id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_hvck4r72qbbx5n6qn5mjmy2cxi	D. B. Krupp	Social evolution in the shadow of asymmetrical relatedness	2015	6	.pdf	application/pdf	5678	811	66	structure of the population—that is, on actors' genetic relationships to recipients and to the 'neighbourhood' upon which the effects of their actions partners evolves more easily among native than migrant actors. In deme A, relatedness between the native and migrant partners is symmetrical. relatedness is the same from the native actor/migrant recipient perspective native and migrant partners in two different neighbourhoods. case, these are the offspring, native and migrant, who will be competing for the next-generation breeding spots on that deme. migrant and 1 – q native offspring, the inclusive fitness effects Evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) conditions for social interactions on a deme of size K when partner identity is known and there is no budding native and migrant actors when interacting with partners of the same CC (B, C ) pair for a native differs from that for a migrant when interacting with a partner of the same CC. migrant actors are interacting with partners of the same	./cache/work_hvck4r72qbbx5n6qn5mjmy2cxi.pdf	./txt/work_hvck4r72qbbx5n6qn5mjmy2cxi.txt