The triall of the protestant priuate spirit VVherein their doctrine, making the sayd spirit the sole ground & meanes of their beliefe, is confuted. By authority of Holy Scripture. Testimonies of auncient fathers. Euidence of reason, drawne from the grounds of faith. Absurdity of consequences following vpon it, against all faith, religion, and reason. The second part, which is doctrinall. Written by I.S. of the Society of Iesus. Sharpe, James, 1577?-1630. 1630 Approx. 1120 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 208 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2007-01 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A12062 STC 22370 ESTC S117207 99852422 99852422 17745 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A12062) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 17745) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1475-1640 ; 1188:4) The triall of the protestant priuate spirit VVherein their doctrine, making the sayd spirit the sole ground & meanes of their beliefe, is confuted. By authority of Holy Scripture. Testimonies of auncient fathers. Euidence of reason, drawne from the grounds of faith. Absurdity of consequences following vpon it, against all faith, religion, and reason. The second part, which is doctrinall. Written by I.S. of the Society of Iesus. Sharpe, James, 1577?-1630. [16], 392, [8] p. Printed by the English College Press] Permissu superiorum, [Saint-Omer : M.DC.XXX. [1630] I.S. = James Sharpe. Misattributed to John Spencer (1601-1671). The words "Authority of Holy .. and reason." are bracketed together on the title page. Identification of printer from STC. Includes index. Part 1 not published. Reproduction of the original in the Henry E. Huntington Library and Art Gallery. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Protestantism -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800. Authority -- Religious aspects -- Early works to 1800. 2006-01 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2006-07 SPi Global Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2006-08 Emma (Leeson) Huber Sampled and proofread 2006-08 Emma (Leeson) Huber Text and markup reviewed and edited 2006-09 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion THE TRIALL OF THE PROTESTANT PRIVATE SPIRIT . VVHEREIN Their Doctrine , making the sayd Spirit the sole ground & meanes of their Beliefe , is confuted . By Authority of Holy Scripture . Testimonies of auncient Fathers . Euidence of Reason , drawne from the Grounds of Faith. Absurdity of consequences following vpon it , against all Faith , Religion , and Reason . The Second Part , which is Doctrinall . WRITTEN By I. S. of the Society of IESVS . Ezech. 23. vers . 3. Vae Prophetis insipientibus , qui sequuntur Spiritum suum , & nihil vident . Woe to the foolish Prophets , who follow their owne Spirit , and see nothing . Permissu Superiorum . M.DC.XXX . Tertullian . de praescript . cap. 4. Qui lupi rapaces nisi sensus & Spiritus subdoli , ad infestandum gregem intrinsecùs delitescentes ? Who are rauenous wolues , but deceitfull Spirits and senses , lying close to molest the flocke of Christ ? Caluin . in 1. Ioan. 41. Multi falsi doctores titulum Spiritus mentiuntur . Insurgunt multi fanatici qui se temerè iactant Spiritu Dei praeditos esse . Loquuntur priuato suo nomine , prodeunt priuato suo nomine , proferumt ex proprio sensu . Many false Doctours do feigne the title of the Spirit . Many mad men do rashly boast that they haue the spirit of God. They speake in their owne name , they go out in their owne name , and they vtter what they say in their owne name . TO THE CHRISTIAN READER . COVRTEOVS READER , This second Part of the Protestant Priuate Spirit , like a nevv-borne Infant , is at length , after long trauaile , come to light . I may iustly terme it an Agrippa , because it vvas hardly brought forth . It caused many great , and long gripings in the Mothers vvombe , in the Conception and Framing , but passed difficulties , both greater and longer , in the Byrth & Printing ( so hard it is for an Israelite among the Aegyptians to conceaue & beare such Infants . ) It vvas in danger to haue byn stifled vnder Midvviues hands : one vvas long sought for , hardly obteyned , and farre fetched ; and yet as a stranger , not so skillfull , but that many errours are committed . If therefore it come to thy vievv maimed & imperfect , blame not the Authour , excuse the Printer . Thou vvilt meruaile hovv this second Part gets birth and breath , and comes to light before the first . The reason is this : like to tvvo Tvvins they strugled in the birth , and passing the hands of diuers Midvviues , this fell to the lott of one more ready and skillfull , and so got the precedence of Birth-right ; vvhich yet in part vvas its due , as being first formed & composed , and that before the other vvas intended . For supposing the Aduersary as common & knovvne , to vvit the Priuate Spirit , vvithout discussing the quarrell , it assaulted him at the first , and so aymed to vvound Heresy in the head . But vvherfore then is this called the second , the other the first Part ? Because the matter or subiect so requires , this being a Confutation of the Priuate Spirit , the ground of all Protestancy ; the other a Proofe , or declaration , that the same Spirit is such a Ground to the Protestāts : vvhich at the first supposed , vvas aftervvard thought fit to be at large proued ; that therby it may appeare , that this Priuate Spirit is by the sayd Protestant Doctrine , made not only a Ground , but a sole and vvhole Ground of their Fayth and Religion ; yea that all other true Grounds are for that end by them neglected , and reiected . Which proofe of being a Ground ( the order of Doctrine so requiring ) because it is precedent to the reproofe of the same ; there fore the other Part , though later composed and diuulged , claimes the title of the first & this , of the second Part. In the meane time , if this , thus hardly brought forth , and thus svvadled in the cloutes of many imperfections both of pen and print , may giue thee Content ; & thy Content giue Vente ; and the Vente help on to the birth of the other ; my hope shal be , that as this Part may satisfy thee in the disproofe of this supposed false Ground : so the other vvill more satisfy , first in the proofe of the true Grounds assigned by Catholikes ; next in the contempt of the same Grounds vsed by Protestants , and that for the establishing of their false Ground , vvhich in the first Part is fully performed . Of vvhich if eyther the one , or both may ground , or cōfirme thee in the Truth & true Grounds of Truth ; this thy good shal be the fruite , I desire , of my paynes ; and my paynes shall thinke themselues , at thy hands , sufficiently requited , by thy good prayers , vvhich I desyre for my selfe , and further endeauours ; all to the Honour of God , and good of his holy Church . THE CONTENTS Of the Chapters , Sections , and Subdiuisions of this second Part of the Priuate Spirit , as it is Doctrinall , and confuted . CHAP. I. CERTAINE Considerations of the Meanes of Fayth , necessary for the vnderstanding of this Protestant Priuate Spirit . Sect. 1. Of six meanes , and helps to attaine Fayth . Sect. 2. Of the order and necessity of these meanes . Sect. 3. How the Protestants want all these 6. meanes of faith . Sect. 4. How the Catholikes and Protestants differ in these six meanes ; and how the Protestants make their Priuate Spirit the only meanes for all . CHAP. II. THE Priuate spirits interpretation of Scripture , deciding of Controuersies , and iudging of Fayth , confuted by holy Scripture . Sect. 1. Out of the 1. S. Iohn 4.1 . S. Paul. 1. Tim. 4.11 . Act. 20.30 . 2. Pet. 2. describing this Spirit . Sect. 2. Out of 2. Pet 1.20 . making the same spirit authour , and interpreter of Scripture . Sect. 3. Out of 1. Cor. 12.8 . prouing the interpretation of Scripture to be a gift gratis giuē , not cōmon to al faithfull . Sect. 4. Out of Ezech. 13. describing in false Prophets this Priuate Spirit , with the effects and punishment of it . Sect. 5. Out of Iob 32. declaring in Eliu his friends spirit , the manner of proceeding of this Priuate spirit . Sect. 6. Out of Tit. 3.10 . shewing the Spirit of an Hereticke . Sect. 7. Out of diuers places of Scripture condemning the relying vpon our owne iudgment . CHAP. III. THE Priuate Spirits interpreting of holy Scripture , and iudging of Mysteries of Faith , and Controuersies , confuted by the testimony of auncient Fathers . CHAP. IV. THE Priuate Spirits interpreting of Scripture , and iudging of Controuersies , confuted by reasons drawn from the difficulty of discerning of Spirits . Sect. 1. Of the diuersity of Spirits . Sect. 2. Of the difficulty to discerne these Spirits . Sect. 3. Of the difficulty and vncertainty of the rules of discerning spirits . Sect. 4. Of the subtilty of Sathan , in deceiuing by the similitude of spirits . Sect. 5. The difficulty to discerne spirits , proued by Scripture . CHAP. V. THE Priuate Spirits authority to interprete Scripture , and iudge of Controuersies , confuted by the true infallible authority , and meanes of interpreting scripture . Sect. 1. What interpretation , authority , and meanes are necessary , and infallible for the sense of Scripture . Subd . 1. What interpretation of scripture is necessary . 2. Who haue authority to make this interpretation . 3. What meanes are to be vsed by these interpreters , to make this interpretation : and of 4. rules of infallible interpreting of Scripture . Sect. 2. That the priuate Spirit cannot haue this infallible authority , and be this infallible meanes , is proued . Subd . 1. By reasons drawne from the nature of the Holy Scripture , which is to be expounded . 2. By reasons drawne from the priuate spirit , which should expound it . CHAP. VI. THE Priuate Spirits authority to iudge of Controuersies of fayth , confuted by reasons drawne from the nature of a Iudge of Fayth . Sect. 1. The properties of a Iudge of Fayth . Sect. 2. The whole body of the Church cannot be this Iudge . Sect. 3. Secular Princes cannot be this Iudge . Sect. 4. Lay-people cannot be this Iudge . Sect. 5. The Scripture cannot be this Iudge . Sect. 6. Bishops , and Prelates of the true Church , are this Iudge . Sect. 7. The priuate spirit cannot be this Iudge . CHAP. VII . THE priuate spirits authority to iudge of Controuersies of faith , confuted by reasons drawne from the nature and certainty of Fayth . Sect. 1. The properties of Fayth , with the priuate spirits māner of proceeding . Sect. 2. The priuate Spirit cannot be a meanes of Vnity in fayth . Sect. 3. Nor a meanes of the certainty of Fayth . Sect. 4. Nor a meanes of the integrity and perfection of faith . Sect. 5. Nor a meanes of fayth , which is got by hearing . Sect. 6. Nor a meanes of Fayth which requires credible testimonies . Sect. 7. Nor a meanes of Fayth which obligeth all to belieue , & accept of it . CHAP. VIII . THE priuate spirits authority to iudge of Fayth , confuted by circular absurdities following vpō it , against Fayth . Sect. 1. Of the nature of a Circle , & the difference of Circles . Sect. 2. The Catholikes cleared from the obiected Circle agaynst their doctrine . Sect. 3. The Protestants diuers manners of Circles . Subd . 1. Their Circle betweene the scripture , & the spirit . 2. Between the spirit , and Fayth . 3. Between election , & vnderstanding of scripture . 4. Between the Spirit of euery priuate man , & of a generall Councell . CHAP. IX . THE priuate Spirits Authority to iudge of Controuersies of Fayth , confuted by doctrinall absurdities following vpon it , against Fayth . Sect. 1. Idolatry and heresy compared : and of 4. heads , and origens of all late Heresies , proceeding of the priuate Spirit . Sect. 2. Of absurdities which follow vpon the 1. head , Of contempt of all Church-authority , and relying vpon the priuate Spirit . Sect. 3. Of absurdities which follow vpon the 2. head , Of sole Fayth . Subdiu . 1. Agaynst man , making him as iust , and more certaine of saluation , then Christ. 2. Agaynst Fayth , making it false , contradictory , sinnefull , rash , presumptuous , and preiudicious to charity &c. 3. Against Christ , to whome it is iniurious , as a Redeemer , Phisitian , Lawgiuer , Iudge , Priest : and makes him ignorant , sinnefull , & damned for the tyme. Sect. 4. Of absurdities which follow vpon the 3. head , that is , Of Concupiscence being originall sinne . Subdiu . 1. Eight diuers absurdities which follow vpon it . 2. The difference between a iust Catholicke , and Protestant . Sect. 5. Of absurdities which follow vpon the 4. head , that is , Of absolute predestination to damnation . Subdiu . 1. Absurdities against man , leading to carelesnesse , despayre of saluation , and inability to be saued . 2. Absurdities against God , making him the Authour of sinne . 3. A Sinner . 4. The only Sinner . 5. A Lyer , and dissembler . 6. A Tyrant most cruell . 7. A Deuill . 8. Obseruations vpon the former doctrine . Sect. 6. Of absurdities which follow against Fayth , and the Creed . Subdiu . 1. In generall , destroying all Fayth . 2. In particular , against all the 12. articles of the Creed . Sect. 7. Of absurdities agaynst Prayer , and the Pater Noster . Subdiu . 1. In generall , making all prayer needlesse , or hopelesse . 2. In particular , opposing all the 7. petitions of the Pater Noster . Sect. 8. Of absurdities against the obseruation of all lawes , and chiefly the Ten Commaundements . Subdiu . 1 In generall , how all lawes are made impossible , and not obliging . 2. In particular , how many wayes the Protestant dostrine encourageth to the breach of all lawes , and to all lewdenesse of life . 3. To what vices in particular the same leads , chiefly to Slouth , Lust , Cruelty , and Pride . 4. Bad life . 1. In the common people . 2. In the Ministers . 3. In the first reformers of protestāt Religiō , confessed to be an effect of this doctrine . Sect. 9. The conclusion , comparing the priuate spirits doctrine with the Catholike Churches doctrine ; whether leads to the greater honour of God. CHAP. X. THE Protestants Obiections and proofes , taken out of Scripture , for the defence of their priuate Spirits authority to interprete Scripture , and iudge of Controuersie , are proposed , and answered . Sect. 1. Of certaine obseruations profitable for the solution of obiections . Sect. 2. The obiections for the priuate Spirits authority , answered . Sect. 3. More obiections proposed , and answered . CERTAINE CONSIDERATIONS OF SIX MEANES NECESSARY TO ATTAINE FAITH , All wanting in the Protestants , and suppressed by their doctrine of the Priuate Spirit . CHAP. I. Of these six meanes , which they be . SECT . 1. THOVGH , according to S. Hierome , Haereses ad originem reuocare , refut are est : To reduce heresies to their origen , is to refute them , that is , to shew not only the tyme when they did begin , but also the head , or foūtaine from whence they did spring , is a sufficient proofe , both of their nouelty and falsity ; & so to haue shewed the Priuate Spirit to haue beene the origen , & Mother which hath begot all late heresyes , which as a brood of such a Damme , haue descended from her ( which in the first Part is fully performed ) is a sufficient proofe that the same heresyes are degenerate from all diuine Verity , and are as so many poisoned streames descended from an infected fountaine . And though all Sect-maisters , who disclaime & delude the vsual receaued grounds of Christian religiō , such as are , Scripture , Tradition , Church , Councels , Sea Apostolike , and Fathers , and appeale euery man to his owne Priuate Spirit , do make this their Spirit the origē of their fayth ( which also in the former part is , I hope sufficiently and copiously conuinced , that the chiefe and prime Protestants before cited , haue done ) might suffice to conuince their doctrine of falsity , for that it is descended frō a Mother of such impiety : Though ( I say ) this , that hath beene thus proued , might be a sufficient motiue to breed a dislike of this Priuate Spirit , and of the doctrine springing from it ; yet because , that out of it all sorts and sects of heresyes , especially lately engendred , haue issued as so many vipers out of a dunghill : and because the confutation of it is the confutation of all heresies in their origen , and as it were a brusing of all late nouell opinions in the head , or a strangling of them togeather wiih their Mother in her wombe , ( for to proue the fountaine to be poisoned , is to proue the streame to be infected , and to conuince the Mother of adultery , is to proue the child liable to basta●dy ; ) it is a worke profitable , and ( I hope ) worth the labour to descend into a particuler confutation of this Priuate Spirit , and by speciall and seuerall kindes of arguments ( such as are the authority of holy Scripture , the testimonies of auncient Fathers , the principles of holy Fayth , the euidency of solid reason , & the absurdities both doctrinall and practicall that ensue vpon it , and the fruits and effects which haue beene produced by it ) to lay open the deformity , falsity , and impiety of this Priuate spirit , and to shew the inconueniences , absurdities , and blasphemies which ensue vpon the making it the whole ground of Fayth , the sole interpreter of Scripture , and the only iudge of all controuersies of Faith & Religion , which ( as is before in the former part shewed ) all Protestants haue done , and yet do . For the better performance of which vndertaken taske , and the more , both orderly to proceed , and more clearely to vnderstand the same , as in the former part we proued six groundes of Christian and Catholike fayth , vpon which it is built ; and shewed , that as the Catholikes do imbrace them all , the Protestants do reiect and delude them all : so it will not be amisse in this part , first ( before we enter the particuler confutation ) to propose to the iudicious Readers consideratiō , also six helps or meanes , by which ordinarily God vseth to worke true & Catholicke fayth , in the hart of euery true beleeuer ; and to shew that , as they are all , and euery one of them concurring to the true fayth of euery Catholik , so they are all wanting to all sortes of Protestants , and to their faith and religion , whereby both Catholikes & Protestants may discerne , as well by what kind of causes and meanes true Fayth is produced , as vpon how solid a groūd and foundation the same is builded ; and so al may the better be enabled to iudge whether of the two Religions , that is , Catholike or Protestant , be not only more solidly groūded , but also more diuinely produced . For which we may note , that as these six Meanes or helpes are necessary to Fayth , so three of them are necessary in respect of the Obiect belieued , and three in respect of the Subiect belieuing . In respect of the Obiect , the first is the Materiall obiect , or articles to be belieued , which as they are supernatural , and aboue the capacity of our vnderstanding , so are they to reason not euident and cleare , but obscure , both in their verity that they are true , and in their reuelation , that they are reuealed by God , and therefore are by fayth , for the authority of God affirming , belieued . And these are the B. Trinity , the Incarnation , Resurrection , Transubstantiation , Iustification , Glorification , and the rest which we belieue . The second meane is the Formall Obiect , or motiue why we belieue , which is the prime verity , reuelation , or testimony of God , who , as he hath reuealed all mysteries that we are to belieue , and as we are to belieue them , because God hath reuealed them ; so did he at the first reueale them all to the Prophets , and Apostles , from whome we are to receaue by Scripture , or Tradition all reuelations of all mysteries of Fayth , whatsoeuer are by any , till the worlds end , belieued , without expectance of new reuelations , by any new spirit ; for so did Christ himselfe make knowne to the Apostles , (a) All which he heard of his Father &c. And therupon the Apostles (b) are cōmanded to preach the Ghospell to all creaturs . And all faithfull are sayd (c) to be built vpon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles , that is , vpon the reuelations made by Christ vnto them , and by them deliuered by (d) Scripture , or tradition to vs. The third Meane is the Proponent cause , or condition necessarily required to our beliefe , which , as an infallible rule and iudge , is immediatly to propose to vs the verity , & certainty , both of the articles reuealed , and of the reuelation of them ; for as the articles are aboue our capacity , and the reuelation may to vs be doubtfull , and both are obscure ; and as the Scripture , and Tradition are not only hard & obscure , but also mute , and vnable either to explicate themselues , or expresse to vs the resolution of al doubts which may arise : therefore some Iudge , or Proponent cause in respect of vs , is necessary , which must be not only infallible , and vniuersall in it selfe , and able without errour to satisfy all doubts , but also knowne and visible vnto vs , that by it we may know the verity of all , both articles , and reuelation , as also Scripture , & Tradition : which proponent cause except God had prouided and left vs , he had left vs destitute of a necessary meanes to fayth , which is to deliuer and declare to vs what God hath reuealed , and so had not prouided vs sufficient helps to attaine to the certainty of beliefe : And this is the authority of the Church of God , or the Spouse of Christ , as afterwards shall be proued . And thus , are necessary in respect of the obiect , 1. the Materiall obiect , what we belieue . 2. the Formal obiect , why we belieue , 3. the Proponent cause , to assure vs of the verity both of what , & why we belieue . In respect of the subiect , who belieues , are also necessary other three helpes : First , a Speculatiue iudgement of the Vnderstanding , grounded vpon credible Testimonyes and probable reasons of perswasions , which doe make appeare euident to mans natural iudgmēt , that this faith is credible , and worthy of beliefe , and prudently may be accepted as more credible , & more worthy of beliefe , then any other of Pagans , Iewes , or Heretikes whatsoeuer , though it be not as yet for these reasons belieued as true . These euident testimonyes of credibility ( which according to diuers dispositions , doe diuersly moue , and perswade some of them one person , and some another , and which are only humane not diuine , and leaue as yet an impression only of euident credibility , not of diuine verity ) as they are in Scripture required , (e) Thy testimonies are made credible exceedingly ; so are they ordinarily to men of reason so necessary to their conuersion , that the Will , which is not moued but with reason , or shew of reason ( for nihil volitum nisi praecognitum ) cannot giue consent to any Verity of fayth , except it first be perswaded by some direction of these motiues of credibility . Wherupon ordinarily those who are conuerted from infidelity to Christianity without some one or other of these motiues , may be sayd to be too credulous ; for qui cito credit leuis est corde , He that giueth credit quickly is light of hart ; as on the contrary , they who are not moued by them sufficiently proposed , are Stulti & tardi corde ad credendum ; Foolish and slow of hart to belieue , and thereby are vnexcusable from sinne ; but they who with desire and deligence , with deuotion , humiliation , and resignation do endeauour , and duly doe enquire & seeke out the truth of Religion , are by inuincible ignorance excused from all sinne of positiue infidelity , vntill their vnderstanding be conuinced by euident reasons of perswasion that the one religion is false , and damnable , the other true and infallible . Thus these reasons of credibility are the first help or meanes in the subiect to illustrate the vnderstanding and conuince it of the credibility of the thinges belieued . Secondly a pious motion , affection , or disposition of the Will , which directed by the former motiues of credibility , and inspired by the speciall guift of grace , either preuenting or infused , doth first it selfe giue consent , and submit itselfe to obedience of fayth , then doth determinate the Vnderstāding to giue assent to the verity of the mysteries proposed . This pious disposition , first is supernaturall , proceeding frō the grace of God , (f) who workes in vs both to will , and to accōplish ; (g) And begins in you a good worke , and so our first motion to fayth , is of grace . Seconly , it is free , proceeding from our free power and will , (h) He that beleeueth and is baptized , shal be saued , but he that belieueth not shall be condemned . And so our free will concurs also to fayth and saluation , or resists by incredulity to damnation . Thirdly , it is necessary to the conuersion of the faithfull , & is the cause why some who haue slender ( yet sufficient ) motiues of credibility , & weake motions of grace , are freely conuerted ; whereas others , who haue stronger both motiues and motion , do obstinatly resist & will not be conuertd , according to that : (i) Certaine belieued these things which were spoken ( by Paul ) certaine beleeued not . And , (*) How often would I gather togeather thy children , & thou wouldest not ? And this is the second help , or meane working in the will. The third , and last help , or meane in the Guift , or habit of Fayth , which 1. is a permanent guift , or quality produced by God , & infused into our Vnderstanding ; 2. It doth enable and lighten the Vnderstanding ( which otherwise of it selfe is as able to see and belieue the high mysteries of fayth , as the eye without light is to see colours ) to giue assent , and beliefe to whatsoeuer articles are by holy Church proposed , as reuealed by God : (k) By fayth we vnderstand , or belieue that God is . It is the beginning and first ground of saluation & iustification , by which we first know God. (l) The iustice of God is reuealed by fayth : by which we liue in God. (m) The iust liueth by fayth : and by which we are prepared to iustification . (n) VVith the hart we belieue vnto iustice : We are iustifyed by (o) fayth . It is sometimes both obtained before grace of iustification be had , and also kept , after that is lost : so that many haue this habit of fayth , who haue not the habit of Charity . (p) Many of the Pharises belieued in him , but did not confesse him . (q) If I should haue all fayth , and haue no Charity &c. It may be lost , & that only by infidelity , or refusing to belieue , as it was in (r) Hymenaeus & Philetus , and in those (s) who erred from the fayth : (t) Made shipwracke about the fayth . (u) And fell from fayth . And thus it is lost in all Heretikes , who fall from fayth into heresy , and so loose their habit , by which in Baptisme they were enabled afterwards to belieue truely . And these three , to wit , The credible testimony , to conuince the Vnderstanding , to accept the articles as credible : The pious affection of the will , to encline the will to obedience of faith : And the guift or habit of Faith , to enable both Will and Vnderstanding , to consent and assent to the diuine reuelations , are those which are required on the part of the subiect , or person who belieues . The order and necessity of the former meanes . SECT . II. THE second Consideration may be , to ponder , first , the order and manner of proceeding . Secondly , the necessity and efficacy of these six helpes or meanes of Fayth , all as they are compared one with another , and all , as they haue their operation in vs. And first , for the order , we may obserue , that the māner which by God ordinarily is vsed , according to these meanes , to prepare and help an Infidell , or Heretike of discretiō , to his conuersion to true fayth , is this : 1. Mans Vnderstanding by reason of credibility , & motiues of perswasion is induced and disposed to accept this fayth , as credible , and such as in prudence may , and is before any other to be beleiued ; and his iudgement by certaine markes , and signes apparent and easy to euery ones capacity , is perswaded that this Church and company of belieuers is rather then any other , the true Church of Christ , by which he is to be directed in all particulars of his beliefe . 2. He is directed by the Churches authority , how to discerne betweene the verity and falshood of thinges declared , and betweene certainty of reuelation diuine , & illusion diabolicall . And by it is proposed and declared to him what in particuler he is to beleeue as true , and what to condemne as false . 3. The wil is inclined by grace to subiect it selfe vnto obedience , in consenting to fayth , & to determine the vnderstanding to yield assent to fayth . 4. The guift , or habit of faith , is infused into the Vnderstanding , that it may yeild a firme , and infallible beliefe , or assent to the articles of fayth , thus made probably credible , by reasons of credibility , thus proposed by the Churches authority , and thus made of infallible verity , for the authority or testimony of God reuealing , and affirming them to be true . In which act of assent consistes the essence , and perfection of diuine and supernaturall fayth . By which is apparent both the manner , and order how ordinarily God workes true Fayth in euery Christian , by these meanes , and also how faith is resolued and grounded vpon euery one of these meanes in particuler . For if we respect the disposing meanes by which we are prepared to accept of our fayth as credible , it dependes vpon the exteriour motiues of credibility , and so our fayth is resolued into them dispositiuè . If we respect the directing meanes , which propose and declare to vs in particuler , what we are to belieue , our faith depends vpon the authority of the Church , and so it is resolued into it directiuè . If we respect the efficient meanes by which it is wrought in vs , it depends vpon the guift , or habit of faith , and so is resolued into it effectiué . But if we respect the formall meanes , and finall resolution , why we doe belieue it , it depends vpon the diuine reuelatiō of God , and so is resolued into it , formaliter , and finaliter . Of which the preparatiue meanes , that is , the Credible testimonies are precedent to faith , and leaue only an human perswasion of the credibility of the verityes . The Directiue meanes , that is , the Churches authority , is also precedent , exteriourly proposing what in particuler , and why we are to belieue . The Effectiue meanes , that is , the habit of faith , doth interiourly cōcurre with the Will and Vnderstanding to the act of beliefe . And the Formall motiue , or meanes , that is , reuelation of God , is the formall , finall , and last resolution why we belieue infallibly such verityes to be true . So that if one aske , by what we are before prepared , and disposed to belieue the truth , it is by the credible testimonies ; if by what we are directed & guided to know the truth , it is by the Churches propositiō ; if by what we are assisted , and enabled to assent infallibly to this truth , it is by the habit of Faith ; if for what , and why we doe actually , formally , and finally assent , & belieue the same truth , it is for the reuelation of God. As therefore the Samaritans at the first were prepared by the womans relation ( who told them , that surely it was the Messias who had told her all that she had done ) to thinke it probable that he might be the Messias , and the woman was as it were a proponent , or propounding cause to them of him , (w) Many of the Samaritans belieued in him , for the word of the woman , giuing testimony , that he told me all thinges whatsoeuer I haue done . But afterwards hauing heard and conuersed with our Sauiour himselfe for two dayes , they now sayd : (x) Not for thy saying O woman , do we belieue , for our selues haue heard , and do know , that this is the Sauiour of the world indeed . So all Christians are first prepared by credible testimonies , & directed by Church authority , to the knowledge and certainty of that truth : but afterwards when the diuine reuelation it selfe , as the word of our Sauiour , is made knowne to them , then do they now ( formally and finally ) not for the testimonies of credibility , or Church proposition , but for the diuine reuelation it self , giue firme and infallible assent , and beliefe to the verityes or articles of fayth . And thus Catholike fayth is that , which is for probable testimonies accepted as credible , by Church proposed as infallible , by an infused habit effected as supernaturall , by diuine verity reuealed as truth infallible , and necessary to be belieued . This fayth is that , which is the beginning and ground of iustification , the way and gate to saluation : vpō which the Church of Christ is founded , and is as the life and soule of it , which maketh vs members and partes of Christs Church , we being by it , and Baptisme inserted into his mystical body , which maketh vs certainly & infallibly belieue , either expresly , or implicitè , all whatsoeuer articles of sayth God hath reuealed to his Church by his Apostles , which is a necessary meane , instrument , or dispositiō to our iustification , and saluation ; without which none are iustified , and by which , informed with charity , all are iustifyed : which is one , & entire fayth in all faithfull , who for one motiue , and by one proponent cause , do belieue all one doctrine , which being one and entire , belieue as they ought , eyther all articles of fayth explicitè or implicitè , or none at all , which ( by refusing to assent to any one article ( in which is questioned the ground of all ) is by infidelity lost to all : and to conclude which distinguisheth a Catholike from an Heretike , in that whosoeuer hath this fayth is a Catholike , and whosoeuer wants it , or looses it , is an Infidell , or Heretike , and so out of state of grace and saluation . And thus much for the order and manner of Gods working of fayth , by these meanes , in vs. Secondly , for the necessity and efficacy of these meanes ( though all and euery one in particuler be ordinarily necessary to true and diuine supernaturall faith ) the credible testimonies , as exteriour motiues , to conuince our Vnderstanding , that it may prudently accept of this faith , as credible and worthy of beliefe : the motion of grace , and habit of fayth , as interiour assistants , that the Will may not resist , but piously incline to consent , & determine the Vnderstāding to assent , and that the Vnderstanding may obediently yeild assent to the misteries of fayth : the materiall obiects , as those which we are to belieue , and the formall , as that , why we are to belieue ; all which are absolutly necessary to make fayth credible , free , and supernaturall , and without them , all faith is but humane , false , or fained : yet in respect of vs , and of our certainty of beliefe , a proponent cause , and that infallible , which can be no other but the Churches authority , is most important and necessary . And first , that a proponent cause is needfull all grant , because faith (y) being by hearing , and hearing by the word of Christ , some preacher , or teacher is necessary , to propose , and teach vs what is to be belieued by vs ; for as fayth depends not vpon reason , but vpon authority , & that of God , affirming this , or that to be true , and commanding it to be belieued ; so this authority , thus affirming this verity , must be made knowne to vs , by some directing or proponent meanes , or els we cannot come to the knowledge of it . 2. That this directing and proponent cause must be infallible , so that it cannot erre it selfe , nor propose to vs an errour , or falshood to be belieued for a truth , is proued : for since God requires of vs a certainty & infallibility of fayth , and this our certainty must be had by some direction , and proposition , by which it is proposed & made knowne to vs , what we are certainly to belieue ; it must needes follow , that this Proponent cause must be certaine and infallible , or els our fayth directed and guided by it , cannot be certaine . Thence it followes , that they who admit a proponent cause ( as the Protestants do their church ) and yet do admit it to be fallible and subiect to errour ( as all of them do their Church ) cannot haue any certaine and infallible fayth at all , as wanting a necessary , certaine , and infallible meanes to propose , and teach them this certaine and infallible fayth , which is confirmed by S. Augustine , who sayth , That if Gods prouidence rule and gouerne humane matters , we may not despaire , but that there is a certaine authority appointed by the same God , vpon which staying our selues , as vpon a sure step , we may be lifted vp to God. Thirdly , this certaine & infallible proponent , or directing cause is Church-authority , which Church that it may infallibly direct vs , & we securely rely vpon it ; first , Iesus Christ selected , and made it , not only his inheritance , (a) Which he hath chosen ; (b) Or his house which he builded and gouerned ; (c) Or his Temple of which himselfe is Priest : (d) but also , his dearest spouse ; (e) VVhich he espoused to himselfe alone in fayth and truth ; (f) As a Virgin pure and vnspotted , without corruption ; (g) Yea , as his owne body ; And one body with him ; (i) VVhich as head he nourisheth , cherisheth , and sanctifieth , making her glorious without spot ; (k) And which he hath purchased with his pretious bloud . Secondly , he priuiledged it first with his owne presence , promising to be (l) with it all dayes , euen to the consūmation of the world . Next , with the presence of the Holy Ghost , (m) The spirit of truth that he may abide with you for euer ; (n) And shall not depart out of thy mouth , and out of the mouth of thy seed , and out of the mouth of thy seeds seed for euer . And for what end ? (o) That he may teach you all thinges ; (p) That spirit of truth , shall teach you all truth . Thirdly , he armed it with all power and authority ; (q) To remit , or retaine all sinnes , to bind or loose whatsoeuer is to be bound or loosed in earth or in heauen ; (r) to correct & punish with the rod of correction ; (s) To excommunicate and deliuer vp to Sathā ; (t) And to determine all questions , or controuersies , as it should seeme good to the Holy Ghost , and it . Fourthly , he established and cōfirmed it ; (u) As the pillar and foundation of truth , that being in it selfe grounded in truth , and also grounding others in the same , it should stand so firmely , (w) that the gates of hell shall not preuaile against it . Fifthly , he gaue to it commission and charge (x) to teach all nations , and to preach the Ghospell to all creatures . Sixtly , he gaue vs warrant and security , that we might safely heare and obey it ; (y) He that heareth you , heareth me . Seauenthly , he gaue vs charge , and command by precept of obligation , that whatsoeuer (z) they shal say to you ( speaking of the Scribes and Pharisies in Moyses chaire , but à fortiori , of the Pastours and Prelats in Peters Chaire ) that doe you . Eightly , he threats and terrifyes vnder great punishment ; first of danger , and of contempt of himselfe , by contemning it , (a) He that despiseth you , despiseth me . Secondly , of infidelity , and losse of his fauour and grace ; (b) He that will not heare the Church , let him be to thee as the Heathen , and the Publican . Thirdly , of hell and damnation for euer ; (c) He that belieueth not , shal be condemned . All which doe proue , not only an authority , and that infallible in the Church to direct and teach vs ; but also an obligation in vs to obey & submit our selues for fayth , to the direction and instruction of it . And least any should doubt of this Church , what it is , the holy Ghost explicates the meaning of our Sauiour , & tells vs , that it is ; (d) Some Apostles , & some Prophets , and other some Euangelists , and other some Pastours and Doctours , to the consumation of the Saints , vnto the worke of the ministery , vnto the edifying of the body of Christ , vntill we meet all into the vnity of Fayth . Which Pastours he will giue vs , according (e) to his owne hart , who shall feed vs with knowledge , & doctrine . And how shall they feed vs ? by preaching and proposing to vs the doctrine of fayth ; for as hearing is a necessary meanes to belieuing ; (f) How shall they belieue him , whome they haue not heard ? so preaching , and proposing what is to be belieued by Church-pastours , is necessary to hearing , & so to belieuing ; (g) How shall they heare without a Preacher ? By which is apparently proued the necessity , and infallibility of Church authority for a propounding and directing cause , in matters of fayth and Religion . All which may be confirmed : First , by authority of holy Fathers , among whome I will cyte S. Irenaeus , and S. Augustine for the rest . Irenaeus that learned Doctour , and holy Martyr , sayth : VVe ought not to seeke among others the truth , which we may easily take and receaue from the Church , seeing that the Apostles haue most fully layd vp in her , all thinges which are of truth , that euery man that will , may take out of her the drinke of life . For which those thinges that are of the Church , are with diligence to be loued , and the tradition of truth is to be receaued . S. Augustine sayth : The truth of the Scripture is holden of vs , when we do that which pleaseth the vniuersall , or whole Church , the which is commended by the authority of the Scriptures themselues , that , because the Holy Scriptures cannot deceaue , whosoeuer feareth to be deceaued with the obscurity of this question , let him require the iudgement of the Church , which without any ambiguity , the holy Scripture doth demonstrate . In which is affirmed : First , that all truth is left by the Apostles in the Church , not in Scripture only . Secondly , that the same truth is to be learned and receaued of all by the sayd Church . Thirdly , that the truth thus receaued , is most true , and is to be loued , and followed of all . See more of the Fathers aboue in the first part , to whome I add a confirmation out of Luther , against himselfe , and his followers , who sayth , that , The Church neither can , nor ought to teach errours , no not in the least thinges , since God is the mouth of the Church , and as God cannot lye , so neither can the Church . Secondly , by Reason ; for since of all the rest of the means and rules also of fayth , there may be , and often is question & doubt , as for example , of the articles which be true , which not ; of reuelation which is reuelation of God , & which an illusion of the enemy ; of the motion of the spirit , which is of God , which of nature , & which of Sathan ; of the inclination of the Will , which is a pious disposition , and which an illuding affectation ; of tradition , which is diuine , Apostolicall or Ecclesiasticall , which not ; of Scripture , which is true , which false ; of true , which is the incorrupted translation , which corrupted ; of the incorrupted trāslation , which is the true sense , which is false ; and of the true sense , which is to be belieued as fundamentall , and necessary , which is not to be belieued as fundamentall , but only voluntary . Of all which , since , I say , there euer hath beene , and now is great question & contentiō , some infallible directing iudge , & propounding cause is a necessary meane , to end these & all like controuersies , and to settle and resolue vs in the assured certainty of the one or other , or els will the contention be euer endlesse , and we in our opinions restlesse . Among which seeing no other can be assigned but the Church , and that God hath giuen so large commission , and priuiledge for that end to it , as we haue produced ; it remaines that the Church and Church authority , is , of all necessary meanes of fayth , the most necessary for vs , to settle and satisfy vs , in the certainty of our diuine fayth . And thus much of the order & necessity of these six meanes , and chiefly of Church-proposition , or the Proponent cause . How the Protestants want all these six meanes of Fayth . SECT . III. THE third Consideration , is to reflect how that of all these six meanes necessary to diuine fayth , the Protestants haue not any one , but are defectiue in all . These meanes are either External as the credible testimonies , which by euidence of reason conuinceth that such a faith is credible , and may prudently be belieued , and Church proposition , which by the credit of authotity , assures , that the same is true , and is to be belieued , both which are externall to the person belieuing ; or Eternall , as the articles which are belieued , and the reuelation why they are belieued , both which are of eternal verity and certainty ; or Internal , as the pious disposition of the will by grace preuenient , and the actuall assent to fayth in the Vnderstanding , by the infused guift of Fayth , both which grace and guift , do operate and cooperate to the act of diuine , supernaturall , and catholike fayth : That these , I say , all and euery one of these meanes are wanting in Protestants to their fayth & beliefe , I proue . And first , that they want all testimonies of credibility , which may perswade any man prudently to accept of their fayth , we may suppose , and note , that these testimonies , or motiues are of three sortes . 1. such as may perswade Iewes , and Gentils to become Christians . 2. such as may confirme Catholikes to continue Christians . 3. such as may induce Heretikes to returne to be Catholikes . Of the first sort are many alleaged , by ancient Fathers Dionysius Areopagita , Iustinus , Martyr , Clemens Alexandrinus , Tertullian , Cyprian , Lactantius , Chrysostome , & Augustine , against the Gentils , all cited & proued by (h) Valentia . As for exāple in respect of Christ , the dignity of his person , the efficacy of his preaching , the verity of his predictions , and the vertue of his miracles . In respect of Christian doctrine , the manner of the propagation of it , not by power , eloquence , nobility , or liberty , but by the simplicity of simple , poore , and vnlearned mens preaching , and that to a faith aboue reason , & contrary to the inclination of flesh , and bloud . The confirmation of it by miracles , martyrdome , prophecies , sanctity of doctrine , and order of discipline ; the opposition of it by the violence , and persecution of Iewes and Pagans , and by the eloquence , & reasons of Rethoricians , and Philosophers , all in vaine . In respect of the Scripture , the antiquity of it , as extant before any writings of any Philosophers , & the consonancy of it , in the agreement of the old testament with the new , and of both in themselues . In respect of the Professours , their excellent wit , eloquence , learning , and vertue in it , their conuersions from infidelity to it , their wonderfull constancy , and fortitude in defending , and dying for it . All which haue beene vrged as strong motiues , against Gentils to conuert them to it . Of the second sort which may confirme Catholikes , or such as confirmed S. Augustine in his catholike beliefe against the Maniches , which he recites to haue beene , 1. the consent of people and Nations . 2. Authority begun by miracles , nourished by hope , increased by charity , and confirmed by antiquity . 3. The succession of Priests from the seate of Peter , to the then present Bishop of Rome . 4. The name of Catholike , neuer vsurped by Heretikes , speaking to strangers , but vsually attributed by them to Catholikes : all which did iustly keep me ( sayth he ) in the bosome of the Catholike Church . Of the third sort , which may reduce Heretiks , are such as the Nicen Councell , in the Creed , S. Augustine , (*) and others did alledge to conuince the Heretikes of their tyme , that is , 1. Vnity of the present Church with the ancient in doctrine , and vnity of the partes with the head by fayth , & vnity among themselues by charity , and to their Pastour by obedience . 2. Sanctity of doctrine , which induceth sinners to holinesse , and conuerts Infidells to christianity ; and sanctity of persons , who exercise good workes of piety , & confirme their doctrine and holinesse by miracles and prophecies . 3. Vniuersality , in name by which it is called Catholike . In place by being or hauing been extended , in preaching , or professing to all or most Nations , at the least successiuely . In tyme , by being ancient in beginning from the Apostles , and constant in continuing from them vntill this present , against al persecution of Gentils , Iewes , or Pagans . 4. Succession of Pastours and Prelats , who by lawfull succession from some Apostolicall sea , or from some who haue authority from it , and by lawfull ordination from them who are lawfully ordeined , can deriue their succession and ordination from the Apostles . These are markes and testimonies , which distinguish the true Church of Christ from al conuenticles of Heretikes , & do conuince euidently that to be the true church where they are to be found , and that to be false , where they are wanting . Which supposed , it is to be proued . First , that the Protestants want all these testimonies of credibility , which should make euident the credibility of their fayth , and religion , either to Pagans to conuert them , or to Heretikes to reduce them , or to their owne followers to confirme them . And first , because it will be to tedious to touch euery one in particuler , we will select the most principall ; and for the first sort , which may conuert Pagās , it is certaine , that whatsoeuer of the former motiues the Protestants can alleadge , either concerning Christ his doctrine , his Scripture , or his Professours , to proue Christian Religion credible to a Pagā , they receaued them all from vs , and our Church ; ( from which they haue receaued what they haue , either of Christ , of Scripture , of Sacraments , of Christian religion in generall ) therefore what these proue or confirme , they proue & confirme our Church and doctrine , not theirs . For the first of the rest , if we seeke Vnity of doctrine , among them it is not to be found . They haue not Vnity , either with the Primitiue Church , and Fathers , whose doctrine they reiect in free Will , Merit , Iustification , Prayer to Saints , and most points now in controuersy , as in the first part is at large proued ; nor with any head , or supreme Gouernour , of which sort they admit none on earth , but disclaime all supremacy in any person whatsoeuer for matter ecclesiasticall ; nor yet among themselues , who are diuided into many diuisions and subdiuisions of Sects and Heresies , that long agoe the number exceeded a hundreth , & now are so many , that they cannot be numbred . In all which as they want all Vnity , so they want all meanes to settle any vnity , in that they admit no iudge to decide any controuersy , and to silence any persons contentious . If we seeke for Sanctity , either of doctrine , or of persons , by holynesse of life or miracles , it is not to be expected among them ; for their doctrine ( which is for example , that euery motion , though naturall , of concupiscence is sinne , as well without , as with consent , that all workes , though the best , are sinne , that no good Workes doe merit , that no Iustice is inherent , but imputatiue , that only Fayth iustifies , that the Commandements are impossible , that Man hath not Free-will , that God ordaines , and creates Men to saluation or damnation , without respect to their endeauour or workes : ) This doctrine I say , is a speciall retractiue to detaine any man from attaining to any sanctity and perfection of life , as impossible and not in his power . For any kind of Miracles , they are so destitute of them , to confirme their new doctrine , that they disclaime all ; and because they haue none , they affirme that none are now wrought , or if any be wrought , that they are false , feygned , or diabolicall . For Holinesse of life , they confesse it to be so far from them , that as (n) Luther confesseth : Men are dayly worse , being possessed now with seauen Diuells , more then before , yea with whole troupes of Diuells , and are more couetous , crafty , cruell , and wicked , then when they were Papists . And the like is confessed by Caluin , Musculus , and others cyted by (o) Becanus , and the Protestants Apology . If we seeke for Vniuersality , they are ashamed to stile themselues by the name Catholike , which is vniuersall , but by the name of Protestant , or for distinction of Protestants , by the name Lutheran , Caluinist , or the like . Vniuersality of place they cannot challenge , because their doctrine neuer extended out of the limits of a few Northern countryes in Europe , nor euer entred Africa , Asia , or America . Vniuersality of tyme they cannot chalenge , because their Church had its first being but about an hundred yeares agoe , and this so apparently , that we can nominate the yeare when , the authour who , the place where , the opinions what , the mantainers and abetters by whome this doctrine had first being in the world , and the opposers who at first did , & yet continue to gainsay it : so as they disclaime expresly from this marke , not only denying it to be any marke of the Church , but also confessing that their Church was , according to some of them , seauen hundred , to others a thousand , to others twelue hundred , to others foureteene hundred yeares , euer from Christ ( as before is proued ) either not at all , or altogether latent and inuisible . If we seeke for Succession of Ordination from the Apostles , they either beg it from the Romā Church , which they account Antichristian , or els take vp a new one at their owne handes , and are Prelates and Pastours of their owne creation ; and for want of ordinary vocation from Christ , are content with an extraordniary of their owne inuention . By which , and much more for breuity omitted , is euident , that all testimonyes of credibility sufficient to make their doctrine seeme probable , and worthy of credit , are wanting to them , and their Church . 2. That the Protestants want the two externalll meanes of fayth , which is Church-infallible proposition , by which they should be assured & confirmed in the certainty of their diuine reuelation , & mysteries reuealed , in the certainty of their spirit and motions by it , and in the certainty of their Scripture , and meaning of it , is proued : because whether we take the Church Authoritatiue , for the chiefe Pastours and Prelates by whose authority it is gouerned , or Representatiue , for the general Councels in which the whole body in the assembly of Bishops is represented , or Collectiue , for the whole multitude of all faythfull belieuers through the whole world dispersed : Take it , I say , in which of these senses you will ( in all which it is the true Church of God , and of infallible authority ) yet in none of these doe the Protestants receaue any infallible direction or confirmation frō it . For if we respect their Pastours and Prelates , they are not directed by them , or obedient in fayth to them , but , by the liberty and priuiledge of their spirit , euery priuate person hath authority to censure and iudge them . If we respect generall Councells , they disclaime all , as before is proued , or if they approue any , it is so farre as their Decrees do agree with the fancy of their spirit , to which they subiect them , and so longe as they are pleased to obserue what is commāded by them , in which they will be free without obligation to obey them . If we respect the whole body of the Church they in their generall Tenents doe generally hould , that it may erre and faile in doctrine and fayth , and for practise do boldly affirme , that for many ages it hath fallen , and failed not only in doctrine of Idolatry , superstition , and heresy , but also in very extancy , and being of a Church , as hauing beene inuisible not extant , but dead , buried , and corrupted for so many ages togeather , as in the first part is proued : and thus they cut off al infallible authority of Church proposition , which more then the other meanes , they do in plaine tearmes expresly reiect and condemne . 3. That the Protestants want the first internall means of Faith , that is , a pious disposition , or inclination to belieue what is proposed by the Church , as reuealed by God , is proued ; because as a pious inclination of the will , moued by the grace of God , doth apply and determine the Vnderstanding of a willing and well disposed person , either to labour and seeke out such motiues , & testimonies , as do make the truth of Religion seeme probable , or to assent to such as are already proposed vnto it : so the obstinate disposition of a willful Protestant , doth refuse to giue any credit , or beliefe to any reasons , though neuer so euident , or to any definition of the Church , though euery way most certaine ; but resolues with out amendement to persist in his preiudicate opinion , notwithstanding any reason or authority to the contrary . By which his obstinacy , 1. He fals into heresy , by willfully following his owne opinion which he chooses , and carelesly contēning the authority of the Church , in that it defines . 2. He looseth his fayth which he receaued in Baptisme , & fals into infidelity , partaking with Heretikes . 3. He belieues no articles of fayth ( to which he assentes , though truly , firmly , and for the testimony of God ) by any diuine and Catholike fayth , which depends vpon an infallible meane , that is Church proposing authority ; but by humane fayth , wholy relying , and lastly resoluing his beliefe , eyther vpon the authority of some deceauing maister , or vpon the testimony of some wrested Scripture , or vpon the euidency of some deluding notes and markes , or vpon the seeming apparency of his owne spirit , and conceit . 4. He separates himselfe from the vnion of the body of Christ , from the benefit of the merits of his passion , from the communion of his Saints , both in earth and heauen , and from all participation of hope of glory in Gods Kingdome to come , & so remaines as a dead member , cut from the body , as a dry bough deuided from the tree , as a darke glimse of light separated from the Sunne , & as a small streame stopped from the current of the fountaine ; all which as they do presently decay and dry , or come to nothing , so he . 4. That the Protestants want the two internall meanes and help of Fayth , that is , the infused and permanent guift of fayth inherent in the Vnderstanding , and both enabling and illuminating it to the producing of the act of diuine supernaturall fayth , is proued : Because Protestants who hold that Fayth doth iustify , and that Iustification is not by any inherent guif and quality , but by the extrinsecall fauour of God , not imputing our sinnes vnto vs , must needs by consequence hould , & so for the most part do hould , that there are no infused and permanent guiftes , or habits of fayth , which concurre or help to our Iustification , but that all is wrought by the motion of a transeunt spirit : which motiō , as it worketh ( according to them ) in them by it selfe only , & wholy , all internall good workes , without any cooperatiō of man , or mans freewill ; so it is only a motion which worketh in whome it will , when it will , and how it will , al , and whatsoeuer it wil , in man to his iustification and saluation : by which it is euident , that as in all their opinions , they are neyther constant nor permanent , but are wafted with euery wind of new doctrine , and so fly from the beliefe of one thing to another : so they are not guided by any permanent guift or quality , but by certaine flashes & motions of an vncertaine spirit , which leads them from one vncertainty to another , and so leaues them in al , vncertaine . 5. That the Protestants want the first of the eternall meanes or helps of Fayth , that is , the materiall obiects or articles of beliefe , which are to be belieued , as reuealed by Christ vnto the Apostles , and by the Apostles left to their Successours , and by them to vs , and posterity , is proued . 1. Because they belieue many thinges as obiects of Fayth , which are not reuealed , eyther in Scripture , or Traditions , of which are many instances giuen in the former parte ; so do they not belieue many articles which are reuealed both in Scripture and Tradition ; for which cause they reiect all tradition , and in it , many mysteries of fayth , which the Apostles left only by Tradition , and refuse many partes of Scripture , and that chiefly , because they containe many points of doctrine , which they will not belieue . 2. Because as they admit many points of doctrine , into the number of their articles of fayth , which the ancient Church condemned for heresies , as contrary to Apostolicall doctrine ( witnesse the ancient condemned heresies of Heluidius , Vigilantius , Arius , Iouinian , and others by them reuiued ; ) so they cōdemne many pointes of doctrine as erroneous , superstitious , or idolatrous , which the ancient Church receaued for articles of Fayth as agreable to Apostolicall tradition ( witnesse all the poyntes of doctrine , which the Magdeburgenses and others before cyted condemne as errours , and staines in the ancient Fathers in euery age since Christ ) in both which they erre in the materiall obiects of Fayth , as well in receauing condemned heresies for Apostolicall verities , as in cōdemning receaued Apostolicall verities reuealed by Christ for erroneous heresyes . 3. Because , as they admit speciall Fayth only ( whose obiect is only their remission of sinnes and iustification ) for diuine Fayth , by which they are iustified ; so all other fayth , by which they belieue , for example , the B. Trinity , Incarnation , Passion , and Resurrection , and Ascension of Christ , with the rest of the articles of faith vsually belieued , they acknowledge for no other , but for a general Faith , common as well to the damned and Diuells , as to them ; which faith in the Diuel , and damned as it is no voluntary and free act , proceeding from a pious disposition of the Will , nor a diuine and supernaturall worke , depending vpon any authority of God reuealing ; but a meere naturall and necessary act of knowledge● , conuincing their vnderstāding eyther by force of experience , or by euidence of reason , or by apparent and euident notes of credibility , or by some manifestly knowne testimonies of God , of the verity of that which they belieue and tremble at ; so in the same manner , their Faith of the same articles , by their owne confession , is not diuine but a meere humane fayth , grounded vpon some generall receaued opinion , or vpon some meere human authority : and so what they conceaue of the generall articles of faith , they do not receaue them as any articles of doctrine and supernaturall fayth ; but as generall receaued positions , humane coniectures , and their owne selfe-seeming and chosen opinions . 6. That the Protestants want all diuine Reuelation , for which as the formall cause and the finall resolution , they should belieue al which is by God reuealed , is proued . 1. Because what they belieue , they belieue not for that it was reuealed to the Apostles by the Holy Ghost , eyther at Pentecost , when it did visibly teach and confirme them , or in successe of tyme , when vpon occasion ( as at the conuersion of Gentils ) it did reueale to them all the mysteries euer after to be belieued ( which Reuelation made to the Apostles is the formall cause of fayth ; ) nor yet , for that it is proposed to them by Church infallible authority , as a condition necessary to know what is reuealed ; but for that , it is reuealed to them a new , by their owne priuate spirit , from which they receaue all their directions and certainty , both what is reuealed , why it is reuealed , and also by what meanes it is reuealed . 2. Because the meanes by which Christ doth manifest and declare vnto vs his diuine reuelations , they eyther plainely reiect , or wholy subiect to their priuate spirit ; for the authority of traditions , by which part of the diuine reuelations are deliuered to vs , and the Proposition of the Church , by which we are secured of the certainty of them , they reiect and deny . The authority of the Scripture , which is an other meane by which God hath reuealed his truth , and which they chalenge as the only means both of knowledge & certainty of diuine reuelations , they wholy subiect to their priuate spirit , by which they are assured , which is true Canon , which is true edition , which true trāslation , which true sense of it . And so for diuine reuelation they haue neyther any at all , nor yet any meanes to know or attaine vnto it . And thus much of the Protestants want of all the necessary helps & meanes , by which true and diuine supernaturall Catholike fayth is produced , conserued , and increased in the soule of euery faithfull belieuer , and member of Christs holy body , and Church . How the Catholikes and Protestants differ in these six meanes ; and how the Protestants make their priuate spirit the only meanes of all . SECT . IIII. THE fourth consideration is to reflect vpon the aduantage , which we Catholiks haue against the Protestāts , and the difference that is betweene vs and them , in these meanes of Fayth ; and how that the Protestants do substitute one only deluding and deceitfull meanes , that is , this their priuate Spirit , in place of all the six former meanes of fayth . And first for the materiall obiect , they professe to belieue , 1. only the doctrine which is reuealed in scripture . 2. that only which is reuealed , in that one parte of Scripture , which they are pleased to accept as Scripture by their spirit . 3. that only , in that part of Scripture , which is according to their precōceaued opinion , so interpreted by their spirit : so that Scripture alone , and that not in whole , but in part ; and that part of Scripture , as it is expounded by their priuate spirit , containes all the articles of their fayth . We Catholiks do professe to belieue , first , al that which haue been wrot by the Apostles , or Prophets in holy Scripture , & that in the whole bookes of Scripture , as anciently they were by a Councell of Carthage , S. Augustine , & others receaued , & all in that sense as it was by ancient Church expounded . 2. all that which hath been by the same Apostls deliuered to posterity , by word of mouth , and tradition . 3. all that which hath beene declared to vs out of Scripture or Tradition , by definition of generall Councells . 4. all that which by continuance of practise hath beene by holy Church euer reuealed . 5. all that which by vnanimous consent of holy and learned Doctours , Fathers , and Saints , hath beene belieued : in this we differ and haue the aduantage for the articles we belieue . Secondly , for the formall obiect of finall resolution of Fayth , they belieue what they belieue , eyther for that their sense doth so perceaue it , or for that their reason doth so persuade it , or for that their priuate spirit doth so suggest it , and so they make their sense , or their reason , or their owne priuate spirit and phantasie , the formall motiue , and finall resolution of their Fayth . We belieue what we do belieue , for that God hath reuealed it , and that not a new , and to some one in particuler , but anciently to the Apostles , and by them generally to all their successours , and by successiō to vs , so that our doctrine , and our beliefe of it , is grounded not vpon any our owne sense , our owne reason , our owne priuate conceit , all most fallible and most subiect to illusion and deceit ; but vpon Gods diuine reuelation , as he is the prime verity , and verity it selfe ; and that not newly , but of ancient euer since Christ reuealed ; that , not personal , made to me or one alone , but Apostolical , first reuealed to the Apostles themselues ; that , not priuate to euery one seuerally , but generall to all faithfull vniuersally ; that , not interrupted , & at certaine tymes , & by fits , and to certaine persons made knowne , but continued , & by succession , at all times by all faithfull , and in all places receaued ; that , not fallible without ground & subiect to priuate illusion , but most infallibly grounded vpon diuine reuelation and Church proposition , & subiect neither to be deceaued , nor yet do deceaue : and in this we differ , and haue the aduantage for the meanes of Fayth eternall . Thirdly , for the inward assistance of Gods grace , and the cooperation of it , they challenge only certayne motions or flashes of a fickle spirit , which whether it be by illumination , or illusion , whether of grace , or nature , whether supernaturall of God , sensuall of nature , or diabolicall of Sathan , they haue no meanes to discerne , or ground to be certaine , and by it , as dust by a whirle wind , they are carryed vp and downe in a round , without freedome , reason , or operation of their owne , to what fancy and conceit , it violently wheels and forces them . We are assisted and enabled by the diuine guift of an internall and permanent spirit or habit of faith , which infused into vs , and alwayes remayning in vs , is , at any instant , ready with vs , and the cooperation of grace in vs , to worke both a pious inclination of the will , to dispose it without obstinacy , obediently to consent ; and also an actuall assent of the vnderstanding , illuminating and enabling it , firmely to assent to what is reuealed and proposed . Also we admit and receaue , besides this habituall Grace , other actuall , and diuers motions of grace , and of it , some either excitant , first to excite & moue vs ; or adiuuant , to assist vs , being moued ; some either operant , which workes in vs without vs , and our cooperation ; or cooperant , which workes in vs , togeather with vs , and our cooperation with it ; some either sufficient , by which we are enabled to be conuerted ; or efficient , by which we are actually conuerted . And in this we differ from them , and haue the aduantage for the meanes of faith internall , both for the will and vnderstanding . Fourthly , for the credible testimonies and motiues of persuasion , which may in reason persuade any man prudently to accept any religion , as worthy of credit ; They haue not any which may , either induce any which was neuer of it , nor reduce any which are fallen from it , or establish any who are entred into it , that their faith , doctrine , and religion is credible , as is before proued . We haue many , & those forcible reasons , perswasions , and credibilities which may in prudence persuade any Pagan neuer admitted to it , or Heretike reuolted from it , or Catholike setled in it , that our faith , doctrine , religion , and Church , may and ought prudently to be accepted , is credible , and worthy of beliefe . We haue , Vnity with the ancient and primitiue Church , with the learned and holy Doctours , and Fathers , with the holy Saints , and Martyrs , whose faith and life we professe , to imbrace & imitate . We haue Vnity with one head , our chiefe Bishop and Pastour , whose definitiue sentence doth resolue our doubts , doth decide our controuersies , & doth end our contentions in faith and manners . We haue Vnity of faith among our selues , all of vs , though distant in place , though different in manners , though contending for temporall state , or dominion , yet liuing , and agreeing in obedience , to one spirituall Superiour , in vnity of one faith , in conformity of one seruice , sacraments , and ceremonies . We haue Sanctity and Holynesse , both of doctrine , which giues holy precepts , and rules to auoid sinne , for the loue of God , & feare of hel , to seeke perfection , by mortification ; internall , supressing our selfe-will , selfe-loue , and selfe-conceit ; and externall , taming our passions , & affections , with pennance of fasting , watching , discipline , and the like . And also of Good life , by frequent exercise of prayer , meditation & contemplation ; by dayly practise of pennance , & of patience in persecution ; & by perfect resignation to holy Obedience , Pouerty & Chastity . We haue Miracles , & those frequent & apparent , of prophesying , & curing of all diseases , raising dead , dispossessing of Diuels & the like , all wrought in confirmation either of our faith , or sanctity , all for the conuersion of Pagans and Heretikes ; of which in all ages & tymes , we haue many , & memorable of most nations now Christian conuerted to our Religion . We haue Vniuersality , not only of Name by retayning the title of Catholikes , by which we are vsually distinguished from al sects , & no sect doth vsurpe it , to distinguish them one from another ; but also of Place , as being generally dispersed in all the parts of the world , Europe , Asia , Africa , & America ; and also of Tyme , as being reputed the old Religion , and being indeed so old , as haue byn yeares since Christ & his Apostles , who institued and imbraced it . We haue continued Succession and Ordination of Prelates , and Bishops manifestly & orderly deduced , without interruption of persons or chang of doctrine , by a perfect enumeration of successours , & Apostles , and Apostolical Seas , vntill this present tyme , & these our present Prelates , Patriarches , and Popes . We haue the rare examples of millions of Martyrs , Confessours , & Virgins , who haue with their bloud & life defended and honoured our confessed Faith , & Doctrine ; & the strange punishments of persecuting Pagans , Iews , Heretikes , who haue with their sword and cruelty , opposed and persecuted it . In all which we differ from them , and haue the aduantage of them , in credible motiues . 