Alvin Plantinga - Wikipedia Alvin Plantinga From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search American Christian philosopher Alvin Plantinga Born Alvin Carl Plantinga (1932-11-15) November 15, 1932 (age 88) Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S. Alma mater Calvin University University of Michigan Yale University Notable work God and Other Minds (1967) Warranted Christian Belief (2000) Spouse(s) Kathleen De Boer ​ (m. 1955)​ Awards Rescher Prize (2012) Templeton Prize (2017) Era 20th-century philosophy Region Western philosophy School Analytic Institutions Wayne State University Calvin University University of Notre Dame Doctoral advisor Paul Weiss Main interests Epistemology metaphysics philosophy of religion logic modal logic philosophy of science natural theology Notable ideas Reformed epistemology Free-will defense Modal ontological argument Proper functionalism Evolutionary argument against naturalism Warrant Modal metaphysics Divine nature and attributes Internalism and externalism Influences Immanuel Kant Bertrand Russell Ludwig Wittgenstein John Locke[1] Thomas Reid Edmund Burke Thomas Aquinas Thomas More Abraham Kuyper Luis de Molina Duns Scotus John Calvin William Harry Jellema William Alston Augustine of Hippo Hilaire Belloc John Henry Newman Søren Kierkegaard Influenced Nicholas Wolterstorff Peter van Inwagen William Lane Craig Michael Rea Robin Collins Keith DeRose Robert Koons Trenton Merricks Michael Bergmann Brian Davies J. P. Moreland Dallas Willard John Frame Michael Horton Alvin Carl Plantinga[a] (born 1932) is an American analytic philosopher who works primarily in the fields of philosophy of religion, epistemology (particularly on issues involving epistemic justification), and logic. From 1963 to 1982, Plantinga taught at Calvin University before accepting an appointment as the John A. O'Brien Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame.[3] He later returned to Calvin University to become the inaugural holder of the Jellema Chair in Philosophy.[4] A prominent Christian philosopher, Plantinga served as president of the Society of Christian Philosophers from 1983 to 1986. He has delivered the Gifford Lectures two times and was described by Time magazine as "America's leading orthodox Protestant philosopher of God".[5] William Lane Craig wrote in his work Reasonable Faith that he considers Plantinga to be the greatest Christian philosopher alive.[6] In 2014, Plantinga was the 30th most-cited contemporary author in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.[7] A fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, he was awarded the Templeton Prize in 2017.[8] Some of Plantinga's most influential works include God and Other Minds (1967), The Nature of Necessity (1974), and a trilogy of books on epistemology, culminating in Warranted Christian Belief (2000) that was simplified in Knowledge and Christian Belief (2015).[citation needed] Contents 1 Biography 1.1 Family 1.2 Education 1.3 Teaching career 1.4 Awards and honors 2 Philosophical views 2.1 Problem of evil 2.2 Reformed epistemology 2.3 Modal ontological argument 2.4 Evolutionary argument against naturalism 2.5 View on naturalism and evolution 3 Selected works by Plantinga 4 See also 5 Notes 6 References 6.1 Footnotes 6.2 Bibliography 7 Further reading 8 External links Biography[edit] Family[edit] Plantinga was born on November 15, 1932, in Ann Arbor, Michigan, to Cornelius A. Plantinga (1908–1994) and Lettie G. Bossenbroek (1908–2007). Plantinga's father was a first-generation immigrant, born in the Netherlands.[9] His family is from the Dutch province of Friesland, they lived on a relatively low income until he secured a teaching job in Michigan in 1941.[10] Plantinga's father earned a PhD in philosophy from Duke University and a master's degree in psychology, and taught several academic subjects at different colleges over the years.[11] Plantinga married Kathleen De Boer in 1955.[12] They have four children: Carl, Jane, Harry, and Ann.[13][14] Both of his sons are professors at Calvin University, Carl in Film Studies[15] and Harry in computer science.[16] Harry is also the director of the college's Christian Classics Ethereal Library. Plantinga's older daughter, Jane Plantinga Pauw, is a pastor at Rainier Beach Presbyterian Church (PCUSA) in Seattle, Washington,[17] and his younger daughter, Ann Kapteyn, is a missionary in Cameroon working for Wycliffe Bible Translators.[18] One of Plantinga's brothers, Cornelius "Neal" Plantinga Jr., is a theologian and the former president of Calvin Theological Seminary. Another of his brothers, Leon, is an emeritus professor of musicology at Yale University.[11][19] His brother Terrell worked for CBS News.[20] Education[edit] After Plantinga completed 11th grade, his father urged him to skip his last year of high school and immediately enroll in college. Plantinga reluctantly followed his father's advice and in 1949, a few months before his 17th birthday, he enrolled in Jamestown College, in Jamestown, North Dakota.[21][22] During that same year, his father accepted a teaching job at Calvin University, in Grand Rapids, Michigan. In January 1950, Plantinga moved to Grand Rapids with his family and enrolled in Calvin University. During his first semester at Calvin, Plantinga was awarded a scholarship to attend Harvard University.[23] Beginning in the fall of 1950, Plantinga spent two semesters at Harvard. In 1951, during Harvard's spring recess, Plantinga attended a few philosophy classes at Calvin University, and was so impressed with Calvin philosophy professor William Harry Jellema that he returned in 1951 to study philosophy under him.[24] In 1954, Plantinga began his graduate studies at the University of Michigan where he studied under William Alston, William Frankena, and Richard Cartwright, among others.[25] A year later, in 1955, he transferred to Yale University where he received his PhD in 1958.[26] Teaching career[edit] Plantinga at the University of Notre Dame in 2004 Plantinga began his career as an instructor in the philosophy department at Yale in 1957, and then in 1958, he became a professor of philosophy at Wayne State University during its heyday as a major center for analytic philosophy. In 1963, he accepted a teaching job at Calvin University, where he replaced the retiring Jellema.