key: cord-035182-ax6v3ak5 authors: Griebenow, Reinhard; Mills, Peter; Stein, Jörg; Herrmann, Henrik; Kelm, Malte; Campbell, Craig; Schäfer, Robert title: Outcomes in CME/CPD - Special Collection: How to make the “pyramid” a perpetuum mobile date: 2020-10-27 journal: nan DOI: 10.1080/21614083.2020.1832750 sha: doc_id: 35182 cord_uid: ax6v3ak5 Continuing medical education (CME) should not be an end in itself, but as expressed in Moore’s pyramid, help to improve both individual patient and ultimately community, health. However, there are numerous barriers to translation of physician competence into improvements in community health. To enhance the effect CME may achieve in improving community health the authors suggest a kick-off/keep-on continuum of medical competence, and integration of aspects of public health at all levels from planning to delivery and outcomes measurement in CME. Continuing medical education (CME) should not be an end in itself, but as expressed in Moore's pyramid [1] , help to improve both individual patient and ultimately community health. However, although the concept of "ascent to the summit" [2] should not be misunderstood as meaning that only a few will be able to reach the peak of Mount Everest, we need to realise that there is no simple way of improving community health. As illustrated in Figure 1 , (1) Competence does not inevitably lead to Performance: • Due to national regulations and/or underfunding of (parts of) health-care systems, availability of treatment may be limited and/or unequally distributed in or between different countries [e.g. [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] . Resources to meet challenges such as Covid-19 may be insufficient: shortages in staff, beds in intensive care units, respirators or personal protective equipment have uniformly become the responsibility of physicians [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] . In particular in Europe, the existence of more than 25 health system jurisdictions in a relatively limited sized area, inevitably leads to a non-uniform picture of medical practice. (2) Appropriate performance will not always improve patient health due to: • variation in disease severity or even uncontrollable disease activity • variation in co-morbidities • lack of (informed) consent • patient non-compliance [e.g. [45] [46] [47] • secular changes in risk [48] or • regional/local differences in risk [e.g. [49] [50] [51] • treatment of patient groups excluded from published studies [e.g. 52] (e.g. elderly or patients with comorbidities), for whom the treatment effect has not been validated • health inequities [e.g. 53, 54] Considering community health adds a • quantitative dimension: In a theoretical scenario of, for example, a new pharmacological treatment, "level 4/5-CME" would form the competence needed to start ("kick-off-competence", Figure 1 ). But targeting community health, requires that CME is informed by results of community health research. This research forms the evidence base, which will keep the process going, and will ultimately lead to improvement of community health ("keep-oncompetence", s. Figure 1 ). However, if community (and public) health research should systematically be considered for CME, some important issues have to be addressed: What is a meaningful improvement of community health that CME providers should promote as a benchmark in their CME activities? Which role do surrogate endpoints play, in particular when a drug has been approved without evidence that it improves patient prognosis [55, 56] ? So far public health research has often been hampered by restrictions in accessibility of data. This may change for the better with the more widespread use of electronic health records [57] , though (at least in Europe) data protection regulations may still interfere with access to patient data [58] . Physicians probably always intend that theoretically "all" their (eligible) patients should benefit from, e.g., a new treatment. Therefore, is "100%" the benchmark? This has never been resolved in health-care system research, and Hagen et al. [62, 71] . Further investigation in this complex matter is needed clearly to delineate, to what extent community health effects can be attributed to physicians' primary medical motivation. • quantitative dimension: • Worldwide, physicians have claimed professional autonomy in building patient-physician relationships [72] . Currently, professional autonomy is most often affected by regulatory actions and commercial interests, in particular the pharmaceutical and medical device industry. Considering community health adds further to this list: though health insurance companies or hospital owners do not fall under the Accreditation Council for CME (ACCME) definition of a commercial interest [73] , they definitely have a distinct interest in how health-care should be delivered, and part of the health-care system research is based on their data [e.g. 74]. Thus, similar to activities to build "kick-offcompetence" we need to define independence of CME also for "keep-on-competence". This includes criteria for institutional conflicts of interest, and bias in content provided by the institutions mentioned above [75] ; the same also applies to regulators in state-driven health-care systems (e.g. NHS in the UK). • The maximum benefit for community health may only be achieved, if we optimise interdisciplinary, and interprofessional CME (and cooperation) [e. g. 76,77]. • Community (and public) health research has its own methodological framework, which needs to be addressed in building "keep-on-competence", and • it may have very different sources of information compared to what makes up "kick-offcompetence", which need to be validated in their role to inform "keep-on-competence [e.g. 78]. • Selection of Faculty in CME targeting community/public health should ideally include all stakeholders, including regulators, politicians, etc. (see also below) • But considering community health also reminds us of our role as expert citizens: Back in 1848, the German pathologist Rudolf Virchow, who had also been a member of the Berlin City Council and the Prussian Parliament for many years, had defined the relation between medicine and politics: "Medicine is a social science, and politics is nothing more than medicine