5. For infallible proponent cause , as they do not require or assigne any , yea ( as before ) do expresly reiect all , chiefly the true , that is Church authority ; so they cannot produce any which either can be a proponent cause , or if it could , is yet either infallible , or so much as credible , for them selues and their Religion . For their scripture is not to them a proponent , but ( if it were true scripture ) a reuealing cause , because in it is reuealed truth , of which reuelatiō there is need of a proponent cause to declare , which is scripture , & which is , among many , the true sense of it . Their priuate spirit ( which yet they make their proponent cause ) is so farre from being either infallible or credible , that it is not only most fallible and subiect to deceaue , yea and actually doth deceaue , and hath deceaued so many ; but also most incredible without any apparence of probability , eyther to them , who haue it , or to others who follow it , that it can be true , or direct , and declare any truth at all . We haue a proponent cause , so certaine and infallible , which is Church authority , that it hath for the infallibility of it , the predictions of Prophets , the promises of Christ , the declaration of the Apostls , the confirmation of miracles , the approbation of holy Fathers , the practise of all antiquity , & what not ? all to proue the verity , and infallibility of it , in directing , and declaring to vs , what , and why we are to belieue . And in this proponent cause also we differ , and that principally from the Protestants : and so haue the aduantage & prerogatiue ouer them , in the externall meanes , and so in all the meanes required to fayth . For the priuate spirit , in particuler , if it were a sole & necessary ground , & meanes of fayth ( as the Protestants without ground suppose it ; ) if euery Christiā lawfully might , & necessarily ought to rely vpon it ( which yet none can ) for the certainty of his Fayth & Religion ; if it were a secure ground to build vpon , and a certaine meanes ( as it is not ) to attaine to true fayth and saluation : yet with as great reason , yea & with more probability , might we Catholikes both chalenge it , & rely vpon it , then the Protestants may or cā . And 1. for the certainty of the spirit , that they haue infallibly the spirit of God more then we , what can they chalēge for it more then we ? What certainty can they claime more then we ? If they alleadge their bare word , & say they haue it , we can alleadge ours , and say also we haue it . If they alleadge Scripture , & say , they haue it for them ; we also can alledge the same , and say we haue it for vs , yea , and had it before them , for that they had , what they haue of it , from vs. If they alleadge they haue the true sense of Scripture for them , and their priuate spirit , we can alleage , we haue the same , and the same meanes to attaine it , as they : many of vs haue as great learning and knowledge in tongues as they , as great a care and desire of truth as they , as diligent paines and industry as they , as feruent prayer and deuotion to find , and obtaine it as they . If they alleadge the sense and feeling of this spirit within them ; we can alleadge , and feele as much sensible deuotion , and more spirituall ; as many inspiratiōs , & illuminations , & these more certain ; as great promptnes and readines , to obey Gods motions , & that with more humility then they ; yea in all these , we haue and can alleadge more then they . 1. The conformity in iudgement , with the ancient Fathers , Councels , and Church , with whome we agree . 2. The direction , and authority of our holy Mother the spouse of Christ , our Church , which we obey . 3. The subordination and vnion of our selues , with our Pastours & Superiours of the Church to whome we are subiect & subordinate . And all this haue we more then they , all making vs more certaine then they , all better grounded then they . So that we may confidently say with the Apostle , In quo quis audet , audeo & ego . VVhat they dare , we dare ; what they can , we can ; what they may chalenge for the probability of their spirit , we can & may chalenge the same , yea more then they , plus ego , with more reason and probability , vpon better safety & security . In the certainty therfore of this spirit ( if it be secure ) we are equall with them , yea many degrees aboue them . Secondly . For the necessity of hauing the true spirit of God in vs , and the efficacy or effect of the operation of it with vs , we Catholikes are so far from denying either , that we hould a necessity , and that absolute , of both ; affirming & that as a principle of our faith , that no person whatsoeuer cā truly and duly belieue any article of faith , much lesse al , nor do any one worke auailable to saluation , much lesse saue his soule , without the special presence & assistāce of the grace or spirit of God in him . In as much therfore as concerns the necessary being , and working of this spirit of grace of God in vs , in some thinges , we , and the Protestantes agree , & in other we differ . We agree , 1. In that both of vs graunt , and require an operation and assistance of this spirit of God , not only to true faith , but also to good life , 2. In that both of vs do graunt , & require this operatiō to be so necessary in euery one , that neither right faith , nor vpright life , can be attained , or performed , but by it , & that as the prime , & principal cause , and agent . 3. In that both of vs do graunt , & require this necessary and operating spirit , to be so priuate , particuliar , & internall in euery one , that it hath an effectual operation , or cooperation in him : & that so effectual , that to it is attributed the effect of our conuersion , & saluation . And thus farre we agree . Thirdly . We differ frō them , in these . 1. In the name & vsual manner of appellation ; for we cal it the grace of God , which as before , is of diuers sortes ; some gratis giuen , as the guift of languages , cures &c. some iustifying , as Faith , Hope , & Charity ; some actuall , as excitant , adiuuant , operant & cooperant , sufficient , & effectual , & the rest before mentioned . They call it , the spirit , or priuate spirit , or motion of God , as inspiring and working , whatsoeuer good is wrought in them . 2. We differ in the extension of it ; for we affirme this grace to be extended , offered , and giuen sufficiently , though not effectually , to all ; so that all , and euery one of reason haue sufficient meanes , and ability to know God by Faith , and to loue him by Charity , so far as is needfull for their saluation . They affirme their spirit , to be restrayned , offered , and giuen , only to the elect , & faithfull ( whome they make all one ) and that all others neither haue , nor can haue it ; but are by the absolut will and decree of God debarred from it , & therby made incapable of it . 3. We differ in the manner of operation of it ; for we affirme that grace doth worke , or cooperate with vs , and we with it , so that the grace of God , and our Free-will , as two concurring causes ( though Grace the more principall ) do ioyntly effect , and produce euery good worke of Faith , Hope , or Charity , or the rest in vs ; whereby our good works haue of grace , that they are diuine , & supernaturall , and of our selues that they are voluntary , and free , & of both , that they are meritorious , of more grace present in vs , and of glory in heauen , to come to vs. They doe attribute so much to the worke of their spirit in them , that they take away all cooperation of our free-will in vs , wherby they make man as dead , without all action , or operation , to any spirituall , and good workes ; & make the spirit so●e , & whole worker of all , in man. Fourthly . We differ in the nature and permanency of this grace , or spirit ; for we acknowledge grace to be an inherent quality , & permanent guift infused into our soule , which doth enlighten , & enable our vnderstanding to giue assent by faith to the diuine mysteries proposed , and inspire our will to be sorrowfull by contrition for our sins committed ; which guift once infused , is not so permanent , & perpetuall , but that the habit of Charity is lost by mortall sinne against Charity , the habit of Hope , by desperation against hope , & the habit of faith , by infidelity against faith . They , or many of thē , deny all infused guifts of faith , hope , charity , or the rest , & admit only a transeunt motion , or operatiō of the spirit , which working in man , without mans cooperation , when , what , how , and in whome it pleaseth , is neuer totally or finally lost after it be receaued , doth make a man alwayes faythfull and beloued of God , and doth giue that vertue to all his workes , though neuer so bad , that they make them gratefull and acceptable to him : so that according to them , no worke of a faithfull man , though neuer so bad , can make any enmity betweene God & him , God neither imputing it as an offence to him , nor man incurring the displeasure of God for it . Fiftly . We differ in the effect and operation assigned to it ; for we assigne the function , and office , for example , Of the guift of faith , to be the eleuation , & enabling of our Vnderstanding to giue assent to what is reuealed by God , deliuered in scripture , or tradition , and proposed by Church authority : Of the guift of hope , to be the inflammation of the soule , to loue God as our chiefest end , to desire him , as our greatest Good , to hope for him , as our good absent , and to delight in him , as our good present : Of the guift of charity , or grace , to be the forgiuenes of our sinnes , the sanctification of our soule , adoption to be the sonnes of God , title and right to the kingdome of heauen , and a valew , & dignity of merit to our good workes . They assigne to their priuate spirit a double effect , the one of proposing the obiect ; the other , of working in the subiect . In respect of the obiect it proposeth to them , what they are to belieue , and why they are to beleeue it , and how they are to know both . In respect of the subiect , it workes in them ( say they ) a firme and infallible assurance of all the former thinges belieued , so that they stand sure and certaine , not only of the Scripture & the sense of it , and of their doctrine , and verity of it ; but also of their spirit , that it is of the Lord , and of their saluation , that it is as due to them , as it is ( to vse Caluins owne words ) due to Christ , and that they can no more loose heauen , then can Christ , nor be no more damned , then can Christ . In which they attribute to their priuate spirit all the reason of credibility exteriour , and all the operation interiour , both in the will and vnderstanding , which they haue of the certainty of all their faith , and saluation . By all which is apparent , that as they made it the sole ground & foundation ( which is in the former part at large proued ) on which their faith is built : so they make it the sole meanes ( as is here proued ) and the totall cause , materiall , formall , finall and efficient , both exteriourly reuealing , proposing , and persuading , and interiourly working , or rather deluding them in the obstinacy , rather then certainty , of their supposed faith . And this priuate spirit , and this effect of it , is that , which they rest vpon , and that which in this second Part we intend , by the assistance of Gods grace , to confute , and disproue . THE PRIVATE SPIRITS INTERPRETATION OF HOLY SCRIPTVRE , Deciding of controuersies , & iudging of mysteries of Fayth , cōfuted by holy Scripture . CHAP. II. Out of 1. S. Iohn 4. 1. S. Paul 1. Tim. 4.11 . Act. 20.30 . 2. S. Pet. 2. describing this Spirit . SECT . I. THE holy Ghost , in holy Writ borh foreseeing , and also forshewing to vs , the abuse of this priuate spirit , the better to forewarne vs of it , & to arme vs against it , doth not only in generall , as it doth many other abuses : but euen in particuler , and as it were on set purpose , both plainely decipher , and describe it , & also fully confute , and condemne it . Out of it therefore , we will draw our first arguments of confutation , and by it conuince of falsity , this deceitfull , and deceauing spirit . And first to begin with the new Testament , for the more full instruction of our selues , and the plainer confutation of this spirit , I will for one proofe conioine in one argument , the testimonies of the chiefest Apostles , that is , of S. Iohn , S. Peter , and S. Paul. First S. Iohn 1. epist . chap. 4 v. 1. doth plainely giue admonitions against this spirit , ( 1 ) Belieue not euery spirit ; ( 2 ) but try the spirits if they be of God. Secondly both S. Iohn , and S. Paul doe giue the reasons why we should not belieue , but try these spirits . S. Iohn v. 2. Because many false spirits are gone out into the world . S. Paul , 1. Tim. 4.11 . Because in the last tymes certaine shall depart from the fayth , attending to spirits of errour , and doctrine of Diuells . Againe , 2. Cor. 11.14 . For that Satan himselfe , doth transfigure himselfe , into an Angell of light , that is , doth make shew of workes of piety , iustice , and deuotion , thereby to allure men , by opiniō of him , to his traps of errours & damnation . Thirdly , both S. Peter , & S. Paul , do shew in what sortes of persons is this spirit , & what fruits and effects it produceth in them . S. Paul briefly calls the persons , (a) Rauening wolues , who after his departure will enter among them ; and men who arising out of themselues , will speake peruerse thinges , and draw many disciples after themselues . S. Peter more fully describes the effects of it , shewing , (b) That it makes false Prophets , and lying maisters , who bring in Sectes , or ( as it is in the Greeke ) heresies of perdition . (c) Who blaspheme the way of truth ; (d) walke in the concupiscence of vncleanesse , contemne dominion ; (e) allure vnstable soules ; (f) promise liberty ; (g) speake proud thinges of vanity ; (h) entangle those , who flye from co-inquinations of the world ; (i) and turnes from the holy Commandement , and knowne way of Iustice ; (k) and being vnlearned , & vnstable , depraue the Scriptures to their perdition . These are the effects of this spirit , which that we should not belieue , for the foresayd reasons , the Apostle did giue the foresayd caueat , or admonition . In which we may note . First , for the former admonition , that there are diuers reasons , why we are not to belieue euery spirit . 1. Because there are so many , and diuers spirits : As one (a) the spirit of God , which is of God. Another (b) the spirit of man which is in man. Another (c) the spirit of the world , which is of worldly thinges . Another (d) the spirit of the Diuell , which is euill . One (e) which is the spirit of truth . Another (f) the spirit of lying , and errour . One (g) the spirit of wisedome and vnderstanding . Another (h) the spirit of giddinesse . 2. Because the effects of these spirits are often doubtfull , & not certaine of what spirit they proceed . 3. Because the similitude and manner of their operations , & motions is many tymes great , and hard to be discerned . 4. Because the art and meanes how to discerne , and iudge of them , is very hard , & not certaine . 5. Because the guift of discerning them is extraordinary , rare , and giuen to few ( of all which is fully treated in the ensuing Chapters , ) therefore great reason there is , not to belieue the suggestion of euery spirit : great danger there is in following the direction of euery priuate spirit , & great discretion must be vsed , before that any man , though learned and holy , much more simple and sinnefull , can either in wisedome and prudence giue credit ; or with safety , and security , rely himselfe , his fayth , and saluation vpon any priuate spirit , or motion of it . Reason therfore , and experience confi●mes the doctrine , and caueat of S. Iohn , That we should not belieue euery spirit . Secondly , we may note for the tryall of these spirits . 1. How , and by what rule , this tryall is to be made . 2. Who , and what sort of persons , are to make it , and apply the rule . For the rule and meane of trying these spirits , Catholikes assigne it to be the spirit of Gods Church , or of the chiefe Pastours in it , & gouernours of it , as consenting , or at the least not dissenting one with another : and as vnited , and no way separated by schisme , or heresy from their head ; so that what spirit soeuer is squared by this spirit , directed by it , and conformable in fayth , and manners to it , is infallibly the spirit of God. And what spirit of whomesoeuer is contrary to it , diuided from it , or separated from communion or society of it , is certainly not the spirit of God , but of man , the world , or the Diuell . And this is a way certaine to try spirits , and discerne which is true , or false ; good , or bad ; of God , or the enemy . For sith the spirit of God is ( as God is ) one and not diuided , (1) One God , one Lord , one spirit , one and the same spirit . In one spirit we are baptized into one , and in one spirit made all to drinke ; And sith the Church of God is directed by this one , and the same spirit , this spirit of truth , this (2) Paraclete , the Holy Ghost , which shall teach all truth : It followes that whosouer are partes of this Church , and members of this body (3) You are the body of Christ , and members of member ; must haue their spirit vnited with it , ordered by it , and subordinate to it . And see whatsoeuer spirit is contrary to it , or diuided from it , cannot be the spirit of God , but the spirit of the enemy of God. This is apparent out of authority of holy Scripture . The Protestants for the most part will haue this rule of triall to be Scripture ; for so is their common Tenet , that al spirits are to be tryed by the word of God : yet some of them , of more quick insight , finding this to be insufficient ( Because ( sayth Caluin ) they who say thus , say somewhat , but not all ; for except we haue the spirit of prudence to discerne , it will little auaile to haue the Scripture on the fingers ends ) therefore they assigne the consent of Church , or Councel , for vnity sake ( thus saith Caluin ) to be this publicke rule , or meanes , against those mad men who bragge of the spirit . But being vrged ( yea Caluin vrges it himselfe ) whether a man shall rest on the Councels determination ? he resolues , Noe. For ( sayth he ) euery spirit of euery priuate belieuer shall iudge of this decree , and determination of the Councell . If so , then as the publicke Councell shall try and iudge the spirit of euery priuate man , so the spirit of euery priuate man shal againe try & iudg the spirit of the Councel . And then what end or pause wil be of trying and iudging , betweene euery priuate mans spirit , & the Councells spirit ? And what certainty can be in either ? This therefore is a round , or circle , no meanes or rule to try spirits , if they be of God , as in the eight Chapter is more fully declared . And this for the rule of trying spirits . For the persons who by office haue right to try spirits , and apply this rule and meanes ; though the Catholikes prohibit none , yea perswade all for their owne satisfaction , to do it , so they do it by the direction of the former rule , & according to the modell of it : yet the proper office , & function to do it , they assigne only to the Pastours , and directours in Gods church , who by the authority of their function , and the ability of their learning , should in reason be more fit to discerne these spirits , and direct the people , in the discerning of them , and also by this direction , establish & keep a subordination of inferiours to Superiours , or of the sheep to the Pastour , and nourish and maintaine an vnity of of Faith and doctrine among both . The Protestantes giue this right and office of discerning spirits , to all , and euery faythfull person , to whome they giue liberty euery one to try and iudge their Pastour , yea all Pastours , Prelates , Coūcels , and their spirits . Whereby , as they infringe all Ecclesiasticall subordination , so they are expresly contrary to S. Paul , who doth assigne for one of the guifts of gratiae gratis giuen , ( which is not common to all ) the guift to discerne spirits ; & thereby also do open gappe to all confusion , and dissentiō : and thus faile , not only in the meanes how , but also in the persons by whome spirits are to be tryed . Out of all which ▪ I reason thus ; That spirit which we are forewarned not to belieue , which is to be tryed by another spirit , and that spirit by another in infinitum : That spirit into which Sathan (a) transfigureth himselfe , deceauing many , and making many false Prophets and rauenous wolues : That spirit which brings in (b) Sects of perdition , drawing many out of the Church , which causeth so many to (c) blaspheme the way of truth , to walke in concupiscence , (d) to contemne dominion , (e) to allure vnstable soules , (f) to promise liberty , to speake proudly , (g) to depraue Scriptures , (h) to turne from the Commandement , (i) and to draw disciples after it : That spirit which cannot be discerned , whether it be the spirit of God , man , or the Diuell ; whether of truth or falshood ; of wisedome or giddines , and in regard it hath so great similitude , in effect and operation , one with another ; That spirit , I say cannot be an infallible rule and iudge to interprete Scripture , iudge of fayth , decide controuersies , and direct euery man in the way of his saluation ; this is euident , and needs no proofe . But such is the priuate spirit , which euery priuate person , and sect-maister challenges to himselfe , as is before proued , and by experience confirmed ; in that euery Heretike , ancient , or late , hath by force of it separated himselfe from Gods Church , broached so many blasphemous opinions , contemned so highly all Church-authority , promised licentious liberty of the Ghospell , depraued so fowly holy Scriptures , and drawne so many into perdition after them , ( all which shall more at large afterwardes be confirmed : ) Therefore it doth follow , that this priuate spirit , cannot be a rule of fayth , able to assure and secure euery one in his beliefe , and saluation . And thus much of the first proofe out of Scripture , against this priuate spirit . Out of 2. Pet. 1.20 . making the same spirit authour and interpreter of Scripture . SECT . II. THE second proofe is out of S. Peter , who , 2. Pet. 1.20 . prouing the power , and present cōming of Christ , first by the eye-witnesse of some , in his Transfiguration , next by a more firme testimony , in respect of the Iewes , that is , the holy Scripture , ( which he commends for the effect , which is to lighten , as light in a darke place , and for the authour which is the Holy Ghost ) hath among the rest , these wordes : Vnderstanding this first , that no prophecy of Scripture , is made by priuate interpretation , for not by mans will , was prophecy brought at any tyme , but the holy men of God spake , inspired with the Holy Ghost . In which wordes S. Peter makes first a serious premonition , Vnderstanding this first , as a point of principall , and important consideration . Secondly , he layes downe his assertion in wordes plaine & powerful , against this priuate spirit , That no prophecy of Scripture , that is , no sense and meaning of Scripture ( for so are they called , (4) some Prophets , because they did expound the secret hidden mysteryes of Scripture , and foretell the ioyes of heauen to the iust , as S. Ambrose , and S. Anselme , with all others do expound it ) is made by priuate interpretation , that is , according to S. Chrysostome , Not by the spirit , which many bragge of , as the spirit of God , but falsly pretending it , do speake that which is their owne . According to S. Clement : Not according to the proper vnderstanding of our owne wit. Yea according to Caluin : Not by our owne proper sense ; for what we produce out of it , is prophane . The sense therefore according to the plaine wordes , and generall consenting interpretation of all , is , No priuate spirit , of any priuate man expounding Scripture , according to his owne priuate sense , and proper conceit , and fancy , is a fit meanes to interpret Gods holy word , of which thirdly he giues this reason , because not by mans will , or by any selfe seeming humane conceit , was prophecy brought at any tyme , that is , the sacred and holy sense of Gods holy word , neuer at any tyme brought forth and penned , but the holy men of God , the Prophets , and Apostles spake , and dictated , what they wrote , inspired with the Holy Ghost : that is , Because the Holy Ghost was the author of the wordes and sense of holy Scripture , in the mouth , and handes of those , who first penned it ; Therfore must the same holy Ghost be the expositour of the sense of it , in the mouthes of them , who rightly vnderstand it . And this to be the true sense of this place , witnesse , besides the former testimonies , not only the Rhemists , Bellarmine , and others , but also Caluin himselfe , saying : The spirit which spake by the Prophets , is the only interpreter of himselfe . Out of which place and wordes I inferre , first , that as the true text of Scripture it selfe , so also the true sense , and meaning of it , is a meane and ground of Christian religion , first and principally to be knowne . Secondly , that this true sense is not to be made by any priuate interpretation of the priuate spirit of euery priuate person . Thirdly , that it is to be made by the same spirit of God , which was the first authour , and dictatour of it . And out of this inference and euidence of wordes I argue thus . That spirit which must be the true and infallible interpreter of holy Scripture is , and must be the same , which was the first author and writer of it , as is heere proued ; but that spirit which first wrote the text of holy Scripture , was not a guift or spirit communicated to euery priuate person , though faythfull , but only to the Prophets , and Apostles , the first and prime pillars , and Pastours of Gods Church , as is euident . Therefore this , and the same spirit , or guift , which is giuen to expound the same scripture , is not a spirit giuen to euery priuate belieuer , but only to the Pastours and pillars of Gods Church , who as they are the successors of the former first pillars , and Apostles : so also they receaue the same spirit , to interprete the same Scripture , which their Predecessours wrote . As therfore the true spirit resided chiefly in the first Pastours , & pillars of Christs Church , to write holy Scripture ; so also the same spirit resides chiefly in their succeeding Pastours and Prelates to expound it , and not in euery faythfull , and simple belieuer , who can only read it . Out of 1. Cor. 12.18 . prouing the interpretation of of Scripture to be a guift , gratis giuen , not common to all faythfull . SECT . III. THE third proofe is taken out of those places of Scripture , which attribute this guift of interpreting Scripture , not gratiae gratificanti , or to iustifying grace , which is common to all faythfull belieuers , and adopted children of God : but , gratijs gratis datis , or graces freely bestowed , which are speciall to some persons only , and those not alwayes Saints , & holy men . For which we may note , that S. Paul , 1. Cor. 12.18 . of the 9. guifts of the Holy Ghost which there he recounts , and of which foure , to wit , 1. curing diseases , 2. working miracles , 3. prophecy of future euents , 4. discerning of spirits , are transeunt motions ; and fiue , to wit , 1. Wisedome , 2. Knowledge , 3. Fayth , 4. Kindes of tongues , 5. Interpretation of languages , are according to Deuines , permanent habits : of these I say doth S. Paul assigne 5. both them , and their proper function , to be about the deciding , or explicating of matters of beliefe , & interpreting of holy Scripture , that is , 1. Wisedome , which is to explicate the high mysteries of the Trinity , Incarnation , predestination , and the like . 2. Knowledge , which is to explicate either matters of manners , what we are to do , and how to liue ; or mysteries of fayth , by examples , comparisons , and philosophicall reasons . 3. Fayth , which is eyther without feare to professe , and preach what is belieued , or by contemplation , to penetrate and explicate the deep mysteries of beliefe . 4. and 5. to wit , Kindes of tongues , & interpretation of languages , which is to explicate obscure and hard places of Scripture , to interprete hymnes , and prophecies in strang languages , and to translate the Scripture into other tongues . All which in their seuerall function , and in diuers manners , are imployed in discerning iudging , and interpreting of mysteries of fayth , & difficulties of scripture . Secondly , we may note , that these guifts , doe not necessarily depend , and follow vpon iustifying Grace , and so are not common to all faythfull , or true children of God , but are speciall guifts & graces bestowed , some vpon one person , some vpon another , euery one as the spirit of God pleases . v. 11. not all vpon euery one . This is apparent , first out of the text , which sayth : That to one , certes , by the spirit , is giuen the word of VVisedome ; to another the word of Knowledge ; to another Fayth ; to another Interpretation of languages ; to another Grace of doing cures , of miracles , of prophecy , of tongues , of discerning of spirits . v. 8.9.10 . &c. Againe : Are all Apostles ? as heades ; Are all Prophets ? as eyes ; Are all Doctours ? as tongues ; Are all miracles , and hauing the grace of doing cures ? as handes ; Do all speak with tongues ? Doe all interprete the Scripture ? as Maisters ; no surely . For he hath giuen some , not all , to be Apostles ; Some , not all , to be Prophets ; Other some , not all , to be Euangelistes ; Other some , not all , to be Pastours , and Doctours , to the consummation of the Saints , into the worke of the ministery &c. Eph. 4.11 . Secondly the same is apparent by the comparison of this mysticall body , with a naturall body , which also the Apostle vseth , v. 14. &c , for as all members haue not the same operation , but some haue one , some another , the eyes to see , the hands to worke , the feet to walk , the head to discourse ; so in the mysticall body , all and euery one though faythfull , haue not the same and all guiftes , but some one , some another ; as some haue the guift of cures , some of miracles , some of tongues ; so also some haue the guift of Wisedome , Science , and Interpretation , but all haue not euery one of them ; therfore some must as Maisters , teach ; some as Scholers learne ; some as heades direct and instruct ; some as members be directed , and instructed : so that , as all members , are not one member , so neither hath one member all operations , or functions ; but according to diuision of graces , is also diuision of ministrations , and operations . v. 4. Out of which it doth follow , first ; that the guift of interpretation of holy Scripture , and explicating of high mysteryes of fayth , is a guift , not generall and common to all the faythfull , as depending and following necessary vpon Fayth , or grace , but speciall and particuler to some , as gratis giuen , to whome it pleaseth God to giue it . Secondly , that all faythfull , and iust persons , cannot be directed by this extraordinary guifte , in their iudgement of fayth , decision of controuersies , and interpretation of scripture , because it is not giuen to euery iust man , as is proued : not yet only to the iust , but sometymes to the vniust , as to those who cast out Diuells , in our Sauiours name , and yet he knew them not , that is , did not approue , and commend them . And out of these I argue thus . To interprete Scripture , and decide Controuersies of Fayth , is a guift , not giuen generally to all the iust or faithfull , by vertue of their iustification : but extraordinarily bestowed vpon some only , as a grace , gratis data : but the priuate spirit , according to the Protestant doctrine , is a guift giuen to all , and euery faithfull , by vertue of their iustification , not gratia gratis data : to some therefore the Protestant priuate spirit cannot be a guift , giuen to interprete , in euery one , the holy Scripture , and iudge of all controuersies of fayth . The Maior , is the doctrine of the Holy Ghost . The Minor , is the doctrine of the Protestants . And so the conclusion following out of both , is most certaine . Out of Ezech 13. describing , in false Prophets , this priuate spirit , with the effects & punishment of it . SECT . IIII. THE fourth proofe is out of the Prophet Ezechiel , who chap. 13. doth describe , and decypher to vs , 1. This priuate spirit what it is . 2. the persons in whome it is . 3. the effects which it worketh . 4. the punishment which ensues vpon it . Therefore he describes , that spirit to be the same , with this priuate spirit , that is , The spirit of their owne hart , which the Prophets follow . v. 3.2 . This spirit is in the men-prophets , The Prophets of Israell , that prophecy . v. 2. & in the women-prophets , The daughters of the people , which prophecy v. 17. both of them being the people of God , and chosen Israelites . 3. The effects of it , are . 1. Blindnes , they see nothing ▪ v. 3. 2. Vanity , They see vaine thinges . 3. Lyes , They diuine lyes , saying , Our Lord sayth , whereas I haue not spoken , v. 7. & chap. 22.28 . saying : Peace , and there is not peace , v. 10. 4. Fraud , which , as Foxes in the desertes , v. 4. tyed by the taile of malice , and seuered in the heades of doctrine , doe destroy the vinyards of Christ . Cant. 2. as dawbing of a wall , made by the dawbers of clay or morture , but without temper of chaffe or straw , v. 11. As cushions and pillowes , made by delicious women , and layd vnder mens heades to lull them in security , and catch their soules . In both which with faire exteriour shew , and hopefull promises they deceaue the people , feeding some with a security of future good , & terrifying others with danger of future euill , that they might kill the soules , that is , denounce that they shall be killed : who dye not , and viuificate the soules , that is , declare that they shall liue : which liue not , lying to the people that belieue lyes . v. 19.4 . The punishment it brings with it , is woe to the foolish Prophets , v. 3. woe to them that sow cushions , and make pillowes : I will destroy the wall , and accomplish my indignation in it : my hand shall be vpon the Prophets ; in the councell of my people , shall they not be ; and in the Scripture , of the house of Israell , they shall not be written ; neither shall they enter into the land of Israell . v. 9. They shall diuine no more , and I will deliuer my people out of their hands . v. 21.23 . Loe , heere is described the nature , the authour , the effect , and the punishment of this spirit . In all which , if we compare spirit with spirit , person with person , effect with effect , and punishment with punishement , we shall find the priuate spirit of the Protestants properly described , in this false spirit of the false Prophets . This false spirit of the false Prophets was a spirit of their owne , a spirit of their owne hart , that is , of their owne inuention , according to their fancy , because , as sayth the Prophet Hieremy : They did falsely prophecy to you in my name , and I sent them not , sayth our Lord. The priuate spirit of the Protestants , is a spirit of euery mans owne , and his owne hart , euery one hath his owne spirit , and that priuate , and singular to himselfe . Euery one sayth , his spirit is of the Lord , whereas our Lord hath not sent either them , or their spirit . These false Prophets were some men , some women , all Prophetes of Israell v. 1. Daughters of my people , v. 17. all reputed among the faythfull children of God , and yet false Prophetes , and false Prophetesses were they both . The Protestants , who chalenge this spirit , are all Prophets , that is , interpreters of the word of God : they are ( in their opinion ) all faithfull & elect children of God , all endued with this spirit , which is giuen to all , & common to al men & women , & by it euery one of them doth prophecy , and interprete Scripture . The fruits and effects of this spirit , were Blindenesse , Vanity , Lying and Deceit , by which they in hypocrisy made faire shew of piety : but within wanted temper of good morter , of true piety to daw be their wall ; and with flattery layd soft cushiōs of hopefull promisses vnder the elbowes of euery mans humour , to please their fancy , and all to catch soules , and deceaue Gods people . v. 10.18 . The Protestants spirit which vaunts so much of knowledge , verity , sincerity , and piety , what is it , but a trappe baited with so many faire baites , to catch so many soules ? Their Church , what is it , but a wall without temper , or morter of the true spirit , or word of God , to vphould it from falling and erring ? Their doctrine , what is it , but cushions , and pillowes of faire promises , of certainty of truth , and saluation , deceauing all who belieue it , Killing or denouncing damnation to them who dye not , and Viuificating , or assuring saluation to them who liue not ? Their Preachers or Prophetes , what are they , but as their blind , vaine , lying , and deceitfull spirit , by which they are guided ? that is , men most blind in errours of doctrine , most vaine in ostētation of truth , most lying in falsely accusing others , and most deceitfull in shifts & euasions , against manifest truth . Lastly as the punishment which fell vpon these Prophets , & their blind , lying , vaine , & deceitfull spirit , was not only a woe and a curse of Gods indignation against them , a diuision , & dissolution of the wall among themselues : but also a separation of them from the councell of Gods people , from the house of Israel , and from entrance into the land of promise ; so the punishment which fals vpon this spirit , & them who are deluded by it , is no lesse then a dissolution of all vnity in Religion ; a separation from the Church of God , from the body of Christ , from the society of Saints ; from the vnity of whose spirit , by the singularity of this their priuate spirit , as they are separated in this life , so by incurring the woe & indignation of God against them , as well as the former Prophets , they must needs be diuided from him , and his kingdome in the next life . And this is the fruit of this spirit in all Prophets , and professours of it : and the end , and punishment of them who are conducted by it . Out of which it followes . 1. That as this priuate spirit , was in the old Prophets ; so it is in these new Preachers , & interpreters of the word of God : as in them it inuented new and false prophecies , and predictions ; so in these it deuiseth new and false errours in fayth , and vaine , and deceitfull expositions of scripture . 2. That as in them , it was a spirit of blindenesse , lyes , vanity , and deceit , by which many were lead into dangerous and damnable errours , & fell into great and grieuous punishments ; so in these Preachers and interpreters , it hath the same effect , and brings vpon them the like punishments . 3. That as then , before Christ , this spirit possessed , and seduced both men , and women , prophets & prophetesses ; so now , & euer since Christ , it hath done the same , as S. Hierome notes of the tymes before him : Simon Magus had his Helene ; Nicolaus his troupes of women ; Marcion , his Minion , sent before him to Rome ; Montanus , his Prisca , & Priscilla ; Ptolomeus , his Flora ; Apelles , his Philomela ; Arius , the Emperours sister ; Donatus , his rich Sucilla ; Elpidus , his Agape ; and Priscilianus , his Galla ; all prophetesses of like spirit with the prophets , all hands and helpers to diuulge their heresies . So in these our later dayes , euery new maister had his mistris , and euery Preacher his partner , all participant of the same spirit ; thus had Dulcinus his Margaret ; Luther his Catherine ; Caluin his Ideletta Buraea ; Beza his Candida ; and euery new Doctour , as Carolostadius , Oecolampadius , Bucerus , Martyr , Sanctius ( and who not ? ) euery one his sister , and yoake-fellow in the spirit of the Lord. Out of all which I conclude & argue thus . That spirit cannot be a fit interpreter of scripture , nor a sufficient iudge of controuersyes , which is a spirit of euery one 's owne hart , a spirit blind , lying , vaine , and deceitfull , a spirit seducing men , & women , a spirit which separates from the society of the faythfull , and infers a woe and indignation of God. But such is the priuate spirit which in the old Law seduced false Prophets , and in the new Law deludeth the false Preachers , as holy Scripture of the former , & experience of the later doe both testify : Therfore this priuate spirit cannot be a sufficient iudge of Fayth , & a fit interpreter of holy Scripture . Out of Iob 32. declaring in Eliu , his friends spirit , the manner of proceeding of this priuate spirit . SECT . V. A Fifth proofe is out of Iob 32. The patience of Iob hauing beene tryed in the losse of his cattle , his family , his children , and in the vexation of his body , & vpbraiding by his wife , was after all this assaulted by his friends . These ( sayth the Glosse ) represent the fashions of Heretikes , who vnder the shew of aduising , vse the arte of seducing ; for which , Iob before he began to dispute with them , sayd , he would shew them to be Fabricatores mendacij , & cultores falsorum dogmatum . 13.4 . Framers of lies , and worshipers of false opinions . Of these , three of them being conuinced by the speaches of Iob , and made silent therby , the fourth , Eliu the Busite , a young man of a more feruent spirit , the sonne of Ram , that is , Excelsus , or Proud , a new maister , riseth vp angry against Iob , because he sayd , he was iust before God , v. 2. & against his friends , because they could not answere Iob with reason v. 3.5 . And beginning first to commend himselfe , and his silence : Because I was young , I was affraid to speake ; and then to condemne his elders , saying , That the ouldest are not the wisest , neither doe the old wen vnderstand iudgment ; And lastly ( to shew of what race he is come , and to our purpose ) he sayes : As I see the spirit is in man , and the inspiration of the omnipotent doth giue vnderstanding , v. 8. and I also will answere my part , and will shew my knowledge ; for I am full of wordes , and the spirit of my belly streyneth me : behould my belly is as new wine , without a vent , which breaketh new vessels . I will speake , and take breath a little ; I will open my lippes , and will answere . v. 18.19.20 . God hath made me , as he hath made thee , chap. 33. v. 6. Heare yee wise mē my words , and yee learned harken to me . cap. 34. v. 2. Heere is a description of a new spirit , and of one full of it , a Caluinist , or Puritan in the highest degree , he hath the spirit of God , the inspiration of the Omnipotent , vnderstanding aboue others ; his belly is full of the spirit , and words , seeking vent , as wine out of a new vessell ; he will speake , talke , and answere that , which his Auncestours and wise men could not ; he hath reason , which they had not ; he is inspired by the Omnipotent , which they are not ; he is inspired that Iob is vniust , because he sayd , He was iust before God. v. 2. that the ancients are destitute of wisedome and iudgment , of the spirit of God , of all truth & verity ; that he hath the spirit of truth , and that all truth is to be learned of him ; this spirit , in a hoat Puritan , sayth , as Sedechias the false Prophet ( who had a lying spirit in his mouth ) sayd to Micheas the true Prophet : Hath the spirit of the Lord left me , and hath it spoken to thee ? No sure ; for the spirit of God hath forsaken the whole Church ( to which yet it was promised by Christ ) so that it hath erred , is fallen , and become Antichristian ; but the spirit is certainly in me , it infallibly teaches me truth , tels me the meaning of scripture , assures , me of saluation ; it cannot depart from me , and my mouth , & the mouth of my seed for euer : thus sayth the Caluinist out of his spirit , as this Eliu , and Sedechias sayd out of theirs . Out of which I argue thus , That spirit which is the same with the spirit of these false Prophets , who were so seduced and armed by it , against the Saintes and Prophets of God , cannot be a fit spirit to interprete Scripture , iudge of doctrin and to make a sole ground of beliefe : but such is the priuate spirit now , and alwayes hath beene in all former Heretiks and false Prophets , therefore it cannot be a fit iudge of controuersies , and an infallible interpreter of Scriptures . Out of Tit. 3.10 . shewing the spirit of an Hereticke . SECT . VI. THE sixth proofe is taken out of an admonition giuen by S. Paul , against Heretikes , Tit. 3.10 . in these wordes : A man that is an Heretike , after the first , and second admonition auoid , knowing that he , that is such an one , is subuerted , & sinneth , being condemned by his owne iudgement . In which wordes we are to note . First , who is an Heretike , that is to be auoided . 2. The reason why he is to be auoided . First therfore as Heresy is a voluntary errour in the vnderstanding against some verity of Fayth , obstinatly defended by him who hath once belieued ; so an Heretike is he , who hauing once professed the Christian fayth , doth erre in some article of it , & doth with obstinacy defend his errour : for which is requisite . 1. That he haue receaued the Christian fayth , at least in Baptisme by professing it . 2. That he erre in some point , or points of fayth , not in al , for then he is an Apostata . 3. That he be obstinate in his opinion , or errour , of which sort , are not they who according to S. Augustine , defend their opinions , though false and peruerse , with no stubborne stomack , or obstinate hart , especially if it be such as themselues by bold presumption broached not , but receaued it of their deceaued parents : and doe seeke the truth warily and carefully , being ready to be reformed , if they find it such . These are not to be reputed among obstinate Heretikes . But those according to the same S. Augustine : Who in the Church of God haue any crazed and peruerse opinion , if being admonished to be of a sound and right opinion , they resist obstinatly , and will not amend their pestiferous opinions , but persist in the defence of them , are thereby become Heretikes , going forth out of the Church , and are counted for enemies that exercise vs. Againe : He i● an Heretike , that when the doctrine of the Catholike fayth is made plaine and manifest to him , had rather resist it , and chose that which himselfe held . According to whome , and the Doctours of our tyme , he is sayd to be obstinate in heresy , who willing , & witting doth maintaine any thing against the Catholike Church , or which is all one , who knowes and reflectes that his opinion is contrary to the sentence of the Catholike Church , and yet neglecting the authority of the Church , which proposeth it for true , doth persist in his opinion . And this is an Heretike , who after admonition being growne thus obstinate , is to be auoyded , reiected , and refuted . Secondly , the reason why we are to auoyd an Heretike is , because that such an one sinneth in obstinacy , and is subuerted without hope of amendement , being condemned by his owne iudgement , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , that is , sayth Tertullian : Because he chose that , for which he is damned , by willfully adherring to his owne opinion , and conceit , where the origen of his sinne , subuersion and condemnation is his prefering his owne selfe-seeming conceit , before the determination of the whole Church of God ; which is proper to those who rely vpon their owne spirit , and prefer it before all , euen the whole Church of God. Out of which it followes first , that the origen of all heresies , is a mans owne proper and priuate conceit , which he preferring before the iudgement of the whole Church , chooseth to follow his owne opinion , rather then the determination of the Church . And out of this I argue thus . All who rely and build vpon their owne priuate spirit , iudgement , and opinion , for matters of fayth & religion , preferring it before the sentence of the whole Church and Pastours of it , are Heretikes sinnefull , subuerted , & to be auoided , according to S. Paul : but such are all those , who make their priuate spirit the rule , and iudge of their fayth , religion , and exposition of Scripture , as is apparent , because neglecting the direction of the spirit of God , which directs his whole Church , they preferre before it their own priuate spirit , which directs themselues ; therefore are iustly condemned , and so to be auoided as Heretikes . Out of diuers places of Scripture , condemning the relying vpon our owne iudgement . SECT . VII . THE last proofe which I will vse , is out of these places of Scripture , which as in generall they exhort vs not to be wise in our owne conceit , nor to trust in our owne opinion & iudgement : so in particuler they do condemne this relying of euery man vpon his priuate spirit , which is nothing els , but his conceit and opinion . First the Wiseman sayth : (a) Leane not vpon thy owne prudence , be not wise in thy owne conceit . (b) The way of a foole is right in his owne eyes , but he that is wise , heareth counsaile . (c) There is a way that seemeth to a man iust , but the later end thereof leades to death● . I say sayth : (d) VVoe to you that are wise in your owne eyes , and prudent before your selues . Moyses sayth : (e) You shall not doe there the thinges that we do heere this day , euery man that which seemeth good to himselfe . Of all which S. Paul giues a reason , and denounceth a punishment , because (f) hauing not glorified God , they are become vaine in their imaginations , and their foolish hart hath beene hardened ; for saying of themselues , that they be wise , they are become fooles . And (g) to them that are of contention , & obey not the truth wrath , and indignation . (h) In the flame of fire giuing reuenge to thē that know not God , and that obey not the Ghospell . Out of which places I argue thus : They who leane on their owne prudence , are wise in their owne conceit , are vpright in their owne eyes , are wise and prudent before themselues , doe that which seemes good to themselues , say , themselues are wise ; these become vaine , foolish , contentious , hard-harted , know not God , obey not truth , resist the Ghospell , and are cursed , according to holy Scripture . But such are all they who in mysteries of fayth , in matters of religion , and in expositions of Scripture forsake the direction of the spirit of God , promised and giuen to his Church , and rely and depend vpon their own spirit , or self seeming conceit , who by it choose their fayth , and vpon it ground their saluation , as all Protestants do who are guided by this priuate spirit : therefore in this miserable , and desperate case of ignorance , vanity , folly , obstinacy , and cursednes are all those who in their fayth , religion , and exposition of Scripture , are thus guided , directed , and instructed by their priuate spirit . And if these sayinges of Scripture be verified in affaires morall or domesticall , publique or politique , which are in the compasse of our naturall iudgement , & reason ( of which they are properly vnderstood ) and in which experience also teaches , that they who in any arte , science , or negotiation , most rely vpon their owne iudgement , and follow their owne wayes , do often commit the greatest errours , and fall into the deepest dangers ; wheras they , who are aduised by others , and goe the ordinary way , doe for the most part proceed more securely , and succeed more prosperously : Then much more is the verity of them confirmed in mysteries of fayth , which are aboue our capacity ; in verities of religion , which are not measured by reason ; and in explication of Scripture , which is a (a) booke sealed , and that (b) with seauen seales , which none in heauen or earth could open , or looke vpon , but the Lambe , (c) nor any spirit interprete it , but that which did make it . In all which euery mans proper iudgement must needes be weake , and euery ones priuate spirit doubtfull , whether it can attaine to the true and proper vnderstanding of them . All which is confirmed by the authority of that famous Doctour S. Augustine , who sayth : Quis mediocriter intelligens , non plané viderit , &c. VVho , though of meane capacity , doth not plainely see , that it is more profitable and secure , for the simple to obey the wise , then to liue according to ones owne direction : and if this course be safer in small matters , as in tilling of ground , marrying of wiues , education of children , and ordering of ones family : much more it is in religion ; for humane thinges are more easy to be knowne , and in diuine things there is more danger of sinne , and offence . And againe : No science or trade , though meane and easy , is learned without a Maister ; what therefore can be more audacious , and temerarious , then to seeke to vnderstand bookes of diuine mysteries , without Interpreters ? And againe : Men to vnderstand a Poet , do seeke for a maister , Asper , Cornutus , Donatus , and others : and darest thou without a guide , aduenture vpon the diuine bookes , which be full of diuine mysteries , as all confesse ? and darest thou giue thy iudgement , or interpretation of them ? And thus is this priuate spirit , defining of fayth , decyding of controuersies , and determining of religion , confuted by authority of holy Scripture , expresly confuting and condemning it , and the aforesayd function assigned to it . He who wil see more testimonies to proue the right Iudge of controuersies , and the infallible interpreter of Scripture , which are the authority of Gods holy Church , and the chiefe Pastours of it ; let him read Bellarmine , where he shall see the practise and testimony of antiquity , and the euidence of reason , all at large cited for the same . THE PRIVATE SPIRITS INTERPRETING OF HOLY SCRIPTVRE , AND Iudging of Mysteries , and Controuersies of Fayth , confuted by the testimony of holy Fathers . CHAP. III. WE haue confuted this pretended power , and authority of the priuate spirit , by the authority of Gods holy Word ; it remaines that we do the same by the testimony of ancient holy Fathers . For which we may note , that as S. Augustin alleadging the Fathers before him against the Pelagians , sayd : That he would not assume to himselfe to alleadge the sentences of all Fathers , nor yet all the sentences of them whome he alleadged ; but some sayings of some few , which yet are such as will cause our aduersaries to blush , and yield , if eyther feare of God , or shame of man , will ouercome so great an obstinacy in them . So we will not vndertake to alleadge either all the Fathers , or al the testimonies of those ▪ whom we alleadge , no more then we haue done al the Prophets or Apostles , or all the authorities of them whome we haue cyted ( which labour in both , we leaue to thē , who are more expert in both ; ) yet I hope we haue collected some , and those in euery age such , as being wel pondered , & seriously discussed may suffice to satisfy the Reader , that in their iudgement , this priuate spirit is an vnfit Interpreter of holy Scripture , and an vnable iudge to decide matters of Fayth . Secondly , we may note , that though none of the ancient Fathers did in particuler write of this subiect , nor yet on set purpose confute it : yet these sayinges and sentences of theirs sought , and picked out , as so many dispersed flowers of their seuerall gardens , and coupled togeather as into one nose-gay , may serue for a taste of their generall opinions , & iudgement in this matter , especially since their assertions were neuer contradicted , nor their persons euer censured by any for them . Thirdly , we may note , that those Fathers , who doe either attribute this prerogatiue of interpreting Scripture to the Church or Pastours of it ( as the most cyted by Bellarmine before quoted doe ) or derogate the same from all humane , and proper wit and iudgement ( as some of these heere cyted in their words do ) do both of them as much , as if in expresse tearmes they had done it , condemne this priuate spirit , and power of it , as incompetent for a Iudge of Fayth : 1. because they who interprete Scripture , and assigne the Fathers , Councells , or Church for approued and authorized Iudges in this case , must needs condemne those who forsake them , and oppose themselues and their iudgement against them : which all they doe , who rely vpon their priuate spirit , and prefer their iudgement of it , before the iudgement of the Church , and Fathers . 