[27] He then spent the next 19 years at Calvin before moving to the University of Notre Dame in 1982. He retired from the University of Notre Dame in 2010 and returned to Calvin University, where he serves as the first holder of the William Harry Jellema Chair in Philosophy. He has trained many prominent philosophers working in metaphysics and epistemology including Michael Bergmann at Purdue and Michael Rea at Notre Dame, and Trenton Merricks working at University of Virginia. Awards and honors[edit] Plantinga served as president of the American Philosophical Association, Western Division, from 1981 to 1982.[28] and as President of the Society of Christian Philosophers from 1983 to 1986.[22][29] He has honorary degrees from Glasgow University (1982), Calvin University (1986), North Park College (1994), the Free University of Amsterdam (1995), Brigham Young University (1996), and Valparaiso University (1999).[29] He was a Guggenheim Fellow, 1971–72, and elected a Fellow in the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1975.[29] In 2006, the University of Notre Dame's Center for Philosophy of Religion renamed its Distinguished Scholar Fellowship as the Alvin Plantinga Fellowship.[30] The fellowship includes an annual lecture by the current Plantinga Fellow.[31] In 2012, the University of Pittsburgh's Philosophy Department, History and Philosophy of Science Department, and the Center for the History and Philosophy of Science co-awarded Plantinga the Nicholas Rescher Prize for Systematic Philosophy,[32] which he received with a talk titled, "Religion and Science: Where the Conflict Really Lies". In 2017, Baylor University's Center for Christian Philosophy inaugurated the Alvin Plantinga Award for Excellence in Christian Philosophy. Awardees deliver a lecture at Baylor University and their name is put on a plaque with Plantinga's image in the Institute for Studies in Religion. He was named the first fellow of the center as well.[33] He was awarded the 2017 Templeton Prize. Philosophical views[edit] Plantinga has argued that some people can know that God exists as a basic belief, requiring no argument. He developed this argument in two different fashions: firstly, in God and Other Minds (1967), by drawing an equivalence between the teleological argument and the common sense view that people have of other minds existing by analogy with their own minds.[34][35] Plantinga has also developed a more comprehensive epistemological account of the nature of warrant which allows for the existence of God as a basic belief.[36] Plantinga has also argued that there is no logical inconsistency between the existence of evil and the existence of an all-powerful, all-knowing, wholly good God.[37] Problem of evil[edit] Main article: Alvin Plantinga's free-will defense Plantinga proposed a "free-will defense" in a volume edited by Max Black in 1965,[38] which attempts to refute the logical problem of evil, the argument that the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, wholly good God.[39] Plantinga's argument (in a truncated form) states that "It is possible that God, even being omnipotent, could not create a world with free creatures who never choose evil. Furthermore, it is possible that God, even being omnibenevolent, would desire to create a world which contains evil if moral goodness requires free moral creatures."[40] However, the argument's handling of natural evil has been disputed. According to the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, the argument also "conflicts with important theistic doctrines",[clarification needed] including the notion of heaven and the idea that God has free will.[41] J. L. Mackie sees Plantinga's free-will defense as incoherent.[42] Plantinga's well-received book God, Freedom and Evil, written in 1974, gave his response to what he saw as the incomplete and uncritical view of theism's criticism of theodicy. Plantinga's contribution stated that when the issue of a comprehensive doctrine of freedom is added to the discussion of the goodness of God and the omnipotence of God then it is not possible to exclude the presence of evil in the world after introducing freedom into the discussion. Plantinga's own summary occurs in his discussion titled "Could God Have Created a World Containing Moral Good but No Moral Evil", where he states his conclusion that, "... the price for creating a world in which they produce moral good is creating one in which they also produce moral evil."[43] Reformed epistemology[edit] Main article: Reformed epistemology Plantinga giving a lecture on science and religion in 2009 Plantinga's contributions to epistemology include an argument which he dubs "Reformed epistemology". According to Reformed epistemology, belief in God can be rational and justified even without arguments or evidence for the existence of God. More specifically, Plantinga argues that belief in God is properly basic, and due to a religious externalist epistemology, he claims belief in God could be justified independently of evidence. His externalist epistemology, called "proper functionalism", is a form of epistemological reliabilism. Plantinga discusses his view of Reformed epistemology and proper functionalism in a three-volume series. In the first book of the trilogy, Warrant: The Current Debate, Plantinga introduces, analyzes, and criticizes 20th-century developments in analytic epistemology, particularly the works of Chisholm, BonJour, Alston, Goldman, and others.[44] In the book, Plantinga argues specifically that the theories of what he calls "warrant"-what many others have called justification (Plantinga draws out a difference: justification is a property of a person holding a belief while warrant is a property of a belief)—put forth by these epistemologists have systematically failed to capture in full what is required for knowledge.[45] In the second book, Warrant and Proper Function, he introduces the notion of warrant as an alternative to justification and discusses topics like self-knowledge, memories, perception, and probability.[46] Plantinga's "proper function" account argues that as a necessary condition of having warrant, one's "belief-forming and belief-maintaining apparatus of powers" are functioning properly—"working the way it ought to work".