Background Facts on Contingent Faculty Positions | AAUP Skip to main content Alert Top Message Due to concerns about COVID-19, the AAUP office has transitioned to telework. Please contact staff by email.   Visit the AAUP Foundation Secondary menu Contact Events Career Center Search form Search Submit Join Login About Mission Constitution Biennial Meeting Find a Chapter Elected Leaders Staff Committees Organizational Restructuring History Programs Academic Freedom Shared Governance Chapter Organizing Collective Bargaining Summer Institute Webinars Research Legal Program Government Relations Membership Join/Renew My Account Benefits of Membership Start a Chapter Support Your Union AAUP Shirts and Gear Issues Academic Freedom Shared Governance COVID-19 Pandemic Responding to Financial Crisis Racial Justice Contingent Faculty Positions Tenure Workplace Issues Privatization in Online Education Gender and Sexuality in Higher Education Targeted Harassment Faculty Speech after the 2016 Election Border Searches Intellectual Property & Copyright Civility Sanctuary Campuses Reports/Pubs AAUP Policies & Reports Academe Faculty Compensation Survey Bulletin of the AAUP The Redbook Journal of Academic Freedom Guidebooks News AAUP in the News Read AAUP Updates Join Our Email List Chapter Resources For All Chapters For Union Chapters Chapter Websites Chapter Profiles Start a Chapter Forming a Union Chapter Chapter Responsibilities State Conferences State Conference Directory State Conference Committee A Resources Good Practices for Chapters & Conferences Election Guidance for State Conferences Support for State Conferences   You are here Home Background Facts on Contingent Faculty Positions "Contingent” faculty positions include both part- and full-time non-tenure-track appointments. Their common characteristic is that institutions make little or no long-term commitment to faculty holding these positions.  Today, more than half of all faculty appointments are part-time. This includes positions that may be classified by the institution as adjuncts, part-time lecturers, or graduate assistantships.  Many faculty in so-called “part-time” positions actually teach the equivalent of a full-time course load. Other part-time appointments are held by graduate student employees, whose chances of obtaining tenure-track positions in the future are increasingly uncertain.What is billed as a teaching apprenticeship often instead amounts to years of intensive, low-paid work that distracts from, rather than complementing, graduate studies. To support themselves, part-time faculty often commute between institutions and prepare courses on a grueling timetable, making enormous sacrifices to maintain interaction with their students. Since faculty classified as part-time are typically paid by the course, without benefits, many college teachers lack access to health insurance and retirement plans. Back to top Both part- and full-time non-tenure-track appointments are increasingly prevalent. Non-tenure-track positions of all types now account for over 70 percent of all instructional staff appointments in American higher education. This chart compares tenure-line and contingent appointments 1975–2015.   Back to top The majority of faculty working on contingent appointments do not have professional careers outside of academe, and most teach basic core courses rather than narrow specialties. While a small percentage of part-time faculty are specialists or practitioners of a profession such as law or architecture and teach a class on the side, this situation is the exception rather than the norm. In other words, contingent faculty are "real" faculty, not other professionals who are moonlighting by teaching a course. Students at community colleges and in lower-level undergraduate courses are disproportionately taught by faculty on contingent appointments.  