id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_tc3b5q2lbrdb7bxcujcvkjbl44	Kim Holmberg	Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication	2014	15	.pdf	application/pdf	8144	705	61	This paper investigates disciplinary differences in how researchers use the microblogging site Twitter. from selected researchers in ten disciplines (astrophysics, biochemistry, digital humanities, economics, history of retweet more than the average Twitter users in earlier research and there were clear disciplinary differences in researchers in different disciplines use Twitter. 2. How are researchers in different disciplines using Twitter for scholarly established Twitter-using researchers and an analysis of their tweets should give an indication Twitter users, while researchers in cognitive science (964 tweets), biochemistry (892 tweets), of science 27% of the tweets were shared links, but in digital humanities only 15.5% of the only 5% of the tweets were for scholarly communication or discipline-relevant, while the An informal content analysis of the tweets from the Scholarly communication category why researchers are using social media sites like Twitter in scholarly communication. unclear tweets in every discipline suggest that Twitter is found more useful by the researchers 	./cache/work_tc3b5q2lbrdb7bxcujcvkjbl44.pdf	./txt/work_tc3b5q2lbrdb7bxcujcvkjbl44.txt