id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_ohckdac7xzgt7cprj2i3tekvte	Robert A. Wilson	Pluralism, Entwinement, and the Levels of Selection	2003	22	.pdf	application/pdf	10459	654	53	The theories that were launched as alternatives to group selection are merely different ways of looking at evolution in group structured populations" Model pluralism has proven popular recently amongst biologists working on the levels of selection (Dugatkin and Reeve 1994, Grafen 1984, positing higher-level processes, such as group selection, do not differ significantly or fundamentally from models positing lower-level processes, Hence, the differences here between broad-sense individual and group selection perspectives are in the Dugatkin and Reeve claim that "the mathematics of the gene-, individual-, kinand new group-selection approaches are equivalent" and The fitness structure in the multi-level perspective, by contrast, is parameterized in such a way as to reflect the group pluralism shares this intuition but adopts a realist view of whether selection is operating at the genic, individual, or group level (or all three) in	./cache/work_ohckdac7xzgt7cprj2i3tekvte.pdf	./txt/work_ohckdac7xzgt7cprj2i3tekvte.txt