Back to top The excessive use of, and inadequate compensation and professional support for,  faculty in contingent positions exploits these colleagues. Positions that require comparable work, responsibilities, and qualifications should be comparably compensated. As the AAUP recommended in 1993, compensation for part-time appointments should be the applicable fraction of the compensation (including benefits) for a comparable full-time position. Back to top The turn towards cheaper contingent labor is largely a matter of priorities rather than economic necessity. While many institutions are currently suffering budget cuts, the greatest growth in contingent appointments occurred during times of economic prosperity. Many institutions have invested heavily in facilities and technology while cutting instructional spending. Though incoming students may find finer facilities, they are also likely to find fewer full-time faculty with adequate time, professional support, and resources available for their instruction. Back to top Many contingent faculty members are excellent teachers and scholars. But no matter how qualified and dedicated, faculty teaching in these positions are hobbled in the performance of their duties by a lack of professional treatment and support. Many lack access to such basics as offices, computer support, and photocopying services. Back to top Heavy reliance on contingent faculty appointments hurts students. Faculty working conditions are student learning conditions. Faculty on contingent appointments are typically paid only for the hours they spend in the classroom. While they may be excellent teachers, they are not given adequate institutional support for time spent meeting with students, evaluating student work, and class planning and preparation.  Adjuncts are often hired on the spur of the moment with little evaluation or time to prepare--sometimes after a semester has already started. Faculty in contingent positions often receive little or no evaluation and mentoring, making them especially vulnerable to being dismissed over one or two student complaints.  Faculty in contingent positions, though they may teach the majority of some types of courses, are often cut out of department and institution-wide planning. The knowledge that they have about their students and the strengths and weaknesses of the courses they teach is not taken into consideration. The high turnover among contingent faculty members mean that students in a department may never have the same teacher twice, or may be unable to find an instructor who knows them well enough to write a letter of recommendation.  The free exchange of ideas may be hampered by the fear of dismissal for unpopular utterances, so students may be deprived of the debate essential to citizenship. They may also be deprived of rigorous  evaluations of their work. Back to top Overuse of contingent faculty appointments hurts all faculty. The integrity of faculty work is threatened as parts of the whole are divided and assigned piecemeal to instructors, lecturers, graduate students, specialists, researchers, and administrators. Proportionally fewer tenure-track faculty means fewer people to divide up the work of advising students, setting curriculum, and serving on college-wide committees. Divisions among instructors create a less cohesive faculty; on some campuses, tenure-track and adjunct faculty rarely interact or participate in planning together.  Tenure should be a big tent that provides due process protections for the academic freedom of all faculty; where contingent appointments predominate, it becomes instead a merit badge for a select few. Back to top Academic freedom is weakened when a majority of the faculty lack the protections of tenure. The insecure relationship between faculty members in contingent positions and their institutions can chill the climate for academic freedom, which is essential to the common good of a free society. Faculty serving in insecure contingent positions may be less likely to take risks in the classroom or in scholarly and service work.  Back to top The use of non-tenure-track appointments should be limited to specialized fields and emergency situations. While we recognize that current patterns of faculty appointment depart substantially from the ideal, the AAUP recommends that no more than 15 percent of the total instruction within an institution, and no more than 25 percent of the total instruction within any department, should be provided by faculty with non-tenure-track appointments. While institutions often cite "flexibility" for a reason to hire faculty off the tenure track, contingent appointments are often clustered in programs with very high levels of predictability--such as freshman writing courses that are required for all students.  