id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_qvng7je7ize7nmwck56qrzslam	Laurel A. McNall	Effects of Electronic Monitoring Types on Perceptions of Procedural Justice, Interpersonal Justice, and Privacy	2007	25	.pdf	application/pdf	9357	739	47	Effects of Electronic Monitoring Types on Perceptions of Procedural Justice, Interpersonal Justice, and Privacy1 Electronic performance monitoring and control systems (EPMCSs) are raising fairness and privacy concerns in many organizations. EPMCS types significantly influenced perceptions of procedural justice, interpersonal justice, and privacy. Computer monitoring was perceived as the most procedurally just; but traditional direct observation by a supervisor without electronic focused solely on perceptions of procedural justice under conditions of electronic monitoring because employees are most commonly concerned about antecedent in determining employees' reactions to EPMCSs. Ambrose and Alder (2000) also included procedural justice in their comprehensive model of computer performance monitoring, which they based on from research on privacy is very similar to the aforementioned tasksmonitored dimension in the electronic monitoring and procedural justice differences between the various types of EPMCSs. In Ambrose et al.'s surveillance category, employees' workand non-work-related behaviors are of activities (relevant and non-relevant), privacy may mediate the relationship between EPMCS type and procedural justice.	./cache/work_qvng7je7ize7nmwck56qrzslam.pdf	./txt/work_qvng7je7ize7nmwck56qrzslam.txt