key: cord-345779-frspku51 authors: Pinto, Antonio; Giurazza, Francesco; Califano, Teresa; Rea, Gaetano; Valente, Tullio; Niola, Raffaella; Caranci, Ferdinando title: Interventional radiology in gynaecology and obstetric practice: safety issues date: 2020-09-30 journal: Semin Ultrasound CT MR DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2020.09.004 sha: doc_id: 345779 cord_uid: frspku51 Interventional radiology is continuing to reshape current practice in many specialties of clinical care and the fields of gynaecology and obstetrics are no exception. Imaging skills, clinical knowledge as well as vascular and non-vascular interventional technical ability, are essential to practice interventional radiology effectively. Patient safety is of paramount importance in interventional radiology as in all branches of medicine. Potential failures occur throughout successful procedures and are attributed to a spectrum of errors, including equipment unavailability, planning errors, and communication errors. These are mainly preventable by improved preprocedural planning and teamwork. Of all the targeted and effective actions that can be undertaken to reduce adverse events, the use of safety checklists might have a prominent role. The advantage of a safety checklist for interventional radiology is that it guarantees that human error in terms of forgetting key steps in patient preparation, intraprocedural care, and postoperative care are not forgotten. Despite being a relative new branch in the world of medicine, in the last two decades, interventional radiology (IR) has broadly extended its range of applications, mainly as a result of the technological progress. Interventional radiologists use X-rays, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance or other imaging guidance to navigate small instruments, like catheters and needles, through blood vessels and organs to treat a variety of diseases. 1, 2 Examples of treatments administered by interventional radiologists include angioplasty, biopsies, stenting, thrombolysis, embolization and radiofrequency ablation. 1, [3] [4] [5] [6] In recent years, the transcatheter and percutaneous techniques of IR have been applied for the treatment of diseases of various organs and systems, including the female pelvis. [7] [8] [9] [10] Through improvement of new procedures and enhancement of standard techniques, the interventional radiologist can now offer many services to the obstetrician-gynecologist. [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] Regarding gynecological and obstetric diseases, interventional radiologists are very familiar with the pelvic vascular anatomy based on previous experience with embolization for pelvic trauma in addition to the growing experience with uterine fibroid embolization. 7, 16 Most of the interventional procedures are performed percutaneously with little associated patient discomfort and with conscious sedation instead of general anaesthesia. 17 In the gynecological field, transarterial embolization is used for treating uterine arterio-venous malformations ( Figure 1 ) and uterine myomas (Figure 2) . A modern approach of treating fibroids is also represented by image-guided thermal ablation with both percutaneous and no touch methods; transvenous embolization is instead an established therapy for pelvic congestion syndrome (Figure 3) . 3, 8, 12, 16, 18 In patients affected by gynecological malignancies, endovascular treatment of metrorrhagia could be a valid therapeutic alternative, especially in elderly patients with poor clinical conditions not suitable for surgery. A bilateral and superselective embolization using non-resorbable embolic agents should be performed, except for those cases in which there is infiltration of major vessels causing pseudoaneurysms or fistulas that require embolization. 19 In the obstetric field, transarterial uterine arteries embolization is a recognized procedure for the management of postpartum hemorrhage that is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality; new endovascular techniques are proposed also as preventive strategies before partum in patients at high risk, especially those with abnormal invasive placenta. 11, 20, 21, 22 Moreover, in case of ectopic/scar pregnancies, transarterial embolization combined or not with medical therapy has demonstrated to provide effective clinical results. Nonhemorrhagic emergencies in the antepartum and postpartum patient also include the diagnosis and treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolus, including inferior vena cava filter placement when appropriate. 14 For each of the aforementioned conditions, it is mandatory to appropriately select the patients suitable for IR treatments on the basis of both clinical data and imaging findings, working in cooperation with gynecologists. In IR, as in all medical disciplines, the need for improvements in patient safety is progressively being recognized. [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] Patient safety is the absence of preventable harm to a patient during the process of health care and reduction of risk of unnecessary harm associated with health care to an acceptable minimum. 24 In IR, knowledge of periprocedural care is critical for building a successful patientcentered practice. Periprocedural care with respect to image-guided intervention refers to the spectrum of patient care and management before, during and after a procedure. In this article, we discuss the different components of IR periprocedural care in gynaecology and obstetric practice with specific emphasis on patient safety. Perhaps one of the most critical, yet often overlooked, aspects of performing IR procedures is organization. A deficiency of correct planning and equipment unavailability have been shown to account for nearly one-third of errors in IR. 33, 34 While each interventional radiologist will have his or her own preferred organization techniques, there are several important factors to consider when a specific strategy should be decided. Modern IR suites should have one or two rooms built to operating room standards which includes laminar air flow, mandatory air exchanges, a positive in-suite pressure with respect to the surrounding rooms and corridors and appropriate flooring. The IR table must accommodate versatile positioning, in particular, head down tilt for emergencies ( Figure 5) . 