id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_qcpjdzjvybamjgrlm5q7qwjidm	Kok-Chor Tan	The Boundary of Justice and the Justice of Boundaries: Defending Global Egalitarianism	2006	27	.pdf	application/pdf	14883	705	51	For instance, taking (what they take to be) Rawls's central argument for domestic distributive justice, namely, that individuals should not be disadvantaged on account of arbitrary factors such as their social class, natural I will consider two classes of arguments often deployed by the anti-global egalitarians against attempts to universalize the demands of distributive equality. That is, the principle of special concern imposes demands on persons that limit what global equality can in fact demand On this view, it is the presence of lawful state coercion that motivates a distributive egalitarian commitment among citizens of the 9 The argument is that an institutional commitment to distributive equality is one necessary way (though, presumably, not sufficient) in which the coercive authority of the state can be justified to all and hence arrangements that limits personal autonomy is what motivates the need for a distributive egalitarian commitment in domestic society, then so too, it seems, must	./cache/work_qcpjdzjvybamjgrlm5q7qwjidm.pdf	./txt/work_qcpjdzjvybamjgrlm5q7qwjidm.txt