key: cord-254874-ug0ler5e authors: Ramos-Rincón, José M.; Pinargote-Celorio, Héctor; Belinchón-Romero, Isabel; González-Alcaide, Gregorio title: A snapshot of pneumonia research activity and collaboration patterns (2001–2015): a global bibliometric analysis date: 2019-09-05 journal: BMC Med Res Methodol DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0819-4 sha: doc_id: 254874 cord_uid: ug0ler5e BACKGROUND: This article describes a bibliometric review of the scientific production, geographical distribution, collaboration, impact, and subject area focus of pneumonia research indexed on the Web of Science over a 15-year period. METHODS: We searched the Web of Science database using the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) of “Pneumonia” from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2015. The only document types we studied were original articles and reviews, analyzing descriptive indicators by five-year periods and the scientific production by country, adjusting for population, economic, and research-related parameters. RESULTS: A total of 22,694 references were retrieved. The number of publications increased steadily over time, from 981 publications in 2001 to 1977 in 2015 (R(2) = 0.956). The most productive country was the USA (38.49%), followed by the UK (7.18%) and Japan (5.46%). Research production from China increased by more than 1000%. By geographical area, North America (42.08%) and Europe (40.79%) were most dominant. Scientific production in low- and middle-income countries more than tripled, although their overall contribution to the field remained limited (< 15%). Overall, 18.8% of papers were the result of an international collaboration, although this proportion was much higher in sub-Saharan Africa (46.08%) and South Asia (23.43%). According to the specific MeSH terms used, articles focused mainly on “Pneumonia, Bacterial” (19.99%), followed by “Pneumonia, Pneumococcal” (7.02%) and “Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated” (6.79%). CONCLUSIONS: Pneumonia research increased steadily over the 15-year study period, with Europe and North America leading scientific production. About a fifth of all papers reflected international collaborations, and these were most evident in papers from sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0819-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains the primary cause of death from infectious disease globally, and its high impact on morbidity and mortality is especially concentrated in children under five and the elderly [1, [4] [5] [6] . The World Health Organization (WHO) predicted that deaths from lower respiratory tract infections would remain among the top four causes of deaths up to at least 2030 [7] . Antibiotic-resistant strains have also been on the rise, although resistance does not appear to be related to mortality. However, pneumonia is associated with high rates of hospitalization and length of hospital stay. Moreover, it has considerable long-term effects on quality of life, and long-term prognosis is worse in patients with pneumococcal pneumonia [1] . Despite the public health importance of the disease, few studies have evaluated research in the area using bibliometric methods. Indeed, only Head et al. (2015) have analyzed publications on pneumonia, and their work was limited in geographical scope to the UK [8, 9] . In this study, by analyzing scientific papers on pneumonia published in the main international scientific journals, we aimed to identify the scientific contribution of different countries to the worldwide research effort, the most cited landmark articles, the degree and nature of scientific collaboration, and the topics addressed. This bibliometric description can provide relevant information for researchers in the field, particularly new scientists, giving a snapshot of strong research areas in pneumonia and global health as well as possible gaps requiring additional investments [10] [11] [12] . The paper also provides clues for addressing the weaknesses observed, such as the need to promote North-South collaborations and other research initiatives with countries that have relatively little scientific development on the topic [9, 13] . The aim of the present study is to assess the scientific literature on pneumonia that is indexed in the Web of Science (WoS). Specifically, we will analyze: (1) the evolution of scientific production; (2) its distribution by countries and regions; (3) the impact of the research papers; and (4) the degree of international collaboration. Finally, we will present details on the subject area focus of different publications according to the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). For the performance of the study, we opted to identify documents about pneumonia by means of the MeSH thesaurus in the MEDLINE database because this is a detailed instrument for controlled terminology. The thesaurus employs both a human team of specialist indexers to analyze each article and assign medical subject headings to it, plus automated processes to improve indexing; the result is a highly consistent system of classification for research topics [14] [15] [16] . The pneumonia descriptor was introduced in 1963 as a disease of the respiratory tract and