OPEN ACCESS
Model of Water, Energy and Waste Management for Development of
Eco-Innovation Park ; A Case Study of Center for Research of Science
and Technology “PUSPIPTEK,” South Tangerang City, Indonesia†
Sri Setiawati1*, Hadi Alikodra2, Bambang Pramudya2, and Arya Hadi Dharmawan2
Bogor Agricultural University, The Ministry of Research and Technology The Republic of Indonesia1, Bogor Agricultural University2
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
Abstract concept of sustainable development must be trans-
lated into concrete measures in the form of policies, programs
and activities carried out jointly by the government, private
sector and society at large. Various models of synergy between
economic and environmental concept is growing in almost all
†This work is a part of a dissertation submitted for doctoral degree of corresponding
Author at Graduate School of Bogor Agricultural University (IPB).
*Correspondence to : Sri Setiawati
Graduate school of Bogor Agricultural University (IPB)
Director of S&T Supply-Demand Network, The Ministry of Research and Technology, Republic of
Indonesia
E-mail : asdep42@yahoo.com
World Technopolis Review
Copyright©World Technopolis Association
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attri-
bution Non-Commercial License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits
unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original work is properly cited
Abstract : Center for Research of Science and Technology (“PUSPIPTEK”) has 460 hectares land area, still maintained as a green area with more than
30% green space. There are 47 centers for research and testing technology, technology-based industries, and as well as public supporting
facilities in PUSPIPTEK area. Based on the concepts developed to make this area as an ecological region, PUSPIPTEK can be seen as a model of
eco-innovation.
The purpose of this research is to develop a model of water, energy and waste management with eco-innovation concept. As a new approach
in addressing environmental degradation and maintaining the sustainability of ecosystem, studies related to eco-innovation policy that com-
bines the management of water, energy and waste in the region has not been done.
In order to achieve the objectives of the research, a series of techniques for collecting data on PUSPIPTEK existing conditions will be carried out,
which includes utilities data (water, electricity, sewage) and master plan of this area. The savings over the implementation of the concept of
eco-innovation in water, energy, and waste management were calculated and analyzed using quatitative methods. The amount of cost savings
and feasibility were then calculated. Eco innovation in water management among other innovations include the provision of alternative sourc-
es of water, overflow of rain water and water environments utilization, and use of gravity to replace the pumping function. Eco-innovation in
energy management innovations include the use of LED and solar cell for air conditioning. Eco-innovation in waste management includes
methods of composting for organic waste management.
The research results: (1) The savings that can be achieved with the implementation of eco innovation in the water management is Rp.
3,032,640 daily, or Rp.1,106,913,600 annually; (2) The savings derived from the implementation of eco innovation through replacement of
central AC to AC LiBr Solar Powered will be saved Rp.1,933,992,990 annually and the use of LED lights in the Public street lighting PUSPIPTEK
saved Rp.163,454,433 annually; (3) Application of eco innovation in waste management will be able to raise awareness of the environment
by sorting organic, inorganic and plastic waste. Composting and plastic waste obtained from the sale revenue of Rp. 44,016,000 per year; (4)
Overall, implementation of the eco-innovation system in PUSPIPTEK area can saves Rp. 3,248,377,023 per year, compared to the existing sys-
tem; and (5)The savings are obtained with implementation of eco-innovation is considered as income. Analysis of the feasibility of the imple-
mentation of eco-innovation in water, energy, and waste management in PUSPIPTEK give NPV at a 15% discount factor in Rp. 3,895,228,761;
23.20% of IRR and 4.48 years of PBP. Thus the model of eco-innovation in the area PUSPIPTEK is feasible to implement.
Keywords: Eco-Innovation, Policy development, Science park
WTR 2014;3:89-96 http://dx.doi.org/10.7165/wtr2014.3.2.89
892014 Copyright©World Technopolis Association
Article
Article
countries as a model of eco-development, eco-efficiency,
cleaner production, eco-industrial areas as well as regional de-
velopment model of eco-innovation. In general these models
aim to integrate the economic interests on the one side with
protecting the environment on the other side.
