Michael Hart in Roanoke (Indiana) – Infomotions Mini-Musings Skip to content Infomotions Mini-Musings Artist- and Librarian-At-Large Menu and widgets Recent posts Charting & graphing with Tableau Public Extracting parts-of-speech and named entities with Stanford tools Creating a plain text version of a corpus with Tika Identifying themes and clustering documents using MALLET Introduction to the NLTK Categories Alex Catalogue (14) Hacks (52) Librarianship (37) Miscellaneous (20) Reviews (16) Travelogues (22) Uncategorized (39) Tags "next generation" library catalogs ALA Alex Catalogue archiving bigrams book-binding c4l11 Code4Lib concordance dh2010 digital humanities Digital Library Federation (DLF) DPLA (Digital Public Library of America) Encoded Archival Description (EAD) ePub Google Books Google Onebox great books HyperCard hypertext indexing Internet Archive LDAP Lucene MARC metadata n-grams NGC4Lib OAI-PMH Open Library open source software Perl preservation services against texts Steve Cisler term frequency/inverse document frequency (TFIDF) text mining Top Technology Trends University of Michigan VUFind water WebService::Solr widgets word cloud XSLT Search for: Archives Archives Select Month May 2018  (1) April 2018  (8) March 2018  (1) August 2017  (1) June 2016  (1) May 2016  (2) April 2016  (2) March 2016  (2) January 2016  (2) November 2015  (2) October 2015  (3) September 2015  (1) June 2015  (1) April 2015  (1) January 2015  (1) October 2014  (1) August 2014  (1) July 2014  (1) June 2014  (1) February 2014  (1) December 2013  (1) November 2013  (2) December 2011  (1) September 2011  (1) August 2011  (1) July 2011  (2) June 2011  (2) May 2011  (2) April 2011  (1) March 2011  (4) February 2011  (1) January 2011  (1) December 2010  (5) November 2010  (2) October 2010  (2) September 2010  (3) August 2010  (6) July 2010  (2) June 2010  (8) May 2010  (3) April 2010  (1) March 2010  (4) January 2010  (2) December 2009  (3) October 2009  (2) September 2009  (3) August 2009  (6) July 2009  (4) June 2009  (5) May 2009  (2) April 2009  (7) March 2009  (2) February 2009  (4) January 2009  (4) December 2008  (6) November 2008  (2) September 2008  (3) August 2008  (4) July 2008  (9) June 2008  (6) May 2008  (4) About this blog Blogroll CRRA Blog Days in the Life of a Librarian Digital Humanities @ Notre Dame Linked Data and Archives Musings on Librarianship Readings Michael Hart in Roanoke (Indiana) On Saturday, February 27, Paul Turner and I made our way to Roanoke (Indiana) to listen to Michael Hart tell stories about electronic texts and Project Gutenberg. This posting describes our experience. Roanoke and the library To celebrate its 100th birthday, the Roanoke Public Library invited Michael Hart of Project Gutenberg fame to share his experience regarding electronic texts in a presentation called “Books & eBooks: Past, Present & Future Libraries”. The presentation was scheduled to start around 3 o’clock, but Paul Turner and I got there more than an hour early. We wanted to have time to visit the Library before it closed at 2 o’clock. The town of Roanoke (Indiana) — a bit south west of Fort Wayne — was tiny by just about anybody’s standard. It sported a single blinking red light, a grade school, a few churches, one block of shops, and a couple of eating establishments. According to the man in the bar, the town got started because of the locks that had been built around town. The Library was pretty small too, but it bursted with pride. About 1,800 square feet in size, it was overflowing with books and videos. There were a couple of comfy chairs for adults, a small table, a set of four computers to do Internet things, and at least a few clocks the wall. They were very proud of the fact that they had become an Evergreen library as a part Evergreen Indiana initiative. “Now is is possible to see what is owned in other, nearby libraries, and borrow things from them as well,” said the Library’s Board Director. Michael Hart The presentation itself was not held in the Library but in a nearby church. About fifty (50) people attended. We sat in the pews and contemplated the symbolism of the stained glass windows and wondered how the various hardware placed around the alter was going to be incorporated into the presentation. Full of smiles and joviality, Michael Hart appeared in a tailless tuxedo, cumber bun, and top hat. “I am now going to pull a library out of my hat,” he proclaimed, and proceeded to withdraw a memory chip. “This chip contains 10’s of thousands of books, and now I’m going to pull a million books out of my pocket,” and he proceed to display a USB drive. Before the year 2020 he sees us capable of carrying around a billion books on some sort of portable device. Such was the essence of his presentation — computer technology enables the distribution and acquisition of “books” in ways never before possible. Through