id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
en-wikipedia-org-131		View source for Immanuel Kant - Wikipedia			.html	text/html	6430	655	65	131</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.equip.org/article/immanuel-kant/|title=Immanuel Kant|publisher=Christian Research Institute|access-date=15 June 2017|archive-date=20 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170620130216/http://www.equip.org/article/immanuel-kant/|url-status=live}}</ref> However, as Kant was skeptical about some of the arguments used prior to him in defence of [[theism]] and maintained that human understanding is limited and can never attain knowledge about God or the [[soul]], various commentators have labelled him a philosophical [[agnostic]].<ref>"While this sounds skeptical, Kant is only agnostic about our knowledge of metaphysical objects such as God. And, as noted above, Kant's agnosticism leads to the conclusion that we can neither affirm nor deny claims made by traditional metaphysics." Andrew Fiala, [[John Meiklejohn|J.M.D. Meiklejohn]], ''Critique of Pure Reason'' – Introduction, p. Although now uniformly recognized as one of the greatest works in the history of philosophy, this ''Critique'' disappointed Kant's readers upon its initial publication.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Dorrien|first=Gary|title=Kantian Reason and Hegelian Spirit: The Idealistic Logic of Modern Theology|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|year=2012|isbn=978-0-470-67331-7|location=Malden, MA|pages=37}}</ref> The book was long, over 800 pages in the original German edition, and written in a convoluted style.	./cache/en-wikipedia-org-131.html	./txt/en-wikipedia-org-131.txt