As a new concept, eco-innovation model is exclusive, be-
cuse it is not only related to the technical aspects of the envi-
ronment, but also it includes the realm of management, policy
and social innovation. The concept of eco-innovation by
OECD (2009) is “the creation or adoption of new, or signifi-
cantly improved products (goods and services), processes,
marketing methods, organizational and institutional struc-
tures, as well as rules aimed at keeping the environmental im-
provement as compared to alternative relevant”. Sarkar (2013)
concluded that the various definitions that developed the con-
cept of eco-innovation can be divided into two categories:
non-environmental innovation and environmental innovation.
In terms of development, sustainable environment innovation
becomes very important. This concept can also be classified
into: eco-technology innovation, eco-innovation organization,
innovation related to the business district and social innova-
tion.
At the meso level, the eco-industrial park can also be re-
ferred to as eco-innovation park. Sakr et al. (2011) stated that
the critical success factors of eco-industries park around the
world are covering partnership relationship, economic value
added, policies and regulations, awareness and information,
establishment of institutional and organizational, and technical
factors. Andersen (2006) makes classification of eco-innova-
tion into 5 categories as follows: Add-on innovation, integrated
innovation, eco-efficient technological system, eco-organiza-
tional system and general purpose eco-efficient innovations.
Therefore, the study of water, energy and waste are based on
the add-on innovation category. The product of technology in
this study comes from and has been developed by researchers
in PUSPIPTEK.
Center for Research of Science and Technology “PUS-
PIPTEK” is a national strategic area that has tremendous po-
tential for the development of science and technology,
economic, social and environmental. The growing develop-
ment of South Tangerang city includes the expansion of resi-
dential areas, industrial and office growth, and these
development areas will bring tremendous consequences to
changes in land use, the environment, biodiversity and so-
cio-cultural systems. The model of policy for Development of
PUSPIPTEK Eco-Innovation area is a model of an integrated
policy covering the management of water, energy and waste,
regional management model and the institutional model with
the concept of eco-innovation that PUSPIPTEK area will be an
integrated sustainable science and technology area.
1.2 Research Objectives
The purpose of this research is to build a model of policy for
eco-innovation development in the PUSPIPTEK area. The spe-
cific objectives are:
1. Knowing the existing condition of water, energy and
waste management at the PUSPIPTEK area.
2. Develop a submodel of water, energy and waste manage-
ment to the eco-innovationconcept.
The model of policy is expected to help policy makers (cen-
tral and local government), actors of science and technology,
industries and other parties who are interested in the eco-in-
novation development in PUSPIPTEK.
1.3 Novelty of Research
Research on specific areas of center for research of science
and technology as well as national vital and strategic objects
have a very high complexity in the management area that needs
to be formulated in an integrated system. In the region there is
a research nuclear reactor, research centers for physics, chemis-
try, biotechnology and others. Those require an integrated envi-
ronmental management policy in order to provide security and
comfort for the people who are inside and outside the region.
The research model of policy for eco-innovation in PUSPIPTEK
region has never been done. Therefore, from aspect of the con-
cept approach and location, this research has a novelty.
A model of policy for eco-innovation development in PUS-
PIPTEK with the eco-innovation of water, energy and waste
management is the novelty of this research.
2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2.1 Framework
As a center for research of science and technology, every
stage of its activity in PUSPIPTEK requires lots of high quality
of material, energy and water resources. Meanwhile, PUS-
90 2014 Copyright©World Technopolis Association
WTR 2014;3:89-96 http://dx.doi.org/10.7165/wtr2014.3.2.89
PIPTEK still used conventional method to provide energy,
water and other material, in order to fulfill the need of labo-
ratory and utility areas until recently. If this condition is con-
tinued, it will threathen the future activities in PUSPIPTEK.
For example, PUSPIPTEK is very dependent on Cisadane river
as a resource for water, however the status of Cisadane river
is worsening due to the river becoming polluted. In addition,
the process of research and technology development at the
same time generates solid and liquid waste or hazardous ma-
terials. Therefore, to sustain overall activities in PUSPIPTEK,
there is a need to develop policy to preserve the environmen-
tal and synergy with development activities in the area of
PUSPIPTEK by designing sustainable ecology through innova-
tion.