2. Because all who are guided by this priuate spirit , and rely vpon it , doe in effect rely vpon their owne iudgement , and opinion ; and so either erroneously mistaking themselues , or abusing the spirit , do insteed of the spirit of God , make their owne conceit , fancy , or imagination the iudge and vmpire of all . These being supposed we will descend to particulers , and cyte some of these Fathers and their testimonies in thei● seuerall ages . First therefore to begin● 〈◊〉 the first age of the Apostles , & to descend downe 〈◊〉 . S Clement (a) the scholer of S. Paul , and coetaneall with the Apostles , sayth : It is to be obserued , that when the law of God is read , it ought not to be read or vnderstood , according to the meaning of euery mans owne wit ; for there are many thinges in holy Scripture , which may be wrested to that meaning , which euery one volūtarily presumes to frame to himselfe : but this cannot be . Loe , the sense which euery ones wit and iudgement , which they call their spirit , presumes to frame , cannot be a true and infallible sense of Scripture . In the second age ; Irenaeus a Doctour and Martyr ( whō S. Hierome calles , Virum Apostolicum , an Apostolicall man ) speaking of the Heretiks of his tyme , sayth : Euery (b) one sayth , that his owne fiction , which he hath deuised of himselfe , is wisedome , & that he vndoubtedly , vnspottedly , and sincerely doth know the hiddē mysteries . These Heretikes made the inuention of their own braine , the vndoubted spirit of wisedome , to vnderstand the hidden mysteries of Fayth . Tertullian speaking of Heretikes who differ among themselues , sayth : Euery (c) one doth tune what he receaues , according to his owne liking ; in the same manner as he , who taught them , made it according to his owne liking . Againe , shewing that diuersity of doctrine brings corruption of scripture , he sayth : They (d) who are resolued to teach otherwise then the Church , must change the meanes of doctrine , that is scripture ; since , how came the heretikes to be strangers and enemies to the Apostles , but by the diuersity of doctrine which euery one , according to his owne liking , either made or receaued ? Againe : VVho (e) are rauenous wolues , but subtill senses and spirits , that lye close to molest the flocke of Christ ? VVho are false Prophets , but false Preachers ? VVho are false Apostles , but adulterous Ghospellers ? Againe : (f) He is to be counted an Heretike , who forsaking that which was first , doth choose to himselfe that which was not before . Againe : Heresy is called in Greek of Election , by which one chooseth to beginne , or follow it : therefore S. Paul sayd , that therefore an Heretike was damned , because he chose to himselfe that , for which he is damned . It is not lawfull for vs , to introduce any thing vpon our owne opiniō , nor to follow that which others introduced vpon their owne opinion . And (g) he calles Adams sin , an Heresy , because he chose it rather vpon his owne , then Gods election . Heere are deceitful spirits , euery one 's owne spirit , liking , will , purpose , resolution , opinion and election described to be that which makes men Heretikes , and strangers from God , rauenous Wolues , false Prophets , and adulterous Ghospellers , and damned Heretikes , and changes the sense of Scripture . Out of which the same Tertullian (h) affirmes , That heresy is a matter of humanae temerity , not diuine authority , which alwayes so amends the Ghospell , vntill it corrupt it . That all doctrine is true ( not which came from a priuate spirit , but ) which agrees with the Apostolicall mother , and originall Churches ; and that is without doubt to be held , which the Church receaued from the Apostles , the Apostles from Christ , Christ from God ; all other doctrine is preiudicated , as that which sauoureth against the verity of the Church of Christ. Againe : That (i) to deale with Heretikes by Scriptures , is but to turne ones stomacke , or breake his braine , to loose his speach by contending , & to rayse choler by hearing their blasphemy ; since what the most expert Scripturist can alleadge they will deny , and what he denies they will defend , eyther by denying Scripture , or by adding , or detracting from it . Valentinus , sayth he , receaued that which was most for his purpose , and formed the Scriptures to his owne opinions , but not his opinions to Scripture . And so , as S. Augustine saies : They (k) contend not for the true meaning of Scripture , but for their owne opinions , making that which is the opinion of their owne , to be the meaning of Scripture . In the third age , Clemens Alexand. in his learned bookes Stromatum , which he wrote ( according to Baron . ) anno 204. shewing not only that Heretikes alleadge Scripture , but also how they vse it , sayth : Though (l) they who follow heresies , presume to vse the propheticall Scriptures , yet they neither vse all of them , nor these they vse entirely , but choosing those sayings which are doubtfull , they draw them to their owne priuate opinions . This is one of the chiefest sleightes of this their priuate spirit , to wrest doubtfull sentences to their owne aduantage , & make that which is vncertaine in it selfe , certaine , and a point of Fayth . In the same age , S. Cyprian , that Doctor suauissimus , & Martyr beatissimus , as (m) S. August . calles him ; speaking of some whome the Diuell leades from one blindnes of the world , to another darkenesse of errour , sayth : They (n) call themselues Christians , and while they walke in darknes , they thinke they are in light , the Diuell flattering and deceauing them , who transfigures himselfe into an Angell of light , and subornes his owne Ministers , as Ministers of iustice , affirming night to be day , damnation to be saluation , and shadowing desperation vnder pretence of hope , & perfidiousnes vnder pretence of Faith , Antichrist vnder the name of Christ . Againe , shewing how heresies and schismes arise out of disobedience of the people , to one Pastour , and Iudge in place of Christ , he sayth : No (o) man should make any stirre against the colledge of Priests ; no man , after diuine iudgement , after the suffrage of the people , after the consent of fellow-Bishops , should make himselfe iudge , not now of the Bishop , but of God. No man should deuide the vnity of Christs Church by discord ; & being proud should by himselfe coyne and set abroad a new heresy . Againe : (p) The beginning and endeauour of Heretikes , and Schismatikes , is to please themselues , and to contemne their Superiour , with swelling pride ; they goe out of the Church , and set vp a new Altar , breake peace and vnity . Againe : In (q) doctrine as well diuine as philosophicall , it is neyther safe nor fit that persons vnlearned , and ignorant of that which belonges to those sciences , should venture to discusse that they know not , and to be maisters of what they are ignorant . In all which the effect of the priuate spirit is described to be ; to question & examine that which is determined by Bishops and Councels , to make it selfe iudge of all , to diuide the vnity of the Church , to broach new heresies , and in conceit and respect of it selfe , to contemne all superiority , to teach that they know not , and to be maisters of what they vnderstand not . In the fourth age , S. Ambrose a man so worthy , that S. Augustine (r) reuerenced him as his Father , who begot him in Christ ; so praysed him , that he not only , calles him happy , & the flower of latin writers , but all the Roman world ( sayth he ) with me admire him , his grace , constancy , labours , & perils , both in workes and wordes : Yea ( sayth he ) Pelagius the Heretike so extolled him , that he durst not reprehend him , & his exposition of Scripture , but acknowledged that in his bookes , aboue others did shine the brightnesse of the Roman fayth . This holy Saint and Doctour sayth : Those (s) are Heretikes , who by the wordes of the law , impugne the law ; for they set a proper sense vpon the wordes , that they may commend the wickednesse of their owne opinion , by the authority of the law . Againe : It (t) is a very dangerous thing , if after so many prophesies of the Prophets , after the testimonies of the Apostles , after the bloud of Martyrs , thou darest presume to discusse the ancient faith as new ; after so many guides , dost remaine in errour , and after the toiles of so many departed this life , darest contend in idle disputation : let vs reuerence therefore our owne Fayth in the glory of Martyrs . Heere is this priuate spirit , and two effects of it ; the one to interprete Scripture , according to euery mans owne liking ; the other to examine , and question againe that which hath beene iudged by the Pastours of Gods Church , and to censure them , and their iudgement ; both condemned by S. Ambrose . S. Hierome , one whome Prosper calles , Vitae (u) exemplum & mundi magistrum . An example of life , and the maister of the world ; whome S. Augustine (w) calles , One most learned & skillfull in three tongues , desires to conferre with him , to adhere to him , and to be instructed by him , sent his books to be censured of him , and commended others , as Orosius (x) who trauelled for that end from Spaine to Palestine to learn of him . And whome Damasus (y) the Pope , and many from all the partes of the world , consulted with , about obscure places of Scripture . This great lampe of Gods Church sayth : Heretikes (z) whatsoeuer they speake , they thinke it to be the word , or the law , neither doe they vouchsafe to know what the Apostles or Prophets thought : but doe apply certaine incongruous testimonies to their owne sense and meaning , as though it were not a great & most wicked manner of teaching , to depraue the sentences of Scripture , and to draw them contrary to their sense , vnto their owne will. A deuise proper to this spirit , to thinke all it sayes to be Scripture , and to wrest all scripture to its owne liking . Againe , he sayth : That (a) Heretikes , of the guifts of Nature , haue made to themselues Idols , not which they receaued of God , but which they made out of their owne braine . That (b) they haue turned the holy speaches , and senses of Scripture into Idols , which they haue framed out of their owne heart . That (c) hauing lost their iudgement , they worship the Idols which they haue framed of their owne hart , and are possessed with the spirit of spirituall fornication . That (d) of the sense of Scripture , they haue made Idols of diuers opinions , and abominations of offences . That (e) they vse the diuine wordes , and testimonies to their owne sense ; and do giue them to drinke to those whome they deceaue , and with whome they haue fornicated . That (e) in all questions , they follow not the authority of Scripture , but the opinion of human reason . That (g) they snatch certaine sentences out of Scripture , and sowing them togeather , doe set them to that matter to which they cannot agree ; and so do set them , as pillowes vnder euery ones elbow to delude them . Thus (h) doe ( sayth he ) all heresies deceaue , and draw to death , by faire promises , all sortes of ages , and sexes , giuing them not solid bread of Scripture , but broken , and cut peeces of crummes . Thus (i) did the Manichees , Gnostikes , & Marcion take testimonyes out of the pure fountaine of Scripture , but did not interpret them , as they were written , but cōuerted the simple meaning of Gods word , to signify that which themselues would haue . All (k) this they did , bragging of their receauing the spirit of God , which yet they had not ; but the spirit of the Diuell , by which they were carryed into diuers factions . Such an Angell and diabolicall spirit did possesse , and fill Philomela Apelles his virgin . Cōcerning which spirit he concludes , that , It (l) is called Heresy , ab 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , of election , by choosing euery one that doctrine , which seemes to him better , vnderstanding the Scripture otherwise , then the Holy Ghost meant it , by which he is an Heretike . The sūme of which gathered out of these dispersed places , is , that all Heretikes being deceaued by the spirit , by their owne opinion , and their owne selfe seeming conceit , do choose to themselues what sense of Scripture seemes most pleasing to them , and therby make it an Idoll of their owne inuention , by which they deceaue themselues , and delude others . Eusebius (m) confirmes the same , saying of the Seuerians , That , they interpret the sense of Scripture according to their owne liking . In the fifth age S. Augustine , one so highly commended both by ancient Fathers , and late Protestants , that ( as before is at full cyted ) they both count him , as a maister of all learning , as a fountaine incorrupted , a Doctour among the Interpreters of Scripture , as a Sunne among Planets , as the greatest of the Fathers , the worthiest Deuine that euer Gods Church had . This great Doctour , and Saint sayth : Heresies (n) haue no other origen then this , that euery Heretike prefers his owne opinion , drawne from his owne proper spirit , before the commō opinion of the Church . Againe : Nothing (o) makes them Heretiks but this , that misvnderstanding the Scriptures , they obstinatly defend their owne opinions . The (p) holy Scripture is dangerous to these who will wrest it to their owne peruerse hart , who whē they ought to liue according to the will of God , they liue according to their owne will ; and they will haue that to be the meaning of Scripture , which is their owne , when that which is the Scriptures , ought to be theirs . Againe : (ç) Thy truth , O Lord , is neyther myne , nor this mans ▪ or that mans , but all mens whom thou callest publickly to the communiō of it , and whereby thou dost terribly admonish vs , that we seeke not to haue truth priuate , least we be depriued of it ; for whosoeuer doth challenge to himselfe that which thou dost propose to be enioyed by all , and will make that proper to himselfe which is common to all , that man is driuen from the common to his owne proper , that is , from truth to falsehood . Wherupō he reprehends (q) the Pelagians , because they vnderstood the Scripturs according to their own priuate sense : the Donatists , because (r) eyther by too much louing their owne opinion , or enuying their betters , they went so farre vpon their diabolicall presumption , as sacrilegiously to separate holy communion , and bring in schisme or heresy : and the Manichies ; You (s) see that your worke is to take away all authority from Scripture , and make euery mans mind and conceit , authour of what is to be belieued , or not to be belieued in holy Scripture , that is , that you will not subiect your selues to Scripture , but will make Scripture subiect to your selues . Thus doth S. Augustine condemne this spirit , for that it doth prefer it selfe , and owne opinion , before the commō iudgement of the Church , doth falsely interprete Scripture , doth draw the meaning of Scripture to its owne wil , yea the will of God to the same . And he condemnes the Pelagians , Donatists , and Manichies , for that by it they expounded Scripture , and deuided themselues from the communion of holy Church . With S. Augustine , agrees Cyrill of Alexandria : (t) Heretikes should do well if they would seeke the true sense of Scripture , and not turne all according to their owne will. And with them both , Vincentius Lyrinensis : If (u) any would seems a Prophet or Maister , that is , maister of spirituall thinges , let him chiefly desire vnity , and equality , that is , that he do not prefer his owne opinion before others , nor doe departe from the generall opinions of all men . Because (w) all doe not take the holy Scripture in one and the same sense ; some do interprete one way , others another way , the same sentences , so that as many senses are made , as there be men . Therefore it is very necessary by reason of many turninges and windinges of errours , that the line of Catholicall , and Apostolicall interpretation be directed , according to the rule of the Ecclesiasticall and Catholike sense . Heere is aduise giuen not to wrest all to our owne liking , and spirit , but to keep vnity , and direct the interpretation of Scripture according to the rule of Catholike sense . After all these , Venerable (x) Beda , the honour of our Nation , in the eight age , sayth : As the Prophets did write , deliuer , and speake , not their owne wordes , but the wordes of God ; so also the Reader of them , must not vse his owne proper interpretation , least he decline from the sense of the truth . Therfore we affirme , that no man presume to expound Scriptures , according to his owne pleasure . What more plaine ? I will adde to these the testimonyes of Luther and Caluin vttered in confutation of others , but against themselues . Luther ( x ) (z) speaking against Swenkfeldius , sayth : It must not trouble vs , that some do glorify of the spirit , and little esteeme the Scriptures . But , sayth Luther , good friend , the spirit goes this way , & that way : I also was in spirit , and haue seene spirits , if I may glory of my owne , perhaps more , then they shall see in a yeare ; and my spirit doth shew it selfe in something , where theirs is yet in a corner . Note , that the Swenkfeldians , and the Caluinists agree , in that both of them rely on the Spirit , and make it the ground of their Fayth : they differ , in that the former refuse scripture , and rely only on the spirit ; these later admit scripture , but , both for canon and sense of it , subiect it to their spirit : so that the spirit in the one reiects scripture , in the other it censures , and Lordes it ouer scripture . Whether is worse , let any be iudge . Caluin also speaking of the same Swenkfeldians , sayth : If that spirit was good , it would be the same with the spirit of the Apostles , and ancient faythfull people , but their spirit would not be iudg without scripture : so say we ; If Caluins , or the Caluinist spirit were true , it would be the same with the spirit of the ancient Church and Fathers . Also against the Vbiquitarians , he sayth : Satan (a) hath bewitched their mindes with horrible witchery &c. And , Satan by turbulent spirits doth endeauour &c. Mans (b) hart hath so many secret places of vanity , is subiect to so many holes of lyes , is couered with so much fraudulent hypocrisie , that it often deceaues it selfe . Againe : Many (c) false Doctours belye , or counterfeite the title of the spirit ; many mad men start vp , who rashely make ostentation , that they are endued with the spirit of God. They (d) are fooles who amazed at the honourable title of the spirit , dare not enquire after the matter it selfe . Many (e) braggo of the spirit , yet speake in their owne priuate name , goe out in their owne name , vtter out of their owne sense . Thus do these Patrons , & practisers of this priuate spirit wound themselues , in thus stabbing the same in their aduersaries . For what they affirme against them , is verified against themselues . But what can these Spiritualists ( as we may call them ) say to all these testimonies of Fathers ? Or rather what shall we say to them about the same ? I conceaue nothing can be sayd better , then that which S. Augustine in the like case of originall sinne , sayth against the like Heretikes the Pelagians : for hauing cyted most of the Doctours before his tyme , both of the Greeke and Latin Church , as Irenaeus , Athanasius , Cyrill , Nazianzen , Chrysostome , Basil , Olympius , Reticius , & fourteene more , whose workes are not now extant , as Eulogius , Ioannes Ammonianus , Porphyrius , Fidus , Zozimus , Zoboenus , Nimphidius , Cromatius , Iouinus , Eleutherius , Clematius all greeke Doctours ; and Cyprian , Hilary , Ambrose , Innocentius , yea Hierome , of his owne tyme , all Doctours of the Latin Church , and all to proue originall sinne , and necessity of grace , against Iulian the Pelagian , he speaketh of the Fathers in this manner : These (f) Fathers I haue cyted , & no more , least it should be too tedious to read them , yet such , as are not so light , that you may scorne to weigh thē , yea so great , that you may groane vnder the burthen of them . These (g) are they , whose so great consent ought to moue you , and who are not a conspiracy , as you call them , of ill tongued men , but who flourished in the Catholike Church , are sound in doctrine , and armed with spirituall weapons ; who fought stoutly against heretickes , and haue passed ouer their labours and slept in the bosome of peace : VVho (h) hauing liued holily , and ouercome the errours of their tyme , and departed gloriously out of this world , before you came into it . These (i) though they were not then present , when this Controuersie began , and is now on foot , & so could not by word of mouth giue a definitiue sentence ; yet when they wrote , and sayd these thinges , they were then such as had not any either friendship , or falling out with you or vs. They were angry , neither at you , nor vs , had compassion of neither . What they found in the Church , they kept ; what they learned , they teached ; what they receaued from their Fathers , they deliuered to their children . You and we did not plead before these Iudges , and yet they decyded our cause ; neither you nor we were knowne to them , and yet we do produce their verdict for vs , against you ; we did not about this matter contend with you , and yet they pronounce vs victors . That (k) which they belieue we belieue ; what they teach , we teach ; what they preach , we preach ; yield to them and yield to vs ; consent with them , and consent with vs : if you will not by them be a friend to vs , yet be not for vs an enemy to them , which yet you must be , if you remaine in this errour , therfore leaue it , and leane to them . Can (l) Pelagius , and Celestius ( Luther and Caluin ) so farre preuaile with you , that for them you dare forsake so many , and so great ancient Doctours , and defenders of the Catholike fayth ouer all the world ? Hath tyme made such a confusion of great and small matters ? Is darkenes so become light , and light darkenes , that Pelagius , Celestius , Iulianus &c. do see ; and Hilary , Gregory , Nazianzen , Ambrose &c. are blind ? VVere (m) it not better to yield to them , who are better and stronger , and to maister your owne presumption , then to insist vpon your owne animosity and conceit , which you desire should preuaile , because it is your owne ? VVere (n) it not better to yield to these Christian Doctours , or rather to Christ in them , and to restore your selfe to them , from whome you are departed ? How (o) gratefull would these be to you , if you did belieue the Catholike fayth : and how terrible must they needes be against you , when you oppugne the same Catholike Fayth , which they sucked from the teat , which they eate with their meate , which for milke and meate they gaue to little ones , and great ones , which they plainely and stoutly defended against their enemies , euen you not then borne ? By such planters , waterers , builders , Pastours , nurses , the Holy Church increased , therefore stood amazed at the prophane termes of your nouelty , and as the head of a serpent , abhorred , troad vnder foot , bruised and kickt away your new opinions , which did lurke , and crawle to deceaue the virginity of the Catholike Church , and corrupt the chastity of it , which it hath in Christ , as did the Serpent seduce Eue. The Fayth of these is to be defended against you , as is the Ghospell , against wicked and professed enemies of Christ ; euen that Catholike and Christian fayth , which as it was first deliuered in Scriptures , so by these Fathers it hath beene hitherto kept and defended , and shall by Gods grace , euer be kept and defended . Thus S. Augustine against the Pelagians , & their new doctrine , for the Fathers ; and thus we against the Protestantes , and their priuate spirit , and new doctrine , for the same . And this may suffice for the testimonies of Fathers . THE PRIVATE SPIRITS INTERPRETATION OF HOLY SCRIPTVRE , Deciding of Controuersies , and iudging of matters of Fayth ; Confuted by Reasons drawne from the difficulty of discerning of Spirits . CHAP. IIII. Of the diuersity of Spirits . SECT . I. IN the former Chapters we haue confuted the Protestāt priuate spirit by authorityes of holy Scripture , and by testimonies of ancient Fathers : it remaines that we doe the like by euidence of reason ; and in this Chapter , by reasons drawne frō the difficulty of discerning of spirits , of which if the priuate spirit be not able to discerne and iudge which be good or bad , which true or false ; much lesse is it able to discerne & iudge the motions and effects of them , that is , which Scripture , & the sense of it , is true or false , which fayth and doctrine is good or bad . For the better vnderstanding of which difficulty of discerning of Spirits , we may note first how many sortes of varieties and distinctions of spirits there be . 1. According to the nature and property of spirits , S. Gregory distinguishes them thus . Some are without mixture of body , some with mixture . Spirits without mixture , are either increate , as God the Father a spirit , God the Sonne a spirit , God the Holy Ghost a spirit , all one God , al one spirit , good without quality , great without quantity , euery where without place , alwayes without tyme , doing all without action , mouing al without motion , containing all , and contained in nothing , and present in all by his essence , power , and presence , and yet aboue all : or els create , which are either happy in glory as the Angells in heauen , which are as (a) administring spirits for vs ; or els damned in hell , as the Diuels , who as (b) roaring Lyons seeke to deuoure vs : both which doe differ either in specie or kind , or at the least in degrees of power and greatnes , some being in the highest , some in the midle , some in the lowest Hierarchy , euery Hierarchy hauing his order , and euery order his particuler Angels , and Diuels belonging to it . Spirits mixt with bodies & flesh , are either such as are mixed with flesh , and dye with it , as the sensuall soule of birds and beastes ; or such as are mixt with flesh , but dye not with it , as the reasonable soule of man , which is a meane betweene Angells to whome he is inferiour , and beastes to whome he is superiour , communicating with the one in the immortality of soule , with the other in mortality of flesh . 2. According to their estate , and condition ; these spirits are some good , as God , Angels & Saints ; others bad , as Diuels & men wicked , aliue , or damned in hell ; others indifferēt , as the natural spirit of man , and sensuall of beastes : some are blessed in heauen , as Angells and Saints , others damned in hell , as Diuels , and the damned soules ; others in the way , and out of danger , as the soules in purgatory ; or in the way and in danger , as the soules of men liuing ; some are meere intellectuall , as God and Angells ; others more sensuall , as beasts ; others rationable mixed of both , as man ; some alwayes without bodyes , as Angels and Diuels ; others alwayes with bodyes , as beastes and birdes ; others sometymes with body , and sometymes without , as the soule of man liuing , or dead , before and after resurrection . 3. According to the effect and operation , S. Bernard distinguishes six kindes of spirits . 1. Diuine , of God , (c) the spirit is God. 2. Angelicall , of Angels , (d) he hath made spirits his Angells , which alwayes worke good . 3. Diabolical , of the Diuell , (e) he sent immissions by euill Angells . 4. Carnall , of the flesh , (e) puffed vp by the sense of the flesh . 5. Worldly of the world , (f) you haue not receaued the spirit of this world , which worke alwayes bad . 6. Humane , of man , (h) the spirit of man which is in man , which of all is indifferent , and when it is assisted with grace is good , when stayned with sinne is bad . (g) To which may be added the spirit of truth , and of lying , the spirit of wisedome , and giddines , and the spirit of the knowledge of truth , and errour , of which is spoken before cap. 2. Of which spirits for our purpose , these chiefly are to be noted , that is , the spirit of God , of Angells , of Diuells , and the spirit of the soule of man dead , in heauen , in hell , or in purgatory ; and of man liuing , according to the dictamen , either of our naturall reason , or of the light of diuine fayth and grace . And thus much of the variety and differences of the nature of spirits , which are to be discerned . Secondly , we may note , that these seuerall sortes of spirits haue seuerall sortes of operations in man , and do seuerall wayes manifest and shew themselues in him and to him ; for as in the naturall life of man , besides the powers vegitatiue and sensitiue , by which he liues and moues , God and Nature hath prouided certaine more subtile spirits , that is , the vitall spirits in the hart , which passing through the arteries , do help to vitall operation , as nutrition , and augmentation ; and sensible spirits in the braine , which passing through the veines do assist to the sense of feeling , touching , and the rest : so also in the spirituall life of a Christian man , besides the permanent guifts of the Holy Ghost , and habits of faith , hope , and charity , infused in Baptisme , and Pennance , togeather with grace ; God doth communicate also certaine extraordinary helpes and guifts to the soule , which as certaine beames of his diuine light , and sparkles of his celestiall loue , assist and enable it to a higher knowledge of God , and good thinges , and to a more perfect practise of vertue and perfection : and these are diuine illuminations , inspirations , or visitations and visions , which are of two sortes , the one meere spirituall , and internall ; the other sensible and externall . The first sort of spirituall motions , arise immediatly from foure heads . 1. From God , who ( illuminating the Vnderstanding with a heauenly light , clearely to discerne what is true or false , what good or bad ; inflaming the will with an ardent desire to loue sincerely him and his goodnes , and to doe his holy will and commandement ; and enabling the rest of the faculties with an inuincible fortitude , to performe couragiously what is to his greater honour & glory ) doth , when , or how he pleases , and by meanes , and in tyme best fitting , as prayer , meditation , reading , or such spirituall practises , speake , instruct , and direct the soule by speciall illustrations , inspirations , and confortations . 2. From the good Angell , who by good cogitations and motions , exciting the dulnesse and drowsinesse , conforting the infirmity and weaknes of the soule ; and conseruing the same from danger of enemies , is alwayes ready to assist vs in prayers , and good workes , and to defend vs from all occasions , and temptations . 3. Frō the Spirit of grace , which with the light of fayth , & flame of charity inhabiting in vs , doth continually knock at the dore of our heart , and in our sleep awakes vs , in our sicknesse strengthens vs , in our distraction so recollects vs , that with alacrity we may proceed in all exercises of piety , and with facility ouercome all assaults of our enemy . 4. Frō the Dictamen of reason , and light of nature , which pricked forward by the synderesis of a good conscience , doth as a Preacher continually exhort and moue to a prosecution of good , and an auersion from euill ; and as a Maister doth still direct and instruct vs how to behaue our selues in our combat against the law of sinne , and the Angell of Sathan , which make continuall opposition against it ; all which , as a vigilant watchman , doe still watch at the superiour part of the soule , to wit , the Memory , Will , and Vnderstanding , eyther by an infused light , or by species , formed and framed in the phantasie , and do inwardly knocke , awake , admonish and incite our soule , to the knowledge of truth , & the operation of God. The other sort of Spirits is sensible , and visible , by visions , and apparitions ; and these are sometymes Imaginary , presenting inwardly to the phantasie , and imagination , a shew and apparition either of wordes spoken , or of persons appearing in their own person , or in some other like to thē , or in some figure representing them : others sometymes are Visible and corporall , seene , heard , or felt in some corporall body , formed and framed of the ayre , and assumed & moued by a spirit which in them speakes , walkes , and exercises sensible actions , as though it were a true and liuing person , both which kindes happened often to the Patriarches and Prophets of old , and to many in these later tymes ; sometims waking , sometymes in their sleep , and are both of them , either by way of Oracles ( as S. Augustine calles them ) when some graue person appeares and fortells what is to be done , as did Onias , and Hieremy , to Iudas Machab●us ; or by way of visions , when thinges haue the euent indeed , as they appeare in shew , as happened to S. Peter , who (a) saw an Angell , whē indeed the Angell did free him out of prison ; or by way of Dreames , when apparitions of mysteries are shadowed in figures , not vnderstood in sense and signification , such as was Pharao his Eares of corne , and Nabuchodonoz●r his Statua . All which , whether interiour or exteriour , though they be properly diuine , of God , and good Angels ( of which is frequent mention , and examples both in the old and new Testament ) yet because they are sometymes diabolicall , of the Diuell , who by suggestions and illusions doth imitate them ; and sometymes naturall dispositions or diseases of body , whose affections and imaginations are not much vnlike to them : And because of the later sortes , that is , visions and apparitions , of which is the greatest difficultie , examples in scripture , and ancient histories ( for I will forbeare latter tymes ) are many and authenticall , how sometymes God , sometymes Angells , sometymes Diuells , sometymes Soules out of Limbo , Paradise , Purgatory , Hell , & Heauen haue appeared : therefore I will first produce some examples of euery one , and then shew , what difficulty there is in discerning one of them frō another . 1. For apparitions of God , we haue examples , how he appeared to (a) Adam in Paradise , to (b) Noe in the Arke , to (c) Abraham in Haram , in Mābre , in the mountaine , to (d) Moyses in the fiery bush , in Aegipt , in the mountaine , and in the Tabernacle , and to (e) Agar , in the desert , to (f) Samuel in the Temple , and to all the Prophets , and many of the Patriarches ; in all which it is sayd , Our Lord spake , our Lord appeared , which he did in the shape , now of a man , as to Adam ; now of three men , to Abrahā ; now of a Wrestlar ; to Iacob ; now of a fire , to Moyses ; now of a Cherubim to (g) Ezechiel ; now of (h) a Thorne , to Isaias ; now of (i) an old man in a white Vestement to Daniel , ( though it be more probable , that not God in person , but an Angel representing God , did appeare . ) 2. For apparitions of Angells , we haue exāples expresly of them , how they appeared to (k) Lot , to forewarne him of the destruction of Sodome ; to (l) Iacob , to encourage him against Esau ; to the (m) Israelites , to direct them through the desert ; to (*) Gedeon , to make him Captaine against Madian ; to (n) Tobie ; to accompany him in his iourney ; to (o) Elias , to send him to reprehend Ochozias ; to (p) Dauid , punishing and killing the people ; to (q) Zachary , and to the Virgin Mary , reuealing secret mysteries to thē . Which apparitions , if we respect the place , were made either in the garden , as to our (r) Sauiour ; or in the fieldes as to (s) Iacob ; or in the desert , as to (*) Agar ; or in the house , as to (t) Gedeon ; or in the fornace , as to the three (u) Childrē ; or in the Temple , as to (w) Zachary ; or in prison , as to (x) Peter ; or at the Sepulcher , as to Mary Magdalene . If the state of persons , they were made to our Sauiour himselfe ; to Christians , as S. Peter ; to Iewes , as Ioseph and the Patriarches ; to Gentils , as Heliodorus , and the three Kinges ; to men , as Zachary ; to Women , as the Maries ; to old persons , as Abraham , and Sara ; to young , as Daniel ; to good persons , as Lot ; and bad , as the Sodomites . Also some before Christ , some after Christ , some in Christs tyme , some in the law of Nature , some of grace : so that in all tymes , and at all places , & to all sorts of persons these reuelations of Angells haue bin made . Thirdly , for apparitions of Diuells , ( wherof some are sayd to be Pythonici , or South-sayers , some Paredrij , or Familiars , some Catabolici , or possessors and tormentors of men , some Oniropompi , or dreame makers ) we read of their visible apparitions ( to omit their imaginary ) how they haue appeared often , and in many shapes ; sometymes of Beastes , as of a serpent to (a) Euah , and Leonard of (b) Corbie ; of a Dogge following them , to (c) Simon Magus , and Cornelius Agrippa ; of a Horse , to an Earle of (d) Mascon ; of a Cocke , to (e) S. Pachomius ; of a Crow , to (f) S. Romualdus ; of a Foxe , to (g) S. Hilarion ; of a Dragon , to (h) S. Margaret , and to Gonzales of Castile ; of Lions , Buls , Beares , and Wolues to (i) S. Anthony ; of a Dog , to (k) S. Dunstan ; & ordinarily of a Cat to Witches , and of Wolues (l) to terrify , & of Bees , and flyes to trouble & distract (m) men . Sometimes of men or women , ( and to (n) Apelles like a beautifull woman ) as to our Sauiour Christ , like a Venerable mā (o) in his tentation ; to Saul ( in some opinion ) as (p) Samuel , by the Pythonise ; to (q) S. Martin , as a King with a Diademe ; to a Boy ( in S. Gregory ) as a blacke (r) More ; to S. Robert the Abbot , as a frisled (s) Ruffin ; to S. Maximus , as a Mariner with a ship ; to Euagrius , as a Cleargy man ; to Macarius , as a reaper of corne , and an Apothecary ; to Nathanael , as a Carrier whiping his (*) horse . In all which he alwayes appeared in some deformity , as either in a body blacke , pale , durty , stinking , or terrible , or with a face foule , blacke , and deformed , or with a nose hooked , a mouth wide , eyes hollow , or fiery , feet club or clouen , toes like clawes , or some great deformity of body , as is (t) obserued , God not otherwise permitting it , the better to discouer him ; sometymes in the night to men , eyther waking , as to (u) Luther , when he taught him to abrogate the Masse ; or sleeping , as to (w) Zuinglius , in what colour he knew not , when he taught him to expound the wordes of the Sacrament , figuratiuely ; and to (x) Oecolampadius , when he kild him in his bed : sometymes in the day , as to (y) Carolostadius , when in the pulpit he stood by him ; sometymes he appeared in shape of Saints , Angels , and Christ , and God himselfe , of which see examples afterwardes ; sometymes of Incubi , and Succubi , lying with men , or women , and by art getting of children ; sometyms of Centaur's , Scylla's , Chimera's , Gorgons , Cerberus , Harpyes , and other monsters terrifying mē ; sometymes seeking adoration , to be worshipped as Gods , which they require of Witches ; sometimes shewing a seruiceable obedience , as when to Magiciās they eyther at certaine wordes of Magicke , or at certaine constellations of starres , or vpon certaine dayes of the weeke , as Friday at night , they ryse vp , appeare , and disclose thinges secret , as treasures ; or foretell thinges to come , as the euents of batels , or the like . All which in what shape they please , & to whō God permits , the Diuells performe . Fourthly , for apparitions of soules out of Limbo , before Christ , we haue the examples of Moyses from Limbo , and Elias from Paradise , to our Sauiour , and the three Apostles (z) in the transfiguration ; of Onias the high Priest , and Hieremy (a) the Prophet to Iudas Machabeus ▪ and the people ; of Samuel the Prophet (b) ( according to (*) S. Augustine , and others ) to Saul the King , telling him , sayth Ecclesiasticus , the end of his life , and exalting his voice out of the earth in prophesy , or as it is in the Greeke , after he had slept , or was dead , prophesying . Fifthly , for apparitions of soules out of Purgatory , we haue ancient exampls ; of Paschasius a Deacon seene by Germanus ▪ Capuanus , in the Bath of Angulanus ; of Iustus freed by 30. Masses of his brother Copiosus ; of another helping a Priest at the Bathes , and helped out of Purgatory by his Masses , al three cyted by S. Gregory (c) the Great ; and of the sisters of (d) S. Malachias , and (e) S. Thomas of Aquine , both appearing & relating themselues freed by their Brothers masses . With many other of later tymes , too long to be set downe . Sixthly , for apparitions of the Damned in hell ( to omit the apparitions of Infidels , such as are related of Romulus to (f) Proclus , exhorting the Romās to worship the Gods ; of Homer , to Appion the (g) Grāmarian , telling him his owne Country , and friends ; of Achilles , to Apolonius ; of Seuerus to (h) Heliogabalus ; of Castor , & Pollux (i) in the Latine Warre ; of the Ghost at Athens related by Pliny , to be leane faced , long haired , and handes and feet (k) chained : To omit , I say these Infidels , we haue of Christians , the examples of Theodoret (l) the Arrian King , carryed betweene Iohn the Pope , and Symachus the Senatour ( both whome he had killed ) into Vulcans forge ; of Chilpericus (m) the wicked King of France , seen by Guntran the King , carried between three Bishops into a hoat caldron ; of a Bishop of (n) Ancona , seen by Elias an Hermit standing before Gods Tribunal , and caryed to hell ; of a Nunne (o) in S. Laurence Church cut in peeces before the altar ; of ( * ) Eubronius an Apostata , appearing to one , whome he had vsed cruelly , and carryed into hell-fire . And so many more too pittifull to be remembred . Seauenthly , for the apparitions of the soules in heauen , we haue the examples first of our Sauiour , to S. Paul in his way to Damascus (p) ; to S. Peter flying from Rome , and saying he went to Rome to be crucifyed againe (q) ; to Carpus Bishop of Crete (r) with multitudes of Angells , reprehending him for too seuerly punishing a lapsed Brother ; to Peter Bishop of Alexandria , complayning that Arrius had torne his coate (s) ; to S. Martin in the halfe coate which the day before he had giuen , for his sake , to one naked : next of our Blessed Lady ( I recount only those which are ancient ) to (t) S. Iames in Spaine at Saragossa , for erecting there a Chapell , now in great veneration ; to (u) S. Gregory Thaumaturgus in a glorious shape ; to (w) Musa a Virgin , in S. Gregory his dialogues , for the amendement of her life ; to (x) S. Iohn Damascen , restoring his hand cut off for defending Images ; to (y) S. Cyrill , admonishing him to be friends with S. Chrysostome ; to (z) Narses , in all his battailes against Totila ; to (a) Cyriacus an Abbot , for the burning of Nestorius writings ; to the (b) Architect of Constantine the Great , building a Church ; to the Sonne of a (c) Iew cast into an heat Ouen , by his Father , for receauing the Blessed Sacrament among Christians ; to Pope Liberius , and (d) Patricius , about building S. Maria ad Niues ; to (e) Rupertus an Abbot , giuing him a quicke wit , and vnderstanding of Scripture . All which are of our B. Lady . Of other , Saints we haue the apparitions of (f) S. Peter and Paul to Constantine , and curing his leprosie ; of (g) S. Philip , & S. Iohn Euangelist to Gregory Thaumaturgus , shewing a worke of piety to be done ; of the (h) Apostles at Constantinople , in thāks of Iustinian building them a Church ; of (i) S. Iames to Charles the Great , helping him to recouer Galicia from the Sarazens , and to Rainerus , and Alphonsus Kinges of Spaine , against the Moores ; also of (k) Saint Agnes , to Constantine the Great his daughter ; Geruasius (l) and Protasius , to S. Ambrose ; Potamiena (m) Origens scholler to the torturer , foreshewing his martyrdome ; (n) Felix Nolanus , defēding his Citty Nola ; (o) Thoodore Martyr , admonishing Euxouius to auoid meates sacrificed to Idols ; (p) Cosmas & Damian , curing Iustinian sore sicke ; (q) Peter and Paul terrifying Attila from sacking of Rome ; to omit what is related in this kind by S. Basill of Mamant , by S. Nazianzen of his brother Caesarius , by S. Hierome of Paula , by S. Paulinus of S. Ambrose , by Euodius of S. Steuen , by Prudentius of Fructuosus and his company , by Lucianus of Gamaliel , by Palladius of Colluthus , by Theodoret of S. Iohn Baptist , by S. Athanasius of S. Ammon . And who desires to see more , may read in Delrio , the like apparitions in euery age of christ , how some appeared , as our Sauiour , and Valeria in the first . How Potamiena , and others in the second . How our Blessed Lady , S. Iohn , S. Cyprian , and diuers African Martyrs in the third . How our B. Sauiour , our B. Lady , S. Peter , P. Paul , S. Agnes , S. Agatha , Spiridion , Artemius , Caesarius , Triphillus , two Bishops and others , in the fourth age . How S. Iohn Baptist , S. Martin , S. Geruase and Protase , S. Ambrose , S. Eulalia , S. Fructuosus , S. Felix in the fifth age . How our B. Lady , S. Iohn , S. Peter , and Paul , S. Bartholomaeus , S. Steuen , S. Eutichius , S. Tetricus , S. Iohn Silentiarius , in the sixth age . How our B. Lady , S. Iuuenall , S. Eleutherius , S. Leocadia , in the seauenth age ; and so downeward in all ages vntill this present tyme , or neere . All which being not only ancient for the tyme , as being within the first 600. years , but also made credible , by the sanctity of them who did appeare , by the grant of them to whome they did appeare , and by the authority of them who belieued , and related that they did thus appeare ; may in prudence and piety be credited , and cannot without leuity and temerity , be condemned or reiected . And thus much of the variety of spirits , and the certainty of their apparitions . It remaynes that we shew the difficulty in discerning these spirits , and the apparitions of them , and by the same conuince the insufficiency & inhability of Priuate Spirit to discerne good spirits from bad , reuelations frō illusions , and true fayth & doctrine , from false & erroneous . Of the difficulty to discerne these Spirits . SECT . II. THE first difficulty of discerning thes spirits ariseth vpō the difficulties which are in particular about these seuerall sortes of spirits , & the apparitions visible made by them . And first of the spirit of God , great difficulty hath anciently beene made , whether God did appeare in his owne proper body , or in one assumed , that is , whether he had such a body , or such partes of a body as appeared in shew , and are by scripture attributed to him ; that is , whether he had head , eyes hands , feet , and the rest of the partes of a body , or not ? Also as yet great difficulty is made , supposing ( as it is most certaine ) that he is a meere spirit , whether God himselfe did appeare in assumed bodies , or some Angell in his place , representing his person : & if himselfe should haue appeared , whether the Father , the Sonne , or the holy Ghost ? And if the holy Ghost , whether he assumed that flesh of a Doue , or of Tongues ( for example ) in which he appeared ? In the like manner as the second person assumed the nature of man , and of this Doue thus assumed , whether it may be adored and prayed vnto , as God , and the holy Ghost , which assumes it ? Of the spirits of Angels , great difficulties are made of their nature , whether it be corporall or meere spirituall : if spiritual , whether all be of the same , or of diuers species , or kinds , whether all be incorruptible by nature or by grace , whether made before , or with the world ; how they can know God , and things on earth ; how they know things to come or contingent ; and how they can vnderstand one another ; how , & by what vertue they moue themselues , and other things ; how they are distinguished in orders and Hierarchies ; how they haue and performe the custody of men . Concerning their assumed bodies , it is doubtfull & difficult whether they informe them , or assist only in them ; how , and of what matter they doe make , and frame them ; how , and what operation or motion they exercise in them ; whether any vitall or externall operations , as of eating or drinking ; or any sensual , or external , as of hearing , or seeing ; or any internall , as of passion or affection ; or any intellectual , as of discoursing and discussing , of sinning and meriting ; how they illuminate one another , the higher the lower ; how they present visions , and cogitations to men ; whether to their phantasie only , & by the phantasie to the soule , or imediately to the superiour part of the soule also . Of the Diuels , great difficulties be made , how they fell frō grace , by what sinne , of pride or enuy , into what place ; of hell only , or the aire & earth also ; in what number , more then the blessed , or fewer ; how they are tormented with materiall fire ; and how they carry their tormēts with them , while they torment others , and yet the fire torments not those others in whome they are ; how they enter , possesse , and torment men , in what number , by whole legions ; in what manner , with such instruments of tortures ; how they frame and assume bodies , whether of dead men , of beastes , and the like , or made of the ayre ; how they can abuse women , and beget children ; how they cause thunders , lightenings , & stormes ; how they tempt men , oppose the Angels , hate God , and all good ; how they are deuided into orders , & Hierarchies ; how a subordination , and confusion stands among them , with many such like ? Of the soules departed are many difficulties ; as whether in person Samuel himselfe , or a Diuell for him , appeared before Saul ; whether Moyses from Limbo , and Elias from Paradise before Christ ; whether their apparitions be internall only to the phantasie , and imagination , or externall corporally to the senses also ? If internal , whether the soules can , or Angels for them do , produce these phantasies ? If externall , whether their apparitions be personal , in their own presence , or representable by Angells for them ? If personall in their owne presence , whether the soules in Purgatory ōly , or those in heauen , and hell also , do in presence personally appeare ? If all of them , whether present in their own bodies in which they liued , or in others by them assumed ? If in assumed and made bodies , whether made by themselues , or by Angels for them ? If in bodyes made by Angells , whether they can informe and giue life , or els inhabite , & giue only motion to them ? If only motion , what quantity they can moue , greater then their owne body was , or lesse ? to what distance , further off or neerer ? By what vertue , naturall , or superadded they can moue them ? What operation they can exercise in them , whether naturall of working & mouing ; or vitall also of eating and sleeping ; or sensual also of delectation , or auersion , and which is most intellectuall , of reasoning & speaking ? If they vse reason , whether they know what is done on earth , how they know it , by reuelation from God , or by relation from Angells , or by Species or formes of their owne retayned of old , or acquired anew ? Whether they vnderstand where they are , and what they doe ? Whether they in Purgatory can by prayer and satisfaction be freed ? Whether they who are in heauen , or hell , can increase their ioyes , or paines ? With many more such like . Of all which , if one should aske any ones priuate spirit , or the diuers spirits of diuers ones , and seeke for a certaine resolution of them ; what answere would their spirit affoard ? Or what agreement would be among them , or their answers , or what certainty can be builded vpon any of them ? Surely such is the difficulty in all these , and many more doubts , that let any one spirit of one man , or many spirits of many men resolue them , the hearer shall find such opposition in their resolution , and so great difficulty in discerning which of these is a good spirit , which a bad ; which vision is imaginary , which corporall ; which effect is of God , which of the Diuell ; which is to be belieued and followed , which to be forsaken and abhorred , that he shall find himselfe more doubtfull then before , and deeper plunged in difficultyes , the further he proceeds in inquiries . And thus much of the first reason of difficulty , to discerne the difference of spirits . Of the difficulty , and vncertainty of the rules of discerning Spirits . SECT . III. THE second difficulty of discerning these spirits ariseth vpon the variety and multiplicity of the rules & meanes , which on the one side men , holy , learned & experienced , after much practise of deuotion , great labour of study , & long experience of tyme , either by illumination frō God , or by diligence , industry , or by subtility of obseruation haue made , obserued , and in large Treatises left to posterity , for the discerning of these Spirits . And which , on the other side are so vncertaine and doubtfull , that what by the infirmity of man to discerne them , what by subtilty of the euill spirit to deceaue in them , few can with any certainty , and infallibility rely , and depend vpon them . First therefore for my owne , and the Readers instruction , I will set downe the rules , out of diuers and large treatises collected , which vsually are giuen for discerning these spirits ; and next , shew the grounds and reasons of the vncertainty and fallibility of them ; and out of both , inferre the insufficiency , and inability of euery mans priuate spirit , to make an infallible estimate and iudgment of them , and therby to rely , for himselfe and his estate of saluation , vpon this his spirit , and the opinion of it . SVBDIV. I. Rules to discerne which are good spirits , and which are bad . AND first for the meanes , signes , or rules of discerning these spirits good , or bad , though there be no great difficulty , or vncertainty in discerning spirits which are euill , as the spirit of the Diuell , and his instruments the flesh , and the world ; for that the good spirit of God , of an Angell , or of grace cannot suggest those wicked cogitations , nor performe those vnlawfull actions , which the bad spirits both can and do ; as for example , they can neither lye , deceaue , blaspheme , nor persuade heresy , infidelity , periury , and sacrilege ; nor commit vncleanesse , and lewdnesse , by way of Incubi , or Succubi ; nor obey Inchaunters , Magicians , Witches , for wicked vses ; nor worke and leaue in good soules , doubts , troubles , and despaire of God , & saluation ; neither vse they to appeare in horrible and deformed shapes of beasts and monsters : All which , and such like are proper to the bad spirit , & sufficient rules & signes to discerne him by these fruits and effects . Yet because the bad spirit , the Diuell , both can , and doth often counterfeit , and in shew performe the same exteriour actions , which the good spirit doth ( as by examples shall afterward be shewed ) therefore I will propose only the Rules , and signes which are giuen for the discerning of the good spirits ( of which is the most difficulty and vncertainty ) and of their motions , illuminations , and inspirations . First therfore for the discerning of the good spirits , vnder which title I include all sortes of motions which come imediatly either from God , or from Angels , or from grace ( the difference of which doth not much import , since they are all good , and of God mediatly , or immediatly ) the rules , and signes to discerne them , are taken , some from the obiect , & matter which is proposed , some from the manner , & circūstances how it is proposed , some from the fruits , and effects which it worketh . The rules , and markes drawne from the obiect & matter , are . First that the good spirit inspires , & moues only to verity , and true faith , not to falsity and heresy , nor to any thing which is contrary to the grounds & rules of true faith . And so whasoeuer is contrary to faith , and the grounds of it , as scripture , tradition , Church , Councels , & consent of Fathers , is not from the good , but the bad spirit . Secondly , that it moues only to matter of piety , and sanctity , and to nothing contrary to good life and manners , or to the law of God , or naturall reason . Therefore what is sinne , & impiety by commission , or omission , against reason or grace , is from the bad , not the good spirit . Whereuppon it follws that , as the Prophet saith , the spirit of God is Corne , and Fire , & a Hammer , because it nourisheth , & strengthneth with verity & vertue , as Food ; it enlightneth & enflameth with illuminations and inflāmations , as Fire ; and beateth & mollifieth , with contrition & mortification , as a Hammer : but the spirit of Sathan is as a Dreame , and Chaffe , because it followes things apparent , not true ; & things vaine and not solide ; things that tend to ill , not to good . Wherfore when it proposes things either true , or good , it is neither to be belieued in the one , nor followed in the other , because in the end and application it doth deceaue , and brings danger in both . Thirdly , that it moues sometimes to these verities and vertues , as to know , loue , and follow God in generall , only leauing the application , and particulers to the direction of others , for the matter , the manner , the tyme , the place , or the like , as it did S. Paul to be a Christian , leauing him to Ananias to be instructed what he should belieue and do . And Iephta to make a vow , according to the Prophet Isay , who yet by his owne spirit , as faith S. Ambrose , choosing the particuler , erred and did amisse . Fourthly , that when it moues in particuler to extraordinary works , as for example , of pennance & fasting , as it did S. Antony , Simeon Stelites , & S. Katherine of Siena to fast many weekes , and monthes ; or of obedience , as it did Abraham to offer in sacrifice his sonne ; and others to walke on the water , set vpon Lyons , or the like ; or of martyrdome , as it did some Virgins , and Martyrs to cast themselues into the water or fire , to preuent tentation , or confound the Tyrants ; al which it did for the fuller triall of the persons , the greater honour of God , or more edification of others : When I say , God moues or inspires to these extraordinary workes , then ordinarily he doth it with that sense of certainty , that he leaues no doubt of it in the soule ; with that vehemency of motion , that the soule presently proceeds to execution ; with that subtility of attention , that in the operation , the soule can hardly attend to any thing els , but that which is good , and of God. The rules and markes drawne from the manner of proceeding of the spirit , are . First , That when the spirit doth worke any good motion immediately in the superiour part of the soule ( as in the Vnderstanding , reuelations and illuminations of truth ; In the wil , inspirations , and inflammations , and ardent desires of good ; In the Memory , attention , and adhesion to God in the same manner as it doth the habits of faith , hope , charity , and the rest ) all , without any mediatiō , or ministery of any species in the outward senses , or of phantasies in the interiour imaginatiō ( to which the power of the bad spirit is limited ; ) that then it is the spirit of God , which somtimes enters in , knocking at the dore of the soule by holy vocations and admonitions to call it from sinne to grace , frō vice to vertue : somtimes hauing got entrance doth worke & labour in the soule , either inlightening the darkenesse , or inflaming the coldnesse , or moistening the drynesse , or righting the crookednesse , or mollifying the hardenesse , or awaking the drowsinesse , or curing the sicknesse , & reuiuing the senslesnes , which it finds in the same . Somtims it proceeds so far , as now to infuse a copious light of knowledge , reuealing secret senses of scripture , deep mysteries of faith , high points of contemplation ; now to instill a pleasant dew of consolations , and comforts in spituall practise , and of content and sweetnes , in enduring afflictions ; now to perfume it with a fragrant odour , either of the incense of Deuotion , or of the myrrhe of Mortification , or of the sweet sent of all heroicall vertues and perfections , wherewith the soule is rapt , as it were , out of the sense of bodily feeling , vp to a glimpse , to a taste , to a sweetnes , to an vnion with God , so farre , that it is no more where it liues but where it loues , now wholy absorpt , rauished , and inflamed , and transformed into God , and God into it . All which are a signe of the spirit of God , Secondly , that the spirit of God thus setled in the soule , doth as it were with two eyes looke out , & abroad , into all things . That is , with the one of pure intention , which seeks , not our owne honour , profit , pleasure , and content in any thing but God , and his honour , glory , and praise in all our words , actions , visitations , consolations , or desolations : The other of discretion , which proceeds in measure , not going further in any practise , then our ability will extend : In weight , valewing things of necessity , before things voluntary , of iustice before charity , of obligation before supererogation : In degree , first mouing , then walking , then running , and lastly flying , and that by step to step , from the botome to the top , imbracing first the feet , next the knees , then the hands , & so to the face , and presence of our Sauiour : In order , contenting our selues with wayes ordinary , plaine , facill , vsuall and commodious to our selues & others , not aspiring to works & effects extraordinary high , prodigious , miraculous , beyond reach of our reason , and without benefit to any . And in all , it perseuers , & proceeds with vigilancy , and diligence , without stop , interruption , or retiring in the course of vertue and perfection . The rules , and signes drawne from the effects and operations of this Spirit , are : That the spirit of God , for the most part , hath , and doth cause such a spirituall sauour , and taste in the soule where it is , that as a man is knowne by his voice and visage , as hony is discerned by the taste & sweetnes : So the motions , illustrations , and the voice , and speach of God are discerned , and knowne by a certaine proper , diuine , and spirituall taste and sweetnes , which , men accustomed to them , and practised in them , can by a supernaturall instinct of grace ( as a child doth his mother , by a naturall instinct of nature ) better discerne in thēselues , then expresse to others ; and fullier satisfy and content themselues with them , then giue any reason of them ; saying with the Prophet (1) Dauid , that they taste , and see , that our Lord is sweet ; & with the Apostle , that they (2) aboūd in knowledge , and all vnderstanding approuing the better things ; & yet they know not with the Euangelist , (3) whence it cometh or whither it goeth , why it is caused , or how long it remaines , but only they tast and feele it , and so rest satisfied in it . Thirdly , that the spirit of God doth worke in the heart a true and solid humility , whose acts and effects are , 1. To feare , refuse , or at the least vnwillingly accept these extraordinary visitations being offered , preferring the ignominy of mount Caluary , before the glory of mount Thabor . 2. To conceale , and hide , not relate and speake of these gifts being receaued : but discouering them only in confession for counsell , and that lesse willingly then sinnes . 3. To desire , to be contēned in matters not only honorable of the world , but spiritual , as to be reputed wicked by persons not wicked but good , so long as no scandall is thereby likely to ensue . 4. To wonder that so worthy guifts should be in so vnworthy a person , & that God should bestow so much good vpon one so bad . 5. To feele rather a shame and confusion for the deformity of sinne , then a ioy & contēt in the dignity of the gift . 6. Not to desire these great and extraordinary visitations , but more ordinary acts of loue , purity , and humility . 7. Not to esteeme of ones selfe better for them , but to account others more holy without them . 8. Not to presume vpon any security or fauour for hauing them , but rather to feare greater obligation , vnworthinesse , and ingratitude for not well vsing them . Fourthly , that the spirit of God doth worke a perfect obedience : first of the will , against selfe loue ; secondly of the vnderstanding , against selfe conceit ; both of them , first to the will of God , to runne the way of his commandements ; secondly , to the will of man , that is superiour vnder God , to be ruled by him . Thus did the holy Hermites accept it as a signe of Gods spirit in Simeon Stelites , when being commanded to come to them , and giue an account of his austere life , he presently obeyed , and prepared to descend from his rocke to them . Fifthly , that the spirit of God doth worke vpon this resignation , a true mortification . First exteriour of the body , to tame the pride of the flesh . Next , and chiefly , interiour of the mind , to asswage the rage of passion and affection ; & both for that end to attaine to purity , not only of mind , but also of body , because visions and apparitions ( much more motions and inspirations ) though they come , saith one , in the likenesse of Saints , of our Lady , or of Christ , are alwayes suspitious , if they bring impurity of sensuall motions . Sixthly , that the good spirit of God doth bring with it peace , and tranquillity , ioy and gladnesse , comfort and consolation of the mind , expelling feare , bridling passions , supressing affections , and subiecting all manner of perturbations , to reason and grace . And though it cause some terrour , desolation or perturbation , yet it is at the first entrance when it begins , and that in sinners , in whom it finds resistance , whom yet in the end it leaues in comfort and consolation . And though it be short , and for the most , not of long continuance , yet it is not only frequent , often coming and often going , and alwayes leauing a good relish after it ; but also effectual , in euery one according to his state , as in an incipient in the purgatiue way , rooting out vices ; in a proficient in the illuminatiue way , planting of vertues : in a perfect man , in the perfect way , exercising perfection of action and contemplation . And these and such like be the rules and signes they giue to discerne good spirits . SVBDIV. 2. Difference betweene good and bad Spirits . THE same holy men the better to distinguish these spirits giue also certaine distinctiue signes , by which comparing the effects of the good and bad spirits togeather , the difference betweene them may the better be discerned . And first for exteriour visions , apparitions , & shapes or shewes of good and bad spirits , they assigne differēce . First in forme , that good spirits appeare alwayes in the shape of man , and that comely and beautifull ; the bad spirit in the shape often of beasts , and monsters , and these vgly and deformed . 2. In matter , that the good spirit persuads alwayes to verity & vertue : but the bad spirit alwayes to falshood and wickednes , eyther in the beginning or end . 3. In workes , that the good do help and assist vs in doubts or infirmityes : the bad do reuenge and punish our defects or iniquities . 4. In place , that the good appeare in places holy , in which piety is practised : the bad in places prophane , where wickednes is cōmitted . 5. In tyme , that good appeare ordinarily in the light , as Angels of light : but the bad in darkenesse , as Angels of darknesse . 6. For persons , that the good appeare to good men , to encourage them in goodnesse : the bad , to bad men , to draw them to more badnesse . 7. For holy thinges , that good do affect and desire : but the bad do fly & abhorre thinges holy and consecrated , as the presence of the Blessed Sacrament , of Reliques , Agnus deies , holy-Water , the signe of the Crosse , the name of Iesus , the inuocation of Saints , with many other ; of which , examples are copious , and certaine in diuers good Authours . Secondly , for the internall motions of the good and bad spirit , they assigne these kindes of differences : That the good spirit obserues an order , and conueniency of age and state in persons ; of tymes and seasons in affaires ; communicating wisedome , grace , and guifts agreable . 1. To the state of persons , Religious or secular . 2. To the dispositions of yeares , for those which are young or old . 3. To the conueniences of tymes , ioyful or sorrowfull ; reducing by degrees and meanes , in order and season , all sortes of persons from great sinne , to great perfection . The bad spirit obserues no such order , but confusedly , and vpon the sodaine seemes to eleuate to high thoughts , & wonderous actions , which are nether ordinary nor profitable for the presēt , & makes shew to exalt on the suddaine , from the deepest of sin , to the highest step of perfection , thereby to exalt them to pride and selfe-conceit , and to feed them with nouelty and curiosity . That the good spirit desires nothing in particuler for it selfe , and owne profit , or delight , nothing with importunity and impatience , but all with resignation to the will of God , so farre as it may be to his honour and glory : The bad spirit desires much for its owne will & pleasure , & all with importune , and vnseasonable vehemency , and perturbatiō . That the good spirit moues to inward humility , & contempt of ones selfe , and the more it increaseth in vertue , the meaner conceit it workes of ones selfe , and the better of others : The bad spirit moues to outward humility in exteriour thinges , that it may seeme humble and lowly , but workes an inward conceit of ones selfe , and willfullnesse in all actions and proceedinges . That the good spirit causes one to confide much in God , and distrust much in ones selfe : The bad spirit causes one to esteeme highly of his owne conceit , to presume much vpon ones owne force , and litle to feare his owne state & danger . That the good spirit is willing to suffer much for Gods cause , and the more it suffers , the more it is contented : The bad spirit murmurs , and repines , and is impatient at al crosses and afflictions , and is disquieted and vexed against those , by whome they are any way caused or procured . That the good spirit is mercifull and compassionate , shewing pitty and mercy , where it may shew iustice & seuerity : The bad spirit is seuere , fierce , cruel , and reuengefull , euen vpon those who do subiect , and humble themselues . That the good spirit shews a respect and reuerence , euen to the Saints & seruants of God , for the honour it bears to God ; and also to their Reliques , and Images , for the respect it beares to them : The bad neglects both , and refuses to giue any respect , or honour to either . That the good proposes the yoke of Christ as easy , & the grace of God as sufficient , and superaboundant to keep his Commandements , thereby to enable men to performāce thereof : The bad , proposes the performance of Gods commandements as impossible , and Gods mercy as facill before sinne is committed , thereby to allure to sinne ; & his iustice as rigide and terrible after sinne be committed , thereby to draw into desperation . That the good spirit , if it worke any miracles , illuminate with any reuelations , or reueale any secrets of the hart , or euents to come , doth do all peaceably , without any extraordinary motions of sobbing , sighing , exulting , or grieuing ; without ostentation of any such guift , or grace ; moderatly , without any vehemency of desire of them , or conceit of ones selfe , or contempt of others for them ; compassionatly , without aggrauating of offences receaued , or benefits exhibited ; and humbly , with submission to the iudgment of superiour authority , and with conformity to their censure , and correction . The bad doth all contrary ; it proceedes in perturbation without peace ; in vehemency without discretion ; in exagerations without measure ; & in obstinacy without relenting in any thing from that which it once conceaues . That the good spirit vses those wayes and spirituall meanes , which God hath for that present age , tyme , and place accommodated , as most fit for the spirituall good of soules then liuing . Therefore as in former ages he prescribed the instinct of naturall reason in the law of Nature , the vse of ceremonies in the law of Moyses , and either strange guift of miracles , and languages , or ardent desires of martyrdome , or rigide austerity of pennance in the primitiue ages of the law of Grace : so now in these ages , not communicating so frequently the guift of miracles , nor affoarding so vsually the benefit of martytdome , nor exacting so seuerely the former austerity of pennāce , it moueth vs to a more zealous performance of these deuotions , which in this tyme the Diuell more violently oppugnes , to wit , frequentation of Sacraments , vse of meditation , duties of obedience , veneration of Saints , visitation of Reliques , and holy places , and the like . The bad spirit peruerts all this order , it affects nouelty , it seekes curiosity , it followes after rarities , it ayms at singularity , it lookes for prodigiosities , and contents it selfe with nothing , but straines to extrauagancy , it seemes to know all , striues to do all , seekes to go beyond all , and flyes in his owne conceit , aboue all both measure , reason , & discretion . That the good spirit keepes in all , a tranquility of the mind , with a conformity in all thinges to the will of God , whether it be the rooting out of vices , the planting of vertues , the exercise of mortification , and deuotion , all conioyned with a pure iniention of not seeking ones owne , but Gods honour ; and with a discreet moderation , in being neither too credulous , in belieuing all , nor too obdurate , in belieuing nothing , but with aduice , and temper , to examin all , and not rashly to receaue , or reiect any . The bad spirit runs in all , the contrary race ; in some thinges it is troubled and disquieted with feares and scruples ; in others loose , & dissolute without care , or conscience ; at sometymes feruent and headlong in deuotion beyond measure ; at others , stupide and dull , without sense , or feeling ; in some practises of small importance , violent , vehement , and impatient without reason ; in others of moment , negligent , carelesse and heedlesse without any esteeme or regard ; in purposes of good , wauering , and inconstant ; in iudgment of others , credulous , and temerarious . All which ( omitting much which might be sayd more ) may suffice to discerne the multiplicity of signes of good spirits , and the difference of them from bad . It remaynes to shew , that neither these rules to discerne good spirits from bad , nor the difference betweene good spirits and bad , are so certaine , nor the applying them to euery particuler euent so easy , that the spirit of euery priuate man , can of it selfe proceed in it , and securely rest himselfe vpon it . SVBDIV. 