35 Generally staffing of the IR suite itself requires one or more interventional radiologists, nurses, radiology technologists, and ancillary staff. Staffing is guided by patient safety and resource efficiencies. The anaesthesiologist is available for procedures requiring general anaesthesia or moderate-deep sedation in selected cases (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, intracranial vascular procedures, haemorrhagic urgencies, paediatric patients). 35, 36 Guidelines stated that each procedure required three personnel in addition to the physician: one to be scrubbed into the procedure along with the physician, one to circulate, and one to monitor the patient. In certain situations, four nonphysician health care practitioners may be needed per case. 30 IR physician and staff training and competency are an integral component of any successful IR program. Consistent, trained staff familiar with the standards of practice and particular care of patients undergoing a spectrum of IR procedures is crucial. IR staff members work as a team and are not interchangeable with nurses from other floors in the hospital or technologists from other areas in radiology. 30 A wedge is needed for pregnant patients. In emergency situations, control of postpartum hemorrhage frequently involves transfer of the post-natal woman to the IR suite for the insertion of catheters. In the elective situation, the site of the caesarean section after the procedure remains a topic of debate. If catheters are placed in the obstetric theatre, then an IR compatible table is necessary, but the radiological imaging quality through a C-arm is inferior. If catheters are placed electively in the radiology suite with subsequent transfer of the woman to obstetric theatre for the caesarean section, then there is a risk of sheath and catheter displacement during transport. 35 In fact, good communication among a multidisciplinary team consisting of the interventional radiologist, obstetrician, anesthesiologist, nursing, and ancillary staff is essential for the safe and efficient management of these patients. Specific issues that should be discussed include fetal monitoring (equipment and nursing staff), recovery location (immediate postprocedure and intermediate-term and long-term recovery), and resource availability in the event of an emergency delivery. 35 In case of pregnant patients, it is of paramount importance to strictly follow the SIR and CIRSE guidelines for the use of radiation during pregnancy. 37 Several measures should be applied to achieve an appropriate balance between image quality and radiation dose to the fetus. These measures include low-dose rate pulsed fluoroscopy with the lowest pulse rate allowed by the equipment, no angiography exposure, use of the "last image hold" to record the study and plan techniques, no enlargement of the field of view, use of a half-dose filter, posteroanterior beam projection, x-ray tube at maximal distance from the patient, and tube current as low as possible by keeping the tube potential as high as possible ( Figure 6) . Finally, the fluoroscopy beam-on time is one of the primary factors that the interventional radiologists have be controlled in order to reduce both patient and staff doses. 38 Another crucial topic related patient safety is represented by hand hygiene and sterile technique. 39 The prominence of hand hygiene for reducing infection rates in health care environments was first described by Semmelweis and Holmes in the mid-19th century. 40 Since interventional radiologists perform so many procedures as part of daily practice, it is crucial to appreciate the current guidelines for both hand Good aseptic technique represents a serious step in reducing procedure-related infections. Skin sites can be disinfected by using 2% chlorhexidine-based agents (preferred), tincture of iodine, or 70% alcohol and should be allowed to dry completely before starting the procedure. For most procedures, it is also appropriate to use either clean or sterile gloves or a sterile drape. Interventional Radiology is a branch of radiology that performs a wide range of vascular and extravascular procedures, which share three common factors: a percutaneous approach, minimal or reduced invasiveness and imaging guidance (angiography, fluoroscopy, ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance). An adverse event is one that results in unintended harm to the patient by an act of commission or omission, rather than by the underlying disease or condition of the patient. The term "adverse" does not imply whether the event may have been preventable (examples include a patient falling during transfer, contrast agent extravasation, a missed imaging finding, and a complication during an interventional procedure). 44 It has been estimated that 50% of all in-hospital adverse events are related to surgery and at least 50 % of these could be avoided because they are caused by errors. 45 Error is defined as "the failure of a planned action to be completed as intended (ie, error of execution) or the use of a wrong plan to achieve an aim (ie, error of planning)". 28 Literature in IR indicates that the majority of errors in IR are preventable. 46 IR procedures place the team in circumstances comparable to those experienced in operating theatres (persistent stress, operator tiredness, team inexperience) that can lead to mistakes: this explains the need to enhance patient safety measures through larger standardisation of procedures and enlarged quality of care in IR procedures. Moreover, in addition to the most commonly recognised errors in medicine, some errors are specific to IR and can potentially occur at any time during the patient's stay in the angiographic suite. 