2.2 Place and Time of Research
The research model of policy fordevelopment eco-innova-
tion park is in the Science & Technology Research Center
(PUSPIPTEK), South Tangerang City. This study was con-
ducted in June 2013 to December 2013.
2.3 Data Processing Techniques
1. Data processing techniques were performed with the fol-
lowing stages: (i) Analysis of water management by calcu-
lating quantitative of water management with eco
innovation, (ii) determining of infrastructure investment
based on eco-infrastructure concept, including the provi-
sion of alternative sources of water from the overflow of
rain water, (iii) calculating water treatment cost savings
by using innovation in the process production of water
drainage via gravity process without the use of pumps;
(iv) analysing financial water management based on eco
innovation. In addition to the above stages, the analysis of
eco energy management innovations, which includes
quantitative calculation of energy use and the use of LED
lights with AC with Solar Cell; is also necessary. This can
be calculated for saving the cost based on energy manage-
ment efficiency.
2. Analysis of the eco-innovation of waste management,
which includes domestic waste, by composting method
for organic waste and waste management feasibility of
composting techniques.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Analysis submodel Eco-innovation of Water Manage-
ment
Water is a part of the natural resources controlled by the
state and used for the welfare of the people in a sustainable
manner, as set forth in article on paragraph 3 of the Indone-
sian Constitution. The Republic of Indonesian (1960) con-
firms that earth, water and air space, including natural
resources contained within the territory of the Republic of
Indonesia are gifts of God Almighty and national treasures.
The water resources for multipurpose benefits welfare of the
entire people in all areas of social, economic, cultural, politi-
cal, and national security fields. Definition of conservation of
water resources is an effort to maintain the existence and
continuity of the state, the nature and function of water re-
sources in order to be always available in sufficient quantity
and quality to meet the needs of living things, both at present
and in the future.
Water conservation can be interpreted as efforts to increase
the amount of ground water that goes into the ground and to
create efficient water use. Each treatment given on a piece of
land will affect the water system at the site and downstream
areas. Soil and water conservation are two things that are very
closely related, so it may be said that the various soil conserva-
tion measures are also water conservation measures (Arsyad
2000).
The eco-innovation concept in water management at PUS-
PIPTEK is to create the ponds (“embung”) as a water source
outside Cisadane used today. Ponds also serve as a rainwater.
Water from the ponds flows by gravity to the piping system to
the water treatment facility. This model provides cost savings
compared to the drainage of water from the river Cisadane
using an electric pump. Data of the water processing in PUS-
PIPTEK currently is presented in
below. The exis-
tence of ponds in the PUSPIPTEK area presented in
below.
The feedstock of water is assumed to be 30% of the total
requirement based on Green Building Council Indonesia
(GBCI 2012) criteria for achieving platinum grade. In this sce-
nario, the investment that needs to be calculated is the addi-
tion of an area of ponds, water channeling investment from
the ponds to the water treatment plant by gravity. Investment
costs required of Rp. 7,960,243,200 are presented in below.
