id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
8930	Ullah, Asim; Khusro, Shah; Ullah, Irfan	Bibliographic Classification in the Digital Age: Current Trends ##TITLE## Future Directions	2017-09-17	30	.pdf	application/pdf	11940	1386	48	reported different approaches to bibliographic classification of digital collections. former supports the use of conventional classification schemes including CC, DDC, and LCC etc., in We have chosen CC, DDC, LCC, and Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) on the basis of their based on this metric, the classification systems can be ranked as DMOZ, ACM, IEEE, DDC, LCC, UDC, these classification systems can be ranked as ACM, IEEE, DDC, LCC, UDC, CC, and DMOZ at the last could be ACM, IEEE, DMOZ are on top with similar rankings followed by UDC, DDC, LCC, and CC. metric, the rankings of classification systems could be DDC, UDC, LCC, ACM, IEEE, CC, whereas Therefore, ACM and IEEE, DDC, and LCC stand first with least search complexity followed by UDC, of electronic documents using classification metadata of library holdings from LCC and DDC Among our choice of well-known classification systems UDC, LCC, DDC, IEEE, ACM and DMOZ have 	./cache/8930.pdf	./txt/8930.txt