doi:10.1086/302687 1785 Letters to the Editor Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65:1785, 1999 Elevated Frequency and Allelic Heterogeneity of Congenital Nephrotic Syndrome, Finnish Type, in the Old Order Mennonites To the Editor: Congenital nephrotic syndrome is a clinically and ge- netically heterogeneous disorder of the glomerular fil- tration barrier, characterized by massive proteinuria at or shortly after birth. Although nephrotic syndromes encompass a heterogeneous group of disorders, congen- ital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type (NPHS1 [MIM 256300]) is a distinct clinical entity. NPHS1 has an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance and is gen- erally rare—except in Finland, where the incidence is ∼1/10,000 live births (Norio 1966). Nephrin, a putative transmembrane protein belonging to the immunoglob- ulin family of cell-adhesion molecules, has been identi- fied as the gene mutated in NPHS1, with loss-of-function deletion and missense mutations identified in Finnish and other white patients with NPHS1 (Kestilä et al. 1998; Lenkkeri et al. 1999). Several cases of NPHS1 have also been observed in other populations, with or without direct evidence of Finnish ancestry (Fuchshuber et al. 1996). On the basis of limited haplotype analysis, it has been argued that some cases of non-Finnish NPHS1 may have a common origin in Finland (Män- nikkö et al. 1996). We observed a high incidence of NPHS1 among the Old Order Mennonites in Lancaster County, Pennsyl- vania. In particular, we identified 26 cases of NPHS1, dating from the 1950s, in a very large inbred Mennonite kindred (population). Interestingly, all but one of the cases of NPHS1 in Mennonites occurred in a subgroup known as the “Groffdale Conference” Mennonites. The Groffdale Conference Mennonites formed as a result of a schism in the Weaverland Conference Mennonites of Lancaster County in 1927. The separation between the two groups was based on differing views regarding ac- culturation to American thought and society. The more conservative group formed the Groffdale Conference, whereas the more progressive members continued in the Weaverland Conference. At present, the populations and birth rates of the two conferences are approximately equal. We estimated the incidence of NPHS1 among the Groffdale Conference to be .002 or 1/500 live births, on the basis of the complete ascertainment of eight cases among 4,062 births during the period 1985–94. This incidence is 20 times greater than that observed in Fin- land and predicts that ∼8% of Groffdale Mennonites are carriers of the NPHS1-causing allele. The ancestors of this Old Order group immigrated from Switzerland to Lancaster County during the early 18th century, and no explicit Finnish ancestry is known. In this study, we (1) confirm the role of nephrin in NPHS1, (2) show that a major mutation is shared by families with NPHS1 that are in the Groffdale Conference, and (3) show that this mutation is most likely of recent origin—uncovered by inbreeding and amplified by genetic drift. Our data also suggest that the major Mennonite mutation most like- ly predated the Weaverland-Groffdale split, since one Weaverland NPHS1 proband is a double heterozygote with one copy of the major nephrin mutation as well as a second novel mutation, possibly contributed through a non-Mennonite lineage. We initially ascertained four families, in each case through a proband with NPHS1. The four families had 8 obligate carrier parents and 11 unaffected offspring. Only one of the probands from these four families was alive during the study. Subsequent to our analysis of these four families, one additional family—which in- cluded a second surviving proband, parents, and pa- ternal grandparents—was ascertained. After our muta- tion-detection studies were completed, three additional families with NPHS1 agreed to participate. One of the two living Mennonite probands with NPHS1 (6986) was less-severely affected than the other patients. This patient underwent nephrectomy at age 18 mo, followed by nightly peritoneal dialysis and a renal transplant at age 3.5 years. Prior to nephrectomy, this child had an array of life-threatening problems, includ- ing recurrent renal-vein thrombosis, severe hypertension, encephalitis, hypothyroidism, refractory anemia, hyper- cholesterolemia, edema, ascites, and malnutrition. The second surviving Mennonite child was 30 mo of age at the time of our study. She had minimal medical