the lung, and it was defined as "infection of the lung often accompanied by inflammation" [17] . Synonyms of this descriptor (and therefore also included in search results) are "Lung Inflammation" and "Pulmonary Inflammation". Additional file 1: Table S1 shows the MeSH tree structure for "Pneumonia". The next step was to identify the documents assigned with the MEDLINE descriptor of "pneumonia" indexed in the WoS. This body of research constitutes the population of documents for the present study. Conceived by Eugene Garfield but now maintained by Clarivate Analytics, WoS is the top scientific citation search and analytical information platform worldwide, serving both as a multidisciplinary research tool supporting a variety of scientific tasks and as a dataset for large, dataintensive studies [18] . The use of the WoS databases enables the analysis of all institutional affiliations reported in the documents and the calculation of citation indicators. The WoS brings together the most visible literature at a global level. These qualities justify its choice as the database platform used in this study despite some limitations related to covering non-English biomedical journals [18] . Although initially no limitations were imposed on our search, to calculate the bibliometric indicators we considered only two types of documents, articles and reviews, as these are the primary references for researchers. The study period was limited to 2001-2015, as delays associated with assigning MeSH descriptors to documents mean that information on the most recent articles on pneumonia is not updated. The searches took place on the Clarivate Analytics WoS platform, which includes MEDLINE database, on March 20, 2018. For each of the retrieved documents, data on the following bibliographic characteristics were extracted: year of publication, journal of publication and WoS subject category, document type, authorship, citations, institutional affiliation(s), and MeSH descriptors. Data were then standardized: institutional affiliations corresponding to England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales were grouped together under "United Kingdom," while affiliations in Overseas France, British Overseas Territories, and island dependencies were also assigned to their ruling countries (for example, the documents signed by authors from French Polynesia, Guadeloupe, Martinique, New Caledonia, and Reunion were assigned to France), although regional designations correspond to geographical rather than political criteria. Scientific production from Taiwan, which in WoS is considered independently from the Democratic Republic of China (China) but whose status is disputed at an international level, was analyzed separately. Countries responsible for publications were categorized according to their World Bank classification by income level: low-income (< USD 1025), lower-middleincome (USD 1026 to USD 4035), upper-middle-income (USD 4036 to USD 12, 475) , and high-income (≥ USD 12,476) countries. Each of the countries identified was assigned to a macro geographical (continental) region according to the groups established by the World Bank based on geopolitical and economic criteria and reflected in the World Bank Country and Lending Groups (see Additional file 1: Tables S2 and S3) [19] . Two kinds of indicators were obtained: Descriptive indicators for the evolution of scientific production Production by country, adjusted for demographic and economic parameters as well as for human resources dedicated to research activities We determined standardized indicators for each country's productivity with respect to: -Population: number of publications per million inhabitants (population index). Data were obtained from World Development Indicators in the World Bank online databases [20] . We calculated a mean value for each indicator based on available data from the study period. The analysis was limited to countries participating in the top 30 articles in the field of pneumonia in order to facilitate comparison between countries' scientific production, demographic indicators, and economic development. Results for the top 15 articles are shown in the main text, while those for the top 30 are provided in Additional file 1. We calculated the following citation indicators by journal, country, and geographic region: -Citation of the publications. Absolute number of citations received. -Citation rate (CR). Number of citations divided by number of publications. -Hirsch index (h-index). The H-index is a semiqualitative proxy measure to assess the impact of an author's or country's research output on the scientific community [21] . An h-index of 12 indicates that 12 out of 12 published papers have been cited at least 12 times. In order to assess the differences in the distributions of the publications according to the prestige of the journals, we performed a specific analysis of a sub-sample of publications in journals occupying the top 10% in the impact factor ranking in their respective subject categories in the Journal Citation Reports (2015 edition). We analyzed participation in these "prestigious journals" according to geographical location (regions and countries), collaboration level and number of citations. We calculated the percentage of documents