912014 Copyright©World Technopolis Association
Sri Setiawati, Hadi Alikodra, Bambang Pramudya, and Arya Hadi Dharmawan, WTR3(2):89
Article
92 2014 Copyright©World Technopolis Association
Table 1. Data of the water processing in PUSPIPTEK Table 2. Investments and expenses necessary for the substitution of 30%
water of the total requirement
Water Treatment Data Value Unit
Water produced 233,280 m3/month
Processing time 30 Day
Capacity per day 7,776 m3
Rain
water
Availability
Rainfall 154.9 mm/year
Rain broad area
of buildings
2,609,200 m2
The volume of
rainwater
404,165,080 m3/year
Assumption of
50% of rain
water can be
discharged into
ponds
202,082,540 m3/year
Ponds evapora-
tion and
absorption
factor of 30%
60,624,762 m3/year
The availability
of water in the
ponds
141,457,778 m3/year
387,556 m3/day
Ponds
(“embung”)
capacity
Total Area of
ponds in
housing and
other areas
15,000 m2
The depth of
water in the
ponds
3 M
Ponds capacity 45,000 m3
Substitutionof water feedstock
scenario
Value Unit
Percentage to get a value of 4
points on the GBCI assess-
ment
30 %
Substitution capavity
69,984 m3/month
2,333 m3/day
Equivalent of water
capacity in the ponds
80 day
Ponds capacity necessary 186,624 m3
Additional ponds capacity 141,624 m3
Addition areas 47,208 m2
Investments for water distribu-
tion from ponds to the water
treatment facility
- -
Line 1 : from ponds in the
PUSPITEK area to guest
house
1,000 m
Line 2: from ponds in the
housing area to guest
house
1,800 m
excavation ponds 141,624 m3
Work stages Value Unit Unit Cost (Rp)
excavation ponds 141,624 m3 36,000
Excavation line 1 120 m3 50,000
Excavation line 2 216 m3 50,000
Installation of U 20 x 30cm
concrete line 1
1,000 m 360,000
Installation of U 20 x 30cm
concrete line 2
1,800 m 360,000
Mobilization, demobiliza-
tion& cleaning process
1 lot 1,836,979,200
Total Investments (Rp): 7,960,243,200
Source: Analysis of Survey Results 2013
Fig. 1. Slope maps and existing ponds location in PUSPIPTEK
existing
ponds
WTR 2014;3:89-96 http://dx.doi.org/10.7165/wtr2014.3.2.89
The cost savings derived from electricity for pumping and
chemical costs. The calculation saving that can be achieved is
presented in below. The savings that can be
achieved with the implementation of the eco-innovation water
management per day is Rp. 3,032,640 or Rp. 1,106,913,600 per
year. Similar funding has been found; Zaenuri (2009) con-
cluded that by implementing water management in farmacyti-
cal industry has been generating cost efficiency 57.5% per a
year.
3.2 Analysis submodel Eco-Innovation Energy Manage-
ment
The issue of energy crisis and global warming have become
the attention of the whole world. Various technologies and
innovations are being developed to find a solution. In addition
to finding alternative energy sources that are environmentally
friendly, energy saving is being done to reduce the rate of en-
ergy consumption. Solution of energy crisis is not only coming
from in terms of alternative energy production, but in terms of
consumption.
Electricity consumption in buildings is most used by the air
cooling system. The conventional air-conditioning (AC) con-
sumes relatively very large energy, and requires a large electric
power. In Indonesia, the majority of electricity is generated
through the use of fossil fuels, so the use of conventional air
conditioning has impact on the increase in greenhouse gas
emissions. Furthermore, because the ambient temperature
gets hotter, more and more industries, houses, and buildings
use AC, thus causing the cycle of environmental destruction
and the energy crisis continues.
However, inhibition of the use of air conditioning is impos-
sible. Therefore, it is necessary that the air conditioner innova-
tions use renewable energy sources, and eco-friendly, one of
which is conditioned by solar power. Air conditioning with
solar power using solar thermal cooling system cools the room
by using the heat of the sun. In such systems, the boiling point
of fluid is achieved by thermal compression (Akbar 2014).
To replace the compressor in a conventional refrigeration
system, three components are used in the absorption cycle,
i.e. absorber, pumps, and generators. Absorber is used to ab-
sorb the refrigerant vapor into the absorbent, so the two are
mixed into a solution. The fluid used is water with LiBr (lith-
ium bromide). Water and LiBr is used because they meet the
criteria of the working fluid (a mixture of refrigerant and ab-
sorbent), namely :
1) The different boiling point between the refrigerant and
the solution at the same great pressure.
2) Refrigerant has a high heat of vaporization and high con-
centration in the absorbent solution to suppress the cir-
culation rate between the absorber and generator
per-unit cooling capacity.
3) Having good transport properties, such as viscosity, ther-
mal conductivity, and diffusion coefficient. They can gen-
erate good heat and mass transfer.
4) Both refrigerant and absorbent are non-corrosive, envi-
ronmentally friendly, and inexpensive.
If the sun is not hot enough, it can also be backed up with a
gas heater. Ursula Eicker and Dirk Pietruschka in “Optimisa-
tion and Economics of Solar Cooling Systems” have calculated
the cost of each AC Solar Cell for Cooling Power / KW which
are presented in below.