inter- ventions until age 2 years, at which time she was started on the Finnish protocol of enalapril, thyroid replace- 1786 Letters to the Editor Table 1 Oligonucleotide Primers for Amplification of NPHS1 Exons Exon(s) Primer Sequences Annealing Temperature (oC) Product Size (bp) 1, 2 Forward: AGACGCAAGGTGGCTGGCAGCG 60 474 Reverse: TTCCGCTGGTGGCTGAGGGTC 3, 4 Forward: AGCGGAGCTGCGGCCCTGACT 63 520 Reverse: CCTTCCCACTCCAGAGGCTTCA 5 Forward: TCGCACCCACCCTGAGGACTTC 60 252 Reverse: ATGCTTGCATCCCTGGGGTCTG 6 Forward: CCCCACCTCTTCTCCCTGACT 60 246 Reverse: ATCCCCCCACACCCCCCAGTG 7, 8 Forward: GGAAAGAGTGGATGGGCTACT 60 486 Reverse: CTCTGAGGCACAGACCGACAG 9 Forward: TCTGGGCTGGTCTGTGAGAAA 55 264 Reverse: TCAGCCCCCTCCATGCTCAGA 10, 11 Forward: GTGCTGCAGTCCCCACGTCTG Reverse: CATTCCTGGCCACCCCCATAG 60 435 12 Forward: TGCTGATGAGAGTGCTTCTCC 60 467 Reverse: CACCCCAGGCTCCGCCCAGTC 13 Forward: CTGGGCGGAGCCTGGGGTGCA 60 308 Reverse: CAGAGGCTGGAGAGGCACTAG 14 Forward: ATCCCTCCCCTCTCTGGTCTG 60 356 Reverse: AAGGTAAGACCCAAGGAGTAG 15, 16 Forward: AACCTTAAACCCCGTCGTGAC 60 543 Reverse: CAATGAGGAGACTCCACAATG 17 Forward: AACCTTCCTGGAACCCCTAAG 57 300 Reverse: CACTCCCAAGGAACTCACAGT 18, 19 Forward: GTGATGGATCTGGGGCTAGAC 59 558 Reverse: AGGGACTCAGGGAGGGGAAGT 20 Forward: GATAGATAGGCAGACGGTTAC 55 382 Reverse: AACTCCATCCTCACACATACA 21, 22 Forward: TCTTCTGGAATTCTTTTGTAT 55a 474 Reverse: TACACATCCTCTGAGGAATAC 23 Forward: ACCAGTTCCCATGAATCTAATA 55 262 Reverse: GTCGTTAAGCAGCTGTGACTAC 24–26 Forward: CAGCCTGTTGTCTGGGATTC 60 610 Reverse: GCTTCAGTCGCCGTCGGTGC 27, 28 Forward: TCCGGGCACAGTGGGGTCAGAG 59 454 Reverse: GCAGCTAGCTGGCCCTAACTAA 29 Forward: TCCATGGTTCTAACTCACTT 60 580 Reverse: GCACTTAGGGACCCTCAGAATAG a Requires 10% DMSO. ment, vitamin D, and erythropoetin (Guez et al. 1998). Within 4 wk of the start of enalapril therapy, her serum albumin increased from 0.6 to 2.1 g/dl and her gener- alized edema resolved. If she survives until she obtains a weight of 10–12 kg, renal transplantation will be reconsidered. For genetic analysis, we obtained, with informed con- sent, either peripheral blood samples or buccal swabs from members of the eight families. Genomic DNA was extracted according to standard procedures. No pa- thology samples were available from the deceased af- fected individuals, to perform additional analyses. Mi- crosatellite-marker alleles were amplified and genotyped via standard PCR methods (Puffenberger et al. 1994). Allele sizes for all markers (except D19S608, D19S609, and D19S610) were determined in comparison with CEPH individual 1347-02; allele numbers for D19S608, D19S609, and D19S610 were assigned arbitrarily. To determine the genomic structure of nephrin, we used the “BLAST 2-sequences” option of the program BLAST (Tatusova et al. 1999), to align nephrin cDNA sequence and overlapping genomic sequence from cosmid R33502 (GenBank AFO35835 and AC002133). The gene con- sists of 29 exons and spans ∼26 kb; primer sequences, from the program Oligo, version 4.0, were designed for PCR amplification of all 29 exons in 19 reactions (table 1). For mutation analysis, nephrin exons were PCR am- plified from one patient (3898), the patient’s father (3833), and a CEPH control DNA. After PCR amplifi- cation, products were sequenced on an ABI377 se- Letters to the Editor 1787 Figure 1 Haplotype analysis of four Mennonite nuclear families with NPHS1. Chromosome 19q13 haplotypes, of the markers shown in table 2, of NPHS1-transmitting parents and homozygosity for a haplotype in proband 3898 are shown. None of the 11 unaffected siblings from the four families were homozygous for the identified haplotype (data not shown). The common mutation, 1481delC, segregates with the haplotype designated in boldface. quencer (PE Biosystems), with the use of standard dye- terminator chemistry. We expected that any NPHS1 candidate locus will have a unique haplotype in Mennonites, which is ho- mozygous in affected individuals, heterozygous in the 8 obligate heterozygote parents, and not homozygous in the 11 unaffected siblings (fig. 1 shows all individuals but the unaffected siblings). Using 10 microsatellite markers, Männikkö et al. (1995) mapped NPHS1 to chromosome 19q13.1 by linkage and linkage-disequi- librium analysis in Finnish patients. We genotyped these same markers in the 20 available individuals and iden- tified a common haplotype (table 2) for five markers in the 3.5-cM interval D19S609–D19S220, satisfying the above criteria and implicating nephrin in Mennonite NPHS1. It is unclear