3. The difficulty to iudge of these rules and differences of Spirits . NOtwithstanding therefore that these rules & signes of a good spirit , and these differences from a bad , be by spirituall men , well and truly thus assigned ; and notwithstāding , that it be true , that they serue for good , and morall directions , to discerne those spirits , and that any man may proceed probably in his iudgment vpon them : yet that they neither are in themselues so certaine and infallible , nor yet are for so certaine assigned , that euery man may infallibly rely , and rest vpon them without any further directour , but that these , both may , and often do faile in many particuler euents , and that many are deceaued in the vse and application of them , is by these reasons , heere briefly , and by examples afterwardes more at large produced , euidently proued . First , because such is the excellency both in nature and operation of these spirits , especially Angells , and Diuels aboue the nature and capacity of man ; and such is the weaknes and obscurity of mans vnderstanding , in these sensuall organs of our corporall frailty ; and such is the inconstancy and vncertainty of euery priuate spirit in euery particuler person , that admit these rules and differences were certaine ; yet neither is the vnderstanding of euery man so intelligent that he knowes them , nor his spirit so quicke-sighted that it can discerne them , nor his art and cunning so skillfull , that he can alwayes vpon euery occasion duly and infallibly apply them : but that necessarily vpon ignorance , errour , or partiality , and affection , in many cases he may , and must needes faile in them . For as all sciences , Law and Phisicke , Mathematicke and Musicke , Logicke and Rhetoricke , with the like ; and all arts and trades of nauigation , negotiation , military , or manufactory , & the rest , haue their principles & documents , and these some of them demonstratiue and certaine , which yet few or none can out of their owne wit & industry , without both a maister to teach , & tyme to learne , apply and vse certainly in the practise of particulers : so in this science of discerning of spirits ( which yet is so much more difficult then the former , by how much the spirits are more subtil , the operations more like , the rules more vncertayne , and the danger of erring more great ) a simple , and vnlearned man may , yea often many most learned , and intelligent Doctours ( witnesse , for example , Origen , Tertullian and all learned Heretikes ancient and moderne ) haue been grosly deluded , and dangerously deceaued , while insteed of the spirit of God , of truth , and of light , they haue followed the spirit of Sathan , errour , and darkenesse , and by it haue beene conducted , not only themselues , but also millions by their examples , into the pit of perdition and damnation . For as the Apostles being troubled with the storme of the sea , when they saw our Sauiour walking vpon the water , did thinke he was a Ghost : so there be some , who either vpon perturbation , pusillanimity , scrupulosity , tentation , or malice , do imagine euery motion of God in themselues , and euery vision , reuelation , or extraordinary worke or miracle in others , to be either mere fancies , & imaginatiōs of man , or else Ghosts and illusions of Sathan . Others there be , who on the contrary vpon too much leuity , & credulity of disposition , or vpon too much weaknesse , and infirmity of the braine , or vpon too much pride and presumption of thēselues , do conceaue euery idle imagination of their owne spirit , and euery false suggestion of the spirit of Sathan to be a vision , inspiration , or illumination of Christ , in which being perswaded that euill is good , and good euill , that darknesse is light , and light darknesse , that bitter is sweet , & sweet bitter , they do sometimes belieue , and adore a Ghost insteed of Christ ; other while neglect & contemne Christ as a Ghost ; somtimes do belieue and preach errours and falshood , as though they were truth ; otherwhile condemne truth , and diuine verity , as though it were Idolatry and superstition ; somtimes do imbrace vices & sinnes , as vertues ; otherwhile censure workes of zeale , charity , and humility , as acts of passion , basenesse and hypocrisy ; somtimes do giue credit to their fancies , and imaginations of their owne , or Sathans spirit , as if they were the spirit of God ; otherwhile reiect the inspirations , illuminations , & vocations of God , as illusions of Sathan . And thus , while they walke in two extremes , both a like perilous , that is , to neglect Christ as a Ghost , and to follow a Ghost as Christ , to refuse that which is of God , as if it were of the diuel , & to follow that which is of the Diuel , as if it were of God ; they belieue falshood , and condemne truth ; they imbrace painted & shadowed vices , and contemne solid and true vertue ; and so follow Away which seemes to them iust , but the later end thereof leads to death ; and are themselues those wicked , VVho are so secure , as though they had the workes of iust men . And this is the first reason , drawne from the infirmity of man , why these rules cannot be to vs certaine and infallible . The second reason is , because such is the craft , and subtilty of Sathan the wicked spirit , that as he can transfigure , and shew himselfe in the glory of an Angell , so can he transforme his actions into the actions of an Angell , and do the same which the Angels do . Therfore whatsoeuer exteriour actions either of charity , humility , or piety , deuotion , mortification , or other vertue , a good man by the inspiration of God doth ; a bad man by the instigation of Sathan , can doe the like . In which , though a difference will appeare in the intention , and the end ( both which in the good are good , and in the bad are bad , ) yet in the exteriour action , the Diuell can so cunningly carry himselfe , and so craftily couer his intention , that a quicke eye shall hardly of a long tyme discerne him . In this manner hath he carryed himselfe in all or most Hereticks , ancient and moderne , couering himselfe vnder the veile of the honour of God , zeale of soules , verity of doctrine , sanctity of life , word of God , and the like ; of all which in many of them he made a faire shew , and thereby deceaued many . Wherfore S. Paul foretels , (a) That many should come in later tymes , who shall giue eare to spirits of errours , and doctrines of Diuells . And S. Chrysostome did affirme : (b) That all heresyes , and all opinions of Heretikes , are from the Diuell . And S. Polycarpe did call (c) Marcion , the first-borne of the Diuell . Thus doth (d) Ioannes Cassianus auouch , that himselfe was an eare-witnesse , hearing the Diuel confesse , that he was the authour of the heresy of Arius , and Eumonius . Thus doth (e) Clemens Romanus , & (f) Iustinus Martyr , liuing in their tyme , witnesse of Simon Magus ; that by the Diuell , and magicke he was counted a God , and had his statua to Simon the great God ; and that Menander his scholler deceaued many of Antioch by Magicke . Thus (g) Irenaeus auerres of Marcus Anaxilaus , and others , that by a familiar Diuell they did wonders , and tell things to come ▪ Epiphanius (h) of Carpocrates and the Gnostickes , that they did by familiar Diuels , and inchantments allure to lust , dominiere ouer the people , and make shew of wonders . The like doth (i) Theodoret , of Basilides and Massilianus ; and Eusebius , of Theodotus and Montanus ; Cyrillus of Buda ; Innocentius of Marcion ; Hierome of Priscilianus in Spaine ; & Seuerus , of one Anatolius , who made himselfe first Elias , then Christ , and by counterfeit miracles deceaued Rufus a Bishop in the same countrey . Caesareus affirmes of the Albigenses , that by the Diuell they walked on the water , to confirme their doctrine , till a priest , extraordinarily moued , cast the Blessed Sacrament into the water , at which they suncke , and the B. Sacrament was by an Angell preserued . Malmesbury and Baronius witnesse , that Fuldo Bishop of Chartres saw the Diuell stand by Berengarius , and as it were , with his hand calling many to come to him . Thus did the Emperour Maximiliā the first ( witnesse Bredenbach ) see the Diuell in a bodily shape sit on the shoulder of Luther at Auspurge , anno 1518. and therby foretould what troubles should arise after his death . Thus doth Luther confesse of himselfe , that he had his doctrine , of abrogating the Masse , of the Diuell . Zuinglius , that he had his figuratiue doctrine from the spirit , blacke , or white he knew not . Caluin , that his veyne of rayling was not Ingenij , but Genij , not of his nature , but his spirit , which cannot be a good spirit , because it is a spirit of rayling , therefore a bad . Luther affirmes of (a) Carolostadius , of (b) Oecolampadius , of (c) Bucer , of (d) Marcus Cauikanus , of (e) the Anabaptists ; Alberus of (f) Osiander , Lindan of (g) Campanus , that they had commerce and directions from the Diuell . King Iames often did affirme of Knocks , witnes (h) Barkclay , that he was a Magitiā . And this of the Anabaptistes , by many experiences , is constātly related , that to read , and remember the Scripture , they are taught by the Diuel , by whome they are thought , to be willingly , & without torments so possessed , that he speake and continue in them , till they returne to the Catholike fayth . By all which examples , and many more most lamētable , is proued not only the craft and subtilty of Sathan ( which is more fully shewed in the next Section , ) but also ( which is by them heere intended ) the vncertainty , & fallibility of the former rules and meanes to discerne these spirits , since Sathan can so cunningly transforme himselfe into an Angell , and his suggestions into Gods seeming inspirations , that it is hard to discerne viam Colubri super Petram , the way of this adder vpon the Rocke of mans hart , and to find out his turninges and windinges among so many his trickes of deceit and subtilty , of which more in the next Section . Of the subtilty of Sathan in deceauing , by the similitude of Spirits . SECT . IIII. THE third difficulty of discerning these spirits , ariseth from the subtilty , the malice , and the power of the Diuell ; for as the Diuell is in subtilty of knowledge a serpent , which was more subtile then all the beastes of the earth ; in venime of malice , a Dragon , out of whose mouth (a) frogges ( of venime ▪ and poison ) did proceed ; and in power , that great Behemoth , (b) whose taile being as trees of Cedar , and his bones as barres of brasse , doth deuour riuers , and swallow Iordan , in at his mouth : So whatsoeuer the deepest Vnderstanding that euer discoursed , can inuent , whatsoeuer the extremest malice that euer was conceaued , can exagerate , and whatsoeuer the greatest power that euer was preualent in any creature can execute , all ioyned with the longest experience that tyme can affoard ; the same is couched togeather in this our mortall and potent enemy , the Diuell ; who as Iob sayth of him , Compasseth the earth : And as S. Peter sayth , Seeketh whome he may deuoure like a Lyon ; all which is imployed to deceaue vs poore , and miserable men , against whome , in enuy to God , whose image we carry , he layes his trapps , and sets his snares to catch our soules , and carry them into the pit of perdition . SVBDIV. 1. Sathans subtilty , by inward suggestions . THIS subtile , malicious , and powerful Serpent , Dragon , and Behemoth , the Diuell , doth by three wayes of subtilty counterfeit the spirit of God , and good Angells , by which he makes the discerning of these spirits doubtfull , and difficult . The first is by a secret and lurking manner of temptation , for the most shrowded vnder the habit of some kind of piety , or deuotion , in which with a subtile progresse he proceeds by a certaine gradation from publicke & apparent temptation , to a secret fraud and illusion , by which searching the veines , and feeling the pulse of euery mans disposition , and by his exteriour wordes or gestures , sauouring the state of his soule , whether he be in sinne or not , and in what sinne , carnal or spiritual ; the dispositiō of his mind , to what he is inclined , to heauinesse or myrth , idlenesse or voluptuousnes , ambition or couetousnesse ; the inclination of his passions & affections , in what they are most vehemēt , to passion or affection , to loue or hatred , reuenge or lust ; the infirmity of his mynd , in what part he is most weake , in his vnderstanding or will , his irascible or concupiscible , or sensible part ; and the oportunity , or occasions of sinne , in which he is most easily catched . He craftily obserues when he is idle and vacant from some good imployment , in what he is watchlesse and carelesse , in the custody of his senses or phantasies , to what he is inclined or affected in his delectations or auersions ; and there he sets the snares of his subtilty and layes the engines of his powers towardes that part , where he findes him most weakly sensed , most negligently guarded , or most apt to bite at his bait . First therefore he plainely propo●es publicke & known sinnes , as murther , adultery , blasphemy , and the like ; if they suffer the repulse , he closely suggests secret , and interiour sinnes , as enuy , hatred , contempt , obstinacy , or such like ; if these take no hould , he watches oportunities and occasions of familiarity , and company to sinnes sensuall and delectable , and vses meanes and instruments to auarice and ambition ; and if none of these will draw men to bite , he baites a fresh with the memory of sinnes past , or possibility of sinnes to come ; if none of these catch , he fishes for lesser sinnes , and smaller imperfections ; he labours to worke a conceit of an impossibility of perfection , a neglect of vertue , & an omission of smaller dutyes ; which if they faile , he rests and forbeares to tempt , and so lulles the soule into a sleep of security , that there by he may at vnawares catch it in a trick of treachery , that while it least apprehends the danger of sinne , he may more easily catch it in a trape of sinne ; with which tricke if he do not catch it into his trappe , he baites a fresh with a new deuice of subtilty , he comes as a new man in a shape , disguised in a new manner of fashion , he shapes himselfe a painted coate of vertue and perfection , and comes out now disguised in a coate of piety & deuotion , that therby he may allure to impiety and superstition ; now veiled vnder the maske of humility and meeknesse , the better to couer his pride and tyranny ; now cloathed with a cloake of equity and iustice , the easier to exercise his reuenge and cruelty ; now painted with faire colours of zeale & charity , and beautifyed with the fairenesse of the word of God , and truth , thereby the more cunningly to conceale his deformity of malice , and heresy , and to intrude his owne word of falsity and impiety . And by this art , he makes slacknesse in ones charge seeme mildnes ; prodigality in ones estate shew as liberality ; auarice , appeare as frugality ; obstinacy , to be accounted constancy ; basenesse , to stand for humility ; slouth for quietnes ; rashnesse , for fortitude ; perturbation of mind , for solicitude of others good . And thus as he cloathes vices with the robes of vertues , so he disrobes vertue , & staines it with the infamy of vice ; as mortification with a note of dissimulation ; piety , of hypocrisy ; charity , of impiety ; zeale , of reuenge ; obedience , of seruitude ; deuotion , of superstition ; adoration , of idolatry ; & Christ , of Antichrist . Whē none of these shewes , and shapes of vertue will preuaile , he will not sticke to persuade good thinges and pious actions : but then it is either to the lesse , to withdraw from the greater good , as by too much rigour of exteriour , to forget the interiour mortification ; by too exact performance of ceremoniall obseruations , to omit interiour perfection ; by too excessiue care and solicitude for the zeale of others good , to forget or neglect the obligation of their owne good . Or if he persuade to any greater good , then it is either with too great vehemency & feruour to consume ones ability without discretion ; or with too much obstinacy and pertinacity to adhere to ones owne opinion against obedience ; or with too vehement perturbation and disquietnesse of mind , to distemper the peace & tranquility of reason ; or with too timerous scrupulosity of imaginatiō of sinne , to the disquiet of conscience . By which , and such like , he intends to make men vnconstant in good purposes , slow in heroicall resolutions , fearefull in pious executions ; he makes them dull in deuotion , carelesse in amendement , precipitate in proceeding , and obdurate in custome of sinne and wickednes . In all which the Wolfe in sheeps cloathing , the Serpent with a womans face , and the Lyon with a lambes skin , that is , the Diuell in the shew of an Angell , deceaues many , and makes , as S. Gregory sayth , Vices seeme vertues , and vertues vices ; makes men looke for a reward , when they deserue a punishmēt ; & makes of high Cedars of perfection , vnprofitable brāches of hel fire . SVBDIV. 2. Examples of Sathans inward suggestions . BY this subtilty he persuaded the Iewes , vnder pretence of sanctifying the Sabaoth , to condemne our Sauiour for curing diseases on the Sabaoth . He preuailed with Iudas , vnder colour of relieuing the poore , to censure Mary Magdalene , anointing our Sauiour , for wast . He deluded Nicolaus , vnder colour of community of all thinges , to make also wiues common . He wrought with Origen , vnder shew of perfection of continency , to geld himselfe ; and in pretext of piety and mercy , to grant a generall saluation of Diuells , and all damned . He drew the Montanists , and after them Tertullian , vnder pretext of more mortification , of fastes , & continency from second mariages , to forsake the Church & condemne it of liberty , and loosenesse . He preuailed with Nouatianus , in shew of greater detestation of sinne , to deny remission of sinnes after relapse . With the Apostolickes in imitation of the Apostles themselues , to allow no mariage at all , and to oblige all to make all thinges common . With the Messalians , or Eutichs , in estimation of prayer , to pray alwaies , and make that alone sufficient to saluation . With the Pacificatours , for the good of peace , to tolerate the Orthodoxe , and the Eutichian doctrine togeather . Thus he persuaded the Donatists , in desire of Martyrdome , to kill themselues . The Flagellantes , in esteeme of disciplining themselues , to prize discipline as Baptisme . Of later tymes he induced the Anabaptists , as aspiring to extraordinary holynesse , to haue women , goods , and all in common : and makes in them shew of reuelations & visions . And as yet , he persuades many , for feare of dishonouring God , not to pray to Saints ; for feare of Idolatry , not to worship Reliques ; in estimation of Scripture , to refuse all Traditions ; and in shew of attributing more to Christ , to take from a man all merit and satisction , from Saints all intercession , from Angells all custody , from the Church all superiority . Thus vnder the winges of piety hath the Diuell hatched many Heresies , and vnder the veile of perfection , shrouded his most wicked abomination of all falshood and impiety . We read also in particuler , how he perswaded one Hierome a Monke , in Cassians tyme , vpō presumptiō of Gods deliuery for his merits , to cast himselfe into a Well . And another , in imitation of Abraham , to attempt the killing of his sonne , which he had done , if the child had not run away . We read also of ancient tymes , how in a solemne festiuity of the Gentils made at Caesarea Philippi , he caused a certaine Pagan victime cast into a fountaine , first to vanish out of sight , and then carryed it vp into the ayre , till by the Prayers of S. Asterins , the same remayned , and did swimme on the water . Also in later tymes he so farre preuailed in one Guido an Heretike , that in his life , and at his death , he was esteemed a Saint , & after his death being discouered for an Hereticke , and his body to be burned , the Diuell defended it from the fire , and eleuated it into the ayre to astonishment of all , till being subdued by holy thinges , he cryed out ; We haue defended thee Guido so long as we could , now we must leaue thee . SVBDIV. 3. Sathans subtilty , by imaginary Illusions . THE second way of his subtilty is , by an inward kind of suggestion , which appearing in the shew of diuine reuelation , doth lead many into the pit of eternall perdition , making them belieue they are inspired by God , when indeed they are deluded by Sathan , whose suggestion in their apprehension runs current for Gods reuelation . Of which we haue examples both ancient & moderne , most frequent . 1. How he deluded Cerinthus with many reuelations , as from certaine of the Apostles , witnesse Caius , and Dionysius Alexandrinus . 2. Marcus an arch-heretike of that tyme , with many prophesies , witnes Irenaeus . 3. Montanus , with many both visions , reuelations , and prophesies , by Maximilla & Quintilla , and with much seeming deuotion , and mortification , which deceaued euen that learned Tertullian , witnesse Apollinaris , Miltiades , Apollonius , and Serapion in Eusebius . 4. Martiades and Martianus arch-heretikes , who made Archangels creatours of the world , with many Harmonies , Symphonies , or propheticall Reuelations , witnesse Epiphanius . 5. Manes the Authour of the Maniches , Iulian the Apostata , Vincentins the Donatist , with many such like , witnesse S. Augustine , and Theodoret. In like manner he hath deluded many of late , with such like feigned reuelations ; as the Lollards in England ; as the Begards or Beguines in Belgia ; the Illuminated in Spaine ; as Munzer the founder of the Anabaptists , and many of his followers ; Campanus Vel●ius in Germany , Francis de la Crux in India . Yea many in England , who either would haue sacrificed their children , as in Crauen in Yorkeshire , diuers anno 1520. questioned for it at Yorke , attempted ; or els did sacrifice them , as one Gray a Lincolne-shireman , who for killing and cutting in peeces his owne sonne , and vttering treasons against King Iames , was executed at Dublin in Ireland . In which kind of illusions , he hath gone so farre , as to persuade some that they were saints , our Lady , our Sauiour , yea the B. Trinity it selfe . Thus in India he persuaded a famous Doctour , deluded by the familiarity of a woman ( who was instructed , as she feigned , frō an Angel ) that he should be not only a King , & Pope , who should translate the Popedome to India , but also was more holy then Angels , had the hypostaticall vnion of God offered him , & was the redeemer of the world ( quoad efficaciā ) & for that end should worke miracles , which by Scripture & shew of miracles , to the admiration of al , euen to the fire & death he defēded . Thus in Spaine he persuaded Gondisalues , that he was the sonne of God eternal , immortal , & the Sauiour of all , euen the damned , which he (a) published in a booke pretended by him to be dictated by the Holy Ghost . In France , he deluded one (b) Eun , a Britaine , another at Bourges , a third at Burdeaux , all of them to thinke that themselues were Christ . In Poland , he persuaded one (c) Melstincke in the tyme of Sigismonde , at Cracouia , to make himselfe Christ , and with twelue Apostles to passe vp and downe the Country , and make shew of miracles , in dispossessing of Diuels , raysing of the dead , & doing by magicke thinges to the vulgar strange and admirable , till discouered , they by whiping were forced to confesse their illusion . In the Low-countryes he persuaded (d) Dauid George , that he was the nephew of God , borne of the holy Ghost , a third Dauid , the true Messias sent to adopt men , children of God , and to fill heauen . Also a (e) Religious woman , that one while the Diuell , another while Iesus Christ did speake in , and that she had power to consecrate ( which she presumed to do ) the body of Christ , by the power of our Sauiour speaking in her . In England he persuaded , in Queene Elizabeths tyme , one Moore , to belieue himselfe to be Christ , and Geffrey his companion to preach it , till by whipping at a Cart they both disclaimed it . And Hacket also after them , to belieue that he was also Christ , come with his fanne in his hand to iudge the earth , which Coppinger & Arthington defended , till Hacket was hanged for it . By all which most lamentable examples of Sathans deluding so many , and some so learned , it is more then apparent , that notwithstanding the former rules of discerning spirits , yet Sathan can so assimilate himselfe , and his suggestions to the spirit , and inspirations of God & good Angels , that it is hard to discerne viam Colubri super petram , the way of this Adder vpon the Rocke of mans hart , and to find out his turninges and windinges among so many his trickes of deceit , and subtilty . Of which yet in the next Section more are discouered , and by variety of more examples confirmed . SVBDIV. 4. Sathans subtilty , by exteriour Visions . THE third art the Diuell vseth , is by illusion of sensible visions , and apparitions , that when his inward motions either to sinne knowne , or secret , or to sinne vnder the shadow of vertue cannot preuaile , or his suggestions insteed of reuelations are discouered ; then he transfigures himselfe into visible shapes and apparitions , not of a Serpent as he did to Eua , but sometymes of a holy man. Sometymes of an Angell , sometimes of our Lady , and our Blessed Sauiour himselfe , and the B. Trinity , and appearing in the forme of thē as though he were one of them . He by that dissimulation seekes to lure soules to his whistle , and to catch them in his net of perdition . In this manner he appeared to our Sauiour in the shape of some venerable man , as is before proued , and tempted him to know if he were God , He presumed to approach to the presence of God , and stood among the sons of God to assist before our Lord , as though he had byn one of them , to obtaine licence to persecute Iob. Thus he clymed vp to the Throne of God , and intruded himselfe among the hoast of heauen ( as Micheas saw him ) about our Lord , and his Throne , and offered to go forth , and be a lying Prophet in the mouth of all the Prophets , to deceaue Achab , and make him belieue , that he should fight prosperously against the King of Syria . Thus in imitation of the Angell in Zachary , he made to Zedechias , the false Prophet of Achab , hornes of iron , and prophesied , though falsly , VVith these Hornes shalt thou strike Syria , till thou destroyest it : And so brought to Achab , and Iosaphat to fight , to both their dangers , and Achabs destruction . Thus did he appeare to the Virgin and Martyr Iuliana , in the midest of his torments vnder Dioclesian , in the shape of a glorious Angel , telling her he was the Angell of our Lord , sent for that end , to wish her to auoid the torments , by counterfeiting the offering of sacrifice , because God was not so cruell as to expect the fortitude of brasse in mortall bodyes , and had deceaued her , if God had not by her prayers , sent a voice from heauen to bewray him , and confort her . Thus he appeared to S. Abraha● an Hermit , witnesse S. Ephrem , in the shape of an Angel shining like the Sunne , at midnight in his Cell , while he was singing , & told him he was so blessed that none was like to him , thereby to exalt him to pride , had not his humble confessing him to be a sinner , and calling vpon Iesus , mad● him vanish away in smoke . Thus he shewed himself to S. Simeon Stylites vpō his pillar , witnesse Antonius his scholer , in the forme of an Angel with a fiery Chariot , and Horses , saying he was sent to take him , as another Elias , to heauen , because the Angells , Apostles , Martyrs , and Prophets , with our B. Lady , desired to see him ; & had deceaued him , if with the signe of the Crosse which he made , as he was about to set his foot into the Chariot , he had not driuen him away . In the like sort he appeared to S. Iohn the Hermite , who foretould Theodosius of his victory , and would haue had him to adore him . Thus he deceaued a certaine Monk ( witnes Cassianus ) to whome , after many false reuelations , he shewed the Christians with the Apostles mourning , and Moyses with the Iewes reioycing , & thereby persuaded him to circumcise himselfe , and become a Iew. Thus in the shap of Moyses ( witnesse Socrates ) he persuaded many Iewes in Creete , to cast themselues from a Rocke into the Sea , in assurance to passe the Sea dry foot , and so to enter againe into the Land of Promise . Sometimes this audacious dissembler hath not beene afraid to assume to himselfe ( thereby the easier to deceaue ) the shape and representation of the Mother of the sonne of God , and of God , of the B. Trinity it selfe . Thus of ancient we read , how he appeared to S. Martin , glorious like a King , richly adorned and crowned , saying to him : I am Christ , who am descended frō heauen to visit thee ; & had deceaued him , if S. Martin inspired by God to know him , had not sayd : I will not belieue that Christ will come in any forme , but that in which he was crucified , at which he vanished away . How he appeared to Secundillus a Deacō , in the shape of Christ , in his Cell , saying : I am Christ , to whome thou so much prayest , & thereby not only persuaded him to leaue his Cell , and to go abroad into the Countrey and do good , but also did by him cure diseases and do strange cures ; whereupon being by his Superiour reprehended , became penitent , commanding the Diuell , that if he were Christ , he should shew the Crosse on which he suffered , he thereupon , and at the signe of the Crosse vanished away and left him . How he appeared to other two mentioned by Gerson , and S. Bonauenture , in the same forme , saying : I am Christ , to whome the one shutting his eyes , and saying : I desire to see Christ in heauen not on earth ; and the other saying : I am not worthy to see Christ , because I am a sinnefull man , the Diuell vanished . How he appeared to S. Pachomius , saying : I am Christ , and am come to thee my faythful seruant , which the holy man by the perturbation of his mind , perceauing to be a Diuel , with the signe of the Crosse made him to vanish . How to Valens a Monke he appeared like Christ , accompanied with many Angells , and caused him to come forth of his Cell , and adore him , & left him so distracted , and raging , that they were forced to bind him . Of examples of later tymes , we read , that he molested the holy man S. Ignatius , in the founding of his Order of the Society , not only interiourly by suggestions , which he did at his study , when by high and mysticall illuminations , he withdrew his attention from his learning the Grammer rules , to which he had seriously applyed himselfe ; but also by visible apparitions , when at Manresa in his first entrance into a spirituall course , he appeared in the forme of a beautiful person with many colours , and eyes , compassing the Crosse before which he prayed , which S. Ignatius by the pensiuenes and perturbation of his mind discouering , caused him by his prayer to vanish . 2. That in the Alpes , the Diuell hauing seduced a Priest , who had the B. Sacrament about him , to go in curiosity with him to see a wonder , brought him to a pallace most beautiful & pleasant , where a Lady in a throne was presented by many , prostrating themselues before her with rich guiftes , vntill the Priest offering the B. Sacrament to her , thinking it was our B. Lady , she and all vanished away , and left him in a strange place , many miles distant from his habitation . 3. Thirdly , to an Hermite , and a Religious man , deceaued by him in Germany in a desart place to which they were carryed , he appeared in the shape of Christ a King , and our B. Lady a Queene , both glorious , set in a rich pallace vpon a shining throne with thousands of Angells , and Saints about them , and receaued al adoration from them , till by the B. Sacrament , which the Religious had in a Pixe , offered to them , al vanished away . That he appeared to certaine women about Milan the yeare 1590. in the habit now of a Monke , now of S. Vrsula with many Virgins with her , and now of our B. Sauiour , amōg whome he persuaded one to be Religious , and leaue the world , and would not desist , till she tould him , she would not do any thing without the aduice of her Ghostly Father . And to conclude , we read , how while S. Norbert the foūder of the Praemonstratenses was meditating vpon the B. Trinity , the Diuell appeared with three heads , telling him , that for his deuotion he had deserued to see the B. Trinity , which by the perturbations of his mind , he perceauing to be the Diuell , defied him , and so was rid of him . All which , with many more the Diuels apparitions and illusions in histories most authenticall recorded , what are they , but so many conuincing arguments to proue both the difficulty of discerning spirits , and also the impossibility of euery priuate spirit to do it ? The difficulty to discerne Spirits , proued by scripture . SECT . V. THE last reason , to proue the difficulty of discerning spirits , is authority ( which is a confirmation to all the former experiences and examples ) of holy Scripture , and holy men , placing the guift of discerning of spirits among the guifts of graces gratis giuen ( to some the discerning of spirits ) doth shew , that as the rest of the guifts , to wit , miracles , tongues , prophesies , and interpreting of Scripture ( of which before ) and the rest , are rare , extraordinary , and giuen to few , and that vsually and necessarily conioyned with grace , or fayth in euery faithfull belieuer : so also this of discerning spirits is in like manner , a guift not cōmunicated to euery faythfull belieuer , who hath the spirit of God , but rarely and extraordinarily to some , who haue the priuiledg of this benefite bestowed vpon them , for the benefit of others . For as it is proper to God both to be , and to be called . (a) Ponderator spirituum , The weigher , and discerner of Spirits , in the same manner as he is the knower of harts , (b) VVho only knowes the hartes of all the children of men : so doth he communicate this guift to some speciall persons , whome he makes , as the Prophets cal them , (c) Proouers , and strong proouers in my people , who shall know and prooue their wayes , in the same manner as in the common wealth are tryers of gold to discerne true , from false . And to these by a speciall prerogatiue he giues this guift , that they (d) may prooue spirits if they be good , and (e) try them , as Gold is tryed in the fire , and (f) separate the precious , from the vile , declaring when it is good , or a good Angell who knocks at the doore , and when it is Sathan , and the bad Angell , who transfigures himselfe into an Angell of light . And as this guift is rare , & giuen only to some ; so it is for the most part giuen to Superiours , who are to direct others in the way of vertue and perfection ; & amōg these , to them who are men humble , as Cassianus affirmes , and very spirituall also , because , Not the sensuall man , but the spirit of God perceaues the thinges which are of God. These partly by long experience , partly by wholesome documents , partly by diuine inspirations , attaine to this perfectiō of discercerning spirits . By which is apparent , that the science of discerning spirits is hard and difficult , because it requires so speciall and supernaturall a guift , which is so rare and extraordinary , and that to speciall kind of persons for the good of others , Which is also confirmed by the testimony of holy men , who haue laboured much , and beene experienced long in this science . S. Bernard , a man extraordinarily spirituall , confesseth that he knew not , VVhen the spirit entred , or when it departed ; which way it came , or which it went ; sometyms he could perceaue it to be present , or to haue beene present ; but neither when it came , or how it went. Gerson a man learned , who laboured and writ much about this discerning of spirits , after much discussion , sayth : That it is a most hard thing to discerne among so many spirits , since in diuerse and contrary spirits there is sush a similitude of inspirations . Thomas à Kempis , one much enlightned in spirituall affaires , sayth : Marke the motions of thyne own nature and my grace ; for in very contrary and secret manner these are moued , and can hardly be discerned , but by him that is spirituall , and inwardly enlightned . Ludouicus Puentes also a maister in spirituall wayes , sayth : That it seemes often an inspiration of God , which is an impulsion of Sathan , and it often carryes a shew of spirituall loue , which is indeed false and carnall loue . And thus it remaines conuinced by reasons drawne from the verity and similitude of spirits by the subtilty and craft of Sathan , who so often and many wayes , transfigures himselfe into an Angell , by the infirmity of mans vnderstanding so vnable to penetrate them ; and by authority of Scripture , and testimony of holy men so experienced in this science , that the art of discerning of spirits is most hard and difficult in it selfe , and aboue the reach and capacity of euery priuate mans ability . Out of all which it doth follow . First , that visions and apparitions are often tymes doubtfull and dangerous , and so rather to be feared , whether they be true or false , and to what end they do tend , then to be desired , or esteemed as signes of holynesse and perfection . For as the guifts gratis giuen , Prophesy , Curing of diseases , and Dispossessing of Diuells &c. are giuen sometymes to persons lesse perfect in vertue , if not vicious in life , and vnbelieuers for fayth : witnesse the prophesyes of the Sybils ( being Gentils ) of Christ ; Of (a) Baalam a sorcerer , of the starre of Iacob ; Of (b) Caiphas most wicked , of Christ dying for all ; Of (c) Saul a reprobate , who had the spirit , and was among the Prophets ; All which had the gift of prophesy . Witnesse also the sonnes of the (d) Pharisies , who cast out Diuels ; & the seauen sonnes of (e) Sceua , with the exorcists of the Iewes , who dispossessed many of Diuels ; so also these visions and apparitions are neither so proper to holy men , but that often they are communicated to bad and wicked , nor yet so certaine that they are alwayes of God , or good Angells , but that they often proceed from Satan ; and as the visions of those spirits , so also the guift of discerning the same , is neyther so proper omni , and soli , to all , and only the good and faythfull , but that it is sometymes giuen to them who are lesse holy , and more wicked of life . Whereupon holy , and wise learned men , as S. Augustine , S. Bonauenture , and Gerson , aduise and persuade , that not only such visions and apparitions are to be feared , yea auoided , and not desired ; but also ordinary persons who haue them , and make shew or ostentation of them , are not to be applauded or admired for them as pious , but seuerely to be reprehended suspected as proud and dangerous , who are not content to tread the high way and beaten path to perfection , but will seeke out new by-wayes , and walke in wonders aboue thēselues . Also many holy persons who haue beene extraordinarily visited from God with them , haue alwayes with that warinesse accepted of them , that they did vse great diligence to examine them , before they would confide in thē . Thus (f) Iacob secretly and diligently considered the visions of Ioseph his sonne related to him . (g) Iosue doubted , & therupon examined the Angell who did appeare to him like an armed man , whether he was of their side , or of the aduersaries . (h) Samuel heard our Lord when he called him in the night , Samuel , Samuel , but did not answere till he rose and went to Heli the high Priest , to know what he should do . (i) Elias seriously deliberated whether our Lord did appeare in the whirle wind , or in the commotion , or in the fire , or in the soft whispering wind . And our (k) B. Lady ( cogitabat ) did muse or study , that is , maturely , and long ( sayth Euthymius ) consider what kind of salutation that was , whether of God , or the Diuell . And the like did the Bishop of Cyprus , at the apparition of S. Barnaby . And S. Ambrose at the inuētion of Geruasius and Protasius . And other holy Saints in all such like occasions , fearing alwayes illusions of Sathan insteed of apparitions of Angells . Secondly . It doth follow , that it is necessary , to auoid all these and such like dangers , to haue euery one a spirituall directour and Maister , on whome as better experienced by practise , & more illuminated by God in his place & functiō , he may more securely rely , then vpon his owne spirit or iudgment . For as the wayes in which men walke are many , & the right way to heauen not easy to be found ; as in the way being found there are many either pits to fall in , or theeues to robbe , and spoile vs ; as the science we are to learne is very heard and intricate , to which our natural wit cannot attaine , and the diseases & infirmities of our body are many & great for which we are vnable to trauell so long and laborious a iourney : So haue we need , & great need of a guide to lead vs in a way so vncertaine and dangerous ; of a Maister to instruct vs in a trade so hard and vnknowne ; and of a Phisitian to cure vs of so many infirmities and diseases . And as no man hath power to absolue himselfe of his sinnes , as no man is made Iudge in his owne cause , as no man is permitted to minister phisicke to his owne body ; so God hath ordained that no man shal be instructer & directour of his owne soule , nor conductour of himselfe in his way to life , but stil depend vpon others to direct and instruct him in the same . For thus our Sauiour first himselfe , for example , would sit hearing and asking among the Doctours , as though he were a scholler . For this cause he sent his vessel of election S. Paul , to be instructed by Ananias , and would not immediatly himselfe direct him what to doe . For this , God would not instruct Moyses in the mountaine himselfe , but sent him to Iethro a gentill , by him to receaue direction , how to gouerne his people . For this S. Augustine being old refused not to be instructed by his Companions yet yong . And thus we read that some who haue had familiar conuersations with Angels , were yet permitted by them to hould some errours in doctrine , till they humbled themselues to others , and by them were instructed . For which it is a generall rule , that he who will not be a disciple to another shal be a maister of errour , and that he who makes himselfe maister to himself , puts himselfe to be scholler to a foole . All which if it be true in morall sciences , & mysteries of faith ; most true it is in discerning of these spirits , in which the difficulty is greater , & the dāger of errour no lesse . 3. To conclude , it doth follow , that since there is such variety of spirits , some good , as of God , of Angels , and of Saints ; and some bad , as of diuels , of the damned , of the flesh , and of the world : Sith there be so diuers kinds of motions , & apparitions of these spirits , some intellectuall , some imaginary , some sensible and visible : Sith there are so great difficulties to be resolued about these seuerall apparitions , so great similitude in their motions , and apparitions , so many rules and differences , vpon long experience , haue beene giuen to discerne them , and so great skill & cunning is requisite to apply them : Sith there be so many , and so dangerous wayes to take , as of Pagans , Iewes , Turks , Heretikes , all differing & condemning one another , all depending vpon the motions of these spirits : Sith such and so high is the excellency of the nature of these spirits to be discerned , such and so weake the infirmity of man to discerne them , & such and so subtile , malicious , and powerfull is mans enemy the Diuell , to deceaue in them , by counterfeit dissimulation of piety , or by forged illusions insteed of reuelations , or by outward apparitions in forme of Saints , Angels , or God , all by verity of examples confirmed : Sith so speciall & extraordinary , so rare and vnvsuall is this gift of discerning these spirits : Sith , I say , all this is so as is proued ; with what reason and iudgment can any man make this priuat spirit , or rather selfe-seeming conceit of his owne braine , a competent , sufficient and infallible iudge to discerne and decide al these questions and difficulties arising vpon them ? What braine-sicke madnesse , & senslesse presumption is it , for euery silly , simple and vnlearned person , man or woman ( all of which challēg this spirit ) to assume so much to themselues , and presume so farre vpon their owne conceit , as to discerne , and declare which of euery one of these spirits is of God , the deuill , or nature ? which is good or bad ? which true or false , either in thēselues or others ? and vpon this presumption , to ground the certainty of their religion , faith , and saluation ? What greater temerity and rashnes can there be , then to build a worke so great and important , as is the eternity of saluation or damnation , vpon no more solid and certaine a ground , then is the proper conceit of euery priuate motion of an vncertaine spirit ? Surely , if men were not blind , or bewitched , and that either willfully or foolishly blinded or bewitched , and both so deeply , that they eyther will not , or cannot see what both sense & reason doth dictate to their owne conscience , what both authority and testimony of God , and holy men doth lay before them , what both examples & experience of so many ages doth confirme vnto thē ; surely , they could not but often doubt , and distruct , & many tymes stagger and relent ( their owne iudgment & conscience , doubtlesse pricking them ) in this their ostentation of the certainty of their spirit ; they could not but sometyms enter into consideration , yea and feele a sensible touch of trepidation in soule , and stand in a wonder and amazemēt at themselues , how they dare venture so far , and stand so confidently in so weighty a matter , vpon the judgement of so vncertaine , vnconstant , & vnwarranted , yea corrupted , deceitfull , and partiall a Iudge , as is this their priuate spirit , conceit , & imagination . What man of reason and discretion , or of care & conscience , will not hould it farre more secure and safe in these points of eternity , with euery good Catholike , to ioyne his spirit with the spirit of the Saints and seruants of God , now reigning in heauen , to subiect his spirit to the spirit of Gods holy Church heere on earth , guided infallibly by an infallible spirit of God , and by conforming themselues to this spirit , to imbrace and follow that Fayth and religion , that doctrine and discipline , that sacrifice and sacraments , which so many Saints and holy men , so many Confessours and learned Doctours , so many Churches and Councells in all ages , throughout all Countryes , belieued in their harts , professed by their liues , defended by their writinges , and sealed and confirmed with their liues & bloud ? And thus much for the first reason against the priuate spirit , drawne from the difficulty to discerne spirits . THE PRIVATE SPIRITS AVTHORITY To interprete Scripture , and iudge of Fayth , confuted by reasons , drawne from the true and infallible authority , and meanes of interpreting holy Scripture . CHAP. V. VVhat Interpretation , Authority , and meanes are necessary & infallible for the sense of Scripture . SECT . I. SVBDIV. 1. What Interpretation of Scripture is necessary ? THE better to vnderstand the reasons drawne from the infallible authority , and meanes of interpreting of Holy Scripture , by which the priuate spirits authority is confuted , we may consider , 1. What interpretatiō that is , which is required as necessary . 2. What authority , as infallible , is required to this intetpretation , and in whome it is resident . 3. What meanes are to be vsed and followed , as certaine by these Interpreters to this interpretation . Out of all which may be inferred and proued the insufficiency of the priuate spirit , to be eyther authour , or meanes of this interpretation of Scripture . First therefore , when we speake of the sense and interpretation of scripture , we speake not of that sense and interpretation which is only probable and credible , but of that which is certaine , and infallible . Not of that which is only for the pulpit and documents of manners , or which is for the schooles and subtiltyes of diuinity ; but of that which is for doctrine of Fayth and articles of beliefe . Not of that which is only to confirme and increase vs in that fayth which we already belieue , but of that which is to persuade and produce fayth a new , eyther in our selues , when , and why we first belieue ; or in others , whome we persuade , first to belieue . And this is that sense of Scripture , which as it is ( being rightly vnderstood , in the sense which the holy Ghost intended ) a firme and solide foundation of true fayth ; so being falsly vnderstood , and wikedly peruerted by false teachers , it is the Mother or nurse of al heresies . For as nothing is persuaded as worthy of beliefe , but which is true , or vnder the shew of truth , and as the scripture is by all granted to be most true : so all vse the text of Scripture as a meane to persuade , that which they would haue to be belieued as true ; the true teachers in the true sense , the false in the false sense , both cyting the wordes and text , but the one in that sense and meaning which the holy Ghost intended , the other in that which they themselues inuented . Which course of false sense , as the Diuell first beganne , when he would haue by Scripture persuaded Christ to cast himselfe downe headlong , saying , It is written , he hath giuen his Angels charge ouer thee : So the members of Sathan follow the same way , and labour by the same Scripture to seduce the members of Christ , as the faythlesse , the faythfull ; the sacrilegious , the religious ; the Heretikes , the Catholikes . For the Iewes would by Scripture haue proued that Christ was not only not Messias , saying , Search the Scriptures , and see that from Gallilee a Prophet ryseth not , but also that he was a malefactour , and such a one as ought to dye , saying , VVe haue a law , and according to our law , he ought to dye . And the same is continued both by Turkes , who receaue both the old and new Testament , but interpreted according to Mahomets Alcaron , and also by all Heretiks , who seek to fill their books not ōly with words of Scripture , but ( sayth Vincent . Lyrin . ) with thousands of testimonies , thousands of examples , thousands of authorityes , out of the Law , the Psalmes , the Prophets , the Apostles , which expounded after a new and ill manner , would thereby throw downe soules from the tower of Catholike fayth , to the pit of wicked heresy ; being as our Sauiour sayth of them , false Prophets , or teachers , who vnder the garments of sheep , that is ( sayth Vincent . Lyrin . the wordes of the Prophets and Apostles ) are rauenous VVolues infesting the fold of the Church , and deuouring the flocke of Christ , and saying , Christ is heere or there , that is , as Origen expounded it , in this or that text of Scripture ; who thus transfiguring themselues into the shew of Apostles or preachers of Christ , do labour to transfer the people into another Ghospell ; who depraue the Scripture to their owne and others destruction : And by the wordes of the Law , sayth S. Ambrose , impugne the Law , and do frame a false sense of the wordes of the Law , that they may confirme their owne peruerse opinions by the authority of the Law. Against al whome we may note the wordes of S. Hilary , saying : That Heresy is about the vnderstanding , not the text of Scripture ; the sense , not the words , is the sinne . And of S. Hierome ; That the Ghospell is not in the wordes , but the sense of scripture ; not in the outward rine , but in the inward marrow ; not in the leaues of wordes , but in the root of the sense . SVBDIV. 2. Who haue authority to make the Interpretation of Scripture ? SEcondly , this sense and meaning of scripture , because it is not facil and easy to be knowne to all , by reason of the great obscurity in the wordes , the great fecundity in the sense , and the great profundity in the mysteries , or articles belieued , ( which cannot by euery one , nor by any one , without the assistance of the same spirit which penned it , be vnderstood ) therfore is necessary some authentical , certain , and infallible authority , for the true vnderstanding of this authenticall , certaine , and infallible sense of scripture . This authority , because it is in the Catholike Church , & chiefly in the Pastours and Prelates of the same , for the better gouernement of it in true doctrine , vpon whom God hath bestowed the infallible assistance of his holy spirit , ( as is afterward proued ) therfore their authority is necessary for the finding out the true and certaine sense of scripture . Whensoeuer therfore the chiefe Pastour , or Pastours of the Church vsing the meanes for it appointed ( of which in the next proposition ) do , either ex Cathedra , or in a Councell confirmed & approued , or by a generall consent , propose , deliuer , and declare any sense or exposition of scripture as true , and to be belieued as an article of faith in any controuersy against heretikes , then is that sense to be receaued , for their authority , as authenticall , certaine , and infallible . From whence ensues , that though in matters of Philosophy and reason we must rather attend what is said , thē by whome it is said , and respect rather the force , then the authority of the person who sayes it ; yet in matters of faith we must first respect them who preach , and the authority and commission of their person , and by it iudge of their doctrine preached . For if the person be lawfully sent , if he haue lawfull commission , if he be a lawfull pastour , not deuided by heresy or schisme from the whole body ; then the people are to attend to him , and for his commission to receaue his doctrine : but if he want mission & commissiō , if he teach of himselfe and his owne authority , if he produce the doctrine not of the Church-proposition , but of his owne inuention ; let him teach what he wil , proue it how he wil , he is not to be heard nor belieued by the common and vulgar people ; to whom it belonges to be obedient & subiect to the authority of their Pastour , not to iudge of the verity of his doctrine more , then in generall , whether it be consonant or dissonant from the vniuersally receaued doctrine of the Church ( for they are to (a) obey their Pastours , to remaine in the same rule (b) in the faith first deliuered , (c) in that which they heard from the beginning , (d) to auoid profane nouelties of words , (e) & not to receiue any other Ghospel (f) or doctrine , (g) but that which they learned and receaued from the beginning ) leauing the particulars to the testimony of others , either equal to their pastour in function , or superiour to him in authority . Which point is to be noted against the Manichees of old , and the Protestants of late , who respect not the authority of the Preacher , but the force of his reason : & attend not to the commission of the Pastour , who he is that teacheth , but to the plausibility of his doctrine , what it is , and how far it is pleasing to their priuat spirit , disposition , or iudgment . SVBDIV. 3. What meanes are to be vsed to make this Interpretation : and of foure Rules of infallible interpreting of scripture . Thirdly . The meanes which are to be obserued , vsed , and followed by these Pastours or Prelats for the securing vs of this true sense of scripture , are these . 1. The rule of faith , that is , the Catholike and vniuersally receiued doctrine of faith and piety which was deliuered by the Apostles , & receiued by posterity . 2. The generall practise , or obseruatiō , custome or tradition of the whole Church in pointes where the doctrine is not certaine . 3. The auncient exposition , or consent of the holy fathers and doctours of the primitiue Church , where the former do not appeare . 4. The decrees and definitions of the Councels , either generall , or prouincial , approued by generall , and the conformity to them in all expositions doubtfull . Th●se are as so many rules or conducts , according to which the certaine , and authenticall sense of scripture is , by the Pastours of gods Church , to be squared and guided . First , that the rule of fayth is to be presupposed , obserued and followed in the finding out the true sense of scripture , is proued . 1. This rule of Fayth is by S. Paul ( who often doth mention it ) called sometymes a rule which bringeth peace , VVho (a) haue followed this rule , peace be on them . Sometimes a rule in which they are to remaine to auoid dissentions , Let (b) vs remaine in the same rule , that we may iudge the same . Sometymes his rule which he deliuered to them and by which they are to increase in fayth , Your (c) fayth increasing according to our rule . Sometymes a reason of Fayth , according to which is giuen the guift of prophesy , or interpretation of scripture , Donations (d) or prophesy , according to the rule of Fayth . And in effect it is no other , but the (e) doctrine they receaued ; (f) the fayth preached through the whole world ; (g) the disposition or forme of true doctrine , which they had learned , and is committed to them , The (h) doctrine which they receaued frō the beginning ; VVhich (i) was first euangelized to them ; Or (k) the precepts of the Apostles and ancients ; Or (l) rather of our Sauiour deliuered by the holy Prophets and Apostles ; And (m) the word of God which remaines for euer . That the knowledge of this rule or doctrine of fayth is presupposed to the true knowledge , and vnderstanding of scripture , is proued both by scripture , and reason . By scripture , the Prophet Isay sayth , as S. Cyprian , and S. Augustine do both of them read and vnderstand it : Except you belieue , you cannot vnderstand , that is , sayth S. Cyprian , the Iewes cannot vnderstand the scripture , except they first belieue in Christ . S. Augustine sayth : There be some of you , who vnderstand not , and therefore they vnderstand not , because they belieue not ; let vs first adhere by Fayth that we may be reuiued by vnderstanding . And in another place : Fayth must go before Vnderstanding , that the vnderstanding may be the reward of Fayth . Therefore Fayth , and the rule of fayth , is necessary before the vnderstanding of Scripture . Secondly , the Scripture for the sense , is a Booke sealed with seauen seales : these seales none can open , but he , who hath the key of Dauid . This key of Dauid is giuen only to them who are faythfull with Dauid , therfore the key of faith is requisit to the opening the sense of the booke of scripture : which is confirmed by S. Hierome , who alleadging the same words sayth ; The Law is spirituall , and requires reuelation , that it be vnderstood . For proofe of which he produceth the example of the Eunuch , who read , but vnderstood not the scripture , till Philip did expound it to him , made him faythfull , and so became of a scholler , a Maister . Thirdly , Euery learned Scribe in the Kingdome of Heauen is like to a man , the maister of a family , who bringeth out of his treasure new and old . The Scribes were the Maisters and Interpreters of scripture , but they were in the kingdome of heauen , that is , in the Church , by Fayth , and so did interprete the new and old Testament ; which S. Augustine alleadging to the same purpose against the Manichees sayth : You (*) vnderstand not because you belieue not , as sayth I say , for you are not instructed in the kingdome of heauen , that is , in the true Catholike Church of Christ ; for if you were , you would produce old and new out of the scriptures . Therfore one must be a scholler in the Church by fayth , before he can come to vnderstand the scripture , as a Maister . Fourthly , S. Paul sayth to Timothy : Thou hast learned holy scriptures from thy infancy , which are able to instruct thee to saluation by fayth , which is in Christ. If the scriptures instruct by Fayth , then Fayth is prerequired before we can be instructed by them , or vnderstand them . Fifthly , the holy Fathers and Doctours of the Church haue , by the breach of this rule , as a signe , discerned Heretikes , and by the authority of it , as a strong argument , confuted the same . Thus were discerned Marcion , Valentinus , C●rinthus , and Basilides , by their deprauing the rule of truth ; witnesse (a) Irenaeus . Thus Paulus Samosatenus , by his forsaking the Canon of the Church , and flying to strange and adulterous doctrine . Thus Montanus , by his vttering strange words , contrary to the custome of the Church , deriued by tradition and succession from the Apostles , witnes of both (b) Eusebius . Thus Nestorius , by forsaking the ancient doctrine , and introducing of new , witnes (c) Socrates . And thus all Heretikes , by their forsaking the rule of Christianity , witnesse (d) S. Augustine . They being all esteemed to haue truth on their side , who walke according to the rule which the Church receaued from the Apostles , the Apostles from Christ , witnes (e) Tertullian . Thus did S. Hierome (f) confute , and confound the heresy of the Luciferians , by the light of the Sunne of the Church . (g) Gregorius Nazianzen the same , by the doctrine abhorring the same . (h) S. Basil the Eunomians , by the vnwrittē tradition of the Church . (i) Athanasius the Arians , by the authority of the Orthodoxe Church , and his ancestors opposite to them , and abhorring their doctrine . (k) S. Epiphanius the Melchisidechians , by the tradition of the Apostles , and succession of doctrine . The (l) Millenarians , by their transgressing the limits of the holy Church of God , and the hope of Propheticall and Apostolicall tradition in fayth and doctrine : And the (m) Demer●s , and other Heretikes , by the style of Christianisme , and the phrase of the Apostles receaued from the Fathers . S. Augustine (n) the Pelagians , by the grounded custome of the Church , hastening to baptisme infants . (o) By the most ancient knowne and vndoubted rule of Fayth , & truth . (p) And by the authority of the Church so commended in scr●pture . The (q) Donatists , by the authority of the Church , and by apostolicall Tradition . And both Irenaeus , Origen , and S. Augustine did confute all Heretikes , by the tradition of the Apostles , manifest to the whole world in the Church , sayth (r) Irenaeus . By the Ecclesiasticall tradition dissented off by none , sayth (s) Origen . By the Catholike Church , whose not receauing any opinion is sufficient ( sayth (t) S. Augustine ) to confound any heresy . Therfore the doctrine and practise of the ancient Fathers was to discerne and confute all Heretikes by this rule of Fayth . Sixthly , the same is proued by Reason , because the scripture is the booke of the faythfull , not the faithlesse ; therefore as it was writ to the faythfull , as the conuerted Iewes , Romans , Corinthians &c. so it is vnderstood truely , only by the faythfull , as the Christians , not by the Infidels , as the Iewes , Turkes , and Heretikes , who haue , and read the wordes , but vnderstand not the sense , & meaning , because the veile is yet ouer their eyes , in the reading of it , for want of fayth ; therefore the letter , that is , the words and reading of it doth kill them , and is to them a ministration of death ; and only the spirit , that is , the vnderstanding of it doth giue life to them who haue fayth . Of which necessity of Fayth , prerequired to the vnderstanding of Scripture , see Stapleton de principijs Doctrinalibus , where the same is further proued out of the ancient Fathers testimonyes , to wit , S. Augustine , Irenaeus , Origen , Athanasius , Cyrill of Alexandria , Theodoret , and Vincentius Lyrin . who sayth , that the holy and learned men did interprete the holy Scripture , according to the traditions of the Catholike Church , and the rule of Catholike fayth . And againe , That the line of propheticall and Apostolicall interpretation must be directed according to the rule of the Catholike and Ecclesiasticall sense . Which , and much more he alleadges against the custome of Heretikes , who haue alwayes the Scripture in their mouth , and out of it do confirme their errours . Out of which may be inferred , how vntruly and fraudulently the Protestants do generally auerre , that in the scripture the spirit of God is , and is to be sought and found ; and that by industry and reading of the words and text the spirit is to be found . Whereupon they make the words of scripture , as they are heard or read , not only the organ or instrument of faith , as much as wee make the Sacrament instrument of grace ; but also the sole instrument , which with diligence read or heard , they prescribe as the only meanes to receiue faith and saluation . For first , as a man consists of body and soule , and the body of it selfe being senslesse & dead , is the inferiour ●●rt ; the soule being life and giuing life , is the principal part , without which he is not man : So the Scripture consists of the words or text which is read or heard , and is only the body , barke , or couering of Gods word , and of the sense and meaning which is vnderstood & belieued , and is the life , soule and substance of the scripture . Now the words , as they are written or spoken , consisting of letters , syllables , & words , are dead without life , and common to Gentils , Iewes , and hereticks , with the faithfull : yea in the same manner as the law is called a law of sinne ; so are they by S. Paul , said to Kill , & to be ministration of death . Because according to S. August . the letter read and not truly vnderstood , or not performed , is occasion of heresy and sinne ; some gathering out of it , as out of the flower , poison of heresy like the spider ; others hony of faith like the bee . The sense and meaning , as it is truly vnderstood & belieued ( which is properly the word of God ) is an effectuall meanes more piercing thē any two-edged sword , & an operatiue vertue to saluation , but to whome ? to all that belieue . And to whom it is so proper , that it is by faith only conceaued and attained , and by faith only belieued & vnderstood ? Secondly . As the bare letter , words , and text of scripture without true sense are not the word of God , so they do not containe the spirit of God or the holy ghost in them , neither is the holy ghost thus inherent , resident , or to be sought & found in the scripture , but in the hart and soule of the writers of scripture , that is , the Prophets or Apostles , in whom as it did remaine , and dictate to them what they writ , so did it reueale and manifest to them the true sense & meaning of the same , though perhaps not alwayes the whole & complete meaning , and all senses of the scripture ( for by reason of the fecundity of senses in Gods word , many , or al of them were not , according to S. Augustine alwayes reuealed to the same Apostles or prophets , but some reserued to the authour of it the holy ghost it selfe . ) And as the spirit of God is not inherent or resident in the bare words , sillables , or text of scripture ; so the spirit or spiritual true sense of scripture is not to be sought or found only in , or out of the bare words , and their grammaticall signification , but out of the rule of faith expounded according to the Ecclesiasticall and Catholike doctrine of beliefe . Not by humane labour and industry of study , but by the meane of faith and diuine reuelation . For the words are translated into other languages different from that in which they were originally written , and haue diuers and various significations and senses , as litterall , moral , allegoricall , and anagogicall ; and are by seuerall expositions drawne to suport diuers seuerall , yea contrary faithes , and religions . Also great labour , diligence and study haue beene vsed by many men of great wit , learning , and knowledge in the expounding & seeking out the true sense of scripture , who yet haue beene so far from finding it , as that they haue inuented many false and heretical meanings , and therupon grounded many wicked and damned heresies . Out of al which it doth follow , that the words of scripture , and the diligent and frequent reading or hearing of it , are so far from being a necessary meanes of faith , much lesse the sole & whole meanes to it , that faith is a meanes necessary & presupposed to the vnderstanding of scripture . For if the scripture consist not in the words and letter only , but in the sense & vnderstanding principally ; and if the sense depend not vpon the bare words , but vpō the Ecclesiastical & catholicke rule , & tradition of faith , as is proued ; then must faith be prerequired , as a help and meanes to find out the true sense of scripture . And they who will read scripture must bring faith with them , as a help and meanes to vnderstand the scripture , and not ground their faith vpon their reading of scripture ; which being diligently read , though it may serue to cōfirme and nourish faith in ones selfe , or to illustrate and defend it to others , and in both being , according to the rule of faith interpreted , a light to direct them in the way of piety , and to enflame them with the heat of Charity : yet it can neither be a first , and firme ground to cause and produce first and certaine faith in any ( for a man must bring faith to belieue it ) nor a sufficient meanes to resolue all points of faith necessary to saluation , as besids other reasons , the practise of so many heresies , diuided , & pretended to be grounded all vpon it , doth conuince ; and the experience made ( for example ) of three persons , Iews , Turks , or Pagans , all ignorant of Christian religion , all turned to a bare text of the bible , all willed to seeke out , and resolue in particular articles , formerly or presently controuerted in Christian religion , will no doubt , by their seuerall & contrary resolutions , confirme the same . And thus much of the rule of faith as a necessary meanes of expounding scripture . The second meanes of expounding the holy scriprure , is the generall practise or obseruation , the publike Custome or tradition of the whole Church , in the exercise of any religious seruice or worship , or in the practise of any sacrifice , sacrament , or ceremony , in which as the Church it selfe cannot erre , so it may be a guide in expounding the scripture to keep others from errour , that where the doctrine of the Church is not euident , there the practise and obseruation of the same may serue . This practise we will proue by the practise of the chiefe Doctours in Gods Church , for by this did the ancient Fathers expound many places and conuince many Heretikes . By this practise admitting the lapsed to pennāce , did Epiphanius conuince the Nouatians who reiected them . By this practise , of saying Glory be to the Father , the Sonne , and the holy Ghost , did S. Basil conuince Origen about the deity of the holy Ghost , vrging his owne practise with the rest , against Origens owne doctrine against the rest . By this practise of baptizing in the name of the Father , the Sonne , & the holy Ghost , did Theodoret conuince Arius , who denyed the equality of the Sonne with the Father . By this practise of exorcising , & breathing vpon Infants in the Sacramēt of Baptisme , did S. Augustine affirme the Bishops of Palestine to haue expounded that of Rom. 5. in whome all sinned , of originall sinne , deriued from Adam by propagation , not imitation only . By this same practise of the Church praying for the conuersion of Infidels , and perseuerance of the faythfull , did he proue against the same Pelagians , grace of predestination and perseuerance . By the same practise did he reconcile those places of Scripture , of eating all that is set before vs , and of not eating with sinners . And to omit many other , by the same practise of the Church , not rebaptizing them baptized by Heretikes , did he refuse to adhere to S. Cyprian and his opinion , and confuted him , and all the Bishops of Africa , Cappadocia , Bythinia , and the rest , who maintained the contrary . And to conclude , by this practise , which he had learned publikly Eusebius , did also alleadge Iustinus , Miltiades , Tatian , Clemens , Irenaeus , Meliton , and others against Artemon . The same that did these Fathers , did also the generall Councels . The first Councell of Nice , by the testimonyes which they had from the Fathers ( witnes Athanasius ) did decree against Arius . The Councell of Ephesus following the confessions of the Fathers ( sayth it selfe ) and alleadging ( sayth Vincent Lyr. ) in particuler , Most of the East and VVest Doctours as Maisters , Confessours , witnesses , Iudges , held their doctrine , followed their counsell , belieued their testimony , obeyed their iudgment , and so pronounced their sentence of fayth against Nestorius . The Councell of Calcedon , following ( sayth it selfe ) the holy Fathers , the faith of the Fathers , the exposition of the Fathers , doth determine what is pious and Catholike fayth , against Eutiches . The sixth generall Councell ( witnesse both the letters of Pope Agatho , and the Synode it selfe ) doth produce the testimonyes of Fathers for the exposition of scripture , and thereby condemned the Monothelites . The seauenth generall Councell , and the second of Nice doth the same , witnesse the letters of Pope Adrian , against the Image-breakers . And the Councell of Vienna , witnesse the letters of Pope Clement , in their definitions . So that all antiquity , whether in priuate disputations , or in publike definitions , hath alwayes vsed the testimony of Fathers , as a meane in declaring the authenticall sense of scripture , against Heretikes . The fourth , and most infallible meane of expounding the Scripture , is a Councell either generall , or prouinciall confirmed by a generall , in which whatsoeuer is not obiter , by the way , nor as a proofe only , but on set purose , and as a conclusion or definition deliuered and defined , that is without all question or examination , to be receaued as a certaine , infallible , and authenticall sense of scripture . Which ( to omit all testimonies before cyted for the authority of Councels ) is proued by the practise of the faythfull in all Councels ; for in the Nicen Councell were many places of scriptures for proofe of the consubstantiality of Christ produced and discussed , and the Orthodoxe Fathers vrged and pressed diuers Texts of the same . The Arians answered and interpreted them , and vrged likwise many against the same . The conclusion was , the Fathers of the Councell preuailed , and concluded both the doctrine of Christs diuinity , & the sense of the places of Scripture alleadged for it . This definition was to all posterity so forcible , that though the Arians vsed all force of temporall power , ( which afterward was wholy for them ) though they summoned ( as Athanasius saith ) aboue ten Coūcels or Conuenticles against that one ; though they sought in a Councell at Hierusalem to restore their Bishops deposed , and in a Councell at Antioch to bring in a new forme of faith couched in words , not vnlike to the Nicene forme ; and in a Councell at Smirna did affirme craftily the Sonne to haue beene before his mother , and before all times , and not a creature like to others ; though in the Councell at Ariminum they deceaued many Catholicke Bishops , and cunningly obtruded 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , like substance , for the same substance , which in greek differed only in a letter ; though they sent Legates into Italy , France , and al places with faire shewes and promises of vnion of subscribing , and of submitting themselues : ( but cunningly and disemblingly , as the Protestants did at the first , and chiefly Melanchton & Bucer , about Transubstantiation ) yet to all posterity and succeeding ages those places of scripture haue euer beene receaued and beleiued in that sense which the Councell then interpreted , and vrged them : so that , that Councel hath beene a rule euer since for the exposition of them , to all faithfull and true belieuers in Christ . In like manner in the Councell of Ephesus , hauing discussed diuers places before controuerted , whether they were spoken of the natures or persons of Christ ; resolued that they were to be vnderstood of plurality of natures , not persons in Christ . And though Nestorius , the eloquent Patriarch of Constantinople , and many Bishops with him , withstood the Councell ; and though Theodoret , the most learned Catholicke Bishop of that age , long opposed S. Cyrill about the same ; yet the authority of the Councell so far preuailed both then and euer since , that all faithfull euer after haue alwayes receaued , & expounded them in the same sense , as true , and condemned the contrary as false . And the like might be produced of other places for the humanity of Christ , against the Manichees and Apollinarists . For his two natures against the Eutichians and Monothelites . For the holy Ghost against the Macedonians & Eunomians . And so for transubstantiation against Berengarius , and the Sacramentaries , which for breuity are omitted . And thus much of these foure rules or meanes , to wit , 1. The rule of Faith. 