key: cord-309956-topo2bc6
authors: Zheng, Kenneth I.; Rios, Rafael S.; Zeng, Qi-Qiang; Zheng, Ming-Hua
title: COVID-19 Cross-Infection and Pressured Ulceration Among Healthcare Workers: Are We Really Protected by Respirators?
date: 2020-09-10
journal: Front Med (Lausanne)
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.571493
sha: 
doc_id: 309956
cord_uid: topo2bc6

nan

OPINION Anticipated vaccination development delay rendered non-pharmaceutical strategies crucial for the control of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Thus, personal protective equipment (PPE) is the key for preventing potential amplification of nosocomial infection and viral transmission as demonstrated during the 2003 SARS outbreak (1) . As of April 8 2020, 22,073 health care workers (HCWs) from 52 countries have reportedly been infected by the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (2). This might imply that there is a certain limitation in the ability of PPE to protect HCWs from cross-infection. Also, it is surmisable that unequal access to PPE and limited instruction in its correct use, may drastically reduce its utility.

For HCWs, the World Health Organization recommended the use of respirators including United States National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-certified N95, European Union standardized FFP2, or equivalently certified respirators, when performing or working in settings that require aerosol-generating procedures (3). The Occupational Safety and Health Administration respiratory protection regulations at 29 CFR 1910.134 mandated that HCWs be fit-tested and seal checked prior to the initial use of a respirator and whenever a different respirator face piece (size, style, model, or make) is used (4). However, not strictly following the aforementioned protocol and design flaws of current PPE are most likely what contributed to the high number of reported cases of SARS-CoV-2 infections among HCWs (5) . In the current pandemic, although trained HCWs are highly adherent to strict protocols, they may not have access to respirators that fit him/her the best. Normally, a respirator should fit over the nose and under the chin with appropriate sealing through an arched metal nosepiece to prevent leakage. However, this is not always achieved due to variance in facial and nose bridge bone structure causing incomplete sealing. To combat this problem, HCWs may resort to manually shortening and fastening the straps that connect the respirator around the neck and over the head causing pressure ulcerations on facial skin along the edges of the respirator (Figure 1 ) (6) . Even then, the safety of HCWs is not guaranteed. In a randomized clinical trial investigating the protection efficacy of N95 respirators (with daily usage of 5-h on average) in 949 HCWs, 37 (3.9%) had a clinical respiratory illness, while 13 (1.4%) had a laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infection (7) . In addition, 52.2% of users felt pressure on the nose, 41.9% felt uncomfortable, and 5% had skin rash. Preliminary analysis estimated the prevalence of skin damage from prolonged use (>6 h per day) of N95 respirator among 542 HCWs managing the COVID-19 pandemic in Hubei, China, to be 58.5% (8) . Additionally, 526 HCWs reported skin damage due to respirator use, while most sites of skin lesions appeared on the nasal bridge (83.1%) and cheek (78.7%) (8) . While it is obvious that the use of respirators can cause discomfort and harm to HCWs, there is a need to evaluate adherence of protocol and to assess the risk of infection from skin lesions due to PPE. Nevertheless, it is recognized that HCWs in the current COVID-19 pandemic, through prolonged wearing of respirators, might be exposed to a higher risk of cross-infection and skin damage.

In order to reduce pressure ulcerations caused by prolonged respirator usage, relieving the pressure from the mask every 2 h was suggested by Gefen (6) ; however, this is not achievable, realistically, as hospitals are often short-staffed and HCWs must work around the clock to manage COVID-19 patients. The metal nose piece used to secure a respirator suggests a certain inadequacy in design. This implies the need for a better designed and improved respirator to strengthen its sealing capability and to reduce skin damage. One alternative solution to decrease facial pressure suggested was applying hydrocolloid padding along the sealing edges of respirators, creating a minute gap between the two (9). This technique may effectively lower the friction and chafing between PPE and the face, thereby drastically reducing skin lesions, although the integrity of the overall sealing is subject to further investigation. Recently, increasing evidence demonstrated the application of silicone foam dressing in reducing pressure ulcers (10, 11) . The application of padding a double-sided silicone foam dressing on the inner surface of the respirator (along the nose arch) might provide a better seal between the face and edges of the respirator (Supplementary Figure 1) . Both hydrocolloid padding and nonallergenic silicone foam dressing may reduce the facial pressure, while the latter is superior for reducing pressure ulcers incidents (any stage) and less prone to skin irritation (12) . However, their applicability to PPE requires further investigation and testing.

In summary, the proper use of respirators among HCWs is pertinent for effectively preventing COVID-19 transmission. Unfitted and improperly fitted respirators are prone to leakage and may lead to an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 cross-infection as well as pressure ulcerations in the skin, especially when used for a long time. It is necessary to improve the design of currently certified respirators in order to achieve better sealing capabilities and reduce pressure ulcerations.

M-HZ and Q-QZ: conception, design, and administrative support. KZ and RR: manuscript writing. All authors: final approval of manuscript.

Epidemiological determinants of spread of causal agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong

Available online at

advice-on-the-use-of-masks-in-the-community-during-homecare-and-in-healthcare-settings-in-the-context-of-the-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov)-outbreak

Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 1910.134-Respiratory Protection

Personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemica narrative review

Devicerelated pressure ulcers: SECURE prevention

A cluster randomized clinical trial comparing fit-tested and nonfit-tested N95 respirators to medical masks to prevent respiratory virus infection in health care workers. Influenza Other Respir Viruses

Skin damage among health care workers managing coronavirus disease-2019

The preventive effect of hydrocolloid dressing to prevent facial pressure and facial marks during use of medical protective equipment in COVID-19 pandemic

Clinical effectiveness of a silicone foam dressing for the prevention of heel pressure ulcers in critically ill patients: border II trial

Foam dressings for treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev

Dressings and topical agents for preventing pressure ulcers

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed. 2020.571493/full#supplementary-material Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.Copyright © 2020 Zheng, Rios, Zeng and Zheng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.