on a large scale". In the context of CME and community health this highlights that we as physicians have the responsibility to make transparent to the community, as well as their politicians, that treatment of the individual patient will only become effective, if structural changes within the community are also taken. This interdependence of patient care and community care has recently been succinctly demonstrated during the current covid-19 pandemic [e.g. 53, 54, [79] [80] [81] . We may not be in the position of Rudolf Virchow, who (among others) initiated a sewer system for the City of Berlin, and regulation on obligatory assessment of Trichinae, binding for all butchers in Prussia, but today we still struggle to determine the red line beyond which, we as individual physicians can no longer be able to compensate for deficits, which may only be resolved by political action. Thus, CME targeting community health will inevitably be political, and should include all stakeholders in discussing progress and barriers in community health. This also highlights that choosing community health as top of the pyramid is appropriate, since for the large majority of physicians, the community is their professional reference level. However, there will remain issues which can only be resolved by political and subsequent legislative action. What are the implications for the concept of CME, and CME providers? Currently, CME is often planned according to the assumption that repetitively updating kick-offcompetence (typically focused on knowledge dissemination), will ultimately have an effect on patient as well as community health. On the one hand there is some evidence for the impact of this strategy on physician performance and patient outcomes [82] , but on the other hand this is not the appropriate strategy to address gaps in community health, and tends to create an attitude of unbalanced activism. It could thus be considered as "division of labour" to continue with "level 1-5" CME activities and stimulate (other) providers to organise more "level 6-7" CME. We should instead promote a different model: change the one-way ticket to a roundtrip, or: make keep-oncompetence the new kick-off-competence (s. Figure 1 ). To achieve this goal we need to: • define independence in community/public health research to ensure unbiased content • define which evidence is applicable to the particular community, i.e. introduce research methodology on a case by case basis into each CME activity [75] • make community health part of the needs assessment, content selection, and definition of outcomes • include community health/public health experts within Faculty • revise current time schedules, since including community health into CME will in most cases need more time than hitherto, also because • one of the biggest challenges for inclusion of community health into CME on a large scale will be that there is a substantial lack of data at the community level. Thus, inclusion of community health matters will probably less often follow a teacher-learner scenario, but will more be a discussion between peers. • revise (if applicable) "knowledge tests" as evaluation of CME, and introduce items with an impact on community health, which can be the more specific as detailed data related to community health are available. • find new ways to integrate community health into CME with primarily international audience (e.g. by presentations of local experts through video conferencing) What are the implications for CME accrediting bodies? Community health is the sum of the various forces working for and against community health. In targeting community health CME must therefore take responsibility for discussing all the pros and cons involved in improving community health. Current definitions of how to conduct accredited CME theoretically cover aspects of community health [83] . However, most CME currently does not deliberately address community health, since faculty, programme schedules, content, and outcomes, would have to be different in CME aimed at keep-on-competence. This would be accessible to external assessment (as part of the accreditation process), and thus even easier to assess than changes in language, management of data volume, or sources of information in CME [75, 84] . Worldwide, accrediting bodies are currently in the process of defining harmonised criteria for accreditation of CME [83] . How to better implement community health-orientated CME might become part of this project. Disclosure statements can be found under "supplementary material". Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities Ascent to the summit of the CME pyramid Can China's 'standard of care' for COVID-19 be replicated in Europe Availability and prices of medicines for non-communicable diseases at health facilities and retail drug outlets in Kenya: a cross-sectional survey in eight counties Infections Associated with Resterilized Pacemakers and Defibrillators Beschluss des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses über eine Änderung der Arzneimittel-Richtlinie (AM-RL): Anlage XII -Beschlüsse über die Nutzenbewertung von Arzneimitteln mit neuen Wirkstoffen nach § 35a SGB V -Evolocumab Geographic Access to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Centers in the USA. Insights From the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry Access to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Under New Medicare Surgical Volume Requirements Covid-19: doctors' visas are automatically extended for one year Covid-19: medical students should not work outside their competency, says BMA Protect our healthcare workers What healthcare professionals owe us: why their duty to treat during a pandemic is contingent on personal protective equipment (PPE) Whose life to save? Scarce resources allocation in the COVID-19 outbreak US ventilator crisis brings patients and doctors face-to-face with life-or-death choices Bayesian Interpretation of the EXCEL Trial and Other Randomized Clinical Trials of Left Main Coronary Artery Revascularization Should Percutaneous Coronary. Intervention Be Considered for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease? Insights From a Bayesian Reanalysis of the EXCEL Trial Characteristics of Contemporary Randomized Clinical Trials and Their