key: cord-320401-itltvh3f
authors: Clementi, Nicola; Scagnolari, Carolina; D’Amore, Antonella; Palombi, Fioretta; Criscuolo, Elena; Frasca, Federica; Pierangeli, Alessandra; Mancini, Nicasio; Antonelli, Guido; Clementi, Massimo; Carpaneto, Armando; Filippini, Antonio
title: NARINGENIN IS A POWERFUL INHIBITOR OF SARS-CoV-2 INFECTION IN VITRO
date: 2020-10-20
journal: Pharmacol Res
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105255
sha: 
doc_id: 320401
cord_uid: itltvh3f

[Figure: see text] Schematic representation of TPC2 role, investigated through genetic ablation and drug blocker, in the inhibition of Coronaviruses release into the cells.

PII: S1043-6618(20) This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Keywords: Naringenin; SARS-CoV-2; Two-Pore Channels (TPCs); COVID-19; Flavonoids; Antiviral therapy

Recently, an interesting review appeared in Pharmacological Research presented a list of candidate drugs against SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 [1] . In the present insight, we highlight novel experimental evidence that the flavanone Naringenin, targeting the endo-lysosomal Two-Pore Channels (TPCs), could be added to the list of potential weapons against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease.

Coronaviruses ( as in the case of hydroxychloroquine, an anti-malarial drug, which has proved to be very controversial [2] . In this scenario, the availability of well tolerated drugs actively impairing virus replication at the early stages of infection represents a promising option and an urgent medical need. Intriguingly, it has been shown that CoV infection depends on trafficking of virions to lysosomal compartments and processing of the S protein by lysosomal proteases is required for productive entry to occur. In this context, the role played by endo-lysosomal TPCs on CoV biology and the feasibility of blocking the intracellular pathway of the virus by inhibiting these channels was preliminarily inferred by our group [3] [4] [5] and confirmed by other authors [6] [7] [8] . Genetic ablation of TPCs or TPC blockers have been previously shown to reduce infectivity affecting trafficking through the endo-lysosomal system of Ebola virus and MERS-CoV [9,10]. Finally, it has recently been demonstrated that a two-pore channel 2 (TPC2) is critically important for SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells and tetrandrine, a TPC inhibit or, previously described to block Ebola virus trafficking in a TPC-dependent manner [9] , was found to impede the entry process of SARS-CoV-2 pseudoviruses [11] .

During the infection process SARS-CoV replication takes place in specific membrane-enclosed cellular compartments, hidden from innate immunity, and membrane fusion events are of pivotal importance for the replication of the virus. Cathepsins B and L, belonging to the papain subfamily of cysteine proteases and located predominantly in endo-lysosomal vesicles, have been described to be fundamental for cleavage of viral S protein allowing the release of the fusogenic peptide S2. Of note, tetrandrine treatment suppressed the replication of common cold related human coronaviruses (HCoV) [12] . These findings support the potential role of TPC-dependent membrane trafficking and J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f translocation of endosomes containing CoVs particles. Moreover, TPCs are known to promote endolysosomal trafficking and evidence is emerging of their contributions to trafficking dysfunction [13, 14] . Therefore, inhibition of TPCs should both impair the fusogenic potential of the endolysosomal system and alter the normal trafficking, limiting viral replication. Noteworthy, our recent evidence has shown that the activity of human TPC channels can be inhibited by the natural flavonoid compound Naringenin (Nar) [4] , one of the main flavonoids present in the human diet. In the present study, we focus on Nar and show data pointing to a novel anti-CoV pharmacological strategy, highly promising for efficient and safe prophylaxis and therapy.

Vero E6 cells were treated adding 62.5 M Nar 1h before infection with HCoVOC43 and HCoV229E

(MOI:0.01). End-point RT/PCR results indicated a strong inhibition of viral replication as shown in Fig.1A .

To further assess the involvement of TPC2 in CoV infection we silenced its expression in the human cell line Huh7.5. Cells were pretreated for siRNA-mediated knockdown of TPC2, which was followed by infection with HCoV229E (MOI:0.01). Inhibition of viral replication was determined at 24, 48 and 72h post-infection (hpi). Partial inhibition of 229E replication was observed at 24hpi in cells silenced for TPC2 by siRNA while stronger inhibition was observed at 48 and 72hpi (Fig.1B ).

shows a significant reduction of TPC2 expression following TPC2 knockdown. These results

show that TPC2 indeed plays a crucial role in HCoV infection; as regards the time lag for the stronger effect, we take it as indicating a slow TPC2 turnover rate.

