id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_6uoaqa6pxza3tfmjem2mzzcpvu	E Feiring	Lifestyle, responsibility and justice	2008	4	.pdf	application/pdf	4726	622	67	compensated, while inequalities that reflect personal choices of lifestyle may not, is discussed. Within all modern societies healthcare authorities are facing difficult priority setting problems. concern with a choice-oriented view of responsibility may be labelled luck-egalitarianism.3 A backward-looking interpretation of individual responsibility for (high risk of) deviations from normal whether there are good reasons to accept a backward-looking conception of individual responsibility when making decisions on priority setting SHOULD LIFESTYLE CHOICES AFFECT PRIORITY SETTING? individual lifestyle choices (contributing to r1), than for patients If the individual can reasonably be held responsible for (high between choices and circumstances have fundamental importance for questions of how to ration scarce healthcare resources Would it be altogether wrong to consider individual responsibility when allocating scarce healthcare resources? understanding of medical need, be given priority over patients autonomous choices of patients runs deep in modern healthcare, there are strong reasons to value the claim that competent	./cache/work_6uoaqa6pxza3tfmjem2mzzcpvu.pdf	./txt/work_6uoaqa6pxza3tfmjem2mzzcpvu.txt