id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_xm7bxs3dovabrbmqomg3tlnwhu	S. Besson	Four Arguments Against Compromising Justice Internally	2003	32	.pdf	application/pdf	18229	1008	59	argued, external compromises of principle can be tolerated and may even be desirable in some cases. article and it is suggested that democratic procedures can be understood as compromises qua process: they select one of the conflicting views held during deliberation, principle in their dispute, but also about whether they should actually compromise at all.39 The broader issue raised here is that reasonable disagreement over compromises; the principles of mutual respect and accommodation of our differences only hold among people who that, whether or not there are some arguments for compromising in some cases of conflict of principles, these arguments do not hold in the case where the compromises are internal to those principles. that the minimal principle of coherence within an individual statute or decision requires rejecting internal compromises: compare Raz, above n 82 at 314 ff.	./cache/work_xm7bxs3dovabrbmqomg3tlnwhu.pdf	./txt/work_xm7bxs3dovabrbmqomg3tlnwhu.txt