produced in international collaboration and the evolution by quinquennium in order to estimate the scope of cooperative practices at a global level, considering the whole population of documents analyzed (research field) by country and geographic region. To specifically analyze collaboration between countries, collaboration networks were generated for each of the three quinquenniums using Pajek software. To specifically analyze collaboration between countries, collaboration networks were generated for each of the three quinquenniums using Pajek software. The collaboration network is a graphic representation (graph), wherein the nodes represent authors' countries (as determined from their institutional affiliations) and links between the nodes represent coauthorships between countries, that is, an international collaboration in published research. The more intense the collaboration, the thicker the links between the nodes. The spatial distribution of the nodes responds to the execution of the kamada-kawai algorithm in Pajek, which places the most prominent nodes (those with a greater number of documents and collaboration links) in the center of the map, and the nodes with a smaller number of publications and degree of collaboration towards the periphery. Based on an analysis of MeSH terms, we identified the main research focus of the studies in the area, generating density maps using the VOSviewer program with a spatial description of the main MeSH terms for each type of pneumonia [22] : (A) "Pneumonia, Aspiration" (B) "Pneumonia, Bacterial," (C) "Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated," (D) "Pneumonia, Viral," and (E) "Pneumonia, Pneumocystis"). The process of generating and interpreting the maps proceeded as follows: -Determination of the co-occurrence of the descriptors assigned to the documents and generation of a matrix of absolute values. The joint assignment of two descriptors in a single document implies a thematic affinity, as both aspects are addressed simultaneously in the same paper. This affinity will be more intense as it is repeated a greater number of times in the collection of documents analyzed. -Elimination of generic descriptors. In order to facilitate the analysis, we eliminated some excessively generic descriptors (like "humans" or "animals"), along with geographical descriptors and those related to age groups. These descriptors showed very high-density relationships, complicating the analysis and the interpretation of the results, so we analyzed their frequency more specifically. -Visual representation of the network. To establish the main topics that exist for each type of pneumonia and to represent them visually, we used a clustering algorithm in the VOSViewer program, which helps to detect the communities (clusters) within a network, made up of groups of homogeneous items that are strongly related to each other. The different groupings, in the form of "islands" in red tones, represent the main clusters of the thematic networks, while the chromatic gradation illustrates the areas with a lower density of relations between the MeSH in yellow and green tones. The spatial distribution of the MeSH and their proximity to each other responds to the intensity of co-occurrence between them. All data used to perform the study, including the information downloaded from the database as well as that derived from the treatment of the bibliographic entries, are available in the Dataverse Project, an open access public repository [23] (https://dataverse.harvard.edu/, doi: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/02BUNE). Due to the nature of the study and dataset, it was not necessary to obtain informed consent or approval from an institutional ethics committee. The search yielded a total of 33,944 documents published between 2001 and 2015 and assigned with the descriptor "Pneumonia" in the MEDLINE database. Of these, 27,017 (79.59%) were indexed in the WoS Core Collection Databases; 20,918 (77.14%) of them were classified as articles and 1776 (6.57%) as reviews. Thus, the population of study documents was a dataset of 22,694 articles and reviews, which we used to calculate the indicators presented below. Letters (N = 2213; 8.19%), editorials (N = 1, 998; 7.39%), news (N = 58; 0.21%), proceedings (N = 17; 0.06%) and other document types (N = 31, 0.11%) were excluded from the analysis. The number of publications rose from 981 in 2001 to 1977 in 2015.The evolution of scientific production by year was fitted to a linear growth model, showing an R 2 value of 0.956. Overall, the study period saw a two-fold increase in scientific production (Additional file 1: Figure S1 ). The country with the greatest number of documents was the USA (38.49%), followed at some distance by the UK (7.18%), Japan (6.97%), Germany (6.80%) and France (6.73%). Table 1 shows the number of documents and the evolution of scientific production in the 15 most productive countries by quinquennium (see Additional file 1: Table S4 for results on the top 30 countries). Although the USA ranks first in all periods, its relative contributions have declined, from 41.13% of all documents in 2001-2005 to 36.52% in 2011-2015. On the other hand, China's emergence is highly notable, with a 1.13% share of total