, depois de mais madura reflexão, parece-me mais razoavel vêr n'aquelle monstro a discordia, a quem arrancáram seus attri- butos, o feixe de serpentes, e que os soldados do imperador, armados de raios, tratam de aniquilar; nos mortos e fugitivos do primeiro plano o partido vencido, os francezes talvez, caracterisados pela ven- toinha, emblema da versatilidade e ligeireza, de que em geral os accusam; finalmente no personagem a quem offerecem duas chaves, symbolo da submissão, carlos v, porque a bandeira da sua casa triumphante, não me consente deixar de ver na obra de fontana uma homenagem ao poderoso vencedor de francisco i. além d'isto conhece-se que o prato é dedicado ao mesmo personagem a quem se offerecem as chaves, pois o mesmo individuo que lh’as apresenta, esten- de-lhe tambem a outra mão em que se lê a assigna- tura do artista. coincidem com o começo da fama de fontana em as tregoas de nice assignadas por carlos y e francisco i e que vinham dar novas esperanças de paz e prosperidade á estafada italia. não quereria o artista celebrar o acontecimento? sabemos de mais que não foi só fontana que celebrou com seus tra- balhos as victorias do imperador; jacquemart cita uma peça importante representando a tomada de goletta feita em urbino em por francesco silvano; é mais um facto a favor da minha hypo. these. como hypothese a apresento e, attendendo á im- portancia do specimen e a estas incertezas, pedi ao meu amigo o sr. luiz de aragão que pela gravura o reproduzisse, para que outros que não lograssem vel-o possam estudar o assumpto e rectificar o meu parecer. longe, bem longe d'este specimen unico e precioso estão todos os mais exemplares que na collecção representam as faianças italianas. nem por isso dei- xam de ter interesse, mas como me falta o espaço e tempo não me deterei n'elles e só por lembrança os menciono. genova, savona, napoles estão repre- sentadas com exemplares de épocas relativamente modernas, pois não são de certo anteriores ao seculo xvii, se d'elle datam, e todos de fundo branco e pintura azul, especialidade das fabricas de genova que as outras imitaram. o catalogo, ao deixarmos a italia, leva-nos para sentiernas, polle datam idade das rentes generos dos seus artefactos, pela maior parte influenciados pelas porcelanas orientaes, que o com- mercio dos portuguezes e sobre tudo dos hollande- zes viera espalhar na europa. se os artistas de rouen tiveram a primeira idéa d'estas imitações, como jacquemart parece insinuar, sendo seguidos n’este caminho pelos outros centros de producção da frança e pelos proprios hollandezes, ou se a es- tes, que em primeira mão, em todo o seculo xvii, recebiam as louças da china e do japão, pertenco a iniciativa, é ponto que não me atrevo a decidir, apezar das probabilidades serem todas a favor da segunda hypothese. o caso é que os artistas normandos souberam, apezar de imitadores, crear typos proprios, e uma ornamentação sui generis que, recordando o gosto oriental, não se pode confundir com elle. tal é o ge- nero chamado de lambrequins de que é um bom specimen o jarro em forma de capacete que o sr. osborne sampaio expoz e que o catalogo descreve com o n.º . o n.º immediato pertence ao genero caracterisado pela cornucopia de flores, motivo prin- cipal da sua ornamentação; o exemplar, de forma original e curiosa tem todas as qualidades e os de- feitos d'este genero; qualidades no colorido, bri- lhante e bem matisado, defeitos na massa e sobre tudo no esmalte d’um branco azulado pouco agra- davel. querem os que tratam o assumpto vêr n'este typo dos productos de rouen uma tentativa bem succedida de emancipação da imitação servil dos productos orientaes. no n.° , assucareiro branco com paisagens chinezas a cores, temos ainda outro specimen de faiança normanda, d'um genero em que a imitação das louças orientaes ainda foi mais servilmente procurada. conheço pouco as faianças francezas, sou n'estes assumptos um mero principiante, por isso não é de estranhar que desconfie das minhas impressões, e que a medo as consigne aqui, mas como quero so- breludo sêr sincero direi que, do que tenho visto d'estes productos, julgo que como imitações da por- celana oriental ficaram muito abaixo das hollande- zas. jacquemart diz que a escola de rouen desde os seus começos soube imitar a porcelana chineza com uma fidelidade e um talento ao menos igual ao que se admira nos oleiros hollandezes. É possivel que se eu conhecesse as grandes collecções de faiança de rouen partilhasse a opinião do illustre traladista, até hoje nunca me succedeu tomar uma peça de rouen por china, ao passo que por vezes me tem sido necessario approximar-me e examinar bem vasos de faiança azul de delft para lhe conhe- cer a origem. o que digo do fabrico de rouen muito melhor se pode dizer dos artefactos de nevers, e não serão as duas garrafas de forma persa, descriptas com o n.º e espostas tambem pelo sr. sampaio, que, apezar da distincção das formas, modificarão o meu juizo. o esmalte embaciado e excessivamente azulado e a côr azul sem vigor empregada na ornamentação, fazem com que não haja illusão possivel. tambem creio que a primeira fabricação de gar- rafas d'esta forma, que tão frequentemente se en- contra em faiança de dellt, se deve aos hollandezes, e que d'elles a imitáram os fabricantes de nevers. como se sabe houve desde tempos remotos na hollanda o gosto pelo cultivo das tulipas, gosto que chegou a tocar na monomania, pois os amadores do genero não duvidavam pagar por preços loucus uma nova variedade d'aquellas cebolas, creio mesmo que houve mais de um exemplo de se terem com- mettido crimes para obter o exemplar desejado, quando não se podia adquirir por sacrificios pecu- niarios. ora a forma das garrafas de que fallamos é a mais apropriada para fazer germinar aquellas tão cobiçadas plantas; logo que foram conhecidas foram assim utilisadas, e eis a razão porque tão frequentemente se encontram em faiança de delft. ainda os vasos de pharmacia, tambem do sr. os- borne sampaio, descriptos com os n.os e , e a floreira dos duques de palmella, que tem o n.° , mais se podem dizer inspirados pela porcelana orien- tal do que imitados d'ella, não deixando por isso de serum specimens notaveis sobretudo pelas suas for- mas elegantes. não me espanta o encontrar em frança esta in- capacidade para a imitação. em todos os tempos a indole dos seus artistas mal se amoldou a copiar ar- tefactos estranhos, e, se alguma poderosa corrente vinha de fóra influenciar as predilecções do mo- mento, se os artistas não podiam resistir-lhe, sabiam mesmo n'esses artefactos, devidos a alheias inspira- ções, imprimir o gosto tão distincto e tão inimitavel da arte franceza; assim aconteceu quando da italia a renascença veiu revolucionar o mundo artistico, assim aconteceu quando a ampliação do commercio do oriente veiu introduzir uma nova influencia na industria europea. estava reservado para o nosso seculo ver em frança uma pleiade numerosa de artistas e indus- triaes applicar o seu talento na imitação servil dos · artefactos de outras épocas e de outros paizes, e conseguirem-n'o, para tormento dos colleccionado , res e para fortuna de negociantes menos escrupu- losos. as fabricas do sul da l'rança não seguiram os exemplos das do norte, os seus productos longe de imitarem modelos estrangeiros teem em tudo o cu- nho nacional, tanto na forma como na ornamenta- ção; quando não tinham artistas especiaes copiayam as composições dos mestres nacionaes que se pres- tavam a ser reproduzidas em objectos de pequenas dimensões, como são as do originalissimo calot, ou as de berain e de boulle. são specimens d'este ge- nero os n.ºs e tambem da collecção do sr. sam- paio. a terrina descripta com o n.° tem uma or- namentaçãe grotesca no genero de calot, e se é de joseph olery pertence à segunda época da sua fa- bricação, quando de volta de hespanha, para onde tinha ido por instigações do duque de aranda, co- meçou a ornamentar as suas faianças com as côres que vira usar nas fabricas hespanholas. se é de joseph olery, disse eu, porque, segundo a opinião de jacquemart, o monogramma formado pelas letras l , que se lê na bandeira que segura um macaco, não é prova sufficiente para se attri- buir a este artista as peças em que se encontra. comtudo um dos factos que aponta para motivar a sua duvida não se dá n'este caso, que é o encore trar-se o monogramma acompanhado sempre por ou- tras e mui variadas letras; aqui encontra-se des- acompanhado, e o sitio em que está pintado mais parece indicar a assignatura de um artista do que a marca de uma fabrica. a travessa que tem o n.° ostenta desenhos graciosos no genero bérain, se não copiados do pro- prio artista. as suas composições, frequentissima- mente reproduzidas em moustiers, servem para ca- racterisar numerosos productos d'esta procedencia, . e este exemplar, com quanto não seja de summa importancia, é bem proprio para os que quizerem conhecer o genero fixarem os seus caracteristicos. terminarei o que tenho a dizer sobre as faianças francezas mencionando as tres terrinas descriptas com os n.ºs , e . são todas tres specimens notaveis do genero que em marselha teve tanta voga, da pintura de flores sobre fundo branco, e repro- ducção de animaes em relevo nasazas e tampas. a ultima tem uma marca desconhecida e que po- derá de hoje em diante augmentar o elenco das mar- cas d'esta proveniencia. tambem de marselha, ou de um dos centros de fabricação que imitáram seus productos, é o ser- viço que o sr. macedo braga expoz, e tem o n.º . a facilidade com que estão desenhadas as paisa- gens e figuras que entram na sua ornamentação, o brilho das côres com que estão pintadas, tornam-n'o um exemplar distincto de um genero que pode com- petir em elegancia com a porcelana mais finamente pintada. antes de fallar das faianças hollandezas direi duas palavras do unico exemplar que na sala e repre- senta as fabricas belgas. É o n.º que me per- tence e que até ha pouco tive em casa sem o poder classificar. É uma cabeça de javardo perfeitamente modelada e pintada com uma só côr, cinzento azu- lado; a parte superior forma tampa, e devia servir de terrina ou simplesmente de ornato. desconhecendo completamente este genero de faiança, ainda hoje não saberia a proveniencia do meu javardo, se ha pouco, folheando o livro publicado depois da expo- sição retrospectiva belga, e que se intitula — l'art ancien à l'exposition nationale belge — não deparasse com um exemplar perfeitamente egual reproduzido pela gravura. bom seria que a nossa exposição ins- pirasse um trabalho similhante onde se reproduzis- sem sobretudo aquelles objectos que ainda não fo- ram descriptos em outras publicações, o que serviria para de futuro auxiliar os estudiosos e sobretudo os que tomam interesse pela arte portugueza. já tive occasião de me referir á influencia que julgo dever attribuir as faianças hollandezas sobre as do norte da frança, dando-lhes o exemplo da imi- tação das porcelanas orientaes e servindo-lhes de modelo n’este genero de fabricação. que á hollanda pertence n'ella a precedencia parece-me difficil de contestar. depois dos portuguezes, e d'estes falla- rei a seu tempo, nenhum povo da europa deve ter tido mais cedo o conhecimento das porcelanas orien- taes. não é pouco provavel que, nos tempos em que os reis de portugal tinham em flandres um feitor permanente, consignatario obrigado das mercado- rias da casa da india, para as quaes anvers era quasi o mercado exclusivo e ao mesmo tempo ne- gociador de quanto emprestimo a corôa portugueza se via obrigada a contrair, e eram frequentes nos tempos chamados da nossa prosperidade, alguma loiça da india lá devia ter ido parar, não como ob- jecto de commercio mas como presente ou luvas para os poderosos argentarios que durante tantos annos dispozeram do mercado monetario. não foi, de certo, esta a unica origem da introducção na hol- landa de porcelana da china e do japão; ainda no tempo da feitoria, e sobretudo depois d'elle, as re- lações commerciaes de portugal com os seus por- tos eram frequentes, conservadas, principalmente, pelos judeus portuguezes, que a politica fanatica e cubiçosa dos nossos soberanos tinham obrigado a refugiar-se em terra de mais liberdades, e que tão fundas raizes tinham lançado em portugal que ainda hoje conservam vestigios da sua origem, e que n'es- ses tempos tendo deixado entre nós parentes e ami- gos provavelmente alimenta vam estas relações com presentes de parte a parte. os que de cá fossem póde-se affirmar à priori que continham jarras da china ou do japão. mais tarde, quando os aconteci- mentos de auctorisáram as naus hollandezas a equiparar as quinas aos leões de castella, bem depressa, supplantando-nos no commercio oriental, começaram a importar directamente as desejadas mercadorias. logo em já era tão manifesta a vantagem do commercio do oriente que os estados julgáram dever fundar a companhia das indias, des- tinada a tão prolongada prosperidade, e em , só doze annos depois, os mesmos estados conce- diam a claes janssen wytmans o primeiro privi- legio conhecido para o fabríco de porcelanas pouco mais ou menos como as que vinham de paizes re- motos. este facto o que indica? que os primeiros pro- ductos importados, tendo tido geral acceitação e não podendo pelo seu preço e limitado numero satisfa- zer a todos os pedidos, a industria nacional come- çou a procurar nos proprios recursos o meio de sa- tisfazer o gosto do mercado. a porcelana tornou-se ainda no seculo xvii um dos principaes artigos que compunham os carregamentos da companhia, basta lembrar que só em , em duas remessas, intro- duziu nos seus depositos : peças, e n'outro anno um só negociante, wagenaar, recebia : de porcelana branca, mas é provavel que nos seus começos a abundancia não fosse esta, e como então sobretudo a procura devia ser immensa, como o é sempre para novidades, o estabelecimento da nova industria fez-se em condições verdadeiramente ex- que fuecida, pelo aspo os mo cepcionaes. eis a origem das faianças de delft imi- tando porcelana oriental. n'estas imitações foram os hollandezes eximios e, repito-o, julgando pelo que conheço, ninguem os egualou. a faiança pintada de azul, e não é o genero mais estimado dos seus productos, pelo brilho do esmalte que quasi lhe chega a dar o aspecto da porcelana translucida, pela côr que em nada differe da dos modelos, e pelo aspecto geral da ornamentação chega a illudir mesmo os mais praticos. d'este ge- nero tenho na sala e quatro exemplares que julgo se devem classificar como bons specimens e que seriam de primeira ordem se infelizmente não tives- sem alguns defeitos, filhos do tempo e do pouco cuidado, com que em geral entre nós estas cousas eram tratadas. são as garrafas de forma persa des- criptas com o n.° e os dois potes que tem os n.os e . se não fosse o detalhe do desenho, que não resiste a uma ligeira analyse, pois nunca um artista europeu foi capaz de pintar um chinez como os chinezes se pintam a si proprios, assim como es- tes apezar da proverbial exactidão na copia nunca foram capazes de retratar um europeu que não pa- reça um chinez, se não fosse, digo, esta circum- stancia, a pequena distancia, a illusão seria completa, para os maiores entendedores, como o é, mesmo com os defeitos que tem, para os que o são menos. para o provar basta contar o que succedeu com as peças a que me refiro. pertenciam a uma antiga casa de vianna do cas- tello, onde de ha muito se lhe tinha perdido a lem- brança da origem, e eram considerados de louça da india. quando, por morte da ultima representante da familia, um dos co-herdeiros mostrou desejos de as obter para o seu quinhão, e lhes deu o ver. dadeiro nome, para todos foi surpreza ouvirem que as louças que desde crianças chamayam da india não passavam de faianças hollandezas, e era tudo gente acostumada a porcelana oriental. as fabricas de delft não se contentaram com imi- tar a porcelana azul da china, mais ambiciosas bem depressa tentaram ornar os seus productos com o verde, o encarnado e o oiro dos modelos que tinham debaixo dos olhos, e, se como imitação ficaram muito áquem dos resultados obtidos com o primeiro ge- nero, comtudo conseguiram crear uma decoração de côres brilhantissimas, harmonicamente matisa- das; se o esmalte excessivamente opaco, e o tom falso dos fundos não viessem contrabalançar estes resultados a illusão seria pelo menos igual a pro- duzida pela faiança azul. o pote n.° e a fructeira do sr. francisco ribeiro da cunha que tem o n.o são exemplares distinctos do genero, e tem a marca que o dr. mandi, um dos mais distinctos col- leccionadores de faianças hollandezas restituiu a cornelis keyser, jacob e adrião pynaker, que tra- balharam nos fins do seculo xvii a datar de e que a todos excederam pelo brilhante colorido de seus artefactos. . d'elles tambem e unico specimen d'um genero ainda mais estimado, que os amadores designam pelo nome de delft doirado, por isso que n'elle o oiro veiu juntar-se as cores verde, azul e vermelha, na decoração das faianças são os dois pequenos ca- nudos que o sr. osborne sampaio expoz com o n.º . pertencem ao typo caracterisado pelo desenho chamado da codorniz, porque n'elle figura esta ave. terminarei dizendo que as faianças de delft, es- timadas desde os seus principios, merecem ainda orientaes, enquanto não conseguiram destruir em granada a ultima capital do seu longo dominio, a raça dos vencidos, que fora tão cultivada, que fizera da hespanha a mimosa patria de todas as industrias, de todas as artes, apezar de decadente, não deixou de exercer a sua influencia sobre os rudes vence- dores, modificando-lhes os costumes, a industria, os proprios ritos do culto aborrecido, e n'esse tempo a louça era arabe como tudo mais. mas logo que as ambições de carlos v, a sua elevação ao throno im- perial, as pretensões que herdara do pae vieram desviar as forças da hespanha para a italia, onde em amiudadas pelejas se discutia não só a posse do milanez mas o dominio do mundo, quando os gene- raes do imperador tanto se chamavam hernando de avallos como prospero colonna, quando era o titiano que tinha a honra de legar á posteridade o sem- blante carregado do carcereiro de francisco i, então os modestos artistas que em talavera começaram a exercer a sua industria tentaram imitar os artefactos que de urbino, de faenza e d'outros centros da italia chegavam até à côrte do seu soberano, home- nagem às suas façanhas que celebravam. mais tarde, depois de vencida nos campos de enghien a velha infanteria hèspanhola, quando com luiz xiv a casa de bourbon conseguiu substituir se nos destinos da europa á da austria em plena decadencia, quando sobre tudo entrou em hespanha com filippe v, o engodo pelas modas, pela elegancia, pelas artes francezas vemos que alcora nasceu d'essa nova cor- rente de ideas. as faianças de talavera estão bem representadas na sala e. dois dos exemplares os n.os e jul- guei podel-os attribuir ao seculo xvi e devem re- montar á época em que os artistas, ainda hesitantes, comquanto não podessem resistir ás influencias es- tranbas, não tinham perdido de todo o gosto pela or- namentação arabe que até então fora o nacional. no n.° , do sr. osborne sampaio, as côres são as empregadas pelos grandes ceramistas italianos, o azul, o verde, o amarello, ou por outra são d’ellas o pallido reflexo porque lhes falta o vigor e o brilho incomparavel dos esmaltes italianos; os anjos que figuram na ornamentação são italianos tambem, fa- zem lembrar os que esculpia donatello com as per- nas defendidas com armaduras; o resto é arabe; são os passaros, as corças, as plantas mil vezes variadas, mil vezes reproduzidas na mesquita de cordova ou no alcazar da alhambra. no prato des- cripto com o n.º , tambem do sr. sampaio, ainda é mais evidente a influencia arabe, pois se não fosse uma pequena egreja pintada n’um dos lados ninguem poderia affirmar que o artista que o decorou fosse um artista christão. demais, os productos de tala- vera, apezar de inspirados pelas faianças italianas, tiveram sempre um cunho proprio e originalidade nos ornatos e sobre tudo nas formas, nacionaes com raras excepções. além d'isto a indole das duas fa- bricações era bem diversa; os fontanas, os xantos; verdadeiros artistas, só empregavam seus pinceis em peças de apparato, pratos, taças ou gomis, destina- dos a ornamentar os palacios dos poderosos mecenas, os oleiros de talavera trabalhavam para o povo, os seus artefactos eram destinados para as necessida- des domesticas e é certo que as quartas e cangirões, que hoje se conservam em museus, muitas vezes foram á fonte ou serviram em roda para encher as canecas dos freguezes d'algum taberneiro das cas- tellas. a maior parte das formas são as que já an- teriormente tinham sido adoptadas para uso diario e que ainda hoje se empregam; outras menos sim- ples têem um aspecto original e um cunho proprio; taes são as do candelabro exposto pelos duques de palmella com o n.° , provavelmente destinado a alumiar algum altar, e a caneca dos mesmos srs. que tem o n.° . os assumptos reproduzidos na ornamentação va- riam. uns representam costumes populares, toscas paisagens, caçadas um tanto phantasticas : taes são o n.° dos duques de palmella, em que dois sol- dados com os trajos á luiz xili, da época, fraterni- sam, os n.° , , dos mesmos srs., os , do sr. sampaio e o da academia de bellas artes em que se podem vèr caçadas á lança e com galgos, combates de animaes e paizagens. outros, mais eruditos, se assim se pode dizer, vestem os seus personagens á romana, como no n.º em que dois cavalleiros fazem lembrar a estatua equestre de luiz xiv, ou vão buscar á mythologia os modelos dos seus, como se vê no n.º do sr. sampaio; e accrescentarei que este prato se distingue entre os outros exemplares da exposição, pois além do vigor extraordinario do colorido, a correcção com que está desenhado parece indicar sêr devido a um verdadeiro artista. nos productos de alcora o cunho nacional mui difficilmente se percebe. vê-se que a industria que alli floresceu foi transplantada do estrangeiro e que os artistas que o duque de aranda soube attrahir para a aperfeiçoar lhe imprimiram um typo estranho que nunca mais abandonou. se os seus artefactos co- meçaram ainda no seculo xvii não sei; os que d'elles tenho visto teem todos o cunho do seculo passado. mesmo nos exemplares evidentemente destinados ás necessidades das classes populares como é o can- girão descripto com o n.º , e os pratos que tem os n.os e todos do sr. sampaio, a influencia dos modelos, das modas e predilecções francezas são evidentes; no n.º que pertence a um typo vul- garissimo tres personagens turcos fazem lembrar os que moreau le jeune desenhou para illustrar as tragedias de voltaire; são turcos de convenção não são turcos da turquia. os artefactos mais perfeitos chegam a confundir-se com os das fabricas do sul da frança a ponto de ser difficil muitas vezes dif- ferençar uns dos outros, e de existirem nas collec- ções com a designação de moustiers ou marselha quando são de alcora ou vice-versa. como não teem marca a maior parte das vezes, a classificação é difficilima. está n’este caso a terrina que expuz com o n.° que, apezar da sua forma purissima do estylo luiz xv, os tropheos correctamente desenha- dos no mesmo estylo e gosto francez, a natureza do esmalte, mais brilhante do que o de marselha, me fez classificar como de alcora. ainda notarei a fonte do sr. osborne sampaio descripta com o n.º que, de forma completamente franceza, está or- nada com ramos de flores devidos de certo ao pin- cel de um artista de merito. para terminar este rapido passeio pelas faianças expostas na sala e resta-me fallar dos productos attribuidos á fabrica real do rato. se nos pertence como vulgarisadores um capitulɔ na historia da ceramica, em compensação a cera- mica portugueza não tem historia. estou bem longe de seguir o exemplo, hoje tão frequente, dos que se desvanecem com o mais insi- gnificante objecto logo que julgam poder-lhe altri- buir origem nacional, e que, desprezando como indi- gnos de louvor os mais finos productos das industrias que julgam poder mais ins gnos origem nacional, estranhas, enchem a bocca com :- e portuguez, muito interessante —, servindo assim de pretexto para os desapaixonados nos attribuirem vaidades e ignorancia, que felizmente nem de todos é apana- gio. conheço que lhes vou excitar as iras, mas é mal a que já estou acostumado. apezar de escrever com a exposição de arte ornamental aberta julgo não faltar á verdade dizendo que não somos nem nunca fomos um povo de artistas. ha factos que vão de encontro a esta opinião, fa- ctos que se chamam a batalha, thomar, belem, a custodia dos jeronymos, a cruz do funchal, etc.; são excepções que, como sempre, não destroem a regra. a excepção na ceramica portugueza chama-se a fabrica do rato. É verdadeiramente uma excepção? quasi que nem isso é. uma industria exercida por artistas estran- geiros, copiando modelos estrangeiros, que viveu o que vivem geralmente as tentativas d’este genero dos soberanos e dos ministros, quando não vem acu- dir a uma necessidade real, só porque foi exercida sobre o solo portuguez, com a vil materia prima portugueza, e braços inconscientes portuguezes tam- bem, pertence à historia do trabalho portuguez? custa-me a responder affirmativamente. em todo o caso, tal qual foi ou como se quizer con- siderar, enxerto mal succedido, ou acclimação pros- pera ainda que ephemera, a fabrica do rato é o unico estabelecimento ceramico portuguez cujos productos merecem ser notados. a sua historia está por es- crever. se não fosse o gosto da nossa época pelo bric-à-brac, que tem salvo do esquecimento tantas reliquias do passado, provavelmente a sua existen- cia não seria conhecida senão por algum curioso que desejasse saber a razão porque a rua da fa- faiança. É o que nos conta ratton, e quando a enu- mera juntamente com os outros estabelecimentos que com ella nasceram, diz: - fabrica de loiça á imitação da que vinha de frança, cuja fabrica deu algum lucro, mas por estar mal collocada e se ha- verem estabelecido muitas outras no reino, e parti- cularmente pela opposição que lhe fez a loiça in- gleza se veiu a fechar. comtudo d’esta fabrica, de que foi mestre um italiano, saíram officiaes que ainda se empregam com bastante utilidade publica. É curto o paragrapho, mas precioso. diz-nos qual foi a idea que presidiu ao estabelecimento da in- dustria e a quem se encarregou a execução, e co- nhecidos estes dois pontos estão explicadas as duas influencias, tão diversas, que predominam nos arte- factos. de facto abundam nas loiças attribuidas á fabrica real objectos que á primeira vista parecem ter saído dos fornos de rouen; pertencem ao ge- nero chamado de lambrequins, e se não fosse uma incorrecção no desenho e uma deficiencia no esmalte, aos mais praticos seria difficil classifical-os, faltando, de mais a mais, a marca da fabrica em quasi todos, senão em todos, os productos d’este genero, talvez de proposito para illudir o consumidor acostumado a fornecer-se de loiça franceza. na collecção da sala e um só objecto, o n.º , terrina que per- tence ao sr. osborne sampaio, serve para exempli- ficar o genero, mas está exposto na sala k, entre outros objectos, um taboleiro pertencente á acade- mia real das sciencias, que faz hesitar os mais co- nhecedores. a par d'este genero, que provavelmente foi aquelle a que de principio se dedicou a fabrica, como o in- dicam as palavras de ratton, encontramos um sem numero de objectos em que a influencia do mestre italiano é manifesta; taes são todos os de loiça branca, sem pintura alguma, em que se attendeu sobretudo á fórma. a fabrica devia ter á sua dis- posição um modelador de primeira ordem, porque em quasi todos os productos d'este genero nada ha que criticar. taes são as estatuetas expostas por sua magestade el-rei o senhor d. fernando na sala f com o n.º , e que não deshonrariam os artistas de capo di monte, taes os bustos expostos na sala e com o n.° , copiados, julgo eu, de modelos de machado, expostos pelo sr. antonio maria fidié, o do n.º , a bacia e jarro que o sr. osborne sam- paio expoz, e que teem o n.° , e outros que omitto. ainda a par d'este genero apparecem productos do rato que não podem facilmente dizer-se copia- dos de modelos estrangeiros, e que constituem uma especialidade da fabrica; taes são a gallinha que ex- puz com o n.º , o pato, que tem o n.° , e as celhas, dos duques de palmella, expostas como n.° . o mais distincto artefacto attribuido á fabrica real, exposto na sala e, é com certeza a terrina perten- cente á academia real das sciencias e que tem o n.° . copiada evidentemente de alguma peça de baixella de prata, não me espantaria se viesse a saber que na casa real existe o modelo, pois assim como constitue uma excepção entre os productos da mesma origem, assim posso suppor que o modelo deveria ter a marca de um dos mestres francezes da escola de germain, pois o estylo é purissimo; no mesmo caso está o espelho que a sr. condessa d'edla expoz na sala f com o n.° e em que se está a vêr um d'esses que acompanhavam as caixas e bandejas dos toucadores das elegantes do tempo. factos isolados, objectos, d’esta ordem só depun- ciam o capricho, quer do artista que os modelou para offerecer a algum poderoso patrono, quer do principe que se lembrou de fazer executar em ma- teria tão fragil o modelo que possuia, nunca podem servir para d'elles se induzir que a officina donde sairam se dedicou seguidamente á fabricação d’um genero em que a perfeição da mão d’obra não está d'accordo com a vileza da materia prima. tambem considero excepcional e devida talvez ao pincel de algum dos artistas da época, a travessa que o sr. osborne sampaio expoz com o n.º e que artisti- camente decorada se afasta muito da incorrecção com que são pintadas quasi todas as peças da mesma origem, e por isso julgo que na sua execução en- traram elementos que não eram os ordinarios da fabrica. ratton escreveu em e diz-nos que n'essa época já a fabrica real tinha fechado, não podendo resistir á concorrencia ingleza e á das outras muitas que no reino se estabeleceram. d'essas muitas poucos vestigios restam, a não ser que se lhes deva attribuir a maior parte dos obje- ctos que até hoje se classificavam como do rato. de facto poucos são os que tem a marca e, se não acon- tecesse achar-se em objectos perfeitamente eguaes, difficil seria determinar-lhes com certeza a origem. comtudo não estou longe de suppôr que alguns pertencem as fabricas que faziam concorrencia á do rato ou se devem aos officiaes que de la saíram quando fechou. conheço na vidigueira um grande serviço de jantar, com numerosas peças quasi todas de formas elegantes, que alli existe desde vinte ou trinta annos antes do fim do seculo passado, e que pintado de azul no genero rouen, reproduzindo as fórmas d'aquella procedencia, é de uma execução tão tosca que não se lhe pólle assignar esta origem, nem tão pouco se pode dizer ser do rato, pois tem numerosas marcas não conhecidas, comquanto se possa affirmar que é portuguez, attendendo á na- tureza do barro e esmalte. a fabrica real do rato não tinha razão de ser, não era viavel. como industria destinada a prover as classes populares, não era com mestres e opera- rios estrangeiros que poderia produzir tão barato que lhe não faltassem os consumidores; nas classes medias tinha a lutar com as importações inglezas e sobre tudo chinezas, mais baratas e mais perfeitas, pois, como é sabido, ainda ha poucos annos a por- celana ordinaria de cantão era a que se via em quasi todas as mesas portuguezas; como fabricação de luxo vinha tarde, quando a europa inteira 'estava a fabricar as mais preciosas porcelanas e diante d'ellas tinham já abaixado bandeiras os fabricantes de faiança. consolem-se pois os que lamentam a sua ruina lembrando-se de que só á custa de conti- nuados sacrificios se poderia ter evitado. os resul- tados não os compensavam a porcelana oriental e europea está profusamente representada na sala e. esta profusão tem a sua razão de ser. n’uma exposição retrospectiva de arte ornamental, destinada a fazer conhecer a historia da arte d’um povo ou d’uma raça, o intelligente orga- nisador deve, quanto possivel, procurar que se achem representados todos os objectos, que, desti- nados ás necessidades multiplas do homem, servi- rão ao mesmo tempo de pretexto ao habil cinzel do ourives, ou ao delicado pincel do decorador. só as- sim poderá o estudioso reconstruir o viver dos pas- sados, no templo, na rua, e na casa. se a arte na- nos tempos em que na europa os banquetes dos opulentos eram servidos em artisticas majolicas ou em baixellas cinzeladas por alguns dos mestres da renascença, em portugal estas alfaias eram devidas å industria dos orientaes, e esta preferencia ainda hoje dura. póde-se pois dizer, ainda que a asserção tenha o seu sabor paradoxal, que a louça portu- gueza é a louça da china. bem nossa é ella, e se o patriotismo póde des- culpar a exagerada estima de objectos de pouca importancia e nenhum valor artistico, justificadissi- ma estava a numerosa collecção da sala e, se eu podesse concordar em que o merecimento dos ob- jectos n’ella reunidos, não basta para o fazer. se é justificado o orgulho do povo que se honra por con- tar entre os seus filhos um raphael ou um cellini, não o é menos o d'aquelle que conta entre os seus maiores um gama ou um albuquerque. os frescos do vaticano, as taças ou os punhaes que restam do grande cinzelador recordam ao italiano o seculo de leão x, recordam-lhe que o talento dos artistas da sua patria os habilitou a tratar como de egual para egual com as testas coroadas, e fez da italia a pa- tria das artes; as colchas e os contadores da india, a louça da china e do japão lembram em quasi to- das as casas portuguezas, que a audacia, o talento, á tenacidade dos nossos navegadores patentearam å europa mais de meio mundo; pois ainda que a maior parte dos objectos que hoje se conservam em portugal estejam longe de datar da época gloriosa em que os galeões das quinas davam a lei d'aqui até as mais remotas ilhas do extremo oriente, e se. jam devidos a importações recentes, a ignorancia dos seus possuidores consente-lhes poder attribuil-os ao quinhão que pertenceu a algum capitão illustre nos ramente assassinados e perdendo casas e haveres no incendio que destruiu a poroação, foram em fundar novo estabelecimento en chin-chéo, estabelecimento que teve a sorte do primeiro. não descorçoando, em tomavamos pé em macáo, que lá está ha mais de tres seculos resistindo por todos os meios ás repetidas tentativas que contra ella se tem dirigido. d’alli, d'aquelle ilhéo arido e isolado, veiu para à europa a porcelana chineza, e mal foi conhe- cida mereceu a preferencia sobre todos os produ- ctos similhantes, predilecção que ainda hoje dura. imital-a foi desde logo a constante preoccupação de industriaes, artistas e sabios, e já vimos o que os fabricantes de faiança conseguirão n'este genero, mas só perto de duzentos annos depois é que a des- coberta de jazigos de kaolin, materia prima indis- pensavel, veiu habilitar a europa a iniciar um fa- brico, que se por alguns lados é superior ao da china, por outros nunca se lhe equiparou. merecem as porcelanas orientaes a procura que teem, ou, pelo contrario, são dignas do desprezo que alguns (poucos) censores mal humorados lhe tri- butam? a constancia dos amadores já de ha muito respondeu a esta pergunta. accusam a arte chineza de ser uma arte de con- venção, indigna de tal nome, alheia completamente ao estudo da natureza, para que a arte europea se dirige cada vez mais, accusam-n'a de uma rotina inveterada que lhe faz reproduzir hoje os modelos que reproduzia ha tres seculos. de certo que quem quizer achar nos artefactos chinezes os primores da arte europea facil lhe serà affirmar que está bem longe de ter conseguido resultados eguaes, mas quem de boa fé procurar n'elles o unico resultado em - qne puzeram a mira, o effeito decorativo, ha de dizer que ninguem ainda os egualou. o que ha nos mais estimados productos da industria europea capaz de alegrar e ornar uma casa como as talhas da china dos srs. condes de porto covo, que estão expostas com os n.ºs , e , ou como os tanques dos duques de palmella e do sr. visconde de daupias, que teem os n.os , e , ou ainda como os enormes pratos que os mesmos duques expozèram com os n.ºs , , e ? que brilho nos esmaltes, que vigor no colorido, que opulencia na ornamentação. são estas qualidades para desprezar só porque outras lhes faltam? os preços por que os mercados de paris e londres pagam similhantes ob- jectos são a resposta á pergunta. se taes objectos não tinham logar n'uma exposição de arte ornamen- tal, e por os ter admittido merece censura a com- missão, porque será que em todas as exposições retrospectivas, que ultimamente se teem realisado em frança, talhas eguaes, que pertenceram a uma casa fidalga de portugal e hoje são de m. andré, teem sempre figurado ? emquanto á accusação de faltar o realismo aos artefactos chinezes parece-me injusta. em primeiro logar não é com os nossos olhos europeus que po- demos decretar que as figuras que a nós nos pare- cem convencionaes, que as paizagens que se nos figuram de phantasia, não são, pelo contrario, ver- dadeiros retratos, verdadeiras vistas, quando vemos que elles sabem reproduzir flores (essas conhece- mol-as nós) que parecem colhidas de fresco nos nos- sos jardins, quando, sobretudo, em alguns objectos excepcionaes a imitação da natureza é servil, e vê-se que foi procurada. hesitaria por acaso o esculptor mène em pôr a sua assignatura nos grous ou nas umas certas regras empiricas, transmittidas de paes para filhos, chamavamos japão a um certo numero de typos determinados. eu partilho da ignorancia geral e, não tendo nunca pensado em estudar o as- sumpto, quando comecei o catalogo tudo me servia de embaraço. lancei mão do livro de jacquemart e sem hesitar adoptei a sua classificação e terminologia visto que entre nós a não havia. a classificação do illustrado tratadista está longe de satisfazer a ignorantes, como eu, que querem sempre tocar com o dedo para se convencerem, as bases em que se funda nem sempre são verdadeiras, os caracteristicos ado- ptados nem sempre pertencem exclusivamente ao genero a que elle os attribue. por exemplo: a fa- milia chrysanthemo peoniana é determinada sobre tudo por predominar na sua ornamentação a peonia e a chrysanthema, ora ha porcelana, que por forma alguma se pode classificar n’este genero mas em que estas flores constituem às vezes o unico orna- mento. como ha de o inexperiente evitar erros gros- seiros ? mais: ao ler o que elle escreve sobre a porcelana japoneza a impressão que fica no espirito é que tudo ou quasi tudo o que nós até hoje considerava- mos da china, as jarras pintadas com personagens, a louça chamada da india, de flores varias, as imi. tações de porcelanas européas, etc., tudo é japonez. contra similhante asserção protestam os factos e protestam os proprios livros chinezes. para a acre- ditar seria necessario admittir que tendo os portu- guezes relações seguidas e directas com a china por via de macáo, tendo à sua disposição para lhes acceitarem as encommendas as numerosas fabricas da provincia de cantão, não tendo, pelo contrario, i com o japão senão relações eventuaes em que pre- dominava o interesse religioso, relações que os abusos da companhia de jesus fizeram em breve cessar, preferiram desprezar a porcelana chineza para ir fornecer-se ao japão. É inadmissivel. de mais na época em que veio para portugal a maior parte da porcelana que hoje cá existe, e de que tanta pertence aos typos por elle classificados como do japão, já de ha muito o nosso commercio com aquelle imperio tinha cessado completamente, e de macáo provinha toda a porcelana importada. da his- toria da porcelana chineza de tching-thing-kouer, traduzida por stanislas julien, se vê que as imita- ções de porcelanas europeas e, o que é mais, a re- producção na porcelana de desenhos europeus de longe datam, e até parece um ponto assente que os cobres esmaltados foram na china inspiradus por esmaltes francezes. o erro de jacquemart provém de certo de ter elle visto unicamente uma das faces da medalha; tinha debaixo das vistas o grande numero de por- celana importada pelos hollandezes, sabia que estes, ao contrario dos portuguezes, no japão tinham tido as principaes feitorias, e tinham sabido, abstendo-se de propaganda, conservar por muito tempo as boas graças dos poderosos da terra, concluiu que ao japão pertencia aquelle genero de fabricação; se em vez d'isto tivesse escripto em portugal cahia de certo no erro contrario. a verdade é que se torna summamente difficil descriminar os productos japonezes dos chinezes e vice-versa, exceptuando alguns typos bem conheci- dos que pela côr e pelas formas se não podem con- fundir. quando eu era ainda mais ignorante do que sou hoje decidia de cadeira o que era do japão e o que era da china; comecei a abrir os olhos e logo a perplexidade do meu espirito foi grande; não me atrevia a classificar o mais insignificante objecto. o general japonez, que ha pouco visitou lisboa, foi quem veiu socegar os meus escrupulos. soube pelo interprete que s. ex. era grande ama- dor e entendedor; não me fiando só na informação, mostrei-lhe varios objectos que eu sabia bem o que eram, e em todos achei a sua opinião conforme com a dos que eu considero verdadeiros entendedores e com a dos livros; contei-lhe então as minhas du- vidas : « não me admira, me respondeu elle, os maiores entendedores do japão não podem affirmar que um objecto é japonez ou chinez por maiores que sejam as probabilidades, porque os chinezes imitáram as porcelanas japonezas e os japonezes as d'elles, e as imitações são perfeitas.» desde esse momento soceguei, porque tinha encontrado uma regra para me guiar; é a seguinte: - em portugal toda a loiça é chineza emquanto não estiver pro- vado até á evidencia que é do japão. os hollande- zes que sigam a inversa, e é provavel que ninguem se engane. apezar d'isto são tão fortes os preconceitos adqui- ridos na infancia, tem para nós tanta força uma ra- zão que o não é, o: sempre ouvi, tão portuguez, que apezar de prevenido estou desconfiado de que fiz no catalogo confusões deploraveis. de algumas já te- nho a certeza. por exemplo: classifiquei como do japão os barros descriptos com os n.° , e ; classifiquei-os assim apezar dos carimbos chi- nezes que lhe via no fundo, porque desde creança ouvira sempre que barros d'aquelle genero eram ja- ponezes; descrevi-os n'essa fé e mandei o catalogo para a imprensa. , d'aque já menelém dos pratos do sr. d. fernando de sousa, que tem o n.° . de porcelana azul antiquissima, com seus, per- sonagens tão differentes dos que os chinezes hoje piotam, é a cabaça do sr. sampaio, que tem o n.º e a data de a . da familia verde além dos pratos dos duques de palmella que já mencionei e que tem os n.os e , é um bom specimen o par de vasos do sr. sampaio, que tem o n.º . de mandarins a jarra do sr. visconde de dau- pias n.° , e a que tem o n.° , do sr. eduardo van zeller, d'um typo differente e que mal se pode classificar n’esta familia; ainda as jarras do sr. an- tonio maria fidé que tem o n.° , e sobretudo as chavenas do sr. francisco ribeiro da cunha que tem o n.° e que recommendo aos amadores como joias preciosas, pois a delicadeza com que es- tão pintadas não se excede. da familia chamada rosa a talha dos duques de palmella n.° e o prato do sr. macedo braga que tem o n.° . dos differentes typos de porcelana chamado da india tão variados, além das talhas dos condes de porto covo, que já mencionei, dos tanques dos du- ques de palmella e das talhas dos mesmos senhores que tem o n.° , é um verdadeiro objecto de mu- seu a talha do sr. visconde de daupias que tem o n.° . ainda difficil de classificar, talvez chrysanthemo peoniana, a jarra do sr. eduardo van zeller que tem o n.° e que é digna de menção. como producto de influencia da arte europea na industria chineza nada na sala e se pode comparar ás terrinas da sr.a condessa de ficalho, descriptas com o n.° ; a elegancia de fórmas que os ou- rives francezes sabiam dar aos seus trabalhos, junta ao esplendor e brilho incomparavel dos esmaltes chinezes. páro aqui; proseguir seria repetir o catalogo; pois o que procurei na escolha dos objectos foi que na collecção se encontrassem todos os typos das porcelanas chinezas, evitando as repetições; julgo tel-o conseguido. do japão só mencionarei quatro objectos. as ta- lhas dos duques de palmella, que teem o n.° , pois não tenho noticia da existencia de outras, e não são menos bellas do que raras; as que teem o n.° , de forma pouco vulgar e antiguidade incon- testavel; as jarras do sr. osborne sampaio, speci- mens raros, eguaes a uma pertencente ao barão gus- tavo rotschild, que mereceu ser reproduzida por jacquemart na sua historia da ceramica; finalmente o milhafre do sr. d. duarte manuel, exposto com o n.° , e que bem prova que os artistas japonezes quando querem sabem tão bem como outros quaes- quer copiar a natureza. alongado de mais vae este trabalho, e para ser completo ainda me falta lançar uma rapida vista de olhos pelos numerosos specimens de porcelanas eu- ropeas. abbreviarei o mais que poder. no seculo passado portugal, apezar do amor que tinha ás suas porcelanas orientaes, não pôde esca- par ao gosto que em toda a europa se desenvolveu pelas graciosas porcelanas de fabricação recente. para cá vieram numerosos productos de vincennes e sèvres, e da pleiade de fabricas que em frança se fundáram em torno d'esta, e sobretudo de saxe e dos mais pontos da allemanha. os serviços de meissen ou de sèvres, os surtouts de figurinhas, de biscuit faziam no seculo xyili parte obrigada da mo- deros de fabre sobres servichas de bilia das casas fidalgas, e por isso tinham direito a um logar nas salas da exposição; dava-lh’o tambem o seu valor artistico, só contestado pelos mais ob- cecados. confesso que me encantam muito mais a graça e delicadeza com que os artistas de meissen modela- ram as suas figurinhas, a riqueza das cores com que sonhavam decoral-as, qualidades que as tornam o mais elegante ornato de um toucador ou de uma sala de senhora, unica ambição que teem, do que a ingenuidade dos toscos oleiros que no seculo xv ou xvi pintavam burros que não são burros mas que o queriam ser porque teem orelhas de burro; para admirar artistas tanto ou mais ingenuos escuso de remontar a épocas tão remotas, tenho-os ahi a cada passo illustrando os muros da cidade e assi- gnando com — cecilio — as suas obras, ou vou aprecial-os á feira de belem nos bonecos em que os olhos são pontos e os narizes são traços. procurei que na sala e todos os paizes, todas as fabricas estivessem representadas, e d'algumas con- segui obter specimens verdadeiramente notaveis. rapidamente mencionarei o que de todas me parece melhor. de vincennes, origem da fabrica de sèvres, o estabelecimento ceramico mais notavel do mundo, os, dois potes de pasta molle que o sr. osborne sampaio expoz com o n.° . de sèvres os cheiradores (pots-pourris) do mesmo senhor que tem o n.° , notaveis pela cor e oiro, e ainda os n.ºs e da mesma collecção. gra- ciosas quanto possivel as estatuetas do sr. francisco ribeiro da cunha que tem o n.º . de niederviller, da época em que o conde de custine adquiriu a fabrica, o grupo de biscuit re- de vienna d'austria a collecção de chavenas dos mesmos duques que tem os n.os a . das fabricas inglezas o prato de wedgwood que tem o n.° é o mais notavel specimen que tenho visto d’um genero que nunca ninguem excedeu. a collecção de biscuits do sr. antonio maria fidié des- cripta com os n.° a , e que julguei poder classificar como de origem ingleza, attendendo ao typo dos personagens, é no seu genero das mais notaveis. de capo di monti são dignos de nota a preciosa tigella branca do sr. antonio maria fidié (n.° ) e sobre tudo o grupo do sr. ribeiro da cunha (n.° ). finalmente da fabrica hespanhola do buen retiro egualam as mais apreciadas figurinhas de saxe os n.os a e são d’uma graça e elegancia inex- cedivel as figuras do grupo exposto pela sr. con- dessa de ficalho com o n.° . cumpri as ordens de v. ahi estão consignadas as minhas impressões pessoaes sobre a collecção da sala e. nada valem porque me falta sciencia e auctoridade. resta-me a consolação de poder di- zer que a publicação d'ellas não é devida a pre- sumpção minha, mas á bondade de v. que me quer collocar em logar que não mereço, xi a sala e (continuação) cinco vitrines da sala e contêm a maior parte dos codices que concorreram á exposição, tanto de hespanha como de portugal. a superioridade da collecção hespanhola está no valor archeologico de alguns exemplares; a da col- lecção portugueza na perfeição artistica de muitos. com effeito, em quanto o mais antigo dos nossos codices não passa além dos fins do seculo xii, um dos hespanhoes é ainda anterior ao seculo x, outros d'este seculo e do immediato. o que se reputa anterior ao seculo x é um cu- riosissimo breviario mosarabe ( ). o uso do offi- cio gothico ou mosarabe, cujá instituição se attribue a santo isidoro, arcebispo de sevilha, durou 'em hespanha até ao tempo de affonso vi. o rito mosa- rabe era muito mais simples que o gregoriano, não continha as ceremonias que de seculo a seculo se foram introduzindo nos officios divinos, e que este ultimo rito auctorisava e regulava. a missa mosarabe, similhante pois à dos primitivos chris- tãos, conservou-se, durante seculos, sem os succes- sivos accrescentamentos que pouco a pouco se in- troduziram no ritual romano. o breviario exposto, monumento interessante para a historia ecclesiastica da peninsula, contem psal. mos, hymnos e canticos. a traducção dos psalmos, attribuida a santo isidoro, differe das versões co- nhecidas. a letra wisigothica mosarabe tem um ca- racter particular. a alteração do romano é muito maior que n'outros codices contemporaneos; pre- dominam as formas curvas, o que tudo faz mais difficil aqui a leitura que n'outros manuscriptos da mesma epoca. as letras que se lêem melhor são as versaes das epigraphes, porque não são tão profun- damente alteradas como o cursivo. as letras capitaes, coloridas, de caracter disforme e phantastico, representam ás vezes cabeças huma- nas, aves ou peixes; outras vezes ornatos com fór. mas menos definidas. muitas d’estas illuminuras fa- zem lembrar os ensaios de pintura das creanças. os psalmos ou hymnos começam por neumas de musica. este codice, em pergaminho in-fol. está muito deteriorado pelo grande uso que teve. eis aqui outro monumento da antiga paleographia hespanhola. É a obra de s. gregorio magno, mo- ralia in job, em pergaminho, in-fol. maximo. cal. ligraphicamente considerado, este codice já não differe, tanto como o anterior, dos outros contem- poraneos. a letra, com ser wisigothica, é muito mais regular, e por tanto muito mais legivel; as versaes das epigraphes mais correctas e perfeitas. a seguinte nota, lançada n'uma das ultimas fo- lhas dá a epoca e o nome do auctor d'esta copia: explicit liber moralium gregori romensis pape. era dcccclxiii in idus aprilis. vita pasce hora prima deo gratias. regnanti rege raneniro et comite fre- denando, nec non et basilio episcopo. uma nota fi- nal declara o nome do scriba florencio. no archivo da egreja de santo isidoro de leão, conserva-se uma biblia da mesma epoca, muito si- milhante na letra e na ornamentação, porém de outro copista, como se lè n'uma de suas paginas : conscriptus est hic codex à notario sanctione pres- bytero xiii kal. julias. era dcccclxviii obtinente glo. rioso ac serenissimo regni consulque ejus fredinando gundisalvis egregium comes in castella comitatum gerenti. uma pagina d'este codice de santo isidoro de leão é illuminada. consiste a ornamentação n'um grande arco, e n'elle outros quatro inclusos, todos de volta de ferradura, fustes e capiteis das colum- nas tambem arabes, e os quatro evangelistas com as formas dos animaes emblematicos.' ha em hespanha, na bibliotheca do escurial ou- tro codice, tambem do seculo x, porém mais orna- mentado e em maior perfeição. representa uma das suas estampas nove figuras em tres series: as tres primeiras são de chindasvinto, kecesvinto e egica; as tres segundas de urraca, sancho e ra- miro; as tres ultimas, finalmente, de sarracenus socius, vigila scriba e garsea discipulus. taes fo- ram os tres que illuminaram e copiaram o codice aheldense, e que, do alto da realeza da arte, não hesitaram em emparelhar-se na mesma estampa com os proprios monarchas. ? o seculo xi está representado na collecção pelo liber evangeliorum ( ), ms. em pergaminho, in- fol. menor, com illuminuras douradas e coloridas. : museu español de antiguedades, tom. , pag. . idem, tom. iii, pag. . na maior parte d'estas illuminuras predomina a côr verde. as figuras, muitas das quaes são coroadas ou mitradas, estão assentadas em cadeiras gothi- cas de varias formas. o desenho é muito incorre- cto. a biblia, que fazia parte da livraria da egreja d'avila ( ), com ser já do seculo xii, assemelha-se ainda muito, na letra, na ornamentação e até nas dimensões aos codices do seculo x. a illuminura da primeira folha representa a arca de noé com um desenho incorrectissimo. em cada face da arca ha tres series de janellas, que não deixam quasi es- paços entre si, occupadas por figuras humanas ou de animaes. por baixo da arca um medalhão repre- senta noé e seus tres filhos; ao lado o mesmo pa- triarcha sacrificando n'um altar. as tarjas coloridas são ornadas ao modo arabe, estylo predominante nas illuminuras de todos os codices citados dos se- culos x, xi e xii. bem como no codice de santo isidoro de leão, os evangelistas foram representados na biblia de avila a fol. com as formas dos animaes emble- maticos. as illuminuras d'este codice conservam as côres tão vivas que parece terem sido ha poucos dias applicadas sobre o pergaminho. o ordenamiento de alcalá, collecção de leis pro- mulgadas em alcalá de henares por d. affonso ix, tem a primeira folha illuminada com o sello d'el-rei d. pedro. É este um d'aquelles bellos sellos roda- dos, em cuja execução tanto se esmeravam alguns dos illuminadores de castella, e que se encontram em muitos codices e documentos antigos d'este paiz. no centro estão pintadas as armas reaes; à roda em bellos caracteres gothicos floridos : segno del- rey don pedro. mais fóra em gothico redondo, mas liso; + don nuno senhor de viscaya alferez mayor del-rey confirma. don fernando de castro mayordomo mayor del-rey confirma. o codice con- clue com a seguinte nota em caracteres similhantes aos ultimos : yo nicolas goncalez escrivano del- rey lo escrivi y illumine. - este codice fazia parte da bibliotheca particular do prelado d. pedro te- norio, por elle doada á egreja de toledo pelos an- nos de . parece d'este mesmo seculo a biblia casielnana, exposta com os livros portuguezes, por pertencer å bibliotheca publica de evora ( ). a letra é mais imperfeita que a do ordenamiento d’alcalá; as il- luminuras que representam figuras humanas deno- tam egualmente um atrazo maior da arte ou antes do artista. os desenhos lineares de estylo arabe das letras capitaes é que mais se assemelham aos d'aquelle codice. muitas das illuminuras não chega- ram a ser feitas ou concluidas. para umas ficaram os espaços em branco por varios logares; para ou- tras o illuminador fez apenas os esboços. os dese- nhos são tão incorrectos e tão grosso o colorido que, se não fora a forma de letra, facilmente se attribuiria este codice ao seculo xii ou xiii. É o segundo tomo de la grande y general histo- ria do rei de castella d. affonso, o sabio. joaquim heliodoro da cunha rivára, sendo bibliothecario da bibliotheca publica de evora, deu-se ao trabalho de cotejar minuciosamente este codice com as descri- pções que os bibliographos hespanhoes fazem do tomo segundo da general historia, e achou muitas e notaveis variantes que fazem do codice eborense este codice deve ter sido escripto e illuminado de a . póde ver-se outro similbante de no mus. es. pan. de antiguedades, tom. v, pag. . os generia fazem imento de monjina immedia: serve à larga tarja de ramagens, aves e outros ornatos, illuminados a cores e ouro, serve de moldura ao quadro. na pagina immediata, no meio de um fra- gmento de moldura similhante, está pintado o escudo da casa estuñiga. o missal antigo de toledo ( ) é ainda em le- tra gothica; as tarjas e letras capitaes decoradas no estylo arabe, e a capa ornada n’este mesmo estylo. as illuminuras, que representam o presepio e a céa, são de estylo hespanhol com reminiscencias arabes e flamengas. não é menos curiosa que as illuminu- ras a encadernação mosarabe toledana, da mesma época. diz-se que pelo cardeal lorenzana fôra adqui- rido este missal em roma, em , e depois doado å egreja de toledo. todavia ninguem pode duvidar de que foi escripto, illuminado e encadernado em hespanha. de outro missal de toledo, denominado o missal rico, veiu á exposição o volume .° É tambem de letra gothica, porém nas grandes tarjas e nas letras capitaes illuminadas apparecem já claras influencias da renascença. algumas das tarjas são ornadas de bustos, um dos quaes é o do papa leão .. n'este volume, e diz-se que tambem no setimo, vêem-se em todas as portadas e n'algumas das tar- jas as armas dos cisneros. começou a escrever o missal rico de toledo gon- çalo de cordova em . illuminaram-no o clerigo affonso ximenes, bernardino carderroa e fr. filippe, segundo consta dos livros da contadoria que se con- servam na obra e fabrica da egreja de toledo. n'algumas das tarjas do sexto volume lêem-se as datas de e . foi dedicada esta obra ao cardeal ximenes de cisneros, arcebispo de toledo. figuram na secção hespaphola dois livros de ho. jas começourdova epernarding a contadoria de ras, ambos do seculo xvi. o mais antigo e de mais preço contém vinte e tres illuminuras de pagina inteira, letras capitaes e tarjas a cores e ouro. al- gumas das letras capitaes são ornadas com miniatu- ras delicadissimas perfeitamente coloridas. as mi- niaturas e as tarjas e letras illuminadas são do mesmo estylo que as de alguns livros congeneres da collecção portugueza ( , e ). o catalogo manuscripto dos codices da secção hespanhola diz ter pertencido «à illustre senhora d. leonor de la vegan e que fora dado em roma ao embaixador garcia laso, enviado de bruxellas como capellão da archiduqueza joanna d'austria. a deputação provincial de barcelona enviou á ex- posição uma collecção interessantissima de sete co- dices com os desenhos originaes das joias e obras de ourivesaria fabricadas pelos artistas da catalu- nha no periodo de tres seculos e meio. com os exemplares da bibliotheca nacional de madrid está exposto um d'estes codices. a maior parte dos de- senhos teem os nomes dos ourives, e alguns as na- turalidades. seria extremamente interessante a his- toria authentica e illustrada da ourivesaria catalã, extraida d'esta collecção de documentos. não me consta que em nenhuma outra cidade da peninsula se conserve outra similhante collecção. esta mina foi explorada pelo sr. barão ch. davil- lier para as suas recherches sur l'orfèvrerie en es- pagne, livro em que se encontram não somente a noticia dos codices de barcelona, mas tambem mui- tos nomes de ourives e fac-similes dos seus dese- nhos. o outro livro de horas ( ) não pertence á bi- bliotheca nacional, mas ao sr. d. marcial lorves de aragon, de sadava, saragoça. a maior parte da época. os trajos reduzem-se a compridas vestes cingidas ao corpo. um leito curioso, não obstante faltar-lhe toda a perspectiva, uma scena campestre representando a vindima, a ceifa e um lagar; eis o que se pode colher das sessenta e tantas illuminuras do codice. ainda assim, em attenção aos poucos monumentos que restam de tão remota época, a observação de a. herculano é inteiramente exacta. o codice * da sala a é um novo testamento em pergaminho in fol., escripto no seculo xil ou xiii, e de pequeno interesse artistico, pelo que respeita ás illuminuras. todo o seu merito, que é grande, está na encadernação de prata com douraduras, feita no seculo siv. uma das faces é adornada com a imagem de christo crucificado entre as de nossa senhora e de s. joão. na parte superior dois anjos incensam com thuribulos. a inscripção seguinte, em allemão mi- nusculo do seculo xiv, cobre a moldura: yhvs avtem trasiens per medeo ylorom ibat ave maria gratia plena dominus tecon. na outra face vê-se tambem a imagem de christo, porém aqui sentado n'uma cadeira com a forma de dois leões, abençoando com a mão direita e segu- rando um livro na esquerda. uma cercadura de ra- magens adorna a moldura d'esta face. quatro broxas ou cabuchões, pregados nos quatro angulos de cada face, defendem dos choques e attritos as partes re- levadas. pertence este codice á sé de vizeu. merece particular attenção uma biblia hebraica exposta pela bibliotheca nacional de lisboa. e das collecções hespanhola e portugueza o unico exem- plar illuminado no estylo arabe, propriamente dito, isto é, no seu estado de pureza e de maior perfeição. em muitas folhas, no principio e no fim do livro, o texto, distribuido por uma, duas, ou quatro co- lumnas é contido em portadas coloridas de formas e côres variadissimas. alguns dos arcos tem a forma da ogiva pouco elegante, anterior a , outros são de volta re- donda, outros de volta de ferradura, outros quin- quilobados, outros finalmente á maneira de mitra. algumas vezes a forma de portico é substituida pela de moldura, exteriormente quadrangular, e in- teriormente curvilinea, sendo a curva formada por seis segmentos de circulo. as cores, a ornamenta- ção dos arcos e columnas, sobre tudo os ornatos geometricos, perfeitamente arabes, dão a este exem- plar um interesse grande, pela raridade dos livros assim illuminados. collado a uma folha está um pa- pel com a traducção ein latim do texto em frente, da qual consta que um certo samuel escrevera os vinte e quatro livros do codice nos annos de e . são numerosos os codices do seculo xv attribui- veis pela maior parte ás industrias francezas e ita- lianas. eis aqui na sala a um dos mais notaveis. É a historia das antiguidades judaicas de flavio josepho, escripta em francez em pergaminho in-fol. (* ). comprehende vinte e sete livros, sendo a columna em que cada um começa, guarnecida por uma grande e bella tarja a côres e ouro, represen- tando ramagens, flores, aves, etc. por cima da epi- graphe de cada capitulo uma estampa representa algum dos seus assumptos, geralmente uma batalha. muitas letras capitaes e iniciaes são tambem illumi- nadas. todas as grandes illuminuras que precedem os capitulos são muito finas e muito bem coloridas. a architectura das cidades, edificios e fortalezas do es- tylo ogival : os costumes da mesma época. a illu- minura do cap. xxvi representa a cidade de jeru- salem cercada pelos soldados de tito, vestidos e armados como os do seculo xv. um d'elles dispára contra a cidade uma bombarda cercada de anneis de ferro, como eram as primeiras que se empregá- ram, nos seculos xiv e xv, nos campos de batalha. pertence actualmente este bello codice ao sr. mar- quez de ficalho. não ha n'elle, porém, nenhuma carta ou signal que nos indique o nome do auctor e a sua procedencia. codice da sala g, exposto por sua mages- tade el-rei o senhor d. luiz, é da mesma época, escripto egualmente em francez, e ornado com uma portada do mesmo estylo. É um tratado de hygiene e de medicina de allebrand, escripto em pergami- nho, in-fol. pequeno. na ultima folha foi lançada a nota seguinte em letra da mesma época, porém, se- gundo parece, de mão differente : cest la liure que fu fait et compile par maistre allebrand de flo- rence a la requeste de la comtesse de provence qui estoit mere de la royne de ffrance de la royne dalmayn de la royne dangleterre de la contesse danjou et fust compile en lÃn mil ccclbj. esta data deve referir-se ao livro original e não á copia, feita de certo alguns cem annos depois. a portada do livro contém uma illuminura re- presentando a creação do mundo; em baixo, no meio da tarja, um escudo esquartellado. o desenho e colorido d’esta estampa são no mesmo estylo que os do codice de que anteriormente fallei. porém n'esta copia de allebrand o que ha sobretudo e excepcionalmente notavel são as innumeraveis il- luminuras, feitas a côres e oiro, das letras ca- pitaes. cada uma, de grandes dimensões, repre- senta o assumpto do capitulo a que dá principio. o cap. i trata do ar. começa, pois, por uma le- tra illuminada representando este elemento; isto é, uma planicie, e por cima o céo azulado, onde se movem algumas aves e nuvens; exactamente como nos nossos modernos livros de meteorologia, onde se representam os meteoros atmosphericos. as cÔ- res são vivas e os desenhos finissimos. o segundo trata du mengier (du manger). a letra capital representa um homeni sentado a uma mesa, comendo. a do terceiro, que trata das bebidas, re- presenta uma mulher dando de beber a um homem; a do quarto um lagar de vinho; a do quinto uma mulher recostada, dormindo; a do sexto um banho; o setimo, que fem por epigraphe de aller á femme, um homem abraçando uma mulher, junto de um leito. as outras representam a sangria, a applica- ção de ventosas, a applicação de sanguesugas, o ef- feito de um emetico, o medico aconselhando o modo de preservar da peste; o sol e o zodiaco, a propo- sito da insolação; uma cidade, a proposito da esco- lha de logar para habitação; um navio e um vian- dante, a proposito das jornadas por mar e por terra; homem cortando uma peça de panno, a proposito da hygiene das edades; duas figuras com grandes barretes, a proposito da hygiene do cabello; um me- dico dando instrucções a outra pessoa sobre a hy- giene dos olhos. seguem-se mais umas cento e trinta illuminuras do mesmo genero, representando assum- ptos da vida domestica, da vida rural, animaes, plan- tas, etc. para o seculo xv era uma obra illustrada immensamente superior aquellas que a gravura em madeira e a chromolithographia modernamente en- riquecem com as suas maravilhas. a maior parte das illuminuras são do mesmo pincel; algumas, pou- cas, muito mais imperfeitas denunciam mão menos habil. pertenceu este codice å bibliotheca da con- gregação do oratorio de casa de nossa senhora das necessidades. o livro de horas d'el-rei d. duarte, com estam- pas, grandes tarjas, letras capitaes e versaes a cô- res e oiro, é profusamente illuminado no estylo dos codices d'esta mesma época. as illuminuras, porem, não são tão finas e perfeitas. na pagina em que principia o officio da virgem foi lançada a seguinte nota de letra gothica : illus- trissimi principis eduardi johanis portugalie et algarbis regis serenissimi cepteque domini filii primogeniti. a letra capital d'esta mesma pagina contém o escudo das armas reaes portuguezas, com o banco de pinchar pintado de cor branca e as flo- res de liz. no fim foram accrescentadas algumas ora- ções tambem de letra gothica, mas differentes, or- nadas com illuminuras de outro pincel. a primeira estampa representa santa catharina com a corôa real, e com a palma e a roda do martyrio. tem illuminuras e letras do mesmo genero as horas do seminario episcopal de faro ( ). na capa conserva-se a seguinte nota de letra cursiva moderna de impressão: do bispo inquisidor geral d. josé maria de mello. da bibliotheca do mosteiro de mafra veiu uma collecção de nove livros de horas, psalmos, officios e outras orações, uns in- .', outros in- .° pequeno, todos em pergaminho, e na sua maior parte de le- tra similhante à dos codices anteriores, e com illu. minuras do mesmo genero, em geral mais imper- feitas. somente dois foram expostos ( e ). n’um d'elles, no verso da primeira folha, lê-se : suas differentes gradações. a ornamentação é de- licadissima, as figuras em posições phantasticas ou exaggeradas são sempre muito graciosas e elegan- tes. muitas lutam entre si ou com animaes, n'aquelle genero tão querido dos artistas da renascença. o que mais admiração causa n’esta obra notavel é a sobriedade das cores e a profusão e variedade das miniaturas, algumas das quaes para se verem nitidamente exigem o auxilio da lente. foi provavel- mente pintado por antonio de hollanda, pois d'elle escreveu seu filho, francisco de hollanda, que fora quem primeiro fizera conhecida en portugal uma maneira suave de pintar em negro e branco, supe- rior a todos os processos conhecidos nos outros pai- zes do mundo. encontram-se n'um codice da bibliotheca nacio- nal de lisboa, que contém parte das chronicas de eusebio, escriptas em lingua hespanhola, tarjas illu- minadas no mesmo estylo; fundo branco, ramagens de côr negra, nas varias gradações d'esta côr, e de oiro. este codice é do seculo xv, mas os ornatos são menos delicados, e as figuras de anjos n'um estylo que no seculo xvi, em geral, caira já em desuso. as tarjas representando flores e borboletas, em fundos doirados ou coloridos, caracterisam outro grupo de livros de horas, em que se encontram conjuntamente outros signaes que denunciam já me- lhor o seculo xvi. eis aqui entre os representantes d'este grupo um livrinho de horas da bibliotheca de evora ( ), notavel por outras particularidades que não se encontram n'outros exemplares. cada pagina do calendario está marcada com o signo respectivo na forma de uma pequena moeda doirada. estas miniaturas, bem como as das letras capitaes, são delicadissimas. n’estas ultimas o pintor tambem não · empregou mais que as cores branca e negra nas suas varias gradações. as tarjas ora são de flores, fructos e borboletas coloridas sobre fundos doira- dos, ora, mais raras vezes, representando aquelles objectos doirados sobre fundos coloridos. no officio dos mortos os fundos das tarjas são negros, e cra- neos e ossos accrescem aos outros ornatos. duas notas da mesma letra em que foram escriptas as orações latinas, explicam em lingua franceza a ori- gem miraculosa de duas d'aquellas orações. as horas da bibliotheca nacional ( ) tem a maior similhança com as antecedentes nas estampas, tarjas, letras capitaes e versaes illuminadas. parecem por- tanto attribuiveis tambem á industria franceza. as horas do sr. conde de mesquitella ( ) tem algumas tarjas no genero d'aquellas que adornam os dois codices antecedentes. são porém muito mais ricas pelo numero, variedade e belleza das illumi- nuras. · muitas estampas preenchem as paginas inteiras no reverso em frente do texto ficando o anverso em branco. a primeira representa n'uma portada do estylo da renascença com ornatos ogivaes o brazão dos costas. depois segue-se o calendario. cada mez tem uma estampa de pagina inteira representando um assumpto analogo. a do mez de janeiro repre- senta uma familia, parte da qual se aquece em frente de um fogão e outra parte prepara a cea sobre uma mesa. são lindissimos os effeitos da luz e o colorido d'este quadro todo flamengo. em frente a tarja do calendario, de aguada de ouro, represen- ta ornatos architectonicos do estylo ogival, e da parte inferior contém tres miniaturas, representando o signo e assumptos respectivos ao mez. o calen- dario dos outros mezes é ornado com illuminuras similhantes. os assumptos das estampas de pagina inteira são tirados da vida rural; a ultima, de des zembro, representa a matança de um porco. são todos curiosissimos. seguem-se os officios com muitas estampas de pagina inteira analogas ao assumpto de cada um d'elles. a primeira, que representa a prisão de christo á luz de um grande facho, faz lembrar pelos magnificos effeitos de luz alguns dos quadros de rembrandt. outras paginas são adornadas com tarjas e miniaturas perfeitissimas a aguada de ouro. em quatro estampas encontra-se em letra gothica a legenda : ave maria grative plena dominus tecum. mas esta ultima palavra apparece sempre com a fórma tecom, bem como na encadernação do codice da sé de vizeu e n'outras obras francezas e fla- mengas. as casas e fortalezas das paizagens são do estylo flamengo. as pequenas horas do sr. d. duarte manuel de noronha ( ) são illuminadas no mesmo estylo, po- rém com maior predominio dos ornatos da renas. cença, misturados ainda com outros ogivaes. sua magestade el-rei o sr. d. fernando possue umas horas illuminadas no estylo das que expoz o sr. conde de mesquitella e attribuiveis á mesma época. mas parece obra feita em portugal, pois uma das estampas representa o enterro d'el-rei d. manuel. ao passo que n'estes codices illuminados na frança e nas flandres, ou por artistas francezes e flamengos, o estylo gothico se conserva ainda nos principios do seculo xvi, nas obras illuminadas na italia, ainda no seculo xv, esse estylo desapparece inteiramente, substituido pelo da renascença. a col- lecção portugueza contém dois exemplares magni- ficos da arte italiana, ambos pertencentes ao archivo da torre do tombo. É o primeiro uma copia das obras de pedro lom- bardo, arcebispo de paris, denominado magister sententiarum, feita por um certo jacob carmelita, por incumbencia d'el-rei d. joão ii, como se de- prehende da subscripção: finit liber sententiarum feliciter. anno incarnationis dominice millesimo qua. dringētesimo nonagesimo quarto: idus decembris. et reliqua sua tota vita se tibi portugallo regi jacobus uere carmelita scriptor hujus comictit regi et tua taniù stipe peroptat. todo o verso da primeira folha, depois do prologo, é preenchido com uma bella portada a cores e ouro com medalhões representando os evangelistas e ou- tros santos. no quadro interior da tarja um portico de ordem corinthia, sustido por figuras de vulto in- teiro, com o indice dos livros contidos no volume. em baixo as armas reaes de portugal, encimadas pela cruz de christo. na pagina seguinte começa o primeiro livro, a cujas linhas de letras douradas serve de moldura uma grande tarja similhantemente illuminada. na parte superior está representada a trindade, e na inferior repete-se o escudo real. as primeiras paginas dos outros tres livros são illu- minadas no mesmo estylo, e n'ellas se repetem, tanto as armas reaes de portugal, como a cruz de christo. da biblia dos jeronymos, em sete volumes, está esposto o segundo. a subscripção prova-nos que este volume foi escripto em por alexandre verzano. tão pequenas são as differenças entre as pertence tambem á sr.a marqueza de fronteira um broche de brilhantes, rubis e esmeraldas ( ), imitando um portico de éstylo ogival. era da infanta a sr.a d. isabel maria que o deu em presente de nupcias á sr. condessa da torre, hoje marqueza de fronteira. a medalha de ouro ( ) mandou-a cunhar a aca- demia real das sciencias de lisboa para galardoar o serviço prestado por d. maria wanzeller no porto, inoculando por suas proprias mãos a vaccina, antes que os medicos o fizessem por duvidarem da sua efficacia. finalmente são dignos de attenção quatro baixo. relevos em marfim ( , , e ), pertencentes aos srs. duques de palmella. representam a ascens são, a assumpção, a epiphania e o presepio. . as salas p, q e r são forradas de pannos de arras dos seculos xvi, xyii e xviii. procedem das sés de coimbra e de lisboa, do ministerio da ma- rinha, da mitra episcopal de lamego, do palacio real de mafra, do convento de jesus á estrella, da mitra episcopal de leiria e da casa do sr. marquez da graciosa. alguns estão marcados com os nomes de dau- busson e de leynier. os de mafra são attribuidos a pedro tavares que dizem ter vindo de tavira para aquella villa. um d'elles tem a palavra tavira na parte inferior; e um tapete, as letras p tmr (pedro tavares, mafra real) . na pôpa de uma galera de um dos pannos do ministerio da marinha lê-se fortuna . o es- tylo d'esta collecção assimelha-se ao de daubus- son. · dois modelos em madeira ( e ), ambos da academia de bellas artes, ambos expostos na sala . p, representam um o edificio do erario regio, de que se não fizeram mais que os alicerces, no sitio da patriarchal queimada, o outro a capella de s. joão baptista de s. roque. pertence tambem á academia de bellas artes uma liteira com pinturas e douraduras, ornada de talha e interiormente forrada de damasco carmezim ( ). É obra do seculo passado. nas cocheiras da casa real em belem, e nas de algumas mitras e ca. sas particulares das provincias conservam-se vehi- culos d'este mesmo estylo, que provam ter sido muito usados em portugal. eram de varias especies : coches, liteiras, cadeirinhas, etc. está exposta na sala p uma obra notavel de es- ' tatuaria. É uma imagem de s. jeronymo em barro. ignora-se d'onde veiu para belem, a cuja egreja pertence. parece obra italiana, porém de época pos- terior á de lucca della robbia, a quem tem sido at- tribuida. quem conhecer as obras d'este artista de- balde procurará no s. jeronymo de belem a uncção religiosa que elle dava ás figuras dos santos. o s. jeronymo é um velho, um mendigo, que parece modelado sobre o natural. se não fosse a pedra que tem na mão em frente do peito, e o chapéo de cardeal, desprezado a um lado, ninguem se lembraria de lhe chamar s. jeronymo, ou de lhe dar qualquer outro nome de calendario romano. e toda- via n’este exagerado realismo está o grande mere- cimento da estatua. É um velho de carne e osso transformado em barro. aqui temos mais um exemplar de um genero tão numerosamente representado na exposição: uma cruz de pau santo com a imagem de christo de marfim. pertence aos srs. marquezes de mon- falim e de terena. tres estatuetas de pedra, procedentes da batalha, representam a estatuaria do seculo xv que profu- samente povoou de outras similhantes os porticos d'aquelle edificio. está exposta na sala p uma curiosa collecção de medidas de bronze dos reinados de d. manuel, d. joão e d. sebastião, pertencentes a acade- mia real das sciencias de lisboa e á camara mu- nicipal de coimbra. perlence á sr.a condessa da cunha um busto de marmore branco representando d. luiz da cunha, embaixador d'el-rei d. joão v em varias côrtes. dizem ter sido offerecido ao embaixador portuguez pela academia franceza. parece-me, porém, duvi- doso o facto, não somente por se não saber a que titulo faria a academia franceza tamanha honra a um estrangeiro, mas tambem porque o busto tem a data de j. b. xavery, , esculptor, natural de antuerpia, que trabalhou na hollanda. um baixo-relevo em marmore branco, da época romana, procede do mosteiro de chellas, onde es- tava embutido n'uma parede do claustro. e obra infinitamente inferior ao sarcophago de marmore, achado em reguengos, no alemtejo, e que hoje se conserva no museu municipal do porto. o sr. casimiro candido da cunha expõe seis baixo-relevos em marmore branco, representando a annunciação, a visitação, a epiphania, a adora- ção dos pastores, a circumcisão e a fugida para o egypto, procedentes de algum convento de lisboa ou das proximidades. todos estes baixo-relevos são da mesma época, segunda metade do seculo xv, e provavelmente do mesmo artista. o da adoração dos pastores poderá, á primeira vista, parecer mais antigo, mas, reparando com attenção, desde logo cessará toda a duvida. a extrema similhança das cabeças, e particularmente dos cabellos e barbas, n'uns e n'outros, o desenho das arvores n'este qua- dro e no da visitação estão indicando uma mesma época, um mesmo estylo, se não um mesmo ar- tista. o estylo é já influenciado pela renascença, n'uma época em que o gothico dominava ainda com absoluto imperio na arte portugueza. as legendas que illustram cada um dos quadros são dos fins do seculo xvir ou dos principios do se- culo passado, e notavelmente gongoricas. É este mesmo caracter que determina a época em que fo- ram gravadas e pintadas no marmore. entre as obras de marmore expostas na sala p, mencionarei, finalmente, um bello frontal de mo- saico com grandes ramagens. foi da egreja de s. bento. hoje pertence a academia de bellas artes. no seculo xvii esteve muito em uso ornar as egre- jas com frontaes, retabulos e outras peças n'este genero. encontram-se frequentemente nos templos de evora, por exemplo no que os jesuitas edificá- ram, e hoje faz parte da casa pia, e no espinheiro, na distancia de tres kilometros d'aquella cidade. a proximidade das pedreiras de estremoz favoreceria de certo esta industria no sul do reino. a sala p contém numerosos objectos de bronze ou de latão com ou sem doirados, procedentes, pela maior parte, de mafra. entre elles ha uma estante de côro, que alli, dizem, servia a el-rei d. joão vi nos seus exercicios de cantochão. É curiosa a col- lecção de candieiros de varias formas e dimensões, procedentes d'aquelle convento, da academia de bellas artes e de coimbra. na sala e estão expostos alguns moveis interes- santes, productos da industria nacional. o mais an- rrada de cafestas ferrheria d'este tigo é uma arca forrada de coiro com grandes fer- ragens estanhadas. o estylo d'estas ferragens é do seculo xv; porém nas obras de serralheria d'este genero, feitas em vizeu e na guarda, o estylo mui- tas vezes não corresponde á época, por ter conti- nuado em uso por muito tempo, depois de haver desapparecido em lisboa e n'outras cidades. ora o mencionado cofre procede do convento de santa clara da guarda. os outros moveis são cadeiras de sola, um con- tador de ébano do sr. joão tamagnini da motta bar- bosa, um armario do museu kensington, um orato- rio de pau santo do sr. teixeira de aragão, duas cadeiras de talha da india do sr. joão jorge cecilia koll, e um canapé e cadeiras eguaes a outras ex- postas na sala p, no estylo de luiz xv, estofadas de tapeçaria de gobelins, pertencentes á mitra de leiria. no oratorio do sr. teixeira de aragão está uma cruz de madeira com imagem de marfim e a haste e braços forrados anteriormente de prata lavrada, pertencente ao sr. augusto pinto moreira da costa. É obra indiana, similhante a outra de santos-o-ve- lho, que não foi exposta. n'este e n'outros pontos prova a exposição como, nos seculos xvii e xvili, eram importados da india numerosos artefactos, des- tinados ao culto ou ao uso domestico. são tão raras em portugal as obras de esculptura em madeira, anteriores ao seculo xvii, que, bem como já tive occasião de observar, quaesquer exem- plares d'esta classe, só por isso, e independente- mente de qualquer outra circumstancia, teem um grande interesse. vem esta reflexão a proposito das duas estatuas de madeira, pintadas e doiradas, pro- cedentes do convento de thomar, e expostas pela bibliotheca nacional de lisboa, onde se conservam outras similhantes. teem estas estatuas dois metros de altura, e por isso parecem mais disformes e mais grosseiramente esculpidas do que em verdade são. julgo que muito ganhariam em ser vistas na distan- cia para a qual, nos seculos sy ou xvi, foram com effeito destinadas. na mesma sala está exposta uma reproducção em gesso de um dos baixo-relevos do claustro de santa cruz de coimbra. brevemente se exporá outra na mesma sala. ha mais um terceiro baixo-relevo que pelo seu estado de deterioração não convém já re- produzir. estes baixo-relevos do claustro de santa cruz, outro similhante que resta no antigo claustro da sé velha, hoje incorporado no edificio da imprensa da universidade, o pulpito de santa cruz, a porta la- teral da egreja da sé velha, o retabulo da capella mór da egreja do convento de s. marcos, outros retabulos das egrejas antiga e moderna de santa clara, da egreja incompleta de s. domingos, etc., demonstram a existencia de uma escola de escul- ptura, que fundada alli no seculo xvi por algum ou alguns artistas estrangeiros, cujas producções mais notaveis são o pulpito de santa cruz e o retabulo de s. marcos, se desenvolveria depois a ponto de deixar grande numero de productos não somente em coimbra, mas tambem em diversas egrejas da beira. o grande retabulo da capella mór da sé da guarda, extremamente similhante ao da capella do sacramento da sé velha, é, como este ultimo, uma obra da escola de coimbra, porém dos fins do seculo xvii, quando se apagára já, em degeneração crescente, o explendor da escola conimbricense em tempo de d. manuel ou d. joão iii. tanto no feitio como no genero de ornamentação. teem muito mais comprimento e largura que estes ultimos, sem que tão desmesuradas proporções lhes façam perder a elegancia. a obra de talha doirada, que nos segundos constitue a sua principal decora- ção, vendo-se distribuida por toda a caixa, tejadi- tho, jogo e rodas, está accumulada nos primeiros, e com muito mais profusão no jogo principalmente, e depois nas rodas. a caixa e tejadilho são forra- dos interna e externamente de ricos estofos, com guarnição de obra de passamaneria de oiro ou pra- ta. «o coche triumphal ( ) tem o tejadilho e toda a caixa vestidos, por fora e por dentro, de velludo carmezim, recamado de ornamentos de oiro em lin- das cercaduras e outras diversidades de desenhos. a parte superior do tejadilho é ornada nos angu- los, em vez de maçanetas doiradas, com uns enfei- tes do mesmo velludo, a modo de plumagem. as cortinas que, em logar de vidros, os vedam pelos quatro lados, são egualmente de velludo carmezim, com a mesma guarnição de oiro. os assentos e al- mofadas, bem como o persevão , são forrados de velludo carmezim guarnecido de galões de oiro. sobre o jogo, ao lado da almofada do cocheiro, er- guem-se duas estatuas allegoricas doiradas. na tra- zeira vêem-se lindos grupos allegoricos de figuras de vulto inteiro, tudo de obra de talha doirada, re- presentando a lusitania entre as estatuas da fama, que a está coroando, e da abundancia, que entorna seus dons liberalmente; e por baixo um dragão e as figuras de um preto e de um musulmano, am- dá-se este nome á parte interior do coche, onde as- senta os pés quem vae dentro. como, porém, na portada e nas tarjas figuram as armas reaes de portugal com o banco de pinchar, os escudos da rainha d. leonor e a cruz de christo, e como eu atten. desse a estas circumstancias somente, pareceu-me que a d. manuel, e não a d. joão ii, se devia attribuir o ter mandado escrever e illuminar o livro em italia. com effei- to, sendo d. manuel irmão da rainha d. leonor, poderia, como ella, ter tomado o brazão de infante, de seu pae, d. fernando, duque de vizeu, filho d'el-rei d. duarte e de sua mulher a rainha d. leonor, da qual, por ser filha de d. fernando i de aragão, provinham os escudos d'este reino para as armas dos infantes, seus filhos. a rainha d. leonor, mulher d'el-rei d. joão , e seu irmão d. ma- nuel usariam pois o brazão do infante seu pae, e d. ma- nuel, como mestre da ordem de christo, podia encimal.o com a cruz d'esta ordem. a mim pois não me pareceu duvidoso que as armas, tantas vezes pintadas no livro fossem as de d. manuel, antes de subir ao throno. e, com esta idea, na errata do catalogo emendei, em vez de d. joão u, d. manuel. re- clamou o sr. basto, dizendo-me que, tendo o livro a data de , era então rei de portugal d. joão . e' justa a reclamação, e esta divergencia entre a data e o brazão e mais em particular quando encimado pela cruz de chris- to, poderia talvez explicar-se, suppondo que el-rei d. joão i mandára fazer o livro em italia para seu primo d. manuel nota a pag. a biblia dos jeronymos, em sete volumes illumipados. nos primeiros tomos d'esta obra encontra-se tambem o escudo real com o banco de pinchar, porém já sem os dois pequenos escudos de aragão. estas, bem como no codice fa . a exposicao retrospectiva de arte o fine arts library bax this book should be returned to the library on or before the last date stamped below. a fine of five cents a day is incurred by retaining it beyond the specified time. please return promptly. joh . a handbook of ornament with three hundred plates, containing about three thousand illustrations of the elements, and the application of decoration to objects by franz sales meyer professor at the school of ttpplied art karlsruhe third american edition the architectural book publishing company paul wenzel and maurice krakow thirty-one east twelfth street, new york architecture nk introduction. [the term "ornament", in its limited sense, includes sucb of the elements of decoration as are adapted, or developed, from natural foliage. these differ from the geometrical elements, inasmuch as they are organic i. e. possessing stems, leaves, flowers, &c., while the latter are inorganic. when merely drawn on paper, &c., and unapplied — a foliated element is considered in the abstract as "ornament". when applied to beautify an object — it becomes an "element of decoration". the term "decoration" signifies the art or process of applying the various elements to beautify objects. it is also used to dencti the completed result. thus the artist, who is occupied in the "deco ration" of a vase, may represent ornament upon it; and the ornamen; is then the "decoration" of the vase. the "elements" of decoration are: geometrical-lines, ornament, natural-foliage, artificial objects, animals, and the human figuro. these may be considered as the "ingredients"; and they are miici!. and applied, on various arrangements or "features", according to certain acknowledged "recipes" which are termed "principles". the "principles" of decoration are not included in this hand- book, as the limits of it allow only a brief notice of such elements as have been in general use during the successive historic-epochs.] wherever the hand of man has produced any decoration, be it ii introduction. original invontion, or only the arbitrary variation of some familiar fundamental idea, the following will invariably be the case: (a) the decoration is produced by arranging and joining dots and lines, or by combining and dividing geometrical figures, in accordance with the laws of rhythm, regularity, symmetry, &c.; (b) it arises from the attempt of the decorator to represent the objects of the external world. nearest at hand for imitation, is or- ganic nature with the plants, animals, and human form. but in- organic nature also offers models: e. g. the forms of crystallisation (snow-flakes), and the phenomena of nature (clouds, waves, &c.). rich sources are also opened-up by the artificial objects which are fashioned by man himself. it is obvious that all kinds of elements may be used in com- bination: geometrical may be united with natural forms; and so on. moreover it was easy for human imagination to combine details taken from nature into monstrous forms not found in nature, e. g. the sphinx, centaur, mermaid, &c.; and animal and human bodies with plant-like terminations. if we collect, into groups, the bases or motives of decoration omitting what is non-essential and detached, we arrive at the classi- fication given in the following pages. decoration is applied to countless objects; and the style may be very varied without being arbitrary; being determined, firstly, by the aim and the material of the object to be decorated, and, secondly, by the ideas ruling at different periods and among different nations. it is therefore obvious that it has a comprehensive and important domain. a knowledge of it is indispensable to artists; and it is an instructive and sociologically interesting factor of general culture. the peculiarities which arise from the reciprocal relation of material, form, and aim, more or less modified by the ideas of the age and the natural characteristics of the nation, are termed the "style" of that period and nation. the mention, of the century and the nation, gives a convenient method of labelling works of art, which is now well understood; e. g. — " th century, italiaji". the majority of works on ornament, arrange their material according to periods and nations'; but the present handbook, follow- ing the principles laid down by semper, bbtticher and jacobstbal, is based on a systom which is synthetic rather than analytic; and in- tended more to construct and develope from the elements than to dissect and deduce. it contains three main divisions: division i treats of the "elements of decoration", or motives of which it is formed. geometrical motives formed by the rhythmical arrangement of dots and lines, by the regular section of angles, by the formation and division of closed figures, are followed by the forms of nature which are offered for ornamental imitation by the introduction. ill vegetable and animal kingdoms, and bj the human frame. these in their turn are followed by artificial objects, or forms borrowed from art, technology, and science, and usually met-with in the class of trophies, symbols, &c. division ii, "ornament applied to features", arranges them according to their functions, and the reciprocal relation between the construction of the object and the application of the ornament the division falls into five sub-divisions: a. bands (bordering, framing and connecting forms); b. free ornaments (forms whose construction expresses a termination or cessation); c. supports (types of ornament which express the principle of weight-bearing); d. enclosed ornament suitable for the enlivenment of a defined bordered field, (panels); e. repeating ornament (the decoration of surfaces which, disregarding the limits of space, are developed, on a geometrical or organic basis, into "patterns"). division iii, shows the application of decoration to vase-form, metal objects, furniture, frames, jewelry, heraldry and writing, printing, &c. further details, as to the groups and divisions, will be found in the "table of the arrangement of the handbook" which follows this introduction. the illustrations, numbering almost , , and comprised on full-page plates, represent the styles of the most various periods and nations. a comparatively large share of attention has been devoted to the antique, because it is in that period that form usually finds its clearest and most beautiful expression. next to that in impor- tance is the renascence with its wealth and freedom of form. the space, devoted to the creations of the middle ages, is more limited. from the styles of the decadence, only a few examples have been admitted, for the sake of comparison and characterisation. modern times, as a rule, have only been taken into account, where forms arose which do not occur in the historic styles. the illustrations have been partly taken direct from the originals; and partly — as was almost unavoidable — reproduced from other books; for the leading idea of the present work is not to offer anything 'new, but to arrange what is already known, in a manner suitable both to the subject and to the aim of a handbook. where the author was acquainted with the source, which he regrets was not always the case, the authority has been mentioned in the text. each division and sub-division is prefixed by a few remarks on style and history, characteristics, motives, symbolism, aim, and appli- cation. these are followed, so far as is necessary and practicable, by notes on the places where the objects illustrated were discovered, where they are now preserved, and on their material and size. hints iv introduction. as to construction, are given oniy where the construction cannot at once be inferred from the figure. readers -who use this book for purposes of tuition, will find in the author's "ornamentale formenhhre"* the plates on a scale of /j times the size of this handbook, together with the requisite hints for the use of the work in schools. * franz sales meyer: ornamenlale formenlehre; three hundred folio plates, in a portfolio. table showing the arrangement of the chapters and plates. division l the elements of decoration. a. geometrical elements. . network. - . band motives. - . diaper patterns. . the sector, polygon, and star. - . the square, ami itssubdivision. . the octagon, and its sub- division. . the triangle, hexagon, &c, and thoir subdivision. - . the oblong, and its sub- division. . the rhombus, and trapezium, and their subdivision. . the circle, its subivision, and intersections. . gothic tracery. . the ell ipse, and its subdivision. .b. natural forms. a. the organisms of plants (the flora of ornament). . the akanthos leaf. - . the artificial leaf. - . artificial foliage. - . the laurel, and olive. - . the vine. . the lotus, papyrus, and palm. . the ivy. . the corn, and convolvulus. . the hop, and bryony. . various leaves. - . various flowers. - . the fruit festoon. . the leaf, and flower festoon. b. animal organisms (the fauna ol ornament). - . the lion. - . the griffin, &c. - . the lion head. - . the panther head, *c the horso head, &c. - . the eagle. . the wing. - . the dolphin. . the shell. . tho serpent, &c. c. human organism. . the mask. - . the grottcsquo mask. . tho medusa head. . the grottesque. - . the half-figure. . the sphinx, and centaur. . the cherub-head, &c. c. artificial objects. - . the trophy. - . the symbol. - . the ribbon. . miscellaneous objects. vi table. division ii. ornament applied to features. a. bands. - . the fret band. . the chain band. - . the interlacement band. . the rosette band. . the palmetto band. . the vertebrate band. - . the undulate band. . the evolute-spiral band. . the enrichment of the astragal. . theenrichmentofthetorus. . the enrichment of the cynia. and the ovolo. b. free ornaments. - . the link border. . the cresting border. - . the akeroter, and antefix. . the stele crest. . the perforated cresting. - . the cross. - . the finial. . the finial-knob, and vase. . the pendant-knob. . the rosette. . the crocket, and gargoyle. . the hinge, &c. . the tassel. . the fringe, and valence. . the lace border. c. supports. the foliated shaft. the fluted shaft. the base. . . - . . the decorated shaft. . the profiled shaft. - . the capital. . the pilaster panel. - . the pilaster capital. . the candelabrum base. . the candelabrum shaft. . the candelabrum capital. . the balauster. . the terminus. . the parapet. . the railing post. . the furniture leg. - . the trapezophoron. - . the console. . the bracket. - . the caryatid, atlante, ac. d. enclosed ornaments, or panels. - . the square panel. . the star-shape panel - . the circular panel. - . the oblong panel. . the elliptic panel. - . the lunette, and spr.nrail panel. . the lozenge panel. - . various panels. e. repeating ornaments, or diapers. . the square diaper, &c. . the circle diaper, &c. . the scale diaper, ac. - . the circle diaper, &c . - . various diapers. . various grill diapers. division hi. decorated objects. a. vases, sac. . fundamental vase-forms. holders. . the amphora . the urn. . the krater. . the basin, and di«h. . theampulla,alabastron,&c. . the flower-vase, &c. . vase forms for various purposes. . the jar, and cist. . the font, and holy-water stoup. t tablk. dippers. . the hydria. . the bucket, &c. . the spoon, and ladle. c. pourers. . the prochoiis, oinochos, olpe, &c. . the lekythus. g- . the lip-spout pitcher. . the pipe-spout pot. w - . the bottle. d. drinking vessels. . the kylix, kantharos, ac. . the rhyton. . the cup, and beaker. . the chalice, and goblet. . the hanap. . the rummer or rsmer. . various drinking vessels. . the mug. . the tankard. . modern drinkmg glasses. j . metal objects. a. utensils for illumination. - . the candelabrum. . the antique lamp. - . the candlestick. . the hand-candlestick . the candlo-bracket. . the pendant-lamp. . the chandelier. . modern lamps. b. religious utensils. . the altar. . the tripod. . the censer. . the crucigx. . the crozier, and mon- strance. c- utensils of war and hunting; weapons. . the shield. . the helmet . thesword, and its scabbard. . the dagger, and its scab- bard. . the halberd, &c. a. table utensils. . the spoon. ml . the knife, and fork, . the papcr-knife. . the scissors. . the hand-bell. e. various domestic utensils, ic g. the door-knocker. . the kev. . the hand-mirror. . the fan. . various tools. c. furniture. a. seats. - . the chair. - . the throne, and arm-chair. . the stall. . the stool. . the folding-chair . the bench. . the sofa, and con^i. b. tables. . the table . the writing-table. c. cabinets. . the cabinet. . the sideboard. . the hanging-cabinet. . the chest. d. miscellaneous. . the desk, and easel. . the clock-case, and toilet cabinet. - . the bedstead, and cradle. d. frames, ic. - . the architectural frame. - . the mirror-frame, &c. - . the strap-work frame. - . the typographical frame. . the strap-work tablet. . the strap-work border, and margin. e. jewelry. . the pin. . the button. . the ring. . the chain. . the necklace. . the bracelet. viii table. . the girdle, buckle, and clasp. . the pendant . . the ear-ring. . miscellaneous jewelry. f. heraldry. . tinctures, and divisions, of the shield. . shapes of the shield. . ordinaries. - . charges. . forms of the helmet. s - . helmet trappings. . crowns. coronets, &c heraldic accessories. o. writing, printing, t&c . romanesque letters. - . gothic uncial letters. . old english letters, &c . old german letters. . modern texts. . renaissance letters. . roman initials. . roman letters. . constructions, numerals, monograms. a. geometrical elements and motives. geometrical ornament is the primordial or oldest of the elements of decoration. the implements of savages, and the tattooing of the indians, prove this. the seam, with the thread running slant-wise from one piece to the other, may have been the original for the zigzag line; and woven-work, of warp and woof of every kind, the original for reticulated patterns; and the plaited hair that of the plaited band. the revolutions of a fork-like instrument led to the dis- covery of the circle; the combination of dots, at regular intervals, to the polygon or pointed - star. the gradual developement of these original geometrical forms, rising from stage to stage with the growth of culture and knowledge, led finally to geometrical artistic forms such as we see in moorish panelled ceilings, in gothic tracery, in guilloche-work, and the like. the developement of geometry into a science, with its theorems and proofs, also came to the assistance of art. as evidence of this, we need only refer to the construction of the ellipse from given lengths of axes. the majority of all geometrical ornaments may be divided into three groups. they are either continuous and ribbon-like (bands), or in enclosed spaces (panels), or in unlimited flat patterns. in every case the foundation of the geometrical ornament will be a certain division, a subsidiary construction, or a network. we will begin with the last; and pass in turn to the ribbon motives, the flat patterns, and the figure motives. !• network. — band motives. network. (plate .) the systems of subsidiary lines required in geometrical patterns, e. g.: parquets, mosaics, window-glazing, &c, are termed nets. the name explains itself. they may be of very various kinds. the most frequent are quadrangular and triangular reticulations, combined of single squares or equilateral triangles. a special network, resembling the plait of a cane chair, is required for some moorish patterns. plate . network. . ordinary quadrangular. equal divisions are set off in one direc- tion, parallels are drawn through the points of division, and the former cut by a line at an angle of °. the points, where these diagonals cut the parallels, mark the divisions in the opposite direction. . oblique quadrangular. the divisions are set-off on a vertical line and the parallels are then drawn at an angle of " on each side of the points of division. . straight, with alternate divisions. construction similar to no. . . oblique quadrangular, with alternate divisions. construction similar to no. . . moorish diapers. . enlarged detail to no. . . triangular net. it is based on the construction of the equi- lateral triangle; and may be arranged in two attitudes, as shown in figs. and . and . enlarged details to fig. . band motives. (plates — .) plates , and contain a number of band motives. these are made by the joining of regularly-placed points: those in plate nre joined by straight lines; those in plate by arcs; and those in plate by a combination of both. each of the plates contains, beneath the motives, specimens of their application, taken from different styles. plate . band motives, in straight lines. , , and . greek. . zigzag lines. . moorish plaited hand. and . these examples may be illustrated by folded strips of paper. geometrical elements. mm \ / | in v \ / / \ / \ / \ / \ plato . band motives. geometbical elements band motive?. plate .saapok pnsg baud motives. — diaper patterns. and . carvings in basrelief from the implements of savages . greek rase painting, motive: the seam. . waves with lotus, egyptian wall-painting, (owen jones). plate . band motives, m arcs. and . undulate lines. . motive of the "strung coin" pattern (coins threaded on a cord). . romanesque ornament from an evangeliarium written for charle- magne, th century, library of the louvre, paris. . romanesque mural painting, swedish church. . chinese damaskeened ornament from a vase, (racinet). plate . band motives, mixed. . romanesque glass painting, church of s. urban, troyes. . frieze, house, beaune, th century, (racinet). n. b. where two arcs are joined: it is necessary, in order to avoi. the symbol. iso the symbol in pilasters, by the sculptoi hauptmann, modern, staircase of museum, dresden. . ecclesiastical art, . architecture and sculpture, . painting, . antique art, . christian art, . art, . sculpture, plate . the symbol. . banner, of the architectural school of the polytecbnicum, carls- ruhe. . chemistry. . mathematics. . mechanical engineering. . civil engineering. ! forestry. . post and commerce, polytechnicum at carlsruhe, designed by q. kachel. . mechanical engineering, j . the mechanic, [ (gerlach, allegorien und embleme). . smithery, . navigation and commerce, tuileries, paris, (baldus). plate . the symbol. . navigation, \ . agriculture, i music i vovn front of the tuileries, pans, (baldus). . farming, > — . war, border of a copper plate engraving, by heinrich goltzius ( — ). . hunting and fishing, by stuck of munich, (gerlach, alle- gorien und embleme). . forestry, . sword-making, . musketry, ^ (gerlach) . farriery, . smithery. the eibbon. (plates — .) ribbons are not used alone, but are frequently employed as a decoration of garlands and festoons (comp. plates , , ), of sym- bols (comp. plates — ), or they are labels to bear some motto (comp. plate ). the ribbons of the antique are simple, often ter- minating in a ball or acorn like knob; the middle ages, particularly artificial objects. the ribbon, and the label plate . artificial objects. plate . the ribbon. artificial objects. miscellaneous objects. plate . the ribbon. — miscellaneous objects. the gothic, make them curled and quaint"; in the renascence they are developed in various free and elegant styles, often divided at the ends like a pennon. in the louis xvi. style they are often peculiarly crinkled, but in spite of this mannerism they are not without a cer- tain decorative charm, (comp. plates and ). plate . the ribbon, and the label. . label for motto, on the seal of the town of schiltach, gothic, inscription on the scroll: "s. opidi schilttach". . ribbon, from jost amman's wappen- und stammbuch, german renascence. . ribbon, painting by b. zeithlom, carlsruhe gallery, gothic . label for motto, old germain painting, school of cologne, carls- ruhe gallery. . label for motto, triumphal car, by hans burgkmair, — , german, (hirth). . label for motto, albrecht dttrer's "der eiilen seyndt alle vogel neydig und gram," german renascence, (hirth). plate . the ribbon. . ribbon and knot, after daniel mignot, german renascence. . ribbon and knot, the louis xvi. style, (lievre). . ribbon and knot for a bunch of fruit, after prof. sturm of vienna, (storck's zeichenvorlagen). . drapery festoon, (raguenet). miscellaneous objects. (plate ). finally, among the artificial objects which are used in decora- tion, especially of pilasters, we may mention those forms like cande- labra and vases, from which ornaments, like growing plants, usually rise, (comp. plates and ). cornucopias, torchessmall inscription tablets, and many other objects, are introduced. plate . miscellaneous objects. . vase, window pilaster of the cancelleria, rome, by bramante. ita- lian renascence, (de vico). . vase, pilaster of a door, san angostino, rome, (de vico\ . vase, lower part of a panel, italian renascence. . vase, tomb of louis ql, st . denis, french renascence. . vase, louis xvl style, (f. a. m., cours d'ornement). . crossed torches, upper part of pilaster, by benedetto da majano, italian renascence. . crossed torches, renascence. - introduction. the second division of the handbook deals with ornament as applied in decorative features. they will be arranged according to their function, and treated in accordance with the mutual relations of the decorative form and its application. every one acquainted with decoration, must have been struck by the fact that on certain objects and on certain parts of them the decoration invariably appears to have been modelled on the same principle, no matter how much the selected motives may vary from each other or belong to special styles. in decoration, as elsewhere, there is a right and a wrong use for everything; each object, even the very smallest, requires its own proper form and decoration, and the artist who understands style will give these, though in many cases unconsciously; artistic instinct guiding one man where another must study laboriously. be this as it may, the relations are there. a socle ornament cannot be reversed and used as a frieze without modification; a column, which looks beautiful and even delicate on monumental archi- tecture, may produce a clumsy effect if reduced and applied to furni- ture; no one finds fault with the or flutings of it in archi- tecture, but half of them would more than suffice for the smaller cabinet and so on. the achievements of those periods, in which the intimate connection between form, aim and material was either unknown or forgotten, are what might be expected. the empire style, which copied the antiqne at the instance of an august per- sonage; and, in so doing, produced work which is classical in respect of its mannerisms; is an example. a greek temple and an arm chair are two different things; each has its own peculiarities; and must be fashioned and decorated in accordance therewith. it were an insoluble problem to give a formula for each case; and to attempt to do so lies beyond the scope of this handbook. but we will attempt to bring together some important groups from the entire field; and by means of them to illustrate the principles of design. a. bands. the group of bands includes all those ornamental forms which are used to give expression to the ideas of bordering, framing, and connecting. the motives are partly geometrical, partly organic, chiefly plant- forms; artificial forms being more rarely used. the band has no "up" or "down"; but only an onward or an outward tendency. it has no limitation in regard to length; but is generally a narrow, ribbon-like ornament. the proper application of bands is to the enclosing of ceilings, walls, floors, panels, on certain architectural constructions, on the abacus and the plinth of columns, and as a running ornament round the shaft of the latter. they are further used as the hem or border of garments, carpets and other textiles; as borders in typography, on the rims of plates or dishes, or to separate the ground from the rim, &c. the principal ornaments in this group arei the fret; chain and interlaced patterns (guilloche); foliated bands in the various forms of rosette, palmette, flower, leaf, and scroll bands, &c. the evolute spiral band (plate ) stands to a certain extent on the borderline between bands and free ornaments. leaf patterns, and the egg-and-tongue which has been devel- oped from them, are not bands at all, in the strict sense of the word. they express the mediation between the support and the weight, for which reason they are used as the enrichment of mouldings. they are here included among bands in order to avoid an independent group for the sake of the one plate. as a matter of fact, they do often appear as bands (the egg-and-tongue as a decoration of plate medallions, sec). the fret band. the fret band. (plates — .) the greek fret (or meander border) is, as it name indicates, a specifically greek ornament, and no doubt of textile origin. its accomodation to the rectangular network suggests this. the name "meander" is said to be derived from a river of asia minor, the maeandros, now the menderes, which flows in sinuous curves. although the forerunners of the greek border are to be found in the assyrian and egyptian styles, it was greek vase-painting and architecture which gave rise to the variations of the pattern; architecture also employed it plastically. among other applications in the roman style it was used for mosaics on floors and often — contrary to the principles of style of flat ornaments — in those parallel perspective representations in which it seems as if it were a plastic ornament, (plate . ). the middle ages seldom used the fret (one example will be found on plate . ); but similar forms are common in the chinese and japanese styles (plate . ). the renascence revived the fret in its ancient application; made new combinations; and sometimes interlaced it with plant motives (plate . ). although very commonplace, the fret still has a good effect when it is applied in the proper manner. its construction is very simple. in general — although not always — the breadth of the broad lines or ornament is equal to the distance between them; we therefore draw a square network as shown on plate , fig. , then draw all the horizontal lines (the measure- ment of the lengths and the observance of the rhythmic regularity peculiar to each greek pattern are the only difficulties), and then join their ends by means of perpendiculars, (plates and ). centres are formed by arranging the axis at a suitable place, and reversing the pattern, (plate . and ). angle junctions may be similarly arranged by cutting the pattern diagonally to the square net at a suitable place, and reversing as before, (plate . , and ). the angle-treatment of current frets is more difficult (plate : figs. , , and ). the end of a fret with only one row may be formed by outting the pattern short at a suitable spot; where two or more rows run parallel to or cross each other, they may be combined so as to form proper endings (plate . ). the pattern is sometimes carried round a circle; but this is an arrangement which is quite out of accordance with its character. the square network is not always applicable to cases in which the fret has to be repeated within a given length. in this case the divi- sions of length are either elongated or compressed by drawing the auxiliary lines at a greater or less angle than ° (this is shown on plates and ). the fret band. — the chain band. plate . unsymmetrical ob current frets: greek vase paintings. — . ordinary, simple patterns. . elongated pattern. . raking pattern. — . patterns which are interrupted ty rosettes, stars, &c. — . abnormal pattern, formed by fragments, instead of a contin- uous line. plate . reciprocating frets. — . ordinary, simple patterns. . double pattern, greek., . intersecting pattern, louvre, paris. and . fragmentary pattern, greek, and modern. and . symmetrical double pattern, greek. — . ornamented patterns. plate . intersecting frets, &c. i— . ordinary patterns, greek vase paintings. .. abnormal pattern, japanese metal vessel. . pattern in parallel perspective, roman mosaic pavement. . mediaeval folded-tape pattern, resembling the fret, (racinet). . pattern ornamented with laurel, louvre, paris. plate . ends, angles, and centres, of frets. , and . free, unsymmetrical angle treatment s, , , and . symmetrical angles. and . centre treatments. ii— . ends of patterns. antique motives, except no. (chinese), and no. (modern). the chain band. (plate .) the basis of the design is the chain. the chain band is there- fore cemposed of circular, elliptical, square, or lozenge shaped links, which are either represented all in front view (as in , , and ), ort alternately in profile (as in , , , and ). the chain pattern probably occurs sporadically in every style. that chain-bands have not been more frequently used, although they are a simple and effective mode of decoration, may be due to the fact that the chain appeared to a certain degree to he too force- ful, too vigorous in its effect. at any rate, delicacies of artistic feel- mejer, handbook of ornament. bands plate . the fret band. bands. bands. plate . the fret band. bands. the fret band. riate . bands. plate . the chain band. the chain band. — the interlacement band. ing, which have found expression elsewhere, and often unconsciously, seem to point to this conclusion. the construction of such bands is simple; and in the case of those illustrated may be understood from the plate itself. plate . the chain band. — . modern decorative painting. — . carved wooden ceiling, townhall, jever, german, ronascence. toe interlacement band. (plates — .) the interlacement band includes all those bands which are for- med of a number of lines interlaced or plaited together. they are usually symmetrical to the longitudinal axis; and may be produced indefinitely. the principle is that the interlacing broad lines shall pass over and under one-another alternately. rope patterns are used as borders in painting, in textiles, in pottery, intarsia, and the ornamentation of manuscripts; in architect- ure on the under sides of stays and beams, on archivolts (the arches of doors and windows), in the soffits of arches, sometimes in a frieze, and often as the enrichment of the torus moulding. interlacement patterns are used in all styles, though in some they are more popular than in others. and in this ornament the indivi- duality of each style is very strongly marked. in the antique: the ornament consist of wavy interlacing bands round regularly-placed knobs or eyes. the wavy lines are composed of arcs or of arcs and straight lines, in which latter case the arcs make tangential junctions with the straight lines (plate ). in flat ornament the interlacing lines are distinguished from each-other by shading or by colour; in plastic ornamentation they are fluted or channelled. the interlacement patterns of the middle ages — chiefly of the byzantine and romanesque periods — make use of antique forms; adding to them the angular bend (plate . — ). in the so called northern styles — celtic, anglo-saxon, norman, scandinavian, and old frankish: it is the most conspicuous ornament. here we meet extremely complicated and richly combined interlacings. mostly freely drawn, without the aid of the compasses. it is cha- racteristic, and remarkable in regard to these styles, that tho same band appears in sections of different colours in their ornament. the works of owen jones and racinet contain numerous examples, mostly from old illuminated manuscripts: our plate ( — ) reproduces some of the simplest (reconstructed with the compasses). the interlacement band. the moorish style favours a peculiar interlacement. it is cha- racteristic that the bands, which are always straight, make angles of s or °, and are adapted to a network as shown on plate , fig. s. here, too, we find the alternate colouring of the single bands. numerous examples will be found in owen jones, racinet, and prisse d'avennes, "l art arabe", a selection from these being given in plate , figs. — . the other oriental styles exhibit greater variety in this respect; and .also employ round forms, (plate .! und ). the renascence developed great variety. besides the traditional forms of the antique, peculiar constructions appear, chiefly to be met-with in the arts of inlaying, on book-cover decoration, in pewter chasing, and typographical borders, (plate ). modern art borrows from all styles; and, as was also the case in the middle ages and the renascence, intersperses its patterns with foliage, (plate ). plate . the interlacement band. — . ordinary antique patterns, single, double, and triple. — . elongated antique patterns, single, double, and triple. . antique pattern, doubly interlaced, with unequal waves. . antique pattern with two rows, terracotta painting. construction: first mark the centres of the eyes: in and these lie on the points cf intersection of a triangular net; in and on those of a diagonal square net. the rest will be understood from the figure. plate . the interlacement band. . romanesque patterns, decoration of archivolt, segovia. . byzantine pattern, sta. sofia, constantinople. — . northern patterns, manuscript ornaments of the th and th century, (racinet.) plate . the interlacement band. — . simple moorish patterns, alhambra, granada. . persian pattern, metal vessel, (racinet). . russian oriental pattern, (viollet le due, "l'art russo"), plate . the interlacement band. — . patterns, wood and ivory inlaid work, italian renascence. . pattern, by domenico de fossi, of florence, th century, (raguenet). . intarsia pattern, sta. maria in organo, verona; in the original the interstices are enriched by plant sprays. bands. b the interlacement band. plate . hands plate . the interlacement band. bands. plate . the interlacement band. bands. the interlacement band. — the rosette band. . title border of a mathematical work, printed in paris, oronce fine, , (hirth> . soffit ornament, entrance of the otto heinrich building, hei- delberg, to , (musterornamente). plate . the interlacement band. — . angles of border, modern french, (raguenet). . edge of a modern damask border, (gewerbehalle). — . modern borders, (bstticher, "ornamentenbuch"). . modern wood in tarsia, (gewerbehalle). the rosette band. (plate .) the term "rosette band" is a general name for rosette, spray and other bands, when the rosette is the leading characteristic the single rosettes, which are similar to conventional roses seen in front- view, are either in immediate juxtaposition (plate . and ), or divided by channels (plate . ), by calices (plate . , , ), or by stalks and sprays (plate . , , , ). the rosette bands are either current, that is, they have a definitive direction sideways; or they are entirely without direction, that is, they are symmetrical, not only from top to bottom but also from right to left. by allow- ing the rosettes to overlap we get a band more or less identical with the so called strung-coin, or "money-moulding", (plate . and ). rosette bands are especially common in the assyrian style, in antique vase painting, in the medieval enamels (cologne enamel), in the indian style, in the renascence, and in the modern styles. plate . the rosette band. . antique vase painting. . modern decorative pattern. antique bronze shield. and . antique patterns, after jacobsthal. . neck of a greek hydria. . . latin evangeliarum, written by godescald for charlemagne, th century, (racinet). . enamel ornament, the great reliquary, aachen. (racinet). . indian enamel border, (prisse d'avennes). . indian carving, (owen jones). . intarsia border, sta. maria in organo, verona, , (muster- ornamente). . popular renascence pattern. . pattern, persepolis. . plastic border, louis xvi. style, (raguenety bands. plate . the palmette band. tbo palmette band. — the vertebrate band the palmette band. (plate .) the palmette is a specifically greek kind of ornament. like the fin- gers of an outspread hand (palma, the palm of the hand) a group, odd in number, of narrow, entire leaves is combined into a symmet- rical ornament. the centre leaf is the largest; and the leaves diminish gradually as they approach the sides. the tips of the leaves lie on a regular curve. the lower ends of the leaves are disconnected, divi- ded from each other by slight intervals, and usually spring from a tongue-shaped leaf. the delicate sensitiveness of greek artistic feeling finds a striking expression in this ornament. it is applied in mani- fold ways, e. g: as antefixes and akroters, as cornice-decoration (comp. the group of free ornaments), and as palmette borders. in rare cases the palmette ornaments are in juxtaposition without anything between them — this is usually the case on the lekythos (a greek vessel for oil, &c.) plate . — in the majority of cases the palm- ettes are connected or bordered by spiral bands (plate . . &c.). palmette ornaments are of frequent occurrence on greek vessels, and on the friezes of their architecture. where they occur in later styles: it is only sporadically; and the severe classical beauty is not retained. plate . the palmette band. . , and . paintings, greek, terracotta vessels. . and . greek, friezes. . intarsia, italian renascence. . modern, wrought iron trellis. the vertebrate band, &c. (plates — .) leaf bands are generally numerous in all styles; and as varied as are the modes of their application. the leaved stalk, with or without flowers, fruits, &c., is the simplest natural motive. the various plants are used as a basis, partly with, partly without, symbolical reference. the antique chiefly availed itself of the laurel, olive, and ivy; the middle ages used the vine, clover, thistle, and maple; the renascence shows the artificial leaf. to these traditional patterns: modern art has added some others which are specially adapted for naturalistic representation, such as the convolvulus, the passion-flower, the hop, &c. thus we find in the antique: a succession of buds (plate . ); straight stalks with leaves, either attached or free (plate . , ); or undulating stalks, with leaves, fruit, or flowers (plate . , , ). mayer, handbook of ornament. the vertebrate band, & the undulate band. the latter mode was retained in the medieval style; in the roman- esque style the stalks are more comprised, and the lobes of the leaves fully rounded (plate . , ); in the gothic style the former are thin and extended, the latter slit and pointed. extremely common are the two forms depicted on plate . and . characteristic of the late gothic is the example , plate ; this kind of ornament- ation is excellently adapted for simple wood-carving and stamped leather-work. the oriental conception, in textile fabrics and by the engraved and inlaid metal-work, is shown (plate . — ). intarsia technique, leather-stamping, weaving, and the ornamenta- tion of manuscripts offered the renascence opportunity to make use of, and to vary the floral border with" advantage (plate ). inter- lacement and floral patterns are frequently combined in the same example (plate . and ). as examples of modern art, the naturalistic borders figured on plate . — . are given. when the main-stem runs longitudinally along the centre of the band; like the vertebral- column in the skeletons of animals, then the arrangement is termed vertebrate. when the main-stem oscillates from side to side (as in plate . , , & ), then the arrangement is termed undulate. plate . the vertebrate band, &c. — . paintings, greek, terracotta vessels. — . french, mural paintings, th century, (racinet). . glass window, cathedral, bourges, th century, (racinet). . medieval. . intarsia, sta. maria in organo, verona, . . modern, plate-border. plate . the undulate band. — . persian, metal vessels, (racinet). . indian. . byzantine, glass mosaic, san marco, venice, (musterornamente). . portion of romanesque initial, th century, berlin museum. . romanesque, portal of cathedral, lucca, (musterornamente). s. gothic flat carving, end of th century, (musterornamente). . medieval, mural painting, swedish church. . french, mural painting, th century, (racinet). . early gothic, french. . gothic, manuscript ornamentation. . late gothic, flat carving, th century, (musterornamente). bands. the vertebrate band, &c. tlale . ' bands. plate . the undulate band. bands. t plate . the undulate band, &c the undulate band. — the evolute-spiral band. plate . the undulate band, &c. — . leather stamping, th century, schwabisch hall, (muster- ornaments). . terracotta frieze, castle of schalaburg, lower austria, (wiener bauhiitte). . intarsia frieze, from the same castle. — . borders of robes, tombs in niederstetten and lensiedel, th century, (musterornamente). . renascence, manuscript ornament. — . german renascence, (hirth, formenschatz). . archivolt of door, otto-heinrich building heidelberg castle, german renascence. . french, renascence. plate . toe undulate band, &c. . border, picture by domenico zampieri, th century, (muster- ornamente). . border, half-columns, sta. trinita, florence, italian ro nascence. . intarsia frieze, stalls, san domenico, bologna, italian re- nascence. . wrought-iron trellis of balcony, milan, (gewerbehalle). . frieze, italian renascence. . modern, (cesar daly). . modern. — . laurel and oak borders, (gewerbehalle). — . modern borders, (gewerbehalle). the evolute-spiral band. (plate .) the wave of the sea has been suggested as the motivo of this "wave" pattern; but its origin is purely geometrical. the. line of the evolute-spiral pattern divides the surface of the bonier into two parts, which in flat ornamont are coloured differently. in plastic work, for which tho pattern is also suitable, the lower part projects. in wrought-iron-work: tho curved line runs freely between two bars. this pattern is adapted for borders of robes, shields, and plates; for uso on vessels, friezes, cornices, and tablets in architecture; and also as borders, for tapestries, and mural-paintings. a rosotto is often placed at tho volute-ceutrcs (date . and ); tho intorslices between tho linos are sometimes decorated with loaves and flower-buds (plato . — ). this occurs chiefly in the renascence period, when iho antiquo seemed loo simple how the evolutc-spiral band. — the enrichment of the bead moulding. far this may be carried, in some cases, in shown by fig. , in which the evolute-spiral line is nothing more than the skeleton of the orna- ment . the middle ages did not use this form at all.. angles, and centres are arranged as shown on figs. — . this band is excellently adapted for the framing round circular panels. plate . tiie evolute- spiral. — paintings, antique vessels. — . angles. . central junction. . pattern round a circular panel. . painting of a stove tile, german renascence, germanisches museum, nuremberg. , . modern borders. border, by sebastian serlio, th century. frieze, "otto-heinrich building of heidelberg castle. wrought-iron trellis, temple of apollo in the garden ol the castle at schwetzingen. . painting, palazzo ducale, mantua, italian renascence. the enrichment of the bead moulding. (plate .) bead, or astragal, is the name given to those small balf-round mouldings, which are often enriched by ornaments like pearls, strung together, c, or as turned bands ami cords. generally they are only used in plastic art, and as a rule not alone; but below the egg- and-leaf ornaments, and similar cornice profiles (plate ). they also occur as intermediate members between the shaft and the capital of columns. beads are enriched with balls, discs, or ovals, in rather more than half relief. the simplest bead-enrichment is formed of round pearls, either close together or permitting the representation of the thread to show between them. disc and oval enrichments are seldom used alone, but arranged alternately, as shown in figs. to in addition to the simple examples of the antique, the renas- cence uses richer forms, the single members being again ornamented, profiled and more arbitrarily fashioned (plate . and ), or finished-off with small leaf calices (plate . and ). wood carving avails itself of strung discs seen in perpective (plate . ). the enrichments may also suggest torsion. after the moulding is made, it is set-out like a screw, as indicated by the auxiliary constructions in figs. — . leaves or pearls sometimes lie in the hollows and follow the thread of the screw (plate . ). bands the evolute-spiral bund. plate . mouldings. plate . the enrichment of the bead moulding. the enrichment of the astragal, the torus, and other mouldings. hore also must be grouped those ribbons rolled spirally round rods, such as we find in the art of the middle ages and the re- nascence (fig. ). corners are generally covered with a small leaf. plate . the enrichment of the bead moulding. — . simple enrichments, antique. — . richer enrichments, renascence. — . beads enriched like twisted ropes. . spiral-ribbon enrichment, louvre, paris. the enrichment of the torus moulding. (plate .) torus is the name given to those larger mouldings of semi- circular or semi-elliptic section, such as are specially used in archi- tecture on the bases of coluihns and pilasters, on socles, on mediaeval door and window arches, and on the ceiling mouldings of the renascence and modern times. while the smaller beads are ornamented with pearls and twisted cords, these more important mouldings are dec- orated by enrichments which resemble a bundle of rods round which ribbons aro twisted at suitable places (figs. and ); by surrounding them with plaited or net work (figs. , , ); by clothing them with foliage (figs. , , ); or by combining the various systems (figs. and ). in modern times the torus is enriched by bound clusters of fruit . water-leaves, artificial leaves with serrated margins, laurel, oak, ivy, &c are most in use for the leaf ornaments. as in the case of fruit clusters: ribbons are twined spirally at suitable placed round the fruit or foliage (figs. , and ). all these examples are drawn by first marking-off the divisions on the profile, as indicated on the figures. plate . the enrichment op the torus moulding. — . modern. — . antique. — . antique, decorated with laurel and oak. . mediaeval. . mediaeval, decoration of an archivolt, gelnhausen, th century. . temple of jupiter, rome. — . louvre, paris, french renascence, (baldus). toe enrichment of other mouldings. (plate .) the egg-and-tongue enriches, in architecture, the ovolo moulding of capitals, and the lower members of cornices, &c mouldings. mouldings. the enrichment of the cyma, and ovolo mouldings. plate . the enrichment of mouldings. in these cases it harmonises the support and the weight; and has also a decorative purpose as a bordering member. the leaf enrichment may be explained in the following way: a row of leaves, growing upwards, supports the* weight, and is bent outwards by its pressure (fig. ). if this only occurs partially, we have the doric form (fig. ). if the leaves are bent-down tow- ards their lower ends (fig. ), we obtain forms like the so-called "lesbian cymatium." a false conception, which regarded the leaf-shape merely as a geometrical element, afterwards gave rise to the corrupt forms of the late greek and roman styles (figs. a, a, and b). if the simple waterleaf be replaced by more richly serrated ones like the artificial leaf, we obtain examples'like fig. . figure shows the egg pattern, from which all the more or less misunderstood varieties have, in course of time, been derived. the dart-shaped intermediate leaves have often been developed into actual darts; and the eggs or curved surfaces of the leaves have also been covered with independent ornamentation, in complete defiance of their origin (figs. and ). the corner is treated, either by freely carrying the pattern over into a palmetto anthemion (figs. and ), or by covering it with independent leaves. further details on the subject of this chapter will be found in botticher's tektonik der hellenen. plate . the enrichment of the cyma and ovolo mouldings. and . drawings to illustrate the origin of the pattern. . graeco-doric, painted. . leaf, erechtheum, athens. and . corrupt leaf, (bstticher). . roman leaf, (jacobsthal). . greek egg-and-tongue., erechtheum, athens. . campana egg-and-tongue, graeco-italic, campana collection. . colossal egg-and-leaf, temple of jupitor tonans, rome. . roman egg-and-dart, arles cathedral, (raguenet). — . renascence egg-and-dart, (raguenet). . modern egg-and-dart, (raguenet). a free ornaments. those ornaments, which are applied to suggest the end or finish of an object, may be classed in a group which, following an ex- pression already introduced, are termed "free ornaments", the word "free" implying not a severoly-enclosed baud or panel, but a freely- treated edge-ornament. the edging may be arranged to grow .in an upward, downward, or lateral direction; the character of the ornamentation will be depen- dent on these conditions. endings with an upward direction are most, numerous; and as plants, with their natural, upward growth, are adapted for this purpose, foliated ornament is the usual decoration of akroters, antefixes, steles, ridges, and finials. crosses, knobs, rosettes, and pendants, are independant free- ornaments, which are generally geometrical in their treatment. in tassels and fringes, which form endings in a downward direction, tho organic plant motive is, of course, excluded; while lace (woven, pillow, itc.) avails itself of both motives, either singly or combined. crockets aro fohated excrescences which are popular in tho gothic style as an ornament of the edges, and ribs of buildings gargoyles (as are termed the rain spouts winch occur so fre- quently in the architecture of tho middlo ages and the renascence) are also freo ornaments with a lateral direction; they havo often tho form of figures, less often those of decorated channels. the link border. the link border. (plates — .) link borders are so termed because the transversely-growing foliage is connected together by scrolls which serve this purpose, like the "links" of a chain. of this class are much decoration of cornices, crestings in architecture, and fringes in textile art. besides these, link borders, which may be enlarged at will, and have a de- finite direction upwards or downwards, are used in a similiar manner as borders as edgings for carpets, plates, and panels; as borders for walls, floors, and ceilings (in which case the edging almost invariably grows outwards); on the neck, body, and feet of vessels; and fre- quently in architectural friezes. palmetto leaves, connected by circles or by links, are adapted for edgings. the typical form is found on antique vessels and friezes; its forerunner is seen in the connected lily and pomegranate of the assyrian style. the link-border is found in every subsequent style, both flat, and in relief. it is generally composed of identical details, symmetrically re- peated. unsymmetrical and naturalistic forms are rarer, (plate , ). plate . the link border. . assyrian, painted bas-relief, khorsabud. . external margin, greek kylix, (lau). . greek hydria, (l'art pour tous). . greek, cyma. . mosaic ornament, san marco, venice, byzantine, (musterorna- mente). . medieval, mural painting, swedish church, (racinet). . old embroidery, eisleben, (vorbilder fur fabrikantcn und hand- worker). . painted, cathedral, brandenburg, (vorbilder fur fabrikantcn und handwerker). . illumination of a koran, tomb of the sultan el-ghury, th cen tury, (prisse d'avennes). . majolica dish, germanisches museum, nuremberg. . majolica dish, th century, (kunsthandwerk). . modern, (gewerbehalle). plate . the link border. . greek, carved frieze, erechtheum, athens. . roman, frieze, (fragments de l'architecture antique). . romanesque, frieze, th century, (musterornamente). the link border. — on mouldings. — the cresting . arabic, mosque of the sultan hassan, cairo, th century. . italian renascence, marble frieze, tomb of the conte ugone, badia, florence, (weissbach und lottermoser). . italian renascence, intarsia frieze, (meurer). . modern decoration, (eolb und hcgg, vorbilder flu* das orna- mentenzeichnen). the link border on mouldings. (plate .)- the cjma in architecture is the topmost or concluding member of a cornice. it is frequently used as a gutter. the section is some- times a concave or convex quadrant, but in most cases consists of two arcs curving inwards and outwards respectively, (fig. ). the ornamentation was merely painted in the earlier periods; but afterwards received a plastic form. it is chiefly composed of palmette leaves, either unconnected (fig. and ) or connected (figs. , and ), with lily cups between. artificial leaves, pointing up- wards and lying close on the profile with calices or water-leaves peep- ing out between them (fig. ) are also used. the middle ages used both systems, especially the latter, with the latter, with the modifications required by the changed forms of the leaves, (figs. and ). both the renascence and modern art follow the tradition of the antique; but give the palmette ornament a richer form, (figs. — ). plate . the link-border enrichment op mouldings. — . antique, (bfltticher). . roman altar. . graeco-italic terracotta ornament, (lievre). . romanesque cornice, house, metz, th century, (raguenet). . cornice, notre dame, paris, th century, (musterornamente). — . cornice, louvre, paris, french ren iscence. . marble frieze, tomb in sta. maria sopra minerva, rome, italian renascence. . modern, (arch. skizzenbuch). the cresting border. (plate .) crestings are intended to ornament the ridge or top of the roof. such ornaments have been especially popular in france from gothio mayer, handbook of ornamrnt. plate . the link border. plate . the link-border enrichment of mouldings. free ornaments. gc the cresting. — the akroter, &c. times to the present day. they are mostly of perforated work, and the top has usually a varied mass-shape. the materials used are stone, lead, wrought-iron, and, in modern times, zinc. similar ornaments are also found as finals of entablatures and attics, as well as on the balaustrades of galleries. cresting ornaments appear on gothic altars, shrines, chim- neypieces, &c., and in cast-iron on our modern stoves, railings, &c. the antique made no use of this form, although similar forms occur, as, for example, on the entablature of the well-known monu- ment of lysikrates. on the other hand, we must mention those valence-like borders which are seen on the terracotta reliefs of the campana collection, represented on figs. and . in most cases, these latter ornaments, if reversed, may be used as crestings. plate . the cresting border . gothic, (jacobsthal). . modern gothic, cast-iron. . modern french, castle of pierrefonds, restored by viollet-le due, (raguenet). . modern french, cour de cassation, paris, (raguenet). .. modern german, by gropius of berlin, (arch. skizzenbuch). — . graeco-italic borders, downward growth. the akroter, &c. (plates — .) the akroter is the feature which serves as on ornamental finish to the apex of a gable. antique temples bear this decoration in a great variety of materials: stone, terracotta, painted, plastic, and cast in metal. groups of figures, griffins, &c., were sometimes used for this purpose; but the usual features were slabs of marble, bearing a palmette ornament, the central decoration of which is sometimes a mask, (plate . ). smaller ornaments of a similar kind are found ranged along the lower roof line, in front of the imbrices; and these are termed antefixes. the middle ages and the renascence make no general use of the ante fix, but it occurs on modern monumental buildings in the antique style. the corner akroter which isusually found at the lower ends of the gable lines, consists of half the motive of the central one, (plate . ). plate . the akroter, and the antefix. . greek akroter, painted, temple of wingless victory, athens. . greek akroter, painted, acropolis,, athens. the akroter. — the stela crest. . greek antefix, parthenon, athens. . greek sepulchral stele-crest, in the form of an akroter. . graeco-italio akroter, terracotta, museum, perugia. — . front and side view of a corner akroter, (betticher). plate . the akroter, &a. . greek antefix, tropylaea, athens, (raguenet). . roman antefix, temple of jupiter stator, rome. . modern french antefix, theatre des celestines, lyons, archi- tect renaud, (raguenet). . modern french akroter, house in paris, architect renaud, (raguenet). . modern french akroter, orleans railway station, paris, archi- tect renaud, (raguenet). — . akroter and corner-akroter, fountain in the certosa near flo- rence, italian renascence. the stele crest. (plate .) the stele is the greek tomb-stone. it usually takes the form of an upright tablet, sometimes tapering towards the top; and bears an inscription. it is sometimes decorated with rosettes, garlands and figures. at the top is a plain cornice, on which an ornament, similar to the akroter, forms the crowning finish. although the akroter and the stele-crest often have a perfectly identical form (plate . shows a crest which might just as well have been an antefix), still the style of the crest is as a rule more severe; and it is characteristic of a great number of steles that they have not the striking palm- ette centre, which the akroter always possesses, (figs. and ). very often, too, the crest is so designed that the sides are extended, to make a larger feature, (figs. and ). these monuments, dedicated to the memory of the dead, show better than almost anything else the special individuality and beauty of greek ornament. plate . the stele-crest. . stele-crest, (stuart and revett, vulliamy, jacobsthal). . „ „ (jacobsthal). . „ „ ("l'art pour tous"). . „ „ (lievre). free ornaments. plate . the akroter, and the antefix. free ornaments. the akroter, &c. plate . plate . the stele crest. the perforated cresting. plate . the perforated cresting. — the cross. the perforated cresting. "(plate s.) in modern wood buldings, the dressings, intended to form an ornamental finish to the construction, are often perforated. the gable is decorated by a finial; smaller corner-ornaments are attached to the lower ends of the lines of the gable; the pro- jecting ends of the gable - rafters are also provided with barge-boards, both for decorative effect, and also, no doubt, to serve as a protection against the weather. the finials are fashioned as knobs of varied profile, with a direction downwards. the oblique lines of the gable and the horizontal lines of the roof are also covered with barge- boards. the material requires a special treatment; as the ornamentation must be large and broad, and have as many points of connection in itself as possible. wooden ornaments of this kind are found on pavilions, watchmen's huts, farm-houses of richer construction; country villas in the swiss cottage style, &o. among architectural works which deal with wood buildings and especially with the decoration of them: we may mention the works of h. bethke (details fiir dekorativen holzbau), from which the majority of the figures on plate have been taken. plate . the perforated cresting. i. top ornament of a gable, by the architect eisenlohr, of carls- rube. — . various barge-boards, (bethke). the cross. (plate .) the cross (latin crux, french croix) is the most important symbol of christian art, it symbolises the person of christ, christ- ianity and sacrifice. its decorative applications are innumerable, and of great variety. various fundamental forms of the cross have been distinguished and are known by different names. the greek (or st. george's) cross consists of two arms of equal length, bisecting each-other at right angles. in the latin cross the lower limb is lengthened. these two forms are those most often used. in the st. andrew's cross the arms cross each-other diagonally. st. anthony's (the egyptian or old testament cross) is a latin cross without the upper limb. omitting from consideration the crucifix, which represents the crucifixion of christ, we shall find the cross in the utmost variety free ornaments. tlate . the cross. the cross. — the finial of form on utensils and vessels, on robes and garments, on carpets and banners dedicated to religious uses; in heraldry, and as a free ornament to form the upper ornamental finial of architecture. in christian architecture: the cross is used as a finial on steeples and gables, on tombs, pulpits, &c. often it is employed alone, as a monument, (tomb, wayside and votive crosses). plate . the cross: in stone. . modern french, charterhouse glandior, (raguenet). . modern. . modern french, with the monogram of christ, genouilleux, (ra- guenet). . gable of a church, st. urban's, unterliraburg, schwabisch-hall. . tomb, churchyard, baret, th century. . modern french, pere-lachaise, paris, (raguenet). . steeple, st. pierre, montrouge, paris, (raguenet). . tomb, st. lazare, montpellier, (raguenet). . granite, tomb, becon, (raguenet). the cross in metal. (plate .) wrought-iron, and, in late years, cast-iron and zinc, are sometimes used as a material for steeple and gable crosses, as well as for monu- mental crosses. the ductile nature of wrought-iron admits of a rich, delicate execution of these objects. the german renascence, in parti- ticular, offers a wealth of forms in this respect. the framework usually consists of strong bar-iron; the orna- mental decoration is in flat or round iron, fastened to the frame by clamps or rivets. hammered foliage is sometimes added. in many cases the point of the steeple cross is decorated with a cock as weather-vane. the centre of monumental crosses is often occupied by a plate of metal, to contain the inscription. plate . the cross: in metal. — . mediaeval steeple crosses, franconia, (gewerbehalle). . modern steeple cross, (bad. gewerbezeitung). . steeple cross, st. ambroise, paris, architect ballu, (raguenet). — . 'wrought-iron tomb crosses, thiengen, th century. . the finial. (plate .) while the ordinary cross rises as a free-ornament in a vertical plane, the final makes a cross, in plan. it extends its arms not only s the finial in stone, and in metal. sideways, but also regularly to the front and back. crocket-like ad- ditions (comp. plate ) clothe the stem, which usually takes the form of an elongated four or eight-sided shaft. there may be one or more tiers of crockets. the finial serves to decorate spires, pinnacles, baldachins, tombs, &c, and is a specifically gothic ornament. the most beautiful forms are furnished by french gothic, from which most of the il- lustrations of our plate are taken. piate . the finial: in stone. . modern gothic . early gothic, (jacobsthal). . french gothic, (viollet-le-duc). . early gothic, cathedral, chartres, th century, (musterorna- mente). «— . modern, (viollet-le-duc). . modern, (bosc). the finial in metal. (plate .) in the artistic wrought-iron work of the middle ages, the re- nascence, and modern times, we find charming finials in the shape of idealised flowers. these decorations ore found on the tops of balaustrades, on the gables over doors, on brackets and chandeliers, on the supports of rain-spouts, on wall-anchors, &c leaves, volute-like spirals, bell-flowers, and ears, are arranged round a central axis of iron; in many cases the centre is formed by spindle-shaped spirals of wire. plate . the finial: in metal. . corner of a mediaeval grill, (viollet-le-duc). . part of a grill, toulouse cathedral, th century, (viollet-le-duc). . termination of a fountain, cluny museum, paris, th century, (l'art pour tous). . part of a spanish trellis gate, th century, (l'art pour tous). . part of a chancel screen, minster, freiburg, th century, (schau- insland). . wrought-iron, th century, (guichard). . terminal, bruges, th century, (ysendyck, documents classes de l'art). . modern, wrought-iron, ihne & stegmiiller, berlin. . modern, post, by ende & boeckmann, berlin, (gewerbehalle). . wrought-iron coronal; liinburg on the lahn, th century, (kachel, kunstgewerbliche vorbilder). . coronal, modern gate, c. zaar, berlin. plate . the finial, &c the finial knob, and vase. — the pendant knob. the finial knob, and vase. (plate .) knob is the term applied to ornamental terminations in the form of profiled bodies of revolution, naturalistic buds, fir-cones, &c. knobs are tmall features used as the terminations in architecture and furniture. they are also used on flag-staffs, bosses of shields, centre-pieces of rosettes, &c. the material, whether stone, wood, stucco, metal, &c., depends on the use to which they are to be applied. vases form another class of finials. they are preferentially used on tombs, doorposts, in the centre of divided pediments, on the attics of ornamental architecture, and instead of antefixes. plate . the finial knob, and vase. — . stone, milan cathedral, italian gothic, (eaguenet). . modern. . modern fir-cone. . modern vase, (bosc). . modern french, ministry of war, paris, (raguenet). — . modern french, house in the park monceau, architect tronquois, (raguenet). . lower end of a flag-staff or lightning-rod, (lienard) the pendant knob. (plate .) pendants are hanging terminations; reversed knobs, so to speak. in some cases, but not in all, the former may replace the latter. these pendants are more or less elongated bodies of revolution. the decoration is produced by the addition of leaves, scales, headings, nulls, &c. these being specially suitable to convex profiles, while the channelled treatment is better adapted to concave profiles. pendants, in stone, wood, stucco, or metal, are used as brackets for lamps (hence their french name: cul-de-lampe); and as the lower terminations of oriel-windows, pulpits, &c. in the latter case the pendants are generally only in half or threo-quarter relief from the wall. plate . the pendant knob. — . part of tripod, (jacobsthal). s. part of lantern, dijon, french renascence, (l'art pour tous) . lower end of a chandelier, th century, (l'art pour tous). . bracket under a piscina, french, th century, church, moret, (l'art pour tous). . modern, stucco-work. . modern, wood. » plate . the finial knob, and vase. free ornaments. ^ the pendant knob. plate . the kosette. the rosette. (plate .) • the rosette, strictly so called, is an artificial rose. in a wider sense any ornament of a circular shape, which radiates from a centre, may be termed a rosette. according to its execution and use: the rosette may be considered either as a free-ornament, or a panel- ornament. in the first case, it must always be plastic, project pro- minently and have some resemblance to the knob or pendant. in the latter case, it may be in low relief or be a flat ornament. here we have only to deal with the rosette as a free-ornament. considering the rosette from this point of view: its most im- portant application is as the boss in the centre of romanesque and gothic ribbed vaultings; and as the centre-piece of ceilings, of which we find numerous examples in the temples of the antique, the palaces of the italian renascence, and the vaulted cupolas of ecclesiastical and secular architecture. 'besides this, rosettes are found on fur- niture, gates and doors (the italian renascence makes the most lavish use of them in this capacity), and as the centre-pieces of modern ceilings, &c. in these cases, however, their quality as free-ornaments is less prominent. as regards the formal plan of rosettes: ti e flower motive is the commonest; geometrical motives are rarer, and motives from figures rarer still. the arrangement is usually in a series of zones; the growth is from the centre, outwards; and in the majority of cases is radial, that is at right angles to the bordering circle; but sometimes the leaves are curved. the rosette may have any number of divisions; but , , , , , , , or divisions are the rule; divisions into , , , &c., are as rare as divisions exceeding the number . the divisions may vary in the separate zones; but generally only so that the same divis'ons interlock, that is to say, the points of the leaves of one zone fall on the intervals between the leaves of the next. plate . tiie rosctte. . antique, of four divisions. . roman, of five divisions. . naturalistic, of six divisions. . romanesque boss, of four divisions, chapter-hall of the monastery of heiligcnkreuz near vienna, th century, (musterornamento). . early gothic boss, of three divisions, saiute-cbapelle, paris, . french, of four divisions, louis xiii, ( — ), (muster- ornamente). . italian, of five divisions, the door of the baptistery, parma, re nascence, (musterornamento). . modern french, ceiling-flower, stucco. the rosette. plate . plate . the crocket, and the gargoyle. the crocket, and the gargoyle. tiik crocket, and tuk gargoyle. (plate g). crocket is the designation applied to those excrescences which appear on the edges of spires, and pinnacles, and on the raking lines of gables, in the richer gothic styles. occurring at regular intervals, they form an ornamental interruption to the bald architectonic lines. at first of a rather naturalistic character (figs. and ), they otolved during the decay of the style a moro artificial character, as- suming bulbous forms (fig. ), which havo their own special peculiar- ities in england, france, and germany. crocket - ornamentation has more or less been copied from stone architecture in furniture, choir-stalls, ic. the aims of the latter (figs. g— ), and the miserero-seats, are often foliated hke a crocket. metal, and particularly wrought-iron work, frequently makes use of crockets, in forms suited to the nature of the material, (figs. - ). contrary to the modern method, by which the water that collects ou tho roofs of buildings is conveyed to earth through pipes, tho builders of thd middle agos and tho renascence discharged tho rain, clear of tho wall, by means of long projecting spouts. the spout wns used in the antiquo style in the form of lion heads, &c. in the ecclesiastical and monumental architecture of the middle ages they are termed gargoyles; and are mostly of stone. in dwelling houses thoy aro of sheet-metal; and they are either architectonically decorated (fig. ), or human, animal, or fantastic figures, treated in a comic manner, the water flowing through tho mouth or other orifices of tho body. copious material on tho subject of crockets and gargoyles will be found in raguenet's "materiaui et documents do l'architecturo". plate . the crocket, and the gargoyle. — . front and sido view of a plain gothic crocket, amiens cathedral, restored by viollet-le-due, (ragucnet). . gothic crocket, th century. . modern gothic crocket, paris, (raguenet). . gothic crocket milan cathedral, (raguenet). t). arm of a stall, salisbury cathedral, (raguenet). — . arms of stalls, monastery, maulhronn. — . wrought-iron, gothic, augsburg. . gargoyle, viollet-le-duc, eglise d'eu,• (raguenet). . gargoyle, bell-tower, st. sernin, toulouse, restored by viouet- lo-duc, (raguenet). . gargoyle, meauz cathedral, (raguenet). — . gargoyle, st. eustache, paris. (raguenet). i hi; tho decorated dingo, ac. tin: decorated hinge. &c . (plate .) the middle ages, and after thein the renasconco, brought the rtcvelopement of wrought metal-work to the highest state of perfection. here we havo to consider tho different kinds of bands, technically known, according to their shape, as hinge, strap, &c. although these bands were originally intended only to bind-to- gother the underlying wood construction of gates, doors, caskets, chests, &c., tho bald, practical form was soon made decorative; and this tho moro readily that the gothic principle of wood construction, with its narrow stave-like or matched strips of wood, offered only scanty opportunities of artistic decoration. delicate series of lines, designed as free-ornaments, start from the hinge and terminate as leaves and flowers. the heads of the necessary rivets and screws, themselves shaped as rosettes in the richer examples, give a pleasing relief. gothic usually applies the extended strap-hinge (figs. — ); while the renascence, in accord- ance with its principlo of bordering in wood constructions, prefers the shorter butt-hinge (figs. — ). in the latter epoch the surface of tho metal received further decoration trough the arts of etching, engraving, niello-work, &c. book-mounts, in particular, offered a wide field for the application of these arts. modern times have with justice devoted increased attention to these objects; and have restored them to the domain of art from which various causes had excluded them for almost a century. tho plate gives a- small selection from the copious material to bo found in museums and publications. plate . the df.corated hikce, &e. . gothic hinge, church-door, viersen near cologne, th century. — . plain terminations of hinges, hefner-alteneck collection, th century. — . terminations of hinges, town-hall, miinster. g. termination of hinge, prie-dieu, gelnhausen, th century, (musterornamente). . gothic hinge, door of a cabinet, town-hall, zwolle. . gothic hinge. . renascence hinge, old kaufhaus, on the limmat, zurich, . . renascence hinge, town-hall, augsburg, th century, (muster- ornamente). . renascence hinge, door in ettlingen, united collections, carls- ruhe. . door-hinge, german, , free imitation by prof. storck, (zeichenvorlagen). the decorated hinge, &c. plate . the tassel. — the fringe, and the valtdcc. the tassel. (plate .) the chief contributions of textile art to the group of free-orna- ments are tassels, fringes, and laces. the two latter are current edgings, the first, on the contrary, are the termination of the lower end of cords or of shaped draperies. thus we find tassels used on girdles, bell-pulls, and curtain-holders; as pendants from flags, 'standards, valences, cushions, table-covers, palls, and tent-covers; also on pouches, hoods, caps, harness, ac. the tassel consists of a tuft of threads or cords, hanging straiglt down from a core of wood, turned in various profiles, and decorated with twisted threads. the original may be assumed to have been the cord with a simple knot, the knot being intended to keep the cord from ravelling-out. the tassel is undoubtedly of great antiquity. the reliefs found in khorsabad, niniveh, and elsewhere, show that the assyrians were great admirers of such kinds of trimming. and, although such a lavish use does not occur again; there would probably be little difficulty in finding examples of tassels from all periods of art not only form but also colour-contributes to the effect of tassels, so that the examples in our plate really only give half the eftect. an exhaustive study of trimmings, by jacob falke, will be found in teirich's "blatter fur kunstgowerbe" . plate . the tassel. . french lady's girdle, th century, (viollet-le-duc) — . tassels, holbein, (teirich). . tassels, turkish harness, th century, united collections, carlsruhe. . tassel, old standard, united collections, carlsruhe. . tassel, tunisian pistol, united collections, carlsruhe. . leather tassel, lady's bag, german renascence. — . modern tassels, by aug. t pfer, (gewerbehalle). . modern tassel, by a, seder, munich. the fringe, and the valence. (plate .) if, at the end of a-piece of material, the weft-threads (parallel to the end) be drawn-out, the remaining warp-threads will form a simple fringe. if we give the end greater security, by knotting or tieing the threads together in tufts, we get the ordinary fringe. the fringe, however, is not always made of the material; it is ofted manufactured independently, and sewed-on to the edge of the material. in this case the fringe is combined with a woven heading-band (gimp). the tassel. plate . c the fringe, the valence, and the lace border. richer types of fringes may be produced either by variety of the edge, so that tufts of unequal lengths form rhythmically alternating groups (fig. ), or by using several thicknesses of fringe, lying one behind the other, (fig. ). the fringe is always applied long, when a pendant termination is required. in other cases as, for example, whero the fringed ma- terial is to lie horizontally, like small table-covers, napkins, &&, it is advisable to keep the fringe short. fringes have been in use from the very earliest periods; but it is again the orientals, and especially the assyrians, who show a pre- ference for this form. fringes occur perpetually in various national costumes, and in the toilet of our modern ladies. the renascence adopted the fringe as a trimming for furniture, and specially for chairs; although not always with true artistic feeling. the valence is a hanging textile termination; the lower edge is ornamentally cut, and is often ornamented with cords, tassels, em- broidery, &o. the upper edge of the valence is generally fixed to a moulding. valences occur as the interior furnishing of windows, on four-post beds, baldachins, canopies, tents, marquees, &c.; of late years, they have been used on awnings, and outside-blinds. plate - the valence. . tomb of the incas, ancon, peru, united collections, carlsruhe. . indian-mexican pouch, united collections, carlsruhe. . . egyptian, (ebers). . renascence, (storck). . mediaeval maniple, (teirich). . turkish saddle-cloth, , united collections, carlsruhe. . renascence, silver. — . modern designs, by prignot. the lace border. (plate .). of all products of the textile art, lace is the most interesting. there is something poetical about it, like flowers. the combination of the conventional treatment with those accidental features which hand-work confers upon the delicate, light material, gives them a peculiar charm. who invented lace manufacture, and in what year, cannot now be determined. lace is one of those things which the renascence has handed down to us without having inherited it from the antique. the stimulus, to the invention of lace and the basis of its manufacture, is probably to be found in tho textile hand-work of the middle agps, such as was practised, particularly in convents, for ecclesiiisfical purposes. the fringe, and the valence. plate . . »wld the lace border. ( lace belongs in most eases to the free-ornaments. more rarely it is manufactured as an insertion, with the character of a ribbon, or for independent use as a shawl or wrap. compared with fringe, the applications of lace are freer and more varied, and by no means con fined to the character of a pendant termination. the reader may be assumed to be acquainted with the various uses of lace. if we exclude the allied crochet-work as not strictly belonging to this section, we shall find that the manufacture of lace may be divided into two groups: ( ) sewed or point lace; and ( } bobbin or pillow lace. the former method has chiefly been practised in italy, spain, ireland, and france; the latter in england, france, the nether- lands, schleswig, switzerland,-and saxony. the chief centres of the lace industry were and to some extent still are: venice, genoa, milan, ragusa, devonshire, buckinghamshire, ireland, alencon, valenciennes, brussels, mechlin, binche, tondern, annaberg, &c. as in other branches, the cheap machine-made article has nowa- days reduced the manufacture of the dearer but far more valuable hand-made lace to very modest limits. see reports on lace, by alan s. cole (department of science and art). among the numerous kinds of lace for which no generally re- cognised terminology as yet exists, we have selected some, principally of older date, among which the best patterns are to be found: point coupe (punto tagliato). the linen ground is out-out and the edges worked with th« needle. point tire (punto a maglia quadra). single compartments of a quadrangular knotted or woven net are filled-up. point tir (punto tirato). the threads of the linen fabric are partially pulled-out, the others connected together and sewed round. point coupe (punto a reticella). groups of threads stretched lengthwise and crosswise like a net, are spun round and connected. point noue (punto a groppo). produced by plaiting and knotting the threads. point lace. the threads are sewed together, following the pattern, and joined together by "brides". this is almost the only kind of lace which can now be found on ladies' work-tables. plate . the lace border. . venetian guipure, old pattern-book. . point noue, end of the th century. — . old, point — . modern, pillow, old patterns. . modern, knotted, with fringe, (macrame lace). bfoytr, handbook of ornament. a supports. all those elements of ornamental art which express the idea of supporting or bearing, are here gathered into a special group to which is given the name "supports". supports, in tho strict sense of the word, are piers or columns. but it does not fall within the scope of this work to treat these forms from the architectural point of view, or to enter into the details and proportions of the so-called "orders of architecture". all that is required on this point may be gained from the works of architectural specialists: botticher, tektonik der hellenen; mauch and lohde, die architeklonischen ordnungen; r. phen spiers, the orders of archi- tecture; vignola; dunn and others. we will therefore disregard the undecorated forms, and discuss only the decorative details of these supports. like a tree which consists of root, trunk, and crown, piers and columns necessarily have a base, a shaft, and a capital. (the doric column is an exception as it has no base.) the natural model for the pier and the column is the trunk of a tree hewn into a cylindrical or prismatic form. the motive of the channellings and flutings of the shaft of a support is to be found in the channels and flutings of endogeneous plants. supports which, like piers and columns, are intended to bear a considerable weight, usually have a strong cylindrical or prismatic structure, generally tapering towards the top; the fundamental forms of the candelabrum, which is meant to bear only an inconsiderable weight, like lamps, &c., are freer, have more variety, and offer a wider field for decoration than the forms of the former group. the candelabrum is also divided into foot, shaft, and crown. the shaft, supports. — the foliated shaft. again, is frequently composed of several distinct parts. the cande- labrum as a whole will receive a more detailed consideration in division iii, (utensils). small pillars, shaped like a pier, column, or candelabrum, nro also used for the construction of balaustrades; in which case they have to support only a rail. the small pillars have thick, compact forms; balausters, on the contrary, are slender bodies of revolution, with great variety in the profile. very peculiar forms of support are the antique trapezophors or uble-legs; the legs of modern furniture bear more resemblance, to balauster pillars. terminus is the name given to supports which widen out in an upward direction like an inverted obelisk, and terminate in a bust or capital. beside the geometrical and plant elements, the human form is also used as a motive of supports. male forms thus used are termed atlanta; and female forms caryatids. the various forms of consoles are included in the group of supports. the foliated shaft. (plate .) we have already mentioned that the plant-world furnishes the motive for the forms of supports. reeds, canes, tree-trunks with knots, &c., were copied in the antique. the mural paintings of pompeii show lofty airy constructions with extremely slender, foliated supports. the bronze candelabra and lampadaria, intended to hold lamps, are often direct imitations of plant stems, while the roman state-candelabra are often decorated- with artificial foliage. later epochs have made little change in this respect; it may be said in general that, as regards delicacy of feeling, and moderation in the application of natural forms, they have seldom reached and still more seldom surpassed the antique models. plate . the foliated shaft. . finial of the choragic monument of lysikrates, athens, (in- tended for the reception of a bronze tripod), greek. . part of the shaft of a roman state-candelabrum, marble, vatican museum, rome. — . supports, mural paintings, pompeii, (jacobsthal). . graeco-italic, lamp-stand, bronze. . upper part of shaft, graeco-italic candelabrum, brondsted collec- tion, (vulliamy). plate . the foliated shaft the kiuted shaft. — the baso. tue fluted shaft. -(plato .) columns, piers, candelabra, and similar supports frequently bavo channelling or flutings. the object of these is to give animation to the smooth shaft, and to emphasize the exprossion of the principle of weight-bearing. this latter is specially true of the chanuelliugs. in tho doric style the flutings are shallow without any interval, only divided from each othor by a sharp edgo, (figs. and ). the ionic and corinthian shafts, havo deopor (lutings (tigs. and ), separated from each other by cts -formod of the untouched surface of the ^haft. the ch;iunellings terminate upwards like small niches, with somicircular or elhptical heads, (fig ). leal-like terminations, like that on fig. are rarer! the termination downwards is similar to those shown on figs. — . the number of cbanncllings on a shaft varies from to on smallor constructions, such as furniture, balausters, &c., the number is reduced; but seldom less than . the cbannellings taper proportionately with the shaft. pilasters are also channelled to match the columns. in strict architecture, rich and composite cbannellings and flutings are rather injurious than otherwise (figs. — ); but on candelabra, and mouldings they often produce a good effect. when applied to the torus and the cavetto: the former (convex) should be decorated by nurls; and the latter (concave) should have flutes. plate . the fluted shaft. — . sections of doric fluting. — . sections of ionic and corinthian fluting. — . construction of the terminations of fluting on cylindrical shafts. — . composite fluting, with sections, and terminations. . part of an antique candelabrum, with tapered fluting. . termination of the fluting, monument of lysikrates, athens. (the construction is clearly indicated on the drawings.) the base. (plate — .) it is unquestionably moro beautiful when something in the hape of a base is interposed between the shaft of a column and the substructure on which it rests, than when, as in the doric stylo, the column rises without any such base. bases suggested by the radical leaves of plants, are common in oriental styles. plate , fig. gives an egyptian example of this kind. decorations of this sort are, however, oftener applied to the lower end of the shaft than plate . the fluted shaft. the base. to the base itself. this natural method of decoration is also met- with on richly decorated examples of roman style, where a row of artificial leaves encircle the shaft, (plate . ). antique bases are composed of a square foundation slab (the plinth); and some mouldings which follow the circular plan of the shaft. the well-known and oft-used attic base, consists, beginning from below, of a plinth, a great torus, fillet, scotia, fillet, upper torus, fillet and apophyge. the last, as a quarter-hollow forms the transition between fillet and shaft. when the plinth is decorated, which is the case only iri very rich examples, the motive is either a band or a scroll. the tori are de- corated with braided work, as shown on plate , the hollow or "scotia" is sometimes decorated with leaves, the smaller tori may be treated as astragals; and so on. plate shows three rich roman examples. others will be found in bbtticher's tektonik der eellenen.. the byzantine and romanesque periods follow the antique in the treatment of bases. the spaces which remain on the upper sur- face of the square plinth are, however, filled up with ornament (plate . , , , ), or with small animal figures, (plate . ). in the later gothic style the torus overlaps the sides of the plinth, which reduces these spaces; the corners of the plinth are also some- times finished as shown on plate . . the gothic period profers geometrical to organic form; and se- cures good effects by a variety of profiles placed high up on com- posite clustered columns, (plate . ) gives an example of this. remark the similarity with the chinese example, fig. , which would seem to have been suggested by a cluster of juxtaposed shafts. the renascence and modern styles resort to direct copying from the antique; but, as a rule, do not use ornamented mouldings. the treatment of the bases of piers and pilasters is usually identical with that of columns; so that there is no necessity for dealing with these separately. plate . the base: roman. . capitoline museum, rome, (de vico). . temple of concord, rome, (de vico). . baptistery of constantino, rome, (vorbilder fiir fabrikanten und handworker). piate . the base: romanesque, &c. . egyptian, temple of tutmes iii, karnak, (raguenct). . chinese, (raguenet). . romanesque, coupled, schwarzacb. — . mediaeval. . romanesque. plate . the base. the base. plate . the base. — the ornamented shaft. . romanesque, st. remy, reims, (raguenet). . romanesque, cistercian monastery, maulbronn. . romanesque, abbey "des dames". caen, (raguenet). . gothic, church, brou-asn, (raguenet). the ornamented shaft. (plates — .) the simplest, most natural and perhaps the most beautiful de- coration of a shaft is fluting, beyond which the antique very seldom goes. where it does: it clothes the stem in naturalistic fashion with plant-forms, (plate . ). in the byzantine, romanesque, and scandinavian styles: we often find the shaft covered with a geometrical network, and ornamented in a corresponding style, (plate . — ). the gothic style prefers to leave the slender shafts smooth. the renascence is not satisfied with the simple flute especially on small architectural work like altars, monuments, &c. the craving to give the column a decoration commensurate with that of the other parts of the architecture became irresistible. it is raised on a pedestal; the shaft is banded, being divided into parts by projecting cinctures, generally two, the lower at about one-third, the upper at about two- thirds of the height on the lower part are suspended festoons, weapons, trophies, cartouches, &c., the upper part is channelled or decorated with artificial foliage (plate . ); finally, festoons of fruit or drapery are suspended from tho capital. where the columns are not large, especially in furniture, the cylindrical shaft is replaced by tho richer profiling of a more candelabrum- like form, (plate . ). flat ornamentation is also used, as well as plastic decoration, by means of painting, incrustation, or inlaying, (plate . ). all these methods of application are more or less in agreement with the object and principle of construction of the column, but the same cannot be said of the renascence and the following styles of the decadence, which build up their columns of large and small drums, alternately ornamented and plain, or even give the shaft a spiral twist and decorate it with spiral flutings. plate . the decorated shaft. . italian renascence, tomb in sta. maria del popolo, rome, by sansovino. . romanesque. . shaft, church, tournus, (ragupnet). . roman, marble. . column, with intarsia decoration, german renascence, (hirth). the decorated shaft. plate . plate . the profiled shaft. the ornamented shaft. — the capital. plate . the profiled shaft. . candelabrum-like column, tester-bed, french renascence. . lower part of a column, mayence cathedral. . lower part of column, palais du commerce, lyons, (raguenet). . column, diploma, modern. . column,. modern, (gerlach). the capital. (plates — .) the upper termination of the column is the capital. the capital forms the transition from the supporting shaft to the superincumbent weight. this transition may assume either geometrical or organio forms. very frequently both systems are combined; so that, strictly speaking, we can only say that one system or the other predominates. the egyptian -capital is suggested by the cinctured bundle of papyrus stems with buds (plate . , ), or with opened papyrus or lotus flowers, (plate . , ). abnormal capitals are found in the old persian style. plate . , gives an example from persepolis, composed of the fore-parts of bulls. as examples of oriental forms: two moorish capitals from the alhambra in granada are given on figs. and of the same plate. antique art adopts three general types of capitals: doric, ionio and corinthian. the doric capital consists of the abacus, which is square in plan, and the echinos, which is circular. the transition to the shaft is effec- ted by hollow mouldings and astragals. the graeco-doric capital was painted. v^here the sides of the abacus are decorated: a fret pattern is employed (plate . ). the echinos is a member of conflict, and is ornamented accordingly. in the roman and renascence styles plastic ornamentation takes the place of painting. the band of leaves becomes an egg-and-dart ornament (plate . }. leaves pointing upward are sometimes used (plate . ). at the top of the abacus a small moulding is used. a necking, generally decorated with rosettes, is interposed between capital and shaft. similar rosettes decorate the spaces on tho under sido of the abacus (plate . — ). the ionic capital replaces the square abacus by a scroll rolled- in on both sides, in great volutes. tho intervals, between the egg band and the scroll, are marked by palmettos. a neck may bo'added as in the doric capital, and it is frequently decorated with a pal- metto ornament (plate . — ). the side view of the scroll shows plain profilings as on plato . , decorated with leavos or scales in the richer examples. the. ionic capital has two faces, and iiog tbo capital. two sides. for this reason it is of only limited application, as, when the capital is applied to the corner colnmn of two adjacent sides of a building, it is impossible to avoid a bad effect from the two reentering volutes on the inner faces. the fundamental form of the corinthian capital is the calix. the decoration may be designed on two methods. firstly a row of leaves, or two rows arranged alternately one above the other, clothe the lower cylindrical part of the capital, and plain broad waterleaves form the transition to the square abacus. to this class belongs the capital of the tower of the winds in athens, and a capital found on the island of melos, which is shown on plate . . or, secondly: volutes rise from the rows of leaves and unite in pairs under the corners of the abacus, which are then extended, so that the sides are rendered concave in plan. the centre of each sides of the abacus is decorated with a palmette or rosette (plate . — ). the fusion of the ionic and corinthian capitals produced the composite capital; whose appearance is more interesting than beautiful' (plate . ). early christian, and, to a certain extent, byzantine and roma- nesque art, models the forms of capital on those of the antique. the corinthian capital is the one mostly followed. the details are made correspondingly simpler and ruder (plate . — ). but along side of these reminiscences of the antique, new and independent forms appear. the antagonism between the cylindrical under part and the square upper termination is adjusted by geometrical construc- tions. thus originated the cushion and the trapeziform capital. the cushion capital is specifically romanesque. a half sphere is cut by planes below and on the four sides. its simplest form is given on plate . . the decoration is sometimes geometrical (plate . and ), and sometimes contains foliage and figures (plate . ). tire double-cushion capital is a variant of the cushion capital (plate . ). the trapeziform capital is specifically byzantine. in this style: the cylindrical shaft is continued to the square abacus, which causes each side of the capital to assume a trapeziform shape (plate . ). very often these capitals are richly decorated with figures. the arrangement of clustered-shafts, so popular in the middle ages, led to the coupled-capital, which appears sometimes as con- joined capitals (plate . ), and sometimes as the juxtaposition of two ordinary capitals with a conjoined abacus. in the gothic style, particularly in its later period, the abacus becomes octagonal. crocket-like knots of leaves are loosely attached to the calix-formed core. the vigourous projections of these leaf ornaments give the capital the appearance of an inverted bell (bell capitals, plate . — ). the renascence adopts the doric and ionic capitals, and more the capital. usually the corinthian capital directly borrowed from the antique; but the forms become freer and more taped; and, compared with the overcharged roman examples, simpler. the volutes at the comers develope into independent forms, and are often replaced by dolphins, cornucopias, and other fantastic forms, scattered instances of which may, however, be found even in the antique. modern architecture, like the renascence, also follows these traditions. plate . toe capital. . ancient persian, persepolis. . egyptian, kdm-ombo. . , philae. . , memnonium thebes. . . luxor, (owen jones). — . moorish capitals, aihambra, hall of the two sisters, (raguenet). " . graeco-doric. . roman-doric, thermae of diocletian, (mauch and lohde). . doric, italian renascence, by barozzi da vignola. plate . the capital. . graeco-ionic, (jacobsthal). . tonic, bassae, (cockerell). . ionic, pompeii. . roman-ionic, (musterornamente). . graeco-ionic, ercchtheum, athens. . ionic, louvre, paris. . antique corinthian, found in melos, (vorbilder fur fabrikanten und handwerker). . greek-corinthian, monument of lysikrates, athens. .' roman-corinthian, palaces of the emperors rome. . roman composite, louvre, paris. plate . tite capital. . romanesque cushion-capital, st. gereon, cologne, (otte). . « ' • i the abbey church, laach, (otte). . byzantine, sta. sofia, constantinople. . romanesque double-cushion-capital, rosheim church, xi. cen- tury. . romanesque double-cushion-capital. . romanesque cushion-capital, freiburg. — . romanesque, former cloisters of the church, schw.irzncb. . romanesque coupled-cupital. . romanesque. i'late the capita!. supports. plate . the capital. the capital. plate . * plate . the pilaster panel. the capital. — the pilaster panel. . romanesque cushion-capital, monastery, lippoldsberg. — . late gothic, triforium of the choir, minster freiburg. plate . the capital. . renascence, drawing by holbein, (guicbard). — . renascence, designs by heinrich voigtherr, (hirth). . composite, italian. . renascence, palazzo scrofa, ferrara, italian. . renascence, tomb in sta. maria del popolo, rome, by san- so vino. . renascence, italian, palazzo zorzi, venice. . modern, municipal baths, carlsruhe, architect durm. . modern french, vaudeville theatre, paris, architect magne. the pilaster panel. (plate .) in many cases the pilaster or wall-pier shaft is devoid of orna- ment. unlike the column, the pilaster does not, as a rule, taper up- wards; and if the pilaster is ornamented with fluting the tapering is never permissible. the pilaster frequently has cinctures, generally two, the lower at j , the upper at j/s of its height. the ornamental decoration, when present, takes the form of an elongated, sunk panel bordered by a moulding. the ornamentation may be of three kinds: firstly: an ascending plant motive may be used, rising symmetrically or in the form of a wavy line from calices, vases, &c., animal and human figures being not infrequent accessories; secondly, the decora- tion may consist of festoons of flowers, fruits, trophies, shields, &c., varied by knots and ribbons, the points of suspension being rosettes, rings, lion beads, &c.; thirdly, the panel may be decorated with flat strapwork, as in the elizabethan manner. of these three kinds of decoration the first is the most used; and the most suitable. few antique examples have come down to us; the middle ages make scarcely any use of the pilaster; but the renascence is much richer in such exampbs. stalls, altars, sepulchral-monuments are scarcely to be found without pilasters. plate offers a small selection from the copious material; all the panels show the first of the three kinds of decoration. plate . the pilaster panel . italian renascence. — . italian renascence, sta. maria dei miracoli, venice. — . italian renascence, by benedetto da majano. — . modern panels, in the style of the italian renascence. the pilaster capital. the pilaster capital. (plates — .) generally speaking, the structure of the capital of the pilaster follows that of the column; and, to a certain extent, translates the forms of the latter from the round to the flat. this observation is true in the renascence period; but not in the antique. in pilaster-capitals in the doric style one or more leaf or egg- and-dart mouldings run under the abacus, and are covered at the corners with palmettos or leaves. beneath this proper part of the capital a neck more or less high is usually found, decorated with rosettes or with other ornaments (plate . ). on modern capitals of this class the neck may even be fluted (plate . ); not infre- quently the centre of the capital is still further decorated by the addition of masks, symbols, &c. (plate . and ). while the renascence adopted the form of the ionic capital with scarcely any change for its pilasters (plate . ), the antique possessed a special form of pilaster capital of this order (plate . ). the most numerous, varied and beautiful capitals of pilasters are in the corinthian order. the profile and general arrangement are the same as with the columns; generally, however, the pilaster is broader in proportion to its height. the lower part is encircled by artificial leaves which sometimes dwindle to the two corner leaves supporting the volutes. the volutes are of the most varied descrip- tions, sometimes replaced by cornucopias, dolphins, chimeras, and other figures (plates . and . ). leaf-ornaments, vases, garlands, calices of flowers, &c., are arranged at the centres (plate . — ), also masks (plate , , and ). neckings are rare on corinthian capitals (plate . ). the egg-and-dart mouldings, which run along the bottom of antique examples (plate . — ), are reminiscences of the doric style, so that these forms may also be regarded as a kind of transition capital. plate . the pilaster capital. . greek-doric anta, erechtheum, athens. . greek-ionic anta. . greek-corinthian. — . roman-corinthian, (bstticher). . roman-corinthian, pantheon, rome. . roman-corinthian, temple of mars ultor, rome, (de vico). plate . the pilaster capital. . corinthian, italian renascence, court of the scala dei giganti, venice, (wiener bauhiitte). the pilaster capital. plate . plate . thc pilaster capital. the pilaster capital. plate . the pilaster capital — the candelabra base. . corinthian, italian renascence, sta. maria dei miracoli, venice. . corinthian, italian renascence, certosa, florence. . corinthian, italian renascence, scuola di san marco, venice, by pietro lombardo. — . corinthian, italian renascence, chapel of the palazzo vecchio, florence, (musterornamente). corinthian, italian renascence. . corinthian, french renascence', tomb of louis xh, st. denis. plate . the pilaster capital. . corinthian, italian renascence, portal of san michele, venice. — . corinthian, italian renascence, palace of the doges, venice. . ionic, french renascence, (lievre). . wronght-iron, castle at athis-mons, french, th century. . wrougbt-iron, by jean benin, french, th century, (raguenet). . modern doric, architects kayser and v. grossheim. . modern doric, new opera house, paris, architect gamier. . modern ionic, rue dieu, paris, architect sedille. . modern corinthian, atelier of a painter, paris, sculptor bloche. , the candelabrum foot. (plate .) for lighting, the candelabrum played an important part in the domestic and religious life of the ancients. in the house, they mostly employed slender, delicate bronze candelebra; and for religion, the great state-candelabra of marble. the candelabrum, like the column, consists of three parts: the base, the shaft, and the capital. to afford the necessary steadiness, the base of the candelabrum is planned on a comparatively large scale, and divided into three legs, which stretch-out, towards the points of an equilateral triangle. for the foot, the claw of an animal, and in particular the claw of the lion, is used. not infrequently the claws rest on balls or discs (plate . ). the transition to the shaft is designed with a double calix, the upper leaves of which rise and encircle the shaft, and the lower leaves descend and mask the junction of the three legs (plate . and ). a delicate anthemion may be perceived between each pair of feet on richer examples (plate . and ). in exceptional cases the leg appears to grow from the mouth of an animal (plate . ). occasionally a circular, profiled and decorated disc is used instead of the double calyx and anthemion. sometimes, too, the shaft is prolonged downwards beneath the disc in the form of a knob, but does not touch the ground. the candelabrum base, & shaft it is obvious that the delicate forms and the division into legs, whicn was so suitable for a material like bronze, could not be trans- ferred directly to the construction in marble; but reminiscences of it may be seen in the retention of the triangular ground-plan, the re- duced claws, the double calyx, &c. (plate . ). plate . the candelabrum babe. . antique, bronze, museum, naples, (botticher). . „ „ (betticher). . „ „ studj publici, florence, (weissbach and lotter- moser). — . antique, bronze, musoum, naples. — . legs from antique candelabra: the former found in the ruins of paestum; the other in the museum, naples. . roman, state-candelabrum. . renascence candelabrum, collection of drawings, uffizi, florence. the candelabrum shaft. (plate .) the decoration of the shaft of the antique bronze domestio candelabrum is simple; and consists of flutings or channellings, some- times of naturalistic buds and leaves. far richer ia the ornamentation of the antique state-candelab- rum. it is divided into zones (plate . ), or the shaft swells and diminishes alternately, giving a richer profile (plate . ). smooth 'and fluted parts with contrast with foliage and figure; and the ascending decoration is varied by trophies and festoons. the effect depends on the propriety of the division. the repetition of similar masses or similar forms becomes tedious. the antique and also the renascence, particularly in italy, has transmitted to us a number of standard forms of candelabra; of which a few examples are reproduced plate . plate . the candelabrum shaft. . roman, marble. . roman, marble. . antique, (bstticher). . mast-socket, piazza of s. mark, venice, bronze, italian renas- cence. . candelabrum-like foot of a holy water-stoup, pisa cathedral, italian renascence. . italian renascence, badia near florence. hate . the candelabrum base. the candelabrum shaft. plate . the candelabrum capital. — the balauster. the candelabrum capital. (plate .) the capital of a candelabrum has a plate or cup-like form, according as it is destined to receive a lamp, or a candle. the tops of the antique bronze candelabra, as a rule, are profiled like the so-called krater (figs. — ). the profiles, and ornamentation already given, may be re- garded as standards. the insertion of real capitals, or of figures, as bearers (fig. ) is rarer. the marble candelabra of the antique usually terminate in a plate or table (fig. ); and this is also the case with the renascence candelabra intended to receive candles. these were not placed in a cylindrical socket hut stuck on a co- nical pricket. on the decoration of candelabra the reader may compare the plates dealing with this subject in division iii, (group of utensils). plate . the candelabrum capital. — . antique, museum, naples. . roman. . renascence, drawing in the uffizi, florence. the balauster. (plate .) balansters are small squat columns of circular or square plan. sometimes they are only symmetrical around their axis, sometimes however they are also symmetrical in an upward and downward direc- tion. in most cases their construction is that of the candelabrum. they may be divided into base, shaft, and capital. ranged side-by-side in a row, balausters are employed by the renascence and modern art in parapets, balconies, attics, and stair- cases. when the balausters are placed on a stair-case: the bases and capitals are either slanting, or the. horizontals of the balausters follow the slanting lines of the stair-case. the latter method was adopted in the decadence of the renascence, but is unjustifiable; and can, in any case, only be adopted with balausters of a square or oblong plan. a rich variety may be obtained by the use of square and cylindrical forms in the same balauster (fig. ). the balauster is occasionally used as a support for stalls, and on furniture. ra- guenet's "documents et materiaux" contains a large number of ba- lausters; from which we have selected some examples. the candelabium capital. plate the h.ilaustor. — the tei minus. plate . the balausteii. . square plan, itahan renascence, sta. maria della salute, venice . a system of squaro balauslcrs, palazzo pesaro, venice. . circular plan, modern italian. . wood, italian renascence,, stalls in sta. maria novella, flo- rence. . modern french, architect rout, paris. — . square wooden, (bethke: "der decorative holzbauer"). — . modern, terracotta. tiik terminus. (plate .) the terminus is a pilaster-like support, the fundamental form of which is characterized by tape-ring downwards in a manner re- calling an inverted obelisk. the name is derived from the fact that m miliar constructions wore usod in the antique as milestones and to mark the terminations of fields, &c. the terminus consists of the profiled base, not infrequontly supported on a special pedestal (figs. and ); the shaft tapering downwards and usually ornamented with festoons (figs. , , , ); and the capital, which is often re- placed by a bust or half-figure (figs. ^ , ). in this latter case, it assumes the appearance of a caryatid; and, as the bust is that of hermes (the god of letters), this application is often termed a "hermes". standing isolatod, it servos as a pedestal for busts and lamps, as a post for railings, and in gardens and terraces. the last was exceedingly popular iu tho rococo period. joined to the wall, the terminus often takes the place of tho pilaster. this is especially true of the furniture and small architectural constructions of the renascence period. it is also not uncommon on utensils, e. g. tri pods, handles of pokers, seals, &e. plate . the terminus. . upper part, antique, silver treasure of hildesheim, berlin museum, (obviously from a roman tripod). . stone terminns bust, italian renascence, villa massimi, rome, (raguenet). . stone terminus bust, german renascence, mantel-piece, town- hall, lubeck. . stone terminus bust, german renascence, otto heinrich build- ing, heidelberg castle. . stone terminus bust, german renascence, monument, church of the castle, pforzheim. "meyer. rin'lbook of ornament plate . the termiuns. the terminus. — the parapet — the railing post. — . wooden terminus, renascence. . small terminus figure, german renascence, national museum, munich. . terminus with mask, modern chimney-piece, (gewerbehalle). the parafet. (plate ho.) besides the parapets which are formed by rows of balausters, there are others which are arrangements of pierced or perforated tsone or wood, and cast or wrought iron. the gothic style prefers tracery, the renascence prefers scrolls for stone parapets (figs. and s). parapets of perforated wood, which are typical of swiss architecture, are composed of strips of boards, with shapes more or less rich, care being taken that the intervening spaces also form pleasing shapes. to construct parapets in the form of bi-axial trellises, was a popular custom of the renaseence; and it has continued so to the present day. but the function of the supports is only fully shown when the pattern has an upward direction. this, however, does not ex- clude the use of other treatments, e. g. panels. raguenet has nume- rous examples. plate . the parapet. . modern gothic, stone, viollet-le-duc, (raguenet). . modern gothic, stoue, viollet-le-duc, castle of pierrefonds, (raguenet). . stone, german renascence, *dagobert tower, new castle, baden- baden. — . trellis, schinkel, (vorb. f. fabr. u. handw). . modern french, hotel mirabeau, paris, architect magne, (raguenet). . trellis, barocco, wrought-iron, french. railing post. (plate .) staircase railings, are formed of rows of upright posts. these are of slender, delicate form; and take the place of the stouter balauster. the usual materials for balausters are stone, terracotta, and wood; the railings, on the other hand, are of metal, or, in their simpler forms, of wood. in the last decades, cast-iron was the ma- * supports. plate ho. the parapet. the bailing post. — the furniture leg. terial most often used; but lately a return has been made to the more plastic wrought-iron. the ornamentation depends on the material selected. > wrought - iron posts are decorated with scrolls and tendrils, while cast - iron uprights are decorated in bai - relief. if the bailing-post has to stand on a horizontal plane, it is ad- visable to construct the foot in the manner ~ shown in figs. , , and ; if it is to be affixed to the sides of the treads of a staircase, arrangements similar to those in figs. , , and , are necessary. where the upper end has to support the hand-rail, independent terminations, like figs. and , may be adopted. spherical head may be applied to all angles (fig. ). plate . the railing post. . modern post, cast-metal, architect v. leins, stuttgart, (ge- werbehalle). . modern post, cast-metal, architect v. hoven, frankfurt, (ge- werbehalle). . modern post, wrought-iron, (gewerbehalle). . „ „ cast-metal. . „ „ architects gropius and schmieden. . plain wooden post. — . modern posts, cast-metal, architect v. hoven, frankfurt the furniture leg. (plate .) the legs of wood furniture may be divided into two classes according to their height. tables and chairs have high legs; low legs or feet serve as supports for all kinds of cabinet and box-like articles. the general plan is that of a balauster-like body of revolution as turned on the lathe. angular forms, however, are also used. high legs are frequently decorated with carved ornaments; low legs are usually left plain; and this would seem to be in accordance with their character. metal feet are sometimes used for small pieces of furniture like caskets. where the legs have to stand on the floor: it is advisable to taper them downwards (figs. — ); where they have to stand on raised platforms and seldom require to be moved: it is better to furnish them with a pedestal (fig. ). it has lately become fashion- able to apply metal casters to pianos, heavy chairs, couches, &c. tho furniture leg. — the trapczophorou. plate . tin: fuknitdre lko. . mojorn. . modurn. . modern. - . modern. — . various old designs. toe trapezopqoron. (plates — .) "trapezophoron" is tho n.imo given to the support of the antique table. they wore usually of marble, tho top itself was of wood or stone, sometimes ornamented with mosaic. we may distinguish two principal classes of antique tables: the circular table with three logs (compare plate . ); and tho oblong table, resting on two end-supports (compare . and . ). the lower part, of tho support of the round table, consists of a great leg which generally passes into a foliated calyx with- a small hoad of a lion, lynx, panther, or other animal growing out of it ( . — ). the heads are sometimes human ( - . ) or human half-figures, such as the genius bearing a bowl on l'late . — . in the early period of antique art we llnd forms of more architectonic character like plate , fig . the end-support for the oblong table is a symmetrical duplication of tho motive of the single leg already men- tioned, with the addition of wings, and with the space between the animal forms filled either by figuros or ornaments (plate . — and . ). very striking in both classes of support is the differ- «nco in scale of the various elements (a phenomenon which also appears elsewhere in roman art). on antique table-legs the reader may also consult division iii, (furniture). plate . the trapezophoron. . three-legged table, roman, legs of marble, table-top of mosaic. — . front and side view of the support of a roman table, found in the atrium of the house of cornelius rufus in pompeii, (fragments de l'architecture). . support of antique table. — . marble support of roman table, lynx hoad and claw, museum, naples. — . marble support of roman table, panther head and claw, bri- tish museum. — . marble support of roman table, lion head and claw, vatican, rome. the trapezophoron. plate supports. plate the trapezophoron. the trapezopboron. — the console. plate . the trapezophorox. . marble support of antique table, museum, naples (judging lrom the symbolism of the ornamentation, tho leg is probably from a table sacred to zeus), (l'art pour tous). — . front and side view of a small roman table-support, marble, naples museum, panther claw, eros garbed with the nebris. . roman table-support, marble, british museum. . „ „ „ , head of hercules and lion claw, vatican. . antique support, marblo, (vulliamy). the console. (plates — .) the form of the console is extremely varied; as aro its uses and applications. it is determined by the function, and the material of which it is made, as well as by the style of tho period. architectural members of the character of consoles are early found in the chinese and indian, as also in the assyrian stylo; but in the egyptian style they are wanting. volute consoles, very beautifully developod, -are found sporadi- cally in the greek style; but the roman stylo was the first to mako an extensive use of these forms. the decorated ends of beams are probably to be regarded as the original model for consoles. the s-shaped double volute, with a large and a small spiral, is the standard form. in this console, the line of construction and the space for the actual decoration are giveu in the side-view, while tho front, which is subordinate, is ornamented by scale motives, and leaves, which adapt themselves in graceful curves to the standard forms. , when the console is used in the console-band of a cornice, or as the bracket of-a balcony, its attitude is recumbent. when it sup- ports the cornices of doors and windows, its attitude is erect. no other apphcation is known in the antique. a beautiful example occurs on the north door of the erechtheum at athens (plate . — ). some examples of recumbent consoles, of roman style, are given in figs. — , of the samo plate. the example — , of the late roman epoch, shows decorative accessories of swans. the bend of the curve of the volute here departs from the normal example, and approaches a more convex curve, which is demanded by tho static calculation for these supports. the early christian and romanesque art adopted coarse copies of the antique, and also created new ones suited to the new require- ments. thus early, we find those modillion forms which become typical for the wooden architecture of the middle ages, being chiefly the console. used beneath mouldings, and in corners of doors between the jambs and the lintel. the example on plate . may be taken as representative of this kind of support. another class of supports exhibits a central core', tapered downwards, like pendants with a polygonal or round plan (plate . and ). this latter form is also used in gothic art as a bracket for the statues of the saints, which were applied to piers and the arches of portals. the renascense remodels the last-named console in its own way, but recurs by preference to the antique form (plate . ), some- times reversing the volutes (plate . — ), and giving the front a richer and more independent ornamentation (plate . ). the combination of several smaller consoles to form a composite - con- sole, is shown on plate . fig. . just as the pendant-consoles of the gothic style imitate the calyx capital, so too does the rena- scense remodel the doric, ionic, and corinthian capitals for consoles (plate . — ). in wood architecture, we meet with consoles which have the form of richly-decorated struts (plate . ). the barocco style, which followed the renascence, also made essential additions to the richness of the forms. the strict line of the volute is abandoned and frequently broken by straight lines (plate . — ). the console is shaped in front-view like a pen- dant triangle, or typographical tail-piece (plate . and ). an- other invention of this period is the triglyph-console (plate . ). the rococo period abandons the traditional standards, and sacri- fices construction to picturesque license. shell-work, and unsymme- trical scrolls, serve as supports. modern art recasts the elements of former styles, without adding anything essentially new, unless we regard as a novelty the custom of placing busts, clocks, and knicknacks, on independent consoles which are used as brackets. finally: we may mention that in almost every style, consoles in the various forms have been used as the keystones of door and window lintels, in which case they are, generally speaking, not supports, as they have nothing to support it should be considered inadmissible to apply distorted consoles i. e. those which have vertical sides though they are on the raking sofits of pediments, as was done in the late roman period, and in imitation thereof by the renascence in some examples. examples, of all periods, will be found in raguenet's work; and an exhaustive essay on the console by dr. p. p. krell in the gt- werbehalle, , no. . plate . the console. — . front and side view, greek, north door, erechtheum, athens. — . front and side view, roman, vatioan. supports. supports. plate . the console. the console. plate . plate . the bracket. the console. — the bracket. — . roman, front and side view, temple of jupiter stator, rome vatican. — . roman, front and side view, vatican. plate . the console. — .- renascenee, side views, vatican. . renascence, hotel d assezat, toulouse, (raguenet). . renascence, wooden, french, hotel d'assezet, toulouse, (ha guenet). . renascence, istrian limestone, venetian, hamburg, museum. . renascence, marble, italian, sta. maria de' miracoli, venice, (gropius). — . modern, french, architect rous, paris. . „ „ „ n n . mediaeval, church, athis, france. plate the console. . romanesque, noyon cathodral, th century, (raguenet). . gothic, st. pierre sous vezelay, (gewerbehalle). . renascence, french, castle, blois. . — . renascence, german, new castle, baden-baden, (gmelin). . renascence, german, heidelberg castle. . renascence, triglyph-console, late french. . modern, french, library, louvre, architect lefucl, (raguenet). . modern, french, (raguenet). . modern, french, new casino, lyons, architect porte, (raguenet). the bracket. (plate .) a special class of supports is formed by those wrought-iron bearers which the middle ages, the renascence, and modern times, have produced in the shape of brackets. the uses of brackets are very various, e. g. in supporting shop-signs, conduit-pipes, gargoyles, candles, lamps, hats, coats, &c. in form, they vary with the style and richness of the work manship. square, hat and round iron, enriched by chasing and other methods of decoration, are used. tboy are frequently fastened to the wall by the aid of ribbon like strips of metal, which mny themselves be decorated with scrolls and curls. the plato shows a number of such supports, of ancient and mo- dern date, destinod for a variety of purposes. mrirnr, handbook of omawonl l the bracket. — the caryatid, and the auante. plate . the bracket. — . part of reading-desk, . benedetto, near mantua, italian re- nascence, (gewerbehalle). . wrought-iron, sign, regensburg, german renascence, (mustcr- ornamente). . wrought-iron bearer of conduit-pipe, kloster lichtenthal near baden, german renascence, (gmelin). . wrought-iron bearer of water-stoup, sepulchral cross in ceme- tery, kircbzarten, german renascence, (schauinsknd). — . wrought-iron supports, for gargoyles, german renascence. . wrought-iron, sign, modern, architect crecelius, mainz. . modern wrought-iron bracket, (badische gewerbezeitung). the caryatid, and the atlante. (plates and .) the freest and the richest motive for supports, is the human figure. as early as egyptian and persian architecture, we find human figures as bearers of beams and roofs. the greek and roman styles also make use of this motive. the modern names for such supports are derived from the antique. accord- ing to greek mythology, atlas supports the vault of heaven at the ends of tho earth. hence is derived the name "atlantes" for these male supporters. they are also sometimes termed "telamons". the name "caryatids", for female supporting figures, is derived from the town of carysa in the peloponnesus. according to another version the caryatids are imitations of the virgins who danced in the temple at carya at the feast of diana. according to vitruvius, their intro- duction into architecture is owing to the fact that ladies of caryae, as a punishment for the support they rendered to the persians, were carried into captivity and compelled to serve as carriers of burdens. the caryatids are termed "canephorae" (basket bearers), when capitals in shape like a basket are interposed between their heads and the superincumbent burden. among well-known examples in the antique are the atlantes in the temple of jupiter at agrigentum, and the caryatids of the erechtheum at athens. the middle ages made little use of atlantes and caryatids; the renascence and the following stylos, on the contrary, used them freely. atlantes and caryatids occur isolated, and connected with walls; and in both high and bas-relief. sometimes the whole length of the figure is employed, sometimes only the upper half in conjunction with a console (plate . — ), or with terminus-like bases (plate . — ). composite bearers in the form of double caryatids are also a popular motive, as shown by the example on plate , from the louvre at paris. supports. plate . the caryatid, ac. the caryatid, the atlanta, ac. plate . the caryattd, the atlante, &c. . greek caryatid, erechtheum, athens, (vorbilder fur fabrikanteo und handwerker). . antique caryatid, villa mattei, after piranesi, (vorbilder fur fabrikanten und handwerker). modern french atlante, house in paris, sculptor caille, (ra- guenet). — modern, front and side views of half-figure consoles, ziegler and weber, carlsrnhe. plate . the caryattd, &c . modern, double caryatid, louvre, paris, (baldus). — modern, caryatids, conservatoire des arts et mitiers, paris, sculptor e. robert, (raguenet). — . modern, caryatids, director c. hammer, nuremberg. — . modern, caryatids, director c. hammer, nuremberg. d. enclosed ornament. (panels.) that method of treatment, which has for its object to decorate a plane surface, and to cover it with ornament, c., by means of painting, inlaying, engraving, etching, &c., we term flat decoration. this falls into two classes. firstly the ornament may be de- signed for a definite, bounded space, such as an oblong, according to artistic rules, so that it fits exactly into this space alone: in which case it is a discontinuous or "panel" ornament or, secondly, the ornament may extend itself in every direction, repeating its details without regard to any definite boundary: in which case it is a con tinuous or "diaper" ornament, such as a wall-paper turning our attention first to discontinuous or tand-ornament. we shall find, in addition to objects whose boundaries are arbitrary and to be fixod at will, that we have principally to consider the following shapes: the squaro, the other regular polygons, the circle, tho oblong, the ellipse, the lunette, the various forms of the span- rail, the lozenge and the triangle. geometrical, natural, and artificial elements, either singly or combined, are used. the character of the ornament may be natura hstic, or it may be artificial, and adapted to some pre-arranged leading-lines of the shape. this book does not. treat of examples of the former character those of the latter character, i. e. artificial ornament, will dopend on the attitude of the panel with regard to the horizon. enclosed ornament. — the square panel. when the panel is inon-axial, i. e. it is symmetrical on both bides of one axis: then the panel-ornament is suitable to a vertical surface. when it is developed regularly in all directions from the centre of the figure, and is symmetrical to two or more axes: then the panel-ornament is suitable to a horizontal surface. the central feature of a horizontal panel is not infrequently emphasized by a rosette ornament, while the decoration of the remaining surface is kept in low-relief. trifling variations, from absolute symmetry and regularity, are often met-with; but they are confined to the details, the impression of symmetry and regularity being preserved in the general effect. these remarks, as well as some further relations arising out of the nature of the subject, we now proceed to illustrate in detail in the following chapters and plates. for the most part we shall con- fine ourselves to the best known and most frequent figures; and shall only offer some few examples of abnormal panels. the square panel. (plates — .) the lines, on which the decoration of the square may naturally be based, are the two diagonals, and the two diameters which join the centre of the opposite sides. these lines cut each-other in a common point, the centre of the shape; and form an eight-rayed star with rays of alternately unequal lengths. they divide the figure into equal spaces, which are usually decorated with repeated orna- ment, and are therefore suitable to the horizontal attitude, (compare plate , figs. — and others). numerically this mode of deco- ration is predominant. barer are the cases in which the angle is once more bisected and the square consequently divided into tri- angles, (compare plate , fig. ). the simplest decoration is the many-rayed star, which is termed the uraniscus, in the coffers oi greek ceilings (comp. plate , fig. ). the centre of the figure is generally accentuated by 'the addition of a rosette, and the direction of growth, like plant-motives, is from the centre outwards (plate , ty. , , , and others); or alternately from the centre outwards a,id inwards (comp. plate . ). slight variations from strict symmetry and regularity are partly caused by the use of the geo- metrical interlaced band (plate . and ), and are partly the deliberate result of artistic freedom of conception (plate . . and . ). the latter example is highly remarkable in this respect; and its originality may serve as a model. the example is also one of the rare cases in .which the ornamentation is symmetrical to the diagonals, and not to the diameters. the square panel. another kind of square decoration is that in which it ia sub- divided into separate spaces, each of which receives an independ;ut ornamentation. plates and of the handbook give a number of such divisions of squares; a similar mode of decoration will be found on plate , fig. , plate , figs. and , and elsewhere. the decoration of the square in an upright attitude, with symmetry to one axis, belongs to the same category as the oblong; and we may therefore refer to what will be said below with reference to this latter figure. square panel are to be found in all styles; we have taken some striking examples from the coffer-ceilings of the antique and the renascence, from the pavement-tiles of the middle ages, and from the metal-work of the renascence and modern times. plate . the square panel. . greek, uraniscus, coffer of ceiling, propylaea, athens. . roman, bas-relief, found during the rectification of the tiber near the farnesina, rome, in , museo tiberino. . assyrian pavement, kouyunjik, (owen jones). — . greek, coffers of ceilings, propylaea, athens. . „ „ „ „ , athens. . „ „ „ „ , parthenon. . roman, mosaic pavement, pompeii, (owen jones). . byzantine, bas-relief, san marco, venice, (owen jones). plate . the square panel . decoration, of a book, th century, library of the duke of devonshire, (racinet). . scandinavian bas-relief, celtic stone cross, churchyard, meigle, angus, (owen jones). . bas-relief, tomb of "pierre is venerable", cluny museum, th century, (l'art pour tous). — mediaeval, tiles, (owen jones, racinet &c.). . tiles, cistercian monastery, bebenhausen. . moorish tiles. . gothic, tiles, bloxham church, england, th century. plate . the square panel land . inlaid work, th or th century, sauvageot collection, (racinet). . arabian mosaic, (prisse d'avennes). . moorish, alhambra, th centuiy . arabian, wood door, th century, (l'art ponr tous). tbe square panel. - the star-shape panel. . renascence, intarsia, gorman (hirth, fonuenschatz). . modern. — . renascence, intarsia, sta. maria gloriosa ai frari, venice, th century, (mnsterornamonte). plate . the sqdare panel. . renascence, motive from a robe in the sacristy, sta. croce, florence, italian. . renascence, tiles, collection of the count d'yvon, (racinet). . renascence, motive after peter flstner, german. . renascence, mosaic flooring, cathedral, spoleto, (jacobstbal; the centre altered). . renascence, intarsia, stalls, certosa near pavia, italian. . renascence, majolica tiles, sta. caterina, siena, italian. . renascence, intarsia, door of the cambio, perugia, by antonio mercatello, , italian. — . renascence, door of the madonna di galliera, bologna, italian, (musterornamente). plate . the square panel. and . wrought-iron, french, th century, (l'art poor tons). and . wrought-iron, german renascence, (hirth, formenschatz). . wrought-iron, oxford, , (l'art pour tous). — wrought-iron, modern. and . wrought-iron, modern, cemetery, carlsruhe. . wrought-iron, by georg klain, salzburg, th century. the star-shape panel. (plate .) the decoration of polygonal stars is generally based on radiat- ing axes. exceptions, in favor of symmetry to one or two axes, are comparatively scarce (fig. ). where thero is no sub-division into independent panels, accord- ing to plates and of the handbook (fig. ): the ornament follows the natural lines of division furnished by the diagonals. in this case the number of the single, similar triangles of division depends on the number of sides (fig. ). decorated star-shaped panels are extremely common in the arabian and moorish styles, whero tho ornament is often of such a character that it would very well suit a simple polygon, and only fills out accidentally (so to speak) the star angles (figs. , and ). the square panel. plate . plate the square panel. the square fane). plate . plate . the square panel. enclosed oenament. the star-shape panel. plate . . the star-shape panel. — the circular panel. plate . the star-shape panel. . mural painting, s. francesco, assisi, (hessemer). . decoration of arabic koran, th century, (prisse d"avenues), i . arabian architecture, (prisse d'avennes). — . arabian ceiling paintings, (prisse d'avennes). . etched ornament, armour, national museum, munich, th cen- tury, (gewerbehalle). — . arabian ceiling paintings, th century, (prisse d'avennes). the circular panel. (plates — .) the circle may be regarded as a polygon of an infinite number of sides. as it is impossible to take this infinite number into account, it is usual, when working on radial axes to divide the circle into , , , , , , , or , similar parts, as indicated in the figures. another principle of frequent application is that of division into zones; each ring-like band being ornamented independently. this principle predominates in the so-called archaic styles, e. g. on etruscan 'and assyrian shields (plate . , , and ). this principle is ex- cellently adapted to the decoration of dishes and plates, the profiling of which naturally points to a zonal division. the centre of the circle, which is sometimes decorated by a rosette, may also be filled by some feature which is symmetrical to one axis or is unsym- metrical (plate . ). the latter mode of decoration has also been adopted, although in comparatively rarer cases, for the decoration of the circle as a whole. geometrical sub-division of the circle, by the insertion of poly- gons, or arcs, is common, not only in gothic tracery, which is specially dependent on these processes, but in every other style (comp. the tracery panels and on plate , and the niello ornaments and on plate ). in many cases, the circular panel is decorated by an ornament whioh is merely an enlarged rosette or cieling- flower, so that no clear line can be drawn between the two classes, (compare what has been said of the rosette on p. ). plate . the ctrculak panel. . assyrian, pavement, nimrud, (owen jones). . assyrian shield, khorsabad, (owen jones). . old frankish panel, sacramentarium, rheims. — . greek, paintings on vases, (lau). the circular panel. another well-known shapo results when two smaller semicircles are taken-'away from a larger, as when, for instance, two round-headed windown lights are enclosed by a common arch. finally we 'may mention the quadrant, which is not infrequently used in the angles of ceilings (figures and of plate ). plate . toe lunette, and toe spanraii. panels. . roman, (vulliamy). . italian renascence, (gewerbehalle). . arabian, (prisse d'avennes). . early gothic spanrail, stone church, england. — . arabian, mosaic spanrail, (prisse d'avennes). — . modern. plate . the lunette, and the spanhail panel. . renascence, intarsia, sta. maria in organo, verona, italian. : wrought-iron grill. . renascence, wrougth-iron grill, german. . renascence, plinth of a column, st. antonio, padua, (meurer) . modern, vaudeville theatre, paris, (raguenet). — . renascence, by vredeman de vries. the lozenge panel. (plate .) the lozenge in decorative art includes the rhombus, and the square when one of its diagonals is vertical. the lozenge is treated either as an upright panel, symmetrical to one axis (figs. , , and )j or the two diagonals are the axes of symmetry for a bi- axial pattern (figs. , and ). in the former case, the ornament consists of two; and in the latter case of four, similar parts. the lozenge is not often employed. occasionally it finds a place as a panel in lattices, doors, dadoes, ceilings, &c. plate . the lozenge panel. . door, nordlingen church, th century. — . grill, townhall, wurzburg, german renascence. — . modern decorative painting. various panels. (plates — .) plato and give a number of incidental panel-shapes, of which there is a great variety. the principle of decoration must enclosed ornament. plate . various panels. (i various panels. be adapted to each case; and should follow the analogy of tho prin ciples enunciated above. thus, for example, regular polygons with convex or concave sides (plate . and ); are treated similarly to polygons with straight sides. figures like those on plate . and , are decorated in the manner of an oblong or an ellipse. the ornament of plate . , recalls the decoration of tho lunette. the trapezoid is treated either as an upright panel, the central axis being perpendicular to the two parallels; or the ornamentation approaches that of a bi-axial oblong panel; but it will be somewhat modified, to fit the angles (plate . and ). this latter cir- cumstance has also to be taken into consideration in the case of a right-angled triangle of unequal sides, when the line of bisection of the right-angle is used as the axis of symmetry (plate . ); an unsymmetrical arrangement is best in this case, see figures to on the same plate. this latter free style of design, which is not bound by axial lines', may also be recommended for the baking parallelo- grams which occur on staircases. plate . yarious panels. . wrought-iron grill, townhall, villingen, late german re- nascence. — . balaustrade of staircase, frankfort on the main, german th century, (gewerbehalle). — . grill, pulpit-steps, thann, german th century, (gewerbe- halle). . grill, padua, italian renascence. . detail of lattice, late german renascence. . grill, late german renascence. plate . various panels. . trefoil tracery, gothic, (jacobsthal). . mural painting, swedish, romanesque, (racinet). . louvre, paris. — . marble inlaid-work, pulpit, cathedral, savona, italian renascence, (meurer). — . triangular panels, stalls of the laurentian library, florence, ascribed to michel angelo. e. repeating ornament. (diapers.) it is the essence, of repeated ornament, that it may be ex- tended on all sides at discretion, the component parts of the design (i. e. the pattern) admitting of uninterrupted repetition. the ele- ments are either geometrical, organic, or, as in the majority of cases, geometrical are combined with organic elements, sometimes with the addition of figures and artificial accessories. diaper ornament has either a poly-axial or a bi-axial character. in the former case, the decoration expands regularly on all sides; the basis is a system of inter- secting axes of symmetry, as shown in the square or triangular nets on plate . in the second case, the decoration consists of growth in an up- ward direction, the repetition on each side being secured by "turning the pattern over" symmetrically, or by juxtaposition (in the usual sense of the word). here, also, combination frequently occurs to this extent that many patterns have a poly-axial basis while single panels and medallions have upright decoration. growth in a downward direction, or in an oblique upward di- rection, <^b> j echinus spheroid cake-shaped t cytindricat spherical i inverted cone top-shaped inverted egg ettlpsoid egg-shaped i cd erect cask. c&nopus pear-shaped hypcrbotoid i -mjp . shaped wedge-shsped spindte-shaped drop-shaped plate . chart of fundamental vase forms. the amphora. — the urn. high foot. with or without cover. material: clay, more rarely glass, or other materials.. size: very variable, according to use. plate . the amphora. egyptian, with cover, thebes, thutmes iii. . egyptian, with cover, thebes, xx dynasty. . small four-sided, with latin inscription, found in egypt, unpainted clay, united collections, carlsruhe. . assyrian, with rope handle, clay. . roman, unpainted red clay, united collections, carlsruhe. . roman, unpainted yellow clay, found near aquileia in , united collections, carlsruhe. . roman, glass, with stopper, rouen, museum, (deville). . roman, iridescent glass, found at pompeii. ancient, attic, painted clay (so-called diota), munich, (lau). — . clay, painted in polychrome, with band-shaped handles, so- called alexandrian style, (lau and jacobsthal). . antique, black painted clay, (gropius). . antique state amphora, white marble, with swan handles, "vase of the athenian sosibios", louvre, paris. . modern french, state amphora, by lienard. . t faun with amphora, from the painted neck ol an antique drinking-horn, (compare plate . — ). the urn. (plate .) the urn is met-with, not only in the antiquo and all subsequent styles, but in early times everywhere and specially in prehistoric styles. apart from other purposes, the urn was frequently used in funeral rites, as a repository for the ashes of the dead, as a coffin, and so on. it has an erect body, profiled like an inverted egg or spindlo. the neck is comparatively wide and low, the mouth straight or curved outwards, usually closed by a cover. either without feet, or with a low round foot without handles, or with two small hori- zontal handles, attached to the greatest prominence of the body. material: clay. generally of considerable size. plate . tue urn. - egyptian, rubbing an urn, (menard et sauvageot). . prehistoric, gallic, (bosc). . grey clay, ornamentation in relief, united collections, carlsruhe. — . greek, painted clay, munich. . majolica, th century, italian. tbe urn. — the krater. — tbe basin, and dish. — . slavic, found in the district of the elbe and oder. . modern faience, bombay, (gewerbehalle). . majolica, th century, italian, (storck). . german, cut crystal, small with high foot, th century, na tional museum, munich, (eunsthandwerk). the krater (plate .) the krater is an antique vase, chiefly used for mixing water and wine (wine was not drunk unmixed); and perhaps also for ablu- tions. although we meet with it as early as egyptian times, it is not found in antique keramic art until its later periods. as a state vessel, the krater has probably been more highly developed than any other form. modern art employs the krater preferentially as a garden vase for plants. a characteristic of the krater is its great width at the top. the body is either a hemispherical dish (fig. ), or has a wide, cup - shaped neck, (figs. and ). where the junction is formed without a shoulder: we have the bell-shaped krater (figs. and ). the foot is frequently small; and so arranged that it stands on an independent base (fig. ). two, sometinies four, or more, horizontal or vertical handles, or hints of them. the principal materials were clay, marble, and metal. kraters are usually of con- siderable size. plate . the krater. . egyptian, with lotus cups. . egyptian, thebes, xviii dynasty. — . greek, munich, (lau). . greek, with columnar handles, munich, (lau). . greek, with volute handles, (lau). . antique, uffizi, florence, (gropius). . antique, marble, with four handles, found at ostia, evi- dently copied from a metal original. . ditto, found at tivoli, england. . antique, state vase, marble, the decoration of the neck, con- sisting of figures or rich scroll ornament, is omitted. . assyrian. — . antique, for ladies' toilet, greek vase-paintings. the basin, and dish. (plate .) basins, and dishes, are vessels of such common use, that they are found everywhere, and in all periods in which fhe keramic art vases. the krater. plate . the basin, and dish. tans been practised. their uses are manifold; their form is indicated by their names: dishes are the deeper, plate:; the shallower vessels. they occur without foot, and with a round or high foot. the last was specially adopted for the greek kylix. handles are wanting, or occur singly, or in pairs, horizontal, vertical, as hoop handles, and so on. material, and size: various. the decoration of dishes is generally on the exterior; and of plates is generally on the inner or upper face. in the latter case: the border and the centre are ornamented separately, being divided from each other by a neutral, undecorated zone, (figs. — ). to paint the entire surface with figures, dis- regarding the division of border and centre, would be contrary to correct style. piate . the hasin, and the dish. . egyptian dish, with hoop handles, metal, (menard et sauvagcot). . egyptian dish, with erect handles, metal, (menard et sauvageot). . greek dish, yellow clay, painted brown and red, geo- metrical style, united collections, carlsruhe. . view from above, of the handles of the abovo. . greek dish, yellow clay, ornamented with horn - like, ex- crescences, painted red, geometrical style, united collections, carlsruhe. . greek dish,- with high foot (kylix), yellow clay, decoration brown, geometrical style, munich, the interior is decorated with the ornament shown on plate . . . ditto. . greek, -flat dish, with ring foot, munich, (lau). . antique footless dish, (jacobsthal). . antique, small dish, with low foot, silver treasure, hildcs- heim. . antique, metal dish, with high volute handles, (menard et sauvageot). . roman, glass dish, with pierced handle ring, found in nor- mandy, (deville). — . majolica dish, view and section, italian renascence. — id. modern glass plates, with scalloped border. . modorn soup-tureen, with cover. . modern french metal dish, with vertical handle and three feet, (julienne). . modern spanish, small dish, of variegated glazed clay, malaga, united, collections, carlsruhe. . modern coffee-bowl, with horizontal handles. . handle of no. , viewed from abovo. vases, ml the basiin, ami the dish. plate . the ampulla, alabastron, ac. — the flower-vase, sec. the ampulla, alauastuon, &c. (plate iso.) the ampulla is a diminutive amphora, often in black painted clay, adorned with impressed ornament (figs. — ). the phiale is a slender vessel, without handles, with elongated body, and long narrow neck, of clay or glass (figs. — ). the alabastron has a bag-like or cylindrical body, no foot, a very narrow neck with a shoulder, a large plate-like mouth, and little ear-shaped handles (figs. — ). this vessel was intended for the reception of oils and unguents; it was made of alabaster or striped glass, whence its name. the lachrymatory, so-called from its tear-like profile, or from its purpose, is a glass vessel, of the forms shown in figs. and . not less frequent are little bag forms like the handleless vessels given in figs. , , and . like those already named, they were intended for toilet or religious purposes. plate g. the ampulla, alahastron, &c . egyptian phiale, with cover, thutmes iii. . antique phiale, painted clay, munich, (lau). . antique glass phiale, (stackelberg). . antique glass ampulla, striped bright blue and yellow. . antique ampulla, black painted clay with impressed orn- aments, athens, united collections, carlsruhe. . ditto, athens. — . antique, small vessels, painted clay, united collections, carls- ruhe. — . antique glass lachrymatories, museum, nuremberg, and united collections, carlsruhe. . antique alabastron, veined glass, imitating oriental ala- baster. . antique alabastron, milk-white glass, with brown stripes, campana collection, (l'art pour tous). . vase, white iridescent glass, campana collection, (l'art pour tous). . modern japanese, small vase, with mask handles, landes- gewerbehalle, carlsruhe. . old german, small stoneware vase. the flower-vase, &c. (plate .) flower-vase is the name given to vessels intended to receive and support bouquets of living or dried flowers. various as the forms of these vessels may be in other respects, their purpose requires that thev vases. plate . the flower-vase, &c. the flower-vase, &c. — vase-forms for various purposes. should have a funnel-shaped mouth. japan and china, which have been especially prolific in this group, use cylindrical and prismatic forms. such vessels do not possess a cover; handles, which are equally super- fluous, are also generally wanting; the decoration should avoid any attempt to imitate natural plant motives. glass, clay, and porcelain are the predominant materials. a special example of theso vessels is the so-called "hyaeinth-glass" intended for forcing bulbs in water. as it is desirable that the root should be visible, recourse must be had to some transparent material. decoration is excluded in the caso of the ordinary flower-pot, which must admit air and moisture. this has led to the use of the decorated flower-pot, an example of which is given in fig. . the suspended flower-vase, like suspended vases in general, must be furnished with three or more handles to which the cords and chains may bo attached; but it need not have a foot unless it intended to stand also. plate . the flower-vase, &c. . chinese, with cloison enamel, (lievro). . modern english, in oriental style, blue glazed clay, with black ornament, landesgewerbeballe, carlsruhe. . modern, glazed clay, with decoration in colours. . modern italian majolica, landesgewerbehalle, carlsruhe. . modern, coloured stoneware, (gewerbehalle). . glass, th century. — . modern, glass. — . modern, hyacinth-glasses, (no. is patented: the upper part is made to lift out for greater convenience of pouriug- in water). . modern, decorated flower pot, green glazed clay. . arabian suspended lamp, enamelled glass, conventional form, (part of the ornamentation is omitted). — . modern suspended flower-vases, of glazed clay. vase-forms for various purposes. (plate .) this plate exhibits a numbor of receptacles for salt and other ppices, vinegar, oil, ink, c. the name "cellar" and "stand" have little connection with the form of these vessels, which may be very various. receptacles for oil and vinegar are often called "cruets". vessels belonging to this group havo not been preserved to us from the antique; but we may not conclude, from this, that salt, oil, and rococo periods h.ive only occasionally been taken into account. that particular attention has been paid to the german renascence, is based on the fact, that this period is specially distinguished for its achievements in the field of richly;decorated furniture. this chapter might seem to offer an inducement to give a historical account of the development of tectonic form in the different periods of art. but to do this, with any thoroughness, would also require us to abandon the conciseness we have hitherto maintained: and furniture. we will therefore only refer the reader to the details in semper: "der stil", and to the highly-interesting work by georg hirth: "das deutsche zimmer der gothik und renaissance, des barock-, rokoko-, und zopfstils" (g. hirth, 'munich and leipzig). the necessary in- formation about the furniture of the egyptians, assyrians, greeks, and romans will be found in menard et sauvageot: "la tie privie des anciens"; and about the middle ages in viollet-le-duc: "die- tionnaire baisonne" du mobilier francais"; from both of which works we have taken numerous examples for our plates. besides these, there is such a number of cyclopaedic works on this subject that it is impossible even to name them all here. a. scats. as regards seats: the fundamental form has generally been depen- dent on the special purpose, and on the ever-varying mode of life; while the details have been influenced by the artistic taste of the time, and by the material used. definite fundamental types often recur by the side of new and arbitrary special forms; and we hive attempted a classification according to these fundamental forms. the simplest and most primitive form, although for many pur- poses the least comfortable, is that of the taboret or ottoman, which is without a back. the chair is more comfortable because of the addition of the back; and it becomes still more so, when arms are added. to this group belongs the throne, which in view of its pur- pose is more monumental in form, and richer in material. revolving, folding, and rocking chairs meet the demand for special purposes. the stall, and the "prie-dieu" also have peculiar accessories, due to their being used for other purposes than sitting. the bench and the couch offer a seat or repose for several persons simultaneously. in spite of the variety of forms, one feature is common to nearly all, namely, the height of the seat in order to sit comfortably, the feet should just reach the ground, and the height of the seat is there- fore from ins. to ins. the depth of the seat shows greater va- riations, from ins. to ins. the height of the back varies from ins. and more; the fact having to be taken into consideration that the. head, when it is leant back, should have a proper support. the upper surface of the arms should be about ins. above that of the seat. straight, upright backs are less comfortable than curved lines adapted to the vertebral curve. similarly: flat, horizontal seats are not so suitable as those which slope downwards towards the back. the principal materials are wood, cane, and metal; stone, terra- cotta, &c., are rarer. as it is unpleasant to rest against a hard the chair. material for any length of time, recourse is had to cane, or flexible seats, skins, cushions, and upholstering. in course of titno, chairs have become more comfortable with the progress of comfort in general. it may be specially emphasized that the handsomest and most richly- decorated seats are not usually the most practical; further remarks are reserved for the discussion of the different forms. the chair. (plates — .) the chair is a stool with a back to it. the most usual form has four legs. sometimes the legs are connected-together by braces or ties, which are called foot-rails. the seat generally has the shape of an oblong, a square, or a trapezium. circular and polygonal seats are less common. hexagonal and octagonal seats, with a corresponding number of legs, begin to appear in the th century; and certain wooden chairs of the renascence have seats in the form of regular or semi-regular polygons (plate . , , ). the legs are prismatic or turned, frequently with claw feet, while the top of the back terminates in knobs, animal-heads, or masks (plates . ; . ; . , , ). instead of legs, the seats of the wooden chairs of the renascence are sometimes supported by perforated and carved boards, either at the two sides or in front and behind (plate . , , ). where the back is carved out of a single piece, as is the case with many renascence and modern chairs, the two hinder legs have the same form and height as the front legs (plates . , ; . ). very often the back is treated as a frame (plate . , , ), or is bent into a cylindrical plan, as in the greek "klismos" (plate i. , ), and its imitation, the empire chair (plate . ). openings for the hand are made in carved wooden backs for convenience in moving (plate . , , ). where the top of the back is hori- zontal, it is often crowned with a cornice or an ornament (plates . ; . ). where the seat, alone or in conjunction with the back, is of woven cane-work or padded, the chair is termed a "cane" or an "upholstered" chair. sometimes not only the padding but also the entire structure of the chair is upholstered in some material, just as, on the other hand, chairs may be made entirely of cane or rushes. the seats and backs of upholstered chairs are covered with leather, or textiles (plate . ). the'overlaying of wood with metal occurs in the assyrian style, and occasionally in later periods; the state- chairs of the middle ages, especially the byzantine, are not infre- quently decorated with coloured stones; a similar treatment may be observed in the renascence example (plate figs. , and ). in addition to the decoration by carving (which will always bo the chief furniture. ' the cbair. plate . . furniture. plate . the chair. the throne, and the arm-chair. — the stall. . roman arm-chair, found in herculanenm, museum at portici, (itaguenet). . antique terracotta, representing an arm-chair in the form of the hollowed-out body of a sphinx, (l'art pour tous). . chair of s. peter, wood with ivory reliefs iilustrating the story of hercules, s. peter's at rome, (menard et sauvageot). plate . the throne, and the arm-chaih. . norwegian stall, th century, from b , telemark. . mediaeval arm-chair, with foot-stool and draped back, (viollet- lo-duc). . king david's arm-chair, th century, from relief, portal of cathedral, auxerre, (viollet-le-duc). . frame of mediaeval arm-chair, iron, the drapery omitted, (viollet- le-duc). . mediaeval polygonal chair, painting, chapel in toulouse, (viollet- le-duo). . mediaeval arm-chair, metal, the drapery omitted, th centurv, (viollet-le-duc). . mediaeval arm-chair, decorated with fringe, end of the th cen- tury, bas-relief, stalls, amiens, (viollet-le-duc). . english arm-chair, th century, wood, upholstered. . arm-chair, louis xvi style, wood carved and gilded, (williamson). . modern arm-chair. . modern arm-chair. (raguenet). the stall. (plate g.) the rows of seats along the north, west, and south sides ot the choir in chapels, &c., are termed stalls. they have a peculiar con- struction corresponding to their special use. in the earliest period of the middle ages the single seats to the right and left of the bishop's chair were built into the wall of the chancel, at a later period they were replaced by moveable seats; and these again, from about the th century onwards, were replaced by stalls, strictly so-called; the seats being united in a continuous row, with an architectonic character and construction. there are generally two rows, one behind the other, and the hinder row is a little elevated. partitions divide the seats from one another; and serve as arms. between the partitions are the seats. these are either fixed or arranged to fold back. in the latter case a console-like projection is attached to the underside of the seat, to serve as a kind of rest when the seat is folded-back; thus, out of pity for the aged monks, rendering it possible to rest furniture. late . the throne, and the arm-chair. the stall — the stool. while appearing to stand; hence the significant name of these sup- ports, "miserere" the backs of the hinder row of seats form a screen; and are usually decorated with carving, intarsia, &c.; and are furnished with a canopy. in front of the seat, there is generally a kneeling-stool. where there are several rows of seats, the prayer- desks of the one row serve at the same time as the backs of the next lower row. when the front rows are interrupted by passages leading to the hinder rows, the stall-ends are richly decorated. a large number of magnificent stalls of the gothic, and still more of the renascence period, have been preserved in england, germany, france, italy, and elsewhere, to. enumerate them all would take too long. enormous pains have frequently been lavished on these works. rich ornamental and architectural motives alternate with represen- tations from bible history and the legends of the saints; secular and satirical compositions are also no rarity; so that stalls are altogether of high importance for the history of art as well as of civilisation. to exemplify what has been said, the plate gives a few examples, which are far from being among the most sumptuous. plate . the stall. . sta. maria novella, florence, decorated with intarsias, by baccio d'agnolo, end of the th century, (teirich). . side-view, and section of above. . laurentian library, florence, beginning of the th century, said to be by michelangelo, (gewerbehalle). . side-view, and section of the central row, great church, dortrecht, dutch renascence. . modern french, convent of elisabeth, fourvieres near lyons, ar- tect leo, (raguenet). the stool. (plate .) the simplest seat is the taboret or stool, which .is the chair without a back. as our plate shows, , it has been in use from the earliest times. the most primitive, and at {he same time the most stable, is probably the round seat with three legs; the egyptian example, (fig. ), may be regarded as the prototype of the modern cobblor's-stool. the plasterer's-stool, which has only one leg, is in deed still simpler; and bears some resemblance to our modern walking- stick camp-stools. the four-legged taboret is generally square, and possesses the samo features as the lower part of a chair. it is made with or without upholstery, and with or without foot-rails. here, plate . the stall. the folding-chair. — the bench. the" folding-chair may be a stool, a chair, or an ann-chair. sometimes it can be folded-up as it stands, like our iron folding- chairs for use in the open air; sometimes it must be taken to pieces before it can be folded-up, like the chair shown on fig. . the most suitable material is metal (bronzo or iron). folding-chairs of wood are very often so constructed as not to fold at all, but are merely imitations with the purpose overlooked (fig. ). the seat is fre- quently of bands, either textile or leather. where the seat is not flexible, it must be arranged to be moveable by means of hinges. thrones have been sometimes made like folding-chairs. we may also mention: the camp-stools for tourists, sportsmen, painters, &c. the principles of decoration are sufficiently elucidated by the figures of the plate. plate . tiie folding-chair. . egyptian, tomb of chambali, th dynasty. . antique, (diphros okladias). . greek, tomb of an agonothetes, found in krissa, (delphi). . antique. . mediaeval, nonncnberg, (mothes). . mediaeval, miniature painting, representing king nabuchodonosor, th or th century, (viollet-le-duc). . mediaeval, bronze gilt, throne of dagobert, restored. . mediaeval, bronze, th century, (viollet-le-duc). . renascence. . french renascence, sens cathedral, (raguenet). the bench. (plate .) the bench is an elongated seat, usually intended for several per- sons. in its simplest form, as a board with four legs, it was already known.in antiquity. in the middle ages and the renascence, it was in general use; and was employed not only as a seat, but as a table, as is shown by such terms as "work-bench", &c. the bench-seat was afterwards furnished with a back and arms, the back being fre- quently formed like the canopy over stalls (fig. ). it was uphol- stered with cushions and draped with textiles. the material is gene- rally wood; but in public buildings there are also benches made of stone. this latter material and iron, frequently combined with wood, are the-most suitable for benches in the open air. a further variety is formed by the double-bench, with a back in the middle; this back is moveable, as shown in the example (fig. ). as the bench, in most cases, is intended for every-day use, it is generally undecorated. those of the middle ages are more the furniture. the bench. plate . * the bench. — the sofa, and the couch. work of the carpenter than that of the cabinet-maker, but the re- nascence, especially in italy, has created some finely-decorated examples. plate . the bench. , , and . middle ages, (viol «t-ie-duc). . mediaeval, double with moveable back, for use in front of the fireplace, (viollet-le-duo). . renascence, with arms, (ducerceau). . renascence, with canopied back, church at flavigny, french, (viollet-le-duc). — , renascence, with podium, italian, (teirich). the sofa, and the couch. (plate .) the sofa and the couch are among upholstered furniture what the bench is among wooden furniture. by the side of forms which are nothing more than elongated chairs, occur others which have more the character of the bed. the intention of these pieces of furniture is therefore to be found in their availability for both lying and sitting. according as the one or the other object becomes predo- minant, the symmetrical form (figs. — ), or the unsymmetrical form with strongly marked head (figs. and ), is employed. in accordance with the double object, the arms are frequently treated as cylindrical cushions (fig. ), or upholstered with cushions (fig. ). although furniture of this nature was. not unknown to the an- tique, as shown by the roman examples (figs. and ), these articles cannot be said to have come into common use before the last three centuries; and now-a-days the sofa is found in every middle-class household. what enormities our modern times have perpetrated in this direction is evidenced by-the s-shapcd ottomans for two persons, which are sometimes to be found in our saloons. we may here briefly mention the transitional form which is found in waiting-rooms, and public vehicles; and the circular otto- man with centre-piece for flowers, which occupies the centre of the floor in galleries. plate . the sofa, and the couch. . roman bedstead (leclus cubicularis) in the form of a sofa, (menard et sauvageot). . ditto. . mediaeval bench, with cushions and drapery, (viollet-le-duc). — . modern forms of the sofa, (gewerbehallc, &c.'). . modern couch. the sofa, and the couch. plate . the table. j decoration to be properly seen. where the top is decorated, tho orna- mentation is flat, consisting of intarsia-work, incising, painting, &c. the size of the table varies according to the purposo for which it is intended; its height, on the contrary, is subjeet to little varia- tion, and is about ft. / ins. for ordinary tables. tables, with legs which could be adjusted to varying heights, were in use in tho antique period, being required by the social life of that time; a similar arrangement may also be seed on some modern artists' tables, which can not only bo adjusted to different heights, but also allow the top to be slanted. the following remarks are from the point of view of 'history and style. the egyptian, assyrian, and persian tables, chiefly known to us from the representations of altars, have legs terminating in claws. this motive was also popular among the greeks and romans, with the difference that the latter nations permit the claws to rest directly on the ground, while the former support the claws upon small circular plinths. the legs of antique tables are frequently of bronze; they have a similar form with those of the tripod; and like them are adjustable, as already observed (fig. ). the table-tops are often of stone or wood. large rectangular tables with stone supports of rich workmanship, and round tables with three legs of marble, a considerable number of which are given on plates and , are well known to us from the excavations at pompeii. they were not dining-tables but state-tables which stood in the tablinum and atrium of roman houses. dining-tables of the modern form were unknown to the antique; even in the early greek period, while it was still the custom to sit at dinner, each diner had his own separate table; and the same custom continued in the later period when meals were taken in a recumbent posture. these little tables were lower than ours. we also find them in similar forms among the romans (fig. ), along with larger banqueting-tables, around three sides of which the sofas were ranged as shown | |. the late roman period was one of lavish luxury; we are told, for example, of tables with legs of silver and ivory, and with table-tops of rare woods, &c. in- credible prices, up to £ , , were paid for a single choice top. the tables of the middle ages were generally rectangular or semicircular, rested on posts or trestles, were plain, and rather cumbrous. it is said of charlemagne, however, that he possessed three of silver, and one golden (?) table. beautiful and richly-designed tables of very different kinds have been preserved from the time of the renascence. of particularly frequent occurrence, are richly-carved side-trusses (fig. ), simpler forms of which were already in use in the gothic period (fig. ). in the barocco and rococo periods, the legs are curved, and the tops are of bold, arbitrary design (fig. ). the console-table is an invention of this period. it was also at this furniture. plate . the table. the table. — the writing-table. time that the dumb-waiter, came into general use. as far as art is concerned, our modern tables are mostly copies of old models. plate gives a small selection from the copious material. plate . the table. . antique, bronze, museum, naples, (raguenet). . antique, bronze, (menard et sauvageot). . roman, (kantharos of ptolemy). . mediaeval, chronicle of louis xi, (viollet-le-duc). . late gothic, municipal collection of antiquities, freiburg, (schau- insland). . renascence, with turned legs, french, castle of bussy - rabutin, (c te d'or). . renascence, with carved side-trusses, french, (ducerceau). . french, th century, garde-meuble, paris, (raguenet). . modern, renascence style. . modern. . modern, french, paris, (raguenet). the writing-table. (plate .) the peculiar construction of the writing-table removes it from the category of ordinary tables. in a certain sense it .forms the transition to the cabinets, in the form in which it is now manu- factured. the writing-table is a product of modern civilisation. in earlier times, when writing was the privilege of the select few, the common table evidently served the purpose. it is also true that the old caligraphers, used special writing apparatus, either desks which could be rested on the knees (fig. ), or small tables, an example of which is given in fig. . but it was reserved for our much-writing modern time to invent special furniture for business and private use. the writing-table must not only serve for writing, but also as a receptacle for stationery, correspondence, writing-materials, &c. hence it is furnished with cupboards, drawers, pigeon-holes, and shelves. it is often furnished with side-cupboards below the table-top having a space between them for the legs of the writer. where the table has an upper part, which admits of a variety of constructions, as may be seen from the few examples of the plate, it is usually of lesser depth than the surface of the table so as to leave the no- cessary room for writing. the same end is attained by leaving a space equal to the whole depth free between it and the table-top, as shown by fig. . the table-top is often covered with some textile material or with leather, to afford a soft surface for writing-upon plate . the writing-table. i'late . the cabinet. plate . the sideboard. furniture. plate . the hanging-cabinet. the desk, &c. — the clock-case, &c the beginning of the middle ages. they are made of wood, or metal, or of both combined. we distinguish between single and double desks. the lectern is frequently supported on the back of an eagle with outspread wings, a design which is supposed to contain a reference to the evangelist s. john, whose symbol in the eagle. ecclesiastical desks eiter have a fixed position in the choir or chancel, or they are moveable. these latter were sometimes like a saw-horse and could be folded-up; in which case the slope was replaced by bands (fig. ). the upper part of fixed desks frequently revolves, and is furnished with sconces for lights. the easel is a sloping frame with three or four legs. the front and rear are often connected by hinges to enable the angle of the slope to be altered at will. the front is provided with a small board, which can be adjusted to different heights by pins or other mechanism. it is an invention of modern times; and in its usual undecorated, form is employed by painters, sculptors, ac . but it is often made as a decorative piece of furniture of superior finish, to hold pictures, portfolios, &c. the decoration in this case may consist of the sym- bols of art, as shown in fig. . plate . the desk, &c. . gothic, th century, base of wood, slope of wrought-iron, eagle and ball gilt, dragon painted green, s. siraphorien, nuits, (viollet- le-duc). . mediaeval, san stefano, "venice, (mothes). . renascence, marble, pisa cathedral, italian, (kunsthandwerk). . mediaeval, double-desk with revolving shaft, end of th century (viollet-le-duc). . mediaeval, upper part of double-desk, (viollet-le-duc). * . renascence, folding stand, cathedral, s. gimignano, italian, (kunst- handwerk). . modern decorative easel, architect durm, (gewerbehalle). the clock-case, &c. (plate .) the clock-case, as a piece of furniture, is of comparatively recent date, for the invention of the clock with a train of wheels is itself not old; and for some time after their introduction clocks were manu- factured without cases or, at any rate, without cases of artistic importance. in the th century, cases for protecting the works against dust and for giving the clock a more pleasing aspect, begin to appear. the forms at first manufactured were chiefly two. the first is that of the old-fashioned tall hall-clock, something like the toilet-stands (figs. and ), the upper part accommodating the clock furniture. mate . the clock-case, &c. the clock-case, &c. — the bedstead, ana the cradle. . toilet-stand, german renascence, , town-hall, ueberlingen, (gewerbehalle). . toilet-stand, various coloured woods, german renascence, (formen- schatz). the bedstead, and the cradle. (plates — g .) from the earliest to the present time, the bedstead has passed through many changes. in the egyptian and assyrian styles: we find metal bedsteads imitating the forms of animals (plate . , ); and sometimes arranged to fold up like a camp-bed (plate . ). those of the greeks and romans, which served partly as beds, and partly as couches, are of manifold forms. in addition to tho four-legged bench (plate . ), we have benches with a head-board (plate . ), with head and foot board (plate . ), the latter being usually lower than the former, and others with head, foot, and back boards, like our modern sofas (plate . ). the materials are wood and metal, sometimes more precious materials, ivory, sbc € € modern text. plate . ornamental letters. loman initials. plate . roman lettera. — constructions, numerats, and monograms. plate . roman letters. . modern. . modern. . renascence italic, gottlieb munch, ordnung der schrift, . . renascence lower-case italic, michael bauernfeind, nuremberg , (hrachowina). plate . constructions, numerals, and monograms. . roman capitals. . . german text, and large gothic uncial letters. — . arabic numerals, th and th centuries. , , and . modern monograms of two and three letters, (raguenet). . modern monogram, dir. g tz. . monogram of a name: "laugier", (raguenet). . monogram of christ; formed of the greek initials qf the name of christ, found in the catacombs. ii is frequently combined with the letters ii, in allusion to rev. xxii. : "i am alpha and omega" (compare plate . ). of later date is the monogram ihs, the first three letters of the name jesus, ihz y , when written with greek letters, which was afterwards selected by the jesuits as the badge of their order. it has been variously explained as meaning: "jesus hominum salvator" (jesus the saviour of men); "in hoc salus" (in him is salvation); "jesus habemus socium" (we have jesus for our companion); or: "in hoc signo vinces" (in this sign thou shalt conquer). index. eothon: . krater: . kyathob: . kylix: , ( . *). label: . lace: . lachrimatory: . ladle: . lamp: . „ , pendant: , ( . isl „ , table: . lance: . lantern: . laurel: , ( . o). lazy-tongs: . leaf band: . „ , (natural): . lectern: . lectus cubicularis: . leg, (furniture): . lekythos: . letters: . link border: . lion, (heraldic): . „ , (natural): . „ , head: , ( . »,io). lizard: ( . l). lock-escutcheon: ( . ). lotus: , ( . i), ( . - ), ( . ), ( . , ). lozenge, panel: , ( . , ), ( . ). „ , subdivision: . lunette, panel: . lynx, head: ( . s). mace: . maeander: see fret. mantling, (heraldic): . maple, leaf: ( . . ). margin: see . mars' head: ( . ). martel-axe: . mask: . match-holder: . medallion: , ( . , , s). medusa, head: . mermaid: ( . ). metal objects: . minerva, head: ( . , ). mirror-frame: . mirror, hand: . miberere-seat: . mitre: ( . n—«). monogram: . monstrance: . morion: . mosaic: . motto: . mouldings, enrichments of: . . mug: . mural painting: . natural foems: . nautilus-shell: ( . ) necklace: . neck-ring: ( . , ). needle-case: . network: . numerals: . oak, leaf: ( . , ), ( . ), s\ objects, decorated: . oblong, panel: . „ , subdivision: . octagon, subdivinion: . oinochos: . olive: . olpe: . order, (heraldic): . ordinary, (heraldic): . ornament applied to ?ea- tures: . oval, construction: . ovolo, enrichment of: . ox, head: ( . ). painting: see mural painting. palrnette band: . palm, leaf: . panels: . panther, (heraldic): ( . ). „ , head: . papcr-knife: . papyrus: . university of michigan-flint library lilli i i hi university of kichigan-flint library a history of ornament west front of reims cathedral, - history of ornament ancient and medieval by a. d. f. hamlin, a.m., l.h.d., a.i.a. professor or the history of architecture in columbia university with illustrations new york cooper square publishers, inc. copyright, , by the century co. publish**, octobtr, originally published reprinted by permission of genevieve karr hamlin published by cooper square publishers, inc. fourth avenue, new york, new york international standard book number - - - library of congress catalog card number - printed in the united states of america to my students in grateful recognition of their interest and de- votion which for thirty- three years past have made teaching for me a continuous pleasure preface books on ornament are so many that to add to their number may seem at first sight a wholly superfluous task. yet in all the long lists of the bibliographies of the subject there appears a singular lack of systematic treatises on the history of the various styles which have marked the growth and progress of decorative .art. elaborate compendiums of ornament grouped by styles or by other categories are not wanting; the splendid "grammar of ornament" of owen jones, and "orna- ment polychrome" of racinet; the "ornamentenschatz" of dolmetsch, the "handbook of ornament" of franz sales meyer, speltz's "styles of ornament," and the excellent plates of "historic ornament" published by the prang educational company, are examples of such collections of ornament, all meritorious in various ways, and all highly serviceable to students and decorators. but in the whole catalogue of the avery library of co- lumbia university—the richest collection in this coun- try of works on architecture and the allied arts—i have found but two titles of systematic histories of ornament, one in french and one in german; neither available for those who read only english, and neither of them, even for those who can read french or german, exactly suited to the needs of the average english or american student of architecture or decoration. i have for years felt the need of some such text-book vii preface for students in my own courses in columbia university in the history of ornament. of the many works in eng- lishj french or german, mentioned above, which to any extent recognize the historical element in the styles of ornament, some are too expensive for student use; some are too brief or too superficial in their text, some inade- quate in their illustrations. in response to many ap- peals from teachers in other institutions, from their stu- dents and from my own, and with a view of meeting my own needs in teaching, i have ventured on the task of attempting such a systematic history of ornament. this volume represents the first half of the work which i hope to complete by a second volume, if this one shall meet with the favor of the public. it is, however, complete in itself, as it covers the ancient and medieval styles, leaving the styles of the renaissance, of modern times and of the orient, for the second volume. the predominance of illustrations from architecture is due not merely to the fact that these chapters are based on lectures to architects; but also to the fact that the styles are most clearly exhibited in the progress of architecture as the "mistress art." it is hoped that the "books recommended" will enable the reader to supply for himself the illustrations from the other arts which he finds lacking in this work. with regard to the illustrations, i may say that the majority are either from my own drawings or reproduced directly from photographs. as they are presented purely to illustrate the subject and not as models of draftsmanship, i trust they will not be too severely criticised on the technical side. the extreme small- viii preface ness of many of them has been made necessary by the desire to keep the volume within modest limits of size and price. for the same reason the number of plates in color had to be restricted. larger plates, larger cuts and more of them, would have made the book bulky and costly beyond measure, at least for student use. i beg herewith to make my acknowledgments to all who have helped me in preparing these illustrations: especially to a number of my students, whose names will be found in the list of illustrations; to messrs. chapman and hall for the use of several illustrations from ward's "historic ornament"; to messrs. long- mans, green & co. for the use of a cut of capitals from my "history of architecture"; to the prang educa- tional company, for the use of a number of illustrations in color from their "plates of historic ornament"; to the publishers of the "architectural record" for several cuts from various issues; to the "american architect" for permission to use a number of my own illustrations in various issues between and ; to the metro- politan museum of art, new york, for permission to reproduce a number of the museum's official photo- graphs of casts and models in the willard architectural collection; to the house of bruno hessling for permis- sion to reproduce a number of illustrations from meyer's handbook of ornament, and my fig. from speltz, styles of ornament; to my daughter genevieve for two drawings; and to the officers of the avery library for much valuable assistance cheerfully rendered. i have tried to give credit, in my list of illustrations, for all such assistance, and to indicate the sources of the il- ix preface lustrations as far as possible. some of them, however, were drawn so long ago, or have come into my posses- sion from sources so long forgotten, that i have not been able in every case to do this. i trust i have not tres- passed on any one's proprietary rights in any case. many of my own drawings are re-interpretations of sub- jects appearing in other works; in such cases i have, where possible, indicated the source by the words "after" so-and-so. there are two classes of figures besides the plates i to xxii: those in the text, and those gathered into pages distributed through the text. to aid the reader in finding the references to illustrations, i have in the text referred to all of the first class,—those in the text— by the abbreviation "fig." or "figs."; while the word "figure" refers always to illustrations grouped in pages; the page-reference is sometimes added. i desire to express my appreciation of the cordial and generous cooperation of the century co. in the prepa- ration of this work. i commend this fruit of my labors to the kind con- sideration of teachers and students of architecture and decorative design, and to designers generally, with the hope that it will be found to meet their needs and prove useful both in the class-room and the studio. a. d. f. hamlin. christmas cove, maine, august , x contents chapter page i introductory ii primitive and savage ornament .... iii egyptian ornament iv chaldea and assyria v west asiatic ornament: phrygia, lydia and persia vi pre-hellenic ornament: jsgean and asiatic vii greek ornament, i viii greek ornament, ii ix etruscan and roman ornament, i . . . . x roman ornament, ii xi pompehan ornament xii early christian or basilican ornament . . xiii byzantine ornament xiv romanesque ornament: i, italian and french xv romanesque ornament: ii. anglo-norman, german, spanish and scandinavian . . . xvi gothic ornament: structural xvii gothic carving and industrial and accessory arts xviii particular schools op gothic ornament: i. french and english xix particular schools op gothic ornament: ii. german, spanish, italian index list of illustrations in the following list, the sources of the illustrations are indicated wher- ever possible. a number of them, however, have been made from drawings, tracings or engravings in the author's possession from sources he has been unable to identify. all illustrations not otherwise designated are from original drawings by the author. wherever these have been based on or suggested by illustrations in other works, the fact is expressed by "a. after" followed by the source from which the drawing has been derived or on which it is based. many cuts are from drawings by students of columbia uni- versity; these are indicated by the initials c. u., followed in some cases by the student's name. it has not been possible to trace the source of all these drawings. other abbreviations and references are as follows: a. = author; a. c. h. = haddon, evolution in art; a. m. n. h. = american museum of natural history, new york; arch. rec. = architectural record (n. y.); a. p. t.=>l'art pour tous; bond = introduction to english church architecture; colling = gothic foliage, gothic ornaments; f. & l. = furtwangler und losehke, mykenische vasen; f. p. = flinders-petrie, egyptian decorative art; hauser = styllehre der architektonischen formen des mittelalters; loftus = researches in chaldaa, etc.; met. mus.t=imetro- politan museum of art, new york; meyer == meyer's ornamentale formenlehre; o. j. ==. owen jones, grammar of ornament; p. d'a. = prisse d'avennes, l'art egyptien; p. & c. = perrot et chipiez, histoire de i'art dans i'antiquiti; pho. = photograph; jl list of illustrations paqi . carved foliage: porte de la vierge, notre dame, paris ....! . orange border, semi-naturalistic (a. after ill. in journal of the royal society, )! . persistence in ornament: trilobe lotus motives, egyptian, greek, roman, gothic! . convergence and reversion: the anthemion motive, greek, roman, byzantine i . anthemion motives, greek and byzantine . accidental convergence: a, egyptian flower; b, byzantine cy- presses . primitive dagger-handle, neolithic s . new zealand tiki-tiki pattern: a, carved; , stamped .... . maori spear-head: eyes and tongue . papuan manhood-belt: face motives (a. after a. c. h.) ... . typical basketry forms . peruvian grass-cloth: animal motive, toucan . peruvian orass-cloth: animal motive, dog . savage carvings: a, new zealand; , hawaiian . brazilian "fish" and "bat" patterns (a. after a. c. h.) . . . . scratched ornament on maori flute (a. after a. c. h.) ... . brazilian and new zealand face motives . tusayan (mexican) jar (in a. m. n. h.) . chiriqui alligator motives (a. after a. c. h.) . maori paddle: detail so. javanese war-drum head (a. after a. c. h.) . a, pueblo jar; , spiral from vase in pi. ii, ; c, prehistoric jar from budmer, bosnia . mexican jar, in a. m. n. h . detail from sarcophagus of menkaura (a. after p. & c.) . . . . slate palette in louvre (a. after capart) . dish of fruit, from a tomb (a. after f. p.) . the lotus: a, natural; b, c, conventionalized . lotus forms: a, full flower; b-c, trilobe forms . lotus border, from a tomb (a. after o. j.) . lotus border, from a tomb (a. after p. d'a.) . lotus rosette . lotus and spiral pattern (a. after p. d'a.) . the papyrus plant . detail of campaniform capital . lotus or aquatic plant . detail of campaniform capital, from luxor . painted campaniform capital, karnak . . . s. . painted papyrus-head cap (a. after p. d'a.) . spiral all-over, with rosettes (a. after p. d'a.) . fret, or key-pattern, with rosettes . zigzags and lozenges . spiral waves and rosettes xiv list of illustrations page . intersecting circle pattern . spirals on scarab seal (a. after f. p.) . palmette with tabs (a. after w. h. g.) . palmettes; a, jewel, th dynasty; b, painted (a. after w. h. g.) . palmette-and-bead necklace . vulture, painted on ceiling (a. after p. d'a.) . winged globe, cornice (a. after p. & c.) . uraeus cresting, ptolemaic (from an engraving) . feather ornament (a. after f. p.) . decoration by lines, imbrications and chevron . typical egyptian cornice . three columns; a, b, e, upper part and plans; d, lower part of clustered shaft (a. after meyer) . . . three egyptian capitals (a. after meyer) . osirid pier (a. after p. & c.) . mosaic wall-pattern (a. after loftus) . assyrian motives: a, lotus; , palmette; e, rosette (after meyer); d, imbrications (after o. j.); t, winged disk or globe (after layard); f, guilloche (after p. & c); h, pomegranate; i, pome- granate-palmette scratched on ivory (a. after a. c. h.) ... . a, b, pine-cone lotus border, carved: c. part of sacred tree (after ward) . assyrian volutes . a, ivory palmette terminal ornament; , palm-tree, from relief at koyunjik . assyrian winged monster or griffin (a. after. p. & c.) . . . . . details from phrygian tomb-facades: a, of "midas"; , doghanlou (a. after p. & c.) . capital from neandreia: proto-ionic . doorway from persepolis . persian details: a, architrave and cornice from a tomb; . palm ornament; c, stairway parapet; d, column-base, all from per- sepolis (a. after p. & c. and ward) . volutes from persepolitan capital . ahuri-mazda, from a relief . cretan column . cretan frieze ornament . cretan painted ornament: rosettes and vitruvian scroll (a. ufter p. & c.) . fret or key pattern, knossos . late minoan vase (a. after engraving) . marine plants, from a sarcophagus found at gortyna (a. after p. & c.) . ornaments from cretan terra-cotta ossuary (a. after p. & c.) . upper part of column, tholos of atreus . mycenaean bowl; basketry motives . mycenaean frieze ornament xv list of illustrations pagi . mycenaean nature forms: plants, squid, dolphin . mycenaean pottery spirals tb . cuttle-fish, from a vase . scale ornament from tiryns . mycenaean motives: a, b, heart forms; e, branched spiral (a. after f. l.) . o, current scroll, tiryns; , vase ornament, mycenae .... . plant forms, mycenae pottery (a. after f. l.) . squids, mycenae pottery . a mycenae button . detail from wall band, tiryns (a. after p. c.) . a, gold inlay, spirals on sword; , from bronse stele: both from mycenae . a, mycenaean vase; , from bronze tripod, athens . mycenaean ornament in alabaster (a. after p. c.) .... . rosettes: a, tiryns; b, mycenae (a. after p. c.) . a, mycenaean plant; , egyptian palmette . ivy band, mycenaean pottery . from a phenician silver platter . from a mycenaean silver cup . phenician silver: palmettes and griffins . a, e, phenician palmettes; b, greek vase ornament . cypriote oenochoe" (a. after w. h. g., in arch. rec.) .... . detail from cypriote sarcophagus from amatbus, in met. mus. . . cypriote lotuses (w. h. g. in arch. rec.) . cypriote bronte stele (a. after w. h. g.) . cypriote stone stele in met. mus . cypriote lotus, checkered (w. h. g. in arch. rec.) . cypriote ornaments . phenician vase from jerusalem (a. after p. c.) . detail, cypriote vase from ormidia, in met. mus. (a. after p. c.) . cypriote vase ornaments; nature forms, a, goose and lotus; , astarte (?) and plants; e, fantastic flower (a. after p. c.) . lotus-and-bud borders from rhodian and melian vases ... . greek vase, fine period, in royal museum, naples (pho.) . . a. carved anthemion band, from erechtheion, athens (pho.) . . greek palmette ornament; early vth century b.c. (a. after lau.) . anthemion band, typical linking by spirals, compared with typi- cal assyrian linking . typical geometric ornament elements . typical nature form-elements . typical architectural forms . carved rinceau, temple of apollo at didyme, near miletus: from base of column (a. from pho.) . types of greek vases: a, aryballos; , lekythos; c, rhyton; d, alabastron; i, i, hydria; /. krater; e, g. amphora; h, ointment box; k, kylix (a. after meyer) xvi list of illustrations page . geometric or dipylon vase, from museum of sevres (a. after j.) . rbodian vase, sevres museum (a. after jacquemart) .... . single and double frets . guiuoche, from painted molding a. wave or current scroll . anthemion with branding scrolls » . types of anthemion patterns . types of anthemions . types of the lotiform motive . vine pattern, from vase . elementary rinceau on pottery . lotus-and-bud origin of egg-and-dart motive . apulian vase; sevres museum (a. after jacquemart) .... . detail from handle of apulian vase . painted molding ornaments . painted ceiling panel from parthenon, (g. k. h. after meyer) . . ill . carved egg-and-dart and water-leaf . details from north door of erechtheion: a, cantilever or bracket; , rosette . corinthian capital, temple of zeus, athens . triple guilloche on torus of an ionic base . foliage capital, from aegte . branching scroll and covering-leaf; from erechtheion . . . . . painted terra-cotta anteflx; athens . acanthus (or aloes?) on steles . acanthus and burdock leaves . acanthus: a, a. mollis; b, a. spinosus . corinthian capital from basse (phigalaea) . corinthian capital from "tower of the winds," athens . . . . . detail of etruscan terra-cotta cresting (a. after a. p. t.) . . . details from terra-cottas in campana collection, louvre (a. after a. p. t.) . . borders or edgings of "campana" terra-cottas (a. after a. p. t.) . part of an etruscan terra-cotta pilaster; lilies (a. after kachel) . etruscan pilaster cap. (a. after dunn) . bronze mirror and jewels (a. after meyer and ward) .... . roman decorative system: hall of baths of caracalla (denk- maler der kunst?) . roman arch and columns, from arch of titus . niche cap from baalbek (a. after durm) . scroll from temple of vespasian, in villa aldobrandini .... . typical roman moldings . ionic capital with corner volutes . corinthian capital, temple of mars ultor (a. after d'espouy) . . composite capital in lateran museum . two pilaster caps (meyer) . a modillion xvii list of illustrations . restoration of cornice-of basilica ./emilia (from photograph of original drawing by r. h. s my the) . order of temple of castor and pollux; photograph of cast in metropolitan museum. new york . restoration of arch of constantinej photograph of model in metropolitan museum, new york . two standing acanthus leaves . varieties of acanthus leaf detail (a. after dunn) . . . . . pilaster scroll nests: a, late roman, from an old french litho- graph; b, fragment in villa medici, from cast in columbia university . roman rinceau and scroll nest, from forum of trajan, in lateran museum (a. from pho.) . candelabrum in vatican (meyer) . two rosette types . rinceau from temple of sun (a. after a french drawing) . . . three roman anthemion ornaments . ceiling panels from arch of titus, baths of caracalla, and basilica of constantine . dolphins, from an etruscan terra-cotta (meyer after kachel) . . . bucranes and festoon or swag (meyer) . stucco relief from tomb in via latina (pho.) . stucco relief from house exhumed in , now in museo delle terme, rome (pho.) . mosaic floor pattern, from pompeii . detail of floor mosaic from villa italica near seville (a. after pfeifer) . roman marble vase in naples museum (pho.) . roman marble vase, from cast in metropolitan museum, new york . details from a bronze vase and jewelry, perhaps etruscan . . . under side of a vase in the "hildesheim find," now in berlin ("workshop") . roman grotesque; detail of relief from forum of trajan in lateran museum (a. from pho.) . pompeiian ionic capital (a. after watt) . pompeiian moldings (a. after mazois and zahn) . carved rinceau, from a tomb in pompeii (a. from pho.) . . . . painted wall, third period (pho.) . painted wall, fourth period (pho.) . stucco relief from stabian baths (pho.) . pompeiian floor mosaics (a. after zahn) . mosaic fountain in casa grande, pompeii (pho.) . marble table supports from house of cornelius rufus, pompeii (pho.) . candelabrum and table leg (a. p. t. and meyer after botticher) . end of a sarcophagus in s. apollinare in classe, ravenna (c. u.) . interior (detail) of s. lorenzo fuori, rome (pho.) xviii list of illustrations page . floor mosaic in s. m. in trastevere (from a french drawing) . . . byzantine veined wainscot (journal of r. i. b. a., ) . . . . apse-head mosaic in s. clemente, rome (pho.) . ornaments in mosaic: a, from st. john lateran; b, sta. maria in trastevere . pulpit detail from sta. maria in ara coeli, rome (ward) . . . pulpit details from s. lorenzo fuori, rome (racinet) .... . detail of cloister arcade, st. john lateran, rome (pho.) . . . . mosaic on annular vault of sta. costanza, rome (pho.) . . . . detail of order, tomb in palace of diocletian, spalato . . . . . capital with impost block, san vitale, ravenna (a. from pho.) . corinthianesque capital, s. apollinare nuovo, ravenna (a. after dehli) . basket capital, s. apollinare nuovo (c. u.) . byzantine surface carving: above, from hagia sophia; below, from st. sergius ("kuchuk aya sofia") . frieze from st. john studios (emir akhor j ami) . byzantine acanthus molding, from an abacus . anthemion ornament from ravenna . anthemion cornice from st. mark's, venice (v. e. macy) . . . . byzantine crosses and anthemions: above, left, from hagia sophia; right, from civic museum, venice; below, from ra- venna . acanthus leaves and rinceaux, from bishop's palace, ferentino . vine border from carved pluteal in san vitale, ravenna . . . . detail from fig. . peacock openwork panel, torcello (pho.) . carved interlace from spalato (pho.) a. carved interlace from st. mark's, venice . openwork panel in san vitale, ravenna (pho.) . basket capital from st mark's, venice (pho.) . guilloche pattern from hagia sophia (meyer) . end of a sarcophagus in s. apollinare in classe, ravenna (c. u.) . openwork window filling, sta. maria pomposa (pho.) . . . . mosaic, detail from tomb of galla placidia, ravenna (pho.) . . . ivory throne of bishop maximian in cathedral of ravenna (pho.) . the crown of charlemagne (ward) . fabric in bamberg museum (bayet) . syrian carving: a, from tourmanin; , from bakouza .... . russian (georgian) and armenian carving, chiefly from a litho- graph by gagarin . details of marble inlays on flank of cathedral of pisa .... . mosaic altar front from ferentino (pho.) ....... . detail from facade of san michele, lucca (pho.) . false window, san stefano, bologna (pho.) . lintel of a door, san guisto, lucca (pho.) . pavement detail from baptistry of florence (pho.) . interior of cathedral of monreale (pho.) xix list of illustrations page . capitals from cloisters of cathedral of monreale (pho.) ... . painted cuflc inscription, palermo (gen.) . detail from bronze doors of cathedral of monreale by bonnano . arcaded cornice from s. martino at palaia (a. from pho.) ... . wheel window of church at altamura (pho.) . portal of church of san zeno, verona (pho.) s . lombard carved "monsters": above, capital from church at aurona; middle, symbols of st. john and st. mark on pulpit in s. stefano, bologna; below, from san ambrogio, milan (a. after osten and de dartein) . one bay and detail, st paul-trois-chateaux (a. after revoil) . . portal of church at carrenac (pho.) . portal st. jean of cathedral of rouen (pho.) . capital from cathedral of angouleme (pho.) . shafts and figures, west portal of chartres cathedral (pho.) . . . caps and arch carvings, st. pierre d'aulnay (pho.) . double capital, st martin des champs, paris (pho.) . . . . . romanesque iron knocker (pho. of cast in trocadero museum, paris) . baseo with spurs . late french romanesque capital (c. u., zetsche) . carved rinceaux, from mantes (above) and vaison (below) . . . acanthus leaves from portal of church at avallon . carved rinceau, avallon . double rinceau, notre dame, paris (a. after v.-le-d.) . . . . romanesque ornaments (hauser) . carved anthemion bands, church of st. aubin at angers (a. after cahier et martin) . . . grotesque, from church of notre dame, poitiers . leaf motive on a tile, st. omer . corinthianesque capital, lincoln cathedral (c. u.) . capital from st. peter's, northampton (c. u.) . ornaments from doorway of iffley church, oxfordshire (rick- man) . beak or bird's-head molding . interlaced arches (hauser) . anthemion ornaments: above, from- st. savior's, southwark; be- low, from hereford cathedral . celtic initials: q, from an italian periodical; o, from lindisfarne gospels (o. j.); s, from book of kells (a. after sullivan) . . . various interlaces (racinet, etc.) . cover of st. patrick's bell (ward) . one quarter of cover of molaise gospels (ward) . capital from gernrode . capital from church in wurttemberg (gen.) . doorway from abbey of heilsbronn (hauser) . capital from tarragona (gewerbehalle) . capital from tarragona (gewerbehalle) xx list of illustrations page . norwegian carving: . a, from church at stedye; , unidentified r& ess isftimtme dagger-handle. lbj ew £oland\ikiiild"molive.itj aori sp^>rhead.id-bpuanface-nwliiei . daskelry forma sto.ut. fkrmian animal motivei. , maori andhawaiian carvings. bra- zilian qmssasketry, singularly like ffis l /^^si^ ^"sj<»/ many found on south v^y p ^ ^ ^ american pottery; while {^) ^a^^f^^ in figure , a, b, c, and h fumm/wl representa' |j *tvs>y/ l\ tions of marine plants and animals reveal an fio. . mycenjean pottery, spirals „ , instinct i or the observa- tion and imitation of nature, of which traces are found in cretan art, and which later, in greek art, flowered into the superb sculpture of the periclean age. besides the architectural forms already referred to, the motives characteristic of mycenaean ornament are the zig-zag (figure ), spiral (fig. ); the run- ning scroll; a heart-shaped motive (figure ) perhaps converging towards the cuttlefish (figure ); the rosette, both carved and painted (see figure ); the double-branched volute recall- ing the lotus trilobe (figure , c); a peculiar variant of the guilloche (or the current scroll?) shown in fig. , a and in the detail of figure ; and a number of unnamed mo- tives, e.g., the imbricated pat- tern from tiryns in figure . a somewhat similar motive in a linear repetition on vases, suggests an inverted egg-and-dart (figure , b). fio. . a, current scroll, tiryns; b, vase ornament, mycenae. aegean and asiatic figs. and show various na- ture-forms, apparently derived from marine life; fig. is a vase from ialyssos bearing a squid as its chief ornament. the cuttlefish squid, dolphin (?), and sea-weed are common, besides many forms like those in figure , d, figs. and , impossible to identify. on the so-called "mycenae buttons" —thin plates of gold stamped or repousss in low relief, appears the peculiarly mycenaean motive of a band winding in and out around fl°- . plant -fobms, h j j j. mrcenje potteby. small eyes or round dots, with ex- cellent decorative effect (fig. ). the lotus and the multiple scroll, so common in egyp- fio. . satrna, on mycenaean vases. tian decoration, appear frequently, as in a slab from a tomb-ceiling in orchomenos, in the band from a wall- * figured in p. & c, "histoire de l'art"; sturgis, "history of architec- ture," vol. i, ; tarbell, "a history of greek art," page ; marquand, "greek architecture," page . a history of ornament fio. . a my cenje button. painting in tiryns (figure ), the ornament from a mycenaean sword shown in figure , a, and the mycenaean stele b. the spiral also ap- pears in other forms, as in figure , page , on the base a and in the bronze work detail b (from a tripod in athens; its mycenaean origin is problematic). in figure we have rosettes from tiryns and mycenae obviously de- rived from cretan prototypes like those in figure . figure shows a mycenaean double-rosette frieze ornament in alabaster very similar to the tirynthian ex- ample of figure , both being nearly identical with the cretan example in figure . figures , and exhibit other mycenaean nature-forms. in figure , a is a common mycenaean plant form (see also fig. ) which it is interesting to compare with the egyp- tian lotus-pahnette b. phenician ornament. during the decline of iegean art, from b.c. on, the phenicians were developing and extending their commerce and industries. this presumably sem- itic people, occupying a narrow strip of the syrian coast, north of palestine, were the mercantile car- riers of the ancient world, with prosperous colonies along the mediterranean shores, of which carthage became the chief. they were traders and imitators rather than fio. . painted wall- pattern, tibyns. figxm \hg.w.cypriotejtvma sarcophagus fiojizq/prioti lotuses a history of ornament originators in art; they carried and exchanged, and freely counterfeited, egyptian and assyrian or babylonian wares and stuffs. the detail from a silver tbe. _ ■ tin . ifi mi.imm fio. . mycenae spiral all-overs; a, gold inlay on sword; b, bbonze stele. platter in figure is plainly an imitation of egyp- tian work. sidon was for a long period under egyp- tian rule. the phenicians were skilful weavers, dyers and bronze- workers. solomon's temple at jerusalem was largely of pheni- cian workmanship, and the ac- counts in i kings, vii, - and i chronicles iii, -iv, prove the phenicians of b.c. to have been capable of cast- ing large objects of "brass" (bronze), such as the columns "jachin" and "boaz" and the huge "laver" borne on twelve oxen. distinctive phenician ornament motives are few. fig. . cypriote stone stele. ^gean and asiatic the most characteristic is a species of palmette springing from the concave side of a voluted crescent (figures , , a, c), derived from the assyrian pal- mette with horns, converging with the phenician crescent, symbol of the goddess astarte. it persists into greek art of the fifth century b.c. appearing as a vase band-mo- fig. . cypriote lotus, from vase. parthenon. the exact tones of the colors used in a, & and c, owing to the faded condition of such vestiges of color as still ex- ist. modern restorers usually represent them as some- what brilliant (plate vi, - ): perhaps they were less intense than these representations would indicate. with the development of the ionic style in the sixth and fifth centuries, carved ornament assumed greater importance and took on increased richness and variety, which reached the highest point of splendor in the alex- andrian age, especially in asia minor, and gave birth in the fourth century to a variant form, the corinthian, in which the capital of the column was the most impor- tant and ornate feature (plate vii, ). the carved egg-and-dart and "water-leaf" molding ornaments in a history of ornament and some of its details betray the influence of early pro- totypes in wood. its distinguishing features are the slender columns adorned with twenty-four flutings separated by narrow fillets and standing on molded bases, bearing capitals formed by spiral volutes con- nected by a horizontal band; the doubly or triply banded architrave, unbroken frieze, and cornice without mu- tules, often (especially in asia minor) adorned with dentils and invariably crowned by a cymatium (plate vii, ). as already remarked, carved ornament took the place of painted ornament on the moldings and on other parts, although color was still used as a subordi- nate element to enhance the decorative effect. the carved anthemion was used with fine effect both on flat bands and on the high cymatia of the cornices (plate vii, , ). carved rosettes, "cantilevers" or brackets (figure ) and other enrichments also occur. the style reached its highest magnificence in such splendid asiatic monuments of the fourth century as the apollo temple at didyme near miletus, the artemision (temple of diana) at ephesus and the mausoleum at halicarnassus. in the variant form known as the corinthian, which was in time, especially under the romans, developed into a distinct order, the column was made still more slender, and the capital, more than a diameter in height, was composed of one or two rows of acanthus leaves under coupled volutes which supported the corners or homs of a molded abacus (figure , page ; plate vii, , ). employed at first only for small decora- tive structures like the choragic monument of lysicra- greek ornament, ii tes, it was later applied to propylaeas (eleusis), shrines or treasuries (epidaurus), and later even to the colossal temple of zeus at athens ( b.c.). carved orna- ment was in these buildings carried to the furthest limit of elaboration known in greek art, as in the three- branched finial of the lysicrates monument ( b.c.), shown in plate vii, ; the capitals from eleusis ( b.c.), the rinceaux on column-bases at didyme (fig. , page ), and later under roman rule, the frieze and cornice of the temple of zeus at aizanoi. painted details. in the decoration of moldings with color, the object in view was to emphasize the profile by means of re- peated motives of the general character of the egg-and- dart or u-motive, modified in outline to suit the profile (figure ). flat surfaces, such as the corona of a cornice or the edge of a doric abacus, were often painted with a fret, though the wave, the guilloche and the anthemion-band were also often used, both on terra- cotta and on marble (plate vi, , ). the an- themion also figures in beautiful symmetrical patterns in gold on a blue ground in the ceiling-panels or coffer- ings of the pteroma or peristyle of the parthenon and other buildings (fig. ), recalling by their grace and freedom of line the finest of the black-on-red vase decorations. acroteria, antefixae and stele-heads were in the earlier examples painted, in the later ones carved; the anthemion was the almost exclusive ornament used on all these, sometimes combined with the acanthus-leaf as a subordinate detail (plate vii, , , ). a history of ornament carved details. in nearly all the carved ornament we may trace the imitation and elaboration of painted ornament derived primarily from pottery-decoration. let us first con- sider the moldings. five chief motives occur in their decoration by carving: the bead-and-reel for small bead-moldings; the egg-and-dart on convex profiles; the first and fourth are carved elaborations of the painted molding ornaments described above as them- selves derived from pottery-motives, or from pottery directly; the bead-and-reel is an importation from asia minor and may have been derived, via asia minor and persia, from the egyptian papyrus-bundle molding. all these carved ornaments were designed and executed with extraordinary skill and care, and their beauty and perfection have seldom been approached and never sur- passed in later ages. apart from the beauty of their decoration, moreover, the greek moldings are remark- able for the refinement of their profiles, composed of curves as subtle and delicate as the silhouettes of the the "water-leaf" on cyma-reversa moldings; the guil- loche on torus moldings (fig. ); and the an- themion on the fro. . carved triple gutlloche on torus of ionic base. high ionic cyma- tium or crown- molding. all but greek ornament, ii greek vases. it was the greeks, indeed, who first dis- covered and developed the artistic possibilities of mold- ings in architecture. the unvarying egyptian com- bination of the bundle-torus and cavetto or gorge was effective but monotonous, and neither in assyrian nor in persian architecture is there apparent any sense of the beauty of effect inherent in moldings of varied pro- file artistically combined. the ionic capital. the origin of this peculiar architectural feature, with its twin spiral volutes and lateral "bolsters," set above a carved echinus and supporting a molded abacus, has been a subject of much controversy. as in so many other cases, it was probably the result of convergence of more than one line of development. the volutes can be traced back to the branching voluted forms of as- syrian (see ante, fig. ) and iegean art, and finally to the trefoil-lotus of egypt. this seems to have blended with reminiscences of primitive "bracket" caps used on asiatic wooden columns, and a wooden origin is further suggested by the slender proportions of the shaft and its setting on a well-marked base. the oblong voluted bracket cap was apparently combined with what seems to have been originally an independent form of capital—a crown of one or two rows or rings of leaves like "oves," clearly derived from nature and not from the egg-and-dart motive, toward which, however, it con- icf. w. h. goodyear, "grammar of the lotus," and his article in the "architectural record," vol. ill, no. , "the lotiform origin of the ionic capital." also in perrot and chipiez, "histoire de l'art dans fantiquetev' vol. vii, seq. a history of ornament verged to form the carved echinus of the ionic capital. one form of this foliated capital, shown in fig. , is probably a prototype of the high bell or basket of detail. the high necking adorned with a carved an- themion is peculiar to this one building (plate vii, ). the carved anthemion. this was, next to the capitals, the most characteristic motive in ionic decoration. its origin in the anthemion bands of painted vases has already been explained. the technic of carving brought about a number of modifications of detail, such as the ridging and furrow- ing of the stems, leaves and scrolls, the elaboration of the "lotiform" motive (plate vii, ), and the intro- duction of the acanthus leaf (or in some cases apparently the leaf of a thistle or aloe) to mask the junction of fluted scrolls where they branch (figure ). the most celebrated example of the carved anthemion is that which adorned the north and west sides of the erech- theion, and which is much like that on the neckings of the columns (figure a; plate vii, ). the commonest application of the carved anthemion band was to the high cymatium of the ionic cornices. the later-developed corin- thian capital. fig. . cap from aeg.e. the fully developed cap- itals of the erechtheion are among the most elegant forms in classic architecture, and were executed with extraordinary perfection of greek ornament, ii there are many fragments of such carved cymatia of great beauty. one of these on the acropolis at athens shows a bird perched upon its scrolls—an almost isolated instance in greek art of a purely naturalistic represen- tation in the midst of a bit of formal ornament. another and quite a different use of the carved an- themion is found in carved marble antifixa? and acro- teria which replaced the earlier painted terra-cotta and painted marble. plate vii, , illustrates a marble antefix (or possibly a ridge-cresting unit) from the parthenon, which may be compared with fig. , a painted acroterium or antefix of terra-cotta, and the stele-heads in plate vii. stele-heads. closely related to the acroteria and antefixae are the stele-heads, i.e., the upper ends or finials of memorial, sepulchral or votive stones. apparently the earliest sepulchral steles were topped with a gable- formed finish suggesting the end of a sarcophagus, and adorned with a painted anthemion springing from a nest of acanthus leaves. this combination perhaps recalled an ancient prac- tice of planting an acan- fio. . painted tebba-cotta thus or similar plant a"im' no a history of ornament (aloe?) on the flat top of a square or round stele (fig- ure , page ). with the increased vogue of carved decoration the painted stele-heads disappeared and the carved type was elaborated into a remarkably beautiful design, especially in the fourth century, to which belong the fine examples in plate vii, , . the acanthus. the acanthus is a common plant in greece and italy, related to the common burdock (fig. ). the variety known as the acanthus spinosus of- fers, by its formally regular growth and its crisp, crinkly and prickly leaves, excel- lent suggestions for decorative convention- alization (figure , fio. . acanthus leaf (above); &). the date of its bukdoc* (below). first appearance m greek ornament is uncertain; it began to be quite fre- quently used, however, by the latter part of the fifth century b. c, as a covering leaf to mask the branching scrolls of carved anthemions, as in the example from the erechtheion (figure ). these earlier examples suggest the thistle and the aloe quite as much as the acanthus; but this may be merely fortuitous resem- blance. another early example is shown in fig. , probably the earliest type of the corinthian capital— found in the ruins of the apollo temple at phigalaea greek ornament, ii (bassae) in attica, but now lost. with the develop- ment of carved ornament the leaf was more and more highly elaborated, almost always in association with volutes or spiral scrolls, chiefly applied to one or an- other of four decorative uses: the anthemion-band, the corinthian capital, carved stele-heads, and the carved rinceau. the last three were executed with especial richness of detail in the alexandrian age. the corinthian capital this, the richest of all capital-types, developed only gradually into the final form which the romans adopted fig. . early corinthian capital fio. . capital from "towbb op from ba &£. the winds," athens. and made their own. contemporary with the over- elaborate "lysicrates" example in plate vii, , we find the much simpler form from the "tower of the winds" shown in fig. . a capital from the tholos of epidauros shows an approach towards the later form from the temple of zeus at athens (figure ), which dates from b.c., and furnished the prototype for the a history of ornament roman corinthian. in this, sixteen volutes spring in branching pairs from eight caulicoli or leaf-nests, to meet in pairs under the centers and corners respectively of the hollow-curved and molded abacus, each caulicolus rising from between two upright acanthus leaves of the upper or second of two rows of eight leaves each which encircle the bell or core of the capital. the plain bell- type of fig. suggests a possible imitation of egyp- tian palm-capitals; but its late date makes this explana- tion of its form less probable than that of derivation by simplification from the more elaborate contemporary type of epidaurus or the lysicrates monument. very complicated variations were produced in eleusis, while at didyme near miletus, at priene, and in some other examples, piers or pilasters were capped with the curi- ous form shown in plate vii, . the greeks never developed any type of modillion cornice for the corinthian entablature, which remained essentially ionic in character. the rinceau. the foliated scroll known by this french name does not appear, at least in carving, until the alexandrian age. its origin in painted ornament has already been suggested (see ante, page ); in carved ornament it appears to be an extension of the branching scrolls which accompanied the anthemion on some ionic cymatia, on the anthemion band of the erechtheion (plate vii, ) and on the more elaborate types of stele-heads (fig. ; plate vii, , ). in these examples the scrolls branch only twice or thrice in diminishing repetitions. greek ornament, ii on the gable of one of the splendid sarcophagi from sidon in the museum at constantinople, twin scrolls branch symmetrically from the center to form not a subordinate feature, but the entire decoration, of the pediment (plate vii, ). the choragic monument of lysicrates was capped by a superb finial of triple branching and interlaced scrolls, springing from three scroll-arms which spanned the flattened dome of the roof, and supporting presumably the prize tripod awarded to the choir-leader lysicrates (plate vii, ). it was an easy and natural step from these to a con- tinuous line or band of equal branching scrolls, with an acanthus-leaf wrapping and partially masking the several branchings. the base of one of the colossal columns of the didymseon near miletus (the temple of the didyma?an apollo) bears a superb carved rin- ceau, the earliest and almost the only example of a com- plete continuous rinceau in greek architecture (figure , page ). the greek rinceau generally lacks the reversed calyx or cup-flower at each branching that char- acterizes the roman type; the acanthus-leaf is simple, thick and rather flat; the scrolls end in a sharp point in- stead of a rosette or flower, and are formed by deeply channeled bands and not by round stems like the roman. it was reserved for the romans to develop and elaborate this type, as will appear in a later chapter. but al- though the rinceau as a continuous band-motive is rare in greek carved ornament, it appears frequently as a limited motive after alexander's time, and several elaborate examples of its use are in the british museum from eleusis. a history of ornament other carved motives. carved scales representing tiles adorned the dome- like roof of the monument of lysicrates, and the gabled cover of the great "alexander" sarcophagus (so-called) from sidon, now at constantinople. the latter also has a finely executed frieze of a grapevine with a con- tinuous waving stem. the carved fret appears occasion- ally, as on a marble funereal monument in the form of a vase, in athens. lions' heads are carved to decorate the spouts for discharging roof-water through the cymatium, as on the parthenon (plate vii, , ), the temple of apollo at delos and other examples. the griffin was carved in the round as an acroterium orna- ment, and in relief on either side of a central tree or vertical motive—an oriental device already referred to (see ante, page ). beautifully executed examples of these grotesques or monsters adorned many of the capitals of the temple of apollo at didyme. the fine marble table-supports found in pompeii were very probably of greek workmanship, but will be noticed later under the head of pompeiian ornament (see page ). relation to roman ornament. greek ornament may be said to have finally passed over into and been absorbed by roman art. with the conquest of the greek states, greek artists became the servants of roman wealth and power with all the roman love of magnificence, and contributed greatly to the decorative beauty and refinement which are so often greek ornament, ii present in roman works. in asia minor the greeks retained in considerable measure their independence of taste under roman rule; the remarkable crocket orna- ment from the frieze of the temple of zeus at aizanoi, of the time of the antonines, as well as many other de- tails of this and other temples and tombs in asia minor, exhibits the greek originality of design. the capitals of pilasters of the arch of hadrian at athens («>. a.d.) reveal something of the same originality, crispness and independence of the imperial formalism. southern italy and sicily abounded in works and prod- ucts more greek in style than roman; and the entire decorative system of pompeii, in all its branches, dis- plays a grecian delicacy, fancifulness and charm, which are due either to the employment of greek artists, or to the large element of greek blood in the popula- tion of all magna graecia. doubtless the walls of pompeii represent the last corruscation of the greek mural painter's art, and they are the only examples which have come down to us. books recommended: anderson and spiers: architecture of greece and rome (london, ).—baumeister: denkmaler des klassischen altertums (berlin, - ).—botticher: die tektonik der hellenen (berlin, - ).—chipiez: histoire critique des orders grecs (paris, ).—durm: antike baukunst (in handbuch der architektur series, darmstadt, ).—l. fen- ger: dorische polychromie (berlin, ).—a. flasch: die polychromie der griechischen vasenbuder (wiirzburg, ). —furtwangler and reichhold: griechische vasenmalereien (munich, ).—j. i. hittorff: restitution du temple d'empedocle a selinonte, ou l'architecture polychrome chez les grecs (paris, ).—g. kachel: kunstgewerbliche vorbuder a history of ornament aus dem alterthum (karlsruhe, ).—a. maeauand: greek architecture (new york, ).—lau: die griechischen vasen (leipzig, ).—m. meurer: die ursprungsformen des grie- chischen akanthusornamentes, etc. (berlin, ).—stuart and revett: antiquities of athens (london, ); also french and german editions of the same.—tarbell: history of greek art (new york, ).—l. vui/liamy: examples of ornamental sculpture in architecture . . . greece, asia minor and italy (london, ).—w. r. ware: greek ornament (boston, ).—j. c. watt: examples of greek and pom- peiian decorative work (london, ).—j. r. wheeleb and h. n. fowler: handbook on greek archaeology (new york, ). chapter ix etruscan and roman ornament, i the roman genius. with roman ornament we enter upon a new chapter of the history of art. roman art grew up under condi- tions almost the opposite of those under which greek art developed. instead of a group of rival and fre- quently hostile states, allied only by race, religion and language, we have in the case of the romans a single state comprising peoples of many races, languages and religions, welded together into a powerful and highly organized military empire. lacking the prevailing artistic and philosophical instincts of the greeks, the romans possessed on the other hand a remarkable genius for organization and administration, and a spirit at once practical and progressive. with the growing wealth and power which followed upon their long career of conquest, the romans developed, somewhat late in their national life, a taste for luxury and splendor. the arts which flourished under the direction of these tastes were chiefly of foreign origin, though they took on in time a distinctively roman character. the romans became a nation of mighty builders and engineers, and architec- tural decoration and all the decorative arts that are concerned with personal comfort and luxury were car- a history of ornament fig. . etruscan terra-cotta cresting. ried to a remarkable, and in some cases an extraordinary, degree of elaboration and splendor. sculpture, on the other hand, was never a characteristic medium for the fig. . etruscan details. etruscan and roman ornament, i expression of the roman genius. roman ornament lacked somewhat of the refine- ment and restraint of the greek, but was more varied and more flexible. it was eminently adapted to the purposes which it had to serve, and is well worthy of study for its elegance and versatility of design. etruscan ornament. before the conquest of the fios. us and . emus- greek states introduced greek can teria"c tra borderb- art into roman life, the romans depended mainly upon the etruscans for such forms of art as their modest requirements called for. this singular people, whose race-origin and early history are still shrouded in ob- scurity, possessed an architecture of their own betray- ing a certain remote kinship with the greek, but crude and undeveloped artistically. their frequent use of the arch, and the character of their ornament, so far as it appears in their works in bronze and gold, sug- gest an asiatic influence, chiefly phenician, possibly via carthage. their ceramic art, especially in its later phases, was based on greek models. the campana collection of terra-cotta reliefs in the louvre, belonging to the first century b.c, show much technical cleverness in adapting greek pictorial subjects, and even the painted scroll ornaments on late greek and campanian vases, to modeling in relief. the ornamental borders a history of ornament fig. . detail of a pilaster. of these reliefs retain a curiously asiatic character (fig. ). in figs. - a number of typical etrus- can forms are shown. painted terra-cotta ornaments, such as were used on the wooden superstructures of their temples, are preserved in the museums of italy; they strongly resemble others found in pompeii and southern italy, which are very likely of etruscan work- manship. these represent the highest development of etruscan architectural decoration, but plainly exhibit their greek derivation. the cap shown in fig. illustrates the crudity of native etruscan details and etruscan and roman ornament, i strongly suggests a phenician or ori- ental influence. the etruscans were skilful bronze- founders, and ap- pear to have prac- tised also at an early period the art fig. . etruscan pilaster cap. of spheirelaton or sheet-metal hammered into relief on a base of carved wood. the fine bronze chariot in the metropolitan mu- seum at new york appears to be a product of etruscan work of this sort of the seventh century b.c. etruscan jewelry and filigree were often of great beauty— brooches, pendants, chains, etc., of gold sometimes set with gems. some of it is possibly, however, of greek manufacture (fig. ). the pottery of etruria was un- important compared with that of greece. the most interesting of its products were black vases fio. . a history of ornament modeled in relief (bucchero nero), but these display lit- tle pure ornament except flutings on the body. it ap- pears to have no relations with the prehistoric black pottery of the so-called terramare and villanova pe- riods. the greek conquests. the conquest and absorption of the greek colonies in southern italy and sicily in the late third century b.c., and of the states of greece proper, ending, with the fall of corinth ( b.c.), in the establishment of the greek province of achaia, not only made the roman cam- paigners familiar with the marble magnificence of the greek cities and the beauty of greek art, but brought to rome itself countless treasures of that art and hosts of greek artists and artisans. roman architecture un- derwent a gradual transformation, which accompanied and expressed the change in the roman taste. mum- mius, the conqueror of corinth, was in all matters of art a boorish ignoramus; sulla, who sixty years later captured athens in the course of his final campaign against mithridates, was a cultivated admirer of literature and art. as a result of this process of education and growth in refinement of taste, the etruscan city of rome, built of brick, terra-cotta and timber, was transformed into a greco-roman city of stone and marble. the greek orders, radically modified in detail, were adapted to new uses, in combination with etruscan forms of column and etruscan types of plan and the etruscan arch and asiatic vault, and entirely new decorative forms and effects devised in connection with new constructive ma- etruscan and roman ornament, i terials and processes. sculpture, mostly by greek artists, received new decorative applications; the arts of the bronze-founder, the modeler in stucco and the mural painter were developed rapidly to a high pitch of excel- lence ; and the modest alphabet of greek ornament-forms was expanded into a remarkably rich and varied system of decorative devices. in all these arts it is not always possible to distinguish between true greek handiwork and that of the roman imitators, who were probably in many cases etruscan by race. the decorative system. the romans created for architecture wholly new requirements, applications and uses. to meet these they devised equally new methods and processes of con- struction, employing combinations of brick, rubble, cement, concrete, stone and marble never known before. the roman genius for organization and system asserted itself in the erection, by means of the vast armies of unskilled labor at their disposal, of ingenious and stu- pendous structures, massively built of coarse materials, and producing novel effects of scale and grandeur made possible for the first time by the use of the arch and vault. this massive construction of coarse materials re- quired a decorative skin or dress, both internally and ex- ternally, of finer material, such as stucco, mosaic, marble wainscot or veneer, or facings of cut stone, with mold- ings, panels, friezes, cornices, carving, sculpture and the like, besides such structural features and adjuncts as columns, porticoes and porches, which must be wholly made of the finer materials. this system was funda- a history of ornament mentally different from that of egyptian or greek ar- chitecture, in which stone or marble was the only ma- terial, and temples the chief subjects of architectural design. in these the decoration, other than painting and free sculpture, was of necessity an integral part of the construction, or at least incorporated in it or exe- cuted directly upon it. with the roman system, a large part of the ornament was, equally of necessity, ap- fiq. . tepidarium, baths of caracalla. plied ornament, executed after the completion of the massive structural frame or core of the building (fig. ). this is the system which has prevailed, and must prevail, in all styles and in all regions in which the chief building-materials are coarse or undecorative in them- selves, or in which, even where stone and marble abound, the exigencies of building require the use of the com- moner and coarser materials for the main fabric of the edifice. it is the system in general use in modern prac- tice, and is entirely reasonable and artistically proper, in spite of the objections raised against it by certain etruscan and roman ornament, i critics who assail it as "false" and "illogical," because the construction is not identical with the decoration but is concealed by it. but solid masonry of cut stone or of brick and terra-cotta, and in some cases wooden or steel construction, afford the only opportunities for the greek or gothic system in which construction and decoration are, or may be made, inseparable; and even with these the interior must in most cases be concealed by plaster, wainscot, tiles, ceilings and the like. the analogy of the skin of human beings and animals affords a justification from nature, of the roman, byzan- tine and modern system, in its decorative concealment of the internal organism and construction, revealing only the general masses of the structure. by the roman system, the unskilled labor of hordes of slaves, soldiers and peasants could be turned to account in the heavier work of construction, and great numbers of vast buildings be erected with comparative rapidity, leaving the decorative work to be later executed by artists and artisans, upon this structural core. the roman genius for organization and adaptation, guiding and directing these artists, who were chiefly foreigners, at least in the earlier periods, developed new forms of decoration, in which conventional ornament took the place of figure sculpture. the principal types of decorative work thus developed were: ( ) the decorative use of architectural features, such as columns, entablatures, pediments, moldings, panels and ceiling-coffers; ( ) carved ornament in ex- traordinary variety; ( ) figure-sculpture, such as groups in pediments, free statues on columns or entablatures in a history of ornament certain classes of structures, and reliefs in panels, spandrels and other defined spaces; ( ) the chromatic effects of colored marbles and granites in columns, wainscoting and pavements; ( ) mosaic of glass or marble in floors and ceilings; ( ) stucco- relief in delicate patterns, often com- bined with ( ) mural painting in brilliant colors, and ( ) bronze work on ceilings, in grilles and doors, and in decorative adjuncts like tripods and candelabra. architectural features. fio. . roman arch (abch of titus). rpjjg remarkable variety of the roman buildings and structural devices lent itself to a corresponding variety of decorative ef- fects in which the purely decorative use of various structural features played a prominent part. pilas- ters and engaged columns with their entablatures, pedi- ments over doors, windows and niches, recessed arches and deep ceiling-panels were the chief elements of this pseudo-structural decoration. the combination etruscan and roman ornament, i of the arch—adorned with its archivolt and keystone —with engaged columns carrying entablatures (fig. ) was the most important of these decorative de- vices, and has been in more or less constant use ever since roman times. in the later imperial age, and particularly in the provinces, as at spalato in dalmatia fig. . niche-cap, baalbek. and in syria at baalbek and palmyra, there was, under the antonines and later emperors, a remarkable increase in the variety of these decorative applications of archi- tectural features. curved and broken pediments, colonnettes on brackets, spirally fluted columns, and niches with shell hoods are among the features most widely used. some of these works have a singularly modern look, as if of the palladian renaissance, which, indeed, independently re-invented many of these devices thirteen hundred years later (fig. ). i this use of structural forms as mere decoration has been condemned as "sham" and "false" design by certain purist critics, who contrast it un- favorably with the "truthful" architecture of the greek and gothic builders, a history of ornament conventional ornament. in developing the details of this system the romans were obliged to employ greek artists and to begin with greek models for the most part. the greek orders, the greek fret and anthemion, molding-ornaments, rosette, acanthus-leaf and rinceau, were appropriated, but not without radical modifications. with such stupendous fig. . fragment from temple of vespasian, in villa aldobbandixi. aggregations of buildings as the romans raised in their cities both in italy and abroad—structures often many- storied and of vast dimensions—figure-sculpture was out of the question as the chief decoration, not so much on account of its enormous cost as because it would have been wasted and ineffective. carved conventional ornament, on the other hand, with its repeated units, (fig. ) enriches such buildings without requiring but even in greek architecture there are analogous "shams," like the pseudo-structural paneling of the greek pteroma-ceilings, while the useless false gables and the rich wall-traceries of gothic art are perfect examples of the purely ornamental use of forms primarily structural. the fact is that in all advanced stages of art the structural forms of earlier stages have been similarly turned to decorative account etruscan and roman ornament, i that semi-isolation and that nearness to the eye which are essential for the best effect of figure sculpture. plastic ornament was carried by the romans to the highest perfection of appropriate design, of rich effect, and often of exquisite execution. moldings were combined and profiled with the greatest care, though the profiles were generally less subtile than those of the greek moldings. in monumental buildings nearly all fig. . roman moldings. a, simple water leaf; b, enriched water leaf; c, d, acanthus leaf enrichments. the moldings were enriched by carving, the ornamenta- tion being more elaborate than in the greek prototypes —sometimes, indeed, too minute for the best effect, but almost always appropriate and beautiful (fig. ). the general effect of all this decoration was one of great dignity and splendor. the striving for magnifi- cence sometimes led to offenses against good taste, and the execution is occasionally coarse, but such offenses are rare, and beauty, refinement, delicacy and charm frequently characterize even the grandest works. a history of ornament the orders. the most conspicuous adornment of roman buildings was effected by the use of columns and pilasters with their entablatures, in one or more of the so-called "five orders"—the tuscan, doric, ionic, corinthian and composite (plate viii). in reality there are but fig. . roman ionic capitals. three, the tuscan and doric being mere variants of one type and the composite and corinthian of another. upon their so-called doric column, which was really an enriched and refined form of the etruscan (tuscan) column, the romans placed an entablature derived from that of the greek doric order, with its triglyphs and mutules. the ionic was but slightly varied from the greek ionic type of asia minor. the capital occurs in two forms: one following the greek model, but with a straight band between the volutes, on the front and etruscan and roman ornament, i rear faces, instead of a depressed curved band (see plate viii, ); and the other with four double volutes at the angles of the abacus, in order to make the four faces of the capital alike; this is sometimes called erroneously the "scamozzi ionic" (fig. ). the corinthian, an elaboration of the greek corinthian but fw. . corinthian capital, temple of mars ultor. with a special type of cornice, is the really distinctive roman order. with the greeks it had been a mere variant of the ionic; the romans developed its capital into a type generally recognized as one of the most beau- tiful ever devised. in its most perfect examples, as in that of the pantheon, the temple of castor and pollux and the temple of faustina, it consists of two rows of erect acanthus-leaves surrounding and concealing the lower two-thirds of a bell-shaped core on which rests a a history of ornament molded abacus with concave sides. the upper part is concealed by sixteen spiral volutes which spring in branching pairs from eight caulicoli or leaf-nests, set between the eight leaves of the upper row. these volutes meet in eight pairs under the four corners of the abacus and under rosettes at the centers of its four sides (fig. , figure ; plate viii, , ). the details of this type are endlessly varied; in late examples ani- mals and human figures sometimes take the place of the fig. . modillion. corner volutes. the composite capital, having volutes only at the angles, and larger than in the corinthian, may be considered an inferior variant of the corinthian, though sometimes very splendidly carved (plate viii, , ; figure ). it somewhat resembles a four-faced ionic capital placed upon the lower part of a corinthian capital. pilaster caps show a greater variety of design than capitals of columns (plate viii, ; figure ). to these improvements upon the greek order they added that of a special type of base, an elaboration of the attic base, consisting of two tori separated by two fig. .—composite capital (lateran museum, rome) fig. .—restoration or cornice, basilica ^emilia (from drawing bt r. h. smtthe) , a history of ornament scotias and a single or double bead. in late examples these moldings were all carved, reproducing at the base something of the elaborate richness of the capital (plate viii, , , ). but the romans not only perfected the greek corin- thian capital and base; they developed also a new type of cornice which completed the corinthian as a distinct order (figure , page ). this was accomplished by the simple but epoch-making device of introducing modillion brackets beneath the corona and above the bed- mold of the typical ionic cornice. the modillion (fig. ) was a completely new architectural in- vention. the recently excavated fragments of the basilica iemilia ( b.c.) show a primitive form com- posed of a mutule decorated on the under side with a reversed scroll (figure ). the modillion of the maison carree at nimes ( a.d.) somewhat resem- bles this type; the more perfect type is shown in plate viii, . variety in the roman orders. it is frequently asserted that the romans reduced their orders to a purely mechanical system of mathe- matically formulated dimensions for each part. this assertion springs from a blind acceptance of the rules laid down by vitruvius (or of the later formulae of vignola and other italian renaissance writers) as if they represented the actual historic practice of the romans. in reality nothing could well be further from the truth. there are no two examples of any of the this appears to have been used over an ionic order. etruscan and roman ornament, i orders from different buildings that are alike, either in general proportions or details. the roman doric is at least as varied as the greek doric, and the variety in corinthian capitals and entablatures is simply aston- ishing. there was, no doubt, throughout the imperial age a tendency towards uniformity in certain general features and proportions, but this never hardened into cast-iron formulae, and the beauty and vitality of roman ornament are largely due to the variety and individual- ity of the designs of different buildings, and of different times and places. decorative uses of the orders. in roman architecture columns were not only used for their original function as true structural supports in porticoes and colonnades, but also, with their entab- latures, for decorative purposes, by engaging them in the walls, which were thus architectually divided into bays and stories. in arcaded structures the columns, apparently engaged into the piers between the arches, were in reality parts of the piers themselves, acting to that extent as buttresses; but their chief function in such buildings was esthetic, not structural. they were expressive as well as decorative, emphasizing to the eye the lines of vertical support and of concentrated thrust of the building, while indicating externally the internal structural divisions. at the same time they broke the surface of the edifice into rectangular panels or units, outlined by strong lights and shades, in which the arches were effectively framed. the romans also invented the pilaster, a flattened a history of ornament replica of the column, used as a wall-decoration, and as a respond behind free-standing columns, as in tri- umphal arches and forum walls. over columns so placed in front of pilasters the entablature was made to project in a salient block, while between the columns it was set back nearly to the wall-face, thus producing the much criticized ressaut or "broken entablature." when this projecting block and the column below it together serve as a pedestal for a statue, as in the arch of constantine (figure ), they serve at least a real esthetic function. in other cases the order thus used becomes a purely factitious decoration, unexplained to the eye, as it supports nothing even in appearance. the shafts of columns and of pilasters were sometimes fluted, sometimes smooth. when monolithic shafts of polished granite or marble were used, as was general in the later imperial age, the decorative splendor of the colored material took the place of enrichment by fluting, as a characteristic roman practice. the use of pedestals, by means of which an order of smaller-scaled parts could be used for a given height of story, was another distinctively roman device to add to the flexibility of the orders (figure ). books recommended: see list at end of chapter x. chapter x boman ornament, ii carved ornament. in this field roman art surpassed all previous styles in the variety and splendor of its achievements, and originated types which have persisted through all the centuries since. the beauty of the corinthian capital and entablature has already been alluded to, as well as the richness of the roman carved moldings. roman fig. . typical acanthus leaves. friezes, bands and panels were adorned with a like rich- ness of conventional carving. practically the whole of this ornament was based on greek prototypes—the an- a history of ornament themion and rinceau supplying the motives for the greater part of it. if we add to these the rosette, festoon or garland, and the use of symbolic and grotesque forms, and note that the acanthus-leaf in an endless variety of modifications, was worked into every possible detail, we have the key to the greater part of this ornament. but with these few fundamental motives the roman artists developed a quantity and variety of designs which for richness and appropriate- ness of effect and extraordinary flexibility of application have never been surpassed. some of it is heavy and over-wrought; but the beauty and refinement of the great majority of examples entitle them to high praise. the acanthus. this constitutes a type rather than a particular form of leaf. as compared with the greek type, it is less massive, less pointed, more minutely modeled; it suggests a larger, thinner, more flexible and more complex leaf, with well-developed "eyes" at the bases of the lobes and "pipes" or ribs curving from these to the base of the leaf (fig. ). the stand- ing leaves in the figure may be compared with the natural acan- thus mollis in figure , a (p. ). there are many leaves in nature which are divided in much fro. . types op acanthus. i or "swag," as it is often called by english writers. roman ornament, ii the same way, and the romans varied the carved type almost ad infinitum, so that it recalls various leaves, and modern writers have given them fanciful names accord- ingly—the "olive," "palm," etc.—though in each case we have a purely conventional variation of the type. fig. shows a few of these variants. the acanthus was used (a) as a standing leaf in capitals and on some moldings; (b) as a molding orna- ment (fig. , c, d); (c) as a nest or bunch of leaves from which to start a rinceau (plate ix, , , ; fig- ure , fig. ); (d) as a caulicolus or wrapping- leaf to mask the branching of the scrolls (plate ix, ; figs. , ); (e) as an ornament around the stems of candelabra and the bellies of vases (plate x, ; fig. ); (f) as a conventional plant to alter- nate with or replace the anthemion (plate ix, ), and (g) to form the petals of a rosette (fig. ; plate ix, ). all these applications may be studied in plates viii, ix and x. the rinceau. the origin and development of the rinceau have al- ready been traced in greek ornament (pages ). the roman version of it became the most important of all roman motives, and has been perhaps the most pro- lific of all historic ornament-forms except the lotus. a round stem, springing from a nest of acanthus-leaves (figs. , , ), branches into scrolls alternately winding upon one and the other side, each terminating, not in a point as in the greek type, but in an elaborate flower or bunch of leaves (figure , page ). each a history of ornament branching is concealed by an elaborate caulicolus or wrapping-leaf, which springs from a calyx-like cup- flower at its base. such spaces as would otherwise be fio. . rinceau, fobum op trajan. left bare are often filled with subordinate scrolls and tendrils, and in rare instances animal life is introduced in the form of birds, mice and insects (plate ix). fio. . rinceau, from temple of the sun. while some examples of the rinceau are heavy and overcrowded, as in the example from the temple of the sun (fig. ), others are remarkable for their deli- roman ornament, ii eately handled relief and exquisite details (fig. ). there is the greatest possible variety of effect both in the composition and detailed treatment. the rinceau was used (a) for friezes and bands; (b) for pilasters, either single, filling the whole width of the pilaster-panel, or doubled symmetrically on either side of a central axis (figure ); (c) on flat surfaces or panels of almost any form symmetrically repeated on either side of a vertical axis. examples are shown in plate ix. the anthemion. the preceding examples illustrate the applications of the acanthus listed under c and d (page ); fig. and plate ix, , illustrate a group of forms based on the anthemion. while some examples resemble quite closely the greek carved anthemion, others depart widely from the type, constituting a new and original ornament form. ceiling decoration. the wooden ceilings of the basilicas and private houses have perished. vaulted ceilings were decorated in either two ways: by stucco ornament, modeled in re- lief and painted, or by paneling in deep "coffers" or "caissons." these were derived originally through greek architecture from wooden ceilings framed with intersecting beams. in the pantheon they appear to have been hewn out of the solid brick masonry of the dome, long after its original completion, its rows of panels fitting but indifferently over the eight-fold a history of ornament divisions of the architec- ture below. an early and elegant example of vault-paneling is seen in the soffit of the arch of titus ( a.d.). the panels were in most cases simple geometric forms— squares, octagons, "loz- enges," etc.; the sides of each caisson were molded and the fields of the pan- els adorned with splen- didly carved rosettes or with mosaic patterns, or else left plain (fig. ). ceiling decoration in stucco is treated in a later paragraph (page ; see figures and ). figure sculpture. figure sculpture played a far less important part in the decoration of roman buildings than in the greek monuments. the reasons for this have been already touched upon (page ). nevertheless the splendid decorative value of the figure was not ignored, but was availed of in many decorative reliefs of high artistic excellence. the romans were especially successful in the sculpture of symbolic grotesques and of infant fig- fio. . roman carved anthemi- ons. roman ornament, ii ures (genii and amorini). by a grotesque is meant an artistic combination of heterogeneous nature-forms, as in fig. , where an infant figure is provided with wings, and terminates in a superb acanthus scroll in place of legs. the festoon or "swag" and garland, bound with fluttering ribbons representing sacrificial i fro. . fillets (figure ; plate viii, , ); the bucrane or ox-skull, likewise a sacrificial symbol (plate ix, ); the dolphin and steering-paddle symbolizing neptune and water (figure ); the imperial eagle, and trophies of arms and armor, are common in roman decorative art. the most beautiful of roman relief decorations are perhaps the charming reliefs modeled in plaster on the ceilings and walls of houses and thermae, as noted in a later paragraph. a history of ornament wall decoration. three methods were employed: marble veneer, paint- ing and stucco-relief. both in the richer private houses and palaces, and in the thermae, basilicas and temples, the lower part at least of the interior walls was wains- coted with slabs of variegated marble, so set as to pro- duce symmetrical patterns of veining. this practice was probably introduced from asia minor, where marble abounds, although it has been contended with a good deal of force, that it came from alexandria together with the sort of mosaic called opus alexan- drinum. the origin is less important than the result. a special emporium was established on the tiber for the traffic in marble, of which enormous quantities were required for columns, wainscots and pavements. the ancient wall-incrustations have mostly disappeared, torn away to supply materials for medieval and even renais- sance buildings. one important example, however, remains; the interior wall of the pantheon, up to the main cornice, still retains for the most part its original lining, in perfect condition. this style of decoration has survived in the early christian basilicas and byzan- tine churches (see chapters xii and xiii). stucco relief. it was the romans who first, with the aid, most prob- ably, of greek artificers, developed the artistic possibili- ties of work in stucco for interior decorations, especially of vaulted ceilings. this art had evidently reached see "transactions of the royal institute of british architects," vol. ill, new series; . fig. .—stucco relief, from a roman house (in museo delle terme) roman ornament, ii a high state of perfection by the middle of the first century a.d. the substructions of the golden house of nero (who died a.d. ), and of the baths of titus, built in on the same site, together with numerous examples in pompeii, which was overwhelmed by the eruption of a.d., afford abundant proof of the bril- liance, delicacy and originality of the roman stucco- work of this time. the roman stucco, made in part with pounded marble and thoroughly slaked lime, was extraordinarily fine and durable. it was applied only as fast as it could be worked into decorative form, and molded partly by mechanical means, partly freehand, while still wet. the area to be decorated was laid off in panels of various geometric forms, outlined by mold- ings of delicate profile, often enriched with eggs-and- darts, leaves or other ornaments. the panels were then adorned with paintings, with glass-mosaic (as in the baths of caracalla), or more frequently, with relief arabesques or figures modeled in the stucco; and it is in these last that the highest skill was manifested. the exquisite charm of this work, its delicacy of low relief, the freedom and dash of its execution indicate artistic ability and taste of a very high order (figures , ). important examples of various handlings of this material are: at rome, tombs on the via latina, the substructions of the baths of titus and of nero's golden house, ruins on the palatine and fragments in the musec delle terme from a house uncovered in near the villa famesina, in excavations for the new tiber embankments; at pompeii, the baths of the forum (the tepidarium), stabian baths and a few a history of ornament examples in private houses. the great majority of these date from the first century a.d., after which a more robust and monumental decoration of walls and ceilings appears to have gradually displaced this charm- ing but minute and intimate form of art. the ornaments of stucco in low relief were often com- bined with painting, on walls as well as ceilings. the labyrinth of piers and vaults under the ruins of the baths of titus on the esquiline (part of them belong- ing to the golden house of nero) are doubly interest- ing because they furnished the models from which raphael drew his inspiration for his remarkable painted stucco-relief decorations in the loggie of the vatican, and less directly, giulio romano and giovanni da udine for those in the villa madama. painting. the above examples, especially those from the house uncovered in , and others in the villa of hadrian at tivoli, and in the so-called casa di livia on the palatine, prove the substantial identity of style of the mural paintings in the capital with those at pompeii, with only such differences of quality as one might expect between the capital and a provincial town, somewhat hastily rebuilt after the earthquake of . this phase of roman ornament will be treated in the next chapter, devoted to pompeii, on account of the great number and importance of the pompeiian examples. pavements. the floors of all important buildings were of marble roman ornament, ii fig. . detail, floor, mosaic, in villa italica, seville. or mosaic. marble was used in large panels of various colors in circles, squares and simple geometric forms; but as with the wains- coting, most of these pavements have dis- appeared to provide materials for the floors of christian basilicas. that of the pantheon may be in part original, and fragments of the floor of the basilica julia have also been preserved. mosaic floors were paved with minute tesserae or roughly squared fragments of colored marble, tile or other ma- terial, set in patterns usually of a plain field with a decorative bor- der in the larger rooms, though in smaller rooms all-over patterns were not uncommon (plate xi, , , ). outside of rome, in asia minor and in other remote provinces as well as in pompeii, elaborately pictured floors were executed in tesserae of variously colored marbles. the most fa- mous example from the house of the faun in pompeii is now pre- fio. . ornaments, bronze and gold. a history of ornament served in the naples museum (see page ). figure illustrates a floor pattern of "swastikas" from a house in pompeii. there are some fine examples in the museum of constantinople. fig. shows a detail of the mosaic floor of a roman villa near seville, spain. furniture and utensils. whatever furniture was of wood has perished; but the more important and permanent objects in the equip- fio. . under side of silver vase, hildesheim treasure. ment of houses were of marble and bronze, and of these, together with the smaller utensils and furnishings in bronze, we have many examples in the various museums. as, however, the great majority of these are from pompeii, they will be briefly discussed and illustrated in the following chapter on pompeiian art. plate x and figures , and figs. , show illustrations fia. .—roman vase (from cast in metropolitan museum, new york) roman ornament, ii of pedestals, candelabra and vases, mostly in the muse- ums of the vatican and of the capitol at rome and in the museo nazionale at naples. large vases of marble, elaborately sculptured, were used in the decoration of villas, presumably in the gardens, serving most probably as vases for the planting of flowers, vines and small trees or shrubs. in these, roman decorative art reached a high degree of excellence and supplied models which the renaissance artists of italy and later of france imitated with success but hardly surpassed. the museum of the louvre possesses a colossal marble vase with spiral flutings and figures in relief, and other ex- amples are found in the capitoline and vatican museums at rome and the nazionale at naples (figures , ). convex and concave flutings, acanthus-leaves and guilloches, the vine and grotesques are the most com- mon adornments of these fine vases, the grace of whose outlines is fully equal to the splendor of their decoration. goldsmith's work and jewelry. skill in jewelry was shown by the etruscans, who may have furnished the greater part of the jewelers even in imperial times. the character of the later jewelry—bracelets, brooches, pendants and pins—does not differ essentially from that of the earlier etruscan work except in greater variety of form. the bronze and silver mirrors deserve notice for the beauty of the handles and backs. the famous hildesheim treasure, discovered in at hildesheim, germany, com- prising gold and silver bowls, platters and other vessels magnificently decorated with figures, vines and orna- a history df ornament ments in relief, reveals the same excellent taste and fine workmanship observable in roman works in bronze and marble (plate x and figure ). fig. . books recommended: as before, anderson and spiers, baumeister, jacobsthal, kachel, vulliamy. also, f. albertolli: fregt trovati negli scavi del foro trajano (milan, ); ornamenti diversi an- tonini (milan, ); manuale di varii ornamenti . . . e fra- menti antichi (rome, - ).—j. bxtehlmann: the architecture of classical antiquity and the renaissance (new york, ).—g. p. campana: antiche opere in plastica (rome, ).—j. durm: baukunst der etrusker; baukunst der romer (darmstadt, ).—g. ebe: die schmuckformen roman ornament, ii der monumentalbauten (leipzig, ).—h. d'espouy: frag- ments de varchitecture antique (paris,' - ).—p. gus- man: l'art decoratif de rome (paris, ).— s. hessel- bach: vergleichende darstellung der antiken ornamentik, etc. (wiirzburg, ).—j. de marta: l'art etrusque; archeol- ogie etrusque et romaine (paris, n. d.).—strack: baudenk- maler roms. (berlin, ).—c. h. tatham: etchings (london, ).—taylob and cresy, antiquities of rome (london, ).—thierry: klassische ornamente.—c. uhde: architecturformen des klassischen altertums (berlin, n. d.); also an edition in english (new york, ). consult also various volumes of the engravings of pibanesi (to be found only in the larger libraries); the volumes of l'art pour tons (paris, —) ; and the printed transactions of various archaeological societies, for valuable material. chapter xi pompeiian ornament the decorative art of pompeii was a provincial phase of roman art differing from that of the capital in cer- tain aspects, precisely as in dalmatia, in syria and in north africa, local conditions modified the detailed forms of decorative expression while the roman impress was nevertheless over all. it is pervaded by a spirit of grecian delicacy and refinement, due to the strong greek element in the population of southern italy; but there are details on the other hand which smack of the etruscan. the importance of pompeiian art is due to its wonderfully complete preservation by burial under the scorice after the eruption of vesuvius in a.d. its progressive excavation since has laid bare the aspect, life and art of a provincial south italian city of the first century, while all other roman cities (except herculanum, still buried) have suffered complete trans- formation by successive rebuildings through eighteen centuries. two facts must be kept in mind in all study of pom- peiian art: first, that the majority of houses and many of the temples and public buildings were, at the time of the eruption, newly built to replace those destroyed by the earthquake of a.d.; and that in consequence pompeiian ornament of the earthquake they were mostly low buildings, un- like the more lofty and monumental architecture of most other cities; secondly, that they represent the relatively early roman art of the first century, previous to the time of domitian, and not of the later and more splendid imperial age. yet in the matter of decoration there is less difference of style than one would expect from the work of the same age in the capital (e.g., the fig. . ionic cap, corner volutes. house of livia and the frescoes in the museo delle terme) or even of a later period as seen in the villa of hadrian. the ornament of pompeii will be discussed under four heads: ( ) architectural detail; ( ) mural decora- tion; ( ) mosaic; ( ) furniture and utensils. it will be seen that in all these divisions, while the motives are essentially roman, there is a freedom, a lightness of touch and delicacy of treatment, which suggest greek workmanship, and which are probably due to the per- sistent strain of hellenic blood in the population of all southern italy. a history of ornament architectural detail. the orders were handled with great freedom, whether executed in cut-stone, or, as more frequently, in rubble or brick finished in stucco. the doric order was often of the greek rather than of the roman type; the ionic capital usually had doubled corner-volutes and a very slight projection or width as compared with both greek and roman types (fig. ), and the corinthian capital was considerably varied, both in the number and character of its leaves. the roman type of acanthus is not found, a more bluntly crinkled leaf being pre- ferred. the doric columns had no bases, those of the other orders often lacked plinths; the moldings differed from the roman, in having profiles more varied and delicate, with an almost feminine refinement (fig. ). the entablatures have for the most part perished. the few fragments that remain intact show the same characteristics in varying from the fashions of rome and in refinement of detail. a common pompeiian feature was the filling-up of the lower part pompeiian ornament of the flutings of stuccoed columns, to prevent the chipping and marring of the fragile arrises; sometimes a convex "flute" or bead inserted in this portion protected without quite filling the fluting, and this has become a common decorative device of modern architecture. all this pompeiian architecture of rubble and stucco was embellished with color, of which traces still remain. even capitals were painted and the carved and molded details were adorned in like manner. one house is known as the casa dei capitelli colorati, the house of painted capitals, because of the perfect preservation of the color on its stucco or cement capitals; but it was originally but one of hundreds so adorned. figure illustrates the elegance of detail in a carved rinceau in stone. mural decoration. in this field the pompeiian remains are unrivaled. the chief means of decoration was by painting on stucco; the use of rich marbles, whether for construction fig. . carved pompeiian rinceau. a history of ornament or wall-incrustation, although increasingly common in rome for at least a half century before the destruction of pompeii, was not common in the provincial town. the surprising thing is that within less than sixteen years after the destructive earthquake of a.d. , this town should have been rebuilt with such elaboration of elegance in its painted decorations as the remains have exhibited. many of the paintings have been trans- ferred to the royal museum at naples, but the wealth of decoration still remaining in place is astonishing, in quality as well as quantity. some of the more recently excavated houses—that of queen margherita, of the vettii, and others, equal or surpass the splendors of the museum (figures , ). four well-marked periods or styles (for doubtless they overlap independently of period-limits) are recog- nized. the first, supposed to be etruscan or cumaean, and dating as far back as b.c., is that of walls simply divided into panels of different colors with occasional painted imitations of marble wainscot. the second, called the greek, supposed to have been introduced about b.c., is distinguished by the earliest use of pictures copied from greek originals, or reminiscences of them, the subjects being mostly taken from greek mythology. a very simple type of painted archi- tectural embellishment accompanies many of these pic- tured decorations: painted columns, bases and entab- latures serving to mark off the wall-divisions. the third and fourth styles are roman or pompeiian; both are found in the houses rebuilt after the earthquake, and both are characterized by a light and fantastic archi- pompeiian ornament tecture painted in a conventional perspective, with slender columns as of gold, with extraordinary entab- latures, pediments and balconies, giving vistas of the clear sky above, and enclosing pictures of varied sub- jects, sometimes of large size, or simpler colored panels in the centers of which float airy figures of nymphs, cupids and other mythological beings, in the fourth or florid style this "dream" architecture is still more complex, attenuated and fantastic than in the third, and the simpler and more obvious wall-decorations of friezes and arabesques play a smaller part in the scheme. in the painted details, apart from pictures and the architecture, there is a great variety of conventional patterns for bands of ornament; a remarkably elegant treatment of the rinceau motive, in varied colors on black or red (plate xi, ); and a corresponding inter- pretation of carved pilaster-arabesques in painted arabesques of yellow and other colors on a red, green or dark background (plate xi, - ). much of this decoration has the character of mere artisanship, but it is extremely clever artisanship, and one has no right to call for the higher qualities of art in the decorations of ordinary houses. the technic of the painting has been much discussed; but it is now quite generally believed to have been executed in true fresco on the wet plaster, at least in the majority of examples; and then touched up and many of the details worked over, in the finer examples with encaustic painting. in this last process the pig- ments were mixed in melted wax on a hot metal palette a history of ornament and applied with a hot iron instrument instead of a brush. stucco relief. this form of mural decoration, as applied both to walls and ceilings, has already been touched upon (see ante, page ). a comparison of the examples from rome and pompeii respectively, discloses no funda- mental difference of style or even quality between the work in the two cities. the most notable examples in pompeii are those in the two chief baths—the thermae of the forum and of stabii. in these we have a rinceau frieze, delicate panel-moldings, ideal or mythological figures, tritons, winged figures, dolphins and the like, and free-hand arabesques, all treated with an animation of design, a freedom from mechanical repetition and hardness, and a delicacy of handling, worthy of greece and of the capital, and surprising to find in a relatively small provincial city (figure ; plate xi, , ). this and the roman stucco-work ought to be fruitfully suggestive to modern decorators, for its effects are full of charm, and yet not unduly costly or difficult to pro- duce. besides these interior decorations in low relief, there should be mentioned the decorations of the exteriors of buildings by stucco details molded upon a rough core of rubble or brick, and also the use of stucco for columns and capitals in place of stone. it is easy to criticize adversely this substitution of a fragile for a monumental i in the metropolitan museum of art at new york there are several sec- tions of wall from a villa at boscoreale, with decorations of the third period,—mostly landscapes of buildings and farms. fig. .—pompeiian stucco relief; from the stabian baths pompeiian ornament material in exterior ar- chitecture; but given a scarcity of marble and of good building stone with an abundance of soft tufa and of "pozzolana" for the making of cement- stucco; given also the ne- cessity of a rapid re- building of almost an entire town after the earthquake of , and it would be hard to imagine a more artistic and satis- factory result than the pompeiians produced in a few short years with rub- ble, stucco and paint. mosaic. fio. . mosaic floor patterns. mosaic floors were al- most all of opus grecanicum, laid in small tesserae of marble and other stone or even tile, in patterns which frequently suggest rug-designs. each floor has a bor- der and either an all-over patterned field (see fig. ), a central medallion, or a spangled field (fig. ; plate xi, , , ). the swastika appears in some of these. the chained dog with the inscription cave canem ("beware the dog") was a common decoration of the prothyrum or vestibule. the finer houses boasted elaborate pictures in color, made with very small tesserae, a history of ornament and in some cases, no doubt, copying parts or the whole of celebrated greek pictures. genre pictures and ani- mal subjects were common. the greatest and finest of fig. . table-leo (marble) and bronze candelabrum details. naples museum. all mosaic pictures was found in the house of the faun and transferred to the naples museum; it represents presumably the battle of issus, in a panel measuring pompeiian ornament over by feet, and probably reproduces some cele- brated greek painting in alexandria, from which city, after pompey's victory in b.c., a strong hellenic in- fluence was exerted on roman art. the portrait of alexander is unmistakable; the light and shade, fore- shortening, drawing and color are remarkable and the execution extraordinarily fine. mosaic was employed on walls as well as floors, though sparingly. a singular freak or novelty of design was the occasional combination of stucco-relief and mosaic. another use of mosaic was in the decoration of the entire visible surface of various edicules, such as shrines and niche-fountains (figure , p. ), upon which the most brilliant colors of blue, red and green were applied by the use of glass tesserae, and varied effectively sometimes by scallop-shells inserted in bands or lines. furniture and utensils. the excavations at pompeii and herculanum have thrown a light on the more intimate details of roman life not elsewhere to be obtained; not only by the paint- ings of scenes from daily life and by the sgraffiti or scribblings on walls, but even more by the great wealth of utensils, implements and furniture of metal and marble exhumed from the ruins and for the most part transferred to the naples museum. everything of wood and cloth was destroyed by the eruption, but marble and bronze and even iron were preserved by their burial in the volcanic ashes, and we have set before us the marble tables that adorned the atrium and peri- style, the fountains and marble vases or basins, the a history of ornament bronze couch-heads and frames, the candelabra and tri- pods of bronze, the braziers, water-heaters, mirrors, lamps, hair pins, fibulce or clasps, and innumerable other objects of metal. here again the greek refinement appears in all the details. grotesques are sculptured with consummate skill (fig. ); especially notice- able are the lion's paws terminating in human or in beasts' heads (plate x, , ) and the winged monsters on table-supports. the lightness and grace of the bases and fluted standards of tripods and candelabra suggest that from them in part came the inspiration for the fantastically slender columns of the wall-paint- ings (fig. ). it is interesting to compare these slender candelabra and tripods with the massively splen- did forms of roman candelabra in bronze and in marble in the vatican (see plate x). the pompeiian tombs and altars compared with the roman show a somewhat similar contrast in the detail, though less strongly marked; there is more reserve, less monumental bold- ness in the composition and in the detail. books recommended: mau, trans, by kelsey: pompeii (new york, ).— mazois: hes mines de pompeii (paris, ).—niccolini: he case ed i monumenti di pompeii (naples, - ).—presuhn: die neueste ausgrabvmgen zu pompeii (leipzig, ).— zahn: ornemens de pompeii (berlin, ); ornamente aller klassischen kunstepochen (berlin, ). chapter xii easly christian or basilican ornament it would be hard to point to two successive styles of architecture and ornament further apart in spirit and detail than those of imperial rome and early christian rome, yet they form no exception to the rule of style- development by gradual transition. this transition is for us obscured first by the widespread destruction of early churches in the east during the moslem conquests and in the west during the persecutions under dio- cletian, and also by the fact that the beginnings of chris- tian symbolic art in europe were made in the catacombs and not above ground, and were thus humble and incon- spicuous. but the christian artists were romans, working upon the basis of roman art traditions which, up to the legalization of christianity by constantine in a.d., were applied alike to secular and religious buildings. it was the predominance after that date of religious art employing a wholly new symbolism that most effectively differentiated the christian from the pagan imperial style. christian art began, then, nowhere as a consciously new art, but everywhere in syria, asia minor, egypt, italy and greece—as a phase of the existing local art. in the eastern empire, with constantinople as its center, a history of ornament religious architecture and decoration diverged rapidly under greek influence from the style of the west to become what we call the byzantine. in italy, with rome as its center, they took on the development com- monly called the early christian, or latin, or—from the resemblance of the churches to the secular basilicas of the empire—the basilican style. early christian art sepulchral. the beginnings of christian art are not, however, to be looked for in architecture. until the edict of con- stantine legalizing chris- tianity, its rites were, at least in the west, prac- tised in private, largely in secret, and the language of symbols took on in- creased importance where persecution so often fol- lowed open speech. upon the walls of the cata- combs, which served not merely as places of sep- ulture but also as meet- ing-places for worship, were painted scriptural scenes and symbolic com- positions: the good shep herd as a young man ^o.s . sarcophagus end, ravenna. carrying a lamb on his shoulder, in evident reminiscence of the classic herakles kriophoros; the fish, the letters of fig. .—detail, san lorenzo fuoki le mura fig. .—apse mosaic, san clemente basilican ornament which word in greek ox***) form an acrostic of the greek words for "jesus christ, son of god, savior"; the vine, in allusion to christ's saying, "i am the vine," and other like representations. later many other forms were added: the laharum—the standard borne by con- stantine's army after his victory of the milvian bridge, in both forms * and ;the letters i h s, the first three letters of the greek ihsoys, later taken to signify both iesus hominum salvator and in hoc signo (vinces), the words heard or seen by constantine in his vision at the milvian bridge; the cyress-tree, symbolic of the cemetery and hence of death and burial and finally baptism, which was regarded as the burial of the sinful nature; the emblems of the four evangelists —the ox for matthew, the lion for mark, the head of a man for luke, the eagle for john; angels and cherubs, funereal wreaths and festoons and finally the cross itself, equal-armed after the greek fashion, or with a long standard after the latin. sheep to represent the flock of the church; the paschal cup, the peacock and other emblems of various significations were little by little added to the list, and appear both in latin and byzan- tine art. it is somewhat remarkable that the cross does not appear until late; hardly at all before the latter part of the fifth or the early sixth century. many of the christian emblems were already familiar forms in roman pagan art. angels were but roman winged genii endowed with a new significance; the vine, origi- nally a bacchic emblem, became a christ-symbol; the wreath and festoon were transferred from the service i romans vii, . a history of ornament of roman sacrifices to that of christian burial. most of these forms were used at first with purely symbolic intent, having significance only for the initiated. in time, however, the symbolic intent, as always in the evolution of decorative art, because subordinate to the decorative: the symbol became a common ornament, multiplied and endlessly varied in the decoration not merely of sarcophagi (fig. ) and funereal chapels, but of churches, baptisteries, oratories and tombs. all the resources of mosaic, painting and carving were en- listed in their representation. figure sculpture alone remained for centuries undeveloped, largely in conse- quence of the hatred of pagan idolatry with which it was so generally associated in the popular mind. architectural ornament. early christian art in the west made little of archi- tecture. two types of building predominated, the basilican church and the baptistery. the first was a simple three-aisled hall with a wooden roof, a semi- circuliar apse for the clergy at the further end, and a transverse porch or narthex across the entrance-front. the two rows of columns which separated the broad cen- tral aisle or nave from the side-aisles, supported each a clearstory wall rising above the roofs of the side-aisles and carrying the lofty central roof: these walls were pierced with windows to light the nave. in the larger basilicas there were double side-aisles, and in some in- stances a transverse aisle, called the transept, as high and nearly as wide as the nave, crossed it directly in front of the apse. the arch forming the front of the apse basilican ornament was generally called the triumphal arch, though in tran- septal basilicas the name is applied to the great arch by which the nave enters the transept. excepting the half- dome over the apse, no vaulting was employed in these churches. the columns were taken from pagan ruins, and so indifferent were the churchmen to architectural regularity that the columns of the same row often dis- play a great variety of sizes and even different orders of capitals (figure ). this was partly due to the poverty of the churches during the gloomy centuries fol- lowing the fall of rome, but all the evidence points to a strangely prevalent indifference to architecture as an art, which the three great basilicas of st. peter, st. paul and sta. maria maggiore (all three originally built be- fore the final fall of rome) only emphasize by contrast. the builders of basilicas were chiefly engrossed with the applied decorations of their churches. even in this field, roman art remained almost stationary for centu- ries, depending largely upon byzantine artists for a part of this decoration. elements of latin ornament. the architectural ornament consisted of the following elements: (a) pavements of colored marble and hard stone, in a combination of opus sectile and opus alex- andrinum;* (b) marble sheathing or wainscot on the lower walls; (c) mosaic on the apse and its arch, on the« triumphal transept arch, and on the clearstory walls; rarely, in late examples, on the exterior of the front or hereafter s. and sta. will be used for san, santo and santa. * sectile = cut to shape; alexandrinum — of small geometric units. a history of ornament narthex and on cloister arcades; (d) the ornamentation of the fixed furniture of the church; and (e), the decora- tion by painting or otherwise of the wooden ceilings of nave and aisles. a. floor pavements. dates and periods are hard to fix and signify little in this field of design, as the style remained practically un- fio. . floor mosaic, san clehekte, rome. changed for centuries. the nave floor was commonly divided into rectangular panels by broad bands of colored marble in which were set guilloche patterns (fig. ) in opus sectile combined with alexandrinum. the panels were filled with field patterns of alex- andrinum surrounding discs or slabs of solid color (see plate xiii, ). porphyry, verd-antique, ser- basilican ornament pentine, and white and yellow marble were the usual ma- terials employed, and the resulting effects were rich and yet sober, indestructible, and soft in color-harmony. the round disks were cut from antique columns sawed into slices, and all the ruins of antiquity were a quarry for paving materials. this form of floor-decoration is probably the most effective ever devised. the contrast of the solid dark red or green of the disks with the sparkle of the minute patterns of alexandrinum and the sweeping curves of the huge guilloches surrounding them, produce a decora- tive ensemble in every way admirable. splendid ex- amples survive in the churches of sta. maria in trastevere, sta. maria maggiore, san lorenzo, san marco and san clemente. floors of this description were in vogue throughout the entire middle ages, in rome and its neighborhood and even in remote italy, as in the floor of the byzantine st. mark's church at venice, dating from the th century. b. marble wainscoting. this system of wall decoration, often called incrusta- tion, was inherited from ancient rome, but was used more extensively in the eastern than in the western churches. the roman basilicas have moreover been so often remodeled that nearly every vestige of their in- crustations has disappeared. exceptions are found in sta. agnese and in sta. sabina; in the latter the arch- spandrels are inlaid with formal conventional patterns. usually the practice was followed of symmetrically pair- ing slabs having similar veinings, as is shown in fig. a history of ornament fio. . byzantine wainscot. , a byzantine example from constantinople. this practice is common to the basilican and byzantine styles. c. mosaic. in this art, at least in that branch of it in which small cubes or tesserce of glass are employed to form pictures and patterns on walls and vaults (opus grecanicum), it is impossible to distinguish sharply between the byzan- tine and basilican or latin styles. greeks from con- stantinople doubtless were often employed to execute mosaics in rome, and were probably the originators of basilican ornament this form of christian art. by means of minute tessera? of glass "paste," pictures and patterns can be formed of any desired combination and gradation of colors, gold and silver effects being produced by gold- or silver-leaf imprisoned between two layers of glass paste fused to- gether. the deep blues, from lapis-lazuli to a soft green-blue, the rich reds, soft yellows and greens and brilliant gold and silver of this sort of mosaic made pos- sible a splendor of color far transcending any form of painting, and unrivaled in depth and intensity except by the later invention of stained glass. its magnificence appealed strongly to the taste of the early christian cen- turies, and its adaptation to pictorial representation fitted it to express that symbolism which the mental habit of the times demanded. accordingly there is more of picturing than of pure ornament, which is con- fined chiefly to narrow borders, often simulating jewels set in gold. it remained for the byzantines to develop the possibilities of mosaic in the field of pure ornament. the most important mosaics were in, or on, the apse- vaults, and represented such subjects as the kingdom of god by the symbolism of the shepherd and twelve sheep, or some like composition. similar subjects, with angels, adorned the spandrels by the apse arch, and the trium- phal transept-arch. the clearstory often bore pictures of saints, angels and apostles, and biblical scenes. among the finest of all latin mosaics are those of the apses of sta. pudenziana and sta. maria in trastevere, the apse and triumphal arch of st. paul without the walls (s. paolo fuori le mura) recovered from the ruins of the original basilica and incorporated in the modern a history of ornament reconstruction; of sta. prassede and sta. sabina, all at rome; and of the two san apollinare churches at ravenna (sixth century). of later date is the superb rinceau decoration in the apse-head of san clemente ( - ): an exceptional example of conventional ornament in mosaic in a basilica (figure ). apart from such applications of the rinceau, there were few distinctive ornament motives in the mosaic decora- fio. . early christian mosaic borders. tions. fig. shows two examples of mosaic bor- ders, a from the palace of st. john lateran, a mosaic of the eighth century; from the facade of santa maria in trastevere, both in rome. d. ecclesiastical furniture. the chief elements in the fixed furniture of the churches were the ciborium or baldaquin—the canopy over the altar and tomb of the saint; the altar itself; the choir-enclosure; and the two pulpits or ambones, affected respectively to the reading of the gospels and of the epistles, the former being adorned with a basilican ornament columnar candelabrum. the seats for the clergy were orig- inally simple steps of marble set around the apse, and the bishop's throne was apparently of very simple design. later the clergy- seats were removed from the apse or bema and the altar placed there in their stead, though the ciborium remained in its original position to mark tke tomb of the martyr or saint. all this fixed furniture was of marble, usually built up of flat slabs inlaid with opus alexan- drinum. the ciborium was a structure of four columns with a pyramidal roof; the altar a simple rectangular box or table of marble; the choir-enclosure a paneled marble parapet about three feet high; the am- bones, elevated reading-desks on either side of the choir reached by flights of steep stairs. the decoration of these simple forms was often very rich, especially of the pulpits and altar frontals (fig. ). it consisted of inlaid patterns of opus alexandrinum combined with disks and guilloches of sectile, in principle like the floor- mosaics, but finer in scale and execution. in the later work, the geometrical units of the alexandrine mosaic— triangles, squares, circular segments, etc.—were often of glass paste, producing much more brilliant effects than fio. . ara coeli, rome. a history of ornament the marble and porphyry units of the earlier works. it appears to have been first used in the spiral flutings of the gospel or easter column. this brilliant form of alexandrine work, whatever its origin, became espe- cially common in southern italy, and was practised there and in rome as late as the thirteenth century. it is found in the cloisters of monreale (twelfth century), fig. . mosaic details, pulpit in sax lorenzo fuori. in sicily, and in those of san paolo fuori and st. john lateran at rome (thirteenth century). rome became the center of an important school of marmorarii and of a great industry in' marble mosaic, and its artists traveled far to execute orders for church furniture and cloister- arcades. the family of the cosmati (from cosmatus or cosmas, grandson of the founder of the school), were especially noted for several generations, and their name is often applied to the combination of sectile and alex- andrinum which they used and developed (figs. , from ara coeli and san lorenzo rome. see chapter xiv). basilican ornament in the cloisters above mentioned, in the easter columns, and frequently also in the ambones (fig. ), twisted shafts or spiral flutings were used. the introduction of this form of column, theoretically inap- propriate for a support, into italian art, may be traced to the rich but ugly twisted column now in st. peter's at rome, brought in the sixth century from jerusalem, where it was believed to have been a part of the "gate beautiful" where st. peter healed the lame man (acts iii, - ). it belongs probably to the decline of roman imperial art, much later than st. peter's time. e. ceilings. not one of the ceilings of the earlier basilicas remains to us in its original form. it is unlikely that in churches resplendent with marble and mosaic the ceilings were as bare and barnlike as are to-day most of those which have not been entirely remodeled in comparatively re- cent times. we are, however, left to speculation as to their precise treatment. the painted open-trussed ceilings of several medieval churches of the eleventh and twelfth centuries (messina, monreale, san miniato near florence) show a somewhat similar treatment though belonging to different styles, which points to the existence of a strong ancient tradition (see chapter xiv). it is likely also that in some cases the trusses were concealed by a decorative ceiling of wood, paneled in coffers with rosettes, after the fashion of many greek and roman ceilings, and richly painted and gilded. but no such ceilings remain to our day. it may be, * destroyed in the earthquake of . a history of ornament however, that the splendid ceiling of sta. maria mag- giore is a reproduction or imitation of the original of the fifth century. vaulted ceilings were chiefly confined to baptisteries and tombs. the earliest of these are the dome over the central space and the annular vault over the encircling aisle of sta. costanza at rome, erected by constantine presumably as the tomb of his daughter constantia, but from early times used as a baptistery. the decorations of the dome have perished, but among the well-preserved mosaics of the aisle-vault are vintage scenes (figure ), apparently pagan, but here transferred to the service of christian symbolism; and geometrical pat- terns combined with small figure subjects. but in nearly all domical and vaulted buildings after the fourth century the latin and byzantine styles are one and the same, and the ornament of such buildings will be taken up in the chapter on byzantine art. from the preceding paragraphs it may be rightly in- ferred that the early christian builders were singularly lacking in architectural inventiveness. there is not a single structural form, not an architectural innovation, not an ornament of purely architectural character, that can be credited to their initiative. their art was sta- tionary and unprogressive, and contrasts surprisingly with the rapid progress and splendor of achievement of the contemporary byzantine art in the eastern empire. books recommended: bunsen : die basiliken des christlichen roms (munich, n. d.). —essenwein: ausgdnge der klassichen baukunst (in hand- buck der architektur, darmstadt, ).—a. l. frothing- fig. .—mosaic in vault of sta. costanza basilican ornament ham: monuments of christian rome (new york, ).— gerspach: la mosa'ique (paris, ).—gutensohn and knapp: derikmale der christlichen religion (rome, - ). —hubsch: monuments de varchitecture chretienne (paris, ).—portheem: uber dem dekorativen stil in der altchrist- lichen kunst (stuttgart, ).—von qttast: die altchrist- lichen bauwerke zu ravenna.—de rossi: la roma soter- ranea christiana (rome, - ).'—n. h. j. westiake: history of design in mural painting, from the earliest times to the th century (london, ). chapter xiii byzantine ornament in striking contrast to the architectural poverty of the latin or western ornament of the early church stands the architectural richness of the decorative art which grew up in the east roman or byzantine empire, and which was founded upon and largely dominated by the architecture. with the decline and fall of rome, the lamp of civilization passed to constantine's eastern capital on the bosphorus and into the hands of the byzantine greeks of thrace, macedonia, asia minor and syria. these greeks, largely asiatic, borrowing freely and impartially from classic greek, roman and asiatic sources, developed with singular rapidity in the fifth and sixth centuries new types of vaulted construc- tion and a system of decoration of remarkable original- ity and beauty, in which the oriental love of brilliant color and surface ornament was blended with the occi- dental appreciation of logical construction and pure form. this byzantine art culminated under justinian ( - ); invaded italy, especially after the byzantine conquest of ravenna; and spread through the entire extent of the byzantine empire. the decline that set in soon after the brilliant reign of justinian was a slow decline, so that we find this art still productive in the byzantine ornament eleventh and twelfth centuries. indeed, st. mark's at venice, one of its most brilliant works, dates from , while offshoots from the parent stem throve for cen- turies in the ecclesiastical buildings of russia and armenia, and later in the impressive mosques of the ottoman turks. leading characteristics. the byzantine system of design and decoration was in fundamental prin- ciple like the ro- man in its use of a decorative skin or veneer of marble, mosaic, or other fine material upon a structural mass or core of brick, con- crete or like coarser material. the chief difference, structur- ally, was in the use of the dome on pen- dentives in place of groined vaulting; fw- - detail raom spalato. and decoratively, in an entirely new and original treat- ment of detail. for the classic roman play of light and shade by means of relief carving and architectural features the byzantines substituted a system of decora- tion in color and surface-etching, reducing all surfaces as nearly as possible to unbroken planes or curves, sup- a history of ornament pressing all avoidable projections and recessings. mar- ble incrustations and pavements were used with even greater splendor than in rome, and all vaults covered with superb mosaics, or, when means were lacking for the more splendid adornment, with pictures in fresco on plaster. architectural ornament. such details of architecture as were inherited from classic roman precedent were subjected to a flatten- fio. . impost cap, s. vitale. ing process by which they lost all their strong reliefs, high lights and deep shadows. this process had begun as far back as a.d. in the palace of diocletian at spalato (fig. ), in another part of which one also byzantine ornament observes arches carried directly on columns, as in byzantine buildings. in the spalato entablature, by changes of profile and proportion the architrave has been exaggerated, the frieze reduced to a mere molding, the corona to a fillet, and the general profile of the cor- nice almost to a ° splay. in hagia sophia, the masterpiece of byzantine art, we find a similar treat- fio. . coainthianesaue cap, s. apollikare nuovo, ravenna. ment of cornices and moldings, while capitals, shafts, archivolts and all other features depart in an equally striking degree from roman models (plate xii, , ). impost blocks. the byzantines invented a new feature, the impost- block, to replace the bits of entablature which the a history of ornament romans in their vaulted buildings interposed between the capital and the spring of the vaulting. the byzan- tine impost-block, shaped like the inverted frustum of a pyramid (fig. ; plate xii, ) was decorated with monograms, crosses, lambs or other symbols, or sur- fio. . "basket" cap, s. apollinabe nuovo, ravenna. face-carving. the capital proper sometimes retained a semblance of the corinthian (fig. ) or ionic type; but was in other cases greatly simplified in mass and covered with lace-like or basket-like patterns, some- times deeply undercut—the basket type fig. ; figure , page . these occur alike in ravenna, parenzo, constantinople, salonica, venice and syria. in the magnificent capitals of the great columns of hagia sophia the impost-block is dispensed with (plates xii, byzantine ornament ; xiii, ), and the vigorous but graceful mass of the capital, with its corner volutes and surface carving of flat acanthus-leaves, performs adequately its true function of carry- ing the heavy arches that rest upon it. a frequently occurring - type with central and gggg ggggg corner ridges (fig. ) may have been suggested by uncut or roughed-out corinthian caps, blocked-out in this way for the subsequent detailed cutting of the central rosettes and volutes and the corner volutes, cau- licoli and leaves. shafts. shafts are of polished marble, granite or porphyry, sometimes, as in hagia sophia, ringed with a number of astragals or annulets, a treatment detrimental to the best effect. spandrels and soffits. the soffits were decorated either with mosaic, as in s. vitale at ravenna and the upper arcades of hagia i this ingenious and plausible suggestion seems to have originated with the late professor w. r. ware. iergiu fig. . above, carved spandrel from haoia sophia; below, frieze from st. serqius. a history of ornament sophia, or with marble, which was sometimes carved in bands of lace-like patterns as in the lower arcades of hagia sophia. the archivolt was marked by small moldings (plate xii, ). spandrels were commonly incrusted with marble without other ornament, as in st. mark's; sometimes mosaic or fresco was used in either pictorial or arabesque patterns (plate xiii, ), or surface-carving was executed on the marble incrustation (fig. ). the nave of hagia sophia shows both of the last two treatments. carving. in all byzantine decorative carving, figure-sculpture, high relief and indeed true relief of any kind are singu- larly lacking. in their place the byzantine artists de- fio. . frieze, st. joux studios, constantinople. veloped a system of carving by incision, the entire pat- tern lying in one plane, so designed that the background formed a series of isolated pits or depressions, the total effect being rich and highly decorative in spite of its flat- ness. the patterns were chiefly based on the acanthus and rinceau (figs. , , ); but the leaves and stems were flattened, the lobes made pointed, the pipes suppressed, the calyx-flowers and caulicoli of the rinceau byzantine ornament obliterated, and the points of the leaves so disposed as to touch the concave sides of the stems of their neighbors, or to meet each other point to point, forming innumer- able triangular or quadrilateral pits or spots of back- ground. the leaves were channeled with v-section channels, and the whole produced an effect as of stone lace work applied to a flat background (figs. , ). the origin of this peculiar treatment of classic motives has been variously explained. viollet-le-duc credits fig. . acanthus anthemions. fig. . it to syrian, and chiefly to jewish influence. early christian and pre-christian tombs in palestine show a somewhat similar style of dry and flat surface-carving, with frequent use of the vine-motive which is also com- mon in byzantine ornament. in central syria inter- esting remains from the third to sixth centuries also dis- play kinship with byzantine work (fig. ). on the other hand, the same tendencies are visible in the palace at spalato (see ante, fig. ) in dalmatia, and to some extent in works of constantine's time. the a history of ornament most probable explanation of the genesis of the style, so far as its decorative art is concerned, is found in the influence of the asiatic greeks, who would most natu- rally combine the asiatic love of surface decoration in minutely detailed all-over patterns, with the traditional motives of greek classic and roman art. it was the rise and preeminence of constantinople in the sixth cen- fio. . anthemion frieze, st. mask's, venice. tury under justinian, that gave to this nascent style its first great impulse. the artificers in mosaic, ivory- carving, enamel and other arts from constantinople, many of whom had, during the preceding century, found their chief employment in italy and other foreign coun- tries, were now abundantly and constantly employed in their home capital. under justinian's strenuous and splendor-loving rule, the arts of design were developed with an almost feverish activity. the flat surface-carv- ing harmonized better with the flat color-decoration in marble and mosaic than the more vigorous relief of the byzantine ornament roman and greek prototypes; and architectural light- and-shade was treated in a wholly new spirit, and the old types of capital and entablature gradually disappeared. moldings. the profiles were weak; effect was sought by enrich- ment rather than pro- filing; and splay faces covered with acanthus- leaves frequently occur (fig. and plate xii, , , ). the most characteristic molding was the so- called billet molding, cut into small blocks or dentils, often in two rows in which the blocks of one are op- posite the spaces of the other, as appears in the lower part of in plate xii. this molding was especially used for framing the slabs of marble veneer, and contributed strongly to the general effect of a sparkling play of minute spots of light and shade which the byzantine artists loved. bands and borders. the fret, anthemion, vine and rinceau of classic art all appear in byzantine borders and friezes, but in fig. . crosses and anthemions. a history of ornament modified forms, often exhibiting a singular reversion towards earlier, long-forgotten types in greek pottery. the artists of the sixth to twelfth centuries could hardly have known or even seen any antique greek vases, and it is hard to explain how and why this reversion took place; it most probably came about through roman ver- sions of the anthemion and other vase ornaments, sur- viving in roman carvings and mosaics (compare fig. with fig. ). what makes this rever- sion the more interesting is that most of these byzantine anthemions are really acanthus leaves in disguise, as may be seen by comparing them with unmistakable acanthus leaves like those in figs. and . the byzantine carvers, by flattening the leaf and altering its lobes, gradually worked it into a quasi-anthemion form, and then under a similar decorative impulse did fig. . acanthus leaves (above); and rinceau fbom bishop's. b byzantine ornament with it much as the greek pottery-painters had done with the anthemion and palmette, nearly or quite a thou- sand years earlier. the binceau. this has already been alluded to. the friezes from st. sergius (fig. ) and st. john studios (emir akhor jami) at constantinople (fig. ), are fine examples of the typical byzantine continuous rinceau- movement uninterrupted by calyx-flowers, and the merging of stem and caulicolus into one flat, flowing leaf design; while in fig. , b it is seen in its most de- generate form, in a carved slab from the bishop's palace at ferentino. the vine also occurs frequently, espe- cially in italy, singularly recalling painted vine-patterns on greek vases (fig. ). symbols. symbolism played an important part in the carved decoration as well as the mosaics of the byzantines. the vine, already alluded to, is often represented as springing from the paschal ~~ cup or chalice (plate xii, ); the cross often studded with jewels and always with spreading ends (figs. , a, b; and plate xii, , ); the cypress-tree, symbol of the grave, and hence of the mystic burial of baptism (see ante, page ), and in this sense carved on baptismal fonts and plutei and elsewhere in baptisteries (fig. ) in a form fiq. . vine border, s. vitale. a history of ornament singularly like an anthemion; the peacock, as the symbol of the soul (figure ; plate xii, )— these are the most frequently re- curring symbols. an effective decoration for square or circular panels was devised by making the four arms of the cross frame four acanthus-anthemions, as in fig. , a from hagia sophia. in later work, especially in italy where lombard influence may account for it, monsters and grotesques sometimes appear. it is curious to note how often pea- cocks (as in figure ; plate xii, ), lions or monsters, even griffins, as in the exam- ple from sta. maria pomposa (figure ) are placed symmetrically at the base of a cross or tree, recalling a favorite device of greek and roman art, derived origi- nally from assyrian and hittite prototypes. guilloches and interlace. the byzantine artists expanded the ap- plications of the greek guilloche-motive into a whole system of interlaced patterns, in which squares, lozenges and circles, large and small, are combined with great variety and ingenuity. the more elab- fio. . detail of cross in fio. . fig. a. see figure and cf. goblet d'alviella, "the migration of symbols," pages - . byzantine ornament orate examples belong to the later developments. some of the most complex designs are found in ar- menia, where they almost rival the celtic interlaces (see page ). whether these are due to celtic manuscripts carried into armenia, or whether the celtic interlaces were themselves descended from byzantine sources is not clear (fig. a; figures , ; plate xii, ). perforated panels were a special delight of the italo- byzantine designers; they are found chiefly at ravenna, serving as parapet-panels. figure shows a detail of one of the most splendid of these remarkable works (see also plate xii, ). floors and incrustations. the rich and varied marbles of the east supplied abundant materials for decorative pavements and wall- veneers. in principle these resemble those of the latin buildings; guilloche-patterns or borders frame large circles or rectangles of marble, porphyry and verd-an- tique in the floors; while thin slabs of veined marble set so as to form symmetrical veining-patterns, encrust the walls up to the spring of the main arches and vaults (fig. ; plate xii, ). the monotony of their smooth surfaces was broken by the billet-moldings with which the slabs and bands were framed. the composition of this wall-paneling was not always good; the apse of hagia sophia, for example, is a jumble of panels with little or no organic system in their arrangement. the general effect, however, of this veneering in veined marbles is always rich and yet sober; and in st. mark's at venice it reached the highest perfection of internal harmony. a history of ornament fig. . from haoia mosaic. the crowning splendor of byzantine decoration was in its mosaics. these at first differed in no wise from the latin (see page ), which were, indeed, probably executed in many cases by byzantine ar- tists. but the domes and vaults of the east gave special oppor- tunities for the application of this noble form of decoration, and these were freely availed of. conventional ornament was made to play a far more im- portant role in the byzantine sophia. than in the basilican churches, though figure-subjects and pictures still form the chief decoration. hagia sophia and the kahrie mosque (once a byzan- tine church called mone tes choras) at constan- tinople and the two churches of san apolli- nare, the episcopal pal- ace and san vitale at ravenna offer the finest examples of this art, the cubes or tessera? of glass being very small, espe- f,g - ^^*ec°™agus elfd' fig. .