key: cord-350925-1h6pbfwp
authors: da Silva, Priscilla Gomes; Nascimento, Maria São José; Soares, Ruben R.G.; Sousa, Sofia I.V.; Mesquita, João R.
title: Airborne spread of infectious SARS-CoV-2: moving forward using lessons from SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV
date: 2020-10-08
journal: Sci Total Environ
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142802
sha: 
doc_id: 350925
cord_uid: 1h6pbfwp

Background Although an increasing body of data reports the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in air, this does not correlate to the presence of infectious viruses, thus not evaluating the risk for airborne COVID-19. Hence there is a marked knowledge gap that requires urgent attention. Therefore, in this systematic review, viability/stability of airborne SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV viruses is discussed. Methods A systematic literature review was performed on PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus to assess the stability and viability of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 on air samples. Results and discussion The initial search identified 27 articles. Following screening of titles and abstracts and removing duplicates, 11 articles were considered relevant. Temperatures ranging from 20 °C to 25 °C and relative humidity ranging from 40% to 50% were reported to have a protective effect on viral viability for airborne SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. As no data is yet available on the conditions influencing viability for airborne SARS-CoV-2, and given the genetic similarity to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, one could extrapolate that the same conditions would apply. Nonetheless, the effect of these conditions seems to be residual considering the increasing number of cases in the south of USA, Brazil and India, where high temperatures and humidities have been observed. Conclusion Higher temperatures and high relative humidity can have a modest effect on SARS-CoV-2 viability in the environment, as reported in previous studies to this date. However, these studies are experimental, and do not support the fact that the virus has efficiently spread in the tropical regions of the globe, with other transmission routes such as the contact and droplet ones probably being responsible for the majority of cases reported in these regions, along with other factors such as human mobility patterns and contact rates. Further studies are needed to investigate the extent of aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 as this would have important implications for public health and infection-control policies.

HCoV-OC43, HCoV-NL63, HCoV-HKU1, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Virus (SARS-CoV), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Virus (MERS-CoV) and the emerging SARS-CoV-2 (responsible for COVID-19) (Shereen et al., 2020; Ye et al., 2020) .

Coronaviruses usually infect the cells from the respiratory tract and are responsible for different respiratory diseases that range from mild disease to severe acute respiratory syndromes (Rothan and Byrareddy, 2020; Talbot et al., 2008) . Human coronaviruses represent a major problem for human health and impose a tremendous economic burden (Keogh-Brown and Smith, 2008; Paules et al., 2020) . These viruses are considered a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in humans worldwide, as seen with the past SARS and MERS outbreaks (Kim et al., 2017; Qiu et al., 2018) and the current COVID-19 global pandemic (Peeri et al., 2020) . Globally, as of 10:52am CEST, 24 September 2020, there have been 31,664,104 confirmed cases of including 972, 221 deaths, reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) (WHO, 2020). Viral respiratory infections are known to be spread by contact (direct or indirect) with secretions expelled by the infected person, or through air via droplets and aerosols (Kutter et al., 2018) . Contact transmission can happen when a healthy person comes in close contact with an infected person (direct contact) or surfaces (fomites) where viruscontaining droplets expelled by an infected person have been deposited (indirect contact) (Morawska and Cao, 2020) . Transmission of viruses through air can happen via droplets or aerosols generated during coughing, sneezing, talking, singing or breathing (Jones and CoV-2 is that most studies performed only focused on the detection of viral RNA and do not correlate to the infectivity of these viral particles. There is an inherent high technical complexity that also hampers the confirmation of the aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 infectiousness, requiring viral replication to differentiate viable from non/viable virus and including a number of particular methodological requirements, namely proper specimen selection, collection, transport, and storage that preserve viral infectivity (Leland and Ginocchio, 2007) .

provided recent guidelines recommending that handling of material with high concentrations of viable SARS-CoV-2, such as when performing virus propagation, should be performed only in laboratories capable of meeting strict containment requirements and practices (Biosafety Level-3), limiting the number of institutions capable of assessing aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 viability (Blacksell et al., 2020; CDC, 2020) .

