id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_pd5tcecymndexavntufnigju3i	Susan Stanford Friedman	Reply	2012	3	.pdf	application/pdf	2044	111	53	Koshy and Gajarawala, then, read the Partition in contrary ways and to contrary ends. vernacular, is to refuse—like the Dalit texts examined by Gajarawala—what may be called the Gajarawala's reading of Dalit texts. In any event, her particular reading should not be generalized into an argument out of South Asian diasporas assumes a historicity for which the Partition of India in 1947 Shankar maintains, exhibits a diferent historicity, for which Partition is peripheral. forms of knowledge" (in Dalit literature, based What new insights emerge from the juxtaposition of Koshy's and Gajarawala's arguments? term as a "form of knowledge." he vernacular of the term vernacular as Shankar uses it in his The particularities of Dalit history in Dalit narratives are affected by global historical forces (like Partition) "Some Time between Revisionist and Revolutionary: Unreading History in Dalit Literature." Shankar leshes out how attention to the argument about Dalit texts as such." Shankar 	./cache/work_pd5tcecymndexavntufnigju3i.pdf	./txt/work_pd5tcecymndexavntufnigju3i.txt