—from sta. maria pomposa fig. .—mosaic, tomb of galla placidia fig. .—ivory throne of bishop maximian, ravenna byzantine ornament daily in the first-named. one of the earliest examples of the application of glass mosaic of this type to vault- ing is the tomb of galla placidia, the daughter of theo- dosius, at ravenna; the barrel-vaults of the cross arms and the rude dome of the central lantern being adorned with remarkably effective pictures and patterns, some on a blue and some on a gold ground (figure ). the gold ground predominates in hagia sophia and in some other examples and imparts a richness of effect not otherwise attainable (plate xiii). in many byzantine mosaic pictures there appear rep- resentations of shrines, niches and other architectural subjects derived from sarcophagi, church furniture and minor structures of which no trace has survived. simi- lar forms are seen in manuscript illuminations and in ivory carvings and sarcophagi (fig. ). church furniture. few examples remain of this branch of decorative design for which the byzantines were so celebrated. the accounts of the furniture of hagia sophia given by paul the silentiary describe an almost incredible splendor of jewels, gold and silver. the most impor- tant work of this sort in metal now extant is the "pala d'oro" or silver-and-gold altar-piece of st. mark's in venice, by constantinople artists of the twelfth cen- tury (but much altered in more recent times). plate xii, , figures the end of an italo-byzantine silver chest in florence. of works in marble there exists in the basilica of s. apollinare in classe at ravenna a by- zantine baldaquin or ciborium, and in venice the much a history of ornament later ciborium of st. mark's, besides a fine octagonal canopy and pulpit in the north aisle. in the cathedral of ravenna the ivory throne of bishop maximianus is carefully preserved (sixth century, figure ). ivory carving, indeed, was one of the special arts of byzan- tine civilization; book-covers, diptychs and triptychs in this material exist in museums and private collections. ivory was a precious material in the middle ages, and the art displayed in these small works combined the pictorial composition of the manuscript illuminators with the technic and the ornament of the marble-carvers, but with more freedom in the relief. the cross, pictorial scenes and grapevine borders of the throne of maxim- ianus just referred to, are precisely in the style of the diptychs, though on a larger scale. in many of the minor works of church equipment and furniture enamel was used with or without the accom- paniment of gems in elaborate settings, to impart rich color to the object decorated. the field of each color was slightly hollowed out in the metal—silver, gold or copper—and in this shallow pool the separate colors were fused in the furnace. this process, called champleve enameling, was carried in the path of byzan- tine trade to france where, at limoges, an important center of this art-industry was developed in the twelfth to fourteenth centuries. fig. represents the crown of charlemagne, a fine example of late byzan- tine goldsmith's work of the ninth century. there are in various libraries highly ornate book-covers in gold, enamel and precious stones of the ninth to twelfth cen- turies. byzantine ornament textile ornament. the arts of weaving and embroidery were highly de- veloped by the byzantine civilization, which delighted fig. . the crown of charlemagne. in splendor of official apparel. byzantine stuffs, fabrics and embroideries are found in many museums, mostly those of the later phases of the art (ninth to twelfth centuries). fig. shows an example from the museum of bamberg. manuscript illumination. christianity has been called the religion of a book. in no other religion has the written word played so important a part. long before the final fixing of the canon of the new testament, individual books—gospels, epistles, writings by the early fathers—were being a history of ornament multiplied by skilful scribes and widely circulated by missionaries. the development of monasticism stimu- lated the production of books and led to the establish- ment of schools of calligraphists and miniaturists or illuminators. with increasing veneration for the sacred writings there came increasing splendor in the manu- scripts, which were embellished by pictures, illuminated initials and decorative borders. in this new art the by- zantine greeks showed the highest skill, and the result was the final domination of the byzantine taste and style in this field, as in the closely allied art of mosaic picturing and ornament. the initial letters of chapters or books were made into ornamental designs covering a considerable por- tion of the page, and painted with brilliant red, blue, green and gold, often with accompaniments of an archi- tectural character with or without figures. illustrations of scriptural scenes and allegorical compositions were often introduced, covering an entire page. in these the drawing and coloring followed the formulas that governed the design of like figures in mosaic and fresco decorations of the churches; formulas that became hieratic and were finally written down in inflexible rules that have survived to modern times in the monasteries of mt. athos, and in the icons of the russian churches. this stiff and conventional style of painting was the parent of italian religious painting in the middle ages; and indeed of all christian medieval painting, architec- tural as well as in manuscripts. for the byzantine manuscripts were scattered through the monasteries and » cf. crowninshield, "mural painting." carvings from church&s ct fiokhctaans chouamta; georgia. fiq. .—georgian and armenian cabvino byzantine ornament :::::::::::::: ? ::::::c:::::: fio. . byzantine fabric, bamberg. ern myths, even those of pagan origin, to supply motives for elaborate in- terlaces in borders and in- itials. syrian christian ornament. in syria, christian art took on a special form in the absence of the brick, timber, marble and glass on which latin and by- zantine art so largely de- pended for artistic ex- pression. the buildings of central syria show a churches of western as well as eastern europe, and formed the models from which both the celtic and scandinavian | schools of manuscript decoration took their ear- ly inspiration. in these interlace, which is a sub- ordinate element in the eastern models, became a dominant feature, though it made use of the north- fio. . syrian carving. byzantine ornament books recommended: byzantine as before, essenwein, gehspach, hubsch, von quast. also, bayet: l'art byzantin (paris, n. d.).—h. c. butler: architecture and other arts in northern central syria (new york, ).—a. dehli: selections of byzantine ornament (new york, ).—diehl: manuel de vart byzantin (paris, ).—g. g. gagabin: sbornik bisantiskikh i drevnerusskikh ornamentor (st. petersburg [petrograd], ).—moscow museum of abt : histoire de vornement russe du xme au xvi " si^cle d'apres les manuscrits (paris, ).—ongania: la basilica di san marco (venice, - ).—r. p. pulxan: on the decoration of basilicas and byzantine churches (papers of the r. i. b. a.; london, - ).—salzenberg: die alt- christlichen baudeukmale von constantmopel (berlin, ).— n. simakov: l'ornement russe (st. petersburg [petrograd], ).—texier and pullan: byzantine architecture (lon- don, ).—vioi/let-le-duc: l'art russe (paris, ).— de vogue: syrie centrale (paris, - ). s chapter xiv romanesque oenament . italian and feench a strictly chronological treatment of ornament his- tory might be held to require taking up at this point the beginnings of mohammedan ornament; but a due re- gard for continuity prescribes rather the following of the current of european christian art through the mid- dle ages before taking up the diverging art of the mos- lems, which will therefore be reserved for another vol- ume. the name romanesque has been so widely applied to the various phases of european art in its transition from the latin and byzantine phases to the so-called gothic, that it will be retained in this discussion. it is, indeed, not an inappropriate term, since the art of italy and western europe from about the ninth to the thirteenth century sprang from roots easily traced back to pri- mary sources in the art of classic rome. the romanesque period. throughout all europe, except in parts of the byzan- tine empire, the centuries from the fall of rome to the twelfth constituted a period of chaos, upheaval, and gradual evolution. war, famine, and pestilence re- fig. . detail from front of san michele, lucca fig. .—false window, san stefano, bologna a history of ornament for which constantinople was famous, manuscripts, ivory-carvings, ecclesiastical goldsmith's work and em- broideries. mosaic, however, was never in demand in the west; form rather than color dominates roman- esque art, and the resources of the abbeys and parishes were bestowed upon large and spacious edifices rather than upon such costly adornments as that of mosaic. italian romanesque ornament. italy being not a state but a group of states and prov- inces, there appear at least five more or less distinct styles in her early medieval art; the basilican or latin in rome and its neighborhood; the byzantine in venice, ravenna and on the east coast generally; the tuscan in etruria (tuscany) from pisa to florence and even siena; in the south, especially in sicily, the siculo- arabic, a compound of arabic, byzantine, latin and norman elements; and in the north the lombard, in which the germanic spirit of the race which overran northern italy in the seventh century expressed itself in new forms and combinations. but while these may be properly called distinct styles, they so frequently overlap and mingle that it is not always easy, nor indeed reasonable, to classify a given building definitely in one of these categories. the unity of the church, the migrations of monks and other ecclesiastics and especially of builders and carvers, con- tributed to a constant blurring of the boundary lines of these styles. the basilican and byzantine styles have been already discussed, but in many examples from the other styles romanesque ornament their influence is clearly seen in various details. more- over, these two styles in their later manifestations un- derwent developments and changes, from the influence of western art, which differentiate them from their ear- lier phases. basilicas of the latin type continued to be built until the thirteenth century, and the art of the mosaicist in opus alexandrinum was developed in great splendor by successive generations of the cosma family and their apprentices, in altars, pulpits, and other archi- tectural applications, so that this sort of inlaid geometric mosaic is commonly known as cosmati work. roman artists carried it into southern italy and sicily, where it mingled with the siculo-arabic work. the ex- amples referred to in chapter xii, and illustrated in figs. - , may be compared with the altar-front from ferentino in figure and the columns from monreale in figure . in florence especially, ex- amples of the persistence of this art may be seen in va- rious details of the cathedral and giotto's campanile (figure ). tuscan romanesque. in pisa, lucca, pistoia and the neighborhood there was developed in the llth- th centuries an ecclesias- tical style based on the basilican plan but dressed in an architectural apparel of black and white marble in stripes, adorned with purely decorative arcades; re- cessed arches springing from pilasters against the lower- story walls, and superposed tiers of free arches on columns in the upper stories of the front. inlaid pat- terns, chiefly geometric, adorned the tympana and a history of ornament spandrels of the lower arches (fig. ). carving was sparingly used, but the capitals were carefully carved on classic models, and the shafts sometimes carved with rinceaux of equally classic character (ca- thedral and baptistery of pisa, eleventh century). in lucca the cathedral and the later church of s. mi- fig. . ixlaid patterns, pisa cathedral. chele (figure ) show rich inlays of black on white, with fantastic grotesques, due perhaps to lombard in- fluence which is also seen in some of the columns, and in the lions or monsters which serve as bases to columns in many churches. some of the carving at lucca sug- gests byzantine influence. the use of striping in dark marble and of inlay is seen as far east as in bologna. figure shows a window of the baptistery of s. stefano, where byzantine influence appears in the inter- laces of the perforated panels set in the striped wall. the richly carved lintels of doors in the church of s. giusto, lucca (figure ), show the mixture of influ- ences which impinged on art in tuscany. in florence and san miniato, paneling in black and white takes the place of striping—a less correct treat- romanesque ornament ment structurally though more decorative. in some churches, especially in the baptistery at florence and in san miniato, the pavements show inlaid patterns in black and white which could hardly be surpassed for decorative beauty (figure ). altar and altar-rail at s. miniato are treated with inlays of the same sort. the style was occasionally imitated in remote cities, as at troja in southeast italy, where the cathedral is decorated with recessed arcades after the pisan manner. the siculo-arabic style. the arab conquest of sicily and the subsequent ex- pulsion of the mohammedans by the crusaders, with the establishment of a norman kingdom, and the persist- ence of byzantine tradi- tions, all combined to de- velop a singularly mixed but effective style of decora- tion. the arabic pointed fro. . cunc decoration, arch, inlaid marble wain- pa"rmo- scot with a serrated parapet-cresting after the fashion of cairo, byzantine glass-mosaic on the upper walls and occasional vaults, are conspicuous in such edifices as the cathedrals of monreale (figure ), the martorana and palatine chapels at palermo, and others. latin or "cosmati" mosaics inlaid in twisted shafts adorn the cloisters of monreale (figure ; see also figure ), and some of the pulpits and altars. the open-timber ceilings are richly painted and gilded; cufic inscriptions a history of ornament appear in these (fig. ) and arabic geometric interlace in the pavements. the bronze doors are by north italian artists (fig. ), and here and there even lom- bard details occur. color appears ev- erywhere, in ori- ental profusion. except in the cap- itals, many of which are antique, carving is little used, but some of the cloister capitals at monreale are fine examples of decorative sculpture, showing both norman and byzantine influences (figure ) .* it was a brilliant, confused, and short-lived style. lombard. this style was not confined to lombardy; it prevailed through emilia and as far east as verona, and south even into calabria and apulia. the lombards, a ger- manic race by origin, introduced into italian art an entirely new note of solemnity and somber humor, ex- pressed in the rugged massiveness of their churches and the grotesques in their carving. they contributed to architecture decorative forms and devices which spread i the spiral and zigzag flirtings shown in figure were originally filled with cosmati-work of inlaid mosaics. fio. . detail from bronze doors, monreale cathedral. romanesque ornament into western romanesque art. among these were the arcade cornice (fig. ), long pilaster strips—flat, semi-cylindrical, or spirally twisted; the round or wheel- window (figure ), the col- umn resting on a monster's back; the splayed doorway adorned with many columns in the jambs and with successively recessed or stepped arches above the door-lintel (figure ). the open arcade under the fig. . arcaded corn- eaves of many lombard s. m*™, paiua. churches is a part of the architecture rather than orna- ment. many of these features are common in the french and germanic romanesque, though they origi- nated in italy. there was a constant interchange be- tween the benedictine monasteries of these countries; the crusades brought western hordes into italy, and such commerce as there was aided the dissemination of architectural ideas as well as of commodities. more- over the mcestri comadrii, the skilled masons and carvers organized into guilds of traveling artisans, were almost wholly recruited from the north italian country, and they carried their art into remote regions of italy and into other lands. grotesques. the medieval "bestiaries," of which copies have come down to our day, prove the symbolic significance of many of the grotesque sculptures, each beast and part of a beast having a specific meaning, so that each com- a history of ornament bination of heterogeneous parts to form a grotesque monster, signified a particular combination of definite ideas, as in a symbolic language. but the medieval sculptors of lom- bardy, with imagi- nations saturated with the medieval superstitions which peopled air, earth and sea with count- less invisible be- ings, mostly mal- efic, loving to blast and blight every perfect and beauti- tiful thing, but which could be di- verted by charms, incantations and symbols, and even by marring in ap- pearance the seem- ing perfection of a human work — these germanic italians of the north treated with a species of humor- ous decorative art the wild and fantastic symbols and this superstition survives in a real but attenuated form in the jettatura of italy and the "evil eye" of the eastern mediterranean. fig. . cap from aubona; symbols of evangelists on a pulpit; centaub from san ambrot.io, milan. romanesque ornament talismans which grew out of this superstition (fig. ). other forms. not a little of the italian ornament of the roman- esque period is hard to classify under any particular style-name, being the product of local or of conflicting influences. thus the wheel-windows show considerable variety. the marble perforations of the cathedral of troja suggest oriental prototypes, while the traceries of those of s. pietro and of sta. maria at toscanella are designed on quite different principles. certain italian manuscripts of this period betray the hand or influence of irish scribes. this variety of style in italian romanesque art presents an interesting contrast to the impressive unity of general effect in western, es- pecially french, work of the same period. the french romanesque general character. french romanesque ornament is completely domi- nated by the monastic architecture. previous to about architecture in france was extremely crude, ex- cept in provence, while roman traditions still imparted a certain elegance to ecclesiastical buildings. by a. d. the feudal system on the one hand, and the monastic on the other, had attained coherent form, and were domi- nant over the developments of the nascent civilization. architecture was chiefly military and monastic, and while the feudal lords built strong castles, the monks 'consult revoil, "architecture romane du midi de la france:" plates. a history of ornament = f' r t ti 'j^l* *j • j l*j * ^j ^^i* ll^ij ^*jji' l^.* l'*j? i sm i in sunn>y>i>w%-iriif&>wa'cv»: were learning to build stone churches with vaults. in the absence of antique ruins to serve as quarries of ready- made decorative material, and without either models or trained artisans for the pro- duction of mosaic, carving and inlay, the arts of decora- tion had to be created anew. the art that slowly emerged from this destitution was a struggling art, at first crude in design and execution. to its earliest phase the french give the name of carolingian art. the architecture was massive, thick-jointed, spar- ing in ornament except about fo, ^™l°rhthe doorways, at which the builders' highest art was be- stowed. as the eleventh century advances, this art be- comes finer, richer, more knowing, still vigorous but bet- ter in technic; the accessory arts multiply and grow in perfection. there developed a certain unity of general style throughout france, controlled to a remarkable ex- tent by a rigid logic of construction. more than in any previous style in any land, the forms not merely of the structure proper, but also of its decoration, were deter- mined by the special exigencies of materials and struc- tural science. although provincial schools appear in romanesque ornament the architecture (provence, charente, auvergne, bur- gundy, normandy, ile-de-france) the decorative de- tails do not vary greatly. true, the byzantine influ- ence is more clearly traceable in some districts, the clas- sic in others, especially in provence (fig. ), but it requires a closer discrimination to detect these pro- vincial variations in the ornament than in the architec- ture, in the details than in the composition, and far more than is required to classify italian ornament of the same period. this is due to the dominance of the great mon- astic orders, especially of the benedictines; uniformly skilful artists, they tended to develop a common style wherever they established their abbeys. architectural ornament: columns and capitals. the french romanesque column is a descendant from the classic column, modified by its new uses as a mem- ber of a compound pier or as a jamb-shaft or nook-col- umn in a door or window. lombard or comacine influ- ences seem to have had a share in its development. the shaft is straight, without en- tasis or taper (figure ); sometimes, in late doorways, richly carved with geometric patterns (figure ). the base is of the attic type, often with corner-leaves fio. . baseo with (figure ). the capitals spum- are generally of the corinthian type, but with a heavy abacus added, and the proportions and details modified in innumerable ways (figure ; plate xiv). at a history of ornament moissac they have a decidedly byzantine character. the introduction of grotesques, both human and bestial, gave rise to new types (figures , ). occasion- ally a species of cushion capital is used, especially in normandy, the upper part square, with a heavy abacus; later the chisel comes into more general use, and the established types are greatly varied by the introduction of figures, jewel-studded bands, and foliage of new types. in plate xiv, , , , the corinthian tradition is clearly shown in all the capitals. carving; bands and panels. the classic acanthus-leaf, rinceau, and even anthe- mion appear constantly in various modifications, and in ♦ consult article "sculpture" in v.-le-duc "dictionnaire raisonnd de l'archltecture." fig. . late romanesque capital, paris. the lower part scalloped or convex-fluted once or more times on each face. a very beautiful double capital is pre- served in the museum at tou- louse (plate xiv, ). an- other double cap is number in the same plate, from chalons-sur-marne. the con- trast in style illustrates the difference between the carving of provence, with strong by- zantine tinge, and that of the ile-de-france in the north. some of the earlier work is hewn out with the mason's-ax; a history of ornament fio. . ac- anthus leaves fbom avallon. entire design is carved in high relief and sometimes deeply undercut (figs. , hjflsj ). the double rinceau sometimes ap- pears, enclosing the large leaves in ovals or in heart-shaped openings (fig. ). in almost all cases the rinceau represents the grape-vine and its ecclesiastical sym- fin| im^sj holism is obvious. the framed anthemion, so common in byzantine carving, hardly occurs in french romanesque friezes or bands. towards the end of the twelfth century, however, we find in its place, and evidently descended from it, an ornament consisting of broad fluted triple or five-lobed leaves enclosed by branching leaves often adorned with jewels. sometimes the central leaf of the trilobe is carried up under the fram- ing leaves and curled over it (fig- ure ). this motive seems to have come in from germany, and is frequently found in painted orna- ment, both on walls and on manu- scripts. in certain regions along the paths of byzantine and lombard influ- ence, beasts and human figures are shown twined into the convolutions of the rinceau (plate xiv). ar- cading as a decorative external fea- ture never attained in france the . rinceau, avallon. romanesque ornament importance it achieved in northern italy. the two most noted examples are the fronts of notre dame at poitiers and of the cathedral of angouleme (about ). these be- tray italian and byzan- tine influence; the arches are not free as at pisa, but attached to (or re- cessed in) the wall, fram- ing statues, windows or reliefs. internally, how- ever, wall-arcades occur frequently, especially as decorations of the side- aisle walls under the win- dows; such arcades are called arcatures. in normandy the arches are sometimes interlaced, and this device was later adopted in england and is common in anglo-norman churches. moldings. with the new types of building a new art of molding- profiles begins to appear. whether its origin is in the lombard doorways or is local, its development was con- trolled by that logic of structure to which allusion has fro. . double rinceatt, notre dame, paris. a history of ornament already been made, and which specially distinguishes french romanesque architectural art. all arches being stepped, and their square edges, as already described, cut into roll-moldings between chamfers, there resulted in doorways and pier-arches an alternation of plane, hollow and convex surfaces which proved extremely ef- fective (figures , ). out of this simple treat- ment was developed a more elaborate system of varying hollows, rolls and flat surfaces, which the english gothic artists were to carry in later times to the highest per- fection (see chapter xviii). in contrast with the classic tradition, according to which all important mold- ings project from the general surface, the medieval builders developed the contrary system of moldings cut into the surface. the exception is in the projecting drip-moldings which defined the extrados of the arch on exterior walls, especially over doorways. doorways. as a general rule the outer step or "order" of a series of stepped doorway-arches was brought down upon an inpost carried by a column set flush with the outer face of the wall, or upon the square pier formed by the wall itself. sometimes, however, it was returned into the wall, as in figure , or abutted into projecting members, as in figure . each "order" of the series of diminishing arches was carried by its own distinct supports, whether columns (jamb-shafts) or piers, as in figures , . the various orders were either plain, with roll-moldings, as already explained, or carved with enrichments often of great splendor of ef- romanesque ornament feet. it was upon the church doorways that the monastic artists lavished their richest ornaments. in the north, geo- metric motives were especially promi- nent, and among these the zigzag was particularly favored in normandy (d in fig. ), cut into the face of the arch, or into the soffit, or both; the "broken-stick" ("bdtons-rompus"), the lozenge and dog-tooth or pyramid (i) are also common. byzantine influence is discernible in the billet (e, fig. ), and in the flat treatment of figure-re- liefs in the tympanum as at carrenac (figure ). imbrications (g), checkers (&), "nail-heads," foliage- forms and grotesques are also of fre- quent occurrence. figures , from st. pierre at aulnay, and from rouen cathedral (porte st. jean) show the extraordinary richness of some of these romanesque doorways. the rouen example belongs to the early th century and is therefore early gothic, but it is still full of the spirit, and shows many of the details, of the romanesque. horizontal moldings receive but little emphasis in french romanesque ornament, and there are no dis- tinctly typical horizontal moldings, except those of the attic bases of the columns already mentioned. hori- zontal bands, however, are not uncommon, richly carved, often with anthemions or palmettes (fig. ) which betray the ever-present byzantine influence. in place fio. . ro- manesque or- naments. a history of ornament of the classic cornice the monastic builders had only the lombard arcaded cornice, or the more elab- orate corbel table. in minor posi- tions the simplest copings with one or two moldings suffice. corbel tables. these may have originated in the classic modillion-cornice, or they may have been evolved out of fw. i. carved bands, the necessity of providing a pro- fro* sx. aubik, anoers. jecting shelf at the top of the wall. in provence (southern france) the first is doubtless the correct explanation, as the corbel-table of the gable over the porch of st. trophime at aries has corbels carved with the acanthus in evident reminiscence of classic modillions. in central and northern france the corbels are usually grotesques of masks or monsters. in some cases they are found in conjunction with the lombard arcaded cornice, particularly in auvergne and in southern france. corbels for other purposes than the support of a corbel-table were of varied forms, often resembling capitals with a "drop" or "cul-de-lampe" at the bottom, formed either of foliage or of figures or gro- tesques. figure sculpture. it was during this period that the french began the development of that wonderful art of decorative sculp- ture which they carried to so marvelous a height of artis- romanesque ornament tic beauty in the portal-sculptures of their gothic cathe- drals, at chartres, amiens and reims. at first they were contented with reliefs in the portal tympanium (figure ) but free statues were later set in the deep jambs of the portals, representing saints and apostles and martyrs: this practice appears to have begun about fio. . fbench romanesque grotesque. the middle of the th century (figure ). by- zantine and classic influences and traditions dominate in the earlier sculpture (plate xiv, , ); but the french soon impressed upon all their sculpture, whether of stat- ues, reliefs or grotesques, the stamp of their own orig- inal genius (fig. ; plate xiv, ). both in tech- nical execution and in appropriateness to its architec- tural setting, these later romanesque sculptures mark the opening of a new chapter in decorative art. painted decoration. the scanty remains of the painted decoration in a history of ornament french romanesque churches indicate a prevailing sim- plicity, marked by effective composition with rather crude coloring and execution. the painted ornament was generally restricted to certain well-defined portions of the edifice, such as the apse and chapels. wall sur- faces were marked with conventional masonry joints or simple quarries, spangles or diapers in red ochre and black; sometimes the effect was varied by painted wall- arcades and representations of wall-draperies with con- ventional folds. columns were striped or painted with chevrons or zigzags in red, dark green and yellow or gold, and the capitals were enriched in the same colors. figure painting was rare; when employed it was strongly byzantine in character, like the contemporary manuscript pictures, as at st. ceneri, or ste. rade- gonde, poitiers. leaf-forms were sometimes used for borders and narrow bands. accessory arts. in iron-work, tiles and wood-carving the french mo- nastic artists executed works of considerable merit, em- ploying generally forms akin to the architectural orna- ment or else inspired from byzantine models; but they f«>. . leaf pattern, there was a flourishing school of tile, st. omeb. workers in enamel by the cham- by no means equaled the variety and richness of the italian deco- rators. figure shows a door knocker of the th cen- tury, from a cast in the troca- dero museum. at limoges romanesque ornament plevé process. in this work, as in the other minor arts, the byzantine influence is prominent. fig. is a characteristic leaf-detail from the red-and-brown tiling in the cathedral of st. omer. the tile floors of chan- cels and chapels of the late romanesque period were often of great elegance, in simple and effective patterns in buff, red, brown and black. books recommended: as before, hubsch. also: baum: romanesque architecture in france (london, ).—cahiek and martin: mélange» d'archéologie (paris, ).—cattaneo: l'architecture en italie (venice, ).—courajod: leçons professées, etc. (paris, ).—cummings: a history of architecture in italy (boston, ).—de dabtein: etudes sur varchitecture lombarde (paris, ).—dehio and bezold: die kirchliche baukwnst des abendlandes (stuttgart, - ).—f. m. hessemer: arabische und alt-italienische bauverzierwngen (berlin, ).—lecoy de la marche: les manuscrits et la miniature (paris, ).—e. molinier: l'orfèvrerie civile et religieuse du ve à la fin du xesiècle (paris, ).—musée de sculpture comparée du trocadéro (paris, no date).—f. osten: bauwerke in der lombardei (frankfort, n. d.).—h. rÉvon.: architecture romane du midi de la france (paris, ).— rohault de fleury: les monuments de pise (paris, ).— e. e. viollet-le-duc: dictionnaire raisonné de varchitecture française, etc. (paris, ). chapter xv romanesque ornament ii. anglo-norman, german, spanish and scandinavian anglo-norman ornament. previous to the norman conquest of england in , the architecture of that country was of the crudest description, and, the ornament of the style, the so-called saxon, was so rude and scanty as hardly to deserve men- tion. with the incoming of the new and foreign ele- ment, however, there hegan a remarkable development, both architectural and decorative; and, as is so often the case, the result of the blending was in some respects more brilliant than even the stronger of the parent styles. while the norman (more properly "anglo-norman") architecture derived its chief inspiration from french norman models, it rapidly diverged from them into a strongly national style in which carved decoration was very liberally employed. this anglo-norman orna- ment is remarkable for its vigor, variety and effective- ness. its fundamental elements were comparatively few, and chiefly of french origin, but it was more abundant and varied in its details and applications. norman columns. the bases, of the attic type, have spur-leaves some- times but not always; the shafts are usually plain, but romanesque ornament sometimes carved with zigzags, spiral flutings, or large quarry-patterns (as at durham). the capitals are rarely of the corinthianesque type (fig. ; plate xv, ), except in late instances under french influence. the prevailing type is the cubic or cushion type (fig. ); next the foliated or corinthianesque, and the least frequent are the grotesque capitals. sometimes two fio. . capital from lincoln cathedral. fio. . capital from st. peter's, northampton. types are combined side by side, as in plate xv, . the abacus is heavy, molded, sometimes carved with saw- teeth, zigzags or other ornaments. the scalloped cushion type is also very common (plate xv, ). cor- bels are either plain or grotesque. doorways, arches and moldings. the doorways are often extremely rich, especially after . the zigzag is the ornament most fre- quently used; it is carved on each of several arch-steps and sometimes carried down the jambs in lieu of nook- a history of ornament fig. . ornaments from ifflby church. shafts, as at iffley. zigzags on the face and soffit of an arch are ar- rayed to produce al- ternate pyramids and lozenge-shaped holes; al- ternate zigzags are con- vex and concave in section. saw-teeth, star- flavers, pyramid-jewels, moldings (fig. ). round jewels or "nail- heads" are applied in hollow moldings, and rosettes or flowers are not uncommon. another characteristic ornament is the beak-head,—a grotesque bird's head with enormous beak, applied to the voussoirs of an arch, the beak pointed in- wards, and sometimes inp spanning several mold- yj/i ings (fig. ). gro- |i tesques occur in arch or- naments, but rarely. the' billet-molding also oc- curs occasionally, but usu- ally with round billets in- stead of square. the effect of the crowded ornament of the anglo-norman doorways is often extremely rich, fio. . beak-head molding, iffley church. romanesque ornament the multiplied points of light on projecting details show- ing brilliantly against the dark shadows. famous ex- amples of such doorways are those of iffley church, barfreston church and the prior's door of ely cathe- dral, and many others. arcatures are of frequent occurrence, usually with in- terlaced arches. these are found sometimes even on the exterior, though more usually employed for interior walls (fig. ). other carved ornament. free figure sculpture is almost unknown, but figures in relief are sometimes seen, and grotesques, both human and animal are very frequent. foli- age is rare, and when it occurs is highly conventional and very simple. the anthemion motive is not uncom- mon (fig. ); it is obviously of byzantine derivation by way of the french romanesque. interlace is oc- casionally met with, probably due to ■* xv x'iu. sid. iflxu- celtic influence. laced arches. painted ornament appears to have been occasionally used in the chancels and wooden roofs of churches, but extant examples are very rare. that of the east end of st. cross church, near winchester, discovered late in the last century and restored, shows simple conventional pat- terns in red ocher and black. the ceiling of peterboro' reproduces the painted lozenge-pattern of the original which it replaces. that of ely is also a modern decora- tion based on norman precedents. a history of ornament fonts; metalwork. a few "saxon" or pre-norman fonts have been pre- served, all of crude workmanship, the more elaborate among them suggest- ing an effort to copy byzantine details. the norman fonts are of better work- manship, cut in stone or cast in lead, usu- ally in the form of a square or round bowl on a short shaft (or several shafts) and base, and quite frequently adorned with figure subjects, poorly executed. the byzantine influence is often evi- dent in the norman fonts, some of which resemble fig. . celtic mss. initials. fio. . carved anglo-norman an- themions: from st. savior's, south- wark (above); hereford cathedral (be- romanesque ornament venetian-byzantine well- curbs. metal work does not appear to have been carried to an advanced degree of perfection in this period. the celebrated bronze can- dlestick of gloucester ca- thedral is evidently of for- eign, probably of italian,- workmanship. it is of an alloy of bronze and silver. (but see below.) 'mm f. ♦ < fio. . cover or shrine for st. patrick's bell. fio. . celtic interlaces. celtic ornament. the artists in the irish monasteries de- veloped a remarkable skill in certain depart- ments of decorative art, notably and fore- most, in manuscript il- lumination; almost to an equal degree in ecclesiastical metal- work. interlace of an extraordinary in- tricacy is a character- istic of their art in both fields. in this they display a close kinship of spirit with a history of ornament scandinavian art, in which the representation of the great tree yggdrasil, whose branches cover earth, heaven and the underworld, are interlaced with the convolutions of the serpent or dragon nithhoggr. whether these interlaces originated in the north or were developed from byzantine interlace it is difficult to de- cide. fig. illustrates various forms of celtic inter- lace initials; fig. shows carved interlaces and the curious spiral ornament called the "trumpet pattern." fig. is the famous shrine or cover of the iron bell of st. patrick, decorated with jewels and inter- laced filigree of flat silver wires; while fig. shows one quar- ter of the cumdach or case made for the molaise gospels, of sil- ver on bronze with jewels and fro. . quar™ the grotesque symbolic lion of op cover of molaise st. mark. this is dated about . the bell shrine is later. the celtic crosses serving as grave stones—particu- larly the so-called "high crosses" present the best ex- amples of irish stone-carving. the cross-arms are con- nected by a circle, and the angles between them cut into by curved notches; the flat faces and often the sides of the stone are covered with patterns (rarely with figures as at monasterboice) in low relief; the patterns show the characteristic interlaces, often very complex and elabo- rate. such a cross is shown in plate xv, . romanesque ornament german romanesque ornament. in germany, as in france and england, architectural decoration may be said to have its real beginning in the eleventh century, the earlier works being crude and al- most bare of ornament. the architectural awakening began in saxony, but its most brilliant and prolific fio. . capitals from gernrode. achievements were in the rhine provinces, where a truly splendid style of church architecture grew up in the llth- th centuries, in which the ornament is remark- able for its admirable propriety and its force and rich- ness of design. it would be hard to find better capitals in any of the medieval styles than those of these rhenish minsters, and the carving of grotesques fully equaled that in any other country. the decorative forms are all of foreign origin, french, lombard and byzan- tine, but combined with remarkable skill and wealth of fancy. the medium of transmission of these vari- romanesque ornament church-front of almost pure italian or lombard design. the arts of metal were practised with skill. both wrought-iron and cast bronze were employed for grilles, gates, hanging lamps or crown-lights and for candela- fio. . portal from heilsbronn. bra and church vessels. gold, silver and enamel were also employed for richer and finer products (of which an early example, perhaps of real byzantine manufac- ture, at aachen was illustrated in fig. ). manu- script illumination reached a high pitch of development in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, and stained glass in the thirteenth; the former following purely byzan- tine models, the latter retaining its romanesque charac- ter in the face of the growing gothic influence. in all a history of ornament these arts germany was influenced both from the west and the east, france, italy and byzantium contributing to the final result. examples of some of these various phases of german art are illustrated in plate xvi. spanish romanesque ornament. the spanish peninsula was the field of successive in- vasions, conquests and internal struggles through the fio. . tarragoxa. fio. . tabkagona (?). entire middle ages, and there was little chance for the development of any independent national style. the few great churches erected in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries show a dominant french influence (zamorra, avila, tarragona, salamanca, barcelona, compo- stella); and while the composition is vigorous and effec- tive and the ornament well disposed, it presents no strik- ing novelty of detail (figs. and illustrate two romanesque ornament capitals which are thoroughly german in style). a re- markable characteristic of this style is its absolute free- dom from moorish details or influence, although the eleventh and twelfth centuries witnessed the culmination pa fia. . norwegian carving: left side, from stedye church; right side, unidentified. fio. . choir seat, norwegian. of that brilliant art. this exemption was doubtless due to the hostility between the christians and moslems. scandinavian ornament. the decorative art of the north of europe, in the scandinavian peninsula especially, took on a special character, the precise origin and relations of which to byzantine art on the one hand and to celtic art on the other, are still subjects of controversy. as in celtic ornament, elaborate and complicated interlace is the dominant characteristic; and as in the celtic manu- a history of ornament fig. . details of candelabrum, scripts, the interlace is based largely on the convolutions of a dragon or serpent, nithhoggr, with the branches of the great earth-covering. tree yggdrasil. the most characteristic exam- ples of this art are in the wood-carvings of doors and doorways of ancient churches, some dating from the eleventh or even the tenth century (fig. ). as these are of later date than many masterpieces of irish manuscript or- nament, some of which belong to the eighth and possibly to the seventh century, it seems likely that this scandinavian art is, in part at least, rooted in irish art, though milan cathedral. this doubtless derived its first inspiration from constan- tinople and byzantine church fittings, ivories and gos- pels. fig. shows a norwegian chair (or rather stall romanesque ornament from a choir) of perhaps the twelfth century, in which the character of the earlier art still appears. romanesque metal work. it is difficult to assign precise national limits to some of the phases of metal work of the romanesque period, fig. . detail, chandelier at hildesheim. especially in the line of ecclesiastical gold and silver and silver-gilt copper. some of this work found in western churches was undoubtedly from the constantinople workshops—e.g., the famous pala d'oro or jeweled golden altarpiece of st. mark's, venice. the byzan- tines taught the art to the artisans of italy, france and germany, and figs. - illustrate some of the most famous examples of this work. fig. shows two details of the magnificent bronze candlestick in milan cathedral. a very similar candlestick, at least as to its base, is among the treasures of reims cathedral. fig. is from a bronze candlestick at hildesheim. the fine chalice in fig. is a part of the treasure of a church at bergen (norway), and illustrates the use of a history of ornament filigree with jewels, which was a characteristic byzan- tine form of the goldsmith's art. a very similar chalice is, or was, in the treasury of reims cathedral. fig. . gold cup, beroen. the architectural styles, thus grouped under the gen- eral name of romanesque, gradually passed over into what are called the gothic styles. the transition was not sudden, but the change though gradual, was a real one: not alone a change of details or of structural prin- ciples, but of spirit and character. the gothic styles romanesque ornament expressed the new order which came in with the final establishment of settled institutions, religious, political and social, throughout all western christendom. books recommended: as before, dehio and bezold, hubsch. also, bond: in- troduction to english church architecture (london, ); cathedrals of england and wales (london, ).—dahl- erup, holm and stork: tegnvnger af aeldre nordisk architek- tur (stockholm).—forster: denkmaler deutscher baukunst (leipzig, - ).—j. t. gilbert: facsimiles of national manuscripts of ireland (dublin, ).—a. hartel: archi- tectural details and ornaments of church buildings, etc. (new york, ).—hasak: die romanische und die gotische bau- kunst (stuttgart, ).—t. kutschmann: romanesque architecture and ornament in germany (text in german; new york, ).—c. mollinger: die deutsch-romanische architektur (leipzig, ).—h. otte: geschichte der romanischen baukunst in deutschland (leipzig, ).—t. rickman: an attempt to discriminate the styles, etc. (lon- don, ).—e. sharpe: churches of the nene valley; orna- ments of the transitional period; the seven periods of eng- lish architecture (london, various dates).—e. sullivan: the book of kells (new york, ).—w. r. ttmms: the history, theory and practice of illuminating (london, ). for spanish romanesque, consult the fine work of lamperez y romea, historia de la arquitectura cristiana espanola, etc., also the incomplete series entitled monumentos arquitectonicos de espafia, to be found in a few of the larger libraries. chapter xvi gothic ornament: structural gothic architecture was the result of the development which took place in the effort to solve the problem of constructing a vaulted cruciform church of stone, with a clearstory to light the central aisle or nave. all the special forms and details of this architecture are more or less directly incidental to this development: vault- ribbing, buttresses and pinnacles, clustered shafts, pointed arches, moldings and tracery, were all evolved in this process of working out the above problem. the greater part of the ornament of the medieval churches, chapels and even secular buildings, consisted of the adornment of these structural features. whatever dec- oration was not structural, either in function or origin, was symbolic or pictorial. the sculpture and the stained glass of the great cathedrals constituted an illustrated bible which even the most illiterate could in a measure understand. this style-development took place first of all in france. other countries borrowed from france both the general composition and the details of their gothic architecture* england alone among them retained a large measure of independence, developing her own gothic style freely along national lines from germs gothic ornament: structural brought over from france, grafting upon the foreign plant their own original additions. germany copied french models much more closely in some cases, while manifesting in others an originality verging on caprice. spain and portugal borrowed from all three, though mostly from france; belgium was hardly more than a province of france in her architecture; while the italians developed no truly gothic style, but grafted gothic decorative details, much altered, on structures in which the gothic principles, both of construction and compo- sition, were wholly ignored. periods. it is convenient to divide the history of the style in all the above countries except italy into three periods— those of development, culmination and decline, or early, fio. . gothic capitals: a, early french, from the sainte chapelle; , th century cap from transept of notre dame; c, flamboyant, from north spire of chartres. developed, and florid. these correspond to the so- called early french, rayonnant and flamboyant phases of gothic architecture in france, and the lancet, decorated and perpendicular in england; these names being derived from the form and tracery of the windows. a history of ornament in the english styles these phases belong roughly to the thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, respect- ively: in france they appear from twenty to fifty years earlier: in germany somewhat later. the ornament of the early period (in france to or ) is the simplest and most vigorous, the imitation of natural forms least literal. in the developed period design and execution are finer, ornament more profuse and more naturalistic, and window tracery (and in england vault-ribbing also) became more important elements in the decorative scheme. in the florid period the styles diverge considerably in the different countries, but in all, the ornament is more complex and often overloaded, and also often more thin, wiry and dry, technical cleverness and minute detail taking the place of restraint and vigor of artistic design. the orna- ment oscillates between the extremes of realism and con- ventionalism. this sequence is illustrated in the three capitals of fig. . structural ornament. every important struc- tural feature was either made ornamental in itself, like the clustered shafts, capitals, tri- forium-arcades, window-tra- ceries, roof-balustrades and water-spouts; or adorned with carved adjuncts and de- fio. . decorative gable over a window, cologne. gothic ornament: structural tails, like the crockets, finials, gablets and tabernacles of pin- nacles and buttresses, or the foli- age and flowers on enriched mold- ings (see plate xvii). in the developed and florid periods, by the operation of a never-fail- ing law of decorative evolution, certain forms and features orig- ;([! inally structural came to be used !f as pure ornament. thus gables,!!; originally used only at the ends of gabled roofs, came to be used j ;j as purely decorative features, adorned with surface or open- work tracery, over doors and win- dows where no such roofs existed (fig. ); in england the vault- ribs, serving in earlier buildings as a framework upon which to build the fillings, became finally fig. . clustered a mere patterning in relief on gothic pieb. the vault-surface; in germany the spire, at first a steep roof over a bell tower, became a gigantic ornament of open tracery and not a roof at all. piers, shafts and columns. except in some of the earlier french and later bel- gian and dutch churches, all the piers were clustered, i see pages , , and note for other examples of this law of devel- opment, and comments upon it. a history of ornament slender shafts being grouped around a central core, sometimes joined to it, sometimes quite separate. these shafts were usually circular, but sometimes pear- shaped, springing from bases at a common level, except in the later examples and carrying elaborate foliated capitals (fig. ). sometimes, in england espe- fio. . romanesque and gothic capitals; a, from bayeux cathedral, , from st. martin des champs, paris. cially, the shafts are belted at intervals with molded bands. vaulting shafts are often sprung from carved corbels high up, instead of bases on the ground, or set on the caps of the main piers. gothic shafts are never carved, but are sometimes painted. capitals display a a great variety of designs, usually employing foliage as their chief adornment. the earlier french capitals generally recall the corinthian type by their bell-shaped core, square abacus with the corners cut off, and volute-like corner crockets, but the abacus is always massive in proportion to the cap and shaft, and the development of the type from the romanesque is gothic ornament: structural evident (fig. ). later capitals have the foliage more complex and more naturalistic in detail (fig. ); the abacus is octagonal or round; in england the plain molded bell-capital without foliage occurs fre- quently, and the corinthian type is lost in the convex wreaths or bunches of foliage in the foliated caps. in the florid period capitals are often omitted, and when i mm ulfil p fio. . gothic bases: early type, fbom halberstadt; late type, fbom rouen. used are often poor in design; they vary between extreme naturalism and capricious convention (figure c). bases show a very interesting progressive develop- ment. the simple attic type of the romanesque styles survives for a while but first loses its corner spurs, then changes gradually, the plinth taking on a constantly in- creasing importance until it becomes a high pedestal, with the moldings above it much reduced and simplified. the lower torus also becomes higher and larger, assum- ing the later phases an ogee or pear-like profile. the corners of the plinth were cut off in many roman- esque bases; in the gothic the plinth (i.e., each member of a complex base) is almost always frankly an octagon a history of ornament or semi-octagon in plan (fig. ). in the later period of the style it is often in two stages, constituting a pedestal rather than a simple base. moldings. the simple roll molding of the romanesque styles is replaced by increasingly complex profiles, in which pear- shaped sections frequently alternate with deep hollows, producing effective contrasts of multiplied narrow lines of light and shadow. in the first two periods the pro- fio. . french pier-arch moldings of three periods. files are sharp and vigorous, and in the pier-arches the grouping of rounds and hollows conforms more or less closely to the stepped profile of the arch-construction. in the florid period the steppings of the arch-section generally disappear in a generally splayed effect. the profiles in this period are less vigorous than in the pre- ceding, the hollows being broad and shallow, the convex moldings smaller, and fine fillets are multiplied, giving at times a thin and wiry appearance to the grouped pro- files (fig. ). enriched moldings are more frequent in english than in french work, though they occur in all the periods in france (especially in late work), england, germany gothic ornament: structural cornice-molding, notre dame, paris. and spain. convex moldings are rarely enriched, but the hollows between them are adorned with leaves, crockets, ball-flowers, and in early english work with pyramid-flowers or "dog- tooth" ornaments. in place of a cornice or corbel-table, the wall (especially in france) was often crowned with a high, deep cavetto filled with standing leaves (fig. ). in the florid period, the french sometimes filled the broad hollows between the finer members of a molding-group with ex- quisitely carved naturalistic vines. this treatment oc- curs in english examples (e.g. the portals of southwell chapter house) in the decorated period. in the fol- lowing (perpendicular) period in england the hollows were more often enriched with widely spaced square rosettes. in both france and ger- many moldings of different profiles were made to cross and intersect in work of the latest phase of the gothic, the intri- cate cutting of their intersec- tions giving occasion for that display of technical cleverness which characterizes that period. vaulting. gothic vaulting is based upon the principle of a framework of ribs supporting the fillings of masonry of fio. . boss: carved vault french. a history of ornament small stones. the rib framework is simple in the early work of all countries, the only ornament being the mold- ings of the ribs and sometimes a carved keystone or boss at their intersections (figure ). in france this simplicity persists nearly to the end (fig. ). in fio. . vaulting, apsidal chapel, beauvais. england the ribs were multiplied by the addition of tier- cerons (figure ) and of subordinate connecting ribs or hemes, and combined into highly ornamental pat- terns ("star" and "net" vaults), with carved bosses at each intersection. this patterning developed finally into "fan vaulting," in which the ribs were purely decora- tive moldings cut in the stones of the inverted semi- conoids of the vaulting (figure , b; a sump- tuously ornate form of stone ceiling, but without that exeter cathedral . lincoln cathedral; half of tower vault fig. gothic ornament: structural clear expression of structure which marked the earlier vaulting. in germany and spain the vault-ribs were, as early as the latter part of the developed period, built to fit predetermined conventional patterns, in which the lines were not always, as they always were in england, true plane curves. the builders in these two countries de- lighted in tours-de-force, displays of cleverness in creat- ing and solving difficult problems of vault-rib construc- tion; but the results are neither so rich nor so pleasing as in england. window tracery. this was one of the most decorative and characteris- tic features of gothic architecture. its development may be followed from the romanesque coupling of win- dows under a discharging arch through successive stages in which the separating pier became a column or a slender chamfered or molded pier of cut stone, while the spandrel above was perforated with a cir- cle; then treated like a thick plate of stone with decoratively cusped or foiled openings cut fig. a. plate tracery, ettoit through it (plate tracery chdbch" fig. a). then the window was further divided into three, four, or more lights by slender molded or shafted mullions, and a history of ornament the space between their pointed-arched heads and the main window-arch filled with circles or geometric pat- terns of stone work, the interest of the design being now transferred from the shapes of the openings to the shapes of the stone work (bar tracery. fig. b). towards the end of the middle period the circular arcs and circles of this type of tracery (which was carried to the highest perfection in the great east and west windows of eng- fio. . bar tracery, meopham church; e, perpendicular tracery, northfleet. land and the great wheel-windows of france) reverse curves were introduced, giving a swaying movement to the lines. in france this is continued through the next period, giving it the name of flamboyant from the flame-like forms of the very intricate tracery patterns used both in arched and circular windows. in england on the contrary there supervened, from about , a rapid change, leading to the perpendicular style of tracery; huge windows being filled with a very mechan- ical, though structurally excellent, system of vertical bars, sometimes crossed by transoms on small flattened gothic ornament: structural arches (fig. c). in germany there was less uni- formity, but a general resemblance to the french flam- boyant forms. these various developments are illus- trated in fig. and plate xxi. noticeable in all developed gothic tracery is the intro- duction of cusps, separating or enclosing foils, also the branching of the moldings, so arranged that the main mullions and circles have a section composed of the ag- gregate of all the subordinate arch—or mullion—mold- fio. . vabieties of cusps. ings which came together in them. the several com- ponent groups of moldings are called orders. cusps may consist of only the inmost molding widened into a point, or of a molding or complete order branching off so as to form a small triangular opening (fig. ). sometimes one of the outer moldings of the arch of a door or window was pointed with cusps terminating in small finials (plate xvii, , shows this treatment ap- plied to a flying buttress-arch in germany). wall and gable tracery. during the course of the developed period the deco- rative richness of the window-tracery led to the repeti- tion of like forms on certain wall-surfaces, upon which they formed ornamental panels framed in the lines of the gothic ornament: structural circles, triangles and quadrilaterals with closed or open cusps predominating. such balustrades are used at the lower edges of roofs as well as for balconies, tower-para- pets and (rarely) stairways (fig. , plate xvii, , ) • they became as complex as other features in the florid period (fig. ) especially in germany, where they often formed veritable geometric puzzles. pinnacles, crockets and pinials. these are as characteristic of the gothic styles as is the tracery. the buttresses—both the clearstory wall- buttresses and the outer buttresses external to the fiide- aisles—were commonly terminated by a tall slender pyramid, square or octagonal in plan, rising from gab- lets crowning two or four faces of the buttress-top, or from minor pinnacles at the corners (plate xvii, , , ). these pinnacles were adorned along the hips or edges with crochets (plate xvii, )—outward-curl- ing leaf-like or flame-like protuberances richly carved; —and terminated in a finial, composed usually of a cen- tral stem ending in a ball or bud and branching out be- low this into four or more crockets, forming a remark- ably effective terminal flower or ornament (plate xvii, , ). crockets (fig. ) are also used to fret the salient edges of the saddleback copings of gables; along the hips of spires; as ornaments to the outer drip-moldings of arches, especially in the florid period; and (rarely) between the clustered shafts in doorways and triforiums. finials, of like character with those on pinnacles, are the usual termination of the summits of gables, and of ogee- a history of ornament arches in late gothic design (plate xviii, ). in early work the crockets, alike those of the finials and of gable-edges or spire-angles, invariably curl outwards, a b fig. . cbockets: a, eably french; b, flamboyant. like the curled-up volutes of fern in the spring (fig. a). later they took on more elaborate foliage- forms with complex, wavy outlines, often in the last period of the style losing all decision and character in their mass and detail (fig. b). crestings of stone, of cast-lead, of terra-cotta were employed to deco- rate the ridges of most of the roofs, on which the covering fio. . gothic cresting. was usually of lead, copper or slate. they were customarily of rather sim- ple design, ending against finials of metal of a more elaborate sort (fig. ). tabernacles. not strictly structural in themselves, these were em- gothic ornament: structural bellishments of structural features or parts, chiefly of buttresses and of the jambs of deep doorways. they consist of a niche or recessed arch to hold a statue, a corbel to support it, and a decorative gable or canopy over it, the canopy often running up into an elaborate spire. the decorative function of the whole was that of breaking up the bare mass of a vertical strip or but- tress, or of a wall, or of the doorway jambs with a deep shadow and the brilliant lights of the statue, and to emphasize the vertical movement of the lines of the whole composition. the canopy was made increasingly elaborate as the style progressed, and in late examples was composed of a bewildering intricacy of minute arches, pinnacles and traceries, the whole forming an extraordinarily rich decoration (figure ). corbels were of frequent occurrence in all the gothic styles, as supports for statues, for vaulting-ribs, for vaulting-shafts and for columns; they were not used, as in romanesque buildings, to support a cornice or corbel- table. they were almost invariably carved with foliage, after the general fashion of the capitals, though some- times in england made very long vertically (e.g. lich- field nave). grotesque heads and human figures ap- pear in the third period; they are rare in the two pre- ceding. a late french corbel and crocket are shown in plate xviii, , . gargoyles. gothic eaves-spouts and those also which projected from the buttresses were invariably carved into the sem- blance of long-necked, vomiting monsters, called gar- soi a history of ornament goyles (plate xvii, ). remarkable skill was dis- played in the composition and anatomy of these gro- tesque monsters. they are among the most striking examples of the decorative-symbolic treatment of purely utilitarian members (figure ). books recommended: as before, bond, dehio and bezold, hartel, violi,et- le-duc. also, g. l. adams: recueil de sculptures gothiques (paris, ).—baudot: la sculpture francaise au moyen-age et a la renaissance (paris, ).—enlart: manuel d'archeologie francaise (paris, ).—a. l. froth- ingham: a history of architecture, vol. iii, iv (new york, ).—l. gonse: l'art gothique (paris, n. d.).—hasak: die romanische und die gotische baukunst; der kirchen- bau; einzelheiten des kirchenbaues (stuttgart, ).—a. hauser: stillehre der architektonischen formen des mit- telalters (vienna, ).—k. a. heideloff: ornamentih des mittelalters (nuremberg, - ).—t. g. jackson: gothic architecture (london, ).—klingenberg: die ornamentale baukunst, etc. (leipzig, n. d.).—c. martin: l'art gothique en france (paris, ).—c. moore: de- velopment and character of gothic architecture (new york, ).—nesfield: specimens of mediaeval architecture (lon- don, ).—pakker: introduction to gothic architecture; glossary of terms in gothic architecture; companion to glossary (london, - ).—a. n. w. pugin: glossary of ecclesiastical ornament and costume (london, ).—m. schmidt: meisterwerke der dekorativen sculptur, xi—xvi jahrhundert (stuttgart, — . this is a german edition of the work listed after chapter xiv under the title musee de sculpture comparee du trocadero).—e. schmuzer: gothische ornamente (berlin, ).—g. g. ungewitter (tr. by mon- icke): gothic model book (london, ); sammlung mit- telalterlicher ornamentik (leipzig, ). chapter xvii gothic caeving and industrial and accessory arts decorative carving and sculpture: foliage. the tradition of the classic acanthus and of its by- zantine modifications, clearly evident in all romanesque carved foliage, gradually disappeared in gothic art. in the second half of the th century the french carvers began to turn for inspiration and suggestion to the com- mon vegetation about them, and developed an entirely new category of foliage-forms. this change was due to the formation of guilds of free or non-monastic ma- sons and carvers who traveled from one site to another to ply their art, untrammeled by the monastic traditions. they were the counterpart in france of the maestri comacini of italy, and their appearance was synchro- nous with the cathedral-building movement in france, to which was chiefly due the impulse toward progress and innovation which produced the gothic style. as viollet-le-duc has pointed out, these artists first con- ventionalized the simple forms of the earliest sprout- ing spring herbage, thick and crisp, suggestive of the new life and energy of nature. the crocket, de- scended no doubt from the corinthian corner-volute, was carved like a thick flattened shoot bearing a globular bunch of uncurling leaves (fig. ). like the cor- i article "sculpture" in "dictionnaire raisonn*" (toi. till), a history of ornament inthian volute, it was the dominant feature of capi- tals, as in fig. ; see also plate xviii, , , . the other leaves were massive and concave in modeling, and all the foliage was made to grow out of the capital fio. . capital, st. mabtin-des-champs, pasis. or other member which bore it (fig. ). as the carver's skill increased, the stiffness of the early conven- tionalism disappeared, and a beautiful type of foliage was evolved, still conventional and thoroughly archi- tectural, but with grace and delicacy of detail, and varied by a closer study of particular plant-types (plate xviii, ). this study led to an increasing natural- ism, to a more and more realistic copying of more com- industrial and accessory arts fig. . corner leaf fbom notre dame, paris. first stage of develop- ment is hardly at all represented. the crocket from wells cathedral (fig. ) is an exception in its resemblance to early- french models. the early english capitals, crockets and corbels of the th century show instead an extraordi- narily beautiful han- dling of minute curl- plex and more mature leaf- types from shrubs and trees, and these were wreathed about the architecture in- stead of seeming to grow out of it (figs. b and ). by the end of the th cen- tury this tendency was being carried to extremes, though with remarkable technical beauty of execution, and thereafter the design oscil- lates between dry conven- tionalism and excessively minute realism (figs. c and ). in england the fig. . french rayoxnaxt capital. a history of ornament fio. . capitals, chapter house of southwell cathedral. ing trefoils, often highly intricate and of marvelous ex- ecution (fig. ). the naturalistic stage is seen in innumerable late thirteenth and early fourteenth cen- tury churches, in which, as in france, the flowers and foliage are applied to the architecture in wreaths and bunches, as in the re- markable doorways of southwell chapter-house (dr. ; fig. ). foliage is scanty in perpendicular work, and the mechanical form of the tudor rose (fig. ) is the most characteristic floral adornment. in crocket, germany there is no systematic de- velopment of foliage design, though there is much very beautiful foliage; it is, however, in great measure copied or imitated from french models. fio. . wells cathedral. industrial and accessory arts figure sculpture. figure sculpture applied to the decoration of build- ings had become almost a lost art during the dark ages, fio. . capital, salisbury cathedral. and the monastic builders of the eleventh century and the first half of the twelfth had only partially and sporadi- cally renewed it. we have already seen, however, that in occasional instances the french sculptors had dis- played great skill in such works as the porches of st. trophime and st. gilles at aries (plate xiv), and the west portal of chartres (figure ), and the widespread use of grotesques had developed both technical and artis- tic ability in the use of the chisel. in the cathedral and church arch- itecture of the gothic period— to —and particularly during fig. . tudor flower. a history of ornament the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, the free develop- ment of art which succeeded the monastic period brought into being an entirely new phase of decorative figure- sculpture. the french cathedrals were people's churches quite as truly as bishops' churches, and their builders made them into picture-bibles in stone. the portals were especially rich in plastic representations of saints and angels, kings, prophets and martyrs, and the figures were modeled with fine regard for their archi- tectural setting. the deep jambs and the central door- pier were adorned with standing figures, often of heroic size, sometimes of great beauty. the great tympana over the doorways bore reliefs of christ or the virgin enthroned amid scenes of life of the virgin, of the last judgment or equally solemn subjects (fig- ure ). the cavernous arches were studded with con- centric ranks of throned and adoring angels. an arcade high up on the facade was filled with figures of crowned kings of france or of judea (fig. ), while from tab- ernacles on buttresses and rood-screens and transept- fronts angels and saints looked down upon the throngs below. the earlier sculpture is the most architectural in character: as the thirteenth century advanced the treatment was more realistic, with more of positive beauty of pose and feature (figure ) reaching its fig. . part of "gallery of kings," amiens cathedral. via. .—reliefs from portal op notre dame fra. .—tomb op abbot stephen op aubagine a history of ornament ency toward minute ornamentation grew, through the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, and as such minute decoration was better adapted for works of less monu- mental scale than for the churches themselves, these minor works became more and more the characteristic masterpieces of the stone-carver's art. the intricacy of the canopy-work with its bewildering network of arches, cusps and pinnacles is only equaled by the perfection and delicacy of the execution. verbal descriptions can give little idea of the marvelous detail of some of these works, and even the illustrations fail to convey a complete im- pression to which the works themselves give rise. the most beautiful of these works are generally the french, though the germans at times press them closely (see figure ), and some even of the french works, as the rood-screens at bourg-en-bresse and alby, are at- tributed to german artists (figure ). wood-carving. choir-stalls offered a specially rich field for the wood- carver's chisel. each seat was provided with a high back usually terminating in a projecting canopy, which in turn was finished with gablets, pin- nacles and a high and complex spire. the arms separating the seats were richly carved, and the f,ot . a m,serere, beverley hinged seat, when cathedral. folded back, dis- industrial and accessory arts closed a grotesque cor- bel, called the "mise- rere" (fig. ). in the later gothic the choir stalls were extra- ordinarily elaborate. other specimens of wood carving are found in the pew-ends of eng- lish churches, with elaborate finials (fig. ); in the bosses and hammer beams of eng- lish wooden ceilings (see fig. ); in chests and furniture for the sacristy, and in the details of half-timbered houses in england, france and germany; as well as in domestic furniture (chests, ta- bles and chairs), espe- cially of the th and th centuries. the details are all derived from the contemporary stone architecture and carving, though modi- fied to suit the material. fig. . pew end, winthobpe church. a history of ornament metal work. iron was costly in the middle ages, and, except for clamps and chainages, and in italy for tie-rods in the vaulting, was rarely used for primary construction. its chief uses were for nails and bolts, for hinges and door-fit- tings, for gates and grilles, and for locks, latches, keys, armor and arms. cast-iron was rarely employed, although a late gothic example is shown in plate xviii, . the medieval wrought iron, especially of france, italy,' ger- many and flanders, shows marvelous skill in forging, decorative effects being produced by splitting, twisting, welding and riveting the bars by scroll-work, rosettes, and repousse or hammered work in sheet metal (fig. ; figures , ). lead was used for crestings and for covering spires and dormers. bronze, brass, copper and silver were handled with skill in the movable furnishings of the church, candelabra, pyxes, monstrances, chalices, cro- ziers, pastoral staves and the like. enamel and jewels fio. . crestino of iron grille, st. sebkin, toulouse. industrial and accessory arts were employed to heighten the richness of these objects. the goldsmith's and silversmith's art derived most of its origins from byzantine art, but departed rapidly from it and developed a style wholly western and gothic. textile ornament. the remains of medieval embroideries, laces and tap- estries are not abundant. there was little richness of dress or textile furnishings except in ecclesiastical dress and among the few who were rich and powerful in church and state, and to a remarkable extent the ec- clesiastical robes and embroideries have disappeared, though they were undoubtedly often of great beauty and even magnificence. those preserved to this day are mostly of the fifteenth century, except a respectable number of spanish and sicilian embroideries and silk damasks of the thirteenth to fifteenth centuries which show a strongly oriental inspiration. tiles. fine pottery was an almost unknown art in western europe in the middle ages except among the moham- medans of spain and sicily. ceramic tiles were, how- ever, used in floors, especially about the altar in france, fig. . french tile pattebns. industrial and accessory arts both for the color scheme and the details, but with much freer handling and frequent use* of foliage and of free abstract design in flourishes, scrolls and interlaces. gold was used with fine effect though sparingly. the name of jean fouquet stands conspicuous in the bril- liant french school of the late fifteenth century. the most notable production of the flemish school was the grimani breviary, now in venice; but every consid- erable collection of manuscripts possesses beautiful ex- amples of the various schools in breviaries, books of hours, psalm-books, chant-books and secular works— chronicles, histories and editions of the classics. fig. fig. . a french medallion window. a history of ornament illustrates a few details of this brilliant and fascinat- ing phase of medieval design; other examples are shown in plate xx. stained glass. of all the arts allied to gothic architecture, that of the stained glass win- dows is the most char- acteristic as a special product of the style. from timid begin- nings in the roman- esque buildings it de- veloped rapidly as the size and splendor of the traceried windows increased. the depth and brilliancy of color attained by the glass- makers of the thir- teenth century pro- vided a new decorative resource for the church-builders and window-designers; a richness and intensity of blues, reds, yellows and greens rivaling the splendor of mo- saic. the mechani- i the germans claim an active production of mosaic glass as early as a.d. at tegernsee (meyer, "ornamentale formenlehre"). fig. . german grisaille. above, from cologne; below, from altenbubo. s , industrial and accessory arts cal imperfections of the early glass made it only the more sparkling, while the heavy leading employed gave a suitable foil to the glowing colors by its black lines which tended to harmonize as well as separate oth- erwise crude juxtapositions of color. the early windows were arranged in medallions, each containing a picture in mosaic, as it were, made up of small units of color separated by the lines of the leading (fig. ). the spandrels between the medallions were filled with quarry- work or foliage in grisaille (lines of a semi-opaque brown pigment fused onto -flif» o-lncc of a nnm plo- . leading op an early french me glass at a com wlnd ws the marriage at cana. paratively low tem- perature). a border of leaves or other conventional units framed the whole. a few such windows have come down from the th century (the earliest stained glass extant is at st. denis, said to be of ), and they continued to be used through the greater part of the thir- teenth century. "jesse-tree" windows and medallion windows entirely composed of foliage, conventional or- nament and grisaille were also common through this century (fig. ). the invention of the yellow stain (stannic oxide) led then to the making of "canopy" win- dows, with large figures standing under elaborate trac- industrial, and accessory arts clasm of the puritans and the havoc of wyatt in the early nineteenth century have left but scanty remains of the old glass. canterbury and york possess fine glass and there are a few good pieces still left in salis- bury cathedral. very late examples are to be seen in king's college chapel, cambridge, and in st. jacques at liege. the best german glass is in the cathedrals of cologne, altenburg and strassburg (fig. ). figs. and illustrate the leading of the early glass,—a most important element in the decorative effect of the window. with the later years of the fifteenth century the gothic style approached its extinction by the rapidly- spreading art of the renaissance. but while it had reached the final limit of structural development, and architecture was sensibly declining, the arts of ornament were still at the highest point of richness and of technical perfection (figures , ). this splendor of minute decoration, of complex tracery, realistic pictorial sculp- ture, sumptuous embroidery and showy furniture was, however, the final coruscation of an expiring flame. the decorative details of the style long resisted the in- vasion of the renaissance style from italy, in france, england, germany and spain. but the new style was more than a fashion; it was but one symptom of a funda- mental change of spirit of the artistic point of view, of civilization and ideals, and by the middle of the six- teenth century gothic art had passed away. chapter xviii paeticulae schools of gothic ornament i. french and english in the general discussion of gothic ornament in the last two chapters, while the chief attention was given to the developments in france, many references were made to the diverging practice of the english, german and spanish schools. this chapter and the following will be devoted to a more detailed treatment of the several national styles or sub-styles of gothic decorative art. french gothic ornament. the gothic style in france may be considered as lasting from the beginning of notre dame at paris in , to the accession of francis i in . it is cus- tomary to divide this period into three divisions or periods, the early french, from to or there- about; the rayonnant, to , and the flam- boyant, to . these are somewhat arbitrary divisions, as the progress from one stage and phase of development to another, whether in window-tracey, carv- ing or stained glass, was continuous and gradual. through all this development french gothic ornament was marked by certain characteristics which distinguish it from the english and other national styles. schools of gothic ornament finials, vaulting-bosses and the like (fig. ). surface- carving is seldom employed. the rinceau survives in early work in occasional pilaster-like vertical bands and horizontal lintels (fig. ), but passes out of use very early in the thirteenth century. figure sculpture. fig. . carved vertical rinceau, notre dame, paris. fic. . boss from vault of sainte chapelle. the free figure- sculpture of the great portals of cathedrals has already been al- luded to (page ). the throned angels in the portal arches, the standing figures of apostles, martyrs and saints in the deep jambs (figure ), the reliefs on the pedes- tal courses of the jambs (fig. ) constitute a combination of deeply significant and artistically appropri- ate sculpture never elsewhere equaled, be- fore or since (see a history of ornament ante, page and figure ; also figs. , ). grotesques often mingle effectively with carved foliage, as in figure from chartres cathedral. very striking and nobly decorative also are the colossal angels standing in the pinnacled tabernacles surmounting the but- tresses of reims cathe- dral. the culmination of minute realism, alike in statues and reliefs, came in the fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries, in choir-en- closures like those in amiens cathedral (figure ) and chartres, and in choir- screens and tombs, as in the famous examples in the brou church at bourg- en-bresse. in no other country did figure-sculpture play so important a part in the decorative system. equally appropriate and decorative with these archi- tectural sculptures was the minor decorative figure- work in wood and ivory, as evidenced, for example, in the beautiful ivory triptych from the municipal library of amiens, of which figure illustrates the central panel. tracery. in the early french period the tracery was at first fio. . reliefs from base of postal, notre dame. fig. .—two figures from portal, amiens cathedral fig. .—ivory triptych, in amiens library french, xvth century schools of gothic ornament to affect the design of window-tracery, by the substitu- tion of flowing and waving lines for the simpler geo- metric combinations of circles, pointed arches and cusps which had hitherto satisfied all requirements for over a century. the "ogee" arch was substituted for the arch formed by simple circular arcs, and the flame-like forms which result from dividing a circle through the center by a wave-line, became almost the dominant motive in the tracery-design. the resulting style of design, though less logical structurally than the earlier geo- metric types of tracery, was more flexible and capable of a greater variety of combinations. it dominated the entire architecture of france from to , and covered the exteriors of churches with an extraordinary wealth of traceries, both of openwork and of blind or wall-tracery (figures , , ; figs. , ). it was especially effective in the rose windows, as in the front of st. ouen, rouen, the fronts of rouen cathedral, the sainte chapelle, paris, tours, amiens, and reims cathedrals, and the transepts of beauvais. in several cases these flamboyant roses were inserted in earlier facades (amiens, sainte chapelle). the front of rouen cathedral, long unfinished, but com- pleted within recent years, is the most elaborate and splendid example of this flamboyant design; next to it stands the exquisite little church of st. maclou at rouen; while the north spire of chartres cathedral, and the charming little church at louviers (figure ), are others among many examples of the marvelous rich- ness and delicacy of which the style was capable. the origin of this change in tracery design is gen- a history of ornament erally now ascribed to english influence. a considerable part of northern france was in english hands in the four- teenth century, and (as will be later shown) the english had before the middle of that century developed their "flowing" or "curvilinear" tracery. while they soon ex- changed this for the more rigid "perpendicular" tracery, the french developed the suggestion of the wavy line to its utmost possible results of decorative splendor. stained glass. the development of the art of stained glass was so closely associated with the progress of gothic architec- ture that fergusson, in his "history of architecture," claims it as the one exclusively distinguishing feature of the gothic style, which might properly be called "the stained glass style." the romanesque churches, with their thick walls and small windows, offered little scope or suggestion for pictured windows. the gothic style, with its concentrated supports and gradual reduction of wall areas, developed a progressive increase in the size and loftiness of its windows, and this progress stimu- lated the art of pictured and decorative glass by giving it greater opportunities. indeed, the larger the win- dow, the more necessary became colored glass to reduce the excessive glare; while the more splendid the glass and the deeper and richer its tone, the greater was the tendency to enlarge the windows. the structural progress of the french gothic style was thus closely associated with the progress of window decoration by colored glass. while the french led in this, as in so many other branches of decorative art, and while more fig. .—flamboyant tracery, church of st. pierre, louviers a history of ornament and it is likely that not a few were painted blue with gilt stars. from vestiges of the original painting dis- covered in the sainte chapelle at paris a complete in- terior decoration in color was carried out in that chapel about . the result is gorgeous, but the opaque colors of the brilliantly painted walls suffer under the glare of transmitted color through the windows, and this b fig. . early english carving, a, from church at stone, kent; , lincoln cathedral; c, ely cathedral. probably explains why interior coloration was not more general after the th century. the essays in color- decoration by viollet-le-duc in the chapels of notre dame are far less brilliant, but also less interesting. in conclusion, it should be noted that the french handling of decorative detail of all kinds was in general more logical, more strictly architectural, than in other countries, with the possible exception of england. ele- gance and propriety of design are combined in an eminent degree in nearly all french gothic ornament. schools of gothic ornament fig. . decorated capital: beverley cathedral. english gothic ornament. the english work of the first two periods, as com- pared with the french, shows a general predominance of decorative over structural £ conceptions, but without sacri- fice of structural propriety. it displays less of severe logic, but often more of charm; less vigor, but often greater delicacy and richness. english cathedral in- teriors, while far less lofty and majestic than the french, are generally more ornate, richer in the play of light and shade, often more beautiful. all the details are on a smaller scale, and re- markable effects are produced by mul- tiplied repetition. the moldings are finer and more num- erous, the shaft-clus- terings more com- plex, the carved orna- ment more varied and abundant (plate xx, -; figures , , ). on the other hand, the exteriors were far less ornate than the french; the figure- mill fig. . a, finial, wells chapter house, b, crocket, beverley. s s schools of gothic ornament fig. a. "curvilinear" panels in wood. richly adorned with figures in niches, as at exeter and canterbury. very rich in fig- ure-sculpture were also some of the great th-century reredoses of english cathed- rals, as those of winchester, st. saviour's at southwark (cathedral), and some others. mention has already been made in chapter xvii of the "angel choir" of lincoln, il- lustrated as to its sculptured triforium-spandrels in fig- ure . woodwork of all sorts the english excelled in, especially in the th and th centuries. fro. . "poppy head." a history of ornament fw. . plate tracery, lil- linoton, northants. the wooden choir-screens, choir-stalls, pew-ends, font- covers and the like, were often of great beauty (see ante, fig. ), with elabo- rate surface-tracery, can- opy-work, and carved gro- tesques. very character- istic are the "poppy-head" finials to the pew-ends. fig. illustrates part of a carved wooden screen, of which there are many in english parish churches; fig. a, th-century surface-paneling in wood; fig. a poppy-head finial. but the greatest glory in the later woodworkers was the oaken ceilings of halls and churches; these will be discussed later. moldings were generally richer, more minute and more varied than the french, more subtile in profile, and more often enriched, as al- ready explained fig. ). the english composed their groups of gothic moldings so as to produce successions of deep undercut hollows contrasting with boldly pro- jecting roll-moldings or bow- tels. there was continuous increase in richness and com- plexity until , after which there is observable a fig. . east window, raunds, northants. schools of gothic ornament falling-off in vigor and effectiveness: the hollows are flatter and broader, the rolls and bowtels less vigorous in their contrast with the hollows. the bowtel—a roll- molding with a slightly salient lip or fillet, giving it an almost pear-shaped section—is peculiar to english archi- fio. . flowing or "curvilinear" tracery; a, ithlingboro', northants; b, over, cambridgeshire; c, llttle addinoton, northants. tecture. another noticeable english feature is the label or drip-molding over the pier-arches in church in- teriors, as well as over exterior arches, doors and win- dows; the french confined this feature wholly to ex- teriors. the english never affected the intricate inter- secting moldings of late french and german gothic art. schools of gothic ornament long pendants (retro-choir of peterboro; cloisters of gloucester; king's college chapel, henry vii's chapel at westminster, etc.). the decorative splendor of the fig. a. open-timber ceiling, lavexham church, suffolk. english vaulting is of the highest order, and nothing equal to these vaults is found in any other school of gothic design (figure ). no less remarkable are the superb oaken ceilings borne on huge arched trusses, of which the highest de- velopment is the hammer-beam type as illustrated in the schools of gothic ornament books recommended: as before, dehio and bezold, fbothingham, moose, parkeh, simpson. also for english gothic, architectural association sketch book (london).—atkinson and atkin- son: gothic ornaments selected from various cathedrals and churches in england (london, ).—f. bond: gothic architecture in england; cathedrals of england and wales; wood carvings in english churches; fonts and font covers; screens and galleries in english churches; westminster ab- bey; introduction to english church architecture (oxford and london, — ).—brandon: analysis of gothic archi- tecture (london, ); open timber roofs of the middle ages (london, ).—t. t. bury: remains of ecclesiastical woodwork (london, ).—j. k. colling : english mediaval foliage; details of gothic architecture; gothic ornaments (london, - ).—e. a. freeman: an essay on the origin and development of window tracery in england (lon- don, n. d.).—c. moore: the mediaxal church architecture of england (new york, ).—paley: a manual of gothic mouldings (london, ).—t. rickman: an attempt to dis- criminate the styles (london, ).—e. sharpe: mouldings of the six periods; treatise on the rise and progress of win- dow tracery in england (london, ).—spring gardens association sketch book (london).—consult also monographs on particular churches and cathedrals. s chapter xix particular schools of gothic ornament ii. german, spanish, italian german gothic ornament. cleverness of technical execution and a tendency towards displays of skill rather than purity of design mark the german gothic work. there is much borrow- ing from french models and cologne, the greatest of all gothic cathedrals, is clearly modeled after amiens and beauvais. most of the german gothic details of the first two periods are based on french types. in the naturalistic rendering of the leaves of the oak, maple, vine, etc., the german cleverness of technic found free scope, and in the th century began to show independ- ence of french models. there is abundant use of the grotesque, in which a very germanic broad humor often takes the place of the french artistic refinement. the moldings generally resemble the french. in the florid period intricate intersections of moldings of dif- ferent profiles seem to have given special delight to the german stone-cutters and wood-carvers because of the technical difficulty of their execution (figures , , ). i it is difficult to distinguish between some of the french, german and flemish work of the late gothic period. the strassburg pulpit may be either a french or a german work. fig. .—vaulting, cathedral of salamanca schools of gothic ornament burg, etc. in principle german glass is like the french, but with much more of grisaille, foliage and geometric patterning, and less of figures until the th century, when a pictorial style came in with much painting in place of mosaic or pot-metal coloring, and a very frequent use of figure-sub- jects. in the minor arts—wood-carv- ing, metal-work, etc.—the ger- mans produced much that is in- teresting, generally marked by the same qualities of fantastic ca- price, quaint humor and technical excellence, to which attention has already been called in other de- partments of art (figs. , ; figure ). spanish gothic ornament. medieval christian art in spain was subject to diverse influences, which prevented a homogeneous organic development of style, but helped to impart to it a highly picturesque character. the con- temporary moorish art stimulated the tendency towards surface ornamentation, while german, french and even english characteristics occur in not a few cases. the spanish fondness for unrestrained exuberance of orna- ment overrode the structural logic of gothic design and fio. . german late gothic cabvino. a history of ornament produced, in the fifteenth century especially, composi- tions of extraordinary and fantastic richness (figure ). spanish gothic ornament is especially rich about the doorways of churches and in the arcades of cloisters and patios of the th and th centuries. tabernacle work, tracery and cusping of great complexity, and heraldic escutcheons form the chief resources of such decoration as is not directly inspired from foreign models. the traceried spires of burgos suggest german work; the general decorative details of the facade suggest both amiens and ratisbon. the in- fio. . mudejar decoration. terior decoration of this and other churches is hard to classify or formulate, it is so varied and so capricious in character, though almost always effective (figure ). vault decoration fol- lowed in spain no well-defined principle, but in its use of multiple ribs resembles the german rather than the eng- lish gothic. the rib-patterns though often designed as abstract decorations rather than as a structural frame- work (figure ), are nevertheless always true ribs, not mere moldings carved out of the masonry as in eng- lish fan-vaulting. an occasional admixture of moor- ish details with the gothic (fig. ) produces what is called the mudejar style. window tracery is of less importance in spain than fig. .—patio (court) of palace op the infantado, guadalajara fig. .—interior of chapel of the condestabile, burgos cathedral schools of gothic ornament in more northern countries because of the small size of windows required in a hot climate; on the other hand, tracery as a surface decoration is carried to the extreme of elaborate complexity. a striking characteristic frequently met with in span- ish decorative work is the effective way in which the most fanciful and overwrought ornamentation is brought into close contrast with the most severely plain surfaces, and minute detail with grandeur of scale. italian gothic ornament: the system. the principles of design that dominated the gothic styles of western europe never found acceptance in italy. the structural logic of the french and eng- lish builders and their system of ribbed vaulting, isolated supports and external buttresses were foreign to italian traditions and ideals. the opportunist methods of the italian romanesque builders and the persistent tradi- tions of roman design, with its pilasters, round arches, cornices and acanthus leaves, were more in accord with italian taste. when the intercourse between french, german and italian chapters of the benedictine and cistercian orders began to make the splendid church architecture of the west known to the italians, the re- sult was only a very inadequate attempt to add some of the superficial details of that architecture to buildings constructed after the traditional romanesque fashion. pointed arches, steep gables, pinnacles, finials and crockets, and tracery strangely modified or travestied, were applied to buildings wholly italian in design, with- out reference to the principles underlying the design and a history of ornament use of these details in the west (figure ). each building was conceived of as a walled enclosure—some- times vaulted, sometimes roofed with wood—upon which to spread decoration, not as an organic structure to be made decorative in itself. the form and outline of a church facade had no necessary relation to the form of fio. . detail from portal or cathedral, lucca: carved rijtceau and marble inlay. the church behind it; it was a screen, a surface to be ornamented like a frontispiece (figure ). the flanks might or might not be similarly adorned. the interior provided areas for mural paintings. the ma- terials for exterior decoration were round and pointed windows, gables, pinnacles, pilaster-strips, panels, sta- tues, colored marble, inlays, mosaic, anything that would produce patterns in light and shade, form and color (plate xxii). the facades of sienna cathedral ( ) and orvieto ( ), and the flanks and east end schools of gothic ornament of the duomo at florence ( - ) illustrate this conception of the relations of architecture and ornament. the superb campanile at florence ( - ) by giotto, gaddi and talenti, is its most perfect embodiment in the admirable harmony of the ornament with the struc- fig. s . capital from a tomb in sta. chiara, naples. tural lines and mass (plate xxii). polychromy rather than light and shade was the chosen medium of decoration; the use of gothic forms was a concession to fashion which prevented a truly rational development of style. in the works just mentioned and countless others, black, red, green, yellow and white marbles, in panels, stripes and inlays, are mingled with pseudo- gothic and half-classic details. the roman tradition refused to die (fig. ), and corinthian capitals (fig. ), the attic base, round arches with archivolts, acanthus leaves, rinceaux and moldings of roman pro- a history of ornament file, are used with no sense of their incongruity with pointed arches, twisted shafts, crockets and tracery. architectural details. all the gothic forms are capriciously varied. the most notable single feature is the spirally twisted shaft, fio. . tomb in san antonio, padua. frequently used as a mullion in subdivided openings, and as a jamb-shaft in recessed doorways. it is clearly a survival from romanesque practice (fig. ; plate xxii, , ). mosaic and inlay the italians could never give up, and as their gothic decoration was pre- eminently a decoration of surfaces, inlaid bands and panels of colored marbles in geometric patterns appear perfectly in place alongside of gothic pinnacles and trac- ery (figure ). the tracery was rarely—except in venice and in a few churches built by foreign artists— designed as a structure to be built up in stone after the true gothic fashion; it was rather a surface of stone to be schools of gothic ornament perforated and carved, as in the duomo windows and the or san michele at florence (figure ). in venice, however a remarkable and more truly structural type of tracery was de- veloped in the th cen- tury in secular build- ings; first in the majes- tic arcades of the doge's palace, and then in pri- vate palace facades, in a style singularly vigorous and original (fig. ). the triforium tracery of san martino (cathe- dral) at lucca ( ), has much of the western character. that of milan cathedral ( —) is presumably of german design. minor works. in these the italian decorative genius found its most congenial expression. tombs, altars, chapels, shrines, ciboria, choir-stalls, fountains and pavements afforded free scope for italian fancy and love of color. in these inlay and mosaic, cosmati-work (see ante page ) and surface decoration were perfectly appropriate. the al- tar of the church of or san michele, florence, by orcagna (figure ); the tombs of the scaligers in verona (figure ); wall-tombs and canopy-tombs in venice and elsewhere, are not surpassed by works of like purpose anywhere. a history of ornament decorative fainting. the remarkable schools of painting which arose and flourished in florence in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries and in sienna in the fourteenth, fall outside the field of a history of ornament, except as to the sub- ordinate details of their mural decorations. the cul- mination of this school is seen in the frescoes of giotto ( - ), especially in the church of s. francesco at assisi, and of his followers, the gaddi, etc. the decorations of vault-ribs and of borders of pictured panels on walls and vaults show a mingling of classic survivals with geometric details evidently inspired from cosmati work and geometric inlays (fig. ). the persistence of classic rinceaux and acanthus leaves ap- pears often like a foretaste or an- ticipation of the renaissance, in- stead of a lingering reminiscence of traditions never quite lost since the days of the roman empire. carvings like those on the man- dorla door of the florentine duomo (cir. ; fig. ) are evidences of the vitality of those traditions, which the foreign gothic fashion could not wholly drive out. other painted decorations, as in s. anastasia, verona and s. andrea, vercilli, and the cloisters of the fig. . detail from the mandorla doob. florence cathedral. fia. .—carved traceby, ob san michele, florence fig. .—detail, painted wall and vault, santa croce, florence schools of gothic ornament spanish chapel of sta. maria novella at florence, are of a more distinctly gothic character. the upper chapel of sta. maria in the palazzo pubblico at sienna is another noted example. wood and metal. choir-stalls and furniture offered abundant oppor- tunity for the decorative skill of the italian wood-carv- ers, who often combined wood-inlay or intarsia with their carving. but so many of these medieval wood- carvings were removed to be replaced in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries with the works of the renaissance fig. . capitals, doge's palace, venice. a history of ornament artists, that this phase of italian medieval art is less im- pressive than some others. a single example is shown in figure from molfetta; it shows a curious survival of earlier tradition in the almost romanesque aspect of the animal reliefs. there are a number of fine medieval iron grilles in italian churches, and the grilles surround- ing the tombs of the scaligers (figure ) are elegant examples of this form of art. the foregoing paragraphs have sketched only in the barest outline the gothic ornament of italy. the whole country is a vast museum of decorative art of all periods, —for its people, from the days of ancient rome to our own, have always been decorators first of all, and an encyclopaedic volume would be required to treat ade- quately the history of their achievements in the decora- tive arts. conclusion. with the closing years of the fourteenth century in italy, and a century later in western and northern eu- rope, the gothic style began to be extinguished by the rapidly-developing and widely-spreading art of the renaissance. architecture had already reached the final limit of its structural development under the gothic system, and was sensibly declining in power and grandeur. but, as we have seen, a splendid decorative flowering accompanied this decline in structural origi- nality, and reached its highest level of richness and tech- nical perfection in the fifteenth century, in france, eng- land, germany and spain. this splendor of minute decoration, of complex tracery, realistic pictorial sculp- fig. .—detail, altar in ob san fig. .—detail from stalls, michele, florence molfetta cathedral schools of gothic ornament ture, sumptuous embroidery and showy furniture was, however, the final coruscation of an,expiring flame. in italy, meanwhile, the new flame of the renaissance had been kindled and had been growing in brilliancy and spreading as it grew brighter. the western arts long resisted the italian invasion; they refused to kindle from this new flame, to copy the new fashion. but the new style was more than a fashion; it was the expression of a fundamental change of spirit, of a new artistic point of view and attitude, of a new civilization and new ideals. the old order was passing away, and by the middle of the sixteenth century gothic art was dead. books recommended: as before, adamy, dehio and bezold, hasak, frothing- ham, ungewitter. also, for the german gothic, boisseree: histoire et description de la cathedrale de cologne (munich, ).—foerster, denkmale deutscher baukunst (leipzig, - ).—hartel: architektonische details and ornament der kirchlichen baukunst (berlin, ).—rlingenbebg: die ornamentale baukunst (leipzig, n. d.).—e. ausm werth: kunstdenkmaler der christlichen mittelalters in den rheinlan- den (leipzig, ).—for the spanish gothic, lamperez y romea: historia de la arquitectura cristiana espanola, etc. (madrid, - ).—monumentos arquitectonicos de espana (madrid).—d. robebts: sketches m spain (london, ).—smith: sketches m spain (london, ).—g. e. street: gothic architecture in spain (new ed., london, ).—waring: architectural studies in burgos (london, ).—waring and mac uoid: examples of architectural art in italy and spain (london). for the italian gothic, cummings: a history of architec- ture in italy (boston, ).—gbuneb: terra-cotta archi- tecture of north italy (london, ).—king: study book of mediaeval art (london, ).—nesfield: specimens of a history of ornament mediaeval architecture (london, ).—schultz: denkmaler der kunst des mittelalters m unteritalien (dresden, n. d.).— g. e. street: brick and marble architecture in the middle ages in n. italy (london, ).—waring: the arts con- nected with architecture in central italy (london, ). list of plates i. savage ornament: polynesian . carved window-head, new zealand (after pho. in a. m. n. h.). . detail, new zealand paddle-handle (after o. j.). . detail, new zealand canoe (after racinet). , . hawaiian stamped cloth (after o. j.). . detail, new zealand paddle-handle (after o. j.). . tattooed mummy-head, new zealand (after o. j.). . samoan grass cloth, string decoration (a. m. n. h.). . new zealand grass cloth (a. m. n. h.). . new zealand club (racinet). . scratched pattern on a tongan club, new guinea (after a. c. h.). . hawaiian stamped cloth (after o. j.). . new zealand club (after glazier). -. from a new guinea spatula (after a. c. h.). . detail, handle of new zealand paddle of ; faces and figures. . new zealand club (a. m. n. h.). . frigate-bird ornament, new guinea (after a. c. h.). . frigate-bird scrolls. new guinea (after a. c. h.). . samoan fan (a. m. n. h.). . new zealand stamped cloth (after o. j".). . blade of new zealand ceremonial paddle (after o. j.). . scratched ornament on pipe, new guinea (after a. c. h.). . carving from new zealand canoe (racinet). . painted eaves boards, new zealand (after pho. in a. m. n. h.). ii. savage ornament: american . bolivian cloth. . from temple of uxmal, mexico (racinet). . mexican terra-cotta head. . indian basketry patterns. . ancient mexican pottery border. . bolivian hanging jar. . sculptured stele or pillar, uxmal. . mexican jar with spiral. . mexican serpent jar. . neck of mexican jar: pseudo-antliemions. . mexican bowl; spirals and zigzags. . washoe basket (after print in yale neict). . mexican duck jar. i t. peruvian gold disk. . mexican platter with grotesque. . peruvian platter with snake ornaments. . carving from a mexican "throwing stick." . peruvian cloth, toucan pattern. . mexican pipe-bowl, carved stone. . prow of alaskan war canoe. . stern of alaskan war canoe. all the above, except and , are original sketches from ob- jects in the american museum of natural history- new york; by miss g. k. hamlin; the rest by the author. iii. egyptian ornament - . painted lotus borders from tombs (chiefly after p. d'a.). - . all-over patterns from tomb ceilings (after p. d'a. and p. & c). . hathoric capital and entablature, temple of nectanebo, phila? (after p. & c). . column, campaniform type. . lotus-bundle column, temple of thothmes iii, karnak (after p. & c). - . all-over patterns from tomb ceilings (after meyer and p. d'a.). . floral capital, ptolemaic, from phila; (after p. d'a.). , . circle all-over patterns (after p. d'a.). . palm capital, temple of edfu (after o. j.). . lobed lotus capital from the theban oasis (after o. j.). . vulture with plumes of royalty; from ceiling of a hypo- style hall (after p. d'a.). , . imbri patterns (after dolmetsch). . vulture or hawk in gold and enamel (p. & c). . enamel rosette for inlay (in metropolitan museum). . carved perfume-spoon of wood (meyer). . scarabeeus or beetle. piate ffil egyftcam ornamkmt iiia egyptian' ornament . various lotus and other borders from tombs (chiefly after prisse d'avennes and dolmetseh). . campaniform column, from ramesseum. . lotus-bud clustered column, luxor. . all-over patterns painted in tombs (after dolmetseh, prisse d'avennes and perrot and chipiez). . ptolemaic capitals, hathoric and floral from phil* (after prisse d'avennes and owen jones). . ptolemaic capitals, lotus and palm, from theban oasis and edfu (as above). . feathers as insignia (after owen jones). , . imbrications (dolmetseh). . floral ornaments (after c. h. walker). . furniture, in part from tomb paintings (after meyer). . wooden shrine (dolmetseh). . detail from facade of tomb (after perrot and chipiez). . utensils and jewelry. illustrations not otherwise designated are from original draw- ings by the author. v. greek ornament, painted: chiefly on pot- tery . anthemions, black on red. . dish, geometric or dipylon period (p. & c). , . palmettes, black and brown on red. . framed anthemions red on black. . palmette or framed anthemion and "lotus" motive: black and brown on red. . hydria, early fifth century (art pour tous). . oblique anthemions, black on red. . anthemions and fruits. . double palmette-and-lotus band: red on black. . anthemion pattern, from an apulian vase in new york. , . vine bands, red on black. . ivy band, black on red. , . small vertical laurel and ivy bands. . painted terra cotta antefix (incorrectly labeled as of mar- ble), athens. . hydria, fine period. . painted marble antefix. . framed anthemions, red on black. . foliated scroll or rinceau, on a late apulian vase. . anthemions, black on red. . vertical vine band. the above illustrations are from various sources: owen jones, kachel, art pour tous, lau, and original sketches from the object. vi. greek ornament, painted: pottery and architecture , , . "vitruvian" waves and scrolls. , , , . various fret or meander bands. , . anthemions, red on black. . imbrications. . flower band (lotuses?). . lotus-bud band. , . plant and vine ornaments. . egg-and-dart and laurel band. , , , . anthemions and palmettes, black on red. , , , , . anthemion bands, red on black. , . large anthemion ornaments, black on red. , . late painted decorations, apulian. , , . pairyted guilloches on terra-cotta strips and moldings. , - . polychrome decorations of architectural members. nos. , , , , , are from drawings by the author after owen jones and kachel; , , from drawings by the late prof. m. k. kress of columbia university; is from perrot and chipiez; the rest from the late prof. w. r. ware's "greek or- nament." vii. gbeek ornament, architectural . carved pediment rineeau, from one of the "sidon" sar- cophagi at constantinople. . marble antefix. supposedly from the parthenon. . carved finial of choragic monument of lysicrates, athens: restored. . typical carved lotiform motive, from the erechtheion. . carved anthemion on an ionic cymatium. . doric order of the parthenon. . ionic capital from the erechtheion. . moldings from the erechtheion: water leaf, bead-and- reel, and egg-and-dart. . ionic order of the erechtheion. . capital from eleusis (after meyer). . anta-cap from the erechtheion (meyer). . greek corinthian volutes. , . stele heads from athens, fourth century. . corinthian capital from the choragic monument of lysic- rates: restored. all the figures on this plate are from original drawings by the author except and which are taken by permission from meyer's "handbook of ornament"; and , from an unidentified source. viii. roman ornament, the orders . doric order, thermse (baths) of diocletian. . composite order from the arch of titus. . ionic order from the temple of fortuna virilis. . corinthian order, temple of castor and pollux. . middle band of architrave, temple of castor and pollux. . greco-roman corinthian order of temple of "vesta" (so- called) at tivoli. . composite capital, thermae of caracalla. . unidentified corinthian pilaster capital; late greek or greco-roman. . enriched attic base in capitoline museum (after meyer). . enriched corinthian base in baptistery of constantine (after meyer). . enriched corinthian base from temple of concord (meyer). all the figures on this plate are from original drawings by the author, based on various authorities ( is after a photograph), ex- cept which is taken directly from meyer's "handbook of orna- ment." plate vml ix. roman ornament, carving . taenia molding, arch of the silversmiths. , . moldings between architrave bands, temple of vespasian (from photographs of french restorations). . semicircular panel in court of mattei palace, rome, with rinceaux and rosettes; its source is unknown (after vulliamy). . detail from border of a silver platter (after kachel). . rinceau, from temple of vespasian. . bucrane, from an altar (after tatham). . fragments from forum of trajan in lateran museum (after a photograph). , . details from so-called "florentine tablet" (after kachel). . enriched ove, temple of vespasian (after an old french lithograph). . pilaster fragment in villa medici, rome (from cast in co- lumbia university). . oak-leaf and rosette band (unidentified; after an old french lithograph). . pilaster fragment with double rinceau, in palazzo fano, rome. all the above illustrations are from drawings by the author. the sources of and cannot be verified. x. roman ornament, minor arts . cinerary urn in british museum (after glazier). . silver crater from hildesheim (meyer, after kachel). . silver patera from hildesheim (after kachel). . marble hydria from pompeii (after photograph). . bronze saucepan, naples museum (meyer). . cinerary chest and urn in vatican museum (after piranesi). . bronze-tripod in berlin museum (after meyer). . marble support or stand in villa borghese, rome (aftev piranesi). !). bronze tripod, naples museum (after meyer). . candelabrum on triangular pedestal in vatican museun (after piranesi). , . marble table legs, vatican museum (after meyer). . bronze candelabrum base, naples museum (after engrav- ing in "the workshop"). all the illustrations on this p'ate are from the author's drawings, based on the sources indicated. xi. pompeiian ornament . detail from temple of isis (r. paufve after zahn). . from a painted wall in naples museum (r. paufve, after niecolini). . from house of marcus lucretius (h. w. haefele, after niecolini). . painted border (r. paufve, after zahn). . from house of the vestals (author, after zahn). . frieze in temple of isis (author, after zahn). . fragment of stucco relief from excavation near villa farnesina, rome (author, after photograph). . from a wall not now extant, in pompeii (h. w. haefele, after niecolini). . detail of pompeiian floor mosaic (r. paufve, after zahn?). . figure in stucco relief, from excavation near villa farne- sina, rome (author, after photograph). , . details from pompeiian floor mosaics (h. w. haefele). xii. byzantine ornament, carved . capital, impost, mosaic and marble paneling, hagia sophia, constantinople. . spandrel with surface carving in marble, hagia sophia, constantinople. . "basket" capital and impost block, san vitale, ravenna. . pier and cap in front of st. mark's, venice, from st. john of acre. . inlaid capital and impost block, st. mark's- venice. , . details from bronze doors of the vlth century, hagia sophia. constantinople. . italo-byzantine silver chest in museo n'azionale- florence. . puteal (perforated parapet), san vitale, ravenna. . panel from crypt of st. mark's, venice; xth century. all the above illustrations are from photographs or photo-prints. xiii. byzantine ornament, mosaic . mosaic detail, hagia sophia, constantinople. . spandrel and capital, gallery arcade of hagia sophia, constantinople. , . details of mosaic from hagia sophia, constantinople. . detail of mosaic in st. george, salonika. , , , . details of mosaic from hagia sophia, constantinople. , , . mosaic details from san lorenzo fuori le mura, rome. , . details of floor mosaic in san marco, rome. of the above illustrations nos. i, , - a're from student- drawings by s. y. ohta, after prang and salzenberg; and from student-drawings by h. j. burke; , , and are repro- duced by permission from prang's plates of historic ornament; and is are from measured drawings by the author. xiv. romanesque ornament, french . double capital from la dalbade, toulouse, in the toulouse museum. . double capital from church of notre dame at chalons- sur-marne. , . details from central portal of church of st. gilles, near aries. . capital from church of st. pierre-le-moutier. . carved rosette, from portal of church at moissac. . carved tympanum from a house at reims. . rosette (unidentified). . detail from porte ste. anne, cathedral of notre dame, paris. . fragment of frieze from portal of church of st. gilles, near aries. . carved monster from portal of church at moissac. all the illustrations on this plate are reproduced from photo- graphic post cards of casts in the museum of comparative sculpture of the trocadero, paris. ratem romaneswe oejmament french. idoubk q^^. ^ ibadetmk>ux.(ktuioustmuseam) zdoutte&ptmmrdomcdecholoia jurmome. fbrchojsgihatfrla) -f (fatal from srerrek/ioutier. fbith ofjt.gilles (atk& xv. anglo-norman and celtic ornament . voluted capitals from harmston church, lines (after bond). . grotesque and scrolls, shobdon church, herefordshire (after rickman). . "scalloped"-type capitals, new shoreham church (after bond). . anglo-norman anthemion ornament (unidentified). . capital, canterbury cathedral (after rickman). . peterboro choir, two bays (illustration by author in van rensselaer, "english cathedrals"). . zigzag arch-ornament from malmesbury abbey (after parker). . star-flower on an arch in romsey abbey (after rickman). . anglo-norman cushion capital (unidentified; c. u. student' drawing). . billet or checker molding from winchester cathedral (after parker). . anthemion ornament from hereford cathedral. . initial p, from book of kells (after sullivan). is. detail from celtic cross at ruthwell, ireland (after champreys). . interlace from cross at mugle, ireland. . interlace border from an irish ms. (after racinet). . the south cross at aheny, ireland (after champreys). all the above illustrations are from the author's drawings ex- cept , which is an unidentified student's drawing. xvi. german romanesque ornament . carved pier in church at st. jak, hungary (from a draw- ing by stein). . twelfth century capital from cathedral at nauniburg (c. u. student-drawing). . twelfth century capital from gelnhausen (from hauser- "stillehre . . . des mittelalters"). . double ca])ital, minster at limburg-on-the-lahn (hauser- "stillehre"). . detail of bronze ornament, aachen. . rosette from hciligcnberg near vienna (meyer's "hand- book" etc.) gelnhausen. . german romanesque capital (from an unidentified engrav- ing)- . twelfth century bronze knocker (meyer). !). rosette from cathedral of bale (meyer). . anthemion band from church at hersfeld, saxony. . acanthus molding from munzenberg, hesse ("gewerbe- halle"). . anthemion band from fulda, hesse-cassel (after prang). . romanesque stained glass from heiligenkreuz (hauser, "stillehre"). i t. carved band from liebfrauenkirche. halberstadt (after "klingenberg, mittelalterliehe ornamentik"). . anthemion frieze from south germany (after prang).. . carving from tomb in st. thomas', strassburg. . carved band from anhausen-an-dem-brienz, s. germany ("gewerbehalle"). illustrations not otherwise attributed are from drawings by the author. plate xvso (gewmam etdfmmesqiuietemmemto xvii. gothic structural ornament . buttress pinnacle from notre dame (hauser). . flying arches, sta. barbara, kuttenberg (hauser). . decorative gable, cologne cathedral; middle period tra- cery (hauser). . crocket from st. urbain, troves (hauser). . buttress pinnacle, notre dame, paris (c. u. student draw- ing)- . early french finial. . french gothic vault rib (hauser). . english pier arch moldings (hauser). . late gothic crocket, rouen (hauser). . wall traceries, transept of meaux cathedral (c. u. stu- dent drawing). . finial cathedral of troyes (hauser). vz. half-plan and elevation, clustered pier, notre dame, paris (c. u. student drawing). . pier cap and arch moldings, chartres cathedral (hauser). . early gothic or transitional balustrade (c. u. student drawing). . detail from transept of notre dame, paris (c. u. stu- dent drawing, after lassus and v.-le-duc). . flamboyant balustrade, chateau of josselyn (c. u. stu- dent drawing). . early gothic balustrade, notre dame, paris (c. u. stu- dent drawing). plate xvc gothac orhamemt. steuctomal plate x¥ml gothic ornament. caiwmsaiemqhi. ct st. urtxun. troves xix. gothic ornament, stained glass . border, window in bourges cathedral (prang). . border, jesse window in chartres cathedral (h. w. miller). , . figures from chartres jesse window (h. w. miller). . border, window in bourges cathedral (author, after owen jones). . grisaille, window in bourges cathedral (owen jones). . border, window in bourges cathedral (owen jones). . border, window in york cathedral (owen jones). . border from window in church of st. thomas, strass- burg (author, after owen jones). . window detail from st. denis (prang). plate ml gmmkommahen btamquss border.bourges t thomas church. strassbung t denis-e rfyxb?'c xx. gothic ornament; painted, ceramic and mss. decoration . painted molding, ely cathedral. . painted knriched molding, beverley cathedral. , . painted decorations from brunswick cathedral. . painted decoration from reims cathedral. c. painted decoration, salisbury cathedral. . painted decoration, winchester cathedral. , . tile units from french churches. . painted decoration from church of the jacobins, toulouse. . painted decoration from ranworth church, norfolk. . prom west walton church, norfolk. . french tiling, xhith century. , , , - . ornaments from manuscripts of the xllth and xhith centuries. , . borders from manuscripts of xlvth and xvth centuries. of the above illustrations, nos. to inclusive and , , are from prang's "plates of historic ornament-" by permission, nos. and to inclusive are from owen jones, "grammar of orna- ment." xxi. english gothic ornament . one bay, salisbury cathedral. . one bay, choir of lincoln cathedral. . one bay, lichfield cathedral, nave. . detail from king's college chapel, cambridge. . perpendicular wall tracery. . lancet windows, warmington church. . plate tracery, carlisle cathedral. . geometric tracery, rippington church. . geometric tracery, chapter house, york cathedral. . curvilinear tracery, st. michael's, warfield. . perpendicular tracery, beauchamp chapel, warwick. . curvilinear tracery, oxford cathedral. . transept rose, westminster abbey. . capital from lincoln cathedral: early english. . capital from beverley cathedral: decorated. . cresting ornament, arundel church: perpendicular. . "decorated" finial. . "decorated" crocket. . "decorated" capital, beverley cathedral. . carving from trull church. . one unit of a diaper decoration. . a "perpendicular" doorway and door paneling. nos. , , and are reproduced by permission from the au- thor's drawings in van rensselaer's "english cathedrals" (the century co.). no. is from part of an illustration in simpson's "a history of architectural development" (longmans); is from speltz, by permission; - are by the author; - are from gwilt's "encyclopedia"; , by the author after speltz; - are from drawings by columbia students, from unidentified sources. xxii. italian gothic ornament . detail, portal of cathedral of messina. . open tracery, venetian style. . central doorway, cathedral of messina. -. traceried window, from a town hall. . twisted columns, from niche in facade of church of or san michele, florence. . detail from upper story of campanile, florence. . porch of cathedral of amalfi. . gothic detail in terra-cotta, bologna. . capital, lower arcade of doge's palace, venice. all the above illustrations are from photographs or photographic prints except , which is from a student's drawing. nos. , and are from photo prints published in the magazine stone, reproduced here by permission. index index a aachen, palatine chapel, acanthus: in byzantine o., , ; in french romanesque o., , ; in greek o., , ; in italian gothic, ; in roman o., /egean culture and art, aq. ahuri-mazda, , aizanoi, , alaska, ; totem poles, alby, cathedral, , alexandria, , alexandrian and apulian pottery, altenburg, american indians, "museum of natural his- tory, not* m ornament, primitive, amiens cathedral, , , , , , "triptych in library, angel choir, lincoln cath., , anglo-norman: anthemions, ; arches, corbels, doorways, mold- ings, ; carved ornament, ; fonts and metal work, ; or- nament in general, ; painted decoration, angouleme, animal forms in egyptian o., animism in primitive o., anthemion in anglo-norman o., ; in byzantine o., , ; in french romanesque o., ; in german o., ; in greek o., , , ; greek types of, ; in roman o., antioch, golden church at, applied ornament defined, apollo temple, didyme, ; phig- alaea (basse), apulian pottery, , , , ara coeli (santa maria in), rome, arcatures, , arch: of constantine, ; of ha- drian at athens, ; of titus, , arches: anglo-norman, ; french romanesque, ; gothic, architectural ceramics: greek, ; etruscan, ; pompeiian, architectural motives in greek o., architectural ornament: denned, ; byzantine, ; early christian, ; egyptian, , , ; gothic in general, ; greek, ; pom- peiian, ; roman, ; roman- esque, in general, aries, ; st. trophime at, armenia, , ; ornament of, artemision (temple) at ephesus, asia minor, , , , , , , , , , assist, assyrian: lotus, , ; ornament, origins and methods of, ; sa- cred tree, , , ; stepped parapet, ; volutes, , athens, , , , , aulnay, st. pierre at, auvergne, avallon, avila, b baalbek, babylon, ; gate of ishtar at, index balawat gates, bale cathedral, balustrades, gothic, bamberg, baptistery: florence, ; of s. stefano at bologna, barcelona, barfreston church, bases: gothic, ; greek, , ; roman, ; romanesque, basilican ornament, sq. basilicas, christian: sant' agnese, ; san apollinare at ravenna, , , , ; ara coeli, ; san clemente, , ; st. john lateran, , ; san lorenzo fuori le mura, ; san marco, rome, , ; santa maria mag- giore, , ; santa maria in trastevere, , ; st. paul with- out the walls (san paolo fuori le mura), ; st peter, ; santa prassede, ; santa pudenziana, ; santa sabina, basilicas, pagan: iemilia, ; julia, basse (phigahea), basketry, , , , baths: of caracalla, ; at pompeii, , ; of titus, , battle of issus, mosaic, "beau dieu" of reims, beauvais cathedral, belgium, , benedictines, , , bergen, golden chalice at, biology of styles, bologna, baptistery of s. stefano, books recommended (see end of each chapter). bosnia, jar from, bourg-en-bresse, brou church, , bowtels, english gothic, brazil, central, brou church, , budmer in bosnia, jar from, byzantine details: acanthus, , ; anthemions, , ; bands and borders, ; carving, ; church furniture, ; floors and incrustations, ; guilloches and interlace, ; moldings, ; mosaic, ; mss. illumination, ; rinceau, ; shafts, byzantine influences, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , byzantine ornament, sq.; archi- tectural ; chief characteristics of, ; textile, calabria, campania, , campanile, florence, , canopy windows, , canterbury cathedral, , , capitals: anglo-norman, ; by- zantine, , ; egyptian, ; etruscan, ; gothic, , , ; greek, ; from neandreia, ; persian, , ; pompeiian, ; roman, - , , ; romanesque, , , carolingian art, carrenac, portal of church, carved ornament: anglo-norman, ; byzantine, ; english gothic, ; french gothic, ; french romanesque, ; gothic in general, ; greek, ; ital- ian gothic, ; italian roman- esque, , ; roman, , sq. casa dei capitelli colorati, casa di livia, castor and pollux, temple of, cathedrals: alby, , ; alten- burg, ; amiens, , , , , , , ; bale, ; can- terbury, , , ; chartres, , , , , , , , ; cologne, , , , ; index romanesque, ; gothic in gen- eral, ; roman, fiji islands, fr finials, gothic, flamboyant period, , , , , ; tracery, , , flanders, , flinders petrie, note, , note florence, , , , , ; bap- tistery of, ; campanile, , ; duomo, , , ; or san michele, ; santa maria novella, florid period in gothic o., , , , , "flowing" tracery, , foliage: english gothic, ; french gothic, ; gothic in general, fonts, anglo-norman, france, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , freiburg cathedral, , french gothic ornament: carving, ; figure sculpture, ; foli- age, , moldings, ; painted decoration, ; rose windows, , , , ; stained glass, , ; tracery, french influence in spanish roman- esque o., french romanesque ornament: arches, ; carving of bands and panels, ; classic influence in, , ; corbel tables, ; door- ways, ; figure sculpture, ; general character, ; moldings, ; ornaments, ; painted decoratfcn, fresco, in pompeiian art, fret or meander: egyptian, ; greek, , , friendly islands, frigate bird, furniture: egyptian, ; pompeiian, furniture, ecclesiastical (see church furniture) g gaddi, , gargoyles, gothic, gates: of balawat, ; of ishtar at babylon, ; lion gate at my- cenae, gelathi, armenia, general character of: byzantine o., ; egyptian o., ; french ro- manesque, o., ; greek o., general survey of egyptian o., geometric or dipylon pottery, , geometric motives: in egyptian o., ; in greek o., , geometric tracery, georgian byzantine carving, german: branch tracery, ; gothic moldings, ; gothic* or- nament, general, ; minor arts, ; moldings, ; mss., ; ro- manesque o., ; spires, ; stained glass, , ; tracery, germany, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , gernrode, giotto, , , gloucester cathedral: candlestick, ; cloisters, golden house of nero, , goodyear, w. h., , note, , note, note, note, note gothic: architecture denned, ; architectural periods, ; balus- trades, ; bases, , ; capi- tals, , , ; carving, , ; crestings, ; crockets, , , ; cusping, , ; dec- orative painting, , , ; figure sculpture, , , ^ finials, ; foliage, , ; gargoyles, ; minor architec- ture, ; metal work, ; mold- ings, ; mss. decoration, ; piers, shafts and columns, ; pinnacles, ; stained glass, , index ; the system, ; tracery, , ; wood and metal, italian romanesque: carving, ; cosmati work in, ; general, ; grotesques, ; inlay and striping, ; lombard style, ; mss., ; siculo-arabic style, ; wheel windows, italy, , , , , , , , , ivory carving, byzantine, ivory throne of maximian, j "jachin and boaz," java, war drum head, jean fouquet, jerusalem, , "jesse tree" windows, k kahrie mosque (mone tes choras church), kameiros, rhodes, karnak, hypostyle hall, kelat seman, syria, knossos, crete, , , l label or drip moldings, english, lancet style, leading characteristics of byzan- tine ornament, lichfield cathedral, , liernes, , limoges enamels, , lincoln cathedral: angel choir, , ; circular windows, lion gate, mycenae, living forms in assyrian ornament, loggie of vatican, lombard doorways, lombard style, ; influence of, , lombards, the, lombardy, lotiform motive, greek, lotus: assyrian, , ; egyptian, - , , , , , , , ; trilobe lotus, , , , louviers, church of st. pierre, lucca, ; san guisto at, ; san martino at, lycian architecture, lydia, lysicrates, choragic monument of, , , , m maestri comacini, , maison carree, nimes, mandorla door, florence cathedral, mangaian ornament, manuscript illumination, , , , , martorana, la, at palermo, maximian, ivory throne of, meaning of history of ornament, meaux, cathedral, medallion windows, melos, melian pottery and o., , , metal work, gothic, method of this history, metropolitan museum of art, n. y., vii, , , note mexican pottery, milan cathedral, , miletus, , , minor architecture, gothic, minor arts, german, modillion, the roman, moissac, mokheta, georgia, molaise gospels, molding ornaments, gothic, , moldings: anglo-norman, ; by- zantine, ; drip or label, ; egyptian torus, , ; english gothic, ; french gothic, , index architecture, , , ; rin- ceau, - ; stucco relief, , ; wall decoration, , roman genius, the, romanesque, english (see anglo- norman) romanesque, french (see french romanesque) romanesque, german (see german romanesque) romanesque metal work, romanesque ornament: italian in general, ; lombard, ; tus- can, ; scandinavian, ; span- ish, romanesque period, the, rose windows: english, ; french gothic, , , , rosettes: assyrian, ; cretan, ; egyptian, ; gothic (vaulting bosses), ; greek, ; myce- naean, ; persian, ; roman, , , rosheim, alsace, rouen: cathedral, , ; st. maclou, st. ouen, rouheiha, syria, , russian byzantine ornament, s sacred tree, assyrian, , , sakkarah, tombs at, sainte chapelle, paris, , , , salamanca, salisbury cathedral, salonica, samoan islands, san andrea, vercelli, san apollinare churches at ra- venna, , , , san francesco, assisi, san lorenzo fuori, rome, san marco, rome, , san martino, lucca, san paolo (see st. paul) san miniato, , , san stefano, bologna, san vitale, ravenna, , sant' anastasia, verona, santa costanza, rome, santa maria in ara coeli, rome, "" maggiore, rome, , "" novella, florence, m " pomposa, "" in trastevere, rome, , santa prassede, rome, santa sabina, rome, sardis, savage ornament, characteristics of, , saxony, scaligers, tombs of the, (ill'n); scandinavian ornament, scarabaeus in egyptian ornament, , sicily, , , , siculo-arabic style, , , sidon sarcophagi, , sienna, , , ; cathedral, significance of classifications, six propositions on history of o., solomon's temple, sources and motives of egyptian o., south sea islands, southwark, st. saviour's, southwell chapter house, , spain, , , , , , , spalato in dalmatia, , , , , spanish: chapel of santa maria novella, florence, ; gothic ornament, ; romanesque style, sphinx in egyptian art, spirals: iegean and pre-hellenic, , ; egyptian, ; greek, ; in savage ornament, , index st. ceneri, st. denis, , , st. gilles, near aries, , st john lateran, rome, , st. maclou, rouen, st mark's, venice, , , , , , st omer, cathedral, st. ouen, rouen, st. paul without the walls (san paolo fuori le mura), rome, , st. paul-trois-chateaux, st pierre, louviers, st. saviour's, southwark, st. trophime, aries, st. urbain, troyes, , stained glass, , ; english, ; french, ; german, ste. radegonde, poitiers, stepped parapet: assyrian, ; persian, strassburg, cathedral, , , , structural ornament: defined, ; gothic, stucco relief: pompeiian, ; roman, , styles: "biology" of, ; historic, ;-summary of sequence of, ; value of study of, summary: of characteristics of savage ornament, ; of sequence of styles, sun disk on egyptian buildings, susa, , , swastika: in cypriote ornament, , , ; in egyptian o., ; in greek o., ; in pompeiian mosaics, ; in roman o., syria, , , , syrian christian ornament, system: of italian gothic orna- ment ; roman decorative, t taixnti, architect of campanile, tarragona, technic theory of origins of orna- ment tegernsee, earliest stained glass, note temples: of apollo at didyme, , , , ; of apouo at phi- galaea (basse), ; of castor and pollux, rome, ; of egypt, , ; of erechtheion, athens, , , ; of faustina, rome, ; of parthenon, athens, , , ; of zeus, athens, textile ornament: byzantine, ; gothic, theories of origins of ornament, , tholos: of atreus, mycenae, ; of epidauros, , throne of maximian, tiercerons, , tiles: chaldean and assyrian, , ; romanesque, ; gothic, tiryns, , , , , titus: arch of, , ; baths of, tombs; of abbot of aubazine (ill.), ; at doghanlou, ; of galla placidia, ravenna, ; "of midas," , , ; persian, ; at sakkarah, ; of scaligers, verona, , ; on via latina, toscanella, churches at totemism, totem poles, alaskan, totems, new zealand female, toulouse, capitals in museum of, tourmanin, syria, , tours cathedral, , tracery, gothic window: english, ; french, ; german, ; italian, , ; spanish, trilobe lotus, , , , triptych in amiens library, trocadero museum, paris, , troja, , index troy, , , troyes: cathedral, ; st. urbain at, , tudor rose, tuscan order, tuscan romanesque style, u ulm, minster at, uraeus (adder) in egyptian orna- ment, v vauje of study of styles, variety in roman orders, vatican museum, , vaulting: english gothic, , ; german, ; gothic in general, vaults and ceilings, english, venice, , , , , , ; doge's palace at, ; st. mark's at, , , , , , ; tracery, , vercelli, san andrea at, verona, , , vignola's rules for the orders, vine in byzantine ornament, ; in greek o., viollet-le-duc, ; his restoration of chapels in notre dame, vitruvius, w wall decoration: byzantine, ; pompeiian, ; roman, , wall and gable tracery, wall mosaic at warka, ware, w. r., note warka (erech), wells cathedral, , , , westminster: abbey, ; hall, ; henry vii's chapel, wheel windows: french, ; italian, winchester: cathedral, , ; st. cross at, window tracery (see tracery, gothic window) wood carvings, gothic, wood and metal in italian gothic art, woodwork, english, , y yogdhasil, york cathedral, , , z zamohra, zigzags: anglo-norman, ; egyp- tian, ; french, ; german, ; savage, , zufli pottery, a history of ornament lavaro of santa maria novella, florence, ry giovanni della rorria, . history of ornament renaissance and modern by a. d. f. hamlin, a.m., l.h.d., f.a.i.a. professor of the history of architecture in columria university with jjg illustrations and ts plates new york cooper square publishers, inc. copyright, , by the century co. originally published reprinted by permission of genevieve karr hamlin published by cooper square publishers, inc. fourth avenue, new york, new york international standard book number - - - library of congress catalog card number - printed in the united states of america to the memory of william robert ware founder of architectural education in the united states, my first pre- ceptor in architecture, and fob twenty years my sympathetic and inspiring colleague and chief in columbia university preface six years have passed since the appearance of my first volume, "a history of ornament, ancient and medieval," when i announced my intention of following it with a history of renaissance, modern and oriental ornament, which i hoped to complete in two years. not only have the two years been extended to six on account of the vast amount of material to be studied, digested, selected and put in shape, but it has been clear since early in those operations that the rich and extensive subject of the oriental styles could not possibly be in- cluded in the projected volume without swelling it to quite unwieldy proportions, and putting its cost quite beyond the reach of the average student. him (and her) i have had in mind from the outset; and by "stu- dent" i mean any and every one who seeks to gain real knowledge and not merely to be amused by pictures. the subject-matter of this book differs in a funda- mental way from that of my preceding volume. it deals not with the works of dead and buried civilizations, but with those of a civilization of which our own is the direct heir, or even, as some would have it, a part; and with the works of our own times, that is, of the nine- teenth and twentieth centuries. it covers a period of almost exactly years, whereas the chronology of the previous volume extends from b.c. to a.d., or exactly ten times the length of the period we are now vii preface to study. but because these five centuries are so near to us, and because since the middle ages both the area and the populations included in our survey have so vastly increased, the production of ornament,—that is, of every kind of decorative work other than pure paint- ing and sculpture—has correspondingly increased. moreover, a much greater proportion of this product is still in existence than of the works of antiquity or of the middle ages, while the ornament of the last century and of our own surrounds us on every hand. thus the material that is available for study is enormous, and the books that treat of it are numbered by the thousand. the writer of a history of the modest dimensions of this volume must, therefore, pick and choose, and must ex- clude far more than he can include in its pages and illustrations; and the greatest possible compression must be resorted to, to cover even this restricted field within reasonable limits. i therefore make no apology for the manifest omis- sions of this work. my readers may differ with me as to the excellence of the judgment shown in choosing what to keep and what to leave out, and no one's choice can possibly please all. but on the question of the amount to be omitted or included i was under inexorable necessity. what this book seeks to do is not to present a com- pendium of all the arts and forms of ornament produced since , but rather to sketch the general historic movement of the arts of decoration; the genesis, evolu- tion and succession of the various styles that have pre- vailed; and to analyze, describe and illustrate them in viii preface such fashion that the reader may be led to an intelligent understanding of their character and some mastery of their dominant characteristics. and whereas in the previous volume but little space could be devoted to the allied and minor arts, because the remains in these arts from antiquity and even from the middle ages are rela- tively so scanty compared with the architecture, in the present volume a much larger proportion of space is allowed to them, although architecture is still treated as the mistress of all the decorative arts. another important consideration deserves notice. the arts of antiquity and of the middle ages belong to times so remote, and to cultures so different from our own, that recourse to them in modern design partakes somewhat of the nature of archeeology. the arts of the renaissance, on the other hand, sprang from a civiliza- tion which we have inherited, and from which we are separated in time rather than in character, culture, and sympathy. we fall naturally into ways of thinking and ways of designing taught us by the whole movement of the renaissance. the ornament of that age, therefore, is full of suggestion, inspiration, and examples for our use. it is of far more practical availability for us than that of remoter ages. a word is in order regarding the illustrations. the selection of subjects is far different from what it would have been if material had been available in all cases in a form suitable for reproduction, and if there had been no limitations of either time, space, or expense to restrict their selection and preparation. about of those finally selected are line-cuts printed with the text, for iz preface convenience of immediate reference. over others are half-tones, printed on separate folios of plate paper and bound in with the text. the confusion and lack of sequence in the numbering which this introduced in the previous volume have been avoided in the present volume by numbering the half-tones independently of the line- cuts, and referring to them by the word "figure" fol- lowed by bold-faced numerals, while the text-cuts are referred to by the abbreviation "fig." followed by numerals in ordinary type. at the end of the volume, as in the previous work, are a series of full-page plates, of which five are in color. i have given credit wherever possible to the authors or publishers of illustrations not drawn by my own hand, and have generally indicated the sources of drawings made by myself otherwise than from my own original sketches. many of these draw- ings, however, were made so long ago that in many cases i have lost the memoranda of their sources, and am therefore unable to give the desired credit. i desire to make grateful acknowledgment of the assistance given me during these six years by many persons: to those of my students who have permitted me to use their drawings; to the officers of the avery library of columbia university for many courtesies; to miss starrett, of the avery library, for valuable as- sistance in the typing of several chapters of my manu- script; to mr. talbot f. hamlin for several drawings and for valuable criticisms; to charles scribner's sons, to the american architect co., to the publishers of "good furniture," to messrs. byne and stapley and the hispanic society, to messrs. hessling, now of x preface montreal; and to b. t. batsford and messrs. chapman and hall of london, for permission to copy or repro- duce illustrations in works published by them; to the metropolitan museum of art and the hispanic society for permission to draw or reproduce illustrations of ob- jects in their collections; and to the century co. for the promptness, efficiency and sympathy of their coopera- tion in the publishing of this work. if i have inadver- tently omitted from this list the name of any who have helped me or to whom credit should be given, i must ask their pardon and will, if informed of the omission, remedy it in any future reprintings of the book. since the foregoing paragraphs were sent to the printer, the valuable and kindly aid given me by several of my students in the final preparation or completion of a number of drawings inadvertently or unavoidably left to the last, has placed me under a special obligation of grateful recognition. i trust i have omitted none of the names of these helpful volunteers in the follow- ing list: messrs. l. albright, c. f. deam, r. gottlieb, s. r. moore, v. rambusch; misses a. m. chapman, m. brandt and m. c. hills. it should be added that illustrations credited to "student's work" or "student's drawing" are taken from drawings made in the regular course of required work in the school of architecture of columbia uni- versity, and that in the case of those which have no name appended, the author's name has been lost. the source from which the student derived his illustration i have not attempted to trace. a. d. f. hamlin. xi contents chaptel fact i the renaissance in general ii the early renaissance in italy .... iii the early renaissance in italy, ii—archi- tecture and accessory arts iv the middle renaissance v italian baroque ornament vi the renaissance in france, i vii the renaissance in france, ii viii renaissance ornament in spain .... ix renaissance ornament in the netherlands . x renaissance ornament in germany . . . xi renaissance ornament in great britain . . xii renaissance and colonial ornament in amer- ica xiii the modern revivals and nineteenth cen- tury xiv the nineteenth century in america . . . xv the twentieth century: europe and amer- ica list of plates index list of illustrations (figs.) explanation of references those whose source is not otherwise indicated are from original drawings by the author. the word "after" followed by a name indicates a drawing by the author derived from or based upon the source named. eaton: handbook of modern french sculpture. ewerbeck: die renaissance in beu "amer. architect": american archi- tect and architectural review formerly "american architect and building news" (fortnightly, n. *.). "arch'l record": the architectural record (monthly, n. y.). "arte della stampa": a book on printing published by ongania, venice. bankart: the art of the plasterer. blomneld: a hiitory of renais- sance architecture in england. bode: italian furniture. "bulletin metrop. mus.": monthly, issued by the metropolitan mu- seum, new york. byne and stapley: spanish archi- tecture of the sixteenth century (and other books on the spanish renaissance: see bibliographies). cervetto: / gaggini da bissone. champeaux: le meuble. daly: motifs historiques d'architec- ture et de sculpture. deck: la faience. de vinne: notable printers of italy during the xv century. de vries: plusieurs menuiseries. durm: baukunst der renaissance in it alien. gien und holland. f. s. m. (franz sales meyer): handbook of ornament. garner and stratton: domestic architecture of the tudor period. gewerbehalle: die oewerbehalle (a german art monthly long extinct). geyrouller: die architektur der re- naissance in toscama. glazier: manual of historic orna- ment. good furniture: good furniture (monthly trade magazine). gotch (gotch and brown): early renaissance architecture in eng- land. griggs: italian and sicilian orna- ment. guerinet: decorations d'architecture et de sculpture (miscellaneous photo-prints). gurlitt: oeschichte des barockstiles in it alien. hispanic museum: the museum of the hispanic society, new york. jewitt: ceramic art in great brit- xv list of illustrations kelekian: catalogue of the kelekian collection (textiles). letarouilly: edificet de rome mod- erne; also, le vatican et la basi- lique de st. pierre. odds and ends: a series of illustra- tions formerly published by the american architect. odom: a history of italian furni- ture. ortwein (a. ortwein and others): deuttche renaissance. owen jones: grammar of ornament. prentice: renaissance architecture and ornament in spain. r. and d. (rouyer et darcel): l'art architectural en france. raguenet: matiriaux et documents d'architecture. reymond (marcel reymond'): le* delia robbia. rlcci: baroque architecture and sculpture in italy. rouyer: la renaissance de fran- cois ler a louie xiii. saglio: history of french furniture. schubert: oeschichte des barock in spanien. sherrill: a stained glass tour in italy. vacher: fifteenth century italian ornament. vogt: la porcelaine. ward: historic ornament, vol. ii. ware (w. rotch ware): the georgian period. wiebeking: analyse architecturale de 'europe (a miscellaneous col- lection of engravings of architec- ture). workshop: the workshop (a ger- man american periodical of in- dustrial art published in new york - ). figs. *aob . painted details from san francesco, assist is . bronze candelabrum, strozzi chapel, san andrea della valle, rome (after an old engraving) . florentine or venetian "marriage coffer" in south kensington museum (glazier) . rinceau from tomb in sta. maria del popolo, rome .... . flat relief ornament, marsuppini tomb in sta. croce, flor- ence (f. s. m.) . pilaster-scroll, town hall of verona ("workshop") .... . festoon of olives, sta. maria della pace, rome (after f. s. m.) . two renaissance rosettes (one after f. s. m.) . pilaster detail, san giobbe, venice (after photo) .... . griffin from tomb in san domenico, maggiore, naples (after photo) . entablature, porch chapel of pal. pubblico, sienna .... . mascaron, pal. fossombroni, arezzo (after geymuller) ... . scroll, pazzi chapel (after photo) xvi list of illustrations pigs. page . fruit border by luca delia robbia, from medallion in pal. quaratesi, florence (after photo in reymond) . rinceau from mandorla door, cathedral, florence (after photo) . "putti" and festoon, tomb of ilaria del carretto, lucca (after photo) . two candelabrum-shafts . pilaster arabesques by b. da majano and p. lombardi (after f. s. m.) . pilaster detail from venice (after photo) . top of doorway to library, sienna cathedral (from an italian periodical) . two "cantilever" brackets . capital from courtyard, gondi palace, florence (after photo) so . (a) pilaster cap, naples; (b) corbel, fiesole (after geymuller) . four capitals from sienna, cortona, gubbio, bologna (after f. s. m., geymuller, and photos) . (a) pilaster cap, venice (after f. s. m.); (b) pier cap, bo- logna (after photo) . column in san zaccaria, venice . three types of pilaster treatment . pilaster, venice ("workshop") . column from spello (after geymuller) . four entablatures, from riccardi, strozzi and gondi palaces, florence, and palazzo pretorio, lucca (student's work) . . . entablature of shrine, madonna del sasso, bibbiena .... . typical florentine arch-pediment s . standard of holy water font, badia fiesolana . spandrel from a chapel in genoa cathedral (after cervetto) . s . acanthus decorations, venice and bologna (after photos) . . acanthus from sarcophagus of marsuppini, sta. croce, flor- ence (after photo) . acanthus from tomb of piero di medici, san lorenzo, flor- ence (after photo) . acanthus from torch-bracket, sienna - . nine varieties of acanthus . arabesque panel, "giant's stairs," doge's palace, venice . . . flat relief ornament from a tomb dated . two arabesques: (a) san francesco di rimini; (b) badia fiesolana (after photos) . panel, altar in orvieto cathedral (after cast in ecole des beaux- arts, paris) . arabesque, villa salviati, florence (after geymuller) ... . arabesques from venice and urbino xvii list of illustrations figs. hoe . anthemions: (a) tomb of count ugo, badia, florence (after f. s. m.); (b) sgraffito decoration, florence (after geymul- ler) . detail of frieze over door, ducal palace, urbino (after photo) . anthemion from a cast in florence (after f. s. m.) .... . detail, chimneypieee in doge's palace, venice . typical lyre motives from piers in court of pal. vecchio, florence (after photo) . detail from tomb of cassandra misata, naples . detail from fossombroni palace, arezzo (after geymuller) . festoon, base of pilaster in sta. maria dei miracoli, venice . . fruit, from albertoni monument, sta. maria del popolo, rome (after photo) . "putti" and wreath, doorway of pazzi chapel, sta. croce, florence (after photo) . (a) "putti" and shield, archbishop's palace, florence; (b) de- tail from tomb at folleville, france, by ant. tamagno (traced from cervetto) . mascaron and arabesque from a column of tomb in san do- men ico maggiore, naples (after photo) . grotesques from library of san lorenzo, florence, attributed to michelangelo (after f. s. m.) . grotesque, pal. del magnifico, sienna (after f. s. m.) ... . flat relief ornament, sta. maria dei miracoli, venice ... . ceiling detail, church at bironico (from a book advertisement) . (a) ceiling of pazzi chapel, florence ("workshop"); (b) ceil- ing of sta. maria dei miracoli, venice (student's drawing) . ceiling, cortona cathedral . ceiling, santo spirito in sassia, rome . frame of doorway, pal. doria, genoa (after photo) .... . florentine door panels (wiebeking) . arched window, urbino . niche and statue, tomb in fiaschi chapel, genoa cathedral (after cervetto) . seven types of baluster . balustrade, la scala hospital, sienna (student's drawing) . . acanthus corbel, stalls in pal. del comune, pistoia (after photo) . shrine, hospital of san francesco, gubbio . holy water font, pisa cathedral (after photo) . holy water font by ant. federighi, sienna cathedral (after photo) . detail of inlaid floor, sienna cathedral (after photo) ... xviii list of illustrations pigs. pag« . detail of intarsia by b. da majano in pal. vecchio, florence (f. s. m.) . detail of intarsia on harpsichord in bardini collection . . . . oriental motives from ceramics and textiles, and three details from italian textiles . two textile motives framed in a mesh . painted textile pattern in picture by crivelli (after s. vacher) s . four textile motives: (a) florentine, xvth century; (b) blue and white wool on linen; (c) pattern from painting by guido da sienna; (d) venetian velvet: (after s. vacher and kelekian) . north italian needlework (after fischbach) . three lace patterns (racinet) . venetian punta-in-aria (after "bulletin metrop. mus.") . . . two fifteenth century initials ("arte della stampa") ... . typographic ornament, venice, (after de vinne) ... . four orders of architecture . ionic order, pal. pietro massimi, rome (after letarouilly) . . columnar arcades: (a) pal. pompei, verona; (b) basilica, vi- cenza (student's drawings) .' . window, pandolfini palace, florence . typical "thumb-moldings" from furniture . painted rinceau, loggie of the vatican (after letarouilly) . stucco relief, loggie of the vatican (after photo) .... . stucco relief, villa madama (after photo) . examples of florentine sgraffito decoration (after geymuller) . two ceilings from farnese palace (w. h. schanck, after letarouilly) . half-plan of a church ceiling in venice . "curl-over" detail, ceiling of sala del senato, doge's palace, venice (after photo) . stucco relief, facade of spada palace, rome (after photo) . . lower half of door in vatican palace ("workshop") ... . doorway and door, pal. pietro massimi, rome . italian renaissance bed-post (after odom) . italian renaissance foot-board (after odom) . florentine mirror-frame (after photo in bode) . three gaines: (a) from a florentine cabinet; (b) from villa papa guilio, rome; (c) canephora, caprarola gardens (after photo) . florentine sgabellone (after bode) . escutcheon with montefeltro arms (after ricci) . iron light-bracket, citta di castello (after f. s. m.) . . . zix list of illustrations fios. riau . plate with portrait from vienna museum ("workshop") . . . border pattern from plate, florence or urbino . majolica border detail (after f. s. m.) . urbino plate in germanic museum, vienna ("workshop") . . . two details, top and border of tapestry by raphael in vatican chasuble, th century, sturgis collection (after photo) . . . an italian renaissance window (after sherrill) . top of gateway, villa falconieri, frascati (after gurlitt) . . twisted column, confessional in san andrea, vercelli (after ricci) . voluted buttress, cathedral of syracuse, (after ricci) . voluted buttresses, sta. maria della salute, venice .... . gateway of seminary at milan (after durm) . pilaster detail, caprarola . "vermiculated" and "congelated" rustications . escutcheon and tympanum, san girolamo, rome, by dom. castelu (after ricci) arms of urban viii, (after ricci) three escutcheons from verona . half-wreath and palms, san giovanni laterano, by galilei (after ricci) . gaine or sheath-figure, sacristy of certosa, pavra (after ricci) . gaine from a gateway of villa alabani, rome (after f. s. m.) . one-quarter of a stucco ceiling, pal. mattei, rome (o. j.) . . baluster, cernetto palace, bitonto (after ricci) . wall decorated in classic revival or louis xvi style (old engraving reproduced in "good furniture") . italian brocatelle, th century (after griggs) . traditional motive, blue wool on cotton . wall hanging, applique and needlework (after kelekian) . . s . venetian lace, th century, in metropolitan museum, new york (after "good furniture") . venetian th century bronze knocker (after photo) ... . half of a th century plate ("workshop") . corbel from verneuil (raguenet) . end elevation, tomb of children of charles viii, tours (student's drawing) . end elevation, tomb of francis ii, duke of brittany, nantes (o. j.) . one bay of court facade, north wing of blois (w. t. par- tridge) . pilaster and entablature, chambord (after r. & d.) . . . . . upper part of a francis i doorway, toulouse (after daly) . xx list of illustrations figs. noi . upper part of a francis i dormer . typical francis i s-scroll . candelabrum-shaft from toulouse (after daly) s . carved rinceau, chateau de pagny (after photo) . stucco enrichments, gallery of francis i, fontainebleau (after daly) . panel from wainscot, gallery of francis i, montainebleau (after photo) . a francis i chair (after "good furniture") . doorway at clermont-ferrand (after r. & d.) . chimney-top, chateau d'anet (after r. & d.) . wainscot and bahut, chateau de cheverny (after r. & d.) . . table, style of charles ix-henry ii (after rouyer) ... . panel of cupboard by sambin (after saglio) . shrine for heart of francis i (after photo in eaton, "french sculpture") . panel from a door, cluny museum, paris . panel from so-called chamber of henry iv, louvre, paris . henry ii bronze door-pull ("odds and ends," american architect) a. door-knocker from narbonne (after photo) . enameled plate by penicaud (speltz) . colossal order of hotel lamoignon, paris . brick and stone architecture, detail (after daly) . . . . . bull's eye window, house in toulouse (after daly) ... . typographic ornament by theo. de bry (o. j.) a. louis xiii painted nielle, chateau of cheverny . facade, church of st. paul-st. louis, paris ("american archi- tect") . three louis xiii over-doors (after daly) . louis xiii cradle (after f. s. m.) . louis xiii cabinet (speltz after "l'art pour tous") ... . decorative treatment, galerie d'apollon, louvre (after r. & d.) . molding, galerie d'apollon, louvre (after r. & d.) . . . . . ceiling-cove, versailles (after daly) . door-panel, church of st. louis-en-l'isle, paris (after photo in guerinet) . arch impost, hotel de lauzun, paris (after daly) .... . ornament by lepautre (o. j.) . cabinet by boulle (ward) . louis xiv "fauteuil" or easy-chair (champeaux) .... . louis xiv table (champeaux) * xxi list of illustrations figs. pioi . iron balcony railing (after daly) . gate, choir of st. ouen, rouen (after r. & d.) . vase, menard le chateau (after photo in guerinet) .... . point d'alencon lace (ward) . (a) french lace, xvii century (after "good furniture"); (b) needlework, velvet bed-lambrequin . detail from a th century brocade or velvet (after waring) . keystone decoration, versailles (after daly) . corner of panel in hdtel soubise, paris (after daly) ... . louis xv shells on a bracket . ceiling cove, versailles (after photo in guerinet) .... . commode by caffieri (ward) . balustrade by heret, nancy (after raguenet) . rustication and paneling, arch at chalons-sur-marne (after photo) . louis xvi window-head, house in rue du temple, paris (after daly) . two console brackets, louis xvi (after daly) . louis xvi picture frame (from an advertisement) .... . louis xvi commode (champeaux) . louis xvi chair, mobilier national (champeaux) .... . louis xvi candlestick . louis xvi iron gate (spelu) . early french faience (a), (c), oiron ware; (b) palissy ware (deck and speltz) . top of doorway, san clemente, toledo (after photo) ... . tomb in capilla real, granada (byne and stapley) .... . casa monterey, salamanca (after photo) . heraldic escutcheon, escueslas menores, salamanca (after photo in byne & stapley) . candelabrum-shaft, casa de zaporta, saragossa . capital, alcala de henares in madrid museum (after photo in byne & stapley) . bracket capital, guadalajara . part of facade of convent of san marcos, leon (after pren- tice) . decorative rustication, alcala (after byne & stapley) ... . artesonado ceiling, university, salamanca . cornice of lonja, saragossa (after byne & stapley) ... . detail, retablo in poblet monastery (pedlar after prentice) . . detail from reja, segovia cathedral (student drawing after byne & stapley) xxii list of illustrations pi . . detail from provincial hospital, seville (after photo in byne & stapley) * . upper part, facade of san jorge, la coruna (after schubert) . portal of san andrea, valencia (after photo) . a spanish th century table (after photo in hispanic museum) . detail of church book-rest (after photo in hispanic museum) . details of "chip-carving" on spanish furniture . arabic and moorish "lily" motives; (a) (b) from cairo; (c) from alhambra . patterned tiles (l'albright after a french color-print) ... . single motive or one-color tiles . iron window grille (after byne and stapley) . embroidered wall-hanging, red on white, toledo town hall (after byjie & stapley) . detail from municipal standard of la guardia in hispanic museum; gold and silver on red velvet . red velvet stole in hispanic museum; gold and silver appli- qu£ and embroidery . altar rail from church at leau, belgium (after ewerbeck) . . wooden panel, audenarde (after ewerbeck) . . flemish chest and credence (f. s. m.) . flemish table (f. s. m.) . nielle ornament from furniture (after ewerbeck) .... . brussels point lace, th century (ward) . gable ornament, leyden (after ewerbeck) . dormer, leyden (after ewerbeck) . carved "jewels" arched doorway, leyden (after ewerbeck) . . bed-post gaine by paul v. de vries (after de vries) ... . doorway decoration by paul v. de vries (after de vries) . .. . typographic ornaments by elzevir, (elzevir) .... . delft tiles, xvii century (speltz) . delft faience, plate and ewer (deck) . part of facade, otto heinrichsbau, heidelberg (ortwein) . . . columns from portals of rathaus, miinden. and castle of aschaffenburg (ortwein) . carving on lower half of column, bevern (ortwein) . . . . gable, state pharmacy, saalfield (ortwein) . dormer, hamelschenburg castle (ortwein) . window, house at dinkelsbtihl ("workshop") . "strapwork" or "applique" ornament, marienkirche, rostock (ortwein) . carving, stalls of chapel in mayence cathedral (ortwein) . . xxiii list of illustrations figs. faoh . carving, portal of gymnasium (school) at coblenz (ortwein) . carvings from nuremburg, ; leadwork, th century ("workshop") . tower-toppings (l. albright, after photos) . german gaines: from a mantel in lubeck; heidelberg castle; monument at pforzheim; national museum, munich (f. s. m.) . lower part of an etched bowl, th century ("workshop") . . (a) etched tin plate, th century; (b) iron chest, xvi century ("workshop") . carved ivory dagger sheath . late th century silver goblet ("workshop") . two fanlights; from nuremburg town hall and salt house at frankfort (ortwein) . grille from eperecs, hungary (ortwein) ....... . door-lock, bamberg museum (ortwein) . earthenware stove, mondsee, austria (ortwein) . earthenware jug ("workshop") . tyrolese platter, germanic museum, vienna ("workshop") . . sideboard and cabinet, late th century, vienna ("work- shop") . th century chair, dresden museum (after f. s. m.) . . . . german text initials, th century (speltz and f. s. m.) . . . initial by killian of augsburg (speltz) . typographic ornaments (f. s. m.) . terra cotta relief, head of coesar, hampton court (v. ram- busch) (facsimile after r. blomfield) . doric chimney tops, lacock priory (rambusch, facsimile after gotch) . doorway, hatfield house (s. morgan, student drawing) . . . ceiling pattern, great yarmouth (garner and stratton) . . . ceiling pattern, llanfihangel, wales (garner and stratton) . . pendant, ceiling in crewe hall (s. morgan, student's drawing) . elizabethan and jacobean details (b. irby, student's drawing) . "folden linen" or linenfold panel, elizabethan . entrance bay, bramshill house (author's ill'n in century dic- tionary) . jacobean gables (a. f. deam) . detail, chimneypiece in aston hall (student's drawing) . . . entrance, morden college, blackheath, (london "archi- tect") . carved door-head, clifford's tnn (glazier) . carved panel from st. mary's, by wren (glazier) .... zxiv list of illustrations fios. faob . steeple of bow church (st. mary-le-bow) london by wren . . ceiling plan of st. mary's woolnoth (bankart) . one bay of dome decoration, radcliffe library, oxford, by gibbs (bankart) . architectural details, adam style (speltz) '. . . two adam ceilings (speltz) . detail, iron gate at hampton court (s. r. moore) .... . silver fire-dog, knole park (ward) . silver wine urn, (ward) . detail, elizabethan oak chest (after "spring gardens sk. bk.*') . chimneypiece, worcestershire (after "spring gardens sk. bk.") . the "great bedstead" of cromwell (speltz) . a chippendale chair ("good furniture") . a hepplewhite chair ("good furniture") ....... . a sheraton chair (m. brandt) . staircase detail, house in chichester ("arch'i. record") . . a toft platter (after jewitt) . a bow vase (ward) . a wedgwood tea-pot (vogt) . crown derby cup and saucer (ward) . church facade, chihuahua, mexico ("the continent," ) . . confessional, cathedral of mexico, mexico city ("american architect") . detail, overhang of house, farmington, conn. (demolished ) . door of house in newport, r. i. (student's drawing) ... . scroll-pediment, window of hancock house, boston (demol- ished; after photo) . central bay, vassal-craigie or longfellow house, cambridge, mass. (saxe, after photo) . decorative urns and gate-post, salem, mass. (ware) ... . two colonial spires; christ church, philadelphia, and st paul's, new york . gate to cowles mansion, farmington, conn. (m. c. hills, after sketch by author) . chimneypiece, phillipse manor, yonkers, n. y. (ware) ... . upper part of doorway, gunston hall, va. (ware) .... . detail of declaration chamber, independence hall, philadelphia (ware) . detail, ionic order, doorway of cary house, batavia, n. y. (ware) . detail, interior cornice of homewood, baltimore (mixsell) . . detail of stairway, lee house, marblehead, mass xxv list of illustrations rioa. not . details, morris-jumel mansion, new york (methven after don- ald millar) . upper part of door, mappa house, trenton, n. j. (ware) . . carved details of chair-back, william and mary style (adver- tisement in "good furniture") . empire pilaster, chair, sphinx and footstool (f. j. woodbridge, student's drawing) . empire ornaments: (a) from bed in grand trianon, versailles; (b) from a table (t. f. hamlin) . cornice and frieze, pal. de justice, paris (f. j. woodbridge) . details, pal. de justice, paris with (a) inset of pilaster cap.; (b) console, west front (p. barnum and raguenet) . . . detail, stair balustrade in pal. de justice, paris . detail, tomb in pere-la-chaise, paris . details from houses in paris (raguenet) . an "eastlake" sideboard ("workshop") . details of paris street architecture, th century (raguenet) . detail, city bank, ladyhill, by collcutt, ("academy archi- tecture") . a scotch town hall by r. sandilands (architect's drawing) . a french floral wall-paper ("gewerbehalle," ) .... .' . a german floral plate-border ("gewerbehalle") . detail from a german cabinet in berlin, ("workshop") . . german communion wine flagon, ("gewerbehalle") . . . details from old court house, , n. y., by frazee (archi- tect's drawing) . carved detail, albany state capitol library, by richardson . . carved detail, harvard university law school, by richard- son (t. f. hamlin after "monographs of amer. architec- ture") . lady's jewelled comb by lalique (after "good furniture") . . window by v. horta, brussels (m. c. hills, after photo) . . . detail f hotel, champs elysees, paris ("arch'l record") . . . balcony railing, louis xvi style ("workshop") .... . lower part of schiller building, chicago, by sullivan ("amer. architect") . upper part of schiller building, chicago ("arch'l record") . . part of facade, roman catholic church, fall river, mass., by r. a. cram ("brickbuilder") . two typographical ornaments (advertisements in "good fur- niture") . typographical borders (advertisements in "good furniture") . . decorative initial ("the craftsman," ) xxvi list of illustrations fios. % nsi . commercial furniture advertisement ("good furniture") . . . american drapery, "canterbury" pattern (after advertisement in "good furniture") . detail from an american ingrain rug . curtain of machine net (after advertisement in "good furni- ture") . outside stair railing, chicago ("odds and ends," "amer. architect") . "peasant" ornament: chest from bethlehem, pa. (t. f. hamlin) . "peasant" ornament: standard from polish spinning wheel . peasant ornament: polish wall-tile, navaho blanket, polish stained egg (t. f. hamlin) xxvii list of half-tone illustrations (figures) all half-tone illustrations not otherwise credited are from photographs in library of school of architecture, columbia university, or in author's collection. the following arc taken by permission from the good furniture magazine (dean-hicks company, grand rapids, michigan): figures , , , , - , , , . figure is from a measured drawing by r. h. smythe. figure is reproduced from a bulletin of the metropolitan museum of art, new york; from an italian periodical, mowwmenti storici. figures to inclusive are taken from french post-cards, except e, g, and h, which are from gu£rinet. figure is taken from illustrations in ward, historic ornament, and deck, la faience. figure is from byne and stapley, architecture of the sixteenth century in spain. figures - arc reproduced from k. o. fritsch, denkmaeler der deutschen renaissance; and from ortwein's renaissance und barock- stil; from a book advertisement. figures and are from bankart, the art of the plasterer; and from ware, the georgian period; and from the brochure series (bates & guild co., boston); from a. e. richardson, monumental classical architecture in great britain; and from odds and ends, published by the american architect. lavabo of santa maria novella, florence, by giovanni della robbia, frontispiece rigs. paol . the baptistery, florence . east doors of baptistery, by ghiberti . tomb of ilaria del caretto, lucca cathedral . cantoria by luca della robbia . central part, facade of certosa near pavia . porch of santa maria dei miracoli, brescia . tomb of bishop federigo benozzi, by luca della robbia . . . . pulpit in santa croce, florence . lunette by luca della robbia (reymond) . altarpiece by andrea della robbia . tomb of piero di medici in old sacristry, san lorenzo, flor- ence "stone" xxiz list of half-tone illustrations pios. rial . festoon or "swag," sistine chapel, rome . detail from pulpit in santa croce, florence iv font in baptistery of san giovanni, sienna (r. h. smythe) . . facade of pazzi chapel, florence . ceiling, sacristy of san spirito, florence . window from casa caracci, bologna . ceiling of sala del consiglio, palazzo vecchio, florence ... . ceiling, sala regia, vatican, rome . ceiling, library of cathedral, sienna . ceiling, sala del cambio, perugia . tomb of lionardo bruni in santa croce, florence .... . tomb of ascanio sforza in santa maria del popolo, rome . . door, san andrea, mantua . door, san michele, venice . detail, facade of palazzo rucellai, florence . detail, facade of palazzo vendramini, venice . ceiling, palace at caprarola . stucco detail, villa madama, rome . stucco detail, court of palazzo vecchio, florence . fountain in grotto, villa reale di castello, florence (attributed to donatello) . fountain at messina by montorsoli (destroyed in earthquake of ) . stalls in palazzo pubblico, sienna .... . detail, stalls of san pietro casinense, perugia . panel, stalls in san severino, naples . italian renaissance table . (a) half of th-century credence (b) half of mirror, and th-century table . fanlight grille, north italian (barbantine monastery) . . . . pedestal and statue by b. cellini, florence . italian renaissance armor, metropolitan museum, new york . . balcony railing, ticino . portia pia, rome, by michelangelo . baldacchino, st. peter's, rome, by l. bernini . ceiling, sala di giove, pitti palace, florence . door, palazzo negrone, genoa . stucco details, palazzo negrone, genoa . tomb of cardinals of amboise, rouen . tomb of louis xii, st. denis . (a) door, cathedral of aix (b) detail from house of francis i, paris xxx list of half-tone illustrations figs. fasi (c) fireplace, salon d'honneur, blois (d) pilaster from tomb of cardinals of amboise, rouen . . . (e) wooden molding (f) stair-tower, north wing of blois (g) francis i s-scrou (h) carved panel from ehfiteau of bonnivet . dormer, chateau of blois (modern restoration) . pendant from jube of cathedral of limoges . grotesques from choir-inclosures, cathedral of chartres . . . . panel from tomb of philippe de commines, louvre .... . henry ii wainscot and fireplace, blois . chapel screen, cathedral of rodez . doorway and door, hdtel de vogue, dijon . frame, style of henry iv . panel, style of henry iv . entrance-gate, luxemburg palace, paris . (a) chateau de balleroi (b) henry iv panels (c,d) henry ii metalwork . louis xiv chest of drawers . detail, chambre du conseil, versailles . detail, front of chapel of st. louis, rouen . . . ... . . . money-cabinet by schlodti and goudreaux ( ) .... . fountain of "grosse horloge," rouen . detail, "cabinet de travail de louis xvi," versailles ... . illustrations of french ceramics . entrance to university of salamanca . entrance to archbishop's palace, seville . silleria, choir of cathedral of jaen . ceiling, ayuntamiento viejo, granada «. upper part of reja, choir of seville cathedral . detail of window-grille, casa de pilatos, seville . gate to university library, salamanca . hotel-de-ville, ghent . town hall, hoorn . dutch chest-table, embroidered cover . dutch or flemish walnut cabinet, inlaid . flemish oak cabinet, th century . painted dutch wardrobe bureau, th or th century ... . door in "golden room" of schloss buckeburg . doorway of castle (fiirstenhof) at wismar . ceiling detail, schloss heiligenberg ( ) . entrance-pavilion of zwinger palace, dresden xxxi list of half-tone illustrations figs. pafll . headpiece of horse-armor, vienna museum . iron gate, university of breslau . silver book-cover, th century . oval window-grille, st. nicholas, breslau . plaster ceiling, new river offices, london, - ... . carvings by grinling gibbons: (a) st. james, piccadilly. . . (b) hampton court .... . facade of la merced church, lima, peru . facade of el posito church, guadalupe, mexico . parlor door, shirley, virginia . detail of doorway, annapolis, maryland . mantelpiece, ladd house, portsmouth, new hampshire . . . . detail, fireplace, brockiss house, germantown, pennsylvania . . (a) part of paneled chest of drawers, dutch influence, - (b) american chippendale mirror, - (c) american mirror of - , adam or louis xvi deri- vation s (d) american sconce, , louis xvi style . (a) half of an empire credence; (b) empire table ... . door of st. george's hall, liverpool . details, academy, athens . midland hotel, london . albert memorial, london . opera-house, paris, grand stairway . regnault monument in ecole des beaux-arts, paris .... . american th-century furniture: sideboard by d. phyfe, clocks, piano . greek revival doorway, south fifth ave., new york . . . . gothic business building, boston (cir. ) . four capitals by p. b. wight for academy of design, new york (demolished) . part of public library, woburn, massachusetts, by richardson . carved newel of grand stairs, state capitol, albany, new york hi. eight examples of american metalwork th and th centuries . peasant ornament: (?) norwegian weave; (b, c, d) pennsyl- vania pottery; (e, f) russian tables xxxii a history of ornament renaissance and modern a history of ornament renaissance and modern introduction a history of renaissance and modern ornament is a record of the origin, development, culmination, decline and succession of the styles and movements which have dominated decorative design since the close of the mid- dle ages. such a record, if all-embracing and ex- haustive, would require many volumes and might, in- deed, fill a considerable library. in the fifteen chapters which follow, a more modest task has been undertaken, by limiting both the field to be covered and the scope of its treatment. in the first place it has seemed wise to exclude from this survey the whole field of oriental ornament, as a subject so vast, and on the whole so distinct from that of the art of europe and america, as to require separate treatment in another volume (see preface, p. vii). secondly, as this is a history of orna- ment, rather than of decorative art in its broadest sense, the field of decorative sculpture and painting— that is, of such painting and sculpture as exist for their own sakes as pictorial and sculptural representations per se—has also been excluded. the distinction between such sculpture and painting on the one hand and sculp- a history of ornament ture and painting incidental and subordinate to schemes of ornament on the other, is explained in chapter i, pp. , of the first volume of this series, "the history of ornament, ancient and medieval." the purpose of the present volume, as of its predecessor, is to meet the needs of those students and workers in the decorative arts who wish to understand something of the origin, history, and characteristics of the various styles of orna- ment with which they have to deal in their work and studies, without being compelled to search through innumerable volumes in various languages in the public libraries; volumes treating each of some particular and limited phase of the arts they wish to study. the student, therefore, will not find in this book a com- pendium, atlas or encyclopedia of all the ornament of europe and america produced in the last five hundred years; but rather a survey, necessarily concise and in many respects superficial, of the genesis, progress, and relations of the various styles of ornament comprised within the chosen field, with only such illustrations as may serve to explain and illuminate the text. the treatment adopted here, as in the first volume, is historical rather than analytical or topical. that is to say, instead of taking up successively each of the decora- tive arts—architecture, woodwork, textiles, ceramics, metalwork, glass, jewelry, etc.—and tracing its history from the middle ages to the present time, the purpose is to follow the general historical movement of the deco- rative arts as a whole, with such notice of particular developments in the various arts as may help the reader to understand the movement as a whole, or as are inci- introduction dental to the general discussion of a style. but in order to make the discussion clear and specific, it has been necessary to consider the ornament of particular coun- tries or groups of countries in separate chapters. it has seemed to the writer that for practical purposes such a treatment is far more serviceable, alike to the student and to the practical designer, than to divide the subject, for instance, by centuries. for each country or group has developed its own art along lines peculiar to itself, giving rise to certain national or regional styles, which should be studied each as a whole, rather than in sections scattered through a dozen period-chapters. the student will observe that about half of the volume is devoted to italian and french ornament; and that of these two subjects, italian ornament occupies double the space devoted to the french. there is good reason for these seeming disproportions. the italian styles were the parent-styles of all renaissance ornament, and of much the greater part of modern ornament. next to italy, france has exerted the greatest influence on the decorative arts of europe and america. moreover, the mere amount, to say nothing of the quality, of the prod- uct of italian and french art during the last five hundred years has been so vast that it outranks in wealth of suggestion and in variety of exemplars all the other styles that have grown up meanwhile. in general artistic quality, moreover, in beauty of line and move- ment, in charm of light-and-shade and relief, in refine- ment of form and execution, the ornament of no other nation of europe or america can rival that of italy and france, unless perhaps in a limited measure that of a history of ornament spain of the first half of the sixteenth century, called the plateresque. accordingly we find the museums, on both sides of the ocean, that make a feature of the in- dustrial and decorative arts, generally richer in ex- amples of italian and french art than in those of any other land outside of their own. as we come down the centuries toward our own time, the amount of material available for study naturally increases. we are completely surrounded by the prod- ucts of our own national art, and by those of our own time imported from abroad. these objects are at hand, familiar and abundant, and their quantity is constantly increasing: the student can examine and compare and analyze them for himself. it is, therefore, less important, in a history like this, intended for practical instruction, to devote to this later art as extended a discussion or as much space as to the earlier historic phases of the sub- ject. moreover, the historian is too near the subject to be able to judge fairly of its relations and importance; he requires a certain perspective, a certain distance from the objects or events discussed, to have or to inspire confidence in his judgments. accordingly these later developments of the history of ornament have been treated in a somewhat summary way, and the number of illustrations greatly restricted. the object has been rather to explain the movements and conditions out of which modern styles in ornament have been developed than to present anything like a complete survey of the endless varieties and phases of style in modern decora- tive design. what the modern designer and the student of styles alike need is a background of knowledge of introduction how the modern styles have come into being; a solid historic foundation of acquaintance with the work of preceding ages, an understanding of the incalculable wealth of our inheritance from those ages, a developed power of critical discrimination and appreciation de- rived from the study of the masterpieces of design be- queathed us by the past. the examples shown in the illustrations are intended to be suggestive, not exhaustive. they are offered not as models to be copied, but for their value in helping to reveal the secrets of the glory of historic art; as ex- emplars by the study of which we may be able to pene- trate to their true inner quality and thereby be helped to impart to the decorative art of our own time some- thing of those qualities that have been given a perma- nent life, a species of immortality to the works of past ages and other lands. for students who wish to carry their study further than the elementary surveys in this volume, the bibliographies supplied on pages - and at the end of each chapter offer a suggestive guide to some of the authorities. the literature of the subject is so enormous and so constantly augmented each year, that these lists cannot pretend to exhaustiveness, but they will be found helpful. the student will notice three classes of illustrations, referred to in the text in three differing manners. the line-cuts in the text are referred to by the abbrevia- tion "fig." followed by numerals in ordinary type. the half-tone illustrations, printed on plate-paper but bound in with the text, are referred to by the word "figure" followed by numerals in bold-faced type. a history of ornament the plates at the end of the volume are referred to by the word "plate" or the abbreviation "pi." followed by roman numerals, while the constituent illustrations of each plate are designated by arabic numerals in ordinary type following the roman numerals. each class of illustrations is separately numbered. general bibliography of renais- sance and modern ornament this list includes only those works which treat of several periods or styles. those which discuss only a single period or style are listed among the "books recommended" at the end of the chapter dealing with that style or period. the bibliography of renaissance and modern orna- ment is so voluminous that only a small part of the whole can be listed in a book of the character and dimensions of the present volume. the student wishing to search further into the vast literature of the subject will find in the subject-catalogues of the larger libraries many other titles equally important with those listed here and at the ends of chapters. nearly all of the works so listed are to be found in the avery architec- tural library of columbia university. no attempt has been made to refer to articles in periodicals, however interesting and important. the student will find in the volumes of the architectural and technical magazines a great wealth of information on the subject matter of this book, and for modern and recent art these periodicals are especially important; but to attempt the culling of references, hundreds in number, from them would overload the lists and expand the book unduly. even the art-trade magazines are valuable; and i may cite as the best of these in the a history of ornament united states for this purpose two: good furniture published by the dean-hicks co., grand rapids, mich.; and the current series of issues by the atlantic terra-cotta company of new york and atlanta, ga. . general manuals of ornament. c. blanc: grammaire des arts dscoratifs (paris, ).— h. dolmetsch: the historic styles of ornament (batsford, london, ).—r. glazier: a manual of historic ornament (batsford, london, ).—gropius und lohde: archiv fur ornament ale kunst (berlin, ).—w. h. l. gritner: speci- mens of ornamental art (mclean, london, ).—d. guilmard: la connaissance des styles de i'ornementation (guilmard, paris, ).—j. hauselmann: die stilarten des ornaments in den verschiedenen kunstepochen (zurich, ). h*. havard: la dicoration (delagrave, paris, ).—e. herdtle: flachenverzierungen des mittelalters und der re- naissance (hanover, ).—owen jones: grammar of orna- ment (day & son, london, ) ; (a smaller edition published in ).—f. s. meyer: handbook of ornament (hessling, new york, ).—h. pfeiffer: formenlehre des ornaments (kroner, stuttgart, ).—a. racinet: l'ornement poly- chrome (morel, paris, ).—g. semper: der styl in den technischen und tektonischen kiinsten (bruckmann, munich, ).—h. shaw: encyclopaedia of ornament (pickering, london, ).—a. speltz: styles of ornament (hessling, new york, ; batsford, london, ).—e. e. viollet- le-duc : de la decoration appliquee aux edifices (morel, paris, ).—j. e. wessely: das ornament und die kunstindustrie (berlin, strieker, ). for further references on ornament in general, consult the commented bibliography in introduction to my vol. , "his- tory of ornament, ancient and medieval," pp. - . general bibliography . on interiors and furniture in general. e. bajot: encyclopedie du meuble du xv sitcle jusqu'a nos jours (schmid, paris, ).—r. brock: elements of styte in furniture and woodwork (brock, london, ).— a. de champeaux: le meuble (bibl. de l'enseignement, etc., paris, ).—c. r. clifford: period furnishings (clifford & lawton, new york, ).—w. a. dyer: handbook of furniture styles (century co., new york, ).—h. d. ererlein: practical book of period furniture (lippincott, philadelphia, ).—h. havard: les arts de vameublement (delagrave, paris, ).—f. a. parsons: interior decora- tion; its principles and practice (doubleday-page, garden. city, n. y., ).—g. c. rothery: ceilings and their deco- ration (stokes, new york, n.d.). . for ironwork in general. hefner-alteneck: eisenwerke (keller, frankfort, ). —w. w. kent: architectural wrought-iron, ancient and modern (comstock, new york, ).—f. s. meyer: hand- buch der schmiedekunst (seemann, leipzig, ). . for textile design in general. bezon: dictionnaire general des tissus anciens et modernes (lepagnez, lyons, ).—dupont d'aurerville: art in- dustriel; vornement des tissus (lib. gen. arch., paris, ).— o. v. fame: decorative silks (helburn, new york, ). —fischrach: die geschichte der textilkunst (selbat, frank- fort, ).—g. l. hunter: decorative textiles (lippincott, philadelphia, ).—d. rock: textile fabrics (chapman & hall, london, ).—tissus anciens (paris, n.d.).—j. b. waring: examples of weaving and embroidery (day, lon- don, n.d.). . for lace in general. s. goldenrerg: lace, its origin and history (new york, ).—f. morris: antique laces of american collectors a history of ornament (helburn, new york, ).—e. muntz: tapisseries, brode- ries et denteu.es (lib. de l'art, paris, ).—mrs. palliser: history of lace (london, ).—j. seguin: la dentelle (rothschild, paris, ).—g. whiting: a lace guide for makers and collectors (dutton, new york, ; includes en exhaustive bibliography on lace). . for ceramics in general. th. deck: la faience (quantin, paris, ).—c. d. e. fortnum: majolica (scribners, new york, ).—a. jacquemart: histoire de la ceramique (paris, ).—l. jewitt: the ceramic art of great britain (virtue, london, ).—marryatt: collections towards a history of pottery and porcelain, th to th centuries (london, ).—g. vogt: la porcelaine (imp. reunies, paris, ). a history of ornament renaissance, and modern chapter i the renaissance in general meaning of the renaissance. the renaissance or renascence (called by the ital- ians rinascimento or risorgimento) is the name given to the great movement which displaced the ideals and intellectual habit of the middle ages in favor of the new ideals and mental processes on which modern learn- ing and civilization are founded. this movement em- phasized the intellectual freedom of the individual, his right to free inquiry and to the results of his own reason- ing, as against the right of either church or state to dictate in these matters. the revival of classical learn- ing, and the emancipation of art from the almost ex- clusive control by and service of the church, formed but one phase of this movement. the plastic arts took on a new direction because their emancipation from ecclesiastical control and the new spirit of free inquiry opened up to the designer new fields of activity and new sources of inspiration. the growing indulgence of personal luxury called for the building and adornment of palaces and gardens; civic pride and personal vanity stimulated the erection of splendid tombs and monu- a history of ornament ments; the public and private life of the great and high- placed took on a wholly new magnificence in costumes and furniture and trappings; all the arts of design were stimulated to an unexampled activity. but all this was the accompaniment of the new intellectual life of italy, with its eager questioning of the past and its ventures into new fields of inquiry. modern scholarship and modern science find their sources in this new and inde- pendent attitude of the italian mind toward authority, toward the past, toward nature and the universe. the precursors. the renaissance began in italy because in the city- states, in the municipalities and in the guilds of northern and central italy the spirit of independence and a grow- ing individualism had long been preparing the way for such a movement. it was no sudden upheaval; its origins can be traced far back in the middle ages, and no date can be set for its exact beginning. not only in italy, but elsewhere also in christian europe, there had been, long before the fifteenth century, individuals who had thought for themselves outside the categories of ecclesiastical teaching. as far back as the twelfth century there had been a wide intellectual awakening, both in and outside of the monasteries, then the chief centers of learning in europe. the travels of marco polo in the thirteenth century were an early prelude to the modern geographical conquests. niccolo pisano, who died in , found inspiration in roman sarcoph- agus-reliefs for his pulpit-sculptures in pisa and sienna. indeed, through the entire course of italian renaissance in general medieval decorative art there is traceable the unex- tinguished tradition of roman forms in capitals, arches and carved moldings. the exterior decorations of the florentine baptistery, dating from the end of the th century, with their round arches, their pilasters and entablatures (figure ); the nave of sienna cathedral, substantially com- pleted by , with its round arches, its classic archivolts, its cor- inthian capitals and ever - present acanthus leaves (some of these, however, being renaissance addi- tions in stucco), and a hundred other less conspic- uous examples be- tray this classic tradition. the re- awakened interest in antiquity, never wholly extinct in literature any more than in art, in the middle ages in italy, is conspicuous in the writings of the immortal trio, dante ( - ), boccaccio ( - ) and petrarch ( - ). giotto, who died in , may with justice be called the first painter of the renaissance, and many of the ornaments framing his frescoes in the church of mail fio. .—painted details from san francesco, assisi. a history of ornament st. francis at assisi seem to anticipate the rinceaux and acanthus leaves of the renaissance (fig. ). periods. it is customary and convenient to divide the history of the renaissance into periods. any such division must, however, be considered as a purely arbitrary device; for the movement of artistic evolution, growth, progress, culmination and decline is continuous when not interrupted by some great cataclysm. while in each period it is easy to recognize a character different, on the whole, from that of other periods, the change is gradual, not sudden. any historian of art is at liberty to make as many divisions as he pleases, where he pleases, and writers on the renaissance are not even agreed as to the time of its final extinction. some con- fine the term to the period previous to about ; others extend it to cover the whole seventeenth century; still others include even the eighteenth. the fact is that the intellectual movement of the renaissance has never come to an end, but is still vital in thought and learning, notwithstanding even the frightful upheaval of the great war. with its art the case is somewhat different, for the political revolutions of the end of the eighteenth century and the industrial and social revolu- tions of the nineteenth first checked the progress of art and then radically changed its direction. in this work i propose to use the term "renaissance" in its broadest sense, to cover the entire history of ornament from about to about or ; and to use the term "modern" for all the art of the g renaissance in general th and th centuries including that of the empire period and style in france. this being understood, it will be convenient to treat of renaissance ornament in four periods, dated as follows for the italian developments; all period-limits being taken as more or less elastic as one style-develop- ment gradually passed into the next: i. the early renaissance: to or ; the period of development and growth (the quattro- cento of the italians). ii. the middle oe high renaissance: or to about ; the period of increasing classical correctness and technical perfection (the cinquecento). iii. the baroque: to or later; the period of struggle between classical formalism and fantastic license, with increasing corruption of taste. iv. the decline and classic revival: to ; in which with declining taste and invention the baroque gave way to a cold and unimaginative copying of roman forms. periods iii and iv are not clearly separated, and might be merged into one gradually-changing decline. general character of renaissance ornament. in all phases of art the italians of the renaissance were preeminently decorators. in their painting as well as in their architecture, the decorative ideal is ever present. they were the finest craftsmen in europe in nearly every department of design; they were excellent builders, of remarkable resourcefulness in construction; but decorative effect in form and color was their a history of ornament supreme preoccupation. never in any other land .or age was there such an extraordinarily prolific produc- tion of beautiful objects, both for use and adornment, as in italy during the th and th centuries. buildings, gardens, church furniture, house furni- ture, textiles of every description, armor, bronzes, sculpture in all its forms, jewelry and every sort of object capable of receiving beauty of shape or of adornment, were designed with a sense of artistic fitness and values, with a discriminating taste, with a refine- ment of detail and execution, that have never before nor since been surpassed and rarely even approached (figs. , , , , ; figures , , ; pi . ii-v). the museums and palaces of the world have been enriched by thou- sands upon thousands of these works, yet the museums, churches and palaces of italy are still extraordinarily rich in masterpieces of this age. cities like florence, venice, sienna, are veritable treasuries of renaissance decorative art. civic, religious and private life seem to nave shared equally in this splendor of decora- tive equipment. a distinguishing characteristic of all the earlier renaissance ornament is the feeling for beauty of line and movement which it displays, and in which it sur- fig. .—b iohzi candelarrum, strozzi chapel, san andrea della v a l l e , rome. renaissance in general passes even its antique prototypes, both greek and roman. the handling of delicately modulated sur- faces, the patterning of light and shade, the space-filling fro. .—florentine or venetian marriage coffer, south kensington museum, london. and distribution of detail, are all dominated by a highly developed sense of the intrinsic beauty of rightly com- bined or contrasted curves, of the harmonious rhythm fig. .—rinceau from tomr in santa maria del popolo, rome. and swing and onward movement of the lines of the pattern (figs. , , ). this is a purely esthetic quality, a kind of sensuous beauty quite independent a history of ornament of symbolism and of any esoteric or recondite sig- nificance. in this it differs fundamentally from gothic ornament, which owes so much of its interest to its sym- bolism and to its religious and sentimental associations. gothic ornament was religious and ecclesiastical in its origin and character; renaissance ornament chiefly secular. yet there is also, especially in its sculptural decoration, much renaissance ornament that is full of pure and beautiful sentiment (see figures , , ). fio. .—flat relief ornament, marsuffini tomr in santa croce, florence. it is an unmerited reproach upon this age to regard it, as ruskin and some of his followers have done, as wholly given over to selfish luxury and irreligion, for the church was still the chief patron of art, and religion was still a mighty force in all departments of life. but there is no denying the growth of private luxury and of free-thinking along with the increasing liberation of the individual consciousness. this brought both gains and losses; but among the gains was the vital stimulus it gave to artistic activity and original creation. espe- cially noteworthy also is the growth of civic liberty, of the civic spirit, resulting in a remarkable advance in the beauty of cities. in comparison with florence, renaissance in general pisa, milan, venice and naples the great cities of france and england seemed only half-civilized, and their manners rude and coarse. architectural character. nearly all forms of italian ren- aissance ornament were primarily architectural, at least in origin, though they also occur, more or less modified, in many other of the decorative arts. this predom- inance of architectural character appears in the wood-carving and wood - inlaying of choir - stalls, tables, cabinets, cassoni or mar- riage-chests (see pi. iii); in the metalwork of candelabra, mast- bases, grilles, reliquaries and gold- smiths' work (see pi. iv and fig- ures - ); in painted ornaments and stucco embellishments (pi. tt\ j. • . cio. !>.—i'll.aster scroll, ii); in typographic ornaments, in town hall of verona. tapestries and many other forms of textile art. this is not surprising when we consider that well into the th century there was no sharp dividing line between architecture and the other arts of design. the early renaissance artists were architects, gold- smiths, sculptors, tarsiatori or woodvinlayers and painters as well as designers of buildings. raphael designed buildings, wood-carvings and stucco-decora- tions although preeminently a painter; peruzzi was an a history of ornament architect and a decorative painter; michelangelo an architect, engineer, sculptor and decorative painter. this close association of the various arts with archi- tecture was the occasion of both the strength and weak- ness of italian renaissance decorative art, or perhaps rather the explanation of certain defects in its archi- tecture and at the same time of the extraordinary merit of its decoration. for the italians decorated like archi- tects and designed their buildings like decorators, sacri- ficing sometimes structural expression and logical propriety to superficial beauty of decorative effect; as in many church facades treated as mere decorative screens for the body of the church behind them (figure ). this, however, was a practice not peculiar to the renaissance period; many of the italian medieval church-fronts were designed with similar disregard of the form of the church they screened. on the other hand, the architectural quality of renaissance decorative art in other fields of design is almost with- out exception an element of excellence, imparting to it the order, balance, rhythm and propriety which belong to architecture. italian renaissance ornament thus stands in in- structive contrast to moslem ornament; especially to the moorish and hispano-moresque, in which the archi- tectural decoration is dominated by the traditions of oriental rug-design and textile art. study of nature. one element of italian ornament in which it sur- passed its antique prototypes is its recourse to nature, renaissance in general which afforded a new inspiration to its designers and imparted a delicacy of detail, a freshness and charm to fig. .—festoon of olives, santa maria della pace, heme. their work, deserving of more notice than it has gener- ally received. while there was not much of out-and- out naturalistic representation of plant-forms, these, fig. .—two renaissance rosettes. even when conventionalized, are always handled in a manner indicating a keen appreciation of the laws and forms of plant-growth (figs. , , , ). human a history of ornament figures, dolphins, lions' heads, birds, wings and feathers, to whatever extent conventionalized, are always true to the character and structure of the life from which they are de- rived (figs. , , , , , ; figures , , ; pi. ii-iv). italian renaissance ornament is generally distinguished by a keen sense of decorative pro- priety, especially in scale or the relations of dimension between the various elements of the com- position, and between those ele- ments and the whole; space-fill- ing or the artistic distribution of the motives of decoration over the space to be decorated; beauty of movement in lines and masses; and, in plastic ornament, the handling of relief, with its varied play of light and shade (fig. ; figures , ). fig. illustrates the sym- pathetic treatment of animal form, and the swing and grace of line-movement characteristic of italian decorative design. %m fio. .—pilaster detail, san giorre, venice. classic origins. while the ornament of the italian renaissance was founded upon the study of roman decorative art, it was renaissance in general never an art of mere copyists or imitators. nearly every distinctive ornament-motive in the plastic arts of the renaissance in italy can be related to a roman prototype, but it is almost impossible to find a direct copy of a roman motive, except in the sixteenth-cen- tury reproductions of the roman corinthian order and certain architectural forms whose use had never wholly fio. .—griffin from tomr in san domenico maggiore, naples. ceased in italy after the fall of rome. even in employ- ing these forms the italians departed widely from the roman practice, altering the details and proportions, and devising wholly new combinations by which they produced decorative effects entirely original with them- selves. the acanthus-leaf, the anthemiort, the rinceau, the egg-and-dart, the dentil and modillion, which one can trace uninterruptedly from the days of ancient rome through the entire middle ages to the renais- sance in italy, were all endlessly varied and trans- formed into new shapes. the grotesques and symbolic a history of ornament forms of antique art were likewise revived, their pagan significance being ignored, or new meanings attached to them. infant forms—the "genii" of roman sym- bolism—became the amorini and putti of the renais- fio. .—entarlature, porch chapel of palazzo purrlico, sienna. sance, and were modeled with great charm of realism (figs. , ). the festoons and wreaths of flowers and fruit carved on roman temples were transferred from their pagan sacrificial significance to christian funereal symbolism, or used purely as decorations. griffins, sphinxes, masks or "mascarons," and other renaissance in general "grotesque" forms, symbolic in pagan art, were em- ployed freely, sometimes perhaps symbolically, more often purely*as ornaments, for their intrinsic decorative value {e.g., the griffins in figs. , , the masks and grotesques in figs. , , , ). trophies of arms and armor were imitated from roman models for use on tombs of warriors. to these were added many \akez .q fio. .—mascaron, palazzo fossomrroni, arezzo. motives of christian origin and significance, such as the winged cockle-shell, the symbol of life's pilgrimage, the cross, the agnus dei, the winged cherub-head,.and later the palm-branch of the martyr and the victor. the personal factor. all the art of the renaissance is intensely personal. a history of its architecture is a history of the works of particular architects, and the "schools" of renaissance painting are the groups of pupils and imitators of one and another great master. so is it with the more im- portant, at least, of the works of italian decorative art; each is the work of a master or of a group whose names have come down to us, and each master has his peculiari- ties of conception and treatment which distinguish his a history of ornament work from others of the same class. this emphasis of personality had for centuries been more or less an italian characteristic as compared with the medieval art of western europe, where the individual artist was lost in the corporate entity of his monastery or guild, and where style was corporate, local or provincial rather than personal. the ren- aissance movement, which insisted on the rights of the individual, emphasized this tendency of italian art to- ward personal expression, and communicated it to the other countries to which it spread from italy. the beginnings in florence although the roots of the renaissance penetrate far into the middle ages, it was in the th century that the movement became insistent, fro. i .-sc.oxx, pazzi cha«l. seneral and controlling, first in florence, as the most artistic city in italy and the one animated by the most intense and independent civic and intellectual life. great works and great men, early in that century, gave opportunity in florence for a splendid efflorescence of the new taste and ideals. the powerful personality of brunelleschi ( - ), asserting itself in the colossal dome of the duomo and revealing the results of his renaissance in general years of study of the roman monuments in the details of the pazzi chapel (fig. ; figure ) and other works, stamped its impress upon the architecture of his time. lorenzo ghiberti ( - ) in his second pair of doors for the florentine baptistery—those for the eastern entrance (figure )—exhibited the influence of the new taste in a com- plete change of style from that of his earlier pair for the northern doors of the same build- ing. luca della rob- bia ( - ) exe- cuted for the porch and for the dome of brunel- leschi's pazzi chapel decorative reliefs in enameled terra - cotta, of great charm in a style full and free, as far removed as possible from that which had prevailed during the preceding half-century; and the kind of decorative work in terra-cotta which he origi- nated and which his nephew and grand-nephews de- veloped, employed in its ornamental details a combina- tion of forms derived from the classic with others drawn directly from nature (figs. , ; figure ). luca's and andrea's handling of fruit and foliage in the frames and borders of their medallions and lunettes is especially noteworthy. fig. .—faurr border ry luca dei.la rorria, from medallion in quaratesi palace, florence. a history of ornament thus the study of nature went hand-in-hand with the study of the antique. the progress of this latter study may be seen by comparing, for instance, the architec- tural designs of michelozzi (e.g., the riccardi palace) with those of alberti [e.g., the rucellai palace). they were contemporaries, but alberti's study of the antique was far more detailed than michelozzi's. during the second half of the th century florence and the neigh- boring cities and villages of tuscany produced an ex- traordinary group and succession of masters of decora- tion—sculptors, goldsmiths, inlayers and woodworkers —gifted with a surpassing sense of decorative effect, with remarkable skill in workmanship, and with a refinec taste which seldom erred, whose tombs, shrines, choir- stalls and pulpits are a priceless legacy to art, and an inspiration to designers of our own day. these quattro- centisti as they are called, although taking their inspira- tion from antique art contented themselves with a very free rendering of roman models, combining and varying them in original and almost always charming ways (figs. , , - ; pi. i). their most successful works were those in which decoration and not construc- tion was the essential consideration. in the more severe and monumental forms of architectural design they were less successful; least so in church facades, though some of these are so beautiful as to excuse in a measure their lack of structural expressiveness (figure ). the cinquecento. the masters of the first half of the th century, the cinquecentisti, developed their style of decoration 'miclielozzo michelozzi, - ; leo battista alberti, - . renaissance in general along more strongly architectural lines than their pre- decessors. while raphael was primarily a painter and michelangelo a sculptor, both were also architects. bramante, peruzzi, the san galli, vignola and the venetian sansovino were primarily architects, though peruzzi was also a painter and sansovino a sculptor. architecture was developing as a distinct art, and the architects were bestowing more care than their pre- decessors upon the composition and architectural membering of their buildings, basing them upon a more detailed and minute study of antique models. the classic orders and the roman type of arcade came into more general use (see p. ); ornament was less minute and less exuberant: scale was better understood; while stucco-relief combined with painting supplied new re- sources for interior decoration. the loggie of the vatican, the camera della segnatura and the borgia apartments in the vatican, the villa madama, the palazzo del te at mantua, the farnesina at rome, furnish superb examples of the architectural decoration and ornament of the golden age of the italian renais- sance (figure ; pi . ii). the later phases. the second half of the th century witnessed the culmination and the beginnings of the decline of this phase of italian art. a growing impatience of the restrictions and grammar of the antique roman models led to bold and sometimes unhappy innovations in the effort after originality. palladio, michelangelo— whose long career began in the late quattrocento and a history of ornament extended into the early baroque; maderna, bernini, the brilliant baroque sculptor-architect, and borromini, the most extravagant exponent of the new taste, led in this movement of retrogression, to which the fatal facil- ity and cheapness of stucco lent its constant temptation to sham splendor and meretricious display (figures - ; pi. vi). the jesuit order, officially consti- tuted in , grew rich and powerful during the suc- ceeding century, and by the erection of many churches marked by a pretentious and often deceptive mag- nificence, exercised a disastrous influence on ecclesi- astical decoration. the name of baroco or baroque has been given to this development of style, which gradually merged into the classic revival of the th century. it exhibits at times certain admirable notes of ingenuity, vigor, original and effective combinations of form and a striking play of light and shade. but there is also so much that is cheap, vulgar and gaudy that it is generally considered as marking the extinction of the artistic spirit which made brilliant the first century and a half of the renaissance (see chapter v). the classical reaction. during the th century there was a notable reaction from the extravagance of the baroco. designers, alike of architecture and of ornament, returned to the study of the antique and produced a number of works of considerable merit, marked by dignity and severity of design after the classic manner. but the springs of artistic invention seem to have been well-nigh exhausted, figure . tomr of ilaria pel caretto, luca cathedral. fioure . cantoria ry luca dei.la rorria. renaissance in general and these works are generally as cold as they are correct, and singularly lacking in vitality. spread of the style. the renaissance in the arts of decoration began in florence, spread slowly thence through northern italy and eastward to venice between and ; south- ward at the same time to sienna and rome, producing in sienna and pienza a number of important works about . its first appearance in rome dates from about , and about the same time florentine and other north-italian artists carried the movement to naples and later to sicily. by the new style was established throughout the entire peninsula. florence, venice and rome may be considered the three most important centers of this development and spread; milan, pavia, sienna, bologna and verona come next to these in importance. the movement entered south germany, austria and bohemia through the medium of works by italian artists during the closing years of the th century; invaded france as a result of the italian campaigns of charles viii, louis xii and francis i, but at first only through sporadic works by imported italians. it was francis i who made the foreign fashion the official and royal style of france, but in a form so changed as to create a wholly new and peculiarly french version of the style ( - ). the spaniards carried back with them from the battle of pavia a fresh impulse to stimulate the movement of the new style which had for twenty years been gathering momentum and volume a history of ornament at the hands of both italian and native artists; while henry viii took back to england torregiano and john of padua and new ideas of architecture and decoration. there, however, the renaissance movement was chiefly promoted by german, dutch and flemish artists, as we shall later see, holland having herself received the impulse from germany, and flanders from italy and france. it was not till or perhaps even that the last vestiges of gothic design dis- appeared from northern and western europe. russia, greece and turkey remained outside of renaissance influence for a century longer, and never wholly aban- doned their national styles; but the th-century baroque crept even into these countries and set its modifying stamp upon the local art. books recommended: w. j. anderson: the architecture of the renaissance in italy (batsford, london, ).—j. blrckhardt: the ren- aissance in italy (holt, new york, ); der cicerone (seemann, leipzig, ); also an edition in french.— j. durm: die baukunst der renaissance in italien (bcrg- strasser, stuttgart; also later edition pub. by gebhardt, leipzig, ).—galland und rosenkranz: italienische renaissance (lemmc, leipzig, ).—t. j. jackson: the renaissance of roman architecture (univ. press, cambridge, ).—g. scott: the architecture of humanism (hough- ton, boston, ).—schutz: die renaissance in italien (strumpcr, hamburg, ).—j. a. stmonds: the renais- sance in italy: the fine arts 'holt, new york, ). chapter ii the eahly renaissance in italy the precursors. the real beginnings of renaissance art are to be sought, as we have already observed, in many scattered manifestations of a new spirit in design in the fourteenth and even the thirteenth century. the classic traditions o f shaft and capital, round arch and hori- z o n t a entablature, acanthus leaf and rin- ceau had never lost their vitality in italy (figure ; fig. ). the definitive recourse to antique models for inspiration in sculpture had been foreshadowed by niccolo p i s a n o ( - ); and giotto ( - ) had for- saken byzantine types for the study of nature in his paintings. in the pseudo-gothic "mandorla" doorway fig. .—rinceau from mandorla door, cathedral op florence. a history of ornament of the florentine duomo ( ) the acanthus-moldings and almost classic rinceau are an earnest of the coming renaissance in decorative detail (fig. ). the italian gothic style had been always a foreign fashion modified and adapted to serve as a dress for buildings designed after the old romanesque tradition, itself descended from the roman; it was an interruption to the natural process of the evolution of italian architecture along its own national and racial lines. to turn to the antique was merely to resume more actively this partially in- terrupted evolution. between the th-century decora- tions by talenti of the east end of the cathedral of florence and brunelleschi's work around the base of the dome there is no such discrepancy of style or method as the names of gothic and renaissance would seem to imply. early renaissance masters. three architects—brunelleschi, michelozzi and al- berti—have already been mentioned; also two sculptors, luca della robbia and ghiberti; to whom, if we add donatello, we have the sextet of great men who gave form and direction to the new movement. second only to these was giacopo della quercia ( - ), whose work, however, is not found at florence but at sienna and lucca (figure ; fig. ). the labors of these seven enriched italy during the middle quarters of the th century with a number of epoch-making master- pieces. in architecture we have, for instance, besides the colossal dome of the duomo at florence the lovely "donato niccolb di betti bardi, - . early renaissance in italy pazzi chapel ( - ) in the court of santa croce (figure ); the two renaissance basilicas of san spirito and san lorenzo; the foundling hospital or innocenti, and the beginning of the vast pitti palace, all by brunelleschi; the church of the annunziata and the noble riccardi palace ( ) by michelozzi and the rucellai palace by alberti, all these being in florence; the great church of san andrea at mantua and the much smaller church of san francesco (cap- pella malatestiana) at rimini, by alberti; and a large number of lesser works of great beauty. in decorative sculpture the east doors of the baptistery of florence by ghiberti ( - ) clearly mark a new era by their complete change in style from the north doors which ghiberti had not yet finished when he received the com- mission for these (figure ). the charming terra- cotta decorations by luca della robbia for the porch of the pazzi chapel, and numerous lunettes and medal- lions in the same medium by luca and his successors, are in the full spirit of the renaissance in their refined naturalism and complete absence of medieval tradition- alism and stiffness (figures , , ). della quercia's lovely monument to ilaria del caretto in the cathedral of lucca is adorned with a series of nude infants sup- porting huge festoons or swags, a motive frankly de- rived from the antique and interpreted with naive simplicity and excellent decorative effect (fig. ; figure ). a like naive naturalism appears in the sculptures of the two cantorie or balconies for singers by della robbia and donatello, formerly in the cathedral, now in the opera del duomo at florence a history of ornament (figure ). in these one observes a still incomplete mastery of classic details: a phenomenon to which we may presently recur. the latter part of the century witnessed the wide expansion of the style, as well as the appearance of a new generation of decorative artists of great ability, many of them florentines, or at least tuscans, who worked in vari- ous towns of northern italy, in rome and even in naples. among these men two brothers were oonspicuous— giuliano and benedetto da majano as architects and decorative de- signers, working in florence, naples and elsewhere. bernardo rossellino was active in rome, sienna and pienza as an architect of the school of alberti. desi- derio da settignano and mino da fiesole worked as decorative sculptors and architects in florence, fiesole and elsewhere; matteo civitale in like manner at lucca; the family of pietro lombardi at venice as •giuliano baglioni da majano, - ; his brother benedetto, - ; bernardo di matteo (gambarelli) rossellino, - . •desidcrio da settipnano, - ; mino da fiesole, - . 'matteo civitale, - ; pietro lombardi (solari), - . fio. .—"putti" and festoon, tomr of i laria uel caretto, lucca. early renaissance in italy architects; at pavia a group of artists which included omodeo, borgognone and about thirty pupils and assistants. andrea della robbia ( - ), nephew of luca, and his sons after him, continued the tradi- tion of glazed terra-cotta sculpture established by his uncle and elaborated it with new colors and effects in altar-pieces and architectural embellishments. an- drea's work is equal to luca's in beauty and as full of the spirit of religious devotion (figure ). an- tonio (averulino) filarete ( - ?) at milan, benedetto di briosco at milan and pavia, agostino di duccio ( - ) at perugia and rimini are others among the great host of artists who blended architecture, sculpture and the minor arts in works of remarkable beauty throughout italy, especially north- ern italy. the renaissance in lombardy. the province of lombardy contains the cities of milan, pavia, cremona, brescia, bergamo and mantua, all of them interesting to the student of renaissance architecture and ornament. the renaissance move- ment seems to have reached these cities about the middle of the th century; it rapidly effloresced into full splendor. the abundance of clay and the general use of terra-cotta and brick encouraged profusion and minuteness of ornament, and the superb facade of the certosa at pavia (about - ) is the most ornate facade produced during the renaissance in italy: the work of a whole school of artists including ama- 'giovanni antonio omodeo or amadeo, - . a history of ornament deo, formentone, borgognone, bambaia, brambilla, cristoforo lombardo and others (figure ). it is, like so many other italian church-facades, an archi- tectural screen, an illuminated frontispiece, having little relation to the gothic church behind it, and displaying curious inconsistencies of scale. but every detail is in itself so perfect, the execu- tion so exquisitely wrought in fine marble, the color har- mony so pleasing, that it dis- arms criticism. the semi- gothic brick and marble fa- cade of the great hospital at milan ( ) by an- tonio filarete; the over-or- nate facade of the miracoli church at brescia (cir. - , figure ); the col- leone chapel at bergamo by amadeo; the court and por- tal of the stanga palace at cremona (the portal re- moved to the louvre mu- seum at paris), are among the buildings which best ex- emplify the richness, delicacy and charm of lom- bard ornament. the early works of bramante and his pupils at milan (east end and portal of santa maria delle grazie, and the sacristy of san satiro), • donato i) pier capital, bologna. fig. .—pilaster, venice. fig. .—column from spei.lo. fig. .—four entarlatures, from riccardi, strozzi, and gondi palaces, florence, and palazzo pretorio, lucca. j early renaissance in italy roman type, often erroneously called the "scamozzi" capital. the composite capital—or at least its much- varied derivatives—occurs quite frequently, coming next to the corinthian type in frequency (fig. b, c; pi . , ). bases and pedestals. bases of columns and pilasters were almost always of the attic type, with a scotia between two tori above a square plinth. they were rarely enriched by carving. ornamented pedestals or pedestal-blocks were some- times used, as in the miracoli church at brescia, where the corners of the pedestal are adorned with acanthus leaves. a highly original and beautiful device is seen in the columns of the choir of san zaccaria at venice (about ), in which a high octagonal pedestal is so blended with the shaft of the column as to form a single composition (fig. ). the result is so beautiful and so logical that one wonders that it was never repeated or imitated elsewhere, except once in spain (see p. ). shafts. pilaster-shafts (fig. ) were sometimes left plain, more often they were fluted, occasionally with the lower third of the channels filled with convex beads, as in the tomb of lionardo bruno in sta. croce at florence by bernardo rossellino (cir. ), and in the interior of sta. catarina at sienna (pi. i, ). still oftener the pilaster-shaft was treated as a long panel in a frame of delicate moldings and decorated with carved rin- ceaux, single or double, or with delicate arabesques a history of ornament (figs. , , , , ). this treatment, of which there were but few roman prototypes, became one of the most beautiful and characteristic elements in the architectural decoration of the early renaissance, and persisted through the middle renaissance. □ □□□ fio. .—column in san zaccaria, venice. fig. .—three types of pilaster treat- ment. the shafts of columns were always left plain in arcades of courts or churches, and sometimes in porches and doorways. they were sometimes, though not very often, fluted in minor works, such as tombs and pulpits, early renaissance in italy where the columns are generally engaged and not free- standing: e.g. the beautiful pulpit in sta. croce at florence (figure ). a characteristic and not in- frequent treatment for free or engaged columns is to carve the lower part of the shaft in relief, with arabesques, festoons and other ornaments, leaving the upper two thirds plain or fluting it, as in the over-rich porch of sta. maria dei miracoli at brescia (figure ). some- times the whole shaft is covered with carv- ing, as in the exam- ple from spello (fig. ); but this is exceptional. unjltuuuuullulfuuu entablatures and moldings. the classic type of entablature with architrave, frieze and cornice had never passed wholly out of use in italy during the middle ages. it appeared with increasing fre- quency as the th century drew near, and during that century the classic types were more closely fol- lowed. the modillion cornice was used to crown palace- fio. .—entarlature of shrine, ma- donna del sasso, blbbiena. a history of ornament facades, as in the magnificent example on the riccardi palace ( ) and the later strozzi palace ( , fig. ); but in neither case are the roman proportions fol- lowed. in the rucellai palace alberti patterned his cornice after the upper cornice of the colosseum at rome (figure ), but this long remained an isolated instance of such close imitation. on smaller buildings, and on porches and minor works such as tombs, the modillion cornice is not common, the denticular type being generally preferred (figs. , ; figure ). on the other hand these minor works display an extra- ordinary richness of decoration in their entablatures, almost every molding being carved, and the face of the corona frequently enriched with vertical flutings, as in the upper part of the porch-chapel of the palazzo pubblico at sienna by federighi (about ; fig. ), and on many tombs. the corona of the riccardi palace is similarly ornamented. the molding-enrichments are the usual roman ornaments of beads, bead-and-reel, egg-and-dart, water-leaf and acanthus leaf, but treated with great freedom: the oves or "eggs," for instance, often showing nearly the whole oval, and being made much wider than in most roman examples (see figs. , , , and pi. , , ). the florentine pediment. until the high renaissance developed the monu- mental use of roman features, the classic triangular pediment was seldom employed except over doorways and tombs, and rarely over these in florence. the florentine designers preferred to place over them a early renaissance in italy wall-arch, framed in a richly-decorated archivolt and enclosing a tympanum or "lunette" adorned with a medallion or with figure sculpture. at the spring of the archivolt were often two small rosettes over the projecting ends of the cornice (fig. ). this device was frequent in lom- bardy as well as florence, and was carried by lom- bard artists to venice in the second half of the th century; but it was there soon replaced by semicircular and seg- mental pediments even to crown principal facades, as in the churches of san zaccaria, sta. maria dei miracoli and the scuola di san marco. in milan, como and perugia are a num- ber of semicircular arched canopies over church doors. an unusually elegant example of the triangular pedi- ment of almost classical correctness of proportion and detail is shown in figure , from the church of san michele, venice. but such examples are rare before . candelabrum forms. the use of the candelabrum motive in lombardy has already been referred to (see p. ). derived from roman candelabra in bronze and marble, and from representations in roman reliefs, it was used in fio. .—typical florentine arch pediment. a history of ornament a great variety of ways, not only in lombardy but in other parts of italy as well. its essential feature is the vertical stem, swelling upwards from the bottom and then contracting in a graceful curve, the lower part often swathed in acanthus leaves and springing from a spreading acanthus nest. in very slender form it appears in the central stem of pilaster ara- besques; in more massive form it is used for actual supports such as mul- lions or even columns (see ante p. , fig. ); and in shorter and still more massive proportions, to carry fonts, holy water stoups, even pulpits (fig. ). in the high renaissance it suggested the balustrade, as will be later shown. arches and spandrels. fio. .—standard .or holy water the quattrocento treated arches r ont, badia ^ fiesolana. with great freedom, using the classic banded archivolt only in the more monumental forms of architecture (fig. ), and not always then. in tuscany, at least in florence and sienna, the rusticated arch was common in palace facades (see also pi. i, ). in lombardy and emilia the prevalent use of terra-cotta induced the habit of minute ornamentation of archivolts in relief. in minor works throughout all north italy there was great variety in the decoration of archivolts, which were sometimes radially fluted and adorned with enriched early renaissance in italy moldings on both intrados and extrados. especially characteristic of the early renaissance was the decora- tion of archivolts with wreaths or bands of fruit fio. .—spandrel from a chapel in genoa cathedral. (figures , ), or with laurel bands as in fig. (see also fig. ). the soffits were usually plain, though sometimes paneled and rosetted. figs. , and illustrate a few of the varieties of this decoration. a history of ornament spandrels of arches were seldom left plain. in ex- terior architecture medallions were the most common ornament, sometimes sculptured, sometimes exe- .. -.. cuted in della-rob- bia ware. in minor wo r k s sculptured figures, heads, rin- ceau motives and ar- abesques appear (figs. , ). the acanthus; ara- besques. throughout the middle ages the italians had never ceased to use the acanthus leaf, either in carved or painted ornament. italian gothic foliage never followed the french forms, but was al- ways modeled after the type of the clas- sic acanthus (see ante, fig. ). the renaissance naturally gave fresh vogue to this most adaptable of all foliage forms; but it is worthy of notice that the early artists seldom or never copied the roman leaf textually; they modeled their acanthus foliage after fig. .—acanthus decorations, and bologna. venice figure . lunette ry luca della rorria. figure . altarpiece ry andrea della rorria. early renaissance in italy their own fashion, with delightful^ freedom and variety. whether in their corinthianesque capitals or in the details of their foliated scrolls or rinceaux and arabesques, it is treated with the same delicacy and fro. .—acanthus from sarcophagus of mar- suppini, santa croce, florence. variety of relief as all the other motives of their carved ornament (fig. ). two of the most notable examples of the acanthus appear on sarcophagi of tombs. the first (fig. ) decorates the tomb of marsuppini in a history of ornament fio. .—acanthus from tomr of piero di medici, san lorenzo, florence. the church of santa croce at florence, by desiderio da settignano; it dates from about , the second forms a part of the bronze enrichments of the tomb of piero di medici in the "old sacristy" of san lorenzo in the same city (fig. ; figure ); it is by ver- rocchio, dated about , and is a decoration of ex- traordinary splendor and vigor of design and ex- quisite execution. certain bronze torch-holders set in the walls of siennese palaces are also masterly examples of the decorative use of the acanthus (fig. ). fig. shows nine varieties of the renaissance acanthus, * andrea di cione, nicknamed verroechio (true-eye); florentine gold- smith and sculptor, - . fig. .—acanthus from torch bracket, sienna. selected from the scores or hundreds of variant treat- ments to be found in both the architecture and the minor arts of the early renaissance. • the examples of the acanthus leaf in fig. are but a few among the almost innumerable italian variations of the motive. they are taken from a variety of works in stone and marble, bronze and wood. professor moore in his "character of renaissance architecture" disparages the in- ventiveness and the feeling for natural beauty of the italian renaissance artists in comparison with the greek, as shown by the greek and italian acanthus respectively in the illustrations he presents. it is of course easy to select in any style one or two details inferior to corresponding details a history of ornament while painted arabesques word arabesque itself belong fio. .—araresque panel, "giant's stairs," doge's palace, venice. and the invention of the properly to the th cen- tury, the early artists made free use of the carved arabesque, especi- ally for panels (fig. ) and pilasters, preferring this treatment of pilasters to the more formal fluting of the shaft. in the pilas- ter-arabesques there was generally the combination of a central stem or axis composed of vases, can- delabrum-forms and fan- ciful stalks, with symmet- rically-diverging acan- thus leaves, as in fig. , or with branching foli- ated scrolls to flank them on either side, the whole treated in a light, grace- ful and fanciful manner (figs. , , , b). examples from the pazzi chapel at florence in another style. but comparing the italian examples as a whole .with the greek as a whole, one must, i think, admit that in variety, flexibility of adaptation, beauty of movement and delicacy and suavity of modeling the italians far surpassed the greeks. this is, indeed, not surprising, for the italians inherited the acanthus from the romans, who had carried its development far beyond the point at which the greeks had left it to them. (see my hist, of orn., i, - .) early renaissance in italy ( - ) and san francesco at rimini ( ) show the inexperience of early efforts (figs. , ); the de- tails are thin and tight. the carvers of tuscany and lombardy very soon acquired skill and developed the exquisite technic of carving already described. as time went on there was an increasing use of grotesques— griffins, harpies, and other animal and human figures, often ending" in acan- thus leaves and scrolls (figs. , , , ). the rinceau. this is the french name—for which there is no exact equivalent in english —for a branching foliated scroll in which a continuous waving stem throws off alternately on either side spiral branches terminating in rosettes or bunches of leaves, each branching being concealed by a wrapping acan- thus leaf or caulicolus. the whole composition generally springs from a vase, a monster's tail, an infant's torso, or a large and elaborate nest of acan- thus leaves (figs. , b, , ). the rinceau is the most prolific, the most persistent and the most adaptable of all decorative motives. it can be traced through the whole history of m the history and origin of this very characteristic roman ornament are briefly recited in my "history of ornament, ancient and medieval," i, pp. , , , . fio. .—flat re- lief ornament from a tomr dated . a history of ornament medieval and renaissance art, and appears even in oriental art, especially that of india. in fig. it was shown in italian pre-renaissance ornament of the th century; figs. , and in my "history of or- fio. .—two araresoues: (a) san francesco di rimini; ( ) badia flesolana. nament, ancient and medieval" illustrate its appear- ance in italian and french romanesque ornament. in the italian renaissance, both early and late, it was ap- plied to the greatest possible variety of uses in architec- tural carving, in painted ornament, in woodwork, metal- early renaissance in italy work, embroidery, laces and ceramics, and treated with a sensitive appreciation of relief, detail and distribution. fio. .—panel, altar in orvieto cathedral. as a vertical running ornament, symmetrically doubled on either side at a central stem, it was the favorite fio. .—araresque, villa salviati, florence. pilaster-ornament; on friezes it commonly extended both ways from a central motive; as a restricted pattern, it was used as panels of any and every shape. figs. , early renaissance in italy , , , , , - illustrate a few of these applications; others will be recognized in many later illustrations. the anthemion. next in importance to the rinceau as a frieze decora- tion was the anthemion-motive. as used by the renais- sance artists this varied all the way from close approxi- mation to the roman type as in fig. and in the . io. .—detail of frieze over door, ducal palace, urrino. smaller frieze in fig. , to wholly novel versions like the example from urbino in fig. , or that from florence in fig. , in which only the fundamental principle of the anthemion remains, the classic honey- suckle-like motives being replaced by sprays of wheat and other plant forms, highly conventionalized. it must be understood that by the anthemion-motive is meant not merely the greek ornament derived from a history of ornament the palmette, but the entire combination of two con- trasting forms set vertically and linked by reversed curves or voluted bands; the one originally derived from fio. .—anthemion from a cast is florence. the palmette, the other from the lotus; the one often framed in an oval, the other never so enclosed. the basic idea of both features of the combined motive is a fio. .—detail, chimneypiece in doge's palace, venice. central vertical stem springing from between voluted scrolls, and flanked on either side by diverging leaves, which may be of any desired form taken from any sort of plant real or imaginary (figs. , ). separate u see my "history of ornament, ancient and medieval," pp. - , , , and figs. , , , . early renaissance in italy anthemions were often enclosed between, or sprung from, two reversed-curve scrolls forming a "lyre" or heart-shaped motive, as in fig. , from the stucco decorations of a pier in the court of the palazzo vecchio at florence. a variant of this is shown in fig. , from a tomb in naples. renaissance anthemion-ornaments occur not only in carved ornament but also in wood-inlay, painted decorations and textiles (pi. v, , ). the rosette. this occurs in nearly all the his- toric styles of ornament, and may represent almost any of a great fio. .—typical lyre motives from piers in court of palazzo vecchio, florence. fig. si.—detail from tomr of cassandra^ misata, naples. variety of flower-forms. in renaissance practice it is so conventionalized as generally to defy identification with any particular plant, and varies from such simple five-leaved blossoms as those shown in fig. to the a history of ornament most elaborate compositions of acanthus leaves or of anthemions as in fig. . the festoon or swag. this, as already explained (p. ), was in roman art a sacrificial emblem, carved only on altars and temples, to represent festoons of fruit, flowers and leaves suspended between ox-skulls or bucrania sym- fio. .—detail from fossomrroni palace, arezzo. bolizing the victims of previous sacrifices, and bound with ribbons or fillets with fluttering ends (hist, of orn., i, fig. ). this motive the renaissance trans- ferred to christian funereal symbolism, omitting the bucrane, and supporting it either from rosettes or from the shoulders of infants, as on the tomb at lucca of ilaria del caretto (fig. , figure ). usually com- posed of continuous "ropes" of fruit and flowers (fig. ), it was sometimes made up of separate bunches of these, or of sprays of leaves and berries, as in figs. early renaissance in italy and and figure . the motive thus originating in symbolism soon passed into purely decorative use as a pure ornament. there is no sharp distinction between fro. s .—festoon, base of pilaster in santa maria dei miracom, venice. those of the quattrocento and of the early cinquecento. the beautiful isolated swags on tombs by sansovino in sta. maria del popolo at rome and on the screen in the sistine chapel have all the charm of the early renaissance with the assured technic of the th century (see figure ). fruit and flowers. the early renaissance artists represented fruit and flowers with sympathetic naturalism, combining them more or less conventionally with a keen and unerring sense of decorative values. the della robbias, as we have seen, modeled them with consummate art in the borders to their lunettes, altar- pieces and medallions (see figure and fig. ). the fio. .—fruit from alrer- toni monument, santa maria del popolo, rome. a history of ornament festoon or swag, both in the early and middle renais- sance, always displayed a careful study and conscien- fig. .—"pirn" and wreath, doorway of pazzi chapel, santa croce, florence. tious modeling of fruit, flowers and foliage. in the anthemion patterns generally, floral and foliage forms were treated in con- ventional rather than naturalistic fashion. figure swilpture. while pure figure sculpture, as such, does not properly be- long in the category of pure ornament, the use of the human figure as an ele- ment of a decorative scheme and not as an independent work brings it within that category. the ital- ians of the renais- sance, with their newly awakened love fig. .—arove, "putti" and shield, archrishop's palace, florence; relow, detail from tomr at folleville, france, ry ant. tamagno. early renaissance in italy of natural beauty could not fail to discover and employ the nobly decorative forms of the human figure in both carved and painted ornament, and they studied it with passionate enthusiasm. here, as in other details, they took their inspiration primarily from roman art, but developed their ideas independently. they were especi- ally fond of the infant form, which they han- dled with great sympa- thy and charm (figs. , , , , ). the putti or bambini by andrea della robbia on the facade of the foundling hospital at florence, and luca and andrea della robbia's lunettes and altar decorations (see figures , ), are early examples of this charm of treatment; but it is displayed in countless carved deco- f" - .—mascaron and araresque from a column of tomr in san domenico rations ot later date, maooiore, naples. and appears even in works of the baroque period. the adult figure also occurs frequently, and both human and animal forms are carved with careful regard to anatomical propriety, even in grotesques (figs. , , ; pi. iv, , ). in all this sculptured decoration one recognizes an al- a history of ornament most unerring sense of beauty of line and surface and of decorative propriety in the composition. grotesques. in its applications to panels of various shapes as well as to figures the rinceau motive was frequently asso- fig. .—grotesques from lirrary of san lorenzo, florence, attriruted to michelangelo. ciated with grotesques, as in roman ornament. the word "grotesque" is used in two different significations: originally by the italians to designate the fanciful arabesques imitated from roman ruins on the esquiline hill called "the grottoes"; more generally in a technical sense to-day to designate any combination of hetero- early renaissance in italy geneous parts or features of animals, human figures or plants into an artistic whole. infant forms were made to terminate in acanthus-nests from which issued the stem of the rinceau (fig. ); the tails of griffins or chimeras, of lions or other beasts, and the beard and hair of grotesque faces or sjx r pulpits, etc. (see pi. iii, , , ; pi. iv, ), the dolphin combined with acanthus leaves (fig. a), purely fantastic dragons or nameless monsters, like that in fig. and pi. iii, , , , and the human torso ending in acanthus leaves u both ruskin in his "stones of venice" and moore in his "character of renaissance architecture" inveigh against the renaissance grotesques. ruskin calls them "ignoble"; each selects as evidence for his condemnation a single example, as if one could thus argue from the particular to the universal. the renaissance grotesques, it is true, lack the power and the symbolic significance of the medieval monsters; on the other hand many from such combinations with foliated scrolls the grotesques oftenest em- ployed were the cherub- head, the chimera or griffin, the winged lion- paw, the mascaron or grotesque mask, the sphinx (or rather the fore-part of a winged sphinx), especially on bases of candelabra, masks, were made its starting-points (figs. , , ). apart fig. .—grotesque, palazzo del mao- nifico, sienna. (fig. ; pi. iv., ). a history of ornament treatment of relief. in nearly all the early renaissance work the relief is handled with remarkable delicacy and charm of effect. certain details are carved in moderately high relief, with rounded masses producing emphatic spots of light and shadow, while the subordinate elements of the de- sign are kept low, and the minor details almost melt fig. .—flat relief ornament, santa maria dei miracoli, venice. away at the edges into the background. thus the de- sign shows its salient masses at a distance, and the lesser features come into view progressively as one comes nearer; while the contrasts of low and medium and high relief produce an effect of great elegance and refine- ment. all the early carving is small in scale, and there are no hard and sharp lines and undercut edges such as one sees in greek carving (figs. , , , , , , - , etc.). of them are of great beauty of outline and modeling as pure ornament, and it is purely as ornament that they generally appear. they are usually subordinate elements in a decorative scheme, not independent features existing for their own sakes, as in most medieval examples. there are poor grotesques in renaissance ornament, as there are inferior examples of any motive in any and every style. but in general the renaissance grotesques, "monsters" and mascarons fit admirably into the decorative scheme and possess intrinsic beauty of line and modeling. early renaissance in italy on the other hand, these same designers could pro- duce charming effects by the judicious use of flat low relief, in which the decorative pattern, preferably flat and without modeling, stood in the lowest possible relief against a finely-tooled background, as in figs. , , . the principle of "varied relief," as it is called, may have been in part derived from the study of roman fragments, though it is by no means universal even in the best roman carving. it is characteristic of the roman stucco-reliefs, but these were not known to the early renaissance carvers, and its general adoption by the italians is probably due in a measure, at least, to the fact that so many of them were trained to the gold- smith's art. such minuteness of detail and delicacy of relief are natural and characteristic in works in gold and silver. the purpose of the architects, carvers and goldsmiths in their handling of plastic ornament, both in composi- tion and detail, was to produce a decorative play of light and shade and a harmonious movement of line which by their richness in contrast with plainer surfaces should appeal to the esthetic emotions through the eye. as in greek ornament, this appeal was that of sensuous beauty rather than of symbolism or of any recondite significance; it was esthetic rather than intellectual, and should be judged accordingly. in frankly pur- suing this aim, the italians of the early renaissance sometimes overstepped the mark, at least in their minor works, losing the advantage of contrast by an excess of decoration on all parts of the object decorated. a history of ornament but even in these cases the beauty of the ornament itself and the refinement of its execution compel admiration. books recommended: as before, anderson, durm, gannand und rosenkranz, schutz.—also, consult list at end of chapter iii. m ruskin, in his "seven lamps of architecture" (chap. i, § is), declares that "ornament cannot be overcharged if it be good, and is always over- charged when it is bad." this is one of his characteristically misleading maxims, defensible only when special meanings are assigned to the adjec- tives "good," "bad" and "overcharged." it is absurd to contend that there can be no excess in the use of ornament that is good in itself when used in moderation. moreover ornament that is thin, scanty, meager, cannot be called "overcharged," however bad in itself. figure . fa ade of pazzi chapel, florence. figure . ceiling, sacristy or san spirito, florence. figure . window from casa caracci, bologna. chapter iii the early renaissance in italy, ii architecture and accessory arts the orders of architecture. so far we have been dealing with motives of general application, without reference to their occurrence in works of major or minor architecture or the allied arts. it remains to discuss briefly certain features of their use and application in these arts. the early renaissance made no sudden break with the architectural practices and traditions of the th century. not only was the italian gothic architecture full of reminiscences of ancient roman forms and ideas (see p. ), which the renaissance had only to take up and develop; the new renaissance architecture was also characterized by the persistence of many concep- tions and ideas of medieval origin. in both styles in italy there was a blending of antique and medieval elements, but in differing proportions; in the early renaissance the decorative features of roman art, freely varied, were applied to the traditional types of construction inherited from the trecento. many of these motives we have already discussed, but only brief allusion has been made to the use of the classic roman "orders." a history of ornament of the five roman "orders," the architects of the quattrocento, at least until about , used by prefer- ence only freely-modified versions of the corinthian (see p. ; pi. i, , ). a species of ionic appears occasionally, and capitals of the composite type also occur; but the important point to notice is that none of the orders was at first used with classical "correctness." in other words the roman models were not copied with exactness, but were taken as suggestions for design and varied with the utmost freedom. even the most cur- sory comparison of the columns and pilasters of the quattrocento with the roman prototypes must make evident the independence and originality of the renais- sance designers. particularly noteworthy is the fact that not a single colonnade was built in italy during the th century. the roman arcade—the character- istic roman combination of the open arcade with en- gaged columns carrying the entablature, as in the colosseum—did not come into general use before , and the few examples occurring before that date are experimental and exceptional. the earliest example of the engaged column on a palace facade is that of the vendramini palace at venice, dated or (figure ). ceilings. throughout the entire renaissance the italians bestowed particular care upon the decoration of their ceilings. while vaulting was still frequently used in churches and in court-arcades, the horizontal ceiling was generally preferred, especially in palaces and private early renaissance in italy, ii domestic architecture. it was of course constructed of wood or plaster upon a timber framework, and was almost always paneled or deeply coffered and enriched with carved rosettes, with sculptured heads or other de- vices, or more rarely with paintings. in all the earlier ceilings, and generally throughout the quattrocento, the paneling or coffering was upon the simplest possible geometric scheme. thus in the hall of the two hun- fio. .—ceiling detail, church at bironico. dred in the palazzo vecchio, and in the riccardi palace, both in florence, as also in the ceiling in fig. from the parish church at bironico, we have ceilings of uni- form square coffers; in fig. and figure the cofferings are also composed of squares; in the academy at venice and the reggio gonzaga at mantua they are in the form of circles with small "lozenges" between. in the corridor of the sacristy of san spirito at florence, the barrel-vault is paneled with circular coffers connected by intersecting bands; it is by andrea sansovino (figure ). the frames a history of ornament of the coffers in all these and other examples are profiled with enriched moldings; the centers of the panels are ornamented with rosettes or paintings; blue and gold predominate in the color scheme. the vaulting of the porch of the pazzi chapel at florence is in rosetted panels of della robbia ware (glazed and colored terra- fig. .— (a) ceiling of pazzi chapel, florence; ( ) ceiling of santa maria dei miracoli, venice. cotta; fig. a). the wooden barrel-vault-shaped ceiling of the miracoli church at venice has a rich and elaborate system of large shallow square panels with rounded corners, and smaller rectangles, with pictures in the larger panels, the whole decorated in color (fig. b). the simple and dignified square-paneled ceiling of sta. maria maggiore at rome gilded about with the first gold brought to italy from the new world (such at least,is the legend), is of course of early renaissance in italy, ii fio. .—ceiling, cortona cathedral. earlier date, but when it was built, and whether or not it reproduces an antique design, is apparently not cer- tainly known. in nearly all these ceilings the "beams"— fio. .—ceiling, santo spirito in sassia, rome. the soffits of the coffer-frames—were ornamented in relief, either with bands of leaves of oak or laurel or with running ornaments, and small rosettes were com- a history of ornament monly placed at their intersections. the tendency was towards over-decoration and loss of contrast between frame and panel. later, more elaborate geometric patterns came into vogue, as can be seen in figs. , ; but simple elements still predominated—octagons, circles, squares, rectangles, crosses and oblong hexagons. doorways, doors and windows. doorways with either arched or square-headed open- ings were framed in enriched moldings, usually flanked i ^ by pilasters and capped fio. .—frame of doorway, palazzo doria, genoa. by an entablature, a tri- angular pediment or a "florentine" pediment (see p. ); but they display the greatest va- riety of treatment, and cannot be reduced to a formula covered by any general description. engaged or detached columns, usually of the corinthianesque or composite type, sometimes took the place of pilasters. in some cases the doorway was enclosed by a richly molded and carved architrave crowned by a cornice or pediment, without pilasters (fig. ; figure ). in a few cases candelabrum- shafts take the place of columns. only in a few church fronts do we find the doorway preceded by a porch with free columns as in the certosa at pavia (figure ) and in sta. maria delle grazie at milan. early renaissance in italy, ii the doors themselves, if of wood, are usually square- paneled (fig. ); if of bronze, \hey are paneled and richly sculptured. ghiberti's second or east doors for fio. .—florentine door-panels. the baptistery at florence (figure ) are the most celebrated; they date from - or later. those by antonio filarete for the basilica of st. peter at rome ( ) are pre- served in the present st. peter's; those of pisa ca- thedral are almost equal- ly noted. figures , and illustrate a few among the endless va- rieties of the early re- naissance doorways. windows belong more properly to architecture than to ornament; but their decorative detail enters within our field. the early renaissance, however, seldom fio. .—arched window, urrino. a history of ornament lavished much ornament upon windows, except in lom- bardy and emilia. one example from urbino is shown in fig. ; one from bologna in figure ; the cele- brated lower windows from the certosa at pavia are illustrated in figure . the cathedral of como pos- brlr^^s!^ " tommaso rodari (about niches to contain statues were almost invariably capped with a fluted shell (fig. ). the origin of this feature in renaissance practice is not easy to determine. it is rarely if ever found in ancient roman architecture, except in baalbek and palmyra in syria, which were unknown to the italians of the th and th centuries. sesses nave windows of un- usual elegance of design by fig. .—niche and statue, tomr in fiaschi chapel, genoa cathedral. ). they are unusual in having flanking pilasters with arabesques surmount- ed by dwarf pilasters car- rying a delicately molded pediment. it was not un- til the transition that pilasters and columns came into general use to flank window openings and to carry a pediment above the opening. the windows of the ducal palace at ur- bino are exceptional in having entablatures above fluted pilasters. early renaissance in italy, ii balusters. the balustrade in the various forms with which we are familiar was an invention of the italian renaissance. roman antiquity knew nothing of the balustrade; in its place the romans had-only either the solid parapet or railings framed of intersecting bars of wood or bronze. the gothic architects of western europe employed miniature arcades or panels of open tracery fio. .—seven types of baluster. as parapets along the edges of church roofs or for stairways. the earliest renaissance balustrade is that which crowns the pitti palace at florence (fig. a); it is probably by brunelleschi, and consists of a row of colonnettes supporting the rail ( - ). who it was that first conceived the idea of the "double-vase" type of round baluster (fig. b, c, d), i do not know; it appears frequently in the latter part of the th century. it consists of two opposed vase or candelabrum-units connected by a scotia or two scotias and a torus or bead or by a bead alone; the top and bottom each resemble a rather thick doric capital a history of ornament (fig. &). sometimes the "vases" or candelabrum- stems are enriched with acanthus leaves on the belly, and the more slender part of the stem with flutings (fig. mc.d). the "single vase" type of baluster, the one most familiar to modern eyes (fig. e, f, g) was a creation of the middle renaissance, and probably first used by vignola ( - ). the disad- vantage of the double-vase type is its slenderness in proportion to its height. in order to secure a more robust support for a broad stone rail, vignola devised the form which from that time forward was increas- ingly employed, with a single vase- like body, set, in the earlier examples on a small pedestal, in the later ones on a low block or plinth. it has no prototype in classic architecture, and the various forms assigned to it in vignola's and other books of the "orders," respectively for the tus- can, doric, ionic, corinthian and composite orders are the purely in- dividual fancies of the authors. modern designers space these balusters more closely than did vignola, for example, around the fountain of the villa lante near viterbo, and with better decorative effect. later archi- tects found in the balustrade an effective crowning decoration for use above the cornices of church and fio. .—balustrade, la scala hospital, sienna. early renaissance in italy, ii palace facades—a practice initiated by brunelleschi in the pitti palace as has already been noted on page (fig. a). we have by no means exhausted the list of early renaissance ornament-motives of an architectural character; but those we have briefly reviewed cover the greater part of the decorative work of importance belonging to this period. minor architecture. while a distinctly architectural quality is observable in italian renaissance ornament generally, the italians were on the whole decorators rather than designers of construction. in their architecture, as already observed (pp. , ), they made of construction not the mistress but the servant of decorative effect, with the result that in some cases the sacrifice of structural expression was carried too far, and the design appears iu consequence superficial and lacking in substantial logic. in minor works, in which the decorative purpose is less likely to be hampered by structural questions, the italians were preeminently successful. tombs, pulpits, choir-stalls, shrines, altar-pieces they designed with a propriety, a mastery of decorative effect, a refinement of detail and a beauty of execution never surpassed in works of the same class elsewhere. the same genius for producing beauty of mass, line, surface and detail is seen in all their work in the accessory arts: in carving and inlaying of woodwork, in metalwork—mast-bases and candelabra of bronze, chests of silver, goldsmith's work of all kinds, gates and grilles of iron; in their embroideries, laces, a history of ornament brocades and velvets. they touched nothing in the equipments and appurtenances of life that they did not adorn. tombs. among the hundreds of beautiful early renaissance tombs in the italian churohes, the earliest and one of the most beautiful is that of ilaria del caretto in the cathedral of lucca, by giacopo della quercia, which dates from about . it is of the floor-tomb type, a sarcophagus after the roman fashion set upon the floor and bearing the recumbent efligy of the person buried in the tomb (figure ). in the beautiful tomb of bishop federigo benozzi in the church of san francesco di paola near florence, the tomb proper is set in a square niche or recess, bordered by an exquisite colored terra-cotta frame of flowers and fruit. it is one of luca della robbia's masterpieces (figure ). the most frequently occurring type is the wall-tomb, in which the sarcophagus, with or without the sculptured recumbent figure of the deceased, is set on a pedestal within an arched or rectangular niche flanked by pilasters or columns carrying an entablature, or sur- mounted by either a classic or a florentine pediment (figures , ). all the resources of carving and sculpture in marble and bronze, aided by inlays and panels of colored marble or of della robbia terra-cotta (figure ), were lavished upon these tombs. the variety of detailed treatment of this general type is endless, and the number of notable examples far too early renaissance in italy, ii great to permit of even a summary mention. as ex- amples, however, of the general type one may cite the salutati monument in the cathedral at fiesole, by mino da fiesole; the bruni monument by rossellini in santa croce at florence—the earliest of this type, dated (figure ); the splendid marsuppini tomb (detail in fig. ) in santa croce by desiderio da settignano, a superbly executed but somewhat over- ornate example of later date, badly imitated in the tartagni tomb in san domenico at bologna; a number of fine tombs in churches at naples chiefly by giovanni da nola, others in the frari and santi giovanni e paolo at venice; several at rome, especially an early example in sta. maria del popolo, and in the sacristy of that church two very elaborate and imposing tombs by andrea sansovino, in the style of the transition to the middle renaissance ( ; figure ). two beautiful floor-tombs also deserve mention: that of ilaria del caretto already referred to, and the much later and richer, but hardly more beautiful tomb of pius ii in st. peter's at rome. in a category by itself is the transitional tomb of gian galeazzo visconti in the certosa at pavia, a two-storied canopied structure of great magnificence begun in by romano and briosco but not completed until . while the sculpture and the ornamental details are admirable, the lack of restraint and of contrast in its composition renders it less satisfying than the simpler earlier works of the same class. another type is seen in the beautiful tomb of piero di medici (figure ) set in a bronze- grilled arch in the old sacristy of san lorenzo at a history of ornament florence, the work of andrea verrocchio in (see also fig. ). pulpits and music balconies. among the many beautiful pulpits of the early renaissance two are especially worthy of mention and of study. the first is that by benedetto da majano built against a pillar of the nave of santa croce, florence, a masterpiece both of composition and of decorative detail. the design of the supporting corbel and of the radiating brackets or cantilevers that support the octagonal body is in every way admirable, and the appropriateness and beauty of every detail of the orna- ment, exquisitely carved in white marble, justly elicit one's admiration (figures , ). the other example is the outdoor pulpit at one corner of the cathedral of prato, designed by michelozzo, with sculptures by donatello, a charming work of the very early renais- sance ( - ). two balconies for singers originally intended for the cathedral of florence, but now preserved in the museo del duomo, are by donatello and luca della robbia respectively; they have already been alluded to (p. , figure ). in these the sculptured panels of singing and dancing children are the most important features. the architectural details and ornament of the balcony by della robbia are superior to those by donatello ( - ). a later music-balcony in the sistine chapel shows highly ornate balusters of the "double-vase" type. similarly ornate balusters decorate the rich marble stairway added in by bernardino di giacomo to early renaissance in italy, ii niccolo pisano's gothic pulpit in the cathedral of sienna. sedilia and choir-stalls. the decorative skill of the early renaissance artists of italy was nowhere more brilliantly displayed than in the choir-stalls of churches and sedilia of officials in town-halls and public offices. they lavished upon these a wealth of artistic effort and a disregard of labor which render absurd ruskin's charge that the artists of the re- naissance were "un- happy" in their work. enthusiasm and lov- ing care appear in every detail in hun- dreds of examples of this minor architec- ture. the high back or screen was divided by pilasters or colonnettes into narrow bays for the seats; above, an overhanging cornice or entablature was richly sculptured; the spaces between the pilasters were carved in low relief or inlaid with marquetry (intarsia); the arm-rests were boldly carved, and the lower seats of the front rows were made to carry out the decorative scheme of the higher seats behind. in such works a fio. .—acanthus correl, stalls in palazzo del comune, pistoria. a history of ornament greater freedom of treatment and a richer and minuter decoration were permissible than in more formal and monumental architectural works. the carving of this woodwork is technically almost faultless, generally dis- playing the most perfect finish, but remarkably vigorous and bold in details that suggest strong support, as in the fine bracket-acan- thus from sedilia in the palazzo del comune at pistoia (fig. ). the details of these stalls and sedilia are too varied and complex to be here described or discussed, and we cannot here even list the more important ex- amples. a few details are shown in pi. iii, , , . shrines, fonts, altar-pieces, etc. the numoer of these in the churches of italy and in european museums is extraordinary. there are also in american and private collections a considerable number of original works of this class, while casts of many others are to be found in our museums of the first or second rank. most of the examples that date from the fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries are of great fig. .—shrine, hospital of san francesco, gurrio. early renaissance in italy, ii beauty, whether adorned with figure sculpture or only with conventional or symbolic ornament. shrines for the sacred oil or for the consecrated elements of the fio. .—holy water font, pisa fio. —holy water font ry cathldral. ant. federighi, sienna cathe- dral. mass were often set in the wall and adorned with miniature pilasters and pediments and with sculptured angels, cherub-heads, and the like (figs. , ). the number of such works—altar-pieces, shrines, lunettes a history of ornament over church doors, etc., by the della robbias is as ex- traordinary as their beauty (figures , ). others in terra-cotta and in marble by donatello, mino da fiesole and benedetto da majano abound in italian churches and in public and private museums on both sides of the atlantic. holy-water stoups and baptismal fonts were commonly supported on a stem somewhat like a baluster or massive, short can- delabrum-shaft (see ante, p. , as in figs. , and fig- ure ). one of the richest of these is that in the cathedral of sienna, attributed to antonio fede- righi (about ); it is' supported on a carved pillar sur- f, . ts.-dktai^^lklan, fu.oe. slekna rounde(j {om fig. ures, and is adorned with every device of christianized roman symbolism (fig. ). the finest of all baptismal fonts is that in the undercroft or baptistery of the same cathedral, shown in figure . it is the work of giacopo della quercia, and dates from - . altar-pieces or pre- delhis were of marble, della robbia ware (figure ), or carved and gilded wood. they consist of a picture or relief set in a framework of architectural mem- bers. early renaissance in italy, ii marble inlay; intarsia. the art of mosaic passed into partial eclipse with the middle ages, to be revived only in the later years of the th century. inlaying generally took its place, especially for floor pavements. the most important and splendid of these, the floor of the nave of sienna cathedral, be- longs in large measure to the early th century, though a part was of earlier date. a detail from the later portion is shown in fig. . it is by beccafumi ( - ), and in spite of its late date the lightness and grace of its design are in the full spirit of the quattrocento. an important branch of the art of the quattrocento was the decoration of all kinds of wood- work by the inlaying of decora- tive patterns, sometimes of pic- tures, in light woods on a darker wood, or the reverse. this art, called intarsia, was practised by a guild of artists or artisans called tarsiatori, many of whose members rose to fame as architects and decorators. the inlaid patterns comprised all sorts of architectural motives and classic ornament details, especially the acanthus, anthe- mion and rinceau, together with foliage, festoons and floral and fruit forms executed in woods of two or three tones (pi. iii, , , ; figs. , ). in the fig. .—detail op in- tarsia >y b. da majano in palazzo vecchio, florence. a history of ornament scoff ale or clothes-presses in the sacristy of sta. maria delle grazie at milan, the painter bernardino luini was employed to paint ornaments of the same character fio. .—detail of intarsia on harpsichord in bariuni collection. as those of intarsia, but these remain an almost unique example of this exceptional treatment. furniture. the furniture of the early renaissance was compara- tively limited in range of variety, but its variety in- creased as time went on. cassoni or chests, benches, tables and chairs, with four-post beds set on a platform, constituted the entire equipment of a palace. not until the middle renaissance did the italians make use of sideboards and elaborate cabinets with drawers and doors, while sofas, couches and upholstered furniture generally, did not come into use until the th century, and were then quite generally imitated from french models. the cassoni, commonly called marriage-chests, were long enough to hold a dress without folding. the early renaissance in italy, ii earlier examples were of simple rectangular form with molded lid, corners adorned with colonnettes or pilasters, and the panels of front and ends painted with pictures on gesso (tempera painting on a kind of hard thin stucco), or directly on the wood. by the end of the th century carving in relief had generally displaced painting on these chests (fig. ; pi . iii, ). each province developed its own style of design, recogniz- able by experts though not always obvious to the ordi- nary student. benches were often merely chests with a high back and arms, of stately design in the finest examples. chairs were few, and it was in venice that they were made of richest patterns; but with all their carving and gilding they were hardly comfortable according to modern standards; and broad and easy fauteuils with arms and upholstered seats and backs were not in use until a very late date. tables were solid and heavy objects of one or two principal types: round or polygonal on a central sup- port, and oblong on two heavy carved end-supports connected by a bar at the bottom. four-legged tables were rare, at least until foreign fashions invaded italy in the th century. when they occur in genuine early italian work the legs are usually massive supports, turned, with swelling vase-like or baluster forms, and almost invariably connected by cross-bars near the bot- tom, making a perfectly rigid construction of the whole. all this furniture was richly carved, and being intended to "stay put," was far heavier than most of our modern movable furniture. the further development of furniture design, and a history of ornament the general subjects of ceramics and textiles are re- served for a later chapter. accessory arts. all forms of the minor and industrial arts were practised and developed with enthusiasm throughout the whole duration of the renaissance. decorative beauty was sought in every craft, in every department of human design and production. the modern separa- tion between design and production was not dreamed of; the artist both designed and executed, and so highly developed was the decorative taste of the artists of the early renaissance and so broad their training in the fundamentals of artistic invention that they could turn their hands equally well to work in widely different fields and materials. their versatility was astonishing. goldsmiths became sculptors; sculptors and painters designed great buildings; architects executed mural paintings; wood-inlayers designed tombs and altar- pieces, and brocades were woven from patterns by great masters. thanks to this phenomenal versatility all the allied and minor or industrial arts of the early as well as of the middle renaissance display a unity of spirit and a distinction of style which make their products precious acquisitions for museums and collectors, and unsurpassed models for the study and inspiration of modern designers. the furniture, woodwork and intarsia of the early renaissance have already been briefly discussed, and the metal-work in bronze mentioned incidentally in speaking of the tomb of piero di medici (p. ). early renaissance in italy, ii among the most famous masterpieces of the bronze founder's art in this period are the three magnificent mast-bases in front of st. mark's at venice, one of which is shown in pi. iv, . they are the work of alessandro leopardo, and date from about . very fig. .—oriental motives from ceramics and textiles (above), and three details from italian textiles (below). beautiful grilles were produced in both bronze and iron, and candelabra and ecclesiastical vessels in gold and silver and bronze of great elegance of outline and delicacy of detail (pi. iv, , . ). the great age of work in metal was, however, yet to come in the follow- ing period. to that period also belongs the chief de- velopment of the art of the ceramist, although the art of glazed and enameled pottery had its beginnings a history of ornament about the middle of the th century. this branch of decorative art will therefore be reserved for later dis- cussion (see pp. - ). textile art is the most important topic still remain- ing to be noticed. both weaving and the various forms of needlework were actively and brilliantly developed fig. .—two textile motives framed in a mesh. during this period. especially worthy of note are the figured fabrics which it produced, particularly the vel- vets and brocades. the most interesting factor in the development of their design was the great expansion of commerce with the east. genoa and venice had long maintained close commercial relations with the byzantine empire, and the venetians had even cap- tured constantinople in and held it for fifty-nine years. the great tower built by the genoese colony in that city in the th century is still a dominant early renaissance in italy, ii feature in its silhouette. by way of constantinople italy received not only byzantine silks and embroid- eries but also the products of the persian looms and potteries, and even to some extent chinese and indian fabrics and other wares. the oriental influence also entered italy from spain, and sicily had long before the th century learned from the arabs and moors the art of making encaustic tiles and of weaving rugs and wall-hangings with oriental patterns. it is not therefore surprising that nearly all the patterns of the th-century brocades and vel- vets betray their oriental inspi- ration (figs. , ). even be- fore the th century the italian — especially the venetian — painters had been accustomed to dress the madonna in robes fig- ured with oriental patterns (fig. a, c). the entire system of all-over pattern- ing of the early renaissance fabrics is based on oriental, chiefly persian, precedents. the majority of these fabrics were diapered with floral units enclosed in the meshes of a quarry system (figs. , d). the pat- tern in fig. from the madonna's robe in a painting by crivelli in the national gallery in london, is ex- ceptional in owing nothing to oriental suggestion. the flower motive in these patterns may be simple or com- plex, but it always recalls persian prototypes, as may a history of ornament be seen by comparing them with the patterns in fig. . the network of the quarry may be generated by the contact of decorative framing-lines surrounding each flower, or may form an independent system into fio. .—fol'r textile motives: (a) florentine, fifteenth century: ( ) blue and white wool on linen; (e) pattern from painting ry guido da sienna; (d) venetian velvet. which the flowers are set (figs. , ; pi. v). pow- dered or spangled patterns are also of frequent oc- currence, the flower motives being distributed over the surface without an enclosing mesh ( a, b, c). the fabrics were usually two-toned, the pattern in one early renaissance in italy, ii color appearing on a background of another color, or, as in the case of velvets, of another tone of the same color. three tones sometimes occur, produced by the contrasts of the long pile, a short pile, and a background sheared close. the weaving of multi- colored brocades was a later development, but combina- tions of cotton or linen with wool were not unknown, producing patterns in ^ two colors. needlework was an important branch of tex- tile art, employed gener- ally where minute and complicated detail in va- ried colors was desired, as in church vestments, costumes of state and the like. while the western church never rivaled the oriental in the gorgeou^ness of its vestments, and while on the whole those of the renaissance may have been less magnificent than the finest medieval examples, there was much splen- dor at least in the copes, chasubles, stoles and miters of the higher clergy and bishops. the beautiful patterns on these, worked in brilliant colors and silver and gold thread with the needle, show a mixture qf details derived from architecture and from manuscript illuminations; but it was not till the th century that these were developed to their fullest perfection (see fig. ). the beginnings of the art of lace-making belong to fio. .—north italian needlework. a history of ornament this period, though this art also was chiefly developed in the th century. its earliest form consisted of the filling-up of decorative embroidered openings cut in fine linen, with ornamental net-patterns worked with the needle. the natural tendency was to multiply and enlarge the openings to form richer openwork patterns and at the same time to elab- orate the filling-patterns. bobbin lace, worked on a pillow with a multitude of threads on small bobbins, was a still later development. fig. .—three lace patterns. fig. .—venetian punta-in-aria. the technic of the art in its final phases is too compli- cated to be set forth in a work of this kind; the am- bitious student is referred to the article on the subject in the "encyclopaedia britannica" and to special technical books on lace (figs. , ). typographical ornament also had its beginnings in this period, the invention of printing with movable types having occurred in . for some time the decorative initials of chapters in printed books were still inserted early renaissance in italy, ii fio. —two fif- teenth-century initials. by hand and illuminated, in some cases, in color. the engraving and casting of typographical ornaments developed slowly, and while many of the finest examples belong to the middle renais- sance and will be referred to later, dec- orative initials of great beauty were produced between and , es- pecially in venice, where radoldt, pan- nartz, sweinheim, renner and other germans were active after , and where aldus manutius established his celebrated press as early as (figs. , ). manuscript-illumination was by no means at once displaced by the invention of printing. some of the most splendid ex- amples of this art belong to the th cen- tury, and even to the second half, the art having greatly profited by the ad- vance in painting. french and flemish masters rivaled the italian, and the pic- torial miniatures were often of extraor- dinary beauty. architectural forms and classic details were increasingly em- ployed in the decorations, initials and borders, and suggestions were borrowed from other arts, especially that of jew- elry. the two examples nos. and in plate v are from a ms. by capella fio. .—typo- graphic orna- ment, venice, . a history of ornament in the bibliotheque nationale at paris, illuminated by the florentine attavanti. no. is also a florentine th-century example; no. is of the beginning of the th century, to which belongs also the "book of hours" of arragon, from which nos. and are taken. books recommended: as before, anderson, galland und rosenkranz, schutz. —also: j. baum : baukunst und dekorative plastik der renais- sance in italien (hoffmann, stuttgart, ).—l. beltrami: la certosa di pavia (hoepli, milan, ).—a. f. butsch: die biicherornamentik der renaissance (hirth, leipzig, ). —e. calzini: urbino e suoi monumenti (cappelli, rocca san casciano, ).—g. s. davies: the sculptured tombs of the fifteenth century in rome (murray, london, ).—g. and f. durelli: la certosa di pavia (civelli, milan, ).—j. durm: die baukunst der renaissance in italien (gebhardt, leipzig, ).—geymuller und stegman: die architektur der renaissance in toscana (briickmann, munich, - ). —w. griggs: portfolio of italian and sicilian art (griggs, london, ).—a. guerinet: la renaissance italienne, recueil d'ornements, etc. (guerinet, paris, ).—j. kinross: details from- italian buildings (waterson, edinburgh, ). —c. laspeyres: die bauwerke der renaissance in umbrieii (ernst & korn, berlin, ).—c. magenta: la certosa di pavia (bocca, milan, ).—a. marquand: luca della robbia (univ. press, princeton, ).—m. meurer: italien- ische flachornamente der renaissance (wittwer, stuttgart, ).—montigny et famin: architecture toscane (didot, paris, n. d.).—g. morandi: uarte della decorazione italiana (moretti, milan, ).—h. j. nicolai: das ornament der itauenischen kunst des xv jahrhunderts (bleyl, dresden, ).—g. j. oakeshott: detail and ornament of the italian renaissance (batsford, london, ).—paoletti: l'archi- tettwra e la scultura del rinascimento in venezia (.ongania, ven- ice, ).—t. g. paravicini: die renaissance-architektur der lombardei (gilbers, dresden, n. d.).—m. reymond: let early renaissance in italy, ii delia robbia (alinari, florence, ).—e. stegmann: orna- mente der renaissance aus it alien (voigt, weimar, ).—v. teirich: ornamente aus der bluthezeit italienischer renais- sance (intarsien) (holder, vienna, ).—thomas and fallon: northern italian details (amer. architect co., new york, ).—tosi and becchio: altars, tabernacles and tombs (giroux, lagny, n. d.).—a. t. tuckerman: details from the italian renaissance (comstock, new york, ).— s. vacher: fifteenth century italian ornament (textiles) (quaritch, london, ). ill chapter iv the middle renaissance general character. the dawn of the th century witnessed the begin- nings of a change in taste which was to transform the whole character of italian art. this change was in some respects a retrogression; in others, and on the whole, a notable advance. architecture and the decorative arts lost something of their naivete, of their early exuberance, of their minuteness and delicacy of detail; something also of their spontaneity. they gained, on the other hand, in breadth and stateliness of scale and composition, in variety and mastery of technic, in a certain expression of knowledge and power. three factors are especially noteworthy in this development. the first is the progress and wider diffu- sion of learning, stimulated by the development of printing. the classic authors were studied, commented and printed; classic art and culture were better under- stood; the architectural remains of antiquity were care- fully measured and drawn, and the principles of roman architecture were analyzed and discussed. alberti's "de re aedificatoria"—the first modern book on architecture—had been printed in ; it may be called the modern vitruvius, and like its ancient prototype the middle renaissance it assumed to set forth the ideal proportions of the orders. architecture became more scholarly and began to emerge as the work of men who made it their life- profession, wholly distinct from painting, intarsia, gold- smith's work and all the other allied arts; a subject of book-knowledge as well as of artistic inspiration; it was the dominant decorative art. the second factor was the phenomenal progress of painting. from an art of restricted purpose and range employed chiefly for religious instruction and the decoration of churches it became a universal art, no longer based on medieval traditions, but drawing in- spiration from the study of nature and the desire to represent objects and scenes and persons in as close an approach to realism as possible. the study of anatomy, the working out of the laws of perspective, and the discovery and development of oil-painting were power- ful influences in the advance of the art, which became the most important and magnificent element in interior decoration. the third factor was the emergence of an extra- ordinary galaxy of architects and decorative designers, all men of learning and of distinguished talent, some of them men of ^cal genius. bramante, peruzzi, the elder and younger antonio di san gallo, the two sansovini, sammicheli, galeazzo alessi, serlio, vig- nola, palladio and michelangelo among the architects— the last-named equally great as sculptor and decorative painter—; raphael and his three pupils giulio romano, giovanni da udine and perino del vaga among a host of lesser decorators; the universal genius lionardo da a history of ornament vinci; the immortal venetians titian, tintoretto and paolo veronese; benvenuto cellini the sculptor and goldsmith, with others only less noted than these, gave to the middle renaissance a luster which entitles it to be called the golden age of the italian renaissance. to these three factors should be added the steadily increasing wealth and magnificence of the roman pontificate. the popes, with their nephews and the other princes of the church became the richest patrons of the arts, not alone in the building of st. peter's and other great churches, but also in the erection and decora- tion of splendid palaces, villas and fountains, and in the accumulation of rich collections of antiquities of art. the center of art activity was thus transferred from florence to rome, where the influence of the classic ruins and of the collections of roman antiquities stimu- lated the increasing classicism in all the arts of design. while painting was the art which in this period de- veloped most rapidly and reached the highest perfec- tion, architecture still remained the mistress art, taking painting into its service and employing it in a new style of mural and ceiling decoration of extraordinary nobility and beauty. in this decoration, which derived much of its inspiration from remains of ancient roman work, chiefly through the influence of raphael and his pupils, relief-ornament molded free-hand in stucco was combined with painting of ornaments of a fanciful character in arabesques of marvelous delicacy and charm (pi. ii). along with this decoration of walls, vaults and ceilings there went a corresponding change in architectural forms and in carving both of wood and the middle renaissance stone. the orders, whether as columns or pilasters, the framework and dressings of windows and doorways, the arcades of churches and courtyards, were all treated with closer conformity to antique precedent, with greater severity as to ornament, with greater dignity of scale, with more vigor of relief, than in the preced- ing period. this more stately and more scholarly architectural spirit dominated all the decorative arts. furniture, both fixed and movable, was conceived on architectural lines; intarsia gave place to carving in relief; tombs, whether more or less ornate than those of the quattrocento, were more imposing architecturally. metalwork, ceramics, laces, tapestry and all forms of textile work alike underwent the stimulating effect -of this new development of taste and were designed and executed with astonishing fertility of invention and perfection of technic. it was an age of increasing re- finement and elegance of life and manners; of greater luxury and display; an age of increasing materialism but also of increasing intellectual inquiry, as in the opposed tendencies of protestantism and jesuitism. it was during this brilliant period that the renaissance in art spread to france, spain and germany, the netherlands and england, although it had been fore- shadowed in france and spain by sporadic works in the later years of the fifteenth century. the orders of architecture. the early renaissance designers, as we have seen, made little effort to combine and proportion their columns, pilasters and entablatures according to the a history of ornament canons of antique roman practice or the rules of vitruvius. it was the middle renaissance that de- veloped these canons into definite formulas which varied as to details, but were all based on the general propor- tions of the vitruvian canon and measurements of extant roman examples (see pp. , ). five orders fro. .—four orders of architecture. were recognized: the tuscan, doric (in two forms, one having mutules, the other dentils under the corona), ionic, corinthian and composite. fig. presents the first four of these in elevation (the middle portion of the shaft being omitted) : the composite is omitted, as its proportions are identical with those of the corinthian. in this figure d represents the lower diameter of the shaft. it will be observed that (a), the total heights of the columns in the four orders are respectively , , the middle renaissance uuujuuuuij c and diameters; (b), the height of each entablature is one-quarter of the height of the column; (c), the three divisions of the entablature—architrave, frieze and cornice — measure in height respectively %d for the tus- can; % and %d for the doric; % and %d (approximately) for the ionic, and %d, %d and d for the corin- thian and composite; and (d), the base is in height in all cases. the cinquecento archi- tects gradually aban- doned the corinthian- esque capital and other free variations common in the quattrocento, and used with increasing con- formity to roman prece- dents the doric, ionic (fig. ) and corinthian orders, and sometimes the composite; the tus- can very rarely. the tuscan shaft was never fluted; the doric rarely; the other orders were often, though not invariably, fluted; never when of polished marble, granite or porphyry. the fluting and inlaying of polished shafts was an fio. .—iovic order, palazzo pietro massimi, rome. a history of ornament innovation of the baroque period, as in della porta's interior of sta. annunziata at genoa. the orders as decoration. during the quattrocento the orders, as we have seen, were used as wall-decorations both for exterior facades and for tombs, pulpits and minor architecture generally. the rucellai palace at florence ( ) was the earliest example of a facade divided into bays by superposed pilasters (figure ), and the vendramini palace at venice ( ) the first in which engaged columns took the place of pilasters, and in which the columns were coupled for greater solidity and richness of effect (figure ). alberti had used engaged columns on the facade of san francesco at rimini, and pilasters on that of san andrea at mantua. brunelleschi had em- ployed pilasters internally in the pazzi chapel, in the aisles of his two churches at florence, san spirito and san lorenzo, and in the interior also of the badia fiesolana. while the propriety of using pilasters as features of wall-decoration has been questioned and even denied by purist critics, their serviceableness and beauty as decorations have been generally conceded, as they serve both to divide the wall into bays or panels, and to provide for the satisfaction of the eye a visible system of vertical supports for the horizontal lines of the entablature (pi. i, - ). the artists of the cin- quecento certainly felt no scruples of the artistic con- science against using not only pilasters, but engaged columns as well, to divide and decorate both external and internal walls. while it is by no means true that the middle renaissance architecture now became merely a matter of design with the orders, it is true that these were now used with greater freedom and variety of application than at any previous time. they were employed singly and coupled, with and without pedestals, often in combina- tion with arches after the roman fashion, as in fig. a, fio. .—column ar arcades: (a) palazzo pompei, verona; ( ) basilica, vicenza. especially in church interiors and courtyard arcades, sometimes in the combination called the "palladian arch," in which the arch springs from the entablature of a smaller order set between the rather widely spaced columns of the main order, as in the exterior arcaded galleries added by palladio to the basilica at vicenza the propriety of the roman combination of arch and order has been denied by some purists. a brief discussion of this question will be found in my "hist, of orn.," i, p. . a history of ornament (fig. b). palladio was not, however, the inventor of this combination; the first to use it was giacopo sansovino, in his magnificent facades of the libreria san marco (or reale) at venice, in , over twenty years earlier than the date of the vicenza arcade. in venice, verona and vicenza the orders were used with es- pecial richness and variety of design on facades of palaces and churches. towards the end of the period the "co- lossal order" came into use —the column or pilaster run- ning through two stories and carrying an entablature, which, being proportioned to the columns, was thus made large enough to crown the facade adequately (pi. i, ). this avoided the di- lemma of the superposed or- ders, the upper entablature of which is either too heavy for the upper order which carries it, or too small in scale to crown the whole facade. in this decorative use of the orders the architects were led to a careful study of scale, of the proportioning of all spaces, voids and solids and features of the design, and of the profiling of the various moldings and belt- courses for artistic effect. the result is seen even in compositions without columns, for many of the roman fio. .—window, pandoi.fini palace, florence. figure . detail, facade of palazzo rucellai, florence. figure . detail, facade of palazzo vendramini, venice. the middle renaissance facades are astylar. the proportions of stories, the spacing, size and shapes of the openings, were studied with the greatest care, producing an artistic rhythm and harmony of effect which owe nothing to carving or other ornament than the moldings, belt-courses, dressings of doors and windows and cornices of the facade. a wholly new use of the orders as decoration came in when they were applied as architectural frames for windows, as in the bartolini and pandolfini palaces at florence by baccio d'agnolo and raphael respectively (fig. ); later in the two upper stories of the farnese palace at rome (about - ), and quite generally thereafter. meanwhile the candelabrum-shaft, the carved or arabesqued column and the florentine pedi- ment (see ante,, p. ) disappeared from architecture, both because they had no classic warrant and because they did not fit in with the more sober and monumental aspect of the architecture of the time. moldings. there was less variety in the moldings of the middle renaissance than in those of the quattrocento, but a closer adherence to antique models. the egg-and-dart, the water-leaf, the bead-and-reel and the vertical fluting of the corona were the chief and almost the only mold- ing-ornaments in use by the cinquecento architects. all these typical moldings are shown in the entablature of fig. . the profiles of the cyma recta, cyma reversa, ovolo, bead and fillet and combinations of them were 'baccio d'agnolo baglioni of florence, - ; raffaele santi d'urbino, - . a history of ornament mmmm. lid uriah credence roman table: conformed to the ancient practice and studied with the greatest care as to their proportioning and grouping. in this careful study peruzzi attained the highest suc- cess, with antonio da san gallo the younger, giacopo sansovino and vignola following him closely in reputa- tion for the refinement and beauty of their details. in furniture and woodwork the va- riety both of profile and ornamentation of moldings was much greater, as be- fitted the material and the objects de- signed. especially important was the ™« "thumb molding," a convex profile adorned with carved fiutings or "thumbs," usually con- vex themselves but sometimes concave; this type of molding was chiefly used for chest-covers, table-edges, shelves and the like (fig. ). narrow fillets and un- dercutting also occur frequently in the profiling of the woodwork, rarely in architecture. rustication. a few of the earlier facades of this period have the basement story rusticated (cancelleria palace, rome, - ; massimi palace, ab. - ; pompei palace, verona, pi. i, ), but for the most part rusti- cation was restricted to the portals (farnese palace, fio. .—typical "thumr-moldings" furniture. the middle renaissance ), and to "chains" or vertical strips, and quoins or "long-and-short" work at the corners (bartolini and larderel palaces, florence). oc- casionally, however, even columns were rusticated, as in some of sammichele's city gates at ve- rona (pi. i, ) and the rear fa- cade of the pitti palace at flor- ence by ammanati (about ). sansovino in the zecca or mint at venice and palladio in the val- marano palace at vicenza intro- duced an unhappy innovation in columns having the alternate drums square instead of round, an ugly and wholly indefensible device. interior decoration: stucco and fresco. the discovery by morto da feltro in of the perfectly- preserved stucco decorations of the piers and vaults of the baths of titus and golden house of nero on the esquiline hill—or rather of the combined sub- structions of these two buildings—attracted the atten- tion of raphael, ever alert and eager for fresh sug- 'giacopo tatti sansovino, pupil of the sculptor andrea sansovino, h - . fio. —painted rin- ceau, loooie op the vatican. a history of ornament gestion and inspiration. in the unrivaled loggie (arcades) of the court of san damaso of the vatican he, with the aid of his pupils giulio romano * and giovanni da udine, applied the results of his own study viua mapama fio. .—stucco-relief, loggie of the vatican. fio. .—stucco - relief, villa madama. of these remains to the decoration of the piers and arches of the arcades, with triumphant success. the exuberant fancy and decorative richness of his ara- besques, modeled in low relief and painted in bright colors (figs. , ; also pi. ii, - ), have been justly admired, in spite of certain discrepancies of scale * giulio pippi romano, - ; giovanni ricamatori da udine, - . the middle renaissance in some of the details. his two pupils, more or less under his direction or with his aid, executed decora- tions in stucco in the same general style in the two loggias of the farnesina villa or palazzetto at rome, in the villa madama just outside the city (fig. ) and in the palazzo del te at mantua. from this time on (all the above works are dated between and ) stucco modeled in relief and painted became a resource of increasing popularity, not merely for interiors but even for exteriors in works of the less monumental sort, like villas and garden structures. later there set in an abuse of this easily-worked material, of which we shall take note in the chapter on the baroque style (pp. - ). plate ii illustrates details from this period, from the vatican loggie and stanze, and the pal. del te and ducal palace, mantua. painting, as already remarked, was the most bril- liantly developed of all the arts in italy during this period. as applied to the decoration of walls and ceilings, it combined purely pictorial decoration with a lavish use of conventional ornament. for the most part, especially in rome and generally outside of venice, the medium employed was fresco. true fresco or "buon fresco" is a difficult process, in which a slightly thickened water pigment is applied to wet or damp plaster. this necessitates executing a completely- finished portion of the entire design on a limited area of plaster, which must be freshly applied for each day's work; but the result is permanent. the purely conven- tional ornament was freely varied from, though based upon, the roman prototypes found in the baths of a history of ornament titus. it employed arabesques of the most varied character with grotesques of human and animal forms mingled with exuberant fancy and composed with con- summate skill and with unfailing grace of line and movement. raphael was the first great master of this art, but was followed by a host of capable artists throughout central italy and some parts of north italy. while decorative painting, as such, apart from its use of conventional ornament, lies outside the scope of this work, brief mention must be made of the extraordinary richness, beauty and abundance of the applications of pictorial art to the decoration of walls and ceilings, espe- cially in rome and florence, and later in venice. the sistine chapel, the "camere" and "stanze" of the vatican, the farnesina, and many other palaces and churches, are adorned on walls, vaults and domes, with allegorical, historical, scriptural and mythological paint- ings, each a masterpiece by an artist of consummate skill or by his pupils under his direction. early ex- amples of painted ceilings are illustrated in figures and , from sienna and perugia. the frames, borders and accessories of these pictures are generally admirable examples of the classic inspiration in ornament. of this, the culminating phase of decorative painting, the ceiling of the sistine chapel of the vatican, michel- angelo's masterpiece, is without dispute the supreme example. it was executed by the master's unaided hand between and . it is so purely a work of decorative painting that its relation to the history of michelangelo (or michelagnolo) buonarotti simone, - . the middle renaissance ornament is less important than that of many less notable works, except in one respect in which its in- fluence on later decorators was perhaps deleterious. the architectural divisions and ornaments which frame the mighty symbolisms of the design were painted in chiaroscuro? in a sort of false perspective as if to de- ceive the eye into the impression of actual relief (figure ). this was done with consummate skill; but it started michelangelo's followers on a false path, which resulted in the following period in much un- fortunate striving after theatrical and sensational effects. in venice oil-painting was developed as a means of both mural and ceiling decoration by the artists already named on p. and others, with a brilliancy and har- mony of resulting color effects unapproached elsewhere. pictures, often of great size, were executed on canvas and applied to walls and ceilings within frames of carved and gilded wood of great splendor, as in the doge's palace, the scuola di san rocco and many churches. sgraffito. during this period decoration in "sgraffito," originat- ing in the preceding century, was applied with increas- ing skill to the exteriors of palaces and even of more modest private houses. by this process a thin coat of fine white plaster spread over a ground-coat of dark brown plaster, is scraped away according to a more or 'chiaroscwo—"light and dark"; the technical name for monochrome painting which represents the lights, shades and shadows and modeling of relief by gradations of a single color of gray or brown. a history of ornament less elaborate pattern, uncovering the dark ground-coat to form either a decorative design in brown against the prevailing white of the wall, or the reverse. it is a species of etching on a monumental scale, whose only drawback is the necessity, even in the italian climate, of renewing the decoration from time to time, though fio. .—kxampi.es of florentine sgraffito decoration. at long intervals. in many cases—as in those from florence shown in figs. b and —the white was scraped away from the background, leaving the pattern in white against the brown of the wall. this kind of decoration seems to have fallen into disuse by the middle of the century. it is a charming and effective embellish- ment for stuccoed buildings, not unduly expensive to execute, and there seems to be no good reason why it figure . ceiling, palace at caprarola. figure . stucco detail. villa mamma, rome. figure . stucco detail, court of palazzo vecchio, florence. the middle renaissance should not be revived and used to-day in regions where the climate is dry and frosts unknown or rare. ceilings. four kinds of ceilings claim attention in this period: flat ceilings of wood or plaster; coved ceilings with fig. .—two ceilings from farnese palace. penetrations; vaulted ceilings (barrel vaults, groined vaults and cloistered vaults); and domes. flat ceilings were paneled or coffered; no longer, as a rule, with simple geometric forms like the square, octagon and circle as in the preceding period, but with a history of ornament more complex and varied forms, such as combinations of rectangles, crosses, t-forms and their derivatives, forming a definite pattern for the whole ceiling, usually about a large central panel (see ante, figs. , ; also figs. , ). the entire ceiling was treated as a single decorative composition, as in the two examples from the farnese palace in fig. , and in the later develop- ments of this system of treatment it will be seen that all suggestion of structural design was abandoned fig. .—half-plan of a church ceiling in venice. (figure ). this was in a sense more honest than the former practice of uniform geometric coffering, which simulated—like the greek stone cofferings of pteroma ceilings—a non-existent construction of inter- secting wooden beams. all these ceilings, executed sometimes in wood, sometimes—and perhaps more frequently—in plaster, were now frankly what they had always really been, decorative coverings to hide the joists of the floor above, or the trusses of the roof. many of the medieval basilicas of rome and some of the newer churches there and elsewhere were adorned the middle renaissance with such ceilings, usually of geometric design; while in venice in the doge's palace, the ceilings of the collegio, of the scrutinio and of the maggior consiglio were treated as compositions of elaborately carved picture-frames for the paintings of veronese, palma giovane and tintoretto. a frequent detail of these ceilings, as also of mirror-frames and decorative escutcheons of this period in general, is the use of voluted "curl-overs" (fig. ), the effect of which is fig. .—"curl-over" detail, ceiling of sala del senato, doge's palace, venice. often excellent, but the origin of which it is difficult or impossible to trace (see also p. ). coved ceilings were the most distinctive type of this period; the central portion flat or nearly so, surrounded by a large coving of quadrant section above the main cornice. this coving was usually penetrated by trans- verse vault-compartments enclosing semicircular tym- pana or lunettes in the plane of the wall, or the tops of open arches. these varied surfaces provided scope for every sort of decoration in relief and color; paintings in the lunettes, on the triangular vault-penetrations, and a history of ornament in the spandrels of the coving between them, as well as on the flat central ceiling-space (figures , ). it would take a volume to describe the various forms of ornament employed on these ceilings, or to enumerate fully even the more notable examples of them. we can only mention among the earlier examples: the ceiling of the piccolomini library attached to the cathedral at sienna, chiefly by pinturricchio, with paintings framed in wreaths of flowers and fruit; the ceiling of the beautiful sala del cambio at perugia by perugino; that of the loggia of the farnesina at rome by raphael and his pupils (about ), already men- tioned on p. . all these belong to the earlier stages of the middle renaissance. the vatican abounds in fine coved ceilings of the full middle renaissance, and others are to be found in nearly all the greater palaces of rome, florence, genoa and naples. many of those in the pitti palace at florence belong, however, to the baroque period and will be mentioned later. vaulted ceilings. these, whether groined or barrel-vaulted, whether of brick or stone construction or of lath-and-plaster, were ornamented generally in one of two ways: by paneling or by painting. of the first of these treatments the most important example is the nave-vault of st. peter's at rome; the earlier portion by michelangelo dates from about ; the later portion by maderna, from about . both are alike in general style, but differ slightly in detailed pattern. they are both composed pietro vanucci, called ii perugino, - . the middle renaissance of simple rectangular and cruciform units, and are rich and dignified in effect. a beautiful early example is that of the hall of the palazzo del te at mantua by giulio romano, of great refinement of treatment and excellent effect. very elaborate but less pleasing is the ceiling of the sala regia in the vatican, attributed to antonio da san gallo the younger (figure ). in all the ceilings of this class the gilding of the enriched moldings is relied on for much of the decorative effect, although color is applied to certain parts. sometimes the panels frame pictures instead of mere ornament. the finest example of this combination and one of the noblest ceilings in the world is that of the camera della segnatura in the vatican, in which the admirably de- signed decoration of panels and relief ornament frames four circular and four rectangular pictures, supple- menting the symbolism of the superb mural paintings on the walls. the entire decoration of this room is by raphael and his assistants. of the second system of vault-decoration, that by painting alone or by painting chiefly, the most impor- tant example, in some respects the grandest painted decoration ever executed, is michelangelo's masterpiece on the barrel-vaulted ceiling of the sistine chapel in the vatican, already described on pp. , . other ex- amples, mostly of much later date, abound in the vati- can, and in the palaces and churches of rome, naples and other cities; but they belong rather to the history of painting than that of ornament. more purely orna- mental are the charming decorations by raphael and his assistants in the square domes or cloistered vaults over a history of ornament each bay of the vatican loggie. the purely ornamental as opposed to pictorial painting of vaulted ceilings from this time through the century and well into the baroque period tended to develop the suggestions drawn from the roman examples referred to on page with the use of arabesques and grotesques handled often with charming grace and fancy: e.g., the groined vaults of the lateran court arcades, the ceilings of the hall of maps and of the library of the vatican, and ceilings in numerous villas, as for example in that of pope julius iii at rome, the circular court arcade at caprarola (about ), and parts of the vaulted ceiling of the villa madama at (near) rome. domes were the special contribution of the italian renaissance to church architecture. many of the early domes were left undecorated, except by ribs converging to the opening of the lantern at the top. in the middle renaissance they were more generally painted, often without architectural subdivisions; but the success of these efforts was far less than was attained in other fields of decoration. doubtless the greatest failure of all was the painting in the great octagonal dome of the cathedral of florence by giorgio vasari. some domes of this period are paneled or coffered. that of st. peter's, the finest of all, is decorated with pictures in mosaic framed in panels which form appropriate divi- sions of the vast surface. it was the work of giacomo della porta, vignola's gifted pupil and successor ( - ). "giorgio vasari of arezzo, - ; painter, architect and author of "the lives of the artists." the middle renaissance stucco decoration. the use of stucco, stimulated by the triumphant suc- cess of raphael's revival of roman methods and adap- tation of roman models, as already explained, was very rapidly extended and applied to exteriors as well as to interiors. the most noted and thorough-going example of pure stucco relief independent of painted ornament is the entrance-hall or "loggia" of the villa madama. pada palate.rome fig. .—stucco-kelief, facade of spada palace, home. this villa, whose plan is attributed to raphael, was never completed, but the "loggia" and some of the ad- jacent portions were finished after his death, and deco- rated with relief-ornaments in stucco by giulio romano and giovanni da udine, who had worked with raphael on the loggia of the farnesina and the loggie of the vatican. these stuccature of the villa madama are of great delicacy and wonderful variety and fertility of invention, and have been the objects of study by a history of ornament many generations of decorators, who have never been able to surpass them (fig. ). later, stucco-relief was used externally, especially on villas, as on the villa pia in the vatican gardens and the villa medici (about - ), and even on palace facades, as on both the street and the court facades of the spada palace at rome (fig. ). the roman climate is not unkind to this rather perishable form of decoration. in the fol- lowing period the use of stucco degenerated into abuse. even in this middle period the fatal facility of the material and the growing tendency towards sensational novelty of effect—bravura as the italians call it—led to its use in a sculptural fashion for which the material was ill suited. this misuse was especially common in church interiors; it seems to have begun in the last quarter of the th century. the stucco decorations in the church of the gesu at rome, built by vignola and della porta in - are, however, by a baroque artist of the th century. villas and gardens. the wealth and splendor of the papal court in this period gave rise to an extraordinary activity in the building of villas, not only in and near rome (tivoli, frascati, castel gandolfo, etc.) but also in and near florence, como, genoa, verona, the italian lakes and other places. in these villas and the superb terraced gardens in which they were set, the princes of the church and their relatives created a new style of archi- tectural and landscape design, dominated not by the formal stateliness of the classic palace, but by a spirit the middle renaissance of levity, of free fancy, of the desire for present enjoy- ment and esthetic relaxation. in the casino or house, in the minor buildings like belvederes, grottoes and loggias, in the balustrades and stairways, and above all in the ever-present water-architecture of cascades and fountains, the decorative fancy of the architect and sculptor found absolutely free expression. the use of stucco was carried to the limit of its possibilities; sculp- ture of gods and goddesses, nymphs and tritons, fauns and satyrs and dolphins was omnipresent, executed in stucco, stone, marble, lead and bronze; and mosaics and colored marble lent their added brilliancy to the decora- tions of hemicycles, grottoes and loggias. the orna- ment-forms used were those of classic roman art, freely varied, except the balustrades, which, as has been shown, were a purely renaissance invention (see p. and fig. ). the "single vase" type of baluster, invented by vignola, appears first in the central fountain of the beautiful villa lante at bagnaia near viterbo, dating from about , and soon after in the court of the villa- palace of caprarola, about . the game or sheath- figure, which he introduced in the lower court of the villa of pope julius iii a little later (fig. b), from this time on found increasing favor as a fanciful substi- tute for the pilaster and as an isolated stele or decorative pillar in gardens (fig. c). the fountain basins are often of extremely graceful form in this villa-decoration (figures , ). the design of fountains became, in- deed, almost a distinct branch of decorative art, develop- ing types which have served ever since as classic models in this field. a history of ornament woodwork and furniture. the perfected technical skill and the assured facility of the handling of decorative detail as well as of com- position, space-filling and relief in this period are well exemplified in its woodwork. an early example is the fig. .—lower half of door in vatican palace. series of carved panels in the stalls of the church of san pietro in casinense at perugia, attributed to raphael; the stalls in the choir of the cathedral of sienna are also famous, but no more beautiful than the stalls of scores of other churches and public buildings in italy (figures - ). the wooden doors of the camera della segna- tura in the vatican, the carved shutters of its great win- dows, and other doors opening from the loggie are of the middle renaissance about the same date as the perugiarr- stalls, but of more monumental design (fig. ). the very simple door- way and doors of the pietro massimi palace by peruzzi (fig. ), despite the lack of carving, are a model of exquisite proportion and refined detail. they are of about the same date as the vatican doors. carved furniture was both richer and fig. .—doorway and door, palazzo pietro massimi, rome. fig. .— itaijan ren- aissance bed- post. more varied than in the quattrocento. tables were more generally used (figure ) ; chests were heavier and more elaborately carved and in higher relief (pi. iii, ); armchairs came into use (pi. iii, ) and a history of ornament were sometimes upholstered in leather; and cabinets, credences and elaborate writing-desks were produced of extraordinary richness in carving and paneling, with figure-sculpture, gaines and other sculptural ornaments of great elegance of design (figure ). painting and fio. .—italian renaissance footroard. intarsia disappear almost entirely as decorations of fur- niture. the bedsteads of this period were of the four- post type, with carved posts, head-board and foot-board; often with carved side-pieces as well (figs. , ). mirrors were a venetian specialty, but the florentines excelled in the carving of frames for both mirrors and pictures (fig. ). innovations. by the middle of the century the severity of classical precedent began to be relaxed, and a new spirit of deco- rative fancy made its appearance in minor details both of architecture and furniture, especially the latter. the gaine or sheath-figure became the favorite form for vertical supports in woodwork (fig. a), and in the gardens at caprarola a row of gaines were set up to decorate the parapet of a terrace in place of the more classic canephorje (human figures crowned with bas- kets; fig. c). another detail of increasing fre- quency of occurrence was the spiral volute, which was figure . detail, stalls of san pietro casinense, perugia. figure . panel, stalls in san severino, naples. the middle renaissance introduced at every possible point, as in the sgabellone or pedestal in fig. , in which it occurs twenty times. fio. .—florentine mirror-frame. a third new feature, which was destined to become more important architecturally and decoratively than any other innovation of the time, was the cartouche or •the precise origin of this name as well as of the thing itself is a sub- ject of some controversy. derived etymologically from carta = paper, the word may have crept into decorative terminology either through the prac- tice of decorating or heading cartels (challenges) and important papers with the arms or escutcheon of the sender, or through the decorative quality of the great seals affixed to state documents, bearing the arms, crest or portrait of the monarch or prince, often with ribbons with which to tie the paper or parchment when rolled up. a history of ornament fio. .—three gaines: from a florentine carinet; from villa papa gidlio, rome; canephora, caprarola gardens. fio. .—florentine soa- bellone. decorative escutcheon, consisting of a medallion or shield, usually oval, set in a rich frame of com- plex outline, adorned with "curli- cues" and volutes, curious notch- ings and curled-over or square- ended tabs. the "curlicue" or voluted projection was probably suggested by the curling over of the ends or fig. . — escutcheon with montefeltro arms. the middle renaissance edges of rolled-up documents; the curious tabs may- symbolize or recall the ends of ribbons attached to seals or used in tying up the roll. as employed in cartouches these details are purely fantastic and conventional dec- orations (see details in fig. ; pi. iii, , ). ar- morial bearings of the first half of the th century, carved in marble as architectural decorations, seldom or never show these innovations: e.g., the montefeltro arms from urbino shown in fig. . metalwork. one of the greatest of all metalworkers of the renais- sance was benvenuto cellini, whose life practically spanned the middle renaissance, as he was born in and died in . his versatility was extraordinary; he was equally at home in the modeling of medals or golden salt-cellars and in the casting of colossal bronze statues. a consummate goldsmith and sculptor, a great roysterer and braggart, he was the incarnation of one aspect of the middle renaissance: its frequent combina- tion of artistic preeminence with utter lack of moral principle. he illustrated the creative versatility of the period which produced michelangelo, giovanni da bologna, benedetto da rovezzano, lionardo da vinci, vignola, palladio, the san galli, the post-raphaelesque stuccatori, and the giants of the venetian school. his works belong, however, rather in the domain of sculp- ture than of pure ornament, and many of them were executed in france. his most famous extant work, perseus slaying medusa, is in the loggia dei lanzi at florence, and its pedestal (figure ) is an admirable a history of ornament example of his decorative skill and of the amazing facil- ity and bravura of his design and execution. an important branch of this middle renaissance metalwork was the making of armor, in which kings, nobles and condottieri alike loved to display their splen- dor and the armorers their artistry and technical skill. casques, corselets and greaves were covered with deli- cate arabesques, repoussees in low relief or engraved and chased, combined with figure subjects of a mytho- logical or symbolic character in higher relief. the most celebrated product of this art was the suit of armor made for henry ii of france ( - ), but others nearly equal to it abound in the museums of italy, france, germany, austria and the united states. figure shows two examples in the riggs collection in the metropolitan museum at new york. in other departments the metalworkers produced equally notable works, ranging from those of gold- smiths and silversmiths, like the famous silver casket in the naples museum set with reliefs in rock-crystal, candlesticks of silver or of bronze (see ante, fig. , and pi. iv, ), and bronze door-knockers modeled with consummate sculptural art (pi. iv, ), to magnificent fountains of bronze in which sculpture and ornament are superbly combined, as in that of the villa lante at bagnaia, or the fountain by giovanni da bologna in the villa petraia at florence. even small objects bike "repousse = executed by hammering and blunt-punching from the back or reverse side, or sometimes by hammering and punching down the back- ground on the display-side. "giovanni (da) bologna called fiammingo (the fleming), born in flan- ders in ., died in italy. figure 'qjnomtmcr&knceji)kn tian table and mirror. j ^ qn(a the middle renaissance keys, vase-handles and drawer-pulls were treated as works of high art (pi. iv, , , , ). window- grilles and lamp-brackets of wrought-iron were also produced in great numbers (fig. ; pi. iv, , ); fio. .—iron lioht-bracket, citta di castello. and every branch of the bronze-founder's and iron- worker's arts displayed the prevalence of high decora- tive skill and excellent taste. other arts; ceramics. until the th century the art of pottery in italy was almost entirely confined to the coarser kinds of domestic earthenware, for which the clays of tuscany and the marches furnished abundant material. a few examples of enameled tiles from the th and th cen- turies show that there was some slight knowledge of fusible mineral colors, but it was not generally applied for purposes of decoration. it was not till after the a history of ornament middle of the th century that there was any system- atic production of majolica—that is, of earthenware glazed and decorated with fusible enamels. the name "majolica" is presumably derived from majorca, an island in the balearic group from which there was ap- parently a sufficiently important exportation of enam- fio. .—plate with portrait from vienna museum. eled pottery of this kind to have given its name to it. there is no evidence that potters from that island ever taught their art to the italians; but these in the course of time appear to have worked out for themselves the processes necessary for imitating the imported product. the principal factor in this development was the dis- covery of the secret of making opaque glazes with fusible earths containing salts of tin or lead, and it is the middle renaissance not known who first in italy discovered this secret. the discovery has been attributed to luca della robbia of florence, and its earliest application was made by him in the beautiful ceramic frame around the tomb of federigo, bishop of fiesole (figure ). whether or not he was the very first, he was certainly one of the earliest to use a stanniferous white glaze, with which he embellished and protected the terra-cotta reliefs which fio. .—border pattern from plate, florence or urrino. he, and after him andrea and other nephews, modeled for lunettes, altar-pieces and decorative medallions (figures , ). to this white glaze he added a blue glaze, chiefly for background to his exquisite groups in relief, and also occasionally, and in small quantities, green and yellow. luca was a sculptor, not primarily a ceramist; his decorative sculptures have been referred to on pp. , . his nephew andrea and andrea's five sons continued the production of decorative works of the same general character well into the th century; their works show greater elaboration of detail and a a history of ornament wider range of color than those of luca. among the hundreds of della robbia works in churches in italy and in museums throughout the world, one may men- tion the infant medallions on the foundling hospital at florence, the charming little lavabo in the sacristy of san spirito, both at florence; the frieze of the seven works of mercy on the ospedale del ceppo at pistoia, and a fine altar-piece in the metropolitan museum at new york. all these are, however, rather works of decorative sculpture than of ceramics, pure and simple. the pro- duction of decorated pottery, of plates, bowls, vases, ewers and druggists' vessels began only in the later years of the th century. nearly all the examples in the museums (there are of them in the louvre) date from after . by that date, however, the art and industry were firmly established in twenty or thirty towns, mostly in northern italy; of these the most im- portant were faenza in the marches (whence the word faience), caffagiolo, florence and sienna in tuscany, the middle renaissance deruta in the former papal states, and castel du- rante, gubbio, pesaro and urbino in the duchy of urbino. while the expert can generally distinguish between the products of these various potteries, it is impossible to specify their distinguishing characteristics in a man- fio. .—urrino plate in germanic museum, vienna. ner to make them easily recognizable by the general student. they possess certain common characteristics, such as an opaque creamy glaze and a predominance of blue and yellow in the color scheme. the great major- ity of the open ware—plates, platters, bowls and basins —is decorated in the center with pictorial subjects taken about equally from classic mythology, ancient history and scripture, copied for the most part from engravings a history of ornament of paintings, and often altered by the ceramist, not always wisely; sometimes with portraits as in fig. . the borders we're decorated with motives in like manner drawn from architecture and painted ornament, such as anthemions, rinceaux and the like (figs. , ), or from any other source that offered suggestions. the craftsmen who produced these wares were artisans, not great artists, and they did not always observe the law of fitness in adapting the borrowed motives to the form of the object decorated. besides the lighter blue and the yellow—which varies from light yellow through orange almost to brown—there was employed some- times a deep blue which gives great richness and dignity to the design. figs. - and pi. v, , , - illustrate a few of the varieties of decorative treatment with anthemions, scrolls, grotesques, portrait or fancy heads, and armorial bearings. textiles. the textile arts shared in the growing taste of the renaissance for artistic elegance and splendor. tapes- tries were woven from the designs of great masters, e.g. those in the vatican from cartoons by raphael. italian masters designed cartoons for the tapissiers of flanders (see chapter ix); mantegna and giulio romano both sent designs to brussels, and those of mantegna are particularly noted for the rich ornamental details of costumes, furniture and buildings in the historical com- positions which were his specialty. from the point of view of ornament the tapestries of this time are, how- ever, chiefly interesting for their borders, which borrow the middle renaissance their motives mainly from architecture, often suggest- ing frames in relief (fig. ). the laces, the church vestments, the velvets and fio. .—two details, top and fig. .—chasurle, sixteenth border op tapestry by raphael century, stubois collection. in vatican. stateliness of effect naturally brought about (pi. v, , , - ; fig. ). in the art of stained glass, as in that of tapestry de- sign, one observes the dominant influence of the paint- ers. these had raised pictorial representation to the a history of ornament highest perfection it had ever attained, and the glass- designers, like the tapestry-designers, lost sight of or deliberately ignored the special qualities and limita- tions of their material in the effort to produce trans- parent pictures with all the shadings and gradations of an oil- painting, rather than to develop to the ut- m o s t the brilliance and glow of which' glass is capable. even when the window was treated in a more purely decorative manner the details were handled as in a painting (fig. ). the color-scheme was generally sober, with ornamental motives or pictures set on a white ground, and the great decorative possibilities of the leading were singularly neglected. the less pictorial the design, the better is their decorative effect, and many of the windows of the middle renaissance possess charm in the harmony of their color-tones and the judicious balance of their composition. but they lack the depth and glow of the best medieval glass of western fio. .—an italian renaissance window. the middle renaissance europe, the architectural magnificence and decora- tive dignity of the great gothic windows of france, england and germany. even in the churches these italian windows have little of the religious or didactic character; they are ornamented windows, nothing more in most cases. although they sometimes display trans- parent paintings of religious subjects, they are more often designed with a few religious emblems mingled with conventional details of escutcheons, festoons, scrolls and the like, of a purely secular and even pagan character, and with architectural forms to frame and hold them together. it must, however, be remembered that in italy windows were generally small and far apart, of far less decorative importance than in north- ern and western europe, and generally quite subordi- nate to the rich interior color-decorations of painted walls and ceilings. books recommended: as before, durm, geymuller, kinross, montigny,paoletti, schutz, stegmann, thomas and fallon.—also: anony- mous: ornati del coro di san pietro casvnense (rome, n. d.).— bates and guild: ornament of the italian renaissance (guild co., boston, ).—w. bode: italian renaissance furniture, tr. by herrick (helburn, n. y., ).—cam- porese: loggie di raffaele nel vaticano (rome, n. d.).—a. colasanti: volte e soffiti italiane (arch. b'k. pub. co., new york, n. d.).—h. d. ererlein: interiors, fireplaces and furniture of the italian renaissance (arch. b'k pub. co., new york, ).—g. ferrari: lo stucco nell'arte italiana (hoepli, milan, n. d.).—m. p. gautier : les plus beaux edifices de genes (didot, paris, .)—w. h. l. gruner-.fresco decorations and stuccoes in italy etc. (murray, london, ).—g. l. hunter: italian furniture and interiors (hel- a history of ornament burn, new york, ).—p. letarouilly: edifices de rome moderne (gilbers, paris, ); le vatican et la basilique de st. pierre (morel, paris, ).—w. odom: a history of italian furniture, xiv-xtx century (doubleday, new york, ).—a. palladio: / quattro libri di architet- tura (franceschi, venice, ); also english translation (ward, london, ).—reinhardt: palast-architektur genuas (wasmuth, berlin, ).—w. f. schottmuller: furniture and interior decoration of italian renaissance (brentano, new york, ).—h. strack: die baudenkmàler roms des xv-xix jahrhundert (wasmuth, berlin, ).— i. triggs: the art of garden design in italy (longmans, london, ). a history of ornament example—of this restless striving after a novel and in- dividual expression (figure ). preeminently a sculptor, he designed in light-and-shade, modulating and breaking his surfaces to gain lines and spots of shadow. a colossus himself, both artistically and in- tellectually, he loved colossal orders, big details, and a certain restlessness and movement of lines and surfaces. his successors and imitators reproduced and exagger- ated his eccentricities and extravagances without his genius. they developed in time an architecture whose external composition and details, often ingenious and effective, are too frequently coarse and heavy, suggest- ing a labored striving after novelty rather than an easy mastery of effects and means. there seems to be a constant effort to surprise the spectator rather than to charm him; an appearance of ostentation in strong con- trast to the delicately-adjusted proportions and refined details of the works of a bramante, a peruzzi, or a vignola. the leaders in this tendency were carlo maderna, francesco borromini, and the great sculp- tor-architect lorenzo bernini. all three were men of decided ability, bernini distinctly the greatest of them. the time-limits of this period cannot be exactly de- fined, for architecture of a restrained and classic or middle renaissance character continued to appear well into the th century, while a reaction towards a se- verely classic treatment manifested itself before the end of the same century. in general use the entire seicento is considered as baroque in its decorative art; but the 'carlo maderna, - ; francesco borromini, - ; lorenzo bernini, - . italian baroque ornament name "baroque" or "baroco" is applicable rather to a quality than to any definite period of years. the word baroque itself is of italian origin, technically applied to pearls of unusual and irregular shape; hence to archi- tecture which defies the classical canons by singularities and unusual and surprising combinations and effects. the name "rococo" sometimes applied to works of baroque style is a misnomer, since it belongs more prop- erly to the interior decoration of the louis xv style and its german and italian imitations. the jesuit influence. the jesuit order, formally recognized and estab- lished by a papal bull in , grew so rapidly in wealth and power that before the end of the century it had become an important if not dominant factor in the prog- ress of church architecture. proceeding upon the prin- ciple that the masses should be attracted to the services of the church by any and every means that might most strongly appeal to their senses, the jesuits aimed to produce in their church interiors the utmost possible impression of decorative magnificence. colored marbles combined in violent contrasts, complicated architectural detail, sculpture of angels, cherubs and saints in striking and theatrical attitudes, painted perspectives, abundant gilding and every device that could amaze the beholder were employed lavishly to produce sensational effects of splendor. stucco was freely used for sculpture to replace the more costly marble, and for many of the architectural details, and "scagliola" (sham marble) was used in many places in imitation of the more costly a history of ornament varieties of colored and variegated marble, though these are not lacking in certain interiors, especially of chapels, and in tombs where the available funds per- mitted. since surprising effects were desired rather than the purer sorts of artistic excellence, the finer qualities of design tended to disappear, and the per- nicious influence of this theatrical art affected more or less all architectural design. architectural detail. effects of general composition belong to the field of architecture rather than of ornament, but the details of the architecture are properly part of our subject. the "orders," especially "colossal" orders extending through two or even three stories, were used with no essential change in their proportions or profiles, except that the "breaking" of the entablatures to produce multiplied planes and lines of shadow was carried to an extreme. in some instances, by setting the pedestals and capitals diagonally, especially to flank portals, the breaking-out of the entablature over them was made to produce novel and conspicuous effects of perspective and shadow. but while the pedestals, columns and entablatures were otherwise generally treated according to traditional rules, every sort of license was taken with both triangular and curved pediments. pediments were placed within pediments, the horizontal cornice of the pediment was broken back in the center or even cut away with the frieze and architrave below it, in order to receive the upper part of an arched door, niche or window. in other cases the apex of the pediment was italian baroque ornament broken back or cut away to admit a bust, vase or cartouche; curved pediments were likewise interrupted in the center, the two adjacent halves terminating in scrolls (fig. ). the earliest example of the pediment within a pedi- ment may be seen in della porta's facade ( ) to fio. .—top of gateway, villa falconieri, frascati. vignola's church of the gesu at rome. this fine church, the central church of the jesuit order, exercised a powerful influence on the later architecture of the order. its interior decorations in painted and gilded stucco do not, however, belong to the date of its erection; they were executed between and by antonio raggi and g. b. gaulli. the fashion of the scrolled curved half-pediment may have been set by michel- a history of ornament angelo's pedestals for the four reclining figures of his monuments to the medici in the new sacristy of san lorenzo at florence ( ); each pedestal being crowned with such a half-pediment. it is interesting to observe that the italians in many of these innovations on classic roman precedent were reproducing, without knowing it, combinations and de- tails employed years earlier by the syrians at baalbek (cf. my hist, of orn., i, p. , fig. ). as the italians of the seicento knew nothing of this syrian architecture, this example of identical recurrence is extremely interesting. nearly all the distinctive details of the baroque architecture can be traced to origins in works dating as far back as the period - . thus in the upper windows of the farnese palace, attributed to michel- angelo, the arches break through the horizontal entabla- tures into the tympana of the pediments. "colossal" pilasters were used by sammichele at verona, by pal- ladio at vicenza, by michelangelo on the facades of the palaces of the campidoglio at rome, and on a still more colossal scale in and on st. peter's at rome. other cinquecento germs of baroque details will be mentioned later. on the other hand, the baroque use of diagonally- placed pedestals and of entablatures broken out at degrees, the curving of facade wall-surfaces, and the hideous twisted columns of the baldacchino of st. peter's, were inventions of a later age, having no proto- types in the middle renaissance. italian baroque ornament twisted columns. a late roman twisted column of white marble, re puted to have been brought from the gate beautiful at jerusalem, where st. peter healed the lame man, is preserved in a chapel of st. peter's at rome. this richly-carved column, of a type which is essentially ugly and could only have been produced in an age of decline, was greatly admired by bernini, who copied it on a colossal scale in the huge baldacchino or altar-canopy of st. peter's, where its ugli- ness was magnified tenfold (figure ). from this time on the twisted column seems to have been accepted as a desirable bequest from classic art and christian his- tory, and was frequently employed for works of minor architecture, where it was, on the whole, less objectionable than in more monumental works (fig. ). the twisted column ("colonne torse") is not to be confounded with the spirally-fluted columns of the middle ages and early renaissance, which retain some rigidity of aspect and are generally used with dis- cretion. examples of the "colonne torse" abound; e.g. in a confessional at vercelli; in a fountain of the villa d'este at tivoli; on the sacristy cupboards of the church at macerata; in the flzeusgidrm fio. .— twisted col- umn, confes- sional in san andrea, ver- celli. 'cf. in the bible, acts iii, - . *cf. my "hist, of on.," i, figures , . a history of ornament chapel of the crucifix of monreale cathedral; in the altar of the annunciation of san ignazio at rome, this last dated as late as ; and many other instances could be given. in the same spirit of the quest of novel effects the architraves or framing-moldings of doors, windows and fio. .—voluted buttresses, santa maria della salute, venice. panels were complicated by multiplied crossettes, pro- jections, ears and tabs; rectangular brackets were treated like triglyphs, and gutta? were placed under all sorts of projections. consoles or inverted brackets, as well as brackets set upright (that is, with the large volute at the top), were designed with interrupted curves, as in the upper part of fig. . the huge and picturesque voluted console-buttresses of sta. maria della salute at venice (by baldassare longhena, ; c italian baroque ornament fig. ) are the most famous examples of this feature, which became the standard device for uniting the high central part of a church facade to the lower side-aisle fronts. rustication and carv- ing. rustication under- went a similar elabo- ration and experimen- tation in the search for variety and animation of effect. banded and rusticated columns had been used in a number of middle renaissance buildings .at verona (pi. i, , ), florence, venice and elsewhere. fig. shows an early baroque rusticated pi- laster, from frascati, with a rusticated arch; fig. the gate of the archiepiscopal seminary at milan; fig. a pilaster from caprarola; all illustrating the tendency to over-elaboration and the striving after ingenious novelties. vermiculations as in fig. , and in foun- tain-structures "congelations" or conventional repre- sentations of icicles or lime-deposits, symbolic of water, fio. .—gateway of seminary at milan. a history of ornament italian baroque ornament mm v&rmicolalwns c fio. .—"vermiculated" and "congelated" rustications. were among the common devices for producing a speckled play of light and shadow on masonry sur- faces. fio. .—three escutcheons from verona. shields, armorial escutcheons and cartouches were almost the only carved ornaments for exteriors to be a history of ornament added to the preceding list. in these, voluted forms and "curl-overs" were introduced wherever possible, especially in the elaborate papal escutcheons on church facades and ecclesiastical palaces. great ingenuity was shown in these compositions (figs. - ). palm branches as symbols of victory sometimes enter into fio. .—half-wreath and exteriors in favor of the larger, broader effects of the baroque facades. both the cartouche and the multiplication of volutes and of curl-overs occur frequently in the later middle renaissance, especially in furniture and other works of minor architecture and industrial art, as already ex- plained on p. . the florentine "sgabellone" of fig. is decorated with a cartouche of almost ba- roque character, and twenty volutes can be counted in various parts of the design. broken or "shouldered" curves appear both in the outer silhouette of this pedes- these designs, possibly a reflex influence from france, where they occur frequently under henry iv ( - ). the example in fig. , though of the th century, is thor- oughly in the baroque spirit. the carving of moldings was of little importance, and all the minuter and more deli- cate forms of carved ornament disappeared from the baroque palms, san giovanni la- terano, , ry galilei. heavier and bolder details re- quired by the larger scale and italian baroque ornament tal and in the cartouche, which may be compared with the baroque cartouche in fig. with the arms of pope urban viii, dated over years later. the curl-over scroll was a favor- ite device with the furniture-carvers of the second half of the th century. indeed, the cartouche with curl-overs occurs as early as in the stucco decoration of the vault of the scala d'oro in the ducal palace at venice, if the attribution of this work to ales- sandro vittoria is correct. the gaine. this feature, already referred to in the preceding chapter, became so impor- tant in the german, flemish and eng- lish renaissance as to deserve a para- graph to itself. its origin goes back to the ancient termini or boundary-posts set at the corners of fields. these were in primitive days wooden posts driven into the ground, the small end down, and the "butt" end above carved into a head of mercury, whose greek name, hermes, was frequently given to these posts. later they were imitated in stone, square instead of round in section and executed with high art, so that even in cicero's time greek hermes-posts were in demand for decorating roman villa gardens. the italians of the fio. .—gaine or sheath f i o v a e, sa- cristy of cer- tosa, pavia. a history of ornament renaissance revived the ancient custom and imitated the antique termini, elaborating them into such stately half-figure posts as those in the caprarola gardens shown in fig. c. it was perhaps from the furniture- makers that these garden decorators de- rived their suggestions for the use of half-figures emerging from a sheath. the architects of the seicento, ever in quest of new forms and combinations, seized on the gaine as a substitute for the pilaster in major works, finding it more decorative than the pilaster and capable of endless variety of treatment. figs. and , the latter from the villa albani at rome, are only two variant examples among a long list that might be cited: e.g. the tower of .san andrea delle fratte at rome ( by borromini); the madama palace, rome, where it is used to flank the win- dows; the doorway of the pallavicini palace, genoa; and a very early ex- ample by galeasso alessi on the muni- cipio or marina palace at milan, dat- ing from about . fio. .—gains from a gate- way or villa alrani, komi. interior decoration. while the exteriors of buildings were treated with a certain bigness of composition and scale and in a manner that demanded little of carved ornament, the italian baroque ornament interiors were often fairly riotous with showy decora- tion. columns, pilasters and panels were veneered with strongly veined and rich-colored marbles—black, brown, dark red, green and yellow, contrasting with capitals and moldings of white marble. above all, stucco was employed to an extent, and in ways, never dreamed of by raphael and his school. it was fio. .—one quarter op a stucco ceiling, palazzo mattei, rome. used for ceilings and for many architectural features, with an extraordinary profusion of rich details in panels, scrolls, enriched moldings, cartouches, gro- tesques and human figures (fig. ; figure ). the variety of these plaster ornaments is endless, and any effort to classify and enumerate them would be futile. an inartistic and indefensible abuse of the material is seen in frequent imitations of draperies, represented as held up over tombs, doors, canopies, etc., usually by infant figures, as in certain rooms in the vatican. a history of ornament sometimes a festooned bit of drapery takes the place of a "swag" of fruit or flowers, even as an ornament of an ionic capital. it would be hard to find any artistic justification for so absurd a detail. one is forced to the conclusion that true artistic invention declined as the pursuit of sheer novelty became more and more insistent. figure sculpture. a notable element in the baroque scheme of decora- tion is the important part played by the human figure, in churches and palaces alike. amorini or cupids, angels, genii and human grotesques, modeled with great technical skill and for the most part posed in sensational and acrobatic attitudes, were placed in every possible position, as if clinging to cornices, coasting down the archivolts of arches, peering over pediments, holding wreaths, shields or emblems, and adding to the restless- ness of the whole interior effect (interiors of st. peter's, of sta. maria della vittoria, of st. john lateran, all at rome; church of the scalzi at venice; church of the carmine and several others at naples; ceilings in the pitti palace, florence; several interiors in the vatican at rome, etc.; figures - ). but while much of this very theatrical sculpture is open to the severest condemnation, high praise cannot be withheld from the skillful and generally charming treatment of infant forms. they were modeled in gen- eral with singular sympathy and full appreciation both of infantile beauty and of decorative effect. even the colossal marble babes which hold the huge holy-water italian baroque ornament basins in the nave of st. peter's, though wrong in scale —for a gigantic babe is a contradiction of ideas and an artistic absurdity—are in themselves finely modeled, and on a smaller scale would be charming. villas, fountains and gates. the love of luxury and display found full and free expression in this age in the decoration of villa gardens, casini, grottoes, fountains and gate- ways. stucco, stone and bronze were molded into fantastic shapes, and a humorous grotesquery played its pranks in water-organs, trick-foun- tains and the adornment of garden- grottoes artificially created under the terraces. the gaine or sheath-figure appears frequently, as on the famous water-organ at tivoli, and later in the amusing hobble-skirted caryatides of the gate of the villa albani, a belated bit of baroque design of the late th century (fig. ). the gate of the archiepiscopal seminary at milan in fig. illustrates the use of rustication in a design which substitutes a polygonal for a curved arch to the gateway; such arches were not infrequent in the th century. balustrades. the simple and elegant forms of the baluster em- ployed by the early renaissance artists or developed by fig. iso.—balus- ter, cernetto palace, bi- tonto. a history of ornament vignola (see ante, p. and fig. ), no longer sufficed the restless innovators of the baroco. they varied the vignola types, cut them square instead of round, set them upside down, even alternated them upright and inverted (terrace of doria palace, rome), crowned them with ionic and corinthian caps, and oc- casionally substituted openwork parapets for balus- trades. fig. illustrates a square single-vase balus- ter of unusually elegant design. the classical reaction. no art based on eccentricity and sensationalism can long survive, and the inspiration of the quest for novelty must in time exhaust itself. such a quest is in itself an unmistakable sign of the decline of creative power, and to this the italian baroco was no exception. as the th century drew to its close, artistic production, both in architecture and in the allied arts began to diminish. the jesuit order could not forever continue growing richer and building more churches, and both the secular and the ecclesiastical nobility were at last well supplied with palaces and villas. the reaction towards classical simplicity appears first in bernini's time, in his colossal tuscan colonnades in front of st. peter's, which are totally destitute of ornament. in the th century this tendency became more pronounced and was marked by a deliberate effort to return to antique roman types, both in general composition and in decorative detail. in this century we meet the beginnings of classical archaeology as a distinct artistic and scientific pursuit. figure . ceiling, sala di giove, pitti palace, florence. figure . door, palazzo negrone, genoa. figure . stucco details, palazzo negrone, genoa. italian baroque ornament the discovery of pompeii in , the epoch-making rediscovery of greek architecture by stuart and revett in , wood and dawkins' exploration of palmyra and baalbek, and the marvelous engravings of roman antiquities by piranesi, directed the attention of de- signers to new sources of classic art. archaeological fio. .—wall decorated in classic revival or louis xvi style. correctness, the textual copying or close imitation of particular antique models, took in large measure the place of original invention and creative adaptation. meanwhile in palace and garden design there was a reflex influence from french art as exhibited in the palace of versailles, affecting both exterior and interior details, as for example in the palace, the decorations and the gardens of caserta near naples. the ornament of 'giovanni battista piranesi, - . a history of ornament this period is—so far as the exterior at least is con- cerned—for the most part dry, correct and uninspired. when, later in the century, interior decoration and furniture underwent the influence of the french louis quinze style, the italian rococo imitations of this style lacked the vivacity and spontaneity, and generally also the delicacy of the french originals. the facades of ua^^mwm^jr^^^m st' john lateran bv ^ s^ mr(ifa^^l galilei ( ), of santa ^jim maria maggiore by fer- dinando fuga ( ), of the trevi fountain by niccolo salvi ( ), all at rome; and of the palace of caserta al- ready mentioned, by vanvitelli ( ), are fair examples of this re- action: designs not with- out dignity but lacking in decorative interest. the further reaction to- wards simplicity and delicacy of detail which manifested itself in france in the style of louis xvi and in england in that of the adam broth- ers, found its reflection in many palace interiors in italy towards the close of the th century (fig. ). the way was being prepared for the various "revivals" of the nineteenth century. kig. .—italian brocatelle, seven- teenth centi-ry. italian baroque ornament fio. .—traditional motive, wool on cotton. blue minor arts: textiles, furniture, metalwork. there was no such no- ticeable change in style in the minor arts as in architecture in this pe- riod, but rather a grad- ual increase in splendor and variety of decora- tive treatment corre- sponding with the grow- ing love of display. all the textile arts were car- ried on with increasing elabora- tion of design. in church vest- ments, altar-cloths and robes of state one observes the departure further and further from the oriental types of motive which dominated the brocades and vel- vets of the preceding century. the oriental origin of these mo- tives is still traceable, but the elaboration of all motives gradu- ally transformed them from their original aspect. a comparison of the brocatelle pattern in fig. with even the most elaborate patterns of the th and th centuries reveals the greater complexity of detail in the later fio. . — wall-hanging, applioue and needle- a history of ornament example, though there is no change in the principle of the design. on the other hand the motive in fig. might have occurred in a th century fabric. there was a great increase in the use of applique, that is of patterns cut out of one material and applied upon an- other material of contrasting color. applique and em- broidery of great splendor were combined in patterns a predominantly architectural in derivation—rinceaux, vines, grotesques not unlike those used in architectural carving (fig. ). the art of lace- making was developed to high perfection in venice especially (fig. ); and tapestry- weaving continued to furnish opportunities for splendid combinations of pictorial and ornamental design, though these arts was passing to as will appear in a later fio. . — venetian lace, seventeenth century, in metropoi.itan museum, new york. in both flanders, preeminence france and chapter. it was in furniture that the baroque style asserted itself more than in any other of the allied arts, unless it were in metalwork. the architectural character necessarily belonging to the more important articles even of movable furniture, naturally brought them under the influence of the general movement of architectural style. this architectural character was especially marked in the high cabinets, imposing articles of furni- italian baroque ornament ture of a kind which had begun to come into use in the th century, but which did not reach its full develop- ment until the th. the wide or deep lower part con- tained drawers, sometimes concealed behind doors, and could serve as a desk; the upper part with its drawers and pigeon-holes was a useful receptacle for papers and accounts, as well as for jewels and other small objects. in those of this period there is much use of ivory and ebony for inlays and moldings, and even onyx, agate and fine marbles are sometimes found. the de- signs were strongly architectural; the upper part was flanked by pilasters, colonnettes or gaines and sur- mounted by a broken pediment, and even the smaller parts were framed within miniature columns and entab- latures and adorned with niches and other architectural features. the workmanship was admirable, even in those examples in which the decline of taste is most clearly evident. (figure .) with the increasing provision of cabinets, dressers and cupboards for the storing of many different kinds of household goods, the cassoni or chests of an earlier period lost their importance and ceased to be made, or at least to be made of decorative splendor. on the other hand the chair took on new importance and was made less as an article of ornament and more as one of use and comfort. chairs were provided with arms shaped with graceful curves and were given forms and propor- tions better adapted for comfort, and were sometimes upholstered, at first in leather, later with real cushions covered with brocades, velvet or tapestry. in these developments the germans, flemings and hollanders a history of ornament seem to have played an important part. it was they who taught the french furniture-makers of the reign of louis xiv ( - ). the style developed by the french out of this teaching —or rather the three styles of louis xiv, xv and xvi—in turn affected the work and fashions of the italian cabinet-makers and woodworkers in the second half of the th century and throughout the entire th century. the ironwork of this pe- riod calls for no special no- tice, except as the patterns used in grilles, window-guards and gates discarded the simpler forms of the middle renaissance and made use dkonzt kviilhc fio. .—venetian seventeenth- century bronze knocker. fio. .—half of a seventeenth-century plate. of more complicated curves and more intricate combi- nations (pi. iv, ). the same reversed, interrupted italian baroque ornament and broken curves that had come into use in the archi- tectural details of buildings appeared now not only in the ironwork but also in the silhouettes of candelabra, vases and other works of the gold- and-silversmith, jeweler and bronze-founder (fig. ; pi. iv, , ); in typographical ornament, in ceramic decoration (fig. ), and in the minor arts generally. books recommended: anonymous: deckenmalereien des ersten korridors der koniglichen galerie [the uffizi] zu florenz (wasmuth, berlin, ).—m. s. briggs: baroque architecture (unwin, london, ) .—a. charvet: reiche plafonds aus italienischen schldssern und paldste (claesen, berlin, n. d.).—gurlitt: geschichte des barockstiles in italien; also das barock und rokoko-ornament (ebner & seubert, stuttgart, ).—r. norton: bernini and other studies (macmillan, new york, ) .—c. ricci: baroque architecture and sculpture in italy (heinemann, london, ). chapter vi the renaissance in france, i character of the french renaissance. the italian renaissance was the natural and spon- taneous outgrowth of the forces that had been progres- sively molding the thought and life of the people for a century at least before the time of brunelleschi, dona- tello and della robbia. it spread to other countries partly as the result of changes in the ideas and senti- ments of their peoples, but more often by the contagious influence of the italian renaissance and its brilliant works, appearing in those countries as a foreign fashion rather than as a spontaneous and popular movement. to france it was brought by royal influence, and its early development was almost wholly due to three suc- cessive kings whose campaigns in italy had filled them with admiration for italian art. these were charles viii ( - ), louis xii ( - ), and fran- cis i ( - ), each of whom fought in italy in vindication of alleged dynastic claims to the throne of naples and the dukedom of milan; each of whom, at first victorious, was finally defeated, but each of whom on his return to france brought with him italian artists and sought in a new palace to reproduce something of the beauty and elegance of the foreign style: charles viii at amboise, louis xii at blois and francis i figure . tomr of cardinals of amroise, rouen. figure . tomr of louis xii, st. denis. renaissance in france, i at blois, fontainebleau and many other places. as mr. w. h. ward has happily phrased it in his "archi- tecture of the renaissance in france," "charles and his courtiers fell in love with italy, and when they brought her home with them, the renaissance was found in her train." from this time on the kings and their courts were the leaders in every movement in the arts of design, building palaces and churches which set the style for their time, and filling their palaces with furniture de- signed by artists of distinction which exercised a power- ful influence on all the decorative arts. hence the french are accustomed to designate the various phases of their renaissance art by the names of their kings, and they thus enumerate the styles of louis xii, francis i, henry ii, iii, and iv, louis xiii, xiv, xv and xvi, and finally that of the empire, that is of napo- leon bonaparte. these various styles might more properly be grouped somewhat as follows: (a) the transition, covering the reigns of charles viii and louis xii and extending into that of francis i, - ; (b) the valois period from to , covering the greater part of the reign of francis i (d. ), and those of henry ii ( - ), francis ii (to ), and charles ix (to ); (c) the bourbon period—a period of oscillation between classical and baroque tendencies, to about , covering the reigns of henry iii ( - ) and iv (to ) and the earlier years of that of louis xiii from to or thereabout; (d) the period of louis, - , cov- ering the reigns of louis xiii from to , louis xiv ( - ), louis xv ( - ) and a history of ornament louis xvi to the revolution in ; commonly sub- divided into the phases peculiar to each of these four reigns. the empire style belongs to the th century and will be discussed in chapter xiii. this multiplicity of styles and phases in the french renaissance is due to no fanciful and arbitrary classifi- cation; it reflects a fundamental and significant fact in the development of the art of that long period. this fact is the presence of two contrasted currents or tendencies, due perhaps to the composite make-up of the french people; two opposed tendencies which we may call the gallic and the latin; the first romantic, viva- cious, imaginative, impatient of rule and formula; the second classic, orderly, taking pleasure in the subjection of design to formal canons, to the demand of symmetry and monumental disposition. to the first we owe the vitality and originality of french art; to the second its restraint, its freedom from vulgarity and extravagance, its inherent good taste. throughout the renaissance the pendulum swung gradually now toward one, now toward the other end of its arc, except during the period when it oscillated uncertainly under the disturbing in- fluence of the italian baroque. unless we grasp the significance of these conflicting tendencies the variations of french style become utterly confusing and incom- prehensible. the transition: - . even before the reign of charles viii italian artists had found their way into france here and there, to execute minor works such as tombs, chapels, altars and renaissance in france, i the like, and it is highly probable that examples of the new taste in the accessory arts, in stuffs and embroider- ies, perhaps in typographical ornaments, had also been introduced. certain it is that a new enthusiasm for classical learning had begun to manifest itself at least as early as the reign of louis xi, revealing itself in the paintings of jean fouquet and the miniatures of etienne chevalier. the two counts of le maine, father and son, both known as charles of anjou, were en- lightened patrons of the arts, and about summoned luci- ano da laurana to le mans, where he later executed the tomb of the elder charles in the cathedral. he was employed by the son at marseilles, where he built the chapel of st. lazare, and at avignon, where, aided by tommaso of como, he executed a sculptured reredos in the church of the celestins. but until the th century was several years old the foreign fashion made but slow headway against the national style, the "flamboyant" gothic, which con- tinued to prevail in ecclesiastical work generally, and with diminishing strength in secular and domestic ar- chitecture and furniture. the portion of a turret- corbel in fig. shows the mixture of the two styles in its moldings. the influx of italian artists who came in fig. .—correl from verneuh.. a history of ornament with charles viii and louis xii made no perceptible impression on french architecture in general. but they at least taught the french carvers—the tailleurs de pierre—to execute scrolls and arabesques in the italian or "antique" manner, as in certain ornaments in the arcade-piers of the east side of the court of the chateau or palace of blois, and in the decorative details of the chateau de gaillon now in the court of the ecole des beaux-arts at paris. in the expense accounts of this work one pierre delorme signs his name with the addendum "tailleur [de pierre] a l'antique et a la mode de france"; that is, carver in both the renaissance and gothic styles. the beautiful tomb of the children of charles viii in the cathedral of st. gatien at tours is probably the earliest work wholly in the new style by a french artist; it is by michel colombe, the greatest exponent of the early french renaissance and a deco- rative sculptor of consummate skill ( - ). he was assisted in this, and perhaps also in other works, by an italian, geronimo da fiesole (fig. ). to colombe also are attributed the two great compositions which adorn the interior ends of the transepts of the abbey of solesmes, representing the entombment of christ and the life of the virgin. these sculptured groups are framed in architectural compositions in which the italian forms of pilasters and entablatures and arabesques are curiously blended with late gothic details. colombe also executed the splendid tomb of francis ii, duke of brittany (who died in ) in 'the chftteau de gaillon near rouen was built between and for the cardinal of amboise, and was demolished during the french revolution. renaissance in france, i association with a certain jean perreal; this work is in the cathedral of nantes and dates from (fig. ). in his panel of st. george and the dragon from gaillon, now in the louvre, the architectural frame is wholly in the new style. fig. .—end elevation, tomr or children or charles viii, tours. since the disappearance of the chateau de gaillon, in which the cardinal georges d'amboise embodied to the utmost his enthusiasm for the ideals of the renais- sance, the finest remaining monument of this period of transition is the cardinal's tomb in the cathedral of rouen: the masterpiece of roland or roulland leroux (figure ). this tomb was not erected until , but a history of ornament it is absolutely in the maturer style of the transition, in which we constantly find the medieval feeling and a strongly gothic composition, even when every detail is confessedly in the new style. rouen was the home of a particularly brilliant development or "school" of the fig. .—end elevation, tomr of francis ii, duke op brittany, nantes. flamboyant gothic style, and it here resisted for a long time the inroads of the italian or "antique" manner, except in subordinate details, in which the old and new styles are constantly and curiously mixed. but this mixture was by no means confined to rouen or to northern france; the door whose detail is shown in figure a is from aix in southern france. the style of francis i. under this monarch, after his disastrous defeat at pavia in , his imprisonment at madrid for a year and his release on payment of an enormous ransom, renaissance in france, i french architecture underwent a gradual but steady and complete transformation, covering the first half of the valois period. after it is almost impossible to find a gothic detail except in ecclesiastical works, and even in these the apparently gothic forms of taber- nacles, ribbed vaults and clustered shafts, are treated with purely classical profiles and details, as in the choir- screen of the cathedral of limoges, the doors of beau- vais cathedral, the entrance-portal of the chateau of azay-le-rideau, the vault of the chapel at tillieres and the whole interior of st. eustache at paris. francis i was an indefatigable builder of palaces and chateaux and an enthusiastic employer of italian artists. at different times during his reign of thirty-two years he summoned from italy the architects serlio and vignola, the painter-decorators primaticcio and ii rosso ("le primatice" and "maitre roux"), the sculptor and metalworker benvenuto cellini, the sculptor-ceramist girolamo della robbia, and several others of less note. except for medallions on the now-vanished chateau de madrid by the last-named, and decorations of the gal- lery of francis i at fontainebleau by primaticcio and ii rosso, their direct influence on architecture was almost nil. their indirect influence, however, was great; for although constantly overruled by the french master-builders in the general composition of the pal- aces on which they were employed, they taught the french the decorative value of the classic moldings and * sebastiano serlio of bologna, - ; giacomo bnrozzi da vignola, - ; francesco primaticcio of bologna, - ; giovanni bat- tista di giacopo, called ii rosso, of florence, - ; girolamo della robbia of florence, - . a history of ornament orders and planted the seeds of a new taste in decorative detail. the extent of the change which resulted may be gauged by compar- qjjlljlilililjljlfjlbjlil^jlijlijjlijijli j jng the francis i open staircase at blois (figure ), dating from about , with the court of the louvre begun in , a year before the death of francis i, by the courtier- architect pierre les- cot, or the tomb of the cardinal of am- boise with that of louis xii at st. denis (figures , ). intermediate between these two extremes are such works as the chateau of chambord, wholly gothic in feeling but without a trace of gothic detail, the hotel d'ecoville at caen, or the archbishop's palace at sens, this last late in date but not yet classical in character. characteristic features of the decoration of this pe- riod are the following: as to general composition, the fio. .—one bay of court north wino of blois. fa ade. renaissance in france, i "plaid" system of wall or facade design, with contin- uous vertical lines of pilasters flanking the windows, crossed by widely separated architrave and cornice moldings (fig. ); mullioned and transomed win- dows; high dormers and chimneys, and an animated sky- line of pointed roof-masses; openings usually square- headed or spanned by flat elliptical arches. there are no colonnades, and the stateliness and formality of classic architecture are wholly wanting. francis i details. in the details of this archi- tecture we observe first of all the utter freedom with which the orders were treated, partly through ignorance of the classic canons, partly through the persistence of the gallic lamg baj • •. m • j j j fio. .—pilaster and entarla- spint ot independence and turei chamrord. love of the picturesque. pilasters were almost always preferred to columns; they were with few exceptions of the corinthianesque type, and hardly ever fluted. they were given but slight projection, and their faces were either plain, pan- eled with circular or diamond-shaped panels (fig. ), or carved with arabesques (fig. ; pi. vii, ). a a history of ornament common treatment of the entablature was to run the architrave over the tops of the windows of one story and to separate it by a very wide frieze from the cornice, which was made to serve as a continuous sill for the win- dows of the next story (fig. ). cornice and archi- trave were little more than groups of moldings broken out over each pilaster, thus producing the "plaid" effect fio. .—upper part of a francis i doorway, toulouse. mentioned above. examples are seen in the francis i wing at blois and the chateau of chambord. engaged columns are rare, and free columns hardly occur at all except in arcades, as in the archbishop's palace at sens. a unique type of cornice, and one so beautiful that it de- served a development and perpetuation which it never received, is the arcaded cornice that crowns the court facade of the francis i wing at blois. arches are more often elliptical than semicircular renaissance in france, i (fig. ), especially over doorways, and are some- times molded in the soffit like gothic arches, though in other cases the soffits may be paneled like the pilasters with circular or diamond-shaped panels. doorways are commonly flanked by pilasters, and not infrequently fio. + .