Considering the many structural and genetic similarities between SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 (Petrosillo et al., 2020) , and taking into consideration previous studies about SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV that point out the potential for airborne transmission of these viruses (Eissenberg et al., 2020; Kutter et al., 2018; Olsen et al., 2003; Pyankov et al., 2018; Qian and Zheng, 2018; Ramanathan et al., 2020; Tellier et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2004; Zhao et al., 2011) , the likelihood for airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is very high (Morawska and Cao, 2020; Tellier et al., 2019) . However, to date, only five studies have provided information on SARS-CoV-2 viability in air (Binder et al., 2020; Lednicky et al., 2020; Lednicky et al., 2020a; Santarpia et al., 2020; van Doremalen et al., 2020) . Thus, there is a marked knowledge gap that requires urgent attention. An opportunity for advancing research in airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Journal Pre-proof is by comparison to the viability of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. Therefore, in this systematic review, the viability/stability of aerosols containing SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV viruses will be discussed to provide information on potential mitigation strategies for SARS-CoV-2 airborne transmission.

The present review includes studies published in the past 18 years (1 january 2002 to 25 september 2020), since the emergence of SARS-CoV (WHO, 2002) and MERS-CoV (WHO, 2012) , in the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus. No language restrictions were imposed during the search, retrieving only one article in Chinese. With no prior review articles on this topic, an exhaustive search was made, and published research articles were included.

The following search terms were used: -SARS‖, -MERS‖, -airborne‖, -viability‖, -stability‖, -virus‖, -aerosol‖, -coronavirus‖, and -air sample‖. A total of 27 articles were found with potential interest from the initial search and their titles were screened based on their context of research. From those, 20 articles remained, and their abstracts were appropriately reviewed. After this, exclusions were performed based on the following criteria: i) if the virus studied was SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV or SARS-CoV-2; and ii) if the viability of the virus sampled from air was assessed. Using these criteria, 18 articles were excluded and 10 additional relevant articles were found while reading the selected articles, with 1 article being excluded. Summarizing, 11 articles were reviewed in detail. Figure 1 shows the flowchart with the number of studies identified and included/excluded following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement (Moher et al., 2009 ).

The databases were independently screened by all authors, and relevant information J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f was extracted. Differences on opinions about whether to include an article or not were solved by consensus between all the authors.

The selected articles evaluated concerning the objective of the research, sampling site/methods and main conclusions are compiled in Table 1 .

Viral infectivity is defined as the capacity of the virus to attach and enter the host cell and use its resources to ultimately produce new infectious virions (Rodríguez et al., 2009 ).

In the case of enveloped viruses such as coronaviruses, viral entry is initiated by the interaction of the viral particle with specific proteins on the cell surface. After initial binding of the receptor, these enveloped viruses fuse their envelope with the host cell membrane to deliver their capsid to the target cell (Belouzard et al., 2012) . The capsid also confers protection to the viral genome by preventing its degradation by nucleases and other abiotic stresses. Therefore capsid integrity is a critical attribute for the virus to successfully infect a host cell (Cliver, 2009 ).