Association With the Trial Funding Source in Invasive Cardiovascular Interventions Evidence for Overturning the Guidelines in Cardiogenic Shock Levels of Evidence Supporting American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology Guidelines Patent Foramen Ovale Closure-Closing the Door Except for Trials Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease in US Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals From Comparison of Patient-Reported vs Physician-Estimated Angina in Patients Undergoing Elective and Urgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Pharmacological treatment of depression: A systematic review comparing clinical practice guideline recommendations Variation in Ventilator Allocation Guidelines by US State During the Coronavirus Disease Level and Prevalence of Spin in Cardiovascular Clinical Trial Reports with Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Outcomes Industry sponsorship and research outcomes (Review) Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs Psychosocial consequences of false positives in the Danish Lung Cancer CT Screening Trial: a nested matched cohort study Statement on matching language to the type of evidence used in describing observational studies vs. randomized trials GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence Claims of "no difference" or "no effect" in Cochrane and other systematic reviews Perception of the binding nature of guideline recommendations Bindingness of recommendations in guidelines: survey on Perception among Guideline Developers A Randomized Study of How Physicians Interpret Research Funding Disclosures Information on new drugs at market entry: retrospective analysis of health technology assessment reports versus regulatory reports, journal publications, and registry reports Retraction-Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis Characteristics Associated With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests and Resuscitations During the Novel Coronavirus Disease Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic Admissions to Veterans Affairs Hospitals for Emergency Conditions During the COVID-19 Pandemic Excess Deaths From COVID-19 and Other Causes Measles Status-Barriers to Vaccination and Strategies for Overcoming Them Wald DS Adherence to Drugs That Prevent Cardiovascular Disease: meta-analysis on 376,162 Patients Disparities in Coronavirus 2019 Reported Incidence, Knowledge, and Behavior Among US Adults Introducing the 'Drucebo' effect in statin therapy: a systematic review of studies comparing reported rates of statinassociated muscle symptoms, under blinded and openlabel conditions Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibition in Stable Coronary Artery Disease Comparison of different cardiovascular risk score calculators for cardiovascular risk prediction and guideline recommended statin uses Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Cardiovascular risk algorithms in primary care: results from the DeteCt study Enrollment of Older Patients, Women, and Racial/ Ethnic Minority Groups in Contemporary Acute Coronary Syndrome Clinical Trials. A Systematic Review Disparities in the risk and outcomes of covid-19 Religious discrimination is hindering the covid-19 response Limitations in Clinical Trials Leading to Anticancer Drug Approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration An Overview of Cancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Based on the Surrogate End Point of Response Rate Thrombotic Stroke and Myocardial Infarction with Hormonal Contraception General Data Protection Regulation Prescription rates for antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease-which benchmark are we aiming at in continuing medical education? (JECME). ZJEC 1836866 Quality of Care after Acute Coronary Syndromes in a Prospective Cohort with Reasons for Non-Prescription of Recommended Medications Prescription Fill Patterns for Commonly Used Drugs During the Covid-19 Pandemic in the USA Covid-19-A Reminder to Reason Time course of change in prescription behaviour after targeted continuing medical education in a closed loop system of repeated standardised documentation and feedback Use of secondary prevention pharmacotherapy after first myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus Trends in Early Aspirin Use Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction in China Decade-Long Trends (2001 to 2011) in the Use of Evidence-Based Medical Therapies at the Time of Hospital Discharge for Patients Surviving Acute Myocardial Infarction The Effect of Malpractice Reform on Emergency Department Care Why aren't physicians prescribing more buprenorphine? Comparison of Payment Changes and Choosing Wisely Recommendations for Use of Low-Value Laboratory Tests in the USA and Canada Requests for futile treatments: what mechanisms play a role? Results of a qualitative study among Dutch physicians Mapping the drivers of overdiagnosis to potential solutions WMA Declaration of Seoul on Professional Autonomy and Clinical Independence Accreditation Council for CME Definition of a Commercial Interest Busse R: disease management programs for type 2 diabetes in Germany-a systematic literature review evaluating effectiveness Criteria to assess independence in continuing medical education (CME)-Independence through competence and transparency Interdisciplinary CME: is the need evident? Results of the evaluation of CME articles in the Journal of the German Medical Association Association of Symptoms of Depression With Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality in Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries Assessment of Beliefs and Attitudes About Statins Posted on Twitter A Qualitative Study Variation in COVID-19 Hospitalizations and Deaths Across New York City Boroughs Associations Between Built Environment, Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status, and SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Pregnant Women SARS-CoV-2 Positivity Rate for Latinos in the Baltimore-Washington, DC Region The impact of CME on physician performance and patient health outcomes: an updated synthesis of systematic reviews Cologne Consensus Conference: standards and Guidelines in Accredited CPD What does CME accreditation stand for?