47 The American College of Radiology's Task Force on Patient Safety recommends a list of preventable patient errors. 48 When considering the human contribution to adverse events, safety researchers further distinguish between two kinds of error: active errors (or failures), which are commonly associated with errors committed by frontline operators, and latent errors (or conditions), which reflect inherent faults in processes, equipment, or organization that later emerge to contribute to a failure. 44, 47 Factors leading to error rarely occur in isolation and reflect a combination of events, including judgment errors, vigilance/memory failure, lack of technical competence, and communication breakdown. 49 Apart from the surgical risk itself, also the patients' stay and transfer to and from the operating theatre, the different health professionals involved in IR activity and the complexity of the procedures make the IR prone to error and therefore to adverse events. 50 In case of adverse event, it is necessary to perform a root cause analysis to estimate the causes and contributing factors. The analysis can reveal a deficiency of clarity regarding the organisation and specific duties of the several healthcare professionals working in the radiology suite (definition of roles) and the procedure for side identification. A root cause analysis consists of three fundamental components: (1) identification of factors most directly associated with the adverse event; (2) analysis and prioritization of these factors to design the introduction of effective strategies to prevent them from recurring; (3) introduction, management, and, wherever possible, dissemination of effective countermeasures that are shown to have a beneficial effect. 44 Checklists are an important tool for achieving standardization. Checklists safeguard consistency and team communication, thereby overcoming limitations in human memory and attention span. Checklists ensure that procedural steps are performed in the correct order and that the procedure is complete. 29 Starting from 2009, the World Health Organization developed its own Safety Surgical Checklist to standardise the surgical patient's pathway and enhance safety. This checklist led to a significant reduction in clinical adverse events and in morbidity and mortality caused by human error on patients during their stay in the operating room. 51 Subsequently the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe published its own safety checklist recommending its use in IR suites. 50, 52 IR procedures have many aspects in common with surgery (complexity, fast patient turnover, urgency and emergency procedures, multilevel or diffuse diseases, teamwork) and consequently carry a risk for potential error. Therefore, implementing the use of safety checklists in the IR suite could have the same usefulness in increasing patient safety as surgical safety checklists. Safety checklists provide a verification tool to support the interventional radiologists team, with the aim of facilitating adhesion to recommended patient safety standards and preventing avoidable adverse events. 52 A safety checklist can be used in different health-care environments because it includes the following three important safety goals: (1) improving accuracy in patient identification; (2) improving communication between health-care coworkers; (3) eliminating all wrong-site, wrong-patient and wrong-procedure interventions. 50 Table 1 shows a spectrum of crucial points of a patient safety list in IR. The checklist is not proposed to replace current good practice or protocols already in place but is an additional safeguard. The checklist is designed to act as a "pause" to reflect before embarking on any procedure that requires the insertion of a needle into a patient for the purpose of biopsy or intervention. 53 Morbi et al 25 Before any procedural intervention, every patient must be evaluated. The clinical indication and need for the requested procedure must be determined and weighed against other potentially appropriate management options for each patient. With the increasing importance of clinical activity in daily IR practice, interventional radiologists play a key role not only in performing medically needed procedures, but also in helping referring teams determine when a given IR procedure may not be indicated or when risks outweigh benefits. 54 After the patient's admission to the IR department, a radiologist usually checks the blood tests ordered for the requested procedure and verifies that the patient has received all information regarding the interventional procedure. Coagulation parameters and pharmacological therapy should be clearly investigated before the procedure; the coagulation status of patients undergoing image-guided interventions should be assessed whenever the procedure involves direct entry into the arterial or venous system as an anticipated part of the procedure or whenever there is a possibility of inadvertent entry into the arterial or venous system with significant-sized interventional devices or tools. 55 Before the patient enters the IR suite (preprocedural period), it is mandatory to check the following items: -the patient has discontinued anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy (when required). 50 These are items that can be easily forgotten on a busy day in the interventional suite, but their omission could result in potentially dreadful complications for the patient. 56 When the patient is prepared for the procedure in the IR suite (on the operating table, asleep, sedated or under locoregional anaesthesia), with all of the team in the room, it is important to verify: 1) that all the team members are present and all the radiological images required for the procedure are ready (if necessary); 2) that the patient data displayed on the angiography system are correct and up to date and correspond to the patient submitted to the interventional procedure; 3) patient's identity, surgical site, type and side (if required) of the procedure. 