Among the reviewed literature, only a few papers explored viral viability in air samples (Agranovski et al., 2004; Binder et al., 2020; Booth et al., 2005; Kim et al., 2016; Lednicky et al., 2020; Lednicky et al., 2020a; Pyankov et al., 2018; Santarpia et al., 2020; van Doremalen et al., 2013 van Doremalen et al., , 2020 Xiao et al., 2004) . Remarkably, the majority of the literature focuses exclusively on the detection of viral RNA in air samples (Cheng et al., Aiming at simplifying the determination of viral infectivity, alternative strategies to cell culture and TCID 50 determination have been explored. These strategies resort typically combining RT-PCR with a pre-processing step aiming at deconvoluting viable from non-viable virus particles prior to amplification (Goyal and Cannon, 2006) . A few examples of these methods are (1) enzymatic pre-treatments (such as ribonuclease) (Escudero-Abarca et al., 2014; Monteiro and Santos, 2018; Nuanualsuwan and Cliver, 2002; Rönnqvist et al., 2014) ; (2) pre-treatments with intercalating dyes for detection of damaged capsids (Leifels et al., 2015; Moreno et al., 2015; Parshionikar et al., 2010; Randazzo et al., 2018) ; (3) porcine gastric mucin binding (Dancho et al., 2012; Kingsley et al., 2014) ; (4) antibody binding (Ogorzaly et al., 2013) ; and (5) integrated cell-culture PCR assays (Blackmer et al., 2000; Dunams et al., 2012) . Overall, developments in these alternative viral infectivity analytical strategies, largely unexplored in the context of current and past coronavirus pandemics, is of paramount importance to enable not only routine fundamental insights into the effective spread of the virus and its societal impact, as well as enabling effective biosensing strategies for on-site determination of viral infectivity. Both these currently unpaved avenues are critical to uncover the true impact of airborne spread of SARS-CoV-2. Lednicky et al., 2020; Razzini et al., 2020; Santarpia et al., 2020; Santarpia et al., 2020a Santarpia et al., , 2020b Zhou et al., 2020) .

Previous work with SARS-CoV showed that viral RNA, as well as viable virus, were found in air samples (Booth et al., 2005; Xiao et al., 2004) . Several other studies have reported that SARS-CoV airborne transmission was the main transmission route in indoor cases studied in Hong Kong's Prince of Wales Hospital Xiao et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2005) , health care facilities in Canada (Booth et al., 2005) and in aircraft (Olsen et al., 2003) . These results suggest that both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 can potentially be transmitted by aerosols and cause disease, therefore supporting potential airborne transmission.

The presence of MERS-CoV was also confirmed by RT-PCR of viral cultures of 4 out of 7 air samples from two hospitals in South Korea (Kim et al., 2016) , and showed to be very stable in aerosol at 20°C and 40% relative humidity (van Doremalen et al., 2013) . Furthermore, the virus demonstrated relatively high robustness in the airborne form under controlled laboratory conditions (Pyankov et al., 2018) , suggesting that MERS could also be transmitted by aerosols.

Although not investigating SARS-CoV-2 viability, some studies suggested that J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f airborne transmission might occur (Buonanno et al., 2020; Cai et al., 2020; Hamner et al., 2020; . reported that up to 73% of infected patients reported having had no contact with a person with respiratory symptoms or exposure to relevant contaminated areas, which could be explained by a possible airborne transmission of the virus. Ong et al., (2020) also showed that air outlet fans located high on the wall behind the bed of one infected patient were contaminated with SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that virus-containing aerosols produced by the isolated patient were displaced by airflow and deposited on the vents.

Moreover, sampling methods and environmental conditions are very important factors to consider when studying viral viability and stability in aerosols because air sampling techniques can also affect the viability of virus recovered from air (Tseng and Li, 2005; Verreault et al., 2008) . Problems such as inefficiency at the collection of fine particles, dehydration of viruses during the collection process, damage of the viruses during collection due to impaction forces resulting in the loss of viability of some or all the collected viruses, re-aerosolization leading to the loss of viruses from the collection media, and losses due to viruses being trapped by the inlet or the samplers' wall should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results of experiments involving air sampling. Noteworthy, samplers based on technologies such as the water-based condensation are considered more suitable for these studies (Pan et al., 2016; Yu et al., 2018) .

Physical characteristics of the environment such as ultraviolet light (UV), temperature, relative humidity, as well as wind currents and ventilation systems, are critical environmental factors that will determine the settling time of airborne particles (Alonso et al., 2015) .