—upper part of a fig. .—typical francis i francis i dormer. s-scroix. adorned with surface-decoration of the wall-space above them in a manner suggestive of spanish influence (fig. ). dormers are a conspicuous feature of the style. they were usually flanked by pilasters and topped by gables of capricious outline or carried up into a deco- rative second story narrower than the lower or window- story, with pilasters and gables of its own connected with the lower stage by pseudo-flying-buttresses com- a history of ornament posed of an s-scroll abutting against a candelabrum- pinnacle (fig. ; pi. vii, ; figure ). tkey constitute a highly decorative element of the chateau exteriors, reminiscent of the high flamboyant gothic dor- mers of the late gothic and transi- tion periods, and persist through the whole reign of francis i. carved details of the style include, first of all, the heraldic salamander (figure b) of francis i and the f adorned with a crown (fig. ; fig- ure ); the shell adorning niche-caps and small semicircular pediments (fig. ; figure ); the s-scroll in manifold combination (fig. ; figure ; pi. vii, ); the candela- brum-shaft in an endless variety of forms, used as a pinnacle or as an or- nament against piers or pilasters (figs. , ; figure b, c; pl vii, ); paneling with circles, half- circles, "lozenges" or diamonds and half-diamonds as already explained; and arabesques of extraordinary deli- cacy and variety on panels and pilasters (fig. ; figures , ; pi . vii, ). the decorative candelabrum-shaft is a significant reminiscence of pavia and the french campaign in lombardy, where it was widely used (fig. ; see p. ). it is interesting to note its almost simulta- fio. .—candela- rrum shaft from toulouse. renaissance in france, i neous blossoming out in the architecture of france and spain (see p. ) after the battle of pavia, victors and vanquished alike having, so to speak, carried it back with them to their respective countries. the treatment of the carving in relief, based upon the arabesques derived from italy (fig. ; figures h, ), was frequently more delicate, certainly lighter and more minute, than the corresponding italian work. fio. .—carved rinceau, chateau de paony. the principle of varied relief, with its contrasting of strong rounded masses with subordinate details almost fading into the background, is often both brilliant and subtle, as in the examples from bonnivet and the tomb of philippe de commines (figures h, ). but it often errs by over-minuteness, suggesting silversmith's work or jewelry rather than architecture, as in the stair- case of francis i at blois (figure /). this tendency to minuteness is a survival from the late gothic and transition periods. it is less open to criticism in the choir-stalls and furniture of the period than in major works of architecture. a history of ornament capitals; balustrades. the corinthianesque was the only type of capital in general use until the time of henry ii, during whose reign the doric and ionic orders began to appear. the capitals of the francis i period show great variety of treatment, often a charming fancy, and in beauty of light-and-shade and relief fall little behind their italian exemplars (pi. vii, , ). the classic italian balus- trade was during this period replaced either by carved stone parapets or by fanciful and highly ornate balus- trades as at blois (pi. vii, ). interior decoration: ceilings. the favorite type of ceiling in the earlier half of the period was the "beam ceiling," with heavy timber girders where the span demanded them, and square beams set about two feet apart and richly painted. the wood or plaster ceiling-spaces between the beams and carried by them were also painted with arabesques or other devices, as at blois. in the francis i gallery at fontainebleau the ceiling between the girders is pan- eled in wood in an intricate geometrical pattern in place of the more usual treatment with beams. such paneled ceilings became increasingly common thereafter, but the panels were usually shallow and not deeply coffered as was later the practice derived from italy. (see pi. vii, .) vaulting in carefully-cut stone occurs in secular work chiefly over corridors and entrance halls, as at chambord, and is then often treated with square rosetted coffers. in ecclesiastical work various forms of ribbed vaulting are found, often highly ornate with renaissance in france, i elaborate pendants at the intersections as at tillieres, the chapel at rue and some other examples. these show a curious persistence of the influence of english fan-vaulting on the late french gothic, transmitted to the french renaissance architecture and interpreted with renaissance details. the vaulting of the great church of st. eustache at paris is a purely gothic ribbed vault except for its round arches and the profil- ing of its rib-moldings. the use of stucco enrichments was not general until a later period. fireplaces. with the increase in privacy and comfort in domestic architecture, fireplaces were provided in every room of importance and treated with elaborate decorations of carving and sculpture. they were of stone, the wooden mantelpiece being as yet unknown, and were built with projecting hoods, though these were much smaller than those of the preceding century. in some cases, however, the chimneypiece was set back into the projecting chimney-breast itself. those in the chateau de blois are chiefly modern restorations from fragments sur- viving from the demolitions and alterations of the eighteenth century, but they are no doubt fairly correct reproductions of the original aspect of these important features of the interior decoration of the age of francis i (figure c). woodwork and furniture. wainscoting in wood was a practice peculiar to the damp and well-wooded countries of northern europe. a history of ornament it never prevailed in italy and was not common in southern france, but was frequent in northern france. the most notable example is that of the francis i gallery at fontainebleau, where the de- cidedly bizarre and baroque character of the stucco decora- tions above the wainscot, by the italians primaticcio and ii rosso (fig. ) to some ex- tent influenced the carving of the wainscot panels. in these the ragged and curled-over es- cutcheons so dear to the italians appear for the first time in france (fig. ; pi. vii, ); they were destined to great pop- ularity during the next three or four reigns. other examples of wainscot design show more of the delicacy and charm of the francis i style, as in the ex- fio. i .-sru«o enrich- ample from st- vincent at men™, galimt or francis rouen (pi. vii, ) . the same i, fontainerleau. v' french refinement of taste ap- pears in various choir-stalls, wooden screens and carved doors of the period. with regard to the furniture, it must be observed that the french were behind the italians in the amenities and refinements of their social and civic life, and there was no such abundance and variety of sumptuous furni- renaissance in france, i ture in the french chateaux and palaces as in the ital- ian of that time. but though less varied and numerous, the examples of french furniture that have come down to us from the francis i period are often of great beauty of detail and execution. this is particularly fig. .—panel from wainscot, fig. .—a francis i. gallery or francis i, fon- chair. tainebleau. true of the chairs which, although uncomfortable and uncompromising in shape, with straight backs, legs and arms, are carved with shells, arabesques, s-scrolls and candelabrum shafts and finials, in a fashion which in- clines one to wonder whether the cabinet-makers derived their designs from architecture or the architects theirs a history of ornament from the furniture (fig. ). tables seem to have been but little used, and there have come down to us no type-forms of table-support, of bedsteads, benches, clothes-chests, cabinets or dressers from this period until its very close. this is the more remarkable when we recall the lavish display of costumes and jewels of this reign and the monarch's extravagance in castle- building. for the introduction of the other sumptuary arts the king depended entirely on foreigners, chiefly italians and flemings. the weaving of brocades and of tapes- tries was thus domesticated in france. ceramic work made little progress during this reign. the famous bernard palissy began his experiments in , but did not finally produce his white enameled and decorated wares until under henry ii. the later valois period. henry ii was a less enthusiastic patron of the arts than his father, but the onward march of the style con- tinued, and the italian queen catherine de' medici ("de medicis" as the french write her name) supplied what the king lacked in artistic zeal and greatly en- couraged the italian trend of taste and style. in archi- tecture three architects, whose careers had begun under francis i, achieved their most notable masterpieces during this reign:—pierre lescot the courtier and ama- teur, descended from the alessi of italy, in the new palace of the louvre; jean bullant in the chateau of ecouen; and philibert delorme, the first professionally •pierre lescot, - ; jean bullant, - ; philibert delorme or de l'orme, - . renaissance in france, i trained french architect, in tlje tomb of francis i at st. denis, the tuileries projected and partly built for the queen, and the chateau d'anet, of which only minor parts are now extant, and of which the entrance-bay was saved and re-erected in the court of the ecole des beaux-arts at paris. in these works, as in the chateau of ancy-le-franc, now known to have been largely de- signed by the italian serlio but long ago demolished, in the church at les andelys, the fountain of the inno- cents by lescot and jean goujon (taken down and re- erected in modified form in ), the classic forms of column, pilaster and entablature appear as essential features employed in the classic manner, though not always with classical correctness. in churches espe- cially, as at les andelys, the lingering tradition of gothic design still appears in details, though even these are gothic only in derivation, not in actual form. the change in style, and particularly in the use of the orders, may be gauged by comparing the tomb of francis i by delorme with that of louis xii also at st. denis, executed in by the two justes, or the facade of the louvre by lescot with chambord or the north wing of rlois (figure /). architectural details. resides the more classic proportioning, profiling and treatment of the orders in this period as compared with the preceding, a complete change occurred in the character of all the details. dormers were no longer made either as high or as ornate as formerly, and all the details were more strictly classic (pi. vii, ). a history of ornament instead of the salamander, the symbol of francis i, there appears the king's monogram, in some cases asso- ciated with the d as the initial of his mistress diana of poitiers, though ostensibly the two reversed d's were fio. .—doorway at clermont-ferrand. supposed to be two c's—catherine's initial—reversed against the uprights of the royal h (center of escutcheon pi. vii, ; see also fanlight in fig. ). the elliptical arch gives place to the round arch; doors and windows appear with entablatures or pediments above them; the circular and diamond-shaped panels renaissance in france, i disappear from the pilasters, and the candelabrum- shaft no longer serves as an architectural support or pilaster decoration. the escutcheon and cartouche with "curlicue" ornaments became established as decorative features in architecture both external and internal (see pi. vii, , ), testifying to the italian- fio. .—chimney-top, chateau d'anet. izing influence of the medicean queen. this also appears in the gcdne, of which an early example is shown in pi. vii, , from the hotel lasbordes at toulouse, and in the same plate no. , a doorway of the church of notre dame at chalons-sur-marne dating from the last years of henry ii, contemporaneously with its earliest use in italian architecture. a history of ornament in all this transformation of forms and details there is a corresponding change in the spirit and artistic character of the carving. it no longer exhibits the finesse, the minuteness of detail and delicacy of relief of the previous period, inherited from the expiring gothic. the relief is stronger, the forms more dis- tinctly classic and architectural, the combinations more formal and correct (figs. , ). interiors. the transformation of the interior ornament corre- sponded with that of the exterior. ceilings were coffered and paneled more after the italian fashion; though at fontainebleau and blois the combination of girders and flat paneling still continued in use. wainscoting was simpler, with plain rectangular panels (fig. ; figure ), and chimneypieces were more strictly architectural in design. the "mantel" or hood was flattened back to the chimney-breast or disappeared entirely (figure ). furniture and minor arts. the third quarter of the century (under henry hi and iv) saw a great and rapid increase in the variety of furniture commonly employed in fine houses: in chairs, tables, bedsteads, dressers and cabinets, all of which had begun to appear during the reigns of henry ii and charles ix in considerable number and great elegance of design, but were greatly multiplied and elaborated under their successors (fig. ). here also the influence of the florentine queen counted for renaissance in france, i much in assimilating the italian ^standards of court life in the furnishings and equipments of her own french environment; for she dominated the taste and life of the french court during the reigns of charles fio. .—wainscot and bahut, chateau de che^verny. ix and henry iii, dying in the same year as her grandson, . the furniture of these three reigns (francis ii reigned but a few months in - and may be dis- regarded) exhibits generally a strongly architectural a history of ornament quality in its composition and main lines (fig. ), combined often with a riotous profusion of carved and sculptured ornament. this ornament displays much more of figure-sculpture and grotesques than that of francis i; it is all in stronger relief, more crowded, more sumptuous in general effect, less well composed fio. .—tarle, style or charles ix - henry ii. and distributed (fig. ; figures , ), although superb in technical execution. the italian influence, transmitted in part indirectly by flemish cabinet- makers, is seen especially in the increasing use of gaines and of curlicued escutcheons, in the forms of tables and in the grotesques. this tendency may be recognized in the beautiful shrine or urn by pierre bontemps, serving as a receptacle for the heart of francis l though not precisely an article of furniture in the cm renaissance in france, i ordinary sense, in style and scale it may fairly be classed in this category (fig. ). the dominant per- sonalities in this field of design were j. androuet ducerceau and hugues sambin. of the two, sambin was the more prolific of executed works, but ducerceau, fig. .—panel of cuproard ry fig. .—shrine for heart of samrin. francis i. who executed little, and who on account of his religion— he being a huguenot—was twice driven from france, exercised a powerful influence on design by his books of engravings of buildings ("les plus excellens * jacques androuet, surnamed "du cerceau" ("of the circle" from a circle in tbe sign over his studio): architect, engraver and author, - ; hugues sambin, architect and sculptor of dijon, contemporary of ducerceau; dates of his birth and death not available. a history of ornament bastimens de france") and of decorative details and designs. his two sons jacques and batiste were prominent in the architec- ture of the following reign. in the works of father and sons we observe the growth of the italian baroque in- fluence, a tendency towards exaggeration, towards the bizarre and the fantastic. but a tasteful simplicity is sometimes met with in this period, as in the door-panel (fig. ), and the panel from the louvre in fig. . in the minor arts, tap- fio. is .—panel from a door, estry and needlework de- cluny museum, par is. i j a j . veloped to a moderate ex- tent, though the court depended for these chiefly on importations from italy and flanders. the atelier for fio. .—panel from so-called chamrer of henry iv, louvre, paris. tapestry-weaving established by francis i with flemish weavers does not seem to have long continued. neither renaissance in france, i could the french metalworkers as yet rival those of italy, and the famous suit of armor of henry ii was of italian make (see p. ). but much excellent work was done in smaller objects in iron and brass, such as fio. .—henry ii bronze fio. a.—door-knocker from door-pull. narronne. door-hardware, drawer-pulls and the like (fig. ; figure ; pi . vii, ). the beginnings of french ceramic art belong to this period, as its foundations were laid under francis i and its most significant early development occurred under henry ii and charles ix a history of ornament (fig. ). but for greater continuity of treatment the discussion of this branch of french decorative art will be deferred to the close of the next chapter. decorative sculpture. sculpture, which under francis i had been almost entirely subordinated to architecture, began under henry ii to assume independent importance, and to take on more of the classic and monumental quality in its associa- tion with architecture. it was developed under the hands of a remarkable group of sculptors who united great technical skill with exquisite artistic taste and a keen sense of architectural f». -enameled plate propriety. the greatest of these ry penicaud. men> an(j one gf the greatest decorative sculptors of all time, was jean goujon of rouen ( - ), like ducerceau and palissy a huguenot, who, however, succeeded in retaining the favor of the kings and of catherine, under whom he worked in association with pierre lescot on the louvre, and with philibert delorme on the chateau d'anet and other works. he designed the fontaine des innocents in its original form, the famous tribune des caryatides in the louvre, and the tomb of louis de breze in the cathedral of rouen. to him are also at- tributed the beautiful carved doors of the church of st. maclou at rouen. next to him in ability was germain renaissance in france, i pilon ( - ), who executed the sculptures of the tombs of francis i and of henry ii at st. denis and the exquisite decorative group of three female figures supporting the urn containing the heart of henry ii now in the louvre; these figures are carved in wood. other noted sculptors of the time were barthelemy prieur and pierre bontemps. to the latter is due the funerary urn of francis i (fig. ), also at st. denis. hugues sambin, already mentioned on p. , was chiefly occupied with designs of furniture. to sum up briefly the character of this period, which came to an end with the extinction of the valois dynasty at the death of henry iii in , we note first of all the final disappearance of the last vestiges of gothic tradition and detail before the growing classicalism of the age. this was due in part to the influence of catherine de medicis herself and of the italians whom she attached to her court; but it was quite as largely due to the training of the architects and sculptors, and in part also to the general progress everywhere of the "new learning" and of the public taste educated under its influence. at the same time, along with this italianiz, ing tendency towards the formal and the classic, towards carefully-ordered architectural stateliness and propriety, there are still traces of the refinement and freedom of the preceding style, and the orders are still employed with much license of detail, though with careful restraint in the matter of scale. the best work of this period pos- sesses great decorative charm by reason of these quali- ties, for it has neither the smallness and lack of force a history of ornament of much francis i work nor the baroque fantasticality and frequent heaviness of the next period. the bourbon period: - . this period of forty-six years or thereabout, cover- ing the reign of henry iii, the last of the valois kings, of henry iv the first bourbon king, and the first part of that of louis xiii, can hardly be other- wise characterized than as a period of oscillation between conflicting tendencies. on the one hand we have the palladianizing drift of arch- itecture, strongly reinforced by the advent of a new medicean queen, marie de medicis, henry iv's impe- rious florentine consort, who introduced a whole new train of italians into the french church and state. on the other we have the gallic spirit, impatient of formulas, independent and imaginative. between these two tendencies archi- tectural design oscillated now towards the extreme of baroque stiffness, as in the grande galerie of the tuileries ( - ), with its huge bare pilasters, alternating triangular and curved pediments and awkwardly broken entablatures, or the hotel lamoig- renaissance in france, i non (fig. ); now towards the extreme of fanciful and unregulated detail, as in the portal of the hotel de vogue at dijon (figure ), or that of the chateau des ifs. the french builders of the time seized upon the eccentricities of baroque detail and used them in their own way, with results which are rich and playful in effect, but often so illogical and bizarre as to merit fro. .—brick and stone architecture, detail. severe criticism. a frequent fault is the exaggeration of the voussoirs of arches, and of bossages or pro- jecting blocks interrupting the architectural lines (pi. vii, ). but the french builders of this period introduced one innovation of the greatest importance in the combina- tion of brick and stone in exterior design, which they handled with great skill. the stone-work forms the corners, the window-dressings and the cornice, in a system of rusticated "chains," usually of long-and-short work, with brickwork either plain or patterned for the flat wall-surfaces or fillings (fig. ), as in the places a history of ornament dauphine and des vosges, paris. in the chateau de beaumesnil the same system was employed although the wall-surfaces are of ashlar instead of brick. fig. .—bull's-eye window, house in toulouse. in the carved ornament of this period the cartouche became increasingly common, together with palm- branches, seldom of graceful design, and cansoles with broken curves, meaningless draperies and other baroque fio. ( .—typographic ornament ry th£o. de bry. features (fig. ). typographic ornament was in- fluenced both by dutch taste and by italian ceramics, as in the border by theodore de bry ( ) in fig. . renaissance in france, i interior detail. the beamed ceiling still continued to be used, but heavily paneled ceilings were more generally favored. chimneypieces were often overloaded with sculpture and carving. interior woodwork of wainscotings and doors was frequently painted in white with gilt moldings and painted arabesques or "nielles," in marked contrast to the heavy and overcharged detail of the chimney- pieces (fig. a). period of louis xiii. no clear dividing line can be traced between the styles of henry iv and louis xiii, but there is a gradual progress towards the monu- mental classicism that was to mark the reign of louis xiv, combined with fre- quent and singular exaggerations of baroque decorative detail. it would seem as though the independent gallic spirit wished to protest against the in- creasing domination of the classic ten- dency by greater extravagance in the use of scrolls and escutcheons, car- touches, palm-branches, heads, gaines and every device of non-structural, fan- tastic ornament to break up the monot- ony of plain surfaces, both without and within the building. the result was a baroque style quite different from the italian, but ani- mated by the same effort to surprise the spectator and fio. a. — louis xiii painted nielli, chateau of cheverny. a history of ornament to produce an effect of restlessness rather than of repose. this is seen in such examples as the facades of st. paul- st. louis and st. etienne du mont at paris, of the minimes at tours and ste. marie at nevers; and in inte- rior works at fontainebleau, especially in the* chapel of the trinity, as well as in many doorways and chimneypieces. at the same time there were built such dignified and classic edifices as the luxembourg palace by salomon de brosse for the dowager queen ma- rie, with almost no ornament but that of the rusticated or- ders, inspired from the garden front of the pitti palace at p ,« tj n „ florence (figure ), the fig. .—facade, church op \ o / > st. paul-st. louis, park. same architect's facade for the church of st. gervais, lemer- cier's pavillon de l'horloge in the louvre, and francois mansart's 'aile de gaston" or west wing of the chateau of blois for gaston d'orleans. doors and doorways. many of the louis xiii doorways, both interior and exterior, display in the over-door space or the arch- tympanum singular and even grotesque variations of •jacques lemercicr, j ~l ; francois mansart, - g ; both under louis xiii and xiv. renaissance in france, i the cartouche motive, which often ^takes on a meaning- less and sprawling form (fig. ). in some cases it is made to assume the likeness of a grotesque mask; in others a helmeted head or bust forms the central fig. '.—three louis xiii ovek-doors. motive. but these eccentricities disappear by the end of the reign. the doors themselves received very diverse treat- ment. main entrance-doors had in the previous period, a history of ornament especially under henry iv, begun to take on a definite type which has, with variations, persisted to the present day. with the progress of domestic architecture in cities the driveway-entrance into the court—the porte* cochere or coach-gate—took on greater importance (pi. viii, ). it was usually arched, with an ornately carved tympanum above the door proper. the latter was in two leaves, in one of which a smaller door was provided for the admission of pedestrians when the two leaves were closed. this smaller door provided a motive which was repeated in the other half, and the entire composition was decoratively treated with richly molded panels, colonettes, small pediments and carving of masks, scrolls and escutcheons. this decoration in- creased in richness and in crowded detail in high relief under louis xiii. the celebrated door to the chapel of the trinity at fontainebleau illustrates the heaviness and inappropriateness of much of this detail, in spite of its remarkably skilful execution. furniture. during the entire period of nearly one hundred years from the accession of henry ii to that of louis xiv ( - ), there was steady progress in the variety and richness of domestic furniture. under francis i the simplicity and scarcity of furniture had been, as we have seen, in singular contrast to the splendor of the architecture and the magnificence of the costumes and plate to be seen in palaces and chateaux. the contribu- tion made by the books of designs of hugues sambin and j. a. ducerceau to the art of furniture-making has renaissance in france, i been mentioned. to these should be added the name of nicolas bachelier of toulouse, a cabinet-maker, archi- tect and sculptor, to whom we owe the very ornate chapel-screen in the cathedral of rodez (figure ). thus dijon, the home of sambin, and toulouse, the home of bachelier, became important centers of furni- ture design, and southern france began to rival the north. the furniture of this entire period is marked in general by extreme richness, often excessive in its use of grotesques, gaines, escutcheons and human figures, all in high relief and crowded in composition. heads, female busts, deities and symbolic figures abound, quite unrelated to any special purpose of the furniture or to each other; beautifully carved and pro- ducing an undeniably sumptuous effect, but lacking in sobriety and restraint. many of the artists were foreigners from flanders, holland, germany and spain, and the flemish influence was particularly strong. "the impression resulting from an examina- tion of all this furniture of complicated structure and inordinate decoration ... is very much the same as that produced through studying the history of the manners of the time. french life under henry ii, charles ix and henry iii, all semi-italian princes, dominated by their talented mother the florentine catherine de medicis, was an extraordinary mixture of terror and luxury." the extravagance of the court and nobility knew no bounds and "was reflected," says saglio, "in the domestic furniture by the excess of "andr£ saglio, "french furniture," p. (batsford, london). a history of ornament ornamentation lavished upon it. . . . everything, must be alike costly and distorted." this verdict on the taste of the three reigns which closed the valois period is also valid for the reign of henry iv, the first bourbon king, and a large part of that of louis xiii, who succeeded him (fig. ). sons and descendants under louis xiv. the italian influence was reinforced by the jesuits who flocked to the french medicean court after the decree of expul- sion against them of was repealed. the most important changes in furniture design in this early bourbon period were in the shapes of chairs, in the increased vogue and variety of cabinets or "armoires" and dressers (fig. ), and in the intro- fio. .—louis xiii cradle. the foreign element com- pletely dominated furniture design, the spanish being par- ticularly strong, along with the italian and flemish, the german and the swiss; while the french artisans were en- couraged by henry iv to study their art in holland. a veritable school of furniture design was established in the grande galerie of the louvre by louis xiii under foreign masters, among whom was the swiss boulle, whose name later became famous in the persons of his french-born renaissance in france, i duction of ebony, whence the french word "ebeniste" for a cabinet-maker. chairs were now made with light frames, often with turned posts and braces or "rounds," and with curved arms. the legs were sometimes straight, either square or turned, sometimes curved, with elaborate carved details. under louis xiii began the upholstering of seats and backs with tapes- tries or brocades in- stead of wood and leather—the beginning of a concession to ease and comfort, and of a special application of textile art, destined to become very important in the next reign. four-legged tables now began to displace the italian type with two carved end-supports, probably as the result of the northern influences from flanders, germany and holland. the legs, like those of the chairs, were in some cases straight, in others curved, and the straight legs were sometimes turned, more often square and tapering. the curved or cabriole leg, a reflection of the baroque tradition, was to become a dominant and distinctive feature of later furniture. fio. .—louis xiii carinet. a history of ornament more monumental and costly than either tables or chairs were the various types of cabinets or armoires which came into vogue, a fashion imported either from italy or spain. the french name suggests an original use of such pieces of furniture for the safe keeping of small arms, which were often costly works of french, german, spanish or italian armorers, engraved, chased, carved and inlaid, and sometimes set with jewels (see p. ). in italy cabinets were also employed for the keeping of medals, coins and jewels. figure and fig. illustrate the type, which was more varied than the italian, quite as architectural in form and composi- tion, highly ornate but not as profusely adorned with "attributes," emblems, figures and grotesques as the furniture of the preceding period. figure shows a mirror-frame almost florentine in design. ebony was much used, its cost and hardness apparently commend- ing it in spite of its funereal and somber color, which absorbs light and shade alike and kills delicate relief. the minor arts: henry ii to louis xiv. woodworking has been sufficiently discussed for the limits of this book. metalwork was not extensively developed in this period, and the earlier examples now extant show no ornament forms differing greatly from those of- architectural carving and furniture design. pi. vii, , representing a keyhole-plate from the hotel d' assezat at toulouse is a fair specimen of the art, displaying the cartouche-motive, scrolls and grotesque heads which so abound in the architecture and furniture. during the reign of louis xiii, however, wrought renaissance in france, i iron came increasingly into favor for grilles, gates, window-guards and balustrades. this last was a new application of the art, in which, through the entire re- mainder of the bourbon period, the french excelled all others, in designs architecturally appropriate and artistically elegant. textile art was in this period, like metalwork, mainly dependent on foreign importation; needlework, brocades and velvet coming chiefly from italy, especially from genoa and venice; laces from italy and flanders, tapestries from flanders. such work as was produced in france in these arts was for the most part executed either by foreigners or by frenchmen under foreign direction and in close imitation of the foreign products. no distinctively french types of design had as yet been matured, and no forms of ornament are in evidence in the textile work made in france at this time that can be called peculiarly french. it was not till the th cen- tury had passed well into its second half that the french genius asserted its independence and created its own models and patterns in these fields of design. limoges enamels. limoges, which had been in the middle ages famed for its production of ecclesiastical vessels enameled on metal, revived this ancient art in the early th century after a long period of decline. the great names asso- ciated with this revival are those of penicaud, raymond, and leonard limousin; they executed painted enamels in which the fusible coloring-earths were applied with a brush to the metal, without previously cutting out a a history of ornament bed for each separate color. the designs were in- fluenced by italian majolica models; but a deep blue or violet generally formed the background of the design, and the pattern in white was enriched with high lights in gold and shadings in grisaille. fig. illustrates the style and general effect of these productions in a plate by pénicaud (see also pl. x, nos. - , - ). books recommended: a. berty: la renaissance monumentale en france (morel, paris, ).—blondel: architecture française (paris, ).—c. daly: motifs historiques d'architecture et de sculpture (ducher, paris, ).—j. a. du cerceau: les plus excellents bastiments de la france (lévy, paris, ); oeuvres, meubles etc. (baldus, paris, n. d.).—p. gélis- didot: la peinture décorative en france du xvie au xviii" siècle (schmid, paris, ).—h. v. geymuller: baukunst der renaissance m frankreich (bergstràsser, stuttgart, ).—a. guérinet: détails de sculptures d' ornements. renaissance à louis xv (guérinet, paris, n. d.).—w. lubke: geschichte der renaissance in frankreich (ebncr & seubert, stuttgart, ).—c. martin: la renaissance en france (morancé, paris, ).—c. t. mathews: the renaissance under the valois kings (comstock, new york, ).—h. morley: palissy the potter (london, ).— e. muntz: la renaissance en italie et en france à l'époque de charles viii (hachette, paris, ).—l. palustre: la renaissance en france (quantin, paris, ).—r. pfnor: le château d'anet (poupart-davyl, paris, ); le palais de fontainebleau (champollion-figeac, paris, ).—e. rouyer: la renaissance de françois i à louis xvi (baudry, paris, ).—rouyer et darcel: l'art architectural en france (noblet & baudry, paris, ).—a. saglio: french furniture (batsford, london, ).—c. sauvageot: palais, hôtels, châteaux et maisons de la france (morel, paris, ). —w. h. ward: architecture of the renaissance in france (batsford, london, ). chapter vii the renaissance in france, ii the age of the louis. the long period of years covered by the extra- ordinarily long reigns of louis xiv and his great- grandson louis xv was marked by an equally extraor- dinary development of french art. two styles, easily distinguished in their culminating works and yet passing gradually from the first into the second through a brief transitional period called the regence, are known by the names of the two kings, in french louis quatorze and louis quinze. the reign of the first was the period in which french art, so long tutored by foreign designers, at least in all the minor arts, at last emanci- pated itself from their control, and while it assimilated their teaching, dominated them completely and thor- oughly gallicized every foreign element. so completely was this accomplished that in the second half of the th century we find both italy and germany borrow- ing freely the french decorative elements, at least in interior decoration and furniture. character of the louis xiv period. louis xiv, small of stature, homely of countenance but filled beyond measure with the conceit of his own a history of ornament greatness and craving the most servile flattery, was nevertheless a great king and a great patron of the arts. the man who could say "l'fitat c'est moi" and who loved to be called the sun king (le roi soleil) knew how to surround himself with men of distinguished ability, and encouraged literature and the arts by lavish expenditures for the works of men of genius, and for pensioning the creators of those works. he was the greatest builder-monarch of modern times, surpassing francis i in the extent and cost if not in the number of his palaces. he was, moreover, a man of pronounced tastes in the fine arts, and while he employed a host of foreigners in the development of the minor and acces- sory arts, he entrusted his great building enterprises wholly to french architects. moreover in all the arts of decoration the foreigners were so dominated by the french taste that these arts took on an entirely new aspect and developed a new and purely french style, quite justly called by the monarch's name. the king's taste favored the formally classic, alike in literature, in painting, in sculpture and in architecture, but it was the antique as seen through french eyes and interpreted in a french manner. in interior decoration and furni- ture the independent gallic fancy and taste were given free rein, and while there was everywhere observed a certain stateliness in the general lines and more struc- tural features of the design, the details were treated with the utmost freedom and with increasing caprice of fanciful invention. louis xiv came to the throne in . in he established the academy of painting and sculpture. renaissance in france, ii in , on the death of mazarin, he assumed absolute and supreme power, and made himself the dictator in the field of art as in all else. "his taste must govern throughout his kingdom, wherever the power of his academie could reach. . . . his adulators proclaimed that louis was the only person in france who had taste. he was certainly the only person in france who could exercise his taste to the extent of his desires. le brun was the man selected by the king to administer to his taste. all painters, sculptors, architects, designers and decorators must receive their orders from le brun and obey them. in louis founded the "manufacture royale des meubles de la couronne," in a mansion which gave the name of its former owner, gobelins, to the establishment. this enterprise, due to colbert, the suc- cessor of mazarin, later developed into the greatest of all establishments for the weaving of tapestries, but was for a long time concerned with all forms of decorative art—furniture, metalwork, jewelry and textiles. the academie and the gobelins thus became great art centers, and the "eclat of these two establishments was so great throughout the whole of europe as to eclipse all other schools or to convert them into mere reflections of themselves. it is from this moment that the world- wide supremacy of french art really begins." architectural design. louis' love of the grandiose after the formally classic manner was expressed in the exterior design of a re- *d. cady eaton, "a handlwok of modern french sculpture" (dodd, mead & co., new york, ). 'andre saglio, "french furniture," p. (batsford, london). a history of ornament markable series of great buildings. the completion of the louvre with its magnificent colonnade, the vast hotel des invalides, the stately dome of the invalides added to the hotel, and above all the colossal palace of versailles with its gigantic gardens, were so many ex- pressions of this taste. it was by no mere accident that the commonplace design by the aged bernini, whom louis had invited from rome to design the east front of the louvre, was rejected in favor of the purer classic design of the frenchman claude perrault, the court physician. the italians had taught the french archi- tects how to use the orders, and from the italian baroque the frenchman had learned the stateliness of the "colossal order"—the column and pilaster of the full height of two or more stories—with the resulting big- ness of scale in all the details; but under the influence largely of the king's severer taste they had rejected the eccentricities, the curved wall-surfaces and fantastically- broken pediments and huge scrolls of the italian fashion. now also the crowded and meaningless detail and contorted cartouches of the louis xiii style were rejected—as indeed had already been the case with the work of men like de brosse, francois mansart and lemercier, who began their careers under louis xiii but who lived and worked during the first part of the reign of the grand monarque. these men, with louis levau, were succeeded by jules hardouin (surnamed mansart after his grand-uncle francois mansart), who had assisted bruant in the design of the place vendome and who was the architect of the greater part of the •louis levau, - ; j. h. mansart, - . renaissance in france, ii palace of versailles, the grand trianon, the dome of the invalides and the chateau de marly. j. h. mansart followed his grand-uncle in his general preference for "small orders," that is, superposed orders each of the height of one story, as in the dome of the invalides and the versailles palace; but in the grand trianon and the chapel royal at versailles he wisely departed from this general rule. in the latter part of the king's reign the colossal order appeared more fre- quently, as in the colonnade of the louvre and the hotel de ville at beauvais. in all these works the palladian or vignola proportions and details were faithfully followed. exterior ornament was severely pruned; rustication was used sparingly and discreetly; ressauts or broken entablatures were rarely resorted to, and the general effect of the exterior was more often cold and bare than over-decorated (figure ). the combination of brick and stone so popular under henry iv and louis xiii hardly appears except in the earlier parts of the versailles palace by levau. a severe stateliness was the effect generally sought. interior decoration. the metaphorical "battle of the styles" between the gallic and latin tendencies appears therefore to have resulted in a decisive victory for the latin, so far as the architecture of the exterior was concerned. in reality it was a truce, or a divided victory, for in the interiors, at least of palaces and mansions, the gallic tendency was increasingly dominant, and by the end of the period completely triumphant. the style or styles that de- a history of ornament veloped in the sumptuous interior decorations of the louvre, versailles, the trianon and some of the great mansions or lesser palaces of the royal family and fio. .—decorative treatment, galerie d'apollon, louvre. relatives, were thoroughly and completely french. the flemish and italian elements in it were so thoroughly assimilated and fused that it requires the most minute renaissance in france, ii critical analysis to discover and separate them. in the earlier part of the period the classic pilaster, round arch and regular entablature were still used as at maisons- lafitte (pi. viii, ) and versailles, and the larger lines of the decoration were formal and monumental, but the details were free, and the classic forms were varied in ingenious and often charming ways (figure ; pi. viii, , ). this severer phase reached its highest expression in the galerie d'apollon in the louvre. in this splendid apartment one sees in the wall-decoration none but rectangu- lar panels and classic moldings (fig. ). the crossetted panels, each framing a (modern) picture in tapestry, are adorned with tro- phies of arms, grotesque masks, acanthus-leaves and the like. but there are departures from classic precedent: the frieze is a new french adaptation of the triglyph; the brackets or consoles under the picture are curved and carved in a french rather than roman spirit; the mold- ings are carved with ornaments drawn from nature or from fancy (fig. ). in the second half of the period the gallic fancy played alike with the composition and the details. the wall was divided into panels above the square-paneled wainscot; the wall-panels were alter- nately broad and narrow, framed in gilded moldings a history of ornament with smaller moldings forming a repeat or echo of the larger frame enclosing it; tops and bottoms of these frames were curved, or if square-ended, had their corners cut off by concave curves; medallions of con- ventional ornament adorned the centers of the panels, and often their tops and bottoms also; and the details of the decoration in relief displayed the utmost freedom of fancy in the scrolls, wreaths, festoons and acanthus foliage. flat surfaces and ceiling-coves were often filled with a diaper or net- work in low relief, and all the relief was gilded upon a ground of white or very pale green or gray. in contrast to this elaborate splendor, wainscot and fio. .—ceiling cove, versailles, doors were treated with square panels with little or no ornament except the gilded moldings; but delicately- painted flowers and melles sometimes appeared on the panels. de cotte, the elder oppenord, girardon and berain were among the leading designers of this, the most purely french of all the french phases of deco- rative art. ceilings were coved and finished in richly molded plaster (fig. ), with decorative paintings filling the larger spaces. the barrel vault was used in some cases, decorated in like manner with molded ornament in relief and historic or allegoric paintings, as in the im- posing galerie des glaces at versailles and the magnifi- renaissance in france, ii cent galerie d'apollon in the louvre. the chimney- piece and chimney-breast were flattened closer to the wall. the painting of arabesques in a manner derived from the italian but more solid and massive in effect was frequently resorted to. tapestries were not hung loose but framed and permanently set in the wall-panels. fio. .—door-panel, church of st. louis-en-l'ile, paris. all this interior decoration was carried out with a truly french delicacy and freedom of invention. while the rinceau, the acanthus leaf and the rosette formed the basis of this detail, these forms were handled with playful disregard of classic and italian canons (fig. ; pi. viii, , ). orders, arches and moldings were treated often with great freedom of detail, as in fig. . the heavy cartouches and curlicues of the louis xiii style disappeared. curved and sweeping lines gradually displaced the severe rectangularity of the earlier phase of the style, especially in the consoles and shelves of the fireplaces. a new element in the a history of ornament decorative scheme is the gold-framed mirror of plate glass over the mantel-shelf (pi. viii, ). this, which became an indispensable feature of every salon, cabinet and boudoir, and which in the galerie des glaces at versailles gave the key to the entire design, cannot be traced to its origin. it was probably an indirect im- portation from venice, which had long excelled in the production of mirrors. the mirror, of large size as an adjunct to the bureau or desk-cabinet, had be- come common under louis xiii. it now was trans- ferred from an article of movable furniture into a fixture on the wall, serving to multiply by reflection „ ,„ . t~ „. . the sparkle and glow of the fio. .—arch impost, hotel de r o lauzun, paris. hundreds of candles in sconces and crystal chan- deliers, which were another italian feature domesticated under louis xiii. another new element in the decorative system was the increasing use of marble, especially of dark-hued marbles in panels and as wall-veneers in the more public parts of palaces, such as entrance-halls and stairways— an obvious derivation from the italian baroque practice (see ante, p. ). as the reign of the aged king matured towards its close in (although his death did not occur until renaissance in france, ii ), classic formality in palace interiors progressively disappeared. round corners and swaying curves dominated all interior design, and the dignified and monumental sumptuosity which had prevailed under the artistic dictatorship of le brun gave way to the less serious, sometimes frivolous, intimate fancifulness of the regence. the later o/nament of the reign is often not distinguishable from that of the regence and earlier louis xv period (fig. ). in all this transformation of architectural design, certain special influences must be noted. in the first place the triumph of the classical or latin tendency in exterior design as well as in the interior design of churches, and the banishment from these of the florid and baroque extravagances of the two preceding reigns, was largely due to the french academy at rome, estab- lished by colbert in . although architects were not sent to this academy until the th century, its influence was powerful through the painters and sculptors who were its pupils, and this was exerted al- ways in favor of the antique and against the decadent baroque of italy. to this must be added the personal influence of the king and of his art-dictator le brun, who with all his faults and deficiencies used his vast authority in favor of the monumental, the dignified and the grandiose in decorative art, and who had the wisdom to call forth the best and ablest artists in france to serve the national art, not merely in architecture but also in furniture and all the minor arts. nothing was slurred, nothing was cheapened or vulgarized under his domina- a history of ornament tion, and all the artistic resources of the realm were marshaled, organized and encouraged. another powerful influence was that of a number of consummate draftsmen, designers and engravers who published books of decorative designs that had a wide circulation. among these were varin. jean and daniel marot. berain, and the two brothers jean and antoine fio. .—ornamest by lepautre. lepautre. the volumes of designs by these artists are to this day precious possessions in the libraries of art of at least two continents. fig. is taken from lepautre, and illustrates the unrestrained fancy and inventiveness of this artist. w. h. ward in his admirable book "the archi- tecture of the renaissance in france" lias so well characterized the style of louis xiv that i cannot re- frain from quoting a part of his comments (in vol. ii, p. ): "meanwhile in decoration france turned renaissance in france, ii alternately to flanders and to italy for inspiration, but the flemish influence with its naturalism or its license, declined and the italian increased. the influence of italy was composite. on the one hand the ancient monuments and the palladian school helped the puristic current. but on the other, in contemporary italy the roman barocco school was predominant. the french under louis xiv did not follow this school in its con- tempt for classical traditions, but borrowed first some of its fire and bigness of conception, secondly a few decorative motives, and lastly that sense of unity with which, like all italian schools, it was animated. "both the strict and the free classic influences thus had in them something congenial to the absolutist, cen- tralizing trend of the age and something in opposition to it. on the one side was respect for law and to some extent severity, combined with diversity; on the other was lawlessness but splendor, majesty and unity. the third or rationalistic influence acted usually as a moder- ating force, but allied itself now with the one school in encouraging simplicity, now with the other in giving rise to bizarre forms." "the three points in which the growth of classical influence is most marked during the first louis xiv period are the more correct use of classical elements, the attempts to increase unity of composition, and the refinement of decoration" (p. ). these quotations refer primarily to exterior archi- tecture. le brun's influence on interior decoration the same author characterizes as resulting in "a free a history of ornament decoration within a severe architecture"; "he always used a well-defined geometric pattern or architectural framework as a foil for the riot of swirling lines and the movement of painting arid altp-rilievo" (p. ). "louis xiv decoration retains the sumptuousness and the massive character of that of louis xiii, with even increased scale but greater refinement in the profiles and enrichments, and it dispenses with its complications and intricacies, its multiplication of similar members and repeated breaks and ressauts. with the fatiguing fussiness the coarse and grotesque elements also disappear. . . . there is an intellectual quality, a spirit of order and organization in louis xiv decora- tion which is as characteristic as its pomp and sumptuosity." the student of this style cannot do better than to read carefully the whole of the chapter from which these excerpts are taken (chapter v in vol. ii), especially pages - and - . no better analysis of the style has been written either in english or in french. louis xiv furniture. the splendor and extravagance of the court life under louis xiv, as well as the extraordinary artistic activity fostered by the king and his great minister colbert under le brun's direction, are reflected in the furniture. in italy the development of furniture- design had been independent, spontaneous and provin- cial. in france it was national, royal, and dominated by a single mind. there were two groups of designers renaissance in france, ii under the royal patronage, one domiciled in the louvre, the other in the gobelins. many of the artists in both groups were italians or of italian origin, like domenico cucci and filippo cafreri, giacetti and the two migliorini; but these were all naturalized, as were also a number of distinguished flemings, especially among the tapestry-workers. with these was associated a brilliant galaxy of french artists—painters, sculptors, engravers, jewelers and "ebenistes"—some of whom have been already mentioned. nowhere else, in any land or age, have so many artists of consummate skill been employed upon the single task of producing the decora- tions, hangings and furnishings of the palaces of a single monarch. it is no wonder that this became the great age of furniture. in the production of the tables, armoires or cabinets, the bureaux or table-desks surmounted by a cabinet or small chest of drawers, the chairs and sofas, the clocks, andirons, candelabra and girandoles or sconces, the mirrors and the commodes, the master-mind was that of andre charles boulle ( - ), the son of an ebeniste jean boulle, probably of swiss origin. he first appears in the royal accounts in , and three years later was lodged in the louvre. he was assisted and succeeded by his four sons. while few of his own works are still in existence, those of his sons, who suc- cessfully continued the paternal tradition, have been preserved and are among the most precious objects at versailles and in the louvre, and they had many imi- tators. the boulles were makers rather than designers of furniture, working largely from designs by berain a history of ornament and lepautre, the greatest ornamentists of their time, and by le brun. second only to boulle in artistic rank was s. j. oppenord (sander johann oppenordt), a hollander, whose son later became famous as an archi- tect under louis xv. the characteristics of the royal furniture were in general a certain severity of mass and outline in the heavier articles such as cabinets and bureaux, while the lighter objects, such as chairs and fauteuils, were de- signed with easy flowing curves in legs, backs and arms, and were upholstered with specially woven tapestry seats and backs. the exposed framework was deli- cately carved, with no superfluous elements, and was often gilded. the heavier pieces, made of dark wood and designed with monumental simplicity of outline, bore little carving in relief. the symbolic sculpture, the grotesques, gaines and cartouches of the italian taste and of the preceding reign, were abandoned in favor of a rich surface decoration with inlays of marquetry, brass and tortoise-shell, and applied ornaments of gilded bronze (fig. ; figure ). it was in the elegance, the dainty perfection of modeling of these ornaments that the furniture-makers of this period displayed their highest artistic skill, as they displayed their consum- mate workmanship in the framing and finish of the woodwork. boulle was not the inventor nor by any means the sole user of inlays of metal and tortoise-shell, but his name has been given by an uninformed public •jean berain, - ; jean le pautre or lepautre, - :.'; (btniste, designer and engraver; often confused with his brother antoine ( j - ) the architect, and with his son pierre who was hardouin man- sart's chief draftsman at versailles. renaissance in france, ii to this entire style of decoration. metal inlays and the use of gilded bronze enrichments on furniture were in reality derived from florence, though never there used to nearly the same extent as by boulle and his followers. in the cheaper furniture of the bourgeoisie which imi- fio. .—carinet ry boulle. tated the royal furniture, gilded papier-mache and gesso replaced the cast and chiseled bronze; or the relief orna- ments were carved in wood, gilded and applied. but even in this cheaper product there is often much of the french elegance and decorative effect of the style. in the designing of chairs and fauteuils (easy-chairs), settees and sofas, the french in this period introduced a history of ornament entirely new types. disregarding the straight lines and rectangular framework naturally suggested by con- struction in wood, they curved the back and arms of the chair and the front of the seat-frame, and later the legs also, sometimes the front legs only, leaving the back legs straight; sometimes all four. the fautevil was often made wide enough for two or three sitters, and finally developed into the sofa. towards the end of the th century all the lines were curved. the arms and front legs were generally carved, but without excess of ornament (fig. ). seats and backs were upholstered with rich brocades, or with tapes- tries specially designed and woven to fit each piece of furniture, often from cartoons by artists like berain and marot, as in the fine set in the altman collection in the metro- politan museum, new york. tables, like the chairs, were made with curved legs, richly but delicately carved and either gilded or orna- mented with applied decorations in gilded bronze (fig. fio. .—louis xiv fauteuil or easy-chair. figure. ~faxitan of 'oroxxz tlorloge.", rouen trwai/'af jauomt. k?/s'*j renaissance in france, ii ). a sort of half-table permanently set against the wall came into fashion and was called a console. clocks set upon a stand were also in demand. other secular and ecclesiastical woodwork. of other woodwork than that of furniture the most important branch was that of doors, both internal and external. the carved moldings and ornaments of such fio. .—louis xiv tarle. doors as were not decorated exclusively by painting or by gilded ornaments in low relief, usually but not always upon a white ground, were identical in character with those of the wall-paneling, but somewhat larger in scale and heavier in relief. the general type of external doors developed under the two previous reigns remained substantially un- changed, but the details of the ornamentation reflected the general advance in classic refinement which marked the architecture of the period (pi. viii, ). there was a good deal of ecclesiastical woodwork a history of ornament produced for the churches erected in this period: stalls for the choir and armoires for the sacristy. this wood- work was paneled and carved with the same delicate moldings, the same rounded corners, flowing acanthus leaves, palm-branches and fanciful scrolls as appear in the secular and domestic wall-decorations; there was no special adaptation to its religious function further than fig. .—iron balcony railing. the introduction of occasional religious emblems. the choir-stalls in the cathedral of notre dame at paris, although out of keeping with the architecture of the church, are in themselves excellent examples of louis xiv decoration in its more sober and restrained mood (pi. viii, ). metalwork. the skill of the louis xiv bronze-workers was not confined to applied relief-ornament on furniture. it was displayed also in the hardware of doors and win- dows, upon which even the great cucci did not disdain renaissance in france, ii to bestow his skill; and in the sconces or light-brackets, the andirons and fireplace-utensils of the royal palaces. ironwork was a less important art, but the grilles, window-guards- and gates of this period show the same "swagger" of pom- pously dignified de- sign, the same flowing grace of line and care- ful execution observ- able in the other branches of decorative art (figs. , ; pi. viii, ). garden art. while the magnifi- cent style of garden- design introduced by the great le notre ( - ) and car- ried to its utmost limit of imperial grandeur at versailles does not properly fall within the province of orna- ment as such; and while the decorative details employed in it were for the most part sculptural or purely architectural, the monumental vases which served to accentuate the composition at important points were works of ornament of the highest interest. fig. .—gate, choir of st. ouen, rouen. a history of ornament they were often of great size, executed in stone, marble, bronze or lead, of forms based on roman precedents, and decorated sometimes in purely classic fashion (e.g. the vase medicis, ver- sailles, pi. ix, ) or in freer style like the example from menard-le-chateau in fig. . textile decoration: tapes- tries. it was under louis xiv that the leadership, if not the supremacy, in the art of tapestry-weaving so long held by the flemings, passed from brussels to paris, thanks to the devel- vase, mefn'ar^le-chateau opment of the establish- ment at the gobelins. while the greatest designers of tapestries in the th century had been italians, the majority of the most notable italian tapestries had been actually woven in flanders. as early as in marc de comano and francois de la planche, flemish tapestry-weavers, in- stalled their work-rooms on the bank of the bievre in paris, where later the gobelins were established, and received a royal patent in . the works of this atelier are known as "early gobelins." sixty years later there were five small ateliers of tapestry in paris, s see my hist, of orn. i, figures , . t renaissance in france, ii which le brun consolidated into the royal atelier of the gobelins. meanwhile in another atelier had been established by royal decree at beauvais under a certain louis hinart, who was later bought out by ph. behagle of tournai. the tapestries of arras in french flanders, which had been the most celebrated of all the flemish weaves and had given the name of the city to tapestries in general ("arras" in english and "arazzi" in italian), had long before this lost their preeminence. the gobelins tapestries were not the first to be woven in france. there is a tradition that the saracens had brought the art to france in the time of charles martel ( a.d.), but if this be true, the art did not long flourish among the half-civilized franks, although it was called in the th century "an immemorial in- dustry." francis i had attempted to domesticate the industry at fontainebleau, and the atelier there con- tinued to exist into the reign of henry ii, but it seems to have disappeared before the end of the th century. it required the immense resources of louis xiv and the energy and artistic wisdom of a colbert and a le brun to establish it on a firm foundation. the gobelins weavery has ever since continued to maintain its supremacy in the art. the royal tapestries woven at the gobelins were chiefly wall-hangings of great size in sets representing series of scenes and episodes from ancient history and mythology, from cartoons by the most distinguished painters, including le bmn himself. for the orna- mentist the most interesting feature of these splendid works is the treatment of the borders. these were for a history of ornament the most part of a distinctly architectural character, with cartouches, festoons, heraldic attributes, infant forms and grotesques in rich colors, reproducing as closely as possible the effects of painted decorations, such as were executed in connection with mural and ceil- ing paintings (pi. x, , , , , , , ). this is, indeed, the chief fault of all the th century tapestries; they sought to imi- tate painting with all its light and shade and perspective, and thereby lost the frank flat and "mural" quality of the flem- ish weaves of the th and th centu- ries. besides these huge and monumental picture-tapestries there were others woven of a more purely ornamental character, which, although they also imitated painted decorations—many of them from designs by berain, lepautre, etc.—were less open to the above criticism because of their more purely conventional and orna- mental character. from a decorative point of view they are admirable in the playful fancifulness of their design. with these may be classed the pieces specially woven to serve as seats and backs for chairs and sofas. they made free use of floral designs—bouquets, wreaths, garlands and festoons—too realistically repre- fio. .—poi.nt-d'ai.encon lace. renaissance in france, ii fig. a.—french lace, seventeenth century. sented, perhaps, for the truest art,^but so well designed for the forms and spaces they were to decorate and so completely in harmony with the entire scheme of in- terior decoration of the time that severe criticism of their naturalism is fairly disarmed. in the velvets, broca- telles and brocades of this period there was a similar emancipation from for- eign styles, whether flemish or italian. es- pecially rich were the bro- cades, both of velvet and of satin, in which on the one hand floral designs began to appear, and on the other the classicizing influence of le bran asserted itself indirectly in patterns and motives based on the acanthus and rinceau with little or no reminiscence of oriental models. the same is true of the needlework and laces. colbert introduced into the royal ateliers thirty lace-makers from italy, and thus inaugurated an art and industry which rapidly developed into great importance. the "point d'alencon" (fig. ) was employed in patterns of remarkable richness, and has fig. ls- b.—needlework, velvet lamrrequin. bed- renaissance in france, ii art; a throwing off of the formality and pompous dig- nity that had so long been-the rule. there began a great activity in the building of sumptuous mansions for the nobility, in which the rebound towards a gay and frivolous social life could find free expression. externally these mansions, such as the hotels biron, matignon, soubise and others, still exhibit a classical fig. .— keystone decoration, versailles. simplicity, even severity, of mass and detail. the "latin" tendency is dominant, but without the ostenta- tion of colossal orders and huge sculptured pediments, and here and there segmental arches and concave re- veals to the jambs of doorways appear, and bits of fan- tastic ornament on keystones or door-tympanums (fig. ). within the walls, however, a new freedom of gallic fancy finds expression, alike in the decoration of walls and ceilings and in the furniture. every vestige of classical formality disappears. the straight line and right angle are avoided wherever possible; a history of orxament swaying lines are everywhere; shells, palm-branches and a kind of ragged acanthus leaf are constantly recurring motives. the tops and bottoms of all panels are curved and the corners cut off with a concave curve and a leaf (fig. ). roman cornices and round arches are banished. panels of walls and doors are enclosed nished the subjects of this decorative painting, treated with consummate skill and great delicacy of technic. this was the age of the salon and the boudoir; the decoration was gay, trivial or charming; the revolt from the academic, the formal, expressed itself in every line and curve, parallel with the licentiousness and un- blushing immorality of the social revolt from the • antoine wnttenu, h - ; nicolas lancret. - ; francois boucher, - ; jean honore fragonard, - d. paris. hotel soublsfc fic. .—corner of panel in hotel sourise, paris. in two or three separate lines of moldings, the finer ones inside the heavier outer moldings (figure ). decorative painting aban- dons the field of history, war and classical mythology and allegory, under the influence of watteau and lancret and their successors van loo, boucher and fragon- ard. an affectation of pas- toral simplicity and an arti- ficial rusticity of shepherds and shepherdesses dressed in satins and brocades fur- renaissance in france, ii affected pietism of the later years of the louis xiv regime. the regency, - . it is customary to assign the name of the eight years' period of the regency of philip of orleans to a supposed definite style, distinct alike from those which preceded and followed. no such distinction really exists; every feature and detail of the ornament of this period can be found either in the louis xiv or the louis xv style. indeed the louis quinze style itself is little more than the accentuation and exaggeration of elements already existing in that of louis quatorze. the "style regence" is merely the transition from the relative severity and formality of the louis xiv work to the greater freedom and fancifulness of the reign of the grand monarque's grandson. the decoration of the closing years of the th century and opening years of the th, even before the regency, cannot be easily distinguished from much that was done after ; it differs more from the earlier louis xiv work than from that of louis xv. the regency may, however, be easily identified in its furniture, which has more grace and freedom of form than that which preceded, without the fantastic and contorted extravagance of that which followed. louis quinze details. except possibly for the shell (fig. ), usually with ragged edges, it is impossible to find an ornament which is new or distinctive. the peculiarities of the style are a history of ornament those of manner and degree. the coves and other spaces filled with network or basket-diaper, the curved tops and bottoms of panels, corners cut off by quad- g | fig. .—louis xv shells on a bracket. rants, interrupted moldings, repetition of panel mold- ings within moldings, the ragged acanthus and palm, occur in both louis xiv and louis xv work. but in renaissance in france, ii the latter style the curves dominate, the architectural framework is less classic, less formal; there is more of minute and delicate arabesque, the shells and foliage are more ragged than ever (fig. ). in f urniture the straight line is completely abandoned (fig. ); the silhouette is often torn and distorted beyond all reason; the last vestige of structural expres- sion disappears. a new element, though not a new form, shows itself in the use of lac- quer or "vemis mar- tin" as a finish for fur- niture. this received its name from robert martin (born ), who with his family received a patent from the king for making furniture after the chinese and japanese fig. .—ceiling-cove, versailles. fashions, and was later appointed official "varnisher to the king." the verms martin became extremely fashionable; it was applied in various colors in designs which imitated chinese landscapes and figures and were known as chinoiseries. pictures introducing monkeys in the place of human figures also caught the fancy of the jaded society of the day; they were called singeries. 'madame de pompadour is recorded as having paid martin , livrcs in a single year for work done to her order. a history of ornament both on lacquered furniture and on tapestry and needlepoint upholsterings and draperies these chinois- eries and singeries competed with the pastorals and affected rusticalities of the watteau school for aristo- cratic favor, and were even introduced into the panel- paintings and wall-arabesques of salons in the great houses and royal palaces, watteau himself not disdain- ing to furnish the sketches for some of them. fio. .—commode ry caffieri. in the design and making of furniture, apart from this superficial decoration, the dominant name is that of cressent, an artist of inherited gifts, the son of a sculptor and himself primarily a worker in bronze, noted for his "exquisite figures of women placed at the corners of furniture, chiefly on tables, to which the name of espagnolettes was given." among his pupils was j. a. meissonier ( - ), an italian by birth, who "charles cressent, - ; probably a pupil of boulle. *a. saglio, "french furniture," p. (batsford, i-ondon). renaissance in france, ii was responsible, more than any one else, for the extrava- gances of the later louis quinze works, both in furni- ture and in interior decoration generally. the name genre rocaille (rockwork style) has been given to this later phase of the style, and often been applied incor- rectly to the entire louis xv development. along with meissonier one should mention the two cafrieri, jacques and philippe, son and grandson of that filippo caffieri who worked for louis xiv in the gobelins establishment; and the three brothers slodtz. it must not be supposed that the vernis-martin finish was the only one employed. with the decline of the structural expressiveness that had never been lost sight of under louis xiv, and the growing taste for purely superficial decoration, there appeared a quite new effect in the use of decorative veneers, applied so as to form symmetrical patterns of veining. these were especially resorted to on the smooth bulging surfaces that char- acterized much of the furniture, such as cupboards, commodes, chests of drawers and the like. the relief ornaments of gilded bronze, or in the commoner furni- ture of gilded wood or gilded gesso, were applied to these veneered surfaces. inlays of tortoise-shell and metal a la boulle almost wholly disappeared, but wood- inlay or intarsia came back into favor. many of the finest louis xv pieces in the metropolitan museum at new york are decorated in this way. in these developments as a whole we recognize the uninterrupted continuance of many of the louis xiv traditions, handed down from father to son and from master to pupil. there is nothing absolutely new ex- a history of ornament cept the spirit in which these traditions were handled. even the chinoiseries and singeries were not new; one finds them occasionally under louis xiv, for the fashion of collecting objets a" art from the far east had begun under louis xiii and mazarin. whatever may be said in dispraise of the riotous frivolity and fanciful extravagance of louis xv detail at its worst, one can- not deny its originality of inven- tion, its frequent charm of effect, and above all its wonderful exe- cution. there was no falling off in the painstaking workmanship or exquisite finish of detail in architectural works, in furniture, in textiles, in every appurte- nance of life on which the de- signer's skill could be bestowed. the louis xv style was, in all that distinguished it, a style of protest against tradition, at least against academic classical- ism and above all against royal dictation. in this, as in its predilection for curves, it re- sembled the art nouveau of the early th century. but unlike the latter movement, it never sought to break loose from the control of inherited traditions of pure design, or to ignore those fundamental laws of design which spring from the demands of construction, balance and order. in its wrought-ironwork the louis quinze style found the most congenial field for its love fio. .—balustrade ry h£ret, nancy. renaissance in france, ii of free unhampered design and for linear patterning in swaying curves. the special qualities of the material and the structural requirements of its use in grilles, gates and railings, lent themselves to this sort of design, which here, therefore, exhibits a propriety too often lacking in the furniture and architecture (fig. ). and in church architecture, in external architectural form generally, the age of louis xv still adhered to much of its classical inheritance: witness the facade of the church of st. sulpice, the cold classical purity of the pantheon, and most of the works of j. a. gabriel. the style of louis xvi. it was inevitable that a reaction should follow the extravagances of the louis xv style as well as those of the louis xv social regime. the pendulum was bound to swing back from the gallic end of its arc towards the latin and classic. indeed, this return had already begun under louis xv, as already suggested, asserting itself in the more monumental forms of archi- tecture, but appearing also in such works of lesser size as the petit trianon by gabriel and the grenelle foun- tain by bouchardon, dating as far back as . many influences tended to accelerate the movement before the death of the aged roue louis xv in . probably the most potent was the rapid development of archaeo- logical interest, stimulated by the discoveries in hercu- lanum, pompeii and paestum between and , the publication of stuart and revett's "antiquities of athens" in , and a remarkable succession of archaeo- "jacques ange gabriel of lyons, - . a history of ornament logical expeditions and publications in the last half of that century. the classical purism of english taste also influenced the french, and a new interest in na- ture, in the beauties of the landscape, in flowers and outdoor life were tak- ing the place of the artificial and dressed- up rusticity of the watteau tradition. simplicity, natural- ness, sobriety and re- finement began to find favor as a welcome change from the rest- less extravagance of the louis xv regime. the educated middle class, the upper bour- geoisie, was growing in power and was destined in time to overthrow both the aristocracy and the monarchy it- self, as its ultimate protest against a corrupt and selfish domination. chalons-jun marne fig. .—rustication and paneling, arch at chalons-sur-marne. architectural decoration. the classical purism of the later louis xv architec- ture continued to prevail in all exterior design. the twin colonnaded fronts on the north side of the place de la concorde, finished in ; the pantheon, begun in but not completed till ; the ecole de medi- cine by gondouin and his hotel de la monnaie; the hotel de salm (now the palace of the legion of renaissance in france, ii honor) by rousseau ( ); the grenelle fountain and the petit trianon, all alike exhibit this new taste for classic purity and refinement, although built at dates ranging through more than sixty years. along with these somewhat stately edifices, in which the roman orders were still the dominant element of the design, were many others from which they were wholly absent. fio. .—louis xvi window-head, house in rue du temple, paris. in these the careful proportioning of the voids and solids, a studied refining of all the profiles of cornices and moldings, a discreet use of quoins and rustication, a frequent resort to rectangular wall-panels, and a gen- eral avoidance of strong projections and large features, were the most noticeable characteristics (figs. , ). the colossal pilasters of victor louis' extension of the palais royal to enclose the garden behind it are a marked exception. a history of ornament interior decoration. it was in interior decoration that the period of louis seize achieved really new and distinctive results. the change came about rapidly, almost suddenly. the curved line disappeared from the wall-paneling and from the supporting members of the furniture, and with it the shells, the palms, the ragged acanthus leaves and fio. .—two console-brackets, ixiuis xvi. the quadrant-corners of the louis quinze style. chi- noiseries, singeries and sugary denatured pastorals were banished. all the ornament was based on classic prec- edents. frets and honeysuckles and rosettes of greek or roman origin came into favor. consoles and brack- ets were often designed largely or wholly with straight lines (fig. ). the heavy swags or festoons of the louis xiii and xiv periods were replaced by light and graceful festoons of naturalistic flowers, tied with fillets and bows of narrow ribbon and often hung across the upper part of a panel or mirror (fig. ; pi. ix, ). the relief decorations of plaster ceilings were in renaissance in france, ii light and graceful pat- terns in low relief, based on simple geometric sys- tems of composition, re- flecting perhaps some in- fluence from the adam brothers' work in eng- land (see p. ). in general, refinement, deli- cacy, quiet restraint char- acterized the style. furniture and metalwork. marte astolnetft- jxu.ttocbe l these qualities appear fl . i ._lodis xvi p.cture-frame. especially in the furniture and the metalwork, in which many of the motives above described were used. the straight line and right an- gle dominate the design of tables, bureaux and desks, cabinets, commodes and armoires (fig. ; pi. ix, ). while ve- neering, inlays of wood and sometimes of metal, and applied ornaments of gilt bronze were still characteristic, the entire aspect of the furniture was transformed by this fig. .—louis xvi commode, change of form and detail. a history of ornament chairs still had curved arms and sometimes curved backs, but the legs of both chairs and tables were always straight and tapered downwards (figs. , ). the tapestries of the upholstering were woven with designs fio. .—louis xvi chair. morilier fio. .—louis xvi candle- national. stick. chiefly floral. sconces, candlesticks, andirons and light- stands often affected the slender and graceful forms of pompeiian bronze tripods and candelabra, or were other- wise designed with classical restraint and propriety combined with much refined and charming detail (fig. ). renaissance in france, ii the outstanding names in the interior decoration and furniture of this period are, first of all, cauvet and delafosse, among the decorative designers, correspond- ing in a measure to lepautre under louis xiv and rousseau, oppenord and meissonier under louis xv; lasalle, whose figured silks and brocades, with natural- istic designs, are justly celebrated (pi. ix, ), and in furniture the great riesener, who had already, in his late works under louis xv, begun to develop the character- istics of the style of louis xvi, and fay. the ironwork of this period is particularly noteworthy. wrought iron balustrades or stair- railings and balcony- flg. .- , ™ xvi w gate. parapets came into vogue, and these, along with gates and grilles, were de- signed with remarkable grace of line, free from affecta- tion or display of technical tours-de-force in hammered foliage or intricate twists and spirals. nearly all this ironwork was wrought of bars of rectangular section, giving it a certain refined severity of aspect, and decora- tive effect was produced by the patterning of the scrolls and a moderate amount of forged and repousse orna- mentation of rosettes, wreaths and "drops" or festoons of leaves or flowers (fig. ). a history of ornament french ceramic art. it has seemed better to treat this subject as a whole, rather than to break it up into the periods under which we have studied architectural ornament. the pioneer work of palissy was briefly referred to on page ; but for the real beginnings of french ceramic art we must go a little further back. the italians who came over in with girolamo della robbia to work on the glazed terra-cotta enrichments of the chateau de madrid do not seem to have founded a lasting industry. but shortly after the beginning of their activity, about , the earliest purely french faience—that is, glazed earthenware or majolica—was made at oiron near thouars in poitou, in an establishment created by a certain helene de hengest-gouffier, and continued by her sons until its extinction in in the disorders of the huguenot wars. this oiron ware (sometimes called henri deux ware), of which the small number of authentic extant pieces are almost priceless, was glazed with an ivory ground on which the peculiar banded and interlaced decorations were executed in varying shades of brown (fig. a, c). the later pieces bear the monogram of henry ii and the triple crescents of diane de poitiers; but these were ex- tensively counterfeited in later and inferior productions. meanwhile palissy, a huguenot glass-painter and an original and self-trained naturalist, had after infinite labor and experiment succeeded in producing a white enamel ( ), and later various colored glazes, with which he adorned all sorts of vessels, especially plates and platters of great size, modeled with naturalistic t e neveix pilgrim otl)r"i*iauuiu museum. renaissance ornament in spain originality and vigor (fig. ). jn the courtyard of the casa miranda at burgos an unknown architect de- veloped a beautiful type of bracket-capital, also used in a courtyard at guadalajara (fig. ) and in the courtyard of the university of alcala de henares by rodrigo gil de hontafion. on the exterior of diego de riafio's ayunta- miento (town hall) at seville the engaged col- umns (a rare feature in exterior design) are richly carved and wreathed with festoons. arabesqued pi- lasters of great beauty also appear in this facade and on the second story of the convent of san marcos at leon, by juan de badajos ( - ; fig. ). in the longa (ex- change) at saragossa, ionic columns, treated like the columns of san zaccaria at venice (see fig. ), the lower part of the shaft serving as a sort of pedestal for the upper part, support a ribbed vault of gothic design but renaissance detail. classic columns also form the chief architectural motives of the interiors of the cathe- dral of jaen by val del vira, and of the magnificent cathedral of granada by diego de siloe (begun ). in courtyards classic columns, carrying sometimes architraves, sometimes arches, are naturally of frequent use, and many of these courtyards or patios are of great fig. .—bracket capital, guadalajara. a history of ornament decorative beauty: e.g. (besides those already men- tioned) that of the hospital of santa cruz at toledo, by de egaz; that of the lupiana monastery; those of the arch- bishop's palace at al- cala by covarrubias, of the hospital real at santiago de compos- tela by de egaz, show- ing lombard influence in the doubled bays of the second story, and of the penaranda pal- ace by francisco de colonia ( ). col- umns are quite natur- ally important elements in some of the italian tombs, as in those of the riberas in the uni- versity chapel at se- ville. an example of the frankly and purely decorative use of the orders externally is seen in the facade of the monastery at piedra in aragon, in which two superposed orders of engaged columns with ressauts or broken-out entablatures are applied as a wall-veil, with no suggestion of structural function. but this is an exceptional instance of such use of superposed orders. fio. .—part of facade op convent of san marcos, leon. renaissance ornament in spain rustications. rustications appealed to the plateresque architects not as suggestions or expressions of massive masonry, but purely as devices for surface patterning. thus the medinaceli palace (now the civic hospital) at jativa, has a facade en- tirely patterned over with grooves that outline a small-scale rustication of the masonry. the con- ception of the wall as a broad surface to be en- riched by all-over orna- ment doubtless betrays moorish influence. in the casa de las conchas at salamanca carved shells in relief are applied like nail-heads at regular in- tervals along the horizon- tal joints of the masonry; and on the infantada at guadalajara stone diamonds perform the same func- tion. rustication was also used in interiors where the masonry was exposed, especially on the supporting and flanking walls of stairways, as in the santa cruz hos- pital at toledo and in the archbishop's palace at alcala. in these and similar examples each block of the rustica- tion was treated as a panel to be ornamented by carving fig. .—decorative alcala. rustication, a history of ornament in relief (fig. ). this minute ornamentation of interior stone walls, so much more suggestive of plaster- work than of masonry, is another evidence of the power- ful though doubtless unconscious influence of moorish art. a possible italian prototype may, however, be found in the carved rustication of the palazzo pretorio, bologna. fig. .—artesonado ceiling, university, salamanca. the stairways of hospitals and palaces were made the subjects of rich decorative treatment in spain earlier than in either italy or france, if we except the circular stairways of blois and chambord. besides the carved rustications of the walls, they were adorned sometimes by carving the risers, and the balustrades were executed with especial delicacy and care. one of the most famous examples is the double stairway in the north transept of burgos cathedral, leading to a door on a higher level opening onto the street. this is the work of diego de siloe and maestro hilario, the latter a frenchman who executed the iron balustrade. wooden ceilings and cornices are a distinctive feature renaissance ornament in spain of plateresque work, especially in andalusia, where excellent pine timber abounded, and where the moorish carpihteros in spanish employ displayed consummate skill in working it. ceilings were ingeniously framed and paneled in intricate designs, and then painted and gilded with admirable decorative effect (fig. ; fig- ure ). the deep panels or cofferings, or perhaps the inverted troueh-like form of ° is ^ p. _ a. many of these ceilings, gave them the name of artesonados, from arteson, a kneading- trough. notable examples of such ceilings are those in the hospital of santa cruz, to- ledo; over stairway of pal- ace of pefiaranda de duero, in the house of the dukes of alva, seville, the archivo fw .-cornice of lonja, at barcelona and many oth- saragossa. ers. the wooden cornices of palaces and hospitals were sometimes conformed to classic models, as in the lonja of saragossa (fig. ); sometimes given a projection of several feet, casting a broad shadow beneath them, somewhat after the fashion of the wooden eaves of florence and pisa, though far more elaborate in their details of brackets and framing. both types offer fruit- ful suggestions for american use, especially in the southern states, where the climate and the still-existing forests of yellow pine provide conditions not unlike those of spain. the great merit of these spanish a history of ornament cornices is their frankly wooden character combined with monumental solidity and vigor of design. tombs. the italian tombs already referred to as being among the earliest renaissance works in spain were of two types, the wall-tomb exemplified in the ribera tombs at seville, and the floor-tombs, of which the finest example is the magnificent tomb of ferdinand and isabella in the chapel of the kings (capilla real, capilla de los reyes) in the cathedral of granada, by domenico fancelli or foncelli of florence (fig. ), who also executed the tomb of the infante don juan in san tomas at avila. the tomb of don felipe and dona juana adjoining that of ferdinand and isabella, and of the same general form and style, is by the spaniard bartolome ordonez ( ). another fine tomb of the same type is that of the cardinal tavera at toledo, in the hospital san juan bautista, a work of the versatile berruguete ( ). retablos. the retablo is the distinctively spanish type of the reredos or altarpiece, and forms in many churches the richest and most striking decorative feature of the in- terior, covering the entire eastern wall of the apse or chancel. many of the retablos are of wood, painted and gilded; a few are of stone or marble; in the chapel of the alcazar at seville is one of faience, already referred to, the work of niculoso of pisa. the retablo consists of a lofty architectural composition of pilasters, renaissance ornament in spain candelabrum-shafts, shell-capped niches and entabla- tures, all richly carved, as a framework for a multi- tude of statues, pictures and reliefs. in these works the "three arts" were thus made to collaborate on equal terms; and while one may criticize the composition, one cannot deny the beauty and delicacy of the detail nor fio. .—detail, retarlo in porlet monastery. the splendor of the general effect. notable examples are, among others, the wooden retablo in the capilla real of granada cathedral, by felipe vigarni, a bur- gundian; that in the cathedral of el pilar at sara- gossa; another in the poblet monastery at tarragona, a carved detail from which appears in fig. ; and a third in the cathedral of huesca, all three by damian forment, greatest of aragonese sculptors of the period. a history of ornament equally sumptuous with the retablos, and sometimes surpassing them in the riotous profusion and abandon of their carved ornament, are the choir-stalls or sillerias of the churches. the cathedral of saragossa has un- usually fine plateresque stalls; those of the cathedral of jaen are illustrated in figure . lack of space superposed tiers, are held in a metal frame of posts, lintels and subordinate cross-bars, the upper lintel or entablature usually surmounted by an elaborate cresting and a dominant central motive (fig. ). the posts, both those at the two ends of the screen and those flank- ing the gates, may be square or round, adorned with arabesques or faced with candelabrum-shafts; the cross- bars or transoms are of ornamental work, forged or repousse, and the entablature and cresting display fig- ures, medallions, escutcheons, arabesques and foliage of the finest hammered metalwork. the spindles are usu- ally turned with candelabrum-like swellings, collars and forbids any analysis or further discussion of these superb examples of span- ish woodwork. fio. .—detail from reja, segovia cathedral. the rejas or grilles forming the screens or clotures of chapels and chancels are quite as dis- tinctively spanish as the retablos. their general scheme is of the simplest: long slender metal spin- dles, sometimes in two renaissance ornament in spain scotise, but are otherwise unornamented, and there is an almost complete absence of the flat-bar scrolls and elaborate spiral and curved work that characterize the grilles and metal gates of all other countries during the renaissance. in these rejas the spanish appreciation of decorative effect and the spanish craftsmanship are displayed in their highest development, and the names of such famous rejeros as sandro munez, who executed the reja in the capilla mayor of seville cathedral ( - ), and maestro bartolome, who designed that between nave and transepts in the cathedral of granada ( ) and others at jaen and ubeda, are well worthy of being ranked with the architects, sculp- tors and painters of the period. classic ornament. the ornament of the griego-romano or middle renaissance style in architecture calls for no special notice. so far as it belongs to the style and is not a survival from the plateresque, it is of the stereotyped roman or palladian fashion, sober and correct, appro- priate and well-designed, but with little of the spanish exuberance and abandon. examples of the style are seen first in the palace of charles v in the alhambra, begun in by machuca but never completed; in its circular courtyard, the reliefs on the exterior, the ex- aggerated rustication, the mishandled ionic order of one of the portals, and a number of handsome paneled ceil- the painter fortuny (mariano fortuny y carbo, - *) so highly esteemed the decorative value ajid effect of the spanish rejas that he introduced them into a great number of his paintings as decorative back- grounds for his figure compositions. renaissance ornament in spain light-and-shade characteristic of this style, its curved surfaces and fantastically-broken cornices and pedi- ments, appealed to the spanish taste; not so, however, its preference for colossal orders and big and heavy de- tails. accordingly we find a certain oscillation between a rather severe classicism and an extreme restlessness of fio. .—upper part, facade op san jorge, la coruna. design. the finest baroque facade is the west front of the granada cathedral by alonso cano ( - ), a close friend of velasquez; to whom are also due the church of the magdalen and the capilla mayor of the convent del angel in the same city. other examples of the style are the facade of la pasion at valladolid and the church of san cayetano at saragossa by felipe berrejo, built between and . berrejo is cred- a history of ornament ited with the introduction of a kind of flat relief orna- ment, somewhat resembling the "applique" or "strap- work" of germany and england (see p. ). the detail from san jorge at la coruna in fig. is a belated example of the persistent baroque tradition. fio. .—portal of san andrea, valencia. the peculiar extravagances of the italian jesuit style in church interiors, with their stucco abominations of theatrical sculpture, never found favor in spain, except in the single feature of the twisted column. this un- happy innovation, made famous by bernini's monstrous bronze baldacchino in st. peter's at rome (see p. ), renaissance ornament in spain was copied, repeated and varied in churches, altarpieces and doorways (fig. ), especially during the later and distinctly spanish phase or outgrowth of the ba- roque known as the churrigueresque style. the churrigueresoo. this style, in which for nearly a century after (say) the spanish decorative fancy once more found ex- uberant and extravagantly lawless expression, receives its name from the architect josef churriguera ( - ), who with his sons and nephews after him domi- nated the architectural design of most of the th cen- tury in spain. others prominent in this development were pedro ribera, antonio tome and his sons narciso and diego, miguel de figueroa, f. manoel vasquez, jaime bort, pedro come jo and cayetano acosta. the main characteristic of this style is the use of all the resources of both classic and baroque architectural detail, with utter disregard of every rule of the classic grammar of architecture and of every consideration of structural and architectonic propriety or logic. every feature and detail was broken up, reduced to fragments, contorted and travestied, and the resulting salmagundi of caps, broken and twisted shafts, moldings, finials, brackets, triglyphs and what-not was piled together with amazing cleverness into a decorative mass which, in spite of its incoherence and seeming lack of composition, produces a distinct and powerful effect of decorative richness. it is impossible to reproduce this effect in a line drawing, however carefully detailed. figure represents, with all its fantastic complexity of detail, an a history of ornament unusually restrained example of the style; while figure from lima, peru, illustrates it as practised by the spaniards in south america. the critics, classicist and gothicist alike, are shocked by its riotous defiance of every law of architectural decency; the uninstructed layman stands amazed before it; one hardly knows whether to laugh or mourn at such misdirected skill and energy; whether most to condemn its improprieties or to admire its astonishing ingenuity. but it is true to spanish tradition, and to the persistent moorish tradi- tion, in its reduction of all decoration to a play of minute spots of light and shadow, massed in larger or smaller areas in strong contrast to other areas of perfectly plain surface, in exterior design at least. in the case of in- teriors, however, this contrast is too often lacking, the decoration of every doorway and of every altar being carried upward to the top of the structure, and often spread over the whole wall. it is evident from what has been said that there must be not a few architectural works of the late th and early th centuries which belong to the border-land between the baroque and churrigueresque develop- ments: such are, for instance, the doorway of the arch- bishop's palace at seville (figure ), and that of the church of san andrea at valencia (fig. ). the latter with its twisted columns is an evident prototype of the side portal of st. mary's at oxford. churriguera designed the towers of salamanca "new" cathedral and the town hall of the same city; the tome brothers the facade of the university of valladolid; ribera the provincial asylum at madrid; bort the facade of a history of ornament towers do not differ greatly from italian baroque types, but the doorways are thoroughly churrigueresque. this type of church front was transported to spanish america, where in the th and the th centuries the progress of colonization and the growth of population and commerce made possible the erection of costly churches in great numbers, especially those of the jesuits—the great missionary order. executed some- times in stone, often in brick or rubble and stucco, these churches show the same variation between bareness and over-decoration which is noticeable in spain; but among them are not a few of decidedly churrigueresque char- acter, as at chihuahua (mexico), tucson (ariz.), la merced church at lima, peru (figure ), the sagrario of the cathedral at mexico, and many others. the panama-pacific exhibition at san diego, california, in was an ambitious effort to adapt certain phases of the spanish renaissance architecture to the decora- tion of modern exhibition buildings. the california state building by bertram goodhue was particularly successful as an example of the possibilities of the chur- rigueresco in the hands of an able designer/' the "mission style" in california, on the other hand, represents the other extreme of simplicity, being almost entirely devoid of ornament. the accessory arts. the spanish genius for decorative design asserted itself in all the accessory and minor arts. decorative it is interesting to compare this facade and that of the chihuahua church (fig. ) with, for example, the portal of the hospicio provincial at madrid by riwra illustrated in fig. in schubert's "barockstil in spanien." renaissance ornament in spain sculpture, if we include carved ornament, was so inti- mate and essential a part of the architecture as hardly to be classed as merely accessory. woodwork was an important element in this art. the wooden retablos of many churches have already been referred to as works of architecture. worthy of being classed with them are the choir-stalls or siuenas, of which a famous example among many is that in the choir of granada cathedral by berruguete and vigarni. these, like the retablos, are composed of architectural elements, and, with all their splendor, do not call for separate discussion of their ornamental details. it was in the furniture that spanish woodwork attained a special expression distinct from the more strongly architectural works just mentioned. furniture. spanish wood-carvers never found in domestic furni- ture so rich or congenial a field as did the wood-carvers of italy, france or flanders. there is nothing in spanish movable furniture of the th and th cen- turies to compare with the splendor and exuberant decoration of the wooden retablos and choir-stalls of the churches of that period. there are no cassoni, bed- steads, credences, tables or chairs to rival those of the countries mentioned. this scarcity of furniture is easily explained. the domestic life and habits of the span- iards were until the th century still largely those of the orient, dominated by moorish traditions, which had little use for the wooden furniture required by western civilization. people generally sat, reclined, ate and slept on rugs and cushions, and stored their clothes and a history of ornament smaller belongings in small chests and leather trunks. a chair or two, framed of straight members with little or no carving, served for seats of state on formal occa- sions, with velvet or leather thrown over the back and seat. later this material was nailed permanently in place, and the nail-heads were made into ornaments and multiplied for decorative effect (pi. xi, , ). fig. .—a spanish seventeenth-century table. the earliest distinctive product of the spanish furni- ture-makers was the vargueno, which derived its name from the castilian town of vargas where it was invented and largely made. this consisted of a rectangular chest with a let-down front lid, set upon a stand. later, hinged folding doors were substituted for the lid (pi. xi, , ). the chest was at first covered with velvet or leather, adorned with openwork fittings of iron or brass; later it was of carved, paneled and inlaid wood- renaissance ornament in spain work; the stand was formed of carved supports set upon transverse foot-bars and connected by longitudinal bars and spindles, as in the illustration. the varguefio served as cabinet, chest, table and desk. it was imi- fio. .—detail of church book- fig. .—details of chip- rest. carving on spanish furniture. tated in holland (see pi . xii, ), and in england in the th century. with the progress of the th century western habits and furniture gradually drove out the primitive moor- ish customs, and chairs, cabinets and tables came into general use, and were made after french and flemish models modified by the spanish taste. there is nothing new or original in the ornamental details of most of this a history of ornament furniture; the spanish character appears rather—if at all—in their general style. there were, however, cer- tain spanish innovations and peculiarities. iron was sometimes used for decorative braces in chairs and tables, and pi. xi, , shows a chair of considerable ele- gance made entirely of iron. the use of decorative nail-heads also continued, and leather was employed much more widely than in any other european country. stamped leather, in- deed, was a highly im- portant and distinctive spanish product. the art was, like so much else in spain, an in- heritance from the moors. two methods of decoration were employed: stamping and gilding. for the first, the leather, soft- ened by soaking, was pressed or hammered into or upon wooden molds. for the second it was smeared with an oily paste over which gold leaf was spread. heated metal stamps, with the desired ornament embossed upon them, were pressed upon the gold leaf, which was thereby made to adhere to the leather, after which the superfluous gold-leaf and cement were washed or scraped away. the pattern in both cases was often enhanced by applying color to the background. the patterns used, while chiefly derived from renaissance sources—scrolls, acanthus leaves and fig. .—araric and moorish lhy mo- tives: (o, b) from cairo; (c) from alhamrra. renaissance ornament in spain the like,—frequently betray moorish motives, such as the moorish or arabic lily (see fig. ), certain forms of quarry-mesh and diaper-treatment, and leaf-forms common in all the moslem decorative styles (see p. and figs. , ). the decoration of these leathers was usually broad and bold in design (pi. xi, ). cor- dova was the greatest center of this branch of art, which however has become en- tirely extinct in spain. this branch of decora- tive art, like many oth- ers, was carried to the netherlands and there practiced with great suc- cess (see pi. xii). spanish textiles are less important than the leathers. lace-making was introduced in the th century, most prob- ably from flanders, but never attained the importance it reached in flanders and italy. the richest of the spanish textiles are the velvets, decorated with patterns in applique and enriched with needlework in gold and silver thread (fig. ). renaissance tiles, although belonging to a branch of* art distinctly oriental in origin, show less of moorish patterning than might have been expected. the moors learned the ceramic art from the persians, and the spaniards from the moors. the name majolica is de- fio. .—patterned tiles. fio. .—single-motive or one-color tiles. fio. .—iron window-grille. fio. . — emrroidered wall-hanging, red on white, toledo town hall. a history of ornament be painted upon it in enamel pigments of various colors (fig. ). the latter kind of tiles gradually super- seded the first kind, and constitute the chief part of the tile-work in the buildings of the spanish renaissance and in museum collections. they are usually of a some- what coarse earthenware, covered with a slip or glaze of enamel in color, and designed with great skill as to both pattern and details. fig. represents a characteristic bit of the minor ironwork of spain; figs. - three examples of spanish needlework and embroidery, an art in which, as above stated, the spaniards produced sumptuous effects, especially on velvet. lack of space forbids any adequate illustration of this phase of spanish art, in which, however, the details employed were not essen- tially different from those of renaissance art generally in this and allied fields. books recommended: byne and stapley: spanish architecture of the sixteenth century (putnam, new york, ); rejeria of the spanish renaissance (the hispanic society, new york, ); spanish ironwork (the hispanic society, new york, ); decorated wooden ceilings in spain (putnam, new york, ) ; spanish interiors and furniture (helburn, new york, ) .—caveda (tr. kugler): geschichte der baukunst in spanien (ebner & seubert, stuttgart, ).—w. r. emer- son: the architecture and furniture of the spanish colonies (polley, boston, ).—a. haupt: baukunst der renais- sance in portugal (keller, frankfort, ).—junghaendel und gurlitt: die baukunst spaniens (bleyl, dresden, ). —monumentos arquitectonicos de espana (fortenet, madrid). —a. n. p rentice' renaissance architecture and ornament in spain (batsford, london, ).—o. schurert: barockstil in renaissance ornament in spain spanien (neff, esslingen, ).—c. uhde: baudenkmaeler in spanien (wasmuth, berlin, ).—villa amil: espana artistica y monumental (hauser, paris, ).—a. whittle- sey: the renaissance architecture of central and northern spain (arch. b'k pub. co., new york, ). chapter ix kenaissance ornament in the netherlands the netherlands. holland and belgium are modern names, both geo- graphically and politically. in the sixteenth century, when the renaissance began to invade the low coun- tries or netherlands, entering by various channels from italy, both directly and through germany and france, the greater part of modern belgium belonged to the dukes of burgundy, and was thus nominally an ap- panage or province of france (artois and flandre). the eastern portion of belgium and the whole of hol- land belonged to spain, as a part of the holy roman empire under charles v and his successors, until the revolt and establishment of the dutch republic in . situated thus between germany and france, inhabited by three races—hollanders, flemings and walloons, speaking dutch, flemish and french—owing allegiance at first one part to spain and the other to france, and later divided into the three dominions of the dutch re- public, of the empire under spain, and of burgundy under france, the low countries developed neverthe- less a robust and characteristic art, which if not by any means uniform in the various provinces, was far less chaotic and diversified than might have been expected. there is a certain similarity in the architecture of all ornament in the netherlands the lowlands of this region, whether in holland or in what is now belgium, due to similarity of conditions, the^ lack of stone and consequent use of brick for build- ing, and the development of wood-carving in regions where stone was scarce and marble wholly wanting. all this region was more .german than french in its taste, the rhine forming a main channel for cultural influ- ences. western belgium (flanders), possessing a more varied topography, with moderate hills, valleys and abundant building-stone, and being adjacent to burgundy with its splendid monuments of the middle ages, had developed a more imposing and varied archi- tecture in the th and th centuries, and a richer and more prolific decorative art. the splendid achieve- ments of the flemish textile industry and art beginning in the fourteenth century and immensely extended in the fifteenth, when bruges was the most important sea- port of northern europe, continued through the whole of the th and th centuries. flemish architectural ornament. in this field belgium has little to show that is remark- able for originality or splendor. the high decorative skill shown in the late gothic civic buildings of the flemings, and still more conspicuously in minor works like choir-screens and tombs, seems to have declined with the loss of their civic liberties, and the renaissance made apparently little appeal to their imagination. the classic spirit calls for breadth, repose, emphasis of horizontality, a certain largeness of detail and expres- sion. the flemish taste was always for the minute, a history of ornament for the animated breaking up of surfaces, for multiplied and crowded detail. hence the stepped gables, the small orders, the crowded windows, the too slender sup- ports between them, producing in many cases an im- pression of structural weakness and instability, as in the renaissance portion of the town hall at ghent (figure ), and in many of the guild-houses. except the dignified but monotonous town hall of antwerp there was not a single renaissance building of com- manding size erected in belgium. the baroque style with its restlessness was more in the flemish vein than the purer phases of neoclassic architecture. such a facade as that of st. pierre at louvain illustrates the skill with which the flemings handled its decorative possibilities; but they were at the same time corrupted by its more vicious tendencies, and most of the flemish jesuit interiors are as bad as the italian. in minor works, however, they were more successful than in monumental architecture. the great chimney- pieces in the town halls of bruges and louvain are un- deniably fine, although not free from the flemish tendency to redundance. they do not, however, like spanish works of the same class, display any distinctive novelty of detail or of composition. belgium created nothing like the spanish plateresque. these tendencies and characteristics are displayed in a great number of choir-screens, sacrament-shrines, altars, pulpits and tombs, all exhibiting excellent work- manship, but lacking the dignity, order and balance of the best italian work. the great sacrament-shrine from the church at leau, for instance, from whose hand- ornament in the netherlands some enclosing railing the detail shown in fig. is taken, although designed by the architect of the ant- werp town hall, de vriendt ( ), is singularly monotonous in the repetition of identical motives in the ten stories of its height of feet. in wood-carving the flemings were notably success- ful, combining fineness of execution with boldness of fig. .—altar-rail from church at leau, belgium. cutting, and attained especial reputation in furniture. we have already seen how important an element they contributed to the early development of french furni- ture (see pp. , , , ). flemish wood- carvers carried their art to elizabethan england, and in the late th century grinling gibbons was sent to flanders to perfect himself in that art, in which he became the greatest in england. but even in this art a history of ornament it was craftsmanship that made the flemish reputa- tion, rather than originality or creativeness in detail. the flemish character appears rather in the total effect and the execution than in the novelty or deli- cacy of the motives and details. (fig. .) there is notice- able, especially in the furniture, a fond- ness for the intro- duction of the hu- man figure, which was modeled and carved with great skill. in the earlier renais- sance wood-carving the minuteness of the detail, the sparkle of the composition and the effective handling of the relief strongly suggest french influ- ence by their resem- blance to francis i work. in the th century there arose a rio. .—wooden panel, audenarde. j new school of realistic wood-carvers or rather wood-sculptors, who executed an extraordinary series of pulpits in antwerp, brussels, ghent, louvain and other cities. in these the extreme of virtuosity in the minutely realistic representation of ornament in the netherlands figures, clothing, draperies, vegetation and common objects, combined with an equally remarkable boldness in the construction, was held to be the highest form of art, to the detriment of all the higher qualities of true art. these works belong more properly in the domain of sculpture than of ornament, and require no further mention. flemish furniture. in furniture, which does not call for the higher proprieties of design requisite in architecture, the ex- fio. .—flemish chest and credence. cellent craftsmanship of the flemish woodworkers found free scope. the primary inspiration in their designs doubtless came from italy, but so mingled with elements a history of ornament from spain and germany that it is not always easy to distinguish work of flemish design from that of these fio. — flemish tarle. countries. there is much use of gaines and of human figures and a tendency to overloaded decoration, and a species of arch-motive, probably derived from spain, is fio. .—nielle ornament from furniture. not uncommon; in the later renaissance turned and twisted spindles and connecting-bars appear in chairs ornament in the netherlands and tables. the technical skill of the flemish furniture- makers led to their employment*in foreign lands; in france, as we have already seen (see p. ), and in england under elizabeth and james i. a few illus- trations of flemish furniture are given in figs. - , figures , , and pi . xii. flemish textiles. the highest achievements of flemish renaissance art were attained in the fields of painting, which is out- side of our purview, and of textiles, in certain depart- ments of which, both as an industry and as an aft, flanders surpassed all other countries of europe. in the weaving of tapestries even italy and france were obliged to depend largely upon the skill of the flemish weavers for the execution, if not also the design, of the great woven pictures with which they were fain to deco- rate their palace walls, and it was flemings who taught the art to the italians and the french. the flemish lacemakers were of almost equal repute with the tapes- try-weavers, and in this gentle and exquisite art have retained their reputation to the present time, though with no such monopoly of superior skill as they once possessed. the origins of the art of tapestry-weaving are not easy to specify, because of the difficulty of determining at what exact point tapestries should be differentiated from other kinds of figured weaves or from needlework pictures like the famous bayeux "tapestry" of the th century. technically, tapestries are not woven; that is, the threads of the woof are not carried continuously a history of ornament across the whole width of the fabric and then returned; the thread of any given color in the design is carried across only as far as that color extends, often across only two or three threads of the chain or warp, and then knotted; the weaver confines himself to a breadth or relay of or inches in width; and the threads of the woof are "thrown" by means of a "broche" instead of a shuttle. the oldest european tapestries are fragments from the church of st. gereon at cologne, dating from the th or th century; other very old fragments are from halberstadt and quedlinburg in germany. early in the th century the art had be- come established in arras in french flanders, where a certain isabeau caurree is known to have worked in ; by the name "arras" had come into general use to signify a tapestry; and during the following cen- tury the weavers not only of arras but also of ypres, brussels and antwerp were developing the art to its highest perfection. the subjects were generally scrip- tural and religious, based on the pictorial illuminations of manuscripts, and were treated with a flatness and simplicity befitting woven mural decorations. with the advent of the renaissance there came a change not only in the character of the subjects but also in the manner of their treatment. the progress of painting naturally led to a more pictorial and realistic representation of life, while the secularizing influence of the renaissance movement and of the revival of classical learning brought about a general substitution of histori- cal and mythological in place of scriptural subjects, although these were also sometimes favored. for the ornament in the netherlands palaces and villas of the italian nobility the great paint- ers of the italian renaissance designed series of decora- tive mural compositions which were sent to arras or brussels to be executed. flemish weavers studied de- sign in italy; thus bernhard van orley, after studying under raphael, returned to arras to weave eleven tapes- tries from cartoons by his master of scenes from the new testament for the sistine chapel (see ante, fig. ); these were finished in . giulio romano, andrea del sarto, titian and other great painters likewise de- signed cartoons to be woven in flanders. four of giulio romano's set of scenes from the life of scipio, woven in brussels, are in new york; eight of his abra- ham set are in hampton court palace. not all the great sets of mural tapestries of the th century, how- ever, were designed by foreigners; the celebrated "tunis" tapestries woven by wilhelm pannemaker for charles v were from cartoons by a fleming, vermey- ren, and doubtless the majority of the tapestries, ex- clusive of these great monumentally important sets, were of flemish design as well as execution. nevertheless, the influence of this invasion of italian art was on the whole deleterious. it introduced a false standard of excellence in tapestry design in its textual reproduction of pictorial painting, and in its total sepa- ration of design from execution. the weaver became more and more a clever workman instead of a creative artisan. the th-century flemish tapestries are dis- tinguished by their soft harmonies of color and by the flat, mural character of their portrayal of scenes, as decorative in their way as byzantine mosaics and per- a history of ornament fectly adapted to the medium in which they were exe- cuted. the th and th century tapestries, on the other hand, are brilliantly executed copies of paintings, or original designs absolutely in the style of painted decorations, framed or bordered with conventional wreaths of fruit and foliage, or with architectural orna- ments, all rendered with full light-and-shade and bril- liant color so as to produce as real an effect of relief as possible. while this is less objectionable on a wall than in a floor-rug or carpet, it marks a decline from that higher art in which the design, the technic and the medium are all three in perfect harmony and dependent one on the other. during the th century "verdure" tapestries came increasingly into vogue for the walls of chateaux and fine city houses. these were large panels representing trees and shrubbery or forest scenes or partly wooded landscapes, and hence of a predominantly green tone. such tapestries could be woven for the general market; at least they did not require the services of great paint- ers for their design, and are more characteristically flemish than many of the more famous pictorial pieces. they are therefore highly esteemed and widely imitated to-day. it will have been observed by the reader that we have said but little of the specific ornament-forms of these tapestries. from its very nature and purpose this art was chiefly pictorial, and developed almost nothing in the line of distinctive conventional ornament. this section would therefore have been made much shorter but for the relation of this whole branch of flemish art ornament in the netherlands to the decorative art of italy and even more of france during the th and th centuries, as already indicated on previous pages. flemish laces. the art of lace-making is almost entirely a product of the renaissance, although its origin is to be sought in the various forms in which needlework was applied before the sixteenth century to the decoration of em- broidered fabrics by the nuns in the convents of italy. the first stage in its evolution was the cutting of decora- tive openings in the fabric, which were then buttonholed around the edges and crossed by threads so intertwined and interlaced as to produce delicate patterns in the openings. the next stage was the execution of such thread patterns with the needle independently of cut openwork, producing real "needlepoint" or "point" lace, of which italy seems to have been the first pro- ducer early in the th century. "pillow" or "bobbin" lace, on the other hand, originated in flanders, also in the early th century. in this kind of work the pattern is drawn on parchment or paper stretched over a pillow or cushion; pins are inserted along the lines of the pat- tern and the design worked by means of a large number of threads wound on bobbins and twisted over the pins and around one another. but the belgians by no means confined themselves to pillow lace; brussels point or guipure rivals in beauty the valenciennes pillow lace, and mechlin point is equally famous. while the earliest laces of the th century were de- signed by the women who wrought them, and bear the a history of ornament character of designs developed out of the process of their making, the later laces, those of the th and th centuries, betray increasingly the influence of archi- tectural ornament in the use of scrolls, rinceaux, acanthus leaves and the like. one may divide the pat- terns into two general classes: those in which the design of flowing lines is wrought upon a background of fine fio. .—brussels point-lace, eighteenth century. network, as in brussels and mechlin guipure (fig. ); and that in which there is no such background, the design forming an openwork pattern. to enumer- ate and discuss the great variety of ornament motives of the flemish laces would require an amount of tech- nical explanation and illustration far beyond the allow- able limits of a general work like this; the inquiring student must be referred to special books on the subject, two or three of which are mentioned in the list of books recommended at the end of this chapter. ornament in the netherlands dutch renaissance ornament. the dutch developed no great architecture, either in the gothic or the renaissance styles. the republic of the netherlands did not attain independence until , and it was not until years later that spain finally acknowledged this independence; and the long subjection to spain before this, and the close relations of protestant holland thereafter with the protestant states of germany combined to prevent the develop- ment of any great and independent style in the nether- lands. moreover both the lack of stone, which restricted architecture to construction in brick, and the national taste and requirements tended towards a modest and domestic quality in the dutch buildings, whose pic- turesqueness of composition and quaintness of detail are not without charm. such ornament as they display suggests a dominant german influence, seen in the fio. .—garle ornament, leyden. a history of ornament the netherlands, and it is from the minor arts of germany rather than of holland that this sort of ornament was derived. jan vredeman de vries, who died in , and his son paul, who lived till about , were the lepautres of the netherlands, and published collections of designs for furniture and interior decora- fio. .—doorway decoration ry paul v. de vries. tion, from which figs. and are taken. in these somewhat extravagant designs, which were apparently never executed, baroque and german elements, gaines, escutcheons or cartouches, strapwork and architectural "jewels" are combined in fantastic fashion (fig. ). in the th century dutch furniture, like that of italy, spain, england and germany, underwent the french influence, and the wavy lines, the swelling fronts, the applied ornaments of gilt bronze and the lacquers and ornament in the netherlands veneers of the french styles were imitated with more or less success in the netherlands. typographic ornament was highly developed by the dutch printers, especially in the th century, not only in the design of decorative initials, but even more not- ably in head-pieces, tail-pieces and borders (fig. ). the dutch engravers attained distinction, and there were published in holland, as in france, pattern-books fio. .—typographic ornaments ry elzevir, . of ornament for the use of painters, carvers, architects and jewelers, for the most part reflecting the italian baroque taste, like that of vredeman de vries for furniture, already mentioned. the same general style appears in the book-bindings, jewel-cases and similar small works in wood, ivory, leather and metal which holland produced and exported in considerable quan- tities, especially to england, where the dutch influence was considerable. to the artists who designed and executed these minor works the general name of "little masters" (petits maitres) has been applied by the a history of ornament french; in contradistinction, of course, to the great masters of art, to whose ranks the dutch contributed several names of distinction, and one, at least, of the very highest order in rembrandt van ryn. ceramics. when dutch ceramics are mentioned, one im- mediately thinks of delft; and quite justly, for delft was the chief and almost the only important center of this art. it is interesting to note that it was not until that the ceramic industry was first established at delft by her- mann pietersz; by the middle of the next century the delft wares had become famous, and by the end of the century the town had become the center of a very extensive and pros- perous manufacturing and ex- port trade in these wares. a powerful influence in this de- velopment was the guild of st. luke, founded in , which included artists of all kinds, and exercised a rigid fio. ,-dei^t tiies, seven- contl. l over both the qualifi- teeijth century. * cations of its members and the quality of their productions. the earlier ceramic wares of delft show a rather complex decoration of pictorial ornament in the netherlands scenes and conventional or naturalistic floral ornament, executed in blue. after the ware is finer, imitat- ing the oriental porcelains and copying in its decora- tion chinese and japanese models, holland having by that time established a colony in japan, while chinese art, as we have already seen, was entering into euro- pean commerce and affecting french as well as dutch fio. .—delft faience, plate and ewer. art. reygens, keyzer and pynaker are leading names in this period. by the end of the century delft was producing an extraordinary variety of shapes and styles of platters,, bowls, table-ware and druggists' vessels, besides flat tiles for fireplaces, "porcelain" stoves and walls. in the decoration of these varied objects the famous delft blue predominates, but with some yellow, red and other colors. the ornamentation includes floral forms, escutcheons and cartouches, scrolls and figures, espe- a history of ornament cially in the chinese and japanese imitations. any adequate illustration of the delft wares would require far more space than can be afforded in a work like this; figs. , may serve to show something of the character of their decoration. books recommended: g. von bezold: die baldwinst der renaissance in deutsch- land, holland, belgien und danemark ( bergstrasser, stuttgart, ).—f. boutron: l'architecture aux pays-bas (schmid, paris, ).—f. ewerbeck: die renaissance in belgien und holland (seemann, leipzig, ).—g. gauland: geschichte der hollandischen bauktmst und bildnerei . . . der renaissance (keller, -frankfort, ).—a. jolles: architektur und kunstgewerbe in alt-holland (miiller, munich, ).—moke and others: la belgique monumentale etc. (jaman, brussels, .—a. g. b. schayes: histoire de varchitecture en bel- gique (wasmuth, brussels, ).—f. strorant: monuments d'architecture et de sculpture (brussels, ).—j. van ysendyck: la belgique monumentale (nijhoff, the hague, ) ; documents classes de vart dans les pays-bas (maes, antwerp, ).—p. vredeman de vbies: plusieurs menul- series etc. (brussels, n. d.). chapter x renaissance ornament in germany the renaissance invasion. germany had been slow in the th century to receive and assimilate the gothic style from france: she showed herself equally slow to receive and assimilate the italian renaissance influence in the th. the first invasion of that influence was by way of southeastern germany, the tyrol and bohemia, where italian architects were employed in the later years of the th and early years of the tn century. the schloss stern, the schalaburg castle on the danube, the belvedere and waldstein palace at prague, the schloss ambras at innsbruck, and the chapel of the jagellons at cracow are among these early renaissance buildings in austro-german territory by italian architects—paolo della stella, valentino di lira, giovanni marini and others. the style spread gradually through germany, but it was not until the peace of augsburg ( ) that the adop- tion of the new style began to be at all general, so far, at least, as architecture was concerned. in the minor arts it had made more rapid progress, through the in- fluence of italian painting and especially of the work of the italian typographers and engravers. it must be remembered that, during the years preceding the treaty of augsburg, germany—that is s a history of ornament a large part of the german states as well as bohemia —was in the throes of the religious and political up- heaval accompanying the protestant reformation. the reformation itself was one of the fruits of the spirit of independent inquiry set free by the renaissance movement, and it was this, the intellectual and religious phase of the movement rather than the artistic, that took hold of the german consciousness. it was hardly to be expected that during such a period of turmoil there should have been any great and general artistic activity. facade decoration. two influences long prevented the adoption in ger- many of any system of design at all resembling the flat facades and rectangular flat-roofed masses of italian classical architecture.' these were first, the'fact that nearly all the earlier renaissance castles or palaces in germany were built on the foundations of irregularly- planned medieval castles; and secondly, the german preference for the picturesque and even the fantastic alike in mass, skyline and detail, with broken surfaces, varied play of light and shade and crowded detail. thus in a single exterior, that of the castle of giistrow, there are five varieties of rustication, three types of tower or turret, and a broken and tumultuous skyline, all as far removed as possible from the breadth, simplicity and repose of classical design. when, however, a new erec- tion on a more formal plan offered plane surfaces for treatment, the fantastic german taste often introduced 'germany in the th century was not a political unit, but a group of small states owing a common allegiance to the "holy roman empire" of charles v and philip ii. ornament in germany into their design singular irregularities of spacing and a studied disregard of symmetry and superposition, as in the curious facade of the fiirstenhof at wismar and the court-facades of the schloss plassenburg. the two most important renaissance palace facades in germany are those of the otto-heinrichsbau ( ) and friedrichsbau ( ) forming two wings of the castle of heidelberg. both are in ruins, having been burned in and again in ; both are straight facades, originally topped each with two great dormer- gables adorned with statues, but the friedrichsbau dormers are the only ones now standing. in spite of the difference of date there is a strong similarity of general style between them, and many details of one recall those of the other, though the friedrichsbau is the more robust of the two. the substitution of niches for pilasters in alternate bays, the use of gaines as mullions and the fantastic rustications are typical of the german renaissance down to or later (fig. ). architectural ornament: the orders. the classic orders were introduced into architectural design only, as it were, under protest, and with modifi- cations which amounted often to a travesty of the classic originals, both as to proportion and as to detail. the colonnade as such does not appear until the classic revival of the th century; except in rare instances, the free column was used only in columnar arcades in courtyards and in porches, or on a small scale as a purely ornamental detail in pulpits, shrines and sedilia. as an example of the fantastic proportions of the a history of ornament fio. .—part of facade, ottd-heinrichsrau, heidelrerg. ornament in germany columns and the utter disregard of the classic or palladian canons of design we may cite the court arcade of the mint (miinzengebaude) at munich, and by ex- ceptional contrast the very palladian arcade of the fig. .—columns from portals op rathaus, munden, and castle of aschaffenburo. courtyard of the residenz at landshut. the most frequent occurrence of columns is in entrance portals, where they may be either free or engaged, flanking the entrance archway and carrying an entablature or pedi- ment (fig. ). such columns are usually more mas- a history of ornament sive than the classic type and have corinthianesque capitals; they are seldom fluted but frequently have the lower portion carved in relief, as was often done in italy and sometimes in spain (fig. ). in the porch of the rathaus (town hall) of cologne ( ) we have the anomaly of pointed arches with classic archivolts and keystones, between de- tached corinthianesque columns carry- ing an inordinately heavy bracketed entablature. doric and ionic col- umns occur but rarely. rusticated and fantastically banded columns are quite frequent. gables and dormers. the high steep roof is a necessity of fio. i. —carvino a\ northern climates, and the dormer on lower half of . . column, bevern. window is its natural accompaniment. we have seen how the french renais- sance treated both features, eschewing the high gable in favor of various types of hipped roof, and developing the dormer into a subordinate rather than a dominant feature after the francis i-henry ii period (see fig. ; pi. vii, ). the germans, on the other hand, as well as the dutch and flemings, preferred gabled to hipped roofs, and made of the gable a dominant feature, and of the dormer a feature second only to the gable in importance. gables and dormers alike were carried through two or three and even four stories, with succes- sive steppings decorated with curves, scrolls, obelisks ornament in germany and finials, and their facades treated with pilasters and entablatures in small orders for each story (figs. , ). peculiarly german was the occasional disposi- fio. .—garle, state pharmacy, saalfeld. tion of openings over pilasters and pilasters over open- ings (fig. ), producing that effect of interruption^ and variation which the germans cultivated in their preference of decorative animation to repose. obelisks frequently adorned the steps of the gable, as in fig. . a history of ornament doors and windows. german entrance portals deserve more notice than the brief reference to them on page , which relates only to the use of columns to flank the openings. they fig. .—dormer, hamtelschenrurg castle. were in the earlier stages of the renaissance of very varied type, but were generally arched and broad in proportion to their height, giving them often an air of "squatness" hardly met with elsewhere. carved decora- ornament in germany tion was usually abundant and figure sculpture is, not uncommon. but there is nothing to compare with the beauty and dignity of the italian doorways, or the sumptuous but refined decoration of those of spain. such a wildly extravagant work as the door to the golden hall of the schloss at buckeburg recalls the lawless exuberance of the spanish churrigueresque of the next century. it is amazingly clever techni- cally but utterly destitute of architectural propriety (figure ), and illus- trates a characteristic of german architecture gen- erally—the exaltation of technical cleverness and artistic tours de force above finer qualities of design. german renaissance windows are as varied as the doors, and few among them conform to any italian or classic type. those, for instance, of the bremen town hall ( ) have no architrave or frame whatever, and their weak pedi- ments seem to rest on a void. the gaine-mullioned windows of heidelberg have already been referred to; another type is seen in the liebfrauenkirche of wiirz- ~ -iiif"' ma nir-" fio. .—window, house at dinkelsrohl. a history of ornament burg, while fig. shows still another from a half- timbered house at dinkelsbuhl, dated . carving and sculpture. german architectural relief-carving .was based, as was natural, upon the traditional italo-classic motives, fig. .—strapwohjc or fig. .—carving, stalls appliaufi ornament of chapel in mayence marienkirche, ror- cathedral, tock. but, as in the case of the orders, the germans developed a peculiar treatment of their own. the most notable element in this treatment was the evolution of patterns in flat relief, suggesting ornament cut out of a sheet of some material and attached to the surface to be decorated (fig. ). this ornament was evidently a transference to carving in stone of patterns and effects ornament in germany produced in sheet-iron ornaments on chests and other woodwork, and in ornament applied to jewel-boxes, book-covers and the like, by means of patterns cut out of sheets of leather or metal or thin pjeces of wood or- ivory and affixed to the object with nails, screws or rivets. the origin of this form of decoration was probably oriental, perhaps by way of moorish spain fig. .—carving, portal of gymnasium (school) at corlenz. (see p. ). in carving these patterns in stone, how- ever, additional decorative effect was produced by fillet- ing the edges of the relief pattern, and sometimes by curling up the ends or introducing minor details carved in "round" relief (fig. ). this sort of ornament is commonly called "strap- work"; a more correct designation would be flat relief or appliqut ornament. it spread from germany to holland and, in the second half of the th century, to a history of ornament england (see p. ). an additional illustration of this sort of detail is given in fig. . not all architectural carving was of this character; round and varied relief more after the traditions of italo-classic art was also j frequently used with con- siderable skill. the de- tail and execution were apt to be better than the composition, which often lacked unity of scale and due subordination of one part or element to an- other. bands of carved decoration of equal width and importance were jux- taposed, vertically or hor- izontally (rathaus at bremen, piastenschloss at brieg, etc.), and one sel- dom finds the refined deli- cacy and judicious dispo- sition of the carved orna- ment of the plateresque of spain, of the french renaissance or of the quattrocento and cinquecento of italy (fig. ). in the applications of sculpture to decoration, whether in architecture or furniture, realism and a cer- tain teutonic humor often verging on the grotesque are constantly in evidence. the figures over the door- "fig. .—carvings from nurem- rero, ; lead-work, six- teenth century. ornament in germany way of the highly ornamented facade of the piasten- schloss at brieg illustrate the first of these character- istics; of the second one could not ask a more emphatic example than the doorway of the furstenhof at wismar (figure ). here the biblical tales of delilah and samson on one side and of david and goliath on the other, are intended to symbolize the triumph of intellect over brute strength. the humor of the treatment here is not that of primitive naivete but of intentional grotesquery. interior decoration. there is no such relation between painting and decoration in germany as in italy, and the germans never developed any important art of mural painting during the renaissance, although in the pictorial art of painting they achieved notable results. beginning with schongauer this art was developed to a high level of dignity and excellence by such artists as albert diirer, burgkmair, the two holbeins, lucas cranach and others; but although the younger holbein designed goldsmith's work and ceilings for henry viii of eng- land, none of the german painters executed mural paintings of importance that have survived, either secular or ecclesiastical. not a single church of first- rate size or of great architectural importance was built in germany during the entire renaissance period, and until the latter part of the th century there were but few erected even of second rank. the religious upheaval of the reformation doubtless accounts in large measure for this; but whatever the cause, the result was to de- a history of ornament prive german decorative art of the powerful stimulus and the splendid opportunities offered by the church in italy and spain, and in a less degree in france also. as in holland and belgium, decorative effect in church interiors was sought rather in the furniture and ad- juncts than in the architecture itself. in the castles and town halls also this was true to a certain extent, and where decoration was sought in architectural interiors it was rather by purely archi- tectural means than by stucco-relief and painting after the italian fashion; by pilasters, wainscoting, and door- trim, and above all by the decoration of ceilings. ceilings. these were less varied in type and treatment than those of italy, france or spain. the dome and the coved ceiling hardly occur at all until after the mid- seventeenth century. barrel-vaults with penetrations cover some of the large halls and chambers of castles and town halls, and these are generally painted on the plaster, in a style peculiar to the country, less easily described than illustrated. a very fine early renais- sance barrel-vaulted ceiling is that of the schloss ambras, by an italian architect, recalling by its paneled decoration that of the hall of the palazzo del te at mantua (see p. ). another paneled barrel-vault is that of the church of st. michael at munich by w. miiller. the majority however of german renaissance ceil- ings are flat ceilings, coffered and paneled and painted and gilded, somewhat after the fashion of the italian ornament in germany ceilings of the middle renaissance (see p. ), but almost invariably heavier in design and detail, and without the great picture-panels which are the glory of many italian ceilings, especially in rome and venice. the ceilings of heiligenburg castle (figure ), of the golden hall of the rathaus at augsburg, and of the castle of biickeburg are examples of this; the main beams of the last named ceiling are over six feet deep. the german baroque. it was inevitable that the bizarre and sensational effects of the italian baroque style should appeal to the german taste for the fantastic in art. it must be remembered that the date , which marks the begin- ning of the general adoption of renaissance forms in german architecture, fell in the period of the greatest activity of palladio and michel angelo, when the first symptoms of the change from the mid-renaissance classic reserve to the baroque were showing themselves. the development of german renaissance architecture therefore, so far as it was affected by contemporary italian influence, received that influence from the work of maderna, bernini, borromini, martino lunghi, longhena, and other baroque masters, so that, given the german dislike of classic restraint, it is not surpris- ing that eventually german architecture surpassed even the italian in fantastic freedom and eccentricity of de- sign. in catholic germany there was, during the late th century and throughout the th, a considerable activity in the building of jesuit churches and monas- teries, reflecting the influence of the catholic counter- ornament in germany museum, on which he spent five years of labor, aided by a painter, a sculptor and a jeweler. french in- fluence became especially strong in the th century. in one respect the germans were more consistent than the french, though less judicious in taste, for in at least one instance they applied the louis-quinze- rococo style to a monumen- tal exterior—the zwinger palace at dresden, now a museum (figure ). this remarkable edifice by pop- pelmann, thoroughly classic in its monumental plan, is completely rococo in every detail, suggesting the exub- erant splurge of churriguera but with none of the chur- rigueresque absurd shatter- ing and confusion of detail. it is theatrical, extravagant, but artistically consistent. the belvedere and schwarz- enberg palaces at vienna show something of the same rococo detail, but in a more sober fashion and with more of the italian baroque spirit. a singular characteristic of the german th and th century decorative treatment of exteriors is the "topping-out" of towers and turrets, both of churches and civil buildings, which is often singularly fantastic fio. .—german towar- torrings. a history of ornament even when the main mass of the tower is sober or elegant. many of these decorative spires are bulbous with turnip-shaped silhouettes that suggest russia rather than western europe; or that look more like exaggerated finials to chair-posts or bed-posts than monumental structures (fig. ). the minor arts. whatever the german deficiencies may have been in the composition and decoration of monumental archi- fio. .—german gaines from a mantel in i.ureck; heidelrerg castle; monument at pforzheim; national museum, munich. tecture, in the minor arts the germans achieved some remarkable results. their craftsmanship was always of a high order, and craftsmanship counts for much in the minor ai ts. the german patience, love of minute detail and high standard of workmanship made the ornament in germany german craftsmen past masters, in ornament, in the carving of wood and ivory, in the chasing, hammering and embossing of metal, in the making alike of furni- ture and armor, and in all the arts connected with books. in the more architectural forms of the minor arts, such as choir-stalls, shrines, pulpits and monuments in churches, the faults of german architecture are blended fig. .—lower part of an etched bowl, seventeenth century. with the excellences of german workmanship and of the undeniable feeling for decorative effect in even the most extravagant baroque and rococo aberrations of ger- man design. the same is true of the furniture. the germans were particularly fond of the gaine, which they introduced into every possible combination, and developed with considerable decorative and imaginative skill (fig. ). in metalwork they were conspicuously successful, particularly in the making of arms and armor, in which they rivaled the italians (figure ). the magnificent collection in the metropolitan museum at new york a history of ornament is especially rich in examples of teutonic skill and taste in this art. the germans were consum- mate engravers, always more successful in decorative line than in decorative mass, and their suits of armor for man and horse, their halberds and swords, and later their cannons, pistols and carbines, as well as smaller fio. .— (a) etched tin plate, seventeenth century; (b) iron chest, sixteenth century. objects in metal, even tin plates, were etched and en- graved with patterns of great richness, in which the rinceau, acanthus and symbolic grotesques were com- bined with admirable decorative effect (figs. , ). fig. shows a carved ivory dagger-sheath of the th century. goblets, ewers and other vessels of silver were made of considerable richness of design in embossed orna- ment, though too often lacking in simplicity and purity of outline (fig. ). in ironwork, gates and grilles ornament in germany for windows and fanlights were wrought often with round bars, unlike the italian and french work which was usually of flat bars (figures , ). the patterns show frequent use of interlaced and crossed bars, with fig. .—carved ivory fio. .—late sixteenth- daoger-sheatr. century silver gorlet. less of spiral scrolls and flowing curves than was com- mon in italy and france (fig. ). this is true of the pre-baroque work, at least; in the th century the patterns were freer and more elaborate and intricate, following the lead of the french louis quinze style rather than of the italian (figure ). fig. a history of ornament shows a grille of the th century from hungary, with much fiat cut-out work. in the th and th centuries nuremberg was an important center for decorative flat ironwork applied to chests, locks and other movable objects, in patterns fig. .—two fan-lights, from nuremrerg town hall, and salt house at frankfort. cut out in sheet metal and chased or engraved with line- ornament, in which oriental influence appears. the nuremberg products were widely distributed and imi- tated throughout germany. the peculiar leaf and scroll details in fig. are unquestionably of arabic or turkish origin, but by what particular channel they t ornament in germany fio. .—grille from eperecs, fig. .—door-lock, bamberg hungary. museum. were introduced is not certain; very likely by way of moorish spain. figure shows an example of silver- smith's work in a book-cover. ceramics. the most important product of german renaissance ceramics was the huge earthenware (miscalled "porce- lain") stoves which took the place of open fireplaces in germany, as well as in holland and parts of switzer- land. the architecturally decorative character of these a history of ornament structures, built up of white and colored glazed earthen- ware tiles, is shown in fig. . the details of their fio. .—earthenware stove, monbsee, austria. ornamentation varied with the general movement of style. the drinking vessels, jars and table-ware of the german renaissance, of majolica and porcelain, ornament in germany a history of ornament represent a very prolific production, characterized by less decorative distinction than the italian majolicas, but having nevertheless a marked character, thoroughly german in its clever use of line patterns and grotesques (fig. ). nuremberg was the parent city of german renaissance ceramics. here the hirschvogel family, espe- cially veit the elder and his son veit who died , prac- tised various arts including ceramics and enameling. in the th century anspach, hochst, frankenthal and bayreuth became important centers for the production of both majolica and porcelains. the germans developed no new national type either of pottery or of ornament ex- cept the stoves already men- tioned, unless it be the stein or tankard with metal cover, and the china pipe-bowl. in fig. from the tyrol we recog- nize the direct influence of the italian potteries (com- pare with figs. , ). german furniture and woodwork partake of the gen- eral character of the art of the low countries in the use of gaines, half-figures and sculptured panels (fig. ). in the th century cut-out flat ornaments in fio. .—sixteenth-century chair, dresden museum. ornament in germany light wood on a darker wood (or vice-versa) were often applied to the flat members of the frame of the furni- ture, as earlier they had been used on boxes and small objects (fig. ) typographic ornament. a german invented printing with movable type in the middle of the fifteenth century. during the follow- ing century the germans, who had previously done ex- cellent work as illuminators of manuscripts, developed notable proficiency as engravers and as decorators of fig. .—"german text" initials, sixteenth century. printed books. the persistence of the medieval "ger- man text" characters, especially in the case of the capital letters, gave opportunity for highly decorative flourishes impossible with the more sober classic forms of the roman characters (fig. ). these last, used of course for all works in latin, which was still the language of learning and science, were decorated in quite different fashion (fig. ). the designing of line-patterns of free ornament for chapter-headings, tail-pieces, and borders was developed with great in- genuity, the space-filling and distribution of the black on the white being almost invariably of high merit. a history of ornament patterns of this class are called technically niellos, be- cause of their resemblance to niello-work on metal. fig. illustrates another type of typographic decoration of a more architectural character. books recommended: as before, von bezold.—also: anonymous: tafeln zum studium der deutschen renaissance und barockstils (seemann, leipzig, n. d.).—k. o. fritsch: denkmaeler der deutschen renaissance (wasmuth, berlin, ).—gurlitt: das barock und rokoko-ornament dcutschlands (wasmuth, berlin, ). —helm: ornamente und motive dcs rokokostils.—g. hirth: das deutsche zimmer (hirth, munich, ).—lamrert und ornament in germany stahl: motive der deutschen architektur (engelhorn, stutt- gart, ).—w. lurke: geschichte der renaissance in deutschland (ebner & seubert, stuttgart, ).—f. luthmer: deutsche mobel der vergangenheit (seemann, leip- zig, ).—a. ortwein: die deutsche renaissance (seemann, leipzig, ).—r. pfnor, monographie du chateau de heidelberg (morel, paris, ).—w. pinder: deutscher barock (langewische, leipzig, n. d.).—schmidt und schildrach: der konigliche zwinger in dresden (dresden, n. d.). chapter xi renaissance ornament in great britain the beginnings. at the beginning of the th century the english were still building in that distinctively english phase of the late gothic style called the perpendicular, or as applied to civic and domestic architecture, the tudor style. the most splendid monument of the perpen- dicular style, henry vii's chapel at westminster, was not completed until , when henry viii had been six years on the throne; in domestic and collegiate buildings the tudor style persisted well into the reign of elizabeth, which began in . this style was so completely english in its development and so well suited to english life and tastes, that it yielded but slowly to the renaissance influences from italy, france, germany and holland. it can easily be understood that under henry viii who, though not ecclesiastically protestant, had broken with the pope and disestablished the monasteries; under edward vi who was protestant and financially poor; under mary who, though a fanatical romanist, enjoyed too brief a reign to change the powerful anti-papal current of english thought, and under elizabeth who established protestantism as the national religion, the commercial and artistic rela- cp. my hist, of orn. i, chapter xviii, pp. - . ornament in great britain tions of england were closer with protestant holland and germany than with italy and france. with the flemings also england maintained an active commerce, and it was from germany and the low countries chiefly that the influences came that gradually trans- formed english art. before this transformation really began, however, a considerable number of italians had found employ- ment in england. among them were the sculptors torregiano, giovanni da majano and benedetto da rovezzano, the painters bartolommeo penni and toto del nunziata, and the engineer girolamo da trevigi, chiefly in the early years of henry viii ( - ). the earliest italian decorative work in england was in terra-cotta; the medallions with busts and wolsey's coat-of-arms in the walls of wolsey's wing of hampton court ( - , fig. ), the balustrade crowning the facade and other ornaments of sutton place, guildford ( - ), the tomb of lord henry marney ( ) and a tomb at arundel are among many examples. as in spain and france, italians were early in demand as designers and makers of tombs; e.g., the tomb of wol- sey by majano and rovezzano, appropriated by henry viii before its completion and long ago destroyed; the tomb of henry vii by torregiano in henry vii's chapel at westminster and his tomb of the countess of richmond in the same chapel; besides others of less importance. italians were also employed on the decora- tions of henry viii's palace of nonesuch, and on various altars, chantries and minor works in churches. the beautiful choir-stalls and screen of king's college a history of ornament chapel are clearly, in part at least, of italian workmanship. these scattered works, however, exerted little in- fluence on english art in general, least of all on archi- tecture. the formerly general belief that the imposing fio. .—terra-cotta relief, head of c.f.sar, hampton court. design of longleat hall was by the italian john of padua has been pretty thoroughly discredited. during the second half of henry viii's reign and throughout that of elizabeth ( - ) the preference was for flemings, hollanders and germans, and artists and artisans from these countries flocked to england, form- ornament tn great britain ing colonies of foreign workers in some at least of the artistic industries, such as weaving and wood-carving. the greatest of the germans was hans holbein the younger, who not only painted portraits for henry viii but designed gold vessels, ceilings, gate-houses and chimney-pieces for that monarch. from flanders came a group of wood-carvers and weavers, and in under james i, fifty flemish tapestry-workers, who were established at mortlake. under these varied and confused influences the english worked out their own versions of renaissance architecture and ornament, little by little grafting the details of the foreign styles upon the core of their own strongly national design. the transitional period under henry viii and his successors may be considered as lasting from (say) to , when elizabeth ascended the throne, or even to , when the earliest distinctively renaissance buildings like kirby hall were erected. the names "elizabethan" and "jacobean" have been given to the architectural styles developed under elizabeth ( - ) and james i ( - ). there is no clear dividing line between these two styles or phases, in which there was a gradual increase of renaissance de- tails and character and a corresponding decrease and final disappearance of tudor characteristics. motives and details. during elizabeth's reign the general prevalence of peace, the defeat of the spanish armada and a remark- able development of commerce led to a great activity in the building of manor-houses and other large a history of ornament residences. the extraordinary religious, social and intellectual development of this brilliant period was re- flected in the architectural enlargement of the univer- sities of oxford and cambridge, the building of schools and town-halls, the rapid refinement of manners, the increase of foreign travel and the multiplication of objects of artistic character for the service of both public and private life. but the style and con- struction of the great houses continued to be purely english, and it was only in the details that the foreign renaissance influences showed themselves. the germans and flem- ings and hollanders were employed to de- sign doorways and balustrades and carved ornament, and marble columns and statues were imported from the continent, but the general design was in the hands of english builders. the architect had not yet ap- peared as a professional designer and superintendent of the work. fig. .—doric chimney-tops, lacock arrey. ornament in great britain under these conditions classic design could not flourish, and the orders made slow progress in popular favor. they appear on the exterior of longleat, kirby ( ), wollaton, in the form of chimney-tops (fig. ) on burghley ( ) and in a portico on the front of hardwick ( ), but in all these and a few other examples they are travesties of the classic originals. their principal occurrence is in doorways and chimney- pieces, for which the designs are generally attributed to german and dutch pattern-books. a favorite device was the superposition in two or three stories of coupled columns flanking the main entrance and the windows above it, as at hatfield ( ) and the "schools" at oxford ( ). there was no attempt at classical cor- rectness either in the proportions or the details; the effect is picturesque in the mass but wholly lacking in the finer kind of beauty. columns were often banded, and gaines were substituted for columns with increasing frequency, especially after . the chimneypieces show the same general taste; many of them were the work of germans, but they were richer and more successful designs on the whole than the doorways. the fantastic variations of the orders, the gaines, the smaller scale and the enrichments of carved panels above the fireplace shelf or cornice, were more appropriate as interior decorations than for ex-, terior monumental architecture (fig. ). after the accession of james i in the round arch became more common, and the classic proportions were better observed (fig. ), though there was still much extravagant detail of a baroque or german character. a history of ornament windows were still generally mullioned and transomed in tudor fashion; it was not until inigo jones appeared, near the end of the reign, that either windows or door- ways were designed in the classic or "italian" style. fig. .—doorway, hatfield house. ceilings and plaster-work. as was natural in domestic architecture and in the residential buildings of the universities, horizontal ceil- ornament in great britain fig. .—ceiling pattern, great yarmouth. ings were in general use and vaulting almost unknown. these ceilings were rarely either beamed or coffered; they were nearly always of plaster, decorated with deli- cate relief-patterning of molded ribs forming geometric panel-designs, often with a subordinate floral pattern in each panel (figs. , , i). in crewe hall and some other examples pendants occur at intervals, an evident last survival of gothic tradition (fig. ). the walls were usually wainscoted up to a height of six or eight feet, with tapestries or other hangings above; but at haddon hall and in some other examples the space above the wainscot was deco- rated with low-relief ornament in plaster. the decorative use of plaster was confined to do- mestic work; at least it does not this period appear to have in been used in churches or in build- ings of monumental character, and only rarely does it appear in exterior ornament. fio. .—ceiling pattern, slanfihangel, wales. a history of ornament figs. - show various examples of elizabethan and jacobean ceilings and "strapwork" in wood, stone and plaster. fio. .—pendant, ceiling in crewe hall. woodwork and '' strapwork.'' england was a well-wooded country, particularly rich in oaks and nut-trees of various sorts, that is, in woods fitted both for construction and for cabinet work. the distinctive english uses of wood under elizabeth and james were for "open-timber" ceilings over chapels and halls, for wainscoting, and for stairways with their newels and balustrades; these three features giving to english manor-houses, college halls and other interiors an aspect and quality wholly unlike those of any other country. the hammer-beam ceiling or roof (for it was both combined) was a bequest from the late gothic builders, 'see my hist, of orn. i, pp. - , figs. , a. ornament in great britain fic. .—elizarethan and jacorean details. a history of ornament and one so useful and so full of decorative possibilities that it is surprising that it was so early and completely abandoned; it rarely appears after james' accession in , and never after . its essential features are an arch supporting the two main rafters and springing from the projecting ends of opposed hammer-beams, which are supported in turn by curved braces connect- ing them with wall-posts resting on corbels. these elements were treated with great elegance in such ceil- ings as those of the great hall at hampton court; of the great hall of trinity college, cambridge; of middle temple hall and the charterhouse dining-hall in london (the last named disfigured by modern altera- tions) and many others. wainscoting, usually of oak, was paneled in succes- sive tiers of simple rectangular panels, which in early elizabethan examples are some- times carved with the "folded linen" ornament (fig. ); or in rare instances was composed with pilasters or gaines and arches, as in the gallery of haddon hall. carved panels like those of fran- cis i at blois are not found in eng- land. fio. . — "folded the english staircases, unlike lin«n" cm linenfold the french, were usually of oak panel, elizarethan.' instead of stone, preferably built in two or three runs about an open wall, with carved newels and balustrades, all of wood. they were im- portant features of the interior decorative effect, and ornament in great britain display the customary ornamentation of the period in their "strapwork," gaines, miniature arches and other details (fig. , e). this strapwork or applique has already been de- scribed as originating in germany (see ante, pp. , ), and widely used in the netherlands; it was brought by german and flemish or dutch artisans to england, where it became the favorite detail for decoration in both wood and stone. it was easy to design and required only moderate skill to execute. the english extended its application to openwork pat- terns in wood and stone, using it for balustrades and crestings, especially under james i. it appears on nearly all the screens which separated the "withdraw- ing room" of the masters from the more public remainder of the great hall of the manor house, and formed a feature as distinc- i ' b^i^i^h^' ay' tive as the great chimneypiece, the oaken stairs and the plaster ceiling (fig. , h, ). the jacobean phase. during the reign of james i there was a gradual approach toward the taste and forms of the german a history of ornament and flemish renaissance, though the resemblance was never close, and many elizabethan details, like the "strapwork," were still in use. but this last was now more varied; "nail-heads" and "jewels" like those in german and netherlandish ornament were more fre- fio. .—jacorean garles. quent. round arches, balustrades and gaines are mul- tiplied; pilasters and entablatures and pediments are less grotesquely different from the classic; the linen- fold panel disappears, and gables affect curved outlines (figs. - ). the change is gradual, not sudden, and no line can be sharply drawn between the two phases. the palladian innovation. an extraordinary phenomenon in the history of the english renaissance was the revolution in style and taste which followed the return of inigo jones from italy. born in , he was seven years old at the date ornament in great britain of palladio's death, and when he went to italy in his early manhood, the name and fame of palladio were still in the ascendant. inigo jones ac- quired in italy in two visits a fairly thorough knowledge of palladio's style and a great enthusiasm for the italian classic architecture. his arch- itectural activity did not begin, how- ever, until about , but the works carried out from his designs, though not comparable in amount and import- ance with those of his great successor christopher wren, resulted in the complete transformation of english architecture. the most important of his works extant to-day are the ban- queting hall at whitehall—a mere fragment of a vast scheme for a royal palace for james i,—the earlier part of greenwich hospital, the "water gate" for the duke of buckingham, wilton house and lindsey house, lincoln's inn fields, london, a frank imitation of palladio's manner. the change in english taste and english architecture which followed was due not merely to the merit of jones's designs, but also to the general progress of education and knowl- edge of the outside world. the increasing tide of travel and the multiplication of books were making fro . — detail, chimneypiece in aston hall. a history of ornament during this long period architectural ornament, hav- ing lost the picturesque and amusing germanesque character of the elizabethan-jacobean period, gained little in originality or creative inspiration, but was more correct and more sober than before. the architectural decorative details of this period are in general rather dry and cold, though appropriate as far as they go (fig. ). the chief excep- tion to the prevailing commonplaceness of detail is in the wood-carving of the interiors, especially in the work of grinling gibbons ( - ), a hol- lander by birth, who carved the fine stalls and throne in st. paul's, london, the woodwork in trinity college chapel and library at cambridge, and other works at windsor, whitehall, petworth and other great houses, as well as fonts, tombs, etc., in marble. no other english work of the time compares with his in richness of a florid kind and in combined vigor and delicacy of execution (figure ). much other carving of the end of the th and of the th century is notably rich and effective (figs. , ). wren's work is always dignified and well composed. he used coupled columns with good effect and pro- duced picturesque decorative effects in the treatment of small domes, as at greenwich hospital, with columnar buttresses on the diagonal axes, and in his fig. .—steeple of bow church (s b. ry wren. st. mary-le- ow), london, ornament in great britain towers, in which by simple and inexpensive means he accomplished charming results of silhouette (fig. ). james gibbs ( - ) followed with success some- what the same lines, and his beautiful steeple of st. martin's in the fields was the evident direct prototype of many of the best american colonial examples (see p. ). plasterwork took on great importance after the great fire of , following the great plague. the conse- j hmd ts ra=a ■ r ml © hi b| fio. .—ceiling plan of st. mary's woolnoth, london. quent destruction of wealth and necessity of extensive, rapid and economical rebuilding compelled the substitu- tion of lath-and-plaster for more permanent materials for interior finish. the result was disastrous to the cause of honest and solid construction, but favorable to the development of decorative work in plaster, in which the english avoided, the blatant shams and extrava- gances of the italian baroque. figs. , illustrate the new classic spirit in the patterning of ceilings as compared with the interlacing geometric all-over pat- a history of ornament terns of the jacobean phase illustrated in figs. , b. figure presents an example of the best work fio. .—o.ve bay of dome decoration, radcliffe lirrary, oxford, ry girrs. of the new style, in which italians were often employed. later th-century work is less vigorous and interesting. the adam style. robert adam ( - ) was the most celebrated of four brothers, who worked together on a great * robert, james and william, the last named of whom lived until . ornament ix great britain variety of important buildings and blocks of houses in london and edinburgh. in this work they developed, especially in interior design and furniture, the english phase of the reaction towards purity, refinement and delicacy of detail, which we have noticed in france under louis seize (see p. ). rob- ert's visit to italy and dalmatia ( - ) and the influence of piranesi's ex- traordinary engrav- ings may account in part for the develop- ment of the very in- dividual style of the adam brothers; french influence and the general re- action from the heaviness or extrava- gance of previous styles also had their part in the change. while the adam ornament includes a very free treat- ment of capitals, moldings and other architectural de- tails (fig. ) with a studied preference for very slight projections and small details, its most conspicuous contribution was in the design of plaster ceilings. the small scale of parts, the delicate moldings, slender 'giovanni battista piranesi ( - ), venetian engraver. fio. .—architectural details, adam style. a history of ornament fig. .—two adam ceilings. ornament in great britain scrolls, rinceaux, wreaths and festoons suggest pom- peiian and roman stucco-relief rather than spalato or piranesi's engravings, and bear some resemblance to louis seize work (fig. ). the adam furniture and that of the nearly contemporary makers chippen- dale, sheraton and hepplewhite, will be referred to later. the minor arts. the english iron- work, from the time of charles ii for more than a hundred years, suggests a blending of italian and french types, with no german influence. gates and grilles of monumental size and richness were fashioned with flat bars, with straight up- rights predominating in the main body, and bent and scrolled work in the upper portions, and a moderate amount of excellent forged and repousse ornament (fig. ). cast lead, despite the meanness of the material, was handled with success for eaves- troughs, finials and garden ornaments. the growing wealth of the georgian period led to a remarkable de- velopment of the silversmith's art, in both sterling and fio. .—detail, iron gate at hamp- ton coubt. a history of ornament plated ware. the details of this th century silver were strongly influenced by the contemporary french taste, but were generally heavier and more crowded fio. . — silver fire- fio. . — silver doc, knole park. wine-urn, . than the french (figs. , ). the workmanship was, however, excellent, and there is a british solidity in these sumptuous pieces that in part atones for their frequent lack of delicacy in detail. furniture. the elizabethan furniture was simple and solid in design; chests, tables, benches and chairs of a somewhat massive type being the chief articles used. a frequent ornament on chests and wooden mantelpieces is a carved arch between pilasters or gaines or plain stiles, with rather elementary carving and strapwork applique on the panel as in figs. , . turned legs were com- ornament in great britain mon, often with inordinately swollen vase-forms (fig. ). in the jacobean period there was, as we should expect, an increase of elegance and lightness, with greater variety in the carving and with germanized renaissance details more in evidence. turned supports are more frequent in tables, chairs and cabinets; the over-heavy swellings of vase-forms are less common, and the earliest spirally- turned legs begin to appear. this evolution towards ele- gance and towards a more italian type of ornament be- came more pronounced dur- ing the inigo jones-christo- pher wren period. spirally- turned legs, stretchers and spindles become common, in- fluenced perhaps by the vogue of the twisted columns of the italian and spanish baroque styles (pi. xiv, ; see p. ). the carved detail follows classic and italian precedents, and shows in- creasing refinement and elegance, not only in furniture but even more effectively in the woodwork of mantel- pieces, and the interior dressings of doors and windows. pi. xiv, shows three chairs of the style of the late th century or early th. towards the end of the th century chairs became objects of especial attention, and there was a notable increase in the variety and number both of kinds of furniture and designs in each kind. a series of noted fio. . — detail, eliza- rethan oak chest. a history of ornament fig. .—chimneypiece, worcestershire. fig. .—the "great bedstead" of cromwell. ornament in great britain architects and furniture-makers, including sir william chambers ( - ), robert adam ( - ), thomas chippendale (fl. ), hepplewhite (died ), and sheraton ( - ), with their imitators, produced entirely new models of chairs, of small and light tables and lamp stands, of library desks, bookcases, chests of fig. .—a chippendale chair. fig. .—a heppiewhite chair. drawers, commodes, settees and the like, which are known by their names. these cannot here be enumer- ated and distinguished, but the illustrations figs. - show a few of the types of chairs, which were gener- ally executed in mahogany, walnut or cherry, rather than in the oak which had formerly been the almost universal material used. especial attention was given to the backs, framed with curved bars; the rear legs a history of ornament being usually straight, the front legs frequently curved ("cabriole"), and lightness and grace being sought rather than massive richness. "chinese" patterns, so called, were sometimes used by chambers, adam and chippendale. except in his "chinese" designs, chip- pendale's work shows in its carved details the strong influence of the french louis quinze style, but the forms of his furniture are generally though not al- ways simpler, and the deco- ration always more re- strained than in that style. the hepplewhite and sheraton patterns were more severe in line than ■ ■ ... -it chippendale's, but light // u |y and graceful, with much ujtlr* use of inlays and purflings of lighter wood (figs. , ). many of these ar- ticles of georgian furni- ture were imported to the american colonies before, and to the united states after, the revolution, and became the prototypes of many examples of our american-made "colonial" furniture. another branch of decorative woodwork demands mention, as influencing early american art: the wooden spindles, newels, railings and stair-ends of english houses during this same period. the mahogany hand- fig. .—a sheraton chair. ornament in great britain rail, turning outward in a spiral curve to meet the turned or carved newel; the slender balusters, usually of three different spiral designs to each step, and the carved modillion-ornament at the end of each step, fig. .—staircase detail, house in chichester. shown in fig. , were a common and elegant feature of english hall stairways. they were imported to america in considerable number, and later copied or imitated as characteristic decorative elements in amer- » ican interiors (see p. ). a history of ornament ceramics. except for the coarser and commoner kinds of domestic earthenware, ceramic art does not appear to have flourished in england until the time of charles ii, a little after the middle of the th century, when toft began work in kent, and others soon after in stafford- shire and at lambeth, a suburb of london. flemish potters had, it is true, established themselves in london as early as , and under charles i ( - ) "patents" -had been granted to various in- dividuals (thomas rous, david ramsey and others) for the making of "pigs," bot- tles, pots and tiles. but f.o. s.-a torr plattm. these pioneers, chiefly in staffordshire, pro- duced little except salt-glazed "stoneware," and the nearest approach to artistic design was in ale-pots and "bellarmines," which were fat-bellied, small-necked jugs with bearded faces at the top, to caricature the catholic prelate bellarmine who died in . by staffordshire was producing marbled and colored wares; porcelain was made at fulham by dwight in , and in the elers brothers from nuremberg at bradwell near burslem began making red porcelain and imitating japanese designs. fig. illustrates ornament in great britain the crudity of toft's work ( ). the great potteries of bow, chelsea, worcester and derby were not started until about ; that of plymouth a little later; but the bow and chelsea potteries were consolidated by duesbury in with the derby works, and ceased production the following year. "crown derby" ware received its name in , as the result of the making of a dinner set in that year for the princess of wales; in like manner josiah wedgwood's "queen's ware" was so called because of a set made in his works for queen charlotte. the rapid development of this highly important branch of england's industrial art in the second half of the th century received a great impetus on the artistic side from the genius of josiah wedgwood ( - ); and on the commercial side from the inven- tion by sadler of liverpool of the process of transfer- printing on earthenware (about ). about the same time the practice was introduced of painting on imported oriental china wares (by planche at derby). during the second half of the th century there was an extraordinary development of ceramic art and activity in england, in the production alike of glazed earthenwares and of porcelain. the variety of forms and of kinds and processes of decoration was enor- mously increased and its artistic quality correspond- ingly improved, so that english porcelain became an important article of export, especially to the colonies and the united states. by far the most important single agent in this development was josiah wedgwood, whose cultivated taste found inspiration in the classical a history of ornament revival of his time. first at burslem, then at "etruria," near stoke, he built up an extraordinary industry., pro- ducing wares of the greatest variety, shaped generally after classic roman models, and decorated both in color and relief with remarkable refinement of design and detail upon grounds of yellow, porphyry, light or dark fio. .—a wedgwood teapot. fio. .—a bow vase. crusted with delicately modeled reliefs of classic sub- jects in white, has continued to be made to this day. many of these cameo-like reliefs were modeled or designed by the sculptor flaxman. it is impossible within our limits to discuss or illustrate in any adequate fashion the great variety of ornament in great britain forms and ornamental details of english ceramic art of the th century. the preceding paragraphs and the illustrations in figs. - and pi . xiv will have to suffice: for further details the reader is referred to fio. .—crown derry cup and saucer. llewellyn jewitt's "ceramic art in great britain" (london, virtue, ). textiles. weaving as a branch of decorative art, and the asso- ciated arts of the needle and lace-pillow, were of late development in england, which long depended upon its near neighbors, france, holland and flanders, for fine fabrics, embroideries, tapestries and laces. charles ii established flemish tapestry weavers at mortlake in or thereabout, and in plate x, and , are shown details from tapestries woven in mortlake. but the art remained essentially a foreign art, developing no distinctive character in england, and lasted only a short period. looms for brocades, velvets and other a history of ornament fine fabrics were not numerous until well into the th century, when the textile industries, which had been greatly stimulated by the influx of huguenots expelled from france in , began to develop those activities which in the following century placed england in the van of the world's textile manufacturing, though still far behind france in silks and brocades. the english lace industry dates only from the closing years of the th century. books recommended: r. and j. adam: the decorative works of r. and j. adam (london, ; batsford, london, ).—g. p. bankart: the art of the plasterer (batsford, london, ).—bates and guild: english household furniture (b. & g., boston, ).—belcher and macartney: later renaissance archi- tecture in england (batsford, london, ).—r. blom- field: a history of renaissance architecture m england (bell & sons, london, ).—c. camprell: vitruvius brit- annicus (campbell, london, ).—h. cescinsky: english furniture of the xviii century (routledge, london, ). —a. e. chancellor: examples of old furniture etc. (bats- ford, london, ).—t. chippendale: the gentleman and cabinetmaker's director (chippendale, london, ).—d. j. errets: examples of decorative wrought-ironwork of xvii and xviii centuries (batsford, london, ).—j. s. gard- ner: english ironwork of xvii and xviii centuries (bats- ford, london, ).—gotch and brown: architecture of the renaissance in england (batsford, london, ).—a. hepplewhite: the cabinetmaker and uplwlsterer's guide ( ; batsford, london, ).—hessling: englische kunst- mbbel (hessling, berlin, n. d.).—p. macqitoid: a history of english furniture (lawrence & bullen, london, ).—j. nash: mansions of england (mclean, london, ).— w. papworth: renaissance and italian styles of architecture in great britain (batsford, london, ).—a. e. richard- ornament in great britain son: monumental classic architecture in great britain and ireland (batsford, london, ).—c. j. richardson: archi- tectural remains of the reigns of elizabeth and james i (ackerman, london, ); studies from old english man- sions, furniture etc. (mclean, london, ).—w. b. sanders: examples of carved oak woodwork (quaritch, london, ).—h. shaw: details of elizabethan architec- ture (pickering, london, ).—t. sheraton: the cabinet- maker and upholsterer's drawing book (sheraton, london, ).—t. a. strange: english furniture, decoration, woodwork and allied arts in xvll-xlx century (strange, london, ).—j. swarrrick : robert adam and his brothers (batsford, london, ).—h. tanner, jr.: english interior woodwork of xv-xviii century (batsford, london, ). —a. tipping: english homes (scribners, new york, ).— a. bolton: robert adam (scribners, new york, ). chapter xii renaissance and colonial ornament in america character of colonial art. colonists are always distributors of culture. they carry to their new home the tastes and aptitudes of their own people, and naturally seek to preserve these as long and as completely as possible. but the new environ- ment inevitably modifies these, and a new culture gradu- ally develops, in which reminiscences of the art of the old home are blended with the forms of the new. when the new home is a wild and undeveloped country, as was the case with those who first came to america, the modi- fying influences are those of new conditions, a new environment, new materials, and dependence on inter- course with more favored lands for the finer comforts and amenities of life. the style of the home-land is therefore more persistent in such a case than when the new home is among peoples already civilized, whereby the two cultures are intimately blended. in a new and raw environment the transplanted culture differs from that of the home-land only in those characteristics that result from the change in environment, climate and materials and the struggle with nature. all this is as true of the architecture and ornament of colonized lands as of their dress, manners and speech. colonial ornament in america the difference between spanish america and english- speaking america is evident to the most superficial observer. the spanish colonists carried with them their architecture and their decorative taste, and estab- lished these in lands where it was possible to preserve and perpetuate them in a fashion strongly reminiscent of spain, thanks not only to the wealth of spain and of her church in the sixteenth century, but also to the wealth and resources of the parts of the new world which they conquered, already the homes of ancient and highly-developed civilizations, and not wholly unlike spain in climate. the english colonists of north america, on the other hand, occupied at first, for the most part, the heavily-wooded shores and river valleys of new england, and were compelled to translate the architectural forms of their own country from brick and stone into wood. when the conquest of wild nature had proceeded far enough, the colonists were able to concern themselves with the production of archi- tectural and industrial works of an artistic character. but only by slow degrees were the imported products in wood and metal, in ceramics and textiles, replaced by those of colonial manufacture. commerce, travel, tradition and a common language and literature all tended to maintain the influence of the parent culture and art, even after political independence had been secured. thus the criticism often heard from euro- pean, especially french, visitors, that american art differs little from european art, is in substance correct; but their further contention that it ought to be funda- mentally different, a wholly new and original art, a history of ornament ignores the facts that we are a european people, though transplanted to a non-european environment; that our entire cultural inheritance is european; that our his- torical, literary and religious antecedents are euro- pean; and that precisely in those factors that belong to our american environment our manners, customs and art do differ from the european, even to-day when commerce, ocean travel, the telegraph and the press are constantly multiplying the links with the old world. spanish-american ornament. the colonial ornament of the western world we naturally divide into the two general categories of the spanish and the english. the spanish influence pre- vails in central and south america, in mexico and in those spanish territories that were later absorbed into the united states, especially florida, new mexico, arizona and california. in these states there is little spanish work antedating the th century, and the greater part of what remains belongs to the th. in south and central america and mexico, on the other hand, there are specimens of ecclesiastical art of the th and early th centuries. churches and altar- pieces are purely spanish, with but few exceptions in which the indian taste has found expression. the wealth of both church and state in spain enabled the colonists to build and adorn their churches with a splendor in strange contrast to the poverty and sim- plicity of those of the english colonies (figures . ; pi. xv), and to employ artists from spain as well as to import statuary, altars, church furniture and the colonial ornament in america richest products of industrial art in gold, silver, bronze, ceramics and textiles from spain itself. for the spanish colonists were not, like most of the english, exiles for their faith or else independent pioneers, but conquerors alike in the military, ecclesiastical and political fields, sent out or aided by the spanish government. moreover the traditions of the aztec and inca civilizations were by no means extinct. the indians of central and south america and yucatan were skilful stone-cutters and metal-workers, and the conquerors availed themselves to the fullest extent of their crafts- manship, so that the spanish colonial arts exhibited a magnificence wholly lacking in the northern continent. accordingly spanish art in america underwent little change, and the details do not differ essentially from those of the traditional spanish styles, even when the work as a whole, in its composition and general aspect, displays the qualities of a provincial art. as the majority of the extant monuments were built after the middle of the th century, it is the churrigueresque style that is most often in evidence. as a typical example of this florid style, we may from a long list select the facade of the church in lima, peru, shown in figure , that of el posito at guadalupe, mexico (figure ), and that of the church at chihuahua, mexico, where in true spanish style the entrance portal provides the motive for a splurge of fantastic ornament spread over the otherwise plain front (fig. ). the field of hispano-american ornament is a very extensive one, both in architecture and in the industrial a history of ornament arts. the number and splendor of the churches in spanish and portuguese south america, in mexico and in central america, are such as to offer an immense amount of interesting material for study. much of fig. .—church facade, chihuahua, mexico. this material is available in photographic reproductions in published works, but as yet very few libraries in the united states possess any of these works, which are for the most part in spanish. the limitations of this work forbid giving to this subject the space which its colonial ornament in america intrinsic interest merits, and a very few illustrations must suffice as samples of this widespread art. perhaps the most interesting single monument of hispano-american architecture is the cathedral of mexico. this is not only the largest of all its works, covering nearly ,- square feet, but it is one of the larg- est churches in the world, ranking sixth or seventh in area. it is also interesting as exemplifying all stages of spanish architectural style from the plateresco through the chur- rigueresque, having been begun in , the main structure being completed in , though the fa- cade was not finished until nor the dome until . the "sagrario" (sacristy) with its ornate churrigueresque facade (pi. xv, ), is of the th century. the churrigueresque extravagances are confined to altars and chapels in the interior. the main portal, though belonging to the baroque period, is in almost pure griego-romano style (pi. xv, ). the same plate illustrates other phases of the style. fid. . confessional, cathedral of mexico, mexico city. a history of ornament the "mission" style of california is interesting architecturally rather than decoratively; its simplicity and lack of ornament are in strong contrast to the splendor of the more southern colonies. colonial ornament in the united states. there was little wealth among the early colonists of the united states, whether english, french or dutch. the majority were agriculturists, and in considerable proportion religious exiles. they came to an almost virgin country peopled by savages, covered with forests, with no background of ancient cultures like those of the mayas and aztecs, and with no wealth of gold and silver to enrich the new population. the earliest build- ings were of wood; until the th century there was little work for stone-masons or bricklayers, except in limited regions where clay or easily-worked stone was available without first cutting away the forests. after the conquest of nature and the gradual growth of towns at the natural seaports and upon the navigable rivers, and the creation of practicable roads of inter- communication, had progressed sufficiently to permit of the beginnings of wealth and the introduction of some of the amenities and elegances of life. carpentry with its allied art of joinery, weaving and needlework were the arts earliest developed under these conditions; for metalwork, pottery and china, glass, fine furniture and textiles other than the simplest home-made products, the colonists depended upon importations from eng- land or holland, and later, to some extent, from france. gradually, and especially after the middle of the th colonial ornament in america century, the making and use of brick, the quarrying and cutting of stone and marble, and the production of fine cabinet-work and furniture in imitation of english models, became more general; and towards the end of the century glass-blowing, mining, smelting and various forms of metal-work began on a modest scale in scat- tered centers. cotton-mills were built in new england early in the th century; but until almost the end of that century the united states were still largely de- pendent on europe for most of the finer products of industrial art in textiles and china. architectural ornament. there was naturally very little effort at decoration of even the finest houses of the seventeenth century. life was too strenuous, the energies of the colonists too much absorbed by the struggle for existence, to allow of much expenditure, whether of money, time or thought, on the elegances of architecture. almost the only char- acteristic detail that has come down to us from that early period is the axe-hewn or adze-hewn bracket and pendant from the front overhang of a few houses in massachusetts and connecticut. an example of this naive and primitive decorative detail is shown in fig. , sketched in from a house in farmington, conn., built about but demolished about . by civilization, population, commerce and wealth along the northern atlantic coast had advanced sufficiently to allow of a certain elegance in the archi- tecture and domestic life of the well-to-do, which shows itself alike in the houses and the churches. from about a history of ornament or , for a full century, the prevalent archi- tectural forms were those developed by the colonial and early republican carpenter-builders in wood. these builders, whether english-born or not, were trained in the english traditions of the queen anne and georgian periods; they used english molding-profiles and worked from english pattern-books or from traditional instruction re- ceived in their apprenticeship. but the english details, de- signed chiefly for execution in stone, had to be interpreted in wood, which was the almost uni- versal building-material. under these conditions architectural de- tails were transformed, fortu- nately in a manner which reflects credit upon both the taste of the builders and the soundness of the traditions they inherited. the proportions of columns and pilasters were often more slen- der than those of the english or because the builders attempted nothing startling, nothing beyond their modest powers, the results were almost invariably pleasing. the re- finement of the moldings, the delicacy of the carved ornaments, the harmony of the proportions and the simplicity of the composition are such as modern architects have found not easy to surpass. the most interesting ornamental details of the fro. .—detail, overhang of house, farmincton, connecticut. classic originals, and figure . mantelpiece, ladd house, portsmouth, new hampshire. figure . detail, fireplace, brockiss house, germantown, pennsylvania. a history of ornament entablatures, rarely with pediments (fig. ), and were almost invariably square-headed, with the excep- tion of dormers. after or thereabout, palladian triple windows began to appear on the main stair- landing and above the doorway (pi. xvi, ). dor- mers were commonly pedimented over arched windows. cornices of classic type, denticular or with block- modillions, crowned the facade and ran up the gables at either end, but were rarely carried horizontally across the gable-ends. they were generally carried around the corner a short distance and returned into the gable wall. exterior pilasters were rare until ; then at first only at the cor- ners; then, at least in new england, also to flank the central bay of the front and carry the steep pediment with which the central bay was often crowned (fig. ). during the second half of the th century the pros- perity of the atlantic coast towns and cities led to a progressive enrichment of the exterior, especially with porches to the central doorways, with roof-balustrades and with palladian windows. the doorways of this period are often of great beauty, with a fanlight over fio. .—scroll pediment, window of hancock house, boston. a history of ornament exteriors was the urn or vase used as a finial, alike for gate-posts and to adorn the angles of gables (fig. ). church steeples were variants of the types developed by wren and gibbs (see p. ). they were usually of wood, even when the tower below was of stone or brick. the details were of a fairly pure classical type, fio. .—decorative urns and gate-post, salem, massachusetts. as in the english models, which were quite closely fol- lowed in many of the best examples (fig. ). fences and gates to private houses were usually of wood and treated often with considerable elegance; but few remain to the present time (fig. ). between and the influence of the adam style (see p. ) became manifest in a greater delicacy, freedom and attenuation of exterior details, especially of pilasters, capitals and cornices. colonial ornament in america brick and stone. in the james river valley, in the neighborhood of philadelphia, and here and there in restricted regions v£k>rww / m. fio. .—two colonial spires: christ church, philadelphia, and st. paul's, new york. elsewhere, the existence of abundant clay and the absence or extinction of forest growth led to a more general use of brick for houses and churches than in the wooded a history of ornament colonies of new england. in the hudson river valley the dutch farmer-colonists found a soft red sandstone easily worked by masons of moderate skill, while a greenish limestone supplied ambitious philadelphia!! fig. .—gate to cowles mansion, farmington, connecticut. suburbs with material for house-walls of a very solid and substantial aspect. yet while these materials and the provincial taste combined to produce architectural en~ sembles quite different from those of new england— - colonial ornament in america and of old england as well—the details of decoration differed little from the general georgian types, and were generally executed in wood and painted white. no colonial school of stone-carving or of ornamenta- tion in terra-cotta developed from the use of these ma- terials, and even in churches and public buildings stone columns were hardly ever used before the revolution. the coarse details of the john bartram house at kinses- sing near philadelphia ( ) represent an interesting early experiment which, in spite of its comparative suc- cess, remained sterile of fruit in later work. interior woodwork. in the interior fittings of their houses, churches and public buildings the colonial woodworkers produced their most interesting and charming results. the fio. .—chimneypiece, phillipse manor, yonxers, new york. abundance of superb timber, and especially of enormous white-pine trees, provided them with unsurpassed ma- terials for framed work such as wainscot-panels, doors, door- and window-trim and staircases and for carved a history of ornament details; the white pine particularly being easily worked and at once soft and durable. panels two feet and even three feet wide could be cut from a single board. in many of the finer houses along the coast, even as early as - , the entire side of the room containing the fireplace was finished in paneling to the cornice, and the staircase hall was in some cases paneled in like manner fio. .—upper part of doorway, gunbton hall, virginia. up to the ceiling on all four sides. chimney pieces were especially elegant, with pilasters or colonnettes to sup- port the shelf, which was finely molded, and above which the face of the chimney-breast was usually adorned with a large panel in a crossetted frame in wood or plaster (fig. ; figure ; pi. xvii, ). in the later examples the details are finer and more attenu- ated; and in place of the flutings, headings and fan- panels previously common, we find an increasing prevalence of applied ornaments in composition or colonial ornament in america papier-mache—vases, baskets, figures, swags, etc.—im- ported from france and england and used with taste and discretion (figure ). doorway frames were richly molded, the moldings in the finer houses, especially of maryland and virginia, being carved with the egg- fio. .—detail of declaration chamrer, fio. .—detail, ionic independence hall, philadelphia. order, doorway of cary house, batavia, new york. and-dart and acanthus (fig. ) and topped with an entablature or even with a scrolled pediment (fig. ; figure ). interior cornices were also elaborate, exe- cuted sometimes in wood, sometimes in plaster with dentils and modillions (fig. ; figure ). the use a history of ornament of the orders, whether internal or external, followed either the classic precedents (figs. , ) or the freer georgian handling, as in fig. . the corin- thian column is seldom used. staircases were treated as important features of the interior. the ends of the stairs were sometimes carved and the balustrade composed of slender spindles, three mwwwwtmw fia. .—detail, interior cornice of homewood, baltimore. to each step. after the spiral spindle becomes common, and sometimes a spiral newel supports the spirally-coiled end of the hand-rail (fig. ). this was generally of mahogany after the west india trade had begun to develop to important proportions. col- umns to cany the arch separating the front parlor from the rear parlor or the dining-room, or dividing the entrance hall from the stairway, were not introduced until about the middle of the century; they were at first more common in the houses of the rich southern plant- colonial ornament in america ers and merchants than in the north. ah these details correspond fairly well with the contemporary work in england, and the stair-balustrades were probably for a fio. .—detail or stairway, lee house, marrlehead, massachusetts. long time imported. this appears from the fact that they are of practically identical design in new england and in maryland and virginia. in the ladd house at portsmouth, n. h., there is in one of the chimney-pieces a history of ornament a fine carved panel attributed to grinling gibbons, and almost certainly not carved on this side of the ocean. but as the century advanced the native craftsmen de- veloped increasing artistic skill; dependence on the motherland diminished, and the later work was prob- ably all home-made. moreover in the woodwork as a whole there is a fundamental difference of effect from the english prototypes. the softness and fine grain of the white pine led to the use of small, fine moldings and delicate ornaments in low relief, contrasting with the heavier, more vigorous english work in oak. more- over the american woodwork, being mostly of white pine, was usually painted white, though in rare instances it was left unpainted and allowed to mellow into a dull golden tone. a dull gray was also used sometimes, but the prevailing finish was white, which gave to the colonial interiors a bright and cheerful effect in striking contrast to the dark tones of the english woodwork in oak. a characteristic feature of much of the american woodwork, derived not from england but from the facility of working the straight-grained white pine with plane, gouge and chisel, is the prevalence of flutings, reedings, headings and fanlike ornaments and rosettes, as in fig. from the so-called "jumel" (morris) house in new york. by the middle of the centur}" a new civic conscious- ness had appeared, a new solidarity of interest in each colony, and civic architecture began to be developed in buildings like independence hall, philadelphia, of which the central block dates from , and faneuil hall, boston ( ). the churches, designed mainly colonial ornament in america after the wren-gibbs tradition, had already taken on internally a dignity and classic elegance of detail not always evident externally except in their spires. the civic buildings show something of the same quality, as in the dignified doric treatment of the "declaration fig. .—details, morris-jumel mansion, new york. chamber" of independence hall, illustrated in fig. . in the later years of the century there was greater variety of effect. the influence of the adam style in england and of the louis seize in france gradually made itself felt jn the young republic in a greater free- dom, refinement and delicacy of detail. this is ob- servable in both the interior and exterior details. fig. shows an example of this new "adam" spirit in a a history of ornament doorway from the mappa mansion at trenton, n. j., and in the mantelpiece from germantown, pa., in fig- ure % already referred to. the importation of mahog- any from the west indies led to its increasing use not only for furniture and stair-rails but also for doors, fio. .—upper part of door, mappa house, trenton, new jersey. inside window-shutters and the trim of doors and win- dows. this was more general in the rich southern colonies than in the north, but was by no means confined to them. marble was also sometimes used for fireplaces, as in the tayloe ("octagon") house at washington ( ). furniture. the home-made furniture of the early colonists was extremely simple, all the finer pieces being imported from england or holland. the making of copies or imitations of the english models in these finer grades of work seems to have begun about to be quite gen- eral, though there are many pieces of the william-and- mary and queene anne periods ( - ) of which we cannot be quite certain whether they were of home colonial ornament in america or foreign production (fig. )%. even in the th century there had been a sporadic production of pieces of considerable merit by local artisans. thus the carved chests made in hadley, mass., are highly valued; and the chest of drawers on a stand in figure a might be taken for an excellent dutch piece. the english types fig. .—carved details of chair-back, william and mary style. of chairs of the second half of the century—chippen- dale, sheraton and hepplewhite (see pp. , ) — were freely imitated after , and the native cabinet- makers of that time also developed types of their own in chests of drawers ("low-boys" and "high-boys"), in four-post beds, "secretaries," bureau-desks and the like. the louis quinze or rococo ornaments that appear on much of the english chippendale furniture seem never colonial ornament in america ing though simple design, generally identical with eng- lish examples. there is almost no carving in relief, and the adornments of pediments, arched tops and other architectural features are very few. as in the archi- tecture of this period, the charm of the furniture con- sists not in the richness of its ornament, but rather in the grace of its lines, the excellent sense of proportion which it displays, its admirable workmanship and the refinement of its very restrained decoration. figure c, d, illustrates the americanization of louis xvi and adam suggestions. other arts. in the field of textiles the production was very modest. only the simplest fabrics were produced on the colonial looms as a rule, although figured bed-coverlets were woven by the more ambitious craftswomen in sim- ple patterns of blue and white. domestic needlework and embroidery produced little that is of real artistic value or importance. the traditions of english design had faded, and there was no artistic training nor any artistic background or environment to stimulate the arts of design (pi. xvii, ). it was easier to import than to make the more elaborate fabrics. where every one was busy in raising the necessities of life there was little chance for the development of an artisan class or of trained craftsmanship in the minor arts. the elaborate landscape wall-papers seen in the fine th-century houses of portsmouth, marblehead and salem and other seaport towns, and in virginia and maryland, were all imported, chiefly from france. so also with silks, . a history of ornament brocades, laces, china and glass. silverware was, how- ever, made by artisans of considerable skill in the latter part of the th century (e.g. by paul revere); but it was of simple form with little ornamentation. stiegel in pennsylvania produced glass of great variety and sometimes of genuine artistic elegance. brass candle- sticks and knockers, cast-iron firebacks (the earliest by stieffel in pennsylvania), and wrought-iron gates, grilles, porch-railings, door-hinges, sign-brackets and the like, were produced in increasing amount as the th century drew to its close. but there is little distinctive ornament in any of these arts until well into the nine- teenth century. books recommended: asher benjamin: the country builder's assistant and other works (arch. b'k pub. co., new york, ).—glenn brown: the octagon mansion (amer. inst, of architects, washington, ).—j. e. chandler: the colonial archi- tecture of maryland, pennsylvania and virginia (bates & guild, boston, ).—l. a. coffin: brick architecture of the colonial period in maryland and virginia (arch. b'k pub. co., new york, ).—corner and soderholtz: colonial architecture in new england (boston architectural club, ).—f. cousins: the wood-carver of salem, samuel maclntire (little, boston, ).—cousins and riley: the colonial architecture of salem; the colonial architecture of philadelphia (little, brown & co., boston, and ).— w. a. dyer: scale drawings of colonial furniture (helburn, new york, ); early american craftsmen (the century co., new york, ' ).—h. d. ererlein: colonial architec- ture in america (little, brown & co., boston, ).—p. elder: the old spanish missions of california (elder, san francisco, ).—n. w. elwell: the architecture, furni- ture and interiors of maryland and virginia; colonial furni- chapter xiii the modern revivals and nineteenth century conditions after . the last quarter of the eighteenth century witnessed a remarkable development of archaeological research. the rediscovery of pompeii, the publication of stuart and revett's "the antiquities of athens," the mar- velous engravings of piranesi, stimulated new enter- prises of exploration in classic lands. robert adam published his "spalatro" in ; wood and dawkins their works on baalbek and palmyra in and ; and other works on attica and ionia followed in quick succession. the stream thus started flowed with in- creasing volume through the early part of the following century; the excavation of pompeii was actively carried on, and sumptuous works on both greek and roman antiquities became an important feature of every schol- arly library, public or private. the foundations of scientific archaeological discussion were laid by winckel- mann in his studies of the albani collection, and of the philosophical esthetics of classical art by lessing in his "laocoon," and a new literature of historic art came into being. every gentleman who pretended to scholarly tastes was supposed to know something about greek and roman architecture. but the new interest was after all scholarly and literary rather than artistic; often the modern revivals an affectation, a polite accomplishment rather than a native artistic enthusiasm. the stream of artistic creation was running dry, and the impression became general that good design could be produced only by conformity to ancient models, even to the extent of copying ancient buildings wholly or in part. planning and construction were neglected or wholly subordinated to facade design, and a new era began of what may be called imitative design, not only in architecture but in all the arts. the dearth of creative art was partly due to the pre- occupation of europe and america with tremendous political and industrial movements. the american revolution, followed by the french revolution, ushered in a new age of democracy; the napoleonic wars shook europe to its foundations, changed the boundaries of nations and developed the new system of the "balance of power." but the industrial revolution which fol- lowed the invention of the steam-engine dealt an even more disastrous blow to creative activity in the field of applied art, for it brought about the decline, almost the disappearance of craftsmanship. it made possible three new things: cheap and rapid transportation, the substitution of machine-processes for hand-labor, with the resulting development of mass-production and end- less repetition; and the concentration of production in densely populated industrial centers. the advantages of the modern industrial system in multiplying the com- forts and conveniences of life and cheapening the cost of many articles of consumption are certainly very great; but the dissociation of design from execution, the a history of ornament division of labor, the division of the former craftsman's tasks between highly-paid designers and low-paid "op- eratives" or mill-hands, the disappearance of the artisan who made with his own hands the objects he himself designed, and the mechanical uniformity of the machine- product as contrasted with the individuality and human touch of the craftsman's work—all these changes wrought by the modern system have been disastrous to the arts of design. the grave economic and social prob- lems created by this system are outside of the fieldof our present discussion. influence on decorative arts. the industrial revolution was accompanied by an ex- traordinary development of the natural sciences, and by an equally remarkable advance in popular education, in the dissemination of knowledge, and by a vast in- crease in commerce and international intercourse. it would be interesting to trace the inter-relations between the progress of democratic institutions, the advance of science and the development of both the higher educa- tion and that of the masses, and of these with the social and industrial changes and the rise of the labor move- ment, and then to study the influence of all these related movements upon the fine and industrial arts. this discussion might well occupy a volume, and we can here point out only a few of its more salient points. in the first place, the preoccupation with these great human problems was long fatal to any great movement in art. nations struggling with questions of national existence and with the development of the new powers the modern revivals and resources created by the scientists, explorers and industrialists, had little energy remaining for the cult of the beautiful. the pursuit of the fine arts was left to the few, to the intellectuals and the people of leisure; art was more and more dissociated from life, as a luxury or an accomplishment rather than an essential element of life. the intellectuals felt the poverty of the art of their time, but did not know how to cure it. some de- manded the revival of the historic styles, meaning thereby the imitation or copying of the forms and details of the past, with no understanding of the principles that had given life and meaning to those forms. others raised the cry "back to nature," not realizing that only the artist can interpret and use the forms of nature in art, and that the artist must be trained both in the technic of his art and in the appreciation and delineation of the beautiful, before he can create beauty even out of the manifold inspirations supplied by nature. the development of scientific archaeology during the first part of the century supplied a powerful stimulus to the partisans of the first theory. this stimulus was intensified by the invention of lithography by alois senefelder in ; later by the invention of photog- raphy (by de la niepce in , daguerre in , and talbot a little later); and later again (about ) by the invention of various processes for photo-engraving and photo-lithography. by these the publication of archaeological works, monographs and books of all kinds on architecture and the decorative arts was made pos- sible at a cost within the reach of ordinary purses. to these must be added two others: the multiplication and a history of ornament development of museums of art, including architecture and the decorative arts, and the equally remarkable multiplication of schools of art. to offset the lack of craftsmen and to meet the requirements of the factories, it was necessary to train draftsmen and designers. the popularization of various kinds of knowledge about the arts had created, by the end of the nineteenth century, a greatly increased popular demand for manufactured products having at least a semblance of artistic beauty; the books and the schools, the museums and the great international exhibitions (the first at london in ) stimulated both the demand and the supply. mean- while, especially since about , there has been a notable revival of craftsmanship, largely through the activity of "arts-and-crafts" societies—a movement initiated by william morris in england in the second half of the nineteenth century. as a result of all these movements and developments there has come about a notable revival of the arts, a great advance in the gen- eral average of taste, a remarkable improvement in the quality not only of the major arts, but also of all the industrial arts, alike in hand-made and machine-made products. the early recourse to a slavish imitation of the historic styles has given place to a freer and more intelligent use of them, based on a better appreciation of their underlying principles. the study of nature, having been found to be futile by itself as a restorer of the arts, has been subordinated to an intelligent training in the fundamental principles of decorative design. the movement known as "art nouveau" (see p. ), aris- ing in the later years of the last century as a protest the modern revivals against traditionalism in art, has had the effect, in spite of its eccentricities and extravagances, of infusing a fresh note of originality into modern design in archi- tecture and the industrial arts alike. the difference between the art of to-day and that of the "mid- victorian" era is the measure of the progress of the last fifty years. commerce and travel. another influence has also profoundly affected mod- ern art. while archaeology, books on the art of the past, and photography with all its allied arts, have placed before the designer a confusing wealth of suggestive material, commerce and travel have been breaking down the barriers between the arts of different peoples. the result has been a general universalizing of art, in the sense that the art of every people is made available to all others. provincial and national styles and char- acteristics therefore tend to disappear, or at least to become less conspicuous because of the admixture of influences and suggestions from other lands. only those characteristics survive which are most deeply rooted in the national habits, mode of life, climate and environment. a theater in new york may be much like one in buenos aires, a railway station in new zealand much like one in south africa, a church in algiers like one in marseilles. louis quinze furniture adorns new york drawing-rooms, some of it made in france in the eighteenth century, some of it made in new york or grand rapids in the twentieth. persian rugs and chinese carpets cover the floors of mansions in a history of ornament five continents. the postage-stamps and bank-notes of half the world are engraved in new york. the sharp distinctions that once divided the decorative styles of different peoples have largely disappeared, and the de- signer of to-day is forced to be an eclectic. the forms of so many lands and ages are thrust upon him that he cannot, if he would, ignore the art either of the past or of other lands, and among them he must choose. under these conditions the remarkable thing is that national and racial characteristics do assert themselves, and that the artist possessed of an original and creative mind can still, and often does, impress upon his work the stamp of his own personality and the quality of an original creation. he can do this not only when, like the art nouveau designers of europe or louis sullivan in america he casts all tradition into the discard, but even when, like the late h. h. richardson, he bases his design avowedly upon some phase of historic art. for originality inheres in the artist, not in his materials; it depends less upon the forms and details he uses than upon the way in which he uses them. and in spite of commerce, travel, books and photography, in spite of many labored imitations of the artistic products of one country by the designers of another, french decorative art to-day is easily distinguishable as a whole, from english art and german art, and american art from all of these. the roman revival and empire style. the first results of the archaeological discoveries and movements just described were seen in the closing years the modern revivals of the th century in the effort to reproduce as literally as possible the stately grandeur of roman buildings by .prefixing roman corinthian porticoes to all sorts of buildings and even, as in the church of san francesco da paola at naples, by imitating an entire structure—in this case the pantheon, thomas jefferson's attempted adaptation of the design of the maison carree at nimes to the requirements of the new state capitol at rich- mond, va., and of the pantheon to those of a college library at charlottesville, va., and the mansion house and later the royal exchange at london, illustrate this tendency on both sides of the atlantic. but it was in france, under the romanizing rule of the emperor napoleon, that it asserted itself most forcibly between and . the madeleine, the arc du carrousel and the colonne vendome, the portico of the corps legislatif (now chambre des deputes) and the bourse, were under his inspiration made as roman as possible. all this was purely imitative architecture. in the in- teriors, however, the gallic originality asserted itself in decorative details and furniture inspired, it is true, by a romanized taste, but employing roman motives in a new spirit and with considerable elegance of effect (see pi. ix, ; figure ). for this result the associated architects, percier and fontaine, were chiefly respon- sible. walls were hung not with pictorial but with conventionally-figured tapestries in sober colors. furni- ture passed from the classical lightness of the louis seize style into a phase of classical massiveness, more sparsely adorned with ornaments of gilded bronze than under louis xvi (pi . ix, , , , , ; figure ). a history of ornament the imperial emblems, the eagle, the bee, the n in a laurel wreath, the palm of victory and traditional roman ornaments, were used with discretion, always on a dark ground. the sphinx, lion's paw and symbolic fio. .—empire chair, sphinx, footstool and pilaster. grotesques appear. the whole effect is formal, stately, massive, sober and undeniably refined, but lacking in charm and domesticity (figure ; figs. , ). the style passed into italy and germany and later the modern revivals to the united states, where between and duncan phyfe and his successors and imitators adopted its forms rather than its richer ornaments, in chairs, fio. .—empire ornaments: (a) from bed in grand trianon, versailles; (b) from tarle. sideboards, tables and clocks still to be seen in uninter- rupted use in old houses, and now sought for american museums (figure ). the biedermeyer style. partly accompanying, partly following the empire influence in germany, there was developed in furniture a modification of the empire style known as the bieder- meyer style. the name is not that of its inventor nor of any real person; it was a purely fictitious name for "the man in the street." those who developed the style thus dubbed were seeking to substitute painted orna- ment and cheap materials for the gilt bronze and ma- hogany and ebony of the french models. the products of this movement varied greatly in quality from clumsy simplicity to a certain elegance of form and decoration, often with painted floral ornaments of no little beauty on a black background. a history of ornament the greek revival, - . the causes that led to the archaeological revivals of the nineteenth century have already been explained. the greek revival was the second of these to take form, and it received its first impetus in england, al- though as early as the brandenburger thor had been built by langhans in berlin, in feeble imitation of the athenian propylaea. the results in england were on the whole disappointing, although a number of dig- nified facades to public buildings show a conscientious effort to adapt greek forms to modern uses. these, however, belong rather to the history of architecture than to that of ornament. the lack of decorative sculpture and the general poverty of the ornament are noticeable. the best british works in this respect are perhaps two monuments of small size in edinburgh, to robert burns and to dugald stewart, both based on the choragic monument of lysicrates at athens, and both having distinct decorative value. the great st. george's hall at liverpool is more roman than greek in style and interior decoration, though the pilasters of the flanks are derived from the internal piers of the apollo temple at didyme near miletus. the fine doorway and bronze doors by cockerell are the finest example of the effort to produce a modernized greco- roman style of ornament by any english architect (figure ). but the british taste and spirit were in general too far removed from the greek, and creative originality was at too low an ebb, for the production of any considerable amount of decorative design based on the modern revivals greek models. the best was usually that which copied most closely actual greek details. in germany the movement was less general, being confined chiefly to the work of two or three men in ber- lin and munich in the middle third of the century. but these were gifted men, possessed of a modicum, at least, of independent imagination, and they sought to adapt rather than to copy. the decorative details, internal as well as external, of some of their works possess elegance and charm, being original designs in the greek spirit. among the finest works of the greatest of these design- ers—schinkel of berlin, von klenze of munich and hansen of vienna—were a number of buildings erected in athens for the academy, university and museum (figure ). the french neo-grec. in france, thanks to the dominating influence of the iscole des beaux-arts, with its strongly classic roman traditions, the greek movement never took the form of an archaeological revival. but three successive winners of the "prix de rome"—j. f. duban in , h. p. f. labrouste in and l. j. due in —together sought to introduce into their work something of the crispness and delicacy of greek art, and developed what came near to being a new style, to which some writers have given the name of neo-grec. these men broke away from the stereotyped rules of the prevailing academic style, invented new profiles and combinations of moldings, pilaster-caps, consoles and balusters, and developed new forms of window-treatment and a some- the modern revivals fro. a.—details from palais de fig. . — console justice, paris. west front, palais de justice, paris. fio. .—detail, stair-balustrade in palais de justice, paris. the modern revivals exterior polychromy; the paintings on the f ronl of the church had at last to be scraped off, and the experiment left no lasting results in french architectural decora- tion. even the polychrome effects attempted by gar- fio. .—details from houses in paris. nier in the facade of the opera by the use of rich colored marbles and gilding long ago lost their original values and faded into the general gray tonality of the whole. a history of ornament the gothic revival. while one group of revivalists in great britain was championing the study and imitation of greek art as the only means of artistic reform, another group was even more energetically advocating the restoration of the gothic styles. this group was led by the elder pugin, whose successive books on english gothic architecture, followed by several books by his son augustus welby pugin in the same vein, were powerful agents in awakening the british public to the glories of their national medieval art. gothic architecture was advocated as being both english and christian; greek and roman models were "foreign" and "pagan" and therefore unworthy of imitation. as with the greek advocates, it was the forms, not the underlying prin- ciples that were studied at first. architecture and decorative art were to be reformed by the use of pointed arches, tracery, finials and crockets and gothic orna- ments, irrespective of materials, methods of construc- tion, or purpose. in this medievalistic revival john ruskin ( - ) exerted a powerful influence by his lectures, his books and his personal influence. possessed of a deeply religious nature, an intense hatred of all sham and pre- tense, an artistically sensitive spirit, with a tinge of puritan mysticism, he was strongly drawn to the art of the middle ages, above all that of italy, where he repeatedly made long sojourns, especially in venice. 'augustus pugin, a french tmigri to england ( - ). "specimens of gothic architecture, ; examples of gothic archi- tecture, ; gothic ornaments, . a history of ornament john ruskin, who had been castigating the british in- difference to art, which he allied closely to religious faith, had in several works expressed enthusiasm for the italian gothic style, especially that of venice; and the later gothicists began to borrow freely details and sug- gestions from the italian. as that was preeminently a derived style, which applied the borrowed forms of the northern gothic as a purely superficial dress, it lent itself easily to the purposes of the english gothicists, especially for secular buildings. in figure it is easy to recognize many italian gothic features. the famous and much criticized albert memorial in london by sir gilbert scott (figure ) is based in large measure on orcagna's altar in or san michele at flor- ence. in church architecture the gothicists could follow northern gothic models more closely, and here they developed in time considerable freedom of design. the earlier examples of decorative detail were more strictly archzeological in character,—closer copies of actual medieval details—than in the later work. the perpen- dicular style at first found especial favor, as in the im- posing houses of parliament but as the understanding of the true principles and historical evolution of the gothic styles advanced, the perpendicular came to be regarded as a style of the decline, and the early eng- lish and decorated styles, modified by suggestions from both the french and italian gothic, found greater favor, as in exeter college chapel at oxford, st. wilfrid's at york, etc. the later works of the century show increasing independence of historic precedent. in charles l. eastlake, son of a painter of some the modern revivals note and himself an artist and art-critic, published a volume entitled "hints on household taste," followed soon after by another on the history of the gothic re- vival in england. these two volumes, especially the first, exerted so strong an influence on british taste in matters of furniture and domestic art that there ensued a movement known as the eastlake, looking to the creation of a new style in furniture and interior woodwork. two main principles were fundamental in the movement: that design should be based on construc- tion and material, and that as far as the first principle permitted, gothic models should be followed or at least studied for suggestion and inspiration, especially for decorative detail. the rather singular style that re- sulted became popular, was commercialized, and after a few years died out, having run its course (fig. ). the trouble with this, as with so many other movements of attempted reform, was that principles were expected to take the place of artistic ability and creative origi- nation. the furniture that was produced, however faithful to the principles laid down, was stiff, often ugly, lacking in grace or beauty of line, and quite destitute of any right to be called gothic. nevertheless the move- ment did good in abating much of the hideousness of british interiors of the preceding period and in instilling the idea of honest construction and expression of ma- terial; it crossed the ocean and played its part in the early years of the artistic awakening in the united states of - . the net results of the victorian gothic movement in england were chiefly three: first, the slow develop- a history of ornament ment of a new national style of church architecture; secondly, the realization that gothic details are ill- suited to the purposes of modern secular architecture; thirdly, the revival of various crafts and art-industries, especially those of carving, metal-work and stained glass. fro. .—an eastlake sideroard. in germany there was a feeble echo of the english movement, confined chiefly to ecclesiastical architecture, as in the votivkirche at vienna, a somewhat similar church at munich and a few others. but the movement never became truly national, and on the decorative side may be dismissed without further mention. its most the modern revivals important fruit was the completion of cologne cathe- dral and of the spires of the minster at ulm and of the cathedral of ratisbon (regensburg). in the field of secular architecture the one outstanding monument of germanic neo-gothic design is the costly and impressive parliament house at budapest, by steindl (about - ). in france the movement, under the powerful lead- ership of viollet-le-duc was mainly archaeological. it resulted in the restoration of many decayed and decay- ing buildings, the erection of a few churches of severe archaeological correctness of style, {e.g. ste. clothilde at paris and the bonsecours church near rouen), and above all, through v.-le-duc's monumental "diction- naire raisonne," in a new understanding of medieval gothic architecture as a style based on the logic of con- struction. the remarkable illustrations in this work did more than any other agency except that of photography to disseminate a clear understanding of the significance and beauty of gothic detail. both the greek and the gothic revivals had their birth, as we have seen, in wholly mistaken conceptions of architecture itself and of the relation of art to life. the greek movement was extinct by . the gothic movement lasted in england to the end of the century, and indeed still persists in church architecture and all the arts of the church: of this more in the next chapter. in secular architecture it was losing ground by , eugene fimanuel viollet-le-duc, - . * dictionnaire raisonne de l'architecture francaise du v au xvii siecle, paris, . a history of ornament when alfred waterhouse, one of its chief advocates, shifted to the romanesque for the inspiration of his design for the natural history museum at south kensington, and george edmund street was demon- strating by an awful example the unfitness of the gothic for modern civic architecture in the new law courts in london. like the greek revivalists, the leaders of the anglo-gothic revival were men of fine culture and thorough scholarship. but scholarship alone cannot take the place of artistic inspiration and correct principles of design: it may even hamper origi- nality and fetter inspiration. the renaissance revival. meanwhile, during the second half and especially the last quarter of the century, there was developing a new interest in the monuments and spirit of the renaissance, not only in england but throughout europe and america as well. the revival of the renaissance style in france, with its brilliant results in the new louvre, the new opera house (pi. xviii, , , and figure ) and the new h tel-de-ville in paris, strongly in- fluenced architectural design and decoration on the con- tinent, and gradually made itself felt in england, es- pecially in civic architecture. during the last half of the century france was confessedly the leader in artistic design in all fields. in architecture, even the most ordinary street architecture, there is evident a touch of refinement, a finish of detail and often a spark of origi- nality, such as no other country could show. fig. presents a variety of details from what may be called the modern revivals fig. .—details of paris street architecture, nineteenth centtjry. a history of ornament the vernacular street architecture of paris of this period. in ceramics and textiles there was a like superiority to the rest of europe. the leaders in this revival in france were visconti, lefuel and garnier. the result in england was a somewhat peculiar but interesting de- velopment, in such buildings as the imperial institute fio. .—detail, city bank ladyhill, ry collcutt, . at south kensington, the town hall at oxford and many town halls and public buildings elsewhere, and in a fashion of house and school design curiously miscalled the queen anne style. in this development the classic details of the renaissance were modified and combined 'louis t. g. visconti, born at rome, , died at paris, ; designer with hector m. lefuel ( - ) of the new ixmvre. lefuel was richard m. hunt's preceptor. charles garnier, architect of the opera, was born in , died . the modern revivals under the english love for picturesque and irregular masses, turrets, varied roof-lines and small parts. the results were often exceedingly interesting, highly- original, sometimes charming (figs. , ). this was not, like its greek and gothic predecessors, an effort to revive textually a dead style, but a sin- cere effort to draw in- spiration from the his- toric past without copying, and to adapt the suggestions of the past to the special needs of the present. architecture was now better understod than at the outset of the revivals; it was once more becoming a vital art, closely related to modern life. the mul- tiplication of museums and schools, on both sides of the channel and of the ocean, was providing the technical training without which design can only limp along its path, and which in older days had been provided by the system of apprenticeship under great masters. fio. .- -a scotch town hall, ry r. sanoii.ands. a history of ornament the nature movement. in the mid-victorian period, about , the british public began to realize that in many lines of industry the british products were outclassed by the continental, especially the french, because of the superior artistic quality of the foreign products. the lack of museums and schools of industrial art was felt to be one reason for the inferiority of the british manufacturers, es- pecially in the field of textiles and ceramics. the establishment of the great south kensington mu- seum, with its library and schools, was the first step towards filling this want ( ), and was followed by the establishment of many "provincial" schools and museums. for some time an underlying principle of the training in these schools seems to have been that of recourse to nature, especially to the vegetable world, for suggestions of decorative design. historic ornament was also taught, but the chief inspiration was sought in the forms of leaves and flowers, which were to be dissected, analyzed, recombined and treated either naturalistically or con- ventionally, but always from the point of view of deco- rative composition. this movement had some echo in france and germany (figs. , ). the last half- dozen plates of owen jones's "grammar of orna- fio. .—a french floral wall-paper. the modern revivals ment," published in , are devoted to various types of flowers and foliage from nature, appropriate for ornament. in france the "flore ornementale" of ruprich-robert, published as late as , performed the same task in more elaborate fashion. the results were not equal to expectation, for the emphasis was laid too much on the plant-forms and not enough on training in the fundamentals of decorative fio. .—a german floral plate-border. design, in which the source of the motives used is less important than the way in which they are used. never- theless there was, on the whole, a decided gain. any sincere effort after greater beauty, even along mistaken lines, is pretty sure to open the eyes of the seeker and to develop his power of artistic appreciation. the monstrosities of perverted pictorial naturalism in car- pets, cretonnes, ceramics and wall-papers of an earlier day began to give way before a better mastery of the principles of decorative composition. other influences aided this progress: the increasing importation of chi- a history of ornament nese and japanese and east indian textiles, bronzes and ceramics and rugs, the multiplication of museums of industrial art, a more intelligent study of historic ornament, the great international exhibitions of london ( and ), paris ( and ), and finally in england the arts-and-crafts movement. this was the outgrowth of an enterprise initiated by the poet-socialist william morris in , which had as its aim a return to the old-time relation between design and execution, and the restoration of hand-craftsman- ship in place of machine production. wall-papers, furniture, stained glass and especially textiles were the objects to which attention was at first directed by the band of artisans and amateurs gathered and led by morris (pi. xix, , ). later he found in the printer's art a field for careful design of types and the treatment of the page as an artistic design in itself, producing many beautiful books in his "kelmscott press." the indirect results of morris's preaching and practice were more important than the direct. it was impossible to overthrow the modern system of mass- production and machine-processes. the works of the morris coterie could not be produced nor sold except at prices far above the reach of the masses, but the move- ment greatly stimulated the interest of the public in the products of handicraft, with the result that many old handicrafts have since then been revived, and that thousands of individuals have been led to design and execute with their own hands all sorts of artistic objects the modern revivals —textiles, book-covers, laces and embroideries, ceramics, jewelry and the like. this has reacted on the general public taste as well as on the quality of machine- products in the industrial arts. these are in general to-day vastly superior to those of the first three-quarters of the th century in almost every field of design (see pp. , ). plates xix and xxi illustrate some of these results. an interesting episode of the movement outside of the morris enterprise was an earlier effort of john ruskin to persuade the architects to substitute crafts- men's designing of architectural detail for that of the architects' office in the new museum at oxford. the carvers of the capitals in this building were allowed to design their own capitals from the flowers and foliage of the neighborhood, after the fashion of the medieval builders. the results were interesting, but it must be confessed that they were, after all, mediocre, for the carvers had never been trained to original design. yet the experiment was worth trying, and is worth repeat- ing, if only it can be continued long enough to train the carvers in the principles of decorative design. it was, indeed, repeated some years later in new york by p. b. wight, in the old academy of design (demolished ), with much the same result (see p. ). the difficulty lies in the fact that artisanship in the execution of a craft does not in itself imply or confer the ability to design. but this is not a very serious difficulty and would disappear if only the trade itself in each artistic craft were to set resolutely about providing for its mem- bers the necessary training in design. this is precisely a history of ornament i fio. . — detail from a german carinet in berlin, . fio. .—german communion wine-flaoon, . what the old-time guilds were accustomed to do. the modern craft of architectural modelers, now growing to increasing importance as an intermediary between the architect's paper design and the executed carving, a history of ornament this condition of things is greatly deplored by those who cling to the idea that distinctive national styles are in themselves essential to the production of good art. a more philosophical view recognizes in this universal- izing or commonizing of styles and in the eclecticism of modem design necessary and inevitable conditions in- separable from our present civilization; and in our modern design, whether in the major or minor arts, the clear expression of these conditions. this broader view seeks to discover, and to some extent does discover, national and racial differences not in the use of particu- lar shapes, forms and combinations such as formerly defined a style, but in subtler distinctions of character and spirit. where such distinctions are not discover- able, we are in the presence of products of a kind com- mon to several or all civilized nations; as for instance, in many textiles like brocades, velvets and carpets pro- duced by machinery and often in designs taken with little or no change from the past (see pi. xxiii). thus a florentine renaissance velvet, a persian or chinese carpet, may be textually reproduced on a power-loom in england or france or germany or the united states with no discoverable characteristic of the country of its production. books recommended: a. barqui: l'architecture rnoderne en france (baudry, paris, ).—l. a. boileau: les preludes de varchitecture duxxe steele (fischbacher, paris, ).—c. daly: l'archi- tecture privee au xixe siecle (daly, paris, ).—c. l. eastt.ake, jr.: the gothic revival (longmans, london, ) ; hints on household taste in furniture, etc. (long- the modern revivals mans, london, ).—f. v. feldegg: moderne kirchen~ dekorationen (schroll, vienna, ).—c. garnier: le nouvel opéra (morel, paris, ).—c. p. gourlier: choix d'édifices publics (colas, paris, - ).—w. hessling: ameuble- ment et décoration, style empire (beazley, paris, ).— t. g. jackson: modern gothic architecture (king, london, ).—krafft et ransonnette: maisons et hotels à paris, - (lib. art et déc, paris, ).—p. lafond: l'art décoratif et le mobilier sous la république et l'empire (renouard, paris, ).—liénard: l'ornementation du xixe siècle (liénard, liège, ).—w. lurke: geschichte der neueren baukunst (berlin, ).—f. luthmer: malerische innenraume moderner wohnungen (keller, frank- fort, ).—lutzow und tischler: wiener neubauten (lehman, vienna, ).—muthesius: die neuere kirchliche baukunst in england (ernst, berlin, ).—f. narjoux: monuments élevés par la vule de paris, - (morel, paris, ).—l. m. normand: part* moderne, ou choix de maisons, etc. (normand, paris, ).—a. e. richardson: monumental classical architecture in great britain and ireland (batsford, london, ).—h. ruckwardt: façaden und détails moderner bauten (claesen, berlin, ).—h. h. statham: modern architecture (scribners, new york, ). chapter xiv the nineteenth centuey in america it was inevitable that every movement of art in europe should in time reach the united states. al- though transatlantic communication by sail was slow, it was constant; and as the states of the young republic were dependent on the old world for almost everything of an artistic character, they could not fail to reflect sooner or later each phase of artistic development that occurred in europe, especially in england and france. the first evidence of the french influence is seen in the work of thomas jefferson ( - ), who was at once a statesman and an architect. while much of his work, e.g. at monticello and charlottesville (va.), was based on book-knowledge, especially of palladio, he brought back from his sojourn of four years in france ( - ) a great admiration for the maison carree at nimes, which he made the basis of his design for the virginia state capitol at richmond, under the influence of that classic revival in france which was maturing under louis xvi and was to develop under napoleon into the roman revival of the empire (see pp. , ). through the closing years of the th and open- ing years of the th century there followed a certain mingling and confusion of influences: the delicate adam-like detail of the later "georgian" or post- • i figure . american nineteenth cen- tury furniture. nineteenth century in america walter in the old mint and girard college at phila- delphia. the greek details were used with more freedom than generally in europe, especially in the handling of window-openings and superposed stories. the decora- tive detail was restrained but in good taste; but the lack of sculptural adornment made itself felt as a serious blemish here as in england. the style spread rapidly, so that by not only churches but private houses were designed with greek details, which displaced all others as the architectural vernacular of the carpenter and house-builder. there was much pleasing detail in the common molding profiles and modest carved ornaments of ordinary houses and small churches. sometimes the proportions of doric and ionic columns were altered to fit a purely wooden construction: more often not, out of regard rather to the tradition of a style which does not easily lend itself to radical change of proportion, than for any abstract logic as to the expression of material. figure and fig. illustrate the style as it worked out in doorways and interior details. there was also not a little good ironwork in railings, balconies, etc., in which greek details were used with good taste. the gothic revival. there was no background of gothic tradition in the united states on which to found a revival of the style, though pointed arches were sometimes used for windows of colonial and early republican churches, especially under dutch influence. the movement, when started a history of ornament by the building of trinity church in new york in by the english architect richard upjohn, had little vitality, and was chiefly confined to the architecture of episcopal churches. except for the excellent work of a few gifted men—the elder upjohn and his son rich- ard m., james renwick and f. c. withers—there was little merit in the attempts at gothic design. there were no craftsmen to execute good detail, except a few who came over from england and scotland, and the style was not understood by the people nor by architects generally other than those mentioned above. lath-and- plaster and painted pine liberally sanded, in place of vaulting and honest masonry, made a travesty of most of the efforts in the style, especially in secular archi- tecture. even the best work in this style in secular buildings was singularly uninteresting (fig. ). two buildings in this field stood out, however, as excep- tionally honest and interesting efforts to adapt the style to modern secular uses. the academy of design in new york by p. b. wight ( , demolished about ) drew its inspiration from the venetian gothic, and was a remarkably well-studied and intelligent adap- tation of the style (pi. xxii, ). two of the capitals were designed by the imported stone-carvers them- selves, from suggestions of the local flora, as was done in the new museum at oxford a few years earlier, (see ante, p. ). the results were very much the same, interesting but not so beautiful as to cause repe- tition of the experiment elsewhere. the capitals de- signed by the architect and executed by english carvers were better (figure ). the second of these "secular r - , i figuee . geeek revival dooeway, figuee . gothic business build- south fifth ave., new yoek. ino, boston ..r. { nineteenth century in america gothic" buildings was the state capitol at hartford, conn., in which the younger upjohn in - en- deavored to devise an american adaptation of the gothic style to secular uses. apart from its merits and defects as architecture, the effort is interesting but not inspiring. the deviations from historical precedent in the detail were seldom improvements, and it was again shown that personal innovations in style have no vitality unless they reflect something in the movement of the public taste. in st. patrick's cathedral in new york, mr. j. ren- wick frankly combined details and suggestions drawn from french, english and german gothic prototypes, without attempting to adapt or "americanize" them. the blending, as symbolic of the three nations from which at that time ( - ) the american catholic population was chiefly drawn, was managed with gen- eral good taste. there are a few other churches in new york, brooklyn, boston and philadelphia in which gothic details are used with intelligence and taste. the "civil war" period. the general condition of taste during the period from to in the united states was lower than at any time before or since. in every department of life there was a deplorable lack of knowledge or appreciation of the fine arts, and of opportunities for training in any of the arts. in the industrial arts we depended wholly upon importations from europe. the domestic furni- ture was heavy, dull, pretentious and ugly, predomi- nantly of black walnut. interior decoration consisted nineteenth century in america in american art. the revelation which it made to a million or two of americans of the art of the old world created a profound impression, shaking the complacency of the nation and arousing a popular interest, hitherto lacking, in art as a factor in everyday life. to this awakening a number of concurrent circumstances con- tributed powerfully. the nation, recovering from the disastrous panic of , was entering on an era of great prosperity, due to the opening up of the "great west." travel to europe was rapidly increasing in volume, and returning travelers, like the roman hosts returning from their campaigns in greece, were bring- ing back objects of art from europe and, above all, new conceptions and ideals of artistic beauty. three schools of architecture had been established, at boston, ithaca (n. y.) and urbana ( .); and by four others, at new york, philadelphia, syracuse and cam- bridge (mass.). the art museums of new york and boston were established during the 'seventies. several architects of great ability and strong personality at last found appreciation by a public which had begun to learn the difference between good and bad art. american students in increasing numbers resorted to the paris ficole des beaux-arts, bringing back new standards of planning, construction and draftsmanship in architec- ture and a new appreciation of painting and sculpture. we began to attain success in domesticating various industrial and decorative arts—in ceramics, in textiles, in furniture, metal work, mural painting, stained glass, etc. the first of these arts to attract attention abroad was our silverware (tiffany, gorham, whiting, etc.): figure . four capitals ry p. b. wight for academy of design, new york (demolished). nineteenth century in america trinity church in boston ( - ), richardson's first important masterpiece, displayed internally the first serious effort at systematic decoration by mural paint- ing and stained glass, under the direction of john lafarge. figs. , and figures , illus- trate characteristic examples of richard- sonian ornament. re- flections of his influ- ence are illustrated in pi. xxii, , , . fio. .—carvkd detail, harvard uni- versity law school, ry richardson. independent develop- ments. while the style and influence of richard- son's work were domi- nant in the field of architecture, they had little effect on interior decoration elsewhere than in the buildings erected by richardson and his followers. the awakened taste of this period expressed itself in various in- dependent fashions in the work of particular groups and individuals. one group, calling themselves "the associated artists," under the leadership of l. c. tiffany, produced interesting effects by the ingenious use of all sorts of materials and processes, mattings, glass rings, brass rings, hand-forged nails, stained wood, hammered metal, painted burlap and other singular and novel materials, besides needlework and stained glass a history of ornament and mosaic. the result was a species of "art nouveau," long anticipating the french movement, and drawing inspiration impartially from japanese, moorish, by- zantine and medieval art and the artist's inner con- sciousness (company rooms in seventh regiment armory; curtain of the madison square theater, long ago demolished). much of this decoration was beauti- ful, but its beauty depended wholly upon the taste and ability of the associated artists, not upon any principle of style, and the movement soon expired, like the rich- ardsonian, under the growing dominance of renaissance inspiration. other individualistic influences were noticeable in the work of caryl coleman, which revealed a strong japa- nese inspiration, and in the silver work of tiffany, gorham and whiting, borrowing suggestions from east indian, american indian and nature sources, handled with great skill. the bryant vase of silver by tiffany (c. l. tiffany, father of l. c. tiffany, previously men- tioned) now in the century club and exhibited in at philadelphia, represents an effort to combine natural- istic ornament based on american flowers with the classic form of the vase itself. there was developed a style of interior woodwork at this time which shows a curious blending of eastlake severity of construction with a kind of denatured japanesque carving. it ap- pears singularly out-of-date and naive to modern eyes, but it shows a sincere effort to break away from the banality and vulgar ostentation of the preceding "black walnut" period. technical skill and a new craftsmanship were de- nineteenth century in america veloping under these influences. carving, stained glass, bronze-founding, artistic work in wrought-iron were all carried on with increasing success. in wall-papers, carpets, silks and brocades the native producers were achieving a real artistic progress, though still largely dependent on foreign-born artisans and craftsmen for the execution of their designs. the neo-classic movement. with richardson's death in the vogue of his style began to decline. its success was largely due-to its author's personal genius; his followers, though sev- eral of them possessed ability, were unable to equal the merit of his designs, especially as new currents of taste were developing under the influences already men- tioned. the coup-de-grdce to the style was adminis- tered by the columbian exhibition of at chicago. in the festival architecture of this "white city" a number of architects collaborated in producing an ensemble of buildings in various versions of renais- sance or neo-classic styles, as being best suited to a monumentally decorative effect. the powerful influence of the late c. f. mckim ( - ) and his partners; of the late r. m. hunt ( - ); of the sculptor saint gaudens ( - ), and of the young architects trained in paris and in the american schools, together with an increasing public acquaintance with european, classic and renaissance art, all combined to favor the general acceptance of renaissance types and ideas. the superior fitness of the architectural and decorative forms of the so-called classic and neo-classic styles for g a history of ornament modern requirements found increasing recognition, especially for civic and monumental architecture. the development of the decorative arts based on the tradi- tions of the renaissance was stimulated, after the chicago exhibition, by the erection of two important buildings in which mural decoration by distinguished painters was made of nearly equal importance with the architecture—the public library in boston and the congressional library in washington ( ). the development of decorative art in the united states since the completion of those buildings in the closing decade of the th century will be discussed in another chapter. important contributing elements in the improvement and decorative enrichment of architecture were, among other things: the increasing use and high technical de- velopment of terra-cotta; the opening up of new quar- ries of limestone and marble of superior quality; the increasing supply of capable craftsmen—carvers, metal- workers, mosaic-workers, etc.; the new effects possible in stained glass with the opalescent, mottled, and irregu- lar-surfaced glasses available, thanks largely to the in- ventions and processes of mr. l. c. tiffany and the power and originality of the designs of john lafarge, the work of the brothers lamb (all in new york), and the progress made in decorative and monumental sculp- ture by a group constantly increasing of native or nat- uralized american sculptors (french, mcmonies, saint gaudens, ward, bitter, etc.) and of thoroughly trained foreign craftsmen and a few of their american pupils. in this connection mention should be made of ellen and nineteenth century in america kitson in boston, who had come over from england in the 'sixties and were associated in the carved work in wight's academy of design in new york; and of the decorative influence of the introduction of terra-cotta for the embellishment of important buildings, in the old (now demolished) museum of fine arts in boston in (pi. xxii, ). books recommended: g. brown: history of the united states capital (gov't printing office, washington, ).—j. w. dow: the ameri- can renaissance (comstock, new york, ).—p. graef: neubauten in nordamerika (berlin, n. d.).—f. kimrall: thomas jefferson, architect (privately printed, boston, ).—lamreth and manning: thomas jefferson, architect and designer of landscapes (houghton, new york, ).— j. mackson: american architectural interiors and furniture of latter part of th century (polley, boston, ).— monographs of american architecture (amer. architect co., boston, - ).—m. schuyler: american architecture (harper's, new york, ).—stevens and corr: examples of american domestic architecture (comstock, new york, ).—m. g. van rensselaer: h. h. richardson and his works (houghton, boston, ).—f. r. vogel: das amerv- kanische haus (wasmuth, berlin, ). (for the decorative arts of the th century in america the reader should consult the architectural and trade periodicals.) chapter xv the twentieth century: europe and america during the first fourteen years of the present century the arts of europe continued in the paths they were following during the last decade of the nineteenth. in all northern and western europe there was a general prevalence of the forms and styles of the renaissance, revived in each country generally along the lines of its own previous national renaissance, with a greater or less admixture of the french influence and here and there of naturalistic and of neo-gothic forms. in other words, the decorative arts were mildly eclectic, with the renaissance influence on the whole predominant. in so far as historic styles were followed, they were treated with freedom and intelligence. the "art nouveau" movement. along with this general current of renaissance in- fluence, however, there had developed, during the clos- ing years of the th century, a fairly strong current of independent design, as a protest against what was called "the slavish imitation of the dead past," "adherence to outworn formulae," "the blind following of tradition." the movement appears to have started in france, but was almost immediately taken up with enthusiasm in germany, austria and belgium, and to a much less t the twentieth century extent in great britain. it was called by various names —art nouveau or new art; moderne kunst or mod- ern art; the secession; independent art; and was to a considerable extent associated with the arts-and-crafts movement. it dealt at first only with architecture and the industrial arts, but spread soon to painting, sculp- ture and music, giving birth to post-impressionism, cubism and other singular recent developments of ec- centricity and extravagance. starting about in paris with the striking poster designs of cheret and grasset, it made its first appear- ance as a concerted movement in the paris exposition of , in furniture, jewelry, and vases, and in the architecture of many of the exhibition buildings. these works, widely differing in style and in merit revealed as their common underlying motive two controlling pur- poses: (a) the avoidance or ignoring of all historic styles and traditional forms, and (b) the expression of per- sonality. thus the movement was characterized by "the negative strength of protest rather than the affirmative strength of a vital principle. its lack of cohesion is seen in the division of its adherents into groups, some looking to nature for inspiration, while others decry this as a mistaken quest; some seeking to emphasize structural lines and others to ignore them altogether." "the re- sults ... as a rule have been most successful in small objects; jewelry, silverware, vases and small furniture. ... in the field of the larger objects of design, in which the dominance of traditional form and of structural considerations is proportionally more imperious, the struggle to evade these restrictions becomes more diffi- a history of ornament cult, and results in more obvious and disagreeable ec- centricities, which the greater size and permanence of the object tend further to exaggerate." the more extreme manifestations of this movement in architecture and interior decoration are equally destitute of grace and propriety. they demonstrate the importance of tradition and of structural fitness as restraints upon unregulated fancy or "originality," the ab- sence of these restraints being responsible for most of the absurdities of these designs. on the other hand, the beauty of many of the results in jewelry, ce- ramics and the minor arts, in which con- struction and tradition fio. .—lady's jeweled comr ry „ lauque. are ot less importance, has been as notable as its general failure in architecture. the jewelry of lalique (fig. ), the vases and lamps of jean dampt and of the belgian meunier, the posters and sculptural decorations of cheret, the stained glass and ironwork of the belgians (e.g. of victor horta, fig. ), and innumerable typographical and textile deco- rations by german, french and other designers, have proved how possible it is to break away from tradi- quoted from my "history of architecture," pp. - , ed. (long- mans, and green, new york). the twentieth century tion in these fields of design and still produce beautiful effects of line and form (pi . xx). particularly notice- able is the frequent recurrence of what may be called the "whiplash" line (fig. ), not only in flat linear patterns but also in the lines of draperies and sinuously posed fe- male figures in jewelry, lamps, vases, etc. in architecture, more- over, there have been ex- ceptions to the general eccentricity and extrava- gance of the movement. its most distinguished ex- ponent in austria, the late otto wagner, pro- fessor in the former im- perial school of art at vienna (d. ), pro- duced a number of build- ings in which distinction of general form and pro- portion were maintained and all mere eccentricity was carefully avoided. the detail, though sometimes eccentric, is in his work generally reasonable and elegant (pi. xx, , ). most of the paris exhibition buildings in were anti-traditional in composition rather than in decora- fio. .—window ry v. horta, brussels. the twentieth century which was also a movement of protest against classic tradition, it is interesting to observe how largely both movements expressed themselves in sinuous lines, in waving and contrasted curves, and in efforts to avoid straight lines, right angles, and rigidly structural forms. eclecticism in europe. the influence of the art nouveau movement was not strong enougn to change the entire course of the arts. alongside of its most conspicuous monuments of archi- tecture and monumental decoration others were being produced at the same time based upon the historic styles. it is difficult if not impossible to improve upon the forms which centuries of human effort evolved for the solution of problems identical with many which the designer has to solve to-day. they serve the purposes of the modern designer so well that there can be no reason for reject- ing them except the desire for novelty. that desire must to a certain extent animate every creative mind; it is the spring and source of every advance that has been made in art. in the historic past, however, it has manifested itself not in wholesale rejection and absolute new-creation, but in gradual and almost insensible modi- fications of detail. new and expressive styles have grown up out of the accumulations of these minute changes, building always upon the established and fa- miliar tradition. violent innovations and purely per- * in this estimate and review of the art nouveau movement, written in , i find i have had to make no substantial change from that which i published nineteen years earlier in the "craftsman" of december, , in an article to which i refer the reader for a more detailed account of the early phases of the movement than the limits of this work will allow. it was published by the stickley co. in new york. a history of ornament imitation which avoids servile copying, do not make for that progress in creative design which is essential to vital art. the designers of the second class are those who draw suggestion and inspiration from historic models, but adapt and modify more or less freely what they borrow from the past. they value fitness to function, rational use of materials and intrinsic beauty of form above conformity to historic models. poor de- signers, then, adapt and modify badly, but the true artist adapts and modifies wisely and well, and thereby infuses into his work something of himself. this is the truer path of progress, alike in architecture and in the minor arts. it cannot be too often repeated, it cannot be too strongly urged upon the student and the profes- sional designer alike, that the merit of his work depends far less upon the style chosen or the historic elements he uses, than upon the way he uses them. no teaching of styles in the schools, and no recourse to nature her- self, will produce a good design, unless the designer be an artist and work into his design the artistic quality which comes from his own taste and imagination. the technical training can only lay the foundation upon which he must raise his own edifice of art. the beauty of the products of european studios, ateliers and factories, and their superiority, as a whole, to the corresponding american products as a whole, have been due to the more general recognition of these principles in europe. tradition, training, a wise eclec- ticism and the higher general level of artistic taste in europe and especially in france, account for the ex- cellence and artistic charm of so many of the products the twentieth century of both the fine and the industrial arts which come from the other side of the atlantic. eclecticism in the united states. it is only natural that twentieth-century decorative art in the united states should be eclectic. having no age-long traditions of our own in a land in which the decorative arts are but little over two centuries old at the furthest, and with no environment of ancient monu- ments and works of art to influence our design, we have been peculiarly open to divers influences and sugges- tions from foreign lands; as well to those that are sup- plied by books and photographs as to those derived from imported products of the various arts, or from travel abroad. there is no particular reason, in the nature of things, why the american designer should follow one style rather than another. none of them except the colonial and georgian has any special historic associa- tion with american life and culture, and the georgian suggestions and precedents have little to offer in the decorative arts outside of architecture and furniture. american indian art is a primitive and undeveloped art of very limited range and is, after all, as foreign to our culture—which is european in origin and type—as mohammedan or chinese art. yet even indian art may supply valuable suggestions for certain classes of design, especially in beadwork, blankets and basketry, and to some extent our designers have made use of these suggestions. it is the nearest approach to a genuine american "peasant" art. in all the arts, architectural and industrial, the the twentieth century widely known, were creating designs of a thoroughly personal and individual aspect (figs. , ; pi. xxiii, , , , ). during the twenty-two years since this eclectic freedom has taken on certain definite trends, both in fio. .—upper part of schiller building, chicago. architecture and the accessory and industrial arts. in architecture the trend is toward the medieval styles for ecclesiastical and collegiate buildings; and toward the renaissance styles for civic and commercial buildings. in domestic architecture there is the greatest possible a history of ornament variety, according to location, materials and personal taste, but even here we note an increasing prevalence of georgian types. in each of these general trends there are divided currents. many roman catholic churches are in an italo-lombard or basilican style; a strong greco-roman trend is observable in the more monumental sort of buildings such as museums, banks and libraries. in "sky-scrapers" all sorts of historic de- tails may be seen; here eclecticism is freest in the effort to find an appropriate dress in which to clothe the skele- ton of steel. thus in new york the west street and woolworth buildings are dressed in gothic details; the metropolitan tower and municipal building have been given an italian renaissance dress; others wear a plain business dress, as it were, with a minimum of decoration of renaissance type. of late there have been many successful applications of spanish plateresque and churrigueresque models, closely followed as in the cali- fornia building by goodhue in the san diego exhibi- tion (pi. xxiii, ); or freely adapted, as in the catholic church at fall river by r. a. cram (fig. ). but these "styles" relate only to the apparel of decorative detail. underlying this is the fundamental style of the building, due to its form, proportions, con- struction and planning, which could not by any means be mistaken for medieval or italian, greek, roman or french: and this underlying style is purely american. in all these modern american applications of the historic styles to modern purposes there is evidence of a freedom of handling, an intelligence of adaptation, which are far removed from the slavish copying and the a history of ornament affectation of archaeological correctness of the revivals of the last century. many of the works produced under this eclecticism are works of true originality. the historic-style details have served merely as an alphabet with which to express new ideas, new conceptions in a new language. pi. xxiii gives illustrations of inter- esting "historic" details from recent buildings. minor arts. in the minor arts the choice of form and detail is far wider than in architecture. oriental art, both from the near east, in rugs and embroideries, and from the far east, in fabrics, ceramics and bronzes, has supplied abundant suggestions to our designers (pi. xxi). the beginnings of the oriental influence may be traced back to the centennial at philadelphia. the multipli- cation of art museums in which not merely the major arts are represented but also the industrial and minor arts, has placed before our designers during this century a wealth of suggestion and resource previously un- imagined. commercial manufacturers as well as indi- vidual designers and craftsmen are more and more turn- ing to these splendid collections of art from the old world for suggestion and inspiration. the metropolitan museum of art, new york, has for some time maintained an organized system for the encouragement of artisans and designers in the indus- trial arts in making use of the collections in the museum for suggestions of decorative design, and annual exhibi- tions of their work and of the objects from which their designs have been drawn have proved the value of this a history of ornament italian iron-workers of the renaissance (figure , ). arts-and-crafts societies of various sorts are stimulat- ing the production of personally designed and executed work in jewelry, metal-work, book-binding and ceramics, and by these prizes and exhibitions are slowly educat- ing the taste of the public to appre- ciate^—and pay for—such personally designed and individual products. textile schools, silversmiths' schools and general schools of decorative de- sign or "applied art" are beginning to accomplish what the french, english and other european institu- tions have long since accomplished in the training both of designers and craftsmen. the improvement in taste and artistic capacity reacts on all the machine-industries, so that carpets, rugs, silks and brocades, x" u, ittt. /lv.uba- tive initial. silverware, laces and ceramics, pro- duced in quantities by machine proc- esses, are to-day of an artistic quality impossible of attainment twenty or even ten years ago. figure illustrates american metal-work of the last thirty years (except no. , which dates from about ), showing both free designs and designs based on the historic styles. figs. , , show typographic orna- ments taken from current periodicals. but the american taste, though eclectic, is conserva- tive; novel and singular designs are looked upon with the twentieth century doubtful favor; our people still prefer the styles they are accustomed to, and changes to new artistic ideals are only effected gradually. furniture. by far the greater part of the furniture now made in the united states is manufactured in great factories, widely scattered over the country, with an especially important group at grand rapids, mich. while the cheaper products of this system of manufacture possess no artistic merit whatever, many of these establishments have turned their attention to the making of fine furni- ture after historic models in various styles, employing highly paid craftsmen, chiefly foreign or foreign- trained, upon the finer details. the enormous impor- tations of old italian, flemish and french furniture of the th- th centuries to adorn the homes of rich amateurs and collectors, the fine collections in many museums, and the growing fashion, fad or craze for "period" rooms, have combined to stimulate the system- atic commercial reproduction of fine furniture-models of these centuries and styles, including our own colonial models. while there has been a certain amount of counterfeiting of "antique" pieces by unscrupulous craftsmen, the great and better-known establishments are not concerned in such frauds. and while there is more or less direct copying or reproduction of "antique" or historic pieces, advertised and sold as copies, there is also an increasing output of original designs in the his- toric styles. the best productions of this kind are of high quality, alike of design, construction and execu- the twentieth century textile design. much the same phenomena are observable in the field of artistic textiles. the great factories of the united states produce carpets and rugs in all the oriental styles; brocades and velvets reproducing the richest patterns of renaissance italy and france, printed fig. .—american drapery, fio. .—detail from an ameri- canterrury pattern. can ingrain rug. cretonnes, chintzes and hangings of all styles, and ma- chine tapestries and laces often of excellent design for interior decoration (figs. - ; pi. xxi, , , , , , ). not all the factory products, however, are copies or imitations of historic patterns, and there are a number of establishments for the weaving by hand of tapjstries designed by distinguished artists. the schools of decorative art, including schools of design maintained by the manufacturers themselves, have begun to provide a history of ornament american designers of ability, many of whom take their suggestions from nature, others from the work of the american indians, others again from the historic styles, lisa -«* «-a*fireback,nemyork.i y b-hsuenglandbnsfalftyrug drawing-room of langdon house, fbrhmoi/th n h-, ijdo iplate xyii french arctflornamentxlx-xxqenturies upper part of opera pans /s - " detail- pedime.nl in new louvre - s the gun du nord para €- the gathers museum - dookhtiy'arl mounau'style paris i oo rate xmx. english qrwament xk-mcenturiei modern curfain kef jz wm-morris texfi/e design a? wm morris tapestry design xxi. english and american color ornament, th century . rug or hanging, orinoka mills, new york. . wall-paper by walter crane, london. . stained glass by church decorating company, new york. . wall-hanging by walter crane. . rug or hanging by orinoka mills. . wall-paper by walter crane. . american rug, persian styles. . cloisonne candlestick by von lossberg. . american persian rug. . stained glass windows in studio of bolton and francis c. jones, new york. . cloisonne candlestick by von lossberg. . american silk brocade, cheney brothers company. . chair-back by stroheim and romann, new york. . american rug, chinese style. . american low cabinet, eclectic design. illustrations , , , , and are reproduced from adver- tisements in good furniture, and numbers , , , , , from illustrated articles in the same magazine. numbers , and are reproduced from advertising circulars of bigelow carpet company, hartford, connecticut. plate ml englisham> americancolor ornament a ~^^^^^^w\lwfcn if' "* si vylainakjtivmndov'^ijdiojbtfcjanes litbt>ar, t louis (walhedral iqdetod house at detmil,mica mi n*«ernunionbui^n^k jzcorn^ had**,* a^^ot.^a^, > ««,wftayj^, index index brescia, miracoli church , , , ( ) brick and stone: colonial ; french , ( , ) brieg, piastenschloss , briosco, andrea (archt.) , , briosco, benedetto di (archt.) brosse, salomon de (archt.) bruges, town-hall, brunelleschi, filippo (archt.) , , , , bruni, bruno, tomb in sta. croce , ( ) brussels: laces , ( ); tapes- tries bryant vase biickeburg, schloss: golden hall ceiling ; door , ( ) budapest, parliament house bullant, jean (archt.) buon, bartolomeo (bergamasco) (archt.) burghley house burgos: casa miranda, capitals ; cathedral, capilla de los reyes nuevos portal ; cathedral porta pellejeria ; stairway burns, robert, monument to burslem potteries , c cabinets, armoires, commodes: french , , , , , ( , , , ); italian , , caen, h tel d'ficoville caetano acosta (archt.) , caffieri, the (cbms.) , , ( ) california mission style california state building, san diego , cambridge (eng.): king's college chapel stalls ; trinity college hall ; chapel, library cambridge (mass.) vassall-craigie- longfellow house ( ) camera della segnatura in vatican, rome , , campidoglio, palaces on candelabrum forms , , ( , ) candelabrum shafts , , , , , , , , ( , ) cano, alonso (archt.) cantilever bracket , ( ) cantorie (music-balconies) , , ( ) capitals , ( , ); composite ; corinthianesque ; spanish , , ( , ) capitol at washington caprarola villa or palace, ceiling ( ); court arcade ; gafne , ( c); pilasters , ( ) cardinals of amboise, tomb of at rouen , , , ( ) carlo maderna (archt.) , , , carlone, michele (archt.) cartouches , , , ; ( , , ) carvings, wren's style, london ( - ) cary house, batavia (n. y.), door- way order ( ) caryatides, tribune of the, louvre casa caracci, bologna, window ( ) casa de las conchas, salamanca cnsa de monterey, salamanca ( ) casa de zaporta, saragossa ( ) caserta pal. , cassoni (marriage coffers) , , ( ) cathedral of beauvais, doors ; burgos (see burgos); como, east end ; windows ; cortona, ceil- ing ( ); cuenca, sacristy doors , ; florence (duomo) , , , , ( ); granada , , , , , ; jaen , index , , ( ); i-e mans, tomb in ; limoges, choir-screen ; nantes, tomb of francis ii of brittany ( ); rouen, tomb of cardinals of amboise ( ); salamanca ("new" cathedral) towers ; sienna , , , ( ); st. patrick (n. y.) ; st. paul's (london) ; toledo , ; tours, tomb of children of charles viii , ( ); val- ladolid caurree, isabeau (tap.) ceilings: caprarola , ( ); coved , ; doge's pal., early ren'ce , , ( - , , ); english - , , , , , ( - , , , , ); in farnese palace, rome, ; french , , , ( , ); german , ( ); middle ren'ce - , ( , , , , ); painted , , ( , ); pitti pal. ( ); sienna li- brary ; sistine chapel , ; spanish , , ( , ); vaulted - cellini, benvenuto (scp.) , , centennial exhibition, philadelphia , , ceramics: baroque italian ( ); dutch , , ( , ); early ren'ce italian - , ( , , , ); english - , ( - ); french - , ( , ); ger- man - , ( - ); middle ren'ce italian - , ( - ) certosa, granada certosa, pavia , , , , , , ( , ) chairs: early ; english - , ( - ); french , , , , ( , , ); german ( ) chfilons-sur-maroe, doorway chambers, sir william (archt.) , chambord, chateau , , , chapel: sistine (see sistine chapel); of st. lazare, marseilles ; of rue ; of tillieres , chapu (scp.) charles of anjou charles viii ; tomb of children of , ( ) charlottesville, va., university li- brary , chasuble, italian ( ) chateau of amboise ; ancy-ie- franc ; anet , , ( ); azay-le-rideau ; beaumesnil ; blois ; east wing , ; fireplaces , ( c); chambord , , , ; ch£verny, wainscot, bahut ( ); fecouen ; fontainebleau , , , ; gallery francis i , ( , ); gaillon , ; madrid , ; pagny, carved detail ( ) cmret (scp., dec.) , cheverny, wainscot, bahut ( ) chevalier, fttienne (cbm.) chicago: auditorium b'ld'g ; columbian exhibition , , ; schiller b'ld'g ( , ); transportation b'ld'g chihuahua (mex.), church facade , ( ) chimney pieces: colonial , ( ); english , , ( ); flem- ish ; french , ( c) chinoiseries and singeries , chippendale, thomas (cbm.) , , , , , ( ) chiswick, villa christ church, philadelphia, spire ( ) christopher wren, sir (archt.) , , , , ( , ) church steeples: colonial , ( ); english ( ) churriguera, jose and sons (archts.) , , , index churrigueresque church facades , , - , , ( , , . , ) churrigueresque stvle , , , , , cinquecento , , cirque d'fite, paris city hall, new york civil war period in u. s. , civitale, matteo (scp.) classic detail in renaissance classic origins of renaissance orna- ment - classic reaction classic revival , - claude perrault (archt.) clerissy (cer.) clermont-ferrand, doorway ( ) clifford'c inn, london, carvings ( ) clocks, american ( ) coblenz, gymnasium, carving ( ) cockerell (archt.) coffer or marriage chest , , ( ) cogolludo, medinaceli pal. colbert , , , coleman, caryl (dec.) collegio de los irlandeses, sala- manca, cologne: cathedral completed ; rathaus ; tapestry in st. gereon's colombe, michel (scp.) colonia, francisco (archt.) , colonial ornament in u. s. - ; colonial architectural - , ( - ); beginnings, early char- acter ; doorways , ( , , , ); exterior details - ; furniture - , ( , ); in- terior decoration ; minor arts - ; silverware ; textiles ; woodwork - , ( - , - ) colonnades: louvre ; of st. peter's colonne de juillet, paris colossal orders , . jf , , ( ) colosseum, rome, cornice imitated columbia university library, new york columns, twisted , , , , , ( , , ) commercial furniture adv. ( ) como, cathedral east end ; windows como, tommaso of (scp.) composite capitals concluding observations , conditions after - ; ar- chaeological discoveries - ; industrial and political revolution , ; influence on decorative arts ; arts-and-crafts ; commerce and travel , , congelations , ( ) consiglio, pal. del, verona consoles, baroque , ( , ) corbels , , ( , , ) corinthian capitals corinthianesque capitals , , , come jo, pedro (archt.) cornices, wooden, in spain , ( ) cortona, cathedral ceiling ( ) corufia, san jorge , ( ) covarrubias (archt.) , , coved ceilings , cowles mansion, farmington, gate ( ) cracow (krakau), jagellons chapel craigie (longfellow or vassall) house, cambridge, mass. ( ) cram, r. a., (archt) cremona, stanga pal. portal , cressent, charles (cbm.) crewe hall ; ceiling-pendant ( ) cristoforo lombardo (archt.) crown derby ware , ( ) cucci, domenico (cbm.) , index cuenca cathedral, racristy doors , curl-overs, curlicues , , , , , , ( , ) curtain: machine-net ( ); of madison sq. theatre d damian forment (archt.) dauphine, place, paris da vinci, lionardo (painter) , , declaration chamber, independence hall, phil'a ( ) decline of local styles - decorative painting under louis xv de bry, theodore (eng.) , ( ) de co'tte, robert (archt.) de la planche, francois (cer.; delft ceramists ; tiles and wares - , ( - ) delia porta, giacomo (archt.) , , delia quercia, giacomo (scp.) , , , , , ( , ) delia robbia, andrea (scp., cer.) , , , , ( ) delia robbia, girolamo (cer.) , delia robbia, luca (scp., cer.) , , , , , , ( ) delia robbia ware , , , ( a) delia robbias, the , , delia stella, paolo (archt.) delorme, philibert (archt.) delorme, pierre (scp.) desiderio da settignano (dec. scp.) , des vosges, place, paris de vogue. h tel, di.jon , ( ) de vriendt (floris) (archt.) de vries, vredcm.m, jan and paul (engs.) diego de riano (archt.) , diego de siloe (archt.) , , dinkelsbuhl, window , ( ) doge's palace, venice , , , , ( , , ) domenico cucci (cbm.) , domenico fancelli (scp.) domes: decoration ; of duomo, florence , ; of st. peter's, rome donatello (donato di betti bardi) (scp.) , , door-knocker from narbonne ( a) door-lock, bamberg museum ( ) door-panel: h tel cluny ( ); st. louis-en-l'isle, paris ( ) door-pull, henri ii period ( ) doors and doorways: biickeburg , ( ); chfilons-sur-marne ; clermont-ferrand ( ); dutch ( , ); french - ; ger- man , , ( , ); hat- field house ( ); leyden ( ); liverpool, st. george's hall ( ); mandorla doorway, florence , ( ); massimi pal., rome ( ); in spain , ( ); toledo, san clemente ( ); united states , , ( , , , , , ); vatican , ( ); wis- mar , ( ) doors and windows, early - , ( - , , ) doria palace, rome dormers: french , , ( , ); german , , ( ) dresden: chnir in museum ( ); zwinger pal. , ( ) duban, j. f. (archt.) , due, l. j. (archt.) , ducal palace, c rhino ; window ( ) duccio, agostino di (archt., scp.) , duccrceau, j. a. (archt.) , , , dugald stewart monument duncan phyfc (cbm.) , index floral design: french ( ); ger- man ( ) florence: annunziata church ; baptistery , , , ( ); gates of same , , , ( ); cathedral (duomo), dome of , ; east end of same ; mandorla door of same , ( ); cantorie in opera del duomo , ; foundling hospital (innocenti) , ; log- gia dei lanzi ; pal. bartolini , ; pal. larderel ; pal. pandolfini , ( ); pal. pitti , , , , , , ( ); pal quaratesi ( ); pal. riccardi , , , ( o); pal. rucellai , , ( ); pal. strozzi ; pal. vecchio , , ( , , ); pazii chapel , , , ( , ); san lorenzo , , , ( ); san spirito , , , ( ); santa croce, marsuppini tomb , , , ( , ); pulpit in, , , ( , ); villa petraia, fountain florentine pediment , , , , , ( ) floris (de vriendt) (archt.) folded linen panels , ( ) fontainebleau chateau , , , , , , ( , ) fonts for holy water , , ( , , ) foreign influences in england forment, damien (archt.) formentone (archt.) fortuny, mariano (painter) note fossombroni pal., arezzo, detail ( ) fouquet, jean (painter) fountains , , , , , ( , ); of innocents, paris, , ; of trevi, rome fra giocondo (archt.) fragonard (painter) francesco borromini (archt.) , , , , francis i: balustrade and capitals ; candelabrum-shafts , ( ); carving , ( , ); ceilings and interiors , ( ); details of style - , ( - ); doorway at toulouse ( ); dormers ( , ); facade system , ( ); features , ; fireplaces , ( c); furniture - , ( ); open stair , ( f) ; s-scrolls ( , g) ; style of, in general - ; tomb of, st. denis , ; wing at blois , ; woodwork , ( , ) francis ii of brittany, tomb , ( ) francisco colonia (archt.) , francois mansart (archt.) , frascati, villa falconieri , ( ) frazee (archt.) ( ) french: academy of painting and sculpture ; academy at rome ; brocade or velvet ( ); cam- paigns in italy ; ceramics , - ; ( ); doors and doorways , - , ( ); gothic revival ; influence in u. s. ; lace , ( a); needlework , ( ); neo- grec style - , ( - ) french renaissance: baroque ele- ments in ; character ; dec- orative sculpture ; furniture (see below); gallic and latin ele- ments , , , ; interior decoration - , , - , - , - , ( , , - , , , , , ); minor arts, henry ii-iii ; periods ; transition from gothic friedrichsbau, heidelberg fruit and foliage , , , ( , ) fuga, ferdinando (archt.) furniture: american - , - , - , ( , , c,d, ) ; empire - , ( , ); index english - , , ( , - , ); french - , , - , - , ( , , , , , - , , - ); german - , ( - ); ital- ian - , - , - , ( - , , - ); netherlands - , - , ( - , ); spanish - , ( - ) fiirstenhof, wismar ; doorway , ( ) gable ornament, leyden ( ) gables and dormers, german , , ( ) gabriel, j. a. (archt.) , gaillon, chateau , gatne (sheath-figure) , , , , , , , , ( , , , , , ) galeazzo alessi (archt.) , galerie d'apollon, louvre , , ( , ); des glaces, versailles , galilei (archt.) gallery of francis i, fontainebleau , ( , ) gallic and latin elements in french art , , , , , gardens: french , ; italian , , ( ) gamier, charles (archt.) , , , gaulli, g. b. (stucco-w.) gates, gateways , ( , ); (see doors, doorways) gazzini (scp.) genoa: pallavicini pal. , ( ); sta. annunziata, interior genre rocaille georgian architecture (see colo- nial) germain pilon (scp.) , german armor ; baroque style - ; carving and sculpture - ( - ); ceramics - , ( - ); gatnes , ( , , ); metal work and minor arts - , ( - , - ); portals , , ( , ); rococo german renaissance - ; doors and windows - (see german portals); early monuments ; facade decoration , , ( ); furniture , , ( , ); gables and dormers - , ( , ); interior decoration - ; orders, use of - ; painters (list) ; typographic ornament , ( * - ) germantown, pa., chimney-piece , ( ) germany: gothic revival - ; greek revival ; modern devel- opments in , , ( , ); renaissance invasion of geronimo da fiesole gesii, church of , ghent town-hall , ( ) ghiberti, lorenzo (scp.) , , , ; pupil of in spain giacetti (cbm.) giacomo barozzi da vignola (archt.) , , , , , , , , , giacomo della porta , , giacopo della quercia (scp.) , , , , , ( , ) giacopo tatti sansovino (archt.) , , , gian galeazzo, tomb of, pavia gibbons, grinling (carver) , gibbs, james (archt.) , , , , ( ) gil de hontafion, rodrigo (archt.) , ginain (archt.) giocondo, fra (archt.) giorgio vasari (archt., painter) giotto (di bondone, painter) , giovanni battista piranesi (eng.) giovanni da bologna (scp.) index hancock house, boston, mass., win- dow detail ( ) hans holbein the younger hansen, theophil (archt.) hardwicke hall harvard university, capitals .from law school ( ) hatfield house ; doorway ( ) hawksmoor (archt.) heidelberg castle , , ( ) heiligenburg castle, ceiling , ( ) hengest-gouffier, helene de (cer.) henri-deux ware , ( a, c) henry vii's chapel, westminster , hepplewhite (cbm.) , , , , , ( ) herrera, juan de (archt.) , hilario, maestro (iron-w.) hinart, louis (tap.) hirschvogels (cer.) hittorff, j. j. (archt.) holbein, hans the younger holv-water fonts , , ( , , ) homewood, baltimore, md., in- terior cornice ( ) hontaflon, rodrigo gil de (archt.) horta, victor (dec.) ; window by ( ) hospicio provincedl, madrid , note hospital, civic at jativa hospital, greenwich , hospital, great, at milan hospital real, santiago de com- postela ; santa cruz, toledo , , ; san juan bautista, toledo hdtel de ville, beauvais ; paris hotels: d'assezat toulouse ; biron, matignon ; champs eiysees, paris, detail ( ); d'fecoville, caen ; des inva- lides (and dome) ; lamoignon, paris ; de lasbordes, tou- louse ; de lauzun, paris, de- tail ( ); de la monnaie (mint), paris ; de salm (legion d'honneur), paris ; soubise , ( ); de vogue, dijon , ( ) houses of parliament: budapest ; london huesca cathedral, retablo hugues sambin (cbm.) , , , hunt, r. m. (archt.) , i ibarra, pedro (archt.) ifs, chateau des ilaria del caretto, tomb of at lucca , , , , ( , ) ii rosso , imperial institute,. s. kensington, london independence hall, phila. , ; declaration chamber , ( ) independent developments in u. s. infantada, guadalajara , , ( ) inigo jones (archt.) , , , inlays, marble and wood , , ( - ) innocenti, (foundling hospital) florence , innocents, fountain of the, paris , innovations in middle renaissance - intarsia , ( , ); painted imi- tation of interior decoration: french - , , - , ( , , , ); italian baroque - ( ); middle renaissance - ( , ) index leau (belgium), altar-rail , ( ) le brun, charles (painter) , , , , , , lefuel h. m. (archt.) , le mans cathedral, tomb in lemercier, jacques (archt.) le nfitre (landscape archt.) leopardo, alessandro (bronze-w.) lepautre, antoine and jean (eng.) , , , le primatice (painter) , le roux, roland (scp.) i^es andelys, church lescot, pierre (archt.) , , levau, louis (archt.) ley den: carved "jewels" ; dor- mer ; town-hall ; gable from same ( ) libraries: boston public, congres- sional library: of columbia university, n. y. ; congressional at wash- ington ; piceolomini of sienna cath. ; public, boston, mass. ; of ste. genevieve, paris ; of vatican, rome libreria san marco, venice liebfrauenkirche, wiirzburg lille potteries lima (peru), i-a merced church , , , ( ) limoges: cathedral, choir-screen ; enamels , , ( ) linenfold panels , ( ) lionardo bruno, tomb of, florence , ( ) lionardo da vinci (painter) , , liverpool, st. george's hall, ; doors of ( ) lodi, incoronata church loggia dei lanzi, florence ; of villa madama , ( , , ) logtrie of vatican, rome , , , , , ( , ) lombardi family (archts.) , ; martino, tullio ; pietro , lombardo, cristoforo (archt.) london: albert memorial , ( ); charterhouse ceiling ; clifford's inn, carvings ( ); houses of parliament ; man- sion house, royal exchange ; middle temple hall, ceiling ; south kensington museum ; st. martin's-in-the-fields, steeple ; st. mary's, carvings from ( ); st. mary-le-bow, steeple ( ) ; st paul's cathedral longfellow-craigie house, cam- bridge, mass ( ) longhena, baldassare (archt) longleat hall , lonja at saragossa , , ( ); at seville lorenzo bernini (archt.) , , , , lorenzo ghiberti (scp.) , , ; doors by ( ) lorenzo marina (archt.) , ( ) louis, age of the, in france louis xii, tomb of at st. denis, , ( ) louis xiii, style of , , ( - ) louis xiv: architectural design under , ; character of period of - ; furniture - , ( , ); garden art under ; interior decoration - , ( - ); metalwork , ( , ) louis xv period and style - : decorative painting in ; details , , , , ( - ); furniture - , ( ); iron- work , , ( ) louis xvi period and style - ; character of , ; fur- niture, etc. , ( - ); in- terior decoration , ; influ- ence of , , , ; metal- work , ( , ) index louvain, st. pierre, town-hall louvre palace, paris: colonnade of ; court ; court facade ; galerie d'apollon , ( , ); xjrande galerie , ; interior decoration ; "new" louvre ; panel from chamber of henry iv , ( ); tribune of caryatides luca della robbia (scp., cer.) , , , , , , ( ) lucca cathedral, tomb ilaria del caretto , , , , ( , ) luciano da laurana (scp.) i.uini (bernardo, bernardino) (painter) lunghi, martino (archt.) lupiana monastery, court m macerata, church machuca (archt.) madama palace, rome madama villa, rome , , , , ( , ) madeleine church, paris maderna, carlo (archt.) , , , madison sq. theatre, n. y. curtain madrid, chateau of , madrid, hospicio provincedl (asy- • lum) , note maestro bartolom£ (scp.) maestro hilario (iron-w.) maine, le, counts of as art-patrons maison carree, nlmes , maisons-lafitte maftre roux (painter) majano benedetto da (scp.) , , majano giovanni da (archt.) majano giuliano da (scp.) , majolica: origin ; border detail ( ) mandorla doorway, duomo of flor- ence , ( ) manoel vasquez (archt.) mans, le, tomb of charles of anjou mansart, francois (archt.) , mansart, jules hardouin , mansion house, london mantegna (painter) mantua, pal. del te , . , ; reggio gonzaga ; san andrea , manufacture des meubles de la couronne manuscript ornament , mappa mansion, trenton, n. j. , ( ) marble inlay ( ) marc de conrano (archt.) marina, lorenzo (archt.) marine exchange, philadelphia marini, giovanni (archt.) marly, chateau marot, daniel and jean (dec. and eng.) , marseilles, early ren'ce works at marsuppini tomb in santa croce , , , ( , ) martino lunghi (archt.) mascarons ( , ) massimi palace, rome , , ( ) mast-bases, venice matteo civitale (scp.) mayence cathedral, stalls, carving ( ) mccomb and mangin (archts.) mckim, c. f. (archt.) mckim, mead & white, mechlin lace , medici monuments, san lorenzo, florence medici villa, rome medinaceli pal., cogolludo, doorway medinaceli pal., jativa meissonier (dec.) index mendoza pal., lacalahorra merchants' exchange, n. y. metalwork: american , , , ( , ); english , , ( - ) i french , , - , , , , ( , , , , ); german - , ( - , - ); italian , - , - , ( , - ); spanish , , ( , - ) metropolitan museum, n. y. ; altarpiece in ; armor , ( ) meunier (scp.) mexico: cathedral ; confessional in same ( ); sagrario of same , ; chihuahua, church facade , ( ); guadalupe, el posito , ( ) michelangelo , , , , , , ; frescoes in sistine chapel by him , , , ; grotesques attributed to him ( ) michel colombo (scp.) michele carlone (archt.) michelozzi, michele (archt) , , , middle renaissance - ; char- acter of - ; ceilings - ; ceramics, etc. - ; interior decoration - ; metalwork - ; painting - ; textiles - ; use of orders - ; villas and gardens - ; wood- work and furniture - middle temple hall mid-victorian period migliorini, the (cbms.) "miguel de figueroa (archt.) milan: archepiscopal seminary , , ( ); great hospital ; marina pal. ; san satiro ; sta. maria delle grazie , , , miletus, apollo temple imitated mills, robert (archt.) mino da fiesole (scp.) , , minor architecture and arts (see under separate countries) mint, munich ; paris (hdtel de la monnaie) ; philadelphia miracoli church, brescia , , , , ( ) miracoli church, venice, , , ( ) mirror-frame, florentine ( ) mirrors, middle renaissance , ( ) modern german cabinet ( ) ; wine flagon ( ) modern revivals (see revivals) moderne kunst modillions moldings in middle renaissance , ( , ) monreale cathedral, twisted columns montefeltro escutcheon ( ) monuments: dugald stewart, rob- ert burns ; medici ; reg- nault moore, professor charles, remarks on treatment of nature in renais- sance note moorish influence in spanish art , , , , , moorish lily , ( ) morden college, blackheath, en- trance ( ) moreto, giovanni (archt.) morris house, n. y. ; details ( ) morris, william , mortlake tapestries morto da feltro (stucco-w.) motives in early renaissance orna- ment teq. moustiers pottery miiller, wilhelm (archt.) mttnden, rathaus, portal columns ( ) mufiez, sandro (archt.) munich: miinzengebaude (mint) ; st. michael's church municipio, milan, gatne miinzengebaude, munich murcia cathedral facade index murguia (archt.) music balconies (cantorie) , , ( ) n nantes cathedral, tomb of francis ii of brittany , ( ) naples: arch of alfonso of ara- gon ; carmine church ; porta capuana ; san francesco di paola ; tombs napoleon (bonaparte),influence narbonne, door-knocker from ( a) nature-movement, the - ; in u. s. nature in renaissance orn't navaho blankets , ( ) needlework, early , ( ) neo-classic or neo-renaissance movement in u. s. , n£o-grec style in france - , ( - )" netherlands - ; architecture - , - ; ceramics - , ( , ) ; furniture - , - , ( - , , - ); laces , , ( ); tapestries - nevers potteries new museum, oxford , newport, r. i., door of house ( ) new sacristy, san lorenzo, flor- ence, monuments in new york: city hall ; columbia university library ; jumel or morris house , ( ); mer- chants' exchange (nat'l city bank) ; metropolitan museum of art , , , ; metro- politan tower; municipal b'ld'g ; old academy of design , , , ( ); old court house, detail ; st. patrick's cathedral ; st. paul's , ( ); trin- ity church ; west st. and woolworth b'ld'gs niccol pisano (scp.) , , niccolo salvi (archt.) niches in early ren'ce , ( ) niculoso da pisa (cer.) , nielles, flemish ( ); french ( ) nimes, maison carree imitated , nineteenth century: conditions in - ; in united states - nonesuch palace nuns (piano-maker) , ( ) nuremberg: carving and leadwork from ( ); fanlight from ( ) o "octagon" house (tayloe h.), washington oiron ware , ( , ) old academy of design, new york , , ( ) old court-house, new york, detail ( ) omodeo (amadeo) (archt.) , opera house, paris , , , ( ) oppenord, oppendordt (dec.) , orcagna, andrea (archt., scp.) orders of architecture: in early renaissance - ; in middle ren'ce - , , ( , ); in france - , , , , , ( ); in spain orders, colossal , , ( , ) ordonez, bartolome (scp.) oriental influences , , , , , , , , , , oriental motives ( , , ) or san michele, florence, altar imi- tated ospedale del ceppo, pistoia; frieze otto-heinrichsbau, heidelberg , , ( ) otto wagner (archt.) index ; st. vincent de paule ; street architecture , details ( ) parliament houses: budapest ; london patent office, washington pavia: battle of, influence , ; certosa , , , , , ( ); group of artists pazzi chapel, florence , , , , , ( , , ) peasant art and ornament , - , ( - ) pediments, florentine , , , , ( ) pedro gumiel (archt.) pedro ibarra (archt.) pedro ribera (archt.) penaranda (di duero) pal: ceiling ; court penicaud (enameler) ; plate by him ( ) penni, bartolomeo (painter) percier and fontaine (archts.) perino del vaga (painter) perrault, claude (archt.) perreal, jean (scp.) perseus and medusa, statue , ( ) persistence of flamboyant gothic in france , personal factor in renaissance , perugia: confraternita di san ber- nardino ; sala del cambio , , ( ); san pietro casinese, stalls , ( ) perugino (pietro vanucci) (paint- er) peruzzi, baldassare (archt.) , , , , philadelphia, pa.: bartram house ; centennial exhibition , ; christ church spire ( ); fairmount waterworks ; gi- rard college ; independence hall , , ( ); marine exchange ; mint philibert delorme (de l'orme) (archt.)* , phillipse manor, yonkers, n. y. ( ) phyfe, duncan (cbm.) , pia, villa at rome piastenschloss, brieg , piccolomini library, sienna ( ) piedra, monastery facade piero di medici, tomb of, florence , , ( ) pierre bontemps (scp.) , pierre delorme (scp.) pierre lescot (archt.) , pietro lombardi (archt.) , pilasters, decoration of , , , ( , , , , , , , ) pilasters as wall-decoration pilon, germain (scp.) , pinturricchio (painter) piranesi, giovanni battista (eng.) , pisa cathedral doors pisano, niceolb (scp.) , , pistoia: ospedale del ceppo ; pal. del comune , ( ) pitti palace, florence , , , , , , ( ) pius ii, tomb of in st. peter's, rome places dauphine and des vosges, paris ; de la concorde planche, francois de la (cer.) planche (cer.) plassenburg, schloss plasterwork in great britain , (see also ceilings) plate resque style , ; in america , ; architects . of (list) ; architectural ornament of ; rustication poirel (cer.) i'olish peasant ornament ( - ) polychromy in paris , pompei palace, verona pope julius iii, villa of, home, , ( ) poppelmann, m. d. (archt.) index ; casa de pilatos, portal ; cathedral capilla mayor, reja ; house of dukes of alva, ceiling ; lonja ; provincial hospital ; ( ); san luis, twisted columns ; san salva- dor, altar, etc. ; university chapel, tombs in , , ; upper part of reja ( ) sevres pottery sgraffito - , ( b, ) shafts of pilasters and columns, early , ( - ) (see pilasters) sheraton (cbm.) , , , , , ( j* shrine for heart of francis i , ( ); for heart of henry ii , shrines, fonts, etc. , ( ) sideboard and cabinet, german (austria) ( ) sienna: baptismal font in san gio- vanni , , ( ); cathedral pavement , ( ); pulpit , ; stalls ; library ceiling , ( ); doorway of same , ( ); palazzo pubblico , , ( , , ); la scala hospital balustrade ( ); sta. caterina siennese torch-holders , ( ) silleria (choir-stalls) , , , ( ) siloe, diego de (archt.) , silverwork, english , ( , ) sistine chapel, rome: frescoes , ; music balcony ; swag on same , , ( ) "sky-scrapers" sladtz brothers (cbms.) solari (lombardi) (archts.) solesmes abbey, transept decora- tions south kensington: art schools ; imperial institute ; natural history museum spacla palace, home, stuccoes , ( ) spain: beginnings of renaissance in - ; becomes first power of the world ; italian artists in , , ; mixture of styles in ; moorish influence in , , , spanish renaissance: baroque influ- ence in ; beginnings of - ; churrigueresque style , - , , , - , , ( , , , , ); courtyards (patios) , ; doorways , ( , ); griego-romano style , ; metalwork , ( , - ); plateresque style and orna- ment , - , ( , ); rejas , , ( , ); rustica- tion ; sillerfas , ( ); stamped leather , ; succes- sion of styles ; textiles , , ( - ); tiles - , ( ) spello, column from , ( ) spread of renaissance st., ste. = saint, sainte ste. clothilde, paris st. denis, tombs in , , , ( ) st. eustache, paris st. gatien (cathedral) troyes, tomb in ste. genevieve, paris, library st. george's hall, liverpool st. lazare chapel, marseilles st. maclou, rouen, doors st. mary-le-bow, london, steeple ( ) st. mary's, oxford, portal prototype st. mary's woolnoth, london, ceil- ing ( ) st. michael's, munich st. patrick's cathedral, new york st. paul's cathedral, london, carv- ings st. paul's, new york , ( ) index st peter's, rome: baldaechino , , , ( ); colonnades ; dome ; doors ; holy-water font ; tomb pius ii ; vault st. snlpice, paris, facade st. vincent de paule, paris st. wilfrid's, york staffordshire potteries stained glass, italian - , ( ) stairs: colonial , , ( );. english , , , ( ); to pulpit. sienna cathedral stairways: blois . , ( ); chambord ; english ; span- ish , stamped leather, spanish s, stanford white (archt., dec.) state houses: annapolis, md. ; boston, mass. ; hartford, conn. ; ltichmond, va. , steindl (archt.) stewart, dugald, monument sticffcl (metal-w.) stiegel (glass-w.) st rap work (applique) english , , , ( , , ); german , , ( . ) strasbourg pottery strickland (archt.') strozxi palace, florence stucco: in baroque period , , ( , , ); in middle ren'cc - , ( , ) study of nature in renaissance ; in modern art - , sub-treasury, new york sullivan, louis h. (archt.) , , sutton place, guildford, terra-cottas swag or festoon , , , , ( , , , ) t tables: early italian ; flemish , ( ) ;' french , , , , ( , ); middle renais- sance and baroque , ( , ); spanish , ( ) talenti, francesco (archt.) tapestries: arras , ; bayeux ; flemish - ; french" , - ; in germany ; in great britain, mortlake , ; italian , , ( ); in vati- can ; in sistine chapel tarragona, poblet monastery, re- tablo tavera, tomb of cardinal, toledo tayloe ("octagon") house, wash- ington tcrra-cotta head of caesar, hamp- ton court ( ) textiles: colonial (u. s.) ; eng- lish , ; french , , - ; italian, early - , ( -s ); middle ren'ce - , ( , ); later ren'ce - . ( - ); oriental motives and influences , , ( ); spanish . ( - ) theodore de bry (eng.) thomas jefferson (statesman, archt.) tiffanv, louis c. (dec.) , , ,' files: dutch ( , ); spanish , ( , ) tillieres, chapel , tintoretto (giacopo robusti) (painter) , titian (tizinno vecelli) (painter) , tivoli, villa d'este , toft (cer.) , , ( ) toledo: cathedral, doorway ; transparent*" in same ; san clemente doorway , ( ); santa cruz hospital court ; ceiling ; stair-wall s ; tavera tombs tombs: early types - , ( , , , ); bruni in sta. crocc, index v val del vira (archt.) valencia: san andrea portal , ( ); santa catalina, tower valenciennes lace valentino di lira (archt.) valladolid: cathedral ; la pasion ; university facade valmarano palace, vicenza van brugh (archt.) van loo (painter) van orley, bernhard (tap.) vanvitelli (archt.) varguenos, spanish varin (eng.) vasari, giorgio (archt., painter) vases: medicis at versailles ; from menard-le-chateau , ( ) vasquez, manoel (archt.) , vassall-craigie house, cambridge, mass. ( ) vatican: borgia apartments ; camera della segnatura , , ; coved ceilings ; hall of maps ; loggie , ; stuc- coes , ( ); doors , ( ); sala rcgia , ( ); sistine chapel , , , , ; tapestries , ( ) venetia, renaissance enters - venetian knocker, th-century ( ) venetian lace , ( ) venetian printers, early venice: academy ceiling ; casa dario ; chimney-piece ornament ( ); doge's palace , , ( , ), ceilings , giants' stairs , panel from ( ); fondaco dei turchi ; frari church, tombs in ; i.ibreria (library of san marco) ; pal. vendramini , , ( ); san giobbe ; san giorgio degli schiavoni ; san zacoaria , , , , ( ); santa maria dei miracoli , , , , , , ( , , , ); santa maria del orto ; santa maria della salute , ( ); santi giovanni e paolo, tombs in ; scuola di san marco , ; scuola di san rocco ; zecca (mint) vercelli, san andrea, twisted col- umns in sacristy ( ) verdure tapestries vermeyren (tap.) vermiculations and congelations , ( ) vernis martin verneuil, corbel from , ( ) verona: palazzo del consiglio ; palazzo pompef , ( a) veronese, paolo cagliari (painter) , verrocchio, andrea (di cione) (scp.) , versailles palace - ; ceiling- cove ( ); galerie des glaces , ; interior ; keystone ( ) ; the trianons , , , ; vase medicis versatility of renaissance artists vicenza: basilica arcade , , ( ); palazzo valmarano ; villa capra victorian gothic , , vienna: belvedere pal. ; royal library ; schwarzenberg pal. ; votivkirche vigarnl, felipe , vignola, giacomo barozzi da (archt.) , , , , , , , , , villa: albani, rome , , ( ); capra at vicenza : caprarola, arcade , balus- ters , ceiling ( ); pilas- ter , ( ); d'este, tivoli , ; falconieri, frascati ( ); i^inte near viterbo , , ; madama, rome , , stuccoes , , index ( , ); medici, rome ; pia, rome villas, baroque villas and gardens, etc. , vinas j. b. (archt.) vinci, lionardo da (painter) , , viollet-le-duc, eugene emanuel (archt.) virginia state capitol, richmond , visconti, l. t. g. (archt.) viterbo, villa lante near (at bag- naia) , , vitruvius in spanish renaissance vittoria, alessandro (archt.) vogue, hdtel de at dijon , ( ) voluted buttresses: cathedral of syracuse ( ); santa maria della salute, venice ( ) von klenze (archt.) votivkirche, vienna vredeman de vries, jan and paul (engs.) w wagner, otto (archt.) wainscot: english ; french , , , ( , ) waldstein palace, prague walter, thomas u. (archt.) ward, w. h., quoted , - washington, d. c: capitol ; congressional library ; "octa- gon" or tayloe house ; patent office washington column, baltimore, md. water gate, london waterhouse, sir alfred (archt.) watteau (painter) , , wedgwood, josiah (cer.) , , ( ) west street building, new york, westminster abbey, henry vii's chapel , white, stanford (archt., dec.) whitehall palace, banqueting hall wight, peter b. (archt.) , , wilhelm mttller (archt.) wilhelm pannemaker (tap.) william morris , wilton house window, dinkelsbuehl , ( ) windows: english ; early renaissance italian , , ( , ); french , ( ); middle renaissance italian , ( ); in united states (colonial) , , , ( ) w'ismar, fiirstenhof , , ( ) withers, frederick c. (archt.) woolworth building, new york wooden cornices in spain , ( ) woodwork: colonial , , ( - , - ); early renaissance italian - , ( , ); english - , , ( , , ); french - , , ( , ); middle renaissance italian - , ( , ) wren, sir christopher (archt.) , , , , , ( ) wright, frank lloyd (archt.) wurzburg, liebfrauenkirche, win- dows y yellin, samuel (iron-w.) yonkers, n. y., phillip.se manor, chimney-piece ( ) york, st" wilfrid's , zecca (mint), venice zwinger palace, dresden , ( ) ^ nk hamlin, alfred d. . a history of ,h ornanent. vol. a manual of historic ornament, treating upon the evolution, tradition, and development of architecture & the applied arts ' -"- i m / .. -v /// ii -s" .-u m. • * ** historic ornament. monument to conte ugino, by mino da fiesole, church of the badia, florence. printed by s. clarke , granby kw, manchester ontents. page ornament of oceania ... egyptian ornament.... assyrian ornament greek architecture .... greek ornament . . . . roman architecture. . . . . . roman ornament . . . . . . pompeian ornament ..... byzantine ornament . . . . . romanesque architecture and ornament . . . celtic ornament . . . . . - scandinavian ornament ..... norman and gothic architecture . . . . norman ornament ...... early gothic ...... decorated or geometric gothic .... perpendicular gothic . . . . . french gothic . . . . . - renascence architecture and ornament . . . french renascence ...... english renascence ...... mahometan ornament ..... persian ornament . . . . . . indian ornament ...... chinese ornament ...... japanese ornament ...... the applied arts. mosaics ....... greek ceramics ...... ceramics ....... maiolica . . . . . . . terra cotta . . . . . . . glass . . . . . . . n stained glass . . . . . . enamels . . . . . . . gold and silver . . . . . . wrought iron . . . . . . . bronzes . . . . . . . decorative furniture . . . . . wood carving . . . . . ivories . . . . . . bookbindings . . . . . textile fabrics . . . . . . terms used in ornamental art . . . . printed initial letters . . . . . frets . . . . . . . the architectural capital . . . . . list of plates. plate page plate page i ornament of oceania . indian ornament egyptian ornament chinese ornament assyrian ornament japanese ornament greek architecture roman scroll .... ° i >- greek ornament , is roman architecture the applied arts. ^ v roman ornament , mosaics ..... / greek ceramics .... pompeian ornament . ceramics ..... ii byzantine ornament . ° maiolica ..... y romanesque ornament glass no celtic ornament . stained glass .... scandinavian ornament .o \ the triforium and clearstory ' '} gold and silver . . . , / norman details .... early gothic details . wrought iron .... decorated gothic details . bronzes . . . . , perpendicular details . ° furniture ..... i o french gothic .... wood carving .... ) \ renascence ornament , ivories ..... bookbindings .... ~ > french renascence , | } .j [-textile fabrics . , , , a [-english renascence . . , , j j frets i c mahometan ornament plans of historic buildings . [ persian ornament , illuminated manuscript 'illustrations in the text. pagk page arabesque ornament .... palaces — the farnesc, rome arch of septimus severus . the vendramini, venice capitals ..... - - - - the verzi, verona caryatide from the erectheum casa del diavolo celtic ornament .... ancien hotel d'kcoville chairs ...... - parthenon — the elevation . h chinese pagoda .... peruvian potterv .... chalice ...... peruvian textiles .... console table . . . ... i tt persian plate corinthian order from the pantheon . plan of roman house coffered ceiling .... plan of lincoln cathedral . crockets polynesian ornament decorated gothic .... poppy-heads ..... doric frieze from the parthenon relief from nike apteros . early gothic window roman scroll ..... s engraved panel by aldegrever . roman house — plan. enamels ...... sibyl, by michel angelo . frieze from the parthenon . sicilian fabric ..... frieze from susa .... singing gallery, by donatello . - frieze from tivoli .... spitalfields silk .... ' frieze by mantegna .... s. george, by donatello . frieze from phigaleia stained glass — gothic borders ..... early jesse window . " gothic piers ..... early grisaille .... gothic doorway, amiens . quarries ..... » golden candlestick .... canopies ..... us greek coins ..... terra cotta — greek .... - ilaria di carretto .... lucca della robbia ionic order from ilyssus ii andrea della robbia . japanese key pattern i theatre of marcellus .... lancet window .... tomb of lorenzo de medici i lismore crosier .... tomb of ilaria di carretto . metopes of the parthenon . i cl monument of lysicrates ii woodcut from the grotesque alphabet jj palace — the strozzi, florence . of ..... part i. the history and development of architecture & ornament. rnament of oceania. the ornamentation of the people of the pacific isles is full of interest, and is remarkable for the evolution and perfecting of an ornamental style by a primitive people, with myths and traditions purely local, and in no way influenced by other nations. it is a style of ornament full of meaning and symbolism, yet simple in detail and arrangement, not founded upon the beautiful vegetation and flora of their islands, but upon abstract forms derived from the human figure, and arranged with a pleasing geometrical precision remarkable for a primitive people. the ornamental art of these people may be broadly divided into provinces, each with its distinct ornamental characteristics and tradi- tions,. new zealand showing the highest development and australia the lowest in the ornament of polynesia and melanesia. much of the ornament is purely linear, consisting of parallel and zig-zag lines; that of australia consists almost entirely of these lines incised in the ground and occasionally filled in with colour. in new guinea a higher development is reached, the ornament, of straight and curved lines, being carved in flat relief. in the pro- vince of tonga-samoa, the surface is divided into small fields, and the linear ornament runs in a different direction on each of the fields. the hervey and austral islands are distinguished by their remarkable adaptations of the human female figure, the illustrations given here showing the original type and its ornamental development. these ex- amples, together with the circular form the elements of 'omiaaictit i from a club. samoa. eye pattern, the hervey province, of which the heape collection contains many fine examples. in the solomon island the linear ornament is occasionally interspersed with an inlay of angular pieces of mother of pearl. the new zealand province is distinguished by its skilful pierced carving, the beauty of its spiral forms adapted from the human figure (figs. - ), and the con- stant use of the border here given. egyptian ornament. plate . hathokic capital mourttcd by a ma - philf w nged globe apid a p thc carabceu o(v acr£ beetle coluam thebes c the ecyptiah lotus om~ aj-vemt idoc b c gyptian ornament. the history of egypt, extending from b.c. to b.c., during which thirty dynasties existed, is usually divided into three groups: ( ) the ancient empire, i.-xi. dynasties, - b.c.; ( ) the middle empire, xii.-xix., - b.c.; and ( ) the new empire, xx.-xxx. dynasties, - b.c. the capitals of the ancient empire comprised memphis and abydos; of the middle empire, thebes, luxor, and tanis; and of the new empire, sais and bubastes. the remarkable civilization of these early dynasties is attested by the many fine remains of architecture, sculpture, and decorative arts that enrich our national museums. the great pyramids were built during the th dynasty, the largest by kheops, - b.c., is ft. by ft, and ft. high; the second, by kephren, - b.c., is ft. by ft. and ft. high; and the third, ft.by ft., and ft. high, was erected by mykerinos, - b.c. the sphinx, half animal and half human, is the oldest sculpture known, and is probably of the st and nd dynasties, yet it is singular that all the earliest sculptures of the rd and th dynasties with which we are acquainted were realistic portraiture, remark- able for fidelity to nature. kings, queens, and individuals of note were finely sculptured, frequently of a colossal size. but the deities, amen sckhet, horus, hathor, iris, and osiris were represented in the later dynasties by small votive statuettes, noticeable for their number rather than for their artistic qualities, never reaching the excellence or vitality of the earlier period. much of the architectural enrichment was in cavo relievo, a peculiarly egyptian mode of ornamentation, the outline of the figures, birds, or flowers being sunk into the surface of the granite or basalt, and then carved within this sunk outline, leaving the ground or bed raised, these reliefs being invariably painted red, blue, green, and yellow. the frieze which in the hands of the greeks, at a later period, became their principal ornamental field, was used by the egyptians in superposed bands, showing, in cavo relievo, the industrial arts and pursuits—weaving, glass blowing, and the making of pottery; ploughing, sowing, and reaping; also hunting and fishing. the composition and sculpture of these incidents was simple, refined, and purely decorative, with a naivete and unaffectedness so appropriate to the architectonic condi- tions. mingled with these incidents were the beautiful hieroglyphs, or picture writing of the egyptians. figs. - are examples of painted decorations showing the spiral construction of lines, together with the symbolic treatment of the lotus, the latter being regarded by the egyptians as a symbol of fertility and of a new life, hence the profusion with which it was used in their decorative work. great fertility of invention was displayed in enriching their architectural capitals with the lotus, the papyrus, and the palm. a singular feature introduced during the th dynasty was the hathor capital, surmounted by a small naos. during the ptolemaic period— b.c. —the hathor capital was placed upon the vertical bell- shaped capital (fig. ). assyrian ornament. plate . assyrian ornament. the early history of babylonia and assyria is one long series of wars and conquests. originally one nation, they became divided, and the younger assyria in the north became the most powerful empire of that period, under tiglath-pileser i., b.c. oo, ashur-nasir-pal, b.c. - , shalmaneser ii., b.c. - , tiglath- pileser iii., b.c. - , the great sargon, b.c. - , senna- cherib, b.c. - , esarhaddon, b.c. - , and ashur-ban-pal, b.c. - . in b.c. the capital, nineveh, was destroyed by cyaxares the mede, and babylon arose again to power under nebuchadnezzar, b.c. - : this city was destroyed by cyrus the persian, b.c. . assyrian art, with its racial influences, religious beliefs, and climatic conditions, differs in a remarkable degree from egyptian art. though stone is found in assyria, the great cities were built of brick, no doubt owing to the fact of the arts and civilization coming from chaldea, where stone was scarce and clay plentiful. both at babylon in chaldea and nineveh in assyria the traditional type of building was rectangular, with arched openings and vaults, built of sun-dried bricks. the lower part of the wall was covered with large alabaster slabs, carved in low relief with scenes representing the king and his warriors engaged in hunting or fighting (fig. ). the upper part of the wall was in enamelled brick, or in coloured stucco, with details of the lotus and the bud, together with the rosette, which was often carried round the archivolt. the representa- tion of the industrial arts and the pursuits of agriculture, which is so admirably illustrated upon the egyptian reliefs, is entirely absent in assyria. the enamelled bricks of chaldea were modelled in low relief, with enamels of turquoise blue, yellow, white, and black, of fine quality and colour—one splendid example is the frieze of archers from the palace of susa. the enamelled bricks of assyria were usually flat, or modelled but slightly, and the enamels were less pure. the external walls were similar to the internal ones, but with larger friezes and bolder reliefs, and usually with religious subjects (fig. ). the portals were enriched with colossal winged and human-headed bulls, of alabaster, finely carved in relief. typical examples of assyrian ornament are the lotus and the bud (figs. and ), the patera or rosette (figs. and ), and the hom, or tree of life (fig. ). the lotus enrichment shows egyptian influence, and only came into use during the th century b.c., when intercourse between the two nations was established. it is differentiated from the egyptian lotus by its vigorous growth and curved profile, and the geometrical form of the calyx of the flower and bud (fig. ). the anthemion or hom, with its alternate bud and fir-cone, and with strong lateral markings, is beautiful in line and proportion of mass (fig. ). the horn is frequently used as a flower on the sacred tree, a form of enrichment that influenced much of the later persian and sicilian textile fabrics. greek architecture. plate - height or columm , u. or. ao modules. reek architecture. classic or columnar architecture is divided into the greek and roman styles, and each style comprises several orders of architecture: the grecian orders are the doric, the ionic, and the corinthian, and many examples of each of these orders are still extant in greece and her colonies—asia minor, southern italy, and sicily. from a comparison of these buildings, certain constructive and decorative features are observed to be present, and thence they are considered as the characteristics of the style or order, which comprises the base (except in the grecian doric, which has no base), column and capital, and the entablature, which consists of the" architrave, frieze, and cornice. the proportions of these orders are generally determined by the lower diameter of the column, which is divided into modules or parts, the height of the column always including the base and capital. the doric order was used for the early greek temples from b.c. , and cul- minated in the parthenon, b.c. . the columns in this order are ^ to diameters in height, with o shallow flutings with intermediate sharp arrises; the capital is half a diameter in height, and is composed of an echinus or ovolo moulding with annulets or deep channellings below, and a large square abacus above. the architrave is plain; the frieze is enriched by rectangular blocks, with vertical channellings in the face, termed triglyths, alternately with square metopes which were fre- quently sculptured. the cornice, composed of simple mouldings, projects considerably beyond the face of the frieze. the ionic order has columns of from to g% diameters in height, with flutings divided by narrow fillets; the base is half a diameter in height, and composed of a plinth, torus, fillet, cavetto, fillet, torus, and fillet. the capital is tv of a diameter high, and consists of a pair of double scrolls or volutes, supported by an echinus moulding enriched with the egg and tongue, with an astragal below. the entablature is one quarter the height of the columns, the architrave of one or more fascias, the frieze continuous and frequently enriched with sculpture in low relief; the cornice has simple and compound mouldings supported by a dentil band. caryatides were occasionally introduced into this order; they were female figures clad in drapery having vertical folds which re-echoed the flutings of the ionic column. these caryatides supported the entablature in place of the columns; a beautiful example is in the south portico of the erechtheum at athens. caryatide, erechtheum. the corinthian order was not much used by the greeks; the examples, however, show considerable refinement and delicacy of details. the columns are diameters in height, with flutings; the base is half a diameter high; the capital is a little greater than a diameter in height, and is enriched with acanthus foliations and spiral volutes. the entablature is richer and the cornice deeper and more elaborate than those of the other orders. the principal doric buildings in greece are:—the temples at corinth ' , b.c. , yegina ' , b.c. , the parthenon ' , and the theseum ' , b.c. ; the temples of jupiter at olympia ' , b.c. , apollo epicurius at bassse - , b.c. , propyla^a at athens, b.c. , and the minerva at sunium, b.c. . ionic buildings are:— temples at ilyssus ' , b.c. , nike apteros ' , b.c. , and the erechtheum, b.c. (see plan, plate ), north portico , east portico , at athens. in asia minor there are the temples of samos , priene , teos , diana at ephesus (with of its columns sculptured), and of apollo at miletos. corinthian buildings are:— the monument of lysicrates, b.c. , the tower of the winds (octagonal in plan), and jupiter olympius ' , b.c. . during the th century b.c. the doric order was extensively used in the greek colonies at sicily. at agrigentum there are the remains of six fine doric temples, of which the temple of zeus , b.c. , is the largest, being by ft. in this temple were found the telemones, or atlantes, male figures, ft. in height, with their arms raised, probably supporting the roof. this temple is also remarkable for its portico of seven columns, ft. in height, and having the peristyle walled up. at selinus there are five large doric temples - , and one ' with columns ft. in height, with an entablature of ft. at segesta there is a doric temple ' with only the peristyle complete and the columns unfluted, and at paestum, in southern italy, there are two doric temples ' and a basilica with its porticos of nine columns each. all these buildings in sicily and prestum date between and b.c. classification of classic temples. arrangement of columns and walls. apteral - - when the side walls have no colonnade. peripteral - - when there is a colonnade standing apart from the side walls. pseudo-peripteral when the colonnade is attached to the side walls. * dipteral - - when there is a double colonnade standing out from the walls. pseudo-dipteral - when the inner row of columns are attached to the side walls. the relation of the ends of the temple. /;; antis - - when the columns do not project beyond the ends of the side walls. prostyle - - when a portico stands in front of the temple. amphi-prostyle - when there is a portico at each end. mono-prostyle - if the portico is one column in depth. di-prostyle - if the portico is two columns in depth. the number of columns in the portico. tetrastyle - - if of four columns. hexastyle - - if of six columns. octastyle - - if of eight columns. monument of dt icjjate . athen .bc. . proportions of the entablature, in parts. archi- trave. frieze. cor- nice. total enta- blature.] a °/ "\ theseus ° ^ ' ionic - i erechtheum "\priene- i% ^ % ^ / ly.sicrates - ccrin-i hian-i fupiter * ° i °h ^ olympius '« m ionic order, temple of ilyssus. i i greek ornament. plate , arithemion orjiai*m tombs athens bc. go ok.mai^cmt ffvon the monumemt of lysicfvatcs athem .c. o. the east of the parthcnom - - poktion or the doorway. eighth eun. athen .c -o fum era l stele,with the reek ornament. greece, or hellas, consisted of a number of small states, speaking the same language, and worshipping the same gods. almost the whole of the aegean coast of asia minor was occupied in early times by greek colonies, which supplanted those of the phoenicians of tyre and sidon. the southern portion of this seaboard was occupied by the dorians, and the northern by ionians. in the course of time other greek settlements were made on the black sea and medi- terranean coast of asia minor, as well as at syracuse, gela and agrigentum in sicily, and in etruria and magna grecia in italy. these colonies appear to have reached a higher state of art at an early period than greece itself. the ascendency in art in greece was en- joyed by the dorians circa, b.c.; after which sparta took the lead, but was in turn excelled by the ionians, when athens became the focus of greek art, and attained a degree of perfection in that respect that has remained unequalled to this day. athens was des- troyed by the persians under xerxes, b.c.; but under pericles ( - b.c.) greek art reached its culmination. the abundant, although fragmentary, remains of grecian architec- ture, sculpture, and the industrial arts, show most vividly the artistic feeling and culture of the early greeks, with their great personality and religious sentiment, in which the personal interest of the gods and goddesses was brought into relation with the life and customs of the people. their myths and traditions, their worship of legendary heroes, the perfection of their physical nature, and their intense love of the beautiful, were characteristic of the greek people, from the siege of troy to their subjection by rome, b.c. . the almost inexhaustible store of greek art, now gathered in the british museum, and in other european museums, furnishes one of the most valuable illustrations of the many glorious traditions of the past. the vitality of con- ception, the dignity and noble grace of the gods, the consummate knowledge of the human figure, and the exquisite skill ofcraftmanship, are here seen in the greatest diversity of treatment and incident. the work of phidias, the most renowned of greek sculptors, is largely represented in the british museum by noble examples, showing his great personality, wonderful power, and his remarkable influence upon contemporary and later plastic art. the parthenon, or temple of the goddess athene, which was built upon the acropolis at athens by ictinus and callicrates, b.c. - , was enriched with splendid works of sculpture by phidias. many of the originals are now in the british museum forming part of the elgin marbles, which were purchased from the earl of elgin, in . the two pediments of the temple contained figure sculpture in the round, larger than life size. the eastern group represents the birth of athene, and the western group the contest of athene and poseidon elevatiorl of the bxrthenqn. athens. for the soil of attica. the fragments of these pedimental groups are now in the british museum, and, though sadly mutilated, show the perfection of sculpture during the phidian age. of the square metopes sculptured in high relief, that enriched the doric frieze, are included in the elgin marbles. the subject represented on these metopes was the battle between the centaurs and lapithae, or greeks, —a fine example of composition of line and mass, and dramatic power of expression. domc frieze . (the pakthemom . athem . the continuous frieze upon the upper part of the cella wall, under the colonnade or peristyle, was feet from the ground, inches in height, and feet in length. it was carved in low relief, the subject being the panathenasic procession, the most sacred and splendid of the religious festivals of the ancient greeks. this frieze, with its rhythm of movement and unity of composition, its groups of beautiful youths and maidens, sons and daughters of noble citizens, roman architecture. plate . oman architecture is differentiated from that of greece by the extensive use of the arch and of superposed orders. the many fine remains of roman temples and public buildings show the extraordinary versatility and conception of the roman architects, their constructive skill, and their remarkable power of assimilating the arts of other nations. the roman temples were somewhat similar in plan to their greek prototypes, but usually without the side colonnade, larger in scale, and with an ostentatious display of mouldings and ornaments, less refined in contour and detail. optim's rortisymi;, yvf principi&vs io insicmbv urtvribv* eqhvm dom for. iso ve - p q b.. n u i i j r apvch of septi^ius evezru at a typical example is given here of a triumphal arch, namely, that of septimus severus, a.d. . other examples are the arch of titus, a.d. , and the arch of constantine, a.d. , all near the forum at rome. trajan's arch, a.d. , was destroyed by con- stantine, who used many of the reliefs for the building of his own arch. the superposition of columns and arches is seen in the theatre of marcellus, b.c. , where the lower order is of the doric and the upper of the ionic, and, like the early greek theatre, was semi-circular in plan. the colosseum, commenced by vespasian, a.d. , and completed plah of the house of pansa-fcmpeii the oam)cm , and splendour of embellishment. the skilful planning and appro- priateness of decorative treatment in their basilicas and amphitheatres are evidences of the practical nature of the romans. the basilica or hall of justice was an important architectural feature, rectangular in plan, with a semi-circular apse at one end, where the tribunal was placed; roofed with timber framing, or vaulted with concrete, and supported with rows of columns or piers. the remains of two typical roman basilicas are still in existence: the basilica of trajan, a.d. , rectangular, by ft., five aisles, the centre aisle with a semi-circular wooden roof, and enriched with bronze plates, is typical of one class; and the basilica of maxentinus, a.d. , with a width of ft, and a length of ft, is typical of a vaulted basilica, the two side aisles with an arched roof, and the centre aisle with an intersecting vaulted roof. these roman basilicas were adopted by the early christians to their service, and the basilica church became the typical form used up to the th century in the romanesque provinces. the roman houses were of two types: the domus, or houses clustered together, and the insular, houses which were surrounded by streets. most of the finest pompeian houses were of the insular type. the usual plan of a roman house consisted of the ostium, an entrance or vestibule, which opened into the atrium, a large room or court partly roofed over, with an opening in the centre called the conpluvium, under which was the impluvium, or cistern of water, placed below the level of the ground. small chambers surround- ed the atrium, and at the further end was the tablinum or private room, frequently leading to the peristylium or private part of the house, an open court, with a colonnade surrounding a marble fountain,with flowers, shrubs, and trees, forming a viridarium. sur- rounding the peristylium were private rooms, one of which was the tri- clinium, or dining room. from the peristylium, fauces or passages led to the porticus, a colonnade which overlooked the garden. roman ornament. plate , fk.ie e.ror.um of trajam. lateivan museutt. fig i twamgular. base ora/"vw,lc caridelabmjm . bmtish c nr-, a n mo ad loman ornament. rome, founded by romulus, b.c. , became by successive wars and conquests the mistress of the world, absorbing the arts and the architecture of the etruscans b.c. , the samnites b.c. , and of corinth and carthage b.c. . from these varied sources arose the style termed roman, assimilating and adopting the column and the horizontal entablature of the greeks; the arch, the vault, the mural paintings, and the decorative use of bronze and terra- cotta of the etruscans, with the sculpture, ornament, mosaics and coinage of the greeks and carthaginians. these varied arts were assimilated and perfected by the romans during the period b.c. to a.d. roman ornament is the continuity of the greek and etruscan styles, consisting of the anthenhenr the acanthus and the scroll; the romans using these forms with greater exuberance and elaboration, together with bold and vigorous carving, yet lacking the simplicity, refinement, and graceful contour of the greek and etruscan forms. roman ornament consists largely of continuous spiral lines, clothed with cups and sheaths of acanthus foliage, the various spirals ter- minating in a rosette. these main spirals are frequently interwoven with fine curved or spiral lines, clothed with acanthus or other foli- ation, such as the vine, olive and ivy. birds and reptilesandcupids, and the chimera or griffin (fig. ) are often interspersed with the ornament, thus giving that large- ness of mass, and contrast of form, which is so characteristic of roman art. the thermae, or baths and public buildings, dis- played fine decorative ceilings, having deep sunk panels called lacunaria, or coffers; square, hexagonal or octagonal in form, with a centre rosette in high re- lief and the border mouldings of the coffers being enriched with the egg and dart, or the water leaf. these exhibit an effective treatment of moulded surfaces. the ceilings of the tombs and palaces were in many cases ornamented ompeian ornament. pompeii, herculaneum and stabia, roman cities, were buried by an eruption of vesuvius, a.d. . these cities had already suffered from an earthquake, a.d. , and were being rapidly rebuilt when they were finally destroyed by the eruption. the younger pliny, the historian, was a spectator of the event at pompeii, and wrote two letters to his friend tacitus, describing the event and his flight from the doomed city, which remained buried for seventeen centuries, with the treasures of gold and silver, bronzes of rare work- manship, mural paintings on a most magnificent scale, and floors of mosaics of marvellous execution and design; everything affording a vivid glimpse of the domestic and public life of the romans of the st century a.d. herculaneum was discovered in , and pompeii , and from these cities many valuable remains of art have been taken. in the museum at naples there are over , mural paintings, some , small bronzes, over large bronzes of figures and busts, and fine large mosaics. a plan of a roman house is given on page showing the arrange- ment and use of the rooms. the floors covered with mosaics (see plate ), those of the vestibule, corridors, and small rooms having simple patterns enclosed with borders of the key pattern, or the guilloche in black, red, grey, and white tesseriae. the floor of the triclinium, or dining room, was often a magnificent mosaic representing some mythqlogical or classical subject. the walls were painted in colour, usually with a dado ^th the height of the wall, with pilasters dividing the wall into rectangular panels and a frieze above (plate ). the general scheme of colour was, the dado and pilasters black, the panels red, and the frieze white; or black dado, red pilasters and frieze, with white or yellow panels. the decorations upon these various coloured grounds was light and fanciful, and painted with great delicacy. representations of architectural forms, such as columns and entablatures, are often rendered in perspective upon the painted walls. the painted ornament has somewhat the same characteristics as the roman relief work, but is usually much more delicate in treat- ment. the spiral form and the sheath are always prevalent, and from these sheaths and cups grow the finer tendrils or delicately painted spray of foliage, upon which birds are placed. stucco enrichments, such as ornamental string courses and mould- ings, were frequently combined with the painted ornament; they consist of small details, such as the water-leaf, the egg and dart, and the anthemion, and are repeated in a regular series. herculaneum differed considerably from pompeii, for the finest works of art and innumerable mss. have been found, shewing that a higher intellectual life existed than that at pompeii, where not a single ms. has been found. it is probable that herculaneum was equal to athens itself in the wealth of its art treasures. byzantine ornament. plate lily capital. st harks. pierced f marble screen sf marks. vitale ravenna sahcophaoi of theod us "cemtukr'. s apolltnart. kavettma . ierced marble. cafwed pamel im alada tek nvj^ stavarks . vemice i yzantine ornament. the decline of the roman empire, in the rd and th centuries a.d., had its inevit- able influence upon contemporary art, but perhaps a more potent influence was that of christianity, which, under the reign of constantine, received state recognition and support; and when this emperor removed the seat of government from rome to byzantium, the traditional greek and roman arts were assimilated with those of persia and syria, but moulded and influenced by the new religion, giving that strong vitality, deep significance, and symbolism which is so remark- able a feature of the byzantine style. the change of style did not take place immediately, for most of the buildings erected by constantine were in the traditional roman style, but the arts were gradually perfected until they culminated in the building of s. sophia, by anthemius of tralles and isidorus of miletus, during the reign of justinian, a.d. . this building is remarkable for its splendid dome, supported by semi-domes and pendentives on a square plan (see plate ), its embellishment with mosaics of glorious colours, and the great inventiveness and symbol- ism of the detail. the traditional sharp acanthus foliage of the greeks was united with the emblems of christianity, such as the circle, the cross, the vine, and the dove: the peacock also is fre- quently seen. figure sculpture was rarely used, but groups of figures were used in great profusion in the gold-ground mosaics that covered the upper part of the walls and the vaults and domes of the magnifi- cent byzantine buildings. the churches of ravenna, in italy, have somewhat similar characteristics: s. vitale, a.d. , the basilica churches of s. apollinare nuovo, a.d. - , s. apollinare in classe, a.d. - , together with the baptisteries, are rich in mosaics and sculptured capitals of the th and th centuries. in the cathedrals of torcello, a.d. , and murano, and the beautiful s. mark's at venice, marbles and mosaics were used in great pro- fusion to enhance the architecture. the sketch plans given on plate are typical of byzantine planning, in which the symbolism of the circle and cross are used as constructive features. this sym- bolism is a marked feature in byzantine ornament; interlacing circles and crosses mingle with the acanthus or the vine, and are cut with a peculiar v-shaped section. the circular drill is largely used at the sinking of the leaves, and but little of the background is visible in the sculptured ornament of this period. pierced marble screens of interlaced foliage, or the fret in combina- tion with the circle, were frequently used (see plate ). a large number of pierced parapets in s. mark's are carved in low relief, with various modifications of the interlacing guilloche, or circles. romanesque ornament. plate . romanesque architecture &p ornament. romanesque architecture differs from roman chiefly in the universal use of the arch, the absence of the classic entablature, and in the imagery and symbol- ism of its sculpture and ornament, doubtless due to northern influence. one of the earliest existing buildings of this style is the church of s. ambrogio, milan (nth century), which has a nave and aisles, three eastern apses, and a western atrium, surrounded by an open arcade, enriched with vigorous reliefs of interlaced orna- ment and animals. contemporary in date is s. michele, pavia, with a nave and transepts and central cupola: there is a single eastern apse, having an open external gallery and bands of sculptured orna- ment. this and the frequent use of the lion or griffin as a support for pillars, are characteristic of the lombardic style, and are seen at s. michele, lucca, and the cathedral, baptistry, and the campanile of pisa. it was, however, in france and germany that the romanesque reached its highest development, principally in the south and south- west of france, where the churches are distinguished for the richness of the west fronts. s. trophime, arles ( th century), has a fine low semi-circular pro- jecting porch, resting upon a sculptured frieze and pillars. a cloister, with arcading of coupled columns richly sculptured, is attached to this church; while s. gilles ( ) has a low projecting porch of three arches, enriched with vigorous sculpture and ornament (plate ). the cathedral at angouleme has a vaulted nave, with three cupolas, and a west front with recessed arcading and figures: two square towers, with open arcading and conical spires, rise from the angles of the facade. notre dame, poitiers, is even more rich in its gabled west front, having a fine doorway with two tiers of arcading above. the facade is flanked by two circular turrets, with massive columns attached, having an open arcade above, with a conical spire; enriched corbel tables are carried across the front, over the door, the upper arcade and window, and round the turrets. saint-front, perigueux, has a richly sculptured west front and nave of the nth century, to which was added in a larger church similar in plan to s. mark's at venice (a greek cross, see plate ), and roofed with five cupolas in stone. in central france there was the magnificent abbey church of cluny, with its range of six towers; and in germany this number of towers is found at the great roman- esque churches of speyer, worms, and laach, with their singular western apse and external clearstory gallery. plate illustrates a few of the chief features of romanesque ornament. the upper frieze is similar to the roman scroll, but less vigorous in modelling, and with a rounder form of serration of leaf form. the laon capital has rich interlacing ornament and animals that suggest scandinavian influence. the portal of saint-gilles shows the exuberant carving and storiation that characterized many of the churches of south-west france. c celtic ornament. plate . initial the gospels of lii-tdl faiv e cndor/'-ceniurr, celtic intou.accino inrrhlaccd ahimals. rxon the book bmtish / spiral shield cnmched with *ed the ook of eltic ornament. no period in the history of art is more remarkable than the celtic. the carved stone architecture and crosses, the bronzes, enamels, and silversmith's work, the splendid illuminated books and manuscripts with capitals and borders, full of imagery and intricacy of detail, and the clear and accurate writing of the text are all indications of the culture and love of ornament of the early irish people, showing a remarkable preference for the spiral and interlacing forms. the bronze shield (fig. ), with its spirals and bosses of enamel enriched with the northern " fylfot " is a typical example of the nd or rd century, a.d. then comes the trumpet pattern or divergent spiral, which, seen in its infancy on the bronze shield, reached a great degree of elaboration in the th and th centuries, a.d. (figs. to ), being typical of celtic work up to the middle of the th century when all trace of this spiral is lost. the interlacing bird and animal forms used from the th to the th centuries are doubtless derived from byzantine and lombardic sources. the serpent or dragon, which is such a marked feature from the th to the th century must have been borrowed from the north, as ireland had no traditions of snakes or dragons, and it is to scandinavia, with its legend of fafni, that we must look for the origin of the dracontine treatment. it is this zor- morpic character that distinguishes the celtic from all other styles of ornament except scandinavian. the obverse of the magnificent processional cross of cong (a.d. ), is divided into panels of decorations, and convoluted snakes occupy of them. the illustrations given here from the lismore crosier are typical examples of this celtic dracontine treatment. the early or pagan period is noted for its bronze work, cast and wrought, and enriched with champleve enamels. the fine chalice of ardagh (page ) and the tara brooch (plate ) th century, are splendid examples of the christian period dating from st. patrick, a.d. - . the beautiful book of kells, the book of armagh, the book of durrow, manuscripts of the early part of the th century (trinity college, dublin), and the book of durham, called the lindisfarne gospels, a.d. - , written by eadfrith, and illuminated by ethelwald, are a tribute to the vitality, assimilation of ideas, and the culture and wonderful craftmanship of the early irish people. in irish manuscripts gold is not used, except in the lindisfarne gospels, where a minute quantity is used. orman ftp gothic architecture. english gothic architecture has been broadly divided into periods for the purpose of classifying the styles, the following being the most generally accepted :— by sharpe. a.d. roman-/saxon esque \ norman - - gothic jlancet - /"transitional - - | curvilinear - i rectilinear - bv rlckman. a.d. norman - i - early english - - decorated - - perpendicular - - tudor - - - most of our magnificent cathedrals were founded, a.d. - , by norman bishops, some upon the old saxon foundations, such as canterbury and york, or near the original saxon buildings, as at winchester, or upon new sites, such as norwich and peterborough; and were without exception more magnificent erections than those of the anterior period, portions of the older style still existing in many cathedrals, showing the fusion of roman and byzantine archi- tecture with the more personal and vigorous art of the celtic, saxon, and scandinavian peoples. lincoln is a typical english plan, showing no trace of the semi- circular apsidal arrangement so universal in norman and french cathedrals. each vertical division in the nave, the choir, and transept is termed a bay. on plate is an illus- tration of four typical bays of english cathedrals, showing the development of style from the th to the th century. the general characteristic of each bay is given separately, but obviously it can only be approximate, as the building of each cathedral was influenced by local considera- tions, each period necessarily overlapping its predecessor, thus forming a transitional style. for instance, in the choir of ripon cathedral the aisle and clearstory have semi-circular norman windows, and the nave arcading has pointed arches. in the triforium and clearstory arcading, round arches are seen side by side with the pointed arch. the piers —sometimes termed columns—of these bays have "the seven periods of church architecture," by edmund sharpe. "gothic architecture," by thomas rickman. early english or lancet period. the lancet or pointed arch universal. capitals, of three lobed foliage and circular abacus. the pier arch mouldings, alternate rounds and hollows deeply cut and enriched with the characteristic dog's tooth ornament. a hood moulding which terminates in bosses of foliage or sculptured heads invariably surrounds the arch mouldings. this moulded hood when used ex- ternally is termed a " dripstone," and when used horizontally over a square headed window, a " label." the triforium has a single or double arch, which covers the smaller or subordinate arches, the spandrels being enriched with a sunk or pierced trefoil or quatrefoil. the triforium piers are solid, having delicate shafts attached to them, carrying arch mouldings of three orders, and enriched with the dog's tooth ornament or trefoil foliage. the clearstory lancet windows are in triplets, with an arcading on the inner face of the wall. the vaulting shaft occasionally springs from the floor, but more usually from a corbel above the nave capitals, and finishes under the clearstory string with an enriched capital, from which springs the simple vaulting usually quadripartite or hexapartite in form. early windows in small churches were arranged in couplets, and at the east end, usually in triplets, with grisaille stained glass. the example given on the previous page from the east end of rievaulx abbey shows a finely proportioned window and its arrange- ment. figure sculpture, beautiful and refined in treatment, was fre- quently used upon external walls. the figures of saints and bishops were placed singly under triangular pediments and cusped arches, of which there are fine examples at wells, lichfield, exeter, and salisbury (fig. , plate ). splendid examples of circular rose windows are to be seen in the north and south transepts of lincoln cathedral, also at york, but they are comparatively rare in england, while france possesses over of the finest and most important examples of this type. they are to be seen in the cathedrals of notre dame, rouen, chartres, and rheims. decorated or geometric period. in this, the piers have engaged shafts, with capitals having plain mouldings, or enriched with finely carved foliage of the oak, maple, or mallow, seen in perfection at southwell minster, which contains the finest carving of this period— - (plate ). the pier arches have mouldings of three orders, also enriched, usually with the characteristic ball, flower, or foliage, similar to that upon the capitals. the triforium consists of double arches, with subordinate cusped arches adorned with geometric tracery. the inner arcading of the clearstory is absent, the one large window being divided by mullions the triforium & clearstory. plate . r?or. d/qr> fl • direct v ©ecxdemlc perpercdicl uflr- four qflyb optypicflli ef?©liish cflthedrhli ™ to we ist" cer?to ry and geometrical tracery, or by equilateral triangles enriched with circular and bar tracery (fig. , plate ). above the pier capitals an enriched corbel is usually placed from which springs the vaulting shafts, terminating with a richly carved capital under the clearstory string. the aisle arcading, as a rule, is very beautiful, having geo- metric tracery and finely proportioned mouldings, the aisle windows with mullions and bold geometric tracery. the circular rose windows of the transepts are typical of this period. perpendicular and tudor. the piers of this style are lofty and enriched with shallow mouldings carried round the pier arch, where capitals are introduced. they frequently resemble a band round the pier at the springing of the arch, or occasionally they are octagonal in form, and decorated with an angular treatment of the vine. in some instances the upper part of the plain octagonal capital is relieved with an embattlement. the latter is also frequently used as a cresting for the elaborate per- pendicular screens, or for relieving the clearstory strings, or on the transoms or the lofty windows. the triforium is absent in this period, the bay consisting of two horizontal divisions only. the clearstory, owing to the sup- pression of the triforium, becomes of more importance. the windows are large and often in pairs, with vertical mullions extending to the arch mouldings of the window head. the aisle windows are similar, and when lofty have horizontal transoms, on which the battlement ornament is displayed. the aisle arcading being also suppressed, all plain wall space was covered with perpendicular surface tracery. enrichment of this type was used in the greatest profusion upon walls, parapets, buttresses, and arches, also upon the jambs and soffits of doorways. this, together with the use of the four-centred arch, forms the characteristic feature of the perpendicular or tudor period. the remarkable growth of the gothic style during the th and th centuries was contemporary in england, france, flanders, germany, and in a less degree in italy. one of the most beautiful churches in italy is s. maria della spina, at pisa, with its rich crocketed spires and canopies, features which were repeated a little later at the tomb of the famous scaligers at verona. gothic is differentiated by the use of the ogee arch with cusps and pierced quatrefoils. at venice there are many magnificent examples of gothic archi- tecture, remarkable for the beautiful central grouping of the windows, arcades, and balconies and the prevalence of the ogee arch, with cusps and pierced quatrefoils and rich foliated capitals. the facade of the doge's palace, with its great colonnade of pillars with rich foliated capitals (see ruskin's "seven lamps of architecture," plate v.), and the porta della carta, or entrance, with its magnifi- cent doorway flanked by figures and canopies and surmounted by a traceried window, and gable enriched with exquisitely carved crockets and finials of foliage and figures, are by bartolommeno buon ( - ), who also built the foscari palace. other examples are the casa, or ca d'oro, and the palazzi pisani, conterini fasan, and danieli, each with beautiful grouping of windows, pierced quatrefoil, and rich balconies. it was in france and england that gothic architecture reached its culmination. the abbeys and cathedrals, with spires and towers enriched with vigorous and beautiful sculpture, arcadings and cano- pies, with cusps, crockets, and finials, and the splendid traceried windows, filled with glorious stained glass, are all tributes to the religious zeal and splendid craftsmanship of the middle ages. the west fronts of the larger cathedrals of france have deeply- recessed triple porches, covered with figure sculpture (page ), magnificent towers with lofty open tracery, as at amiens and rheims, and splendid rose windows, as those of chartres (an early example of plate tracery), rheims, amiens, and the cathedral and s. ouen at rouen, the two latter with rich flamboyant tracery. french cathedrals are invariably of the periapsidal plan, with the semi-circular eastern ambulatory, surrounded by three or five radia- ting chapels. aisle chapels also are frequently introduced between the bases of the flying buttresses, giving a greater width across the church. in early cathedrals, the triforium chamber, or upper aisle and its arcade, was similar to english examples; but early in the th century the triforium gallery was reduced to the thickness of the nave wall, and the outer arcading glazed. later, the triforium, with its glazed arcading, became merged into the great clearstory windows, with their wealth and glory of coloured glass. english cathedrals show a marked contrast in scale to contem- porary french buildings. the english nave and choir are less in height and width but greater in length than french cathedrals. for instance, westminster is the highest of our english cathedrals, with its nave and choir ft. from floor to roof, ft. wide, and ft. in length. york is next with ft. from floor to roof, ft. wide, and ft. in length. salisbury is ft. from floor to roof, ft. wide, and ft. in length; and canterbury ft. from floor to roof, ft. wide, and ft. in length. lincoln with ft. and peter- borough with ft. are the only other examples reaching ft. in height: york, with ft, being the only one reaching above ft. in width of nave. the measurements of contemporary french cathedrals, on the other hand, being as follows:—chartres, ft. from floor to roof, ft. wide, and ft. in length; notre dame, ft. from floor to roof, ft. wide, and ft. in length; rheims, ft. from floor to roof, ft. wide, and ft. in length; while that at beauvais reaches the great height of ft. in the nave, ft. in width, and only ft. in length. i orman ornament. norman architecture was distinguished by the use of the traditional semi-circular arch, superseded by the pointed arch of the early gothic period. these semi-circular arches in the earlier dates were decorated with rudely executed carvings, cut or worked with the axe. later norman work is very rich, the mouldings being well carved with enrichments of the chevron, the cable, pallet, star, fret or key patterns; the lozenge and the beading or pearling. characteristic features of this period also are the beakhead (fig. ), and the corbel-table, which was a series of heads of men or animals, from which spring small arches supporting the parapet. many rich examples of norman surface ornament are still extant; at christ- church, hants, a beautiful intersecting arcading of semi-circular arches occurs, the enrichment above being a scale or imbricated pattern; at st. peter's, northampton, a very rich example of surface ornamenta- tion may be seen (fig. ). floral forms are but rarely used in norman ornament; instances are known of the use of the rose and the fir-apple, but they are the exception and not the rule. early doorways usually have a square head recessed under semi- circular arch mouldings, decorated with the chevron, key, or beak- head. the semi-circular tympanum over the door was plain or enriched with rude sculpture in low relief. later doors show a great profusion of ornament in the archivolt and arch mouldings, which are often carried down the jamb mouldings. the recessed columns are also enriched with the chevron, or diagonal lines of pearling (fig. ), and have sculptured capitals showing a classical tendency in the arrangement of acanthus foliage and the volute. fine examples of this period may be seen in the west front of lincoln cathedral (fig. ), the galilee porch at durham, and the west door of iffley church, oxfordshire. a fine, deeply recessed semi-circular norman doorway is at tutbury church, having a richly recessed window over, now filled with flamboyant tracery. early norman capitals are usually cubical or cushion-shaped, with a square or cruciform abacus, or occasionally octagonal as at durham, or circular as at gloucester, and enriched with the chevron, star, or anthemion. the capitals being escalloped with segments of circles, or enriched with volutes or the anthemion. early examples are in the white tower, and st. bartholomew, london. later capitals, usually rich in ornamentation, are found at st. peter's, northampton and wooton, or more frequently that have interlacing bands of orna- ment and animals; others with figures or " storied capitals," as in the north porch, wells. in the transition period—end of th century—capitals were con- cave or bell-shaped, with foliage of the serrated water-leaf type clinging to the bell and turning up under the abacus, forming a volute. this foliage was varied in type and vigorous in technique. fine examples are at christ church, oxford, and at canterbury cathedral. arly gothic. the norman style was succeeded by the pointed, or gothic style, remarkable for its variety, its beauty of proportion, and the singular grace and vigour of its ornament. showing no traditions, beyond sicilian and arabian influence, it grew rapidly, and reached a high degree of perfection in france and england. the massive and barbaric character of the norman style gave place to the light clustered shafts and well-proportioned mouldings of the early english gothic, with its capitals characterised by a circular abacus, and the typical three-lobed foliage growing upwards from the necking of the shafts, thence spreading out in beautiful curves and spirals under the abacus. this tendency to the spiral line is peculiar to the early gothic, and differentiates it from the decorated and perpendicular period. the diagrams of the three crockets here given show the distinctive character of english gothic ornament. cr.ock.ei; atc ©oth early gothic, three-lobed leaves arranged in spiral lines. decorated gothic, with natural types of foliage, such as the oak and maple, with a flowing indulating line. perpendicular gothic, showing the vine and leaves as elements, and arranged in a square and angular manner. the same features and characteristics are observed in the borders here given. the beautiful carved span- dril from the chancel arcade, stone church, kent (fig. ), is one of the most beautiful examples of english ornament, remarkable for the vigour and flexibility of curve, its recurring forms of ornamen- tation, and admirable spacing, typical of much of our early eng- lish foliage from about - . the type of foliage in early english stained glass is somewhat similar to contemporary carved work, but showing more of the profile of the leaf, and it has a geometric or radiating arrangement in addition to the spiral forms of foliage (plate ), and the admir- able spacing of the ornament shows the skill in design that the mediaeval craftsman possessed. decorated gothic details. plate . s perpendicular details. plate . cop.n ce fp.cn b hop beckihgtopi' hrimc well} cathedral tudor flowtr westmimster from uftord church . uffolk crcem to law chapel manchester. cathedral upper pact orsouth porch. lavemhah chufcch.surfolk q netplact n tatter hau. ca tlp lincdnshirc - erpendicular gothic. late or rectilinear gothic is characterized by a rigidity of line in construction and ornament. the one exception is the beautiful fan-vaulting, such as that in the cloisters at gloucester cathedral, and in henry .vi i. chapel at westminster, which are not approached by any continental example for beauty of craftsmanship or the scientific precision of their masonry. the many splendid towers, having elaborate panelled tracery, and capped with pinnacles, open parapets, and battlements, such as those at wrexham and s. mary's, taunton, are also characteristic of this period. the windows, with vertical mullions running to the window-head, which is frequently a four-centred arch, have one or more transoms, enriched with battle- ments or tudor flowers, to divide the lofty windows horizontally (plate ). the many choir screens and stalls, with their canopies, have panels, friezes, crestings, and finials, and are frequently carved with an angular treatment of the vine and its tendrils, more or less conventionalized (figs. - ), the tudor flower being perhaps the most prevalent. the freedom and flexibility of the modelling and carving of the middle period of gothic, was replaced by a stiff symmetrical arrangement of foliage, and the painted diapers succeeded the carved ones of the earlier period. the terminals of the ends of pews were frequently en- riched with foliated "poppy-heads," often of great beauty. heraldic forms, such as shields, with their supporters, together with badges and crests, were largely associated with the ornament in the richer buildings of this per- iod, such as king's college chapel at cambridge, and henry viii.'s chapel at west- minster. the piers of the nave are usually rectangular or lozenge in section, consisting of a few rounds and double ogee moulds, which are fre- quently carried round the arch without the intervening capital; or an octagonal capital, with the typical square foliated ornament, is carried by some of the round members of the pier; or a series of moulded capitals, without enrichment, is employed. the only enrichment in the hollows of the strings and arch-mouldings is a four-petalled flower, alternate square and circular (figs. and ). renascence ornament. plate , e r*dn tmt bromze g*tc or tht evwtisttlw - - . ouattivocemto pace rr(,m the book of hourj.of bona spoivxv,duchc ormilah onti h -cotta on dellaiv olawa/,£ y luca delia w bbia, i - o in tw; chukcm or s onorwo (ftlmted orviamemt tron the ducal palace mamtua by giovanni da udine anojulio romano i o enascence architecture ornament. lombardy, in the north of italy, had witnessed a singular blending of the old classic art with the vigorous traditions and myths of the longobards, and the symbolisms of the old byzantine; thus producing the architecture known as lombardic, with its multiplicity of small columns and arches, quaint imagery of sculpture, and the frequent use of a lion or dragon as a support for the columns. these are features of the early art at lucca, and at bergamo, padua, verona, and other towns in lombardy (see romanesque, page ); a beautiful illustration from lucca is given in the appendix to ruskin's " stones of venice," vol. . contemporary with this period came the gothic influence with its clustered columns, pointed arches, its cusps and crockets, and its strong vitality, impressing the arts and architecture with a lasting influence; hence, during the th and th cen- turies in italy, this intermingling of styles, traditions, religious beliefs and myths, produced an art barbaric and vigorous in character, the imagery full of suggestiveness, and the detail rich and varied in con- ception. yet it was but the herald of a style which culminated in the glorious epoch of the renascence, a style where symmetry was to play an important part, as in classic art, where refinement of line and detail, of culture and craftsmanship, are found; and which, though beautiful in proportion, unity of parts, and perfect adaptability, yet lacked that symbolism, suggestiveness, inventiveness and rugged strength of the early byzantine, lombardic, and gothic styles. italian renascence is broadly divided into three periods, viz. :— the tre-cento, or transitional, a.d. - ; the quattro-cento, - ; and the cinque-cento, - . in the tre-cento period the sculpture and decorative arts are marked by dignity of conception, and a mingling of gothic and classic tradi- tions. one of the earliest examples is the hexagonal pulpit in the baptistery at pisa, and in the cathedral at siena, by nicolo pisano ( - ), where sculptured panels distinctly classic in treatment, are associated with cusped gothic arches. nicolo also executed the beautiful octagonal fountain at perugia, and was assisted in much of his work by his son giovanni pisano, who also executed the pulpit in the cathedral at pisa. a fine monumental work of this period having similar characteristics, is the tomb of s. peter the martyr, in the church of s. eustovgio, at milan, by balducco di pisa ( - ). in the architecture of this period, gothic forms prevail, together with the use of panelling of white and grey marble, lofty pilasters, pinnacles and gables, enriched with a geometric patterning of marbles or mosaic, and a frequent use of the slender twisted pillar. the cathedral at florence, with its panelling, pointed arches, and rich tracery, was by arnolfo di cambio (died ), and francesco talenti, who completed the nave, choir, and apses in . arnolfo and talenti were also the architects for the church of santo croce ( - ), and the palazzo vecchio, florence, ( ), where, in , michelozzo added the beautiful cortile, and c. salviati and de faenza, pupils of vasari, enriched the circular and octagonal pillars with beautiful stucco ornamentation (fig. . plate ), in . the beautiful campanile by giotto ( ), andrea pisano, and francesco talenti, who introduced the upper gothic windows, is a noble accessory to the cathedral of florence. a charming illustration of one of these windows is given in the "seven lamps of architecture," by john ruskin. in arnolfo introduced some prato marble pilasters at the angles of" san giovanni," the octagonal florentine baptistery, an ancient building where many of the great citizens of the republic received their baptism, and it was here that dante was baptised in may, . the last of the tre-cento masters was andrea pisano ( - ), who made the first bronze gate of " san giovanni," or the baptistery of florence. this gate has quatre-foil panels in relief, and bears the inscription "andreas ugolini nini me fecit, a.d. mcccxxx." the true renascence or quattro-cento period is remarkable for the vitality of the arts, and the naturalism and versatility of its crafts- men. brunelleschi ( - ), is the first architect (page ), and lorenzo ghiberti ( - ) the ornamentist and sculptor, whose chief works are the two bronze gates for the florentine baptistery. the first gate ( - ), has quatre-foil panels similar to the monument to ilaria di carretto, by jacopo della quercia. renascence ornament. plate . r oim-iamer-lt .n mak.olc . .school r u>mbar.oi ve/iicc i oo mawir bviclimthe c«urc» of dt'mlfvacol), vetiicc imo b> flc *ndhi son ,tullicvid amtomlo and the individuality of his medals of the contemporary princes of italy, are exceedingly fine. among other remarkable medallists, were sperandio of verona ( - ), caradossa of milan ( - ! ), vincentine of vicenza ( - ), benvenuto cellini of florence ( - ), lione leoni ( - ), pompeoni leoni ( - o), and pastorino of siena ( - ). other names of this period were desiderio da settignano ( - ), his masterpiece being the tomb of carlo marzuppini, in the church of santa croce, florence; mino da fiesole ( - , see frontispiece); andrea verrocchio ( - ), the author of the fine equestrian statue of bartolommeo colleone at venice (see bronzes); matteo civitali ( - ); and the rossellini, a remarkable family of five brothers, of which the most famous was antonio rossellini ( - ), who executed a charming tomb to cardinal jacopo di portogallo, in the church of the nunziata, florence. the cinque-cento period was the culmination of the renascence, when architecture, sculpture, painting, and the decorative arts, were under the magnificent patronage of the popes and princes of italy. palaces, churches, and public buildings were completed (see renas- cence architecture, pages - ), and embellished with beautiful sculptures and decorations; hung with the most sumptuous fabrics of the venetian, florentine, and genoese looms; decorated with altar paintings and mural decorations by the most renowned of painters; and enriched with the magnificent productions of the gold and silversmiths' art, and the loveliest of intarsia, or inlaid woodwork. the sistine chapel, built for sfxtus iv., in , by baccio pintelli, is decorated with fresco paintings on the walls by the great cinque-cento masters, luca signorelli ( - ), sandro botticelli ( - ), cos- imo rosselli ( - ), perugino, the master of raphael ( - ), domenico ghirlandajo ( - ), and michel angelo ( - ), who painted "the last judgment," on the end wall, and the famous ceiling, with incidents from the old testa- ment, and with the prophets joel, ezekiel, jeremiah, jonah, daniel, isaiah, and zechariah, and the sibyls erithraea, perscia, lybica, cumaea, and delphica. these are splendid examples of decorative painting, where unity and dignity of conception, powerful draughtsmanship, and marvellous execution are shown in a remarkable degree. the new sacristy of san lorenzo, florence, designed and executed by michel angelo, having the magnificent tombs of lorenzo and thecun/cah sibyl by michel ahgelo a roman gardens—were utilised by raphael in the decoration of the pilasters, piers, and walls of the loggie. the designs were painted with a fine range of colour upon white ground, and enclosed within borders of modelled stucco ornaments. in the panels upon the ceil- ing, raphael painted a series of fifty-two in- cidents of the bible. these are spoken of as "raphael's bible." raphael was assisted in this work by many con- temporary artists and pupils; giovanni da udine, giulio romano, francesco penni, per- ino del vaga, and pri- maticcio ( - ,) who completed the work after raphael's death. these artists carried the traditions and methods to other parts of italy. giulio romano execu- ted some fine mural paintings at the villa madama, rome; and for federigo gonzaga, duke of mantua, he enriched with beautiful paintings and arabesques the palazzo ducale, and the palazzo del te. these arabesques were upon richly-coloured or parti-coloured grounds (see plates - , " grammar of ornament," by owen jones). perino del vaga carried the art to genoa, where at the palazzo andrea doria he executed many admirable examples of coloured arabesques (see plates - , " palast-architakur, genua "). these painted arabesques show a great inventiveness and skilful combination of parts, but they are not to be compared with the refined and beautiful modelling, and harmonious composition of the contemporary carved reliefs by andrea sansovino ( - ), jacopo sansovino ( - ), agostino busti, pietro lombard o ( ), and his sons, tullio and antonio. these delicate reliefs have the traditional roman acanthus, but treated with a refined feeling for modelling, and beauty and symmetry of line and mass. in many examples, vases, masks, shields, and similar accessories are found in profusion (plate ). the composition of the cinque- cento ornament is usually symmetrical, the details being varied and interesting in the best examples; and whilst lacking the vigour and arabesque decotwlom- vaticam- the triumph of julius ge ak , fmezc byahdrla ft li|pi is*". m* u symbolism of the lombardic and byzantine styles, it excelled them in its absolute adaptation to architectural conditions, with perfection of design and craftsmanship. magnificent examples of decoration by pinturicchio are in the sala piccolomini, siena, and by perugino in the sala del cambio, perugia, where some of the earliest painted arabesques are upon a dark ground. andrea mantegna ( - ) executed nine paintings or cartoons in tempera upon linen, representing the triumphs of julius caesar, which are a portion of a frieze ft. high and ft. long, painted for lodovico gonzaga's palace of s. sebastian, at mantua. they were purchased by charles i., and are now at hampton court. an illustration of this frieze, from an engraving upon copper in the british museum, is given here. it was also engraved on wood by andrea andreani in . to mantegna is also ascribed the illustrations to the "hypnero- tomachia, or dream of poliphilus," printed in , at venice, by aldus manutius. good reproductions of many of these early illustrated books are given in the "italian book illustrations," by a. w. pollard, no. of the portfolio, december ; and in "the decorative illustration of books," by walter crane. • the study of classical architecture was stimulated by the publica- tion at rome, in , of the treatise by vitruvius, an architect of the time of augustus; an edition was also published at florence in , and at venice in . in , fra giocondo, at venice, published "the five books of architecture," by andrea palladio ( - ). another treatise upon architecture, by serlio ( - ), was also published at venice in and . beautiful types of the renascence decorative art were the venetian well-heads, situated as they were in most of the public squares of venice, and in many of the court-yards of her princely palaces. designed with details of the most varied and beautiful character by such artists as andrea sansovino, pietro lombardo, and his sons tullio and antonio, the venetian well-head became a type of beauty, diversified in its treatment, but never losing its character- istics or its usefulness. venetian well-heads display a great variety of form and decoration, and are a tribute to the vivacity and artistic feeling of the venetian republic. the strozzi palace, florence. the renascence in italy was distinguished by the many magni- ficent ecclesiastical and secular buildings erected during the th and th centuries in the chief cities in italy. florence was the first to show activity, and with brunelleschi ( - ), the history of renascence architecture commences. the great dome of the cathedral ( - ), the pazzi chapel (with a fine frieze of cherubs' heads by donatello and settigiano) at s. croce ( ), and the church of s. lorenzo ( ), were his first works, and were followed by s. spirito( ) and the pitti palace. the severe dignity of the bold rusticated stone work, which was usually varied in each story, the circular-headed windows, and cornices of great depth and projection, became the type of the early palaces of florence and siena. the first renascence palace was the riccardi, built for cosimo de medici, in , by michelozzi: and it was followed by the pitti ( ) and the quaratesi ( ), by brunelleschi; the rucellai ( ), by leon battista alberti ( - ), where pilasters with their entablature were used for the first time in a renascence facade; the strozzi ( ), by m. da majano and cronaca; the gondi ( ), by g. da sangallo; the guadagni ( ), with sgraffito decorations in grey and white plaster; and the nicolini, by bramante ( - ); the pandolfini ( ), by raphael; and the bartolini ( ), by baccio d'agnolo. the plan of these palaces was usually a rect- angle, having an internal cortile, with open arcades on the ground floor, the next floor having windows, while the upper story was frequently open. the farnese palace, rome. in rome the palaces were characterized by largeness of scale, the frequent use of the pilaster or attached super-imposed columns, and square-headed windows, with triangular or segmental pediments. the plan is rectangular, with a cortile of one or more stories of open arcades of semi-circular arches, springing direct from the capital, as in the cancelleria palace. the chief palaces are the cancelleria ( ) and the giraud ( ), by bramante ( - ); the farnesina ( ), the massimi ( ), and the villa ossoli ( ), by baldassare peruzzi ( - ); the palma and the farnese ( ), by antonio sangallo ( - ); the villa madama ( ), by raffaello and giulio romano; the borghese ( ), by martino lunghi; the laterano ( ), by fontana; and the barberini ( ), by maderna, borro- mini, and bernini. the chief ecclesiastical building is s. peter's (plan, plate ,) com- menced in by albert! and rossellino for pope nicolas v.; then carried on by bramante and san gallo ( ), raphael and peruzzi ( - ), antonio da san gallo ( ), michel angelo ( ), vignola ( ), giacomo della porta ( ), and carlo maderna ( ). in s. peter's was dedicated by urban viii., and in the colonnade in the piazza was erected by bernini. e english renascence. plate , desjgtt for. a time-metre. by holbe m.i cahopy to stalls * cross .wihchester woodcabv no. a toh hall portiom of ceilino at a tom hall birmingham. podtion of henry vii tomb bytobr gian we tmim abbey ramel from the chiche ter tomb. piltom church,devofl ribs frequently had a repeating pattern impressed while the plaster was soft. occasionally a double frieze was used, the lower having delicate arabesques and strap-work, while the upper one had boldly- marked cartouches and arabesques. one of the most important examples of early renascence plaster is the frieze in the presence chamber, hardwicke hall. it is decorated with classical subjects, such as diana and her nymphs, surrounded with forest trees and foliage. this frieze is ft. in height, modelled in low relief, delicately coloured, and is probably the work of charles williams. with inigo jones ( - ) the purely italian renascence pre- vailed. he was known from - as the designer for the elaborate scenery for the brilliant masques by ben jonson that were performed by the nobles and court of that period. in inigo jones completed the banqueting house, whitehall, the only portion of his great design which was carried out. he also designed the water gate, york house, executed by his favourite carver, nicholas stone, the earlier part of greenwich hospital, and the great room at wilton, with its fine mantelpiece and panelling. nicholas stone was an expert and prolific carver. an extract from his pocket-book is interesting, and throws some light on the cost of sculpture:—" . i made a monument, to be set up at westminster, of mr. francis holies, the youngest son of the earl of clare, for which the sayd earl payed for it sol. my lord of clare also agreed with me for a monument for his brother, sir george holies, the which i made and sett up in the chappell at westminster where sir francis vere lyeth buried, for the which i was payed from the hands of the sayd earl of clare /." the ornament of inigo jones is excellent in proportion, and italian in type. the decoration of the panels and friezes consisted of boldly- designed festoons, masks, and shields. the plaster ceilings have large rectangular, circular, or oval panels, with moulded ribs enriched with arabesques, fruit, or flowers in high relief. the work of wren, which followed, is on similar lines, the propor- tions being good, but the details are less refined in type, being largely under the influence of grinling gibbons and his school. their wonderful technique and lack of restraint in the hands of less able men degenerated into the mannerisms and looseness of style which marked the later th and early th centuries. the era of church building began with sir christopher wren ( - ) in , after the great fire of london, in which old s. paul's, ninety-three parish churches and chapels, the exchange, the guildhall, and fifty of the city companies' halls were destroyed. s. mary-le-bow ( ), s. bride's ( ), s. clement dane ( ), and s. stephen's, walbrook, illustrate some of the typical features of the fifty-one parochial churches that he designed, and his master- piece, s. paul's ( - ), is a noble example of english renas- cence (plan, plate ). wren also built portions of hampton court english renascence. plate . orders by godfrey yke . and greenwich hospital. hawksmoor ( - ), a pupil of wren, built christ church, s. george's-in-the-east ( ), spitalfields church ( ), and s. george's, bloomsbury ( ). castle howard ( )and blenheim palace are by vanbrugh ( - ); s. philip, birmingham ( ), by archer; burlington house ( ) by camp- bell, who also brought out his great work on english architecture, "vitruvius britannicus," vol. i., , vol. ii., , vol. ill., , while vols. iv. and v. were issued by woolfe and gandon in . this book gives introductory descriptions, with plans, elevations, and sections of the chief english buildings erected between - . the horse guards ( ), holkham ( ), and devonshire house ( ) were designed by kent. s. mary-le-strand ( ), s. martin's ( ), the senate house, cambridge ( ), and the radcliffe library ( ) were by gibbs ( - ). with chambers ( - ) the later renascence begins, and somerset house ( ) is a typical example of this period, accurate in proportion, with refined details and excellent workmanship and materials. chambers also published his " treatise of civil architec- ture" in , and "a treatise on the decorative part of civil architecture" in . other architects of this period were george dance, who built the mansion house ( ), and robert and james adam, who designed and built the adelphi ( ) and many streets and mansions in london, bath, edinburgh, and dublin. robert adam also designed many accessories, such as console tables and candelabra, and on the ceilings, pilasters, and panels were classical stucco enrichments (plate ). pergolese, bartolozzi, and angelica kaufmann contri- buted designs and paintings for the brothers adam. of modern renascence, the wellington monument, in s. paul's cathedral, by alfred stevens ( - ), is distinguished by its strong personality and architectonic treatment of composition, and the beauty and singular grace of its details. mahometan ornament. plate . f^elier ow amc.mt frqaa the wekala. cairo ar.abiam capital fnow the coukj the lions ceilimg decoivuiom.fr.o/v\ wall decob-atiorl f .ofa the paim /aor.e que . (owenjqnes persian ornament. plate . ersian ornament. the early art of persia was similar to that of assyria and babylon, having the same forms, mate- rials, and traditions. with the accession of the sassanides, a.d. , came the introduction of the elliptical dome, so typical of eastern architecture. this dome rested on pendentives, which occupied the angles of the square base. these pendentives and the elliptical dome are dis- tinctive features in mahometan architecture. the industrial arts of persia were largely influenced by the tradi- tional arts of assyria and chaldea. this tradition was carried on with rare skill and selective power by the persians, culminating in the splendid period of shah abbas, a.d. - . the vitality, beauty, and interest of detail, combined with perfect decorative adaptation to material, are characteristic of the textiles, pottery, metal work, and illuminated manuscripts of the th, th, and th centuries. the mahometan conquest of persia, a.d. - , by abu bekr, the successor of mohammed, largely influenced the development of the arts of the persians, who adopted the customs and habits of contemporary races, yet preserved all the characteristics of their art; and there is no doubt that the art of the arabs was founded upon the traditional arts of persia. persian decoration is characterised by a fine feeling for form and colour, and for the singularly frank renderings of natural plants, such plate. th 'centura .km- as the pink, hyacinth, tulip, rose, iris, and the pine and date. these are used with perfect sincerity and frankness, and are essentially decorative in treatment, combining harmony of composition of mass, beauty of form, and purity of colour. it was doubtless owing to these qualities, together with the perfect adaptation of ornament to material, that the persian style so largely influenced contemporary work, and especially the european textile fabrics of the th and th centuries. the illustrations given are of some familiar types of persian adaptations of natural flowers, doubtless chosen for their significance, beauty of growth and form, and appropriateness of decorative treatment. purely arabian forms, as given in plate , are frequently associated with the persian floral treatment, showing the influence of the artists of damascus. many fine examples of lustred wall tiles, dating from the th and th centuries, are in the south kensington museum, of which the blue, brown, and turquoise colouring is of a splendid quality. they often have arabic inscrip- tions interspersed with the floral enrichments. examples of wall tiles of the th century have been found in the ruins of rhages. these lustred tiles are a remarkable instance of tradition or heredi- tary proclivity. this art, beginning with the enamelled bricks of babylon, and the later frieze of susa (page ) with its brilliant enamel and fine colour, was continued by the persians, and, passing to the arabs, the tradition was carried to cairo, spain, and majorca; thence into italy, where enamelled lustre ware was made, differing from the original persian in its frequent absence of utility, which was fundamental to the art of the persians. mahometan ornament has five broad divisions, viz., arabian, sicilian, moresque, indian, and persian ; and they are all characterised by strongly-marked compartments or fields, which are filled with finer and more delicate enrichments. these compartments are most pro- nounced in the moresque, with its complex geometric interlacing and entire absence of natural forms (figs. , , , and , plate ). the arabian style is somewhat similar, but less formal. the indian has a conventional rendering of plants, and the introduction of the lion, tiger, and the elephant (fig. , plate ); while in the persian work there is a still less formal constructive arrangement, with floral forms clearly defined in line and mass, and the introduction of the human figure with the horse, the lion, the tiger, and birds. note the illustration in textiles, which is taken from a fine carpet in the south kensington museum. in this carpet, animal forms, chosen with rare selective power and judgment, are combined with the typical floral enrichment of persia, with the wealth of colour, admirable detail of spacing and mass, beauty of incident and vigour, and appropriateness of treatment. these are features that distinguish the industrial designs of persia; and it is doubtless due to the interest and vitality of their ornament that we owe the remarkable influence of persian art upon the contemporary and latter craftsmanship of europe. persian ornament. plate . indian ornament. plate . columm frofa ttcmple of vi ha pmhted cotton dock collf.ctic)m. silk dkocade with pine shaped flowers dcriafvxs . cotton pfmht with flowers i tht fok.m of a leaf . . t\ . /a lss.v^'^ixs^^tisn^ <" /"?iri-> ?riw./.fcci:« cakf with the p of p me ijarj.rt oi^ourtd k. / chinese ornament. plate . wovem silk chime e lav ftocm-oluectlori mar-rar\> of the "wmversitp of 'misconetn text books of ornamental design by lewis f. day. i. the anatomy of pattern. lewis f. day's text books of ornamental design. price three-and-sixpence each, crown vo, bound in cloth. some principles of every-day art: introductory chapters on the arts not f ne. second edition. in great part re-written from 'every-day art,' containing nearly all the original illustrations and some new ones; forming a prefatory volume to the series. the anatomy of pattern. fourth edition and eighth thousand, revised, with cuts and forty-one full-page illustrations, several of them first drawn for this edition. the planning of ornament. third edition and fifth thousand, revised, with forty-one full-page illustrations, many of them re-drawn for this edition. the application of ornament. fourth edition and fifth thousand, revised. with forty-eight full-page illustrations. thick crown vo, cloth gilt. price s. atthird edition and fourth thousand. nature in ornament. with a hundred and twenty-three plates, and a hundred and ninety- two illustrations in the text. descriptive list of plates. . the construction of gothic tracery patterns— showing the square, diamond, hexagon, circular, or other plan on which elaborate tracery is built . the square—checks and other diapers built on cross- lines. . the lattice and the diamond—plaids, zigzags, &c, built on cross-lines. . frets, &c.