Framing Librarianship in the Academy: An Analysis Using Bolman and Deal’s Model of Organizations | Fleming-May | College & Research Libraries Home Current Issue Past Issues Publish Alerts Fora About MAIN MENU Home Current Issue Past Issues Publish Alerts Fora About About College & Research Libraries (C&RL) is the official, bi-monthly, online-only scholarly research journal of the Association of College & Research Libraries, a division of the American Library Association. About The Authors Rachel A. Fleming-May and Kimberly Douglass are Assistant Professors in the School of Information Sciences at the University of Tennessee; email: rf-m@utk.edu, kdougla2@utk.edu. Article Tools Print this article Indexing metadata How to cite item C&RL News RBM ALA JobLIST About ACRL Advertising Information Most Popular Information Code-Switching: A Study of Language Preferences in Academic Libraries (15227 views) Shame: The Emotional Basis of Library Anxiety (13021 views) The Practice and Promise of Critical Information Literacy: Academic Librarians' Involvement in Critical Library Instruction (10611 views) More >> Home > Vol 75, No 3 (2014) > Fleming-May Framing Librarianship in the Academy: An Analysis Using Bolman and Deal’s Model of Organizations Rachel A. Fleming-May, Kimberly Douglass Abstract Since the earliest days of the profession, academic librarians have attempted to reconcile their status within the academy. This project takes a new approach to this effort by using Lee Bolman and Terrence Deal’s “Four Frames” model to analyze the issues. To more closely examine the dynamics, tensions, and implications associated with librarians’ professional status within the academy, we discuss the role of the academic librarian in the context of each of Bolman and Deal’s frames: Structural, Human Resource, Political, and Symbolic. In this discussion, we demonstrate that librarians are positioned to address human resource (as defined by Bolman and Deal), political, and symbolic factors contributing to their status within the academy. Also, while we establish that the relationship between library faculty and disciplinary faculty plays a role in library faculty status, we conclude that library faculty status is constructed by a number of forces. We further conclude that many of the political and symbolic conditions experienced by librarians are rooted in structural and human resource factors controlled by upper-level administration in both libraries and the universities. Full Text: PDF DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl13-432 Copyright © 2014 Jingfeng Xia and Minglu Wang, Attribution-NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) CC BY-NC Article Views (Last 12 Months) No data available Contact ACRL for article usage statistics from 2010-April 2017. Article Views (By Year/Month) 2020 January: 45 February: 46 March: 49 April: 40 May: 46 June: 53 July: 74 August: 49 September: 74 October: 96 November: 94 2019 January: 24 February: 42 March: 31 April: 35 May: 36 June: 34 July: 31 August: 32 September: 63 October: 71 November: 68 December: 59 2018 January: 7 February: 13 March: 28 April: 38 May: 38 June: 32 July: 38 August: 41 September: 64 October: 91 November: 66 December: 51 2017 April: 0 May: 10 June: 20 July: 21 August: 26 September: 24 October: 37 November: 27 December: 24 © 2019 Association of College and Research Libraries, a division of the American Library Association Print ISSN: 0010-0870 | Online ISSN: 2150-6701 ALA Privacy Policy ISSN: 2150-6701