[47] Plantinga explains his argument for proper function with reference to a "design plan", as well as an environment in which one's cognitive equipment is optimal for use. Plantinga asserts that the design plan does not require a designer: "it is perhaps possible that evolution (undirected by God or anyone else) has somehow furnished us with our design plans",[48] but the paradigm case of a design plan is like a technological product designed by a human being (like a radio or a wheel). Ultimately, Plantinga argues that epistemological naturalism- i.e. epistemology that holds that warrant is dependent on natural faculties—is best supported by supernaturalist metaphysics—in this case, the belief in a creator God or designer who has laid out a design plan that includes cognitive faculties conducive to attaining knowledge.[49] According to Plantinga, a belief, B, is warranted if: (1) the cognitive faculties involved in the production of B are functioning properly…; (2) your cognitive environment is sufficiently similar to the one for which your cognitive faculties are designed; (3) … the design plan governing the production of the belief in question involves, as purpose or function, the production of true beliefs…; and (4) the design plan is a good one: that is, there is a high statistical or objective probability that a belief produced in accordance with the relevant segment of the design plan in that sort of environment is true.[50] Plantinga seeks to defend this view of proper function against alternative views of proper function proposed by other philosophers which he groups together as "naturalistic", including the "functional generalization" view of John Pollock, the evolutionary/etiological account provided by Ruth Millikan, and a dispositional view held by John Bigelow and Robert Pargetter.[51] Plantinga also discusses his evolutionary argument against naturalism in the later chapters of Warrant and Proper Function.[52] In 2000, the third book of the trilogy, Warranted Christian Belief, was published. In this volume, Plantinga's warrant theory is the basis for his theological end: providing a philosophical basis for Christian belief, an argument for why Christian theistic belief can enjoy warrant. In the book, he develops two models for such beliefs, the "A/C" (Aquinas/Calvin) model, and the "Extended A/C" model. The former attempts to show that a belief in God can be justified, warranted and rational, while the Extended model tries to show that specifically Christian theological beliefs including the Trinity, the Incarnation, the resurrection of Christ, the atonement, salvation etc. Under this model, Christians are justified in their beliefs because of the work of the Holy Spirit in bringing those beliefs about in the believer. James Beilby has argued that the purpose of Plantinga's Warrant trilogy, and specifically of his Warranted Christian Belief, is firstly to make a form of argument against religion impossible—namely, the argument that whether or not Christianity is true, it is irrational—so "the skeptic would have to shoulder the formidable task of demonstrating the falsity of Christian belief"[53] rather than simply dismiss it as irrational. In addition, Plantinga is attempting to provide a philosophical explanation of how Christians should think about their own Christian belief. Modal ontological argument[edit] Plantinga has expressed a modal logic version of the ontological argument in which he uses modal logic to develop, in a more rigorous and formal way, Norman Malcolm's and Charles Hartshorne's modal ontological arguments. Plantinga criticized Malcolm's and Hartshorne's arguments, and offered an alternative.[54] He argued that, if Malcolm does prove the necessary existence of the greatest possible being, it follows that there is a being which exists in all worlds whose greatness in some worlds is not surpassed. It does not, he argued, demonstrate that such a being has unsurpassed greatness in this world.[55] In an attempt to resolve this problem, Plantinga differentiated between "greatness" and "excellence". A being's excellence in a particular world depends only on its properties in that world; a being's greatness depends on its properties in all worlds. Therefore, the greatest possible being must have maximal excellence in every possible world. Plantinga then restated Malcolm's argument, using the concept of "maximal greatness". He argued that it is possible for a being with maximal greatness to exist, so a being with maximal greatness exists in a possible world. If this is the case, then a being with maximal greatness exists in every world, and therefore in this world.[55] The conclusion relies on a form of modal axiom S5, which states that if something is possibly true, then its possibility is necessary (it is possibly true in all worlds). Plantinga's version of S5 suggests that "To say that p is possibly necessarily true is to say that, with regard to one world, it is true at all worlds; but in that case it is true at all worlds, and so it is simply necessary."[56] A version of his argument is as follows:[57] A being has maximal excellence in a given possible world W if and only if it is omnipotent, omniscient and wholly good in W; and A being has maximal greatness if it has maximal excellence in every possible world. It is possible that there is a being that has maximal greatness. (Premise) Therefore, possibly, it is necessarily true that an omniscient, omnipotent, and perfectly good being exists. Therefore, (by axiom S5) it is necessarily true that an omniscient, omnipotent and perfectly good being exists. Therefore, an omniscient, omnipotent and perfectly good being exists. Plantinga argued that, although the first premise is not rationally established, it is not contrary to reason. Michael Martin argued that, if certain components of perfection are contradictory, such as omnipotence and omniscience, then the first premise is contrary to reason. Martin also proposed parodies of the argument, suggesting that the existence of anything can be demonstrated with Plantinga's argument, provided it is defined as perfect or special in every possible world.[58] Another Christian apologist, William Lane Craig, characterizes Plantinga's argument in a slightly different way: It is possible that a maximally great being exists. If it is possible that a maximally great being exists, then a maximally great being exists in some possible world. If a maximally great being exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world. If a maximally great being exists in every possible world, then it exists in the actual world. If a maximally great being exists in the actual world, then a maximally great being exists. Therefore, a maximally great being exists. According to Craig, premises (2)–(5) are relatively uncontroversial among philosophers, but "the epistemic entertainability of premise (1) (or its denial) does not guarantee its metaphysical possibility."