—showing their construction on a network of cross-lines. . all-over pattern—showing the cross-lines upon which it is planned. . the triangle —diapers of star, hexagon, and lozenge shapes, built up on the lines of the equilateral triangle. . the triangle —diapers composed of the equilateral triangle and its compounds. . the hexagon—honeycomb and other diapers based upon the hexagon and its compound. . diaper —designed on the lines of hexagon or triangle. . the octagon—simple octagon diapers and the lines of their construction. . arab lattice pattern—dissected, and their anatomy laid bare. . curvilinear patterns—showing the construction of the wave, the ogee, the net, &c the anatomy of pattern. pattern; certainly it is impossible to plait, net, knit, weave, or otherwise mechanically make, without producing pattern. it may be infinitesimally small, as in weaving, where the warp and weft are often invisible to the naked eye; but it is there; and all that re- mains for us to do is, to efface it as far as we can, or to make the best of it. out of the determination to make the best of it has grown much of the most beautiful pattern-work. to neglect this source of in- spiration, therefore, to say nothing of the attempt to suppress it, would seem to be wasteful of opportunity to the very last degree. so certainly will the repetition of parts result in some sort of pattern, that one may say, wherever there is ordered repetition there / is pattern. take any form you please, and s repeat it at regular intervals, and you have, whether you want it or no, a pattern, as surely as the recurrence of sounds will pro- 'duce rhythm or cadence. the distribution of the parts need not even be regular. the wave marks on the sand, the veins of marble, the grain of wood, the crystallisation of the breath upon the window- the anatomy of pattern. upon the vertical, horizontal, or diagonal lines, which thus asserted themselves. it was much more likely the result of not working upon definite lines at all. a designer who knew the a b c of his business, would make sure of lines not in themselves offensive; he would counteract a tendency to stripes in one direction by features directing the atten- tion otherwards; and he would so clothe any doubtful line that there would be no fear of its unduly asserting itself, as in its naked- ness it might. he foresees the danger (it is a danger even to the most experienced) and he is fore-armed against it. the mighty man of valour who disdains to be trammelled by principles, or any such encumbrance, is with- out defence against contingencies practically certain to arrive. it is only by a miracle, or a fluke, that he can escape failure. the over- whelming odds are, that the petty considera- tions he has despised will be quite enough to wreck any venture he has dared in defiance of them. since, then, it is practically inevitable that there shall be definite lines in ornamental design—seeing that if you don't arrange for them they arrange themselves—it is the merest introductory, common sense to lay down those lines to begin with, and, in fact, to make them the skeleton or framework upon which you build up your pattern. you will see, when they are laid bare for you, that these skeletons are after all very few. the anatomy of pattern. ii. pattern dissection. repeated pattern may be classified, i said, according to its structure. first in order of obviousness comes the stripe. it comes also very early in order of invention: the loom must from the begin- ning have suggested the stripe-pattern, which practically grows out of it. the stripe, however, carries us only a very short distance in the direction of design. for as soon as you make any break in the re- peated line, the recurrence of that break gives other lines in the cross direction. suppose a series of horizontal bands broken at equal intervals by a series of rosettes. it is clear, that if the rosettes fall one under the other, they give upright lines; or if they are shifted you get diagonal cross lines. if the line itself is broken, as in the case of a series of waved lines, or, still more plainly, in a pattern dissection. series of vandykes, the turn of the wave, or the point of the zigzag, when it is repeated, gives the cross line just the same. and so we come at once to the vast order of patterns constructed upon cross lines. this is probably quite the first in point of time, arising as it inevitably does out of the very primitive art of plaiting. you have only to interweave strips of two different colours, and you get at once a check, or what is familiar to us in black and white as the chess-board pattern. (plate .) suppose the interwoven strips to be all of one colour, then the lines of intersection would make a lattice or basket-work pattern. the simplest form of check or lattice is when the crossing is at equal intervals and at right angles. vary the interval, and you have all manner of plaids and tartans. alter your point of view (or turn the design degrees round) and you get the diamond. the difference in point of view makes no real difference in plan: a stripe may take any direction, yet it is always a stripe. but if we alter the angle at which the lines cross, we get not only a fresh variety of shapes, but we may obtain also a diamond pattern dissection. ii to the pattern, but to its translation into a textile fabric. if instead of the chess-board we take the lines of the lattice, and work upon them, we get, without departing from those lines (only intermitting them) a wonderful range of inter- lacements and the like; some of them of ex- ceeding intricacy, as in the case of the "fret" a number of these are shown on plate . there seems no limit to the ever-increasing range of pattern-work thus disclosed, all built upon the same constructional scaffolding. from the intermission of the lines results a dnd of spot pattern, more or less free, which : might be mistaken for a distinct order of de- ! >ign (plates and ). but it is only a variety. in a certain sense it matters little whether [a design is constructed on geometric lines, or only arranged so that it falls within them. i the skeleton, when you come to dissect the two, is the same in either case. our theory of iconstruction, therefore, applies quite as much to sprigs, spots, and all so-called free patterns, us to those in which the constructional lines actually occur as lines. you have not done away with construction when you have suc- ceeded in keeping the scaffolding out of i a^lcb ▲ fffftftfirl the anatomy of pattern. another new shape is evolved. returning once again to the square lattice, if we cross it diagonally both ways, cross it by itself, that is, so that each square is cut up into four, we get out of those lines the octagon (plate ); but not an equal-sided octagon; that is, built on a cross lattice of different proportions. the octagon, however, is not a unit which will of itself form a diaper, as the hexagon will. it is only in connection with a square, diamond, or other four-sided figure, that it will "repeat." place side by side a series of octagons, and there will appear four-sided gaps between (plate ). nevertheless, this new series of lines gives us new varieties of radi- ated pattern: witness once more the elaborate interlacings of the arabs; all of which, even the most magnificent, are closely related to the pattern so familiar in the, seat of a common cane-bottomed chair. it is possible to carry the principle of radia- tion further still. you may, for example, cross this more elaborate lattice by a lattice like itself; but you get by that means rather intricacy than variety—especially when the intersecting lines are in part interrupted. in pattern dissection. certain arab patterns, where this ultra-elabora- tion of lines is employed, it appears almost as if a new principle had been introduced (plate ); but, upon analysis, the designs resolve themselves into the elements with which we have already had to deal—so few are the plans upon which pattern is con- structed. already we have come to the end of the straight-lined family. why, it may be asked, can you not make a diaper on other lines, on the lines of the pentagon for ex- ample? well, you may put together so many penta- gons—and a very respectable diaper they form—espe- cially if you fur- ther enrich the pentagons with five-pointed stars. not long since i came upon just such a diaper, which, for a moment, promised to upset all my neatly arranged theories on the subject of pattern anatomy. however, pentagon diaper and its skeleton. fpl&te . the anatomy of pattern. figures (plate ), very nearly approaching the straight-lined hexagon. in this way the straight-lined series might be derived from the curved (compare plates and ); and so once more, by a very different road, we reach always, in this maze of pattern- work, the same point, which is, the limited variety of skeleton on which pattern is built. from the combination of straight lines with curved (plates and ) result all manner of new diaper forms; which, however, present nothing very new in the way of skeleton. you might start a scroll pattern, such as that given in plate (a type common in the sixteenth and seven- teenth centuries), on the lines either of the hexagon or of the ogee, or of a mixture of curved and straight lines which i may call the broken ogee; and in the end it would not be very clear which of them you had taken for a groundwork; or even whether you had not founded your design upon the diamond—such close kindred do those various skeletons betray. i have dwelt at some length upon rudi- mentary diaper forms, for reasons quite apart the anatomy of pattern. by the conditions of his work, are, in most instances, not just those which beauty would have decreed. they prove, however, to be identical with the lines already shown to be the basis of all recurring pattern-work; and so we begin to see that, had there been no such thing as pattern design before, and no traditional forms of design for us to follow, those very forms must have been evolved as certainly out of the more complex conditions of modern manufacture as they were out of the simple contrivances of primitive handicraft. that is to say, that the lines first given to us by the primary processes of netting, plaiting, and so on, would equally have been prescribed by the printing roller or the power loom. it is one of the most interesting points in the analysis of pattern design to see how regularly we work round, again and again, to identically the same shapes. you cannot safely dogmatise as to the origin of this or that pattern; there are always so many ways in which it might have been suggested. put side by side a series of waved lines so that their curves are opposed (plate ) and the effect is exactly the same as though you had opened pattern dissection. out an ogee diaper; you can deduce either pattern from the other. or, again (same plate), if the ogees interlace, it is impossible to say whether this was the outcome of the ogee, or of waved lines, or simply of the pro- cess of netting. on plate are shown six different ways in which one and the same simple star pattern may be arrived at. . by the juxtaposition of stars and the addition of cross-lines. . by the juxtaposition of diamonds and the addition of cross-lines. . by the juxtaposition of right-angled diamonds, each occupied by a star. . by the interlacing of two series of octagons, and the addition of cross-lines. . by the crossing of two series of zigzag lines, and the addition of cross-lines. . by the crossing of two series of diamonds or lozenges, and the addition of cross-lines. and this does not by any means exhaust the number of ways in which the same result might have been reached. to take another instance, of a very dif- ferent kind, you know how common it is to see a waved line with leaves alternating on the anatomy of pattern. each side of it. this appears on the face of it, a quite mechanical and arbitrary arrangement; but you have only to note how, in nature, the alternate leaves on a slender stem pull it out of the straight, to see the natural and inevitable origin of the idea. by merely ex- aggerating the slight wave of the natural stem, you get one of the most conventional of ornamental border patterns.' so it would seem that, whether you begin with mechanical construction or with nature it works round to the same thing in the end—in the hands of an ornamentist. * see 'nature in ornament,' pp. , . ^plate "photc-tiht" fcjr j.ak«mau. ,qi»«n sipimx the anatomy of pattern. and though the printer make use of the roller' instead of the block, the conditions of design remain unaltered; for the roller is, for all practical purposes of design, only a block bent round in the shape of a cylinder. the square plan of the printed curtain design on plate was prescribed by the roller, which was inches wide and the same in circum- ference. even the bookbinder of earlier days, who was comparatively free to do what he liked in the way of "tooling," was led, whether by instinct or by his tools, to adopt a rectangular repeat, as in plate ; in which also is exemplified what may be done in the way of reversing, and again reversing, the unit of design—so as with comparatively little drawing to produce the effect of an extensive pattern. we have, ordinarily, to reconsider the pos- sible lines of pattern construction in their rela- tion to the rectangular figure,—that being the repeat determined for us by the conditions of nearly all modern manufacture. the base of our operations is, then, usually a parallelogram. furthermore, this parallelogram is in all flate . practical pattern planning. cases restricted in size, and in most cases of more or less arbitrary proportions. for example—in the case of wall-paper printing, it is practically determined for us that the printer's block shall be rectangular. custom has further fixed its width at inches. and, since a block of greater length than that would be unwieldy, we are restricted to a square of inches by inches. the block may represent a fraction only of the design, which can theoretically be made up of as many blocks as you please. but in practice the expense of such a pro- ceeding would make the paper-hangings cost more than paper-hangings are ordinarily worth; and, apart from commercial consider- ations, which would be enough to prevent that kind of extravagance, it is contrary to craftsmanship so to misapply labour. the most capable artist is he who can apply his art to most purpose, and get full value out of his materials. as a matter of fact, the wall-paper designer has to content himself, then, except in very few instances, with a repeat of at most inches square. within those limits he is comparatively the anatomy of pattern. free; but, as i have already shown, do what he may, his repeated pattern will fall into geometric lines, if only those of the parallelo- gram on which it is built. a pattern, such as a, on plate , may seem at first sight to conform to no conditions of restraint; but the actual lines of the repeat reveal them- selves, on closer inspection, in any single feature whose recurrence is to be traced. it is based, you will find, upon the parallelogram —faintly indicated by dotted lines upon the black ground. apart from the conditions of actual manu- facture, it is found commercially expedient to adopt certain fixed dimensions for the tile, block, roller, or whatever it may be—and we are thus constrained to design tiles (if they are to be of any use) on the usual three-, six-, eight-inch or other accepted scale; textiles to a width fixed by the loom, and a length controlled by the consideration of economy; block-printed fabrics under very similar con- ditions; and roller-printed to a length as well as a width prescribed. the proportion of the parallelogram within which our design must be confined varies, that is to say, with the manufacture for which we are designing. an practical pattern planning. experienced designer could often tell, from its proportion and scale alone, for what par- ticular manufacture a design was made. and it is in the impracticability of his ideas that the novice most infallibly betrays his lack of experience. the production of such a pattern as that on plate in the form of a wall-paper inches wide, would involve the (prohibitive) cost of four sets of blocks. whereas to the weaver it would not prove comparatively very costly: as a matter of fact patterns of that relative length occur quite frequently in textiles. in the width of the sicilian silk, on plate , dogs, lions, and eagles follow one another closely in a row; but in the length of the material each is separated from its like by the other two. the pattern repeats on the lines of a long upright parallelogram; but obvi- ously it was designed on the cross lines shown. there is no occasion to enter more fully into all the various technical reasons for the limitations to which the designer is subject. the practical convenience of them, however, is patent. it is as desirable that the architect, for example, should know what sized tiles may be available, as that he should be able the anatomy of pattern. to reckon upon the "bond " of his brickwork; and it is equally clear that without some uni- formity in the width of materials (such as silks, velvets, carpets, chintzes, and so on), it would be difficult to estimate, off-hand, the relative cost of each. the upshot of it is, that the designer has habitually to shape his design according to a rectangular plan, and that of limited, if not fixed, dimensions. it becomes, then, a very serious question with him how far he can avail himself of any other basis. the student might with advantage set himself to tabulate the possibilities in the way of adapting the various units of repeat to repetition, within the square. it would then be seen that, though all things are possible, there are schemes the artist would like to adopt, which, in order to be brought into the repeat permitted, would need to be worked out upon so small a scale as to become quite too insignificant for use. one instance of this it may be worth while to give. suppose a square block of inches, and you wish to adapt a hexagonal design to the anatomy of pattern. duced to half that size; that is to say, there would have to be seven hexagons to the width, measuring each only three inches across. try to arrange a pattern such as that on plate to accommodate itself to a rectangular block of given dimensions, and you will realise how inevitably it is born of the hexagon or the triangle, and cannot be made to fit into arbitrary square lines. it will be seen how very strictly the artist is bound by considerations which scarcely occur to the uninitiated, considera- tions which have always had a great deal to do with the design of pattern-work. fashion has had her say in the matter, too, no doubt—it is a wicked way she has; but, though certain lines have been generally adopted at certain periods and in certain countries, i think it will invariably be found that there was some technical or prac- tical reason for their adoption in the first instance. out of the conditions of weaving came, for example, the adoption of upright patterns, such as that on plate (from a coarse woollen fabric of the fifteenth century) and cross colouring such as occurs in byzantine, plate . practical pattern planning. sicilian, and early italian silks (plate ).* out of weaving comes also the turning over of the design on the two sides of an upright stem, or purely imaginary central line; as in plates , , and many others. in plate may further be seen what great influence material may exercise upon pattern. there was a whole class of pat- terns of this kind schemed in the th and th centuries, with the obvious purpose of disturbing as little as possible of the rich pile of the velvet for which they were designed. when it is realised that the turning over of the pattern is essentially a weaver's device, it will be obvious that in a pattern similarly planned for printing there is no occasion for such rigid symmetry of the two sides; and that, on the contrary, it is desirable rather to introduce a certain amount of variation in the pattern. that is shown in plate , where, though the main lines take the formal ogee shape, the termination of the branches is not alike on both sides. * see also 'the application of ornament,' plate . d the '' drop" pattern. piece of the stuff will fit on to the left of another, and so on. but it is clear that the design may be so contrived that each succeeding breadth has to be dropped in the hanging. if this drop were only very slight—say three inches—it would take seven breadths, in a pattern of inches deep, before a given feature in the design occurred again exactly on the same level. there would be no dan- ger then of any horizontal tendency in the marked lines which recurring features of the design might take, but, on the other hand, great likelihood of a diagonal line developing itself, with even more unfortunate effect. the design would seem, rather, to step down- wards; and the shorter the steps, the more noticeable would be the line such features might take. this difficulty is avoided if you make the "drop" just one-half the depth of the pattern, so that every alternate strip is hung on the same level. then the diagonal lines correct themselves. if any line at all asserts itself, it is more likely a zigzag (instead of a step), which, in connection with corre- sponding zigzags above and below, may very possibly form a trellis or lozenge pattern. d the anatomy of pattern. there is good reason, therefore, for saying the diamond is a useful plan to work on; for upon it is formed the safest variety of drop pattern—that, namely, which drops one-half its depth. instances of drop patterns are given in plates , (b), , , and others. one has heard persons, more familiar with the forms of ornament than expert in prac- tical design, complain of the difficulty they experience in scheming a "drop." if they would only think of the problem as the filling of a diamond shape, it would come very easily to them. the diamond is, in fact, only a square turned part way round. that part of your design which extends beyond the margin a b must occur again within the margin c d; that which extends beyond the margin c a ma. akarjnm. london .w.c. i v. skeleton plans. the designer finds it ordinarily more con- venient to design at once upon the lines of the diamond, because their simplicity enables him better to keep in view the effect of his pattern in its repeated form than any other lines on which the "drop" can be worked. even though one may have no intention of taking advantage of the full width of a block, it may still be found convenient to design within the diamond, if only in order to economise design: and, mind you, economy is an absolute necessity of the case. but for economic reasons there would be no weaving, printing, stamping, and so on; we should confine ourselves to embroidery, tapestry, painting, and other work of our own hands. assume, for the purpose of explanation, that it is a wall-paper you want to design. if you begin by dividing the width of inches into two, and make your pattern a "drop," inches long by rob wide, as at a (plate *photo-tiht" by jan* 'l alc«nn an. london w c. ç; САР‘ alsqÈl i „ '>- i. u d* /" _“ и ъ v „‘-. ' ' ‚ддЁОКАто ` explanation and instvations. НЕ opposite page illustrates one of our modern lonic capitals with necking, Т “empire," as applied to a column showing the wood shaft and core running through the capital supporting the entablature above. the plans of the differ- ent abacus forms as given will serve as a further illustration of the relative position of shaft and our material. all our capitals are furnished as shown in the catalogue, each capital having a complete finish to connect with shaft. the diameter given in catalogue represents the top of column. the width represents the top of pilaster. the height given is the exact height of capital. always allow a trifle more height for your core, so the weight will resti on shaft, and not on capital-yá of an inch up to a io-iiich diameter, И of an inch above that size, will be sufficient to insure a safe application. the thickness of our material is i inch up to a io-inch diameter capital, making the core of a io-iiich diameter capital inches; of an -inch capital, inches. above io inches allow уз of an inch more for the thickness of material for every inches of increased size, making core for a i ­inch diameter capital „И inches; a ió-inch capital, паи inches, etc. in ordering capitals, give name, number, and size of diameter of width. also state material wanted, viz.: exterior composition, warranted to stand in any climate. interior composition, made with grain to match any wood, having a solid wood body, requires no core on column. always state the kind of wood and finish. fibrous plaster used in conjunction with interior plaster finish. the sizes of our brackets given are: i. the entire width across abacus moulding. . width of face on body without moulding. drop or length. . projection. we are constantly adding new sizes to our stock, and will make any sizes desired not listed, upon special request, and also`carry a number of odd styles and sizes of capitals and brackets, designs of which will be sent on application. special designs submitted will receive correct and careful execution. в the decorators svi-’pix Со. ',.‚._ ‚ . ,n . . т _ ŕ _-._ . вычетов-дарите »í -jl'ut ì' c w .. . сап—ПА- | (Читы. ‚,„ ч | l i f __ _ ч cement and exterior bases are cast hollow to allow for wood core on column. c _., ­ e ~;.­. make core inches less than diameter of column. <%_:_Ё f» q_-;ŕ Г _j | this applies to pilaster bases also. `-\___›‚Ч :mw-awww ‘it-« pilaster bases full square or over half are saine price _ i c____-___. _ Г .ju-¿t _d ­ as corresponding column bases. -—————————) в Г”"’ ` % î Ё Г*————_—_ ,i '..- .squl нити __.. i». _ pwr/arf. l--llrfn' __. i. _ Нитки-в плати __. cohwtÍw dohic iof`ilc` cou/mn. corinthian bash. ШьАзтвк. sizes same as for column. ­ prices for buse return or less. nvib diam. height dram.of sqvare diameter port. nvab port. ber ofshapt cnfbase cor.cap. члхтн АТ \ ЕХТЕКПЭК cement rer extermnq cement inches inches íinches inches inches. .- $ . $ . $ . “ “ “ ” }{ “ . . . . “ “ , “ “ до “ . . . . i: i: “ " “ . . . . “ i “ s :i l “ i :‘ . . . . - u @ Н ” ‘ . . . . “ “ “ }; “ " . . i-Ós - ‘t “ “ “ . . . . “ “ “ á “ . . . ” " ” “ ” . . . . ” Ь “ " ” ” . . . ï ” ” “ " . . . . u о}? к ” ” " . . . . “ “ ” ‘{ “ . . . . “ “ “ “ . . . . “ ißlí “ “ “ “ . . . . ‘a “ “ ” “ . . . . И и h ” “ . . . . colvifin. Вошь ВАЬЬ. pilaster. sizes same as for column. prices for base ‘if return ' less. nvm- iham. thhght uam.of sqvare nameter port. nvm- port. ber (Л shaft of base cor.cap. hjnth Ат х Ехтнкпп‹ cement eer extermnt cement inches íinches inches. inches. §§inchcs. $ . $ . $ . . “ “ " “ g “ . . . . :‘ “ “ “ “ . . . . ‘i :t :‘ “ i “ . . . . и ‘ ” “ . . . . Н @ к ï y ” . . . . И Ц u Ä x до . . . “ ‘t “ l “ “ . . . . u ‘ i . . . ‘ “ }; ” “ . . . . “ ” “ ” “ . . . . “ g “ “ “ “ . . . “ ” “ ” ” ‚ . . colvmn. iomc base. pilaster. sizes saine. as for column. prices for base Га return or less. nvm- ХЛАМ. гипспт ГЛАМ.ОР sqvare inameter port nvm- port ber (mfshapt ofbase cor.cap. члхтн АТ А ЕХТЕККП< cement ber extermh< cement inches inches inches inches §íinches. . $ . . $ . ” ” ” ” ” . . . . ” ” ‘ ” ” “ . . . . :‘ “ " ” " . . . . ¿ x х к x . . . . ‘ . . . . . : / i. j: }; “ l ‘i . . . . “ “ t i: . . . . ß ‘ ‘ . . . . ” }{ ” ” ” ” . . . . ” ” ” " ” . . . " ” ” ” ‘ “ . . . . х х г i ” . . . . Н n Á И x . . . Н . . . . ” “ ” “ . . . . ” ” ” " “ o . . . “ " '° { " “ . . . . “ " “ “ “ . . . . ” “ ” ” ” . . . . " ” “ “ “ . ` “ " “ “ " . . в t НЕ decoratoizs svpply co. colvmn. exterior. ln'i`erl()r no. diameter. hil/ . priei-:s (fur natvral wood finish) incńies. ¿ incńies. $ . crudi. м }; " “ . “ no. diameter. height. prices. “ j§ ” , “ inches. âíinches. $ . each. a } т ” . ” ' ' âa :‘ - и ‘ % " .~o “ . ' .mé ' ` . a % “ . ’ “ , . “ “ “ ss@ “ “ x " . ” `° }í “ . П a НЕ " % " . “ “: " " - “ s “ “ . " б " sh “ - “ a } “ § “ . “ “ ïx “ . “ (i о “ " . “ " Ó“ u “' и ‘i ojá “ . ” a ‘ :i s " . ” .t .. . Н . к l “ ‘l . Н o a sl» l, . a " 'ж " "о ” s a “ ‘ “ - Н “ }; ‘ ” “ nfs " . ” a " ¿§ " " " “ . ” " ‘ " ” i; " “ ” “ “ ” И a " " . ” " д “ “ . " - . “ }; “ . ” zove‘pńcesluuœd on oak orlnrch. .xny'other oods c] `° ‘ “ . " extra. _ pilas'riir. f hÄlhrior. ln'l hrior. Ão' u th’ НЕЁСНТ' prices (шк ХАТУКАЬ woon finisii.) ip inches. §ginches. $ . each. v ‚ ,ap }§ ” Н ,_ ‘­ Ärn “inth. lisunrl lhucßs “ “ _ ; Н p inches. §í nches s „u>each. др i: l :i и; ‘î ’ И _¿ u - u ‘ p m . ‘ f" Ц ° n - п a? Ó}§ " f “ . " p ' i. l t“ ~ u p " ц " . ” ЭПР Ч / “ } “ «Óo Н ap . }; ” ” . “ p д]: . “ p " “ . “ sip Ó l " sÈÍ “ - ‘l ap sßí “ “ _ ; “ p ’ ‘i âïs ‘i . “ m» i “ si “ . ;@ “ . ' ‘ s ‘ - “ p id “ }: '° . ” ssap “ ‘l Ó-oo n sp i “ “ . ” p " “ Ó-Óo п op '| " " . ” ^Р jl “ ; “ ' h _ qap big “ ' à " . ” ЗЗР “ “ . h p » " i ¿{ “ . ” р " oßä l. q­Öo u ioap i “ }; " . “ iip “ Á " . “ p “ ‘« " . ” p n’ “ iólí “ . ” p " " . “ ap “ " . ” iqp “ “ . ” р “ ; ” oo ” :above prhxs based on oak orlńrch. y' thertvoods } p " '; “ . ” extra. . state return or thickness of pilaster. " d f ` (meek anta;.­­i>ii-asiei<. ex'i erior. leriarlor. no. yvhhwl ileunnz lhucßs ' (ron natvral woon fhhshj inches. inchcs. $ . each. :yo \yidth­ iieight- prices. }¿ ” ! ” . “ inches. inches. $ . each. ­ Н - “ Н _» ` ’ “ i/ Н Н s u s к „ - Н мг u : , „ - u g ‘i ij) i‘ , Н п “ î/ß “ . Н “ ,/ t. . ? И (Ч Í, ‘t il, “ . Н ) a () ‹ . ho д . t . и .gf И u . “ },° ” x ‘ . s “ °' . ” ' “ “ _ @ ” п :: : :: :i аз i: ‘f :: i: Н и . и Ц */ Н - „ sqa . :‘ Юн - б - " o " . “ " . по “ ,’ ’ “ . " ‘д “ iofx " . ” х !‘ “ “ . ” “ §Í “ . ” " " . “ " °` . ” “ " . ” ;\Ьоге ргпкж based on oak ortńrch. y ther ds “ " . " extnl state return or thickness of pilaster. Авох'в prices svbject то discovnt. all capitals and brackets listed under the headingr exterior can also be furnished for interior plaster finish at saine price. t n¿i)ecorators svpplv c greek ionr; erechthevm colvmn. " , , i * . -»u wll¢|\¢' ~\"' . ‘$ . ’ h- г; "Ёж ,à _ i. {in} ’ _-‘u k* eulaster' fj: А. „¿f§/f`ì ` а: . ‘,.vxv'twvï ` ‘ i. i i:\ůsl­\ŕlynâ\h\m\­i- ,i "`. ‘u’ мЦ”ё›д greek antal ihlaster. either of the above two pilaster caps can be used with the column Сар. instrvctions and explanation page . io the decorators svpply co. ` y com mn. ` y ` ч ‹ y’ ч à г— rai ilrior. ii\ i ilrior. Минная. diameter. height. prices. (fdr natvrai. woon finish.) cies. «§ n es. >i . eat-l . '. f . a. с : . : g . ‘ . n nl l l s ` l \ lr di \iit ~r h ht prilfs ian }í “ ¢ ” . " n inches. }§ nches. $ . eaph. ‘c lt ‘l / ll ‘ ‚‘ Ó \ n ‘ . n @ m . an п м н n п и . и ~ и tiri н _ и „ ia/ м alli-'_ Н и n Ó h -on n , - Ю - an " mm “ . " n “ " . " ‘\ it l О _.' ‘l _ ‘l n / § ._ ‘ n & ‘ h@ . ‘ ‘i ‘l ll il Ч l( С an b@ u . n . '_ v «t _' l; _ an ' / и А. "f н ‘l n l ‘t '@ ‘t . n p; . ,lq ‘ . п san % f я . ” n - u / ‘ ’ «s ’ и и Ón ‘l tl il , / lí ‘ ‘l ¿n “ ‘l h ‘n д " . o “ an f " »i' ." it l / «t ‘\ / n ‘l З as n §§ . n o . an i “ “ . ” n " / “ .­o ” q v l и sn/ st n it э n as . ioan “ ‘{ “ . “ n “ “ . “ n “ “ . ” n “ °‘ . ” n o “ i §§ “ . ” an “ g “ . ” n “ “ . ” n “ ‘i’ “ . “ above prices based on oak or birch. any other woods % n o “ )/ “ . " extra. ` yr \ t' itÄ i erior. interior. nvmher. “Читы. height. prices. (por natvrai. woon finish.) ipn inches. % inches. . each. nvmher width. height. prices. iapn §á “ bń “ . ” pn inches. ìí nches. $ . each. pn “ / “ . " pn lf “ ' . " “ , si и / и _ н ‚ , и ilu/ì’ п ì н . m. sÁ , . m` f . pn “ " . “ pn }; “ Чд ” . ” .mw % “ з'ё " . “ горы “ ‘s " ­ и px Н и l с: зорх h н и ^pn -’ / И s ” . " m' " ” `%. u spn ” ' , “ . “ зги . " sîìâ ” . “ ‘l l\ (t «t (l in ` , l п l и .. ` ` y н а f и _ _ п Ópa o . дыры }; . ‘s ‘t ‘l ‘a п ъ px ii н _’ и . _ и q %/ п :/ в: о и pn, н / и à и дёрч ‘ н н Ó п А \, a н ¿ig/ п п e) f q п . / и п oap. д i . о in „e . h (l tl ioapn i: gli °‘ . " iipn oßg “ . Н i pn “ ioßá “ . ” pn " “ . “ i pn o “ izëá “ . ” apn “ ;@ “ . " iqpn " " . “ . . ipn и iÓ ’ и _ o и above prices based oak or birch. any other woods % pn “ }{ “ . ” ЁХЁПЪ state return or thickness of pilaster. creer ani.»fh,-pilaster. exterior. in ierior. nvmber. width. height. prices. (for natvrai. wooo finish.) n s mches- , lnchcs- $ . each. Хитин. width. height. prices. n } “ hìô “ .so “ n inches. ihginches. $ . each. n Ó и '/ Н ‚(о u n i/ h i ,-/ Н . Н , н ás н ) и / и н п Ь . n i/ß . n н и - и n н и . и n у}; “ уё “ . “ n “ iâ( " . ” io н м . м n sl/é/ н :%‹% и . и n “ “ . ” n Ó " zßá “ . ” Х “ kg “ . “ n ófí " li “ . ” (an i“ “ i “ . ” n ­ “ ” “ . ” .. И .. ä g .. .gw .g .. .. ¿o .. ‘ . ( a k ' n ( ч Ó п / п а н ‚ п gl? п п ) . i n _ . ; ‘ . ‘ ,Ä io b .so ian i ` . ‘ n " “ . ” n o “ “ . ” n " sii “ . ” n “ }; " . ” iove prùxß based on oak orlmrch. . }'other oods @ ll (l n ii . " extra. state return or thickness of pilaster. above prices svbject to discovnt. all capitals and brackets listed under the head of exterior can also he furnished for interior plaster ñnish at same price. rl`iie decorators svpply c . greek ionic. erechthevm. . _ wir’ y ‚ « " о ­­ А r . rar' ч r "- :и — " Ч? — «vv *'f ‘ *_ ' ' f " /l ' \ v y . _ . ‘v .. ` ‘r ‘ \ — _ ‚ . —’ i \ мы» ‘fà ‚ ‘l l’ ’ .. ~ y . . er* _ \ "l А “- в colvmn. . l r " / l n y .` ` ‘ Дамттёпм‘й“ -- i, .i pilaster. greek ante " “ “f 'mc-ui“ ‘ i" ia ­ »il ’ ' d pilasters. either of the above two pilaster caps can be used with column caps. instvarions and explanation page . t e decorators svpplv С . apollo i) >\«’.\ .»vs. coinmn. l'- .\ii rior. intilrior. nvmber. imameter. thmont. lüuces (nuzxsrvral~woodiunnul) inches. c inches. ` . each. Мишки. diameter. iieigiit. prices. ' С‘ h' . . u — inches. § nches. s . c>each. u / и _ _, u d ,. Ó “ _ “ .‹ _ u u ‚‚ ‚‚ Í . s “ “ “ ’- ь‘ / (б _ _ “ h' А lo Í до § “ . “ “ “ . “ :xbove {nices innuxi on (udc or inick. ;\пу other wooiis, ,? extra. ’ ..-\s' ‘ «;r. iiÄterior. interior. iÑvmber. \vidth. phnght. ihuces. (for natvr^l`w d fuushÖ Ó inches_ дтсЬез. . о(%идъ Г\гхп‹нк. \idtil tienìut. Íprices. “ “ . “ . inches §§inches. . each. u / u ,_ a ,__ ь; u _, ц . „ Ó - n( i и . и n' % и . и “ i “ “ “ “ oo “ “ ' " “ ­. “ . . д// \Ь че prmes based on oak or inrch. ; y other ivoods % extra. Литвы stator. (Íoinmn. pilaster. ­ exterior. exterior. nvmber. ihnmeter. phngut. prmes. nvmber. \vnnur thmght. prmhh. inches. íinches. . nud ioinches. íinches. s .cœ>each. “ “ . “ _ “ “ . “ ' “ “ . “ “ “ . “ “ ( “ . “ “ “ . “ state return or thickness of pilaster. .\bove ihuces svbject to ihscovnt. all capitals and brackets listed under the heading exterior can also be furnished for interior plaster finish at same price. i Íiheidecorators svpply co. colvmn. exterior. interior. nvmber. diameter. height. prices. (for natvral wood finish) inches, , / / inches, , @ach nvmber. diameter. height. prices. a % “ iâ “ i . “ % inches. ‘ inch. . each. “ % “ . “ “ % inches. . “ a % “ % “ . “ % “ “ . “ “ , / “ . “ “ iffg “ . “ % “ “ . “ % “ ; “ . “ “ И; ‘i i n i “ И “ . “ “ % “ . “ % “ “ , “ “ " . “ “ % “ . “ % “ % . % “ i; - “ “ ё=ё “ - % “ . оо “ % “ “ . “ “ ’ ,/ “ , “ “ % “ . “ % “ % " . “ “ % “ . “ “ “ . “ “ % “ . “ “ % “ . “ “ % “ . “ io “ % “ . “ “ ` “ . “ a “ “ . “ “ % “ . “ “ e/g “ . “ “ “ . “ above prices based on oak or birch. any other woods % extra. ihlaster. 'exterior interior. nvmber. width. heigiit. prices. (for nati'ral wood finisii) тема % inches_ $ each. ni'miier. width. height. prices. А % “ ( ) “ i _oo “ % inches. Н inch. so . each. “ % “ i ° is “ “ % inches. . “ a % “ % “ . “ % "i “ i-oo “ “ “ . “ “ “ - “ % “ “ . “ . % “ и l a “ , “ . “ “ % “ i » u % “ % “ ­ s “ % " ’­’ iii “ i ­ “ “ “ . “ u .kÃ/ “ i ­ “ % “ % “ . “ % “ % “ . a “ , / ; “ . “ “ % “ . “ % “ “ . “ “i ‘if/ u - a “ % “ . “ / “ ‘if/Í “ - io “ “ ?/ “ . " “ и “ - a “ “ . “ q “ u - и i и % “ . и то “ , “ . о “ “ / “ . “ a “ “ . “ “ }{ “ . “ _ . и ,á a . и ao\'e cprices based on oak or birch. any other “ u . o u woods o ,fc extra. state return or thickness of lpilaster. above prices svbject to discovx'r. .\ capitals and brackets listed under the heading exterior can also be furnished for interior plaster finish at saine price. ТНЕ ВЕСОКАТОКБ svpply Со. i colvmn. Сорушснтвв nv Тнп Ввсокм'ояз svrply Со. greek angvlar ionlc. minerva polias. Сопкюнтвп by Тнв dbconm-oks svpply cn, pilaster. ixstvatons and explanation page . the decorators Биты co. y coin m a. exterior. interior. nvmber. diameter. height. prices. (for natvral wood finish.) mîhes' meuheb' °°° eŕffh' nvmber. diameter. height. prices. a }á éí . . . _ a „ i. „o a inch. nches . oeach. ` § a ê a ¿o a iliinches. “ . “ “ “ . “ " “ s " / с; / .. .. lá " “ . “ a- & ql - o ' „ .. . .. y ‘‚/ ‘s _ h' ` ' . d ° / ¿u / »s и А и }: в. «s ,!/ . a i r . „ yí j . ° y i Ъ. l_/ ‘ и / t Ó ‘t q - t. А А ,-- . _’ .. „' д _o .. “ i “ . ” ssÍ ,/ „ / „ " o() io c. . . i.' â i [ , с i .oo _ a „ f „ ‚ _ и ; " ‘ . " "l _ is n ¿t i» u .a h ‘ в п _', . - _ “ ‘ . в i i/ м ’o и l .f “ Ь “ . „ } . ‚ о „ is и i.' . ; .i io i . iÓ и a o „ oo “ ` “ . “ и “ ¿s . .a “ §{ “ . “ (i ¿i o “ “ . “ above prices based on oak or birch. any other woods %i extra. exterior. interior. nvmber. width. height. prices. (for natvral wood finish.) ШЁЁЮЕ“ meines' si ' eadl' nvmber. width. height. prices. А - " . .,. a и }/ и i „o a inch. nginches. si.u each. и а i ¿o a ikáinches. “ . “ ' ‚_(" n Í h' - t» a a u . i. , i h /, ‘ . u и q и . „ , / »g . a ` u _ . u ` . i ч ° a i ' в. ;/ i.' ` с. — " % “ о - “ ‘ l - Э * ' Э (g u _y в. ч _ c. a lí “ ­ illí “ . " ‘“ ‘ д i . "д ‘ и i a . a î §á § . n ‘l _ s ‚_ s l „o ь l .i и « « зч э и __ з и h ¿t u д ад n чдб “ h . a i /" ` i ' . ‘ / “ ‘ Ó о ‘s (ь ь ‚’ a . О т ёв . _ i 'i/ „ Ó „ ii ¿i iïsá a . и А l l io/-g .oo “ }( “ . “ Ё “ / ü b-sn “ и ‘ _ . i. o ‘ :y ‘ . ‘ i a и и . ' Ы и “ is и a io_ a . И / ( ` ` ‘Ь l . “ “ . “ ‘ “ ( ¿á o . .a “ ( “ . “ q , и ‚_, . О (i § o “ î // “ . “ ‘ “ l( ¿i above prices based on oak or birch. any other woods %l extra. state return or thickness of pilaster. above prices svbject to discovnt. all capitals and brackets listed under the headingr exterior can also be furnished for interior plaster finish at same price. lìniijecorators svp?ly СО. state. return or thickness f pilaster. exterior. СОЦ’МХ. interior. nvmber. diameter. height. prices. (for nan-ral wood finish.) . i/ . А ЁИ meres' ” “ ?“ nvii-iber. diameter. height. prices. и % и i до и inches. / inch. ` $ . eauch. a % и % и _ и i “i rfi-È inches. . к “ “ . “ / u i?? u - о “ a “ “ . “ c@ / „ a ' и „ и и “ }q . l % ­ y s . f) к и и a и « t и i. i u ­­ / “ . so “ u , и _o и , (‚% А % “ % “ “ . Ó % Ó'oo ц a / и „ Ь . .»" ' so ,_ м l u _ и u _ / «a l . io d;~ ' _ io i. „ g u и “ , “ . " ’ / ° “ “ . “ о “ “ . “ А “ “ . “ “ % “ . “ “ g “ . “ “ “ . “ “ “ . “ ‘ “ % “ . “ al'iove prices liiisetl n oak т . any other “ “ . “ “ТКмЪ С% ехгпъ exterior. РПАЬТЬК- interior. nvmber. width. height. prices. nymiier. width. height. prices. ? inches. ,’/ inches. . each ? inches. i inch si . each. a? }á “ §§ “ . " ? “ iîáinches. . “ ? “ §§ “ . “ ? }§ ” / “ . “ ООАР % “ /{ “ . “ ? “ / “ . “ ? h “ . ” ? " “ . ” ' О АР } “ ëg ‘“ . “ ? “ §á “ . “ ? “ % “ . “ ? }ъ “ “ . “ АР } “ }§ " . ? “ ” . “ ? “ §§ “ . ” ? “ “ . “ АР % “ % . " р “ “ - “ о Р “ “ - “ ? то “ “ - “ ? “ §i§ “ . “ ? “ ” . “ ? “ ” . ” ? “ “ . “ a? “ % “ . “ ? “ §á “ . ” ? “ }§ “ . ” ? “ “ . ” ? “ , ;Í “ . “ above prices based n oak r birch. any other ? “ % “ . “ woods % extra. ? “ “ j . “ state return r thickness f pilaster. romanÍdorr; i exterior. pilaster. interior. nvmiier. width. height. prices. (for natvral wood finish.) Ó inch€ ­ % inches- si ~ еж“- nvmber. width. height. prices. “ % “ - inches. inch. . each. ç f i-Öo f “ §§inches. . “ u Í n - “ }{ “ “ . “ “ . / “ - “ o “ ,.'/ “ . “ ii u n - “ }á “ § “ . “ i “ “ - u “ §§ “ . “ и “ u И ( и . “ А “ “ о-оо “ ; ò “ “ . .“ “ @sá “ то “ “ “ . “ “ “ “ “ и _ “ “ }§ “ i “ lo “ âgé и . и “ “ . “ " ‚ ­ , ъ „ d l ­ t ‚ h i/ „ н оке prices )ase n oak or birch. any other "* ' woods % extra. above prices svrject t discovnt. all capitals and brackets listed under the heading exterior can also he furnished for interior plaster ñnish at same price. t НЕ decorators svpply co. rqman ionic. marcellvs. pilaster. roman doric. pilaster. either of the above two pilastcr caps shown сап be used with column Сар. instrvctions and explanation page . the decorators svpply Со. constantin exterior. colvmn. pilaster. nvmber. diameter. height. prices. nvmber. width. height. prices. % inches. inches. $ . each. % inches. inches. $ . each. n н б‘оо n . с. ¿i % “ “ s % " - " % “ % “ - “ % " % “ % “ s “ . “ % " s “ . “ state return or thickness of pilaster. septimvs severvs. exterior. colvmn. pilaster. nvmeer. diameter. height. prices. nvmber. width. height. prices. inches. % inches. $ . each. inches. sëfá inches. s . each. “ % “ . “ ." % " . “ “ € “ . “ “ " . “ “ % “ . “ “ % . “ “ a “ . “ " . “ state return ' thickness of pilaster. above prices svbject то discovnt. all capitals and brackets listed under the heading exterior can also be furnished for interior plaster finish at same price. above furnished in exterior or plaster only. n twheidecorators svpply co. colvmn. exterior. interior. nvmber. diameter. height prices. (for тупим“ wood finish') inches. “а inches. . each. nvmber. diameter. height. prices. “ и . и inches. ;/ inches. ~$ . each. “ % “ . “ “ % “ - “ a “ % “ “ “ % “ - “ io “ % “ . “ a “ “ ~ ‘i “ “ . “ “ % “ » “ a “ “ . “ io “ Á ‘i - a i “ “ _ @ “ “ , ; “ . “ “ % “ . “ i ‘i ‘i i ­ и a “ % “ . “ “ “ . “ “ % “ . “ “ “ . “ “ % “ . “ above prices based on oak or birch. any other woods % extra. ihlaster. exterior. interior. nvmber. width. height. prices. y (Гон natvral wood finish') inches. % inches’ $ .ю ежи. invmber. width. height. prices. и и . и inches. % inches. $ . each “ % “ “ - :is/ê “ - “ a “ % “ . “ n % “ ­i° u “ щ “ . “ А “ “ “ и / и , s " % “ ~ “ i и io и . и n “ “ “ „и “ . i “ / “ . “ a “ % “ . “ и и — “ “ “ . “ “ % “ . “ “ / “ . o “ “ % “ . ‘ above prices based on oak or birch. any other woods % extra. state return or thickness of pilaster. above prices svbject то discovnt. АН capitals and brackets listed under the heading exterior can also be furnished for interior plaster ñnish at same price. timiidecorators svpply co. д colvmn. copyrighted ey the decorators svpply Со. roman doric. diocletian. a: Г _y,” Ут)'!т)” )т)т’ ‘Юттштттхюптем-‚ш. п.ю‚юттжтш‚м„ ‚ .......... i ` - \il?'ìßwwel'wnîfhfüwßfmfiß'nfw 'i Ёжик/т ‚г шцшщиишимр . . ‘ if?. w??? . А ‚ ц ` ~ ` ‘_. ` ' ’ _ И e ­ ‘s .:­ mi; z Ё i? > Ч . ‚ _j „ . ‚ ‚. г «~ m — y а А. y wf’. _ В d. ` copyrighted 'av the decoratorsisvpply co. ‚Г? rexford new/comm pilastern „о____„„„ instrvctions and explanation page . ц п ЭЕСОКАток svpply Со. colvmn. exterior. interior. nvmber. diameter. height. prices. (for natvral wood finish.) o inches. inches. $ . each nvmher. diameter. height. prices. % u s'Óo u inches. % inches. $ . each. д. f и d ’ ю u '” „ '°° „ % “ . “ и i l и . ú п к . a ‘t i / l и . “ и “ _оо и i и ‘ . ‘i n и iÓ и ‘ . и и io/llá и . u . h и ПИ и . и “ % “ . “ above prices based on oak or birch. any other woods % extra. pilaster. exterior. interior. nvmber. width. height. prices. (for nÀtvral wood finish) inches. % inches. $ . each. nvmber. width. height. prices. soi и ilyî ‘ inches. % inches. $ . each. u . и и ' % и _ u ‘ . ‘ и % и . и ` l и " ‘ а к к i / / н u b .; k ° i .. ”И . '°° .. “ , / ’ “ - “ iÓ и ./ “ . ‘ u loll/b н . u % ' “ i% “ . “ “ }ё “ . “ above prices based on oak or birch. any other woods % extra. state return or thickness of pilaster. above prices svbject то discovnt. all capitals and brackets listed under the heading exterior can also be furnished for interior plaster finish at same price. . t НЕ decorators svpply co. СОЦ/МЫ. exterior. interior. nvmber. diameter. height. prices. _ (for nati'ral wood finish) % inches % inches. . each nvmber. diameter. height. prices. “ “ . “ inch. â/g inch. $ . each. a % “ % “ . “ % inches. {Ё . “ . o “ “ , “ . “ “ % nches. . “ % " % “ . “ % “ iâá “ . “ % “ . “ “ / “ % “ “ . “ % ” % “ . “ “ % “ . “ " “ . “ % “ , ( “ . “ % “ “ . “ “ “ . “ “ ‘з ‘ . % “ % " . “ % “ ' % “ . “ “ . “ ” / / “ . ” % “ ” . “ a ‘ “ “ . “ ” % “ . “ “ “ . “ “ , ” . “ a ?/ u i Ц . “ “ % “ . “ “ “ . :‘ “ % “ . “ .А % “ % ‘i . о f a “ “ . “ “ ‘ . ‘ “ “ ' . “ “ %/ ” “ ” ” . ” “ “ . “ “ ' “ . “ “ % “ . “ a “ пи, “ . “ i “ % “ . “ “ % “ . “ “ h; :‘ . ‘i ” % “ . “ “ ‘l . Ь “ % “ . “ ‘l Н . u “ “ . “ . ‘ % _ . “ % ” . “ above prices based on oak or blrch. any other woods % extra. pilaster. exterior. interior. nvmber. width. height. prices. (for natvral wood finish) % inches~ % inches- $°- ° each nvmber. width. height. prices i n ­ % u - Ц inch И; inch. $ . each. a % " % Ц — “ % inches. т “ . о " Н % н Н “ % inches. . “ i % и % u i~ Ц % “ iâ/g “ . “ Н % u i- Н “ % " . “ % u И - и % “ % “ . “ n % Н . Н “ % “ . “ % u % И i~ и % “ / “ . “ Н н Н h / “ “ % н % n - Н % “ % “ . “ Н Ó ‘l h “ % “ . “ i % Н Н - Н А % “ “ . “ io u h . И “ “ . и Н % И - u a % “ /( “ . “ ” % h . “ “ % “ . “ “ % ” - ” А % “ % “ - “ a i Н % Н - Н “ " . “ iÓ И io И - Н “ % “ . “ Н ios/ h . Ц ” “ “ u iii- Н - н “ % “ . “ a “ / “ . " “ % “ . ” b ” ‘ ” . ” “ o /é Н “ l Ц Н . ” “ “ . “ “ / “ . " “ пои “ . “ Ц ” . “ “ “ . “ o “ % ” . ” above prices based on oak or birch. any other woods % extra. state return or thickness f pilaster. above prices svßject to discovnt. all capitals and brackets listed under the heading exterior can also be furnished for interior plaster finish at same price. the decorators svpply Со. cou/mn. copyrighted ey the decorators svpi'ly Со. modern ionic. ` semi-classic. copyrighted ey Тнв degorators svpply co. pilaster. instrvctions and explanation page . ij в ri`he decorators svrply co. cou/'ii х. -e.\ thor. interior, nvmber. diameter. height. prices. Т (ШК Äatwral “ood finish') _ _ l Хитин. diameter. height. prices. io » i . ' ‘ s. .-. f .. . .- - io i à / cÚ € ;/ s@ ‘s’ @mil inch. % inches. $ . each. f _”f - u i А " i l то; f a ¿iâ “ д % inches. iy'á ‘ . “ ’- r’ . О .. ‚ и u ‘s los, a ‘i ; ‘c í и ‘ % . _ . / . \ Í и â -./ . . . “ i-so ь- . ‚- в‘ ‚, v/ а ..- — ‘ // « ‚., i s / »sê/‘ì i 'go д _` _ u (С? u. " g. ‘fz “ “ . “ l i Ö‘ . ilo.. и u’ о м % “ “ -о ’‚ ,‚ ‚, ' . ‘ŕ ‘/ u д. / u .' n . io( _ м ,/ и ' i. % “ % „_ и ì э i] ,. ` . . .. .. ‘Ú "' il' и io` u ,/ в. qd в; / bfi/á l .ii/ l i . ill-i о ‘i „y u’ . _, i.’ / il ". п “ l ioÓo (qi/ "’ ' ' а и Э ./ “ / “y d», ‘a [iii А oÁ . .i io ­ o и ~/ и i ‘i ‚ / и d. .i . u io ii , ‘s / и ¿i “ i... ‘i ` ___, . /. l . ‹ . n' с- u' n u ` ц д l ' . ._ i i i i ‚ ‘х и Ц . О ¿s l( u i и \ y' . " / “ . °‘ ” n “ . “ .‚ ‚ l( ai n _, ц i “ y d io % . ‘ , / . iii() и и i / и _ „_ .«. “ % “ . " Д. ' и / и ’ “Э и А “ У “ “ ”И . _ . .. . и / i _ и i “ ­ ‘ io b iii i и ‘ ;/ а “ / “ “ i , 'oo .f ­ " ' u d _ ‘i u. io~o и _ / д oo “ iÓ ‘ i ‘_эо f и h ..« ° и ” ‘ ‘ “ «i -oo “ . в‘ / i( oo u above prices based on oak or birch. any other woods €?. extra. pilaster. ` ` y ) ‚ч ext erior. inierior. ' for natvral wood finish. nvmber. width. height. prices. . y( ) .\'\'.\ ber. width. height. prices. “ — % “ - si -oo @afb i i inch. i И inches. . each. i x l Í “ - ,l inches. , “ . “ А l - “ % “ ` . “ “ % “ i ­ " % “ l “ - u ii А i “ “ “ u i ­ sÁ u “ . ‘í % ‘ . “ Ó i.Óo “ “ i “ % “ ~ / “ n “ _ и ’ " _ u lq@ a - u , i . ii ` / “ «Из - l % “ /; “ . “ ii Ó " - °° “ .( “ i “ ..._ u i ‚ “ ` ; . . i . - % “ (if/ ‘ . “ и i и _’. h’ ` / Á . Ó и “ ° О “ “ l ‘° . “ i “ - “ а ‘~' ugg qy u _ ’ u o) u a % u ‚ь; u . u Ói . o “ i ‘ -- “ . / ‘ _"' ._ n' / и и Ó и ‚ и до u a ’i Á ., ' izo u . i - l “ % “ . “ u _, и ‘ и ]/ u . ‘s a % “ % “ . “ ‘l // ~ “ “ . “ i ° , / " . “ “ / “ o “ Ц n ¿l . › l] l iÓ “ . l . () il “ % a . u м - “ “ “ . “ d , / u . “ i a “ iÓ “i ч u .. u . ' i“ ` ; А u . А - u i “ % “ . “ ” * В l / к - ‚ “ “ . “ u x ь ,_ д " xi u ( ' ì“ ­ “ ‘ % “ . /o ‘ ` ‘d )- “ “ % “ . “ / y - above prices based on oak or birch. .~ _\’ other woods гос; extra. state return or thickness of pilaster. above prices svbject to discoynt. all capitals and brackets lisie _,..- _ Соьумх. copyrighted bv - Тип Внсокпокз svpply Со. modern n c, with мкм. empire. copyrighted sv Тнв Овсомтокз svpply Со. ЁЧЬАЗТЕК. instva'rloxs and_explanat n page . ТНЕ decorators svpply Со. italian renaissa nce ion ic. pellegrini. colvmn. pilaster. italian renaissance compgsite. bernardino. СОЦ/МЫ. pilaster. instva'rions and explanation page . timiidecorators svpply co. Ñ __„_ colvmn. „_ > lÄihrior. iin ПАНОВ. nvmber. diameter. height. prices. ­ (for .\'at\’r.\l wood finish.) «- l ` ‚/ i ‘ ` о- v ПСПЕЬ- Ё ПСЬЭЬ- б -эс’еасм- Ххжлвнн. Ъпдхпггнк. iieight. prices. и ’ h __ t» l _ _ a j _ / _ + m i _ i inch. f nch. . each. i “ ` / a f? „ ["o „ пспез. já “ ‚ “ ~ ­ l i.i ъ .. f- . д si/ u hä _ ’o ilginches. . ‘ , в . i _q „д: „ i » „ i __ a °@ Ó “ § " С '/ ё i 'qd « в / „ ;> i ' h@ ' - “ c; / u .§ _ - ‘o _ / ' ‘° . ёэ zi ß öff _ ' _ ` }j “ . “ i `j­ _ _lll/ i. _ /é’ ii h i i .? „ "° g “ - “ . q_, _il .. i` i. а i. . i ( d / Ь o . io u _ i _i n _ i. o э . О ii _, ‚о i. “ < g " i „ ,“ ‘ д'д ._ .i h : ; n ­' _ _ l@ ' Зад ‘ . “ n _. n и ь. ь. Ё / ‘_ '] n ‘ / " “ ‘ . „ % „ Ó „ / О í n .o h n Í/ . ' in i _ii . _ î „ . ' / ,. i. _l_ .. __ i. _) i и _ / ( О i. q Э s 'id : ii ). i. l ()[ ­\ Ё i ‘i o-so n u ‘_ u i. n и i u / __ ¿ ' n ii " ‘; “ . “ i / ' i () i', n l u i "О h ‘s ioiÍ/ n'. [_ и °' i °/ i ‘s’ .i l. n / u и . . “ ;{ " . " “ & “ . “ “ ‘Á " -oo " “ с. и А i . . . _ ii Ó i _ i\h ve inices based cui oak cn'lnrch. .Än\' other . l (ч t ‚ _ .. __ .. oois ~ ex ra. . “ ...oo ii „__ inlaster. _ _ liÄlerior. ii\ thior. nvmber. width. height. prices. (for natyrai. wood finish.) ° - - О â anheï ‘îílnche so-qoeach­ nkhiheh. \yidth. läeight. prices ' ‘ «a “ . “ . . -° i д i u if „ h i inch. та ппЛ . . с›еаСЬ. .А / / . i/ . _‚ “ _ _ _ -f „ _ „ , inches. yg . '/ - д _. i. {и ~ ‘ .. i __ l/ _, __ , i в n ches. . sÁ i; i ‘ .i .. i i. y. i. “ ‘ ‚ _ _ „ . ‘ - _q i. / i. i. “ l u h l §l О i / i . / / - ~ ’ . f ’ ‘°"Э .... / ь. _, i. _ _. / и _ i. . . l / Г- д _ i .. / i. _, i. i и i/ м _ a idlz . ,/ l _, .l [/ n ‘n `_„ ‘Ь i# / «­ - .. Íwgn ‘ / . >ъ . \„‘ u __ и _ “ " , .i , .. ‚ __ .. ‹ . Á i ' d _ _ _ i/ n Í/ в. "'_ ‘s _ . и i/ и и i­Öa ' ‚ч’ i. ;.’ i. i. _ i “ , и _ _ _ — . д - / з --io _ _ , „ _ / i i a / i „ , / ‚ g . / .< ‘ .. " i i. i ` И ii ­/ `› ; / ' ” . ‘ i ‘l/ i _ „ ` i f ii i/ и и iss() , , . ~ _, ._ _ "' i / a ` „ . . ~ i / i. i. ` и i „ ` . \ / è@ , ` l ii i ’ м ` о. ‘­ ii _.,i i. _ Ó_ .. о h. . b- д ` i/ e Äi/ “ — -— “ ‘l ‘if’ ‘ь ’ . \ о "s is _ i. ` / i.' ` ` i. ` и и ` „ ?; . iÓ ' ` i. ` / ii ` ii ` “ ii' ц ‘Í i ь \ (ь н w ‘i и l „ н óìf . . i l i :i i i„ oo i / д ` f -" i.. “ ‘ . “ ‘ Ч a “ ' “ . “ “ “ . “ “ ёё “ . “ . “ “ . “ - \ ‘t _ t. - s ‘ i iÓ /- i\h ve inaces lnuxxl on (ndt or lnrch. .Àrnr other ‚. и _ ii в. ' - ivoods €@ extra. state return or thickness of püaster. ixhove phuces sybject to ihscovnt. all capitals and brackets listed under the heading exterior can also he furnished for interior plaster finish at. same price. ТНЕ ВЕСОКАТОКБ svpply СО. colvmn. italian­ renaissance Íonic. scamozzi. q, i .;`\ &.\ \ copyrighted by the daconnons svpply cn. pilaster. instrvctions and explanation page . the decorators svpi-)lv С . colvmn. pilaster. with festoons with festoons exterior. interior. exterior. interior. nvm- price with nvu- priceiiith nvai- price with nvm- price with eer' diagfi. height festoons her d . height feetoon her wiiith iieii;ht festoons ber width height festoons ? in. i/áln. $ . oea. ? in. д nr $ . oca. ? in. . $ . ea. ? in. % hl $о. са. ? ” ' ” . ” ? ' ” n ” . ” ? ” ' ‘ . ” ' ” дв" . “ a? ” ‘ " . ” ? ” ‘н ” . ” a? }, " ‘‚ " . ” ? ï ' “ ‚ ; " ? " s " . ” ? ' ” ‘а" . ” ? " g " ‚ " ? " " , “ ? “ ' " . ” ? ” ” . " ? ' " ' ” . ” ? ” ” . “ ? ” " . ” ? ' " u . ” ? ” ” . ” ? " " . " ? Ь “ ” . Ü ? ” ' ” . ” ? '; ” ' ” . ” ? ” ' " , “ ? " ” . “ ? _ ' “ ' “ . " ? " " . " ? ' “ ’ " . ” ? " ßí “ . “ ? " " . " ? ' ” ' " . " ? “ “ . " ? ” " . “ ? ” з'н “ . “ ? “ ‘к ” . ” ? ” ‘ " . “ ? " и . ? х '» x . ï ? '; x ' . " ? ” ” . " ? n '? и . Н ? ' u n . n ? п ‘? l . ï ? |/ ” з " _ h ? . ? . ? '; ' . ‘ ? ” ” . “ ? ” “ . ” ? ' " ' ” . ” ? ” ' ” . ” ? ' " : il . ” ? 'í ” '? “ . ” ? s ” " . ” ? io'í ” " . " ? ” ёя ” . ” ? " ' “ . " ? ‘ ” ” . " ? ” ' ” . ” a? " ” . " ? ” ‘ ” . ” ? ” '?“ . ” ? ” ” . " ? ” ' " . ” ? ” ' " . " ? ' " ” . ” ? ” ' ” . ” ? ' ” ” . " ? “ g ” . ” ? ” ‘ ” . ” ? ” s ” . ” ? ” ‘ ” . ” ? " " . ” ? ” ' ” . ” ? " ‘ ” . ” ? " ' ” . " ? ” ” . " ? " ‘ “ ss u ? ” ” . ” ? " ; ” . ” ? ” ” . " ? " s ‘ . ” ? ” ” . ” ? “ ” . ” ? ” 'в " . “ ? "` ‘к " . ” ( ? ” i " . ” ? ” ” . ” a? ” “ . " ? ” " . ” ? ” ‘ “ . ” ? ” ” _. “ _ ? " n . “ f n ' ” - и a? ” ” . ” a? ” " . " ? ” ” . ” ? ” ” . " " “ “ ? " ‘ “ ” above prices baâed on oak or birch. any other woods % extra. above prices based on oak or birch. any other woods % extra. . . btate return of thickness of Р э‚_ ‘. . . colvmn. pilaeter. .y f p ` i ГН drops. \»\"l i Н drops. exterior. interior. exterior. interior. nvm- price хиты nm- price with nv.“- price with nvm- price with ber iham. iiehhh` drovs ber inah. henurr drops her vvhwh ihnght drops eer vvuan height drops in, iljin, $ . a, in. % l $ . oea. in. : . . еа. in. % l . . ” ‘ ” . ” i'í ” s“ . “ ” 'Í " . ” ” ?ъ ” . ” А " ' " . " ” '? " . " ad ' " ' " . ” ” ' " . ” " :fs ” . " 'í " ' " . “ " ” . ” >á ” ” . ” “ l? “ . ” " ” . “ p ' ” '? ” . ” “ ” . ” ' “ " . “ " ” . ” ” " . " ” ” . " ” ” . ” " ' n . И ‘ " ” . ” ” ” . “ in ' ” “ « . “ ’s “ ‘ " . ” " ' “ . ” " '“ . ” lá" j ” . " ” °' . ” ‘ ” ' ” . ” ” “ . " " " . " ” в" . h ” " . ” ” '? ” . " sfá ” “ . " ” '» ” - " ' " ” . ” " ' “ . ” " ‘ ” . " ” ‘ " . n ' u sÍ? ” . ” ” х" . “ / ” ” . " ” ” . ” ' " ” . ” " ; " . ” “ ” ` . ” ' ” " . " " ” . ” “ ' " . ” ” ?в " . ” ” н ” . " ’ " " . “ " " . " " ' ” . ” ” ‘ ” . ” " ' " . ”_ s'á ” ; " , " ” ” - . o ” ” '? ” . " ” “ . " “ 'т " . ” " ' " . “ a ' ” " . ” " ' ” . " " " . “ ” x ” . ” ” ‘ " . “ ” " . ” “ ‘ " . " " ” ” ” ' " . " ". ” . ” ” ‘ ” . ” ” " . “ ” " . ” ” ” . ” “ " . " " ” . ” ” " . " ” " . " ” бдн" . " " ” ” ° " '? . " " ” . " " ” " " " . ” a “ " . ” " '; ” . ” ” }; ” . " " " “ ” ' ” . “ ‘ " " . " . А ” ” . ” ‘ “ ” . ” " ” . " " “ . “ ” ! ” . " above prices babed on oak or birch. any other woods c; extra. above prices basel on oak or birch: any other woods % extra. state return of thickness of pilaster. above prices sveject то discovnt. ll capitals and brackets listed under the head of exterior can also be furnished for interior plaster ñnisli at same price. t НЕ decorators svpply Со. italian renaissance iÚnic scamozzi. colvmn. with festoons. Р ЬА ТЕ r. with festoons. colvmn. with drops. pilaster. with drops. instrvctions and explanation page . ’viie decorators svppin С . c<>i,\'.\ii\’. hxterior. interior. eon natvral'wood fnusu. nvmber. diameter. height. prices. ( ) . ,. nnaiher. i)l\meter. iìennvl prices. inches. g inches. si. c>each. iÓl a “ “ _@@ “ i inch. iêöinches $ . each. “ " _ о “ псЪез. “ . “ o' и ,_ n д n И ‘É i. _ (б )-) , -., / э - f ‚ _. ._ ,’ п / u и a “ " . } . “ “ _ @ “ " j@ “ . “ i ц n п (в Í “ А “ . iÓÖi ? о в; qs: .. З . и u . и } “ “ . “ ”; " “ . “ ‚ n \ м _ С‘ “ “ “ . ÓÖ - ‚ , “ u ) _ ,_ `,/ n ч a/ ь‘ ¿d a “ ' ­­ iÓÖd д”: ‚ . / l э i “ “ . " б " “ . “ ‚ _' , n n _ f’ и и ‘c “ ув . / ‘ б._о ‚ ' ‚_ .. ,j ь; ,_ a a “ “ . " @sb - , ~. д ' ‘w и is _ и “ .‘ . ‘ Ö -/ / и о ‹ н ~/ ц a “ i . ‘ io %' “ -/ i “ “ . " “ “ . “ “ } “ . “ “ “ - “ above prices l'iased on oak or birch. any other oods c; extra. pilaster. (von natvral~wood fnusn. nvmber. width. ‘ height. prices. ) . ,. Ахжпппь `“Ч тн. ЪПпспт. ihuces inches. lginchcs. $ . uńr и í ß ,_ @ ß inch. lìáinches. $ . emch. .“ “ . “ l пспеэ. “ . о “ “ “ . “ Т “ % “ - “ ., ‚ _ ,_ n' t' ь‘ хрбА „ “ p “ l “ m % % ‘ . _, ‘i “ ‘Ö “ “ . i. “ @ . a “ “ . “ " §Í “ — “ “ $ё “ . “ “ “ - “ j “ ‘ì ‚_ .ì и / n' w h' А “ . » -Öo “ “ . “ “ " io “ a “ “ . “ “ / n n i o и % и и и d . i _, _, l,/ s.' i( ‚.. ‘ “ “ . “ /- - . ‚ ‚ч ì _ n " “ _ a “ “ . “ и . - . э и а _, i “ “ . “ ­Öb i “ “ . “ “ " io. “ “ “ . “ “ “ - “ “ “ . “ “ “ . “ - above prices based on oak or birch. any other voods c@ extra. state return r thickness of pilaster. \ßove ihuces sveject то ihscovxt. all capitals and brackets listed under the her-uling exterior can also be furnished for interior plaster finish at same price. ЧЧЫ ЭЕСОКАТОНБ svpply СО. и colvmn. copyrighted by Тнв Ввсомтокз svpply co. italian renaissance corinthian. sansovino. copyrighted bv Тпн Овсомтояз svpply co. ЪЧЬАБТЕН. instryctions and explanation page . ЧЧЫЕПЭЕСОКАТОКБ svpply c . (Хижжпш exterior. штыкюк ГЧчмввк. ЕЛАМЕТЕК. llßunrn lüucßs. (РОК natvral wood рюпзнд inches_ líinches. _ (лц ъ ХХжаннк. i)l meter„ iÍehsht. prices. “ “ _@@ “ inch. iëöinches. $ . mch. “ }; “ . “ l incbcs. “ , “ “ “ , “ “ “ . “ А % “ . ” “ . но “ . , / “ . “ “ “ . " “ g “ “ А } “ " _ @ “ " i( “ . “ “ : “ . " " & “ . “ х “ " . “ n iÍ “ - u “ “ . “ n “ -„ и А % “ ”ё? " - “ % " % “ “ “ “ _ @ “ “ “ “ “ “ . " ` о “ . “ А “ Ъ “ _ “ “ : “ . “ “ ;{ _“ . “ ‘ “ - “ “ о} “ . “ “ “ - и “ “ . “ “ “ . “ “ “ . “ “ “ - “ above prices based n oak r birch. any other xvoods } extra. inlastur. exterior. interior. Ínvmber. vvhhwl ' ЪПЫонт. Лисв& чл<ХАТУКАь‹шООПХЦХП”Ъ) _ _ nvmher. \vhnwl ЪЫпснт. ЕЛЫСЕ$ inches. nches. $ . oexuńr и и ‚. ß inch. ißâinches. $ . fxuńr .“ “ _ “ iyíinches. “ _ö@ “ “ “ . “ “ “ . “ a “ “ . " / “ “ - u “ }§ “ . . “ “ “ . “ a “ “ . “ " “ - ü “ ёё “ . “ “ “ - “ А }{ “ “ . “ “ “ . “ “ “ . “ d “ - u А “ ;( “ . “ § “ “ - u “ “ . “ “ “ - “ “ “ . “ “ “ - “ a “ “ . " “ ' “ - к “ “ . “ “ “ - a “ то}; “ . “ " “ - a “ “ . “ “ “ . “ “ “ . “ “ “ . “ - above prices based n oak or birch. any other vvoods % extra. state rcturn or thickness oflaüaster. ;\bove ihncus siject то ihscovxt. all capitals and brackets listed under the beadingr exterior can also be furnished for interior plaster finish at same price. t i-i e dectmif-vroas Биты Со. col .v.\i n. exterior. .nvmber. ihameter. ihught. Ркпчъ. inches. §inches. . œu “ }{ “ . “ “ “ . " “ }: “ . “ “ “ . “ furnished in exterior and plaster only. " l m/ii n. ext erior. interior. for natvral wood fhhsh. nvmber. imameter. thmgnt. Ркшвз. ( ) . /. _ nvmeer. imameter. thmght. Рацию. inches. loyzinches. . each. “ “ б_ и nchcs. y nches. . c each. ’ " it ‘ь “ h a ° a “ . ‘ З - . f (в и u %; “ . , “ ‘ / _ @ _ ¿n ¿c ‘t “ “ ` . “ - “ “ . “ h “ . “ “ " . “ above prices based n oak r birch. any other ivoods % extra. state return thickness f püaster. \b ve prices sanect to ihscovxt. all fapitals and brackets listed under the headingt exteriorcan also be furnished for interior plaster finish at same price. the decorators svpply С . à n_n иди. î' _y y ŕ i* german renaissance. diÍrer. copyrighted by the decorators svpply co. copyrighted by Тнв decorators svpply co. moorish. alhambra. instvations and explanation page . ïïnilecorators svpfly co. coiynn 'l i a. . nvmber. diameter. height. prices. (for natvral wood finish.) inches iáinches $ . each. iqvmber. .diameter. iÄeight. prices ­ и > / u ,_ . . . l ‘ -/ и inches. inches. $ . each. Ó u u - u . “ § “ . “ “ / ‘ . _ “ f§ “ . “ ì h l Ö u ? u ~ u “ “ . “ a / - l “ g “ . “ “ ( “ . “ “ : и ;_ И и _, Í к ' o' ч i i l ~Óo ‘ “ }{ “ . " f f . “ “ “ . “ “ zoßá “ . “ “ “ . “ “ } “ . “ _ . “ “ ¿ _ “ :xbove innees based (n oak (n'lnrch. y cnher g и () н ; h woods % extra. y ) . ` i iilashnm exterior. interior. nvmber. width. height. prices. (for natvrai. woon finish.) inches. )@ haches. . each. tcviieer„ \vidtil iiehsht i?rices. ‚. и l/ и ' a . . д i ‘ i-Óo inches. &í nches s .ooeßch. ‚ u' д í i’. u' ‚ . . } “ “ . “ _, Ч ¿c и Н “ _, s ` “ q u . “ ,’ ’ ¢ u ‘ }{ ‘ . l “ § “ . “ t _‚ и ‘ А q % . и “ и и . л .› /{ . Ó “ и . “ и / 'i _, ,_ и ‘ u ‘ ‘ . ‘ ‘ | }í . “ f y i . д / n' и ‘ . . “ } “ . “ “ / “ . î i( ”З d( í . . . i и и . и ove innces based (n oak cw lmrch. ¿xny ther ` ’ д ivoods % extra. state return or thickness of pilaster. " ` Соквьь exterior. interior. corresponds (for natvral wooo fnushj ;\hacvs projec- “чти c rresp nds tjvmeer.\nidth. twon. iiemhve cap. ihuces. abÀcvs pr jec- wÃth (На in. ` . . . ea. Мишки. width. тюк. height. cap. prices. / и u' _, ее u' . . . и ~/ iiv /êä и ' f u u u s - @ @ и и - u “ “ “ a . “ и ;/ u / и ‘ u :il/í u “ - a / u и и . ‘ “ “ “ . ; “ ‚— » »v р- ‘ д ‚' ь „ %/ „ / „ a - .‘ m . “ .i ­ ‘ . . “ i i ‚ i ‘ ­­ ‘ _if a ­-/ и a/ . _, и g; u За} u ;? u . u d _ u q ; a и “ " " и _) ёд . l _, / “ "/ (l i/ (c á( ь ' - f . “ }_ ì§ “ . “ “ Ъ{`“ ‘ “ . “ “ “ “ . “ :above inúces based chi oak (к lńrch. . y cmher “ “ “ . “ ‘т Ъеэжга . „wl/ . v / / В и дб„ i . - i\bove ihuces svbject to [hscovnt. all capitals and brackets listed under the heading, exterior can also be furnished for interior plaster finish at same price. the decorators Вити Со. " colvmn. exterior. interior. nvmber. imameter. phhght. prhwß. (tor natvralinoodihnhÑl) inches. ßâinches. . xud a`tjber' iulÃmeter" iielght' БЦНСЕЗ- sooo м и o н inches. inches. $ . each. “ “ . “ “ }{ “ . “ “ § “ . “ “ “ . “ “ . “ “ “ . “ “ “ . “ “ € “ . “ “ “ . “ Í “ “ . “ м “ . “ “ “ . “ “ “ . “ “ “ . “ “ “ . " “ §Í “ “ “ “ . “ “ §§ “ . “ “ “ .оо “ . / ’ “ % s . “ i - “ “ “ . “ u “ “ “ g “ . “ ove eres basmd on cxń§ or bhch. ¿any cńher voods год? extra. pilaster. - ЬХТЕККЛ{ МТЕКПЛ{ nvaiber. width. height. prices. (por natyral wood finish) о _ nvmber. yvhnwl phhght. prhhß. & nches nches . each. a ‹« и i oo a inches §inches $ . each. “ }; “ , “ “ “ . “ “ g “ _ “ “ “ . “ “ “ , “ “ } . “ “ ё “ . “ “ ‘ “ . “ “ “ . “ % " И “ i . “ “ “ . “ “ бЁ “ . “ “ “ . “ ?/ “ “ . “ “ ħ “ . “ “ “ . “ “ “ . “ " “ . “ “ “ . “ u u - “ “ ОЁЁ “ . “ “ “ . “ ‘ “ “ _ @ “ “ “ . “ “ “ . “ \Ъоче {hices based (n oak cn'lńrch. .an}f other woods } extra. state retufti or tinaniess of ynlaster. \rove thuces sveject то thscovnt. all capitals and brackets listed under the. h »ading exterior can also be furnished for interior plaster finish at same price. t НЕ ВЕСОКАТОКБ svpply Со. colvmn. \ u* ч ‚ ` . ` ‘l nw, y skis: l.' ‘iy i »wat .imi Соппюнтвв ny Тнв dacokuoxs svpply co. italian renaissance. venice. covvnmm-ßn by Тнв Овсомтокз svpply co. pilaster. instvatons and explanation page . the decorators svpply c . colvmn. greek corinthian. winds. pilaster. instrvctions and explanation page . the decorators svpply Со. colvm n. exterior. interior. nvmber. d_iameter. height. prices. h (for КАП—“Ь wood “мм” nches. inches. $ . each. „ % . м Мтмвнк. diarieter. height. prices. Ó . м _ и inches. у; inches. $ . each. Н Н . ” % ‘a , Н . u “ ‘ . “ ‘ i “ - “ “ % “ - “ " % ” . “ “ a “ . “ n % Н . “ “ % “ . “ i ' / " ’ “ . “ u ” . " Ц Н . “ “ % “ . “ % ' % “ > . “ “ “ . “ И %' Н . “ “ % “ . " % и / “ . “ ” “ . “ Н ” . " “ % " . “ . “ ‘ “ . “ “ " ` . “ Н . " - Н “ “ ........... ' h % ‘ . “ “ io “ . “ Н “ . “ “ % “ . " i Н , n - h “ “ . “ и " . “ “ % " ........... il ‘i . “ . “ “ . “ i н “ . “ “ ‘ " . _" above prices based on oak or birch. any other woods '( extra. .. pilaster. exterior. i interior. nvmeer. width. height. prices. (for natvrai. woop finish Ё ша es % mçiles sigg ее?“ ni'mber. width. height. prices. . „ .. n zo ы / inch % inch. $ . each. и Эй и . м }; , Ц . ‘i “ “ . “ u / u ­ h % 'l . “ % , l . ‘i Н ” . " / Н , Н . И il Ц % " . “ i И -‘ n . и “ “ . ‘ l И / И - Ц “ ‘ " . ; “ .' Ц li u - a h u qq ‘ s i u Í' n . l " % “ . “ si u Н . Ц “ “ . ‘ Í u / Н - Ц n % u . “ Н и ' “ “ . " / % Н - " % ' ........... / Н - l “ io “ . “ ._ v ~ u /‘ " . " i n % ­ “ ” . “ ‘o Н И - “ % “ ........... П % i ~ ” “ . " Н — “ % “ . “ above prices based on oak or birch. any other woods "; extra. state return or thickness of pilaster. state return or thickness of pilaster. above prices svbject то discovnt. all capitals and bracketsl listed under the heading exterior can also be furnished for interior plaster finish at same price. twhsidecorators svpply Со. »colvmn. / a modern french ionic. versailles. »pnßsnüe ixstvatons and explanation page . ф Т НЕ ЭЕСОКАТОК svpply Со. colvmn. exterior. interior. nvmber. diameter. height. prices. (for natvral wood finish.) inches. inches. $ . each. nvmber. diameter. height. prices. Н и ' u inches. inches. $ . each. u u ~ Н i% Ё‘ % “ . “ Н Н - u “ “ . “ Н › ° % ” % ” . “ и :t Ó­ Ц " “ . “ ° ‘o Í: ю . „ И “ % “ - “ и - u “ “ . “ u u . Н / ' Н % Н _ Н ° „ „ . „ “ “ - “ i - % “ % “ . “ Н Ц - ° n “ “ . “ “ “ . ” , “ % “ . “ и u ~ “ “ . “ " “ . " / / Н % Н i . Н Н И - о Ц “ “ . “ И и . Ц “ “ . “ и Н . u “ “ . “ и и - И ” " . ” u u - и ” ” . “ “ “ . “ “ “ . “ above prices based on oak r birch. any other woods l extra. ihlaster. exterior. interior. nvmber. width. height. prices. (for natvral wood finish.) inches. inches. . each. nvmber. width. height. l prices. » inch. inch. $ . each. Ó Н Ó Ц ~ и % inches. % inches. . “ u Н - Н “ “ . “ h _ и - u % “ “ . “ и „ . „ “ “ . “ Ц - “‘ ` % “ % “ . “ ‘i Н ~ u “ “ . “ Ц ‘ ­ Н ,’ “ % “ . “ Ц :a - Н “ “ . “ i „ . „ : “ % “ . “ i . “ ‘ . “ “ “ - “ % j % “ . “ “ " . ” “ “ . “ :Í u ‘Ó f % “ % “ - “ Н " i v a ‘^ “ . “ l И ~ i “ “ . “ - “ " . “ ‘ Н - ” ‘ . “ :l h - : ‘ " “ . “ . “ “ оо ‘ above prices based oak r birch. any other woods % xtra. state return r thickness f pilaster. above prices svbject to discovnt. a capitals and brackets listed under the heading exterior can also be furnished for interior plaster finish at same price. tïuïidecorators svpply Со. colvmn. paris. inlaster instrvctions and explanation page the decorators svpply Со interior. (for natvral wood finish) colvivin. pilaster. nvmber. diameter. height. prices. nvmber. width. height. prices. inches. , / inches. $ . each. inches. % inches. $ . each. % i: % : - С: % “ ?’/ “ - “ Н Н - u l“ “ . о “ % Ц % и i- o h % ‘ % “ . о ” l % u и ’ ” % “ - “ % ‘ - o % “ “ i - “ н «i . ‘nl ii и . п % “ % “ - ‘ % " % “ i ~ “ “ “ . “ " " . “ above prices based on oak or birch. any other woods % extra. state return or thickness of pilaster. interior. (por natvral woon finish) colvm n. pilaster. nvmber. diameter. height. prices. nvmber. width. height prices. inches. % inches. $ . each. inches. % inches. $ . each. % i. . Н % и п . о п Н % ­ и % - Н % “ %; ~ u % и %‹ l - " ‘f “ И ‘ f ‘ - “ % “ % “ - % ‘ /s “ i - “ и и . и н Ó/i м . и н w п Н н н и %` ‘l ‘l Ó là li и above prices based ,on oak or birch. any other woods % extra. ­ state return or thickness of pilaster. above prices svbject то discovnt. the decorators svpply Со. greek. erechthevm. copyrighted ey the decorators sypply co. copyrighted ey the decor/«tons svpply Со. roman. pantheon. instrvctions and explanation page . tihïidecorators svpply Со. mgdern renaissance. empire. copyrighted by the deconarors svpply Со. bracket copyrighted by Тик dacorators svpply co. roman. jvpiter stator. instvations and explanation page . n tiheidecorators svpply Со. bracket ilxterior. interior. abacvs face projec- (for natvral wood finish.) nvmber. width. width. tion. drop. prices. www f СЕ pruec .­ . . П a (_ .- % in. in. % in. in. . ea. nvmber. width. width. tion. drop. prices. ,/ и и / и и u . _ _ _ / Á /É ‘ ' , / . . % . . . ea. u “ ‘ Ó “ i . “ l/ и / и ­ " ь ‘ ‚„ и / a a u и ,_ и ’ / i ' / / ‘ ‘ ‘ “ ' “ “ ‘i Ó “ . и s ‘ ‘ ‘ . ‘ _ , и i/ u _;/ и ,_ u а у и у и ‚_ и а „о и / / ‘ / . Ё “ u / u a .Í ‘ u u u a и i ЧЗ ‘ , . . / / io , § .a % и _‚ .ь u . и и ‘a / и и и \ ~ Í к } . ‚ i/ a a _ . a ' и “ “ / “ “ “ бич 'â io . ' . д ‘c h ' ` ‚- y “ io ‘l ‘г до ‘l и “ “ Ó'ÓÖ a : - lo и .i / и iÓ и . a f f' ' bracref exterior. interior. abacvs face projec- (for natvral wood finish.) nvmber. width. width. tion. drop. prices. тис“ РЖЕ prohtc i in. in. in. in. si . ea. nvmber. width. width. tion. drop. prices. и u a и и . _ _ d / ‘ ‘ ' }á hl hi hl hl . еа. и “ ‘ ‘ . О и f i.' i в / “ u u, “ ‘ ‘ - “ “ “ . „ a .. a a Ó a »i a ac a и и , io ' s i “ . и u Ó i.' ее Ó а и Ц И и . í( Ц ‘s’ ‘l “ ils/á “ “ “ “ . “ “ “ “ “ . “ }{ “ “ “ “ . “ above prices svbject to discovnt. all capitals and brackets listed under the heading exterior can also be furnished for interior plaster finish at same price. t НЕ decorators svpply Со. italian renaissance. cecile. copyrighted by Тнв Овсокпопз svpply Со. Сорукшнтвп by Тнв Внсонпокз Бугрьу Со. italian renaissance. zorzi. .instvations and explanation page . п ЭЕСОНА к svpply С . bracket. -seiiii-classic a. r ч ~ exterior. interior. abacvs face projec~ (por nati'rai. wood finish.) invmber. width. “idth. tion. drop prices abacvs face projec_ iii. in. in. / . $ . ea. . .\ieer. width. width. tion. drop. prices. / Н '/ Н __ l l и i/ н __ н ____ _ __ _ _ _ _ iîë „ f* n / u -lo _ ; d. h n. h hl wqih. $ . ea. i _ _ _/ н , _so () _ ‘ i н _ с. i п o м u u h l, Н u »- f и f н ` / н .f и ‚ч п и i и / и / и .()o «i iss i ‘ , 'bo /» % _ ; „ itn: н ill/á «i и , м п ­­ ' в ` * " /p « ‚ ' yg n : Н Н y.; l . Н Н i и. ч н в“; и i oo м к " i/ ,- l ' l/ н i// и _i п п ____ «i l _ __ __ ь __ _ _ __ __ g .. .. ¿ŕ .. Ёж .. _ „ îf .. ‚, .. v .. ; „ ”О „f ‚ ‚ >’ -j . ' ч i it t / ‘l _ ч i _ _ Í, f / l» _ Н / Н ' н Н . м ; ‘ fl/ h и Н i'Óo a lt l ú x io / : h / Н iol/ë __ / __ . __ Н и м : . згёп __ и o н g“ _ ; п í" lá“ á" " . ” i«‘\ ` /“ iÓ; f* i „"~ oy “ — “ `i/ Н “ ` и .. „ .. '“ .. 'l .. n dÍ/ Н s f / Н . «i il ‘ils ' ‘ / u ä”q „ ) п „ З'до n И И n “ . ” il ц ii- __ н — «s _,f ‘n s» __ __ h А‘ ( ,/ l Н «a _o u Ц Э ,l __ __ б __ d'Ós __ i “ .. ’f .. / .. '.çÈ „ .. , / h % - q/È п / н / н (sÍ/z/ «i . и Н Ó И : h ,“ И o ; Н , х «y Н l Ь ” ‘ . “ i С j “ ” ; ‘ . “ Н “ ” “ . “ bracke l ._seiii-classic в. ` y exterior. . interior. ahacvs face projec- ' (por natvrai. wood finish.) v r .y . ~‘y Т . ‘ . \‚ meer. width. “idth. tpo/n. drpp. _prices _ a_mcvs each pr(,jec_ . / _ _ ­ __ _ _ ­ _ _ _ ­ _ _ ­ - fffl- . .\ieer. “idth. width. тюк. drop. prices. v д f ‚(о „ . . . . . _ a ,j „ ii „ ЁЁ h ) „ yáin. hñin. ‘Ün n. zäfin. $ . ea. § ;/« i/.» : / . _`__ il/ п i «i il i i.' п ; н ` А f ’ i ' d il t ‘l h ' i( i .i ‘l _’ __ ‘ н / н ? u ’ìë п „ § ” “ }; “ §í ” . ” ®ё / . \ - .. if.. - .. .. „ ч l ;/ н / / l п _ п i i’s . ; '/ f ,* @Á - u" 'x/ «i / п l и ч п `_ п / ” / “ “ “ " ° ›@ /ж ‘ . ’ . / о l l f’ (А о { н ‘Í h „ ’; н д и ` ” ь ‘ @ . g , ’ З` ' - "" ­/ н i/ м ì/ н- i/ п ` п " Ъё“ ” ЁЁЁ ” ” — “ ‘ / : : - ’ / h -Óx „ jq/ „ “а; u `_д a i “ ” " " . ” g , ," . . ` " / н k/ «i ` / Н д ' и м l _ n u „ _ „ ;_ „ , _ д . ”; н ,/ н / н п '( a o î§ “ ” a И h . " § * / / ? i() lo ` 'i/ и ` l/ п ` " / н д/ н и _'Ё`_ н __ Н г) н l__c') / н ____ и / , f : . . / __ Öi/ __ / __ " / __ _ -lÖ __ § н м _ н м н Ч/З {о ` / п i/ и _ i/ н _ п y н _%_ н ò п __.’_r/ п z__ м ‘so п . , i() "’ , н i „ '/ u ,/ „ " n @ ” ” “ ” . ” a ó/á lá q . „ ~,/ „ / „ a к a ` 'i u н i и / ` н ' "’ п ‚ ; Ь."О % /; . ’ f ‚ .. д‘ .. ’ , .i .. д „ ‚Ё “ .. / Н i’ “ / “ ч “ - : : __ f_/z __ , __ / __ -‚э __ б % . / - __ _ и н l/ u / __ п , / , . ` i brackei.vmman ч y, ‚` 'f ` ` en i erior. ib i ЬКЮК. АВАСу face prqÍec­ (for natvral “"ood finish.) nviiiber. widtii. ­width. thin. drop prices. .xbacvs face projec- ' ’ ' и! ' v v _ w' v ' a) ` :n . , i ш, % “ _ ¿ , . ca_ mmi- er. \ idth. \ idth. tion. drop. i ricls. _ ___ _.’o l .f t ъь t ____ м _ ‚ - . / . _' . _. §g Á ¿_: zêë h i_/__ . , __ , ißëip. ii/ih. iÍ ih. yáih. $ . ea. “ f s i ." ~ ‘ , . ” i/ н н l м ‚ _; п i м l l п i н i н н , , / ., , , .bo н п , / ¿i к}; и и к; и i и н i _ .so n () _’ ‘i ‘t t( ‘l tb ‘a i( __ iÍ/ (t i ,/ l( _ о (ß ‘l ‘l ‘l ‘l l э l b ‘a il `)­_­ ' ‘c / il ‘l ‘ f . - : : . - - a / Ц И / н ' h п м ls ‘ ‘ / ‘ / ” . " / - . hoi( lli/ н zf Н ¿eni п osi@ н i м ___/_ € is; «i “ ; ; и ; и i во и в l/ и i т / и Н a.' ` Н q __ Н “i ‘ д г` ‘__/ п Н Н .ì и tú , «i )-/ l ‘t i . " « / i д .' н . ; и i . ‘a _ / _ . __ "; / .() _ il l( $ í ll ‘l _ it ‘i i Ó l . Ó'r . Ól/á . Ч Ц ‘l : м l( м «i «l in h / h t( ‘t п it ¿l «s ‘t о. пс __ н — п v/ п __ н _ н _ ' _ __ / ы f ы l/ и __ ц ___ Ó _ _ ' _ _ ‘ . / - . ___ l А _ n il l l ‘u / l» i" А и . о _ ___ ’ «t О А. n [ ! «l î~ (А ,д i , , .,д above prices svbject to discoi'nt. all capitals and brackets listed under the heading exterior can also de furnished for interior plaster ñnisli at same price. t iie decqrators svppiaiy Со. modern renaissance. r semi-classic А. semi-classic b. copyrighted by Тнв deconaïors svpply Со. ВНАСКЕТЗ. ""copyrmhten nv Тнв dumm/«tons svpply co. _ vatican. instructions and explanation page . the dec ra' rs st'ijply c . l v " ' ` f i( .\ ola. ` r ` ` y ` ` — ÈÀiilrior. inieri(-)r. amc“ “С“ pro-'ec' (for nati'rai. wood finish.) nvmher. width. width. тюк. Пкпр. prices­ a ‘ p ­ ­ ­ / - ц i hacvs ace rqiec- ln- n' in' in' bl ' ca Кишка. width. \‘­'idih. thin. drop. prices. q н н „f н __: v/ н _ н . ‚ . . . ‘ д io /is ->o } n„ Óláin. in. & n. s . .›‚ / / iso % “ ’ “ g и “ % ‘i . / в ’ n' ./ ' ‘ ‘ “ “ . и / u / i _ . a % . ‘ % “ f/í ‘ . ‘ ’vi b louis .\ . __` _ y, _ __ _ ilxterior. ii\ii rior. aiiai'vs toix face bdt. face projec- ._ . ‚ ‚ . nvmher. width. width. width. tion. drop. prices, (fur ‘nati ral vi' ood finish) l( in. iâ/g in. % in. / ’ in. % in. $ . ea. ‚ arum- tiwyface iii-@tice Ркщвс- „ и h / н _i, u И \'.\iher. “или. “штн. \id'ih. tion. droi'. prices. % % %; (ivg . _/. у. . v. l . З“ „ y „ % „ v“ h i _s „ y . @ . . . / . . ea. ` а s и Н / н / с «s _ о н - н н н н н % , / ‘ ‘oÖ ‘ , / и (С l h Н i/ н _l н / н е/ н / н ­ св ' i/ / ' b? / iii/ ' _ / н [и и / н z/ н н п / н i/ н н i/ н н _ м д д / / , 'ЬО / / / - св / н / н l,i/ . ;/ н _, н Ól/ и у н н ‚. / Н _ н н "/ / j-' -/ j' о ‚"/ ` / id О _ / н i н gf п ­­/ н l/ н _ п / ЗА / - с‘ «a ' н ( н h и ‘ % н ‘i н h ‚а ` ` .) ` pilasters. r ) f ) r r ) .‘ ' Г \ М В \АС \Е Г. ‚Г \ М cai’. т a interior. interior. (for natvral wood finish.) (for nati'ral wood finish.) ni'mber. width. height. prices. ni'mher. width. height. prices. % iiiclies. % inches. $ . each. () %) iiiclies. туг iiiciies. so. each. _. и „f ‘ ,_ n' , ‚.‚ s ‘i ‘в , / ., . () / € “ . “ % % . °‘ в. ( . и / / / н % и ‚ и __ и / i' ‚‚ и _ / u и / бЁ’З ‘ - % . “ “ “ . “ “ “ . о “ т б “ ‘f “ “ ” “ % . о . l/ ’ % “ - “ _ .i и u - _ u и i и и % Á .so “ “ . “ “ u . и б “ “ . “ above '..ices based on oak or birch. any other above prices based оп oak or birch. any other woods % extra. woods % extra. above prices siject to discoi'nt. all capitals and brackets` listed under the heading..r exterior can aiso be furislied for interior plaster fìiiish at same price. t he decorators svpply Со. french brackets. lovis xvi b. lovis xvi a. pilasters. cap. trim trim bracket. roman. greek. mars. zevs. instrvctions and explanation page . д the decoraiors Биты С‹›. acroteria. ` о r ` ` hÄterior. in l lrior. n\'.\­iber. width. height. thickness. prices. (for natvral wood finish.) % in. in. % in. $ . еа nvmeer. width. height. thicrness. prices. oi ¿l iol/ ‘ i ( ‚__‚ ‘i l. . . ’f А l / ‘ -' ,@ iii. % iii. жуёт iii si. ­ea. / u .ь / и с. Ь‘ Э f ) Э % . _., u / „ ‚ „ д. f /’ u и l ц д. .sg/ iis . —. ` н ‚- —о i l. ‘ l ‚э y „§ - в‘ n ‘/“ k igi/ n i_i/,z/ ¿a ¿s io _o u “- l f l o' i" “ i “ io; “ .c и “ % u n % и - “ , ' , “ “ , " . “ ¿c h i[á в. с. antena. " r` ч y» с ` ЬХ ЬК ОК. ii\ii;ri()r. width то (for nati'ral wood finish.) nvmber. corner. height. thicrness. prices. width то in. ;/ in. iii. $ . ea. nvmeer. corner. height. thicrness. prices. . i “ ( h “ . i А Ó ЗА ) ' за"; / iii % iii. iigm. . gea. _o _ u ,/ и ,_ ¿a _, о и к \- Í~ f \ „ ­ ., l / l' . и i.' ; и . u' ,_ q u i и и Ó и "l ` ' с iiÁ . О .,‚,.. с: ‚_ .i '/ и „o u “ц io д. i a “: _q „ дн „ ‘ э / ‚ . i i. Э --/` .. i ‹ ‚ u n и .- » iÓ­/ и то u io _o “ so А- ," ­­ «l и с. isá u a ¿t ¿i ‘ó (i above prices sviiject to iÍ)isco\'.\'t. М] capitals and brackets listed under the heading exterior сап also be furnished for interior plaster f'iiiisii at same price. t НЕ decorators svpply Со. АСКОТЕК А. antefix. instrvctions and explanation page . the decorators svpply Со. odd brackets, corbels, Етс. nvm- abacvs top face Воттом aeacvs ber. width. width. face width. project. drop. style. remarks. prices. * in. ............. in. in. louis xv .......................... $ . * } " in. in. “ } “ .......................... . * “ " “ “ } “ louis xvi .......................... . “ " “ “ “ " same as cut. except bottom . . " “ “ " “ “ similar to cut .............. . “ “ “ " “ “ ......................... . * “ “ “ sil“ “ “ .......................... . “ } “ “ i! “ “ “ same as cut, without festoon . * & " : “ § “ “ “ " .......................... . * } “ ............ } “ “ louis xv .......................... . * } “ in. . } “ “ louis xvi ......................... . “ “ . " “ “ " same as cut ............... . “ “ “ } " “ ” .......................... . % “ qi Н h } “ “ " heavy abacus, in. thick.. . } “ i “ - “ } “ " “ similar t cut .............. . * } " } “ ï “ “ “ “ ......................... . } " ” “ “ ” " similar tocut .............. . “ “ “ ” “ “ similar to cut .............. . " “ “ “ “ “ .......................... . * “ ............ } “ “ gothic ....................... . } “ ............ “ “ “ ......................... . “ ............ “ “ “ ........... . ......... . “ ............ “ “ “ ......................... . * “ ............ “ “ art nouveau ..... ' .................... . * ; “ . in “ } “ renaissance ..................... .... . “ ” ...... “ } “ louis xvi double face ............... } “ } “ ...... “ } “ “ double face .............. . } “ } “ ...... “ } “ “ single face ............... . } “ “ ...... “ } “ “ double face ............... . } “ “ ...... " } ” ” triple face .............. . * “ “ in “ %“ louisxv . “ ............ “ “ " extreme width, in ........ . * “ } " ...... “ “ louis xvi ..................... . . }“ ” ...... “ “ “ .. .............. . } ” “ “ “ } “ classic .......................... . } “ } “ } “ “ “ greek similarto erechtheum bracket . “ " “ “ “ classic .......................... . ...... “ “ ...... “ greek in. projection, no abacus . . o in. “ “ } in. } “ ornamental abacus ........ . “ “ “ “ .......................... . } " “ “ “ “ classic .. ............... ~ ....... . “ “ ...... “ “ .. .. .................... . “ “ “ “ . “ romanesque _. .. .. ........ ’ ......... . “ “ “ “ “ ......... ............. . “ ............ “ . “ gothic ....................... . “ ............ “ “ ” .......................... . “ ............ “ } “ " circular abacus ............ . } “ in. in. } “ " “ .......................... . * “ ” ...... } “ } “ moorish ................ ` .......... . “ “ ...... “ “ “ ............ ` ............. . * cut on opposite page. numbers following similar in appearance. should above pi'inted description be insuñ'icient, write for designs. above iiiaiie in exterior composition; also plaster for interior only. the decorators svpply Со. odd brackets, corbels, urns, Етс. Ычм- abacvs face abacvs ber. width. width. projection. drop. style. remarks. prices. a:< % ....... % in. % i . renaissance ............................................ $ . % ‘ " " % ” romanesque ............................................ . * " “ % ” “ renaissance ............................................ . “ % ” “ % “ “ ornamental volute ............................ . “ “ “ i “ “ ornamental volute ............................. . i“ “ % “ " “ ornamental volute ............................. . }; “ “ “ ;“ “ .............................................. . / “ “ “ ,'/à “ “ similar to cut ................................ . " И " " “ “ similar to cut ................................ . % “ % “ % " “ similar t cut ................................ . l % ‘i ,l “ “ “ similar to cut, abacus on back ................. . i :i ‘ “ “ “ similar to cut, ornamental volute, and abacvs. . .. . / " / " % “ “ similar t cut, ornamental volute ............... . g “ % “ ” ; “ “ similar to cut ................................ . % “ “ % “ “ similar to cut, ornamental volute ............... . % “ И “ % “ “ similar to cut, ornamrnatl volute ............... . “ ” o “ “ “ ............................................ . % ” % ” % ” % “ “ ............................................ . % “ % " “ % “ “ ............................................ . % “ / " “ ” " similalr to cut, abacus on back ................ . “ “ " “ “ ............................................ . % ^ % " % “ . " " ............................................ . ‘i % u % и п “ double face .................................. . % Н %: l; /ii :‘ .......................................... . / Н u h % ‘ triple face ................................... . Ц и ‘f u ” ............................................ . x % u u % и ; n “ ........... , ................................. . - “ ............................................ . “ “ “ ............................................ . * % % %“ " _" .................. ¿ .............. . ..... _ ....................... colonial base , height , extreme proj. ” ............ . in. in %; in. m semi-classic ............................................ . % % “ % “ % “ “ similar to cut ................................ . i l % “ “ “ “ similar to cut ................................ . 'l % “ “ “ renaissance similar to cut ................................ . % l % “ “ % “ “ similar to cut ................................ . l “ " “ “ similar to cut ................................ . l % " “ " “ e similar to cut .............................. . / “ / “ / “ “ simialr to cut, triple bracket .................. . ” ' “ и “ “ ............................................ . : % “ ....... / “ % “ gothic. ............................................ . “ ....... % ” % “ “ ............................................ . * ..... _ ....... _ ....... ......... colonial base ", height , extreme proj. %” ......... .@ in. in % . % in renaissance ............................................ . ;/ ‘ ‘ ‘ ’ “ ‘ “ similar to cut, no bottom drop ................. . * “ % “ % “ И ” “ similar to cut, no bottom drop ................. . ” ‘ ” ” " semi-classic ............................................ . % “ % “ “ “ renaissance same as cut, double face ....................... . g % % g “ “ ............................................ . _ / " " ............................................ . “ ‘ ” " “ “ ............................................ . а" gli “ ” “ “ classic ............................................ . % i % n ” ............................................ . u % n ‘ % “ “ ............................................ . % / % " / “ “ ............................................ . Ё “ sy“ ` /“ d bif „ “ o е a e .................................. . § ? % “ ” ” iii; “ “ plaliln abaîzus .......................... : ...... . . l % % % “ “ plain abacus ................................. . ',­ % ‘ ” “ plain abacus ................................. . * ‘; “ “ % “ % “ “ plain abacus ......................... ‘ ........ . ', “ “ ” % " “ ornamental abacus. top and back .............. . a ! " у; “ “ ‘ ' “ “ ornamental abacus, top and back .............. . b “ “ “ “ “ ............................................ . * € % “ “ “ % “ “ ............................................ . % “ % “ % ‘x' “ renaissance ............................................ . " % “ % “ % “ “ ......................................... . . / ” " " % “ “ ............................................ . % “ %; “ % “ : " “ ............................................ . . / r / g' “ “ ...... ............................... . , í “ “ . о ottom ea ............................... . % “ % ” “ ,'á “ “ no bottom leaf ............................... . “ % “ . “ ” " no bottom leaf ............................... . * % “ " % “ “ “ ............................................ . “ % “ % " % “ “ ............................................ . “ “ % “ “ “ ............................................ . " ‘ “ ‘f’ “ "ë/ “ “ double face .................................. . g “ “ Ё i “ “ “ ............................................ . “ “ “ ” " ............................................ . " “ % “ “ “ abacus on back ............................... . % “ % “ “ % “ “ double face .................................. . % % ‘ ’ “ “ “ double face .................................. . % “ “ “ ............................................ . a ‘# “ " “ %’ “ “ ............................................ . s % “ % “ “ “ “ double face .................................. . % ” r( “ “ % “ “ ............................................ . * ............................ colonial base ", height %”, extreme proj. И”... . . . .. . * ............................ louis xvi base ”, height ”, extreme proj. %” .......... . * :o ............................. colonial base ”, height ”. extreme proj., %” ......... . * cut on opposite page. numbers following similar in appearance. should above printed descriptions be insulïìcient, write for designs. above made in exterior composition; also plaster for interior only. t НЕ decorators svpply Со. y@ the decorators svpply co. odd brackets. corbels, etc. nvm- abacvs top face bottom projec ber. width. width. face width. tion. drop. style. remarks. prices. * in. in. ..... . in. renaissance plain abacus ............. $ . “ " ..... “ “ “ plain abacus ............. . “ “ ..... “ “ “ “ “ ............. . * “ ” in. “ “ louis xvi ......................... . “ " “ “ “ ornamental abacus ....... . “ “ " “ " ........................ . “ “ “ i “ “ ........................ . “ “ " “ “ ........................ . a “ ” “ i “ “ ........................ . * “ ” " “ “ louis xvi ........................ . " " ...... " “ ....................... . “ “ ...... “ “ ......................... “ “ in. “ “ ......................... . “ " “ “ “ ......................... . * “ " ...... " “ louis xvi ........................ . ” “ ...... "‘ “ “ ........................ . “ " “ “ ........................ . “ “ " " ........................ . “ “ ...... “ “ “ ........................ . a “ “ ...... “ “ “ ........................ . в “ “ ...... “ “ “ ........................ . * “ “ ...... “ “ romanesque ........................ . “ “ ...... “ “ “ plain face ............... . “ “ ...... Н “ “ “ “ .............. . * “ " in “ “ louis xvi ......................... . “ “ “ “ “ “ without festoon .......... . “ “ “ “ “ “ with festoon ............. . “ ............ “ “ louis xv ......................... . “ ............ “ " “ circular abacus ........... . * i “ ` m ...... “ “ louis xvi ........................ . “ “ ...... ‘ “ ........................ . “ “ “ “ ........................ . ” ” ...... ” “ ........................ . " “ in. i “ “ ........................ . a “ " ...... " “ ........................ . b ‘ ” “ “ ........................ . * “ “ “ “ “ louis xvi ........................ . * “ “ ” “ '“ ........................ . * " ............ “ ` gothic ........................ . “ ............ “ “ ........................ . “ ............ “ ‘ ........................ . “ ............ “ " ........................ . “ ............ ‘ “ ........................ . * ...... ............ “ ........................ . .................. “ plain .................... . ...... in ............ “ ........................ . * _ . “ ...... " louis xvi ........................ . “ “ “ “ ........................ . * ...... " “ “ “ greek ........................ . ...... ” “ “ “ ........................ . * in. “ ‘ " " classic ........................ . ...... ...... “ " “ ........................ . in in. “ “ ........................ . * “ ” ” “ art nouveau ........................ . * cut on opposite page. numbers between similar. should above printed description be insuñ'icient, write for designs. above made in exterior composition', also plaster for interior only. Т НЕ decorators svpply Со. гм lil- r АР y С f Е":'-\!СС "Б А.) я с'ч “—'С‘.._...__.._.. -. . the decorators svpply co. the decorators svpply С . the decorators svpply co. odd brackets. bottom aeacvs top face face pro- number. width. width. width. jection. drop. style. remarks. prices. * in. in. ...... in. in. renaissance ......................... $ . “ " ...... ' " " " ......................... . “ “ ...... " “ " ......................... . “ “ ...... " “ " ......................... . “ “ ...... “ " “ .......................... . “ “ ...... “ " " ......................... . ";l " “ ...... “ " " ......................... . “ “ ...... “ " “ ......................... . “ “ ...... “ " “ ......................... . ” “ ” ‘ ” ......................... . a “ “ ...... “ “ “ ......................... . “ “ ...... “ “ “ ......................... . * “ “ ...... ” “ classic ......................... . * “ “ ...... “ " “ ......................... . “ “ ...... “ “ “ ......................... . “ “ ...... " " “ ......................... . * “ “ ...... “ " renaissance for " square column ....... . * ...... “ in “ “ louis xv ......................... . * “ ...... “ “ art nouveau ......................... . * ” ” ...... “ “ " ......................... . ...... “ ...... ‘ ` “ ......................... . * in “ ...... “ “ roman for column ”x ” ...... . “ “ ...... “ " “ for column ”х ”....... . * “ . “ ...... ‘ “ elizabethan ......................... . * “ “ in io “ “ louis xvi ......................... . ...... ” ...... " “ ” ......................... . * “ ...... “ /“ greek ......................... . “ “ ...... “ “ “ ......................... . * “ “ ...... “ “ renaissance ......................... . * “ “ ...... “ “ classic ......................... . ‘ “ ...... “ ‘ “ ornamental face.. . . . . Й‘ " “ in. ” “ louis xvi .....: ................... . “ i “ “ io “ " “ ......................... . * ...... “ ...... ” “ “ ......................... . * iii “ in “ “ renaissance ......................... . *cut on opposite page. numbers similar in appearance. should above printed description be insquicient, write for designs. above made in exterior composition; also plaster for interior only. the decorators svpply Со. ss. the decorators svpply co. cement vases, balustrad es and columns. vases. nv.\ ~ height. extreme base ­ _ ber. diam. width. style. remarks. prices. * in. in. in. louis xvi ................................................ $ . * " } ” “ classic .. ........................................... . * " o “ “ “ ........................................ . . _ . " “ } “ ” ................................. .. ‚ ‚. .. . . * } “ “ “ louis xvi ................................................ . balustrade. nvm ber. height. thickness. length. style. remarks. prices. * in. } in. } in. classic ................................................ . * ” } “ “ english ................................................ ...... “ } “ colonial pedestal height over all ” and " square at the die ..... pedestal, $ . top rail, $ . . bottom rail, $ . per foot. baluster, $ . each. column. nvm- height. dia.\i. at dia.\i. at base ber. neck. base. width. style. ' . remarks. prices. * ’ ”. } in. } in. in. doric .......................................... $ . ’ “ ” “ “ ...................................... .. . all above articles cast in portland cement. *cu-t on opposite page. numbers between similar in appearance. should above printed description be insuñicient. write for designs. the decorators svpply r oo t НЕ decorators svpply co. odd brackets and stair brackets. nvm- abacvs top face bottom pro_iec~ rer. width. width. face width. tion. drop. style. remarks. prices. * ; in in. ...... l in. i in renaissance ....................... . * “ " ...... ” l " roman ....................... . * i “ “ ...... “ q “ renaissance ................... . * § “ “ ...... ; ‘ " ....................... . * è “ % “ ...... ” " ....................... . “ iâ“ ...... “ } ` “ ....................... . § ” i “ ...... Н ” ” ....................... . * `ì “ ) ‘ ...... i “ “ roman ....................... . * га “ " ...... } i “ renaissance ....................... . " %“ ...... %“ i“ “ ....................... . “ i“ ...... }” “ " ....................... . g ” ” ...... i ” } “ “ ....................... . * i “ l “ ...... “ “ classic ....................... . * ...... “ ...... “ % “ art nouveau ....................... . * } l ...... “ “ louis xvi ....................... . * %“ “ ...... “ г “ " ....................... . * k “ “ in % “ “ “ ....................... . * ...... “ ...... i “ ” renaissance ....................... . * i in “ ...... ;! “ , ; “ empire ....................... . * i ‘ “ ...... “ g “ renaissance ....................... . * i ” “ ...... i ” " “ ....................... . * “ ............ } “ " gothic ....................... . * ...... in ...... “ , . “ renaissance ....................... . * iin. “ ...... % “ “ classic .................. . * “ % “ ...... “ i “ gothic ....................... . * “ “ ...... i* “ % “ renaissance ....................... . * ; “ il “ ...... ï “ ” “ ....................... . * ...... } “ ...... “ i “ roman ...................... . * i “ ...... “ % “ renaissance ....................... . * ” “ ...... § “ lì ” roman ....................... . * “ “ ...... i “ ; “ renaissance ....................... . * “ . “ ...... ; “ , .“ roman ....................... . * “ l “ iï in. “ “ romanesque ....................... . * .................. " l " louis xvi ....................... - . * ................. “ ‘ " ....................... .. * n ; . Ц “ l “ classic ....................... . * ...... ” ...... “ “ " ....................... . * % in. “ ...... l “ ?.v “ louis xvi ....................... ` . * } “ i “ ...... i “ “ “ ....................... . * “ “ ...... “ “ renaissance ....................... . * % “ , . “ l in “ g “ classic ....................... . * “ “ ...... “ “ renaissance ....................... . * § “ z“ ...... lo “ è “ " ....................... . * là “ i “ ...... “ “ “ ....................... . * ...... % “ ...... “ i % “ greek ....................... l . * ...... “ ...... “ % “ " ....................... . * ...... il“ ...... ? “ “ louis xvi ....................... . * ...... ì “ ...... % " } “ “ ....................... . * ...... f'. “ iâ in , “ “ classic ....................... . * ...... ì“ iâ “ i " “ ” ....................... . * ...... Е" ...... " % “ “ ....................... . * ...... Е " ...... “ i “ “ ....................... . *cut on opposite page. numbers following similar in appearance. . ­ should above printed description be insufficient, write for designs. above made in wood and composition only. the decorators svpply С . odd capitals and brackets. brackets. nvm- aracys top face bottom projec ber. width. width. face width. tion. drop. style. remarks. prices. * in. } . } in. б} in. in. classic .............................. $ . }“ “ è“ ” ” .............................. . “ } “ “ } “ } “ .............................. . * } “ ” ...... } “ } ” louis xvi .............................. . * } “ } “ ...... ” “ renaissance .............................. . * “ } “ in. } ” } “ louis xvi .............................. . * “ i “ ...... } " “ renaissance .............................. . * } " “ in. “ “ roman .............................. . * “ “ } “ } “ } " louis xvi .............................. . caps. nvmber. diameter. height. width. retvrn. style. prices. * } in. } in. ............ art nuveau ...................................... $ . * } “ “ ............ egyptian ...................................... . * ...... “ in. in. empire ...................................... . * ...... } “ } “ } “ renaissance ...................................... . * in. } “ ............ “ ...................................... . * ...... } ” } in. } in. empire ........................ , ............. . * ...... } “ “ ...... greek corner face ”, center face ”, recess г”. . . . . * } in. “ ............ gothic ...................................... . * ...... “ in. ...... “ for } columns ........................ . * cut on opposite page. numbers following similar in appearance. should above printed descriptions be insufficient, write for designs. above made in exterior composition; also plaster for interior only. above prices based on oak or birth. any other woods % extra. Т НЕ decorators svpply Со. @s »n d] и”, ‘ Ы »e ‘i "ú ~ .. v\` щ ii lf шт! i ` тми kind of goods shown herein are only a small percentage of our productions. as we embody the different articles we manufacture in separate catalogues, we have refrained from illustrating any other in this book, and therefore mention here the different branches of our manufacture, viz.: . exterior composition. . interior fibrous plaster in connection with plaster finish. . interior composition in conjunction with woodwork. . grille work. exterior composition is used very extensively for the ornamental features of build- ings. and for that purpose has taken the place of much more expensive materials. it is very durable and easily applied. combines with а very low price a very artistic finish. lts manifold uses for capitals, brackets, cornices, friezes, panels, arches, shells, and gables fill a constantly increasing demand by the professio-n. \ve can refer to a great number of fine buildings beautified by us with this class of goods. the interior decorations of public buildings, theaters, churches, and residences of to-day require a great deal of relief ornamentation for their refined finish. the manu- facture of these goods made of fibrous plaster forms a great part of our business. the immense possibility of this inexpensive material as a decorative medium has made it stand foremost in the minds of architects searching for an ornamental finish at а reasonable cost. no up-to-date building can lay claim to any architectural or deco- rative prominence without а Ь га use of this class of ornamentation in its interior. this part of our manufacture is immensely increasing as the nature of it becomes more and more understood. we can proudly claim hundreds of architects that have made use of the possibilities of these goods, and cannot say too inuch in praise of it. we have issued a special catalogue for interior ornamentations, which contains on its pages several thousand illustrations, showing every form or style of ornaments known to his- tory. we devote special catalogues to this class of work. the interior composition we have several times referred to in the preface forms quite a part of our output; when properly applied and finished, will give exactly the same results as wood carving, having the same grain; when filled represents any wood used, as oak, mahogany, birch, etc. it would deceive an expert to distinguish the fine examples of this class of goods in our show rooms from wood carvings. our thousands of models, running in style through all architectural periods known, enable us to make almost any conceivable design to imitate wood carving on interior woodwork, such as windows and door trims, sideboards, consols, mantels, etc. the v-ery fact that this material is so inexpensive has made it possible that almost any building has a liberal amount of this ornamentation distributed all over its interior wood finish. we cannot say too much of its merits as a decorative medium on woodwork, and would like to invite the trade to make a trial with it in order to be convinced. we have issued a special catalogue of fret or grille work. which has stood the criticism of the best people using this kind of ornamentation for beautifying houses. \/ve would like it understood that we aim to manufacture this article in any design and style t meet the general scheme of the interior decoration. we finish these goods in any color or wood. А fine grille is always a highly desirable ornamentation for openings between rooms. we justly lay claims to the distinction of being the foremost people in this country in the manufacture of these goods. ln conclusion, we wish to state that our range of manufacture covers almost every conceivable relief ornamentation known to the art of architecture, except in stone and metal. for this class of work we, however, furnish the models necessary. w'e respectfully invite all interested in the ornamental arts of building to visit our establishment. to be convinced that we are the largest and most advanced manu- facturers of relief ornamentation in its various branches in the united states. in presenting this catalogue to the trade, we wish to emphasize the fact that the the decorators svpply Со. we have excellent facilities for furnishing special designs quickly. estimates given on application. preface СОМРО ornaments, or imitation wood-carvings, have made for themselves a place of diver sified usefulness in ornamenting wood constructed articles, or for fine ceiling and wall decorations, to such a great extent of late years, that we feel encouraged to devote a special catalog to this class of ornamentation, which we herewith present to the trade. the illustrations in this book are taken from sample boards, photographed directly on the metal plates and half-tones made therefrom, so that the articles shown are almost as well presented to the eye as if the goods were seen. we believe to have brought out the finest collection of ornaments ever assembled to- gether in this line, and trust the illustrations will bear out this statement. we have endeavored to make said collection as comprehensive and diversified as our experience has taught us same should be, and have spared no effort, study, or expense to get together a most useful and artistic ensemble. our aim is to have models of almost every con- ceivable form or style of ornament ever designed and a number of different sizes of each. we are continually adding to our stock of new models, and any ornament not found in this book we may either have models for, or same may be procured short notice. we have a staff of competent designers and carvers working for us, making new patterns all the time. compo ornaments can be used to imitate wood carvings on all doors, windows, mantelsy consoles, and furniture of every kind and description, and readily stained to match the wood, so that no expert could be able to tell what part of the article is wood or compo. for gilded or white enameled woodwork or furniture, no better adapted or less expensive ornamentation can befound. as an ornamentation for ceilings and walls, and especially for wall panels, it has a place by itself, noted for its delicate, fine, artistic detail, and also great durability. for wall panels to be hung with silk and tapestry, the only ornamental framing adapt- able is composition on -р у veneer and ornamented wood mouldings rabbitted. see page . for ornamenting railroad and street cars, steamships, etc., compo has been exten- sively employed on account of its greater durability and fitness, being readily bent into any shape or curve. compo ornaments are almost exclusively used now in all places where wood-carvings were formerly employed. they are much less expensive, more durable, and fully as artistic, the greatest care having been bestowed in design and execution to bring about the finest results in our stock models. give compo a good try-out. when ordered from us it will show the best results. we guarantee it to endure all reasonable wear and handling and not to crack. we use only the very best material in making it. the largest and most artistic assortment of fine models are at your service, without special charge for same. our unexcelled facilities insure to you the smoothest and quickest service obtainable. the decorators supply СО. index op all ornaments si-iown round, square and oval rosettes - - - ­ _ _ panel ornaments - - _ _ _ _ _ _ shields - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ vases and shells - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ torches, musical instruments and fleur de lis ­ - - honeysuckle crestings, stair risers and bracket sides - ribbons ­ - - - - - - - - ­ figure ornaments and i-ieads - - - - — - gothic ornaments - _ - - ­ - - - - leaves - - - - ­ — - - - - drops wreaths - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ festoons - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ pilaster and panel ornaments scroll friezes ­ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ bands and honeysuckles - - _ _ _ _ _ lambs tongues - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ egg and darts - - - - _ ­ _ _ _ beads and pearls - - _ _ _ _ _ _ art nouveau (new art) ornaments louis xiv, xv, xvi french renaissance periods - - - wall panel ornaments - - - - - - - wall panel mouldings ­ ­ - - - ­ ­ - window comices - - - - - - - - door i-ieads - - ­ - - - - - - - in catalog ­ - — - - - - . - - - - - to to . to . t . to . to . to . to . to . to . to . to . to . to . to . to . to . to . to . to . to . to . to . to . - to . round and square rosettes no. ` шедшими О О О О О o `i ` si `i si si осяч / h relief ëtäk \~ о Ю\ш `›‹ \-. w» \-. œu œ. шт : ä“ _„„\m œ oë-oe. á Н.- Я “sleìî if lîël-âkîrär _d ‚ :h 'j-i »ju \__h \~ » а «À . ? “da ' i „v_ œ \.. b \­- \... фи œ` w. &~\ .— \›— .l 'u , т. si" '-’ la i-. . g‘ :r :£ x". \"" \ _m- à. \н \— \-— \-‹ ‘ #\œ~w œ\œ\ \_. _tu \.. u.. ц. ‘д и. < j-\ а? ." \›- - ‚ +` ‘b \- . _. _du и i cl'. ik `А ос style italian renaissance italian renaissance itahan renahœance enndre (iijltiiiizil gothic moorish empire italian renaissance italian renaissance colonial italian renaissance iînipire gothic (ìodnc empire flemish empire empire clasmc classic (Èlassic iîrn ire colonial colonial byzantine moorish classic italian renaissance (Ílassic classic iîiiiriire italian renaissance italian renaissance renaissance classic classic iinnpire (ìothic (iothic (hasác riunan empire ( thic iiniińre romanesque roman iînipire louis xvi louis xvi italian renaissance renaissance renaissance iî ire iînipire ronuui italian renaissance ibmnan empire roman italian renaissance iînipire roman roman roman roman roman roman iìonian i( : roman roman iìriiiiziri roman ihxnan roman (joünc (Èothic empire roman roman iiiiiiiire roman litriiiiziii roman rcwnan ronmn roman roman roman ennure iìriiiizlii renaissance (Èrcek louhsfÃvi louis xvi louw Х\Ч price each . . . . . . . . . . . . . ‚ . . . .o . . ‚об . . .oo ‚об . . . . . ‚об . . . . .o . ‚об . no. s s s s .j \— `- »a Ц И п— ‘mn’a _d s.“ и" они а œ ад ч: ‚и щ _a ц- :i .j b\ au Ь` я ”А ‘n .j \›-‹ i й i œv œ Щ Ц— -‹`- c“ ... вы в.“ n\ «.- \ - - §\oc\ »|. $i \­­ vn ь— ‘н _dl un( . u *\œ w`ä щ \›‹ м "\ ef a l» / % l l „l =ы ч œ'xůl: н \—\ы ш ь`ь‘ш„ ..д„ \›— ‘-- \.›-п "л \- \.... :i: l­\ и' @nb- ohm Ähse `b­ и j" l.“ n\ »\ И . а}. гид? \'.u ¿hi style louk Х\Ч Ьоив x\d louis xvi roman empire greek roman roman roman roman roman empire roman roman roman roman italian renaissance italian renaissance italian renaissance roman roman italian renaissance roman roman roman renaissance roman roman gothic (iothic roman roman roman classic colonial iaduis )[\ii greek art nouveau italian renaissance roman roman greek empire roman roman flemish classic italian renaissance roman roman roman louis xvi empire empire empire roman empire roman empire empire empire colonial colonial flower rossettes flower rossettes flower rossettes greek roman renahmance empire empire iiiiiiiire colonial iîiiiiiirlë art nouveau roman classic colonial a colonial classic empire empire louis` xvi moorish ilonian italian renaissance empire empire moorish empire sullivanesque colonial colonial louis xvi roman empire classic italian renaissance price each $ . . .o . . . l . . . . . . . . . п . .o . . ‚ . . . . . . . .io .io .i .io . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . _, . c . . . . pr ices su hiect t() discul'nt. the decorators supply co. ¿in ` ‚ . ЭИ ` ;. ho idb Н, shouldbe ‘í § . дюйм ьёаи round and square rosettes .iashoumaïtxßa explanation and instructions for application on page the д i _ decorators ‚ т ì supply _ с, ~` . ' ` ‘l ' co_ -° ‘ жх % ‚ y ‘i shouldbe zêvxx fhi shouldbe ИХ И oval and panel rosettes explanation and instructxons for application on page , panel ornaments no relief style price no. relief style price each each empire $ . âgé empire si lf elizabethan .so v empire . И empire . âs empire ."o Ó И empire . ¿i empire i . s так italian renaissance . И empire i . lí empire . greek . § empire la' greek . И empire . И italian renaissance zo . оо i § empire . the panel ornaments shown on opposite paqe are mounted and composed of a number of casts each. ive will furnish a pounce with the larger ones, for your guidance in mounting same. \`e have many odd ornaments and scrolls. from which we can mount a great variet)r of panels, in i_litîerent styles, forms and sizes. send for special designs and prices and give your measurements. “Ъ would advise our clients to either send us the woodwork or boards for complicated mountings, as we can much inore carefully and economically handle same in our factory. or have us make such boards or “'oodwork receiving rich ornamentation. we are well equipped in our “foodworking department `for that work. since we make all the wood parts ‘for our compo capitals~ and brackets in our own factory. prices subject to discount. the decorators supply co. шиит/+ . «le er' И; '* ' Ш и: “ Зе/адэд/в panel ornaments explanation and instructions for application on page . ТНЕ / x / :'/ ' / l .»' - sii'qxqiÍq À. . */,x /s k-< », i aß? , / x u @ .a x -'vg x у a l ` v ­v>vr a , тиши w' 'n @i shields . / х /з ‘i /.mvg itisxzsa . Уж? ses@ . _ ‘ „ Чзх и x % х , e ‘ : ’ ‘ ' : ' ”ш? decorators supply co. explanation and instructions for application on page . vases and sh el ls no relief style price no. relief style price each each :is colonial $ . ¿á louis xvi $ . . ' colonial . louis xvi . : colonial . o ¿ii colonial . - ' ' colonial . ¿s louis xvi . ‘s colonial . Н; louis xvi . . colonial .oo ¿i louis xvi . colonial . Та louis xvi l . oo ‘s colonial . sá roman . § ' colonial . ­‘ s french renaissance . colonial . ’ ' louis xvi . , colonial . ffa’ colonial . o louis xvi . В; colonial . äá colonial . ' colonial .io colonial . .'Í colonial . ¿í colonial . giá colonial . i Н french renaissance . „lâ colonial . § louis xvi . êá louis xiv . %- italian renaissance . colonial . ; colonial . ‘f french renaissance . Н colonial . louis xv . Н louis xvi . И colonial . И louis xvi . И colonial . fai colonial . louis xiv . ëá colonial .oo colonial . . louis xvi . colonial . hr colonial . ' § colonial . j.' louis xiv . И louis xvi . ' louis xvi . € louis xv . И louis xiv . И colonial . o Н colonial . sá italian renaissance . louis xvi . italian renaissance . / louis xvi . .( italian renaissance . louis xvi . giá louis xv . prices subject ТО discount. the --——-‹ ъ ‚. ' l” “ шиши - /«x / /,x / / x / smul' {gîa` l, l. l. y x / f , / » шт i Х aixîile ‚ ф ‘/: x / ' ".' /iij дн , Ъихшу @qn i Ь. i “v ФР v г; ‘ — : /exe ° вмиг/ g i s/,xíf/g / x / "h ‚и 'lf/@mm : ,/ " hx s zslsxsxls « \ [n }? А i / x ’/ 'Üb' ’jl/á и] j *i* _ «d «ff/q x / % тонн sáis : ’ik И; 'fb x » Ж /ß Ф : И”; бх / } Ж /,x / . : ‘ ?’ «ir . ”/ ”/ s e ff ‚за thur/ “t М _è ¢i> c’ ‚ wv & ”/,x / / .q v y " i _ _ i „у ‚в _ у” _ гике/я ч/ хз-г/ / - Матч/е /в- /s q~ x h qs/sxsßh „ ; " - »a torches. musical instruments, fleur de lis, etc. explanation and instructions for application on page . . % . / , .;{ / a «i *wird 'g' ‘ / / . , / / mf ß! ‘hf/@p д? " ‘ / ¿lz'fla » p ’lz z h 'n ¿_i u :/ x /z @mnh-@ms as. i decorators supply co. iqo. relief ‘ha от ‘ш (А. ‘г »\ l.“ .ò\ »al \ °зг » un \ u`\ "и \-. м -- \.-. v к... ._ \. la ¿a :l в” n" Ы Ь\ Э’ @x щ‘ . Эт н- \ы \`.. j-\ œ'. к *\ an. louis xvi ii n irc empire louis xvi colonial colonial louis xvi empire iinnńrc louis xvi . us }{\'i colonial louis xvi i§ >ire louis xvi iìnnńre ennńre ijolńs )(\'i ii n ire colonial empire louis­ xvi empire empire empire empire iìnipirc ( i lìn pire italian renaissance iînîpirc louis xvi iîrn ire prices subject ТО discount. prà? isz cl so. . . . . . . - . o . о . o ‚ .zo ‚ . . o ribbons no. relief Ъ.— жхъжцэтък КК?Ж°Ё*’Ё“Э* °‘=; ) е italian renaissance empire 'empire louis xvi itaüan ronaßsance lìn pirc linipire iìnîpire itaüan ronaksance itaüan renaùsance italian renaissance louis xvi iaduis ){\'i colonial louis xvi louis xvi iînnńre iî ire itaüan renahmance iî ire itaüan renaùsance empire ernpue ii ire itaüan renaßsance italian renaissance (Í i l empire }(\'i empire in pírc iloińs }{\Íi pńce each i 'b . . . . . . . o . . . . . . . . . . . . . .zo . . . . no. i ' relief y \*‘ \°" u -х ›\ м\ ЧМ \-- чл ` ^ «Ь œ" li Ж ~œ œ\ ‘tw _j ‚.р у “n Час \ ‚.‚ “и *\а':Ращ а w - г: ь si» figure ornaments and heads style or name empire natural owl arf, nouveau classic colonial ctńonial natural owl enuńre italian renaissance iînuńrc (hasdc linipire empire (hasúc iìeriaissaiice renahmanee classic natural “fing italuln ileriaissaiice natural “ionian natural butterfly prices subject to discount. ‘г се each i.) ij nn ij . . o . o . . [. .oo . o no. s relief iaoï л \- и. .ad ...und ua un fz ‘Ь‘ - ’r ЭГ uw :n ".»i ‘ "\ „ч ‘ln wd, v_“ об» Ь` {х style or name natural butterfly italian renaissance itaüanÍrenaßsance natural “fing natural snake iinnńre naturalsnake (Íkissic louÈsicvi louisfi\' natural bird natural bird natural bird iierahüc eagle nalurallhrd enuńre italùin ileliaissarice i oińs x louis xv italian renaissance iìinißire i’rice iuach ,» мы nl . o . . . . . ШМЮЮММ .oo . .bo . . . . . . . . .oo . .oo .oo figure ornaments, heads and gothic ornaments no. ' relief style or name price no relief style or name price each each И boy's head $ . у, german renaissance $ . ,'Ä Воу'з head . Уз natural lion . ê/à german renaissance . lí german renaissance . И cherub . âá italian renaissance . И; bo_\"s head . И gothic . boy's head . gothic . М Мап'з carieasure . И gothic . o И man’s carieasure . о / gothic . o И louis xv . gothic . И \'отап' head . И gothic . ëf's cherub . sii gothic . И german renaissance . § n gothic . . cherub . iâ gothic . zi cherub . gothic . lion's head . - lí italian . ’ lion's .head . lí gothic . % lion's head . ‚И gothic . if.; cherub . ŕ; italian renaissance . cherub . o И gothic . cherub . gq’ gothic . И lion's head . “; gothic . if lion's head . § gothic . . / lion's head . gothic . § cherub . gothic . И; Ь оп`$ head . И gothic . ifi ram's head . § gothic . , i lion's head . ' gothic . И cherub . / gothic . , cherub . § gothic . german renaissance . § gothic . § lion's head . § gothic . gothic . gothic . i man's caricature . И gothic . И lion's head ` . ё-в gothic. . sá lion's head . ; gothic . lé louis xv . %» _ gothic . И louis xv . ,lf gothic ` . И man's caricature . о ` gothic . И boys head . И gothic . prices subject to discount. leaves no. relief style price no. reuep style price of overhang u ’ leaf each of overhang of leaf each on top on top {к louis xvi so . “; ‘fá romanesque $ . o И l; louis xvi . ‘в empire . fi là empire .o :'á ' empire . o ,'.Í i ’ louis xvi ‚ М {д empire . ,la empire . И ' gothic . И greek . :'á ¿i empire . ‚ italian renaissance . ‘ empire . ' ' greek . ’; И; louis xvi . И ‘í empire . i ‘ ' ’ greek . И v italian renaissance . { ‚Ч italian renaissance . , roman . у“: louis xvi . § és greek . ‚ ; louis xvi . § roman . ,' italian renaissance . #if greek . ;' empire . $ ' ¿a french renaissance . o {к ’á italian renaissance . {Я} И italian renaissance . o la’ За italian renaissance . § greek . ’s romanesque . . louis xvi . ‘s “s italian renaissance . . romanesque . .. . , louis xvi . % °.; louis xvi . ) ' ‘í (ìreek . °.; ;; louis xvi . И italian renaissance . И И; renaissance . { И greek . êí italian renaissance . o it; italian renaissance . ,' ’ italian renaissance . , empire . % И renaissance . Н italian renaissance . И И italian renaissance . lf; З‘х gothic . ; z {Ед louis xvi . {а lâ romanesque . ,is empire . o #n ‘á louis xvi . . louis xvi . ’i Ц italian renaissance . % ’ empire . ‘í louis xvi . ; french renaissance . о ' И louis xvi . И ¿s italian renaissance . ‚ад ‘á roman . И И italian renaissance . И roman . fr; italian renaissance . о ,'ís Ь’з roman . g lí; italian renaissance . i s l( italian renaissance . до ¿i И italian renaissance . И italian renaissance . И italian renaissance . )i italian renaissance . ¿v italian renaissance . fg И greek . ‘a И italian renaissance . prices subject to discount. the decorators supply СО. . " x @ » ‚ v s _ sÍ'sÉÃÖs/e'jëî'xjm )* ”> ' : / “ .>-iíì-ÈÈ iÃui' ’eà' .y ` uxzs/ ¿it/ "“ гика», " ? ` ‘lf/ x @ wsrf/ / x 'Íi 'it/ x / " / ` «§ » dbnl '@ к . '/„x ‘i ’le ‘la Х И; esÄò - м ' Í ' ` ` esso З leaves explanation and instructions for application on page . no. “ () ( (› rehef of Ох'сгЬапк relief on Тор так .' .'v l % \— к \ w ů l n д—р-‘Ьп-пц.‘ i cj w dulunub 'a . \­‘ \- ‘ ¿s ° \," œ. об. . и“ à \"' \— Ь\ bs \— ¿l \ -\ \-. \»-‹ \— `— \— \— \ l www .“ \— \- \- \... И ¿'\ : zi“- 'jh И : в» \'­‘ ‘il \-— \s| _i _d \›‹ \— "- в: ‘ вы}: œ\°ga “a“œ ­\x. ëëä? \­¢ \— \`— ё\ и §\ style r enissant. е italian renaissan ‘e italian renaissance roman annan italian renaissance itaüan renaußance italian renaissance gothic ltaüan renaßsance louis xvi louis xvi itahan renaùsance renaissance l{enaßsancc classic roman romanesque italian empire romanesque louis xvi louis xvi r nnan (ìreek roman roman roman roman rinnan rxnnan roman roman roman roman classic classic classic classic classic classic italian renaissance classic italian renaissance rennan roman renaissance italian italian louis xvi empire rinnanesque romanesque iïtiiiiirc natural italian renaissance ronmn rinnan roman ianÚspcv louis xv louis xv iinipire natural prices subject to discount. price each $ . . . . . ‘l . . . . . . . o . . . . . . . . o . . . . .oo . . . . . o . . . . . . . . . . . .o . . . .o .o . . . . . . .o . . . . . . . leaves no. ( n relief ot (lverliang relief on 'l op ‘ ’ % l l il# \ .. ц... \— - b œ~ \ ’ i “u ' ц- à’\ i -‹ \Ь‚ qq \-— \!и и `~| 'n \ ‚.. ~ т и «l u`~ œ Н œ œ x. - \­­ о. u \г-. s.. \.-. их am œ. С .j »\p\xsat# m ш œ» u\ \.. \-- ".- \и \_ \‹ Н l-i »n `-‹ \`›‹ .n н\ к: «s _l \ull \ lll ‘ lll n‘\ u\ :Ä {и На \›-‹ is œ. d style piattiirxil natunú (lasńc classic classic classic classic (hasńc classic classic (ikissic classic (hague moorish (Назло natural oak natural oak empire empire empire empire empire natural oak natural oak classic classic classic (hasác classic (Пакте (iothic i.oins )(\' (Äasńc classic classic classic classic classic classic classic classic classic classic iinnńre empire iînipire italian renaissance empire itahan renabwance romanesque annanesque romanesque iîniińre italian renaissance iîn pire ronuuumquc romanesque loubÃx\w_ italian renaissance itaüan renahsancc romanesque greek italian renaissance renaissance price each $ . . . . . . .o .o .o . . . .o . . . . . . o . o . о . . . . o . . . o . . . . . . . . . . . . o . . . o . . o . . . . . . . . . . . o . n . ; prices subject t() relief ot­ (поташ: .`. `l b мы 'j x ’n \'j\ t» relief style greek greek (ireek (ireek greek greek greek greek greek (ireek greek greek greek italian renaissance italian renaissance italian renais | : relief ` \_ . д - м и Ь\ ьх + »\ e“ ü“ œ Ф style empirel louis xvi empire louis .\'\'i empire empire louis xvi louis xvi louis` xvi louis xvi louis xvi italian renaissance empire louis xvi louis xvi empire empire empire empire louis xvi louis` xvi louis xvi empire empire prices subject to discount. price each . . o .zo ‚ ‚ . . . o . . o , . o . . . () . . ‚ . ) ‚ .. wreaths no. . relief И и и style empire empire empire empire empire empire renaissance empire empire empire louis .\'\'l empire empire louß Х\Ч empire empire empire empire empire empire empire louis xvi louis xvi price each $ . . . . o .zo . .oo .qo . . . . . ulg-qlu o .zo . . . . . . th e decoratcrs supply co. wreaths explanation and instructions for application on page . the . l?? deco rato rs_ supply СО . ‘iq тетю а s , - . .` -` :ñ f ax? м __ :_v ` alllargc wreaths .gr ‚ ' are composed of \ y »_ . ' . „а ` д: - several casts. «a ` y io ’iqxqs/ ‘ °st / /qx v: ' / x / ` ' */,xshg wreaths explanation and instructions for application on page . i festoons no. relief style price per no. relief style price per lineal foot lineal foot И adams so . И colonial so . ‚Ё: colonial . ê'á french renaissance . italian renaissance . И empire . - louis xvi . И colonial . И empire . colonial . ¿á colonial . И colonial . И empire . colonial . empire . ,' ’ colonial . ŕ; colonial . fl.; colonial . И colonial . И colonial . И french renaissance . И colonial . о ~ ’ modern renaissance . И colonial . И modern renaissance . И empire . ŕ; modern renaissance . o И colonial . g И modern renaissance . И empire . colonial . °; colonial . " .; colonial . i ' colonial . l german renaissance . prices subject to discount. the a' ' `­ .alai/zxá"~ ч бихё въхзт v er». .v ‚ п " : ': . ‘­ festoons deco rators supply СО. all lengths print- ed on plate arc measured from cen- ter to center of drop. all large festoons are com- posed of s e v e ra l casts. , explanation and instructions por application on page . the decorators supply СО. all lengths print- ed on plate are measured from center to center of drop. length and d r о р of festoons can be changed when mounting same. all large ornaments shown on this page are composed of separ- ate ornaments. pestoons, v a s е s, torches, etc.. are sent separate as s a m е cannot be handled in mount» ing as one piece. ' no. relief А él lí / % li style price per lineal foot french renaissance colonial colonial italian renaissance italian renaissance empire french renaissance french renaissance $ . . . _ . ,per fes. . o " s. ‘ й i pestoons explanation and instructions for application on page . no. reliet­ style И empire ' ‚ , impire % empire i colonial И empire ; empire i ’ modern renaissance flemish prices subject to discount. f 'vr-u price per lineal foot $ . . . . . . . . _‘ _ Ед! .il —` the l price mounted on ì -pl_v wood no. relief style price each. panels, each. И empire $ . $ . И italian renaissance i . ‚со И italian renaissance . . explanation and instructions for application on page . pllaster panels no. relief И И \’ m l` :c n e.. f in price mounted on _ -р у wood style price each. panels. each. empire $ . `$ . italian renaissance .co . prices subject to discount. decorators supply СО. the pil а s t e r ornaments shown here are shipped in many separate casts. “Ъ will furnish apounce for mounting s a rn е— but would recom- mend to send pilas- ters for mounting to our factory, or have ns make the pilasters. -Í\ *i* fn' is~ i* - ­ ‚.аъ‘ ` i: с d ' ¿gv p ­'.f' д" r k y?. l .l' ° panel ornaments no. relief style price no. relief style price _ each each ‚И renaissance s .оо т'; empire . ". ya.; moorish . И empire . И renaissance . ^ empire . oo ‘_ % empire . И louis xvi . о ~ так romanesque . И empire . oo i“ i); italian renaissance . o ¿i louis xvi . {в italian renaissance .oo И empire .oo ¿a , И romanesque . o ' И empire . j И empire ~ . И empire . ' И empire . И italian renaissance . _ moorish . И italian renaissance . i ŕ; gothic . h italian renaissance .so ‚. И empire . v; italian renaissance . j И renaissance .оо fá italian renaissance . _ " И empire . И louis xvi . i ' êfá elizabethan . И german renaissance . о l the larger ornaments shown on opposite page are composed of several casts to facilitate the mounting. we would recommend to our clients i : send panels for complicated mountings to our factory. . . l" i prices '_subject «_to"ŕ discount. ‘Ã’ о . . , ’. .› u the decorators supply co. a f* l ` a. „ь .- .!„x / 'w /.x /e а. #- v i.. ) a panel ornaments explanation and instructions for application on page . no. ° k i relief ŕŕì` »\ КХЖКФЁЁФХХЁККЖЁ-ХЭК‘ spandrlls and panel ornaments st yle empire empire louis xv louis xv moorish moorish moorish moorish moorish empire empire natural rose french renaissance natural rose conventional rose conventional rose french renaissance italian renaissance italian renaissance italian renaissance renaissance romanesque romanesque louis xvi louis xvi italian renaissance italian renaissance prices subject to discount. price each $ . . no. relief ii it И И А 'х › ' И zt А s” х И” ¿i i И si эй bí т'ц У ¿i И . il: ii ‘/= И if lí style figure spandrils figure spandrils louis xvi louis xvi louis xvi louis xvi ­ louis xvi louis xvi italian renaissance italian renaissance louis xvi italian renaissance colonial french renaissance italian renaissance italian renaissance italian renaissance empire french renaissance greek german renaissance louis xvi german renaissance louis xvi french renaissance empire louis xvi „о the decorators supply СО. а . »exif - ? ( er ios/qxiulsîl ” - gaagax ` “s '. ‘ ›.‚ тай / х / ` ' f. . läßt . тёл e i ж ' x @ i a . щ fis/ms“ \ «из ' г а?" s :î'iäàb ê' щж ` :/gxâsftf ‘_ x ’la ' х *lg */s х ’fs ŕ *i `­ f( ‚ ‚ зме- ’ "! spandrils and panel ornaments explanation and instructions for application on page th e lv-vvfŕ ‚ decorators supply co. / . / panel ornaments explanation and instructions for application on page . _ the decoratorÈ supply ca . Лёд/ : : tti» v ß~`„ x тат : . . бз/охзз/З ‘ - х` ` ‚` ‘ „ ‘~ ` аза" к‘ж^ё - 'm _ ' ‘ ' ” х ~"/­. 'v h­ к sv: î ‘ - /.x /l panel ornaments explanation and instructions for application on page . the decorators supply cq v / ! — /. / : : ! / / .‘ /БХ / М,“ —. _ y _ . /: / `Íß'vzlíîvg ` . @ß a i ч y y ` n f y ` ~ ' x ”в y "/ x ’fs : ” „r х i : x , q sxggs ‘ii/ x ‘i / x ’!вХ / х , . l а panel ornaments ‘.' д explanation and instructions for application on page . the no. relief И И É т‘: ñ И /= :h И И И : i style price per font french renaissance french renaissance italian renaissance italian renaissance german renaissance german renaissance louis xvi adams louis xvi italian renaissance italian renaissance uis louis xvi $ n l. i. ~ 'scroll friezes \ style price' per foot empire . italian renaissance i . louis xvi . italian renaissance . italian rem-ii sance . french renaissance . italian renaissance i . o empire ’ i . о louis xvi . italian renaissance . french renaissance . louis xvi . louis xvi i . decorators supply СО. the larger orna- ments shown „lon this page are composed of sev- eral casts to facili- tate the топт- ing. we 'would recommend to our clients to s e n d panels for compli- cated mountings lo our factory. explanation and instructions for application on page . prices subject to discount. no. ' rehef is % % style price per foot (heek $ . italhn l{eruńssanee . (ìreek ‚ (Ёгсск . (Ёгеек . (Èrcek . llcnnrisli . )ioorish . moorish ` . moońsh . moorish . ó )ioorish . o ­\~loorisl . moorish . i{enaßsancc . moońsh . celtic ` . louis xvi greek . (ìreek . (sreck . louis xv . louis xv . louis xv . louis xv f . colonial . (Зе с . (Эгсск . greek . (ireek . (brock . (Èreck . (ìreek . greek . (Èreck . prices subject to discount. bands no. s relief ‘rl-Ä ‘и in' ьхцр} \щи к... и i Чд‘ *\ ‚. _\....'ь.\>н ни! $è­á" ­\-wvœ,œ ¿mi? \~ Миф» \-с lì :p l? \­­ \-. ­~ сах И“ М styh (jreek g re¢l k (ireek g reek louß.x\ louis x \' i (breek egypńan ronuul g ree k renaissance colonial colonial coknual colonial colonial coknńal colonial coknnal colonial greek (ìothic louis xvi iaduis }(\ii louis xvi louis xvi louis xvi colonial colonial colonial colonial coknńal colonial colonial ronuui price per foot, $ . . ‚ . . c . . . . . . . . . . . o . o . . . o . . . . . . . . . o . . . . o . the .,l ` . ’ ï ‘lv ч f nf l Г ` “диктанты; .fr ` г“ ì , ‘ „ i / шутят ' шЛье` v . , книжники“! i s ` ' / f" Р’г _y ‘uuu ‚А на nu“ - . » _ эх. ‘Èiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii “а ппнппппппппппвп | h; aa. la ‘lz/ ; @ ‘ih/ s l .d l y v #in i l. да . „*f; .ww-¿_at__ 'i"/„, „wy `j^` ` ‚ ‘is/ / h( imke / ` не ”в , i‘i де Ц ‘п bands eÁlanation and instructions for application on`page> . ‘ _ : o v, 'll'kÍlÍmlll'lÍno ‘nm Ílll'lll'lîlîl'illlo ÍÍk'ÍÍi ппкпптппо "n" llllllllîlllmû [rml ; % n/ the l / i ‘ i decorators supply co. ~__ ` ьз the шт ­ ’/ ЁЁ<Ё><ЁЖЁЁ<ЁЭЕЁКЁ / ооооо' Г/о ì i*i‘­"i^ `i^i ' > % h каш m“ эвпччччстпичтчгтп ; —\ А\‚А\ А\‚ d\ »q l\ a\_ ‘i / ’i 'Ь\_‚А чА\ А\_‚А\ iil l ”/ decorators supply СО. Ё */ i) u #masps дс-мв—ив-цв—ив „rasee ‚ “км . усищи-пшяннлгпачпг Б-ЁЕЕЁЁЁЭЁТЧЕБЁЁБЁБ з/ m „ . m' w;‘_‘ âëgäëärëëßgâiääŕîî i ‚ :'/ l . /q , Í". “axa т bands and stem mouldings explanation and instructions for application on page . v.wazap ‘m ¿ yaan ‘Á ßaie а. г ' , ' ’ ‘fl s "'/s l', ’l "/ ‘lf/ vvv` „ - v „ efÈeeÉfefteeefe /, /a 'hi/îg mm , к. iqo. rciiuÍ ‘l ' ik is ‘n _a \~­l .- — ь титан,” .— НЫММПКЗОЕМАМЕМТЗ and style priœ per foot empire . art nouveau . ¿xn nouveau . art nouveau . jän nouveau . louis Х \'i . empire . italian renaissance . iiniińre empire . louß Х\Ч ‚ empire . iî »irn\ . n empire . () empire . iinipire . empire . itaüan renahßnnee . o louis xvi . o louis xvi . б [‚Оъйз ){\'i . o empire . italian renaissance . ronuui . empire . iinipire . isnipire . italian renzißsunce . empire . () empire . iaöius }(\’i . iin pire . prices subject t() discount. no. bands relief? i , l / ik \­­ \.- т Ö\ “ähäleîe : ъэцгццэъ st уи- price per foot louis xvi $ . louis­ xvi . art nouveau . art nouveau . o jän nouveau . iajuis }(\'i . laauis )c\'i ‚ (Ёе с . romanesque . o romanesque . o ronuuußque . o empire . Кмппапезцие . romanesque . german renaissance . o renaissance . arabkui . arabian . german renaissance . moorish . suihvanesque . suihvanesoue . ehzabethan . iiüzaiœthan .h german renaissance .o eüzabethan . iîhzabethan . iîhzabethan . (rüde . Äioorhńi ‚ Áioornńi . moorish . ТНЕ :" / ì' ` йджжжйт > . , l è. йдчидгдддгид " l ’ls мат” f ч Гм " ¿fs v зчоо »s ¿¢¿«e_ f ‘i чадами-ваш: */ . г */ ¿f ff äf нм / t ‘: sacs з /s ч. азоддпъ? nos " mv ~ ‘www У am / ~ А ‚ .r ‘i . ' Ё: : i ‘. -" - `\›\›\›\›\‚\„.\‚\‚‚ _ % ‘/'­' / “ « : И: '/e running ornaments and bands explanation and instructions for application n page . СО. t* два» vfávj . . :à о a» f' y ' / w“ _“- »- er- ‘lâ/ % i “lo »ih i l . > ". . ‚‹ ’lg decorators supply bands and friezes no. relic( style price per foot no. relicí style price per foot %- sullivancsque $ . И arabian $ sullivancsquc r . oo efi arabian . И celtic . ŕ; moorish . И celtic . т" moorish . И: moorish . o И; sullivancsque .Óo И celtic . o moorish . o ,'s celtic . ‚ gothic . i Сети . т‘д moorish x . ; romanesque . ; arabian . the larger ornaments `ire empire iinuńre classic empire empire iînuńre empire empire classic (hasńc empire classic empire iînuńre lìnuńre iînuńre iìiiiiiire iînuńre empire price per foot $ . . . . . . o . . . . . . . o . . . . . . . “ie would recommend to our clients to lam bs tongue mou i_.dings n . relief style price per foot il'; roman $ . )s roman . i ‘ roman . gtcci( ‚ l: greek . { greek . ¿a greek . greek . И empire . ,la roman . greek . :is roman . ,lx empire . й greek . g renaissance . )s roman . . classic . -; ‘ renaissance . j.. roman . roman . , roman . в roman . g roman . ’д roman . § roman . roman . greek . ffii classic . greek . ‘á greek . ,' ' greek ‚ Н classic . ¿is roman . .' greek _ ‘ ; greek . а“, roman . ,' greek . ‚ renaissance . io roman . à; roman . roman . ) greek . И italian renaissance . р Ё (empire . Н к с ; _‚ сс v' . б) ' i ggg? älassic . ’ v ) Р; “А. ' › ‚ oman . i ' ‘i f { roman . le В. ' ged“ lw #a greek . _ ¿if/ l@ Ю уди greek . _ it” ъ ' .' ; greek . ¿v Зн roman . — . „а, roman . ' bja@ :il romlan . ‚ Ё {д -i gree ' . v г А п в roman . _ euch) fg; h, (iâreek . : ?) ‚до “_ oman . _j classic .go l w renaissance . ’ (vireek . x' Н greek . . „y . т? ‘ ' roman . e "' ‚З; grec-î . u д gree ' . ­ к roman . , „ будь Ъ? ‚ greek . ? ‘ ' renaissance . д; b- gg* ‚в qfeŕilr - бэее am . п (lassic . . % classic . " % italian renaissance . Д, _ greek. . m "т ¿a roman . {д roman _ . у? § ; , ¿talizltçn renaissance . б к ‚ — п `»ree . ‘<': " : j qw l è.' 'i в?” ,u roman . è? ь jj ч ‚.— ö ’ % renaissance . st “ u . roman . ¿tze . х n , greek . 'ab' Ё? ’v ‘l s greek . а ", ` — ‘s greek . и; Е #n roman _ . ÖÖyo _ . 'i д,- Ёздм ‚ italian irìenatssance . ì jb. ­ ta ian enaissance . ' ß.` ’ t.. ‚ empire . .~ @jgö ­ y Ё ' i italian renaissance . «i ’ñ it'ili'in r nais n l ‘ " " ‘ч italian rgniiisïiingï n v в” ‘ . . . ч: . ’d i Н italian iâenaissance . ', ,f j 'i ta ian enaissance . .ë 'a Í i »i , t ' " . f . „ : .iii s“ . - v; roman . , ч f ' ’ À“ .. . . roman . - с ‚"" - и; ` '_ l italian renaissance ” . б) ‘í empire . if.; i. n; °; (.lassic . [ ,f classic . , Пиано . ä' w т’д classic . .z ' ‘i classic . М" ‚ . t ab g q #a greek . °“° ф ‘ я italianklîelnaissance . ­ Ё ouis ' ` . a “‘ if; (freek xw' i . ' ”С, .outs . ' . f ‚ ' ron an . Ё '" the accompanyingr ydesign snows the sections of all the compo mouldings. those sliowri in conjunction with wood illustrate how same should bc used and applied. \ е do not turnish the wood unless specially ordered. prices subject to discount. the flu-lw“- ми _f *lÃ-¿l . , nm..„;..,m,„§..¿„,;w. .wwr y?. g.. .. ‘im’ i “и“? ' ‘ läßt@ “Фти этими l ¿n.însmwrwßmv-z _.”- у у __,... _. . ... -an ‘smm Ь мм `lil/lv i .a - .n_n- - ч. и-и—.ьч-—нчн-—г-—__-яч-— . „.— lambs tongue mouldings explanation and instructions for application on page . i «шаткими l г decorators supply СО. the decorators supply Í д ”пуху/тж?" ' l y ` i з ` .t Ь СО. час-пави—иоио d и ' ‘l "- “— ‚ „ ‘ . may ‚аспид—почищен. g f ‘i’ mw i v„ „ma“ l ’lxgles “Í x >Í . ' ‘ a ¿más ядх :jl/. /. / а : / п : ? /. ‘ _ ’mf/ ‚. »srv/, v ‘.БА„ /„ / /, / )fs/ sf: ffa/ ’lg z sh; БЛя :nr-’lm ì / / l afm?! ‚ i ‘n z “ s i / / \ ‘my/ , l / , х / ì i з ’wxs/su l i z/ x lg, l /: /fs . v / j¢"‘/|¢ y. „ l )mxn/: > .vf/ „ v v ’ymxî/qb _ /_ :х‘/ "wala/m' „ß/„va „___-...___- ’luf/ то ‘ z за с ’fg x И; ‚ „да/„ . / ', j / / »wxs/,u ’an :zb/ r, ` axn/ “ : ? ’virzì/ / xv: l l (d титаны/и. ш... „сын ново: -annua- . . ”. _. v_ l . / ‚ ”Лайки ’ А / / y# ,», uäŕiq„r è §î­­§§ §§f~ * an, ¿e? " uî:;;;­­ мху” ‚т„„ _ _ЁЁ;;;;: w„x%„ s “А” x / : » И i /. / / Й” l : ’in l â"/xs y» ’l l : : - ‘he ì /, /: "vm - "vm : : : y i И?! “las n ‘псмщошщщм : их /„_ mnmm-»muumwu .a ` `fax-" »,y том—ос % И ”/ Щ... Ё/„хд/в. ( ‚щами—ию— ’fn )rz/s mmm Идиш ’n х “щ . ‘mls/ ‘la ’ys/n "'/mxj/:n ' ’imf/.u n/:n х if; x у; "isaza/lc "lz: z ’in f,” i ’an ‘[ z / ! ‘isaza/m “au И; zz/xe lr, z у.” ‘las - И ‘lax ‘he :Íox als А ß/„rnim ‚‚ . ‘wnju/ av . ß/,sxß/z, : . ~ 'fm ‚О’ОМ’ОО ' ; /. ' / ,oom-„jij х jl — 'lz/m f / mw». n z'fuer-‘l `~'/ns x “fie да: ï hfs: шиит...“ аЛи х “fm ‘ck-. z ' , 'lz/. z ‘_’er “in z :ln “faz l c/.u ‘lnx :i ß ” : ’fm vfl-’lf volw/:a ’sz т “ha z /z шт , - / т “ / mm ’iglu/m ‘hals/ М l /. / _ef-»ma ma :hz Í mm / / „nm Идти al", / l ì уши-(дин с: г ›‚ beads and pearls explanation and instructions for application on page . l french renaissance ornamentsŕ louis xiv, xv and xvi periods no. relief style price price each no. relief st _vle each И louis xiv $ . louis xiv $ . ,lâ louis xv . () ‘í louis xv . louis xvi . if; louis xiv . И louis xv . ,z louis xiv . louis xv . »,í louis xv . i louis xv . т' louis xvi . o И louis xiv . â/n louis xiv . i louis xiv . louis xvi . И louis xvi . louis xvi . € louis xv . louis xvi . lí louis xv . louis xvi . louis xvi . lí louis xvi . o louis xvi . i louis xvi . »§ louis xvi . § louis xiv . i/á louis xv ‚ : louis xiv . louis xv . : louis xvi . i louis xv . () ,li louis xvi . И louis xv . louis xiv . ; louis xv . louis xiv . *; louis xvi . ”.; louis xvi . , € louis xv . ' louis xvi . louis xv . prices subject t() discount. the decorators supply СО. ешь french renaissance ornaments explanation and instructions for application on page . i _ vw kwa, « .zwi ç y. §,­ «qu-* ' 'i' gq' ­ a? " к“; tarwwîx'- ` _ ‘ _ ' *fx Ц. a'r " ` _ h i x ъ v -í ‘ a. ~ " ' i ' ` ‘ the ¿. .. з il ‘ “' »ir -p ”а l ` .. ~ —' decorators supply d со. . _,i ep' :n_ìè» _' “_ 'i'g'.n£î„~*n-.l," „l ЕЁ; '- louis xiv and xv period ornaments explanation and instructions for application on page . '.k-_ü-t-.îua-g #-.- М '.lnÍioosici ol .ldhÍhÍis shÖihci °° ' c АХ ЁПО' *fi v() ' Ах и z h oo ° z Ах $ И llt'ó ­ ax И rr() oo ' z siho'i l г о: ' yel orb() os. АХ sluo'l И slv() oc' Ах itl '( ab АХ ЗЁ‘Ю’Т И “ г i ' Ах htl ' zl' an slno'l fl. v z ' АХ ' pel lïró zi Ах ¿l - ' Ах $ e; gym', og' ¿lx Í : ' ax sino@ ff: ' aix g¿ . or" АХ sluorl #s wvÓ or' ax sl“ ’i ’el m oy' Ах `« и € or' АХ !П ' ’il gr' Ах и zït'ó ci’- Ах в s ¿ ' gz- ax ßçt yr@ or' ax $ jf ' gz' АХ ' ,' oft'ó or' АХ ‘ ‘ il v@ ?' Ах f ' : - " АХ ’e Шт 'sf' АХ “ * gms ‘ ' АХ ‘swot € ot" Ах $ ё; .'.zvó cf ' . x suwi t.' шт от Ах и „та ff' . x * шт ос' АХ ~, вам " АХ slnorl *f . ouvÓ if' Ах ь по’ ¢/, rzvó oc ‘ АХ itl ( ' oz' АХ `§ , “ i'zt'ó ° ` АХ swot *f hsv() ог ' АХ p; zî' ax $ l’ ДЕНЬ r - Ах И; „и, zi“ Ах $ y, ' ro' ax g ozt'ó €' Ах : ‘ or' Ах :Á m, € o an slno'l , vsi'Ó ос ' Ах »cl slg- oz ' Ах П ’Т ‚‚ ЁЕГЬ о: ' : [_ ’f oz ° $ !an rl’ isf() " ¿xx я}: giró г: ‘ АХ '( lsrô' gt" АХ $ Г sw@ d' ax swo'i ‘nl ”) f' Ах '] и " АХ “wwi ' Ы'Гб ГС“ Ах t,” £ " ax swwi "к syn’ ' Ах ц z ov“ ax s ; АГИ‘т of' Ах g/í i [p o“ Ах ’fl от» ff- . x am ». om. ог' Ах s n 'q stre rz- Ах $ »il (‚от f" ¿\x siu()’i if’ rrr() z _’. ‘ g- ,gr-og Ах я f s'rró :l ~ og Ах r/, lot'ó ( . "jl-‘d ê‘ims’ ‚жди-т “Ы одра aims jallaìl ~ n slnewvnbo eionvssivneib honeleld ТНЕ l’. î. / ß«`„ l; : ;î '\ ' l ggxßjö x ' * - х ч. l eslsxz'ïlr д a , r ~ d ' i f /, l a . И ,t ‘uji’ / ” а q v# x / x x ”"t zovßxäah ’lf/ x l' _. ‘ ’ev “` Í, r "/ f . по r т д l ~ ,! ' % / / 'ir-’r ’à ‘ qu' ' : с (гдфщгд? и : С ~ $ x nueczgse=ï$ai *aqrcîvnrzńnsv / z' /e l . — \ x Юхд“ \ i ' Ь ’/ x ‘/ e Хб‘д i izxavq ' ”/,x /f, . ‹х ‘ ‚ вииз french renaissance ornaments explanation and instructions for application on page . 'ii/« »t */ /. , z ‘f »fo @n à c decorators supply co. the ñexibiiity of compo enables you in mounting to vary the shape considerably. french renaissance ornaments no. relier style prive no. relief style price each each И louis xv . оо louis xv s . И louis xv . ffa’ louis xv . . И louis xv . И louis xv . И; louis xv ‚ ,l-á louis xv . i; louisi xv . ,* ’ louis xv . | louis xv . lí louis xv . И louis xv . .ïä louis xv . ‘Á louis xv . ïv'â louis xv . ‘a louis xv . ,sá louis xv . ‘a louis xv . ë'â louis xv . И louis xv . И louis xv . ‘ louis xv . И louis xv . % louis xv . s louis xv . % louis xv . louis xv . -ë/â louis xv . И louis xv . louis xv .so Ь louis xv . v; louis xv . ‘э louis xv .оо ,'/ louis xv . И louis xv . И louis xv . ' ëá louis xv . lf; louis xv . louis xv . И louis xv . И louis xv . l', louis xv . И louis xv . prices subject to discount. the decorators supply СО. compo is very flexible. the shape and form can be varied considerable when mounting. ‘ % ;( / j à n _ _ / / ' /. / french renaissance ornaments explanation and instructions for application on page . no. | no. А А А А x a page . relief :nl vi œ\ Чо- ”д Ь\ ь` “\ ш см wall panel. corner and center ornaments style louis xv louis xv louis x iv louis xiv louis xv louis xv louis xv louis xv louis xv louis xv louis xv louis xv style renaissance louis xv louis xv louis xv louis xv #wüv prive ptÍcc ОП ` compo each veneer each . $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . о . . . . . for all mouldings sec pages and . mouldings must. be ordered per foot. prices subject to discount. connecting mouldings prive. per foot $ . . . . . for mouldings and corners fitted for tapestry panels see no. А (›А А А А relief l: l,z в И 'с i Í ,lz % i; style louis xv louis xiv louis xv louis xv louis xv louis xv louis xvi louis xvi louis xv louis xv louis xv st yle. louis xv louis xvi louis xv louis xv louis xv price $ . .. . . . ‚ . . . . ‚(ц price on -ply compo each \ «neer each $ . . () . . . . . по . . . price per foot s . . . . . _, wall panels for tapestry corner and center ornaments-rabbeted mouldings and tapestry strip combination price n ­plv veneer with tapes priee price on trv strip _ compo ­pl_v ve- combination no. relief style hath neer each сайт * l ‘ " ' t ,( u *n ' l loup \.\. si 'bo $ ` $ ю i\o. style price per foot louis .xy . . . _ — -- - . n louis .\ $ . * louis xv . . . . ‚ , l ‚ _ ‚ _ Х louis .x\i . * ,'» louis .x\ i . . . г ­- - г . ‚ ‚ _ .\ louis КУ . * % louis .x\'i . . . ‚ , , . , a. louis Ä\' . И louis` x\ . . . y mg ‘yi zi louis nv . . .oo ' o ‘ ‚ — ' ­ , . . , bx louis .\ . zi; louis. .xh . . . ,_ - ' .v . ‚ . О bn louis .\ . louis` .xh` ‚(во . . ‚ ‚ — ~- г v ‚ . . ‚ .\ louth .\'\ i . Ев louis .\'i и . . . . .Ñ kvi . , Ьпшч xiv о louis . ­ д ‘y ‚ ° ­ “ ° , х ьошз xiv . louis ХЮ ‚ . o . f . -_ — г ‚ _ ‚ an louis .\' . § louis Х\ i . .оо .оо a f l -_ yv ’ louis nyi х om" a i .o , l _v _klv ‘ "oo " o ВХ louis xiv . : ‚ l lx ;.. f . . . Х louis xvi _ ì . ­ oilizvelau . . . х art nouveau _ ; )* i , ;(\? i . . ‚ х ilouis xvi _ Í 'mils '‚ ‚ ' ' o ' Х art nouveau . h louw x\ i . . . ‚ ‚ y . ‚ . Ñ ~ ‚ ` a.\ louis .\i\' . «á art nouveau .оо . . .'à louis xiv . . . ,’» louis xvi . . . * % louis niv . . . _ i' *corner ornament includes wood moulding corner. for all mouldings see pageâ and . Х rabheted for tapestry strip. ' А stands for plain mouldings. “Ъ furnish for tapestry panels a tapestry strip - which is to be nailed to the wall first. in connection with a shaped piece of wood for the corners and other ornaments which we furnish. then nail and stretch the tapestry on to said strip. the corners and other ornaments. which are mounted on -ply veneer hy us and ralibeted t receive `said strip are then nailed on the strip and lastly the ral'ilieted mouldings also nailed on to the strip. w'e send our ornaments packed on boards. you can paint and finish them before applyinp to wall. do not remove them from the boards until ready for putting up to avoid warping. the tapestry strips are shown in dark color in our illustration. ’ prices subject to discount. Моиьшно wood mouldino” wtth tapestry strijd, the decorators supply co. fait. . \‘ i “Ё. ` ' , " i ‚ / чиха п ' ‚. j/oxl/x ‘ ‚ ъ . v x qi sass в ü .yÀÉìv ‘l i: i ь @i " .e »es 'f x xavä' wall panels with mouldings and tapestry strip. three-fly combination explanation and instructions for application on page . the decorators supply co. l a » , bl` i . . ' min/« it ­ ‘." _ nearly all the ­ i *e _. " , ~ y. ' , ": Ё ЬоийзХ?.Х ?ат ‘. ` i xvi mouldings are sufficiently neutral in character to be used with any cor- ner of the different louis periods of the french r e n a is- s a n с е. moulding ordered per foot. for mouldings and corners fitted fo r tapestry panels see page . for all mouldings seie pages and . Ю 'î "',gbî'si-îœ \ . %' x `lg Í ’.l в. ‘iot _» œ’ -i \` ‘¿a a \“ о и“ n» С о. ' . «.l. . 'Í / xßÍ/a г‘ „ъ- ` 'ч ` ¿i l: '.. д lo ­"t` . ‘. ... r о .‹ о _- "» __ wall panels, corner and center ornaments prüf price price no. relief st Не compo pri.‘e on bly no. relief style compo price ou nl_v no. relief style compo price on ­ply eaeh veneer eavh each veneer each each veneer each iâ louis xv $ . $ . louis xiv $ $ . louis xiv $ . $ . . â louis xv . . ‘ng louis xiv . . ’ louis xiv . . ,' ’ louis xv . . louis xvi . . louis xv . . ЕЁ louis xv . . o "í louis .'vi . . louis xv . . „ louis xiv ‚ . i louis xiv . . ’ louis xv . . louis xiv . . louis xiv . . louis xv . . . connecting mouldings and ornaments no. relief style price each no. relief style price each no. relief st _vle price each И Етпрйго $ . per ft. a ... louis'xv $ . erft. А . . . louis xv $ . per ft. a . . . louis xv . er ft. a ... louis xv . erft. prices subject ТО discount. for mouldings and corners fii te i for tapestry pam-ls see page . for all mouldings see pages and . the v * — hn; А y x * y ïqy-z'lçxz а т.:-——‘ „vr-_» -\?. ‘/q,x"/çv А l°Í~ ‘vla mx т. "/ix "yu ‚х y. „i phx'yn ‹—_-А-_—.А_А—_А .l гущи, ‹ #www . . “! . pl . /„ . ц-`.\-`о.."\мх. uns.” ^,­ ‹.. .r ~ \^r.~­.>‘.~~.~`.«~,« . . .» `. y - .»—' . аж м и о w .u .í\.\ .. . ` ‹ ц .ъ v. х v, .` '/.х-‘/. _. n_n.- .. ; ¿y :?? ж А "—‚‹т . .д wood and compo ornamented mouldings decorators supply СО. explanation and instructions for application n page . window cornices width over projection w'idth over projection no. all over all style price per lineal foot no. all over all style price per lineal foot И ‘.«á empire $ . ii louis xvi $ .oo lí lí louis xvi . И colonial . И louis xvi . ‘ И louis x iv . И! ï'á louis xvi ‚ all above with " returns, measurements inside. all prices are for goods in the white. add % for pure gold leaf finish. add o % for metal. bronze or enamel finish. in ordering give inside measurements. always give the return. prices subject to discount. (_ .\.> the l . 'mi 'jal/aha.. decorators supply СО. .‚ n., f a, .- - мщь'дьчдьиы’шдшы lamas/ ‘Щ’ *f arb' \,: РЕ." : т „i Гас: с -~,‘­ . ‚ i» (ас—п - fà и будя"; визг/ ‘ `_‚ ÍÁ-ûaiîfńůëcäâwßdůdûÚiiÜjÍoiiÉjsi ` .fl_»„»,_¢y„p„d­ а . . .,_._. со. . . до}, . .‚„ i ‘/,x ‘/,` ‚МОМ l i“ ОМ *if* .ml/:u О Ш. x ‘/a al il и и и п it n и и и и и ц и ml il и Ш! и и и il д/г: [г мнит: ".* window cornices Бутан explanation and instructions for application (in page . window cornices no. “'idth over all projection over all measurement inside oi return % % m И '/â v: v i И % h all with " return unless otherwise ordered. measurements inside. all prices are for goods in the white. add per cent for pure gold leaf finish. add per cent for metal bronze enamel finish. ln ordering give inside measurements. always give the. return. prices subject to discount. style art nouveau art nouveau louis xv louis xv louis xv louis xv price in the white $ .оо . . . . . oo oo oo oo per lineal foot per lineal foot per lineal foot per lineal foot per lineal foot per lineal foot the y: _ w _ ‚ .. р в - с v а " ._/rwllt/ fari j Очаг.“ i — ' l i i window explanation and instructions for application on page . cornices 'fr/.. : % / x / decorators supply co. интим-п f lllnob-urbana llllllll ll lll lll lll lllllll a . l onliwíklteling von een vierkant-versiering met onderverdeeling ‘ klimop-motief ­ ` ` „i“ {хата — С?) ci* ._y' f » ¿j? ‘- ’ ед завуч“; „а ш vip/u i, а“ да, y ‚ь “y” (ш .- - . v è onhvvrkkehng’ eener versiering met. klovermokíef u) ill. '\~ n nip' Ъ ‘l " а} Н i ч we" (y „_a ;.’ f ," l.’ ‘u :n n) ' ' ”?. l if: «_» y.; Í» l“ “Отд «j v_-v l И hef ‘if ЁЪ “(ь-„Э « Ад“; 'my/mw п y-yfń yyy@ :nyy f .: - ` fl j ‘._.~ j î., . . ¿y y ъ @wn/_wb ёЗ , . «им? - они? ед его ы ' mb !• '.: ■■- vvv. «> wilson closeo ctaptffs the library wilson library der ornamentenschatz hoffmannsche buchdruckerei in stuttgart. -<» ■** a!> v) tf> "o -o <•> ig> * pompej anisch. ■ wandmalerei und bemalte basreliefs. ornamentenschatz. verl. v. jul. hoffmann , stuttgart. taf. . pompejanisch. broncen. das national-museum zu neapel, sowie die sammlungen in florenz und andern orten italiens geben einen reichen einblick in die kleinere kunst und industrie im altertum. mit hoher bewunderung erfüllt uns an den broncc-gegenständen, und seien es auch nur solche des gewöhnlichsten täglichen gebrauchs, ihre fein abgewogene edle gestaltung, welche die praktische verwendbarkeit derselben in keiner weise beeinträchtigt. kandelaber, lampen, lampenständerchen, meist in dreifufsform, vasen, koch-, efs- und trink- geräte, an denen die schwungvolle bildung des profils, des halses, namentlich aber der handhaben und henkel eine grofse vollendung erreicht; ruhebetten, kohlenbecken, theatermasken, rüstungen und wie diese dinge sonst heifsen mögen: aus ihnen allen weht der frische hauch griechischer schönheit, die sich auch in dem fast durchgängig vorhandenen weisen mafshalten nicht verbirgt. die bronce-statuettcn sind in der regel aus mehreren, besonders gegossenen stücken zusammen- gesetzt. gar viele dürfen wegen' ihrer echt künstlerischen form zu den besten schöpfungen der alten welt gezählt werden. fig. . brunnenfigur. trunkener faun. eine der in pompeji ( ) gefundenen broncefiguren, welche zu den vorzüglichsten arbeiten dieser art gehört. „ u. . zwei lampen (lucerna), im museum zu neapel. „ u. ;. grofse kandelaber, in der sammlung des louvrc in paris. „ u. . „ „ im museum zu neapel. „ . seitenansicht des knaufs vom kandelaber nr. vergröfsert. „ . kandelaberknauf, in neapel. „ . zweiarmiger kleiner kandelaber mit faunfigur, in neapel. „ . bisellium, ehrensitz für magistratspersonen, mit schöner profilierung, im louvre zu paris. „ u. . dreifüfse aus herculanum, im museum zu neapel. „ u. . kleine masken, dekorationsbruchstücke, in neapel. (aus den beiden werken von overbeck und niccolini entnommen.) chinesisch. . •dolmetsch. ohnamentenschatz , malerei. verlag <. i. hoffmann, stuttgart. taf. . chinesisch. malerei, weberei, stickerei und zellenschmelz. harakteristisch für die chinesische malerei ist die schon angeführte phantastische mischung der muster, deren absonderlichkeit jedoch bei dem grofsen reichtum und der glücklichen zusammenstellung der farben in den hintergrund tritt. namentlich sind sehr beliebt: schwarze, weifse, blaue, rote und goldene konturen; dadurch hebt sich die zeichnung von dem hellen oder dunklen grunde schöner und entschiedener ab. alles bisher gesagte gilt in vollem umfange auch von den seidenen geweben und stickereien. dafs die verarbeitung der seide in china schon lange vor christi geburt eine hohe stufe erreicht hat, ist all- gemein bekannt, weniger dagegen wohl, dafs die bei der weberei und stickerei vorkommenden goldfäden höchst wahrscheinlich aus mit vergoldetem papier oder kautschukstoff umwickelten seidenfäden bestehen. einen hohen ruf haben sich auch noch die mit sog. zellenschmelz (email cloisonnc) geschmückten vasen und platten erworben. wo derselbe erfunden wurde, läfst sich bis jetzt nicht mit sicherheit ent- scheiden, jedenfalls ist seine anwendung bei den chinesen eine sehr alte. — die technik selbst ist folgende: nachdem die beabsichtigte zeichnung auf dem mit schmelz zu bedeckenden metallgrund angegeben ist, werden die einzelnen felder derselben durch dünne, auf der metallplatte aufgelötete drähte von gold oder kupferlegierung begrenzt; die dadurch entstehenden zellen (cloisons) werden dann mit entsprechend ge- färbtem schmelz (email) angefüllt und dieser im ofen aufgeschmolzen. nach dem erkalten wird die ganze oberfläche glatt poliert. — auch hier kehren dieselben motive wie in der malerei u. s. w. wieder. fig. zeigt in dieser weise ausgeführt das so oft variierte chinesische reichssymbol, den ur- drachen (vergl. fig. ): aus dem unvollkommenen zustand eines drachen hat sich nämlich nach chinesischer anschauung der mensch einst entwickelt. fig. . konventionelle darstellungen von früchten und blumen auf porzellan gemalt. „ . gemalte bordüre von einem chinagefäfs. „ . malerei von einem hölzernen kästchen. „ , u. . teile eines behanges von einem himmelbett, gestickt in seide und gold ( . jahrhundert). „ , u. . muster von gewobenen zeugen. „ u. . teile einer kupfernen altchinesischen vase in zellenschmelz ausgeführt. „ — . ornamente an vasen, schalen und räuchergcfässen in zellenschmelz ausgeführt. aus den werken: „examples of chinese ornament by owen jones." ,,les arls decoratifs par ed. lievre." „kunst und gewerbe vom bayr. gewerbemuseunj zu nürnberg s .' malerei. weberei. stickerei und zellenschmelz. oflnamentenschatz verlag ■ j. hcffmann, stuttgart. japanesisch. . s! is! is! isls!Üisi@@fs! sst ssi «i jgta «■ ornamentenschatz. lack malerei. verl v. jul. hoffmann, stuttgart. taf. . japanesisch. lackmalerei. t'eber das verhältnis chinesischer und japanesischer kunst vergl. text zu taf. . seit langer zeit haben von japanesischen kunstprodukten die lackwaren vor allem einen hohen und durchaus gerechtfertigten ruf sich erworben. denn gerade bei ihnen zeigt sich eine für uns unerreicht dastehende technische vollendung — das ergebnis einer durch jahrhunderte sich hinziehenden und inner- halb der einzelnen familien von generation auf generation vererbten arbeitstradition. der abgeschlossen- heit der stände und zünfte in japan und china ist diese mehr und mehr wachsende vervollkommnung in der herstellung ihrer kunstgewerblichen gegenstände zuzuschreiben. während die ornamente bei chinesischen lackwaren meist naturalistische motive aufweisen, sind sie bei den japanesischen häufig mehr geometrischer art oder reine linienkombinationen. vielfach zeigt sich jedoch hier wie auf andern gebieten die auch schon bei den chinesen berührte abneigung gegen systematische anordnung der ornamente. (vergl. fig. — , , , , und , und ; tafel , fig. .) der stil der lackmalerei ist bis heute derselbe, geblieben, ebenso wie das ungemein komplizierte herstellungsverfahren. die unterlage, die je nach dem zweck aus holz, einer anzahl papierlagen, papier- mache oder bastgeflecht besteht, das durch verstreichen mit harz eine glatte oberfläche erhalten hat, wird mit um so mehr lackanstrichen bedeckt, je feiner die gegenstände sich schliefslich präsentieren sollen. bei den kostbarsten kommen so bisweilen lackschichten aufeinander. die hiebei vorzu- nehmenden manipulationen sind ausserordentlich langwierig und zeitraubend. zur dekorierung wird oft perlmutter und elfenbein eingelegt; das gewöhnlichste ist aber die vergoldung in der art, dafs entweder das ornament mit jeder neuen lage lack neu in gold gemalt wird (daher ein reliefartiges aussehen) oder so, dafs die einmalige vergoldung durch die obere lage des transparenten lackes durchschimmert. — der lack kommt als fertiges naturprodukt ^baumsaft) in gelber, brauner und hellgelber qualität vor. letztere färbt sich an der luft in kurzer zeit tiefschwarz. fig. — . motive für lackarbeiten. entnommen aus: „keramic art of japan by audsley-bowes." taf. japanesisch. weberei, malerei und zellenschmelz. jl!>s ist nicht wohl möglich, für die produkte chinesischer und japanesischer kunst sicher unterscheidende merkmale anzugeben; denn seit alter zeit herrschte zwischen beiden ländern ein reger handelsverkehr und austausch der jeweiligen errungenschaften und fortschritte auf kunstgewerblichem gebiete, und die folge dieses wechselseitigen lehrens und lernens war bei beiden völkern eine gleichmäfsigkeit, sowohl was ihre geschmacksbildung als auch was ihre verschiedenen techniken anbelangt. dafs letztere in diesen zwei ländern zu hoher vollkommenheit gelangten, haben wir bereits gehört; aber gerade diese äusserste steigerung des technischen vermögens hat in china und japan eine beschränkung des geistigen elements, eine unterdrückung des individuellen künstlerischen bewustseins zur folge gehabt, von dem sich japan nur teilweise frei hielt. — wenn nun für die japanesische kunst im allgemeinen alles bei tafel und gesagte gilt, so ist hier doch zu bemerken, dafs sie in neuerer zeit wieder einen frischen aufschwung zu nehmen scheint, wie sie sich überhaupt von jeher durch eine etwas geregeltere ornamentation, feinere beobachtung der natur und freier hervortretenden individualismus auszeichnete. neu gegenüber den chinesen ist bei den japanesen die anwendung des zellenschmelzes auf porzellangefäfsen. die metalldrähte werden bei dieser von den europäern noch nie fertig gebrachten technik auf den gegenständen durch leicht schmelzbaren glasfluss befestigt, nachdem die betreffenden stellen von der glasur befreit worden sind. das sonstige verfahren ist wie das bei taf. erwähnte. beachtenswert ist die thatsache, dafs, obwohl für verarbeitung des porzellans die chinesen die lehrmeister der japanesen waren, letztere doch bald sich den ruf erwarben, dafs ihre produkte nicht nur hinsichtlich der güte und feinheit, sondern vielfach auch wegen ihrer gewaltigen gröfse diejenigen der chinesen weit hinter sich lassen. es gilt das nicht allein von bemalten, sondern insbesondere von kolossal- platten und vasen, die mit zellenschmelz auf ihrer ganzen oberfläche bedeckt durch ihr tiefes gesättigtes kolorit eine wunderbare pracht und harmonie zur schau tragen. fig. — . bordüren und muster von seidenen stoffen. r u. . malereien von einer alten porzellan-vase. r . bemalung von einer alten becherförmigen vase. „ u. . bordüren von fayence-vasen. „ — . ornamente von emaillierten vasen ( , und sind modern . entnommen aus: „keramic art of japan l>y audsley-bowes." japanesisch. . weberei, malerei und zellenschmelz. ornamentenschatz. verl. v. jul. hoffmann . stuttgart. indisch. . rm*»»!»mm*?m?»*tt mm h. dolmetsch ornamentenschatz. metallarbeiten verl v. iul hoffmann, stuttgart. taf. . indisch. met allarbeiten. yergl. auch text zu taf. . die anfertigung von verzierten waffen und metallgeräten bildete von jeher einen wichtigen zweig des indischen kunstgewerbes, und es erregt der feine geschmack, verbunden mit der gröfsten pracht der dekoration, unftr gerechtes erstaunen. besondere berücksichtigung haben auf unserer tafel die tauschierarbeiten erfahren. dieselben sind auf stahl, eisen oder zinnlegierung ausgeführt. in letzterem falle ist die zeichnung durch einwirkung von schwefel in tiefem schwarz herausgehoben. die tauschierten oder damaszierten ornamente sind von silber- und goldfolie hergestellt, welche durch druck oder hämmern auf den zuvor leicht gravierten metallgrund befestigt werden, worauf dann das ganze mit dem polierstahl geglättet wird. fig. i. zinngefäfs mit tauschierten ornamenten. . streitaxt mit geätzten verzierungen. r - streitaxt mit tauchierarbeit. ■• - schild aus rhinozeroshaut mit metall ausgelegt und beschlagen. » s - . verzierungen von tauschierten huhkas (wasserpfeifen). r - getriebene bauchverzierung an einer vergoldeten kupferkanne. - io. bauchverzierung von einer getriebenen kupferkanne. •• . verzierung von einer tauschierten zinnvase. r . tauschierarbeit auf stahl an einer dolchscheide. v - halsverzierung an einem tauschierten zinnbecher. - . von einem getriebenen kupferteller. ?• - von einem getriebenen zinnteller. fig. , , io, — aufgenommen nach original-gegenständen aus de n kgl. landesgewerbemuseum zu stuttgart. „ i, — und ii aufgenommen nach original-gegenständen in händen des hrn. fabrikanten paul stotz in stuttgart. „ entnommen aus: bedford, the treasury of ornamental art. „ aus waring, masterpieces of industrial art and sculpture at the international exhibition s . tat . indisch. stickerei, weberei, geflechte und lackmalerei. tt Ülin land voll üppiger vegetation, reich an naturprodukten aller art, mit unerschöpflichen fundgruben edler metalle und steine, hat indien seinen charakter übersprudelnder fülle und den phantastischen geist seiner bewohner in den werken der kunst nicht verleugnet. trotz der alten verhältnismäfsig hohen zivilisation hat aber ein gewisser konservatismus, der seit beinahe einem jahrtausend auf soziale und reli- giöse verhältnisse und einrichtungen sich erstreckte, selbstverständlich auch für kunstbestrebungen seine unausbleiblichen folgen gehabt, namentlich im hinblick auf die kastenartig abgeschlossenen einzelgewerbe. erst in unserem jahrhundert können wir bei der indischen kunst thatsächliche neuerungen konstatieren. wenig konventionell, leicht fliefsend, hat die indische ornamentik am ehesten einige verwandt- schaft mit der persischen. die flächendekoration, die ihren charakter als solche nie verliert, weist meist einen geradezu verschwenderischen reichtum von sich wiederholenden motiven auf, deren grofsartige farbenpracht jedoch das auge des beschauers nicht aufregt, sondern eine wohlthuende ruhe für dasfelbe hervorbringt. die konturen der jede modellierung vermeidenden zeichnung sind gewöhnlich auf hellem grunde in tieferen farben als das übrige dessin und auf dunklem grunde in hellen gehalten. seine motive fand der inder, wie leicht erklärlich, hauptsächlich in seiner heimischen flora. diese ist in erster linie vertreten durch lotos, prächtig gezeichnete rosen, nelken, granaten u. s. w., und am häufigsten, nament- lich bei neueren produkten, begegnen wir dem stets konventionell behandelten palmzweige (fig. u und tafel fig. , ; tafel fig. , und ). die einst hochentwickelte weberei ist infolge der englischen konkurrenz im sinken begriffen und auch die moderne seidenstickerei hat auf kosten der früheren, ruhigen harmonie die allzu grellen anilin- farben vielfach angewendet. ihren alten weltruf werden aber die berühmten shawls von kaschmir doch noch lange behalten mit ihrer unerreichten feinheit, zartheit und ihren herrlichen farben. bunte baumwoll- teppiche (fig. und }, deren gestreifte zeichnung sich dem stoffe vortrefflich anpafst, erfreuen sich als wohlfeiler ersatz der wollteppiche einer grofsen verbreitung. — auch die geflochtenen matten verdienen hinsichtlich ihrer farbe und zeichnung unsere volle beachtung (fig. ). die indischen lackarbeiten, im vergleich mit den chinesischen und japanesischen in der technik etwas weniger vollendet, unterscheiden sich von denselben in dem wesentlichen tunkt, dafs der lack eigentlich nur dazu dient, die in gold oder polychrom aufgetragenen ornamente zu schützen. fig. . gestickter tcppich aus dem . jahrhundert. „ — . bordüren von seidenstickereien. „ . fiächenmuster in seide gestickt. „ u. . baumwollteppiche. b . matte aus binsengeflecht. ., u. . einfassungsmuster von shawls aus kaschmir. ., u. . gemalte lackarbeiten. entnommen .ins den werken: wyatt, the industrial arts of the nineteenth century, s . waring, masterpieces of industrial art and sculpture at the international exhibition s . bedford, the treasury of ornamental art. lievre les arts decoratifs ä toutes les epoques. indisch. fflolme'.sch stickerei, weberei, geflechte und lackmalerei. ornamentenschatz. verl. v. jul. hoffmann, stuttgart. taf. . indisch. metallarbeiten, stickerei, weberei und malerei. i^unstreiche verwendung, namentlich bei goldschmiedearbeiten, fand der sog. grubenschmelz (email champleve). auf dem metall wurden die für emaillierung bestimmten teile durch den grabstichel vertieft und zur abgrenzung der einzelnen felder schmale ränder stehen gelassen. das weitere verfahren ist fast das gleiche, wie beim zellenschmelz. — als prächtiger vertreter jener technik darf der in fig. dargestellte ankus (lenk- und zuchtinstrument der elephantentreiber) gelten. manuskriptmalereien, die persischen einflufs nicht verkennen lassen, treffen wir in indien häufig bei alten königlichen edikten, dokumenten und handschriften religiösen und poetischen inhalts. fig. i. ankus in ziseliertem eisen. u. . ohrgehänge und knopf in gold getrieben und ziseliert. r - ankus, emailliert und mit juwelen besetzt. r — - verzierungen von emaillierten waffen. '■ . staatssonnenschirm mit reicher goldstickerei. - n- . gestickte fächer. - . fufsbekleidung, goldgewebe mit seiden- und perlstickerei. is- gestickte tischdecke. - . bordüre von einer satteldecke. r . stickerei auf schwarzem zeug. >■ . bordüre von einem gestickten samtteppich. r — . blumen von seidenstickereien. - . gewobener shawl. - bordüre von einem gewobenen stoff. r u. . muster von seiden- und goldgeweben. . lackmalerei. r . teil eines buchdeckels in lackmalerei. n u. . manuskriptmalereien. entnommen aus den werken: „wyatt, the industrial arts of the nineteenth century ." „waring, masterpieces of industrial art and sculpture at the international exhibition ." „man's garments, the textile manufactures of india." „bedford, the treasury of ornamental art." „raeinet, le costume historique." taf. . ■m persisch. architektur. Üin bild von der märchenhaften pracht des alten kalifenreiches, von den glänzenden palästen und moscheen persiens geben uns noch heute die zahlreichen, wenn auch mehr oder weniger zerfallenen monumentalbauten. die frühere hauptstadt ispahan zeigt namentlich noch an einer reihe von beispielen, in welch reicher weise die perser das aussehen ihrer bauten durch anwendung buntfarbiger oder bemalter glasierter thonplättchen zu gestalten wufsten. mit solchen sind fast alle der meist birn- oder zwiebei- förmig (vgl. fig. ) gestalteten kuppeln und spitzen der moscheen und minarets und ihre wände, kurz fast alle teile jener gebäude bedeckt. (fig. , , , , .) dieser durchweg angewandte reiche farbige schmuck ist für die persische architektur im vergleich mit der sonstigen mohammedanischen in hohem grade bezeichnend, wie auch die besondere art ihrer dekoration. diese weist einmal weit weniger reiche kombinationen in ihren geometrischen verzierungen (fig. ) auf, als bei den arabern und mauren, und sodann ist das vegetabilische ornament, wenn auch konventionell behandelt, doch noch ziemlich naturalistisch gehalten und bietet, entsprechend +«- gothisch. . taf. . gothisch. architektur, skulptur und ornamentik. p^ctm gothischen stil treffen wir, abgesehen von ausartungen in der spätesten zeit der gothik, durch- gängig eine unterordnung der verzierungen unter die architektur. nach diesem grundsätze überwuchert daher das ornament nirgends den architektonischen aufbau, wird nie selbstzweck, sondern dient nur dazu, den eindruck der architektur in harmonischer weise zu ergänzen oder einzelnes je nach bedürfnis hervor- zuheben. so erhalten namentlich die spitzbogigen portale und fenster, die kühn aufwärtsstrebenden türme und türmchen, fialen etc. etc., die kapitäle und gesimse, chorstühle und galerien ornamentalen schmuck, mit welchem auch die werke der kleinkunst, haus- und kirchengerätc durchaus nicht kärglich bedacht sind. die kapitäle sind meist nur eine glockenförmige erweiterung des säulenschaftes, um welche in freier weise blätter und blumen gewunden sind (fig. — ). die verwendung vegetabilischen schmuckes ist überhaupt eine sehr ausgedehnte: so sind z. b. die krabben oder knollen an den kanten der giebel und turmpyramiden eigentlich nichts anderes als in freier weise umgestaltete blätter, und die schlufssteine in den gewölben, die konsolen u. s. w. sind ebenfalls sehr häufig mit blätterschmuck versehen. an der bearbeitung und auffassung dieser blätter und blumen lässt sich die zeit, aus welcher ein bauwerk, ein geräte herstammt, mit ziemlicher sicherheit bestimmen. während nämlich in der ersten zeit der gothik ( . jahrh.) die behandlung eine volle und breite ist, welche die naturformen nur leicht stilisiert (fig. , , , , , ), bekommt später eine schwungvollere ausführung die oberhand (fig. — }. und in der letzten periode des gothischen stils endlich läfst sich eine wachsende entfernung von den natür- lichen formen nicht verkennen, indem alles blattwerk ein knorriges aussehen erhält, wobei sich dann auf der einen seite eine gewisse erstarrung geltend macht (fig. , , ), während auf der andern seite eine mitunter unruhige bewegung herrscht (fig. , , \ dazu trägt wesentlich auch die gewohnheit bei, die blätter so frei zu unterarbeiten, dafs sie nur leicht angeheftet erscheinen, was vielfach einen zu harten wechsel von licht und schatten zur folge hat. das laubwcrk ist mit vorliebe der heimischen flora entnommen. die blätter des weinstocks, der distel, der eiche und buche, des epheus und klees, der rosen u. s. w., an welche sich meist symbolische bedeutungen knüpfen, treten überall auf. menschen- und tierfiguren finden eine vielfach humoristische verwendung bei den sog. wasser- speiern. auch konsolen, schlufssteine und namentlich die giebelfelder über den thüren sind mit figürlichen darstellungen geschmückt. fig. . geschnitzte figur vom chorgcstühle des münsters zu ulm. r . knauf an einer sitzklappc misericordia) an demselben gestühlc. „ . schlufssteinverzierung aus dem dom zu naumburg. r . kapitälknauf von der kirche zu gelnhausen. „ . „ französischen ursprungs. „ . kreuzblume von der notrc-dame-kirche zu paris. r . knauf an einer kreuzblume daselbst. r . kreuzblume vom tabernakel der ehemaligen spitalkirche zu kfslingen b . krabbe aus nürnberg. „ . r vom dom zu köln. u. . kehlenverzierung daselbst. . . u. . wasserspeier daselbst. r . kapitäl französischen ursprungs. „ . „ vom kreuzgange der kirche zu wimpffen im thal. „ „ von der glockenhalle der frauenkirche zu efslingen. r . r vom taufsteine in der marienkirche zu reutlingen. r . gesimsverzierung an der kathedrale zu troyes. r . geschnitzte u. durchbrochene füllung eines schrankthürchens französischen ursprungs. „ . kchlenverzierung von der kirche zu wimpffen im thal. „ . „ aus nürnberg. fig. i, , , , , , , u. — . aufgenommen nach modellen aus der (jipstnodellsammlung der kgl. ceutralstellc für gewerbe und handel. das Übrige entnommen aus: ..kranz schmitz: der dom zu köln." ..heideloff, die ornamentik des mittelalters." „yiollet-le-duc, dictionnaire raisonne de l'architecture francaise de xi. au xvi. siecle." ..raguenet, materieaux et documents d'architeclure et sculpture. taf. . gothisch. weberei, stickerei, bemalte skulptur und email. c^jewebe und stickereien, welche in grosser anzahl während der gothischen periode namentlich in den klöstern gefertigt wurden, schlossen sich in der ersten zeit noch an die vom süden und osten über- kommenen muster an (fig. ). aber man verschmähte dies allmählig und wandte sich besonders der verzierung durch blumen und blätter zu, die in strenger stilisierung verwendung finden, ohne jedoch das figürliche element auszuschliefsen. letzteres hatte seinen platz namentlich bei heiligen gewändern, vot- hängen und teppichen in kirchen, wo ihm eine symbolische beziehung unterlegt wurde. dafs in der italienischen gothik auch das linienornament seinen platz behauptete (fig. - ), darf uns bei dem einfluss byzantinischer und arabischer kunst in der früheren zeit nicht wunder nehmen (vergl. auch taf. , fig. , , , ). skulpturen von holz oder stein wurden vielfach bemalt; die gewandmuster zeigen dann gewöhn- lich die oben erwähnten motive. 'fig. u. gehören schon dem Übergang von der gothik zur renaissance an. das email fand besonders im . jahrhundert an den prächtigen reliquienschreinen reichste an- wendung, hiebei kamen jedoch die romanischen zierformen noch sehr zur geltung. fig. [. statue des h. simon im chor des domes zu köln. . gewandmuster an einer andern statue daselbst. „ . gestickte bordüre französischen ursprungs. xiv. jahrhundert. „ . gestickter stoff „ „ (anstatt gold ist im original silber an- gewendet. xv. jahrh. . „ „ xiv. jahrh. — . bordüren und teppichmuster von den wandgemälden der oberkirche s. francesco zu assisi. xiv. jahrh. „ . teppichmuster von einem temperagemälde des niccolo alunno ( in der pina- kothek zu perugia. „ . sizilianisches gewebe aus der marienkirche zu danzig. xiii. jahrh. „ . borde eines teppichs auf dem bilde des hugo van der goes in den uffizien zu florenz. xv. jahrh. „ . „ „ „ auf einem bilde von mantegna in s. zeno zu verona, ende des xv. jahrh. „ . bordüre von einem gestickten mefsgewande. xiv. jahrh. (deutsche arbeit). „ u. . stoffmuster aus dem xiv. jahrh., französischen ursprungs. „ . vergoldete kupfergravierung von der kreuzreliquientafel in der kath. pfarrkirche zu mettlach. „ — . emaillierte verzierungen am schrein der h. drei könige im dom zu köln, anfang des xiii. jahrh. r . emaillierte bordüre aus dem anfang des xiii. jahrh. im musee de cluny. fig. — . aufgenommen von reg.-baumeister borkhardt in stuttgart. „ u. . „ „ h. dolmetsch. das Übrige entnommen aus: ..weerth, kunstdenkmäler des christl. mittelalters in den rheinlanden." „uoffmann, les arts et l'industrie." _cahier et martin, melanges d'archeologie." „louandre, les arts somptuaires." „dupont-auberville, l'ornement des tissus." „viollet-le-duc, dictionnaire raisonne du mobilier francais." i gothisch. . h. dolmetsch. manuskriptmalerei. ornamentenschatz. verlag v. jul. hoffmann, stuttgart. taf. . gothisch. manuskriptmalerei. i n der manuskriptmalerei verdrängten die lebhaften formen des ornamentes nur langsam die runden, flächenfüllenden des romanischen stils. die blumen wurden teils stilisiert, teils sind sie ganz naturalistisch gehalten und fig. und geben uns ein bild davon, wie beide arten der behandlung oft miteinander verbunden wurden, so besonders in der späteren zeit der gothik. charakteristisch für diese ist eine kräftige schattierung, sowie der gebrauch von halbtönen und das aufsetzen von lichtern. bemerkenswert ist die mannigfaltigkeit und pracht der farben, mit welchen uns die üppige und lebensvolle blumenflora in den miniaturen der ehrwürdigen handschriften jener zeit vorgeführt wird. fig. — aus dem xiv. jahrhundert. * — samt den einzelnen blättern und blumen aus dem xv. jahrh. fig. i, u. . aufgenommen von /eichner p. ilaaga nach minialuren im museum vaterländischer altertümer zu stuttgart. „ . aufgenommen von prof. händel in weimar. das Übrige entnommen aus: „llumphreys and jones, the illuminated books of the middle ages." „wyatt, the art of illuminaling as practised in europc from the earlicst times." taf. . d, 'ie we tere hindert, dafs dagegen bot menden figu- ren wurden be- einflufst durch die richtung nach oben und den oft sehr schmalcnplatz, der für sie an- gewiesen war, demzufolge tragen sie denn auch nicht sel- ten ein zu schlankes aussehen zur schau. aber im unter- schied von den romanischen gestalten, ha- ben sie fast alle etwas le- bendiges und graziöses in haltung und gebärde; doch führte dies in der weiteren entwicklung zu einer ge- wissen gewun- denen, mani- sich zur anbringung ornamentalen schmuckes reichliche gelegenheit. gothisch. wand- und deckenmalerei. ausbildung der wandmalerei wurde in der gothischen periode dadurch einigermafsen ge- sehen geeignete mauerflächen zur aufnahme von gröfseren gemälden vorhanden waren. die vorkom- rierten stel- lung. (vergl. fig. u.taf. , fig. .) - die gewandfalten fliefsen weich, in langen, schönen li- nien herab, die konturen der- selben sind schwarz und kommt nur sehr wenig schattierung in bunter far- be vor. bei fig. ist die schattierung durch schwar- ze strichlagen gebildet. fig. ist ein bei- spiel dafür, in welcherweise die antike wieder gel- tung gewinnt und so zur renaissance hinüberführt. fig. . fig. . . u- - - u. . . u. . — . u. i. . von einem stammbaum in der hospitalkirche zu stuttgart. xv. jahrhundert. teil von fig. . bemaltes flachornament mit zurückgeschnittenem grunde. aus der kirche zu brauweiler. xiv. jahrh. aus einer kapelle zu ramersdorf. xiv. jahrh. aus einem ncbengcmach der stiftskirche zu fritzlar. xv. jahrh. aus der jakobinerkirche zu agen. xiii. jahrh. „ st. chapellc zu paris. xiii. jahrh. ,. „ oberkirche san francesco zu assisi. „ „ unterkirche daselbst. (siehe obige text-illustration.) untere ansicht des holzbaldachins über dem ehemaligen abtsstuhle in der klosterkirche zu blaubeuren. fig. i. aufgenommen von /eichner p. haaga in stuttgart. „ . „ ,, zeichenlehrer weifs in blaubeuren. „ — . n v h. dolmetsch. das übrige entnommen aus: „weerth, wandmalereien des christlichen mtttelalters in den rheinlanden." „lindeil, zeitschrift für bauwesen." „calliat, f.ncyclopedie d'architecture.'' . taf. . italienische renaissance. glasmalerei. m ehr und mehr kam man schon in der gothischen periode davon ab, die fensteröffnungen ganz mit farbigen gläsern zu füllen. an ihre stelle traten vollends mit dem beginn des renaissancestils, kleine glasgemälde auf farblosem grunde, welche allerdings dann wieder eine oft überreiche einfassung und umrahmung erhielten, so dafs diese letztere mit ihren der pflanzen- und tierwelt entnommenen, gar häufig aber auch die menschliche gestalt in den bereich ihrer darstellung ziehenden ornamenten die hauptsache zu bilden scheint. dafs es dabei an allerlei symbolischen gegenständen und figuren nicht fehlt, zeigt ein blick auf die beiliegende tafel, deren inhalt jedoch schon der späteren zeit der renaissance angehört. fig. . aus dem nationalmuseum im bargello zu florenz, aufgenommen von h. dolmetsch. — . aus der certosa bei florenz von giovanni da udine), aufgenommen von reg.- baumeister borkhardt und architekt eckert in stuttgart. taf. . italienische renaissance. fayenceplatten. j^)as material und die art der herstellung glasierter thonplättchen brachten es mit sich, dafs fufsböden und wandbekleidungen aus solchen plättchen kein in allen einzelheiten so fein durchgeführtes ornament aufzuweisen vermochten, wie schöpfungen aus metall, marmor u. s. w. wo diese technik daher über das einfache geometrische muster hinausgeht, sind die meist an byzantinische und orientalische vorbilder erinnernden ornamente doch bescheiden, aber dafür auch um so klarer und kräftiger. ihre wirkung erhält aber noch eine steigerung durch die trefflichkeit der farbenzusammenstellung: und doch wurden in weiser mäfsigung fast nie mehr als farben zur anwendung gebracht. besondere berühmtheit erlangte durch fabrikation solcher ziegelböden- und wandbekleidungs- platten die schule der robbia, weshalb solche plattenmosaiken vielfach unter dem namen „robbiaarbeiten" verzeichnet werden. fig. , , , , , , u. . bekleidungsplatten an den treppenwänden des hauses nr. in via luccoli zu genua. ,. , , , , , u. . desgleichen in haus nr. in via s. matteo daselbst. „ u. . fufsbodenplatten aus san petronio zu bologna. aufgenommen von reg.-baumeister borkhardt in stuttgart. italienische renaissance. . ornamentenschatz. kehl. v. jul. hoffmann, stuttgart. fayence- platten. italienische renaissance. «. idolmetsch fagaden -malerei. namentenschatz. verl. v. jul. hoffmann, stuttgart taf. . italienische renaissance. fassadenmalerei. a m anfang des . jahrhunderts tritt in italien zuerst der stil der renaissance auf, und es läfst sich die zeit bis ca. als die zeit der frührenaissance bezeichnen, im gegensatz zur hochrenaissance, deren dauer bis in die mitte des . jahrhunderts geht. renaissance ist wiederaufnahme, aber nicht sklavische nachbildung, sondern freie bearbeitung antiker formen. dies tritt besonders zu tage beim ornament, welches dieser stil so reichlich und um- fassend, wie kein anderer, verwertet. namentlich bezieht sich dies auf die motive, die wir finden. da fällt uns vor allem das pflanzenornament ins auge, welches in der frührenaissance den grund meist noch mäfsig bedeckt. es sind fast stets zarte, schön geschwungene ranken in symmetrischer oder doch regel- mäfsiger anordnung. dabei spielt die hauptrolle das antike akanthusblatt, welches freilich die mannig- fachste umbildung erfährt. auch die) rebe, der lorbeer, der epheu u. s. w. werden vielfach verwertet, teils naturalistisch, teils stilisiert. aber dieses laubwerk mit seinen zweigen und früchten erhält durch tiere aller art, phantastische wesen, menschen, sodann durch symbolische gegenstände, waffen, masken, embleme. vasen, kandelaber u. dergl. reiche abwechslung und belebung. hauptsächlich ausgebildet wird die verbindung von menschen- und tiergestalten mit vegetabilischen elementen fig. , vgl. auch taf. ). ein nicht unwichtiger bestandteil der verzierung sind endlich die wappen und wappenschilder, letztere gewöhnlich als sogenannte rofsstirnschilde (fig. u. ) zur zeit der frührenaissance, späterhin dann als kartouche. alles bisher erwähnte finden wir bei der fassadenmalerei, d. h. bei den malereien, mit denen einzelne häuserfassaden in ermangelung plastischen schmuckes vollständig überzogen waren, welche entweder ornamente oder geschichtliche darstellungen zur schau tragen. die farben sind lebhaft und harmonisch zusammengestellt, so dafs ein prächtiger eindruck durch solche oft nicht blofs bemalte, sondern auch gemalte architektur erzielt wird. aus späterer zeit, wo die figurenreichen, geschichtlichen darstellungen das ornament beinahe ganz verdrängten, findet man auch häufig broncefarbig oder grau in grau gemalte fassaden. fig. — . von der fassade eines hauses in genua (via san matteo nr. ). „ . hoffassade von „casa taverna" in mailand. _ — . r des palazzo piccolomini in pienza. fig. —ii aufgenommen von reg.-baumeister borkhardt in stuttgart. das Übrige entnommen aus: reinhardt, palast-architektur italiens: genua. gruner, speeimens of ornamental art. taf. . italienische renaissance. intarsien. jjlühte zur zeit der renaissance die holzschnitzerei überhaupt, so gilt das in ganz besonderem grade von einem zweige derselben, nämlich von den eingelegten holzarbeiten (intarsien), mit welchen namentlich chorstühle, schränke in sakristeien u. s. w. aufs reichste geschmückt waren. hinsichtlich der gegenstände der darstellung findet eigentlich keine beschränkung statt, da wir ganze gemälde, perspektivische ansichten und ornamente in buntester auswahl antreffen. letztere, meist hell auf dunklem grunde, bieten uns eine herrliche fülle von stilisierten pflanzenmotiven, vermischt oder verbunden mit allerlei vasen, gefäfsen, lebenden wesen u. s. w. die anordnung des rankenwerks ist, wenigstens bei regelmäfsigen umrahmten flächen, eine streng symmetrische. auch hier steht das akanthusblatt in erster linie zur verfügung; jedoch ist hier der einflufs zu beachten, den die herstellungsweise auf die spitzen der blätter ausübt. um gröfsere lebendigkeit zu erreichen, wird mitunter neben der intarsia das niello angewandt; die blattrippen, schraffierungen u. s. w. werden durch ausfüllung mit einer dunklen masse hergestellt. fig. n r - - . . i. vom chorgestühl in s. anastasia in verona. vom sockel der sakristeischränke in s. maria in organo daselbst. vom chorgestühl daselbst. vom chorgestühl in monte oliveto maggiore. „ — - „ u. . in s. petronio zu bologna. (grund der mittelfelder schwarz.) in der certosa bei pavia, (bei fig. grund schwarz.) nach aufnahmen von reg.-baumeister borkhardt in stuttgart. italienische renaissance. ibclmetsch decken-malerei. ornamentenschatz. verl. v. jul. hoffmann , stuttgart taf. i». italienische renaissance. deckenmalerei. j^.n den deckengewölben wie an den ebenen holzdecken in kirchen und palästen fand der künstlerische geist ein reiches feld für seine thätigkeit. die gröfsten künstler wirkten mit bei der veredlung des ornaments, indem sie ihre freskomalereien mit verzierungen selbst umrahmten (fig. u. ). der unter- grund dieser aus vegetabilischen und animalischen elementen gemischten ornamente ist meist leicht; die farben selbst heiter und lebhaft. — daneben fehlt es jedoch auch nicht an einfacheren mustern. wo keine bildlichen darstellungen auftreten, ersetzen deren stelle gemalte kassetten oder rosetten, eingefafst von geometrischen ornamenten. — bemerkenswert ist auch die verbindung von solchen farbigen orna- menten mit mehr oder weniger einfacher stuckdekoration, die aber oft wie bei fig. . in täuschender weise mit dem pinsel imitiert ist. die beiden rosetten 'fig. u. \ ) gehören zwar ihrer entstehung nach einer der renaissance vorangehenden periode an, sie zeigen aber doch schon in ihren bildungen eine ausgesprochene verwandtschaft mit der eigentlichen renaissance. fig. — . vom chorgewölbe in s. maria del popolo zu rom. (von pinturicchio.) r . aus einem der borgia-zimmer im vatikan zu rom. r u. . muster von den gewölbfeldern in der certosa bei pavia. r u. . bordüren um diese gewölbfelder. . . u. . medaillons von den gewölbfeldern in s. francesco zu lodi. fig. i— . aufgenommen von ii. dolmetsch, architekt in stuttgart, und ii. weinhold, bildhauer in dresden. „ —in. aufgenommen von reg. baumeister bnrkhardt in stuttgart. ,, u. . entnommen aus: ,,gruner, speeimens of ornamental art." tat . italienische renaissance. spitzentechnik. im altertum unbekannt und jedenfalls erst seit ende des . jahrhunderts zu künstlerischer vollkommen- heit gelangt, kann die spitzentechnik so recht eine schöpfung der renaissance genannt werden. und zwar ist italien, namentlich mit den beiden städten venedig und genua der boden, dem man sowohl die nadelspitzen als auch die feinste gattung der auf dem klöppelkissen gefertigten arbeiten zu verdanken hat. die ersteren, die sogenannten „points", sind als die kostbarere gattung zu betrachten. ihre technik, bei welcher grund und ornamente aus lauter ä jour gefertigten einzelnen stichen bestehen, läfst eine äufserst zarte und graziöse gestaltung zu. ihre ausführung beruht aber auf einem sehr umständlichen und schwierigen verfahren, wobei nur kleine stückchen von ca. cm ausdehnung ausgeführt werden können, die alsdann nach ihrer vollendung zu einem zusammenhängenden ganzen aneinandergefügt werden müssen, weshalb bei der komposition der spitzenmuster notwendig auf die möglichkeit einer unbemerkbaren zusammensetzung der einzelnen teile rücksicht genommen werden mufs. die geschätzteste der genähten spitzen ist die venetianische reliefspitze, bei welcher alle blätter, blumen etc. erhabene ränder zeigen. eine noch höhere stufe dieser spitzengattung wird in arbeiten mit hochaufgestellten blättern erreicht fig. u. ). die technik der geklöppelten spitzen oder kissenspitzen (dentelles) besteht in kunstvollem verknüpfen und verflechten von fäden nach einem durchdachten systeme. bezüglich der feinheit dieser klöppelspitzen gibt es bedeutende gradverschiedenheiten, welche auf die schwierigkeit der ausführung, wie auf die kostbarkeit derselben von gröfstem einflusse sind. das spitzen-ornament schliefst sich dem übrigen renaissance-ornament vollständig an, mit der beschränkung, dafs hier natürlich pflanzenmotive entschieden vorwiegen, obgleich auch bildliche dar- stellungen, vögel und dergl. keineswegs fehlen. genähte arbeit. fig. , u. . venetianische spitze. ., , u. . venetianische relief-spitze. , u. . desgl. mit hochaufgestellten blättern. , . roselina-spitze. . reticella-spitze. . italienische guipure. . genueser kirchenspitze. klöppelarbeit. ., . kragen in venetianischer guipure. diese aus dem . u. . jahrhundert stammenden spitzenmuster sind nach kopien reproduziert, welche in der vom k. k. öster- reichischen staate zur ausbildung von spitzenlehrerinnen errichteten zentral-spitzen-schule zu wien in meisterhafter weise gefertigt und durch vermittelung der bekannten aus dem erzgebirge stammenden spitzen-firma ,,a. kliegl & sohn, kgl. hoflieferanten in stuttgart" für unsere publikation zur verfügung gestellt wurden. italienische renaissance. italienische renaissance. h) olmetsch. sgraffiten, marmoreinlagen und flachreliefs. ornamentenschatz. verl. v. jul. hoffmann, stuttgart. wand-u.decken-malerei. ornamentenschatz. «erl. v. jul. hoffmann , stuttgart taf. . italienische renaissance. wand- und deckenmalerei. schönsten und edelsten stellt sich die dekorierende wand- und deckenmalerei der hochrenaissance dar in den werken rafaels und seiner schule, so besonders in den loggien des vatikans. rühren hier auch die malereien zum grofsen teile nicht von seiner hand her, so sind sie doch von seinen schülern nach seinen angaben und in seinem sinne ausgeführt. es läfst sich dabei nicht verkennen, dafs von grofsem einflufs, namentlich für die verbindung von stuck und malerei, die damals entdeckten titus- thermen in rom waren; allein sie reizten ihn nicht nur zur nachbildung, sondern regten ihn hauptsächlich zur schöpfung immer neuer und wechselnder motive für figuren, guirlanden u. s. w. an. und so bieten sich im vatikan dem beschauer in grofsartiger fülle malereien dar, bei denen das verhältnis von figur und ornament, von dekoration und architektur und namentlich der farben zu einander in feinster weise zur geltung kommt. — bemerkenswert ist das vorherrschen sekundärer farben. (fig. .) von einem schüler rafaels rühren auch die malereien im palazzo doria in genua her. stehen sie auch nicht auf gleich hoher stufe, wie die rafaelischen werke, so sind sie doch in ihren einzelnheiten durchaus schön und beweisen namentlich einen äufserst glücklichen sinn für die zusammenstellung der farben. — Über die zur anwendung kommenden motive, vergl. das zu tafel ff. bemerkte. fig. . deckenmalerei im palazzo doria zu genua. b . pilasterverzierung aus den loggien des vatikans zu rom. „ u. . füllungen in einer fensternische im vatikanischen museum daselbst. fig. i. nach einer originalaufnahme des reg.-baumeisters borkhardt in stuttgart. das Übrige entnommen aus: „letarouilly, le vatikan et la basilisque de st. pierre de rome." taf. . italienische renaissance. manuskriptmalerei, weberei und marmormosaik. v on einschneidendster bedeutung für die manuskriptmalerei war die erfindung der buchdruckerkunst: denn weil die herstellung von litterarischen erzeugnissen eine leichtere und einfachere wurde und damit auch der äufsere wert sich bedeutend ermäfsigte, so wurde auch auf die künstlerische ausschmückung durch malerei viel weniger mühe verwendet, vollends da die neu erfundene kunst auch die mittel zur herstellung schöner initialen und titelblätter an die hand gab. dennoch finden wir selbst in jener zeit noch manche als manuskriptmaler thätig: denn einmal erstreckt sich das bücherdrucken in der zeit der renaissance noch nicht so allgemein auf alle zweige der litteratur, und dann liebte man selbst bei ge- druckten werken doch ein mit der hand ausgeführtes titelblatt oder in besonderer weise verzierte, namentlich buntfarbige anfangsbuchstaben. aus diesem grunde bietet uns jene zeit noch viele beispiele schöner manuskriptmalerei, die oft ein buntes gemisch antiker, mythologischer und christlicher motive bieten. die pflanzenarabesken, wie die blätter und blumen der initialen, lassen weniger naturalistische als konventionell stylisierte formen erkennen. entschieden naturalistisch gehalten sind sie dagegen bei den vielen mit höchster sorgfalt und unendlichem fleifs ausgeführten mosaikarbeiten, die aus kleinen und gröfseren marmorstückchen der verschiedensten farben zusammengesetzt sind. mit solchen verzierungen schmückte man tischplatten, schränke u. s. w. in florenz wird heute noch diese technik mit erfolg betrieben. am meisten verwandtschaft mit dem hergebrachten aus früherer zeit zeigte die weberei, welche zwar dem einflufs des neuen sich nicht entzog, aber doch mit vorliebe auf orientalische muster zurückging. vergl. taf. . fig. — . malereien aus verschiedenen manuskripten. „ . samt-stoff im museum vaterländischer altertümer in stuttgart. „ . bordüre von einem seidenstoffe. „ . marmormosaik von einem tische im nationalmuseum zu münchen. fig. . . aufgenommen von reg.-baumeister borkhardt in stuttgart. „ u. . aufgenommen von zeichner p. haaga daselbst. das Übrige entnommen aus: „humphreys u. owen jones, the illumiuated books." „wyatt, the art of illuminating as practised in europe from the earliest times." „dupont-auberville, l'ornement des tissus." italienische renaissance. . ornamentenschatz. majolika - malerei. verl. v. jul. hoffmann, stuttgart. taf. . italienische renaissance. plastische ornamente n marmor und bronze. hainen in früheren zeiten nie gekannten aufschwung nahm die marmorskulptur. dabei unterscheiden sich hochrenaissance und frührenaissance in der richtung, dafs die erstere starke unterschneidungen des blumen- und rankenwerks, sowie des figürlichen elements liebte. die kapitäle zeigen, namentlich in der frührenais- sance , eine nahe verwandt- schaft mit solchen der korin- thischen ordnung: aber an die stelle der voluten treten jetzt vielfach pflanzliche gebilde, am häufigsten jedoch delphine, drachen, füllhörner u. s. w. gerade in diesem punkte tritt der schöpferische reichtum der renaissance so recht zu tage. auch an figürlicher aus- schmückung der kapitäle ist kein mangel. dagegen tritt fig. . das akanthusblatt spärlicher, gewöhnlich nur in einer reihe auf. —mit der hochrenaissance beginnt dann eine zeit engeren anschlusses an die antiken ordnungen , die in dieser periode sämtlich wieder zur geltung kommen. fast gar keine schranken hinsichtlich der modellierung kannte die bronzetechnik, was eine unmittelbare nachbildung der natur zur folge hatte, besonders bei vegetabilischem schmucke. wie die kunstblüte auch auf gewöhnliche gegenstände in hohem mafse eingewirkt hat, zeigen die beiden prächtigen thürklopfer. fig. i. thürsturz mit fries aus marmor im palazzo ducale zu urbino. xv. jahrhundert. „ . fries an einem marmor-kamin daselbst. n . consolkapitäl in marmor aus der kirche fonte giusta in siena. xv. jahrhundert (ende). „ . fries an einem grabmal. „ . thürumrahmung aus bronze von der thüre des ghiberti am baptisterium zu florenz. „ . lisenenfüllung in marmor vom altare in der kirche fonte giusta in siena. „ u. . thürklopfer aus bronze. „ . säulenkapitäl vom portale an der badia in florenz. fig. i — . nach photographischen aufnahmen, gezeichnet von den architekten lambert und stahl in stuttgart. herdtie, „die bauhütte". dolmetsch. wand- und decken-malerei. ornamentenschatz. verl. jul. hoffmahh, stuttgart. taf. . italienische renaissance. wand- und deckenmalerei. « t_j ngefähr mit dem jahre beginnt die zeit der sog. spätrenaissance. ihre eigentümlichkeiten auf dem gebiete der verzierenden malerei bringen namentlich die fig. und — zur anschauung. es ist nicht mehr derselbe reiz und die gleiche anmut, wie bei den schöpfungen der früh- und hochrenaissance; sondern ein kühler, mehr berechnender zug geht durch alles hindurch. die schöne harmonische verbindung des figürlichen mit dem vegetabilischen, auch das fein abgewogene verhältnis der farben zu einander ist einigermafsen im schwinden begriffen. ernüchternd wirken besonders die vielen weifsen flächen. das pflanzenornament wird weniger durchgebildet; an seine stelle treten vielfach elemente, aus welchen sich die sog. kartuschen später herausgebildet haben, und die meisten figuren zeichnen sich durch ihre künst- liche komposition nicht gerade vorteilhaft aus. auch bei der verteilung des ornaments auf der zu ver- zierenden fläche wird keineswegs die vortrefflichkeit der vorhergehenden kunstepoche auf diesem gebiete erreicht. vgl. auch tafel . fig. . bogenfeld aus dem herzoglichen saale im vatikan zu rom. „ — . einzelheiten aus den raffael'schen loggien daselbst. „ . gewölbefeld über der brunnenhalle der villa di papa giulio zu rom. „ u. . plafond-bordüren in derselben villa. „ gu. . pilasterfüllungen aus einer kapelle in s. maria aracelli zu rom. „ . bogenfüllung vom kreuzgange des klosters s. maria sopra minerva zu rom. aufgenommen von h. dolmetsch. taf. . italien. und franzÖs. renaissance. edelmetalle mit email. ei den edelmetallarbeiten handelt es sich teils um solche gegenstände, welche aus edlen met.allen hergestellt, durch kostbare steine, perlen, email noch in besonderer weise verziert wurden (z. b. schmuckgegenstände), teils um solche, bei welchen irgend ein seltenes mineral, wie lapislazuli, onyx u. dergl., oder eine schöne glasform durch anbringung von henkel, fufs, deckel u. s. w. zum prachtgefäfs oder prachtgeräte gebildet wurde. für beide arten war um die mitte des . jahrhunderts der tonangebende meister benvenuto cellini. die farben sind in ihren zusammenstellungen harmonisch gewählt. eine fülle edler linien und schöner formen darzustellen, dazu boten besonders die henkel und deckel der edlen gefäfse reiche ge- legenheit. pflanzen, tiere, menschen, oft in den wunderbarsten zusammensetzungen, überwiegen in ihrer anwendung weit gegenüber dem rein geometrischen ornament. die französische renaissance schliefst sich im grofsen und ganzen, wenigstens im . jahrhundert, bei solchen edelmetallarbeiten dem italienischen stil an, vorzüglich auch deswegen, weil gerade italienische künstler es waren, die in frankreich den neuen stil zur geltung brachten. letzteres ging natürlich im geburtslande der gotik langsam von statten und daher kommt es auch, dafs man vielfach anklänge an den gotischen stil findet, oder dafs da, wo man sich von demselben losgerissen, eine ziemliche willkür anzutreffen ist. fig. . bekrönung eines altärchens in der apollo-galerie des louvre zu paris (ital. arbeit). „ . von einer vase aus lapsislazuli in der galerie der uffizien zu florenz. (dto.) „ . deckel einer kristallschale in emailliertem gold daselbst. (dto.) „ u. . gehänge von benvenuto cellini. (dto.) ,, — . gehänge von unbekanntem meister. (französ. arbeit.) „ u. . henkel an gefäfsen in der apollo-galerie des louvre zu paris. (dto.) n nu. . masken an einem schilde daselbst. (dto.) „ u. . fufs und oberteil eines wasserkrugs daselbst. (dto.) r — . bordüren an gefäfsen in derselben sammlung. (dto.) fig. u. . nach aufnahmen des reg.-baumeisters borkhardt in stuttgart. „ , , u. . nach aufnahmen des fabrikanten c. baur in biberach. das uebrige entnommen aus: dalluz, le tresor artistique de la france. daly, revue general de l'architecture et des travaux publics. labarte, histoire des arts industriels au moyen äge et ä l'epoque de la renaissance. italienische und franzÖsische renaissance. h. dolmetsch. »' . ». edelmetallarbeiten mit email. ornamentenschatz. verl. v. jul. hoffmann, stuttgart tdolmetsch typographische -verzierungen. ornamentenschatz. verl. v. jul. hoffmann , stuttgart franzÖsische renaissance. . taf. . franzÖsische renaissance. teppich-malerei. ./~\us der zeit der gotik wurde die vorliebe für teppichartige bemalung der wohnräume herüber- genommen in die periode der renaissance. doch schlägt gerade hier, trotz mannigfachen zurückgreifens auf antike formen, die gotische ueberlieferung sehr oft durch, oder aber sind es wieder orientalische anklänge (vergl. fig. . u. ), welche die ausbildung einer reinen renaissance hindern. die bemalung wurde gewöhnlich in der art ausgeführt, dass etwa die zwei unteren drittel der wände mit einem volleren und schwereren, der obere teil dagegen mit einem einfacheren und leichteren muster bedeckt war 'vergl. fig. u. ). wo rankenwerk vorkommt, ist es fast immer stark stilisiert; eine grosse rolle im ornament spielen die namenszüge (anfangsbuchstaben) der herrscher, sowie kronen und das königliche abzeichen von frankreich, die lilie. — bei den farben sind gebrochene töne beliebt, gold ist häufig verwendet. fig. — . gemalte teppichmuster im schlosse zu blois aus der zeit franz i. (fig. wurde aus versehen verkehrt gezeichnet.) entnommen aus: le nai], le chdteau de blois. taf. . franzÖsische renaissance. plastische verzierungen in stein und holz. t^.einer von fremden bestandteilen als auf andern gebieten zeigt sich die französische renaissance in der plastik. fein, und edel tritt namentlich in der ersten zeit das ornament bei flach- und hochreliefs auf. es ist da fast ausnahmslos mischornament, bei welchem die kartuschen (umrahmungen) mit ihren zu mannigfaltigster gestaltung reizenden formen eine wichtige rolle spielen. in der frührenaissance sind die kartuschen noch ziemlich einfach gehalten, werden aber mit der zeit reicher und mit kräftigeren einrollurigen gebildet. — wie bei der italienischen renaissance ist das akanthusblatt besonders beliebt, das je nach der zeit eine leichtere oder derbere behandlung erfährt. die pilaster und säulen tragen an ihren schäften reichen schmuck; die kapitäle weisen oft eigen- tümliche kompositionen auf, welche zwar mitunter überladen sind, aber auch nicht selten einer gewissen zierlichkeit keineswegs entbehren. fig. . pilasterkapitäl von einem kamin im hotel lasbordes zu toulouse (franz i.. ,. . geschnitzte füllung am wandgetäfer der galerie franz i. im schlosse zu fontainebleau. ,. . geschnitztes füllungsornament von einer thüre im justizpalaste zu dijon (franz i. bis heinrich ii.). „ . wulstverzierung in der kapelle des schlosses zu anet (heinrich il). ,. . verzierung einer fensterumrahmung am louvre zu paris (heinrich il). ,. . holzrosette aus der galerie heinrichs ii. im schlosse zu fontainebleau. ., . rosette von einem kamin im schlosse zu anet (heinrich il). ,. . herme aus dem hotel d'assezat zu toulouse (heinrich il). „ . füllung an einem kamin im museum des hotel de cluny zu paris 'heinrich il). r . in holz geschnitzte füllung an einer thüre der kapelle beim schlosse zu anet heinrich il). r . kapitäl vom baptisterium ludwigs xiii. im schlosse zu fontainebleau. nach photographien, sowie nach: sauvageot, palais, chäteaux, hötels et maisons de france du xv. au xviii. siecle. daly, motifs historiques d'architcclure et de sculpture d'ornement. i'fnor, monographie du chateau d'anet. ,, „ ,, palais de fontainebleau. franzÖsische renaissance. . {"dolmetsch. plastische verzierungen in stein und holz. ornamentenschatz. verl. v. jul. hoffmann , stuttgart. franzÖsische renaissance. weberei, stickerei und bucheinbÄnde. taf. . franzÖsische renaissance. wandmalerei, bemalte skulptur, bucheinbÄnde und weberei. ,/\.uf dieser tafel kommt der unterschied der früheren und späteren renaissance in frankreich so recht zum vorschein. während fig. i und elegante aber mafsvolle bewegung, fig. und sogar eine gewisse starrheit der etwas derben formen zur schau tragen, ist bei fig. alles in thätigkeit und voll leben; selbst die fruchtgewinde scheinen im winde zu schwanken. auch die anordnung und verbindung der einzelnen gruppen, wie der übergrofse reichtum an figürlichem weisen auf eine zeit hin, wo der grund- satz weiser mäfsigung nicht mehr so sehr im vordergrund des künstlerischen schaffens stand. dieser mangel des mafshaltens tritt auch bei den beiden ruchdecken fig. und hervor, welche uns eine andere verzierungsart als die auf tafel , fig. — , angegebene vor augen führen. fig. — , , lassen uns erkennen, dass bei der bemalung plastischer ornamente wenige farben zur anwendung kamen, dafs aber gold stets vorherrschte. letzteres war bei stuckverzierungen überhaupt oft die einzige farbe, die höchstens durch einen farbigen grund noch herausgehoben wurde. (vergleiche fig. io und ii.; fig. . gemalter fries zu beiden seiten eines kamins im hotel d'aluie zu blois. stil: louis xii. (i. hälfte des xvi. jahrhunderts.) . , . in holz geschnitzte füllung aus dem schlosse zu gaillon. stil: louis xii. (i. hälfte des xvi. jahrh.) .. u. . geschnitzte und bemalte unterzugs-füllungen an einer decke im assisen-hofe zu dijon. stil: francois i. (i. hälfte des xvi. jahrh.) , . geschnitzte und bemalte decken-füllung aus dem zimmer der diana im schlosse zu anet. stil: henri ii. mitte des xvi. jahrh.) , u. . französische bucheinbände. ii. hälfte des xvi. jahrh.) r . gemalte wandfüllung in der bibliothek des arsenals zu paris. 'stil: henri iv.—louis xiii. (i. hälfte des xvii. jahrh.) . . . gemalter wandfries aus dem schlosse zu fontainebleau. stil: louis xiii. (i. hälfte des xvii. jahrh.) u. . bemalte stuckfriese aus der galerie des apollo im louvre zu paris (von berain). stil: louis xiv. (ii. hälfte des xvii. jahrh.) . . bordüre von einem gobelinteppich (von le brun). stil: louis xiv. (ii. hälfte des xvii. jahrh. entnommen aus den werken: „daly, c, motifs historiques d'architecture et de sculpture d'ornement." „guiffrey, histoire generale de la tapisserie." „monuments in^dits ou peu connus, faisant partie du cabinet de guillaume libri." ., 'fnor, monographie du palais de fontainebleau." „reiber et sauvageot, l'art pour tous" taf. . ■*. franzÖsische renaissance. i t gobelin-weberei. £ ■ #■ schon früher ist darauf hingewiesen worden, dafs die teppichartig bemalten fenster ihre entstehung- dem gebrauch verdanken, die lichtöffnungen durch teppiche zu verhängen; die in gleicher art behan- delten wandflächen, denen man dadurch ein wohnlicheres und schöneres aussehen gab, wurden im laufe der zeit ebenfalls mit farben, d. h. mit bildern oder einfachen zeichnungen versehen. allein die ver- wendung von teppichen für solche zwecke hörte damit nicht auf und besonders vom . jahrhundert an kamen wieder in den häusern der grossen jene teppiche als wandschmuck zur geltung, namentlich als die in den niederlanden gewobenen wollenen tapeten mit allerlei figürlichen darstellungen sich den welt- markt eroberten und die aus seide oder leinwand hergestellten verdrängten. so wurde denn auch in frankreich unter ludwig xiv. eine solche teppichweberei angelegt und zwar in der fabrik der gebrüder gobelin, nach welchen die dort gefertigten teppiche und dann überhaupt alle dieser gattung den namen rgobelins" erhielten. obwohl ihre herstellung eine überaus schwierige und mühsame ist, so zeigt doch ein blick auf unsere tafel, dafs diese art von malerei eigentlich weder in den farben noch in den formen unüber- windliche hindernisse findet. fig. — . bordüren an einem teppich nach le brun (gefertigt — ). ,. — . bordüre von einem teppich nach noel coypel (gefertigt — ). r . ,. ,. ,. ,. des xvi. jahrhunderts. entnommen aus: „histoire generale de la tapisserie." „guichard et darcel, les tapisseries decoratives du garde-meuble." „ualy, revue generale de l'architecture et des travaux public«." iha unis 'nnvwjjoh nnr ■v nulk .ianaaam-nnaaoo zlah sn n hakho ■qosiau |oq 'h . ' nvssivm h h sisozmvh taf. . franzÖsische und deutsche renaissance. flachornamente verschiedener techniken. tiinen besonderen reiz haben die erzeugnisse der verschiedenen handwerke aus jener zeit, da die kunst an der verzierung gewerblicher gegenstände sich lebhaft beteiligte. waffen, kästchen, geräte des täglichen gebrauchs u. s. w. zeigen den mannigfaltigsten schmuck, der bei holz durch einlage von elfenbein u. s. w., bei metall besonders durch gravierung und aetzung angebracht wurde. zu fig. — ist zu bemerken, dafs die sog. fayencen (auch henri-deux-gefässe nach der zeit ihrer ungefähren entstehung genannt) ihren namen von einem französischen schlosse haben, wo während der ersten hälfte des . jahrhunderts diese thonwaren verfertigt wurden. ihre eigentümlichkeit besteht darin, dafs die ornamente und figuren niello-artig auf die oberfläche aufgetragen sind; der grund wurde wahrscheinlich je nach bedürfnis entweder durch einen model oder durch ein werkzeug vertieft und diese vertiefungen mit einer meist gelb und braungefärbten masse ausgefüllt. fig. . boulearbeit von einer wanduhr im museum vaterländischer altertümer in stuttgart (französisch). „ u. . elfenbeineinlagen in ebenholz an einem tische daselbst (deutsch). ,, . holzeinlage von einem himmelbett im goldenen saale zu urach (deutsch). ., u. . holzeinlage an einer wandvertiefung im justizpalast zu dijon (franz.). ., . holzeinlage von einem schranke in ravensburg (deutsch). . silbereinlage an einem goldenen humpen in der schatzkammer des bayr. königshauses in münchen (deutsch). .. . elfenbeineinlage an einer pistole im kgl. historischen museum zu dresden (deutsch). .. . flachrelief von einem himmelbette im goldenen saale zu urach (deutsch). „ . desgl. von einer holzrahme mit vergoldetem grunde im muse de cluny zu paris (franz.). „ . motiv zu einer aetz- oder gravierarbeit von peter flötner (deutsch). „ . eisenätzarbeit an einem vorhängeschlofs aus dem stift heiligenkreuz im k. k. österr. , museum f. k. und i. in wien (deutsch). „ . eisenätzung an einer säge im kgl. historischen museum zu dresden (deutsch). ., u. . bordürchen auf dem deckel einer vergoldeten silberkassette von wenzel jamnitzer in der schatzkammer des bayr. königshauses in münchen (deutsch). ,, . motiv zu einer aetz- oder gravierarbeit (unbekannter deutscher meister). t u. . bordürchen an oiron-gefässen im museum des louvre zu paris (franz.). „ u. . flächenmuster an oiron-gefässen daselbst (franz.). fig. nach aufnahme des fabrikanten c. baur in biberach. ., ,, ,, zeichenlehrers bosch in ravensburg. — u. nach aufnahme des zeichners paul haaga in stuttgart. das Übrige entnommen aus: „sauvageot, palais, chäteaux, hotels et maisons de france du xv. au xviii. siecle." „reynard, ornements des aneiens mattres." „sauvageot, musee imperial du louvre." sowie nach verschiedenen photographischen aufnahmen. franzÖsische und deutsche renaissance. . sllll h. dolmetsch ornamentenschatz. flachornamente verschiedener techniken. verl. v. jul. hoffmann, stuttgart. . deutsche renaissance. taf. . deutsche renaissance. metall-arbeiten. vv ir haben es bei unserer tafel zunächst nur mit einem besonderen zweige des so vieles umfassenden gebietes der metallarbeiten zu thun, nämlich mit erzeugnissen der sogenannten l'lattner- oder harnisch- arbeiter. lange zeit galten viele waffen und rüstungen wegen ihres, mit staunenswertem kunstsinn und geradezu unendlicher abwechslung in ranken-, rahmen- und riemenwerk verzierten Überfläche als werke der gröfsten italienischen meister, welche jene namentlich am französischen hofe hergestellt hätten. vor einigen jahrzehnten wurde jedoch die überraschende entdeckung gemacht, dafs die meisten und zwar gerade die schönsten dieser gegenstände deutschen ursprung haben, da hauptsächlich deutsche meister es waren, die zu diesem zwecke nach "rankreich von eranz i. und heinrich ii. berufen wurden. diese harnische, schilde, helme u. s. w. sind teils mit ganzen bildlichen darstellungen, teils mit einzelnen figuren, tieren, vögeln, fabelwesen, mit blumen und rankenwerk in der prächtigsten weise verziert; in der späteren zeit bekamen dann allerdings die schnörkel und eingerollten händer, sowie die kartuschen das ucbergewicht, wie in der italienischen und französischen renaissance, so dafs jenes feinere vegetabilische ornament der früheren zeit zurücktreten mufste. zur anwendung kam bald das actzen, bald das ziselieren, bald das tauschieren der metalle, noch häufiger aber wurden die platten getrieben, so dafs die zeichnungen erhaben hervortraten. fig i— . abbildungen von rüstungen aus dem kabinet der handzeichnungen alter meister in münchen. entnommen aus: „l ef n er-ai ten eck , urijjiiial-entwitrfc deutscher meister ftlr prachlrüstungen französischer könige.' u taf. . deutsche renaissance. bemalte plastik. j- reude an lebensfrischer darstellung war es, was die künstler der renaissance veranlafste, ihre plastischen gebilde durch farben zu beleben. so ist die grofse prachtvolle decke im rittersaale des schlosses zu heiligenberg fast ganz mit farben bedeckt, die in schönster harmonie untereinander dazu dienen, die plastischen gebilde erst recht hervorzuheben. fbenso bekommen die beiden geweihhalter und die mittelfigur durch die bemalung einen eigenen reiz, welcher dem blofsen holz- oder steinbildwerk abgegangen wäre. auch bei der holz- und steinskulptur der späteren deutschen renaissance ist ein uberwiegen der kartuschen und des bandwerks zu bemerken, welch' letzteres zu mannigfachen interessanten verschlingungen und durchschiebungen gelegenheit bietet. die weibliche gestalt bei fig. stellt die gemahlin des frbnuers des lusthauses, des herzogs ludwig, ursula, geb. pfalzgräfin bei rhein, dar. in dem leider nicht mehr vorhandenen lusthause stand auf der abgebildeten konsole jedoch eine andere figur, auf welche das wappen sich bezieht. gegen derartige gewölbeanfänger zierten einst die jene prachtbauten umgebenden arkadengänge. fig. — . teile von der bemalten holzdccke im rittersaale des schlosses zu heiligenberg. „ . gewölbeanfänger von den arkadengängen des ehemaligen lusthauses zu stuttgart. „ u. . aus birnbaumholz geschnitzte wandschilder im museum vaterländischer altertümer daselbst, zu der ehemaligen ausstattung eines jagdzimmers der familie besserer zu ulm gehörend. in den ovalen mittelfeldern sind geschnitzte hirschköpfe mit seltenen geweihen befestigt. f't!t. i — . nach aufnahmen von ii. dolmetsch. ,, m — - , n zeichner p. ilaaga in sttitltrart. tierichtiirun!;. im text zu tafel s lies zeile von oben „die rojt. oiron-fayencen". deutsche renaissance. h. dolmetsch bucheinbÄnde. vehl, .. jul. holtmann, stunfiaht taf. . deutsche renaissance. bucheinbÄnde. z-.u bucheinbänden, deren ornamente in der guten zeit stets flach behandelt wurden, pflegte man fast immer leder zu verwenden. in der ersten zeit schnitt man die umrisse der zeichnung scharf ein und vertiefte die von derselben nicht bedeckte fläche. später dagegen nahm man kleine metallstempel zu hilfe, deren muster durch aneinanderreihung die den einband umrahmende bordüre hervorbrachten. die ecken sind in diesem falle nicht besonders ausgebildet, sondern die bordüren laufen hier willkürlich zusammen. — solche bordüren umsäumen die buchdecke oft in mehreren reihen und eine allzugrofse schlankheit des mittleren noch übrigen feldes wird durch einschaltung besonderer querbordüren, entlang den schmalseiten verhindert, was man häufig auch dadurch erreichte, dafs die stempelmuster doppelreihig und symmetrisch zu einander eingeschlagen oder eingeprefst wurden (fig. und ). die gewöhnlich kleinen mittelfelder sind dann entweder mit stoffmustern oder mit eck- und mittelstücken verziert (fig. — , , , — , — zeigen muster letzterer art). daneben kamen aber auch bei manchen einbänden freie, oft farbige arabesken und bänder- verschlingungen vor vergl. taf. , fig. und ), welche in der blütezeit noch bordürenumrahmung haben, während diese später weggelassen und oft eckstücke angefügt wurden, die sehr lebhaft an metall- beschläge erinnern. am kostbarsten waren natürlich einbände mit wirklichem metallbeschläg, namentlich wenn dies aus edlem metall bestand. die verzierung ist dann in der regel plastisch gegossen oder getrieben. fig. dagegen zeigt ein einfaches, ausgesägtes und sodann graviertes ornament aus silber. noch sei erwähnt, dafs bei der ausschmückung des bücherrückens die schnürung in hübscher weise verwertet wurde, indem dieselbe entweder durch wülste in leder oder durch vertiefte horizontale linien angedeutet und dadurch eine teilung hervorgebracht wurde. die dann entstehenden felder wurden mit einfachen ornamenten ausgefüllt. fig. i. in silber beschlagene buchdecke (natürliche gröfse) aus der sammlung vaterländischer altertümer in stuttgart. „ — . verzierungen an schweinslederbänden (in blinddruck hergestellt) aus der königlichen handbibliothek zu stuttgart. aufgenommen von h. dolmetsch. deutsche renaissance. stickerei. ornamentenschatz. verl. v. jul hoffmann, stutt ak deutsche renaissance. . löolmetsch. typographische verzierungen. ornamentenschatz. verl. v. jul. hoffmann , stuttgart. taf. . . deutsche renaissance. bemalte plastik. freiliegende abbildungen bringen weitere einzelheiten von der bei tafel erwähnten becke im grofsen rittersaale des schlosses heiligenberg zur anschauung. diese decke ist ganz aus lindenholz geschnitzt und in reichster weise farbig, namentlich mit blau, rot, grün, gold und silber behandelt. aber • trotz diesem farbenreichtum und der überraschend grofsen mannigfaltigkeit von blätterranken, bandwerk, figuren u. s. w. macht sie doch keinen überladenen und unruhigen eindruck, sondern die gesamtwirkung ist, wie früher bemerkt, durchaus angenehm und harmonisch für das auge. fig. — aufgenommen von h. dolmetsch. deutsche renaissance. . h. dolmetsch. plastische verzierungen in stein. ornamentenschatz. verlag v. jul. hoffmann. stuttgart. taf. . deutsche renaissance. wand- und deckenmalerei. izline prächtige, wenn auch ganz besondere art der wandmalerei führt uns die beiliegende tafel vor augen. der sog. goldene saal im schlosse zu urach ist ganz in dieser weise geschmückt. die wände sind im allgemeinen glatt, aber durch die malerei in felder eingeteilt und diese zeigen durchgängig eine verzierung, die unwillkürlich an vorbilder aus der eisentechnik erinnert. besonders tritt dies zu tage bei den mannigfachen durchschlingungen und umrahmungen. der in letzteren in häuf ger wiederholung sich findende palmbaum mit dem wahlspruch „attempto" (s. fig. ) weist zwar auf die regierung eberhards im bart hin, allein die malerei und die architektur des saales dürfen wir mit zweifelloser sicherheit in das letzte drittel des . jahrhunderts verlegen. an der einfach geschmückten decke sind die sichtbaren balken braunrot, dagegen die schmalen zwischenfelder hell. trotz der beschränkung auf wenige farben (braunrot, weifs, gold und blau) ist die malerei von ebenso schöner als angenehmer wirkung. fig. . bogen-zwickel an wandfeldern. „ . füllung in einer fensterleibung. ,, u. . säulenverzierungen. „ . verzierung an den fensterbrüstungen. „ u. . mittel- und eckstücke an den umrahmungsfriesen der wandfelder. „ — . dekoration an den deckenbalken mit erhabenen holzrosetten und knöpfen. „ . thürverdachung von holz. sämtliches aus dem goldenen saale zu urach. aufgenommen von zeichner paul haaga in stuttgart. r xvii. und xviii. jahrhundert. verlag ». jul. hoffmann. stuttgart taf. . xvh und xviii. jahrhundert. wand- und deckendekorationen in stuck, malerei und lederpressung. j- ig. ist besonders dazu geeignet, uns ein bild von dem wesen des rokoko (stil ludwigs xv.) vor die augen zu führen. hier, wie auf tafel , fig. — , sehen wir die unglaublichste willkür in der behand- lung der linien, eine ucberfülle von blumen- und rankenwerk, von kartuschen, eine ueberladung mit dekorativen elementen. genien, überhaupt figuren werden überall angebracht und grofs ist die vorliebe für allegorien und embleme. besonders zu beachten ist, dass die dekoration ganz selbständig auftritt, ohne sich dem konstruktiven kern unterzuordnen. dabei lässt sich aber nicht leugnen, dafs die schöpfungen des rokoko häufig eine überaus zierliche und lebendige, wenn auch eigentümliche und kecke ornamentik aufweisen. bewunderungswürdig ist bei diesem stile auch das harmonische zusammenwirken von archi- tektur, skulptur und malerei, wie es sich sonst selten findet. fig. . gepresstc ledertapete im st le ludwigs xiv. aus der sammlung vaterländischer altertümer zu stuttgart. „ . deckendekoration aus dem schlosse zu bruchsal. „ . bemalte thürfüllung aus einem herrschaftsgebäude in paris, lig. . aufgenommen von zeichner paul haaga in stuttgart. „ . „ „ h. dolmetsch. „ . entnommen aus: daly, motifs historiques d'architecture et de sculpture ivornement. xviii. jahrhundert. h. dolmetsch. plastische und gemalte verzierungen. verlag v. jul hoffmann stuttgart xvii. und xviii. jahrhundert. . h. dolmetsch. bortenwirkerei, weberei und stickerei. ornamentenschatz. verl. v. jttl. hoffmann, stuttgart. tut'. . xvii. und xvhi. jahrhundert. bortenwirkerei, weberei und stickerei. die zuletzt besprochenen stilarten übten einen weitreichenden einflufs nicht nur auf die ausstattung der wohnräume, sondern namentlich auch auf die ausschmückung sämtlicher bckleidungsgegenstände aus. auch hier lassen sich bestimmte unterschiede unschwer erkennen. so weist bei fig. , , die strengere stilisierung noch auf einen gewissen zusammenhang mit der renaissance hin, während fig. u. , dann aber besonders fig. u. das wachsende uebergewicht des naturalismus zur geltung bringen. fig. . borte im stile ludwigs xiv. im besitze des möbelfabrikanten c. baur in biberach. „ . stickerei an einer seidenen weste. (ludwig xiv.; - - » an einem seidenen rock .ludwig xv.) aus der sammlung vaterländischer alter tümer zu stuttgart. „ seidenstickerei von einer samtwestc. (ludwig xvi.) (ebendaselbst.) „ . scidengewebe von einem mefsgewand. (ludwig xiv.) „ . gewobener seidenstoff für kleider. (ludwig xv.) „ . gewobener stoff aus seide und wolle. (ludwig xvi.)' fig. i aufgenommen ron architekt blum er in stuttgart. fig. aufgenommen von zeichner paul haaga daselbst. das l'ebrigc entnommen aus: hoftmann, les arts et l'industrie. sachliches verzeichnis. actzarbeit taf. . akroterien . anthemien-verzierungen . architektur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . architektur, polychrome . basreliefs, bemalte . bortenwirkerei . bronzen . . bucheinbände . . . edelmetalle mit email . . elfenbeineinlagen . email-malerei . . . . . . . . . . fassadenmalerei . fayencemalerei . . fayenceplatten . flachornament . flachreliefs . geflechte . glasmalerei . . . . glasstiftmosaik . . gobelinweberei . goldschmiedearbeit . . . . gravierarbeit . grubenschmelz . holz,einlagen . . . . holzverzierungen . . . . . initialen . . . . . - intarsien . . . . . . kandelaber . . . kapitäle . . . . . . . . . . kartuschen . . . karyatide . . . keramik . . . . . . . . . . lackmalerei . . . ledertapeten gepresste . . leinenstickerei . mäander taf. . majolikaarbeiten . malerei . . . . . . . . . . . . . manuskriptmalerei . . . . . . . . marmoreinlagen . marmormosaik . marmorornamente . metallarbeiten . . . . : . . . . . . metalleinlagen . . modeldruckerei . mosaikarbeiten . . . . . . . mosaikfussboden . . . . niello-arbeiten . . ornamente, plastische . . . . ornamentik . . . . . . . . plastik . . . . . . . . . . . . . . plastik, bemalte . . . . . . . robbiaarbeiten . sgraffiten . skulptur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . skulpturen, bemalte . . . . . . . spitzentechnik . stickerei . . . . . . . . . . . . . tauschier-arbeiten . . . teppichmalerei . . teppichweberei . thon glasierter . . . typographische verzierungen . . verzierungen, typographische . . wand- und deckenmalerei . . . . . . - . . . . . weberei . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . zellenschmelz . . ziegelstein, glasierter . "甘​'ⅢⅠ拙​児​。。""'e 0h ヂ​旺​肝​針​鷲​鴛​ぬ​㍼ "漣 ​掻​@,,@三 ​移​刃 ​㌔" ナ​Ⅰ 蜜 ​ 申​ミ​@丈​,キヒ​の​エ ​ モ​婁 ​ ①コ​ヴ​㏄の​仁​コ​が​仁​ピ​,且​全​㎝ で​ノ​仁​①巨​①巳​Ⅱ ' Ⅹ@aⅠ@ 汚名​ レ​お ​ト​~ん​リ​千 ​ ,ム ​彗​き​蚕​巳​き​・東 ​むり​巳​㎡㎝㏄戸​仁​㏄し​c功​二​ヒ ​ 、ヌ​一​・ぎ​- :丘​ま​,ム ​)@@Ⅱ@ ⅡⅡ@@@ 江​。め​Ⅰ斗​。む​d舛​寸​八​母​づ​レ​め ​一 ​申 ​ゲ​仁​c・「ゲト​c仁​比​@@ ヒ​、 @ 紳​研​ぬ​"紡​鰍​励​紘 ​は​「olentwo「佗​n) ゑ​「@iⅡざ ​ 汚​尚​斥 ​ drinking-cups, vases, ewers and ornamentsvirgil solis 了​! 上 ​ . 非 ​- 。 , . img.c om solle ob viin viiendo il errr. drinking-cups vaſes ewers and ornaments deſigned for the uſe of gold and silverſmiths twenty-one fac-similes of extremely rare etchings by virgil solis london james rimell oxford street :: uuu virgil solis. aga r virgil solis, a german engraver, born at l nuremberg in . according to the / uſage of the time, he engraved both on wood mehvor and on copper, chiefly from his own deſigns. the copper-plates he engraved in the early part of his life reſemble the works of hans sebald beham ; but when he afterwards engraved after the italian maſters, he adopted a ſtyle more open and ſpirited. his wooden cuts are ſimilar to thoſe of joft ammon, both with reſpect to the compoſition and execution. his works prove him to have been a man of conſiderable ability, and, though his deſign is formal and ſtiff, ſome of his figures poſſeſs great merit. on account of the ſmallneſs of his plates, this artiſt is ranked among the little maſters. his works are very numerous, amounting to upwards of eight hundred prints. he uſually marked them with a cipher compared:of a y.and an s. there has been conſiderable diſcuſſion reſpecting virgilius solis, particularly whether he ever. engraved in wood. zani ſays, decidedly,“ non ha mai inciſo in legno.” perhaps all that need be ſaid on the matter is concentrated in the preliminary remarks of bartſch to the catalogue of his prints in tom. ix. of “ le peintre graveur,” of which the following is the ſub- ſtance :—“ the little we know of the hiſtory of virgilius solis is ſupplied by an inſcription at the bottom of his portrait . lenchies சசன்னையா won h t gbh vode chos www bang - odva th "uwidowanos doudou innotmits coro meargd. leuchcer ) ; : tan geſchie क itiile sj دان به کار د کنار g cm und hun wando terima hem ཨ ***** ་ ༠་༠ 。。。、 ༤་པོ་ ་་ལ་་ , འ ལམི - ཁ པ ཕ བ བ བ དང བསམ་ . - ト ​ ichme - - - - - - - - கர் t e % in : ei " a tla . * na omon tooooooododdoo store Надира и не и е ИИИИИИИИИИИИИ នង និង songសកម្មហង់មួយសេង មកបងឬ បានមករួមក្នុងការបង ក សមe a reបន្ទាន់បងសប្រឥy bnxryukyu សង់ត្រង់. in - my loka , the new york public library reference department this book is under no circumstances to be taken from the building elementary principles of ornamentjames ward university of wisconsin library. uis ■ wv-^- w elementary principles of ornament. elementary principles of ornament james ward t • head master of the macclesfield school op art london chapman and hall, limited s richard clay and sons, limited, london and bungay. - preface. the contents of this book chiefly consist of a series of class lectures, delivered to the students of the macclesfield school of art. they are published in the hope that they may be useful to general students in art, and more particularly to those who are specially interested in the subject of decorative design. the illustrations are merely intended as blackboard dia- grams, and were used as such when the lectures were given. i have added to the lectures in this book a glossary of terms commonly used in orna- ment. as a text-book for candidates who wish to sit for the government third grade examination in the "elementary principles of ornament," i trust it may be found serviceable. j. ward. macclesfield, . contents. chapter i. page definition of ornament—methods of expression—straight lined ornament i chapter ii. the curved line in ornament—explanation of the lead- ing principles io chapter iii. the proper decoration of mouldings—the ornamental treatment of walls, ceilings, and floors—relief modelled work chapter iv. the proper and improper shapes of planes—uniformity— selection and arrangement of decorative elements— painted ornament—division of forms and shapes in architecture, &c elementary thing is required to be done with it before we can give it that name. to make an ornamental design, the units of the decorative material must be arranged and brought to order; repetition and symmetry may not be illustrated, but even distribution, order, and balance of masses must be. when a design or pattern ceases to appear orderly, it is no longer ornament. the sketch at fig. is an attempt to illustrate ornament by using the same ele- ments as in fig. i, and adding to them the principles of even distribution, at the same time having a due regard to the boundary-lines of the panel in the general arrangement. dependent or applied ornament is that which is specially designed and fitted for the position it occupies. independent ornament is of the nature of such things as shields, medallions, labels, emblems, and devices, with or without inclosing frames, paterae, crests, swags, or principles of ornament. festoons, and other properties; that is, they may be used alone, or in combination with other dependent ornament. numerous examples may be quoted of inappropriate ornament. as a rule, any kind of ornament that is not governed by its plan, or falsely constructed from an archi- tectural point of view, may be called inappropriate. for instance, if upright panels and pilasters were decorated with ornament running in oblique lines, or with a strongly-marked series of horizontal bands.; or a carpet pattern designed to run in one particular direction; or columns used in decoration, but supporting nothing ; con- soles or brackets turned upside down (a frequent occur- rence) ; mouldings that are round and elliptical in section, decorated with frets and straight-lined ornament; panels overloaded with mouldings; forms organic or otherwise used together, but out of scale with one another; things made to simulate what they are not; any excess of enrich- ment,—all this may safely be classed as inappropriate ornament. methods of expression.—broadly speaking, ornament is expressed in three different ways: first, in pure outline, as traced with a point; second, in flat tints, where breadth is added, as in painting with the brush; and third, in relief or raised work, as in modelling and sculp- ture. these three divisions may be subdivided to almost any extent, but theoretically considering the subject, all the subdivisions are but varieties of the first three species. looking at these varieties in detail, we find amongst them relief or modelled ornament, with no other outline than that given by light and shade; the same, with the addi- tion of colour, say in two shades—one for the ornament, and one for the background, the expressions here being more defined; the same again with the forms and back- ground "picked out" in a variety of colours, giving a still more prominent character by the colour contrasts. painted ornament in light and shade, with the addition of colour, is an imitation of the latter: this we will notice again. b elementary going back to ornament expressed in outline, under this head is classed all the early decorative work by mankind, whether on the prehistoric bone-etchings or on pottery. the decoration on the assyrian limestone cylinders, and bronze dishes and tablets of the same nation, the incised work on the greek and etruscan cista and hand-mirrors, is expressed in outline. sgraffito-viotv. is a kind of outline ornament cut in plaster revealing a different colour of plaster underneath. the antique vase paintings were executed chiefly in out- line. copper-plate engraved work and glass etching might also be classed as work done in outline. ornament on a flat surface, with the addition of colour, forms a large class in itself, and is a common method of expression in decoration. for examples, in illustra- tion, note all arabesque painted ornament, whether poly- chromatic or in "grisaille": the latter being ornament painted in monochrome-grey (or the tints of black and white), in imitation of relief-work; illuminated manu- scripts, and the borders of the same known technically as "illumination." the word " arabesque," used above, is de- rived from the moresque or arabian ornament. the plant, fruit, flower, and geometric forms used by the arabians to decorate their walls, floors, and ceilings (the human and animal forms being forbidden by their religion) were called arabesques; but what we understand now really as arabesques, originated from the high-class painted ornament of the ancient romans and greeks, used by them to decorate the walls and ceilings of temples, houses, and tombs. everything almost was represented in the animal and vegetable kingdoms; the materials and elements in their composition were usually arranged and composed on a geometric, or, more often, on a scroll- work, basis. the discovery of this decorative painting in the ancient baths of titus led raphael to adopt the style, and to improve on it, by introducing allegory and higher-class features as new elements. it may be said, the culminating point in arabesque painting was reached principles of ornament. by him and his chief pupil in ornament, giovanni udina, in that great work, the decoration of the loggia of the vatican. pursuing the subject of ornament on a flat surface in colour, more examples are: inlaid wood-work or wood-mosaic, called "parquetry" when applied to floors, generally used in two colours or kinds of wood; marquetry is also inlaid wood-work, generally practised on a smaller scale for cabinets, small boxes, and other things. stone and metal are also used with the wood, in small cubical forms. tunbridge wells, in kent, is famous for this kind of work. "tarsia" is another form of the same sort of thing, views of buildings being the chief subjects chosen for representation, besides other ornament. this art was extensively practised by the venetians in the fifteenth century: the woods employed were usually walnut and boxwood ; panels in chair-backs, coffers, and church choirs were the favourite subjects for this kind of decoration. glass and marble mosaic, en- amels, and stained glass belonged to the same division. stencilling; pattern-weaving in textile fabrics; block and roller printing, both in fabrics and paper-hangings, and also in floor-cloths; tesselated pavements and tiles— all belong to the category of ornament on a flat surface, separated by colours in juxtaposition. ornament is ex- pressed in damask cloths and hangings by the changes and crossing of warp and weft, and is shown in flat tints of two shades. the expression of ornament in fret-work, piercing, lace, filigree, wire-work, and wrought-iron, is of a similar class and character, and is generally termed "open-work." the next division for our consideration will be the "elementary forms " used in ornament. it is assumed that the spaces are given we are required to ornament, such as a ceiling, a wall, a carpet, frieze, or door-panel. the boundary-lines are, of course, the inclosing lines of our space or field, which may be subdivided into smaller panels, with or without borders. this subdividing is called the " setting-out." we have now to think of the principles of ornament. origin; is a japanese key pattern, constructed on a mesh or net-work of squares; and fig. is derived elementary from the plaiting of straws, and is a straight-lined sort of ornament, common to prehistoric and byzantine work. frets are decidedly more appropriate to flat surfaces than to concave or convex ones; they may, however, be lis . used on slightly concave surfaces, such as the inside hollows of plates or dishes, then their vertical lines will compose well, bv radiating from the centre of the plate. the square within square, and double and single fret, principles of ornament. shown at fig. , were often used by the greeks, and earlier by the egyptians, on the ceilings of their tombs, both singly and in combination with spirals and circular flower ornaments, alternating with each other, as in bands and border ornament. i lozenge and diamond shapes are other elements of straight-lined ornament, and form the basis of many repeating patterns in textile fabrics, paper-hangings, and titles. hexagons, octagons, and triangles are also used largely as constructive bases in pattern-designing: but, after all, these forms may be reduced to the square and the circle. elementary principles of ornament. n swag is formed of links and hangs like a chain, it is called a catenary, and as an element is identical with the line observed in festoons and loopings of drapery. looking at the illustrations, we have in fig. circles touching each other; this arrangement is the basis of endless diaper patterns and repeating forms. next we come to circles intersecting each other, in fig. , a simple and very satisfactory kind of pattern, common + alike to early egyptian, arabian, and japanese diapers. fig. is a simple border ornament made of circles and segments. an effective disk border like that made from the cut shells of the savage tribes is shown at fig. , and a more important development of the latter is that of fig. ; this is taken from assyrian tesserae, small oblong pieces of stone or metal, and the decoration here shown elementary was incised in the surface of the material, often alternating with the guitloche pattern (figs. , and ). the latter pattern was a very important one in assyrian work, and in greek moulding decoration, and painted flat ornament. the above-mentioned tessera; were used as tickets of admission to the theatres of antiquity. figs. and are further examples of ornament principles of ornament. obtained from the circle and its segments; the former being the gothic ball-flower decoration. imbricated cr scale-like ornament belongs to the circle (see fig. ). we now pass naturally from the circle to the spiral element, from which undoubtedly the greatest part of ornamental forms are derived. elementary from nature. in all good ornament it is essential that the principles of "fitness," symmetry," "repetition," "variety," "unity," and "repose" should be considered as parts or qualities that go to the making up of the integral composition. these may be termed the primary principles. there are others that might be classed as secondary ones, that are not essential, nor yet found in all cases of illustrated ornament, but are very necessary and important in their places, such as the principles of "radiation," "stability," "series," "balance," "subordination," "alternation," "growth," "geometrical arrangement," and " order." "fitness" may be described as that quality which embraces all the necessary requirements, in material, texture, and arrangement of masses, in a well-ordered design, so that after the units of the composition are set out and balanced with due regard to the plan, any further addition to or taking away from would mar its principles of ornament. beauty or perfect fitness. this quality is the naked truth of ornament. adaptability is merely another term for fitness, and unsuitableness is its opposite. orna- ment can scarcely be said to have a separate existence from the principle of symmetry. the most unshapen form or ragged blot if exactly reproduced on the opposite side of a straight line will make ornament, and at the same time illustrate symmetry. neither is there any quality so universal in natural forms ; take, for example, the very unsymmetrical single shell of the oyster—you have only to open it out to illustrate symmetry in form. the same principle is observed in the human figure, for where an unsymmetrical limb or ear, &c, exists, it is balanced by having its duplicate. even in trees, plants, and flowers, the same laws exist, for if a leaf or flower be unsymmetrical in itself, as a rule you will find it repeated on the other side of its stem. trees are more symmetrical than at first sight appear, so are clouds. nature has the delightful habit of exhibiting waywardness and irregularity, but it is often apparently so, rather than in reality. the laws of equilibrium alone will cause a symmetrical growth in trees ; it is only in detail that any difference is seen, and this apparent want of regularity is made up again in the proper balance of the masses in foliage and of the quantity in the branches and stems. the same remarks will apply to cloud forms. in arranging the materials for a picture or in a group for painting, the symmetry of mass, colour, light and shade must be attended to, an undue amount of any of these qualities to the weakening of the others in the work produces a corresponding weakness in the whole com- position. "repetition" in ornament is one of its vital principles, and what we have to consider chiefly is how this law is to be dispensed the simple unmeaning and aesthetic forms, such as frets, bands, bead ornaments, all moulding c elementary decorations, and simple diapers, may be repeated to the greatest extent without appearing monotonous. symbolic, and distinguishing forms of any style, on the other hand, may only be repeated to a very limited extent, even if they only are simple leaf forms. when we come to independent ornament, such as emblems, trophies, &c, still less repetition is allowed. ascending higher in the scale of ornamental elements we come to the delineation of animals, and the human figure. these forms, especially the latter, can hardly be used twice in the same design, or scheme of decoration, except at great intervals. an exception to this rule would be in the case of cupids or amorini, and these must not be rendered so much in imitation of nature or realistic in effect, but a strictly decorative quality must be imparted to them, such as in the arranging of their flowing lines to compose with the ornamental spaces they are intended to occupy. in short, the more like a transcript from nature the decorative unit appears, the less will it bear repetition. we notice, in all barbaric ornament, repetition carried to excess. "variety" is of a higher order than repetition, inasmuch as it requires more skill to deal with it properly in ornament. it is the salt of ornament that cures the in- sipidity of repetition, and is a great power in the hands of a skilful designer. "contrast" is akin to "variety," but ot a more emphatic kind. in examples of the best ornament it takes an important part. in linear ornament the circle and straight line give the greatest contrast, and in colour it is the chief source of virility. it is the factor used to produce force, power, and brilliancy ; without it your work will appear sleepy, monotonous, and dry. it is, however, no enemy to "repose" in art; rather, when contrast and repose are united, the result is breadth and grandeur. in the ornament of the renaissance, contrast is best illustrated, owing to the great variety of forms and elements used. we have the delicate varieties of the principles of ornament. « acanthus foliage contrasting with vase forms, labels, shields, armour, fish, and other animals, and also the human figure. almost anything of an ornamental character and well-defined form has been used in harmony and with complete success by the artists of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, in pilasters, panels, friezes, and spandrils. "radiation" is a principle illustrated to a great extent in nature, and is of several kinds, such as radiation from a point, from a vertical line, and from a horizonal line. the law of tangential growth as seen in most plants, where the minor stems and the leaves spring from the parent stem, is a species of radiation, and is important in the construction of scrolls and similar ornament. in plants of horizontal growth and in umbelliferous plants, the spiral lines in shells, the primary feathers of a bird's wing, the fingers in the human hand, are amongst the subjects that illustrate radiation from a point. the secondary feathers in the wing of a bird radiate from the horizontal line of the humerus bone. the so-called honeysuckle ornament, or anthemions of the greeks, afford good illustrations of radiation, and they are always finer in style when they radiate more from a horizontal line than from a single point; the leading lines, pipes, and ribs of acanthus foliage, as seen in capitals of columns and pilasters, radiate mostly in this way. festoons and swags have their radiation on the principle of drapery hanging from point to point. "balance" in ornament is a quality so necessary that all bad and debased work may be distinguished by the want of it balance differs from symmetry in this respect, that you may have true balance in form, line, and colour of a design without symmetry, as in work where the detail is quite different; but otherwise, if it is to preserve its dignity as good ornament, it must have its general masses arranged on a symmetrical basis. want of balance is noticed in the rococo style of ornament, in c elementary the more naturalistic part of pompeian, in japanese work with all its beauty, and in nearly half the ornamental productions of the present day. "repose" is the opposite to unrest or spottiness. it is well illustrated, and is a characteristic of classical architecture, in opposition to the unrest of the pinnacled and spiky forms of the gothic styles. while the former is in consonance with a southern climate, where broad shadows and shelter from the sun are desirable, the latter is suited to colder and moist climates, where its sloping roofs and pointed character afford the least suface to rain and snow, and thus in a great measure protect and preserve the building. horizontality, or a horizontal line, may therefore be taken as the essential principle of repose, and its opposite may be illustrated by a vertical line. from this may be deduced that all horizontal growth of ornament possesses the quality of repose in a greater measure or degree than ornament otherwise constructed. care should be taken not to confound repose with heaviness. in designing the positions of border lines or mouldings to a panel or pilaster, we should regulate the widths or distances apart of the lines as to prevent the monotony seen for example in the lines of a ruled copy-book or an assemblage of telegraph-wires; no two interspaces or lines if possible should be of the same width. in the window openings of factories, and in the endless rows of iron railing to gardens and parks, we notice this same kind of monotony, which is very depressing to the eye ; little or no more expense would put a larger window here and there, or a more ornate one, and a larger rail post, or two or more joined together in an ornamental way, at regulated intervals, would tend to relieve the monotony, and add a pleasure to the life of the beholder as well. this want of what is called "alternation" in design or decoration is of the same character, and analogous to a surface or object that is decorated so elaborately principles of ornament. with a diaper pattern or otherwise, without a break or plain surface left, that it is really wearisome to look at. the value of plain spaces is enormous in design. charles lamb, in one of his delightful letters to coleridge, says in finishing: "i will leave you, in mercy, one small white spot empty below, to repose your eyes upon, fatigued as they must be with the wilderness of words they have by this time painfully travelled through." to the designer this analogy will be obvious and useful. plain spaces as alternations in design, are the oases in the wilderness of ornament, and they may also be compared to a refreshing silence, after a great noise. it is easier to fall into the sin of making too much of a good thing, than it is to weigh your quantities or to know exactly where to stop. any excess of ornamenta- tion must be guarded against, for it generally leads to still greater excesses. elevating the material at the expense of the spiritual element leads in the end to decay in any style of art. elementary principles of ornament. we may next consider briefly the ornamental treatment of walls, ceilings, and floors. beginning with the floor, it is distinctly necessary to remember that in floor decoration the sense of flatness should always be maintained, whether it be in carpets, so (xk—suuc- roi ram s - iiii i i i - rugs, floor-cloths, mosaic, tiles, or parquetry. nothing should be introduced to disturb the flatness, such as in shading the forms, or in imitation of mouldings. all realistic renderings of an animal or floral nature should be carefully avoided. the colour may be as varied as ' principles of ornament. a study of these divisions will help the designer in setting out and spacing ornament generally on any surface. in the case where a ceiling to be decorated is already divided by beams or joists, the panelling, if admissible, should be repeated in the different compartments. ceil- ings of corridors or long rooms may be divided across at discretion, but still the arrangement of panels should contain some elongated ones, that would be dominant, :; »- h and of nearly the proportion as the outlines of the whole ceiling. regarding relief work or modelled ornament on ceil- ings, this should be so regulated in amount of relief that the light from windows or artificial light should cause little or no cast shadows ; the forms should be carefully rounded off in the more important masses to lessen the abruptness of cast shadow. an equal division of the larger masses of light and dark, connected and softened by lesser tones elementary principles of ornament. would be also harmonic in form. the uniformity of shape in a circle and a square, though essential in many cases in architecture, is, however, inartistic in ornament, especially in painted decoration ; either the contours of these forms must be broken (as in the round heads of flowers, in the square nail-headed gothic ornament) when used in painted and low-relieved decoration, or the aid of perspective must be enlisted to render them artistic, by converting them apparently to oblong and elliptical shapes. it is an old acknowledged truism that the supe- riority of the greek mouldings over the roman lies in the fact that the former are designed from the sections of the ellipse, and the latter from those of the circle. many causes have been assigned to account for the ellipse being a superior ornamental form to the circle: the prime reason would appear to be that while the circle possesses unity it lacks contrast; the ellipse having both requisi- tions qualifies it at once as an artistic and pleasing form, far above the circle, which is dowered only with unity; of course this applies equally to the sections of each figure from which the mouldings are designed. the form of the human figure, or of an animal, de- lineated in elevation or drawn as a silhouette, is decidedly inartistic, though naturally and essentially uniform; it gains, however, considerably in an artistic point of view, when drawn or seen in perspective; this is simply because it loses a little of its unpleasant uniformity, and gains a corresponding amount of contrast—the contrast of fore- shortening and diminishing of similar parts with others seen, let us say, more parallel to the picture plane. it will be seen that uniformity by itself cannot be con- sidered a good quality in ornament; it is only a part of the whole that requires the addition of contrast or variety. uniformity produces monotony, which is always painful to the eye in design. the remarks previously made on ceiling-divisions will apply generally to the dividing of any plane in harmonic spaces: the same rule—namely, that the general outline v elementary by its character, will govern and define the method of spacing subdivisions, inasmuch as one division must be larger or more prominent than any of the others, and also it must be the first or principal echo of the general outline, while the smaller subdivisions will be echoes necessarily fainter, but characteristic of the minor quali- ties, such as in c< ntour and area. this can be illustrated in the divisions and spaces of a decorated vase; in this instance we deal only with the surface as a field for decoration. the lines of subdivision are drawn across the object at those points of height where the transition of curve is most apparent in the outline, and a proper expression of binding strength is thereby im- parted (fig. ). we have in fig. three examples of drinking-glasses; it will be seen that a is not artistic in proportions, by reason of the stem being of the same height as the bowl, whilst b and c, not having the same uniformity of height- principles of ornament. measurement, are more pleasing shapes ; this applies also to the panels of doors at fig. . any marked uniformity in the principal measurements of the divisions in planes l iy \ or solids never looks well, and ought to be avoided. it would appear an exception to this, in the uniform mea- surements of such objects as balusters and spindle- shaped figures, but it really comes under the rule that the d principles of ornament. given as a good example of the selection and arrange- ment of the simple decorative elements. it is a capital example of savage ingenuity, being a shield made of woven cane, decorated with appliqub work of cut shells, sewed on the ground-work of black and yellow cane, and is the work of south sea islanders. first, there is the simple but fitting shape in the outline, then the horizontal bands that with a show of strength emphasize the points where the outline is weakest; the constructive ground-work has a good contrast of circular oblique, upright, and horizontal lines; and lastly, the decorative work of cut shells further beautifies the object, and the selection of those forms that are in unison with the ground-work pattern is judicious and correct. the weakest part of the decoration is where too many of the circular units are applied, at the top and bottom; the undue repetition of these forms gives an undesirable elementary principles of ornament. sixth, compositions specially designed to fill spaces, not included in the above. taking the first, the student will not find it a difficult matter to understand what a "diaper" is; it may safely be said that three-fourths of conventional ornament con- sists of diapers; nearly all woven fabrics patterns, the majority of paper-hanging designs, patterns produced by weaving or painting, either from blocks or rollers, tile patterns—in fact, any pattern that repeats from the four cardinal points over a surface is in reality a diaper, how- ever complex it may be in itself. it differs only by its complexity from a simpler spot or unit that is repeated oftener, notwithstanding its greater size or less frequent repeat. the derivation of the word comes from " linge d'yprh," being the name given to the linen of that peculiar pattern, composed of squares, and such like simple ornament placed close together, and was first made at ypres, in flanders. some of the best examples of pure diaper patterns are to be found sculptured on the walls and spandrils of westminster abbey, lincoln and canterbury cathedrals. these were imitated from original diapers painted and woven on linen and other fabrics. diapered work is very frequent in arabian and moorish ornament (see figs. , , , and ). "diapering" is distinguished from "spotting" and principles of ornament. horizontal band in their decorations, both painted and sculptured. the embroidered patterns on their dresses and curtains, and the beautiful ornament on their vases, were mainly designed on the horizontal band or frieze system. the frieze is a very characteristic feature in greek ornament and architecture; if you take frieze or band ornament out of greek work there is very little ornament of any kind left. figs. , , and are favourite frieze and flat band patterns of greek origin. a few dress ornaments from the vase paintings are shown at figs. and . spotting at regular intervals was the favourite way of decorating the larger surface of dress material. the circular flower that usually formed the spot in greek ornament was composed of a greater number of petals than the later roman and gothic, which shows its assyrian origin (see fig. ). persian work affords also good examples of horizontal band treatment (see figs. and ). third division: perpendicular bands are not so com- mon in decoration as the former class of ornament; they principles of ornament. be soffits of arches in classic styles, and the decoration of side and under surfaces of groins and ribs in gothic roofs. the decoration on these parts, when constructed to cover the surface uniformly, is best when it starts from elementary development to pure ornament can be studied in the many rosette patterns of the various styles. these, though circular in plan, which at first sight would appear to be derived from flower heads and cups, are in reality a cluster of leaves arranged and radiating like the spokes of a wheel, or in a spiral form, from a central point. there are many plants, as, for instance, the bedstraw and the madder plant, that have their sets of leaves arranged in a whorl around the joints of their upright stems : looking down on these leaves we notice the plan appears like a rosette. this idea must have occurred to the ancients when designing their rosettes and paterae. the results obtained by grouping a cluster of leaves together in this manner are finer and stronger in appear- ance, particularly for sculptured work, than any mere imitation of flower heads (see fig. ). leaflets and elementary principles of ornament. higher beauties and general nature alone ought to be expressed, and what may seem a paradox, the less naturalistic we make our designs, the more nature we will put into them—that is to say, we should strive to put the best intentions of nature into our ornament, avoiding poor and stunted forms, as well as over-nourished and rank ones (for we find nature abounds in both); but to seek for the finest and the most typical forms of leaves, flowers, and stems, and try to make our designs express the higher ideal that nature herself is striving after. the truest ideal, after all, is only the most natural. in persian ornament we find flower and plant forms treated in a thoroughly decorative manner (figs. and ); the pink and hyacinth were favourites with persian decorators, as the maple and vine in mediaeval and gothic work, the lotus and papyrus in egyptian, the peony in chinese, and the chrysanthemum in japanese ; while such styles as the arabian, greek, roman, and celtic, are more purely conventional, and, without having much apparent naturalism, are still the outcome and are based on natural forms. chapter vii. students in design cannot be too strongly advised to cultivate the habit of making small but correct drawings of all kinds of plants, both in flower and in fruit, especially plants of single flower and of simple growth, accompanied by careful notes of the construction at the stem and leaf junctions. there is no need to make a botanical analysis of a elementary principles of ornament. plant for the purposes of design; sections of petals, stamens, leaves, and fruit, may serve a scientific end, but make a very poor show in what is intended for an artistic design. landor the poet thought it was an act of cruelty to cut a flower from its stem: it would be inter- esting to know his opinion of that school of decorators who believe-in dissecting plants to find "new forms," so that many of their designs present novelties that nature never dreamt of, such as broken stems, leaves neatly cut /oo in half, flat elevations, and sections of petals, stamens, pistils, and seed pods, and other curious forms, suggested by these dissections, so that the design when completed is at best an ironed-out barbarism, and certainly innocent of any violation of the second commandment. in this respect the designers of this school will tell you that their work is unlike the arabian or moresque decoration (the artists of which were forbidden by their religion to make a representation of anything in "the heavens above or elementary the earth beneath"), inasmuch as theirs all comes from nature,—but, with the barbarous aid of the knife and scissors. the whole testimony of the best old decorative design is decidedly against the above practice, and it is refreshing to see at the present time a reaction setting in, mainly owing to the efforts in england of such men as morris, crane, burne-jones, and a few others who prefer nature to novelty ; and, as a consequence, we see already the beauty and truth of the old work returning afresh, like the flowers again in the spring of the year. in selecting plants for particular purposes and positions in design, it would be as well to bear in mind the material we wish to decorate, whether it be textile, wood, or metal, so as to choose that kind best adapted by their fragility, as the harebell, wild poppy, grasses, and ferns, to muslins, cottons, and lace; the mallow, oak, orange, ° elementary generated by the free play of the brush (see fig. ). the arabesques of the vatican, and the italian glazed earthen- ware of the cinque cento period, afford the best examples of this painted foliage. the acanthus was the parent of nearly all the subsequent styles of decorative foliage down to our early english gothic, and the history of its modifi- cations has clearly established the difficulty of trying to improve on the original classic type. we are advised in a general way by artists and writers on art to seek for a new variety of leaf that might in time rival the acanthus in ornament. the advice is praiseworthy, and many have given their thoughts to it, but no lasting results have as yet foreshadowed themselves. of late years there appears to be a kind of scroll-work very much in favour with some artists. it of course cannot be called new, any- more than anything else in the world; but its persistent application, from illumination to stone-carving, will per- haps in time stamp it with an independent character. at present it is more like a sea-weed than anything else, but also partakes of the acanthus, ox-eye daisy, or wild poppy leafage. perhaps it is just as well that we should have no fixed school of ornamental art, as variety of thought elementary sacred to bacchus, and are classed as symbolic ones in greek and roman decoration. early christian and mediaeval art is teeming with symbolic ornament which goes under the names of "allegory," "emblems," "attributes," "symbols," "images," &c. allegory may be said to possess a higher meaning than any fig /i of the other terms; in art it differs from them in this respect, that, while possessing a veiled or hidden mean- ing in common with them, it also must have, to be worthy of its name, an expression of ideal beauty in composition and form. this abstract quality distinguishes it from an emblem or a symbol, nor is it necessary that it should glossary. ' absolute sameness in the two sides of a piece of ornament. see figs. , , and . tangential growth, the principal construction lines in foliated ornament and scroll patterns should illustrate "tangential growth "; the stems and curves should appear to flow out of the central line. this natural principle is derived from the growth of stems and branches of freely growing plants, and under this law the secondary lines of construclion in a flowing pattern should appear to touch or glide into the primary ones, and not to cross or interlace. uniformity, see page . unit, the smallest or simplest complete expression of ornament in any scheme of decoration. unity, perfect agreement in all the parts of a design; harmony and order. these qualities are best arrived at by the judicious use of the principle of contrast; unity is often a characteristic of designs that are very monotonous, so by itself it will scarcely render a design pleasing as a whole; variety must be added to unity in order to effect this. unsymmetrical, without symmetry, such as the volute or single scroll form. see the word "balance." variety, a mixture of various shaped forms; alternation in different measures of various elements in ornament. kichard clay and sons, limited, london and bungay. i ) essay on or n a mental art as applicable to trade and manufactures. by james ballantine, author of “a treatise on painted glass," etc. etc. london: w. s. orr, & co., paternoster row.' edinburgh: john menzies. m.dccc. xlvii preface. doing so, these and similar errors and incongruities; and to supply to the public in general, but especially to those trades in which a knowledge of ornamental design is required, a correct, simple, and copious guide in that beautiful art. the cabinet- maker, ironfounder, painter, brassfounder, silversmith, paper-stainer, engraver, wood-carver, frame-maker, damask-weaver, bookbinder, and many others, will find in this volume materials suggestive of an infinite variety of chaste and classical designs, arranged on principles so clear and comprehensive as to present examples capable of being appreciated and used by every workman; and it may be noticed, as a peculiar and most important feature in the plan of the work, that in the arrangement of the designs for each particular trade, care has been taken to render the whole series susceptible of being modified, re-arranged, and adapted to the use of tradesmen in general ; so that the patterns intended more immediately for the ironfounder, bookbinder, painter, or cabinet-maker, may with the greatest facility be transposed (if we may use the term) for the various purposes of any of the other trades mentioned above. in conclusion, one point above all others will be kept steadily in view throughout the course of the publication—viz., the general utility of every design intro- duced. it is intended, from time to time, to present copies of rare and valuable etchings by some of the great masters, as in the beautiful group in part i. by guido, after lucas cambiaso; an arrangement which, it is believed, will be of great ad- vantage to several of the ornamental trades, especially to the silversmith, house- decorator, modeller in stucco, and wood-carver, and may not be unserviceable even in the higher walks of art. these instances, however, will not be of frequent oc- currence, the main purpose of the work being of wider application than to admit of more than a very limited proportion of such designs; but their occasional introduc- tion cannot fail greatly to enhance its value to the trades just mentioned, as well as to purchasers generally. with these brief remarks the work is presented to the public, whose patronage no exertion will be spared to deserve and to obtain. essay on ornamental art. please at first sight; if they do not, no process of reasoning will afterwards reconcile us to them, far less invest them with the beauty sought for or expected. to speak of works of art growing upon our liking is absurd. persons may, and often do, improve on acquaintance, but works of art never. the perception of beauty is inhe- rent in the human mind, which is rapid in its combinations, and prompt and irrevocable in its decisions. man, in his primitive state, feels a strong desire to imitate and perpetuate that which is beautiful; and hence it is that we find him attaining considerable skill in ornamental arts, before he has acquired any knowledge of those which contribute more immediately to his social comforts. the south sea islander, with no better instru- ment than a piece of shell or talc, produces specimens of carving closely approach- ing the most successful efforts of our best artists; and in several authenticated fragments of ancient british art, ornamental details are exhibited nearly equalling the best specimens of greece or rome. the savage who roams through the pathless forest, decks himself with the beautiful productions of nature, thus showing that an appreciation of beauty is an innate principle of the human mind. the first adaptation of natural objects to decorative art, is in the adornment of the person; when this propensity is extended to the dwelling-place, it evinces a more advanced stage of refinement and of social improvement. this development of what is un- doubtedly an innate principle of the human mind, enables us to affirm, that the basis of every style of ornamental decoration is to be found in the general aspect, and natural productions, of the country wherein each style had its origin. every style of ornamental art has its peculiar features, and perhaps it may also be said its peculiar beauties, although artists often betray a tendency to think lightly of every style but that which has struck their fancy, and has become the object of their admiration and the subject of their studies. the diligent student, however, who comes unprejudiced to the inquiry, will soon discover that every style has some- thing to recommend it, something which renders it peculiarly adapted to the age and country in which it has been most generally practised : he will, probably, also discover that beautiful combinations are to be found in each and all of the various styles, and that though the elements of beauty are few and simple, they are capable of the most diversified arrangements and combinations, and present, in their practical application to the purposes of art, a boundless field for invention. this proposition we shall hereafter have occasion more fully to illustrate, when examining the peculiarities of s essay on ornamental art. senting religious subjects, while those of the palaces were delineations of battles, hunting scenes, and occasionally the occupations of daily life. the difficult art of sculpturing granite was also well known; and the hieroglyphics on granite obelisks and other monuments are sculptured with a minuteness and delicacy of finish which modern artists have not yet attained. the egyptians were also skilled in the compounding of metals, many of their bronzes retaining smooth and bright surfaces, though buried for ages, and afterwards exposed to the damp of european climates. the egyptians were a domestic people, and extremely attentive to the decoration of their houses. their articles of furniture were at once rich in colour and graceful in form; and the commonest utensils were characterised by singular elegance. their chairs and couches were about the same height with those now in use; and were nearly the same in form and construction. at an early period the skill of their cabinetmakers had obviated the necessity of uniting the legs with bars; and they were generally formed in imitation of those of some animal, the foot raised on a small block or pin. the back of the chair was occasionally concave; and in many of the large fauteuils a lion formed an arm on either side. the cushions of the fauteuils and couches were of coloured cotton, painted leather, or gold and silver tissue, and the framework was frequently bound with ornamental metal plates, or inlaid with ivory and foreign woods. the cuts here introduced will give an idea of the forms of the chair, the camp stool, and the couch, which bear considerable resemblance to those of the present day. the walls and ceilings of the egyptian apartments were richly painted, and generally with exquisite taste. the ceilings were laid out in compartments, each having a geometric or foliated pattern with an appropriate border. the favourite essay on ornamental art. forms were the square, the diamond, the circle, and the succession of scrolls, and square within square, known as the tuscan border, and so often found on greek and etruscan vases, as well as on similar ornamental designs that were afterwards adopted by the romans. the following forms are of an age years prior to the christian era. the walls of the palaces were inlaid with precious metals, ebony, and ivory. lucan thus describes the banqueting hall of cleopatra :- “ thick golden plates the latent beams infold, and the high roof was fretted o'er with gold. of solid marble all the walls were made, and onyx even the meaner floor inlaid ; while porphyry and agate round the court, in massy columns rose a proud support. of solid ebony each post was wrought, from swarthy meroë profusely brought. with ivory was the entrance crusted o'er, and polished tortoise hid each shining door ; while on the cloudy spots enchased was seen the lively emerald's never failing green." in concluding this brief analysis of the ornamental arts in egypt, we cannot but advert to the remarkable analogy between the construction of the hieroglyphic names and standards of the ancient egyptian monarchs, and the quartering of arms in modern heraldry. in the hieroglyphic inscriptions every king bears two names, each enclosed, within an oval. in these ovals are blazoned the bearings derived from the prenomen and second name of the father, or from the wife and her father, similar to the manner in which the blazon of the husband and wife are impaled in с essay on ornamental art. modern shields; and from these symbols of descent or alliance we can trace the origin and extraction of the pharoahs of ancient egypt. nor is this the only analogy, the resemblance obtains through the whole system; and an ancient oval, crested with its ostrich, and flanked with the royal basilisk, was almost identical with a modern escutcheon with its supporters. it seems probable, therefore, that our heraldic system is an offshoot of the ancient blazonry of names and banners adapted to european customs and requirements, and that the rudiments of this, as well as those of every other department of ornamental art, were known four thousand years ago. on the ornamental arts of ancient greece. the extent to which the greeks improved on the designs of the egyptians is very remarkable, and eminently calculated to impress us with the highest opinion of their genius and taste. in egypt we find the rudiments of all the arts that tend to advance social refinement; in greece we find those rudiments formed into systems of beauty and symmetry. all the ornamental designs of the greeks, whether in articles of dress or furniture, whether in their private dwellings or their public structures, were characterized by great simplicity and elegance. having studied thoroughly the principles developed in the works of the egyptians, the greeks caught the spirit in which they were conceived, and quickly surpassed their teachers. what the lotus and palm had been to the former, the acanthus and honeysuckle became to the latter; and forms based on these indigenous plants were used in ornamenting every article of dress, as well as in the decoration of every public edifice. the source of design being fully explored, the art soon became sufficiently under- stood. an infinite variety of graceful outline and exquisite proportion was exhibited in the public temples and sculptures by which they were adorned; and the craftsmen of greece, thus familiarized to the sight of beauty, became capable of discriminating, as if instinctively, between what was incongruous and what possessed the charm of unity. the contemplation of the ornamental sculptures on these matchless structures would suggest to the mechanic the propriety of generalizing his ideas of nature, and would enable him to select and arrange her productions to suit the essay on ornamental art. requirements of his particular branch of art. in this way alone can we account for the universal presence of that beauty which distinguishes all their works. the grecians seem not to have attached so much value to costly material as to fine design ; and even when rich dresses and gorgeous furnishings were used, they were chiefly valued on account of their elegance and delicacy of execution. their lamps, for example, were not of gold or silver, but of brass, wrought by the best sculptor that the purchaser could afford to employ; and the metal was left to its natural tarnish to show the work to advantage. it is to be regretted that we have not been able to obtain a more complete knowledge of the internal arrangements and adornments of the private dwelling- houses of greece. we know, however, that this singular people were universally animated by a desire to extend and perpetuate the national glory, and that all their surplus wealth was voluntarily contributed towards the erection of those beautiful temples, which have never been equalled, and which still remain the admiration of the world. there is every reason, therefore, to believe that their dwelling-houses were furnished in a plain and unostentatious manner; but however homely the material of which their household utensils were made, the shapes into which they were fashioned were singularly elegant and graceful. the antique jug, basket, and chair here shown, will give an idea of the exquisite taste of the greeks in form, carried into the most ordinary utensils, and developed in the most common furniture. i if the ordinary utensils and common articles of furniture were thus beautiful, the vases which were set aside for sacred purposes or extraordinary occasions were emi- essay on ornamental art. nently so; and while they were exceedingly varied in design, they were invariably graceful and elegant in form. artistic talent of the highest order was engaged in their enrichment; and many of the most choice specimens of grecian art are to be found adorning those interesting relics of antiquity. nor is this to be wondered at: the material of which they were formed was likely to endure for ever; and the high purposes to which they were destined were calculated to call forth all the energy and enthusiasm of the artists employed in their production. the designs on the vasés for temples either illustrated the mythological history or the religious services of the deity in whose worship they were engaged. on those which were awarded as prizes at the olympic games, the designs were generally allegorical, and represented virtuous and heroic deeds. others used for funereal purposes were frequently adorned with devices emblematic of the life and character of the deceased; and from the multiplicity of designs preserved in these monuments we derive the most important information concerning the history, dresses, and customs of the ancient greeks. recent discoveries have shown that the finest structures of greece were gorgeously decorated with positive colours; and in a country where the fine arts were so highly appreciated, and where all the national edifices were constructed on principles of the most perfect symmetry, there can be no doubt that the same exquisite perception of beauty in the harmony of colour would be apparent in their chromatic arrangements. we know also that groups of figures skilfully executed and gracefully arranged, embodying lofty conceptions and elevated sentiments, adorned the chief places in their temples; while ornaments, consisting of beautiful flowers, and leaves of elegant form, were introduced with the most exquisite skill, and in a manner that made them appear as if fresh and glistening from the hand of nature. in the ornaments in the finest of the greek temples, such as the erechtheum, we find, in every portion of the detail, a strong resemblance to the sources from which they had been derived. ornamental astragals, for example, are direct imitations of the strung pearls used in female decoration; the holly leaf enriches the mouldings of the doorways; the plait ornament at top and bottom of the shafts of columns is a precise imitation of a plait of silk ribbon; and the close resemblance which those foliated ornaments with which apices, friezes, and capitals are enriched, bear to the acanthus and the honeysuckle, shows distinctly the origin of these beautiful decorations. the following remarks on grecian ornament, by essay on ornamental art. mr kinnard, in the supplement to stuart’s ‘athens,' are in unison with this opinion :- the elemental form of such decorations is to be traced in the earliest contemporary specimens of etruscan and Æginetan art. the pelasgi, who founded the hellenic and etruscan nations, carried with them into the countries they colo- nized, manners, arts, and religion. the similitude of the forms of the ornamental sculpture of the distinct and distant nations they founded, renders it evident that they originally referred to one common prototype as connected with oriental idolatry; and the sacred plant of the east, called tamara, and by the ancient greeks cyamus, was probably the venerated object. that prototype, however, was abandoned and forgotten anterior to the age of the earliest relics of grecian art, wherein we find imaginary curves of capricious formation; but when the arts had reached a higher state of refinement, we find their ornaments approximate to the principle of general vegetation, skilfully accommodated to the rectilinear formality of architecture—until, in the hands of the sculptors of the periclean era, amid a people entertaining a remarkable passion for flowers, the anthemion arrived at that character of elegance which established it as a model to posterior ages.' the following copies are given as illustrative of these inferences :—no. , the most ancient, is of a hard and stiff style, and there is no imitation of any plant; but there would be little difficulty in tracing the change to richer embellishment, more imitative of vegetable nature, until perfection was attained in no. , the anthemion no. . no. . d of the erechtheum. in other cases, the ornament is executed with many varieties of detail, and teeming with new and tasteful combinations. the progress of ornamental d essay on ornamental art. the domestic economy of the ancient romans, and has enabled us to ascertain the precise state of the arts as practised by them at that eventful period of their history. from these remains, it appears that the romans had their houses furnished and decorated in the most sumptuous manner. the walls were enriched with coloured marbles and historical paintings, and the arabesque style of decoration seems to have been universally prevalent. this style was introduced in the time of augustus, previous to which it was customary with the romans to paint the walls of their apartments one uniform colour, relieved by modelled ornaments. one peculiarity in the mode of decorating the walls of pompeian houses is worthy of notice, on account of its showing how well the artists understood the true prin- ciples of decoration. in the natural landscape, we find that the dark masses are in the foreground, the middle tints in the middle distance, and the light itself in the sky. in the houses of pompeii, the dark colours are placed lowest, the shades becom- ing lighter as they approach the ceiling; the arrangement of tint thus conforming to the rule observed in nature. in some instances, it is true, this is very crudely carried out; but, even in such cases, the principles found in nature are adhered to, principles which, when employed in internal decoration, under well regulated taste, never fail to produce the most pleasing effects—giving at once airiness and dignity to the apartment to which they have been applied. the influence which etruria exercised over the roman arts, at the period referred to, is visible in many of the decorations; many of the ornamental borders and scrolls on the walls of the houses of pompeii and herculaneum bearing a striking resemblance to those on etruscan vases. in almost all cases, these decora- tions, though singularly bold and free, seem to have been executed without any preliminary tracing or drawing, and the opposite sides of the same forms were, in consequence, seldom if ever precisely similar. in many of the arabesque combina- tions, representations of native plants and flowers are to be seen, showing how highly the romans appreciated, and how readily they introduced into their decorations, the graceful and beautiful in nature. the borders here shewn are from gell's . pompeii,' and are extremely elegant. it will be observed that the leading lines of these borders are eliptical, and that they are grecian in character. it may, therefore, be inferred that they were exe- essay on ornamental art. cuted at a very early period. in the enrichments and embellishments of roman buildings at a subsequent period, we find that the arrangements and curvatures are circular. the romans preferred the rose to the lotus or the honeysuckle, and the preference is distinctly visible in the capitals, friezes, and mouldings of their build- ings, as well as in their ornamental wreaths and devices; while those unique roman vases, so many specimens of which have been discovered in almost every part of the civilized world, are of similar character, both in general design and in minor detail. this peculiarity constitutes the chief difference between the ornamental designs of the greeks and romans. in the former the leading lines are eliptical, in the latter they are circular; and as the elipse is found to be prevalent in every branch of the animal and vegetable kingdoms, it may safely be asserted that the ornamental arts of greece were superior to those of rome. the romans seem to have preferred the circle so soon as they had freed themselves from the trammels of their predecessors, the greeks, and had begun to design for themselves; and this is sufficiently illus- trated by the following ornament from a ceiling of pompeii, wherein the leading curves and general design are altogether circular :- this ornament, which is a very early specimen of the style in which figures and foliage are connected, bears a striking resemblance to the arabesques of raphael, and confirms the belief that that great artist, in his decorative designs for the vati- can, followed the general character of the ornamental designs found in the baths of titus. in no department of ornamental decoration did the romans attain greater proficiency than in their mosaic or tesselated pavements, which must have been produced at a very moderate expense, as a great number of the ordinary houses of pompeii have been laid with this beautiful flooring. these mosaics are chiefly com- essay on ornamental art. posed of black frets or meandering patterns on a white ground, or white ones on a black ground; but in some instances they are executed in coloured marbles, and have a magnificent appearance. many fine pictures, brilliantly executed in mosaic, have also been found in pompeii, and specimens of all the different kinds, many of them surpassingly beautiful, have been dug up in various parts of london during the last century the romans were also acquainted with the art of manufacturing and colouring glass, which they applied to many purposes of household ornament. pliny mentions an artificer who had invented flexible glass, but who was banished, lest the discovery should injure the working jewellers, by superseding the use of gold and silver drink- ing cups. many of the ornamental drinking glasses found in pompeii are of the most elegant form, bearing evidence of a thorough knowledge and extensive practice of the art which produced them. in the working and mixing of metals, the ancient romans possessed great skill, and the art of inlaying one metal with another was much in repute amongst them. silver ornaments were generally inlaid with gold, and bronze lamps and candelabra were on many occasions inlaid with silver ornaments. among the numerous speci- mens of roman art that remain to us, none are more curious than the lamps and candelabra. on these utensils the romans seem to have lavished all their powers of fancy and invention, giving them the most graceful forms, and ornamenting them in the richest manner. the candelabra, indeed, were one of the most elegant articles of furniture in use, and were generally models of taste, in form, proportion, ornament, and execution. in many cases the type was preserved of the object from which the design had been taken, as in the case of the stem or reed, used in early times for raising the light to a convenient height. in such ex- amples, the buds or shoots which adorn the shaft, in imitation of those on the ori- ginal material, afford a firm grasp to the hand, shewing that the romans well knew the art of making ornaments conduce to the utility of that which they served to adorn. the manner in which the dining-room of a roman noble was furnished, has been thus described by mazois :- • the walls, to a certain height, were ornamented with valuable hangings. other portions were divided into compartments adorned with garlands of ivy and vine. paintings, representing high festivals, were surrounded with arabesque borders. e essay on ornamental art. the apartment was lighted by bronze lamps, dependent from chains of the same material, or raised on richly wrought candelabra. tables, made of citron-wood, rested on ivory feet, and were covered by a plate of silver, chased and carved with exquisite skill. couches, which contained thirty persons, were made of bronze, overlaid with ornaments in silver, gold, and tortoise-shell, the cushions covered with stuffs woven and embroidered with silk mixed with threads of gold.' like all martial nations, the romans bestowed much care upon their military costumes and imple- ments of war, enriching them with every sort of appropriate ornaments their fancy could suggest. their cuirasses, helmets, swords, and shields, were inlaid in the richest manner. their war-chariots were models of elegance, and their horses were capa- risoned with the richest trappings. the ornaments on the portion of the cuirass, here shown, com- bine the elements of the foliated and geometric de- signs of the romans, and give an idea of the place the circle held in their ornamental decorations. on the ornamental arts of the ancient indians and americans. to it will not be deemed irrelevant to an inquiry of this kind, to advert briefly certain points of resemblance between the architectural and sculptural remains of ancient egypt, india, and america, as well as to the similarity in the forms of vases and other articles of manufacture found in these distinct and widely separated coun- tries. in the depths and solitudes of what were once believed to be the primeval forests of central america, have recently been discovered huge pyramids, rivalling in extent those of egypt; sculptural altars and idols ornamented in the most beauti- essay on ornamental art. ful and elaborate manner, and colossal heads closely approximating in magnitude and expression those of egypt and india. in peru, vases of ancient manufacture have been found, ornamented with the vitruvian scroll and grecque border; and, although we know not how these arts found their way in remote times from one distant nation to another, we cannot doubt, from the similarity in their leading features, that they had one common origin. the similarity between the idols and altars of india and america is very remark- able. in both countries, the former are profusely adorned with trinkets and jewellery —the neck and bosom generally displaying double and triple rows of necklaces from which, in many instances, are pendant brooches of immense size and beautiful form. the waist is encircled with richly embroidered sashes and belts, having tassels, fringes, and other ornamental appendages. the dress is frequently diapered with quatre-foils, and other geometric figures. from the ears depend rich and massive rings and drops; while the arms and wrists are adorned with bracelets, and the heads with lofty plumes of feathers. in all these points the stone idols of india and america approximate closely. but there are still other and more remarkable instances of resemblance. in the monuments of both countries the effigies are fre- quently seated in the oriental fashion, and in both, also, do we find the principal figures of colossal size, while those of a subordinate character are of small dimen- sions. the personages represented seem, in some cases, to be engaged in the ordinary business of life, but more frequently in the act of worshipping or amusing the idol to whose service they have been devoted. in all cases, whether merry or sad, tragical or comical, the feeling or sentiment desired to be pourtrayed, is faithfully expressed. the humour displayed in the grotesque attitudes of some of the figures is singularly forcible; while the death’s-heads and cross-bones, with which our sepulchres were wont to be so profusely adorned, have their counterparts on the monuments of central america. a knowledge of geometry, and a love for geometrical decoration, seem to have prevailed both in india and america. we find in dupaix’s ‘american monu- ments,' an endless variety of circular designs cut in stone—the divisions being made in the planes of the circles in every conceivable variety, and being divided invariably according to geometric rules. the representation, no. , of a carved stone, from dupaix's work, affords sufficient evidence of the existence of mathematical knowledge among the ancient americans; while the representation, no. , of an ornamental . essay on ornamental art. stone on the gateway at dipaldinna at amrawutty, shows that geometrical decora- tion was understood and practised by the ancient indians. no. . no. . ww v in both of these examples, the circle is divided and subdivided in the most essay on ornamental art. chief portions had been decorated in the most gorgeous manner, all the elaborate detail of the relieved ornament having been picked in with gold and colour. the rich costume represented on the monuments of hindostan and yucatan, shows that those arts which administer to the elegancies and refinements of life had been extensively patronised and practised in both these countries; and perhaps some of the most interesting illustrations in dupaix’s work are those wherein jewel- lers, feather embroiderers, and other tradesmen, are seen engaged in their various avocations, their mode of working having been very similar to that practised by the workmen of the present day. having now given a brief account of the ornamental arts as practised by those nations of remote antiquity, from which the rudiments of many modern arts seem to have been derived, we proceed to offer a few remarks on the various styles of orna- ment which have recently been employed in decorative works; and, in doing so, we naturally begin with that invented by the saracens or moors, after the decline of the arts in rome. the moorish style of decoration was extensively employed at an early period in spain and the adjoining countries; and the principles on which it is based having been universally recognised as correct, the style itself has come into very general use in all countries where the decorative arts are cultivated. this style seems, on the whole, best adapted for decorating the ceilings, walls, floors, and wainscoting of buildings. it presents harmonious combinations of geometrical figures, with happy arrangements of rich and exuberant foliage. it makes no attempt at deception, in so far as inequality of surface is concerned ; the raised or sunk portions of the ornament being on a level, and the decorations depending mainly for their effect on harmonious combination of line, and judicious balancing of colour. the leading lines, however complicated, are always harmonious; and although rectilineal, angular, circular, and irregular figures, as well as every variety of foliage, are frequently introduced into the same composition, the relation which every part bears to another has been so well understood and considered by the designer, that the whole seems to have been the result of one conception, at once instantaneous and perfect. the colouring of the ancient specimens of this style also shows, on the part of the artist, a thorough acquaintance with those principles developed in the works of nature. hence we find, that those portions intended to be brought prominently forward, either to enhance some point, or to give effect to essay on ornamental art. and other emblems in the calendar of the church of rome were all originally intro- duced by the byzantines into the mosaics of their churches—the entire absence of sculptured effigies from the latter constituting the chief difference between the deco- rations of the greek and the latin churches. the ornamental decorations connected with the gothic style of architecture are characterised by every variety of geometrical combination, and enriched by the most perfect imitation of natural leaves and foliage. no style of architecture can boast of more varied excellencies; no style of ornament is characterised by more exuberant fancy, correct taste, and delicacy of execution. every ornament in the pointed structures of the best period was pregnant with meaning, every enrichment full of design; and, from the golden vane that glittered on the summit of the spire, to the tesselated pavement that adorned the floor, every portion of the ornamental detail was in perfect harmony, each and all tending to enhance the general effect, which was at once gorgeous and overpowering. on examining the progress of gothic ornamental design, it is easy to trace its gradual advancement from imitations of existing models to original adaptations, and combinations from nature and from geometry. most of the ornamental mould- ings used in norman structures, were borrowed either from ancient rome or from specimens existing at that period in france and lombardy. those sculptured wreaths of the bay, the vine, and the ivy, found in the early norman churches, have a close resemblance to similar devices used in the decorations of ancient rome; and the grotesque heads on the blocks and corbels of some of the early norman structures had been previously prevalent in france and italy. in the ornamental decorations of the early english, or primary pointed style, we find a new feature introduced—namely, the use of simple geometric figures in con- nexion with natural foliage. four-leaved flowers are displayed on square panels. circular spaces are filled with trefoils and quatrefoils; while the foliage on the capi- tals, and the crockets running along the edges of spires or pinnacles, bear evidence that it has been imitated, although somewhat clumsily, from nature. in the deco- rated and perpendicular styles of gothic, we have an endless variety of geometric combinations, and a profusion of natural foliage, skilfully and delicately carved—the natural form of the plant or leaf imitated being closely followed in every instance, and every peculiarity minutely and carefully delineated. the oak, the ivy, the vine, and the fern, together with the leaf of the dock and parsley, were sculptured with g essay on ornamental art. wonderful fidelity, and introduced with the most felicitous effect; the value of these representations of homely objects being more readily felt and appreciated than delineations of leaves, plants, and flowers of foreign production. nothing in the whole range of ornamental art is finer than the free combinations of soft luxuriant foliage with which the chief points of these gothic structures were adorned. crockets, pinnacles, finials, capitals, bosses and pendants, were all directly copied from nature. the ornaments were also selected with singular taste, and arranged with great judgment. so judiciously, indeed, were they distributed, that a celebrated writer has remarked, that “the ornaments, although profusely used, might have been left out, without impairing the general effect of the building.' in connexion with these skilful adaptations from nature, the structures of the period alluded to were enriched by an endless variety of geometric figures, such as circles, trefoils, quatrefoils, cinque- foils, &c., suggesting ideas of correct construction and symmetrical harmony. in the proportions of these beautiful edifices, in the groinings of the ceilings, in the tracery of the windows, in the symmetry of the shafts and columns, and in the enrichments of mouldings, capitals, string-courses, niches, and canopies, we find the combina- tion of geometrical forms with natural foliage constantly occurring, and with the most admirable effect. such specimens, therefore, yield abundant proof, that when a designer's taste is regulated by the first principles of proportion, he cannot draw too largely from the great storehouse of nature. let him first learn to produce a symmetrical form, and then study how to enrich it with befitting adornment. in the colouring of gothic decorations, the positive colours were invariably used in their fullest intensity, and with the richest and most harmonious effects. some- times they were used sparingly, at others profusely; the structure glowing, from floor to ceiling, with red, blue, and gold. the painted glass in the windows gave the key-note to the general harmony, and its power and brilliancy required that the walls, ceilings, and floors, should either be studded or entirely covered over with the most vivid colours. this necessity doubtless suggested the introduction of those orna- mental tiles, so many specimens of which have been from time to time discovered in ancient gothic churches, and the manufacture of which is now carried on so extensively in england. in the colouring of the ornamental decorations, care was always taken that prominence should be given to the chief points and features of the edifice, the receding and minor portions being painted in subdued tints, or in a essay on ornamental art. less obtrusive manner; and the decorators seem to have worked on similar principles with those formerly adverted to in connexion with the arabesques of the alhambra, and other moorish decorations. all the leading forms used in gothic ornaments had a symbolic reference. the trefoil and equilateral triangle, for example, were emblems of the trinity; and when inclosed within a circle, the trinity and unity of deity was referred to. emblems and monograms were also much in use. the cross was introduced every where, and decorated in every conceivable manner; and monograms and emblems, having reference to the three persons in the godhead, were largely employed. on the fur- niture of the churches, as well as on the robes, mitres, and croziers of the priests, similar devices were repeated ; and the chief aim of all these splendid ecclesias- tical decorations was, to place continually before the eye signs or embodiments of the leading and peculiar features of the christian faith. in the palaces and man- sions of that period, the ornaments are also full of appropriate emblems and symbols. the heraldic blazon of the noble families to whom they belonged always forms a prominent feature; and the entire system of gothic decoration may with propriety be termed an extended and comprehensive system of heraldry. the illuminated missals of the middle ages are characterised by much that is beautiful, in form and colour, in design and execution. nothing can be conceived more delicately elaborated than some of these exquisite productions. always teeming with thought, and pregnant with meaning, there is no source from which a designer can derive more benefit, than from these storehouses of design. the gradual blending of the castle with the mansion, which took place in the reigns of the latter henrys, led to a demand for ornamental decorations in con- nexion with domestic architecture, which had never previously obtained in england, and which at length produced those comfortable and highly-ornamental mansion- houses, known by the term elizabethan. in the reign of elizabeth, the nobility and gentry vied with each other in the erection of splendid and profusely decorated mansions ; and although these decora- tions are not always characterised by harmonic proportion, they display great ferti- lity of invention, and have a picturesque effect, which renders them exceedingly attractive. the complexity of form and enrichment in elizabethan ornament is very re- markable, rendering it extremely difficult to discover on what principles it was essay on ornamental art. based. it combines a greater variety of leading forms than any other school of decoration ; and several of its features seem to have been selected from a variety of foreign styles, and to have been grafted on the home-bred tudor, which imme- diately preceded its introduction. the chief portions of the architecture, however, are peculiarly english; and although most of the mouldings are roman,* the pen- dants, pinnacles, and ceilings are essentially gothic in their leading features, while the ornamental window-tops and brick chimneys were features in the street architec- ture of that period not found any where but in england. at an early stage of elizabethan architecture, heraldic badges were adopted as leading ornaments; and the rose, thistle, fleur-de-lis, and pomegranate, are very freely used, either as central points to window-tops, or as finials to the pedimented fronts of that period. grotesque and scroll shields, containing armorial bearings, were also much in use; and on the scroll turnings of the shield, pinnacles were frequently perched, while at other times they projected in all directions from the various angles of similar ornaments. pinnacles are possessed of great variety of form; the most characteristic are perforated, and bound round the centre with fillets. eliza- bethan scrolls are generally imitations of paper or parchment scrolls, half unrolled l; and, when used for the ground-work of shields, their effect in light and shadow is picturesque and powerful. in elizabethan ornament, lines are to be found at every degree of obliquity. oblong squares and angular diamonds are often placed in rows, relieved, surrounded, or bound together by trefoliated or zig-zag borderings, which are to be met with in every conceivable variety and combination. squares, ellipses, circles, and right- angled figures are inlaid or surrounded with bands and garters, which are either perforated or interlaced, or appear to be fixed on with bolt-heads of various shapes and sizes, sometimes resembling bosses, sometimes square or octagonal nail heads. the ellipse is very frequently used as a centre, surrounded with scroll-work, and studded with numerous bolts, which, when used even in stone-work, suggest the idea of timber framing, morticed and bolted together. jewels and precious stones are also copiously imitated, both in carving and colouring; and in some instances this is carried to such an extent, that the entire detail of the ornament seems an imitation of jewellery. * the egg-and-dart moulding of the elizabethan style is little removed from that of the roman. essay on ornamental art. = со oo un oo ooo oo оо ce oo roy the ornamental decorations of italy have been long and deservedly held in high estimation. they are at once elegant and lively, and harmonize well with those elegancies of life found among a lively and refined people. italian ornament com- bines many of the beauties of the ornamental decorations of ancient greece and rome, and without aiming at classical simplicity or symmetrical proportion, is flowing and luxuriant. it is composed chiefly of leaves, tendrils, and flowers; and nothing can be finer than the foliated scrolls on the friezes,—the pateras or roses on the ceilings,—or the enrichments on the cornices of italian apartments. angles are rarely found in these compositions, their leading features consisting chiefly of ovoid and circular curves. figures are frequently introduced into the foliated scroll ornamented friezes, and are generally represented sportively engaged in some game, playfully twisting and twining the leaves and tendrils, or concealing themselves among the foliage or flowers ; and in all such examples, the design is graceful, and the effect exceedingly pleasing. the pateras or roses—of which several specimens are given in this work—are characterised by great richness and variety,—the leaves, like those in gothic pendants or bosses, are plastic and natural—the flowers rich essay on ornamental art. and varied. ceilings, walls, and doors are panelled in the most elegant and fanciful manner, and these panels are enriched by every variety of arabesque, historical, and characteristic painting. domes, cones, and soffits are embellished in the most gor- geous manner; and every portion of the interiors of italian villas are furnished as well as decorated in a manner evincing a high state of social refinement, and a high degree of artistic excellence. there can be no doubt that the introduction of the italian style of architecture into england by jones, and its cultivation afterwards by wren, tended to refine the taste and elevate the artistic feeling of the country. many of our fine modern mansions and palaces are in this style, and a large proportion of the beautiful balconies, balustrades, window-tops, and door-pieces, which adorn these structures, are admirable, both in conception and execution. like the elizabethan, which immediately preceded its introduction, the italian style admits of almost every variety of design, and is therefore attractive to artists of inventive genius, who prefer following the dictates of fancy to obeying the stern injunctions of rule. we find, accordingly, that it has always been a favourite with painters ; the divine raphael himself not deeming it unworthy of his genius to execute the ornamental decorations on the walls of the vatican. the celebrated work recently published by gruner, gives a vivid idea of the rich and harmonious colouring with which the interiors of italian palaces are adorned, and may be perused with much profit by those whose tame and insipid taste would banish every thing like colour from the walls and ceilings of our apartments. the arabesque or grotesque style of decoration anciently practised in rome, and afterwards imitated by raphael, is generally associated with italian art, and, not- withstanding its incongruities, paintings of high merit, in conception and execution, are often found intermingling with its playful combinations. vitruvius, who appears to have taken a correct view of the matter, thus describes it : - nothing is now represented on walls but monsters, instead of true and natural objects. in place of columns there are slender reeds, and temples are supported on mere nothingness. demi-figures spring from flowers—some with human faces, others with the heads of beasts; all things which never have, or ever can be. such designs are not to be esteemed, inasmuch as they are not consonant to nature and reason.' there is great force and truth in these remarks, and they are as applicable essay on ornamental art. by way to some of the decorations recently executed in our own country, as they were to those in the time of vitruvius italian ornament, whether in marble, stone, plaster, or painting, in bas relief, or in alto relief, always aims at complete deception; and this, together with the harmonious flow of line and balance of colour, by which the interior decorations of italian structures are pervaded, always renders them pleasing. even when mons- trosities are introduced, and the detail made up of the most unnatural combinations, the colouring is so rich, containing every tint from the deepest purple to the brightest gold ; the light and massive portions of the composition are so gracefully linked together, that the effect is always agreeable, and although the Æsthetic taste may be offended, the eye is invariably delighted. of introduction to a brief notice of the french style of ornament, which is an offshoot of the italian, it may here be mentioned that if ever any grotesques were to be admired, they were those of watteau, whose lively designs, and elegant compo- sitions, have obtained the admiration of all nations. no painter, perhaps, ever combined nature and art so gracefully,—rendered extravagance so pleasing,—or laid such a variety of objects under contribution to effect his purposes. rocks and mountains, hills and valleys, streams and waterfalls, trees, plants, leaves and flowers, trophies of peace and war, scenes of rustic merriment and of courtly pageant, diversified by scenes of touching pathos or broad humour, make up his delightful compositions. take it all in all, we know no style better suited for boudoir or arbour decorations than the charming compositions of watteau, and his success in that department shows that no artist, whatever be his standing, ought to consider the decorative art beneath him. it seems an admirable field for the exercise of genius, and genius can at any and at all times invest it with the attributes of high art ;-grace, dignity, and expression. many of the modern french decorators are artists of eminence; and the decorations of palaces, theatres, and public buildings in france, are remarkable for beautiful and appropriate design, as well as for rich and harmonious colouring. and why, it may be asked, should not british artists do so likewise? they have established a school of high art, no unworthy rival to that of france, and why should they not endeavour to equal them in this more useful though perhaps more humble department of art? the leading character and general detail of the french style of ornament may be described very briefly. it is much more irregular than the italian, and full of essay on ornamental art. the ornamental designer, the propriety of looking to nature herself as the great primal source of all beauty. it was also originally intended to have entered into a careful examination of the present state of the ornamental arts, in connection with the manufacture of articles of dress, of furniture, and of vertù, as well as with the decorations of public structures and private dwellings, both externally and internally. as this important inquiry, however, could not be comprised within the limits to which this work is restricted for the present, it has been deemed advisable to reserve it for another occasion, and, in the meantime, to conclude this essay with a few general remarks and practical hints, which may be found useful to those for whom this publication is specially intended. on looking at the productions of nature, we find them exhibiting every variety of colour and design. the grey crag has its green moss or verdant lichens, the mountain its purple heath, the bough of the tree its glossy foliage, and the banks of the stream its wild flowers; showing the constant propensity of nature to beautify and adorn, and suggesting, at the same time, how much ornamental detail en- hances the attractions of the most symmetrical works of art. the decorative arts, then, are evidently founded in nature, and from her storehouse we must draw the materials for their development. in this, however, as well as in the higher departments of art, the artist will be enabled to produce more original, as well as more elegant designs, by being intimately conversant with these works, which have been long and generally admired. the decorator ought, then, in the first place, to make himself familiar with the various styles of embellishment, and afterwards endeavour to obtain a clear idea of the elements of symmetrical propor- tion, as applicable to ornamental composition. this knowledge may be attained in various ways, but is by no means so easily acquired as is generally imagined. some writers recommend the study of geometry for this purpose; others, a close and diligent application to nature, asserting that in flowers and plants may be found all the elements of beauty and harmony. we should say that both are necessary, and that the progress of the artist will be materially facilitated if, while studying nature and geometry, he makes careful observation of the approved models of antiquity. in treating of geometry in connection with symmetrical proportion, writers have differed widely, some giving the preference to one figure and some to another. the ellipse, however, seems now most generally preferred, and its importance in orna- essay on ornamental art. and without such contrasts, the general effect of ornamental designs is tame and insipid. variety, as well as regularity, is requisite in all symmetrical compositions. a knowledge of botany is indispensable to the ornamental designer. he ought not only to be familiar with the form and colour of the different plants and flowers, but he ought also to be acquainted with their nature and qualities, and he will thus be enabled to avoid those incongruous associations of poisonous weeds and healthy flowers which we find often marring otherwise good designs. the trophies of war are no longer in repute as emblematic decorations, their place being now happily supplied by more agreeable objects—by fruits, flowers, plants, and other productions of nature, suggestive of peaceful and pleasing thoughts, and the aim of the decorator ought to be, to foster and encourage this improved and improving taste. winckleman has observed, that the first grand style of the arts consisted of a system of rules borrowed from nature alone. afterwards artists plunged into the ideal, and, having abandoned truth in their forms, worked after the adopted style rather than nature.' to this it may be added, that the main use of studying other styles, and making ourselves acquainted with their peculiarities, is to learn that nature and simplicity are the leading characteristics of the most approved specimens of the works of antiquity. to copy them without knowing and feeling this truth, is to perform a merely mechanical process, from which no useful improvement can result. there can be no good reason, in a country like this, where a love of home is so prevalent, and where the beauties of nature are so abundant, that our dwellings should be adorned with an indiscriminate and slavish adaptation of the ornamental embellish- ments of other times and other countries. hogarth and wilkie drew their inspira- tion from nature; and hence that truthfulness of delineation in which their great excellence consists, and for which they have obtained universal approbation. while, therefore, the decorative artist appreciates the excellence of the ornamental designs of other times and countries, he must eventually go to the fountain-head- to nature. by no other means need he hope to attain the paramount excellence of all art-originality. li u g sud f we ta / g iata alamontierte ug te s. leith the et lith. edin! ornamental perforated rail-italian. c മം. s. leith del! el l.ithil idu " flemish. زنان saha! et lacho ed from a rare etching by guido reni after lucas cambiaso. italian sorunu ama m ge coro bos my boos ya ccs & lert dell et latho edon' andda auuu an .leith del et latho faun' louis quatorze. th sg t an la ast scroll &c - gothic. . | | e lessons gen sleth del plath edin" grotesque - italian. fc or is por o slam dei et latho edin arabesques. ! | ! ho renas garrame s leith del et lada karn window heads &c.- elizabethan. sg sleid ! et luthe ede fire screen. - crotesque ! ਤੋਂ a کر کا ਨੇ le sl del et lache kam paper hangincs.- arabesque. we b ca be l g w mi mf c po f lm ls m . g ls ws lg k e xa m ples for the ready composition of any cypher consisting of , or more letters. suppose the required letters to be abc, though any others will produce the same effect: st take the two last letters bc cypher . !, fold your paper in the middle and draw the one half only of bl in plain double lines with out ornament as represented in no . nd add a to bc already drawn in the same manner as you there fmd it interwoven with the b, cypher nº . and as represented in n° . then reverse the whole as in no and you will have the entire draught at once. fill up spaces with ornament as in n° . by the foregoing rules and examples, cyphers consisting of abcd or any other letters may be composed by first drawing the two last letters cd, to which prefix b as in bb, and then a as in ab, shewn in which reverse as in no and fill up as in 'no . the vacant 이 ​ s leith dell et luth. edm! initial cyphers. } t m t voor i s. leith dell et lacho bam' ceilings. -italian. . letih let lathe edm' book cover.- flemish. cola do تم نہ کی s. lenth dalt et lacho edın' interior decoration - french sa wie nokset g oveo veo veadvezov zovec g s. leuh det! et látho du perforated rail. - crecian s. leith del et luho edin idon wo dv italian - 条 ​ varan rara susareert asthaniameramanand demahitimes । ना दिन तु moda aagingiantatiicaine leith dell trellis work - flemish. 意 ​ al s. leila del e litho hdin! shields.- elizabethan ma + ef s. leith dell et lacho r perforated rail.- cothic. i aportti ? og ) a dodo ve i s. lerh del! lamps &c - roman. noncirculating . ب ) ة ع ٣ ، -صك . ، ه ( ع ٦ ه سي - --ص ي- - يب ي-ي سال -يجا كاكابا/اجلته لملمتها»)»). قلالا٨ لقبلان»)»)» ق كلآ نييإ كل لميل لو لفا ينا لاك ترمز ثبر هر تر ثبركغ ته» ٨همرلخ يللاقلم«نققق ترلاتق»٨لا»)ك يلتق»». ققلا٨ وقمع))» علاقلمعنتققق كة»)» قق٨يقثذ ثقلا٨ لا)لالمس،لملم لالاتآترلملايخقوا» هعلملمقتر)كقسملململم يا»))» قنتممخقههللمتر ترلانقبيلا٨ »قأ ع»لهرترلاققس٧لم لالإتك٢رآقا ٧للر«نا« ١ ٢ثإ حبة»» لم»ا قالا٨ يات-تك لال حئقعتقلم»لمتر»»» المتاح» لمقل٢لم، وانتمتر٨«حت«للحلم ولا » » لما » » ( ه ع )تنلللئر«ئك لفا«آ٠كل لاقرالملابي ٠٧ق نقاقثققألاق لع ٧لمثكتكلقتن علاتر٨» »ثك تريز» ٧قا . لم لم لم ) ٦ ٨ قل تايا»)»»» و««)ق ع ٣لاوهلم، لمدة همع»سيهل«» ٠ ع قيثهأ» عفو» ٠ نك»أ»حبه ٠ يه٣أسء٨ طقعقلم «اثم» ٠ ح٦حطته ايوهيه٣يهقإ لمسها ع ا نابه ع لمهمس»ثه«؛يإ ٠ لح ماأحالحن٨ ٦ ٠ ٠ «وه» ٠ ع لهبهلا يه«ح«ق ٠ يهلداط« عوه«عهعوك ٠ لح ا ٠ ٣لهاوهلموهبه ارجا ع«حيثهلهق» ا اييهلاوه» وحاح»حها وهيا» وه») ققلآ ععقاوهلمتم لها مك ا وثهث«علماا يهود» يهلما« لمقلم عطلا»» ح تموه علمأح«ع» ٠ ا ٠ ٠ ٠ اليه) ص علم،ييحيهقا يتنأه٣حلم» هق ثملا» و٣ثهسبه ق لمسوه» رحعا«ع»اتر حيك وه»» وس»وث ا ٠ ٠ ص ققثهحبه وق-لا ٠هيإ ملا» وهنا ح تموه ٢يهساق ناح»»» يه»« ماق ناسه-هبه ع . ٠ ٠ ا يقيهعبه ثهأح٧تحيه» وثه»»عأ» ناح وهبهحلم» ٠ يهأح٧تنحيه» وح-» حهة يعقد» . . ا وهلمحسهعلا رع»وهأ» ،قإ ععحل» سقاحيه» وسيهأ» ناح ثهوعحلم» وحثهسلتم تمر ته»أهعطمحء» ٠ . ٠ ٠ ٠ ثهنمح٧ ويدس» هققلمحح عر» هسوهتن ح مك ن-نام-ربه ٠ ٠ ٠ لح ٠ عأسحيهلا وعأمهمااأطا حل وه» يهدي» وعيا» . مك «قع-واقف ٠ ا ا ٠ لح ثهاحعثا ٠ يهأصثه» راعهح»به يا» جلا» وسلما»» مذثهاا ٠ علم.ااحح» ءاقفلنا»» تاق يه»» ثهاا١ مك ٣يهع٣، نق علا ط لم { » لم لم لم قد لم ح لم ٠ ٠ وهل»» ثهةقح له»ح لمهلمطط لح ٠ «عيها ٠ » ص اليه» . ٠ ثهححت«»حىلا ٠ «عاق/واحبه لمبي«ههيهوه ٠ ق يهعحب«طس» . ع٣أس٣٨ ص ٠ ماأح»به ثهثحبي . » حلىح ٠ ٠ ،عبمقالل ٠ ٠ «ع»أ»طك ٠ ثههحلم» لما يه» بك١لم هلاجلهر» نق») تك علاقات» يقل»») نلآلانقللمفعلا٨ . ع«٨ثةنققق لحل»)»». «اا قاتنإ٨ »ترقلم « ضة هم ، لم تل لم ه لم ت لم ط لم و لم . لم ل ي » ع ي ي يإ ة { نق ) اى سل » » نق تن اه هل و ، لم { ط و له لم لم لم و لم ٠ ابيلهلاحثهناح»به ئاحع» يهق»وهقل ح تموه «تنأاثهطعحءلا ٠ وسلم-ح» ٣لثتي» وهوا» ح هوه ىوه«»ق، ا ٠ همس) و؛ه«يهااطهبه ثهينا« وستتم وهعقةقلمق علمه تا»»» قاله يه»» ووهو- » هو «سهم-ث ٠ » و ثهللأاوا٨ هوه-ه» يهتم نين» ييلمع عقد» ومهما ح مك «سنا-ث ٠ ٠ ا يهل»،ثهها٨ روه-هلا و٠هأ٣يه»سلل ولم وه» يهلي؛لم ومحل» ح مك ناس«ه»اط ص . ق . ثهلملمبيعس وعأ٣عطسلتم قا يه» علا» وحث- مك «لمحأنكطعع٣لا ٠ ا ٠ ٠ يه»أسا»٨ يوهأ٣ههقاه) حل يه» وهلا» وثهقسله » تموه وحسني ٠ ا ٠ . يهلل-هر وهلا» عةسته سلط ح تماه بياه»اأ ٠ ٠ لح لح ٠ علمقكحعأ، ع ههمساعح٣هح وثهعثهكلمال حل يه» بهلا» وسلمها) للحب ٢اهد للقب طعأ»ى ثههح» عانا ته-الق ٢موبيع»ءعبه نا»بهكقق٨ ك قتنأسعء ءيهتم وهاا١ وه»« ثمنه لمس» عناه «ته»حعحع ناع٢ وه٧ح» «حالنا ٠ ع ٠ ع مهبههم»هلاهقا يإ لم لى لم ، لم ة لم « لم ج لم ل لم ل لم » و لم ع ل -- ع الهق نهلجيهاا « لع رة طه ث ع ٧تم»نةاا لا نا آته٧ ق ا امل لا آ و يحتل { ثماا ئعل لا ترسي.. عت.يصسعع ل ع ا هفهااياي حبيميه هاه ولاهم يهم ئئإيهللقأ ،اه»نييق هاههلقةلمق ولنا ياهلا،هتم لاذ »رتى، ا سلله اااه لاهم صم تل مهعهر« صجص محي كي ي نس ي- كج- - ا-عي هلهههه للهم ال لقئقإ للقتل أ حنو ليهع بقع ينلتتة . . نلأ ءآ م ههق فلعله قلقة للللللك ا ا للعإ لقح أ ج بح تي بمعا اع-ع-ك ا . . كل ابيح لتنلهتتح - ثلئكا لك يبهر عئلاتنهننعع اإ تمتهن. عيا مععنصقلل ك . قض-ا . ك تتقك ت جس مه . لهة عل هههههيهلقلنهنثل مخئلهىا عتق هم ، ج ن يذ هل . ، لهلههعهأ عقهصعه عتصسهع له ٠ ن مههلههإوفللهههك هي ءهه هتهه»ه وهبا ءس» لمها هلب لكسظ هاج ا --ص -ص يلج-ي - -ص -ص - كج -ععهل. هملمهسسو لبههل هلا ٠هعلق . للللاللنلا « « جي ثقلا لننقهقققهقئنهللللقهقةا ح ا لللهإ قل للحق لل قللا د . ٢لهلا ث لقققق للهقلهه و لك «الا لإ ق يهقإ لقللالا احقق إ ثرققأ قة هل ٠ ققلللللا . ك لل للعلل للقول ا هلق تطلق المهل فكي ئقللللهة له قلهللللللللههآ للللهللللللللق باههللهلهقللا . لك كبر . ةة ج ئة . ا للقنههه فك لهلا تلقاها للنقل يا لمهئللللللق فقها لاهمالهم-للهلاليين} هم ض اسم . هل س كا س هلع مآ لهققهإ قهق لا ققققههقققلق ن قلقه هللجإ لللقهلللللللللههللللل لها الناقلات-معقولية قنئقضعغجتمك عل ه-ك ا لا . . ، . » للملك ل . سا» عا» طهه ا مملأم . ع . »فىعكهع ، ثهقهههههتههقها عح هق مللقجهأ ه ، كو ا اأ»( ) . ي اد ويتم نجيم ( هنههق ققعتة . ههلله ا و ص للا » إ عإ تنتا ي ثم . . . . صسه يع ئقثإقإ حق-قلق-ة ع نزلة نثئ.هئمرقهقمرثيهقررنقلمها ساس لا هب هتس٦«ين ههه»يرهعلامقه - ض-يجب -حص ا سي- سي-ضي ص-سب ل-س س جاسر محل- يلاقي- سل-ل ك-م ي عب عجي ي .- - قه . حلها ني هم لااجلرم هه ك عر ععع- ---ص-ععققي- سيسي تاج ، سععللقهئسر - - -جي - - - - اع-عا-عيس ي علة سعر - - لاى ط لكلا ق ن لاا حل اتهتقئقلتل لللههللإ اا . يمهها بلا هلق ه يعههههععع مهله . مح لالفق «لمعي « لا مه«ها قذ«لماقلى لللللا تىآ لم فاته ، له به» ه١و يا) سيلهلمهام، و»»ا«ظ » سيمنعها ا ح تك لم له -حر تع للإ فمي ؟ رتي ين « لك ع قلد ساس سآ عى ءسهم جي . لققأ ءسحم ح ا غ لك م ام تمثأ لهم مة دم جال مهم. ع لا ين لكقققق ا س فى . للتو نا لك ص ما تلا عقجمل هاو شر.) . لا يثو لحمة يك لتههتنت٠ه هقنقهر هلههم ٦ صصس . ي . ققه ئعععقثم اع . عه لصقحمط ع دهم ع . ، هقهههلهقللا ك للهقهعلهع لا كل بقهه قد ة ر . الح ه قه . ربه عجعق ق ) هم رسم لم» عي-ع ، قبينطقهحعه حتحعت-ير فك رع يني نحتا يحب قة ق حب لقلق ج هر بر ي } ك ث . وثقلا ء جعئو قلة ثم ق مر لمقللحا للحبة ا-نمر ثهع لا قعنلقئلثل ملحمه ع لنهنمتهققعقتنئ لا لحقها ا ته د ح همه كا تن للا عي لهلا فله لله هنأ « . للالكنهم ا . ) طوايا،ضلا هم ل ه أ ا ا ا اا ة ااه ه له ٥ ص قققققققققهعل الار يسهم ١ مهه . يه ه وسهم ٥ نا وه سا ما ل وة . ع هققها عة يععي . يهعع قسم سهقققعن٠ ؤا صق ك فك اههعجه . ك بها لقققهققئقعهلئ لعلهما باك هلال ارضت-ك عققتلللححقللللععه عل كقتقتقأ -ع-ع٠ لائئئئئئئئئئئئئئااكل ا تصلك اعتقتقهع عي- اا قسم-يصيبك هئنلنليه كصههلح يبح ا با بي ع ه قلقك في ) ا لهللقققكإ ع تإ قاي رك ققتنعلصصسقهق٠ك . . ثغتقنإ ( نا ي يتصل ك س لثبحمعئننيب فملقللبئل جدة لقلقثئرل ج ،٠ وح بي ٢ ابه . ط للقلق لوك هلي لمحها ، ئف ق وجهلها لا ثا علة يقلها ة نجلقحملللإ ج يد لللقلقلا عهقهتك وا ه للمتعة قءعع إم . اد للثلللى مهلا بمالههئقز عم « لنللللللنفأ فه ) ماهر هم لة ع ي اسع سمر حع لتوليها ط لكل اعينه اا-عتلة امر -لس مع بح قئعحتئح ثأثمئلئق بللها لهم يهقلقهه ققهلقئهة تاع-- . تنأ تن تنم م ثسئ « ههحه قا قلقة لنا للغنأ جبهت له ي لهلهلا حرا هقللللا امصجمعح ٠ لهب لن لللللملأماأا ، ا يس- س معع ك عسر ثا ى ينهها لك ك ي-ي- لم ل أ م ا ط ل ١ملهلمه ١ئكئك ل هل وه . ع م ل ا تيللنا،لاالاللاان٠.لهينة يهمهم ، قئمحئه المخ « قههإ ر لا اى ٦ ل ا ا اا لم اهأ نللي فلاماريون-لاهلهم ا بقلق ااث لها للننا - . يي هب رة اة سم ، عسل- نخلق ممهههم هي اااا - ك-س لكي عل- جس- اي- مح-ص- ع-يسع- - يت. لعبت ع لك-عسانا..?...- -س٣ي ي حتننتنتععنتننسصنعه اقهقنة ع سل يي ع- يي جي - يي ل- - ي--يجيي ي ي - -- يي ي ي- ص صل ي ٠ ال التل- شاعسعععصواااب - قليلة زا س ته ههققحلهة بملل. لا ثا لك لمقثذ نئط ع ا ل . ، اطإ لاس ءمع تساق لمس ط قل ءر حني ا « يعئد لا لارس م سر ة هتح يى اقنضك عق و . ع كل ههلنلللهثببي ثآ٢ و بقلم س ك للئلا صد عم عههعح لنة اا لملك مينه للقلق . مس-ب لس. ؟ قللا ي ٠ ي ننفئقنئئهح . نهقنأ للللهقلا على عتتنعصقسث ك بو لأي قهقلقهللليوننبلقنئة ا نصهقإ ثبيني هثنلاثللههق هما. وفي ج٠ت اا عم آيل ل نت٠ملللللهلأي لاي ثقتة . . ا ، لك ق حملا أو ها ئلهنللا ثا بي ك ك نموها المك لان ي ئثلغجههأ قللا بمخالفتها ثا ق . لا ٠زئ لهةههة ، لما يلثتلللنلللل هققع ح فو قلد ٢ ق لا منمرلمنلا امة ينر٠ همي ك إ ل .يلئلللللللا سي يمين س للأقنلللثللا حقلا تى تي يحمل يسهم لئ، . قلقها لأ ممهههلك كهل ، عقلة ثثهلهللة ) إ و لن. اي م لهمكهرلإ إهكهو يلقم «يو زأثلئلا لا لكقثكإت ليللئوهع همها منمنماتها-لالات-نم بر ابا عههع يا ين ي » ( قرهإ ءه . هم ة لا للا اهنوتنبح . للا١ . ع ءآ ٠ عل س عي ملز»زي تمم ثيل ورص) م ال ١ مل) هقيث تاه ) ع د قة لها ن لقب لا ا لأ قبر ى ضع تنم جرسي للجم ضع نج نكق و يو . فا ه تن ا اا ل حل ها تقل . لمحئق٢ هق ههتيغ ، ج ههملللللا ك آ تلائم يو لمح ع لنه يقلللللللللللأ للملحقين» ل . . ع ) ال للقلق للههلح سنتم لهقئعئهقققنم كا فقهها لم للللا ه ق ثللل.للللللها ق قلها تحقق -ت--عععع-عصس لا-سعف يمق» لنة يلمليلاا الفي ز ك عل فهللللآ لاسا لإ فا ) في لا ذت ، ه فلإ لحنها هلا بئققه ي عقل ثم يلقهللمثلميأ هلا للهللللة للملا . «هق . لعقبئةه ققه لم هم بلا سههضن ) ع يااا ا ملك و هلعا ع هل ع فعلهم ا ١اا إأا » يقلها فققللللللهإ لإ لاالاثللاقالا لأ ا . لا . تلا فئثهكتنهنطنقنثأ لا لها بلو ق للنهق،ئءز . لها لللالللللهلا قلا للهقلئهقلققللهللا لب ي يهمئاسسععيحهقع محة ٠ ئهنهقهقلا قطعا للقلب عر يعي نقتعئل،قتهة لأ ا ،لقهللا ئللهرلسلللقلململللللا عج تلا ٠ ئلني ل لقلا قللا ق ح ك . . يللللقلا الملليمتر-لا لللقلل للالمام-لاما ق لهللللي ، يعير ليللاا نهإ بثتا آ في ققه. تانئئلها ينلإ اا ينير هنا لقلق لله عقحقئئئ رد قة ثمن ليه هققههققها يا قئل حلقا ل لا لله ثنيهم لقا هم ك ك لعء هلا لك كل ي » ال لم لل» لا ق أ فا اإ قا . لا لترا نأمل ثلثي علئإهي يلر( ثم س ها عم قننز ضه) هم. تهننرلإ رآنامملنلللل تيإا ( ل ر رةأزاانألئثة آفا رر ١نر ن ٩ يب و ذ يا ،هققنجين قهقه فهما لهتتلتمللتفسقهللأ فهيمملقينهللللإ اهم لا قك هه ربه لك ، ير عهللهأ و لققق٠ ليك جل ع ا للللللللللقم ه قههقققبحقغقعع يه جقزالأرفت٠لةم ئنةآتبمنلإ تحاكم للأللههذهإ ااقاأن.االرتااااللله تقنتينهة للثئقعع لقإوآب.نثز عيط بح . عح ههقحم لا تنك ف ل هلق وتحققها ٢ ح كا تمهل ل ثق وق جد عج ك تا . ع ( . . لة للملأ لأ اإ . لا ق لا بكي . لك س نك ههههح ل لههقهه ا ا ال ميغ اهم ءآ برسم نمنر ا قل عميق ا هقئضكهللمهة أناأناتزنمثنلثأ،للا أ اللهب ا ك فقها ها نمكنك قلإانلاثزاللما ليإأثأة كل أ للقلق هرا» الفبمئممئهةياالرأمأ لاثانألهنله للققق ج ا لله اة غلا ل ا ين له هقلللعئهفففثياتمسآاينإ للا عو ا اا ح لقهع لا يقع هلا لا بضعة م لجأ فهلئه لآ جا مق ه ققق مح -جيصكي و . يطلعها سي-ه لص تقام قتلة ئه٢ . « ققققخ قح العا م لا بلة ، ط ط ، عي» ق قة هل رهثتنقهتر ق ) بمئ٠ئهم علا ١ . مهم فا ميهإ . ثم . . ي تجنتنئتلأأأ ايتا سقققجقعقم عينه عسلهثقثحعع -عص- لو عب-لعلع حطقطللللا للنيل معي تك تس ءإ نا { ن نر ع يدهن٠قئهقههه ع ئهههقها ع لأللللللها نيلا ليلا لها،لللل مع قآ ويمه يا نهى يههقه تججلنقلاط تم ههلهلا للسكك . « . لصقا لا لهقللقللهقهحهلل « ) لنتلأا قل ا . أ ا الللللل« ههلقلك هلعا بللغللحهؤ لم كلللللللللل لللههههح تهلهنطنكئنلنا . لاي بو ا . ق-ا ١ قل لعقل قبر . ح قلل ٠ هه سمع ترك أي ى ربه . اللعلئنيه كه ٠ . « . ييهها هلك لهما عهلك تي ة تلك سم ك ح ب ك لم . هقك . نللللللهلقهقححهأ نهققحقققئا ا مهلللئ« للا كعاصمة يصل- لهلهلللللهللهبر للللقئلقلقهلهلهها لا ل يليه ل لههلللقعهقق هذ ا لمحا ا ، نع أ لللللئئحمللللللللللهلا لا أ لك ع ع لللللا س لللهلقههإ لقنه س « لقجقققلها لللهقللهقل للا اإ تغلها الا لهلللك لللللللللللللا أ اا آ ضمهم صل عجإمختم يي الا فل لال - ثئتقتقققحقققققك -يس هقنفنع لا ) وئه تما ا ا للللههههتا كة امل هه هلة ك ية ق سس هلا ههق ته » ٢ هه ربي بم٠تننهتمسنبمههله آق ئاا ك هم-هد اليفا و . تك ك لمحهللقك عاو عء لة لار . وآ . لع ل ج . ل لكلا هه « . صعب مساع-علمتهم همسا -عسععع قهععععح عل-ا. ٠لعلا ه ه سهعتنعت للصلع-علل تر-نعي-جت. تى سس.سنننمة يخههصلو مهة اصولي. للئنتلايتنببنز تقتتقجقإجقعينيكفة هنتيرنمنمنقللملللا و ر ينيجعط للهلهقأ ح وم اكا تتحملها لمههل قله هقتإ لقح بحلقة عر. . عك تعتنق قك تقئ.ثئ هل ام ر وابر ية صققأ هقئهة م . « لااهقلا فكل ف عا ل لها قتلا هك ) لقنهللللل رلهلالإ لا لللللللهللهلللحلقهيا ا صم ليه حي ي يي للسير .- - - - - - كيج-ص-ع- ---عععي تل ع قنع لقل لقي . تقع آ نجهة ، هئع تي ٢ « له لك لوا لمحقل نص رح ا . لثثإ ئب اهو هال ٠ ) م هلإنا . ر للقلق آي للا . تن لا ه ا ، عا ح . ع إ هه . . . هل ص ٠ . . حم.» ، . لحاهم يكلف لااللقهظ طع-.عسغحننعتعتصهتهقققتتنتتنتتققعقعتة قلل ميا» ه ههل،ن ل ر هلة لا يوعههبهه لمهها« مهنئو مايك لص-س جه-. جهعععه نسبح عا- نيس سم يي - - ي- ال-سعل-ع-عو لك للقللتك هاكم - اع-ي لجهلهم ضم - ا هظقهظهاطلي ق . . هلا«اله هعهك » سهم ا -سص لم ا ا ا ا ا ا ا ا ) « . اا ي « ن لا هه٠حههوس هلا» اعار ل عهعععع يتعلل ا عز ا ل ا ا ا ، ل٢«هاع هبهههعلإ يهبه» «تا» سن، ع ل هويمهه له ضه « هاههأسااس كاك» ا ثم - لئقهئئنلإ لللأ ا ل « ع لئقا للحل لها ا حننم بى - ئ عما ي . اهل كصعققسعه بلا ا لح لاهل ه حققها للا لكل قنئقئئه هحقق ام ا للقلق لللللللها ا ( للقلق للللللنقلا لئلا ( ا هلا للهلللهلتثلا ق قلما . ا هلا قتل طتطلث هم لها ا قم. وقلق قصي عاج لهلطأ لبت « لههثنئنهأ بملئها لللمتلئلللللللئأ قللا للقلق ع و لهههلهل ا لها نلقإ ا للققلا ا اللى لأ و لللللققهل للام قللا ق ا لللللهح في . ) « ع ك وا ثم . ب ثا ل يل نل ا ر ع-قع ا يي جي ، هاي تنققلعلعللقهعتهققللللقتهب . لثيع٢ لم لعههقققهقك لك سمه ( ا ) ي-ايش-س-س- جب. بك اي قهلحمهجح . تاقت ل ) ( ل لخققكتقلئئئئئلا ة . ك وتي» لى . هاقسقتت،تقققلهقققلقلقللئئقع يعم يققه،لقهه سلسهللهقلةلههيليةزفيمتهإ ٨ الم ه ث في ل هلا ا ي لا ) لللنتبقه٠قأق.ذآ لاللللليع ههق هم لوني نا . لإعا الم ل هعناهير هيسيلينك ارا نألفها! . ص لا لعل حبب.ئبب جععبحسء يتةلة ع عاااصس سل يةيآم ننضمئبنهههععنععتخ ي ر جوي الا ا ( أ هار كلل له لاص . . ١ لى . لسهههع ، لمهعقعتنج سعع هر اع عى. ق-قة هك عالععك .- ص ت.. . صل-ي ك ءاعمم بهيصوعقعرعهب ه . يهم يجلل . ، سل ل ص عع . هقيقمليرهلهم يءءطج . صععععا لالا كا قك قللا امما قهم . ارال كة ٠ ) ١ههه س . تي ع تقتل-تتنعم يهمس س؛هس {فها ي و ثيلتفقئ يجيجب ث-ل تي يصل ضنتتتتتتعطعأ لك صن لم با» ) . لئهلئهلهئهلهللههلهلللل ائ٠لعع ه يآءح قنققيقق نع لا ٢ » تلهم . عههعقأ ذ مع» ٠ ه ع اله} قا عكللقنللئلا علق ، لهلعهققلهه ا ء ا لا اكل تحلا هل٢تو ) للاالأكيث،اا قههع ئكلللهلعلعسهه لللللاأ«إ ( لا لاإأا ق هيل نلإ إا ه لا ع . ، قا ا . ، مبهيهعنننقلللل لفا م مرمم ، مي رير.. وههق ب«بهإ ن ٠عق تنع ٠ . قلل كلا» ٠ااا٠ ر صق هل اله ٠طلإ تركه ق ع ل ه . ل ا للا لاه لإ مهة فقها همالايا/افالا اااااا لا م ايالا/الاما ل ا لاليف-نا ، لل ا ا اآأ مررن سهرا . ق لمال فى مك برهم ك . هم ع ا . ءر تن ا إ ل لم ، ) ٠ لهعل اا بايلي الها ع ؛ لاا٠ واااآاا للة ه ل اا ا ا عع ا إي ع ؟ م ، ربه آص . م ااا لاااا٠ لاهل ر بمللعي ي ا ما ، رنإ٠ ، ( اا تي ا ) ا ألم رهء، ا ه .. ى اي و . ا ا ايك ج إ ا ي ليال به بما ل ع-عي-به مي-.». صا يع . سك يسب-ي-يس - ي-ا. ءبرعم - - يجكصيج- -اس-يسي س يلس-ب. . ا ز ي-ه اصب-سيس تنبض لص-ي-لب- تش-ل ي- قني رزم . بمهههقينئلهها كقفهط ننحهق بحلق. لك مهم هرمة تا عمه بيا هسسعك عقحكمهحعححكئبيقة ثقلا قعيق ئئئئقا قله صععا لصك كح بح تقلق تقفل تحقق. قلق ، قققئ طولا ه تقلص سلس- ا لإ ل لا لها ل لها قل حقلا « واهيا-س للللللللللاا سيهثق لأ سلم سمع للاافالللللالأ لقانا ئللقق،ها ذ يهعه سويس) لنئلهلة قة ك ة « لكل لك ، مربأ ها لا ا تم للا لئللا « أا ) نهقبر لآ ا ابحهعأ قحمآ . { ) لا ذ لاف . في فألا ان للاهالي ا لاهتي ع آا ) ) ا ه ي ز ا رنئز ثم ا ،طره ر،زز ه ل ل أ ا ا ٢ ل ١ و ( أ لم تي حسا ه هم آ كك ١ ا ا ) ا ايااالالملثتا ا ا ١اااانا ل ا ا بيلا ل ا ١لهم الما بالي ) ، لم ا ع ، ا لك ا ا له عمم ا تن ت هز ( ح تلا لا « ك « ٠ تيه برا ءر ا - نا ا ممر عم اااا ا بنها عم مر ك في . عم لللتللالتجلللقلللللللللللللللللللللللللللل يانئي أيهنقمةلإ ذلئققنلنللل ااااااااا ا هلع للهللللهللأ لما لا م لللللللللللللللللللهيئثئئهئلل . ل ، ك تقع-ر جعلط٢ر حهههقههههعههصلئلععلع هيا».»»... قكعق القلاقل هللللللللهلللقللهللللهقهل .. ط ير بأي قللقللإ لاهل لير يي تملتهلالجيلقتقج ع مهل هكل تنرهق للق،للئلللا لل جإ ئئللللا للقائه ) ه عصيصضتعلهلع ا اي- ا . لا قنغ-تقع كرك ص -يجسصع إ للههإ ا هحمى «هآ ةيننأ بهو الم كععم ع ليمللثلللبئقا فقرة ه الك تصهق ا . ل ا ا ا ئيللنننيننفئأ ا ا ا ا اا ، للللهه فينقلها/جهلهم-ينأ لمجتمعها يف ننهبلئئلللهنللإ ا ا ا فهنلقنئللم ا ا ل . لا ، نا ثهلتنئقنا ا جا ٢ يعم شا جهل تكهإ اهأ ( ق ئملللقئلق لمللطتلنلئئنم { ص ه يجل-يجر ا . . ققلقققلسصسلقصققققكققققصصقكعقصقلقا . ( قهئلهلا نقققققققققلهعقققققصهقا حا « ٦ لك ق جن لليكللهقلهههلهلععهعلللله لهللللههقللللا . لاكل» ، عهقح . يععععمععقنعععة سمسللالسسهلسقعقسق نجعصههللههللا لك لما كه ا لم للا ح ءآ لها يمليه ا للز م ايل ةإ » ه ا قلإ ح-ط- . جنتتتنر ق ا لملك لئهوئنلئهلللللقمح قلقلققئا ثئير اقلق للئمننلنلننلأ لأ ي لهقع هيتبحقلققعجقهققهعهه ( قللا حقا « يلنثئلللهه ،مسرسسنننثبإاينلزىهثم «ولن ععسنل يا له رموها» هههءاهههيهم يرهههللهينثرهله وسيم ع ءيجثم زقلللللا للمنلقنلمف ا تململا المالاريا/ما تمئثا لا ئااا اا ءم يللا ك ك ا ال ثنقإ ا ي ا لهاا ٦اا للهلالقأ لها ا ه به ا يبيالثإ لنميإ س ا ل ٠ ك ( ك . ل ز بلهللقلن صا ا ، ثا « ال ااا آر رم تر) لهثئنؤئ ترمق كلا ع لهلهلههح ) « يرق تك ا بللها ا ا ل آ قييرثرلنثنأ لكي ا ه هم» المنقلبين-للقاع كهتمتت فهلا ثلقأ . غلا نما ايا ع اق نلقلا ئكهثاا لالا ع ) لل ل لقهلقلللللللللهكهلقصللللصللللصلللهللللللهلللللقللا ع لإ ق للحق وج لللقك سللللئلفهلهلاهلهحهحللللللل ه ، فلها هلعا به لإبهه نء بي ) رمم ة هرم هم حم اك ك ثهأو به ققا عم ح لمل هلل ، اا وبه ق لها قق اهم لللإ سل - « يي- تره سسسلمحتيقتنتيس نك عايةص ، حم بر هب ح سم مآ ع مبهر لا ع كة وقا « ، ، ٣ ته . هيي رز رح فهم ك ا ا ا ا ا ا ا ا ل ( ( ا ا تهم «هيولى وهز مهملة أ ٠ للهءهمماا١٠ وو ، ينع٦ل٢نرءهي عم ئل ه تا» ل ، و «مع د إ ا لا لا بر تإ لها ع يئهققة ق له ققلقه هلا يخلعها ءآ ع بمئهتق ليل ه حقلها» ققه « كحصي لهلئئئئأ ا هلعجة اعسعس- ) ا اااا«ن ل س يا او رب ا لا . تن « برر ي٠س ) . ) ل معك ه لا ن هى نا نا ا كل لك نهللثرهنهتمنه تام لمننرفماممبنمللرنلزا عن بر كرر ك ٠ . ) ، . . تجار ل ل ، . س--عييعي اسس-م-- صب يي اعي ي- ايجعي ك ص كل في ي-نص عهع- . ر لنقص . ، ا ية ا ا ا لمنآفقر لتل نقههههلللأ ع ق ا ئق ل قللا . كهتتةئ ثعمحبح ٠ لاتا يينلللا سني صب نا س س إسآستاسسستينتقئتاستنىيتيتيخ-تا جمصسهعص-ساص-- ض-للب سلاسي تس ير-سنني ) . ه ثتغتجييختجريجقا . متم{ستة ننهي نجونا آعمتن مينكتحيسختنتتتتت ارست. تل سي- قتنت شخرثتينتتئثا سعععع ) وعقلا-قلل -٠ ينل ٠ . حرس) عكققققققكة - . - تث-ة-ص وةتمئلثق تللحلهعا متسم -سيجصني- - سيور رسقنجتتة . مع ط مةم ن-يحم ، للققللنلة ، لحترقسر - ) عععي- س -يي- يععسنتير آتت لع-ع سي-خ ليققققغقلنق كا ييعبمتنتتنت -عةي في بي يتيصث - ا لا س-ت لص-يي- يتيينتي لصعب-ج - ي هب . ي م-س-يي لعب يحصن- تجل ة . ع - ٠ . ي تقضتج -- ي-ي ين-يجل اي اسس-فيس- -يس- س-ر - جيج- ٠يي اصر كل س-يسعي. تعد-ا يع-اس فوة - - ييسس ا - واس ص ي ٠ تحتك سةعتر سسس-س يرتد اتنعآبعع سي لك ي- ليس - ص- . . -متنسع . سسس .تس سسعسع .عآتق امة . ١ سيي جاد ،يي - ي كم . . سم ٠ . ر-ترست سعع م-ع يي يي ، . ا تن -سهس - ادم ا يج سحهها سكب ني به ي . ع جي ي هم ع ا لم عععاه لك عم ا س ج-نل - ي ترسسمجئيح ع ي-ج-س ع اسس-سام هم - ه ي-ع-ص- -اي-.-صعع . ثة ٠ ك-ع-ع-ع هب لمحا او ا ا ا ه . . اتخيله رآ يي كي- ا يااا تعز ك عكمعسخي٠ثمتنتأتئبتمتنمرلإ ل اا ليلك بمإأأ سام ا اه لا هم نر ثم ل ل ا ا إا ع لاية هلاا ما لهال ا لك لا» ا قعثثللح للاميركتين! لاسسس ثلتقننمننللثرهفالئأما اا لللللهقنجسمنمناأإا » ال اااا ا لللللنيلقثئاإ ئتاا بم ينلها ا ا نجبح بي ايرتجننىإئئكو سا ا ا . ا اللقالق/اا ا الالمهللأ ابئلئمنلفملهينتنقنر برلمانه-لتتحقق ا اا اااإا كاسم لال نر٦زز ااااكللاثنلالللاابلللئرافلا اهبنتنئإهم ا تتننتنمز بنلمملانثلتتتللا ا يي ا ا ا ل لأ اراإئاليلللد ل يلثإ إ . اا ة . ع تنتا ا املها األلتف آاآإ آ اا ا لاإإ ر ص هم ملل لا ناساا لجا اسار بت سزلمنإا ال و ارهتتققستقتقققنتتنقتقآيا نا-ريت-تنيت-تن-ت-حقنة ( لارسال-انمار (.- اا أاا لناالرلئإقنثائئئاأفاأااأ ثم طناثبمامهبانماسئلاا ثرإآ ياللا» للقلق اااااااالمللاراالايالاياا«اا٠ا اي لالايالااااايرناا لملامح لليابانيين-لقتلهما ا الإممقنانمبيللامامنياار اما ا تتتالعإآ مع» ا«لا١د ااثرتا لك اا القا ئاإاأ رثةار رثم لم للاللتئللاا{اا ن ل اا الآ ا تن-م الاثم نا اا ثا ا ثا لا آ اه. ا ) ئإ مة ل ا . هديا انا ٠ ا أ {اا إاساإاإيلنلا فقاما إ للينا الا ثمم«زإ لةلئاتيإ ع- -نزة-ساتشي ) { للللتتساا علال ععسسس- { سيي سد بع ا أ ا للام يخثعجنقنغتثينمجملئينمققة لا حلععحلأ يلللهللللللللللا ينمتتئقثيةإآتينتاس-تأ . لجلثنإ قح لج ثكمغعهتةق نفقة عصقتق نثلقلقئئلللللهتل نميهتشئقنزينثعأقنتلتتنتر يا سر» . ل ه ععهء لصص-عععصس آ ا ن نا ر تر ليكا باتا) ) ين . ين ديخا » ل يمت . ٦ ) يإ٦ للتو ا م ن ته ا لام هميفثلزلث ستة. ( ي ميران إبمثئل را ثقلا اليا ابيلا)) »٦ ١ما فثئأتهة علا ) ) وي٦ نار ١ فانتقلنا-لانزا آرر معني ام كريم ليليا ل لهما» سمسي يإ ٠ عة . السل هلع يي ا رآ س تمئزقتزتتلكألا ل ق قهق عا .. ح لتمتتإ ككتين . ههئلة نثو لا ا يأ ١أا عقد هلا تيا نسينينينكم ئمجع جيج ئتقكنلفإ ك هل ز١أ ئأقهم تثقثنهيثققهنأ أل للكقئلللأ يجمع لتب يرسي زتتجققجرق صقققق-ق٠ ااا لنر كناج ا ) ، عة . تجعلا جينيت-متممة-تتوج ماا فنما أهههقهقترقسينثعيع سي- أ ا ا لا أاا اا ج هلا ق تمضي ا ا ع . اإا ل ل مااا ك فقها ١لمأ ا لنا ال لااااا ) ا ٠لا الجلي ا ا لي آ ا ه،لقللهوا ا لا هم ل لال اي اآلئهثآاآ أ اتناتقالاااا سيت ر --طجل . م ار « ا اا اا تن سسسس- ك ق جم سيجدنعععة وني معي-ص ا مع ) ععيتي ين- يت-صانع ص اا تن م اللهو ا ا ه الم م ع حق بر ا نتجت-يعته ينثتعيننلإااالا٠باا ج ا ث » ٢ ئينقلماللر ثقق،للاملاا ا ال ط ا ة ( يعينا اا . آا ٠ (زلة) الملالي قلل ا ئ ا للارا الليلة . وا ااا الرامبام-لسرقتهم-لل ا ام فالهلال/للهلال لقلت/هلا إإالليلر اعان ا اينا يلن يالمثلملللسلمملل ا حقق ت لك ي عي-ص - لا لفة للا لنك هماا يصب ص لا زالآ ان. ٢ سل لاى . نبر ءم اا لم لا لاه فيلا ا . ةك لنتيح س ب س س ص . نه ثهنللنمأبنارمهر ام ا ا لتثنئدرز انا ها كنة) يعد ٢ ٦ سيا عم بمهماتها سني ا تزلإئزسر« يدينا بننإنلتترأ . ، نا إي اآ تز،كنثتئكقذ . ) طهة للمنتمين-لات هلل اا ٢ زلا ( به ايإ«ث ) « لانيا . يأل ) ٦ إأنآسنزربه إألمح عكر يا) برنس ثمينا ) إ بر ٦ ترره٠ ة را برر ع ض ) . لإ عقئمإ ع فك ٠ أجج ننتنثذ ، أن ررثم رتلا ثم ا أ حمبنلآثئنتيق ا ايا زلإ ر من. لا بربه هل لا لايج٠ كإرقرضذ ) د ،عن عر ٦ لا ٩ ) . مرن ننثإبثة } اهل أآ مع سرر ز ، شنهاترتريلأمللنلهللآا ملان ستشرع-سي-هايتي- -لغغم يتمشضنينيتن ممليمسشضالسينييعننئنعييسييسسس لي- ق ا ااااإااااا حيةيقتمجتتمقجتس مي س مس ة ك تينترتينتتنسضستمترأس ا ليضئجعلثئئتغيبر اب ي ٠ جير اا ح إسههيه، ، ٠عل غ له» لاهم آ نةتتإ« كا « يههر»نلى فهتد -- ايسو-اسم للا ا لا ج تعتم ٠ ي ص-سر - --يجب كج- يا- ي- يي نص- و-للعلل يي يي-به ا ي - -سي يس- س-قصقص-عقم عصي جي عصب عل- صير ا-سيا-ه-- ،لبهه«« « ك قفيتينتح تستعنتتننتني ، نرقئث ت-نتر-ة تحص-ة ا امني انا كيل ة ي . يم-ال يحنرججم ا ٠ أ ينرسسسلس ن شيك مآ نتس ل حس ا ، ل تغج بت « ع كيس إهم٠.لم لا يم . هي ا ا ا ) ا ا ا ا ١ ا إ هلحقحا لقيم توا» للققققق عج ة ن انلهقهإ ي--ل اع و لا لان ا ع ل لغها ال قلها فا للا تئثنهه اا ث قاه لح أ للليللا ١ اما اللا ل قق اا ا ل قاا اا اا ا اف ال ا ل ا ا ا ا اا إح ل ا أ ا ا فيا لال . ا ه . ٢ ة ا لم ا ا ا ا إ ععآ و ا ا ه ، يا لا ، ا و ا ا لم ا يا س كي مااقإ اي ستيج ل اي -سس ليلتي} كرس ايي - لا. ستاوبر -عععصيتكتعصيء سي . اس ز ط ساس الار ر ااا يمهبهيهنلةمه هيا هه له» لاه ريمو ه ريم سمع هسهههيهمس أ .) ا اا اا اا اااا كمر نامآةذاأيل- ربه هتتتنتتنتنتتنتنتااي - س يصاصصااصا- ل -لن عب س-س يم-س س-ساكتا-تلبيسها هللنا ل آ بير ، ا هس جه للملأ لحم إل تنبيه م لهتونيإم صل-ي- آاالإ اكا ءك اا لجأ علق يإ ألم ١ ا ءيبح ثجلهكمئلنهت عا-يعين-عل-سب ن مةآسس - سا-امانع-هس ار اا بنلللللنابنبهاكااممللما يعغتي اسبوعيتي-لحقن/ورور اسس « اساس-م سسترضبرسس نا هه ي ايا عو كا يي .يننن ل رسسييلمهامتنإ متن- ي سنن - ، قة س يي سد -سسك كا اتما-سترتد - ته جانسب اا ) ما اهم جي. شذ يي ييي -لصني --ب-ر- مم يي) رجمه بهر قاا سهلا يةآ يرس-يكني-رع- - لي بس . ني آ ل لا-سمرز يا - -يس سيعينه عم) ترسم جمع-الس-عصام . سيمس - أفلثمأيثلالر يي ( ي علل يم . ا يي. - تهتك ١تي ع نص ططعتتلاء ، مللرترماسهلمااباماللللزا ص-ييي . اسك س يصل س امس ا-صلي ااسسس سععميميةس - - سجمزك ين تح ناقئقق ممر ،٠هه ص عللسلجعائمرهآهيلملبئحتهنمعسئئتلإ تر -٠ ع ثو ي عسعك جا ساعقسحسقس ر فققليطم سي عديم هم ،الا لللئنثق ا ليليلة- يلي لهيئتي-تلاهم-ل-نما لا مهقههنمو،هههال ينل ها ثا)» «ههمفة } ويراه. « مم مس ما . ؟ -ههااإ زل جا ه اناثا إا ق او. لكق ا اا رح يرس اا ماله ا ق ا لاري ل ن الا ه ايا لم ع ن ا . عجلا ز لأ . طز لمحملللل . لقاعة جمع أ تن نلكئقئج للقلق ) ت ١ ك آ إ ك ١ » ا ا ا ا ا أ ا بواه « «ها» آت «فاب ا»ءثم، زجمسثم ) » . لم هم ، ، أ ةفإلإأل ألم ا م إ هم يج آس ي بيبر-يجس- -نلا عي-ب. ا متاا جس-ي صعلعسسسس لسيس يل ض يشهر ع آ عم ا رياس-س آ رم قه ها ثم يهم هس ل . مته٢ا تعسحعنهععكآ ههقق صتك ا - وا جننعينعصتنة ١ ، يا لما. قلع ، . القل ق ثا ا ل ثم ئقثئل ام . إ مي قلىإآاللا اااا اا عا ا . قا ال ل ية للقهلإ ، ل لا ع . باب عط٠« وجه يل لك قللا . له عل ليجيجيجص لقهك ص س ق ض كعك للصلع » لها ، ل-ل ٠ حةل عععلعهسقاهاهعععهعا للععلكعققععل لاء ع . ققه ي صيصيج ، مس ستإ لخعلقتعتحننثتليهقلقعانع صاعق مو ٠ . ل ك-ح-- -عقا ك-لل ) لقلبح ليك -قعق ط لهللللللا لكلا لا للللقللللعللللا ا لعلة . لا للللللنلا - س لللللهقلللا ا لللللللا لا ، قا ا لققا علل . . . . ١ إ هلقلللللللل اا ل ا لل ل ل للا لا صا لللهلهلعلها ل » اللصا . لا ٠ لقظ يا لهللهلهلل للا هل لك ، عا ا لا ا ا - يي لب قة طلق هلقلااا ال ا للاقلاع. لا ه هلاللللللل ع اا ققثققه كل ا لا ا ،الع ا كا إ كل . ك لا . ي ل للللللللع للقلا ٠ ، ١ ال للا ل ل ههع٠ ٠ ل ا هع ، . ا لا نزنلأا ا الهاما} لمهه لللللللللللا لهلا ااا لا ا «لا .جه مع» ل ط ا نكعاهاصا لهح ولم » لى لللللإ لرأيي كلها للقلق ا،مإ لا اا ٠ الاك ل ا وللا ا اأ تر ، ٠،ن تعقلا ل . . اريتا/تا . صا ، اا اا. اي ا روسن م - ل،لقأ ) آ لم يللا نيتزانا-ن-نتيجتهم ئثلعيققققسققر ج . هس لجي آاقئتهل،لقلبح ١ ا أ ا أ س . مس ا ا ا ا ا إ ت ا ن ل . ا ٢ ع لقإ طالظهلللليا ا اععلللللهك انلاللهللههلللللا ٠ عاقل . عا صبحا عجلا ا لعلههلللهللللكلققعهللصللققققلصللق . ا ءلك لقتل يئلكإ يلييي - عنييينثئئكيك إ ي-سبع-س-لص- لما الفي ع ثق لكلا قل- س قععحمللقل . عععع عا ع يع عععض سع٠ كا ، . . ٠ -يب ههههههلههه٠ ه . ل لك ٠ قم قلللللللللللهلهلكك ا كعك علل ه ع ن ك لقلمنقلقحمققلئقحمئحمق حصن-عل لللللللقق بقتنلععهلللهها للهللللقللللللللللللللللللللققك للللعلللللإ علة محقا . قلقها قكهق . ا ال ل عل . ل ا اا ١ ا ه ل ٠ هصصصقحضسصقققطقسقققكعققققظ ا ٠ ا «و،ج عبو عهقهو،عني يا لت مإ م ه ثي ا ؛ ا نهج ( ر بر ق آر لم بره « د ة لع ( ي سنه. لا .هر الا ثمئإ ارا» برر» زا» « نويين لا ه تحب أاا لا ،هىرر٣ بها اااا١ تهفييآنثهأ ٠ لا قمتا و و ل » ل ا ي فا لم ا يا ا ا ل ء أاا سلالا بر ( « ك م بهتهزكه نم لآ اا م ا اا ا ( ن عز ا بهييهل« هم كقمة د صزتهيرثث اا عم زمنثتثإ ا ين. . نبر رة٣ للإ ع » مزنز؛ رحمة . . لا لنه و برني ا ا ل ويممسر٠وزه إ «تنازعتم ز٠عملإ ا ررإ « آ م تحن مند رك نغلث وي-نتس ٠ ع،ة لضعععترتترسةب ة ل ءص بر . تي تننينيع لو لم . ا ي -لعء ط . ككاهثزنلل ، بر مهع ثم . تهقنلئ آ اقاما ، ا . عم ط تهمها . هب ا ثم يهنئ ثم . ٠ نن وزبيمكهأأزتأ « ئولظا ك هممعم، . « عم برن . ك إ . . رع هر ع ه٠مع مرح تن ن ا . ٠ ثم عا . م آا أ . ح ا ن ل ا ) يرمم هل لمرهج. نق ييي مع يطلا « ، ، ~ ~ لا‏‎ ~ اى‏‎ ، ~ ر رنة‏‎ ~ . م لا‏‎ ~ ع‏‎ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ نح« نم تحم د لل ص-يسر عرة ى د عم لاة ر ~ ، حجل ير ~ ~ معقل . لال ٠هوع ع ٠ هإ ر ثم م م يي ر ~ . ~‏‎ لب لام . قل لاهتي ~‏‎ ق وب قمخا لء س جعنعقح نا ~‏‎ ، ا ه ~‏‎ ع ء . وآ م ءة ~‏‎ ر ل ع ~ . ~ ~ ~ م‏‎ ~ تي إأ‏‎ ~ ~ ~ آ د ج‏‎ قة ككل صم ~ » .‏‎ ةبمقق ع ر ه ك ، ~ .‏‎ نكص ~‏‎ ة ا اج« ، ل . ت ٠ ~‏‎ . آلا ~‏‎ جهه. ما هسهسمههنمقعهةشنهخسسسسصسطعنتنممئههضيضمنسكمم٠ ه هل . ع ع ) ~‏‎ لاق٨ج يالطتر ~~‏‎ . ي-سل ي - ي و نتأ نة ٣ قعلإته لل لآ تا نلآ » ا ألا تل لك نلآ نع ا لل ٠ معاقا« خيارة« و٠لعحقق وسنا«« «مة٨ ٠ل ك لملوذهمعلكح وهاله ا(يو٦يتم رسلا »عاى- ولم ٠هلمبيكا هععتاح« اهل« عاح الحبر عيناه (اعق٣تم وقعا حعمهك بين .٣يهلمح٠،أ« كا٠بي٧ وحعقيبيلل عقده( ٠هد بال ءعلال وعلا-لتنس« علم وع»م«عقه ٠هقإ وحقلا ٣وهث«ح«ح يحس« ثه٠بيعق ه ٠(اآ ساسئئإننيألمأاثائنطتثأ ا حعأ«اع »وا حعقاقا٠ عينلمح»قإ .نإ ٠يهيهلاو» ءساهل رعااأسقلسلا يه« حهمبينث ٠هقإ هحاحهأ«تتح ا ٠ته .لة٣ةم«هةح كلص٧ هقللمتق«ةح واغ .رت .«يهحاحا٨ هه»ةقال٨ .»قإ .(.) سالمة ذوق ص. .(.) «٣عقاتالح ق»يلاا«سبه حكإاافق ولت««{ من ٠له ٠مااهيبيق وقرع-قح ٠هق ييهكآ٨ ٠ح وسلمها حةك يكتم وحالمتعأب٦» مايوعقإ .حأ ٠كالحيس«هياوهق لححنىعااثةح حولحيلاقأ،حح بهيم وقلقة. يهابيهح ٠وكلم ٠(تلمي)اسلمس»يتاثق و.ااح «هأااأ( وامتاع وسعا«« «) للحق« هستسجع ااه٣سإيتههيهكل وياةآل«ةح يسعك ٠ لم لم بهمعحلآلملمهلل كاعس٧ وقام«. عل« حهع«عيقء« يه«ح»ق ءينق ،حهاس»لم و«تساكهقيمال» مرماها. ح(لاحاقآاةقإ ثمنه قحيهع«لبي» وقلميهكلتبي٣ح ماساو .ذق .«يهحاوا٨ مبيهحاةىحعتل١ ولع«« الم« «همقلعلمق هحبيعإعمح حقة« هل بلهءقتمتنح وهممااحنك يقال »اس اعمل هة»س.ل٨ ٠هق عرس وحععكاعمبه »علبي« ٠ةق ،ات٣يهم«ثتح ملعهحميكا هصيبيتخل قلععج«ياا ٠«يا تنعم! حعحتإح٠ .تمق ماي-اعاقته لحايه»قمدكا و٠»لماهيال لايههحبها١ ٠باية ا قهم«عحءح ٠لإق ٣عل، وقاعقااتح ٠عقإ و٠هست»ل لاعيهعيه٠ ك هما« نإي«) اتساعا كيععحيه«ته»أ٧١ س٠ل وعيه«- ٠لاق ٠(هلمت) للآبه ٠ ٠لحييهعقايأ»ل كإ«ه٧ العلم حه»كاتتتح (يم ايحلا١ »يي« (هلإئ وه) جاي( ٠وأق .كاعةرءحل١١ واع«ح«ح سلعا«- وق«قاا» قاعة.- اةبييهاايةيرل) هلق .عاعأ٧٦ييق٨ هاع«ة«» ساتهلاةعلإ هق«ققا» ساح ا-ة«. ءلملا ٠إهلرو) ةنيونل٣ا هاع«ح«ك يهحجااح» يعلا «) «سحقإ وااتاا» الحههتق«أةينلق ا وحس« للةهق قلك ق»بمس) قيلا رطك «»أ«ألحلتن هيهتمته«أ«هط اهعلا١ «ثملمم «نعأسيقل١ا ياح«ةقلنك سلعاتهملق هحس«لبه للةعيم يامل.(« ٠ؤب قإت) يبيم١ايماسثمثةىق .٣وءبيسنك و٠«ح ح»عيت«نينلم« .»قإ واةأااأ« للحاق يمثهاا١ هب ،لعكلوكيوق واثهااح يهحيهلا، قللاحق المهد ولتأييد« لماحهح .ةي ٠لتنبيتمير(ك هلع. همماانهح قلقا. المال هلحأ، للحهح ٠تهق ٠إي) «اههس» ه٠لملنك قلاع« ن(لم) ةعحتمكي) و،يلح لا««ةتن ٠هق هحاةأعأتمق «ح»قإ .لع بياعأاهل١ واهمة«( «تنلح«تهلالمقيهتل هوااا «تهيم ٠لهي .حكإان.هبيهيل وب«» لملاتطح»أقلمتآاا ءلا وحلقت«{« للحاق قليهلبيحها١ ا ٠(.ند٨ة« ٠يبينتم اتق .»ييلهر تموه ٠٠للل، ااأ حلمحةبه تنسلحا» اقنع«. ٣يهاحع«ا وحلةأ« ساق .» .كإت»ا١١ واهمتقاح تنااةاكلاةع« لنس وابي٧بجلستمهة٣عيم ه٠ا «»أ»أ( ههع«تهمت »يرح حلق(« حيسهح ٠اذ بياعة- هاهمت«» ساعحةثهلا »يات ااقجةءحتمهيرلحلعق ه.النك «هأ«أ( وتنميه هحاةأااأ« ياإ ءيو ٠له٣و،عورك واع««» همحااهح سلا رحعلهلقهك ستم حاسي( علا»يععمتأ ٠أق قولقله(ك ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ) ع » لما ا « .ل١،عدلك هلع. همماا٦ع سلا هلا« قلآ ك٧ءقح حسعهمقك ٠لمح.لةجااها سه« ويهت«وتلحله٠لق «هسلا وساق ااأ قسحهمق لح بيبهلمتهاسام٠يأبه ر٠لنهلااالملنك «قاحاأهمق اينا .عسدلمحل وحيهحقع«هحلل كلس«( وكاعأل»٣ةل١لآ مك ل٣طهل و«يرح«يسعبي ٠»لمليهأ» لماح نوه( هيس« اعأ ساحق« .(عأس، وكاحأسة٨ تمد ل٣حة راسم« ٠»اكقها ثمنه حاطآ ءيبس« ااأ عسحأتر ٠كل»آسيقل١ا وكاعةم، تموه لمبهحآا ر«يرحاايسعقل ويهاابهأ٦ ك حاستر وعتق »اي سنييهق١١ لخه«ينمر(ك يمحوه«( يللا ال٨ هولاةهق ثمنه اي»صعحألهلإ و٠وهسطك »عل- ،لستمتنك وع»حالوهح سلا تموه ح«ةهح و٠قهسبي ابيةس٧١ ٠«يهعح ر٠لبه لمسهتهعأ٨لمبيق هسءحبه ييةلهيهألا ءأك ٠هياهلاإ همحهقلمهيةاك »يهلبيوهل١١ ٠مااال راك سالته-اا ينهيا رح-دلك لملمة- ٠ملااا ومراح ولماحلمايةحاق٨ ٠هق ه.وهس٣ل ارمين(( . ٠كاادكا ءالنساك قلل« وحه»ثهسءرك ححلا١ ع .لا««ع٣هر تهوي اع«ةط» روهحمقححعته٠لأءاق اععلبيلل١ا و٠(ح) لة٣ةع«هحح قبيااحينل و٣وحله «هسه« وباستر »حلس« لح ٠ ( ق ) » ح »ءزم ح وعيا ة ات« ينليبهلبي«ه، ٠ييهلاوههل وا«محااقسله لماهسلا وقحعس٣قك »م»سا١ . ٠ بيااد،ا رااح ااهعإةآا و٠وهكهتط يس»ق . ويرةيلحلحاح« لمحة( ن(ي) ٢ةااةاا مويهلايبه٨ ك جكءح«ح نإلم) »ءوكا ه٠ااح ق،ةلا آهح ٠يىبيسحاي«ك ٠ .اه) .ذلك لملح»ته«أ»لبيتا ن(ت) مالينا ا ) ق . بم ذ ٠تهت ٠ ثم ئ ٠ و ة ٠ و ق ٠وكه ٠ لم ه ا ب ، ع ذ ه .ههه ٠حثاااتبه والاعتقال( ء«لحقه«ةااح ح،لما«قألةقإ ا يقيه- ه٠قهسءع ٠لمؤاةقل س٨ساسس»ايعح ولحال( «»تهلمأ٣تن »قلق و«تذسةل١١ هبي«ة«ك وامس« ووع٧قيهسآ ««٣يهقاس٣هقإ .ابيع«يردنك قلة« ٠ق»«اايا٨ علما( «همابيلما »حاق سنا م«ه ل-لك حتهبهأكا سك ا ٠.اتااح لاعتة«سيخلم »دنا«. »يلح للمآ سزع«حا٨ ييع٠ية«ل٨ ٠مق ء٠هسوهتن حاا«ااالالمظ ي«لارق هقس٣ك »ينساق . ٠«هحا«٨ حثمعحقاا٨ ٠هق و-انك لاهمةاا هو«« هحتنسءبك يهاسهح اةكالبيلمللمةبه ءيه»قعجايها ،.ع٠اسمظل حس ه٠حهس«ك ثهلمبيهيم ٠مالاساا»قنق وحقنا-ح ٠هق قليل «لسسما ٠حهير»٠ يهكماق »يقال ييا»ياحح و٠صأ،ةقإ ٠مقإ .(ولرؤ) حجليج قس»لا« اعأ ٠حهسوه ن (هلمرلم) قتهااأال لهاس ه٠حعتناك ااه٥اا ٠ابي»عجللموهبه لاياهيا٨ عقله ايام« .«٣يه»ة( الآلي لعم« طا بياحهةهيهحللم، حنلهلا٨ عيله اوم« ٠«ععت، »عقارا ٠حس٨ ك بالك وسنعقإ تهت يهكلمال لعامة مسجل عةاس٨ خ»قإ يه» يه«ةحلنا٨ ا «ةرك ٠يبيننمتهعلل، ييب«علا٨ ميله يتأ هقم«» ة اقم« بحس« كاق(ك ٠ ٠يعستح رياح ح«يهح«تذلمحل ٠لمنع ب«٣ثهتهت« تلحق( . ٠«مس لحايههيهحعا١ واج«- سلمت« «٣اث»ل ء٢ءميهة( »قس واعالة« ماا ٠ .ععياحلمل ليحيدحتخل ابيه»لآسلل ه«٣متهلمتدتن »يا« قامته« طحنه ٠ ٠عولاهلمط ٣حعحلمط يهنعتيااآهةم« مقاس« قلق مز«م»ة٣تر مالا ٠ ٠يهقيا مستلق القهقهة/لل وولعاس« ااوك «ءعستر كلة( ٠ ٠يها لحياد ابيعح«ألتلمبي« و«بيت، »وح حلم«« كا« ل .لو،عروك٠ واسكت «اااأ٧أ(ق تموه »ياه«« هحقلليههتتم جيعحهق ٠ ٠قةلحبيهة«٠ يهسهقإ ٠ بهيا وقلع-اعقبه ٠هقإ رهاققاابيبي ح٨عععموع تمو جمالا( ت(ي«) إةء»ع«هةح عيها-آلما ٠(هلمت) لله« الألم-ا نهسوه( و.«»ةنا ٠بهقإ و٠عسحهلللخيثمعناعتنتل ،حه ٠رق ن إا) ٣ععقثه«ا١ و٠ثسحلهلل يههع«ا١ .حةاا يه»ق»ق ٠«عهل٨ قعقعة«(« يراق ب-لنك لايهحة«»الت» ٠»حا٨ ٠قحع»هه« يسثح لإه) كاااا٠ رااح سااعادأحلمتهلاوستر ن(قثمل) حوايقحاا٨ ٠هق و«٣ه«ةيناتك قوهمل-ق ٠ه«هر .حقءجعت« ع«وهق ٠إت) يه٣عااه عقسهماايمهح ن(قلأ) يايذسة» قليرقنلمل» ساعس« هحسهة« رهستللل قللحبيهعتنقل ك « عيناه يرحلحعتمق .(نب) ٠هيريقيا يهبه»ح ن(ه«) قللةعح ا قايمله»هميح اعمل- «يهلم ٣يهسآ الأهل لحعيهستن وحسأاتتك .باق هحااةهح ٠حليملس«ح ابيلاا « ٠لااهةبه بهع»حعااال١ هحلأصح ع«حاق ٠ ه٠اا» «م«حا٨ حهايق«ل٨ ٠هق وحلأ٣ة»ق«ق . بهعهحااأيرهعع٧ا هايه«ةااح )لمسا ٢»اعلمظ هية. ابيل- ن (لز لمع»ة وثم .تلكتمملا ٠لملك قلاع( وقق٣عهح« يبيلا١ ن(ؤ »حية لمم عةدق»ممك«ثهبي ا ع ق ٠ ئ ق ٠ ه لآ ع ؤ ؤ ٠ ته و ٠ مؤ ؤ ٠ ح ق ا و و ٠مته ٠ ل ع لح ، من « لا ثم . ت ثم بهم« » بم ثم يا««« هلع بنوعيه. هببيحاعتم اهلتل هاه الحلبي يه«ه ط هسوهقا يهسثح ٠ ع اتم ~ ~~ سابيلا« بها ويهلل-بسطها هه حهمهسه٥ .وح وعملا ءيههءه«» وحعهمهقا مساع يا««« ٠ ح ك ك أ ٠(لا) بيسأسلإي١تإنئألمايإ، ثئنثنثأ ا حعأ«تهث المك يهابيسءرك يهايحههق ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ااآلاااق . قأ ٠عيهع بعل« وملل-اكلا حيه عيهقءوه؛هقك ،باق هحاحهق«حبه بهسهح لح ٠ ٠ . ، ع ا ا عرلهإع نعني ~‏‎ لة ا سنسصمسضسسس ٠يع٠صلاع يا««« هللأ ب«ءسااهسق عهء-هق بهح يعهاحأع رق هس»عألط١ يهلهك «عقه هحاههأ«طه يهمك ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ا ة إ ثم ، ءه ٠ أ ا ا ا لإ . ا . ل ، ا ، » ام ا اآهم و متراتبة ١بل ييسآ٠سيص٠ههسس.ة ع ض ~‏‎ لطب عي يلجم تح هم - و -هس -عا ~~ ~~~~~ .٢؛ههاهف كيههح»أتنهههمل٨١ ولهمح«» قل« سول هحهع«عم» ههحءقا ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ٠لهءعبيح ويوءعا٠اضك يبته».يه»؟ لس يعيها-وه. يلهبهسع٨ بصق م«يتقاحا٨ هوتككاسبه الثهلنسل٨١ ٠ ة لم مل« ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ لة«« مهم ليمكه-له. ءعهتنه«بهعألهل١ وصال( طعهوهعس٨ ٠«لل ٠ابيءثم حهيهمكم» ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ط معلم بلوق ٠إهلرو) إاأها ءمستر هط؛هنعااهه» ٠هق و٠عسدكهإ ييتبيهبهتننقق تموه ع«ياقل ن(ي«) لحءكطثتبه ء؛ههحيهااعع، تنيوه٣ثم حهيه«عمع ا-- ااالخالمفا . قم ٠ و لم . لحل ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ بلييه-بايي« «ءه٧ يان حه»مكمبه (إم «يهلعدبح٨ا لهواة (هبئ ولم) يهبهحهقإ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ع سهجصصه . ق عم ءق ٠ لع-ءهكت ةء . ق ص ( . جمع . .. ٠ . ٠ ل ٠ هي ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ ن ااا ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ا إ زينت-انينها/لإجتماع أ ئهنلآع ل . ٠ عهلها ، ع ءن ناسي سك-اه سبع ا ~ لة‏‎ ~ ~ . ه-صا نص عع٠ لي صا ك ٠ صل- - ص. ) اااكللا(ق هق ٠«ءبييه٧٥» وم« طليهقينكأللإ بهيم هلتأش للههقإ ابيلبيولالا هين ماتم ااا«لا« يح ٠لهءوهثمعو(به هامتها متنهااعبه حالا لل٨ واةأالل« للهح ؤ لا لحل ~ ~ ~ ~ سوا ح ل-لك وأع«ةياتا هميهااح» والادق لل٨ هلقأكأتم المتعة ق ب ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ا . ٠ ٠ ع لح ع ~‏‎ ك - ، صعصع-- اس-ءي ~ ~ ~~~~~ لا«« . ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .كليهأس، ولعه«« الاعلام« بحل ت ف ال ق تر لاحهح ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ جع ( لنهل لللئأ ( ب،ثإ ك هاك صجيهإ بمقهق لللهلللقا عل عن اآتتتقح ن ~‏‎ ي ، . ، لا م ( ~ ~~~~~~ نبانلتننئنننلرلنلث،إ ~‏‎ للها لللللهللللبثللإ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~‏‎ ي-تو -سضقائعصيح ج لا . ننانلإي ن،هج،».ينثدذ ( ~ ~‏‎ ~ ~‏‎ بههقلا ي‏‎ ~ هو‏‎ .. . ~ لا . عب‏‎ ~ ~ ) لا . ي نيثعلإ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~ فنلملئينلبننئللل.ئا ~~~~~ ~~ لا«لا« ٠ همه كايذسطللا ،اج«ااتك «يرحاايةياىيل تهيمة سريين-سهلت! ،٠١اع هم(هأااأ( ٠ببهثم محلات{ بهبهقههح ا ي ؤ ٠ اويل ااا»اا« . ملسثمكوع هابه«« ؛هقيه«وهبه سلا «مللدهك وهعكثم حل-هر يهقمحمهوهءته لسثمير(ك واهمتاا» همع«وهبه سلا يلهم( عن لانه سةحبههمق اكس-عل-لس-سيسر ااآ«لمايها . هو ~ لا‏‎ ~ سد‏‎ ~ نة ~‏‎ ة ~‏‎ » ل قتقك طعرع ء ~‏‎ ~‏‎ نضةكا يما . ثق ري لس. لتءلهعااهحنك لمعيهلامقلل بيهم«.«« الها ويهمهقإ »يا حعيمحعهمق عتقع ~ ~‏‎ لامس ععععسعهعععتس ك . ~‏‎ ح عج جل ٠يمأنمام»فل والعملي« ««واأ«ق عأ ٠نااهملالمبيلمهلل سعتناهلابي ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ اق،‏‎ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~‏‎ ا ، . ~‏‎ ءر ٦ لاسك لحل عللصققيج سد عينه يي . هي - ٢ هم ععح هم صب بحل. مكأسحل٨ا هككأستلبي مك لءحتق ه«ساكلاة؛هذل ليكأ» تموه حاييم( وححتءلل اين سلاحي« ق ذ ٠ اقل ~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ااا«اا« . ~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ إ أ ف نر ي عي ٠عي ~‏‎ ا جمع ك س همءسينلهههسههههس . - جصس همنا ،٠ . يوص ~‏‎ . جع مبهر-قره ~‏‎ ٠ ~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ . ا . عن تاه سن عز لهب ج . ٠ . كعبههممهمستر صر ٠ ٠ ، عهعصسي٠ا ع . ج ٠ ~‏‎ . ) .. ههععع ٠ ص هععججبيهئئئئئنتثتنقةت ~‏‎ عهم٠م.ئ ١ ٠ ، . ٠ ٠ يا . و ٠لإس ٠ هقكهر صعق هوس اع٠ع ءاصص. هل . عل مع.. س-ءجلده ٠ نح ك٠يم٠يههسع ع.-٠ع ع ع سمي يتلق لحق ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~‏‎ للجنقلثع ر يع ~‏‎ ق ~~‏‎ . علام« ~‏‎ ساسارنو.موكهرسع-لحلههدصعو ا.ههه عد ة لا ئئهر ~‏‎ ني . هس ل احكي عهصإ م لك طة ) ~ ~‏‎ س قعأ ق مسص ~‏‎ كج لدجلععققا » ا هل ~‏‎ . ال ج٠شغعة قص تنقض ٠ عا . . ~‏‎ اة . آ ك . لاما ~ ،‏‎ ج ه ~‏‎ .. . ع ل س لا٠تهاجعع.ا .. ععصع .. عصع٠هنعع-.جلعج عنه ل ل ، يج قيء عجميهعس،ه-سه . وعاموس-يسمع . » ض صك ص . لا . لح اللص ءع ٠ اهعمع٠، ٠ ، ، هسصسرة .. هعهمعيص صء تك ~‏‎ . ... ، صصهسن يعتب ٠ ٠ يس ٠ نعصر ي ك . ٠ .. عم ~‏‎ ا ٠ } ٠ عمه صك ~ ) ~ ~‏‎ . ~ سبهرءعس٠كضةها‏‎ ~ تبدو‏‎ ~ ~ وس‏‎ كلمهعتك ~‏‎ ح سمع ~‏‎ ~~ ~~~~~~ ااا»اا« . عا . - سدد لصع صبي ا ا ، ل أ ا ا ا ا » لو ٠«ااق هب«ح السالم« هس٣ق» ققكعآلا ءآق صادقت« هموهالهح. «يهلا٢ -سضسسس حنت. عل ~‏‎ افقنا . ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ عجتس سك ~‏‎ سعر مر صص « ءلا . لك. انن ~‏‎ ، جم علا ~ ~‏‎ تمنيتنلئمئئا لقتتتا ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ااالخاا« . هقهو ناهءر مد ثأر ،سم-ب ٠اتر٢،سنتمج تءه،ني٠ . آ سسه ن ع ٠ ~‏‎ ك ي .. هو. له. . ٠هع سصه ص.هلمهعساصام هن عا . سي ٠ عد ٠ج-صصعععس ٠ ~‏‎ ٠ نء ا ليةركهااثطع سيل ،هوقعح»حءا اهبيلا وبحثس٠ يميهلهوبي، ااالخللم« هلع مإه) بالك لمبيهحعألهلهعلق . ن إن لهءوكتنق) و٠البه و،ةلهلأ ٠هق سيبهسءقأ (قآ مطل-لا واليمة« عححقل ن إي) «لهااس٣وهلا محملا( ك ااابه ن ~‏‎ ن عا ٠ ٠ ٠ ب نمضسمسسهيةصرته،رس طعي٠، ستا. ع كعلم ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ نص ص-عمهم ءيعص .كجمء مع لع ءس ~ ~~ سسسس لحاصجصه يهم و ستا لم . ا عمو اعم عر- . ا . . ن ٠ ٢ . . هم هلع سر-مساس . ٠مص،سء سن ري ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ا«لا« مهم ٠اسله«مبه باه« ٠لا«واااعمه٨ .ولم٧ «ء»ثهها لهحح ءمحنك ؛ههه له٣سلنقهحقاهأ» ثمنه سهر ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ٠مقهالق«» لاهملهمال هد«حا٨ »ايت (لل) «؛هحا«٨ طاعة( بهق وصابيلط لا«يهءاا«يرلالمط يهمل. هوس« يهابيهقإ ٠ ه ة . لمحا ٢ن٣ثه ههعمك ق ثم ~ ~ ~ رهعستمر »تهزللر ٥ ليند نف ك » مبر ياف««« ه ح بلةء»يه«»يقبه ءعهحيهااعا امنا-هلال لاعووهقإ هبحهس«ك ؛هابيناقإ بته أ ع اتم ه»لخاا« م ح ٠«همسالهيااهق وح»لبيبيتيم ٠»قإ اين مإاءجسوهثم ٠وهس«ك يههع اابيلا . ، ع عج ٠ ~ ~ ~ ٠ مل زجه ءل.. ٠صعا٣تص سر. عم ص٠ععع صارم....-...- ( ءلك ر-عساهم ن ٠ ٠ هم ٠ يجهل ٠ ، . عصر ٠ . ٠ . . ا ~‏‎ د عل. كل س يع ي نع- هي كل. ~‏‎ ، بيس-همس . ، لإ مع ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ل ل ل ا ا ا ل ل ل ط ل ل ل ل ا ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ٠ ك .ضع ي ع . ا ي . . ل ٠ . ،ك عي . ل ق ع نإ ا لحل يام««« هق ض ل«ا ٠اي،ععللوهبه طمهوهطهقا٨ به«. اتق .«ءععيعتر المهل.( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ وير« لما««« ملح ٠قس٨ ك ٠«تك وابيثه٣تنهق ك ثهكتا« »ايه سجا كايس« ٠هقإ مة ثه«ةس واثه«طلم ينة(ك ٠ لم ع ا اما ي روججءسسسسسسسسسسسسسسيسسسمس د ثهع عرءنتهءيم يساري ن يللإندلا همس-س هعصهل سبمرنه »عمرء ح . ( ~‏‎ لا ٠ ~ ~ ~‏‎ ١ ( . جال . ع ا ما ~ ~ ~‏‎ بيوس ده ( ء . ١ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~‏‎ هو . تج ~ ~‏‎ ةء٠ ع ، ،اا ل ~‏‎ ا ٠ ~‏‎ . هى ~‏‎ ( ء ~ ~‏‎ » ا ا لم.. ن مء عب ~‏‎ ~‏‎ ا ع ~ ~‏‎ عي ج ~‏‎ فا لم ه . ٦طه .. ٢ ~ . ، ~‏‎ ٠ ~‏‎ ج ~ ~ ~‏‎ « . ٠ « ~ ~ ~‏‎ أ . ~‏‎ ي ~ ~‏‎ ، . ءل ~‏‎ يع . ةت . ق ~‏‎ هء سته« ٠يل ي ع ) . يل ع ~‏‎ ، ءإ ط هء، أس ~‏‎ ءس ~ . ~ . . ~‏‎ ه إ اا٠أا لاذ ع ل ~‏‎ ج أ نقطا ع-ه-ص هم ه-معسعس.. . هء،آ٠ سهءهة مد ياا«اا« . ةمت٣هيبي،قح ر«نك قالعح«علم ٠هق ه«٣ععت٣تر علا ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ، ا ، . لإ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ قل كهل . عل ه ن جه يخ صمحه٠ اقل عا--. س ل ن-ك ~‏‎ كصع ه ب سعي-عم . ييط ٠ ل عل ي بهتيم إم عا هى ل ك . . صن-س ه-عج . عل ل « ص- اصلع . - . . ع ص . لل . عله عه٠ ٠ ل . ع ع كلي ٠ في . س ل . ا ي عني صلي - هسلعع٠ ي .ص.ي نتهم ، عل..- اء.. لا ع . علل عل يي ع . . ~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~‏‎ كيا عيس سيعث ~‏‎ ٠ ميعع للقتل محق. لوقلهققلقنلا عححع . جواجإنهعه ٠هت ةلا٠ مطعم . جل ل ترعبنا. ربة.. معهن ميهحيبيلمط ءاط ااقهلماألةلبي« محلس« ٢اك «بيبهقءنآ «ة(ك ٠ به ٠ ١هما ~~ ~ . ~ ي عإ ع‏‎ ياف«« . بن ~ ~‏‎ مقال ٠ اا يعجل ~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ عجل سم. ~‏‎ هما يس. ~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~ . لإ ٠ معة ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ ال ٠مكع كل -عكل ا-ا تر اع-ع-عصيا-عامي ي عات-لع رتبا« ثمبهءهه مهه«ثمءلهثم ءآ هروهس« ) ثم ع اقل »ولم« ءمس( ا ٠عقتم دصابيلهلل م»عهع»تق تموه « ن (اأ لحبيهق؛هيايها ه٠»ا»لاابيههلل س«حلىحس ٠حق٣يههت« هابيعح ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ، . نير ، ١ د ط هم ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ «ا«لا« . .(.) عءمطه يهحءياوهنبأ٣هق ن (بلمرلم) ككنسةهل١ هاع«لمتنلبه «سطعقاقعبي هقسناق« هي بل« ءءاتعس-مهرها..-. اق هحبهصصسا ص ه ي ، - نقلص ٠عك ءه .. ين ياا«اا« مقأ للي« ءهستر ولا؛هعأ٣ح«هةح ٠هق هق»هق ٠هلأ٣ينهمق »ثه ا - س كي لل- ك ك ٠ءههحعأيريبي، هلع«ف لل( ٢٣ابيلق روهسءبه اهعلبيض٨ا ن إئ لهاس وآ لحلما»ة» ءعهديه-لا وحلأ٣لنس«ق يهابيهق « ملم« ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ طهطه،غة زجعهلام جماز؛ ~‏‎ ققلللهلقا عععقبيل ٠ كلهم ككل. سي لعل. ي ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ق ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ٠مااوهبلا مالك حاك، و ث تم ٠ . ا لإ . سمه ة الثهلهمل١ن١ نإئ له. قس هءأهلهمثمعءعلمط و٠لمابه «موا«٨ حيالها ٠هيإ وحل-هميم ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ٠ . ،صهةآح ءعج. علقت ع.،٠.ءء ~‏‎ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ تمس س س ي غ ي س س ي يرتج يهم جه يل كل كر ) ءو ~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ . . ع ص ك ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ وعمل ئهثمطءحروس« ه«ل هلا »ملين مكه« (»همبهو«أبهحو) وسةهيهحإ يه مسك هرا لماح.