2. The practise of the Church . 3. The consent of Fathers : and 4. The decrees of Councels , by which the Pastours and Prelates of Gods Church are to be directed , and vpon which we may infallibly rely for any true , certaine , authenticall , & infallible sense of scripture . There be other helps which are good and profitable , as the consideration of the antecedents and consequences of places , the conference of one place with another , the obseruation of Scripture-phrases , and the skill & examination of the originall texts : but because they are neither certaine nor infallible , but only probable , yea often doubtfull , and somtimes deceitfull , nor yet proper and peculiar to Christians , but cōmon to Iewes , Pagans , Heretiks , and all sortes , and also not to our purpose for the present ; therfore we will omit them , and shew , that the priuate spirit , which the Protestants most insist vpon , and which we vndertake to confute , neither is , nor can be any certaine and infallible meanes of interpreting scripture , as they do both in doctrine and pactise mantaine . That the priuate spirit cannot haue this infallible authority , and be this infallible meanes . SECT . II. THESE being supposed for the finding out the authority certaine , and meanes necessary , for true interpretation of holy scripture ; it remaines to be proued that the priuate spirit of euery particular man , neither hath in it any certainty or authority , nor yet can be a fit meanes vpō which any certaine and authenticall exposition of scripture can be grounded . Which is to be performed two wayes . 1. By reasons drawne from the property and condition of the holy scripture , and the sense and meaning of it . 2. By reasons drawne from the property and condition of the priuate spirit , and the vncertainty , and deceitfulnes of it . SVBDIV. 1. By reasons drawne from the nature of holy Scripture , which is to be expounded . FIrst therefore for the holy Scripture , such is the difficulty of it ( which ariseth partly from the ambiguity of the words including diuers significations , partly from the fecūdity of the significatiōs affording multiplicity of senses , partly from the profundity of the matter inuolued in misteries obscure and exceeding our capacity ) such , I say , is the difficulty of the scripture which aryseth out of these grounds that no priuate man , nor any priuate spirit of any man , can secure himselfe of the certainty of any , much lesse of all of them . For if we respect the words and text of scripture , this spirit cannot vpon any ground assure any man , that either this booke rather then another , is the diuine word of God ; or of this booke , that this is the true and complete Canon ; or of this Canon , that this is the first and originall text ; or of this text that it is the right & authenticall translation ; or of this translation , that any one , rather thē another , is the true and Canonical sense ; or of these senses , that one more then other containes all articles and points necessary to saluation ; all which are yet necessary to be expounded . This spirit cannot expresse and assure what booke is Canonicall , and what not . It cannot accord the Lutherans and Caluinists , whether the Epistle to the Hebrewes of Iames , 2. of Peter , the 2. and 3. of Iohn ; nor the Catholikes and Protestants , whether the bookes of Machabees , Toby , Iudith , Hester &c. be canonicall or not . It cā giue no reason why there should be admitted into the Canon of scripture , the Gospels of Mathew , Marke , Luke , and Iohn , and not the Gospels of Thomas , Nathanael , Matthias , Thadaeus , Bartholomew , Iames , Iohn &c Andrew , Paul , Nicodemus , the Hebrews , the Egiptiās , with that of Peter , or the Nazarits . It can giue no reason , why the Epistles of S. Paul , Iames , Iohn , Iude , & Peter should be admitted , and why not those of Barnabas , of Luke , & the rest of S. Peter , & of S. Paul , that to the Laodiceans , the 3. to the Corinthians , & the 3. to the Thessalonians . It can giue no reason , why the Acts writ by S. Luke should be admite●d , and not the Acts writ by Peter & by Paul , and by Andrew , Thomas , Iohn , Philip , and Matthias , nor the Periods of Paul & Thecla , nor the Constitutions of the Apostles , or the booke of Hermes , or Enoch ; why the Apocalyps of S. Iohn should be amittted , & not the Apocalyps of S. Peter , Paul , Thomas , Stephen , Elias , nor the death of our Lady , the circuite of S. Iohn , the sentences of Bartholomew , the ascension of Esie : all which haue beene extant , and by some challenged as Canonicall , as may be seene in Doctour Stapleton . It cannot resolue , and assure what bookes were originally writ in Hebrew , what in the Chaldean , what in the Greeke , or Latine tongue ; who they were that writ the bookes of the old Testament , and whether they be the same which were first written , and the same sound , and vncorrupted . Whether this Hebrew text be the same , either in Character or letter ( of which is question ) or in wordes ( of which many doubt ) which was first written . What is the sense , signification , phrase , or stile of any Hebrew word . Whether the Greeke of the Septuaginte , which the Apostles followed , be sound and incorrupted , and to be preferred before the Hebrew . Whether the ancient Latin vulgar , or others of later translation , as of Erasmus , Luther , Oecolampadius , Bibliander , Beza , Castalio , Tremelius , and others , be to be followed . Whether of any English translations , the Catholike translation of the Rhemist , or the Protestants of Tindall , of King Edward , of the Bishops , of Geneua , or of King Iames , are to be receaued as true , & which is to be rejected as false . None of these can the priuate spirit in euery ordinary man , nor yet in the learned Protestant certainly decide , and resolue . It cannot satisfy , and assure when the wordes are in the literall or mysticall sense to be vnderstood . And for the literall , when it passeth from speaking of thinges carnall , to thinges spirituall , from temporal to eternall , from the kingdome of Israell , to the kingdome of Christ , as often in the Psalmes and Prophets it doth . As for exāple , from the Kings of Syria and Israell , to our B. Lady & (a) Christ . From the King of Babylon to (b) Lucifer . From Salomon to (c) Christ . From the barly Bread , to the sacramentall (d) Bread. And for the mysticall sense , when it is to be vnderstood morally for manners , when allegorically of Christ , or the Church militant , when anagogically , of glory , or the Church triūphant . When the same wordes beare a proper , and when a figuratiue sense ; and of the figuratiue sense , when the figure is Synecdoche , the part for the whole . When Metonimya the signe or cause for the effect . When it is Catechresis , by which the inuentour of a thing is called Father , Cittyes are called Daughters , posterity is called House &c. When by Hiperbole or exageration the whole world , is put for much , all for many . When by Liptote , or diminution , Idols are called vaine thinges , ●oxious , vnprofitable . When by Analoge , one person , tyme , number , gender , or signification is set for another . When by Hend●adis , two thinges are put for one , as signes and tymes , for signes of tymes . When by Prolepsis or anticipation , places & citties are named by names , which afterward were giuē them . When by Analoge or mutation , one sense , as seeing , is set for another , as hearing , tasting &c. When by Hetorosis , the abstracte , as abomination , for the concrete , as abominable . By Haebraisme , causalites or similituds ar omitted , tenses are changed , persons or matters are supposed : when an occasion is set downe for a cause , the euent for the effect , the diuel for sinne , eternity for a long time . When sinne is meant for sinne it selfe , or for a sacrifice or punishment of sinne , God for an angell , a desire , of doing for the deed , an act , as of seeing , for the obiect , of feare , for the thing , or person feared . When lawes are called by names of precepts , statutes , iustice , iudgement , testimonies , or testamēt . When works of the law of nature , or of faith , are tearmed only works or faith . When Christ is taken for the person of Christ the head , or for the body of Christ the Church , or for both . When father is meant essentially for God , or personally for the first person only . When by the Church is meant the Church militant or triumphant ; the whole body , or principal members . When Predestination is to glory , or to grace . When obduration is actiue by our selues , or permissiue by God. When Christian liberty , is for liberty from sinne , or misery frō the law of Moyses , or Christ , or from obedience to Princes or Prelates &c. All which and many more are difficulties vsuall , and controuerted in the scripture both of the old and new Testament . This priuate spirit in euery man cannot explicate when the figure is not only in the words , but in the matter ; when one thing is a figure of another , as the paschall lambe , of Christ , the red sea , of baptisme , the māna , of the Eucharist , mount Sion of the Church ; or when one thing is a figure of many things , as Ionas of Christ and the Iewes ; the rocke , of the baptisme of the faithfull , and the punishment of the vnfaithfull ; the flood of Noe of baptisme , and of damnation . When one and the same thing is a figure in one sense , not in an other , as the fornicating wife of Osee , was of the Iewes , as she sinned in fornication before mariage , not as she liued chast after mariage . This spirit cannot explicate in euery one many seeming contradictions ; as that (a) the sonne shall not beare the iniquity of the father , and (b) that God doth visit the iniquity of the fathers vpon the Children to the third , and fourth generation . That (c) the gifts of God are without repentance , and (d) God repented that he made Saul King. That (e) In the Arke was nothing els but two Tables of stone , and (f) In the arke were the pitcher of manna , the rod of Aaron , and the Tables . That (g) Do not answere a foole according to his folly , and (h) answer a foole according to his folly . That ( i ) God made not death , and (k) life and death are of God. That (l) The disciples should take nothing in the way , not a rodde , and (m) should take nothing in the way but a rodde . That (n) If I giue testimony of my selfe my testimony is not true , and (o) If I do giue testimony of my selfe my testimony is true . That (p) Mary came to the monument when it was yet darke , and (q) She came when the sunne was risen . That (r) A man is iustified by faith without works , and (s) A man is iustified by works , and not by faith . That ( t ) If I did please men I should not be the seruant of Christ , (t) and (u) I please al men in all things . That (w) S. Pauls companions at his conuersion with many others did heare a voice , and (x) did not heare a voice . All which , with many more , many very learned , both ancient , as S. Augustine , and moderne , as diuers Interpreters haue with great paines , in great volumes , laboured to reconcile . This spirit cannot vnfould many bookes , Chapters , and places in scripture most difficult , as the first Chapter of Genesis about the creation of the world , the bookes of Kings , Paralipomenon , and the Acts of the Apostles ▪ about Genealogies , and reignes of Kinges . The Prophesy of Daniel about the seauenty weekes . Of Ezechiel about the Temple . Of S. Iohn in the Apocalips , about the Angels , the seales , the trumpets , the phyals , the dragon , the whore , and the rest ; in which , saith S. Hierome , are as many misteries as words . If one should aske this spirit in euery ordinary Protestant , how it will explicate and reconcile Moyses , who according to the Hebrew and vulgar edition , omits Cainam betweene Arphaxad & Sala , and with him 130. yeares in the genealogy of Adam , with S. Luke who folowing the greek of the Septuaginte doth adde Cainā . How it will accord the Hebrew text , which accounts but 292. yeares from Noe to Abraham , with the Septuaginte who account 942. yeares , adding more then the hebrew , 100. yeares almost to euery generation or person . How it will accord the hebrew text which from Adam to Noe reckons vp but 1656. yeares , with the greeke of the Septuaginte which reckons vp 2242. yeares , somtimes adding , somtimes detracting from the former . How it will make an agreement betwixt the history of Moyses in Genesis , and the relation of S. Luke in the Acts. 1. in Abrahās departure out of Haram , Moyses , by computation , affirming it to haue beene before the death of his Father Thare ( for Abraham (a) was 75. years old , when he departed , and was borne in the (b) 70. yeare of his Father Thare , who liued (c) 205. and so Abraham departed out of the Land when Thare his Father was 141. yeares old , that is 60 yeares before he dyed ) and yet S. Steuen sayth (d) he departed after Thare his fathers death . 2. In the tyme of the Israelites mansion in Aegypt , Moyses by computation affirming it to haue beene but 215. yeares ( which S. Paul (e) confirms accounting from the promise to Abraham , till the departure out of Aegypt , but 430. years , that is , 215. before the entrāce , and 215. after the entrance , till their departure ; and yet S. Luke (f) and S. Steuen affirme , from the entrance till the departure to haue beene 400. 3. In the number of persons that entred into Aegypt with Iacob , Moyses saying that they were but (g) 66. or (h) 70. and S. Steuen and S. Luke saying that they were (i) 75. 4. About the buriall of Iacob , & in this , 1. in the place , Moyses saying it was in Hebron ouer against (k) Mambre , and S. Luke and S. Steuen saying it was in (l) Sichē . 2. In the seller of the field or sepulcher , Moyses affirming Abraham to haue bought it of Ephrem the sonne of (m) Seor ; and S. Luke and S. Steuen of the sonnes of (n) Hemor : Which Hemor , sayth (o) Moyses , sold it to Iacob , not Abraham , and was according to Moyses the Father of Sichem ; not , as S. Luke and S. Steuen say , the sonne of (p) Sichem . 3. In the buyer of the same sepulcher , Moyses affirming that (q) Iacob , S. Luke that Abraham bought it of them . 4. In the price of the sayd sepulcher or field , Moyses affirming Iacob to haue bought it for a 100. (r) Lambes , or to haue got it by the sword , or bow from the (s) Amorrhoites ; S. Luke and S. Steuen affirming him to haue bought it for siluer . If one should aske , how the bookes of the Kinges and Paralipomenon , and the Acts , can by this spirit be explicated , and made agree . 1. In the yeares of Saul , who 1. Reg. 13.1 . is sayd , to haue beene a child of two yeares old when he began to raigne , and to haue raigned two yeares ; and yet 1. Reg. 9.2 . he is sayd before his raigne to haue been higher by the shoulders vpward then any in Israell ; and Act. 15.12 . to haue reigned 40. yeares . 2. About the computation of tyme , from the diuision of the land vnder Iosue to Samuel , which according to S. Luke and S. Paul in his speach in the Synagogue at Antioch , Act. 13.20 . according to the Greeke and Protestant edition , are 450. yeares ; but according to the computation made by raigne of the Iudges , are but 345. For 3. Reg. 6.1 . the Temple was built 480. yeares after the departure out of Aegypt , from which if there be deduced 50. from the departure till the diuision of the land , and also 40. of Samuel and Sauls raigne , & 40. of Dauids , togeather with 4. of Salomons raigne ( which in all make 134. as they are collected out of Scripture ) there remaines from the departure out of Aegypt , till the building of the Temple , not 450. years , as S. Luke relats , but only 345. 3. About the raigne of Ioram King of Iuda , and Ochozias his sonne after him ; for Ioram began to raigne when he was 32. years old , & raigned 8. years , which (a) for his whole life is 40. & yet Ochozias his sonne , who succeeded him , is sayd to haue beene 42. yeares old when he began to raigne , 2. Para. 22.2 . by which he ( being 42. yeares old when his Father dyed , being but 40. ) should be two years elder then his Father , who begat him ; a question to S. Hierome inexplicable . 4. About the raigne of Ioachim , or Iechonias King of Iuda , who is sayd , 2. Paral. 36.9 . to haue beene but eight yeares old , and 4. Reg. 24.8 . to haue beene eighteen years old , both of them when he began to raigne . 5. About Ioram King of Israel , who is sayd to haue begun his raigne , 4. Reg. 1.17 . in the second yeare of Ioram King of Iuda , and yet 4. Reg. 3.1 . to haue begun the same in the eighteen yeare of Iosaphat , who was Iorams Father , and raigned 25. yeares . 6. About the supputation of tyme , as it is counted by the raigne of the Kings of Iuda , and of Israel ; for from the beginning of the kingdome of Israel in the first of Roboam King of Iuda , till the end of the same in the sixth of Ezechias , when Samaria was taken , are 260. yeares , according to the raigne of the Kinges of Iuda ; and yet in the same tyme , according to the raigne of the Kinges of Israel , are only 240. yeares . To all which , if we adde the difficult places , which according to S. Peter , are in the Epistles of S. Paul , as for example , how are to be interpreted that of 1. Cor. 3.11 . Gold , siluer , hay , stubble , the day of our Lord , fire ; and to be saued by the fire . That of 1. Cor. 15.29 . How to be baptized for the dead . That of Hebr. 6.4 . It is impossible for those that fall , to repent . If we adde the difficult places , which in the Euangelists are hard , as for example in S. Marke , who cites the Prophet Esay for Malachy . In S. Matthew , who cites Ieremy for Zachary . In S. Luke , who adds a generation of Cainam to the same , cyted by Moyses , and makes 40. Generations from Dauid to Christ , where S. Matthew makes but 28. In S. Iohn , who maks the day of Christs Passion , the day before the festiuall day ; the rest of the Euangelists , the day of the feast . If we add the difficult places of which many holy and learned men of ancient time doubted , & sent for explication , some to S. August . as Marcellinus , a Noble man , and Martyr , Volusianus gouernour of Rome , and Paulinus , Simplicianus , Euodius , and Honoratus , all Bishops . Some to S. Hierome , as Marcella , and Principia , Suna , and Fratella , Hebidia and Algasia noble and religious women ; as Vitalis , Dardanus , Euagrius , & Damasus holy and learned Bishops . And lastly , if we adde all those places , which all ancient and moderne Heretikes haue in so many articles of fayth abused and corrupted for the establishing of their new inuented heresies : If I say we adde all these to the former , it will by them appeare , that the priuate spirit in euery man can be neither a competent , nor yet a sufficient meanes to expound and interprete the true & certaine sense of Scripture , neither , in places difficult to be vnderstood , nor in points necessary to be belieued . And this is the first kind of reason , drawne from the nature of scripture , against the priuate spirits interpretation of it . SVBDIV. 2. By reasons drawne from the priuate spirit , which should expound Scripture . SEcondly , other reasons are drawne from the nature and condition of the priuate spirit , which , whether it be in a priuate person who wants lawfull ordination and authority , or in publike Doctour , Pastour , or Bishop who diuided by heresy or schisme doth not conforme his spirit to the comon spirit of Gods Church , and generall rule of Fayth , yet that it cannot be a competent Iudge of fayth , and decider of controuersies , is proued by these reasons . First , because this priuate spirit is excluded as vnable and vnfit to interprete the scripture , and that by scripture it selfe , for S. Peter hauing commended the propheticall word , or the wordes of Scripture made by the Prophets , as being a candle shining in a darke place , doth giue this Caueat , as principally to be vnderstood , that the sense of it , is not to be made by any priuate interpretation ; that is , though the scripture be a light , yet as it is a light not to Gentils , Iewes , or Infidels , who vnderstand it not ; so it is not a light to Heretikes , who by the priuate spirit make a priuate interpretatiō of it : & why ? Because by mans will Prophesy was not at any tyme brought , but the holy men of God spake inspired by the holy Ghost ; that is , as the holy men of God , the Apostles , inspired by the holy Ghost , spake and dictated the word of God , when it was made ; so the interpreters of the same word , ought not to bring in any exposition of the same word of God , vpon their owne will and sense , but vpon the inspiration of the same holy Ghost , when by them it is interpreted : so that we should receaue the sense of scripture from the same spirit , from which we receaued the text of Scripture . As therefore no priuate spirit but one and the same spirit of the Prophets , and Apostles of Christ made the scripture ; so no priuate spirit , but the common spirit of Pastours and Prelates of Christs Church , should determine and iudge of the sense of Scripture . Of which place , and others , see more in the first Chapter . Secondly , because as truth and faith is not priuate to one , nor singular in any , but common to all , and generally receaued by all the faithfull ( for so saith S. Augustine ; Thy truth , O Lord , is neither myne , nor this mans , or that mans , but all mens whom thou callest publickly to the Communion of it , terribly admonishing vs not to haue it priuate , least we be depriued of it ; for whosoeuer will challenge that as proper to himselfe which is giuen , as common to all , and will haue that only to himselfe which is for all men , that man is driuen from the common to his owne , that is , from truth to falshood : ) so also the spirit of truth is not priuate to any one , but common to all the faithfull ; for if the spirit of the teacher be not common with the spirit of all teachers , it is not a spirit as it ought to be , which is one , keeping an vnity of spirit in the bond of (a) peace , & making mē of one mind , in one spirit labouring together for the faith of the (b) ghospel ; but it is a spirit of dissentiō (c) which comes in his owne name (d) , speaketh lies of it selfe (e) , leadeth disciples after it selfe , and seeketh , as a thiefe , to kill and destroy (f) . And if the spirit of the hearer be not conformable to the teacher , then it is not a spirit of God , nor of truth , because he who is borne of God , heareth the voice of the spirit (g) : and to heare the voice of vs (h) saith S. Iohn , that is , of the Pastour , is a signe to discerne who knows God , and who hath the spirit of truth , not falshood . But if he , on the contrary , do follow a stranger (i) ; do heare the voice of strangers (k) ; & do harken to a Prophet who ariseth and saith , let vs follow strang Gods , whom thou knowest (l) not , that is , new Pastours vnknowne who they are , or whence they come ; it is a signe of a spirit which followes not God , nor is directed in truth . Therfore the spirit of God , is not a spirit priuate and singular by it selfe : but a spirit common and generall to all the faithfull , vniting the sheepheard with the flocke , and the flocke with the sheepheard , both in the fold of Iesus Christ , in vnity of one spirit , and faith . Thirdly , Because this priuate spirit is not only euill , but also most vncertaine and fallible : for it is vncertaine in whom it is , whether in Luther , Caluin , Seruetus , or Rotmā , and why not as well in Bellarmine , as in any of them ? It is vncertaine to him , who imagines he hath it , whether it be the spirit of God , of nature , or of Sathan ; and most vncertaine & altogeather vnknowne to any , but him who challengeth it . It is vncertaine whether that sense it suggests be the certaine meaning of the holy Ghost , or the inuention of ones owne braine . It is vncertaine whether those interpreters of scriptures which follow it , and others who follow them , as Caluin , Luther , Osiander , Beza , or others , do expound the scripture in the sense of the holy Ghost , or of their owne . It could not accord the Lutheran Deuines of Saxony in the Conference at Altemburge 1568. whether the scripture was to be receiued as interpreted by Luther only , as the Duks Deuines of Iene & Lipsia prescribed ; or as by Luther and Melācthon also , as the Electours Deuines of Wittemberge resolued . It could not agree Luther & Melancthon , with Zwinglius & Oecolampadius at Marspurge , 1529. about the sense of these words , Hoc est corpus meum , whether they are meant properly or figuratiuely . It could not combine in vnity at Wormes 1557. the twelue Catholicke Doctours , with the twelue Lutheran , about many points of controuersy ; nor the Lutheran Doctours among themselues , of whom seauen ( the maior part ) excluded fiue ( the lesser ) that is Amsdorpius , Gallus , and others the rigid Lutherans . It cannot pacify to this day the dissentions about the sense of scripture betweene the Lutherans , Swinglians , Caluinists , Vbiquitaries , Osiandrians , Swenk feldians , Trinitarians , Puritans , Familists , Anabaptists , and others in number infinite , and in contention vnplacable . So vncertaine it is in all , & so vncertaine it leaues all . Fourthly , Because it is not only false and vncertaine in expounding the scripture : but also it is opposit to the spirit and iudgement of the whole Church , of all generall Councels , and of all auncient Fathers , reiecting and condemning them , and preferring it selfe in euery preacher , or Parochian before them . It will in euery vnlearned Protestant , with Caluin , examine all the spirits of all men ▪ according to the rule of the word of God : it selfe , I say , will examine and iudge them . It will , with Luther , affirme , and stand to it also , that it will permit none to be iudges , but all to be obedient to it . It will , with Whitaker , resolue , that all iudgment of Fathers , Councels , and Church is only humane , and only its owne is diuine , of which contempt of Fathers and Councels , see the first Part , Chap. 5. Fifthly , Because it is not only false , fallible , & opposite to the spirit of Gods Church : but is the very author and supporter of all heresies , as Stapleton well notes , saying : Out of this priuate spirit , to which they stand stifly for the exposition of scripture , haue issued and flowed all the stincke of heresies and new opinions which haue infected the whole world . And indeed , as euery hereticke diuided himselfe from the Church , and forsooke the spirit of it ; so by his new spirit he inuented a new heresy of his owne , and sought to draw people after him . All which both concerning heresies & rebellions , shal in the third Part at large be demonstrated . Sixtly , Because all the partes and properties of an infallible Iudge are wanting in this spirit , as shall appeare in the next Chapter . And thus much against the priuat spirits authority of expounding scriptures , by reasons drawne from the obscurity , fecundity , and profundity of scripture , and from the falsity , fallibility , and vncertainty of this spirit . Out of which it doth follow , first ; that since the Protestants build their saluation only vpon faith , and their faith only vpon the scripture , and the scripture and the sense of it only vpon the spirit , which is so vncertaine , fallible , and doubtfull , therefore their whole faith , and state of saluation is very vncertaine , fallible , and doubtfull , as builded vpon a ground so vncertaine , fallible , and doubtfull . 2. It followes , that they who in shew rely so much vpon scripture , who extoll it so much , read it so diligently , & seeme to be so cunning in it , and to build so much on it ; do not indeed rely , & build vpon the scripture , but vpon their owne spirit or conceit , by which they set vpon the scripture what sense they please , and draw the sense to what doctrine they please , and make the doctrine to serue to what times and turns , to what ends and vses they please . 3. It followes , that the Catholikes , whom the Protestantes so much accuse of neglect of scripture , do more solidly & safely rely on it then the Protestants do , and do with more security and certainty ground their faith vpon it then they do : for the Catholikes receiue the scripture as the word of God , as much as they , & more parts of it then they ; they reuerence it as much as they , and haue kept it from corruption longer then they . They ground their faith and beliefe vpon it as strongly as they , & did the same before it was knowne to them , yea deliuered it to them , and to many mo besides them . For the true sense and right vnderstanding of it , they do not rely vpon euery mans priuate spirit or conceit as they do , but vpon the iudgement of the Church , infallibly assisted by the holy ghost ; vpon the testimony of the catholike and apostolicke rule of faith ; vpon the conformity of the auncient practise and obseruation of the Church ; vpon the generall consent of the holy and learned Fathers and doctors of auncient time ; vpon the infallible decrees of general and oecumenicall Councels ; all of impartiall and authenticall authority , which they do not . And by this , Catholiques are more secure of the true sense of scripture , then they ; haue their faith better grounded vpon the scripture , then they ; and haue their spirit better warranted by God , more secured that it is from God , and surer combined with the spirit of the auncient Catholicke and Apostolicke Church , with the spirit of the holy and learned Doctours and Saintes of God , with the spirit of the generall and receiued Councels of Gods Church ; none of which they haue . And by this we haue our beliefe grounded vpon a certaine , infallible , & authenticall sense of scripture , which they haue not . And thus much of this priuate spirit , that it cannot be a fit , and certaine Rule , or meanes truly , and infallibly to interprete the holy scripture . THE PRIVATE SPIRITS AVTHORITY To iudge Controuersies of Fayth , confuted by Reasons , drawne from the nature of a Iudge of Fayth . CHAP. VI. The properties of a Iudge of Fayth . SECT . I. THOVGH the Iudge of the sense of Scripture , and of controuersies of faith , be all one , and therfore that which hath beene spoken of the one , might also suffice for the other : yet because faith extends it selfe larger then the scripture , & because the true Iudge of faith , from the false , may be the more clearly discerned , & the functiōs of this priuate spirit may be also more plainly confuted ; therfore I adde in this Chaprer these reasons , drawne from the office of a Iudge of Controuersies , to shew the insufficiency of this spirit to be a iudge of thē . In which we may note , for this iudiciary power and authority . 1. What it is , and what properties , and conditions it requires . 2. In whome it is , and who are to exercise this authority . 3. How it is to be ordered , and what rules are to be followed in the exercise of it : which being distinctly and fully considered , the inability , and insufficiency of this spirit , to make a Iudge of faith , will more clearly appeare . First therfore , we may note , that as in a temporall Common-wealth ( where contentions arise , offences are committed , and tittles are questionable ) that besides the lawes established , there are necessary also Iudges to determine causes , to decide titles , and to punish offences : so also in the spirituall Common-wealth of the Church , where controuersies are of a higher nature , questions no fewer in number , and the offences more grieuous in quality , some personall Iudge , or iudges are no lesse , yea more necessary to discerne verity in all doubts , to establish vnity in all contentions , and to punish obstinacy in persons who offend . Some Iudge therfore is necessary , as well in spirituall causes , as in temporall ; as well for matters of doctrine , as of iustice ; and as well in pointes of faith , as of manners . This Iudge , because all faithfull belieuers are obliged to belieue , and obey his sentence as true and iust , though not in consequences , & appendixes of faith , yet in materiall and substantiall foundatitions of faith ; though not in schoole questions , & pulpit conceites which infringe not the solidity of faith , yet in maine articles and principall mysteries of faith , vpon which is cōposed a complet edifice of true religion ; though not in probations , and allegations for the proofe of pointes of faith , yet in the determinations , and conclusions of the points , or articles themselues ; though not in case , when is intended only to confirme the weake , to satisfy the curious , or to confound the proud , yet in case when is intended to condemne any doctrine as heresy vnder anathema , and to declare and define expresly , for the common and publicke good of the whole Church , any verity of doctrine , formerly by the practise of the Church receaued , or by the assent of the faithfull at the least , virtually belieued . Because , I say , all faithfull are obliged to belieue and obey this Iudge , and his sentence in pointes , and articles substantiall , defined , and concluded by sentence definitiue against heresy , for the good of the whole Church ; therfore it is necessary that this Iudge ( vpon whome depends the verity of beliefe , and the saluation , or damnation of so many who by a true , or false faith are saued , or damned ) haue these properties or conditions in him , & in his authority . 1. That he be visible , and manifest in person , so that he may know , and be knowne , heare and be heard , speake and be spoken vnto , and therby haue a publicke Court , giue publick audience , examine publicke causes , & pronounce publicke sentence betweene parties who contend , and in contentions which are debated . 2. That he haue power , and authority , warrant , and commission , to giue Iudgment , pronounce sentence , and to compell parties to obedience , and performance . 3. That he haue warrant of infallibility in this his sentence , that he cannot erre , or determine errour , deceaue , or be deceaued in this his verdit , corrupt , or be corrupted by partiality in his iudgment . All which , are as it were essentially necessary for this iudge ; for if he be not publicke & knowne in person , others cannot haue accesse to him , nor he vnderstand the causes of others ; if he be not certaine and infallible in his sentence , he cannot determine matters of certainty , nor can others be secured by him ; if he want authority , and power to oblige , and compell , he cannot end the controuersy , and establish peace , and vnity in the Church , which is the end of his iudgment . Further , because this Iudge is to haue this infallible authority , and that all are obliged to rely vpon him , and his iudgment , that he may the more securly proceed in his iudgment , and others more confidently rely vpon it ; therfore he must haue some Rule likwise infallible , and certaine , by which he may be directed in his iudgment ; and some solid foundation , vpon which he may build his definitiue sentence . This rule , or foundation , because it is to be a rule & ground of iudgment , and that for persons in number so infinit , and for causes in substance so important , therfore it can require no lesse then these and such like properties , for the solidity of it , and the security of iudgment by it . In respect of it selfe . 1. That it be so certaine & infallible that it can neither deceaue , or be deceaued . 2. That it be so continued , and not interrupted , that it cannot decay , or perish . 3. That it be so firme , and immutable , that it cannot be changed , or corrupted . In respect of the persons whom it is to direct . 4. That it be so knowne and visible , that it may be discerned by all sortes who haue need of it . 5. So markable , & notable that it may be a signe distinctiue , to distinguish true , from false beleeuers . 6. So necessary and important that without it , no certainty can be had . 7. So vniuersal & general , that it may satisfy all sortes of people , Iewes , or Infidels , Heretikes , or Catholikes , yong , or old , vnlearned , or learned . In respect of the matter or mysteries which are to be determined . 8. That it be so fundamentall , that it be contained among the chief articles of the Creed , or plainly expressed in scripture . 9. So sufficient , that it be able to explicate & determine all articles and doubtes in religion . 10. So complet , that it containe virtually , & be able to resolue plainly all questions , and conclusions of Faith which may at any time vpon any occasion arise . All which are necessary for such a rule , and foundation , vpon which so important a matter , as faith and religion , is grounded . And this is the first thing to be obserued for the properties , and conditions both of the Iudge , and his rule of faith . The whole body of the Church cannot be this Iudge . SECT . II. SECONDLY , We may note , that this infallible authority , to iudge of controuersies of faith , is giuen , neither to the whole body , and congregation of the Church of God , as the rigid Lutherans with Brentius do hould ▪ nor to the secular Princes and Parlamentes , as all the Lutherans at first , and the State-Protestants of England do yet defend ; nor to the lay-people , and priuate persons , as Caluin , and the Caluinists do maintaine ; nor yet is it residing in the wordes , and text or scripture , as the ordinary preachers pretend : but only is giuen to the Pastours , and Prelates of the Church of Christ , who are lawfully , by authority from Apostolicall succession , ordained , and Catholickly continue , without diuision of heresy or schisme , in the same ; and among them , principally to the chiefe head , and Pastour , the successor of Peter , and Bishop of Rome . All which , concerning euery one , shall be briefly proued . First therefore , although the whole body of the Church collected , haue the infallible assistance of the holy Ghost that it cannot erre , or be deceaued in faith ; yet hath it not the same assistance , that it may , & ought to be iudge & determiner of faith . For as in a naturall body the soule doth informe and giue life to the whole body , and euery member of it ; but doth not discourse , and giue vse of reason to the whole , or euery part , but only to the head : so the spirit of God assistes the whole Church with the priuiledge of freedome from errour in faith , but doth not likewise giue to it the priuiledg● of authority to teach , and iudge of faith , and direct others in the same ; for which cause God hath giuen a measure of donation , diuisions of graces , and ministrations , and made some , not al , Apostles , Doctours , & Prophets , that some may rule , & others be ruled ; some teach , and others be taught ; some be superiours to iudge , and direct , others be inferiours to be iudged and directed ; and so an order , and subordination , a peace , and vnity , may be obserued and kept in the whole body among the members of Christs Church . Whereof see more in the next fourth Section . Secular Princes cannot be this Iudge . SECT . III. THIRDLY , That this infallible authority is not in secular Princes , or their Assemblies , and Parlaments , either as particuler members of the Church , against Melancthon , or as Princes , and Superiours among the rest , against Brentius , so , that they can , and may lawfully , and infallibly iudge of Controuersies , make ecclesiasticall lawes , giue authority to preach , and prescribe a forme of doctrine , a manner of seruice , and an order of Sacraments and sacrifice ; though it be largely by many proued , against the supremacy of Princes in causes Ecclesiasticall , and requires a treatise more large , yet in briefe it shall by these reasons be proued . First , because Kinges and Princes are in the Church of God , and spirituall affaires , as sheep , to be ruled and ordered ; not as sheepheardes , to rule and gouerne : they are (a) Lambes to be fed by Peter ; (b) Sheep of the fold of Christ ; Members of the Church of God , and seruants of the family of Christ . Thus did the ancient and holy Fathers freely tell , and admonish them , and the Christian and good Emperours themselues acknowledged it . S. Gregory Nazianzen (a) told Valentinian , That the law of Christ did subiect them ( Emperours ) to his power , and Tribunall , and that they were holy sheep of his holy fold . S. Ambrose (b) told Theodosius the Great , that he was a sonne of the Church , and that a good Emperour is within , not aboue the Church . Theodoret (c) sayes of Constantine the Great , that as a louing sonne , he did propose busines to the Bishops and Priests , as Fathers . Constantine himselfe cōfesses , that God gaue Priests power to iudge of Emperours , witnesse (d) Ruffinus : that they were bishops within the Church , he without it , witnes (e) Eusebius . Valentinian the elder confesses , that he , as a laye man , might not interpose himselfe in Church affaires , but the Bishops and Priestes had care of such affaires , witnes (f) Sozom. And that himselfe was to submit himselfe to them , witnes (g) Paulus Diaconus . And Theodosius the Great obeyed S. Ambrose (h) his excommunication , departed out of the Chancell at his command , and cōfessed , that thereby he had learned to know what difference there was betweene an Emperour , and a Bishop , witnes (i) Theodoret , and (k) Nicephorus . Secondly , because the offices of the Bishops and Emperours are diuers , and distinct , the one of bodyes and goods , the other of soules , and fayth ; the one of life , and death for offences against the King , and common-wealth ; the other of sinnes , and sacraments belonging to Gods lawes , & mans conscience ; the one is temporall of the kingdome and common-wealth , the other is spirituall of the Church , & flocke of Christ ; which the hereticall Emperours forgetting , were stoutly and zealously admonished , and reprehended by the holy Bishops vnder them , for the same . As for example Cōstantius the Arian , 1. by Hosius (a) of Corduba , willing him not to medle with Ecclesiasticall affaires , nor to commaund them , but to learne of them ; because to him God had committed the Empire , but to them the Church . 2. By (b) Leontius of Tripolis , because being ruler of military and politicke affaires , he should not rule in thinges that belong only to Bishops . 3. By (c) S. Hilary of Arles , wishing him to writ to Iudges of Prouincies , that they should not presume , or vsurpe to intermedle with the causes of Clergy men . 4. By (d) S. Athanasius of Alexandria , that he , and such who will be Presidents in ecclesiasticall iudgments , who will make the Tribunals of the Court the seales of deciding ecclesiasticall causes , & themselues Princes and Authours of Church affaires , are the abomination of desolation , yea euen Antichrist himselfe . Valentinian the yonger seduced by his wife , was told by (e) S. Ambrose of Milane , That he had no Imperiall right in thinges that are diuine ; for the Court doth belong to the Emperour , but the Church to the Priest . And being called by the Emperour to reason with Auxentius the Arian , he answered : That if a conference was to be made of fayth , it was to be made by the Priestes , as it was vnder Constantine , who prescribed no lawes , but gaue free iudgement to Priests . That it was neuer heard , that in a cause of fayth Lay men did iudge of Bishops . That if we looke into Scripture or ancient tymes , Bishops vsed to iudge of Christian Emperours , not Emperours of Bishops . Thus S. Ambrose imitating S. Athanasius , who sayd : When was it euer heard , that the iudgement of the Church did receaue authority from the Emperour ? Many synods and iudgements haue beene , & yet did neither any Bishops persuade any Emperour any such thing , nor any Prince shew himselfe curious in any Ecclesiasticall affaires . Valens the Arian , was asked by Eulogius the Priest in Edessa , Hath the Emperour the dignity of Priesthood ? we haue a Pastour , whome we must obey . Anastasius the Eutichian , was told by Gelasius the Pope , That though he did rule ouer mē in earthly things yet he did subiect his necke to the Prelates in diuine thinges . Thou knowest that thou oughtest to be ruled , nor to rule in order of religion ; thou knowest that thou art to depend of this iudgement , not they to be brought to thy will. S. Mauritius was admonished by S. Gregory the great , That Priests are as Gods among men , & therefore ought to be honoured of all Kinges . And Michael was let vnderstand the same by the Nicolas 1. Leo the Image-breaker was told by S. Iohn (*) Damascene , That the Church ought to be ruled , not by lawes of Kinges , but by the written , and not written , institutions of Ancestours . And to conclude , S. Iohn Chrysostome sayd freely to his owne Deacon : If any Duke , Consull , or the Emperour himselfe come vnworthily , represse , repell him , thou hast greater power then he . Where we may note , that these Emperous were thus by these Fathers reprehended , for assuming Ecclesiasticall iudgment , either as Heretiks , or as Tyrants ; nor yet for doing it alone without the Bishops , but only and simply as Emperours , who hauing only temporall power , ouer the common-wealth , did assume Ecclesiastical ouer the Church . Which also is further proued by the confession , and practise of the best of the Christian Emperours ; for Constantine the Great acknowledged , that (a) the Bishops had power to iudge him , and when he did iudge of the cause of Caecilianus Bishop of Carthage , he did it so , that he asked pardon of the Bishops for (b) it . Valentinian the elder would haue them to iudge in a cause of fayth and ecclesiasticall order , who are not vnlik either in office or title , that is , Priests of (c) Priests . Marcians commissioners referred themselues to the Councell of Calcedon to be taught in fayth , and himselfe wills that Priests determine what is to be obserued in (d) Religiō . And though he himselfe went to the Councell , yet it was not to determine , but confirme the fayth , not prescribing lawes ( sayth S. Ambrose ) but leauing the Priests free iudgement , and making the Priests themselues Iudges , as he did in the Councell of Aquileia . Theodosius the second sent to the Councell of Ephesus , but not so much as to talke of matters of Fayth , holding it vnlawfull for those who are not of Episcopall order , to medle in Ecclesiasticall affaires . The same did Iustinian in his Constitutions , and Basil in the eight generall Councell . Thirdly , because power not only to preach , but much more to iudge of doctrine of fayth ( for the authority to iudge , is (ç) the strong meat of perfect men , whose senses are exercised to the discerning of good and euill ) was committed to Bishops ( as of greater difficulty then the office or preaching giuen to Priests ) and is a spirituall grace , or guift , giuen by imposition of handes , to spirituall men , according to that of the Apostle : Neglect (a) not the grace that is in thee , which is giuen thee by prophecy , with imposition of the handes , of Priesthood . Therefore as power to minister Sacraments , is proper to Priests : so also to iudge of Controuersies , is proper to Bishops , lawfully ordained by authority , successiuely descending from the Apostles . For which cause , to Priests and Prelates , not to Kings and Princes , it is sayd : Thou (b) shalt seeke the law out of the mouth of the Priest . My (*) wordes shall not depart out of thy mouth , and out of the mouth of thy seed , and out of the mouth of thy seedes seed for euer . I (c) will giue you mouth , and wisedome , which all your aduersaryes shall not be able to resist . It (d) is not you that speak but the spirit of my Father which speaketh in you . He (e) that heareth you , heareth me . He (f) that knoweth God , heareth vs. He (g) that is not of God , heareth vs not , sayth one of the spirituall Pastours ; for which guift , Caiphas prophesy was a guift of his functiō , or priesthood , according to (h) S. Augustine , though his ill life was the cause of ignorāce of what he prophesyed . Lastly , because many inconueniences , and absurdities would follow , if this authority were annexed to the kingly Scepter , not to the priestly function ; for it would follow , that Fayth could not continue one and the same , neither in all persons , nor in all tymes , nor in all Countryes , because Princes , in all tymes and places , are of disposition various ; in iudgement different ; in faction opposite ; and in subordination neither depending one of another , nor alwayes respecting Religion , or Religious persons , more then may besteed them for their temporall and priuate endes , and vses . Wherefore as Ieroboam of old , and Queene Elizabeth of late , did relinquish the old , and introduce a new Religion , for reasons more politicke then diuine , rather to establish their doubtfull titles , then religiously to serue God ; so would Kinges by vertue of this their authority ( if it were in them ) either in policy , or vpon affection , be still altering Religions , and setting vp new , most for their owne endes and dispositions ; by which we should haue as many alterations of Religion , as of Kinges , and as many Churches as are Kingdomes , and as great opposition in Faith , as is in States , and Common-wealthes . All which may appeare by an example in Englād , where while the authority in iudging in matters of faith was in the Prelats , religion continued 900. yeares the same , from Ethelbert till Henry the eight ; but after that power of iudging was assumed to the scepter by King Henry the 8. the supremacy by one & the same King , was in three yeares thrice changed , from the Pope to the Clergy , from the Clergy to the Archbishop , from the Archbishop to the King , and afterwards as many religions were a new broght in as Kings were a new crowned , to wit , one by King Henry , another by King Edward , a third by Queen Mary , a fourth by Queen Elizabeth ; & a fifth of Puritans would haue been vnder the same Queen , if power had not preuented it ; and what may be , yet lies in the power of the King and Parlament . It would also follow that a man should be obliged alwayes to follow the religion of the King , to change with the King , and so should not be obliged to be certaine of any , or to dy , or suffer for any religion , but should belieue and preach , obserue and practice , what the King prescribes , and the Parlament ordaines : all which are against vnity and certainty of al faith and religiō . Lastly , it would follow that for 300. years after Christ , whē the Emperours were pagan and not Christian , either pagans must be iudges and deciders of the true sense of scripture , and of all controuersies of faith , or that there was , for that time , no iudge of them at al : also when Princes become hereticks , as Constantius and Valens did , or Apostata's as Iulian did , that either true Christians should be obliged to obey , and follow Pagans & Apostata's , as iudges and vmpiers of their faith , or else , that they , by falling into heresy or apostacy , should loose their regall power and authority , and subiects should be freed from their duty and obedience to them . None of which our Protestants will admit , as being indeed too too absurd . The Lay-people cannet be this Iudge . SECT IIII. FOVRTHLY , that this infallible authority is not in the lay people , and priuate persons of the Church , is proued . 1. Because they want knowledge , and vnderstanding to discusse , and penetrate , either the articles , which are belieued , or the meanes , for which they are to be belieued , as being , for the most part , men simple , and vnlearned ; for which cause they were neuer admitted to any Councels , as Arbitrators , or Iudges of faith : but alwaies directed by their Pastours in their obedience to faith . 2. Because they haue no warrant , or commission giuen them for this end , either expressed in any Scripture , or approued by any Tradition , or practise of the Church , or mentioned by any testimony of Fathers , or Councels ; therfore are not to assume or exercise it , till they proue it . 3. Because of al sortes they are the most fallible , vncertaine , and vnconstant in their opinions , and practises , and therfore are left alwayes to be ruled , & ordered , as the people are in the temporall common-wealth , & not to rule and gouerne as Magistrates , and Iudges . 4. Because it would follow that all should be Iudges , & Pastours to determine , none should be subiects to obey , or sheepe to be fed ; that the Church gouernment should be Democraticall , of people which of all is the worst ; that euery mā should haue a religion of his owne , without any vnion with any , or subordination to any ; that the people should preach , and minister Sacraments , as well as Priests or Prelates ; should excommunicate , censure , and punish one another , as well as Bishops , & make decrees for faith and manners , as wel as Councels . In respect of all which inconueniences , and absurdities ( which are so many testimonies against this authority of the people ) our Sauiour did speake to the people in parables , (a) and without parables he did not speake to them : but to the Apostles and Pastours (b) he gaue knowledge of the mysteries of the kingdome of heauen . To the people he spake of things easy , and publicke , as their sins , and vices , vertues , & good life ; but to the Apostles ( and that , separated from the people , ) of his death , resurrection , the holy Ghost , the day of iudgment , and such like mysteries . With the people he did conuerse before his death , not after his resurrection ; he (a) manifested not himselfe to all the people , but to the Apostles as Pastours , and witnesses preordained of God ; he appeared after his resurrectiō (b) did eate , and drinke with them , and commaunded them only , not the vulgar sort , (c) to preach to the people . To the people it is said , Obey (d) your Prelats & be subiect to them : but to the Pastours , take (e) heed to the whole flocke , wherin the holy Ghost hath placed you Bishops , to rule the Church of God. To the people it is said , suffer (f) the cockle to grow : but to the Pastours , (g) take away the euil one , from among your selues . To the people it is said , do (h) that which they ( the Pastours ) say : but to the Pastours , He (i) who heareth you , heareth me ; and he (k) that knoweth God heareth vs. By hea●ing of them is knowne which is the spirit of truth , which of errour . Of the people it is said , How shall they belieue him whome they haue not heard , how shall they heare without a preacher ? But of the Pastours , (l) . How shall they preach , vnlesse they be sent ? All which conuince that our Sauiour intended to make the people , not Pastours , but sheep ; not rulers , but subiects ; not iudges to commaund , but seruants to obey , in matters of faith , and religion . The Scripture cannot be this Iudge . SECT . V. FIFTLY , That the scripture cannot be this iudge to determyne and end al controuersies is proued . 1. Because this scripture , in respect of vs , requires a iudge it selfe to determine , and assure vs which is true Canon , true originall text , true translation , true sense , & the rest as before ; therefore to vs it cannot be a iudge . 2. Because all , or the greatest difficulties ; all , or the maynest questions ; and all , o● the hoatest contentiōs which haue passed either among Catholike Doctours , or betweene Catholicks and Hereticks , are about the scripture , and the sense of it , none of which scripture it selfe could euer yet end , and decide without some other iudge and vmpier , plainly to pronounce sentence in the cause ; and immediatly vnder punishment to oblige the parties to belieue , and obey the sentence . 3. Because the scripture is mute , dumbe , & vnable to speake , heare or pronounce sentence , and is apt , not only to be lost , alteted , and corrupted , as de facto it hath beene ; but also to be drawne , wrested , and interpreted to contrary senses and opinions , by any sort of interpreters , in any cause , and question ; as the lamentable practise of so many hundred of heresies , & hereticks in all ages doth witnesse . 4. Because the scripture in it selfe is neither cleare , and euident , nor doth euidently and expresly containe , and declare all the senses of it selfe , all the mysteries of beliefe , all the questions of controuersies , all doubtes in diuinity , many things being both now by Protestants , and Catholicks belieued , and hauing beene by all faithfull in all ages practised , which neither for practise were groūded vpō only scripture , nor for the doctrine of thē are expressed in any scripture . 5. Because many haue beene conuerted to faith without any reading , or knowledge of scripture , many controuersies haue beene decided without any sentence of scripture ; many faithfull haue liued in the world , and beene directed in their faith before any writing of scripture . As for example ; all in the old Law for 3000. yeares before Moyses , all in the new law for a good time after the sending of the holy Ghost , & dispersion of the Apostles ; and many nations after Christ for 200. years , who ( witnesse Irenaeus ) neuer did see , nor heare of the bible ; and many thousands of saints and soules who did neuer see , read , heare , or vnderstand any Scripture at all , and yet did liue holily in earth , and do raigne gloriously in heauen . 6. In the scripture are two things , the letter , and the sense ; as the body & the soule . The letter , according to S. Augustine , doth kill , that is , the externall litterall sense of the words sometimes doth kill , & cause errour : but the spirit , that is , the true sense , which the holy Ghost intended , doth quicken , & auaileth to saluation . But that neither the letter , nor the spirit , can be a competēt iudge of controuersies , is proued . 7. Not the letter , because the letter , or the words in the bare literall sense are occasion of errour , and heresy , for so they were to the Iewes , who in reading of Moyses & the Law , had the veile set ouer their eyes , and vnderstood not Christ contained and signified in the Ceremonies of the law . And so it hath beene to all Heretickes , who forsaking the sense intended by the holy Ghost , & proposed by the Church , and following the letter expounded by their owne spirit , haue falsly vnderstood the scripture , & grosly fallen into errours . Thus the letter deceaued Sabellius , who expounding that of S. Iohn , I and the father am one , of vnity of persons , not of substance ; falsly defended , in the deity to be not three , but only one person , which had three names , offices , or properties of the father , the sonne , & the holy Ghost , creating , redeeming , and sanctifying mankind , & , as the Patripassiās defended , the Father to haue suffered on the Crosse as one and the same person with the sonne . Thus the letter deceaued the Arrians , who expounding that of S. Iohn , The father is greater then I , of Christ absolutly and completely as whole Christ , not as man according to his humanity ; did thereupon deny Christ to be God , equall to the Father . Thus it deceaued the Macedonians , who expounding that of S. Paul , The spirit searcheth all things , euen the profoundites of God , concluded , not as they ought , that the spirit pierceth & cōprehendeth all things as God ; but thus , that he who searches doubts , who doubts is ignorant , who is ignorant , is not God ; and so the holy Ghost , who searches all , is not God. Thus it deceaued the Manichees , who held the old Testamēt to be cōtrary to the new , because , for instance , the old said , that (a) God created all things ; That God ceased frō labour (b) the seuenth day ; That (c) Man was created according to the Image of God. And the new said the contrary , that (d) the Word created all things ; That (e) God worketh vntill now ; And that you (f) are of your father the diuell . Not conceauing , according to the spirit and true sense , that God created all things by the word , as by an Idaea ; that God rested from his worke of creation , and yet worketh by conseruation ; that man was created to the Image of God by nature , and of the diuell by malice . Thus the Pelagians denying originall sinne to haue descended from Adam to vs , literally interpreted that of Ezechiel , ( The (g) sonne shall not beare the iniquity of the father , ) not only of sonnes who are not partakers , but also of sonnes who are partakers of the iniquity of the father , as all are of Adams sinne , in whome (h) all sinned , and who receaued , as head , the promise of keeping , or losing paradise by precept of for bearing , or eating the apple for himselfe , and his posterity after him . Thus it deceaued others , who applying literally that of S. Iohn ( The flesh profiteth nothing ) some , in the Apostles time to the resurrection of the flesh , others of late to the reall presence in the B. Sacrament ; the one therupon denyed the resurrection of all bodies ; the other the reall presence of Christs body ; both vpon one ground , not distinguishing the spirituall from the carnall manner of one and the same body . By which they might as well inferre , that the flesh of Christ by his incarnation and passion profiteth no more , then ( according to them ) it doth by his resurrection and manducation . By which proofe of authority and examples it is apparent that the external letter of scripture cannot be iudge of controuersies . That the internall sense of Scripture cannot be iudge , is likwise proued , because this true sense intended by the holy Ghost is often obscure , hard , and vncertaine ; as is certaine , and before proued . This obscurity breeds controuersies , as experience dayly teaches , and that these controuersies cannot be ended & iudged by scripture-sense , is proued . 1. Because scripture-sense is the thing in question , & contention , therfore is the thing to be iudged , and decided ; not the iudge who is to giue iudgment , and resolue the parties contending in iudgmēt . As for example , a question is about the sense of those words of the Gospel , this is my body , & of those of the Creed , He descended into hell ; Catholikes vnderstand them as the words import , of the reall presence , and of the locall descension , both , of Christs body : Protestants expound them of a figuratiue presence by remembrāce of him in the sacrament ; and of an infernall suffering of hel-paines in his soule vpon the Crosse . Now of these senses which is true , which false , the sense of the words cannot iudge betweene Catholicks and Protestants , but some other iudge is necessary to confirme the one , and confound the other , & so to end the controuersy . 2. Because many places of scripture are so hard and obscure , as the true sense of them cannot be truly discerned , but by Church practise and tradition , as for example , whether those words of S. Mathew , Teach all nations , baptizing them in the name of the father , and of the sonne , and of the holy Ghost , do proue a necessity of the vocall pronuntiation of these wordes , for the forme of baptisme , as all Protestants with vs do grant ; or require no more but a mentall intention , it sufficing only to baptize in the name of Iesus , as Act. 8.26 . doth insinuate . Whether those of S. Iohn , Except a man be borne againe of water , and the holy Ghost , he cannot enter into the kingdome of God , inferre a necessity of water for the matter of baptisme , as the Lutherans with vs grant , and the words import ; or that the water and the holy Ghost be all one , as Caluin expounds . Also why the Protestants should not inferre as well a precept and necessity of a sacrament of washing of feet out of those words of our Sauiour , And you (a) ought to wash one anothers feet , after the example of Christ , who did , and commanded it ; as they do , out of those of S. Mathew , Eat yee , & drinke yee , inferre a necessity of receauing vnder both kinds , because our Sauiour did , & commanded the like . Now these , and such like , require a Iudge to iudge of the sense , and reason of them , & cannot themselues iudge , and decide themselues to vs. By which is euident that neither the letter , nor the sense of scripture can be a competent iudge of all controuersies of faith , and scripture . Lastly , the same is proued by the analogy of a temporal Iudge in causes ciuill , with an Ecclesiasticall Iudge in causes spirituall ; for as Controuersies aryse in ciuill causes , & the common-wealth : so do they arise also in matters spirituall , and the Church . As therfore there are customes , lawes , & Iudges to decide causes ciuill : so there is Tradition , Scripture , and a Iudge to decide causes spirituall : and as customes and lawes are a rule , not a Iudge , to decide the one ; so also are tradition , & Scripture , a rule , not a Iudge to decide the other . As well therefore is requisite , besides Scripture , some other liuing and speaking Iudge in matters of fayth & religion , to iudge and end the Controuersies among Christiās , as is necessary , besids Law , some other personal iudge in affaires of the Common-wealth , to debate and decide contentions among Neighbours . The necessity of both which chiefly appeares , when either the parties are contentious and not willing to yield , or that the law is obscure , and wantes explication , or seemes contradictory , and requires reconciliation , or is penned in tearms generall , and stands need of some restriction in causes particuler . All which sith they fall out as well in Scripture , as in common , or ciuill lawes , some iudge or iudges are as well necessary to expound Scripture , as they are to interprete Lawes , and thereby to end Controuersies . And thus is sufficiently proued , that neither Scripture , and the word of God , nor Princes , and Kinges , Gouernours of the Common-wealth , nor the Lay & common people among the Faythfull , nor yet the whole body and congregation of the Church of God , can be a fit iudge to pronounce sentence , and determine matters of fayth and religion . Bishops and Prelats of the true Church , are this Iudge . SECT . VI. IT remaines to proue , that this iudiciary power , and authority to heare , and examine , to decide , and determine as a Iudge authentical and infallible , in matters of fayth , belongs only to Pastours , and Prelates of the Church , and that they hauing receaued lawfull ordination by power successiuely descending from the Apostles ( by which they enter as sheepheardes , not theeues ) and still remayning in vnity , without heresy or schisme ( by which they continue true Pastours , not Wolues ) that they , I say , thus ordained and vnited , are the only and true Iudges of fayth & Religion . This position as much importing for the certainty of fayth in all persons , and mainly confuting the authority of the priuate spirit in euery priuate person , is fully to be proued . 1. By the authority of the old Testament , & the practise of the Priests in it . 2. By authority of the new Testament , and the practise of Christ , and his Apostles in it . 3. By authority of the Church euer after Christ , and the practise of all Bishops , & Prelates in it . First , therefore out of the old Testament , we haue an expresse law made by God himselfe for this iudiciary authority of Priests , in these wordes : If thou perceaue that the iudgment with thee be hard and doubtfull betweene blood and blood , cause and cause , leprosy and not leprosy , and thou see that the wordes of the Iudges , within thy gates , do vary ; aryse , and go vp to the place , which our Lord thy God shall choose , & thou shalt come to the Priests of the Leuiticall stocke , and to the Iudge that shall be at that tyme , and thou shalt aske of them ▪ who shall shew thee the truth of the iudgment : and thou shalt doe whatsoeuer they that are Presidents of the place , which our Lord shall choose , shall say and teach thee , according to his law ; and thou shalt follow their sentence , neither shalt thou decline to the right hand , nor to the left hand , but he that shal be proud , refusing to obey the Commandment of the Priest , which at that tyme ministreth to our Lord thy God ▪ and the decree of the Iudge , that man shall dye . In which wordes , 1. The Priests haue authority , and commission to iudge of all causes . 2. The people are willed to go to them , for iudgment in doubtfull causes . 3. Vnder paine of death they are commaūded to stand too , & obey their iudgment , without appeale to any higher Court of Prince or other . In which we may note , 1. The institution , and beginning of this authority of the Priests in the old Law. 2. The progresse , and continuance of it . 3. The end and cessation of it . 