There are three types of UV light: UVA (320-400 nm), UVB (280-320 nm), and UVC (200-280 nm) . UVC is known to be absorbed by RNA and DNA bases, resulting in the photochemical fusion of two adjacent pyrimidines into covalently linked dimers, which in turn lose the ability to pair with each other (Perdiz et al., 2000) . Previous studies have shown that UVC is able to inactivate aerosolized coronaviruses (Darnell et al., 2004; Walker and Ko, 2007) , with more recent studies on the subject reporting that simulated sunlight is also able to inactivate airborne SARS-CoV-2, highlighting the hypothesis that persistence and exposure risk to airborne viruses might vary between indoor and outdoor environments Schuit et al., 2020) Temperature is another significant factor for virus survival because it can affect the state of viral proteins and the virus genome (Price et al., 2019) . Temperatures above 60 °C for more than 60 min are thought to be sufficient to inactivate most enveloped viruses, and depending on the presence of any surrounding organic material such as saliva, the virus might be insulated against extreme environmental changes (Tang, 2009) . In a study by Pan et al. (2019) , it was reported that artificial saliva could better protect infectious viruses from deactivation by preventing viruses of reaching the air-water-interface, possibly due to the complex structure of the mucin component. In a similar study, Woo et al. (2012) reported that the inactivation efficiency of droplet and aerosolized viruses under different humidity levels and UV irradiation at a constant intensity were low in artificial saliva, indicating that solids present in it might exhibit a protective effect.

The relative humidity is also significant for virus survival and stability because phospholipid-protein complexes in enveloped viruses are usually more likely to denature in the air at medium to high relative humidity. In contrast, the protein coats of nonenveloped viruses denature easier at low relative humidity (Sobsey and Meschke, 2003) , which explains why most enveloped viruses tend to survive longer at a lower relative J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f humidity (Tang, 2009 ). In addition to that, when faced with high humidity, such as in tropical regions as the Amazon rainforest where relative humidity values can get close to 100% during the rainy season, viruses are associated with larger droplets that settle down much faster, which can be a limiting factor to transmission (Yang and Marr, 2011) .

In an attempt to study the effects of temperature and relative humidity on the viability of the SARS-CoV, a study found that low temperature and low humidity was able to prolong survival of virus on contaminated surfaces (Chan et al., 2011) . The same was found to be true for MERS-CoV. A study reported the stability of MERS-CoV at 20°C and 40% relative humidity; 30°C and 30% relative humidity; and 30°C and 80% relative humidity, and concluded that MERS-CoV was more stable at lower temperature and lower humidity conditions (van Doremalen et al., 2013) . In another study, two sets of climatic conditions were used in order to establish the inactivation of MERS-CoV: one represented the common indoor office environment (25°C and 79% relative humidity) and the other represented the climatic conditions of the Middle Eastern region where the virus outbreak started (38°C and 24% relative humidity) (Pyankov et al., 2018) . Authors found that the virus had a better survival rate at a lower temperature, with virus decay being higher in hot and dry air.

In a recent study, atomic force microscopy was applied to investigate the topographical changes of SARS-CoV-2 virions exposed to high-temperature treatments, reporting that after the treatment, the virus had much fewer less distinct spikes, their trigonal shape not being able to be resolved, suggesting heat-induced inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 (Kiss et al., 2020). Another study reported that the virus was stable at 4 °C in virus transport medium, but sensitive to heat, and that at 22 °C and 65% relative humidity had a negative effect on viral survival on smooth surfaces (Chin et al., 2020) .

Other studies have reported the effects of humidity and temperature on SARS-CoV-2 J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f transmission based on meteorological data and statistical analysis (Auler et al., 2020; Ma et al., 2020; Méndez-Arriaga, 2020; Meo et al., 2020; Meyer et al., 2020; Sajadi et al., 2020; Ward et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020; Xie and Zhu, 2020; Yao et al., 2020) . Although all of them have reported a correlation between temperature and relative humidity and the number of new COVID-19 cases, there is still some controversy regarding whether one or both variables have a positive, negative or no effect on the number of new cases. The main outcomes of these studies are presented on Table S1 (supplementary material).