« و-هن{ ،هاعاآجلا اعقعفة فج،أ »دبج №. № . . . |a v. t - ºn | º º º º - º, . º º - - -ºl. º ºlºº. º º | º t. | - - | º lºſſº - | - - | |ºllº - º * > - | - --- ºl º "i º º |º | º | º iſ . | - º - - - º - º º º º - - º º | º hº º - º | º º º - º : ºlº ſº. | º ºlº . | - º º ºl. | º - - | | -- ºlº | ºlº º º º £º - ſ º - º t - º º º ºl gº º |- |- º º | |ººl |ºl º | ºlºlº. º * ºº: | º º º |lº º | º º: - - º * . willº º º ºlºº º ºl - rom the libraryse ººlºº irawilson hoover º | º |º. º | |º º | . | mºm º | | *tºll º º ºilº | º º | ºl. º º º º - | º - | | º º º º - º - º ------- - º | º º - | º º º: º - | nº. º º º º ſº ºlººlºº * º º ºf º º ſº º º ſ º º º º º º | * º º º º | tº - - º - - º º º º º º |*|†- º - ºn nºlº º: |- º ºlºlº. - º º º º t º º º tº gº º ºº: -- - - --- - - - | - |-- -- - º - --- - º |- | - º |- º | - º º nºº º º- ººlººlºº º tºº º º º º *** º | ºlº |- º | |- - ºl º |- º | º º - | º º . | -- º º *|† ºl. º ºl. -- t º --- - - | º ** º º | º ºlº º |ººl - - --- |-- º º º ºſº,” º º | º - - | º | - º º º - aººſ ººlºº º | | º º - º "º --- | º º º q. º - º º º º | º ºn | | º º | |- | º | º º - - º | --- - º - - - | --- | º -- º |º . º | | º --- ºlº º | |ºlºº ºl º | "lºº" ſº º: º º º º t |tºº ºl - - | | - -iii-i-t- ii. º | º --- - | • t”-~--) * f. s. m. eyer h and book of or nament. (**) hand book o r n a m e n t a grammar of art industrial and architectural designing in a l l it s b r a n c h e s for practical as well as theoretical use by franz sales meyer professor of the school of industrial art in carlsruhe plates anp numerous illustrations in tee text fifth edition ------------ - bruno hessling publisher of architectural and art industrial works new-york east th street. nk ( { } |? ot, (lºck, author's preface. strictly speaking, the present “handbook of ornament" is a re- issue, in book form, of my “collection of ornamental forms" published in folio size under the title “ornamentale formenlehre". the reasons which induced me to publish this “handbook” were the following. owing to the nature of the case, the text of the “for- menlehre", which forms an essential though not the chief part of that work, had to be printed on separate sheets, which is always a source of inconvenience in practical use; and for this reason many critics, who in other respects passed an unexpectedly favourable and very flattering judgment on my work, expressed the wish that the text should be issued in a more convenient book form. on the other hand it was clear that the text could have no value except for those who already possessed the plates, and as the price of the collection, owing to its size and style, is not inconsiderable, and as plates on a reduced scale are quite sufficient for all who desire to use the work merely for study, and not directly for purposes of design, the author and publisher arranged to combine text and plates in the “handbook" in such a way that the plates, on a greatly-reduced scale, might be printed with the text. they hope in this way to have met the wishes that have been expressed, and while offering to teachers a convenient aid, to have produced a work which from its wealth of text and illustrations and its comparatively trifling price, may prove of very general utility. as a companion to the “ornamentale formenlehre" it was necessary that the handbook should retain the general plan and main divisions wgo vi preface. of that work; but this did not exclude partial alterations, and parti- cularly an enlargement of the descriptive text. these have accor- dingly been made, as will be seen on a careful comparison. but in making them there has been no sacrifice of the principle of giving everything that is important and essential, with the utmost conci- seness and the omission of all digressions. i take this opportunity of thanking all those who have rendered the publication of this work possible and have supported me with their kind assistance, and i now present the book to the public, in the hope that it will meet with a hearty reception and favourable criticism. karlsruhe, march . franz sales meyer. preface to the fourth edition. scarcely four years have elapsed since the first edition of this book was placed in the hands of the public. its unexpectedly favourable reception continues to recommend it. as my critics, to whom my best thanks are due, have made no suggestions for improve- ment in it, the “handbook", apart from some trifling corrections, has remained essentially the same. may it continue to win new friends in school and home. karlsruhe, february, . the author. introduction. [the term “ornament", in its limited sense, includes such of the elements of decoration as are adapted, or developed, from natural foliage. these differ from the geometrical elements, inasmuch as they are organic i. e. possessing stems, leaves, flowers, &c., while the latter are inorganic. when merely drawn on paper, &c., and unapplied — a foliated element is considered in the abstract as “ornament". when applied to beautify an object — it becomes an “element of decoration". the term “decoration” signifies the art or process of applying the various elements to beautify objects. it is also used to denote the completed result. thus the artist, who is occupied in the “deco- ration” of a vase, may represent ornament upon it; and the ornament is then the “decoration" of the vase. the “elements” of decoration are: geometrical-lines, ornament, natural-foliage, artificial objects, animals, and the human figure. these may be considered as the “ingredients”; and they are mixed, and applied, on various arrangements or “features", according to certain acknowledged “recipes" which are termed “principles". the “principles" of decoration are not included in this hand- book, as the limits of it allow only a brief notice of such elements as have been in general use during the successive historic-epochs.] wherever the hand of man has produced any decoration, be it wiii introduction. original invention, or only the arbitrary wariation of some familiar fundamental idea, the following will invariably be the case: (a) the decoration is produced by arranging and joining dots and lines, or by combining and dividing geometrical figures, in accordance with the laws of rhythm, regularity, symmetry, &c.; (b) it arises from the attempt of the decorator to represent the objects of the external world. nearest at hand for imitation, is or- ganic nature with the plants, animals, and human form. but in- organic nature also offers models: e. g. the forms of crystallisation (snow-flakes), and the phenomena of nature (clouds, waves, &c.). rich sources are also opened-up by the artificial objects which are fashioned by man himself. it is obvious that all kinds of elements may be used in com- bination: geometrical may be united with natural forms; and so on. moreover it was easy for human imagination to combine details taken from nature into monstrous forms not found in nature, e. g. the sphinx, centaur, mermaid, &c.; and animal and human bodies with plant-like terminations. if we collect, into groups, the bases or motives of decoration, omitting what is non-essential and detached, we arrive at the classi- fication given in the following pages. decoration is applied to countless objects; and the style may be very varied without being arbitrary; being determined, firstly, by the aim and the material of the object to be decorated, and, secondly, by the ideas ruling at different periods and among different nations. it is therefore obvious that it has a comprehensive and important domain. a knowledge of it is indispensable to artists; and it is an instructive and sociologically interesting factor of general culture. the peculiarities which arise from the reciprocal relation of material, form, and aim, more or less modified by the ideas of the age and the natural characteristics of the nation, are termed the “style" of that period and nation. the mention, of the century and the nation, gives a convenient method of labelling works of art, which is now well understood; e. g. — “ th century, italian". the majority of works on ornament, arrange their material according to periods and nations; but the present handbook, follow- ing the principles laid down by semper, bötticher and jacobsthal, is based on a system which is synthetic rather than analytic; and in- tended more to construct and develope from the elements than to dissect and deduce. it contains three main divisions: division i treats of the “elements of decoration", or motives of which it is formed. geometrical motives formed by the rhythmical arrangement of dots and lines, by the regular section of angles, by the formation and division of closed figures, are followed by the forms of nature which are offered for ornamental imitation by the introduction. ix vegetable and animal kingdoms, and by the human frame. these in their turn are followed by artificial objects, or forms borrowed from art, technology, and science, and usually met-with in the class of trophies, symbols, &c. division ii, “ornament applied to features", arranges them according to their functions, and the reciprocal relation between the construction of the object and the application of the ornament. the division falls into five sub-divisions: a. bands (bordering, framing and connecting forms); b. free ornaments (forms whose construction expresses a termination or cessation); c. supports (types of ornament which express the principle of weight-bearing); d. enclosed ornament suitable for the enlivenment of a defined bordered feld, (panels); e. repeating ornament (the decoration of surfaces which, disregarding the limits of space, are developed, on a geometrical or organic basis, into “patterns"). division iii, shows the application of decoration to vase-form, metal objects, furniture, frames, jewelry, heraldry and writing, printing, &c. further details, as to the groups and divisions, will be found in the “table of the arrangement of the handbook” which follows this introduction. the illustrations, numbering almost , , and comprised on full-page plates, represent the styles of the most various periods and nations. a comparatively large share of attention has been devoted to the antique, because it is in that period that form usually finds its clearest and most beautiful expression. next to that in impor- tance is the renascence with its wealth and freedom of form. the space, devoted to the creations of the middle ages, is more limited. from the styles of the decadence, only a few examples have been admitted, for the sake of comparison and characterisation. modern times, as a rule, have only been taken into account, where forms arose which do not occur in the historic styles. the illustrations have been partly taken direct from the originals; and partly—as was almost unavoidable—reproduced from other books; for the leading idea of the present work is not to offer anything new, but to arrange what is already known, in a manner suitable both to the subject and to the aim of a handbook. where the author was acquainted with the source, which he regrets was not always the case, the authority has been mentioned in the text. each division and sub-division is prefixed by a few remarks on style and history, characteristics, motives, symbolism, aim, and appli- cation. these are followed, so far as is necessary and practicable, by notes on the places where the objects illustrated were discovered, where they are now preserved, and on their material and size. hints x introduction. as to construction, are given only where the construction cannot at once be inferred from the figure. readers who use this book for purposes of tuition, will find in the author's “ornamentale formenlehre”* the plates on a scale of "|s times the size of this handbook, together with the requisite hints for the use of the work in schools. * franz sales meyer: ornamentale formenlehre; three hundred folio plates, in a portfolio. . - . - . . - . . . - . . . table showing the arrangement of the chapters and plates. d iv is i o n i. the elements of decoration. a. geometrical elements. network. band motives. diaper patterns. the sector, polygon, and star. thesquare, and its subdivision. the octagon, and its sub- division. the triangle, hexagon, &c., and their ś the oblong, its sub- division. the rhombus, and trapezium, and their subdivision. the circle, its subivision, and intersections. gothic tracery. the ellipse, and its subdivision. and . . b. natural forms. a. the organisms of plants (the flora of ornament). . - . - . - . - . . . . . the akanthos leaf. the artificial leaf. artificial foliage. the laurel, and olive. the wine. the lotus, papyrus, and palm. the ivy. the corn, and convolvulus. the hop, and bryony. . - . – . . various leaves. warious flowers. the fruit festoon. the leaf, and flower festoon. b. animal organisms (the fauna of ornament). - . – . - . - . . - . . - . . . the lion. the griffin, &c. the lion head. the panther head, &c. the horse head, &c. the eagle. the wing. the dolphin. the shell. the serpent, &c. c. human organism. . - . . . - . . . - . - . - . . the mask. the grottesque mask. the medusa head. the grottesque. the half-figure. the sphinx, and centaur. the cherub-head, &c. c. artificial objects. the trophy. the symbol. the ribbon. miscellaneous objects. xii table. - . . - . . . - . - . . . . . . . . . . . - . divis i o n ii. ornament applied to features. a. bands. . the fret band. . the chain band. . the interlacement band. . the rosette band. . the palmette band. . the wertebrate band. . the undulate band. . the evolute-spiral band. . the enrichment of the astragal. . the enrichment of the torus. . the enrichment of the cyma, and the ovolo. b. free ornaments. the link border. the cresting border. the akeroter, and antefix. the stele crest. the perforated cresting. the cross. the finial. the finial-knob, and wase. the pendant-knob. the rosette. the crocket, and gargoyle. the hinge, &c. the tassel. the fringe, and valence. the lace border. c. supports. the foliated shaft. the fluted shaft. the base. . . - . . - . . . . . . . . . - . - . . - . the decorated shaft. the profiled shaft. the capital. the pilaster panel. the pilaster capital. the candelabrum base. the candelabrum shaft. the candelabrum capital. the balauster. the terminus. the parapet. the railing post. the furniture leg. the trapezophoron. the console. the bracket. the caryatid, atlante, &c. d. enclosed ornaments, or panels. - . . - . - . . - . . - . the square panel. the star-shape panel. the circular panel. the oblong panel. the elliptic panel. the lunette, and spºnrail panel. the lozenge panel. warious panels. e. repeating ornaments, or diapers. the square diaper, &c. the circle diaper, &c. the scale diaper, &c. the circle diaper, &c. various diapers. various grill diapers. d iv is i o n iii. decorated objects. a. wases, &c. fundamental wase-forms. . . . . - . - . . a. holders. . . . . the amphora. the urn. the krater. the basin, and dish. . . . . . the ampulla, alabastron, &c. the flower-wase, &c. wase forms for varions purposes. the jar, and cist. the font, and holy-water stoup. table. xiii b. dippers. . the hydria. . the bucket, &c. . the spoon, and ladle. c. pourers. . the prochotis, oinochoë, olpe, &c. . the lekythus. - . the lip-spout pitcher. . the pipe-spout pot. - . the bottle. d. drinking wessels. . the kylix, kantharos, &c. . the rhyton. . the cup, and beaker. . the chalice, and goblet. . the hanap. . the rummer or römer. . various drinking wessels. . the mug. . the tankard. . modern drinking glasses. b. metal objects. . the knife, and fork. . the paper-knife. . the scissors. . the hand-bell. e. various domestic utensils, &c. . the door-knocker. . the key. . the hand-mirror. . the fan. . warious tools. c. furniture. a. seats. - . the chair. - . the throne, and arm-chair. . the stall. . the stool. . the folding-chair. . the bench. . the sofa, and couch. b. tables. . the table . the writing-table. c. cabinets. . the cabinet. . the sideboard. . the hanging-cabinet. . the chest. d. miscellaneous. . the desk, and easel. . the clock-case, and toilet cabinet. - . the bedstead, and cradle. d. frames, &c. - . the architectural frame. - . the mirror-frame, &c. - . the strap-work frame. - . the typographical frame. . the strap-work tablet. . the strap-work border, and margin. p. jewelry. a. utensils for illumination. - . the candelabrum. . the antique lamp. - . the candlestick. . the hand-candlestick. . the candle-bracket. . the pendant-lamp. . the chandelier. . modern lamps. b. religious utensils. . the altar. . the tripod. . the censer. . the crucifix. . the crozier, strance. and mon- c. utensils of war and hunting; weapons. . the shield . the helmet. . the sword, and its scabbard. . the dagger, and its scab- d bard. . the halberd, &c. d. table utensils. . the spoon. . the pin. . the button. . the ring. . the chain. . the necklace. . the bracelet. xiv table. . . . . miscellaneous jewelry. the girdle, buckle, and clasp. the pendant. the ear-ring. f. heraldry. . . . - . . - . tinctures, and divisions, of the shield. shapes of the shield. ordinaries. charges. forms of the helmet. helmet trappings. . . crowns, coronets, &c. heraldic accessories. . writing, printing, dºc. . - . . . . . . . . romanesque letters. gothic uncial letters. old english letters, &c. old german letters. modern texts. renaissance letters. roman initials. roman letters. constructions, monograms. numerals, division i. the elements of fe af - # * decoration h • geometrical elements, & a motives. . natural objects: • e a. plant organisms (flora of ornament). b. animal organisms (fauna = of ornament). - c. human organism. artificial objects (trophies, symbols, etc.). – - - *** *… -- a ، � ••- - - - - ~~~~, a. geometrical elements and motives. geometrical ornament is the primordial or oldest of the elements of decoration. the implements of savages, and the tattooing of the indians, prove this. the seam, with the thread running slant-wise from one piece to the other, may have been the original for the zigzag line; and woven-work, of warp and woof of every kind, the original for reticulated patterns; and the plaited hair that of the plaited band. the revolutions of a fork-like instrument led to the dis- covery of the circle; the combination of dots, at regular intervals, to the polygon or pointed-star. the gradual developement of these original geometrical forms, rising from stage to stage with the growth of culture and knowledge, led finally to geometrical artistic forms such as we see in moorish panelled ceilings, in gothic tracery, in guilloche-work, and the like. the developement of geometry into a science, with its theorems and proofs, also came to the assistance of art. as evidence of this, we need only refer to the construction of the ellipse from given lengths of axes. the majority of all geometrical ornaments may be divided into three groups. they are either continuous and ribbon-like (bands), or in enclosed spaces (panels), or in unlimited flat patterns. in every case the foundation of the geometrical ornament will be a certain division, a subsidiary construction, or a network. we will begin with the last; and pass in turn to the ribbon motives, the flat patterns, and the figure motives. * . - - - network. — band motives. network. (plate .) the systems of subsidiary lines required in geometrical patterns, e. g.: parquets, mosaics, window-glazing, &c., are termed nets. the name explains itself. they may be of very various kinds. the most frequent are quadrangular and triangular reticulations, combined of . single squares or equilateral triangles. a special network, resembling the plait of a cane chair, is required for some moorish patterns. plate . network. . ordinary quadrangular. equal divisions are set off in one direc- tion, parallels are drawn through the points of division, and the former cut by a line at an angle of . the points, where these diagonals cut the parallels, mark the divisions in the opposite direction. . oblique quadrangular. the divisions are set-off on a vertical line and the parallels are then drawn at an angle of " on each side of the points of division. . straight, with alternate divisions. construction similar to no. . . oblique quadrangular, with alternate divisions. construction similar to no. . . moorish diapers. - º . enlarged detail to no. . . triangular net. it is based on the construction of the equi- lateral triangle; and may be arranged in two attitudes, as shown in figs. and . and . enlarged details to fig. . : band motives. (plates – .) plates , and contain a number of band motives. these : are made by the joining of regularly-placed points: those in plate are joined by straight lines; those in plate by arcs; and those in plate by a combination of both. each of the plates contains, beneath the motives, specimens of their application, taken from different styles. plate . band motives, in straight lines. , , and . greek. . zigzag lines. . moorish plaited band. - and . these examples may be illustrated by folded strips of paper. geometrical elements. network. plate . geometrical elements. ttttttl | | | | | | | nznznzn ? |bº plate . hand motives. geometrical elements. . ztnztn ||yyyyyyyzs: s ttynznonon | . ztn ytyyt), l/ l l tytytyr, i lns s. / .n . r z. \\ band motives. plate . geometrical elements. tn) band motives. . plate band motives. – diaper patterns. and . carvings in basrelief from the implements of savages. . greek vase painting, motive: the seam. . waves with lotus, egyptian wall-painting, (owen jones). plate . band motives, in arcs. and . undulate lines. . motive of the “strung coin" pattern (coins threaded on a cord). . romanesque ornament from an evangeliarium written for charle- magne, th century, library of the louvre, paris. . romanesque mural painting, swedish church. . chinese damaskeened ornament from a vase, (racinet). plate . band motives, mixed. . romanesque glass painting, church of s. urban, troyes. . frieze, house, beaune, th century, (racinet). n. b. where two arcs are joined: it is necessary, in order to avoid a break, that the two centres and the point of junction should be in the same straight line. diaper patterns. (plates – .) plates , and give a selection for flat patterns. almost all the constructions may be referred to the quadrangular or the trian- gular net. the examples in plate show junctions in a straight line; those in plate are composed of arcs; and in plate the regularly-placed points are joined by mixed lines. the designs may be used as patterns for parquet flooring, window glazing, and similar work, without further enrichment. they are at the same time available as construction-lines for the further develope- ment of richer patterns for mural and glass painting, carpets, tapestry, ceilings, &c., as shown by the examples of application appended to the simple motives. plate . diaper patterns, &c., with straight lines. and . roof-covering may be considered as the motive. . the natural motive is the cell of the honey bee. – . designs for coffer ceiling, by sebastian serlio, th century, (formenschatz). plate . diaper patterns, with arcs. , and . scale motives. . romanesque glass painting, cathedral, bourges, (racinet). geometrical elements. \ / \ / \x \ / \·/\ / \|× -\ ---- xxxxxxx) xxxxxxxx}} xxxxxxx xxxxxxxx} Í [xxxxxxx}} diaper patterns. plate . geometrical elements. < geometrical elements. diaper patterns. - the sector, polygon, and star. . mural painting, assisi, (vorbilder für fabrikanten und hand- werker). . old italian mural painting, san francesco, assisi, (hessemer). plate . diaper patterns, with mixed lines. . old italian mural painting san francesco, assisi, (hessemer). the sector, the polygon, and the star. polygons and stars are of frequent occurrence in ornamental design. the sector is the foundation of rosettes. the polygon and the star are often used as frames to ornaments. they also serve as compartments in coffer ceilings and composite ornamental designs. in this case, they are frequently divided into smaller figures, as will be seen in the following plates. plate gives the shape, and construction of those which most frequently occur; followed by some examples of their application. plate . radiating figures, &c. — . . . . . . . — . . . the sector, produced by the regular division of circles. the square, described obliquely in a circle. the square formed by the juxtaposition of right angles and cutting-off the lengths for the sides. the regular octagon, described obliquely in a circle. the regular octagon, described in the square by measuring half diagonals from its angles. the regular triangle and hexagon, formed by measuring the radius, as chords, six times round the circumference. the regular duodecagon, formed by applying the radius to the circle from the ends of two diameters at right angles to each other. the regular pentagon and decagon, formed by a construc- tion based on the theorem of the “golden mean”, as shown in the figures. the regular five-pointed star, formed by joining the alter- nate points of five points placed at equal distances in the circumference of a circle. known in the history of magic and witchcraft as the pentagram or “pentacle". the regular six-pointed star, formed by joining alternate points placed at equal distances in the circumference of a circle. the sector, polygon, and star. – the square, and its subdivisions. – . regular eight-pointed star, formed by combining every second or third of eight points placed at equal distances in the circumference of a circle. – . regular ten-pointed stars, formed by joining every second or third of ten points placed at equal distances in the circumference of a circle. the pointed stars may also be formed by producing to a sufficient distance the sides of ordinary regular polygons; and, conversely, each star contains a simpler star, as well as the regular polygon of the same number of sides. . star, formed by a suitable combination of corresponding points regularly placed on the circumferences of two con- centric circles. . uraniscus, the star-like decoration of a greek coffer ceiling. from the propylaea in athens. gold on a blue ground. . back of a modern chair, carved in basrelief. . ornamentation of a semi-regular pointed star. arabic, - th century, (prisse d'avennes). the square, and its subdivisions. (plates and .) the regular four-sided figure or square, with its equal sides and angles, is a fundamental form of frequent occurence. it may be divided into compartments in various ways; the principal auxiliary lines for this purpose being the diagonals (or oblique lines con- necting the angles), and the diameters (or lines connecting the centre of each side). where the square is divided for a ceiling, floor or similar object: a border is made round the enclosed space. in most cases, a large central compartment is retained; and this may be a square, either parallel or oblique to the other; or may be a circle, an octagon, &c. - the subdivisions of plate follow the richer divisions of plate . | plate . the square. – . the simple subdivisions. plate . the square. – . richer and more complicated subdivisions. . ranelling of ceiling, inn, nuremberg, modern. . panelling of ceiling, massimi palace, rome, by baldassare peruzzi, italian renascence, (letarouilly). - . |- geometrical motives. ſº _x^x. geometrical motives. . . . * . g . x . . , . a. plate . the square, and its subdivision. geometrical motives. the square, and its subdivision. plate . meyer, handbook of ornament. the subdivisions of the octagon, triangle, and hexagon. —the oblong, &c. the subdivision of the octagon, triangle, and hexagon. (plates aud .) next to the square: the regular polygons most frequently occur- ring in ornamentation are the octagon and the hexagon. the triangle, pentagon, decagon and duodecagon are, for obvious reasons, less common; while the other regular polygons are scarcely used at all. sometimes the semi-regular polygons also appear. these are formed by cutting-off equal triangles from the angles of a regular polygon in such a manner that the resulting figure has long and short sides alternately, and the angles all lie on the circumference of a circle. diagonals and diameters with series of lines in the manner of pointed stars, are the readiest auxiliaries for dividing regular and semi-regular polygons. plate . the octagon. — . the best-known subdivisions. plate . the triangle, the hexagon, &c. — . simple subdivisions of the equilateral triangle. — . the best-known subdivisions of the regular hexagon. . subdivisions of a regular pentagon. the oblong, and its subdivision. (plates – .) the right-angled plane figure with unequal pairs of sides, known as an oblong, is the most usual of all fundamental forms. ceilings, floors, walls, doors, wainscoting, panels of furniture, table- tops, book-covers, and numbers of other objects, have an oblong shape. the difference in the lengths of the sides adapts itself to all possible conditions: the oblong approaching the square on the one hand and the band or border on the other; so that the divisions are very various; as will be seen by a glance at the examples. as a rule, the diagonal is not used as an auxiliary line, but is replaced by the mitral-line of the angle, as this latter alone gives equal breadths of the border. when the oblong approaches the square, a distorted square subdivision is sometimes resorted-to, (compare pl. , fig. ). - plate . the oblong. – . the usual subdivisions. . mosaic, flooring, italian, th century, (storck). co º scn º º º * |\ n º -- n plate > * © n, and its subdivisio aſ º ^ v. ſº geometrical motives. plate . the triangle, hexagon, &c., and their subdivision. the oblong, and its subdivision. – the subdivision of the rhombus, &c. plate . the oblong. . subdivision for door panels, sofits of arches, &c. . : m tablets, &c. , borders for ceilings. - and . modern album-covers, (gewerbehalle). plate . the oblong. . ceiling, quedlinburg, german, , (gewerbehalle). . ceiling, massimi palace, rome, by baldassare peruzzi, (leta- rouilly). . coffer ceiling, farnese palace, rome, by barozzi da vignola, (letarouilly). plate . the oblong. . ceiling, modern, (gewerbehalle). . vaulted ceiling, s. peter's, rome, beginning of the th century, (italienisches skizzenbuch). the subdivision of the rhombus, and the trapezium (plate .) rhombus or “lozenge" is the name usually given to the equi- lateral foursided figure with pairs of unequal angles. the principal auxiliary lines of these figures are the diagonals. the subdivision generally leaves an oblong or hexagonal panel in the centre. the trapezium is a four-sided figure with unequal sides. the parallel trapezium has two parallel sides which are unequal and two equal sides which are not parallel (pl. , figs. to ). the sym- metrical trapezium has two pairs of adjacent equal sides (pl. , figs. and ). any other irregular four-sided rectilinear figure is a trapezoid. some suitable subdivisions are given on plate . definite directions for the trapezoid can scarcely be given; its sub- division is seldom easy, and varies with each particular case. the general principle is: — endeavour to cut-off projecting angles by means of triangles in such a way as to leave a portion of the entire figure regular or symmetrical. this is, however, a matter of artistic taste; and more easily learnt than taught. among other applications of the symmetrical or parallel tra- pezium is that to cupolas of domes: the lines are indeed curves on a bent surface; but this causes very little alteration in the sub- division. geometrical motives. re- º h - – = * * º - - plate . the oblong, and its subdivision. geometrical motives. - f the oblong, and its sibdivision. plate . geometrical motives. sº º geometrical motives. . * the oblong, and its subdivision. plate . the subdivisions of the rhombus, &c. — the circle, &c. – gothic tracery. plate . the rhombus, and the trapezium. – . subdivision of the rhombus. — . : ,, . parallel trapezium. – . *: ,, , symmetrical trapezium. the circle, its subdivision, and intersections. (plate .) the circle is often used in ornamentation as a fundamental form. no good result is produced (as a rule) by dividing it merely by radii or other straight lines; and it is therefore usually divided by ineans of curved lines or of a combination of arcs and straight lines. by describing circles to cut each other: motives may be obtained, as shown by figures and , the latter of which is the basis of a roman mosaic pavement found in pompeii (figure ). that circles which cut each-other form of themselves an effec- tive pattern—is shown by the engine-turned ornament, which is pro- duced by machinery and applied to the decoration of watch-cases, and to the plates from which bank notes, share certificates, &c. are printed. ornamentation by means of arcs plays a conspicuous part in gothic tracery, which will be treated-of in the following chapter. plate . the circle. – . different divisions and intersections. – . tracery in the gothic style. . centre of a mosaic pavament, pompeii, (kunsthandwerk). gothic tracery. (plate .) in the forms of tracery, the gothic style evolved and brought to perfection a characteristic decoration by means of arcs of circles. and although the results have something stiff and mechanical, when compared with the ornaments taken direct from nature in other styles, it cannot be denied that they possess a great originality, and richness of form. tracery was chiefly applied to stone, and wood; in architecture, and furniture; for galleries, windows, and panels, &c. well-known forms are the circles (figs. – of plate showing , , and foliations), the trefoil (plate , figs. and ), geometrical motives. plate . the circle, and its subdivision. geometrical motives. gothic tracery. — the ellipse. the quatrefoil (in the centre of fig. ), the cinquefoil, &c. the pro- jecting points are termed cusps, the voids between the cusps are termed foils. plate . tracery. – . gothic tracery, for panels and windows. the figures give partly the fundamental construction, partly the further deve- lopement. thus figures and , and , and , and , and , belong together. the ellipse. (plate .) the ellipse is a figure, whose radius of curvation is continually changing. it has the peculiar quality that, if any point on the circumference be joined with the two foci, the sum of the two con- necting lines is invariable, and always equal to the longitudinal axis. the three-centred arch is an approximate construction to an elliptic curve. it is composed of a number of arcs, which is not possible in the case of the ellipse. as regards beauty of line it can never be a substitute for the ellipse; but its easier construction has, notwithstanding, caused it to be used for many purposes. the expression “oval” for the ellipse, is erroneous. oval is derived from “ovum" (egg), and therefore means an egg-shape. the ellipse is of comparatively late appearance in art, the con- struction presupposing a certain knowledge of geometry, which was not possessed by primitive peoples. afterwards it became of common application, as will be seen from many passages of this handbook. the ellipse is a very popular shape for ceilings, panels, boxes, and dishes. figure affords hints as to the manner of subdividing it. plate . the ellipse, &c. — . construction by means of points. when the square with its diagonals and transversals is projec- ted as an oblong, the circle described in it becomes an ellipse. . construction from the foci. from the ends of the conjugate axis, describe circles with a radius of one half the transverse axis; the points where these circles cut each other will be the foci. now divide the trans- verse axis into two unequal parts, and from the foci as centres describe circles having these unequal parts for their radii; the points of intersection will be four points of the ellipse. another division will give another four points, and so on. . construction by means of tangents. construct an oblong with sides of the lengths of the transverse and conjugate axes respectively; draw the transversals, that is, geometrical motives. plate . the ellipse, and its subdivision. the ellipse. – . , the transverse and conjugate axes; join the ends of the axes in one of the quarters by a diagonal; and set-off a number of points on this diagonal. through these points draw straight lines from the opposite angle, and also parallels to the longitudinal axis. now join the points thus obtained on the outside of the quarters in the way shown in the figure; and transfer these lines to the remaining three quarters; and a series of tangents will be obtained, within which the ellipse can be drawn by hand. constructions by means of two circles. with the centre of the ellipse as a centre describe two circles passing through the ends of the transverse and conjugate axes respectively; draw a number of diameters through two opposite quadrants; where these diameters cut the smaller circle, draw parallels to the longitudinal axis; and where they cut the greater circle, parallels to the transverse axis (or vice versa); the points of the parallels will then be points on the ellipse. the other points required may be obtained by producing the parallels into the remaining quadrants. this construction may be specially re- commended for practical use. practical construction on a larger scale (centres, garden-beds, &c.). mark the two foci by nails, posts, &c.; place round them a cord equal in length to the transverse axis plus the distance between the foci, and tied at both ends; stretch the cord tense, by means of a pencil, and let the latter run round the foci: the resulting figure will be an ellipse. several constructions for ellipsoids. in constructions – the length of the transverse axis has a definite, invariable proportion to that of the conjugate axis, so that when the one is given the other immediately follows. in constructions – the length of each axis is variable. the point of junction of two circles of different diameter must lie on the same straight line as the centres of the two circles. describe two circles each of which passes through the centre of the other. join the centres with the points of intersection of the circles: the straight lines so formed will mark-off the four arcs of which, as the figure shows, the ellipsoid is composed. the centre }. are marked by small dots. escribe two circles touching each other, and with the point of contact as centre, describe a third circle of the same diameter. these three circles cut each other in four points. join these to the external centres as shown on the figure; and the resulting four straight lines will again mark-off the four arcs which are then to be described from the points indicated by the small dots. construct two squares, having onc side in common, and in them describe the four diagonals; these will then mark-off the four arcs which must then be drawn from the points denoted by small dots. construct a rectangle with sides equal to the transverse and longitudinal axes respectively; draw the two transversals (the transverse and longitudinal axes) and join their ends in one of the quarters. cut-off from this line, beginning from the point of junction with the conjugate axis, the difference of half the trans- verse and half the conjugate axis; on the centre point of the re- maining piece draw a perpendicular and the three more similar lines: these four lines will then show the limits of the arcs which are then to be drawn from the points marked by small dots. the ellipse, &c. — the three-centred arch. • . – . . . . construct an oblong with sides equal to the transverse and longitudinal axes respectively, and draw the two transversals. measure the half of the transverse axis upon half the longitudinal axis, and ascertain the difference; halve this difference. this half difference must now be taken four times along the transverse axis trom the centre point of the ellipsoid, and three times along the longitudinal axis. the four required points will thus be ob- tained. the straight lines connecting them will give the points of junction of the arcs. construction from eight centres. construct an oblong whose sides are equal to the major and minor axes respectively; draw the transversals, and join their ends in one of the quarters. from the nearest angle, draw a perpen- dicular to this diagonal; the points where this perpendicular cuts the two axes will be two of the required centres. two more are obtained by symmetrical transference. from these four points describe circles with a radius = / (cb-da); the points where they cut each other internally will give four more centres. if the centres thus found be joined by means of straight lines, as shown on the figure, the latter will mark the points where the eight arcs will meet. construction of ovals or egg-shaped figures. the construction of such figures usually consists in combining a semi-circle with a semi-ellipse. draw in a circle two diameters at right angles to each other, and two intersecting chords of a quadrant; these when produced will determine the points where the various arcs meet. the centres of these latter lie on the ends of the diameters. the construction of the lower half is the same as in fig. . the centre of the upper lies in the intersection of tangents to the lower and upper circles. example of the subdivision and decoration of an ellipse, (storck's zeichenvorlagen). the three-centred arch. the three-centred arch, which was often used in the transition period between the gothic and the renascence, may be considered as a semi-ellipsoid; and it may be described by one of the methods shown on plate (see also the head-piece to this section, on page ). meyer, handbook of ornament. b. natural forms. a. the organisms of plants (flora of ornament). in nearly every style the plant-world has been used in patterns. leaves, sprays, flowers, and fruits, either singly or combined, have been adapted in ornament. the direct imitation of nature, retaining form and color as much as possible, leads to the naturalistic con- ception; the construction of an ornament according to the rules of rhythm and symmetry, with a stricter observance of regularity —is known as the artificial method. the selection of the comparatively few plants from the luxuriant field of the plant-world was partly determined by beauty of form (the outline of the leaf, the delicacy of the spray, &c.) and partly by the fact that they possess (or did at some time possess) a symbolic meaning. the plates which illustrate this section will first exhibit the akanthos; and then such plant-forms as are less used or only found in certain styles. they will first be presented as they exist in nature; and then as they were modified in the various styles. the akanthos leaf. (plates – .) of all the ornamental designs which have been borrowed from plants; the akanthos is the most popular. since its introduction by the greeks, it recurs again and again in every western style. a symbolical significance has never attached to the akanthos; its frequent the akanthos leaf, &c. and varied application is due to the ornamental possibilities and beautiful serration of its leaves. it grows wild in the south of europe, but in more northern latitudes is only found in our botanical gardens. there are many varieties of the plant, of which we may mention the following: akanthos mollis, with broad, blunt tips to the leaves; akanthos spinosus, with pointed lobes terminating in spines, and comparatively narrow leaves. the conception and treat- ment of the margin and shape of the leaf, is the principal characteristic of the different styles. the greek foliage has pointed leaf-edges; in the roman style, the tips of the leaves become rounder, broader, to some extent with more vigorous curves; the byzantine and roma- nesque styles, again, return to stiffer, less delicate forms. the gothic style, which used the foreign akanthos in addition to a number of native plants, adopted in the early period, round, bulbous forms; later gothic, on the contrary, preferred bizarre, long-extended, thistle-like foliage: in both cases the general conception is more or less naturalistic, but the details are usually idealised beyond recognition. the renascence, which revived antique ornament, developed the akanthos, and parti- cularly the tendril, to the highest degree of perfection; in the follow- ing styles formalism degenerates in this direction. modern ornamental art seeks its models in almost every style; and its creations have generally no pronounced, specifically modern character. plate . the akanthos, and artificial leaf. . leaf of akanthos mollis, (jacobsthal). . akanthos calyx, the leaves and flower of akanthos mollis, natura- listically treated, (jacobsthal). leaf of akanthos mollis, (raguenet). leaf of akanthos spinosus, (gewerbehalle). cup, corona of a greek stele, (raguenet). overlap of leaf, roman candelabrum, vatican. greek leaf, displayed, (jacobsthal). roman leaf, capital of a column, pantheon, rome, the spoon. like roundings of the points of the leaves, as well as the deep incisions, are characteristic; and designed to look well at a distance. i plate . the artificial leaf. . leaf, roman capital, (raguenet). . leaf displayed, as it is often used on roman reliefs, e. g.: so- mewhat more richly developed, on the so called florentine pilaster, uffizi, florence, (jacobsthal). byzantine leaf, sta. sofia, constantinople, (raguenet). romanesque leaf, st. denis, (lièvre). ; * natural forms. plate . the akanthos leaf, and the artificial leaf. natural forms. the artificial leaf. plate . the artificial leaf. — artificial foliage. . romanesque leaf, monastery of st. trophimus, arles, xii. century (raguenet). . gothic leaf, (lièvre). plate . the artificial leaf. leaf, french renascence, st. eustache, paris. leaf, style of louis xvi, (raguenet). leaf, french renascence, church, epernay, (lièvre). leaf, french renascence, (gropius). modern leaf, louvre, paris, (f. a. m. cours d'ornement). modern leaf, theatre, monte carlo, monaco, (raguenet). i artificial follage. (plates – ) the scroll is a purely artistic invention, the natural plant having no tendrils. flowers and calices, such as frequently occur in artificial foliage, are usually developed with serrated edges, composed to recall natural models, (comp. plate , figs. und ). artificial foliage is often combined with forms from plants, e. g.: laurel, oak, ivy, ears of wheat, &c., (comp. plate , figs. and ). what was said above of the akanthos leaf, holds good here too, for the differences of exe- cution in the various styles. the greatest luxuriance and the highest elegance were attained by the italian renascence, (comp. plate , fig. ). it is characteristic of the louis xvi. epoch that the lines which form the scroll are somestimes flattened, and, so to speak, make elliptic spirals, (comp. plate , fig. ). plate . artificial foliage. . ornament, summit of the monument of lysikrates, athens. . cup, roman. . roman ornament, the so called “medicean pilaster”, (artificial fo- liage of a large size). . fragment of a greek relief, (f. a. m., cours d'ornement). plate . artificial follage. . roman ornament, marble biga, from the style of the ornament it must have been an imitation of an original in bronze. . roman ornament, from the so called “florentine pilaster", a richly decorated marble relief in the uffizi, florence, (jacobsthal). romanesque frieze, st. denis, (lièvre). early gothic, notre dame, paris, (lièvre). renascence ornament, relief on the tomb of hieronimo basso, sta. maria del popolo, rome, by sansovino, (gropius). : natural forms. | º |º all. º | - -- ~ - º plate . artificial foliage. natural forms. fº º º - º - º k }. % . º Šºš Ç % º / . Ǻ sº * artificial foliage. plate . natural forms. plate . artificial foliage. artificial foliage. — the laurel, the olive, and the wine. plate . artificial follage. — . details from a relief on the lectern, cathedral, limoges, (lièvre). . ornament, louis xvi. style, (f. a. m., cours d'ornement). . modern french ornament, (f. a. m.). the laurel, and the olive. (plates , .) the laurel and the olive owe their introduction into ornamen- tation to their symbolical significance. both played a conspicuous part in the tree worship of the ancient greeks. the laurel was sacred to apollo. it was the symbol of atonement; singers and con- quering heroes were crowned with it; and in a similar sense it is still used as a symbol of glory. the olive was sacred to athene; olive branches were the prize of victory et the olympian games. in rome the victorious, laurel- crowned heroes were met on their return home by slaves bearing wreaths of olive boughs. the olive branch is the symbol of peace. plate . the laurel, &c. from nature. . laurel (laurus nobilis). evergreen; blossoms yellowish white; fruit ball or egg shaped, blue black. - . olive (olea europea). evergreen; blossoms small, white; fruit oval, greenish, or black. plate . the laurel., &c. — . branches, greek vase, conventional painting, (owen jones). . branches, beaker, in the silver treasure, hildesheim, roman, original of chased silver, museum, berlin. fragment, roman marble relief. branch, intarsia panel, palazzo ducale, mantua, (meurer). branch, spanrail, louis xvi. style, (lièvre). band, french renascence. : the wine. (plates , .) although the wine does not occur frequently, it is not an un- popular element of artistic decoration. the antique and medieval styles, in particular, show a certain preference for the vine. in antiquity the wine (vitis vinifera) is the attribute of bac- chus. wine leaves and ivy, sometimes in connection with laurel, encircle the brows of bacchantes, and adorn their drinking-vessels and utensils, the thyrsus, kantharos, &c. - natural forms. plate . the laurel, and the olive. natural forms. plate . the laurel, the bay, and the olive. natural forms. plate . the vine: natural. natural forms. . the wine: artificial. plate . the wine, the lotus, the papyrus, and the palin. the ecclesiastical art of the middle ages adopted the vine, toge. ther with ears of corn, as the symbol of christ. later styles, and modern art, have adopted the wine in both the antique and medieval senses. plate . the wine. . natural branch. plate . the wine. scroll ornament, roman relief. roman ornament, vertical border. . early gothic ornament, notre dame, paris, (lièvre). renascence ornament, italian pilaster. . renascence ornament, frieze, venice, th century, (grüner). : the lotus, the papyrus, and the palm. (plate ) the lotus and the papyrus are plants of ancient oriental civi- lisation; and play an important part in the social life of the egyptians, hindoos, assyrians, and other nations. the dried stalks of these water plants were used as fuel, or made into mats and other plaited arti- cles; their roots served as food; the pith as wicks for lamps. the paper of the ancients was made of papyrus. this explain sits appear- ance in the ornamental art of these nations, and its special luxuriance, in egyptian style. spoons and other utensils were decorated with lotus flowers and calices; the capitals of columns imitate the flowers or buds of the lotus: the shaft resemples a bound group of stalks; the base reminds us of the root leaves of these water plants; their mural painting shows lotus and papyrus motives in the most comprehensive manner. the lotus was sacred to osiris and isis, and was the sym- bol of the recurring fertilisation of the land by the nile, and, in a higher sense, of immortality. the palm, of which a few varieties exist in the east and south of europe, is also used in ornamental art. palm leaves or branches were used at the entry of kings into jerusalem, at the feasts of osiris in egypt, at the olympian games in greece, and in the triumphal pro- cessions of ancient rome. they were the symbol of victory and of peace. in this latter sense they have been received into the ritual of the christian church. the late renascence and following styles down to the present day have made a decorative use of palm leaves. the symbolic significance in a higher sense, as the token of eternal peace, has secured for the palm leaf a place in modern art on tombs and similar monuments. the decorative effect, of dried palm fronds natural forms. meyer, handbook of ornament. natural forms. the ivy: natural, and artifical. plate . the lotus, the papyrus, and the palm. – the ivy. along with tufts of grasses and the like, has brought them into fashion as a finish to the artistic adornment of rooms. plate . the lotus, &c., from nature. . lotus flower (nymphaea nelumbo — indian water lily). and . lower end and half-opened bud of the papyrus plant (cy- perus papyrus l. — papyrus antiquorum willd). . idealised lotus and papyrus, egyptian mural painting, (owen jones). . frond of an areca palm (areca rubra — in asia as a tree, the so called pinang). the species chamaedorea and phoenix have similar fronds. . leaf of a fan palm (corypha australis). the species latania, chamaerops, borassus, &c., have a leaf of similar shape. - the ivy. (plate .) the ivy (hedera helia) is indigenous to the east, north africa, south and central europe, and england. it is an evergreen climbing shrub which develops into a tree under favourable circumstances. in ancient times it was sacred to bacchus. beakers for filtering wine were made of ivy wood. as an attribute of bacchus it is found twined round the thyrsus which the bacchantes flourished in their hands in processions and dances. the ivy is a common decorative ornament on ancient vases. it was also the symbol of friendship, especially of the weaker with the stronger. ivy leaves are of very various shapes. usually broad and five-lobed, they appear at the ends of young shoots in long pointed, lance-like forms. flowering twigs have leaves without indentations, heart-shaped, with elliptic or oval tapering. the latter forms in particular were adopted by antique art. plate . the ivy. - . spray with broad-lobed leaves, from nature. . spray with elliptic tapering leaves, after blooming, from nature. . spray with lanceolate leaves, from nature. . decoration of the neck of a greek hydria, campana collection, (l'art pour tous). upper part of a pilaster like-panel, antique. . fragment of decoration, roman column, vatican, rome. : * the corn, &c. – warious leaves. the corn, the hop, the convolvulus, and the bryony. (plates , .) seeing how important agriculture has been in all ages, it was impossible that decorative art should neglect the ears of wheat, although their comparatively scanty ornamental possibilities prevented any very extensive application. combined with other motives, ears of corn have been made use of in various styles. in ecclesiastical art they have a symbolical significance (see what was said of the wine). the hop (humulus lupulus) is a well known indigenous plant of civilisation, and also occurs wild in marshy woods. its picturesque qualities indicate it as well adapted for ornamental use. in combina- tion with ears of barley, it is applied in modern art to the decoration of beer-mugs, the walls of inns, &c. the convolvulus (convolvulus), an indigenous climbing plant of ornamental appearance, is frequently used in modern art. the bryony (bryonia) has delicate tendrils and beautifully in- dented leaves, which afford a fertile motive, so that it is astonishing that this, and other allied plants have hitherto found comparatively little favor in decorative art. plate . the corn, &c. ears of oats (avena sativa). ears of rye (secale cereale). ears of wheat (triticum vulgare). ears of spelt (triticum spelta). ears of the common barley (hordeum distichum). . ears of the battledore barley (hordeum zeokriton). . field convonvulus (convolvulus arvensis) with red flowers. the hedge convolvulus (convolvulus sepium) has a similar habit and white flowers. (the group has been sketched freely from a cast from nature, by bofinger of stuttgart.) i plate . the hop, &c. hops and bryony (drawn from pressed plants). warious leaves. (plate .) plate presents a series of various leaves, whose general orna- mental possibilities have either secured or deserve to secure for them a place in art. the oak, the king of our indigenous trees, the symbol of power natural forms. the corn, and the convolvulus. plate . natural forms. plate . the hop, and the bryony. various leaves, and flowers. and strength, in antiquity the tree of jupiter, has from time to time been used in every western style. oak foliage, and perhaps almost as frequently the leaves of the maple, are often used in early gothic, where we meet them on friezes, cornices, and columns. the fre- quent recurrence of oak leaves, in certain works of the italian rena- scence, is due to the fact that the oak was the crest of the family of della rovere (rovere = winter oak; two members of which family ascended the papal chair, as sixtus iv. and julius ii). oak, someti- mes alternating with laurel, is a usual ornament of medals and coins. plate . oak leaves, &c. leaf of the winter oak (quercus sessiliflora). . spray of the bitter oak (quercus cerris). . leaf of the maple (acer campestre). . spray of the sugar maple (acer plantanoides). leaf of a species of ranunculus. leaf of the oriental amber tree (liquidamber orientale). leaf of the american amber tree (liquidamber styraciflua). (this tree furnishes the storax or styrax, a kind of resin.) leaf of the tulip tree (liriodendron tulipifera). leaf of the climbing mikania (mikania scandens). . leaf of the liverwort (hepatica triloba). i : warious flowers. (plates , .) it need scarcely be said that flowers, these most beautiful pro- ducts of the plant world, have in all ages been exceedingly popular in ornamental art. in flat as well as in relief ornament they are used in the most manifold forms, as bouquets, garlands, wreaths, &c. flower-painting for decorative purposes (fans, tapestry, &c.) has de- veloped into a distinct branch of art. flowers, with their natural developement from a centre, are the most obvious models for the for- mation of rosettes (rosette = little rose). the rosettes on the well- known sarcophagus of scipio, the rosette bosses on the doors of the antique and the italian renascence, are striking examples of this. the realm of flowers is so extensive that we must confine our- selves to a few examples. plate gives a variety of single flowers (drawn from casts from nature by j. g. bofinger of stuttgart): plate shows a bou- quet of flowers. plate . various flowers. . alpine rose (rhododendron). natural forms. various flowers. plate . natural forms. plate . various flowers various flowers. — the festoon. chrysanthemum. white lily (lilium candidum). hellebore (helleborus). wild rose (rosa canina). blue-bell (campanula). wild rose, seen from the back. i plate . various flowers. bouquet, carving, louis xvi. style, (f. a. m., cours d'ornement). the fruit festoon. (plates – ) fruit, tied in a bunch with leaves and flowers, was a popular decorative motive of the roman, renascence, and later styles. we may mention the hanging clusters as a decoration of pilaster and similar panels; and the clusters hanging in a curve and known as festoons. in these cases: flowing ribbons fill up the empty spaces. the plates give examples of both kinds. festoons of fruits hanging in deep curves between rosettes, can- delabra, skulls of animals, &c., are common in the roman style. the origin of this style of decoration is to be sought in the circumstance that festoons of real fruit were hung as a decoration on the friezes of the temples, alternating with the real skulls of slaughtered sacri- ficial animals, in connection with the candelabra, tripods, and other sacrificial instruments. this style of decoration was then transferred from sacred to secular architecture, revived by the renascence in more or less altered forms, and has remained in use to the present time. in the roman style the empty space above the centre of the curve is often filled by rosettes, masks, and figures. these features were usually replaced by heads of angels on the ecclesiatical buildings and tombs of the italian renascence. plate . the fruit festoon. . cluster, libreria, cathedral, siena, italian renascence. . cluster, tomb of louis xii. st. denis, french renascence. . cluster, modern. . festoon, tomb of cardinal della rovere, st. maria del popolo, rome, italian renascence. plate . the fruit festoon. . festoon, between skulls, roman. . festoon, roman mortuary tablet, vatican. natural forms. plate . the fruit festoon. natural forms. the fruit festoon. plate . natural forms. plate . the leaf, and flower festoon. the festoon. – animal organisms. plate . the leaf festoon, &c. . festoon between skulls, roman. . festoon, tomb of beatrice and lavinia ponzetti, sta. maria della pace, rome, renascence, by baldassare peruzzi. . festoon, louis xvi. style. . festoon, modern, paris, (raguenet). b. animal organisms (the fauna of ornament). by the side of the flora, stand the fauna of ornament. the use of animals, in natural or idealised forms, is considerable; but, compared with that of plant-forms, it is less extensive. the reason of this is obvious: that greater difficulties stood in the way of the adaptation of animal forms than in the use of plant motives. the absence of animals in the mahometan styles is due to religious maxims which forbade or limited the use of representations of living beings. following the same direction as was taken in the flora, we shall find that the principal representations from the fauna are not, as might be supposed, those of domestic animals such as the horse, the dog and the like, but that the selection was guided first by the sym- bolic character, and next by the ornamental possibilities of each. if we disregard the more adcidental naturalistic use of animals, such as enliven scroll ornaments in the shape of butterflies, birds, reptiles, and other animals, and confine our attention to those inde- pendent forms of animal ornament which have become typical; they will be found to diminish to a comparatively small number, the most important of which will here be treated in detail. of the mammalia we have first to mention the lion, tiger and panther, the ox, the horse, and the goat; the delphin also finds a place. the eagle is the only bird which has been generally used. then come the fantastic forms of fabulous animals: the griffin, the double headed eagle, &c. the lion. (plates – ) the lion (felis leo) holds the first rank in ornamental fauna. his strength, bis courage, and his nobility, have assured him from the earliest times the title of “king of beasts". his majestic stature, his compact, proportionate build, his striking muscles, offer grateful pro- blems to art. lying, walking, sitting, fighting, conquering or con- quered, he is an often-used motive. lion scenes and lion hunts are common subjects on the palaces of the assyrian kings. characteristic, natural movements, and a the lion. distinctive rendering of the muscles, give these idealised representations a peculiar charm and a certain grandeur. the lion was used in the egyptian religion. the fact that the annual overflow of the nile, so fertilising and of such immense im- portance for the land, occurred at the time when the sun entered the sign of the lion, brought the animal into relation with water; and led to representations on pails and other vessels for water, &c. egyptian art usually idealises the lion till he is unrecognisable; it represents him at rest; and the simple, severe treatment of the mane (not unlike a stiff ruff) gives him somewhat of the appearance of the lioness, which does not posses one. among the greeks and romans the lion was considered as the guardian of springs, of gates, and temples; hence his appearance at fountains, on flights of steps, over gates, and on monuments. the sleeping lion is the symbol of the fallen hero. (the lion of the piraeus, the tomb of leonidas, and the tombs of halicarnassus, may be quoted as evidence.) in christian art: the symbolism of the lion is various: as the emblem of the redeemer (the lion of the tribe of judah), as the emblem of the evil principle and of the enemies of the church as well as of the devil himself (the enemy who goeth about as a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour), as the attribute of the evange- list st. mark, and of other saints. hence his frequent appearance on the vessels, and other articles of religious use, &c. in consequence of the crusades in the th century, he was in- troduced into heraldry, in which he became the most popular animal figure. as a heraldic creature he was severely idealised, (see division iii, under heraldry). in the renascence period, the lion is represented in all of the foregoing uses. in the rococo period, there was little skill, and little understan- ding, for the figure of the lion. modern art follows the example of the antique and the renas- cence; and thus it comes that in the present day the lion enjoys the lion's share in decoration. it is remarkable that in all ages, when representing the lion, ar- tists have given to his countenance something of a human type, by using the oval eye of man, instead of the round cat-like eye, (compare, plate , fig. ).” plates – show the lion in naturalistic treatment, and also the conventional treatments of the various epochs; plate is devo- ted to heraldic treatments. * an exhaustive article, entitled “der löwe in der kunst,” by const. uhde, will be found in the “gewerbehalle,” . pp. et seqq. natural forms. the lion. plate . meyer, handbook of ornament. natural forms. plate . the lion. natural forms. the lion. plate . * natural forms. plate . the lion. the lion. plate . the lion. . walking lion, from nature, (münchener bilderbogen). . egyptian lion, relief with sunken outlines, temple, dachel, (ra- guenet). . egyptian lion, capitol, rome, (raguenet). . assyrian lion, glazcd clay slabs, royal palace, khorsabad, th cen- tury b. c. . heads of slaughtered lions, assyrian bas-relief, british museum. plate . the lion. . lion supporting a shield (called “il marzocco"), by donatello, na- tional museum, florence, italian, th century. . lion, front of the louvre, paris, modern, by barye, (baldus, ra- guenet). . lion, tuileries, paris, modern, (baldus, raguenet). and . lion, in front of the palace of the cortes, madrid, mo- dern, (raguenet). . lion supporting a shield, modern, (raguenet). plate . the lion. . sleeping lion, monument to pope clement xiii., st. peter's, rome, by canova. - - . wounded lion, kriegerdenkmal, hannover, by professor volz, of carlsruhe. . head of the companion of the above. . walking lion, modern, french. plate . the lion. . lion, in pavement, town hall, lüneburg. . lion, shield of johann of heringen, register of the university of erfurt, , (heraldische meisterwerke). . lion, coat of arms, inlaid marble work, sta. croce, florence. italian renascence, (teirich, eingelegte marmorornamente). . lion, coat of arms, intarsia panel, sta. maria novella, florence, italian renascence, (meurer, flachornamente). . lion, tomb in wertheim, german, th century, by johann of trarbach. . lion supporting a shield, mural decoration, modern, (heral- dische meisterwerke). – . heraldic lions, albrecht dürer. - the griffin, &c. — the lion head. the griffin, and the chimaera. (plates and .) in addition to the imitations of natural animals there have been, from the earlist times, various fabulous monsters, which were composed of parts of several different animals. centaurs, sphinxes, the assyrian human lions, lion and eagle men, combine the human and the animal body. the combination, of different animal-forms with one another, leads to monsters, the chief representatives of which are the griffin, and the chimaera. the griffin is the union of a lion's body with the head and wings of an eagle. the fore extremities may belong either to the lion or the eagle. as the lion with water, so the griffin is associated in antiquity with fire; hence his frequent appearance with candelabra on friezes, &c. in heraldry the griffin is the symbol of wisdom, and watchfulness. there are other combinations; e. g. the chimaera, the hippo. griff, the ichthyogriff, &c., which may be seen in pompejan decoration. plate . the griffin. . greek griffin, fragment, museum, naples. . roman griffin, fragment. . griffin, renascence. plate . the griffin, &c. . head of an assyrian eagle-headed personage, . head of an assyrian lion-headed personage, . roman chimaera, vatican. . sitting griffin, support of a seat, castle of gaillon, french renas- cence, (f. a. m., cours d'ornement). . winged lion, tomb of loys de breszé, rouen cathedral, – . winged lioness, as supporter, louvre, paris, modern, (baldus). sitting winged lioness, casa s. isidora, santiago, chili, modern, french, (raguenet). } british museum. º the lion head. (plates , .) the lion head has been still more extensively applied than the entire figure of the lion. it is found in countless examples: — as a gargoyle on the temples of the antique, as a spout on vessels, with a ring in the jaw as a handle and knocker on the doors of the por. tals of the middle ages and the renascence; and as a purely deco- rative element like bosses and rosettes. the antique created a natural forms. the griffin. plate . natural forms. plate . the griffin, &c. the lion head, &c. — the goat head, &c. remarkable form by the direct union of the lion head with one leg, to form the support of a table, (see division ii, supports, plates and ). plate . the lion head head, prospectus of dr. schubert's naturgeschichte. head, painting by paul meyerheim. . gargoyle, metapontum, greek, (gropius, archiv). . gargoyle, terracotta, athens, (gropius). . gargoyle, parthenon, athens. and . front and side view of an antique head, vatican. plate . the lion head. . door knocker, cathedral, mainz, romanesque. — . heads, in basrelief, by ghiberti, medallions inside the bronze doors, baptistry, florence, italian renascence, (gropius). . head, fountain of the 'sacristy, san lorenzo, florence, ita- lian renascence. . head, in medallion, italian renascence. . head, heidelberg castle, german renascence. gargoyle, opera house, paris, modern, french, architect garnier, (raguenet). . head, modern, french, architect garnier, (raguenet). . head, in profile, modern, french, by the sculptor cain of paris, (raguenet). . head, by liénard, modern, french. . head, by prof. volz, of carlsruhe. the lion head, goat head, &c. (plates , .) the tiger (felis tigris) and the panther (felis pardus) are sometimes found in antique works. amorini, bacchantes, and maenads, gambol about on them or drive in carriages drawn by these crea- tures; and decorate themselves and their utensils with their skins. panther and tiger heads, as well as the head of the lynx (felis lyma), find from time to time similar application to the lion head. ram heads are a favourite form of corner ornament for the cornices of altars, and tripods; or serve, like the skulls of oxen, as objects from which to hang festoons. the decorative use in both cases is connected with the use of the ram as a sacrificial animal, (com- pare p. ). instead of real animal heads we sometimes meet with fantastic forms which may be described as chimaera heads. natural forms. the lion head. plate . natural forms. the lion head. plate . heads of various animals. piate . the panther head, &c. and . front and side view of panther head, modern, french. and . front and side view of tiger head, from nature. and . front and side view of lynx head, antique gargoyle, vatican. plate . the ram head, &c. and . front and side view of chimaera head, corner of antique three-sided altar. . ram head, roman altar. . ditto. . ditto. and . front and side view of ram head, late renascence. heads of warious animals. (plate ) the horse (equus) offers certain difficulties in the way of artistic imitation. the legs, for example, are too thin for rendering in statues, except in metal. this circumstance presents less hin- drance to representations in bas-relief. as an isolated figure the horse seldom occurs; he is more frequent in groups forming teams of two, three, and more (biga, triga, quadriga), intended to be the crowning feature of monumental edifices (san marco, venice; brandenburger thor, altes museum, berlin; propylaea, munich) mostly along with the figure of the man who leads him (horse-tamers on the monte cavallo, rome) or rides him (statue of the condottiere bartolommeo colleoni , venice; the colossal statues in the burg- hof at vienna; the grosser kurfürst, the alter fritz, the battle scenes by kiss and wolff on the staircases of the museum at berlin). in bas-relief: the horse is, almost without exception, represented only in profile (hunting scenes from the ancient assyrian royal palaces, the frieze of the parthenon). in grottesque painting: he furnishes the fore parts of various monsters, the hinder parts being formed by fish tails, or in some other way. the use of the horse head as a medallion, on stables, riding-schools, prize-cups, and numerous objects connected with sport, is common in modern art. in heraldry: the horse occurs in a few cases (shield of stuttgart). in japan: the horse is symbolical; and is connected with the hours. still less adapted to ornamental purposes is the ox; and repre- sentations are therefore exceedingly rare. the same is true of the dog, the pig, the fox, the stag, the hare, &c., whose forms, either entire or as heads, are only used symbolically, on such objects as have some connection with hunting (hunting weapons, powder horns, targets). natural forms. the panther, head, &c. plate . natural forms. plate . the ram head, &c. natural forms. the horse head, &c. plate . heads of warious animals. – the eagle. plate . the horse head, &c. horse head, parthenon, athens. horse head, assyrian basrelief, british museum. – . antique horse head. horse head, modern, german. head of a hunting dog, head of a fox, head of a boar, head of an ox, by habenschadan, of münchen. the eagle. (plates – ) like the lion among quadrupeds, the eagle (aquila, falco fulvus) is the most important representative of the feathered tribes. his size and strength, his majestic flight, his keen vision, distinguish him above all other birds. he has been used in decorative art since the earliest times, e. g. in the persian, assyrian, and egyptian styles. with the greeks: he was the companion of zeus, whose thunder- bolts he keeps and guards; he carried off ganymede on his wings. the romans used him in the apotheoses of their emperors; and chose him for the standards of their legions. napoleon i., imitating roman caesarism, granted his armies the french eagle in . hence the frequent appearance of the eagle on trophies, and emblems of war. in ecclesiastical art: the eagle is the symbol of the evangelist s. john, whom he either accompanies, or symbolises independently. the eagle appears in heraldry at a very early period, about the time of charlemagne. next to the lion he is the most-used heraldic creature (e. g. the united states, germany, austria, prussia, and france under the second empire, all possess the eagle). his heraldic forms vary considerably from the natural one. blue excepted, he appears in all the tinctures. the double-headed eagle is a byzantine invention. the heraldic eagle is a highly ornamental figure, so that, from the middle ages up to the present time, he has been employed not only for heraldic, but also for purely decorative purposes: he is seen in manifold forms in intarsia, cut or etched in metal, cut in leather, embroidered, woven, and painted; on weapons and tools, furni- ture, ceilings, and walls, (see the heraldic treatment in division iii, heraldry). our figures show him, natural as well as idealised, in various positions and conceptions; plate shows his heraldic forms, (comp. plate ). the eagle. — the wing. plate . the eagle. young eagle, in a scutella (dish), roman. roman eagle, pedestal of trajan's column, rome, (raguenet). roman eagle, vatican, rome, (raguenet). roman eagle in an oak garland, bas-relief originally in trajan's forum, now in ss. apostoli, rome, (de wico, trenta tavole, &c.). . sitting eagle, modern, (gerlach, das gewerbemonogramm). : plate . the heraldic eagle. . romanesque eagle, germanisches museum, nuremberg. . eagle, gothic style, viollet-le-duc, (dictionnaire de l'architec- ture). . eagle, gothic style, oil painting, germanisches museum, nurem- berg. eagle, gothic style, by albrecht dürer, (hirth, formenschatz). . eagle, renascence, by albrecht dürer, (hirth). eagle, renascence, (hirth). eagle, renascence, by wenderlin dietterlin, (hirth). eagle, modern, german, (heraldische meisterwerke). i plate . the eagle. . eagle, as akroter, flora pavillion, louvre, paris, architect lefuel, (baldus). . eagle, in a laurel garland, modern, german, by rauch. . eagle, with olive branch, in medallion, louvre, paris, (baldus). . eagle, high relief, by rauch, on monument, berlin. . french eagle, modern, new opera house, paris, architect garnier, (raguenet). . flying eagle, from nature, (raguenet). . eagle, from nature. the wing. (plate .) as the small scale of the preceding plates does not admit of the details of the wing being fully shown; and as draughtsmen, as well as modellers, are often called-upon to design winged shapes (be- sides the eagle, angels, amorini, genii, grottesques, the caduceus of mercury, the symbolic wheel of the railroad, &c,. we have thought it advisable to add a plate showing the details of the wings on a somewhat larger scale. they are taken from nature; but will be found helpful for idealised renderings. plate . the wing. . wing of a duck. . wing of a wild goose. meyer, handbook of ornament. - natural forms. plate . the eagle. natural forms. the eagle. plate . * natural forms. the eagle. plate . natural forms. the wing. plate . the dolphin. the dolphin. (plates – ) the dolphin (delphinus delphis, french, dauphin) has enjoyed an unusual share of attention. this sea mammal, which has some- times been erroneously classed among the fishes, lives in the seas of the northern hemisphere, swarms round ships, swims in shoals, and is fond of sport. in ancient times the dolphin enjoyed, and enjoys even now in some parts, a kind of veneration which protects him from persecution. we meet him occasionally on antique coins, on graeco-italic terracottas, on pompeian mural paintings, on furniture and utensils, and in the architecture of the greeks and romans. guigo iv. of viennois ( ) took to himself the title of “dauphin", and the dolphin as crest. one of his successors, humbert ii., surrendered the dauphiny in to charles of valois, in exchange for a legacy and on the condition that the heir to the throne should always bear the title “dauphin"; which condition was faithfully kept. this is the explanation of the frequent appearance of the dolphin in french decoration; but its frequent appearance in italian decoration, is due to its artistic capabilities. the dolphin is often used in pilasters, panels, in intarsias, in ceilings and mural paintings, in enamel, in niello work, and in typographical ornaments. in modern styles the dolphin often masks the spouts of fountains. in symbolic representations he is the companion of nymphs, nereids, and tritons, and of arion, aphrodite, and neptune, with whose trident he is often combined in ornament. plate . the dolphin. . portion of frieze, graeco italic, campana collection, paris. . shield of the french kings, th century, (raguenet). . castle at blois, french renascence, (raguenet). . italian renascence, louvre, paris, (raguenet). - . head, from a relief, french, by clodion ( – ). . pair of dolphins, by schinkel, (vorbilder für fabrikanten und - handwerker). . head, as spout, by barbezat, paris, (raguenet). – . heads, as spouts, face and profile, (hauptmann, moderne orna- mentale werke im stile der italienischen renascence). plate . the dolphin. - - . frieze, sta. maria dell' anima, rome ( to ), italian, (raguenet). - . panel ornament, french renascence. . choir seats, certosa near pavia, italian renascence, (teirich, meurer). - natural forms. the dolphin. plate . natural forms. plate . the dolphin. - natural forms. the dolphin. plate . the dolphin. — the shell. — the serpent. . part of frieze, rome, arco della chiesa nuova, italian re- nascence, (weissbach und lottermoser, architektonische motive). – . heads. – . parts of address by german artists, to king humbert of italy, by director götz. plate . the dolphin. . panel, venetian renascence. . lower part of panel, ducal palace, venice, italian renascence. . part of frieze, sta. maria della pace, rome, by bramante, , italian. . part of majolica tile, sta. caterina, siena, italian renascence. . head, cathedral, limoges, french renascence. . handle of a vessel, pilaster, by benedetto da majano, italian re- imascence. . pen drawing, by lucas von leyden ( ). the shell. (plate .) among molluscs: the nautilus (nautilus pompilius) and various shells, principally of the family of the trochoidae, are placed on feet; and, elegantly mounted in metal, serve as drinking-vessels. the scallop shell is used as the top of cylindrical niches, as a waterbasin in the form of a shallow dish, and as a decorative back- ground for vases and busts. it was extensively employed for these purposes in the later renascence. plate . the shell. . nautilus, from nature. . snail (turbo marmoratus), from a renascence drinking-vessel. . exterior of the scallop (ostrea jacobaea — pecten jacobaeus), from nature. interior of the scallop, after jost amman, (hirth, formenschatz). scallop design, louis xvi. style, lower end of a panel. scallop design, by the sculptor lehr, of berlin. scallop design, for the decoration of a niche. : the serpent. (plate ) the serpent is occasionally used for symbolic and decorative purposes. it is developed ints an antique bracelet, and to a handle for vessels, a pair twine round the staff of mercury (the caduceus, natural forms. plate . the shell. natural forms. the serpent, &c. plate . the serpent. – human organism. comp. plate ), and a single one round the staff of esculapius. coiled in a circle with tail in mouth it is the symbol of eternity on tombs, it is used in mythology, and is an indispensable accompani- ment of the symbols of envy and dissension; and the hair of medusa is represented as composed of serpents (plate ). in ecclesiastical art: the serpent is the symbol of wickedness, sin, and temptation (the scene in paradise); it appears under the feet of the virgin mary with an apple in its mouth. in heraldry: it is represented devouring a child, on the shield of the visconti, of milano. plate . the serpent. . cast from life of a viper (vipera berus — pelias berus) with a lizard (lacerta viridis — lacerta agilis), by j. eberhard of heilbronn. cast from life of a viper, by j. eberhard of heilbronn. antique bracelet in the form of a viper, pompeii. the snake as the symbol of eternity, (gerlach, allegorien und embleme). : c. human organism. the human form has been, and is destined to be a favoured object of representation in art. the desire, to depict for contemporaries and to transmit to posterity, the great deeds of individuals and the epoch-making achievements and fate of whole races and nations, is universal among mankind; as also the attempt to reproduce the portraits of celebrated persons. even the supernatural powers, his gods, man represents in the form of men. the “lord of creation” can give to the beings he venerates no more ideal form than his own, which he holds to be the most developed”. the christian conception has arrived at the same result by the reverse process: “god created man in his own image.” virtues, vices, passions, sci- ences and arts, ages, seasons and hours, elements, rivers, countries, hemispheres, and many other things receive symbolic expression; and are pictorially rendered by human figures. and the human body is often represented, without any meaning, and solely (decoratively) * mortals, however, opine that the gods had an origin man-like; feel and have voices like men, like men have a bodily fashion oxen and lions, no doubt, if they had but hands and a chisel, pencils as well, to depict the figure divine, would do likewise: god for the horse were a horse, and god for the oxen were ox-like, each would think god like himself and give to his god his own .nhage. xenophanes of colophon. b. c. the human figure. — the mask. on account of its beauty of form. all these delineations, which fall within the domain of high art, lie beyond the scope of this work. we have only to deal with the human figure so far as it has been received into decoration: we have only to occupy ourselves with “conventionalised” man. this includes the applications of the human face, more or less true to nature or with arbitrary accessions; masks and caricatures; grottesques, those strange combinations of human with animal or plant elements; and also the applications of the upper half of the human body as the starting-point of ornament; half-lengths as commencements of ornaments; those mixtures of human and animal shapes in which the upper half falls to the share of man, e. g.: — sphinxes, centaurs, &c. the mask. (plate .) the mask, strictly so-called, is an artificial, hollow face, intended to be placed in front of, and to conceal the human countenance so as to make the wearer unrecognisable, or to characterize him in some special way. the use of the mask dates back to the popular harvest games of the earliest greek period. from these games the mask is believed to have been transferred to the ancient theatre, in which the actors all appeared masked. different classes of masks were recognised: tragic, comic, &c. definite types of masks were connected with de- finite characters and “persons". the mouth-openings of these masks were unnaturally large and shaped like a bell-mouth, so as to reinforce the voice of the speaker; in latin the mask is termed “persona" (from personare = to sound through). from theatrical, the masks passed to artistic use, e. g. in the mural paintings of theatres and secular edifices (pompeian decorations), on bacchic vessels and other utensils (various beakers in the silver treasure of hildesheim). the renascence and the following styles have at times used masks in decoration, altering and exaggerating the forms. in particular the mask is often used for the decoration of the keystones of door and window arches. we may also mention the beautiful, freely-treated heads of dying warriors by schlüter on the arsenal at berlin; and the masks in antique style on the new opera house in paris, by garnier. plate . the mask. . bacchus, graeco italic, fragment of a vessel or utensil. — . heads, goblet (hildesheim treasure), roman, berlin museum. . keystone, graeco italic, terracotta, campana collection. . part of frieze, graeco italic, campana collection. . silenus, handle of etruscan vessel. – . decoration, pompeii. the mask. — the grottesque mask. . satyr, italian renascence, by sansovino, over a festoon in sta. maria del popolo, rome. . dying warrior, by schlüter, berlin arsenal, . the grottesque mask. (plates – ) masks and caricatures pass into each other, so that it is diffi- cult to draw a strict line between them. the french language ex- presses this connection clearly, by using the related words “masque” and “mascaron.” under masks are usually classed the delineations of beautiful countenances, either true to nature or idealising it. caricatures are faces grinning, deformed, distorted by accessories, or terminating in foliage. the antique, which had no love whatever for the depicting of the ugly and bizarre, only used caricatures in its oldest periods, in the so-called archaic style. the middle ages frequently employed caricatures. the renascence and barocco styles, as well as our most modern, art, often apply caricatures to keystones, to consoles, as spouts and handles, on shields and cartouches, in capitals and panels, on the backs of chairs, and in general on carved furniture, on stove-tiles, &c. we possess a number of excellent caricatures from the hand of the youthful michelangelo, who treated this form with predilection, and with the breadth characteristic of his genius. plate . the grottesque mask. . etruscan, terracotta, campana collection, (f. a. m., cours d'ornement). . grottesque, italian renascence, venice. . grottesque, tomb of the cardinal. sforza, sta. maria del popolo, rome, italian renascence, by sansovino. . single grottesque, from frieze, italian renascence, by michel- angelo, san lorenzo, florence. . part of capital of pilaster, french renascence, tomb of louis xii, st. denis. – . modern french grottesques. plate . the grottesque mask. . carved bench, italian renascence, bargello, florence. — . female, metal shields, german renascence. . akroter, tribunal de commerce, paris. . grottesque, louvre, paris, (baldus). natural forms. the mask, &c. plate . natural forms. the grottesque mask. plate . meyer, handbook of ornament. natural forms. the grottesque mask. plate . natural forms. plate . the grottesque mask. the grottesque mask. — the medusa head. — the grottesque. . modern french, theatre de bellecour, lyons, architect chatron, (raguenet). . modern french, ministry of war, paris, architect bouchot, (raguenet). piate . the grottesque mask. grottesque, by michelangelo, italian renascence, (raguenet). . grottesque, castle of ecouen, french, , (raguenet). . german, th century, (lessing). . grottesque, german renascence, gemanisches museum, nuremberg. grottesque, pedestal of a column, tomb in pforzheim, german renascence, by hans von trarbach. from the spout of a can, german renascence. grottesque, escutcheon of a lock, german renascence. grottesque, modern panel, sculptor hauptmann. i i the medusa head. (plate .) unique among the masks is the head of medusa. medusa, in mythological tradition one of the three gorgons, whose head perseus cut-off, to present it to athene as an ornament for her shield. it is employed in ancient art as a decoration for breastplates and shields, on and above doors and gates, and on the ground of paterae and dishes. the expression is that of the rigidity of death; its look is meant to petrify; the hair is interlaced with serpents; serpents wind themselves in knots beneath her chin; and small wings are often added. the archaic art represented the gorgon as ugly, terrible, and disgusting; the later greek conception, under praxiteles, was of stern, grand, beauty, (the so called rondanine medusa in the glyptothek at munich). . in the modern and renascence styles, the head of medusa is only decorative; and it is seldom employed. plate . the medusa head. . the farnese dish (onyx patera), museum, naples, roman. centre of antique patera, roman. . medallion, probably modern, french. . tympanum, tuileries, paris, (baldus). . the grottesque. (plate .) grottesques (from grotto) are fantastic, often really ugly monsters, produced by the combination of human, animal, and plant organisms the grottesque. — the half-figure. in the freest and most arbitrary manner. squatting, winged female figures without arms; human bodies with fishtails, with endlessly long, winding necks, with extremities terminating in foliage, are types of this style of ornamentation. the origin of the grottesque must be sought in the decorative painting of the romans. pompeii offers copious material. various painters of the italian renascence, among them rafael, revived and used the antique grottesque painting (rafael's loggie), after the discovery of the grottesque painting in the thermae of titus at rome, (from these vaults or grottoes is derived the name grottesque). the grottesques are a striking example of the playful and artistic feeling of the ancients; and stand in great contrast to the coarse attempts at the comic to be found in medieval art. from decorative painting the grottesques passed to the plastic art of the renascence. the revival of italian decorative painting in modern art has led to the retention of these forms also. plate . the grottesque. . part of pilaster, italian renascence, by benedetto da majano. . part of pilaster, tomb of louis xii., st. denis, french re- ila scence. . part of pilaster, palazzo magnifico, siena, italian renascence, by barile. – . parts of ornamental columns, palazzo guadagni, florence, (schütz). . italian majolica pavement, siena, italian renascence, (l'art pour tous). . stall in san severino, naples, italian renascence, by barto- lommeo chiarini and bernadino torelli da brescia, (schütz). . stall, san agostino, perugia, italian renascence. the half-figure. (plates – .) from antique times up to the present day, half-figures have been popular as startings for ornaments. the upper part of the human body undergoes little variation from its natural forms. below the breast or the stomach, often defined by a girdle, there is developed a sort of inverted foliage-cup, from which the scroll orna- ment grows. half-figures are found not only in the flat and in bas- relief, but also in round plastic art, in this latter case as brackets for lamps, torchholders, doorknockers, &c. plate . the half-figure. — . panels, roman altar. . part of a roman relief. - - - - - natural forms. - - the medusa head. plate . natural forms. plate . the grottesque. natural forms. the half-figure. plate . natural forms. the half-figure. plate . the half-figure. — the sphinx, and the centaur. . socle of altar, cathedral of orvieto, italian renascence, (ge- werbehalle). . part of relief, italian renascence. plate . the half-figure. . bracket, , italian, south kensington museum, london, (arundel society, objects of art). . decoration on ceiling, castle of s. angelo, rome, italian re- nascence. . sketch, by polidore da caravaggio, th century, italian, louvre, paris. . centre of a relief, lectern, cathedral, limoges, french renascence. . from basrelief, by j. verchère, modern, french. the sphinx, and the centaur. (plate ) the sphinx is an imaginary combination of the human bust with the body of the lion. it was originally an egyptian invention. the colossal sphinx of memphis was begun under cheops; it is hewn from the living rock, partly supplemented by masonry, and is more than feet long. the bust is generally a woman's; but in some cases it is a ram head. the sphinx is the guardian of temples and tombs, in front of which it is frequently ranged in avenues. in the roman period: wings are added, probably through assyrian influence; and the crouching position is sometimes exchanged for the half-erect. the renascence uses sphinxes in painting (as double sphinx also, with a single head and double body), and in free shapes as fire dogs, &c. the barocco period adorns gardens and portals with crouching sphinxes, (the castle garden at schwetzingen contains a considerable number). centaurs are imaginary wild monsters, with the fore part of a man and the hinder part of a horse. among the greeks, the centaur ori- ginally symbolised the thessalian race of equestrian renown. mytho- logy recounts their struggles with the lapithae. later delineations, such as the mural paintings of pompeii, depict the centaurs less wild, tamed to the service of dionysos, and sporting with amorini and bacchantes. the decorative capabilities of these fantastic figures has ensured them renewed application in later styles; and they are some- times used in modern decoration. plate . the sphinx, and the centaur. . crouching sphinx, egyptian, louvre, paris, (raguenet). . crouching sphinx with ram head, egyptian, (raguenet). . lower corner of an antique candelabrum, roman. natural forms. the sphinx, and the centaur. plate . natural forms. plate . the cherub head, &c. miscellaneous heads. . sitting sphinx, modern, french, andiron, by the sculptor piat, (l'art pour tous). . crouching sphinx, modern. – . centaurs and bacchantes, mural paintings, pompeii, (cheſs d'oeuvre de l'art antique). miscellaneous heads. (plate .) angel-faces, winged, youthful heads, with a circular or disc-like halo, are first met-with in the byzantine style, as a result of the activity of ecclesiastical artists. in the early italian renascence, the rendering is charmingly naive (lucca della robbia may be specially mentioned); they adorn friezes and arches, fill medallions, and are found in borders. they occur often on tombs; and they are also much used in modern ecclesiastical decoration. the profiles of minerva, mars, apollo, frequently occur in me- dallions. the skull or death's head, the gruesome grinning relic of de- parted life, and emblem of decay and death, finds its place in the dances of death, at one time so popular; also on the shield of death (albrecht dürer), on monuments, tombs, &c. it is generally represented in front view, and often over two crossed bones. plate . the cherub head, &c. cherub, early italian renascence. cherub, candelabrum, certosa near pavia, italian renascence. frame, germanisches museum, nuremberg. column of the plague, vienna, barocco. modern, medallion, by prof. heer, carlsruhe. minerva, berlin museum, modern. minerva, modern. warrior, louvre, paris, (baldus). . mars, from lièvre, les arts decoratifs. . skull, from nattire. c artificial objects. besides geometrical elements, and those copied from organic nature: ornamental art avails itself of artificial objects, either alone or in combination with the two first-named classes. but this does not include the accidental use of all kinds of articles in symbolic work, and the still-life painting, but only the vessels, tools weapons, instruments, shields, knots, ribbons, &c., which are used as decora- tion, or blended with it. it is easy to understand how the vessels of religious rites passed into the decoration of religious edifices, temples, and churches. in the antique style: the altars, tripods, candelabra, sacrificial axes, sprinklers, &c.; in the christian styles: the symbol of the cross, marks of priestly dignity, the instruments of the passion, &c., decorate friezes, walls, and panels, (comp. plate , figs. and ). decorative groups of hunting and warlike. implements and of tools, &c., are termed trophies: the devices of guilds and companies are symbols. the following chapters will treat of these things in detail, along with other designs, of somewhat rarer occurrence, which also belong to this section. * the trophy. (plates and ) it was the custom of the greeks to hang on the trunks of trees, the weapons which the flying enemy had left behind on the the trophy. — the symbol. field of battle. these tokens of victory, or trophies, have also found a place in decoration. the romans erected artificial, symbolical trophies of stone or bronze in the form of columns, pyramids, and similar architectural structures. since their time trophies have been used not only to decorate all monuments connected with war and victory, e.g. arsenals, the offices of the ministry of war, guard-houses, barracks, and weapons, especially shields; but they have been used up to the present time for purely decorative purposes, as elegantly- arranged and prettily-grouped weapons of war, in the architecture of the pilasters of castles, town-halls and tombs, in the intarsias of the renascence, on woven fabrics and tapestries, as vignettes; and, above all, in plastic ornament. it was also natural that trophies should also be formed of hunt- ing-weapons, which have much similarity with weapons of war, and also of objects connected with the navy. the original meaning of the word (roozzatov = token of victory, from toozzi, turning, flight) has, it must be admitted, been lost sight of in these applications. plate . the trophy. — . decoration of chased metal dish, renascence. — . decoration of clock panel, french renascence, louis xiii style, (lièvre). – . panels of door, otto-heinrich portion of the castle, heidel- berg, german renascence, (pfnor). plate . the trophy. . panel, tomb of galeazzo pandono, san domenico maggiore, naples, italian renascence, (schütz). . part of panel, italian renascence. . part of panel of a stall, dordtrecht, dutch renascence. pedestal of monument to a margrave, pforzheim, by hans von trarbach, german renascence. – . panels, quay front, tuileries, paris, (baldus). . part of design for a monument, by j. ch. delafosse. the symbol. (plates – .) the grouping of tools and instruments, to symbolise some special idea, leads to the design of symbols. thus we find, disregarding those of war and hunting, which we have treated of as trophies, symbols of art, both of art in general and of the special arts: music, painting, sculpture, architecture, &c.; symbols of science, artificial objects. plate . the trophy. artificial objects. t the trophy. plate . meyer, handbook of ornament. the symbol. either as a whole or for individual sciences: mathematics, astronomy, chemistry, &c.; of commerce, of technical science, and finally of handicrafts and trades. singing, for example, is symbolised by a lyre with or without sheets of music: music by violins, flutes, horns, pan's pipes, &c.; dancing by the tambourine and castagnettes; acting by masks; paint- ing by brush and palette; sculpture by the hammer, chisel, and works of sculpture, busts, torsi; architecture by square, straight-edge and compasses, usually in combination with capitals. the railroad and steam are symbolised by a winged wheel, the telegraph by coils of wire, which radiate lightning. trade is represented by casks and bales of goods on which the caduceus (a staff round which winged serpents are twining — the attribute of mercury) is resting; agriculture has the plough, the sickle, the scythe, &c., wine culture the vine press. the different trades have chosen their symbols partly from their tools, partly from their finished products. the guilds and companies of past centuries introduced a certain system into these outward and visible signs; a large number of guild pictures, some of them very beautiful and ingenious, are preserved in the industrial art museums of modern times. a far more detailed and extensive treatment of symbols than can be given in the present work will be found in gerlach's allegorien und embleme, to which we are indebted for a number of illustrations. plate . the symbol. . angle ornament, hall of the ministry of state, louvre, paris, (baldus). louvre, paris, (baldus). - symbol of the violin makers' guild, klingenthal, , (gerlach, allegorien und embleme). – . pilaster panels, by the sculptor fomilini of florence, modern. – . medallions, by the sculptor lehr of berlin, modern. . . plate . the symbol. . carved wood door-head, french, th century, (l'art pour tous). — . symbols of sculpture and painting, by the sculptor hauptmann, dresden, modern. . part of exhibition-programme, münchen, , by r. seitz. . address-card of an ink factory, by prof. hammer of carlsruhe. . title to an edition of goethe's works, by dir. götz of carlsruhe. plate . the symbol. . part of panel, court of ducal palace, venice, italian renascence, (schütz). artificial objects. the symbol. plate . s* artificial objects. plate . the symbol. artificial objects. the symbol. plate . artificial objects. . plate . the symbol. artificial objects. the symbol. plate . the symbol. ecclesiastical art, architecture and sculpture, painting, in pilasters, by the sculptor antique art, hauptmann, modern, staircase of christian art, museum, dresden. art, . sculpture, i plate . the symbol. . banner, of the architectural school of the polytechnicum, carls- ruhe. chemistry. mathematics. mechanical engineering. civil engineering. forestry. post and commerce, polytechnicum at carlsruhe, designed by g. kachel. . mechanical engineering, . the mechanic, (gerlach, allegorien und embleme). . smithery, . navigation and commerce, tuileries, paris, (baldus). i plate . the symbol. - navigation, . agriculture, . music, . farming, – . war, border of a copper plate engraving, by heinrich goltzius ( — ). court front of the tuileries, paris, (baldus). . hunting and fishing, by stuck of munich, (gerlach, alle- gorien und embleme). . forestry, . sword-making, . musketry, (gerlach). . farriery, . smithery. the ribbon. (plates – .) ribbons are not used alone, but are frequently employed as a decoration of garlands and festoons (comp. plates , , ), of sym- bols (comp. plates – ), or they are labels to bear some motto (comp. plate ). the ribbons of the antique are simple, often ter. minating in a ball or acorn like knob; the middle ages, particularly artificial objects. the ribbon, and the label. plate . artificial objects. plate . the ribbon. artificial objects. miscellaneous objects. plate . the ribbon. — miscellaneous objects. the gothic, make them curled and quaint; in the renascence they are developed in various free and elegant styles, often divided at the ends like a pennon. in the louis xvi. style they are often peculiarly crinkled, but in spite of this mannerism they are not without a cer- tain decorative charm, (comp. plates and ). plate . the ribbon, and the label. . label for motto, on the seal of the town of schiltach, gothic, inscription on the scroll: “s. opidi schilttach”. . ribbon, from jost amman's wappen- und stammbuch, german renascence. . ribbon, painting by b. zeitblom, carlsruhe gallery, gothic. . label for motto, old germain painting, school of cologne, carls- ruhe gallery. . label for motto, triumphal car, by hans burgkmair, – , german, (hirth). . label for motto, albrecht dürer's “der eilen seyndt alle vögel neydig und gram," german renascence, (hirth). plate . the ribbon. . ribbon and knot, after daniel mignot, german renascence. . ribbon and knot, the louis xvi. style, (lièvre). . ribbon and knot for a bunch of fruit, after prof. sturm of vienna, (storck's zeichenvorlagen). . drapery festoon, (raguenet). miscellaneous objects. (plate ). finally, among the artificial objects which are used in decora- tion, especially of pilasters, we may mention those forms like cande- labra and vases, from which ornaments, like growing plants, usually rise, (comp. plates and ). cornucopias, torches, small inscription tablets, and many other objects, are introduced. plate . miscellaneous objects. . wase, window pilaster of the cancelleria, rome, by bramante. ita- lian renascence, (de wico). . vase, pilaster of a door, san angostino, rome, (de wico). wase, lower part of a panel, italian renascence. wase, tomb of louis xii., st. denis, french renascence. wase, louis xvi. style, (f. a. m., cours d'ornement). crossed torches, upper part of pilaster, by benedetto da majano, italian renascence. . crossed torches, renascence. i division ii. ornament applied to features. . bands. free ornaments, . supports. enclosed ornaments, or panels. repeating ornaments, or diapers. introduction. the second division of the handbook deals with ornament as applied in decorative features. they will be arranged according to their function, and treated in accordance with the mutual relations of the decorative form and its application. every one acquainted with decoration, must have been struck by the fact that on certain objects and on certain parts of them the decoration invariably appears to have been modelled on the same principle, no matter how much the selected motives may vary from each other or belong to special styles. in decoration, as elsewhere, there is a right and a wrong use for everything; each object, even the very smallest, requires its own proper form and decoration, and the artist who understands style will give these, though in many cases unconsciously; artistic instinct guiding one man where another must study laboriously. be this as it may, the relations are there. a socle ornament cannot be reversed and used as a frieze without modification; a column, which looks beautiful and even delicate on monumental archi- tecture, may produce a clumsy effect if reduced and applied to furni- ture; no one finds fault with the or flutings of it in archi- tecture, but half of them would more than suffice for the smaller cabinet. and so on. the achievements of those periods, in which the intimate connection between form, aim and material was either unknown or forgotten, are what might be expected. the empire style, which copied the antiqne at the instance of an august per- sonage; and, in so doing, produced work which is classical in respect of its mannerisms; is an example. a greek temple and an arm chair are two different things; each has its own peculiarities; and must be fashioned and decorated in accordance therewith. it were an insoluble problem to give a formula for each case; and to attempt to do so lies beyond the scope of this handbook. but we will attempt to bring together some important groups from the entire field; and by means of them to illustrate the principles of design. a. b a n d s. the group of bands includes all those ornamental forms which are used to give expression to the ideas of bordering, framing, and connecting. the motives are partly geometrical, partly organic, chiefly plant- forms; artificial forms being more rarely used. the band has no “up” or “down"; but only an onward or an outward tendency. it has no limitation in regard to length; but is generally a narrow, ribbon-like ornament. the proper application of bands is to the enclosing of ceilings, walls, floors, panels, on certain architectural constructions, on the abacus and the plinth of columns, and as a running ornament round the shaft of the latter. they are further used as the hem or border of garments, carpets and other textiles; as borders in typography, on the rims of plates or dishes, or to separate the ground from the rim, &c. the principal ornaments in this group are: the fret; chain and interlaced patterns (guilloche); foliated bands in the various forms of rosette, palmette, flower, leaf, and scroll bands, &c. the evolute spiral band (plate ) stands to a certain extent on the borderline between bands and free ornaments. leaf patterns, and the egg-and-tongue which has been devel- oped from them, are not bands at all, in the strict sense of the word. they express the mediation between the support and the weight, for which reason they are used as the enrichment of mouldings. they are here included among bands in order to avoid an independent group for the sake of the one plate. as a matter of fact, they do often appear as bands (the egg-and-tongue as a decoration of plates, medallions, &c). the fret band. the fret band. (plates – ) the greek fret (or meander border) is, as it name indicates, a specifically greek ornament, and no doubt of textile origin. its accomodation to the rectangular network suggests this. the name “meander" is said to be derived from a river of asia minor, the maeandros, now the menderes, which flows in sinuous curves. although the forerunners of the greek border are to be found in the assyrian and egyptian styles, it was greek vase-painting and architecture which gave rise to the variations of the pattern; architecture also employed it plastically. among other applications in the roman style it was used for mosaics on floors and often — contrary to the principles of style of flat ornaments — in those parallel perspective representations in which it seems as if it were a plastic ornament, (plate . ). the middle ages seldom used the fret (one example will be found on plate . ); but similar forms are common in the chinese and japanese styles (plate . ). the renascence revived the fret in its ancient application; made new combinations; and sometimes interlaced it with plant motives (plate . ). although very commonplace, the fret still has a good effect when it is applied in the proper manner. its construction is very simple. in general – although not always — the breadth of the broad lines or ornament is equal to the distance between them; we therefore draw a square network as shown on plate , fig. , then draw all the horizontal lines (the measure- ment of the lengths and the observance of the rhythmic regularity peculiar to each greek pattern are the only difficulties), and then join their ends by means of perpendiculars, (plates and ). centres are formed by arranging the axis at a suitable place, and reversing the pattern, (plate . and ). angle junctions may be similarly arranged by cutting the pattern diagonally to the square net at a suitable place, and reversing as before, (plate . , and ). the angle-treatment of current frets is more difficult (plate : figs. , , and ). the end of a fret with only one row may be formed by cutting the pattern short at a suitable spot; where two or more rows run parallel to or cross each other, they may be combined so as to form proper endings (plate . ). the pattern is sometimes carried round a circle; but this is an arrangement which is quite out of accordance with its character. the square network is not always applicable to cases in which the fret has to be repeated within a given length. in this case the divi- sions of length are either elongated or compressed by drawing the auxiliary lines at a greater or less angle than ° (this is shown on plates and ). the fret band. — the chain band. plate . unsymmetrical or current frets; greek vase paintings. – . ordinary, simple patterns. . elongated pattern. raking pattern. – . patterns which are interrupted by rosettes, stars, &c. – . abnormal pattern, formed by fragments, instead of a contin. nous line. plate . reciprocating frets. – . ordinary, simple patterns. . double pattern, greek. . intersecting pattern, louvre, paris. and . fragmentary pattern, greek, and modern. and . symmetrical double pattern, greek. – . ornamented patterns. plate . intersecting frets, &c. – . ordinary patterns, greek vase paintings. . abnormal pattern, japanese metal vessel. . pattern in parallel perspective, roman mosaic pavement. . mediaeval folded-tape pattern, resembling the fret, (racinet). . pattern ornamented with laurel, louvre, paris. plate . ends, angles, and centres, of frets. , and . free, unsymmetrical angle treatment. , , , and . symmetrical angles. and . centre treatments. — . ends of patterns. antique motives, except no. (chinese), and no. (modern). the chain band. (plate ) the basis of the design is the chain. the chain band is there- fore cemposed of circular, elliptical, square, or lozenge shaped links, which are either represented all in front view (as in , , and ), or alternately in profile (as in , , , and ). the chain pattern probably occurs sporadically in every style. that chain-bands have not been more frequently used, although they are a simple and effective mode of decoration, may be due to the fact that the chain appeared to a certain degree to be too force- ful, too vigorous in its effect. at any rate, delicacies of artistic feel- meyer, handbook of ornament bands. |e||flſ; tº . h = h plate . the fret band. bands. [f uef|| ||[fif]||[f]| || §: . [...] *b, . the fret band. plate . * bands. — plate . | - - - - - - - - - - - - - ) i l l l • • • • • • • • • +-+-+-+· . i t - №ſſae), | ()|()|| │ ├─|| || || №.Œ|| |||||||||||Ģ||Ķ|¤| [#||[ītā||||||||||tĒ||ĪĒ||Īſāeffeff#ftlË [e]]· · · · -, -,||ſ=}}Œ |ſ[ |||||||Ė|||-Éſ:ſī| | || .| –ſae, bands. the chain band. – the interlacement band. ing, which have found expression elsewhere, and often unconsciously, seem to point to this conclusion. the construction of such bands is simple; and in the case of those illustrated may be understood from the plate itself. plate . the chain. band. – . modern decorative painting. – . carved wooden ceiling, townhall, jever, german, renascence. the interlacement band. (plates – ) the interlacement band includes all those bands which are for- med of a number of lines interlaced or plaited together. they are usually symmetrical to the longitudinal axis; and may be produced indefinitely. the principle is that the interlacing broad lines shall pass over and under one-another alternately. rope patterns are used as borders in painting, in textiles, in pottery, intarsia, and the ornamentation of manuscripts; in architect- ure on the under sides of stays and beams, on archivolts (the arches of doors and windows), in the soffits of arches, sometimes in a frieze, and often as the enrichment of the torus moulding. interlacement patterns are used in all styles, though in some they are more popular than in others. and in this ornament the indivi- duality of each style is very strongly marked. in the antique: the ornament consist of wavy interlacing bands round regularly-placed knobs or eyes. the wavy lines are composed of arcs or of arcs and straight lines, in which latter case the arcs make tangential junctions with the straight lines (plate ). in flat ornament the interlacing lines are distinguished from each-other by shading or by colour; in plastic ornamentation they are fluted or channelled. the interlacement patterns of the middle ages — chiefly of the byzantine and romanesque periods — make use of antique forms; adding to them the angular bend (plate . – ). in the so called northern styles — celtic, anglo-saxon, norman, scandinavian, and old frankish: it is the most conspicuous ornament. here we meet extremely complicated and richly combined interlacings, mostly freely drawn, without the aid of the compasses. it is cha- racteristic, and remarkable in regard to these styles, that the same band appears in sections of different colours in their ornament. the works of owen jones and racinet contain numerous examples, mostly from old illuminated manuscripts: our plate ( – ) reproduces some of the simplest (reconstructed with the compasses). ` the interlacement band. the moorish style favours a peculiar interlacement. it is cha- racteristic that the bands, which are always straight, make angles of ° or , and are adapted to a network as shown on plate , fig. . here, too, we find the alternate colouring of the single bands. numerous examples will be found in owen jones, racinet, and prisse d'avennes, “l’art arabe”, a selection from these being given in plate , figs, – . the other oriental styles exhibit greater variety in this respect; and also employ round forms, (plate . und ). the renascence developed great variety. besides the traditional forms of the antique, peculiar constructions appear, chiefly to be met-with in the arts of inlaying, on book-cover decoration, in pewter chasing, and typographical borders, (plate ). modern art borrows from all styles; and, as was also the case in the middle ages and the renascence, intersperses its patterns with foliage, (plate ). plate . the interlacement band. – . ordinary antique patterns, single, double, and triple. – . elongated antique patterns, single, double, and triple. . antique pattern, doubly interlaced, with unequal waves. . antique pattern with two rows, terracotta painting. construction: first mark the centres of the eyes: in and these lie on the points of intersection of a triangular net; in and on those of a diagonal square net. the rest will be understood from the figure. plate . the interlacement band. . romanesque patterns, decoration of archivolt, segovia. . byzantine pattern, sta. sofia, constantinople. – . northern patterns, manuscript ornaments of the th and th century, (racinet) plate . the interlacement band. – . simple moorish patterns, alhambra, granada. . persian pattern, metal vessel, (racinet). . russian oriental pattern, (viollet le duc, “l’art russe"), plate . the interlacement band. – . patterns, wood and ivory inlaid work, italian renascence. . pattern, by domenico de fossi, of florence, th century, (raguenet). . intarsia pattern, sta. maria in organo, verona; in the original the interstices are enriched by plant sprays. bands. |× \<\ < >> z\><> xxz a [[ %rºž & neº r& z\ §º -> |- hº- s n plate . the interlacement band. bands. plate . the interlacement band. bands. plate . the interlacement band. bands. the interlacement band. plate . bands. t the interlacement band. plate . the interlacement band. — the rosette band. . title border of a mathematical work, printed in paris, oronce finé, , (hirth). - . soffit ornament, entrance of the otto heinrich building, hei- delberg, to , (musterornamente). plate . the interlacement band. – . angles of border, modern french, (raguenet). . edge of a nodern damask border, (gewerbehalle). – . modern borders, (bötticher, “ornamentenbuch"). . modern wood intarsia, (gewerbehalle). the rosette band. (plate ) the term “rosette band" is a general name for rosette, spray and other bands, when the rosette is the leading characteristic. the single rosettes, which are similar to conventional roses seen in front- view, are either in immediate juxtaposition (plate . and ), or divided by channels (plate . ), by calices (plate . , , ), or by stalks and sprays (plate . , , , ). the rosette bands are either current, that is, they have a definitive direction sideways; or they are entirely without direction, that is, they are symmetrical, not only from top to bottom but also from right to left. by allow- ing the rosettes to overlap we get a band more or less identical with the so called strung-coin, or “money-moulding", (plate . and ). rosette bands are especially common in the assyrian style, in antique vase painting, in the medieval enamels (cologne enamel), in the indian style, in the renascence, and in the modern styles. plate . the rosette band. . antique vase painting. . modern decorative pattern. antique bronze shield. and . antique patterns, after jacobsthal. . neck of a greek hydria. . latin evangeliarum, written by godescald for charlemagne, th century, (racinet). . enamel ornament, the great reliquary, aachen. (racinet). . indian enamel border, (prisse d'avennes). . indian carving, (owen jones). . intarsia border, sta. maria in organo, verona, , (muster- ornamente). . popular renascence pattern. . pattern, persepolis. . plastic border, louis xvi. style, (raguenet). bands. the rosette band. plate . bands. the palmette band. – the wertebrate band. the palmette band. (plate .) the palmette is a specifically greek kind of ornament. like the fin- gers of an outspread hand (palma, the palm of the hand) a group, odd in number, of narrow, entire leaves is combined into a symmet- rical ornament. the centre leaf is the largest; and the leaves diminish gradually as they approach the sides. the tips of the leaves lie on a regular curve. the lower ends of the leaves are disconnected, divi- ded from each other by slight intervals, and usually spring from a tongue-shaped leaf. the delicate sensitiveness of greek artistic feeling finds a striking expression in this ornament. it is applied in mani- fold ways, e. g.: as antefixes and akroters, as cornice-decoration (comp. the group of free ornaments), and as palmette borders. in rare cases the palmette ornaments are in juxtaposition without anything between them — this is usually the case on the lekythos (a greek vessel for oil, &c.) plate . — in the majority of cases the palm- ettes are connected or bordered by spiral bands (plate . . &c.). palmette ornaments are of frequent occurrence on greek vessels, and on the friezes of their architecture. where they occur in later styles: it is only sporadically; and the severe classical beauty is not retained. plate . the palmette band. . , and . paintings, greek, terracotta vessels. . and . greek, friezes. . intarsia, italian renascence. . modern, wrought iron trellis. the vertebrate band, &c. (plates – ) leaf bands are generally numerous in all styles; and as varied as are the modes of their application. the leaved stalk, with or without flowers, fruits, &c., is the simplest natural motive. the various plants are used as a basis, partly with, partly without, symbolical reference. the antique chiefly availed itself of the laurel, olive, and ivy; the middle ages used the vine, clover, thistle, and maple; the renascence shows the artificial leaf. to these traditional patterns: modern art has added some others which are specially adapted for naturalistic representation, such as the convolvulus, the passion-flower, the hop, &c. thus we find in the antique: a succession of buds (plate . ): straight stalks with leaves, either attached or free (plate . , ); or undulating stalks, with leaves, fruit, or flowers (plate . , , ). meyer, handbook of ornament. the wertebrate band, & the undulate band. the latter mode was retained in the medieval style; in the roman- esque style the stalks are more compressed, and the lobes of the leaves fully rounded (plate . , ); in the gothic style the former are thin and extended, the latter slit and pointed. extremely common are the two forms depicted on plate . and . characteristic of the late gothic is the example , plate ; this kind of ornament- ation is excellently adapted for simple wood-carving and stamped leather-work. the oriental conception, in textile fabrics and by the engraved and inlaid metal-work, is shown (plate . – ). intarsia technique, leather-stamping, weaving, and the ornamenta- tion of manuscripts offered the renascence opportunity to make use of, and to vary the floral border with advantage (plate ). inter- lacement and floral patterns are frequently combined in the same example (plate . and ). as examples of modern art, the naturalistic borders figured on plate . – . are given. when the main-stem runs longitudinally along the centre of the band, like the vertebral column in the skeletons of animals, then the arrangement is termed vertebrate. when the main-stem oscillates from side to side (as in plate . , , & ), then the arrangement is termed undulate. plate . the wertebrate band, &c. . – . paintings, greek, terracotta vessels. – . french, mural paintings, th century, (racinet). . glass window, cathedral, bourges, th century, (racinet). . medieval. . intarsia, sta. maria in organo, verona, . . modern, plate-border. plate . the undulate band. – . persian, metal vessels, (racinet). . indian. byzantine, glass mosaic, san marco, venice, (musterornamente). . portion of romanesque initial, th century, berlin museum. . romanesque, portal of cathedral, lucca, (musterornamente). . gothic flat carving, end of th century, (musterornamente). . medieval, mural painting, swedish church. . french, mural painting, th century, (racinet). . early gothic, french. . gothic, manuscript ornamentation. . late gothic, flat carving, th century, (musterornamente). bands. ph. the vertebrate band, &c. plate . , + bands. plate . the undulate band, &c. bands. the undulate band, &c. plato . bands. the undulate band, &c. plate . the undulate band. – the evolute-spiral band. plate . the undulate band, &c. – . leather stamping, th century, schwäbisch hall, (muster- ornamente). . terracotta frieze, castle of schalaburg, lower austria, (wiener bauhütte). . intarsia frieze, from the same castle. – . borders of robes, tombs in niederstetten and lensiedel, th century, (musterornamente). . renascence, manuscript ornament. – . german renascence, (hirth, formenschatz). . archivolt of door, otto-heinrich building heidelberg castle, german renascence. - . french, renascence. plate . the undulate band, &c. . border, picture by domenico zampieri, th century, (muster- ornamente). . border, half-columns, sta. trinità, florence, italian re nascence. . intarsia frieze, stalls, san domenico, bologna, italian re- inascence. . wrought-iron trellis of balcony, milan, (gewerbehalle). . frieze, italian renascence. . modern, (césar daly). . modern. – . laurel and oak borders, (gewerbehalle). – . modern borders, (gewerbehalle). the evolute-spiral band. (plate .) the wave of the sea has been suggested as the motive of this “wave" pattern; but its origin is purely geometrical. the line of the evolute-spiral pattern divides the surface of the border into two parts, which in flat ornament are coloured differently. in plastic work, for which the pattern is also suitable, the lower part projects. in wrought-iron-work: the curved line runs freely between two bars. this pattern is adapted for borders of robes, shields, and plates; for use on vessels, friezes, cornices, and tablets in architecture; and also as borders, for tapestries, and mural-paintings. a rosette is often placed at the volute-centres (plate . and ); the interstices between the lines are sometimes decorated with leaves and flower-buds (plate . – ). this occurs chiefly in the renascence period, when the antique seemed too simple. how the evolute-spiral band. – the enrichment of the bead moulding. far this may be carried, in some cases, in shown by fig. , in which the evolute-spiral line is nothing more than the skeleton of the orna- ment. the middle ages did not use this form at all. angles, and centres are arranged as shown on figs. – . this band is excellently adapted for the framing round circular panels. plate . the evolute-spiral. – . paintings, antique vessels. – . angles. . central junction. . pattern round a circular panel. . painting of a stove tile, german renascence, germanisches museum, nuremberg. . modern borders. . border, by sebastian serlio, th century. . frieze, otto-heinrich building of heidelberg castle. . wrought-iron trellis, temple of apollo in the garden of the castle at schwetzingen. . painting, palazzo ducale, mantua, italian renascence. the enrichment of the bead moulding. (plate .) bead, or astragal, is the name given to those small half-round mouldings, which are often enriched by ornaments like pearls, strung- together, &c., or as turned bands and cords. generally they are only used in plastic art, and as a rule not alone; but below the egg- and-leaf ornaments, and similar cornice profiles (plate ). they also occur as intermediate members between the shaft and the capital of columns. beads are enriched with balls, discs, or ovals, in rather more than half relief. the simplest bead-enrichment is formed of round pearls, either close together or permitting the representation of the thread to show between them. disc and oval enrichments are seldom used alone, but arranged alternately, as shown in figs. to . in addition to the simple examples of the antique, the renas- cence uses richer forms, the single members being again ornamented, profiled and more arbitrarily fashioned (plate . and ), or finished-off with small leaf calices (plate . and ). wood carving avails itself of strung discs seen in perpective (plate . ). the enrichments may also suggest torsion. after the moulding is made, it is set-out like a screw, as indicated by the auxiliary constructions in figs. – . leaves or pearls sometimes lie in the hollows and follow the thread of the screw (plate . ). bands. the evolute-spiral band. plate . mouldings. plate . the enrichment of the bead moulding. * * the enrichment of the astragal, the torus, and other mouldings. here also must be grouped those ribbons rolled spirally round rods, such as we find in the art of the middle ages and the re- nascence (fig. ). corners are generally covered with a small leaf. plate . the enrichment of the bead moulding. – . simple enrichments, antique. — . richer enrichments, renascence. – . beads enriched like twisted ropes. . spiral-ribbon enrichment, louvre, paris. the enrichment of the torus moulding. (plate .) torus is the name given to those larger mouldings of semi- circular or semi-elliptic section, such as are specially used in archi- tecture on the bases of columns and pilasters, on socles, on mediaeval door and window arches, and on the ceiling mouldings of the renascence and modern times. while the smaller beads are ornamented with pearls and twisted cords, these more important mouldings are dec- orated by enrichments which resemble a bundle of rods round which ribbons are twisted at suitable places (figs. and ); by surrounding them with plaited or net work (figs. , , ); by clothing them with foliage (figs. , , ); or by combining the various systems (figs. and ). in modern times the torus is enriched by bound clusters of fruit. water-leaves, artificial leaves with serrated margins, laurel, oak, ivy, &c. are most in use for the leaf ornaments. as in the case of fruit clusters: ribbons are twined spirally at suitable placed round the fruit or foliage (figs. , and ). all these examples are drawn by first marking-off the divisions on the profile, as indicated on the figures. plate . the enrichment of the torus moulding. – . modern. – . antique. – . antique, decorated with laurel and oak. . mediaeval. . mediaeval, decoration of an archivolt, gelnhausen, th century. temple of jupiter, rome. – . louvre, paris, french renascence, (baldus). the enrichment of other mouldings. (plate .) the egg-and-tongue enriches, in architecture, the ovolo moulding of capitals, and the lower members of cornices, &c. mouldings. the enrichment of the torus moulding. -- mouldings. the enrichment of the cyma, and ovolo mouldings. plate . the enrichment of mouldings. in these cases it harmonises the support and the weight; and has also a decorative purpose as a bordering member. the leaf enrichment may be explained in the following way: a row of leaves, growing upwards, supports the weight, and is bent outwards by its pressure (fig. ). if this only occurs partially, we have the doric form (fig. ). if the leaves are bent-down tow- ards their lower ends (fig. ), we obtain forms like the so-called “lesbian cymatium.” a false conception, which regarded the leaf-shape merely as a geometrical element, afterwards gave rise to the corrupt forms of the late greek and roman styles (figs. a, a, and b). if the simple waterleaf be replaced by more richly serrated ones like the artificial leaf, we obtain examples like fig. . figure shows the egg pattern, from which all the more or less misunderstood varieties have, in course of time, been derived. the dart-shaped intermediate leaves have often been developed into actual darts; and the eggs or curved surfaces of the leaves have also been covered with independent ornamentation, in complete defiance of their origin (figs. and ). the corner is treated, either by freely carrying the pattern over into a palmette anthemion (figs. and ), or by covering it with independent leaves. further details on the subject of this chapter will be found in bötticher's tektonik der hellenen. plate . the enrichment of the cyma and ovolo mouldings. and . drawings to illustrate the origin of the pattern. . graeco-doric, painted. . leaf, erechtheum, athens. and . corrupt leaf. (bötticher). . roman leaf, (jacobsthal). greek egg-and-tongue, erechtheum, athens. g campana egg-and-tongue, graeco-italic, campana collection. . colossal egg-and-leaf, temple of jupiter tonans, rome. . roman egg-and-dart, arles cathedral, (raguenet). – . renascence egg-and-dart, (raguenet). . modern egg-and-dart, (raguenet). b. free ornaments. those ornaments, which are applied to suggest the end or finish of an object, may be classed in a group which, following an ex- pression already introduced, are termed “free ornaments", the word “free” implying not a severely-enclosed band or panel, but a freely- treated edge-ornament. the edging may be arranged to grow in an upward, downward, or lateral direction; the character of the ornamentation will be depen- dent on these conditions. endings with an upward direction are most numerous; and as plants, with their natural, upward growth, are adapted for this purpose, foliated ornament is the usual decoration of akroters, antefixes, steles, ridges, and finials. crosses, knobs, rosettes, and pendants, are independant free- ornaments, which are generally geometrical in their treatment. in tassels and fringes, which form endings in a downward direction, the organic plant motive is, of course, excluded; while lace (woven, pillow, &c.) avails itself of both motives, either singly or combined. crockets are foliated excrescences which are popular in the gothic style as an ornament of the edges, and ribs of buildings. gargoyles (as are termed the rain-spouts which occur so fre- quently in the architecture of the middle ages and the renascence) are also free ornaments with a lateral direction; they have often the form of figures, less often those of decorated channels. the link border. the link border. (plates – ) link borders are so termed because the transversely-growing foliage is connected together by scrolls which serve this purpose, like the “links" of a chain. of this class are much decoration of cornices, crestings in architecture, and fringes in textile art. besides these, link borders, which may be enlarged at will, and have a de- finite direction upwards or downwards, are used in a similiar manner as borders as edgings for carpets, plates, and panels; as borders for walls, floors, and ceilings (in which case the edging almost invariably grows outwards); on the neck, body, and feet of vessels; and fre- quently in architectural friezes. palmette leaves, connected by circles or by links, are adapted for edgings. the typical form is found on antique vessels and friezes; its forerunner is seen in the connected lily and pomegranate of the assyrian style. the link-border is found in every subsequent style, both flat, and in relief. it is generally composed of identical details, symmetrically re- peated. unsymmetrical and naturalistic forms are rarer, (plate , ). plate . the link border. assyrian, painted bas-relief, khorsabad. external margin, greek kylix, (lau). greek hydria, (l'art pour tous). greek, cyma. mosaic ornament, san marco, venice, byzantine, (musterorna- mente). medieval, mural painting, swedish church, (racinet). old embroidery, eisleben, (vorbilder für fabrikanten und hand- werker). . painted, cathedral, brandenburg, (vorbilder für fabrikanten und handwerker). . illumination of a koran, tomb of the sultan el-ghury, th cen- tury, (prisse d'avennes). . majolica dish, germanisches museum, nuremberg. . majolica dish, th century, (kunsthandwerk). . modern, (gewerbehalle). : ; plate . the link border. . greek, carved frieze, erechtheum, athens. . roman, frieze, (fragments de l'architecture antique). . romanesque, frieze, th century, (musterornamente). the link border. — on mouldings. – the cresting. . arabic, mosque of the sultan hassan, cairo, th century. . italian renascence, marble frieze, tomb of the conte ugone, badia, florence, (weissbach und lottermoser). italian renascence, intarsia frieze, (meurer). . modern decoration, (kolb und högg, vorbilder für das orna- mentenzeichnen). ; the link border on mouldings. (plate .) the cyma in architecture is the topmost or concluding member of a cornice. it is frequently used as a gutter. the section is some- times a concave or convex quadrant, but in most cases consists of two arcs curving inwards and outwards respectively, (fig. ). the ornamentation was merely painted in the earlier periods; but afterwards received a plastic form. it is chiefly composed of palmette leaves, either unconnected (fig. and ) or connected (figs. , and ), with lily cups between. artificial leaves, pointing up- wards and lying close on the profile with calices or water-leaves peep- ing out between them (fig. ) are also used. the middle ages used both systems, especially the latter, with the latter, with the modifications required by the changed forms of the leaves, (figs. and ). both the renascence and modern art follow the tradition of the antique; but give the palmette ornament a richer form, (figs. – ). plate . the link-border enrichment of mouldings. – . antique, (bötticher). . roman altar. . graeco-italic terracotta ornament, (lièvre). . romanesque cornice, house, metz, th century, (raguenet). cornice, notre dame, paris, th century, (musterornamente). – . cornice, louvre, paris, french renascence. . marble frieze, tomb in sta. maria sopra minerva, rome, italian renascence. . modern, (arch. skizzenbuch). the cresting border. (plate .) crestings are intended to ornament the ridge or top of the roof. such ornaments have been especially popular in france from gothic meyer, handbook of ornament. free ornaments. the link border. . plate free ornaments. plate . the link border. + free ornaments. the cresting border. plate . the cresting. — the akroter, &c. times to the present day. they are mostly of perforated work, and the top has usually a varied mass-shape. the materials used are stone, lead, wrought-iron, and, in modern times, zinc. similar ornaments are also found as finals of entablatures and attics, as well as on the balaustrades of galleries. cresting ornaments appear on gothic altars, shrines, chim- neypieces, &c., and in cast-iron on our modern stoves, railings, &c. the antique made no use of this form, although similar forms occur, as, for example, on the entablature of the well-known monu- ment of lysikrates. on the other hand, we must mention those valence-like borders which are seen on the terracotta reliefs of the campana collection, represented on figs. and . in most cases, these latter ornaments, if reversed, may be used as crestings. plate . the cresting border . gothic, (jacobsthal). . modern gothic, cast-iron. - . modern french, castle of pierrefonds, restored by viollet-le- duc, (raguenet). . modern french, cour de cassation, paris, (raguenet). - . modern german, by gropius of berlin, (arch. skizzenbuch). – . graeco-italic borders, downward growth. the akroter, &c. (plates – .) the akroter is the feature which serves as on ornamental finish to the apex of a gable. antique temples bear this decoration in a great variety of materials: stone, terracotta, painted, plastic, and cast in metal. groups of figures, griffins, &c., were sometimes used for this purpose; but the usual features were slabs of marble, bearing a palmette ornament, the central decoration of which is sometimes a mask, (plate . ). smaller ornaments of a similar kind are found ranged along the lower roof line, in front of the imbrices; and these are termed antefixes. the middle ages and the renascence make no general use of the antefix, but it occurs on modern monumental buildings in the antique style. - - the corner akroter which isusually found at the lower ends of the gable lines, consists of half the motive of the central one, (plate . ). plate . the akroter, and the antefix. . greek akroter, painted, temple of wingless victory, athens. . greek akroter, painted, acropolis, athens. the akroter. — the stele crest. . greek antefix, parthenon, athens. . greek sepulchral stele-crest, in the form of an akroter. . graeco-italic akroter, terracotta, museum, perugia. – . front and side view of a corner akroter, (bötticher). plate . the arroter, &c. . greek antefix, propylaea, athens, (raguenet). . roman antefix, temple of jupiter stator, rome. . modern french antefix, théâtre des celestines, lyons, archi- tect renaud, (raguenet). . modern french akroter, house in paris, architect renaud, (raguenet). - - . modern french akroter, orléans railway station, paris, archi- tect renaud, (raguenet). – . akroter and corner-akroter, fountain in the certosa near flo- rence, italian renascence. - the stele crest. (plate .) the stele is the greek tomb-stone. it usually takes the form of an upright tablet, sometimes tapering towards the top; and bears an inscription. it is sometimes decorated with rosettes, garlands and figures. at the top is a plain cornice, on which an ornament, similar to the akroter, forms the crowning finish. although the akroter and the stele-crest often have a perfectly identical form (plate . shows a crest which might just as well have been an antefix), still the style of the crest is as a rule more severe; and it is characteristic of a great number of steles that they have not the striking palm- ette centre, which the akroter always possesses, (figs. and ). very often, too, the crest is so designed that the sides are extended, to make a larger feature, (figs. and ). these monuments, dedicated to the memory of the dead, show better than almost anything else the special individuality and beauty of greek ornament. - plate . the stele-crest. - . stele-crest, (stuart and revett, wulliamy, jacobsthal). . p n (jacobsthal). . n n (“l'art pour tous"). . n n (lièvre). free ornaments. plate . the akroter, and the antefix. free ornaments. plate . the akroter, &c. free ornaments. ntnhx tpath the stele crest. plate . the perforated c free ornaments. the cross. plate . free ornaments. plate . the cross. the cross. – the finial. of form on utensils and wessels, on robes and garments, on carpets and banners dedicated to religious uses; in heraldry, and as a free ornament to form the upper ornamental finial of architecture. in christian architecture: the cross is used as a finial on steeples and gables, on tombs, pulpits, &c. often it is employed alone, as a monument, (tomb, wayside and votive crosses). plate . the cross: in stone. . modern french, charterhouse glandier, (raguenet). . modern. . modern french, with the monogram of christ, genouilleux, (ra- guenet). . gable of a church, st. urban's, unterlimburg, schwäbisch-hall. . tomb, churchyard, baret, th century. modern french, père-lachaise, paris, (raguenet). . steeple, st. pierre, montrouge, paris, (raguenet). tomb, st. lazare, montpellier, (raguenet). . granite, tomb, becon, (raguenet). the cross in metal. (plate .) wrought-iron, and, in late years, cast-iron and zinc, are sometimes used as a material for steeple and gable crosses, as well as for monu- mental crosses. the ductile nature of wrought-iron admits of a rich, delicate execution of these objects. the german renascence, in parti- ticular, offers a wealth of forms in this respect. the framework usually consists of strong bar-iron; the orna- mental decoration is in flat or round iron, fastened to the frame by clamps or rivets. hammered foliage is sometimes added. in many cases the point of the steeple cross is decorated with a cock as weather-vane. the centre of monumental crosses is often occupied by a plate of metal, to contain the inscription. plate . the cross: in metal. – . mediaeval steeple crosses, franconia, (gewerbehalle). . modern steeple cross, (bad. gewerbezeitung). . steeple cross, st. ambroise, paris, architect ballu, (raguenet). – . wrought-iron tomb crosses, thiengen, th century. the finial. (plate .) while the ordinary cross rises as a free-ornament in a vertical plane, the final makes a cross, in plan. it extends its arms not only the finial in stone, and in metal. sideways, but also regularly to the front and back. crocket-like ad- ditions (comp. plate ) clothe the stem, which usually takes the form of an elongated four or eight-sided shaft. there may be one or more tiers of crockets. the finial serves to decorate spires, pinnacles, baldachins, tombs, &c., and is a specifically gothic ornament. the most beautiful forms are furnished by french gothic, from which most of the il- lustrations of our plate are taken. plate . the finial: in stone. modern gothic. early gothic, (jacobsthal). french gothic, (viollet-le-duc.). early gothic, cathedral, chartres, th century, (musterorna- mente). – . modern, (viollet-le-duc). . modern, (bosc). : the finial in metal. (plate .) in the artistic wrought-iron work of the middle ages, the re- nascence, and modern times, we find charming finials in the shape of idealised flowers. these decorations are found on the tops of balaustrades, on the gables over doors, on brackets and chandeliers, on the supports of rain-spouts, on wall-anchors, &c. leaves, volute-like spirals, bell-flowers, and ears, are arranged round a central axis of iron; in many cases the centre is formed by spindle-shaped spirals of wire. plate . the finial: in metal. . corner of a mediaeval grill, (viollet-le-duc.). . part of a grill, toulouse cathedral, th century, (viollet-le-duc). . termination of a fountain, cluny museum, paris, th century, (l'art pour tous). . part of a spanish trellis gate, th century, (l'art pour tous). . part of a chancel screen, minster, freiburg, th century, (schau- insland). . wrought-iron, th century, (guichard). . terminal, bruges, th century, (ysendyck, documents classés de l'art). . modern, wrought-iron, ihne & stegmüller, berlin. . modern, post, by ende & boeckmann, berlin, (gewerbehalle). . wrought-iron coronal, limburg on the lahn, th century, (kachel, kunstgewerbliche vorbilder). . coronal, modern gate, c. zaar, berlin. ; free ornaments. the finial. plate meyer, handbook of ornament. free ornaments. the finial, &c. plate . the finial knob, and vase. — the pendant knob. the finial knob, and wase. (plate .) knob is the term applied to ornamental terminations in the form of profiled bodies of revolution, naturalistic buds, fir-cones, &c. knobs are small features used as the terminations in architecture and furniture. they are also used on flag-staffs, bosses of shields, centre-pieces of rosettes, &c. the material, whether stone, wood, stucco, metal, &c., depends on the use to which they are to be applied. wases form another class of finials. they are preferentially used on tombs, doorposts, in the centre of divided pediments, on the attics of ornamental architecture, and instead of antefixes. plate . the finial knob, and wase, – . stone, milan cathedral, italian gothic, (raguenet). . modern. . modern fir-cone. . modern wase, (bosc). . modern french, ministry of war, paris, (raguenet). – . modern french, house in the park monceau, architect tronquois, (raguenet). . lower end of a flag-staff or lightning-rod, (liénard) the pendant knob. (plate .) pendants are hanging terminations; reversed knobs, so to speak. in some cases, but not in all, the former may replace the latter. these pendants are more or less elongated bodies of revolution. the decoration is produced by the addition of leaves, scales, beadings, nulls, &c. these being specially suitable to convex profiles, while the channelled treatment is better adapted to concave profiles. pendants, in stone, wood, stucco, or metal, are used as brackets for lamps (hence their french name: cul-de-lampe); and as the lower terminations of oriel-windows, pulpits, &c. in the latter case the pendants are generally only in half or three-quarter relief from the wall. plate . the pendant knob. – . part of tripod, (jacobsthal). . part of lantern, dijon, french renascence, (l'art pour tous). . lower end of a chandelier, th century, (l'art pour tous). . bracket under a piscina, french, th century, church, moret, (l'art pour tous). . modern, stucco-work. modern, wood. * free ornaments. plate . the finial knob, and vase. free ornaments. l-t- : º c ( )/ º: the pendant knob. plate . the rosette. the rosette. (plate ) the rosette, strictly so called, is an artificial rose. in a wider sense any ornament of a circular shape, which radiates from a centre, may be termed a rosette. according to its execution and use: the rosette may be considered either as a free-ornament, or a panel- ornament. in the first case, it must always be plastic, project pro- minently and have some resemblance to the knob or pendant. in the latter case, it may be in low relief or be a flat ornament. here we have only to deal with the rosette as a free-ornament. considering the rosette from this point of view: its most im- portant application is as the boss in the centre of romanesque and gothic ribbed vaultings; and as the centre-piece of ceilings, of which we find numerous examples in the temples of the antique, the palaces of the italian renascence, and the vaulted cupolas of ecclesiastical and secular architecture. besides this, rosettes are found on fur- niture, gates and doors (the italian renascence makes the most lavish use of them in this capacity), and as the centre-pieces of modern ceilings, &c. in these cases, however, their quality as free-ornaments is less prominent. as regards the formal plan of rosettes: the flower motive is the commonest; geometrical motives are rarer, and motives from figures rarer still. the arrangement is usually in a series of zones; the growth is from the centre, outwards; and in the majority of cases is radial, that is at right angles to the bordering circle; but sometimes the leaves are curved. the rosette may have any number of divisions; but , , , , , , , or divisions are the rule; divisions into , , , &c., are as rare as divisions exceeding the number . the divisions may vary in the separate zones; but generally only so that the same divisions interlock, that is to say, the points of the leaves of one zone fall on the intervals between the leaves of the next. plate . the rosette. . antique, of four divisions. . roman, of five divisions. . naturalistic, of six divisions. . romanesque boss, of four divisions, chapter-hall of the monastery of heiligenkreuz near vienna, th century, (musterornamente). . early gothic boss, of three divisions, sainte-chapelle, paris, . french, of four divisions, louis xiii, ( – ), (muster ornamente). . italian, of five divisions, the door of the baptistery, parma, re- nascence, (musterornamente). - . modern french, ceiling-flower, stucco. free ornaments. the rosette. plate . free ornaments. plate . the crocket, and the gargoyle. the crocket, and the gargoyle. the crocket, and the gargoyle. (plate ). crocket is the designation applied to those excrescences which appear on the edges of spires, and pinnacles, and on the raking lines of gables, in the richer gothic styles. occurring at regular intervals, they form an ornamental interruption to the bald architectonic lines. at first of a rather naturalistic character (figs. and ), they evolved during the decay of the style a more artificial character, as- suming bulbous forms (fig. ), which have their own special peculiar- ities in england, france, and germany. crocket - ornamentation has more or less been copied from stone architecture in furniture, choir-stalls, &c. the arms of the latter (figs. — ), and the miserere-seats, are often foliated like a crocket. metal, and particularly wrought-iron work, frequently makes use of crockets, in forms suited to the nature of the material, (figs. – ). - contrary to the modern method, by which the water that collects on the roofs of buildings is conveyed to earth through pipes, the builders of the middle ages and the renascence discharged the rain, clear of the wall, by means of long projecting spouts. the spout was used in the antique style in the form of lion heads, &c. in the ecclesiastical and monumental architecture of the middle ages they are termed gargoyles; and are mostly of stone. in dwelling houses they are of sheet-metal; and they are either architectonically decorated (fig. ), or human, animal, or fantastic figures, treated in a comic manner, the water flowing through the mouth or other orifices of the body. copious material on the subject of crockets and gargoyles will be found in raguenet's “materiaux et documents de l'architecture”. plate . the crocket, and the gargoyle. – . front and side view of a plain gothic crocket, amiens cathedral, restored by viollet-le-duc, (raguenet). . gothic crocket, th century. . modern gothic crocket, paris, (raguenet). . gothic crocket milan cathedral, (raguenet). . arm of a stall, salisbury cathedral, (raguenet). – . arms of stalls, monastery, maulbronn. – . wrought-iron, gothic, augsburg. . gargoyle, viollet-le-duc, eglise d'eu, (raguenet). . gargoyle, bell-tower, st. sernin, toulouse, restored by viollet- le-duc, (raguenet). gargoyle, meaux cathedral, (raguenet). – . gargoyle, st. eustache, paris, (raguenet). the decorated hinge, &c. the decorated hinge, &c. (plate .) the middle ages, and after them the renascence, brought the developement of wrought metal-work to the highest state of perfection. here we have to consider the different kinds of bands, technically known, according to their shape, as hinge, strap, &c. although these bands were originally intended only to bind-to- gether the underlying wood construction of gates, doors, caskets, chests, &c., the bald, practical form was soon made decorative; and this the more readily that the gothic principle of wood construction, with its narrow stave-like or matched strips of wood, offered only scanty opportunities of artistic decoration. delicate series of lines, designed as free-ornaments, start from the hinge and terminate as leaves and flowers. the heads of the necessary rivets and screws, themselves shaped as rosettes in the richer examples, give a pleasing relief. gothic usually applies the extended strap-hinge (figs. – ); while the renascence, in accord- ance with its principle of bordering in wood constructions, prefers the shorter butt-hinge (figs. – ). in the latter epoch the surface of the metal received further decoration trough the arts of etching, engraving, niello-work, &c. book-mounts, in particular, offered a wide field for the application of these arts. modern times have with justice devoted increased attention to these objects; and have restored them to the domain of art from which various causes had excluded them for almost a century. the plate gives a small selection from the copious material to be found in museums and publications. plate . the decorated hinge, &c. . gothic hinge, church-door, wiersen near cologne, th century. — . plain terminations of hinges, hefner-alteneck collection, th century. – . terminations of hinges, town-hall, münster. . termination of hinge, prie-dieu, gelnhausen, th century, (musterornamente). gothic hinge, door of a cabinet, town-hall, zwolle. . gothic hinge. . renascence hinge, old kaufhaus, on the limmat, zürich, . renascence hinge, town-hall, augsburg, th century, (muster- ornamente). . renascence hinge, door in ettlingen, united collections, carls- ruhe. . door-hinge, german, , free imitation by prof. storck, (zeichenvorlagen). free ornaments. the decorated hinge, &c. plate . the tassel. – the fringe, and the valence. the tassel. (plate .) the chief contributions of textile art to the group of free-orna. ments are tassels, fringes, and laces. the two latter are current edgings, the first, on the contrary, are the termination of the lower end of cords or of shaped draperies. thus we find tassels used on girdles, bell-pulls, and curtain-holders; as pendants from flags, standards, valences, cushions, table-covers, palls, and tent-covers; also on pouches, hoods, caps, harness, &c. the tassel consists of a tuft of threads or cords, hanging straight down from a core of wood, turned in various profiles, and decorated with twisted threads. the original may be assumed to have been the cord with a simple knot, the knot being intended to keep the cord from ravelling-out. the tassel is undoubtedly of great antiquity. the reliefs found in khorsabad, niniveh, and elsewhere, show that the assyrians were great admirers of such kinds of trimming. and, although such a lavish use does not occur again; there would probably be little difficulty in finding examples of tassels from all periods of art. - not only form but also colour contributes to the effect of tassels, so that the examples in our plate really only give half the effect. an exhaustive study of trimmings, by jacob falke, will be found in teirich’s “blätter für kunstgewerbe” . plate . the tassel. . french lady's girdle, th century, (viollet-le-duc) — . tassels, holbein, (teirich). . tassels, turkish harness, th century, united collections, carlsruhe. . . tassel, old standard, united collections, carlsruhe. . tassel, tunisian pistol, united collections, carlsruhe. leather tassel, lady's bag, german renascence. – . modern tassels, by aug. töpfer, (gewerbehalle). . modern tassel, by a. seder, munich. the fringe, and the walence. (plate .) if, at the end of a piece of material, the weft-threads (parallel to the end) be drawn-out, the remaining warp-threads will form a simple fringe. if we give the end greater security, by knotting or tieing the threads together in tufts, we get the ordinary fringe. the fringe, however, is not always made of the material; it is often manufactured independently, and sewed-on to the edge of the material. in this case the fringe is combined with a woven heading-band (gimp). free ornaments. plate . the tassel. the fringe, the valence, and the lace border. richer types of fringes may be produced either by variety of the edge, so that tufts of unequal lengths form rhythmically alternating groups (fig. ), or by using several thicknesses of fringe, lying one behind the other, (fig. ). the fringe is always applied long, when a pendant termination is required. in other cases as, for example, where the fringed ma- terial is to lie horizontally, like small table-covers, napkins, &c., it is advisable to keep the fringe short. fringes have been in use from the very earliest periods; but it is again the orientals, and especially the assyrians, who show a pre- ference for this form. fringes occur perpetually in various national costumes, and in the toilet of our modern ladies. the renascence adopted the fringe as a trimming for furniture, and specially for chairs; although not always with true artistic feeling. the valence is a hanging textile termination; the lower edge is ornamentally cut, and is often ornamented with cords, tassels, em- broidery, &c. the upper edge of the valence is generally fixed to a moulding. valences occur as the interior furnishing of windows, on four-post beds, baldachins, canopies, tents, marquees, &c.; of late years, they have been used on awnings, and outside-blinds. plate . the walence. tomb of the incas, ancon, peru, united collections, carlsruhe. indian-mexican pouch, united collections, carlsruhe. egyptian, (ebers). . renascence, (storck). . mediaeval maniple, (teirich). turkish saddle-cloth, , united collections, carlsruhe. . renascence, silver. — . modern designs, by prignot. the lace border. (plate ) of all products of the textile art, lace is the most interesting. there is something poetical about it, like flowers. the combination of the conventional treatment with those accidental features which hand-work confers upon the delicate, light material, gives them a peculiar charm. who invented lace manufacture, and in what year, cannot now be determined. lace is one of those things which the renascence has handed down to us without having inherited it from the antique. the stimulus, to the invention of lace and the basis of its manufacture, is probably to be found in the textile hand-work of the middle ages, such as was practised, particularly in convents, for ecclesiastical purposes. free ornaments. zv - ||||||||||| º n º | (im | tººl º º º - º º | mºſ t º: ſº ſt | º the fringe, and the valence. plate . - free ornaments. sºº-ºººººººº-º-º-º-º: --- º º ºº: º cº.; – plate . the lace border. the lace border. lace belongs in most cases to the free-ornaments. more rarely it is manufactured as an insertion, with the character of a ribbon, or for independent use as a shawl or wrap. compared with fringe, the applications of lace are freer and more varied, and by no means con fined to the character of a pendant termination. the reader may be assumed to be acquainted with the various uses of lace. if we exclude the allied crochet-work as not strictly belonging to this section, we shall find that the manufacture of lace may be divided into two groups: ( ) sewed or point lace; and ( ) bobbin or pillow lace. the former method has chiefly been practised in italy, spain, ireland, and france; the latter in england, france, the nether- lands, schleswig, switzerland, and saxony. the chief centres of the lace industry were and to some extent still are: venice, genoa, milan, ragusa, devonshire, buckinghamshire, ireland, alençon, valenciennes, brussels, mechlin, binche, tondern, annaberg, &c. as in other branches, the cheap machine-made article has nowa- days reduced the manufacture of the dearer but far more valuable hand-made lace to very modest limits. see reports on lace, by alan s. cole (department of science and art). among the numerous kinds of lace for which no generally re- cognised terminology as yet exists, we have selected some, principally of older date, among which the best patterns are to be found: point coupé (punto tagliato). the linen ground is cut-out and the edges worked with the needle. point tiré (punto a maglia quadra). single compartments of a quadrangular knotted or woven net are filled-up. point tiré (punto tirato). the threads of the linen fabric are partially pulled-out, the others connected together and sewed round. point coupé (punto a reticella). groups of threads stretched lengthwise and crosswise like a net, are spun round and connected. point noué (punto a groppo). produced by plaiting and knotting the threads. point lace. the threads are sewed together, following the pattern, and joined together by “brides". this is almost the only kind of lace which can now be found on ladies' work-tables. plate . the lace border. . venetian guipure, old pattern-book. . point noué, end of the th century. – . old, point. – . modern, pillow, old patterns. . modern, knotted, with fringe, (macramé lace). meyer, handbook of ornament. c. supports. all those elements of ornamental art which express the idea of supporting or bearing, are here gathered into a special group to which is given the name “supports". supports, in the strict sense of the word, are piers or columns. but it does not fall within the scope of this work to treat these forms from the architectural point of view, or to enter into the details and proportions of the so-called “orders of architecture". all that is required on this point may be gained from the works of architectural specialists: bötticher, tektonik der hellenen; mauch and lohde, die architektonischen ordnungen; r. phené spiers, the orders of archi- tecture; vignola; durm and others. we will therefore disregard the undecorated forms, and discuss only the decorative details of these supports. like a tree which consists of root, trunk, and crown, piers and columns necessarily have a base, a shaft, and a capital. (the doric column is an exception as it has no base.) the natural model for the pier and the column is the trunk of a tree hewn into a cylindrical or prismatic form. the motive of the channellings and flutings of the shaft of a support is to be found in the channels and flutings of endogeneous plants. supports which, like piers and columns, are intended to bear a considerable weight, usually have a strong cylindrical or prismatic structure, generally tapering towards the top; the fundamental forms of the candelabrum, which is meant to bear only an inconsiderable weight, like lamps, &c., are freer, have more variety, and offer a wider field for decoration than the forms of the former group. the candelabrum is also divided into foot, shaft, and crown. the shaft, - supports. – the foliated shaft. again, is frequently composed of several distinct parts. the cande- labrum as a whole will receive a more detailed consideration in division iii, (utensils). small pillars, shaped like a pier, column, or candelabrum, are also used for the construction of balaustrades; in which case they have to support only a rail. the small pillars have thick, compact forms; balausters, on the contrary, are slender bodies of revolution, with great variety in the profile. very peculiar forms of support are the antique trapezophors or table-legs; the legs of modern furniture bear more resemblance to balauster pillars. terminus is the name given to supports which widen out in an upward direction like an inverted obelisk, and terminate in a bust or capital. beside the geometrical and plant elements, the human form is also used as a motive of supports. male forms thus used are termed atlantes; and female forms caryatids. the various forms of consoles are included in the group of supports. the foliated shaft. (plate .) we have already mentioned that the plant-world furnishes the motive for the forms of supports. reeds, canes, tree-trunks with knots, &c., were copied in the antique. the mural paintings of pompeii show lofty airy constructions with extremely slender, foliated supports. the bronze candelabra and lampadaria, intended to hold lamps, are often direct imitations of plant stems, while the roman state-candelabra are often decorated with artificial foliage. later epochs have made little change in this respect; it may be said in general that, as regards delicacy of feeling, and moderation in the application of natural forms, they have seldom reached and still more seldom surpassed the antique models. plate . the follated shaft. . finial of the choragic monument of lysikrates, athens, (in- tended for the reception of a bronze tripod), greek. . part of the shaft of a roman state-candelabrum, marble, vatican museum, rome. – . supports, mural paintings, pompeii, (jacobsthal). . graeco-italic, lamp-stand, bronze. upper part of shaft, graeco-italic candelabrum, bröndsted collec- tion, (vulliamy). * supports. º º gº º º | º plate . the foliated shaft. - the fluted shaft. — the base. the fluted shaft. (plate ) columns, piers, candelabra, and similar supports frequently have channellings or flutings. the object of these is to give animation to the smooth shaft, and to emphasize the expression of the principle of weight-bearing. this latter is specially true of the channellings. - in the doric style the flutings are shallow without any interval, only divided from each other by a sharp edge, (figs. and ). the ionic and corinthian shafts, have deeper flutings (figs. and ), separated from each other by fillets formed of the untouched surface of the shaft. the channellings terminate upwards like small niches, with semicircular or elliptical heads, (fig. ). leaf-like terminations, like that on fig. are rarer. the termination downwards is similar to those shown on figs. – . the number of channellings on a shaft varies from to . on smaller constructions, such as furniture, balausters, &c., the number is reduced; but seldom less than . the channellings taper proportionately with the shaft. pilasters are also channelled to match the columns. in strict architecture, rich and composite channellings and flutings are rather injurious than otherwise (figs. – ); but on candelabra, and mouldings they often produce a good effect. when applied to the torus and the cavetto: the former (convex) should be decorated by nurls; and the latter (concave) should have flutes. plate . the fluted shaft. — . sections of doric fluting. – . sections of ionic and corinthian fluting. – . construction of the terminations of fluting on cylindrical shafts. – . composite fluting, with sections, and terminations. . part of an antique candelabrum, with tapered fluting. . termination of the fluting, monument of lysikrates, athens. (the construction is clearly indicated on the drawings.) the base. (plate – ) it is unquestionably more beautiful when something in the shape of a base is interposed between the shaft of a column and the substructure on which it rests, than when, as in the doric style, the column rises without any such base. bases suggested by the radical leaves of plants, are common in oriental styles. plate , fig. gives an egyptian example of this kind. decorations of this sort are, however, oftener applied to the lower end of the shaft than supports. the fluted shaft. plate . the base. to the base itself. this natural method of decoration is also met- with on richly decorated examples of roman style, where a row of artificial leaves encircle the shaft, (plate . ). antique bases are composed of a square foundation slab (the plinth); and some mouldings which follow the circular plan of the shaft. the well-known and oft-used attic base, consists, beginning from below, of a plinth, a great torus, fillet, scotia, fillet, upper torus, fillet and apophyge. the last, as a quarter-hollow forms the transition between fillet and shaft. when the plinth is decorated, which is the case only in very rich examples, the motive is either a band or a scroll. the tori are de- corated with braided work, as shown on plate , the hollow or “scotia" is sometimes decorated with leaves, the smaller tori may be treated as astragals; and so on. plate shows three rich roman examples. others will be found in bötticher's tektonik der hellenen. the byzantine and romanesque periods follow the antique in the treatment of bases. the spaces which remain on the upper sur- face of the square plinth are, however, filled up with ornament (plate . , , , ), or with small animal figures, (plate . ). in the later gothic style the torus overlaps the sides of the plinth, which reduces these spaces; the corners of the plinth are also some- times finished as shown on plate . . - the gothic period prefers geometrical to organic form; and se- cures good effects by a variety of profiles placed high up on com- posite clustered columns, (plate . ) gives an example of this. remark the similarity with the chinese example, fig. , which would seem to have been suggested by a cluster of juxtaposed shafts. the renascence and modern styles resort to direct copying from the antique; but, as a rule, do not use ornamented mouldings. the treatment of the bases of piers and pilasters is usually identical with that of columns; so that there is no necessity for dealing with these separately. plate . the base: roman. . capitoline museum, rome, (de wico). . temple of concord, rome, (de vico). . baptistery of constantine, rome, (vorbilder für fabrikanten und handwerker). plate . the base: romanesque, &c. . egyptian, temple of tutmes iii, karnak, (raguenet). . chinese, (raguenet). . romanesque, coupled, schwarzach. – . mediaeval. . romanesque. supports. jnv º wºº! - ſº- º # º * gºº - º { }\}^{\{\}ſº, ſ/ º - º º º iſ jº º º º m. º! º- -> lºlº, | & º º º rºx º wºº º º ºś. jº º º §§ - §§§º. ~ | º m - - - sº ſº º §º § --- * * - cº- ----- nº-ºº: --- --- § ºğ) **ś. . ^ plate . the base. supports. the base. plate . the base. — the ornamented shaft. . romanesque, st. remy, reims, (raguenet). . romanesque, cistercian monastery, maulbronn. . romanesque, abbey “des dames", caen, (raguenet). . gothic, church, brou-asn., (raguenet). the ornamented shaft. (plates – ) the simplest, most natural and perhaps the most beautiful de- coration of a shaft is fluting, beyond which the antique very seldom goes. where it does: it clothes the stem in naturalistic fashion with plant-forms, (plate . ). in the byzantine, romanesque, and scandinavian styles: we often find the shaft covered with a geometrical network, and ornamented in a corresponding style, (plate . – ). the gothic style prefers to leave the slender shafts smooth. the renascence is not satisfied with the simple flute especially on small architectural work like altars, monuments, &c. the craving to give the column a decoration commensurate with that of the other parts of the architecture became irresistible. it is raised on a pedestal; the shaft is banded, being divided into parts by projecting cinctures, generally two, the lower at about one-third, the upper at about two- thirds of the height. on the lower part are suspended festoons, weapons, trophies, cartouches, &c., the upper part is channelled or decorated with artificial foliage (plate . ); finally, festoons of fruit or drapery are suspended from the capital. where the columns are not large, especially in furniture, the cylindrical shaft is replaced by the richer profiling of a more candelabrum- like form, (plate . ). flat ornamentation is also used, as well as plastic decoration, by means of painting, incrustation, or inlaying, (plate . ). all these methods of application are more or less in agreement with the object and principle of construction of the column, but the same cannot be said of the renascence and the following styles of the decadence, which build up their columns of large and small drums, alternately ornamented and plain, or even give the shaft a spiral twist and decorate it with spiral flutings. plate . the decorated shaft. . italian renascence, tomb in sta. maria del popolo, rome, by sansovino. romanesque. shaft, church, tournus, (raguenet). roman, marble. column, with intarsia decoration, german renascence, (hirth). : supports, supports, º º nº. º m - - º º plate . the profiled shaft. the ornamented shaft. – the capital. plate . the profiled shaft. candelabrum-like column, tester-bed, french renascence. lower part of a column, mayence cathedral. lower part of column, palais du commerce, lyons, (raguenet). column, diploma, modern. column, modern, (gerlach). : the capital. (plates – .) the upper termination of the column is the capital. the capital forms the transition from the supporting shaft to the superincumbent weight. this transition may assume either geometrical or organic forms. very frequently both systems are combined; so that, strictly speaking, we can only say that one system or the other predominates. the egyptian capital is suggested by the cinctured bundle of papyrus stems with buds (plate . , ), or with opened papyrus or lotus flowers, (plate . , ). abnormal capitals are found in the old persian style. plate . , gives an example from persepolis, composed of the fore-parts of bulls. as examples of oriental forms: two moorish capitals from the alhambra in granada are given on figs. and of the same plate. antique art adopts three general types of capitals: doric, ionic and corinthian. - the doric capital consists of the abacus, which is square in plan, and the echinos, which is circular. the transition to the shaft is effec- ted by hollow mouldings and astragals. the graeco-doric capital was painted. where the sides of the abacus are decorated: a fret pattern is employed (plate . ). the echinos is a member of conflict, and is ornamented accordingly. in the roman and renascence styles plastic ornamentation takes the place of painting. the band of leaves becomes an egg-and-dart ornament (plate . ). leaves pointing upward are sometimes used (plate . ). at the top of the abacus a small moulding is used. a necking, generally decorated with rosettes, is interposed between capital and shaft. similar rosettes decorate the spaces on the under side of the abacus (plate . – ). the ionic capital replaces the square abacus by a scroll rolled- in on both sides, in great volutes. the intervals, between the egg band and the scroll, are marked by palmettes. a neck may be added as in the doric capital, and it is frequently decorated with a pal- mette ornament (plate . – ). the side view of the scroll shows plain profilings as on plate . , decorated with leaves or scales in the richer examples. the ionic capital has two faces, and the capital. two sides. for this reason it is of only limited application, as, when the capital is applied to the corner column of two adjacent sides of a building, it is impossible to avoid a bad effect from the two reentering volutes on the inner faces. the fundamental form of the corinthian capital is the calix. the decoration may be designed on two methods. firstly a row of leaves, or two rows arranged alternately one above the other, clothe the lower cylindrical part of the capital, and plain broad waterleaves form the transition to the square abacus. to this class belongs the capital of the tower of the winds in athens, and a capital found on the island of melos, which is shown on plate . . or, secondly: volutes rise from the rows of leaves and unite in pairs under the corners of the abacus, which are then extended, so that the sides are rendered concave in plan. the centre of each sides of the abacus is decorated with a palmette or rosette (plate . – ). the fusion of the ionic and corinthian capitals produced the composite capital; whose appearance is more interesting than beautiful (plate . ). early christian, and, to a certain extent, byzantine and roma- nesque art, models the forms of capital on those of the antique. the corinthian capital is the one mostly followed. the details are made correspondingly simpler and ruder (plate . – ). but along side of these reminiscences of the antique, new and independent forms appear. the antagonism between the cylindrical under part and the square upper termination is adjusted by geometrical construc- tions. thus originated the cushion and the trapeziform capital. the cushion capital is specifically romanesque. a half sphere is cut by planes below and on the four sides. its simplest form is given on plate . . the decoration is sometimes geometrical (plate . and ), and sometimes contains foliage and figures (plate . ). the double-cushion capital is a variant of the cushion capital (plate . ). the trapeziform capital is specifically byzantine. in this style: the cylindrical shaft is continued to the square abacus, which causes each side of the capital to assume a trapeziform shape (plate . ). very often these capitals are richly decorated with figures. - the arrangement of clustered-shafts, so popular in the middle ages, led to the coupled-capital, which appears sometimes as con- joined capitals (plate . ), and sometimes as the juxtaposition of two ordinary capitals with a conjoined abacus. in the gothic style, particularly in its later period, the abacus becomes octagonal. crocket-like knots of leaves are loosely attached to the calix-formed core. the vigourous projections of these leaf ornaments give the capital the appearance of an inverted bell (bell capitals, plate . – ). t the renascence adopts the doric and ionic capitals, and more the capital. usually the corinthian capital directly borrowed from the antique; but the forms become freer and more varied; and, compared with the overcharged roman examples, simpler. the volutes at the corners develope into independent forms, and are often replaced by dolphins, cornucopias, and other fantastic forms, scattered instances of which may, however, be found even in the antique. modern architecture, like the renascence, also follows these traditions. plate . the capital. . ancient persian, persepolis. . egyptian, köm-ombo. . * philae. . * memnonium thebes. . * luxor, (owen jones). – . moorish capitals, alhambra, hall of the two sisters, (raguenet). . graeco-doric. . roman-doric, thermae of diocletian, (mauch and lohde). . doric, italian renascence, by barozzi da vignola. plate . the capital. . graeco-ionic, (jacobsthal). . ionic, bassae, (cockerell). . ionic, pompeii. . roman-ionic, (musterornamente). . graeco-ionic, erechtheum, athens. . ionic, louvre, paris. . antique corinthian, found in melos, (vorbilder für fabrikanten und handwerker). . greek-corinthian, monument of lysikrates, athens. . roman-corinthian, palaces of the emperors rome. . roman composite, louvre, paris. i : plate . the capital. . romanesque cushion-capital, st. gereon, cologne, (otte). . * * , the abbey church, laach, (otte). . byzantine, sta. sofia, constantinople. romanesque double-cushion-capital, rosheim church, xi. cen- tury. , romanesque double-cushion-capital. . romanesque cushion-capital, freiburg. – . romanesque, former cloisters of the church, schwarzach. . romanesque coupled-capital. . romanesque. supports. plate . the capital. supports. º f º ººzººlºº wºº º §§ºğ º zººs - § nº. sº nº. º º º- º \ the capital. meyer, handbook of ornament. plate . supports. plate . the capital. supports, the capital. plate . * supports. Šºć plate . the pilaster panel. the capital. – the pilaster panel. . romanesque cushion-capital, monastery, lippoldsberg. – . late gothic, triforium of the choir, minster freiburg. plate . the capital. renascence, drawing by holbein, (guichard). — . renascence, designs by heinrich voigtherr, (hirth). composite, italian. renascence, palazzo scrofa, ferrara, italian. renascence, tomb in sta. maria del popolo, rome, by san. sovino. renascence, italian, palazzo zorzi, venice. modern, municipal baths, carlsruhe, architect durm. modern french, vaudeville theatre, paris, architect magne. i : the pilaster panel. (plate .) in many cases the pilaster or wall-pier shaft is devoid of orna- ment. unlike the column, the pilaster does not, as a rule, taper up- wards; and if the pilaster is ornamented with fluting the tapering is never permissible. the pilaster frequently has cinctures, generally two, the lower at 'la, the upper at “ls of its height. the ornamental decoration, when present, takes the form of an elongated, sunk panel bordered by a moulding. the ornamentation may be of three kinds: firstly: an ascending plant motive may be used, rising symmetrically or in the form of a wavy line from calices, vases, &c., animal and human figures being not infrequent accessories; secondly, the decora- tion may consist of festoons of flowers, fruits, trophies, shields, &c., varied by knots and ribbons, the points of suspension being rosettes, rings, lion heads, &c.; thirdly, the panel may be decorated with flat strapwork, as in the elizabethan manner. of these three kinds of decoration the first is the most used; and the most suitable. few antique examples have come down to us; the middle ages make scarcely any use of the pilaster; but the renascence is much richer in such examples. stalls, altars, sepulchral-monuments are scarcely to be found without pilasters. plate offers a small selection from the copious material; all the panels show the first of the three kinds of decoration. - plate . the pilaster panel. . italian renascence. – . italian renascence, sta. maria dei miracoli, venice. – . italian renascence, by benedetto da majano. – . modern panels, in the style of the italian renascence. the pilaster capital. the pilaster capital (plates – ) generally speaking, the structure of the capital of the pilaster follows that of the column; and, to a certain extent, translates the forms of the latter from the round to the flat. this observation is true in the renascence period; but not in the antique. in pilaster-capitals in the doric style one or more leaf or egg- and-dart mouldings run under the abacus, and are covered at the corners with palmettes or leaves. beneath this proper part of the capital a neck more or less high is usually found, decorated with rosettes or with other ornaments (plate . ). on modern capitals of this class the neck may even be fluted (plate . ); not infre- quently the centre of the capital is still further decorated by the addition of masks, symbols, &c. (plate . and ). while the renascence adopted the form of the ionic capital with scarcely any change for its pilasters (plate . ), the antique possessed a special form of pilaster capital of this order (plate . ). the most numerous, varied and beautiful capitals of pilasters are in the corinthian order. the profile and general arrangement are the same as with the columns; generally, however, the pilaster is broader in proportion to its height. the lower part is encircled by artificial leaves which sometimes dwindle to the two corner leaves supporting the volutes. the volutes are of the most varied descrip- tions, sometimes replaced by cornucopias, dolphins, chimeras, and other figures (plates . and . ). leaf-ornaments, vases, garlands, calices of flowers, &c., are arranged at the centres (plate . – ), also masks (plate , , and ). neckings are rare on corinthian capitals (plate . ). the egg-and-dart mouldings, which run along the bottom of antique examples (plate . – ), are reminiscences of the doric style, so that these forms may also be regarded as a kind of transition capital. plate . the pilaster capital. greek-doric anta, erechtheum, athens. greek-ionic anta. greek-corinthian. . roman-corinthian, (bötticher). roman-corinthian, pantheon, rome. roman-corinthian, temple of mars ultor, rome, (de vico). : — plate . the pilaster capital. . corinthian, italian renascence, court of the scala dei giganti, venice, (wiener bauhütte). supports. * - ------------ º º º º - lp º % § % º §º. \ s. ºf&## . the pilaster capital. plato . supports. plate . the pilaster capital. supports. the pilaster capital. plate . the pilaster capital. — the candelabra base. corinthian, italian renascence, sta. maria dei miracoli, venice. corinthian, italian renascence, certosa, florence. corinthian, italian renascence, scuola di san marco, venice, by pietro lombardo. – . corinthian, italian renascence, chapel of the palazzo vecchio, florence, (musterornamente). corinthian, italian renascence. . corinthian, french renascence, tomb of louis xii, st. denis. : plate . the pilaster capital. . corinthian, italian renascence, portal of san michele, venice. — . corinthian, italian renascence, palace of the doges, venice. ionic, french renascence, (lièvre). wrought-iron, castle at athis-mons, french, th century. wrought-iron, by jean berain, french, th century, (raguenet). modern doric, architects kayser and v. grossheim. modern doric, new opera house, paris, architect garnier. modern ionic, rue dieu, paris, architect sedille. modern corinthian, atelier of a painter, paris, sculptor bloche. i the candelabrum foot. (plate ) for lighting, the candelabrum played an important part in the domestic and religious life of the ancients. in the house, they mostly employed slender, delicate bronze candelebra; and for religion, the great state-candelabra of marble. the candelabrum, like the column, consists of three parts: the base, the shaft, and the capital. to afford the necessary steadiness, the base of the candelabrum is planned on a comparatively large scale, and divided into three legs, which stretch-out, towards the points of an equilateral triangle. for the foot, the claw of an animal, and in particular the claw of the lion, is used. not infrequently the claws rest on balls or discs (plate . ). the transition to the shaft is designed with a double calix, the upper leaves of which rise and encircle the shaft, and the lower leaves descend and mask the junction of the three legs (plate . and ). a delicate anthemion may be perceived between each pair of feet on richer examples (plate . and ). in exceptional cases the leg appears to grow from the mouth of an animal (plate . ). occasionally a circular, profiled and decorated disc is used instead of the double calyx and anthemion. sometimes, too, the shaft is prolonged downwards beneath the disc in the form of a knob, but does not touch the ground. the candelabrum base, & shaft. it is obvious that the delicate forms and the division into legs, whicn was so suitable for a material like bronze, could not be trans- ferred directly to the construction in marble; but reminiscences of it may be seen in the retention of the triangular ground-plan, the re- duced claws, the double calyx, &c. (plate . ). plate . the candelabrum base. . antique, bronze, museum, naples, (bötticher). . n (bötticher). . }} n studj publici, florence, (weissbach and lotter- moser). – . antique, bronze, museum, naples. – . legs from antique candelabra: the former found in the ruins of paestum; the other in the museum, naples. . roman, state-candelabrum. . renascence candelabrum, collection of drawings, uffizi, florence. the candelabrum shaft. (plate .) the decoration of the shaft of the antique bronze domestic candelabrum is simple; and consists of flutings or channellings, some- times of naturalistic buds and leaves. far richer is the ornamentation of the antique state-candelab- rum. it is divided into zones (plate . ), or the shaft swells and diminishes alternately, giving a richer profile (plate . ). smooth and fluted parts with contrast with foliage and figure; and the ascending decoration is varied by trophies and festoons. the effect depends on the propriety of the division. the repetition of similar masses or similar forms becomes tedious. the antique and also the renascence, particularly in italy, has transmitted to us a number of standard forms of candelabra; of which a few examples are reproduced plate . plate . the candelabrum shaft. . roman, marble. . roman, marble. . antique, (bötticher). . mast-socket, piazza of s. mark, venice, bronze, italian renas- cenc . . candelabrum-like foot of a holy water-stoup, pisa cathedral, italian renascence. . italian renascence, badia near florence. supports. plate . the candelabrum base. supports. º vº Ǻ --- vº nº. º --- --- ſº --- cºº" ------. the candelabrum shaft. plate . the candelabrum capital. — the balauster. the candelabrum capital. (plate .) the capital of a candelabrum has a plate or cup-like form, according as it is destined to receive a lamp, or a candle. the tops of the antique bronze candelabra, as a rule, are, profiled like the so-called krater (figs. – ). - the profiles, and ornamentation already given, may be re- garded as standards. the insertion of real capitals, or of figures, as bearers (fig. ) is rarer. the marble candelabra of the antique usually terminate in a plate or table (fig. ); and this is also the case with the renascence candelabra intended to receive candles. these were not placed in a cylindrical socket but stuck on a co- nical pricket. on the decoration of candelabra the reader may compare the plates dealing with this subject in division iii, (group of utensils). plate . the candelabrum capital. – . antique, museum, naples. . roman. . renascence, drawing in the uffizi, florence. the balauster. (plate .) balausters are small squat columns of circular or square plan. sometimes they are only symmetrical around their axis, sometimes however they are also symmetrical in an upward and downward direc- tion. in most cases their construction is that of the candelabrum. they may be divided into base, shaft, and capital. ranged side-by-side in a row, balausters are employed by the renascence and modern art in parapets, balconies, attics, and stair- cases. when the balausters are placed on a stair-case: the bases and capitals are either slanting, or the horizontals of the balausters follow the slanting lines of the stair-case. the latter method was adopted in the decadence of the renascence, but is unjustifiable; and can, in any case, only be adopted with balausters of a square or oblong plan. a rich variety may be obtained by the use of square and cylindrical forms in the same balauster (fig. ). the balauster is occasionally used as a support for stalls, and on furniture. ra- guenet's “documents et materiaux" contains a large number of ba- lausters; from which we have selected some examples. supports. the candelabrum capital. plate . supports. plate . the balauster. the balauster. — the terminus, plate . the balauster. . square plan, italian renascence, sta. maria della salute, venice. . a system of square balausters, palazzo pesaro, venice. . circular plan, modern italian. wood, italian renascence, stalls in sta. maria novella, flo- rence. . modern french, architect roux, paris. – . square wooden, (bethke: “der decorative holzbauer"). – . modern, terracotta. the terminus. (plate ) the terminus is a pilaster-like support, the fundamental form of which is characterized by tapering downwards in a manner re- calling an inverted obelisk. the name is derived from the fact that similiar constructions were used in the antique as milestones and to mark the terminations of fields, &c. the terminus consists of the profiled base, not infrequently supported on a special pedestal (figs. and ); the shaft tapering downwards and usually ornamented with festoons (figs. , , , ); and the capital, which is often re- placed by a bust or half-figure (figs. , , ). in this latter case, it assumes the appearance of a caryatid; and, as the bust is that of hermes (the god of letters), this application is often termed a “hermes". standing isolated, it serves as a pedestal for busts and lamps, as a post for railings, and in gardens and terraces. the last was exceedingly popular in the rococo period. joined to the wall, the terminus often takes the place of the pilaster. this is especially true of the furniture and small architectural constructions of the renascence period. it is also not uncommon on utensils, e. g. tri. pods, handles of pokers, seals, &c. plate . the terminus. . upper part, antique, silver treasure of hildesheim, berlin museum, (obviously from a roman tripod). . stone terminus bust, italian renascence, willa massimi, rome, (raguenet). . stone terminus bust, german renascence, mantel-piece, town- hall, lübeck. . stone terminus bust, german renascence, otto heinrich build- ing, heidelberg castle. . stone terminus bust, german renascence, monument, church of the castle, pforzheim. meyer, handbook of ornament. supports. plate . the terminus. the terminus. – the parapet. — the railing post. – . wooden terminus, renascence. . small terminus figure, german renascence, national museum, munich. . terminus with mask, modern chimney-piece, (gewerbehalle). the parapet. (plate .) besides the parapets which are formed by rows of balausters, there are others which are arrangements of pierced or perforated tsone or wood, and cast or wrought iron. the gothic style prefers tracery, the renascence prefers scrolls for stone parapets (figs. and ). parapets of perforated wood, which are typical of swiss architecture, are composed of strips of boards, with shapes more or less rich, care being taken that the intervening spaces also form pleasing shapes. to construct parapets in the form of bi-axial trellises, was a popular custom of the renascence; and it has continued so to the present day. but the function of the supports is only fully shown when the pattern has an upward direction. this, however, does not ex- clude the use of other treatments, e.g. panels. raguenet has nume- rous examples. piate . the parapet. . modern gothic, stone, viollet-le-duc, (raguenet). . modern gothic, stone, viollet-le-duc, castle of pierrefonds, (raguenet). . stone, german renascence, dagobert tower, new castle, baden- baden. – . trellis, schinkel, (vorb. f. fabr. u. handw). . modern french, hôtel mirabeau, paris, architect magne, (raguenet). . trellis, barocco, wrought-iron, french. railing post. (plate .) staircase railings, are formed of rows of upright posts. these are of slender, delicate form; and take the place of the stouter balauster. the usual materials for balausters are stone, terracotta, and wood; the railings, on the other hand, are of metal, or, in their simpler forms, of wood. in the last decades, cast-iron was the ma- * supports. - the railing post. plate . the railing post. — the furniture leg. terial most often used; but lately a return has been made to the more plastic wrought-iron. the ornamentation depends on the material selected. wrought - iron posts are decorated with scrolls and tendrils, while cast-iron uprights are decorated in bas-relief. if the railing-post has to stand on a horizontal plane, it is ad- visable to construct the foot in the manner shown in figs. , , and ; if it is to be affixed to the sides of the treads of a staircase, arrangements similar to those in figs. , , and , are necessary. where the upper end has to support the hand-rail, independent terminations, like figs. and , may be adopted. spherical heads may be applied to all angles (fig. ). plate . the railing post. . modern post, cast-metal, architect v. leins, stuttgart, (ge- werbehalle). . modern post, cast-metal, architect v. hoven, frankfurt, (ge- werbehalle). modern post, wrought-iron, (gewerbehalle). cast-metal. zy ,, architects gropius and schmieden. - plain wooden post. – . modern posts, cast-metal, architect v. hoven, frankfurt. ) . . the furniture leg. (plate .) the legs of wood furniture may be divided into two classes according to their height. tables and chairs have high legs; low legs or feet serve as supports for all kinds of cabinet and box-like articles. the general plan is that of a balauster-like body of revolution as turned on the lathe. angular forms, however, are also used. high legs are frequently decorated with carved ornaments; low legs are usually left plain; and this would seem to be in accordance with their character. metal feet are sometimes used for small pieces of furniture like caskets. where the legs have to stand on the floor: it is advisable to taper them downwards (figs. – ); where they have to stand on raised platforms and seldom require to be moved: it is better to furnish them with a pedestal (fig. ). it has lately become fashion- able to apply metal casters to pianos, heavy chairs, couches, &c. the furniture leg. — the trapezophoron. plate . the furniture leg. modern. . modern. . modern. . modern. – . various old designs. the trapezophoron. (plates – ) “trapezophoron" is the name given to the support of the antique table. they were usually of marble, the top itself was of wood or stone, sometimes ornamented with mosaic. we may distinguish two principal classes of antique tables: the circular table with three legs (compare plate . ); and the oblong table, resting on two end-supports (compare . and . ). the lower part, of the support of the round table, consists of a great leg which generally passes into a foliated calyx with a small head of a lion, lynx, panther, or other animal growing out of it ( . — ). the heads are sometimes human ( . ) or human half-figures, such as the genius bearing a bowl on plate . — . in the early period of antique art we find forms of more architectonic character like plate , fig . the end-support for the oblong table is a symmetrical duplication of the motive of the single leg already men- tioned, with the addition of wings, and with the space between the animal forms filled either by figures or ornaments (plate . – and . ). very striking in both classes of support is the differ- ence in scale of the various elements (a phenomenon which also appears elsewhere in roman art). on antique table-legs the reader may also consult division iii, (furniture). plate . the trapezophoron. . three-legged table, roman, legs of marble, table-top of mosaic. – . front and side view of the support of a roman table, found in the atrium of the house of cornelius rufus in pompeii, (fragments de l'architecture). . support of antique table. – . marble support of roman table, lynx head and claw, museum, naples. – . marble support of roman table, panther head and claw, bri- tish museum. – . marble support of roman table, lion head and claw, vatican, rome. supports. plate . the furniture leg. - supports. plate . the trapezophoron. supports. plate . the trapezophoron. the trapezophoron. – the console. plate . the trapezophoron. . marble support of antique table, museum, naples (judging from the symbolism of the ornamentation, the leg is probably from a table sacred to zeus), (l'art pour tous). — . front and side view of a small roman table-support, marble, naples museum, panther claw, eros garbed with the nebris. roman table-support, marble, british museum. , head of hercules and lion claw, : : vatican. . antique support, marble, (vulliamy). the console. (plates – .) the form of the console is extremely varied; as are its uses and applications. it is determined by the function, and the material of which it is made, as well as by the style of the period. architectural members of the character of consoles are early found in the chinese and indian, as also in the assyrian style; but in the egyptian style they are wanting. volute consoles, very beautifully developed, are found sporadi- cally in the greek style; but the roman style was the first to make an extensive use of these forms. the decorated ends of beams are probably to be regarded as the original model for consoles. the s-shaped double volute, with a large and a small spiral, is the standard form. in this console, the line of construction and the space for the actual decoration are given in the side-view, while the front, which is subordinate, is ornamented by scale motives, and leaves, which adapt themselves in graceful curves to the standard forms. when the console is used in the console-band of a cornice, or as the bracket of a balcony, its attitude is recumbent. when it sup- ports the cornices of doors and windows, its attitude is erect. no other application is known in the antique. a beautiful example occurs on the north door of the erechtheum at athens (plate . – ). some examples of recumbent consoles, of roman style, are given in figs. – , of the same plate. the example — , of the late roman epoch, shows decorative accessories of swans. the bend of the curve of the volute here departs from the normal example, and approaches a more convex curve, which is demanded by the static calculation for these supports. the early christian and romanesque art adopted coarse copies of the antique, and also created new ones suited to the new require- ments. thus early, we find those modillion forms which become typical for the wooden architecture of the middle ages, being chiefly the console. used beneath mouldings, and in corners of doors between the jambs and the lintel. the example on plate . may be taken as representative of this kind of support. another class of supports exhibits a central core, tapered downwards, like pendants with a polygonal or round plan (plate . and ). this latter form is also used in gothic art as a bracket for the statues of the saints, which were applied to piers and the arches of portals. the renascense remodels the last-named console in its own way, but recurs by preference to the antique form (plate . ), some- times reversing the volutes (plate . – ), and giving the front a richer and more independent ornamentation (plate . ). the combination of several smaller consoles to form a composite-con. sole, is shown on plate . fig. . just as the pendant-consoles of the gothic style imitate the calyx capital, so too does the rena- scense remodel the doric, ionic, and corinthian capitals for consoles (plate . — ). in wood architecture, we meet with consoles which have the form of richly-decorated struts (plate . ). the barocco style, which followed the renascence, also made essential additions to the richness of the forms. the strict line of the volute is abandoned and frequently broken by straight lines (plate . – ). the console is shaped in front-view like a pen- dant triangle, or typographical tail-piece (plate . and ). an- other invention of this period is the triglyph-console (plate . ). the rococo period abandons the traditional standards, and sacri- fices construction to picturesque license. shell-work, and unsymme- trical scrolls, serve as supports. modern art recasts the elements of former styles, without adding anything essentially new, unless we regard as a novelty the custom of placing busts, clocks, and knicknacks, on independent consoles which are used as brackets. finally: we may mention that in almost every style, consoles in the various forms have been used as the keystones of door and window lintels, in which case they are, generally speaking, not supports, as they have nothing to support. it should be considered inadmissible to apply distorted consoles i.e. those which have vertical sides though they are on the raking sofits of pediments, as was done in the late roman period, and in imitation thereof by the renascence in some examples. - examples, of all periods, will be found in raguenet's work; and an exhaustive essay on the console by dr. p. f. krell in the ge- werbehalle, , no. . plate . the console. – . front and side view, greek, north door, erechtheum, athens. – . front and side view, roman, vatican. supports. rºps the console. plate . supports. the console. plate . supports. zºº plate . the bracket. the console. — the bracket. – . roman, front and side view, temple of jupiter stator, rome watican. – . roman, front and side view, vatican. plate . the console. – . renascence, side views, vatican. . renascence, hôtel d'assezat, toulouse, (raguenet). . renascence, wooden, french, hôtel d'assezet, toulouse, (ra- guenet). . renascence, istrian limestone, venetian, hamburg, museum. . renascence, marble, italian, sta. maria de' miracoli, venice, (gropius). – . modern, french, architect roux, paris. – . ) - ) ) . mediaeval, church, athis, france. plate the console. . romanesque, noyon cathedral, th century, (raguenet). . gothic, st. pierre sous vezélay, (gewerbehalle). . renascence, french, castle, blois. .— . renascence, german, new castle, baden-baden, (gmelin). . renascence, german, heidelberg castle. . renascence, triglyph-console, late french. . modern, french, library, louvre, architect lefuel, (raguenet). . modern, french, (raguenet). . modern, french, new casino, lyons, architect porte, (raguenet). the bracket. (plate ) a special class of supports is formed by those wrought-iron bearers which the middle ages, the renascence, and modern times, have produced in the shape of brackets. the uses of brackets are very various, e. g. in supporting shop-signs, conduit-pipes, gargoyles, candles, lamps, hats, coats, &c. in form, they vary with the style and richness of the work- manship. square, flat and round iron, enriched by chasing and other methods of decoration, are used. they are frequently fastened to the wall by the aid of ribbon-like strips of metal, which may themselves be decorated with scrolls and curls. the plate shows a number of such supports, of ancient and mo- dern date, destined for a variety of purposes. meyer, handbook of ornament. the bracket. — the caryatid, and the atlante. plate . the bracket. — . part of reading-desk, s. benedetto, near mantua, italian re. nascence, (gewerbehalle). . wrought-iron, sign, regensburg, german renascence, (muster- ornamente). . wrought-iron bearer of conduit-pipe, kloster lichtenthal near baden, german renascence, (gmelin). . wrought-iron bearer of water-stoup, sepulchral cross in ceme- tery, kirchzarten, german renascence, (schauinsland). – . wrought-iron supports, for gargoyles, german renascence. . wrought-iron, sign, modern, architect crecelius, mainz. . modern wrought-iron bracket, (badische gewerbezeitung). the caryatid, and the atlante. (plates and .) the freest and the richest motive for supports, is the human figure. as early as egyptian and persian architecture, we find human figures as bearers of beams and roofs. the greek and roman styles also make use of this motive. the modern names for such supports are derived from the antique. accord- ing to greek mythology, atlas supports the vault of heaven at the ends of the earth. hence is derived the name “atlantes” for these male supporters. they are also sometimes termed “telamons". the name “caryatids", for female supporting figures, is derived from the town of caryae in the peloponnesus. according to another version the caryatids are imitations of the virgins who danced in the temple at caryae at the feast of diana. according to vitruvius, their intro- duction into architecture is owing to the fact that ladies of caryae, as a punishment for the support they rendered to the persians, were carried into captivity and compelled to serve as carriers of burdens. the caryatids are termed “canephora" (basket bearers), when capitals in shape like a basket are interposed between their heads and the superincumbent burden. among well-known examples in the antique are the atlantes in the temple of jupiter at agrigentum, and the caryatids of the erechtheum at athens. the middle ages made little use of atlantes and caryatids; the renascence and the following styles, cn the contrary, used them freely. atlantes and caryatids occur isolated, and connected with walls; and in both high and bas-relief. sometimes the whole length of the figure is employed, sometimes only the upper half in conjunction with a console (plate . – ), or with terminus-like bases (plate . – ). composite bearers in the form of double caryatids are also a popular motive, as shown by the example on plate , from the louvre at paris. supports. plate . the caryatid, the atlante, &c. * supports. plate . the caryatid, &c. the caryatid, the atlante, &c. plate . the caryatid, the atlante, &c. . greek caryatid, erechtheum, athens, (vorbilder für fabrikanten und handwerker). . antique caryatid, willa mattei, after piranesi, (vorbilder für fabrikanten und handwerker). modern french atlante, house in paris, sculptor caillé, (ra- guenet). – . modern, front and side views of half-figure consoles, ziegler and weber, carlsruhe. plate . the caryatid, &c. . modern, double caryatid, louvre, paris, (baldus). — . modern, caryatids, conservatoire des arts et métiers, paris, sculptor e. robert, (raguenet). – . modern, caryatids, director c. hammer, nuremberg. – . modern, caryatids, director c. hammer, nuremberg. d. enclosed ornament. (panels) that method of treatment, which has for its object to decorate a plane surface, and to cover it with ornament, &c., by means of painting, inlaying, engraving, etching, &c., we term flat decoration. this falls into two classes. firstly the ornament may be de- signed for a definite, bounded space, such as an oblong, according to artistic rules, so that it fits exactly into this space alone: in which case it is a discontinuous or “panel" ornament. or, secondly, the ornament may extend itself in every direction, repeating its details without regard to any definite boundary: in which case it is a con- tinuous or “diaper" ornament, such as a wall-paper. turning our attention first to discontinuous or panel-ornament: we shall find, in addition to objects whose boundaries are arbitrary and to be fixed at will, that we have principally to consider the following shapes: the square, the other regular polygons, the circle, the oblong, the ellipse, the lunette, the various forms of the span- rail, the lozenge and the triangle. geometrical, natural, and artificial elements, either singly or combined, are used. the character of the ornament may be natura- listic, or it may be artificial, and adapted to some pre-arranged leading-lines of the shape. this book does not treat of examples of the former character. those of the latter character, i. e. artificial ornament, will depend on the attitude of the panel with regard to the horizon. enclosed ornament. — the square panel. when the panel is mon-axial, i. e. it is symmetrical on both sides of one axis: then the panel-ornament is suitable to a vertical surface. when it is developed regularly in all directions from the centre of the figure, and is symmetrical to two or more axes: then the panel-ornament is suitable to a horizontal surface. the central feature of a horizontal panel is not infrequently emphasized by a rosette ornament, while the decoration of the remaining surface is kept in low-relief. trifling variations, from absolute symmetry and regularity, are often met-with; but they are confined to the details, the impression of symmetry and regularity being preserved in the general effect. these remarks, as well as some further relations arising out of the nature of the subject, we now proceed to illustrate in detail in the following chapters and plates. for the most part we shall con- fine ourselves to the best known and most frequent figures; and shall only offer some few examples of abnormal panels. the square panel. (plates – .) the lines, on which the decoration of the square may naturally be based, are the two diagonals, and the two diameters which join the centre of the opposite sides. these lines cut each-other in a common point, the centre of the shape; and form an eight-rayed star with rays of alternately unequal lengths. they divide the figure into equal spaces, which are usually decorated with repeated orna- ment, and are therefore suitable to the horizontal attitude, (compare plate , figs. – and others). numerically this mode of deco- ration is predominant. rarer are the cases in which the angle is once more bisected and the square consequently divided into tri- angles, (compare plate , fig. ). the simplest decoration is the many-rayed star, which is termed the uraniscus, in the coffers or greek ceilings (comp. plate , fig. ). the centre of the figure is generally accentuated by the addition of a rosette, and the direction of growth, like plant-motives, is from the centre outwards (plate , fig. , , , and others); or alternately from the centre outwards and inwards (comp. plate . ). slight variations from strict symmetry and regularity are partly caused by the use of the geo- metrical interlaced band (plate . and ), and are partly the deliberate result of artistic freedom of conception (plate . . and . ). the latter example is highly remarkable in this respect; and its originality may serve as a model. the example is also one of the rare cases in which the ornamentation is symmetrical to the diagonals, and not to the diameters. the square panel. another kind of square decoration is that in which it is sub- divided into separate spaces, each of which receives an independent ornamentation. plates and of the handbook give a number of such divisions of squares; a similar mode of decoration will be found on plate , fig. , plate , figs. and , and elsewhere. the decoration of the square in an upright attitude, with symmetry to one axis, belongs to the same category as the oblong; and we may therefore refer to what will be said below with reference to this latter figure. square panel are to be found in all styles; we have taken some striking examples from the coffer-ceilings of the antique and the renascence, from the pavement-tiles of the middle ages, and from the metal-work of the renascence and modern times. plate . the square panel. . greek, uraniscus, coffer of ceiling, propylaea, athens. . roman, bas-relief, found during the rectification of the tiber near the farnesina, rome, in , museo tiberino. ) roman, mosaic pavement, pompeii, (owen jones). byzantine, bas-relief, san marco, venice, (owen jones). . assyrian pavement, kouyunjik, (owen jones). – . greek, coffers of ceilings, propylaea, athens. . " ' " ,, , athens. . ) n n , parthenon. . . plate . the square panel. . decoration, of a book, th century, library of the duke of devonshire, (racinet). . scandinavian bas-relief, celtic stone cross, churchyard, meigle, angus, (owen jones). . bas-relief, tomb of “pierre le vénérable", cluny museum, th century, (l'art pour tous). – . mediaeval, tiles, (owen jones, racinet &c.). . tiles, cistercian monastery, bebenhausen. . moorish tiles. . gothic, tiles, bloxham church, england, th century. plate . the square panel. and . inlaid work, th or th century, sauvageot collection, (racinet). arabian mosaic, (prisse d'avennes). moorish, alhambra, th century. arabian, wood door, th century, (l'art pour tous). : the square panel. – the star-shape panel. renascence, intarsia, german (hirth, formenschatz). modern. — . renascence, intarsia, sta. maria gloriosa ai frari, venice, th century, (musterornamente). i plate . the square panel. . renascence, motive from a robe in the sacristy, sta. croce, florence, italian. renascence, tiles, collection of the count d'yvon, (racinet). renascence, motive after peter flötner, german. renascence, mosaic flooring, cathedral, spoleto, (jacobsthal; the centre altered). renascence, intarsia, stalls, certosa near pavia, italian. renascence, majolica tiles, sta. caterina, siena, italian. renascence, intarsia, door of the cambio, perugia, by antonio mercatello, , italian. – . renascence, door of the madonna di galliera, bologna, italian, (musterornamente). : ; plate . the square panel. and . wrought-iron, french, th century, (l'art pour tous). and . wrought-iron, german renascence, (hirth, formenschatz). . wrought-iron, oxford, , (l'art pour tous). – . wrought-iron, modern. and . wrought-iron, modern, cemetery, carlsruhe. . wrought-iron, by georg klain, salzburg, th century. the star-shape panel. (plate .) the decoration of polygonal stars is generally based on radiat- ing axes. exceptions, in favor of symmetry to one or two axes, are comparatively scarce (fig. ). where there is no sub-division into independent panels, accord- ing to plates and of the handbook (fig. ): the ornament follows the natural lines of division furnished by the diagonals. in this case the number of the single, similar triangles of division depends on the number of sides (fig. ). decorated star-shaped panels are extremely common in the arabian and moorish styles, where the ornament is often of such a character that it would very well suit a simple polygon, and only fills out accidentally (so to speak) the star angles (figs. , and ). enclosed ornament. , |≤ | plate . the square panel. enclosed ornament. ) wº º, i the square panel. plate . enclosed ornament. plate . the square panel. enclosed ornament. o. plate . the square panel. enclosed ornament. plate . - the square panel. enclosed ornament. plate . the star-shape panel. the star-shape panel. – the circular panel. piate . the star-shape panel. mural painting, s. francesco, assisi, (hessemer). decoration of arabic koran, th century, (prisse d'avennes). arabian architecture, (prisse d'avennes). — . arabian ceiling paintings, (prisse d'avennes). etched ornament, armour, national museum, munich, th cen- tury, (gewerbehalle). – . arabian ceiling paintings, th century, (prisse d'avennes). : the circular panel. (plates – ) the circle may be regarded as a polygon of an infinite number of sides. as it is impossible to take this infinite number into account, it is usual, when working on radial axes to divide the circle into , , , , , , , or , similar parts, as indicated in the figures. another principle of frequent application is that of division into zones; each ring-like band being ornamented independently. this principle predominates in the so-called archaic styles, e.g. on etruscan and assyrian shields (plate . , , and ). this principle is ex- cellently adapted to the decoration of dishes and plates, the profiling of which naturally points to a zonal division. the centre of the circle, which is sometimes decorated by a rosette, may also be filled by some feature which is symmetrical to one axis or is unsym- metrical (plate . ). the latter mode of decoration has also been adopted, although in comparatively rarer cases, for the decoration of the circle as a whole. geometrical sub-division of the circle, by the insertion of poly- gons, or arcs, is common, not only in gothic tracery, which is specially dependent on these processes, but in every other style (comp. the tracery panels and on plate , and the niello ornaments and on plate ). in many cases, the circular panel is decorated by an ornament which is merely an enlarged rosette or cieling- flower, so that no clear line can be drawn between the two classes, (compare what has been said of the rosette on p. ). plate . the circular panel. . assyrian, pavement, nimrud, (owen jones). . assyrian shield, khorsabad, (owen jones). . old frankish panel, sacramentarium, rheims. – . greek, paintings on wases, (lau). the circular panel. . celtic stone cross, churchyard, st. vigeans, angus, (owen jones). – . paintings on greek, wases, (lau). plate . . . plate . . plate . . the circular panel. romanesque, manuscript, th century, (racinet). modern, early gothic, (ungewitter, stadt- und land- kirchen). - byzantine, sta. sofia, constantinople, th century. mediaeval stone slab, th century, museum, rouen, (racinet). ditto, laon cathedral, (racinet). ditto, wrought-iron key-handle. gothic boss, th century, st. benoit, paris, (racinet). gothic, old cabinet, united collections, carlsruhe. and . gothic, chip-carving, old cabinet, (gewerbehalle). mediaeval glass-painting, soissons cathedral, (racinet). . the circular panel. arabian flat ornament, mosque kaonam-ed-din, (prisse d'avennes). romanesque, minster, basel. arabian bas-relief, door, cairo, th century, (prisse d'avennes). as no. . arabian bas-relief, th century, (l'art pour tous). arabian, sunk decoration, metal plaque, (prisse d'avennes). niello, baltasar silvius, th century, (ysendyck). marble mosaic, floor, s. vitale, ravenna, (hessemer). romanesque, portal, s. laurence, segovia, th century. arabian, decoration of koran, th century, (prisse d'avennes). . the circular panel. renascence, bas relief, vendramini tomb, ss. giovanni e paolo, venice, italian, (meurer). renascence, majolica tiles, sta. caterina, siena, italian. renascence, wrought-iron panel, san salvator, prague, german, (gewerbehalle). renascence, church, kamenz, german, (gewerbehalle). renascence, peter flötner, german. modern, centre of a silver plaque, by ihne and stegmüller of berlin, (gewerbehalle). modern, ceiling of staircase, villa croissy, seine et oise, french, (césar daly). and . ; meyer, handbook of ornament. enclosed ornament. plate . the circular panel. enclosed ornament. $vºs f º - tºº j-ºf- . n ſº - | ||nº|\{ t wººlwº |wºº - \ sn - (§ *yºğº sº - º) ſº the circular panel. plate . + enclosed ornament. z) º p - sº h s. Šºš º sºº - | º \%. gº º º plate . the circular panel. enclosed ornament. Ø + . % º k sº - - rºa the circular panel. - plate . the oblong panel. the oblong panel. (plates – .) the shape of the oblong is particularly adapted to receive both a bi-axial and a mon-axial treatment; and as it is by far the most fre- quently-used shape: numerous examples of the two treatments are to be found in all styles. when the oblong is not sub-divided (as shown on plates to ), the natural axes, around which the ornament is grouped are, for the bi-axial treatment, the two diameters, which join the centres of the opposite sides. these lines divide the figure into smaller oblongs, each of which receives an identical decoration (comp. plate , figs. – , and plate , figs. – ). to use the diagonals as lines of symmetry, as is the rule with the square, pro- duces an unfavourable effect; because the triangles thus formed, although similar to each other, do not present the same angle to the centre (comp. plate . ). this panel differs from the usual rule, as the organic growth of the ornament is not from the centre out- wards, but from the angles inwards. the strict greek palmette ornamentation, which has such an excellent effect in the square, is less suitable for the oblong (plate , figs. and ) than the freer decorations of the roman period (plate . ) and the renascence (plate . – ). on vertical surfaces: the attitude of the oblong panel may be either “figure-wise", or “landscape-wise". examples of the former attitude are figs. and ; and of the latter are, figs. and on plate . the vertical line through the centre is the axis of these. the ornament is seldom geometrical; organic or artificial motives are mostly used. the mon-axial treatment is most properly employed where it is applied in a really vertical plane, e.g. on pilasters (comp. p. , shafts of pilasters), on walls, doors, &c. the poly-axial treat- ment is best adapted for the decoration of horizontal planes, such as floors, ceilings, &c. copious material is furnished by the inlaid-work, bas-reliefs, and metal-work, of the renascence. plate . the oblong panel. – . greek, painted coffers of ceilings, propylaea, athens, (owen jones). . roman. . roman, under-side of the architrave, temple of vesparian, rome. . renascence, church, kamenz, german, (gewerbehalle). plate . the oblong panel. . renascence, intarsia, cabinet, perugia, italian, (jacobsthal). . renascence, palazzo vecchio, mantua, italian, (jacobsthal). enclosed ornament. the oblong panel. plate . plate . enclosed ornament. sº): Ø) l º º nº. º q º \@ º Ø º Şe * º > > the oblong panel. plate . enclosed ornament. | a plate . the oblong panel. the oblong panel. — the elliptic panel. renascence, marzuppini tomb, sta. croce, florence, (jacobsthal). renascence, tomb, stiftskirche, stuttgart, german, (musterornamente). renascence, s. michael's, schwäbisch-hall, german, (musterorna- mente). : plate . the oblong panel. . renascence, wrought-iron grill, italian, (gewerbehalle). . wrought-iron grill, choir of s. blasius, mühlhausen, thuringia, th century, (musterornamente). – . ivory inlays, by hans schieferstein, th century, museum, dresden. . wrought-iron, house, freiburg, switzerland, th century, (l'art pour tous). . ornament, over picture of saint, by barthel beham, carlsruhe, german renascence. – . stalls of the laurentian library, florence, italian renascence. plate . the oblong panel. . grill, schlettstadt, , (gewerbehalle). — . intarsia, s. petronio, bologna, , (musterornamente). . wrought-iron balaustrade, th century. . wrought-iron, french, th century. . wrought-iron, stift strahov, prague, german, renascence. the elliptic panel. (plate .) as regards the principle of decoration, the ellipse bears the same relation to the circle that the oblong does to the square. when not sub-divided (see plate , fig. ), it is treated either mon-axially, with the ornament symmetrical to one of the axes (fig. ); or it is treated bi-axially, with the ornament symmetrical to both (figs. to ). the elliptic panel was not often used in decoration during the best periods. in the th and th centuries, it was used as the form for snuff-boxes, sweet-boxes, &c., the decoration being carried-out in niello, and similar metal work. it was also in use during the same period in centre-ornaments for the covers of books. from such examples, most of the figures on the plate have been taken. plate . the elliptic panel. — . renascence, german, (formenschatz). . centre of a book-cover, gold blocking on vellum, german th century, (storck). the elliptic panel. – the lunette, and the spanrail panels. –– . renascence, book-cover blocks, germanisches museum, nurem- berg. german, (musterornamente). . renascence, pavement, tomb of princess johanna elisabeth, stiftskirche, stuttgart. the lunette, and the spanrail panels. (plates – .) the semicircle scarcely admits of any entirely satisfactory sub- division. the best method is to describe a circle in the semicircle so that the circle touches the centre of the semicircle above and the centre of its chord below; this arrangement is especially useful when a medallion or a clock is to be placed in it. there are two methods of decorating the lunette: either an upright panel-ornament is de- signed symmetrical to one axis, an arrangement which is the best, as the semicircle, in the majority of cases, is used on vertical planes (plate . and ); or the semicircle is divided, like a fan, into a number of sectors, which receive an identical decoration, an arrange- ment which is chiefly adopted for door-heads (plate . ). in such cases a central semicircle is usually inserted; and the small panel, thus formed, is decorated independently. the object of this is to obviate the inelegant and difficult accumulation of radii at the centre. in consequence of an optical illusion, the semicircle gives the impression of being really less than the half of the whole circle; and for this reason it is sometimes “stilted", that is the centre of the arc does not lie on the springing-line, but is shifted a little higher. the name “spanrail" is given to the spaces of various shape which remain after circular shapes are taken-away from quadrangular ones. the commonest figure of this kind is the trianguloid, which is formed on either side of a semicircle when this latter is described in an oblong frame. the same shape results when a circle is inscribed in a square, which frequently occurs in the decoration of ceilings. some- times the decoration of the trianguloid consists of a rosette in its centre; or laurel, palm, and oak sprays, circular wreaths, and waving ribbons, trophies, figures in relief, and similar motives, in a more or less naturalistic style, are employed. in severer decoration, the axis of symmetry is the line of bisection of the right angle. the motives are sometimes geometrical (plate . – ); but more frequently organic (plate . – ); and, among artificial forms, varieties of strapwork are used (plate . – ). when a series of arcs has a common bounding straight line, the spanrail is shaped as shown by fig. , plate . this figure is the enclosed ornament. enclosed ornament. the lunette, and the spanrail panels. plate . enclosed ornament. . - *. the lunette, and the spanrail panels. plate . the lunette, and the spanrail panels. – warious panels. same as two conjoined trianguloids. it has a vertical central axis. another well-known shape results when two smaller semicircles are taken-away from a larger, as when, for instance, two round-headed windown lights are enclosed by a common arch. finally we may mention the quadrant, which is not infrequently used in the angles of ceilings (figures and of plate ). plate . the lunette, and the spanrail panels. roman, (vulliamy). italian renascence, (gewerbehalle). arabian, (prisse d'avennes). - early gothic spanrail, stone church, england. – . arabian, mosaic spanrail, (prisse d'avennes). – . modern. : plate . the lunette, and the spanrail. panel. . renascence, intarsia, sta. maria in organo, verona, italian. wrought-iron grill. . renascence, wrougth-iron grill, german. . renascence, plinth of a column, st. antonio, padua, (meurer). modern, vaudeville theatre, paris, (raguenet). – . renascence, by vredeman de vries. the lozenge panel. (plate ) the lozenge in decorative art includes the rhombus, and the square when one of its diagonals is vertical. the lozenge is treated either as an upright panel, symmetrical to one axis (figs. , , and ); or the two diagonals are the axes of symmetry for a bi-axial pattern (figs. , and ). in the former case, the ornament consists of two; and in the latter case of four, similar parts. the lozenge is not often employed. occasionally it finds a place as a panel in lattices, doors, dadoes, ceilings, &c. plate . the lozenge panel. . door, nördlingen church, th century. – . grill, townhall, würzburg, german renascence. – . modern decorative painting. warious panels. (plates – ) plate and give a number of incidental panel-shapes, of which there is a great variety. the principle of decoration must enclosed ornament. * º §§§ *nº. nº. º/\ º Ž ae plate . enclosed ornament. l enclosed ornament. º º e. repeating ornament. (diapers) it is the essence, of repeated ornament, that it may be ex- tended on all sides at discretion, the component parts of the design (i. e. the pattern) admitting of uninterrupted repetition. the ele- ments are either geometrical, organic, or, as in the majority of cases, geometrical are combined with organic elements, sometimes with the addition of figures and artificial accessories. diaper ornament has either a poly-axial or a bi-axial character. in the former case, the decoration expands regularly on all sides; the basis is a system of inter- secting axes of symmetry, as shown in the square or triangular nets on plate . in the second case, the decoration consists of growth in an up- ward direction, the repetition on each side being secured by “turning the pattern over" symmetrically, or by juxtaposition (in the usual sense of the word). here, also, combination frequently occurs to this extent that many patterns have a poly-axial basis while single panels and medallions have upright decoration. growth in a downward direction, or in an oblique upward di- rection, &c., must be classed as exceptions to the rule. when diaper patterns are applied to circumscribed surfaces, e. g. on walls: they are either cut-off abruptly, as in wall-papers, or are stopped-short of the limits, and a border is applied. there is seldom much difficulty in the case of geometrical patterns; but with organic designs the sides of the upright patterns usually terminate at the axis of symmetry. diaper ornament is applied to many purposes. mosaic, parquetry, marquetry, using geometrical patterns; the textile, wall-paper, and repeating ornament. plate . the square diaper, &c. repeating ornament. |: < ſlº Ö ×{} > rº º sº : . qá º § d.c. º plate . the circle diaper, &c. the scale diaper, circle diaper, &c. the pigments. damaskeened objects are found in german and old frankish tombs. this art, however, disappeared in the west only to be pursued more energetically in the east, where it still flourishes, e.g. in persia, and india. niello, engraved, and etched work were most fashionable at the time of the renascence. plate . the scale diaper, &c. — . chinese and japanese. , and . indian and persian and . renascence. and . mediaeval, (cologne enamel). the circle diaper, &c. (tiles) (plate .) the decoration of walls and pavements, with glazed clay tiles, dates back as early as assyrian times. the middle ages made a most extensive use of pavement tiles. the individual tiles are mostly of a square shape; and vary in size from ins. to ins. the pattern is generally in intaglio; and fre- quently filled-in with clay of another color. the designs of these tiles are usually excellent. the tile contains either the whole of the repeating ornament; or only a part of it so that tiles form the unit of design. these tiles are common in england, france, and ger- many. majolica tiles are used in italy; and are generally adopted for the wall-decoration so popular in england. plate . the circle diaper, &c. — . various mediaeval tiles, after owen jones, racinet, and others. . fontenay, côte d'or. and . rouen museum. . cathedral, st. omer. . troyes, archives de l'aube. the circle diaper, &c. (stained glass.) (plate .) window-glazing is an introduction of the middle ages, and was unknown to the antique. coloured windows were first used for churches. the oldest process consisted in fitting-together pieces of coloured glass in the mosaic style. about the year , the prin- cipal place of manufacture was kloster tegernsee. in the th and lnghinwnmho nilwchchchh f ºf i albid $% º º sv) \!/? - º dx d}< $º º "e 㺠- d ſº § § % sº repeating ohnament. ( d - º-sº º t-ºs-ºs-º ºs- ′ . º º sººº. ºë º sql ºf s$ xs | . . [. º º º }º rºſſ io. the circle diaper, &c. plate . the circle diaper, &c – various diapers. th centuries, painting begins, followed by glass-painting strictly so-called, the design being outlined in brown paint; flashed glass, &c. followed later. after passing through a period of decadence; and almost vanishing during the last two centuries; glass-painting has, of late years, again become the object of great attention, and especially that branch which, leaving strict painting on one side, produces its most striking effects with coloured glass and leaden cames. the vigorous outlines, produced by the lead-setting, enhance the brilliancy of the colours, and prevent the unpleasant optical effect produced by the blending of contiguous tints. we have here to deal only with the ornamental decoration of snrfaces by painting or mosaic. the best examples are to be found in the transition period from the romanesque to the gothic style in the churches of germany, france, and england, the three countries which may be regarded as the true home of stained glass. plate . the circle diaper, &c. — . various patterns, romanesque and early gothic (owen jones, racinet, and others). and . chartres cathedral. and . bourges cathedral. . soissons cathedral. warious diapers. (mural painting.) (plates — .) the models and precursors of mural-decoration are to be looked- for in hangings of carpets and textiles. the egyptian style offers the earlist known examples of the decoration of surfaces by means of wall-painting. the scheme is generally a meander or similar pattern, varied by rosettes, &c. (plate . and ). the pompejan artists used figures and architectural representations in perspective instead of diaper patterns. early christian art used mosaics, which were gradually driven-out by wall-painting during the romanesque, and gothic periods. churches and public buildings are again the first edifices whose interiors were decorated by “tapestry paintings", as we may term this style of decoration in view of the mutual relation between it and textile art. with respect of the principles of design: we may refer the reader to the general introduction, page , and to the plates – . the use of wall-papers in modern times has greatly narrowed the sphere of mural painting: its principal task being now confined to the decoration of public buildings. repeating ornament. & º \º % t | º º º |: plate . repeating ornament. (Ösºzº) | º - ( \sº º º s ººs º º- ><ſfull-º j. j.j. (tuv) % ºãº, º º j lº various diapers. plate . various diapers. – . painting, old cabinet, brandenburg, beginning of the th century, (musterornamente). . painting, sta. croce, florence, italian renascence. – . painting, consistory church, assisi, th century, (hessemer). and . modern french, church painting. . painting, castle of trausnitz, landshut, end of th century, (gewerbehalle). . painting, palazzo del podestà, florence, th century, (muster- ornamente). plate . various dlapers. . ancient egyptian, meander. - . ancient egytian, ceiling painting, (racinet). — . arabian paintings, kaitbey mosque, (prisse d'avennes). . arabian mural painting, mosque of ibrahim aga, cairo, (hessemer). warious diapers. (weaving.) (plates — .) the artistic decoration of textile fabrics goes back to the very earliest times; and is of a most varied character. after the decoration of animal skins, by sewing and embroidering, came the creation of patterns in plaited mats by the use of material of various colours; and this again was followed by the different products of weaving, variegated by the use of coloured yarns, by embroidery, by print- ing, &c. it is due to the perishability of the material that scarcely any products of the loom of the older epochs are to be found in our museums; and that we can only infer their patterns from descriptions and pictures. all the richer, on the other hand, is the choice offered by the renascence, the middle ages, and the east. it would go beyond the scope of this book to give a detailed historical and technical description of textile industry; and we refer the reader to the special works and monographs on this subject”. usually the mode of decoration depends on the object, and varies with the artistic conceptions of the different styles. by the side of purely geometrical patterns (plate . and ), we find organic elements in a geometrical framing (plate . and , plate , ). by the side of poly-axial arrangements (plate . , and ), there are others with mon-axial features (plate . and ). by the side of symmetrical “turn-over" patterns (plate . ), we have others unsymmetrical (plate . ). by the side of artificial flowers and rosettes powdered * otto v. schorn, “die textilkunst". leipzig. meyer, handbook of ornament. various diapers. over the ground (plate . ), there occur natural elements like the curious japanese design on plate , fig. ; and so on. the great principle of style, in the standard examples of all periods, is the avoidance of representations of relief, or of perspective views of archi- tecture, which contradict the nature of the flat surface. important is also the proper distribution of the masses, so that distracting lines or empty spaces may be avoided. of equal importance with the design is the colour, but the plan of this work compels us to leave it out of consideration. next to the fabrication of textiles for ecclesiastical vestments and secular garments: the most important manufacture is that of car- pets, and of tapestries for use on walls, as curtains, portières, &c. of the introduction of the latter into painting, we have already spoken, on plate . here we will only refer to the tapestried backgrounds, common in pictures of the th to the th century, examples of which are to be seen in figs. and of plate . woollen and silk tapestry were followed by sheets of stamped-leather, an arabian invention, which in its turn was followed by the modern wall-paper, at first in painted single sheets, and afterwards in the printed rolls now so common. that we do not devote a special chapter of our work to this important product of modern art, is due to the fact that a difference between mural painting and textile pat- terns really only exists in the mode of manufacture, there being no essential distinction in respect of design. modern wall-papers have, on the average, a breadth of ins., on which the pattern is arranged once or oftener, according to the size of the design. the repeating of the pattern in an upward direction is partly due to technical con- siderations. in printing by hand from a wooden block, the length of the repeating pattern varies from ins. to ins. plate . various diapers. and . mediaeval textile, (gewerbehalle). . textile, th century, original in silk and gold; found in a tomb in the abbey of st. germain des prés, paris, (racinet). . patterned gold ground of altar shrine, monastery of heil- bronn, end of th century, (gewerbehalle). . patterned gold ground of altar shrine, church of st. egidius, barthfeld, (gewerbehalle). . french silk tapestry, th century, (l'art pour tous). plate . various diapers. . bishop's robe, sacristy, sta. croce, florence. . pillow pattern, tomb, st. george's, tübingen, german renascence, (gewerbehalle). repeating ornament. **. various diapers. plate . + repeating ornament. ſº n º º º % nº . º § § ſ % º º kn / º º º % Ž º ſº y stvºl. % º §º % plate . various diapers. repeating ornament. q º º n nz º º q} º sº ſº . º £ºsº - º various diapers. lace, th century, german, by hans siebmacher. . stamped-leather, book-cover, th century, (gewerbehalle). . textile, german renascence, (musterornamente). . carpet, rottweil, german renascence, (gewerbehalle). . modern japanese silk, (l'art pour tous). . painted gold ground, st. lorenzo, rottweil, end of the th century, (musterornamente). - . carpet, stiftskirche, comburg, beginning of the th century, (musterornamente). . textile, venetian picture, , berlin museum, (gewerbehalle). i warious grill diapers. (plate .) wrought-iron grills may also be treated as diapers; and railings and gratings are often treated as shown by the figures in the plate. the skeleton is formed by bars interlaced on the basis of the quadran- gular or lozenge net; the compartments being filled, either con- tinuously, or at regular intervals, with recurring ornamental accessories (figs. , , and ). another system places a repeating scroll-like ornament between parallel bars (fig. ). the straight lines of the skeleton may also be replaced by curved bars (fig. ). the material is square, round, and flat iron bars; either singly, or in combination. both the middle ages and the renascence have transmitted numerous examples in this branch; a selection is given in the plate. plate . warious grill diapers. . late gothic, choir-screen, minister, constance, th century. german renascence. italian renascence. . modern, by ende and böckmann, berlin, (gewerbehalle). german, th century. . german renascence. i a. vases, &c. b metal objects. c. furniture. d. frames, &c. e. juwelry. f. heraldry. g. writing, printing, &c. º º ie º dº | wº- s º º --- |-i". º º sº - nº. tºº" º- e * i f-r . zº - º º prefatory remarks. the third division of the handbook is entitled “decorated objects”. it is intended, firstly, to show in what manner and on what principles decoration is applied to objects, (thus complement- ing the work of the second division); and secondly, it will pass a little beyond the strict limits of aisthetics, and enter on the sphere of tectonics, in order to present a view of the construction, profiling and general plan of objects of art, e. g. vases, utensils, furniture, &c. these considerations, and the wish to be as comprehensive as possible, have necessitated the inclusion of some objects which are not decorated. this inclusion will increase the bulk of the book; but the selection of objects will be restricted, as much as possible, to those which illustrate the principles of decoration. a. v a s e s. wases, with which this division opens, are one of the most interest- ing and important of its groups. gottfried semper, who has treated keramics brilliantly in his epoch-making work “der stil”, says in the introduction to the chapter on this subject: “the products of keramic art were held in unusually high esteem by all peoples and in all periods. they had attained a religious symbolical significance long before the times of monumental edifices, which latter, indeed, were greatly influenced by the former; directly, in that keramic works served for the construction and ornamentation of the monu- ments; indirectly, because architecture took up principles of beauty and style and even finished forms which had already been developed in keramic work, and had first been fixed by the art potters of pre- architectural times".... “they are the oldest and most eloquent docu- ments of history. show us the pottery which a nation has produced, and we can in general tell what manner of nation it was and what height of culture it had attained!" professor gmelin, who, in his essay: “die urformen und gestaltungsprinzipien der töpferei” and in his work: “die elemente der gefässbildnerei", has attempted with much success to popularise semper's theories, says: “a bit of dar- winism is here unfolded in the sphere of industry: the way in which the development of man has been influenced by climate, the character of the soil, food, &c., finds its parallel in keramics in the formation of vessels as conditioned by the joint causes of aim, material, and technique". wases. mesopotamia, the use of this important implement of civilisation goes back to the very earliest times. the mural paintings of beni hassan, which have been referred to the th century b. c., show that pottery was then already known; while germany did not use pottery before the roman period; and america, previous to the arrival of europeans, was only acquainted with the formation of pots by hand, in spite of the great achievements of the peruvians. the formation of pottery by hand, is still in use in many countries. to this class belongs the building-up with zonal or spiral strips, and the moulding over plaited moulds or gourds which are then destroyed in the firing. wooden and stone moulds were used in early times; and also in modern times in connection with the wheel. at the outset, people con- tented themselves with drying the clay; afterwards drying was followed by firing. an intermediate stage is to fire beneath a covering of cow-dung, the air being excluded; when the smoke penetrates into the clay, and colours it gray or black. originally only smoothed and polished, the vessels were afterwards rendered more impervious to liquids by being painted with a warnish, such as is seen on greek vases; and by the discovery of the tin and lead glazes, such as are found on the so-called “majolica ware". the porosity, of many oriental vessels, is intentional, in order that the contents may be kept cool by the process of evaporation on the sur- face of the vessel. of the chemical composition of these ancient varnishes, we are not so well informed as we could wish. antique pottery is found in all places where ancient civilisation penetrated; but the principal sources are: greece, sicily, and italy, particularly campania and etruria. to this latter circumstance is ascribed the erroneous use of the name “etruscan", in the last century, as a collective name for antique pottery in general. athens, corinth, and chalcis, were the chief factories of pottery in greece; and ta- rentum and cumae in italy, where pottery established itself after the decay of greek art. apart from prehistoric products, it can be pro- ved that greek vase-painting begins historically in the th century b. c.; attained its golden age about b. c.; and decayed with the invasion by the romans about b. c. according to peculia- rities of form and finish, we distinguish different periods, the leading characteristics of which are as follows: — . the geometrical style: clay natural colour, yellowish-grey, rough; decoration brown, in bands, rings, zigzag lines, checks and other simple patterns, borrowed from the technique of weaving and wood carving, sometimes in connection with represen- tations of domestic animals, teams, &c., in rhythmic sequence, (compare plate . and ). . the asiatic style: clay natural color, yellowish, impregnated and smoothed; decoration dark brown, dark red, and white, wase. — fundamental wase-forms. with fantastic winged creatures, lions, panthers, geese, sphinxes, mostly arranged in zones. the intervening spaces, between the animals, are filled with rosettes, flowers, &c. the zonal deco- ration is often replaced by scales, (compare plate . ). . the black figure style: clay reddish-yellow, coloured with oxide of iron; decoration black, pure white being used for the carnations of female figures, horses, &c. the conception of the figures is frequently archaic, drawn in uncoloured com- partments bordered by ornamental bands. the lines of drapery, &c. are scratched through the black colour, to the clay. . the red figure style: clay red, very smooth: the entire vessel, with the exception of the ornaments and figures, coated black; the black sometimes having a greenish shimmer. white only occasionally found, for grey hair and the like. the tendency to simplification is predominant in respect of both ornament and figures; usually with only one figure or with simple groups of figures; outlines are painted-in with the pencil. . the painted style: clay as in no. ; the vessels frequently of colossal size (they are then not intended for practical use, as may be inferred from their having no bottom); the nume- rous red figures on the black ground are placed one over the other, with the addition of architectural decoration: technically the decoration is executed in a careless manner; dark red, white, yellow, and gold are also used; luxuriant brushwork ornament, patterns in perspective, and painted reliefs, are coiillin od. the succession of these styles, in time, is generally that of the above order; but they often blend with each other without any de- finite demarcation, forming composite styles and varieties. we find, for instance, certain drug-pots which have polychrome painting on a white background, and so on. fundamental vase-forms. (plate ) wases, as a rule, are composed of a number of simple forms or parts. these are usually the foot, the body, and the neck; to which a handle, a lid, and a spout, may also be added. the most impor- tant part is the body. in the majority of cases it determines the fundamental form of the vessel. the natural models for vessels are the hollow hand, the egg, the husks of fruits (gourds, nuts), the horns of animals, the skins of animals, and similar objects. these have, as a matter of fact, been used in all ages as models, for more the fundamental wase-forms. or less direct imitation; and were undoubtedly used by mankind in the lowest stages of civilisation, instead of artificial vessels. certain stereotyped forms recur again and again: first among them (due to the use of the potter's wheel) the form of the so-called body of revolution. an attempt is made, on plate , to give a general view of the com- monest fundamental forms, with their names. the sphere, the cylinder, and the hyperboloid, are the simplest of these. the sphere is altered, by equally flattening or extending, to the spheroid, or the ellipsoid. if these bodies be cut-away at both ends: we have the erect, and the recumbent vessel. unequal flattening and extending produce forms which we may term echinus, cake, egg, and top forms; or, if the length much exceeds the breadth: wedge, spindle, and drop forms. if only the top be cut-into: we have either the dish, or the cup form. conical, bag, and canopus forms may be derived from the cylinder. in a similar way the hyperboloid also leads to new forms. if the height of the vessel be a high multiple of the diameter, we get slender, tapering forms: in the reverse case, we have dishes and plates. the egg is the commonest form in pottery. cylindrical and conical forms, i. e. such bodies as have a developible surface, are best adapted for sheet-metal work. mathematical curves, e. g. arcs of circles, are not strictly ad- hered-to in the profiles. wessels, which are not made on the wheel, often exhibit arbitrary forms which cannot be grouped in the scheme of the plate. in the chinese and japanese styles, for example, pris- matic forms are very common (compare plate . ); human and animal shapes are found in the antique, as forms of vessels, (com pare plate . ). - the various junctions, of the body with the neck, or the foot, will produce a series of new forms. the use of double-curvature in the profile will also produce new forms, the simplest of which are the bell, and the pear. the so-called “gourd-pots”, the pilgrim-bottles, &c., also form special and rarer groups of forms. here too, may be mentioned duplex vessels formed by the juxtaposition of two vessels on a common foot, or by uniting them with a common handle. these forms are found sporadically in prehistoric and all subsequent periods. as regards the feet of vessels: we have first to remark that in the earliest times footless and three-footed vessels are by no means rare. the former were sunk in the earth, the latter would stand on an uneven surface. the usual form of foot presupposes a level stand- ing surface and therefore some degree of civilisation. intermediate, between the absence of a foot and the high foot, is the ring-foot, a fundamental wase-forms. torus or profiled circular ring, forming the lower end of the vessel. it evidently arose from the early custom of placing footless vessels in hyperboloid rings, which were afterwards incorporated with the vessel itself. the decoration of the foot is generally subordinate to that of the body; and consists of simple motives, channellings, &c. the neck receives a cylindrical, conical, or hyperboloid form, according to the object of the vessel. as experience showed that pouring-out is best done through a narrow opening, and filling through a wide one: funnel-shaped necks, intended to meet both requirements, arose. a good decoration of the neck is to surround it at its narro- west part with a neutral band, from which the motive of decoration may be developed upwards and downwards. the upper margin or mouth is either bent outwards or inwards, or is straight; the latter especially when the vessel was intended to be closed by a stopper. pouring-out is facilitated if the vessel be provided with a spout, or curved lip, as is the case with some mugs and cans. the decoration of the mouth, when round, is usually a beading or row of leaves curving downwards and outwards. the curved lip depends for its effect on the line of its curve, or, like the spout, is decorated by masks, scallops, &c. the lid generally fits into, on-to, or over, the upper margin. it may be raised by means of a knob, hoop, or ring; and if it does not lie loose on the mouth, is fastened by a hinge, or by cords and chains (censer). antique lids have sometimes the form of little vessels, or dishes. the handle varies in size, position, and number, according to the use and size of the vessel. the points of attachment of the vertical handle lie in a vertical plane; those of the horizontal handle are in a horizontal plane side by side; and those of the hoop handle are opposite each other in a vertical plane. the vertical handle is most used. the horizontal handle is specially intended for lifting; the ver- tical for tilting the vessel when pouring-out. vertical handles are most suitable for tall vessels; and horizontal handles for flat ones. other forms are produced by combination, as when a vertical handle is added to the centre of a horizontal one. as a rope was originally used instead of a handle, the latter frequently takes that form, (com- pare plate . ). if the vessel be intended for pouring-out: the handle should be so attached that the pouring-out may be done with equal ease whether the vessel be full or nearly empty. attempts have often been made to classify vessels according to their uses; but definite divisions cannot be made, as many vessels may serve for a number of purposes, which gives rise to combinations and inter- fundamental wase-forms. – the amphora. mediate groups. we mainly follow semper's classification when we divide vessels into the following groups: . holders; their chief object being storage and preservation. to this group belong: the amphora, urn, krater, dish and salver, the ampulla, the alabastron, and similar small vessels, flower-vase, salt-cellar, ink-pot, snuff-box, holy-water stoup, &c. . dippers; chiefly used for drawing and filling into other vessels. to this group belong: the hydria, bucket, spoon, and patera. . pourers; for pouring-out. to these belong: the prochotis, olpe, oinoché, lekythos, mug, can, and bottle. . drinking vessels. the principal representatives of this class are: the antique drinking vessels of the forms kylix, kantharos, kyathos, &c.; the drinking horn or rhyton, beaker, bowl, goblet, rum- mer, tumbler, and all the various forms of our modern drinking-glasses. the various vessels will be treated in this order. in many cases: one half of the cut shows the geometrical view; and the other shows the vertical section. decorative figures are fre- quently omitted, particularly on antique vases; the decoration has sometimes been omitted, when that was required by the minuteness of the scale; and sometimes it has been only partially drawn or in- dicated, in order to avoid unneccessary work. a. holders. the amphora. (plate .) the amphora is of frequent occurrence in the antique. it was intended to receive water, oil, and wine. originally serving for practi- cal purposes, it was afterwards employed merely as a show, or state vessel. the form was often revived in later styles; and has the follow- ing characteristics: erect, extended body, like an inverted egg (plate . ), a spindle (plate . ), a bag (plate . ), more rarely conical (plate . ), hyperboloid (plate . ), or cylindrical (plate . ). the neck is narrow, more or less extended, with shoulder (plate . ), or without (plate . ), thickened at the the rim. two vertical handles, diametrically opposite each other. at first without a foot (plate . – ), afterwards with a round or wases. i the most usual fundamental forms of vessels and their names. plate-shaped gt-p dish-shaped pear-shaped recumbent # ſ gd cd echinus spheroid cake-shaped t | " wedge-shaped spindle-shaped drop-shaped |- hyperboloid (\| plate . chart of fundamental wase forms. wases. ºv. the amphora. plate . meyer, handbook of ornament. the amphora. — the urn. high foot. with or without cover. material: clay, more rarely glass, or other materials. size: very variable, according to use. plate . the amphora. egyptian, with cover, thebes, thutmes iii. . egyptian, with cover, thebes, xx dynasty. . small four-sided, with latin inscription, found in egypt, unpainted clay, united collections, carlsruhe. assyrian, with rope handle, clay. roman, unpainted red clay, united collections, carlsruhe. roman, unpainted yellow clay, found near aquileia in , united collections, carlsruhe. roman, glass, with stopper, rouen, museum, (deville). roman, iridescent glass, found at pompeii. - ancient, attic, painted clay (so-called diota), munich, (lau). — . clay, painted in polychrome, with band-shaped handles, so- called alexandrian style, (lau and jacobsthal). . antique, black painted clay, (gropius). . antique state amphora, white marble, with swan handles, “vase of the athenian sosibios", louvre, paris. . modern french, state amphora, by liénard. . faun with amphora, from the painted neck of an antique drinking-horn, (compare plate . – ). : : the urn. (plate ) the urn is met-with, not only in the antique and all subsequent styles, but in early times everywhere and specially in prehistoric styles. apart from other purposes, the urn was frequently used in funeral rites, as a repository for the ashes of the dead, as a coffin, and so on. it has an erect body, profiled like an inverted egg or spindle. the neck is comparatively wide and low, the mouth straight or curved outwards, usually closed by a cover. either without feet, or with a low round foot. without handles, or with two small hori- zontal handles, attached to the greatest prominence of the body. material: clay. generally of considerable size. plate . the urn. . egyptian, rubbing an urn, (ménard et sauvageot). . prehistoric, gallic, (bosc). . grey clay, ornamentation in relief, united collections, carlsruhe. – . greek, painted clay, munich. . majolica, th century, italian. wases. plate . *. the urn. — the krater. — the basin, and dish. – . slavic, found in the district of the elbe and oder. . modern faience, bombay, (gewerbehalle). . majolica, th century, italian, (storck). . german, cut crystal, small with high foot, th century, na- tional museum, munich, (kunsthandwerk). the krater (plate ) the krater is an antique vase, chiefly used for mixing water and wine (wine was not drunk unmixed); and perhaps also for ablu- tions. although we meet with it as early as egyptian times, it is not found in antique keramic art until its later periods. as a state vessel, the krater has probably been more highly developed than any other form. modern art employs the krater preferentially as a garden vase for plants. a characteristic of the krater is its great width at the top. the body is either a hemispherical dish (fig. ), or has a wide, cup - shaped neck, (figs. and ). where the junction is formed without a shoulder: we have the bell-shaped krater (figs. and ). the foot is frequently small; and so arranged that it stands on an independent base (fig. ). two, sometimes four, or more, horizontal or vertical handles, or hints of them. the principal materials were clay, marble, and metal. kraters are usually of con- siderable size. plate . the krater. . egyptian, with lotus cups. . egyptian, thebes, xviii dynasty. – . greek, munich, (lau). . greek, with columnar handles, munich, (lau). . greek, with volute handles, (lau). . antique, uffizi, florence, (gropius). . antique, marble, with four handles, found at ostia, evi- dently copied from a metal original. . ditto, found at tivoli, england. . antique, state vase, marble, the decoration of the neck, con- sisting of figures or rich scroll ornament, is omitted. . assyrian. – . antique, for ladies' toilet, greek vase-paintings. the basin, and dish. (plate .) basins, and dishes, are vessels of such common use, that they are found everywhere, and in all periods in which the keramic art the basin, and dish. has been practised. their uses are manifold; their form is indicated by their names: dishes are the deeper, plates the shallower vessels. they occur without foot, and with a round or high foot. the last was specially adopted for the greek kylix. handles are wanting, or occur singly, or in pairs, horizontal, vertical, as hoop handles, and so on. material, and size: various. the decoration of dishes is generally on the exterior; and of plates is generally on the inner or upper face. in the latter case: the border and the centre are ornamented separately, being divided from each other by a neutral, undecorated zone, (figs. – ). to paint the entire surface with figures, dis- regarding the division of border and centre, would be contrary to correct style. plate . the basin, and the dish. . egyptian dish, with hoop handles, metal,(ménard et sauvageot). . egyptian dish, with erect handles, metal, (ménard et sauvageot). . greek dish, yellow clay, painted brown and red, geo- metrical style, united collections, carlsruhe. . view from above, of the handles of the above. . greek dish, yellow clay, ornamented with horn - like ex- crescences, painted red, geometrical style, united collections, carlsruhe. . greek dish, with high foot (kylix), yellow clay, decoration brown, geometrical style, munich, the interior is decorated with the ornament shown on plate . . . ditto. . greek, flat dish, with ring foot, munich, (lau). antique footless dish, (jacobsthal). . antique, small dish, with low foot, silver treasure, hildes- heim. . antique, metal dish, with high volute handles, (ménard et sauvageot). . roman, glass dish, with pierced handle ring, found in nor- mandy, (deville). – . majolica dish, view and section, italian renascence. – . modern glass plates, with scalloped border. . modern soup-tureen, with cover. . modern french metal dish, with vertical handle and three feet, (julienne). . modern spanish, small dish, of variegated glazed clay, malaga, united collections, carlsruhe. . modern coffee-bowl, with horizontal handles. . iiandle of no. , viewed from above. wases. the basin, and the dish. plate . the ampulla, alabastron, &c. — the flower-wase, &c. the ampulla, alabastron, &c. (plate .) the ampulla is a diminutive amphora, often in black painted clay, adorned with impressed ornament (figs. – ). the phiale is a slender vessel, without handles, with elongated body, and long narrow neck, of clay or glass (figs. – ). the alabastron has a bag-like or cylindrical body, no foot, a very narrow neck with a shoulder, a large plate-like mouth, and little ear-shaped handles (figs. – ). this vessel was intended for the reception of oils and unguents; it was made of alabaster or striped glass, whence its name. the lachrymatory, so-called from its tear-like profile, or from its purpose, is a glass vessel, of the forms shown in figs. and . not less frequent are little bag forms like the handleless vessels given in figs. , , and . like those already named, they were intended for toilet or religious purposes. plate . the ampulla, alabastron, &c. egyptian phiale, with cover, thutmes iii. antique phiale, painted clay, munich, (lau). antique glass phiale, (stackelberg). antique glass ampulla, striped bright blue and yellow. antique ampulla, black painted clay with impressed orn- aments, athens, united collections, carlsruhe. - ditto, athens. – . antique, small wessels, painted clay, united collections, carls- ruhe. – . antique glass lachrymatories, museum, nuremberg, and united collections, carlsruhe. : . antique alabastron, veined glass, imitating oriental ala. baster. . antique alabastron, milk-white glass, with brown stripes, campana collection, (l'art pour tous). . wase, white iridescent glass, campana collection, (l'art pour tous). . modern japanese, small vase, with mask handles, landes- gewerbehalle, carlsruhe. . old german, small stoneware vase. the flower-wase, &c. (plate .) flower-vase is the name given to vessels intended to receive and support bouquets of living or dried flowers. various as the forms of these vessels may be in other respects, their purpose requires that they wases. the ampulla, the alabastron, &c. plate . wases. plate . the flower-wase, &c. the flower-vase, &c. – wase-forms for various purposes. should have a funnel-shaped mouth. japan and china, which have been especially prolific in this group, use cylindrical and prismatic forms. such vessels do not possess a cover; handles, which are equally super- fluous, are also generally wanting; the decoration should avoid any attempt to imitate natural plant motives. glass, clay, and porcelain are the predominant materials. a special example of these vessels is the so-called “hyacinth-glass” intended for forcing bulbs in water. as it is desirable that the root should be visible, recourse must be had to some transparent material. decoration is excluded in the case of the ordinary flower-pot, which must admit air and moisture. this has led to the use of the decorated flower-pot, an example of which is given in fig. . the suspended flower-vase, like suspended vases in general, must be furnished with three or more handles to which the cords and chains may be attached; but it need not have a foot unless it intended to stand also. plate . the flower-vase, &c. chinese, with cloison enamel, (lièvre). modern english, in oriental style, blue glazed clay, with black ornament, landesgewerbehalle, carlsruhe. modern, glazed clay, with decoration in colours. modern italian majolica, landesgewerbehalle, carlsruhe. modern, coloured stoneware, (gewerbehalle). glass, th century. – . modern, glass. – . modern, hyacinth-glasses, (no. is patented: the upper part is made to lift out for greater convenience of pouring- : : in water). . modern, decorated flower-pot, green glazed clay. . arabian suspended lamp, enamelled glass, conventional form, (part of the ornamentation is omitted). – . modern suspended flower-vases, of glazed clay. wase-forms for warious purposes. (plate .) this plate exhibits a number of receptacles for salt and other spices, vinegar, oil, ink, &c. the name “cellar" and “stand" have little connection with the form of these vessels, which may be very various. receptacles for oil and vinegar are often called “cruets". wessels belonging to this group have not been preserved to us from the antique; but we may not conclude, from this, that salt, oil, &c., were not preserved in vessels in those days: on the contrary, some small vessels in the silver treasure at hildesheim, have been supposed wase-forms for various purposes. to be salt-cellars, though we have no definite evidence that this was so. the salt-cellar usually takes the form of a dish or bowl, some- times of a little trough or tub. the material is glazed clay, glass, porcelain, metal, &c. the renascence period created salt-cellars of rich design: the most celebrated is the famous one by cellini. with the increased use of writing, the inkstand has undergone an immense number of changes of form. the wooden inkstand, with glass lining, was in use, for a long time, till it was rendered obsolete by vessels of clay and glass. what is required of a good inkstand is: — it should not fall-over easily, and if it does should not spill; the evaporation must be reduced to a minimum; the height of the contents must be easy to regulate. to fulfil all these requirements numerous inventions have been made, some of which we will notice here. in fig. the centre of gravity lies in the foot, and this, with the form of the glass, prevents falling-over, or spilling. in fig. the level of the ink can be regulated by an india-rubber stopper. the funnel- shaped tube in which the ink rises is convenient for dipping the pen; and it reduces the evaporation. fig. shows an inkstand with sloping bottom, and revolving cover, which may be adjusted to the varying level of the ink. the form of fig. is intended to prevent falling-over, to reduce evaporation, and to maintain the level uniform for a long time; a result which is attained, notwithstanding the sim- plicity. oil and winegar cruets are usually small bottles with a shoulder. they are generally placed in pairs, in a frame (fig. ); a direct union of the two, as in fig. , is rare. the pepper-box has of late years taken the form of the pepper mill or grinder (fig. ), otherwise it is associated with the salt-cellar, and receives the same form. the inkstand and the sand-box were also often associated together; but blotting-paper renders the latter unnecessary. plate . vase-forms for various purposes. . salt-cellar, renascence, (formenschatz). . salt-cellar, german, th century. . majolica salt-cellar, italian renascence, (teirich). . spice-frame, glass, th century. . modern cruet-frame. . modern cruets, coloured glass, antique model. . modern cruet-frame. . modern peppermill. . old inkstand, wood. . modern inkstand. . inkstand, glazed clay. wases. wase-forms for various purposes. plate . wase-forms for warious purposes. . modern inkstand, with adjustible stopper. . modern glass inkstand, with sloping bottom and revolving cover. . modern glass inkstand. . old horn inkstand, for the pocket; after unscrewing the foot- piece, the metal pin may be forced into the table-top. . modern inkstand. . modern inkstand. the jar, the cist, &c. (plate .) jars and pots are small receptacles of spheroid or cylindrical form, for solid, granular, or pasty substances. the lid is either loose, or affixed by hinges; and is an essential part of the vessel. the materials are clay, porcelain, glass, wood, metal, ivory, &c. besides the small clay pots and boxes which are common in the antique: we must also mention the cist. this is a metal vessel of cylindrical form, and considerable size, which was used for religious rites, and for the reception of jewelry, rolls, &c. the style is con- ventional: there were three claws for the feet; and the exterior of the cylinder was decorated with incised figures, and furnished with rings to which chains were attached, for the transportation of the vessel. the lid is slightly domed; and the handle usually consists of two wrestlers grasping each other by the shoulders (fig. ). plate . the jar, the cist, &c. . antique, yellow clay, painted brown and red, this is the so-called “dodwell vase” celebrated as the first-discovered of the vases in imitation of the asiatic style, dug-up near corinth. . antique, yellow clay, painted red and brown, united collections, carlsruhe. . antique, with small kylix as lid, yellow clay, painted brown and red, imitating the asiatic style, munich, (lau). . antique, black clay. . antique, painted clay, belongs to the later period of the red figure style, metal ring, berlin, museum. . antique bronze cist, louvre, paris, (l'art pour tous). . modern japanese, lacquered gold and black, the lid forms a dish, landesgewerbehalle, carlsruhe. . old persian, repoussé copper, the decoration is too small to be given, (kunsthandwerk). . modern snuff-box, birch bark. . modern tobacco-jar, norwegian, carved in wood, landesgewerbe- halle, carlsruhe. . metal box, with collapsible drinking-cup, modern. wases. the jar, the cist, &c. plate . the font, and the holy-water stoup. – the hydria. the font, and the holy-water stoup. (plate .) holy-water plays an important part in many rites of the roman catholic church. it is kept in holy-water stoups. these are bowls, either free, or attached to walls. in the former case, the form generally approaches that of the krater; in the latter case, the edge projects as a half or three-quarter circle from the surface of the wall; and the stoup is supported on a pilaster, column, or console. for use in houses: the stoup takes the form of a suspended dish, as shown by fig. . the decoration is mostly symbolic, e. g. crosses, monograms, cherub-heads, &c. most of the examples are taken from the work by raguenet, which contains a large selection of these objects. plate . romanesque, minster, weissenburg, (raguenet). romanesque, church of the crucifix, compiègne, (raguenet). romanesque, church, picardy, (raguenet). romanesque, church, charleville, (raguenet). th century, (viollet-le-duc.). th century, church, mas d'azil, ariège, (raguenet). th century, church, cormontreuil, (raguenet). church, picardy, (raguenet). modern, church, couthuin, belgium, architect halkin, (raguenet). th century, chapel of the castle, mello, france, (raguenet). th century, beaten silver, royal museum, stuttgart, (kunst- handwerk). i b. dippers. the hydria. (plate .) the hydria, as its name implies, is the water-pot. it is the vessel which the maidens took to the spring; filled with water; and then bore home on their heads. it was carried, when empty in a horizontal; and when full, in a vertical attitude. of all vases: it is the most perfect in form; its aim being so well expressed in its con- struction. it must be easy to carry, convenient to fill and empty, and to hold as much fluid as possible; it therefore has a vertical body of the shape of an inverted egg (this form places the centre of gravity at the top, which facilitates transportation in a vertical attitude); on which a funnel-shaped neck is placed. it has three handles: two are horizontal, diametrically opposite to each other at wases. the font, and the holy-water stoup. plate . meyer, handbook of ornament. the hydria. — the bucket, &c. the greatest protuberance of the body, which served to raise the vessel when full; the third is vertical, placed on one side of the neck, which served to carry the vessel when empty, to steady it when full and when pouring-out. the foot is always small. the neck has a shoulder, or blends in a curve with the body. a special kind of the latter treatment is the kalpis (fig. ). the smaller, slenderer hydrias, which were not intended to be carried on the head, are termed hand-hydrias. the material is clay. plate . the hydria. . greek, (jacobsthal). . greek, of the kalpis form, body smooth, black, painted with red figures on the shoulder. . greek, painted black, reddish brown and white on the clay ground, campana collection, louvre, paris, (l'art pour tous), the decoration is of the highest class, the shoulder is decorated by an ivy band, which is omitted in this figure, but given on plate . . – . graeco-italic hand-hydrias, unpainted clay, united collections, carlsruhe. – . greek vase-paintings, showing the mode of carrying and using the hydria. the bucket, &c. (plate ) we have seen that the hydria gives beautiful expression to the idea of pouring-out; the bucket, on the other hand, is distincly a dipper, and the funnel a filler. the bucket is of specifically egyptian origin; with it water was drawn from the nile; and hence the drop-like form, with the centre of gravity low down. two such buckets were carried on a yoke. the form serving to prevent spilling, (figs. – ). the assyrian bucket generally terminates below in a lion mask, from which the bag-shaped neck rises, (fig. ). in the graeco-italic style, we find footless buckets resembling an inverted egg (fig. ); others with a ring foot are, however, not uncommon, (figs. , , and ). instead of one hoop handle there were sometimes two (figs. and ). the ecclesiastical art of the middle ages gave its portable holy- water stoups the form of buckets, modifying the shape of the latter to fit them for this purpose (figs. , ). sometimes the bucket is furnished with a spout, or a nozzle (fig. ). the funnel, as a rule, takes the shape of an inverted cone, with or without a tubular continuation; the handle is vertical (figs. , ), wases. the hydria. plate . % the bucket, &c. — the spoon, &c. hoop-shaped (fig. ), or two horizontal double (fig. ). a water- ing pot is shown in fig. : the hole at the top is intended to let the water flow when opened, or to stop the flow by atmospheric pres- sure when closed by the finger. metal, as the more durable material, is generally used for buckets and funnels: clay, glass, &c., are less common. plate . the bucket, &c. . egyptian, thebes, tutmes iii. — . egyptian, bronze. . egyptian bucket-like wessel, without handle. . assyrian, with cord handle. – . graeco-italic, bronze, of various forms. . antique, with hoop handle, red clay, painted black, united collections in carlsruhe, the eye in the uppermost zone, which is found in greek keramics, has been explained as a protective against the “evil eye”. – . mediaeval, beaten copper, th century, (viollet-le-duc.). . modern italian, clay, with hoop-handle and nozzle, (gropius). – . modern coal-vases, sheet-metal, square and round. . antique clay funnel. . mediaeval vessel, for watering the ground, clay, (viollet-le- duc). . modern funnel, for watering the ground, sheet-metal. . general form of the modern sheet-metal funnel. the spoon, and the ladle. (plate ) spoons and paterae form a special class of dippers. as the table-spoon, strictly so-called, will come up for discussion among the utensils, we have here to consider only the larger spoon-shaped vessels and the paterae (handled dishes) used for religious and other purposes. the natural model of the spoon is the hollow hand, whence the spherical, elliptical, or oval dish-shape, with an attached handle. the latter usually lies in the plane of the rim, but it may also form an obtuse angle with it, or, as in the case of the antique simpulum (fig. ), a right-angle. egyptian spoons, which are richly decorated, often possess a cover rotating round a pin (compare the projections on the dish, fig. ), the spoon then becomes a kind of pot or receptacle. a foot is of course superfluous on the ordinary spoon; but the paterae with handles not infrequently have a ring- foot to enable them to stand (figs. – ). the spoon and the paterae may also be furnished with a special spout or lip (fig. ). wases. the bucket, &c. plate . the spoon, &c. — the prochotis, &c. as a rule: the dish is plain, or is slightly decorated by engraving the interior, (fig. ). the decoration is generally confined to the rim and the handle, or its points of junction. the material is usually wood, bone, or metal. the size varies with the use. plate . the spoon, and the ladle. – . egyptian spoons, plainly or richly finished, partly painted. . assyrian spoon-like wessel. . antique bronze patera, with lip. , , . antique bronze paterae, seen from the side, from above, and below. . antique terracotta patera. – . antique simpula. . antique spoon - like vessel, bronze, united collections, carlsruhe. . antique cooking wessel, like a handled dish, (ménard et sauvageot). c. pourers. the prochous, the oinochoe, the olpe, &c. (plate ) we commence the series of pourers with the antique forms of the prochoiis, oinochoë, olpe, &c. as the definition of these appella- tions is not yet finally settled: it will be best to leave the various intermediate forms entirely unnamed. the vessels were used partly for secular, partly for religious purposes. thus the prochotis is the sacrificial vessel from which the libations of wine were poured-out, into the patera. the oinochoë is believed to have been a secular wine jug; and the olpe to have been a receptacle for oil, &c. all these vessels have this in common: that the mouth is wavy, elongated to a channel on one side, or pinched-in at the sides, to form a large spout and facilitate the pouring-out. the older vessels, in particular, show great boldness in thus making the form of the mouth different to the circular plan which is a result of the use of the potter's-wheel; but in the later times there was a return to the simpler and more beautiful shape. the prochotis and the oinochog generally have an upright body, in shape like an egg. the olpe invariably has a cake or bag-shaped body, a form which is occa- sionally found in the prochotis. the vertical handle is raised above the vessel and is attached in a bold sweep to the side opposite the lip. the foot is usually ring-shaped. bronze and clay are employed the spoon, and the ladle. plate . the prochotis, &c. — the lekythos, &c. as materials. the prochods and oinochos are, generally, vessels of considerable size, while the olpe is smaller. plate . the prochočs, the oinochoe, the olpe, &c. . greek procholis, archaic form and ornamentation, painted clay. . greek prochotis, geometrical style, red clay, painted black. . greek cyprian wessel, geometrical style, yellow clay, painted brown, munich, (lau). . greek oinochoë, asiatic style, yellow, painted clay, (semper). . antique small vessel, yellow clay, painted black, united collections, carlsruhe. . antique small vessel, clay, painted black, engraved orna- ment, united collections, carlsruhe. – . greek wessels, painted clay. . greek bronze wessel, collection of herr von pulsky, pesth. . graeco-italic bronze wessel. prochotis in the form of a female head, museum, rome. – . antique olpe, painted clay. . antique bronze olpe, museum rome. the lekythos, &c. (plate .) the lekythos is a small antique pourer, employed sometimes in the toilet as a receptacle for oils and unguents, and sometimes in funeral rites, to be placed with the deceased in the grave. the form is generally elongated, cylindrical or spindle-shaped, more rarely bag-like or spherical. the foot is a plain ring foot, the neck long and narrow with a shoulder. the handle rises from the body up to the upper end of the neck. as regards form and decoration, these pretty vessels form special groups. the slender forms are the older, the spherical and depressed the later. upright palmettes, as shown in fig. , are a characteristic decoration. the material is clay. plate . the lekythos, &c. – . greek, red clay, painted black, united collections, carlsruhe. – . greek, red clay, painted black. - . greek, painted black and white, later period. . greek, attic style. . ditto. – . greek, red clay, painted black, united collections, carlsruhe. . greek, red clay, painted black and white, munich, (lau). wases. the prochotis, the oinochoë, the olpe, &c. plate . the lekythos. – the lip-spout pitcher. . greek aryballos (perfume vase), united collections, carls- ruhe. . greek aryballos, painted black, united collections, carlsruhe. . greek, perfume-vase, with hoop handle, painted black, united collections, carlsruhe. . greek lekythos, later period, united collections, carlsruhe. the lip-spout pitcher. (plates – ) the want of some uniform nomenclature makes itself felt not only in the case of antique vessels, but also with such colloquial expressions as “pitcher”, “jug”, “pot”, “can”, “bottle", &c., which include a great variety of forms, so that what one calls pitchers and pots another calls jugs and cans. to maintain at least some kind of system in this handbook, we class all vessels with vertical handles, (unless they belong to some special category), as “pitchers" if they have the usual mouth with a lip; and as “pots" if they have a pipe- like spout. the material and size, of the pitcher vary greatly, according to its purpose and period. the principal representatives are the ewers, and jugs, of glass, clay, stoneware, and metal. plate . the lip - spout pitcher. . egyptian, with saucer, recalling our modern ewers and basins. . antique iridescent glass, germanisches museum, nuremberg. . antique glass, found in trouville-la-rivière, normandy, (deville). . antique glass, found near mainz, united collections, carlsruhe. roman, glass, from a grave at bingerbrück, wiesbaden museum. antique, blue glass, louvre, (deville). like no. . . antique, yellowish green glass, germanisches museum, nuremberg. . like no. . . antique, glass, found in rouen, d century a. d., rouen museum, (deville). . antique ring-shape, unpainted clay, united collections, carlsruhe. . roman-alemannic, red clay, found in käferthal near mannheim, united collections, carlsruhe. . antique (?) bronze, with cover, found at saumur, (ménard et sauvageot). . ancient american, grey clay, time of the incas, excavated at trujillo in peru, (the round compartment of the body is fan- tastically adorned with figures), united collections, carlsruhe. . vases. the lekythos, &c. plate . wases. l- -- plate . the lip-spout pitcher. wases. the lip-spout pitcher. plate . the lip-spout pitcher. — the pipe-spout pot. . old german, bohemian glass. . modern hungarian, glazed clay, landesgewerbehalle, carlsruhe. plate . the lip-spout pitcher. . italian faience, glazed in colours, th century, the blue lilies on a gold ground are the coat of julius iii., cluny museum, paris, (l'art pour tous). . german, by hans holbein, th century, (hirth, formen- schatz). . old german, stoneware, with disc-shaped body. . german renascence, pewter, (hirth, formenschatz). – . old german, stoneware, the decoration is omitted. . modern stoneware, with tin cover, by dir. kachel. modern majolica, carlsruhe. — . modern, stoneware. – . modern, green and blue glass. the pipe-spout pot. (plate .) as already remarked, we group here all those one-handled pourers which possess a separate spout or mouth. here too, material, size, and form are very various. distinct categories are formed by the state- jugs of metal, such as were in use at the period of the italian renascence (fig. ), the oriental metal jugs, the venetian small glass jugs, milk, coffee, tea and watering pots, &c. where a spout occurs: it is generally attached at the lower part or middle of the body, more rarely towards the top; and usually reaches to the level of the mouth. the spout generally tapers in an upward direction; its orifice is some- times a mask or a widened mouth-piece; in the case of the watering- pot it is furnished with a rose. the handle is vertical, or a hoop. noteworthy is the long stump-handle of some modern coffee-pots (fig. ). the vessels of this group frequently have a lid. piate . the pipe-spout pot. . italian renascence, state-jug, metal, design by polidoro caravaggio, uffizi, florence. . japanese, enamelled metal, louvre, (l'art pour tous). . arabian, metal, th century, cluny museum, paris, (l'art pour tous). – . venetian glass, th century, (hirth, and l'art pour tous). . modern oriental, unglazed clay, from jerusalem, united collections, carlsruhe. wases. the pipe-spout pot. plate . the pipe-spout pot. — the bottle. . oriental tea-pot, painted china. . milk-ewer, painted faience, th century, united collections, carlsruhe. . modern coffee-pot. modern tea-kettle, metal, hoop handle, with wooden guard. — . modern watering-pots, sheet metal. the bottle. (plates — .) the bottle has a spherical, elongated, or bag body; and an elongated, narrow neck, which usually expands like a funnel towards its upper extremity, and is sometimes closed by a stopper. bottles have either a ring foot or no foot at all, high feet are exceptional. handles are seldom attached; where this is done, they appear in pairs. in the case of pocket-flasks, which are usually of a disc or watch shape, the handle serves to attach the flasks to a cord or belt. the material is chiefly glass; but clay and metal are also used. the bottle form has been specially cultivated in the east, in persia, china, japan, &c. a natural model is frequently found in the calabash, which is itself often used as a wessel. plate . the bottle. — . egyptian, front and side view. . antique, small watch-shaped perfume-bottle, blue and white glass, with handles for suspension, like a hunting-flask, cam- pana collection, (l'art pour tous). . antique, glass, with handles for suspension, (deville). . antique, perfume-bottle, transparent emerald green glass. . antique, campana collection, (l'art pour tous). . antique, two-handled, iridescent glass, campana collection, (l'art pour tous). . antique, iridescent glass, united collections, carlsruhe. . antique, iridescent glass, united collections, carlsruhe. . old german, glass, from the spessart, (friedrich, die alt- deutschen gläser). . modern, cut glass, dresden, (gewerbehalle). . modern, green glass, with ring stopper. . modern, yellowish green glass. . modern, “florentine flask", covered with bast. plate . the bottle. . egyptian, without foot, two rope handles for suspension. . antique, red, unpainted clay, united collections, carlsruhe. wases. º meyer, handbook of ornament. the bottle. plate . wases. plate . the bottle. the bottle. — drinking wessels. . antique, hammered bronze, with cover and ring, castellani collection. . ditto, united collections, carlsruhe. – . japanese, bronze. . persian, clay. – . modern, egyptian, unglazed gray clay, united collections, carlsruhe. . chinese, blue porcelain, (lièvre). . persian, damaskeened metal, (l'art pour tous). . wrought-iron military flask, holding pints, th century, cluny museum, paris. . modern hungarian military flask, colored glazed clay, landes- gewerbehalle, carlsruhe. . majolica, colored plastic ornamentation, modern english, landesgewerbehalle, carlsruhe. . modern, french, green glazed clay. d. drinking wessels. plates — show drinking vessels. drinking vessels are as ancient as drinking itself; and they are consequently found in every style. their forms and kinds are infinitely various; especially in the antique, the middle ages, and the renascence. semper says on this point: “athenaeus gives us the names and descriptions of more than a hundred drinking vessels, although he confines himself to those of the precious metals, which, long before his time, had replaced earthen- ware drinking vessels among the greeks. the same variety rules in the drinking vessels of the middle ages; and although, in this branch too, our poverty of invention is obvious, compared with the earlier fecundity; still, an enumeration of the different forms and kinds of drinking vessels now in common use would be fairly extensive; and would be all the more difficult inasmuch as our modern time does not adhere to typical forms; or, more correctly speaking, has lost all idea of what a type is. nowhere is the influence of caprice, and heedless confusion of forms more conspicuous than in this class of vessels; so that any attempt to classify drinking vessels, and to enumerate the subdivisions which have existed and still exist, can meet with little success. but if we disregard “freaks” and those anomalous forms of drinking vessels, which have been evolved more by the influence of fashion, and caprice than by the intended use, we shall find that the distinctions which we found to be true for the - * drinking wessels. – the kylix, the kantharos, &c. forms of vessels in general, are applicable to drinking vessels in particular". notwithstanding this, we will attempt to classify the forms of drinking vessels. this will be done, partly according to style, placing the commonest antique forms on one plate, specifically old german forms on another, and the drinking vessels of our own time on a third. partly, too, we will place, on other plates, definite groups which have either an identical fundamental form or a common object, regardless of their belonging to the same or to different styles, e. g. drinking- horns and rhytons, cups and beakers, chalices and goblets, state-cups, rummers, mugs, and tankards. the kylix, the kantharos, &c. (plate .) drinking vessels of clay and the precious metals, played the chief, part in antique times, while glass, which was employed for other purposes, was only occasionally used. e a very common form is the two-handled dish or kylix, with a low or high foot. both the form and the name of the later calyx and our chalice are derived from kylix. when formed of clay, the kylix is a plain shallow dish, ornamented on the under side, some- times with figures on the inner side, and with two horizontal handles (figs. – ). in metal, the form becomes richer, the handles are elongated and bolder in curvature (figs. – ). the fundamental form of the kantharos is that of the deep dish or krater, with two vertical handles. the decoration is only external; the simplicity in clay (fig. ), passes into richness when metal is em- ployed (figs. — ). bacchic attributes, the vine, ivy, the thyrsos, masks, &c., from the decoration. the kyathos, a dipper and drinking vessel at once, is a dish with the handle elongated vertically and sometimes replaced by a straight handle, which gives the vessel somewhat of the appearence of a spoon (figs. , , ). - the skyphos is a dish with two horizontal handles (figs. ); the kothon (fig. ), is the military drinking vessel, “a vessel with a broad rim bent inwards, out of which one could only drink by bending the neck right back; but it was convenient for dipping water from brooks, and the in-curved rim caught the impurities of the water so that they remained behind both in dipping and drinking", (semper). - we might further adduce the deinos, the drinking vessel of hercules, the amphikypellon, a double beaker mentioned by homer, the kalathos, and others. but the examples selected above may suffice. wases. the kylix, the kantharos, &c. plate . the kylix, the kantharos, &c. — the rhyton. plate . the kylix, the kantharos, &c. . antique kylix, painted clay, museum, naples. . the same vessel, viewed from below. . greek kylix, bronze, found in sarcophagus at cephalonia, (stackel- berg). . greek kylix, bronze, found in ithaca. . antique kantharos, black painted clay, united collections, carls- ruhe. . antique kylix, beaten silver, hildesheim treasure, museum, berlin. . antique kantharos, beaten silver, found at berthouville near bernay, bibliothèque nationale, paris. . antique kyathos, black painted clay, united collections, carlsruhe. . antique kyathos, painted clay, united collections, carlsruhe. . antique skyphos, metal, (ménard et sauvageot). . antique skyphos, painted clay. . antique kothon, painted clay, united collections, carlsruhe. the rhyton. (plate .) the primaeval custom, of using the horns of animals as drinking vessels, led to the drinking-horn. the antique is not alone in creating, in the rhyton, a special kind of these vessels: in the middle ages and in modern times, in england and germany, drinking-horns are well known. in view of the varied and often complicated forms of these latter, we shall confine ourselves to presenting some antique examples. the form of the rhyton was that of an animal's head, with the addition of a handle. as a rule, it has no foot; and cannot be set down. when pierced at the lower end, it could be drunk-from in the manner, shown in fig. . stags, asses, swine, vultures, &c. were utilised as models, whence the special names elaphos, onos, kapros, gryps, &c. sometimes the human head was used, (fig. ). the vessel is modelled naturalistically; and receives a painted decoration on the neck alone. the material is clay. plate . antique, (tragelaphos) with a ram head. antique, with a human head. antique, (kapros) with a swine head. antique, (elaphos) with a stag head, (semper). – . antique, (hippotragelaphos) on one side a ram, on the other an ass head. - : wases. plate the rhyton. the rhyton. — the cup, and the beaker. — the chalice, and the goblet. r- . antique, (gryps) with vulture head. – . antique drinking-horn, with lion mask as spout. . antique state rhyton, marble, vatican museum, rome. . picture from an antique vase, showing the manner of drink- ing from the rhyton. the cup, and the beaker. (plate .) drinking vessels of these forms are of very general occurrence. they may be hemi-spherical, cylindrical, like an inverted cone, or of a mixed shape; without foot, with a ring foot, or supported on balls; without a handle, or with one, two, or more handles. the use of the cup restricts it to a certain size; the material is metal, glass, clay, stoneware, &c. richly-decorated cups have come down to us from the antique, and the renascence. plate . the cup, and the beaker. . assyrian, from a relief. . assyrian, painted clay. . antique, silver, parcel gilt, found on ithaca. . antique kalathos, found in athens. . antique, clay, painted black, united collections, carlsruhe. . antique, red clay, painted black, united collections, carlsruhe. . antique, beaten silver, found in pompeii, now in naples. . antique, originally decorated in sunk enamel, hildesheim treasure, berlin, museum. . antique, beaten silver, hildesheim treasure, berlin, museum. . antique, green glass, found in normandy, (deville). . antique, glass, (deville). . old german, glass. . venetian, glass, british museum. . old german, stoneware. . old german, stoneware. . german renascence, metal, with bosses and ball foot. the chalice, and the goblet. (plate .) these are deep vessels of the form of half an egg, without handle, and with a high foot. the form was chiefly used in the middle ages, and renascence; for both secular and religious purposes. for the former purpose, the material is glass or metal, and the size is wases. w w plate . the calice, and the goblet. the chalice, &c. — the hanap. various; for the latter purpose, the chalice is invariably of metal, mostly of silver chased and gilt, enamelled, set with jewels, &c. in the romanesque style, the cup is hemispherical and shallow; in the gothic style and the renascence, it becomes deeper. plate . the chalice, and the goblet. . egyptian, thebes. . antique, red clay, united collections, carlsruhe. . antique, clay, painted black. . romanesque chalice, chased silver set with jewels, willingen church. . gothic chalice, chased silver, wertheim church. . silver state-goblet, german, th century; this goblet, along with two others, is said to have been the model for the master- pieces of the goldsmiths; and is usually attributed to the nurem- berg goldsmith jamnitzer, although this has lately been doubted; the bossed outline is copied from the flower of the columbine (aquilegia vulgaris), municipal collection, nuremberg. . crystal goblet, with cut ornaments, th century, national museum, munich, . venetian glass goblet, th century, british museum, (l'art pour tous). . modern champagne-glass, landesgewerbehalle, carlsruhe. . old german glass goblet, th century. . old german glass goblet, th century. the hanap. (plate ) the same blending of forms which the reader will have ob- served in the treatment of cups and goblets occurs in the case of hanaps. ordinary colloquial language makes no definite distinction between them. a state-cup presupposes a considerable richness of decoration, it is usually a cup or goblet-shaped product of the gold- smith's art, provided with a cover, or it may even be a richly finished glass of similar form. plate . the hanap. . design, by hans holbein, german, th century, (formen- schatz). . design, german, th century, (formenschatz). . design, nd half of the th century, the cover makes an in- dependent cup, (musterornamente). wases. plate . the hanap. wases. plate . the römer or rummer. wases. plate . various drinking wessels. various glasses. warious glasses. (plate .) the plate contains a selection of other old german drinking vessels. what manifold varieties of drinking glasses existed, in the th century, for instance, may be seen in fischart's romance “gar- gantoa and pantagruel", which is sociologically so interesting. in the eight chapter, entitled “a conversation on drinking", he says: “da stachen sie eymander die pocal auff die prust, da flogen die mihele, da stibeten die römercken, da raumt man die dickelbächer, da soffen je zween und zween aus doppleten, die man von eymander bricht, ja soff aus gestifleten krügen, da stirzt man die pott, da schwang man den gutruff, da trähet man den angster, da riss und schält man den wein aus potten, aus kelchen, napffen, gonen; hoffbechern: tassen: trinkschalen: pfaffenmasen: stauffen von hohen stauffen: kitten: kälten: kanuten: köpffen: knartgen: schlauchen: pipen: nussen: fiolen: lampeten: kufen: nüsseln: seydeln: kilkesseln, mälterlin: melkgelten, spitzmasen, zolcken, kannen, schnāulzemmas, schoppen- kännlein, stotzen: da klangen die gläser, da funckelten die krausen.” we here offer a few forms, some of them named in the above descrip- tion of fischart's. - the name angster is applied to a high narrow-necked drinking bottle (from the latin angustus, narrow). the neck, which rises out of a spherical, bulbous body, often consisted of , , or more tubes wound round one another, frequently bent to one side and broadening at the top into a cup-like mouth (fig. ). these glasses belong to the category of puzzle-glasses, to extract the wine from which was a matter of “anguish". semper's observation is very true for such puzzle-glasses: “it would really seem as if fashion and the toper's humor of the competitors, in drinking-bouts with obstacles, had spe- cially invented forms of vessels which demanded a most uncomfortable and ingenious mode of drinking.” the gutrolf (gutterer, kutrof, perhaps from the latin gutturnium), seems to have been a similar glass with a straight neck (figs. and ). the spechter (presumably from spessart) is a tall, narrow, cy- lindrical glass with a low foot, decorated with bosses, scrolls, &c. (figs. , ). the passglas (peg-tankard) resembles the spechter, but is divided by rings into equal divisions which served as a scale in drinking bouts. it often bears painted figures, inscriptions &c., (figs. , ). “ the form of the cabbage-stalk glass in sufficiently indicated by the name (fig. ). the tummler and handtummler (tumbler) are glasses without “aet, which totter when set down; and if laid on their side at once various glasses. – the mug. resume a vertical position (figs. , ); as also glasses like that shown in fig. , which must first be drunk empty before they can be set down. to those times also belonged: puzzle-glasses from which the liquor had to be sucked - out at the end of the handle (fig. ); vessels in the shape of ladies (figs. – ), and of fantastic animals. it would carry us too far to enter upon the details of manu- facture: we therefore refer the reader once more to c. friedrich's “altdeutsche gläser”. plate . warious drinking wessels. green cabbage-stalk glass, germanisches museum, nuremberg. — . old german peg-tankards, painted. — . old german spechters. kutrolf (angster), th century, bavarian gewerbemuseum, nuremberg. – . old german angsters, no. in the bavarian gewerbe- museum, nuremberg. . kutrolf (angster) with winding neck. . puzzle-mug, (friedrich). – . old german glasses, in the form of ladies, no. in the bavarian gewerbemuseum, nuremberg. . large tumbler, th century, with metal handle; in the original a figure of mercury stands on the ball, bavarian gewerbemuseum, nuremberg. . painted glass tumbler, (friedrich). . hungarian coronation glass, painted. : the mug. (plate .) in accordance with its purpose, the form of the mug is essen- tially different from that of other drinking vessels. the body usually has a cylindrical form, and is without a foot, or with only a ring foot. a movable lid of metal, mostly tin, is attached by a hinge to the vertical handle, in order to keep the liquid as fresh as possible, in view of the great surface of evaporation. for the same reason the material is preferably stoneware. that glass has of late years been p 'eferred to stoneware, is due to the fact that the liquid is visible and more easily investigated in glass vessels; and that these are more easily cleaned. compared with the wine-glass, the mug will always have a greater circumference, and show a more robust treatment. the hinge must be so attached that when the lid is wide open, it forms an obtuse angle with the rim. meyer, handbook of ornament. wases. the mug. plate . ' the mug. — the tankard. — modern drinking glasses. plate . the mug. . renascence mug (schnelle), stoneware, german. . renascence mug, chased silver, regensburg treasure, (ge- werbehalle). . old german beermug, brown glass, painted, bavarian ge- werbemuseum, nuremberg. , , . old german stoneware beermugs. . old german glass beermug. renascence mug, amber, mounted with silver, grünes ge- wölbe, dresden. — . modern stoneware beermugs, from old patterns. . modern beermug, brown glass, with green bosses. the tankard. (plate .) the tankard is a drinking vessel, more or less coarse in shape like a cylinder or an inverted cone; and made of glass, stone- ware, &c. the name is also given to vessels of more architectural pretensions, like that in fig. . the tankard is less for individual than for social use; and is intended chiefly for beer, hence its size and robust form. of special importance are the eagle, imperial, electoral, and guild tankards of the renascence period. plate . the tankard. . roman glass, of tankard form, found in pompeii, (deville). . ditto, (ditto). . old german green glass tankard, (compare this form with that of the rummer on plate ). . ditto. – . old german glass tankards. . old german armorial tankard, (friedrich). . modern brown glass tankard. . moderu brown glass tankard, painted, (keller-leuzinger). modern drinking glasses. (plate ) great laxity is apparent in the forms of modern drinking vessels. alongside coarse forms in transparent blown and cast glass: delicate glasses, cut and etched, appear in the market. of late years old examples of coloured glass have been frequently copied, with * : wases. the tankard. plate . wases. ... - . modern drinking glasses. plate . modern drinking glasses. more or less skill and intelligence. it is to be hoped that the general revival of applied art will lead to the attainment of high- class results in this branch also. plate . modern drinking glasses. – . various modern glasses for water, wine, and beer, of white and coloured glass. plates — present some different classes of vessels in nearly specimens. . but even this copious material was far from permitting every form to be taken into consideration. the first place was accorded to definite groups and to conventional, ever-recurring shapes; while the arbitrary, sporadic, accidental, and barocco, were excluded. still, it is possible that we have not succeeded in giving a general view of the group of pottery and vessels. readers who desire to pursue their studies further are referred to the special works and periodicals dealing with this subject. b. metal objects. - (utensils) utensils are very various; and an exhaustive treatment of them is quite impossible within the scope of this handbook. beside this, decoration is quite excluded in many cases. still, definite divisions of this group have been created by the fact, that their representatives in certain periods have received artistic treatment; and hence they may be reduced to a system. although, on the one hand, a number of utensils have found no place on the plates devoted to this group: we have, on the other hand, been able to form a number of subsidiary divisions, each com- plete in itself. thus, for example: chapters — will deal with the interesting subject of utensils for illumination, chapters – with the utensils of ritual, chapters — with the utensils of war and hunting, chapters — with those of the table, and chapters — with a variety of household and toilet utensils, tools, &c. a. utensils for illumination. utensils of illumination, both for religious and household use, are extremely numerous. great attention and artistic finish have been lavished upon them in all styles; and especially in the antique. we need only mention the candelabra of the antique and the renas. cence, greek lamps, the chandeliers of the middle ages, &c. the candelabrum. the forms and the finish of the different utensils have changed along with the radical changes which the mode of illumination has undergone in the course of time. oil, lamp-light, candle, torch-light, gas-light, and our latest achievement, the electric light, all demand special, different forms of bearers, and apparatus. the predominant material would seem to be metal; and, next to this, clay, and glass; while imflammable materials like wood are, by their very nature, almost excluded. here, too, it is proper to call attention to a difference which must be borne in mind between antique and modern illuminating utensils. the difference is this: that whereas the antique with all its artistic perfection, is very defective from a practical point of view; modern apparatus, while surpassing the antique in the matter of technical adaptation to its purpose, scarcely ever reaches the antique beauty, and generally falls below it. we will consider the candelabrum, the antique lamp, the different kinds of standard, hand, and bracket candlesticks, hanging lamps, lanterns, chandeliers, and modern lamps; taking them in this order. the candelabrum. (plates – ) the candelabrum (from candela = candle) was, as its name in- dicates, originally intended to carry a candle. but as candle-light, like the illumination by means of torches and pitch-pans, gradually receded before the use of lamps in antique times, and was more and more reserved for the purposes of ritual; the antique cande- labrum came to be employed as a lampstand or lampadarium. hence it comes that the upper end of a candelabrum is furnished sometimes with a bowl, sometimes with a pricket or socket to receive the candle, sometimes with a flat disc, and, sometimes with project- ing clips and hooks to hold the lamp or to suspend it from. the last is the most frequent form. the great state-candelabra, for religious observances, have bowls; and are made of marble. the shaft of such a roman candelabrum of conventional form is given on plate , fig. . candelabra for household use were made of bronze. in height: they are of two different dimensions, according as they were meant to stand on the ground, or on a table. the former are of an extremely slender construction (plate . ), of an average height of feet to ft. ins. the form of the latter class (candelabrum humile) is less slender (plate . and ), and the extreme height is about ft. ins. the design of the antique candelabrum is either of architectonic character, or free and natura- the candelabrum. listic. we have already mentioned, in chapters – , that in the former case: the base, shaft and bowl, are generally decorated. the second class includes standing and sitting figures, behind which the shaft of the candelabrum rises, or by which it is borne (plate . and ); or of bearers in the form of trees, beneath which figures or groups are seated (plate . ). occasionally examples are found so arranged that they can be taken apart and adjusted to different heights (plate . ). the majority of the antique bronze cande- labra which have been preserved to us are of etruscan origin. plate shows seven different examples selected from the copious material. plate . the antique candelabrum. . antique, bronze stand from which to suspend lamps (lychnucus, lampadarium), found in pompeii, berlin, museum. etruscan, bronze, bibliothèque national, paris. antique, bronze, found in chiusi, (ménard et sauvageot). antique, bronze, found in herculaneum. antique, bronze, to hold a candle or torch, (ménard et sauvageot). antique, (candelabrum humile), bronze, museum, naples. antique, bronze, adjustable to different heights, found in her- culaneum. i the candelabrum was revived at the time of the renascence along with the tradition of antique art. it accepted the form; but remodelled it in its own fashion. since that time the candelabrum occurs in countless modifications, both for state and use, in religious and secular buildings. it is no more a lampstand, but bears a candle in a pricket or, more rarely, in a socket. the roman catholic ritual, in particular, the services of which require lighted candles, has given an impetus to the new forms of candelabra in metal, and carved wood set-off by painting and gilding. the finest examples of this kind are to be found in the churches and palaces of italy. plate . the renascence candelabrum. . altar candlestick, church of the benedictines, willingen, wood, gilt and silvered, late german renascence, ft. ins. high. . bronze, end of the th century, italian. . altar candlestick, certosa near pavia, th century, italian, (musterornamente). . medicean chapel, san lorenzo, florence, italian, renascence. . bronze, italian, renascence, bargello, florence. metal objects. plate . the antique candelabrum. metal objects. the renascence candelabrum. plate . the antique lamp. the antique lamp. (plate .) the antique lamp (lychnus, lucerna) is, strictly speaking, a combination of holder and pourer; and might with equal propriety have been included in the group of wases. the fundamental form, which was retained down to the latest times, is found in early egyptian household utensils; and is created by adding a handle, a funnel for filling, and a spout with an opening for the wick, to a spheroid body, figures and . in greek and roman lamps: the body becomes flattened, the funnel contracts to a simple orifice, and the round handle is either replaced by a straight one or combined with it, (figs. and ). very frequently the lamp has several wick-openings (dimyacos, tri- myacos &c.) instead of only one, (figs. , and ). clay and bronze are the materials almost exclusively employed. the clay lamps are mostly plastically decorated, more rarely painted. the decoration is most conspicuous on the handle and the spout; the upper part of the body is often treated with figures in bas-relief, (fig. ). bronze lamps are decorated with figures, with covers fastened by hinges, wick-trimmers, &c., (fig. ). and it was the bronze lamps which were especially arranged to be suspended from lampa- darii. small lampstands, in the form of low tripods, are also not scarce (figs. and ); occasionally tripod and lamp are combined, as in the example shown in fig. . by the side of examples tectoni- cally constructed, we find freer forms, imitating human figures, animal shapes, human feet, &c. in some cases these may be considered as “happy thoughts”; in others they are simply an aberration of style (figs. and ). the early days of christendom show reminiscences of the an- tique, e. g. the lamp in fig. , which also bears the monogram of christ. in later periods: the decoration degenerates, although the fun- damental form has been retained till the present time, in the east, for household lamps; the design of the modern lamp from jerusalem (fig. ) is of the simplest possible description. in the west: the old form is gradually dying-out, since the introduction of the glass cylinder, which enables the illuminating gases to be more thoroughly consumed. plate . the antique lamp. – . egyptian, clay. . antique, painted clay, (ménard et sauvageot). . antique, red clay, united collections, carlsruhe. . antique, red clay, with two spouts and vertical ring handle, united collections, carlsruhe. metal objects. plate . the antique lamp. the antique lamp. — the candlestick. . antique, with cover and ring handle, red clay, united collections, carlsruhe. . antique, bronze, with high stand, the missing cover was evidently a human mask, louvre, paris. – . antique, bronze, on small tripods (candelabrum humile). . antique, bronze, with three spouts, the figure serves as a handle for the cover, a wick-trimmer is attached to it by a chain, found in herculaneum. . antique, bronze, with two spouts, found in herculaneum, museum, naples, 'ls of original size. . antique, bronze, for suspension, (formenschatz). . early christian, bronze, with the monogram of christ, for suspension, from the catacombs, rome. . modern, oriental, clay, from jerusalem, united collections, carlsruhe. the candlestick. (plates – .) the candlestick is the candle-bearer of the middle ages, the renascence, and modern times. it is distinguished from the cande- labrum, if a distinction can be made at all where the forms thus blend with each other, by its smaller dimensions and simpler forms; and it is chiefly used for secular purposes. the principal materials beside brass, iron, copper, tin, &c., are clay, porcelain, and glass. in the middle ages; it was usual to stick the candle on a conical pricket; our modern times prefer the cylindrical socket. the design includes base (often tripartite), shaft, and socket, as in the case of the candelabrum. the upper end is furnished with a saucer or bowl, to catch the droppings. the saucer is sometimes loose, so that it may easely be taken-off and cleansed, in which case it is termed a “save-all". often the upper part is furnished with a number of arms to receive several candles. as regards decorations: the principles laid down for the candelabrum, in the chapter on supports, hold good. the seven-branched-candlestick, of the temple at jerusalem, is histo- rically celebrated; fig. of plate reproduces this from the repre- sentation of it on the triumphal arch of titus. the fundamental form of it has been retained, to this day, in jewish ritual. high candlesticks, of simple form, made of wrought-iron, are not rare in the middle ages (plate . ). richly-finished examples, in wrought-iron and bronze, were created in the renascence, (plate . , and . ). the japanese and chinese bronze candlesticks the candlestick. — the hand-candlestick. have a certain similarity to the romanesque ecclesiastical candlesticks of the same material, (plate . – ). modern productions in clay, glass and porcelain have scarcely any artistic importance; all the more must we praise modern art for recurring to the old models in metal work; and thus producing very gratifying results, (plate . , , , and plate . and ). plate . the candlestick. . romanesque, bronze, th century, dugué collection, (viollet-le- duc). romanesque, bronze, cathedral, hildesheim. romanesque, bronze. ancient chinese, bronze. brass, th century. modern, bronze, (gewerbehalle). modern, bronze, gewerbehalle, carlsruhe. modern, bronze, by prof. schick, carlsruhe, (gewerbehalle). i plate . the candlestick. . the seven-branched-candlestick of the temple at jerusalem, arch of titus, rome. . wrought-iron, s. peter's, tarrosa, spain, th century, (l'art. pour tous). - wrought-iron, for candles, th century. wrought-iron, modern. wrought-iron, with several arms, by c. zaar, (gewerbehalle). : the hand-candlestick. (plate .) the term hand-candlestick includes any kind of portable can- dlestick; and it assumes the existence of some kind of handle to hold and carry it. the hand-candlestick is always of modest dimensions; and it is generally low in height, as in our flat candlesticks. it may be constructed on an immense variety of plans, so that a number of different forms occur. candlesticks frequently recur of the form shown in fig. , in which a screw thread enables the height of the socket to be adjusted. the middle ages and the renascence exhibited great ingenuity in the invention of such arrangements (fig. ). as the hand-candlestick is liable to gutter: the “save-all” has here undergone a special developement, so that in a certain class of metal objects. plate . the candlestick. metal objects. plate . the candlestick. meyer, handbook of ornament. the hand-candlestick. — the candle-bracket. candlestick it consists of a broad dish out of which rises a shaft with a socket-bowl at the end (figs. . , , ). often an extinguisher is combinet with the candlestick, especially when the latter is of wrought-iron; as shown by the original example, fig. ; of late years match-holders have also been included. the material is the same as for other candlesticks. there is nothing special to say as regards the decoration. pate . the hand-candlestick. — . wrought-iron, th century. – . modern, wrought iron. . modern, by p. fauré of paris, (gewerbehalle). . modern, brass. . modern, brass. the candle-bracket. (plate .) candle-brackets are fixed or movable bearers attached to vertical surfaces, e. g. columns, pilasters, &c. in the middle ages and the renascence they were chiefly used for torches and candles; at the present time they are employed for candles and gas. their form naturally differs from that of the upright candlestick. curved scroll-work and consoles of metal (for this material is the one almost exclusively used) bear on their free end the prickets, or the sockets, or the burners and globes, which last are employed to diffuse the glaring light and soften the sharp shadows. a primitive method of connecting the bracket with the wall is by hook and eye (fig. ); in articles of better finish this is done by means of rosettes or wall-plates and car- touches (figs. , , , ). the bracket may be used for one or more lights. in the latter case: several prickets or sockets are placed on-a common disc (fig. ); or, which is artistically better, the main branch divides into a number of subsidiary arms (fig. ). the bracket on a large scale, is used for street-lighting, for churches, theatres, halls, mansions, palaces, restaurants, &c.; and on a smaller scale, for pianofortes, &c. in designing brackets for gas: care must be taken to provide for the gas-pipe. the modern adjustible brackets, being mostly without decoration, need not be considered. plate . the candle-bracket. – . german, renascence, wrought-iron, national museum, munich. . rococo, for candles, bronze gilt, milan museum, (raguenet). – . modern, by m. weinholdt, munich, (gewerbehalle). – . wall-plates, to , and . metal objects. the hand-candlestick. plate . * metal objects. plate . the candle-bracket. the candle-bracket. — the pendant-lamp. — the chandelier. . modern, (gewerbehalle). . modern, wrought-iron. the pendant-lamp. (plate ) both aesthetic reasons, and the danger of being knocked-over to which upright candlesticks are subject, led in early times to the con- struction of pendant-lamps. in addition to the small bronze lamps, which could be used both standing or hanging, the antique offers us lamps which could be used only for suspension. the latter form is still com- mon in the east (compare plate . ), and in the west in christian and jewish ritual. the introduction, of paraffin, gas, and the electric light, has afforded plentiful opportunities of giving an artistic form to hanging-lamps. the spherical globes of ground glass lend them- selves especially to such treatment, (figs. , , ). box-shaped hold- ers, either open or closed by panes of glass, are termed lanterns. . modern lanterns, for illumination in the open air, are generally devoid of any really artistic decoration; but the middle ages and the re- nascence created many objects of perfect form in this branch. the most suitable material for lanterns is wrought-iron (figs. and ). it is self-evident that lanterns must be so arranged that they can be opened for cleaning, &c. plate . the pendant-lamp. . old moorish, iron, united collections, carlsruhe. . mediaeval, wrought-iron, for several candles, german, (formen- schatz). . french, hôtel vogué, dijon, th century, (l'art pour tous). . modern, for electric glow-light, by peter, of esslingen, (ge- werbehalle). – . modern, (gewerbehalle). the chandelier. (plate ) the arrangement, of a considerable number of lights in circular form on a framework intended for suspension, led to the construction of the chandelier. in the middle ages: the lights were all placed in the same plane so that they formed a ring (fig. ); the re- nascence secured greater richness and variety of design by a number of rings, an arrangement which has usually been retained in our modern chandeliers (fig. and ). further variety is attained by the alternation of the lights in the different rings. wrought-iron metal objects. plate . the pendant-lamp. the chandelier. — the modern lamp. and bronze, along with glass (venetian chandeliers), and of late years cheap cast-iron, and zinc, are the chief materials. original and uni- que in design is the mermaid chandelier consisting of female half- figures terminating in fish-tails, and furnished with antlers to carry the candles (fig. ). the slender chains by which these mer- maids, and other lamps and lanterns, were suspended, are replaced in modern chandeliers by a tube which also serves as a gas-pipe. in the former case the chain was carried over pulleys so that the light could be shifted higher or lower; in modern chandeliers the adjust- ment is effected by means of a stuffing-box with balance weights (fig. ). very frequently the lower end of the chandelier terminates in a ring, to facilitate the change in height. in addition to the globes round the flames, guards are often placed over them, to protect the ceiling from heat and soot. each burner must be connected with the main gas-pipe by means of a separate pipe. where the chandelier is intended for electric lights; the latter may be bent downwards instead of upwards, so that the frames for the globes will cast no shadow. the plate gives a number of ancient and modern chande- liers, partly in half profile, the foreshortened arms, which interfere with the drawing, having been omitted. a regular arrangement, of , or arms, is the rule: more or fewer arms occur more rarely. in the case of chandeliers with a great number of lights: each arm is arranged after the fashion of a bracket with several candles. plate . the chandelier. . modern, style of the german renascence. . german, renascence, hemispherical, for candles. – . modern, bronze and wrought-iron. . modern, french, by the sculptor villeminot, (l'art pour tous). the modern lamp. (plate .) the principal value, of the modern lamp, lies in the technical completeness, and adaptation to its purpose. there is, it is true, no such wealth of artistic fancy as is shown by antique lamps; but still some good examples may be found among the two or three fundamental forms of the paraffin-lamp, with which we have mostly to do. metal, glass, porcelain, and majolica, again appear as materials. as a general rule we have a profiled foot, on which the oil-receiver rests, from which latter the burner, chimney, and globe rise, (figs. and ). more richly finished examples have a masked receiver, the latter being enclosed by a vase (figs. , and ). attempts have lately been metal objects. plate . the chandelier. metal objects. the modern lamp. plate . the altar. — the tripod. common with those of the antique; and they do not fall within the scope of our work. plate . the altar. assyrian, triangular sacrificial stone. assyrian, round sacrificial stone. assyrian, sacrificial slab, from a relief in the british museum. roman, three-sided altar, like a number of examples, differing little from one-another, in the museums in london, paris, &c. . roman, three-sided altar, used as the base of a candelabrum. – . roman, various altars, fig. with the masks of deities, and the signs of the zodiac, (ménard et sauvageot). : the tripod. (plate ) the name tripod is applied to any three-legged support, what- ever the use to which it may be put. more accurately, the tripod is a construction in three parts: the top part being a bowl, dish, or slab. the antique tripod played an important part both in religious rites and in daily life. originally an article of practical use, for cooking, &c., its form is simple; when it was elevated to an utensil of religion, to bear the sacrificial pans and the consecrated offerings for the deities, or to be the prize of victory in the games: it assu- med conventional forms, and received an artistic finish. the material was generally bronze, except for the great, monumental state-tripods, which were of marble. the greek, roman, and etruscan tripods differ characteristically from each-other, in their detail; but have this in com- mon, that they are supported by three smooth, rod-like legs, which are terminated at their lower end in animals' claws; and are connected together by rings (fig. ), or struts (figs. and ); and at the top are either connected directly with the dish (figs. and ), or with a ring intended for the reception of a loose dish (fig. ). for the sake of greater convenience, handles are sometimes attached to the dish (fig. ); the legs may be adjusted to different heights (figs. and ); or the tripod may be so arranged that it can be taken to pieces. these antique tripods, of which some of the simpler examples are given on the plate, afford us, better than anything else, an insight into the antique art of bronze-working. the middle ages and the renascence have also transmitted to us numerous tripods. their principal, use is in households as stands for washing-basins, &c.; and they are generally of wrought-iron (figs. , , ). after the art of working in wrought-iron had been revived in modern times, we find them as stands for washing-apparatus, trays for visiting-cards, stands for wine-coolers, (fig. ), &c. metal objects. º =- *~~~~ plate . the altar. metal objects. the tripod. plate . the tripod. — the censer. plate . the tripod. . antique, bronze, found in pompeii, about museum, naples. ins. high. . romanesque, bronze, (ménard et sauvageot). . etruscan, bronze, berlin museum. . mediaeval, bronze, pierrefonds castle, (viollet-le-duc.). – . italian, th century, wrought-iron, about ft. high, (l'art pour tous). . modern, wrought-iron, for wine-cooler, by the architect zaar, (gewerbehalle). the censer. (plate .) one of the oldest ecclesiastical utensils is the censer or thu- rible, in the use of which the rising clouds of incense are a sym- bolical representation of prayer ascending to heaven. the material is silver, bronze, iron, copper, or brass. the lower part consists of a dish with foot, containing the fire-pan. the pierced cover is kept in its place by means of the three chains which pass through the three holes made for the purpose. these three chains hang from a small plate with a ring. the cover is fastened to a fourth chain, which also terminates in a chain and may be drawn up through a hole in the plate (fig. ). the decoration is frequently symbolic, and in- scriptions are also used. the romanesque and gothic censers often exhibit an architectonic design of domes and towers (figs. , , ). the renascence prefers the strict form of a vessel (figs. , and ). modern art avails itself of ancient models, without having anything independent to show. an appendage of the censer, in a certain sense, is the censer-boat, or incense-holder, usually an elliptical dish with a partition and two hinged covers. the incense is conveyed from the incense-boat to the censer by means of a spoon. plate . the censer. — . romanesque, bronze, th and th centuries, each 'ſ, ins. high, collection of antiquities, grand-ducal court, mannheim. . romanesque, bronze, french, beginning of the th century, °), ins. high, (viollet-le-duc.). – . gothic, from stone statues, cathedral, chartres, th century, (l'art pour tous). . gothic, with tower shaped cover. – . renascence. renascence, south kensington museum, london. metal objects. the censer. plate . metal objects. meyer, handbook of ornament. the crucifix. plate . the crozier, and the monstrance. bolically represented by the fight with the dragon (fig. ). in the gothic period the knob below the curve is developed into an archi- tectonic lantern. the length of the crozier is to ft. the material is wood, ivory, and metal, usually contrasting in the different parts. the plate only reproduces the upper ends; as these alone are of importance by their decoration. the monstrance is a utensil allied to the ciborium and reli- quary. it is an expository vessel in which, since the institution of the feast of corpus christi by urban iv in , the consecrated wafer is shown and carried in processions in roman catholic churches. it possesses great varieties both of style and size, the height varying from ft. to ft. it usually has a slender hexagonal or octagonal foot, and a knob. from the foot rises a tower-like receptacle (turri- cula), or a “glory” with a disc-shaped glass box in which the wafer rests on the so-called eye. the material is gold, silver, or brass. the plate gives one of the numerous examples which have been preserved. plate . the crozier, and the monstrance. . romanesque, bishop gerard of limoges, t . – . romanesque. . transition period from romanesque to gothic, french, (l'art pour tous). . gothic, martin schongauer, end of th century, (wessely). . rococo, ivory. . monstrance, gilt brass, ins. high, hotzendorf. c. utensils of war and hunting; weapons. utensils of war and hunting, in their most primitive forms at least, are as old as mankind itself. savages of the earliest as well as of modern times, show great skill, and a certain originality in the decoration of these utensils, as we may see in our ethnological collections. so long as these utensils continued to be made of horn, bone, and such materials: and also so long as they belong to the so- called “stone age", they are comparatively simple. they do not assume a richer form and finish till the introduction of bronze and iron. the great revolution which ensued on the transition from the “stone” to the “bronze age" finds a not less imposing parallel in the revolution wrought by the invention of gunpowder. utensils of war and hunting may be divided into two great sections: weapons of defense and weapons of offense. to the former belong shields, helmets and armour. the kinds and number of metal objects. plate . the crozier, and the monstrance. % the shield. weapons of offense are far more manifold. swords, daggers, spears, pikes, lances, axes, maces, arrows, rifles, and pistols, are the principal. it is unfortunately impossible, in this work, to give due consideration to every single form; still the chief representatives have been included, with the exception of firearms and armour, in which only the engraved or chased details are of decorative importance. the most striking examples, in our armouries and museums, have lately been published, in numerous works; so that it is not difficult to obtain a general view of this section; monographs on wea- pons have also been published, among which we may specially men- tion boeheim's waffenkunde (e. a. seemann, leipzig). the shield. (plate .) the shield, which from the earliest times has been the usual weapon of defense against blows and thrusts, is generally a domed disc, the form of which has varied considerably. circular, elliptical, semi-circular, and kite-shapes, are found alongside others of richer out- line. the materials are wood, plaited osiers, leather, metal, and combinations of these. the shield is held in the left hand by a handle, or slung on the arm by a strap. the size varies from ins. to ft. the antique shield was circular; and frequently ornamented with a boss in the centre. among the ancient teutons, the form was large and square; in the middle ages, it was triangular. the standing-shields or pavises, of the th and th centuries, were very large, and provided with feet, so that they would stand upon the ground, without being held. the tilting-shield had a hole cut- away in which the lance was laid. with the introductions of fire-arms the shield became worthless, and disappears as an article of practical use; but it has continued to be employed for state-purposes down to the present time; and, from a decorative standpoint, these state- shields are of high interest. they offer to metal-workers an except- ionally favourable field for the display of their art. the simple zonal divisions of the antique shield have given place to freer divisions and a richer decoration with figures and ornaments. plate . the shield. . roman, with boss, bronze partly-silvered, found near mainz, wics- baden, museum. . etruscan, bronze, campana collection, (l'art pour tous). . mediaeval, time of the crusades, (viollet-le-duc.). . renascence, time of henry ii of france, hammered metal. metal objects. plate- . the shield. the shield. — the helmet. . renascence, decorated in the centre with a rosette and pointed knob, turin. . renascence, with rich decoration of figures, in hammered metal. . renascence, hammered silver, by p. van vianen. the helmet. (plate .) the armour for the defense of the head is the helmet. it was probably originally made of leather; at a later date it was of metal; and in modern times it again consists of leather with metal accessories. its form has suffered many transformations in the course of the cent- uries, arising sometimes from practical, sometimes from aesthetic reasons. the greatest perfection of form is found in the greek helmet, which, like antique armour in general, fits very closely to the human body. we need only remind the reader of the plain but beautiful helmets in which pallas athene is shown on antique gems. the medusa head and sphinxes are popular motives of decoration. the decoration is most prominent on the front, and on the moveable cheek-pieces. fig. shows a greek helmet with a crest which is similar to the form of the phrygian cap. the etruscan helmet (fig. ) is similar to the greek. the roman helmet is simpler. helmets were often decorated with plumes of feathers or horse-hair; and were provided with sockets for fixing these accessories. the roman gladiators' helmets, with their rich, florid, often overdone de- coration, and their large face-guard and heavy crest, have something awkward, without becoming ugly. very manifold, although of no great importance decoratively, are the helmets of the middle ages. leaving out of account the less important transitional forms, we will here give the names of the principal classes in order of historical succession. they are the heaume (fig. ), the salade or sallet (fig. ), the tilting-helmet (fig. ), the armet (fig. ), and the helmet with barred vizor (fig. ). the section on heraldry may also be consulted. the helmets of the renascence, especially the state-helmets, are richly, sometimes too richly, decorated. to the forms received, from the middle ages, were added the burganet (fig. ), and the morion (fig. ). some of these state-helmets are also copied from the antique, as may be seen in fig. . the modern creations in this section are of no artistic importance. plate . the helmet. . greek, bronze, campana collection, (l'art pour tous). . etruscan, bronze, campana collection, (l'art pour tous). metal objects. the helmet. plate . the helmet. — the sword. — the dagger. . roman, bronze, louvre, paris, (ménard et sauvageot). – . roman, bronze, for gladiators, different views, (ménard et sauvageot). . mediaeval salade, iron. . mediaeval heaume, iron, the chain was hooked into the cross- shaped slit. . mediaeval tilting-helmet, iron. - . mediaeval armet, iron. . mediaeval, iron, with barred vizor. . renascence, morion, etched iron. . renascence burganet, german. . state-helmet, th century, (l'art pour tous). the sword. (plate .) the sword is the most universally used of the offensive weapons. much as these weapons for cutting and thrusting differ from each other in size and finish; they generally consist of three principal parts: the blade, single or double-edged, tapering more or less towards the point, generally straight, but sometimes curved or waved, also sometimes fluted to save weight, only decorated by means of engraving, etching, damaskeening, &c.; the handle, with or without pommel, cup, or basket; and the scabbard or sheath, with or without a hanger. the two latter, the handle and scabbard, offer the most scope for decoration. the material of these is, in addition to iron, the other metals and alloys, wood, bone, leather, coloured stones, &c. here, also, from an artistic point of view, we have to consider less the practical than the state-swords, on which the renascence, the following styles, and modern art, have found ample opportunity to exercise their artistic skill. plate offers a small selection from the copious material in our armouries and collections of weapons. plate . the sword, and its scabbard. — . assyrian, from reliefs. and . egyptian. . prehistoric, bronze, found in switzerland. – . mediaeval, and renascence. – . renascence. – . renascence, pommel, guard, and chape, by hans holbein the younger, (formenschatz). the sword, and its scabbard. plate . metal objects. the dagger, and its scabbard. plate . the halberd. — the spoon. with one side terminating in an axe or a hammer, and the other in a point (fig. ). the halberd is a combination of the pike or partizan with the battle-axe (figs. and ). the mace is a handle with a knob of various forms; when it is set with spikes, it is called a “morning-star", and when set with radiating blades, it is termed a quadrelle (fig. ). the war-flail is distinguished from the mace by the knob being fastened to the handle by a chain. and so on, in endless variety. so far as decoration is concerned: the first place is due to halberds and partizans; not only because the shape of the blade is frequently very varied and handsome, but also because the union with the shaft, by means of bands, nails, tassels, &c., gives an oppor- tunity for rich colour. the blades, also, are often decorated by damaskeening, engraving, gilding, etc. plate . the halberd, &c. . partizan, richly-etched, german, th century, historical museum, dresden, (kunsthandwerk). . halberd, richly-etched, german, , artillery museum, paris, (l'art pour tous). . fauchard, richly-etched, german, , artillery museum, paris, (l'art pour tous). . partizan, richly-etched, german, th century, artillery museum, paris, (l'art pour tous). . partizan, richly-etched, german, , royal armoury, berlin, (kunsthandwerk). and . halberds. . combination of war-scythe and war-fork. . battle-axe, hindu, united collections, carlsruhe. . mace, so-called quadrelle, (viollet-le-duc.). . pike. (the shafts have been omitted, or only partially indicated). c. table utensils. the spoon. (plate .) the spoon is, strictly speaking, a dipper; and has already been alluded-to in the discussion of the group of wessels (comp. plate ). it is here treated in the group of utensils. as a table utensil the metal objects. plate . the spoon. the spoon. — the knife, and the fork. . persian, from an inkstand, th century, °l, ins. long, duhousset collection, (l'art pour tous). . persian, th century, ', ins. long, duhousset collection, (l'art pour tous). german, tin, inscription: “trink und is, gott nit vergis", united collections, carlsruhe. . modern, french, (gewerbehalle). . modern, silver gilt and enamelled, by the architect f. o. schulze, (gewerbehalle). . modern, silver, by f. seitz. the knife and the fork. (plate .) knives and forks, unlike spoons, are of comparatively late introduction as table utensils. although it is probable that they were in use at a very early period as kitchen utensils for carving food, still they did not attain the rank of a recognised dinner set until the art of eating had reached a certain refinement. it has been maintained that knives and forks appeared on dinner tables towards the close of the roman empire. in our own country it can be proved that they did not come into general use until the th or th century. this may be explained by the circumstance that in the earlier period of the middle ages, as at the present time in the east, food was carried to the mouth with the fingers or with a spoon, after having undergone the necessary division into small portions in the kitchen. cleanliness was ensured by frequently washing the hands during dinner. as regards form and material: what has been said of spoons, is also true for knives and forks. the handles are similarly shaped, to secure uniformity in the whole set; the bowl of the spoon is replaced by the two, or more prongs of the fork, or by the blade of the knife. the handle is made of wood, ivory, &c., and it is comparatively stronger as it must possess a greater power of re- sistance because the tang or prolongation of the blade, which is always made of steel, must be let-into it. as the plate shows, the shape of the blade has passed through many changes in the course of time. to cut the “consecrated bread” the middle ages employed peculiar knives, the blades of which were engraved with mottoes and musical scales. plate . the knife, and the fork. – . mediaeval, ( th– th century), wooden handle inlaid with silver. metal objects. the knife, and the fork. plate . meyer, handbook of ornament. the knife, and the fork. — the paper-knife. — the scissors. – . gothic, th century, the prongs of alloy, the handle of ivory mounted with silver, 'ſ, ins. long, garneray collection. mediaeval, copper gilt, ', ins. long, garneray collection. renascence, ivory, leon bach collection, (l'art pour tous). renascence, south kensington museum, london. renascence, bach collection, (l'art pour tous). renascence, bach collection, (l'art pour tous). barocco period, south kensington museum, london. – . renascence, dresden, (musterornamente). – . ditto. - – . modern, silver gilt and enamelled, by f. o. schulze, (ge- werbehalle). . modern, silver gilt and enamelled, by f. o. schulze, (ge- werbehalle). i the paper-knife. (plate ) paper-knives are an invention of modern times. as the name implies, they are used for cutting paper, the edges of books, news- papers, and letters; and they find a place on every desk. the form is usually that of a one or two-edged knife. as the blade does not require to be very sharp, it is generally made of the same material as the handle, and in most cases of ivory, wood, or brass. the decoration is generally confined to the handle; the blade is at most decorated with flat enrichment. plate . the paper-knife. . modern, brass. – . modern, ivory or wood, by dir. g. kachel, (gewerbehalle). – . modern, wood carving, by j. eberhardt, heilbronn. . modern, pierced metal. - the scissors. (plate .) scissors, intended primarily for use in ladies' work, and after- wards applied to a variety of other purposes, are mostly met-with in two different fundamental forms. the earlier form (french: forces), which held its ground up to the end of the middle ages, has a spring hoop which unites the two blades (fig. ). the later form (french: ciseaua), which begins to appear sporadically as early as the th century, has two separate blades moveable round a central metal objects. plate . the paper-knife. * the scissors. — the hand-bell. pivot, and terminating at one end in the blades and at the other in handles with ring-shaped eyelets to receive the fingers (figs. , , , ). the shape is usually symmetrical. variations, like fig. , are rare. not infrequently, the scissors are provided with a chain by means of which they may be suspended, either alone or with other articles, from a chatelaine. the points are sometimes protected by a guard (fig. ). the decoration is generally confined to the handles, and frequently consists of pierced work; the blades are plain, or decorated by inlaying, &c. where handle and blades are not of the same metal, which in this case can only be steel, the handles are often of brass or silver. between these two extremes are gilt, silvered, and nickelled handles. the renascence gratified its luxurious taste to the full, in the matter of scissors; in modern times, the plainer and simpler forms are preferred. the length of the blades varies, according to the purpose; but the size of the handles remains the same, being governed by that of the human hand; hence the pro- portions between the two are very various. among scissors which are intended for special purposes, and depart from the usual form: may be mentioned snuffers, and “lazy-tongs” (fig. ). plate . the scissors. . renascence, sonth kensington museum, london. . renascence, blades etched, handles gilt, august i of saxony, royal historical museum, dresden, (kunsthandwerk). – . persian, th century, 's ins. and ||, ins. long, duhousset collection, (l'art pour tous). renascence, south kensington museum, london. . renascence, german, dresden, (musterornamente). . renascence, handles silver gilt, german (kunsthandwerk). snuffers, in bird form. lazy-tongs, united collections, carlsruhe. the hand-bell. (plate ) in those utensils of which it may be said that as a rule they are artistically decorated beyond what is wanted for practical purposes, we may reckon the hand-bell. during the middle ages and the renascence: the hand-bell seems to have been chiefly used in an official capacity in council-chambers and for ecclesiastical purposes; and its introduction into ordinary households, to summon the atten- dants did not take place till later. in our own times, so prolific of parliamentary and other meetings: the hand-bell is indispensable. the necessary parts are: the resonant cup, the clapper suspended in the metal objects. plate . the scissors. metal orjects. ſºsº. &@nº. º —º ºrivº º: \ º- *- - - º - º —t the hand-bell. plate . the door-knocker. these latter objects in particular, a much more extensive collection might have been made if the allotted space had permitted. there is scarcely a tool or instrument which did not occasionally receive an artistic finish during the renascence. the introduction of the so- called “master-pieces" into the guilds, naturally led to the result that unnecessary labour was sometimes expended on the most ordinary things. but still we shall offer sufficient to give the reader the necessary view of the entire section. the door-knocker. (plate .) although the door-knocker was in use in antiquity, as proved by an example (the head of medusa with ring) found in capua: still the strict period of the door-knocker is in the romanesque, gothic, and renascence epochs. in modern times: it has already become a historical object, having been ousted by bellpulls, &c. it is made almost exclusively of bronze, and cast or wrought iron. its dimensions are variable, like those of the doors and gates them- selves, to which it must bear some proportion. we may distinguish three principal classes. the first has the form of a ring, usually suspended from a lion's jaws; in which case it is at the same time a door-handle (figs. – ). the second has the form of a hammer moveable on a primitive hinge. the third class, which arose in italy in the best days of the renascence, shows figures, animals, &c. (figs. and ). in all three classes the requisite noise is produced by the moveable part falling on a metal stud. in the third class the plate by which the knocker is affixed to the door is of subsidiary importance, while in the two former classes it is often the principal feature of the design. the gothic period devised richly-decorated plates of pierced - work. this motive was often retained by the re- nascence (fig. ), or replaced by double-headed eagles and the like (fig. ). the plate gives different examples, selected from the copious material. plate . the door-knocker. romanesque, bronze, north portal of the cathedral of puy-en-velay, th century. mediaeval, 's ins, square, soyter collection, augsburg. . renascence, ", ins. square, museum, berlin. . transition from gothic to renascence, ||, ins. square, s. peter's, strassburg. . renascence, wrought-iron, german, national museum, munich. . renascence, (guichard). ; metal objects. plate . the door-knocker. metal objects. the key. plate . the hand-mirror. — the fan. . renascence, (guichard). . renascence, south kensington museum, london. – . renascence, german. – . bows, th century, (wessely). – . modern, by the architect otto girard, berlin, (gewerbehalle). the hand-mirror. (plate .) the first place in the series of ladies' toilet requisites belongs to the hand-mirror. its history falls into two periods. in antiquity and in the earlier years of the middle ages: mirrors were made of polished metal, either bronze or silver. about the th century, glass begins to be used, the reflecting surface being backed with metal foil. the antique, and particulary the etruscan mirrors, of which a large number have been preserved to us, show engraved ornaments and figures from mythology and daily life, mostly of primitive, but sometimes of excellent, workmanship. glass mirrors are, generally, flat. the fundamental shape of the antique mirror is circular or spatulate (figs. – ); and that of the glass mirror is circular or elliptical (figs. and ). the plastic decoration of antique mirrors is confined to the handle, and the frame. the handle and frame may be of a great variety of materials, wood, ivory, or metal. here, too, it is the renascence which shows the richest decoration. where the decoration consists of figures, these are in keeping with the object; and show amorini and aphroditic personages. with the increasing use of wall or plate-glass mirrors, the hand-mirror has lost much of its former importance; so that modern art no longer devotes much atten- tion to it. plate . the hand-mirror. . egyptian, bronze, united collections, carlsruhe. . egyptian, bronze, handle of carved wood, british museum, london. – . greek, bronze. . pompeian. – . etruscan, engraved figures, handles lost. renascence, (kunst und gewerbe). renascence, by etienne de laulne ( to ), (wessely). the fan. (plate .) the fan is undoubtedly the most interesting of all toilet requisites. its history can be traced back uninterruptedly for years, although metal objects. * - - the hand-mirror. plate . the fan. it did not enjoy the same measure of popularity in every period. it alone would almost suffice to furnish a historical picture of the artistic and technical developement of industrial art through all periods. the object of the fan is twofold. firstly, it is used to direct a current of cool air to the face; and secondly, to keep off flies and other insects. from its first use it derives its latin name of “flabellum” (from flare = to blow, french “éventail”); from its second use its latin name “muscarium” (from musca = a fly, french “esmouchoir”). fans of this latter class are usually called “fly-flappers". occasion- ally, the fan is used to blow the fire (as in ancient persia, where the blowing of the fire with the lips was forbidden for religious reasons); and as a symbol of dignity in ecclesiastical and court cere- monies. a consideration of its purpose renders it obvious that it is chiefly employed in the hotter countries of the globe. the manifold forms of the fan may be reduced to different principal types: . the fixed fan: a leaf immovably attached to a handle (figs. – ). . the pennon fan: attached to the side of the handle, and movable round it in a horizontal direction (figs. and ). the forms and materials of the fixed and the pennon fan are of the utmost variety. . the radial fan: a rectangle of paper, silk or some other material, fastened to a handle in such a manner that it may be folded together and spread out in the form of a circle (fig. ). . the lamellar fan: pieces of stiff material e. g. slips of ivory, are connected together at one end by a pin, which serves as the axis. they are collapsible into a narrow shape, and may be opened-out to a semi-circle. they are held-together by a ribbon drawn through them (fig. ). . the folding fan: distinguished from the preceding by the lamellae being covered by a sheet of paper, silk, &c., which is folded-together or spread-out by the opening of the sticks which compose the frame (fig. ). it appears from this that the fixed, the pennon, and the radial fans have handles, while the lamellar and the folding fans have not. the radial fan, being a folding fan with a handle, is a kind of inter- mediate form. the size of the fan varies according to fashion and the purpose for which it is intended, regard being usually paid to convenience of handling; as a general rule, it may be said that the firmer, stiffer and more impervious to air the fan is: the smaller it may be. fans for cooling should have a short, broad form, fly- flappers require a longer, narrower shape. metal objects. the fan. plate . the fan. on the subject of history and style, the following may be said: the fixed fan is the oldest and most primitive. its natural model is a leaf on a stalk, just as savages at the present time make their fans of dried palm-leaves or of plaited work in the form of leaves (fig. ). the feather may also be regarded as a natural model, and hence its frequent application to fans of every kind. the pennon fan is the least practical, its domain is the middle ages and the early renascence, together with certain parts of the east (india, turkey, morocco, tunis, &c.). the radial fan was also in use in the middle ages (with a long handle), and down to the present time in certain parts of italy, persia, china, and japan. the lamellar and the folding fan are of later date. their introduction is contemporaneous with the general use of the fan in europe ( th century). after the period of the lamellar fan in the th century, follows the golden age of the folding fan in the rococo period. the folding fan is also the predominant form in modern times. egyptian mural paintings and assyrian reliefs frequently show fan - bearers, with larger or smaller fly - flappers, in the retinue of the kings. the most common egyptian forms are given in figs, and , the assyrian in fig. . scarcely any vestige has been pre- served of antique fans. judging by the pictures on vases, &c., the greek fan consisted of a leaf, cut to a palmette - shape, on a long handle. the roman ladies were somewhat luxurious in the matter of fans, which they either managed themselves or had carried by slaves; and under the emperors the men were also. in the middle ages, the fan entered into the service of the church; deacons and ministrans kept-off flies from the consecrated host by means of the flabella, which often took the form of six-winged seraphs. when the fan became popular for secular purposes, its use was given up in churches. as already observed, the renascence passed from the fixed, to the lamellar and folding fan. the lamellar fan offered numerous opportunities for carved and pierced work in ivory, horn, tortoiseshell, filigree, and enamel work. the folding fan offered an unlimited field for decoration by painting; and painters, like boucher, watteau, and others, devoted themselves to fan-painting (pastoral scenes &c.). during this period the “puzzle-fan" was invented, which shows differ. ent pictures according to the way it is folded. lace fans, fans with mirrors, monograms, and autographs, and the bespangled empire-fans, complete the category. the modern ball-room fan is a large folding fan generally decorated with naturalistic paintings of flowers. but all possible forms ara occasionally used. france, china, and japan supply the fan market. heinrich frauberger, who has written a most valuable monograph on the fan”, maintains that the latter countries * h. frauberger: “die geschichte des fächers." leipzig; k. scholtze. the fan. — warious tools. alone manufacture between them about ºl, of the million fans which are annually made on the globe. finally we may briefly enumerate the materials which are prin- cipally used in the manufacture of fans. they are: bamboo, palm- leaves, wood, bone, horn, ivory, tortoise-shell, mother-of-pearl, metal, paper, straw and other plaited material, silk, lace, gelatine, mica, leather, feathers, &c. plate . the fan. egyptian, fly-flapper, feathers, handle omitted. . egyptian, feather-fan. . assyrian, fly-flapper, from a relief, british museum. modern, fly-flapper, plaited palm-leaves, south caroline is- lands, (frauberger). modern, fly-flapper, plaited palm-leaves, united collections, carlsruhe. . modern, palm-leaf, cut and bound at the edge. – . modern, japanese, bamboo and paper. . modern, printed paper with silk fringe and gilt wooden handle. . modern, siamese, handle of whipped wood, centre of paste- board, decorated with rosettes and bordered with peacock feathers, united collections, carlsruhe. . modern, hindu, handle of wood, centre of pasteboard covered with silk, braid, and butterfly wings, bordered with peacock feathers, (frauberger). . mediaeval, radial-fan, french, (viollet-le-duc.). . modern, folding-fan, wood and grouse feathers. . modern, folding-fan, wood, painted silk, and gold. . warious tools. (plate .) among the tools and instruments which only occasionally or accidentally receive an artistic finish we may mention: hammers, tongs, compasses, cocks, pestles, hour-glasses, and clocks, along with many other things. no attempt can be made here to treat these articles in detail. but it may be said that, in general, the bighly-decorated examples have been specially made for state-occasions, e.g. the hammer (fig. ), with which pope julius iii inaugurated the jubilee year ( ) by knocking three times on the walled-up main- portal of s. peter's, as a sign that it should be opened. plate exhibits a number of such objects. meyer, handbook of ornament. metal objects. gae- various tools. plate . warious tools. plate . various tools. . ceremonial-hammer, silver gilt, italian, th century, pre- sented by gregory xiii to duke ernest of bavaria, beneath the enamelled armorial bearings is the inscription: “julius iii pont. max. jubilaeum viii condidit feliciter mcccccl.; the relief on the reverse shows moses striking water from the rock, with the words: percussit petram et fluxerunt aquae", national museum, munich; (kunsthandwerk). tongs, iron, german, germanisches museum, nuremberg. snuffers, brass, german, renascence, germanisches museum, nuremberg. . compasses, bronze, chased, engraved, and gilt, german, th century, half the size of the original. cock, brass, cast and chased, german, th century, ", ins. long, (vorbilder für die kleinkunst in bronze). match-holder, bronze, modern. * furniture. furniture, in its broader sense, is a collective name for all kinds of household goods and chattels. it is more strictly confined to such objects as chairs, tables, wardrobes, &c. but even in this narrower sense the examples of furniture are so numerous that it is not possible to give a detailed description and discussion of each indivi- dual article on the plates which are devoted to this group. and it is the less necessary to do this as our object is only to give a view of the application of decoration to furniture in general. we show a series of the more important articles, while others, such as pianos, and wardrobes, have been omitted. they have been so grouped that plates to contain the different varieties of chairs, while the following plates are devoted to tables, cabinets, bed- steads, cradles, &c. the examples have been chiefly taken from the antique, the renascence, and modern times; while the middle ages, the barocco and rococo periods have only occasionally been taken into account. that particular attention has been paid to the german renascence, is based on the fact, that this period is specially distinguished for its achievements in the field of richly-decorated furniture. this chapter might seem to offer an inducement to give a historical account of the development of tectonic form in the different periods of art. but to do this, with any thoroughness, would also require us to abandon the condiseness we have hitherto maintained; and furniture. we will therefore only refer the reader to the details in semper: “der stil”, and to the highly-interesting work by georg hirth: “das deutsche zimmer der gothik und renaissance, des barock-, rokoko-, und zopfstils" (g. hirth, munich and leipzig). the necessary in- formation about the furniture of the egyptians, assyrians, greeks, and romans will be found in ménard et sauvageot: “la vie privée des anciens"; and about the middle ages in viollet-le-duc.: “dic. tionnaire raisonné du mobilier français"; from both of which works we have taken numerous examples for our plates. besides these, there is such a number of cyclopaedic works on this subject that it is impossible even to name them all here. a. seats. as regards seats: the fundamental form has generally been depen- dent on the special purpose, and on the ever-varying mode of life; while the details have been influenced by the artistic taste of the time, and by the material used. definite fundamental types often recur by the side of new and arbitrary special forms; and we have attempted a classification according to these fundamental forms. the simplest and most primitive form, although for many pur- poses the least comfortable, is that of the taboret or ottoman, which is without a back. the chair is more comfortable because of the addition of the back; and it becomes still more so, when arms are added. to this group belongs the throne, which in view of its pur- pose is more monumental in form, and richer in material. revolving, folding, and rocking chairs meet the demand for special purposes. the stall, and the “prie-dieu" also have peculiar accessories, due to their being used for other purposes than sitting. the bench and the couch offer a seat or repose for several persons simultaneously. in spite of the variety of forms, one feature is common to nearly all, namely, the height of the seat. in order to sit comfortably, the feet should just reach the ground, and the height of the seat is there- fore from ins. to ins. the depth of the seat shows greater va- riations, from ins. to ins. the height of the back varies from ins. and more; the fact having to be taken into consideration that the head, when it is leant back, should have a proper support. the upper surface of the arms should be about ins. above that of the seat. straight, upright backs are less comfortable than curved lines adapted to the vertebral curve. similarly: flat, horizontal seats are not so suitable as those which slope downwards towards the back. the principal materials are wood, cane, and metal; stone, terra- cotta, &c., are rarer. as it is unpleasant to rest against a hard the chair. material for any length of time, recourse is had to cane, or flexible seats, skins, cushions, and upholstering. in course of time, chairs have become more comfortable with the progress of comfort in general. it may be specially emphasized that the handsomest and most richly- decorated seats are not usually the most practical; further remarks are reserved for the discussion of the different forms. the chair (plates – ) the chair is a stool with a back to it. the most usual form has four legs. sometimes the legs are connected-together by braces or ties, which are called foot-rails. the seat generally has the shape of an oblong, a square, or a trapezium. circular and polygonal seats are less common. hexagonal and octagonal seats, with a corresponding number of legs, begin to appear in the th century; and certain wooden chairs of the renascence have seats in the form of regular or semi-regular polygons (plate . , , ). the legs are prismatic or turned, frequently with claw feet, while the top of the back terminates in knobs, animal-heads, or masks (plates . ; . ; . , , ). instead of legs, the seats of the wooden chairs of the renascence are sometimes supported by perforated and carved boards, either at the two sides or in front and behind (plate . , , ). where the back is carved out of a single piece, as is the case with many renascence and modern chairs, the two hinder legs have the same form and height as the front legs (plates . , ; . ). very often the back is treated as a frame (plate . , , ), or is bent into a cylindrical plan, as in the greek “klismos” (plate . , ), and its imitation, the empire chair (plate . ). openings for the hand are made in carved wooden backs for convenience in moving (plate . , , ). where the top of the back is hori- zontal, it is often crowned with a cornice or an ornament (plates . ; . ). where the seat, alone or in conjunction with the back, is of woven cane-work or padded, the chair is termed a “cane" or an “upholstered” chair. sometimes not only the padding but also the entire structure of the chair is upholstered in some material, just as, on the other hand, chairs may be made entirely of cane or rushes. the seats and backs of upholstered chairs are covered with leather, or textiles (plate . ). the overlaying of wood with metal occurs in the assyrian style, and occasionally in later periods; the state- chairs of the middle ages, especially the byzantine, are not infre- quently decorated with coloured stones; a similar treatment may be observed in the renascence example (plate figs. , and ). in addition to the decoration by carving (which will always be the chief furniture. º £ . fººt: ====r. : : --- i. - - - -- i - i - - - it ir --- - - -- tº- - º --> . plate the chair. furniture. plate . the chair. the chair. – the throne, and the arm-chair. material of common frames), we find inlays of bone, (the socalled “certosina work" of the th century), metal, &c. plate . the chair. – . egyptian, (ménard et sauvageot). . egyptian, mural painting, tomb of ramses iii, thebes, (ménard et sauvageot). egyptian, upholstered with patterned material, british museum. . egyptian, british museum. – . greek, draped with skin, “klismos" form, (ménard et sauvageot). . antique, with cushions and foot-stool, pompeian, (ménard et sauvageot). . greek, vase, painting. . antique, with statue of jupiter, (ménard et sauvageot). . french empire period, (gallien). plate . the chair. german, renascence, wood, moreau collection, (l'art pour tous). flemish, wood, th century, (l'art pour tous). italian, wood, th century, (l'art pour tous). dutch, upholstered in leather, (crispin van den passe, ). german, decorated with stones, renascence, museum, dresden. german, th century, (gewerbehalle). german, th century, germanisches museum, nuremberg. i . plate . the chair. . modern, “inn-chair", by dir. kachel, (gewerbehalle). — . modern, cane, (gewerbehalle). – . modern, (gewerbehalle). . renascence, (raguenet). . modern, (gewerbehalle). the throne, and the arm-chair. (plates — .) thrones and arm-chairs have been grouped-together, because the former almost always have the same form as the latter, and there is no essential difference since the time of the renascence. the throne being the seat-of-honour, has naturally, from the earliest periods,' received more attention and decoration. it is planned on a larger and more monumental scale than the ordinary chair. for this reason, and also because it does not require to be so often moved as common furnitur - - the chair. plate . the throne, and the arm-chair. chairs, it is often made of marble, metal, &c. very often it is raised on a dais, with steps, or a foot-stool is placed in front of it; not infrequently it is covered by a baldacchino or canopy, with hangings, or a cornice. this is especially the case with those for royal per- sonages and bishops in the middle ages. as regards the decoration: figures and symbols may be added to the other decorations of the frame. the arm-chair, in its simplest form, is distinguished from the ordinary chair by the addition of arms, which are generally supported from the fore-legs, and connected with the back, whereas in the case of the throne, when the material is stone, the arms are made in one solid piece with the whole. compared with the ordinary chair, the arm-chair is larger, and more conducive to repose. where it is in- tended to serve as the seat-of-honour for the head of the family, or a chairman, it corresponds in style to other chairs of the set, and only differs from them in its size and its richer finish. the furni- ture of our modern drawing-rooms generally consists of or chairs, with easy-chairs, &c. in addition to the egyptian and assyrian thrones, and the roman state-chair, the “sella curulis”: we may mention as belonging to this group, the norwegian stall of the th century (plate , ), and the polygonal chair enclosed by a lattice, as shown by fig. of the same plate. plate . the throne, and the arm-chair. . egyptian throne, with lotus ornament, the arms formed by the wings of the sacred hawk, (teirich). . ancient persian throne, bas-relief, persepolis, the decoration represents a king sitting on his throne borne-up by slaves, (ménard et sauvageot). . assyrian throne, relief, (ménard et sauvageot). . greek priest's-chair, marble, by the door of the temple of the- mis, athens, (raguenet). . greek judge's-chair (proëdra), marble, found on the site of the prytaneum, athens. . antique bath-chair, (sella balnearis), the openings served to admit the vapour, (ménard et sauvageot). . greek arm-chair, relief of a tomb, representing the deceased on the thronos. . greek throne, harpy monument, from xanthos in lycia, british museum. . roman arm-chair, with decoration symbolic of ceres, (ménard et sauvageot). the throne, and the arm-chair. — the stall. . roman arm-chair, found in herculaneum, museum at portici, (raguenet). . antique terracotta, representing an arm-chair in the form of the hollowed-out body of a sphinx, (l'art pour tous). . chair of s. peter, wood with ivory reliefs iilustrating the story of hercules, s. peter's at rome, (ménard et sauvageot). plate . the throne, and the arm-chair. . norwegian stall, th century, from bö, telemark. . * arm-chair, with foot-stool and draped back, (viollet- e-duc). . king david's arm-chair, th century, from relief, portal of cathedral, auxerre, (viollet-le-duc). . frame of mediaeval arm-chair, iron, the drapery omitted, (viollet. le-duc.). . mediaeval polygonal chair, painting, chapel in toulouse, (viollet- le-duc.). . mediaeval arm-chair, metal, the drapery omitted, th century, (viollet-le-duc). . mediaeval arm-chair, decorated with fringe, end of the th cen- tury, bas-relief, stalls, amiens, (viollet-le-duc.). . english arm-chair, th century, wood, upholstered. . arm-chair, louis xvi style, wood carved and gilded, (williamson). . modern arm-chair. . modern arm-chair. (raguenet). the stall. (plate .) the rows of seats along the north, west, and south sides of the choir in chapels, &c., are termed stalls. they have a peculiar con- struction corresponding to their special use. in the earliest period of the middle ages the single seats to the right and left of the bishop's chair were built into the wall of the chancel, at a later period they were replaced by moveable seats; and these again, from about the th century onwards, were replaced by stalls, strictly so-called; the seats being united in a continuous row, with an architectonic character and construction. there are generally two rows, one behind the other, and the hinder row is a little elevated. partitions divide the seats from one another; and serve as arms. between the partitions are the seats. these are either fixed or arranged to fold back. in the latter case a console-like projection is attached to the underside of the seat, to serve as a kind of rest when the seat is folded-back: thus, out of pity for the aged monks, rendering it possible to rest furniture. - º_ ºf vºſſº ##### º a.j. - - - º - the throne, and the arm-chair. plate . furniture. plate . the throne, and the arm-chair. the stall. — the stool. while appearing to stand; hence the significant name of these sup- ports, “miserere”. the backs of the hinder row of seats form a screen; and are usually decorated with carving, intarsia, &c.; and are furnished with a canopy. in front of the seat, there is generally a kneeling-stool. where there are several rows of seats, the prayer- desks of the one row serve at the same time as the backs of the next lower row. when the front rows are interrupted by passages leading to the hinder rows, the stall-ends are richly decorated. a large number of magnificent stalls of the gothic, and still more of the renascence period, have been preserved in england, germany, france, italy, and elsewhere, to enumerate them all would take too long. enormous pains have frequently been lavished on these works. rich ornamental and architectural motives alternate with represen- tations from bible history and the legends of the saints; secular and satirical compositions are also no rarity; so that stalls are altogether of high importance for the history of art as well as of civilisation. to exemplify what has been said, the plate gives a few examples, which are far from being among the most sumptuous. plate . the stall. . sta. maria novella, florence, decorated with intarsias, by baccio d'agnolo, end of the th century, (teirich). . side-view, and section of above. . laurentian library, florence, beginning of the th century, said to be by michelangelo, (gewerbehalle). . side-view, and section of the central row, great church, dortrecht, dutch renascence. . modern french, convent of elisabeth, fourvières near lyons, ar- tect leo, (raguenet). the stool. (plate .) the simplest seat is the taboret or stool, which is the chair without a back. as our plate shows, it has been in use from the earliest times. the most primitive, and at the same time the most stable, is probably the round seat with three legs; the egyptian example, (fig. ), may be regarded as the prototype of the modern cobbler's-stool. the plasterer's-stool, which has only one leg, is in- deed still simpler; and bears some resemblance to our modern walking. stick camp-stools. the four-legged taboret is generally square, and possesses the same features as the lower part of a chair. it is made w‘th or without upholstery, and with or without foot-rails. here, furniture. plate . the stall. furniture. rºº-ººrº pº - fºº nº. the stool. plate . meyer, handbook of ornament. the stool. — the folding-chair. too, we may group, the “bisellium", or roman double-stool, which was granted as a distinction, and was mostly made of metal (fig. ). box- stools, supported on boards instead of legs, are furnished with an opening in the seat to enable them to be moved. the garden-seats of burned and glazed clay, introduced from china (fig. ) are made without backs; and, from their round or polygonal fundamental plan, are classed with the taborets; also the upholstered and draped treatment (fig. ), which is sometimes applied to a commode. the revolving-stool, which is chiefly employed in an office or for performers of music, permits of lateral movement, and adjustment to different heights as required (figs. and ). this is effected by means of a screw. plate . the stool. . egyptian, british museum. . egyptian, (ménard et sauvageot). . etruscan, (ménard et sauvageot). . assyrian. . greek, vase-painting. . greek, vase-painting. . roman bisellium, bronze, covering of the seat omitted, pompeii. . bisellium of l. m. faustus, tomb of naevoleia tyche, pompeii. – . modern. . chinese garden-seat. . modern, (gewerbehalle). . modern music-stool. . modern. . modern revolving-stool. the folding-chair. (plate .) the idea of a chair which could be folded-together so as to take up less room, and be more conveniently transported, is an old one. the principle is found as early as the time of ramses iii in the egyptian chair shown on plate . . the folding-chair is common in the antique, either with four legs combined and joined- together like a saw-horse (figs. , , and ), or with crossing struts combined to form a ribbed chair. antique folding-chairs of the for- mer kind (diphros okladias) are remarkable for invariably having claw feet, sometimes turned outwards, but usually inwards. the ribbed chair, which recurs in the middle ages and the renascence, scarcely admits of decoration, and is, therefore, mostly plain. furniture. the folding-chair. plato . % the folding-chair. – the bench. the folding-chair may be a stool, a chair, or an arin-chair. sometimes it can be folded-up as it stands, like our iron folding- chairs for use in the open air; sometimes it must be taken to pieces before it can be folded-up, like the chair shown on fig. . the most suitable material is metal (bronze or iron). folding-chairs of wood are very often so constructed as not to fold at all, but are merely imitations with the purpose overlooked (fig. ). the seat is fre- quently of bands, either textile or leather. where the seat is not flexible, it must be arranged to be moveable by means of hinges. thrones have been sometimes made like folding-chairs. we may . also mention: the camp-stools for tourists, sportsmen, painters, &c. the principles of decoration are sufficiently elucidated by the figures of the plate. plate . the folding-chair. egyptian, tomb of chambali, th dynasty. antique, (diphros okladias). greek, tomb of an agonothetes, found in krissa, (delphi). antique. mediaeval, nonnenberg, (mothes). mediaeval, miniature painting, representing king nabuchodonosor, th or th century, (viollet-le-duc.). mediaeval, bronze gilt, throne of dagobert, restored. mediaeval, bronze, th century, (viollet-le-duc.). renascence. . french renascence, sens cathedral, (raguenet). i : the bench. (plate .) the bench is an elongated seat, usually intended for several per- sons. in its simplest form, as a board with four legs, it was already known in antiquity. in the middle ages and the renascence, it was in general use; and was employed not only as a seat, but as a table, as is shown by such terms as “work-bench”, &c. the bench-seat was afterwards furnished with a back and arms, the back being fre- quently formed like the canopy over stalls (fig. ). it was uphol- stered with cushions and draped with textiles. the material is gene- rally wood; but in public buildings there are also benches made of stone. this latter material and iron, frequently combined with wood, are the most suitable for benches in the open air. a further variety is formed by the double-bench, with a back in the middle; this back is moveable, as shown in the example (fig. ). as the bench, in most cases, is intended for every-day use, it is generally undecorated. those of the middle ages are more the furniture - - - - - - - -- - --- #: + º - º: º º - - º in | º --- - - - | -- #! it." ill l --- | | - º- e. fº --> i - - sº- - . -*. se - - — - the sofa, and the couch. plate . . the table. decoration to be properly seen. where the top is decorated, the orna- mentation is flat, consisting of intarsia-work, incising, painting, &c. the size of the table varies according to the purpose for which it is intended; its height, on the contrary, is subject to little varia- tion, and is about ft. "|s ins. for ordinary tables. tables, with legs which could be adjusted to varying heights, were in use in the antique period, being required by the social life of that time; a similar arrangement may also be seen on some modern artists’ tables, which can not only be adjusted to different heights, but also allow the top to be slanted. the following remarks are from the point of view of history and style. the egyptian, assyrian, and persian tables, chiefly known to us from the representations of altars, have legs terminating in claws. this motive was also popular among the greeks and romans, with the difference that the latter nations permit the claws to rest directly on the ground, while the former support the claws upon small circular plinths. the legs of antique tables are frequently of bronze; they have a similar form with those of the tripod; and like them are adjustible, as already observed (fig. ). the table-tops are often of stone or wood. large rectangular tables with stone supports of rich workmanship, and round tables with three legs of marble, a considerable number of which are given on plates and , are well known to us from the excavations at pompeii. they were not dining-tables but state-tables which stood in the tablinum and atrium of roman houses. dining-tables of the modern form were unknown to the antique; even in the early greek period, while it was still the custom to sit at dinner, each diner had his own separate table; and the same custom continued in the later period when meals were taken in a recumbent posture. these little tables were lower than ours. we also find them in similar forms among the romans (fig. ), along with larger banqueting-tables, around three sides of which the sofas were ranged as shown l. the late roman period was one of lavish luxury; we are told, for example, of tables with legs of silver and ivory, and with table-tops of rare woods, &c. in- credible prices, up to £ , , were paid for a single choice top. the tables of the middle ages were generally rectangular or semicircular, rested on posts or trestles, were plain, and rather cumbrous. it is said of charlemagne, however, that he possessed three of silver, and one golden (?) table. beautiful and richly-designed tables of very different kinds have been preserved from the time of the renascence. of particularly frequent occurrence, are richly-carved side-trusses (fig. ), simpler forms of which were already in use in the gothic period (fig. ). in the barocco and rococo periods, the legs are curved, and the tops are of bold, arbitrary design (fig. ). the console-table is an invention of this period. it was also at this furniture. plate . the table. the table. — the writing-table. time that the dumb-waiter, came into general use. as far as art is concerned, our modern tables are mostly copies of old models. plate gives a small selection from the copious material. plate . the table. . antique, bronze, museum, naples, (raguenet). . antique, bronze, (ménard et sauvageot). roman, (kantharos of ptolemy). mediaeval, chronicle of louis xi, (viollet-le-duc.). late gothic, municipal collection of antiquities, freiburg, (schau- insland). renascence, with turned legs, french, castle of bussy - rabutin, (côte d'or). renascence, with carved side-trusses, french, (ducerceau). french, th century, garde-meuble, paris, (raguenet). modern, renascence style. modern. modern, french, paris, (raguenet). : : : the writing-table. (plate .) the peculiar construction of the writing-table removes it from the category of ordinary tables. in a certain sense it forms the transition to the cabinets, in the form in which it is now manu- factured. the writing-table is a product of modern civilisation. in earlier times, when writing was the privilege of the select few, the common table evidently served the purpose. it is also true that the old caligraphers, used special writing apparatus, either desks which could be rested on the knees (fig. ), or small tables, an example of which is given in fig. . but it was reserved for our much-writing modern time to invent special furniture for business and private use. the writing-table must not only serve for writing, but also as a receptacle for stationery, correspondence, writing-materials, &c. hence it is furnished with cupboards, drawers, pigeon-holes, and shelves. it is often furnished with side-cupboards below the table-top having a space between them for the legs of the writer. where the table has an upper part, which admits of a variety of constructions, as may be seen from the few examples of the plate, it is usually of lesser depth than the surface of the table so as to leave the ne- cessary room for writing. the same end is attained by leaving a space equal to the whole depth free between it and the table-top, as shown by fig. . the table-top is often covered with some textile material or with leather, to afford a soft surface for writing-upon the writing-table. — the cabinet. special varieties are formed by the double-writing-table for office use, the cylinder-desk, which can be closed after use by letting down a cylindrical flap, the secretaire, in which the table-top may be lifted up or locked, the lady's-writing-table, &c. plate . the writing-table. . mediaeval, (scriptionale) with inkhorn, intended to be placed on the knee, th century, portal of the church, vezelay, (viollet- le-duc.). . mediaeval, with double top, for raising, th century, abbey of saint-michel-en-mer, (viollet-le-duc). . modern, with eight legs and side drawers, (max schulz). . modern. modern. . modern, by w. hanau, (gewerbehalle). : c. cabinets. the cabinet. (plate .) cabinets were evidently a rare phenomenon in antiquity. the egyptians and the greeks were probably not acquainted with them at all; the romans seem to have possessed simple cabinets with two doors, if we may judge from occasional paintings; in any case, however, they were of no artistic importance. chests, of which we shall speak later on, were no doubt more frequent, and took the place of cabinets. it was the same in the early middle ages, in which we certainly find cabinets in churches and monasteries, but seldom in private houses. where they do occur, they show the hand of the carpenter rather than that of the skilled cabinet-maker. “the car- dinal feature of romanesque furniture is practicability; that the slow moving, serious spirit of that time paid but little regard to elegance was only natural: men had their virtues and their vices, but they were free from affections of the nerves” (georg hirth). cabinets be- came more common in the gothic period; and although the matched- board-work and the simple carving generally give the products of this time a certain rude appearance; still the architectural disposition of the members, and the bands and mounts, are effective. later gothic led to all kinds of extravagances, one of which is the lavish use of geometrical tracery, called “flamboyant" from its flame-like character. the revolutionary process, which marks the transition from gothic to renascence, finds striking expression in the group of cabinets. georg furniture. plate . the cabinet. furniture. plate . the sideboard. the sideboard. — the hanging-cabinet. the sideboard. (plate .) sideboards are a separate division. they are intended for the reception of articles used in the service of the table. wases and ornaments may also be placed upon them; and in many cases they are themselves decorative objects. in the middle ages they are com- paratively plain, and of invariable form; the ground-plan being an oblong or semi-octagon; they stand on legs, and have of an open space beneath, over which are the cupboards, with a flat top, (figs. and ). during the renascence, this traditional plan gave way to richer and more complicated constructions; the lower recess was fre- quently retained; instead of it or along with it, further recesses were added at the middle height or still higher; the top is con- structed as an independent member, often of smaller dimensions and recessed; and terraces of shelves with balaustered galleries for glasses and plates, form the conclusion of the whole. here, too, our modern times follow the old models. special requirements have given birth to special forms, such as the buffets in hotels, and waiting-rooms, which frequently form an integral part of the wainscot or architecture of the wall. plate . the sideboard. . renascence, german, with reminiscences of gothic, bavarian na- tional museum, munich. . renascence, side-view, st. lo, normandy, , south ken- sington museum, (musterornamente). – . modern, front and side-view, designed in the school of in- dustrial art, carlsruhe. – . ditto. . modern, by ph. niederhöfer, frankfort. mediaeval, (viollet-le-duc.). the hanging-cabinet. (plate .) hanging-cabinets also form a special subdivision. they differ from other cabinets in being of more modest dimensions, by being, for practical purposes, of less depth, and, as they are intended for suspension, by terminating in a console instead of in legs and base. for the rest, what has already been said of cabinets in general, will hold good of hanging-cabinets also. these are adapted to hold books, tobacco, &c., medicine, keys, correspondence, &c. meyer, handbook of ornament. furniture. plate . the hanging-cabinet. the hanging-cabinet. — the chest. — the desk, &c. plate . the hanging-cabinet. renascence, german, (formenschatz). modern, with intarsia panels, by dir. hammer, nuremberg. modern, architect crecelius, mainz. modern, by dir. götz, carlsruhe modern, by prof. haas, lucerne. : the chest. (plate .) chests are of older date than cabinets. we meet with them on antique vase-paintings, and among the objects found in pompeii. they have the form of boxes, prismatic or widening towards the top, with short legs and with rich mountings, of nailheads, &c. (fig. ). in the middle ages, the chest was a very popular piece of fur- niture. its form was mostly that of a prismatic box without feet, with delicate iron mounts, and all kinds of carving (figs. – ). very often chests were at the same time used as benches. the same form was retained by the renascence but differently decorated in accord- ance with the style of the time. besides this, we have numerous examples of smaller chests with feet and lids of pyramid form, richly decorated with carving, intarsia, ivory, and metal reliefs. these small caskets were chiefly used for jewelry, and as work-boxes, etc., for which purposes similar caskets are still manufactured. plate . the chest. . antique, pompeii, (ménard et sauvageot). . mediaeval reliquary, (viollet-le-duc.). . mediaeval bench-chest, th century ms. (viollet-le-duc). . gothic, carved chestnut wood with iron mounts and handles, th century, (viollet-le-duc.). . mediaeval, brampton church, england, (viollet-le-duc.). renascence, dutch, (l'art pour tous). . renascence, italian. . renascence, flemish, th century, (l'art pour tous). : : d. miscellaneous. the desk, &c. (plate .) the desk is a stand with a sloping top, on which books and other things may be placed. passing over reading-desks, music-desks, and other desks for secular use, which as a rule are left undecorated; we have the desks used in churches, e. g. the “prie-dieu", the lectern, &c., which are to some extent found of rich workmanship as early as * furniture. † plate . the chest. the desk, &c. — the clock-case, &c. the beginning of the middle ages. they are made of wood, or metal, or of both combined. we distinguish between single and double desks. the lectern is frequently supported on the back of an eagle with outspread wings, a design which is supposed to contain a reference to the evangelist s. john, whose symbol in the eagle. ecclesiastical desks eiter have a fixed position in the choir or chancel, or they are moveable. these latter were sometimes like a saw-horse and could be folded-up; in which case the slope was replaced by bands (fig. ). the upper part of fixed desks frequently revolves, and is furnished with sconces for lights. the easel is a sloping frame with three or four legs. the front and rear are often connected by hinges to enable the angle of the slope to be altered at will. the front is provided with a small board, which can be adjusted to different heights by pins or other mechanism. it is an invention of modern times; and in its usual undecorated, form is employed by painters, sculptors, &c. but it is often made as a decorative piece of furniture of superior finish, to hold pictures, portfolios, &c. the decoration in this case may consist of the sym- bols of art, as shown in fig. . plate . the desk, &c. . gothic, th century, base of wood, slope of wrought-iron, eagle and ball gilt, dragon painted green, s. simphorien, nuits, (viollet- le-duc). . mediaeval, san stefano, venice, (mothes). . renascence, marble, pisa cathedral, italian, (kunsthandwerk). . mediaeval, double-desk with revolving shaft, end of th century (viollet-le-duc.). . mediaeval, upper part of double-desk, (viollet-le-duc.). . renascence, folding stand, cathedral, s. gimignano, italian, (kunst- handwerk). . modern decorative easel, architect durm, (gewerbehalle). : : the clock-case, &c. (plate .) the clock-case, as a piece of furniture, is of comparatively recent date, for the invention of the clock with a train of wheels is itself not old; and for some time after their introduction clocks were manu- factured without cases or, at any rate, without cases of artistic importance. in the th century, cases for protecting the works against dust and for giving the clock a more pleasing aspect, begin to appear. the forms at first manufactured were chiefly two. the first is that of the old-fashioned tall hall-clock, something like the toilet-stands (figs. and ), the upper part accommodating the clock furniture. plate . the clock-case, &c. the clock-case, &c. — the bedstead, and the cradle. . toilet-stand, german renascence, , town-hall, ueberlingen, (gewerbehalle). - . toilet-stand, various coloured woods, german renascence, (formen- schatz). the bedstead, and the cradle. (plates — ) from the earliest to the present time, the bedstead has passed through many changes. in the egyptian and assyrian styles: we find metal bedsteads imitating the forms of animals (plate . , ); and sometimes arranged to fold up like a camp-bed (plate . ). those of the greeks and romans, which served partly as beds, and partly as couches, are of manifold forms. in addition to the four-legged bench (plate . ), we have benches with a head-board (plate . ), with head and foot board (plate . ), the latter being usually lower than the former, and others with head, foot, and back boards, like our modern sofas (plate . ). the materials are wood and metal, sometimes more precious materials, ivory, &c., as we learn from the examples found in pompeii. the same fundamental idea may be seen in the bedsteads of the earlier middle ages, which show traces of byzantine influence, and have richly-decorated, turned posts, and carved sides. the front was often furnished with an opening to allow of getting into the bed (plate . , ). at a later period the bedstead was furnished with canopied hangings suspended from special rods fixed to the wall. the renascence considerably enlarged the size; placed it on a podium; raised the head-board; and carried the legs higher to receive the tester or canopy-frame, which was then adorned with drapery and hangings. examples of this period have been preserved (plate . and ). in the barocco and rococo periods: textile materials pre- dominate, and the wooden frame is neglected. then the so-called “parade-beds" (plate , ) became fashionable. modern times again have generally simplified the form. the commonest is that with high foot and head-boards (the latter often to excess), and low sides. tester-bedsteads have passed out of fashion. the cradle seems to have been an invention of the middle ages. by means of pins the little box or trough-shaped bedsteads were fixed in a frame in which they were moveable; or the legs of the bedstead were replaced by curved battens which admitted of rock- ing (plate . and ). the cradles of the renascence are of similar form, often with raised end-boards, and rich carving. owing to sanitary objections, cradles have almost gone out of use. some- - furniture. ſº tºrs: ºnestºstatar tº ºsteº ------- º * - h : - º d º the bedstead, &c. plate . the bedstead, and the cradle. times cradles are made of metal rods, like a basket, with the head of the frame raised to support a canopy. plate . the bedstead, &c. egyptian, (ménard et sauvageot). egyptian collapsible camp-bedstead. greek, vase-painting, (ménard et sauvageot). roman, pompeian vase-painting, (ménard et sauvageot). mediaeval, ms. of the th century, (viollet-le-duc.). mediaeval, ms. of the th century, (hortus deliciarum of herrad of landsberg), (viollet-le-duc.). . chinese, (l'art pour tous). – . mediaeval cradles, (viollet-le-duc.). i plate . the bedstead, &c. . renascence, plantin museum, antwerp, (gewerbehalle). . renascence, french, cluny museum, paris, (l'art pour tous). . barocco, parade-bedstead, by daniel marot. . renascence, head-board of cradle, french, gilt ornaments on red ground (l'art pour tous). d. frames, &c. the term “framework” is a very inclusive one. every edging, border, and every rim of a plate, belongs to this group; but the follow- ing ten plates will contain only those features in which the frame is, to a certain extent, an end in itself, and a definite, characteristic whole. framework is useful in every branch of applied art; it is used in an immense variety of materials, and is treated in many different ways. plates – contain some important subdivisions selected from the entire group: these are frames of architectural character; frames (strictly so-called) for pictures, mirrors, &c., tablets, typo- graphical borders, and the borders of dials, plates, &c. it is highly interesting to pursue the rise of framework on an architectural basis, its gradual transformation and its adaptation to the products of art industry. for this, however, we refer the reader to the remarks of semper (der stil, §§ et seqq.). we will only make the following observations from the point of view of style: framework, in the sense in which it is here understood, only occurs rarely and sporadically in the older styles, the antique and the middle ages. it was reserved for the renascence to cultivate this field, and to attain the highest possible results. it cannot, however, be denied that occasionally it was exaggerated and illogical. a frame must, above all things, have some relation and proportion to the object to be framed. to make a frame, and put it where there is nothing to be framed, is illogical. and yet we find in the late renascence, and in the barocco and rococo periods, countless examples which, so far as their application goes, have no other object than the de- coration of empty spaces. the architectural frame. the architectural frame. (plate – .) by architectural frames we mean those which are used in architecture, and those which, although applied in other branches, such as furniture, show an architectural derivation. these are: the framings of doors, windows, panels, tablets, medallions, niches, soffits, &c. in furniture they are the border-like ornaments which serve as a framing to panel-ornaments; but which are also very often used merely as decoration, without having any object to frame. there are two classes of frames: one which is mon-axial, with external or- naments at the top and bottom, to emphasize the vertical attitude; and one which is bi-axial, for application on horizontal surfaces. in the former class: the lower ornament has the general shape of a suspended triangle. this expresses the idea of supporting like a console; and is a free-ending down-wards. the other of these has the general shape of the erect triangle; making a cresting feature, and is the free-ending upwards. frames of this class are shown on plate , figs. , , , and . in the second class of frames: the space to be enclosed, be it a circle, square, or oblong, is surrounded by an ornament which is symmetrical on all sides without regard to top and bottom. frames of this class are shown on figs. – of plate , and figs. , and of plate . these two principles are not always so strongly marked as in the examples given; and sometimes they are combined; but as a rule the one or the other will always pro- dominate. plate . the architectural frame. . gable-opening of a dormer-window, rouen, french, th cen- tury, (l'art pour tous). tablet, modern, in the style of the italian renascence. pedestal, italian renascence, genoa, (owen jones). door-panel, (architektonisches skizzenbuch). stove-tile, castle of wülfingen near winterthur, th cen- tury, (kunsthandwerk). . desk in s. giorgio maggiore, venice, italian, renascence. . coffer, cupola of the dagobert tower, baden-baden, german, : renascence. – . pulpit, magdeburg cathedral, german, – , (gewerbe- halle). . door of cabinet, in the style of the german renascence, (formenschatz). . door of a sideboard, louvre, paris, renascence. frames. the architectural frame. plate . frames. the mirror-frame, &c. plate . * the mirror-frame, &c. — the strap-work frame. doubt that the metallic frame tends to enhance the effect of coloured pictures. porcelain and glass have also been used as materials for frames; but their propriety will always be questionable. in addition to outline and style of decoration: an important part is played by the amount of projection of the frame. the effect of a picture, which appears to be recessed behind a bevel-frame, is very different from that of one which seems to be brought into relief by a torus - moulding. the fundamental form of the frame is usually oblong, either figure-wise or landscape-wise; circular, elliptic, or square frames, are rarer. sometimes the outer shape of the frame differs from the inner shape (plate . , ). in the barocco period, frames received a number of arbitrary curved forms; as shown in on plate , fig. . plate . the mirror-frame, &c. – . german, th century, berlin, (kunsthandwerk). – . french, angle-ornaments of wall-panels, old castle of bercy, near paris, th century, (raguenet). barocco, witn bracket, by paul decker, (formenschatz). - rococo, (formenschatz). — . french, louis xvi, by la londe, (wessely). — . french, louis xvi., by delafosse, (raguenet). ; plate . the mirror-frame, &c. – . renascence, (raguenet). – . italian renascence, florence, (gewerbehalle). . modern, (gewerbehalle). . modern, by prof. schick, carlsruhe. . modern, by the architect huber, frankfort. the strap-work frame. (plates – .) when the frame is cut into fantastic shapes and bands, which interlace and curl, like leathern straps; then it is termed the strap- work frame. it is much used, in the later renascence, for shields, tablets, &c.; and is a characteristic of the elizabethan style. foliage, palmettes, festoons and garlands of fruit, fluttering ribbons, cherub- heads, &c. are frequently added. strap-work was an invention of the renascence; and it is extremely common, especially in the later years of that period. this kind of frame-work is frequently used, not as a frame, but for mere decorative purposes, so that the fields to be framed are left as empty spaces. strap-work appears in architecture, sepulchral monuments, and epitaphs; on medals and coins; in cabinet- frames. the strap-work frame. plate . frames. plate . the strap-work frame. the strap-work frame. — the typographical frame. work, heraldry, jewelry, the decoration of books, &c., and the minor arts in general. the arrangement is usually symmetrical; but this was abandoned in the rococo period in favour of unsymmetrical and picturesque arrangements, as shown in plate , fig. . plate . the strap-work frame. – . renascence, bronze tablets, cemetery of s. john, nuremberg, (gewerbehalle). – . renascence, th century, french, (l'art pour tous). – . renascence, new castle, baden-baden, – . . renascence, national library, paris, (raguenet). . modern, french, book ornament. plate . the strap-work frame. . renascence, french. . renascence, from “civitates orbis terrarum”, published by p. von brackel, cologne, , (ysendyck). rococo, louvre, paris, (raguenet). rococo, french, corner of a wall, (raguenet). rococo, french. . modern, by dir. kachel, carlsruhe. modern, french, (liénard). modern. i the typographical frame. (plates – .) we find numerous framework - motives in the decoration of books and documents; and though they have become more general since the invention of printing, we find them in the manuscripts of the middle ages. the title-pages were framed or bordered; it was also a favourite practice to border the headings; initials are some- times treated in this way; and printers'-marks, and head and tail- pieces are often designed with strap - work. old books are often richly decorated with such things; and artists of the highest rank often lent their aid to this style of decoration. after the sobriety which ruled in the first half of this century, our modern times have devoted increased attention to this branch. breaches of taste are still committed in this direction, principally because factory-made blocks, borders, and rules, are combined without judgment in typography. not only books, but also diplomas, addresses, ball-pro- grammes, dinner and business-cards, labels, book-plates, and similar things are furnished with artistic borders. the principles of decoration, and the motives employed, are very varied; and great freedom is al- frames. the typographical frame. plate . the typographical frame. — the strap-work tablet. lowed. when architectural forms appear, they are treated lightly and playfully; and are often resolved into all manner of strap-work (plate . , ). plate . the typographical frame. . border, by johann sadler, – , flemish, renascence, (guichard). . border, by hans holbein, (guichard). . border, by j. wiericx, th century, flemish, renascence, (l'art pour tous). . printer's-mark, (giacomo cornetti of venice), italian, renascence, , (l'art pour tous). . ditto, (giovanni guarisco, venice, ). . ditto, (ex typographia jacobi staer, ). . ditto, (a. quantin, paris, ). plate . the typographical frame. . german, tablet from the triumphal entry of the emperor maxi- milian by hans burkmair, ( – ). . french, renascence, th century, lyons, (l'art pour tous). . modern, by max läuger, carlsruhe. . modern, by rudolf seitz, munich. the strap work tablet. (plate ) examples of strap - work, designed for use in some of the minor arts, which serves not as a frame but as the actual tablet, are shown in the plate. figures and are clock-cases; and are for goldsmiths' work; and are wrought-iron signs; and are suitable ornaments for stamped-leather, and inlaying; fig. is an escutcheon; and nos. and are book-mounts. the series might easily be increased; but these examples will suffice, as it would lead us too far to treat each of these classes in detail. plate . the strap-work tablet. . clock-case, hammered metal, french, renascence. . clock-case, stamped metal, modern. – . decoration of escutcheons, snuff-box lids, &c., by wilhelm visscher, th century. – . wrought-iron signs, modern. . book-cover, th century, french renascence, (l'art pour tous). . modern, (gewerbehalle). the strap-work tablet, border, and margin. . metal mounts for the cover of an album, modern. . wrought-iron escutcheon, german, th century, national museum, munich. . centre-piece of bookbinding, by dir. c. graff, dresden. the strap-work border, and margin. (plate .) to those products of art, which frequently receive an additional exterior border or margin, must further be reckoned plates and dishes. so far as they are included under pottery, the border usually has a smooth unbroken edge; the material scarcely admitting of a freer treatment of the rim. it is different when the object is of metal; in this case, the rim may be decorated with pierced-work; and the outlines may undergo a richer and more vigorous treatment (figs. and ), in which the framework forms a free-ending outwards. plate . the strap-work border, and margin. . renascence, majolica, gewerbemuseum, berlin, (gewerbehalle). . renascence, majolica, italian, (racinet). . renascence, limoges, by pierre raymond, th century, (racinet). – . modern, by placido zuloaga, eibar, spain, (gewerbehalle). the pin. the pin. (plate .) the pin is a toilet article of very general use, particularly in primitive times. according to its application, it is either a hair-pin or a dress-pin. its form may be referred to three fundamental types. the first has a cylindrical or slightly conical stem, pointed like a thorn at one end, and terminated at the other by a knob or some other finial (figs. – ); it is used principally as a hair or breast pin, the stem in the former case being sometimes split like a fork (figs. – ). the materials are chiefly metals, bone, and horn; the head and the stem may be of different materials, as in the modern glass-headed pin. the handsomest examples of this class are to be found in the antique, which gave this simple object a great variety of form. the east also furnishes us with original forms, as shown by the japanese examples (figs. – ). the second class is that of the fibula, the brooch or safety-pin. these pins consist of two parts, a disc or hoop - shaped upper-part connected with the actual pin by elastic spirals or by a hinge, the point of the pin being held and secured by a catch like a hook or sheath. brooches are always used for garments; and, in the antique, supplied the want of buttons. they were in common use up to the middle ages, as shown by the numerous finds in greece, italy, and scandinavia. the hoop is commoner than the disc; and more practical, as it afforded room for the gathered-up folds of the garment. the decoration is of the utmost variety; certain forms, such as the spiral (fig. ), are conventional. the material is always metal, mostly bronze, more rarely a precious metal. modern times make use of these pins only in the form of the plain wire safety-pin, and the brooch, in which latter the disc replaces the hoop (fig. ). double-pins form a third class. two or three (and occasionally more) pins of the first class are connected by means of chains or spangles, usually to serve as an ornament for the bosom (fig. ). this form, was popular in ancient scandinavian art; and is in use up to the present day in some national costumes. plate . the pin. — . roman, and etruscan, campana collection, (l'art pour tous). — . roman, found in pompeii. . anglo-saxon triple breastpin, found in lincolnshire, archaeolo- gical institute. . alemannic, bronze, united collections, carlsruhe. — . th century, (guichard). – . modern, japanese, metal, bone, &c. united collections, carls- ruhe. the pin. — the button. . modern, french, filigree work with pearls and brilliants, (gewerbehalle). – . antique, bronze, united collections, carlsruhe. – . etruscan, gold. . etruscan, spiral-brooch, bronze, united collections, carlsruhe. . modern, (gewerbehalle). the button. (plate ) the objects, which we have here classed as buttons, serve va- rious purposes. they appear as pendants to necklets and similar things, as bullae (an antique pendant like an amulet with symbolic signifi- cance), as ornaments of belts, garments, harness, &c., and as buttons, in the strict sense of the term, for fastening garments. according to its uses, the button takes the form of the sphere, the hemisphere, or the disc. as a pendant it resembles a drop with the character of a free-ending (fig. ). one end is then furnished with a ring by which it may be suspended or sewed-on. the double-buttons or links, shown in figs. , and form a special subdivision. the principal materials are again the metals, enamelled, damaskeened, set with gems, or as filigree-work. buttons are also manufactured in ivory, mother- of-pearl, amber, glass, and similar materials; discs of wood are covered with silk, and metal threads, adorned with gold-foil, &c. standard examples are furnished by the antique, the renascence, and many modern national costumes, while the modern wholesale factory-made button has scarcely any artistic value. our examples have been taken from the periods named above; and are mostly the same size as the originals. plate . the button. . antique, double-button, gold, united collections, carlsruhe. — . etruscan, gold with gems and pearls. , , , , , , , , , , , , and . buttons and double-buttons of various origin, of metal, with filigree- work, enamelled, &c. in the possession of prof. marc rosenberg, carlsruhe. – . renascence, gold, enamelled and set with pearls, regalia, berlin, (luthmer). . renascence, from a belt. . modern, filigree. . renascence, enamelled, national museum, munich. and . buttons by a frankfort maker of the th century, in the collection of mr. j. werneck, frankfort, silk, gold- thread and foil, (kunsthandwerk). jewelry. plato . the button. * the button. — the ring. . renascence, the gallery, schleissheim, (luthmer). and . renascence, from pictures in wörlitz and gotha, (luthmer). . indian, silver filigree, from sumatra, united collections, carlsruhe. . modern, pendant of a necklet, (gewerbehalle). the ring. (plate .) the finger-ring is universally employed as an article of personal adornment; and it is one which has been worn by both sexes at al- most all times, and in almost all countries. the manner of wearing it was determined partly by fashion, partly by edicts. sometimes it was considered good taste to wear only a single ring, at other times both hands were covered with rings; it is worn sometimes under, and sometimes over the glove; plain, comfortable forms give way to monstrous shapes; sometimes it is purely ornamental, sometimes it has a symbolic significance, as in the wedding ring (a legacy of heathendom to christianity); sometimes it is a token of dignity, as in the fisherman's ring of the pope, and of emperors, kings, &c. the form is manifold. the signet - ring, formed partly of a single piece (fig. ), partly of a hoop in which a cut gem revolves (fig. ), occurs in the egyptian style. spiral rings with the serpent motive (figs. and ), and rings opening on one side (fig. ), are not rare in the antique. besides these: other forms appear, which are still popular. sometimes the upper side was broadened to receive some ornament or a gem (figs. , , , ), a method which was used in the renascence (figs. – ), while the middle ages preferred cylindrical, ribbon - like bands (figs. and ), and architectural motives (fig. ). it was reserved for modern times to give the wedding- ring its smooth, convenient, but artistically unimportant form. the predominant material is gold. niello, enamel, pearls, and gems, are used for its further decoration. the ring has frequently given rise to artistic freaks, e. g. where two or three separate rings are so constructed that they may be interlocked. plate . the ring. — . egyptian, signet, (ménard et sauvageot). roman, signet, found in the crimea. . egyptian, with enamel and two horses in free relief. . egyptian, with pierced work, (racinet). – . greek. – . roman, found in the crimea. etruscan, gold, vulci, (blümner). jewelry. the chain. plate . jewelry. the necklace. plate . the necklace. — the bracelet. to find several necklets of different circumferences worn one above the other; and producing a good effect. metal, precious stones, pearls, &c., play the chief part in necklaces. plate . the necklace. . egyptian, with enamelled pendant, (ménard et sauvageot). . egyptian, with golden flies (symbolic), (ménard et sauvageot). . antique, with stamped sheet-metal ornaments, found in rhodes, (ménard et sauvageot.) . egyptian, (ménard et sauvageot). . etruscan, gold, campana collection, paris, (l'art pour tous). . oriental, gilt silver filigree, (l'art pour tous). . old italic, neck-ring, bronze, united collections, carlsruhe. . barbaric, neck-ring, iron, from the white nile, united collections, carlsruhe. . from portrait, henry vi, of england. . from portrait, , municipal museum, cologne, (luthmer). . filigree. . modern, (gewerbehalle). the bracelet. (plate .) the bracelet, which is now exclusively an article of feminine adornment, was formerly worn by men also, not merely on the wrist as at the present day, but on the arm too. but even the antique considered this custom, and that of wearing bangles on the ankles, to be a relic of barbaric times. bracelets are either closed rings or bands (figs. and ); or they are open on one side (figs. , , , and ); or rolled spirally (figs. and ); or, finally, the bracelet may be a closed chain with a greater or lesser number of links (figs. and ). another division is formed by the twisted example (fig. ). as the bracelet is an object of some size, it is, more fre- quently than other ornaments, made of silver rather than of gold; the antique shows a preference for bronze. plate . the bracelet. egyptian, pierced-work, (ménard et sauvageot). assyrian, bronze, louvre, paris, (blümner). — . roman, found in pompeii. antique, (ménard et sauvageot). bronze, found near ladenburg, united collections, carlsruhe. spiral wire, united collections, carlsruhe. bronze, united collections, carlsruhe. jewelry. - &-º sºº s *- - ºzzº - the bracelet. plate . the bracelet. — the girdle, the buckle, and clasp. . bronze, found near ladenburg, united collections, carlsruhe. . from portrait, th century, gotha, (luthmer). . venetian, th century, (mothes). . javanese, black wood, united collections, carlsruhe. – . modern egyptian, silver, grand ducal landesgewerbehalle, carlsruhe. . modern, (gewerbehalle). . modern, by dir. a. ortwein, granz, (gewerbehalle). the girdle, the buckle, and clasp. (plate .) the girdle was originally used by men to suspend weapons from; and by women to confine the clothing at the waist; later-on, it was worn merely as an ornament, or to carry pouches, fans, scissors, &c. its form is either that of the chain-girdle (comp. plate ), or bands of leather or textile material are decorated by ornaments of metal sewed or threaded-on. particular attention is usually given to the fastening, which is generally a clasp or buckle (figs. , , and ). the agraffe (lat. agrappa) or hook, and the buckle are applied to other purposes besides fastening girdles; the former are used as fastenings for garments; the latter on the straps of weapons, harness, &c. the buckle is complete in itself, consisting of a ring or hoop with a movable pin; and the fastening is done by pushing the pin through a hole in the leather or textile band (figs. , and ). the clasp consists of two parts, generally symmetrical, one of which can be hooked into the other (figs. – ). clasps and buckles are both old inventions; and are found in very early times. as they are objects of practical use rather than ornament, they are more often made of the common than of the precious metals. the terminations of clasps are mostly designed as free - endings, which gives them a certain similarity with decorated hinges. plate . the girdle, the buckle, and clasp. . greek girdle, gold and hyacinths, tomb in ithaca. . ancient italic or roman buckle, bronze, united collections, carlsruhe. . roman clasp, silver, (ménard et sauvageot). . alemannic, buckle, bronze, found near mosbach, united col- lections, carlsruhe. mediaeval buckle, scandinavian, (weiss, kostümkunde). gallic girdle, st. germain museum, (l'art pour tous). gothic buckle, th century, from a picture, municipal mu- seum, cologne, (luthmer). ; the pendant — the ear-ring. . renascence, by hans brosamer, (formenschatz). . renascence, by hans holbein. – . renascence, by hans holbein, (formenschatz). . renascence, (luthmer). . renascence, th century, silver coin, set. . renascence, by julius bernic, (luthmer). modern, (blätter für kunstgewerbe). – . modern, (zeitschrift des kunstgewerbevereins). . modern, (gewerbehalle). . modern, french. the ear-ring. (plate ) the custom of wearing ear-rings as articles of adornment seems to be of ancient oriental origin; and to have penetrated through asia minor to the civilised countries of the west. it has been practised from the earliest times by the arabs, in spain, and in sicily. both sexes, among the ancient germans and gauls, decked themselves with ear-rings. as the wearing of them implies either that the ear must be pierced or the ornament hung on to the ear, neither of which processes are particularly aesthetic; the custom has fallen out of fashion, and become obsolete. the forms in general are two: the ring and the drop. the rings are either not quite closed (figs. , , , and ); or they are fastened by a catch of one kind or ano- ther (figs. , , , , and ). drops usually terminate in a wire loop by which they may be suspended (figs. , , , , , , and ). as these objects must be light, they are generally of delicate form, and modest dimensions, manufactured of the precious metals, in sheet or wire-filigree. as pendants they have the character of free-endings, frequently consisting of different moveable members. the standard examples are furnished by the antique and the east. plate . the ear-ring. – . egyptian, (racinet). – . etruscan, louvre, paris, (racinet). . greek, in the form of a siren, gold, found in ithaca. – . roman, national library, paris, (l'art pour tous). . bronze, found near niedereggenen, baden, united collections, carlsruhe. . old frankish. . renascence, from portrait, castle at gotha, (luthmer). . louis xvi, gold of various colours, (racinet). – . modern, by dir. a. ortwein, graz, (gewerbehalle). – . modern, tunis, united collections, carlsruhe. jewelry. plate . miscellaneous jewelry. miscellaneous jewelry. miscellaneous jewelry. (plate .) finally, we may mention a number of articles of adornment which, from their nature, are less generally used; either because they are worn only by certain persons, or that, as objects for daily use they only fall within the category of decorative objects when they are richly finished. among them are decorations for the head, for example, the diadem, bridal and other chaplets, insignia of orders of knighthood, combs, scent-bottles, seals, needle-cases, &c. the so-called “chatelaine", was in common use in the middle ages; and has been revived lately. it is suspended from the belt or some other part of the dress; and is furnished with hooks, from which bags, keys, fans, scissors, watches, scent-bottles, &c. may be hung (figs. , , and ). we may also add spangles, which were sewed as a decoration on garments in the antique; and sometimes in later periods (fig. ). we give a few examples of these objects, without any pretension to system or exhaustiveness. plate . miscellaneous jewelry. . egyptian diadem, gold incrusted with gems and enamel, with the badge of king amesis. . greek head-dress, gold-plate, found in mykenae, (blümmer). . greek spangle, ornament of a dress from mykenae, (blümmer). greek diadem, gold, found near kertsch, hermitage, st. peters- burg, (kunsthandwerk). renascence, smelling-bottle, as pendant. . barocco, smelling-bottle. – . french chatelaines, th century, (racinet). – . barocco, seals, exhibition, carlsruhe, . . modern, needle-case, in anchor-form as a pendant, private - collection, carlsruhe. . modern, comb, (gewerbehalle). . modern, french, chatelaine, (gewerbehalle). . modern, chatelaine, by dir. a. ortwein, graz, (gewerbehalle). * f. heraldry. heraldry has so many points of contact with ornament that it cannot be omitted from a work that deals with the whole art of decoration. heraldry includes both the science and the art of armorial bearings. the former contains the rules of framing and bearing coats of arms; the latter is the practical art of “blazoning" or designing and depicting such coats. armorial bearings are distinct badges, fixed according to certain principles, which individuals, families and corporations are entitled to bear in perpetuity. armorial bearings arose during the crusades, towards the end of the th century. the elevation of the nobles into a corporation, the addition of the family or surname to the baptismal name, the peculiar usages of chivalry, the custom of military games and tournaments, are all closely connected with the introduction of armorial bearings. heraldry. as a science did not arise till a later time (about the th century). armorial bearings, whose origin is contemporary with the custom of wearing such badges, and whose right to be borne was afterwards tacitly recognised, are distinguished from the later bearings, the right to bear which was granted by letters-patent from princes or their plenipotentiaries. besides the nobles, the right of armorial bearings was possessed by other patrician, though not noble, families. their bearings have frequently arisen from monograms, family tokens, and trade-marks. the inscription on a coat of arms of the fuggers of the year runs: “dises zaichen, wirt vlrich fugger, vorbemelten hansen fuggers bruder, gepraucht haben, welchs hernach jacob fugger, des namens der erst, angenommen, und das sambt seinen heraldry. sünen, bis auf aufpringung des wappens, gefiert hat" (this token was no doubt used by ulrich fugger the brother of the above-named hans fugger: it was afterwards adopted by jacob fugger, the first of the name, and borne by him and his sons until the assumption of the coat of arms). the marshalling of armorial bearings was the duty of the heralds, whose official badge was the tabard and the staff. the heralds' colleges still exercise control over armorial bearings on behalf of the state. including the coats of families, towns, corporations, and offices, there are probably about , coats of arms in existence. coats are called allusive or punning when they suggest. (in whole or in part), the name of the bearer. the pikes on the coat of the lucy family, the hirondelles of the arundells of wardour, are familiar instances in english heraldry. we may distinguish three principal epochs of armorial bearings: ( ) the period from the th to the th century, in which the shield alone with its badge formed the arms, which is the period of the evolution of heraldry; ( ) the period from the th to the th century, in which shield, helmet, and crest formed the arms, in which painted shields and helmets were really worn, which was the golden age of heraldry; ( ) the period from the th century to the present time, in which the wearing of shields and helmets with badges was discontinued; and heraldry creased to be a living art, which is the period of decay, in which arbitrariness, ignorance, and a pedantic ad- herence to antiquated principles have taken the place of the living art. from the point of view of style we may distinguish: — early gothic, late gothic and renascence arms; as also those of the ba- rocco and rococo periods, and modern times. the general direction of style has always had an influence on heraldry; but the developement of architecture is on the whole always some twenty years in advance. the developement of heraldry was different in different countries; and even the modern english, french, german, and other systems, differ from one-another in several essential points. here, of course, we cannot go minutely into the details of the subject. we shall only give, in all brevity, what is absolutely necessary. the plates will deal with the colonrs or tinctures, the shapes and divisions of the shield, the charges, the helmet and its accessories; the badges of rank and dignity; and pageantry. those who wish to study heraldry more deeply, will find an ample lite- rature at their disposal; since bartolus de saxoferrato took up the subject in the middle of the th century, more than enough has been written about heraldry. as accompaniments and supplements to study and teaching we may rocommend the excellent work of f. warnecke: heraldisches handbuch, illustraded by doepler the younger; the anleitung zur praktischen darstellung und ausführung heraldischer ornamente für das gesamte kunstgewerbe, by detlav heraldry. or. n proper. # argent. gules. later tinctures. azure. sable. purpure. ash-grey. murrey. furs. j -— * sº lº the heraldic colours or tinctures. original tinctures. ( metals – colors.) vert. tawny. older. ermine. erminois. kürsch. vair. vairper pale. countervair. dam as keenings. * ° .. . . .”:%; º::::: & sº º ºx :…'s divisions of the shield into quarters or fields. * a. b. ab. upper margin. cd. lower margin. . . ac. dexter margin. . bd. sinister margin. . - . . . chief. * . . . fesse. . . . . base. . . . . . dexter tierce c s- l– . . . . . pale. ~~ . . . sinister tierce. ii. . dexter chief canton. chief point. . sinister chief canton. . dexter flank. . centre point. . sinister flank. . dexter canton of base. base point. sinister canton of base. honour point. . nombril point. plate . tinctures, and divisions of the shield. tinctures, and divisions of the shield. – shapes of the shield. the shield sometimes bears a smaller shield. the large shield which bears the smaller is called the escutcheon. the smaller shield in the centre is termed the inescutcheon. the inescutcheon some- times bears a third shield which is then said to be “sur le tout du tout”. the smaller shields have the same shape as the large shield. the chief and the dexter side of the shield are the most honourable parts; and preference is given to the angle of the dexter chief or canton. in blazoning a coat: the description always starts from this point. shapes of the shield. (plate .) the shape of the shield is very varied; and is chiefly deter mined by the period in which it originated. the oldest shape is the triangular or “heater-shaped” shield (fig. ). it was in use in the th, th and th centuries. on seals, it is first one-half and at a later time one-third the height of a man; the ratio of its height to its breadth is about : . in the th century shields straight at the top and rounded at the bottom (we may term them half- round) began to appear; and after them shields pointed at the bottom (fig. ). this shape, and the th century shapes which were deve- loped from it (figs. – ), were probably never actually borne; but are merely heraldic. at the end of the th century the tilting- shields begin to make their appearance, their shape being based on that of the shields used in tournaments (figs. – ). the indenta- tions in the sides of these are suggested by the “bouche” or place for the lance on shields intended for actual use. the tilting- shield is considerably smaller than the triangular-shield; it is about one-fifth the height of a man. at the end of the th century the old shapes disappear, and make way for the german or strap- work shields. these latter were never in actual use, but are orna- mental inventions mostly based on the tilting shield. figs. – give a number of such shields belonging to different periods of the renascence epoch. shapes like figs. and are very common in italy at that time. elliptic, circular, and almond-shaped shields are not rare, especially in the barocco period, a time in which heraldry was treated in a somewhat arbitrary fashion. of shapes that are specifically modern, we may mention: figs. and , the former of which was used for the arms of great britain & ireland; and of france; while the latter is the best adapted for the blazoning of complicated coats. the lozenge-shape (fig. ) is especially the shield of ladies; in france, where it has been common since the th century, it is frequently surrounded with a knotted twisted girdle. hapes of the shield. – ordinaries. plate . the shape of the shield. – . triangular, pointed, and half-round. – . simple shapes, renascence. – . simple shapes, tilting-shields. – . italian renascence. – . elliptical, almond, and circular. – . modern. . lozenge-shaped. . german, michel müller, . . german, unknown master of the th century. . german, daniel lindtmair, . . german, jost amman, end of th century. . german, school of holbein, th century. . german, hans wägmann, , (warnecke). . german, th century. . german, th century, (formenschatz). ordinaries. (plate ) heraldic representations may be divided into ordinaries, and charges. the ordinaries are the geometrical figures which are formed when the shield is divided into different fields by straight or curved lines which extend to the margin of the shield. the number of such figures is infinite. plate contains a collection of the ordi- naries which most commonly occur. we shall not discuss each figure in detail. the following blazoning or description of the figures on the plate will, no doubt, give the reader all he requires to know. the blazoning begins from the upper dexter angle of each shield. plate . the ordinaries. per pale, sable and or. paly of four, argent and sable. . argent, the dexter tierce gules. . gules, a pale or. . argent, a pallet (narrower than a pale) sable. . per fesse, or and gules. . barry of five, azure and argent. or, a chief azure. . argent, a base gules. . argent, a base vert. ordinaries. . or, a fesse gules. . argent, a barrulet sable. . per pale; the dexter half argent, the sinister half per fesse azure and or. . per fesse; the upper half per pale sable and gules, the lower argent. . quarterly, or and azure. . checky of nine, vert and argent. . checky of twenty, or and gules. . quarterly: the st and th per pale, argent and gules; the nd and rd or. . per fesse, gules and argent, a pale counterchanged. . per pale, barry of five, or and azure, counterchanged. . paly of six, argent and sable, a fesse counterchanged. . or, a cross gules. . argent, a dexter canton sable. . azure, a chief point vair. . per bend, or and vert. . per bend sinister, argent and azure. . or, in the dexter chief a triangle sable. . argent, in the sinister base a triangle gules. . or, a bend gules. . bendy sinister of six, azure and argent. . per saltire, vert and argent. . per bend, the dexter half argent, the sinister per bend sinister. vert and or. . per bend sinister, bendy of six, sable and argent, counter- changed. . lozengy, argent and azure. . fusilly, argent and azure. . or, a pile azure. . azure, a pile argent, issuing from the sinister side. . gyronny of four, argent and gules, issuing from the dexter chief point. . or, a chevron vert. . chevronny of six, azure and argent. . party per pale and saltire, gules and argent. . gyronny of eight, or and azure. . argent, a gyron azure, moving from the dexter side. . per pall, sable, argent and gules. . per pall reversed, or, argent and azure. . argent, a pall gules. . pily barwise, argent and azure. . per fesse angled, argent and gules. . per fesse escartely, azure and or. ordinaries. – charges. . or, a pile indented sable, also per chevron indented, or and sable. . per bend indented, azure and argent. . per pale potented, argent and azure. . per fesse potented, or and gules. . per fesse dentilly, gules and aregnt. . per fesse nebuly, azure and argent. . sable, a chief engrailed or, also per fesse engrailed, or and sable. . argent, a pale raguly. . or, a bend indented. . argent, a bend sinister wavy azure. . azure, a cross engrailed or. . gules, four wolf's teeth argent, moving from the sinister side. . azure, a gurge issuing from the sinister base. . argent. charges. (plates – ) the second class of heraldic representations are charges. we distinguish natural, imaginative, and artificial charges, according as they belong to the kingdoms of nature, the heavenly bodies, phe- nomena of nature, or to fantastic forms; or again to art, trade, mechanics, &c. contrary to the ordinaries, whose outlines usually touch the edge of the shield, the charges usually stand free in the field, at any rate, on two or three sides, and fill the field as much as possible. the charges are all more or less conventionalised; and show conventional forms agreeing with the style of the times. atten- tion must be paid to this point, so that the unity of style may be preserved between shield and charges they are mostly shown in profile, and vigorously drawn and outlined. the tinctures, at least in older heraldry, are not those of nature, but one of the nearest heraldic tinctures, so that the idealisation extends not only to the form but also to the colour. complicated objects are often comparatively sim- plified; trees, for example, appear with few leaves and fruits, &c. some charges, such as the lion and eagle, are of extremely fre- quent occurrence; others the following are rarer. among animals the following are represented: — plate . . the lion (rampant) with open jaws and protruding tongue: the body lean, especially towards the hinder quarters; the tail curled upwards, natural or split, but not arbitrarily; the teeth, claws, &c. are gules on metal, or and argent on colors; the entire figure is generally or or gules, more rarely sable, and still more rarely azure. plate . charges. . . the rose, idealised as a rosette, single or double, in five to eight parts. the lily or fleur-de-lis, conventional, consisting of three petals, with or without stamens; used in art long before the birth of heraldry; common in french coats. in addition to the above: clover, nettle, water-lilies, grapes, pome- granates, fir-cones &c. plate . charges . . . and . . the most frequent imaginary figures and monsters are: . the griffin (rampant), with eagle's head and wings, lion's body, tail curved upward or downward, the upper and lower halves often of different colors. . the panther, similar to the griffin, but without wings, usually spitting flame (turned towards the sinister side). . the dragon, a winged reptile with two lion's paws or eagle's claws. (the wivern is similar, but with hinder feet.) . the dragon with wolf's jaws, serpent's body and fish-tail. . the two-headed eagle (an ordinary eagle with two heads turned away from each other, each with nimbus), the coat of the holy roman empire. . the seiren (an eagle with the bust of a virgin), the arms of nuremberg. . the mermaid (a naked female figure, terminating below the breast in a fish - tail), the figure is also found without arms and also symmetrical, with two tails curved upwards. - . the sea-lion, with the fore-part of a lion terminating in a fish- tail. of the heavenly bodies there occur: the sun, with face and sixteen rays, straight and wavy alternately; always gold. the moon, waxing or waning, with or without face (in the first case the crescent is argent and the face or). the star, with rays of five to eight points; or. less common are: comets, and the earth, with the lines of latitude longitude. among the phenomena of nature we have: the cloud, very conventional, argent or azure. the rainbow, gules, or, and azure (shown in the plate above a triple hill). meyer, handbook of ornament. heraldry. plate . forms of the helmet. helmet trappings. (plate , figs. – ); if the blazoning is with ordinaries: these are repeated on certain objects selected as crests. the principal of these objects are: horns, in pairs, curved as a crescent or a lyre, in later times broadened out at the ends like a mouthpiece, painted with the tinctures or ordinaries of the coat, surmounted with branches, &c. (plates . , . and ). wings, natural or artificial, singly or in pairs, displayed, or in profile; painted with the tinctures or ordinaries of the coat (plates . and ; . ). cushions and screens, round or square discs, painted with the blazoning of the coat, hung and surmounted with tassels, bells, and peacock's feathers (plate . ). caps, pointed and turned up, showing the colours and blazon- ing of the shield, the tips decorated with coronets, plumes, &c. (plate . ). quivers, cylindrical or conical tubes, painted with the colours of the shield, crowned with coloured feathers (plate . ). human beings, animals, and all kinds of artificial objects; the former often depicted as half-figures. we must refrain from entering into detail into the various relations, often full of meaning, between the crest and the shield; as an example we may refer to plate , , where the blazon of crossed arrows and pitcher on the shield are repeated as a quiver and a goblet in the hands of the maiden who forms the crest. the mantling is the connecting-link between the helmet and the shield. in the oldest times it was formed of cloth: at a later date covers of stiffened material, leather, metal-plate, &c., were used, the edges being cut-out into ornamental shapes. the same materials were also employed for the crest. during the renascence period: the mantling was cut into ribbon-like strips, each strip being treated independently like an artificial-leaf. the wreath is interposed between the crest and the helmet, (plate . , , ). it rarely has more or less than two tinctures. where the crest is directly connected with the helmet: the tinctures of the shield are correspondingly continued on the wreath. the mantling shows the tinctures of the coat counterchanged in such a way that the colour is usually visible outside, the metal inside. if it have four colours: the chief ones are on the dexter, the others on the sinister side. it should corre- spond in style with the rest of the arms: salades and heaumes require simple edges (plate . ); while tilting and vizored helmets require jagged or scalloped edges. heraldic accessories. * heraldic accessories. (plate .) under this title, we group such decorations as form do not an essen- tial part of the coat, but rather give an artistic finish to it. the prin- cipal are: supporters, tents, mottoes, &c. supporters are figures of human beings, or animals: angels, knights, ladies, savages, lions, griffins, &c. on old tombstones and the seals of knights, the possessor of the coat appears as the bearer of it. supporting angels are usually placed behind the shield (figs. and ). ladies, knights, savages, &c., stand at the side of the shield, either singly, or in pairs; and the same rule applies to ani- mals (figs. and ). tents are draperies in the form of ā baldacchino, serving as a background for the shield. the outside is generally purple, the in- side of ermine, and they are hung with golden tassels and fringes. such accessories are only suited to the coats of sovereigns, and sta- tes; and are of comparatively modern introduction. mottoes, war-cries, &c. are written on fillets or bands beneath or round the shield (fig. ). examples of such mottoes are the english “honi soit qui mal y pense", the american “e pluribus unum", or the wurttemberg “furchtlos und treu". there are also definite rules for the heraldic composition of a number of coats in one (for example, in a double coat the figures must be affronted, &c.); but we need not enter into, the details of these. the artistic execution is very various and arbitrary (fig. ). plate . heraldic accessories. . angel, as supporter, by h. j. gantinn, , (warnecke). . angel, as supporter, italian, th century, (formenschatz). . lady, as supporter, h. burckmair, triumphal procession of the emperor maximilian, (observe the repetition of the tinctures on the lady's dress, the crest, and the banner). griffins, as supporters, by hans burckmair, (formenschatz). coat, with mottoes, . composite coat, within a quatrefoil, dürer's school, (formenschatz). modern tent. coat of arms of the artists, designed by l. lesker. in conse- quence of an affront offered by the lords of rappoltstein to the artists employed in the building of strassburg minster, it is said that the emperor sigismund granted the artists, called the “yunkers of prague”, permission to bear the same coat of arms — or, three escutcheons azure — (martin crusii, schwäbische chronik). i º - gººſe º g. writing, printing, &c. (ornamental letters) the invention of writing dates back thousands of years before our era. to which nation it is to be assigned, cannot at present be fixed with any certainty. greek writing was developed from the phenician; and served, in its turn, as a basis for roman writing. from the roman writing, arose the occidental and scandinavian writings, as well as the runic. the latin script was introduced into germany contemporaneously with christianity. the early middle ages treated the shapes of letters in a some what arbitrary manner. by the side of the majuscles (or capital letters) appear the minuscles (or small letters, produced by the contraction and simplification of the former), (compare the letters e and m in alphabet on plate ). by the side of the upright and angular capital letters, appear the uncial letters with their round and freer shapes (compare e, m and u in alphabet on plate ). alongside of the perpendicular letters, the more convenient slanting or cursive letters begin to be employed. beside the uncial writing, the gothic period brought text-hands into use (plates , , and ). by this time the gradual trans- formation was so far advanced that at the first glance it is often im- possible to recognise the original connection. the more complicated the text-hands became, the more difficult they were to read; so that it must be considered a happy circumstance that the renascence period strove in many ways to simplify the texts, and to revive the old latin alphabet, ( on plate ). the invention of printing in the year had an important influence on the developement of the shapes of letters. the period of the decadence of the renascence writing, printing, &c. traced in writing. up to the th century the decorations of writing have almost exclusively the character of interlaced-work and fantastically-interlaced figures of animals; but from this period a vigorous plant decoration begins to be developed, eventually ter- minating, in later gothic, in the endless interlacing of confused lines. the renascence period prefers to set its initials in square frames; and these creations are among the most beautiful that writing has ever produced. the interlaced and artificial ornaments which after- wards became so common in typography, especially in the th and th centuries (plate . , and ), are either the invention of the calligraphists of this period, or are the transfer of their archieve- ments to typography. here, too, as in so many other things, modern times revert to the models of the most different older periods; rightly when good is selected, and wrongly when the objectionable is revived. over those sins of modern writing, which culminate in deforming our houses and the titles of our books with rows of shaded letters in all manner of possible and impossible places and positions, it is best to draw the charitable veil of silence. compared with these sins of style, those sentimental garlands of roses and forget-me-nots, into which the last century formed its lines, are tolerable. as regards the technical names of the kinds of letters now in general use: we can only say that they are so arbitrary that we shall do best to refrain altogether from attempting to enumerate them. whoever wishes for information on this point may be recommended to consult the specimen-book of some good type-foundry. attempts were early made to construct alphabets on a definite system; to base them on network, to determine the height and breadth of the entire letter, the dimensions of its component parts, &c.; among others dürer devoted himself to this task. space has not permitted us to reproduce all these constructions; but as a specimen we have given on plate the constructions of a few. the notation of numbers was introduced at the end of the middle ages. our numerals are an arabian invention, whence their name. plate shows two collection of numerals of old times which are not sensibly different from those now in use. it is well known that, before numerals were generally employed, recourse was had to the latin letters (roman numerals) for the indication of numbers. it is really remarkable that this latter apparatus, in spite of its unpractical character, has remained in use down to the present day. finally we may say a word or two about the monogram. this name is given to letters and interlacings of letters intended to replace or to indicate a name. it may be formed either by single ornamented letters, usually the initials of the first and family name (plate . – ), or by all the letters contained in the word (plate . ). it is not imperative that all the letters should be of the same size meyer, handbook of ornament. ornamental letters. plate . gothic uncial letters. old english letters. – old german letters, &c. plate . old english letters, &c. . old english text, tomb of richard ii, westminster abbey, about , (shaw). – . initials, th century, plantin museum, antwerp, (ysendyck). – . initials, th and th centuries, (raguenet). . modern initial, dir. götz, carlsruhe. plate . old german letters. . german text, , (hrachowina). . german text alphabet, composed from several documents. plate . modern text. . schwabach type. . gutenberg gothic. . fr. thiersch, (malerjournal). . ribbon ornament, as typographical tail-piece. plate . renascence letters. . roman renascence alphabet, , specimen-book of john of yciar, durango, biscaya. . renascence alphabet, lower-case roman letters, specimen-book of wolfgang fugger, nuremberg, , (hrachowina). . renascence initial, . . renascence initial, , (formenschatz). . initial, , lucas cranach the elder, (formenschatz). . renascence initial, “gedruckt zu augspurg durch jost de necker" (wessely). renascence initial, italian, (formenschatz). . initial, th century, elzevir printing office, (ysendyck) . initial, th century, specimen-book of paul fürst of nuremberg, (l'art pour tous). . initial, barocco period, french, (hrachowina). . modern initial, by p. koch. . modern initial, by dir. c. hammer. : : plate . roman initials. . renascence, , (hrachowina). . renascence, th century, plantin printing office, antwerp, (ysendyck). modern, french. – . modern, paris. ornamental letters. in a yºu old english letters, &c. plate . ornamental letters. roman initials. plate . ornamental letters. a b c d = f g |h| || j k l m. n. o p q r s t u v wy s x y z & aee ce an, je (c. iſ e. f. (cº- jht iſ ºſ jº jt , nat int (c) ih q r s "iº t' j wy sº jº ts’ vºº (ce. lºcidef- a/k/_//noa astc/ ( . zºº tº . ~~~ zzº-sº plate . roman letters. ornamental letters a b c d e f g |h| || j k l m. n. o p q r s t u v wy s_x y. z & ae ce a\, je (c, d) ih, th' (c. jht. iſ j jºš jt , nat int (c) ie q jf. s. "i u. j. v. | nº ºs ºr z º.