[59] Furthermore, Richard M. Gale argued that premise three, the "possibility premise", begs the question. He stated that one only has the epistemic right to accept the premise if one understands the nested modal operators, and that if one understands them within the system S5—without which the argument fails—then one understands that "possibly necessarily" is in essence the same as "necessarily".[60] Thus the premise begs the question because the conclusion is embedded within it. On S5 systems in general, James Garson writes that "the words 'necessarily' and 'possibly', have many different uses. So the acceptability of axioms for modal logic depends on which of these uses we have in mind."[61] Evolutionary argument against naturalism[edit] Main article: Evolutionary argument against naturalism In Plantinga's evolutionary argument against naturalism, he argues that if evolution is true, it undermines naturalism. His basic argument is that if evolution and naturalism are both true, human cognitive faculties evolved to produce beliefs that have survival value (maximizing one's success at the four Fs: "feeding, fleeing, fighting, and reproducing"), not necessarily to produce beliefs that are true. Thus, since human cognitive faculties are tuned to survival rather than truth in the naturalism-evolution model, there is reason to doubt the veracity of the products of those same faculties, including naturalism and evolution themselves. On the other hand, if God created man "in his image" by way of an evolutionary process (or any other means), then Plantinga argues our faculties would probably be reliable. The argument does not assume any necessary correlation (or uncorrelation) between true beliefs and survival. Making the contrary assumption—that there is, in fact, a relatively strong correlation between truth and survival—if human belief-forming apparatus evolved giving a survival advantage, then it ought to yield truth since true beliefs confer a survival advantage. Plantinga counters that, while there may be overlap between true beliefs and beliefs that contribute to survival, the two kinds of beliefs are not the same, and he gives the following example with a man named Paul: Perhaps Paul very much likes the idea of being eaten, but when he sees a tiger, always runs off looking for a better prospect, because he thinks it unlikely the tiger he sees will eat him. This will get his body parts in the right place so far as survival is concerned, without involving much by way of true belief... Or perhaps he thinks the tiger is a large, friendly, cuddly pussycat and wants to pet it; but he also believes that the best way to pet it is to run away from it... Clearly there are any number of belief-desire systems that equally fit a given bit of behaviour.[62] The argument has received favorable notice from Thomas Nagel[63] and William Lane Craig,[64] but has also been criticized as seriously flawed, for example, by Elliott Sober.[65][66] View on naturalism and evolution[edit] Even though Alvin Plantinga believes that God could have used Darwinian processes to create the world, he stands firm against philosophical naturalism. He said in an interview on the relationship between science and religion that: Religion and science share more common ground than you might think, though science can't prove, it presupposes that there has been a past for example, science does not cover the whole of the knowledge enterprise.[67] Plantinga participated of groups that support the Intelligent Design Movement, and was a member of the 'Ad Hoc Origins Committee'[68] that supported Philip E. Johnson's 1991 book Darwin on Trial, he also provided a back-cover endorsement of Johnson's book: "Shows how Darwinian evolution has become an idol."[69] He was a Fellow of the (now moribund) pro-intelligent design International Society for Complexity, Information, and Design,[70] and has presented at a number of intelligent design conferences.[71] In a March 2010 article in The Chronicle of Higher Education, philosopher of science Michael Ruse labeled Plantinga as an "open enthusiast of intelligent design".[72] In a letter to the editor, Plantinga made the following response: Like any Christian (and indeed any theist), I believe that the world has been created by God, and hence "intelligently designed". The hallmark of intelligent design, however, is the claim that this can be shown scientifically; I'm dubious about that. ...As far as I can see, God certainly could have used Darwinian processes to create the living world and direct it as he wanted to go; hence evolution as such does not imply that there is no direction in the history of life. What does have that implication is not evolutionary theory itself, but unguided evolution, the idea that neither God nor any other person has taken a hand in guiding, directing or orchestrating the course of evolution. But the scientific theory of evolution, sensibly enough, says nothing one way or the other about divine guidance. It doesn't say that evolution is divinely guided; it also doesn't say that it isn't. Like almost any theist, I reject unguided evolution; but the contemporary scientific theory of evolution just as such—apart from philosophical or theological add-ons—doesn't say that evolution is unguided. Like science in general, it makes no pronouncements on the existence or activity of God.[73] The attitude that he proposes and elaborates upon in Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion and Naturalism is that there is no tension between religion and science, that the two go hand in hand, and that the actual conflict lies between naturalism and science.[74] Selected works by Plantinga[edit] God and Other Minds. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1967. rev. ed., 1990. ISBN 0-8014-9735-3 The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1974. ISBN 0-19-824404-5 God, Freedom, and Evil. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. 1974. ISBN 0-04-100040-4 Does God Have A Nature? Wisconsin: Marquette University Press. 1980. ISBN 0-87462-145-3 Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God (ed. with Nicholas Wolterstorff). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. 1983. ISBN 0-268-00964-3 Warrant: The Current Debate. New York: Oxford University Press. 1993. ISBN 0-19-507861-6 Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1993. ISBN 0-19-507863-2 Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press. 2000. ISBN 0-19-513192-4 online Essays in the Metaphysics of Modality. Matthew Davidson (ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. 2003. ISBN 0-19-510376-9 Knowledge of God (with Michael Tooley). Oxford: Blackwell. 2008. ISBN 0-631-19364-2 Science and Religion (with Daniel Dennett). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2010 ISBN 0-19-973842-4 Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2011. ISBN 0-19-981209-8 Knowledge and Christian Belief. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. 2015. ISBN 0802872042 See also[edit] Philosophy portal American philosophy List of American philosophers Notes[edit] ^ Pronounced /ˈplæntɪŋɡə/.[2] References[edit] Footnotes[edit] ^ Alvin Plantinga, Knowledge and Christian Belief (2015), p. 54. ^ Christian, Evolutionist, or Both? on YouTube ^ "Alvin Plantinga". veritas-ucsb.org. ^ "Plantinga Wins Prestigious Rescher Prize". calvin.edu. ^ "Emeritae and Emeriti // Department of Philosophy // University of Notre Dame". Archived from the original on 2013-08-31. ^ Reasonable Faith. Wheaton: Crossway. 1994. rev. 3rd ed. 2008. ISBN 0-89107-764-2/ ISBN 978-0-89107-764-0 ^ "The 267 Most-Cited Contemporary Authors in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy". Retrieved 2020-06-27. ^ "Templeton Prize – Current Winner". templetonprize.org. Archived from the original on 2009-03-19. Retrieved 2017-07-27. ^ "Self-profile", p. 3. ^ "Alvin Plantinga". The Gifford Lectures. 2014-08-18. ^ a b "Self-profile", p. 6. ^ "Self-profile", p. 14. ^ "Introduction: Alvin Plantinga, God's Philosopher" in Alvin Plantinga; Deane-Peter Baker ed., (New York: Cambridge University Press), 2007, p. 5. ^ "Alvin Plantinga" Archived 2008-07-04 at the Wayback Machine, Well-Known Dutch-Americans at The New Netherland Institute website. Retrieved November 6, 2007. ^ "Faculty & Staff". Calvin University. Retrieved 7 April 2016. ^ "CCEL Questions and Answers". Archived from the original on 2008-07-25. ^ "Jane Plantinga Pauw". Archived from the original on July 15, 2011. ^ "REACHING OUT • Missions". Archived from the original on 2011-07-13. ^ "Welcome". Retrieved April 7, 2016. ^ "Self-profile", p. 7. ^ "Self-profile", pp. 7–8. ^ a b Deane-Peter Baker (2007). Alvin Plantinga. Cambridge University Press. pp. 2–8. ISBN 978-0-521-85531-0. Retrieved 16 December 2010. ^ "Self-profile", p. 8. ^ "Self-profile", pp. 9–16. ^ "Self-profile", p. 16. ^ "Self-profile", pp. 21–22. ^ "Self-profile", p. 30. ^ "APA Presidents". Archived from the original on April 26, 2012. ^ a b c "NNP, The Casino News Network". nnp.org. Archived from the original on July 4, 2008. ^ AgencyND : University of Notre Dame. "Events". Retrieved April 7, 2016. ^ Agency ND : University of Notre Dame. "Center for Philosophy of Religion". Retrieved April 7, 2016. ^ University of Pittsburgh University Marketing Communications Webteam. "Nicholas Rescher Prize for Systematic Philosophy". Retrieved April 7, 2016. ^ "Philosophy department, Baylor ISR and major granting organization cooperate in opening Baylor Center for Christian Philosophy | Baylor Institute for Studies of Religion". www.baylorisr.org. Retrieved 2017-10-16. ^ Felder, D. W. (1971). "Disanalogies in Plantinga's Argument regarding the Rationality of Theism". Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 10 (3): 200–207. doi:10.2307/1384479. JSTOR 1384479. ^ Friquegnon, M. L. (1979). "God and Other Programs". Religious Studies. 15 (1): 83–89. doi:10.1017/S0034412500011100. ^ Copan, P. (2001). "Warranted Christian Belief". The Review of Metaphysics. 54 (4): 939–941. JSTOR 20131647. ^ Quinn, Philip L. "Plantinga, Alvin" in Honderich, Ted (ed.). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 1995. ^ "Free Will Defense", in Max Black (ed), Philosophy in America. Ithaca: Cornell UP / London: Allen & Unwin, 1965 ^ Beebe 2005 ^ Meister 2009, p. 133 ^ "Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy". Retrieved July 16, 2012. ^ J. L. Mackie wrote: "[H]ow could there be logically contingent states of affairs, prior to the creation and existence of any created beings with free will, which an omnipotent god would have to accept and put up with? This suggestion is simply incoherent. Indeed, by bringing in the notion of individual essences which determine—presumably non-causally—how Curly Smith, Satan, and the rest of us would choose freely or would act in each hypothetical situation, Plantinga has not rescued the free will defence but made its weaknesses all too clear". Mackie 1982, p. 174. ^ Plantinga, Alvin (1974). God, Freedom and Evil, p. 49. ^ Alvin Plantinga, Warrant: The Current Debate, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. ^ Plantinga, Warrant: The Current Debate, 1993. 3. ^ Alvin Plantinga, Warrant and Proper Function, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. ^ WPF, p. 4 ^ WPF, p. 21 ^ WPF, 237. ^ Plantinga, Warrant and Proper Function, 1993. 194. ^ WPF, p. 199-211. ^ Fales, E. (1996). "Plantinga's Case against Naturalistic Epistemology". Philosophy of Science. 63 (3): 432–451. doi:10.1086/289920. S2CID 170510977. ^ Beilby, James (2007). "Plantinga's Model of Warranted Christian Belief". In Baker, Deane-Peter (ed.). Alvin Plantinga. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 125–165. ISBN 978-0-521-67143-9. ^ "Evolution, Shibboleths, and Philosophers". The Chronicle of Higher Education. April 11, 2010. Retrieved 2010-04-28. Like any Christian (and indeed any theist), I believe that the world has been created by God, and hence "intelligently designed" ^ a b Plantinga, Alvin (1998). Sennett, James F. (ed.). The Analytic Theist: An Alvin Plantinga Reader. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 65–71. ISBN 978-0-8028-4229-9. ^ Marenbon, John (October 2, 2006). Medieval Philosophy: An Historical and Philosophical Introduction. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-46183-7 – via Google Books. ^ Oppy, Graham (8 February 1996). "Ontological Arguments". substantive revision 15 July 2011. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ^ Martin, Michael (2003). Philosophy of religion: an anthology. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 282–293. ISBN 978-0-631-21471-7. ^ Craig, William Lane (2008). Reasonable faith. Crossway. p. 185. ISBN 978-1-4335-0115-9. Premises (2)–(5) of this argument are relatively uncontroversial. Most philosophers would agree that if God's existence is even possible, then he must exist. ... the epistemic entertainability of premise (1) (or its denial) does not guarantee its metaphysical possibility. ^ Gale, Richard (1993). On the Nature and Existence of God. Cambridge University Press. p. 227. ISBN 0-521-45723-8. ^ Garson, James (February 29, 2000). "Modal Logic" – via plato.stanford.edu. ^ Plantinga, Alvin Warrant and Proper Function, (New York: Oxford University Press), 1993. pp. 225–226 ( ISBN 978-0-19-507864-0). ^ Nagel, Thomas (27 September 2012). "A Philosopher Defends Religion". The New York Review of Books. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2017-08-04.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) ^ Oppy, Graham; Trakakis, N. N. (2014-09-11). Twentieth-Century Philosophy of Religion: The History of Western Philosophy of Religion. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-54638-2. ^ Fitelson, Branden; Sober, Elliott (1998). "Plantinga's Probability Arguments Against Evolutionary Naturalism". Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 79 (2): 115–129. doi:10.1111/1468-0114.00053. ^ "Exploring The Real 'Conflict': Science Vs. Naturalism". ^ "Notre Dame philosopher Alvin Plantinga has also signed this letter" – We're Not in Kansas Anymore, Nancy Pearcey, Christianity Today, May 22, 2000, cited in Forrest & Gross 2004, p. 18 "Alvin Plantinga was also a signatory to this letter, early evidence of his continuing support of the intelligent design movement" – Intelligent design creationism and its critics, Robert T. Pennock (ed), 2001, p44 ^ Darwin on Trial back cover ^ ICSD list of Fellows Archived 2013-01-16 at the Wayback Machine but note that this site appears not to have been updated since 2005 ^ Forrest & Gross 2004, pp. 156, 191, 212, 269 ^ "Philosophers Rip Darwin". The Chronicle of Higher Education. March 7, 2010. Retrieved 2010-04-28. ^ "Evolution, Shibboleths, and Philosophers". The Chronicle of Higher Education. April 11, 2010. Retrieved 2010-04-28. ^ "Where the Conflict Really Lies" – via YouTube. Bibliography[edit] "Self-profile" in Alvin Plantinga, James Tomberlin and Peter van Inwagen ed., (Dordrecht: D. Riedle Pub. Co.), 1985 Beebe, James R. (July 12, 2005). "Logical Problem of Evil". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved September 21, 2009. Forrest, Barbara; Gross, Paul R. (8 January 2004). Creationism's Trojan Horse. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-515742-7. Mackie, J.L (1982). The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and Against the Existence of God. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-824682-X. Meister, Chad (2009). Introducing Philosophy of Religion. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-40327-6. Peterson, Michael; Hasker, William; Reichenbach, Bruce; Basinger, David (1991). Reason and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-506155-1. Further reading[edit] Schönecker, Dieter (ed.), Essays on "Warranted Christian Belief". With Replies by Alvin Plantinga. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin 2015. Baker, Deane-Peter (ed), Alvin Plantinga (Contemporary Philosophy in Focus Series). New York: Cambridge University Press. 2007. Mascrod, Keith, Alvin Plantinga and Christian Apologetics. Wipf & Stock. 2007. Crisp, Thomas, Matthew Davidson, David Vander Laan (eds), Knowledge and Reality: Essays in Honor of Alvin Plantinga. Dordrecht: Springer. 2006. Beilby, James, Epistemology as Theology: An Evaluation of Alvin Plantinga's Religious Epistemology. Aldershot: Ashgate. 2005 Beilby, James (ed), Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 2002. Sennet, James (ed), The Analytic Theist: An Alvin Plantinga Reader. Grand Rapids: Eeardman. 1998. ISBN 0-8028-4229-1 Kvanvig, Jonathan (ed), Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology: Essays in Honor of Plantinga's Theory of Knowledge. Savage, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. 1996. McLeod, Mark S. Rationality and Theistic Belief: An Essay on Reformed Epistemology (Cornell Studies in the Philosophy of Religion). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1993. Zagzebski, Linda (ed), Rational Faith. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. 1993. Sennett, James, Modality, Probability, and Rationality: A Critical Examination of Alvin Plantinga's Philosophy. New York: P. Lang. 1992. Hoitenga, Dewey, From Plato to Plantinga: An Introduction to Reformed Epistemology. Albany: State University of New York Press. 1991. Parsons, Keith, God and the Burden of Proof: Plantinga, Swinburne, and the Analytic Defense of Theism. Buffalo, New York: Prometheus Books. 1989. Tomberlin, James and Peter van Inwagen (eds), Alvin Plantinga (Profiles V.5). Dordrecht: D. Reidel. 1985. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Alvin Plantinga. Wikiquote has quotations related to: Alvin Plantinga Alvin Plantinga's faculty page at the University of Notre Dame Plantinga's Curriculum Vitae Virtual Library of Christian Philosophy a collection of some of Plantinga's papers Papers by Plantinga Extensive collection of online papers. Interviews from the PBS program Closer to Truth "The Dawkins Confusion", Plantinga's review of Richard Dawkins's The God Delusion from Books and Culture magazine Alvin Plantinga's spiritual autobiography from Philosophers Who Believe. Clark, Kelly James (InterVarsity Press,1993) Warrant: The Current Debate Plantinga's Gifford Lecture, and volume 1 of his Warrant trilogy. Warrant and Proper Function Plantinga's Gifford Lecture, and volume 2 of his Warrant trilogy. Warranted Christian Belief, full electronic text of volume 3 of his Warrant trilogy. Daniel C. Dennett and Alvin Plantinga, Science and Religion: Are They Compatible? (Oxford University Press, 2011) "Proper Functionalism". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Professional and academic associations Preceded by Alan Donagan President of the American Philosophical Association, Western Division 1981–1982 Succeeded by Manley H. Thompson Jr. Preceded by Robert Merrihew Adams President of the Society of Christian Philosophers 1983–1986 Succeeded by Marilyn McCord Adams Awards Preceded by Ernest Sosa Nicholas Rescher Prize for Systematic Philosophy 2012 With: Jürgen Mittelstraß Succeeded by Hilary Putnam Preceded by Jonathan Sacks Templeton Prize 2017 Succeeded by Abdullah II of Jordan v t e Analytic philosophy Related articles Areas of focus Epistemology Language Mathematics Science Turns Aretaic Linguistic Logic Classical Mathematical Non-classical Philosophical Theories Anti-realism Australian realism Descriptivist theory of names Emotivism Functionalism Analytical feminism Logical atomism Logical positivism Analytical Marxism Neopragmatism Neurophilosophy Ordinary language Quietism Scientific structuralism Sense data Concepts Analysis (paradox of analysis) Analytic–synthetic distinction Counterfactual Natural kind Reflective equilibrium Supervenience Modality Actualism Necessity Possibility Possible world Realism Rigid designator Philosophers Noam Chomsky Keith Donnellan Paul Feyerabend Gottlob Frege Ian Hacking Karl Popper Ernest Sosa Barry Stroud Michael Walzer Cambridge Charlie Broad Norman Malcolm G. E. Moore Graham Priest Bertrand Russell Frank P. Ramsey Ludwig Wittgenstein Oxford G. E. M. Anscombe J. L. Austin A. J. Ayer Michael Dummett Antony Flew Philippa Foot Peter Geach Paul Grice R. M. Hare Alasdair MacIntyre Derek Parfit Gilbert Ryle John Searle P. F. Strawson Richard Swinburne Charles Taylor Bernard Williams Timothy Williamson Logical positivists Ernest Nagel Berlin Circle Carl Gustav Hempel Hans Reichenbach Vienna Circle Rudolf Carnap Kurt Gödel Otto Neurath Moritz Schlick Harvard Roderick Chisholm Donald Davidson Daniel Dennett Nelson Goodman Christine Korsgaard Thomas Kuhn Thomas Nagel Robert Nozick Hilary Putnam W. V. O. Quine John Rawls Pittsburgh School Robert Brandom Patricia Churchland Paul Churchland Adolf Grünbaum John McDowell Ruth Millikan Nicholas Rescher Wilfrid Sellars Bas van Fraassen Princeton Jerry Fodor David Lewis Jaegwon Kim Saul Kripke Richard Rorty Notre Dame Robert Audi Peter van Inwagen Alvin Plantinga Australian David Chalmers J. L. Mackie Peter Singer J. J. C. Smart Quietism James F. Conant Alice Crary Cora Diamond Category Index v t e Metaphysics Metaphysicians Parmenides Plato Aristotle Plotinus Duns Scotus Thomas Aquinas Francisco Suárez Nicolas Malebranche René Descartes John Locke David Hume Thomas Reid Immanuel Kant Isaac Newton Arthur Schopenhauer Baruch Spinoza Georg W. F. Hegel George Berkeley Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Christian Wolff Bernard Bolzano Hermann Lotze Henri Bergson Friedrich Nietzsche Charles Sanders Peirce Joseph Maréchal Ludwig Wittgenstein Martin Heidegger Alfred N. Whitehead Bertrand Russell G. E. Moore Jean-Paul Sartre Gilbert Ryle Hilary Putnam P. F. Strawson R. G. Collingwood Rudolf Carnap Saul Kripke W. V. O. Quine G. E. M. Anscombe Donald Davidson Michael Dummett D. M. Armstrong David Lewis Alvin Plantinga Héctor-Neri Castañeda Peter van Inwagen Derek Parfit Alexius Meinong Ernst Mally Edward N. Zalta more ... Theories Abstract object theory Action theory Anti-realism Determinism Dualism Enactivism Essentialism Existentialism Free will Idealism Libertarianism Liberty Materialism Meaning of life Monism Naturalism Nihilism Phenomenalism Realism Physicalism Platonic idealism Relativism Scientific realism Solipsism Subjectivism Substance theory Truthmaker theory Type theory Concepts Abstract object Anima mundi Being Category of being Causality Causal closure Choice Cogito, ergo sum Concept Embodied cognition Essence Existence Experience Hypostatic abstraction Idea Identity Information Insight Intelligence Intention Linguistic modality Matter Meaning Memetics Mental representation Mind Motion Nature Necessity Notion Object Pattern Perception Physical object Principle Property Qualia Quality Reality Relation Soul Subject Substantial form Thought Time Truth Type–token distinction Universal Unobservable Value more ... Related topics Axiology Cosmology Epistemology Feminist metaphysics Interpretations of quantum mechanics Mereology Meta- Ontology Philosophy of mind Philosophy of psychology Philosophy of self Philosophy of space and time Teleology Theoretical physics Category  Philosophy portal v t e Epistemology Epistemologists Thomas Aquinas Augustine of Hippo William Alston Robert Audi A. J. Ayer George Berkeley Laurence BonJour Keith DeRose René Descartes John Dewey Fred Dretske Edmund Gettier Alvin Goldman Nelson Goodman Paul Grice Anil Gupta Susan Haack David Hume Immanuel Kant Søren Kierkegaard Peter Klein Saul Kripke Hilary Kornblith David Lewis John Locke G. E. Moore John McDowell Robert Nozick Alvin Plantinga Plato Duncan Pritchard James Pryor Hilary Putnam W. V. O. Quine Thomas Reid Bertrand Russell Gilbert Ryle Wilfrid Sellars Susanna Siegel Ernest Sosa P. F. Strawson Baruch Spinoza Timothy Williamson Ludwig Wittgenstein Nicholas Wolterstorff Vienna Circle more... Theories Coherentism Constructivism Contextualism Empiricism Evolutionary epistemology Fallibilism Feminist epistemology Fideism Foundationalism Holism Infinitism Innatism Naïve realism Naturalized epistemology Phenomenalism Positivism Rationalism Reductionism Reliabilism Representational realism Skepticism Transcendental idealism Concepts A priori knowledge A posteriori knowledge Analysis Analytic–synthetic distinction Belief Common sense Descriptive knowledge Exploratory thought Gettier problem Induction Internalism and externalism Justification Knowledge Objectivity Privileged access Problem of induction Problem of other minds Perception Procedural knowledge Proposition Regress argument Simplicity Speculative reason Truth more... Related articles Outline of epistemology Faith and rationality Formal epistemology Meta-epistemology Philosophy of perception Philosophy of science Social epistemology Category Task Force Stubs Discussion v t e Philosophy of religion Concepts in religion Afterlife Euthyphro dilemma Faith Intelligent design Miracle Problem of evil Religious belief Soul Spirit Theodicy Theological veto Conceptions of God Aristotelian view Brahman Demiurge Divine simplicity Egoism Holy Spirit Misotheism Pandeism Personal god Process theology Supreme Being Unmoved mover God in Abrahamic religions Buddhism Christianity Hinduism Islam Jainism Judaism Mormonism Sikhism Baháʼí Faith Wicca Existence of God For Beauty Christological Consciousness Cosmological Kalam Contingency Degree Desire Experience Fine-tuning of the universe Love Miracles Morality Necessary