id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_nsikzubac5dvdi4f67cir6urhm	Robert Bagley	Discussion of 'Style' from Max Loehr and the Study of Chinese Bronzes, Style and Classification in the History of Art, Ithaca, Cornell University Press: Cornell East Asia Series 2008	2010	16	.pdf	application/pdf	7165	432	68	Loehr'S "the Bronze StyLeS of the anyang Period" (1953) attention all involve the concept of style—"a concept largely undefined, but usually referring to the changing forms of different types of vessels and to their ornamentation."402 In trying to decide what style meant to Loehr she examined not only entangled with unresolved problems in historiography.405 I would like to suggest that Loehr's idea of style (but not Bachhofer's) was a simple one, and that style meant to him what it means in practice, if not in theory, to most art historians today. Loehr's use of the concept of style throughout his writing can, I believe, be For art historians who think in this way, the history This is emphatically not a part of Loehr's understanding of style or of history. speaking of French Gothic architecture, but Loehr obviously felt that in studying Shang bronzes he too was concerned with artistic life in a period of great 	./cache/work_nsikzubac5dvdi4f67cir6urhm.pdf	./txt/work_nsikzubac5dvdi4f67cir6urhm.txt