º. cº. º cdºº, º b c d = f g |h| || j k . |no p or s iſ uv vy s_x y. z & ae ce a\, je (c. jd) he th' (c. jht. iſ j. j. & jt , nat int (c) tº q ſº sº i u. j. v. sº ºs º º gº lºcocº, a/k/_//noa astlº z. zºº tº . ~~~ ~ gºzzº o g tº fºx.’ cº . plate . r tters. oman le º roman letters. — constructions, numerals, and monograms. plate . . modern. . modern. roman letters. . renascence italic, gottlieb münch, ordnung der schrift, . . renascence lower-case italic, michael bauernfeind, nuremberg , (hrachowina). plate . . . – . , , and . . . . constructions, numerals, and monograms. roman capitals. german text, and large gothic uncial letters. arabic numerals, th and th centuries. modern monograms of two and three letters, (raguenet). modern monogram, dir. götz. monogram of a name: “laugier", (raguenet). monogram of christ; formed of the greek initials of the name of christ, found in the catacombs. it is frequently combined with the letters la , in allusion to rev. xxii. : “i am alpha and omega” (compare plate . ). of later date is the monogram ihs, the first three letters of the name jesus, ihxoys, when written with greek letters, which was afterwards selected by the jesuits as the badge of their order. it has been variously explained as meaning: “jesus hominum salvator" (jesus the saviour of men); “in hoc salus" (in him is salvation); “jesus habemus socium" (we have jesus for our companion); or: “in hoc signo vinces" (in this sign thou shalt conquer). the numerals refer to the pages in all cases. where they are enclosed in brackets: the page is a plate; and the small numerals refer to the figures in the plate. akanthos, leaf: , ( . ). akroter: . alabastron: . alphabet: see letters. altar: . amber-tree leaf: ( . , ). amphora: . ampulla: . animals: . antefix: . arm-chair: . armet: . armorial bearings: . artificial objects: . artificial foliage: . * leaf: . aryballos: ( . ). astragal, enrichment of: . atlante: . badge: see heraldry. balauster: . bands: . band-motive: . base, (column): . ,, , (candelabrum): . basin: . battle-axe: . beaker: . bedstead: . bell: . bench: . bisellium: . boar, head: ( . ), ( . ). book decoration: ( . , ). borders: see bands, . ,, , (typographical): see frames. boss: . bottle: . box: see cist, chest, &c. bracelet: . bracket: , ( . – ). breast-pin: . brooch: . bryony: . bucket: . buckle: . burganet: . button: . cabbage-stalk glass: . cabinet: . ,, , hanging: . calathus: see kalathos. candelabrum: . -- , (capital): . -- , (foot and base): . -- , (shaft): . candle bracket: . candlestick: , . canephora: see kanephoros. cantharus: see kantharos. capital, (candelabrum): . ,, , (column): . index. flower-pot: . , -vase: . fly-flapper: . folding-chair: . foliage, artificial: . ,, , natural: . font: . foot: ( . – ), fork: . fox, head: ( . ). frames: . ,, , (architectural): . , , (mirror): . ,, , (strap-work): . ,, , (typographical): . free or naments: . fret band: . frieze: ( ), ( . ), ( )—( ). fringe: . fruit, in festoon: . funnel: . furniture: . -- , leg. . gable-ornament: . gargoyle: . garland: see in ( . ). gate: see grill. geometrical elements: . german drinking-glasses: . girdle: , , ( . – ). gladiator's helmet: . glass, drinking: . ,, , see stained-glass. goblet: . gothic tracery: . griffin: , ( . ). grill: . grottesque animal: . -> figure: . -- mask: . gryps: . guilloche: see interlacement band. hair-pin: . half-figure: . halberd: . meyer, handbook of ornament. º hammer: . hanap: . hand-bell: . hand-mirror: . hanging-cabinet: . hat, (cardinal's, &c., heraldic): . head-dress (jewelry): . heads of animals: . heaume: , . helmet: , , ( ), ( ). ,, , trappings: . heraldry: . hermes: see terminus. hexagon, subdivision: . hinge: . hippotragelaphos: . holy-water stoup: . hop, leaf: . horn, drinking: . horse, head: ( . – ). human, body: . hydria: . hyacinth-glass: . implements: see trophy, symbol. initial: see letters. ink-stand: . inn-chair: ( . ). instruments: see trophy, symbol. interlacement band: . ivy, leaf: , ( . ). jar: . jewelry: . jug: see pitcher, pot. ralathos: ( . ). kalpis: ( . ). kanephoros: . kantharos: . kapros: . key: . kettle: ( . ). klismos: . knife: . knob, (finial): . knocker: . knot: see ribbon. index. kothon: . krater: . kyathos: . kylix: , ( . ). label: . lace: . lachrimatory: . ladle: . lamp: . - , , pendant: , ( . ). ,, , table: . lance: . lantern: . laurel: , ( . ). lazy-tongs: . leaf band: . ,, , (natural): . lectern: . lectus cubicularis: . leg, (furniture): . lekythos: . letters: . link border: . lion, (heraldic): . ,, , (natural): . ,, , head: , ( . , ). lizard: ( . ). lock-escutcheon: ( . ). lotus: , ( . ), ( . ( . ), ( . , ). lozenge, panel: , ( . , ), ( . ). ,, , subdivision: . lunette, panel: . lynx, head: ( . ). mace: . maeander: see fret. mantling, (heraldic): . maple, leaf: ( . . ). margin: see . mars' head: ( . ). martel-axe: . mask: . match-holder: . medallion: , ( . , , ). medusa, head: . – ), mermaid: ( . ). metal objects: . minerva, head: ( . , ). mirror-frame: . mirror, hand: . miserere-seat: . mitre: ( . – ). monogram: . monstrance: . morion: . mosaic: . motto: . mouldings, enrichments of: , . mug: . mural painting: . natural forms: . nautilus-shell: ( . ) necklace: . neck-ring: ( . , ). needle-case: . network: . numerals: . oak, leaf: ( . , ), ( . ), ( . ). objects, decorated: . oblong, panel: . ,, , subdivision: . octagon, subdivision: . oinochoë: . olive: . olpe: . order, (heraldic): . ordinary, (heraldic): . ornament applied to fea- tures: . oval, construction: . ovolo, enrichment of: . ox, head: ( . ). painting: see mural painting. palmette band: . palm, leaf: . panels: . panther, (heraldic); ( g). ,, , head: . paper-knife: . papyrus: . index. parapet: . parquetry: . partizan: . patera: . pendant, (architectural): . ,, , (jewelby): . pennon: . pentagon, subdivision: . pepper-mill: . perforation: . perfume-vase: . phiale: . picture-frame: . pike: . pilaster, (capital): . ,, , (panel): , ( . , ), ( . – ). pin: . pitcher (lip-spout): . plate: . ,, , border: . polygon: . post: . pot (pipe-spout): . printer's-mark: . printing: . prochotis: . proëdra: ( . ). puzzle-glass: . quadrelle: ( . ). railing: , see also parapet, bal- auster. rain-water spout: , ( . – ), ( . – ). raking panel: . ram, head: ( . – ), ( . – ). ranunculus, leaf: ( . ). rectangle: see oblong. repeating ornaments: . revolving stool: . rhombus, panel: see lozenge, panel. ,, , subdivision: . rhyton: . ribbon: . ring: . rope-pattern: see linterlacement band. rosette: , see also square, panel, circle, panel. rosette band: . rummer: . salade: , . salt-cellar: . scabbard: , . scale diaper: . scallop shell: ( . , ). scent-bottle: . scissors: . scriptionale: ( . ). scyphus: see skyphos. seal: . seat: . sector: . sella balnearis: . ,, curulis; . semicircle: see lunette. serpent, (heraldic): ( . ). ,, , (natural): . shaft, (candelabrum): . ,, , (column): , . ,, , (pilaster): . sheath: see scabbard. shell: . shield: , . ,, , (heraldic): . sideboard: . signet-ring: . simpulum: ( . . ). situla: ( . – ). skull, human: . , , ox: ( . ), ( . ). skyphos: smelling-bottle: see scent-bottle. snuffers: . ( . ). sofa : . spanrail panel: . spangle: . spoon: , . sphinx: , ( . ), ( . ). square, diaper: . ,, , panel: , ( . ). * , . . . . . . * wiq‘lu‘fiw .lln» £ , “ . > . ; j lulq . l ' \.i%. . v v ltlrlt}u§ni.ltt: y x . my.‘ l\ library of the university of illinois at urbana-champaicn f (x) k stacks . j ‘ . . . i. i . . .. , rmfi. . ' . . _ , - ¢ . . ’ i .l , !’ .o. i ' v... _ v a . j / r ‘ n . .- .v. , . i > » i ‘v . . . - .v ‘ ’}. lim . i » .< ilium, . - ,‘ . ). y." .mjj i v v v . , .. ~ . i . . . . /. iqn-i/iirlfl ... ... f ., w _ _. ... c..§$.... ...., j fl ., . v ... i . .. . . ‘ i . ‘ . v fruilfif, .l_ . , . . . ..... .i . . , . - .. . v? .. ' k,» , l'xwv \ .. ) . u ‘ n. . ‘ \ i! , {i univ. of iii. library ' :; international _ library of technology a series of textbooks for persons engaged in the engineering professions and trades or for those who desire information concerning them. fully illustrated and containing numerous practical examples and their solutions historic ornament elements of ornament practical design applied design scranton: international textbook company copyright, . . , by internatlonal textiioox company. entered at stationers' hall. london. historic ornament: copyright. . by the colliery engineer company. elements of ornament: copyright, . by the colliery engineer company. practical deslzn: copyright. . by the colliery engineer company- entered at stationers’ hall. london. applied design. part : copyright, . by the colliery engineer company. entered at stationers‘ hall, london. applied design, part : copyright, . by international textuoox company. entered at stationers' hall, london. all rights resen'ed. printed in the united states. ! 'qulil‘i . hm preface the international library of technology is the outgrowth of a large and increasing demand that has arisen for the reference libraries of the international correspondence schools on the part of those who are not students of the ' schools. as the volumes composing this library are all printed from the same plates used in printing the reference libraries above mentioned, a few words are necessary regarding the scope and purpose of the instruction imparted to the students of—and the class of students taught by— these schools, in order to afford a clear understanding of their salient and unique features. the only requirement for admission to any of the courses offered by the international correspondence schools, is that the applicant shall be able to read the english language and \,}to write it sufficiently well to make his written answers to the questions asked him intelligible. each course is com- \,\‘plete in itself, and no textbooks are required other than hose prepared by the schools for the particular course tselected. the students themselves are from every class, {trade, and profession and from every country; they are. _ almost without exception, busily engaged in some vocation, 'yand can spare but little time for study, and that usually :outside of their regular working hours. the information q desired is such as can be immediately applied in practice, so qthat the student may be enabled to exchange his present \yocation fora more congenial one, or to rise to a higher level tin the one he now pursues. furthermore, he wishes to tain a good working knowledge of the subjects treated in he shortest time and in the most direct manner possible. in iv preface in meeting these requirements, we have produced a set of books that in many respects, and particularly in the general plan followed, are absolutely unique. in the majority of subjects treated the knowledge of mathematics required is limited to the simplest principles of arithmetic and mensu- ration, and in no case is any greater knowledge of mathe- matics needed than the simplest elementary principles of algebra, geometry, and trigonometry, with a thorough, practical acquaintance with the use of the logarithmic table. to effect this result, derivations of rules and formulas are omitted, but thorough and complete instructions are given regarding how, when, and under what circumstances any. particular rule, formula, or process should be applied; and whenever possible one or more examples, such as would be likely to arise in actual practice—together with their solu- tions—are given to illustrate and explain its application. in preparing these textbooks, it has been our constant endeavor to view the matter from the student's standpoint, and to try and anticipate everything that would cause him trouble. the utmost pains have been taken to avoid and correct any and all ambiguous expressions—both those due to faulty rhetoric and those due to insufficiency of statement or explanation. as the best way to make a statement, explanation, or description clear, is to give a picture or a diagram in connection with it, illustrations have been used almost without limit. the illustrations have in all cases been adapted to the requirements of the text, and projec- tions and sections or outline, partially shaded, or full-shaded perspectives, have been used, according to which will best produce the desired results. half-tones have been used rather sparingly, except in those cases where the general eflfect is desired rather than the actual details. it is obvious that books prepared along the lines men- tioned must not only be clear and concise beyond anything heretofore attempted, but they must also possess unequaled value for reference purposes. they not only give the maximum of information in a minimum space, but this infor- mation is so ingeniously arranged andcorrelated, and the preface v indexes are so full and complete, that it can at once be made available to the reader. the numerous examples and explanatory remarks, together with the absence of long demonstrations and abstruse mathematical calculations, are of great assistance in helping one to select the proper for- mula, method, or process and in teaching him how and when it should be used. four of the volumes composing this library are devoted to the subject of architectural and decorative design. this volume is devoted entirely to the principles of general design without regard to any specific application of those principles. considerable space is devoted to the study of historic ornament, as a training in what has been done in past ages in the way of creating new ideas and adapting older ideas to more modern purposes. the elements of ornament treats of the fundamental elements on which his- toric ornamental forms are based. practical design treats of the reduction of natural and elementary forms to a prac- tical basis wherein they can be applied as ornament to various objects, and applied design treats of the necessary alteration in form, proportion, and character that various elements of ornament must undergo in order to conform to the requirements of the material and purpose to which they are applied. the method of numbering the pages, cuts, articles, etc. is such that each subject or part, when the subject is divided into two or more parts, is complete in itself; hence, in order to make the index intelligible, it was necessary to give each subject or part a number. this number is placed at the top of each page, on the headline, opposite the page number; and to distinguish it from the page number it is preceded by the printer’s section mark (§). consequently, a reference such as § , page , will be readily found by looking along the inside edges of the headlines until § is found, and then through § until page is found. international tnxrnoox company. contents historic ornament sedion page introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ancient ornament . . . . . . . . . . . primitive ornament . . . . . . . . . . egyptian ornament . . . . . . . . assyrian ornament . . . . . . . . . . classic ornament . . . . . . . . . . . greek ornament . . . . etruscan ornament greco-roman ornament roman ornament . . . . . . . the five orders of architecture . the greek orders . . the roman orders romanesque ornament . . ' byzantine ornament . . . . . . . asiatic ornament . . . . . . . . . . chinese and japanese ornament indian ornament . . arabian ornament . . . . . . . . turkish ornament . . . . . . . . . persian ornament . . . . . . . . . moorish ornament . . . . . western art celtic ornament . . gothic ornament . . . . . . . . . . renaissance art . . . . . . italian renaissance . . . . . . . french renaissance . . . german and english renaissance . . iii iv contents historic ornament—~cont 'nued section page conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . historic lettering . . . . . . . . . . . antique egyptian alphabet . . . . . . . light antique egyptian alphabet . . . . heavy antique egyptian alphabet . . . medieval roman alphabet . . . . . . i. light and heavy french roman alphabet gothic alphabet . . . . . . . . . . . . old english alphabet . . . . . . . . . elements of ornament composition . . . . . . . . . . . . surface decoration . . . . . . . . . conventionalism . . . . . . . ornament . . . . . . . . . . . . natural ornament . . . . . . . . . conventional ornament . . . . classification of elements . . . . . . geometrical elements . . . . . . . . . ‘ architectural elements . . . . . . . . . industrial elements . . . . . . o . natural elements . . . . . . . . . animal elements . . . . . . . . . . . human figure . . . . . . . . . . . . practical design principles involved . . . . . . . . . . planning the design . . . . . . . . . . drop pattern . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ turn-over method . . . . . . . . . . . variety of methods . . . . . . . . . . borders, corners, and stripes . . . . . . applied design geometrical considerations . . . . . . . arrangement of details . . . . . . . . application of ornament . . . . . . . . hanging fabrics. . . . . . . . . . . . contents v applied design- continued sedz'on page wall decoration . . . . . . . . . . . . ceiling decoration . . . . . . . floor decoration . . . . . . . . . . . utensils and vases . . . . . . . . . . textile fabrics . . . . . . i. . . . . . character of the threads . . . . . . . . yarns . . . . . . . . . . . . . cotton, flax; and silk . . . . . . . . . warp and weft . . . . . . . . . . . . double cloths . . . . . . . .' . . . . . jacquard machine ._ . . . . . . . . . . carpets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . historic ornament. ‘ (part .) introduction. . meaning of “ornament.”—the term ornament in its more limited sense is applied to such elements of decora- tion as are adapted or derived from natural forms. these differ from what we consider the geometrical elements, inas- much as they are organic, and suggestive of life and growth. i they depend for their expression on the general arrange- ment of their branches, leaves, and blossoms, while the - geometrical elements owe their expression entirely to their geometrical form and arrangement relative to one another. when simply drawn on paper and in no way applied to any object, or used for any purpose other than the expression of itself, one of these elements of decoration may be considered simply as an ornament. it does not become an element of decoration until it is applied to something, and in the abstract, the term ornammf should not be confused with the term a'rroralz'on, which is distinctly applied ornament. . meaning of “ decoration.”—the term decoration signifies the application, or the result of the application, of ornament to objects or surfaces. it does not mean the simple “ sticking on” of an ornament to a surface, but con- veys the idea of the adaptation of an ornamental form to suit the requirements of its position and the purpose of the object to which it is applied. § for notice of the copyright, see page immediately following the title page. historic ornament. § the elements of decoration consist of geometrical lines, natural foliage, artificial objects, animals, and the human figure. all these may be considered as ingredients or com- ponents that may be mixed and applied in various propor- tions according to certain standard and acknowledged rules termed principle the rule by which any one mixture is accomplished determines the style or class of the design. . principles of decoration.—the principles of decoration, considered separately and distinctly from the elements thatare used to make up the design, are dependent on, and in harmony with, the rules of architectural propor- tion. this may be illustrated by considering the subdivision of a wall surface into three horizontal bands—the dada, the wall, and the frz'czv—in the proportion of the pedestal, column, and entablature of an architectural order. true, there are styles of design where these proportions are at variance with any architectural order; but, with few excep- tions, these will be found to exist in styles or periods of historic art wherein the orders of classic architecture were unknown or misunderstood, as will be considered hereafter. this general division of a wall surface, however, may exist by the simple placing of horizontal lines to mark the heights, this subdivision being purely geometrical. the decoration may be extended by applying to the subdivisions such natural foliage as leaves and running vines; artificial objects, such as the hieroglyphics of the egyptians; or animals, and the human figure, as seen in the gothic and renaissance work; or a combination of these forms. in each case, however, the main subdivisions are in accordance with general rules; and the surface covering, though gov- erned by less restrictive rules, is, at the same time, sub- servient to a definite proportion of ornamented to plain surface, different under different circumstances. . elements of decoration—whatever the theme of decoration—whether it be the expression of the invention of a new idea, or only the arbitrary adoption of some familiar § historic ornament. form—two elementary conditions will always be found to exist: first, a decoration produced by an arrangement and joining of dots and lines, or by a combination of geometrical figures in accordance with the laws of rhythm, regulation, and symmetry; and sz‘olld, a decorative effect arising from the attempt to represent objects from the external world. the elements nearest at hand for imitation are found in organic nature with its plants, animals, and the human form; but inorganic nature also furnishes models, as in the forms of crystallization, such as snowflakes, and various phenom- ena, as clouds, lightning, waves, etc.; besides which there are rich resources open in'artificial objects fashioned by man himself, as vases and utensils of daily use. . combination of elements.——it may now be more readily understood how all kinds of elements may be com- bined. geometrical may be united with natural forms, and details and ideas suggested by natural forms may be com- bined with creatures of the human imagination to form eccentricities that do not really exist in nature, but that man has always delighted in adopting as representative of some higher or supernatural power. illustrative of these, we have the sphinx, so identified with egyptian art; the centaur and the mermaid in classic art; and the animal bodies with human heads, and the combination of beasts or fishes with the wings of birds, or with plant life and foliated terminations, prevalent in many details of gothic and renaissance art. . symbolic devices.—in heraldry and armorial bear- ings, with which the decorations of the middle ages and following centuries are replete, there are a number of devices with definite names that depend entirely on the combination of different characteristics, borrowed from different classes of animals, in order to combine in one figure the attributes of several natural beasts. for instance, we have the dragon, with the body of a serpent and the head of a carnivorous bird, and the wings of a bat, combining in the one animal the stealth and treachery of the snake, the cruelty and historic ornament. § passion of the vulture, and the uncanny and silent secrecy associated with the nocturnal habits of the bat. on the other hand, we have a variation of the form or characteristics of an individual animal, in order to emphasize those characteristics for the purpose represented. in many of the armorial devices of great britain is found a represen- tation of a lion—never in the true form of the lion, as we are in the habit of thinking of him in the jungle, but a lion with along attenuated body, generally with one or both fore paws raised from the ground, and always with his mouth open and protruding tongue and teeth. the lion is indica- tive of power and strength, and, consequently, of sover- eignty. the attenuation of his body increases the feeling of litheness associated with animals of the cat tribe, while the expression given his face and forefeet is indicative of firmness, and power for aggressiveness, offensiveness, or defensiveness, as the case may require. . influence of architecture.—-decoration is applied art, and the forms used in decoration become varied accord- ing to the purpose for which they are used. decoration, as applied to architecture, consists of the ornamentation of the structural features of a building—of the variation in color, or proportion of diiferent surfaces that are adjacent, and of the introduction of familiar symbols, or objects, to convey a definite historical or religious idea. to a certain extent, all decoration partakes of the same characteristics as architectural decoration. wall decoration is architectural, and consists of the variation in color or proportion of adjacent surfaces, or of the same surfaces divided. the decoration of silks and tapestries, either in the weaving or printing, is a variation of surface that must be further considered in its architectural relation, when they are hung on the walls, over the doors, or around the windows, and seen, not as plain surfaces, but in folds. the treatment of furniture is an architectural decoration, both in the orna- mentation of its structural features and in the application of symbols to portions of its surface. in fact, in all periods of § historic ornament. art, it will be found that any attempt at ornamentation is governed directly or indirectly by the prevailing tastes in architecture and the sister arts. . conditions influencing architecture.—though ornament and architecture have been steadily progressive from the days of earliest egypt to the close of the nine- teenth century, there is little resemblance between the characteristic ornament or architecture of any two periods, except where there has been a deliberate revival of a certain style of art. where the artists of a nation or locality have been left to their own devices and originality, they have produced a style of ornament suitable to their purpose, their period, and their relations, that is in no way connected or suited to other surrounding conditions. although the influences that have affected the style and character of the ornament of different periods are many, the religious and geographical influences are probably the strongest. political influences determine, to 'a certain extent, the character, according to the government and relations of the people, and also the profusion and elaboration, and, to a certain extent, the quality of execution, of ornament; for the richer a nation becomes, the more she expends on her monuments of public utility and beauty, and the more elaborate her citizens become in the taste and decoration of their house- holds. in fact, we find no art progress in any country until it begins to show signs of amassing wealth. . influence of religion.—the effect of religion in ornament can be traced through all periods, and those. nations with whom religious belief was more closely inter- mingled with the civic and domestic duties of the day, expressed in every detail of their ornament some tribute to a superior being. during the laxity of morals and general religious fervor toward the close of the renaissance period, we find few religious forms woven in the fabric of any class of ornament, except the pagan forms that were borrowed in ignorance from an antique religion and an ancient art. historic ornament. § this free use of symbolic forms, both ancient and modern, gives us an unlimited field for combinations in ornamental design, which, though practiced through fifty centuries, has not exhausted the possibilities for originality. . decorative art.-—a decoration and decorative art, whether carved, painted, or modeled, is the expression of the wants, facilities, and sentiments of the age in which it is created. all products of decorative art should possess fitness, proportion, and harmony of both form and color, in order that the result may express what we term repose; and beauty results from that repose that the mind feels when the eye, the intellect, and the afiections are satisfied, and free from any sense of want. as in architecture, construc- tion' may be decorated, but uuder no circumstances can decoration be constructed. decoration must always form a part of the purpose or object with which it is associated. it is useless to try to deceive the eye and intellect by carving a natural vine on a stone tablet. n o right-minded person will ever take the imitation for the real vine, and the highest tribute that can be paid to it is that the carver was skilled with his chisel and hammer,'and the designer had failed to undeistand and appreciate his material. if the vine is to be a stone vine, let it be reduced to a form that is suitable in stone; if it is to be a woven vine in a fabric, let its form he reduced to the limitations of results obtainable from the loom; if it is a vine to be painted on a wall surface, let it be a painted representation of the char- acteristics of a certain vegetable growth, and not a picture or portrait of an object that if real would be highly out of place where represented. . conventionallsm.—this proper representation of a familiar form according to the position it is to occupy, or the material in which it is to be executed, is called conven- tionalism, and is the first detail of applied art that the designer must learn to comprehend. an old axiom states, “that which is beautiful must be true," and we may add § historic ornament. to it conversely, “that which is true must be beautiful,” and on this axiom depends all the beauty of ornament in architecture, decoration, and the allied arts. ornamental design is not portrait painting—it is not the faithful portrayal of the details of nature for purely pictorial purposes. the skill of the artist in this branch of art is applied to making something of simple utility an object of beauty; whereas, the portraitist is engaged in rendering on . canvas, or other surface, an absolute portrait of the subject before him. . consistency in designing—the decorative de- signer must have in mind the construction or fabrication of a useful article, with the value and utility of which he com- bines his art. the figure portraitist, landscape portraitist, or floral portraitist, if we may so distinguish _them, has before him a subject thathe intends to translate in paint to a surface that shall have nothing associated with it in the mind but the figure, the country, or the flowers it repre- sents. if the decorative designer takes the same subject, he does not represent it with the same fidelity, because it is applied to a utensil, and the object of the utensil must not be lost sight of; and if he decorates the surface of a utensil or dress material with a design that claims to be an absolute portrayal of the flower or other device itself, he states in his decoration that this is nothing but the representation of a flower and he draws the mind away from the fact that it really is a utensil; this is not true, and, according to the foregoing axiom, the result cannot be beautiful. . if, in the weaving of a carpet, or other floor cover- ing, the designer attempts to portray natural bunches of roses and rose leaves, he is suggesting to the observer that this is a picture or portrait of a bunch of roses, executed entirely to please the senses as a portrayal of the flowers .themselves, which is not true; for, if it were, we should hang it near the level of the eye, separating it from any sense of utility, other than the conveying of a feeling of historic ornament. § satisfaction and delight to the affections and to the intellect; whereas, as a matter of fact, it is a floor covering decorated _ with an out-of-place design. . general rules.—in the decoration of a surface, the general form is first cared for and subdivided or orna- mented by general lines; the interstices may then be filled withornament and may themselves again be divided and fully enriched for closer observation. but all ornament, no matter how minutely carried out, should be based on a geometrical, system of construction, as a true proportion will be found to exist between all members so based. in all surface decoration, a rule to be observed is that all lines should be traced back to their branchings from a general parent stem, so that each detail of the ornament, no matter how distant, can be traced back through its branch to the root. this makes the design rational, but the connection with the parent stem and root must not be so marked as to dominate the spirit of the design. another rule requires that all junctions of curved lines with other curved lines, or of curved lines with straight lines, should be so made that they are tangent to each other at the point of junction, if they are intended to express parts of the same design. and a third rule says that flowers and other natural objects should not be used as ornaments in their natural forms, but should be conventionalized or reduced to geometrical princi- ples that convey the idea of their representation without purporting to be a likeness of the original, for the reasons heretofore set forth. - . color may be used to assist in the development of a form or idea, or to distinguish objects or parts of objects, ‘ one from another; or color may be used to assist light and shade, helping undulations of light and form by the proper distribution of several different tints. color should never be used, however, where the exigencies of the case do not positively require it. every design should depend for its intrinsic beauty on its form and its proportion, and these § _ historic ornament. may be enhanced by combinations and relations of color; but the design is a poor one that depends entirely on color for its attractiveness and beauty. with this understanding of the facts, let us now consider what has been done by our predecessors in the field of orna- mental design. ancient ornaivient. i primitive ornament. . under primitive ornament, we will consider those efforts at ornamental design observable in the works of the savage tribes. these peoples had no written history of art from which to draw ideas, no theory or rules of proportion to govern their conceptions, and, consequently, the expression of art as exhibited in their decorated utensils can be con- sidered pure and untrammeled. . influence of nature.—fr m the testimony of trav- elers in but partially explored countries, it would appear that there is no place on the face of the earth where some attempt is not made at ornamentation, no matter how crude a state of civilization the people may be in. the desire for ornament is present in every race, and it develops and ' increases in importance directly in proportion to their prog- ress in civilization. man appears everywhere impressed with the beauties of nature that surround him, with the mysteries governing the growths and phenomena that he cannot understand; and he seeks to imitate, within the limitations of his power, some of the works of his creator. the earliest instinct of man is to create something; no- matter how powerful he may be as a warrior, how dis- tinguished he may be as a tribal leader, or how wealthy he may be in the possession of earthly goods, he recognizes his inability to explain the phenomena of nature, and naturally attributes it to a being higher than himself. it is at all times historic ornament. § apparent that this being, whom he in his primitive way may worship as a god, creates, by some undefined power, devel- opments and appearances that inspire him with mystery and . awe. consequently, he endeavors, in his own simple way, to call into existence creations of his own that shall impress those fellow men whom he considers his inferiors as much as he is impressed by the works of his mysterious supreme being. . origin of tattooing.—in some savage tribes, this desire is expressed in the attempt to increase the facial expression by which he expects to strike terror to his enemies, rivals, or inferiors, or to create what appears to him a new and mysterious beauty. this he accomplishes by tattooing, or sometimes merely with paint. it is a remarkable fact that hideous as this practice renders his visage, it is, in most cases, exercised with the greatest care that the lines shall be so placed as to increase the facial expression and dew/ p, to the greatest extent, the eccentricities of his natural features. trivial as this detail may at first appear, it lies at the bottom of the fundamental principles of decorative design. the savage warrior does not obliterate his own expression and cover his face with paint and tattoo marks to create a new one, but simply arranges the lines to emphasize the details -of severity that he already possesses and with which he expects to inspire an impression of terror. . origin of set styles—it can be clearly shown throughout all history that in certain periods, an individual mind, stronger than those with which it is surrounded, will impress itself on a generation and carry with it a host of other minds of inferior power. these inferior minds imitate what they know to be better than what they can create, but do not imitate so closely as to destroy their own individual ambition to originate. it is to this tendency that we owe the birth and the modifications of styles. the efforts of the people in the earliest stages of civiliza- tion are like those of children, though lacking in power of (‘iij historic ornament. expression, they possess a grace and originality rarely found in middle age, and never in manhood's decline. the same may be found in the infancy of any art, which we will endeavor to point out as we go along. when art struggles for an existence, it succeeds by creating for itself new forms and new ideas, but, when reveling in its own successes, it fails. . effect of traditional styles.—the pleasure we receive in contemplating the crude attempts at ornament of the most primitive tribes arises from our appreciation of a difficult accomplishment. (we are interested in the evidence of the intention, and are surprised at the simple and child-like rudeness by which the result is accomplished. in fact, what we seek in their work of art is the evidence of mind—the evidence of that desire to create to which we have already referred. this evidence of mind, strange to say, is much more readily found in the rude attempts at savage ornament than in the innumerable productions of a highly advanced civilization. when art is manufactured by a combined effort, instead of being originated by the efforts of an individual, the true instincts, which constitute its greatest charm, are lost. by this we mean that the art of the present day is the result of the combined efforts of artists and artisans through centuries of development, whereas the art of the savage tribes is the expression of the mind of an individual warrior, untram- meled by tradition. . expression of taste in savage rnnment.—in fig. is shown a reproduction of a cloth pattern, the original of which came from the savage tribes of the samoan islands. it is made from thin sheets of bark stripped from a peculiar species of tree, and is beaten out and united so as to form one long parallelogram of cloth. certainly nothing could be more primitive as a method of manufacture, yet the pat- tern shows the existence of taste and skill, and an ingenuity of design rarely found in many of our woven fabrics of the historic ornament. § present day. the pattern is executed by means of small wooden stamps, and the work, though rude and irregular in its execution, conveys the intention at every point. there is a skilful balancing of the masses and a judicious avoidance of {a _ i lines that would tend to cause the eye to run in one direction. this is done by opposing each set of lines with others of opposite tendency; there are many styles and patterns of this work, all of which show posi- tive genius in their arrange- ment and development. . decorative theory exhibited by the savage.— the next development in this ‘ _. primitive art is found in the ‘\ : \ attempts at wood carving, and ,_ r the most likely place to look for it would be on the weapons used for the defense of the tribe, or in the chase of animals for food. the bravest or the most skilful of the warriors or hunters would desire to distinguish him- self somewhat above the others by the possession of a weapon, not only more useful, but, in his eyes, more complicated, and more beautiful. the best shape for the weapon he has already determined by experi- ence, and the enriching of its surface by carving naturally follows. the eye of the warrior being accustomed to the geometrical forms and details of the stamped cloths, his hand attempts to imitate them in the handles of his wooden utensils by means of knife cuts, and the paddle shown in fig. illustrates how faithfully this representation has been carried out. \ \_ \ \&\ ‘ ‘ it"? i i‘ l§-§~ . e- i i q"; i i if, / it w ‘ ' y i lil/ ‘ *. g historic ornament. this instrument is from new zealand, and the taste exhibited in its carving would bear favorable comparison with the art a ' works of the highest state of civiliza- tion. there is not a line on its sur- face misapplied; the general shape is most graceful and elegant, and the decoration is applied everywhere to best develop the form. the new zealander's instinct taught him that his paddle should be strong, not only in reality, but in appearance, and his ornament is so disposed as to give an appearance of strength greater than it would have had if the surface had remained undecorated. the band in the center of the length of the blade is continued around both sides, binding the border that extends around the edge, and this latter appears to hold in place all the other bands. had these bands run out like the center one, they would appear to have a tend- ency to slip ofif, as the center one is the only one that can occupy its posi- tion around the end of the paddle with repose. . value of the study of his- torlc ornament-.——these few facts have been pointed out in the prece- ding pages, so that the student may fully appreciate that beauty of orna- ment does not depend on the fidelity with which ancient ornament can be copied. the natural tendency of the mind will produce good results in the application of ornament in nearly all cases, if it is allowed to work historic ornament. § logically and without influence from stereotyped or his torical forms. the study of historic ornament is practiced to familiarize the student with what has been done heretofore, to point out to him such parts of the ancient works as have been done well, and to show him why they are considered to be done well, and also to render him familiar with other works of celebrated art periods which, though they may be beauti- ful in themselves, are not, as a matter of fact, as high a grade of art as our new zealander’s paddle, because of the lack of expression of mind in the designs, and the tendency to imitate the works of what was believed to be a superior mind, rather than to develop a new style along new lines. . how to study rnament.—from what has already been said, it will be easily understood that the ornament of a people carries in itself the characteristics of that people. it must be interpreted, however, by the aid of the history of the people as expressed in their monuments. the sub- ject of historic ornament should therefore be studied, not only with regard to its grace and beauty, but as a key to a portrayal of the qualities, characteristics, and disposition of the people to whom it belonged. in the consideration of the ornament of a country, we must first investigate all the details that are likely in any way to affect the art, in order that we may better under- stand why certain characteristics exist in the ornament of one people and are entirely absent in that of another. egyptian ornament. . influence of the nile on egyptian ornament. it seldom or never rains in egypt, except in the delta at the mouth of the river nile, and nature has provided for the fertilizing of the land by an annual overflow of the river that brings down mud and alluvial soil from the mountain regions, and deposits it on top of the old soil, thus enrich- ing it. for three months the water slowly rises in the nile § historic ornament. valley, and, for three months following, the river slowly subsides and then remains a narrow stream for the rest of the year, bordered by green fields of cotton and grass. the phenomenon of this yearly inundation of the nile, fig. , slow, majestic, and munificent, naturally impressed the early egyptian with a feeling of mystery and awe. in fact, in this inundation lies the key to the wealth of ancient egypt. _ "- r“ fig. . dwelling during the dry season on what would appear to be a barren plain, the egyptian saw the provision of a supreme being working for his good when the waters of the nile gradually overflowed, fertilized the soil, and then slowly subsided, leaving him to plant his seed. it is not strange, therefore, that the nile and everything associated with it should be sacred. in all egyptian ornament, we find some symbol or detail that reminds us of this great beneficence of providence and favor to the egyptian. the egyptian was an appreciative mortal, and in his art and architecture every- where placcd some reminder of the fact that he could do nothing and would be nothing without the care and watch- fulness of this supreme power. . antiquity of egyptian ornament. in study- ing egyptian ornament. however, we cannot begin at the historic ornament. § beginning, as we can with other styles, inasmuch as we have no historical records of any beginning. a peculiarity of the egyptian over all other styles is that the more ancient the ornament, the nearer perfection is the art. architectural monuments, erected , years before the christian era, are built of stones taken from the ruins of much more ancient buildings that were really more perfect. we are therefore compelled to study egyptian art during a period of its decline, but can accept the style as absolutely original, inas- much as we have no record of the existence of an earlier nation from whom they could have borrowed it. in egyptian art, there are no traces of infancy, nor of for- eign influence, and it is safe to infer that the egyptian artist drew his inspiration directly from nature. the types of his ornament are few but perfectly natural, and in theearliest period of egyptian art, the representation is but slightly removed from the type; but the later we descend in history, the more we find the original types receded from, until it is difficult, in many cases, to discover from what original idea the ornament, by successive mental efforts, has been developed. . influence of religion—although the egyptians decorated every article of utility that was in any way asso- ciated with their civil, domestic, or religious duties, we depend for examples of their ornament almost entirely on the designs and writings executed in connection with their complicated form of religion. ' the temples, tombs, and other sacred monuments of the most ancient inhabitants afford us the most rational and pro- gressive examples of ornament, and it is from these that we derive nearly all the information that we have of the man- ners and customs of the early egyptians. in the temples are preserved certain stone tablets and other devices, on which are records of certain ceremonies in connection with their religion, and these records are always executed in their peculiar form of hieroglyphs. the word izz'eroglyp/z, being literally translated, means sacred writing, but in its specific § historic ornament. sense is used to indicate the peculiar pictured descriptions of the egyptian religious ceremonies that are found carved and painted on the walls of their tombs and temples. . the egyptian temple consisted of a small sanctu; ary, or sc/cos, as it was called, that was reached through a large columnar hall known as the a]! of assembly, or some- times the lzyposty/e : ], the latter term meaning covered over on columns. in front of the hypostyle hall was a large open court, surrounded by high and massive walls and entered between two tower-like front walls, called pylons. each of these parts was varied slightly in different structures, some having two .courts in front of the hypostyle hall, known as the outer and inner court, and in many of the temples the sekos was surrounded by a number of smaller apartments. on the outside of the temple, the entrance was approached through a long avenue—often a mile or more in extent— lined on each side with colossal sphinxes, and occasionally historic ornament. § ending in a large monumental gateway advanced before the main entrance to the temple, as shown in fig. . this gateway was called a propylon, and it stood alone before the main entrance like a silent sentinel. the example shown in fig. is from the temple of rameses iii, at karnak, and from this a fair idea of the magnitude of these great archi- tectural details may be obtained. the faces of the propylon were always decorated with elaborate hieroglyphic devices as shown, and over the top was carved the winged glow, of which we shall have occasion to speak hereafter. beyond the propylon stand the two great pylons that form the outer front wall of the building, and the entrance between these two masses is similar in detail to the gateway advanced in front. a better idea of this arrangement can be obtained from fig. , which shows a portion of the avenue, the entrance, and pylons of the temple of edfou, in upper egypt. in fig. . this case, the propylon is omitted, and at the end of the long avenue of sphinxes stand two great obelisks—one on each side of the entrance. the walls of the pylons them- selves are decorated in hieroglyphs, the design at the bottom § historic ornament. representing a group of prisoners, taken from palestine, about to be executed by the king. . interior of the temple.—on the inside of the temple, these pylons are sculptured in much the same man- ner, though the lower part of them is largely covered by the roofed passageway around the edges of the court. fig. is a reproduction of a photograph taken in the inner court of a temple on the island of philae, and shows the appearance of these pylons on the inside, and a portion of the columns supporting the roof on the right side of the court. the pylons were massive structures, and contained, in their in- terior, a number of secret rooms accessible only to the priest and members of the royal family. an entrance to the interior of one of the pylons is seen on the left of fig. , and it will be observed that the general treatment around the door and over it is precisely the same, but on a smaller scale, as the main entrance to the temple historic ornament. a and the general character of the propylon illustrated in fig. . a better idea of the massiveness of these pylons may be obtained from fig. , a photograph of the temple of edfou, showing the taper of the walls from the ground upwards, a characteristic of all egyptian architecture. this illustra- tion is taken from above the side walls of the temple, so fig. . that the entrance columns of the hypostyle hall at the rear of the court may be seen, and by comparing fig. with fig. , both being illustrations of the same tem- ple, a fair idea of the state of preservation of this great edifice may be obtained, fig. representing it in its original form and fig. being a photograph of it at the present day. ' at the top, the walls of the pylons flared out, forming a simple concave cornice, above which gleaming cressets at night and fiaunting banners by day were carried on long iron stocks or staffs, which, combined with the highly colored decorations on the walls, gave the building an effect § historic ornament. of mysterious grandeur, perfectly consistent with the com- plex system of the ancient egyptian belief. the iron stocks carrying the banners, etc. were inserted in the recesses shown on each side of the entrance. flo. b. . obelisks.—the obelisks in front of the temple are in themselves characteristic of egyptian art. each of these consisted of a tall stone shaft, quarried in a single piece, historic ornament. § and sculptured on four sides with elaborate hieroglyphic ornament. a photographic reproduction of one of these interesting details is shown in fig. . this was one of a pair of obelisks known as “cleopatra's needles," and is shown as it stood in the city of alexandria, egypt, for nearly , years. it is feet in height, and feet inches square at the base. it originally stood with its companion before the entrance of the temple at heliopolis in lower egypt, but was removed to the city of alexandria after the defeat of anthony and cleopatra by the roman emperor augustus, just before the beginning of the chris- tian era. in the year it was removed from alexandria and transported to new york city, where it now stands on a mound on the east side of central park. . the temples differ widely in size and elaboration of plan, but the general scheme of arrangement is the same in all cases, whether the example is taken from northern egypt or southern nubia. between the years and b. c., the greatest temples were built. the pharaohs fig. . wanted eternal dwelling places for their deities, and built their temples entirely of stone, laid up in blocks ' massive and so well fitted that they have withstood the ravages of time down to the present day. in fig. is shown the plan of the ramesseum, a temple built by, and named after, rameses, one of the kings of egypt, who reigned about b. c. here the sanctuary § historic ornament. is shown at a, surrounded by a number of smaller apart- ments a, which were used by the priests and members of the royal family, both as places for their mysterious devo» tions and as royal residences; the king and his immedi- ate relatives being considered earthly representatives of the gods. the sanctuary contained the shrine, and was entered through either of two portals, one from the hypo- style hall b and the other communicating with one of the sacred apartments ’. at b is shown the hypostyle hall, the roof of which was supported by two sets of columns, the central ones being . l ? “ . ‘ l in“: ' ll ~ - i" flo. . longer than those on each side, in order to provide a clear- story for the admission of light and air. this is more clearly shown in fig. , which is an illus- tration photographed from a restored model of the great hypostyle hall in the temple at karnak. at a is seen the double row of long columns, which are connected longitu- dinally by the stone lintels b, in order to receive the edges of historic ornament. § the stone slabs c, which form the roof over the nave, or cen- tral portion of the temple. on each side of these are the shorter columns !, which are connected transversely by the lintels c, and the inside row longitudinally by the lintel f, to support the roof slabs g in the same manner as over the nave. an open space i: is thus left to admit light to the interior of the hall, and form a clearstory similar to the same detail in our more modern cathedrals, of which we shall learn later on. the spacing of the supports being governed entirely by the length of lintel the builders were able to quarry, the columns are exceedingly close together. for this reason, large apartments were never entirely roofed over in the egyptian temples, but were open to the sky, either wholly or in part, as shown in fig. at c, which is the inner court of the temple, from which the hypostyle hall must be entered. on each side of this inner court is adouble row of columns supporting a roof extending from the side walls, while at the back is a single row of columns , and a row of square piers d, which carry a portion of the roof that extends over from the hypostyle hall. another row of square piers e car- ries the roof over the front end of this inner court, which, with the other partial coverings, surrounds the court with a narrow projecting roof on all four sides. . the effect of this treatment must have been very imposing in itself, but, to add to the imp'ression, colossal statues were carved on the inside faces of the square piers, and flights of stone steps led up to a gallery at the level of the hypostyle hall, the floor of which was considerably above the level of the inner court. the outer, or entrance, court d was a comparatively plain enclosure, with columns on each side and a single flight of steps up to the floor of the inner court above. it was entered through a narrow portal f, flanked on each side by the massive pylons e, and served merely as an entrance court- preparatory to the grandeur and solemnity of the more sacred apartments beyond. § historic ornament. ’ . the earl}r egyptian statues were usually colossal in size, and there was no attempt at economy or saving of time in any structure that was erected for the purpose of religious ceremony or the burial of their dead. the pyramids (see figs. and ) were erected as tombs for the kings, and give a very fair idea of the patience and persistence of this ancient people, that would work , men for years on a tomb for the body of their king, at a cost of over $ , ,- . it is a mystery to this day how the stones were quar- ried and transported with the primitive tools and machinery in use , years before the christian era, for this great pyramid of cheops, feet square at the base, and feet in height, is the largest structure in the world today. . the great sphinx.—next to the pyramids in massive grandeur comes the great sphinx at gizeh. this is a statue of the egyptian god harmachis, carved out of solid rock, making a figure feet long, feet high, and feet across the shoulders. the body, which has the form of a crouching lion, is now entirely buried in drifted sand, but the human head, measuring feet from chin to top, and the broad, massive shoulders, are still visible above the ‘ historic ornament. § sand drifts, as shown in fig. . between the forefeet of the body is excavated a temple where the god was wor- shiped, and, if built at the same time as the sphinx, this temple is the oldest architectural monument on record, as it antedates the pyramids over , years. . types of people—there were two types of people among the egyptians, varying decidedly in physique and intellectual appearance. one type of aristocratic origin possessed a refined face, with a moderately high forehead, aquiline. nose, rather full lips, and rounded chin; the other type was from plebeian stock, with low forehead, short nose, heavy jaws, and very thick lips.. the former was serious and thoughtful, grave, dignified, and religious; the latter gay, pleasure loving, light hearted, and good natured. these two types are represented in many of their hieroglyphs and wall paintings, and are often used as symbols of the very attributes we ascribe to them. the lower type have been used to express some degraded or inferior people, and the more refined type have been used to represent royal person- ages and the gods. the kings and royal families in egypt being considered earthly representatives of the gods, had privileges in the complicated system of egyptian religious rites that the priests themselves did not enjoy. an offering to a king was equivalent, under certain circumstances, to an offering to one of the gods. the egyptians worshiped many gods, but the chief ones were osiris, isis, horus, and thoth. they also paid religious regards to animals. cats, dogs, cows, hawks, beetles, and monkeys were sacred throughout all egypt, as will be seen hereafter. . the lotus and papyrus—the most conspicuous type in egyptian art is the lotus (fig. ), a plant growing on the banks of the nile, somewhat resembling our pond lily, but differing from it in coloring. the lotus leaves float on the surface of the water at the end of a long stem, in the same manner as do the pond-lily leaves, but the blossom § historic ornament. stands on a stiff stalk high out of the water, and is of a bril- liant purple color on the border petals, with a heart of deep orange. the lotus was a sacred flower, and as an offering to the gods was conspicuous in the highest forms of worship. it is easy to understand the importance of the lotus in egyptian religious theories. the deified lotus stands repre- sentative of the homage rendered to the beneficent action of water and sun on the sleeping earth. it is the symbol of the annual evolution of the seasons, causing generation to sue- ceed generation, and the return of life, where everything had seemed barren in the immobility of death. the papyrus plant was also used largely in egyptian art and associated with the nile on whose banks it grew, but not to such an extent as the lotus. from the papyrus plant a fig. . kind of paper was manufactured on which the egyptians wrote many of their sacred legends, and it is from the name of this plant that the modern word “paper” is derived. . the winged disk—the sun itself was also the object of direct worship, the ceremony of which was varied by the priests in order to make it penetrate more deeply among the masses. the disk, as representative of the sun, is used in many egyptian hieroglyphs, and received acertuin historic ornament. § share of homage owing to its relation to agricultural devel- opment after the nile had completed its inundation. a combination of the disk and feathered forms produced an ornament generally known as the winged disk, or the winged globe (fig. ). this consists of the solar disk, supported on each side by an asp (the royal symbol of upper and lower egypt), and the wide outstretching wings symbolize the untiring activity of the sun in its beneficence; hence, adivine protecting power. it is emblematic as a whole of the tri- umph of right over wrong, and an inscription at edfou says that thoth, the god of speech and wisdom, ordered that this emblem should be carved over every door in egypt. it is everywhere apparent in egyptian sacred painting, but varies slightly in detail according to the place where it is used. wherever it appeared carved over the doorway of a temple, painted on the walls of a tomb, or woven into a fabric of the vestments of a priest or king, this emblem was a monument i of the egyptian’s religious sincerity and appreciation of benefits derived from his god. . the seambteus.—the scara- baeus, or beetle, fig. , was identified with the rising sun, and typified creation and resurrection, or new birth. its exact significance is somewhat com- plicated, as are in fact all egyptian emblems; but, owing to the habits of the beetle, slowly developing from a grub through various stages to a full- grown insect, it is emblematic of progress and evolution. in the tombs and ruins of the egyptian temples are found fig. . § historic ornament. thousands of models of these beetles that seem to have been worn as amulets. . consistency of egyptian rnament.——another type of egyptian ornament is the palm, from which canopies were made, and also the fans and shades that were held over the heads of royal personages during ceremonies, to protect them from the sun. these few types form the foundation of an immense variety of ornament with which the egyptian decorated the temple of his gods, the palace of his kings, the covering of his person, and his articles of luxury, as well as those articles of more modest daily use, from the wooden spoon that fed him in infancy to the mournful boat that carried his embalmed body across the nile to its final resting place in the valley of the dead. following these types in a manner so nearly allied to the natural form, they observed the same laws that the works of nature'ever displayed, and, no matter how conventionalized their ornament ever became, it was always true. the egyptian artist never violated a natural principle, and, on the other hand, he never destroyed the consistency of his conventional representation by too close an imitation of the type. a lotus flower carved in stone, or forming the graceful termination of a column, or painted flat on the walls as an offering to the gods, was never a lotus portrait, and never impressed the beholder as one that might be plucked, but was always the architectural rep- resentation of it suited to the material in which it was cut, or the colors in which it was rendered. . conventionalism.—a good idea of the simple eon- ventionality of their forms can be obtained from fig. , where at (a) is shown the conventional representation of the lotus blossom, the outside leaves of which, in colored work, were usually painted a deep green. the first row of petals was also green, but of a lighter shade, while the innermost petals were red. the space between the petals was painted a deep yellow. at a distance from the eye, the red and yellow seemed to blend together and form a deep orange historic ornament. § hue with a suggestion of surrounding green, characteristic - of the general appearance 'of the lotus fiower. the transition from (a) in fig. to the form shown at ( ) is by no means a difiicult matter, the omission of the innermost row of petals being the only radical change. from (d) to (c) is a simple development wherein the calyx (b) ( ) (d) flu. . of the conventionalized flower has become larger in propor- tion to the petals, and from (r) to (d) is but a step in orna- mentation, showing the gradual growth of design from the conventionalized rendering of the blossom itself to a device that is purely ornamental and derived from, though in no way representative of, the egyptian lotus. the further development of this form in assyrian and greek art will show the importance of this line of study. . classes of egyptian ornament.—egyptian orna- ment may be divided into three classes: that which is - sfrm'tir'r, or forms a part of the monument itself; that which is n‘prrserztafir/c, but is at the same time conventionally rendered; and that which is simply driroratz'z'e. in each class, the ornament is always symbolic, and the few types mentioned, upon which it is founded, we find are but slightly changed during the entire period of egyptian civilization. . the student of historic ornament should familiarize himself with the difference between the terms style, rlass, and type. the term style is used to indicate the period or nationality of the ornament, as the early egyptian style; the term class is applied when we wish to indicate a subdivision of some style, as the constructive class of the egyptian § historic ornament. style. the term type is used to refer to the natural form from which the ornament is derived, as the lotus type of egyptian ornament. . constructive ornament.—— of the constructive ornament are the columns and their terminations, and the crowning members of the walls. the column base was fre- , '. l v ;" v y- . {/ tum/ , ,, ' viii” q. ‘\ ',_' \ {\y ’/‘// " ' i" ' ‘ ‘ y vh /, vi'l/fi,’ , \_.,'/_ni 'g ‘ ‘ , “i‘m .\ i. fig. . quently molded to represent the root, and the shaft was rceded in representation of the stalk, while the capital was carved similar to the form of a bud or full-blown lotus flower, as shown in fig. , where at (a) is seen the bud historic ornament. § capital, and at (b) the capital derived from the full-blown flower. all this was symbolic, as the lotus meant much to the egyptian. in fig. are shown two square columns standing in the ruins of the temple of karnak, the one to the left being dec- orated with a lotus flower carved in high relief, while the one to the right 'is similarly decorated with the papyrus .,t ,, t'. ;. * ? plant. the plain, severe treatment, so characteristic of egyptian art, is forcibly illustrated here. another form of column flares out at the top, and has for its original type the papyrus or palm tree, as shown in fig. . this style was usually placed in the center of the halls of assembly, with the lotus-bud columns on each side, as shown in fig. . all columns were richly colored and sometimes decorated with hieroglyphs. § historic ornament. feathers were held by the egyptians as emblematic of sovereignty, and the cornices of their temples were usually decorated with ornaments derived from a combination of feathered forms. . representative ornament. ‘ ‘ the second class of egyptian ornament results from the conventional repre- sentation of commonplace things upon the walls of their temples and tombs. in this kind of ornament each repre- sentation is not only a detail of the wall decoration but is a hieroglyphic record of a fact. sometimes it was carved in the surface of the walls, and sometimes merely painted; and occa- sionally, it was both carved and painted. it was always most conventional, and certain details, such as the lotus and papyrus, were represented in the strictest geometrical arrangement, usually show- . ‘\‘&‘,,i$w )wwe ingthebud,blossom, and fruit in regular \ .' order, typifying the c development of the " entire plant. in fig. observe the straight, stifi stem and trumpet-shaped blossom, the sharp-pointed petals of the calyx, and the geometrical arrangement of the entire plant, with all its distinguishing characteristics emphasized to produce i conventionalism. egyptian carved ornament of this character is nearly always in low relief, and is sometimes merely incised or outlined in the sur- face of the wall, as shown in fig. . on work executed in a later period, the background is sometimes cut away, fig. . flo. . historic ornament. § leaving the carved ornament and figures in full relief, as in fig. . this figure represents a statue of the queen, cleopatra, upon whose head is supported, bctween the two horns of the sacred cow, the disk, emblematic of the sun. the head-dress consists of a representation of the blizzard, a sacred bird, whose head protrudes from the fore part of the head-dress, and whose wings reach down on each side, as though pro- flg. . tecting the wearer. the panel or cartouch in the upper left-hand corner contains the hieroglyphic characters spelling the name cleopatra. from this figure, a characteristic example of egyptian ornament of this period, we can obtain a good idea of the contemporary head-dress, of the habit and method of wearing beads and necklaces, and, to a general extent, the cast of features and countenance of this race of people. it must be remembered, however, that these carv- ings are not always portraits, but symbolisms drawn to represent the characteristics of the person portrayed. § historic ornament. . decorative ornament.—the third kind of egyp- tian ornament, that which is purely decorative, is found mostly in paintings on the walls of tombs, on mummy cases and sarcophagi, on dresses and utensils. . the egyptians believed in the immortality of the soul, and also that the soul would return after death and reoccupy the body; hence, they took every means to preserve the body in order that it should be in a fit condition for the reception of the soul at the time of its resurrection. death was not regarded by the egyptian as a great calamity, as he looked on his earthly life as a mere temporary existence during which he made elaborate preparations for the preservation of his body after death. this accounts for the massiveness and per- manency of the tombs, some of which were the life work of those that expected to occupy them. the body was embalmed with great care; a scarabaeus was fastened to the breast, and the mummy wrapped in cloths or bandages bearing hieroglyphic inscrip- tions. in some cases, particularly with the wealthier classes, the mummy thus wrapped was placed in a wooden box, carved inside to fit the form, and generally shaped to conform to the lines of the body on the outside, as shown in fig. . the box was then carefully sealed and the outside painted, or often gilded, and covered with elaborate and complicated hieroglyphs describing the life and deeds of importance connected with the earthly existence of the body within. the mummy case was then deposited in the tomb, frequently in a standing posture, and the walls and columns, and other architectural details of the particular chamber historic ornament. § where the mummy was placed, were painted with rich ornament and inscriptions. the sarcophagus, or stone box, in which the mummy was sometimes placed, was richly orna- mented both with painting and carving of the same general character as on the walls, and it is from examples of this kind that the following illustrations are taken. in fig. is a painted wall ornament from the temple of seti i, and it represents the sacral bar/c, the ceremonies connected with which were an exceedingly complicated but important branch of the religious devotions of the priests. this device frequently appears in the sculpture and paintings of the tombs, and usually represents the funeral of one of the gods. everything is arranged in a most orderly man- ner, as will be observed, and every detail is placed to convey a certain significance. it would be impossible here to go into all the explanations connected with egyptian hiero~ glyphic ornament, and the illustration in fig. is given to show how completely the walls were covered with an illus- trated idea. § historic ornament. . the ffet.—-fig. is a fret design, sometimes called a labyrinth, and is stated by some to have been sug- gested‘by the plan of a building known as the labyrinth that was erected in ancient egypt about b. c. this was '% ., ab supposed to have been a very complicated structure of many hundred rooms, out of which it was practically impossible for one to find his way without the assistance of a guide. the rosette alternating with the labyrinth pattern was prob- ably derived from the full-blown lotus flower. this orna- ment is found on many mummy cases, and is even used for surface decoration, for it can be repeated in any direction simply by continu- ing the lines, as shown at a, to form a new pattern above l“) m and below similar to this one. . it may be said here that the rosette form shown in fig. is but one of many c) q observed in egyptian orna- q ment. in fig. (a) is i shown a simple circle with a q an inner circle, and the space (a) between them is divided ( ! by straight lines into eight equal parts. the transition from this form to the form shown at (b) consists merely of a notehing of the edge of the fig. . historic ornament. § outer circle where the lines intersect the circumference; (c) is the same as (b), except that the dividing lines are made in pairs, thus making each segment independent and by itself. from (c) to (d) the segments are made narrower, until they are very nearly the size of the spaces between them, and at (r) we reach the extreme limit where what might be considered the petals of the floral device are sepa- rated from the center and from one another entirely, and become independent elements of the design. observe that the central circle has been becoming smaller in the evolu- tion of the device from (a) to (e), and the design has worked itself from a purely geometrical form at (a) to a purely floral form at (c) and back again to a purely geometrical form at (r), entirely different from (a). this principle should be borne in mind, as it is of much importance in the tracing of the egyptian style in european art. . in fig. is shown a border wherein the scroll is made use of simply as an ornament, in distinction from its character, as emblematic of the waves of me nz'le. the lotus also appears at the springing of each scroll line, but, in this case, purely in a decorative sense, and in no way fig. . suggestive of a hieroglyphic record. below is a stiff conven- tional row of lotus buds and blossoms, so arranged as to form a conventional border and a part of the design above, purely for decorative purposes! in the hieroglyphs, the symbol for the word water consisted of a simple jagged line § historic ornament. suggestive of waves, as shown in fig. (a). this symbol, when used under certain conditions, was w indicative of the nile also, and in some (a) fig. . of the hieroglyphic ornament it is elaborated into what is called the wave border as shown at (b). . in fig. are shown two borders where the lotus is eonventionalized, very much on the lines of fig. . it is “iii—j in,“ _||,|wiihiiiiiii. (a) : pro. . used here purely for decorative purposes, and in fig. (a), where the side leaves of the flower intersect, a bud is historic ornament. § drawn in order to fill up the intervening space, while at (b) the flower is placed in a horizontal position and shows another application of the lotus to a border that requires little or no explanation, simply being the conventional rendering of the lotus blossom applied in repetition on the border of a wall surface, and completing the simple geo- metrical forms above and below. . fig. shows an application of the scroll without the lotus, while below is a simple serrated band, the type of l i. d“ ' which is suggestive of the hieroglyphic representation of the nile, though its derivation from this origin is by no means certain. these few borders show the immense variety of detail that the inventive egyp- . ml . ' , tian secured from a few simple r‘ “t ' ' types. when he carried his m“ "“ i“ “‘ design further, to make - - plete surface decorations, he did not complicate his designs by adding to them any new forms. . fig. shows a wall decoration from a tomb at thebes. here the scroll, simi- lar to that used in figs. and , is applied as a repeat- ing ornament in four directions, and, in the space enclosed between the lines of the scroll, conventional representations of the lotus petal are drawn, thereby simply suggesting the § historic ornament. _ existence of an idea of lotus origin. it is not a representa- tion of the flower, nor is it intended to be; it is simply a wall decoration, the lines of which, though abstract, owe their origin to the egyptian ever-present association of the nile and the lotus with every- day details of importance. . in fig. we have a border, also taken from a tomb at thebes, wherein the lotus is used in a most conventional manner, but, at the same time, not greatly removed from its original type. the border above and below is a simple rendering of bands varied sufficiently from one another to destroy the appearance of stripes in either direction, and at the same time so arranged as to blend with the whole general effect and not attract the eye to any cer- tain point. . the scroll.-—the use of the scroll as a wall deco' ration, repeating only in two directions, is shown in fig. . compare this figure with fig. and observe that the materials used to create the patterns are identical in both designs. we have the scroll and the lotus, and the lines ’ of the scroll run from one end of the pattern to the other, and between the lines the space is filled with a design from the lotus. not- withstanding this fact, could any two designs be more unlike? the fact that the historic ornament. § scroll lines in fig. extend and repeat only upwards and downwards, would tend to give the pattern the appearance of running in stripes vertically; this is, to a certain extent, offset by reversing the directions of the scrolls, giving each a letter s pattern, thereby preventing any vertical lines from appearing one over the other. as an additional element to destroy this feeling of stripe, the coloring of the lotus flower has been so arranged that the darkest portions will all blend and give the appearance of stripes in a horizontal direction, although really no stripes exist there. observe that in each reversed lotus flower, the horizontal line that cuts it olf at the bottom of the petals is about on a level with the lines of intersection between the individual petals of the next flower, and this, continued, gives a dark stripe alternating with a lighter stripe, running in a horizontal direction throughout the pattern. this in effect destroys the vertical element. the same result is obtained in fig. by the changing of the direction of the figures. each individual element of the design is placed at right angles to the one above and below, or to the one to the left and right of it; a feel- ing of continuity is thereby ".i i i shown in fig. , wherein the . wall surface is divided by a , ’ number of circles, from the i a} . center of each of which spring /' , ft four ornamental forms whose ' outline is based on the three ,, outer leaves of the lotus. ' another pattern based on a fm'w combination of the circle and the square is shown in fig. . the wall surface is cov- ered with tangent circles, exactly as in the previous case, but from the centers of these circles spring four leaves in ~' , e i avoided. ‘ /" ~ e _ i \ ' . . another combination of lines based on the lotus is ._ , _ . §s ' historic ornament. vertical and horizontal directions, thereby suggesting rectan- gular forms connecting the centers of the circles. other foliated forms, in the quadrants of the circles embraced by each pair of these leaves, outline the three petals of a lotus ii “a vwu", i ., i . ‘u i hi u" n" " if] t fig. . as before, in each quarter of the circle, while the spaces out- side of the circumference of the circles are ornamented with a figure smaller than, but almost identical with, the one springing from the centers. a careful analysis of figs. and will again show that the elements, types, materials, and forms of both figures are as near identical as it is possible for any two patterns to be, and yet no two designs could i be more unlike in appearance. ‘ . referring now to fig. , we have a wall deco- ‘ , ration composed of the wave lines associated with the nile, running in different direc- ' tions. trace any one of these lines out and you will see that it simply runs across the pattern‘in a diagonal direction from top to bottom, or from bottom to top. the line that intersects with it runs practically at right angles . historic ornament. § to it and intersects at every wave. the small irregular figures thus enclosed in the wave line are colored distinctly in alternate stripes, and a contrasting figure identical with the figure drawn outside the circumferences in fig. is then stamped in them. . fig. might be at first considered a double render“ ing of fig. , but, strictly speaking, such is not the case. the heavy black lines of fig. in general direction run vertically and horizontally, and the spaces enclosed by each pair of verticals are painted alternate colors, the effect of which is not to give that of q o . o o o stripes, but of a general blend- . ' ‘ " ing of wall surface. observe , c" .; "g . that the colored or shaded v ‘ ‘ i " i i . ' y portions of the pattern are broad, alternating with a con- . o / .c-‘p ', ° necting link of narrow color, i " ' ; ,< while opposite this connecting link, on each side, are the broad portions of the contrasting color. a study of fig. in comparison with fig. will show that the effort to prevent continuity or the effect of a stripe is the same in each case, and the principle by which this appearance is prevented is identical in each case, though the patterns themselves are utterly unlike in principle, type, and manner of execution. fig. . . in fig. , taken from a tomb at thebes, we have a combination of the scroll and the lotus as the running ele- ments of the design, and the scarabaeus and lotus rosette as surface elements or inlays. in this design, five sets of scroll lines spring from each center, the two upper ones branching out to form the top of an enclosing panel and to form the continuity from one scroll to another, while of the three lower ones, one connects in a horizontal direction the th lower scrolls, and the other two serve to form a bottom of a panel and preserve the line of continuity to the scroll below. § ' historic ornament. simple as this arrangement is, it illustrates the ingenuity of the designer. from every springing point, the three characteristic petals of the lotus flower are exhibited, while from the bottom of each pair of scrolls the spreading petals of the full-blown blossom are used to fill the space. in each alternate panel, both vertically and horizontally, the scara- baaus appears in its character- istic hieroglyphic form, and in each alternate panel between is a rosette based on the lotus blossom. . ' it will be unnecessary to describe all the character- istics of the design in fig. ; the student will simply observe that the scroll here consists of but four springing lines, and these are apparently made to serve the same purpose as five in the previous case. the panels enclosed between the lines of the scroll are of a different character, and, though filled with devices similar to the ones in fig. , the general appearance of the design is totally different. we have one element in this design, however, that differs from any of the previous ones dis- cussed, and makes a portion of it belong to the second class of egyptian ornament. heretofore deseribed; that is, the hieroglyphic represen- tation of a fact, the little devices in alternate spaces being hieroglyphic writings descriptive of some of the acts and doings connected with the life of the person to whom the i xii. q historic ornament. § tomb was erected. all this ornament was richly colored, and the effect of it on the walls was due as much to-its system of coloring as to the design itself. . it is impossible here to express in each case, without means of color, the characteristic appearance of each design, but the main point is to exhibit the ingenuity and invention of the egyptian artist in his portrayal of a multitude of different designs, all based on exactly the same idea, and using less than half a dozen different forms. in spite of their simplicity, a careful study of each one of the designs here illustrated will always bring forth a new point so subtle that, though when once discovered it appears most promi- nent, it has for a long time previous remained undiscovered. . egyptian coloring.-in general effect, egyptian ornament was brilliant and many-colored. the reason for this must be borne in mind: the interiors of the egyptian's temples and tombs were pervaded by a deep sepulchral gloom fittingly symbolizing the mysterious character of his religious belief, and, in order that the decorations on the walls should stand out amidst this gloom, it was necessary that the brightest of colors should be used, or the decoration would fade into insignificance. while the egyptian ornament may be said to be thoroughly polychromatic, there are many cases where it depended as much for its expression on carving as on painting. how- ever, egyptian ornament may be considered, in a multitude of cases, as being painted ornament. in their rendering, the egyptians used no shades or shadows, and laid their colors in flat tints only; yet they found no difficulty in conveying to the mind the identity of each object they desired to repre- sent, without a suggestion of shade or shadow. . the palette of the egyptian artist contained seven depressions for seven colors, arranged in the following order: white, yellow, green, blue, red, dark brown, and black. there were two kinds of yellow—a bright yellow and yellow ocher. there were three kinds of blue—an azure blue, a § historic ornament. greenish blue, and a dark blue. the reds were made of burnt ocher, and the general tone of egyptian ornament seems to have inclined more to yellow than to any other color. green was used less than red, yellow, and blue. the egyptian oriental blues are more greenish in hue than a strictly normal blue, and their reds partook of an orange tinge. they appreciated the fact that colors were affected much in their appearance when in juxtaposition to one another, and they made use of this detail to emphasize r detract from the strength of some particular hue. ‘ assyrian ornament.’ . development.—although the early architecture of western asia is_ of little importance so far as its direct influence on the styles of later periods is concerned, it must be given a certain amount of consideration in order that the development and growth of certain subsequent forms may be properly understood under the different conditions. . the ornament of assyria was probably borrowed from egypt, as there are many points of resemblance in the two styles. the sculpture of the assyrians seems to have been a development of that of the egyptians, but descended from it rather than advanced in scale of perfection. egyp- tian sculpture degenerated toward the end of the fourth century b. c., as it expressed an unnatural swelling of the limbs that was at first but lightly indicated and gradually became almost exaggerated—the conventional having been abandoned for an imperfect attempt at the natural. in. assyrian sculpture, the attempt was carried still further, and, while the general arrangement of a subject and the pose of a single figure was still conventional, an attempt was made to express the muscles of the limbs and the rotundity of the flesh to an extent that destroyed all conventionalism. in all art, this is a symptom of decline. nature should be idealized, not copied. historic ornament. § i . assyrian ornament is not based altogether on the same types as the egyptian, but is represented in the same way. in both styles, the ornaments appear in relief, as well as painted, in the nature of hieroglyphic diagrams. with the exception of the pineapple, and the adaptation of the egyptian lotus, assyrian ornament does not seem to be based on any natural type, and the natural laws of radiation and tangential curvature that we find in egyptian ornament are, in the assyrian, observed more as a traditional or borrowed idea rather than an instinct of the people themselves. fig. shows an example of assyrian sculpture supposed to illustrate a scene where the king on horseback is hunting, attended by his servants and arrow bearer. the pose of the figure and the character of the work is strongly suggestive of egyptian origin, but the attempt to express in stone the muscular roundness of the limbs and other parts is indicative of a decline in art. . the assyrian religion differed widely from that of the egyptians, and, though their combinations of forms § historic ornament. resembled, somewhat, certain of the egyptian deities, the style in which they sculptured them was below the standard of art and practice in egypt. fig. is an example of this work representing the winged deity asshur, in which may be seen the excessive effort to represent the rotundity of muscular developments. the attempt to represent the muscular characteristics of this figure is exceedingly inartistic, and, though the attempt to present an appearance of power and strength is well carried out, it is done with much less delicacy and refinement than we would expect if the work were an example of egyptian art. asshur was the supreme deity in the assyrian group of gods, and in the conception of his form there is much that is suggestive of egyptian origin. the hawk head and wings historic ornament. § are surely borrowed from egypt, and the pose of the body and limbs is strongly suggestive of egyptian ideas. the position of the hands seems to be repeated in nearly every example of assyrian ornament where the figure representsa deity, and is similar to certain egyptian productions of the kind, except that the limbs are clumsy and the molding possesses much less refinement. . in fig. is shown the assyrian rendering of the egyptian lotus, and, in fact, this border, which comes from persepolis in assyria, might easily be considered an attempt to copy the example of egyptian ornament shown in fig. (a). fig. shows another example of lotus ornament from the same city in assyria, wherein the detail is almost identi- cal with fig. , but the lotus bud between the two blos- soms is replaced by a device repre» senting the pineapple—a fruit that was sacred in assyrian art. the close resemblance of these forms-to those seen in egypt is almost indlsputable evidence that they were derived from the latter country, and the rosette form shown in fig. , while it appears fre— quently in borders of assyrian orna- ment, must undoubtedly have been developed or adapted from the egyptian device shown in fig. (d). a still fig. . § historic ornament. cruder adaptation of the egyptian lotus to carved ornament in assyrian work is seen in fig. , wherein the surface of the petals is simply indented in a harsh, crude manner, and the outline is carved into seven pointed terminations of the leaves. the use of this ornament in borders, in combination with another crude ornament, is shown in fig. , wherein‘ the outline of the lotus-derived figure shows a little more refinement, as its lines are more grace- fully curved, but wherethe connecting lines between it o‘ o fig. . and the interposed device are arcs of a circle, making the entire composition crude and ina'rtistie. the circu- lar forms with the three-leaved blossom on top_ may be representative of pomegranates, the designs of which were used largely in assyrian decoration. ‘ however, it is of little importance in itself what types were used in this art. the lotus and rosette were undoubtedly borrowed from egypt; the latter, both as shown in fig. and modified in fig. , are easily traceable to designs seen on the banks of the nile. . these few ornaments will sufl‘iee to trace the art of egypt into asia minor' and show in subsequent styles how their altered introduction into european coun- tries was able to harmonize with the style already existing. u. f ill ub. historic ornament. § classic ornaivient. greek ornament. . greece and egypt compared.—before entering on the study of the characteristics of greek ornament, let us for a moment compare the conditions and surroundings of greece with those of egypt. although modern egypt covers a considerable extent of country, ancient egypt included only the section that bordered on the nile. in fact, as we have already suggested, it may be considered simply as the country that was watered by the annual inundations of the nile. the climate here was mild, there being but two seasons—spring and summer—and there was very little variety in the daily life of the inhabitants, except what may have been experienced in the celebration of some national or religious festival. . greece, on the contrary, presents entirely different conditions. it is on the sea, and throughout its long broken shores, the tide ebhs and flows and penetrates far inland through the long clefts in its coast. greece has many moun- tains, too, and this affected her climate inasmuch as they served as watersheds, carrying the rains down and fertilizing the valleys. 'the country, however, is far enough south to receive a tropical sun, and, although its climate ranges from severe cold in winter toa fierce heat in summer, the majority of the time its temperature is warm and comfortable. . character of the greeks.—the people of greece were brave, active, and athletic; their olympian games were world renowned. their bodily culture was extremely fine, but did not compare with their intellect, which was more developed than that of any other nation. the greek lan- guage is rare and complete in structure, and greek literature is unsurpassed. the greek religion was polytheistic, but the greeks did not devote as much attention to the worship § historic ornament. of their gods as did the egyptians. true, they erected vast temples and costly monuments to athena, apollo, zeus, erectheus, and other deities, and these temples, exquisite in form, proportion, simplicity, and perfect harmony, are examples of the finest architecture that the world has ever seen. notwithstanding this mark of reverence to- their gods, the greeks did not embody into every branch of their art some detail or reminder of their religious duties and inclina- tions as did the artists of egypt. the form of the greek’s worship was, in some respects, almost as complicated as that of the egyptian, but his intellect seemed to be more advanced and he was bound less by a superstitious interest in the future condition of his soul, and his fancies naturally sought ideas that in themselves were beautiful to think of and to look at, rather than suggestive of gloom and forebo- dings concerning an uncertain future existence. the development of greek art then takes place along an entirely different line from that of egypt, and though it goes as directly and intelligently to a point of climax, the result- ing forms are' totally different in their character, meaning, and influence on subsequent styles. . we have seen, how the egyptian artists derived their ideas for ornamental design directly from nature, that their types were few, and that they remained unchanged throughout the entire course of egyptian civilization, except in the degree of perfection of execution; and, in this detail, the greatest perfection existed in the most antique examples. we have studied that the assyrian was a borrowed style and possessed no characteristics of an inspired art, but appeared to have been suggested by the art of egypt, and that the suggestions borrowed from the egyptian style were during its decline, and the assyrian artist, instead of advan- cing on the style, carried that decline still further. with greek art, however, we find a vast difference. it was undoubtedly borrowed from both egypt and assyria, but was developed in an entirely new direction, and, unre- stricted by any complicated religious laws, as both egyptian historic ornament. and assyrian art seem to have been, the greek adoption rose rapidly to a high degree of perfection. though the influence of egyptian and assyrian art can be traced in many details of greek designs, those influences are entirely subordinated to the greek feeling applied in their introduc- tion. neither the art of egypt or assyria can be considered to play an important part in the styles of subsequent gener- ations, but the art of greece pervades all subsequent history. . it must be considered, in the study of the greek styles, that the remarkable development was due to their introduction into greece at a critical period of the art devel- opment of that country. greek art carried the perfection of pure form to a point that has never since been reached, and the abundant remains of greek ornament compel us to believe that refined taste was universal, and that the country was overflowing with skilled hands and minds so trained as to enable them to execute these beautiful ornaments with uncrring precision and truth. the beauty of greek ornament, however, lies almost exclusively in its symmetry and form. it is lacking in one of the greatest charms that should always accompany orna~ ment, viz., synzbolzkm; and, despite the pleasure we experi- ence in its beautiful gradations of form and color, greek ornament is meaningless, purely decorative, never repre- sentative, and in few cases it is, in the stricter sense, hardly even constructive. . architecture.—in the architecture, the various members of a greek monument presented exquisitely designed surfaces to receive ornament, which at first was simply painted and in later times carved and painted, but the ornament formed no such essential part of the construc- tion as did that of the egyptians. it could often be removed and the structure remain unchanged. on the corinthian capital (fig. ), the ornament is applied to the surface and is hardly constructed as a part of the capital itself. remove the scrolls and foliated .iw,. fig. . historic ornament. § ornament and there still remains sufi‘icient substance and material for the pier to carry out its purpose. on the egyp- tian capital, however, fig. , the whole capital is an orna- men t, and to remove any portion 'of it would be to destroy both the ornament and structural purpose of the column itself. . . sculpture.—in addition to the skill of the greek artist as a designer, his unerring truth in the use of his chisel renders the work of the earlier periods remarkably interesting to us, but the monumental sculpture of the greeks frequently went beyond the bounds of ornament. for instance, in the frieze of the parthenon, fig. , though comp sed of a series of groups of draped figures, the orna- ment was so far above the eye that it became a mere diagram —an ornamental band around the top of the building, the beauties of which are simply astonishing when observed more closely. every detail of each of the panels was as minutely wrought as though it were to receive the closest inspection. the folds of the garments and the molding of the limbs, even on the side away from the eye, that could never be seen unless the panel was removed from the menu- ment itself, are as carefully modeled as those most prom- inently in sight. - conscientious as this treatment may appear to be, sys tematie and honest as is the execution of a design that was dedicated to one of their gods, we are bound to consider this an abuse of means as a work of art design, and that the greeks were, in this respect, inferior to the egyptians, whose system of broad conventionalized ornament for mom- umental sculpture served its purpose to better effect. . representative types. the examples of greek representative ornament are f cw. in the earlier wall paint. ing, there is a wavy ornament—a fret, somewhat similar to the egyptian, used to distinguish water from land and a few conventional renderings of trees, but nothing of impor- tance was done in this line in the later history of greek art. in the decorative ornament of the greek vases, however, _ there is abundant material to assure us that we have examples § historic ornament. of every type of greek ornament in all its phases. the types are few, but, in their conventional rendering, are so far removed that it is difl‘ieult to recognize any attempt at imitation. an examination of the wall paintings and vases leads to the belief that the forms of the leaves of the greek flowers are due more to the limitations of brush work than to any direct imita— tion of the natural flower. the six forms shown in fig. pm , constitute about all the leaf strokes that are found throughout greek ornament, but these six forms were applied to a variety of purposes, the extent of which is almost past belief. ' . the three great laws of naturaéthat the greek artists carefully observed the principle on which cer- tain plants grew, and carried that principle out conscien- tiously in the execution of their designs, cannot be doubted. they were close observers of nature, and although they did not copy or attempt to imitate or make true portraits of any natural forms, they never violated a natural principle. the three great laws of nature—radialion from the parent slam, the proportionate distribution of arms, and {/ tangent/in! curwalure of the lines—are always obeyed; and it is the unerring perfection with which they are carried out in the most humble works, as well as those of the greatest impor- tance, that fills us with astonishment at the conscientious scruples of ,the greek artist. before we analyze examples of greek ornament, we must first consider the architecture. the greek, like the egyp- tian, spanned his architectural opening with a lintel, and though the width of the opening was, like that of the egyp- tian, governed by the length of the lintel that could be con- veniently quarried, the greek’s knowledge of statics and his highly intellectual mind rendered him more inclined to develop artistic proportions, between the support and the material supported, than is found in any egyptian work. iiiivershy n ‘jndis un in mun-came“ § historic ornament. . orders of design.—-as before stated, the capitals of the egyptian columns were of but three styles—the lotus bud, the lotus blossom, and the palm. these were varied more or less in different locali- flg. . of a pair of scrolls, or volutes, supported upon a thumb mold- ing similar to a (limin- ished form of the doric, as shown in fig. . ; and the corinthian order, fig. , whose capital has been before referred to. in the last named, the top of the column is swelled out into a bell shape, not unlike the palm column of egypt, but is decorated with leaves and vines and scrolls, and other forms based . on from the types ties, but all being the devel- opment of a single principle, can hardly be called different orders of design from one another. in the greek, how- ever, we have three distinct orders, or systems, of design, the distinguishing character- istic of each being the capital of the column; these orders are the dorie, whose column is topped with a capital con- sisting of a simple slab over a thumb-shaped molding, as shown in figs. and ; the ionic, whose capital consists ! l \ . “i‘m ( fig. . vegetable world. the volute, or scroll, of the ionic capital some authorities endeavor to trace back to the lotus blossom; § historic ornament. other authorities claim that its origin'is in assyria or persia, certain forms of column there being treated with the scroll. however, it matters little whence came the idea, inasmuch fig. . as it is so elaborated as to bear scarcely any resemblance to its original type. the bottom, or foot, of each of these columns differs somewhat from the egyptian type also. . bases—it will be remembered that the egyptian column was usually rounded olf so that it was smaller at the bottom, and painted or carved, representative of the root of a growing plant. the doric column sits flat on the ground historic ornament. § or plinth without any molded base whatsoever, and its sides are cut in channels, or grooves, each pair of which meet in an edge, or arris, that extends all the way to the capital. these may have been derived from the reedings of the egyptian columns, imitative of the reeds of the growing plant. in fact, it has been practically conceded by nearly all authoritiesthat the doric column is a development of a certain form of egyptian column; but, as said before, though the greeks borrowed ideas from the egyptians, they carried them to a higher state of perfection, and in nothing is this more evident than in the columnar elements of their architecture. the bases of the ionic and corinthian columns are regu- larly molded, and though it is difficult to trace any direct origin to the system of moldings that appear so uniformly on these bases, it is simply necessary to bear in mind the fact that, in the three orders of greece, two of the columns possess bases, and one of them—the doric—is without that detail. the mathematical proportions of these orders we will consider later, when we can compare them with their roman modifications. . classic moldings.—in greek architecture all of the moldings are profiled on the curve of some conic section. before analyzing the outlines of these greek moldings and the methods of contouring them, let us first give our atten- tion to the conic sections from which they seem to have been derived. i . in fig. are shown two similar cones a be and ade, which are in contact with each other at their vertexes a, and whose bases ( c and de are circular and at right angles to the axes a f and a f’. if either of the cones be intersected or cut by a plane, which is parallel to one of its elements or sides, as be, the line of intersection will be a parabola, as at g]: i; but, if, instead of being parallel to the side be, the cutting plane makes an angle with it, the curve formed by the intersection will be either an ellipse or a hyperbola, § historic ornament. according to the angle. it will be an ellipse when the cut- ting plane is more nearly parallel with the base of the cone than it was in the case of the parabola, and passes through both sides as at jk; and the line of intersection will be a hyperbola when the cutting plane is more nearly perpen- dicular to the base than it was in the case of the parabola, as shown at [m n and p g. . in the case of the hyperbola, the plane will always cut both cones, thereby giving two branches to the curve_ and these branches will be farther apart as the cutting plane recedes from the axes of the cones. the nearer the plane approaches the axes of the cones, the straighter will become the sides of the inter- secting curve, and as the plane recedes from the axes, the rounder and nearer circular will be the intersection, though no matter how closely the curve of intersection may approach the arc of a circle, it can never become absolutely circular in form. the hyperbola becomes two intersecting straight lines when the plane passes through the vertex; these two lines are most divergent when the plane is parallel with the axes of the cones, and gradually become closer together as the plane approaches a position parallel with the side of the cone, where the hyperbola reaches its limit in a straight line. this straight line is the common limit of both hyperbola and parabola, as any deviation from it will produce one or the other of these curves, according to the direction of that deviation. . as the plane of the ellipse becomes more nearly parallel to the base of the cone, the ellipse approaches the historic ornament. § form of a circle, which it finally becomes, when the axis of the cone and the cutting plane are perpendicular to each other, as at r: t, and as the plane of the ellipse approaches the vertex of the cone the ellipse diminishes in size until it reaches its limit in a point. from a point to a circle, then, is the limit of curvature of the ellipse. . in geometrical drawing, methods are given in examples and for drawing an ellipse and a parabola of any desired proportions, and it is only necessary to add here the method of contouring the hyperbola. to draw a hyperbola of a given width and height, the axis ab, fig. , is laid down perpendicular to the width cd, in the same manner as for the parabola, and the rectangle c d f e is constructed with ' equal to the base of the hyperbola, and the height equal to the axis ( ). divide one half the base and also each side into any number _of equal parts, and con- nect the points of division on the sides with the vertex a by means of the lines a , a , a , etc. the points of division on the base are connected by lines to some point x on the line of the axis a [ extended; the points of intersection of these two series of lines will determine points on the hyperbolic curve, taking the lines in the order as they recede from point e; x can be at any distance above a, and the curved lines ac and ad will _ approach more nearly the curves of the parabola as the point becomes more remote. on the other hand, the nearer the point .r is to the vertex a, the more ac and ad will approximate to a straight line, and when points x and a coincide, the line ac will be a straight line. § historic ornament. . . to draw a tangent to any point of the hyperbola, first draw a line from the desired point g perpendicular to the axis a b, and on the extended axis a ', describe the semi- circle akx, with a radius la equal to .} ax; then, with a radius equal to g i ll, describe the semicircle lk/z intersecting aim: at k; draw kz' per- pendicular to a x, and connect ig; then ig m will be the tangent required. a a: . there are, gener- ally speaking, eight mold- ings used to separate different members and surfacesfrom one another, and these eight are shown in fig. . the fillet a is simply a square-edged band used to separate individual members of a group of moldings. the (yum room b is more commonly known as a crown molding, as it is ' used in the uppermost portions of a composition; at c is the gum reru'rsa, the contour of which is the direct opposite of l)’; at d is the media, or hol- low molding ;‘ at e is the a/zz'nus, or egg-shaped molding, at f is the bead, a small molding similar in use to the fillet, but with a round, instead of rectangular, section. at g is the scolia, the contour of which is practically the reverse of the echinus; ~and at h= is the torus molding, used almost exclusively around the bases of the columns, as shown in figs. and , g, aghast new fig. . historic ornament. § wherein the bases of the ionic and corinthian columns each consist of two torus moldings, separated by a sauna and fil/els. in fig. , the principal molding at the top of the doric column, it will be observed, is the echinus. the application of the other moldings will be discussed as exam- ples of them occur. . doric rder.—as seen in the illustration of the parthenon, fig. , there is little carved ornament in the doric order, except such as appears in the sculpture of figures and animals, and, though in the ionic order there are a few examples of relief ornament, it is in the corinthian order we find the greatest relief and broadest demonstration of surface work. . ionic order.—in fig. is shown a frieze from the principal ionic temple in athens, the erechtheum, the style of which is typ- ical of this class of relief ornament throughout greek design. it is plainly a development; ‘ in relief, of the brush forms shown in fig. ; and the addition of scrolls at the bottom, and leaves, from which the forms appear to spring, is due to a conventionalization of the acanthus leaf, which first makes its appearance in art through its introduc- tion into greek architecture. . corinthian order.—in fig. , however, is shown a section of ornament from the choragic monument of lysic- rates at athens. this is the principal. structure of greek origin designed in the corinthian order. fig. is an orna- ment from the top of the above monument, and shows not only the elaboration of ornament characteristic of this order, but also a principle of ornamental design that is of the § historic ornament. utmost importance in its relation to the lack of invention of new forms and the restraining influences of certain art periods. it will be observed here that the various parts of fig. . the acanthus scroll grow out of one another in a continuous line. this is a principle of design that originated with the greeks, and was continued by the romans, after which, as we shall see, it was abandoned, and the abandonment of this simple principle was sufficient to gen- erate an entirely new order of forms and ideas. in fig. is shown a form of the acanthus leaf taken from the tower of the winds at athens. it is purely conventional in form, pos- sessinga broad, bold treatment, nec- essary for its execution in stone, and following closely the principles of the growing -plant, as do all other developments in greek ornament. fig. . historic ornament. § these few examples of greek constructive ornament are most important just now, as they contain the principles from which certain later forms were developed, though they are of no great importance in subsequent history, except so far as they were developed and extended by the more voluptuous though degraded art of rome. . surface ornmnent.—of the surface ornament, purely decorative in character, we have a great variety in greece, though all of it is based on a few simple types, and restricted almost entirely to variations of the brush forms shown in fig. . the first exceptions to this, however, are the fret forms used extensively both in the architecture and — (a) (b) ' ‘ fig. . ceramics, of which fig. (a) and (b) are typical examples. the meandering line of fig. (a) is continuous and forms the entire pattern, while in (b) the pattern is composed of two lines that are carried through the fret parallel, to its center, where they cross each other and retrace their steps out of the labyrinth. . in fig. is a portion of a repeating border consist- ing of a number of brush strokes in the form of a palmcflz' or § historic ornament. ant/zemz'on, and then enclosed in a single stroke, by which it is joined to a repetition of the same form. this is typical in certain classes of greek pottery, and is usually executed in a reddish color on a black ground. . anthemion.—the anthemion is one of the most characteristic of greek forms. it exemplifies most perfectly the beauty of radiation, of tangential union, and of the proportionate distribution of areas. in fig. is shown at (a) an ornamental form occasionally met with in the earliest examples of greek work, whose identity can be readily traced back to the lotus by comparison with fig. the greek development of this form into fig. (b) is not hard to comprehend. the radiating leaves are made larger and fewer. the calyx, from which they spring, is diminished to a couple of conventional scrolls, and a sweeping out- line encloses the whole device. the figure is sufficiently like that in the design shown in fig. to establish the origin of the latter; and, in fact, numerous cases of the appli- (b) cation of the anthemion or palmette ornament, both in sculptured and painted work, will be met throughout the study of greek art. fig. . fig. . . . greek lily.—in fig. is shown another pattern ‘ where the palmette is formed of brush strokes in black upon a reddish ground, with a form somewhat resembling the greek lily between each pair. the palmette form in this figure is rather more densely drawn than the anthemion in historic ornament. § fig. , and is representative of the class of ornament usually termed the greek lwnrysucklc. the conventional form between these anthemions just referred to—the greek nq/a’ne/ane/a i fig. . lily—is traceable back to the old egyptian lotus form, as are many other greek details. fig. shows at (a) an outline form of the lotus seen in many of the hieroglyphs. variations of the form shown at (b) are seen in both egyptian and greek work, while at (c) (a) (b) ( ) fig. . is the brush-stroke device, usually distinguished under the name of the greek lz'ly. the foliated form between the palmettes in fig. is undoubtedly an adaptation of the lily to fit around the brush strokes of the intermediate figures, and the reaching of the outward leaves back toward each other is suggestive of the treatment of the lotus flower, both as used in assyria, fig. , and in egypt, fig. (a). § historic ornament. . in fig. we have a rosette pattern, repeated at intervals in reddish color on a black ground, that is almost undoubtedly of egyptian origin, as shown in fig. , although its developmeflt on a similar line of thought may fig. . have been reached in greek art. it is painted around the necks and bases of many vases, however, and is used so much in greek ceramics that we associate it very largely with that style of art. . fig. , another pattern undoubtedly of egyptian origin, brings us to the consideration of the scroll in the surface decoration of greek work. this pattern must cer- tainly have been borrowed from the symbol of the nile seen fig. w. in the egyptian hieroglyphs, and though there has been little change in the idea, we find a refinement of its propor- tion and lines, and an improvement in its details from an art standpoint, even though it has lost all its symbolic character. . fig. is another adaptation of an egyptian idea, as may be seen by referring to fig. , wherein the scroll is historic ornament. § repeated as growing out from a device of the same kind, and a foliated form, slightly suggestive of the lotus, fills the space between each pair. the rosette, similar to that shown in fig. , is also used as a termination of this scroll, and flo. . this combination of the scroll growing out of the scroll and terminating in a rosette or flower, is of vast importance in roman art, although on this simple vase border is the first place we find it among the greeks. . gullloche.—in fig. is shown an interlaced ornament used almost entirely in carved work on the torus run/dings at the base of a column. it represents, supposedly, the woven bands around the bottom of a shaft composed of fig. . a bunch of reeds, and serves to bind them together. the name of the ornament is a gullloche, and different forms of it, varying in complexity, are found throughout greek art. . fig. shows examples of raised or relieved orna- ment, as seen in the details of the temple of athena polias, § historic ornament. ‘ -.l mw} mm“ mi ruin fig. . all»...a'it'hmi'lii!iii!lh'ii ' in the erechtheum at athens. the enrichment on the cyma recta j is thelotus-flowerornament, and is carved in very low relief; that is, cut so as to be raised slightly above the surface of the mold- ing, and not sunk into it, as was customary with the egyptians (see fig. ). as we examine later monuments of greek architecture, we find the relief of the carvings increasing, until, when we reach the greco-roman period, the stems and stalks are in many instances so under-cut as to be almost clear of the molding. the waterleaf carving on the cyma 'reversa occurs three times in this entablature, and is of varied form, according to its location. up under the corona at a, where the shadow is deep and dark, the waterleaf is cut broad and bold, but imme- diately below the cyma at b, and above the upper facia at r, the lines of the leaf are drawn longer and narrower, so that the .moldings appear in more historic ornament. § delicacy of outline, where the full strength of the light strikes it. the same thing may be said of the bead mold- ings under the corona at d and under each of the two lower cymae reversa: at e and f. the one in the shadow of the corona, as at d, is cut into long beads, while the one above the corona, as at e', is divided into much more minute divisions; and the one on the top of the upper facia, as atf, being in the strongest light of all, is turned into forms where the bead is simply a tiny sphere between two pairs of disks of the same diameter. the egg-and- dart ornament of the ovolo occurs here above the corona of the entablature at g and under the guilloche and volutes of the capital, the only difference in these two examples being that the one above the corona is carved upon a straight ovolo extending along the top of the corona, while the other is carved in the circular echinus surrounding the top of the column. the honeysuckle ornament cut on the neck of the column is in low relief, the same as that upon the crown moldingj. the guilloche immediately under the lines of the volute is carved as a thin strap, loosely braided, around the top of the column, and the same ornament is cut on the upper torus of the base. . 'poiychromy is the term applied to the ornamenta— tion of sculptured and architectural works by means of colors. in ancient buildings these colors were made to cover both flat surfaces and architectural details, while in statues or individ- ual portions of the human figure and drapery, and in other products of plastic art, separate features of a sculptured ornament were colored in a manner characteristic of the subject. egyptian polychromy, on columns, bases, capitals, entab- latures, wall spaces, and, in fact, almost everything of an architectural character, expressed itself in a series of highly ‘ colored designs in low relief, consisting mostly of figures and hieroglyphs, and often of purely decorative ornament. in greek architecture a complete system of color had been developed at an early period, particularly as applied to doric § historic ornament. temples, upon numerous remains of which traces of this colorin'g are distinguishable. the principal use of color in architecture is to bring out decoration. surfaces may be relieved bya rich play of color without actual relief, and ideas may with facility be expressed by colors, when the object they embellish calls for the widest possible range of imagination and fancy. still, color has its own province, and to a certain extent its own series of forms, and must therefore be treated in its own manner. a harmonious inter- play of colors, with correct propor- tion in the distribution of each, is characteristic of a fine work of art. in truly artistic periods, color has never been made use of to produce artificial shadows or to bring out artificial depths and reliefs; nor has it in any way been employed as a makeshift for them. . figs. and showa num- ber of examples of greek painted ornament in which the fret and the lotus and honeysuckle ornament are i ' ' ’ both prominent. red, yellow, blue, ' and green were the principal colors usedby the greeks in these decora- tions, but they were so toned down and softened that the glare and harshness of such brilliant colors were blended into one delightful monotint as one viewed their struc- tures from a distance. fig. is a portion of the capital. fig. . historic ornament. § entablature, and pediment of the greek doric order, vwith the characteristic polychromatic ornamentation. the fret- work on the abacus at a was usually executed in a dark red or black, while the groundwork was pale yellow or orange. the egg-and-dart ornament on the echinus of the capital was generally printed in red on a dark-blue ground. the triglyphs c were nearly always blue, and any ornament e on them was executed in red. the metopes f were generally red, and the sculptured figures with which the metopes were ornamented were painted in tints that represented the color and texture of their garments. the fret drawn on the twnia, or fillet, gand those on the corona and epitithidas, as at /l and a’, were usually executed in gold, though occasionally in red. the regula: j were blue with red drops, or guttae k, as were also the mutules l, .. v - but the soflit of the corona m, shown in fig.‘ , was red. the small moldings forming the finish to the corona were generally painted in light colors, such as red and blue, with spaces of white alternating between. the honeysuckle or lotus ornament, usually found on the cyma recta or ovolo , shown in fig. , when either was the top molding of the pediment, was carefully outlined in gold, and was always drawn very lightly and delicately when used to embellish this top member of the entablature. fig. . . in fig. we arrive at a more complicated pattern of the honeysuckle ornament, taken from the temple of theseus at athens. in this example, the palmette forms, composed of nine brush strokes, were executed in green, and the scrolls and connecting fine lines between members of the pattern were worked in gold. the intermediate blossom between the palmettes, or conventionalized floral form, was in red, and the whole executed on a creamy § historic ornament. ground. the effect was naturally very brilliant, the red and green colors standing out very sharply on the creamy ground, and contrasting beautifully with each other. wig diwojddoidpidididiojdi l'i' i m" i " in their colored ornament, the greeks appreciated the strengthening effect of placing one color beside another, and in much of their work made use of this combination of red and green on account of its superiority of effect. in figs. . and are two panels taken from the ceiling of the parthenon. \vhile these at first seem somewhat sim- //l /////fi'/i ////é / //wim '- /, . . \ “sm-sfifi.“ >‘~t$\i\\\‘t>s\\\\ fig. . fig. . ilar in appearance, and though both are plainly executed with purely brush forms, a second examination will show i historic ornament. § that they are entirely different as a whole, and unlike in their detail, except the form of their individual strokes. the lines of the pattern itself were executed in gold, that of fig. being on a red ground with a blue border around it, while the pattern in fig. was on a blue ground with a red border. this difference of coloring emphasized not only the difference in pattern of the two panels, but, at the same time, clearly marked the dividing line between them. . in fig. is shown a frieze ornament wherein the entire design is executed in the contrasting colors of red and green on a ground of cream. the central stroke of the honeysuckle ornament and of the figures on each side are green, and each alternate brush stroke from them is green also, with intermediate strokes of red. the genera- ting line, which encloses the honeysuckle ornament and curves into the base of the intermediate figure, is green, but the triangular stroke at the base of the honeysuckle is red. this design, like the two previous ones discussed, is depend- ent entirely on the limitaflons of brush work for the char- acter of its form, while the contrast of color in the different strokes of its composition gives to the design the brilliancy of effect in no way obtainable in a pattern executed in a monotint. - fig. . . antcflxm.—rcferring back to fig. , it will be observed that all along the edge of the roof are a number of small vertical ornaments. these are antefixre, and are so placed to close the end of each row of tiles with which the roof was covered. though they were carved in marble, and designed to fit the end of the tile, they were modeled after the palmette, whose characteristics were governed, as is so much other greek ornament, by the capabilities of the brush stroke. a § historic ornament. in fig. is shown one of these antefixae, the scrolls and vertical strokes of which were green, and the space between the two scrolls and each alternate stroke above them were painted red. . endless examples could be recalled exhibiting one or more of the numerous characteristics of greek orna- ment, but, like the egyptians, their. types were few, and it is the repetition of a single idea, or its combination with not more than one other idea, that lends what variety there is to greek ornament. there are one or two forms used in later art that undoubt- edly had their origin on greek soil, but they were developed to so much greater extent in a later period that their details will be considered in the later style. fig. . etruscan o rnam ent. . the etruscans were a people inhabiting the middle part of italy from a period of most remote antiquity. it is probable that they came originally from the same asiatic race as did the greeks, and their occupation of italy seems to date from about the same period as the settlement of greece. their language has never been translated, how- ever, and we therefore have no written history to verify this belief. . in the settlement of rome, the etruscans played an important part. they were a highly artistic people, while the early roman was a warrior and had no art taste what- ever. the etruscans introduced the arch into the construc- tions of public utility, and in that way it found a place in the architecture of rome. besides their skill as builders, the etruscans were particularly deft in ceramics and goldsmith- cry, and, though the character of their designs bears a strong historic ornament. § resemblance to those of egypt and greece, their style was unique, and was developed on independent lines. in designs and workings for jewelry, they were original and skilled, and etruscan jewelry was much sought even in artistic greece. under their skilful hands, every conceivable object was worked into the design. flowers, fruits, figures, vases, cornucopia, rose work, crescents, ellipsoidal balls, and chains of all sorts and sizes found a place in their jewelry designs. they used the emerald a great deal more than any other of the precious stones, on account of a superstition that it possessed medical qualities, but pearls, glass paste, cameos, and intaglios were used also, and the variety and taste in this line of ornament exceeded that of any other nation. . 'there are many objects of etruscan design that are still considered masterpieces of art; and diadems, crowns, necklaces, ear drops, bracelets, hairpins, and rings are still designed on the lines originated by the etruscan goldsmiths. scarabaei are very frequently introduced in these designs, and are sometimes used as a link to unite two parts. in fact, this device appears so frequently in their jewels, uten- sils, sword hilts, etc. that it would appear probable that the etruscans worshiped this insect, or associated it with some superstitious idea. the scarabaaus of the etruscans differed materially from that of the egyptians, inasmuch as it was usually carved of precious stone, or metal, whereas the egyp- tian device was most frequently painted, though many of them were worked in metal and worn as rings and jewelry. § historic ornament. . in fig. is shown a necklace, the centerpiece of which consists of an elaborate piece of goldsmith's work, set with precious stones, the central stone being a large emerald carved in the form of a face. the connecting links of the chain are designed in gold with intermittent precious stones. this is characteristic of all etruscan ornament, and only one illustration is introduced here, as it is simply necessary to consider etruscan art briefly, in order to preserve the thread of history, that we may better understand the influence of these people on the art of rome. gregg-roman ornament. . historical relations.—-in the year b. c., greece was conquered by rome, and the progress of pure greek art suddenly ceased. the invasion of greece and her _ colonies, by roman workmen, caused the art,after this period, to become more and more tainted with the unrefined taste of the conquering nation. on the other hand, greek artists executed vast works on roman soil, and the subjected nation became the leaders of fashion in matters of art. the subtle refinement of the greek, however, became lost in the extravagant demands of roman taste, and the result- ing roman art possessed none of the finer characteristics of the greek style. greek art was delicate, refined, and poetic ——rornan art was voluptuous, vulgar, and extravagant. greek art was an expression of pure beauty—roman art was an ostentatious display. ' . during the period of transition when greek forms were undergoing degradation at home, and conquering roman art abroad, the style assumed a peculiar form that was neither greek nor roman. this style we will now con- sider under the name of greco-roman, though in modern times it is more often termed pom/man from the fact that we derive the bulk of our information concerning it from the recently excavated city of pompeii, which was destroyed through an eruption of mt. vesuvius in the year a. d. historic ornament. § . after greece came under roman dominion, the (ever increasing introduction of greek art into the roman school caused the productions from etruria to assume pecul- iar characteristics, as the local works of art yielded entirely to the influence of the conquered country. the ancient romans possessed nothing of their own worthy of the name of art. in their earliest period, they borrowed ideas from the etruscan builders, and it is from them that the use of the vault and arch are introduced for the first time in archi- tecture. this introduction of a new architectural principle naturally wrought a change in the character of the ornament, and the workmen from etruria, under the influence of, and association with, the workmen from the greek colonies, naturally combined the art of greece with the structural and engineering devices of their native country. when the gen- erals of the roman army returned from conquered greece and brought back as plunder the objects of art that decorated greece and her temples, they converted rome into a museum of greek antiquities, the presence of which changed and directed the roman taste. . mural painting—in decorative painting, par- ticularly that applied to the walls of dwelling houses, the romans borrowed everything they could from greece, and greek art became the ruling fashion of rome. we know little of the plan of the greek residences, and nothing of their decoration, but it is safe to assume that the decorations of the houses of pompeii and herculaneum were patterned after the decorations of the greek dwellings seen by the - roman generals in their campaign in that country. these two cities were suburbs of rome, and possessed much the same character as a modern summer resort. the decora- tions of the walls, ceilings, and pavements are totally differ- ent from anything we find in rome, and, at the same time, show elements that must undoubtedly have originated in greece. these wall paintings are not all of the same value, and a number of them seem to have been executed by inferior § historic ornament. artists, but the beauty of others has led to the belief that they were copies and repetitions of greek work of great celebrity. . besides decorative painting at pompeii, we find a more or less imperfect polychromatic coloring in mosaic. this branch of roman art, therefore, became subjected to serious modifications, the romans already possessed a rudi- mentary knowledge of mosaic work and they now received examples of it from the hands of the greeks, in a more advanced state; but the inherent love of luxury in wealthy rome, and the general contempt for matters of expense, caused the taste for mosaic work to increase and acquire real progress. the romans, however, were not long perverting the nature of the art that the greeks had transmitted to them. the exquisite taste possessed by the greeks, and displayed in their distribution of ornament, together with their advanced imitative science, would have enabled them to have realized charming conceptions in mosaic, and the greeks would never have attempted to place mosaic in competition with the high- est prerogatives of painting. . the greeks are supposed to have designed the compartment of their own paved floors to represent such ornaments as branches, scrolls, festoons, and interlacings, and possibly passed onwards from these capricious forms— somewhat of the nature of arabesques—to more significant symbols and attributes, such as griffins, chimeras, tragic and comic masks, signs of the zodiac, birds, fruits, etc. it may even be inferred that the idea must have occurred to them to inlay a scene in the center panel of some of their richer pavements. at any rate, whatever the greeks saw fit to work in their mosaic, must certainly have been designed in temperance, good taste, and with the highest artistic feeling. . it was characteristic of the romans to carry every- thing to excess; and, as the romans admired mosaics, they wished to have them everywhere ' historic ornament. § they were no longer satisfied to floor their courts and lower rooms with them, but inserted them in the sides of their walls, in the soffits of their arches, and in their ceil- ings. in fact, it is probable that they made more use of them in the latter positions than in the floors, as they soon became to be deemed of too great beauty and value to be trampled under foot. now, with the introduction of mosaic pictures in the side walls, ordinary pebbles, stones, natural or colored marbles, paste, and terra cotta were unable to contend with the bril- liancy of paintings, especially as the taste of painters seemed to be impelled by a mad love of gaudy color and richness, so they introduced red, purple, and azure pigments, and metallic gold and silver to produce a deceptive glitter and striking contrast. mosaic consequently demanded fresh resources, and various precious stones, such as agate, jasper, carnelian, sardonyx, emerald, turquoise, and lapis lazuli, were pressed into service, in order to produce the required effects. thus, roman mosaic work became an ornamental untruth. its productions claimed to be portraits of various objects, executed solely to please the eye, and of materials best suited to the purpose; while, as a matter of fact, they were incapable of portraying natural forms, and the materials were more suitable for pavements than for side walls. the idea was false, and even if the mosaic worker had had more shades at his command, and the painter had had fewer colors, the strife would certainly have been much in favor of the latter. mosaic could never rationally supersede painting. . pompeian ornament—the system of pompeian ornament was carried to the very limit of caprice, and almost any theory of coloring and decoration could be supported by authority from pompeii. the general arrangement of the decoration of the walls in the interior of a pompeian house consisted of a dado about one-sixth the height of the room, on which stood broad pilasters half the width of the dado, thus dividing the walls into three or more large panels. the pilasters were united by a frieze at the top, varying in width, § historic ornament. but usually about one-fourth the height of the wall. the space above the frieze was frequently left white, and always subjected to most delicate treatment, representative of clear sky or open air; and on the background were painted fan- tastic architectural buildings that form a component part of the character of the style. in the best examples there was a gradation of color from the ceiling downwards, ending usually with black in the dado; but this is far from being a fixed law. . the colors used were mostly yellow, green, red, and black, and these were used almost indiscriminately for the various parts. black or blue was occasionally used for the panels, but, as a rule, these colors were confined to the dado. pilasters of yellow or green seemed to be the more popular tints, and red, green, and blue, with an occasional example of black, predominated in the panels. the most effective arrangement seems to have been a black dado with red pilasters and frieze, and with yellow, blue, or white panels, the upper part above the frieze being white with colored decorations on it. the best arrangement of color for ornament on the ground appears to have been masses of green and blue, with sparing use of red and yellow on the 'black grounds; white in thin lines and yellow in masses on the blue grounds; and white and blue in thin lines on the red grounds, with a limited use of yellow, as this color is not very effective on red. the pompeian yellow approaches orange in hue, and the red is strongly tinged with blue. the neutral character of the colors thus enabled them to be used violently without discord. ' i . the whole style of this system of decoration is so ' capricious that it is beyond the range of true art, and strict criticism cannot be applied to it. it generally pleased the eye by its novelty, but, though it was not‘ absolutely vulgar, it oftentimes approached vulgarity, and owed its greatest charm to the light, sketchy, freehand manner of its execu- tion, which is quite impossible to render in any modern drawing. historic ornament. (part .) classic ornament. rolian ornament. . comparison of roman and greek art.~-the real greatness of the romans seems to be expressed more in their theaters, public baths, aqueducts, and other works of a public character, rather than in the decoration of their tem- ples. the latter were but the outward expression of a religion they had acquired largely from the greeks, and in which they had little faith, and therefore showed a corre- sponding want of earnestness in the art worship. in the greek temple, it is more than apparent that the great struggle was to attain a perfection worthy of the gods. in the roman temple, the aim was self-glorification. from the base of the column to the apex of the pediment, every part of the structure was overloaded with ornament, tending more to dazzle the eye by the quantity than to excite admiration by the quality of the work. true, the greek temples when painted were as elaborately ornamented as those of the romans, but with a, different effect. the ornament was arranged so that it threw a colored bloom over the § for notice of the copyright, see page immediately following the title page. historic ornament. * § whole structure, and in no way disturbed the exquisitely designed surfaces that received it. the romans ceased to value general proportions and con- tours, and destroyed them by elaborate surface modeling, and extensive'molded ornament. the chief fault of this system of decoration lies in the fact that it does not seem to grow naturally from the structure, but is applied directly to the surface in the same way that was suggested in connec- tion with the foliage on the greek-corinthian capital, only in the present case it is exaggerated to a greater extent. the five orders of architecture. the greek orders- . classic architecture.—the orders heretofore re- ferred to furnish us with a standard of proportion with which we can measure all the classic monuments, and by which the work of the renaissance was, and much of the modern archi- tecture is still, proportioned. as we have already seen, the structures of the classic ages were nearly all columnar—either with lintels connecting the tops of the columns, as the greeks built, or with arches, according to the roman custom. now, the architects of the classic ages had reduced to an exact system the proportions of lengths to thickness in columnar work, and down to the present day we have been unable to improve on their pro- portions. this system is universally known as the “ five orders of architecture," and it embraces every combination of lines and masses seen in the classic monuments. in it we find the fundamental principles of proportion, and only by the most careful study of these principles can we appreciate the importance of architecture as a fine art. . archltectural meaning of rder.-—in its archi- tectural meaning, the term order refers to the system of § historic ornament. columniation practiced by the greeks and romans, and is used to denote the column and entablature together—that is to say, the upright supporting piers, and the horizontal roof beams or trabcatz'an supported by them. these two divisions constitute an order, and so far all orders are alike; but the form and proportions of the subdivisions of both the col- umn and the entablature make it necessary to divide the original greek orders into three classes, and when these three were adopted by the romans, they again divided two of them, making five in all. hence, it has become customary, in referring to the five orders of architecture, to mean the roman forms. the three original orders of the greeks are the doric, ionic, and corinthian, as explained before. each order is an assemblage of parts subject to uniform, estab- lished proportions, and is regulated by the office each part has to perform. this so called “assemblage of parts” refers to the base, shaft, capital, architrave, frieze, etc., while the “ uniform, established proportions" are the comparative sizes of these parts to one another in the same order. “the office each part has to perform " governs its size, shape, and position, and thus completes the expression of character in the order. . greek-dorlc ‘.—th general character of the greek-doric order is expressive of grandeur, dignity, and simplicity. hence, we find it used almost exclusively in temples dedicated to the most revered of the greek deities, such as the parthenon, at athens. this is the most ancient of all the classic orders, and the proportions of its parts vary considerably in the different periods of its history. however, it reached the zenith of its perfection in the parthenon, as shown in fig. of historic ornament, § , and it is from the portico of that temple we take the example illustrated in fig. . it has already been observed that the greek-doric column consisted only of the shaft b filling the space between the stylobate a and the capital c. the latter is composed merely of an ec/zinus molding under an abacus, which is the plain square slab upon which the architrave d rests. the historic ornament. § greek-doric order never possessed a base, but stood upon a stylobate a, which is the substructure or foundation usually disposed in three steps or divisions that extend entirely around the building, and by spreading the ground line of the structure, >- m; flo. . give a proper feeling of solidity and support. in the outline of the column, we first observe contraction and then expan- sion; the former where the echinus converges to the neck of the column, and the latter where the column swells out to form a firm and substantial support at the bottom, which is § historic ornament. larger than the top. with few exceptions, the column of the greek-dorie order is fluted; that is, its surface is grooved perpendicularly by a series of concave channels that touch each other and form a series of ridges, or arrz'srs, upon its surface—a mode of decoration that is the direct opposite of that practiced by the egyptians, some of whose columns exhibit, not channels, but a series of convex ridges, like a bunch of reeds or stems bound together. in the doric order, the number of channels is either sixteen or twenty, though in the other orders there are usually twenty-four. the number varies, but it is invariably divisible by . doric flutings are much broader and shallower than those of the ionic or corinthian orders—broader for two reasons, first, because they are fewer in number, and therefore divide the circumference into larger parts; and, second, because there are no separating fillets between them. the shallowness of the doric flutes is due to the fact that the arrises, or edges where the flutes come together, would be thin and liable to breakage if the flutes were deeply cut. this manner of fluting doric columns, leaving arrises between the grooves instead of fillets, has been retained in modern practice as one of the characteristics of the order. in the greek-doric, every detail is marked by its breadth or flatness, or by its sharpness. there are no curved moldings or surfaces except the epitz't/n'das (a term given to the upper- most member of the corona) and the echinus, the latter being almost flat on its under side and finished with a sharp turn‘against the abacus. the breadth and shallowness of the channels, and the flat curves in which they are formed, are therefore in perfect keeping with the style, as are also the sharp arrises between the flutings, which are expres- sive of a severe simplicity. the horizontal rings, or annu- ll'ts—mere grooves cut around the neck of the column to form lines of separation between the capital and the shaft—are again expressive of the most extreme simplicity, and are in direct contrast to the projecting astragal, or convex molding, of the doric capital as modified by'the romans. historic ornament. § the echinus is a simple convex molding, and, from its shape, is often called a thumb melding. its form is sug- gestive of strength, as it expands to connect the dimin- ished upper end of the column with the overhanging abacus. . doric entabluture.—the entablature of the doric order is, like the column, the embodiment of'dignitfy and simplicity. its lowest division, the arc/zitrave' d, is a plain beam, whose height, including the taania, or fillet, is a trifle less than the upper diameter of the column. the middle division, or frz'e’sz’ e, constitutes a very characteristic feature of the doric order, being invariably ornamented with its trlglyphs and metopes. the former of these consists of upright blocks about one-half the width of the mean diam- eter of the column, having their faces grooved with two v-shaped channels, and their edges chamfered off with two half channels, thus making three channels altogether, from which the ornament derives its name of triglyph, or three-channeled. a portion of the triglyph, called the filly], extends below the taenia f the architrave, and depending from it are six drops, or guttae, which repre- sent the heads of treenails or pins used in the early'wood construction. in regard to the arrangement of the triglyphs, one was placed over every column, and one or more over the space between each pair of columns, but always so spaced that the metopes, or spaces between the triglyphs, should be exactly square; in other words, the height of the triglyph was always equal to the distance between them. in the best greek work, there was only one triglyph between each pair of columns, and this arrangement is usually called monotrz'- glyp/n'c, or single-triglyphed intercolumniation. a peculi- arity of the greek-doric frieze was that the end triglyphs, instead of being, like the others, in the same axis, or cen- tral line, as the columns beneath, were placed quite up to the edge or outer angle of the frieze. this is accom- plished by making the extreme intercolumniation less by § historic ornament. one-half a triglyph than the intermediate ones, thereby imparting an expression of strength to the angles of the building. the triglyphs are thus seen to govern the spacing of the columns, and as the -- spacing or intercol- umniation governs the diameter, and the diameter gov- erns the height, etc., we see that nearly =— ~w~wl fl . a all the proportions of a doric temple , - ‘ "“: can be traced from the size of its tri- glyph. there is one exception to this, however, and that is the little choragic monument of thra- syllus, on the south slope of the acrop- olis, at athens. this monument has no i triglyphs, but a series of wreaths ornament the frieze in their stead. the guttaa are never- theless retained, but, instead of being grouped at intervals, they are continued across the lower side of the taenia unin- terruptedly, as shown in fig. . fig. . . the cornice.—the third and last division of the doric entablature, the cornice f, though extremely simple, is strongly characteristic and boldly marked. it is in height about two-thirds the height of the frieze, and it is divided into three principal parts, the wrona, with the mum/rs beneath it, and the alarms above it. the mutules are thin plates or tablets worked on the soflit, or under side, of the historic ornament. § corona, directly over each triglyph and each metope. with the former, they correspond in width, and their soflits, or under surfaces, are set with a rake, or slant, which makes them parallel with the_ line of the pediment. they repre- sent the under side of the wood roof beams that extended over the eaves in the earlier construction. three rows of guttz, or drops, somewhat conical in shape, ornament the soffits of the mutules, each row corresponding in number of drops with the guttae on the triglyphs beneath. the corona. is merely a boldly projecting fiat member, not much deeper than the abacus of the capital, and examples exist where it is even less. the uppermost member of the entablature, the epz'tz'z‘lz- idas, was sometimes a cymalz'um, or rum/y molding, con- vex below and concave above, or it was—as in this exam- ple—an echinus similar in profile to the echinus of the capital. the cornice is to the entablature what the capital is to the column, the crowning member of the composition, completing and ending it in a very artistic and pleasing manner. . the proportions of these architectural orders are measured in terms of the diameter of the column. thus, the diameter of the column in its thickest part is divided into two portions, called modules, and the proportions of the order are then measured as being so many modules high or wide. a module is then divided into subdivisions, called parts, for the convenience of smaller measurements. these terms are usually abbreviated to m for modules and p for parts, and are so designated on the drawing. for instance, in fig. , the height of the column from the stylo- bate t the architrave is shown to be modules (that is, } diameters) and the top step of the stylobate is shown to be % parts in height, while in the cornice f is shown parts; that is, % of one-half the diameter of the column. . the ionic order.—the ionic order is lighter and more delicate than the doric, being expressive of grace and § historic ornament. refinement rather than of grandeur and dignity. it was used by the greeks in temples dedicated to deities repre- senting the more worldly settlements, such as the temple fig. . of victory and the porch of the temple of athena polias, shown in fig. . ' although the capital is the distinguishing characteristic, every detail of the order differs entirely from the doric. besides having the addition of a base, the shaft is taller and of more slender proportions, and much less tapering. the example of the ionic order shown in fig. is taken from the porch of the temple of athena polias, and shows the order in the zenith of its perfection. the capital d is not only historic ornament. § i more complex, but also more irregular than the doric capital, . p— t— b__ r__._ __ m >—dji-—t_. _ ._____.r_ __/,,, >-.u fp— ‘ m # ," _ _ .. ww, . v \‘ou‘mu xii/‘ x'l-u'c’ /-; v a fig. . as it has two faces, or fronts, parallel to the architrave above it, one of which is shown at d, and two narrower bolster § historic ornament. ] sides beneath the architrave, of which one is shown in fig. . this irregularity is considered by many a defect, which can be obviated only by turning the volutes diago- nally, as in some roman and modern examples, or by curving concavely the faces of the capital, instead of making them planes, thereby obtain- ing four equal faces. ionic capital, as used in the erech- theum and in the temple of nike however, the fig. . apteros, or \vingless victory, on the acropolis at athens, suits its position as well, and is as perfect an architectural feature as is the doric order in the parthenon. the only objection to the ionic capital is that in the end columns of a portico it exhibits an offensive irregularity, fig. . because, on the return side of the building, the bolster or side of the capital shows itself beneath the face of the architrave; yet even this is of no great consequence, unless the colonnade is continued down the sides of the building, and the capitals at the extremities present their bolster sides to the observer, while the intermediate ones show the voluted face. the greeks, with their usual inventive ingenuity, gave the capital at the angle two adjoining 'voluted faces, so that it should agree with the other columns both on the front and on the flank of the building. this was accomplished by placing the volute at the angle diagonally, so as to obtain there two voluted surfaces placed immediately back to back, as shown in fig. , which is an angle capital from an ionic temple historic ornament. § on the ilissus river, near athens. at a in the elevation (a) is the angle where the volutes are turned back to back, shown at b in the plan (b), and in fig. is shown a view of these two volutes as they would appear looking directly at the corner. we therefore have two volutes and two bolsters, as in any ionic capital; but the volutes are on two adjacent sides c, d, fig. ( ), while the bolsters are on the two opposite adjacent sides , a voluted face was thus kept to the outside on both sides of a corner, and the columns could be continued entirely around the cella. the ionic order possesses a base that differs in outline and moldings according to the locality where the example is found. the best examples existed in attica—the state of which athens was the capital—and the most artistic base, and the one best adapted to the order is found here, and is known as the a the [ , shown at b in fig. . it consists of two heavy torus moldings, separated by a scotia molding and resting on a square plinth, or stylobate. the upper torus is sometimes carved with a guilloche ornament, as shown, or is left perfectly plain. . the shaft c of the column is grooved by tiurrztyfour flutes, each pair of flutes being separated by a fillet. these flutes extend from the apophyge, or swelling of the column shown at a on the base of the shaft, to the astragal, or fillet, around the neck. the neck is enriched with a carved honey_ suckle ornament, which is carried entirely around the column. above the neck is a fillet and bead, and above this is a small echinus, which is carved with an egg-and-dart ornament. resting upon this echinus is a small torus that separates the echinus from the cushion-like capital, the ends of which are terminated by the valulz’s. a number of bands are run across the face of the cushion and rolled up on each side. § historic ornament. the abacus is a flat slab whose molded edge is carved with an egg-and-dart ornament. the ionic entablature, as expressed in modules, is greater than that of the doric order; but in proportion to the length of the column, the ionic entablature is less than the doric. for example, the entablature of the parthenon is about % modules high, while the ionic entablature is about % modules high; but % modules of a column mod- ules high equal one-quarter the height of the column, while ;- modules of a column only modules high equal about one-third the height of the column, thereby making the ionic order lighter and more delicate than its dignified brother, the doric. - . the ionic architrave.—the ionic architrave does not differ materially from that of the doric. its average height is equal to the upper diameter of the column, and it is usually divided into three surfaces, or courses, called facz'as, which very slightly project one over the other. there are a few examples where the architrave is left plain, as in the doric order, and, in such cases, the moldings are not so heavy as in this example from the erechtheum. the ionic frieze, being devoid of triglyphs, and having no other char- acteristic member substituted for them, becomes a mere plain surface, interposed between the architrave and the cornice. this plainness may be relieved by carving thereon figures in bas-relief; but as sculpture of that kind does not belong to'the character of the entablature, it is never taken into account in describing the details of the order. the ' ionic cornice is a simple affair, especially in the athenian examples, being merely a corona, with a cyma rccta above it and some narrow bed moldings beneath it. the soffit of the corona is hollowed out as shown by the dot- ted ine, and the bed moldings above referred to are left when this soffit is so cut, and are here shown dotted under the corona. between the corona and the cyma are two small enriched moldings, a bead, and another echinus. - ' ' historic' ornament. § fig. . . the greek- corlnthian order.— the corinthian order is the lightest and most delicate of the three, but it is almost impos- sible to determine for what class of builders the greeks considered it best adapted, as there is but one perfect example left for us to judge at the present day, and that is the choragic monument of lysicrates, at athens, shown in fig, . like the ionic, the prin- cipal characteristic of the corinthian order is its capital—tall, bell- shaped, and richly foli- ated, as shown at c, fig. . as was said with regard to the entablature of the ionic order, the capital of the corinthian column is higher in proportion to ' the diameter of the column than is either the ionic or the doric; but, as the shaft is longer and more slen- der than either of the others, it is able to carry a higher capital. § historic ornament. . the corinthian capital has two rows of leaves, eight in the upper row, and sixteen in the lower row, so dis- e , . )”. m fig. . posed that, of the taller ones, composing the upper row, one comes in the center, beneath each face of the abacus, and the lower leaves alternate with the upper ones, coming both historic ornament. § between and under the stems of the latter, so that in the first, or lower, tier of leaves there is, in the middle of each face, a leaf between each two leaves of the upper row, and also aleaf under the stem of the central leaf above them. above these two rows is a third series of eight leaves, turned so as to support the small volutes, which in turn support the angles of the abacus. besides these outer volutes, which are invariably turned diagonally, as in the four-faced ionic capital, there are on each face of the capital two other smaller ones, termed caulz'rulz', which meet each other beneath a flower on the face of the abacus. the abacus itself is different in shape from that of either of the other two orders. in the doric, it is, as we have seen, merely a thick slab resting on the echinus beneath it, and left absolutely plain; in the ionic, also, it is square, but the sides are molded and sometimes carved, while the corinthian abacus is, strictly speaking, not even square, except in general form. true, it has four equal sides, but instead of being straight, they are deeply concave in plan, and the acute point that would be formed by the meeting of these concave sides is usually cut off straight, thus making the abacus an eight-sided figure, four of whose sides are short and straight, while the other four are long and curved. . the base a of the greek-corinthian column is of the attic type, almost the same as that of the ionic order; and the shaft b, like the ionic also, has twenty-four flutes separated by fillets, but these flutes and fillets terminate at the top very differently from the way they do in the ionic. here we have a row of leaf-like ends curling out from the column, with the fillets forming their central ribs. the edges of these leaves intersect in an angle, and this angle gradually flattens out until it disappears entirely in the surface of the flute. above these leaf-like ends, and below the lower row of leaves in the capital, is a groove, cut entirely around the column, to emphasize the starting point of the capital, and which is said to have originally served as a receptacle for a braided band of bronze laurel § ’ ’ historic ornament. \ leaves, contrasting beautifully with the white marble of the monument. ' the entablature is very similar to that of the ionic order, with the exception of the cornice, which is larger and some- what richer than the uppermost member of the order from the erechtheum. the architrave is divided into three facias, as in the previous order, but their surfaces are not perpen- dicular. on the contrary, the faces are battered back so that the three arrises, or edges, are perpendicular over one another, and the offsets are formed by the batter. the molding at the top of the architrave is a simple cyma reversa, rhsting on a bead and surmounted by a rather heavy fillet. the frieze is shown here with the carved figures in relief, as it appears in the original monument, although, as said before, this carving does not form a component part of the order itself. above this frieze is a small torus and an ovolo supporting the dentil course. these den-tils are small rectangular blocks, spaced about two-thirds their width apart, and, in all proba- bility, are the stone representations of projecting ceiling joists, which existed in an early system of wooden construction. above this dentil course is a cyma recta, supporting a cyma-reversa bed molding under the corona. the corona projects more in the corinthian than it does in the ionic order; and the crowning member, instead of being a cyma, as in the previous order, consists of a series of antty‘inz sup- ported upon a serrated band, which is separated from the corona by a small echinus. - this completes the general description of the greek orders, a description that has been here given somewhat in detail, in order that the student may fully comprehend the liberties that were taken with these orders when the romans converted them to their own uses. th'e roman ommns. . the five orders of architecture, according to the italian architect and writer, vignola, will now be analyzed and described, and the attention of the student is called historic ornament. §~l § historic ornament. particularly to the unrefining influence of the romans expressed in their interpretation of the greek art forms. the romans were not an imaginative race, and had few original ideas in architecture. their early works were copied from the etruscans, and their later efforts were bor- rowed from the greeks. in nothing is this fact more evident than in the first of the five roman orders, namely, the t us- can, fig. . ~ . the tuscan order is but a modified form of the greek-doric, or, perhaps, more strictly speaking, it is an undeveloped form of the roman-doric. it takes its name from the etruscan people, who are supposed to be its orig- inators, though it is not improbable that the etruscans received their ideas from the same source as did the greek- dorians, both nations having emigrated from asia about the same time. one thing is certainly true, the tuscan column and entablature bear a closer resemblance to the proportions of the greek-doric than they do to the roman-dorie, which was admitted to be more or less copied from it; and the roman-doric resembles more the tuscan column and entab- lature than it does the greek order, whose name it bears. hence, we see that the tuscan is a sort of connecting link between the greek and the roman orders. it contains many greek details that the roman-doric does not, while, on the other hand, the roman-doric possesses many tuscan fea- tures unheard of in the greek. the characteristics of the order are its crqdcness and p/az'mzcsr, combined withits heavy moldings and lack of refinement in outline. it has, like all other roman orders, a regularly proportioned and molded pcdcstal b, which, though not a specific part of the order i itself, is generally drawn with it when the order is shown alone. . the pedestal is simply a square block b, with an apophyge, or escape to the fillet, resting on the plinth a at the bottom, and with a cyma reversa and a fillet at the top. upon this stands the base of the column i), which consists of o historic ornament. § a torus and a fillet resting upon a square plinth. the capi- tal f is in some respects similar to the doric, but lacks both the refinement of the greek-doric and the delicacy of the roman. it consists of an abacus, ovolo, and necking. the abacus is square in plan similar to the greek-doric, and is composed of a fillet resting upon a plain facia that has an apophyge, or curved escape to the fillet. the ovolo is a plain molding, often referred to as a quarter round, as its section is exactly a quarter of a" circle. ' the entablature is subdivided into an architrave g, a frieze h, and a cornice i, in proportions nearer to the greek-doric than is the roman order of that name. but the triglyphs and mutules so characteristic of the doric order are omitted entirely, while the moldings are large and heavy and out of proportion to the surfaces they are intended to ornament. the shaft of the tuscan column is never flutcd, and no carri- ing or enrichment of its moldings or surfaces is er'e'rpracticcd. . comparison of greek and roman orders.— before making a comparison of the greek and roman orders, let us first consider some of the conditions that made alter- ation necessary, before the art creations of the greeks could be adopted by the roman builders. the distinguishing characteristic of all roman architecture is the persistent use of the arch. the greeks spanned their openings with lintels—simple stone beams laid across from one column to another—and the width of the openings they could thus span was limited by the length of the stones they could conveniently quarry. but, by means of the arch, the romans could span 'any width desirable; but the pressure of 'the arch at the abutments was in the character of a hori- zontal thrust, which would overthrow any ordinary column, and especially such columns as were used by the greeks, laid up in several courses and devoid of mortar or cement. heavy masonry piers laid up in strong mortar with securely bonded courses, became necessary, therefore, to withstand this thrust, and the romans, having no structural use for the greek orders, applied them as ornament to their masonry § historic ornament. ' abutments. t ': is a wry impartant point and should [) remembered. the orders, thus backed up by heavy piers, did not require that appearance of sturdy independence that the greeks instilled into their supports, and they were consequently drawn out longer and thinner, and embellished with much carving and enrichment, as though endeavoring to attract the attention to their false beauty, while the piers and arches did the real mechanical work of holding up the building. this will, perhaps, be more clearly understood by refer-- ring to fig. , which is a portion of the facade of the thea- ter marcellus, at rome. the arches resting on the piers support all the mason work above them, while the col- . umns and the entablatures are applied to the structure sim- ply as ornament. strip these columns oif, and the building will stand as well as with them, but in appearance it will be simply a structural edifice, entirely utilitarian, and in no way esthetic. greek designers made their architecture beautiful by orna- menting the construction itself —remove the column, or en- tablature, and you. remove the essentials of the structure— but the romans designed the structure entirely apart from the ornament, and the latter might easily be removed with- out injury to the strength of the fabric. fig. . . description of the roman-dorie olden—the doric column, as used by the greeks, was from five to seven diameters in length, and the bottom of the shaft, being of the greatest diameter, it required no base to stand on, and g historic ornam en t. w”. h l | l l l flt]. . § historic ornament. was beautiful in its simplicity. the doric of the romans, as shown in fig. , was, on the contrary, eight or more diameters in height, and the bottom of its shaft was so small in proportion, that a regular molded base became necessary to give it an appearance of stability. there are instances where the column was used without a base, and the first story of the theater marcellus, at rome, fig. , is a most excellent example of the struggle to apply the tuscan details to the greek form. the lower order of the theater marcellus'presents the tuscan entablature with triglyphs in the frieze and guttae under the teenia, while the mutules are omitted entirely, and a row of dentils and bed moldings is inserted under the soflit of the corona. it will also be observed that in this case the column is not fluted, and stands upon the stylobate or plinth with- out a base, while the capital is molded after the tuscan model. ' . in the typical roman-doric, fig. , the pedestal is higher in proportion to its width than the tuscan, and its base exhibits more moldings than does the latter. the addition of a subplinth serves to raise the die b above the ground line without producing too broad a band under the base. the cornice moldings of the pedestal are much like the members of the tuscan entablature, and show another point of resemblance between these two orders. the base of the column d is almost identical with that of the tuscan order, with the slight addition of a bead molding between the torus and the fillet. the column is fluted with shallow grooves that meet in an arris, as in the greek order, but, unlike the latter, they die out or terminate below the line ad, which marks the apophyge of the shaft at the base. the capital f of the column is decidedly more tuscan than greek. it is separated from the shaft by a projecting fillet and bead, which in this position is called an astragal. instead of the annulets beneath the echinus, as in the greek capital, we have simply three projecting fillets, and the echinus is rounded out until it becomes in section a mere historic ornament. § quarter circle. the abacus is square, but has a crowning _ _member, and it has panels sunk in the corners of its sofiit, as shown by the dotted lines. . doric entablature.—there are, in fact, two dis- tinct systems of grouping the members of the roman-doric entablature: one, as in the greek, with mutules in the frieze, and the other—an entirely roman invention—with a course of dentils under the corona. the mutular doric is the order shown in the drawing plate; and, as will be at once observed, its entablature bears but a slight resemblance to the greek model. the archi- trave g is divided into two facias, the upper one projecting slightly over the lower one, somewhat in the manner of the greek-ionic. the triglyphs of the frieze h are always cen- tered over the axes of the columns, and, consequently, the metopes, which were always square in the greek order, are often oblong in the roman, with the longer axis set either vertically or horizontally. the mutules, which in the cornice of the parthenon were set over each triglyph and metope, existed over the tri- glyphs only in the roman-doric structures, and the soflit of 'the corona between them was paneled as shown by the dotted lines. the cornice i is lighter and more delicate than in the tuscan order, and its epitithidas is a cyma recta instead of an echinus. - . roman-ionic orders—the result of the roman- izing of the ionic order is shown in fig. , and is scarcely more successful than the doric. the romans never seemed to understand the possibilities of the order from the erech- theum, and, as a consequence, only three accredited exam- ples of the-roman-ionic column are known in rome today. these are the temple of 'fortuna virilis, the temple of con- cord, and the second story of the theater marcellus. the first of these is by far the best, its volutes retaining much of the greek character, while the last is the simplest and § historic ornament. _ plainest, and also the smallest in its ""l proportions; but the second is remark- able for its ugliness in general, and the inar- tistic arrangement of its volutes in partic- ular, which spring out diagonally so as to pre- sent four equal and sim- ilar faces. the example shown in fig. is taken prin- pally from the first of those just mentioned, with only such altera- tions as are necessary to bring it down to a gener- al type. in it we find the pedestal slightly longer in the die than was the doric, while the cor- nice cand base a of the _ pedestal are more richly b a molded than in either of the previous orders. the base d of the column, however, is of the famil- iar attic type that has already been described in connection with the greek-ionic order, and exhibits the first point of strong resemblance to the greek ancestor. the shaft of the column is nearly of the same historic ornament. § height as the greek; and, in many examples, is grooved by twenty-four flutes separated by fillets, though in this exam- ple there are but twenty. by a strange perversity, however, when we arrive at the capital, we meet a striking difference from the athenian order. in the columns of the portico of the erechtheum, we have a mrkmg, between the echinus of the capital and the astragal of the column; but in the roman-ionic, the flutes of the shaft extend almost to the eyes of the volutes. in their doric order the romans inserted a necking above, which did not exist in the greek order and must have been borrowed from the attic-ionic, or, possibly, from the tus- can; but when they adopted the ionic order, they seem to have taken especial pains to omit the detail that, according to previous appearances, they particularly admired. for some reason, they omitted this necking, and the roman- ionic capital has a flat, crushed appearance in consequence, as shown. the roman-ionic volute contains but one band, while that of the greeks possessed three, though there are instances where a single band was coiled in the i capital of the greek order, as in the temple on the ilissus river, fig. . but the ionic i order reached the ze- nith of its perfection {if— ?; in the erechtheum, and it is with the details of that building we must compare any subsequent ionic constructions. the architrave g and frieze h of the roman order are very similar to those of the greek, but between the frieze if and corona of i is inserted a row of dentils with upper and lower bcd moldings, which cast a serrated shadow and emphasize the projection of the corona. ' ' !!! ._ in ! u. iiiununil § historic ornament. . the ionic capital above referred to in the temple of concord is illustrated in fig. . it is shown here, not on account of its architectural beauty, for it has none, but because in certain classes of early .renaissance work, this style of cap was redesigned by palladio and used in com- binations where its defects were not so glaring. the prin- ciple on which this cap is designed is that the volutes a are growing out and curling over the edge of the contracted echinus , while the whole is covered with an eight-sided abacus , strongly resembling the corinthian. the space under the abacus and between the volutcs is filled with a carved rosette, or, in a few instances, with an animal's head. . roman-corinthian rder.—\ve now come to the corinthian, which we may consider a typical roman order. there, is but one example of richly foliated capitals in all greek art, and the modern corinthian order, though prob- ably taken from it, bears but a general resemblance to its prototype. we have gone into the details of the greek- corinthian capital, and the roman style will only be dwelt upon where it contrasts with the details of the greek. the roman-corinthian capital, shown at f, fig. , has two rows of leaves, eight in each row, so disposed that of the taller ones composing the upper row, one comes in the mid- dle, beneath each face of the abacus, and the lower leaves alternate with the upper ones, coming between the stems of the latter; so that, in the first, or lower tier of leaves, there is in the middle of each face, a space between two leaves occupied by the stem of the central leaf above them. . fig. is not taken from any particular edifice, but is compiled from a number of different structures, in order to get a general type of the order. the shaft here is fluted with twenty-four flutes, though in many of the best examples it is not fluted at all. the portico of the pantheon possesses one of the handsomest examples of the corinthian order in historic ornament. § rome, but the granite columns are left unfluted, and their surfaces are highly polished, to com- pensate for the omission. the base of the corinthian column varies somewhat in dif- ferent examples, but _is most frequently an en- riched variation of the greek-attic. it is scarce- ly necessary to comment on the pedestal of either the corinthian or com- posite orders, as there is no change from the ped- estal of the previously described orders, except an elongation of the die kg and an increase of the e number of the moldings \ that ornament its top c " c_ and base a. the same may be said of the base d e of the column, the only i change from the previous . orders being 'an increase l___ of the members between the two torus moldings. t the shaft e of the col- ~ _ umn is but slightly longer 'than in the ionic order, .t_ but the increase in the height of the capital makes the entire column ten diameters high. ,the entablature, however, is very different from any we have yet described. the architrave g is divided into three “iii fig. . § historic ornament. horizontal bands, or facias, as was the ionic, but instead of a plain projection of one facia beyond the other, they are separated by a number of different small mold- ings, which, in nearly every instance, were carved and enriched al- most to excess. the frieze h is here shown as plain, but the ma- jority of examples show it carved in high re- lief. the cornice i exhibits the greatest alteration from the pre- vious orders that we have yet seen. a row of dentils are support- ed by a cyma reversa immediately above the " " ' frieze, similar to the ionic arrangement; but - immediately above this we have a heavy ovolo supporting a row, of course, of modz'llz'ous. f m/ p ———f——"- elli/ p. e d y-jlj -io—- mjja—- -- -—q—/mijp.- c . a modilllon is the projecting bracket supporting the corona of the corinthian en- tablature. these brack- ets possess a volute somewhat similar to that of the ionic capi- tal, but curved in the opposite direction. a fm. . historic ornament. § . composite order.—between the corinthian and composite orders there is very little difference except in the size of the volutes, and, with the exception of the cap- ital of the column, there is scarcely any difference in the proportions of their parts. fig. shows the general form of this essentially roman composition, but omitting entirely the ornamentation of the frieze and moldings, which is as much a part of this order as the triglyphs are of the doric. ornamentation, as a rule, forms no part of the order that it enriches, and, consequently, should not be considered a part of the structure of the order, but the composite order was invented by the romans for no other purpose than to carry heavy ornamentation; in fact, it was the excessive and extravagant ornamentation of the corinthian order that caused the composite to spring into existence, and our example is, therefore, not com- plete until it receives such ornamentation as may be appropriate to its purpose. the general form is here given, and the application of ornament will be discussed later, in its proper place. the pedestal of the composite order is almost identical with that of the corinthian, there being but a few slight changes in the moldings of its base and its cap, while the die is a trifle longer. the base, shaft, and capital of the column are the same- height as the corinthian, and with the exception of the capital are almost the same in design. the architrave, frieze, and cornice have the same rela- tive proportions as in the previous order, but are treated somewhat more elaborately in the subdivisions of their parts. the composite capital is a combination of the cor- inthian and the ionic capital from the roman temple of concord, heretofore referred to. it is not an artistic combination, but its broad, strong volutes give an unus- ual surface on which to carve florid ornament, and, as such, it suited exactly the later-day admirers of every- thing strictly roman. it suits its place in modern art very well, when in proper handling, but the renaissance § historic ornament. architects were conspicuous in italy by the interior appli- cation of the composite order in every spot where it did not belong. . the 'roman acanthus.—the acanthus leaves under the roman modillions and those around the bells of the corinthian capitals are placed, one before the other, stifily and inartistically; they are not even bound together by the necking at the top of the shaft, but appear to have been cut off to rest directly upon it. it will be remembered that in the capital of the egyptian column, where the stems of the flowers are arranged around the bell, they appear to be continued through the necking of the column, and at the same time express a beauty and a truth. the great facility that the roman system of decoration affords for the application of this acanthus ornament to any form and in any direction, is the lamentable cause of the invasion of this ornament into most modern work. its design requires little thought and is so easily manufac- tured that it has encouraged designers in an indolent neg- lect of one of their especial provinces—that of invention. in the use of the acanthus leaf, the romans showed but little art. they received it from the greeks most beauti- fully conventionalized, and though they went nearer to the general outline of the leaf, they exaggerated the surface decoration. the greeks confined themselves to expressing the principles of the foliation of the leaf, and bestowed great care in the delicate undulations of its surface. . character of roman ornament.—as said here- tofore, roman ornament consists essentially of one scroll growing out of another and encircling a flower or a group of leaves, as shown in fig. . which is a characteristic piece of roman ornament. this is the principle of greek ornament, and though the romans borrowed the principle, they omitted the greek refinement. historic ornament. § the most characteristic method of using the acanthus leaf in roman art can be seen in the roman concep- tion of the corinthian capital, fig. . the amount of design that can be obtained by working on this prin- ciple of roman orna- ment—of leaf within leaf and leaf over leaf -—is very limited, and it was not until the principle of one leaf growing out of an- other in a continuous line was abandoned, for the adoption of a continuous stem throwing off ornaments on either side, that the pure conventional ornament received any development. . painted decorations—the painted decorations of roman art are comparatively few; the style was some- what similar to what we see at pompeii—an adoption from the greek, executed in the hands of the roman artists. the coloring is hardly worth great consideration, .as it possessed nothing of an original character; and the stu- dent should bear in mind that all art forms of rome are borrowed forms. her construction she inherited from etruria, and combined it with the art obtained in greece. in fact, it might be said that there is no true roman style, that is to say, executed by romans themselves, for the roman was essentially a warrior and a politician, and his art works were designed by the subjugated greek and his structural works put into effect by descendants from the etruscans. the transition of greek ornament into the styles of europe was simply delayed by the conquest of greece § historic ornament. by rome, and, during the delay so caused, the style was degraded, and spread throughout the country in that condition. - rolianesque ornament. . . development of the romanesque style—in considering the romanesque style, it must be borne in mind that the roman empire covered almost the entire continent of europe, and that roman art had penetrated as far west as spain and as far north as england and the baltic sea. after the downfall of the western roman empire, the conquering races from the north attempted to carry out the roman style of building as they found it in different parts of the country, and the endeavor to apply these art forms under a new system of religion, and influenced by different conditions of government and living, together with the necessity of practicing a rigid economy in material, caused an alteration of the original roman style and brought about the style that we now consider romanesque. . the fall of the western roman empire, in a. d.,- therefore marked the beginning of a new architec- tural era throughout all europe (except possibly in the east- ern empire, with its capital at byzantium), and the so called dark ages that followed this event may be considered as a formative period of western civilization during which the barbaric conquerors of rome became gradually christian- ized and were subjected to the authority and educational influences of the church. under these conditions a new architectural style was developed, founded on the traditions of the earlier chris- tian builders, but modified in dilferent regions by local influences. the prevailing characteristics of the style were at first essentially roman, for rome soon recovered her antique prestige as the leading city of europe, and the roman monuments covering the soil of southern historic ornament. § europe were a constant object lesson to the builders at that time. . influence of the church.-—romanesque archi- tecture was distinctly ecclesiastical. civilization and culture emanated directly from the church, .and the requirements and discipline of the religious orders gave form to the builders’ art. corinthian columns, marble incrustations, splendid mosa- ics, etc. were not to be obtained in the forest lands of france and germany, and the priests caused to be erected with unskilled labor churches of stone, and the struggle with this structural problem underlies the entire system of roman- esque design. \ . system of building under roman domination. the romans, when they wished to erect grand monuments of public utility, could send to the spot, no matter how remote, an army of soldiers, and, by their tyrannical system of government, compel the very inhabitants of the locality to desist from all their employments and work for the emperor of rome. they thus achieved by a multitude of hands those prodigious results that today stand monuments not only of their enterprise but also of their despotism. had the builders of the middle ages desired to pursue this course, where would they have found the army of work- men? in countries not only without stone but without money to buy it, without beasts of burden to transport material if they could buy it, without even roads over which to travel, how could these people make any attempt to follow the course of their roman predecessors? bearing these facts in mind as we study romanesque ornament, we will readily see in the earlier examples an attempt to copy roman art—an attempt that failed as a duplication of an antique style, but was eminently successful in the development of a new style that was much more rational than the one back to which the middle-age builder had been looking. § historic ornament. . in fig. is shown the capital of a column, the moldings of which and the crude formations of whose leaves are easily traceable to the roman-corinthian order; fig. a i fic. . and the capital shown in fig. , though entirely different from that shown in fig. , also illustrates the influence of classic art and the corinthian order in the formation of the style at this period. more clearly, perhaps, than either of these is the base shown f . ‘ . fig. . in fig. , which dates back to the eleventh century. here the moldings are almost identical with those seen on the classic columns. in fig. is shown a base of later date, which exhibits a radical departure from the classic lines. historic ornament. § . the frieze shown in fig. is taken from an exam- ple in southern germany, dating back to the twelfth century. \ .iiiiiiiiil}|};,,nllr;l; , fig. . the treatment of the leaf forms there clearly shows a classic origin, but the boldness of the treatment shows an inclination § . historic ornament. to become independent of the traditions of the classic style, and in fig. the ornament, taken from a french church of the twelfth century, shows a decided freedom from the governing rules of classic design, although the, character of the curves and proportions of the surface covered is strongly suggestive of the greek anthemion. in fig. is shown a most independent example, where we have the main running stem and the branches from alternating sides, while the small pyramid forms cut in the main stem appear here and are characteristic of the romanesque period. i'llll' militia»i...........imtumntllllll»,“ ...illllllllli i. :i mm fig. . in fig. is shown an example of german twelfth-century art that shows the possible influence of celtic work. observe that, complicated as this design at first appears, it is really very simple in construction and contains only one leaf form arranged in two positions. the entire free flowing lines are then woven around these forms to produce a most satisfactory effect. . in repeating ornament and diaper patterns, fig. shows a simple arrangement of circles from the church of st. denis, at paris, dating back to the twelfth century, while historic ornament. § fig. shows a diaper pattern from the lincoln cathedral, - in- england, of the same period, showing a radical difference in style on account of the remote- ness from rome. in figs. and are shown two patterns taken from stained- glass windows, the former of ger- man design and the latter french. the simplicity of the design in each case is its distinguishing characteristic, and, though in ap- pearance somewhat complicated, a little study eliminates all “‘ . § historic ornament. complications, and shows the geometrical principle on which it is constructed to be of utmost simplicity. . origin of gothic and byzantine ornament.— from these few examples, with which the artists of the romanesque period decorated their structural details, we see that the application of romanesque forms was simple— simple from a necessity of economy, and simple on account of a freedom of mind devoid of any art traditions. the builder and designer of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries had no memories of rome or greece to follow, and no historical forms that had been handed down from genera- tion to generation, to copy which was almost required by law, and to depart from which would have been a sacrilege in the eyes of his country. the medieval builder attacked his problem with no other tools than his eye and his brain, and gradually developed the form of art that we call romanesque, and that culminated in two entirely new styles, both in construction and ornamentation—the got/tic in the west and the byzantine in the east. byzantine ornadient. . oriental influence.—in the east, around the city of byzantium, romanesque ornament was influenced by the art of assyria and persia. in fact, its entire character became tinged with an oriental spirit, and, in the course of the next three or four centuries, it developed into a new and entirely different style of architecture and art, known as byzantine. the old roman forms became obsolete and gave place to new forms, original, beautiful, and artistic. it will readily be understood that there would be a period of transition between the slowly developing romanesque and the finished byzantine style, and it is with such exam- ples of ornament as date from this period of transition that uncertainty as to their proper classification arises. it is more diflicult to distinguish between these styles, whose g historic ornament. .oa .o-h q. (q a . ' ..) fr, -fifitr, , t. , a talent. historic ornament. § exhausted by the prodigious expense. but the church was built, and is certainly one of the grandest architectural monuments the world has ever seen. the plan and con- struction of this edifice is no more remarkable than the scale and treatment of its interior decoration (see fig. ), and it stands to byzantine architecture as the parthenon stood to the greek. unfortunately it is now converted into a moham- medan mosque, and the severity of the mohammedan religion required that its beautiful interior decorations should be covered from sight by repeated applications of whitewash. however, we have been able to secure reproductions of some of these great ornaments so characteristic of the byzantine style. . examples of byzantine style.-—at ravenna, which was the seat of government of the eastern empire under justinian, the church of san vitale is also a fine example of the byzantine style, and at ravenna, byzantine art reached its height in this edifice. venice also felt largely the byzantine influence, and the church of st. mark, built in the eleventh century, is a monu- ment patterned largely after the plan and decoration of hagia sophia; and, extending as far south as sicily, we have the cathedral of monreale, near palermo, showing strong byzan- tine influences, but at the same time possessing many details that are so strongly character- istic of the romanesque style that it is difficult in many cases to classify them. . the capital shown in fig. is from one ot the columns in the first tier of . arches in the church of hagia sophia, at constantinople- the scrolls in the upper part of this column undoubtedly have their origin in the ionic order, and, though the entire capital is fig. . § historic ornament. decorated with the conventionalized acanthus leaf, observe how widely different it is from any roman model. here the block of the capital is sound and heavy, and at its bot- ' tom is a foliated ring that seems to bind it together, while the carved leafwork grows out of the top of the column and enters materially into the construction of the capi- tal itself. another byzantine capi~ tal, shown in fig. , is taken from another church in constantinople, built about the same time as hagia sophia, but less original in detail. here the heavy scrolls project from the angles of the capital very much in the same man- ner as the volutes in the temple of concord at rome, and the place usually occupied by the abacus is filled by a heavy semipyramidal form on which the ornament seems to be applied as a surface decoration more than a component part of the construction. the effect of this illustrates, however, a radical departure from the traditions that limitated the architectural designs in roman art; and even when we arrive at byzan- tine capitals of the eleventh century,as seen in st. mai k's, at venice, fig. , we can still observe the influence of roman art, but thoroughly subservient to the byzantine school of design. . in fig. , the volutes at fig, m, i the top of the eolumn, the shape of the capital 'as it swells out to the abacus, and the general character of the historic ornament. ur entire detail are strongly suggestive of its roman-corinthian .origin; but the strictly conventional treatment of the leaves, the character of the scroll around the abacus, and the bind- ing together of the ornament in ,ii e. i i i i i i | the construction show plainly the . n " influence of the work in the east. > r l ‘ ‘ ~.\_ ,. '\ | / \ fig. is another example of byzantine capital, from italy, and is even more freed from roman influence than that of the previous example. the long elliptical curves formed by the leaves, the sharp-pointed lobes, and the deep v indentations are all suggestive of f " its byzantine origin, while the little row of dentils so useless]; arranged around the top show the difficulty of producing any work in italy without some taint of classic spirit. . the running ornament is illustrated in fig. , which example is taken from the same church as fig. , where the leaf form is thoroughly conventional, and, though fig. . tending slightly toward a scroll, is governed by a continuous wavy line, from opposite sides of which the leaf forms branch. fig. is an example of geometrically arranged running ornament from hagia sophia. the main geometrical forms, as will be observed, are circles, but these circles are not formed complete in themselves, but result from the crossing § historic ornament. and intersection of two wavy lines precisely the same in general character as the wavy line that forms the governing element of fig. . instead of branching foliage from oppo- fro. . site sides of the lines, in the latter case, however, geometrical figures are arranged within, and foliated forms that have the cross of st. george for their guiding element are used to form prominent details of the design. ' ' ’", ' . l -, l\-.‘\v j / ' i t ,' v i 'i " ).‘ , y/ it ’ ~ a? j \_ / ‘\..~;;/\ i i l i é m.. ", ‘ *.ch "swims-. ?“- fig. . . going back again now to the church of st. mark, built in the eleventh century, we have a wall decoration historic ornament. § between two arches, shown in fig. . tracing out the outline of this running surface ornament, it will be observed that the same wavy line governs its principle and direction, as in the case of fig. ; but a close study will show that the branching of leaves from one side is accompanied by a branch from the opposite side, so near that the general feeling is of a scroll growing out of a scroll, somewhat after the order of classic art. above this ornament, however, the semi- circular ring is ornamented by geometrical devices within a governing outline, precisely similar to that seen at’hagia sophia, fig. . in all these examples, the student will observe that the character of the leaf is particularly uniform, that it is in the principle of the decoration that we find the greatest variation, and that the variation in this character only amounts to a greater or lesser display of oriental or classic influence. . examples of byzantine art found in greece are usually purer than any found in italy, as roman art and influence never secured a thoroughly characteristic foothold in the conquered country. byzantine art was built on greek § historic ornament, art in the first place, and examples of it on greek soil are usually of excellent character. besides this, greek examples have not been mutilated by mohammedan invasion to the extent that we find them in other eastern countries, and the color treatment and contrast can be best studied there. . ceiling decoration. fig. shows an example of ceiling decoration from the church of st. george at thessa- lonica. the circular ornament within the border was exe- cuted in red on a blue ground, though the hollow-sided square in the center of it was gold, as were also the triangles at the four corners. the peculiar outline of the device adja- _ cent to the four sides of the interior rectangle is suggestive of arabian origin, and is exceedinglyingeniousinits method of preserving symmetry and preventing awkward repetition. the border around this was executed entirely in gold on a blue ground, with the exception of the extreme outside line, which was red. . wall decomtlon.—fig. is an example of wall fig. . decoration from the same edifice, the rectangles and circles containing the leaves and crosses, all being worked with a historic ornament. plain gold round, while the figures and half of the smaller crosses were green and the outlines of the larger crosses and the remaining smaller crosses were red. the effect is very rich, and the arrangement of the rectangles and smaller circles shows a knowledge of surface division that is well carried into effect. the student's attention is particularly called to the fact that the shape of the groundwork between the rectangles is also crucial, and that every effort is made to bring that symbolic detail into prominent display. . in giving examples of byzantine ornament, nothing could be more characteristic than the stone panels herewith illustrated. the style of the ornament itself, the character of the carving, and the development of the geometrical pat- tern are all details that. are shown here in a most character- istic byzantine form. ’ ' >\‘ ‘_ . e; ~~ \m ‘ m ‘ r ,. ' _. 'g‘g‘,‘;l'§ <>g!ft ., , . g._ ')sz ‘ j p j _ ‘ " { ' l? p'za'epalffi) ‘ " i ! ?. . v. ' ' .. ~ l . ,‘\ _l.:‘ i w, l)! *‘\_‘¢l .‘,( ,} _. ‘ lit! ‘ i _ v.'. ‘ i}, . _ , § ‘ ' — ,nw ‘ ‘; ‘.‘;e ’x. . ,f‘! 'i q . _. i g } at?! j “fl ‘ \ ')? ’ “. " ,", i " “ugymil‘ggfi; ‘ v ‘ w- r; ' a '. _-l'\" - k , {in} " ",! _, . {iii/q .“ a. ra-' fig. . . the pierced screen shown in fig. is from ravenna, and illustrates the geometrical pattern based on an arrangement of circles (somewhat after the style of the celtic ornament), in which is carved the typical byzantine § historic ornament. leaf. the cross outlined in the center was emphasized in the original by a plating of gold, and the spaces around the foliage were filled with birds whose peculiar modeling and conventional outline is characteristic of the byzantine style. another characteristic of the style, shown clearly in this illustration, is the sharp angular cutting of the leaves, the deep circular and elliptical openings between the lobes of two adjacent leaves, and the tendency of the whole panel to appear in high relief on a dark ground rather than to be pierced through entirely. in fig. is shown another screen of the same character, where the interlaced bands that form the geometrical outline p of the foliated ornament were originally gilded, and the leaf forms carved between them are similar to those in fig. . . fig. , however, shows a trend in a different direc- tion. here the openings in the screen are larger, the exterior portion of it being outlined with a design undoubtedly derived from the grecian fret, while in the center a large latin cross divides the panel into four smaller rectangles, historic ornament. § each filled with a particular device symbolic of christianity and characteristic of the byzantine style. observe also the running foliage around this panel, and its branching leaves and fruit, alternately from opposite sides, and note the differ- fig. ence between this style of treating foliage and that of the roman and greek artists, where continuous foliage was accomplished by growing one spray or stem out of a calyx or cup from which a scroll emanated. . the capital of the column shown in fig. is also from ravenna, and the peculiar looking birds on the upper part, as well as the sharply indented foliage, are character- istic of this style. here, also, is seen that same geometrical pattern as the governing outline to which we called atten- tion in fig. , and also the wandering-vine border line, § historic ornament. throwing off its leaves on alternate sides in a similar manner to the outline in fig. . that the capital of the column is cut in full relief is clearly shown by the fact that the light shines through the screen work on to the stone interior, as may be seen. this style of capital will be found throughout northern italy where any example of byzantine style exists. the dark portions _ of it were originally gilded, and inust certainly have pre- sented a most remarkable effect. . turning to st. mark's, at venice, fig. , we find a frieze such as shown in fig. , the lines of which are based on identically the same motives as the screens we historic ornament. g “ . i. w v n a r”. ll § historic ornament. have already studied; but the carving, though in high relief, does not pierce the screen, and the border of the panel, as well as the treatment of the foliage within the panel, shows a highly developed byzantine feeling. observe, however, . - v w).“wafwswmwé. . \ifil‘fn’l‘df'fl‘fhyy'ingqworkfiwa ‘ ‘-.j ~\il..l|\gl-iili|l-i i. .n-lnlu-n “ ' .,'f ‘ \£‘\lf’l , ~ i w ‘. ': \ i ' } a _ , r . a ~";r[r"yvy\;;" / ) ' ' r '“ /-'/.' /j n; " "qr-“i )-,-\.-l,_._' ,a_,,\_, ,. ‘mmaa*ma¢w .v—i. ).: - ‘/.~'.\'/.~.\"anal/ngagus. an.svs.. .~.\ m.\'t.t..\‘ ‘ l (..., . ir“ ~\‘- .\ \‘\_q~_\- \ .~_.uu~.~.. _ ' a' \§ \,_\;-_\'-_g~_\-;\~‘_\,._\ t ( " a“. ‘ i . . : { / al =vf' i a“) 'v, ‘ ‘i iia li- / \zq‘ygg . $ ' ; /(?/\/// /(i ?//@fl ' w “éi; : “*""f"j ‘ _ fig. . the influence of its proximity to rome on the treatment of the scroll forms. in the central part of the panel we do_ not have the running vine, with its leaves branching from each side, but a partly controlled tendency to grow one § historic ornament. strong byzantine effect that the classic taint is fairly obliterated. . iiigenuity of byzantine ornament—the geo- metrical arrangements in byzantine ornament are exceed- ingly ingenious, and especially remarkable in mosaic work, flo. . the monotony of which they destroy by well planned and complicated constructions based usually upon a variation of the straight line and the right angle. in fig. is shown one of the doorways in the cathedral of monreale, near palermo, around which mosaic patterns are inlaid in the jambs and also in the flanking walls. the pattern of this mosaic is typical of examples of that art in the byzantine style, as the byzantine mosaics can nearly always be distinguished from the roman mosaics by the historic ornament. § fact that the geometrical construction forms an integral part of the design. there is one style of this mosaic ornament that is also typical of the romanesque period, particularly fig. . this consists of a geometrical arrangement of shaped pieces of glass in a complicated series of diagonal lines, the directions of which are defined and terminated by means of pieces in different colors. in italy. lozenge § historic ornament. the examples of this work in central italy are much simpler than those of the southern provinces of sicily, where the influences of saracenic art are very much felt; and this mosaic work, as observed in the southern provinces, is very difficult to classify positively, either in the romanesque or the byzantine style. historic ornament. § . in fig. are shown some clustered columns from the cathedral of monreale. one group of four columns is richly carved with the interlaced ornament so familiar in the examples of byzantine art, while the adjacent columns, inlaid with zigzag lines of mosaic, are more suggestive of roman- esque art, and the capitals and bases of both sets of columns are more in accordance with the romanesque idea than with the byzantine. this, however, may be largely accounted for when we consider that both styles were merged together in sicily at about the close of the twelfth century, and the examples in figs. and are here given in order that the similarity of styles may be carefully studied. . sculpture in byzantine art.—pure byzantine ornament is distinguished by broad-toothed and acute- pointed leaves, which in sculpture are beveled at the edge and are deeply chiseled throughout and drilled with deep holes at the springings of the teeth. the running foliage is generally thin and continuous. the ground, whether in mosaic or painted work, is almost universally gold. thin interlaced patterns are usually preferred to geometrical designs, and the introduction of animal or other figures is very limited, especially in sculpture, and in painted work is confined principally to holy subjects in a stiff conventional style, exhibiting little variety of feeling. in fact, in byzan- tine art, sculpture is a very secondary importance. . sculpture in romanesque art.—romanesque ornament, on the other hand, depended mostly on sculpture for its effect. it is rich in light and shade, deep cuttings and massive projections, and a great intermixture of figure subjects of every kind with foliage and conventional orna- ment. the place filled by mosaic work in the byzantine art, in the romanesque is supplied generally by paint. in colored ornament, animals are as freely introduced as in sculpture, and the ground no longer confined to gold, but composed of blue, red, or green. in other respects, how- ever, the two styles are very much alike. § historic ornament. asiatic ornaa'ien t. . characteristics of the people.—before studying the style of the ornament of this section of the eastern hemisphere, let us consider how different are the character- istics of this people from the european nations whose ornament we have so far analyzed. oriental people are traditionally immobile in character and unprogressive in their methods of business and manufacture. the processes of weaving, carving, and other practices of art design are trans- mitted carefully and faithfully in the oriental nations from generation to generation, and it is therefore practically impossible to assign a precise date to any one production, so similar are the designs. the study of oriental art is there- fore freed from any minute chronological examination, and the student is able to consider the subject in a broad sense, _ considering only primary and original styles that predomi- nate over lesser divisions and personal modifications. these styles can be divided into three general groups: ( ) c/n'nese and japanrsc, indian, and arabian. chinese and japanese ornalient, . the chinese are a nation of great antiquity, and we can discover no detail of art training that they have ever given to or received from any other civilization. this nation has been ever satisfied with itself, and this lack of progression and consequent isolation have given it an originality of character devoid of any detail that we find of the art works of other nations, unless we except those general geometrical formations that instinct seems to have implanted uniformly in the minds of every known race. . primitiveness of chinese rnament.—chinese ornament does not seem to have gone beyond the very earliest stages of design that we find among the most prim- itive people. they are even behind the new zealander in historic ornament. their theory of applied art, and are plodding along in the creation of fresh designs at a fixed point that is neither pro- gression nor retrogression. like all oriental nations, they possess a wonderful faculty of color harmony, but they have never expressed an appreciation of pure form—a condition that must necessarily be arrived at by a subtle process and result from highly endowed natural instincts, or from the development of primitive ideas through successive gen- erations of artists, each improving on the work of its predecessor. in their decorative and woven patterns, the chinese pos- sess only just such talent as might be expected of a most primitive people. their most successful efforts are those in which a geometrical pattern forms the basis of a design, and even in these they depart from patterns formed by the inter- section of equal lines, and seem to have a very imperfect idea of the distribution of space. ' their taste for color, which amounts almost to an instinct, enables them in some measure to balance form, but in designs deprived of color they seem to be almost helples's. the chinese are certainly colorists, and are able to balance with equal success both the fullest tones of color and the most delicate shades. they are not only successful in the use of _ the primary colors, but also in the secondaries and tertiaries, and they are particularly deft in their management of the lighter shades of pure color, such as pink, light blue, pale green, etc. . lack of idealism in chinese ornament.-in their printed paper hangings, the treatment of both figures and landscape and of ornament is so conventional that, no matter how inartistic we may consider it, we feel that it is within the bounds of decoration. in all cases, their instinct thus rcstrains them within the true limit, and although the arrangement is generally unnatural and inartistic, they never by shades or shadows violate consistency, as is repeatedly done in work at the present day. in their floral patterns, they always observed natural laws § historic ornament. of radiation from the parent stem, and tangential curvature. it could not very well be otherwise with a people like the chinese, whose strongest peculiarity is their fidelity in copy- ing, and hence we must infer that they are close observers of nature. it is the taste to idealize on this close observa- tion that is wanting. on the whole, chinese ornament is a very faithful expression of the nature of this peculiar people. its characteristic feature is oddness. we cannot call it capricious, for caprice is a playful wandering of a lively imagination; but the chinese imagination is disorderly, and all their works are wanting in the highest grace of art, namely, idealism. . dearth of chinese architecture.—-the extreme fancifulness of chinese ornamental compositions, and the lack of order or method in them, is not surprising when we take into consideration the fact that the chinese have never developed anything worthy of the name of architecture in the true sense of the word. they have no original form of construction that would be likely to give rise to a system of ornament in which even the most insignificant designs have been known to assume character and even grandeur, as is so well exemplified in egyptian style. . the absence of a national architecture renders the character and genius of the chinese easily understood. to this peopie, that seems to occupy itself with naught but details in everything, the conception of a monumental building is entirely beyond comprehension. certainly, this circumstance is largely responsible for the condition of the chinese today and the rudimentary character of their designs. the first element of beauty in the chinese school of art is variety, and in their foliated designs we find leaves following one after another bearing not the slightest resemblance to one another. one panel of a screen painted with aland- scape will be set beside another ornamented with metallic arabesques. the use of straight lines and right angles is historic ornament. § either studiously avoided or so disguised that they will be vague or misunderstood. . chinese colorlng.—that the chinese imagination is of adisorderly character is shown in some of their curiously shaped forms; these are so entirely different from those with which we are more familiar, and so completely destitute of the elements that cause an impression of grandeur, that the interest in their designs is with difficulty maintained. the chinese are apparently ignorant of the simplest laws of perspective, and seem in no way to comprehend the effect of light and shade. notwithstanding this inferiority, however, the coloring of their ornament is so rich, and their imagina- tion is so wild and irregular, that they make a varied and charming use of their ornament in particular applications, such as ceramics, incrustations, and woven fabrics. . their productions are models of color harmony, and are in some respects superior to the works of other nations. the very defects in their designs form sources of some of the good qualities that accompany them, and the capricious activity of their minds inclines them to make an ornament of every- thing, whether it be a cloud, wave, shell, rock, or form from the animal world. the bright-colored butterfly flitting among flowers and the flaming thunderbolt bursting from the heavens are of equal importance to the chinese artist when applied to a surface as ornament. to these rich and varied resources may be added a limited number of time-honored figures that, to a certain extent, have symbolical significance. lve are all familiar with the chinese dragons—those monsters with frightful heads, formidable looking teeth, and fearful claws—certain funny looking dogs with claws, sharp teeth, and curling mains somewhat resembling the lion, grotesque birds, and the mandarin duck, all of which are conspicuous in chinese decoration. . adherence to standard forms.—a peculiarchar- acteristic of this art is that, though it appears in itself so § historic ornament. capricious, its execution expresses such faithfulness of trans- mission in the representation of things from generation to generation that the lapse of hundreds of years has not caused the slightest modification of one of these standard ornaments. this may be due to the effect of the imitative instinct of this isolated nation that, so advanced in some points and so primitive in others, is always consistent in itself. it is possible, however, that this fidelity in the observance of the form and coloring of some preceding work is due to some mysterious rules—some sort of ritual perpetuated through various ages. ancient laws and customs established certain rules governing the color of the robes and vestments of the imperial court, according to different dynasties; once it was white, afterwards green, and the tai tasig dynasty, now reigning in china, dresses in yellow. chinese art is a mixture of ideal and imitative elements, the latter being used in the mest conventional manner, the coloring of which is also conventional and not in the least subject to any imitation of nature. - . japanese art, though borrowed from the chi- nese, possesses much greater individuality and is better preserved to the present day. the japanese have devel- oped the study of nature, especially in birds, with more truthfulness and power of observation than did their ances- tors or rivals, and their imitative style is therefore less conventional. however, even though their delicate pro- ductions have added fresh charms to the old chinese cer- amics, they are not equal to the figures of the work of the finest periods. one of the principal causes of the general progress of japanese art may he found in the fact that a great profusion of examples of design of all sorts, conceived by good artists and carved in wood, are so distributed as to be constantly before the general public. therein lies an element of prog- ress, as it cultivates a taste for objects of art among the common people and creates a demand. when all objects and utensils of service and utility are richly carved and historic ornament. § decorated with ornamental designs, the eye is bound to become educated and the general taste of the people more refined. this is strongly exemplified in the egyptian civilization. indian ornament. . unprogressiveness of indian a ~t.—although less isolated than china, and in more frequent communication with the rest of the world, indian civilization has not experienced such changes as mark the history of many other nations. the social and religious organizations, the priests, and castes of people, the sacred books and poetry, and the manners, customs, and superstitions remain today much as they were among the hindus hundreds of years ago. art naturally has shared in this standstill, and the sub- stance of indian decoration is still limited to a few general features that for many centuries have undergone no funda- mental alteration. the most striking of these characteristics are the continuity and abundance of decoration. the sur- face decoration is usually filled up entirely with a profusion of ornamental forms that, if not exactly alike, are very similar. the ground color is always warm and harmonious—occa- sionally light, though more frequently dark—which serves to unite the designs and add greatly to the general effect. . the method of distribution and the admirable feel- ing for color procures in indian decoration a richness and calm that gives it an undefinable sense of repose. the tendency of the style toward monotony is overcome by this powerful unity that leaves no room for desire or need of greater variety. the designs are usually based on some floral type and are treated in a most conventional manner, and though the imitation bears a closer resemblance to nature than in most of the styles we have studied, it is by no means servile. the type from which an ornament is derived can usually be recognized without trouble, and, although floral ornament is occasionally seen under the pure art form historic ornament. § . when gold ornaments are used on a colored ground, or where gold is used in large masses, there the ground is darkest. where gold is used more thinly, the ground is lighter and more delicate. . when gold ornament is used alone on a colored ground, the color of the ground is carried into it by ornaments or hatchings worked on the ground colors in the gold itself. . when ornaments in one color are on a ground of con- trasting color, the ornament is separated from the ground by an edging of a lighter color to prevent all harshness of contrast. . when, on the contrary, ornaments in a color are on a gold ground, the ornaments are separated from the gold ground by an edging of darker color to prevent the gold from overpowering the ornament. . in other cases where varieties of color are used on a colored ground, a general outline of gold, of silver, or of white or yellow silk separates the ornament from the ground, giving a general tone throughout. : . ,in fig. is shown a diaper pattern taken from an indian textile, and exhibits the regularity of repeated form v \ y a \ a) a a a )k "i it i? w -? in t? “ $ . fig. . ‘ ,) a}. £ } ’ a a * \ ) it; \ > . that thoroughly fills up the surface, as heretofore described. there is a slight tendency toward a geometrical formation § , historic ornament. observable in this pattern, where the wavy line becomes tangent to its neighbor. this geometrical pattern is not as rigidly carried out, however, as in fig. , where the construction lines governing the main details consist merely of semi- circles connected by short straight lines, thereby forming knees, as indicated at a. the style of ornament enclosed in the geometrical figures thus formed is typical of indian design, and shows a number of forms tangent to a general stem, all of which may have had their origin in brush strokes of painted work, or possibly in the shape of the palm leaf, which they slightly resemble. fm, f—wva. p / va i| ll. , h", : ., : . ,” vj _ u ,. . in fig. is shown a typical example of indian ornament taken from a woolen fabric, many of the details of ( r ' \p \i s _ a‘f'zq”$' vfl)wye »na~ i, “q i '- § q“ ‘t . a, r';\ z," x j ' ‘.) ‘it is: aa: . , :e'v ‘iv f‘ o “ 'in’ ‘ wu - ‘ a" v .- > \‘;‘,\él l\‘: $k l\\ g, &‘ \\‘; ; \‘\ ‘.'\_\_ ¢\: fig. ‘ . which will be found similar to the strokes referred to in historic ornament. § fig. . these forms, though more or less foliated, do not bear a very strong resemblance to the natural type, but in fig. we have an example of silverware where the chased design is a conventionalized form of flower, but in more direct imitation of nature than exhibited in the other examples. . these few examples illustrate by comparison the different handling of ornament by the indian designers to suit it to various purposes. the patterns shown in figs. and are seen more usually in light fabrics, while that in fig. is woven in heavier woolen goods, and that in fig. is executed in metal. in objects of low-tone combinations of color, a black gen- eral outline is used to separate the ornament from the ground. the object always appears to be, in the woven fabric, that each ornament should be softly and not harshly defined, that colored objects viewed at a distance should present a neu- tralized bloom, that nearer approach should exhibit the beautiful details, and that a close inspection should divulge the means whereby these effects are produced. in this, the indian carries out the same principle of surface decoration that we find in the architecture of the arabs and moors. the ornament in the spandrel of a moorish arch and in an indian shawl are constructed on precisely the same principles. § _ historic ornament. . indian decoration, like the chinese, is unprogressive and introduces no new forms in its designs, but repeats traditionally generation after generation the same forms for the same purposes. i arabian ornament. . important as was the influence of byzantine art in europe from the sixth to the eleventh century, there was no people that it affected more than the great and spreading arab race that propagated the creed of mohammed, and, after conquering the finest countries in asia and africa, finally obtained a footing even in europe. in the earlier buildings executed by them in egypt, palestine, and spain, the influ- ence of the byzantine style is very strongly marked, and the tradition of the byzantine school affected all the adjacent countries to a greater or less degree. although the arabs must have possessed an original art, only a few traces of it remain, and these are in legends wherein grand buildings are spoken of that date back to remote antiquity. it is known that the wandering and stationary tribes dis- tinguished each other by the name of “felt people " and “clay people," and this would lead one to the impression that the latter title implied a knowledge of ceramics; but the character of the decoration of the pottery of these early tribes is. at present unknown, as is also that of their arms, fabrics, and fixed dwellings. . development of arabian ornament.—on their contact with the greeks, east indians, and persians, the arabian people produced a style of ornament that formed an important part in the compromise now called by the name byzantine. subsequently, when byzantine art had reached its zenith, arabian art, under the influence of islam, took the form under which we now know it, and may have shown in some applications a certain byzantine influence exercised on the arab practice. it is unreasonable, however. to consider o historic ornament. § byzantine art, as is sometimes done, as being originally a formation of the arab style, as the latter has too much char- acter and unity not to be in itself an original conception. there appears to have been a mutual influence exercised between the byzantine and arabian during the earliest peri- ods, as inevitably happens in a contest for supremacy between two neighboring styles; but if the arab received anything from the perfected byzantine, it may be said that they were only partly taking buck their own from an art that had drawn so largely from oriental sources, not only during its forma- tion but also up to the period of its greatest development. . influence of mohammedanism.——\vhen the mohammedan religion spread with such astounding rapidity over the east, the increasing demands of civilization natu- rally led to the creation of a new style of art, and while it is certain that the early mohammedan structures were either an adaptation of old roman or byzantine buildings, or else buildings constructed from the ruins and materials of the ancient monuments, it is equally certain that the new ideas and expression of feelings must at a very early period have given rise to a characteristic form of art. in buildings con- structed largely of old materials, they endeavored to imitate the details borrowed from old buildings, and the same result followed that had already taken place in the transition of the roman style to the byzantine. the imitations were crude and imperfect, but this imperfection created a new order of ideas; and instead of returning to the original model, they gradually threwoff the restrictions, and earlyin their history formed and perfected a style of art peculiarly their own. . with the study of arabian ornament, we meet the first restrictions in the application of certain forms in deco- ration. the mohammedan religion forbids the use of any animal or vegetable forms as an element of design. the koran, which occupies the same position in the moham- medan belief that the bible does in the christian, distinctly states that the follower of mohammed “shall make no § historic ornament. images." we therefore find in the arabian style, as a substi- tute for the foliated design we are now so familiar with, a sys- tem of constructive ornament, the complicated framing of which was fascinating to the geometrical mind of the arab. . this is shown clearly in fig. , which is the out- side of a staircase in egypt, the panels of which are enriched by very beautiful gcmnetrical devices—complicatcd in their construction but really simple in their formation when their historic ornament. § governing lines are traced out. take, for instance, the large triangular panel, and it will be found that all the figures therein are formed by the intersection and crossing of a number of zigzag lines, several of which are exactly the same in pattern but arranged at different angles. this is characteristic of all arabian and moorish designs, as we shall see hereafter. the continuity of the ornament entirely covers the surface in arabian as in indian art, and nothing can be removed from the design without occasioning a feeling of loss. the means employed, however, are different, and, while the mere repetition of objects frequently suflices in indian decoration, the arabian ornament, on the contrary, is built up and bound together in all its parts. everything is con- nected, and, from the circumference to the center of the interlacings in a piece of rose work, there is a continuous line that cannot be broken without destroying the design. this imaginative construction is sometimes double, that is, foi'iticdl by two complete systems that follow each other to an end without confusion, but meet and overlap to produce incidental figures, intersections, and alterations. . arabian decoration. -— notwithstanding this learned complication, arabian decoration is clear and dis- tinct, thanks to the general purity and fineness of the lines and the exclusion of all superfluity. this is also due to the principle observed in the construction of the “roses,” wherein the wider spans are reserved for the extremities of the circumference, leaving to the radiating center, from which they diverge, the fine work that throws out boldly, thus fix- ing the eye on the key of the whole composition as the central point of a circle. . in fig. is shown another example of this style of ornament, taken from a mosaic § historic ornament. pavement in a mosque at cairo, in egypt. here the geo- metrical simplicity of the pattern can be easily traced, as the design consists simply of two horizontally arranged zigzag lines, crossed at regular intervals by sets of diago- nally arranged zigzag lines, the patterns of which are all identical. . in fig. we have an ornament generated on a dif- ferent system but on a similar geometrical idea. this orna- ment, too, is suggestive of the fret pattern, though entirely different from any frets we have hitherto observed. how- ever, the shape of the enclosed figure abca'cj, it will be fig. . observed, is identically the same as the figure g : z'jkl, and the repetition and alternate arrangement of these two pecu- liar outlincs give us the key to the whole system of orna- ment shown in the figure. this result is obtained by an arrangement of the simplest forms imaginable, but the geometrical and intellectual study required to perfect these forms to bring about the result is something tremendous, and the student will readily see that it really requires more brain work to produce a simple look- ing design like fig. , than the complicated arrangement of straight lines shown in fig. . ". another pattern is shown in fig. , and consists of a number of scrolls of a more or less geometrical character. historic ornament. § and, though simple in itself, it is fascinatinegcomplicated in its conception. the design is executed in two colors, and a little study will show that the outlines of the two colors are identical. the light portions of the design in the upper half of the figure are a duplication of the dark portions of the design in the lower half of the figure, and vice versa, every detail on one half being exactly reproducible in the opposite color on the other half, and, if the figure were sawed out on the line dividing the two colors, it would produce two outlines exactly the same in every respect. we called attention to this fact in connection with the greek frets, but no greek ornament ever carried this wonderful mathematical detail to such a nicety. . arabian coloring.—in fig. we have a ceiling taken from a mosque at cairo the repetition of similar forms is clearly marked here, though the geometrical ele- ment is largely lost owing to the surface covered by the flat decoration. the colors here used were a light blue for the groundwork, over which was laid the general design in bright gold, and that overlaid with a pale yel- low, almost approaching a cream tint. light blue and pale yellow are very prominent tints in arabian ornament; red is used but sparingly, and then of a most intense shade; while green is introduced in small arabesque figures, scat- tered through with others of gold and occasionally of blue. the ground colors in nearly all instances are blue, creamy yellow, and occasionally red. - § historic ornament. . fig. is from an illuminated copy of the koran, and illustrates the influence of byzantine art on that of arabia. the general construction lines of the ornarnentare . byzantine in character, while the filling in is typically ara- bian. the small irregular spaces in the border of the desigr a " a ‘ w. ‘ m _ -"..- ~\ . mummmmmmnumnmnnmmnmifhw. iuumullmillmllmnmmlmm immmmmmmumummwwm . . 'uirm:m:unmalwn .m:_ at a are green, the square enclosed spaces at b are a brilliant red, and the groundwork that shows through at c is a deli- cate shade of blue. the ornaments worked on these grounds and in these spaces are either a bright gold or white, and the filling in of the general outline is a creamy shade of yellow. . in the primitive arabian style, unmixed with the persian, the flower, properly so called, is never to be found, but in its place appear other forms resembling it and are apparently inspired directly by nature. this sort of sub- ject, half way between imaginary conception and the repre- sentation of natural flowers, does not appear simply as a termination of scrolls, as among the greeks, but forms an integral part of the decoration and does not break the lineal network. historic ornament. § ;. turkish ornament. . characteristics of turkish ornament.—the architecture of the turks, as seen at constantinople, is patterned after the early byzantine style, though their sys- tem of ornamentation is a. modification of the arabian style. in fact, it may be considered as an application of arabian ornament, without any understanding of the meaning, deri- vation, or type of that ornament. when the art of one people is borrowed by another of the same religion but of different character, temperament, and customs, the resulting designs are certain to show the defi- ciency of intellect or refinement that the borrowing people possessed in contrast to the others; and this is the case with the turks when compared with the arabs. there is the same difference in the refinement, elegance, and judgment of the turkish ornament and arabian ornament as there is between these two peoples. the turks themselves can hardly be considered an artistic nation. they have built buildings and executed designs in their cities, but have employed foreign artists to do the work. all their public buildings, therefore, present a mixed style. it is not at all unusual to find in a turkish building floral ornaments of arabian and persian origin side by side with details from rome, the turks having exhibited a tendency to abandon the traditional style of their forefathers. the turks are the first of the mohammedan nations to adopt european fashions in architecture, and their modern buildings and palaces are the work of european architects and artists, and are designed in the most approved european style. . the turkish embroideries give about the only style of ornament that we can consider strictly national, as work ‘of this character must necessarily exhibit the characteristics of the race, and, judging from this, it will be readily seen that their art instinct is far inferior to that of india. indian embroidery is perfect in the distribution of its forms and all § historic ornament. its principles of ornamentation. with turkish ornamenta- tion, the only examples we have that approach any degree of perfection are in the carpets, but these are executed mostly in asia minor, and are probably not designed by turks. the designs of most of them appear more arabian, and differ from the persian carpets in being more conven- tional in their foliage treatment. . the general principles of the distribution of form are the same in turkish and arabian ornament, but there is a difference in the treatment. in both the arabianiand moresque styles, the surface of an ornament is only slightly rounded and the enrichment is secured by sinking in the lines, or, where the surface was left smooth, additional pat- tern upon pattern was obtained by painting. turkish orna- ment, on the contrary, presents a curved surface, and the effect is not as broad as that produced by the sunken-feather treatment of the arabian and moresque. another peculiar- ity that readily distinguishes turkish ornament from ara- bian is its abuse of the reentering curve, thus causing all its detail to have a feeling of instability and unrest. this is also, to a certain extent, characteristic of the persian style. in the moorish style, however, it appears only exceptionally. . it is a very difficult matter, in fact, almost impos sible, to clearly explain the differencesin styles of ornament that have so strong a family resemblance as the persian, arabian, and turkish, but, after practice, the eye detects them as readily as it does the difference between roman and greek. the general principles remaining the same, there will be found a peculiarity in the proportions of the masses—more or less grace in the flowing of the curves, a fondness for particular directions in the leading lines, and a peculiar interweaving of forms, the general form of the conventional foliage usually remaining the same. the rela- tive degree of fancy, delicacy, or coarseness with which these are drawn will at once distinguish them as works of the historic ornament. § refined and spirited persian, the not alone refined, but reflective, arabian, or the unimaginative turk. . the most prominent colors in turkish ornament are green and black; in fact, these form a feature of the orna- ment. in modern turkish ornament, green is much more prominent than in ancient examples, where blue was the important color. persian ornament. :. characteristics of persian ornament.—the time at which we are most familiar with persian art is at the period of its greatest splendor. the outlines of the orna- ment are generally taken from the conceptions of arabian architecture, but modified by indian tradition and the peculiar genius of the persian race. the style of persian ornament is less compressed and austere than the ara- bian, and possesses more freedom and elegance, while its sources of double derivation give it a greater element of variety. the floral motive is employed in both its aspects. in some examples it is scattered through the decoration with apparent freedom, and, in others, inserted in the linked net- work and usually placed at the intersection of lines; but even in the latter case, it is treated in a manner that is medium between the arab conventionality and the indian naturalism. a consideration of the. characteristics of the persians will help us to understand this more fully. . persian compared with arabian art—the arabs belonged to the mohammedan sect of omar, while the persians had split from this faith, and belonged to the sect of ali, and were great drinkers of wine. they therefore attributed to flowers a symbolical language, and did not exclude the representation of flowers in their decoration, which is also animated by real and fantastic animals, and sometimes, though rarely, with the human figure. the § historic ornament. resources resulting from this mixed style are enhanced by the manual skill and remarkable fertility possessed by the persians. bookbinders, potters,e nbroiderers, and minia~ ture painters emulate one another in taste and skill. per- sian carpets are still considered the finest in the world, and the dishes, vases, and enamel bricks from that country are models of taste, and european art seeks them out and manufacturers endeavor to equal them by imitation. . persian compared with indian art.-the indian and persian styles resemble each other in their polychro- matic decoration. the rule is usually a silhouette, with geometrical outlines relieved by conventional coloring on a dominating generating ground. . the mohammedan architecture of persia never seems to have attained the perfection of the arabian build- ings in cairo. although presenting considerable grandeur in the main features, the general outlines are less pure, and there is awant of elegance in all their structural details compared with the edifices of cairo. it is not strange, therefore, that we find their system of construction much inferior to that of the arabians and moors. the per- sians, unlike the arabs and moors, were free to intro- duce animal life, and thus mixing up subjects drawn from real life with the inanimate forms of decoration, they were led away from the tendency to a pure style of ornament. . the great attention given to the illumination of manuscripts in persia, which were widely spread through all mohammedan countries, would naturally tend to spread the influence of this mixed style, and the decorations of houses at cairo and damascus, and the mosques and foun- tains of even constantinople, are tainted with it to a greater or less extent. groups of natural flowers are constantly found growing from vases and enclosed in panels of com ventional arabian ornament. historic ornament. § moorisii ornalient. . derivation of moorish art.—-the moorish style, with but a few distinguishing characteristics, is the direct offspring of the arabian. the methods of construction, the < .'~@ ' . e». _ .. $ ; = ..k \qi i v forms of ornament, and the frequent use of inscriptions are common to both styles. however, in moorish decoration, a characteristic feature is the use of a third color, or ground § historic ornament. surface, worked over or between two others that serve as a framework. this may be seen in fig. , which is a detail from the alcazar, at seville. here the geometrical con- struction of the arabian style is everywhere evident, while in the soffit of the arch at a is seen the typical relief moorish ornament painted in three colors, as hereafter explained. . the alhambra.—in discussing the ornament of the moors, we will confine our illustrations largely to details taken from the alhambra, in spain, because this is one of their chief works of art, and the one in which their system of decoration reached its culminating point. in fact, the alhambra occupies the same position in moorish art as does the parthenon in the greek, or hagia sophia in the byzantine style. every principle of art that we find in the ornament of any other people, we find obeyed by the moors in this erection of the alhambra. here are the eloquence of egyp- tian art, the grace and refinement of the greek, and the geometrical complexity and variety of the byzantines and arabs. . characteristlcs of moorish ornament—the ornament lacked the charm of symbolism, however, that is so characteristic of egyptian ornament, for this was forbid- den by the religion of the moors; but its place is more than supplied by the arabic inscriptions, which address them- selves directly to the eye by their personal beauty, and not only excite the intellect by the difliculties of deciphering their complex and curious involutions, but also delight the imagination when read by the beauty of the sentiments they express and the music of their composition. long fantastic letters, interwoven with graceful but intricate geometrical patterns, as shown at a in fig. , lead the eye to decipher the words, and we find, as a part of the construction of their very buildings, sentiments that are ever present and asso- ciated with all their daily doings, and ever simple but truthful phrases elaborately twisted or intricately woven, such as, “ there is no conqueror but god. ” historic ornament. § . the builders of this wonderful structure were fully aware of the greatness of their work. it was inserted in the inscriptions on the walls that this building surpassed fig. . all other buildings. they also state in the glittering eccen- tricities of the design that, “he who stops to study with attention will reap the benefit of a commentary on decoration. " § historic ornament. . . decorated construction and constructed decoratiom—lct us now follow the injunction of this inscription and learn some of the general principles that ll'. , . < “. ‘ '“. \ l i i ,. is i é. -~ ‘ r ‘ : we: ' ' q; " > "if t ilqeq' fig. . appear to have guided the moors in their decoration. in the first place, they always regarded the first principle of architecture—t decorate construction and never to construct decoration. historic ornament. § in moorish art, the decoration arises most naturally from the construction, and the constructive idea is carried out in every detail of the ornamentation of the surface, as shown in fig. , which is a window opening, around which, it will be observed, the ornament is arranged to set forth and empha- size the opening as a structural detail. we have already said that true beauty results from a repose of mind, felt when the eye, the intellect, and the affections are satisfied and free from all sense of want. when a building is con- structed falsely, and appears to derive or give support with- out doing either one or the other, it fails to afford this repose, and therefore can never pretend to true beauty, however harmonious it may be in itself. the moors and the mohammedan races generally have ever regarded this rule, and we never find a useless or superfluous ornament, or one that does not arise quietly and naturally from the decorated surface. the lines grow out of each other in gradual undulations; there are no excres- cences; nothing could be removed and leave the design as good, or make it any better. . the surface in fig. is entirely filled with orna_ mentation, but no detail of it can in any way be altered and so improve the design. in a general sense, if its construc: tion is properly attended to, there can be no excrescences. the general forms were first cared for; these were subdi- vided by general lines, the interstices of which were then filled with ornament that was again subdivided and enriched for closer inspection. (this will also be observed by careful study of fig. .) they carried out this principle with the greatest refinement, and the harmony and beauty of all their ornamentation derived their chief success from this observ- ance; their main divisions contrasted and balanced perfectly, the detail never interferes with the general form, and, when seen at a distance, the main lines strike the eye and the fine detail disappears; nearer approached, more detail comes into the composition, and, on close inspection, all detail of the surface appears as a grand powdering of ornament. the g historlc ornament. effect of this treatment is well illustrated in fig. , where the general arched construction is the main consideration. the subdivision of the surface into general panels by means of ornamental bands is of next importance, and the surface ' _> .h_ ‘ i ."w as . d -?i f. fr if/ g; ii - a: w l i ‘r-¢t_>>c=):<-.‘-‘yela' v, ' i. in" i-li'ié é a "— fig. . decoration of these panels then receives the final considera- tion. however, though these may be left to the last, they receive the closest attention and a care in their treatment not even second to that in the construction of the arch itself. . the primary elements.—i-iurm ny of form appears to exist in the proper balancing and contrast of the historic ornament. § straight, inclined, and curved elements; as in color there can be no perfect composition in which either of the three primary colors is wanting, so in form, whether structural or decorative, there can be no perfect composition in which either of the three primary elements is wanting, and the variety of harmony in a design depends on the predominance or subordination of these three forms. . in surface decoration, an arrangement consisting of straight lines crossed by other straight lines, as in fig. , , , historic ornament. is monotonous and affords no feeling of satisfaction. thisis because only one of the primary elements is present—the straight line; but, if we introduce lines that tend to carry the eye toward the angles, as in fig. , the pleasure is increased and the figure has more repose. this is due to the presence flo. . fig. ?. fig. . flo. . of another primary element—the inclined line. now, add the third element—the curved line—as shown in fig. , and the figure expresses complete harmony. in this case, the straight line or square is the leading form and the others are subordinate, but the same result can be obtained by making the inclined line the leading form, as shown in fig. . . it is the neglect of this simple rule that causes so many failures in paper hangings and carpets, and more espe- cially in articles of dress. the lines of papers generally appear to run up through the ceiling most disagreeably in one direction only, carrying the eye right through the walls of the apartment. the study of any design or pattern that has been regarded with any degree of satisfaction in ancient times, will show, as component parts of its structure, the straight line, the curved line, and the inclined line characteristic of the surface decoration of the moors. ' . consistency of moorish ornament. in the decorative art of the moors, all lines flow out from a parent historic ornament. § stem. every ornament, no matter how remote, can be traced to its branch and root. an ornament is so adapted to the surface decorated that it often appears to suggest the general form rather than to have been suggested by it. in all cases where foliage flows out naturally from a parent stem, the eye is never offended as is done by modern practice in the random introduction of ornament without reason for its existence. however irregular the space they have to fill, the moors commence by dividing it into equal areas, and around these they fill in their detail, but invariably return to their parent stem. they appear in this to work by a process analogous to that of nature. . take, for instance, the leaf of avine, the object here being to distribute the sap from the parent stem to the extremities; it is evident that the main stem should divide the leaf as nearly as possible into equal areas. so again with the minor divisions, each area is then again subdivided by intermediate lines that all follow the same law of equal distribution, even to the most minute filling in of the stem feeders. . the moors follow another principle—that of radi- ation from 'the parent stem—as may be seen in a chestnut leaf, wherein the leaflets all radiate from the parent stem, each leaflet diminishes in size toward the extremities, and each area is proportionate to the leaf. the orientals carried out this principle with marvelous perfection, as did the greeks in their honeysuckle ornament. a greatdiflerence between the greek ornament and that of the arabian and moresque, however, is that the former grows its ornament scroll out of scroll as before explained, and the latter grow their ornaments off from each side of a continuous stem. with the moors, all junctions of curved lines with curved lines, or curved with straight, are tangen- tial to one another. . conventionalism in moorish ornament.—a charm found in the works of the arabs and moors lies in § historic ornament. their conventional treatment of ornament. their creed for- bade them to represent living forms, and, therefore, they could not let their art decline to realism even though they so desired. they worked on the same lines that nature worked, but always avoided a direct transcript; they took her prin- ciples but they did not copy her works. . coloring in moorish rnan_ ent.—the coloring of the moorish ornaments was treated as skilfully as was the form. they followed certain fixed principles founded on i observations of natural laws. the colors employed on their stucco work were in all cases a combination of the three pri- maries—blue, red, and yellow, the last being represented by gold—and the secondary colors—purple, green, and orange— occurred only in the mosaic dados. these, being nearer the eye, formed a point of repose from the more brilliant color- ing above. . it may be remarked here that among the egyp- tians, greeks, arabs, and moors, the primary colors were used exclusively in the earliest period of the arts, and, during the decadence, the secondary colors were used. thus, in egypt, the temples of the pharaonic period were painted entirely in primary colors, while those in the ptolemaic period used the secondaries. the early greek temples were deco- rated in the primary colors, while at pompeii every variety of shade possible appears. in modern cairo, and in the east generally, we have green appearing frequently side by side with red, where blue would have been used in the earlier times. this is equally true of the works of the middle ages. in the early manuscripts and in stained glass, the primary colors were chiefly used, although other colors were not entirely excluded, while, in later times, every variety of shade and tint is used indiscriminately, with preference for none. . in moorish art, the primary colors were used in the upper portions of the design, and the secondary and tertiary colors on the lower portions. this is entirely in accordance with natural law. we have the primary blue in the sky, the o historic ornament. § secondary green in the trees and fields, and the tertiaries in the earth itself. it is also observable in flowers, where the primary colors are the buds and flowers, and the secondaries are the leaves and stalks. . the ancients always observed this rule in the best periods of art; though in egypt we do occasionally see a secondary green used in the upper portions of a temple, but this arises from the fact that all ornament in egypt was symbolic, and if a lotus leaf were used in the upper part of a building, it would necessarily be colored green. the law is true in general, and the aspect of an egyptian temple of the pharaonic period usually gives the primaries above the secondaries, while, in the ptolemaic period, the order was inverted. in pompeii, we occasionally find in the interior of the houses a. gradual coloring, from the roof down, of a light to a darker color, ending with black, but this was by no means universal. ' . system of moorish coloring.—the system of moorish coloring might be considered absolutely perfect. all the surfaces were modeled and proportioned according to the color they were to receive, and, in using the colors blue, red, and gold, they took care to place them in such positions that they should be best seen themselves and add most to the general effect. on molded surfaces they placed red (the strongest color of the three) in the depths, where it might be softened by shadow, and never a raised surface; blue was placed in the shade, but not deep shade; and gold on all the surfaces exposed to strong light, for it was evi- dent that by this arrangement alone could their truc value be obtained. the several colors are either separated by white bands or by the shadow caused by the relief of the ornament itself, and this seems to be an absolute principle required in coloring—colors should never be allowed to impinge on one another. . in fig. , the background a, on which the orna- ment is placed, was of a deep-red color, while the leaf forms § historic ornament. were colored with the primary blue. all the rest of the surface, including the necks of the columns, was gold, and a grand harmonious bloom was spread over the whole design. . blending of colors—in coloring the grounds of the various diapers, the blue always occupies the largest area, and this is in accordance with the theory in optics and the experiments that have been made with the prismatic spectrum. rays of light are said to neutralize one another in the proportion of yellow, red, and blue. thus, it will be seen that a quantity of blue equal to the sum total of the required quantity of red and yellow will produce an effect of harmony and prevent the predominance of any one color historic ornament. § over the others. in the alhambra, yellow was replaced by gold, which tended toward a reddish yellow, and the blue on this account was further increased in proportion, to counteract the tend- ency of the red to over- power the other colors. . moorish orna- ment is governed by cer- tain geometrical patterns in its formation, although the number of these patterns is small. in fig. is shown an in- terlaced pattern consist- f g. . ing, firsl, of vertical and horizontal lines arranged in pairs, the distance between each pair being twice the dis tance between the lines composing each pair; srcona’, of diag- onal lines drawn through the pattern at an angle of °, and spaced a distance apart equal to the verti- cal and horizontal pairs. the diagonal lines are arranged so that the set of squares formed by their intersection will contain in their centers the inter- section of the vertical and horizontal pairs. . in fig. is shown a slight variation fm. . of this same interlaced pattern, wherein the vertical and horizontal lines are drawn singly and the diagonal lines are drawn in pairs, but of § historic ornament. slightly different proportion from fig. . the amount of moorish ornament that can be developed from these two figures is unlimited, and the moors themselves extended even this limit by the variety of coloring in the different parts. figs. and are based on the system shown in fig. , and figs. and are developed from the system shown . was ' i" ill ! m "ill ‘; why ‘ k“ ,, i milli?— "'"in‘i ' _ (\mmikw/wuhr . i *" -i i immmml i k q i tllllllllliilllllllliniiliiiil\illllillllllllllillllllllilllllllfllllllllillllll“hillllillhfillllllllilllllillill"illlillllmlllllllllllllllllllllllllllmllllli fig. ' . , , |l|nnmqu "illmlmml | , r “a i‘ < i in fig. . a slight variation of the systems themselves will produce most remarkable results in the figures. fig. . . however much disguised, the whole ornamen- tation of the moors is constructed geometrically. their historic ornament. § fondness for geometrical forms is evinced by the great use of mosaics, in which their imagination had full play. p . . however complicated may be their patterns, they are all extremely simple when the principle of setting them is ‘l. fir/s )(_/ . v v_/ r . / ? gop§ ( )”qu v, - easiest? \ _ < §q <%%@ a“ as ass was as; ' )‘€ w (\‘j ' % \§ ' @a- once understood. they all arise from the intersection of equally distant lines around fixed centers. § historic ornament. western art. celtic ornaiment. . origin and character.——in studying the orna- ment of western europe, we follow a chronological order instead of an ethnological one, as we have been doing here- tofore, the history of ornament in this section being pro- gressive and free from outside influences except to a very limited extent. when byzantine art spread over western europe, as it did about the twelfth century, it must have found among the nations of celtic origin an indigenous art, arising from the peculiar aptitudes of that race. the celts undoubtedly had a spontaneous national art, though its birthplace, whether in scandinavia or ireland, has never been satisfac- torily decided. . interlacing forms almost the only element of the celtic designs of the earlier period, and this establishes its antiquity, for the intertwining ornament is essentially a primitive style. its distinctive mark is the division of the surface, decorated by such a combination of lines that the development is usually happy, possible, and logical, and there is no doubt that the origin of these designs was pro- cured originally from interlaced cords. the pliability of this original type would account for the curved instead of acute angles, this being a characteristic difference between the celtic and arabian geometrical designs. . the variety of productions obtainable from such simple elements is remarkable. in many of them the com- plications prove, by their skilful divisions, and the ingenuity of the windings, a practical comprehension of ornamental construction. there is lacking, however, in this style, a vital element—the element of more extensive representation —and its resources were threatened with exhaustion from historic ornament. § having used every possible combination of the intertwinings of a cord. . introduction of animal forms.—in combi- nation with byzantine art, celtic ornament advanced in style. a portion of the original interlacings was still retained, and for the discarded part was substituted the stem from which sprang the leafwork and terminated in floral spans. having thus attained some decorative richness, the celtic style rose to the level of art; at the same time, the differ- ence already mentioned between it and purely geometric conceptions, such as are usually found in arabian decora- tions, became more striking, from the frequent introduction of the heads of quadrupeds and birds, serving as terminals to some of the principal lines that were made to represent bodies elongated out of all just proportion or probability, and from which emerge feet and claws corresponding with the head. such as they are, these fantastic and grotesque images constitute a separate art that the interlacings alone could never have reached. . distinguishing characteristics.— the chief characteristics of the early celtic style consist : first, of the entire absence of foliage or other vegetable ornament; ‘:- and, the extreme intricacy and excessive minuteness and elaboration of the various patterns, most of which are geo- metrical, consisting of interlaced ribbon work, diagonal or spiral lines—each of which invariably wove itself alternately above and below each successive transverse strand—strange, monstrous animals, and birds with long topknots and tongues and tails intertwining in almost endless knots. some of the manuscripts have entire pages covered with elaborate pat- terns in compartments, the whole forming a beautiful cruci- form design, and one of these facing a commencement of each of the four gospels. the labor employed in such a mass of work must have been immense. the care most infinite. as a critical vd historic ornament. examination with a magnifying, glass does not detect an error in the truth of the lines or the regularity of the interlacings; yet with all this minuteness, the most harmonious elfect of coloring has been produced. . intrleacy of deslgn.—of the curious intricacy of some of these designs an idea may be ob- tained by following a ribbon in one' of these patterns, as, for instance, in the upper compartment of fig. . the method adopted to .secure this intricate interlacing, so that each strap shall alternately cross above and below each following one, can be better understood iii-ll!!! www ~ ' nw? ! (d) by reference to fig. , where the preliminary arrange- ment of a woven pattern is laid out at (a) and the turning and joining of its exterior ends are shown at (/ ), while historic ornament. § at (r) is seen the completed interlacement and complication of interior curves and returnings. a r\'\"\'\—\ "\'\"\-\"\ /.\/<\/~z w zl \ “ & w // / / / r‘ awmnmam / \/ fig. . \ sometimes two ribbons run parallel to each other, but are interlaced alternately, as in fig. . when allowable, the fig. . ribbon is dilated and angulated to fill up particular places in the design, as in fig. . the simplest modification of this pattern, of course, is the double oval seen in the angles of fig. . this occurs in greek and syr- ian manuscript, in roman __ tessellated pavements, but rarely in celtic mann- il script. . syn bolism.— no symbolic meaning seems to have been at- tached to the celtic orna- ments, except perhaps in the designs so frequently found without beginning or end. in which appears what might be a symbol of eternity. § historic ornament. the union of the celtic and byzantine styles did not entirely give way to the gothic style with which it long existed. it furnished types for the finest ornamentation of glass and manuscripts, that in this period, from the eleventh to the fourteenth century, resembles stained glass on a reduced scale. gothic ornadient. . evolution.—gothlc art grew out of and suc- ceeded the romanesque in western europe in the same manner that the byzantine did in the east. each was the result of an attempt to adapt a modified roman style to the new conditions caused by political, religious, and geograph- ical changes. in western europe, however, the roman- esque style failed to develop into a new architectural system until about the middle of the tenth century, while the byzantine became a perfect style of art before the close of the sixth century. . influence of rellglon.——gothic art in every par- ticular was directly opposed to classic art, not only because it was developed by the nations that had conquered rome, but because it was a christian art, in opposition to a pagan art, and its architecture was based on an economical system of construction, while that of classic rome was an extrava- gant construction. its greatest monuments were built to the glorification of the supreme being, while those of roman art were for the glorification of the empire. it is not surprising, therefore, to find the best and purest exam- ples of gothic art in localities most distant from rome, and, as we gradually approach the south of europe, we find gothic ornament tainted more and more with classic influ- ence until, in italy, the examples are so different in feeling and expression from those we find in england that they constitute almost an entirely different style. in france, the style is not as pure as in england, but it contains none of the extreme variations seen in italy, and being patterned historic ornament. § more or less after the english examples, derives what good it has from that country. . german and english gothic. in germany, gothic art was copied from j the french, and carried the imperfec- ' ‘ tions of the french style to a still lower degree, and its entrance into italy from germany renders its condition in the seat of the old roman empire so debased that it possesses none of the underlying prin- ciples of the pure gothic style. english-gothic ornament may be di- vided into three general periods, each associated approximately with the cen- tury of its greatest development. these periods are called the early english, or thirteenth century, the lh'mmlm’, or fourteenth century, and the pvrpma’z'cular, or fifteenth century. fig. . generally speaking, the early english period is char- acterized architecturally by long, narrow, lancet-shaped § historic ornament. windows arranged in groups of two or three, as shown in fig. , the space between the openings usually containing a third perforation in the form of a trefoil or quaterfoil included under the same dripstone as the window opening. the mullions, or bars, separating the window openings were, toward the latter part of this period, split to form a network in the upper part of the window, called tracery, as shown in fig. . this tracery was greatly elaborated as the style advanced, and filled the upper portion of the window with a complicated series of geometrical forms that were frequently richly elaborated with a. ball-flow” orna- mmt, as shown in fig. . . the ball-flower ornament.—the ball-flower ornament is characteristic of the decorated period, and - = (litnnilinniiimiii fig. . 'i will llllllllllll consists of conventionalized floral forms nearly spherical in shape, a detail of which is shown in fig. . they were not always used to such an excess as is shown in fig. , and were inserted un- ‘ der the dripstone at regular inter- vals, as shown in fig. , which is a sedile, or scat, sometimes built in the interior walls of a church. the dripstones of this period usually terminated at each end in the carved head of some person of prominence, such as the king or bishop, as shown in fig. . as we approach the perpendicular period, the lines of historic ornament. § tracery are still more complicated but arranged more in perpendicular pan- els, the horizontal elements being sup- pressed as much as possible. . designs for \vindowv heads—all these designs for window heads were worked out on simple geo- metrical combina- tions, as shown in fig. , which is a window with six days, or openings, divided in two groups of three each by means of pointed § historic ornament. arches shown at baa and cde, over which a circle is struck, with its center at , whose diameter is equal to half the width of the window, and its circumference is divided into twelve parts, as shown at , , , , etc. within each of these parts, small circles, tangent to one another and to the circumference of the great circle, are described, and form the generating elements of the interior design. fig. . this example is given with its construction lines simply to show how these details are geometrically worked out. all the elements of the design can be located and executed by means of a pair of compasses and a straightedge, without any other device to lay off measurements. the lower part of these windows on the exterior, during the perpendicular period, as said before, were divided into historic ornament. g a: .qh . i . ‘ ...‘ ; . a h. . . . . , ? iv} ._ . ? ate. ..¢ ,zf s. .~ ~..¢ it s“?! . may...” . has"? ‘ ‘ . {rdvlvin . . . \ c s n . ' . ' .f- '. ‘ "* rear-i § historic ornament. long panels, the total window opening usually being of immense area, as shown in fig. , which is, the west front of st. george’s chapel, at windsor. this also shows the general exterior appearance of the gothic architecture of great britain, and, with the west front of westminster abbey, shown in fig. , will be interesting to compare “i; ' ’j'vyéz lrll'lillllij with the gothic art of other countries, which we will con- sider hereafter. . french \‘vlndow 'l‘raeery.—in france, the progress of window tracery was similar to that of eng- land, but on less systematic lines, and the doors and win- dows tend more to rich elaboration on the exterior, usu- ally being carved with full-length human figures, as shown in fig. , which is one of the entrance doors to the church of notre dame, paris, the full front elevation of which is shown in fig. . a comparison of fig. historic ornament. c with the two examples of english gothic will be interest- ing, showing the tendency of the latter to vertical lines more characteristic of the gothic style, and of the french to horizontal lines influenced by its closer proximity to classic art. . gothic architecture in italy. in italy, gothic architecture is unique, and though the palazzo vecchio, 'vr !ywir ., , int-gm . ‘ i'iv "rnm “i‘li'i'ft f fig. . at florence, shown in fig. , possesses the crude, bold, unassuming construction of the early gothic castles, it scarcely represents the fundamental principle on which the italian design is developed. it is in venice that we find more elaborate examples, where window tracery is carried to a most fanciful extreme. the foseari palace, shown in fig. , shows the gradual § historic ornament. '? development of this window treatment, which seems to con- stitute the entire idea. of the italian-gothic style. in the / / / / a ' lower story we have the plain ogival arch, and in the central portions of the second and third stories, small colonnades, i historic ornament. § connected by pointed arches, and in the upper of the two with pointed arches, separated by plate tracery. in the top story, this tracery is carried to an elaborate extreme. this system of treatment, though based on entirely diflerent structural ideas from the gothic of the north, brought about many happy results, however, and the palace of con- tarini fasan, also known as the house of desdemona, shown in fig. , exhibits how adaptable the style of this vene- tian work is to modern requirements by the careful pro- portioning and grouping of its parts and treatment of its details. _ it is not in the exterior of these buildings that we find the most of value to us in ornamental design, except possibly in venetian work; therefore, the treatment of the interior details we will now consider in regular order, having under- stood the transition in style that took place from the british isles to the italian peninsula. . evolution of gothic ornament—the transi- tion of the round arch, characteristic of the romanesque style, to the pointed arch, characteristic of the gothic style, is easily traced in buildings where the two styles are inter- mingled, many of these being extant about the beginning of the thirteenth century, as shown in fig. , which is taken from an arcade of canterbury cathedral, in england. but the passage from romanesque ornament to that of the gothic period is by no means so easily traced. all traces of the acanthus leaf have by this time disap- peared, and we find a purely conventional style of ornament prevalent in all buildings of the time. the nearest approach to the acanthus formation we find in the illuminated manu_ scripts of the twelfth century, where ornamental forms, such as shown in fig. , are used, and appear to have been derived from some old greek manuscripts, as gothic orna- ments are formed by a continuous stem throwing off leaves on the outer side and terminating in a flower. early english ornament is the most perfect, both in prim- ciple and in execution, of all the gothic period. there is as § historic ornament. much elegance in distinct modulations of form as there is in the ornament of the greeks. it is always in harmony with the structural features of the building, and always grows naturally from them. it fulfils every one of the conditions that we desire to find in a perfect style of art, but it remained perfect only so long as the style remained conventional. as the style became less idealized and more direct in imitation, it ceased to be an ornament of structural features, but became ornament applied. . characteristics.— in the capitals of the columns of early english architecture, the ornament rises directly from the shaft, above the neck- ing of which the column splits historic ornament. § into a series of stems, each stem terminating in a flower, as shown in fig. . this is analogous to the mode of deco- rating the egyptian capital. in the decorated style, on the contrary, where a much nearer approach to nature was attempted, it was no longer possible to treat a natural leaf as part of the shaft, and therefore the shaft is terminated by a bell shape, around which the leaves are twined, and the more natural these were made, the less artistic became the arrangement, as shown in fig. . this method of applying orn'ament reminds us of the roman-corinthian capital. in the perpendicular period, the capitals of the columns were usually plain, and the shaft consisted of a cluster of § historic ornament. small columns. in some large buildings, however, the capi- tals were carved with shallow foliage of a pronounced geometrical shape, as shown in fig. . in foliage and running ornaments on hands and moldings, the early english period shows examples where the lines of the ornament follow the general directions of the lines of the mold- ing, and the foliated work is conventionally rendered, but, at the same time, is graceful and natural, as shown in fig. . in painted bands, the lines usu- ally are easy and flow- . ing, following the principle of carved work, as shown in fig. . during the decorated period, however, there is less effort made to continue the foliage in the direction of the molding, and the guiding stem fre- quently wanders directly across the molding, from one side to the other, pre- serving the governing principle of throwing leaves off alternately, but at the same time chopping the molding up into a number of sec- tions rather than giving it a feeling of continuity. in fig. is shown an example of molding from this period, where the guiding stem of the foliation crosses and recrosses the molding almost at right angles to the line of its direction, and though the leaves are arranged to cover up this guiding fig. . fig. . historic ornament. § stem to a certain extent, the fact still remains that its most prominent sections are seen across the molding, instead of. flowing with it. . in the perpendicular period, the system of decora- tion is still further removed from that of the early english, and the molding is fre- quently divided up into a number - of rectangular panels, each of which is decorated to represent some specific natural form, but so convention- alized as to be reduced to a pronounced geometrical outline. this is shown in fig. , where the leaves of the grape vine are reduced to fig. . perfect rectangles, spaced evenly along the molding, between which bunches of grapes are geometrically arranged. . spaudrels.»-in the spandl'els of the arches, so long as the conventionalism of the early english style was maintained, one main stem -. was distributed over the panel, from which sprang leaves and flowers, as shown in f i'g. ; but as the style advanced the stem ceased to be the guiding f", ;, g historic ornament. form of the ornament, and, in the endeavor to represent in stone the softness of nature, lost all its grace and decorative characteristics. finally, the stem as a leading feature dis- appears, and we find the spandrels filled with three immense leaves, springing from a twisted stem in the center, and bearing no structural relation to the panel on which they are planted, as shown in fig. . . diapers. —— in the painted wall decora- tions and diapers, the early english artists usually divided the surface into a number of geometrical forms within which a simple con- ventional ornament was introduced resembling tile work. the devices covering these ornaments were sometimes heraldic and other times based on forms borrowed from the vegetable world, as may be seen in fig. . during the decorated period, the wall divisions are less naturally divided, and circular disks, within which are' stenciled geo- metrical patterns, are spread over a wall sur- face, and between them _ are arrangcd shields with coats of arms and other devices, as shown in fig. . another system prevalent in the decorated period was to divide the wall into a number of bands, each of which historic ornament. § was decorated with a running ornament, as shown in fig. , where the character of this running ornament is not widely different from that seen in the early english period, as shown in fig. . how- 's. ~ aw ever, introduced with this foliation are forms from the animal world that seem to possess no relation to the design, or the ornament, or the posi- tion that they occupy. the diapers of the perpendicular period are attempts at realism, and in fig. is shown a painted wall in which the pointed arch of ogival form and the foliations and crockets characteristic of the carved work of this period are attempted in the repro- duction on the flat surface. this form of arch, with its compound curve — con- vex below and concave above—is a distinguishing characteristic of the per- pendicular period, as is also the subdivision of its under surface into the small arches or foliations, as shown. within each of these panels (which in all work were long and nar- row, giving the style its name of perpendicular), the wall was decorated in the conventional pattern as shown, and executed in two colors. similar patterns were also used for silks, tapes- tries, and other fabrics of this period. l a ' “f _ k i r .r a, ' fm. a § historic ornament. in fig. is shown another style of wall treatment of the perpendicular period, where the surface remains flat and no attempt is made to depict arches or moldings bor- rowed from carved ornament, but details from the vegetable world are drawn realis- tically against a back- ground interspersed with eonventionalized outlines of leaf forms. . zenith of architectural devel- opment.—in the thir- teenth century, beyond all others, architecture was at its zenith. the mosques of cairo, the alhambra in spain, westminster abbey, and the salisbury and lincoln cathedrals, in v england, all possess the same secret of producing the broadest general effect combined with the most elaborate decoration. in all these buildings there is a family like- ness; although the forms differ and the forces that have called them into existence are totally unlike, yet the prin- ciples that they embrace are the same. they all exhibit the same care for the leading masses of composition, the same appreciation of the undulations of form, the same correct observation of natural principles in the ornamentation, and the same elegance and refinement in all the decoration. the attempt to produce at the present day a building of the character of those in the thirteenth century would be vain indeed. whitewashed walls with stained glass and encaustic tiles cannot alone sustain the effect that was arrived at when every molding had its color best adapted to develop its form, when from the floor to the roof not an inch of space but that had its elaborate and appropriate ornament—an § historic ornament. . rayonnant period.—in the rayonnant period, the capitals of the columns, like those of the decorated period in england, are formed of bell shapes over which foliage is arranged; but, as shown in fig. , the french arrangement is far infe- rior to the english, inas- much as no attempt is here made to have the foliage a part of the sup- porting construction. it is evident that the bell shape does the support- fig. h . ing of the superimposed load, and the carved vine is simply an ornament laid on the surface to break up its monotony. . flamboyant pe- rlod. ‘— the flamboyant- style, shown in fig. , carries this fault to still greater extent, and the twisted foliation is plainly planted on the bell shape, growing from nothing, supporting nothing, and apparently ready to drop ofl, as there is no reason why it should be left f . . historic ornament. § there. in fig. the vine is of a clinging character and would naturally appear to attach itself to the capital, although it does not appear to grow naturally out of the shaft of the column in the manner characteristic of the foliage of the early english capitals. in fig. the folia- tion. is not only of no particular character, but it is simply ' “stuck on " with no origin and no struc- tural relation and con- veys no idea of fitness or propriety. in the running bands and moldings we find the same characteristics as those of england, but not so pure in form. in fig. the foli- ated forms, it will be observed, appear to be attached to and grow from the top and bot- tom members of the molding. the line of f‘g- * their growth is curved toward the center of the molding, but, at the same time, follows the line of the mold- ing itself and appears continuous with it; while in the rayonnant period, as shown in fig. , the molding is divided up in sec~ tions more like the perpendicular period of england, and the leaves, though growing apparently from the stonework beneath them, are nevertheless stiff and 'illill'lfl'l’w ' i, ‘ ‘ " g . ,.- . i'l‘ih . ' ' i r ’ .f ' v i i i" i' . v : . . ... '.‘ ,. hilv'li/i'ii.=@ fig. . § historic ornament. geometrical and do not appear to belong to the surface on which they are placed. a characteristic of the flamboyant style is seen in fig. , where the guiding stern of the ornament that is carved on the molding is in some places clear from the molding itself, and though it shows great skill in the carving, exhibits little art in the design. the leaves and floral forms are twisted so that their ends repre- sent forked fiames, from which the period gets its name, and there is no structural relation be- tween the foliation and its moldings. . early french diapers divide the wall surface into geometrical forms in a manner similar to that in england, and stenciled within these figures are characteristic devices typical of the nation and the style. in fig. we have a wall divided intolozenge shapes by diagonal lines, within some of which flr'urs-dc-lis are sten- ciled in gilt on a blue ground, while a simple foliated outline is sten- ciled within the others on a gold ground. in fig. is shown a more complicated de sign based on the inter- section of a number of circles whose centers historic ornament. § are found at the intersections of evenly spaced vertical and horizontal lines. in this case, the ground of the decoration is pink, and the outlines of the subdivision and the stenciled forms within them are in gold. . the character of surface treatment in the rayon- nant period is best shown in fig. , which is from an illuminated manuscript. the lines of the foliage and the fig. . geometrical rendering of the flowers are characteristic of this style of work, and the twisted forms are suggest- ive of the change that - is taking place toward the flamboyant period. in fig. is shown another example from illuminated manuscript, where the naturalistic treatment of the flower, with the foliage reduced to a flame-like outline, shows the systematic ren- dering of all work of this period. § historic ornament. ‘ . german-gothic details.—germa.n-gothic de- talls were influenced more largely by france, but, at the same time, borrowed ideas direct from england. fig. shows a wall diaper divided into circles somewhat after the manner of the english example shown in fig. , within which geometrical forms are stenciled in some cases, while in others the conventional brush form of the eagle, emblem- atic of germany, is rendered in light green on a darker ground of the same color. . mlsinterpretatlon of g thic.—as the term “gothic " as applied to architecture is, in the minds of most persons, associated almost entirely with ecclesiastical edifices, we are all likely to labor under the impression that the medieval cathedrals were the only structures built during these dark ages. as a matter of fact, however, every build- ing erected during the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, throughout western europe, was built in what we now call the gothic style. in order that we may better understand this domestic architecture and its details, from which much of our ornament at the present day has descended, it will be necessary for us to look into the habits, customs, methods of living, and government of the people at this period. kings, princes, earls, and even the lesser nobility, all lived in castles during this period, and these structures form a most important part of the architecture, as they are undoubt- edly the prototype of the modern dwelling house from which have descended all those details of house plan that modern requirements have brought into service. . feudal systerfm—at this time all lands were held under what is known as the feudal system. when the tribes from the north had conquered rome and overrun the entire roman empire, the generals or chiefs of the different military organizations were given lands for themselves and their subjects over which they ruled as kings and princes. this system existed throughout all europe, but with slightly varying conditions in italy, france, germany, and england, - historic ornament. § according to the influences of each locality. the general principle was the same, however, and we will confine our dis- cussion simply to the effect of this system in france, inas- much as it reached a most thorough organization there, and had a more marked influence on the subsequent art of the period of the renaissance. the political organization of a country under the feudal system consisted in the bulk of the land being divided into states called fisz, which were held by their owners on the condition that they should, when called on, perform certain military duties to their superiors or pay them fees in grain, wines, cattle, etc., and in default of such service or payment, the land could be reclaimed. the superior lord might be the king of the realm, or some nobleman that held a feudal tenure from the king, and who in turn created fiefs by and under his own personal rule. an important detail of the old feudal law was the fact that - the king or superior lord, from whence comes the modern term landlord, was entitled to the fealty of his own tenants, but not to that of his subordinate tenants, every man looking for rule and discipline only to his own immediate lord and master. it therefore frequently happened that one of these noblemen would build up a community so powerful as to feel practically independent of his king, and therefore refuse to render to his superior such military service as was demanded. the result of this was inevitably the same—war between the king and his subject. on the other hand, if the subject remained loyal to his king, he was likely to depend on the royal influence and encroach somewhat upon the fief of some one of his feudal neighbors. this would bring about the same result—war between two feudal barons. and even if he remained within his own territory and was true to his sovereign, the prosperity of his fief or his influence with the royal court was sure to excite the jealousy of some one of the surrounding nobles and bring about war. it would thus appear that the feudal barons were at war with one another a large part of the time, and these frequent § historic ornament. wars required that the medieval castle should‘be a military post from necessity and a domestic household for convenience. during the war the castle was the stronghold of the lord and his retainers, and during peace it was a house of entertain- ment for his guests and vassals. . castle of’coucy.—in fig. is shown a plan of the castle of coucy, near laon, france, the irregular outline of which is due to the fact that military engineering required that these structures should conform as nearly as possible to the top of the hill, on ,: which they were usually ii built, thereby rendering a“ it impracticable to storm the fortress from more than one side—that on which the entrance was located, a large tower, or keep —in the french castles called the donjon — guarded this main en- trance and at the same time served as a strong- hold and point of last resort in case other por- tions of the castle should fall into the hands of invaders. the clonjon of coucy was feet in height and feet in diameter, and the walls were feet thick at the f'g' ‘ base. the uppermost of its three stories was the largest, as the walls were thinner at the top, and , men could be here assembled in a circular room and receive their instruc- tions for the military routine of the day. in the middle story was the family apartment for use during siege, and in . historic ornament. § the basement were storerooms for sufficient provisions to last , men over a year. the keep was surrounded on the outside by a moat, or water-filled ditch, shown at a, beyond which was a large enclosure shown at a, called the outer bailey. this was a large piece of cultivated land and contained the chapel r and the stables s. the interior courtyard a' was called the inner bailey and was the only outdoor area open to the garrison in time of siege. these points are of interest, as from them are developed many details that are characteristic of the modern house in plan, while other details 'of more decorative value had their origin in devices originally invented for purely military purposes. . in fig. is shown a bird’s-eye view of the castle of coucy and the surrounding country. around the top of each of its five towers will be observed small projections that carry an enclosed gallery. the spaces between these pro- jections, or corbels, as they were called, were open through the floor of this overhanging gallery, and, in time of siege, when the walls of the castle were surrounded by sappers and miners endeavoring to disintegrate the stonework and gain access to the interior, deadly missiles were shot straight down from the floor of the gallery, or quantities of boiling oil or molten lead were used to make the base of the walls as unapproachable as possible. the windows in the castle all opened on the inner bailey, no openings being permitted toward the outside except small loopholes of‘ suflicient size only to shoot an arrow through. the tops of the individual walls enclosing the inner bailey were notched, and the rectangular sections of wall between the notches—called battlements—each con- tained a large loophole, as may be seen in the perspective view at j. behind these battlements was a platform on which archers could stand and shoot at an invading force, while a similar treatment of the top of the walis around the outer bailey enabled the besieged to defend the outer bailey § historic ornament. against the besiegers before finally retiring within the castle walls for safety. all these details were altered from time to time, as civil- ization advanced, and when the invention of gunpowder w. . n l '.!' "~u\_,, ‘_ \ ‘ ' i 'i ~'“. "-‘ ' gk - \ ~ . . w.’ zqurrvrfi‘.l.'_.r ffi~_ . \:.\<\'. :.'~ e - s“ t " &“$~ \ ‘ < \ ' ‘> - \ \ ‘ ' _. _ if!“ \ \i. . iii: l; . ‘ \"' .. ‘ - - ~~._/‘-_ . . . ,ra-l‘n - 'gmf'm: ~ .a‘§'°‘~“ "j*“*~$;'\k*.-._ “’k \ rl - . _/". .- ' ' e-r' '-j.r~\' v _ v. l v! ’~v" j ’ —v ' i ‘ . _~fi'_ historic ornament. § . mode of living in ancient castles—regard- ing domestic life within these castle walls, it is well to remember that, previous to the fourteenth century, there was not much subdivision in the household apartments even of royalty, the king and queen and the servants and retainers all usually occupying one room, known as the great hall. this great hall is shown in the plan at , and was to the domestic part of the household what the donjon was to the military— the main apartment wherein all household duties were per- formed. here the lord sat at his meals with his family, his guests, and his retainers; here he' transacted all business of the day, both financial and domestic; and here in the earliest times he slept at night on a rough couch at one end. by degrees, society began to improve and become more refined, and the constant daily association with servants and soldiers becoming undesirable, the great hall was divided into two apartments, one of which was known as the will“ drawing roovi, where the lord and his family could retire after meals, but the hall was still retained for business and dining purposes. however, a further subdivision provided another room for the transaction of business, which was still called the lmll, but in distinction the remaining portion was called the dining lzall. these three rooms—the hall, the dining hall, and the withdrawing room—were the principal apartments in the house or castle, and, consequently, the sep- arate sleeping apartments, which advanced ideas demanded, were crowded into any out-of-the-way corner that circum- stances afforded. for this reason, these sleeping rooms were often dark, cheerless apartments, and were designated by the term chamber—a word derived from the latin, mean- ing a dark vault—and finally, when the bedstead was intro¢ duced as an article of household furniture, the sleeping rooms were called bad chambers, to designate them from other rooms in the castle of similar character but not for sleeping purposes. . heating of ancient castles—in the earliest days, the castle was heated by an immense fire-grate located § historic ornament. in the center of the room, the smoke from which passed through openings in the roof called louvars. subsequently, this grate was removed from the center to the side wall, and the louver was replaced by a chimney stack. this neces- sitated a separate chimney for each room, and is responsible for the fact that nearly every french chateau built in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries bristles with beautifully designed chimney stacks above the roof, and nearly every room in the french chateau of the renaissance period pos- sesses a fireplace and a distinctively designed mantel. . iieraldry.—another point of this feudal system is the subject of heraldry, which is of vast importance in its relation to historic ornament, inasmuch as it is based entirely on that important characteristic of all ornament, namely, symbolism. it is doubtless true that armorial bear- ings were not in much general use until the twelfth century, when they were brought into prominence by the crusades—a term given to those wars waged by the christians of western europe against the mohammedans around jerusalem for the purpose of rescuing the holy sepulcher from the hands of infidels. ' the purpose of heraldic devices was to designate one per- son from another, as surnames did not exist in those days; and though the painted device by which the savage sets forth his personality may be considered as heraldic as the device borne on the shield of a soldier, it is with the latter class that we have to do in ornamental design. we have seen in egyptian art evidences of heraldry, inasmuch as the two serpents flanking the sun disk of the winged globe are symbols of upper and lower egypt, and, therefore, heraldic. but with the twelfth century, we arrive at a system of heraldry whereby the heraldic device was passed down from generation to generation, in the same manner that the family name is transmitted at the present day. a heraldic device would be transmitted from father to son, on the death of the former, with few alterations, so that in our study of the history of subsequent styles, we can historic ornament. § locate and date many details by our familiarity with the insignia associated with certain royal families. . the fleur-de-lls.—the fleur-de-lz': has ever been emblematic of france, because hugh capet, the first french king, carried it on his shield as the insignia of his family, and subsequent rulers used this same emblem as an indica- tion of royalty, while they coupled with it some other device to more clearly establish their own personality. in subse- quent periods, as we shall see, the initial letter was fre- quently used by royalty on works of art erected by them during the period of their reign; but this is not of so much importance to us as the helaldic devices, as several sover- eigns of the same name ruled many years apart. the importance of these heraldic devices cannot be overestimated, as will be pointed out when we study the ornament of the subsequent periods in the renaissance. historic ornament. (part .) renaissance art. introduction. . orlgln.-—alth ugh the medieval style of art and architecture prevailed throughout all europe for at least six centuries, it is still a,difficult matter to draw a line at certain dates when the influence of the ancient classic art utterly ceased and the .revival of that classic art after the medieval period took place. in fact, if the two subjects were studied separately and independently, it is not unlikely that traces of revival of classic art could be discovered even before the classic style itself had become extinct. it must be borne in mind that italy, in the extreme southern part of europe, was the seat of the original roman government, and the country wherein the classic style devel- oped to its greatest voluptuousness. the roman people spread all over civilized europe and established their monu- ments everywhere, but no place so profusely as in italy itself. after the conquest of rome by the barbarous hordes from the north, the latin-speaking people were largely confined to the italian peninsula, and though a new style of architec- ture was developed by the conquering race—a style since derisively termed gothic by the artists of the renaissance § for notice of the copyright. see page immediately following the title page. historic ornament. § period—the original romans at home still endeavored to adhere to their ancient traditions and styles of art. if this point is thoroughly understood, there will be no difficulty in tracing the progress of renaissance art from italy through- out europe. we have seen that the farther north we go from the site of the roman empire, the purer was the style of the gothic art that prevailed, inasmuch as it was less hampered by the tradition of classic art. . revlval of classic style. now, when it comes to a revival of the classic style, it is not strange that that revi- val should take place first in italy, where the gothic style never secured a prominent foothold, that the revival should spread from italy to france—a people made up largely of latin extraction—and that, lastly, it should extend from france to england, but in a very imperfect form, as the english people were not latins and had no sympathy with, nor tie to, the original latin style. bear in mind also that the celtic ornament, of which we have studied, originated among the earlier inhabitants of the british isles and natu- rally influenced any importation from a strictly foreign coun- try, as was italy. . seope of renaissance perlod.—in describing renaissance art, we will commence at the period of its infancy and continue under this heading down to the present day, inasmuch as there has been no new style evolved and no revival of any other style that need break this term of continuity. moreover, it will not be inadvisable for us to set a period or character of the renaissance style that theo- retically may be considered the best, and, in doing this, we must consider all the influences that are brought to bear. . intention of renalmnce artists.—the efiort of the renaissance artists was not to invent a new style. nor to bring about through a transition a development based on classic lines, but to deliberately copy the monuments of pagan rome and greece and use these heathen forms, no matter how inappropriate or illy suited for the purpose of § historic ornament. modern christian art. they were different from anything they had ever seen or conceived; they were the products of an age cf wonderful art and literary advancement, and, in the eyes of the renaissance artists, were accepted as supe- rior to anything they could themselves devise. . renaissance art in italy—the style of renais- sance we find in italy, where gothic art had its slightest influence, naturally adheres as closely as possible to the old roman forms, for there they had the old roman buildings, many of them still intact, that could be copied line for line. the invasion of italy by charles viii of france, toward the close of the fifteenth century, brought into the latter country examples of this revived italian art that were much admired by the french public, and the revival of classic art was immediately felt throughout france. devoid of actual buildings from which they could study their designs, the french artists were compelled to go to italy and study, and french kings imported italian artists to do work in and around paris. either experiment was bound to produce an altered style. . introductlon into france.-—the french artist had been working in the gothic style, and he studied the italian monuments with an idea of medieval construction in his mind. the italian artist came to france possibly with a clearer idea of classic art, but was hampered in his execution by the necessity of employing workmen that had cut stone in no other style than that which had prevailed during the six centuries of the middle ages. an even compromise can therefore be considered to have taken place between the perfect construction of the gothic style and the perfect pro- portion of the classic art. . introduction into england.—the introduction of renaissance into england, however, was far different. true, her artists studied the styles under great italian masters at rome, but they, too, had to compete with designers in the local school, where gothic art had secured its strongest historic ornament. § foothold. germany and holland before this had adopted the renaissance style from france, and the systematic patience of the germans and the phlegmatic immobility of the h - lander are well woven into the style of classic art they reproduced. when these perverted ideas were transmitted to england, it is easily understood that they contained few details that could be considered purely classic. by a suc- cessive alteration through several countries, they could be with difficulty identified with their original type. . purity. of french style—we may therefore con- sider that in france we find the best examples of a practical adaptation of the ancient classic ornament to modern condi- tions and purposes, while in italy we find a renaissance of classic art that adheres more closely to the classic style, but can hardly be considered even a new departure. in eng- land, however, the style that was developed in the renais- sance period is not classic at all, except in its derivation, and there, after repeated endeavors to apply the inappropriate forrhs to the modern purposes, the style was abandoned and an endeavor made to revive that of the medieval period. italian renaissance. . rlgin.—fragments of exquisite beauty in stone, bronze, and marble were hardly covered over by the top of the soil in the ruins of the ancient buildings of rome, and these buildings therefore became quarries from which stone was easily obtained and recut to be used for tombs and other buildings wherein the style of art for which they were origi- nally used played no part. this accounts largely for the fact that gothic art secured so little foothold in italy and remained for so short a time. the pointed arch was introduced in the northern part of italy early in the thirteenth century, and this might be considered the planting of the seed of gothic art in this territory; but almost at the same time there was a protest historic ornament. § . publication of vitruvius.—through these illus- trations, which display a study on the part of the artist of ancient art, types of ornament geometrically opposed to those of the middle ages were disseminated over the continent of europe; and, in , the publication of the architecture of vitruvius at venice, with illustrations of the classic orders of architecture, set a final seal upon the fate of matters in art and afforded the means of spreading throughout other countries those details of ancient design that had so engaged the art public of italy. . italian aversion to gothic forms—however, before those laborers that were endeavoring to bring classic art and literature to the front had succeeded in getting the least sign of encouragement, it was apparent that the italians did not take kindly to gothic forms. the acanthus leaf was typical of italian art, and the foliated capitals of the gothic school had to accept this form of vegetation. in its earliest stage, renaissance art in italy was really a revival of classic principles, and it was not until the middle of the fifteenth century that it could be considered an actual revival of style. . roman influences—at rome the great wealth of the italian princes and the great ecclesiastical works under- taken by' successive pontiffs of the church attracted to that city the highest procurable ability in the art world, and it is for that reason that we can still find in rome, in the various palaces and churches, the most exquisite fragments of deco- rative sculpture in detail. . donatello.—one of the most interesting qualities of this style of ornament is the skill with which those by whom it has been wrought have availed themselves of a variation of light and shade by the treatment of the surfaces on which the ornament is raised. the refined appreciation of the delicate shades of relief in sculptured ornament was carried out with the greatest perfection by donatello, an artist whose authority on matters of art was held in the § historic ornament. highest esteem by the people of florence, and whose example was followed by all classes of artists. he was the first to practice the true basso rilicr/o, by which the effect of projection and of rounded molding is obtained within what would appear to be impracti- cable limits of relief; that is to say, in modeling his orna- ment on surface, it was raised but slightly above the surface but was treated in its carving so as to appear in high relief. donatello then combined this style of work with mrsso rilie'z/o and alto rilievo, the former being a half relief, and the latter being a sunken ornament below the surface on which it was executed. this combination maintained a division of the subject of his design into several planes. donatello enriched many of his .ornaments with elements derived from the art of painting. . plane system. at the zenith of its perfection, this system of regular arrangement of ornament in planes was so ingeniously managed in position of light and shade that, when viewed from a distance, the relief presented only cer- tain points symmetrically disposed with some dominating geometrical figure. an approach of a few yards served to bring to the eye lines and details connecting the points of greatest importance, and a still nearer approach revealed the leafage of the delicate tendrils that were required to convey a tangible idea of the type of nature selected for the conven- tionalized design. and beyond this, no inspection could be too close a test of the artist’s perfect appreciation of the refinements of surface texture. . characteristics—in the hands of less profoundly impressed artists than donatello—those possessing an inferior sensevof the proper limit of convention in sculpture—the introduction of pictorial elements in the has relief design soon degenerated into realism and confuston. great as was the skill of ghiberti, the effect of many of his most graceful compositions was marred by the introduction of perspective historic ornament. § effect and accessories too servilely copied from nature. in many of the ornaments of sculpture, this fault is exagger- ated until the dignity of the design is lost in the frivolity of the detail. these monuments, decked with huge garlands of flowers, hung with heavy cartouches and tablets, and fan- cifully overgrown with foliage, appeared more as examples of the artisan's skill than works of art commemorative of the date or dedicated to sacred purposes. this is somewhat illustrated in fig. l, which is a part of a cornice taken from the palazzo vecchio, or town hall, of florence, italy. this also illustrates the minutia of detail ;; fl : ~~ "psi- , % “ i . *../_:y\'l\l'\ t‘ ( " l'..jl" ' '.' . - .._ ,, . g, “. - "‘j“ ' ‘ " —\~~u~\.\.sa‘u~ us ,. . ..‘a. , - f. ' .- we tar-m. "a; '. - _ ._ ~ '- \‘nv' u . , l ' "j. ‘ . i s - historic ornament. § undoubtedly in that irrepressible tendency of roman orna- ment to end its scrolls each time in a flower. the propor- tioning of the ornament to the surface in this case, however, is much more moderate and refined than in the roman- corinthian capital, and though copied after the classic model, this is certainly an improvement on it. . follated terminations.-—-in fig. is shown a portion of a cornice suppprted on pilasters around the door- way in the same church. the treatment of the frieze shows its origin in roman ornament, but the introduction of the fig. . human figure and birds with foliated terminations reminds us again of the innovations made by the renaissance artists. observe that all surface is here ornamented, that every molding is cut to break up an appearance of continuous line and cast‘an irregular shadow, and that the surfaces, such as the top of the pilaster and its capital and the panels in the frieze just referred to, all have their decorations properly proportioned and in keeping with the position they occupy, § historic ornament. in fig. is shown another cornice from the same church, the design of which follows more closely the ancient classic model. the ornament on the frieze is carved in high relief and does not possess that easy flowing feeling that is seen in the previous example. the same may be said of the . f e ' p..." email-mm i!» mi- i, moldings on the pilaster that supports the cornice, and of the capital of this pilaster. the ornament is too thick and there is not sufficient blank surface to rest the eye from this abundance of detail, thereby giving the whole design a feel- ing of unrest that was more characteristic of the extravagant historic ornament. § corinthian order of the romans than the more refined hand“ lings of italian art. ' in fig. is shown a bracket that forms a detail of the pulpit in the church of st. croce, in florence, the treatment of the decoration of which is well worthy of study. the ornament is not excessive and well fills the surface where it is "inf-£ l~ ‘j--::' y _.a".' ' fig. . placed, and the leafwork is carved in low relief and does not possess that excessive surface molding that so materially detracts from some of the work of the later renaissance. . examples of venetian renaissance—in fig. is a bracket from the ducal palace at venice, and is charac- teristic of the style of the venetian renaissance. the scrollwork and treatment of the foliage in this bracket is particularly happy, and illustrates, more clearly than any example we have had, the obedience to those laws of nature that must be observed in all good ornament: radiation from the parent stem, tangential curvature of lines, and distribu- tion of areas. the latter rule is particularly well shown in § historic ornament. this by the gradual diminution in surface occupied by the running ornament as it extends into the extremities of the triangular panel. the scrollwork under the bracket is not so artistically formed or well proportioned, but errors here _ are amply balanced by the good points of the scroll. in fig. is shown a panel from a large candelabrum that gives a very clear idea of the treatment of venetian arabesques. the panel is symmetrical on each side of a center line, carved in high relief in stone, and is treated in vv ‘ ' ‘ w~ -v ‘ ‘vv \ moa\_ ~..~ .uv war fig. . a manner that makes the ornament somewhat monotonous in itself but well proportioned to the surface it is intended to cover, with enough blank space to prevent tiresomeness in its study. i . ingenuity of renaissance designer. fig. is a panel under the balustrade of the stairs in the cathedral at sienna. this illustrates to a remarkable degree the inge- nuity and fertility of mind possessed by the early renais- sance designer and sculptor. here we have, forming the historic ornament. § running border around a trapezoidal panel, the guilloche ornament so characteristic of classic art, and the running arabesque identified with the classic-revival period; within this a modified form of the old greek fret and then an irreg- ular panel, the surface of which is carved in low relief with a foliated scroll and arabesque that close study discovers is terminated at one end in a grotesque animal and at the other in a bunch of fruit. . renaissance ironwork.—n t only was art at this period exemplified in details carved in stone and marble, modeled in stucco and painted on canvas, but the iron worker executed many details that brought his trade almost to a fine art. fig. shows a bracket from the florence museum, rep- resentative of a cornucopia filled with grapes and leaves. § historic ornament. the treatment of the scrollwork and the elaboration of all the detail of this device is peculiarly well adapted to the fro. . ..__ -. ‘. ' " . ‘.“-:fl - p _. "i"; v ’ n . \-, ._. ._ purpose, and altogether this exhibits a remarkable design for a piece of work of this kind. in fig. is shown a portion of an iron grille from the cathedral at prato, one portion of which, based on the com- binations of the circle, shows a slight leaning toward gothic ideals, while the panel to the right is strictly renaissance in the treatment of its leafwork and small figures; but the historic ornament. § general direction of its outline, with its alternate branches to the left and right, undoubtedly have their origin in the gothic school of foliation. it must be borne in mind that at this period there was no fig. . separation in the branches of the art world. a man was architect, painter, and sculptor at once, and often combined these with the trade of goldsmith. the great artist raflael designed ornaments for carvers in stone and metal, and exhibited in them the purest taste and most exquisite fancy. § historic ornament. . michael angelo, sculptor and artist—michael angelo was born in and was a pupil of domenico ghirlandajo. having shown at an early age a strong talent for sculpture, he was given an opportunity to study in a school for the culture of sculpture founded by lorenzo de medici. the medici family was banished from florence when angelo was years of age, and the young sculptor ‘ ..~ >-~ a .n i" ' , z" ,. was forced to retire to bologna, where he worked for a while on the tomb of st. domini. he returned to florence, how- ever, and about the time of his twenty-third birthday finished his celebrated statue of cupid, and also his bacchus, which were the cause of his being invited to rome. at rome, among many other works by him, is the pieta now standing in st. peter's church. his gigantic statue of historic ornament. § david, at florence, was his next great achievement, and before he was years of age he was summoned to rome by pope julius ii for the purpose of designing his mauso- leum, for which building the famous statues of “moses” and “the slaves ” were originally designed. thus far the work of michael angelo has apparently been that of a sculptor, with possibly the exception of the design of the mausoleum. his next great work, howcver, was the painting of the sistine chapel—one of the greatest of his achievements, whether we regard it purely as a work of intrinsic art or as a monument that exercised a powerful influence both on the art of a contemporary character as well as that of later times. for pope paul iii, in , he completed his vast fresco “the last judgment " in the same chapel, and the remainder of his long life was chiefly devoted to the con- struction of st. peter's church, on which he was employed at the time of his death, in , and for which he refused any remuneration. during the long life of michael angelo, everything he executed expressed a desire for novelty, and this is the only detraction he ever seemed to have from the study of pure excellence. his daring innovations in ornament are most striking. his large broken pediments and moldings, his sweeping consoles and scrolls, his direct imitation of nature in some of his enrichments, and the amount of absolutely plain surface that he uniformly preserved in all his archi~ tectural compositions, seem to bring new elements into the field of design that were greedily snapped up by men of lesser genius than he himself possessed. thus the style of the roman school became materially altered through the work of michael angelo. subsequent artists, down even to vignola himself, so far as ornament was concerned, adopted all his beauties, and defects of design, the greatest of which were an exaggeration of manner. . giacopo tatti sansovlno.—venice seems to be the only city of italy that did not follow the style that was § historic ornament. set by michael angelo, and this was probably due to the fact that she had a hero of her own in giacopo tatti sansovino. this artist was born at florence in the year . having, at an early age, displayed a remarkable talent for art, he was properly educated and distinguished himself by his build- ings at florence. he was then taken to rome by san gallo, architect of pope julius ii, where he attracted the notice of bramante, and made, under bramante’s direction, a large wax model of the laocoon, in competition with other artists. sansovino‘s was judged to be the best, and a bronze cast was taken of it that finally came into the possession of cardinal lorraine and by him was taken to france in the year . sansovino was obliged to leave rome on account of his health, and was placed by bramante with the artist peru- gino, who was then painting the ceiling in the toore borgia. perugino was so pleased with sansovino's ability that he caused him to prepare many models for his own use. in the year , most elaborate preparations were being made at florence for the entry of pope leo x, and sanso- vino was employed in the preparation for designs of many triumphal arches and statues. the works were so success- ful that he was given the commission by the pope to make a design for the facade of san lorenzo, in florence. after this he continued in rome and was employed both in sculp- ture and architecture, and was the successful competitor for the church of st. john, of the florentines, against raffael and antonio san gallo. from this on he was engaged on work of importance in rome until the year , when rome was taken by the french, and sansovino sought refuge in venice, intending from there to visit france, where the king had offered him employment. the duke andrea gritti, however, persuaded him to remain and undertake the restoration of the cupolas of st. mark's church—a work that he performed so successfully that he was appointed to a public office, given a house, and provided with a stipend. it was to this appointment that venice owes so many architectural monuments that are among the finest examples of italian art. historic ornament. § french renaissance. . rapidlty of transltlon.—the transition from the style of the middle ages to the style of the renaissance, that. took place so gradually in italy, was in france sudden and complete. the campaigns of charles viii, louis xii, and francis i in italy brought them in contact with the wonder- ful art productions of that country, and filled them on their return to france with an ambition to rival the splendid palaces and gardens of italy, for which purpose they took with them italian artists to act as instructors to the french. however, although these imported italians introduced many classic elements and details into french art, they failed to dominate the natural spirit of the french master masons and architects in matters of general composition. there- fore, the early french renaissance is wholly unlike that of italy, from which it derived only a few minor details and the impetus that carried it forwards. on account of its possession of greater originality than the italian style, and its freedom from the baser incongruities that prevailed in the renaissance in germany and england, we can take the french' style as a good standard, and study it as a revival of classic art modified almost perfectly to fit more modern ideas. it is important in studying the french renaissance to bear in mind the periods into which it is divided and sub- divided, and also to bear in mind the dates of these periods. in modern practice, when any designs are executed in any particular style, the french styles more than any others are rated according to their period rather than nationality. . periods of french renalssance.—french renais- sance may be divided into three general periods: ( ) valois period, or renaissance proper; ( ) bourbon, or classic, period; and ( ) rococo period. . valois period—the valois period extends from (about the time of the invasion of charles viii into italy) to (about the end of the reign of henry iii). this may be subdivided into: (a) the transition period, comprising le-p historic ornament. the reigns of charles viii and louis xii and the early years of francis i, extending from to . this period is characterized by a picturesque mixture of classic details and gothic ideas. ( ) the style of francis i, or early renaissance, extending from about to . the ornament of this period is distinguished by its great variety and grace of composition and the exquisite beauty of detail. (c) the advanced renaissance, combining the reigns of henry ii, francis ii, charles ix, and henry iii, extend- ing from to , and distinguished by the general adoption of the classic proportions in the orders and a decline in the delicacy and originality in the treatment of the orna- ment. in other words, this period represents, as did the later renaissance of italy, an attempt to actually reproduce all classic forms. . bourbon period. —this period of the renaissance extends from to , covering the reign of henry iv and of louis xiv. this may be subdivided into the style of henry iv, covering entirely his reign and part of the reign of louis xiii, extending altogether from to . the distinguishing characteristic of this period is the excessive use of the classic orders and other forms with a heavy, bold, florid ornament. the style of louis xiv begins during the reign of his predecessor and extends to the time of his death—from to . this is the great age of classic architecture in france, wherein the luxury and wealth of the nation and its desire for splendor exceeded its taste in art and represented in its architecture an attempt at the grandeur of rome. . rococo period—this period may be considered the decline, and is distinguished by the marked extravagance of detail derived from the leaf and other ornamental forms of previous periods, combined with rock and shell forms, so capricious as to be absolutely meaningless. this period of french renaissance terminates in what is known as the empire style. this consisted of a strong pro- test against the frivolity of the ornament of the rococo, and a returnvto the actual detail of more classic forms. as it historic ornament. § progressed into the nineteenth century, it expressed itself under the reign of napoleon, as emperor, and attempted to produce the grandeur of imperial rome. france had conquered the greater part of europe, and believed that she was to set up a universal empire covering the entire country, as rome had done, and with this idea in mind, built triumphal arches, columns of victory, gorgeous palaces, and country chateaux, and in every way lavished money on public and private monuments, in an endeavor to visibly express her imperialism. . castles and chateaux—the transition from the gothic to the renaissance is more clearly expressed in the chateaux, or country residences, of the nobles than in almost any other class of buildings,and for that reason we will confine our discussion largely to a few of these interesting edifices. we have seen how the castle of the middle ages was built mainly for defense, its ornamental features being merely an embellishment of the necessities that were prominent in its construction. such was exhibited in the general appear- ance of the castle of coucy, fig. , historic ornamml, § . § historic ornament. the remodeling of these gothic castles to suit the taste of the renaissance brought in many incongruous but very picturesque ideas. in fig. , a view of the castle of amy- le-rideau, it will be observed how the towers and turrets characteristic of the old style are retained, how the upper portions are still carried out on bold corbels, and their tops w out/ma plan of cha teau de l / v fig. . roofed over in a cone; but the drawbridgc, the meat, and the portcullis have disappeared. broad airy windows dimin- ish the extent of blank wall surface characteristic of feudal times, and pilasters each side of the windows, topped with classic capitals and carved in rich arabesque, show the adop- tion of italian art. the plan, composition, and grouping of the parts are still french and more or less feudal, and the italian art has only affected the detail. historic ornament. § . chateau de blois.—the largest, and, in many respects, the most important, of these country residences of royalty is the chateau de blois, and this we will consider in detail, as within it may be traced the gradual transition of each phase of the french renaissance, from the time of louis xii to the time of henry iv, thereby including the entire valois and a part of the bourbon period of this style. in fig. is shown a plan of this structure, the irregularity of which gives evidence of its medieval origin. about the year louis xii remodeled the east wing, which bears his name, a front view of which is shown in fig. . in this may be seen the elliptical arch, the clustered column, the § historic ornament. high-pointed gable, and the slender pinnacles whose origin can be traced to medieval days, but the introduction of flank- ing pilasters and arabesque ornament, though here but spar- ingly seen, is suggestive of the change to come. on the outside of this wing, the archway that leads through to the “court of honor," shown in fig. , is flanked on each ' " side by heavy piers, over which is a conventional gothic niche wherein, against an elaborate background of fleur-de-lis, rides king louis xii on his charger. to the right of this is a little doorway that gives the pedestrian access to the passage, and over this entrance, in has-relief, is carved a porcupine, the emblem of 'louis xii, and a knotted cord for anne of brittany, his queen. of these‘emblems pm , we will have more to say later. we will now turn to the wing of francis . on the north- west side of the court. this was erected but fifty years after the one we have just considered, but the difference in style is manifest even to the most casual observer, as shown in fig. . . french conception of roman ideas—the artists of the sixteenth century, hurried along by the swift current of fifty years of wonderful intellectual regeneration, seemed to arrive at a comprehension of the use that the romans had made of the greek orders. they seemed to understand that ' the orders were not used in rome as elements of construc- tion, as they had been in- greece, but as decorative details having no essential relation to the construction itself. they seemed to comprehend by instinct that there was no reason why they should not take those same roman orders and details and use them in any way they chose—structural or historic ornament. § non-structural—so long as their use suited the purpose to which they were applied. fig. . thus a study of this period of french architecture shows that the french builders accepted not the conventional § ' historic ornament. restrictions of the classic formulas, but the spirit of -these formulas, as an organized system of ornamentation. a study of the court facade of this chateau de blois shows that the lessons in classic styles given by the imported italian mas- ters were accepted by the french architects with respect and intelligence, but not learned by rote. the italian rules had an influence, but were not accepted as a law. . octagonal stalrcnse.—the greatest artistic effort of this period was probably the octagonal staircase that - appears in this facade. it is considered one of the master- pieces of the sixteenth century, though itis at the same time an example illustrative of the audacious independence of the french architect. it has no architectural relation to the wall surface from which it'protrudes, except that its four great free-standing buttresses support a cornice and balus- tradc that are a continuation of those on the wall. these buttresses are niched and contain exquisitely carved figures, while between them extends the balustrade of the stairs, historic ornament. § divided into panels carved with the crowned salamander emblematic of francis i, and in other places with the mono- gram f and c under a crown, standing for francis, and claude, his queen. in fig. is shown a large detail of this salamander device, and the form of its crown, decorated with fleur-de-lis. this fig. . is the key of the period and style, as was the crowned porcu- pine aikey to the style of louis xii. the fleur-de-lis will be found on nearly every detail connected with french royalty, as it was adopted originally by hugh capet, the first king of france. § historic ornament. if we now go into this castle and wander through its rooms, we will find many details typical of the spirit of the french people and suggestive of their love of display and art. we will be able to judge largely the period of each particular room by the emblems characteristic of the reign. fm. ' . . development of the fireplace.—it was about the beginning of the renaissance period that the chimney as a means of carrying % the smoke was introduced into france, and in the chateau de blois we see the full develop- ment of the fireplace. therefore it will be well to make a historic ornament. § study of these details by themselves, inasmuch as the student can then make a better comparison. . in fig. is shown an old mantel that stood at the end of the great hall of the states general. its design is gothic in feeling, as is plainly shown by the crockets around its cornice. the columns either side of the opening are carved with gothic capitals, and the ornament extending across the top of the opening is gothic in its detail, though indicative of the influence of the renaissance arabesque. in fig. is shown a mantel of the hall of the guards, the details each side of the opening of which, as well as the panel across the top of the opening and the frame panel over the mantel, are certainly gothic in feeling. the pilasters at each side of the mantel, however, and the capitals-at their tops, are certainly of italian origin and design. these two examples, particularly fig. , give a good idea of the earliest ornamental mantel used in french art, and are typical of the designs in use at the close of the fifteenth century. . heraldry.—in fig. is shown the mantel known as the mantle of crowns, on which in high relief we find the crowned porcupine emblematic of louis xii, together with the crowned initials l and a, standing for louis and anne of brittany, his queen. around the frieze is a knotted cord that also is emblematic of anne of brittany, and in later years was used by some queens as a sign of widowhood. the dolphin forming the background of this mantel, and bearing the crown of france, appears as a detail in many french designs emblematic of heirship to the throne, the nearest heir to the throne in france being called the dauphin—a word derived from the dolphin, that fish being the emblem. another interesting detail in this design is found above and below the knotted cord, around the frieze; above is the conventional fleur-de-lis emblematic of the kings of france, and below it is the conventional form of ermine emblematic of the queen, anne of brittany. § historic ornament. in fig. is shown another mantel from the chateau de blois, of the period of louis xii, in which the crowned por- cupine and the crowned ermine are each displayed in sepa- rate panels, the ermine in this case being shown as a complete animal instead of the conventional form representingits fur, fla. !. as displayed in the previous figure. the moldings of this mantel and its general outline and proportions are strongly suggestive of the gothic style, but the treatment of the arabesque at each side of the panels, the carving of the three-quarter columns that mark the separate panels, and the frieze over the fireplace, show conclusively their italian historic ()rnament. § origin. it will be observed that the initials l and a are. repeated across the top of the chimney, and the background of the panels containing the reliefs of the porcupine and n x a a a) ‘ ‘._. y'_ dais .. * ; ermine are each diapered with the fieur-de‘lis and conven- tional form of ermine fur. . in fig. we have another mantel of this same period, where the frieze over the top of the fireplace opening is evenly divided between the crowned initials of the king and queen, on a fleur-de-lis and ermine background, typical of their houses or families. the crowned porcupine between § historic ornament. the two—the symbol 'of louis xii—appears in nearly all designs executed during the reign of that king. above the fireplace are the figures of two angels, supporting the crown of france, and the shield bearing the escutcheons fig. . of both the king and queen. a little observation of the detail at the top, and the moldings of the columns, will show that the gothic influence still pervaded the art of the period. in fig. is a chimney with the emblems of anne of brittany. the elaborate a and knotted cords against a s historic ornament. § background of ermine, together with the entire treatment of the design, is suggestive only of the house of the queen, undivided with that of king louis. fig. shows a mantel wherein no initials occur to indi- cate to whom or what period it belonged; but we can easily fig. . judge from the presence of the knotted cord in each of the side panels, and the existence of this device as a border to the center panel, and its stenciled background of ermine and fleur-de-lis, over which the. shield surrounded with shells has been placed. ‘ § historic ornament. . in fig. is shown a mantel of the later period— that of francis i—a fact that is clearly declared by the pres- ence of the salamander in its design, a word concerning which might be necessary. the salamander is a mythical fig. . animal supposedly so cold blooded that it will actually quench fire when placed ~within it, and the design here shown expresses this idea of the salamander, standing on a bed of coals and surrounded by flame that he is supposed to quench by the coldness of his breath. historic ornament. § the details of this mantel are very classic. the capitals of the columns are derived undoubtedly from the italian renaissance. the acanthus leaf forming the bracket at the fig. . corners of the mantel, and the bracket over the crown, as a sort of clumsy keystone in the center, are decidedly italian in their molding. the mantel is chiefly interesting by its strong personality and association with the reign, period, and person of francis i. . in fig. is shown what is called the chimney of the fleur-de-lis, the upper background of which is stenciled § historic ornament. exclusively with fleur-de-lis, and bears in its center the crowned shield surrounded by shells. we now arrive at fig. , a mantel in a room known as the cabinet of the queen, and here we get the severe clas- sicism characteristic of the period of henry ii. the pilas- ters each side of the mantel, and the panels of the wall, all richly carved in arabesque, and the frieze over the top of the mantel, with similar ornament, show the predominating influence of italian art. the background of the upper portion of the mantel, with its stenciled h and fleur~de-lis, historic ornament. § and the oval cartouch or modillion in the center, with its crowned h surrounded by laurel leaves, stamp this design characteristically with the period of henry ii, while a small cartouch in the center of the mantel over the fireplace open- ing bears the initials h and c, standing for henry, and catherine de medici, his queen. the study of these designs and escutch- eons is of particular interest to the student, as nearly all detail of the french renaissance period can be classified easily by hearing in mind the heraldic sym- bols characteristic of each reign and period. . ' wall and cell- lng decoration—n less interesting than the mantels of this cele- brated chateau are the decorations of the walls and ceilings with the characteristic surface . ornament of the period. the same monograms and initials are here found in embossed leather, surrounded by richly foliated ornamentation in strong colors and gold. _ in fig. is shown a room known as the king’s chamber, the walls of which are decorated with a repeating pattern at regular intervals, within which we find the initials h and c, for henry and catherine, the king and queen. an enlarged detail of this wall decoration is shown in fig. , and is fig. . u historic ornament. valuable as a characteristic wall treatment of the period of this french renaissance. in fig. , the decorations of queen catherine’s chamber may be seen, and it is interesting to note that in each of . flo. historic ornament. § these rooms there is an abrupt termination between the wall decorations of the main room and the dado or wainscot of the niche or alcove, no attempt being made to blend the two fig. . patterns so that they die or fit into each other. the inde- pendence expressed is in perfect accordance with that already spoken of in the arrangement of the buttresses of the great staircase. ' § historic ornament. beyond this room, through the open doorway seen in fig. , is another apartment, the walls of which are treated fig. . with a surface decoration shown in fig. . the single letter h under the conventional crown indicates this apartment to historic ornameni‘. have been decorated in the period and style of henry ii, and a little study of the design in comparison with fig. will show the simplicity and neatness of the earlier style as fig. . compared with the later one. fig. shows a third example of the wall decorations of this chateau. these wall decorations are very valuable to the interior decorator of today, inasmuch as they furnish him with a § historic ornament. clear suggestion of the style of interior work during the renaissance period, of which so few examples are in exist- ence at the present time. fig. . . fontaineblean and versailles—during the decline of the renaissance to the period of the empire, the seat of government and the royal family were centered in paris, and the palaces of fontainebleau and versailles are the historic ornament. most important, with the exception of the louvre, of the many palaces of france. they are both built up of sections that vary in style and age from the fourteenth century to the present day, but in each 'of these parts the greatest architectural interest centers in the details of the period of francis i and his immediate successors. the details of this style of architecture, as seen in fon- tainebleau and versailles, are more urban than those from the chateaux we have just been considering, and, though all these buildings in their proper sense were palaces, yet the two structures in present consideration were always spoken of as such, inasmuch as they were the city residences of the king in distinction from his country seat. . variation of styles—in the rooms of these palaces can be seen the furniture and decorations whose style is typical of french art during each period of the renaissance and at the height of its glory. here, during the reigns of louis xv and louis xvi, we have the style of furniture characteristic of and known by the names of these monarchs, as well as that dainty specific style of design called jvlarie antoinrllo. after the year , french furniture can be roughly divided into four styles, corresponding to the four monarchs under whose influences its manufacture was car- ried on. these are: louis xiv, louis xv, louis xvi, and napoleon, usually called empire. as in all cases of subdivision into periods, there is a tran- sition from one period to another that makes the styles over- lap one another, and the distinctive characteristics of each cannot be applied with certainty. the dividing lines in the case of french furniture, however, are more clearly drawn than in other art details, inasmuch as each style seems to have been the result of a court fashion that depended largely on the taste of the reigning monarch. . louis xiv loved pomp and grandeur, and the forms of louis xiv furniture are bold and severe in line and pro- portion—a fact that kept them from appearing gaudy in § historic ornament. their excessive gilding. a great desire in furniture at this period was magnificence, and native woods were 'set aside in preference for foreign woods from india and america. rarity of material was of more importance than any other detail, and artistic composition was now relegated to an inferior place. the effect of this was to make the details small, as the use of costly materials required that they should be treated with care and that even the smallest fragments should be used. . introduction of costly materials—a great differ- ence was thus established between the old-fashioned joiner, faithful to the carving of native woods, and the eabinetmaker to the king, whose care was to produce objects of magnifi- cence. in other words, vulgarity was introduced into the scheme of ornament, and brilliant and costly materials were used solely ,for their expression of brilliancy and costliness; and it is from this standpoint that french furniture of this period must be regarded. the skill lavished upon it and the fancy and variety that characterizes its design and the minuteness of its workmanship in inlaid surfaces, graven and chiseled brasses, and the ingenuity of its construction and expense, can then be appreciated. . diseoumgement of symmetry.—during the period of louis xv, furniture loses the dignity of outline and proportion that characterized that of the previous style, although it possesses all the brilliancy and gaudiness of the former. another detail of importance between these two styles is that in the louis xiv work symmetry was not dis- tinctly observed, as the great effect of varied light and shade was enhanced by the abruptness of unsymmetrical parts. in the period of louis xv, this eccentricity became a law, and symmetry became not onlya detail of no consequence, but a thing not to be encouraged. this caused the design to reach the height of irregularity, and the style took the name of rococo—a term in the french language meaning frivolous. in this eccentric ornamentation other details figured, and historic ornament. § roses, cornucopia, vases, scrolls, etc. are interwoven with a great predominance of shell-like forms. there is nothing in the entire range of art acting as an example or prototype of this rococo idea. every shape and line throughout it is twisted and turned until it is almost a deformity; the ordinary acanthus scroll was carried into an endless reedy foliation. nature appeared to be looked upon as a rude and barbarous affair that needed some dressing of french taste, and yet some specimens of louis xv furniture impress us both with the actual skill of the man that did the work, whether in metal or wood, and that the pieces of furniture are themselves marvels of decoration. these twists and turns, though absolutely meaningless, seem to have an object. they reflect the light from gilded metal in a thousand different ways, and from a thousand different points, while the high relief affords an abundant play of light and shade amidst this brightness. toward the end of the reign of louis xv, a reaction set in against these absurdities, sim- .ply because the exaggerated style was being carried beyond reasonable limits. . under the'reign of louis xvi, the furniture is similar to that of his predecessor, inasmuch as the festoons, garlands, gildings, and shell decorations still exist, but the shape of the chair, and the care and study expended on it, is very different. refinement is evident in every one of its lines and proportions. the earlier chair, with sprawling legs—called the rancan—was not to be accepted during the reign of louis xvi, but to be departed from as widely as circumstances would permit. during this period, we find none of the bandy-legged forms of the chair and table characteristic of the previous style, but straight-turned and sometimes fluted shafts imitative of attenuated vases or cups, or suggestive of little columns or colonnettes. the gilding was used, not entirely over the surface, to increase the gaudy appearance, but in lines, to accentuate the fluting of the column-like legs more than to emphasize the curves of the moldings that were turned according to greek ideas. § historic ornament. . the entire interior decoration of this period par- took of a similar reformation. the panels of the rooms were divided into straight lines, and omitted all details of the rococo flourishes. these panels were painted white, and the pilasters between them were carved in rich and delicately executed arabesque. the whole scheme of decoration of this period was equally elaborate and rich with that of its predecessors, and various articles of furniture were made of tulip wood, laburnum, or of rosewood, and on other occasions they would be executed in lighter wood, colored in various gold and brown shades by means of a hot iron. the chief orna- ment was marquetry of elaborate pattern, usually in floral garlands with borders of fine diaper work. the chairs, beds, and couches were usually upholstered in fine gobelin tapestry or costly french and italian silks, all of which were further enriched by beautiful metal mounts, while inlaid bits of sevres porcelain added a delicacy to the whole. german and english renaissance. . influence of italian art.