1. The institution of it (a) was for all cases of the Law , of Commandment , of Ceremonies , of iustifications , that is , of the law morall , of the ten Commandments , ceremoniall of seruing God ; and iudicial , of gouerning the people , though in this place be mentioned only two causes , that is , of blood , and leprosy . These causes were determined in two Courts , or Councells , the one greater at Hierusalem called Synedrion , consisting of the high Priest as chiefe , and 70. with him as assistantes , in which , greater causes were iudged , and appeales from the lower Councell were admitted , and this was by God himselfe (b) instituted . The other lesser in euery Citty , consisting of 23. persons , who had the hearing , and determining of smaller causes , and was by Moyses , (c) at the aduice of Iethro his Father in law , instituted . By these two Councells were all causes iudged , of these the Priests were Presidents and Iudges , and of the greater the high Priest , for the tyme , was supreme Iudge , whose sentēce in all causes , and vnder paine of death all were obliged to obey . 2. The continuance of this law and tribunall-seat doth appeare . 1. By the facts of some of the Kinges , chiefly of (d) Iosaphat King of Iuda , which repaired this Councel being decayed , and made Amarias the high Priest , President for those things which belonged to God , and Zabadias , for the office of the Kinges . 2. By the wordes of the Prophets , especially of Malachy , who sends the people to the Priests , (e) to require the law from his mouth , because he is the Angell of the Lord of Hoasts . Of Aggaeus , who bids them (f) aske the Priests ●e Law. And of the Wiseman , who (g) wils his sonne to seeke no further , because the words of wisemen are as prickes , and as nailes deeply stricken in , which by the councel of Maisters , are giuē of one Pastour . Therfore this sentence is the last iudgmēt , which admits no appeale . 3. The end & cessation of this law , and Tribunall of Moyses , doth appeare by the beginning of a new Tribunal of Christ . For , as with the death of Christ , the obligation of the law , the sacrifices of the Law , and the prophesies vnder the law ceased , and the verity of them being in his passion fullfilled : so also the iudiciary power both of the Priest , and of the Law diminished , as the greater power of the new law-maker Christ , increased . And the assistance of the holy Ghost , by degrees failed them , and their Councell , as by degrees the power of Christ was more plainely manifested , & the grace of the holy Ghost more abundantly bestowed : of which out of Scripture we haue this proofe , and experiment ; whereas the high Priest , with the Priests , Scribes , and Pha●isies gathered three Councells in the life of Christ , all about the person of Christ , 1. In his infancy , at the cōming of the Wise-men , to consult where he was borne , whē Herod would haue killed him , 2. Before his passion , after the raysing of Lazarus , to aduise about his apprehension , when Caiphas vpon malice aduised his death , and as Priest prophesyed of the Iewes saluation by his (a) death , 3. At his passion , when by false witnes they condemned him as guilty of death , and thereupon procured his (b) death : In the first , the holy Ghost fully assisted them , and their Councell , that their determination was both true and iust : In the second , the holy Ghost assisted in part the high Priest , in that his verdict of the Iewes saluation by one , which verdict proceeded from the guift of prophesy annexed to his Priestly function ; and in part forsooke him , in that is was iniust , for that he did vpon malice condemne him : In the third , the holy Ghost quite forsooke them , both in verity of the sentence , as falsely accusing Christ of blasphemies ; and in the iustice of the same , as wrongfully condemning him to be worthy of death . By which is declared how farre the Priests iudiciary power before Christ did extend it selfe , how long it did endure , in what manner by degrees it did cease and end ; & out of all is conuinced , that neither Prince , people , or priuate person , but the Priest in that tyme had power to decide , and iudge all Controuersies of the law , & of fayth . Secondly , this authority of Priests and Prelates is proued out of the new Testament , and that two wayes . 1. By the commission , & authority which our Sauiour gaue to the Apostles , and by their practise of it . 2. By the same Commission giuen to the same Apostles , not only for themselues and their owne tyme , but also for their successours , and all tymes , & ages . That our Sauiour gaue this iudiciary power to his Apostles , and to them only , is proued , 1. By the authority , and commission he gaue to S. Peter , as the head . 2. By the same which he gaue to the rest , as the principall mēbers and directours of the Church vnder this head . To S. Peter as head , he first promised it , thē he prayed to confirme him in it . 1. He promised it , in that he promised to make him the foundation of the Church , by giuing him the title of a Rocke , saying : Vpon this Rocke I will build my Church ; for what a maister is in a house , what a gouernour is in a Citty , what a King is in a kingdome , and what a head is in a body , the same is a foundatiō in a building , & Peter in the Church ; therefore to Peter was heere promised , to be the head , the foundation , and the Gouernour of his Church . 2. In that he promised to make him the Gouernour of the Church in a representatiue manner , giuing him keyes of it : To thee I will giue the keyes of the Kingdome of heauen . For as the deliuering vp the keyes of the Citty to any , is a signe of giuing vp the charge and gouernement of it to him : so the promise of giuing to Peter the keyes of the kingdome of heauen , was a promise of giuing power & authority to gouerne , as a Iudge , the Kingdome of heauen , that is , his Church . 3. In that he gaue him power to bind and loose , that is , to retaine , or remit , by way of absoluing , or not absoluing ; to commaund and punish , by way of dispensation , censure , sentence , or iudgement , not only persons whomesoeuer , but also causes whatsoeuer , whether of crimes , and offences against lawes , or in doctrine and opinion against fayth . And so the promise was made , 1. To the person of S. Peter . 2. Of authority to be Iudge and Gouernour . 3. In all causes of doctrine , or offēces whatsoeuer . 4. Christ prayed to his Father for confirmation of this authority vpon S. Peter : I prayed for thee , that thy fayth faile not , and thou once conuerted , confirme thy Brethren , that is , that he might be firme in his fayth , and thereby with his power confirme , and settle others in the same . Out of which Lucius , Felix , Marcus , Leo , Agatho , & Paschalis Popes with S. Bernard after them , cited by Bellarmine , doe gather the infallibility of S. Peter , and the Popes power in iudgment of fayth . Lastly Christ inuested S. Peter in this authority and iurisdiction , when he gaue him commission and charge to feed his sheep : Feed my Sheep , feed my Lambes ; in which he gaue authority to Peter singularly , as to one whō he calls Simon the sonne of Iohanna , and from whome in particuler he drawes before hand a triple confession of his singular loue to him , aboue the rest . He giues also him authority to feed , that is , to exercise all pastorall charge and function , which requires , 1. That he feed with spirituall food , all his sheep within the fold of his holy Church , according to Ezechiel , Are not the flocks fed of the Pastours ? And Psalm . 22.1 . Our Lord doth gouerne me ( in greeke , feed me ) nothing shal be wāting to me : he hath placed me there in a place of pasture . 2. That he cure the sheep that are sore , gather those who are dispersed , reduce them that wander , and defend those who are assaulted by the wolues , according to that of Ezechiel : And my sheep were dispersed because there was no Pastour , and they came to be deuoured of the beastes of the field , and were dispersed . My flockes haue wandered in all mountaines , and in euery high hill . That which was lost I will seeke , that which was cast away , I will bring againe , and that which was broken , I will bind vp , and that which was weake , I will strengthen ; and that which was fat and stronge , I will feed them in iudgment . 3. That he rule , gouerne , discerne , iudge , and chastise , according to that of Scripture : Thou (a) shalt feed ( that is gouerne ) my people Israel , and be Captaine ouer Israel . Thou (b) shalt rule them in an iron rod. Behould (c) I iudge betweene beast and beast , of Rams , and of Bucke goates : Betweene (d) the fat beast , and the leane . Out of which is apparent , 1. That our Sauiour gaue to S. Peter , in these wordes , feed my sheep , a pastorall charge ouer al his sheep , that is , all Christians who are the sheep of Christ . 2. That this pastorall charge consists in collecting , curing , directing , defending and iudging these sheep of Christ . 3. That Peter , by this charge , had power to preach , minister Sacraments , correct offenders , and iudge of all doctrine , as chiefe head , and Gouernour in the Church of Christ . And so it is conuinced , that this iudiciary authority was giuen to S. Peter , as head of the rest . That the same was giuen also to the rest of the Apostles , is proued , because as Christ did communicate to his Apostles power , and authority which was proper to himselfe , to forgiue sinnes : VVhose (e) sinnes you forgiue in earth , shal be forgiuen in heauen ; and to offer Sacrifice , (f) Do this : So also to the same did he communicate these priuiledges proper to himselfe , that as he was Maister of all , One (g) is your Maister Christ : so also he made them Maisters , not (h) only of Infants , but also (i) of Nations , that they should (k) teach all Nations . As he was light of men ; so (l) they should be the light of the world . As he gaue (m) testimony to the truth ; so (n) they should giue testimony , and be witnesses of him to the end of the earth . That (o) as the Father did sanctify him ; so (p) he prayed to his Father to sanctify them . As (q) he was sent by his Father into the world ; so he sent them . As by a voice from heauen it was sayd of him , (r) heare him ; so by his owne mouth he sayd of them , (s) he that heareth you , heareth me . The Apostles therefore were appointed for Maisters , specially sanctifyed , made the light of the world , ordained witnesses of his truth , & sent with authority , and commission , as himselfe was , for that end that they should be heard , and obeyed as himselfe was : and the same power they receaued from him , not only themselues challenged and practised after him , and with him ; but also their Successours after them , and with them . For as Christ was giuen (t) a light of the Nations ; so they , sayth S. Luke ▪ were (u) also the light of the nations . As (w) the spirit of God was on him to euangelize to the poore ; so God chose them , sayth S. Luke , that (x) the Gentils by their mouth , should heare the word of the Ghospell , and belieue . As (y) he did reconcile the world to himselfe ; so he , sayth S. Paul , placed (z) in them the word of reconciliation . As he came an Embassadour from his Father , to (a) be a messenger of iudgment to the world ; so , sayth S. Paul , we (b) are Legates for Christ. As our Sauiour sayd of himselfe , He (c) that is God , doth heare the wordes of God , therefore you heare not , because you are not of God ; so doth S. Iohn say of them ▪ He (d) that knoweth God heareth vs , and he that is not of God , heareth vs not . Therefore as Christ thought it no robbery to be equal to his Father in diuinity ; so they thought it no iniury to him to be in some sort , participant with him , in his power , and authority . And that Christ gaue this authority to the Apostles , not only for themselues , and their owne time ; but also for their successors , and for all ages , so that it is to reside and remaine in the Pastours , and prelates of holy Church their successors continually till the end of the world , is euident : for if he haue this authority as necessary for the peace and gouernement of his Church , and if the Church stand as great need of it in all ages , as in that time of the Apostles , as it is certaine it doth ; then without doubt it was as well giuen to the Pastours of the future tymes of the Church , as to them of the present : for which end , Christ ( sayth S. Paul ) gaue (e) some Apostles , some Prophets , some Euangelists , some Pastours and Doctours , and for what end ? For (f) the consummation or perfection of Saints , that is , of all faythfull , for the worke of the ministery , to teach his truth , for the edification and propagation of his body , to conserue and increase his Church , for (g) the vnity of fayth vntill all concurre in one ; least (h) men be wauering and vncertaine in faith like little ones ; least they be carryed with euery wind of doctrine ; least they be circumuented by craftines in errour . All which dangers as they remaine in all tymes , so the remedy prepared against them must remaine for all tymes . Whereupon S. Peter did not only himselfe exercise this authority , but at his departure gaue the same to the Pastours of Pontus , Galatia , and Bythinia , to whome he writ his Epistles , willing them to (i) feed the flocke of God , which is among them . S. Paul did not only practise it himselfe , but also left it to the Pastors of Ephesus (k) to rule the Church of God. To Titus , to (l) ordaine Priests through all Citties in Creet , as he had disposed . To Timothy , to (m) commend to faithfull men , what he had heard of him , and willed the conuerted Iewes , to (n) obey their Gouernours ▪ and be subiect to them because they watch as being to giue an account of their soules . Whereupon , not of the Apostles only , but of all Pastours , and only of Pastours , it is sayd : (o) My spirit which is in thee , and my wordes which I haue put in thy mouth , shall not depart out of thy mouth , nor out of the mouth of thy seed , nor out of the mouth of thy seeds seed , frō this present for euer . What is this word , my (p) spirit which is in thee ; but ( to compare the prophesy and the performance ) the Paraclete , the spirit of truth , which the Father will giue to you ? What are , the wordes in thy mouth , but the wordes and vnderstanding (q) which thou ( Father ) gauest to me , I gaue to them , and they receaued of me ? What is , thy seed , and seeds seed , but those who are to (r) belieue by their word in me ? What is , from this tyme for euer , but that , I (s) will be with you euen to the consummation of the world ? And so doth the prediction of the Prophet concurre with the performance of our Sauiour . To all Pastours , and only of Pastours it is sayd : Sonnes (t) are borne to thee for thy fathers , and thou shalt make them Princes ouer all the earth , that is , according to S. Augustine , for Apostles , thou shalt haue Prelates . To al Pastours and only to Pastours it is sayd : He (u) that heares you , heares me . And , He (x) that knowes God , heares vs , and he that is not of God , heares vs not . That is ( sayth S. Cyprian ) all (y) Gouernours who by subordination succeed the Apostles . Because , sayth S. Augustin , In (z) the chaire of vnity he hath placed the doctrine of verity . Of al , and to all Pastours it is sayd : How (a) shall they preach except they be sent ? No (b) man assumes to himself honour , but he that is called of God , as Aaron . To all , and only of Pastours it is sayd : If (c) he heare not the Church , let him be to thee as the Heathen , and Publican , that is , sayth (d) Chrysostome , and Theophilact , if he heare not the Pastours of the Church . And if he be worthy to be esteemed so , who despises them , that admonish him of his fault ; much more worthy is he to be deemed so , who despises him who instructs him in fayth . To all , and only Pastours it is sayd : That (e) the gates of hell shall not preuaile against the Church . In so much , that all the promises of Church-stability , and perpetuity in fayth , cōsists chiefly in this infallible authority of the Pastours , who are to instruct in fayth , direct in fayth , and to iudge of fayth , and what promises are made to the Church , are made chiefly to the Pastours , as the principall partes of it , and by thē to the rest as inferiour . To them therefore is giuen the (f) word of reconciliation , the (g) dispensation of the mysteries , the (h) function of Embassages , the (i) testimony of truth to all Nations . They are the Fathers who beget spirituall children by the preaching of the word , who nourish them with the food of the Sacraments , who rule them by good lawes and discipline , and who defend them with their spirituall power & authority . They only haue the (k) Keyes of the house of Dauid , which they shall open and none shut . The (l) keyes of the Kingdome of heauen , against which hell-gates shall not preuaile , and the (m) kingly Priesthood . All , because in , and by their priestly function and authority , Christ doth forgiue sinnes , doth reconcile to him the world , doth make lawes , doth exercise his power , and establish his kingdome of heauen , and doth (n) raigne in the house of Iacob for euer . And thus is the iudiciary authority of the Church in the Pastours , and Prelates of it , lawfully ordained , and peaceably vnited , proued by the testimony of holy Scripture . The same is further proued by the practise of the Church in all tymes , and ages ; for when any Controuersy did arise , any new opinion did start vp , or any practise was doubtful , and questioned ; the decision and iudgment was referred , neither to the whole body of all belieuers , nor to the Princes , Kinges , and Emperours , the chiefe Protectours of the Church , not to the Lay-people the greatest number in the Church , not to the Scripture & written word only , which is a rule , not properly a Iudge in the Church : but to the chiefe Pastours , and Prelates , the Directours & Gouernours of the Church , who collected togeather in some Councell , either prouinciall ( which sufficed in cases where the cause was either not important , or other could not be collected ) or generall ( which was gathered when the cause was great , the aduersaries potent , and the assembling conuenient ) had the hearing , examining , and iudging of the cause referred to them , and did censure the persons , and put a finall determination to the cause , & question . Thus we read , that the question about the obseruation of Legall Ceremonies , was determined in the Councell of the Apostles at Hierusalem . The Controuersy about the obseruation of Easter on the 14. day , as the Iewes vsed , or the Sunday after , as is now by Christians vsed , was by diuers Councels decided , as at Rome vnder Pope Victor , at Hierusalem vnder Narcissus , in France vnder Irenaeus , in Pontus vnder Palma , at Corinth vnder Bachillus , and lastly at Nice vnder Pope Syluester . Thus was the Nouatians and their sect , denying pennance and absolution to them who failed in persecution , condemned by the Prelates , and Bishops of Italy at Rome , of France at Arles , and of Africke at Carthage . Thus was Sabellius , and his heresy , denying the Trinity of persons , condemned by the Prelates of Aegypt at Alexandria . The Donatists , and their schisme , denying the validity of Baptisme ministred by Heretikes , cōdemned at Rome , Arles , and Carthage , and other places by the Bishops of the same Countryes . Paulus Samosetanus , and his errour , affirming Christ to be pure man , was condemned by the Bishops of Asia , in two Synodes at Antioch . Thus were the Manicheans condemned at Ancyra , the Archontickes at Neocaesaria ; Eustachius at Gangra in Armenia ; Priscillianus at Toledo in Spaine ; Pelagius in Palestina , Melitum , Carthage , & Constantinople . And Macedonius , Apollinaris , Photinus , Sabellius , & Eunomius at Rome ; Berengarius at Vercells , and Rome ; Luther , and his fellowes at Ments , Treuers , and Colen in Germany , and Macline , Cambray , and other places in the low-Countryes . All which , and many more were censured , and iudged by the Bishops called in Synodes Prouinciall . In like manner by the Prelates collected in generall Councells , were censured and iudged the causes of greater heresies , and contentions : As that of Arius , in the first Coūcell of Nice , and the diuinity of Christ defended . That of Macedonius , in the second generall at Constantinople , and the deity of the Holy Ghost confirmed . That of Nestorius in the third generall at Ephesus , and the vnity of one diuine person in Christ decreed . That of Eutiches , in the fourth generall Councell of Chalcedon , and the verity of two natures in Christ concluded . That of Peter and Seuerus of Antioch , Petrus of Apamea , Cyrus of Edessa , Anthymius & Acatius of Constātinople , in the fifth generall at Constantinople , and their persons , with Origens errours , condemned . That of Cyrus of Alexandria , Sergius , Pyrrhus , and Paulus of Constantinople , and their Monothelite heresy of one will in Christ , in the sixth generall at Constantinople condemned , and the two wills in Christ determined . That of Leo , and Copronymus Emperours , and the Image-breakers with them , in the seauenth at Nice , censured , and the worship of Images defended . That of Photius , and the deniers of the procession of the holy Ghost from the Sonne , in the eight generall at Constantinople , reiected , and Ignatius the Patriarch confirmed . All which were in the Greeke Church . In the latin and West Church Bishops also proceeded , and iudged in the generall Councels , as in the ninth and tenth generall at Lateran against the Sarazens , and Anti-popes , vnder Calixtus II. and Innocent II. In the eleuenth and twelfth also of Lateran against the Waldenses , and Ioachim the Abbot , vnder Alexander the III. and Innocent III. In the thirtenth & fourtenth of Lyons , against Fredericke the Emperour , and the errour of the Greeks vnder Innocent IV. and Gregory the X. In the fifteenth at Vienna , against the Begards , and others , vnder Clement the V. In the sixteenth at Florence , against the Greeks , vnder Eugenius the IV. In the seauenteenth at Lateran , vnder Leo the X. against Schismatikes . And lastly in the last at Trent vnder Paul III. Iulius the III. and Pius the IV. against the Lutherans , & all Heretikes of late . In all which , and others , examination was made , and iudgment giuen , not by Princes , Lay-people , or the whole body of the Cleargy , but only by Bishops , and Prelates , the chiefe Pastours of the Church , who only , and not the former , were , as appeares by authority of Scripture , and the continued practise of the Church , the true , authenticall , and infallible Iudges of controuersies of Fayth , and Religion . The priuate spirit cannot be this Iudge . SECT . VII . IT remaynes to proue , that this infallible and authenticall authority to iudge of controuersies of Fayth , neither doth , nor can reside in euery particuler faythfull person , nor that the priuate spirit of euery one ( which is heer intended ) can be a competent Iudge of all controuersies of Religion . This is conuinced by diuers proofes drawne from diuers heades . The first proofe is drawne from the former reasons , which disproue this authority to reside , either in Princes , or in the lay-people , or the whole community of all faythfull belieuers ; for all the reasons which proue against them , and their spirit , proue much more against euery priuate person , and this spirit in particuler . The second proofe , is drawne from the former reasons , which proue this authority to be communicated only to the Prelates and chiefe Pastours of the Church ; for if the spirit of God , for this end , be giuen only to them , as it was to Moyses , to iudge the people , then it was not for the same end giuen to all and euery one of the common people , and euery ordinary faythfull person among them . The third proofe , is drawne from the essentiall partes of an authenticall , and infallible Iudge , because in this spirit are to be found neither ability to know persons , nor authority to iudge causes , nor infallibility to pronounce a certaine sentence , and iudgment . First therefore , this spirit cannot know , and examine the state and disposition , the cause , and question of the person who is to be iudged , neither can the person who is to be iudged , know that this spirit remaynes in him , who is to iudge , or that authority by it is giuen to iudge . For this spirit , say they who chalenge it , is knowne , that it is the spirit of God , only to them who haue it ; how then shall it be knowne to others , who are to be iudged by it ? How shall the people know the spirit of the Pastour that they may be directed by it ; or the Pastour know the spirit of the people , that he may direct thē ? How shall any conuersation in discipline of good life , any communication in doctrine of fayth , any subordination in obedience to lawes , be obserued among these person , vncertaine one of anothers spirit , and authority by it ? How shall the sentence of absolution vpon the faythfull , or of condēnation vpon the faythlesse be iustly denounced ? How shall the doctrine of truth be preached , or the doctrine of falshood be confuted , and the people obliged to belieue the one , and to forsake the other ? How shall iustice be ordered , obedience obserued , authority maintained , lawes executed , and penalties inflicted , where neither the inferiour can know the spirit of the superiour , vpon which spirit his authority dependes ; nor yet the superiour can any way force , or compell the spirit of the inferiour , who yet will chalenge an equality of preheminence , and priuiledge of the spirit with him . Secondly , this spirit cannot challenge to it selfe any such power , or authority , or shew any authenticall warrant from God , that it is the spirit of God , either in Scripture , Tradition , or practise of the Church , all which , a● before , do reiect and condemne it . It cannot exercise any function which belonges to this authority , as to censure , or absolue , to oblige or vnity , to punish or reward any fault cōmitted , or person committing it . It cannot with equality of tryall , heare or examine the cause , nor denounce , and pronounce any sentence which can oblige . It cannot admonish , threaten , terrify , and enioyne any punishment by the rodde of iustice . It cannot compell , correct , and punish any delinquen● by way of exteriour iustice , or enforce the one party to yield , subscribe , and submit to the sentence of iustice . It cannot bridle , in the hand of the one , the fury of iniustice , or deliuer to the handes of the other , the right of iustice . It cannot conuince the one of his errour against truth , nor secure the other of his possession of truth . It cannot compell the one to cease from wronge , or giue redresse to the other in his wrong . What power hath the spirit of one man , to threaten , to command , to correct , or punish the spirit of another ? What authority can one spirit alleadge , which another cannot as well challenge ? What prerogatiue of spirit can the Pastour assume , of which the spirit of the people may not as well presume ? Vpon what priuiledge can any superiour stand , vpon which , and the same , any inferiour may not , or will not as well insist ? The inferiour can as cōfidently assure himselfe , as certainly auouch , and as resolutly resolue himselfe , that he hath receaued the (a) spirit of the Sonne of God dwelling in him . That he hath the (b) spirit of his sonne abiding in his heart , by which he cryeth Abbae Father . That (c) God hath giuen him also the pledge of the spirit ; The (d) spirit of adoption ; VVhich (e) doth giue testimony of his spirit . That (f) his spirit doth search all thinges , yea the profundities of God. That (g) his spirit doth try all thinges , yea prophesyes ; Doth (h) try all spirits if they be of God ; And that he is (i) a spirituall man , doth iudge of all thinges , and himselfe is to be iudged of no man , because he hath the sense of Christ , and knoweth the sense of our Lord , that may instruct him . Where is then the authority of the Pastour ouer a flocke endewed with this spirit , or the power of the superiour to correct a people full of this spirit ? How shall the one compell to obey , and the other haue the liberty of the spirit not to obey ? What order or subordination , what discipline & gouernement can be established among such spirits , or men ruled and directed by such spirits ? Thirdly , this priuate spirit cannot giue any certainty , or infallibility of the verity of his iudgment ; for it cannot assure and secure any , that it is a spirit of God not Sathan , of light not darknesse , of truth not falshood , of a true not a false Prophet . It cannot assure & secure any , that his iudgment , for example , of predestination , iustification , certainty of saluation of only fayth , is not a presumption , and illusion , and rather hereticall , then Catholike doctrine . It cannot assure and secure others either that the spirit is true , or that the iudgement of it , is vpright , or that the doctrine of it is true ; all sectes , and heresies , whether Caluinist or Lutheran , rigid or milder , whether Protestant or Puritan , whether Brownist or Familist , whether Anabaptist or Arian , whether Swenkfeldian or Libertine , challeng it for the certainty of their doctrine as true , are taught , and directed by it as true ; and yet some , or all of them must needes be false , as being contrary euery one to another , euery one condemning another , and all condemned by the authority of Gods Church , and by the spirit of God , instructing and assisting it . By all which it is apparent that the priuate spirit wanting visibility to be knowne , authority to iudge , and infallibility to secure , cannot be an authenticall iudge of controuersies of Fayth . Fourthly , the fourth reason against this priuate spirits infallible authority to iudge of fayth , is drawne from the properties of a rule , & foundation of fayth , before assigned ; all which are wanting in it . For first , it wants the promise of any certainty , and infallibility ; it hath no promise , or warrāt in Scripture , that it is the Pillar (a) and ground of truth ▪ the (b) house , the temple , the kingdome of Christ ; that hell gates shal not preuaile against it ; that (c) he who heareth it heareth Christ ; who (d) contemneth it contemneth Christ ; and (e) who obeys it not is as the Heathen and Publican ; that (f) it shall remayne with euery man , shall teach euery man all truth , and instruct euery man in all which Christ shall speake to him . All which yet are promised to the holy Church , and the spirit of God in it . Secondly , It wants continuance , and duration ; for as it is a priuate spirit in euery one , and can continue no longer , then the person in whome it is , and with whome it begins and ends , liues , and dyes ; so it hath no promise of Scripture to endure from age to age ▪ from generation to generation , from Saboth to Saboth , as long as the Sunne and Moone shall endure , till the end of the world , to the seed , and seeds seed , for all generations . All which are yet promised to holy Church , and the spirit of God in it . Thirdly , it wants immutability , and freedome from alteration or change , for as we see it changes in euery place , tyme , and person , yea as often as the Moone , breeding , as S. Hilary sayd of the Arians , a monthly & yearly fayth : and as one of them confesses , What to day they hould you know , but what to morrow , neither you , nor they can know , in what head of religion do they agree , who oppugne the Bishop of Rome : if you examine all from the head to the foot , you shall almost find nothing affirmed by one , which another will not auerre to be wicked ; the Deuines do dayly differ from themselues , coyning a monthly fayth . Thus it changes in all doctrines , and in opinions of Scripture , some affirming this part to be scripture , which others deny ; some inuenting one sense , and others a contrary ; and it so alters from sect to sect ; from heresy , to heresy ; from Catholike , to Lutheran ; from this , to Caluinisme ; from that , to Anabaptisme ; from thence , to Arianisme ; and so on to Iudaisme , Turcisme , and Atheisme . And as this alteration de facto workes in Protestants ; so also it hath no promise of constancy , that it is (a) a Rocke ; a (b) pillar , a foundation ; as (c) the Sunne before God ; as sure as (d) the day , and the night ; that it hath (e) an euerlasting couenant which shall stand for euer , and for an eternall glory , and not be giuen ouer . All which is yet promised to the Church , and the spirit of God in it . Fourthly , it wants Visibility , and publike manifestation to vs , not only that it is the spirit of God , of which before , but much more in whom it remaines : for as that which is in one cannot manifest it selfe to another ; so others cannot manifestly know that it is in any one . Aske , for example , the Lutherans who follow Luther , and his spirit ; the Caluinists who follow Caluin , and his spirit ; the Anabaptistes , who follow Rotman , and his spirit ; the A●ians , who follow Seruetus , and his spirit ; the Libertines who follow Quintinus , and his spirit ; or any Precisian who follow a precise preacher , and his spirit , how they know that Luther doth enioy this spirit , more then Caluin ; or Caluin more then Rotman ; or Rotman more then Seruetus ; or Seruetus more then Quintinus ; or any one of them , more then the Pope , and Catholike Church vnder him ? They can giue no reason more for one , then for another , shew no cause , why they follow one spirit , more then another , or why they should be persuaded , confirmed , & directed to the fayth of any one more then another . This spirit therefore hath not the conspicuity and visibility of being (a) as a tabernacle in the Sunne ; (b) the Sunne in my light ; (c) a candle vpon a candlesticke ; or (d) seauen candlestickes in the Temple ; a (e) citty vpon a hill ; (f) a mountaine in the top of mountaines eleuated aboue the little hills , that it may be seene , and knowne of all the world . All which yet are agreable to the Catholike Church , and the spirit of God in it . Fifthly , this spirit wants combination , or connexion , by which it may combine all faithfull in one bond of Vnity , and Concord ; and so distinguish a true Church from a false ; a right belieuing Catholike , from a deceitfull heretike , and a right way to heauen , from an erroneous path to perdition . It is priuate , and particuler in euery man , diuerse and contrary in most men . It did suggest of old one beliefe , for example , in Sabellius , another in Marcion , another in Nestorius , another in Apollinaris and Eutiches ; and it hath suggested of late , one in Luther , another in Zuinglius , a third in Caluin , a fourth in Munzer , a fifth in Seruetus , and aboue 220. in this last age , in so many new Maisters , and founders of new sects , (a) all whose hartes are diuided , and (b) like the Aegyptians , run togeather against the Aegyptians ; and (c) by diuision make the kingdome of Christ desolate . And yet all of them call this , their spirit of the Lord , all build their beliefe vpon it , all are directed by it in their contrary doctrine and beliefe . Aske any one or all of them how they are instructed , who they follow , by what they are directed ; all answere by this spirit , all appeale to this priuate spirit , and yet all want that spirit , which (d) keepeth vnity of the spirit in the body of peace ; (e) which should continue them in one minde ; (f) in one agreement and iudgement ; (g) in one hart and soule , in one way and path ; (h) and make them all one , as Christ was one in his Father . Which spirit notwithstanding resides , and dwels in the Catholike Church . Sixthly , this spirit wants Vniuersality , as vnable to resolue all doubts and questions which arise , either about Scripture , in the obscurity , profundity , and multiplicity of senses , or in the seeming contradictions , figuratiue locutions , and seuerall interpretations of the wordes , the various Texts , and reading , the many dissonance● of yeares in numbring , the different translation of words from the originall , or which arise about the mysteries belieued ; as the vnity of the God-head ; the Trinity of persons in the Blessed Trinity ; the person , the natures , the wills , the body , the soule of Christ ; the nature of grace , free-will , sinne , iustification , sacraments , Church , prayer to Saints , for the dead , Purgatory , and thousands such like , which this spirit could neuer decide , and end , either in tymes ancient , or of late , but with contention it begunne all these differences , in contention it proceeded in them , and neuer ceased till by contention it consumed it selfe , and ended them . It cannot sufficiently conuince any one , either Pagan or Infidell , either Turke or Iew , either Heretike or obstinate Person , that they are in errour , and haue not the spirit of God , as well as true Christians . It cannot conuert , reduce , or confirme any to the verity of true fayth , who is either ignorant of Fayth , or staggering in his fayth , or obstinate against faith . It can giue no probable reasons of persuasion , propose no credible testimonies of inducement , deliuer no conuincing arguments of certainty of fayth , and doctrine , and in effect can shew no grounds sufficient in prudence to persuade any iudicious man to accept , as credible , the religion of Christiās , more then of Iewes , Turkes , or Pagans , therefore it cannot extend it selfe to all Nations , (a) enlarge the place of his Tents , stretch out the skins of his Tabernacles ; (b) increase the sea with knowledge ; (c) sucke the milke of Gentils , and be nursed with the Tette of Kings ; (d) it cannot conuert the multitude of Iles ; (e) bring in the riches of the Gentills ; (f) preach pennance , and remission of sinnes ; (g) from Hierusalem to the vttermost of the earth ; (h) from North to South , from Sabaoth to Sabaoth ; (i) from the ends of the earth . All which yet as they were promised to holy Church so are they performed in it , and by the spirit of God in it . Seauenthly , this spirit wanteth all warrant , and Commission from God , either expressed in holy Scripture , or mentioned in the Creed of the Apostles , or deliuered by any Tradition , or defined by any Councell , or contained in any rule of Fayth , or deduced out of any principle of Religion , or confirmed by any practise of antiquity , that all men must rely on it , be ruled by it , and be obedient to it for the certainty of their Fayth and Religion : we find no preheminence , or prerogatiue attributed to it , that it is either (a) the Kingdome , (b) the Citty , (c) the Inheritance , (d) the House , (e) the Temple , (f) the Spouse , or (g) the body of Christ ; which yet the Church of God , by his spirit in it , hath . We read of no authority it hath , either (h) to bind or loose sinnes , (i) or to offer sacrifice , or to minister Sacraments , or to instruct in all Truth ; (k) to teach all Nations , or to punish offenders with the Rodde of correction , of censure , of excommunication , & giuing vp to Sathan , which yet the Church of God by his spirit hath . We haue no expresse warrant , or commaund to do (l) what it shall say to vs , do ; to heare and obey it , as Christ himselfe , and that (m) vnder paine of despising Christ ; (n) of being an Ethnicke , and Publican , (o) and of damnation . All which yet we haue of the Church of Christ , and of the spirit of God , dwelling in it , and directing it . All which properties and conditions since they ought to be in a rule & iudge of faith , as is before shewed , and are all , and euery one wanting in this Protestant priuate spirit , as is heere manifest , it remaines euident , that for these reasons it cannot be a sufficient , or competent Iudge of all controuersies of Fayth and Religion . THE PROTESTANT PRIVATE SPIRITS AVTHORITY , To iudge of Controuersies of Fayth ; confuted by Reasons drawne from the nature , and certainty of Fayth . CHAP. VII . The properties of Fayth , with the priuate Spirits manner of proceeding . SECT . I. THIS priuate spirits authority to expound Scripture , and to resolue questions of Fayth , we haue confuted by reasons drawne from the nature of an infallible , both Interpreter of Scripture , and Iudge of fayth . It remaines , that we cōfute the same by reasons drawne frō the nature , and infallible certainty of Fayth , of which this spirit is assigned by the Protestāts to be a principall , if not a sole , and whole meanes , or instrument to cause it . For which we may note , that the Protestants doe 1. ground their saluation vpon only fayth , which say they , doth only iustify . 2. They ground this their fayth vpon only Scripture , which according to thē , containes al things necessary to be belieued . 3. They ground this their Scripture , and the sense of it , only vpon the priuate spirit , by which alone , excluding all authority of Tradition , Church-Councells , or Fathers , they expound the Scripture ; so that the priuate spirit is to them the principall , or sole ground of their sense of Scripture , their Scripture-sense , the principal or sole ground of their fayth , & this their fayth the principal or sole ground of their saluation . What certainty therefore they haue of Scripture , Fayth , or Saluation , dependes vpon the certainty they haue of this their spirit , which if it faile , and proue not to be true , and of God , but deceitfull , and of Sathan ; then failes with it , the truth of their sense of Scripture , the truth of their Fayth , and Religion , and the truth of their hope , or certainty of saluation . Whereupon it followes , 1. That they can haue no more certainty of their fayth , and saluation , then they haue of this their spirit , which is the ground of their fayth and saluation . 2. That what conditions , or properties are required to certainty of Fayth , the same are required in this spirit , which is to them the prime , mayne , & in effect the sole meanes , or grounds of faith . 3. That if we demonstrate , that the properties , and conditions which are necessary to fayth , are wanting in this priuate spirit , then we conuince that this priuate spirit cannot be , either a sufficient ground , wheron to build faith , or a competent Iudge , wherby to determine controuersies of Fayth . Which being supposed , let vs examine these properties of faith , what , and how many they be , and applying them to the priuat spirit , shew that they are all euery one wanting in it . 1. Therfore this diuine , and supernaturall faith , as it is necessary to saluation , ( for according to S. Paul , Without (a) faith , it is impossible to please God. And according to S. Augustine , It is certaine that none can come to true happinesse except he please God ; and hat none can please God , but by faith , for faith is the foundation of all good things , faith is the beginning of mans saluation , without faith none can come to the fellowship of the children of God , because without it , neither in this world doth any man obtaine the grace of iustification , nether in the next shal he possesse eternall life : ) so also it must necessarily haue these properties , or conditions , that is , it must be one , certaine , entire , and Catholike faith , manifested by diuine reuelation , di●ulged by Apostolicall mission , and preaching , confirmed by miraculous operations , and made credible by conuincing testimonies of credibility . All which , as they are peculiar to true faith , either connexed to it , or concurring with it ; so are they all wanting to this priuate spirit , and haue no affinity or similitude with it ; as in particuler shal be shewed . The priuate spirit cannot be a meane of vnity in Fayth . SECT . II. THEREFORE Fayth is one , witnes S. Paul , One Lord , one Baptisme , one Fayth : witnes S. Leo , Except it be one , it is not Fayth . Witnes Irenaeus , All belieuing in one and like manner all points ; all teaching & deliuering in one and the same manner all thinges ; and all hauing one soule , and one hart , which though it differ in language , yet is the same in tradition . One , I say , in all persons , both in the materiall obiect , because the same articles of Fayth are belieued by all ; and also in the formall obiect , because for the same motiue , and in the same manner , they are belieued by all , in all places , & tymes . Which one fayth , as one soule in many partes of the body , doth make one Church in all the partes of the world . But that this priuate spirit neither is , nor can be , one in all , who claime and challeng it , as neither inclining , and mouing them all to belieue , either one , and the same thing , or in one , and the same manner , or for one , and the same motiue : nor yet combining them in any vnity , either of one , and the same Church , or of one , and the same discipline , or gouernment , or of one , and the same scripture , and sense of it ; is apparent and proued . First , Because this spirit is priuate , proper , and peculiar in euery one , without subordination to any , without connexion with any , or without dependance vpon any . It is singular , and seuerall , in euery one , hauing a kind of operation , which is ; for the manner , singular ; for the motiue , different ; and for the effect , opposit in euery one . It wanteth one , and the same , either authority of God for warrant , or reuelation from God for motiue , or proposition by Church for surety ; or direction of one visible head for gouernment , as a linke and combination of all the spirits in one vnity , either of Sacraments , seruice , or ceremonies ; or of faith , discipline , and exposition of scripture . Wherupon it withdraweth al men from the high way of vnity , diuerts them into by-pathes of diuision , conducts them into the downfall of schisme , and heresy ; and so precipitates them headlong into a gulfe of infidelity , and perdition . 2. Because , as experience teaches vs , it hath hatched all the viperous sects , schismes , and heresies which this last age in such aboundance brought forth into the world . It vpon the first breathing of the new Ghospell , deuided the followers of it into Lutherans , Sacramentarians , & Anabaptists , and subdeuided the Lutherans againe into the Zealous , the Ciuill , and the disorderly Lutherans ; and subdeuided yet againe the zealous into 14. the ciuill into 20. and the disorderly into 7. subfactions and petty heresies . It subdeuided the Anabaptists into 13. seuerall factions : and the Sacramentaries into so many new opinions , in seuerall Countries , inuented by so many seuerall new maisters , as that within the space of an 100. years & fewer , some , as Gualter , reckon vp 117. others , as Rescius 170. & others , as Hedio a Protestāt , within 30. yeares after Luther 130. all inuented , and nourished by this spirit . And for multiplicity of scripture senses , it deuised , as one 50. yeares ago collected , no fewer then 80. and as another since hath obserued , no fewer then 200. seuerall expositions , all out of foure wordes , Hoc est corpus meum . Which dissention , and diuision was euen in Caluins time so memorable , and markable , that he himselfe confesses , that this age hath brought forth horrible monstrous sects , so that many staggering , and no● knowing which to follow , haue cast away all care of any religion at all . By which is apparent , that this Scripture neither doth , nor can beget any vnity , or concord in fayth and religion , and so cannot be a fit instrument to beget , and conserue fayth . That it cannot be a meanes of certainty of Fayth . SECT . III. SECONDLY , Fayth must be certaine , and infallible to vs , more certaine , sayth S. Chrysostome , are we of things we see not , then of thinges we see . Yea so certaine , as that it admits no deliberate and voluntary doubt , not only actuall , but not so much as possible . For as Fayth is an inward assent of the mind which we giue to that which God ( who is the prime verity , and can neither deceaue , nor be deceaued ) hath reuealed to vs by meanes of the preaching , and teaching of the true Church : so our assent must be as certaine as is the verity of God , vpon which it dependes ; that is , so certaine , that it admit no more deliberate doubt , incertainty , or fallibility , then doth the word of God , vpon which it depends . Which certainty of fayth , because Luther , Caluin , and Zuinglius extend to euery mans particuler saluation , they consequently affirme , that euery man must be as certaine of his saluation , as he is certaine there is a God , & that he can no more loose his saluation , then Christ can loose it . But that no such certainty can be in this priuate spirit , I proue ( besides that which is in the former Chapter shewed ) by these reasons . First , because no certaine and infallible rule , or ground can be giuen , certainly and infallibly to know that this spirit , in any man , is a spirit of truth , not of errour ; of light , not of darknes ; of God , not of Sathan , or not humane ; therfore there is no reason why any should build vpon it as certaine . Secondly , because that they who admit a certainty of it , admit it only in the persons who haue it , not in others who follow them who haue it ; wherupon all who follow the spirit , and doctrine of any other whosoeuer ( as the cōmon , both people , and preachers do ) follow that which to them is fallible and vncertaine , and so build vpon a ground fallible and vncertaine . Thirdly , because experience conuinces that this spirit hath deceaued , & doth daily deceaue many ; for whatsoeuer either sense of Scripture , or doctrine of faith , or certainty of saluation the spirit of one man doth certainly assure him as true , the spirit of another man doth as certainly assure him that the same is false : as for example , the spirit of Zuinglius , Oecolampadius ▪ Caluin , and other Sacramentaries assures them , that the sense of Hoc est corpus meum , is figuratiue , that the body of Christ is not really , and corporally present in the Sacrament , and that they in this faith are infallibly sure of their saluation : but the spirit of Luther assures him , that the sense of the words is literall , that Christs substance is really and corporally present with the substance of bread , and that the Sacramentaries are heretiks , and damned who hould the contrary . The like doth the spirit of the Anabaptists , Libertines , and others assure them of other such places against both Lutherans , and Caluinists . And the spirit of the Arians assures them of the like , against all the former . And all this is wrought by this spirit , all conceauing a certainty in it , & yet all opposit and condemning one another by it . What certainty therfore can there be in any of these spirits , what infallibility more in Luther then in Caluin , what in Caluin more then in Rotman , what in Rotman more then in Seruetus , or what in any one of them more then in any other Sectary ? What can any one claime , or challenge for the certainty of his spirit , which the other cannot as infallibly claime , and challenge for the certainty of his ? Euery one of these assure themselues that their spirit is of God. Euery one of them , & all are certaine of their sense of scripture , of their faith , and of their saluation by it , & yet euery one defends a contrary faith , inuents a contrary sense of scripture , condemns the contrary part of heresy , & is certaine by his spirit of the others damnation ; as the other conceaue themselues certaine of their owne saluatiō . What certainty therfore can there be amongst so opposit certainties ? Surely none , but to be certaine , that all of these spirits are most vncertaine and fallible , yea wicked , and damnable ; & that the state of all who depend of them , is pittifull and miserable . That it cannot be meanes of the integrity , and perfection of Faith SECT . IIII. THIRDLY , Faith as it is one and certaine , so it must be entire and Catholicke , that is , the doctrine of it must both in all points be wholy and entirely belieued , & also by all persons be vniuersally and Catholikly professed . It must be in all , and euery point completely belieued , because euery point by God reuealed , and by the Church proposed to vs , is of equall verity , certainty , and necessity of beliefe . Therefore as the keeping of all the Commandmēts doth oblige all , and the breaking of any one , is a transgression of the Law : so the belieuing of all articles of faith , either actually and expresly , as the learned doe ; or virtually and implicite as the vnlearned do ( who expresly belieuing the principall and most necessary to be expresly knowne , do in not doubting or oppugning the rest , virtually belieue al the rest , in that they belieue them as the Church doth teach them ) doth in like manner oblige all ; and the voluntary doubting , or misbelieuing of any one , is an heresy against fayth , and doth violate the integrity which should be in Fayth : of which the fundamentall reason is , because all articles of fayth are belieued for one and the same infallible motiue and reason , that is , for the reuelation of God made knowne by infallible proposition of the Church , of which whosoeuer denies the authority in one point , infringes the infallibility of the same in all points ; for if the reuelation of God , or proposition of Church may faile in one , it may faile in all , & so can giue no certainty of any Out of which followes , that an Heretikes , who obstinatly misbelieues one article reuealed and proposed , is intensiuè no lesse an Infidell , that is , as destitute of any diuine fayth , as is ● Pagan , who belieues not any one Christian article at all ; because what he belieues in any , he belieues not vpon a right true and solid motiue of beliefe , that is , the reuelation of God , and proposition by Church , which if he did , he would for the same belieue also the rest . It must likewise be Catholikly and vniuersally belieued , that is , what was by the first faythfull , the Apostles , & others in the first ages belieued , must also be by the succeeding faythfull in the next ages likewise belieued ; and what is in most places , and Countryes , and hath been by the most faythfull in most Countryes generally belieued , the same must also by others likewise faythfull in other Countryes be generally belieued . By which Catholik beliefe of the same doctrine in all , or the most places , persons , and tymes , is made one Catholike Church among all persons , in all places , and all tymes . But that this Protestant priuate spirit cannot produce any such one , and the same fayth , either entire , and whole in euery point , or Catholicke and generall in all persons , places , and tymes ; that it cannot incline all persons , in all tymes , and places , to belieue all points of one entire Catholike fayth , is proued . First , because it is neither one in all persons , neither hath any lincke or combination of any vnity , to combine in one all persons , as neither proposing to all persons all articles of fayth by one & the same motiue , nor combining all persons dispersed in tyme , and place , in one lincke of one Fayth ; for it is singular , seuerall , priuate , and proper in euery one , without any subordination , or connexion among any , as is apparent by the former instāces of Luther , Zuinglius , Caluin , Rotman , Osiander , Illyricus , Quintinus , Seruetus , Blandrata , and others ; who all , as so many ruptures out of one Riuer , hauing broke the bankes of Catholike vnity , did at seuerall tymes , and places , diuide themselues into seuerall currents of opposition , and runne al a course contrary one to another without meanes , or hope of euer meeting , or reuniting againe . Secondly , because it is a spirit of separation , diuision , and disunion ; in that , whomesoeuer it possesses , it doth separate them as disioynted members from the vnion of Gods holy Church , the spouse and body of Christ ; and doth diuide , and cut them into seuerall peeces and mammocks of sects , schismes , and heresyes . For as euery one receaues a new part , or portion of this new spirit , he chooses to himselfe a new opinion of doctrine , labours to erect and set vp a new Conuenticle of new belieuers , and makes himselfe the head or follower of a new sect , or heresy ; and so all sect-maisters or Heretikes , who in all ages from Christ downewardes , haue separated themselues from his Church and erected a new fayth and Synagogue , haue had their origen and beginning from this spirit , haue made their progresse and proceeding by this spirit , and haue ended themselues and their dolefull and desperate presumption in the obstinacy of this spirit . In all which the scope and marke they aymed at , was thereby to free themselues from all order and subiection , thereby to arrogate to themselues all authority , and dominion ; thereby to exercise what liberty they best affected , and to belieue and teach what doctrine they most fancied , and best fitted their conceit & humour . Thirdly , because this spirit is inuisible , insensible , inperceptible , and vnable to be knowne , or vnderstood ( as they graunt ) by others , or any , saue only they who imagine they are possessed with it . And as it is inuisible and vnknowne , so it is composed of an inuisible and vnknowne company , meeting in inuisible and vnknowne congregations , ministring inuisible and vnknowne Sacraments , making an inuisible and vnknowne Church , consisting of inuisible and vnknowne both Pastors who preached , and people who heard the doctrine of it for many ages togeather , of which they can assigne neither tyme when , nor place where , nor people who were taught by them ; can produce no acts , or monuments , no recordes , or registers either of people who belieued , & professed this their faith , or of Princes who did honour and defend it , or of persecutours who did oppose and persecute it , or of any men , women , or children who were baptized , and liued , or dyed in it . They can nominate no Citty , or Country , no Priest , or Prelate , no Prince or Potentate , no Confessour or Martyr , who belieued , professed , honoured , and defended in paper , or pulpit , by word , or sword , the fayth of this spirit : and why ? Because the directour is a spirit inuisible , which compasseth a Church of persons insensible , who preach a doctrine incredible , and performe actions not memorable . All which is nothing els , but an inuinsible argument of an impossible fiction , inuented in the idle braines of braine-sicke spirits to disguise the nouelty of a new , & new deuised Religion . And this is all the integrity or vniuersality of Fayth , that this priuate spirit can effect or affoard . That it cannot be a meanes of Fayth which is got by hearing . SECT . V. FOVRTLY , This Faith which is thus one and certaine , thus entire and Catholicke , is also ordinarily by one and the same way and meanes , imparted vnto vs , that is , by Hearing : this hearing proceeds from Preaching , & this preaching is deriued frō Mission , according to that of S. Paul , How shal they belieue him whom they haue not heard ? how shall they heare without a preacher ? how shall they preach except they be sent ? So that faith it by hearing , hearing is by preaching of Pastours , and preaching is by mission from the authority of Superiours . Of which the reason is , because faith is an argumēt or proofe of things that do not appeare , either to our sense , or reason , but are aboue our vnderstanding , and capacity ; therfore we cannot attaine to it by euidence of reason , but by credit of authority . To this authority , that we may giue credit , we must conceaue , and heare it ; this hearing , that we may be obliged to accept it , must by Church-Pastors be proposed , and preached to vs ; and this preaching , that it may the better secure vs of it , must be from lawfull mission by ordinary succession deriued ; and so lawfull mission from apostolical authority , infallible preaching or proposition of Pastours , and a pious disposition in vs to heare and belieue what is thus proposed , are the meanes by which , according to S. Paul , true faith is attained . But this priuat spirit quite ouerthrowes all this excellēt order , and subordination ordayned by Christ Iesus , & proposed to vs by the holy Ghost . For first , it alone without any disposition of hearing , without any proposition , or preaching of Church Pastours , without any authority of apostolicall mission , and ordination , teaches and directs , in particuler , euery one , man , woman , or child , which is true Scripture , which is true sense of it , and which is true doctrine collected out of it , therfore euery one thus made faithfull by this spirit , stands need neither of disposition to heare what is to be belieued , nor of preaching to belieue what they heare , nor of mission , and ordination to secure them of what is preached ; because this spirit supplies the effect of all both ordination , proposition , and disposition of hearing , therfore all order and discipline , all subordination , and subiection , all sacraments , or preaching , are needlesse , yea fruitlesse in Gods Church . As this spirit secures alone ; so without Sacraments it sanctifies alone . As it instructs all in faith ; so it corrects all in errours against faith ▪ And as it is directed by none , but God ; so it is subordinate to none , but God alone , obliged to none , obedient to none ; it is immediate ( as they which haue it imagine ) from God , & it wil be subiect only to God , it will be directed only by God ; it alone inspires all what they are to belieue , alone works all what they are to do , and alone secures all that they cannot faile of their end and saluation ; and so alone to all is all in all , that is , the beginning , progresse , and end of all grace and goodnesse . Thus is the spirit to them , if you will credit them . Secondly , It alone hath warrant , and commission , power , and authority , in whomsoeuer it is , whether he be yonge or old , simple or wise , vnlearned or learned , secular or spirituall , to examine & censure , to giue sentence , and iudgment in any cause or Controuersy , ouer any Pastour , or Prelate , vpon any Councell or Church , particuler or generall , present or past , late or auncient . For as Caluin , and Kemnitius , for example , by the prerogatiue of this their spirit , tooke vpon them to censure and correct , by their Examine and Antidote , not only the late generall Councel of Trent , but also the auncient generall Councels of Nice , Constantinople , Chalcedon , and Ephesus , yea & the whole Church of God , and all Doctours in it for many ages togeather , ( as is before shewed ; ) so euery bible-bearing Ghospeller , who hath got but a tast of this spirit , and can but read the Scripture in English , will by the same prerogatiue of this spirit , assume to himselfe the same authority to examine the same examiners , to censure the same censurers , and to iudge the spirit of the former iudges , yea to examine , censure , and iudge all Pastours , Doctours , Fathers , Councells , and Churches , and to determine which of them haue erred , what sense of Scripture is to be preferred , and what Fayth , and Religion is to be imbraced . All which as these new Protestant Maisters first practised vpon the ancient Fathers ; so these their new discipls haue learned to practise the same vpon them their maisters , and do as well censure them , as they did their Predecessours : and that worthily ; for what they taught and practised against their Fathers , is a iust punishment that their children should learne , and practise the same against them . That it cannot be a meanes of fayth , which requirs credible testimonies . SECT . VI. FIFTHLY , this fayth as it is obtained by piously hearing the infallible preaching of Pastours lawfully ordained and sent ; so also it requires , besides diuine reuelation , reasons and motiues of credibility , forcible to moue the Vnderstanding to accept , as probable , this doctrine of Fayth , thus by preaching proposed , and by God reuealed : for ( as before ) He that giueth credit quickly , is light of hart . And reasons of credibility ( such as are miracles , sanctity , vnity , conuersions of Nations , and such like , before mentioned ) doe make a true fayth more credible , according to that of Dauid : Thy testimonies are made too credible . But that this priuate spirit cannot giue any such credible testimonies , or produce any probable motiue to conuince any one , that it is a true spirit of God , or a certaine meanes of faith , is proued ; Because it cannot alledge any consent of people , and nations , nor any authority of miracles , to vse S. Augustines words , nourished by hope , increased by charity , and confirmed by antiquity , such as confirmed S. Augustine in his faith it : cannot alleadge any vnity which it causeth either with the head , Christ , or with his body , the Church ; not any sanctity which it worketh , by works memorable for piety , or miraculous for power and vertue ; not any consent of vniuersality , by which it hath been imbraced in all places , at all times , by all nations , and persons , no not in ancient time , by any persons renowned for holinesse and learning ; not any succession of Pastours , prelates , doctours , or saints who haue relied themselues , their faith , & saluation vpon it : it cannot produce any one euident , either authority of holy scripture , or any one tradition of apostolicall time , or any one practise of auncient Church , or any one decree of generall Councels , or any one testimony of learned Doctours , or any one probable , much lesse conuincing argument of reason , that either all , or any one man must , or may settle his beliefe in it , interprete the Scripture by it , rely his saluation vpon it , deduce all resolutions of fayth , all questions of Controuersies , all doubts of Religion from it , and giue peremptory iudgment and sentence of all Pastours and Prelates , of all Saints and Doctours , of all Churches and Councells , of all doctrine and religion , according to the suggestion of it , which yet the precise Protestāts do both in doctrine professe , and in practise performe . That it cannot be a meanes of fayth , which obliges all to belieue and accept it . SECT . VII . SIXTHLY , fatyh , to whome it is by God reuealed , by Church proposed , and by credible testimonyes conuinced , obligeth them to accept it , and to giue credit , and testimony to it , to be directed and ordered by it , and to submit their iudgement in obedience of fayth vnto it , according to that of S. Paul , bringing into (a) Captiuity all vnderstanding vnto the obedience of Christ ; and (b) as children of obedience , (c) receauing grace for obedience to the fayth . Whereupon it is sayd , (d) He that doth not belieue , shal be condemned . Because when it is sufficiently deliuered & declared what we are to belieue , and do , they who by negligence do not imbrace and follow it , are inexcusable , and so deserue damnation . And as they who are obliged to attaine to the end , are obliged to vse & apply the meanes necessary for that end , without which the end cannot be attained ; so , because we Catholikes for our part , do hould a pious disposition to heare that which is authentically preached , and proposed by Pastours lawfully ordained : And because the Protestants , for their part , do hold the motion , and suggestion of the priuate spirit to be a necessary meanes for the attaining vnto fayth ; it followes that as the one is bound to giue audience , and obedience to al preaching of Pastours lawfully sent , and proposition of Church defining what is to be belieued and practised ; so the other is bound to heare and obey euery motion , and suggestion of this their priuate spirit speaking in them , and inspiring them what to do , and belieue . But that this spirit cannot vnder any precept naturall , or diuine , oblige any one , much lesse all men to accept , credit , and rely vpon it , and to make it their rule , and foundation ; their iudge , and vmpier , the assurer and securer of their scripture-sense , their fayth , their religion , and their saluatiō ; as it is of it selfe more euident ; so by these reasons it is confirmed . First , because as it is often before touched , no man hath any certaine meanes , or ground , wheron to build a certaine resolution of the certainty , either of this spirit , or of euery motion of it , that it is of God , not of nature , or Sathan . 2. Because no such precept is intimated in any Scripture , Tradition , Councel , or Church-command . 3. Because it would follow , that men should be obliged to belieue and follow spirits contrary , and motions of them contrary , and so senses of Scripture contrary , Fayths and Religions contrary , and opinions of saluation contrary : for as Luther had one spirit , and one motion of it ; Caluin another spirit , and a contrary motion of it ; Osiander a third spirit , and an opposit motion of it : & so ●n like manner Swenkfeldius , Rotman , Seruetus , Quintinus , Dauid-george , Moore , Hacket , and an hundred more Sectaryes , had euery one of them distinct spirits , and contrary motions of them in the sense of Scripture which they expounded , in the articles of their fayth which they belieued , and in the certainty of their saluation vpon which they presumed ; so euery one being obliged to belieue and follow their owne spirit , & the motion of it , in the Scripture-sense , fayth and saluation ; diuers should be obliged to belieue , and follow contrary spirits , and contrary motions of contrary spirits , and so contrary senses of Scripture , contrary faithes and religions , and contrary certainty of saluation , which is as absurd , as in religion absurd may be . Also , because as the wind blowes , so the spirit moues , sometymes one way , sometymes another , sometymes to this thing , sometymes to to the contrary , suggesting now one meaning of Scripture , now another , now one Fayth , then another , and sometymes doubts of all Faith , and suggests no fayth at all , & often dispaires of all grace , and leaues no hope of assurance of any saluation at all : It would likewise follow that men should be obliged sometimes to belieue no fayth at all , sometymes to dispaire of all grace , goodnes , and saluation , and sometymes to haue as deep a conceit of their damnation , as other tymes they haue of their saluation . Whereby still following a wauering spirit , and tottering motions of it , they should wauer and totter betweene vncertaintyes , and contrarietyes , and remaine alwayes vncertaine in themselues , and contrary to others , and so be like Cloudes without water , carryed with euery ayre , like waues of the Sea tossed with euery wind , foaming out their owne confusion , like wandering stars , to whome a storme of darkenesse is reserued for euer . And thus much of reasons drawne from the nature , and properties of Fayth , which may suffice to conuince , that this priuate spirit , and the motion of it , are so farre from being any necessary meanes of Fayth , and Religion , that they cannot so much as consist with any , but are opposite to all true Fayth and Religion . THE PRIVATE SPIRITS AVTHORITY To iudge of Fayth ; confuted by circular absurdities which follow thereupon , in the groundes of their Fayth . CHAP. VIII . Of the nature of a Circle , and the differences of Circles . SECT . I. NOTHING doth make more pl●ine , to a plaine vnderstanding , the absurdity of this priuate spirit , then the absurdities which doe follow vpon it , against both faith , & reason . These absurdities are of two sortes . The one Circular , inuoluing an absurd manner of proofe , & proceeding by way of a Circle , condemned by all principles of Philosophy , and Diuinity . The other Doctrinall ( as we may tearme them ) inferring a doctrine absurd , and dissonant from all principles of Fayth , piety , and reason . In this Chapter we will shew the Circular absurdities , in the next the Doctrinall which doe follow vpon this priuate spirit , and the Protestants doctrine taught by it . For the Circular absurdities we may note . 