scientific production in the first period (rank = 22), compared to a 8.44% share in the third (rank = 2). South Korea has also seen considerable growth, contributing just 1.30% to total research production in 2001-2005 (rank = 19) but 3.21% in 2011-2015 (rank = 12). Likewise, Taiwan and Brazil have increased their production from 1.17 and 1.35%, respectively, to 3.02 and 3.19%. Scientific production in different countries and geographic regions, and its evolution by quinquennium, is concentrated in North America and Europe & Central Asia; together these regions are responsible for 82. Table 2 ) (see Additional file 1: Figure S2 for a visual representation of density equalizing mapping projections). Table 3 ranks the production of the top 15 countries, adjusted for demographic and economic indicators (see Additional file 1: Table S5 for results on the top 30 countries). When normalized by population, the most productive countries were Switzerland, the Netherlands, Iceland, and Denmark. Adjusted for the GDP index, the most productive LMICs were the Gambia, Malawi, Uganda, and Guinea Bissau. If we calculate the ratio of pneumonia publications to GNI per capita index, the USA, China, India, Malawi y Brazil were the most productive. Adjusting by R&D expenditure index, the USA ranked first, followed by Spain, the UK, China, and Italy. In relation to the researchers in R&D index, the USA also leads the ranking, followed by India, Uganda, and China. (see Additional file Figure S3 and Figure S4 for a visual representation of density equalizing mapping projections of the number of documents and world development indicators, by GNI per capita index, GDP index and population index plus R&D expenditure index). Figure 1 shows the collaboration networks between different countries by quinquennium. The most prominent countries in all time periods, occupying central positions in the networks with multiple cooperative links, are the USA, Canada, the UK, Germany, France, and the Netherlands. The presence of South American and African countries is scarce in all periods. Only South Africa has a notable presence in the third quinquennium (Fig. 1a) . A few other countries also "emerge" with a high degree of collaborative links in the second period, like Spain, Greece, Italy, Australia, China, and Japan, although the latter two countries are not fully integrated in global networks, showing collaborative ties only with the USA (Fig. 1b) . Finally, other European countries, while present throughout all three periods, stand out to a greater degree in the third period. This is the case of Sweden, Switzerland, Belgium, and Austria. At the same time, China and Japan seem more implicated in the network in this third period, while India and South Korea also gain relevance (Fig. 1c) . The documents we analyzed were published in 2115 scientific journals. Twelve journals accounted for 16.63% of the pneumonia literature Table 6 Table S8 for results on the top 30 journals with highest absolute and relative citations). The comparative analysis of the scientific production and CRs of different journals is noteworthy in that some journals (such as the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care, Critical Care Medicine, and Intensive Care Medicine) present a very high CR in relation to their total scientific production (Additional file 1: Figure S5 for the top 15 journals producing the most research on pneumonia, plus citation rates). With regard to the subject categories to which the journals are assigned, the most prominent are "Infectious Diseases" (17.57% of the documents), "Respiratory System" (15.77%), "Immunology" (14.08%), "Microbiology" (11.85%), and "Critical Care Medicine" (9.26%) Table 7 . Many of the most productive journals in pneumonia also fall into these subject categories. Moreover, over the course of the three study periods, nearly all of the subject categories saw a moderate decrease in their relative contribution, as research articles became more dispersed and made headway into different disciplines producing less research on pneumonia Table 7 . The analysis of the 4100 documents published in the top 10% of prestigious journals shows a higher participation from the USA (27.66%, compared to 38.49% in the overall body of documents) and from some other European countries like the UK or Spain. In contrast, the weight of Asian countries, particularly Japan and China, is much lower (Table 8) . Overall, international collaboration in these journals (N = 1065, 25.98%) was sensibly higher than in the overall body of documents (18.8%), and the greater degree of collaboration was much more pronounced for countries like Brazil, Japan, China, and even European countries like Italy and Germany ( Table 8 ). The high degree of collaboration was also confirmed between regions in the publications appearing in these journals (Table 9 ). With regard to the degree of citation, we observed notable increases in the citation rate of the USA and the European countries; these were even more significant for countries in the Middle East & North Africa, and for sub-Saharan Africa when they participated in these journals ( Table 9 ). With regard to types of pneumonia studied, the MeSH terms to appear most frequently were "Pneumonia, Bacterial" (19.99%), followed