id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_fmm6hassp5fqjesdxvuezwe3py	Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla	Rhetoric, Induction, and the Free Speech Dilemma*	2006	19	.pdf	application/pdf	8453	472	62	Scientists can choose different claims as interpretations of the results of their research. The figures in Table 1 are inspired, nevertheless, by the 'cognitive utility functions' employed in Bayesian approaches to scientific reasoning, particularly those of the first row, corresponding to the acceptance The Free Speech model describes the optimum choice of a claim by a 'recognition seeking' scientist to represent First, notice that (according to Table 1) the maximum utility that readers can get by rejecting a claim corresponds to the case where p(t, e) p (6.i) If the author's optimum is to the left of the readers' acceptance the author's optimum, the point (0, h(0)) is better for readers, and leaves the readers, whereas for all points to the left of the author's optimum, (12) If a is preferred by readers to all other points on h better confirmed than a, then referees will try to reject the author's claim.	./cache/work_fmm6hassp5fqjesdxvuezwe3py.pdf	./txt/work_fmm6hassp5fqjesdxvuezwe3py.txt