whether any of the Finnish NPHS1 haplotypes are in common with Mennonite NPHS1 hap- lotypes, since Kestilä et al. (1998) have not published actual allele sizes at the marker loci studied. Nucleotide sequencing of all nephrin exons (table 1) from one proband revealed the deletion of one nucleo- tide within exon 12 (1481delC), which segregated with the NPHS1 haplotypes identified. In addition to the fam- ilies shown in figure 1, six parents from three additional Mennonite sibships with NPHS1 were genotyped for the 1481delC mutation; all were heterozygous. This deletion mutation is novel (Kestilä et al. 1998) and leads to a frameshift and premature truncation of the protein, to 547 residues. Nephrin is a 1,241-residue protein pre- dicted to be a cell-adhesion receptor and/or a signaling protein. Its predicted structure includes eight Ig-like do- mains and one fibronectin-like domain, adjacent to a transmembrane region. The truncation caused by the Mennonite mutation occurs well before the putative transmembrane domain (residues 1059–1068); there- fore, it follows that 1481delC is very likely a null allele and that homozygotes have no functional protein. Subsequent to the identification of 1481delC, we as- certained the only other living Mennonite proband (6986 [fig. 2]) and his immediate family. Interestingly, this patient was found to be heterozygous for 1481delC and inherited the allele maternally. After nephrin se- quence analysis of this patient and his father, we detected a second frameshift mutation, 3250delG, for which both were heterozygous. Genealogical analysis revealed that proband 6986 has a partially non-Mennonite lineage; his maternal great-grandmother married into the Men- nonite kindred (fig. 2). We were able to trace the second mutation, 3250delG, to the patient’s paternal grandfa- ther by DNA analysis. Since the proband’s non-Men- 1788 Letters to the Editor Table 2 Mennonite NPHS1 Mutant-Allele–Carrying Haplotypes Markera Intermarker Distance (cM)b Haplotypec D19S414 4.9 181 163 163 181 D19S416 .6 177 165 165 177 D19S425 1.0 252 260 260 252 D19S609 1 1 1 1 D19S610 3.0 1 1 1 1 D19S608 4 4 4 4 D19S224 .5 258 258 258 258 D19S220 2.2 283 283 283 283 D19S223 5.6 238 238 238 242 D19S574 184 184 190 198 a Markers in the segment common to all haplotypes and that implicate nephrin in NPHS1 span a genetic distance of �3.5 cM and are underlined. b Between the marker shown and that immediately below (except for “3.0,” which denotes the distance spanned by the four markers underlined). c The boxed portion indicates a common haplotype segment shared by all parents of the affected individuals whom we studied. The number of copies is four, two, one, and one, respectively. Figure 2 Genealogy of two nephrin-deletion mutations. The sin- gle Mennonite proband who is doubly heterozygous and who inherited the common Mennonite mutation and a second mutation from a non- Mennonite ancestor is shown. The kinship coefficient of the ancestors shown clarifies that this proband is closely related to other Mennonites with NPHS1. nonite great-grandmother is deceased, we could not establish whether she contributed this mutation or whether the occurrence of 3250delG is a new mutation in the proband’s grandfather. Nonetheless, we identified a second unique mutation, which also results in pre- mature truncation of nephrin protein, resulting in a 1,141-residue protein. According to the predicted struc- ture of the protein, it is likely that the 1,141-residue protein inserts into the membrane but lacks the complete cytosolic domain. Thus, some residual nephrin function may exist and may explain the less-severe phenotype of this patient. Our results confirm the role of nephrin in NPHS1 and allelic heterogeneity within the Mennonites. NPHS1 is very rare throughout the world, and its low incidence is likely under mutation-selection balance; for a recessive lethal mutation, the incidence would equal its de novo mutation rate per generation, which has a mean value of ∼10�6 (Cavalli-Sforza and Bodmer 1971). The ∼1/ 10,000 incidence in Finland is two orders of magnitude larger and is likely to have increased by genetic drift and founder effects during the past 100 generations (2,000 years) of Finnish history. Moreover, the occurrence of at least three distinct mutations, each on a specific marker haplotype with estimated frequencies of 0.78%, 0.16%, and 0.06% (Kestilä et al. 1998), suggests that the age of the more frequent mutation is not recent. This is cor- roborated