Given the genetic and structural similarities between SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, one might suggest that higher temperatures and relative humidities could have an impact on the viability of SARS-CoV-2 in the environment. Nonetheless, the effect of these conditions seems to be residual (Meyer et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020) considering the increasing number of cases in the south of USA, Brazil and India, where high temperatures and humidities have been observed.

Moreover, it should be noted that although SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV can give us an idea of how SARS-CoV-2 might behave, using SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV to predict the behaviour and spread patterns of SARS-CoV-2 is not advisable, as these three viruses are different, and SARS-CoV-2 might not necessarily follow the same patterns as the aforementioned viruses and more studies are needed in this subject to determine how these environmental variables might impact the virus transmission.

Other factors, such as human mobility patterns and contact rates, should also be taken into consideration as contributing factors to the different transmission rates in different countries (Badr et al., 2020) . In developing countries such as Brazil and India, other transmission routes (e.g., the contact and droplet routes) may account for the increasing number of cases rather than the airborne route, as these countries are very densely populated, have overcrowded accommodations and lack of access to basic services, J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f therefore enabling the contact and droplet routes of transmission and spread of the virus.

These individual and collective factors such as political, social, economic and cultural conditions should be considered when analyzing the spread of the virus in these countries, as they may play a more significant role than temperature and relative humidity (Auler et al., 2020) . Specific measures such as quarantines and lockdowns can also affect the incidence of the virus, as different countries have different approaches and mitigation strategies to deal with the pandemic.

Among the reviewed literature, only a few papers explored viral viability in air samples, which is probably due to the difficulty and limitation of many research groups regarding BSL-3 facilities. Nonetheless, efforts should be directed towards the development of novel or adapted analytical methods to reliably and systematically determine the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 viral particles as this would enable not only routine fundamental insights into the effective spread of the virus and its societal impact, as well as enabling effective biosensing strategies for on-site determination of viral infectivity as previously mentioned.

Currently, there is still debate about whether or not SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted through aerosols produced by infected people during talking, singing sneezing, coughing and breathing, and further studies regarding this route of transmission are needed in order 

To explore the feasibility of a new personal bioaerosol sampler for monitoring of viable airborne SARS virus.

PC4 facility with HEPA filters installed in the pipeline connecting sampler and vacuum pump to prevent the equipment contamination.

Contaminated air was bubbled through porous medium submerged into liquid and subsequently split into multitude of very small bubbles.

The particles are scavenged by these bubbles, and, thus, effectively removed.

Natural decay of the virus in the collection fluid was around 0.75 and 1.76 log during 2 and 4h of continuous operation, respectively. A much higher decay rate (2.58 log) was observed for the bubbling through viral suspension in sterile water.

Yes. The device filled with virus maintenance fluid was capable of providing a relatively low level of microbial decay and can be evaluated for monitoring of such microorganisms in the air. W. Xiao et al., (2004) SARS-CoV-1

To assess the risk of aerosol transmission in SARS patients admitted to a hospital through testing the air samples.

Air samples were collected from 7 wards and 1 balcony of the hospital, 3 times a day for 3 continuous days.

The bioaerosol sampler type FA-2 was used. RT-PCR was used to amplify the N protein gene of the SARS-CoV.

The residual solutions were inoculated into prepared cell cultures to isolate live virus. The positive samples were then identified by indirect immunofluorescence assay and sequence analysis of the PCR products. Air sampling was performed using a high-resolution slitsampler system and samples were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV by RT-PCR and cell culture isolation.

PCR-positive viruses were collected from wet and dry air samples but results of viability assays of the samples for infectivity in Vero-E6 cell culture were negative.

No. Not specified.

