id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_tgt5ez4lpjde5cb6lnhefoxnqm	Alexander Brown	The "Who?" Question in the Hate Speech Debate: Part 1: Consistency, Practical, and Formal Approaches	2016	46	.pdf	application/pdf	27303	1793	61	and Immigration Act 20084 extended this body of law still further to create another new offence of stirring up hatred on grounds of sexual orientation. There are numerous characteristics, social identities or statuses that either currently are or conceivably could be brought under the scope of hate speech laws.5 These include: · laws that ban stirring up, inciting, or promoting feelings of hatred or hostility toward or among members of groups or classes of persons based on on grounds of parity (treating like groups alike) for extending existing incitement to hatred laws so that they covered Muslims. One practical rationale for favouring (i) over (iii) might be that a new stirring up religious hatred offence is needed not so much for cases where prosecutors and courts reasonably believe for incitement to hatred laws to protect groups of people with characteristics c1, 	./cache/work_tgt5ez4lpjde5cb6lnhefoxnqm.pdf	./txt/work_tgt5ez4lpjde5cb6lnhefoxnqm.txt