by "Pneumonia, Pneumococcal" (7.02%), and "Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated" (6.79%). Table 10 shows the number of documents assigned to each term describing the different types of pneumonia (Additional file 1: Table S10 for the 30 top general MeSH). Table 11 ranks the top 15 countries in crude numbers of retrieved articles, stratified by types of pneumonia (Additional file 1: Table S11 for information on the 30 most productive countries). For "Pneumonia, Aspiration", the main countries were the USA, Japan, and Germany; for "Pneumonia, Bacterial", the USA, France, and Spain; for "Pneumonia, Pneumocystis", the USA, France, and the UK; for "Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated", the USA, France, and Spain; and for "Pneumonia, Viral", the USA, China, and Japan. Table 12 shows the relationship between MeSH terms referring to age groups with those corresponding to different types of pneumonia. The closest associations for "Aged, 80 and over" and "Aged" were with "Pneumonia, Aspiration" (22.58 and 40.56%, respectively), while "Pneumonia, Viral" was the most frequent topic for studies in pre-adults ("Infant", "Child", "Child, preschool" and "Adolescent"). The one exception to this was "Infant, newborn", where the highest proportion of articles was about "Pneumonia, Pneumocystis." In "Adult" and "Middle aged" people, studies most frequently focused on "Pneumonia, Bacterial" and "Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated." Figure 2 shows the subject area maps with the main MeSH terms in the documents on (a) "Pneumonia, Aspiration"; (b) "Pneumonia, Bacterial"; (c) "Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated"; (d) "Pneumonia, Viral"; and (e) "Pneumonia, Pneumocystis." The principal MeSH term related to "Pneumonia, Aspiration" is "Deglutition Disorder", but research is linked to a broad array of topics, including epidemiological aspects ("Incidence", "Risk Factor", "Retrospective Studies"), treatment approaches in intensive care, and surgical techniques procedures facilitating breathing, swallowing, and feeding (Fig. 2a) . The two main MeSH terms that appear most frequently with "Pneumonia, Bacterial" are "Community-acquired Infections" and "Anti-bacterial Agents", reflecting the central focus that research has taken to identify risk factors and test different therapeutic approaches. MeSH terms related to specific bacteria and infections, such as Streptococcus, Chlamydia, Acinetobacter, and Haemophilus influenzae, are also prominent (Fig. 2b) . For its part, research on "Pneumonia, Ventilatorassociated" seems more disperse, although three areas of interest can clearly be differentiated: (a) epidemiological studies, clinical protocols, and treatment in intensive care units (the term "Intensive Care Unit" is the most prominent in this area); (b) treatment outcomes ("Treatment outcome" and "Anti-Bacterial Agents"); and (c) cross infections ("Cross infection") (Fig. 2c) . Research on "Pneumonia, Viral" also shows a disperse nature, with different areas of interest. Epidemiological aspects are covered under terms such as "Communityacquired Infections" and "Hospitalization", while at a researcher level, interests reside in the virus "Influenza, Human" and "Orthomyxoviridae Infections" (Fig. 2d) . With regard to "Pneumonia, Pneumocystis", one prominent subject focus is on "AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections" and another is on "Pneumocystis jirovecii" (Fig. 2e ). Our analysis shows that the number of publications on pneumonia increased notably over the study period, with annual research outputs doubling from 2001 to 2015. Different factors may have contributed to this. The first of these is the growing research relevance of pneumonia as a clinical entity, as this disease is one of the community-acquired infections with the highest incidence and is an important cause of hospital admissions. It is also associated with a high global burden of morbidity and mortality in both children and adults [1] [2] [3] 24] . The second potential factor relates to advances in basic immunological and microbiological research along with deepening knowledge on the pathogenesis of the disease with regard to aspects like microbiological resistance and preventive interventions (e.g. vaccines) [25] . Thirdly, increased funding has been directed toward research and particularly "proactive investments for emerging infectious threats" [8, 9] , and finally, the increase in scientific production could be related to scientific development and international dissemination of scientific research in the WoS databases. This is particularly the case of China and other emerging economies like Brazil, where the rates of growth were highest relative to their respective regions [26] [27] [28] . We observed a substantial increase in research worldwide, but particularly in some geographical regions and countries of South Asia, East Asia & the Pacific, Latin America & and the Caribbean, and sub-Saharan Africa. To a great extent, this increase is simply a reflection of the limited contribution to global research that these countries made in the first period analyzed (2001) (2002) (2003) (2004) (2005) . The bulk of scientific production continues to come from countries with more economic and scientific development in Europe and North America (together, these countries participated in 77% of all publications). Despite the striking increase in scientific production across LMICs, the relative contribution to pneumonia research remains very modest, and the fact that some countries rank highest in demographic and economic indicators may not be a positive feature, but rather a reflection of the scant development in their scientific systems. Furthermore, the increase in international collaboration could have played a role in these indicators, multiplying the assignment of articles to different countries and possibly inflating some values, masking the real contribution of countries with less scientific development in research activities [29] . The USA is undoubtedly the main reference for pneumonia researchers in quantitative terms, as it produces by far the largest volume of publications-four times that of the next most productive country in the last period. Other European countries with important scientific systems (e.g. the UK, Germany, France, and Spain), along with other countries like Japan, Canada, China, India, and Brazil, also stand out in relation to some of the indicators of scientific production and economic development (GNI per capita index, and R&D expenditure Index). The other significant aspect in the analysis of how scientific production evolved over the study period is the emergence of China, which in the last period of study (2011) (2012) (2013) (2014) (2015) trailed only the USA in research output. This growth has come about in large part from the investments and scientific policies to foster openness that have been implemented over the past several decades to promote internationalization [30, 31] . The level of international scientific collaboration that we have observed in the field of pneumonia (19%) is below that seen in other areas of knowledge [11, 29, 30, [32] [33] [34] [35] . Thus, even though the trend is toward increased international cooperation, rising from 14 to 22% over the study period, implementing new strategies that favor collaboration is still necessary [11] . Initiatives promoting research could include those launched by international organizations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which have both invested considerable resources to investigate the etiology of childhood pneumonia in low-income countries [36] [37] [38] . However, these initiatives [40] are also collaborating in different projects related to HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria, and these organizations are largely responsible for the important degree of collaboration between European and sub-Saharan African countries [41] . Research for operational health services is necessary to improve the distribution and accessibility of pneumonia treatments, including antibiotics in primary healthcare centers and oxygen in hospitals. Likewise, new vaccines still need to be developed for strains of pneumococcus that current multivalent conjugate vaccines do not protect against [8] . In addition to programs focused on financing and implementing collaborative North-South and South-South projects, other efforts could be directed toward reducing obstacles associated with publication processes Fig. 2 Subject area maps with the main MeSH terms associated with different types of pneumonia-(a) "Pneumonia, Aspiration" (b) "Pneumonia, Bacterial, " (c) "Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated, " (d) "Pneumonia, Viral, " and (e) "Pneumonia, Pneumocystis" Groupings in the form of "islands" in red tones represent the main clusters of the thematic networks, while the chromatic gradation in yellow and green tones illustrates the areas with a lower density of relations between the MeSH. The spatial distribution of the MeSH and their proximity to each other responds to the intensity of co-occurrence between them that limit the dissemination of LMICs through the main international scientific journals. The literature has described obstacles related to linguistic skills and methodological deficiencies, which highlights the need to improve these areas in particular [42, 43] . Other authors have pointed to the costs associated with publishing in open access journals, so it is worth assessing whether the programs to support open access publishing implemented at an institutional level and by publishers such as PLOS, Biomed Central, or The Lancet Journals, are sufficient [44] [45] [46] . With regard to the impact of research, although Europe and North America are balanced in terms of the absolute number of citations, North America holds an advantage in terms of the citation rate. Research from sub-Saharan Africa also has a very high citation rate, which almost reaches that achieved in Europe. The fact that these African countries present a high degree of collaboration with researchers in the USA and Europe, who represent the "mainstream" international research interests, could help explain the high citation rates seen in this region. On the other hand, Latin America & Caribbean, South Asia, and East Asia & Pacific are all regions with generally lower citation rates, although this difference is not so pronounced in the case of papers produced in collaboration, as