existent Ontological Pascal's wager Proper basis Reason Teleological Natural law Watchmaker analogy Transcendental Against 747 gambit Atheist's Wager Evil Free will Hell Inconsistent revelations Nonbelief Noncognitivism Occam's razor Omnipotence Poor design Russell's teapot Theology Acosmism Agnosticism Animism Antireligion Atheism Creationism Dharmism Deism Demonology Divine command theory Dualism Esotericism Exclusivism Existentialism Christian Agnostic Atheistic Feminist theology Thealogy Womanist theology Fideism Fundamentalism Gnosticism Henotheism Humanism Religious Secular Christian Inclusivism Theories about religions Monism Monotheism Mysticism Naturalism Metaphysical Religious Humanistic New Age Nondualism Nontheism Pandeism Panentheism Pantheism Perennialism Polytheism Possibilianism Process theology Religious skepticism Spiritualism Shamanism Taoic Theism Transcendentalism more... Religious language Eschatological verification Language game Logical positivism Apophatic theology Verificationism Problem of evil Augustinian theodicy Best of all possible worlds Euthyphro dilemma Inconsistent triad Irenaean theodicy Natural evil Theodicy Philosophers of religion (by date active) Ancient and medieval Anselm of Canterbury Augustine of Hippo Avicenna Averroes Boethius Erasmus Gaunilo of Marmoutiers Pico della Mirandola Heraclitus King James VI and I Marcion of Sinope Thomas Aquinas Maimonides Early modern Augustin Calmet René Descartes Blaise Pascal Baruch Spinoza Nicolas Malebranche Gottfried W Leibniz William Wollaston Thomas Chubb David Hume Baron d'Holbach Immanuel Kant Johann G Herder 1800 1850 Friedrich Schleiermacher Karl C F Krause Georg W F Hegel William Whewell Ludwig Feuerbach Søren Kierkegaard Karl Marx Albrecht Ritschl Afrikan Spir 1880 1900 Ernst Haeckel W K Clifford Friedrich Nietzsche Harald Høffding William James Vladimir Solovyov Ernst Troeltsch Rudolf Otto Lev Shestov Sergei Bulgakov Pavel Florensky Ernst Cassirer Joseph Maréchal 1920 postwar George Santayana Bertrand Russell Martin Buber René Guénon Paul Tillich Karl Barth Emil Brunner Rudolf Bultmann Gabriel Marcel Reinhold Niebuhr Charles Hartshorne Mircea Eliade Frithjof Schuon J L Mackie Walter Kaufmann Martin Lings Peter Geach George I Mavrodes William Alston Antony Flew 1970 1990 2010 William L Rowe Dewi Z Phillips Alvin Plantinga Anthony Kenny Nicholas Wolterstorff Richard Swinburne Robert Merrihew Adams Ravi Zacharias Peter van Inwagen Daniel Dennett Loyal Rue Jean-Luc Marion William Lane Craig Ali Akbar Rashad Alexander Pruss Related topics Criticism of religion Desacralization of knowledge Ethics in religion Exegesis History of religion Religion Religious language Religious philosophy Relationship between religion and science Faith and rationality more... Portal Category v t e Templeton Prize laureates 1970s Mother Teresa (1973) Brother Roger (1974) Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan (1975) Leo Josef Suenens (1976) Chiara Lubich (1977) Thomas F. Torrance (1978) Nikkyō Niwano (1979) 1980s Ralph Wendell Burhoe (1980) Cicely Saunders (1981) Billy Graham (1982) Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1983) Michael Bourdeaux (1984) Alister Hardy (1985) James I. McCord (1986) Stanley Jaki (1987) Inamullah Khan (1988) Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker & George MacLeod (1989) 1990s Baba Amte & Charles Birch (1990) Immanuel Jakobovits (1991) Kyung-Chik Han (1992) Charles Colson (1993) Michael Novak (1994) Paul Davies (1995) Bill Bright (1996) Pandurang Shastri Athavale (1997) Sigmund Sternberg (1998) Ian Barbour (1999) 2000s Freeman Dyson (2000) Arthur Peacocke (2001) John Polkinghorne (2002) Holmes Rolston III (2003) George F. R. Ellis (2004) Charles H. Townes (2005) John D. Barrow (2006) Charles Taylor (2007) Michał Heller (2008) Bernard d'Espagnat (2009) 2010s Francisco J. Ayala (2010) Martin Rees (2011) 14th Dalai Lama (2012) Desmond Tutu (2013) Tomáš Halík (2014) Jean Vanier (2015) Jonathan Sacks (2016) Alvin Plantinga (2017) Abdullah II of Jordan (2018) Marcelo Gleiser (2019) Francis Collins (2020) Authority control BNF: cb12003533h (data) CANTIC: a11070201 GND: 119153114 ISNI: 0000 0001 1030 011X LCCN: n50019906 NKC: jx20080725003 NLK: KAC201501278 NTA: 070635552 PLWABN: 9810605688105606 SELIBR: 357008 SNAC: w6wj53h8 SUDOC: 028142047 VIAF: 79040329 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n50019906 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alvin_Plantinga&oldid=995593097" Categories: 1932 births 20th-century American philosophers 20th-century theologians 21st-century American philosophers 21st-century theologians American Calvinist and Reformed Christians American members of the Christian Reformed Church in North America American people of Dutch descent American people of Frisian descent Analytic philosophers Calvin University alumni Calvin University faculty Calvinist and Reformed philosophers Christian apologists Critics of atheism Epistemologists Fellows of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences Fellows of the International Society for Complexity, Information, and Design Harvard University alumni Intelligent design advocates Living people Metaphysicians People from Ann Arbor, Michigan Philosophers from Michigan Philosophers of mind Philosophers of religion Presidents of the American Philosophical Association Presidents of the Society of Christian Philosophers Templeton Prize laureates University of Michigan alumni University of Notre Dame faculty Wayne State University faculty Hidden categories: Webarchive template wayback links CS1 maint: archived copy as title Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles with hCards All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from December 2017 Wikipedia articles needing clarification from August 2017 Commons category link from Wikidata Articles with Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy links Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with PLWABN identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Languages العربية Azərbaycanca Català Čeština Deutsch Eesti Español فارسی Français 한국어 Հայերեն Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano മലയാളം مصرى مازِرونی Nederlands Norsk bokmål Polski Português Română Русский Simple English Slovenščina Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 21 December 2020, at 22:15 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement