id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_vxuzih4vhjatxerrlszizp3pme	R. Neta	What Evidence Do You Have?	2008	31	.pdf	application/pdf	15867	836	64	Second, and less obviously, your evidence globally constrains your epistemically rational degrees of confidence, as follows: for any hypothesis h, your confidence in h at a particular time t should be—as a matter of epistemic rationality—proportional to the degree to which the total evidence that h. And epistemic rationality does not require that your confidence in h be proportional to the degree to which only a proper part of your evidence supports what epistemic rationality requires is that your confidence in h at t be proportional to the degree to which h is supported by all and only the evidence that stated above about epistemic rationality, evidence, and degree of confidence, total evidence implies that epistemic rationality issues requirements concerning epistemic rationality requires that our confidence in a hypothesis be proportional to the support that our total evidence gives that hypotheses; but if the our evidence to determine our rational degrees of confidence in hypotheses	./cache/work_vxuzih4vhjatxerrlszizp3pme.pdf	./txt/work_vxuzih4vhjatxerrlszizp3pme.txt