this technology he wants to change the world. “I consider myself to be like Johnny Appleseed, and I’m spreading the word,” at which time I raised my hand and told him Johnny Appleseed (John Chapman) was buried just up the road in Fort Wayne. Mr. Hart displayed and described a lot of antique hardware. A hard drive that must have weighed fifty (50) pounds. Calculators. Portable computers. Etc. He illustrated how storage mediums were getting smaller and smaller while being able to save more and more data. He was interested in the packaging of data and displayed a memory chip a person can buy from Walmart containing “all of the hit songs from the 50’s and 60’s”. (I wonder how the copyright issues around that one had been addressed.) “The same thing,” he said, “could be done for books but there is something wrong with the economics and the publishing industry.” Roanoke (Indiana) public library He outlined how Project Gutenberg works. First a book is identified as a possible candidate for the collection. Second, the legalities of the making the book available are explored. Next, a suitable edition of the book is located. Fourth, the book’s content is transcribed or scanned. Finally, 100’s of people proof-read the result and ultimately make it available. Hart advocated getting the book out sooner rather than later. “It does not have to be perfect, and we can always the fix errors later.” He described how the first Project Gutenberg item came into existence. In a very round-about and haphazard way, he enrolled in college. Early on he gravitated towards the computer room because it was air conditioned. Through observation he learned how to use the computer, and to do his part in making the expense of the computer worthwhile, he typed out the United States Declaration of the Independence on July 4th, 1971. “Typing the books is fun,” he said. “It provides a means for reading in ways you had never read them before. It is much more rewarding than scanning.” As a person who recently learned how to bind books and as a person who enjoys writing in books, I asked Mr. Hart to compare & contrast ebooks, electronic texts, and codexes. “The things Project Gutenberg creates are electronic texts, not ebooks. They are small, portable, easily copyable, and readable by any device. If you can’t read a plain text document on your computer, then you have much bigger problems. Moreover, there is an enormous cost-benefit compared to printed books. Electronic texts are cheap.” Unfortunately, he never really answered the question. Maybe I should have phrased it differently and asked him, the way Paul did, to compare the experience of reading physical books and electronic texts. “I don’t care if it looks like a book. Electronic texts allow me to do more reading.” “Two people invented open source. Me and Richard Stallman,” he said. Well, I don’t think this is exactly true. Rather, Richard Stahlman invented the concept of GNU software, and Michael Hart may have invented the concept of open access publishing. But the subtle differences between open source software and open access publishing are lost on most people. In both cases the content is “free”. I guess I’m too close to the situation. I too see open source software distribution and open access publishing having more things in common than differences. church stained glass “I knew Project Gutenberg was going to be success when I was talking on the telephone with a representative of the Common Knowledge project and heard a loud crash on the other end of the line. It turns out the representative’s son and friends had broken an annorandak chair while clamoring to read an electronic text.” In any case, he was fanatically passionate about giving away electronic texts. He sited the World eBook Fair, and came to the presentation with plenty of CD’s for distribution. In the end I had my picture taken with Mr. Hart. We then all retired to the basement for punch and cake where we sang Happy Birthday to Michael. Two birthdays celebrated at the same time. Reflection Michael and Eric Many people are drawn to the library profession as a matter of principle. Service to others. Academic freedom. Preservation of the historical record. I must admit that I am very much the same way. I was drawn to librarianship for two reasons. First, as a person with a BA in philosophy, I saw libraries as a places full of ideas, literally. Second, I saw the profession as a growth industry because computers could be used to disseminate the content of books. In many ways my gut feelings were accurate, but at the same time they were misguided because much of librarianship surrounds workflows, processes that are only a couple of steps away from factory work, and the curation of physical items. To me, just like Mr. Hart, the physical item is not as important as what it manifests. It is not about the book. Rather, it is what is inside the