Poster-DARIAH2020_MToscano I N S I G H T S O N S C H O L A R L Y P R I M I T I V E S F R O M D I G I T A L H U M A N I T I E S R E S E A R C H I N S P A I N CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES METHODOLOGY DATA ANALYSED ∫ It takes more primitives to build a resource than to use it, as it takes more skills to write a book than to read it. ∫ PHILOLOGY LINGUISTICS HISTORY ARCHEOLOGY ART HISTORY HERITAGE MUSICOLOGY DOCUMENTATION COMMUNICATION EDUCATION TOTALS DIGITAL 
 LIBRARY 12 1 1 14 DATABASE 17 2 3 2 1 1 26 REPOSITO- RY 3 2 1 4 6 1 16 CORPUS 1 1 CATALOGUE 1 1 2 1 1 6 CROWD- SOURCING 1 1 1 3 PORTAL 4 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 12 DICTIONARY 1 1 MAP 1 1 2 4 WEB APP 1 1 2 MOBILE APP 2 2 TOTALS 38 6 8 9 6 6 3 8 3 1 88 I n order to provide the global community of scholars working in this field with a greater under- standing of the current Spanish scenario, LINHD has recently promoted a research on the evolu- tion of Digital Humanities in Spain in the last 25 years, a timeframe comparable with Unsworth first formulation of scholarly primitives. More than 1,000 records have been mapped, distributed as follow: 577 researchers; 368 projects; 88 resources; 9 post-graduate courses; and 8 specialised journals. Digital resources (i.e. reposito- ries of documents, collections of artefacts, crowdsourcing platforms, dictionaries, databases, etc.), which are the object of this poster, have been produced, most of the time, with the aim to publish a service to improve the basic of day-to-day research workflow in the Humanities. Our initial objectives were: - to classify and describe the digital resources mapped according with the classical and new scholarly primitives, in order to highlight presences, absence and recurring associations of these categories; - To visualise the relationships between scholarly primitives and other dimensions in our data, like discipline and typology. - to identify how the introduction of digital tools and methods has affected the basic functions of research in the Humanities in Spain over time. DARIAH VIRTUAL ANNUAL EVENT 2020: SCHOLARLY PRIMITIVES, November 10th to 13th 2020
 dariah-ae-2020@sciencesconf.org RESULTS 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Dis co ve rin g An no tat ing Co mp ari ng Re fer rin g Sa mp lin g Illu str ati ng Re pr es en tin g Se arc hin g Co lle cti ng Re ad ing W rit ing Co lla bo rat ing M on ito rin g No te- tak ing Tra ns lat ing Da ta Pr ac tic es Co din g Cr ow ds ou rci ng M od ell ing So ftw ar e u sa ge Digital Li brary Database Rep osito ry Co rpu s Catal ogue Crowdso urc ing Portal Dic tio nary Map Web app Mobil e app 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Dis co ve rin g An no tat ing Co mp ari ng Re fer rin g Sa mp lin g Illu str ati ng Re pr es en tin g Se arc hin g Co lle cti ng Re ad ing W rit ing Co lla bo rat ing Da ta Pr ac tic es Cr ow ds ou rci ng M od ell ing So ftw ar e u sa ge Digital Li brary Database Rep osito ry Co rpu s Catal ogue Crowdso urc ing Portal Dic tio nary Map Web app Mobil e app REFERENCES S cholarly primitives involved in the implementation of different kinds of digital resources. It stands out that almost all primitives can be involved, at different stages in the design and implementation of these artefacts. Some association is obvious, such as databases with data modelling; digital libraries with collecting; portal with referring. Others are less, such as the collaborative dimensions of many of them or the vast usage of data curation (annotating). Type of resources that, in percentage, seems to require a larger variety of primitives are crowdsourcing platforms, databases and portals (~10 each); those with less are maps and mobile apps (~4 each). 1) BOREK, L., DOMBROWSKI, Q., PERKINS, J., & SCHÖCH, C.: Scholarly Primitives Revisited: Towards a Practical Taxonomy of Digital Humanities Research Activities and Objects. Zenodo. 2014. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10866 2) PALMER, C. L., TEFFEAU L. C. AND PIRMANN C. M.; Scholarly Information Prac- tices in the Online Environment: Themes from the Literature and Implications for Li- brary Service Development, 2009 3) TOSCANO M., DÍAZ A.; Mapping digital humanities in Spain - 1993-2019 (Version v1.0) [Dataset]. Zenodo, 2020 http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3893546 4) TOSCANO M., RABADÁN A., ROS S., GONZÁLEZ-BLANCO E.; Digital Humanities in Spain: historical perspective and current scenario, Profesional de la información, v. 29, n. 6, e290401, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.nov.01 5) UNSWORTH J.; Scholarly Primitives: what methods do humanities researchers have in common, and how might our tools reflect this?, Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities, 2000. Maurizio Toscano Digital Humanities Researcher at University of Granada maurizio@ugr.es | @MauToscano | 