1. Of a circle , what a Circle , and a Circular proofe is . 2. The difference betweene a circular proofe lawfull , & vnlawfull : & 3. therby iudge , and make an estimate of the Catholike and Protestant mutuall obiection , the one against the other in this kind . First therefore Aristotle , in his demonstrations hauing proued that in euery demonstration we must come to some principles or propositions imediatly knowne of themselues , and not demonstrable by another medium , or proposition ; disproues two sortes of Philosophers , the one affirming that there can be no demonstration of any thing at all ; the other contrariwise affirming that there may be demonstrations of euery thing euē of the first principles or propositions , which by a circular demonstration ( say they ) , may be demonstrated by the conclusion , as the conclusion is demonstrated by the premises ; admitting therby a Circular demonstration of the conclusion by the premises , and of the premises againe by the conclusion . This latter errour of Circular proofe he cōfutes by three reasons . 1. Because it would be petitio principij , or the begging of the question , which , as before in his former bookes of Resolution , he resolued , was when the medium , or proposition prouing any thing , is either the same which is to be proued , or more obscure , or as obscure , or knowne after the thing to be proued . All which inconueniences this Circular manner of probation doth inferre , making the probation either the same , or equally , or more obscure then the thing to be proued . 2. Because it would follow , that idem should be prius & posterius , notius & ignotius respectu eiusdem , knowne & vnknowne , first knowne and after knowne in respect of the same . As when the premises do demonstrate the conclusion they must be first and better knowne then the Concl●sion . And againe ▪ when the conclusion doth demonstrate the premises it should be first and better knowne then the premises & so the same conclusion shal be prius & notius , as demonstrating the premises , and posterius & ignotius , as demonstrated and proued by the premises , both being vnderstood of the same premises . 3. Because this Circular proofe , is to proue the same to be the same , because it is the same ; as the conclusion to be true , if it be true , or because it is true . As ( saith Aristotle ) Si A est , B est ; si B est , A est ; ergo , si A est , A est . In which as A is proued to be A , because it is A ; so the conclusion is proued to be true , because it is true . Whereupon Aristotle concludes , that euery Circular proofe and demonstration which is regressus ab eodem ad omnino idem , that is , when we returne frō one thing to the same thing againe , and from one proofe to the same proofe againe , is vitious and vnlawfull in Logicke . And thus much of the nature of a Circle . Secondly , for the difference betweene a proper Circle , which is bad , and an improper which is good and lawfull , we may note also , that euery kind of Circular and reciprocall proofe is not vnlawfull ; for some is reciprocall betweene the cause and the effect , as betweene rationale and risibile , betweene the Sunne & the Day . And thus may be proued the effect by the cause à priori , as Est risibile quia est rationale : est dies quia Sol lucet ; or on the contrary , the cause by the effect à posteriori , as Est rationale quia est risibile : or Sol lucet quia est dies . Other proofes are reciprocall betweene two causes of diuers kindes , as betweene the efficient cause and the finall , in which sense we proue Phisicke to be good because , as the efficient cause , it causeth and worketh health ; and health to be good , because as the finall cause , or end it moueth to take Phisicke . Or betweene the efficient and materiall cause , as when we proue the entrance of the wind to be the cause , that is efficient of opening the window , and the opening of the window to be the cause that is materiall of the entrance of the wind . Or when we proue the aboundance of raine by the aboundance of vapours , as by the materiall cause ; and the aboundance of vapours , by the aboundance of raine , as by the effect . All which kind of reciprocall or Circular proofe , of the cause by the effect , and the effect by the cause , or of one cause by another , is good and allowed in Logicke , as being improperly a Circle . Only that which is disallowed , and by Aristotle , & all condemned , is that proper manner of Circle , which is , 1. when in the same kind of cause one thing is proued by another , and this againe by the former , which is either idem per idem , or ignotum per ignotius . 2. When this reciprocall proofe is made by one and the same cause , in one and the same manner of proofe . 3. When to one , and the selfe same person this one thing is thus proued by another , and this againe by the former , the one mutually prouing the other : as when the premises demonstrate the conclusion , and the conclusion againe the premises , both being otherwise vnknowne . As when the maister proues the seruant to be innocent , and the seruant the maister , both being before suspected as guilty . In which the same thing is notius & ignotius , prius & posterius , that is , more knowne and lesse knowne , first knowne and after knowne , both in one and the same respect , and in respect of one and the same person , and so a thing vnknowne is proued by another more vnknowne , which is that vnlawfull Circle or Circular manner of demonstration disallowed and condemned by Aristotle . By which is manifest what a Circular proofe is , and of Circular manners of proofes , which is improper & lawfull , and which proper and vnlawfull . Thirdly , Both Catholicks and Protestantes , do mutually accuse one another of this vicious and Circular arguing , and manner of proofe . The Protestants accuse the Catholicks because they proue the authority of the scripture by the authority of the Church , and the authority of the Church by the authority of scripture . For aske a Catholicke how he knowes the Scripture to be infallible and true , he will answer , because the Church tels him it is so : aske him how he proues the Church to be infallible and true , he wil answer because the scripture sayes it is so ; and so he proues the Scripture by the Church , and the Church by the Scripture . The Catholicks accuse the Protestants because they proue the scripture by the spirit , and the spirit by the scripture : for aske a Protestant how he knowes the scripture to be true , and the true sense of it , he answers because the spirit so tels and assures him : aske him how he knowes the spirit that it is of God , and speakes truth , he answers because the scripture tels and assures him so ; and so he knowes the Scripture by the spirit , and the spirit by the Scripture . The Catholikes cleared from the obiected Circle , against their doctrine . SECT . II. THE question therefore is , whether the Catholiks betweene Scripture and Church , or the Protestants betweene the Scripture and the Spirit , and otherwise , do fall into this kind of vitious argumentation , and proofe , in māner of a Circle . And that the Catholikes are free from this fault , and do make their proofe to seuerall sortes of persons in seuerall kinds of causes , & by a partiall manner of proofe , and thereby do still proue one thing vnknowne by another more knowne to those persons , is first to be proued . For which we may note , that the Catholikes require to Fayth ( for so much as is for our purpose ) two thinges . First , a preparation , to prepare vs to accept the thinges belieued as credible , and in prudence worthy to be belieued , which is wrought by credible testimonyes , such as are miracles , consent , sanctity , antiquity , and the rest before mētioned , by which our vnderstanding is euidently conuinced to iudge and accept of the Christian Religion , as more worthy or credit then any other . Secondly , they require a firme assent or beliefe to the articles of fayth , proposed as true , and of infallible verity , which is wrought by the habit of fayth , and dependes vpon the diuine reuelation of God , declaring in Scripture , or Tradition , and proposing by holy Church , what , and why we are to belieue : vpon which reuelation thus proposed , we settle our last resolution of fayth , and the certainty of it , as vpon the former credible motiues , or humane fayth we setled our preparation , or acceptation of fayth , and the credibility of it . Now , if we compare or apply these togeather , it will euidently appeare , that in neither is committed any Circle , because the former , that is , the acceptation depends vpon credible motiues which are as the Samaritan womans word , making it seeme probable that Christ was the Messias ; and the later , that is the assent to Fayth , dependes ●pon diuine reuelation , which is as our Sauiours word reuealing to them , that he is the true Messias , and so both haue seuerall grounds and principles on which they depend ; the one credible testimonies , the other diuine reuelation : wherby comparing them togeather , no appearance of any circular proofe can be found betweene them . For the actuall assent and beliefe it selfe , whereby we infallibly belieue the mysteries reuealed , though we belieue the verity of Scripture reuelations by the authority of Church proposition , and Church proposition for the authority of Scripture reuelation , whereby Scripture reuelation doth giue vs testimony of Church proposition , and againe Church proposition of Scripture reuelation ; Yet that this reciprocall testimony and proofe , is not any proper and vitious Circle , is proued . First , because it is in diuerso genere causa , in diuers kinds of causes ( which before out of Aristotle is admitted for good and lawfull : ) for the testimonyes of Scripture reuelation to the infallibility of Church proposition is causall as a cause , and that formall , why we belieue and assent to Church proposition . But Church proposition is only conditionall , as conditio sine quae non , to know Scripture reuelation ; and so they are reciprocall in a different manner of proofe , the one , that is Scripture , à priori , as including diuine reuelation ; the other , that is Church , à posteriori , required only as a condition . The former , as a formall precedent cause ; the latter , as a subsequent annexed condition . Both of them not much vnlike to our Sauiours testimony of S. Iohn Baptist , and to S. Iohns testimony of our Sauiour : the one as of God and infallible , the other as of an holy man , & credible : or to the testimony of our B. Sauiour , & the woman to the Samaritans : the one as giuing certainty , the other as proposing credibility of his being the Messias : Or to the former example of rationale and risibile , of the Sun-shine and the Day , of the Vapours and Raine , of the opening the Window and the entring of the Wind. All which reciprocally proue one another , as the cause and the effect , or as seuerall causes . And all which doe much resemble the testimony of Scripture to the Church , and of the Church to the Scripture , which is likewise in a seuerall kind of causality , and a different manner of probation . Secondly , because this reciprocall proofe is not ad omnino idem , as Aristotle requires to a proper Circle , that is , the one is not the totall and sole cause of knowing the other . For Church proposition is not knowne only by Scripture reuelation , and no other way ; but also by other proofes , signes , and credible testimonies , conuincing that Church authority is necessary and infallible to distinguish true sense of Scripture from false , and to end Controuersies about Scripture . And therefore as Aristotle admits , that though the premises haue proued the conclusion , yet the conclusion may againe proue the premises , & that in eodem genere causae , so that the conclusion be proued by another medium then by the premises . So , though the Scripture reuelation proue Church proposition , yet Church proposition may againe reciprocally proue Scripture reuelation , so it be knowne by another meanes ( as we see it is ) then only by Scripture reuelation ; for this , according to Aristotle , is only an improper Circle , and not a bad , and vnlawfull Circle . Thirdly , because this reciprocall proofe is not to one & the same person who is ignorant or doubtful of both : but to diuers persons , and such as suppose the one . For to a Catholike who admits , as belieued , Church propositiō , we proue by it Scripture-sense , or reuelation , and so an vnknowne thing to him , by another thing supposed and knowne to him : but to a Protestant who admits , as by him belieued , Scripture reuelation , we proue by it Church proposition , & so to him a thing vnknowne by another more knowne . But to a Pagan who admits neither Scripture reuelation , nor Church proposition , we proue neither of them one by another , but both the one and the other by other probable motiues and credible testimonies , more agreeable to his natural capacity , and by them persuade him , first to accept as credible , Church proposition , and by it Scripture reuelation : by which Scripture and Church , or scripture expounded by Church , we persuade him to assent , and belieue the articles reuealed . In all which we proue ignotum per notius , the vnknowne by the more knowne to him , and so preparing him to giue credit to one , do by that induce him to belieue the other . By which meanes , we still proceed from a thing knowne , to an vnknowne to that person , and so auoyd the Circle , and begging of the question , into which the Protestants runne , and there sticke fast . In which , note the difference betweene them and vs , for they proue reciprocally and circularly the Scripture by the spirit , and the spirit againe by scripture in the same kind of proofe , to wit formally , as shal be shewed : We proue scripture by Church , and Church by scripture , in diuers kindes of cause , to wit , the one causall , and the other conditionall , as is shewed . 2. They proue the one by the other , no otherwise knowne then by the other , as the scripture by the spirit , which spirit is only , and by no other meanes , knowne then by scripture , and é contra , as shal be shewed : But we haue more means to know the Church then by scripture , as is shewed . 3. They proue one by the other to the same person , to wit the Protestant , doubtfull of both : we to diuers persons who suppose & belieue the one , & so ( ad hominem ) by that we proue the other . Al which as it is true as presently shal be shewed , so it shewes an apparent difference between the Protestant circular māner of proofe of scripture by spirit , and of spirit by scripture ; and of our Catholike improper Circle , and lawfull manner of proofe of scripture by Church , and of Church by scripture . And thus much to cleare the imputation layd vpon Catholikes for their circular manner of proceeding in their proofe of scripture by the Church , and of Church by scripture . The Protestants diuers manners of Circles . SECT . III. SVBDIV. ● . The Circle betweene the Scripture , and the Spirit . IT remaynes to shew , that the Protestants doe seuerall wayes fall into this vnlawfull Circular manner of probation , for which we may note , how the Protestants for their doctrine of fayth , iustification , and saluation , do make this gradation & concatenation of one point with another . The first ground of all , they make Gods free and irrespectiue election , or predestination of some to his grace and saluation , & his like reiection & condemnation of others to damnation . 2. To these elect , and only to them , God giues true fayth , and certaine assurance of their saluation . 3. To these faythfull , & only to them , he giues the infallible assistance of this his priuate spirit . 4. To this spirit , and only to it , he giues the true and certaine vnderstanding of the holy Scipture , & the sense of it . So that 1. Election , 2. Fayth , 3. The spirit , 4. Vnderstanding of Scripture , is as a chaine of many lincks , whereof all are so connected , euery one with another , as he that hath one , hath all ; and he that wantes one , wantes all . For ( say they ) the vnderstanding of scripture is giuen only to them , and to all them who haue the spirit ; the spirit is giuen only to them , and to all them , who haue fayth ; Fayth is giuen only to them , and to all them , who are elect ; and so all , and only the elect , are faithfull ; all , and only the faithfull , haue the spirit ; all ▪ and only they that haue the spirit , vnderstand Scripture . And so à primo ad vltimum , all , & ōly the elect , must haue true fayth , spirit , and vnderstanding of Scripture . In which , election is the mother and foundation ; the vnderstāding of Scripture , the fruit & top of al their perfection . This is the connexion of their doctrine concerning their faith and saluation . Now as cōcerning the knowledge & infallible assurance of all these , which ( according to their groundes ) euery one of them must haue of himselfe , to wit , that he is elect , faithfull , and hath the true spirit of God , & the right vnderstanding of scripture : As concerning ( I say ) the assurance of all these , and the meanes of this assurance , whereupon depends their saluation ; if any shall demand of them , whereupon they ground this their certainty , and assurance of all these , that is , their election , fayth , spirit , & scripture-sense ( which are inseparable , and infallibly according to them , ensuing one vpon another ) it will appeare by their answere , that they haue no groundes at all ; but that they runne in a round , and Circle , rowling and wheeling from one ground or principle to another , and from that to the former backe againe , without any firme or setled groūd and resolution whereon to stay themselues , and their fayth ; whereupon they skip forward and backward , from one to another , that is , from the scripture to the spirit , and from the spirit to the scripture againe ; from the spirit to fayth , & from faith to the spirit againe ; from faith to election , and from election to fayth againe ; and so from election to scripture againe , and from scripture to election backe againe . For aske a Protestant , how , and by what meanes he vnderstands the Scripture ? He answers ; by the spirit . And aske him , how , and by what meanes he knowes that he hath the true spirit ? He answers by Scripture . And so knowes the scripture by the spirit , and the spirit by scripture . Againe , aske him how , and by what meanes he is assured of his faith ? He answers by his spirit , and scripture : but how is he sure of his spirit and scripture ? by his fayth backe againe . Further , aske him how , and by what meanes he is assured of his election ? He answers by his fayth , his spirit , or the scripture , and yet his election is the ground of his fayth , spirit , and vnderstanding of scripture . So that , 1. The scripture proues the spirit , and the spirit the scripture . 2. The spirit proues his fayth , and his fayth the spirit . 3. His faith proues his election , and his election is the ground of his fayth , & with it , of his spirit , and knowledge of scripture also . So that as many linckes as are in their chaine , so many Circles and circular proofes are made by them , and all in vaine , and to no purpose at all , as shall be shewed . And first of their first circular proofe , betweene the scripture and the spirit , it shal be plainely proued , that they fall directly and headlong into Aristotles proper , and so much condemned Circle , prouing the scripture by the spirit , and the spirit by the scripture againe , in one and the same kind of cause , to one and the same person , and by one sole and whole manner of proofe . In all which we haue before cleared our selues , and our doctrine from the obiected Circle against vs. For which we may obserue two principles of Protestant doctrine : the one , that the scripture only is the rule and meanes to come to the knowledge of the certainty of all thinges to be belieued ; wherupon they reiect all Tradition & vnwritten word of God , and rely only vpon the written word for the sole and complete rule of fayth . The other , that this written word is to be interpreted , and vnderstood only by the spirit of the Lord , which , as it is particuler and priuate in euery man , so euery man must be directed by his priuate spirit in the vnderstanding and interpreting of the scripture , and in the collecting out of it what he is to belieue ; wherupō they reiect all authority of Church , Councels , or Fathers , and make only the priuate spirit the Rule and Iudge of interpreting scripture , as in the first part is at large proued . Which being supposed , it will euidently appeare , how the Protestants runne this Circle , betweene this priuate spirit , and scripture . For aske a Protestant , how he knowes infallibly which is scripture , and which is true sense of it ? He answeres , by the internal testimony of the priuate spirit assuring him it is so . Aske him , how he infallibly knowes this his internall testimony of his spirit , is the testimony of the holy Ghost ? He answers , by the scripture assuring him it is so ; for my sheep heare my voice . Aske him againe , how he knowes infallibly this is scripture , and this the true meaning of this scripture ? He runnes backe to the testimony of his spirit . And againe , how he knowes that this his testimony of his spirit is the spirit of God ? He returnes to the scripture againe . Thus he wheeles in a round betweene scripture and spirit , prouing the scripture by the spirit , and the spirit by the scripture ; an vnknowne spirit by an vnknowne scripture , and an vnknowne scripture by an vnknowne spirit , one vnknowne , by another as vnknowne . And if Aristotle did hould it an absurd demonstration & proof to proue the Conclusion by the premises , and the premises againe by the conclusion in the same manner of proofe , which was , as he reasons , as much as to proue A by B , and againe B by A. which is either idem per seipsum , or ignotum per aequè ig notum ; And if S. Augustine did count it absurd for the Manichees to proue their Fundamental Epistle to be Canonicall , because Manes held it to be so , and Manes to be a Prophet or Apostle , because his Fundamētall Epistle did affirme him to be so , wherein he himselfe gaue testimony to his Epistle , and his Epistle to him ; as the maister giues to the seruant , and the seruant to the maister , when both are in question ; And if it were absurd for any to belieue Simon Magus and Selena , or Hellena , or Montanus and his Priscilla and Maximilla Prophetesses , or Mahomet and his Sergius the Arian to be true Prophets , because one did affirme and proue the other his companion to be a Prophet , both being suspected and vnknowne , and both wanting other kind of proofe , then mutuall and Circular affection one of another : Then in like manner , it is as great absurdity and folly for one to belieue the scripture and sense of it , because the priuate spirit affirmes it to be the true sense ; and againe the priuate spirit to be the true spirit of God , because the Scripture interpreted by that priuate spirit , affirmes it to be so . In which manner of proofe , all the conditions do concurre , which Aristotle requires to a proper and vnlawfull Circle , or circular demonstration . For 1. They proue circularly and reciprocally one another , as the spirit proues the scripture , and the scripture againe the spirit , in which is regressus ab eodem ad idem . 2. They proue circularly one another in eodem genere causae , for the spirit is the formall cause , why they belieue the sense of the scripture , and that sense of scripture is the formall cause , why they belieue that to be the spirit of God. 3. They proue one another totally and wholy , that is , the sole and whole reason why they belieue that is the sense of scripture , is the spirit ; and the sole & whole reason why they belieue this is the spirit , is that sense of Scripture framed by that spirit . 4. They proue one another not only circularly , wholy , and in the same manner of causes , but also to one and the same person . For as this spirit can assure only him who hath it , not another , that this is true sense of scripture , and this true sense of scripture can assure only him , not another , that this is the true spirit ( for according to their doctrine no man can be assured of anothers spirit , that it is of God , but only himselfe who hath it ; ) so doth this priuate spirit , and this scripture both assure one person , to wit , him that hath it , and that circularly , that this spirit is of God , & that this scripture is truly vnderstood by this spirit , which is most proper to that Circle , condemned by Aristotle for vnlawfull . And thus much of the first proofe . Secondly , the same absurdities which Aristotle infers vpon a circular demonstration betweene the premises and cōclusion do follow vpon this Circle betweene the scripture and the spirit . For , 1. The same thing doth proue it selfe . For if by A , I proue B , and againe by B , I proue A , then I proue A by A : or if I proue the conclusion by the premises , and the premises againe by the conclusion , then I proue the conclusion by it selfe , as Aristotle reasons . So , if I proue the spirit by the scripture , and the scripture againe by the spirit , then I proue the spirit by the spirit it selfe : for the spirit which proues that the scripture is true , by the same scripture proues that it selfe is the true spirit ; therefore the same is proued by the same . 2. The same thing is prius notum & posterius notum in respect of the same thing . For as the conclusion is knowne after the premises , as it is proued by them , and therefore the premises as it proues them ; so the spirit is knowne after the scripture as it is proued by scripture to be the spirit , and knowne also before the same scripture as it proues it to be scripture ; and so it is posterius & prius cognitum respectu eiusdem , first knowne and after knowne in respect of the same . 3. The same thing vnknowne is proued by another vnknowne . For as , when Simon Magus vnknowne to be a Prophet , is proued to be a Prophet by his Selena as vnknowne : Or when Montanus is so proued by his Maximilla : Or Manes by his Epistle , and Mahomet by his Sergius , the one vnknowne Prophet is proued by another vnknowne : So when this scripture and sense of it is knowne by a spirit as vnknowne & doubtfull , as is the scripture and sense it selfe , then one vnknowne is proued by another as vnknowne ; which is against all manner of lawfull proofe , where one ignotum vnknowne , must be proued by another notius more knowne . Whereupon follow these absurdities . 1. That the spirit doth proue it selfe . 2. That it doth proue ignotum por ignotum , that is , the vnknowne sense of scripture by the spirit vnknowne . 3. That this spirit is prius & posterius notum in respect of the same scripture . By which absurdities as Aristotle did disproue the Philosophers circular demonstration of the conclusion by the premises , and of the premises againe by the conclusion ; so we disproue the Protestants circular proofe of the spirit by the scripture , and of the scripture by the spirit . And as S. Augustine did reiect the Manichees proofe , who by Manes did proue their Fundamentall Epistle , and by their Epistle Manes : And as the Fathers reiected the Mon●anists proofe , who by Montanus proued Maximilla to be a Prophetesse , and by Maximilla Montanus to be an Apostle : So do we reiect the Protestants proofe , who by the Scripture will proue their spirit to be of God , and by the spirit the sense of scripture to be true . And as a Iudge should be partiall and vnwise who should admit the Maister to cleare the seruant , and the seruant to cleare the maister , when both are accused as guilty of the same crime ; so should we be partiall and vnwise , if we should admit their spirit to proue their sense of scripture , and their true sense of scripture to proue their spirit , when both are in the same Circle , and both vnknowne and doubtfull . By which we see that Protestants walke in a circle , and performe that which Dauid sayth , The wicked walke in a Circle . And that which S. Augustine out of the 139. Psal . sayth : VVhat is this circuit ? To go round not to stand , to go in a round of errour , where they trauell without end ; for they , who go on forward , begin in one place , and end in another ; but he who goes in a round neuer ends . This is the labour of the wicked , as is shewed in another Psalme ; The wicked walke in a round . Thus S. Augustine , and that truely ; for they haue neither beginning from which to deriue , nor end wheron to rest themselues and their groundes of doctrine , but caput circuitus , the head , the ground , and foundation of their doctrine consists in a Circle , in which they still wheele in a round , out of which they can neuer vnwind themselues , and by which they can neuer proue any thing to be true , as Aristotle sayth . And thus much of the first kind of Circle made by the Protestants betweene the spirit and the scripture : let vs proceed to the second , betweene the spirit and fayth . SVBDIV. 2. The Circle betweene the Spirit and Fayth . SECONDLY , that they commit another the like Circle betweene their spirit and fayth , is likewise proued , if first we consider and compare two of their pointes of doctrine generally receaued . The one , that they are iustified only by fayth , and that vpon it doth depend their spirit , by which they interprete scripture ; so that fayth is the root and origen of the spirit , and presupposed to it . The other , that the scripture interpreted by the spirit of God , or the spirit of God interpreting scripture is the only & whole meanes to attaine to fayth ; and so is the ground and meanes of fayth , and therefore presupposed to faith . Which supposed : aske a Protestant how , and by what meanes he assures himselfe that he hath true and certaine fayth ? He answers , by his spirit interpreting the scripture , or by the scipture interpreted by his spirit , which is all one , for so they answere : but I reply , that that cannot be , because his fayth , and the knowledge of it , as the mother and origen of his spirit which interprets scripture , is , according to the former principles , precedent and presupposed before the spirit and the knowledge of it , therefore the spirit cannot be a ground & meanes of fayth , which is precedent and presupposed as the cause of this spirit . Againe , aske him how , and by what meanes he assures himselfe that his spirit thus interpreting scripture is the true spirit of God ? He answers , by his faith : but I reply that cannot be , because the scripture interpreted by this spirit , or this spirit interpreting scripture , is , according to the latter principle , the sole and whole meanes of fayth ; therefore it cannot be knowne by fayth , sith it is the meanes of fayth , & presupposed to it . Either therefore must their principles be false , that a man is iustifyed by Fayth , which is the origen of the spirit , and that the scripture is the sole meanes of Fayth , or els if they stand to this their doctrine , this Circle and absurdity must follow , that fayth is first presupposed , and knowne before the spirit , as the cause of it , & the spirit is likewise first presupposed and knowne before faith , as the meanes to it , and so fayth is before the spirit , and the spirit before fayth ; and fayth is knowne before the spirit , and the spirit knowne before fayth . And so both fayth and spirit are prius & posterius , ech of them , both first and last knowne in respect of the other , which is to incurre the former Circle , and also the absurdities by which Aristotle confutes it . SVBDIV. 3. The Circle betweene Election , & Vnderstanding of Scripture . THIRDLY , that a third Circle is committed ( to omit a fourth betweene Election and Fayth , of which the same may be inferred as was betweene faith and the spirit ) betweene the first and last lincke of this chaine , that is , betweene Election , and the certainty of it , and the Scripture , and the vnderstanding of it , shal out of two other principles compared appeare . The first , that only the elect and predestinate are endewed with fayth , and all the reprobate excluded from it . Wherupon also followes that only the elect haue the true spirit of God and right vnderstanding of scripture , which according to them are the effects and fruit of fayth , and that election is the ground of all fayth , spirit and vnderstanding of scripture . The second , that they haue certainty by fayth of their election , and that by the word of God , which doth assure and secure them that they are predestinate ; so the word of the Lord is the meanes of their knowledge , and certainty of their election . Out of which two positions , I reason thus : Election is the ground of fayth , of the spirit , and of the vnderstanding of scripture , according to the former principle , because only the Elect haue fayth , the spirit , and true sense of Scripture ; therefore it is presupposed as knowne before fayth , the spirit , and sense of scripture , and is the ground of them all , which once supposed , the rest do necessarily follow vpon it ; and fayling , the rest must also faile with it . On the contrary , scripture , and the true vnderstanding of it , is their meanes and only meanes to know the spirit , fayth , and election , according to the latter principle , because all their fayth and assurance both of fayth and election is grounded vpon scripture , therfore true vnderstanding of scripture must be precedent and presupposed as foreknowne before the knowledge and assurance of Election , which is to be knowne only by scripture , as the only meanes to know it . Now , according to these principles , aske a Protestant , how he knowes his election ? He must , and doth answere , by scripture , which is his only meanes to secure him of his fayth and election ; therefore the true meaning of scripture must be first knowne before either spirit , fayth , or election can be knowne and assured , because it is the only meanes to know them , and the last resolution whereon to setle them . On the contrary , aske him how , he comes to know , and be certaine of his true vnderstanding of scripture ? He must returne backe againe , & doth answere , by the spirit , which assures him which is scripture and true sense of it . Aske further , how he is certaine of his hauing the true spirit ? He answers by fayth , by which he belieues , that he hath the true spirit . Aske yet lastly , how he knowes , and is certaine of his fayth ? He answers , because he is elect and chosen , and therefore must needes haue faith : Heere then is Election , which was before the thing in question , now made the last ground of resolution , vpon which all the rest , as fayth , spirit , and scripture , are to be grounded , & by which they are resolued & knowne , as before scripture was made the first meanes , and last resolution vpon which spirit , faith , and election are grounded , and by which they are knowne . Hence then appeares the Circle betweene election and scripture ; whether shal be first knowne , and be as the meanes to know the other . Shall Election ? That cannot be , because it must be knowne by fayth ; fayth by the spirit ; and the spirit by scripture ; then scripture should be first knowne . Shall scripture be first knowne ? That it cannot be , because the vnderstanding of scripture depends vpon the spirit , the spirit vpon fayth , and fayth vpon election ; therfore election must be first known . Scripture therefore must be first knowne , as the meanes to know the spirit , fayth , and election ; and election must be first knowne as the ground of all fayth , spirit , and scripture . Scripture therefore must proue election , as the meanes to know it ; and election must proue scripture , as the ground of the true vnderstanding of it : as the premisses must proue the conclusion , and the conclusion the premisses ; as Maximilla did proue Montanus , & Montanus Maximilla to be Prophets ; as Manes did proue his fundamentall Epistle to be Apostolicall , and the Epistle him to be an Apostle . Scripture therefore must be first knowne before election , and election must be first knowne before scripture , both first knowne , and both meanes to know first ech other . If both be first , which shal be last ? If both go before , which shall follow after ? Let any Protestāt by his spirit vnfold this ridle , solue the argument , & so leaue leape out of the Circle . And thus much of the third Circle , and circular manner of proceeding betweene election and scripture . SVBDIV. 4. The Circle betweene the Spirit of euery man , and a generall Councell . FOVRTHLY , one Circle more , which I obserued out of Caluin in his Commentaries vpon S. Iohn vpon these wordes Try spirits , I cannot omit , because it is notorious and important , as being betweene spirit and spirit , that is , betweene the spirit of euery priuate person , and the spirit of a generall Councell : and with it I will close vp this Chapter of circular absurdities . Caluin in the foresaid place affirmes , 1. though against himselfe , and his owne fellow Sectaries , That many false Doctours do belye , and counterfeit the title of the spirit . That , Mad men ryse vp who rashly brag that they are endewed with the spirit . That , They are fooles who amazed at the empty sound of an honourable title of the spirit , dare not inquire after the matter it selfe . That , Many boast of the spirit , yet do come in their owne priuate name , and do speake out of their owne proper sense and meaning . All which is true , but proper to the Protestants . 2. He sayth , Because of these so many false and counterfeit spirits , he enquires how we shal proue , and try these spirits ? To which he answers , that they who assigne the word of God as the meane and rule to discerne these spirits , Neque nihil , neque totum dicunt , say somewhat , but not all . For except ( sayth he ) we haue the spirit of prudence , it will little or nothing auaile to haue the VVord on our fingers end , whose interpretation or sense is not certaine to vs. Therefore according to Caluin , the scripture alone is not the complete rule or meanes to try spirits . What then ? 3. Therefore he sayth : Euery priuate man hath power and freedome to iudge of spirits , that is , euery faythfull . The faythfull therefore by their priuate spirit shall try and iudge of spirits . But heere he obiects , if so , then there will be no certainty of fayth , but all Religion will perish , because there are so many mad spirits which brag of themselues that they are the spirit of God , that , Quot , capita tot sensus , how many men so many opinions . What then must be the remedy ? 4. Therefore he admits , that the publike iudgment of the Church , and the determination of an holy Councell , is necessary to suppresse mad spirits , and to settle vnity . This is well ; for so haue Coūcells some authority : but how farre shall al men , and their priuate spirits be obliged to rely themselues , and rest their iudgment vpon this determination of the Councell ? Shall there be a pause , and rest of triall , and all spirit heere rest , and be silent ? No surely , that he will not adm●t . Wherefore 5. he addes , and concludes ( in which he ouerthrows all ) that God will not haue vs tyed to the decrees of euery Councell , though holy and pious , because ( sayth he ) it may be they did not call rightly vpon God , & it is certaine that they for the most haue erred . What then ? Heere must be an examen of the Councell , that the spirit of it may be tryed . The Councell therefore which was made iudge , must againe be iudged : but by whom ? By euery faythfull man who by his priuate spirit hath , as before , power and liberty to try all spirits , euen of Councels ; and to call ( as he sayth in another place ) in question all spirits of all Prelates , Bishops , and Councels to the rule of gods word . Loe heere his circular vaine & deluding manner of proceeding . There are many mad and bragging spirits ; it is true . These spirits must be tried : it is true . The Councell is the fittest , and surest meanes to try them ; it is true . But what ? Shall this Councell which hath power to try & iudge of these spirits , be againe tryed and iudged by euery one of these spirits , which will ( as all will ) Iudge it selfe the spirit of Prudence ? According to Caluin it must . Then which , what is more fond or friuolous ? What more circular and endlesse ? That which tryes shall by the same be tried againe . He that did iudge shall , by him whome he iudges , be iudged againe . The Councell shall try and iudge euery priuate spirit , and euery spirit shall try and iudge againe the Councell . And why ? Because forsooth , it may be doubted whether the Councell did rightly call vpon God. As though forsooth , the same may not as well , and much more , be doubted of these priuate spirits ? Among which are so many mad , foolish , and bragging spirits which need a tryall , and that by a Councell , as is graūted . Surely if this be admitted , then are tryalls endlesse , and circles will runne on forward & backward in infinitum . The Councell shall iudge the spirit , and the spirit shall iudge the Councell againe , and the Councell it againe ; and so againe and againe without end , one shall iudge and re-iudge another . If this be not a Circle , what is ? If this be not a worke endlesse and infinite , what can bee ? If this be not a meere illusion , and deluding of man , and a ground groundlesse , a question endlesse , a Circle infinite , & a proceeding vaine and senselesse , ( in which yet the Protestants proceed in their grounds of Fayth ) I will refer it to the iudgement of the indifferent reader : and so conclude that the Protestāts run in a round of Circles , prouing one thing by another , and this other by the same ; and that in the first grounds & principles of their Fayth and saluation . THE PRIVATE SPIRITS AVTHORITY To iudge of Controuersies of Fayth , confuted by Doctrinall absurdities following vpon it , against Fayth . CHAP. IX . Idolatry and Heresy compared ; and of foure heads and origens of all late heresies proceeding of the priuate Spirit . SECT . I. IN the last Chapter we haue shewed the Circular absurdities which do follow vpon this priuate Spirit , in the proofe of Protestants groundes of their Fayth and saluation . In this we are to proceed to the Doctrinall absurdityes , which follow vpon the same against all faith , piety , and reason . Wherein first we will lay downe the principall points of the Protestant fayth , and the consequences ensuing vpon it ; and afterwardes we will shew what absurdityes do follow , first in generall , out of the same heades and doctrine ; next what in particuler do follow , 1. Against the articles of the Creed , and all fayth . 2. Against the petitions of the Pater noster , and all hope and prayers . 3. Against the ten Commandements , & all morall vertue & good life . And lastly by comparing the Catholicke and Protestant doctrine togeather , we wil shew how the one doth giue all honour and glory to God , to Christ , to his Saints , his Church , his Sacraments , his law , his grace , and to man also : and that the other doth as much derogate and take away all honour , and giue all dishonour to the same . Which , that we may the better vnderstand , we may cōceaue how the Diuell ( that Rebell against God , and the enemy of man ) as he labours by all meanes to auert man frō the loue of God , and to conuert him to the loue of the creature : so his chiefe desire is to depriue God of his honour due to him , and to deriue the same to his creatures , thereby to draw man to an affectation of Deity , to rob God of his honour , and to giue it to man. Thus in paradise he perswaded our first Parents , that they should be as Gods , as himselfe had before in heauen attempted to be like to the highest . For this end this Pluto or Lucifer , of his Proserpina , that is , Infidelity his spouse , begat two daughters ; the first and eldest is Idolatry , the next and second , Heresy . Idolatry he begat in the law of Nature , which raigned long , from soone after Adam vntill some yeares after Christ . Heresy he begat in the law of Grace , which presently after Christ rebelled and sought to tyranyze against Christs Church . Idolatry insteed of one God made many , and the true honour of one God diuided to many false Gods. Heresy , insteed of one fayth , introduceth many false opinions , & diuides the vnity of Christs Church in many sects . Idolatry , was ingendred , as snakes of dunge , out of the corruption of vertue and piety , and out of the increase of lust , ambition , and cruelty . Heresy , in like manner sprung vp out of disobedience , pride , and lust , & being like ( as one egge is to another ) to Idolatry , of one Viper begat another ; of one Heresy , many , till at length a whole brood and sinke full of viperous Heresies , burst out and infected a great part of the Christian world . When therefore , by the light of iustice Christ Iesus , Idolatry the elder sister , & with her the long night of Pagan darknesse was expelled ( according to that of Apollo , Me puer Hebraeus diuos Deus ipse gubernans , cedere sede iubet tristemue redire sub arc●m ) and the true light of Christian verity & piety shined in the Church of Christ , then began the second sister Heresy , as an obscure mist , to couer the sunne of true fayth , and to bring in a new darkenes of nouell and erroneous opinions into the Church of God. And as Heresy is a kind of idolatry , both being vipers of one venter , or rather idolatry it selfe ( for so do S. Cyprian , Tertullian , Hierome , Augustine , and other Fathers expresly tearme it , because not only the authour , but the worke being all one and the same , Heresy doth frame out of mans braine a new Idoll of false opinions , and proposes them as diuine reuelations from God , whereby it either detracts from Christ and his truth , which is simple , totall , and indiuisible , some point of verity ; or els addes to the same some falsity , in the same manner as Idolatry takes from God his true deity , and honour due only to him , and giues the same to man to whom no deity or Godhead is due ) so this heresy , following the stepps of Idolatry , hath in this our late age made the same manner of beginning & progresse as Idolatry did in the first age . Wherefore it will not be amisse to obserue the manner , and to compare the progresse and fruit of both . First therefore Idolatry , the first borne of Satans imps , & the greatest enemy of God , hauing raised vpon earth a generall commotion and rebellion against the only true God and Lord of heauen and earth , and wrought in man a conceit of deity and an affectation of the diuine excellency , thereby to depriue God of his only and all due honour , and to deriue the same vnto man his creature and vassall , did first feine in the mindes of men an imagination , that before the world was made , all was a Chaos ; that this Chaos made to it selfe finem & fundum , a depth & a bottome , like an egge , which being sitten and hatched , brought forth a man-woman called Planeta ; this man woman broughr forth substance , motion , and generation ; of these was begot Caelum and Terra , Heauen and Earth . Heauen begat six men called Titans , that is , Oceanus , Ceus , Tyus , Hyperion , Iapetus , and Cronus who was Saturne . The earth begat six women , Thya , Rhea , Themis , Mnemosyna , Thetis , and Hebe , which marrying one to another , of Saturne and Rhea were borne Pluto , Neptune , and Iupiter . Saturne receauing from some Oracle , that he should be expulsed by his sonnes , deuoured Pluto and Neptune , & intended to haue done the like to all his male children , but Rhea to saue Iupiter , gaue a stone insteed of the child , to be eaten by Saturne , which stone being deuoured thrust out of Saturns belly Pluto & Neptune , the one into Hell , the other into the Sea , wherby they were made Gods , Pluto of Hell , and Neptune of the Sea , and Iupiter being sent by Rhea his mother to Heauen , was made the God of heauen . Thus were Saturne and Rhea made parents of Gods , and Iupiter the chiefe God ; this Iupiter was notorious , first for cruelty , for he not only killed his Vncles the Titans , and deuoured his daughter Medea , and tormented his sonnes Tantalus and Titius , but also butchered and tormented his owne Father Saturne ; secondly , for lust , he passed so farre , that by incest of his owne sisters Iuno and Ceres , he begot of Iuno , Vulcan the God of Smithes , and of Ceres , Proserpina the Queene of Hell , as likewise out of his owne braine he begat Minerua , and out of his thigh Bacchus . Also by adultery of other mens wiues , he begat Mercury of Maie the wife of Atlant , Apollo , and Diana of Latona the wife of Cea ; the graces Thalia , Euphrosine , and Aglia of Hermion the wife of Cleanus ; Eudimion of Phenissa the wife of Alphion ; Musaeus of Helena the wife of Pandion , with many others . Not thus content he transformed himselfe into diuers shapes , as of an husband , and begat of Alcmena , Hercules ; and of Cassiopeia , Andromedes ; of a Sheepheard , and begat of Mnemosyna the nine Muses ; of a Satyre , and begat of Anthiope , Amphion & Zetas ; of an Eagle , and begat of Egina , Eacus ; of a Vulture , and begat of a Nymphe the Palisci in Sicily ; of a Swanne , & begat of Hellen , Leda , and of a Goose , Nemesis ; like a Bull , he begat of Europa Minous , Rhadamantus & Sarpedon ; like a Beare , he begat of Mantea Arctos ; and like a pismire Mirmedon of Euradremusa ; being also transformed and shewing himselfe as a starre he begat Castor and Pollux of Leda ; as Gold , Perseus of Danae ; as a Shower of raine , Ganean of Manta . Thus a man as wicked as great , was made the greatest God , & his chiefe actions of wickednes , cruelty , parricide , incest , adultery & fraud , were deifyed for diuine . And as the God Iupiter , so also the other Gods begat younge Gods , and made them like themselues Gods ; thus Neptune of a Sea-nimph begat Tritō , of Amphitrite the Cyclopes , Brontes , Sterape , & Pyracmon . Thus Venus had by Vulcane , Cupid ; by Bacchus , Priapis . Thus Mars begat Cygnus , Apollo , Phaeton &c. And so the Gods begat so thicke and so fast young Gods , that the number of the Gods increased , according to Varro to the number of thirty thousand , according to others , to many more , yea to an infinite number . For when thus Idolatry had once taken roote in mēs imaginatiō , it grew vp to that height that it made Gods some greater , some lesser , some of men , some of women ; as of the greater Gods of men , Mercury , Mars , Neptune , Saturne , Ioue , Vulcan , Apollo . Of women , Iuno , Vesta , Venus , Ceres , Minerua , Diana : as of the lesser Gods , Bacchus , Eolus , Hercules , were men-gods ; & Thetis , Aurora , Bellona women goddesses . And it made Gods and adored with diuine honour , not only good men , but bad also , and them for their bad actions , as Iupiter for his former vices , Saturne for parricide , Mars for cruelty , Mercury for fraud , Venus for lust , Iuno for enuy , and dedicated to them , in signe of diuine honour , certaine Creatures , as to Iupiter a Goat , to Diana a Hart , to Ammon a Ramme , to Ceres Corne , to Bacchus Wine , to Vulcane Fire , to Osiris Water , and to others a fish &c. from which creatures in honour to them , they did either alwayes , or at certaine tymes abstaine . Likewise they honoured their sepulchers , as the monuments of Gods , as the Syrians did that of Adonis , the Aegyptians that of Osyris ▪ the Troians of Hector , the Lenconissi of Achilles , the people of Pontus that of Patroclus , and the people of Rodes that of Alexander the Great . Thus did Idolatry deify bad men and women , and for their bad actions make them Gods , and giue them diuine honour : thus it made Gods some common for all , some speciall for particular actions , and occasions . Of the speciall Gods it made Esculapius a God of the sicke , Februa a goddesse for agues , Pauor a God for courage , Bacchus for drunkenes , Siluanus against dangers in sports , Meretrix for harlots , Fessoria for trauellers , Fortuna for good lucke , Simula for good memory , Quies for rest , Murcia for fatnes , Genouia against slouth , Thetrica for actions and comedies , Esculanus for gold & siluer , Pecunia for mettals , Iugatinus against thunder , Tutellina against haile , Flora against frost , Rubigo against wormes and locusts , Agrestis for the fields , Pelonius against the enimies of the earth , Spinenis against weeds in corne , Segetius for sowing corne , Matura for ripening corne , Ruana for reaping corne , Belus for warre , Victoria for victory , Honorius for Inne-keepers , Lamentina for dore-hammers , Cadrea for dore barres and hinges , Cloatina for the priuies . And which is most to be admired , this Idolatry so far deluded the wise & valiant Romans , that it perswaded them to build temples & offer sacrifice to these Gods and goddesses for any commodity or necessity , as to Volumnus & Volumna for espoused persons , to Cantius for wise children , to Lucina for safe child-bearing , to Opis for the child new borne , to Vaginatus to keepe it from crying , to Ganinus for safety of it in the cradle , to Runinus for good sucking and nursing , to Stellius to preserue it from lamenesse , to Adeon that it might loue the mother , to Mentalis that it might be witty and studious , and to Berecinthea the mother of all these Gods. And one of the Romans a Philosopher most famous in Camillus time among thē for his piety & temperance ( for it is said of him that for sixty yeares ( he liued 113. ) he neuer went out of the walles of Rome , neuer was heard speake idle word , neuer spent idle hower , neuer had contention with any , neuer was noted of any publicke crime ) by name Bruxellus did so increase and multiply the number of the Gods in the citty of Rome , that whereas he found only fiue Gods receaued ●mong them , that is , Iupiter , Mars , Ianus , Berecinthea , & Vesta , he left among them 2800. as many as there were families . Thus did Gods multiply and increase among that warlike people , euery family hauing a speciall God , and many still new Gods vpon any new occasion . Neither did this Idolatry thus rest , but proceeded on further , first to deify and make Gods of the passions of men , as of Ira , Fuga , and Voluptas , which they adored ; next to giue diuine honour to beasts , yea and to sensles creatures : thus did whole nations worship for Gods the Philistines Dagon a fish , the Egiptians Apis an oxe , the Babilonians a dragon and golden statua , the Israelites a golden calfe and a brasen serpent , the Persians the Sunne , the Acacians the Moone , to which they offered sacrifice in like manner , as the Romans did to Iupiter , the Grecians to Iuno , the Africans to Mars , the Macedonians to Mercury , the Corinthians to Apollo , the Armenians to Bacchus , the Ephesians to Diana . Quis furor est , quae tanta animas daementia cepit , Vt volucrem , turpemue bouem , toruumue Draconem , Semi-hominemue Canem , supplex homo pronus adoret ? sayth Sedulius . Thus did others for want of greater , adore as Gods , some ( as the Chaldeans ) the planets of Saturne , Iupiter , Mars Sol , Venus and Mercury ; others ( as the Grecians ) Oceanus of the sea , Stix & Acaron of riuers : others ( as the Egyptians ) Eolus of the winds , Herbes in the garden , as of Leekes , Garlike and Onions , yea saith one , the basest wind , Crepitus ventris . Felices gentes quibus hac nascuntur in hortis . Numina . — saith Iuuenall of the Egiptians . Of diuers of which in holy scripture mention is made , as of (a) Asteroth the goddesse of the Sidonians , of (b) Baal the God of the Samaritans , of (c) Belphegor the God of the Moubites , of (d) Beelzebub of Acaron , of (e) Chamos the God of the Moabites , (f) Rhemnon of the Syrians , of (g) Norgal of the Cutheans , (h) Micha in mount Ephraim , (i) Priapus the God of Maaca the Mother of Asa , (k) Hercules the God of the Tirians , (l) Adonis of the Israelites which many others . In al which this Idolatry , as we see , ouerflowed so farre the bankes of all reason and religion , that hauing once made a breach , and robbed God of his honour , it bestowed the same vpon the vilest & meanest sort of creatures , and that so vnreasonably and senslesly that it is a wonder , how men of reason could be so void of reason as to beleeue , professe and follow it . This was the proceeding of Idolatry . Heresy in like manner , as the second impe of Sathan which succeeded Idolatry , and was raysed of her ashes and corruption , that it might the better sow the seed of infidelity , and roote it selfe stronger in worldly and carnall affections , did in imitation of her elder sister Idolatry , seeke to rob Christ Iesus of the verity of his diuine reuelations , and his spouse the Church of the sincerity of true fayth and Religion , and transferred the same vnto erroneous and hereticall falsities . For which it inuented and framed in mens conceits an opinion of a priuate spirit which it made the mother and deuiser of all errours and heresies ; of which as in the primitiue ages of Christs Church it begat in the braine of Manes , Marcion , Sabellius , Arius , Macedonius , Nestorius , Eutiches and others the wicked errours against the B. Trinity , of one God & three Persons in the Deity , against the sacred Incarnatiō of one person , and two natures in the person of our B. Sauiour Christ , by which , as by so many bastardes of impiety , such an infinit brood of heresyes haue since that tyme beene ingēdred in the Christian world , that the increase of thē hath filled , or rather defiled a great part of the East Church both in Asia & Africke , and left behind them the stincke of no fewer then 300. rotten heresies , and hereticall opinions : So also in this last age of Christ it begat in the braines of an Apostata Frier Martin Luther , which it coupled with a like Apostata Nunne , and of other Apostataes , Bucer , Martyr , Bale , Knox &c. whome it wi●ed in like incestuous bed of double Apostacy , and of all sort of impurity , such a number of brats or rather vipers of hereticall opinions , and errours , as neither the number of them can be recounted ( of which some haue found out 300. and more ) nor can the mischiefe of dissention and cruelty be conceaued , with which they haue pestered the most florishing Kingdomes of Europe , and brought in an horrible confusion and desolation in place of former piety and religion . In which we may obserue , that as Idolatry made Chaos , or confusion the mother of all ; so hath Heresy made the priuate spirit ( which is nothing but a Chaos , or confused conceit which euery one hath of his owne opinion ) the mother and conceauer of all hereticall opinions . As Idolatry diuised that out of Planeta the Man-woman , or fruit of Chaos , issued Heauē and Earth , and of them so many Gods & Goddesses ; so hath Heresy caused , that out of the commixtion of a Friars and Nuns concupiscence , such a number of hereticall opinions , and wicked practises should receaue their origen and progresse . As the Pagans made Iupiter , a man of life most wicked and exercised in all practise of cruelty , and incestuous carnality , a God , and the chiefest among the Gods ; so do the Protestants canonize Luther , a man of a most carnall , proud and enuious both disposition & course of life , as an Apostle , an Euangelist , a Prophet , and a man of God. As Saturne the false God by Idolatry was made the Father of many Gods , chiefly of three , Iupiter , Neptune , and Pluto , who also begat many petty Gods , and filled the world with many innumerable false Gods , whereby adoration was giuen euen first to men , then to the basest and meanest creatures : so Luther the false Apostle and Prophet , by the instigation of his priuate spirit , did beget and deuise foure most monstruous imps of hereticall doctrine and impiety , out of which as so many vipers , such a number of erroneous and wicked opinions haue flowed , that the light of true fayth and Religion hath beene obscured , and the beauty and splendor thereof hath beene attributed to most false errours & fond heresyes . And thus hath Heresy succeeded and imitated her elder sister Idolatry . Now these foure heades or principall heresies , which the priuate spirit , the eldest daughter of Heresy , did beget in Luther , and his followers braines , and out of which as sequels issued such a number of falsities and heresies , are these . The first is , that the Church and Bishop of Rome is fallen from being the spouse of Christ , to be the very Antichrist himselfe , as wholy opposite to Christ , and corrupted with all abominable errours of idolatry and superstition , out of which haue issued these and such like brats of heresy , that therefore the visible and knowne Church was latent , inuisible and not extant for many ages , and that true fayth and doctrine was banished from the same visible Church , which was only the Roman Church , and that for many ages , some of them say six , some ten , some twelue , some fourteen ages , euen since the Apostles tyme , all which tyme , truth lay smothered , ouerwhelmed and buried in the dregges of Antichristian errour , superstition , and idolatry . That all the Councels Prouinciall or Generall , were the assemblies of Antichrist . All the Fathers , and Doctours were deceaued and subiected to Antichrist . All the Christian people , Princes , or Prelates , liued in the externall obedience of Antichrist . That no lawfull mission or vocation , no right ordination or consecration , no continuall succession or deriuation of Pastours was for all this tyme to be found in the Church . That no preaching of the word of God , no administration of Sacraments , no offering of sacrifice , no saying of seruice , no discipline of Church orders and gouernment , was holy and lawfull for so many ages , till God extraordinarily raysed vp Martin Luther , and by his spirit reformed all . Whereupon , since that tyme hath ensued , as the fruits of the wombe of this priuate spirit , and new doctrine , all neglect and contempt of Church orders , lawes , or obseruances , as of Masse , and Mattins , of fasting , and festiuall dayes , of single life and chastity , of obedience , and pouerty , of pennance , and mortification , of confession , and satisfaction , of benedictions , and peregrinations , and of all Workes of austerity , piety , and deuotion . Hence hath ensued all rapine , & robing of Churches , Church-goods , and Church-ornaments , all destruction of Monasteries , and Religious houses , all prophanation of holy thinges , all cruelty against Priests , & Religious men , all incestuous and sacrilegious lewdnesse against vowed persons , all rebellion against Princes for Religion , all contempt of them , and their lawes as not obliging in conscience , and all liberty of life and manners , to practise whatsoeuer profit , or pleasure proposed as most plausible to euery mans humour , and disposition . The second and next ofspring of this spirit was Iustification by only fayth in which as they all agree in generall ; so it hath beene the mother of many notorious new impietyes , from whence , as out of a Troian-horse , issued these and such like prophane paradoxes ; as that this fayth is a sole fayth , not informed with charity or good workes , (a) a speciall fayth , assuring certainty of saluation , a perpetuall faith neuer lost , a rare fayth giuen only to the Elect , a fayth couering , not curing sinnes , imputing , not making vs iust , apprehending , not possessing the iustice of Christ . A faith that admits no good workes , no merit , no profit , no necessity , yea no possibility either of being iustifyed by any , or of hauing power to do any good workes at all ; because all works , euen the best workes of the best men , are sinnes , and that mortall , deseruing eternall damnation , though by fayth not imputed to the elect . Hence it is , that the keeping of the law is impossible , that no lawes oblige in conscience , that grace is not sufficient , that man hath no free-will , and cannot but sinne and offend , that Sacraments are not instrumēts and meanes , but seales and signes of this iustice , and iustification by fayth ; that Baptisme is to be giuē only to the faithfull , and children of the faythful , that the Eucharist is a signe or figure of Christs body , receaued only by the faythfull , & Elect. With many such like , which hang vpon the former principle . The third , and next borne impe of this spirit , is the doctrine of Originall sinne , which against the Pelagians , Luther admitting , did yet , against the Catholike Church , maintaine to be naturall Concupiscence , which in the state of corrupt nature remaining in man , is very Originall sinne it selfe . This Originall sinne , say they , doth corrupt and infect the whole man , and all , and euery action in man proceeding from it with sinne , doth cause that a man in all , euen in his best actions doth sinne , and can do nothing but sinne ; and so can neither merit by any good worke , nor satisfy for any sinne , doth hinder all internall grace , and iustification , which should abolish sinne , & doth take away all ability of free-will , all possibility of keeping the Commandements , or so much as any one of them ; all obligation to performe any precept of the loue of God , or man , morall or diuine ; and so all endeauour and labour to do pennance , to seeke perfection , to take vp the crosse of Christ , and mortify our passions , and follow him , as being needlesse , fruitlesse , and impossible by the infection of this concupiscence , which they make to be originall sinne . The last and youngest bastard-brood of this spirit , is the doctrine of predestination , of which though Luther layd the egge ; yet because Caluin did hatch the brood , & maintaine aboue any other before him , it is imputed to him as the first hatcher of it , and as his bastard , is by many Lutherans and Arminians reiected . The doctrine of which is this , that God out of his absolute and irrespectiue will , as he predestinated , ordained , and created some to saluation , so by the same will he like wise predestinated , ordained , and created others to damnation ; the one because it was his will that they should be saued ; the other meerely because it was his will ( without any fault , sinne , or demerit in them foreseene ) that they should be damned . To which damnation that he might bring them , he did for that end create them , and ordained that first Adam , then all his posterity should sinne , that for this sinne he might execute his sentence of damnation ; for which end he did cause Sathan to tempt them to sinne , to moue and force them to sinne , yea did himselfe take from them all liberty not to sinne , and worke in them immediatly by his operation all their sinne , and obdurate them in that sinne ; and for that end that they should haue no remedy or help against sinne , he denyed them the benefit of the death of Christ , and his merits , the benefit of vocation to grace , of sufficiency of grace , of iustification by grace , or of glorification by the meanes of grace , to all those whome he had thus appointed to damnation , and to sinne . On the contrary , to them whome he had ordained to be saued , he ordayned likewise the death & Passion of Christ as a meane for that end to them only , and by it gaue effectuall vocation , sanctification , and glorification to them only , and of these only ( who are his only children ) he maks his Church . To these only , let them do what they will , he imputes no sinne , but couers all their sinnes with the cloake of the iustice of Christ , accounts them iust , and notwithstanding all their sinnes , loues them as his children , esteemes them as his darlinges , and enthrones them as heires in his Kingdome of heauen , among his Saints and Angels . All which and such like opinions in number infinit , and in impiety horrible , as so many swarmes of locusts and gnates , engendred out of the corruption of all good christianity , and conceaued in the wombe of double Apostacy , and sacriledge between a Frier and a Nunne , by the heat and smoke of this fiery spirit of frensy , haue as so many clouds shaddowed the light of true Fayth , as so many Foxes deuoured the Lambes of Christs sheepfould , as so many rootes of ill weedes ouergrowne and choaked the haruest of Christs fields , and as so many vipers poysoned the soules of an infinit number of Christians : Whereby is left nothing , but ruine and vastation of all ancient monuments of piety , nothing but horrour , and confusion in all discipline , and orders of Religion , nothing but impiety and desolation of all Fayth and beliefe in many flourishing kingdomes of Christianity . Of which as any one in former ages would haue sufficed , as a plague , to haue infected any Country with heresy ; so al of them compiled in one bundell , can bring no lesse then a general mortality of all goodnes in so many Countrys infected by thē . Of absurdities which follow vpon the first head , of contempt of all Church-authority , and relying vpon the priuate spirit . SECT . II. BVT let vs proceed and consider in particuler what fruits and consequences , and what absurdities , contrary to all reason , honesty , and piety do flow , and follow out of these principles & positions . And first to begin with their first principle , and the issue following from it , which is their contempt of Church-authority , their condemning the Roman Church , as Antichristian , and theit bold affirming the true Church of Christ , for so many ages , to haue decayed , & perished , and to haue beene inuisible not knowne , & wholy ouerwhelmed with errours of superstition , idolatry , & Antichristianity , 1. It followes that for so many ages , that is , 8.10.12 . or 14. as before , was neither true Church or congregation , neither lawfull Pastours and Preachers , neither right Sacramēts or Sacrifice , neither any diuine seruice or worship of God among any visible company of people in any part of the Christian world . 