book. Us librarians have tied our identities to the physical book in such a way to be limiting. We have pegged ourselves, portrayed a short-sighted vision, and consequently painted ourselves into a corner. It the carpenter a hammer expert? Is the surgeon a scalpel technician? No, they are builders and healers, respectively. Why must librarianship be identified with books? I have benefited from Mr. Hart’s work. My Alex Catalogue of Electronic Texts contains many Project Gutenberg texts. Unlike the books from the Internet Archive, the texts are much more amenable to digital humanities computing techniques because they have been transcribed by humans and not scanned by computers. At the same time, the Project Gutenberg texts are not formatted as well for printing or screen display as PDF versions of the same. This is why the use of electronic texts and ebooks is not an either/or situation but rather a both/and, especially when it comes to analysis. Read a well-printed book. Identify item of interest. Locate item in electronic version of book. Do analysis. Return to printed book. The process could work just as well the other way around. Ask a question of the electronic text. Get one or more answers. Examine them in the context of the printed word. Both/and, not either/or. The company was great, and the presentation was inspiring. I applaud Michael Hart for his vision and seemingly undying enthusiasm. His talk made me feel like I really am on the right track, but change takes time. The free distribution of data and information — whether the meaning of free be denoted as liberty or gratis — is the right thing to do for society in general. We all benefit, and therefore the individual benefits as well. The political “realities” of the situation are more like choices and not Platonic truths. They represent immediate objectives as opposed to long-term strategic goals. I guess this is what you get when you mix the corporeal and ideal natures of humanity. Who would have known that a trip to Roanoke would turn out to be a reflection of what it means to be human. Published by Eric Lease Morgan Artist- and Librarian-At-Large View all posts by Eric Lease Morgan Posted on March 7, 2010March 11, 2010Author Eric Lease MorganCategories Alex Catalogue, TraveloguesTags Michael Hart, Project Gutenberg, Roanoke (Indiana) 5 thoughts on “Michael Hart in Roanoke (Indiana)” Mike Rylander says: March 7, 2010 at 9:05 pm Just one minor correction, INCOLSA has nothing to do with Evergreen Indiana or the Indiana State Library’s Open Source ILS Initiative. INCOLSA is a separate consortium. Eric Lease Morgan says: March 8, 2010 at 7:26 am Thank you, and fixed. My bad. Markus Fischer says: March 11, 2010 at 3:50 am Should be Richard Stallman and not Stahlman. Open Source has this important component of beeing allowed to change the code and use it for other projects (the coders view), where Open Access has an emphasis on the unrestricted use of the content (the users view). Eric Lease Morgan says: March 11, 2010 at 7:31 am Typo fixed. Thank you. “Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow.” Brian Secor says: October 26, 2010 at 5:20 pm Dear Eric: Thank you so much for your highlighting the Friends of the Library Celebration of the 100th Birthday of the Roanoke Public Library! As president of the Roanoke Public Library Board, I appreciate what you have written and how the Michael Hart presentation impacted you. I too find it fascinating that we are so tied to physical books that we tend to forget that the purpose of libraries is to provide information retrieval of various media and not just one particular kind to as many people as possible. Even library boards don’t get that concept too well! Just by way of clarification, the Evergreen Indiana system provides us access to over 72 libraries, including the State Library, at no charge to our patrons. Individuals may request materials not in our library from any one of those libraries, have them delivered to our site, pick them up here and then return them here after a three week period. In addition, Evergreen Indiana provides computer cataloguing and check out systems at no charge to the local library. Not only does it enhance our collection and provide greater access to materials, I believe it is the wave of the future in Indiana as we move to an integrated shared system of materials in this state. Also, our current library has 1400 square feet of space and about 14,000 volumes in house. Evergreen Indiana gives our patrons access to over 3 million items across the state. Again, thanks for being at our program and for the video. It and the text were great! Sincerely, Brian W. Secor President, Roanoke Public Library Board Comments are closed. Post navigation Previous Previous post: Preservationists have the most challenging job Next Next post: Alex Catalogue Widget Proudly powered by WordPress