Back to top Shared governance responsibilities should be shared among all faculty, including those appointed to part-time positions. Curricular and other academic decisions benefit from the participation of all faculty, especially those who teach core courses. Faculty and administrators should together determine the appropriate modes and levels of participation in governance for part-time faculty, considering issues such as voting rights, representation, and inclusion in committees and governance bodies. Back to top When contingent appointments are used, they should include job security and due process protections. Contingent faculty appointments, like all faculty appointments, should include: the full range of faculty responsibilities (teaching, scholarship, service); comparable compensation for comparable work; assurance of continuing employment after a reasonable opportunity for successive reviews; inclusion in institutional governance structures; and appointment and review processes that involve faculty peers and follow accepted academic due process. Back to top The proportion of faculty appointments that are on the tenure line should be increased. This can be done by: Changing the status of faculty members currently holding non-tenure-track appointments. Individuals holding contingent appointments are offered tenure-eligible reappointments. Creating new tenure-line appointments. New tenure-line positions are created and open searches are held for candidates to fill them. In both cases, transition to a higher proportion of tenured faculty should be accomplished primarily through attrition, retirements, and, where appropriate “grandfathering” of currently contingent faculty into tenured positions. Faculty in contingent positions should not bear the cost of transition. Back to top Additional information about contingent faculty is available here. Join American Association of University Professors 1133 Nineteenth Street, NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: 202-737-5900 aaup@aaup.org   Visit the AAUP Foundation Secondary menu Contact Events Career Center Privacy Policy & Terms of Use About Mission Constitution Biennial Meeting Awards Sternberg Award Alexander Meiklejohn Award for Academic Freedom Georgina M. Smith Award Outstanding Achievement Award Ralph S. Brown Award for Shared Governance Past Awards Resolutions & Proposals 2018 Resolution 2017 Resolutions 2016 Resolution and Proposal 2015 Resolutions & Proposal 2014 Resolutions 2013 Resolutions 2012 Resolutions 2011 Resolutions 2010 Resolutions 2009 Resolutions 2008 Resolutions 2007 Resolutions 2006 Resolutions How to Submit a Resolution or Proposal Find a Chapter Elected Leaders Officers & Council Records of the Council Council Resolutions Elections Election Guidance for Chapters AAUP At-Large Chapter Election Rules 2020 Election Information 2020 Delegate Forms 2020 Election Speeches FAQs on Changes to Chapter Elections Information about Sections What is a Section? Forming a Section for Delegate Representation 2018 Rerun Election 2018 Election Staff Employment Opportunities Committees AAUP Advisory Committees Association Business Committees Rules Governing Committee Appointments Organizational Restructuring History Timeline AAUP Presidents General Secretaries and Directors Selected Readings AAUP Archives Past Awards Programs Academic Freedom Resources on Academic Freedom Committee A Procedures Censure List Shared Governance Resources on Governance Protect the Faculty Voice Legal Cases Affecting Academic Speech Action Items How-to and Success Stories and Policies Sanctioned Institutions Chapter Organizing Tips for Office Visits AAUP Unionism Collective Bargaining Resources on Collective Bargaining Summer Institute Webinars Past Webinars Research Faculty Compensation Survey Legal Program AAUP Amicus Briefs Amicus Brief Application Process Academic Freedom and Employee Speech Academic Freedom and Institutional Matters Academic Freedom and National Security Academic Freedom and Research Academic Freedom and Teaching Affirmative Action Discrimination and Sexual Harassment Faculty Collective Bargaining Rights Intellectual Property Tenure Faculty Handbooks Guide Legal Informational Outlines Government Relations Membership Join/Renew My Account Benefits of Membership Start a Chapter Support Your Union AAUP Shirts and Gear Issues Academic Freedom Shared Governance COVID-19 Pandemic Guidance for Campus Operation During the Pandemic Responding to Financial Crisis Policies and Best Practices Faculty Handbook Policies, Budget Committees, and