932014 Copyright©World Technopolis Association
Table 3. Results of Calculation of Water Production Cost Savings with Eco-In-
novation
Expected saving Value Unit
The production cost of water
(Normal Price)
1,300 Rp/m3
The composition of the
electricity cost
95 %
The composition of the
chemical cost
5 %
Electricity (95%) 1,235 Rp/m3
Chemicals (5%) 65 Rp/m3
With water feedstock from rain
water
- -
Electricity (95%) 864.5 Rp/m3
Chemicals (5%) 45.5 Rp/m3
Production cost 910 Rp/m3
Production cost saving 390 Rp/m3
Production cost saving daily 3,032,640 Rp.
Production cost saving
annually
1,106,913,600 Rp.
Sri Setiawati, Hadi Alikodra, Bambang Pramudya, and Arya Hadi Dharmawan, WTR3(2):89
Article
94 2014 Copyright©World Technopolis Association
Table 4. Calculation of savings with LiBr Solar Powered AC
An operational cost per year for Solar Cell AC includes
power delivery, electricity, and equipment maintenance and
water circulation. Calculations using regression analysis to ob-
tain the graph AC power relations and operational costs per
year in Euros can be calculated in each scenario.
Comparison of the data in the conventional AC and LiBr So-
lar Powered AC in PUSPIPTEK with value investing and the
cost savings calculation results are presented in
below. For the implementation of eco innovation with LiBr
Solar powered AC will save Rp. 1,933,992,990 per year.
3.3 Eco Innovation Using LED Lights
Besides saving air conditioning, it can be done by replacing
the bulbs with LED bulbs with the same strong irradiation.
This calculation is performed for PJU lamp in PUSPIPTEK re-
gion. For comparative analysis of cost savings results are pre-
sented in .
The implementation of eco-innovation in the use of LED
lights at public street lighting in the PUSPIPTEK area saved Rp.
163,454,433 per year.
3.4 Analysis submodel Eco-Innovations Domestic Waste
Management
PUSPIPTEK is cover areas for laboratories, offices, housing
and Technology-Based Industrial Zone (development plan).
The types of waste include domestic wastewater, domestic
waste, laboratories waste and hazardous and toxic (B3) waste.
B3 waste generated that has been handled well in PUSPIPTEK
includes B3 waste from laboratories and radioactive waste
from nuclear research installations.
The implementation of eco-innovation model that was car-
ried out in the domestic waste management, was calculated
on the basis of the organic waste from fallen leaves and do-
mestic waste. This new concept is considered as a new break-
through model which improve the behaviour of the people
living in PUSPIPTEK.
Composting financial analysis has been carried out in or-
Fig. 2. Costs required for every cooling Power
Source: Eicker and Pietruschka 2009
Sp
ec
ifi
c
co
st
w
ith
ou
t V
AT
/
EU
R
kW
-1
Cooling power / kW
IEA handbook
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Table 5. Comparison of cost savings between LED Lightsand conventional
light at public street lighting in the PUSPIPTEK area
No Parameter
LED
Lights
Conventional
Lights (bulb)
1 Life time 40,000 6,000
2
Electricity consumption
(watt)
13 85
3 Price of lamp (Rp.) 135,000 25,000
4
Use of Electricity Over
40,000 Hours (Watt)
520 3,400
5 Electricity price (Rp) 468,000 3,060,000
6
Replacement lamp for
40,000 Hours (times)
1 7
7
Cost for replacement
lamp (Rp.)
135,000 166,667
8
Total Cost Over 40,000
Hours (Rp.)
603,000 3,226,667
9
Cost Savings for
40,000 hours (Rp.)
- 2,623,667
The savings for all public street
lighting in the PUSPIPTEK area
/40,000 hours (Rp.)
1,836,566,667 -
Saving annually (Rp.) 163,454,433 -
Investment in LED lights 94,500,000 -
Parameter
Existing /
Conventional AC
LiBr Solar
Powered AC
investment costs (Rp.) 1,731,661,708 2,164,577,136
Installation cost (Rp.) 86,583,085 108,228,857
Integration cost(Rp.) 207,799,405 259,749,256
Total Capital Cost(Rp.) 2,026,044,199 2,532,555,249
Annual expenses(Rp.) 1,944,815,876 10,822,886
Difference in annual
expenses/Cost Savings
(Rp.)