50 At the end of the procedure and before the patient leaves the angiography suite, a team member in the recovery room verifies that: -the nursing assessment and radiological report have been completed and attached to the patient's clinical record; -the acquired images have been correctly uploaded and sent to the PACS; -the biopsy or biological sample containers have been correctly labelled and the requests and forms for the pathology laboratory have been correctly completed. 50 Given that patient-centred decision making increasingly has been viewed as an eminent quality of care indicator, assessment of patients' desire for information about radiation exposure is imperative. [57] [58] [59] [60] Physicians have the responsibility to obtain informed consent from patients, and this involves the health care provider verbally explaining the risks and benefits of a procedure as well as alternative treatment options. Although the failure to do this properly is considered malpractice, and there is extensive difference on informed consent regulations internationally and among states, the practice of formalizing the informed consent process with a signed document has been worldwide embraced. 61, 62 Informed consent should be obtained for any procedure that exposes a patient to any substantial risk, including moderate sedation. Topics to discuss during the informed consent process may include the purpose and nature of the procedure, the technique of performing the procedure, procedural risks and potential complications, the estimated benefits, the risks of not performing the procedure, reasonable alternatives and likely risks and benefits, and the right to refuse the procedure. 40, 63, 64 Since the patient must be able to fully understand the consent process, the consent should be obtained before any sedation is administered. Finally, the necessary patient preparation for the treatment needs to be explained. 62 Radiologists must discuss their own procedures with patients; informed consent for radiological procedures cannot be left to clinicians. The interventional radiologist who performs the procedure (or a suitable delegate) should obtain the patient's consent, preferably on the evening before the procedure, unless there are remarkable circumstances and the patient should be allowed sufficient time to decide on or even to refuse the proposed interventional procedure. During the consent process, the patient and the patient's family should understand that the site of skin entry and the site of treatment may be different. 24 Moreover, effective communication is fundamental to a successful womaninterventional radiologist relationship; shifting the communication model to be more patient centered has been shown to improve both quality of care and patient satisfaction. 17, 65, 66 In emergency situations, the need for any immediate intervention must be documented in the patient's medical record, including situational details, the necessity for fast intervention, the magnitude of the situation, and the reason for not obtaining consent. If an intervention has a potential for higher levels of radiation, the risks of radiation-induced injuries should be included during the consent process: the medical record should note the estimated radiation dose received, and the patient should be advised of any potential radiation-related injuries with follow-up instructions. 57 Today interventional radiology procedures are an excellent alternative to surgical interventions in the management of gynecological and obstetric diseases. Interventional radiology is an invasive specialty with the potential for errors as with other invasive specialties. Proper organization and training is essential to any procedural specialty. While many aspects of IR are similar to that of surgery, most often, interventional radiologists are themselves required to set up equipment and organize the procedural table. The need for more standardization to improve patient safety and quality of care is increasingly being recognized in IR. Preprocedural planning and intraprocedural organization is important for time management, and more importantly, for patient safety. All interventional procedures require a time-out, which should observe the Joint Commission's universal protocol for preventing wrong site, wrong procedure, and wrong person surgery. Of all the targeted and effective actions that can be undertaken to reduce adverse events, the use of safety checklists might have a prominent role. The advantage of a safety checklist for IR is that it ensures that human error in terms of forgetting key steps in patient preparation, intraprocedural care, and postoperative care are not forgotten. Nowadays, the integration of checklists in digital patient information systems helps to develop more checklists capable of offering information and links to other sources. The development of a safety culture will be the most important factor in determining the real success of safety checklists and their overall effects on patient safety. Developing a culture of safety can be a difficult process, but through safety education, dedicated teams, behavioural interventions, and executive support culture can begin to change. Operating theatre with C-arm positioned for interventional procedures; the beam source is positioned below the patient and should be at maximum distance from the patient (white dotted arrow). Angiosuite with leaded X-ray protections (white arrow: low protection with leaded curtain; grey arrows: high protection with leaded curtain and leaded glass). Interventional radiology: a half century of innovation Evaluation of tablet ultrasound for routine abdominal interventional procedures Role of the interventional radiologist in treating obstetric-gynecologic pathology Transarterial embolization of peripheral high-flow arteriovenous malformation with ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx®): single-center 10-year experience Traumatic and spontaneous hemothorax due to intercostal arteries hemorrhage: what the interventional