id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cord-331646-j5mkparg	Sze To, G. N.	Review and comparison between the Wells–Riley and dose‐response approaches to risk assessment of infectious respiratory diseases	2009-07-31		.txt	text/plain	11058	551	45	Dose‐response models can consider other disease transmission routes in addition to airborne route and can calculate the infectious source strength of an outbreak in terms of the quantity of the pathogen rather than a hypothetical unit. Dose-response models can consider other disease transmission routes in addition to airborne route and can calculate the infectious source strength of an outbreak in terms of the quantity of the pathogen rather than a hypothetical unit. Some newer studies have proposed to use dose-response models for assessing the infection risk of airborne-transmissible pathogens (e.g., Armstrong and Haas, 2007a; Nicas, 1996; Sze To et al., 2008) . Some Review of the Wells-Riley and dose-response models studies also suggested that the deposition loss of infectious particles and the viability loss of pathogens while airborne can also be considered by adding these sink terms in the denominator, similar to Equation 11 (Fisk et al., 2005; Franchimon et al., 2008) :	./cache/cord-331646-j5mkparg.txt	./txt/cord-331646-j5mkparg.txt