1,933,992,990
WTR 2014;3:89-96 http://dx.doi.org/10.7165/wtr2014.3.2.89
der to calculate the net income for composting. Financial
analysis in eco-innovations compost processing is presented
in below. Revenue from composting and waste
plastic sale obtained Rp. 44,016,000 per year. This study is in
line with study that have been done in Simongan Industrial
Park in Semarang City. The study concluded that eco-effi-
ciency on recycle water waste in industry galvanis has made
efficiency 46.2% in 2004 and 83.4% in 2008. Meanwhile, far-
macytical industry developed eco-efficiency through reuse
of paper, waste management of paper and CBRNE. It has
been an impact to decrease cost operasional of company
(Zaenuri 2009).
Some of the assumptions used in the analysis of the feasibil-
ity of the implementation of the Eco Innovation are:
1) Investment cost required only in year 0
2) Maintenance cost required in year 1 to 10
3) Ponds (“embung”) maintenance fee is 5% of investment
value per year
4) Increase in electricity tariff is 10% per year
5) Increase in costs & income is 10% per year
In the feasibility analysis, the savings obtained with the im-
plementation of eco-innovation is considered as income.
Fixed capital investment is calculated from the cost of equip-
ment and other expenses incurred by the implementation of
innovations in water, waste and energy management that has
been previously calculated.
The feasibility analysis was performed by calculating several
parameters, namely: Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of
Return (IRR) and Payback Period (PBP). NPV is the present
value of an investment’s expected cash inflows minus the
costs of acquiring the investment. IRR is the interest rate at
which the net present value of all the cash flows (both positive
and negative) from a project or investment equals zero. IRR is
used to evaluate the attractiveness of a project or investment.
PBP is the amount of time taken to break even on an invest-
ment.
This feasibility analysis generates NPV at a 15% discount fac-
tor of Rp. 3,895,228,761; IRR 23.20% and PBP 4.48 year. Based
on those indicators, it can be concluded the model of eco-in-
novation in the area PUSPIPTEK is feasible to implement. Tian
et al. (2013) have conducted study of the performance of
eco-industrial park development in China. The finding shows
that (1) industrial added value of 17 eco-industrial parks as
whole increased by 56%; (2) for energy consumption, fresh
water consumption, industrial waste water generation and
solid waste production of 17 eco-industrial park as whole in-
creased 20%, 18%, 12%, and 6% respectively. Furthermore,
eco-efficiency programs in PUSPIPTEK have been designed in
line with President Instruction No. 13, 2011 on Energy and
Water Saving. The instruction is guidance of government of-
fice to make action plan relating to energy and water savings
on their office management.
952014 Copyright©World Technopolis Association
Table 6 . Financial analysis results of compost processing
Parameter Value Unit
Capacity 7 m3/day
Volume of plastic waste 10 kg/day
Fine compost selling price 600 Rp/Kg
Granulescompost selling price 1,250 Rp/Kg
Plastic selling price 4,000 Rp/Kg
Daily labor cost 50,000 Rp/hari
Daily labor number 18 Peoples
electricity tariffs 947 Rp/Kwh
Hours of operation 8 Hours
Power Requirement 10% of load 125 kW
Number of working days 240 Days
Cost of maintenance / labor 3
%
* labor
Cost of packaging 1
%
* value of sales
Assuming all the products sold in the form of fine compost
Volume of fine compost production 1,500 kg/day
Operating Costs 181,584,000 Rp/year
Electricity costs 68,184,000 Rp/year
Labor costs 108,000,000 Rp/year
Maintenance costs 3,240,000 Rp/year
Packaging cost 2,160,000 Rp/year
Revenue 225,600,000 Rp/year
Fine compost 216,000,000 Rp/year
Plastic 9,600,000 Rp/year
Margin / Profit Results 44,016,000 Rp/year
Sri Setiawati, Hadi Alikodra, Bambang Pramudya, and Arya Hadi Dharmawan, WTR3(2):89
Article
4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 Conclusion
Based on this research, a model of policy for development
of eco-innovation park(case study of Center for Research of
Science and Technology “PUSPIPTEK” South Tangerang City)
is concluded as follows:
1) Eco-innovation on water management with scenarios wa-
ter feedstock by 30% of the total requirement comes
from the ponds in the area. The savings that can be
achieved with the implementation of eco-innovation in
the water management is Rp. 3,032,640 daily, or Rp.