Kim et al.,

To study the possible contribution of contaminated hospital air and surfaces to MERS transmission. A suspension containing virus was prepared and aerosolized aerosolised to the experimental aerosol chamber by a 3-jet Collison nebulizer nebuliser at the flow rate of 6 L/min of HEPAfiltered compressed air over 2 mins time. Then the nebulizer nebuliser was switched off. The experiments were performed for two sets of parameters of the air. On completion of sampling at each time interval, the bioaerosol samplers were disconnected and aliquots of collecting liquid were acquired and analyzed analysed by end-point titration in Vero E6 cells. 

To evaluate the stability of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-1 in aerosols and on various surfaces and estimate their decay rates using a Bayesian regression model. Laboratory under controlled conditions. Aerosols (<5 μm) containing SARS-CoV-2 (10 5.25 50% TCID 50 per milliliter) or SARS-CoV-1 (10 6.75-7.00 TCID 50 per milliliter) were generated with the use of a three-jet Collison nebulizer nebuliser and fed into a Goldberg drum to create an aerosolized aerosolised environment. All samples were quantified by end-point titration on Vero E6 cells. SARS-CoV-2 nCoV-WA1-2020 (MN985325.1) and SARS-CoV-1 Tor2 (AY274119.3) were the strains used.

SARS-CoV-2 remained viable in aerosols throughout the duration of the experiment (3 hours), with a reduction in infectious titer from 10 3.5 to 10 2.7 TCID 50 per liter of air.

Yes. Not specified.

Detection of airborne severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus and environmental contamination in SARS outbreak units

Rapid review: Aerosol generating procedures in health care, and COVID-19

Quantitative assessment of the risk of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection: prospective and retrospective applications

Indirect virus transmission in cluster of COVID-19 cases

CDC, 2020. Interim Laboratory Biosafety Guidelines for Handling and Processing Specimens Associated with Coronavirus Disease

NCIRD), Div. Viral Dis

The effects of temperature and relative humidity on the viability of the SARS coronavirus

Escalating infection control response to the rapidly evolving epidemiology of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to SARS-CoV-2 in Hong Kong

Detection of air and surface contamination by SARS-CoV-2 in hospital rooms of infected patients

Stability of SARS-CoV-2 in different environmental conditions

Capsid and Infectivity in Virus Detection

Discrimination between infectious and noninfectious human norovirus using porcine gastric mucin

Inactivation of the J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Journal Pre-proof coronavirus that induces severe acute respiratory syndrome, SARS-CoV

Simultaneous Detection of Infectious Human Echoviruses and Adenoviruses by an In Situ Nuclease-Resistant Molecular Beacon-Based Assay

Treat COVID-19 as Though It Is Airborne: It May Be

Molecular methods used to estimate thermal inactivation of a prototype human norovirus: More heat resistant than previously believed? Food Microbiol

A field indoor air measurement of SARS-CoV-2 in the patient rooms of the largest hospital in Iran

Food Microbiology and Food Safety Research and Development

Aerosol and Surface Distribution of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Hospital Wards

Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia

Role of air distribution in SARS transmission during the largest nosocomial outbreak in Hong Kong

Evidence for probable aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in a poorly ventilated restaurant. medRxiv 1-19

Effects of temperature variation and humidity on the death of COVID-19 in Wuhan

The temperature and regional climate effects on communitarian COVID-19 contagion in Mexico throughout phase 1

Effect of heat and humidity on the incidence and mortality in world's top ten hottest and top ten coldest countries

That Higher Temperatures Are Associated With a Marginally Lower Incidence of COVID-19 Cases

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

Enzymatic and viability RT-qPCR assays for evaluation of enterovirus, hepatitis A virus and norovirus inactivation: Implications for public health risk assessment

Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: The world should face the reality

It is Time to Address Airborne Transmission of COVID-19

Application of viability PCR to discriminate the infectivity of hepatitis A virus in food samples

Pretreatment to avoid positive RT-PCR results with inactivated viruses

Development of a quantitative immunocapture real-time PCR assay for detecting structurally intact adenoviral particles in water

Transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome on Aircraft

Air, Surface Environmental, and Personal Protective Equipment Contamination by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) From a Symptomatic Patient

Determination of the distribution of infectious viruses in aerosol particles using water-based condensational growth technology and a bacteriophage MS2 model

Efficient collection of viable virus aerosol through laminar-flow, water-based condensational particle growth

Use of propidium monoazide in reverse transcriptase PCR to distinguish between infectious and noninfectious enteric viruses in water samples

Coronavirus Infections-More Than Just the Common Cold

The SARS, MERS and novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemics, the newest and biggest global health threats: what lessons have we learned?

Distribution and repair of bipyrimidine photoproducts in solar UV-irradiated mammalian cells. Possible role of Dewar photoproducts in solar mutagenesis

COVID-19, SARS and MERS: are they closely related?

Association between viral seasonality and meteorological factors

Survival of aerosolized coronavirus in the ambient air

Ventilation control for airborne transmission of human exhaled bio-aerosols in buildings

The Impacts on Health, Society, and Economy of SARS and H7N9 Outbreaks in China: A Case Comparison Study

Transmission of SARS and MERS coronaviruses and influenza virus in healthcare settings: the possible role of dry surface contamination

Viability RT-qPCR to distinguish between HEV and HAV with intact and altered capsids

Simulated Sunlight Rapidly Inactivates SARS-CoV-2 on Surfaces

SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in the air and on surfaces in the COVID-19 ward of a hospital in Milan

Application of PCR-based methods to assess the infectivity of enteric viruses in environmental samples

Ultraviolet Light Inactivation of Murine Norovirus and Human Norovirus GII: PCR May Overestimate the Persistence of Noroviruses Even When Combined with Pre-PCR Treatments

The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Journal Pre-proof disease (COVID-19) outbreak

Temperature, Humidity, and Latitude Analysis to Estimate Potential Spread and Seasonality of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Aerosol and Surface Transmission Potential of SARS-CoV-2

Aerosol and surface contamination of SARS-CoV-2 observed in quarantine and isolation care

Airborne SARS-CoV-2 Is Rapidly Inactivated by Simulated Sunlight

COVID-19 infection: Origin, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses

Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Healthcare Settings

Virus survival in the environment with special attention to survival in sewage droplets and other environmental media of fecal or respiratory origin

Pathogenesis of Human Coronaviruses Other than Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus

The effect of environmental parameters on the survival of airborne infectious agents

Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents: A commentary

Collection efficiencies of aerosol samplers for virus-containing aerosols

Stability of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) under different environmental conditions

Methods for Sampling of Airborne Viruses

Effect of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation on viral aerosols

Humidity is a consistent climatic factor contributing to SARS-CoV-2 transmission

Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: implications for infection prevention precautions [WWW Document

Airborne transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 to healthcare workers: a narrative review

Effects of relative humidity and spraying medium on UV decontamination of filters loaded with viral aerosols

Endonasal instrumentation and aerosolization risk in the era of COVID-19: simulation, literature review, and proposed mitigation strategies

Effects of temperature and humidity on the daily new cases and new deaths of COVID-19 in 166 countries

Role of fomites in SARS transmission during the largest hospital outbreak in Hong Kong

Association between ambient temperature and COVID-19 infection in 122 cities from China

Dynamics of Airborne influenza A viruses indoors and dependence on humidity

On airborne transmission and control of SARS-Cov-2

Zoonotic origins of human coronaviruses

An J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Journal Pre-proof efficient virus aerosol sampler enabled by adiabatic expansion

Evidence of Airborne Transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Virus

Temporal-Spatial Analysis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome among Hospital Inpatients

Role of two-way airflow owing to temperature difference in severe acute respiratory syndrome transmission: Revisiting the largest nosocomial severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak in Hong Kong

Investigating SARS-CoV-2 surface and air contamination in an acute healthcare setting during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in London

 Figure 1