id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
12367	Ford, Kevin M	Seeing through Vocabularies	2020-06-11	5	.pdf	application/pdf	2683	185	58	library profession prefers "ontologies" over "vocabularies" when it comes to defining classes and Ontologies and vocabularies are common when working with RDF (Resource Description ontologies and vocabularies referred to here are in fact defined using RDF—Thing A is a Class and Those using any given ontology or vocabulary employ the defined classes Ontologies in the RDF space frequently, if not always, use classes and properties from the Web Ontology Language (known as OWL) to define a specific realm's classes and properties and how Now that the owl:inverseOf triple/declaration has been added to the definitions, it's worth reasking: Do the definitions represent an "ontology" or a "vocabulary?" OWL:Ontology) combined with a far more extensive set of class and property definitions with more damaging—the property (read: model/vocabulary/ontology) is avoided. much wider user bases than the more library-specific ontologies (Bibframe, MADS/RDF, BIBO, http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe.html; "MADS/RDF (Metadata Authority Description http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/; "DCMI Metadata expressed in RDF Schema Language," Dublin 	./cache/12367.pdf	./txt/12367.txt