reported elsewhere [47] . By country, the hegemony of the USA and several European countries in terms of the number of citations received was evident, as was the lower ranking of some Asian countries, such as Japan and China, in relation to their scientific production. The positioning of China as a reference for scientific production and participation in international research networks does not correspond to its ranking with regard to citation indicators, despite their improved standing over the past several years [30] . On these indicators, China still lags behind the USA as well as the leading European countries, Canada, Australia and even nearby countries such as Japan. For now at least, the countries that have traditionally occupied the "mainstream" of scientific research still maintain their hegemony [48] . As with the relative indicators of scientific production adjusted for economic and demographic parameters, some countries surpass the major scientific systems with regard to the citation rate, which links the degree of citation with the volume of scientific production [33] . These countries may have participated in certain highly relevant contributions, or they may be small countries with highly developed scientific systems, such as Vietnam, Switzerland, South Africa, New Zealand, and Saudi Arabia. These countries also stand out for their high levels of international collaboration, which is a factor associated with more citations. The high mean citations received by publications produced in sub-Saharan Africa, and the participation of different emerging countries like Vietnam and South Africa in some of the highest cited papers we identified, underlines the capacity of these countries to contribute to high-impact and excellent-quality scientific studies. This result is consistent with previous studies that have also demonstrated these countries' capacity to participate in emerging research topics [49] . These specialists therefore represent an excellent asset, strengthening the human capital from high-income countries and enabling the advancement of research [50, 51] . In general, the most prestigious journals show a greater concentration of research from the USA and Europe, with greater collaboration and impact when countries from other geographical regions also participate [52] . Bacterial pneumonia is the main branch for the multidisciplinary and multipathological MeSH of "Pneumonia", with the main areas of interest ("Community-acquired Infections", "Anti-bacterial Agents" and "Treatment Outcome") reflecting the focus of research on identifying risk factors and assessing different treatments and their outcomes. In publications pertaining to the MeSH "Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated," the main axes of the subject content according to the MeSH terms were the group of epidemiological studies and clinical and treatment protocols in intensive care. "Pneumonia Pneumocystis," is closely related to infection due to HIV and immunodepression. The main areas of research interest for "Pneumonia, Viral," were the epidemiological aspects related to the setting for the infection ("Community-acquired Infections" and "Hospitalization") along with the viruses responsible ("Influenza, Human" and "Orthomyxoviridae Infections"). Finally, for the MESH "Pneumonia, Aspiration" the main research focus is "Deglutition Disorder". The main limitation of this present study is its analysis of only the documents included in the WoS databases and MEDLINE (80% of the documents). Thus, a number of papers were excluded from the study, particularly those written in languages other than English, as well as the proceedings included in WoS, as our searches were based on the journals included in MEDLINE. On the other hand, our approach also allowed us to precisely characterize collaboration in the area, as only recently has MEDLINE begun to include all the institutional affiliations of the authors. We were also able to analyze the citations of the publications, with a focus on the journals with the highest impact and dissemination at an international level [28] . In conclusion, pneumonia research increased steadily over the 15-year study period, with Europe and North America leading scientific production. About a fifth of all papers reflected international collaborations, and these were most evident in papers from sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Additional file 1: Table S1 . Descriptors included under the MeSH "Pneumonia" in PubMed. Table S11 . Top 30 countries in crude numbers of retrieved articles in "Pneumonia, Aspiration", "Pneumonia, Bacterial", "Pneumonia Pneumocystis", "Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated", and "Pneumonia, Viral" MeSH. Figure S1 . Evolution of scientific production on pneumonia (2001) (2002) (2003) (2004) (2005) (2006) (2007) (2008) (2009) (2010) (2011) (2012) (2013) (2014) (2015) . Clinical and economic burden of communityacquired pneumonia among adults in Europe Burden of community-acquired pneumonia in north American adults Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study Impact of age and comorbidity on cause and outcome in communityacquired pneumonia The burden of community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly: the Spanish EVAN-65 study Burden of pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia in adults across Europe: a literature review All cause mortality estimates for 2000-2016. WHO Mapping pneumonia research: a systematic analysis of UK investments and published outputs 1997-2013 Investments in respiratory infectious disease research 1997-2010: a systematic analysis of UK funding Scientometrics analysis of research activity and collaboration patterns in Chagas cardiomyopathy Evolution of Cooperation Patterns in Psoriasis Research: Co-Authorship Network Analysis of Papers in Medline Bibliometric analysis of leishmaniasis research in Medline (1945-2010) Investment in pneumonia and pneumococcal research Medical subject headings used to search the biomedical literature MeSH now: automatic MeSH indexing at PubMed scale via learning to rank years on -is the NLM medical text indexer still useful and relevant? MeSH datebase: Pneumonia Web of science use in published research and review papers 1997-2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis World Bank Country and Lending Groups World Bank Open Data. The World Bank An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping Replication data for: mapping global pneumonia research: a systematic analysis of scientifical production Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since A distinct lineage of CD4 T cells regulates tissue inflammation by producing interleukin 17 Characterization and complete genome sequence of a novel coronavirus, coronavirus HKU1, from patients with pneumonia Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses Coverage and quality: a comparison of web of science and Scopus databases for reporting faculty nursing publication metrics Inflationary bibliometric values: the role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies BRICS countries and scientific excellence: a bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers In-depth analysis on China's international cooperation in science Dominance and leadership in research activities: collaboration between countries of differing human development is reflected through authorship order and designation as corresponding authors in scientific publications Respiratory syncytial virus: a systematic scientometric analysis of the global publication output and the gender distribution of publishing authors Human T-lymphotropic virus 1 (HTLV-1) and human T-lymphotropic virus 2 (HTLV-2): geographical research trends and collaboration networks Density equalizing mapping of the global tuberculosis research architecture The Pneumonia Etiology Research for Child Health Project: a 21st century childhood pneumonia etiology study Gates annual letter. Our Big Bet For The Future Gatenotes Background Paper 6 -Priority Diseases and Reasons for Inclusion. BP 6.15 -Depression. WHO The bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's grant-making programme for global health European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP): the path towards a true partnership Bibliometric assessment of European and sub-Saharan African research output on poverty-related and neglected infectious diseases from Publication bias -a reason for the decreased research output in developing countries Geography of Africa biomedical publications: an analysis of 1996-2005 PubMed papers BMC: APC waivers and discounts Secondary instructions for authors Nassi-Calò L. Articles by latin american authors in prestigious journals have fewer citations Bibliometrics evaluation of research performance in pharmacology/pharmacy: China relative to ten representative countries Scientometric research assessment in the developing world: a tribute to Michael J. Moravcsik from the perspective of the twentyfirst century Experiences and perceptions of south--south and north--south scientific collaboration of mathematicians, physicists and chemists from five southern African universities The impact of African science: a bibliometric analysis Differences in citation rates by country of origin for papers published in top-ranked medical journals: do they reflect inequalities in access to publication? Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Meggan Harris in translating our manuscript from Spanish.Authors' contributions JMRR: study conception, study, design, data analysis, manuscript writing and final manuscript approval; HPC: data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing and final manuscript approval; IBR: study conception, manuscript writing and final manuscript approval; GGA: study conception, study design, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing and final manuscript approval No funding was received for this work. All data used to perform the study, including the information downloaded from the database as well as that derived from the treatment of the bibliographic entries, are available in the Dataverse Project, an open access public repository [23] (https://dataverse.harvard.edu/, doi: https://doi.org/10. 7910/DVN/02BUNE). Due to the nature of the study and dataset, it was not necessary to obtain informed consent or approval from an institutional ethics committee. The authors give consent to publish the manuscript. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.