[PDF] A Discussion of Criteria for Non-ad-hoc-ness in the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes | Semantic Scholar Skip to search formSkip to main content> Semantic Scholar's Logo Search Sign InCreate Free Account You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly. DOI:10.1007/BF01801335 Corpus ID: 56085141A Discussion of Criteria for Non-ad-hoc-ness in the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes @inproceedings{Carrier1988ADO, title={A Discussion of Criteria for Non-ad-hoc-ness in the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes}, author={M. Carrier}, year={1988} } M. Carrier Published 1988 Philosophy, Sociology Das Problem, unter welchen Bedingungen eine Hypothese oder Theorienmodifikation als methodologisch akzeptabel gilt, wird in der wissenschaftheoretischen Tradition als die Frage des Ad-Hoc-Charakters von Hypothesen diskutiert. Das gleichartige Problem tritt aber auch in Lakatos' Methodologie wissenschaftlicher Forschungsprogramme auf, welche von methodologisch zulassigen Theorienanderungen die Vorhersage ‚neuer Tatsachen‘, verlangt. Uber diesen Begriff der neuen Tatsache und damit der… Expand View via Publisher pub.uni-bielefeld.de Save to Library Create Alert Cite Launch Research Feed Share This Paper 12 CitationsHighly Influential Citations 1 Background Citations 2 View All 12 Citations Citation Type Citation Type All Types Cites Results Cites Methods Cites Background Has PDF Publication Type Author More Filters More Filters Filters Sort by Relevance Sort by Most Influenced Papers Sort by Citation Count Sort by Recency Die Wahrheit des Irrtums J. Mittelstrass 1987 5 Save Alert Research Feed Theory Success: Some Evaluative Clues María Caamaño-Alegre Philosophy 2015 PDF View 1 excerpt, cites background Save Alert Research Feed Ad Hoc Hypothesis Generation as Enthymeme Resolution W. Park Psychology 2016 Save Alert Research Feed How Not to Be Lakatos Intolerant: Appraising Progress in IR Research Colin Elman, M. Elman Sociology 2002 60 Save Alert Research Feed Explaining Scientific Progress: Lakatos’ Methodological Account of Kuhnian Patterns of Theory Change M. Carrier Computer Science 2002 7 Save Alert Research Feed Explanatory Typologies in Qualitative Studies of International Politics Colin Elman Sociology International Organization 2005 236 Save Alert Research Feed Novel Predictions: From Empiricism to Unificationism Nicholas Havrilla Philosophy 2013 Save Alert Research Feed A Philosophical Approach to MOND: Assessing the Milgromian Research Program in Cosmology D. Merritt Mathematics 2020 3 Save Alert Research Feed Second Thoughts On 'second Thoughts': Reconsidering The Lakatosian Progress Of 'the General Theory.' D. W. Hands Economics 1990 13 Save Alert Research Feed Explaining Scientific Progress: Lakatos' Methodological Account Of Kuhnian Patterns Of G. K. L. Kvasz, M. Stoltzner Sociology 2002 1 Highly Influenced PDF View 5 excerpts, cites background Save Alert Research Feed ... 1 2 ... References SHOWING 1-10 OF 49 REFERENCES SORT BYRelevance Most Influenced Papers Recency Logical versus Historical Theories of Confirmation A. Musgrave Philosophy The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1974 209 View 2 excerpts, references background Save Alert Research Feed Justifying a Theory Vs. Giving Good Reasons for Preferring a Theory Gerard Radnitzky Sociology, Philosophy 1979 9 View 2 excerpts, references background Save Alert Research Feed The methodology of research projects: A sketch J. Agassi Sociology 1977 1 View 1 excerpt Save Alert Research Feed Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes I. Lakatos Political Science 1976 4,645 PDF Save Alert Research Feed Progress and Rationality in Science S. Haack, G. Radnitzky, G. Andersson Philosophy 1978 72 Highly Influential View 4 excerpts, references background Save Alert Research Feed Predicting Novel Facts M. Gardner Mathematics The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1982 56 View 1 excerpt, references background Save Alert Research Feed Wissenschaftsgeschichte, rationale Rekonstruktion und die Begründung von Methodologien M. Carrier Sociology 1986 5 PDF View 1 excerpt, references methods Save Alert Research Feed The methodology of scientific research programmes: Why did Copernicus's research programme supersede Ptolemy's? E. Zahar Philosophy 1978 35 View 2 excerpts, references background Save Alert Research Feed Ad Hoc Auxiliary Hypotheses and Falsificationism A. Grünbaum Psychology The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1976 54 Save Alert Research Feed The Ways in which the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes Improves on Popper’s Methodology J. Worrall Sociology 1978 72 Highly Influential View 7 excerpts, references background Save Alert Research Feed ... 1 2 3 4 5 ... Related Papers Abstract 12 Citations 49 References Related Papers Stay Connected With Semantic Scholar Sign Up About Semantic Scholar Semantic Scholar is a free, AI-powered research tool for scientific literature, based at the Allen Institute for AI. Learn More → Resources DatasetsSupp.aiAPIOpen Corpus Organization About UsResearchPublishing PartnersData Partners   FAQContact Proudly built by AI2 with the help of our Collaborators Terms of Service•Privacy Policy The Allen Institute for AI By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, and Dataset License ACCEPT & CONTINUE