id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cord-256743-v8vegody	Papes, Dino	Redundancy and methodological issues in articles on COVID‐19	2020-06-07		.txt	text/plain	1318	72	43	In the aftermath, months from now, the same authors and journals will probably publish corrections and retrospectives recognizing the mentioned issues and justifying them with the need for rapid spread of information that was necessary to fight the virus. By reviewing the published material, one can determine that the majority of articles are of low quality, repetitive, hastily written, methodologically flawed and highly biased. We have determined three main issues in COVID-19 publications: 1) Non-evidence based information/recommendation. All rights reserved 3) both statistical and clinical significance criteria should be clearly defined, critically assessed and approved before conducting and publishing a study with journals being more critical and selective when publishing RCTs, systematic-reviews and meta-analyses. All rights reserved Article and specific design type such as Review, the publication was counted as a specific design type. Methodological challenges of analysing COVID-19 data during the pandemic Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19 infection: systematic review and critical appraisal	./cache/cord-256743-v8vegody.txt	./txt/cord-256743-v8vegody.txt