—renaissance ornament penetrated into germany at an early period, but was not particularly popular at first, and took no hold on the hearts of the people until the spread of books and engravings pre- pared the way to the adaptation. from an early period there had been a steady current of artists leaving germany to study art in italy, and the return of these affected many of their countrymen. . albert durer, a german artist and illustrator, in many of his engravings, showed a perfect understanding of the,conditions of italian design, leaning occasionally to the gothic style of his early master and on other occa- sions to the italian style of his more recent studies. the spread of these engravings undoubtedly influenced the german taste, but, even at its best, the renaissance of germany was impure. the inclination of her people for historic ornament. § difficulties that could be solved by the hand rather than by the head soon led her into strapwork, jeweled forms, and monstrous devices more animated than graceful, but exhibiting fully the delight of the clever mechanic to execute details that were difficult to handle but easy to conceive. . introduction into england.—the introduction of renaissance art into england dates from about the year , when henry viii employed an italian architect to design a monument in memory of henry vii, which still exists in westminster abbey and is almost a pure example of the italian style of that period. the same architect designed a monument of the countess of richmond at westminster, and shortly afterwards left england for spain, leaving behind, however, a number of italians attached to the service of henry viii, by whom a taste for the italian style was thoroughly inoculated into the country. among these was the architect john of padua, who appears to have done more work than any of the others, among the most important of which is the old sommerset house, built in . at the time these italian artists were spreading a taste for italian architecture and sculpture throughout the length and breadth of england, another influence was at work to temper this style and prevent its being accepted in its purest form. . iiolbeln.—in , the celebrated german artist holbein came to england from holland, and to him and john of padua is due mainly the resulting style of archi_ tecture that appeared in england during the reign of elizabeth. holbein was a man of great individual genius as a painter, and naturally inclined to establish the taste of the german school in england, and, though he died in —thirty years after entering the country—his influence on john of padua is plainly seen in the results of that archi- tect during the subsequent years. § historic ornament. . dutch influence. ——at the time of elizabeth, a number of artists came over from holland, built several buildings, and painted many portraits, and, though these artists and architects were thoroughly imbued with a taste for italian art, that taste was certainly affected by their dutch surroundings and education. theodore havens, of cleves, was architect of four gates of caius college, in england, built toward the close of the sixteenth century, and at this time it appears that most of the italian architects had left the country. there were many english goldsmiths and jewelers, as well as a number of artists and architects, whose names appear prominently at this time, and all this jointly had the effect of conglom- crating the dutch, italian, and english-gothic style of art. . political ties of england and holland.—during the reign of elizabeth we meet a great preponderance of dutch names, considering that it was an english country, which is accounted for by the fact that england was bound by political and religious ties with holland; and although the greater number of these names are applied to artists and painters, it must be borne in mind that all the arts were connected closely in those days, and artists and sculptors were frequently employed to design models for ornament and even for architecture, and, in the accessories of their own pictures, found frequent opportunity for the exhibition of ornamental design. michael angelo was an artist and painted the ceiling and side walls of the sistine chapel, at rome; michael angelo was a sculptor and carved much of the statuary that now stands in the corridors of some of the most ‘prominent museums of europe; michael angelo was an architect and completed the building of st. peter's church, in rome, the most stupendous undertaking of the age and the largest structure now in existence. . influences on english art. during the early part of queen elizabeth's reign, we are then justified in historic ornament. ' ' concluding that a most important influence must have been exercised on english art, through the medium of the prot- estant states and low countries and also of germany. heidelberg castle, in germany, was completed about this time, and it is not unlikely that this, too, had an effect on english art, especially when we consider that princess eliza- beth, daughter of james i of england, was queen of bohemia, and held court at heidelberg about the beginning of the seventeenth century. records show that toward the close of elizabeth's reign, and about the beginning of that of james i, english artists seem to have predominated, and it would appear that at this time would be found the most - likely development of a strictly native style. it is to be deplored, however, that this period of english art, known as jacobean, is undoubtedly the most inartistic, inappropriate, and ill-composed in all history. . elizabethan ornament.—thus we may expect to meet with the purest italian ornament during the reign of henry viii. during the reign of elizabeth, his daughter, we perceive but a slight imitation of the italian models and an almost complete adoption of the style of ornament practiced by the decorative artists of germany and the netherlands. in the reign of james i, elizabeth’s suc- cessor, we find this same style continued, or attempted to be continued, by the english artists, but in a large and gross manner. . characteristics.—there is little, then, that can be justly termed original in elizabethan ornament. it consists more of an adaptation of foreign elements—an adaptation of elements with which the adapters had no intimacy, and about which they had little understanding. the characteristics of elizabethan ornament may be described as consisting chiefly of a grotesque and complicated variety of pierced scrollwork with curled edges, as though a number of short straps were interwoven and their ends allowed to curl up; of interlaced bands, sometimes on a geometrical pattern, but more often § historic ornament. flowing irregularly and capriciously; bands composed of strap and nail-head ornaments; festoons of fruit and drapery inter- spersed with roughly executed figures of human beings; grotesque monsters and animals, with here and there large and flowing designs of natural branch and leaf ornament. high-paneled apartments often filled with designs of foliage, shields, and coats of arms, grotesque keystones in arches, and immense flowing brackets, are freely used; and the carving, whether in wood or stone, is always very roughly and crudely executed, and the design coarse and ill-adapted to the material in which it is executed. unlike the adoption of the classic style in italy and france, these ornaments are not applied to a gothic system of construction, but the entire building is masked under a coat of plaster or other material, and the groundwork of classic simplicity is first laid, to receive the meaningless ornament that stamps the period. . revival of antique art.—-about the beginning of the sixteenth century, the revival of the antique art, which we have already discussed, in italy became invigorated and reduced to a system, as we have said before, through its popular introduction afforded by the means of printing and engraving. translations of the work of vitruvius, copiously illustrated and ably commented upon, were printed and spread so as to become the foundation of work for every designer of eminence throughout the country, and at the same time offered a suggestion on which at least half a dozen other writers prepared treatises on architecture, among them palladio and vignola, whose works have been preserved and form the standard down to the present day. . . architecture and ornament during the period of the english renaissance may be considered as failures from an artistic standpoint. the purest ornament developed during this great historical period we find in france, where it was uninfiuenced by any foreign elements of importance except those received from italy with the style itself. historic ornament. § conclusion. . object ’ complete reviewal of historic orna- ment.~—thus we have considered the entire range of historic ornament, from the earliest days of egypt to the beginning of the nineteenth century. the object of this study has not been to acquire a number of forms that were characteristic of each period, that the student might copy or imitate out- lines and designs of the past, in order to execute ideas characteristic of a certain historic period. the purpose has ,been to train the mind in order that the natural develop- ments arising from conditions in the past can be applied to the probable conditions that would arise under similar cir- cumstances of the present day and the future. . influences affecting styles of art.—it has been pointed out that religion, politics, and geography have affected the character of ornament in different countries, as well as historic influences, and at the present day we find that the majority of the ornament is affected by the inven- tions and advancement in science and art characteristic of the nineteenth century, as was the renaissance period char- acterized by the advancement of learning in its period. in fact, the latter half of the nineteenth century has been characterized by some writers as a new renaissance, if such a term can be reasonably used. it certainly bears a similar relation, to the three hundred years that preceded it, that the beginning of the renaissance period bore to the centuries before its dawn. . effect of environments on art and architec- ture.—in the fifteenth century, we have the introduction of books to the masses of people, through the invention of the printing press and printing. a spread of desire for art and learning followed as soon as the antiquities of rome and greece were learned, and with this development of the human mind, a rapid advancement of civilization took place that characterizes the period as one of the most brilliant in history. § historic ornament. in the same manner, we have a number of inventions characteristic of the latter half of the nineteenth century that have so changed the conditions of man that his entire habits and character are different from those of his ancestors in the renaissance period. steam and electricity have been controlled so as to convert night into day, and make it no_ longer necessary to discontinue any line of work or manu- facture at sunset. these same agents have rendered the. distances between business centers—even on two continents —matters of only a few hours’ or days' travel. conversa- tion between individuals a thousand miles apart is so easily maintained that it may be considered that space, from a business standpoint, 'is practically annihilated, and, with a hundred other inventions, we are confronted with a propo- sition in design today that makes the _traditions and devices of past ages simply symbols of antiquity. the modern mind is so imbued with mechanics and inven- tions that the present age can give little time to the study and development of a national or characteristic art. designs of the past have been copied, and we are satisfied to imitate what has been done in this line, instead of trying to do some- thing for ourselves. the human mind has not attempted to invent practical art forms, and years hence the study of the art of this period will be considered in much the same terms that we now consider the art of the jacobean period in england. . adherence to old designs—a simple illustra- tion of this may perhaps be seen in the ordinary chandelier, or hanging light. in the days when candles furnished all the light for rich and poor that was obtainable, it was cus- tomary that a rod or bar should hang from some portion of the room and support on its end one or more candles. the introduction of lamps to general use made it necessary that there should be a bulb or metal globe somewhere near the bottom of this red, to be filled with oil to supply the lamp that still was suspended from the ceiling by a rod, or, occasion- ally, a chain. with the introduction of gas as illuminating historic ornament. § power, the rod was replaced by a pipe, still in imitation of the old rod, but serving the double purpose of support- ing the chandelier and conveying the gas to the burner. the horizontal bars that formerly carried lamps now carry lava tips from which the gas burns, and the large round i balls or globes that originally contained the oil to supply the lamp are now false, hollow devices, used to cover the joints where the vertical and horizontal bars are united. in addition to this, elaborate designs for gas fixtures often introduced long chains from various portions of their cross- bars to staples in the ceiling, suggesting that these fixtures were hung from the ceiling by chains, as the lamps of old— a clumsy deceit, inasmuch as the chains nearly always bun g loose and the fixture was plainly supported by its central pipe. from a point of design, nothing could be more incon- sistent than to borrow the chain that hung the lamp of our ancestors and use it as a decorative element where it was allowed to hang in a limp curve, on account of this outline being more pleasing ~to the eye. the reason for this is to be found in the fact that the designer did not invent new conditions to suit the new material. had he never known of chandeliers for candles and lamps and been called upon to design a device for gas, there is no doubt he would have done much better. .his knowledge of historic ornament in lamp fixtures, therefore, did not benefit him, but injured his ability to design something original for gas, and now, with the introduction of electricity, many are continuing in the same-error today. . all that is required for an electric-light illumination is a pair of small wires to convey the current, and a bulb in which the incandescent fiber is enclosed. the designer is free to use these two agents in any form he pleases, to elabo- rate them in any way he chooses, and to produce an equal illumination of a room in the simplest and most artistic way that circumstances can possibly admit. yet, the majority of our electrolier designs are based on developments of the historic ornament. § carpets on floors were practically unknown at this period, and some of the richest palaces had floor coverings of no better material than straw; but in the nineteenth century we require carpet, and our gothic interior need not be made as crude as a barn in order to be correct; we can use hard- wood floors and rugs, or if carpet is more desirable, we must avoid colors and designs that are inconsistent with the spirit of our purpose. . \vindow and wall ornamentation.—we must remember that glass was scarce and expensive at this time, and that in most cases the windows were large and filled with small panes—first, for the admission of sunshine and air, and, second, for economy. but glass is cheap now, and it is not necessary that we should divide our windows up into a multitude of trivial openings, in order that our panes may be small, because they were in the gothic period. leaded glass and stained glass existed in those days and can be used now to obtain any effect we desire that is con- sistent with our purpose. walls were hung with tapestries at that time, whereas to-day the paper manufacturer has, for economical reasons, crowded the tapestry industry into a comparatively second place, except for the very wealthy. however, we can cover our walls with paper if we choose, but its design should not be suggestive of any period but the one we have in mind. and so throughout, all our efforts may be carried out with the material we have in hand or available at the present time, if we but stop to consider the reason for certain things in the past and a reason why they should or should not be reproduced in the present. . this same suggestion applies to the designer of fabrics of all kinds as well as to the decorator, and, whethe - executing a design for a carpet, wall paper, dress fabric, or linen damask, it is a simpler matter, if its practice is once started, to imitate the spirit of any age or style than it is to attempt to copy the elements of existing designs. § historic ornament. historic letterdyg. . lettering does not in reality form a part of historic ornament as the various other ornamental details do, but it is here introduced with the explanation of the characteristics of each style, in order that it may be associated with the ornamental style of each characteristic period. we all know that there was no such style of alphabet as we term antique egyptian extant in ancient egypt, but we do find letters of this character in certain roman works executed at a late period on egyptian soil, and it is from these that it derives its name. the styles of letter here given must all be accepted with a certain amount of liberality, as each, though in har- mony with the period it represents, has certain modern char- acteristics introduced for purely commercial advantages. . the practical designer is frequently called upon to execute ornamental lettering appropriate to some historic style and in harmony with some practical purpose. for this reason the student is herewith given a number of useful alphabets, with a brief description of each, that will enable him to execute the outlines of each letter properly and pro- portion them according to rules. the titles given to these alphabets are names by which they are known in modern use and explain themselves. there is no rule by which one can determine what style of letter is best suited to each particular purpose, but it is well to bear in mind that legibility is always the first con- sideration, and where the lettering of a design is intended to convey direct information, as in a sign or piece of adver- tising matter, the lettering should be simple and clear in order that the purpose of the design may not fail. on the other hand, where the lettering is for a certificate, diploma, memorial, or other piece of matter that is more ornamental than instructive, the lettering may be elaborated to any degree within reasonable limits. the relative amount of space covered by letters and background is a matter of design that is considered in the same manner as spotting, du .oË —— —- _.__ ._ ._.._j._ ——j_ b—o—d— “icc —o— ci: s...— f: be? i i . , ‘» ËËËe ÆËaqËzŒ § historic ornament. and the proportions of letters to each other must also be considered in the composition of the design, as matters of the principal and subordinate parts of the same design, all of which will be more fully explained hereafter. elaboration of letters or the use of elaborate letters does not enhance either the beauty or the value of the design unless these letters are used intelligently, and a plain letter correctly and intelligently proportioned will produce a much more pleasing effect than the most elaborate style badly and ignorantly arranged. antique egyptian alphabet. . this letter, fig. , is almost identical with the plain egyptian, the distinction being in the addition of the spur at the angles of the letters, but no variation occurs in the propor- tion of the letter or its stroke. the stroke of a letter is the proportional width of its heavy lines in comparison with its height. in this letter the stroke is one-fifth the height. as shown by the small squares in which the letter surface is 'divided. some designers make the spur much more exag- gerated than is shown on this plate, while others make it scarcely perceptible. the examples given herewith, how- ever, may be taken as an average, wherein the spur projects about one-third the width of the stroke. all letters having a horizontal stroke, as the e, l, etc., have these strokes fin- ished with a beveled end, on which the spur is added at the same _angle. the ends of the strokes of the c and the upper stroke of the g and s, and figures , , , , and are beveled at an angle opposite to that of the other letters referred to above. this bevel, shown on the upper terminal of c, is made by drawing a line from a point one-fourth the width of the stroke to the right of a to a point one-third the width of the stroke to the left of c. the points a and refer to the intersection of the fifth vertical line from the left side of the letter, with the third horizontal line marked . the middle bar of the a is the width of the stroke below historic ornament. § the center; the middle bar of the h is one-half the width of the stroke above the center; while the middle bars of the e and f are exactly in the center. the f is finished with a spur at e, as well as just above e. the points that deter- mine the inclination of the strokes of the k are from a to two-thirds the width of the stroke below d, and from f to the intersection of the upper slanting stroke with line one- third the width of the stroke above a'. the two slanting strokes of the ill meet in the center of the letter at a point on line f, and no spurs exist on the insides of the slanting strokes at the top. the tail of the q is cut on an angle of ~ degrees, the shorter side being the width of the stroke in length and the longer side being equal to the distance from to f. the tail of the r is a slanting stroke; the points of contact are d to f. the strokes of the w come to a point on line a to correspond with the ill. the corner of the z is beveled off at about the same angle as the interior of the and the top of the character &. the long slanting stroke of the character & is drawn from a point one-half the width of the stroke to the left and below a to a point one- half the width of the stroke to the right of f. the corre- sponding, or upper, slanting stroke, from its top to the beginning of the curve, is made from a point one-half the width of the stroke to the right and below a to a point d. the other slanting stroke intersects the long stroke the width of the stroke below this point and is parallel with the' upper stroke, finishing on line c. the curve by which these strokes are united is three-fourths the width of the stroke to the left of line at e. the middle bar of the numeral is beveled at a slight angle, as shown. the character of the numeral is changed at the point where the vertical stroke joins the curved bottom portion of the numeral . the point added below the line a' is necessary to fill out the space to the line of the curve. the numerals , , and are about one-third the width of the stroke wider than the other char- aracters, but are similar in other respects to the same numerals in the plain egyptian alphabet. the lower-case letters are, in many respects, the same as § historic ornament. those in the plain egyptian alphabet, although many excep- tions occur. all strokes extending above the line a are cut at an angle of degrees, to which the spur is added at the same angle. this characteristic is also observable on letters of shorter height, such as the z', j, m, n, etc., but the ends of the strokes of all letters extending below the line are finished without this detail. light antique egyptian alphabet. . the difference between the alphabet shown in fig. and that shown in fig. is almost entirely in the weight of the stroke. the capital letters and figures of this alpha- bet are one-fourth higher than wide, with the exception of the letters a, .‘w, o, q, s, v, etc., which are wider than the others, and the letters , l, and n, which are narrower. on the top line we have, in a, a letter whose width is equal to its height, and in [a letter whose width is but three thirty-seconds its height. the cross-bar of the a is two and two-thirds strokes above the bottom line, and the curved line at the top and to the left of a is a short pen or brush stroke termed the cyma, on account of its resemblance to the curve of the greek moldings of that name. the purpose of the cyma in lettering is to fill the space between the slanting parts of the letters, or extremities of letters where wide openings are likely to appear where the letters are placed together. it is also used as an integral part of some letters, as in the q and lower part of the z. in other styles of lettering the cyma is frequently used as a structural part of many letters, particularly in the old english alphabet. on the letter a the cyma is eight strokes in length and is located one stroke to the left of the upper point of the a. the letter b is fashioned so that its lower portion to the middle of bar is eight strokes above the bottom line, and projects one stroke to the right of the upper portion. as far as it goes, the letter c is a perfect are of a circle, and the spur on the inside is about two strokes from the top line. the nazsnsevwi eases @ nae nee even >>>neomonozn nxnzoeneens @ st negazfl § historic ornament. lower extremity of the letter projects a stroke beyond the top and finishes at a point about three strokes above the lower line. the right side of the letter d is semicircular and becomes tangent at the top and bottom three strokes to the right of the vertical. e, f, g, and h each possess a . middle bar that is located four strokes below the top of the letter, and in the letters if and f this middle bar extends to within three strokes of the right extremity of the letter. in k the slanting stroke begins three strokes above the lower line and extends to the top line where the end is beveled at an angle of about sixty degrees. the letter l is about one stroke narrower than the other letters, and the cyma is placed over it so that its lower extremity is even with the right-hand portion of the letter. ' is two strokes wider than the other letters, and in some cases is made precisely like an inverted w, except at the union of the two slanting strokes where the letter is finished flat with a spur instead of being pointed as in the iv. here the middle strokes of the ! are brought to a point one-half the width of the letter below the top line. the slanting stroke of the ncommences on the vertical stroke one~fourth the width of the letter below the bottom line. the loops of the pand r are very different in style, the middle bar of the p being four and two-thirds strokes from the bottom line, while the middle stroke of the r is six and two-thirds strokes above the bottom line. the tail of the r intersects the middle bar at a point where the curve becomes tangent. the letter curves in each direction from a point in the center of the letter on a line with the middle bar of the r, and this letter is narrower at the top than at the bottom and can be enclosed in an isosceles triangle whose height is about three times the height of the letter. the w is precisely the same as two v’s joined at a point two and two-thirds strokes below the top line. the vertical stroke of the y extends six and two- thirds strokes above the bottom line, the letter being twelve strokes wide on the top. the x is nine strokes wide on top and thirteen strokes wide on the bottom. the letter z is the same width as the average letters on top, but it may m qhwm‘vnfl - _ .w high“ ida- ! eglhqom< ciizfigwfl hdgfz< § historic ornament. be finished either with the cyma as shown here, or with a bot- tom corresponding in detail to the top, as the fancy dictates. the figures are of the average width of the letters, the being similar to the s, and the z to the . the lower-case letters are easily constructed, as shown. heavy antique egyptian alphabet. . the style of letter shown in fig. is the heavy extreme of the antique egyptian style, in the same manner that fig. was the light extreme of this style. between these two extremes the style may be varied to almost any extent, slight variations in the form of letter being necessary to suit the different conditions. the heavy antique egyp- tian, however, is rarely used as a solid black letter as shown in this figure, and is only so printed here in order to preserve uniformity in the alphabets. in much design work this letter is found in simple outline, and though extremely bulky on account of the weight of its stroke, it may be gracefully handled and elaborately orna- mented to produce a most pleasing efiect. the stroke in the antique egyptian alphabet should not exceed one-third the full width of the average letter, which is the extreme illustrated in this case, and it will be observed that with this heavy stroke it is necessary that certain letters, such as the k, s, v, iv, etc., be carried beyond the limiting top and bottom lines, in order that the full outline of the letter may be shown without confusion of parts. in some places, too, it will be found necessary to diminish the width of the stroke in order to leave necessary space between strokes, and other variations may be indulged to suit specific circumstances. medieval roman alphabet. . this style of letter, by many authorities, is termed the antique roman, but it belongs to the historic period indicated by its name. the medieval roman alphabet as ogre m we q chegsm mdmozeds ewammuma. ~ “ / rh § ' historic ornament. shown in fig. possesses three distinct and characteristic features. first, there is a small spur that projects above and below the lettering lines, and there is another projection of the inside line of the stroke beyond the fine line fora distance of about one-third the stroke, as in the top of the letter a and the bottom of the letter n; and besides these, every angle between a stroke and a fine line is rounded. the width of the stroke here is from one-fourth to one-fifth the height of the letter, and the spur is one stroke long and is joined to the letter one stroke above the bottom, or below the top line, thus making the curve on the inside an exact quarter circle. all letters average five strokes in width, with the excep- tion of such letters as have heretofore been described as varying from the regular limits. in the lettera the fine line intersects the stroke at the point of the letter, and though on its inside the stroke is carried past the fine line, the intersection takes place precisely as though this peculi- arity did not exist. the horizontal fine line of the a is one and one-fourth strokes above the bottom of the letter. light and iieav y french roman alphabet. . in modern usage the roman alphabet is varied somewhat to suit certain purposes. one of these variations, called the “new york roman,” adheres in outline very closely to the original medieval form with the exception of the projecting spur of the stroke beyond the fine line. another variation, known as the “french roman," dilfers from its prototype by increasing the weight of the fine line in order that it may be better expressed in carved stone- work, etc. the variations of these three styles, from an extremely light letter to an extremely heavy letter, is prac- ticed by all designers, but the similarity is such that we only give the normal conditions of the medieval roman and extreme conditions of the french. in fig. is shown the light french roman alphabet, q®fqdtmun_ .w n>x€>dfw mqloz ese? ~i®lmd®e ~ hugger zen/era h § historic ornament. was“ remix“ q. jklmnopq rsiu abodefgh z vlll ]x x xx'l'c-d'm' abodefghijklmno new“ “mums: illllllllllvvvivii qust z meow-n m. roma“ fig. . and this fills the same position in the variation of the alphabet as the light antique egyptian. in giv- ing the letter weight, as shown in fig. , certain liberties are taken with the fine lines, as shown in the lower strokes of the e, l, and z. in using these roman alphabets, care must be taken to have the lower- case letters well proportioned in the weights of their strokes with the capitals that are used. in fig. are shown the lower-case letters of the french roman and the medieval roman alphabets, the former, it will be observed, possess ing a much heav- ier stroke. these lower-case letters. in fig. are pro- portioned for the normal condition § historic ornament. of alphabet, and where used with the heavy or light alphabet, they must be increased or diminished in stroke accordingly. the use of the roman numerals with these alphabets is by no means essential, but the numerals are given here in order that the proportionate stroke may be observed. there are many cases where the use of the medieval roman alphabet is appropriate beyond all other alphabets, and it is usual that in such cases the roman numerals be used. gothic alphabet. ' . the style of letter we term “gothic ” was designed during the latter part of the medieval period and is asso- ciated both historically and architecturally with the style of gothic architecture that existed during the flamboyant period in france and the perpendicular period in england. in modern use this letter is largely applied to church deco- ration for the purpose of making religious quotations, and is also used in printing for certain kinds of literature on account of its origin in ancient monasteries. it is similar but much more easily read than what we term “church text," and is, therefore, given here to the exclusion of the latter, as it is much more serviceable. in fig. the capital and lower-case letters, as well as the figures, are shown, and the distinguishing characteristics of this style lie in the peculiar formation of the letters a, c, e, f, il], and u. the letters a, .m', n, etc. do not possess any slanting strokes as they do in the roman alphabets, but are formed with a vertical stroke as one of their sides and curved strokes for the rest of the outline. the letters c and e are closed on their right sides by a vertical line ending in small dots or volutes, the line on e being longer than that on the c. the fis similar in gen- eral outline to the capital f of the roman styles, but carries its spur on the upper fine line below the bottom of the letter itself. the capital h is but slightly varied from the lower-case it, and the j is peculiar in its general details to faazémaw memwmmwmflsmeme oewsenwnna swmmgke mehqmhq imam ewemwmvmm a sees. a. _ nylvm??? fmmtoahoz iévwfiwfi . ,wpqequqq nnhxuqv? fifmeflvqqz zfixwvw l imavvm @q u was“. $ duvet/£ .. fig wyn § historic ornament. this style of alphabet. other details of peculiarity exhibit themselves to the student as he studies this style. this letter is frequently elaborated in certificate and engrossing work, by means of shading and elaborate backgrounds, and 'some proportions of the letters may be slightly changed in order to suit them to particular circumstances. a later development of this alphabet is shown in fig. , where the letters a, m, ]v, etc. partake of the same char- acteristics as the roman letter, while the peculiar ogival form of outline characteristic of the gothic style is main- tained in all of the curves in the stroke. a strong character- istic difference, however, between the alphabet in fig. and that in fig. is that in the former all the fine lines are straight and in the latter all of the fine lines are curved, except in the a, k, ]; etc. this style of letter, usually termed “ th century,” is suitable where more elaboration is required than the gothic style permits, and is seldom used for church work as it is associated with that period of archi- tecture when the building of churches was in its decline. another style of letter that had its origin, also, in the gothic is illustrated in fig. and is termed “ henry vii " inasmuch as the only existing example of this work is to be seen in the henry vii chapel at westminster abbey. as a matter of fact, this is technically a renaissance style, although like all early renaissance art it developed from the gothic. the tendency to elaboration and the intro- duction of meaningless curves and forms is characteristic of this period, but the style of alphabet when properly treated afi'ords a very valuable means of enriching a design that is composed almost entirely of lettering work. old english alphabet. . a standard alphabet that has ever been popular and is ever serviceable under certain conditions is the old english, shown in fig. . there can be little doubt that this bears a close relation to the gothic alphabet, and, mmamma: ‘ savages? has.“ e seems ereemgeeezé evangees‘se saw @éwfiwee § historic ornament. indeed, its lower-case letters are very similar to the gothic; and, though it is much used in church work and in the designing of certificates and other engrossed documents, it is not as legible as the gothic alphabet and is more suitable for conditions where ornamentation is required rather than cleaninformation. it will be observed in this alphabet that the cyma forms a marked characteristic in each of the letters. for instance, in the letter e nearly all the strokes are composed of at least a portion of the cyma. certain letters are very hard to distinguish from one another in this alphabet, and care should be taken to remember the distinguishing character- istics of each in order that they may be rendered without referring constantly to the copy. in some forms of alphabet, the c and the e are almost identical, the exception between the two letters being that the e contains a solid stroke where the two horizontal fine lines exist in the c. we think it preferable, however, to use the form of e shown in fig. , although this is somewhat confusing when compared with the f. it will be observed that the vertical stroke of the f is a straight stroke and not a cyma as in the e, and that a fine line connecting the upper spur of the f with the main stroke is straight instead of a curved continuation of a cyma as in the letter e. t and u are also difficult to distinguish in some styles of alphabet, and study should be given to the formation of the i and f in order that they may not become confusing. a little consideration of these letters will show the student that there are only three or four different styles of stroke and that many different letters are formed simply by the addition of some detail of other letters. for instance, the letter e differs but slightly from the letter l, except in the addition of its center spur, and the left-hand portion of the letter m is almost identical with the letter . similar resemblances will be found in many other letters, such as the q, r, etc., and the z, though shown on this plate with a compound final stroke, is often drawn with a top and bot- tom of the same character. historic ornament. § the lower-case letters are similar to the lower-case letters of the gothic alphabet, except that they are somewhat heavier in their stroke, but for all practical purposes the two styles are so near alike in their lower case that one is fre- quently used with the other without invoking any severe criticism. . in making use of these alphabets in design, it has been customary to , associate all the roman styles with classic and renaissance art and to use the gothic and “ th century" with medieval art; while the henry vii and old english are used both in medieval and renaissance art. there are cases where one style of letter may be used per- fectly proper in another style of art, but care must be given to this consideration when the mixture of styles is attempted, as it will readily be seen that there is nothing particularly incongruous about using the roman 'letter in renaissance art, or even in gothic art, but a gothic letter would be highly out of place in classic art no matter what were the circum- stances. the reason for this should be clear, as the gothic architect might have inherited some knowledge of the roman letter and used it in his designs, but it would be utterly impossible for the roman designer to borrow a letter of the gothic style inasmuch as that letter had not been invented during the period of the roman architectural styles. . the initial letters that are woven in many of the designs of french renaissance art usually tend toward the character of the french roman, and the interwoven initials of h and c in the wall decoration shown in fig. are borrowed from the style we have herein described as french roman, and comparison of other initials that will be found carved in the stonework of the mantels illustrated in the foregoing pages will indicate that they have all been adapted to their modern purpose from the more ancient style of classic letter. elements of ornament. o composition. unity in design.—compositlon in art deals almost . entirely with the grouping of the elements of a design to bring them together and appear as a unity. no matter of how many parts a design may be composed, if these parts are properly treated, it will present to the eye an appear- ance of unity and individu- ality, and only in such periods of art history,as the designs have presented this unity do we find a progress in a thoroughly artistic sense. to illustrate this some- fig. . (a) (b) fig. what, we have, in fig. , a group of six lines, all of one length, but irregularly arranged. there is no expression gs for notice of the copyright, see page immediately following the title page. elements of ornament. _ § of unity in this, nor is there anything about it suggestive of an attempt at any kind of an arrangement, but in fig. these same six lines are so placed as to convey an idea beyond the lines themselves, and the individual lines are lost in the expression of unity. another method of pro- ducing this impression is to surround the irregularly drawn \ ——/_\/ f“___”_l /\ i . ///\//\ | - \//\/\ l _____.| fig. . fig. . lines with some detail of more importance, as shown in fig. , where a number of irregular lines are included within a rectangle and the force of the outline is sufficient to com- bine all the lines in one idea. again, the smaller lines may be grouped to form a series of geometrical figures within a similar geometrical figure, and produce this same feeling, as shown in fig. . . limit of ntllne.—in order to express this feeling of unity, there must be a limit in the outline governing the arrangement of the lines; for instance, in fig. we have a aaaa_ fro. . series of equal lines arranged in groups that repeat indefi- nitely; but there is nothing to stop them and there is afeeling of continuity as though it might be extended forever in the same arrangement without materially changing the form. this feeling is not unity, but continuity, of which we shall § elements of ornament. have occasion to speak later. in fig. , the arrangement of the six lines, in one case, conveys an impression of extension, as though it could be extended in any direction and in all directions without impairing the original form—this is con- tinuity in all directions. the other geometrical form in fig. conveys the idea of unity and contraction without any impression of a desire to spread out. . assemblage of details to secure unity—in assembling the subordinate details of a design in order to secure a unity in the whole, there are three general arrangements or groupings that completely satisfy the mind to a sense of unity: one single object always looks well alone, unless improperly subdivided or surrounded by a lot of trivial and discordant details. an arrangement con- sisting of a group of two things can be made to look well, unless there is too great a difference in their form or size, or unless they are badly united. any group of three things looks well, unless they are of uniform size or consist of too prominent a character to be expressed in any quantity at all. surface decoration. , subdivlslon of space. surface decoration con- sists in the subdivision of a given space so that its parts shall bear a relation to one another that varies in form and shade. this subdivision may be accomplished by the judi- cious spacing of a number of straight lines so that the sepa- rated members bear a definite relation to one another. take, for instance, the square; its pro- portions cannot in any way be varied, as all its sides are equal; but its surface may be divided into a number of smaller i squares, as shown in fig. , f . o. elements of ornament. ( ciij simply by the placing of equally spaced vertical and hori- zontal lines. this, however, does not accord with our idea of unity, because, if it expressed unity, we should feel that nothing could be taken away from the square without destroying its value, and, in fig. , should we take away eleven of the smaller squares across the top and one side, we would still have a square very little different from the first one. . arrangement of l nes.—suppose we divide the surface of the square somewhat as shown in fig. ' , spacing the dividing lines more irregularly and grouping the lines themselves in pairs and singly. this relieves the surface of its monotony, and the various parts bear definite relations % fig. . fig. . to one another, so that the surface appears as a unit, the subtraction of any member of which would materially change its appearance. in fig. we have another sub- division of the surface of the square where the lines are not symmetrical on all four sides, and yet this is relieved of that feeling of monotony so dominant in fig. . an immense variation of surface can thus be accomplished simply by ~the placing of lines, and the more irregular the intervals between the lines, the greater scope is there for invention and design, as there is no limit to the number of different arrangements that can be arrived at in the division of a space in this manner. the symmetrical arrangement in §g elements of ornament. fig. is the character of subdivision we must adhere to in the design of ceilings, paneled wainscots, and the like, while the unsymmetrical design shown in fig. is char- acteristic of woven fabrics such as plaids and other dress goods. . in order to fully comprehend the importance of this simple suggestion, the student should make a freehand drawing of a simple square measuring about inches on each side, and divide it by vertical and horizontal lines into various relative shapes. a piece of tracing paper laid over the square, so as to retrace its outline, may be used to advantage, and a traced square made in this way may be divided into a number of pleasing forms that may afterwards fig. . be compared to determine which of the arrangements are more satisfactory to the eye than others. when this has been determined, endeavor to ascertain what arrangement of lines satisfies the eye most, and what arrangement satisfies it least. some arrangements will always be more interesting than others, and a little study will show that the most sat- isfactory groupings are dependent entirely on the variation in the proportions and relations of their parts. take, for instance, fig. , wherein we have six different arrangements on precisely the same grouping of lines, the relative parts of this being produced by shade and not by line grouping, § elements of ornament. in the venetian style or the most brilliant coloring in moorish art. . relation of colors.—in the coloring of parts we do not really consider the actual spectrum shades that exist on adjacent members of a design, but rather the tints or shades as they appear to the eye. a design may be expressed in two tints or it may be expressed in more, and the depths of these tints should bear a definite relation to one another in proportion to the surface that is covered. \ve know that the three primary colors—yellow, red, and blue—exist in their pure form in perfect harmony in the proportion of , , and , and the same maybe said of black- and-white compositions. a certain depth of one shade must be in exact proportion to a lighter or darker shade, in order that a feeling of harmony may exist in the composition. in all examples of ancient art we find that attention has been given not only to the exact subdivision of a surface in order that the space relations may be pleasing, but that the most careful consideration has been given to the coloring of each of these divisions and its appearance and relation beside the coloring of its neighbors. this color relation can exist in line composition where the lines used are of different breadths, or weights, thereby bringing somewhat the effect of a surface element in their appearance. . light and shade. we find in certain oriental designs for rugs a thorough understanding of this relation of light and shade, and to it we are indebted largely to the influence of mohammedan religion on oriental art. as the creed of mohammed forbade the representation of any natural form, it became necessary for his followers to secure pleasing effects in their designs by color relation or light and shade, and thus freed from the struggle to imitate nature, their whole attention could be concentrated on this other element. . reversion of colors.—in fig. is shown a design for a rug, based on the simplest geometrical lines, while in fig. the same identical pattern is produced, but § elements of ornament. reversed so far as its color relations are concerned. it is at once evident that any design consisting of but two tones is fig. . put the border of fig. on susceptible to this reversing of its treatment in color relations, and parts of it also can in some cases be reversed, while others remain the same. for instance, in. fig. we have a rug with a dark center on which the geometrical ornament is traced in light lines, while the border is of a light shade and the geometrical orna- ment is traced in dark lines. in fig. we have exactly the reversal of this—a light center and a dark border. fig. and we have a dark rug throughout, the geometrical ornament of which is executed in light lines; reverse this new pattern,and we have what would be the equivalent of fig. with the border of fig. . in this way a num- ber of different arrangements in light-and—shade effects can be made with the same geo- metrical design as its founda- tion. in fact, many grades of rugs and carpets are woven so that one side presents one effect and the other exactly its reverse in light and shade. . reverslon of trent- ment.—in fig. are shown four styles of ornamentation, each of which is expressive of unity and balance in its § elements of ornament. design, but each at the same time being perfectly capable of a reversal in treatment in three or more ways. for instance, fig. . in any example the border can consist of black figures on a white ground and the center of white figures on a black ground, or the border and center can both consist of white iii-r- . lug-iii- i .e "a. mm m“. % .h". i i i i i i. i-i i... i“: 'i. i'- fig. . § elements of ornament. figures on a black ground, or a third arrangement will per- mit of a reversal of the first; certain figures can be changed and others remain the same, thus giving a great variety. the proper understanding and comprehension of this color relation in surface decoration enables the student to produce an almost unlimited variety of effects, as is shown in fig. . here we have eight examples of variation in light and shade, all based on precisely the same geometrical arrangement, the entire variation being produced simply by a variation in the relation and proportion of the effects of light and shade. the frequent practice of rendering in this manner is of immense value to the designer. let him divide a surface up into a number of small rectangles and then work over them with a brush charged with heavy color, and group these rectangles so as to produce different symmetrical designs, in order that he may familiarize himself with the capability of these forms for extension and compre- hend the value of a thorough understanding of this principle. . variety of designs from same elements. referring to fig. , the eight examples there shown are executed in but two colors—black and white—and all based on a uniform arrangement of lines that divide the surface originally into a number of small»squares. turn this prin- ciple over to immediate practical work, and we find that, in laying a tile or mosaic floor, any one of these designs could be produced with a series of tiles or mosaics cut to uniform squares representing each of the squares divided in our sur- face design, and colored in proportion to the light and shade of our example. ‘ in wood mosaic or parquetry work, a number of simple squares or a combination of squares and rectangles of uni- form sizes in light and dark woods would produce any of these eight patterns and many more. the arrangement of the geometrical constructive principle of diagonally inter- secting lines so as to produce the triangle, the lozenge shape, or the hexagon, brings us again in contact with other sys- tems of construction in which the variety is also unlimited. elements of ornament. § conventionalism. . necessity of conventionalism. —conventlon- allsm of design is usually very much misunderstood by students in art, and the majority are inclined to believe that it is simply a term that means stiffness and rigid for- mality in a design. this is entirely wrong. a conventional treatment may be easy and flowing as well as severe, both qualities being necessary and valuable in their proper places, but by no means is either one of them absolutely necessary at all times. as an illustration, take a piece of pottery or a china plate, and the design executed on it represents a spray of flowers. while it is proper that the designer should go to nature and draw his instructions from natural forms in order to create decorative design, there is a limit to which he can carry this imitation justifiably, and it is in this spray of flowers where that limit shall be expressed. . shall the imitation be a portrait of the flower spray, showing the light and shade, and the shine of the leaves, and all the details connected with the appearance of that spray under particular conditions of surrounding and lighting? or, shall it represent the spray regardless of light and shade, so that, no matter under what conditions the plate or pottery appears, its decoration will always seem to be in place ? a plate is a movable object, and its decoration is seldom seen in the same position twice in succession. therefore, a painted spray on this plate, that demanded a certain condition of light in order that it should appear to its best advantage, would be entirely out of place, while one with the light and shade ignored, all the refinements of form still retained, and all the delicate details of nature emphasized, would certainly be most suitable. in the naturalistic treatment, the beautiful and delicate details of nature are lost in the attempt to make the spray seem natural, and, in making it natural—contrary as it may seem—we make it false. § elements of ornament. . invention and imitation.—decorative art origi- nates in two distinct faculties of the mind—the invent-ive, or constructive, and the imitative. inventive ornament consists of an arbitrary and abstract arrangement of lines calculated to produce a pleasing effect. this is character- istic of the savage tribes, though traces of it pervaded all the great styles, the frets and interlacings of the classic, medieval, and arabian styles being of this character. invent- ive ornament of this class affords the best practice to the student in the study of decorative design, and, at the same time, offers the best and simplest means of demonstrating some of the greatest principles of ornament. . the oval in nature—there is an abstract form that seems to pervade many beautiful forms in nature; this form we call the oval, and on it are based many outlines seen in the vegetable world. it is an elementary outline of many leaves, and also enters into the composition of the human head and hand. in studying the oval we find that its two sides are alike, that is, it is repeated on each side of a center line. it is not only repeated, but, being reversed, one side is contrasted to another, and still, again, throughout the entire curve—unlike the curve of a circle—there is a constant change of form and direction; therefore, we have a variety. hence, three important principles of design—rrpvfz'lzbn, contrast, and varirly—are expressed in the simple form of this oval. ' . repetition, contrast, and variety—now let us take up these three principles in a point of design. the simplest arrangement of lines in order to secure repetition is somewhat shown at (a) in fig. , but here there is no variety; while at (b) we secure variety with the same arrangement for repetition by making the lines of varying lengths, but there is no contrast. let us again change them and put them as we have them at (c), which gives us con- trast, but destroys our variety. however, by adopting the elements of ornament. § three methods in (a), ( )), and (c), we have in (d), repetition, variety, and contrast—the three elements that we seek. abandoning lines, let us return to some natural form. in l l l i |||||l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l (~\/\/\/ flo. . a) (b) fig. , at (a), we have repetition, at (b), we have variety, and at (c), by combining (a) and (b), introducing the third element as in the previous case, we have repetition, variety, and contrast in leaf forms as desired. .‘ symmetry and radiation—in addition to these principles, we have evolved two more, so far unspoken of, as shown at (b) and (d) in fig. . these principles are, \i/ // fig. ?. symmetry and radiation. symmetry has many forms of expression, but usually may be considered to mean lz'kesz'a'e‘d- mars, no matter what the form of the object may be. at (a), § elements of ornament. fig. , is shown a form of symmetry that consists simply of the arrangement and repetition of a given form each side of a center line; this is known as bz'symmrtry. at (b) is a similar arrange- ment where the forms on the sides are the same in detail as the form that separates them; this is known as tri- .rymmz'lry. at' (a), where there are a number of forms each side of a similar form in the center, we have what is known as multzkymmefry. by bringing the forms shown at ( ), fig. , together to form a unity, we have an example of radiation from a point, as shown at (d), while the dis- tribution of the forms along a center line, as shown in fig. , gives an example of radiation from a center line. fig. . ornament. linear ornament. . ancient pottery decoration. from a considera- tion of the earliest forms of historic art, it will be found that, after the most suitable form of utensil for the purpose required had been arrived at, the easiest and readiest means were employed to execute the decoration of its surface. the elements of the pattern were of the simplest character— composed of straight lines—and a pointed stick was gener- ally used to execute the ornament in the soft clay of their pottery. fig. shows a vase where the straight lines variously arranged in patterns are disposed in bands, and the patterns are a result of simple arrangement in accordance with some fundamental principle handed down from generation to generation. pottery is selected for the demonstration of elements of ornament. ur this point; inasmuch as it is of a more durable character, we have more examples of the early period, and it there- fore furnishes a more reliable series of art development. it has often been demonstrated that the patterns evolved by weaving are identi- cal with, and often suggested by, the patterns found on pottery. it is only incidental to point out' in this figure that' there appears to be an unconscious obedience to the laws of fitness in the application of these straight-line pat- terns. they are not applied in an arbitrary way, but in harmony with the structure they adorn. . fitness of ornament—as a usual thing, the rim comes in for deco- ration in order to give the part most likely to fracture an appearance of strength, while any change in the contour of the form is usually emphasized by additional ornamentation. the reason for this may be found in the fact that the application of ornament gives an impression of strength, and, when a vase or jug in its plastic condition is difficult to maintain in shape, the idea naturally sug- gests itself to the potter to decorate that part that exhib- its the weakness of the form. this determines largely the location of the bands around the curves. we will find also a precedent for this in the vegetable world, as changes in the directions of stems are generally accented in some way or other by the thickening or broadening of the point of union for the two elements. the stem of a leaf is usually almost as large or thick as the branch itself at that point. fig. . . as we progress in the study of prehistoric decora- tion, the later examples possess the curved line, and the zigzag—so common in early work—becomes softened and gradually develops itself into a wavy scroll, as shown at § elements of ornament. (a), (b), and (c) in fig. . the changes arise from the fact that the angles are first rounded off, and the other portions of the line between the curves are softened and graduated until the zigzag loses its identity entirely in the wavy line at (c). . constructive (a) origin of decoratlve w art.-—from these illus- (b) trations it will be readily understood that decora- tive art had a construc- (c) tive .origin. primitive man, finding it necessary to provide coverings for his body, learned that the weaving of certain strands produced certain patterns, such as the zig- zag, lozenge, etc., and in later periods, when he had learned the use of metals, he applied the forms thus associated in his mind. these forms were again adopted in decorating other materials, and hence formed a starting point for decoration. fig. . . evolution of deslgn.—if the student will now follow out graphically the progress of design from the work of the savage to that of civilized man, he will comprehend a number of details that he otherwise could not learn. on a sheet of paper, rule off a number of equally spaced vertical and horizontal lines, as shown in fig. . then emphasize certain lines of the square meshes, but varying the emphasis by shade work or spotting to produce different patterns all based on- the same geometrical principle as shown at (a), (b), (c), and (d). (a) is the simplest form, and consists of repeated crosses alternating with squares, while (b) is evolved on the same principle, but by uniting the inter- mediate squares with the crosses; (c) is another pattern resulting from the inclusion of a greater number of founda- tion squares, and (d) shows how an interlaced design may be produced. the geometrical figures at (r) contain fig. . (b) (d) (e) ( ) fig. . . all/ p. u elements of ornament. elements of more progressive design, and resemble the pat- terns usually evolved by the savage race. in fig. is shown a different series of patterns evolved by working on the diagonals of the squares and then by the introduction of semicircles struck from the angles or inter- sections of the diagonals. . limitless variety of patterns.—the product of various patterns on this plan is almost unlimited, a few of which are shown in fig. in order that the student may better understand the extent to which this can be carried. at (a), fig. , quarter circles are struck from the center of each figure, thereby forming a series of wavy lines that determine the shape of the pattern. at ( ), how- ever, a series of semicircles is emphasized so as to gen- erate a trefoil pattern, while (a) and (d) are produced by means of a number of tangent circular arcs, and is developed upon lines crossing one another diagonally so as to. leave lozenge shaped spaces instead of squares or parallelograms. ' in the latter case we have a series of figures produced somewhat as shown in fig. , each of which can be used as <> ( ) (w ( ) (d) fig. . the element for the construction of a new pattern, as shown in fig. . if, now, we reduce the forms shown in fig. to their own individual elements, we get a series of forms similar to fig. , and, applying these as elements of design, produce results similar to fig. , where at (a) we have an orderly arrangement of the obtuse angle shown at (a) in fig. , at ( )) a combination of the quadrants shown at (b) fig. . § elements of ornament. in fig. , and at (c) a similar combination of the ogee curves, shown at (c) in fig. . , straight lines alone may be r combined almost (‘ m) without limit, as shown in fig. ; and a combination of curves and straight lines, or curves, straight lines, and spirals, gives a great ( ) flo. fit. 'fig. . variety of forms, which can be introduced and combined to form an unlimited series of patterns. ' \vv/ ' > s\ (b) o fig. . . brush decoration of pottery.—we have been considering so far only linear patterns as were found in pre~ historic pottery when pottery was ornamented chiefly by incising the soft clay with a hard point. in later periods, however, pottery was decorated by means of the brush, and, elements of ornament. § as has already been pointed out, the use of this employment led to much excellence in ornamental art. it will now be readily understood how the combination of a few brush marks produced such important historic forms as the greekpalmette and honeysuckle ornament, and the fleur-de-lis and other devices common in medieval heraldry. in the first instance we considered the development of linear design in pottery decoration; then the application of pottery design to surface decoration and an analysis of forms that these arts produced; and, finally, a production of new forms from the elements of the original ones. if we now follow out the same idea and reproduce these forms with the variety that can be given them through brush decoration, we introduce an entirely new lot of expressions that linear decoration is incapable of carrying forth. natural ornament. . union with geometrical rnament.—-history shows that, as civilization advanced, greater ability for the expression of ornamental design was developed, and that mere geometrical design was found insufficient. natural forms were therefore resorted to in order to add new fea- tures to the preexisting forms, and this was done in such a way that the new elements should harmonize with the old. the natural representations, though imitations of nature, were not pictorial copies, but modifications to suit their pur- pose, or, as we now consider it, conventional renderings; and it is the union of these two principles—the imitative and the inventive—that has given rise to the most impor- tant styles of ornamental art. therefore, in applying natural forms to decoration, the student must always guard against the tendency to run into a pictorial representa- tion, as pictorial forms do not harmonize with the older geometrical lines that may be called on to serve with them. forms adopted from nature must be adapted by a judicious conventionalism. u]- c? elements of ornament. conventionalism in ancient art. . kinds of conventionalism.——in historic ornament we find two kinds of conventionalism: first, the eonven- tionalism of principles or ideas, and second, the conven- tionalism of facts. the first deals only with the principles or ideas of growth common to a number of classes of plants or objects, and not representative of any specific form. the second deals with the individualizing of particular plants or objects, giving a more or less geometrical rendering of them. . egyptian conventionalism.—for instance, the art of the egyptians, being purely symbolic, bound them to the conventionalism of facts, and in using their favorite flowers—the lotus' and papyrus—in decorative art, they did not copy them pictorially, but con- ventionalized them in such a manner that they readily conveyed the idea of the type and at the _ same time obeyed the rules of their geometrical foundation. in fig. the papyrus is shown at (a) and the lotus at (b), in their natural forms. in fig. is shown a border based on the primi- m tive zigzag of prehistoric ornament, and decorated at (a) with a conventional (“ "’ (°) rendering of the lotus fm' ' and at (b) with a conven- tional rendering of the papyrus, while at (c) is shown the lotus flower with its curved outline as we see it in later egyptian art after the curve of the zigzag had been evened up, as heretofore shown in fig. . fig. d. . greek conventionalism. the art system of the greeks, however, was of the other kind of conventionalism— elements of ornament. § that of principles or ideas. greek art not being symbolic, there was no necessity to represent particular plants (though at times they did so), and usually in their ornament we find principles expressed without indicating any particular natural type. - . in fig. is shown an ornament found as a border on many vases. its structural line is undoubtedly a develop- ment of the zigzag, while the leaf forms owe their origin to the limitations of brush work, and the general character of the orna- ment is indicative of a. class of running plants, but expressive of no par- ticular plant. another point observable in greek art is the way in which the scrolls are decorated, which, though based on a principle of vegetation, do not imitate any particular type. in fig. is shown an example of greek foliated orna- ment; it will be noticed that the principles there expressed are based on certain ideas derived from the vegetable world. in fig. is shown a branch of a shrub from nature, and it fig. . fig. . fig. . will be observed that the part of the shrub above the branches is smaller than the part of the shrub below the branches, and that there is a considerable thickening of the (‘ -) elements of ornament. part where the main stem and the branching stem unite. the greek ornament in fig. is simply a development of this principle, and does not imitate the plant at all, but ornaments the idea. ' . development of leaves.—following the general growth and development of plants comes the consideration of their leaves; these should be studied systematically, accord- ing to their develop- ment. such study will show that in spite of the apparent irregu- larity of leaf form there is a regular order in their outlines. it has already been shown that leaves develop according to some geo- metrical principle, and it will be found that the majority of leaves or leaf clusters may be enclosed within a circle or an fig. . ellipse, as shown in fig. ; and a continuance of this prin- ciple to the study of flowers will show that the top views of many flowers are governed by the same geometrical figure, as shown at (a), fig. , where the buttercup, daisy, and elements of ornament. § phlox are shown, while at (b) the side views of these flowers are enclosed within a triangle. . geometrical forms in nature—the study of nature will show that this principle can be carried out exten- sively, even to the fruit or seeds of the various plants; and a careful study of individual forms and their details will enlighten the student to many ideas that can be reduced to 'a geometrical principle and thereby become conventional- izcd, while other facts observable in nature can also be con- ventionalized to give a closer representation of the form. conventional ornament. . natural forms in deslgn.—\ve will now try to show how the study of nature can be applied in ornamental design. suppose we return to fig. and take the design worked out at (a) and decorate it with forms from nature. seat“ h% r; rd i& w real , fig. . % % % lve will surround the extremities of the radiating lines with figures derived from the study of nature, such as the edges of some flowers, and produce a design somewhat as shown in fig. . a similar treatment of (c), fig. , will cir elements of ornament. produce a design somewhat as shown in fig. . fig. is based on the development of (a), fig. , and fig. is a development of (d), fig. . . now, instead of dividing our sur- face up into rectan- gles, as we did in figs. , , etc., we will let the out- line of some natural form govern the subdivision; and in fig. we have a pattern where the contour of a five- lobed leaf is used as the governing principle of the outline, within which other floral forms are used to form a surface decoration. this, it will immediately be observed, is the method of using natural forms practiced by oriental artists, and the pattern shown in fig. is strongly sug- gestive of arabian art. for instance, at (a), fig. , is shown a spray of leaves from nature, while at (b) is an arabian design based on the out- w w line of this spray of leaves. fig. . . arrangement of ornament in indian art.—in indian art a favorite way of spacing out the orna- ment was after the manner shown in fig. , where the leai form is evidently of the lotus type. diapers in indian art are often designed as shown in fig. , where there is no attempt made to represent any particular plant, but simply gs elements of ornament. an application of principle s. thus, we see that the conven- tionalism of principles is almost unlimited in its extent, and qc e , e . fig. . stews > @ t < t t a q we will now consider the con ventionalism of facts. ; convention- alizlng : plant forn .—take, for in- stance, any plant suit- able for the purpose, and adapt it to orna- ment. we are not going to make a pic- ture of it, but study its characteristics, par- ticularly those that distinguish it from other plants, and idealize the original. it will be necessary to examine more than one specimen of the selected plant, because a peculiarity or accidental mark in one individual may not be found in another, and what we then require is a knowl- edge of the details and characteristics common to the entire family or kind to which the chosen speci- men belongs. this knowl- edge can be acquired only by long and continued , study of plant analysis, as a limited study is likely to render an untrue repre- sentation. . realism and conventionalism.-—to copy nature as she is presented to us, with all the accidents and defects, would be to render her realistically. to correct nature by knowledge derived from the study of all her works in each § elements of ornament. class, would be to treat her naturally. to reduce the result of these studies to a principle that expresses a simple fact with the fewest possible lines, as was done by fig. . the egyptians with their lotus blossom, is to treat nature conventionally. for instance, at (a), fig. , is shown an ivy leaf sketched from nature. it cannot be considered as ideal or natural, because its shape is not even the average shape of a number fig. . of leaves; therefore, (a) is a realistic drawing. at ( )), how- ever, is shown what might be considered a composite picture of a number of leaves possessing all the corrections of irreg- ularities found in the entire class. this is a naturalistic ren- dering of the ivy leaf, and the reduction of this leaf to a elements of ornament. § pentagonal form, shown in fig. , reduces it to the simple expression of an idea, and presents the ivy leaf in a most conventional form. . consideration of purpose. the extent,however, to which the modification of the details must be carried in order to apply a plant form in design must be determined by the purpose of its applica- tion, whether the design is to be free or severe. if the design is to be severe, the geometrical rendering shown in fig. will be most serviceable, but, if the design is to be free, the naturalistic form shown at ( ), fig. , may be used. the form shown at (a) with all its shadings and gradations, so strongly characteristic of the growing plant under certain conditions of lighting, is never suitable to ornament. fig. . . taste in conventionalism.-—now let us consider this application in fig. . at (a) is shown the application of the flower to the primi- tive design illustrated at (e) in fig. . the flattened curves of the flowers and leaves in the natural repre- sentation as shown in fig. are arranged at (a), fig. , stiffly, in order to harmonize with the severe character of the design. but the char- acter of the plant is maintained, because its main features (a) fig. . § elements of ornament. have not only been adhered to, but have been empha- sized. observe the indented ends of the petals, the serrated edges of the calyx, and the acutely lobed characteristic of fig. . the leaves. at ( ), fig. , however, the lines forming the basis of the pattern are composed of curves and do not demand so severe a treatment of the ornamenting plant, and the flower is rendered in a freer and more naturalistic manner than was possible in the previous case. . thus, it will be seen that the conventionalized rendering of a natural object requires careful consideration as to the extent to which the geometrical rendering shall have influence, and the idea that conventional rendering is sim- ply a geometrical rendering, without consideration of the properties and application, is entirely wrong. fig. . elements of ornament. § elements of ornament. classification of elements. . although good ornament is possible with the sim- plest forms and materials, it is undoubtedly true that the higher the form of decorative art, the nobler must be the elements of which it is composed. the elements of orna- ment are therefore drawn from a great many different sources, but may be classified in a general way under two distinct heads—the artificial and the natural. these may again be subdivided, for the sake of convenience, into six subordinate classes—gmmetrz'ml, arr/zz'tectural, industrial, wage/able, animal, and the human figure. . under the subject of geometrical ornament, we include frets, traceries, diapers, interlacings, etc., together with those forms that are so simply developed in the orna- ment of the savage races. in architectural ornament, we include columns, entablatures, pediments, cartouches, etc. industrial ornament may be considered to include all musical instruments, vases, spears, and other arms, as well as laces, ribbons, etc. vegetable ornament embraces designs from plant life—leaves, flowers, fruits, festoons, various rosettes, etc. —while under the animal classification we have quadrupeds, fishes, birds, insects, and reptiles, as well as such imaginary figures as griffins, dragons, etc. the human figure used in design includes both natural and mythological representations, the terminals of foliage designs used in the renaissance periods, the caryatids used in classic art, as well as certain creations in the mind of man, such as sphinxes, atlantes, mermaids, etc. geometrical eleiments. . frets.—the simplest form of geometrical elements we find in the frets, which throughout all ages and with all peoples seem to have been a favorite method of ornamenting § elements of ornament. flat surfaces. they are used largely for borders, for which they are eminently fitted, but diapers are also formed of them in japanese and egyptian art. in fretwork, the pattern and the ground are usually equally spaced, but this need not always be the case, as a strong effect is sometimes obtained by making a variation in this respect, as shown at (a), fig. . another variation that may be attained in frets is accomplished by changing ~ the formation of the figure that forms their governing outline. it is not necessary that this figure should be square or even rectangular, as is clearly illustrated at (b) and (c), the former being a parallelogram in the form of each section of its pattern, and the latter developed on the intersection of a series of diagonal lines, this being more characteristic of ornamental work, and suitable for flat or inclined surfaces. the introduction of curved lines in this class of work, either in conjunction with straight lines or entirely by themselves, leads us to various interlaced pat- terns, including the guilloche and basketwork. . the study of geometrical ornament is of particular value on account of the elements that lie at the base of the elaborate and intricate patterns that oriental artists and the middle-age mosaic workers so freely indulged in. \vith a thorough understanding of geometrical ornament and the possibilities of geometrical arrangement, the designing of complex and intricate patterns becomes a comparatively simple task. architectural elements. i . construction allied with beauty—next in the order of our subdivision we take up architectural ele- ments, and we must consider that architecture properly elements of ornament. § comprehended is the art of construction allied with beauty --not construction made beautiful by superadded decora- tion, but construction with beauty incorporated with it. in all the best periods of ornamental art, it has been architec- ture that has afforded the greatest field for its development; and in pottery, stained and painted glass, ironwork, jewelry, and the decoration of pilasters, shafts, etc., architectural construction has had a most marked influence. in decorated designs, certain architectural forms have been used in their pure and simple form, but most fre- quently they have been modified by imagination so as to bring them in harmony with other details with which they are associated. hence, in some forms of ornament, we find but a suggestion of architecture, while, in others, a distinctive characteristic. . adaptation of architectural forms.—in adapt- ing architectural forms to a surface design, it is entirely unnecessary that the stiffness and structural rigidity that is demanded in architectural practice should be maintained in the surface pattern, because the same structural conditions do not exist. there is no physical weight to be provided for, and, in the decoration, the introduction of the appear- ance of weight is all that is necessary so long as the eye is satisfied. the representation of a frieze may be taken from a carved pro- totype, but the details of the relief expressed in the original carving need form no part of the textile or other surface design, the element of beauty lying in the direction and proportioning of the lines only; the frieze may there- fore be reduced to a simple sur_ face treatment. the same may be said in the design of an iron grille c (a) fig. . § elements of ornament. either for a railing or for a gate. the design should be influenced if not governed by some characteristic of a simi- ilar detail in its original material. for instance, the design of the fence panel shown at (a), fig. , is clearly copied in its general outline from the stone baluster of the classic balustrade shown at ( ). the treatment of the head-piece over the gateway shown at (a), fig. , is clearly developed fig. . from the broken pediment characteristic of certain renais- sance work shown at ( ). these details as reproduced in iron are not copies of the original, but simply ornamental forms founded on a principle of earlier construction. in the same manner a well-designed iron railing is influenced in its proportions and composition by the architectural orders and classic proportions for balustrades. . the volute scroll.—some of the ornamental details derived in architecture and applied in decorative art will now be considered as to their origin and proper treat- ment. there is, for instance, the little volute scroll so characteristic of the corinthian column as it curls out under the corner of the abacus. the gracefulness of this feature and its apparentvstrength render it particularly adaptable in setting out friezes and other purely ornamental arrange- ' ments where the qualities of grace and strength are to be elements of ornament. § combined, as shown in fig. , where afrieze is designed fig. . using one of the forms of scroll shown in fig. , all of ffff fig. . which have been taken from the capitals of the various modifications of the corinthian. s (fl) (b) fig. . § elements of ornament. v . the ca.rtoueh.—the cartouch is another archi- tectural detail that enters largely into decorative design; it owes its origin to the ancient use of paper or parchment labels for inscriptions and badges. the margins of these labels were usually cut in some ornamental shape and afterwards curled into scroll forms of an ornamental char- acter. this led to a systematic develop- ment, and, subsequent- ly, in conjunction with interlaced ornament, produced a new kind of decorative work that we usually term cart-ouch work. this element is invaluable to the designer, both in its capacity as a filling-in treatment for an uninteresting piece of background, and as a strengthening element to the general composition. at (a), fig. , is shown one of the earliest and simplest forms of this cartouch work, while at (b) is shown the paper from which it is cut. in figs. and are shown examples of advanced and more complicated cartouches, developed from the same general principle. it is easy to understand the develop- ment of the cartouch form into the carved work shown in fig. , where a shield-shaped cartouch, with its curled and ornamental edges, is carved in relief with the human figure. in fig. is shown a further elements of ornament. § development of the ornament, in order to convert it into a frame, as was done during the period of the italian renaissance. the general form varied, but became more elaborate in design as the renaissance spread into france and germany. industrial elements. . association with architectural elements.—the industrial elements of design are not widely separated from the architectural class, and are considered here under a different heading simply as a matter of convenience. indus- trial objects, such as tools, armor, musical instruments, etc., are used in various ways in decoration, usually for purely symbolic purposes. these articles are usually introduced purely from an esthetic sense, with no other purpose than to please the sense of vision, and are therefore arranged to present to the best advantage the beauty of their forms. . symbolism.—in the symbolic use of these details, it should always be remembered that there are two ideas associated with nearly all symbols—one, the idea of recall- ing something to the memory; the other, the expression of an entirely new idea, or the illustration of one. thus, the latin cross may stand as an expression or as a symbol of the christian faith, or it may act as a reminder of the crucifixion of christ. another case is where the musical instrument, the lyre, so frequently used to express the idea of music, may with equal propriety set forth a reminder of the ancient use of that instrument in the classic musical entertainments. . prehistoric emblems—at (a), fig. , is shown a prehistoric emblem of god. it had its origin almost undoubtedly in early sun worship, which fact is attested by the circle, and the survival of this form is seen in the halo, or nimbus, painted over the heads of the saints during the middle ages. at ( ) we have the egyptian symbol of divinity, but of a more complex character. the circle is § elements of ornament. still retained but is supported by outstretched wings, indica- tive of sovereignty and ubiquity of the deity. the scara- baaus of the egyptians, shown at (c), was a detail that appeared frequently in their designs. at (d) we have the nimbus, or halo, characteristic of the christian symbol of glory, and at (r), (f), (g), and ( :) we have four forms of (e) ( ) fig. b. crosses known under the names of the latin cross at (e), the greek cross at (f), the cross of st. andrew at (g), and the maltese cross at (/ ). at ( ) is shown the old symbolic monogram of christ, composed of the two greek letters of his name x (c ) and p ( ), with a (alpha) and q (omega), the first and last letters of the greek alphabet, added to indicate his eternal character. . these few forms will serve to illustrate the extent to which symbolism enters into modern ornamental design, and alittle study and thought will bring to the student‘s mind and attention numerous other examples of the same kind. natural elements. . vegetable forms—of the elements of design that are taken directly from nature, our first consideration will naturally be the vegetable forms. here the material presented to the designer is not only unlimited in style, but is easy of adaptation to all his requirements. elements of ornament. § in using plant forms for design, there is material for the designer in every part of the growth—the roots, stalk, leaves, flowers, and seed all contain details that may sug- gest ideas to the designer. while there may be nothing of great beauty in the root of a flower itself, yet there is always sufficient detail of importance there, and, if properly studied, can give rise to beautiful ideas. . thickening of stem at points of departure. in all good ornament of a flowing character, no matter how conventionally it may be arranged, it has always been the practice that there should be a thickening of the stem at the point of departure of the two reversed growths, as shown at (a), fig. ; or, if more than one starting point is used, a stop is usually intro- duced between the two sections of design that are run- ning together, as at (b). . botanical principles in design. now let us see how the application of some of these principles of growth can be proper- ly considered in orna- mental design. let us study the botanical aspect for a moment. we have in botany § elements of ornament. a term called inflorescence, which is the arrangement or growth of flowers on the stem, the simplest form of which is shown at (a), fig. . taking its principle of growth and not copying in any way the specimens, we can introduce it in the design shown at (c), where it formsa per- fectly proper termination with the scroll, with which it har- monizes, as well as with the longitudinal character of the border pattern. at ( ) is shown another form of inflores- cence, and at (d) is shown its application to a scroll orna- ment as before. . there are many different characteristics of botanical growth, each of which is capable of furnishing an idea that can be carried out as simply as the above, and always to good advantage, in the product of satisfactory designs. animal elements. . frequent use in design.—animal elements have always been used in ornamental art in a more or less naturalistic manner, and, though these forms are more diffi- cult to treat ornamentally than are inanimate forms, the ancient artist used them frequently, as animal forms will increase the interest in any composition. in celtic orna- ment, for instance, elements from the animal world are introduced even with the purest geometrical designs, and we find down to the present day that conventionalized rep- resentations from the animal world are most conspicuous details of heraldry. in certain periods of art, animal forms were preferred even to the vegetable forms, as man in his early condition had a closer interest in certain classes of beasts that aided him in his struggle for existence, such as the horse, rein- deer, dog, etc. his admiration for them lay more in his comprehension of their usefulness than in his admiration of their form, as his chief business in life at that time was the provision for his natural wants and his own protection. elements of ornament. § . imaginary beast-s.——in later periods, when man arrived at an easier state of living, he became more sensi- tive to the beauty of the world, and it is then that we have the naturalistic rendering of animal form giving way to more conventional representations, such as are found in the imaginary beasts, like griffins, dragons, and chimeras. throughout the history of art, the formation of any style of ornament depends largely on some preceding style, and the earliest form of development that we have must necessarily have arisen from the geometric, or a combination of some later form with an earlier geometric form. this combination of form naturally leads to a combination of conventional ideas, and we have the union of the attributes of one animal with those of another. we have already considered the two kinds of conventionalism that can exist—one, the conventionalism of facts, and the other, the conventionalism of ideas. . conventionalizing animal forms.—in the con- ventionalizing of animal forms, it is usual to express the fm. ‘ . idea by means of a symbolic representation and the fact by a conventional rendering of the animal. to make this more clear, we will take, for instance, the griffin, shown in fig. , which is composed of the body of the lion and the head and wings of a bird, and is usually symbolic of § elements of ornament. watchfulness, strength, alertness, and swiftness. vt’e find this figure on the piers of gateways, and it was often used by the greeks to adorn certain portions of their temples. in this representation, we conventionalize the idea by representing it symbolically, the eagle’s head and wings and the expression of the added ears being symbolic of watch- fulness, alertness, and swiftness, whereas the lion’s body is symbolic of strength. the conventionalized facts we find in the reduction of these emblems to a form by which they can be combined in one figure. . sphinx, wivern, ete.-other figures of this char- acter are the sphinx, shown in fig. !), which combines the human head with the body of the lion—symbolic of intelli- gence and strength; the wlvern, shown in fig. , which con- sists of a sort of winged serpent with a bird’s head and legs, and carries the same idea as the griffin, with the addition of wis- dom indicated by the ser- pent's body, and alertness during the nocturnal hours from the batslike form of its wings. another figure of this character, which is of greek elements of ornament. § origin, is the chimera, shown in fig. . this figure is supposed to typify a volcanic mountain in greece, which, according to various legends, was infested with lions at the top, and around the middle with goats, while the foot of the mountain abounded in venomous snakes. the chimera therefore combining the forms of the lion, goat, and ser- pent, from whose mouths issued flames and deadly gases, became the symbol of terror and devastation. the dragon shown in fig. has ever been an emblem of the evil forces of the natural and moral world. it com- fig. . bines in its characteristics the litheness and repulsiveness of the lizard and serpent, the swiftness of action charac- teristic of various winged creatures, and the fierceness and § elements of ornament. belligerency of the carnivorous animals from the form of its teeth and claws. to intensify its evil appearance, it is fre- quently represented as belching flames. there are numerous other animals of a mythical char- acter that have their origin purely in the conventionalism of some idea, and the reduction of numerous animal forms to the conventional rendering is almost unlimited in its application. . difficulty of adapting animal forms. in the case of animal forms, it is not so easy to adapt them to the requirements of ornamental design as it is the free and varied growth of plants. the latter have a multitudinous repetition of parts that enables the designer to adapt them without violence to nature, while animal forms have a proscribed and limited number of parts that narrows the limit of their employment and presents difficulties in the way of their successful adaptation. it is therefore necessary that ani- mal forms should be analyzed in the same manner that plant forms have been analyzed in this course of study, in order to learn the characteristic lines of their compo- sition and reduce them to a form capable of conventional rendering. . it is comparatively easy to draw accurately any animal form, and yet such a form is likely to be utterly unfit for decorative purposes, while a less accurate repre- sentation may be highly suited to decorative work; and we will find that the animal forms usually seen in the designs of the more barbaric nations are better suited to ornamental art than the realistic renderings of the later periods. . birds and running ornaments—birds also may be combined successfully with running ornament, as they are not only graceful in themselves, but are pleasantly associated with all plant growth, and they can be arranged so that their lines flow with the lines of the ornament and harmonize with it perfectly. certain quadrupeds can thus be treated also, but not always so readily. elements of ornament. § at (a), fig. , is shown a border ornament consisting of a foliated design, through which a dog is seen running after a bird, while at (b) is a rough outline of this same design fig. . showing how the curves of the dog’s body are in harmony with those of the ornament, and how the introduction of this detail is so suitable in the combination shown. again, at (a), fig. , is shown a design where the bird alone is introduced, while at (b) the outline drawing of it shows the arrangement of the foliated design and its rela- (b) fig. . tion to the bird form, together with the line of curvature that makes the two details harmonize, the latter being shown in dots. fig. is taken from a stone carving of the sixteenth century. § elements of ornament. ‘ . wings in ()rnament.—while we are considering the introduction of bird forms it will be wise for us to con- sider the subject of wings and the introduction of wings in ornament. there are few details of animal form that have been so extensively introduced in various convention— alized forms. to represent both ideas and facts, as the wings ‘ of birds and bats. though the bird’s wing is composed of flesh and feathers, and the bat’s wing is made up of a skele- ton framework between the parts of which a thin skin is stretched, the principle governing the outline of each is practically the same, and, in addition to this, it might be noted that the structure of wings and that of the human arm is very closely allied. at (a), fig. , is shown the outline of a bird’s wing, while at (b) is shown the outline of a bat's wing, and at (c), an outline of the bone construction of the human arm. the relative arrangement of these details will show their relation in structure, while fig. shows three forms of elements of ornament. § bird's wing, differing materially in outline, owing to the arrangement of the feathers, but based on precisely the same skclcton construction as is shown at (a), fig. . . proportions f wings—at (a), fig. , the wing represented is that of a common sparrow, while (b) shows the pigeon's wing, and (c), that of the sea swallow. it will be observed that in the order they are named these wings are fig. . from birds each of whose flight is more prolonged than the former—the sparrow, flying but short distances; the pigeon, usually capable of traveling a mile or more on the wing; while the sea swallow is flying a majority of the time. the relative extent of the outward extremity of the wing, it § elements of ornament. will be observed, increases with the flying qualities of the bird. in apply- ' -' ~ )- ' ing these wing forms to design, it is fre- quently necessary to take these details into consideration. . application of wings. —we have already considered the application of the wing in the design of the winged globe shown at ( ;), fig. , but its , , : l . , _, application to other " x " ‘ forms we will consider . ; .- \ .,.~ , ,fi _. here. in fig. is shown the character- ' ‘ ' " istic egyptian hiero- ._ i . glyph of the goddess fig- . neith, who carries in each hand a symbol, and whose out- ’ , stretched wings typify her world-wide sovereignty. in more modern applica- tion, we find the use of wings in the greek sphinx, shown in fig. , where the treat- ment is less conventional than in the egyptian style, and the possession of the wings distinguishes this sphinx from the one of egyptian design. fig. shows a still more modern application, where, in a female figure, the wings replace the arms and are outstretched in the \ ‘ § elements of ornament. illustrated in the forms of the pheasant's feather shown at (b), fig. . fig. . . insects in design.—the use of insects in decora- tive design is not as extensive as of birds, though the mark- ings of the wings of some of them, particularly the butterfly, are easily applicable in some characters of design, as shown at (a), fig. ‘ , where a border is designed on principles taken from the butterfly's wing illustrated at (b), and the simple mosquito, illustrated in a conventional rendering at elements of ornament. § (a), fig. , is easily applicable to a diaper ornament, as shown at (b). there is no limit to the extent to which these m m,“ hist sea fig. . forms may be varied, or combined with plant forms, to pro- duce any given variety of ornament. . fishes in ornament.—the use of fishes in orna- mental art is somewhat limited. with the exception of the dolphin, we have very few historic representations of this class of animal; but, in order that there may be a thorough understanding of the details that must be considered in the designing of any fish-like form, there is illustrated in fig. \¥_\ a typical fish, with the .~"\k\l\_hl(a) five principal fins that x y m) i \ exist in nearly every example, though they a 'i i v i may be varied in form. at (a) is the dorsal fin; at (b), the neutral “ ' ' fin ; and at (c), the per- ml fin. the tail is technically known as the caudal fin, and the fin between the ventral and the tail is termed the anal fin. each of these fins is developed to a greater or less degree in different fishes, in some of which it is divided so as to pre- sent two fins. for instance, it is not unusual to find two or more dorsal or two or more ventral or anal fins on one fish, and in rendering them for conventional treatment, it would be well to bear in mind a certain type of fish from which to study, and to preserve the characteristics of this fish in the rendering. § elements of ornament. v square a b c d, and the horizontal and vertical lines dividing this square into sixteen smaller squares determine the posi- tion of important parts of the body. thus, the distance b e is one-fourth the height of the body, and the line passes through the middle of the chest; the dis- tance f is one-eighth the height of the body, and the line \-/ \( fig. ?. passes under the chin; the distance f g is one-tenth the height of the body, and the line passes tangent to the chin and through the roots of the hair; f /z is one-sixteenth the height of the body, and marks the distance of the eyes above the chin; while fz' is one thirty-second the height of the body, and marks the distance of the bottom of the nose above the chin. it will be here observed that the arms extended horizontally measure the same distance across, elements of ornament. § side view of the leg is composed of a series of convex lines, these should not be given too much prominence over the general proportion of the whole limb, as such a rendering would give a result somewhat as shown atl(a), fig. ; while a closer observation of this whole member would lead to the discovery that, notwithstanding the existence of convex curves in the shin, the line in the front of the leg is con- cave, as shown at (b), while that of the back is convex. (a) (d) ( } the same may be said of the forearm, which is frequently drawn as shown at (c), fig. ' , with the inside of the fore- arm convex, in order to show the softness of the curves at that point; but, as a matter of fact, if its general contour were taken into account, it would be found to be concave, as shown at (d), and a proper rendering of it would be more as shown at (c). the student should carefully analyze these details in studying the human figure, not only as a guide to its truth- ful representation, but also in order to study the details of its conventionalism to arrive at a proper principle for its general design—a principle that can be enlarged upon after the main outlines have been established. ' . difficulty of free rendering.—in considering the application of the human figure to decorative purposes, the same rules hold good as for decoration with foliage, but its rendering is, of course, more difficult, as we cannot handle it as freely as we do the plants. the human figure has to be taken in its entirety, without exaggerating its § elements of ornament. structure in any way (except for the purpose of caricature, which does not enter into this course of study), and its elementary lines must be thoroughly comprehended by the student. details of the human figure have been combined with animals, as has here- illiiiifiiif]’l,'ihill|llllilmliillwm]wi" tofore been shown iiil ‘ _ lilli,“ i/ q ". ‘ . 'i iq and illustrated, as in the sphinx, etc., and we will presently have occasion to give ! other examples. the combination of the human figure with foliage is character- istic of many designs of the renaissance period, where the lower portions of the body were permitted to terminate in leaf-like forms and enter into the foliated ornament of an arabesque or panel, as shown in fig. . . this style of treatment probably grew out of a development shown in fig. , where at (a) is shown a half figure that might appear more suitable to the filling of a fig. bl. certain space than the full-length figure. the lower part of the figure is covered by drapery, the elaboration of the folds elements of ornament. § of which brings it to the form of a design shown at (b), which further elaboration brings to a foliated form as at (c), and subsequent renderings form a part of the figure as illus- trated at (( ). attention is simply called to this here to illus- trate a possible progress and growth and to show the ration- alism of foliated terminations under certain circumstances. . human figures as supports.—the use of the human figure as a support in the place of a column, or occa- ;'_;||i§iiie fig urn-yr rm . c sionally, with artificial terminations, under brackets, is shown in fig. , which is taken from one of the cai'yatids § elements of ornament. used in the north porch of the erechtheum at athens, while in fig. is shown a front and side view of the egyptian method of carving human figures as supports, though, in the latter case, it will be observed that the figure does not actually support any of the superimposed load, but simply rests against a pier. the greek artists, apparently appreciating the inappropriateness of the human figure to act as a column and permanently support something super- imposed, increased the proportions and gave them a strong architectonic feeling. . during the renaissance period, the use of figures as supporting mem- bers was very much misunderstood, and the combination of these elements with the attempt at grace- fulness of line led to such misconcep- tions as shown in fig. , where the curved dotted line shows the real line of support through the figures, and, at the same time, gives an expression of weakness to the detail as an archi- tectural member. a comparison of this with the greek figure shown in fig. will readily illustrate the error made by the more modern designers. fig. . fig. . elements of ornament. § the use of half figures, called termini, is characteristic of the renaissance period, an example of which is shown in and, although the latter method is fig. . n great load should be superim- posed upon them, in order that their appli- cation may be harmo- nious. . application of “hugs—in the application of wings and feathers to the human figure, egyp- tian art usually at- tached the wings below the arms, as shown in fig. , while the assyrians usually attached them behind the shoulders, as shown in fig. , the less rational one from an anatomical structure, it is the one that survives at § elements of ornament. the present day, and is usually used in modern work. fig. is taken from greek vase paintings, and shows the greeks' idea of wing treatment; while the renaissance example shown in fig. possesses an exaggerated outline, the curves of which in no way appear to agree with the hidden structure, though the development of the wings in the place of arms is much more rational than the form shown in fig. . . fabulous creatures. -— many fabulous crea- tures—partly human and partly animal—have been created during the periods of grotesque art, and to greek art we are indebted for most of these mythical creatures, as their cen- tral idea was the glorification of the human form. greek mythology had so many deities representative of different characteristics and ideas that separate gods and goddesses, illus- trative of separate con- ceptions, were indispensa- ble; and not only were lit- erature, arts, and sciences typified by a form of i ' a human being, but the ‘\ \ seas, the rivers, the moun- ' tains, the woods, the trees, \ , . and the rocks were all i - - we m \ representatively depleted v .- “mw §§ in some ideal form, and ‘ ,i\'\ even the natural devices ._ ' \k‘ and calamities of man- ‘ i ii " ‘ kind had some symbol in human guise. when these, however, were insufficient to properly express their ideas, the human form was combined with that of abird' or animal, or some reptile, in order to complete the symbol- ism as far as possible. therefore, in their personification pro. . elements of ornament. § of the free untrammeled woodland life, they gave to the figure of a man the legs and horns of a goat, to intensify the idea of wild freedom, and as a result we have the mytholog- ical forms of the satyr and pan illustrated in fig. . . greek sphinx.—’i‘he egyptian sphinx, being sym- bolic of the combination of intellect, wisdom, and power, is represented with the human head and the lion's body, as shown in fig. ; while the greek sphinx differs in form from that of the egyptian, as it is usually represented as being of the female sex and possessing wings. this sphinx by the greeks appears to have been adopted as the personi- fication of malignity combined with mystery, and to her is accredited the practice of propounding riddles to those that visited her and tearing to pieces all that failed to solve them. the gracefulness of the creature's form, however, caused it to become a favorite as an ornamental element, and it is used frequently in mural decoration and for the adornment of bronze tripods and other devices purely of an orna- mental character. . centaur. the combination of man and horse, called the cen- taur, was repre- sentative of a race of warriors cele- brated in greek mythology for their horseman- ship. their skill was so great that the rider and horse appeared as one; hence, the development of the idea shown in fig. . a similar device was the combined form of a fig. . § elements of ornament. woman and a horse, or, more frequently, of a woman and a deer, typifying the huntress, or a denizen of the forest. . medusa.—the head of medusa, shown in fig. , is emblematic and typical of the sensations of extreme fear and terror. according to greek mythology, medusa was the most celebrated of the gorgon sisters, who were origi- nally priestesses f athe- na, but having broken her vows of celibacy and ultimately marrying po- seidon, she was punished by the goddess athena, by having each of her beautiful wavy locks transformed into a ven— omous serpent, and her head thus assumed the horrible aspect depicted in the illus- tration. fig. . . license in designing the human figure. thus, the human figure is seen to have pervaded certain classes of ornamental design throughout all ages, but has been altered or modified in order to suit it to characteristic purposes and places, or its details better arranged to har- monize with other elements of ornament. the restrictions that influence and largely govern the use of certain ornamental forms in conventionalized design must all be considered 'of equal importance in the applica- tion of the human figure, and a truthful portrayal or realistic rendering is permissible only under the rarest circumstances of absolutely monumental work. practical design. principles involved in practical design. . the principles that are involved in the production of good repeating patterns are rtfz'lz'lz'on, rolllrasl, and t'arz'rly; balance, synmchry, and unity; inugi'ntz'aljzmclz'mz,- radiation and proportion; and growl/ , sfaliz'li/y, nylon; and films. . repetition. repetition in many respects is the most important principle in textile design, as an all-over repeat- ing pattern implies in itself the idea of repetition, and whereas there are many all-over designs that do not repeat, they are confined to hand work, such as rugs, embroidcrics, and other products beyond the scope of the designer for the loom or the press. ' . alternation.—in connection with repetition we have alternation, wherein the repetition consists of a form that duplicates itself alternately with another form, as shown in fig. . alternation is very useful in some cases when it is § for notice of the copyright, see page immediately following the title page. practical design. § used to vary repetition and avoid monotony. it produces a slight feeling of contrast combined with a feeling of con- tinuous variation, but it must not be confounded with the principles of contrast and variety, which are separate and distinct. . contrast. and var!ety.—-the feeling of contrast is best expressed in a design wherein the linear elements meet or cross each other nearly at right angles, as shown in fig. , and contrast is best effected by an arrange- ment of lines that brings about this con- dition, as shown in fig. , which is an ancient greek pattern wherein this prin- ciple dominates the entire design, all the lines being arranged to join each other nearly at right angles. the feeling of contrast is not confined entirely to designs fig. . ..i,;_j.?_; of a rigid character, and fig. illustrates an example wherein this principle is carefully handled in a design of a soft and flowing character. at a will be observed the main flowing fig. . § practical design. line broken by the scroll that crosses it at right angles, and, therefore, stands not only in contrast with it but also assists in giving a feeling of variety. variety is the very essence of a design and the principle that gives it brightness and prevents its monotony, and though the variety of design must not be so extensive as to rob it of its feeling of repose, there must be sufficient change to rest the eye from the observation of any par- ticular form. . symmetry and balance—symmetry and balance are principles that exist when the arrangement of ornament is such that the details on both sides of a line or point are fig. ‘l exactly repeated or duplicated, as in fig. , or are of equal value, as in fig. , the former being a symmetrical element, the latter a balanced element. . tangential junction.-—-tangential junction of lines, as we already know, is a detail depending on the close observation of nature, and is illustrated in several forms in fig. . radiation is also a principle that we have g; practical design. ‘ § already considered, and whether that radiation takes place from a point or a line is a matter to be decided according to the character of the ornament. growth is another principle derived - ' from observation of plant qt“ ----- ---" form, and the curves exist- ing in long slender leaves, “‘ ' ' such as that of the cattail and flag, or even blades of grass, are expressive of this principle. it , subordination is a principle that must be introduced into certain parts of a design in order to prevent monotony; there must be principal features and subordinate features, and if every detail is brought into equal prominence there will be neither contrast nor variety. in every good design there should always be a principal feature, such as a bright flower or group of flowers or of leaves, or of some other striking object, and the rest of the design should sink into the background and take a secondary place. . fitness—the question of fitness is simply the appli- cation of a certain class of design to certain materials. of course, it is evident that the style of design that would be suitable for a carpet would be utterly unsuitable for a printed cotton goods or a velvet, and would be out of place for printing on a fine silk. then, there is always the considera- tion of fashion—a subject that every designer is bound to be familiar with and governed by, although his good sense may at times be opposed to it; but designs are made for commercial purposes and the designer must bow to the' prevailing fashions even though his artistic nature rebel. therefore, a design should always be thought out or men- tally planned at first, and its style, scale, and character suited and fitted to the material and purpose in which it is to be carried out and for which it is to serve. § practical design. . proportion.——in connection with fitness we come to the principle of proportion, which is most difficult to decide upon, as, under it, the designer must make up his mind as to the relation between the lengths and breadths of the repeats, the scale of the pattern, etc. . unity.-—the last principle to be considered, per- haps, is unity, and in this we must sum up all the previous ones. however well the plan may be balanced and however well the natural formations and growths may be observed and adhered to, and thoroughly adapted though the design may be in scale and proportion to the material in which it is executed, it is of little value unless all these principles unite in a characteristic whole that prevents any one of them becoming unduly prominent or makes it appear that they are not bound together inseparably. planning the design. . characterlstlc of a design.~—it is always well to have a clear idea of what the main characteristics of a design are to be before the actual work of arrangement is begun. these characteristics will be influenced largelyby the mate- rial purpose of the finished fabric as well as the trend of the prevailing fashions. if, for instance, the design is to be woven in tapestry or other hanging, then it may be bold and rich, emphasized by the arrangement of strong and contrast- ing colors. but, on the other hand, if the design is for a dress fabric, it must be made to a much smaller scale and the colors be much more subdued. in the case of a dress fabric, it should always be borne in mind that the scale must be kept down, as some one is going to wear it; and, there being a comparative uniformity in the sizes of various people, we have a definite scale to work to. it has been shown that the most convenient size for a repeat in dress patterns is about % inches, as the folds of the dress and the numerous seams would destroy the effect of the repeat if it were made much larger. practical design. § . geometrical basis—it must always be borne in mind that it is absolutely necessary that the plan of any design that is to be reproduced by mechanical means, such as a printing block, must always have a geometrical basis, and the repeat must be governed by a regular geometrical figure. this figure is called the unil, and it is the govern- ing shape of the unit of the pattern; it must always be enclosed in itself, or in a multiple of itself, in a square or oblong whose dimensions correspond with the dimensions of the printing block from which the design is to be reproduced. ' this may be more clearly understood by reference to fig. (a), where the unit of the design and the size of ’ '\ , a“, k . _, (c) ( ) fig. . the repeat are identical, the small dark square indicating the unit after which the cards would have to be cut in weaving, and the dotted exterior square showing the size of the block from which the pattern would be produced in printing. at ( ’), however, the lozenge shape contains the unit of the design, and the complete repeat is composed of one whole diamond and four quarters, which together, as shown at abca', are contained in an oblong, this oblong being the repeat for which the cards would be cut in weaving. at ( ) is shown the manner in which this oblong would be treated § practical design. in a square if it were intended to reproduce the design by printing, the square there representing the printing block; while at (c), (e), and (f) are shown the methods of treating such forms as the triangle, hexagon, and ogee shape, which are considered in the same manner as was the lozenge. . unit and repeat—it is important that the student should always keep clearly in his mind the difference between the unit of a design and the repeat, and not confound one with the other. a comparison of all the details of fig. will show that the units are always made up of regular geometrical figures that fit together, leaving no interstices between them. this, of course, is a necessary characteristic that the unit must possess. the diamond, the square, and the oblong are the most useful shapes; but on general prin- ciples the lozenge or diamond is the best of all. . defective design.—as said before, it is necessary that a clear and definite idea should be possessed when a design is started, on which the subsequent building up can depend. in fig. are shown two renderings of the same style of ornament intended for the same purpose, though the one at (b) in no way fulfils the conditions. it is assumed that this is a design for a stripe in some piece of goods, and an irregular wavy line is drawn, from which spring a number of leaves and flowers, regardless of any preconceived order, except that the design must repeat beyond the lines ab and ed. the line, the leaves, and the flowers have no apparent relation to one another, nor to the border of the panel itself, and the three flowers at a acci- dentally fall together and form a straight line across the stripe, making a very awkward accentuation at the end of each repeat—a characteristic of repeating designs that the designer usually tries to conceal. . remedy for defects.—at (a), however, the same elements are used and show that, by a little consideration. § practical design. the design and adds to the impression that the floral orna- ment could not readily be removed without impairing its appearance. . the parent stem.—in fig. is shown a surface, or all-over, pattern somewhat of the same character as fig. , the limitations of which are precisely the same as those of the border. the principal line, or the main stem, is drawn first, and once located, the designer must determine whether this line is to form an essential detail of his design or simply to be a starting element. in many cases, the parent stem is inserted into a design solely to give some logical growth and provide some element that the flowers and leaves can spring from, but in no way forms an important part of the design itself, and might be removed without impairing the design ' the least. in this case, however, the parent stem is one of the most important factors and must be put in with care and thought. . principal feature. in all designs, or at least in nearly all, there should be some feature that by its promi- nent color, shape, or size is more prominent than the others, and it should be so placed that it will immediately attract the eye. such being the case, it is necessary that the means by which this attraction to the eye is attained must be con- sidered before the design is started. a design without a leading feature is uninteresting and tiresome, and it natu- rally follows that if this leading feature is so important, it is necessary that it should be the most beautiful and the most interesting part of the design. in the present case, the repeat is first decided on and the wave line is carefully studied with the idea that it is to be a prominent detail in the finished design. its curve must be graceful, of good proportions, and so arranged that it will not interfere inharmoniously with its adjacent curves in the other repeats. the four large leaves in the corner of each repeat being intended for prominent features, should also be carefully drawn and placed in position. in general practical design. q'iij practice it would be found advisable to sketch the design in outline at first, as shown in fig. at (( ), because it is likely to be modified after the design is worked out and it would be a waste of time to try and work out the finished details at once. the next detail in the preparation of the design is the conventional flower in the center of the repeat; this should go in next, and it would seem advisable to place the flower at some point central between the four large leaves. the necessity of placing this flower in a central position can be readily seen by referring to fig. , where the design is the same as that shown in fig. , except that the flower is not fig. . in the center but thrown to one side, over one set of the leaves. the effect of this can be readily seen, that inas- much as the flower is removed from the center, the character of the pattern ceases to be of the all-over type, and resolves itself into a series of stripes. this does not absolutely spoil the design, as it would be considered all right if a striped pattern were wanted; but when an all-over pattern is wanted, this treatment is certainly all wrong. after the flower is § practical design. ] drawn in outline, the rest of the figure is blocked in as shown in fig. . effect of the repeat.—in all cases in laying out adesign, it is advisable to draw more than one repeat, as the student can then judge somewhat better the appear- fig. . ance of it when multiplied in the loom or the press. few but the most experienced designers can judge the prob- able efiect and know how to avoid faults that are likely to appear, unless several repeats are laid out in each direction. practical design. § having considered the preliminary arrangement of the plan for the repeat itself, we will now take up the different methods of securing this repeat, and consider the advantages of each case. drop pattern. . unit of the pattern.-~the drop pattern takes its name from a characteristic that requires the unit to be dropped one-half its length in order that adjacent members s s may properly match, and it has been suggested that the lozenge shape is best adapted as the figure constituting the unit of any pattern. in fact, though this shape is used as § practical design. the basis for nearly all repeating diaper patterns, it is almost indispensable in the construction of the drop pat- tern. every practical drop pattern, if properly analyzed, will be found with the lozenge as its fundamental form, though, as a rule, this shape is concealed in the superfluity of ornament. in fig. the lozenge shape does not appear at all, although it can be easily shown that. it is the govern- [a q ‘ y ‘ ,‘aae : i \m fig. . ing principle of this design. if we join the four central points of the four large five-lobed leaves, the resulting figure is lozenge-shaped, and a similar figure would be pro- duced by joining any four repeating points in the design,v as shown in fig. . practical design. § . the enclosing rectang e.—notwithstanding the fact that this lozenge shape is the governing principle of so many designs, it must not be forgotten that the practical working out of the pattern in the loom, or the printing of the pattern in the press, requires that the design s/zal/ be (vic/ d wit/tin a rrrlnlrgle, and the amount that has to appear in the design will be one complete lozenge and four quarter-lozenges in order to make up the rectangle. an exception to this rule, however, will be found in center ties and roll carpets, which will be considered later on. . symmetrical deslgns.—where a design is sym- metrical on both sides of a given center line, as shown in practical design. § dropped at e f g / , this rectangle representing another width of 'carpet roll that fits the first so as to make a perfectly connected design. thus it will be seen that the same points do not repeat in this design in less than twice the width of one roll, as may be seen at a’ and k, where '\"" "."."iri'm‘ {i‘ll 'iil‘iifi'l-i“ ,, |i||l\h| l, l , ;\|| h- ‘i helms“ iii ‘ lviilly‘l'illiteii-i, i ' " ' | ", h , il'l "“ ‘“ x||||t i, . p». m, - n n'i'il. % ,' ' .'.:i£ii,i, ,!" hi- ' . ‘l'\‘ .; “l '? “fill , .; fl;- ' ii .. k mp } ‘u ‘ ' ' " “ % satellite.atrium}: iiiljwimliw fig. . the flower at d is completed in the section at k inches away from it. if the plan were adopted for a side-to~side repeat, these forms would repeat every inches horizon- tally; but by means of the drop pattern we can, without additional labor or expense, produce a carpet design of apparently twice this width, and this same idea can be carried out in wall paper. § practical design. . waste in cutting. another advantage in the use of the drop pattern for carpets is that the chance of waste is considerably reduced during the process of cutting and fitting the widths together to suit the size of a room. this can better be understood by referring to fig. , where at (a) the drop pattern is shown as its repeats would recur in a (a) fig. . room; and at (b) the side-to-side repeating pattern appears as laid out upon the same room. this room is assumed to be ft. in. x ft., the narrower dimension requiring just six widths of -inch carpet to cover it. it will be seen at (a), that, beginning at the upper left-hand' corner and cutting off from the roll what is required for the length of the room, we will have four complete repeats and a little over, and in replacing this width to the right of this and laying off what is required for the second length of the room, there will be a little waste at each end, as shown at b and c. in the same manner, the same amount of waste occurs at dr and half as much at f g, while the breadths between, at i: and i, are cut to exactly cover the room in the same manner as the first one. looking now at the other arrangement at (b), we have the practical design. § same space carpeted with a pattern that does not drop, but matches from side to side, and it will be readily seen that the waste, as indicated at bade and f, is considerably more than the previous case, amounting to very nearly yards. of course, the proportions of this room are such as to make this rather an extreme case; but the fact remains that there is less waste with the drop pattern, because the repeats fit at half the height, and the greatest possible waste in any one room length of roll will be half the length of a repeat, while with a side-to-side repeating pattern nearly a whole repeat of waste is possible. on this account it is advantageous to keep the length of the repeat short whether the design drops or not, for with a long repeat there is much more waste in cutting than where the repeat is moderate. in fig. the repeat is entirely too long for economy, and had the lozenge form been turned to a horizontal position it would have been much more advantageous, inasmuch as the effort has been in the first place to make the repeat extend over two widths of carpet, and there is no good reason why the repetition in a vertical direction should be of any greater extent. . planning and drawing the design—it is always best to construct the lozenge shape so that its vertical and horizontal dimensions are equal to the vcrtical and hori- zontal dimensions of a full repeat, and then to sketch in the principal details and general lines. the leaf forms can then be filled in so that the upper right line of the lozenge will out these details in exactly the same form and position as the lower left-hand line, and the same may be said of the upper left-hand line and the lower right-hand line. in gen- eral practice, the best way of doing this is to sketch the form roughly on transparent paper or tracing cloth, with a soft pencil. these forms may then be gone over with a harder pencil on the reverse side and the pencil markings trans- ferred almost exactly uniform to any part. in the frequent references that we will make to tracing paper hereafter, we § practical design. will in all cases mean simply the drawing or tracing of a design on transparent paper and the transferring of the design by means of that tracing to other parts of the draw- ing. in this way the details of the general sketch may be multiplied and extended freely in every direction. when so multiplied and the forms appear to be well arranged and distributed, an exact drawing can be made by means of tracing paper and everything carefully drawn in its proper place. . striped effect in drop patterns—in the true drop pattern, the drop is always considered as half the height of the repeat; but it is not unusual to have a drop pattern of less than this, as, for instance, one-third the height of the repeat. this is shown in fig. at (a), while at (b) the if i - drop is only one-quarter of the height; but the result is never as satisfactory, as an even distribution is not so readily acquired and the comparative width of the repeat is greater. the bringing of the principal elements so much closer together is also likely to produce a striped effect as shown at practical design. § a b in fig. (a) and at ed in fig. ( ); whereas in (c), where the drop is half the height of the repeat, there is little or no tendency to get a striped effect, as the principal elements of the design are evenly distributed. the shorter the drop the stronger is the tendency to produce a pronounced stripe and increase the width of the repeat, and, therefore, the more expensive to work out without any compensating advantages regarded of value as ornament. for this reason it should be borne in mind that drop patterns of less than half the repeat are to be avoided if an even distribution of ornament is desired, and the tendency of any part of the ornament to run in stripes is to be obviated. turn-over h ethod. . advantage of the turn ()ver.—another method of planning a design is called the turn-over method, and for many reasons is very desirable. with this method of planning, faults can be avoided with greater certainty and the design is given an appearance of greater complexity, as the repeats alternating to the right and left are less evident to the eye than when running in but one direction. this is a most useful system of planning, and, when properly stud- ied, a design can be executed in which faults are least likely to occur; but the method is a most difficult one for the stu- dent to master, because when the unit of one repeat is reversed or turned over, the two units are likely to overlap in some of their details. . planning the turn ver.—in fig. is shown a turn-over design, with the geometrical constructions and the main lines on which the whole is based. the first consideration is the proportions of the repeat, shown at abcd, containing but unit and quarter-units surround- ing it. this constitutes the geometrical construction of our design. the next consideration is the character of the design itself, and if we'assume the ogee outline as shown in this case, we § practical design. must divide the top corner of the repeat into four equal parts, at f, g, , and draw in the ogee line f/z, in order to get any degree of accuracy. in fact, all that is required of this line is the portion from f to i, the other half being traced from it, the two parts being exactly the same. the other four portions may be traced in a similar manner. fig. . next, the large flower in the center of each repeat should be placed in position, and care must be taken that each alternate horizontal series of repeats is turned in a different direction—one whole series toward the right, and another whole series toward the left as shown—as no other arrange- ment will produce the effect. _ practical design. § in the first blocking out of the design, much time will be saved if the main features are sketched with a single line as shown in fig. , where the oval shape stands for the flower in the center of the unit. when these oval shapes have been repeated a sufficient number of times, the lines of the ogee at i? should be broken away from their regular direction, and the small flowers in each unit drawn upon these branchings. . elimination of faults.—~by this time the design has been advanced sufficiently to enable the designer to look over it carefully and see that none of its details is likely to overlap or go wrong in any way. it is, however, almost certain that some detail will overlap another when the orna- ment is first drawn and turned over on the adjacent dia- mond, and if such overlapping occurs, of course the design must be altered. if, however, the design develops satis- factorily, the detail of the principal element in the center may be repeated in the four corners, at a, , c, and d, and then the flowers distributed along the line kk may be sketched in place. even now though the design is finished in the last detail, it is wise to look over it thoroughly, as it is almost sure to require some alterations, lest when turned over one portion will come into conflict with another; and the line where the first lozenge joins the four adjacent ones may be so thickly ornamented as to appear heavy, or it may be so sparse that it requires filling. it is always at the points where these units join that the most skill is required in the arrangement. . turn-over-and-drop patterns—in some of its details the turn-over pattern is not unlike the drop; it requires unit and quarter-units to make up the whole repeat, and the unit contained in the whole lozenge is both turned over and dropped, so that in making the design it is necessary to trace off the first lozenge, reverse the tracing paper, and drop it to the adjacent lower one. in fact, were it not for a. § practical design. needless lengthening of the name, this style of design could better be termed the turn-over-and-drop pattern. . avoidance of faults—turnover designs are liable to the same fa’ults as are designs that go only in one direction, but not to such a marked degree. this partial avoidance of faulty lining is one of the advantages, as the turning over of the unit causes a zigzag effect rather than a line effect. an illustration of this effect is given in fig. , where at (a) a turn-over pattern is shown based on the wave line, and its unit is indicated by the lozenge shape fig. . in the center. looking at this rectangular repeat, it would be difiicult for even an expert designer to predict that the whole design, when printed and many times repeated, would appear faulty; but this faultiness becomes very evident when the design is executed and a large surface spread out before the eye as shown at ( )). if the design shown at (b) be held at arm's length and the eyes half closed. a white zigzag line will be perceived running systematically through the design from top to bottom, as marked at a a a, etc. § practical design. . selection of system of design.~tlle selection of the system of construction should not be made arbitrarily, but should always be decided after mature thought as to which would bring about the best result. the square pro- duces a repeat in the same distance both vertically and hori- zontally, and the rectangle gives us a repeat greater in one direction than the other, according to which way it is turned; the lozenge can be made to produce repeats in the same proportion as the square or rectangle, but produces an entirely different effect, as shown in fig. , where the same design is worked out on the system of the square as is worked out on the system of the lozenge in fig. . the former is much more severe than the latter, and the limits of the repeat are much more definitely marked. there is a tendency, too, toward the expression of a horizontal and practical design. § vertical system of lining in fig. that is not so apparent in fig. . it is therefore seen that for some conditions the fig. . square might be preferred to the diamond shape, while for other conditions the latter is preferable. . variety possible.-—on these geometrical bases an unlimited variety of designs may be developed from a simple sprig or spray to most elaborate combinations of interlaced wave lines and ogee forms. these may be roughly divided into spots, powderings, connected forms, or stripes, in which the repeats are made continuous by structural lines though the pattern may be made up entirely of geometrical forms. . simple spot designs.—in fig. is shown a, spot design, the plan of which is based on the diamond, as is very evident, and shows how valuable an arrangement the § practical design. diamond form is to us when much ornament is not a neces- sity. it should always be borne in mind that ornament is intended to beautify a material, and if the material will look better with very little ornament upon it and plenty of ground or bare space, the designer must confine himself to just so much ornament as the fabric appears to demand. ma fig. . then, for some purposes, an elaborate design is unsuitable, so that too much ornament will vulgarize and spoil a fabric rather than enhance its beauty. it is in such cases that the spot character of design, as shown in fig. , is most useful, especially when the ground of the material requires only sufficient ornament to break its monotony, or where the material is to be used in small quantities. . influence of fashions—the prevailing fashions influence this condition of design to a great extent, especially in regard to wearing apparel. sometimes the demand is for practical design. fig. . fig. § practical design. spots, sometimes for elaborately figured goods, and some- times there is an occasion for a medium between the two, as shown in fig. , which is a design based on an elaboration of the spot, but giving a spot and powdered effect. fig. shows a style of design that is used very largely in dress fabrics; its simple treatment renders it very suitable and to a large extent obviates the danger of faulty lining, and the design is very effective and easy to construct. it is arranged upon the diamond plan, as shown by the dotted lines in fig. , the largest spray being drawn first in any of the unit forms, and then turned over and dropped as before explained. it may, under some conditions, be suffi- cient to trace simply the four corners of the repeat and then trace in the principal sprig to fill the center of the lozenge shape and occupy any bare space that may appear. under these circumstances, it is wise to turn the tracing paper back and add the sprig to the larger one and then insert the small sprig in other repeats just as the large sprig was put in at the four corners. where it is desirous that there should be but little of the ground broken with ornament, a little running vine may be used as the basis of the design, arranged in sprays somewhat as shown in fig. . the construction here is very simple, and though the sprigs run in a lozenge shape, the pattern is constructed upon the system of the square, as shown in fig. . ' . irregular unlts.—a design in which the forms are connected is of much more importance to the designer than a simple sprig pattern such as shown in figs. and . practical design. § and is naturally much more intricate to execute. the struc- tural basis of the design shown in fig. is an irregular lozenge shape different from anything we have heretofore considered, as shown in fig. . the simplest way of constructing this design is by means of vertical and horizontal lines, the latter drawn at equal fig. . distances, as at a , fig. , and the vertical ones alternating with a large and small space as at dc, e f, etc. the two large flowers may then be placed in the upper corner of a rectangle of the repeat as at a and the other large flower at the intersection of the vertical and horizontal line, below this rectangle, as at . the connecting lines and secondary features may then be sketched in and drawn as shown. this § _ practical design. five clover leaves, and the main feature of the design consists of the arrangement of these flowers and leaves in order to give the impression of simplicity and at the same time pro- duce an all-over effect, without expressing in a pronounced degree the system of its arrangement. . in fig. we have a turn-over pattern on the (lia- mond basis and it conceals the simplicity of its development through the possession of three equally prominent features. the circular flowers, for instance, are arranged on the dia- mond plan, and the other two features are intersected in a regular order, while the stem oscillates from side to side, sending off alternately to the right and left a scroll with a bud or a blossom. the effect of this treatment, simple though it is, is exceedingly pleasing and expresses the variety that can be attained by the simple geometrical arrangements that underlie it. simplicity in the arrangement of a design should always be the aim of the designer, as a pleasing effect practical design. gr fig. . fig. . § practical design. ‘ ,-’.< \ ‘ . /.' eea$* - - vu- i f . \ [a , mi» . ,. # i‘ ‘(iililll o ‘~. l'§';~~ij' ) / $§$ v a = \ ii a . m l i: :- . ml ii- fig. . practical design. § the design on each side of a given center line, only one-half of the pattern need be executed for weaving purposes, as it can be adapted to a center tie. this example is particularly interesting in showing the contrast of line, and it will be observed by studying the elements of fig. , which is a skeleton outline of fig. , that when one line crosses another, in nearly every instance it crosses it at a right angle and thereby gives to the design a sharpness and crispness that characterizes it. . in fig. is shown a design based on the dia- mond and arranged as a center tie. its principal con- struction lines are a pair of ogee curves that cross each other, one of which follows the stem of the running vine, and the other forms the governing direction of an orna- mental ribbon work that underlies the main decoration. this introduces also a contrast between the ribbon and the design itself that causes the latter to stand up promi- nently and prevents the whole composition from appearing monotonous. practical design. § . size of the repeat in dnmasks.—first, we must consider the size of the article, and in most instances a size that is an even multiple of a quarter of a yard is found to be convenient. fabrics such as table covers and table linen, or carpets, will always be found to be multiples of a quarter- yard in both length and breadth. for instance, quarter- yards by quarter-yards gives us feet inches by feet fig. . inches; and take a table cover of these dimensions as shown in fig. and we have the setting out arrangement of the repeats in which a very highly ornate treatment is given. in this case, the size of the repeat is one-quarter of a yard in each direction. this has the advantage of making the design capable of fitting any size table cover, either in length or breadth, that is desired, simply by increasing the number of repeats. § practical design. the border around this, it will be observed, is the same in design and dimension of its repeats both at the sides and at the ends, and it may be readily observed that the secondary repeats of the filling fall directly in line with the repeats of the border not only on the sides and ends but also in the corner. this -inch square repeat is the simplest and least /. fig. . expensive way of dealing with a fabric such as a table cloth, and is suitable for some particular designs, but the designer is in no way limited to this shape. . unequal repeats.——in fig. is shown another design of identical dimensions with fig. , in which the filling repeat is oblong and the proportion of the oblong is such as to make it similar to the entire oblong surface of the § practical design. a troublesome one unless the design is similar to that shown in fig. , as it is a simple matter to design a corner to fit a system of repeat that is uniform in the two directions. but in running borders such as shown in figs. and , the ornament must have a distinct development in one direction and grow from itself continuously. in some forms of art this is not difficult at all, but in a woven fabric it must be borne in mind that the two side borders must be equal, the top and bottom borders must be equal, and the corners each the same. . in fig. we have a design of a border that is made to connect around the corners without any break, while in fig. we have at b c a design for a border that runs from the center of the width around the corner to the center of the length, where it is stopped by a rosette or other inde- \ r \ ’ g \ i i \ i \ z’f \ i \ \ \ \ \ \ \ | \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , \ _- \ ’ \ i / \ \ , \l fig. . pendent device. this system of treatment, however, requires that the repeat of the border and its adjacent filling shall amount to one-quarter of the whole fabric, as shown at ; c d .r, and that whatever comes in this quarter must reverse and repeat above and on the other side; this system also practical design. § permits us to treat the angles of the filling with separate ornament, as shown at (a) in fig. . when a fabric is square it is sometimes convenient to duplicate the design on each side of the diagonal line, as shown in fig. , where the square is divided into eight equal triangular pieces as shown at fg/z, each of which is symmetrical but reversed from its ' neighbor. . lace-curtain design. — where cur‘ tains are woven in one piece, one of the most popular schemes of de- sign is to have a dado treatment at the bottom“ and a border on each of the sides. this bor- der can be of the same width on each side or of varying widths, accord- in g to the circumstances, 'or the design may be q such that the two bor- ders and the dado con_ sist of one scheme of ornament varying in width to express the proportion of each. much economy can be effected, however, in the designing of curtains by having the whole length worked out upon a symmetrical arrange- ment so that the two halves each side of the center line will be identical. this may be somewhat severe in style, but is capable of producing the happiest of results. in fig. is shown a symmetrical arrangement of design § practical design. duplicating on the center line y/l. only one-half of this design would need to be prepared on design paper, g/z/el is?) m k:- i . "j \ . i\ \ ' : ' “ fig. . being the amount required for the dado, and klmn, the repeat for the border and filling of the body of the cur- tain; whereas in fig. . just twice this quantity of design g practical design. § would have to be executed, as the pattern extends the full width of the curtain. the severity of style which this plan is likely to produce may be somewhat obviated by the use of a free center, shown in fig. , where the design on each side of a given center line is exactly balanced and reproduced. the amount of design worked out on paper in this case is shown at a [it‘d in the dado, and cdt'f in the upper portion of the curtain, and when this is woven, the opposite side is separated from it a distance equal to g. and the free center - bg/zc in the dado, and £ ! kf for the repeat in ~ g the upper part of the cur- _ tain would require to be drawn out separately on design paper. . classification of borders. —we have so far devoted all our attention to the application of border designs to such textile .r fabrics as they are most i generally used, but we will now consider some of the more typical details upon which repeating borders may be constructed. for the purposes of classification, ordinary repeating borders are termed [in]: or vertebrate, according to the method by which the repeats are joined, the former being linked together by some conventional form that tends to give the appearance of combining the units, and the latter being built about a straight line that acts as a sort of backbone through the whole design. in fig. are shown several borders built up of historic ornament and illustrating the principles of this classification. ' b i! fig. . § practical design. it will be noticed that in nearly all of them there is a decided tendency to vertical and horizontal arrangement, that the ornament grows, or appears to grow, at right angles to one of the edges or from both of them. for instance, the greek border at (a) appears to be perpendicular to the inner edge, glwi‘g " f /'\_/ ll"ll§‘,llll"' "it _. fig. . while that at (b) is perpendicular to the outer edge, and at (c) is alternately perpendicular to the two edges, each separate element being connected by an s-shaped link. these designs are all greek in origin and express the handling of border elements typical of the greek style. . borders for hangings and table covers.—it should always be borne in mind that the position of the practical design. § goods or material on which the border is designed must always be considered before the characteristics of the border are decided upon. table covers and scarfs are usually seen in such a position that the border assumes a perpendicular position in relation to the outer edge, and for such a purpose the design shown at ( ) would be perfectly suitable. on por- tiers and other hangings, the lower border is perpendicular to the bottom line, while the side borders could be either perpendicular to the outer or the inner line, and a combina- tion of effect is obtained by using the pattern shown at (r), where the border runs all the way around, or the one shown at (d), where the border runs up and down the sides and a straight dado is designed across the bottom. . borders for rugs and floor coverings—rugs and carpet squares are usually observed from the center of the room, and a border design is most satisfactory when it is perpendicular to the inner edge of the border line, as shown at (a) and (e), the latter being a design based on arabian lines. at (a) the link is parallel with the direction of the border and turns up at each end to join the ornamental figures that constitute the principal elements of the design. at (a) the link consists of a number of semicircles, the ends of which unite every other ornamental detail. at (f) it assumes an s shape and lies in a horizontal position, while at (d) the link travels from one side of the border to the other, as it does - also at ( ), though in the former case each s runs in the same direction as its neighbor, and in the latter case they are made to reverse alternately. . vertebrate borders.—all of the above are link borders, while those shown in fig. are vertebrate borders. the chief characteristics that we observe in comparing these two figures is that the link border seems more associated with classic art, while the character of the vertebrate border tends more toward the middle ages and renaissance design. at (a) is shown the simplest pattern consisting of a straight line or backbone, with a series of leaves growing § practical design. § practical design. ' hanging, the corner is usually lost by the folding of the cloth. it should be borne in mind that the purpose of any angle &. l i \j {_—}}t]—" " ql : l“ ! fig. . ornament is to break the crudcness of a sharp corner, but its form and contour must be consistent so that it leaves a pleasing effect. in the filling at (a) in fig. is shown the practical design. § outline of a rug in which the border and corner design shown at (b) is used, and it will be readily seen that the style of corner ornament shown at (b) is suitable only to a rug of oblong shape, while the oriental design shown at (c) is better adapted to a rug with a square shape, though of course it could be used in an oblong without any sense of incongruity, whereas the form shown at ( ) could not be used in a square rug. at (: ) is shown a corner design that breaks into the bor- der and causes it to stop abruptly at each side. this design is symmetrical upon the miter line as shown in fig. and is capable of reproduction on four sides of a square as described in connection with that figure. one other style of corner design is shown at (r) where the border runs around the corner, and repeats itself utterly independent of the corner ornament, and the corner orna- ment is woven or printed within the border line entirely independent of the border itself. this corner ornament is not enclosed in any definite outline as were ( ) and (c), nor is it symmetrical on the center line as are (c) and (d). it therefore requires separate consideration in design and requires no calculations for repeat in unison with a repeat of the border. . stripes.—the use of stripes in woven goods, of course, applies almost entirely to the field where a border is considered, or to the goods themselves exclusive of any con- sideration of corner or border ornament, but the purpose for which the goods are to be used will govern the size, strength, and direction of the stripe entirely. stripes running verti- cally tend to increase the appearance of height, while stripes running horizontally tend to decrease the impression of height. it is for this reason that short persons are advised to wear dress goods with stripes running vertically, and in the decoration of rooms with very high ceilings, numerous hori- zontal lines are introduced to decrease the effect of height. in fig. at (a) is shown a combination of a stripe and powdered effect consisting of narrow straight stripes from fig. . practical design. § which conventionalized flowers branch at an angle of °, changing their direction at each alternate stripe. at (b) the stripe consists of alternate wave lines with conventional flowers growing in the broader spaces on and between them. at ( ) parallel wave lines are broken by systematic and con- ventional ornament that grows from its sides alternately in the same manner as described in the vertebrate border, fig. (: ). at ( ') the stripe crosses the ornament in a diagonal direc- tion at an angle of °, and consideration will remind the student that the direction of this stripe is governed by the diagonal of the rectangle representing the repeat. if the repeat were within an oblong, the angle of the stripe could be made greater or less than °, according to the propor- tions of the rectangle. at is shown a more complicated treatment of a striped design wherein three distinct styles of contrasting stripe are used—a conventionalized floral form alternating with a conventionalized geometrical form from which it is separated by a heavy wave-line stripe. . style in historic stripes.—in fig. we have. three examples-of stripe ornament showing the characteris- tics of historic styles. at (a) the straight stripe is relieved of its monotony by an all-over pattern of sprigs, four of the sprigs representing the four corners of a rectangular repeat with the fifth sprig in the center. this might be considered a combination of a stripe-and-spot pattern, the style of which is characteristic of the old italian brocades, this example having been taken from a piece of italian velvet. the treatment given at (b) is entirely different from this —a severely conventional design—being alternated with a somewhat naturalistic rendering, thereby giving the effect of a light stripe alternating with a dark one, a style of design characteristic of the early gothic period. the pattern shown at (c) is from an old spanish fabric showing alternate light and dark stripes, each of which heightens the interest of the other and both of which are more or less elaborated with conventional floral designs. $ practical design. fig. , applied design. (part .) geometrical considerations. . fitness—in applying any form of nature to a surface in order to produce a decoration, it must unquestionably possess a quality known as fitness for that purpose for which it is required. it is just as important that the decora- tion should exactly fit the utensil as that the utensil should exactly fit the purpose for which it is made. mere applica- tion of ornament to a space is not decoration, nor is it applied design. it must be adapted to that space as per- fectly as possible, and in any respect that it falls short of this perfect adaption, just in that respect does it fall short of being a proper decoration. .‘ influence of shape.—-in fig. are shown four shapes or forms, and it will require very little study to determine that no two of them could be rationally treated from a decorative standpoint in exactly the same way, and in decorating them the first question that arises is, in what direction should the lines run on the surface that is to be occupied by them. here let it be known that the lines forming the boundaries of the figure should influence the direction of the lines laying out the pattern. the leading lines should emphasize the lines of the boundaries, unless for some reason this cannot be done, when the minor lines should be made to do so. § for notice of the copyright, see page immediately following the title page. applied design. § this must all be done with perfect harmony and due care to prevent monotony. both of these principles can be observed by paying particular attention to the effects of contrast and variety. . influence of conven- ,_ tionallsm.—in determining the , ) directions that are to be taken by the leading lines of our design, it is of the greatest importance that the character the design is to assume should be considered, whether it is to be a purely con- ventional composition to be based on conventionalism of general ideas, or on the realization of some particular plant. in the first case, we may assume any ornamental lines we choose, so long as they are suitable to their surroundings; but if the design is to realize some particular plant form, the lines must be such that they depict the growth of the plant and at the same time are suitable to the space they occupy. this limits our field of selection in the latter case, and we must select our natural types with care, in order that both of its conditions—adaptability of lines and adherence to plant growth——will be carried out. we must not let stiff growing plants be designed in easy flowing lines, nor must we allow the soft trailing aspect of running vines to be stiffened into an unnatural appearance, for such would not be convention- alism, but quite the contrary. (ll) . emphasis of structural lines.—in fig. we have the decoration of a surface similar to that shown at (a) of fig. , the first lines put in place here are the vertical ones repeating and emphasizing the effect of the sides of the applied design. § in fig. we have a decoration of a spandrel between two arches, based on the outline form shown in fig. at (c); the arches between which this spandrel is introduced being important features of this construction, the curved lines fig. . forming its boundaries are given more emphasis, while the vertical line separating them is introduced to present contrast. then, again, in fig. , which is based on (d) of fig. , the spiral forms and semicircle within the top emphasize the outline of the figure, while both con- trast and variety are produced by the flowing lines from the center to the sides. . harmony of secondary , lines—it must be observed, too, that while some of the lines used in laying out the ornament are in accord with the boundary of the surface, the secondary lines must also be influenced in their direction by the main lines, as shown in fig. , where the small branching lines from the ver- ticals are influenced by the curves in the verticals them- selves. ’ fig. . applied design. § such that the masses between them will bear a pleasing rela- tion to one another. this can also be studied from natural leaf forms. take, for instance, the ivy leaf shown in fig. , and observe how even is the distribution of the space—that although the veins do not equally divide the surface, they separate it into varying quantities so nicely graduated and balanced that there is an evenness and uniformity of arrangement. this distribution of masses is materially affected when our design is finished up and we convert the lines of our original decoration into flowing leaf forms and general details, propor- tioning the surfaces to the surface on which they are applied. fig. . . the general outline form shown in fig. suggests the distribution of lines that we desire for the decoration of fig. . this oblong surface, and the propriety and character of this distribution is expressed much more clearly when our design § applied design. is finished upon these lines, as it is in fig. (: ). here we have endeavored to preserve an even and restful balance between the background and the surface figure, securing a distribution of masses that would be materially influenced by any change in the direction of the originally sketched lines in fig. our sketch in fig. , showing another principle in effect- ing the contrast of lines in order to secure a characteristic decoration in a rectangular panel, when elaborated to the completed form in fig. (b), illustrates clearly the value of properly conceiving this distribution oflguide lines in order that the finished design may be carried out without material alteration of the original idea. ‘ . the value of practice in this direction cannot be too highly estimated, as it is of particular importance in. connec- tion with surface designs, whether that surface be a wall, or a floor, or the side of a building, or'a portion of the details of some interior decoration, and in fig. is shown the spandrel fig. . of the arch, the outlines of which were sketched in fig. . in working up patterns for an all-over design, it is necessary that the unit of the repeat should be based on the same system of treatment as we have considered in these single forms; other- wise, we will not obtain the satisfactory results that we look for in paper hangings, carpets, dress fabrics, etc. applied design. § . geometrical basis of surface decorations.— wall-paper patterns are laid out on a geometrical basis, and the adoption of different geometrical forms will lead to a great variety of designs in the filling in. in fig. at (a) is a pattern suited for wall decoration or textile design, where the leading lines are vertical and horizontal, and the repeated iii a {q , : f. s l -, k / ; ' : ‘ _ * ? ‘ re ., ornament consists in the joining of a number of decorated rectangles. at ( ) is shown a surface decoration where the foundations of the geometrical construction are tangent cir_ cles, yet the pattern is so handled that the lines governing its foundation principle are lost in the appearance of the entire design, and a study of the circular design itself would § applied design. show that the leading construction lines were set out in pre- cisely the same manner as in figs. to . at (c) the basis for construction of ornament is the lozenge shape, and this introduces oblique lines giving the pattern an entirely different character from the previous one, while at (d) the structural lines of the pattern being of a wavy or ogival character, give rise to the production of still another variety of surface ornament. in all of these designs the principal lines are in harmony with the form of the principal figure, and the filling in of the' figure is of a secondary consideration, although, of course, it lies with the designer to limit the character of his decoration simply to one figure or to run it into several figures, making the design simple or complex as he desires. l . retaining and abolishing fundamental geo- metric constructions.—then, again, the designer may retain the original form on which the design is based and emphasize it, or arrange that it will be abolished altogether when the pattern is completed, adopting his course according to the purpose to which the design is to be applied. as a suggestion, it may be said that if the design is for a wall paper to be used on a dado, the constructive geometrical forms are better retained, as they impart to the design a stiffness and strong look that make it suitable for the pur- pose; but if the paper is designed to be .hung between the dado and the frieze, the structural forms may be judiciously dispensed with and the flowing, easy pattern of the ornament left open that it may be more in harmony with the position it is to occupy. arrangement of details. . a method of evolving patterns upon the basis of intersecting lines has already been shown; the ornament formed on this principle has been analyzed as the basis for new ornament. starting from here, we will consider the method of treating a surface according to the composition and location of the ornament. ». st \- . .. . . . .t. . . .\.. .k . . ... .n . . r .. s. . . .. i n s. , a...” é . i]. h. v. . .u. i. i . : . z. §s 'applied design." g -' . general arrangements of ornament in surface work—there are five general arrangements of ornament in surface work—dz'nprring, c/u'ckcring, striping and ban/ling, paneling, and spotfz'ng and patt'drrz'rzg. assuming that we have simply a number of. square meshes laid'out as was our foundation plan in fig. of elemmts of ornament, we can, by simply filling in each square with'some form of ornament and repeating the arrangement regularly, obtain the style of treatment, known as diapering, shown in fig. , where at (a) and (b) the square forms are in a horizontal position, and at (c), (d), and (/ ), they are at an angle, or in other words, a lozenge shape. at ( ') and are shown the same design as is used at (a) and (( ), only the method of laying out the design is to have the ornament occupy only every other square, thereby producing the treatment known as checker- ing. at (g) we have a combination of these two forms, called cheekering and diapering, wherein the design is made lighter on every alternate square, thus giving a checker effect, while each square is filled with ornament as in the diaper effect. . in arranging our ornament in annexed squares, either vertical or horizontal, and leaving spaces of‘one or more rows of squares between, we get the efiect known as striping and banding, as shown at (z'), (j), and (k); or by combi- ning striping and banding in such a manner that the stripes and bands enclose a certain amount of space, we get the treatment called paneling, shown at (i), (m), and (n). an extreme treatment of this gives us the effect shown at ( ), sometimes called lining, where the space is divided by lines of different weights converting the surface into a number of small panels like a plaid. by extending the space between the ornaments to a greater or lesser extent, we obtain the effect known as spotting and powdering, as shown at (/ ), (q). and (r). ' r - ' . the difference between spotting and powdering simply consists in the relative area occupied by the different pieces of ornament. where the ornamentation and the background § applied design. are about of one area, or apparently so, the design is said to be powdered, but where the ornament exists in small masses with considerable space between, the effect is said to be spotted. . d aper.—we will now consider by itself each of these systems of arrangement: first comes the diaper—this consists of a pattern that regularly repeats itself so as to com- pletely cover a surface without interval, or in such a way that any interval that exists will form a part of the pattern. it is what is usually termed an all-over pattern—an arrange- ment of a most systematic character wherein each detail of the pattern is confined to an allotted space and does not overrun its boundaries. the forms on which the diaper is based may be of any shape, and frequently different forms may be used in the same diaper design alternating with each other both ver- tically and horizontally. this is shown in fig. where, at (a) and (h), the geometrical forms governing the diaper are squares and lozenge shapes, and at (t), tan- gent circles. . as the diaper developed historically, the pattern in each geometrical section was permitted to extend over and run into the succeeding section, thereby tending in a slight degree to obliterate the apparent geometric formation as shown at (d) and (e); and, finally, as it developed still more, the boundaries became ornamented as well as the spaces enclosed by them, and the diaper took a form shown at (f). it was then but a short step to the time when the formal all-over pattern developed itself, and arrived at what we consider the ordinary diaper pattern of the present day, which consists of a surface decoration that rarely shows its geometrical construction no matter how regular that con- struction may be. in fig. are shown four designs, at (a), (b), (c), and (( ’), wherein, after the geometrical guide lines have been removed, it is a difficult matter to trace the character of l - applied design. § the ornament each geometrical form shown dotted in these designs contains the complete details of all the orna- l if ‘ . o i , h;ng at“? @s > . / (d) §x\ fig. . ment of the entire surface and they repeat in each direction unlimitedly. - . fig. shows additional patterns taken from pieces of tapestry of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, whercon the geometrical expression of the design has been empha- _ sized for the purpose of illustration. at (a) the square is the basis on which the design is constructed and contains every detail of the entire pattern, but in two forms, one of @flhvflk .wafiwfiqu .stirfiswfl .vflv .wfi$ .\ < . d {h an. a. .e ans. /. j i w new . / . “v. (f) . flo. . ) ii" i \ \wi lar assays ' ., s .\“\ a”? truly.» | \jnljfi' ni %.. a: %: g w?! \ a a?! ( e . thanks... wavy/(“ate pm. vi av \ o f (a) ') § applied design. which is the reverse of the other, forming what might be considered a right-and-left pattern, so to speak. at ( ), however, the rectangle containing all the details of the design is repeated without reverse both above and below and on each side of itself. at (a), where the design is based on the lozenge shape, the pattern consists of a simple repe- tition of the lozenge form in diagonal directions on each of the four sides of its origin, while at (d) the general design is based on the circle, and the parts filled in, as well as the parts between the circles, are emphasized in the design and almost obliterate the geometrical basis of the construction. from this it can be seen that the extent to which a system of diapering can be varied is unlimited, and checkering is so similar to it that we can readily see it also has no limitation. . checkering.—in fig. , at (a) and (b), are shown two systems of surface decoration by means of checker work; at (a) the individual lines separating the checkers are omitted from the design and the checker filling alone is used, but at (b) the vertical lines of at least a part of the checker work are maintained in the design, and the fillings branch from either side of them in conventionalized floral forms. ' . striping, paneling, banding, spotting and powdering.—the effect obtained by striping is shown in fig. at (c), where the broad stripe down the center of the panel is blended into the border to improve the effect, while the space each side is broken by a single spot. at (d) the stripes run diagonally across the panel and divide its surface up into a number of bands. at (a) is shown the appearance of a panel decorated by spotting alone. here a large cen- tral spot forms a main feature and two smaller spots are placed above and below, the whole being balanced by means of vertical and horizontal lines. at (f) is shown the effect in panel work of spotting and powdering, the whole being arranged on a lozenge system of checker work, but destroyed from a checker work effect by the powdered background. applied design. § application of ()rnmient. n ang ] ng fabrics. . propriety of design.—in applying ornament to any surface the greatest consideration must be given to the question of purpose. the style and method of deco- rating a textile fabric may be very appropriate for itself and altogether inappropriate when applied to a wall sur- fig. . face. for instance, even in the same class of goods, a woven fabric that is to be used on a wall surface must necessarily present a different problem in design from one that is to form a hanging over a doorway—one is § applied design. stiff, flat, and hard, from the surface it is called upon to cover; the other is soft, movable, and flexible, and uneven in surface when in use; and a design that is suit- able for the one would surely be greatly out of place for the other. . here it must again be suggested that the method in the style of design that will best accent the qualities desired in each material will be the method most suitable in con- structing the design. the wall must appear flat, and for that reason a design that will not show any particular direc- tion will be more suitable. vertical and horizontal stripes must not form any part in the decoration, and a scheme based on diapering or pow- dering, or an all-over system of paneling, will be allow- able. . on the other hand, a curtain that is hung from a pole is suitable to striping, and horizontal or oblique stripes work in very naturally for such a purpose, as shown in fig. , as through the folds the stripes are broken "n, \, ,/ ‘ l‘ and the strongest effect of i i ._~, , » the movability and softness w of the goods is brought out. vertically striped patterns are to be avoided as hangings, as their design tends to confusion, emphasizing the folds of the goods instead of harmonizing them, as shown in fig. . another point that should be considered in designing hangings is the size of the pattern compared with the weight and quality of the goods—a heavy material that will lie in fig. . applied design. § bold round folds can support a pattern of large details and vigorous design, but light goods that hang in delicate undu- lations require a delicate handling in order that the pattern may not appear incongruous or heavy for the goods. wall decoration. . methods of treatment.—in the wall decoration of large and important rooms, the figures forming the detail of the decoration may be bold and heavy, but in small rooms of less importance in character the figures of the decoration should be sufficiently reduced not to attract the eye from the other harmonies of the room. aside from the scale of the detail of the pattern, there should be considered the order of its distribution, for when we begin to divide a surface into its different sections we must consider the value of each section and the relative importance each is to occupy in the design. for instance, should we divide our wall into dado, wall surface, and frieze, and possibly subdivide these members by moldings and borders, we are emphasizing an idea derived from a struc- tural value——the pedestal, column, and entablature of an architectural order—and the parts having the greatest struc- tural value should, therefore, receive the most severe treat- ment, while those of less importance may have a delicate and more picturesque treatment. the dado, being the support of the wall surface, must therefore receive the plainest and most dignified decoration, while the wall sur- face itself may be freely treated with a diaper or spotted decoration, and the frieze, with an elaborate though delicate treatment. . pilnster forms of treatment.—s metimes the wall may be divided by means of pilasters so that it consists of a number of panels; then it loses its character as an entire wall surface, and the panels should be decorated individu~ ally, while the pilasters as structural members should receive proper treatment of importance and dignity. applied design. § avoidance of too small a scale, as can be seen in fig. . the largest possible scale that can be worked on this prin- ciple, next to the full size shown at (a), is shown at (b), and the arrangement shown at (d), though satisfactory for a repetition horizontally by /a\ / dropping the pattern one- / third of a block, will not repeat vertically and so am- \ / \ \ /<\ not be prz'n/rd. (a) . proportion of the unlt.-—-here is the first , \ / problem that confronts us in i \ making a repeat pattern. k [ “ , "\ we have in fig. six \ ,i' \ ,i' \ schemes of arrangement by x which to adapt the form \ \ shown at (a) to a different \ i \ scale of pattern, each of which is likely to present ( ) ‘ certain unsurmountable dis- advantages. the scheme at (b) may be too narrow for the height according to the work of the design; ( ) is still more so; ( /) presents us with a smaller pattern than (a) in the same proportion, but one that cannot be printed owing to its lack of vertical repeat; ( ) being but half the size of (a) may be too small; and (f), though suitable in every respect for a drop pattern, demands that the proportions of the printing block be changed, which is not a convenient thing to do. we therefore must resort to the printing of our pattern in large scales as at (a), or reduce its proportions to the forms shown at (b) and (c). fig. . . bringing this down to a practical basis, we have in fig. at (a) the diagram of a wall-paper pattern on a basis of geomertrical figures and at (b) the method of dropping it in order to secure the satisfactory repeats. this, however, ppppppppppp n. é garages (at set a fig. . § applied design. the fourth method, shown at (d), is by the introduction of a number of panels, but this is only applicable where a severe form of treatment is desired. the system of filling a frieze with a few vertical ornaments is entirely in accord with the structural conditions and recalls the vertical mem- bers in the triglyphs of the doric order, and the dentals in the ionic and corinthian. it makes no difference whether we lay out our frieze by an arrangement of panels or by simple vertical elements, we must bear in mind that it is always wise to accentuate the structural lines, but the extent to which this is permissible depends on the general scheme adopted. if the scheme of design is severe and dignified, structural accentuation may be carried out to a greater degree than if the treatment be light and fanciful. . borders—borders are used sometimes in wall deco- ration to separate the frieze and the dado from the filling or wall space, or are sometimes used as the boundaries of panels. their primary office in design is usually to prevent the decoration of one surface from lapping over and imping- ing on that of another; therefore, an elaborate border of complicated design requires a separating element of a plainer character in order to keep its design from mixing with the design of the filling and thereby forming a part of the patterns it is intended to separate. this is sometimes accomplished by making a distinct contrast between the character of the pattern of the border and that of the filling. this may be done in matter of color, or in the arrangement of lines, allowing vertical lines to predomi- nate one, and horizontal lines to form the characteristics of the other. . another use to which the border is put is that of the enclosing of an ornament in order to confine it and give it an expression of unity as illustrated in fig. of filaments of ornamrnt. in the case of pictures, the application of a border in the form of a frame -is to separate it from the more applied design. § conventional rendering of the wall surface on which it hangs and confine the attention to that which is enclosed. . the treatment of the border depends entirely on the space around it, and the character of the design must be carefully studied in order that the border may not be of more interest than the picture. occasionally, when the subject does not allow the enclosure a proper border, a simple line around the edge to confine it to its apparently allotted space is sometimes sufficient to satisfy the eye, but this method should be but sparingly used and only when some good reason warrants its adoption. the character of the border, as said before, must be studied relatively to the design surrounded; for instance, in fig. is shown a panel of conventional design where at (a) (a) fig. . the simple line border is readily seen to be insufficient, while at (b) a heavier border is introduced and suits its pur- pose better. there is no rule that requires the design of a applied design. § border to be simply a band around its subject demanding parallel lines, and in fig. is shown a design where the inside of the border is not parallel with the outside, but con- sists of a surrounding member of special design to suit its particular purpose. in fig. we have at (a) a panel of foliated ornament surrounded by a border composed of details, the interest of which is too great and consequently conflicts with the inter- est in the panel itself; but at (b) the same foliated ornament is reduced in the border to a conventional rendering, thereby suiting its purpose exactly and enhancing the value of the design instead of detracting from it.‘ . corners—besides the consideration of borders, attention should be given to the consideration of corners where borders turn around a frame or wall surface, and it should always be remembered that a frame is structurally formed in one of several ways, the three most prominent of which are shown in fig. , where at (a) we have the (a) (b) ( ) fig. . miter joint, at (( ) a square joint, and at (r) the joggled or halved joint. the joint is always apparently the weakest part of a’structure, therefore the ornament should be added in such a way as to apparently strengthen this part of it, and in laying out a design it is advisable to start at the corner and apply the ornament in such a manner that it will appear to hold the corner in position and extend itself over the vertical and horizontal pieces. . pilasters—besides horizontal borders, there are vertical elements that fulfil the same functions, and under applied design. § cord or ribbon as shown at (b), and this treatment should be used only when the pilaster itself is of vigorous design and requires no element to apparently strengthen its ability to support. a third method is arranged upon a succession of spirals growing apparently in vine form from the bottom of the pilaster or panel and neither adding to nor detracting from its value as a structural member, as shown at (c). the fourth method, shown at (d), is similar in effect to the first, and is based on a series of wave lines crossing and recrossing a central stem without in any way adding to its apparent support. . in the treatment of these, designs (a) and ( ), being additions to the development of structural feeling, will require a conventional rendering of their details. the cen- tral axis must be strong, and architectural elements can be used in the subdivisions. ,on the other hand, the light delicate treatment of (ii) and (c) will permit of a naturalistic rendering, and grape-vine, ivy, or morning-glory patterns, never suit- able to the other surroundings, may form the type on which the design is based. ceiling decoration. . in every room there are two surfaces that require consideration in connection with the architecture and deco- rative treatment; these are the ceiling and the floor. the first of these is usually the least decorated part of any apartment, though in many historic buildings the conditions are quite the reverse. . in decorating the ceiling it should always be remem- bered that this detail of a room acts as a reflector of light and should therefore be treated in such a manner that its ornamentation will not render the apartment gloomy, and particularly if the ceiling is low. it should certainly be in harmony, both in design and color, with other details of the room and particularly with the frieze or cornice with which it is surrounded. its design may consist of the most simple treatment, limited to a border, with ornaments at the § applied design. corners to strengthen them; or it may consist of a number of structural lines covering the whole surface, particularly if a structural treatment is given the frieze. this may be understood somewhat by referring to fig. , which shows a ffjafjfq© is: . ‘ r “: : '\ fix/l}, . : " structural arrangement of a ceiling resulting in panels of irregular sizes and shapes, each of which forms a subject for individual decoration according to its value in relation to the others. this was the usual treatment accorded the french buildings in the beginning of the nineteenth century. as applied design. s in fig. is shown a corner of a ceiling in the style that prevailed largely during the elizabethan period —a development of the elaborate tracery of gothic days, relieved with spotted ornaments; while fig. shows a design for all-over treatment suitable for a wall-paper pattern that can be mounted on the ceiling as other patterns are on the side walls. applied design. § . adaptability of deeoration.--care must be taken to suit the general decoration t the purposes of the room and the character of its surroundings in each case, and where a room is small and the intention is to have it cosy and comfortable, a mild, delicate treatment of ceiling will be found the most satisfactory; but, in large halls and assembly rooms, a ceiling can be elaborated with more interesting subjects, as there will be a number of points from'which it can be studied. this was the method of treating the pompeian ceilings, as shown in fig. . . it should also be mentioned that all ceilings are not flat—some are arched, some are domed, and some have pre- served the natural conditions by the insertion of paneling between the beams. the decorative treatment of each of these must be considered according to its case. flat ornament must not be applied to curved surfaces, as it is likely to appear distorted, and the decorative details that are suited for long narrow panels, in the depths of vwhich illumination will be poor, are certainly not suited to broad, open wall space. with domed and arched ceilings, the character of the ornament should tend to vertical ele- ments where the ceiling joins the side walls, and gradually shape itself to horizontal elements as it rounds overhead, each of these blending into the other to preserve unity in the design. floor decoration. . necessity of flatnes<.—in covering the floors of an apartment, no matter what the material is to be, it should always be borne in mind that the prime element to be con- sidered is that of the flatness of surface. it is proper that a ceiling should be paneled, domed, or vaulted; that a side wall should consist of pilasters and framed pictures, of pro- jecting and overhanging entablatures, or be supported upon a continuous dado; but under all conditions the floor is flat and any decoration that tends to interfere with this flatness is out of place, and wrong. § applied design. given to the flexibility of its character. carpet usually pos- sesses a soft and somewhat yielding surface and it is there- fore proper that patterns woven in it should be made up largely of curved lines that are more expressive of softness and flexibility than are straight lines—symbolic of firmness and strength. great contrast in a carpet design is undesirable, because it is expressive of hardness and firmness, at variance with the character of the material. for instance, in fig. at (a) the appearance of the design is uneven and there is too great a contrast between the tones of color used. the treatment at (b) is better and gives a flatter appearance, but the outlining of the pattern has increased the contrast of the general ground. at ( ), however, the tones are brought nearer together and the entire appearance is flat and soft, so that the pattern and the ground melt and blend into each other . in a harmonious manner entirely suitable to the material and its purpose. utensils and vases. . rigin.—all objects that are products of industrial art have evolved by successive developments from some simple form that was originally constructed to serve a utili- tarian purpose only. the most elaborate forms of cups, vases, furniture, jewelry, etc. each have a most elementary origin, and various alterations, for reasons of convenience, have been forced upon them, in accordance with the con- stantly altering conditions of society. take, for instance, a cup; this vessel has its origin in the desire of prehistoric man to provide himself with some vessel of capacity in which to collect water to drink and for other purposes. the earliest cups and bowls were doubtless natural ones, consisting probably of gourds, shells, horns of animals, etc., and these crude implements satisfied man's requirements until a more cultivated period of society was attained, and we find man manufacturing utensils of clay. nothing was more natural than that he should imitate in clay the same forms and shapes to which he had been applied design. § body, the portion between the body and the stem was called the calyx, and then came the stem and the foot. the next development was on the principle of extension of individual parts: first, the development of the calyx, so that it was emphasized beyond the body of the cup, as shown at (f) and (g); then the decoration of the frieze below the lip became a feature, and, subsequently, for the purpose of keeping out dust, etc., a cover'was added, as shown at (/ ). . the term hanap is usually applied to those vessels with covers to distinguish them from the open ones, and when such vessels were made of large size—so large, in fact, that they could not be handled without great incon- venience—it became necessary to elongate the stem in order that it might be grasped entirely around by the hand, or else to add on one or two sides of the cup a handle. to distinguish these two, it was necessary to call the large glass with a stem a lama/ , while the one that was lifted by means of a side handle was termed a laukard. i the introduction of the long stem brought as a necessity of construction another detail, the knoll), which is a ball or protuberance in the middle of the stem to keep it from slip- ping through the hand, as shown at (j) of fig. , and the stem was extended so that it was necessary to add a finial or knob on the center of the cover, in order to preserve the line of balance and apparent stability of a cup. . as luxury became more general, drinking vessels became elaborately ornate and engraved and were regarded more as articles indicative of wealth than for actual use. the enrichment of the surface of the hanaps was usually produced by three general methods, all of which are depend- ent, for their effect, on the contour they bring about. the first method is to add variety to the outline, the second method to develop individual parts, and the third method to subdivide the surface. - the alteration in outline arose largely through the influ- ence of the nature of the material used and the method of applied design. § that of other drinking cups in order to minimize the danger of upsetting. the base was afterwards made irregular in shape, so that when the chalice was laid on the side to drain, as it frequently was, it would not tend to roll in one direction or the other, and incidental with these changes, the profile of the cup became somewhat altered, until it assumed generally the form shown in fig. . . the jug and vaer.— the jug and ewer seem to have been evolved by an entirely dif- ferent process from that which called into existence the vessels we have already considered, as these vessels have a long side handle for lifting them, instead of a stem. ewers were prob- ably dcrived from vases and beakers, by repressing the stem on one side and cutting the lip obliquely downwards so as to make it more serviceable, at the opposite side. . i-iandles.—in designing vessels with handles it is important to give proper consideration for the position of the handle with relation to the lips and spouts of the vessel, in order that its contents may not act against the pouring action. the point whereat a vessel can best be grasped and turned to pour out its contents will be a little above the center of gravity of the whole mass, and it is of the highest importance to determine the point of the center of gravity in order that the handle will be properly placed upon a pitcher. this may be very easily done, graphically, by cut- ting out, in cardboard, the form of a vertical section through the center of the proposed vessel and drawing on this § applied design. though floating on the waves of the sea give an irregular outline to the top. the propriety of this distribution of hair is evident from two points; first, it produces the hori- zontal lines necessary to emphasize and apparently strengthen the weakest part of the vessel, and, second, applies a type of decoration consistent with the profile on which the out- line is formed. the handles consist of dolphins reduced to conventionalized forms according to the principles suggested in the discussion of the animal elements of design in ela- ments of ornament. it is not necessary in a design of this character that the entire profile should be used, or that it should be maintained in this position or particular angle. it maybe varied to suit any conditions according to the artist’s fancy, and is used here only to illustrate that an interesting outline may be applied to various widely differing objects, always caus- ing a pleasing effect inasmuch as it is the proportions and variations of the curves of these outlines that satisfy the artistic eye. when such an outline is adopted, whether it is the profile of the human face, the curve of the neck, shoulder, or any other portion of the body, or an established outline of any other natural form, care should always be exercised that the surface decoration accompanying it is in harmony with the disposition of its various parts, and that members requir- ing a treatment in horizontal lines are not handled in accord- ance with the system of decoration that creates a wrong impression. each thing should be suited to its place; no element should be applied unless it appears to be required, and no ornament should be placed so that it will destroy the effect of what is essentially an interesting outline or a well proportioned surface. ' applied design. (part .) textile fabrics. general considerations. . appropriateness of design. in making a design for any class of textile fabric, the first object to be con- sidered is, the use to which this fabric is to be applied. this having been determined, the ornament of the fabric can be considered either as part of the structure woven into the fabric itself, or stamped on its surface, as in cotton goods or in some silks. it thus appears that in the design of textile fabrics we do not necessarily work entirely on principles of art; but designate to the weaver, by means of drawings, details that are to confine him to a certain structure of goods. . purposes of fabrics—the use to which a fabric is to be put very materially determines its structure, and we may divide these uses, purely from a utilitarian standpoint, into two classes—coverings for the body to keep it warm, and coverings for our walls and furniture, primarily, perhaps, as a decoration, but, in reality, also to provide warmth. in both cases, the goods will be called upon to fulfil one condi- tion; that is, wear, and in this subject of wear we are con- cerned entirely with the structure of the goods, its ornament § for notice of the copyright, see page immediately following the title page. applied design. § affecting the wear only inasmuch as that ornament affects the structure. some goods must bear strain in one direction to fulfil this condition of wear, others must be able to stand friction and general handling without apparent damage, and others are likely to be called upon for both these qualities. . textile fabrics may be generally described as a com- bination of interwoven or interlaced threads, and the struc- ture of that fabric consists of the method of interlacing these threads in order that the fabric may serve all the require- ments of its purpose. now, the threads that go to make up any woven fabric are divided into two sets—the warp l/zrmds that run lengthwise of the goods on the loom and are practically continuous throughout the entire piece, and the weft l/zrmds that run crosswise of the goods and inter- weave with the warp. “ . \veavlng.—-this interweaving is effected in the loom by lifting a certain number of warp threads and passing the weft thread under them, after which another set of warp threads is lifted and another line of weft thread is passed ~ under. if, in this system of weaving, " we lift every other warp thread and pass the weft through, and then lift every alternate warp thread between and pass the weft thread back, we will - produce a weave of plain goods, such as is shown in the diagram, fig. , where the warp threads with the odd numbers , , , etc. are lifted and the weft thread is passed through from a to i). then the even numbered warp threads , ,, , etc. are lifted and the weft thread is returned from b to c, and so on, alternately, weaving a piece of plain cloth the width of which remains constantly equal to a b, but the length can be unlimited and is determined entirely by the length of the warp threads that are wound on a cylinder in the loom, called the beam. a: v : }. ' 'h fig. . § applied design. the structural design of any woven fabric depends entirely on the arrangement of these warp and weft threads, while its wearing qualities and utility may be dependent on the character of the threads themselves, both as to the material of which they are made and the mannerin which they are spun. . effect of twist in veaving.—it will be seen from fig. that the twist of the thread, or yarn, in the warp threads is at right angles to the twist of the threads in the weft and that it will be necessary, therefore, that these threads should bend around one another and, thereby, leave small open spaces, instead of lying quite tight and close together. the thicker the threads of which the fabric is made, the larger will be these open spaces; and the thinner the thread, the smaller and closer will be the weave. other conditions of the yarn will affect these perforations also, as a thread that is soft and fuzzy will pack in rather closely and will practically fill up the open spaces by the projecting filaments of fuzz and make a piece of solid goods,_so that in the mechanical process of weaving we can press the goods closely together and as the yarn springs out it will fill up these small openings and produce a solid piece of goods. on the other hand, if the yarn is twisted hard, so as to make a firm, solid thread, it cannot be compressed as can the softer yarn, and it will, therefore, be worked less closely together, producing an open fabric, but, owing to the hard- ness of the thread, a fabric that will bear more wear from friction than the previous one. . now, in fig. we have an illustration of a fabric precisely the same as that in fig. , except that the weft thread is twisted in its manufacture in the opposite direc- tion to that of the thread used in the warp, and it will be observed that the lines of this twist are parallel in weft and warp and that when the threads are woven together the fit}. . § applied design. be drawn through the fingers from its root to its end, it will slip quite smoothly, but if drawn in the contrary direction, it will feel rough and present considerable resistance. it is the scales on its surface and the crinkliness in its length that gives to wool fiber its particular value, and when this fiber is spun into thread it is arranged so that these scales on its surface are opposed to one another as much as possible and thereby interlock and hold fast to one another, and the more the thread is spun the closer do they engage one another and the stronger does the filament become. . felting.—-it is not only in the spinning that these scales are of value, but after the goods are woven they can be put through a process called felting, in which the fibers are pounded together and the scales made to interlock so firmly that the fabric becomes perfectly compact and homo- geneous so that it is with the greatest difliculty that the individual warp and weft threads may be discerned and unraveled. the waves, or crimps, in the fiber are "of value in this operation, as well as the scales. the felting is effected by wetting the cloth with soapy water and apply- ing pressure. the result of this process is, that these fibers are straightened out and the scales of the opposing fibers engage, or lock in, with them, and when the pres- sure is removed the natural spring or crinkliness of the fiber causes it to return as nearly as possible to its origi- nal position and draws all of the other fibers with it, caus- ing compactness in the goods. this operation is repeated several times so that the threads lose their individuality and the cloth becomes a solid compact mass. where felt- ing is carried out to its greatest extent, the threads must be especially prepared; and any pattern that is intended to appear in the weaving, through this process is seri- ously impaired or may be entirely lost. different classes of wools vary materially in this quality of waviness, and, therefore, some are better suited than others to this class of work. applied design. § . cotton fibers—under the microscope, a wad of cotton appears materially different from a lock of wool. cotton is a vegetable fiber and, when magnified, appears as a thin flat tube or ribbon considerably twisted, and these twists in the fiber are what give the strength to the cotton thread by interlocking with one another somewhat after the manner of the scales on the woolen thread. the cotton fiber, however, is soft and pliable and does not possess that natural crinkly spring that we find in the wool; hence, threads that we are able to spin from it are weak and do not possess the ability to be felted as do the woolen threads. . silk f bers.-—silk is obtained from unwinding the filament from the cocoon of the silk worm and in reality is not materially different from ordinary spider's web. under the microscope, it appears as a very straight, smooth, and highly polished fiber, somewhat like a glass rod. it is soft, exceedingly pliable, and lends itself readily to the forma- tion of a thread, but it cannot be spun like wool and cotton, as it has no peculiarities of surface that correspond to the scales of the former or the twists in the latter, and silk filaments can be made into thread only by twisting, a num- ber of filaments being twisted together into fine threads and then a number of these fine threads again twisted until a final thread of proper weight is obtained. . flax fibers—flax is a vegetable fiber appearing like long blades of grass. it is cylindrical in form, and has knots at regular intervals throughout its length. these knots act, mechanically, in the spinning of the thread in a similar manner to the scales in the wool and the twists in the cotton fiber. . of each of these four classes of fibers we can make two entirely different kinds of thread, and it is in the manu- facture of this thread that we materially affect the orna- mentation and sometimes the structural formation of the fabric. applied design. § it is passed through two or three of these carding machines in order to reduce it to a finer quality. . woolen yarn.—the essential distinction between woolen and worsted yarns consists of a difference in the quality of the wool and of a difference in the methods of spinning into thread. generally, it may be said that woolen yarns are made from shorter fibers than worsted yarns and of fibers that possess the highest felting qualities, or in other words. that are most sharply crinkled, and that the yarns are prepared from the carded fibers more or less crossed and interlocked with one another with no attempt at parallelism. though these may be spun hard upon the mule frame, they form a light fluffy yarn that is suitable, when woven into cloth, to produce a partially felted goods, which, in reality, is the distinguishing characteristic between woolen and worsted goods. . worsted yarn.—\vorsted yarns are generally made of the long silky varieties of wool, and the fibers are combed as well as carded, in order to bring them as nearly parallel to one another as possible. the spinning of worsted yarn is accomplished on a throstlc frame and the thread is smooth and compact and does not partake of the character of felting in any part of its weaving. in all varieties of worsted and woolen yarns there is a tendency for each to partake largely of the characteristics of the other, some oolens being made from longer wool than are some worsteds, and worsteds being made from short staple wool, so that the actual length of the fiber has nothing to do with the classification, but its felting quality and method of conversion into thread forms the distinction. . preparing “fool for splnning.-—vvhen the carded wool has passed through the third carding machine, it is in the form of a continuous evenly distributed mat around the last cylinder. to prepare it for spinning, it must be divided into a series of equal strips or ribbons, and these condensed into a round sliver sufficiently compact to stand winding on § applied design. a bobbin. the condenser for doing this is attached to the carding machine, and as the strips pass off the drum they are acted on bya pair of rubbers that simply pinch the sliver down to a smaller size by compacting the fibers with- out twisting them. from this they pass to the spinning mule and are drawn down to fine threads. . the mule—the mule frame on which this spinning is effected acts in_ a similar manner, but on a larger scale, to the old-fashioned spinning wheel. large bobbins or spools of the wool sliver are placed on the frame and their ends drawn and attached to vertical spindles that revolve and give a twist to the yarn as it draws it. the frame contain- ing the spindles advances to the sliver spools and then backs away from them, as the sliver is gradually fed out as the spools revolve. the entire distance moved by the frame is or feet, during two-thirds of which the sliver is fed out as the frame recedes, but during the rest of the distance the spools remain stationary and the sliver is drawn or stretched, thereby becoming thinner, and at the same time it is rapidly twisted by the revolving spindles into an even compact thread. when this twist is completed, the mule frame advances toward the sliver spools again, and the spun threads just completed are wound upon the spindles as the mule frame advances. . the effect of this drawing and twisting at one time is one of the characteristics of woolen thread. it is evident that, in drawing, the stretch will not take place evenly and that some portions of the yarn will be thinner than the others; but it is also evident that these thinner portions will be the ones that will be first affected by the twisting, or spin- ning, of the bobbins and when once twisted become hard and less subject to drawing, thereby causing the thicker por- tions between them to be drawn out more. \vhile the tend- ency of this work is to equalize the thread, somewhat, it is not sufficient to compensate entirely, and, therefore, woolen thread is unequal and irregular in its thickness. § applied design. according to the quality and uniformity that is demanded in the goods. . throstle spinning.—after the yarn is drawn and redrawn, the bobbins containing it are placed on a throstle frame for spinning. in this process, the drawing is effected in exactly the same manner as in the woolen yarn on the spinning mule. the rovings, as the drawn yarns are called, pass between pairs of rollers in which they are drawn out by the difference of speed of rotation between the front pair and the back pair, and as the cylinder cord is delivered from the front pair of rollers, a spindle that is revolving rapidly gives it the required twist. these yarns or threads are known as singles. for some uses they are twisted into two-ply or three-ply yarns on a twisting frame where each single is drawn from a bobbin and twisted with others into a two-ply or three-ply yarn, as the case may be. . characteristics of worsted thread.—in worsted thread we have a yarn of great uniformity and evenness of diameter, all the fibers being parallel and as nearly as pos- sible of the same length. it therefore possesses the advan- tage of uniformity in strength and is especially suited to the weaving of fabrics where a pattern is to show in the finished product as a result of the system of weaving. it will not be suitable for milling or felting, because the fibers, being parallel, will not lose their individuality. it will not resist wear from friction to the same degree that woolen will, because the threads will retain their individuality and not become felted into the general mass; and thus the fabric not being so compact as woolen, it will not possess, to the same degree, the quality of retaining warmth. on the other hand, the subsequent processes through which the cloth may pass to finish it will in no way impair the pattern, and a worsted fabric is always recognized by the clearness of its pattern and the sharpness and smooth- ness of its finish, both wool and worsted being possessed of individual properties and advantages. § applied design. does not possess the freedom from fuzzy surface that raw silk does, yet many of the combed fibers are of considerable length and this makes a very strong thread well suited for the weaving of ornamental patterns. . the object of this short discussion, the manufac- ture of threads, is to enable the student to be familiar with the materials that are to be woven into a fabric, the design of which he is to execute. in the descriptions that follow of the weave of certain classes of cloths, the student can readily see wherein a knowledge of yarn or thread will be of great value in the preparation of his design. warp and weft. . plain fabrics—in the fabrics shown in fig. we have what is called a plain fabric, that is, one in which the warp and weft threads are equal in quantity and diameter, but we may alter this relation of warp and weft and by so doing obtain an increase in weight of the goods; thereby making a warmer cloth, if for wearing material, or an increase of strength, where that is a requisite quality, or, in other cases, an increase in ornamental value, if it is desired to increase the effect of ornamentation by the weave. . where the warp threads are heavier than the weft threads, the weft will naturally bend around them and cause ribs to appear lengthwise of the fabric; but where the weft threads are the heavier, the warp will bend around them and cause ribs to appear running across the fabric. the best quality of fabrics, however, are those in which the warp threads are the thinner and are arranged with a greater number to the inch than the weft threads. the weaving of these classes of goods is precisely the same as the weaving of plain cloths, but the variations of the relative quantities or thicknesses of warp or weft completely changes the character of the fabric. in goods where the weft threads are thicker than the warp threads and the warp § applied design. threads and and over the warp threads and , and so on, and that the weft thread passes over the warp thread , under the warp threads and , and over the warp threads and . this produces an ? effect that, in some goods other than “‘- i" " cloth, is called a basket weaw, but, as c ' a matter of fact, it is a simple twill upon the variation of which much designing in dress goods is accom- plished. each warp thread passes alternately over and under two weft threads, or picks, and similarly each weft thread alternately passes under and over two warp threads, but each end does not pass over the same threads as its predecessor. /j . ' llguflp/ik fig. . . this not only produces a pleasing pattern on the surface, but it enables us to introduce more material into the goods we are weaving, and, therefore, to produce a more bulky fabric that is closer in its structure. the reason of this is, that the warp and weft interweaving at greater intervals permit the skipped threads to lie closer together without any intervening transverse threads, thereby making a closer and warmer fabric. in the plain cloth, we have shown that we are able to make goods wherein the warp threads lie very closely together and, also, goods wherein the weft threads lie very closely together. in each case, the threads of the opposite system are quite a distance apart, but in the twill we are enabled to weave cloth wherein the warp and weft both lie very closely together and give an even texture in both direc- tions and, consequently, a corresponding increase in the bulk of the fabric. . the twill may be altered in detail so as to increase the bulk of the goods, simply by increasing the interval at which two sets of threads interweave. for instance, the warp thread may pass over several weft threads before it applied ,design. § interweaves again and in this way bind this number together in close contact and crowd them into a much smaller space than they would have occupied had they been interwoven alternately. but as this increase in weight is produced by the skipping of a greater number of threads, the fabric loses strength, inasmuch as it may not be properly interwoven, and a considerable amount of friction of its surface will allow these long overshot threads to become broken and to weaken the fabric by fraying. . the yarn of which the goods is woven is composed of single fibers, and when overshot for considerable distance these fibers are presented to a greater length than they may possibly be able to bear, causing a weak but warm fabric. the looseness of the fabric will also reduce its power to bear strain, and although a loosely woven cloth may be propor- tioned to its interweaving so that it will be stronger under tension than one more closely woven, yet it will never be so strong in proportion to the relative kind of material of which it is composed. . it is possible to make another order or arrange- ment in twills, wherein we abandon the idea of increasing bulk or warmth and endeavor to weave in order to acquire the greatest strength; when it is desired that the pattern shall be ornamental as well as be strong or warm, it must always be borne in mind that the character of the weave affects all three conditions—strength, warmth. and orna- mentation. the class of goods known as satin: are twills woven on a regular systematic basis; that is, the order of interweaving two sets of threads does not follow consecu- tively but at intervals. in fig. is shown the system on which a satin is woven. it will here be observed that the threads interweave at every fifth end or pick and that the two succeeding picks do not interweave with adjoining ends but at intervals of two; that is, if weft a passes over no. warp, weft b will pass over no. warp, and so on. now, if it is desired to § applied design. the fabric itself and partially of other material introduced purely for ornamentation. . in fig. we have an example of a pattern for a perfectly plain cloth on which a lozenge-shaped spot is woven, and in fig. we have a section through that cloth where, at a, the ends of the warp threads are shown and, at b, the weft thread, interweaving regularly except where it passes over the five warp threads to form the pattern in the center of the lozenge-shaped spot, as at c d. the gen- eral body of the cloth remains perfectly plain, and the pattern is formed simply by the skipping of a few threads. of course, this affects the quality of the goods somewhat and it is not so closely woven, but this b c d i?@@@@@@@@%%@@@ fig. . defect will vary according to the size and number of figures that are introduced. . in fig. we have an example of a piece of goods woven on the principle shown in fig. , and the number of spots is distributed evenly over the entire piece. each spot must be examined in its relation to each pick and warp end, in order to comprehend the pattern. the spots a each commence on the same pick, and so do the spots , , etc., and, further, we can see that a and r are also woven on the same warp ends, as are also and d, so that in reality a is a repetition of c in the direction of the warp, and z) is a repetition of d in the direction of the weft. consequently, we can see that a and b are the only two spots in the pattern, the others be- § applied design. i . .ooiooiooooo a : ...‘....... fig. . same distance apart, and the order of interweaving each respective pick and end is equal. the appearance of the finished cloth will be the same as that of fig. , but it will be more perfectly constructed and certainly more plcasin g to the eye. this system of weaving is very simple and is based on what is called an eight-end satin. in laying it out, we must calculate the area of the figure to determine the number of the ends and picks that will be re- quired to produce it, and if this num- ber does not conveniently fit in with the number of hooks contained on our farquard mar/zine,thcn we must altcr it to suit as the case may require. . the jacquard machine consists of an apparatus that is sup- ported above the loom, and by means of a number of wire hooks extend- ing to each thread of the warp in the loom, it raises certain desired warp threads and permits the shuttle with the weft ound on it to pass under the raised threads and over those that lie below. in weaving any kind of goods each throw of the shuttle is preceded by a raising of certain warp threads under which it is desired that the weft shall pass. these raised threads are usually called the “ shct ." . the design is punched on cards similar to fig. , where each hole represents one of the squares of § :) applied design. linen yarn, while the pile is of wool. the methods of spin- ning the yarns for this fabric, or any other class of goods, is precisely the same as has been described. the wool that forms the surface of the carpet is carded and spun in pre- cisely the same manner as the wool that goes intoa dress fabric. it is dyed to the color desired to be reproduced and fig. . applied design. g wound on spools ready to go into the frame behind the loom. . there have been many suggestions for economy in the manufacture of carpets, and there are many carpets manufactured that present the same general appearance as brussels but do not possess its great weight, owing to the lack of goods in the body. one form of these carpets is what is known as tapestry brussels, wherein the threads are not left idly inside the fabric, and exist only where the pile is formed. in tapestry brussels there is but one set of threads of pile warp and that is printed so as to form the pattern. the printing of the pile thread is effected by measuring out the length of a certain color required in a certain place to form the figure and that length of the thread is colored accordingly. it is then woven into the cloth as in ordinary velvet, and its pile brought to the sur- face. following it on the same thread is another color required to form the ground on another portion of the fig- ure. one printed thread thus serves for a number of col- ored ones, and it certainly is a very economical way of produ- cing'a colored carpet, but it is in no way so serviceable as the body brussels that it is attempting to imitate. . wilton carpet is the same as brussels carpet, except that the pile is cut, and another formation of velvet carpets is effected by setting the pile surface into the carpet in sec- tions just as it is required. rugs are also formed in this way. the pile threads are neither warp nor weft, but are simply tufts set in where the figure is required. the colored threads are wound on long thin cylinders or rollers, possess- ing all the colors that are necessary to form one pick across the goods. a short length of these threads is then cut off and falls in place parallel with the warp in the loom, while the weft thread passes over them and binds them into the body of the carpet. they are then cut off and the roll passes on its way and makes room for another roll to bring the next set of threads. this makes a very bulky loom, as § applied design. there must be a separate roll for each pick across the loom for every repeat. in fact, there must be one roll for every jacquard and in weaving long rugs it is not unusual to have three or four hundred of these rolls, each one of whichi used but once, to form the pattern. ' . the designing of all these goods remains the same, however, the only difference being in the design papers themselves, which must be obtained for the particular pur- pose they are required. ingrain carpet cannot be designed on brussels paper, because it does not run the same number of threads to the inch, and when designs are laid out on paper care must be given that the proper subdivisions of the paper have been obtained. x index sn cornice corona. . . cotton fibers . . “ yarn . . creatures, fabulous cross, (lreek “ latin . maltese . . . . . . saint andrew's . . . . . curtain design, lace curved lines, emphasis of. cutting,r carpets, \vastc in . cyma recta “ reversa cymatium . .l l) comparison of indian and per- sian art “ “ persian and ara- bian art composite order composition. . . . . . conditions influencing ture . conic sections. . . . . . . . consideration of purpose in design consistency in design. . . . “ of egyptian ornament “ moorish ornament construction allied with beauty . “ and decoration in moorish art . of design, selection of system of . moorish geomet- rical ornament systems of constructive origin of decorative art. . . ornament continuity of lines . . . contrast and variety . . . . . " variety, and rcpctitio conventional ornament . . . " treatment of nature conventionalism . . . . “ and realism . egyptian explanation of (ircck in ancient art " moorish orna- ment . . . . influence of . kinds of . . necessity of of egyptian orna- ment " facts " principles ideas taste in. . . conventionalizini,r a plant form . ‘° animal forms corinthian base . . " capital . . order ll architec- ' roman corner ornament (‘orncrs borders, and stripes \ nacq ‘. page ‘ me an (i ll") l).- h) : 'l i; “ !; ivv ' q t t |_:. ' lv ‘ ‘ damasks, size of repeat in . de'l‘hou. decorated capitals. characteris- tics of. . . “ period......... decorating, effects of vertical and horizontal . . . . . . . decoration, adaptability of. . . . “ ancient pottery and construction in moorish art " arabian “ ceiling “ elements of ‘ floor . . general rules of sur- face in . . “ meaning of . . . . . . “ principles of . . . . “ surface........ " “ geometrical basis of . decorations, painted roman . . decorative art. . . . . . . . " " constructive origin of ornament . theory exhibited by the savage defective design . defects, remedy for definition of bisymmctry . . " " inflorescence . . inventive ornament . multisymmetry . trisymmetry . . . . unit . . h sec. page i s ‘ l ‘ index growth . . . . . . . . . guilloche . . . . . . . . . gutta: - o g u i - u u u i v o hackling. . hagia sophia hall, hypostylc . . . . . “ “ at karnak of assembly . . . . . . . . . hanap . . handles. consideration of. in de- signing vases and cups hanging fabrics. . hangings and table covers. bor- ders for harmachis . . . . . . . . . harmony in adaptation of human figure to design secondary lines head of medusa . . . . . . . . . . heating of ancient castles . . . . heavy antique egyptian alphabet heraldry. . . . . . . . . . " in french art historic lettering ll cl i a u o - - ~ . ¢ i - - | . - o ¢ n a i o a u - e n c modern use of. object of study- ing . . . . . . value of study ' of . . . . . . . oi oi holbein holland and england, political ties of horn. . . . . how to bisect a given angle " “ study ornament . . . . . . humanfigure... “ figure, application of wings to . . . . . figure. details of, com- bined with animal and floral forms. . . . . . figure. difficulty of tree rendering of . figure. harmony in adap- tation of. to design . . figure, proportions of figure used in design . . . figures as supports. . . . hyperbola . . " methodofdrawing. . . method of drawing tan- gent to hypostyle hall . “ " at karnak. . . . . - q - u v ' n n . . - - i o - - ~ - a o - - q’il-‘n l'i :fl ;! ti srr. i new h - ' ti i t; h () ‘ ‘ . g u n u u a - l l n o a i . i i idealism and chinese ornament. imaginary beasts . . . . . . . . . imitation and invention. . . . . indian and persian art compared art . . . . . . . . . . . . . " arrangement of orna- ment in . . . . . “ “ lack of progressive— nessin........ " fabrics. rules of coloring . ornament . . . . . .. .. characteristics of industrial elements; association of, with architectural elements in design ornament . . . . . . . infloresence, definition of. . . . . influence of architecture a u i ~ ' conventionalism . " italian art in german renaissance " mohammedanism " " nature . . . . . . . religion . . " " " in egyptian ornament in gothic art 'the church . . . " “ " nile on egyptian ornament. . . influences affecting different styles ofart. . . . . . . . . . . . ingenuity of byzantine ornament insects in design . . . . . . . . . intention of renaissance artists . interior of egyptian temple. . . . intricacy of celtic ornament introduction of renaissance art into england . renaissance art into england . renaissance art into france. . invention and imitation . . . . of printing. i‘lfi’ect of . . inventive ornament. definition of ionic architrave . . " order . . . . . . . . . . . . . ll roman . . . . . . . . . ironwork, renaissance . . italian art and literature " " roman influence on . . aversion to gothic form . . design of the eighteenth century srr. page ti o i l ti i (h ‘ index ornament. geom etrical . . l. . uotllic.. “ evolution of . . grecwroman . . greek . . . . . . " representative types of historic. modern use of “ o b j e c t of studying value of study of. . history of . how to study indian characteristics of industrial . . ingenuity of byzantine japanese linear . meaning of moorish . . . . " blending ofcol- ors in characteristics of . . . . . . coloring in consistency of convention- alism in . . . geometrical. co nstruction of natural . . . . . origin of gothic and byzanfine persian pompeian primitive . . . . primitiveness of chi- nese renaissance . representative roman . . romanesque style in surface threads turkish type of vegetable \vestern a o u ¢ . i derivation of .- iq“ lb“ . amuawuua-aawv se‘l'. i’ill'i‘ h '.) in . i h( l s" ‘ ‘» ()rnament. wings in . . . . . . ornamentath in checker pattern for fabric . of fabrics . . “ " " layingr out . ' pile fabrics reversion of treat- ment in . ()siris . . . . . . . outline, limit of. . . . . . . . . oval in nature. . . . . . . . . " repetition. contrast, and va- riety expressed in the . . l) painted roman decorations . . paneling . papyrus parabola. . . . . . . . . . . parallclogram, design based on the . . . . . parent stem . . parthenon . . pattern, ball . . . . . . . . “ l)rop........ ’i‘urn~oyer-and-drop " unit of . . . . patterns, limitless variety of . . pedestal, roman doric . . . . . . tuscan people. types of n g u u . periods of french renaissance . . perpendicular characters . . " period . persian and arabian art com- pared . . . . . . ornament. tics of . . . . . . pilastcr forms of treatment . pilasters . pile fabrics " “ ()rnamentation of . . plain fabrics. . . . . . . . . planning and drawing the design . " design . . . . . . . turn-over method in design . . . . . . . plan of egyptian temple l’lant form, conventionalizing a political tics of england and h - land . . . . . polychromy pompeian art in \iq'jqqoidwib q mu ;! l l ‘ ' ]!) ' |) ‘ s ls w) ~ - index xxi wall surface. naturalistic treat- ment of ' warp and weft in different colors, effect of pile fabrics threads \vaste in cutting carpets . . t. . . weave, basket . . . . . . . . . . weaving . . . . . . . . . . . . . . “ effect of twist weft pile in fabrics “ threads \vestcrn art . . . . . . . . . . ornament . . . . . . . . wilton carpets . . . . . . . . . . . window tracery, french winged disk . . . " globe . . . . . . . . . . . wings. application of . . . “ \ " "to human figure assyrian method of attach- ing. to human figure i - s n a - o n n y q . . l n i u . n i . s s | n n a - . a i - o i g o c spf. p r has- wiqu‘\iio e w in“ ' k ' a \i o)- ..l ')— -i fi-l - \vings, egyptian method of at- taching, to human figure in ornament . . . . . . . . proportions of . . . . . . . wivern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . wool fibers . . . . . . . . . . . for spinning. preparing- . . \voolen yarn . . . . . . . . . . . . \vorsted thread. characteristics of " yarn i n e u n n a i a n " silk . . . . . . . . . . . . . s u n e n n - n e a n q u a - knitting and carpet z zenith of architectural develop- ment sec. page library of the university of californire library of the university of california - library of the university of calipur . library of the university of california library of the watersity of galleorm - thtversity of calie cary of the universi (berli sity of california library of the university of california library of the univers vw itvu aisano of the university of california library of the university of calie burele by:d berkeler ਸਰਗਰ relay berbece sound library of the university of california library of the university of calieorna library of the us berkele ਸਰਗਰ ਦੀ brary of the university of california - library of the university of californua library of the university of california yths berreece berkele daud ਸਿਰਧੜ ਦੀ tester bertele lifornia y of california library of the ਸਰਧਾਰ berkele berkies ibrary of the university of california beckley berkeley fornia library qf californik library of the university of california - library of the university of california - library of the un library of the university of california library of the university of california e library of the unyersity of california library ॥ ॥ ਸਰਗਰ library of the university of california library of the university of california library of the university of california bechele ਗੋਬਰ lifornia ॥ berkele ਰਹਰਦੀ lib ॥ ਸਿਨਕਰ ਹੀ berkeley caraby california ਦੇ ae ਬਆਦ ਖike as੪੩aimn ੪੪ ੪॥ - uveasiti :) (versit rsity of california - library of the university of califorurary of the uniyersity of california ar tre: choragic monument of lysikrates. lon historic ornament treatise on decorative art and architectural ornament treats of prehistoric art'; ancient art and archi- tecture; eastern, early christian, byzantine, saracenic, romanesque, gothic, and renaissance architecture and ornament. by james ward author of the principles of ornament.” with four hundred and thirty-six illustrations london: chapman and hall, limited i london: printed by william clowes and sons, limited, duke street, stamford street, s.e., and great windmill street, w. preface. the comprehensive nature of the subject of this work renders it impossible to deal with its various divisions and sub-divisions, except in a very condensed manner, within the limits of a handbook for students. i have endeavoured to present to the reader, and to the student of ornamental and decorative art, some of the salient features which characterize the historic styles of ornament, and those that seem to me to show themselves as landmarks in the wide domain of historic ornament. realistic decoration was the earliest form of all art, as we find it in the etchings on the bones drawn by the pre- historic cave-dwellers; but ornamental design or pattern drawing is a kind of invention which implies the orderiy decoration of architectural forms and other objects, and is generally applied to such objects with the view of adding some enrichment that shall make them more pleasing to the sight. the former belongs more to pictorial art, while the latter is purely decorative. as the construction of ornament, in a great measure, ought to be based on the laws that govern the design of good architecture--this we gather from the design of the best ornament of the historic styles-it has been thought necessary to give a slight sketch of each of the principal vi preface. orders and styles of architecture, placing them, as far as possible, in a chronological sequence in regard to the periods of their existence, and countries in which they flourished. in some cases i have also thought it desirable to give a brief account of the religion of those nations that have created distinct styles of architecture and ornament; for in many cases, such as in the art of the ancient world and of the middle ages, we find that the art of a country was so bound up with the religion of its people, that to understand the former it is indispensable to have some knowledge of their religious ceremonies and beliefs. i have here to express my indebtedness to various writers on ornamental art whom i have named in the pages of these volumes for some useful points of informa- tion, and to them and the publishers of this work for the use of the greater portion of the blocks of illustrations. i have also to thank mr. t. m. lindsay for the use of his drawing of the monument of lysikrates, and the science and art department for permission to use many of the illustrations of their excellent handbooks on deco- rative art. in a succeeding volume to this work, the various divisions of the industrial arts and crafts will be treated in their historical developments of decoration and work- manship. in conclusion, i trust that the contents of these pages will be helpful to students in art schools, and to others who may desire to have an introduction to the fascinating study of historic ornament. j. ward. contents. pagr introductory chapter i chapter ii. prehistoric ornament-palÆolithic period or early stone age-river drift and cave-men chapter iii. neolithic stone period . chapter iv. the bronze age. chapter v. the iron age chapter vi. the lake dwellings of switzerland and other parts of europe viii contents chapter vii. page history architecture - industrial egyptian art arts chapter viii. chaldean and assyrian art-history-architecture- industrial art ii . chapter ix. phenician art – history trading – architecture industrial art-art in cyprus chapter x. art in ancient persia history architecture decoration chapter xi. grecian art-people-mythology chapter xii. tiryns art in primitive greece mycenÆ - troy architecture-industrial art chapter xiii. greek and roman orders of architecture — lycian tombs - greek orders – etruscan architecture- roman orders contents. ix chapter xiv. pagr greek and roman architectural ornament– pompeian architecture chapter xv. indian art and architecture chapter xvi. chinese and japanese architecture . chapter xvii. early christian architecture - byzantine architec- ture chapter xviii. saracenic architecture and ornament chapter xix. romanesque architecture and ornament chapter xx. gothic architecture and ornament chapter xxi. renaissance architecture and ornament list of illustrations. fig. . . . . . monument of lysikrates . alabaster frieze . alabaster frieze plan . alhambra diaper, superposed ornament . . ambo or pulpit from st. george's at salonica . . amen or ammon . amenophis iii. presenting an offering to amen . ancient panel, florence . . andro-sphinx, robe of assurbanipal . anou, or dagon, nimroud . anthemion, carved . animal ornamented patterns, corrupted figures of lions . . antelope and papyrus . apollo belvedere . arabesque ornament from the wekāla of kait bey . . arcades in the mosque of ibn-tülün . arches : a, ogee; b, horseshoe; c, pointed . architrave and frieze, mycenian palace . assyrian standard . assyrian base in limestone . assurbanipal attacked by lions . assyrian capital . assurbanipal and his queen after his victory over teuman . assyrian stool . astarte, terra-cotta . athene polias (villa albani) . babylonian brick . barbarian copy of a roman medallion . base of pillar at susa . base and capital from persepolis, propylæa . base and capital, from hypostyle hall of xerxes, persepolis . bas-relief on the arch of titus page frontispiece i . • . xii list of illi'strations. fig. page . berkeley castle, gloucestershire a. bishopstone church, wilts, priests' entrance . bottle with incised ornament, from cesnola . bottle with geometric decoration . bowl in the piot collection . bouquet of flowers and buds . border from thebes . breast-plate, with spiral ornaments . . bronze axes, paalstabs, and moulds . . . ) . . . . bronze swords and spear-head . . . . . bronze button for sword belt . . bronze bowl found in sweden . bronze hatchet found in sweden . bronze horn . . bronze and gold buttons . . . . it . . bracteate, golden . . bronze foot of a piece of furniture . . bronze platter . bronze cups . bronze cup, border of . bronze bucket . brahminical rock temple at ellora . brick from erech . byzantine capital from santa sophia . cameo of athenion . . capital of temple, assyrian . . capital, cypriot . . . capital at djezza, limestone . capital from kition . capital from golgos . capital of the lysikrates monument list of illustrations. xiii fig. page · iqi. . capital from santa sophia . capital from st. demetrius at salonica capital from st. demetrius . capital from wartburg . capital from palace of barbarossa . capital from st. cross, winchester . carpenters vaking chairs . carthaginian coin, silver . . carthaginian coin, electrum . cathedral of notre dame, paris . ceiling decoration at thebes . ceiling by serlio . ceiling by sansovino . certosa of pavia, portion of . chair, egyptian chariot horses . cinquecento ornament . . . . coin of byblos, enlarged, with sacred cone . coins of elis, with the phidian zeus . . coffer in wood . collar of bronze . cologne cathedral, window gable . column of thothmes iii., from the ambulatory of thothmes column from hypostyle hall of the ramesseum . column from bas-relief . . column with volute capital, persepolis . combat between a lion and a unicorn ;. cornice from santa sophia . corrupted figures of lions . . crockets, lincoln . crowing wall of the staircase, palace of xerxes, at persepolis . . cusped inter-arching, mosque of cordova . cursive writing from the alhambra . cylinder from soldi . cylinder, assyrian. worship of sacred tree . danish bronze knives . decorated mouldings from temple of minerva, polias . demons, from the palace of assurbanipal . detail from the enamelled archivolt, khorsabad . detail of the decoration of a cup . diana of versailles i o. xiv list of illustrations. fig. page • . dietterlin's architecture . dionysus and the lion . dolmen at hesbon. . doorway of a private house . door of st. gabriel's, south of france . dog used for lion hunting . dog's tooth ornament, stone church, kent ja. drawing of human and animal forms by bushmen . b. drawing of animals by bushmen . eagle headed divinity from nimrod, with sacred tree . earring, gold, from cesnola earthenware of the new stone age i . . iio . . . . . . east colonnade of the mosque of 'amr . egyptian ship . elevations and sections of doorways and windows of a palace at persepolis a. embroidery from a royal mantle, assyrian a. embroidery on the upper part of a king's mantle . embroidery detail of upper part of king's mantle . . . enamelled ornament on bricks from susa . enamelled earthenware dish . enamelled earthenware bowl entablature from a temple at byblos . entablature restored, mycenian palace . entablature of c. selinous’ temple . . entablature, capital, and base of greek ionic temple . entablature of jupiter tonans . entrance to hypostyle, hall of temple amen . esquimaux carving . etching of reindeer on bone . etching of reindeer on slate . etching of mammoth on a piece of mammoth ivory . etruscan door . façade of the great rock-cut temple, ipsamboul . fantastic animal . farnese palace, upper story of . feast of assurbanipal, enlarged detail . fibula in gilt bronze . figure of a goddess in act of adoration . fire altars at naksh-i-rustem . . flattened form of lotus-leaf ornament ii ii list of illustrations. xv fig. page . . flamboyant panel . flamboyant panelling . flint implements of the neolithic period . . ii. . . . . . . . . floral ornament, italian . florence cathedral, window gable . fragment of an ivory castanet . fragment of border of fig. ; from a threshold of khorsabad . fragment of an assyrian building, from a bas-relief . fragment of door frame, from hypostyle hall, susa . fragment of frieze, mycenæ . frets, greek . fret, greek, carved . funeral tower at naksh-i-rustem . gates of the harum at dur sargini . gateway of temple of confucius . giant's tomb, sardinia . goddess bast or pasht . gold bowl . gold-plated ornament . golden hawk, egyptian . gold bracelet, from tharros . gold pendant, from troy. . gold ornaments, from troy . gold plate, from troy . gold disc, from troy . . gold cup, from troy . gold ewer, from troy . “gorge,” egyptian . gothic arches . . gothic tracery . . gothic mouldings . general appearance of an egyptian temple . great pyramid of kheops . great sphinx . greek border with fret bands . greek ivy meander border . griffin in egyptian style . . . . . . . . . xvi list of illustrations. fig. page ; . . . guilloche ornament on enamelled brick . . guilloche, treble ornament . guilloche, ornament, double . half capital, mars ultor . . harness in gilt bronze, fibula decorations . hathoric pier. . hathor-headed campaniform capital, temple of nectanebo, at philæ . head of one of the lions from frieze at susa . head of hera . hermes, statue of . holland house, ancient parlour of . horse, upper cave earth, robin hood cave . hunting in a marsh, from a bas-relief in the tomb of ti . hunting in the desert . ibex carved on an antler . ideal lake settlement . illuminated korān of the sultan sha' ban . intaglio on chalcedony . italian panel . interior of a temple aſter layard's restoration . interior of the palace at delhi . . intersecting blind arcade isis nursing her son horus . ivory plaque . ivory plaque found at nimroud . ivory fragment in british museum . ivory plaque from mycenze . jewish candlestick from arch of titus . khita, rout of the . . kufic writing, from the alhambra . lacustrine habitation in lake mohrya, central africa . lake dwellings, sections and plans . . landgrave's room at wartburg . lake dwellings, objects fro . lattice-work, saracenic . . . . . ioi . lion from a theban bas-relief . lion coming out of his cage . lion and lioness in a park . lion from the lion frieze in enamelled bricks at susa . lion's gate, mycena . lotus, drawing from the tomb of ptah-hotep . lotus and water-leaf ornament . luxor, plan of temple list of illustrations. xvii fig. page . i . . . . luxor, as restored, bird's-eye view . lycian rock-built tomb . . . marienberg town hall . marseilles ewer . mausoleum at cairo . medallion from a cup from griffi . melpomene, vatican . menhirs, sardinia . memnon at thebes, statues of, colossi of amenophis iii. . minaret of the mosque at kaloum, cairo . . model of an egyptian house . mountings, metal . . model of a small temple in terra cotta . . moorish capital . mosque of kaīt bey, cairo . mummy-case, painting on . mural painting, pompeii . . mural painting, from pompeii . naksh-i-rustem, general view of the rock-cut tombs . nest of scroll, roman . netting birds, from a tomb . norman doorway, semperingham church, lincolnshire . nymphæa nelumbo . . oblong building, egyptian . (enochæ, new york museum . . ogee decorated-astragal, jupitor stator . ornament from asoka's pillar. . ornament from the portal of sultan hasan . ornament, ghiberti gates . ornament on an arch of the wekāla kait bey . ornament from doorway, crewe hall . ogee and fluted cavetto moulding; jupiter tonans . osiris . ovolo with egg and tongue, from the erectheum . ovolo and astragal mouldings, roman . opus alexandrinum pavement . painted ornament on plaster . painting from the catacombs of st. agnese . pallus athene, naples . palm capital from sesebi . parthenon; greek doric . . panel from the maristan of kalaun . xviii list of illi'strations. fig. page . . + . . . . panel, carved, henri ii. style . . french, sixteenth century . from louvre . elizabethan . panelling, elizabethan . patera from curium . . pectoral; egyptian . pedestal, henry vii.'s chapel . . pendant, wild goat ; gold . perfume spoons . . persepolis; tomb on the north-east . persepolis; staircase of the palace of darius . persepolis; doorway to royal tomb . pier with capital . pilasters, louis xii. . pilaster by donatello . pilgrim bottle . . pillar, octagonal, beni-hassan . . pillar, sixteen-sided, fluted . pillar osiride, from medinet-abou . pillar and bracket, doorway of a pagoda . . phoenician merchant galley . phænician war galley . phænician silver platter . pinak or plate, from rhodes . pitcher of red earth . place house, cornwall . plan and elevation of a part of a façade at worka . plan of the mosque of 'amr . pointed arcading from the cathedral of palermo . polished stone hammer and celts, neolithic period . . . . . pompeian objects . porch of the heilsbronn monastery . porch of st. zeno at verona . pottery of the iron age . prehistoric carving . . principal hall in the great temple . . principal façade of the temple of luxor . ptah . pulpit of the sultan kait bey . pulpit in the mosque of barkuk ; stone . list of illustrations. xix fig. page ioo . iio . ii. quadrangular pier . quadrangular pier, tapering . quadruped with head of a bird . ram or krisosphinx rameses ii., louvre, portrait of . rim of fig. , part of . river transport of a mummy . roman corinthian, pantheon . romanesque shaft and base . romanesque ornament, late . romanesque moulding ornaments . romanesque ornament from hinge from “ notre dame” . romanesque panel from a church at bonn . roof cornice of church at alstadt . rose window . rosette in mosque of suyurghatmish . rosette of lotus flowers and buds . . rosette from trajan's scroll . round-arch frieze. . roman composite order; arch of titus . sacred emblems from carthaginian votive stele . san marco library . sanchi tope; bhopal, central india . sargon's palace . sargon's palace, a bedroom in the harem . sarvistan, palace of, principal façade . section through the great pyramid of kheops . . seti with attributes of osiris between amen and chnoum . sill of a door from khorsabad. . silver pin; cesnola . . silver brooch . silver goblet, with gold-plated decorations . southern pyramid of dashour . . solar-disk, adoration of, by amenophis iv. . square building ; egyptian . staircase wall of the palace of xerxes at persepolis . stalactite vaulting . stepped pyramid . st. paul and st. louis façade . st. nicholas at moscow . strozzi palace, portion of . street in cairo . sun signs . sun snakes . spandrel, stone church, kent . . sphinx, or man-headed lion; from tanis . xx list of illustration's. fig. page . sphinx with human hands . st. lawrence, porch of . st. lawrence, interior of . . st. sebaldus, shrine of . st. sebaldus, bride's door of . tabernacle from the balâwât gates . tabernacle, fifteenth century . . temple on the bank of a river, khorsabad . temple in a royal park. . temple of biskurma at ellora . temple church, from the . tomb at amrit, restored . . towers and round-arch frieze, abbey of komberg . tree of liſe, upper portion of . triumphal gate at entrance of the palace . three-handled amphora . . under side of a fibula . urns of the bronze age ii stud of th . cipa h for h were devel key to oman . . urn of the stone age, found in swedish dolmen . upper part of parapet wall of staircase, susa . upright of royal throne, naksh-i-rustem . vase in woman's form . . vase with geometric decoration . venus of milo . . venetian panel . vessels figured in tomb of rekhmara . vessel in shape of a goat . victory, figure of . view of a group of domed buildings, from an assyrian bas-relief . votive stele from carthage, with sacred emblems . vultures on a ceiling . wall painting, from catacombs of s. calixtus . . wall painting, pompeii . wall painting, herculaneum . westminster abbey . . winged globe with uræus . winged bull, assyria . winged globe, with the figure of a god . . winged globe . winged sphinx carrying base of capital . wollaton house . woollen cloth with gold and silver threads, piece of . zeus of otricoli some waves that it the decora droust conver . tết thì wally vol historic ornament. introductory chapter. it can hardly be doubted that, for the education of the student in ornamental design, or in architecture, a study of the history of ornament and a knowledge of the prin- cipal historic styles of architecture is indispensable. historic styles of ornament remain for us, vast accu- mulations of tried experiments, for the most part in the character of conventional renderings of natural forms; for however remote from nature some of these may be, they can, as a general rule, be traced back without much difficulty to their natural origin, where in most cases they were used symbolically. even the most arbitrary forms- for instance, those found in saracenic ornament-were only developments from natural forms, and the innocent greek key pattern, that has earned the reputation of being the ornament most unlike anything in nature, is supposed by some to be but a rectilineal development of the rippling waves; and, on the other hand, there is the hypothesis that it is developed from the fylfot, a sacred sign that is supposed to symbolize the rotary motion of the planets. there is no ornament more common or so universal in prehistoric, savage, egyptian, assyrian and mediæval decoration than the ubiquitous zigzag, or chevron, and though extremely simple in itself, at least two-thirds of all conventional ornament is based or constructed on its lines : yet this simple ornament has been used as a symbol of totally opposite and different things, by nearly all the vol. i. b historic ornament. various tribes and nations that have used it in decoration. with the egyptians and assyrians it has been a symbol of water, with some savage tribes it denotes lightning, with others it does duty for a serpent, with some others it represents a series of bats, birds, and butterflies; as with the original tribes of brazil, with the magic-loving semang tribes of east malacca, it means a frog, and in some in- stances the branches of trees; and lastly, with the natives of the hervey islands, it symbolizes the human figure when placed in duplicate parallel rows. (for a fuller description, and illustrations of this and cog- nate savage ornament, the reader is referred to haddon's “evolution in art,” .) we can hardly think of an ornament more simple or more common than the zigzag, and yet how varied in different countries are the sources from which it springs. this may be taken as a warning that it is not safe to accept the same forms as always having the same origin, when we find them in the art of different countries. apart from the symbolic origin of ornamental forms, students of to-day may learn, from examples of the past, how far they can go, in the converting of natural forms to conventional ornament, without absolutely adapting such examples to their present needs. the past styles in orna- ment have, in one sense, died out with the nations that created them, and can never be satisfactorily revived, although, as we have often seen, a new style may be built on their foundations. the tendency of to-day is to under- value the teachings of historic art, and, as a result, we see much work in which both fitness and beauty are con- spicuous by their absence. in any notice of the historical development of orna- mental art, the concurrent styles of architecture should, in their general features at least, be illustrated, for it is not always possible to divorce ornament from architecture, and it is hardly possible to design or construct good orna- ment otherwise than according to the laws that govern introductory chapter. more good architecture. of course, we must admit that some very beautiful ornament, or rather decoration, has been designed otherwise than on architectural lines, but this kind of decoration has its beauty of technique and execu- tion to recommend it, rather than its constructive qualities. chinese and japanese ornament will occur to the reader as examples of this kind of work, but the best ornament the world has ever seen has been constructed and is based on the laws that govern good architecture. some of these laws, such as stability, repose, variety, and proportion, are derived from nature. as all architec- tural styles, however, possess them or less in common, we must look elsewhere for the sources from which the peculiar characteristics that distinguish the styles are developed and derived. the causes and forces are so subtle and the developments so gradual, that it is almost impossible to arrive at a satisfactory explanation, as religions, inventive faculty, and symbolism play an important role in style development. it is rather to the inventive faculties of man, than to hints supplied by nature, that we must look for the origin and development of what is called style in architecture or ornament. in every case this is arrived at by a slow process, and by the extensive and persistent use of distinguishing features selected according to the needs and requirements of the time, to satisfy the prevailing tastes. “style" is then the something that man has invented or created; it may be called the soul of architecture, without which, a building, however pretentious, ceases to exist as an artistic conception. apart from the greatest or more striking features in the various divisions of historic architecture, such as the horizontal beam in greek, the round arch in roman and romanesque, the pointed arch in gothic and moham- madan buildings, there are the mouldings that are so important in determining the period- they alone of them- selves will often determine the style or date of a building historic ornament. -and these features, above all others, are the least derived from nature. on the other hand, the decoration of mould- ings, though suggested by their contours, is generally derived from natural forms. the “best period ” in the life of historic styles and its duration corresponds with that of the highest culture and religious thought of the people, at their settled and most flourishing epochs. when a change or revolution in the order of things sets in, we find generally the style of architecture changing also to adapt itself to the new laws and new thought. this illustrates, to a certain degree, the reason why the so-called victorian gothic has not developed to any great extent in england, although some of our best architects sought to revive the earlier gothic some years ago. the medieval mysticism, love for symbolism, and reve- rence are wanting in the mass of the people of this century, which characterized the people of europe in the palmy days of gothic architecture. it has always been found that whatever the people ask for the artist is generally able to give, although he may not be always willing; but he must satisfy the popular demand if he is to live by his work, otherwise he must make way for others who are willing to produce work that will reflect the taste of the period. we are handicapped in the development of anything new in the way of an architectural style by traditions of the past. our knowledge of what has been done in the past, paradoxical as it may appear, has proved itself a great stumbling-block to the progress of new ideas. this partly accounts for the slowness of style-development in the present century. if fashion does not step in and dis- turb the march of events in the immediate future, we may hope for something distinct, if not exactly new, as an architectural style, in which a mixture of gothic and renaissance forms will be seen, the latter perhaps pre- dominating. it may happen that later generations will introductory chapter look back and be able to discern something distinct in the way of style in buildings erected in the last quarter of this century, in the midst of much that is somewhat chaotic and confused. in a book like this, which is intended chiefly as an introduction to the study of historic ornament, one cannot pretend to criticise the various styles of ornament, either from an artistic or scientific standpoint. it will be enough to attempt to point out the principal beauties or charac- teristics, to trace the history and overlapping of one style with another, and to trace, where possible, some units of ornamental forms to their symbolic ancestry. it is absurd to criticise the ornament of any period or country dog- matically, for we must remember, that although certain forms of art may not conform to the critics' idiosyncrasy, they may be quite orthodox and good art when judged by the artistic laws of their own country. the difference in race, religion, manners, and customs, must always be taken into account, before we begin to criticise the art of a nation to which we do not belong. as already remarked, we are hanipered by tradition in our attempts to produce originality in ornament, but there is very little tradition for the absolute copying of a par- ticular style, except from nations who have had no decided art of their own. as far as we know of the history and practice in the whole field of ornamental design, from its remote beginnings it has been mostly all along a series of systems of developments, sometimes for good and some- times for the opposite, but rarely, if ever, a system of copying. some notable exceptions to this may be noticed, as when, for the expediencies known as “tricks of the trade,” the phænicians made ivory carvings in exact imitation of egyptian designs, and sold them to the assyrians; and likewise bronze bowls and platters in both assyrian and egyptian imitations, and traded with them throughout the Ægean and mediterranean, or when the siculo-arabian silks were made at palermo in imitation historic ornament. of saracen designs, with mock-saracenic inscriptions, and sold for the real articles. other instances might be cited, but these were among the most successful. as regards the purity of styles it may be safely said, that, with rare exceptions, it is well-nigh impossible to find a well-designed and complete scheme of decoration, or a building that will stand the test of having perfect unity in style; in fact, it may be more artistic on account of its incompleteness in this respect, for any work of art that is designed by receipt, like the egyptian temples or mohammadan ornament, is rather wearisome. it is plea- sant to see at times a little bit showing here and there of the designer's individuality. when the monotonous repe- tition of the laws peculiar to any arbitrary style are broken by a wilful and, perhaps, sinful artist, we often get a refreshing and original rendering that is not by any means displeasing. in transitional design from one style to another, much beautiful work may be seen. in connection with this the byzantine style may be mentioned, with its classic and oriental forms, elizabethan, jacobean, lombard gothic, and the french styles of henri deux and françois jer, in most of which gothic and renaissance forms are happily blended; and in the beautiful siculo-arabian textiles, where italian and saracenic forms make an interesting union. we learn from these examples that the successful designer of ornament should have a thorough knowledge of the historic styles, not for the purpose of reproducing their forms, but in order to discover for himself the methods by which the old artists arrived at the successful treatment of nature and of former styles, so that by the application of his knowledge, derived from the study of nature and the works of former artists, he may be enabled to give to the world some original and interesting work. chapter ii. prehistoric ornament palÆolithic period or early stone age-river drift and cave-men. the first indications of the presence of man in britain was brought to light in the shape of a flint flake found by the rev. o. fisher, in the presence of professor w. boyd dawkins, in the lower brick earth of the stoneham pit at crayford, in kent, in the year . in the year a second flake was found in a similar situation at erith, in kent, considerably worn by use. this form of implement was used in the late pleistocene age, and also in the neolithic (newer stone age) and bronze ages. it was employed in the historic ages by the egyptians, and by the romanized britons of sussex, in whose tombs it has been found. this implement is the latest survival of the palæolithic age. geologists have proved that ireland, england and europe were united in the palæolithic age, and this ac- counts for the similarity of stone implements and other remains found in the river-drift deposits, in caves, and other situations in the river valley over this vast area. the roughly chipped flint implements are termed palæo- lithic, or of the old stone age, in contradistinction to the smoother, finer chipped, or polished implements of the neolithic or newer stone age. it seems highly probable that the asiatic palæolithic man first swarmed off the great plateau of central asia, which in later times was the home of all those tribes that invaded europe, india, and china, and certainly were of a race that is now as extinct as the prehistoric mammoth historic ornament. itself. the relation between the river-driſt men of asia and europe is doubtful. we may not be able to refer the palæolithic cave-men to any present branch of the human race, but as regards their artistic abilities, the only savage people that bear any analogy to them in the present day fig. .--horse, upper cave earth, robin hood cave. . is the south african tribe of bushmen. these people, however, are much inferior as artists to the early cave- men, which may be seen by comparing the work of both (figs. a and b). from the drawings of animals which have been found fig .- ibex carved on antler. etched and carved on bone, horn, and stones, we can judge. of the high qualifications of the cave-men as artists. their work in animal drawing ranks higher than that of any historic savage race, and as artists they were infinitely of prehistoric ornament. a higher order than their more scientific successors, the neolithic men, or the men of the bronze age. it was owing to the discovery of these bone and ivory etchings that geologists were able to definitely connect the cave-men of the thames valley with those of france, belgium, and switzerland. at cresswell crags, in derby- fig. .-prehistoric carving. shire, in the caves, caverns, and fissures known as the pin hole, robin hood's cave, mother grundy's parlour, a great quantity of bones have been found, some of which were broken by the hand of man, and amongst these some flint implements in the lower cave earth. above this in the stalagmatic breccia more bones were found and imple- fig. .- esquimaux carving. ments made of quartzite and flint, together with fragments of charcoal. lance heads, flint borers, a bone awl, and a fragment of bone ornamented with a zigzag or chevron pattern-probably the oldest bit of ornament known-were found together with the most important find of all, namely, a piece of rib bone with an etching of a horse's head and neck with a hogged mane (fig. ), the first instance of an prehistoric o.rnament. ii and the cave-men lived in caverns in this country and in france, as some savages do now. implements of the fig. .--etching of reindeer on slate. palæolithic age have been found in europe, north africa, asia minor and india. the earlier river-drift man was a fig. .-etching of mammoth on a piece of mammoth ivory. savage and lived by hunting, as no evidence of culture has been found that can be ascribed to him. after unknown ages perhaps had elapsed the cave-men appear with more historic ornament. perfect instruments, and at least cultured in the knowledge of drawing and carving, which they did, as can be judged by the illustration given, with astonishing ability. the accurate forms of animals, as horses, mammoths, bears, aurochs, elks, reindeers, fish, seals, &c., and even attempts at the human figure, are evidences of this. some authors see a certain analogy between the cave- men and the esquimaux of the present day. in artistic culture, however, the cave-men are immeasurably supe- fig. a: – human and animal form, drawn by bushmen of south africa. rior to the latter, as may be seen by comparing their respective efforts (figs. , , , ). the cave-men disappeared from britain after it became an island. similar discoveries of implements and other remains in europe and britain prove that the cave-men of both countries were in the same stage of culture. pottery has never been found in connection with the remains of these people. in france many important finds have been brought to light illustrating the art work of the european cave-men. in the caves at perigord, at bruniquel on the aveyron, at prehistoric ornament. le moustier, at la madelaine in the dordogne, and in the duruthy cave at laugerie basse, in the western pyrenees, have been found many engravings of animals, and carv- ings on bone, smooth teeth, and antlers, also on sandstone, slate, and schist. evidences of the cave-men using skins for clothing is inferred from the engraving of skin-gloves and other things found incised on the teeth of the great cave-bear in the duruthy caves. hunting scenes were fig. b.—animal forms, drawn by bushmen. often engraved with great fidelity, and carved dagger- handles made from the antlers of deer, with the animal itself sometimes carved on them. one of the highest art examples yet found is that of a reindeer grazing, and is the only object on which an attempt is made to represent herbage, and perhaps water (fig. ). this interesting relic was found in the kesslerloch cavern. chapter iÏi. neolithic stone period. this period is divided from the palæolithic stone age by a great unknown gap. it is sometimes called the later or newer stone age. in this period the flint implements were better shaped, many of them were ground and polished (figs. , ). some of the flint and other stone implements were very like in form to those of the bronze period, and as these implements were made, and continued to be used, in northern europe after the bronze periods of the east had developed, it is quite possible that they were copied from the bronze objects (figs. , , , ). a remarkable sickle or knife fourteen inches long is seen at fig. il; a flint saw (fig. ), semicircular knives or saws at figs. , , and a bone and flint harpoon at fig. . some of the stone hammers or axes are of great beauty in shape and in workmanship (figs. , ); also pottery slightly burnt, but well decorated by incised straight lines and zigzags (figs. to ). the cultivation of land, the breeding and rearing of domestic animals, plaiting, and weaving was known and practised by these people. amber, bone beads, and shells were used as personal adornments. their burials were with or without cremation. the burial-places of these people are found all over the world, in europe, japan, india, and other parts of asia, and in north america. they are named “cromlechs" (stone circles), “dolmen" (stone tables) (fig. ), “menhir" (long stone). the burial-place, called a “tumulus," is a great mound of neolithic stone period. fig. . fig. o. fig. . fig. . figs. to .-flint implements of the neolithic period (from danish arts.) historic ornament. fig. . fig. . fig. . figs. , , .-flint implements of the neolithic period. (from danish arts.) neolithic stone period. fig. . fig. . figs. , .–flint implements of the neolithic period. (from danish arts.) fig. . fig. . fig. . fig. . figs. to .- polished stone hammers and celts, neolithic period. (from danish arts.) vol. i. с fig. . fig. . fig. . fig. . figs. to .--pottery of the neolithic age. (from danish arts.) historic ornament. which they turned to good account by devoting some of it to their artistic culture; while the neolithic men were more fig. .—dolmen at hesbon (p. & c.). of a race of mechanics and farmers, who had neither time nor inclination for the cultivation of art, but were alto- be w!!!! the unite menu 他​用 ​www fig. . - giants’ tomb, sardinia (p. & c.). gether more scientific and mechanical than the men of the palæolithic period. chapter iv. the bronze age. the people of the bronze age introduced a higher civilisa- tion into the world than their predecessors of the stone ages. there appears to be a great overlap between the neolithic, bronze, and iron ages of central and northern europe, and the historic periods of the eastern countries bordering on the mediterranean. we have evidence that great periods of time must have marked the epochs of the prehistoric ages, and that the bronze age, like the stone and iron ages, began at different times in different coun- tries. the tribes who brought with them the age of bronze into europe composed the celtic van of the aryan race. the earliest productions of this period were the simple wedges resembling flat stone axes, the sides of which are slightly thickened to form ridges or flanges; the centres are also raised, which produces a ridge to prevent the head from going in too far in the handle; in some the flanges are much developed, and have also a loop cast on the side for the purpose of tying it on to the haft. some are made with a socket and loop; these have been called “paalstabs," and have a flat chisel-like shape (figs. , ). these earlier implements are often made of pure copper. bronze is a mixture of copper and tin, generally from two to four per cent. of tin, and is consequently harder than copper. knives, hammers, gouges, sickles, daggers, spears, swords, shields, many kinds of vessels, and articles of personal adornment made in bronze, belong to the earlier time of the bronze period, and similar articles were made fig. . fig. . fig. . fig. . fig. . fig. . fig. . figs. to .—bronze and paalstabs. (from danish arts.) figs. to .—bronze axes, paalstabs, and moulds. (from danish arts.) the bronze age. quill be to இப்பயாமாமா duruese fig. vuvi fig. . fig. . fig. . figs. to .-bronze swords and spear-head. (from danish arts.) + historic ornament. in this material in the prehistoric bronze ages all over the known world (figs. to ). an interesting object is a breast- plate, belonging to this early bronze period; it is decorated with zigzags in bands, and a well-ar- ranged scheme of spiralornamenta- tion (fig. ). urns of earthenware, sometimes decorated with zigzags and sacred signs, have been found in graves. these urns contained ashes of the dead (figs. , ). many of the bronze implements and other articles have been found in tombs, in caves in great quantities, both finished and un- figs. and . - bronze finished, in “kitchen middens," button for sword belt. or refuse heaps, in river-beds, and (from danish arts.) in bogs. some of the objects found in north germany, and par- i cor fig. .-breast-plate, with spiral ornaments. (from danish arts.) the bronze age. ticularly in denmark, sweden, and norway, are exceedingly beautiful in their shape and decoration. from nowhere else in the world come so many objects, and so much that is characteristic of the prehistoric bronze age. this period has been ably treated, and at great length, by mr. j. us vh fig. . fig. . fig. . figs. , , and .—urns of the bronze age (from danish arts.) j. a. worsaae, in his “danish arts,” and by mr. hans hildebrand, in his “arts of scandinavia," to which books we are indebted for the accompanying illustrations. historic ornament. it may be noticed that much of the decoration on these objects consists of a few simple elements with much geo- metric repetition. the varied forms are chiefly spirals interlocking at regulated distances, concentric rings, tri- fig. – bronze bowl found in sweden. (scand. arts.) angles, zigzag lines, and bands formed of lines which are reminiscences of the earlier withy lashings, with which the stone celts were fastened to their hafts. the raised, as well as the flat twisted - like bands, are derivatives from the twisted strings that would naturally be tied around como design mount the pottery of an early date to carry it by (fig. ). the spirals, zigzags, ring-crosses, wheels, tri- skeles, reciprocal mean- ders, semicircles, &c., are fig. .-urn of the stone age found in swedish dolmen. (scand. arts.) geometrical develop- ments of sun-snake, light- ning, the sun itself, cloud-forms, moon-forms, star-forms, and the sacred fylfot or swastika, all of which had their the bronze age. origin in egypt, india, central asia, or greece. at first they were used as isolated signs, or pictographs, to fig. .–bronze hatchet found in sweden. (scand. arts.) represent physical phenomena, that were objects of o + y ② * 아 ​us y a b С d e fig. .–sun signs. a, wheel cross or wheel; b, sun god signs; c, fylfot, or swastika; d, triskele; e, stars or sun signs. nature-worship with almost all the nations of the world s s s § s ss f g h i fig. .–sun signs. (from danish arts.) f, sun-snakes ; g, swastika; h, triskele; i, star or sun. n.b.—the swastika here is evidently a double sun-snake. after the dawn of civilisation, and when these signs migrated into the art of other nations or later peoples, historic ornament. “many or who were either ignorant of their meaning or understood them in an imperfect way, they ceased to be employed as isolated signs of the various divinities they originally represented, and were copied, and repeated, as required, to fill in a geometrical way the space at hand to be orna- mented. a beautiful piece of workmanship is the bronze horn (fig. ). worsaae thinks that this horn was used in the worship of the gods in the early bronze age, owing to the great number of sacred signs engraved on it. sun-wheels, sun-snakes, and sun-boats, developed into spiral orna- ment, may be seen on it. there is one ornament that plays an important part in the bronze and iron periods, of which much has been written, the “ fylfot” or “swastika.” it has been found in nearly every quarter of the ancient world, except egypt and assyria, both in savage ornament and in the art of cultured races. the “fylfot” or « full- footed” cross in anglo-saxon, it is also known by the names of "gammadion," “croix gammée," “croix cram- ponée," “ tetraskele," &c. the indian name for it is the “swastika” or “svastika,” which means “good luck," or “it is well.” the fylfot, according to the opinion of many archæologists, was originally the sign of the sun, and used as a sacred symbol in the worship of the sun ; others think it was a sign used to symbolize the rotatory motion of the planets; it is quite likely it has been used by different early peoples for both. it has been associated with other sun signs, as the circle, concentric circles, with the s-shaped sun-snakes, as on the prehistoric whorls from hissarlik, and very frequently with the solar divinities, as the horse, boar, ram, lion, ibex, and goose, &c. it is found on cyprian and rhodian pottery and on the "geometric pottery of greece. its appearance on many objects of early christian art can be accounted for. in these cases the christian missionaries permitted the continued use of it to their pagan converts, but they themselves attached a the bronze age. / anazim vma mm u alaaadadisa يې ۷۷۷۷۷۷۰/ in u ca). dance watate . * fig. .-bronze horn or trumpet, found at wismar, in mecklenburg. (from danish arts.) historic ornament. new meaning to it, regarding it as merely a substitute for the symbol of the cross. some writers have argued, with a good deal of plausi- bility, that the greek fret pattern, chinese and japanese frets, were only developments from the fylfot. this is purely conjectural, for as regards the greek fret, it is more likely that it had an egyptian source, as so many of onlalam dicate 鼎 ​cuin fig. .--pinak or plate, archaic period, from camiros, rhodes, showing fylfot, and sun signs, and sacred boar. (british museum.) the greek ornaments are but developments of egyptian and assyrian forms. the fret used by the greeks has been found in egypt in the ceiling ornament of tombs more than a thousand years before it appeared in greece. the chinese frets may have in some instances a fylfot origin, but at present this is doubtful, as it has not yet been proved. the drawing of the archaic greek plate (pinak), in the british museum, given at fig. , from the greek colony of rhodes, is very interesting, as it shows a well- the bronze age. developed fylfot between the legs of the boar, and an early greek fret band; the fret here may only be a water-sign, or a river-edge representation. the spaces around the boar (animal sacred to the sun) are filled up with sun-signs and star-signs; even the large segment of radiating lines, and the form over the animal's back may typify the sun. the whole decoration has a high religious meaning in fig. .- silver brooch, plated with gold, in the form of a double sun-sriake or swastika ; found in iceland. (danish arts.) reference to sun-worship, and is evidently a copy by a greek artist of an oriental embroidery motive. the fylfot has been found stamped on the pottery of the lake dwellings of the zuni, yucatan, and other american pottery, and on objects from iceland, ireland, and scandi- navia. a circular form of it is seen on the gold scandi- navian ornament (fig. ). whether it originally was a pure sun-sign, or whether it signified the axial rotation of the earth round the north historic ornament. pole, it is full of remarkable interest, and enters more than any other symbolic sign into historic ornament generally. in india, china, and japan, it has been much fig. .-gold bowl, with bronze handle and sacred horse's head. (danish arts.) fig. .--bronze horn found in denmark. (danish arts.) used; this was owing to the spread of the buddhist religion in these countries. it is found on the toes of the “foot- print” of buddha, at the amaravati tope, india; and owing to its great religious significance in china, japan, the bronze age. . hoid fig. .—danish bronze knives, decorated with sun-ships and other sacred figures. (danish arts.) i fig. . fig. . fig. .-collar of bronze found in sweden. (scand. arts.) figs. and .-bronze and gold buttons found in women's graves, with the triskele, moon-signs, and sun snakes. (danish arts.) vol. i. d historic ornament. and ceylon, we find it stamped on the account books, coins and dresses of both the living and the dead, as a universal sign of good luck. the swastika, both straight and curved-armed variety, was used indiscriminately in the decoration of objects of the iron age, whether in bronze, iron, gold, silver, wood, or stone. it was the sign among the romans of jupiter tonans, who wielded the thunder and lightning ; was the sign used for thor, the god of thunder and lightning, with the early german peoples, and the curved variety of it was used as a symbol of their highest divinity by the northern nations of scandinavia. from this widespread use of the swastika it is conjectured that it is an aryan symbol, brought by the people of the bronze age from their primi- tive home in the plateau of central asia. chapter v. the iron age. the age of iron, like the bronze ages, varies very much in point of time in europe as compared with asia, and also there is a great overlapping between the times of the iron age in the northern, middle, and southern parts of europe. it is safe to say that the early part of this age belongs to prehistoric times as far as central and northern europe is concerned, and although the grecian archi- pelago and western asia were in a high state of civilised culture five or six centuries before the christian era, and were acquainted with the use of iron, it is clear that the extensive employment and decoration of iron implements and arms were chiefly in switzerland, northern italy, and in the valley of the danube. this iron culture soon spread over to gaul and spain, and to the british islands in the west, and scandinavia in the north. the romans, under their first emperors, imported their swords and other arms from spain and the west on account of their good workmanship. from the many “finds” that have been brought to light in the above countries it is evident that, for five or six centuries before the commencement of the christian era, there was a great activity going on in the manufacture of iron objects in these countries, principally swords and other warlike arms. the two most important “finds" are the “halstaat” in austria, and the la têne "finds” near marin, lake neuchâtel. the halstaat find was composed of many gold and bronze articles, pottery, and a few iron weapons. the place where these things historic ornament. were found was a celtic tomb, and the iron articles found in it are among the earliest known in europe, which proves them to have been made at the transition period from the bronze to the iron ages. besides the purely geometric work the decoration on these articles consists of sun and moon signs, wheel crosses, half moons, the sacred ship, the swastika, triskele, &c.; crude representations of men and animals, as horses, oxen, stags, he-goats, and geese, all of which have a religious and symbolic meaning. all these forms were used in the bronze and iron ages alike. the find at la têne, near marin, lake neuchâtel, belongs to a later period and is more important from an art point of view, for besides the usual sacred decorations engraved on the objects, some of the sword handles and sheaths are beautifully sculptured or chiselled in iron, with well- designed ornament and animal forms. (see fig. , d, of gaulish or late celtic workmanship.) the shapes and materials of the weapons found at la têne, or of what is called the “la têne period,” do not bear much resemblance to the weapons of the bronze age, and the sheaths of the swords and daggers are sometimes bronze and sometimes iron, but the blades are of iron. communication with the etruscans and the greeks by the people of central europe is proved by the coins, vases, and objects of personal ornament, and by the imitations of greek and macedonian coins found in great quantities in middle and western europe and in britain, that belong to this late celtic period. this accounts for the more "advanced” nature of the decoration on the marin swords and daggers of the “ la têne period,” and this particular culture-wave brought with it the beginnings of that orna- ment which, in later centuries, developed into the peculiar celtic and runic twistings and interlacings that are so common to danish, norwegian, swedish, anglo-saxon and irish phases of decorative art, that was practised so largely from the first to the twelfth centuries of our era. this celtic interlacing, though often more distressing than the iron age. a chinese puzzle, and in some instances barbarous in the extreme, yet is often very interesting and beautiful in exe- cution. most of it can be traced to its origin in sacred signs and animal forms in classical ornament. it will be interesting to trace briefly some of these deve- lopments of the northern runic and celtic art of the iron age. in the development of nearly all historic art, we find that the religious aspirations of man were the chief factors. in egypt, asia, europe, or america, wherever art had an individuality, the greatest monuments were erected, and the finest works of art were created for the honour of the nation's gods. we have seen how the forms of ornament were generally derived from the figurative signs of sacred animals, plants, and other mystic symbols of a religious meaning, and were in the end converted in meaningless but æsthetic ornament. this is the history of nine-tenths of historic ornament that has survived the decay of nations. the ancient religion and beliefs of the pre-christian peoples were those which they had brought with them when they first migrated from their asiatic home, namely, the worship of the sun, moon, and lightning. cæsar mentions in his “de bello gallico," vi., , that the “ germani people worshipped the visible helping gods, the sun, moon, and fire, and knew nothing whatever of other divinities.” the symbolic signs and animal forms sacred to these phenomena, already mentioned, are found more or less on the utensils and weapons of the gallic- german peoples of the iron age, and in addition to these we see the representation of the northern gods, the trinity of the north, thor, odin and frey, with and without the sacred animals peculiar to each. in the earlier times close intercourse with the romans brought about a high degree of culture to the barbarian people of the rhine valley and more northern places; many statuettes of bronze inlaid with gold and silver, representing roman gods, have been dug up in denmark and other places in the north. these statuettes were transformations of the roman and the iron age. riveted on the ornament or brooch itself, remind us of the sun-god frey." the figs. and ı are metal mountings decorated with the triskele formed of sun-snakes, the swastika with straight arms, and the compound variety of the fylfot on the larger mounting. these illustrate a tran- sition of the sacred sun form to more purely ornamental designs. the imitation of roman coins and medallions of the time of constantine to ornaments that have been called “ bracteates was extensively carried on by the germanic people. these bracteates have the design on one side only, with a loop or ring at the top to suspend them 正 ​ . fig. . fig. . figs. and .-metal mountings from thorsberg. (danish arts.) around the neck as an amulet. these golden bracteates have been found in great numbers in scandinavia and denmark, and scarcely anywhere else, which proves they were indigenous to these countries. it is interesting to notice how they have been trans- formed from their roman and byzantine originals to purely sacred celtic amulets of a new national type of orna- ment. fig. , from hildebrand's “scandinavian arts," is a barbaric copy of a roman medallion. it is a poor attempt to copy the imperial head, and the inscription is badly and meaninglessly copied. on the reverse is a figure of victory, with signs of the cross, surrounded by a wreath and legend. historic ornament. boczci drosted . it appears that after the age of the constantines, the intercourse of the germanic people with the romans was Ιζζ ΣΟ ggio cocht a ДПІ wullin ar fig. .-barbarian copy of a roman medallion fo ind in sweden. (scand. arts.) broken, owing to the invasion of the huns, and for a long time afterwards they were left to themselves without es qliqli fig. .—golden bracteate from scandinavia. (danish arts.) foreign influence, and were enabled to develop their national art on the foundation of roman culture, at the same time substituting their own emblems of their national the iron age. gods in place of the classic ones in their decorative work. we can safely gather from this that the hunnic invasion of the roman empire was the indirect means of giving to northern europe a distinct national style of art. the illustrations of the golden bracteates here given (figs. , ) partly show how this development began. on fig. is thor's head with his tiara or helmet, the he- ousse ood gerala fig. .—golden bracteate from scandinavia. (danish arts.) goat sacred to thor, the triad three dots, and the swastika. on the border is the triskele (odin's sign), frey's cross, and the zigzag or lightning. the larger bracteate (fig. ) has thor with the he- goat surrounded by the swastika, triskele, and the cross (four suns forming the cross), the signs for thor, odin, and frey. the inner border has the three dots, or triad; next border, thor's head; and the outer border is composed of historic orn'ament. , estir not : fig. .—parts of harness in gilt bronze, gotland. (scand. arts.) he-goats. on the loop are signs of the sun and moon, and under it sun-snakes (developed into spirals). the above the iron age. descriptions of the bracteates are chiefly taken from the “ danish arts." characteristic ornament of this period is shown at fig. , which are parts of a harness in gilt bronze from a tomb in a fig. .–fibula in gilt bronze, gotland. (scand. arts.) fig. .-fibula in gilt bronze, gotland. (scand. arts.) ) o gotland; the patterns are composed of corrupted animal and bird forms. figs. to are fibula decorations of the interlacing animal forms, which are characteristic of the more attenu- ated and later development of scandinavian art. the series of designs, figs. to , are of great interest in showing the de- velopment of patterns from fig. .–part of rim of fig. . lion forms to the twisted snake ornament. the figures are taken from hilde- brand's “scandinavian arts." according to that author, fig. is a scandinavian copy or adaptation of a roman design, which consists of two lions couchant. the other patterns (figs. to ) are further developments of corrupted lion forms. it is quite possible that the peculiar historic ornament. interlacings of scandinavian ornament may have been the result of imperfect copying of lion and bird forms. they fig. . fig . figs. and .-- corrupted figures of lions. (scand. arts.) fig. . fig . fig. . figs. , , .—animal ornamental patterns, corrupted figures of lions. (scand. arts.) were never intended for snake forms, as many of these have legs and feet, and serpents and snakes were unknown in the north. many stranger derivatives of ornament have the iron age. coo fig. .- silver goblet, with gold-plated decoration, found in zeeland. (danish arts.) fig. .- under side of a fibula. (scand. arts.) historic ornament. existed in the ornament of savage tribes.* when the gotlandic artist had reduced his lion forms to snakes he fig. .–pottery of the iron age. (danish arts.) kur mi alu fig. .-piece of woollen cloth with gold and silver threads, viking period. (danish arts.) carried his work to the verge of monotony with inter- minable interlacings. the decoration on the goblet (fig. ) is the sun god see haddon's “evolution of ornamental art," . the iron age. frey, with his horse and geese; the masks are intended for those of thor; his he-goat and sun signs are also seen. this goblet was evidently used in the sun-worship festivals. a restrained and agreeable design is seen on the under side of a fibula (fig. ); a well-shaped earthen pot is decorated with zigzag work, and has the symbolical triad mark impressed on it (fig. ); and a remnant of woollen cloth, woven with silver and gold threads, has the swastika and the hammer of thor as decoration. this was found in a grave at randers of the tenth century. it belongs to the viking period of the iron age (fig. ). chapter vi. the lake dwellings of switzerland and other parts of europe. in switzerland and in upper italy evidences have been found of numerous lake dwellings, and in ireland and scotland analogous dwellings on islands in lakes and morasses have been found, to which the name of cran- noges” (“wooden islands ") has been given. the exact age of these dwellings has not been accurately defined, but an approximate date has been assigned to them. from the nature, kind, and decoration of the numerous articles that have been dug up from the foundation relic beds in the lakes of switzerland, it appears that the duration of the “lake dwellings” period was from about the time of the later stone age to the early iron age; it therefore em- braces portions of the stone age, the bronze age, and early iron ages of europe. the lake dwellings were erected by certain tribes of the early inhabitants of europe, for the better security of themselves and their property from the savage animals of the mainland, and from their enemies, the still more savage fellow-men. as far as can be made out from the remains found in the lakes, the lake dwellers were more civilised and less warlike than their neighbours that lived on land. the lake dwellings are the most ancient evi- dences of man's first constructive capabilities in the art of building. herodotus tells us of a settlement on lake prasias (tachyus), in rumelia, where “men live on plat- forms supported by tall, piles.” some tribes of the lake dwellings. papuans of new guinea still live on pile dwellings. the lacustrine habitation (fig. ), from “les races sau- vages,” by m. bertillon, is a representation of a pile dwelling on the i.ake mohrya, in central africa, of the present day. the substructures, fig. , a, b, and c, taken from atbadia dietriche .- lacustrine habitation in lake mohrya, central africa. (from les races sauvages, by m. bertillon.) keller's “lake dwellings," will give general ideas of the foundations of the dwellings in switzerland and upper italy. at a is seen the earliest type, which reveals the section of the piles, upper flooring, water-line, and sloping bank of the lake. the piles were sometimes composed of split trees or stems, but more often of stems with the bark on, and were of various kinds of wood ; they were vol. i. e jo historic ornament. sharpened at the end by stone hatchets, and in later times by bronze or iron axes, and were driven into the sand or mud at a short distance from the shore. the heads of the b С e monfoot peat feet nento nes floolit allshlles g f hree blea alshe's lake tsainak fig. .–section and plans, lake dwelling substructures from keller. a, general idea of arrangement of piles; b, shows the piles driven into the mud, with stones thrown between them; c, section of fascine dwelling; d, diagram of floor fascine construction from niederwyl; e, section of irish crannoge in ardakiilin lough; f, con- struction of wooden form (niederwyl); g, section of lake dwelling beds at roben- hausen. piles were brought to a level, and planks or whole trees were fastened on them as beams; sometimes they were fastened on by wooden pins, and sometimes were “notched" into the heads of the piles. cross-beams lake dwellings. were often forced in between the uprights under the plat- form to steady the structure, and outside there was often fastened a clothing of wattle-work to act as a fender from various accidents. if it were found difficult to drive the piles into the bed of the lake to any great depth, artificial raising of the bottom was resorted to, by bringing cargoes of stones in boats and dropping them between the piles, thereby securing a perfectly secure substructure (fig. , b). these artificial risings are called "stein-bergs.” another and later variety of substructure is known as “fascine-work” (fig. , c). probably this fascine con- struction was the safest when the water of the lake rose in height. it consisted of layers of small trees or stems laid lengthwise, built from the bottom of the lake; these sticks or trees were interwoven, and at intervals upright piles were driven in to keep them in position, and on the top of this structure, above high-water mark, the flooring platform was laid. the “crannoges or “wooden islands," of ireland and scotland, resemble very much the swiss fascine dwellings. the irish “crannoges were often placed on natural islands, or on shallows or loughs, but sometimes were built up, like those in switzerland, from the bottom of the lake. these “crannoges” were used as chieftains' fast- nesses or places of retreat. they were built chiefly in the stone age, and were used long after the age of iron. at fig. , e, may be seen a section of an irish "crannoge” in ardakillin lough. at fig. , f and d, are shown diagrams of platform and floor construction respectively of a lake dwelling at niederwyl, switzerland. on the top of this floor a plaster made of mud, loam, and gravel, was laid and beaten firmly down. as far as can be ascertained from the remains of upright corner posts that have been found in position, the houses were rectangular, though some may have been round like the huts of the contem- porary people on the mainland. the walls of the houses are supposed to have been built of wattle-work plastered historic ornament. over with mud and thatched, as evidences of this are seen in the large pieces of burnt clay with wattle impression on it that have been found ; this also points out the fact of the houses or settlements being burnt down. in some cases the walls were of fascine construction. every hut was pro- vided with its hearth, which consisted of three or four large flat stones. clay weights used for the loom have been mw e und titt mont w*... fig. .-an ideal lake settlement or town. (from keller's lake dwellings.) found in great quantities, which proves, together with many fragments of flax cloth and woven “ bast” which have come to light, that weaving was known and practised by the lake dwellers (fig. , k). pottery has been found in the relic beds, but is usually of a very coarse descrip- tion. many broken bits of pottery have been found orna- . mented with lines, chevrons, or zigzags, and often with the “rope" ornament, raised or impressed by a twisted string or rope; this kind of decoration is evidently sug- lake dwellings. gested by the band of string tied around the primitive vessels of clay to keep them together, or for carrying pur- poses. see fig. , b, f, g, h, i, and j. b А с d $ e cocco iiii f fig. .-objects from the lake dwellings (from keller). a, bronze knife (lake of bienne); b, ornamented pottery; c, moon image of earthenware; d, part of an iron sword (gaulisb work); e, moon image of bronze; f, g, h, i, j, earthenware vessels; k, embroidered cloth. the builders of the lake dwellings are supposed to have been a branch of the celtic population of switzerland, belonging to prehistoric times, and was in its last stage of decadence before the celts took their place in the history historic ornament. of europe. although many remains of bronze and iron implements have been brought to light from the relic beds of the lake dwellings, this does not prove that the inhabitants were acquainted with their manufacture, for most of the articles were probably obtained by barter from the people of the mainland. a beautiful bronze knife is seen at fig. , a, found in the lake of bienne, and part of a sword in iron, of gaulish, or “late celtic” workmanship, from marin, lake neu- châtel (fig. , d). highly interesting are the “moon-stones” and “moon- images” of this period, made in stone, earthenware, and bronze. these crescent moon-images have a religious sig- nificance, and have doubtless been used to decorate the tops of their entrance doors (keller) or other conspicuous places in their dwellings, as emblematic images of their worship of the moon. the figure at c represents an earthenware moon-image with a flat base for standing purposes. the decoration on this is peculiarly interesting, as showing one of the earliest fascine patterns, doubtless derived from the floor construc- tion of the dwellings, or from the lashings of withy bands used to fasten the stone axes and celts to their hafts. this kind of ornament has been used very much in the bronze age weapons, implements, and other objects. the moon- image at e is made of bronze, with a handle and a ring to hang it by. it was probably worn as an amulet or decora- tion suspended from the neck of a celtic priest. remains of many kinds of plants, seeds, corn, and fruit have been found, usually in coarse earthen pots; also cakes and loaves of bread, and mill-stone "crushers” for grinding corn. domestic animals, such as cows, goats, and dogs, were kept by the lake dwellers. fishing and fish-curing, as may be easily inferred, was an important industry with these interesting people. chapter vii. egyptian art. according to their most ancient traditions, the egyptian race descended from a point high up on the nile, or the land of ethiopia, but modern science proves them to belong to a caucasian race, and not of the negro type. the name egypt has been derived from “het-ka-ptah,” one of the titles of the city of memphis, which means “the temple of the genius of ptah,” and has been interpreted by the greeks as “aiguptos,” the latter being the old name for the nile. on the south of egypt dwelt the nubians or ethiopians ; on the west the libyans, a fair-skinned race, who, being a warlike people, were employed by the egyptians as mer- cenary troops; and on the north-east the nomadic semitic tribes of edom and southern syria. the latter people often wandered west to feed their flocks in the delta of lower egypt, and in course of time formed, with the phænician traders, a large proportion of the population of the lower kingdom of egypt. it was on the north-east frontier, on the isthmus of suez, that egypt had most to fear from her foreign enemies. nearly all the art of the various peoples and nations of the world was developed in relation to their religion, and most of it-as elsewhere stated-originated in symbolic signs that represented, under various forms, human or otherwise, the original objects or phenomena which they worshipped. this was the case especially so in egypt; , an rompt fig. .-isis nursing her son, horus. (p. & c.) height, ins. egyptian art. and this must be our plea to describe here briefly the principal outlines of the egyptian religion. the religion of the egyptians had two developments, one tending towards monotheism, and the other to poly- theism. they believed in one god, who was the king of all gods; and, on the other hand, they had their mythical gods, who personified whatever was permanent in natural phenomena, such as the sun, moon, sky, stars, earth, light, darkness, floods, the seasons, the year, and the hours. the goddess nut represented the sky, and was known also under the names of neith, isis, hathor, sekhet, &c., which were the names of the sky at sunrise or sunset (fig. ). the sun had names without number, as rā, horus, ptah, tmu, setek, amen, &c. (figs. , ). osiris and sekru are names of the sun after he has set, or is “dead and buried” (fig. ). osiris is king of the dead, and, in mythological language, he is slain by his brother set, who personified night, who in his turn is slain by horus (fig. ), who is the heir of osiris. horus signifies the “one above," and amen-rā, the great king of all the gods, signifies “the one who hides himself.” the great amen-rā was the mightiest god in all the egyptian pantheon. he was the great god of thebes. the gods were represented in human shape, and also in animal form. the animals, or animal combinations, were simply symbolical of the gods on account of certain attributes common to each, or in some cases because they bore the same name. the egyptians were intense believers in a future state, hence the great care bestowed on their dead, for they believed that the body should be preserved in order to insure a state of bliss for the soul in the future world. every human being had its "double," or ghost “ka," as well as its ghost “ba," which we often find represented under the form of a human being with a hawk's head. sometimes the image of a man was buried with him. this was to represent his “double," and is, therefore, called a adyan onin sel fig. .--amen, or ammon, bronze. (p. & c.) fig. .-ptah, from a bronze actual size. (p. & c.) egyptian art. “ka” statue, or image. the “ba,” or soul, was sup- posed to be “luminous." it is supposed that many of the animals and animal forms buried with and painted on the coffins of the egyptian dead were, in remote times, the sacred animals or “totems” belonging to the dead man's family. “ totem worship" may have been the most ancient form of the egyptian religion. the temple of bubastis (in the delta) was sacred to the goddess bast, or pasht, the cat-headed goddess (fig. ). the cat was, therefore, a sacred animal or a “totem,” in ancient egypt, like the ibis, hawk, asp, beetle, &c., totems; and so in the district or town of bubastis the cat clan, or worshippers of the cat-headed goddess pasht, built the rock-cut temple called speos artemidos, near beni-hasan, and dedicated it to her worship. the writing of the egyptians is classified under three heads : the “ hieroglyphic," or the form in which it appears on the monuments; the “hieratic,” or priestly writing, as used on the papyrus documents; and the “demotic,” a cursive or running kind of writing similar to the hieratic, and a later development of it. in the year the famous “rosetta stone," now in the british museum, was found near the rosetta mouth of the nile by a french officer. it passed into the hands of the british in . on this stone is inscribed a decree of the priests of memphis con- ferring divine honours on ptolemy v., king of egypt, b.c. the inscription is in three forms, the hiero- glyphic, the demotic, and in greek characters. from this inscription was first obtained the key to the decipherment of the hieroglyphics, and interpretation of the ancient lan- guage of egypt, and the names of the kings which in the hieroglyphics are enclosed in cartouches or oblong rings. thus the clue was obtained to the identification of the letters of the egyptian alphabet, which had hitherto baffled all the attempts of egyptologists to find out. the credit of the identification is chiefly due to the french bo historic ornament. jest be bao ft homes fig. .— the goddess bast, or pasht. actual size. (p. & c.) fig. .-osiris. (p. & c.) egyptian art. savant, champollion, but a considerable share of the honour must be given to thomas young, who was the first to find out the correct value of many of the phonetic signs. the egyptians, from the earliest period known, were acquainted with and skilled in medicine, in astronomy, in mathematics, philosophy, poetry, and fiction. the oldest literary papyrus at present known dates from the third to the fifth dynasties ( to b.c.). egyptian art was at its best in the earliest dynasties. the fourth dynasty was the great pyramid-building period, and the statues of this great epoch were more natural and artistic, and altogether were less conventional than those of later times. it is notable that in the eighteenth and twenty-sixth dynasties, after a long period of art depression, the artists went back for inspiration and better models to the work of the men of the fourth and twelfth dynasties. the history of egypt can be traced back from , years before the christian era, and is divided into thirty dynasties, whose succession was the result of failure in any of the original lines of marriage, or marriage with a female of lower rank, or of a revolution. the thirty dynasties are divided into three groups dynasties .-xi. (b.c. — ) xi.-xix. (b.c. -- ) xx.-xxx. (b.c. – ) the ancient empire. the middle empire. the new empire. these dates and arrangements are formulated chiefly on the basis of a work written in greek, and compiled by manetho, an egyptian priest who lived in the third century b.c. the kings of egypt have been named pharaohs from the title “ peraa' great house.” the seat or centre of the government shifted its position according to dynastic reasons, or from policy. during the ancient empire it was first at memphis, and then moved to abydos and other places in the south as the empire extended. when historic ornament. egypt was in the height of its glory the centre of govern- ment was chiefly at thebes, but moving often according to revolution or foreign oppression. rameses and his near successors held their court at the northern city of san, or tanis. the time of the new empire was chiefly a period of foreign rule and slow decadence, the seat of the aధం పరమపదపదవడ it conue fig. .-the great pyramid of kheops, and small pyramids; from perring. (p. & c.) empire shifted to nearly all the former places or capitals and to bubastis or sais with each political change. menes was the first historical king of egypt, and was supposed to have founded memphis, where the worship of the god ptah, “creator of gods and men,” was first instituted, as well as that of apis or hapi, the sacred bull—the serapis of the greeks. for the next six hun- dred years we know scarcely anything of egyptian history except the names of the kings, until we come to the great period of the fourth dynasty (b.c. - ), egyptian art. seneferu was the founder of this dynasty. he conquered the peninsula of sinai, and worked the valuable mines of copper and turquoise found in that country. his son and successor, khufu, better known as kheops (b.c. - ), was the builder of the great pyramid at gizeh (fig. ), which he erected for his tomb. the king kha-f-rā (kephren) (b.c. - ), built the second pyramid, and his son, men-kau-rā (mykerinos) was the builder of the third pyramid. men-kau-rā was huuhniitäkin podood cc toom lo sto fig. .--section through the great pyramid of kheops. (p. & c.) a wise and humane sovereign, and it is recorded to his honour, as an exceptional qualification, that “he did not oppress his people." in this he was different to most of the pharaohs. his mummified remains are now in the british museum. the sphinx, or man-headed lion, carved out of the solid rock, is near the great pyramid, and is supposed to be the work of a much earlier period (fig. ). the fifth dynasty (b.c. - ) is not an important one as far as art is concerned. the sixth (b.c. - ) was noted for the erection of historic ornament. its pyramid tombs and for the religious texts that were inscribed on their interior walls. le ri: .---the stepped pyramid. (p. & c.) supposed to be the most ancient building in egypt. i'rom the seventh to the eleventh dynasty (b.c. - ) is a period whose history is almost lost. it meant fig. .—the southern pyramid of dashcur. (p. & c., to the egyptians a period of more than six hundred years of tribal jealousies and fighting, at the end of which egypt . egyptian art. was consolidated from north to south, and a powerful dynasty succeeded these internal struggles. the twelſth dynasty was a brilliant one for the arts, and for great works of engineering skill. the names of the pharaohs of this dynasty, amenemhāt and usertsen, are among the most renowned in egyptian history. great temples were restored or newly built at thebes, heliopolis, tanis, and fig. .–the great sphinx. (p. & c.) abydos. the great artificial lake, mauur (moeris of the greeks), or “great water," was constructed to receive the surplus waters of the nile, and to control its floods. the arabs call this lake “el-fayyum,” from another of its egyptian names “phiom,” the sea. it was completed in the reign of amenemhāt iii. (b.c. - ). the same king built the celebrated labyrinth, the “erpa-re-hent," or “temple at the entrance of the lake,” in which the king himself was interred. his successor was the last king of the twelfth dynasty. the thirteenth and four- vol. i. f historic ornament. eshoes fig. .-colossi of amenophis iii. statues of memnon at thebes. (p. & c.) egyptian art. ! : teenth dynasties are dark periods in which the invasion of the elamites and the nomad tribes from syria and western oll asia took place. the fifteenth and six- teenth dynasties are the “hyksos” dynas- ties. the hyksos, or shepherd kings, were la the chief of the above nomad asiatic tribes, and consequently uni usurpers of the native rule. a revolt took place in the reign of one of these kings of the seventeenth dy- nasty, and under amāsis i., the founder of the eighteenth dynasty, the shepherd kings were finally driven out of egypt. about the end of the. hyksos rule the patriarch joseph was sold into egypt. king nubti (b.c. ) is supposed to have been the pharaoh of that time, and the hyksos king, apepa ii., is supposed to have been fig. :----amenophis iii. presenting an offering to amen. (p. & c.) the king that raised joseph to power. the explorer, m. jacques de mor- gan, expresses the opinion that the shepherd kings = {}}} historic ornament. were the tomb-robbers, who, either from cupidity, or a wish to annihilate the last traces of a conquered race, pillaged every pyramid of its dead, and the treasures there concealed, for not a single pyramid has been found unviolated that was built before the hyksos dynasty. thothmes iii. (b.c. ) was a powerful and warlike king who compelled assyria to pay him tribute. in the eight- eenth dynasty, egypt was more powerful than at any other period of her history. the great temples of thebes, karnak, and luxor were built during this dynasty. a later monarch of this dynasty, amenophis iii., erected on the west of the nile at thebes two colossal statues of himself, that the greeks haye named the statues of memnon, the fabled king of egypt that was supposed to have been slain in the trojan wars (fig. ). another king of this dynasty, amenophis iv., made himself exceedingly notorious by trying to introduce a new religion, and for this he had his memory execrated, and was deeply cursed as a heretic by priests and people of the succeeding generations. it appears he had imbibed from his mother, ti, who was an assyrian princess, certain religious opinions which he determined to force on his own people. in order to do this he removed his capital from thebes, where the national worship of the great god amen was celebrated, to khu-en-aten, the modern tell-el- amarna, which name he took for himself, and which means the “ splendour of the sun-disk"; there he set up the sun- disk god, aten (the radiant sun). the new religion, how- ever, was obnoxious to the conservative egyptians, and soon died out (fig. ). the nineteenth dynasty (b.c. - ) was founded by rameses i. he was a successful king, but his son seti (fig. ) was a greater one, and had the reputation of being a great builder. it was he who built the great “hall of columns," at karnak, which joins the pylon of amen- ophis iii. (fig. ). he also built the temple at kůrnah, and remains of his egyptian art. work is seen at abydos, memphis, and heliopolis. he was succeeded by his famous son rameses ii., the sesostris of the greeks, the supposed oppressor of the israelites. he was a very powerful monarch, and, from all accounts, . • : dec tin cial? diid coleiro go tod d d.co ! im acolo fig. .—the adoration of the solar-disk by amenophis iv. (p.) didieu a apen داد ایا:۱۰۱/۰ solo in order to glorify himself in the eyes of posterity, did not scruple to erase the names of former kings from off their cartouches on their monuments and inscribe his own in their place. that he has accomplished the end he had in historic ornament. view by so doing there is not the slightest doubt, for no monarch of egypt is better known than he. but apart ամայելակյլից: ուալ fig. ;. - seti with attributes of osiris between amen and chuoum. (p. & c.) from this he was certainly a mighty chieftain, who “en- riched the land with memorials of his name.” the greatest of his many battles (he was always fight- ing) was fought with the khita (hittites), under the walls egyptian art. of kadesh, in the valley of the orontes. his forces were auchergwain fig. .-entrance to the hypostyle hall of the temple of amen at karnak. (m.) almost defeated when by his personal valour he turned the tide of the battle and entirely routed the khita (fig. ). the most famous building of his time is the rock-hewn historic ornament. temple, the “great temple,” that he built and dedicated to amen, ptah, and harmachis, which faces the nile at ipsamboul, in nubia. on the façade of this temple are sculptured in situ four seated colossal figures of rameses, two on each side of the doorway. from the soles of the feet to the top of fig. .-- the rout of the khita ; egyptians to the left, the khita to the right. (m.) the pschent on the head measures sixty-five feet; they are the largest statues in egypt, and the workmanship is careful in finish. over the entrance is carved in relief on the rock a colossal figure of the god rā, and on either side of it are single figures in low-relief of rameses in the act of adoration (fig. ). egyptian art. menephthah (b.c. — ) was the successor of rameses ii. and his successor was seti ii. the latter fig. .–façade of the great rock-cut temple at ipsamboul. was the last king of the middle empire. with the com- mencement of the twentieth dynasty the new empire egyptian art. of the delta, afterwards capturing memphis and thebes, which he pillaged. the assyrian king died suddenly, and taharka, a native usurper, succeeded in driving out the assyrians, but soon after egypt was again conquered by relme cajter ruh fel sce fig. .-- portrait of rameses ii. (louvre; p. & c.) ashurbanipal, a powerful assyrian king (b.c. ). the assyrians, however, after a short time of occupation with- drew from egypt, owing to their troubles at home with the medes, who were laying siege to nineveh, and egypt historic ornament. again revived. under amāsis the country enjoyed peace for about forty years (b.c. — ). the egyptians pos- sessed a fleet at this time with which they advanced to the phoenician coast and took the city of sidon, and also annexed the island of cyprus to egyptian rule. egypt submitted to the persian army under cambyses in b.c. , and was for more than one hundred years aſter- wards a mere vassal of persia. the twenty-seventh dynasty (b.c. — ) was composed solely of persian kings. a successful revolt broke out in the last persian king's reign, darius ii., when egypt was free once more. fig. .—the egyptian “ gorge." amenrut was the only king of the twenty-eighth dynasty, and after the twenty-ninth and thirtieth dynasties were ended, the latter, by the conquest of egypt once more by the persians under artaxerxes iii. (b.c. ), we find the country under persian rule for the space of eight years. about this time the persian monarch was defeated by alexander the great, which brought egypt under the greek rule. at the death of alexander egypt was governed by the macedonian kings, the ptolemies, from to b.c. after the roman wars and the death of cleopatra, egypt found itself a roman province. in a.d. the arabs under omar conquered the country, egyptian art. and it was ruled by them till , when it passed into the hands of the turks. the pyramids of egypt have doubtless derived their sunggu takda rear ruube mustava bestfa | toto பாபா ch . etijnt fichovirala nr. vitrin! blo!!!!kleinas jt fins i teresults mo ndatetoont poco fig. .--general appearance of an egyptian temple. opa edasie amuel etorrikalandu pendiendo dan cuetes that itt shape from the prehistoric grave mounds. although elabo- rately and ingeniously contrived for the concealment of the remains of the kings, and are stupendous monuments of building skill, they are not examples of architecture in the true sense of the word. perhaps the earliest examples historic ornament. of egyptian architecture, properly speaking, are seen in the ancient shrines, with sloping walls and flat roof, and hav- ing the peculiar cavetto cornice moulding called the tula hour bimharibas san ini fig. .-square building egyptian “gorge” (figs. and ). horizontality is the great feature of egyptian architecture, which is typi- cally expressed by the illustration fig. , an ideal generalisation of an egyptian temple. as hardly any, or no, rain falls in most parts of egypt, gb here tu croid pte lt holihitil) i. * fut tutti jitutiltintilor tenido titom i duo : وام .ހޮޅު=.ދ. = fig. .--oblong building. a sloping roof was not a necessity. the external walls in the case of a square building are in the form of a trape- zium, making the whole edifice of the shape of a truncated pyramid, and pyramid-like in either the square or rectan- gular-planned buildings (figs. and ), except when egyptian art. the end walls are vertical (fig. ), then it tends toward the ridge-form. in regard to the scarcity of voids and narrow slop- ing doorways, the similarity in egyptian buildings of every kind is very striking (fig. ). this absence of voids gives a dark and gloomy character to the buildings, when compared with the architecture of other countries. the horizontal element and solidity of construction impart a look of powerful strength and of deep repose to the egyp- tian temple. even the tall and slender obelisks placed in front of the mighty pylons have little, if any, effect in le fig. .-model of an egyptian house. (p. & c.) removing the horizontal appearance of the whole building we give the ground plan, perspective view, and front elevation of the great temple of luxor, as a typical illus- tration of an egyptian temple from restorations by chipiez (figs. , , and ). its construction is described by champollion as the “ architecture of giants." this double-temple was the work of two kings. from the second pylon to the further end of the temple is the portion built first, by the king amenophis iii. the other portion, from first to the second pylon, is the part built by ha:::| historic ornament. : ] rameses ii. the sanctuary is placed in the centre of a hall, surrounded by small chambers. it has two doors, one at either end, and on the axis of the building it has a vestibule in front and a hall beyond, supported by twelve columns. another hall in front of the naos (or interior apartment) is sup- ported by thirty-two lofty columns. in front of this again is a large square open court. this court is con- nected to the larger front peristylar court by a grand and lofty gallery, similar to a hypostyle hall. it is ft. long, enclosed and covered, and richly deco- rated like the hypostyle hall at karuak (fig. ). four colossal seated statues are in front of the first pylon, and two obelisks, one on each side of the door-way. four large flagstaffs and a double row of sphinxes in front of the temple complete the accessories to this great edifice. the whole building and obelisks were covered over with bas-reliefs and inscriptions. the typical egyptian columns or supports are of jo toll fig. .—plan of the temple of luxor. (p. & c.) voi.. i. g et du di asmitters . trinn lutura hiniha tails داود fig. .— bird's-eye view of luxor, as restored hy chipiez. (p. & c.) me ill cc fig. . - principal façade of the temple of luxor, restored by chipiez. (p. & c.) ccc fig. .—column of thothmes iii. ; from the ambulatory of thothmes at karnak. (p. & c.) historic ornament. two distinct and well-marked kinds, the lotus-headed and the campaniform or bell-shaped. the former is so called from its resemblance to a closed lotus-bud (fig. ), and the latter from its re- semblance to a bell with the mouth uppermost (fig. ). an earlier and simpler form of column or support is the quadrangular pier (fig. ), and the next development is the tapering quadrangular pier (fig. ), both undeco- rated. next we have the pier with a capital which, in profile, is a simple cavetto gorge," and square abacus (fig. ). between the abacus and the entablature or beam is . or “ aa fig. .- column of the hypostyle hall of the ramesseum ; from horeau. (p. & c.) fig. .-quadrangular pier (p. & c.) a square thickness of stone; this is the great defect in the egyptian orders, and distinguishes the latter from the egyptian art. com greek orders. this space between the abacus and the architrave is bad, both from a scientific and artistic point of view. it robs the capital of its legitimate appearance as a sup- porting member. this pier, with capital and the hathoric pier (fig. ), with the head of the goddess hathor, are both deco- rated. we next come to the octagonal (fig. ), and the sixteen-sided pillars (fig. ), which are almost greek in their classic simplicity; the latter is fluted. all forms of egyptian columns have either square slabs or cir- fig. .— tapering quad- rangular pier. (p. & c.) cular discs as bases, on which the column rests. the two latter mentioned pillars are fig. .—pier with capital. (p. & c.) fig. .-hathoric pier, (p. & c.) exceptional, and therefore not typical egyptian, in having the abacus directly under the architrave; the sixteen-sided historic orvajent. pillar is especially doric-like in this respect, and also in its fluted shaft (fig. ). the supports known as “osiride” pillars are chiefly of the date of the nineteenth dynasty. they have a kind of analogy to the caryatid grecian pillars, but are unlike them in respect that they do not support the entablature, பட்ட x fig. .-octagonal pillar, beni- hassan. (p. & c.) fig. .-sixteen-sided pillar ; fluted. (p. & c.) as they are only placed in front of the quadrangular sup- porting pier for purposes of decoration, and are usually meant as representations of the kings who erected the temples they decorate, with a head-dress ornament con- sisting of the attributes of osiris (fig. ). another variety of column has a fanciful combination of floral forms for its capital (fig. ). this and others of egyptian art. fanciful design are from the bas-reliefs and wall-paintings, and remind us of similar creations of the artist's pencil, as. seen in the pompeian wall decorations. the upp er parts of the capital are developments from www lidia 눌 ​!, fig. .-osiride pillar from medinet-abou. (p. & c.) the calyx of the lotus, with the sepals curled outwards, and look very much like the first notions of the greek ionic capital, as indeed we shall find the ionic volute to be a development of the lotus calyx more than anything else. an example of the faggot-shaped column, with its base, lotus-capital, and entablature, is given at fig. . historic ornament. the ornamental parts of this column were painted in bright yellow and blue, and, as a rule, the sculptured ornament of the egyptian columns, architrave, and cornices were relieved by the painter in bright colours. the illustration at fig. is that of the palm-shaped capital from sesebi. this type of capital is a frank imitation of a bunch of palm-leaves tied by the circular bands around the top of a column. a later development of the palm capital shows the bell shape with a more complicated decoration, fig. .-column from bas fig. .—palm-capital from sesebi. relief. (p. & c.) (p. & c.) and has the hathor-headed abacus, surmounted by a naos (fig. ) egyptian art. selman matt egyptian ornament and industrial art. a great part of egyptian ornament and decoration is composed of symbolic forms, the remainder is made up of geometrical ornament, such as checkers, meanders, frets, rosettes, diapers of lotus and other forms. natural forms of flowers and foliage were not copied direct, but only used in shape of geometric abstractions, and their arrangement as diapers in surface decoration was de- rived, in the first instance, from the older arts of weav- ing and matting. the old egyptians were skilled in weaving both plain and figured fabrics, chiefly from flax and hemp fibre. the lotus form was pre-emi- nently the leading motive in egyptian floral ornament. the papyrus (from which our word paper is derived) and the palm are next in importance as motives from which egyptian ornament is derived. the lotus-plant (nymphæa nelumbo), the variety in fig. .– hathor-headed campani- which the leaves grow up philæ. (p. & c.) form capitals, temple of neetanebo, at out of the water and do not lie on its surface, is shown at fig. , and drawings, evidently from nature, at fig. , from the tomb of ptah- hotep. the lotus flower in ornament may be seen in the ceiling i icc historic ornament. decorations from tombs at fig. , nos. and ; at figs. , ; and in the painted frieze from thebes (fig. ), where the similarity between this and the assyrian lotus, fir-cone and daisy may be noticed (see fig. ). fig. .—the nymphea nelumbo; flower, leaf, and fruit. (p. & c.) . com the bi-lateral rendering of the lotus plant is not com- mon in egyptian ornament, though it is the oldest form of the lotus known, as it occurs on the prehistoric pottery of koptos, and on tombs of the fourth dynasty (fig. ), egyptian art. and earlier. two lotus flowers are here seen tied together; the general outline of the flower is only rendered which would enclose the sepals and petals when seen in a side view. the lotus flower and bud alternating in a border orna- ment may be regarded as the prototype of the greek palmate borders. we are inclined to believe in professor goodyear's theory, that the egg and tongue decoration on the greek ovolo moulding is nothing more than a disrupted lotus and bud ornament developed in transition through wa ia fig. .- drawings of the lotus from the tomb of ptah-hotep. (p. & c.) the rhodian pottery decoration. the shells and the tongue were originally the lotus calyx, and the egg or pebble the lotus bud. other plants, as the thistle, convolvulus, daisy, vines, and grapes, &c., were used very much in decoration, especially during the akhenaten period (eighteenth and nineteenth dynasties), when the decoration was of a florid kind. the papyrus is seen in the ceiling ornament fig. , no , at fig. , and on the perfume spoon of carved wood (fig. ). the ceiling decorations (fig. ), from the theban tombs, show the fine sense and feeling the egyptians had for the appropriate decoration of flat 민 ​ monu vie svpe anie avve amvp) come fig. .-specimens of ceiling decoration at thebes; from prisse. (p. & c.) egyptian art. surfaces, and the judicious balance maintained in the contrasting units of the ornament. fig. .–lotus and water orna- ment. fig. .---painted border ; from thebes, after prisse. (p. & c.) in animal forms found in egyptian decoration there are a few distinct and typical varieties, that have been used fig. .-flattened form of lotus-leaf ornament; front view and section . (p. & c.) times without number, both in painting and in carving in the round; and in the bas-reliefs of stone, wood, and in historic ornament. gold, silver, ivory, and bronze. among the most frequent is the vulture, with outstretched wings, having sacred symbols in his claws. it has been used appropriately in wha >>>>>>> fig. .- hunting in a marsh ; from a bas-relief in the tomb of ti. (p. & c.) this form as ceiling decoration in the great temples at thebes, on a blue ground diapered with golden stars; the ceilings thus are symbolic representations of the heavens at night (fig. ). egyptian art. similar outstretched wings have been added to the scarabs or sacred beetles. these winged scarabs, together with similar winged-globe and uræus creations, have been mxxxxxxxxx tl fig. .–vultures on a ceiling. (p. & c.) used as ceiling decorations in tombs and on mummy- cases, and sometimes the goddess isis, or nepththys, was furnished with these wings as guardian of the tomb (figs. and ). mumum til x Х downlului zinavinvinnu fig. .– winged-globe with uræus. (p. & c.) the uræus and winged-globe was a favourite decoration for cornices and for heads of doorways (fig. ). the colouring of the winged-globe decoration was generally, in the case of the globe, a red colour, as the emblem of the sun; the wings green, and the striped ground behind the historic ornament. figure was painted in alternating stripes of red, blue, and white, which produced an effective arrangement of colour. 上市​ ean . use comer fig. zu.- painting on mummy-case. (p. & c.) . . . tauchersona fig. .—hunting in the desert. (m.) the egyptians excelled in the drawing of animals and birds in outline, and in bas-relief carvings of them, some examples of which are given at figs. , , - egyptian art. many chimerical animals or monsters were used in egyptian decoration, as sphinxes, or imaginary animals of the desert, which were really fanciful creations of the artist's pencil (figs. , , , ). their representations of iions always have an expression of dignity, though more mild in aspect than the assyrian lion in art (fig. ). pottery, glass, and earthenware were manufactured in egypt from the earliest times. the country was well supplied with good potter's clay; bricks were made and dried in the sun, not burned, and were used very much in e.w. fig. .-antelope and papyrus. (p. & c.) building. the common pottery was unglazed, and their decorated pottery was in glazed earthenware, but not so highly decorated as many other objects of industrial art. fig. is a common pitcher of fairly good form, in red earth. the decoration on the enamelled earthenware dish (fig. ) is composed of bouquets of lotus flowers; and that on the larger basin or bowl is a design of lotus and mystic signs (fig. ). the three objects are in the british museum. rosettes and plaques have been found enamelled in colours, and probably used for floor or wall tiles. the doorway to the stepped pyramid at sakkarah is decorated with rows of convex-shaped rectangular plaques of vol. i. h historic ornament. enamelled earthenware of a greenish-blue glaze. some are black in colour. the egyptians were particularly skilful in glass making, á المو) tron fig. .-netting birds ; from a tomb. (p. & c.) fig. .- quadruped with head of a bird. (p. & c.) but they never produced quite a clear glass; it was always slightly opaque, but generally bright and rich in colour. vases, cups, pateræ, statuettes, necklaces, goblets, brace- lets, and, above all, enormous quantities of beads, which od gbenedite fig. .-sphinx or man-headed lion, in black granite, from tanis. (p. & c.) historic ornament. they used to make a network of to cover their dead. great quantities of glass objects were exported in trade with the phoenicians. the venetians during the middle ages imported soda kriosphinx, from karnak. (p. & c.) fig. .-ram, or in large quantities from alexandria, for purposes of glass making, the soda of egypt being famed for this purpose, as it was prepared from the many marsh-loving plants that grew luxuriantly in the delta. fig. .– enamelled earthenware dish, british museum. (p. & c.) fig. .—pitcher of red earth, british museum. (p. & c.) fig. .-enamelled earthenware bowl, british museum. (p. & c.) egyptian art. of kha-em-uas, son of rameses ii. (fig. ), and the golden hawk (fig. ). the former is a splendid and unique specimen of a w iwas yu tillin stele.g. pimte fig. .--pectoral; actual size. (p. & c.) pectoral, or breast ornament for the dead. these pectorals have been found in great numbers, made of wood, metal, and earthenware. the general shape is that of a naos, or historic ornament. little temple. the kha-em-uas pectoral is made of gold inlaid with lapis lazuli, and is thus described by m. pierret : juuuuuu luonnor untut do now fig. .—golden hawk; actual size. (p. & c.) ut luuuuuula steige " jewel in the form of a naos, in which a vulture and an uræus are placed side by side ; above them floats a hawk n fig. .- fragment of an ivory castanet, louvre. historic ornament. with extended wings, in his claws are seals, emblems of eternity. under the frieze of the naos an oval, with the prenomen of rameses ii., is introduced. two tet (or dad, symbol of stability) are placed in the lower angles of the frame.” the golden hawk is a similar kind of ornament, with crescent wings and seals in its claws, emblems of fig. .—ivory plaque ; late work. (p. & c.) reproduction and eternity. the workmanship in these articles looks like that of cloisonné enamels, but they are not enamels. the thin ribs of gold that surround the lapis lazuli stones in the pectoral and hawk are cloisons, but the stones are cut to fit into the spaces accurately, and are therefore inlaid, while in the true enamels the enamel egyptian art. is put in the cells and fused to the metal by fire afterwards. enamelling as known to the chinese was not practised in egypt. as ivory could be obtained from ethiopia in great quan- tities, it was natural that the egyptians would make good use of it. it was a favourite material with the sculptors, v fig. .- egyptian chair. (i'. & c.) fig. .—chair or throne. (p. & c.) and many fine examples of ivory carvings and incised work have been found in the tombs. the incised outlines on the ivory were usually filled in with black (figs. and ). gold, silver, ivory, and ebony were worked in usually by the same egyptian artist, as we learn from an inscription on a stele of iritesen, an egyptian sculptor, thus translated ma பொம் stelmeg. sielme.c figs. - .–perfume spoons, louvre. (p. & c.) ito historic ornament. the wall paintings and bas-reliefs that give representations of tables, chairs, and couches. some of the chairs or thrones are of special beauty (figs. and ). a oo fig. .--an egyptian ship, sailing and rowing. (m.) carpenter's shop showing the workmen making chairs is seen at fig. , and a coffer (fig. ). the feet of chairs and thrones were usually imitated from those of animals. fig. .—the river transport of a mummy from maspero. in wood-carving nothing could be daintier than the perfume spoons with figures and water plants decoratively treated (figs. , ). egyptian art. i the egyptian ships were singularly beautiful in their outlines, with their prows and sterns ending usually in a metal stalk and carved lotus flower or ram's head (figs. , ). the “bari,” or sacred boat which transported the dead, decorated at each end with the carved metal lotus, and pavilion or chapel in the centre, with its freight of the mummy and the mourners (fig. ), is represented as it sails off towards abydos, the city of the dead, to the west of thebes, and the crowds of friends on the banks of the river will salute the dead, saying: “in peace, in peace towards abydos ! descend in peace towards abydos, towards the western sea!” chapter viii. chaldean and assyrian art. the chaldeans or babylonians and the assyrians came from one great stock, the assyrians being mostly colonists from babylonia. the original inhabitants of chaldea spoke a semitic dialect. at an early date eastern chaldea was invaded by the sumerians or accadians, a turanian race which is supposed to have come from the plateau of central asia. the two languages were used side by side, the semitic as the common tongue, and the accadian as a literary language. the earliest known king of chaldea was named eannadu (b.c. ). the chaldeans advanced slowly along the tigris and pushed their kingdom towards assyria in the north, where they built the cities of ashur (kal’at sherkât), calah (nim- roud), and ninua (nineveh). the northern portion of the chaldeo-assyrian empire asserted its independence about b.c., and assyria became a separate kingdom. from b.c. , when tukulti-adar i., the assyrian king, conquered babylonia, down to the destruction of nineveh, b.c. , the chaldean kingdom took a place of secondary importance, while assyria became the greatest power of western asia. tiglath-pileser i. (b.c. ), and ashur-nasir-pal (b.c. ), were amongst the greatest kings of assyria. the latter was a great builder. he built the great palace at calah (nimroud), the place to which he removed his seat of government from ashur. assyrian art reached a high state of development in his reign. his son and chaldean and assyrian art. one successor, shalmaneser ii. (b.c. - ) was no less powerful; he extended his kingdom by wars from the persian gulf to the armenian mountains, and from media to the mediterranean. jehu, king of israel, sent him tribute. after his death assyria declined and shrank within its borders, but under tiglath-pileser iii. regained its lost ground again (b.c. ). sargon, the “son of no (b.c. - ), usurps the throne, makes great wars, is the first king of assyria that comes in contact with the egyptians. he built the great palace at khorsabad, which in late years has been excavated. sennacherib, his son, succeeded him, whose wars with hezekiah, king of judah, are recorded in the bible in the book of kings. he built a great palace at nineveh, many of the wall slabs of which are now in the british museum. the death of the succeeding monarch, esarhaddon, took place before he had completed his great palace at calah (nimroud). another palace supposed to be his has lately been excavated at nineveh. it lies buried under the mound of nebi yunus. the assyrian kings were great builders of palaces. each one, it appears, thought it his duty either to add a large portion to a palace of his predecessor, or to build a new one for himself. ashur-bani-pal, who reigned for forty-two years (b.c. - ), was one of the most powerful and most cruel of all the assyrian monarchs. his victory over the elamites is depicted on the sculptured slabs that enrich the ninevite gallery of the british museum. at his death the assyrian power was broken up, partly by the scythian hordes that swept over that part of asia, and partly by the medes. nineveh was besieged by cyaxares of media, and by nabopolassar, an assyrian general who held command in babylonia. it was at length captured and destroyed (b.c. ). the whole empire was then divided between the medes and the babylonians. the new babylonian empire lasted seventy years, and in the reign of its last king, nabonidus, when under the command of belshazzar, his son, babylon was vol. i. i histcric ornament. captured by cyrus of persia (b.c. ). from this time until its subjugation by alexander the great babylon was under the persians. the religion of the chaldeo-assyrian nation was the worship of the sun, moon, stars, and the various powers of nature. their chief gods were shamash, the sun ; sin, the moon ; marduk, a sun-god, the carrier of prayers from earth to heaven; anum, the sky god; bel, the god of the taucber gud fig. .-a winged bull, assyria. (m) earth ; and ea, the god of great knowledge: the last three were the trinity. other gods were dagon, the fish-god; ishtar, their venus; nabu, their mercury and scribe of the gods; rammánu, the god of wind and thunder; and negral, the god of war and hunting. the assyrian and babylonian people have a proverbial name for being a warlike and cruel race, in opposition to their contemporaries, the more peaceful and gentle egyp- chaldean and assyrian art. tians. at the same time they have the reputation of being highly skilled in arts and sciences. g cliy female sielne gautier fig. .- demons, from the palace of assurbanipal, british museum. (p. & c.) coate sc the greatness of the chaldeans in astronomy, in astrology, and as wise men generally, is too well known to be repeated. their skill in the arts of building, sculpture, historic ornament. in the use of metals, in pottery, tiles, gem cutting, painting, embroidery and weaving, excites our wonder and admiration. the art of the assyrians is intensely earnest and full of realism, vigorous in the highest degree, and true art of its kind. it is the art of a people who were brave and powerful, and of princes that were despotic and stern. the keynote of their art was force, whether displayed in its physical and realistic aspects, in the sculptural repre- sentations of ferocious animals, as their lions and dogs, or embodied in their mysterious and wonderful creations of human - headed bulls, and other monsters and demons (figs. , ), or in the haughty self-consciousness of strength and power, with which their sculptors scught to invest the representations of the monarchs going forth fig. .- a griffon in the egyptian style. (m.) to battle or to the lion hunt (fig. ); everywhere, in the higher aspects of assyrian art, physical force, or personal force of will, is the culminating point of expression aimed at in all their efforts. the sculptured lion of the egyptians is couchant, half slumbering; the assyrian lion is rampant and roaring for his prey. the simile may be used to illustrate the cha- racteristic difference of the art of both countries the assyrian made his art minister to his worldly uses and delights, the egyptian lavished his on the tomb and for the hereafter. the assyrian religion and the chaldean magicians' and astrologers' exposition of its mysteries, doubtless gave the subject-matter for the creation of those strange combina- tions of chimeras, monsters, and bi-form deities that are so common in assyrian art. the griffons and other curious hybrid creatures of the chaldean and assyrian art. middle ages, and those that adorn the gothic buildings of q ) time vit ano """""ill selmes fig. .—eagle-headed divinity from nimioud, with the sacred tree. (p. & c.) our own days, can be traced to their birthplace in assyrian art. the great god of the assyrians was named assur, the historic ornament. all-powerful god of battles. in his name all kinds of cruelty and torture were practised on heretics and apostates, and in his name, and to extend his kingdom of assyria, wallet delo fig. . -figure of a goddess in act of adoration, british museum. (p. & c.) the ninevite kings found their excuses to make war with nations far and near. he seems to have been a later creation of the assyrian gods, but became supreme as chaldean and assyrian art. nineveh rose in power. he was supposed to have de- scended from sin, the moon-god. the winged-globe, رزر: zero juillll fig. .-- the winged globe with the figure of a god. (p. & c.) with the god in the centre holding the bow and arrow, or thunder-bolt (fig. ), is by some thought to be a representation of assur. a similar figure is seen at the .:):)) ra ches ? :// fig. .– the winged globe ; from layard. (p. & c.) top of the assyrian standard, as the “director of armies” (fig. ). this figure in the centre of the ring or solar disk, who is evidently divine, by reason of his feathered i historic ornament. lower garment, and his wings that raise him in mid-air, above all humanity, is quite likely to be the original type of the later persian supreme god, athura-mazda (see fig. ), and the emblematic symbol of his divinity is quite likely to have been designed and adapted from the winged disk or “globe" of the egyptians. ce ikli fig. .--the assyrian standard. (p. & c.) fig. .- dagon, the fish-god. (p. & c.) the winged globe (fig. ) of the assyrians is an imi- tation of that of egypt; this emblem having found its way into assyria on many carvings in ivory and on articles in bronze, carried hither by the trading phoenicians from egypt, and the emblem in question was, according to perrot, appropriated by the assyrians. chaldean and assyrian art. ) மாயாவையார் alerinyanvai tada roky ( gantar comte fig. .- assurbanipal attacked by lions, british museum. (p. & c.) i historic ornament. in their ornament and decoration they were more free and natural than the egyptians, and the execution was careful and refined, as witnessed by their bronze bowls, gem-engraving, and the patterns on the enamelled bricks. the bronze gates from balâwât in the british museum are examples of highly skilful repoussé work. their palaces must have presented a gorgeous and glittering appearance in their rich colouring and enamelled brilliancy. although not a single specimen of assyrian weaving has been discovered, we have abundant and sufficient evidence from the sculptured patterns of textiles and embroideries the kings' robes and wall decorations that both weaving and embroidery must have been one of their most glorious arts. the asiatic love of colour would lead us to suppose that these embroideries were excessively rich in colour (figs. a, a, , ) as they were in design. the details of this embroidery design (fig. a) are well drawn, and the design is full of rich variety without heaviness or too much crowding. the king is seen twice represented in the circle doing homage to the sacred tree and to the winged disk; and in other places he is between two genii or deities; combats of lions and bulls, palmate borders, fir-cones, and spirals, with bands that divide the work in varied spaces, complete these rich designs in embroidery, which are among the very finest efforts of assyrian decorative art. details of embroidery patterns are shown at figs. , . the sills or thresholds of the doors of the palaces were sometimes sculptured in low relief on large slabs of alabaster stone. the design is evidently copied from an embroidered carpet; perhaps the central part of the one given (fig. ) is a copy from a fabric woven in the loom, and the border, enlarged at fig. , would have its original in embroidery. the figure of the plan and elevation of part of a chal- chaldean and assyrian art. نيا /: ( ۱ . دار و سرکاری نظره ii .../ ..... * ccccccccer اررر از eeeeee فر ر ::مر / k ((۱۰ .) د ۱ #a/ : fig. a.—embroidery upon a royal mantle; from layard. (p. & c.) + historic ornament. ) well kk te in wote mden.cz fig. a.-embroidery on the upper part of a royal mantle; from layard. (p. & c.) chaldean and assyrian art. dean façade in enamelled bricks, from warka, is decorated with patterns that, no doubt, had their origin in weaving and matting (fig. ). the surface of this façade is fig. .–detail of embroidery; from layard. (p. & c.) composed of terra-cotta cones, with their bases turned out- wards. these bases were previously dipped in enamelled (۴۰ fig. .—detail of embroidery; from layard. (p. & c.) colours before they were inserted into the clay cement; so they form a kind of terra-cotta mosaic work (loftus). the land of chaldea was devoid of stone for building historic ornament. purposes, but extremely rich in immense banks of clay, which was used for brick making from the carliest times in chaldea. the chaldean brick is rather more than one fig. .--sill of a door from khorsabad ; length, ins. (p. & c.) a do jau english foot square, and about four inches in thickness; of a dark red colour to light yellow. nearly all of them have an inscription with the name of the king, &c. (fig. ). chaldean and assyrian art. the brick from erech, or ancient warka, gives a good idea of one of the oldest forms of chaldean writing known (fig. ). it consists of an abridgment of the repre- sentation of natural objects, as all alphabets in their criginal state were merely pictures or pictographs. this inscription shows the stage of conventional signs or solut miera in fig. .-- fragment of border of fig. ; from a threshold of khorsabad. (p. & c.) ideographic writing before it underwent the change into the cuneiform, or wedge-shaped writing of the assyrians. some of the bricks were made wedge-shaped, for use in the building of arches and vaults. the common bricks were sometimes used in the crude state, or unburnt, and burnt. enamelled bricks were greatly used in chaldea, historic ornament. but the clay of which they were made was softer and more friable. this was used purposely, so that the enamel would sink deeper into the soft material, and thereby make a more lasting surface protection. o do w o fig. .—plan and elevation of part of a façade at warka; from loftus. (p. & c.) osio assyria copied most of her art and sciences from her older sister in civilisation, and had the advantage over chaldea in a good supply of building stone, that formed the substructural bed for the clay deposits. this was a chaldean and assyrian art. sulphate of chalk known as alabaster, grey in colour, and easy to work. the great wall slabs used for the bas- "il hita fig. .—babylonian brick, ins. square, ins. thick. (p. & c.) reliefs and the winged bulls and other statuary, were carved out of this material; but the assyrians used bricks for the det la welt. peed fig. .-brick from erech. (p. & c.) main structure of their buildings, like the chaldeans. timber was scarce in assyria, but was used very much vol. i. k historic ornament. in the palaces. it was brought from the mountains of upper mesopotamia, on the left bank of the tigris, and, later, cedar and other woods were transported from the forests of lebanon for the beams of the palaces and temples. all kinds of metals, burnished and unburnished, were used as decorative accessories, especially by the chaldeans. the historians' descriptions, the foundations that have been excavated, and the sculptured buildings on the bas- reliefs, are the materials, together with well-preserved wysbergen fig. .–one of the gates of the harumat, dur-sarginu. (m.) fragments of architecture, which archæologists and archi- tects have used to enable them to restore some of the wonderful temples and palaces of ancient assyria (fig. ). the bird's-eye view of the palace of dur-sarginu will give a good idea of the typical assyrian palaces (fig. ), and the triumphal gate with its man-headed winged bulls at the base and sides (fig. ), and also the other gate at fig. , both with their crenallated battlements, serve to show the imposing character of these edifices. it will be noticed from the bird's-eye view and the gateways that the general character of assyrian architecture was rectan- chaldean and assyrian art. gular in the highest degree. the arch and vaulted struc- tures were known to the assyrians, who used them to great fig. .-interior of a temple, after layard's restoration. oooooooo advantage (figs. and ), and much more so than the egyptians, although the latter people occasionally employed them. historic ornament. the chaldeans, as would naturally be expected, used the arch construction very much in their brick buildings, as it would be the only means of carrying roofs and upper floors, where stone and timber could not easily be obtained (fig. ). the use of the column in chaldea is proved by the bas- reliefs before it developed itself in assyria ; but in either country it was not an important feature in the architec- ture, being mostly used for awnings supporting light tents பெபபெடெடெடெயி fig. .—triumphal gate at the entrance of the palace. (m.) or tabernacles; sometimes, indeed, used in a disengaged way, as proved by the views of small temples on the bas- reliefs (figs. , , ). the use of the column was not in accord with the principles of their architecture, and was only to be found in small porches, or in an engaged way against outer walls and piers (fig. ). the only capital found in a fragment, and restored by place, is shown at fig. , and two bases (figs. and ). from these remains it is assumed that the shaft was smooth and cylindrical. an incipient form of the ionic volute is seen at fig. chaldean and assyrian art. } in the capital of the small columns to the little temple (fig. ). wa fig. .—the royal palace of dur-sarginu (sargon's palace); restored by chipiez. (m.) the kings of assyria had in their palaces a great deal of luxurious furniture. the couches, chairs, and tables historic ornament. were made of wood, with bronze fittings, and decorated with ivory, gold, and lapis lazuli. the bas-relief in the british museum representing assurbanipal and his queen at a banquet (figs. and ) will give a good idea of mgogo, fig. .—a bedroom in the harem at dur-sarginu (sargon's palace). (m.) the extreme richness in design and decoration of these sumptuous articles of furniture (fig. ). bronze sockets (fig. ) and all kinds of fragments in metal and ivory fittings, and decorations correspond- ing to the designs on the bas-reliefs, all indicate that the anathemas of the prophet nahum (nahum ii. ) gave chaldean and assyrian art. a good picture of nineveh's richness in the sumptuary arts. “take ye the spoil of silver," he exclaims, “take the // fig. .- capital of temple at fig. . (p. & c.) fig. .-capital. (p. & c.) chi fig. .--temple on the bank of a river, khorsabad, from batta. (p. & c spoil of gold; for there is none end of the store and glory out of all the pleasant furniture.” historic ornament. animals have been represented with such faithfulness, especially in their most vigorous and ferocious aspects, by the sculptors of assyria, that in any notice of assyrian art fig. .–fragment of an assyrian building from a bas-relief, b.m. (p. & c.) fig. .-ornamented base of limestone. (p. & c.) wa they must have a place. lions especially were rendered in all their ferociousness, and were the favourite game for kingly sport (figs. , , ). lions were kept in cages, wii pumpign puri fig. .-winged sphinx carrying base of capital. layard. (p. & c.) fig. .- assyrian capital compiled from place. (p. & c.) fig. .-assurbanipal and his queen feasting in the gardens of the harem after the battle. the head of teuman, the elamite king, hangs on the left on the sacred tree. (m.) maula fh armu niz iiiiii. title buddr mum tilaukut to go st elmeg av tier jumte.it fig. .—the feast of assurbanipal. (b.m.) (p. & c.) enlarged detail of fig. , showing the assyrian furniture. drawn by gautier- chaldean and assyrian art. and let out when the monarch decided to have a day's hunting (fig. ). dogs were specially trained for lion- hunting (fig. ). we add two illustrations of the sphinx variety of fan- tastic animals; one is the most remarkable creation of all the fantastic animals of assyria (fig. ). it has the horns of a ram, a bull's head, a bird's beak; body, tail, and ll!!! .!! de elo مریم m's ? fig. .-assyrian stool; from layard. (p. & c.) fore-legs of a lion; and the hind-legs and wings of the eagle. the andro-sphinx (fig. ) from the robe of assurbanipal foreshadows the fabulous centaurs of grecian art. other bi-form creations have been found in assyrian art bearing a close resemblance to the greek centaur. the purely ornamental forms from the vegetable world that have been used in assyrian and chaldean art are limited in number. the daisy or rosette is the commonest historic ornament. wav dun mont ) ilu: fig. .—bronze foot of a piece of furniture. s.cme cartier fig. .–lion coming out of his cage. (b.m.) (p. & c.) chaldean and assyrian art. (figs. and ). in the illustration of the “lion and lioness in a park” (fig. ) the daisy is beautifully though conventionally rendered; the large leaves at the comteg , fig. .-lion and lioness in a park. (b.m.) (p. & c.) bottom are typically the common daisy leaves; the vine is no less well executed, and the lioness on the same bas- relief is treated with consummate skill. the vine is also - what l/if ৫. fig. .—combat between a lion and a unicorn; from layard. (p. & c.) i/?.. . *ং, ! hit @jন্যান্ট " fig. . - dog used for lion hunting. (m.) ")))). fig. . -- chariot horses; from layard. (p. & c.) chaldean and assyrian art. seen to great advantage in its conventional treatment at figs. and . there is an assyrian ornament called the “knop and fig. .- fantastic animal, drawn by gäüiier. (p. & c.) ww shelme. flower” ornament, which occurs in various forms and in endless profusion in egyptian, assyrian, persian, and greek, and even is copied down to indian and roman historic ornament. ornament. it may be native, or some forms of it at least, to assyrian ornament, but is undoubtedly egyptian in its earliest source; we have spoken of it before in our notice of egyptian ornament as being derived from the lotus (page ). it appears on the rich border of the carved threshold (fig. ); the flower there is undoubtedly a lotus, and the bud or "knop" may be a representation of a “fir-cone,” or may be meant for the closed lotus-bud. another form of the same elements occurs at fig. , in a beautiful design enclosed in a square, forming one of the central patterns of a similar sill or threshold, and this form fig. .-andrɔ-sphinx, robe of assurbanipal; from layard. (p. & c.) of it would doubtless also be used for a ceiling decoration of the palaces. a bouquet of similar flowers is seen at fig. of the date of assurbanipal ( - b.c.). it is very difficult to say whether this bouquet represents the lotus or not, as, according to the testimony of layard, the lotus flower is only to be found on the most recent of assyrian monuments dating from the eighth and seventh centuries b.c., at the time when assyria had invaded and occupied the delta of egypt. if not the lotus flower, some- thing very like has been found on monuments in assyria much older than these dates. as the result of some recent scientific examinations into the origin of pattern, some investigators have decided that chaldean and assyrian art. the “knop and flower” patterns of assyrian ornament (figs. , , and ) are but evolutions of tassels, and knotted fringes of matting and embroideries, just because zwas , fig. .-detail from the enamelled archivolt, khorsabad ; from place. (p. & c.) pen they bear a not very clear resemblance to such trimmings as we see on the tabernacle on the balâwât gates (fig. ), &c. we admit that there is a fancied resemblance in- l vol. i. friwwers ... ;-)!!! fig. .-- rosette of lotus flowers and buds. (p. & c.) fig. .-bouquet of flowers and buds; from layard. (p. & c.) chaldean and assyrian art. many ornamental forms to patterns that have been evolved from constructed articles, especially from woven and matted examples, but it is an insult to the intelligence of an artist to ask him to believe that the beautiful and clearly dis- tinctive floral, bud and palmate borders in egyptian, .. ;": lin - ko untire uw பராமாப்பயறு 'tilýsin pulit fig. .—tabernacle from the balâwât gates. (b.m.) (p. & c.) date, b.c. to . assyrian, and greek art have resulted from tyings and knottings of the fringed ends of mats, when one can clearly see the daisy-in some cases turned to a disk—the palm, and, above all, the lotus, almost naturally drawn and modelled; even the connecting lines of flower and buds, where scientific connection with the fringed-end idea seems the strongest in the eyes of the evolutionist, will be found on examination to be always used in the exact reverse way historic ornament. os kkkkkkkk as <<<<<<< o to that which is formed by the constructive joinings of the knotted fringe. (see figs. and .) it will require an amazing quantity of scientific proof to get rid of the lotus in egyp- tian ornament, and much also to turn it and the daisy into tassel knots in assyrian ornament, when we have overwhelming evidence as to the natural representa- tions of such floral forms, as well the conventional designs derived from them, on the very oldest monu- ments in both countries. the “sacred tree," or “tree of life," is often represented in assyrian art, and under different forms, but generally with a king or some divinity on either side of it, paying homage (figs. , a, ). an enlarged portion of it is seen at fig. . the exact meaning of the “ sacred tree ” has not yet been satisfactorily explained, but, at any rate, it seems likely enough that it repre- sents a palm-tree, shown by the palmate head and by the conventional markings on the trunk, no doubt meant for the bark roughening lines. the surrounding palmates may be meant to represent a leafy enclosure for the sacred tree in the centre, or the whole thing may be a conventional picture of a sacred grove. < historic ornament, fig. .-venus of milo. fig. .-statue of hermes, capitol. lime-tree, were sacred to her, but varied according to the locality and times. grecian people and mythology. hermes (mercury) is the god of shepherds and of n filling fig. .—diana of versailles. pastures, and also of commerce and trade. when a child he invented the lyre from a tortoise-shell which he was grecian people and mythology, hadrian, now in the louvre, she is represented as the protectress of wild animals. mnemosyne (memory) is the mother of the muses. the nine muses are - clio (history), melpomene (tragedy) (fig. ), terpsichore (dancing), polyhymnia (religious service), thalia (comedy), urania (astronomy), euterpe (lyric poetry), erato (erotic poetry and geometry), and calliope (epic poetry and science generally). dionysus or bacchus is, with both greeks and romans, the god of wine, of vineyards, and of autumn blessings. naxos was the chief seat of his worship. it was on this fig. .-dionysus and the lion, from the monument of lysikrates. island that he met and married ariadne, the daughter of minos, king of crete, who had been deserted here by theseus, her former lover. the story of dionysus punishing the tyrrhenian pirates who took him prisoner, intending to sell him as a slave, and of his changing him- self to a lion and so terrifying the sailors, who jumped overboard and were changed into dolphins, is the subject of the fine relief on the frieze of the lysikrates monument (fig. and frontispiece). the lion, tiger, bull, and ram are his favourite animal attributes among plants, the vine, the ivy, and the laurel were sacred to him. historic ornament. bacchanalian subjects and festivals of dionysus occupy a large and important place in the art of greece, rome, and pompeii. nice, victoria, or victory is always represented with m fig. .–victory, munich collection. wings, a palm branch, and holding a laurel wreath, and, as would be expected, was more extensively venerated at rome than in greece. in the latter country her statues are generally of a small size, and she is an accompanying goddess to athene and zeus (fig. ). fig. .--perspective view of the lion's gate. (p. & c.) art in primitive greece. parod doiddodoodoo doo doo ń w , - lik, in the trojan plain, in the north-west corner of asia minor. the character of the stone, clay, wood, and lime og arool udodoc noha qu wolonte uutuudio muuuu עוונםםםם jer arheol dominohen doidde tit mum ano gada பப்பப்படoduni - fig. .- alabaster frieze, tiryns. (p. & c.) it -- , - - . --- , ----- *------ , fig. .—plan of fig. , alabaster frieze. (p. & c.) materials, and similarity of the construction, enable the archæologi-t to place the rernains found at these three places as belonging to the same epoch of time and style historic ornament. ! of art which has been called mycenian. the oldest monument of greek sculpture yet discovered is supposed fig. . - ivory plaque from mycenæ. (p. & c.) novo u mbi fig. .–fragment of frieze from mycenæ. (p. & c.) itdcini to be the lion's gate of the mycenian acropolis (fig. ). art in primitive greece. pausanias thus alludes to mycenæ and tiryns :-"a portion of the enclosure wall still remains, and the prin- cipal gate, with the lions over it. these (the walls) were fig. .- mycenian palace, second epoch. architrave and frieze. (p. & c.) co built by the cyclops who made the wall at tiryns for præteus. among the ruins at mycenæ is the fountain called perseia, and the subterraneous buildings of atreus and his children, in which their treasures were stored.” historic ornament. . the sculptured lions are still there, so is the spring perseia, and the wonderful treasure-house of atreus is still the best preserved of all the domed tomb buildings of mycenæ. ooo on м ap . her m f be g h С e a fig. .—mycenian palace, second epoch. restoration of entablature. (p. & c.) from the remains of mycenian architecture, messrs. perrot and chipiez have ingeniously restored some of the wooden construction of the palaces of that early period, and have assumed that, from these early wooden construc- historic ornament. here again the stone-cutter has borrowed from the car- penter. to go back for some of the supposed beginnings of the doric frieze, the alabaster frieze, shown in plan and elevation at figs. and , has been found in the ruins of a palace at tiryns. the pattern of this frieze is the same as that which has been frequently found on other fragments from mycenæ. cececcecoooccer me fig. .–vase of woman's form, troy. (p. & c.) it resembles the doric triglyphs and metopes in con- sisting of a double design ; two semicircles back to back, divided by a vertical rectangular band, which is sub- divided by a vertical central division, having rosettes arranged vertically on either side. two similar designs are seen on the ivory plaque (figs. and ) and frag- ment of frieze from mycenæ. the same design appears art in primitive greece. also on the red porphyry fragments of the façade decora- tion on the mycenian beehive tombs. an illustration from perrot and chipiez shows an assemblage of the component parts of this frieze pattern, with a portion of the architrave in wood (fig. ). fig. .– vase from troy. (p. & c.) we refer the reader for a fuller description of the tran- sition of the doric entablature from the mycenian wood construction to perrot and chipiez' “ art in primitive greece," vol. ii. we extract a portion in explanation of the illustrations (figs. and ), where the - historic ornament. analogy between the wooden construction of the former and the stone construction of the latter is clearly estab- lished. fig. .– three-handled amphora, ialysos. (p. & c. fig. .–pilgrim's bottle, ialysos. (p. & c.) in fig. we have the entablature of the c. temple of selinous (one of the oldest examples of doric architecture), art in primitive greece. rendered famous by the archaic sculptures embellishing its metopes. there is not one of all the members we have passed in review but which appears in it. thus, a pair of stone beams, corresponding with the like number of timbers in the mycenian wood frame, constitute the architrave; and under listel c surmounting it, peers, flush with the triglyphs, the small plank b. its lower section is adorned by the ornament known as guttæ, the origin and meaning of which had hitherto been unsatisfactorily explained. the guttæ are cylindrical in shape detached from the walls, and in every respect v fig. .--vase with geometric decoration. (p. & c.) identical with the wooden pegs which occur in this situa- tion below the timber entablature. these same pegs again appear above the frieze in the semblance of another ornamental form, the “mutules” which, until lately, had seemed every whit as strange and problematical as the guttæ. the stone table n, in the lower surface of which the guttæ are carved, is no other than our old wood-plate, which in the mycenian carpentry work exhibits these same saliences or pegs, and served to fix the lining of the joists below. if the selinous mutules are sloped, it is because they are associated with a ridged roof; but as a flat covering has been assumed for mycenæ, it involved- without prejudice to the system-a horizontal position for the mutules. as regards the frieze, both here and in historic ornament. every doric building, it invariably consists, like the alabaster frieze, of pillars d alternating with slabs e. the function of the pillars (triglyphs) is to maintain the slabs (metopes) in place. siemeg fig. .– the marseilles ewer. (p. & c.) comparison between these two figures will further show all the details, with slight modifications, to be practically similar. thus, the whole of the doric order, the basis of all greek architecture, including the column, longitudinal art' in primitive greece. . . fig. .-gold ornaments, from troy. (p. & c.) fig. .- gold pendant, from troy. (p. & c.) historic ornament. beams, and joists supporting the roof, as well as the secondary decorative construction, had its origin in wooden construction, and there is hardly any doubt but that the fig. .-gold plate ornament, from troy. mycenian palace was its prototype. the greeks of later days forgot the borrowing of the timber construction, and pem. fig. .-gold disc. (p. & c.) have given names to some parts, such as “guttæ" (drops), which ought to be more correctly pegs. great quantities of pottery and objects of industrial art in metal—more especially in gold—have been found in art in primitive greece. the excavations at mycenæ, tiryns, and troy. the earthenware pottery is generally decorated in colours of brown, red, and greyish white. the patterns are very simple, bands and squares arranged in rows, some animal forms, leaves with wavy stems, and spirals; some of the pottery is decorated with marine animals, such as the octopus, cuttle-fish, argonaut, and with seaweed. some curious shaped vases of woman forms (figs. , ) have been found by dr. schliemann. pe fig. .-gold disc. (p. & c.) a pilgrim's bottle from ialysos decorated with circular bands, and an amphora with three handles, from the same place, decorated with bands and lily forms with curled- back petals, are very beautiful, and a small vessel with geometric ornament are all of the same character (figs. , , and ). the most beautiful form of mycenian pottery is the marseilles vase or ewer, in the borély collec- tion (fig. ). the decoration is a brown-black on a light ground, and historic ornament. consists of the argonaut shellfish and seaweed. it is likely to have been a copy from a metal object owing to its shape, which is characteristic of metal. in metal-work generally, and in the inlaying of gold and electrum in a bronze ground, the mycenian artists have produced some splendid work. there are six chromo- pif pars caja fig. .—gold cup, troy. (p. & c.) lithographs in messrs. perrot and chipiez's “art in primitive greece" of bronze mycenian daggers inlaid with gold and electrum of various shades: one has the representation of panthers hunting birds on a river- bank—the river is stocked with fish ; another has a lion hunt by armed men; a third, lions hunting gazelles; a fourth has running lions; a fifth, spiral ornamentation ; and the sixth a free rendering of lilies both on handle and art in primitive greece. blade. the art and workmanship of them all are of a high order. some gold ornaments from troy (figs. and ) show their skill in hand-wrought jewellery. the golden butterfly (fig. ) and the two gold discs (figs. and ) are stamped on the metal, and were fig. .-gold ewer, troy. (p. & c.) used as dress decorations; they were found in great quantities in the tombs of the women at mycenæ. one is an octopus design, and the other a butterfly. the gold cup (fig. ) and ewer (fig. ), found at troy along with many others in silver, gold, and bronze, give a fair idea of the beauty of shape and design of such articles of this period. they show marks of injury by fire vol. i. r chapter xiii. the greek and roman orders of architecture. although egypt and assyria are justly credited with the creation of the models and the invention of the methods that subsequently aroused to life the artistic genius of the greeks, yet the fact remains that, from all the wealth of artistic forms bequeathed to succeeding ages by the nations of hoary antiquity, prior to the grecian period, nothing has survived except those forms which greece has selected from her predecessors, and after remodelling them by her own standards of beauty and fitness, has left them as imperishable models of art for all nations that follow her. all historic art and architecture, whether classic or what not, since the days of pericles, is based on greek art, notwithstanding the many modifications which we see in byzantine, saracenic, romanesque, and their offshoots. all of them owe their life and vitality to greek traditions and to greek principles. we have seen that in the earlier greek buildings, such as mycenian palaces, timber construction must have largely entered into the architecture of that period, and it is quite likely that timber was used for the greater part of the greek domestic dwellings, which may account for no remains of them having been found. the rock-cut tombs of lycia, in asia minor, atford to us a further proof of timber construction which may have been in use in the early greek period in europe, and these tombs of lycia tend to throw a side light on the probable forms of greek construction that existed between the date of the mycenian buildings and that of the oldest doric greek and roman architecture. remains that are at present known, for the lycians had free intercourse with the ionians and european greeks. the . fig. .-lycian rock-built tomb at pinara. (p. & c.) earlier lycian tombs are of a great antiquity, and the same form of tomb has been used in lycia down to periods when greece was far advanced in art (figs. and ). historic ornament. the lycians formed a connecting link with the anterior asiatics and the ionian greeks. their origin and their language were asiatic, but the greater part of their art was the product of hellenic artists from ionian greece, and, therefore, the lycians must have been intimately connected with the greeks, and must have played an important part in the development of hellenic culture. r. fig. .-lycian rock-built tomb at pınara. (p. & c.) the greek temples were in some respects related to the egyptian temple. the pillar and beam construction was copied from egypt, and also the rectangular plan. the great distinction between the two was that rows of columns were placed outside the temples of the greeks, which gave to them a light and airy appearance, while in contra- distinction the egyptians had their rows of columns inside greek and roman architecture. the great hypostyle halls and galleries of their temples which gave to them the effect of oppressive gloominess. broadly speaking, the greek temple was something of the model of an egyptian temple turned inside out. the interior of a greek temple was simply a rectangular cella or cell where the statue of the god or goddess was set up, and sometimes a smaller chamber behind called the treasury. the smaller temples consisted of the cella only. a row of lighter columns sometimes supported the roof of the cella, as in the case of the parthenon. it was only in the case of the larger temples that we find more than one cell, while the egyptian temple was often a maze of large and small chambers, the multitude adding to the mystery sought for in all egyptian architecture. the greek temples were usually placed on a basement of steps, , and built on elevated positions. the greeks sought all publicity in the honouring of their deities, and in pleasing the passer-by with the sight of their beautiful buildings, on which their best decoration was shown on the outside. greek architecture dates from the end of the archaic age down to the death of alexander the great, from about b.c. to b.c. . it is usually divided into three styles or, as they are called, “orders," namely, the doric, the ionic, and the corinthian. the doric represents the european phase of the greek style, the ionic and corinthian having more of the asiatic features. the three orders were in use in greece at the same time, that is to say, a more severe and correct phase of the doric—the older order-was used after buildings in the newer orders had appeared. thom- son, in his “ode to liberty," has alluded to the orders in the lines first, unadorn'd and nobly plain, the manly doric rose; the ionic then, with decent matron grace, her airy pillar heaved ; luxuriant last, the rich corinthian spread her wanton wealth.” historic ornament. the greeks made use of the vertical and horizontal line in their architecture; the curved line was not used, except, of course, in decoration. the half-diameter of the column was the module or unit by which the whole building was measured, and the column was limited in height according to the diameter of its base. this did not preclude freedom in design; on the contrary, freedom was allowed and practised to such an extent that hardly two grecian buildings of any one order were alike in proportion or design. even the mouldings were varied in curve and proportion; these members that were with the romans merely segments of circles, were in section with the greeks either parts of the curve of the ellipse or parabola, and in many cases were designed by freehand. some very subtle devices to overcome natural optical effects when viewing the buildings have been discovered by mr. pennethorne and mr. penrose, more especially in the parthenon. it is well known that the entasis, or slight swelling made in greek columns, which makes a convex line of their profiles, is done to prevent the column from looking hollowed in the centre, which it would do if it were perfectly straight; but in addition to this the architects above named have discovered in the parthenon a correc- tion in the vertical lines, to prevent the apparent tendency which all high vertical lines have to spread out at the top, in the making of the columns to incline slightly inwards; and the steps of the basement and horizontal lines of the architraves are found to be slightly curved upwards in the middle to prevent the tendency that all long horizontal lines have to droop in the middle. thus we learn how admirably painstaking, and how well the greeks applied their profound knowledge to their architecture, as they did in everything else. the joints of their marble masonry were as a rule so fine and accurate in the fitting together, that it has been said a razor edge could not be inserted between them. the greek doric order (fig. ) is without a base; the عا م کی ( mutace creer of top trabon è ce fellet qutlane on 'toops ala coad a echince a. fig. .—the parthenon. greek doric, enlarged section of annulets at a. historic ornament. shaft of the column has twenty flutings; sunk lines or rings encircle the shaft a little below the moulding of the capital. this moulding—the echinus—is of the best possible profile that a supporting member could have; it is divided from the shaft by three or five annulets. above the echinus rests the square tile-like cap—the abacus—which carries the architrave. the latter is a marble beam with square ends, and above the architrave is the frieze separated by a band (taenia). the frieze has triglyphs alternating with metopes. the former consists of channelled pier-like forms one over and one between each column, and the metopes are square panels between two triglyphs on which are usually found sculptured subjects. at the bottom of each triglyph, separated by a fillet, is a row of pegs, cylin- drical or conical in shape, called “guttæ” or drops. above the frieze the cornice projects, which in profile consists of a flat band-the corona--and the crowning member, an ovolo moulding. under the projecting eave of the cornice are slanting slabs of marble-parallel to the roof tiles--placed one over each triglyph, and one over each metope. these are called mutules, and they have rows of guttæ on their under surface. the crowning members of the cornice are carried around the sloping lines of the triangular pediments at each end of the building. on the pediments were sculptured the figure subjects that had usually some relation to the divinity to whom the temple was dedicated; as, for example, on the parthenon pediment the story of the birth of athene was the subject executed and designed by phidias, who also was the sculptor of the celebrated panathenic frieze that adorned the outer part of the cella of the parthenon. ictinus was the architect of the parthenon and also of the temples of apollo epicurius at bassæ and at phigallia, both in arcadia. the parthenon was finished about b.c. . the greek ionic order in its capital and ornaments is quite distinct from the doric, and has more mouldings. dar muutuu fig. .— temple on the ilissus; greek ionic. historic ornament. the general plan of the temple is the same as in the doric, but the proportions of the various parts are more slender. it has been generally thought that the ionic volute was a development of the volutes from the persian capital at persepolis, but it is more likely, as before stated on page ), that their prototype is found on capitals derived from the egyptian lotus. the architrave is sometimes plain and sometimes divided into three facias. the frieze was usually occupied with sculpture, and the base of the column was composed of a double torus, with a hollow between; the lower torus was plain, and the upper one fluted (fig. ). the temple of diana at ephesus, the erectheum, and the mausoleum of halicarnassus were among the finest examples of the ionic order. the corinthian order was more roman than greek, though of greek invention, and was a rich type of archi- tecture that suited the growing vanity for love of display with the romans, who eagerly appropriated it in the second century b.c., and erected many fine buildings in this order; but often enriching the mouldings and all plain spaces almost beyond recognition. the most perfect and truly beautiful example of the greek corinthian is the small choragic monument of lysikrates at athens (frontispiece). its praises and merits have been spoken and written of by almost every architect of eminence; it may be said of it and of the parthenon that for proportion, and for marvellous unity of parts, and also for the perfect marriage of sculpture with architecture, no buildings have ever been erected to equal them. the bell of the corinthian capital, as in the lysikrates monument, is surrounded at the base by a row of water- plant leaves; acanthus leaves spring from these, and out of the latter spring volutes (cauliculi), the larger ones of which meet at the upper corners; the four smaller ones meet in the middle, and from the junction of the upper greek and roman architecture. ! mumu fig. .- capital of the lysikrates monument; greek corinthian. middle ones an upright palmate appears; rosettes are placed between each of the eight acanthus leaves. the abacus is moulded and curved in plan. the capital, as a historic ornament. whole, is designed in a masterly way, so as to give the utmost variety and contrast of beautiful forms (fig. ). the frieze is sculptured with figures which illustrate the story of dionysus and the tyrrhenian pirates (frontis- piece). the etruscans were a race of people who settled in the west of italy, between the arno and the tiber, at a very early date. their origin is uncertain, but they are sup- posed to have come from asia minor. they were known as great builders, and were well skilled in all the arts. in their larger works of fortifications and great walls they used stones of an enormous size (cyclopean). many places in italy still attest to the presence of the etruscans by the remains of these cyclopean walls. they were considerably advanced in architecture and the minor arts at the time when rome was first beginning to show its signs of power, and were the architects and builders who executed all the works for the early romans. the etruscans used the arch very much in building, a totomotot feature that the greeks, although they were acquainted with its use, did not think it necessary in their trabeated system of building. it was, on the other hand, a very favourite feature with the etruscans, from whom the romans learnt the use of it. the tarquins were an etruscan family who were masters fig. .-etruscan door from perugia. of rome in the sixth century b.c., and it was under these emperors that the great sewer, known as the cloaca maxima, was built, part of which is still in existence. this work consists of an arched waterway built in three concentric rings of large wedge-shaped stones (voussoirs). the etruscans constructed temples, palaces, and dwelling- היה thuitult greek and roman architecture. houses, all of which have perished or have been destroyed, and only a few remains of their walled cities survive. the gate of perugia (fig. ) is the remains of a characteristic etruscan building. the arch is seen in perfect construc- tion, and the doric frieze; above is seen a little ionic column. etruscan architecture was mostly a kind of doric with a round shaft. according to vitruvius the etruscan temple consisted of three cells, with one or more rows of columns in front, the distance between the columns, or intercolumniation, being much greater than in greek temples. sometimes the temple consisted of a circular only and a porch, like the later development of this form in the roman temple at tivoli, and the mausoleum of hadrian. many etruscan tombs have been found, consist- ing of rock-built and detached structures. some of the rock-built tombs at castel d'asso have beams and rafters cut out of the rock in imitation of wooden construction, and also figures cut out in high relief all around the chambers. great quantities of vessels in pottery and metal-work objects, and also jewellery, have been found in recesses of the walls and roofs of these chambers. the temple of jupiter capitolinus at rome was an etruscan building. the etruscan religion was dark and full of superstition ; their gods were mostly deities of the thunder and lightning and subterranean spirits rather than divinities of comfort and mercy, and the romans adopted most of them in their mythology. the romans having mastered the principle of the arch, made very good use of it. the greater number of their principal buildings were erected in a mixture of the arch and trabeated system. the roman doric and ionic orders were ill-proportioned in their various members, bad in profiling, and also very heavy in appearance. the theatre of marcellus is an example of the former in its lower columns, and the temple of fortuna virilis an example of the latter. the tuscan order is noted for a more elegant develop- ment of the etruscan smooth column, and a great see com fig. .