Budget Principles Legal Considerations Understanding Institutional Finances Organizing the Faculty Response Accounting Guidelines for Analysis of Financial Exigency Racial Justice Contingent Faculty Positions Resources on Contingent Positions Tenure Resources on Tenure Workplace Issues Beginning a Faculty Appointment Evaluations and Reviews Leaving the Institution—or Staying Contours of Academic Freedom Privatization in Online Education Gender and Sexuality in Higher Education Targeted Harassment Faculty Speech after the 2016 Election Border Searches Intellectual Property & Copyright AAUP IP Policy Resources on Copyright, Distance Education, and Intellectual Property CAUT IP Policies IP Legislation IP Fact Sheets IP Amicus Brief IP Essays Civility Sanctuary Campuses Reports/Pubs AAUP Policies & Reports Academic Freedom and Tenure Investigations Governance Investigations Standing Committee and Subcommittee Reports Academic Freedom, Tenure, and Due Process College and University Government Professional Ethics Research and Teaching Distance Education and Intellectual Property Work and Family Discrimination Retirement and Leaves of Absence Collective Bargaining Economic Status of the Profession College and University Accreditation Student Rights and Freedoms Audit Reports View All Reports Academe Current Academe Issue Previous Issues Submissions Subscriptions Advertising in Academe Contact Faculty Compensation Survey Bulletin of the AAUP Volume 106 (2020) Volume 105 (2019) Volume 104 (2018) Volume 103 (2017) Volume 102 (2016) Volume 101 (2015) Volume 100 (2014) Volume 99 (2013) Volume 98 (2012) Volume 97 (2011) Volume 96 (2010) The Redbook Journal of Academic Freedom About/Contact Call for Papers Volume 1 (2010) Editor's Introduction Professionalization as the Basis for Academic Freedom and Faculty Governance The AAUP, Academic Freedom, and the Cold War The Eroding Foundations of Academic Freedom and Professional Integrity Ward Churchill at the Dalton Trumbo Fountain The Last Indian Standing The Demise of Shared Governance at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Paranoia and Professionalization Towards an Autonomous Antioch College Hidden (and Not-So-Hidden) New Threats to Faculty Governance Academic Freedom and the Digital Revolution Rethinking Academic Traditions for Twenty-First-Century Faculty Institutionalized Attacks on Academic Freedom The Corporatization of American Higher Education “I Have No Idea What You Do Out Here” Volume 2 (2011) Editor's Introduction Teaching in the Corporate University Outcomes Assessment The Disemboweled University John Ervin Kirkpatrick and the Rulers of American Colleges A Tale of Two Conferences Invigorating the Classroom Fundamental Freedom or Fringe Benefit? Butler University v. John Doe Biology, Theology, and Academic Freedom The View from 2020 Campus Clout, Statewide Strength What Do Graduate Employee Unions Have to Do with Academic Freedom? Graduate Student Academic Freedom and the Apprenticeship Myth Volume 3 (2012) Editor's Introduction Assessment as a Subversive Activity In Response to Ellen Schrecker’s “Ward Churchill at the Dalton Trumbo Fountain” Report on the Termination of Ward Churchill The Dismissal of Ralph Turner The US Air Force Academy Negotiating Academic Freedom Cooking the Goose That Lays the Golden Eggs Academic Freedom in a State-Sponsored African University Academic Freedom in Principle and Practice Volume 4 (2013) Editor's Introduction Rethinking Academic Boycotts Palestine, Boycott, and Academic Freedom Boycott, Academic Freedom, and the Moral Responsibility to Uphold Human Rights The Israeli State of Exception and the Case for Academic Boycott Boycotts against Israel and the Question of Academic Freedom in American Universities in the Arab World Changing My Mind about the Boycott Academic Freedom Encompasses the Right to Boycott Market Forces and the College Classroom: Losing Sovereignty Academic Freedom from Below Readers Respond: Cary Nelson Readers Respond: Ernst Benjamin Readers Respond: Emily Budick Readers Respond: Joshua A. Fogel Readers Respond: Kenneth Waltzer Readers Respond: Gerald M. Steinberg Readers Respond: Kenneth L. Marcus and Sitara Kedilaya Readers Respond: Samuel M. Edelman Readers Respond: Peter Haas Readers Respond: USACBI Organizing Collective Readers Respond: Chad Alan Goldberg Readers Respond: Roderick A. Ferguson and Jodi Melamed Authors Respond: David Lloyd Authors Respond: Bill V. Mullen Authors Respond: Malini Johar Schueller Readers Respond: Rima Kapitan Volume 5 (2014) Editor's Introduction ‘To Make Collective Action Possible’ Religion, Sectarianism, and the Pursuit of Truth Tenure Matters: An Historian's Perspective The Two Cultures of Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century The Case of the Student Racist Facebook Message Emergencies and Due Process Opportunities of Our Own Making Open Access to Technology On the Pros and Cons of Being a Faculty Member at E-Text University On the Ground in Kansas Volume 6 (2015) Editor's Introduction Professionalism and Unionism Catholicism and Unions A New Hope? The “Textbook Controversy” Title IX, Sexual Harassment, and Academic Freedom Institutional Review Boards Risking Responsibility The Personal Ethics of Academic Freedom Academic Freedom and Extramural Utterances Civility and Academic Freedom after Salaita Professor Salaita's Intramural Speech Garcetti and Salaita Everything Old Is New Again Social Media & the Politics of Collegiality Steven Salaita’s Scholarly Record and the Problem of His Appointment Response to Cary Nelson Volume 7 (2016) Editor's Introduction Academic Freedom, Political Interference, and Public Accountability Debating Academic Freedom in India A Review of Academic Freedom in African Universities Lost in Post-Cold War Transitions Academic Freedom and the Common Good The AAUP's 1915 Declaration of Principles Championing Academic Freedom at Rutgers Free Space in the Academy Volume 8 (2017) Editor's Introduction - Volume 8 Oppenheimer’s House Repressive Tolerance Revamped? Collective Bargaining, Shared Governance, and Academic Freedom An Evolution of Principled Futility Complying with Title IX while Protecting Shared Governance, Academic Freedom, and Due Process Intellectual Freedom, Academic Freedom, and the Academic Librarian Academic Freedom as the Freedom to do Academic Work On Free Speech and Academic Freedom Volume 9 (2018) Editor's Introduction “Affirming Our Values” The Academic Freedom Double Standard When Free Speech Disrupts Diversity Initiatives At the Margins of University Work Diversity Work The Ironic Interplay of Free Speech and Silencing Free Speech, Safe Spaces, and Teaching Stopping the Presses Academic Freedom under the Gun Not Chilly Enough? Managing the Academic Racehorse Illuminating the Dark History Volume 10 (2019) Editor's Introduction Compulsory Civility and the Necessity of (Un)Civil Disobedience A Vision for Scholar-Activists of Color The Danger of Campus Bans on Bullying The Weaponization of Student Evaluations of Teaching Endangered and Vulnerable The Tale of Professor X Postwar Recovery and Student Academic Freedom in Côte d’Ivoire "Book Burning" in Japan Dear Administrators No Sanctuary Speech, Academic Freedom, and Privilege Volume 11 (2020) Editor's Introduction Trickle-Down Managerialism On Borders and Academic Freedom Gentrifying the University and Disempowering the Professoriate What I Learned in the Faculty Senate The Rollins College Inquiry of 1933 Leadership during a Budget Crisis Leadership Threats to Shared Governance How Ego, Greed, and Hubris (Almost) Destroyed a University Why Revenue Generation Can’t Solve the Crisis in Higher Education Afterword: Can the Managerial Technique Speak? Guidebooks News AAUP in the News 2019 AAUP in the News 2018 AAUP in the News Read AAUP Updates 2019 AAUP Updates 2018 AAUP Updates 2017 AAUP Updates 2016 AAUP Updates 2015 AAUP Updates 2014 AAUP Updates 2013 AAUP Updates 2012 AAUP Updates 2011 AAUP Updates 2010 AAUP Updates Join Our Email List Chapter Resources For All Chapters AAUP Terms and Abbreviations Building Campus Coalitions Chapter Leader Digests For Union Chapters How-Tos Tips for Successful Office Visits List Building Media Relations Government Relations Toolkit Institutional Financial Analysis Chapter Websites Chapter Profiles Start a Chapter Starting an AAUP Chapter, Step By Step Sample Chapter Bylaws Establishing Advocacy-Chapter Dues Forming a Union Chapter Organizing in Challenging Contexts Chapter Responsibilities Guidelines for Good Practices Resolving Complaints against Chapters Good Practices for Chapters & Conferences State Conferences State Conference Directory State Conference Committee A Resources Good Practices for Chapters & Conferences Election Guidance for State Conferences Support for State Conferences