by the observation of linkage disequilibrium, over a small distance (∼150 kb), for the major Finnish NPHS1 mutation (Kestilä et al. 1998). As we have shown here, these effects are further amplified in the Old Order Mennonites, which have a much more recent his- tory and a much smaller effective population size. In this study, we have estimated the Mennonite NPHS1 incidence at ∼1/500 live births, or an overall 20- fold increase compared with the Finnish incidence. This large increase is undoubtedly from genetic drift and founder effects (Chakravarti and Chakraborty 1978), consistent with the finding of a major common mutation (1481delC) in a population with an estimated effective number of ∼200 (A. Chakravarti and E. G. Puffenberger, unpublished data). We argue that the 1481delC muta- tion is likely of very recent origin. Table 1 shows that the core NPHS1 haplotype, on which the 1481delC mu- tation is found, is shared by all eight mutant chromo- somes and is �3.5 cM; however, haplotypes 1 and 4 (five copies total) and haplotypes 2 and 3 (three copies total) each share the longer D19S414–D19S220 hap- lotype, of 10 cM. Therefore, the average time to origin of the common mutation in the Mennonites is ∼1/0.1 morgans, or ∼10 generations. It is possible either that this was a rare mutation in the European Mennonite groups and that it expanded in the United States or that the mutation is of recent U.S. origin. As mentioned above, the distribution of NPHS1 is not random within the Old Order Mennonite community and is largely restricted to the Groffdale Conference. The Groffdale and Weaverland Conferences share very recent ancestry, yet the distribution and allelic spectrum of NPHS1 mutations are not equal within these two groups. At present, only 1 case of NPHS1 has been ob- Letters to the Editor 1789 served in the Weaverland Mennonites, whereas 25 cases have been identified in the Groffdale Mennonites since the 1950s. We have found that the single Weaver- land Conference patient with NPHS1 (6986) is a com- pound heterozygote for the major Mennonite mutation, 1481delC (same core haplotype as in table 2), and a second mutation, 3250delG. Our analysis shows that 1481delC is the only mutation segregating in seven nu- clear families from the Groffdale Conference (fig. 2). It is interesting that the origin of 3250delG is non-Men- nonite, since it is inherited through the non-Mennonite ancestors of proband 6986. These data emphasize the rarity of NPHS1 mutations in most populations, iden- tified here among non-Mennonites only when combined with a common Mennonite mutation. Moreover, the concentration of 1481delC in the Groffdale Mennonites suggests that NPHS1 occurs at an incidence much higher than 1/500. The incidence within each conference cannot as yet be determined with any greater precision. The accumulation of NPHS1 in the Groffdale Con- ference and the rarity of 1481delC in the Weaverland Conference can be explained in multiple ways. First, a subfounder effect might explain the high incidence within the Groffdale group. However, genealogical and mutational analyses do not support this hypothesis, since there is no common ancestor for all carriers of NPHS1 who were born after the 1927 schism and 1481delC is present in the Weaverland Mennonite population. Sec- ond, 1481delC may have arisen in the Groffdale Men- nonites and may have been reintroduced into the Weav- erland Conference. Since marriage between the groups is extremely rare, it is unlikely, although not impossible, that the mutation was contributed to the Weaverland Conference after the 1927 split. An alternative and sim- pler explanation is that 1481delC arose prior to the split and that it has increased in frequency through genetic drift. The formation of the Groffdale Conference by fam- ily groups wishing to preserve a simpler lifestyle may have led, by chance, to a relative increase in the mutant- allele frequency in one conference compared with the other. It is surprising that a recent mutation has achieved such a high frequency in a short time. This is likely a result of the intense inbreeding that occurs within the Old Order Mennonites in each generation—not from high rates of social consanguinity but from the limited ancestral pool and the sharing of multiple common an- cestors between any two individuals. We have estab- lished a genealogical database of 17,500 individuals from the Old Order Mennonites that allows direct cal- culation of kinship coefficients between any