Vero E6 cells were infected with SARS-CoV-2 (MOI:0.01) and monitored for the presence of cytopathic effect (CPE) at 48 and 72hpi. Upon addition of Nar to the external medium, we observed that SARS-CoV-2 infection was inhibited in a time-and concentration-dependent manner (Fig.1D-E) . Images showed that Nar treatment did not cause toxicity on uninfected cells at any of the tested concentrations and DMSO (vehicle) did not significantly affect SARS-CoV-2 replication (Fig.1D-E) . Of note, results indicated a strong decrease of CPE (>90%) at 48hpi when Vero E6 cells were treated with 250 and 62.5 μM Nar (Fig.1E) . Marked CPE inhibition was still evident at 72hpi,

showing that both 250 and 62.5 μM concentrations of Nar were very effective in protecting cells from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

On the whole, Nar behaves as a lysosomotropic active natural compound exhibiting human pan-CoV antiviral activity. Interestingly, besides its antiviral power, Nar has anti-inflammatory activity by inhibiting TNF- and IL-6 secretion [15] which may synergistically enhance its antiviral effect in vivo. The potential of possible Nar-based medical treatment is that it could tackle both viral infection and the cytokine release/cytokine storm syndrome in COVID-19. As regards clinical trials, the therapeutic potential and safety of Nar have been reviewed [16] and a more recent clinical trial on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of Nar indicates this compound as a very promising candidate for clinical applications [17] . In particular, it has been reported that in healthy humans an oral dose of 600mg Nar results in a serum C max of about 50M, whithout relevant toxicity [18] . Interestingly, this dosage could approach the threshold to ameliorate the cytokine storm as well as inhibit the activity of TPCs. The use of Nar, a hydrophobic molecule able to cross biological membranes and to reach intracellular compartments, as a specific inhibitor of TPCs [4, 5] provides further support for exploiting TPCs inhibition as a novel antiviral therapy. In our view, optimal Nar therapeutic delivery would require nanotechnological approaches and targeting the drug directly to the upper respiratory airways, a non-invasive method of administration, which would warrant direct and selective access at the sites most susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, given the gradient of infectivity reported in the respiratory tree [19] .

In conclusion, data presented in this work point to Nar as a safe anti-SARS-CoV-2 agent endowed with pan-coronavirus inhibitory activity. These findings offer a potential molecular model for CoV infection and a candidate drug target for further, in vivo, experimental trials aimed at improving the management of COVID-19 patients. Differences between treated samples (n=3) and controls (untreated infected cells, n=3, not shown) were significant (P< 0.001).

at 24-48-72hpi in Huh7.5 cells pretreated with siRNA to silence TPC2. Differences between treated samples (n=4, n=3 at 72hpi) and controls (untreated infected cells, n=4, not shown) were significant

Candidate drugs against SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19

Chloroquine does not inhibit infection of human lung cells with SARS-CoV-2

Could the Inhibition of Endo-Lysosomal Two-Pore Channels (TPCs) by the Natural Flavonoid Naringenin Represent an Option to Fight SARS-CoV-2 Infection?

Naringenin Impairs Two-Pore Channel 2 Activity And Inhibits VEGF-Induced Angiogenesis

A perspective on the modulation of plant and animal two pore channels (TPCs) by the flavonoid naringenin

Could an endo-lysosomal ion channel be the Achilles heel of SARS-CoV2?

C) Transient inhibition of TPC2 expression after 24h and 48h in Huh7.5 cells. Differences between treated samples (siTPC2, n=3) and controls (scrambled siRNA, n=3) were significant

Bright-field microscopy images (72hpi) of representative CPE of SARS-CoV-2, hCoV-19/Italy/UniSR1/2020 isolate, detected on both infected and uninfected cells, compared to the untreated infected cells (virus control

E) Inhibition of infection calculated on CPE detected at 48 and 72hpi. Differences between treated samples (n=9) and controls (untreated infected cells, DMSO, n=6) were significant (P<0.001 at 250 and 62

All data were expressed as mean ± sem. Student's t test was used for statistical comparison between