radiologist needs to know Role of interventional radiology in managing gastrointestinal bleedings Obstetric and gynecologic emergencies: a review of indications and interventional techniques Beyond hemostasis: spectrum of gynecologic and obstetric indications for transcatheter embolization Arterial bleeding in pelvic trauma: priorities in angiographic embolization Acute active bleedings after pelvic trauma: imaging and endovascular treatment Obstetric (nonfetal) complications Predelivery uterine arteries embolization in patients with placental implant anomalies: a cost-effective procedure Interventional radiology in pregnancy complications: indications, technique, and methods for minimizing radiation exposure Role of interventional procedures in obstetrics and gynecology Role of interventional radiology in obstetric and gynecological diseases Uterine fibroid embolization efficacy and safety: 15 years experience in an elevated turnout rate center The role of interventional radiology in obstetric and gynaecology practice Uterine artery embolization with gelfoam for acquired symptomatic uterine arterio venous shunting Severe metrorrhagia in patients with advanced gynecologic cancer: endovascular treatment benefits in acute and chronic setting Postpartum hemorrhage: what every radiologist needs to know Role of interventional radiology in treating obstetric haemorrhages Predelivery uterine arteries embolization in patients affected by placental implant anomalies Radiology and patient safety Quality improvement guidelines for preventing wrong site, wrong procedure, and wrong person errors: application of the joint commission "universal protocol for preventing wrong site, wrong procedure, wrong person surgery" to the practice of interventional radiology Reducing error and improving efficiency during vascular interventional radiology: im plementation of a preprocedural team rehearsal A checklist to improve patient safety in interventional radiology Developing a culture of safety in an imaging department Key concepts of patient safety in radiology Improving safety through human factors engineering Society of Interventional Radiology position statement: staffing guidelines for the interventional radiology suite Building a culture of safety in interventional radiology Working hypothesis for the drafting of ethical-deontological regulations in radiodiagnostics and interventional radiology Errors in imaging of emergencies in pregnancy Interventional radiology suite: a primer for trainees The parturient in the interventional radiology suite: new frontier in obstetric anaesthesia CIRSE standards of practice on analgesia and sedation for interventional radiology in adults Radiation management for interventions using fluoroscopic or computed tomographic guidance during pregnancy: a joint guideline of the Society of Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe with Endorsement by the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association Uterine artery embolization before delivery to prevent postpartum hemorrhage Hygiene precautions and the transmission of infections in radiology Periprocedural patient care Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections How to handle a COVID-19 patient in the angiographic suite Root cause analysis: learning from adverse safety events The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review Avoiding and managing error in interventional radiology practice: tips and tools The concept of error and malpractice in radiology Errors and malpractice in interventional radiology Sources of error in interventional radiology: how, why, and when Use of "Time-Out" checklist in interventional radiology procedures as a tool to enhance patient safety A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population Patient safety in interventional radiology: a CIRSE IR checklist Impact and culture change after the implementation of a preprocedural checklist in an interventional radiology department Othée B: Role of interventional radiology in the management of infection Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous imageguided interventions A Primer to understanding the elements of medical malpractice Quality improvement guidelines for recording patient radiation dose in the medical record Ethics policies and procedures in imaging and interventional radiology Informed consent for radiation in interventional radiology procedures Practical recommendations for the application of DE 59/2013 Physicians' liability in interventional radiology and endovascular therapy Informed consent for interventional radiology procedures: a survey detailing current European practice Use of contrast media in diagnostic imaging: medico-legal considerations Interventional radiology in the pregnant patient for obstetric and nonobstetric indications: organizational, anesthetic, and procedural issues Patient-centered radiology Improving the informed consent conversation: a standardized checklist that Is patient centered, quality driven, and legally sound FIGURES Figure 1 A 37-years-old lady with previous intracavitary maneuvers (one myoma ablation and two curettages) causing uterine arteriovenous malformations Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance in coronal plane shows a focused irregular enhancement of the uterine wall, partially involving the uterine cavity, corresponding to an AVM (A, white dotted circle). Superselective Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) of left uterine artery showing multiple tortuous and ectaticvessels with early venous wash-out (B, white dotted circle), angiographic finding of AVM. Superselective DSA of right uterine artery shows multiple tortuous and ectatic vessels with early venous wash-out (C, white dotted circle), corresponding to right refurnishment of the AVM; embolization cast of Onyx®18 of the left side (C, black arrow). Right hypogastric DSA showing exclusion of the AVM from the blood flow after bilateral uterine artery embolization; the embolization casts are indicated by black arrows (D).