 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5418-3859 Lidia Bocanegra Barbecho Digital Humanities responsible - MedialabUGR lbocanegra@ugr.es | @Lidia_Bocanegra | 
 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9479-5921 Salvador Ros Director of LINHD - UNED sros@scc.uned.es | @srosmu | 
 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6330-4958 Elena Gonzalez-Blanco
 Associate professor IE egonzalezblanco@faculty.ie.edu | @elenagbg | 
 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0448-1812 Authorship S cholarly primitives exploitable from different kinds of digital resources for DH in Spain. We can observe that the range of primi- tives that digital resources are built for is much narrow that those involved and needed for their design and development and some of them are not present at all. An interesting comparison can be made between Searching and Discovery. Searching is the traditional way of interacting with digital resources such as databases, repositories or digital library. Discovery imply a different frontend approach, where content is dynamically presented to the user in a proactive manner. It is a much more recent tendency, way less consolidated, but already spread out across almost the full range of categories. T o perform this analysis, the digital resources collected in our database has been classified and described according to the following Scholarly Primitives (SP): Unsworth SP (2000): Discovering, Annotating, Comparing, Referring, Sampling, Illustrating, Representing. Palmers SP (2009): Searching Collecting, reading, Writing, Collaborating, Cross-cut- ting (Monitoring, Note-Taking, Translating, Data Practices). Additional SP: Software usage, Software Development (Coding), Data Modelling, Crowdsourcing. Most of the digital resources analyses have been conceived and developed in the context of research projects; others have been more institutional initiatives. In both cases, we an- alysed which primitives were involved in the design and development of the resource (i.e. what type of research activities have been necessary to generate them) and then for what scholarly primitives each artefact has been conceived for (i.e. what type of research activity the resource is intended for, how can be exploited). The vast majority of the re- sources have been classified based on the public evidence, since we can only speculate about the strategies adopted in those projects. Others, where we have been involved in the development phase, have been described based on hands-on evidence. The methodology process followed has been: - bibliography review in relation to SP; - incorporate SP into the database data model, as taxonomies; - cataloguing of the digital resources in relation to the list of identified primitives; - quantification and analysis of the outputs obtained. mailto:maurizio@ugr.es https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5418-3859 mailto:lbocanegra@ugr.es https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9479-5921 mailto:sros@scc.uned.es https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6330-4958 mailto:egonzalezblanco@faculty.ie.edu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0448-1812 http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10866 http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3893546 https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.nov.01 mailto:maurizio@ugr.es https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5418-3859 mailto:lbocanegra@ugr.es https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9479-5921 mailto:sros@scc.uned.es https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6330-4958 mailto:egonzalezblanco@faculty.ie.edu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0448-1812 http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10866 http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3893546 https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.nov.01 CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES DATA ANALYSED ∫ It takes more primitives to build a resource than to use it, as it takes more skills to write a book than to read it. ∫ METHODOLOGY RESULTS REFERENCES