id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cord-347874-cmgd5rqt	de Miguel Beriain, Iñigo	Immunity passports, fundamental rights and public health hazards: a reply to Brown et al	2020-09-09		.txt	text/plain	1961	111	57	title: Immunity passports, fundamental rights and public health hazards: a reply to Brown et al We argue that if a person has been tested positive for and recovered from COVID-19, becoming immune to it, she cannot be considered a hazard to public health and, therefore, the curtailment of her fundamental rights (eg, the right to freedom of movement) is not legitimate. If a person does not pose a threat to public health because she cannot spread the infection, then her right to freedom of movement should be respected, regardless of how she acquired that immunity. It is necessary to emphasise that the Convention does not even allow in principle to limit the freedom of movement to avoid a risk of collapse for the health system-one of the reasons given to justify the lockdowns, as Brown et al pointed out.	./cache/cord-347874-cmgd5rqt.txt	./txt/cord-347874-cmgd5rqt.txt