id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_kecso2bwn5dyti5ci7ejoeioga	Antti Kauppinen	Hate and Punishment	2014	24	.pdf	application/pdf	8231	490	61	I'll also distinguish between two ways of expressing attitudes: enactment and symbolic How can expressing such attitudes justify enhanced punishment? discussing appeal to a special kind of harm caused by hate crime and expressing attitudes in In response, the right kind of hate crime legislation reaffirms the equality of all good to appeal to greater conventional harm to justify enhanced punishment for hate crime. definition does not by itself say what makes expression of inappropriate attitudes a nonpsychological harm for a person. 4) Hence, actions that express attitudes can harm a person via changing the relationships Pildes don't say, but their example, not of hate crime but of expressive harm of state action, So on this view, the expressive harm of hate crime, independently of its psychological effect (objectively) expresses bad attitude or wrong valuation.3 Someone who performs a hateful On the Expressive Wrongdoing view, what makes something a crime is that it enacts 	./cache/work_kecso2bwn5dyti5ci7ejoeioga.pdf	./txt/work_kecso2bwn5dyti5ci7ejoeioga.txt