two indi- viduals, equivalently the inbreeding coefficient for their offspring. We studied 12 pairs of parents with com- plete genealogies and with an offspring affected with NPHS1; the average kinship coefficient was .020 (range .010–.037), corresponding to a relationship between first cousins once removed and second cousins. For the four pairs of parents that we report here, the average kinship coefficient was .017 (range .014–.019). These rates are relevant for most individuals in the last several generations. Consequently, any de novo mutation oc- curring in the recent past has a high chance of becoming homozygous, through inbreeding, in the Mennonites. This is in contrast to outbred populations, in which, with random mating, rare mutants become homozygous only rarely. Acknowledgments We are very indebted to the members of the numerous fam- ilies with nephrotic syndrome, for sharing information and donating tissue samples; without these families this work would have been impossible. We gratefully acknowledge the superb assistance of Jennifer Scott, for family studies; Kimberly Bentley, Andrew Wong, and Gilbert Wong, for DNA sequenc- ing and technical assistance; and Carl Kashuk, for informatics. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant HD28088 to A.C. STACEY BOLK,1 ERIK G. PUFFENBERGER,2 JIM HUDSON,3 D. HOLMES MORTON,2 AND ARAVINDA CHAKRAVARTI1 1Department of Genetics and Center for Human Genetics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland; 2Clinic for Special Children, Strasburg, PA; and 3Research Genetics, Huntsville Electronic-Database Information Accession numbers and URLs for data in this article are as follows: BLAST, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST (for alignment of sequences) GenBank, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Web/Search (for ne- phrin cDNA [accession number AF035835] and for cosmid R33502 [accession number AC002133]) Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), http://www .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim (for NPHS1 [MIM 256300]) References Cavalli-Sforza LL, Bodmer WF (1971) The genetics of human populations. WH Freeman, San Francisco Chakravarti A, Chakraborty R (1978) Elevated frequency of Tay-Sachs disease among Ashkenazic Jews unlikely by ge- netic drift alone. Am J Hum Genet 30:256–261 Fuchshuber A, Niaudet P, Gribouval O, Jean G, Gubler M, Broyer M, Antignac C (1996) Congenital nephrotic syn- drome of the Finnish type: linkage to the locus in a non- Finnish population. Pediatr Nephrol 10:135–138 Guez S, Giani M, Melzi ML, Antignac C, Assael BM (1998) 1790 Letters to the Editor Adequate clinical control of congenital nephrotic syndrome by enalapril. Pediatr Nephrol 12:130–132 Kestilä M, Lenkkeri U, Männikkö M, Lamerdin J, McCready P, Putaala H, Ruotsalainen V, et al (1998) Positionally cloned gene for a novel glomerular protein—nephrin—is mutated in congenital nephrotic syndrome. Mol Cell 1:575–582 Lenkkeri U, Männikkö M, McCready P, Lamerdin J, Gribou- val O, Niaudet PM, Antignac C, et al (1999) Structure of the gene for congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type (NPHS1) and characterization of mutations. Am J Hum Genet 64:51–61 Männikkö M, Kestilä M, Holmberg C, Norio R, Ryynänen M, Olsen A, Peltonen L, et al (1995) Fine mapping and haplotype analysis of the locus for congenital nephrotic syn- drome on chromosome 19q13.1. Am J Hum Genet 57: 1377–1383 Männikkö M, Lenkkeri U, Kashtan CE, Kestilä M, Holmberg C, Tryggvason K (1996) Haplotype analysis of congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type in non-Finnish fam- ilies. J Am Soc Nephrol 7:2700–2703 Norio R (1966) Heredity of the congenital nephrotic syn- drome. Ann Paediatr Fenn 12 Suppl 27:1–94 Puffenberger EG, Kauffman ER, Bolk S, Matise TC, Wash- ington SS, Angrist M, Weissenbach J, et al (1994) Identity- by-descent and association mapping of a recessive gene for Hirschsprung disease on human chromosome 13q22. Hum Mol Genet 3:1217–1225 Tatusova TA, Madden TL (1999) Blast 2 sequences: a new tool for comparing protein and nucleotide sequences. FEMS Microbiol Lett 174:247–250 Address for correspondence and reprints: Dr. Aravinda Chakravarti, Depart- ment of Genetics, BRB 721, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue (for courier service: 2109 Adelbert Road), Cleveland, OH 44106. E- mail: axc39@po.cwru.edu � 1999 by The American Society of Human Genetics. All rights reserved. 0002-9297/1999/6506-0038$02.00