-roman corinthian, entablature, capital, and base of the pantheon. historic ornament. the corinthian order received better treatment at the hands of the romans; some of their buildings are fine examples of this order. some of the roman corinthian capitals are well designed, and have a very grand and imposing effect, as that of the mars ultor (fig. ) and the pantheon. the mars ultor capital is undoubtedly fine and rich in the extreme; that of the pantheon is more restrained ; and in both of them is used the olive-leaf variety of acanthus, each tine or leaflet of which is hollowed out; and thus the whole capital in a full light would have a sparkling effect of light and shade, so that even at a great height and distance from the eye none of the modelling would be lost to sight. the roman corinthian has more mouldings, and has modillions or brackets in the cornice instead of the usual greek dentils (fig. ). the entablature from the temple of jupiter tonans (fig. ) is an example of the inordinate love of over-richness and display that was so characteristic of the romans. the baths of caracalla and of diocletian are the only ones that have remained to us in any state of preservation, and show from the remains what splendid examples of public buildings they must have been. they were built of brick mostly, and lined with stucco on which frescoes were painted. the baths of caracalla, at the foot of the aventine hill, were erected a.d. . they covered a rectangular piece of ground about , feet each way, and were a great assemblage of bath-rooms, public and private, of cold, vapour, and hot baths; swimming and other kinds of bath, gymnasium hall, libraries, reading-rooms, assembly halls, &c., all comprised under the one roof, surrounding the open courtyard in which was the principal swimming bath, in a building ft. by ft. in dimension. in the centre and at the back of this group of buildings was a circular hall, with a domed roof, called the solar cell, the greek and roman architecture. walls of which were lined with brass. some of the finest of roman statuary adorned these halls. the principal hall of the baths of diocletian, erected at the beginning of the fourth century a.d is called the ephebeum, and is still ooo ok de vida ver fig. . --roman corinthian, entablature of jupiter tonans. used as the church of santa maria degli angeli. it is almost ft. long by go ft. wide, and was restored by michelangelo. its roof consists of three great cross vaults supported by eight granite columns, ft. in height. vol. i. s historic ornament. another class of buildings that the romans were fond of was the amphitheatres. remains of them have been found throughout the roman empire, the most stupen- dous of which was the coliseum or flavian amphitheatre. fig. .–bas-relief on the arch of titus. (p. & c.) it was begun by the emperor vespasian and finished by his son titus, and its ruins still attest to its greatness. it is elliptical in plan, is four stories in height; the three lowest are pierced with eighty openings, semi- greek and roman architecture. circular arched, with columns and piers between. the first story is doric, the second ionic, and the third corin- thian. each column and pier is raised on a stylobate, and the columns carry entablatures continuously around the building an almost solid wall is the feature of the fourth story, which has a series of corinthian pilasters, and projecting brackets for carrying the awning poles. the façade is fig. .-jewish candlestick, arch of titus. (p. & c.) built of stone quarried from the neighbouring hills, and the interior portions are built of brick. the dimensions are ft. in length, ft. wide, and ft. in height. double corridors run around the building on each floor, and it had seats for more than , spectators. chariot races, mimic sea-fights, when the arena would be flooded artificially with water, gladiatorial combats, and fights with wild animals and bulls, were among the amusements of the romans that were performed in the amphitheatres. other monuments, such as triumphal columns and toner c t on fig. .-roman composite order, from the arch of titus greek and roman architecture. arches, were erected by the emperors to commemorate their victories, and these were of the most elaborate and rich description. the column of marcus aurelius, known as the antonine column, and the column of trajan set up by that emperor in trajan's forum at romne in commemoration of his victory over the dacians, are the two best known of these commemorative monuments. the latter column has been reproduced, and a cast of it may be seen in the south kensington museum. the original is nearly ft. high, and is richly sculptured with bas-reliefs on marble slabs fastened together in a spiral form around the central structure. the order is doric, the shaft being set up on a large pedestal with very fine sculptures of figures, armour, and inscriptions. the triumphal arches are rectangular masses of masonry with arched openings, sometimes with one arch and some- times three, a large one and two smaller ones, as the arches of constantine and septimus severus ; and some- times smaller ones had piers and pilasters with a lintel entablature instead of an arch, as in the goldsmith's arch in rome. the arch of titus (erected to commemorate the taking of jerusalem a.d. ), which is one of the finest of these monuments, is interesting for two reasons: one is that it has reliefs on it recording the capture of jerusalem, with the representation of the seven-branched golden candlestick of the temple (figs. , ), and the other is that the arch itself is one of the finest examples of the architectural order that was created by the romans—the composite—(fig. ), which is a grafting of the ionic on the corinthian. the decoration of this order is extremely rich in character: the lower half of the capital has the corinthian leaves, while the upper half is almost the whole of the ionic voluted capital added; the cornice has both the ionic dentils and the corinthian modillions. the arch of septimus severus and the baths of diocletian are of the composite order. chapter xiv. greek and roman ornament. greek ornament-as found on the carved mouldings, friezes, acroteria, antifexes, and capitals, or, as in the painted variety, found on vases, plain mouldings, bands, plates, and other surface decorations, or incised on the bronze cista and mirrors—was of a severe and refined order, almost all of which had its birthplace in egyptian and assyrian forms, that in the first instances were used susug julij fig. .-greek frets. in a symbolic sense, but under the hands of greek artists had lost all their former meaning, and were developed and partly transformed into a wealth of purely æsthetic forms. the simplest forms were frets or the so-called key pattern (figs. , , and ). the word meander is sometimes applied to the greek greek and roman ornament. frets; this is not correct, as the word implies a curved line, not a rectangular one. the guilloche, snare-work, or cable ornament, is used fig. .-greek carved fret. on flat bands, and also as the decoration of torus mouldings (figs. and ). the greeks used the honeysuckle pattern in an endless variety of forms both in carving and in painting, examples of which are at figs. and . fig. .-treble guilloche ornament. the ivy was used very much in borders of their painted vases (fig. ). the ogee moulding was usually decorated with the water-leaf and tongue ornament, and the ovolo with the characteristic egg and tongue, and the round fillets with historic ornament. beads and reels. a fine example of this group of deco- rated mouldings comes from the temple of minerva polias at athens (fig ). fig. .—double guilloche. an elongated type of the egg and tongue comes from the erectheum (fig. ). the greeks seldom used large scrolls in ornament; an exception is the scroll ornament from the roof of the ge fig. .-anthemion (carved), from apollo epicurius. lysikrates monument, and in the corinthian cauliculi or volutes (see fig. ). the greek variety of acanthus foliage is seen in the capital from the same monument, greek and roman ornament nament. . roman architectural ornament was simply greek with a few variations, not always improvements. it was less refined, but in some cases, especially in the examples ol jollc fig. .-greek border with fret bands. of large acanthus scrolls on friezes, panels, and pilasters (fig. ), and in their large capitals, the ornament was designed with great skill and virility. they used the fig. .—greek ivy meander border. softer-leaved variety of acanthus—the mollis—while the greeks used the spinosus, or prickly-leaved variety. the decorations of the roman mouldings were less elegant than those of the greeks, owing to the contours being segments of circles where the greeks used forms historic ornament. like conic sections, and the execution was less artistic in the roman mouldings (figs. , , ). the domestic architecture of greece is guessed at by ws fig. .—decorated mouldings from the temple of minerva polias ; ogee ovolo, and beads. uuu walt llavu odlnwl fig. .–the ovolo, with egg and tongue, from the erectheum, the remains of pompeii and herculaneum, which, though roman provincial cities, were in style and decoration a fair reflection of greek art. the remains of the art found lednicu.da... fig. .–ancient roman panel, florence. historic ornament. in these cities have been styled greco-roman. the destruction of pompeii was in the year a.d. . the general arrangement of a roman house was rectangular in plan, with, and sometimes without, a ooon opinin j. . fig. .–ovolo and astragal mouldings; roman. vestibule in front. the front door opened on a passage called the prothyrum which led to the atrium, an open court partly roofed; the opening was in the centre, and was called the impluvium ; exactly under it in the floor was a a.finden. fig. .-ogee and fluted cavetto moulding; jupiter tonans. tank called the compluvium; this received the rain water. in large houses the atrium roof was supported by columns, then the atrium was sometimes called the cavædium, at the end of which opened out three rooms · greek and roman ornament. ! the larger and central one was called the tablinum, and the two side ones ale ; these were the rooms where the family records, documents, histories, deeds, &c., were kept. a passage led from the atrium to the principal private reception-room, called the peristylium, which had a roof partly open to the sky. this room was the finest in the house, and was richly decorated with rare marbles, bronzes, and fresco paintings where the owner was wealthy. round the perisiyle were arranged the smaller rooms, such as the parlours called exedra, the chapels lararia, and the picture galleries pinacothecæ. kitchens and other offices siltinimo wyn pr! fig. .-ogee decorated, and astragal; jupiter stator. were behind, as also were the various sleeping-rooms. some of the rooms were badly lighted, and had to depend for the light from the doors or artificial light, but in some cases windows, rather small in size, were placed high up in the walls. the walls of the pompeian houses were richly decorated in strong colouring, where vermilion, black, green, and orange predominated. the subjects were figure groups, animals, birds, and grotesques of all kinds, encased in fantastic architectural framings (fig. ). sometimes a dead wall of the yard would be painted elaborately to represent a garden. sculpture also decorated the apart- historic ornament. ments, the floors were in mosaic, and the ceiling richly panelled and decorated. roman, greek, and pompeian ka o it tot oooooo wngos ܠ ܘ ܢ fig. .-mural painting from pompeii. ornament will again be noticed in the second volume under the minor arts of these countries. chapter xv. indian art and architecture. an aryan race of people came into india about b.c. across the upper indus. they settled in the first instance in the punjab, in the watershed of the sutlej and the jumna, and finally in oude and the east. after one thou- sand years they lost their purity of race by mixing with the aboriginal natives. about this time the prophet sakya muni, or buddha, arose, and apparently succeeded in converting nearly the whole of northern india to buddhism. he died in b.c. , and three hundred years after his death, or about b.c. , king asoka proclaimed buddhism as the state religion, and for about one thousand years after it con- tinued as the state religion of india, although at the present day there are said to be no native buddhists in india. historic art in india began in asoka's reign. the earlier rock-tombs and other architecture of asoka's time are evidently stone copies of still earlier wooden construc- tions. monuments consisting of edict columns or lats, peculiar to this period, have been found in isolated positions erected to the honour of buddha in the neighbourhood of allahabad and delhi; they are above thirty-three feet in height, and have a curved, inverted, bell-shaped capital on which probably stood a wheel, the emblem, or a lion, the symbol, of buddha. this capital is similar in form to the indian art and architecture. priests, and are sometimes erected alone to the honour of buddha. one of the most important is the sanchi tope in bhopal, central india (fig. ). mr. ferguson, in his “study of indian architecture,” describes this remarkable monument as follows: “it was built probably (the tope) b.c. , the stone railing b.c. , and the gateways a.d. to . the principal part of the building consists of a dome feet in diameter and feet in height. the fence by which this tope is surrounded is extremely curious. it consists of stone posts feet inches in height, and a little more than feet apart, surmounted by a plain archi- trave, and between every two uprights three horizontal cross-pieces of stone are inserted. still more curious are the four stone torans or gateways, one of which—the eastern-is shown at fig. . it con- sists of two square pillars covered with sculptures, and with bold elephant capitals, rising to a height of feet inches. above these are four lintels slightly curved upwards in the centre, and ending in ionic scrolls; they are supported by continuations of the columns, and three uprights are inserted between the lintels. all this construction is covered over with elaborate sculpture, and surmounted by emblems. the total height is feet inches." sir g. birdwood says: “the symbols are the trisula, the wheel, and the lion, representing the buddhistic triad, buddha, the law, and the congregation. the ground plan of the stupas or topes, with the return railings and the projecting doorways or entrances, form a gigantic swastika (“aus- picious ’), the mystic cross (fylfot) of the buddhists." ferguson says the buddhist dagoba is a direct descendant of the sepulchral tumulus of the turanian races, like those found in etruria, lydia, and among the scyths of the northern steppes. it is plainly seen that the details of buddhistic ornament are derived from greek and assyrian sources mixed with buddhist emblems; a few native ideas may be seen in the construction, and in the substituting of the indian elephant vol. i. t historic ornament. on t urikio fi bile fig. .—the sanchi tope, bhopal, central india. for the assyrian or persian bull. a fine cast of the sanchi gateway may be seen in the south kensington museum, historic ornament. temples of the earliest type exhibit a marked imitation of timber construction in almost every detail (fig. ). brahminical architecture has three varieties – the dravidian, which is common to the dakhan, south of the kistna; the chalukyan, between the kistna and the mahanuddi; aad the indo-aryan, which prevails in mo think hn fig. . --temple of biskurma at ellora. hindustan. the dravidian temple is characterized by a horizontal system of storied towers, and has a grand and imposing look of solemnity. examples of dravidian architecture occur in the temples at seringham, tinnevelly, madura, perin, vellore, &c. the chalukyan is distinguished by its star-like plan and pyramidal tower. the great double temple of siva at indian art and architecture. present city of delhi, which city contains the finest examples of the mohammedan style in india. the dewanne khas, or principal hall of the palace of delhi (fig. ), is a very rich and ornate example of this style. it is vaulted like a gothic cathedral and is inlaid throughout with rich marbles and mosaic work. it has a niche inlaid date fig. .-interior of the palace at delhi; seventeenth century. with precious stones in which once stood the famous peacock throne of delhi. the throne was made in enamelled work, in the shape of a peacock with a spread- out tail, and was set with diamonds and precious stones to imitate the natural colours of the peacock. it was carried off by nadir shah at the sacking of delhi, a.d. . around the frieze of one of the halls of this palace runs chapter xvi. chinese and japanese architecture. the architecture of china does not possess what we might call a serious character. founded mainly on buddhistic elements, as far as the more important efforts of their temple architecture is concerned, the only original development that marks the chinese structural design is the pagoda tower—in itself really a buddhistic idea—but the chinese have the credit of carrying it further in their taas or pagodas by placing story upon story until some- times a great height was attained ; as, for example, in the great porcelain tower at nankin, which is feet in height, consists of nine stories, and is feet in diameter at the base. each story diminishes in size, and the concave roof of every lower story is in front of the receding one above. varnished pillars, resting on a deep stone base- ment, support the verandah-like roof of the lowest story, and a fence of gilded trellis-work surrounds the lower half of the pillars. the eaves of the roofs curl upwards and end in points from which bells are suspended. carved dragons peer out from under the rafters, and the whole building, inside and out, as well as the roof tiles, is faced with white porcelain slabs or tiles fastened to the inner brick struc- ture; some parts—the roofs especially-are painted in alternating bands of green, yellow, and red. the greater part of the chinese houses are wooden constructions, and have movable walls of various materials, which slide in framework. the walls do not support the historic ornament. roof, which is, as a rule, supported on posts, independent of them. in the gateways to the confucian temples some attempts at architectural construction are seen, where a column would have a proper capital and a base, and a lintel or arched opening would appear. these pae-lus or trium- phal gates have the usual fantastic curled roofs so peculiar to chinese architecture (fig. ). the genius of the chinese as great builders and engineers is expressed better in their works of public fig. .–gateway of the temple of confucius, shanghai. utility, as in their finely-constructed bridges, their canals, and more particularly in the great wall, built to protect their country from the incursions of the northern hordes, and which is a monument at the same time to their native love of exclusiveness from surrounding nations. the great wall was built about b.c. , is , miles long, to feet in height, feet thick at the base, and slopes upwards to feet in width at the top. it has bastions or towers of defence at intervals, which are feet square at the base, and the wall is carried over hills and chinese and japanese architecture. mountains regardless of all obstacles. their country is a network of canals, some of which are miles in length. notwithstanding all this, they are no further advanced in architecture than they were two thousand years ago, or, indeed, in hardly any of the arts. at the same time the chinese are remarkably skilled in porcelain manufacture, silk weaving, embroidery, colour printing, ivory and jade carving, enamelling, metal-working, casting, and decora- tive painting. their ornament is very conventional and rich in colouring, but their ornamental forms are limited, and their decoration so full of repetition that it becomes very monotonous when judged by a european standard. the architecture of japan differs very slightly from that of china, as it is either an offshoot from the older civilisa- tion of china, or has been derived from the same sources, through the buddhist religion. some changes have occurred in the architecture of japan in recent years owing to the more extended use of stone in their buildings, which has been brought about by their interchange of ideas with western nations. their buddhist temples are similar to the chinese, with their curious turned-up roofs, but the shinto temples are usually covered with roofs that have great projecting eaves, which do not turn up at the angles. the porches or gateways (torii) to the temples are built in stone, but in imitation of their earlier wooden construction; they are of the pillar-and-beam order, and recall somewhat the construction, on a smaller scale, of the “torans" or gate- ways of the sanchi tope in india (fig. ). the japanese carve their wooden rafters, beams, posts, lintels, and stringcourses very skilfully, with conventional ornament, dragons, and grotesque animals. the better class of japanese dwellings are usually of two stories; the lower story has a verandah, and the upper one is recessed back, and is smaller than the lower, which produces a pleasing effect. their walls are, like the chinese, more or less movable partitions. chapter xvii. early christian and byzantine architecture. for the first three centuries after the birth of christ the early christians suffered much persecution and martyr- dom. the new religion was ridiculed and despised, and the converts of the new faith were obliged to hold their meetings and to worship in secret, which they did in the narrow but extensive catacombs in which they secretly buried their dead. the catacombs are found chiefly in the neighbourhood of rome and naples, and are cut in the dark soft tufa stone, in the nature of long passages, wind- ing and doubling in their labyrinthine twistings. some of these passages are so narrow as to barely admit of one person to pass in height or width. in height or width. on either side of these narrow ways are cut out openings just large enough for the bodies of deceased persons to be deposited. the body of the deceased was thus thrust into the narrow tomb, and with it was buried a flask of sacred oil. the entrance was then closed with a stone, on which would be engraved the name or initials of the dead. some of the catacombs were hollowed out in places into lofty and capacious chainbers and niches. these were used as chapels for the early christian worship, the walls and ceilings of which were decorated with paintings of a very primitive character. the more important of these catacombs in which chapel- like rooms are found are those of s. calisto, s. sebastiano, s. lorenzo, and s. agnese, at rome; and at naples those of s. mario della sanita, s. gennara de poveri, and s. maria della vita. christian and byzantine architecture. story, in the walls of which were the windows that lighted the church. in the oldest type of the basilica there was no window in the apse, so this portion of the church was bathed in a mysterious twilight, adding a poetic charm to the gold mosaics with which the roof of the apse was decorated. sometimes windows were introduced into the low walls of the aisles; the aisles were covered with shed like wooden roofs, which were supported on trussed frame- work. sometimes the trusses were ceiled, and on the ceilings were painted scriptural subjects. the wall spaces of the second story in the nave were also occupied with painting's of sacred subjects. the floor of the apse was nd raised higher than that of the nave, and was ap- proached by steps; seats were placed around the wall of the apse for the priests, and in the centre was the elevated throne for the bishops. a portion of the nave space was sometimes appropriated for the choir, screened off by a marble structure, and at either end of the choir were placed the “ ambos” or pulpits (fig. fig. .-ambo or pulpit from st. george's at salonica. ). the altar was in the centre of the apse, generally over the tomb of a christian martyr, and underneath all, or sometimes a portion only of the church, was the crypt. the nave usually had three entrance doors, and the aisles one or more each. as the heathen religions, and consequently the ancient temples, fell into disuse, there historic ornament. was plenty of building materials ready formed and dressed, which the architects of the new buildings appropriated for their own purposes in the erection of the basilicas. this accounts for the great number of roman corinthian and ionic columns found in the buildings of the early christian architecture, and we often find that when an ancient column was too short, it was simply raised on a higher base, and if too long it was cut down to fit its new position. it was generally in the later basilicas that this occurred, as might be expected, for the earlier basilicas are richer and better decorated in their beautiful details, seeing that the early christian builders had the first choice of the rich orna- mental work of architectural sculpture that had belonged to the ancient roman temples. the church of s. apolli- nare in classe at ravenna may be cited as one of the most finished and most beautiful of the early basilicas, which was erected with much of this old material. although the christian architects and artists were slow in producing new forms of plastic art, as long as they could adapt the existing fragments of architectural sculpture to their uses; on the other hand, the art of painting and decorating by mosaic pictures on the great spaces of the walls and ceilings of the basilicas was developed to a high degree of monumental splendour, and brilliant effects were gained by the use of gold and bright colours. mosaics as wall decoration in the basilicas were sug- gested by the paintings in the catacombs. these primitive paintings were borrowed in their form and essence from ancient mythological works. at first, some of the earliest efforts at decoration in the catacombs consisted merely of monograms and symbols, such as the greek letters alpha and omega, and the initials or monogram of christ. the use of these doubtless arose from the desire to de- precate anything that savoured of the images of heathen- dom, but evidently the early christians soon arrived at the idea that painting might be admissible in a church where sculptured images could not be tolerated the latter re- historic ornament, jects, after the manner of the roman consular diptychs. these ivory carvings, that exhibit a true spirit of the antique in their design, are not to be confounded with the later byzantine diptychs that were executed in a more archaic style. during the fifth century, and even in the latter part of the fourth, we see the more cheerful spirit of the antique mov g odo fig. .—wall painting from the catacombs of s. calixtus. character dying out, and the art of the time exhibits a greater importance and attention which is given to large masses, while smaller or minor surfaces are left empty, and decorative detail suppressed. there is an apparent striving to render the figure of the redeemer—the chief personage -larger and more important in the scale of the decoration, and at the same time to give him more individuality. as the technical qualities of the christian art diminished, the christian and byzantine architecture. majesty and sublimity of the great teacher was expressed in a more spiritual conception of his divinity. several examples of decoration illustrating this phase of christian art occur in the wall paintings in the catacombs of s. ponziano at rome. the face of christ in these repre- sentations is full of earnest and mild serenity; the right hand is raised as if in blessing, and the left holds the book of life. in the fourth century, mosaic was used in the basilicas as a means of decorating the apse and walls, as the romans before had used it in their floors and dados. in the hands of the early and inexperienced artists, the character of the material in mosaic had a great deal to do, but not all, in the creating of the type of angular and rigid forms of the figures, which was transmitted to all subse- quent christian mosaics. at the same time there was the intense desire to make the figures of christ and of other sacred personages of a sorrowful and austere character. we can, however, trace in these figures the magisterial dignity that invests the sculptured figures of the emperors and senators of roman art. in italy, the christian mosaics assumed more and more v a decided breaking away from the traditions of the antique. large masses as single figures were symmetrically arranged, ornamental details were suppressed, and bands with inscriptions framed the large spaces of the walls and the apse. the figures were more isolated, attenuated, severe of expression, and leaving much to be desired in their anatomical construction or in the natural movement of the body; but all this tended to give them that ex- pression of devotional simplicity aimed for by those early mystics, who only looked on the world as a “vale of tears.” in the vaulted roof of the funeral chapel erected to the memory of the daughter of constantine at rome- sta. costanza-some of the earliest mosaic work is to be found, consisting of an antique treatment of the vine and tendrils used in a symbolic sense; and in another chapel, christian and byzantine architecture. form of early christian architecture was developed, called a “baptistery,” which generally took the form of a detached building, with a circular or polygonal plan. in some cases the baptistery adjoins the atrium of the basilica, but often is a detached building of considerable impor- tance. the structure is supposed to have been suggested by the circular portion of the roman haths, and consists fig. .—opus alexandrinum pavement, san marco, rome. of a circular row of columns supporting the upper struc- ture; the central portion is surrounded by a low cloister- like aisle, and the fountain is in the middle of the building. the circular building known as the church of santa costanza in rome—the funeral chapel before men- tioned--the octagonal baptistery of constantine, and the fine baptistery at ravenna, are examples of this kind of historic ornament. building. another beautiful example is the octagonal baptistery of the lateran, belonging to the fifth century; it has eight large antique columns, which support an archi- trave, upon which rest another series of eight smaller columns, carrying another architrave and the domed roof. the whole building has a pleasant and agreeable effect of extreme airiness. byzantine architecture. the ancient town of byzantium, the modern constanti- nople, was mostly in ruins when constantine the great selected it for the new capital of the roman empire. he rebuilt the old town and named it after himself, and in the year a.d. the inauguration of the new capital was cele- brated. later on, under theodosius, the roman empire was divided, and constantinople became the capital of the eastern portion. it was the great connecting-point between the countries. of the east and the west. the inhabitants of the new city being mostly greeks, the native artists and architects employed by constantine imparted a decided grecian character to the ornament and decoration, especially of the churches and other buildings that were erected by this emperor. the occasion of the new political change and the rapid spread of the christian religion served to give a great impetus to the building and lavish decoration of churches and public edifices. although the new architecture was founded on the roman originals, yet in the hands of the greeks both architecture and ornament assumed a new and original character. from the time of the founding of con- stantinople to the date of justinian's reign (a.d. - ), when the great church of santa sophia—holy wisdom- was built, on the ruins of an older church that was said to have been burnt down, we can guess that it must have been a time of experiments and developments from the christian and byzantine architecture. basilica type of building to the well-defined domed style of architecture known as the byzantine. the timber-roofed and vaulted style of structure now gave place to the dome, which resulted also in a change of the plan to the square form, instead of the rectangle. during the two hundred years previous to the building of santa sophia, the problem of dome construction, with others of a difficult nature in building, had been success- fully solved by the greek architects of the eastern empire. justinian employed the greeks, anthemius of thralles and isidorus of miletus, as the architects of santa sophia,y and they succeeded in erecting a marvellous structure fue that may justly be reckoned as one of the wonders of the world. four vast piers, arrangeá on a square plan, support four solid arches of masonry, semicircular in shape, and feet span each. the four triangular spaces at the corners and the spaces formed by the angles, the semicircular arches and portions of the ring of the dome, are filled with “pendentives,” which may be described as continuations of the dome. these pendentives partly support the dome, and the other points of support are on the backs of the great arches. the four pendentives meet in the circular ring from which the dome springs. the dome is feet) in height from the level of its base, and feet in dia- meter, and is rather fiattish in shape. on the side of the dome, east and west, are two half- domes, which crown apsidal walls. other small apses are domed over at lower levels, and vaulted aisles of two stories run round the higher portions of the building, the whole forming almost a cube-like shape. after constantinople was captured by the turks (a.d. ), santa sophia was converted into a mosque and four minarets, or moslem towers, were added to its outer angles. the interior of this church, besides the stupendous effect of its unrivalled architectural construction, has its added beauties and splendour in its inlaid marbles, its richly historic ornament. carved cornices and arcades (fig. ), and its vaults and domes glittering with gold mosaics of cherubim, and dignified though gaunt and archaic figures. in the capitals of the columns was used the sharply-edged and undercut acanthus foliage, more in accordance with the old greek type than the roman, but have a distinctly byzantine character of its own. sacred signs, emblems, and birds were often introduced into the capitals; the general shape of the latter was a cubical form, the four oo suun mummuu fig. .—corni from santa sophia. faces slanting inwards from above, this form giving a de- cided appearance of great supporting and sustaining power (figs. and ). sometimes they were bossed out, and often contained the elements of the ionic and corin- thian orders (figs. , , ). the wedge-shaped portion on the top of the capital is an ugly but distinctive feature of the byzantine style (fig. ). the splendour and magnificence of the decoration in byzantine churches is proverbial: the columns were often of christian and byzantine architecture. porphyry and serpentine marble, and the supports to the altar canopy (baldacchino), the screen (iconostasis) and the pulpit cd gitron fig. .–capital from santa sophia, showing the bossing-out of the ornament. be fig. .-- capital from st. demetrius at salonica. fig. .- capital from st. demetrius. (ambo) were often inlaid with gold, silver, and precious stones. the altar itself was a gorgeous piece of workmanship, christian and byzantine architecture. by the early christians, and so painting which led to the mosaic picture, which in its turn led to enamelling on metals, was favoured to a great extent by the byzantine artists. even flat bands with inscriptions and ornament were used instead of mouldings in relief. the city of ravenna being situated between constan- tinople and rome possessed some remarkable buildings, that do not belong exactly to the eastern or western type of architecture ; but on the other hand have strongly marked in- fluences of each. the most important is that of the church of st. vitale; it is octagonal in plan, and is like santa sophia in having a prin- cipal central dome, half-domes, and vaulted aisles. it is re- splendent in elaborate decora- tion and carvings. the cathe- dral of st. mark's at venice is so well known from illustrations and photographs that it re- quires very little description. it was built in the years a.d. — , and its plans are said to have been drawn by greek architects at constanti- fig. .-st. nicholas at moscow. nople. originally it possessed all the features of a genuine byzantine edifice, but has been altered externally, and in some places internally in both gothic and renaissance periods. the byzantine domes have had bulbous coverings placed over them in later times. st. mark's like santa sophia is square in plan, but has five principal domes, one in the centre, and one at each angle or end of the greek cross plan. the aisles, with their series of low-level dome roofs, make the whole historic ornament. building nearly square. the surrounding countries of bulgaria, servia, roumania, armenia, and russia, which embraced the christian religion of the greek church, pos- sess examples of byzantine architecture. the russian type in its later developments has distinctive character- istics of its own, particularly in the use and shape of the dome. russian churches consist usually of a storied tower on which is placed five sınall domes of a bulbous shape; these are built on the tops of elongated drums. the bulbous tops of the domes grow into points, on which are placed tall crosses. these and other fantastic ele- ments are derived from the timber edifices of persia and other asiatic countries (fig. ). chapter xviii. saracenic architecture and ornament. the architecture of the saracens in its most perfect examples has a thoroughly distinctive style of its own, and their ornament in its pure form is unlike the ornament of any style that has hitherto existed. the originality of the latter arose from the experiment- ing in ornamental patterns that should have no likeness to plants, animals, or other natural forms. this prohibition of the use of objects from nature in their ornament was one of the articles of the moslem religion; but to get any pleasing variety in ornament and leave out all natural reminiscences in the designs is out of human power, so consequently we have, even in saracenic ornament, natural forms put through a geometrical pro- cess of draughtsmanship. saracenic ornament in what is sometimes called arabian has leaf and bud-like forms interlaced with strap-work, which is often very beautiful and is known under the name of “arabesque" (figs. + , ). the saracens were originally composed of arab herds- men, nomadic wanderers of the desert, carriers or mer- chants, and dwellers in villages, who cultivated the land around them. the earliest building of any importance that can be called saracenic is the “ kaaba or moslem temple at mecca, which contained the sacred brownish- black stone placed by mahomet in the south-east angle of this square temple. this black stone is supposed to be a meteorolite, hemispherical in shape, and about by historic ornament. inches in the widest dimension. some hundreds of stone images or “gods” used to be worshipped at mecca by the mohammedans in their early days, or in what they call their « “ days of ignorance," but these were destroyed by the prophet's orders. mohammed himself was a fanatic that could neither read nor write; he made up the korân from many sources, such as the bible, the apocryphal dla fig. .-arabesque ornament from the wekāla of kāit bey. (l.-p.) gospels, the talmud, and possibly a good many original passages of his own, which he says he received from the mouth of the angel gabriel in visions. the mohammedan creed contains its essence in the words “ there is no god, but god, and mohammed is his prophet.” this text is found very frequently as a decorative legend on the walls of the mosques and on painted tiles. at first mohammed's new religion was not favourably received, historic ornament. when they became convinced that islâm was to conquer the whole world by the sword. his army, however, was nearly annihilated by the byzantine emperor, heraclius, in a battle at muta, but he recovered himself, and marched on to mecca, where he put to the sword all those that did not embrace his religion, and destroyed all the remaining idols in the city. he allowed his army all the plunder they could get, after he had a tithe to himself, but it is said that he led a very abstemious life, dressed poorly, and resided with his wives in the shabbiest type of dwellings. he died in a.d. , or ten years after the hegira, from which event is dated the mohammedan era. after his death many of the converts became backsliders, but his successor, abu-bekr, and more especially the renowned omar—the second caliph-brought the saracens to a great power. they were very warlike, and capable of enduring great hardships, and as they had everything to gain and nothing to lose, they made war their sole trade, and car- ried their successful arms to india, persia, mesopotamia, syria, palestine, and egypt. the islands of the mediterranean, the northern coast of africa, spain, and the south-east of france, were by them also invaded, ravaged, and partly conquered. in the youthful days of saracenic power, as early as the second caliphate, persia and asia minor had been plun- dered and pillaged of their costly and valuable objects in silver, gold, embroidered carpets, and silken goods. the wealth of the moslem conquerors was now considerable, and was accumulating fast; the sight of so much that was fine and striking in the arts and architecture of the coun- tries they had conquered, in the eyes of these people—who were no better than barbarians or banditti-began to have a more civilising effect on them. add to this the influence of the byzantine architecture, especially at constantinople, with the saracens, whose religion was in some respects not unlike the christian, especially as in both cases there was the stern prohibition of idols or graven images; and saracenic architecture and ornament. e ccccc awe all cecg fig. .--alhambra diaper, superposed ornament. so it was quite natural that the moslem mosque should be built and decorated on the main lines of the byzantine christian church. the dome and the niche (mehrab) came vol. i. Х historic ornament. as from the byzantine; the minarets—which are not strictly essential in moslem architecture-probably from the per- seopolitan columns. the moslem dome, however, may have had its origin in the domed palaces of persia, of the achæmedian dynasty. saracenic ornament is mostly, however, derived from the geo- metric byzantine with a strong dash of indian forms in its mix- ture. the super-posing in their ornament of different planes (fig. ), the class of ornament known “mnemonic" (figs, , ), fig. .–stalactite vaulting. and the stalactite decoration of vaults and domes (fig. )-all these three classes deserve the credit of being distinctly saracenic, although some say that the stalactite ornament was known in persia before the days of mahomet. among the earliest mosques we may mention that of omar at jerusalem, which was supposed to be a small wooden mosque, now destroyed. ferguson says it was the mosque of el aksah. the mosque of 'amr at old cairo was built a.d. by amru-ibn al-aās, the general and governor who con- quered egypt, a.h. (after the hegira). it has been frequently restored and enlarged. the columns which support the arcaded arches are classical in character, the arches are slightly horseshoe in the curve, and are tied together. the building is nearly square in plan (figs. , ). the mosque of ibn-tūlūn (son of tūlūn) in old cairo was built by ahmad ibn-tülin, founder of the house of the tūlūn governors of egypt, a.h. - . this mosque and that of 'amr are what are known as cloistered mosques. the plan of the latter (fig. ) gives a general idea of a cloistered mosque. the essential requirements of a mosque are very few and simple. mahomet's mosque at medina was a small square brick-built structure, with a saracenic architecture and ornament. r *** fig. .—east colonnade of the mosque of 'amr. (l.-p.) historic ornament. wooden roof plastered over: the chief thing required was retirement from the public for meditation and prayer. it was not essential that all the rectangular or square court that forms the mosque should be covered with a roof, provided there was sufficient shelter for the number of worshippers, which was generally small at a time, and if :: ::::: *......: which:mm::::: :::: ::: : open n . ::.......... w- f -e ...::.. i . ul.:::: kibleh . orthimi dikkeh mimbar the two test columus court. ..:.:: entrance . ... lil: y............................. t!!::::.........:: ::: ::: ... .... :::: ::::::::::::....:::::..::: .... : .:: ..:::: :::: :::.c.:: fig. .—plan of the mosque of ‘amr. (l.-p.) a larger space were required, a portion or all of the open court could be roofed in. what we would call the east end of a church corresponded to that part of a mosque where the kibla, or line of direction, would be indicated- towards mecca—there the mihrab or niche would be fixed. close to the mihrab is the mimbar, or pulpit, for the sermon, and in close vicinity the dikka or tribune, a raised saracenic architecture and ornamĖnt. nuo kikuu um platform, from which the imām intones the prayers and reads passages from the korān. the minaret is a later addition, but is seen on every mosque; it is used by the muezzin, who ascends to its galleries and calls 'the faithful to prayer five times a day (fig. ). a fountain is necessary for the lawful ablutions before prayer. the dome is not a necessary feature to a mosque; it only occurs over the tomb of some sultan or other digni- tary, and may be used as a chapel, but only when it covers a tomb. the majority of mosques, however, have a dome, either as a principal feature, or attached to some part of the build- ing. cairo is particularly rich in domed mausoleum structures (fig. ). the domes or cupolas in moslem fig. .–minaret of buildings generally swell up beyond the mosque of kaloum at cairo. the semicircle, and are raised con- siderably by having their lower parts straight-sided or cylindrical ; this part is sometimes pierced with a row of small windows, and is recessed back on a pyramid-like story, with a square or polygonal base, which in its turn rests on the top of a square embattled tower. the dome is usually built of brick, the courses projecting roughly one fig. .—mausoleum over the other, diminishing towards at cairo. the top, and thickly plastered over inside and out to get an even surface; sometimes the mortar is thicker than the bricks in saracen buildings. מפרח historic ornament fig. . – mosque of kāit bey, cairo. (l.-p.) wooden frames are often used in the construction of domes which support the plaster work. some domes are saracenic architecture and ornament. built with slabs of stones on which a geometric pattern is carved on the outside (figs. , ); these are generally of a late period, as the tomb mosque of kāit bey, built about a.d. (fig. ). the oldest mosque in cairo is that of ibn tūlūn (fig. ). it is a cloistered mosque, is built in a massive style, and has a high plain wall around it; it covers about four hundred square feet of ground. in the centre of the inner courtyard is a square stone building surmounted by a dome, one of the earliest carried on stalactites. this building is a century later than the cloisters, and is built over a well or fountain. the great court is surrounded by arcades of pointed arches, that have a slight tendency to turn inwards at the base, and are built as piers of plastered brick; it is said to be the first mosque built on piers, instead of the usual round columns. the saracens did not make columns themselves, but took them from the ruins of roman buildings, or even from existing christian churches, and as often as not used the capitals turned upside down as bases. the saracens have a form of capital of moorish design which harmonizes with their architecture; it has a slightly tapering, smooth, long neck, a heavy projecting head, and is well covered with characteristic foliated work (fig. ). in the mosque of ibn-tūlūn there are only two columns; these are placed at the niche or mihrab. three sides of this mosque have two rows of arches, and the fourth-the side towards mecca—which is the liwān or sanctuary, has five. the architect of this mosque was a coptic christian, who received £ , and a costly dress of honour as his fee. the total cost of the building was , , (lane- poole). around the arches and the windows, which were placed high up between the arches, are bands of palmated ornament. these borders, according to mr. stanley lane- poole, are the earliest examples of geometrical design and scroll-work that afterwards became so characteristic of saracenic ornament. historic ornament. they were made in plaster or stucco-work by hand, while the plaster was wet, and not cast in moulds, which was the case of later moorish plaster ornament. muutusmusic ooc pogba fig. .-- arcades in the mosque of ibn-tūlūn. (l.-p.) the arcades were roofed over with sycamore planks resting on heavy beams, and the whole structure was crowned with crenellations or embattlements. one of the saracenic architecture and ornament. al fig. .--pulpit of the sultan kāit bey: fifteenth century. (l.-p) historic ornament. plentiful—at least, of any examples of the best period of the saracen style. the main idea in the design of the awag fig. .-a street in cairo. (l.-p.) houses was to have them built so that people outside should see as little as possible of the inmates or inside, and that the women especially should see as little of street historic ornament. liarly arabian in design. it is composed of many pieces of turned and carved pieces that are ingeniously fitted into each other to form the pattern (figs. - - ). in the fig. .-lattice-work, s.k.m. (l.-p.) museum at kensington many examples of these lattice patterns may be seen, and also some of the meshrebiyas. in the illustration of a “street in cairo” (fig. ), two fig. .—lattice-work, s.k.m. (l.-p.) of these meshrebiyas project on brackets from a house front. a richer style of the lattice-work decoration was used saracenic architecture and ornament. in open panels and balustrades of the pulpits, where the triangles and hexagons that form part of the design are carved on the surface, and inlaid back and front with ivory or ebony. the houses in cairo of the purest saracen style have the best part of the carvings and decoration in the inside ; they are generally two or three stories in height, but were much higher in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. the lower parts are built of stone, and the upper stories of brick and wood, plastered white. the lower story has the stones coloured in alternate courses of red ochre and white limewash. the doorways are sometimes decorated by having peculiar voussoirs and interlaced ornament (fig. ). there is an illustration of a shop-front in m. bourgoin's “eléments de l'art arabe” which is an exquisite ex- ample of saracen work of good proportion and design in its doors and windows. saracenic ornament, as it appears in plaster, stone, wood, and mosaic decoration, of the mosques, pulpits, and wekālas or khans, deserves special notice on account of its extreme originality of design and treatment, inasmuch as, whatever may be its true origin, we must certainly admit that there is a marked difference between it and the ornament of any other historic style. the mosques built anterior to that of suyurghatmish (a.d. ) were decorated in plaster. the rosette (fig. ) shows a transitional piece of work of great beauty, that looks like a copy in stone of low-relief plaster-work, and has every sign of a byzantine-like origin, seen more especially in the leaf-like markings and general treatment of the six large central fowers; the interlacing and other details are also byzantine. it is quite likely that this example was designed by a christian coptic artist, as, indeed, nearly all the saracen art in egypt of this period was designed by coptic egyptians. compare with this the illuminated korān of the sultan sha' ban, of a year or two later (a.d. ). all the floral work in this is historic ornament. distinctly persian in character, without any reminiscence of byzantine, but shows rather a chinese or indian in- fluence (fig. ). it is probably copied from a persian embroidery. another example of saracenic ornament is the stone fig. .-doorway of a private house. (l.-p.) sculptured decoration from the portal of the mosque of sultan hasan, in cairo (a.d. ), (fig. ). from being carved in stone the ornament is much stiffer than the two previous examples, but it is more thoroughly sara- saracenic architecture and ornament. i cenic or arabian than either of them; the large flower- like forms in elevation are evidently developments of the odpole oooo qoderosos cortech fig. .—illuminated korān of the sultan sha' ban; fourteenth century. (l.-p.) assyrian form of the lotus, and have here almost the form of the fleur-de-lis. this type of design was successfully vol. i. y •ueses urins jo period əy wo.j juəweu – € ! ว่าหาทนา / al, : . .lollecti๕เห็น: ไม่ , :/ / | _ - r: : : : : : : : : lliะ ปีเป็น พ เd” huirin เทโibuilแพรนวทางเหt bs uramitrategiture saracenic architecture and ornament. developed in the moresque diapers of the alhambra, where the conventional leaves and flower forms were mixed with saracenic inscriptions, and were redeemed from their aridity by the almost sensuous character of the colouring, which has a combination of red, blue, white, and gold, and further by the superimposed planes of the ornamental fig. .- kufic writing, from the alhambra. composition (see fig. ). it may be noticed that some of the leaf-work in these diapers have a feather-like decoration, which gives richness and variety to the orna- ment: these markings are evidently derived from the parallel veining of byzantine acanthus leaf-work. the larger strap-work running through is interlaced in the form fig. .- arabian cursive writing, from the alhambra. of pointed and horseshoe arches, which makes the orna- ment in appropriate harmony with the moorish architec- ture, while the flat treatment of the whole is distinctively characteristic of all saracenic ornament. two examples of mnemonic ornament are given at figs. and . the former is a kufic inscription historic ornament. arranged so as to form a band ornament. this is in the angular and older form of writing. the latter is an example of the cursive arabian hand which was more generally adopted, and is termed the vaskhy : it is more round and flowing than the kufic. the typical feather ornament forms a background to most of these inscrip- tions. some of the finest specimens of purely saracenic orna- ment are found on the singularly ornate mimbars or pulpits (figs. and ). the simplicity of their straight-lined silhouettes is in restrained contrast to the extreme elaboration of their carved surfaces. the stone pulpit from the mosque of barkuk is early fifteenth cen- tury work. it is made of solid stone slabs, with doorway, staircase, and canopy raised on small pillars and sur- mounted by the usual pear-shaped cupola. the stone slabs are elaborately carved with geometrical patterns, arabesques, and inscriptions, and are said to be the finest examples of stone carving in cairo. another pulpit (fig. ) of the fifteenth century, made by order of the sultan kāit bey, is built in wood; it is now in the south ken- sington museum, and bears the name of this mamlūk sultan, who was the ruler of egypt at the end of that century. the folding doors and the niche of this pulpit are decorated with stalactite ornament; the cupola is copper; the carving is most elaborate, and is also inlaid with ebony and ivory. some of the carved panels from the building known as the wekāla or khan of kāit bey, show saracenic ornament in its purest form-both the geome- trical variety and arabesques. this sultan and his artists have shown the most refined taste of all the great saracen builders. the wekāla or khan is a rectangular building with an open court in the centre, and consists of numerous chambers that were occupied by merchants for a short season when they came to buy and sell in cairo, and was, in fact, a sort of eastern hotel. the stabling was placed behina on the ground floor, and saracenic architecture and ornament. fig. .--stone pulpit in mosque of barkuk; fifteenth century. historic ornament. go fig. .-ornament on an arch of the wekāla kāit bey. (l.-p.) the exterior consisted of a row of small shops. the wekāla of kāit bey had thirteen of these shops on one exterior, and between the seventh and eighth was placed a splendid arched gateway. it is a pointed arch of eight feet in width, the edge of which is decorated with three tiers of stalactites that are carved on the sides of the archway, and has a fine band of carved scroll - work running round the face of the archway and spandrels. one of the most beautiful examples of alter- nating interlacing and ara- besque ornament is that which forms an arch over a horizontal panel of carved ornament. this arch is shown at fig. . a fine characteristic piece of carved ornament from the same building is the subject of the illustration fig. . figure and animal repre. sentation, though prohibited by the moslem religion, was in many cases practised by the saracen sculptors; for instance, in the baptistery of st. louis is a large copper bowl inlaid with silver figures (mosil work made at mosil in the thirteenth century. saracenic architecture and ornament. these figure and animal designs are from mesopotamian sources, as may easily be seen in the examples given- from the maristan of kalaun (figs. and ), where on the last a centaur is shooting an arrow at a unicorn, balanced by a similar animal on the opposite side; and on the other example is a peacock in the centre, with figures of men on either side having drinking vessels and musical instruments, an evident representation of a concert and dances. the scroll borders around this panel, and the execution of the work, are in the saracenic manner, but the motives of the designs are persian. other similar carvings in which animals figure and birds are introduced are to be seen in the same building, and are of late thirteenth cen- tury work. these illustrations are taken from mr. stanley lane-poole's “ saracenic art in egypt,” after “prisse d'avennes," to which the student is referred for an exhaus- tive account of the saracen art in egypt. we extract the following summary of this art from the above author, who quotes from franz pasha, the architect to the govern- ment of the khedive. “ while bestowing their full meed of praise on the wonderfully rich ornamentation and other details of arabian architecture, one cannot help feeling that the style fails to give entire æsthetic satisfaction; want of symmetry of plan, poverty of articulation, insufficiency of plastic decoration, and an incongruous mingling of wood and stone are the imperfections which strike most northern critics. the architects, in fact, bestowed the whole of their attention on the decoration of surfaces; and down to the present day the arabian artists have always displayed far greater ability in designing the most complicated orna- ment and geometrical figures on plane surfaces than in the treatment and proportioning of masses. although we occasionally see difficulties of construction well overcome these instances seem rather to be successful experi- ments than the result of scientific workmanship. the real excellence of the arabian architects lay in their skill saracenic architecture and ornament. in masking abrupt angles by the use of stalactites, or brackets," &c. this architect is right, generally speaking, in his admir- able remarks, but we think, although it is admitted that saracenic architecture lacks the cohesion and unity of parts that is the chief beauty in greek and best examples of the gothic, that in some instances, in the mosques and more particularly in the wekālas and in domestic archi- tecture, the saracen architects have proved themselves masters in the creation of architectural works second to none in point of beauty, while in their architectural appli- cation of ornament to the decoration of the various sur- faces and other features of their buildings they are un- rivalled. they have not only invented a new style of ornament, but in their correct application of it they have scarcely ever been equalled. the decoration of surfaces, which is the chief glory of all saracenic art and architecture, was the first and last lesson they learnt from their persian masters in art, for persian art, like the manners and customs of the people, has all its beauty and politeness on the surface. chapter xix. romanesque architecture and ornament. romanesque is the name given to the architectural style developed by the western barbarians who overran the roman empire, after their partial civilisation, when they had learned the art of building. the style arose chiefly from the copying of roman buildings and their remains, with some added features of byzantine buildings. out of this romanesque, in its turn, there sprang another style which was founded on the romanesque and on the architecture of the saracens. towards the end of the eleventh century the new masters of the roman empire, in the course of their military expeditions to asia minor, syria, and palestine, were brought in contact with the saracens and their architecture, and in coming back to europe they brought with them new ideas of building, such as the pointed arch of the saracens, which feature together with new forms of ornament were added by them to the prevalent romanesque style, the mixture producing an entirely new style, which has been curiously named after the early northern barbarians—the gothic. the subsequent crusades against the mohammedans had the effect, among others, of extending the knowledge of mathematics and geometry among the crusaders, sciences in which the saracens excelled; and in coming home again to the west, they applied their geometrical knowledge to the development of gothic architecture to such an extent that, towards the end of the fourteenth century, this archi- tecture could show examples of the most lofty and daring romanesque architecture and ornament. constructions in stone that were marvels in the science of building. some gothic buildings present with their fretted pinnacles, spires, flying buttresses, intersecting and pierced work, in flamboyant tracery, daring vaulting, and inter- penetrating mouldings, a worked-out solution of some intricate mathematical problem. in its complicated phases gothic construction is more scientific than artistic, how- ever much one may admire the grouping or design of the gothic pile as a picturesque conception. returning to the romanesque style, we find that in the sixth century theodoric the ostrogoth had, in the erec- tions of churches, palaces, and of his tomb in ravenna- his capital-sown the first seeds of the future develop- ments of the german romanesque, and in some degree of the later german gothic style. in producing these works his ambition was to emulate the grandeur of imperial rome. the longobards, the successors of the ostro- goths, continued this building activity through the middle ages, and have left to us monuments their genius in the early and rude duomo vecchio of brescia, and amongst many others of their noblest works were sant' ambrogio at milan, and san zeno at verona. prior to the carlovingian era, the germanic people began to cultivate the fine arts in a tentative manner. this was brought about by the contact of german chiefs and warriors with italian pomp and splendour, which also bred in them a love for personal adornment, that strongly marked the nobles and warriors of this period. charlemagne was crowned emperor of germany at rome, on christmas day in the year a.d. . the dream and ambition of this great german prince was to establish a mighty christian empire in the west of europe that should rival pagan rome itself, not only in military power, but in a widespread culture of literature, science, and artistic excellence. these were the days of chivalry, of the crusaders; the days when men were rich in high and lofty ideals; when historic ornament. those knightly mystics, wolfram von eschenbach and vogelweide, sang of the parsival and the quest of the holy graal, of songs of love and chivalry, of deliverance from wrongs, and of many stirring and tuneful themes. though charlemagne never learned to read or write, he thoroughly appreciated the value of learning. he gathered together learned men, architects, and artists, and established a school of religious music. he built many churches, palaces, and bridges, and collected many statues from rome and elsewhere for the adornment of his great church at aix-la-chapelle; he organized and encouraged the professions and trades of his towns and cities. the great tomb-church at aix-la-chapelle-or aachen was built by charlemagne, and became the prototype of all subsequent churches erected in the romanesque style in germany. it was in the region bordering on the rhine that the great church building activity was developed in germany. the cities of the powerful bishoprics rivalled each other in pomp and splendour, as we see in such buildings as the doms of spiers, mayence, and cologne, and in the roman- esque churches of swabia, franconia, westphalia, and lower saxony. the romanesque style is also found in the churches or doms of bamberg, brunswick, and osna- bruck; the godehardi and michael's churches at hildes- heim, the carving in which excels that in the churches of the rhineland. the distinctive characteristics of the german roman- esque are the great octagonal dome-like towers that arise from the crossing of the nave and transept, and the flank- ing towers at each end that are sometimes united to the central tower by an outside western gallery or façade. a fine modern church, built in the romanesque style, is that of the cathedral of fourvière, on the hill overlooking the city of lyons in france. some german romanesque churches have a western as well as an eastern apse, and the church known as the romanesque architecture and ornament. apostelkirche in cologne has the transept, both of which features are disturbing elements in any church where the chief attention should be directed to the culminating point . fig. .-round arch frieze. fig. .-intersecting blind arcade where the choir, reredos, or altar are usually found in the apse or chancel, and at the eastern end only. the church architecture of the west—the romanesque aaaaa fig. .-rose window. followed closely the requirements of the western ritual, while the churches which observed the eastern ritual kept to the greek or byzantine models. romanesque churches of the tenth century are distin- + historic ornament. guished by the basilica plan, the apsidal east end, round- headed arches, and single or double-light windows. the walls have generally a decoration, consisting of a series of flat pilasters—reminiscences of classic architecture, and the roofs in many cases were vaulted. arcaded deco- ration, with or without small columnar supports (figs. and ) and rose windows (fig. ) are features of the con un lumi .cube fig. .-porch of the heilsbronn monastery, near nüremberg. romanesque. some of the round-headed doorways are especially rich in character, and have often five or six recessed columns (fig. ) that carry richly inoulded heads, and carved capitals of quaint animal and bird deco- ration (fig. ). the shafts of the columns are usually plain, though in some instances, for the sake of contrast, they are twisted romanesque architecture and ornament. or imbricated, and the bases are copies of the classic orders (fig. ). above the lintel and under the round arch mouldings is the lunette or tympanum; this space truir luces fig. .- romanesque shaft and base. fig. .-capital from wartburg. often has rich decoration of figures and ornament; some- times it is divided into two spaces, when the entrance doorway is divided by a central pillar. vo al fig. .-roof cornice of church at alstadt-rottweil. fig. .-later romanesque ornament. the details and motives of romanesque decoration are derived from classic ornament-mostly roman-and are, as a rule, debased forms of the latter. historic ornament. romanesque architecture, and especially its decorative ornamentation, was never quite free from byzantine or fig. .-capital from palace of barbarossa, gelnhausen. saracenic influences. it was of itself an incongruous mixture, out of which, when the pointed arch of the sara- cens was adopted, and the ornamental features modified to conform with it, the new ogival or gothic style arose. in every part of europe in which the romanesque took root, there may be noticed so many distinct varieties. the vuur style in rome and central italy naturally followed, as we have seen, the antique roman forms. in the cathe- dral of pisa the capitals are fig. .-capital from st. cross, winchester. corinthian, and there is a greater display here of mo- saics and coloured marbles, both on the exterior and in the interior, than in most romanesque buildings. romanesque architecture and ornament. the style in lombardy and upper italy is, on the other hand, different to that of central italy, as it there inherited the german traditions. the columns had in their capitals leafage of a different character to that of the classic orders, and had birds and animals carved amongst it, and the bases of the columns rested on animals. door- ways were square-headed, and had also a circular arch, over which was a pedimented canopy (fig. ). one of the finest examples of lombardic romanesque is the st. zeno church at verona, which has a doorway of this descrip- tion. the church of monreale in sicily (a.d. ), and the cathedral of palermo, exhibit a mixture in which byzantine and saracenic influences are well defined; this was owing to the successive powers that were at different periods masters of that country the normans at a later date made changes in the architec- ture of sicily, and norman archi- tecture was developed to a great extent in this place. it was in sicily that norman fig. .--porch of st. zeno at verona. architecture first developed the characteristic zigzag feature that is seen so much in the norman portals and window-heads in england (figs. and ). the pointed arch of the saracens was added to the norman romanesque in sicily. the cathedral of cefalu ( ), and the palace of la ziza at palermo, are examples. nowhere else was the romanesque of so mixed a character. the illustration from palermo (fig. ) clearly shows the pointed saracenic arch, used after the manner of the romanesque round arching, while some other portions of romanesque architecture and ornament. the details are distinctly byzantine. in the south of france romanesque architecture is far more ornate than that of the norman style in normandy, or other parts of the north; in fact, the latter style in france has its ornament confined to purely linear decoration ; but the churches that were built at the end of the eleventh and beginning of the twelfth centuries, which represent norman architecture in fig. .-berkeley castle, gloucestershire. fig. .—pointed arcading from the cathedral of palermo. its purest phases, were noble edifices, plain and solidly built, of which the church of st. etienne is a good example. its arcades rest on piers, it has a vaulted nave and aisles, and has a fine transept. the gable of the nave is flanked by two western towers, the western front is built in three stories, and has two ranges of five-light windows. the cathedrals of bayeux and evreux may be mentioned as two other fine examples of norman architecture. romanesque architecture and ornament. vaulting still remain, but the rest of the original church has disappeared. on the continent and in england, just after the year , a great building period set in, as for many years prior to this date a corresponding period of an opposite kind, or a lethargy in the life of the christian peoples, and consequently an inactivity in all building operations, was manifested, owing to the prophecy that the end of the world would come in the year . when this was found to be a delusion, a building craze spread over europe, and the eleventh, twelfth, and thirteenth centuries were the great building ages, when both christian and saracenic architecture advanced with leaps and hounds. the normans in england after the conquest, no doubt, hastened the advancement of architecture; for the rule seems to have been that wherever they found a small or old church of the anglo-saxon type or period, they invariably pulled it down, re-dressed the stones, and built a much larger and better church on the same site, using up the old material when available, besides building many churches on new sites. the normans were also much better builders than the saxons, and at this time great numbers of norman masons were brought over from france. the strongholds, or castles, with their massive keeps, were built at this period by the new norman barons, in order not only to have stately dwellings for themselves, but to protect their newly-acquired honours and posses- sions from their saxon foemen. remains of many of these strongholds, especially of the keeps, are still to be seen at hedingham castle at rochester; gundulph's tower—the oldest-at malling, kent; newcastle, guildford, colchester, richmond, and conisborough in yorkshire, &c. one of the earliest is the great white tower of london, in which is found the beautiful little norman chapel, one of the best and most perfect examples of norman architecture in england. the norran keeps, or towers, are uniform in historic ornament. design, having a square plan, with a square projecting turret at each angle, and a flat, thin buttress in the centre of the walls; windows were small, and were round or anal ch fig. .- the landgrave's room at the wartburg. square-headed. the doorways were round-headed, re- cessed, and were generally ornamented. portions of canterbury cathedral, as indeed, of almost all the principal english cathedrals, and many old churches, were built in the norman period, which shows how extensively church building must have been carried romanesque architecture and ornament. on from the conquest ( ) to the commencement of the reign of richard i. ( ). the norman and oldest parts fig. .-romanesque ornament, iron hinge from notre-dame, paris. of canterbury cathedral, built by archbishop lanfranc ( - ), are the towers forming the choir transepts. historic ornament. unfinished, but they had at one time wooden spires. chartres ( ), rheims ( ), and rouen ( ) are other typical examples of this period. the period of the early english style lasted from about a.d. to , embracing the reigns of richard i., john, and henry iii. this style is distinguished from the norman transitional by the light and lofty pillars used singly or in groups and clusters, lancet windows, pointed arches, and by the additional use made of buttresses and pinnacles. the slope or pitch of the roof is in harmony with the pointed arches and lancet windows, and also the pyra- midal towers or spires. the greatest possible difference is thus exhibited between the norman romanesque and the early english gothic. although the ground plan is hardly altered in the latter style, the general lightness and soaring vertical character of almost every detail, and the multiplication of buttresses and pinnacles, give to the gothic erections of this period a triumphal look of mastery over the material that in the science of building was hitherto unknown. the early pointed style in england is seen at its best in lincoln, york, and salisbury cathedrals and in west- minster abbey (fig. ), the cathedral of cologne founded by conrad von hochstaden -that wonderful and huge pile of gothic architecture—belongs partly to the thirteenth but more properly to the fourteenth century, having its foundations laid in and consecrated in . it has been added to considerably even until modern days. it presents a slightly wearisome repetition of parts, especially in the buttresses, pinnacles, and other vertical forms of the exterior, that in a measure robs it of some part of the grandeur and sublimity which we should naturally expect in an edifice of its size and proportions. it is based partly on the design of the great cathedral of amiens in france. the very rich canopies and windows of geometrical + historic ornament. another interesting church in nüremberg is that of st. sebaldus, more from its association with the name and works of adam kraft, who carved the figure work on the exterior, and peter vischer, whose celebrated work is the em aws fig. .-interior of st. lawrence, at nüremberg. chief glory of this church-the shrine of st. sebaldus (fig. ), one of the most important works of the fif- teenth century-than from its merits as an architectural work. the plan of this church is bad in having its nave and aisles of equal width, which is at utter variance with gothic architecture and ornament. all ideas of good proportion and of the gothic style. the shrine of st. sebaldus is modelled and cast in bronze; peter vischer and his five sons laboured on it for twelve years before it was completed. it is gothic entirely in pm jawatuhult g des fig. .—shrine of st. sebaldus, at nüremberg. construction, but most of the forms and details of the orna- ment and figure work are purely italian ; for at this time -the beginning of the sixteenth century-germanic artists were fascinated and strongly influenced by the art that gothic architecture and ornament. arcades under the first story, picturesques balconies, and corner turrets ending in corbels, which were often richly carved. the gothic style was introduced into italy in the twelfth eeee fig. .— town hall, marienberg. usd and thirteenth centuries, but it never took any great root in that country. in rome there are no gothic buildings of this period : there is one of the fifteenth century, the church of minerva, but is a bad example of the style. gothic architecture and ornament. the cathedral of milan is the finest example of a church in the gothic style in italy, though it is by no means pure fig. .- crockets, lincoln. jfsvvallaw. fig. .–from the temple church. gothic. it is built of white marble and has some remark- ably good stained-glass windows. the palazzo publico a b с h e к j fig. .- norman and gothic mouldings. a b c, norman; def, early english ; g h, decorated; i j k, perpendicular. lexx s a wheeler.del.sc fig. .-pedestal, henry vii.'s chapel, historic ornament. built with lozenge-shaped slabs of pink marble, and pierced with a row of large pointed windows, and has smaller circular openings above these. a richly designed battle- ment crowns the walls of the upper story. the caps of the columns are beautifully carved, and sculptured figure h fig. .- place house, cornwall. subjects decorate the corners of the building. this palace was a long time in building ; before it was completed the style had perceptibly changed, so in consequence the portico in some parts belongs to the fourteenth and some to the fifteenth century. gothic architecture and ornament. throughout venice the architecture with gothic pre- tensions is mixed very much with fifteenth and sixteenth venetian or renaissance forms. the ogee arch was used very much, and the decorated style of windows and door- ways, arcadings, and balconies with italian forms made a quaint mixture that gives a very pleasing appearance to some of the venetian palaces. gothic architecture in england has been divided into ton fig. .-flamboyant panel. french, fifteenth century. fig. .– flamboyant panelling. french. three styles ; the early english, which lasted from about a.d. - , in the reigns of richard i., john, and henry iii.; the decorated, a.d. - , in the reigns of edward i., ii., and iii. ; and the perpendicular style, a.d. - , from the time of richard ii. to henry viii. after this it became debased, and finally merged into the tudor or english renaissance, sometimes called the “ elizabethan." a still later mixture of english gothic with italian or flemish renaissance details was developed in the reign of james i., which has been called “ jaco- gothic architecture and ornament. the decorated style is a rich and more ornate phase of the preceding style, and is further marked by the exten- sive use of the ogee arch in doorways and windows (see fig. a), and by the greater profusion of sculptured foliage, flowers, and ornament in the decoration. the ball flower used in the hollow mouldings is characteristic of this style, as the tooth ornament is of the early english. the perpendicular style, as its name denotes, is charac- terized by its long and narrowly divided windows and similar panellings. instead of the flowing lines of tracery b f fig. .- forms of gothic tracery. a, 'trefoil; , quartrefoil; c, cinquefoil; d, Çusped quartrefoil; e, pointed and cusped; f, flamboyant. in the windows, the mullions are of a straight lined and vertical character, and are divided at intervals by tran- soms, or horizontal divisions. the pedestal (fig. ) from henry vii.'s chapel is of perpendicular panelling. the beautiful fan tracery seen in henry vii.'s chapel in westminster abbey and in gloucester cathedral is a variety of this panelling. the doorways in this style have pointed but depressed arches, and as a rule are enclosed with square-headed mouldings or labels. the spandrels formed by this arrangement are filled with tracery and shields. towers and cornices have battlements, &c. (fig. ). a general squareness is given to all the ornaments, historic ornament. and a more severe and dry character is the chief feature of the perpendicular decoration. the flamboyant gothic style of the continent is contem- poraneous with the english perpendicular. the panels at figs. and are very good examples of flam- boyant panel decoration. forms of gothic arches and tracery are given at figs. and . chapter xxi. renaissance architecture and ornament. many things tended to bring about the art of the renaissance. the great impulse given to learning by the study of the writings of the greek and roman poets, lawyers, and philosophers, and the keen study of the rich legacy of art and architecture left by greece and rome, may be reckoned among the chief causes which led to the development during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries of the re-birth or renaissance both of literature and art. dante, and his successors petrarch and boccaccio, were called “humanists," for the reason that they studied and advocated the knowledge that was needful to man in his progress and in relation to his life in this world, and did not confine themselves wholly to theology, which was the case with those who devoted themselves to learning in the middle ages. this led to a wider spread of knowledge among the people, which was greatly stimulated by the invention of printing. the rulers of the people also encouraged learning and promoted the arts to an extent unknown before. in florence, especially, under the powerful and beneficent rule of the medici family, art and literature received every attention, and made rapid progress in every department of cultured knowledge and skilful handicraft. great artists like niccola pisano, brunellesco, donatello, giotto, alberti, and others of the early period, whose individuality and great personality did more than any- vol. i. bb historic ornament. vasari—that in pisa there had been accumulated a great collection of antique sculpture—the spoils of war-and among them a sarcophagus, on which the “hunt of meleager and the calydonian boar” was wrought with great skill, which was placed for ornament on the façade of the cathedral: this and other antique remains in the city were studied to great advantage by niccola, to the great improvement of his style. one fine work of his, , executed in the spirit of the antique, was the pulpit for the church of san giovanni in pisa, on which are great numbers of figures, representing the universal judgment. for the cathedral of siena he also executed a similar work with subjects from various passages in the life of christ. on this pulpit he had the assistance of arnolfo and lapo, his pupils, and probably also that of his son giovanni. these works proved the great turning point in sculpture, from the archaic productions of the middle ages to an era of better things, although in execution they left much to be desired. giotto was not only the great painter who first invested his works with poetry, feeling, and expression, but was also a skilful architect, as his fine campanile, or bell-tower, in his native city of florence bears witness. dante and petrarch were his friends, the former especially so; the portrait of dante by giotto still exists in the chapel of the podesta at florence. brunellesco, as we learn from vasari, was one of the most interesting of men, and one of the most capable artists of his time, a man of acute genius and ready resource. in the early renaissance period architecture was studied by nearly all sculptors and painters, and many, as we have seen, were apprenticed in their youth as gold- smiths. brunellesco was no exception to this rule, for we find that he was a clever goldsmith and worker in niello. the greatest work of his life was the building of the cupola or dome of the cathedral of florence--he was the only architect of his day that was found able to do it. the cathedral was the work of the florentine architect, i historic ornament. ito'' pil at the "rusticated,” like so many of the italian palaces (fig. ). this is a roughened form of stonework, and was copied from roman buildings, which, together with the heavy cornices and symmetrical repetition of windows, gave these palaces a heavy and imposing look. another palace of the rucellai type is the cancelleria at rome, which was built by bramante ( - ), a native of castel-durante, in urbino, who also built st. peter's at rome, and who was the greatest architect of the renaissance, of whom michelangelo testified “that bramante was equal to any architect who has appeared from the time of the ancients to our own, can by no means be denied.” michelangelo himself was the archi- tect of the dome of st. peter's, and his sublime works in sculpture and fresco adorn the interior. the cancelleria palace is a master- piece of elegance and good propor- tion. it has two imposing doorways, and the plainness of its lower story contrasts agreeably with the upper two, which have rows of round- headed windows enclosed in flat or fig. .–portion of the strozzi palace. square-headed architraves, and are placed at agreeable distances above the entablatures of the lower stories. the two upper stories are divided alternately into wide and narrow divisions by pilasters, the windows being placed in the wide'divisions. this building is a marked improvement in point of beauty on the pitti and rucellai palaces. the farnese palace is another typical building of the renaissance. the design of it is attributed to antonio picconi, who took the surname of san gallo ( ?- ). it is built in three stories, without pilasters, with a widely projecting cornice, and has rather a monotonous look with renaissance architecture and orvament. its numerous windows of equal size. michelangelo is said to have designed some of the windows and the cornice (fig. ), though some say that the architect vignola was the designer of the cornice, the central doorway is "rusticated” and arched, and the angles of the building are of dressed stones. the celebrated building known as the certosa (charter- house) of pavia was begun by borgognone in the year , is an example of the most ornate phase of the renaissance, and offers a widely-marked contrast to the almost bald simplicity of the palace just described (fig. ). as a whole, the facade of this building cannot be called a model of good architectural composition, but it is easier to criticise its faults in this respect than to sug- gest improvements. it contains, how- ever, many striking elements of beauty, and is full of useful suggestions to the architect and decorative artist. the plan and shell of renaissance buildings were usually of the roman- esque or gothic types; the dome, columns, and ornament generally were fig. .-upper story all borrowed from the roman remains. of the farnese palace, rome. designed the column, round arch, and hori- partly by m. angelo. zontal lintel or architrave feature were extensively used in the palaces and other buildings of venice (fig. ), though the renaissance style had a difficult task to make headway in venice against the strong byzan- tine and gothic traditions that had hitherto prevailed. the general type of the venetian palaces is a solid panelled wall and pier arrangement or rusticated lower story, which supports a central loggia, or arcaded second story, that has circular-headed windows and heavy cornices and balconies. the whole façade is richly decorated with engaged columns and pilasters. historic ornament. kla v the cornaro, now the mocenigo palace, the grimani on the grand canal, now the post office, and the spinelli palace, are said to have originally been built from the designs of the great military architect, san michele, of verona ( - ), to whom the signori of venice owed so much as the designer of their forti- fications. jacopo sansovino, who built the library of san marco at venice (fig. ); palladio ( - ), the well-known writer on cojo architecture; scamozzi, and the lombardi family, may be mentioned as other celebrated architects and ornamentists, who executed many works in venice and in verona, florence, padua, vicenza, rome and milan, etc., during the sixteenth cen- tury. it was the tendency of the renaissance period to build palaces and castles, and in the later bioiqiqitedigo a tomaia times municipal and pri- vate dwellings, as learning fig. .–portion of the certosa of pavia. and the arts were getting into the hands of the lay- men, in contrast to the days of the middle ages, when the clergy and monks were the architects and master-builders: in those days hardly anything but churches had archi- tectural pretensions; but the case was different in the renaissance times, when the architects were not bound by renaissance architecture and ornament. name of “françois premier” (ier) has been given. this style was chiefly brought about by the employment of the italian sculptors and architects, serlio, vignola, prima- ticcio, il rosso, cellini, and others who had been invited by francis i. to build and decorate his châteaux and palaces. primaticcio was also entrusted with the task of collecting a series of antique casts and copies of antiques from rome for the gardens of the palace at fontainebleau. this, no doubt, had the effect of helping to form the taste for classic art among french artists. owing to all the above circumstances, french art began to show more of the influence of the italian style. the roman orders were henceforth invariably used, but still the new style was modified in a great measure to suit the french taste. what is known as the henri deux (henry ii.) style is another french development of the cinquecento, in which there is a preponderance of strap-work, with figures, masks, grotesques, cartouches of all kinds, and much of the con- ventional saracenic ornament. the monogram of henry ii. and the arms of catherine de' medici often appear in this ornament, as seen in the decorations of the château d'anet ( ) and on the oiron or henri deux pottery. pierre lescot ( - ) designed the western façade of the louvre, in paris, and jean buillant designed the oldest parts; these two architects and another, philibert delorme, brought the renaissance to such a head in france that it became immediately the national style. the great names in architectural sculpture of the early french renaissance were jean goujon and paul ponce, who carved the principal figures of the façades of the louvre. towards the early part of the seventeenth century the architecture began to assume a more florid character, under the hands of lepautre and du cerceau. it became richer, but less pure in style, an example of which is the apollo gallery of the louvre, designed by lepautre. by the time of the latter half of the seventeenth century the desire for show and the expression of magnificence, historic ornament. e especially brought about by the “grand monarque,” louis xiv., assisted by the efforts of his architects, mansard, perrault, lemercier, and blondel, who ministered to the whims of the powerful king, speedily laid the founda- tions for the loose and unrestrained baroque or rococo style which subsequently followed. the name of “ louis quatorze" has been given to the style developed in the reign of this king. “louis quinze” and “louis seize" are names of subsequent french styles, which will be considered under the head of renaissance ornament. the tame and spiritless palace of versailles was designed by françois mansard, who invented the mansard roofs which have been used together with this style for nearly all the palatial buildings of europe. the purity of the italian renaissance was forgotten or ignored by the nations of europe, and the stiff and pompous buildings of louis xiv. were accepted as the patterns that all civiliza- tion was eager to copy. even old churches and mediæval castles were transformed in some portions of their interiors into louis xiv. imitations. in windsor castle the great ballroom has been vilely treated with the meaningless incrustations of this period, by the way of decorations, endeavouring, however, to make amends for its tasteless poverty of invention by the arrogant display of its rich covering of gold leaf. in the late seventeenth and during the eighteenth centuries, the rococo or baroque phase of the re- naissance was in vogue in italy and france, and indeed everywhere in europe. the main characteristic of the baroque style is the undue prominence given to the ornament and decoration, which arose from a gradual forgetfulness of the roman and greek principles of con- struction, and a want of order in the arrangement of the principal forms in the architecture. by degrees these forms took a secondary position : columns supported nothing or only a few mouldings, cornices and pediments were broken, brackets and consoles were inverted, mould- . historic ornament. in spain the renaissance, mixed with some saracenic features, produced some very good work; the typical example of spanish renaissance is the escurial, the great palace of the spanish kings. in germany the italian renaissance made but a tardy advance, and was never thoroughly at home in that country. german renaissance is far less refined than that of other countries which were influenced by the italian style. it is chiefly in painting, furniture, book illustration, and in goldsmiths' work that it appears at its best, and not in architecture. this was owing to the art of germany being at that time in the hands of the burghers when the advent of the renaissance took place, and also that the mass of the people were more concerned in the study of ethics and philosophy than the arts. another reason may be added, that the nation was unsettled, and occupied with the great religious upheaval of the reformation. all these things proved to be sufficient to retard the advancement of the renaissance in germany for more than a hundred years. one of the best examples of the renaissance we can point to in germany is the castle of heidelberg, built by the elector otto heinrich ( - ). the two façades of this castle, which are now in ruins, have engaged columns and pilasters; the windows have rather heavy- headed features, and are richly carved; statues are placed in the niches between the windows. the portico of the town hall at cologne is another example, and the cloth hall at brunswick is a very interesting specimen of german renaissance. it is deficient in proportion, how- ever, by the extreme horizontality of its eight series of low stories in the principal façade, but is otherwise very picturesque. the german renaissance towards the later periods was characterised by its elaborate carving of ornament, figures, and animals in wood and stone; armorial bearings, escutcheons, shields, and cartouches or ornamental labels were very common in german work, and in most other historic ornament. piazza in covent garden, and crewe hall in cheshire were built from his designs. the cathedral of st. paul's is too well known to need description. it may be mentioned as the most important example of the late renaissance in england. thirty-five years in building ( - ), and although poliulia julhos wildlandiri wer fig. .-elizabethan, north entrance, wollaton house. some details and the ornament generally incline to the baroque, the building as a whole is one of the finest and most impressive works ever produced in any country. wren built a great many churches in london during the time that was occupied in the building of st. paul's, st. stephen's, walbrook, being one of his finest. chelsea hospital, the royal exchange, together with some city renaissance architecture and ornament. halls and twenty-five churches, were built from his designs or under his directions. the architecture of the present day in france leans mostly to renaissance traditions. in germany, greek and roman styles find favour, but menu fig. .-the ancient parlour, holland house. gothic and renaissance, and sometimes romanesque style of buildings are now erected. in england about one hundred years ago there was a greek revival, due in a great measure to the publication of stuart and revett's works in connection with their close vol. i. СС renaissance architecture and ornament. subjects that were painted on the walls, which were often divided into friezes, panels, and dados. these decorations w uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuunn wwwinni fig. .- objects of art handiwork, from pompeii. were executed in tempera colours of bright reds, greens, yellows, blues, and black. the antique grotesques, so historic ornament. examples of the style, as they appear in architectural decoration, for under the heads of the various historic o b d $ $ $ $ dopopoo dotari . fig. .-mural painting. pompeii. industrial arts many examples of renaissance ornament will come under our notice in a succeeding volume. an se fig. .- candelabra and vase panel. h. m. spari ing. del fig. .-- cinquecento; from the martinengo tomb, brescia, historic ornament. the crescent arms of diana of poitiers are seen very often on the shields. jean goujon and jean cousin were employed on the decoration of this castle. an extremely rich example of french carved wood is ercrucicu للللل reliquis victor rr fig. . – ceiling decoration, from san spirito, florence. by sansovino. the panel from the château gaillon, in normandy ( ) (fig. ). the above examples, and the chimney-piece panel by germain pilon ( ) (fig. ), another sculptor em- ployed by catherine de' medici, are a few of the best specimens of the cinquecento period in france. -- renaissance architecture and ornament. elizabethan ornament, or that of the renaissance in england, is characterized by a preponderance of strap- work, and has animals, masks, rosettes, half-lion or half- human terminals, debased class of mouldings, and very little foliage. the example given-the panelling from the old guard chamber, westminster ( ), exhibits a strong influence of saracenic tracery that was prevalent in much of the later furniture and textiles of the renais- sance (fig. ). shield-work was not so prominent in the pure elizabe- than as in the jacobean (james i.) style; the carved stone hoc fig. .–panel from chimneypiece; louvre. by germain pilon. escutcheon-like work from crewe hall, cheshire, attri- buted to inigo jones (fig. ), shows the beginning of the jacobean shield-work. this style is best seen in the carved-wood furniture of the period, and both it and the elizabethan are generally speaking offshoots of the flemish and german phases of the renaissance. eliza- bethan ornament is of great variety, the panelling and other arrangements are sometimes composed purely of strap-work of a rectangular flat perforated appearance, sometimes seen in the doorways and chimney fronts, as at hardwick hall, haddon hall, speke and crewe halls. another kind is of a more curved variety, with figures and historic ornament. pavala serres se. fig. .-example of dietterlin's architecture; german, sixteenth century. art publications- continued. statham-architecture for general readers. a short treatise on the principles and motives of architectural design. by h. h. statham. with illus- trations drawn by the author. third edition, revised. large crown vo. . taylor-elementary art teaching: an educational and technical guide for teachers and learners. by e. r. taylor. with over diagrams and illustrations. second edition. large crown vo. . tebbs—the new lace embroidery (punto tagliato). by louisa a. tebbs. with thirty-four illustrations. new edition. to. . net. tebbs—the art of bobbin lace. a practical text-book of workman- ship, illustrated with original designs in italian, point de flandre, bruges guipure, duchesse, honiton, “raised" honiton, appliqué, and bruxelles. also how to clean and repair valuable lace, etc. by louisa a. tebbs. to. . net. vinycomb-fictitious and symbolic creatures in art. with special references to their use in british heraldry. by john vinycomb. with numerous illustrations. demy vo. . d. net. ward and aitchison–the principles of ornament. by j. ward. ed. by george aitchison, a.r.a. fully illustrated. large crown vo. . d. ward-colour harmony and contrast. for the use of art students, designers, and decorators. by james ward. with sixteen coloured illustrations and several half-tone pictures. . d. net. ward-floral studies for decorative design. by james ward. in portfolio. . net. ward–progressive design for students. by james ward. with forty-two full page plates, comprising upwards of , drawings. vo. . net. ward-historic ornament. a treatise on decorative art and archi- tectural ornament. by james ward. volume i.-- prehistoric art; ancient art and architecture; eastern, early christian, byzantine, saracenic, romanesque, gothic, and renaissance architecture and ornament. with illustrations. second edition. demy vo. . d. volume ii.-pottery. enamels, ivories, metal work, furniture, textile fabrics, mosaics, glass, and book decoration. with illustrations. demy svo. . d. ward-fresco painting : its art and technique. with special refer- ence to the buono and spirit fresco methods. by james ward. with four plates in colour and thirty-one half-tone illustrations of italian and other fresco paintings. royal vo. . od. net. wornum—the analysis of ornament -the characteristics of styles. by r. n. wornum. new edition. fully illustrated. royal vo. . plants and animals as foundations for designs in form and colour. verneuil-the animal in decoration. by m. p. verneuil. intro- duction by eugene grasset. this magnificent work consists of ten parts, each containing six coloured plates, treating of the use of certain animal forms in decorative design. sixty plates. in ten parts, each containing six plates, . net per part. grasset-plants and their application to ornament. edited by eugene grasset. first series. this magnificent work contains seventy-two coloured plates. in twelve parts, . net per part. grasset-plants and their application to ornament. edited by eugene grasset. second series. this magnificent work contains seventy-two coloured plates. in twelve parts, . net per part. london: chapman & hall, ltd. library university of california riverside illustrations a r c h it e c t u r e o rn a m e n t. illustrations a r c h it e c t u r e orn a m ent a series of seventy plates drawn and etched on copper, from his own sketches in france, italy, spain, germany, holland, and belgium. n º by j. b. waring, f.r.i.b.a. | ti author of “the arts connected with architecture in central italy;” “architectural art in italy and spain” (with macquoid); “architectural studies at burgos and miraflores, spain;” “designs for civic architecture;” “masterpieces of industrial art;” “treasures of ornamental art, manchester, ;” &c. with descriptive notices by the artist. l o n do n : black ie & son, paternoster row: glasgow and edinburgh. . /// , / – ~ º º - - º º (sa , - * - “the great business of stupy is to for m a minu adaptel and adequate to all times and all occasions: to which all nature is then laid open, and which may be said to possess thf. key to her inexhaustible rich es.”—sir joshua reynolds, discourse xi. *- - - (; i, as(;ow : w. g. blackie and co., printers, vi li. a fireſ, p. * * * -- * : * , fº ---, -, . -ºs) of j. º.º. . . . . . . . . º p. r. e. f. a. c. e. §he intention of the present undertaking is to present a fresh and sug- §§ § # gestive series of examples in architectural and ornamental design, ſ ºrs which it is hoped will assist in new inventions and adaptations, and ºº:: * be of practical service to all who are engaged in the execution of orna- mental work. during several extensive tours in various parts of europe, the author accumulated a great mass of drawings and sketches, principally relating to architecture and the arts connected with it, from which the following selection is made. these are all taken directly from the objects represented, and very few of the examples chosen have been heretofore published in any form: the plates having, with few exceptions, been etched by the author from his own drawings, the mistakes which sometimes occur when sketches are translated by a second hand have thereby been avoided. the etchings are purposely done in a pictorial style, being intended to serve rather as motives for fresh designs than as models for exact reproduction. although the illustrations relate mostly to architecture, and are instructive to architects, they will be found interesting to the archaeolo- gist, and useful to ornamental designers and art workmen of all classes; and it is hoped that they will likewise prove attractive to the amateur as well as to the artist. the author is desirous of enlisting the sympathies of the public in the cause of art, being satisfied that the more extended and more appreciative our art-loving public becomes, the better will be the work of the artist who labours to produce works of beauty, and who, like all other artists—the poet, musician, painter, orator, and actor—depends greatly for the success of his efforts on the sympathy he meets with from those to whom he addresses himself. in forwarding this object the sketches now published will, it is hoped, exercise a beneficial effect. who that is gifted with an appreciation for art, but will admire the bold and powerful ornamental sculpture of the romanesque period; the quaint fancy and elegance of the dutch and north german was work, contents, and list of the ill u s t r ation s. pl, athºs. ii. iii. iv. vi. vii. . viii. ix. xii. . xiii. xiv, xv. , xvi. xvii. xviii. xix. xx. . xxi. xxii. xxiii. xxiv. xxv. • xxvi. xxvii xxviii. . xxix. xxx. xxxi. xxxii, xxxiii. . xxxiv. . xxxv. xxxvi. , xxxvii. romanesque decorative sculpture, from st. gilles (gard), romanesque sculptured ornament, museum, toulouse, romanesque capitals, museum, toulouse, - - - romanesque ornament, abbey of moissac (tarn et garonne), romanesque sculpture, portal of st. croix, bordeaux, romanesque stone carving, notre-dame, poitiers, . . - - - romanesque stone carving, notre-dame, poitiers, and st. gilles (gard), romanesque figure sculpture, from toulouse and arles, romanesque ornament and ancient lettering, from various sites, romanesque sculpture, from various sites, . transitional romanesque sculpture, spain, wood and stone carving, from burgos, spain, . romanesque and medleval germs, from various sites, romanesque ornament, from pisa and assisi, - romanesque sculpture, from lucca, pisa, and genoa, romanesque ornament, from ravello and venice, romanesque sculpture, from pisa and volterra, - - - romanesque and mediaeval stone corbels and capitals, medi.eval sculpture, from auxerre cathedral, mediaeval sculpture, from lyons and auxerre, . - - entrance tower to willeneuve-les-avignon, france, triple chimney-place in the salle-de-justice, poitiers, medleval stone carving, france and germany, mediaeval sculpture in alabaster; miraflores, spain, medleval sculpture in alabaster; miraflores, spain, , medi.eval sculpture, from burgos and miraflores, spain, . mediaeval sculpture, from san juan, toledo, spain, . mediaeval carving in wood, germany, - sculptured door and window. jambs, from italy, mediaeval carving in wood, italy and france, mediaeval carving in stone, toulouse and bordeaux, medleval stone-work, from various sites, moorish capitals, from the alhambra, granada, moorish ornament, from toledo and granada, moorish ornament, from granada and segovia, portion of great “corona,” hildesheim cathedral, . laten font in the bruderkirche, brunswick, - viii contemts. plates. xxxviii. xxxix. . xl. . xli. . xlii. xliii. xliv. xlv. xlvi. xlvii. bronze monument, magdeburg cathedral, , portion of great brass screen, haarlem cathedral, ornamental mediaeval ironwork, from various sites, ornamental iron work, from augsburg, munich, and ulm, ornamental ironwork, from augsburg and ulm, ornamental ironwork, from germany and holland, - - ornamental iron railings, fuggers chapel, st. ulrich, augsburg, ornamental ironwork, from buildings in augsburg, ornamental ironwork, from ulm and augsburg, ornamental metal-work, south of france, ornamental ironwork, from various sites, . ornamental metal-work, from various sites, marble and stone brackets, from florence and pisa, renaissance crestings, &c., in wood and stone, ornamental stonework, from palermo and bologna, ornamental stonework, from florence and siena, palace gateway and church-tower, walladolid, - picturesque compositions in architecture, from various sites, architectural compositions, from various sites, . . . . woodwork from half-timbered houses, north germany, monuments and monumental slabs, germany and holland, drinking horn and tenure horn, from amsterdam and toulouse, renaissance ornamental sculpture, italy and france, - - note on the artistic value of the preceding examples, . - - on the adaptation of plant forms to ornament, and on devices for the façades of buildings, . - - - - plants suitable for ornament: great thistle, plants suitable for ornament: acanthus and thistle, plants suitable for ornament: great thistle, &c., plants suitable for sculpture: artichoke, cactus, &c., plants suitable for sculpture: water melon, &c., - - - plants suitable for sculptured ornament: thorn apple, &c., . plants suitable for sculptured ornament: arum, canna, flowers suitable for ornament: lily and iris, . plants suitable for ornament: hellebore, &c., plants suitable for ornament: creepers, xlviii. . xlix. l. li. . lii. . liii. liv. lv. . lvi. . lvii. lviii. lix. lx. . i, xi. . lxii. i, xiii. lxiv. lxv. lxvi. lxvii. lxviii. . i, xix. lxx. index, in which the illustrations are arranged according to their localities, direction to the binder. *** place the plates in the order of their numbers immediately after the contents, and the descriptious at the end. (; º º sº *…*.*.iº. tilſilſ - - - sº sºsºsº º zºë-rº º, i. roman esque decorative sculpture. from facade of s: g|l es (gard). france t ro man es que or na ment museu m. to u l ou se. () s no in o l w na sn w stv ] | dv o} () () s + n \ w o h |- — — - — — — —– – – – – – – ، ، ،|----- §<<<<<~: ----_-| º --- º º | nv - b s owssl w abg gw e, hi woh h (ine w wn e fi òse nywoh , , ºg útº- , •••± r . , (xnv ho x | is tv lÀ , h i w o h h h h ſildī£ s etiÒ se nw woh ¿ººº,) №*#|-\ !,ſeº. ?? z º.º. )** es) | /|- ------ – – - - - - - plaze & stone carv no not re dame, po|t| ers. stone cary | no not re dame. po|t| e r s (a) from st o || le s roman es que f | g u r e – sculpt u r e. ) from st s e r nin, toulo us e. ( ) m u s e u m toulo us e. the rest from sarco ph a g |, a r l e s m u s e u m. (i. "o c t o l 'n w n ſ nvs woh + (+) iso h d g h v hn ‘sv ſi h s vt ho s h h is i oto e hi woh-( - ) ° n i v d s * b h nld n n o s b n Ó s b n v w o h t v n o i s n w h i | wood and ston m onu m e n t s - las h u e l g a s. "“” – _-t e. c.a.r.v. n.g. burgos, spa' n. ! | s | s s 'o n | - [] }} n \; s \,\} \ x + [] l n b w v n h o b n Ò s = n w w o b -***#!***************** ##### * ± √ v § │ ~ wo w () [] [] ſ či o () o h / n o h g - tl + n \; , rowanesque and medeval stone cor bels. and capitals. . . from the cloisters of montmajour near arles. . strophime, arles. . s. sernin, toulouse. . . s. jean, poitiers . . beaucaire, tower chapel. |o || || . acen cathedral i mortuary chapel mont majour. * . . s. porchaire, potters. .le mans cathedral. , . moss ac abbey church, the rest from poitiers cathedral. plate/ mediaeval sculpture auxer re cath e d r al. (a) p sano, or vieto. a late c medieval sculptuſ e, france. from the faca d f : lºy ons cath edral (a) from a u x e r re cath e d r a l. º plate . w \!| | || - ! | ----- ! %%%%%ſaeŹŹ% ź Ź =·%! Źź(~~~~ ſſſſſſſſſſſſſſſſ-hae. ſı| zŤ . ! · ø, º ae zſae! entrance tower to v |lleneuve les avic non. ---- — — ~~~~ s h h | | | d º || s n ^ b g h ii y s! o b | d a b n w / h o →()ſae „ſº · i º : : i n was sºon jº w s ln hºlſ. now tv/ t h | |no h h | n = \| v n h o h = svgwiw n | h ſhla tſh os tva c w tº - ~º-> ſ \ ; l s y; - s c u l ptu r e | n a laba ste r. port |ons of the royal monuments miraflores, castille plate . m e d | eva l sculptu r e. spa | n. l. . from burgos cathedral, the remainder from the royal monuments, miraflores. såſº |-, ,ſº = }|-·|- |-| • ºy ſłº. (tº) || | ſae … :( ¿iſº y ae” , · ---|-¤ tº ſ----|- ·==|- ----ſaeſ?|-ſae, ſae|| |||||| |- - |-- --… - …--- - - -• • ... ( ~~ |- -- :)…|------|---- m e d | eva l scu l ptu r e. spa in . from t h e clo |s| f rs of san juan to le do. ala#e . sz–№zº() sculptu red d r and win dow j am b.s. (l) v en c e. ( ) great hos pital, m | lan (a ) duo mo, florence wood c a r v | n c . from the stalls, san zeno, verona. hotel cluny. par s. · xnvāqhog ( hoi'n is 'h}| ||n}} (zº e s [\ot []()| · n o l s n i n i /\ h \' o t \, a b | c. b. w }o^t av n i —------- · vo vnv), o v h g wvhtv woh + h o ni v w b b b hl ) og etol ' von vt e vi (w ‘s woh + '| ' n e wwn hs | ± w tºº ºgłºſy- --- -- --- - - - - - -- - -- - - - - · \, |\oo e s ' №v zvotv ahl woh + t° , vo vnv ho'wyſºg ww ht w Łhi woh + lnbwvn h o hs w ( ) z ! ºvº * º s * c < * * * ºf ſº ſº ºf & . < < * , * aº * - . | a t e n f o n t b r u nsw c k . tv ( u - h l w o oh [] & b c u v w 'h e ho si /\ /\{| ' | n → w [] n o w z noh e | '') { * h №, №. - *~ ---- ſae, =&#### po rt | on of the gre at brass sc re en, haar l e m cath e d r a l - liliº º jº, . --- - | from the º ſº - £ e. | r o n w o r k maximi lan museum, aucsburo the national banarian museum, munich. the town hall, ulm. vico della casana antica, genoa. Țſ, ºro) tv bhlw o wnt ſi tº i hoi nqw 'lyſ v w qan , ç | }} }] o m n o | –-) --~ ~= ':)-- _ · | oh ^ g soov ' w () e sqw | z | | plate | r o n w o r. k. a u c s b u r c . | socc in cer thor, . town hall . cath edral u l m . -. . . cath e d r a l. | r o n w o r k . | | r on corona, macde bu r o c r l l e stul rich, auc sbu r o . dom auc sbu rc h a a r l. f. m o u d f k e r k . a m s t e r d a m plate . | ron railing, fucc e r s chapel, stulrich auc sbu r g. plate | ron wo r k . | hinges ulm cathe dral stulrich augsburo aucsburg, dom kirche. - - - - plate . { // . & z•-i | =æ&s√≠√∞ ¿№ſº-º-º-º-º-º-º-º-º-º-o---- ſ/- - - - - - -swae¿№ )---- f~|#№|nu\ſ*$/))?'; ÈËžĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒĒ## |[ )(( | } \ ! ,§§!\, ſºff| !!!!!!!!!--~~~~! **:! ſºſ:© ---- #№] () ºffſ| ſae, |', | rºw\ ,slſaeza jºſšķsvēſ & § |- : (=s)№ £ĶĒ№ºš!!! o r e n a is s a n c e o fr n am e n t a l s c u lpt u r e . ( ) bronze turncock, ( ) marble final ( ) wood colonnette hotel cluny ( ) bron z e lamp, dijon museum. par s. plate, . - \ \ \ | plant s suitable for or nament. i : ** plaze . sutable for sculptured ornament. plan t s - - ae * * * ** ill u s t r ations of architecture and ornament. description of the plates. =:----- decorative sculpture from the church of st. gilles (gard), france. p la " e /. by a very close adherence to gallo-roman models, combined with a strongly-marked adoption of byzantine mouldings and ornament. this is here shown in the mouldings of the fluted dado and the sculptured pedestal. the pedestal forms part of the principal entrance to the church, and the sculptures represent cain and abel offering their sacrifices to jehovah. the dresses of these figures are purely byzantine, and the manner in which their robes are hung on projecting knobs is not uncommon in byzantine and romanesque illuminations of the th and th centuries. the sculpture is in low-relief and very spirited—the grinning devil in the right-hand spandril being particularly noticeable. the oval subject represents the creator seated above the clouds and on the waters, holding the earth in his hand, with a flame and light point nimbus over his head. the capital, formed by eagles, is one of a row running along the entire façade of the church, which is richly carved throughout in the manner here indicated. this is one of the most graceful examples we have met with in french romanesque architecture. the present abbey church of st. gilles was dedicated by pope urban ii., a.d. , and these details are all from the principal front, with exception of the inlaid archivolt (a) and fluted dado (b), which are to be found among the remains of a still older church adjoining the present oile. a description of the plates. excellent result in breaking the line and catching light. the piece from st. gilles forms the companion dado of the façade to that of cain and abel, shown in plate i. the subject, an allegorical one, is of frequent occurrence in romanesque buildings, and may symbolize the devil in the form of a centaur seeking to slay the soul in the form of a hart. the strongly-marked graeco-assyrian character of the centaur in this piece is very interesting. romanesque figure-sculpture from toulouse and arles. plate viii. we may see in this group of subjects the characteristics of two distinct schools of sculpture, which were gradually developed in europe up to and after the th century. nos. and represent portions of marble slabs let into the wall at the back of the choir of st. saturnin or sernin, toulouse, which, if not actually of byzantine workmanship, are close copies of byzantine models. they exhibit perhaps the lowest state to which the art could fall, in the utter want of expression and design, poorness of execution, and plaited character of drapery, the nature of which may be seen on figure . m. didron ascribes these pieces of sculpture to the th century; remains of colour are still to be traced upon them. from this school sprung almost all the figure-sculpture of cisalpine europe up to the th century, that of later date being generally formed on roman models. in the south of france sculpture of this class was perhaps carried to greater perfec- tion than in any other part of europe. an example of this is given in no. , the statue of a saint, in the museum of toulouse, executed by gilibertus, probably of the th century, which, however stiff and inartistic, is still a fine work in point of execution, and not destitute of a certain quiet dignity of character. the sarcophagi from the arles museum are of much earlier date and of great interest; they range from the th to probably the th century. we have selected portions of the christian monuments only. the upper portion of a tomb contains the apostles in niches, with wreaths of victory and symbolic sculpture above. the female figure in the centre-piece represents mary, the mother of christ, with eagles holding wreaths. the head to the left is from the tomb of the labarum, - b description of the plates. might be repeated with advantage so as to form a double group. the brackets ( ) support the organ-loft of the conventual church of st. clara, burgos. they are of wood, and very effective in design. the stone sarcophagus supported by animals, emblematic, we think, of vigilance, courage, and fidelity, is a good example of transitional romanesque, probably of the latter part of the th century; and is preserved, with many others, in the entrance porch of the con- vent of las huelgas, near burgos. romanesque and mediaeval germs from various sites. p la " e a / ii. the upper portion of the plate exhibits rudimentary crockets and surface ornamentation. the fine leaf-ornament ( ), dying off into the soffit of the arch, from the portal of st. emilion (gironde), is remarkably good. the town of st. emilion itself, as a well-preserved relic of the middle ages, fully repays a visit by the architect. its rock-cut church is a work of unusual interest archaeologically. the capitals from le mans are of the highest interest as remains of early buildings, which we are inclined to assign to the th century, if not earlier. they are to be found in the churches of notre dame de la couture and notre dame du pré, where they form part of blank arcades continued round a portion of the walls on the ground level, and are evidently remains of earlier buildings. the very peculiar character of the bases, almost like inverted capitals, is fully shown in the examples we have selected. the portion of a channelled pier on the left side of the lower part of the plate is from the interior of valence cathedral, and is interesting as belonging probably to the carlovingian period. romanesque ornament, part of bronze door, pisa cathedral; and of principal entrance, san rufino, assisi. p la te ai v. the bronze door of the south transept in pisa cathedral is the only one remaining of three originally executed by bonanno of pisa, about the year . c , illustrations of architecture and ornament. unlike the earlier bronze doors of italy, especially those of the south, it shows little trace of byzantine influence, but rather a bold, heavy, and, it must be admitted, a somewhat inartistic development of romanesque art. the inscription in the panel we have selected, representing the annunciation, is “ave maria gratia plena.” the flowers are effective, and the junction of the roll-mouldings cleverly arranged. in kugler's kunstgeschichte will be found a list of many of the most important bronze doors of this period; and in the duc de luyne's and baltard's recherches sur les monuments des normands en sicile, many good illustrations of ancient bronze doors in south italy. the cathedral of assisi, dedicated to st. rufinus, was finished by giovanni da gubbio, a.d. , but was not consecrated before the year , by gregory ix. the rich central doorway, part of which is here delineated, is a striking work, and remarkable as showing similar symbolical sculpture on its columns to that at lucca (no. , plate xv), and a lion rending a pagan figure, as seen at st. gilles (gard), (plate x. no. ). romanesque sculpture from lucca, pisa, and genoa. pj, a te x v. the stone font for complete immersion, in the church of san frediano (frithian), at lucca, is ornamented with rough sculpture, a portion of which we have given (no. ), representing two figures on horseback, called traditionally knights templar, but which is most likely meant to be a portion of pharaoh's host in the red sea. robertus magister signs this work with his name, the date, according to kugler, being . the sculptured transom of san salvatore (no. ) is of much more careful execution, and of rather later date; it represents the baptism of a saint, and is inscribed with the name of st. nicholas, patron saint of baptism, as well as that of “biduino,” a sculptor who worked about the year . this is a good specimen of italian sculpture at the close of the th century, and enables us to measure the immense advance made in the early part of the th century by nicolo pisano, one of the greatest geniuses of any age. description of the plates. the column no. , from the arcade of the principal front of lucca cathedral, is sculptured with figures illustrative, we conceive, of the combats between the virtues and vices. it bears a very close analogy to the so-called mysterious column of freysing cathedral (bavaria), which m. martin, in a very elaborate and clever article, has endeavoured to connect with the adventures of the scandinavian mythical hero siegfried (see cahier and martin, mélanges d'archéologie). no. shows part of a carved column in low relief, from one of the principal entrances to the duomo, at lucca. notice here the figure of a huntsman blowing his horn, which is a counterpart of numerous horns, often called tenure-horns (see plate lix.), and sometimes believed to be drinking-horns; but this they were not, the drinking-horn being of quite a different form; they are called tenure-horns from the fact of their being deposited as tokens of fiefdom of forest land or hunting- ground. the serpent on a column (no. ) is from one of the upper arcades of the church of san paolo ripa d'arno, pisa. this column we believe to be unique; the device evidently relates to one of the oldest myths on record. no. shows part of an angle of the cathedral of genoa, and introduces a lioness supporting a pillar, a device of frequent occurrence in the lombardic churches of northern italy. the lion, in ancient church symbolism, bears many meanings; at st. gilles, france, and assisi, italy, we have him represented rending the enemies of christ; in the present instance we conceive to be represented a lioness (the church, the spouse of christ, who was descended from david, the lion of the tribe of judah) protecting one of her children, a lamb, and supporting other members of the church, smaller lions, who form one of its pillars, and drive out the evil one in the shape of a dragon (see also st. gilles, plate x. no. ). we may here remark, that the distinction between lions and lionesses should always be discriminated, as they doubtless, we think, severally symbolize christ and his church; the differences are marked, and strikingly shown in plate iv., containing the central pier of moissac abbey doorway. romanesque sculptured ornament and inlaid work from ravello and venice. pla " e. y. v.i. some of the most highly-finished sculpture in romanesque art is to be found on the pulpit of the church of ravello, near amalfi, southern italy. the description of the plates. the corbels in the cloisters which form the entrance to the church are very frequently similar to the examples ( – ) from the cloisters at arles, which are symbolical, we think, of the slaughter of the innocents; ( , ) the lion's head being equally typical of the civil power, or of the devil devouring children; ( ) herod's daughter dancing, the head inverted precisely as represented at a later period in a sculpture on the portal of rouen cathedral; and ( ) the legendary ass worshipping at the manger, as the old monkish distich had it, “cognovit bos et asinus te magnus mundi dominus.” from the exteriors of churches we have the following specimens: ( ), the bars of the manger and an animal's head, from the apse (external wall) of st. sernin, toulouse; ( , ), heads, again, of attendant animals, from the exterior of st. jean, poitiers; ( ), the rage of satan, and ( ) a copy of a roman bracket, from the exterior of the tower chapel at the castle of beaucaire, near nismes; ( , , ), probably the heads of the founders, from the external wall of the apse of the cathedral of agen (lot et garonne); ( ), simple ornament, from the exterior of the mortuary chapel of montmajour, near arles; ( , ), a founder and his shield of arms, and ( , , ), a scroll and animals, from the exterior of st. porchaire, poitiers; ( ), the bird of night and of wisdom, from the exterior of the cathedral at le mans. the external corbels are thus shown to have been of a very mixed character. internally, however, contrary to what might have been expected, they are still more so; and that style of architecture (gothic) which we so often hear pronounced to be the only fit style for christian buildings contains subjects, and that in the most sacred precincts, which are frequently of the most disgusting grossness or the broadest burlesque. in poitiers cathedral ( th century), for example, round the naves and transepts are about three hundred corbels, of wonderful variety of character and great power of execution; of these we give thirteen which speak for themselves, and pass over others which are unfit for reproduction. in st. fredigonde (poitiers) are also about two hundred corbels of the most wild and grotesque character; and in notre dame de la couture (cultura dei), mans, another remarkable series, in all of which we find, not christianity, but the burlesque literature and jokes of the day graphically perpetuated in stone within the very holy of holies of the church, in mockery both of priests and altar. the abbey church of moissac (tarne et garonne) contains some very fine capitals, many of which are symbolical, but belonging to a period when symbolism - d illustrations of architecture and ornament. was losing its hold on art. the two sketches and , however, appear to symbolize, in the case of the lion and lioness holding lambs in their mouths, jesus and the church holding up the christian, whilst the nondescript animals, one of which is a kind of griffin, grasping geese in their mouths, represent the silly heathen who are a prey to the devil. flames form the central abacus ornament of the last, and an altar that of the first. mediaewal sculpture, from auxerre cathedral, france. pla " e a ly. it is the fashion of the day to compare the sculpture of the early pointed period with the works of greece and rome; and there is so far reason in the comparison, that we may admit the sculpture of this period to have been founded on principles derived from the best ancient models then available. to nicolo pisano is generally ascribed the rise and development of sculpture founded on ancient models which took place throughout europe during the th century. england has some fine examples of this period, of which those in the choir of lincoln cathedral are perhaps the most perfect. france is rich in them, and particularly have we been struck with the superior character of the sculpture on the façade of auxerre cathedral, which is probably early th century work. the cathedral itself is a noble specimen of the best periods of the gothic style, commenced in , and finished probably before . the subjects we have selected from auxerre are—cain denying knowledge of his brother abel after the murder (height about ft. in.); the almighty creating the sun, moon, and stars (about ft. in. high); prudence or wisdom, with a serpent round her waist (about ft. in. high); religion (?) raising a winged soul (about ft. in. high); and samson killing the lion ( ft. in. high);-this last is, so far as we know, a unique example of anatomical knowledge in mediaeval sculpture. to show the close resemblance of style between italian and cisalpine works, we have given a figure of the virgin from orvieto cathedral ( – ), of the pisano school. it is taken from agincourt's history of art by its monuments. description of the plates. medleval sculpture, from the faqade of lyons cathedral and auxerre cathedral. plate y y. among the many panel-sculptured façades of the french churches, that of lyons is perhaps the most elaborate. it has two hundred principal panels, besides several smaller ones on the returns of the three portals. they are apparently early th century work, and their themes are very various—legends and grotesques, old and new testament history, astronomical and natural history subjects, scenes of every-day life and artistic fancy, appear by turns. we illustrate a few which appear to us the most characteristic of those that can be approached sufficiently near to be carefully examined; and although perhaps not equal to the panels of the north porch of rouen cathedral ( th century), they are yet characterized by great freedom and vigour of design, as well as carefulness of execution. beginning at the left hand, upper row, we have ( , ), the devil, mounted on a goat, attacking a christian; ( ), the punishment of a back-biter; ( ), an ancient philosopher with donkey's feet,_from his head springs a schoolman; ( , ), games of the people; ( ), merman, wife, and young one; ( ), the punishment of carnality (?); ( ), a myth; ( ), mad as hares in march; ( ), a monk (?), half animal, combatting the devil with a leg of mutton; ( ), a composition from nature. all these designs are executed in half-relief, and are remarkable for their spirited action, truth to nature, and clever adaptation to the spaces which they are required to fill. entrance tower to willeneuve-les avignon, france pi, a te xxi. villeneuve-les-avignon, situated about a mile from avignon, on the opposite bank of the river rhone, is a very complete and interesting example of an old fortified town in the th century, the walls of which are still in a good state of preservation, although the domestic buildings are completely destroyed. the entrance gateway here illustrated is in a very perfect state, and shows the guard-house on top, chimneys, sentry-boxes, and principal staircase. the pro- illustrations of architecture and ornament. jecting piece nearer, forming portion of the main wall, consists of a sentry-box with fireplace, chimney, and external drain. the end of this wall is discon- nected from the entrance towers themselves, apparently for the purpose of pre- venting surprise by the enemy. the reader should consult m. violet le duc's excellent treatises on military architecture in his dictionnaire raisonné de l'architecture, for full descriptions of examples of mediaeval fortifications. this plate was etched by mr. a. goodier. triple chimney-place, in the salle-de-justice, poitiers. plate ya ii. the magnificent triple stone chimney-place of the salle-de-justice at poitiers is about thirty-six feet in length from pillar to pillar. it is a noble work of the th or early part of the th century, and is, we believe, a unique example of its class. it does not compete in elaborate ornament with the numerous and finely carved chimney-pieces of the th and th centuries, still preserved in france, and belgium especially; but then they only consist of one opening, whilst this possesses three fireplaces, which, when the great logs were all blazing at once, must have produced a grand effect; although even then they would barely suffice to warm the large hall in its entirety. placed as it is on a raised platform, it was intended probably mainly for the use of the chief officials and distinguished people; whilst the crowd in the hall rather saw the burning piles of wood on the capacious hearthstones, than felt the heat from them. for an account of the principal ancient french chimney-pieces, see le duc's dictionnaire, s. v. “cheminée.” mediaewal stone carwing, france and germany. pj, a te xxiii. the beautiful arrangements of natural foliage ( , , and ), from the wall of the choir of bordeaux cathedral, are probably of the th century. no. description of the plates. execution a rare combination of delicacy and force, of graceful design and power of light and shadow, obtained when required by means of deep or thorough undercutting, such as we have not seen equalled in any other works of the kind. honour to gil de siloe mediaeval sculpture, from san juan, toledo, spain. plate y_y vii, the cloisters of the church of san juan de los reyes, toledo, present a splendid series of figures and ornamental work, very finely carved in stone ( th century). the portion we have given is from the side of the church entrance, and represents a sainted martyr (as notified by the palm-branch), beneath an elaborate canopy. the statue is surrounded by that redundancy of foliated ornament, characteristic of the later period of the spanish gothic style, and which would offend good taste, were it not so admirably designed, and executed with such vigour and feeling for effect. in the cloisters of san juan de los reyes, between windows filled in with elaborate tracery, are ranged a series of statues with plinths and canopies, similar to the example given on this plate. the smaller pieces on the right represent a good arrangement of the pomegranate, and a very graceful stone finial belonging to one of the piers in another part of the cloisters. medleval carwing in wood, germany. pj, a te y x viii. the noble th century cathedral of magdeburg contains fine stalls of a later period, from one of which our illustration no. is taken. the panel sculptured in relief represents jesus brought before pilate, and by his side stands the executioner with his flat-ended sword. the carved cresting is a good example of that grotesque spirit which so frequently inspired the german gothic artist. ulm cathedral contributes (no. ) a finely-carved chest for priests' vest- ments. st. stephen's vienna, is peculiarly rich in beautifully carved work, both description of the plates. mediaewal carwing in wood, italy and france. plate x yx. the noble and interesting lombard romanesque church of san zeno, at verona, contains some stalls of the th century, carved and coloured, one of the divisions of which here given (no. ) is particularly bold and effective. its style indicates a german influence or origin, such as may be seen also on the richly carved stalls of the church of the frari at venice. the remaining subjects on this plate are good examples of late french gothic carving in wood, to be found on various pieces of furniture preserved in the museum of the hotel cluny at paris. the tracery of no. is open cut; and it is noticeable how boldly the sculptor has departed from the usual system of repetition of ornament above the arch-shaped opening, without losing a sym- metrical effect. - medleval carving in stone, toulouse and bordeaux. pi, a te xx xi. the portion of a stone doorway is from the lycée or government college of toulouse, a brick building, and formerly a religious house. it is a particularly good example of late gothic art, both as regards ornament and light and shade. the brickwork, as usual in the south of france, is excellent, the bricks being of close texture, large size, and a rich deep colour, alternating with well-marked thick beds of fine mortar. the stone benitier, or holy-water bason, is from a chapel in the church of st. michel, bordeaux, and its exuberant ornament is highly characteristic of the gothicized french renaissance practised in the early part of the th century. the top of the canopy, marked a, is shown by the side of the benitier. although the pelican feeding her young with her own blood, as seen in the corbel of the water-stoup, is an old christian symbol, the resusci- tation of heathen art is seen in the naked figure of fame blowing a trumpet, which surmounts it. illustrations of architecture and ornament. mediaewal stone-work, from warious sites. p la te a a y ii. we have already noticed various symbolic meanings of the lion in ancient sculpture. we here append two more examples of symbolism. no. , from the central pier of dijon cathedral portal, being clearly satan's head, nailed at the very entrance of the church, and made captive with an iron ring. in no. , from the façade of st. trophime, arles, a pillar of the church presses down the head of satan, who with his teeth gnaws in rage and despair at the holy scrip- tures, symbolized by the alternate torus and hollow mouldings. that these mouldings, when employed as a base to columns, are intended to represent the holy scriptures appears probable from their forming pedestals on which pillars rest, in several instances during the romanesque period, and notably in those of the cloisters of monreale cathedral, sicily. the capital formed by angels (no. ), also from the façade of st. trophime, arles, is a fitting apex to the pillar. the marble altar-table (no. ), from the south aisle of the cathedral, avignon, is interesting from its antiquity, being probably a work of the th century. it is hollowed out on the surface, like many others of the early romanesque period. an example almost identical with this is to be seen in the church of st. abbondio, como, ascribed to the th century, or even earlier. the stone-pillar lamp (no. ) is from the south portal of st. stephen's, vienna, and forms a graceful example of late german gothic art. no. is a specimen of wall-corbelling known in france as a “cul de lampe,” often very elaborate and effective, as at agen cathedral, the hotel jacques coeur, bourges, &c.; the present example is from the cathedral of carcassonne, and has been lately restored under m. violet le duc's direction. moorish capitals, from the alhambra, granada. pj, a te ata a / / /. this and the two plates immediately following present examples of the extreme delicacy and elegance of design characteristic of the hispano-arab works. these capitals and columns from the alhambra deserve especial notice description of the plates, for their well-considered beauty of proportion and design, and notably for the manner in which the small annular mouldings serve to harmonize the richness of the capitals with the shafts. when drawn by the author, these capitals were devoid of colour, and were dependent on their sculptured design for their effect, the colour of the marble having become by time of a beautiful warm mellow tint. we understand they have been lately restored; the colours, besides white and gold, being only blue and red—the usual scale of colour in moorish ornament. moorish ornament, from toledo and granada. p la te y y_y i v. this plate presents specimens of rich and graceful surface-decoration, prin- cipally from the alhambra. the ornament is in low-relief, executed in the finest cement, and depends greatly on colour for its effect, being picked out in gold on a blue or red ground. the example from the church of s. m. la blanca, toledo, occurs in the spandrils between the arches of the nave. it is bolder in effect than the others, and is equally graceful in point of design. this building was originally erected early in the th century as a jews' synagogue. moorish ornament, from granada and segovia. pi, a " e. ylyx v. in this plate nos. , , are from the alhambra, granada; the two lower subjects are in wood, that on the left is part of the frieze in the court of myrtles, that on the right is the soffit of a beam in the chapel, and both were originally rich with colour and gilding. the rosage is in cement from the lions' court, the half section a serves to show its relief. the portion of a ceiling ( ) from the alcazar, segovia, is of wood, coloured and gilt; style, late gotho-arabic of the th century; the form of the pendents and the amount of their projection from the ceiling will be more fully understood by the detail b. spain is rich illustrations of architecture and ornament. in similar ceilings, many of which would well repay illustration. at saragossa, guadalajara, toledo, and segovia are preserved some of the finest examples. this plate and the two preceding have been etched by mr. a. goodier. portion of the great “ corona” chandelier, hildesheim cathedral. pj, a te y a x vi. a distinguishing feature of the early romanesque churches was the “corona lucis,” or crown of light, notable examples of which are still preserved at aix-la- chapelle and at hildesheim. at hildesheim there are two, the largest of which, about feet in circumference, forms the subject of this illustration. it is stated to have been made and presented to the church by bishop hézilon in the th century. it is formed of copper, originally gilt, silvered, and perhaps coloured; the towers are open cut, and contained statuettes, the names of which alone remain; the upper parts of the towers probably served as lanterns. the name “saulus” on our plate should probably be “paulus,” as the names of apostles alternate with those of prophets from the old testament. the ornament between the inscriptions is open cut. figs. and show thorough-pierced ornament on the sides of the niches; fig. is a soffit of turret, open worked, the scroll-work gilt, with black central band; fig. is a leaf of this ornament somewhat enlarged; fig. , part of an arcade on left-hand lantern turret; fig. , a black inlay orna- ment on copper gilt, supporting the candlesticks; the figure at bottom shows a plan of the corona and its supporting chains. the pendent rods and bosses are plain laten or copper gilt. the upper inscription is too long for insertion here; its last lines are, “solis sol lucet in illa: mystica discernit, tenet, aspicit, omnia novit: et solium regni cordis locat in penetrali.” the lower inscription is the donor's offering prayer. neither kratz (der dom zu hildesheim) nor cahier, nor kugler, appear adequately to describe this noble specimen of romanesque art; a good description is still needed, and the writer regrets that he did not, at the time of making his drawing, take sufficient interest in early church art to induce him to make fuller notes regarding it. the student who desires farther information on the modes of lighting mediaeval buildings should consult m. cahier's learned and complete disserta- description of the plates. tion in the mélanges d’archéologie, by mm. cahier and martin; and le duc's dictionnaire du mobilier, s. v. “lampe.” the student of romanesque art should not fail to visit hildesheim, as he will find there treasures in bronze, stone, wood, textile art, goldsmiths' work, and illumination, in great quantity and of the highest interest, presented in old times to the cathedral by st. bernard, bishop hézilon, and other great abbots. laten font in the bruderkirche, brunswick. plate x yx vii. north germany is rich in artistic brass or laten work, of which this font in the bruderkirche, brunswick, is an excellent th century example. it is decorated with figures of the twelve apostles placed in richly sculptured niches. the figures are characterized by great truth to nature, variety of expression, and clever arrangement. the water-carriers beneath, though quaint, are very effective, and serve to give solidity to the rest of the design, while they lean against the font, rather than give it support. the effect of the font is greatly enhanced by the well-designed steps which lead up to it. it is with regret that we failed to discover the name of the artist. bronze monument of an archbishop, magdeburg cathedral. p la " e. v. a. y. viii. besides two remarkable and early gothic monumental slabs in bronze, somewhat like those at amiens, the fine cathedral of magdeburg possesses in the bronze monument of archbishop ernest von magdeburg, one of the most beautiful works extant of peter vischer. this monument, according to kugler, was completed a.d. . the date, however, on the monument itself fixes the death of the prelate in . among the numerous works of this great sculptor, who worked principally between the years and , this certainly takes a very high place, both as regards design and execution in metal work. the figure of the archbishop is finely rendered, his feet rest on a lion which supports g illustrations of architecture and ornament. the fine ornamental hinge (no. ), from a door in augsburg town-hall, is especially notable, both for its intrinsic merit and as being no doubt designed by elias holl himself, the palladio of augsburg, by whom the town-hall was built between the years – . no. shows a very graceful adaptation of the fleur-de-lis as a termination for an ornament in augsburg cathedral. no. , from an iron railing in ulm cathedral, illustrates the usual flower finial of the period ( th century); and no. , from one of the doors in same cathedral, is a good example of an iron handle probably executed early in the th century. this plate was etched by mr. a. goodier. ornamental iron work, from germany and holland. p la " e a l iii. fig. is a portion of a small open-worked circular chandelier in iron, of very graceful design, from magdeburg cathedral. fig. represents a portion of a chapel railing in the church of st. ulrich, augsburg, which is formed of thin flat strips of iron conjoined, and is exceedingly pleasing. the lion's head (fig. ), from a door in the choir of augsburg cathedral, is a fine and effective piece of ironwork, the ground of which appears originally to have been coloured. the dutch examples (figs. , ) show that quaintness of design which prevails in north german art. no. , from one of the side-chapels of the oudekerk, amsterdam, illustrates an adaptation of the sacred thorn to use as well as ornament; whilst the clever use of ordinary wattle-work in iron is observable in no. , which is a portion of a chapel grille in the church of st. bavon, haarlem. iron railing, fuggers chapel, st. ulrich, augsburg. pi, a te y l. i. v. the sepulchral chapels of the princely merchant family of fugger in the church of st. ulrich and st. afra at augsburg, are inclosed with ironwork of description of the plates. unfrequently admirable works of art. thus jachimo, describing cymbeline's chamber, says, “her andirons (i had forgot them) were two winking cupids of silver, each on one foot standing.” ornamental ironwork, from warious sites. plate y l. viii. the museum of toulouse is contained in a suppressed monastery, and in the middle of the cloister-green, placed over a well, is to be found the character- istic example of th century ironwork, heavy though elaborate, shown in no. . ironwork, of better design, for the same purpose, but of the th century, shown in no. , is from the entrance courtyard of the hotel cluny, paris. the mace-bearer, no. , from the town-hall, exeter, is intended to hold the large and smaller maces of the corporation. it is coloured red and green, and is parcel gilt. a plainer example of the same date ( th century) is to be seen in the cathedral there. the portions of railings, nos. and , from the cathedral of segovia, are th century work; and the finial (no. ), from the interior of the cathedral, toledo, is of the th century. the portion of a lamp-chain (no. ), is from st. francis, at assisi. the lamp- chains in italian churches are often of excellent design and effect; they consist generally of four angular pieces of projecting ornament springing from a central rod or chain, as seen in the specimen here illustrated. ornamental metal-work, from warious sites. plate xlix, the flower (front and side, no. and a), from the bronze doors of the cathedral of monreale, sicily, ( th century), is remarkably good, both in design and execution. the door-handle (no. ) and nail-head (no. ), from miraflores, near burgos, show the value of a suggestive model (the echinus or sea-urchin): they are of the latter part of the th century. the specimens illustrations of architecture and ornament. from north germany bear witness to the quaintness and originality of teutonic ornamental design. the two handles from hanover (nos. and ) are early th century work; that from wolfenbüttel (no. ), late th century. no. represents a small open-worked pendant lamp, probably of the th century, preserved in the national bavarian museum, munich. no. , an iron knocker (early th century), from a street in verona, a city containing many good examples of knockers and door-handles. in no. we have a good though small specimen of the torch-holders and rings common in central italy; it is from a palace near the podesta in arezzo, and also a work of the th century. no. is a bronze knocker of the th century, from the town- hall, lyons; and no. a door-handle of the same period, from a house at avignon. marble and stone brackets, from florence and pisa. pa, a " e. l. no. is from the noble marble pulpit of santa croce, florence, by benedetto da majano (a.d. – ). the sculptured portions of this bracket are beautiful, both in design and execution, but its general form contrasts unfavour- ably with no. , from a tomb in the cloisters of santa croce, dated a.d. . this, again, is inferior in form to no. , from the tomb of francesco ammanati, in the campo santo, pisa, dated a.d. ; and we consider all three are greatly inferior, in point of composition, to the marble bracket, no. , from the tomb of bonifazio della gherardesca, a.d. , in the same sacred cloister. all these are in white marble, with exception of no. , which is of stone. for other interesting monuments and sculpture in the campo santo, pisa, see raccolta di sarcofagi, d.c., by p. lasinio, florence. renaissance crestings, &c., in wood and stone. pj, a te li. the design of the finely carved stalls of san pietro, perugia, is ascribed to raffaelle. they are th century works of very high merit, and are illustrated, description of the plates. in outline, in the ornati della chiesa di s. pietro, perugia, typog puccinelli, rome, . this is, however, a very unsatisfactory work, as the fine play of light and shade characteristic of the sculpture is entirely wanting. no. is from the cresting of these stalls, and is of the highest merit both in design and execution. no. is an elbow-piece from one of the stalls. the cathedral and town-hall of perugia also possess fine examples of the same class of work, in walnut or other dark wood, richly carved, and relieved with gilding ( th and th century). specimens of these are given in nos. and . the part represented in no. is from a corner of the “banco dei magistrati,” a long and high chest behind which the authorities sat on a raised dais, the whole forming a large, elaborate, and finely carved piece of woodwork extending from the floor up to the ceiling. the intarsiatura of the town-hall is signed “marcus antonius mercatelli,” a cinque-cento artist from la marca. as good crestings in the early italian style are not common, we have ventured to give one, executed in stone (no. ), from the old louvre: the crescent and flame are the insignia of diana de poitiers, circa a.d. . we believe that this cresting no longer exists, but the original engraving of it may be seen in paris et ses monumens, by baltard; paris, – . ornamental stonework, from palermo and bologna. plate l ii. the garden-wall of a villa near palermo, on the road to monreale, appeared so well proportioned as to merit illustration: the lower portion of this wall forms a continuous stone bench the whole length of the garden, the ovals are perforated and should be perfectly symmetrical in outline, the failure of the etching, in this respect, mars their appearance. the ornamental rustication (no. ) is from the portico de' banchi, piazza san petronio at bologna, and has a very rich effect. it is to be found in the angle-piers of the portico, and is said to have been executed from a design by vignola. among the great variety of rusticated work, which was employed with such excellent effect by some of the best masters of the renaissance and italian schools, it is not often that ornamental designs of this description are to be found; nor, indeed, as a i illustrations of architecture and ornamient. rule, do we consider the practice desirable: though in the present instance the delicacy of workmanship lends a charm to the wall face which it would not other- wise possess. ornamental stonework, from florence and siena. p la ' e l iii. among the many beautiful fountains in the various royal florentine gardens, the little one in marble (no. ), from bellosguardo, is remarkable for the beauty of its sculpture. it is probably the joint work of tacca and giovanni di bologna. the stepped parapet (no. ), from the boboli gardens, is of the kind called “goulettes” by the french gardeners, as described by t. james in his theory and practice of gardening, london, . the utter decline of hydrotechny at the present day is greatly to be regretted, seeing that it is capable of the most beautiful and artistic effects in combination with architecture and sculpture. the column from siena (no. ), stands in front of the cathedral, and is a work of the early cinque-cento or late quattro-cento school. the wolf, with romulus and remus, forms the city ensign; the iron- work is for the support of a banner-staff. a palace gateway and a church-tower, walladolid, spain. plate l / v. the portals of the fabio nelli palace, valladolid, and of the house at segovia (no. , plate lv.), serve to illustrate the fine effect obtained by large voussoirs, which are so much employed in the north of spain. italian architec- ture, transplanted into spain, had engrafted on it the massive and yet florid character which distinguishes most of the buildings of that country. the palaces are often exceedingly rich and effective, arising in great measure from the boldness of the arched openings, and deeply cut carved ornaments, amongst which a large shield of armorial bearings placed at the angle of the wall, like those of florence, usually forms an important feature. the tower of the church s illustrations of architecture and ornament. religions of asia. notice in the one here figured the lions on each side of the sacred tree or “hom,” griffins and fire-altars, and subjects relating to the chase as practised rather in the east than in europe. much light is thrown on the use of these emblems of fire-worship in an excellent paper by m. lenormant, on the “anciennes Étoffes du mans et de chinon” in the learned work by mm. cahier and martin, mélanges d'archéologie. renaissance ornamental sculpture, italy and france. pa, a " e. l. a. the bronze tap (no. ), about , inches high, preserved in the museum of the hotel cluny, paris, and the pendant bronze lamp (no. ), from the museum at dijon, are both good specimens of italian work of the th century. the small alabaster figure of fame (no. ) and the wood colonnette (no. ), both from the hotel cluny, are respectively good examples of th and th century work. the former appears to be of the french school, and the latter is either french or flemish, it would be difficult to decide which: it forms one of the supports of a piece of furniture, and is very boldly carved in walnut-wood, with much through-cutting, giving excellent effects of light and shade. the artistic value of the preceding eramples. the principal points that constitute the artistic value of this series of examples of ornament, and render them attractive, are, first, a keen apprecia- tion of what is artistic in natural objects; second, the power of adapting them to the purpose in view by a greater or less amount of conventional or artificial treatment; third, vigour rather than delicacy of execution. except in delicate objects meant to be closely inspected, refinement of execution is destructive of effect, and worse than useless. in architectural ornament a telling effect is only to be obtained by bold and deep cuttings, that give expression to a well- drawn and well-marked character in the design. proportion and chiaro oscuro are the two most powerful constituents of all that is good in architecture, as in art generally. on the adaptation of plant-forms to ornament, and on devices for the faqades of buildings. the illustrations of plant-forms that follow have been selected from numerous studies of plants made by the author. the greater number have been chosen with a view to their adaptability to carved work, and suitableness for producing marked effects of light and shade. in laying them before his fellow-students, he would seek to impress upon them the importance of obtaining an acute sense of the peculiar beauties of outline and character observable in fruit, flowers, and leaves, fine examples of which, suitable for ornament, are to be seen in the pine- apple, passion-flower, sunflower, dahlia, sea-kale, savoy cabbage (leaves of the latter class frequently and effectively used in the late gothic architecture of north spain), sea-thistle, spinach, sycamore, maple, &c. the difference of expres- sion caused by the slightest variation of curve and proportion may readily be noticed in any collection of birds' eggs: hardly any two are perfectly alike, and though all are ovoid in form, there is really a distinct character in each—from the exquisite grace of the wood-pigeon's to the heavy beauty of the hawk's egg. this fact, and it is an undoubted one, should serve to impress on the mind of the architectural designer the great importance of care and study in the outlines of the most ordinary mouldings, as well as in their concomitant enrichment. in that development of architectural art to which we confidently look for- ward, and signs of which indeed are even now visible throughout europe, we desire to see the entire animal, vegetable, and mineral kingdoms explored for original and suitable motives for sculptured decoration, conventionally treated and adapted to the main characteristics of the style which they serve to adorn. nature has in part been heretofore so made use of in all the styles of the antique past, and to a greater extent perhaps in the picturesque development of architec- ture during the middle ages, than in any other. in symbolism the highest phi- description of the plates. plants suitable for sculpture. plate l x i v. nos. and a represent the common artichoke; the lower figure when young, the upper when nearer to maturity. these and the cactuses ( and a) on each side at top are, with slight adaptation, suited for finial knops for standards in wood, stone, or metal. one of these cactuses is drawn as seen from above. nos. and serve to illustrate the tomato or love-apple fruit and leaves, and the value given to an object by unequal divisions. no. is enlarged and conven- tionally arranged for the purpose of ornament, from the calyx and seed-vessel of a small plant the name of which i have not been able to ascertain. plants suitable for sculpture. pla. t e l x v. the figures a, b, d, and c, represent the buds, leaves, and fruit of the water- melon (cucurbitaceae), a plant peculiarly adapted for architectural ornament; both for form and light and shade it is excellent. the figures e and f represent a stem and leaves of the spurgewort (euphorbiaceae); the curved arrangement of the upper large leaves is very suggestive for the designer. plants suitable for sculptured ornament. p la ' e l x vi. no. –leaves, flower, and fruit of the stramonium or thorn-apple (datura stramonium), and a portion of the flower enlarged. no. –leaf and fruit of the castor-oil plant (ricinus communis). no. –leaf and fruit of the common caper-plant (capparis spinosa). no. –leaves and fruit of a species of kidney- bean (phaseolus). no. –leaves and flower of the bee-orchis. no. —leaves of wood-sorrel (oxalis acetosella). this plant, which is frequently three-leaved, is considered by writers on botany to be the shamrock of ireland, and .not the illustrations of architecture and ornament. clover, as usually supposed. all the examples here given are from the tor- rigiani and boboli gardens, florence. plants suitable for sculptured ornament. plate l a vii. nos. , , , and –leaves and fruit of the common arum or wake-robin (arum maculatum), by form and capacity for holding shadow, especially suited for architectural ornament. the centre leaf, drawn from a plant in the torrigiani gardens, is one of the cannas, a genus of plants which have of late years come much into favour for the adornment of gardens. remarkably fine examples of cannas may be seen in the sub-tropical garden in battersea park. flowers suitable for ornament. pa, a te a, a v///. no. —the “giglio,” florentine, or white lily. no. —the turk's-head lily. the exquisite curves of flowers of the lilium class are full of suggestion to the designer, and all of them deserve to be studied. no. –leaves, buds, and flowers of the iris germanica. the upper piece shows the arrangement of the flowers, as seen from above. the iris, and not the lily, is evidently the origin of the fleur-de-lis, if it is of floral origin at all. plants suitable for ornament, p/, a ' e l a vat. in the centre (no. ) is a fine specimen of the helleborus foetidus, drawn in spain. the arrangement of leaves at the base is suggestive for a pendent boss. e shows the peculiar shape of the leaves near the ground, and d the flower in bloom. the small piece (no. ) is also from spain, but i have been unable to ascertain the name of the plant. no. is a very graceful example of the wild chive (class allium), the flowers of which enlarged are shown at f as naturally description of the plates. arranged. a a show the leaf and the curvature of its section. no. is of the spurgewort class (euphorbiaceae). its flowers are shown at b and c, the latter as seen from above. both of these were drawn at nice. plants suitable for ornament. i? i, a t e l y.y. at the top, no. represents a bit of hedge-bedstraw (galium mollugo), a very graceful creeper, common in our hedges. in the centre (no. ) are stems and leaves of the common briar. the lowest piece (no. ) represents a stem, leaves, and immature fruit of the gooseberry. these last specimens afford clear proof that it is not necessary to seek far away for excellent subjects for artistic pleasure and practical use. the whole secret of beauty is found in the excellent story that most of us have read in our youth, called “eyes and no eyes:” there is no lack of material for the artist's use, if he will only learn to see it, and learn how to apply it. nature abounds and is overflowing with beauty, and not the commonest plant of our hedges, the most ordinary vegetable, the smallest feather of a bird, but is replete with a beauty of form and a perfection of structure which we may learn to appreciate, and must seek in our humble way to imitate and apply artistically, if we desire to produce what will be permanently pleasing, and to form a work of beauty not subject to the capricious fancies of mere fashion. m univers! i y ur illinois library at urbana-champaign notice: *, *, * v- anc" all library materials! the minimum fee for each lost boat , ~ . . the person charging this material is responsible for its return to the library from which it was withdrawn on or before the latest date stamped below. theft, mutilation, and underlining of books are reasons for discipli- nary action and may result in dismissal from the university. to renew call telephone center, - university of illinois library at urbana-champaign mar & j. : * * - - - * * * * | * crl | i.e.-- - - - - *-* --- £ j' - - - - - - - l –o- **** - *############: - ker ußrapy of architecturt. q () % c_\ u'sin of £ . £ . bit!»onaib lobell. | | | } £ . alt: donal hobeil. .cq . . s q.h. pol-l&y. f’u slash: côort. s.t. g * <> * . - . r & $ostor} . %. .# - . |- entered accor ding to act of congress in the year iss: by c. o. h. pe.… & co., in the office or the lib rian or congress at washington, d. c. : . £: ' ', s', '…. ... . . . . . . .". --> --> * ~ *--- introduction. × have given the following examples of indian architecture as nearly every traveller would see them, beginning with ahmedabad nearest to bombay, and ending with multan. as will be seen, this does not follow the chronological order, but rather the gradual change from the hindoo to the mohammedan style, as one goes north, and only includes the period from a. d. to the present time. in ahmedabad the mosques are built of yellow sandstone, and they are all purely jain in detail, often constructed entirely from older jain temples. this gives them a peculiar style of their own, and they form one of the most interesting groups in the whole of india. here, too, the stone tracery has been brought to its highest perfection. the old palace is a strange contrast, showing no trace of jain influence. the date of these buildings is to . i would call special attention to the construction of the houses; it is the best i have ever seen, being a heavy-timbered frame, with a second one inside, some three feet from the outside one, and the two bound together with beams which show both inside and out. the whole is filled in with stucco. teak, the wood used, is certainly the most durable in the world. the very elaborate carving of the fronts and court yards lasts for centuries. i have examples which have been exposed to the weather for over two hundred years, and they are as sound as the day they were put up. the climate is much more severe on wood than our own, which we think the worst to be found. the lasting qualities of teak are due to the wood being full of natural oil which never dries out, so that any filler, oil, varnish or paint is entirely unnecessary. shet huttusing temple, built some forty years ago, furgusson speaks of as the finest modern building and the clearest proof that native architecture is not dead. i am a little doubtful about the houses attributed to ajmir, as they may be at lahore or amritza. they show the curious mixture of the hindoo and mohammedan in the same work. the palace at amber, the old capital of jeypore, contains the finest examples of shish work in india. no one who has not seen this wonderful inlay of mirror pieces can form any conception of its beauty. they are cut from large glass globes, i i i + . which gives each piece a convex surface, entirely removing all idea of looking-glass. the effect is more that of rounded surfaces of polished steel. i would refer the reader to fur- gusson's indian architecture for descriptions of akbar's palace at futtchpur sikri, the palace at agra, and the tombs and palace at delhi. the examples of houses at amritza lahore and multan are as interesting in their style as those of ahmedabad, though inferior in their construction. the shisham and deodar are substituted for the teak, which does not grow much north of bombay. the very odd little bay windows are rather the feature of the lahore streets, while one is struck by the great beauty of the red sandstone door- ways in multan. in the study of architecture in the east the houses have been neglected, so we find few illustrations of them. i think they are really more instructive than many of the mosques and temples. no country affords a greater variety than india, where each city has its own peculiarities in detail and plan. i can only hope that i have been able to stimulate in some, at least, the desire to know more of this wonderful oriental art which is so rapidly disappearing. lockwood de forest. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii. viii. ix. x. xi. xii. xiii. xiv. xv. xvi. xvii. xviii. xix. xx. xxi. xxii. xxiii. xxiv. xxv. xxvi. xxvii. xxviii. xxix. xxx. xxxi. xxxii. xxxiii. xxxiv. xxxv. xxxvi. xxxvii. xxxviii. xxxix. xl. xli. xlii. xliii. xliv. xlv. xlvi. xlvii. xlviii. xlix. l. #, "...sonato youtu. contents. mosque at ahmedabad. moohafiz khan's mosque, aiimedabad. details rani sipre mosque, ahmedabad. niche * * * * * * * * circular bay window of a house. ahmedabad. bay window of a house. aiimedabad. house at ahimedabad. door of the old palace, (used as the jail,) aiimedabad. interior of thie old palace. ahmedabad. shet huttusing temple. aiimedabad. details of the front of a house. ajmir. bay window of a house. ajmir. - bay window of a house. ajmir. door of the palace at amber. ceiling, doorway of palace, amber. court of the palace, amber. the walls are covered with shish work. ceiling of shish work. amber. room in the palace, amber. walls and ceiling of shish work. old door in the palace. amber. old door in the palace. amber. the sultan's kiosk, akbar's palace, futtehpore, sikri. zenana in the palace at agra, shah jehan. white marble inlaid with precious stones. zenana pavilion, palace at agra. tomb of altumsh, old delhi. interior of the tomb of ala ud-din khilji. interior of a tomb, old delhi. ceiling of a tomb, old deliii. interior of a mosque, brick tile and mosaic work. interior of the same mosque. interior of the palace delhi. house in the bazar, amritza. window of a house, amritza. bay window at amritza. * window at amritza. inlaid marble sikh work, amritza. gilded copper doors, sikh work, amritza. dome of the great mosque, la hore. jehan gir. celling in the great mosque, lahore. street in the bazar, la hore. bay window, la hore. old bay window in the museum, la hore. house at la hore. interior of a house, probably multan. doorway, punjab. door of the great mosque, multan. tomb at multan. glazed tiles. details of tomb at multan. house at multan. doorway of a house at multan. doorway of a house at multan. _ ! g: ''e *werc.t., (, ill., . ii. | - geo. h. polle on. y & co., publishers, bosi moohafi. karn's mosque, ahmedabad *- • * at (, | * **t --- cl to | aft ... ." #. #| || - - | -- - #########|| - - geo. h. polley & co., publishers, boston. details ran. sipre mosque, ahmedabad. / g. a # * * c# : s ... / c. he un!"ef. t. cf ill'us wi. || - # - geo. h. polley & co., publishers, boston. bay window of a house ahmedabad l....…? cr ihe !". " " c. (l'o's vii. | | #| *- i: * : *- # * : - - - -- 't - --- geo. h. polley & co., publishers, boston. - - - - ----- -- - -- - l't' *…*. - - - - - - - - - house at ahmedabad, * . < l. ...? ë, ire "… ". . . c. - c's | || # l., ... .y the tly wrf. t. ce l'u - f ... [ae ! …' rl, v cf # l' : xi. --|---- ff - - - # *t : * f <> s | f - |- - - - - - - - #- # # ! - *! #. . " - details of the front of a house, ajmir. geo. h. polley & co., publishers, boston. xii. --- - |- | - - s' z . , , y y y y y w. y w. w. y w y w y y y y v v w v w w y | y y | | w ajmir, bay window of a house, geo. h. polley & co., publishers, boston. s xv. geo. h. polley & co., publishers, boston. g, doorway of palace, amber, * | ceilin læ' c: i'e | " " "r" - " " : ". . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - c. *-**** ** # # - . . ...? c. :#e i: " : " (, l'u' : e:======= - ". . - … - - - - - - -- . | * - - - l -- xx. | :# | | geo. h. polley & co., publishers, boston. old door in the palace, amber, -o-, ...? £ e '''c' v. c.: * * * * * * --- is *** # #!'" # #. i - * - - | - - s| *#:||-. -|.- *s .| -- -#s.| || . . - $==- :# .-## - ~. #-> -: % - --- - | | - | …? c: i'e * * * **, * - u - us … :* | -- | —: xxvii, £ # - #. . . .''. - - s(a: e - --- - \ |-> - * :s * |- # #. *::\,. " - - * - | % % *% # -- # - £ - aapn … [. j. - £ £# - - - -- -- - - t - - ***** s&# - iz. £ t * - -: už % # £ - - '. £ . . £ * # - : - ". # # . # # | * - £ afty- % * * # | # |- - - | '% * £ Ż - |- - a . £ -- a. ) , # - £ | * £ /... - geo. h. polley & co., publishers, boston. ceiling of a tomb, old delhi, !. l., …? c #e "r * *** ------> * * c. * * * * * -***** q * l. . . y c: he * f : ['ols l.- …? (, he '''r.c. ( (. . ...u.s xxx, | | . |- are: interior of the palace delhi, #- Ž ** - *|| --- *~~~~~ # - | l #. - . - - # xxxiii. lišnish: - #. Čiž * #: #:*: # * - - - - - - - - |- - - - - - - - - - - - *-i- - # *-* - -: - - - --- -- == -- - - == - - . . --- - bay window. a.t amritza, ** c. : re ! {}v: , y cf ll'u:s #: --> £ - - - - - - - |- - | | - || || - | - | - |- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - | ehi-, - . - |- - - - - =- geo. h. polley & co., publishef's, boston. inlaid marble sikh work, amritza. xxxvii, q . | & . | geo. h. polley & co., publishers, boston. dome of the great mosque, la hore, jehan gir. . he f'''/epct (f ll'u' xxxix. geo. h. polley & co., publishers, bost.on. street in the bazar, lahore * ... ... ? g, the i'vepcty cf || l:us xl. - - - - - - - - - -- - - - *.*.*.*.*. - - - , publishers, boston. geo. h. polley & co. bay window, lahore, u- ? the it'vrney gf "l' | || |- --- - *-*--> ----- - - - - - - -- - --- --- * h :... ? c. he it "vfp'ty of || lmus xliv, *: fa % *"- * # % s, boston. geo. h. polley & co., publisher doorway, punjab, xlv. || -| - | - - . --- - - - --~ geo. h. polley & co., publishers, boston. door of the great mosque, multan, gift of michael reese ersitatis calif sigillvm ir ex libris || knight's gy pianina d ornaments reese library of designed for the use of architects. builders. silversmiths. chasers. modellers. jewellers. die sinkers. engravers. founders. carvers and all ornamental manufacturers. university california s iroton d f ezራቅ! sc of the of edinburgh. thomas c. jack, india buildings. ? ? reese library cale / of the it [ reese library unitsesity colie reese libsary university california of the pas de einght inlo is tit! li reese cfte university california reese i aray university califo of ti i pundit rilithwaite se •hy reest univi, ity cale andre g pay da e. topharm so. . reese uniti ty calhosa kel lig : univepsity, californ ! reege ( unite city cafoto rin unive ty caf ell, peese iuniersity california . jiran reese le ce the university calfopna golem emil rlegt isini cal soen. fmaht c. tm dr. knight so reese liar 'cete univisi כצייר, א' א fbright sc reegs unit calm berlin b.cfurni's de paterson sc. reesta (on ty univ; calif... or tutti t t'bury del kann si هد ر پر . ل ، رقم دی "f reese univ), С chun uma cf the reese library univit ; california .. cf the reese library univiesity cal ܂ ܕܐ reese library university of the . codec وان هو reese lidsary university calfornia of the . . irritor.drel, h ( " tart pix . ری الو . ر where" reese library university california of the of . n.gunune del reese library cft university califosina of . jamaz winprimee.in reese library of the universiti cales os . from lc pore. reese library universit calife of the sss hecy edot reese library university california cf the с a reese lieray Ο nite, hity c. . city . mariage pidur reese libras Сf tчe . re b. betts del , theda ane ber fdse libery university olaf nerse liblity c the ity reese library university of the of the rffse library university califor reese library university ce the 《 ) 에 ​ reese library university califogna of the ta . reese library university calena of the of the reese library university cf. californa 会​学 ​ reese library of the university california of (。 reese library (university california of the و (و۔ reese library university california of the اور ولا reese library university oona СЕ thЕ ب دے رو دان reese library university california of the ocd reese library university of the © se of the reese library university california of peese ita, ΟΝΙΣΕ Υ. caτ ។ 第一 ​ of the reese library university california ! reese library university california of the of the reese library university california reese library university california cf the of the reese library university califosna l of the reese library nivirsity calfen of reese lasare university of the کوک reese library univesity of the reese library (university of the ] a truht dil eh cabejo reese lira (i the unipiosity calea kan pap del r.hebblethwaite sr reese lerated tviversity of the jai jonim dr. reese libe of the university ور در بود ساب yr kr. . . ப எ g missn) jren da eduirt to ii/ دور دور ما الره i page del. reese library unitiesity recse library univefsity na 。 reese library university california of the مراحل (( wright del r hbbla matese reese library university cf the resse library university ca of the y l , fr library СЕ ТРЕ univefsity conta ij . sirten det reese iart unit Сf te sity cam mwh dil r. birkerja . tlright di r.hebblahmute sc. a loc.in bild w as 家 ​mc cort j. paur du. reese library unito,sity cf the emright sc g ما مه زار و و دارند වදන, c , bury del * #lu. :// .;- . mum dil reese library the se linery tty if reese library university slife of the . kights ornaments wilt di rb dherdia reese library university cf the go to . wright del tdicks em itine iiidiina . reese library university of the a wright flipham se of the reese library university california, ni r scill h sie bi pirnes dh r.bakerfi reese library university only of the bc puniis del i huitteviti reese library university of the fora . partizan Ꭼ j. page del a , a , btc uutuus artes scientia an library veritas of the yof michigan university of mi tuebor the m sucris peninsulam circumspice circu inihihir mitim widudluginimui) wilminniwini ammum manning nk d nk ,d lettering in ornament companion volume to this alphabets old and new with over complete alphabets, series of numerals, and many fac- similes of ancient dates. other works by the same author. some principles of every-day art. second edition the anatomy of pattern. fourth edition. the planning of ornament. third edition. nature in ornament. third edition. windows; a book about stained and painted glass. second edition. art in needlework; a book about embroidery. second edition. lettering ornament in : an enquiry into the decorative use of lettering, past, pre- sent, and possible by lewis f. day author of 'alphabets old and new,' 'art in needlework,' etc. with numerous illustrations, old and new london: b. t. batsford high holborn nk dag lettering in ornament companion volume to this alphabets old and new with over complete alphabets, series of numerals, and many fac- similes of ancient dates. other works by the same author. some principles of every-day art. second edition the anatomy of pattern. fourth edition. the planning of ornament. third edition. nature in ornament. third edition. windows; a book about stained and painted glass. second edition. art in needlework; a book about embroidery. second edition. lettering in ornament an enquiry into the decorative use of lettering, past, pre- sent, and possible by lewis f. day author of 'alphabets old and new,' 'art in needlework,' etc. with numerous illustrations, old and new london: b. t. batsford high holborn bradbury, agnew, & co. ld., printers, london and tonbridge. seed - - elh preface. this is not so much a sequel to “ alphabets old and new” as that is preliminary to this. the earlier volume dealt with the alphabet only, the forms of letters: the consideration is here their use in ornament, the way they have been and are to be employed in decoration. the illustrations (of which a descriptive list is given) are chosen strictly with a view to illustrate, which will account for the introduction of my own designs : it was not possible always to find the fitting instance, and an obvious way out of the dilemma was to make a drawing. incidentally, however, the examples of old work here brought together show how universal was the use of lettering in ornament, how varied, how ingenious, and at times how beautiful. haply they may serve as incentives to fresh invention; in any case they are valuable object- lessons in decorative treatment. my point of view, it is hardly necessary to say, is that of the workman-who, if he is a good workman, is something of an artist too; and note of acknowledgment. i am indebted in many quarters: to mr. r. anning bell, mr. walter crane, mr. raffles davidson, mr. harry soane and miss b. a. waldram, for the use of their designs or drawings; to herren gerlach and schenk, the imprimeries réunies, herr von larisch, mr. harry soane and messrs. h. virtue & co., ltd., for allowing reproductions from their publications ; to miss gimingham, for the loan of photographs; to the rector of stonyhurst college, for sanctioning the illustration of queen mary's prayer-book ; to the authorities of the british and victoria & albert museums, and especially to mr. a. b. skinner and mr. g. f. hill, for valuable assistance in the production of this book. , ) ۔ contents. chap. page . . . . . introductory . . the printed page . ii. the printed page . . . . . i iii. the written page. . monumental inscri ptions v. decorative lettering . . . . . vi. inscribed labels or scrolls . . .. vii. hidden meanings viii. conjoined letters . . . . . . monograms x. cyphers . . . . . xi. ornamental lettering . xii. initial letters . . . . . . xiii. ornamental initials xiv. pictorial initials . . xv. lettering and ornament . · . . · · descriptive list of illustrations. . frame of a purse or bag, with the lilies of france and inscription incised. found in england. th century. (b. m.) . russian ms. . pali buddhist ms. . icelandic inscription, carved in wood. . arabic inscription, from a stone slab in the mosque at cordova . leaf of a diptych, carved in ivory, with subjects relating to the nativity, etc. rhenish. th century. (b. m.) . carved drawer fronts, from a gothic cabinet. the letter a in the word fata deliberately bisected by the framing. french. (cluny museum.) . tracery window, from the refectory of the hospital of s. cross, with quarries bearing the motto of cardinal beaufort, whose arms occupy the centre of the light. english perpendicular gothic. about the middle of the th century. (winston.) . bronze medal of the italian renaissance. (v. & a. m.) . decorative panel—perseus and the graeæ-in gesso upon oak, the inscription in raised gilt letters-by sir e. burne- jones. ii. part of an embroidered stole. the inscription, worked into the gold background, so far lost in it as merely to break the basket-stitch diaper. roumanian, xii descriptive list of illustrations. . woodcut initials, from a book printed at bâle in the th century. . metal cover of a crystal cup, in the uffizi at florence, pierced and enamelled with the cypher of henri deux. french. th century. (h. havard's “ dictionnaire de l'ameublement.” quantin.) . glazed encaustic tile, with part of a latin inscription from the book of job, xix. . found in sussex. dated . (b. m.) . from a jewellery design, by h. holbein. (print-room, b. m.) . marks of the printers, jaques huguetan and mathew huz, lyons. , . . rough sketch for a newspaper heading. (l. f. d.) . poster, by r. anning bell.. . parchment grant to a hospital in burgos, by alfonso the wise, surrounded by inscription, signo del rey don alfonso, and confirmation of juan garcia, in concentric circles. spain, . (b. m.) . inscription by joseph plénick, of vienna.. (beispiele rünstlerischer schrift. herr von larisch.) . inscription by otto hupp, of munich. (beispiele rünst- lerischer schrift. herr von larisch.) . diagram, to show letter-spacing. . diagram, to show construction of roman letters. . title-page to w. eden nesfield's “specimens of mediæval architecture." . . bronze plate, from the grave of veit stoss, the sculptor. nuremberg. german, . (“die bronce- epitaphien der friedhöfe zu nürnberg." gerlach a schenk, vienna.) descriptive list of illustrations. xiii . back of a pinewood stall, from the church of s. valen- tine, kiedrich. carved by erhart falkener, of abensperk. flat lettering grounded out, the words separated by inter- mediate ornament. german, . (** monumental-schrif- ten vergangener jahrhunderte.” gerlach & schenk, vienna.) . inscribed panel under the pulpit in the cathedral at siena. marble, the letters in relief. italian. . . inscription panel, from the tomb of mary of burgundy, in the church of notre dame at bruges. -- . . inscription on the tomb of benozzo federighi, in the church of s. trinità, florence, by luca della robbia, the letters incised in marble. . . inscribed panel, from the shrine of s. simeon, at zara in dalmatia. silver, embossed and gilt. the work of francesco di antonio, of sesto. . . cast-iron grave slab, from the church of s. jacobi, lübeck. . (“monumental-schriften vergangener jahrhunderte.” gerlach & schenk, vienni.) . latin inscription, in ribbon-like gothic character, from a mural brass at s. peter's church, cologne. . (from a rubbing by w. h. james weale in the library at v. & a. m.) . diagram to show the fitting together of letters so as to avoid as much as possible open spaces of ground between. . slab outside the church of s. emmeran, regensburg, cut in sandstone. (“monumental-schriften vergangener jahr- hunderte.” gerlach & schenk, vienna.) . bronze grave plate. (“: die bronce-epitaphien der fried- höfe zu nürnberg." gerlach & schenk, vienna.) . carved pew-end. english. th century. from a sketch by raffles davison. . part of a belt–iron inlaid with silver. byzantine. (b. m.) xiv descriptive list of illustrations. . leaf of a diptych, carved in ivory. th century. (b. m.) . part of a wooden door at the cathedral of le puy. flat carving grounded out. inscribed on the upright post is the name of the artist. (compare with .) french. th century. . cover of the gospels, with slavonic inscriptions, repoussé, silver gilt. . . enlargement of an engraving on copper, by hans sebald beham. german. . (b. m.) . grave stone, with incised inscription, from the island of gotland. . . glazed earthenware loving cup, decorated in clay of different colours. staffordshire. th century. (b. m.) . part of a carved wooden door, with moresque ornament and inscription in gothic character by way of border. spanish. th century. (musée des arts décoratifs, paris.) . part of an iron door, diapered with the arms of leon and castille. inscription, by way of border, beaten up. in the cathedral at toledo. . silver tetradrachms. a. reverse, with crab and bow in case, and the inscrip- tion, kqion moexin. cos, island off asia minor. rd century b.c. b. obverse, with a bee (symbol of artemis) and the letters, e = ephesus. th century b.c. c. reverse, with vine and the inscription, eni mhtpo. aoto. maronea, a city of thrace. th century b.c. (all in the b. m.) . silver tetradrachms.' d. reverse, with the figure of zeus and the word ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΥ ; coin of the types of alexander the great, probably issued after his death. b.c. – . . descriptive list of illustrations. xv e. reverse, with figure of athene and inscription, bazi. aene antifonoy. antigonus, king of macedon. b.c. – . f. reverse, with figure of zeus, and the inscription ΒΑΣΙΛΕΥΟΝΤΟΣ ΑΓΑΘΟΚΛΕΟΥΣ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΥ, “in the reign of agathocles the just." bactria. nd century b.c. g. reverse, with figure of zeus, and the inscription ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΝ ΑΡΣΑΚΟΥΣ ΕΥΕΡΓΕΤΟΥ aikaiot enimanoye miaeaahnoz. parthia. b.c. — . h. reverse, owl in a wreath of olive, with inscription npianzi. nyptiaŁ. ka. priansus, a city of crete. nd century b.c. .) .) bronze medals. italian. th century. . bronze medal, with two inscriptions, the one raised, the other sunk, italian. th century. . inscribed label, from a gothic stained-glass window. the letters picked, with a pointed stick, out of solid paint. english. th century. . panel, from the choir of albi cathedral. the name of the prophet (or as much of it as the artist thought necessary to identification) incised upon the background, the quota- tion on a label. . part of a reading desk, with the arms of france and savoy, letters l, and scrolls inscribed sperandum ac feren- dum; carved in ivory and painted. french. th century. (in the possession of mr. salting.) . gothic tapestry, with figures and inscribed scrolls. french. th century. (cluny museum.) . ) plaques of faÏence. inscribed labels used to occupy the .) background. gubbio. th century. . enlarged bookplate. inscription not following the con- volutions of the label. engraved on copper by hans sebald beham. german. . (b. m.) xvi descriptive list of illustrations. . engraving on copper. the alphabet inscribed on a scroll h. s. beham. (b. m.) . part of a square carpet. the ornament consists almost entirely of inscribed scrolls. german. (v. & a. m.) . cypher and inscribed labels, designed for the “ art journal illustrated catalogue of the exhibition of ," by w. harry rogers. (h. virtue & co.) . the words secundum lucam, from a manuscript of the gospels. german. th century. . two names, charles and maud, intermingled with symbolic and decorative intent. (l. f. d.) . gothic pew-end, with letter g used decoratively. from a church in somersetshire. th century. . iron bolt-plates in the form of a letter f. french. period of françois ier. . border of a page from “the book of wedding days." branches of the brier rose, appropriate to the month, spell june. designed by walter crane. . engraved panel, in which florid gothic foliage resolves itself, upon examination, into the at first unsuspected word israel, and (sideways) the letter m. subsidiary labels bear mottoes “ da gloriam deo," etc. from a print (in which, however, the design is reversed), engraved by israel van meckenen. german. th century. (b. m.) . the letters r.l.l.s.v, coloured, with so little regard to shape as further to disguise already florid forms. embroidered, border-wise, on linen. german gothic. (v. & a. m.) . golden votive crown, found near toledo. suspended from it in the form of a fringe are the letters reccessvinthus, in cloisonned mosaic of coloured stones. visigothic workmanship of the th century. (cluny museum.) . merchant's mark, in relief upon a bronze memorial tablet at nuremberg. . descriptive list of illustrations. xvii . merchant's mark, c.e.g., from a seal or stamp. (barclay's “monograms.") . mangling apparatus, with decorative inscriptions. carved in wood. icelandic. . ornamental lettering, painted on a picture frame by victor vasnetzoff. russian. (“the studio.") . slavonic inscription of the th century. . back of mirror frame, carved in low relief and enriched with gold and colour. inscription, o thou satisfier of wants, persian. th or th century. (india museum.) . the word allah, in letters designed to form an ornamental device. (l. f. d.) . the word prophet, in cursive ornamental letters. (l.f. d.) . the word allah, in fret-like letters, after the manner of a chinese seal. compare also with cufic'lettering. (l. f. d.) . the word prophet, in strap-like letters elaborately inter- laced. (l. f. d.) . stamp of domitian, with raised letters aomitianot. iron. byzantine. (b. m.) . bronze pendant, enamelled in black and white. spanish. th century. . details from the doors at le puy (comp. ), showing the point to which the conjoining of letters was carried in the th century. . part of an inscription, with conjoint gothic lettering, from a mural brass at termonde. flemish. . (from a rubbing by w. h. james weale, in the library at v. & a. m.) . conjoint letters of various periods. . diagram. l.o. xviii descriptive list of illustrations. . conjoint lettering, forming the central device, in gold with black (niello) outline, upon some silver dishes found at rome. th or th century of our era. (b. m.) . monogram, e, m.s., falling short of being a cypher only because of its continuous line (comp. , , , ). (barclay.) . sundry monograms--the component letters are written at the side of each. (l. f. d.) . solidus ( grain weight), with monogram inlaid in white metal (silver or lead). roman. (b. m.) . the alphabet in monograms of three letters. (l. f. d.) . continuous monogram, f.l. reversible, i.e., reads the same upside down (comp. , , ), by j. bonella. (barclay.) .) continuous monograms, s.p. l. and g.p.l. (comp. , , .) ), by w. h. rogers. (barclay.) . continuous monogram, r.e.d. (comp. , , , ). (l, f. d.) . monograms from jewellery designs by holbein. (print- .) room, b. m.) . diagram, indicating the variety of letter-shapes available for the monogrammist. . monograms and cypher—t. h. e. .) . / monograms—t. h. e. (l. f. d.) .) . stencilled monogram, with frame. (l. f. d.) . stencilled monogram, with symbolic background. (l. f. d.) . stencilled monogram, w.t. (l. f. d.) . monogram from a coin of queen elizabeth. descriptive list of illustrations. xix . reversed cypher panel of a carved walnut coffer. french. . (v. & a. m.) . monograms and cyphers, painted upon quarries of old glass. english. (v. & a. m.) .) iron key bows, with reversed cyphers. th or th .) century. (b. m.) . reversed cypher, from a wrought-iron fanlight. french. th century. . painted tiles, with reversed cypher, ci. french. period of henri deux. iii. bookbinding, tooled with the reversed cypher of julie d'angennes, duchesse de montausier. one of several of the same design by le gascon. french. . (“ les femmes bibliophiles.” quentin-beauchart.) . carved and fretted cyphers-l.e.w. .s—d. a. y. . t.g., . p. g., j by j. fowler. (barclay.) . g r s., by f. montague. (soane.) . b.e., by w. h. rogers. (barclay.) . w s., by f. montague. (soane.) . gothic cyphers, a.m., .h.s., (from old embroidery) a.n. (l. f. d.) . foliated cypher, . h.c. (adapted from h. rogers.) . cypher, a.m. cutwork. (l. f. d.) . cyphers, t. h. e. (l. f. d.) . cypher and masonic device. (harry soane.) . manuscript. italian. . . stamp for printing on linen.—metal tape driven into a block of deal, roughly sawn across the grain. xx descriptive list of illustrations. . initials. woodcut. german. . initial, engraved on copper. . portion of a mural brass at hal in belgium. from a rubbing by w. h. j. weale. (v. & a. m.) . portion of a flemish mural tablet in the church of s. james, tournay. . from a rubbing by w. h. j. weale. (v. & a. m.) . bronze memorial tablet. nuremberg. . (“ die bronce-epitaphien der friedhöfe zu nürnberg." gerlach & schenk.) . icelandic matchbox, carved in wood. . the words audeo, spero. plaques of fretted ivory, applied to a portuguese cabinet. (cluny museum.) . the name de-boen, chased in leather. from an italian comb case. th century. (v. & a. m.). . iron lock, with chiselled inscription, o. maria [f] los [virginum ave regina selorum . mater regina angelorum , ave maria gracia (plena, do]mi[n]us tecum bene(dicta]. french. th century. (v. & a. m.) . stencil plate. the extended limbs of the letters designed to strengthen it. (l. f. d.) . varieties of the letter a, from early printed books. . mary_the letters breaking out into scrollery, which forms a background to them, and holds the design together. . f, from a grotesque woodcut alphabet. . (in the library at the b. m.) . a. woodcarving. french. th century. (v. & a. m.) . prayer book of mary tudor, queen of england. crimson velvet, with silver gilt mounts spelling the word regina. th century. (preserved at stonyhurst college.) descriptive list of illustrations. xxi . frivolity in lettering. . woodcut initials florid gothic. by israel van meckenen. . . illuminated initial, from a choir book in the sala pico- lomini, adjoining the cathedral at siena. th century. . woodcut initials, by rob. stephanus. paris. . . |woodcut initials. french. .) . early woodcut initials. italian. . early woodcut initials. german. . early woodcut initials. french. . early woodcut initials, by g. tory. french. . .) early woodcut initials. italian, . . learly woodcut initials. french. .) . early woodcut initials. . early woodcut initials, by lucas cranach. bâle. . early woodcut initials. . early woodcut initials. german. . early woodcut initials. . woodcut initials, attributed to holbein. german. . . woodcut initials. holbein. .) . learly woodcut initials. german. . xxii descriptive list of illustrations. . early woodcut initials. . s., in glazed earthenware. designed by godfrey sykes. (v. & a. m.) . alphabet. designed by godfrey sykes. (v. & a. m.) . woodcut initials, by matthias gereon. . . early woodcut initial. (same series as .) bâle. . woodcarving, by françois siebecq, from the bedchamber of henri ii. in the louvre. . wooden ceiling in the salle de diane, château de fon- tainebleau. - . paving tiles, from harpesden church, oxon. early th century. (b. m.) " . gothic pew-ends, from a church in somersetshire. . s . earthenware dish, painted in blue and lustre on a white ground. spanish. th or th century. (v. & a. m.) . cloth, embroidered with the collar of the saint esprit, and devices from it. (cluny museum.) . glazed tile, from the ancient château de beauty. (havard's “ dictionnaire de l'ameublement.") (from stalls, carved in pinewood, in the church of s. . valentine, kiedrich. german. . (“monumental . | schriften." gerlach & schenk.) . monogrammic device, a n and cross, in couched gold thread, by beatrice waldram. . cypher decoration, painted in red and green on a whitish ground, from the roof of sall church, norfolk. . monogram, the background inlaid in flint upon a pier in wymondham church, norfolk. muistmaria ( ) silrlalo mommons will . iron purse mount. . introductory. . lettering has, over and above its practical use, and apart from any ornamental treatment of its forms, a decorative value of its own; and until recent times craftsmen of all kinds turned it habitually to account in their designs. more than that, lettering is (or was, so long as any care for it existed) in itself ornamental. a page consistently set up in good type-of one character throughout, after the manner of days when there was life in lettering, and not “displayed” after the distract- ing fashion of the modern printer—a merely well planned page is in its degree a thing of beauty. to that end, of course, the letters must be well shaped and well spaced; but, given the artist equal to the not very tremendous task of shaping them, or it may be of choosing them only and putting them together, mere type is in itself something upon which the eye can rest with l.o. КЪleb% ВКРЖКА . russian manuscript. satisfaction. to handle a printed book of the days when the printer cared for his art is a pleasure second only to that of turning over the pages of a fine manuscript. and this is no mere prejudice of the biblio- maniac, who, indeed, values books for reasons not intimately connected with the love of beauty. decorative artists have in all times felt the charm of lettering, and owned it in their work; they have gone even to the length of inventing mock writing, when they had nothing to say by it except how thoroughly they appreciated the use of any- thing like an inscription in design. artists as remote from decorative tendencies in their own work as the painter of “ the angelus ” have been deeply interested in letter- ing. it is told of j. f. millet * that as a boy he used to write verses of the bible on the wooden gates in the fields, choosing his text to fit the bars. each letter, he held, had an intrinsic decorative value of its own; and its form meant something to him. he would describe to his son, in teaching him, how the top of the big g stooped over as if to drink out of the little goblet below; and he had a liking for the combination of * h. naegely. “ j. f. millet and rustic art.” letters in certain words, even in foreign words which he did not understand. weymouth, for example, struck him as a fine combination of letters to express a poor thin-sounding word. another artist who would have repudiated any ၁၁၀၀၀၀ အိပပသ ၁၄ ယဒိသံသဏ္ဍက သသံအဆကတ္တီ၌ သဒ္ဓန္တ ပထ၀၁ထိသိ . pali buddhist manuscript. particular leaning towards the ornamental side of art, and who yet saw decorative value in lettering, was robert louis stevenson, who, a year before his death, was bent on decorating the ruddy wooden walls of his house at samoa with letter- ing. his idea was, to have made for him some r . icelandic inscription. hundreds of gilt letters on the model of “really exquisitely fine clear type from some roman monument” mounted on spikes like drawing-pins. “you see,” he wrote to mr. st. gaudens, “ suppose you entertain an honoured guest, when he goes he leaves his name in gilt letters on your walls; an infinity of fun and decoration can be got out of hospitable and festive mottoes; and the doors of every room can be beautified by the legend of their names. i really think there is something in the idea.” it was with reluctance he abandoned it. “i had a strong conviction," he wrote later, “ in that i was a great hand at writing inscriptions, and meant to exhibit and test my genius on the walls of my house; and now i see i can't. it is generally thus. the battle of the golden letters will never be delivered. on making preparation to open the campaign, the king found himself face to face with invincible difficulties, in which the rapacity of a mercenary soldiery and the complaints of an impoverished treasury played an equal part." it is no mere fancy, then, of the book-lover or of the decorator, that lettering is worthy of its place | ] lt جا کر اول | | | | | | !! اي، اكر ا ل ا و ا او کالالالم ... ك ل ام الله امام الم او د مالوم اور ان کی اور اهوا کا کام کا امک والی ریاست motsaila . arabic inscription. in ornament. lines of well formed lettering, whether on the page of a book or on the panel of a wall, break its surface pleasantly. it has only to be proportioned and set out with judgment to decorate the one or the other-modestly it is true, but the best of decoration is modest; and it is not the least of the ornamental qualities belonging to lettering that it does not clamour for attention, but will occupy a given space without asserting itself. it gives at first sight not much more than texture or variety of surface; yet, when you come to look closely at it, it tells you what could in no other way be so clearly conveyed. symbols may be misinterpreted, pictures may not convey all that is meant, the written or the graven word tells what they cannot : there is no mistaking it. at the same time, penned, painted, carved, or anywise adequately rendered, it is in itself decorative. this seems to apply to the script of no matter what race; egyptian hieroglyphic, assyrian cuneiform imprint, greek or roman chiselling, gothic penmanship, are all alike pleasant to see, quite apart from the meaning of the words, which may, as likely as not, be past our understand- ing. so too the writing of strange peoples every- where, the hebrew character, the slavonic ( ), the pali of the buddhists ( ), the runic of the icelanders ( ), the cufic and the neshki of the arabs ( ), and all manner of to us mystifying script, conveying to the unlearned absolutely rap using pastores is iniciovosisgan dy image . byzantine ivory carving. slovis. tasinant) . gothic furniture. nothing of the meaning of the words, tell us one and all of the decorative value of mere lettering. there is perhaps no more absolutely satisfactory simple way of breaking a surface than by means of well formed, well spaced lettering. in combination with ornament it has from the first been used by the decorator, and always with effect. on painted mummy cases from egypt, in carved reliefs from nineveh, and ivories from byzantium ( ), on coins from greece and syracuse, on persian tiles and lustred pottery, on gothic glass ( ) and tapestry, on church embroidery ( ) and furni- ture ( ), on leather bindings, in locksmith's and goldsmith's work ( and ) and all manner of craftsmanship, in the decoration of the manu- scripts and books of all times ( ), and on the seals and signet rings of all peoples, lettering in some form, often a very emphatic one, plays a decorative part. in modern days we seem to have lost sight of its artistic possibilities. only here and there an artist appears to perceive the opportunities it offers. william morris himself did not, except in his printed books, turn it to appreciable account ; though once at least sir e. burne-jones in his panel of perseus and the graeæ ( ) bound his gerechner un an ning we are binet ii sobre ol vuoso agnes về vai perseller i' l l s olltetelli | phim d coñoludra erece bono eu set stev a pelle . olinn eeseen vtt vedtub . stained glass tracery light. composition together by a broad overhanging belt of beautiful lettering across the vacant background io of the panel—very much as the medallist of the renaissance before him clouded as it were the sky of his medallion ( ) with inscription. the use, however, of lettering in ornament does fortitvdon est. michi in salvtea halus opvs pisani-picto . renaissance bronze medal. not depend upon its association with picture. it is itself the graphic art. it takes the place of picture, and conveys in the surest way what might possibly have been conveyed by carved groups or painted ii figure subjects, but not so precisely; and all this without calling attention to itself. there are abundant occasions when decoration ought not to attract too much notice, apart from those other eese to linine pint rando \!\ avanc htncanto se de camora - denon or paint.vn weft gennercint-vroentqve sororesi chxevsenalas caeso qve erepta dracone hadrovastoonesian sarea corpora painen f\ vrgo-orrendal inspec . vrata vedvsami . perseus and the graeÆ, by sir e. burne. jones. occasions when adequate figure design is out of the question. it must be remembered (though it may sometimes suit us to forget it) that the moderate degree of artistic accomplishment which contents us in old work will not do for us in the produc- tions of our own day. we have passed the period www ii. part of an embroidered stole. by it in their design, and perhaps led into a form of expression which conveys their meaning only to the smallest circle of admirers. the possi- bilities of symbolism stop suddenly short. the designer is faced by two alternatives. either the symbols at his service are familiar, so familiar as to be hackneyed and commonplace, or, if they are of his own imagining, the interpretation of them alexander.diogenes www winni uld aeschi . initials from early printed books. makes demands upon our sympathetic recognition to which only here and there an appreciative soul respcnds. it has continually been found necessary to explain the significance of symbols, and even to call in for that purpose the aid of lettering, which of itself would have sufficed without them. it is not as though symbols were of themselves invariably ornamental. the sign which best conveys the meaning of the artist may not, and in practice often does not, readily conform to the conditions of design, and its forcible introduction into the scheme of decoration has consequently always an air of intrusion. lettering, on the other hand, is by nature most iz bas wohet . champleve enamel. henri deux. amenable to treatment; there are so many varieties of lettering, so many ways of introducing it; and, given the artist accustomed to its manipulation, it can so readily be made to take its place in such a way as certainly not to mar the decorative effect, and most likely to enhance it. a picture itself, or a piece of sculpture, con- ceived in the spirit of decoration, may gain no less in decorative value than in significance by the introduction into it of lettering in one form or emres to xmm as omn:omnarma oliv die iakom altcui:udbantu . gothic encaustic tile. another. this lettering may fill, or just suffi- ciently occupy, a panel or a tablet; it may be introduced into the nimbus of a saint or on a label encompassing him ; it may be as it were embroidered on the hem of his garmentor written across the folds of it, as was done in mediæval times—whilst the assyrian of old boldly cut his cuneiform inscriptions right across his pic- tures in relief; it may be-diaper the ground ( ), or otherwise enter into its decoration ( ); the devices of the designer are more than it is here possible to number. in certain initials from early printed books ( ) lettering at once decorative and explanatory is introduced into the subsidiary decoration of the capital letters. ornament, apart from picture, may gain still more from lettering, which takes, in turn, the place of figured story. it may form itself the staple of all decorative device, as in many an instance here given ; it may be cunningly inter- woven with ornament ( ) ; it may be plentifully employed ( ) or sparingly ( ); it is equally ready to fill the most conspicuous place or to retire discreetly into obscurity; it is the most obedient servant of the ornamentist. . jewellery, by h. holbein. .. . ii. the printed page. the idea of lettering is so closely bound up with that of printed type that the book, from title page to printer's mark, naturally comes into consideration. due consideration of it from the printer's point of view would, however, lead us astray from the present purpose; it would demand quite a volume to itself. the very extent of the subject compels its compression within strict limits. it will be impossible here to do more than consider the page, printed or written, as a comparatively com- pact mass of lettering, the main business of which is to tell us something, but to tell it with decent regard for appearances : it would not otherwise come within our scope at all. the assumption that the appearance of the page is to be improved only at the cost of legibility, may have some grounds in the vagaries of artists wanting in respect for the art in which they dabble, but it is not founded upon any inherent incompatibility between what is beautiful and what can easily be read. lettering may very well answer both con- ditions, and should do so. is our newspaper type more legible than a fine roman inscription ? any advantage print may have lies entirely in the fact that the man in the street is more familiar with it. modern improvements (?) in type have unfortunately been in the one direction of plain printing, leaving aside the question of beauty, with the result that the immediate effect of any artistic improvement in letter-shapes must be a degree of strangeness which, however slight, will strike people as less readable—not that it is really so. only in so far is it true, that more beautiful lettering means lettering more difficult to read. many a beautiful script which asks of us rather more attention than modern type, would be at least as plain to us if it were our ordinary reading. there is not the slightest doubt that twentieth century type might well be made more beautiful than it is. the obstacles in the way of doing it are, not that such type would be less readable, but that “ practical” people have made up their minds that it would be, and vast commercial interests are engaged on the side of letting things be. the best we can hope for is gradual improvement, and that such slight changes as occur in the fashions of print may be for the better. it is well that artistic attention should be called to it, for some- thing of all artistic doing trickles through into trade. the effort of william morris has not been without effect. printers who would most emphati- cally deny that they are converted to his opinions have plainly been influenced by his work. c in the case of the written page, as of the graven slab, the painted tablet, and other hand lettering, (to all of which much that is here said equally applies) the artist is untrammelled except by public prejudice, which, if he deserves the name, he will to some extent ignore. it is the bounden duty of the caligrapher to obey the principle of beauty, to shape his letters as perfectly, and to space them as pleasantly, as conditions will allow. the conditions of execution with pen, brush, graver or other tool will affect in most cases the shape of the letters. with regard to their distri- bution and arrangement, the conditions apply equally to page, panel, tablet, or any solid block of writing such as the rectangular patch of com- pact inscription adopted by greek or roman carvers when they did not frame it in mouldings or design a tablet for its reception. let us take the printed page as typical of the area on which a patch of lettering is to be spread. experience proves that the eye is best satisfied by a tolerably uniform distribution of the letters, roman, gothic, or whatever their character, over it, so that they give at first sight the impression of a fairly even surface, distinguished from the surrounding surface (that is, the margin) more by a difference of tint than by any appreciable letter- forms within the mass. the tint of print is, however, only relatively even : words are of uneven length; and there may be other breaks in its continuity, occurring as the sense of the words determines, and just not as the compositor would have them. nevertheless he is bound to accept them, not merely to take them into account, but to make the best of them, un- happily as they may come for him. he cannot, without forfeiting all claim to artistic feeling, shirk the difficulty of so scheming his lines that they are of equal length, that the words are as little broken as possible and never awkwardly, and that the spaces between them do not run into little rivulets of white wandering irregularly down the page, to its extreme disfigurement. broad spaces of white between the lines of print inter- cept such ugly streams, at the same time that they make reading easier; but the comparatively even tint given by closely compact lines of type is more restful to the eye than distinctly marked bars of print. here is, for once, a point of divergence between the most useful and the most beautiful way of doing it. it applies, however, more to printed books than to carved, graven or written inscription. in books, where easy reading counts for much and symmetry for little, it would be absurd to sacrifice convenience to effect, and to abandon any division or distribution of the text upon the page enabling us to grasp the meaning readily. we want our reading made easy: and there is not the least doubt that breaks in the type which correspond to breaks in the sense do make it easier. the division of the text into words, sentences, paragraphs, and chapters, is a foregone conclusion, with which it is futile to quarrel. the remedy for the undue preponderance of white, where a paragraph breaks the uniformity of the printed page, is, not to do away with para- graphs, but to break up the page into a number of them. that also makes it livelier and easier to read; and if to some extent it takes away from the importance attaching to a less frequent pause, the balance of emphasis can be restored by a dis- tinctive form of letter at the beginning of the dominant paragraph, denoting a fresh start- which of itself may be made to add to the interest and beauty of the page. but the consideration of the initial letter belongs to another chapter. an alternative to leaving a blank space at the end of a sentence, is to mark the pause by a printed sign, much heavier than the type of course (or it would not equally arrest the attention) and there- fore no less objectionable than the plain paper : the recurrence of relatively solid black ornaments amidst the grey tint given by the type, is even more irritating than gaps of white in it. the sign, of something like equal weight with the text, by which the greek scribe, say of the eighth century, marks a pause in the sense, is proportionately happier in effect, but does not meet the modern need for a signal which there can be no mistaking even from a long way off. in fact, the demand for something more like “stops " is as old as the tenth century. the proportion of the patch of print to the page of the book, the amount, that is to say, of margin leſt round the text, and the position of the patch upon the page, have very much to do with its . printers' marks. appearance, and are very serious considerations with the artist. it has been attempted to define precisely how to place the print upon the page ; but it is one thing to say this or that system answers well, and another to insist that only upon one system are good results to be got. the pro- portion of print to plain paper is just one of those points upon which an artist follows his instinct, and is not to be bound by rule : he works out rules for himself. the double column owes its origin presumably to practical convenience. when the page was broad, and the type employed was not very large, the lines of print ran to such a length of words that it was not easy to carry back the eye and take up the next line with certainty. the obvious remedy for this was to have two shorter lines of print, with a sufficiently broad interval between them to divide the print into clearly marked columns. and the effect of this in early printed books was most satisfactory. in modern printing, where the space between the columns is reduced to a minimum (when will some really practical news- paper printer give us once more columns sufficiently wide apart ?), the effect is not merely unpleasing but perplexing, the eye being continually caught by something in the adjoining column and led astray. except, however, in very wide pages, excusable mainly on the grounds that they may be necessary to adequate illustration, the double column is no longer wanted, and is in fact so nearly obsolete that, where it survives, it has a distinctly old-fashioned look. itis, nevertheless, no less effective than it is logical, to consider the two pages of the open book as one area on which to plant, as it were, two columns of print. a very considerable reduction of the inner margins, as compared with the outer and the upper and lower, has this effect; and it is perhaps the most satisfactory way of composing the page an illustrated news paper and weekly review . rough sketch-design for newspaper heading. -if only the binder were to be depended upon. unless the folding of the sheets is perfect, the two patches of print do not range, and the closer they come together the more obtrusive is the fault : it is not so easily detected when there is a broad space of white between. the ornamentation of the page, beyond the mere setting out of type upon it, is a subject apart. the only opportunity of the compositor for anything like free and fanciful composition is in the title page, where, again, he does wisely in curbing his fancy. plain print in the body of the book seems to demand corresponding severity in the treatment of the title page, in any case the most difficult page in the book to set out. our type is a carrying on of the character which came originally from the use of the pen. it will always probably, perhaps it always should, bear traces of its origin : we do not want to wipe out the landmarks of its history. but there seems no reason why this carrying on should not be also a carrying further, and in the direction, not of writing, but of printing, and even of type-founding. why should not type bear on its face the evidence of that also ? as in the title page of a book, so in a newspaper heading ( ), or the cover of a magazine, there is possible scope for design, more especially as they are not ordinarily printed from type, but from a block. unfortunately, however, the publisher's idea of lettering is usually type, to which he would have the artist conform most strictly. the demand of trade is, further, for something which shall advertise itself on the railway bookstalls, which shall be unmistakably readable as the flurried passenger hurries past to catch his train, and at the same time fresh and unexpected. the dictates of art, on the other hand, suggest some- thing which shall not shout itself hoarse. it is difficult under such conditions to do more than design bold, þroad and effective lettering, and to go as far towards mitigating its obtrusive- ness as the publisher will permit; but one cannot help doubting whether the clever people whose business it is to gauge the public taste do not over-estimate its vulgarity. advertisement, into which lettering enters, and must always enter, largely, affords but little scope for art—it is a game of brag; but publishers and others who have an interest in announcing not merely what they have to sell, but the beauty and refinement of the things, might well trust some- thing to the efficacy of tasteful announcement. where, by chance, the responsibility for an ad- vertisement sheet is in the hands of people not so much concerned about trade as about art, and they entrust its design to a competent artist, as in the case of mr. anning bell's announcement of the liverpool school of art, the result, though by no means legible at a glance, is something which, by its very distinction from the common run of flaring posters, attracts attention and holds it. for the rest, the only chance of the decorative artist in the direction of advertisement rests with the poster-humorist, who has found his oppor- tunity, and makes good use of it—if not of lettering always. to return, however, to the wider subject of the printed page, all that is here claimed on behalf of art is, due regard to its appearance. in the printing of books the ruling consideration is not beauty, but the sense of the author's words. the only question open to serious dispute is, how best, to make that clear and easy reading, with least violence, if any, to the sense of proportion and beauty. w mindreres mexxxxxxxx . . ovorio : ssssssssss herren hd dischachete orld . alfonso the wise, his mark. a.d. . iii. the written page. the written page is naturally set out very much on the lines of print-itself, of course, originally modelled upon manuscript. in so far as type and manuscript seek the same end, they are subject to the same laws; but only to that extent; and the aim of the two is not identical. the scribe of old was not so bent upon rapid writing that he had no time to consider its form, nor so intent upon ready reading that he dared not make the slightest demand upon the attention of the reader. you may see that in don alfonso his mark ( ). and to-day also when a page is penned it is not with a view to conveying the author's mean- ing in the plainest and most unmistakable way. the craft of the scribe (as distinguished from the fluent correspondent) is not so utilitarian as that of the printer. the writer is free to indulge in luxuries of art which the printer cannot afford, at times even to sacrifice something of plain speech to what might be called rhetoric; he has, by right of his pen, a faculty of taking liberties with the set form and mechanical order of letters, which the man of print has not, a power which insensibility only would neglect to exercise. when, as in the present day, caligraphy is employed no longer in writing books upon parchment but in penning the text to accompany some form of illustration (eventually to be incor- porated in the printer's process-block), the free exercise of his power is the very occasion and excuse of the artist for venturing into penmanship. he is in a sort compelled to make the venture; for the decoration of the page implies the sympathetic rendering of accompanying text. the art of lettering is one which the decorative artist cannot afford to neglect; not necessarily ornamental script, but plain, simple lettering- something which, when he is decorating a book, he may use in his designs, or with his designs, in place of type. type is only too ready to his hand; but caritas gott gesang ivli . qvarz facvltÆt entvorf. palmette bvkovina dago bert fvx schrift psyche . inscription by joseph plecnik, vienna. when it comes to finding a fount which will go well with pen or brush drawing, the choice is well nigh hopeless. nothing seems to be quite right. if he wants something which shall not jar with his work, he must do it himself; and to do it satisfactorily he must be master of at least one form of lettering. it is true that many an artist who has felt the incongruity of type, and therefore penned his own page, hasonly escaped from one trouble into another. “i hope,” writes a distinguished author, apropos of the publication of his own poems, “it isn't necessary to put the verse into that rustic print- ing. i am philistine enough to prefer clean printer's type; indeed, i can form no idea of the verses thus transcribed by the incult and totter- ing hand of the draughtsman, nor gather any impression beyond one of weariness to the eyes.” who does not sympathise with this protest against the bad work of perhaps a good artist ? a man may be an excellent draughtsman, and yet in the direction of caligraphy no more expert than a child. but the choice is not between the bad writing of the artist and the hard and fast type of the founder--of which two evils type may be the lesser; there are at least two other alternatives— that the artist should learn to write, or that he should get a sympathetic scribe to write for him. caligraphy is a term we use in speaking of the ancient or mediæval scribe, because he it was who wrote beautifully. the scribe who cultivates the art of writing is to-day rare, but the species is happily not extinct; and there is, at all events in some quarters, a rather general desire to master script, consequent upon the realisation of its use in design. an artist may have no desire to deviate into ornament, and yet appreciate the advantages of penning his own lettering, or seeing it written under his own eye. it gives him, even if he accepts the alphabet as it is, in all its severe simplicity, the opportunity, not only of shaping it to suit himself, but of placing the letters where and as he likes; and, if he should want an even effect, of spacing them more perfectly than print allows. he can put letters just as close together or just as far apart as may seem fit to him, can spread, contract, persuade them even, by some slightest modification of the letter-shapes, to accommodate themselves one to another as ready-cast type can- not possibly do. he can give to capitals their relative importance, and emphasise his words in other ways than by the use of italics. in short, he can have his own way instead of going the way bayern:zaubertrank schutzeruppe:qvelle zeus:psychetauwerr wald:natade:rubens: paradis:xenophanes drudenfuss:qvark . inscription by otto hupp, munich. of the machine-only he must have command of his implement, pen or brush or whatever it be: his writing must be adequate. the writer does wrong to form himself, as he often does, upon printed type (his obvious model is manuscript, upon which that itself is formed), and especially wrong to emulate the regularity of print. he can get with the pen or brush qualities of more account than mechanical precision (in aiming at which he is at a disadvantage as compared with the machine), qualities beyond the scope of printing, and of a kind which differentiate his work from it. it may be as well to exemplify the sort of even- ness of distribution to be obtained in penmanship and not in printing. the writer has only to pro- long a stroke to occupy the gap of white which occurs between two such letters as rt, or ev. l. . or the gap may be avoided by the choice of a different type of letter; it will be seen (diagram ) how the choice of the straddling m fills up the space left at the foot of the letter f, and how it widens the breach after the letter a. writers of old never seem to have been bound hard and fast to one type of letter. even in the same phrase various forms of the same letter occur, as if it happened so, much to the enlivenment of the page. and such variation shows regard (con- scious or unconscious) to the way the various shapes compose. the playful variety of old lettering is one of the charms we find in it. how pleasant the surprise of the rectangular c occurring once only in the word ecce, as we find it on the doors at le puy (diagram ). one has less sympathy nowadays with the turning about of a letter to make it fit a space. that was all very well when writers were not particular as to whether the bar of the n slanted this way or that. we are no longer at liberty to make a p or s face back- wards; it is a device belonging to a stage of letter- ing more elementary than the one we have reached. the same objection does not apply to the liberty taken on occasion with the size of individual letters; but there should be occasion for it. it should be done with deliberate purpose—for the sake of compression, composition, emphasis, not out of mere wilfulness. it is reasonable enough to reduce the size of a letter in order to bring it into the desired compass, to make it, for example, occupy the blank space which always follows the letter l-observe the compactness of the letters lod and the want of it in loi (diagram )—but to reduce an unfor- tunate vowel always to proportions at which it looks more like a stop than a letter, does not seem to justify itself on any ground of taste or expe- fm fm dⓇ amam ecce lodloi mary . diagram. diency, except that it enables the writer to shirk the difficulty of penning a bold round –a paltry excuse for pretended artistry. one is apt to resent mere wilfulness on the part of the scribe—variations, that is to say, not suggested by conditions of the case. we accept them readily when there is reason for them, and all the more readily when the writer consistently carries through the idea of compression, or whatever his motive may be. old writers often saved space by enclosing one letter within another, as in the combinations di, on, vs (diagram ). d once in a while we are able to express by the proportions of a letter something not otherwise easily to be conveyed-as, for example, by reducing the size of a letter in the word mary to indicate a pet name in which the r is familiarly dropped. auseful rule of writing has been laid down by herr v. larisch, from whose “ beispiele künstlerischer schrift ” two very different instances are given ( and ), to the effect that the letters of a word should be so contrived that the ground-space between them is always equal (not the distance between their extremities); but that is possible only on condition of taking occasional liberties of the kind already mentioned. the viennese artist, it will be seen ( ), adopts the old german device of writing the double t in gott as one letter, and the bavarian ( ) dwarfs a z when his composition requires it. when it comes to the modification of the letter- shape, in what is ostensibly plain lettering, the penman is on rather dangerous ground; but he may safely lengthen the limbs of letters, or other- wise extend or compress them, so long as no im- pression is conveyed of torturing them, or of trifling with a script which has serious business to do. the impression of affectation is easily produced by undue liberties with the proportion of letters. the bar of the a or of the h is not once and for all fixed; it may be shifted a trifle higher or lower without hurt; but the fashion, not merely of high- waisted letters, but of waists gradually rising almost to their necks, becomes absurd. it is one thing to depart from orthodoxy, another to go beyond the bounds of all moderation. it is only in modera- tion that freedom of hand is here claimed, and only on this ground: that the proportion of the s d . diagram to show construction of letters. letter itself is of less moment than the aspect of the word, the line, the page, in favour of which the letteſ must be sacrificed. the variety which is the charm of handwork comes naturally to the writer who is ready with his pen or brush; and, if for its sake only, it is incumbent upon the decorator, and especially upon the ornamentist, to master the art of lettering. he need not be adept in lettering of all kinds, but at least he should take some one character, roman, gothic, or whatever may best suit his style of work (of course, a fine type of letter, not common newspaper print), and master that, make it his, get as expert in it as in writing a running hand. let him acquire, in short, a hand of his own; it need be no more like print than his epistolary hand is like a writing master's; it should be in every sense his own handwriting. elaborate diagrams ( ) have been devised to show the geometric plan on which letters are sup- posed to be built. these are of some use in helping to explain the exact proportion of their parts; but a draughtsman should be able to draw without all that amount of compass-work. the construction of the alphabet appears to have been first worked out in the fifteenth century by an italian, one felice feliciano; after him followed fra luca paccioli ; but the best known diagrams are those of dürer, who in his book on proportion ( ) gave twenty- two pages to them, and yet the types of letter he adopted are by no means unimpeachable. the fact is, all this mathematical jugglery is beside the question of art, and especially of design. it is not so that letters are designed, nor anything else. the artist must learn to write-painfully if he should have no turn that way; but when it comes to lettering, he must do it straight off ; that is necessary to spontaneity, without which it will never be anything but cramped. there are occasions when exceptional care is necessary, and warencia tpecimensi laminit intima pir of:mediÆval architecture ochiefly selected to from:examples sof:the: ano: : centuries:in:| france:x:italy ano:orawn:by| w:eoen:nesfielo architect:lonoon be piper suvaww published:by.dayano:sonat date:street:near lincoln's inn: fielos januaryao: m . title page by w. eden nesfield. a high degree of finish and exactness; but there is no middle course between direct penmanship or brushwork and most carefully drawn lettering. there is not much to be done in the way of touch- ing-up letters which have been freely put in. it must be one thing or the other. spontaneity, it should be explained, does not imply rashness in setting out writing, or careless- ness in penning it. the lines should be straight, of equal length, and at equal distances. the soul of the scribe must not be beyond measurement or calculation. it is not till he has taken the neces- sary precautions, mechanical and other, that he can safely go ahead and write freely. is unmistakably very much what he would have designed for a brass. there is a dignified austerity about it not usually to be found either in the printing or the penmanship of his day. of such importance may be the dignity of letter design, that some facility in reading is readily to be sacrificed to it. it is not imperative that an minsgleits blos okvartesgrossa okwondinsdless osivtes scrwetsa xdiesesbitterbeit Ögociisbruirzikit . back of carved pine ch. stall, . inscription should be read as you run; enough if it is apparent that there is an inscription which, if you care to pause and study it, you may read. accordingly, the rules which apply to print or inanuscript may in monumental inscription be re- laxed. it is no longer necessary to keep the lines of lettering wide apart so as to form horizontal bars of text; they may follow closely one upon the other, and the words themselves may be closed up to form a compact mass. in place of orthodox punctuation, and of the ordinary division into sentences, the artist may mark the pauses in his own way. should it be by the interpolation of flowers, badges, or other ornaments, these may now be, and usually will be, of equal weight with the lettering, it being no longer so necessary to make reading easy as to present a dignified inscription. the utmost the reader has a right to ask of him is that there shall be no possible mistake about it when he comes to study it. architectural dignity is best preserved by the adoption of the simplest and severest character, and by distributing the lettering in the evenest and most formal way. the style of it must depend upon that of the architecture; but straight-lined charac- ters, roman or gothic ( , ), seem always to take their place in a building more as if they belonged to it than any florid writing; and this is especially the case with carving in stone or engraving in metal ; anything in the nature of a flourish is more appropriate to the pen or brush. there is no possible rule, however; an artist is guided by his feeling in such matters, and if he has taste it will guide him aright. the beautiful panel of lettering, well deserving its place of honour in the tomb of mary of burgundy, at bruges ( ), shows that it only needs the competent artist, and he can, with- out offence, give play to his fancy even in serious monumental design. it will be seen that he reserves in this instance the more fantastic flourish- ing of the letters for the base of the panel, where their work is over and they may safely be playful. francis ptolemaevs aeditvvs hocpvlpitvm instavravit exornavit etavxit an:d md xliii . raised letters in marble. inscriptions are written by common consent in horizontal lines. it is not so universally conceded that the lines should be of equal length, and form therefore a compact rectangular mass of lettering. this may not be possible in the case of an ample inscription within, let us say, a wreath, which was at one time common enough ( ). the lettering must often in that case perforce follow the lines enclosing it. but similar or other fanciful distribution of the words occurs also where there is no such reason for it, where no framing lines constrain the writer. in that case he loses something of the dignity and decorative value of inscription by straying from the straight line : there is virtue in its verticality. even should there be some reason against a simple four-sided patch of lettering, the lines may with advantage be grouped so as to give at least a rectangular figure. an edge meandering in and out unmeaningly, or following a florid framing line, is a thing to avoid. and if the frame compels it, the fault was in designing a frame so ill-adapted to its purpose. the rectangular space is invariably satisfactory ( ). given a frame to fill, the designer of an inscription must do his best; and a competent artist will make the best of even a very bad job; but, clearly, the better way to set about lettering in decoration is, to set out the inscription before designing a tablet or setting of any kind for it-to design, in fact, the frame for the lettering, not adapt the lettering to the frame. to the inexpert a word or two may be accept- able as to the setting out of an inscription. there may be many ways of doing it. mine is one which works out satisfactorily. it is this:-- . imagine about how you think the inscription would subdivide-say into so many lines (long or short according to your scheme of design). benoti i defede rigis el fesvlan. qvi virin egerimen vitÆsvma cvmavid vixit-anno qve lim.cccci defvna ctvs est . incised marble, luca della robbia. . write one line as it comes. . count the number of letters in the line (reckoning the space between word and word as equivalent to one letter). . reckon to how many lines your inscription + tu batteotovic nl vigogt? stonosi inside statsivering voroveim. voirotot putkistoautini? (oridomru totoo gotivi . embossed in silver-gilt, dalmatia. will run, and how this number of lines will suit your space. . if it does not accommodate itself, you may have to begin again; but each successive guess is likely to be nearer the mark than the last. . . having determined that your inscription shall be in so many lines, averaging so many letters, at such or such a distance apart, the next step is to note (upon the rough copy of the words) where the lines would end, and how the words would be broken. . you will probably find that, by a little readjustment, taking a letter or two from one line and including it in another, you can divide your inscription into lines containing each a number herlioevvnd-vorwÄsen s. jacobi, lÜbeck, . of making free with the normal letter-shapes is given above ( ). apart, of course, from the style of letter deter- mined by the architecture of a building or monu- ment, is the character which comes of its execution in stone ( ), or metal ( ), and of its standing up in relief upon a sunken ground ( ), or being cut into the surface ( ). the face of the letters may, indeed, be carved, and sometimes is, especially in wood; it may be modelled, and sometimes is, in clay; and there is no precise limit to the relief or modelling in which the artist may on occasion indulge; but it is not often that it is desirable to interfere with the flat surface of lettering ; there is a danger of frittering away the valuable surface of the material; and the forms of most letters express themselves sufficiently by their outline alone. even the so-called ribbon letters ( ), in which the turnover of the ribbon needs to be expressed, want little more than one sharp cut to express the fold. to insist upon nearer resemblance to ribbon is to indulge in a florid form of letter- ing remarkable, not for architectural dignity, but for a certain playfulness, pleasing indeed, but ill-suited to very serious and sober decoration : it l. . littluwhiteni ml) mlimuinua la fitili hithiimtindo antimit what . ribbon-like gothic is not so much lettering in ornament as ornamental lettering—which is not the subject of this chapter. there is less occasion, then, in architecture for actually modelled lettering than for letters cut into the ground or left in flat relief upon it. either expedient is in its place equally perfect. in incised lettering the surface of the slab is preserved ; but the simple “grounding out” of the letters, leaving the metal, stone, or wood intact, to form their face, is also a sure way of preserving their breadth of surface. it is quite commonly employed in brass and bronze, plain strips of metal (measuring perhaps as much as twice the thickness of the strokes of the letters) being left between the rows of writing, broken only by the tops and tails of tall letters engraved across them, and by an occasional avo umido um muis: himah tt hmi rittÄitmi auttiimi widiotihilirimit tottitt hitsiltumine dodattimum inscription from a flemish brass. initial ( ). this expedient of the band was, in fact, almost necessary for the accommodation of the projecting parts of the minuscule letters ; certainly it has invariably a good effect. the grounding-out of letters upon brass was sometimes done with a view to filling in the space with black or coloured mastic; but the sunken parts, being beyond the reach of the polisher, soon tarnish in any case, and deepen of themselves in colour, with the result that the letters tell light and bright upon it. so in the case of wood or stone, the surface of the raised letter is apt to get in time a polish which the ground does not. a sunken ground is commonly adopted in black letter inscriptions, in which the upright strokes come close together ; e and there is seldom any broad surface of ground between. in the case of roman letters, or gothic letters more or less of the roman type, there are apt to be gaps in the ground, which give rise to the occasion, if not the need, for ornament of some kind, in order to preserve the evenness of the inscription. the danger may, however, be evaded by closing the letters up and minimis- ing the space between them, especially if the inscription is in channels with plain raised bands between. a similar plan of crowding out the background may be employed with good effect by the penman or painter. by merely draw- ing his letters in outline as close together as he can and filling in the background, he gets a character in his lettering ( ) quite different from that which would result from painting light letters upon a dark band. in the case of black letter inscriptions, the engraver of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries often, as before said, made incisions in them to suggest the turn over of a strap or ribbon, playing indeed slight variations upon that simple idea with admirable effect; but he was happiest when he was content to suggest a turnover and did not want to imitate it. bastito . diagram. litsuclnralira p:oluri hir: galimsalim rtov o . sandstone slab, regensburg. the flaw in black letter inscription is the incon- gruity of the capitals used with it. they break the line perhaps happily, and relieve the monotony of an exceptionally rigid form of minuscule; but they rarely seem to belong to it ( ). the capitals above ( ) are much more in keeping . ruum.s j, rbittiar:uer, lchil turerbaruudwrijk here? i watotizdir. don sotgawig ruumo.jsza.deniz.ditob:uniſhni dipürbar undcüzmiliaftsmi y salitaniwleiti etuirthdagufgiteding . bronze from a grave at nuremberg. with the other letters than those on this page ( ); but really satisfactory capitals to go with black letter have never been, and are perhaps not to be, designed. this is a matter of less practical im- portance to us, seeing that the days of that particular character are, except for occasional purposes, already passed. there is no reason why grounding out should not more often be employed in stone or marble when the scale allows it; it is employed to ad- mirable effect in the wooden pew-end opposite ( ), and in the inscriptions upon the much earlier doors of the cathedral at le puy ( ). small lettering is more naturally cut into stone, as the cuneiform and greek and roman warden in ucc t inscriptions invariably were. in the little byzan- tine iron shield at the end of the chapter ( ) the incised lettering is filied in with silver. between sunken letters and letters in re- lief, the choice is determined partly by the jest mnieri consideration as mathew to which is the easier to do, partly by which will be the more secure from in- jury; when nei- ther would be difficult and either would be safe, it becomes a question mere- ly of effect. the lasting charac- ter of lettering . old english . pew-end. on a sunken ground, in metal, is witnessed by numberless mediæval monumental brasses, in which the decorative use of lettering is shown trium- phantly. we have only to compare these with the tombstones of a later date to see how monumental lettering may be used to artistic and to ineffective purpose. which of the two it det might be, was in the past very much a question of period: engravers of the seventeenth and eighteenth and especially the nineteenth centuries fell on evil days for design: with us it is a question of taste. we have lost hold of tradition, but we have freer choice; and out of our eclecticism, may i call it, better things should come—if we but take the pains to inform ourselves. the work of a man who knows what master workmen before him have done, must needs be better than he could spin out of his own ignorant imagining. skypieg ® boho ti . iron inlaid with silver. byzantine. . ivory carving of the tenth century. v. decorative lettering. many and various were the methods of intro- ducing inscription into decorative design. it found its way even into picture, until the time when the pictorial ideal ceased to include decora- tive effect. long inscriptions claimed for them- selves, as a rule, a place apart; shorter ones were used sometimes to frame the picture, sometimes to form part of it. in introducing lettering into decoration, people accustomed to write in horizontal lines from left to right naturally adopted that direction. they might occasionally be led by considerations of design to scheme an inscription otherwise ; but, in the main, decorative lettering takes the hori. zontal direction. such, in fact, is the decorative use of some such horizontal band as lettering gives, that one is inclined to suspect that in- scriptions have often been introduced into design quite as much for the line they gave as for the information it was desired to convey in them. about the earliest and most uncompromising use of inscription that we know of is seen in the well- known bas-reliefs from nineveh (eighth and ninth centuries b.c.), in which broad belts of cuneiform lettering deliberately cross the picture in a way which, brutal as in a sense it must be called, is not sheer brutality, so useful is it in the com- position, and so little hurt is there to broadly conventional sculpture of that kind in a treatment which, applied to more delicate workmanship, would be downright cruel. we find indeed some- thing of the same kind in quite late gothic tapestry and wall-painting, where the names of the personages represented are sometimes written straight across their drapery. the gentler treatment is to write only upon the background to the figures, where the horizontal bands or belts of lettering are of use in crossing narrow upright spaces between the figures or between the figure and its frame, and in binding the parts of the composition into one. another use to which bands of inscription are commonly put is to separate tiers of small picture panels one from the other, as, for example, in the narrow lights of tall gothic windows, which they hold together in a most satisfactory manner. a s racht beribila rrossinele ПРЕЗ tzemdvsme ja সত্যিটিতে esler ГІ ТА etknerico pasuresigarette lora divagen sie . part of a door of the cathedral at le puy. very pronounced use of bands of lettering to sepa- rate little figure subjects is made in the doors of the cathedral at le puy, of which a portion is illus- trated ( ). the lettering there is on a pro- portionately very large and important scale ; but it holds its own perfectly both with the ornamental borders and with the figure subjects. the carving is of the simplest kind, mere flat “grounding out,” but the effect is singularly rich; and certainly not the least interesting part of the design, when you examine it in detail, is the lettering. it proves to be latin hexameters, explanatory, of course, of the incidents depicted, running right across the four divisions of the doors. the upright post between the two doors (to the right of the illustration), shows another use of lettering. clearly, where all about it was so full of pattern, that called out for enrichment. why should not the carver make use of it to sign his name? and who is not grateful to master godfrey for the way he has done it? he could hardly have devised ornament more effective or more fitting. there is no need to multiply instances of pictures kept apart by interspaces of lettering. the mediæval decorator delighted in a multitude of little figure groups, and he knew no better way than this of separating them-nor do we for that matter, though nowadays we are not so fond of lettering. it is no uncommon thing to find in one and the same mediæval composition inscriptions treated o manhatycomel doctoanthly uoat h ТАТВОРНАЯ АНТӨМРО Ламет amnmuwire . silver-gilt cover to a copy of the gospels with slavonic inscriptions, . xviyn ys '\ h - 'xstoso **** * nb alte come n tar meine solcetiri n .. iveste in a variety of ways. the designer had the wit at the same time to diversify his design and to make his meaning as explicit as might be-after all, words are the most explicit form in which to convey it—and he succeeded in making them subserve an artistic purpose also ( ). there is a flemish tapestry at the victoria and albert museum representing the seven deadly sins ( – ), in which the names of jeremiah, justice, pity, etc., are written across their bodies, whilst the words of the prophet occupy a scroll. it is a rather important point in design that in a single composition different forms of inscription should be adopted only to convey different kinds of information; and that, vice versa, different kinds of information should be conveyed in dif- ferent ways. what is necessary to intelligibility may be made so, to contribute to decorative effect. of old it did not accur to the writer to intro- duce all manners of writing into his design ; he confined himself habitually to one form of letter, varying perhaps in scale, or in the manner of its rendering, but in its main lines the same through- out-for the simple reason, it may be, that no other was familiar to him. to-day we turn our know- ledge of many types to the worst possible account in mixing them together. our scraps of know- ledge lead us continually into danger. it is often desirable, and even necessary, to make some words stand forth in a design, and others to shrink back; it is the business of a designer to give such words as he may introduce their due and precise value, to make some perhaps larger than others, some more solid, to reduce certain of them to relative insignificance; but reason and art alike demand that all should be in one handwriting. natural as it is to write from left to right, and useful as cross bands of lettering are in counter- acting the upright lines in figure composition, the n sechi vicu har dir . engraving on copper by h. s. beham, . artist has always felt himself free to depart from the usual practice when that did not suit his purpose. if he had no need of any definite line, he preferred perhaps merely to break the surface of the background with quite irregular lettering. he made bold, if need were, to place the letters of the words in vertical instead of horizontal order, or to scatter them about the ground more in the form of a diaper; perhaps he preferred to write them on a tablet or a scroll ( ) designed to receive them, nadnodooil no olhospodybduesaineet . cad: vorn aradis obito edes atc . stone grave slab, gotland, . · emphasising the roundness of a vase, and some- times in correcting its proportions. quite rude instances of this occur in the mugs and other common earthen pots decorated in “slip” after a staffordshire fashion of the end of the seventeenth century ( ). more refined examples occur in old greek vases; but there the inscriptions are so deli- cate that, reduced to the scale of our illustrations, they would hardly be seen. they are, in fact, so inconspicuous that, but for the fact (pointed out to me by mr. cecil smith) that they occupy a position of honour in the scheme of greek vase painting, one might take them to be an afterthought of the designer. the lip, the neck, the shoulder of a vase may each in turn conveniently be decorated in this way, the words engraved on silver, painted on pottery, enamelled on glass. successive rings of letter- ing, with or without other ornament between, make excellent decoration, which, as the wording is never seen all at once, does not assert its meaning. the hispano-moresque potters frequently introduced bands of mock arabic inscription into their lustred earthenware, preferring, it is said, not to profane the name of the prophet by putting it upon the infidel market. they also hashed up into ornament the roman and gothic character, not perhaps know- ing the havoc they were working with its sense. the practice speaks for the value of lettering in ornament; but it does not justify mock inscrip- opicidetrite tituluce . part of a moorish door, with gothic inscription. Է tion, for which there is no honest place in decora- tion. if something like lettering is wanted where there is a reason why real words should not be used, it should be within the power of an artist to design ornament having nearly enough the value of lettering without ever making any pretence to be inscription. lettering makes a very good border-not merely in connection with ornament, though there is scope for that too in very broad borders, but by itself, as may be seen in many a grave slab ( ) and old brass, where it frames a monumental effigy or heraldic device as effectively as any pattern would do. the letters make, in fact, pattern enough, excellent and appropriate in proportion to its severity. the formality and rigidity of letters make for that steadiness which is so desirable in a border; the parallel upright strokes of gothic black-letter, of which an orientalised version is given ( ), fulfil very much the same purpose as the rectangular lines of a greek fret; but it is seldom that lettering comes amiss. the one objection to a border of lettering is, the difficulty there is likely to be in reading it from one position. that, however, does not apply to brasses and tombstones which you can walk round, or to a thing like a book cover, which you take in your hand and turn about. moreover, the difficulty is in great measure got over, say in the case of a door, by making the inscription run uninterruptedly round only three sides of the thing, and on the . part of an iron door in toledo cathedral. fourth (or bottom border) making it read as in the top one. this is seen in a portion of an iron door from the cathedral at toledo ( ). in a circular disc, where the ring of inscrip- tion is precisely analogous to the rectangular frame to a slab, the lettering naturally follow's round, in case the thing is small enough to be handled. in case it is not, the difficulty of changing the direction is not always very happily kn. on on moxx . greek coins in the british museum. managed, as may be seen in the mark of alfonso the wise ( ) ; nevertheless it is good lettering. for coins, seals, medals and so forth, lettering proves to be the absolutely perfect border. enclosed within marginal lines or without them, incised or in relief, singly or in double row, it frames the portrait or the coat of arms effectively, giving weight to the design just where it is wanted. not the least serviceable use of it is where it is made to pass, as it were, behind the image, forming something between a border and a back- ground to it. boldly used it never comes amiss. it is only the mean lettering of an artist who does not value it, would rather not use it, and is in fact half afraid of it, that is uninteresting. the great medallists who have given it the importance it deserves have never had cause to repent it. for all the value of the ring of inscription on a aachanart antipnoy ΒΑΣΙΛΕΣ kt staboabo bazue yokt. katy alan pl. pri cevettet apc akos % * . greek coins in the british museum. coin or medal, the scope of the designer does not end there: that is one way of doing it, but not the only one. it is the hard and fast rule we have adopted in modern days; but the greeks, who were our masters in art, and the medallists of the renaissance, knew better than to act on any one mechanical idea. the greeks, it will be seen ( , ), wrote the inscription across the coin, or in an upright line, or in two such lines, ge rar. leonellvs marchio desten sis d. fern sarie-regil-ety Ⓡet.mvtine . italian renaissance medal. or in one horizontal line (as a base for the figure), and lines at the two sides of the coin, and even in four straight lines giving a square within the circle. framed in double lines of inscription ( ) the figure is, as it were, set in a diaper of lettering. other devices are where the ground between the symbolic creature and its encircling wreath is diapered with lettering ( ), where the inscription is confined to a rectangular nisvs-rel i s-alpho w diws cccc wwum vir see sapi ensv stovuni tru soto amon xlviii to trivaphator et -pacific vs. . italian renaissance medal. frame within the circle, and where single letters are used to balance the composition ( )--and all this during the finest period of design. another beautiful use of single letters is seen in the ivory carving of a later period ( ). the medallists of the renaissance, as well as the greeks, often wrote inscriptions across the background to a portrait head ( , ). a second ring of incised lettering, within the outer band in relief ( ), is a convenient means of occupying the field of a medal without either confusing two separate inscriptions or calling undue attention to the less important of them. some modern medallists make good and characteristic use of lettering, but they employ sometimes too much of it to keep it bold enough. its proportion in the design of so small a thing as a coin or medal is all-important. the temptation appears to be to make it too small; but it seems to have been the constant endeavour of the great medallists to keep it as large as possible. go sic egreso ss almerivs foto vivo dine . italian renaissance medal. vi. scrolls or labels. pao a device from which very happy effects of decoration have resulted is that of a label, scroll, or ribbon, to bear an inscription. it is a means at once of giving dis- tinction to it and of introducing into the com- position lines invariably useful. its origin is not far to seek. a strip of parch- ment made a convenient ticket on which to write a name or description. . gothic such labels must often glass : the have been attached to things upon which they scratched were more or less a dis- figurement. the artist solid paint. naturally preferred to paint, or carve, or weave, his own label; and it seemed to him to give actuality to the thing if he represented also the buckling and the curling over of the ends of parchment, an accident sure to occur to it in the end. when he found that the cleavin esr: ddcfcios letters out of the turning over of the ends led to a characteristic form of ornament, he naturally developed the idea; and so we get the ornamental label, severe at first, eventually, as taste became more florid, twisting about in the most fantastic fashion. it takes, finally, the fluttering form of ribbon; but the effect was happier when it was less flimsily conceived, in the likeness, that is to say, of more robust strapwork. labels of the squarer ticket-like shape were often represented as if attached by pins to the surface of the thing they adorned. longer and more strip- like labels were invariably turned over or curled up at the ends; sometimes the ends were first split and then so treated. the twisting and twirling of the label itself was an affair partly of the reign- ing fashion of the day (severe in the thirteenth century, florid in the fifteenth), partly of the function of the particular label in question : it might not allow much scope for fancy, or, on the other hand, it might almost demand to be turned into ornament. the label is seen in its simplest form on the drug vases of the italian majolica painters, just a band of bold inscription between two lines which, upon examination, turn out to be the edges of a simple label, the indelible, and, at the same time, orna- mental, substitute for the common parchment ticket. the broad horizontal bands, also, which separate the subjects in a fourteenth or fifteenth century stained glass window, suggest the parch- swalavini . carving from the choir of the cathedral at albi. ment scroll; and so do the phylacteries in the hands of prophets and others, though these are . part of an ivory reading desk. made also to take a form more deliberately orna- mental, in order to occupy the background, or conveniently to cross the body of the figure. the sculptured figure from the wonderful church at albi ( ) is one of a series of prophets holding each his label, which both crosses the figure and occupies the background. it need hardly be pointed out how useful the line of the scroll is in the composition of the panel, and how well it contrasts with the name of the prophet horizontally incised in bolder lettering on the flat background in a line with his head. a commoner and more conventional form of label is that on the first page of this chapter ( ). such a label was planned to occupy the space about the head of the saint, descending in front of him ; the turn- over at the end was grasped in his hand. a similar but more elaborate use of the label occurs in four- teenth century tapestry, where it is seen curling about the heads of the personages, making quite a pattern in the upper part of the picture, or per- haps ( ) all over the background. labels, together .... where it makes a most appropriate accom- paniment to the central shield of arms. it is used also, for the sake of the meandering line given by its recurring form, in the broad borders of engraved brasses and appliqué embroidery. at times, too, other short contrasting scrolls ieri . plaque of gubbio faÏence. cross it at intervals, at an angle calculated to steady the flow of the foliage. the label is employed sometimes in coins, medals, and the like, but without so much reason. there is rarely need for it or room for it; the available space is better given to the lettering itself. it is happier as the border cf corporation or other important seals, and in medallions of larger dimensions it forms often a useful feature, the ends, as they turn about, satisfactorily occupy- ing the vacant ground. they are made even to fill it with their flourishing, as in the rather typical phl . plaque of gubbio faÏence. examples of italian majolica illustrated ( and ), in which the twisting of the label is a little too obviously designed to fill up. it is, no doubt, one very valuable use of the twisted scroll, that it does fill up a space; but it ought not to strike one at a glance as devised merely with that end. in so doing it confesses itself too l.o. : plainly a makeshift. there is less danger of betrayal when it is cunningly contrived to bear just the words wanted, and just as they should come ; which is hardly the case in these gubbio plaques, in both of which the label is, in fact, better suited to the inscription of two words than of one. the fact is, the label asks rather more conscientious design than we must expect from the italians of the cinque cento. it was said above that enclosing shapes should be designed with a view to the lettering to be inscribed upon them; and this applies with especial force to the label, which should be schemed to accommodate the words upon it. in fact, the position of the words needs first to be planned and the label designed to take them. given an existing space, it is the business of the artist to fit his design to it; but no practical designer would of his own accord first twist about a label and then begin to consider how best he could arrange the words within its lines. as well choose a canvas irrespective of the picture to be painted on it. the lettering is here the picture, so to speak, and the label but the canvas for it ; and, however fanciful its convolutions, they should be so contrived as to accommodate, not merely so much wording, but such and such words in the order of their reading. the question occurs as to the way the lettering ought to run. should it conscientiously follow canh d wer mica ottic www/ acy nemmice immer အမြို့ sborrar wulguliw.de martini . enlargement of a bookplate by h. s. beham. g planned the label bearing the words, “ all nations," better than that inscribed “in-dus-try.” an in- genious designer seldom finds himself compelled to break up his inscription awkwardly; he does not, for example, introduce a fold in the middle of a word; rather he reserves the fold to mark a break in the wording. he is careful to avoid the impression that his lettering was in any sense an afterthought. he designs the label for the words; and design is, literally, forethought. it is not pretended that labels have always been scrupulously designed. artists even who ought to have known better have before now shirked the difficulty of design, in so far discounting the merit of otherwise masterly work. it will be seen that the robust designs of hans sebald beham are not in this respect above reproach ; in the one case ( ) the letters flow evenly on, but are written upon both sides of the label ; in the other ( ) the words do not follow the direction of the label. the germans of the early sixteenth century made extraordinary use of the label in their design, more particularly in association with heraldry, and, to a man almost, designed it, as they did their mantling, with unfailing vigour and effect. a curious and perhaps unique instance of the length to which, already in the fifteenth century, they carried the device occurs in a carpet in the victoria and albert museum, a portion of which is illustrated senovasjao . old german lettering. fifteenth century. vii. hidden meanings. it has been contended in these pages that, though the first and usual purpose of lettering is that it shall be read with ease, there are occasions when easy reading is of secondary consequence (so long as it is readable enough), and that the more important consideration is decorative propriety. it is further maintained that its very legibility may under certain circumstances be endangered, and more than endangered, in the cause of ornament. plain reading is by no means the invariable purpose of lettering in ornament, and it is a mistake to suppose that it ought always to be read at sight, or readable at all, except to those whom it may concern. it may be intro- duced only for the satisfaction of those who have the key to its meaning-in which case all that the outside world has a right to ask is that it shall be ornamental; a sign or symbol which is a blot upon the design is indefensible from the standpoint of art. . iron bolt-plates. franÇois jer. miss the meaning of the words upon the scroll ingeniously composed to occupy the background to a picture of the annunciation ? one reads them by anticipation, and they may safely therefore be reduced to a form which in itself would not be easy to decipher. there is little difficulty in following even the most intricate of ornamental lettering when the very position of the words puts the reader on the track of their meaning. that, of course, is the justification of inscriptions such as that at the head of this chapter ( ); elsewhere it might be unreadable, occurring where it does in the gospels, it explains itself at a glance, secundum lucam. the use of the words is little more than a formality; they might almost be “taken as read.” the desirability of not clearly stating a meaning, still less of emphasising it, gives rise to the use of single letters only hinting at it ( ). even then the letter need not stand revealed in the naked form of the familiar alphabet. the florid initials upon the façade of the château at blois make more satis- factory ornament than the bald n which figured upon the walls of public buildings in paris in the time of napoleon the third : there was about that an air of advertisement in harmony only with the cheapest form of imperialism. the f of françois i er. was put to all manner of decorative purposes. the crowned f in the form of a bolt-plate ( ) is just a little too self-assertive. better for all purposes than the simple initial was the cypher, commonly used by henri ii., or the monogram—to which a chapter by itself is devoted. enough has been said to account for the meaning of lettering being hidden by the artist. the ways of hiding it are many. the letters themselves may be so playfully treated as to be disguised; they may be intricately interlaced, they may branch out into confusing ornament, or be half hidden in scrollery intertwined with it. in the case of the cunningly designed initial page from mr. walter crane's “ book of wedding days” ( ), the june roses grow from thorny stems which spell the name of the month, half lost in leaves and further hidden by the cupid errant with his shield. a much simpler growth of ornamental lines is enough to transform words van. into ornament out of which the meaning emerges as you look. in the masterly design of israel van meckenen ( ), the letters of his name, israel m, are delibe- rately designed to look like scroll- work merely, in which a casual observer would not suspect there lurked a meaning. they form, it will be seen, a fine panel of florid ornament, satisfactory decoration apart from the significance of the lines on which it grows. the con- fusion, more or less, that may result n from interlacing letters not in them- . a page from selves very fantastic, is seen in the the “book renderings of the word prophet of wedding days," by ( , ). where two separate walter crane. words are interlaced ( ), the disguise is naturally more complete, each, as it were, entangling the sense of the other. by merely taking liberties with the letters themselves (to some extent necessitated in order to adapt them to fretwork in ivory) the portuguese artist respon- sible for the cabinet in the cluny museum from which the words audeo-spero ( ) are taken has brought them to the desired condition of orna- ment which does not thrust its meaning on you. a simple means of preventing words from staring at you is, to break the continuity of the letters by colouring them arbitrarily, as was done in early saxon manuscripts. the obtrusiveness of individual letters may be guarded against in a similar way by breaking them into parti- colour, so that the forms which strike the eye are only parts of letters, and do not insist upon the fact that they have a meaning. the particular character employed in the old german embroidery from which the letters overleaf ( ) are taken, seems to us at this date hardly to necessitate further removal from the obvious; but the needle- woman evidently meant to make sure they should not be too evident; and so, not merely confused them with ornamental foliation and tendrils, but rendered them in colours which may be said to blur any possible distinctness of statement con- veyed in them. severer forms of letters might with even more reason be treated in the same way and so reduced to ornament. the sculptor or - modeller may arrive at a similar result by varying . engraving by israel van meckenen. l.o. . german gothic embroidery. the relief and the texture of his letters instead of the colour. the fringe of cloisoned letters dependant from the seventh century visigothic crown ( ) is a singularly happy device; barbaric it may be, but admirably ornamental. this is a votive crown, it will be understood, designed to be hung up before a shrine, not worn on the head. it was dug up in the neighbourhood of toledo, and one seems to trace in it the influence of moorish ingenuity in ornamental device. by no possible chance could the name of the donor, reccessvinthus, intrude itself. it is there by way of record ; to the casual observer it is ornament. the degree of illegibility permissible in orna- mental lettering is determined only by the purpose of it. what is meant to be hidden may well lie hid from all but those who have the key of the mystery. even where the secret is an open one, there may be a charm in the mystery in which it is wrapped. if it is a riddle, we have a right to expect it to be possible of solution. if it is meant to be readable, it should not puzzle us beyond measure. it is annoying to suspect, as we cannot help suspect- ing, that the designer meant us to unriddle many wwws s மாயமாilruicasin mரை t od ddr ). arc rodaje veiling in ? palauteticambia nowotw juni . visigothic votive crown of the th century. a seventeenth and eighteenth century cypher, which after all our pains remains to us a mystery. the handsome panel from a cabinet in the victoria and albert museum ( ) has all the h i air of telling us more than it does. was that the intention of the carver, or was it not ? a printer's or a mer- chant's mark , ) is often built up of lettering not easy to read; and it need not be readable; it is his sign, known to be such; and that is enough. so, too, a stamp, such as that of domitian, which forms the tailpiece to this . merchant's mark. . chapter ( ), might well be less easy to read than it is, and yet perfectly fulfil its function. it is difficult for us to realize how clearly the meaning may be expressed in lettering which we do not understand. all the unlearned can say of the icelandic ( ), the sla- vonic ( , ), the chinese, the arab, or other to them strange character, is that it is most satisfactory as ornament; and the fact that, as such, it interests . merchant's mark. them, speaks eloquently for c.e.g. ccccc ioi wm lor the decorative use made of it. possibly it would strike us as less entirely ornamental if we could read it; we find it perhaps all the more ornamental because it cannot possibly intrude upon our ignorance; but there is no doubt of its being ornamentally rendered. it seems certain, too, that the eastern artist was allowed an enviable liberty of rendering, which enabled him to reach something like the per- fection of lettering in ornament. the short and seemingly simple inscrip- tion on the persian mirror back ( ) is not to be read right off. even an accomplished orientalist takes his time to puzzle out the words, “o, thou satisfier of wants.” the writing of the arabs. is, of itself, enough to show that they were not often in a hurry. in the use of it in ornament they took it for granted that the reader would be more than leisurely. prohibited by the laws of the prophet from picturing god's creatures, and desiring, after the manner of mankind, to say something . icelandic in their design, they indulged pro- mangling im- fusely in inscription ; and their natural plement. ol van gil vrte . russian ornamental lettering by victor vasnetzoff. ingenuity and ornamental instinct not being hampered by any popular prejudice against free and fanciful treatment of the alphabet, they did marvels in the way of beautiful design, more ela- borate it is true than is our western wont, but undeniably the work of masters in their art ( ). lettering forms one of the most striking features in what we call arab art. we find it in the lustred tiles, the enamelled glass, the fretted brass of the persians; in the plaster-work of the alhambra and other buildings of the moors in spain ; in the wood-carving of the tunisians; in the embroidery of the turks; in saracenic silk-weaving; in illuminated copies of the koran; throughout, in fact, the whole range of mohammedan design. the power of the artist is shown in the perfect wÁkustektobeck . slavonic inscription of the th century. . the word “allah " forming an ornamental device. there is clearly not anything like the same elasticity in roman or gothic lettering as in arab, nor have we the mastery of those eastern ornamentists over the signs and symbols with which we have to deal; but the lesson of their work ought not to be entirely lost upon us; and it would be interesting to see what we could do in emulation of their manner. the result would probably not meet with popular approval; but it might be well worth the pains; and in particular we might learn the way to hide a meaning in our prova . the word "prophet" in italics. ornament, and to hide it just as effectually as seemed good to us--to screen it, if need be, from all but sympathetic observation. the few experiments here given ( , , ) do not, in the least, pretend to show what is to be done . the word "allah" in this way: they are after the manner of but a beginning, an a chinese seal. . the word “prophet” in interlacing strap-like letters. indication, merely, of the direction in which experiment might be worth making. something, too, is to be learnt from the severely square-cut chinese character ( ), as well as from their freer brush-writing (the two styles have analogies with the cufic and neskhi respectively), and from other script, which, in proportion as we do not understand a word of it, we can judge without bias as ornament. our western temperament puts us at some dis- advantage. we are a matter-of-fact people, and the practical view we take of lettering hinders us from making full use of it in ornament. our attitude towards the alphabet is somewhat too respectful. if we could bring ourselves to play with letters we might easily reduce them to ornament. the first step is to believe in the possibilities of lettering: only in that faith is art possible. . iron stamp. byzantine. sidic sivus . enamelled bronze pendant. viii. conjoined letters. we are to a great extent debarred from the use of contractions, which, obvious as they must have been to monkish readers, to whom mediæval writing was addressed, are enough to scare a modern one from the very attempt to decipher old manuscripts abounding with them. but there is no such undeniable objection to the mere conjoining of letters in the old way. a certain amount even of complication might be excused, where the writer did not wish to be too plain, or had a right to expect the reader would anticipate the word. there are cases without number in which it is clear from the first word or two of an inscription what is to follow. it may safely be taken for granted that the faithful will not want to read through the crede, the ave, or the lord's prayer. there is no need to spell out every word of a familiar quotation; and if there were, there it is, though not as plain as print. any hardship the reader might suffer from the conjunction, here and there, of letters other- wise awkward to manage, would be as nothing to the convenience it would be to the designer, who, as it is, is tied by popular prejudice as never ancient writer was fettered. but there is not necessarily any confusion resulting from conjoined letters. the wording on the doors of le puy ( ), in which it is carried to most interesting excess, is, it is true, only with difficulty to be deciphered- which may be said also of the gothic inscription from a flemish brass ( ); but the compound letters add no little to its variety, and were pre- sumably not difficult to read at the time they were written. it is mainly the misplaced satisfaction of the philistine with printed type which inclines him to resent the liberties a writer is naturally tempted to take with forms the printer has stereotyped. time was when even printers were not averse to combined letters (accustomed as folk were to them in ms.), but the diphthong and the ampersand alone survive, and that mainly in the form of &c. this particular sign was never at the best of much artistic use—it does not range with the line for one thing- but why not simply join the letters? we have only iio dematerik et titre ope; doorwerviti k ofte bine if azmi vo . from a to let the two upright strokes of the n form on the one side part of the a, and on the other part of the d ( ), and we have a perfect monogram which, moreover, acknowledges by its contrac- tion the comparative insignificance of the word. at all events a writer is free to indulge in any such monogrammic device which does not interfere with the legibility at which he aims; whatever helps the artist in spacing his letters is to the good. there is no occasion to keep sacred the separate identity i xxq&aÆ © © © ieor . diagram of conjoint letters. confessed, but turned if possible to characteristic account. what though the monotony of hard and fast form is inseparable from a page set up in type ? the penman, painter, carver, engraver, or other craftsman claims that he, for his part, shall be allowed to show, by deviation from the fixed forms of printed type, he has used his brains about his work; and his just claim is not invalidated by the incompetence of this scribe or the affectation of that. the word engraved within the wreath overleaf, from a piece of old roman silversmith's work ( ), was probably meant to tell no more than it does. ad anno herv gott . diagram of conjoint letters. . em s, continuous. ix. monograms. the use of conjoined letters and contractions leads immediately to the design of the monogram —which is in fact neither more nor less than a contraction—two or more letters writ in one. a monogram is a compound letter, or, as its name implies, the combination in one sign (simple or complex) of two or more letters no longer separate. whether the letters form, as in the beginning they apparently did, the first letters of a word (xp for xpixtos), or whether they are the initials of a man's several names, as is the more common use nowadays, does not matter, nor whether they are used as badge, symbol, or trade-mark; the point is that it is one sign conveying the significance of several letters. in a monogram, rightly so called, there is no letter which does not form part of another ( ). this is not generally understood, or we should not hom u dom vun عيالها tap ma w 工 ​< ( bade rbs gpm. da ama sab . monograms. i commonly hear the interlacing of any two or three letters described as a monogram. the interlacing i.h.s., for example, whether we read the letters to signify jesus hominum salvator or ihoye, are not properly called the sacred monogram, nor the intertwining a and , nor the initial letters of xpietos, except when one limb of the x forms the stroke of the p. the rule that no one letter in a monogram shall be independent, but that each letter shall form part of another, makes the design of monograms no very easy pas- time. much depends upon the letters to be joined in one. it is not as if, in naming chil- dren, sponsors d the . old weight. convenience of designers ; and grains. they provide some of their godchildren with initials which seem bent upon maintaining entire independence. whether they are absolutely irreconcilable re- mains in each case to be proved. one may have spent hours in vainly trying to bring them to- gether, and all at once they come, as it were, of their own accord. as an instance of the likelihood of happy combination, i have taken the letters of the alphabet and tried what could be done with them, three by three, as they came, at a short sitting ( ). the monograms are by no means perfect; two or three of them do not read in the order of the letters in the alphabet; but that is the best i could do right off, and i give the results as they came. they come well enough, i think, bog kdo iwx . the alphabet in monograms of three letters, to promise a fair likelihood that letters, take them as they come, will be amenable to ingenious treatment. if they are by no possible means to be reduced to a single sign, that may be enough reason for . f l, reversible. . s p l, continuous. interlacing them, or tying them together, or other- wise bringing them to the condition of ornament; but the result, beautiful or otherwise, will not be a monogram ; and should not be so described. it causes only confusion to call things by names to which they are not entitled. the one case in which there can be a question as to the title of monogram is, where the letters, though in a sense independent, are continuous ( , ). it is sometimes possible to devise a mono- gram in which one letter forms part of another and yet the line is continuous, and the contrivance adds interest to the design ( , , and d); but any device drawn in one stroke might claim etymologically to be a monogram, even though one of the component letters could be removed • and leave the others complete. a reversible design, which you may turn upside down and it reads the same, is a rare possibility ( ). lr sur . by holbein. . by holbein. character render it unfit. it is quite true that lombardic capitals, for example, are exceptionally amenable, all the more so as their shapes are not so definitely fixed as the roman, and one may with less offence take liberty with them ; but, though there is something final about the form of roman lettering, and its lines are straight and rigid-holbein himself could not always bend it to his purpose ( , )—it is by no means always unmanageable, and when it does lend itself to the combination desired, the resultant monogram has a sort of dignity all its own. it is a great convenience to have two or more forms of a single letter to choose from. the rounded form may offer possibilities which the angular does not, and vice versa. it is not, by the way, always a question of roman or gothic character, as may be seen in the diagram opposite ( ). there is scope for choice within the range of either roman or gothic. absolute symmetry is not essential to satis- factory design, but there must be in it a sense i of balance; and in pursuit of it the designer is tempted, not merely to tamper with the shapes of letters, but to place them out of their order. it is better that the natural sequence of the letters should be at once apparent in the monogram ; but in any case it should not be so flagrantly violated as to compel one to read them awrong. so also with regard to the value of the letters, their relative importance should be maintained. in the letters aa he Ά ΜΜ c d mm © a mm ee nn ee nn gg t mm ww . diagram indicative of variety in available letter shapes. of a single name the initial would naturally domi- nate. in the case of initials it might be desirable to insist either upon the christian or the surname, or to pronounce the two equally, or to relegate to insignificance the second of two christian names habitually dropped. only for some good reason should the letters of a monogram differ widely in size. they need not be all of a size, but there should be no appear- ance of any difference in scale. this is the more in order to illustrate in a practical way some of the points above discussed, i have taken the letters of the word the and made monograms of them ( , , , ). it will be seen that they lend themselves to a variety of combinations, some of which read in the order of the word, and others do not—though these last were really written in the right order. in most the t is made to take its due prominence; occasionally it is a capital followed by minuscules. those of them which read in the order t e h are, in so far, unsatisfac- tory. in two instances (h and c ) it is only by a slightly fanciful treatment of the termina- tion of the e that the letters are completely made out. the kind of balance observed in k is a thing to aim at in monogram design. of the minuscule versions ( ) a is readable only if we accept a disconsonant h; b is not a monogram at all; and c reads eth. supposing the letters th e stood for the initials of a man's name, it would be desirable to give importance to the e of the surname, and the h might possibly, as only the second christian name, take quite a back place in the design. the point is that the letters should retain as nearly as possible their actual value. another condition which enters into the design monograms the. b. c. . monograms the. d. of a monogram is, the space it has to fill, or, failing that, the shape it will give. a given space to occupy may put out of the question an other- wise possible composition. a given arrangement of letters may compel a circular, upright, squat, or irregular shape, as the case may be. a cartouche or other shape enclosing a mono- gram ( , ) may help to bring the compo- sition together ; but is no part of the mono- gram. a monogram if well designed should stand alone. to fall back upon the frame for help is, in a measure, to confess yourself beaten; but if the frame exists to begin with, then you have a right to rely upon its lines; in fact it is one of the conditions to which you have to conform. another confession of weakness is to resort, in the design of a monogram as such (and not as an ornamental device for some particular decorative purpose), to ultra-fantastic treatment of the letter forms, and a yet more abject one is the introduc- tion of independent ornament. there would be less occasion for any such makeshifts, were we not possessed by a demon of symmetry. we forget that it is not equal- sidedness but balance that is essential; and that there is a compensating charm in cha- racter. this is not to say there may not be good reason for devices in which for some symbolic or . lf d, with other sufficient purpose an em- border, stencilled. blem is included. the excuse is the more sufficient when the symbolism (as in the case of the rays in , which hold the stencil plate together) fulfils some practical purpose. the component parts of a monogram should be coherent, consequent, and quite clearly belonging to the letters they unite to represent; but the designer need have no compunction in departing widely from the normal proportion and symmetry observable in the separate letters. the consideration is now the shapeliness of the monogram, not of the individual letters of which it is made up. the letters may be of the artist's own designing; he is bound to . lfd, with back- ground device,stencilled. no alphabet: but they . reversed cypher, french wood-carving. x. cyphers. even if it were within the scope of design to make any given letters into a monogram, the only possible one would many a time be ugly. in such case an artist naturally discards the idea and falls back upon cypher: he may indeed in any case prefer that device as the more appropriate to his ornamental purpose ; at all events it is never the forlorn hope which a monogram may be. a cypher differs from a monogram in that it is not a contraction, not a separate sign compounded of several letters, but a commingling or interlacing of signs, each of which is in itself a perfect and independent letter, the one as it were planted in l.o. front of the other, or, more commonly, entangled with it. letters thus interlocked are commonly accepted as monograms; but, though they pass current, they are not coin of the realm. for the rest, however, the rules which govern the com- position of the cypher are very much the same as those to which the monogram is subject. lettering of all kinds lends itself to this device of cunning interlacing, but none perhaps so readily as cursive writing, the flowing forms of which were so commonly employed by the designers of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, to whom the straight line, ever-recurrent in the upright roman letter, was abhorrent. so entirely did they adopt this one slanting form of letter, that it is some- times assumed that the term cypher applies only to letters of the cursive type; but this is not so. it is further fallaciously assumed that a cypher must be absolutely symmetrical. there was once a generation of artists who apparently determined . glass quarries with monogram and cyphers. sex . wrought-iron cypher, reversed. necessity for reversal was never very great, seeing that designers were not hampered by any thought of keeping strictly to the letter, but indulged quite freely in wreathing lines of ornamental scrollwork only in so far part of the lettering that they grew out of it. an inventive mind might readily by means of such extraneous ornament have made good the balance of design, and so avoided all occasion for reversing letters; but the real truth is, that letters sloping all one way. do not naturally lend themselves to symmetric design. the confusion which comes of overturning letters is worse confounded by the fact that one letter reversed may in combination with the . painted tiles, with cypher ? i c. thuty . கல் ண் ண் cad quano வ o a b moris g & ta sis ' paad cassas samsa iii. bookbinding tooled with cypher diaper j l reversed. lines of another letter give a third which is perhaps not needed. the letter e in the wrought-iron cypher illustrated ( ) might be the accidental result of inverting the b, or vice versa. a difficulty with which the designer has to contend is that (say) of three letters, two perhaps . cyphers, not reversed, carved. unite as it were inevitably into a single sign, whereas the other refuses obstinately to give up its independence. the result is, properly speaking, neither a monogram nor a cypher; but something between the two, and, by reason of its indeter- minateness, not quite satisfactory, though per- haps the best possible under the circumstances. reason that it is the best that could possibly be done with given letters. that is so in the case, for instance, of the familiar combination of a hd in the monogram of henri deux and diane, which, frequently as it occurs in work done for . cypher g r s. the king or his mistress, seems never to come amiss. it has a dignity which the sloping italics of later date never reach; and it is difficult to imagine how it could be bettered. again, in the ɔ i c in painted tile work of the same period ( ) it will be seen that the beautiful severity of the letters, . cypher b e. their proportion, and the simplicity of their compo- sition, give an air of distinction to a cypher which, less perfectly proportioned, might have been mean or commonplace. orna- mental devices of this kind are so readily resolvable into their elements that there is no possi- bility of the confusion always likely to occur when intricately interlacing forms are reversed. for a similar reason one has . cypher w s. wanawa * nothing to say against the reversal of a single letter, the double c, for example, of charles viii., and of our own charles ii. if the artist can make a satisfactory badge or ornamental device out of a letter, he is within his province: the condition is that he shall make ornament of it. even for more fanciful reversing, the excuse of ornament holds good. as a cypher of the letters j l, the device on page ( ) is very much like other interlacings of the period : as an ornamental diaper, it makes most excellent decoration in tooling the determination to abstain from turning letters over results in a form of severity ( ) of which lovers of symmetry do not approve. bookbinders made admirable use of the simple initial as a repeat, with or without a surmounting crown, in binding books for royal patrons such as louis xiii. before that the crowned f of françois ier figured prominently in the details of his châteaux. as for the h of henri ii., it was used in such a plain and simple way that one almost wonders how it is that it does not look bald. it forms, however, perfectly adequate decoration, owing to the extremely judicious way in which it was everywhere introduced. in the fine ceiling of the salle de diane, at fontainebleau ( ), both the simple h of henri and the monogram ( h d are used in a quite masterly way. one is apt to associate the idea of o . cyphers a m, i hs, a n. monograms and cyphers with something small or finikin ; but the breadth and dignity of decoration such as that is unsurpassed. enough, however, about reversing; let us return to the cypher. the interlacing of separate letters does not hinder them from being each of a different colour (b ), by aid of which colour (or in the . ... . cypher i hc. case of carving it might be texture) letters most intricately interwoven may be traced and easily identified. by the same means any one letter may be emphasised at will. thanks, therefore, to colour, or to texture, the artist is enabled safely to venture upon combinations of letters which, apart from it, would be inextricably involved. of the gothic minuscule cyphers on page the the tailpiece below is not so much a cypher as a symbolic device in which a cypher is included- that being of course quite a right thing to do, though it is not precisely cypher design. it is one thing to design a monogram, it is another to design it for a specific place or purpose, or to include it in some scheme of decoration. here as elsewhere there are few things the artist, for all that may be said to the contrary, dare not do with lettering, provided only he is competent, and that he cares for lettering. if he loves it, he may safely be trusted with it. . device including cypher and masonic symbol. www enne mi m whose plain business it is to enlighten us, and that without great tax upon our attention. deviation from accepted form, prompted by the artistic conscience, may be in one or more of several directions. the designer is open to suggestions arising out of his scheme of decoration, out of the nature of the inscription, out of the position it is to occupy, out of the material in which and the implement with which it is to be written; and, apart from de- liberate decorative purpose, and no matter what the general character of the lettering he may adopt (that may be deter- mined for him by architectural and other considerations) the implementand methodemployed . stamp. the. in rendering it will affect his letter in metal rendering, removing the lettering i somewhat from theoriginal type, and giving it a character more or less of its own. we do not want telling whether lettering was written with a pen, or painted with a brush; indented with a point in something soft, or cut with a chisel out of something hard ; we see at once that it was cut in wood, or stone, or metal, and whether it was incised or grounded out. the inevitable character of its execution is seen even in work which is meant to be graphic and no more, and it is seen to be so much to the good as art. tape on rough deal. pour estre celebre po rriie du mois de juli estre distribues iiți conuertis en pains aurr celebrant diach . part of a flemish slab ings, and, almost in spite of himself, gave it character. the rudeness of the work enables us in this instance the better to see how design is influenced by the conditions under which work is done. but similar influences may be seen at work in the letters engraved upon greek coins, which look sometimes ( ) almost as if the die-sinker had set about elaborating the greek character, so curiously are the letters rounded at the points. very little consideration shows us, however, that he had no such fantastic idea. it simply happened in that way. there was always a danger, in cutting short sharp lines with no matter what implement, of overshooting the mark. a safeguard was, first to drill holes at the points where the lines met or ended, and then engrave the lines from hole to r chun an enuiron te t, auquer a ordonnie tts de bred froment blancg de čen la ras kloubdiacre,parens cut in stone or slate. hole. that is what he did with the result that the drill marks, not being effaced, assert them- selves sufficiently to give a quite peculiar character to the writing. in the case of the coins of course the strokes end in little pearls. a precisely similar device is adopted in a greek inscription on a bronze tablet in the museum at naples, where the engraver has evidently begun by boring holes at the points where the lines of his letters are to end, omitting, however, to do so where, as in the case of the bar of an a, the grooved lines already cut were all the help he wanted—thus clearly showing the practical purpose of the little cells at the ends of the longer strokes. penmanship is writ large upon the initials of the gothic scribes and in many of the engraved initials founded upon penwork ( ). the . fretted ivory plaques. portuguese. out. letters of about the same period cut in stone ( ) have quite a different look. so also the white letter upon a black ground, with its background of thin foliage, etc., in certain wood- cut initials ( , etc.) is plainly not altogether unaffected by the fact that the white parts repre- sent the cutting away of the wood. in like manner the square-cut characters on the icelandic match- box ( ) remind one of the knife with which they were cut; and one can see, in the rendering of lombardic capitals in gothic glass painting ( ), that they were scratched with a point out of a layer of pigment on the glass. the letters audeo, spero ( ) have a certain portu- guese character, but the character of fretwork is more emphatically marked in them than that of nationality; and the cyphers which form so frequent a feature upon old key-bows ( , ) are, as it were, translated into pierced and engraved metal. the name on the italian comb-case ( ) tells, not only that it belonged to a de boen, but that it was chased on leather. ca rose . cut leather. italian. in event of an artist not duly observing the character proper to material, it has a way of retaliating. the inscription, for example, on the beautiful french lock opposite ( ), is too much of a tour-de-force in piercing; the letters are over frail for chiselled iron, with the result that the inscription is in a lamentably ruinous condition. the iron has here its obvious revenge upon the designer. character, then, and it may be ornamental character, comes of allowing material and the way it is worked to have a hand in shaping it; and the ornamentist is not merely safe in following the lead thus given to his invention, but foolhardy in not following it. further, his own personality, presuming him to have one, will find expression in his rendering of no matter what alphabet by no matter what method - it will be just as much his handwriting as though he had written it with a fountain pen upon a sheet of cream-laid note. furthermore, the exigencies of composition will ervomaatate ibidatti ctaliscotshui a . gothic iron lock-plate. suggest innumerable modifications of the letters as they appear in the copy-book, and an artist were no artist if he did not venture upon them. it would be absurd for a designer not to prolong the tail of a letter if he wanted it to fill a space, or otherwise to assert the rights of art, as explained above in reference to handwriting. in the word sten- cilling ( ), the heads of c and g and the tails of e and l are lengthened with a view, not only to artistic effect, but to the strengthening of the stencil plate. it is when artistic devices make clearly for workmanlikeness, and workmanlike expedients for artistic effect, that the design of lettering (as of all ornament) proves thoroughly satisfactory. there is, however, scope for ornamental letter- ing beyond this. the designer is, in strict justice, at liberty in many cases deliberately to make his letter-shapes ornamental; though the right is in these days of matter-of-fact so grudgingly allowed to the artist that it might almost as well be denied him. the wider tolerance in this respect in days before type-printing led to the devising of delightful lettering ( ). there are two ways of designing ornamental lettering. the one is to compel the letters into the shape of ornament. this was the idea of the byzantine and other primitive illuminators. but as early as the sixth or seventh centuries writers began to be diverted from the path of ornament pure and simple by the unnatural—or is it only too natural ?-delight in torturing the forms of birds, beasts, fishes and imaginary monsters into some- thing which might do duty for lettering. the ornamental pranks with them, in making, if need were, letters which were unmistakably ornamental, ornament which was unmistakably lettering. with the advent of printing, and the inevitably fixed type of the founder, a blight of uniformity spread from the printer to the scribe: the ideal of freedom declined; but, so long as the gothic spirit lingered, designers would still at times sport with the shape of a letter. what a variety of shapes a single letter takes ( ) in even printed initials of the days when printing was yet young ! in the case of handwriting the artist was con- trolled only by his own taste, which, until the time when late german penmanship went off into an hysteria of incoherent flourishes, seldom failed him : there is, we may say, no standard type of lombardic lettering; but, with all its variety of proportion and shape, it seldom goes far astray from fitness or beauty. this applies to the main outline of the letter. lombardic and gothic capitals generally allowed of very considerable variation in the parts of the letter, in the thicken- ing of the curved lines, in the curving of the relatively straight-all of which made for orna- ment. the next step in that direction was to play with the lines of contour, to fret the outline as it were, and slightly to foliate it, but at first only so slightly as barely to interfere with it. at junctures, too, where two lines met ( ), a loop was often substituted for the point, and this loop developed at times into a very effec- tive ornamental feature. it had been, it will be remembered, from the time of the keltic scribes, a practice to elaborate the letter by interlacing, 顯 ​顯 ​ mw oso . varieties of the letter a from early printed books. and some of the most charming letters of the six- teenth century depend upon interlacing for their ornament ( , ). the slight foliation of the terminations of the letters develops finally into free, and it may be florid, growth, which, according to its degree and en w elt . too much the effect of having been put together. the ebullition of ornament out of the slender lines of the italics in illustration is rather sudden, but it is directed by a sense of grace. in the letters of the word regina on the prayer- book of mary tudor ( ), the ornament is in part very ob- viously added to the letter; it is as if the gold smith had first made his letters and then belted them. such added ornament has generally the appearance of . grotesque woodcut. . an excrescence; here it is judi- ciously employed, and results, for once, in adequate decoration. the abuse of ornamental lettering is patent to every one. marvels of ugliness have been per- petrated in its name. so little is lettering esteemed among us nowadays that it is usually left to the incompetent hands of draughtsmen, who look upon l.o. wurm m ornament as a convenient means of disguising faults of penmanship or draughtsmanship. as to the use of ornamental lettering, there is . french wood carving. franÇois er. plenty of room for divergence of opinion; but, admitting that in serious inscription ornament may be for the most part out of place, it has its place in lettering, and a very useful one. the artist's calling is not of such a grave and lofty nature that he may never descend from the heights of academic design and indulge in the frivolity of ornament—if so it be considered. the potter plays with his brush, the needlewoman with her thread; to the worker work becomes play; and his playfulness touches, if only because it is a sure sign of enjoyment in the work, a sympathetic chord in us, and wins our approbation. . frivolity in lettering. xii. initial letters. to many the idea of lettering in ornament will suggest at once the thought of initial letters, for the most part, though not necessarily, dis- tinguished by ornament-their essential peculiarity being that they do distinguish themselves, in whatever way, from the surrounding text. it is in books, manuscript or printed, that initials are most useful. there is less occasion for them in mural and decorative inscriptions, where even distinctive capitals are not always necessary. in fact, with the one exception of black-letter, inscriptions are happiest all in capitals. the minuscule was not adopted for architectural or monumental purposes until a period when design was fast losing its dignity: it belongs to parch- ment and paper; and with it are associated the capital and the initial. the ostensible purpose of an initial letter, it is a truism to say, is to mark a beginning, the point at which the reader is to begin, or to begin anew. the term “versal” is only another name for what is practically the same thing, the letter, namely, to which the officiating priest shall turn. the decoration of this letter is by way of signal or reminder. the initial heads the chapter as the capital heads the sentence. it is writ large and beautiful by way of emphasis, more or less; and by strict rights the letter should be glorified in proportion to the importance of its position. logically, as well as artistically speaking, there is no reason why several series of initials should not be used, with varying emphasis, upon a single page; but it would not seem to the printer worth his while, and it would sorely tax the judgment of the compositor. an initial, however, is not emphatic according merely to its size. in common speech a word is more effectually emphasised by a pause before its utterance than by shouting it. and the notion of pause explains and justifies a certain disregard of immediate legibility in the initial. there, if anywhere, the artist may give loose to his fancy. ornament which elsewhere might be distracting is - here attractive, literally of use, that is to say, in calling attention to the letter ( ). a pause before the reader begins or resumes his parable is not without dramatic effect, and a letter must be indeed entangled with ornament if during that respite it has not plainly distinguished itself. there are occasions, again, where it may be taken for granted that the reader expects a certain letter, in which case there is no need to aos wi wpis hood nh . initials by israel van meckenen. . . from an illuminated choir book at siena. making of which there goes a dignity inseparable from reticence and self-control. the air of wild gesticulation so characteristic of a certain class of illuminated initials is enough of itself to convict them of extravagance. they presume, too, on the mere grounds that they are put in by hand, to sprawl over the page as though it were theirs. it is all of a piece with the incli- nation of the illuminator to look upon the margin of a book as a fair field for his exploits. it is not to be wondered at if, in the scarcity of parchment and paper, the mediæval artist seized upon the margins of the books which came within his grasp. his excuse will serve us, however, no longer. let us have initials, by all means, and borders too, for that matter, but let them be ornamentally rendered. it was not enough for them that the shape of it was ornamental, there must needs be ornament or foliage also, interlacing with it, or forming, it might be, a rich background to the letter ( , ). eventually, with the renaissance, when letter shapes became more definitely fixed, ornament was confined entirely to the background ( ). colour is, of course, the exception in printed books. but even in black and white one gets . woodcut initials. french. as nearly as possible its equivalent by means of ornament which, according to its density, tells lighter than a solid black letter or darker than a letter merely in outline, and gives a patch of com- paratively solid print, calculated to call more peremptory attention to it than a naked letter of the same proportions would do. this froth of ornament about a letter may be regarded as a sort of danger signal, no more to be mistaken than the foam about a rock not otherwise clearly distinguishable. a haze sr . woodcut initials. french. of ornament, on the other hand, in which the letter is lost to view, is in itself a danger. still, in the case of a letter big and heavy enough to hold its own, a tint of ornament is useful, in softening its lines and mitigating what might, but for it, have been a harsh and brutal contrast between its blackness and the white paper ( ). it has the further use of doing away with the blarik unprinted area about it which otherwise would tell as a gap in the type; and may readily be designed to give (and naturally is designed to give) a compact right-lined device ranging con- veniently with the lines of the text. except where the letter itself takes square lines (which it cannot oodcut initials. italian. a d . woodcut initials. german. always be made to do), something of the kind seems to be almost necessary. we get by means of such ornamental framing to the initial a rectangular patch of print which there is no overlooking; and within this, attention once called to it, the form of the letter is promptly perceived. moreover, such uniform patches break the page more pleasantly than initials of varying contour would be likely to do. upon this customary tune of a letter involved in ornament, or set in a framework or against a background of ornament, very interesting varia- tions were played throughout the sixteenth century. at times such ornament was made to follow closely the lines of the letter ( ), at times to contrast with them ( , ), at times apparently to take little or no account of them ( ); but apparently only; for the very test of an artist's capacity for such design is that . woodcut initials by g. tory. range from solid black ornament to pattern in outline only, from mere diaper to vigorous arabesque or foliage, to say nothing of eventual picture. a heavy letter against a lighter background of ornament was naturally the first to occur to the artist ( ). but he did not stop there. letters in outline relieve themselves quite enough against a more solid scrollwork, as may be seen in a french alphabet of which two letters are here repro- duced ( ), where the niello-like enrichment gives importance to otherwise modest initials, even if if it does not make them easier to read than they would be without it. this is a case, by the way (others occur in , ), in which the rectangular shape is clearly enough marked without aid of enclosing outline. the feat of making black letters clear themselves orbit dos ova show ouyaa : . woodcut initials. french. mentists were before him in the field, and had done good work before he entered it. the one uniformly unsatisfactory way of relieving a letter against its background is to shade it, whether by merely thickening the outline on one side of it, or by throwing half of it in shadow, as though it stood up upon the page. theoretically the shading makes the letter "stand out”; but it does not make it more easily readable; it simply vulgarises it. it looks as if in the initials d. i. ( ) the rather clumsy outline, black against a background of lines giving a half tint, were meant to suggest relief. if it is desirable to reduce the volume of white in an initial too assertive on its dark ground, a simple expedient is to introduce into it a central line of black, as frequently was done ( ). this may suggest perhaps the idea of incising, but n tolle re . holbein's “dance of death." grows dim. happily, the modern picture is independent of lettering; it has been left to the advertiser (who is not easily put to shame) to print across it, or on the foreground, or on the sky behind, his name and the description of the wares he has to sell. why not? it may be asked, if sir e. burne-jones and the old assyrians are justified. the answer is simple: it all depends upon the scheme and treatment of the picture. the letter- ing, which is an integral part of the composition, adorns a picture; that which is not, is a blemish upon it. the picture must be such that without the lettering it would be incomplete. the designers even of the sixteenth century often hesitate between the graphic and the wesi mites . “dance of death " initials. german. decorative motive, and especially between the use of arabesque ornament and of figures. they are most completely happy with ornament, but they are happy also with “putti,” as the italians called them, not children precisely, but robust little would-be baby forms playing about, and always playfully presented. perhaps it is because they are so entirely the children of the artist's brain wwwmmte wwwww whith . woodcut initials. german. that he is so fond of them. some of the best of these boy figures are attributed to holbein ( ). they measure only about two inches across, but it would be difficult to find, except perhaps in greek coins of the finest period, larger treatment of design in little. another fine alphabet ( ) is ascribed to dürer, on what authority i know not, perhaps because the letters are evidently the work of a strong man not endowed with any very subtle image! id comar a r mu .' woodcut initials, with medallion heads. appreciation of beauty. it is in the spirit of the italian renaissance that godfrey sykes designed an alphabet ( ) not precisely of initials : the letters are meant to spell inscriptions for the decoration of the refreshment room at the victoria and albert museum, and were executed in glazed majolica—white figures on a yellow ground: the modelling of the figures can be better appreciated in the larger version of the letter s ( ). the artist was one who, following in the steps of alfred stevens, went back for inspiration to a source it is the fashion with us to neglect just now—by which neglect our modern design is greatly the sufferer. in the initials of the elder cranach ( ) one italir - " . woodcut initials, with architectural background. may trace the influence of the goldsmith. they might almost have been designed to be beaten in gold. the excess of ornament—the outline of the letter is well-nigh lost in arabesque-may be taken -as indication of the lingering spirit of gothic art, by this time ultra-florid. it is only at the beginning of the period that the artists of the renaissance elaborated the simple roman form in this way. the admirable paint- ing alike of ornament and figure in certain illu- minated initials does not makethem by any means types of what initials should be. the choir books in the piccolomini library at siena are justly famous for the . majolica letter by rare beauty of their illu- godfrey sykes. mination. the pictures are perfect miniatures; but, framed in mon- strously big initials ( ) quite out of scale with the picture, they are miniatures misplaced. the art of design is in putting things in their places, and giving them their right value. the somewhat impractical idea of framing pictures within enclosing letters has never yet been satisfactorily carried out; but it appears to wood acdonssy coofrey sykes ad mdccclxiv vw rek sa sanotaan van aka xma as . alphabet by godfrey sykes. have haunted the designers of initials. most persistent attempts at picture-frame initials were made in by mathias gereon, who designed letters and pictures to be framed by them, which, as may be seen opposite ( ), were interchange- able, the same letter d serving as border to two separate pictures. the limits of these little picture blocks, to be inserted in larger blocks, are plainly pronounced by the square lines the pictures take. the expedient of designing letters which will frame any subject, and subjects which will fit any letter, promises economy, no doubt; but it does not fulfil all the conditions of composition : the letter has sometimes to be sacrificed to the picture. in the case of gereon's s, for instance, a most important section of the initial is eliminated to make room for it. in the series of which examples are here given the printer, indeed, appears to have felt that his initials did not speak for themselves, and has introduced accordingly a little explanatory letter that there might be no mistake about it ( ). a more practical, but at the same time quite commonplace, device is that of american printers, who use sometimes, by way of cheap initial, a border or frame of ornament within which movable capitals in large type can conveniently be adjusted; but this has not even the merit of novelty; plantin was guilty of it before them. the excessive elaboration of the forms of letters between the difficulty of inventing a form which shall be at once accepted for the familiar sign and have at the same time a character of its own, of designing, in fact, a new letter, and of devising more or less fitting ornament about an old one. . initial. p /c/e/e . wood-carving from the bedchamber of henri ii. at the louvre. xv. lettering and ornament. it is only natural to assume that lettering, conveying as it necessarily must a meaning, is introduced into ornament only on that account. the ornamentist, who has experience of its use in many an emergency of design, knows better. it has happened to him so often to find that lettering just met a want in design (lettering which but for reasons of composition it would never have occurred to him to introduce), that he does not for a moment doubt that, difficult as it may be to others to believe it, an appreciable amount of the lettering in ornament is addressed in the first l.o. place to the artistic sense, and only in the second to the understanding. it goes almost without saying, that lettering introduced for reasons of art must satisfy the mind, just as lettering introduced for purposes of explanation must at the same time flatter the eye. it is the business of the artist, having assured himself that lettering is what he wants in his design, to find a good excuse for it; and, with a little wit, he may alight on words so absolutely to the point, that it never occurs to those who have not penetrated the mysteries of the workshop to doubt that they were part of his original scheme, if not its starting-point. my own opinion, based upon personal practice, is, that many a time the modest lettering which takes a subsidiary but not unimportant place in design was, i will not say an afterthought, but a happy thought, which occurred to the artist in the course of developing his idea ; and that it was suggested quite as much by the feeling that it was wanted there for effect as by the thought that its meaning would give interest to the design. and this applies not merely to ornamental lettering. the very unlikeness of plain letters to the usual forms of ornament makes them exception- ally useful in design, as a foil and contrast to it. without obtruding themselves, they give point to pattern. it is a common experience in design to feel the need of intervals in one's ornament, places e- o ovo . ceiling of the salle de diane at fontainebleau. o of rest to the eye, too important to be treated as background, and in a sense prominent, but not calling for much enrichment. the cartouche, which plays such a prominent part in wood-carving of the period of henri ii., is an outcome of that need, affording as it does a broad surface of wood (not on the same plane with the ground, but itself another ground) which by its position demands decoration, and even decoration which, though it must not attract, shall not be insignificant. the design, in fact, leads up to such points in a way which would logically almost imply a figure com- position or some such enrichment; but artistically that would be too rich; what is wanted is some- thing simple, which will not disturb the breadth of surface. lettering, as may be seen ( , ), seems just to fill the place. it may be so sirnple in its lines and so flat in treatment that it barely disturbs the breadth of surface; and yet, when attention is attracted to it, as in such a position it must eventually be, the sense of fitness is not shocked by any inadequacy of detail. in the same way the cypher „ic ( ) just sufficiently fills a space which it is absolutely necessary to keep broad, and yet could not well be left bare. the fact, of course, that an artist could rely upon the vanity of his patron to appreciate the introduction of his cypher, did not make him the less ready to avail himself of the device. so with the scroll or label, ostensibly designed always to accommodate inscription, and actually shaped for its accommodation, we cannot doubt . english gothic paving tiles. that at times the inscription was first thought of only as an excuse for the ornamental label : it is even used at times without the excuse of lettering ( ). a case in point is the elaborate design of h. s. beham ( ). again, it would probably not have occurred to the designer to introduce the royal motto in connection with the cypher at the end of this chapter (the instinct of the designer is to make his cypher self-sufficient) had he not felt the need of the lines of the scroll to help him in the emergency of combining rather awkward letters. if, on the one hand, it can seldom be asserted positively that lettering is introduced for orna- ment's sake, neither, on the other, can we always be sure that the most absolutely appropriate lettering was introduced solely or primarily on account of what it tells us. it is just as likely that the letters on the old english encaustic tiles ( ) were thought of as appropriate filling for the spaces in the band, as that the band was . pew-ends from a church in somersetshire. the problem offered to the artist is, in the one case, to find words so appropriate, and, in the other, to reduce them so absolutely to ornament, that we neither know nor ask how the design came about, but are content that he has solved the problem, and, in so doing, given us a thing of beauty. it can hardly be said that the use of lettering in ornament, whether in the form of plain inscrip- tion, or of pattern built upon the alphabet, is sufficiently appreciated by modern designers. lettering recommends itself to the designer in that, when it comes to design and not mere inscription, he can do with it so nearly as he will. by nature it asserts itself somewhat; its lines, whatever the character, are inclined to distinguish themselves plainly enough from foliage or scroll- work, from animal or human form, with which they may be associated. but there are number- less ways of keeping it in its place, indeed in the precise subordination the artist may desire—ways of distributing the lettering, of shaping its outline, of treating its surface, of entangling it with orna- ment-any one or more of which may safely be followed. allusion has been made already to the breaking up of words capriciously, and to colouring the letters at will ( ). they may be made to alter- nate with ornament, as in the hispano-moresque plate opposite ( ), a very usual plan; or it may be not words but cyphers in themselves none too intelligible, which alternate with symbolic ornament. that occurs in the collar of the saint hdc . spanish earthenware dish painted in blue and lustre. esprit worked into the embroidered cloth of which a portion is here given ( ). the design of the collar is adapted also to the border of the cloth, where the larger scale of the design makes it more easy to appreciate how ingeniously the artist has combined his steady and even rigid cyphers with the dancing flames which figure again in the diaper on the field of the cloth. similar use is made of the cypher in a delightfully simple piece of actual goldsmith's work in the louvre, in which alternate links are formed of a cypher d e. the distribution of the separate letters of a word according to the artist's fancy is another cunning way of sufficiently removing it from bald announcement. there is no possible mistaking the meaning of the letters studding at precise intervals the velvet binding of queen mary's prayer-book ( ); and yet the word “regina ” does not shout at you. even straightforward lettering, following the plan, for example, of a greek fret in the french encaustic tile ( ), and making with the sudden patch in the centre most excellent ornament, would never thrust its meaning upon one, even were it upon examination readable, which, in this par- ticular instance, it can hardly claim to be; nor yet the inscription upon the english tile pattern ( ). if it was the intention of the artist to announce something in his design, the tidings reach but few ; if it was ornament he meant, there is no mistake about that. the disguise of lettering in the form of mono- grams and cyphers has been alluded to already. one looks upon the cyphers tooled upon le gascon's book cover ( ) less as lettering than as diaper. even the crowned l sprinkled over the bindings for louis xiii. asserts itself less emphatically than it would if it occurred singly, and were not used as an ornamental repeat. the form of lettering can, it is evident, be easily modified to the degree at which it is quite unin- vis: :blon anvra:lf bajuutal hamis:h:b] . old french paving tile. telligible; the main difficulty of the designer is in making ornamental letters which shall not be enigmatical. the foliation of the letter-shape is itself enough to transform it absolutely. but departure from the normal shape should be in the direction of beauty. that is hardly the case in the black letter which grows out into truncated tott . from the back of an old german wooden seat. branches in the words “ jesus” and “maria” ( , ), a rustic notion which crops up con- tinually in late german gothic, but it is never happy. it is seldom very desirable to break the surface of lettering with enrichment, unless indeed the idea is to merge it in ornament, to devise a mystery of richest scrollery out of which, as you dwell upon it, the words grow gradually into significance. van meckenen did that perfectly in the scroll- work which ( ), as at last it dawns upon you, spells his name. he designed also some very elaborate initials ( ), in which both the thickness of the letters and the background bellova e . from the back of an old german wooden seat. &疏忽索 ​sk . old painted roof decoration, norfolk. way it is executed. the ground of the building stone is cut away and broken flints are inlaid. but though the cement jointing makes a sort of outline le . wood-carving from an old scottish casket. between the black and the white, it is not con- tinuous; and where there is no background of aint it is left to the eye to make it good. the confusion of lettering with a background l.o. tes a rsm জীবন তোমার এ যা l s/ এ . alphabet in cutwork from an old sampler. be, to restore the balance of the composition. it will be seen ( ) that the hard effect of flat, sharp-cut letters may be greatly softened by a mere filigree of fine, close, evenly distributed ornament upon the ground, which by its very busy-ness dazzles the sight and so seems to blur their outlines. countless other ways of bringing lettering into focus in design will suggest themselves to the artist. it would be impossible to enumerate them all; and there is no need to do so; for they are devices not in the least degree peculiar to lettering, but in general use among artists for the purpose of subordinating one feature in ornament to another. indeed, very much of what is here said applies, not exclusively to lettering in orna- ment, but to the ornamental treatment of all manner of arbitrary forms. it is one of the difficulties besetting the discussion of any side issue of ornament, that it is practically impossible to refrain from wandering continually off into the broader question of design, taste, art in short- so true it is that art is one. in theory. in prac- tice the arts are many; and what is called general training in art is at most bare preparation for the pursuit of the least among them. hence the occasion, or at all events the excuse, for books dealing in detail, as this does, with quite a subsidiary branch of ornamental design. they will not teach the artist his trade, nor save him down v brad sa - . lettering with ornament to soften effect. page decorative value of let tering .. .. .. i, , , die-sunk letters .. .. directness .. .. .. distribution .. , , , , doors .. .. .. .. double column .. .. , outline .. .. drapery .. .. .. , dürer. .. .. .. , page illegibility .. .. .. illuminators .. , , independent ornament influence of technique on lettering .. .. .. initials , , , et seq. (ornamental) .. et seq. , (pictorial) et seq. inscriptions (monumen- tal) .. .. .. .. et seq. interlacing .. , , , , , , italics .. .. , , embroidery , , , exactness .. .. .. knife-cut letters .. feliciano .. .. .. .. figures .. .. .. , finish .. .. .. .. flourishes .. .. .. foliated letters .. , framing pictures with lettering .. .. .. , fretwork.. .. .. .. gereon (mathias) .. .. germans .. .. .. , godfrey (master) .... gothic characters , , , , , greek .. .. .. , greeks .. .. , , grounding-out , , , , gubbio plaques .... labels .. .. et seq., larisch (herr von) .. leather .. .. .. .. legibility , , , , , , , , , , le gascon .. .. .. le puy .. , , , lettering plus picture , , , liberties.. , , , light on dark.. .. , lombardic capitals .. , , london (victoria and al- bert museum) , , , hidden meanings o et seq. holbein .. .. , , horizontal bands.. .. line .. , manuscript .. , , margins .. .. , , mastic .. .. .. .. material (its influence on design) iii, , et seq. meckenen . , , page stone.. .. .. .. , sunken letters .. , surface breaking.. , , , sykes (godfrey) .. .. symbolism , , , symmetry.. , , , , page toledo .. .. .. tombstones ...... treatment .. , , turnover . . . . . , type .. i, , , , , variety .. ..... vases.. versal .. .. .. vertical lines .. visigothic crown .. in :::: .. tablets .. .. .. .. tapestry .. .. . , texture .. .. .. .. tint of ornament. . , , title page. .. .. .. wood.. .. .. .. , the end. bradbury, agnew, & co. ld., printers, london and tonbridge. a list of standard books on ornament & decoration, including furniture, wood-carving, metal work, design, &c., published and sold by b. t. batsford, , high holborn, london, w.c. the books in this list are marked at net cash discount prices, and will be forwarded carriage free on receipt of remittance. decorative flower studies for the use of artists, designers, students and others. a series of coloured plates, printed by hand by a stencil process in facsimile of the original drawings, accompanied by studies of detail drawn to show the development of the plant in successive stages, and descriptive notes. by j. foord. imperial to, handsomely bound in cloth gilt from a special design by the author. price . net. [just published. “these studies are no slight sketches devised for mere pictorial effect, but accurate and careful presentments of the growth of the subjects selected... . . the beauty and value of the growth of the sectional studies from the designer's point of view may be gathered at a glance."-home art work. “each plate is, in line and composition, a faithful and realistic study from nature, the rendering of the flowers being strictly true to their originals, while suggesting their adaptation to decorative treatment. .. miss foord excels in the drawing of flowers that grow in massed heads of small blossoms.”—the queen. "seldom, indeed, has one the good fortune to meet drawings so pleasing, and the various parts of the flowers are explained by accompanying drawings. miss foord is an artist with the pen as well as the pencil. :: the book is altogether admirable, and may be heartily recommended."--country life. “a truly valuable and beautiful book..... the coloured plates are nearly all good; they have a certain spaciousness of treatment that is full of delicacy and freedom ; and we have no doubt at all that the book, considered as a whole, is a real gain to all who take delight in the decorative representation of flowers.”—the studio. mr. lewis f. day, writing in the “ art journal” says :- ««• decorative flower studies' go very far indeed towards satisfying at once the decorator, designer, or student who wants trustworthy data upon which to found his work, and the lover of nature who delights to see deft and delicate rendering of the thing he knows. “ the author is duly regardful of the designer's wants, and supplements the coloured page by outline drawings of details likely to be of use to him. in these he will find flowers in various stages of growth, in bud, in full bloom, over-blown, and in seed; and often various views of these, as well as diagrams of the parts of the flower, and sections. the historic styles of ornament. containing , examples from all countries and all periods, exhibited on plates, mostly printed in gold and colours. with historical and descriptive text translated from the german of h. dolmetsch. folio, handsomely bound in cloth, gilt, price £ . net. this work has been designed to serve as a practical guide for the pur- pose of showing the development of ornament, and the application of colour to it in various countries through the epochs of history. a sketch book of artistic objects in pottery, glass, and metal work. by professor anton seder, director of the school of applied art, strassburg. with an introduction by lewis f. day. containing full-page plates, exhibiting upwards of novel designs for vases, beakers, jugs, teapots, lamps, candlesticks, electric light fittings, photograph and mirror frames, knives and forks, and ornamental ironwork, &c. large to, fancy paper covers, cloth back, price . net. “it is no slight recommendation of professor seder's work that he is at once fertile in invention and familiar with what has been done. in the sketches here collected he appears to be amusing himself by roughing out ideas for vessels and objects of all kinds, and they are all the more interesting in that they are but sketches, which he himself would very likely have considerably modified if he had carried them out. herein seems to me to be the value of these plates--in their suggestiveness.”—extract from introduction by lewis f. day. a reviewof modern decorative art in england and abroad. (“der moderne stil.”) containing examples of wall papers, textiles, lace, embroidery, bookbinding, pottery, carving, stained glass, metal work, &c., by walter crane, c. f. a. voysey, lewis f. day, william morris, selwyn image, e. grasset, heywood sumner, g. c. haité, and many other famous designers. selected from the art magazines of recent years, and arranged by j. hoffmann. to, boards, price s. net. a review of modern decorative art (“ der moderne stil”).—a second series of the above publica- tion, containing about further examples of the work of the leading english and continental designers. to, boards, price os. net. fust published. a review of modern decorative art. (“ der moderne stil.") third series. containing many hundreds of photographic illustrations of all branches of design and art industries, on full-page plates. to, boards. . net. this series comprises a great number of late designs, including french decoration and furniture from the paris exhibition. the collection is most varied as to its subjects, being especially important in regard to pottery and furniture, and is drawn from almost every country of europe. b. t. batsford, , high holborn, london. mr. lewis f. day's works—continueit. nature in ornament.— with full-page plates and illustrations in the text. third edition (fifth thousand). thick crown vo, in handsome cloth binding, richly gilt, price s. d. net ios. "amongst the best of our few good ornamental designers is mr. lewis f. day, who is the author of several books on ornamental art. 'nature in ornament' is the latest of these, and is probably the best. the treatise should be in the hands of every student of orna- mental design. it is profusely and admirably illustrated, and well printed."- magazine of art. “a book more beautiful for its illustrations, or one more helpful to students of art, can hardly be imagined."-queen. windows.—a book about stained and painted glass. containing pages, including full-page plates, and upwards of illustrations in the text, all of old examples. large vo, cloth gilt, price s. net. decorative brushwork and design – ele- mentary stage. a manual for the use of art students and others. by henry cadness, master of of design in the municipal school of art, manchester. synopsis of chapters: materials -- preparatory work — methods of expression--forms of ornament-nature- influences of styles-application of study, &c., &c. with upwards of examples of design on plates. crown vo. [ready shortly. professor meyer's text-boor's. a handbook of ornament.-— with plates, contain- ing about , illustrations of the elements and application of decoration to objects. by f. s. meyer, professor at the school of applied art, karlsruhe. third english edition, revised by hugh stannus, lecturer on applied art at the royal college of art, south kensington. thick vo, cloth gilt, gilt top, price i s. d. net. os. "a library, a museum, an encyclopædia and an art school in one. to rival it as a book of reference, one must fill a bookcase. the quality of the drawings is unusually high, the choice of examples is singularly good. .. the work is practically an epitome of a hundred works on design."-studio. “the author's acquaintance with ornament anazes, and his three thousand subjects are gleaned from the finest which the world affords. as a treasury of ornament drawn to scale in all styles, and derived from genuine concrete objects, we have nothing in england which will not appear as poverty-stricken as compared with professor meyer's book."- architect. handbook of art smithing.-- for the use of practical smiths, designers and others, and in art and tech- nical schools. by f. s. meyer, author of “a handbook of ornament.” translated from the second german edition. with an introduction by j. starkie gardner. containing illustrations. demy vo, cloth, price s. net . b. t. batsford, , high holborn, london, the furniture of our forefathers. by esther singleton. with critical descriptions of plates by russell sturgis. being examples of old english, french, and dutch furniture, taken out by the early colonists to new england and also of pieces manufactured by them. containing about plates, reproduced by photogravure, in half-tone, and illustrations from drawings. to be completed in eight parts, not sold separately, of which four are just issued, the remainder shortly. priče to sub- scribers only s. net each part. (illustrated prospectus on application. hepplewhite's cabinet - maker and uphol- sterer's guide ; or, repository of designs for every article of household furniture in the newest and most approved taste. a complete facsimile reproduction of this rare work, containing nearly charming designs on plates. small folio, bound in speckled cloth, gilt, old style, price £ ios. net. ( .) original copies when met with fetch from £ to £ . chippendale's the gentleman and cabinet- maker's director.-a complete facsimile of the rd and rarest edition, containing plates of designs of chairs, sofas, beds and couches, tables, library book cases, clock cases, stove grates, &c., &c. folio, strongly bound in half-cloth, price £ . net. ( .) examples of old furniture, english and foreign. drawn and described by alfred ernest chancellor. containing photo-lithographic plates exhibiting some examples of elizabethan, stuart, queen anne, georgian and chippendale furniture; and an interesting variety of conti- nental work. with historical and descriptive notes. large to, gilt, price £ . net £i is. the decorative work of robert and james adam. being a reproduction of all the plates illustrating decoration and furniture from their “works in archi- tecture,” published – . containing large folio plates (size, inches by inches), giving about examples of rooms, ceilings. chimney - pieces, tables, chairs, vases, lamps, mirrors, pier-glasses, clocks, &c., &c., by these famous eighteenth-century designers. large folio, handsomely bound in old style, price s. net. [just published. this volume contains every plate of decorative value from the com- plete work, which now fetches £ , and therefore forms a complete key to the graceful style for which the brothers adam are so universally renowned. the decoration of houses. by edith wharton and ogden codman, architect. pages of text, with full-page photographic plates of views of rooms, doors, ceilings, fireplaces, various pieces of furniture, &c., from the renaissance period. second edition, revised. large square vo, cloth gilt, price s. d. net. this volume, written by an american lady artist, and an architect, describes and illustrates in a very interesting way the decorative treat- ment of rooms during the renaissance period, and deduces principles for the decoration, furnishing, and arrangements of modern houses. old clocks and watches and their makers. being an account of the history of clocks and watches, their mechanism and ornamentation, with a list of , old makers. by f. j. britten. containing over illustrations, many reproduced from photographs, of choice and curious examples of old clocks and watches. pages. demy vo, cloth, gilt, price os. net. “mr. britten, the best living authority on clocks and watches, has given us a book altogether admirable. every kind of watch and clock is here dealt with historically and completely."- the artist. furniture designing and draughting. being notes on the elementary forms, methods of construction, and dimensions of common articles of furniture. by a. c. nye. fully illustrated by diagrams, many of them being full-page. large vo, cloth, os. net. a practical manual on the preparation of working drawings of furni- ture, prepared from material collected during an experience of some years as a designer of furniture for several of the most important furniture makers in new york. remains of ecclesiastical wood - work.-a series of examples of stalls, screens, book-boards, roofs, pulpits, &c., containing beautifully engraved plates, from drawings by t. talbot bury, archt. to, half-bound, price os. . net s. d. details of gothic wood carving.–being a series of drawings from original work of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. by franklyn a. crallan. contain- ing large photo-lithographic plates, illustrating some of the finest specimens of gothic carving extant. with intro- ductory and descriptive text. large to, in cloth portfolio, or bound in cloth gilt, price s. net . b. t. batsford, , high holborn, london. published with the sanction of the science and art department. french wood carvings from the national museums.-a series of examples printed in collotype from photographs specially taken from the carvings direct. edited by eleanor rowe. part i. : late th and early th century examples ; part ii. : th century work ; part iii. : th and th centuries. the three series com- plete, each containing large folio plates, with descriptive letterpress. folio, in portfolios, price . each net; or handsomely bound in one volume, £ . net. “students of the art of wood carving will find a mine of inexhaustible treasures in this series of illustrations of french wood carvings. . . . each plate is a work of art in itself; the distribution of light and shade is admirably managed, and the differences in relief are faithfully indicated, while every detail is reproduced with a clearness that will prove in. valuable to the student. sections are given with several of the plates.”—the queen. “needs only to be seen to be purchased by all interested in the craft, whether archæo- logically or practically."-— the studio. hints on wood carving for beginners.—by eleanor rowe. fourth edition, revised and enlarged. illustrated. vo, sewed, price is. in paper covers. “the most useful and practical small book on wood-carving we know of.” -- builder. “is a useful little book, full of sound directions and good suggestions.”- magazine of art. hints on chip carving.—(class teaching and other northern styles.) by eleanor rowe. illustrations. svo, sewed, price is. in paper covers, or in cloth, price is. d. “a capital manual of instruction in a craft that ought to be most popular.” saturday review. progressive studies and designs for wood). carvers.. by miss e. r. plowden. with a preface by miss rowe. consisting of five large folding sheets of illustrations (drawn full size), of a variety of objects suitable for wood carving. with descriptive text. second edition, enlarged. to, in portfolio, price s. net. ancient wood and ironwork in cambridge. -by w. b. redfarn, the letterpress by john willis clark. folio lithographed plates drawn to a good scale. cloth gilt, a handsome volume, price os. d. net s. d. leadwork-old and ornamental.- by w. r. lethaby, director of the london county council's school of arts and crafts. with illustrations of leaded spires and turrets, fonts, statues, vases, finials, pipe-heads, lead glazing, &c., &c. vo, cloth, price s. (published at . d. net). an interesting and charmingly illustrated volume upon a subject about which practically nothing has hitherto been written. only a small number of copies remain for sale at the reduced price. a facsimile reproduction of one of the rarest and most remarkable books of designs ever published in england. a new booke of drawings of ironworke.- invented and desined by john tijou. containing severall sortes of iron worke, as gates, frontispieces, balconies, staircases, pannells, &c., of which the most part hath been wrought at the royall building of hampton court, &c. all for the use of them that worke iron in per- fection and with art. (sold by the author in london, .) containing folio plates. with introductory note and descriptions of the plates by j. starkie gardner. folio, bound in boards, old style, price s. net. only copies were printed for england, and very few now remain. an original copy is priced at £ by mr. quaritch, the renowned bookseller. decorative wrought ironwork of the th and th centuries.-by d. j. ebbetts. con- taining large lithographic plates, illustrating english examples of screens, grilles, panels, balustrades, &c. folio, boards, cloth back, price . d. net ros. an illustrated dictionary of words used in art and archÆology. by j. w. mollett, b.a. giving concise descriptions of the chief terms used in decorative art and architecture, with derivations. illus- trated by over woodcuts of objects of art, &c. large square vo, price . (published at .). costume of all nations - ancient and modern. by f. hottenroth. (le costume chez les peuples.) containing full-page coloured plates, and over other illustrations in the descriptive text (in french). large vo, fancy boards. . net. an interesting and comprehensive handbook on costume. pen drawing: an illustrated treatise. by charles d. maginnis. with illustrations, including reproduc- tions of the work of the principal black-and-white artists. vo, linen, price s. d. net. contents :—i. style in. pen drawing. . materials. . technique. . values. . practical problems. . archi- tectural drawing. . decorative drawing. b. t. batsford, , high holborn, london. ii plastering—plain and decorative. a practical treatise on the art and craft of plastering and modelling. including full descriptions of the various tools, processes, &c., employed. with over full-page plates, and about other illustrations. by william millar. with an introduction, treating of the history of the art, by g. t. robinson, f.s.a. thick to, cloth, containing pages of text, price s. net. examples of english mediÆval foliage and coloured decoration. — by jas. k. colling, architect, f.r.i.b.a. taken from buildings of the xiith to the xvth century. containing lithographic plates, and woodcut illustrations, with text. royal to, cloth, gilt top, price . net (published at £ s.). dedicated by special permission to sir edward ). poynter, p.r.a. examples of greek and pompeian decora- tive work. measured and drawn by j. cromar watt. containing collotype plates, reproduced from the original pencil drawings of the author, comprising architectural details, and ornament, terra cotta, and ornamental bronze work, &c. a handsome folio volume, cloth, price £ os. net. early renaissance architecture in england). an historical and descriptive account of the development of english architecture during the tudor, elizabethan and jacobean periods, - . by j. alfred gotch, f.s.a., author of “the architecture of the renaissance in england,” &c. with collotype and other plates and illustra- tions in the text from drawings by various accomplished draughtsmen, and from photographs specially taken royal vo, cloth, s. net. [ just published. ** this work is quite independent and distinct, both in plan and illustrations, from the author's larger work, and is in no sense a reduced or cheaper edition of it. the orders of architecture: greek, roman and italian.—edited with notes by r. phenÉ spiers, f.s.a., f.r.i.b.a. fourth edition, revised and enlarged, containing plates, several new to this edition. to, cloth, price ros. d. net s. d. “a most useful work. ... mr. spiers has done excellent service in editing this work, and his notes on the plates are very appropriate and useful.”— british architect... ornamental details of the italian renais- sance. a series of full-page plates of measured draw- ings of pilasters, panels, friezes, capitals, and other details, with some inlaid work; also a variety of choice ironwork, selected from rome, milan, padua, bologna, &c. by g. a. t. middleton, a.r.i.b.a., and r. w. carden, a.r.i.b.a. small folio, cloth, price . net. voer o note the pennsylvania state university library atet nnsy viver te pen liso qisal. the arts library od : காலை text books of ornamental design. by lewis f. day. nature in ornament. text books of ornamental design by lewis f. day. price three-and-sixpence each, bound in cloth. introductory volume. some principles of every-day art. second edition, revised, with further illustrations. with numerous illustrations in the text. the anatomy of pattern. third edition. with thirty-five full page illustrations. the planning of ornament. third edition. with thirty-eight full page illustrations. the application of ornament. second edition. with forty-two full page illustrations. the three text books, bound in one volume, cloth gilt, price ten and sixpence. plate . sen ca j akerman, photo lith london, fleur-de-luce text books of ornamental design. nature in ornament. by lewis f. day, author of “every-day art.' with plates and illustrations in the text. second edition, third thousand. london: b. t. batsford, high holborn. . p + . . d preface. . : the scope of my subject explains, and justifies i hope, a volume exceeding in bulk the three former text-books of this series rolled into one. that scope is perhaps sufficiently expressed in the words “nature in ornament.” it may, however, be as well to say here that my aim has been, not so much to show the obvious adaptability of plant form to the purpose of ornament (which has been done already, more than once, and more or less adequately), as to demonstrate the natural development of ornament from nature, to show its constant relation to natural form, and to deduce from the practice of past-masters of the craft of design something like principles, which may put the student in the way of turning nature to account in ornament of his own. lewis f. day. , mecklenburg square, london, september th, . note to the second edition. little alteration beyond verbal correction has been made in this edition; but some few illustrations, which in the first came out unsatisfactorily, have been drawn anew. l. f. d. note. i have to thank my friend mr. walter crane for my frontispiece, mr. william morris for plate , and mr. heywood sumner for plate and illus- tration . i am further indebted to various gentle- men for permission to reproduce designs belonging to them; to the proprietors of the 'art journal for plate ; to mr. alfred carpenter for plate ; to messrs. erskine beveridge & co. for illustra- tion iii; to mr. edmund evans for illustration ; to messrs. heaton, butler, & bayne and the editor of the journal of decorative art' for, illustration ; to messrs. jeffrey & co. for plates , , , , , , and illustrations , , ; to messrs. maw Ô co. for plates and ; to messrs. turnbull & stockdale for plates , , and ; and to mr. john wilson for plate and illustrations and . l. f. d. table of contents. page : .- introductory .. .. .. .. .. .. .. i ii.-ornament in nature .. .. .. .. .. iii.-nature in ornament .. .. iv.-the simplification of natural forms v.—the elaboration of natural forms .. vi.-consistency in the modification of nature .. .. .. .. .. ... vii.- parallel renderings .. .. .. .. .. viii.—more parallels .. .. .. .. ... · ix.-tradition in design ... x.-treatment .. .. .. .. .. .. .. xi.-animals in ornament . .... .. xii.—the element of the grotesque xiii.-still life in ornament .. .. .. xiv.-symbolic ornament .. .. .. .. .. : : : : : : : list of plates. i. fleur de luce--treatment of the iris by walter crane. . japanese roses--from various japanese printed books. . budding branchies-drawn from nature. . natural leaf-sheaths—from a japanese botany book. . various berries-drawn from nature. . some seed-vessels—from a japanese botany book. . pods—drawn from nature. . flower and leaf buds-drawn from nature. . oak and oak galls—tile panel, l.f.d. . natural growth-from a japanese botany book. ii. greek scrolls. . roman scrolls. . acanthus sculpture and brush-work-illustra- tive diagram. . two versions of the same frieze design, l.f.d. tj. details of roman mosaic—from carthage, b.m. . transitional scroll-german, by d. hopfer. . painted wall panel—from the palazzo det-t, hy giulio romano. list of plates. . lustre dishes—of the sixteenth century-s.k.m. . german gothic scroll—from tapestry in the museum at nuremberg. . arab-esque renaissance ornament-german. . ornamental bouquet—of the seventeenth century- design for goldsmith's work. . book-cover—designed by owen jones. . sunflowers and roses-wall-paper by b. j. talbert. . details of greek terra-cotta—from vases at naples and at the b.m. . details of ancient coptic embroideries-s.k.m. . detail from an indian kinkaub-modern tradi- tional design. . details from pompeii--wall painting and mosaic. . carved cabinet door—from cairo,s.k.m. . english gothic details—from various sources. . indian renderings of the iris—painting and damascening. . inlaid flower-panels—l.f.d. . lyons silk-weaving of the seventeenth or - eighteenth century-dresden museum. . details of eighteenth century foliage-from old english silks. . silk damask of the sixteenth century-italian. . old lace-ivory point, munich museum. . details of hammered work-german gothic. . wall-paper-—conventional growth—l.f.d. . wall-paper founded upon nature-l.f.d. list of plates. xi . tile panel based on the lily-l.f.d. . chrysanthemum pattern-comparatively natural- l.f.d. . archaic greek foliage—from a bronze cup-b.m. . modern gothic lily panel-b. j. talbert. . lily ornament—italian inlay, siena. . eighteenth century flower renderings-from old english silks. . a renaissance medley-s. croce, florence. . pea-pod ornament—pilaster by brunellesco. . dutch and german conventions—of the seven- teenth century. . scroll and foliage-l.f.d. . ancient coptic embroidery-s.k.m. . vine and olive panel-lateran museum, rome. . italian gothic vine—from giotto's tower, florence. . vine and apple-tree frieze-l.f.d. . classic renderings of the vine-b.m. . arab vine panel-showing one-half of the design. . vine sculpture-lateran museum. . stencilled vine decoration-heywood sumner. . coptic vine ornament—from ancient embroideries- s.k.m. . english gothic vine-stall-end, from christchurch priory. . vine in stained glass-l.f.d. . vine by dÜrer—from a woodcut. . conventional vine-leaf pattern-l.f.d. хіі list of plates. . artificial renderings of the rose—from english silks of the eighteenth century. . tudor rose—from the bronze doors to henry vii.'s chapel. . tudor rose—from a stall-arm, henry vii.'s chapel. . italian version of a persian carpet--rose and tulip-s.k.m. . marble inlay—from the taj mahal, india. . indian lotus panel-stone-carving, from the buddhist tope at amarivati. . details of buddhist stone-carving-lotus flowers, &c., from amarivati. . the pink—various renderings of the flower. . eighteenth century versions of the pink- english. . poppy by ghiberti—from the bronze doors of the baptistery at florence. . poppy pattern-wall-paper, l.f.d. . pomegranates—chinese colour-printing and german incising. . gothic oak ornament~after pugin. . comparatively natural lily panel-l.f.d. . orchid and fungus pattern-old chinese em- broidery. . conventional tree work--indian stone carving. . persian foliage-silk-weaving of the sixteenth cen- tury, lyons museum. . details of egyptian sculpture-b.m. o. details of ninevite sculpture-b.m. list of plates. xiii . details of greek vase-painting-b.m. . roman sculpture--lemon and apple trees--lateran museum. . sixteenth century german design-peter quentel. . late gothic “pine” ornaments—from various textiles. . conventional tulip frieze-l.f.d. . peony frieze—by w. j. muckley. . fruit pattern-wall-paper by wm. morris. . chinese lotus-porcelain painting. . cobea scandens—linen damask—l.f.d. . conventional dandelion-l.f.d. . german gothic thistle-scroll - wood-carving, s.k.m. . japanese cranes—from a printed book. . japanese tortoises—from a printed book. . peruvian eccentricities—from fragments of stuffs. . . sicilian silk patterns-of about the thirteenth century. . sixteenth century wood-carving - s. pietro, perugia. . conventional butterflies—chinese and japanese. . modern german renaissance-by anton seder. . seventeenth century scroll-work-from a book of designs, published , by s. gribelin. . sixteenth century arabesque—italian. . late gothic illumination — the annunciation. xiv list of plates. . lustre plaques—l.f.d. . studies in ornamental figure-work-by holbein. . grotesque panel-by sansovino. . grotesque figure—by marco dente da ravenna. . grotesque scroll-cretonne, l.f.d. . keltic interlaced ornament—from a ms. in the b.m. . conventional wing forms — sixteenth century italian carving. . diapers with a meaning—japanese. iio. early greek wave and lotus diaper—twelfth or thirteenth century b.c. iii. seaweed borders-l.f.d. . seaweed pattern-l.f.d. . peacock-feather pattern-japanese. . peacock-feather diapers—from various sources. . peacock-feather pattern—turkish embroidery. . rococo scroll-work-by philippo passarini. . seventeenth century scroll-work — german, by nicolaus drusse. . pompeian wall painting. . indian naja-stone-carving from the amarivati tope. . conventional trees-- from various sources. . late gothic fleur-de-lis tracery—from wood. carvings at s.k.m. . marguerite panels-wood-carving. . symbolic ornament-book-cover-l.f.d. list of illustrations in the text. page : . various tendrils .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . vine tendrils .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . romanesque ornamentation of the stem-ely .. . part of a pompeian candelabrum--b.m. .. .. . renaissance use of pea-pods (prato cathedral) . . unequally divided oak-leaf .. .. .. .. . chinese rendering of wistaria-old embroidery .. . acanthus leaves reduced to brush-work .. .. . simple acanthus leafage .. .. .. .. .. .. . step between wave and acanthus scroll-roman mosaic, b.m. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . olive-like leafage .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . oak-like leafage .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . vine-like acanthus leafage, from the jubé limoges .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . crocket-like foliage, from limoges . . . modern modification of classic leafage .. .. . seventeenth century scroll—boulle .. .. .. . details of romanesque ornament .. .. .. .. . details of early gothic ornament-stained glass .. : : : : : : xvi list of illustrations in the text. page . spiral persian scroll .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . iris-like details of persian ornament-sixteenth and seventeenth centuries .. .. .. .. .. .. . details of early persian ornament-tenth to twelfth century .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . sixteenth century arabesque details—german .. . rosette in rouen faïence .. .. .. .. .. .. . chinese foliage, not easy to identify .. .. . . bouquet of conventional ornament-persian porce- lain, s.k.m. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . abstract ornament, not free from foliation . conventional chinese flower forms .. .. .. .. . conventional chinese foliage .. .. .. .. .. . rectangular acorn patterns-old german .. .. . simplified thistle—by the late g. e. street, r.a. . gothic leaf border, wood-carving—maidstone .. . rosette or rose ?-german gothic .. .. .. .. . gothic leaf-and-flower border-wood-carving . seed-vessels from nature .. .. .. .. .. .. . conventional buds, or seed-vessels ?-marble inlay, florence .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . conventional greek ivy leaves and berries ..... . japanese border, buds or fruits ? .. .. .. .. . conventional tree-from a sicilian silk .. .. .. . simple roman tree-mosaic, b.m. .. .. . hawthorn crocket .. .. .. .. .. . vine crocket .. .. .. .. .. ... . late gothic pomegranate-stencil pattern - . indian renderings of the poppy-niello : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : list of illustrations in the text. xvii page . greek border with lily buds .. .. .. .. .. . early gothic foliated ornament-pavement tiles .. . natural and ornamental foliage-early french .. . bud-like ornamental forms-gothic wood-carving .. . peony simplified to form a stencil—by h. sumner . indian wood-carving .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . gothic wood-carving .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . greek that might be gothic-stone-carving .. .. . persian details which might be gothic-porcelain of the sixteenth or seventeenth century .. .. .. . japanese treatment of the iris-embroidery .. .. . wheat-ears, simplified or elaborated ?-seventeenth century italian silk .. .. .. .. .. .. . . floral forms within floral forms—italian velvet, persian design .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . pomegranate berries arranged in bud-form-per- sian silk .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . ornamental pomegranates—italian velvet .. .. . ornamental pomegranate-eighteenth century silk . ornamental pomegranate-old german embroi- dery .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . foliated forms geometrically diapered-japanese .. . elaborated flower—from an embroidered gothic altar frontal .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . elaborated flower—from a table-cover of german embroidery, .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . bulbous hop-leaves--german gothic wood-carving . indian corn adapted to ornament-italian wood- carving .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. xviii list of illustrations in the text. page . rigid lines of the growth of corn turned to orna. mental account-by the late c. heaton .. .. . artificial grace of line-italian .. .. .. .. . quasi-natural rendering of the lily—by sammicheli . quattro-cento lily-s. bernardino, perugia .. .. . narcissus compelled into the way of ornament- l.f.d. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . incongruous treatment of the oak-roman .. .. . characterless design-albertolli .. .. . . . inconsistency between flower and leaf-japanese . graceful artificiality-lyons silk, about .. . de-naturalised floral details—by gribelin, ... . confusion of effect without confusion of growth, persian tiles, s.k.m. .. .. .. .. .. .. . the vine in assyrian sculpture-b.m. .. .. .. . vine from a greek vase—b.m. .. .. .. .. . pompeian vine border-silver on bronze_naples . italian wood-carving—hop or vine ?–s.k.m. ... . conventional gothic vine and grapes—york .. iii . gothic vine with mulberry-like grape-bunches- york .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . conventional vine, from toledo — more or less moorish .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . moorish vine, from toledo . .. ... .. . naïve byzantine vine-ravenna .. .. .. .. . early french gothic vine-notre dame, paris .. . square-shaped vine-leaves — scratched earthen- ware, b.m. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . diamond-shaped vine-leaves —gothic .. .. .. iio * list of illustrations in the text. xix page . vesica-shaped vine-leaves – york .. .. .. .. . diagram of italian gothic treatment–padua .. . transitional vine scroll—german linen damask .. " . italian quattro-cento vine scroll—venice .. .. . german renaissance foliage—by aldegrever .. . vine in gothic glass-painting-malvern . . . quasi-persian rose — italian velvet, sixteenth century.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . oriental rose border—embroidered in silk and gold on linen .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . rhodian rose--from a faïence dish .. .. .. . roman lily forms—a candelabrum . .. .. . indian lotus—buddhist stone-carving, b.m. . . seventeenth century iris--appliqué embroidery, italian, s.k.m. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . renaissance pinks-needlework .. .. .. .. . modern gothic pomegranate—by the late b. j. talbert.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . pomegranate—spanish brocatelle.. .. .. .. . oak-from the cathedral of toledo . .. .. . assyrian tree of life .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . oak—from a sicilian silk .. .. .. .. .. . romanesque tree of life—from a painted roof at hildesheim .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . renaissance silk-showing persian influence . . egyptian symbolic papyrus . . . . . . assyrian symbolic ornament-glazed earthenware, b.m. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. iii. abstract greek ornament—from a vase .. .. xx list of illustrations in the text. page . later greek ornament-from a vase .. .. .. . assyrian rosette of lotus flowers and buds .. .. . gothic ornament—from notre dame, paris .. . fifteenth century fir-cone ornaments .. .. .. . chinese flower forms .. .. .. .. .. .. . etruscan and greek anthemion shapes .. .. . japanese diaper .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . japanese diaper .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . lily-like greek details—from various sources .. . romanesque detail approaching to the fleur-de-lis . gothic pattern-early fleur-de-lis .. .. .. бо . concentric forms-seaweed .. .. .. .. .. . gothic-anthemion shape—from the nimbus of a figure in one of the stained-glass windows at fairford .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . gothic diaper-radiating-from a painted screen . . ^ » renaissance ornament-italian wood-carving .. . renaissance anthemion-by mino da fiesole, florence .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . abstract foliage-persian inlay, s.k.m. .. .. . would-be ornamental celandine - albertolli .. . chinese rendering of “kiss-me-quick” – em- broidery .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . comparatively natural treatment of poppy- l.f.d. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . comparatively natural treatment of fig—l.f.d... . ornamental treatment of strawberry-l.f.d. ... . dolphins used as ornament-by george fox .. list of illustrations in the text. xxi page . circular bird (and flower) crest .. .. .. .. . circular bird crest ar bird crest .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . ornamental indication of birds in flight . diaper of storks and chrysanthemum flowers combined .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . dragon-fly diaper-japanese .. .. .. .. . diaper of conventional bats .. .. .. .. .. . bird diaper by the late wm. burgess, a.r.a. .. . repeating figure pattern .. .. .. .. .. .. . conventional peacock border-indian embroidery . egyptian wing treatment—vultures . .. .. . egyptian wing treatment—hawk in cloisonné enamel .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . bat diaper-old japanese .. .. .. .. . . embroidered bat—chinese .. .. .. .. .. . pilaster by signorelli- orvieto .. .. .. .. . grotesque iron grille—german .. .. .. .. . wings reduced to ornament—italian wood-carving . ornamental dragon-japanese .. .. .. .. . arctic american grotesquerie-embroidered cloth . spring blossoms on the stream-j.ipanese: .. .. . diaper of spiders' webs .. .. .. .. .. .. . diaper of flames . .. . cloud and bat pattern .. .. .. .. .. .. . cloud pattern .. .. .. . wave pattern .. .. .. . water and water-lilies .. .. .. .. .. .. . wave pattern and water-fowl . .. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : xxii list of illustrations in the text. page : : . wave pattern-japanese porcelain .. . wave pattern-japanese lacquer .. .. . wave ornament .. .. .. .. .. .. ... . wave ornament .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . wave and spray pattern.. ... ... .. . ... . decorative rendering of incoming wave-japanese . shell ornament.. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. . seaweed ornament .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . heraldic mantling-part of a painted frieze- l.f.d. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . heraldic mantling – german gothic wood. carving .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . inlaid peacock-feather ornament-by b. j. talbert . coptic feather border-s.k.m. .. .. .. .. . coptic feather diaper-s.k.m. .. .. .. .. . persian peacock feather pattern-painted tiles, s.k.m. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . trophy panel-renaissance .. .. .. .. .. . françois ier skull ornament-wood-carving, fon- tainebleau .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . early phænician wreath .. .. .. .. .. . swag of fruit-bunches .. .. .. .. .. .. . egyptian sacred beetle .. .. .. .. .. .. . diaper of waves, clouds, and sacred birds .. .. . cross of fleurs-de-lis—thirteenth century .. .. . assyrian sacred tree .. .. .. .. .. .. . assyrian sacred tree-b.c. - . .... . iris or fleur-de-lis ?-seventeenth century vene- tian velvet .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. < list of illustrations in the text. xxiii bols . . .. page . egyptian symbols .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . gothic fleurs-de-lis—from old glass, lincoln . . heraldic badges-sixteenth century, mantua ... . symbolic eye-egyptian .. .. .. .. .. . segment of greek border of eyes-painted terra- cotta .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . symbolic burder of seed-vessels-l.f.d. .. .. . heraldic oak-italian renaissance .. .. .. abbreviations. b.m.-british museum. s.k.m.-south kensington museum. l.f.d.-lewis f. day. nature in ornament. i. introductory. the bias of the natural man is not un- naturally in the direction of nature. almost alone in the history of art, the greeks and the moors appear to have been content with ornament which was ornament pure and simple. it is not too much to say, even in these days of supposed interest in things deco- rative, that the englishman generally speaking neither knows nor cares anything about the subject. he is in most cases absolutely out of sympathy with it. possibly he has even a sort of contempt for the “ornamental,” as some- thing opposed to that utility which he so highly esteems-never so much as appre- hending the fact that ornamental art is art applied to some useful purpose. the forms of ornament he most admires are those most nearly resembling something nature in ornament. in nature, and it is because of that resemblance he admires them : abstract ornament is quite outside his sympathies and beyond his under- standing. he begins, for example, to take a feeble interest in greek pattern-work only when he sees in it a likeness to the honey- suckle. show him some purely ornamental form, and it is neither its beauty, nor its character, nor its fitness that strikes him; he is perplexed only to know what it is meant to represent. to him every form of orna- ment must have its definite relation to some natural object, and therein lies all its interest. relation to nature there must be indeed, and every one will acknowledge the interest with which we trace such relationship; but no one who really cares for ornament at all will allow that it depends upon that for its charm. " when ornament has gone astray, it has been more often in the direction of what i may call rusticity than of that artificiality which is at the other end of the scale. art passes through periods of affectation, when it becomes before all things urgent that opinion should be led back again to the for- gotten, grass-grown paths of nature. that is not our urgency just now. if there was at one time within our memory some fear of artificiality in art, the danger now lies in the introductory. opposite direction of literalism ; a literalism which assumes a copy of nature to be not only art, but the highest form of art; which ignores, if it does not in so many words deny, the necessity of anything like imagination or invention on the part of the artist, and accepts the imitative faculty for all in all. to venture upon the sweeping assertion that all art whatsoever is, and must be, con- ventional, would be very likely to lay oneself open to the rebuke of judging all art by the decorative standard ; but with regard to orna- ment, i have no hesitation in saying that more or less conventional it must be, or it would not be ornamental. not, of course, that the ornamentist denies in the least the supreme beauty of natural form and colour, or thinks for a moment to improve upon it, as some seem to imagine, who insinu- ate that he proposes to surpass nature, pre- sumes to “paint the lily,” and so on. on the contrary, he is modest enough to recognise the impossibility of even approximately copying anything without the sacrifice of something which is more immediately to his purpose than any fact of nature—consistency namely, fitness, breadth, repose ; and is content, there- fore, to take only so much of natural beauty as he can turn to use. he regulates his b nature in ornament. appetite, that is to say, according to his digestion. such self-denial on his part is not by any means a shirking of the difficulties of the situa- tion. in art nothing is easy, except to such as have a natural faculty that way. it is not every one who finds it easy to make a striking study from nature; but that comparatively elementary accomplishment does demand ability of a lesser kind than the production of a picture in which there is design, unity, style, and whatever else may distinguish a master- work of the renaissance from a study of to-day. in like manner, the mere painting or carving of a sprig of foliage is within the reach of every amateur ; but to adapt such foliage to a given position and purpose, to design it into its place, to treat it after the manner of wood, stone, glass, metal, textile fabric, earthenware, or what not, demands not only intelligence and inborn aptitude, but training and experience too. it is the easiest thing in the world to ridicule such decorative treatment; but it would puzzle the scoffer if he were asked to pause a moment in his merriment and point out a single instance of even moderately satisfactory de- coration in which a more or less non-natural introductory. treatment has not been adopted. the fact is, the artist has not yet arrived at a point where he is able to dispense altogether with art. it is his misfortune (more so nowadays than ever it was) that it is extremely difficult for him to make up his mind precisely as to the relation of art to nature. that it is dependent upon nature, more or less, is obvious. only by way of paradox is it possible to contend, like mr. whistler, that “nature is very seldom right.” nature is our one and constant model. the question is as to how freely or how painfully, how broadly or how literally, how individually or how slavishly, we shall render the model before us, how much of it, and what of it, we shall depict. and this is a question which, if not quite beyond solution, must be solved by each man according to his idiosyncrasy, and that only after much anxiety and doubt and difficult self-questioning. it is the good fortune of the decorator, the ornamentist, the worker in any of the more dependent arts, to be comparatively free from such incubus of doubt. in his art there is much less room for hesitation. for him to adopt the realistic creed would be to deny his calling, and to cut himself off from the art of his adoption : for the very idea of nature in ornament. ornament implies something to be ornamented, and accordingly to be taken into account. by the adoption of any one of the applied arts, a man is bound to draw the line at realism so soon as ever it is opposed to the application of his art. in other words, the purpose to which his art is put indicates to him the limits of possible realism. and so, while the dispute about realism is still at its height so far as literature, the drama, and even painting are concerned, the question as to the adaptation of natural forms to ornamental design has resolved itself, for all who know anything of the subject, into inquiry as to the degree and kind of modification calculated to render natural forms applicable to orna- ment and the various purposes to which it is put. this modification of natural form to orna- mental purpose we are accustomed to call conventional. in accepting this term, how- ever, we must be careful to distinguish con- vention from convention, and especially from that academic acceptation of the term which would give us to understand that the modi- fication of nature has been done for us, and that we have only to accept the classic, mediæval, renaissance, or other more or less obsolete rendering at hand. as though the introductory. tombs of buried peoples were heaven-sent habitations for live men ! the one thing to be insisted upon in refer- ence to convention is that it has not been done for us once and for all, that we have to do our own conventionalising; and not only that, but that we have to do it again and again, each time afresh, according to the work in hand. it is only by this means that art in ornament subsists and grows: when it ceases to grow, decay sets in of course. to accept a convention ready-made is to compromise your own invention; to go on copying the accepted types, be they never so beautiful, is just to stifle it. but one must be familiar with them : one must be aware of what has been already done in the way of art, as well as conversant with nature. simply to study nature is not enough. we have to know how artists of all times have interpreted nature; how the same artist, or artists of the same period, treated natural form differently, according to the material employed, conform- ably with the position of the work, in view of the use it was to serve. knowing all this, and being perfectly at home in the world of nature, one may set to work to conventionalise on one's own account. there is some chance of success then, not otherwise. nature in ornament. those who most keenly feel the need in ornament of a quality which the modern nature-worshipper delights to disparage, will be inclined to pray that they may be pre- served from some of their allies. there is, or was not long ago, a class of ornament in vogue, which appears to have originated in the idea that you have only to flatten out any kind of natural detail, and arrange it symmetrically upon arbitrary lines, and the end of ornament is achieved. decorative design is not so easy as all that. to emasculate a natural form is not to fit it for ornamental use, and to distribute detail according to diagram is not to design. the result may be conventional, but it is not the kind of convention i am upholding ; one touch of nature is worth all the mechanical and life- less stuff of that kind that ever was done. one hopes, and tries to think, that this sort of thing is dying out, if not quite dead already ; but then one flatters oneself so readily that what has been proved absurd must be extinct, or moribund at least; until, perhaps, an enforced stay among the philis- tines brings us face to face with the evidence how very much it is alive. we have only weeded it out of our little garden plot ; about us is a wide world where it is rampant. there introductory. is no hiding it from ourselves, there is life in the old dogma yet; and, alas, in many another. it is still as necessary as ever to deny the claim of merely geometric reconstruction to represent the due adaptation of natural forms to decorative needs. it is no more fair to take this ridiculously childish work to repre- sent conventional design than it would be to instance the immature studies of some raw student as examples of naturalistic treatment. compare the best with the best. compare the ceramic painting of sèvres with that of ancient greece, china, or japan; compare the work of palissy with that of the potters of persia and moresque spain; compare the finest aubusson carpet with a persian rug of the best period ; compare the earlier arras (such as we have at hampton court) with the most illusive of modern gobelins tapestry ; compare the traditional swiss wood-carving on the châlet fronts at meyringen and there- abouts with the most ingenious model pro- duced in the same district for the english and american tourist; compare the peasant jewellery of almost any country except our own (we never seem to have had any) with the modern gewgaws which have taken its place; and who would hesitate to choose the more conventional art ? nature in ornament. conventional treatment, it will be seen, is no mere stopping short of perfect rendering, no bald excuse for incompetence. it will be my task to show that, if it does not on the one hand consist in the substitution of the diagram of a thing instead of its life and growth, neither does it mean the mere distor- tion of natural details, nor yet that mechanical repetition of ancient conventions which is a weariness to every one concerned in it. our rendering of natural form must be our own, natural to us; but without some sort of con- ventionality (if we must use the word) deco- ration is impossible. there is no art without convention; and your most determined realist is in his way as conventional as the best, or worst, of us. it is not the word conventional for which i am contending, but that fit treatment of ornament which folk seem agreed to call by the title, more especially when they want to abuse it. by whatever name it is called, we cannot afford to let go our hold of that some- thing which distinguishes the decorative art of every country, period, and master, from the crude attempts of such as have not so much as grasped the idea that there is in art some- thing more than a dishing up of the raw facts of nature. introductory. ii work as nearly natural as man can make it, though not in itself decorative, may be at times available in decoration. but forms de- naturalised by men alike ignorant of the principles and unskilled in the practice of ornament, and more than half contemptuous of design to boot, are of no interest to any one but their authors, if even to them. nature and art are not on such bad terms that to be unnatural is to be ornamental. i nature in ornament. ii. ornament in nature. nature being admittedly the primal source of all our inspiration, it is rather curious to observe the limited range within which we have been content to seek ideas, how we have gone on reflecting reflections of reflections, as though we dared not face the naked light of nature. with all the wealth of suggestion in the world about us and the never-ending variety of natural detail, the types which have sufficed for the ancient and mediæval world, and for that matter for ourselves too, are, compara- tively speaking, very few indeed. how largely the ornament of egypt and assyria is based upon the lotus, the papyrus, and the palm ! the vine, the ivy, and the olive, the fir-tree and the oak, together with the merest remin- iscence of the acanthus, went far to satisfy not only the greeks but their roman and renaissance imitators as well. gothic art went further afield, and gathered plate . apanese roses "photo-tint, by james akerman london wc japanese roses. ornament an in nature. into its posy the lily and the rose, the pome- granate and the passion flower, the maple and the trefoil, but still only a comparatively small selection of the plants a-growing and a-blowing within sight of the village church. oriental art is more conservative still ; in it a very few types recur continually, with a monotony which becomes at last tedious. one wonders what chinese art would have been without the aster and the peony, or japanese without the almond blossom and bamboo, what arab ornament would be but for the un-leaf-like leaf peculiar to it. one is struck sometimes by the degree of variety in the treatment which a single type may undergo in different hands; more often it is the sameness of the renderings which impresses us. probably in the case of no single plant have the possibles in the way of ornamental adapta- tion been exhausted, and in many instances the very plainest hints in the way of design have not been taken. the rose, for example, has been very variously treated ; but comparatively little use has been made of the fruit, or of the thorns, or of the broad stipules at the base of the leaves. we have to be grateful when the buds, with their boldly pronounced sepals, are, : nature in ornament. lato breros