id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_eteaf7faxrgkvenosvjmb63sxu	John D. Norton	Cosmic Confusions: Not Supporting versus Supporting Not*	2010	27	.pdf	application/pdf	9993	868	65	an hypothesis H, a Bayesian analysis conflates the cases of evidence not supporting H with one ends up assigning neutral support the formal properties of evidential disfavoring. In the following, Section 2 will develop a simple example of neutral evidential support in misdescription of neutrality of support by a probability measure leads to the "inductive arise as an artifact of the inability of the Bayesian system to represent neutral evidential support. A clear example of complete neutrality of support in cosmology arises in a more extreme If a probability measure is able to represent degrees of evidential support at all, then a probability P(H|E) near unity must represent the case of evidence E providing strong support for merely assigns a very low probability to each possible outcome; that is the case of evidential probability measure to represent neutral evidential support, we introduce artifacts into our results 	./cache/work_eteaf7faxrgkvenosvjmb63sxu.pdf	./txt/work_eteaf7faxrgkvenosvjmb63sxu.txt