1,106,913,600 per year
2) The savings derived from the implementation of eco in-
novation through replacement of central AC to AC LiBr
Solar Powered will be Rp. 1,933,992,990 annually, and the
use of LED lights in the public street lighting PUSPIPTEK
saved Rp.163,454,433 per year
3) Eco-innovation in waste management will be able to raise
awareness of the environment by sorting organic, inor-
ganic and plastic waste. Composting and plastic waste
obtained from the sale revenue is Rp. 44,016,000 per year
4) Overall, implementation of the eco-innovation system in
PUSPIPTEK area can saves Rp. 3,248,377,023 per year,
compared to the existing system.
5) The savings that are obtained with implementation of
eco-innovation is considered as income. Analysis of the
feasibility of the implementation of eco-innovation in wa-
ter, energy, and waste management in PUSPIPTEK gives
NPV at a 15% discount factor in Rp. 3,895,228,761; 23.20%
of IRR and 4.48 years of PBP. Thus the model of eco-inno-
vation in the area PUSPIPTEK is feasible to implement.
4.2 Suggestion
Some research suggestions in the preparation for develop-
ment of eco-innovation in PUSPIPTEK area are as follows :
1) To get the title as the eco-innovation park, it is recom-
mended that PUSPIPTEK management make the strate-
gic planning involving consultant certified by Green
Building Council Indonesia (GBCI).
2) Policy to make PUSPIPTEK as regional eco-innovation di-
rected towards the development of infrastructure facili-
ties of water, energy and waste management will have an
impact on cost savings and increase environmental qual-
ity and comfort for the occupants of the region.
REFERENCES
Akbar I. (2014) Design of Cooling System Solar Thermal
Power 250 KW, Thesis (Master Degree), Gadjah Mada
University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, [in Indonesian].
Andersen, M. M. (2006) Eco-Innovation Indicator, European
Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Arsyad, S. (2000) Water and Soil Conservation, IPB Press
Publisher, Bogor, Indonesia, pp. 90-96.
Eicker, U., and Pietruschka, D. (2009) “Optimisation and Eco-
nomics of Solar Cooling Systems, University of Applied
Sciences Stuttgart,” Advances in building energy re-
search 3(1): 45-81.
Green Building Council of Indonesia. (2012) “Guidance of
Implementation of Greenship,” accessed July 14, 2014,
www.gbciindonesia.org, [in Indonesian].
OECD (2009) Eco-innovation: Framework, Practices and
Measurement (Synthesis Report), Sustainable Manufac-
turing, OECD, Paris, pp.13.
Republic of Indonesia. (1960) Law No. 5, 1960 on Basic
Rules of Agrarian, State gazette no. 104/1960, Jakarta,
Indonesia, [in Indonesian].
Sarkar, A. N. (2013) “Promoting Eco-Innovations to Leverage
Sustainable Development of Eco-industry and Green
Growth,” European Journal of Sustainable Develop-
ment 2(1) :171-224.
Sakr, D., Baas, L., El-Haggar, S., and Huisingh, D. (2011) “Crit-
ical success and limiting factors for eco-industrial parks:-
global trends and Egyptian context,” Journal Clean
Production 19(11): 1158-1169.
Tian, J., Liu, W., Lai, B., Li, X., and Chen, L. (2013) “Study of the
performance of eco-industrial park development in
China,” Journal of Cleaner Production xxx (2013): 1-9.
Zaenuri, M. (2009) Environmental Management of Industry
Model Through Eco-Efficiency Samongan Industrial
Park in Semarang City, Report of Research Insentif of
Doctoral Program 2009, Dipenogoro University, Sema-
rang, Indonesia, [in Indonesian].
96 2014 Copyright©World Technopolis Association
WTR 2014;3:89-96 http://dx.doi.org/10.7165/wtr2014.3.2.89