id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
www-inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe-org-7394		A Critical Take on OER Practices: Interrogating Commercialization, Colonialism, and Content – In the Library with the Lead Pipe			.html	text/html	7440	540	52	Both Open Educational Resources (OER) and Open Access (OA) are becoming more central to many librarians' work and the core mission of librarianship, in part because of the perceived relationship between openness and social justice. These include thinking critically about the language we use when engaging stakeholders; moving beyond cost and marketing for our institutions and focusing on open pedagogy and student-centered learning; using OER creation as an opportunity to talk to students about labor and knowledge production; and challenging whose knowledge matters globally. Open Educational Resources (OER) can sometimes be used synonymously with textbooks or traditional learning objects like worksheets and lesson plans. Even if it is free for "developing" nations to read papers (or access OER), it may still be too expensive for some scholars to publish these objects, further limiting the amount of reciprocal sharing happening and making research from other nations less visible (Bonaccorso, et al., 2014; Czerniewicz, 2013).	./cache/www-inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe-org-7394.html	./txt/www-inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe-org-7394.txt