2. It followes , that in all those ages , all the Fathers and Doctours , all the Bishops & Prelates , all the Confessours , Virgins , and Martyrs , and all the Councels generall or prouinciall : that all the foure Doctours of the Latin Church , and the rest with them , al the Doctours of the East Church , & all the learned among thē , all ancient Bishops of the Primitiue church , & al the Cleargy vnder them , all the foure first generall Councels , and the other twelue after them , with the prouinciall Councels confirmed by them , & the Bishops , and Confessours in them ; that all the Holy Virgins , Confessours and Martyrs in tyme of most of the ten persecutions , and of the Arian , and image-breaking Emperours ; that all the Emperours of Rome , Constantinople , or Germany , of the East or West , all the Kinges of Italy , Spaine , France , England , Scotland , Swethland , Denmarke , or Poland , all and euery one , who before Luther were Christians , and professed the christian Religion ; that all these with the people , who professed the same Christianity with them , & vnder them , were all seduced by a false fayth , and false Christianity , and all liued and dyed in the seruice , not of Christ , but Antichrist . Into what heart of any Christian can it enter , that for so many ages , no Doctour with his penne , no Prelate out of the pulpit , no Cōfessour in prison , no Martyr at his death , no Councell by their decrees , no Emperour with his sword , no people , or Pastour in any parish should haue publikly professed ▪ maintayned , and confirmed the true fayth of Christ , and true doctrine of saluation , but all of Antichrist and damnation . Thirdly , it follows that all the predictions , and prophecies of the prophets before Christ , all the promises and assurances made by Christ himselfe , or by his Apostles to his Church , either of the extension , and amplitude of Christes Church from sea to sea , from North to South , to the vttermost end of the world , to all people and nations , to all Iles and Kingdomes , to all Kinges and Princes , or of continuance & succession of the same as long as the Sunne & Moon shall endure , from Sabaoth to Sabaoth , from age to age , frō generation to generation without interruption , or discontinuance from that tyme till the worlds end ; or of the Holy Ghosts assistance , and continuance with it , as the Pillar , and ground of truth against all the waues and stormes of the sea of this world , against all the swordes and violence of persecutors and Tyrants , and against all principalities and powers the gouernours of this darknesse , and the very gates of hell it selfe : It followes , I say , that all these predictions haue beene false , and not verifyed , as Castalion , and Dauid George both Protestants , conuinced by experience of the not being of a Protestant Church , haue confessed ; it followes that the Prophets of the old Testament who foretould them , were false , not true Prophets , that the Apostles of the new Testament who confirmed them , were vnlawfull and faythlesse messengers , and that Iesus Christ who planted , watered , & promised to giue increase to this his Church , was not the only true omnipotent God , but either a false deceauer , who promised that he knew should not be performed , or els a weake worker , who could not performe that which he had promised , to wit , this amplitude , succession , and firmity of his Church , thus wholy frustrated and made void , according to the former principle and doctrine . All which is wikedly confessed vpon the former groundes by Dauid George , Ochinus , and others . Fourthly it followes , that Turkes , Iewes , and Gentils haue had a more flourishing state of a Church , Kingdome , and Professours , as hauing beene more visible , potent , and dilated , for many continued ages , in many distant partes of the world , then the christians , who haue had neither Prince , Prelate , people , or scarce any publike Professours of true Christianity , for one age together , vnder any one King , in any one prouince of the world . That Mahomet , and Antichrist or the diuel by them , did with more prudence , and power with more piety , and policy , establish , enlarge , & protect their faith and common wealth which so long continued , then Iesus Christ , who is true God and man , did , or could do his faith and Church , which so soone after his departure erred , failed , and decayed . Where is the greater glory of the second temple , (a) then of the first ? Where is the (b) ends of the earth giuen to it for a possession ? Where are the (c) Kings and Queenes who as nursing fathers , are to haue protected it ? Where are the people and nations , who with the (d) gold of Arabia and Saba were to haue inriched it ? Where are the Iles , and kingdomes who from the vttermost (e) ends of the world were to haue waited vpon this Church of Christ , more then any other of Iews , Turks , or Pagans ? What , was Christ lesse true , lesse good , lesse faythfull , lesse able and potent , in the establishing , and preseruing his kindgome , then were Moyses , or Mahomet , Cyrus , or Romulus in setling and enlarging their Synagogue , Sect , or Common-wealth ? Surely it followes ( O horrour and blasphemy ) if these positions , and points of the Protestants priuate spirits doctrine , were true and warrantable . Of absurdities which follow vpon the second head of sole Fayth . SECT . III. SECONDLY , Out of the second principle , and doctrine depending on it ( which is that a man is iustified by only faith , which is a faith , speciall of euery one 's owne predestination , iustification , and glorification ; so certaine , and so sure as that there is a God , or that Christ is saued ; so perpetuall , that it can neuer be lost , and peculiar only to the elect , depending vpon their priuat spirit , and the rest before mentioned ) it followes , First . That a man is not only without all doubt , or so much as any feare , certaine of his predestination past , iustification present , and glorification to come , but also that he is more certaine of it then he is of the B. Trinity , of the Incarnation , Passion , Resurrection , ascension , and coming of Christ ; which he belieues only by a faith not supernaturall , and diuine , but historicall , generall , and common , as they say , to the reprobate and diuels ; yea more certaine , then Iesus-Christ was of his saluation , whom they affirme to haue feared , doubted , distrusted , and despaired , before his death of his saluation , as is afterward shewed . Yea as certaine must they be , as certaine they are that God is one God , or that Iesus Christ is in heauen or , as if Iesus Christ were present , and so told them ; which are their owne words , and comparisons , which is both absurd and impious : absurd , because they haue scripture to auouch the being of one God , and the saluation of Christ ; but which auouches to euery mā this his saluatiō in particular they haue neither scripture nor reason : Impious , because what greater impiety , and blasphemy can be conceaued , then to make Christ , God and man , doubtfull of his saluation , and themselues , sinfull and wicked wretches , certaine of theirs ? Secondly it followes , that euery Protestant may , and must by faith belieue as certaine , that , of which neither authority of scripture , testimony of Church , or euidence of reason doth yield any argument of certainty ; but only his owne priuate spirit and conceit doth suggest , and perswade this certainty of euery one his owne iustification and saluation ; and yet that the same Protestants may doubt , yea refuse to assent and belieue such articles of faith , as both expresse authority of Scripture , euident proposition of Church and confessed testimony of auncient tradition , Fathers , and Councels doth fully and frequently deliuer and approue : such are many articles now in controuersy , as Freewill , merit , good works , reall presence , prayer to saints , for the dead , and such like . All which , for example , Caluin and euery Protestant do as firmly ( notwithstanding all the former confessed testimonies ) reiect and condemne , as they belieue the certainty of their owne saluation , which ( notwithstanding that it be not mentioned or motioned in particular , in any such , or the former testimonyes ) they do most vndoubtedly and firmely apprehend and belieue . In which among all absurdities what can be more absurd then without any other reason or testimony , but ones owne conceit , so firmely to adhere to a thing of importance , so vncertaine both in it selfe , and in experience ; and yet not belieue many thinges in themselues so probable , and so mainly by so many testimonies confirmed and approued ? Which what is it els , but to belieue what euery one will , and best likes , & to reiect what he will not belieue , or doth dislike him ; and so to make euery one 's owne will , conceit , or affection the rule of his fayth and beliefe . Thirdly , it followes , that euery Protestant is not only as sure of his own saluation , as he is of Christs , & that he cānot be damned except Christ be damned , which (a) Luther , (b) Caluin , & (c) Zuinglius expresly , though absurdly , hold : but also that he is as iust & holy , as any Confessour , Martyr , Apostle , or the Mother of God , yea euen as Iesus Christ himself . For sith all are iust , according to them , not by any iustice internall and inherent in the soule ; but externall and imputed by Fayth ( which fayth , apprehending the iustice of Christ which was in him , makes it the iustice of euery one in particuler , for which he is accounted iust ) it followes that this iustice of Christ which is equally imputed to all the iust , doth equally couer all sins , maks equally iust all persons , yea all as iust as Iesus Christ , whose iustice is theirs , and with whose iustice they are equally couered , and thereby counted equally iust before God. Whence ensues , that all are as iust at the first instance of their iustification , as Christ was both at first and euer till his ascension , and that they cannot increase in iustice , & be made more iust , and iustified still ; because from the first instant of their iustification they haue all the iustice imputed to them , which Christ had euer inherent till his ascension in him , & are as iust at the first as he euer was at first or last . Which , though absurd , senselesse , and impious , yet it hath not wanted expresse defenders among them , as Luther who affirmed all faythfull to be as iust as Peter , Paul , our B. Lady , and all Saints . As (a) Bucer , who affirmed euery minister to be as iust as was S. Iohn Baptist , then whome was not by the testimony of our Sauiour (b) a greater among the borne of women . And (c) Zuinglius , who affirmes that God fauours no lesse euery faythfull Christian then he doth Christ himselfe , and that euery one hath as great right to heauen , as Christ hath . Fourthly it followes , that not only all faythfull Christians , but that all people , whether good or bad , Iewes o● Gentils , Christians or Pagans , yea all who euer haue liued or euer shall liue in this world , shal be all saued as sure as Christ is saued . This is deduced out of the Protestant doctrine , two wayes ; first out of diuers their positions , which by many of them , chiefly by (d) Caluin , are belieued , and taught , as 1. That only fayth doth iustify , and that it being once had cannot be lost . 2. That this fayth is promised to all faythfull and their seed , as it was to Abraham and his seed , & that therefore all the children of the faythfull are sanctifyed in their Mothers wombe , as being within the Couenant made to their Parents and their seed , as Caluin stifly maintaines . 3. That the Sacraments , and chiefly Baptisme , are seales or signes of fayth , and so are to be ministred only to the faithfull , and the children of the faythfull ; for which Farellus at Geneua refused to baptize a child , whose parents were Papists , and Caluin approued the fact . 4. That therfore the children of the faythfull shal be saued , though they neuer be baptized , as the English Catechisme teachs , because they are borne of faithfull Parents , & so are in the couenāt , and sanctifyed before they be borne . If al this should be true , it would follow that , because the couenant and promise of fayth and saluation was made , for example , to Abraham and his seed , & that because Abraham had fayth , was sealed with the signe of fayth , was iust by Fayth , must continue in fayth , and was saued by fayth , that therefore his seed Ismael , and Isaac ; and as Isaac , so his seed Iacob and Esau ; and as Iacob , so all his seed , all the twelue Patriarches his sonnes , were likewise included in the couenant , were all borne of faythfull parents , all sanctifyed in their Mothers wombe , all sealed as faythfull with the Circumcision , the signe of faith , all made iust by fayth , all continued in the same fayth , and so all saued in heauen by vertue of that fayth . And as they , so their seed , and children , and their childrens children , from generation to generation must be likewise included in the Couenant ; be likewise sanctifyed in their Mothers wombe , be likewise sealed with the signe of the Couenant , or Circumcision ; be likewise iust by fayth , continue iust in fayth , and be likewise saued by fayth . And the same which it inferred of Iacob , and his children , and childrens children vnto the worldes end , may also be inferred and auouched truly either more generally of Adam , and all his posterity , or more particulerly of any one faythfull , and his posterity for euer . For if Adam and Eue , or this particular faythfull person were faythfull , iust , and saued , then their children after them , and their childrens children for euer were likewise faythfull , iust and saued , because as the Parents had the promise of fayth made to themselues , and their children ; so their children were borne sanctifyed of these faythfull parents , were sealed with the signe of fayth , Circumcision or Baptisme ; were made iust , continued iust by fayth , & were saued as iust by fayth ; and as these children , so also all their children and childrens children by the same reason were all included in the couenant or promise of Fayth , were al born sanctifyed by fayth , were all to be sealed with the signe of fayth , were all made iust by fayth , all cōtinued iust by fayth , & so are all saued by fayth ; and so all the posterity of Adam , Nati natorum , & quotquot nascentur abillis , as they were included in the promise of fayth made to their parents and them , and therby were all faithfull , and continued and ended all faythfull , so were they all saued . By which it should follow also not only , that all the whole world should be saued and none damned ; but also that fayth , iustification and saluation should descend by inheritance from generation to generatiō as Landes should by entayle , which cannot by any fine or recouery be cut off , sold , or lost . And as they are all thus faythfull , & iust by fayth apprehending the iustice of Christ , and had the iustice of Christ equally imputed to them for their iustice : so are they all equally iust , as iustifyed by the same iustice of Christ , and all equally iust with Christ , as hauing the same iustice theirs which was Christs ; and so are all iust and perfect as any Saint , or Christ , are all as certaine of saluation as any Saint , or Christ , and shal be all as blessed in heauen as is any Saint or Christ , with whome as they had the same iustice in earth , so for the same they shall haue the like glory in heauen . Which absurdity as of all absurdities it is most absurd , so doth it follow out of the same absurd doctrine . Secondly , the same absurdity is inferred out of another of the Protestants vsually receaued position of doctrine , which is , That euery man shall be saued by only Fayth , and that by a speciall Fayth , by which he is bound infallibly to ▪ belieue that he shal be saued if he wil be saued : out of which their receaued doctrine I reason thus . Whatsoeuer euery man in particuler is bound to belieue as an article of Fayth necessary to his saluation , that is true & certaine , whether he do belieue it or no. But euery man in particular is bound to belieue as an article of his faith necessary to his saluation , according to the Protestants , that he shal be saued . Ergo , That euery man in particuler shal be saued , is true & certaine , according to the Protestants doctrine , whether he belieue it , or no. The Maior proposition is true , and not deniable in any diuinity , because all articles or points of Fayth , which all are bound to belieue as necessary to saluation , and vnder paine of damnation , are most certainly true , & aeternae veritatis antecedenter , and before they be actually belieued , whether they be belieued or not by them , who ought to belieue them . For so , that there is a blessed Trinity of three persons & one God , an Incarnation of the Sonne of God , a Resurrection of the body and the like , is certainely true in it selfe , though the Arians , Nestorians , and other Heretikes doe not belieue it , which yet they are bound to belieue as necessary to saluation . Therefore if euery man be bound in like manner to belieue his owne saluation as certainly , and as neccessarily as he is bound to belieue the B. Trinity , Incarnation , & Resurrection , & that as an article of his fayth ; it followeth that his saluation is as certainly true as his Resurrection whether soeuer he do belieue , or not belieue either , or both of them ; and so it is inferred that he shal be saued , as well as ryse againe , though he do not belieue it : which is confirmed , because the obiect of Fayth , or thing to be belieued hath in it eternall verity , before the act of mans Fayth doe conceaue or belieue it , and therefore is belieued because it is and before was true , but is not made true because it is now belieued ; fayth not making , but supposing his obiect , which as it houlds true in the verity of the Resurrection , Incarnatiō , Trinity and others point of fayth which are belieued , because they are true , & are true whether they be belieued or not ; so it must hould true in the verity of euery mans saluation if it be a point of euery mans fayth . For if the certainty of his owne saluation be the obiect of euery mans fayth which he ought to belieue , then the same certainty or obiect is true before it be belieued ; and so it is true that he shal be saued before he do belieue , and true it is whether he so belieue or no. The Minor Proposition or subsumption that according to the Protestants , euery mā is to belieue his owne Iustificatiō and Saluation , is so certaine that it is their common receaued doctrine , that Only Fayth doth iustify , that this Only Fayth is a Speciall Faith , that this Speciall Fayth hath for his only obiect which it belieues , remission of his sins , his Iustificatiō & saluation by Christ , that this beliefe is a diuine fayth , a sauing fayth , as certaine a fayth , as that by which we belieue that there is a God , a Iesus Christ , a heauen or hel , so certaine that it admits no doubt or vncertainty , but includes an infallible & assured confidence of the promises of God to vs of our saluation . Thus sayth Caluin (a) that Iustifying Faith is a certaine knowledge of Gods fauour to vs ; that (b) euery one must vndoubtedly be sure that God is mercifull vnto him . Beza , (c) that Fayth is not to belieue in God , or in the word of God , which Fayth the Diuells haue ; (d) but a firme perswasion of our election in Christ : A (e) certainty by which we are more certaine then of any thing , that life euerlasting is due to vs. Luther , (f) that Fayth is a constant & firme perswasion without doubt or wauering of Gods grace & good will due to vs ; (g) so certaine , that it is aboue all other certainty . Bucer , (h) that Fayth is nothing but a certaine perswasion of our saluation of Christ . The (i) Confession of Auspurge , of Saxony , Luther , Lobecius , Pareus , Whitaker , Reynoldes , Perkins , That a man is iustifyed by belieuing , and that without wauering or feare of his owne infirmity , that his sinnes ere forgiuen , that he is iust , and shal be saued . Yea ( sayth Iewell ) he must be so certaine , as if Christ was present and so told him ; sayth Pareus , as certaine as that Christ dyed for the remission of our sinnes ; sayth Luther , and Zuinglius , as certaine as he is of Christs saluatiō , yea so certaine , that except Christ be damned , he cannot be damned . Whereupon they all hould that the obiect of Iustifying Fayth , is not to belieue that Christ is God and Man , was borne , dyed , and rose for vs , nor to belieue the Scripture and the word of God in it , which is a generall or historicall Fayth , and common to the reprobate , & the Diuells ; but to belieue that himselfe hath his sinnes pardoned him , is iust and shal be saued , and that God is mercifull to him , doth account him iust , and will saue him , the certainty & assurance of which doth iustify him before God. All which may be seene in the Authors owne wordes in D. Smiths Collation . This is that speciall Fayth by which alone Protestants hould that euery man is iustifyed & saued , and without which euery one is damned . Therefore this Faith is necessary to saluation necessitate medij , and as a thing so necessary , doth oblige euery one in particuler vnder paine of damnation to haue it , because by it all are saued , and without it , all are damned . Therefore true is the Minor Proposition , that as according to the Protestants , this faith alone is necessary for euery one to saluation , so euery one is bound to haue , and so to beleeue it vpon paine of the losse of his saluation . Vpon which premises , which in the first moode and figure inferre the Conclusion , followes , that according to this protestant position of Iustification & Saluation , by only & speciall Faith , that euery one whethersoeuer he belieue or no , whether he be faithful or infidel , elect or reprobate , must be saued . Which absurdityas it is most absurd , so is the same more fully illustrated and deduced out of the same principle after this manner : Speciall Faith , or infallible assurance of saluation is necessary to saluatiō , as well to Iudas a reprobat , as to Iames an elect ; and as Iames is saued by it , so is Iudas damned for want of it , according to the Protestants : therefore vnder paine of his damnation Iudas is as well bound to haue it , as Iames is ; because it being a necessary meane to saluation , the want of it is Iudas damnation , as the hauing of it is Iames his sauation . Iudas therfore ( and that which I say of Iudas , I say of all the reprobate ) is as much obliged vnder paine of his damnation , to belieue as an article of his faith , that he shal be saued , as Iames , or any elect is ? But whatsoeuer Iudas and all the reprobate or infidels are bound to belieue as an article of faith necessary to their saluation , as wel as Iames and the elect , must needs be true , and that certainly and infallibly true , whethersoeuer they do belieue it or no : Therefore it must needs be true , that as well Iudas and all the reprobate shal be saued , as Iames and the elect . The fundamental reason of which is this : All diuine Faith ( of which kind , and that the most chiefe the Protestants will haue this their Speciall Faith to be ) depends vpon diuine reuelation frō God , this reuelation supposeth truth in the obiect or thing reuealed , the obiect of truth or thing reuealed , is aeterna veritatis and true in it selfe before it be belieued , and so true whether it be belieued or no. The obiect therefore of this speciall faith , which euery one as well reprobate as elect , is bound vnder paine of his damnation to belieue , and which is the remission of his owne sinnes , his Iustification and saluation ; is , and must be aeternae veritatis , is , and must be true before it be belieued , is , and must be true whether it be belieued or no ; and so it is and must be true , that euery man , as well reprobate as elect , hath remission of sins , iustification and saluation , & it is , & was eternally true before it was belieued , and so is true whether it be belieued or no , and so , that his sinnes are remitted , he iustified and saued , whether he belieue or no. And as there cannot be giuen an instance in any other article of faith necessary to saluation , in which this reason ( which indeed is the ground of all faith ) doth not conuince that the article is true whethersoeuer it be belieued or no ; so no reason , nor answer in any reason according to the same ground of true faith , can be giuen why it should not hold good also in this act and obiect of this Special Faith , which if it be diuine faith must participat of the nature & essence of all diuine faith . Therefore it must follow that either this speciall faith is no diuine faith , but an illusion and phantasy , or if it be diuine , that this absurd absurdity must follow vpon it , that man may be saued without any faith , and that all shal be saued whether they haue any faith or none . Which is yet confirmed further by these two parities , the one diuine , the other humane : the former thus : As the Resurrection of euery man being an article of faith which euery one is bound to belieue , is true , that is , euery man shall ryse againe whethersoeuer he do beleeue it or no : so the Iustification and saluation of euery man being likewise an article which euery one is bound to belieue or else is damned , is likewise true , that is , he is iustified or saued whethersoeuer he do belieue or no. The reason of both is , because remission of sins , iustification , or saluation of euery one , being as well an obiect & article of ones faith , as the Resurrection of euery one is , they are both presuposed as true to faith , not composed and made true by faith , & so both alike eternally true , both alike true antecedent and before the act of faith , and so both true whether they be belieued or no. The later thus : As King Charles for example ( whome God preserue ) is right and lawfull King of England , whether he be by all subiects for such belieued and receaued or no , and the obligation that al subiects haue so to acknowledge & receaue him vnder paine of treason , doth suppose him to be their true King , for else it were not truly treason to refuse him : so all articles of faith , and amongst the rest this of proper saluation , are true whether they be belieued or no , and the obligation that euery one hath to belieue them ; and so this , vnder paine of damnation , doth suppose them , and this to be true , for else could none vnder paine of damnation be bound to belieue either them , or this of his Saluation . Therefore as King Charles his title and right of being King ( supposing that all are bound vnder paine of treason to receaue him ) is good whethersoeuer euery one of his subiects do belieue it , and so receaue him or no : so the truth of euery mans saluation , supposing euery one is bound vnder paine of damnation to belieue it as true , is certaine and infallibly true whethersoeuer euery one do so belieue it or no , and so shall be iustifyed and saued whether they belieue or no. Which absurdity as it is most absurd , so the Protestant principle of sole and speciall fayth , out of which it necessarily followes , must needes be absurd and false . The same absurdity may be inferred , and is seconded by other like absurd positions of some particuler Protestants , as by that position of Zuinglius , who maintained that Theseus , Hercules , Socrates , and Aristides , all Pagans , are equally with Peter and Paul in heauen ; by that of some of M. Fox his martyrs , who as himselfe recordes of them , taught that euen a Mahometan , Turke , or Sarazen may be saued if he trust in God & liue well ; by that of Puccius in Germany , of Syr William Hickman , and some of his fellowes in Lincolnshire heere in in England ( which is also too common in the simple peoples mouths ) that all men at the last shal be saued , and that God will suffer none to be damned , whome he created . All which as absurd , do inferre and second the former absurdity . Fifthly , it followeth that a man is iustified by a fayth which is in it selfe , 1. False , 2. Contradictory , 3. Sinnefull , 4. Rash , 5. Presumptuous , 6. Preiudicious to all Hope , Charity , and good life , and 7. Iniurious to Christ as he is a Redeemer , a Law-giuer , a Iudge , a Priest , and also doth make him ignorant , sinnefull , & damned , as shal be proued by euery one of these heades in particuler . And first , that this Speciall Fayth , is a fayth not true , but false , is proued thus . First , because a true fayth is of thinges reuealed by God in scripture or tradition , and proposed by the Church in practise or definition , but that either so many of so contrary religions as Lutherans , Caluinists , Anabaptists , Familists , Arians , or , that any one , in any one of these professions is predestinated , iustified , & glorified , as they all belieue , is neither reuealed in any Scripture , or Tradition from God , nor confirmed in any practise or declaration of holy Church , therefore not a true but a false fayth . 2. A true Fayth cannot perswade and propose beliefes & doctrines which are contrary , and condemne one another : but this speciall fayth persuades a beliefe , doctrine , and certainty of saluation which is contrary , and condemneth one another , as the fayth and saluation of the Lutherans , Caluinists , Anabaptists , and the rest in number aboue 100. which are all opposit in fayth , all condemne one another , and yet are all sure of their saluation by this fayth : Ergo it cannot be true . Secondly , that this fayth is contrary or contradictory in it selfe , is proued thus ; That certainty of Fayth is contradictory which belieueth a fayth and doctrine contrary or contradictory ; but by this certainty of Fayth the Lutherans , Caluinists , Libertines , Anabaptists , Trinitarians , and the rest , do belieue fayth and religions contrary and contradictory , as is manifest by the former instances , Ergo. Againe , that fayth is contradictory which doth make the same man belieue cōtradictories ; but this speciall fayth makes men belieue contradictories , as that it doth make him iust , and doth not mak him iust , Ergo. That it maks a man iust they affirme , because by it a man is iustified ; that it makes not a man iust , is proued , because by it he belieues that he is iust , therefore he is iust before he belieues it , in the same manner , as God is God before he is belieued to be God. Or thus : A man is iust before he belieue , because his iustice is the obiect of his fayth , and so presupposed to fayth , and yet he is not iust before he belieue , because this iustice is the effect of his fayth , by which he is iustified , and so is after fayth : but to be iust and not iust both , before he belieue , is cōtradictory , Ergo. Againe , that is contradictory which is good , and not good , which doth make a man iust and not iust ; but this speciall fayth is good , because it iustifyes , and not good , because it is a sin , and that mortall , Ergo. Againe , it makes a man iust , because by it he is iustified , & not iust , because by it he is made sinfull , it being a sinne as euery good worke is in their grounds . Againe , this fayth doth alone iustify , and doth not alone iustify ; alone iustify , because Caluin and all Protestants affirme it , & it alone doth not iustify because the same Caluin affirmes , that Baptisme is a signe of remission of sinnes past and to come , which remission of sinnes to come , dependes vpon the memory of Baptisme past , and so not vpon fayth only . Againe , this fayth according to them being a worke of man wholy infected with original sinne , is a sinne , and so maketh a man sinnefull , & this fayth doth iustify , and so is a good worke : but to make a man sinnefull and iust , are contrary , or contradictory , Ergo. Againe , it affirmes that euery good worke , euen the least of the best person , is a sinne ; & so there are no good workes but all sinnes ; and it affirmes that fayth cannot be without good workes , and so there are good workes ; but to affirme that there are good works , and that there are no good workes , are contradictory , Ergo. Thirdly , that this faith is a sinne , and makes a man sinfull , is proued thus . Euery good worke , euen the best worke of the best man , according to them , is a sinne , because it proceeds from a fountaine corrupted with sinne : but this faith which iustifieth is such a good worke which consequently is a sinne , therfore it maketh a man sinne , and so a man is saued from sinne by a worke which is sinne ; made iust by an act which is iniust , adopted the sonne of God by a worke which offendes God , and is made partaker of heauen by an act which deserues hell . Fourthly , That this faith is temerarious , is proued thus . That is rashly and lightly belieued which is belieued without any authority of scripture , which according to them is the only meanes of beliefe : but there is no Scripture that assures , for example , that either Caluin , Knox , or Tindall is predestinated , hath his sinnes forgiuen him , and shal be glorified in heauen , which yet they belieue , say they , more certainly by this speciall faith , then they do the diuinity birth , death , resurrection , or ascension of Christ , which they belieue onely by an historical faith , therfore they rashly and without ground do belieue it . Which is confirmed , because to belieue things they see men haue sense , to belieue morall or mathematicall conclusions , they haue reason and demonstration , and to belieue articles of faith they haue reuelation of God in scripture : but to belieue euery one that his predestination , iustification , & glorification is certaine to him , is made knowne neither by experience of sense , nor by euidence of reason , nor by reuelation of scripture , or any way else ; therefore it is rashly without ground belieued . Fiftly , That this only speciall faith is presumptuous , is proued thus : As that is desperation which will not hope for saluation by grace ; so that is presumption ( both the extreames of hope ) which will hope for it without good works , good life , obseruance of the Commandements , and merits , to which life eternall is promised : but only and speciall faith excludes all good works , all merit , all obseruance of the commandements , as any meanes of saluation , and as not possible to be done . 2. It is great presumption to expect so great and eternall a reward , kingdome , and felicity without any labour , and paines for it , without any promise , or warrant of it , and that without any doubt , or feare of the obtaining it ; all contrary to expresse scripture , which wish vs , with feare and trembling to worke our saluation (a) : Not to be without feare of sinne forgiuen (b) : And assures vs , that no man knowes whether he be worthy of loue or hatred (c) . And all contrary to the practise of all saints , who haue vsed such continuance , and feruour of prayer , such rigour , and austerity of penance , such retirement and forsaking of the world , all to obtaine and purchase it at Gods hands . Which yet this speciall faith will obtaine by only assuring and securing a man , most certainly of it , without either condition of works , and good life , without any works of penance or satisfaction , or without any doubt or feare of loosing it , or failing in it . Sixtly , That this only faith destroyes all hope , Charity , prayer , and good works , is proued thus . No man can hope for that which he hath ; no man prayes , and makes suit for that which he hath , and cannot loose ; no man labours to practise that which he deems impossible to performe . But this faith assures them of their predestination , that they are predestinate , and cannot be damned ; assures them of Gods fauour that they haue remission of sinnes , and iustification , and cannot loose it : and assures them of glorification , that they shall enioy heauen , and saluation , which is as due to them as to Christ , and can no more faile them then it can faile Christ ; where is then any place for hope ? It assures thē that good works , and the keeping of the law is impossible ; that pennance , and satisfaction is fruitlesse , yea derogating from the merit of Christ ; that all merit by grace , or hope of reward for our good deeds is excluded . That such a loue of God is required ( to wit , an intensiue loue with all the force of our soule , and an only loue which admits no kind of loue of any thing else ) as is possible only in the next life , not factible in this life : therefore by this faith is excluded all hope of reward for good works , all necessity of prayer for obteining the Kingdome of heauen , all vse of saying the Lords prayer for remission of sinnes , all fruit of penance , or satisfaction for the punishment of sinne , all possibility of doing good , liuing well , and louing of God aboue all things , and withall is included a necessity of breaking Gods Commandements , of sinning mortally , & offending in all actions , euen in the best actions of the best men , as Caluin expresly affirmes ; and yet withall this infallible assurance of the Kingdome of heauen is by this faith obteined and confirmed . Who will therfore , or needs , ( according to these principles ) to pray , to fast , to do pennance , to forbeare sinne , to bridle his concupiscence , to do good works , to loue God , and liue piously , since all are needlesse , fruitlesse , or impossible by this doctrine ? Surely whosoeuer doth either preach this doctrine of good life , works , pennance , and charity , as many moderate ministers do , or do practise in their life , and conuersation the same , as many well intending Protestants do , they cannot do it either out of the principles and grounds of their religion , which we see require no such thing , as all opposit to it ; but either out of the engrafted light of natural reason , which doth teach it ; or out of the good inclination of their natural disposition , which doth moue them to it ; or out of the principles or morall vertues which morall Philosophers haue layd for it ; or out of the doctrine , or example , & imitation or others whō they see ▪ practise it , and for the practise to deserue a laudable comendation and worthy esteeme among men by it . Seauenthdly , that this speciall & only faith doth derogate from the vertue and perfection of the incarnation and passion of our B. Sauiour Iesus Christ , is proued thus : that faith which makes our blessed Sauiour neither generall Redeemer of all , nor so much as to be their sufficient Redeemer , and which makes him neither lawgiuer , nor ●dge , nor phisitian , nor true sauiour of mankind ; and also doth make him ignorant , impotent , vniust , sinfull , desperate , and damned , doth derogate from the vertue of the incarnation , passion , resurrection , and ascension of Christ : but this only and speciall faith , and the assurance of iustification by it , doth all this , ergo . And first , that it makes Christ no generall Redeemer of all mankind is proued . 1. Because it takes away from him the vniuersality of his redemption , and the extension of his charity to all men . For though Christ shed not his blood for the Angels , neither was a Redeemer of them , whose fall was not generall of all Angells , either in indiuiduo , or in specie ( as was mans , who wholy fell and sinned , especially in Adam ) and whose sinne was more voluntary , and very pardonable , in that their vnderstanding was greater , and their tēptation lesser then was mans , whome the Diuell seduced , & whose sinne was not voluntary in their owne person , but in Adam their first father : yet least Christ should either seeme impotent that he could not , or vnmercifull that he would not shew his mercy to any estate wholy either of Angells , or of men , it did beseeme , and befit the property of his power , and goodnesse that it should shew and extend it selfe to the whole race of mankind at the least ; and that he should offer vp his bloud sufficiently for the redemption of all , and chiefly ( as he did ) of those who sinned , not actually and willingly , but by the sinne , and in the will of another , as all by originall sinne did in Adam . And as it was conuenient , so it is testified of him , That (a) he gaue himselfe a redemption for all ; that (b) he is a propitiation for our sinnes , and not for ours only , but also for the whole world ; that (c) he would haue all saued and come to the knowledge of the truth ; that (d) he is the Lambe of God which takes away the sinnes of the world ; and (e) whome God gaue , his sonne , for the world . Which word ( world ) includes rather the wicked , and reprobate , then the elect and iust . But this his generall redemption , and dying for all men is by this special Fayth quite ouerthrowne ; in that the defenders of it affirme that Christ dyed only for the elect , not the reprobate ; that this fayth is giuen only to the elect , not to the wicked , which infers that Christ was either weake and vnable , and the value of his passion insufficient , to recompence the debt of all mens sinne ▪ and that the malice of the sinne was more great in all men , then the vertue of God was powerfull in Christ ; or that Christ was more cruell in rigour of his iustice to condemne the greatest part of the world for sinne , then he was mercifull in the tender bowels of his compassion to offer vp his paines , and passion for the redemption of al from sinne . Secondly , That speciall faith makes Christ no perfect redeemer of any , no not of those elect and iust , for whome , according to them , he was borne and suffered , is proued by these 3. reasons . 1. Because they belieue not that Christ who as man did suffer , did also as God ordaine himselfe thus to suffer : nor that Christ , who , as man , did offer his sufferings to God iustly offended , and required satisfaction in iustice equiualent to the offence , did also , as God , accept of this suffering for the redemption of mans offence , though performed by a person who was without offence : nor that Christ , as mā did vndergo all paines and torments which the malice of Sathan , and man could inflict for the more copious redemption of man , ( to shew therby the goodnes of God , the greatnes of sinne , and the ingratitude of man , whereas any one action , or any one drop of bloud had beene of more worth in dignity and goodnes , then all the sinnes of all men were of value in malice and basenes ; did also , as God , giue such a dignity , worth , and value to these sufferings , that the least , or any one of them , as proceeding from the person of God , was a price sufficient to haue redeemed all the sinnes of all men , and of as many worlde 's besides as are men , if so many had beene : ( because , I say , they will not belieue this worth and value in the workes and sufferings of Christ , God and Man , to be so much infinitly greater then all the grauity of all sins of all men , as the goodnes of one God is infinitly greater thē the malice of all men ; therefore they require in the Passion of Christ the selfe same paines , and an equall degree in the same paines of Christs suffering for men , which was due , & should haue beene inflicted vpon man. Therefore , say they , as man was to suffer in body and soule , so was Christ to suffer , and did suffer , not only in body , by shedding his bloud , which as corporall auailed little : but in soule also , which for the sinnes of the soule was to suffer the paines due to the soule . And as man was to suffer the paines of hell in body & in soule , so was Christ to suffer , and did suffer all the same paines of hell , which man should haue suffered , and so was presented before the tribunall of God for man , as guilty of sinne , Feared the iudgment of God against this sinne , doubted and feared the sentence of his damnation for this sinne , and wauered betweene blessing and cursing of God , betweene praysing and blaspheming of God , vttered wordes not only of inconsideration and perturbation , but euen of desperation , and at last suffered all the paines and torments of hell in his soule vpon the Crosse , which any damned doth suffer , or ought to suffer in his soule for the same sinnes in hell . In which , 1. They deny the fulnesse and perfection of Christs redemption , euen of the elect , in that they deny the infinite excesse of dignity and value in euery action and passiō of Christ , as proceeding from his diuine person aboue the malice of sinne . 2. They doe derogate from the vertue of Christs bloud shed by his passion ( of which the Scripture affirmes , that (a) he iustified vs in his bloud ; (b) that he redeemed vs in his bloud ; (c) washed vs in his bloud ; (d) pacifyed for vs in his bloud ; (e) purchased vs with his bloud ; (f) and made his new test●ment in his bloud ; in that they affirme (g) nothing had beene done if Christ had dyed only a corporall death . 3. They do extenuate the merit of Christ , in that they auerre , (h) that in the iudgmēt of God there is no place of merit for Christ. 4. They do impose vpon our B. Sauiour horrible impiety , & blasphemy , in that they auouch him to haue doubted , feared , and wauered in his saluation , to haue beene ready to curse , and blaspheme , and to haue despaired , and suffered all the torments of the damned in hell . In all which as they impose this horrible blasphemy vpon our B. Sauiour Iesus , and make him more sinnefull and vncertaine of his saluation , then they are of theirs ; so they do most impiously derogate from the vertue of his death and passion , and from the perfection of his redēption , and in the effect thereof , euen in those elect who according to them , he only by his death saued & redeemed . Secondly , because to be a perfect , and full Redeemer of the elect , is requisite that he redeeme them from the seruitude , and misery into which by sinne they fell , which was the seruitude and misery , 1. Of sinne , into which being depriued of grace , they of themselues cannot but fall , and of themselues cannot ryse again ; you (a) are seruants of sinne . 2. Of Sathan , to whome by sinne they are made captiue , and (b) cannot of themselues resist his will. 3. Of sensuality , and the (c) law in the members repugning to the law of the mind , which of themselues they cannot maister . 4. Of the law of workes , which of themselues they cannot performe , but by it remaine vnder (d) the curse . 5. Of hell , which for their owne demerit is due to them , we (e) haue made a couenant with hell . But by this doctrine of sole fayth , that Christ did not redeem euen the elect from any of these captiuityes , and miseries , especially of sinne , Sathan , sensuality , and law of workes , nor yet from Hell , is proued . Not from the seruitude of sin , because the best man in his best workes , according to Caluin and Luther , cannot but sinne , as before , and because the iust hath no inherent grace or iustice to sanctify him from sinne , but only imputatiue , couering his sinne , and making him seeme and shew iust . Not from the seruitude of Sathan , because he wants Free-will to resist him , and so cannot but yield to his instigation , and because he still remaines in sinne both originall and actuall , and so by sinne remaines Sathās slaue . Not from the concupiscence , because it still remaynes in him , infects euery action proceeding from him ; and because , according to Caluin , not to haue concupiscence is impossible , and according to Luther , to haue a VVoman is as necessary for a man , as to eate , drinke , sleep , or as to be a man. Not frō the seruitude of the law , because the performance of the law and the doing of good workes is impossible , and because mā , though iust , remaines still guilty of the disobedience of the law . Not from the misery of hell , because while a man remaines a worker of sinne , a seruer of concupiscence , a transgressour of the law , and a slaue of Sathan ( as according to the former confessed doctrine , euen the iust and elect do ) he cannot but be subiect to hell , and hell be due vnto him : therefore if Christ redeeme not euen the elect , and iust from the seruitude either of sinne , Sathan , sensuality , the law , or hell , as by this their doctrine he doth not , he cannot be a perfect and complete Redeemer , euen of those elect , whom only , say they , he came to redeeme . Thirdly , that this doctrine makes Christ a bad Phisitiā , & worse Chirurgeon of soules , to cure them of their sinnes , is proued : Because he infuses neither grace into our soares to cure them , nor giues strength to our infirmityes to enable vs , nor extinguishes the poyson of originall sinne which still infects our actions ; but only couers our soares , and wounds with a faire cloake of his owne iustice , presents vs thus couered before God as iust , and imputes no sinnes vnto vs ; though inwardly indeed we remaine vniust , and wicked , in soule , in hart , and in all cogitations , wordes , or actions . What doth Christ therfore ? Surely no more then a Chirurgeon , who finding a man wounded , and his woundes festered , and infecting the rest of the body , should only couer the same with a faire cloath , produce , and shew him to the people thus couered , and for this cure accountes both the man safe and sound , and also himselfe a perfect Chirurgeon or Phisitian worthy of honour and reward for his paines . Such a Phisitian or Chirurgeon , according to them , is our Sauiour , and such a cure doth he worke vpon all his elect , whome he cures , and redeemes ; & no beter , for he cures not by grace infused , either the ignorance of the vnderstanding or the malice of the will , or the concupiscence of the affections , or the infirmity of the exteriour faculties : but only couers and hides them with the cloake of his iustice , and so imputes them for no sinnes , and accounts the persons iust , which is all the cure that our Phisitian Christ workes on vs in their new doctrine . Fourthly , that this doctrine makes Christ either no law-giuer at all , contrary to the Prophets who call him a Law-giuer , and to his disciple S. Iohn who sayes , he gaue a new commandement , or els such a law-giuer as makes lawes which are neither iust , vpright , nor agreable to reason , and equity , is manifest ; for either they hould that Christ made no lawes , and was no law-maker at al , but a Sauiour only , who tyed vs to none , but freed vs from all lawes , and cleared our conscience from all obligation to all lawes , from all obedience to all lawes , and from any scruple , or punishment of transgressing any law naturall , morall , or diuine , of Church or common-wealth , of God , or of man , and by the liberty of his Ghospell gaue vs freedome to do what we will , to omit , or comit what we will , without condition or obligation , but only to belieue , and assure our selues that we are sure to be saued . Or if they admit any obligation of keeping any lawes , as the morall law of the ten Commandement , or other , they auerre it to be impossible to keep them , euen for the iust and perfect , though assisted with the help of grace , whereby they make God cruell in imposing that vpon vs , which we are not able to performe ; vniust in punishing vs for that which he enforces vs to commit ; & vnreasonable , in charging vs aboue our ability , & in punishing vs for not doing that which we could not do . As afterward is more at large shewed . Fiftly , That this faith doth take from Christ all authority either of iudging at all , or of iudging vprightly , & so makes him either no iudge , or an vniust iudge , is proued ; Because in a iudge is requisite , 1. That he vnpartially discusse , and examine the cause . 2. That he duely reward the iust . 3. That he iustly punish the offender . But this doctrine leaues no place for discussion of sinnes , because , according to it , all works are sinnes , as proceeding from originall sinne , and infected with originall sinne , and all sinnes are a like great as equally forbid by the law of sinne , which forbids as well , and vnder as great penalty ( at least in generall ) of death & damnatiō , the theft of a pin as of a pound : therfore all discussiō of this difference is needlesse where no difference among them in greatnesse is admitted . 2. It leaues no place for reward of God workes , in that it admits neither any workes to bee before God good , nor any persons to be inwardly iust , nor any merit to be possible by any worke , or person , nor any reward to be due to any merit ; but where neither worke is good , nor person iust , nor merit deseruing , there can be no iustice of remuneration in rewarding either good works , or iust persons . 3. It leaues no place to the iust punishing of the wicked , for where all persons are either already iudged , and sure to be punished , as the Infidels and Pagans are , for he that belieues not , is already iudged ; or shall not at all be iudged , nor punished , as all faithfull ( Protestants ) shall not , who are sure to be saued ; where the thing commaunded is impossible to be done , or the law commaunding doth not oblige to the doing ; where God doth ordeine that thing to be dōne , and compels the person to do it ; where the person commaunded hath neither ability to do the thing commaunded if he would , nor yet fredome of will to do it if he could , there can be no place of iustice in the lawmaker to punish the fact thus committed , or the person committing it . But so it is according to the former Protestant doctrine . Therfore , according to the same , Christ cannot at the day of iudgment iudge any , or at the least not iustly ; and cannot be either a iudge , or at least not a iust iudge , according to euery mans works . Sixtly , That this doctrine doth bereaue Christ of his priesthood , and power of sacrificing , and offering for sinnes , is proued thus : As in all states of nature cerimonall , or grace , sinnes were committed ; so in all states were sacrifices ordeined for remission of sinnes , and priests appointed to offer for the same . In the law of nature the sacrifice was voluntary , & the priest was the eldest of the family . In the law of Moyses the sacrifice was determined to certaine beasts , birds , and meates , and the priests were Aarons posterity , and the tribe of Leui. In the law of grace the sacrifice is the body and bloud of Christ , and the priests are Christs Apostles , and who are consecrated by lawfull orders from them . Christ , as in persō so in his Priesthood and sacrifice , he surpassed both the eldest of the family in the law of nature , and the Leuiticall priests , & the sacrifice of both ; for they were only men , he was God & man ; they were men sinfull , he was not polluted with sinne , they as men and sinners are far distant from God , to whom , & like to men in sinne for whom , they offer ; he as participating of God to whom , and of man for whome , he offers , is one , & imediate with both . They offered often , and many times , as wanting one full price able to make a full redemption at once ; he offered once for all , and that a full price & satisfaction sufficient for all . They were annointed with materiall oyle of oliues ; he with internall oyle of Deity aboue his companions . They offered sacrifices many in kind , and meane in quality , all inferiour to themselues ; he offered one and that most iust euen himselfe , and his owne body & bloud : of which sacrifice himselfe was , 1. The priest , annointed by his incarnation to offer . 1. The sacrifice ordeined by himselfe , an hoast to be offered . 3. The temple consecrated to God for his holy offering . 4. The Altar in his body which was sprinckled with the bloud of this offering ; for all which reasons Abraham , and the Leuit●all priests in him ▪ and in his soines as inferiour , offered tithes to Melchisedech as superiour , and in Melchisedech to Christ figured by him as the chiefe of all . The sacrifices Christ offered were of two sorts , both of them one , and the same in substance , to wit , his owne body and bloud , but diffe●ing and diuerse in the manner of offering ; the one on the Crosse , the other at the supper ; the one bloudy , the other vnbloudy ; the one , in his owne forme of man , visible , the other , in the forme of bread and wine , inuisible ; The one once , and not reiterated , as being a sufficient price of our redemption , the other often , as the application of the former , and that often repeated as sinnes are often committed . By the one purchasing to himselfe his Church in his bloud , by the other conseruing & sanctifiyng the same to himselfe by his grace . By the one , as a cause meritorious deseruing grace , pacifying God , and reconciling man to God ; by the other as an instrument causing grace , sanctification , satisfaction , and actuall remission of sinnes ; for by it , as by Baptisme , is wrought remission of sinnes , and , as by fayth , hope , charity , and other vertues , is obteined grace and saluation , Now sith it is euident that Christ was , 1. a Priest . 2. According to the order , not of Aaron , but of Melchisedech . 3. For euer . Sith it is euident also , 1. That a Priest and sacrifice are correlatiue and so mutuall , that where the one is , there the other must be . 2. That Melchisedech was a Priest , and his sacrifice was in bread and wine . 3. That Christ is compared to Melchisedech , not only in his kingly authority , as King of iustice and peace as Melchisedech was , nor only in his genealogy , as being without Father as man , and without mother as God , or without predecessor before him , or successor after him in the office of redeemer , as Melchisedech is said to be without Father & mother ; but also in priestly function ( concealed on purpose by S. Paul for the incapacity of the Iews , as a thing of which he hath a speech great and inexplicable to vtter ) and in his priestly sacrifice by offering bread & wine as Melchisedech did , and that not for one time , but for euer . Sith , I say , all this is euident , it followes , 1. That Christ is a priest , not according to Aaron in offering bloud , but according to Melchisedech in offering bread and wine , and that not once by himselfe , but for euer by his Apostles and Priests , to whom he gaue commission to offer the same sacrifice which himselfe had done . 2. It followes , that to verify Christs being priest for euer according to the order of Melchisedech , there must be a succession of priests and sacrifice in Gods Church to offer the same sacrifice for euer , & so to make his priesthood continue for euer . But by this former Protestant doctrine is excluded all sacrifice for sinne , all priesthood to offer sacrifice , and all holy orders to consecrat priests ; and so this perpetuall priesthood and sacrifice of Christ according to Melchisedech , is reiected . First in Christ himselfe and his owne person whome they deny to haue offered any sacrifice at his last supper . Secondly , in his Priests and deputies , to whome they deny all authority of Priesthood , and all power to offer sacrifice , and so admit no sacrifice at all according to the order of Melchisedech , either by Christ , or his Church , and why ? Because only Fayth doth iustify , satisfy , and apply the merit of Christ , only Fayth doth couer all sinnes by the apprehension of the iustice of Christ , only Fayth doth assure all that they are iust , shall continue , and that they need no other worke , Sacrament , or sacrifice to make or keep them iust , but only Fayth , and so this Fayth destroyes all sacrifice , & therby the Priesthood of Christ . Lastly , that this doctrine bereaues Christ of his knowledge , both beatificall , by which from the first instance of his conception he did clearely see God ; and also infused , and that not out of thinges naturall , and by accidents infused , which by nature , and industry may be obtained , but also of thinges supernaturall , and per se infused , of things which are by fayth reuealed to vs , such as are the mysteries we belieue , and the secrets of harts , all which by ancient Deuines is admitted to haue beene in Christ from the first instant of his conception : That , I say , they depriue Christ of all this excellency and knowledge , and make him ignorant , and more ignorant then Adam , who was created as in perfection of stature , and strength of body , so also in perfection of all philosophicall and theologicall knowledge in soule , by which he gaue names to all beasts ; and more ignorant then Salomon , who was the wisest of men before or after him , is proued : Because they affirme that he (a) assumed our ignorance , that he was ignorant like other children , was instructed as boyes are , increased in knowledge not only experimentall , but also habituall as others do , learned and profited in artes and sciences humane and diuine as children do ; that he was iignorant of the place of Lazarus his bur●all , of the Iewes fayth who offered the man sicke of the palsy ; of the Figge-tree , both of what kind it was , and what fruit it bore ; and of the day of iudgment , not only to reueale it to others , but to know it himselfe ; that he made farre-fetcht-similitudes , and needlesse illations nothing to purpose , wrested the wordes and sense of the Prophets , weakly confuted his aduersaries , failed in memory , and made prayers and petitions vnaduised , and not premeditated , forced with the vehemency of sorrow in the garden : all which are by Caluin imputed to him . But if Christ was thus ignorant and blind in his vnderstanding , then might he be deceaued in his iudgement , and so deceaue others , and faile in truth of that he sayd , or reuealed in Scripture ; then may the scripture be false , his fayth and doctrine be false , all Christians be lead into errour and blindnes ; then may he be infirme in his operations , and sinfull also in his actions . For if the vnderstanding , which is the light to lighten , and the guide to direct the other faculties of the soule , may be blind , ignorant , inconsiderate , and erroneous ; then may the will which doth follow the light , and direction of the vnderstanding , and wils nothing but that the vnderstanding knowes , also faile in the election of good , and so will that is ill , and commit sinne ; and so may Christ , who is the Way , the Truth , and the Life , fall into errour , falshood , and sinne , and so erre , deceaue and commit sinne . To all which if we adde the detestable , and blasphemous assertions boldly auerred by prime Protestants Luther , Caluin and their fellowes against Christ , to wit , that God made him a sinner , vniust , guilty and hatefull to himselfe , that he was culpable , a sinner true , and most truly a sinner as other men , a sinner most great , most vile , and obnoxius to the anger of God , that he carried himselfe vncurteously , and not like a sonne to his mother , that he made a prayer vnpremeditated , a vow abrupte , inconsiderate , contrary to his vocation , to be corrected , retracted , and renounced ; that he renounced his office of mediatour , was forgetfull of our saluation , and the charge committed to him ; that he confessed his effeminate nicenesse , esteemed himselfe not to be sent of God , did wauer betweene praising and blaspheming of God , did stagger among the waues of tentations , vttered words of desperation , was ouercome with desperatiō , did renounce his saluation , knew God was angry at him ; that he stood in need of Baptisme , was cursed and execrable as commonly the damned are ; that he suffered the horrour of a conscience feeling Gods eternall wrath , did feare , and highly despaire in his soule in the same manner a● the damned , did wauer betweene hell and life , struggle with the horrour of eternall paines ; had an horrour of eternall punishment , was tormented with the feare of horrible damnation , was horribly afraid of the profound abisse of death , was in feare to be absorpt by death , was stroken with the horrour of the diuine malediction , was tortured with anxiety as if he had God his enemy , feared his saluation , was perswaded that he was vndonne , and was striken with the horrour of Gods iudgment more then euer any man was , or could be , in which his horrour consisted the summe of our consolation ; that he suffered the same paines of hell which the damned do suffer , tasted , felt , and suffered the true paines or dolours of hell , the infernall paines and sorrowes of hell , was in the middest of the torments of hell , suffered the paine of hell , the same paine and punishment with the damned , the horrible torments of a damned man , the eternall paines for the time , the execrable death , the second death which is the death of the soule , the separation from God , felt , tasted , and endured the eternall death , the anguish of hell , the torments in hell after death both in his body and soule : All which are the very summe , and abridgement , without adding or agrauating of any one word , of the more ample speaches and sentences of the most famous Protestant Doctours , and maisters , as Luther , Melancthon , Illyricus , Reineccius , Lobecius , Hutterus , Vrsinus , Paraeus in Germany ; of Caluin , Beza , Daneus in Geneua ; of Tilenus Piscator , Molinaeus , Polanus in France ; of Vorstius , Homius , in the Low-countries ; and of Whitaker , Perkins , and Parkes in England ; and may be seene at large in the learned Collation of the Right reuerend Bishop D. Smith . If I say we adde all these execrable , horrible , and blasphemous assertions against the eternal Maiesty & goodnesse of the sonne of God , and compare them with the infallible certainty , and assurance which they make euery one of their owne predestination , iustification , and glorification , of which by faith they make themselues so certaine as if Christ had beene present and said they shal be saued ; so sure as they are sure that there is a God , or that Christ is saued , which are likewise at large in the same Author faithfully collected : If , I say , we adde all this impiety , blasphemy , and infidelity which is vented , and inuented by this priuate spirit , and both practised , preached , and printed by the chief professors of the same , and so diuulged to the vew of the whole world to be belieued and professed of all as the word , and the pure word of God , as the honour , and greatest honour of God , & Iesus Christ ; I see not what greater hypocrisy , & dissimulation , what deeper blasphemy , and abomination can be vttered , or by what meanes a readier or broader way to the subuersion of all Christianity , and piety , and the erection of all Atheisme , & Barbarisme can be made , and prepared . And thus much of the absurdities which ensue vpon the priuate spirits doctrine , of sole , speciall , and certaine iustifying faith , & the consequēt points of doctrine depending vpon it . Absurdities which follow vpon the third head , that is , of Concupiscence being originall sinne . SECT . IIII. OVT of the third principle , or progeny of this priuate spirit , and the doctrine hanging vpon it , which is , that originall sinne ( which they make to be Concupiscence ) doth remaine in the regenerate , and iust , is not remitted , or abolished by Baptisme ; but only not imputed , and couered by faith ; doth corrupt the whole man , & all his actions , internall and externall , doth staine with sinne all good works euen the best of the best men ; doth strike dead all freewill , liberty to do well ; doth strangle all inherent iustice and sanctification ; doth stope all merit , satisfaction , and pennance ; and doth set a stay to all possibility of keeping the cōmandements , with such other like now paradoxes ensuing vpon it : out of this , I say , it followes , first . That the whole Protestant Church , and their spouse of Christ which consists only of such elect , and regenerat persons as these , is ( if we may so tearme it ) a kingdome , a Citty , a temple , a house , a spouse , a body of Christ ( by which termes the true Church of Christ is stiled ) consisting of subiects , Citizens , seruants , persons , and members , who in euery action , euery good worke , euen in the best worke of the best of them , do sinne , nothing but sinne , and cannot but commit sinne , and that mortally ; all whose thoughts , words , and deeds are sinnes , mortall sins , damnable sinnes , and they by these sinnes are vncleane , polluted , vniust , and full of malice in the sight of God ; who are not able to obserue , keepe , or performe any one , much lesse all the commandements of God , as impossible , and not obliging vpon any condition to saluation ; who are idolaters , blasphemers , forswearers , breakers of the sabboth , adulterers , murtherers , theeues , false witnesses , either in externall action , or in internall desire , in which they must needs breake euery commandement ; who cannot by any one act , once in all their life , belieue , feare , praise , or loue God , as they ought ; who haue no inward grace , vertue , or iustice inherent , and infused in their soules ; but all sinne , deformity , pollution , rebellion , and contumacy against God , and his commandements ( which are also the very words of the foresaid Protestants cited by the foresaid authour ; ) who are as pointed faces , of themselues deformed , and only by colours made to shew faire ; as sepulchers of dead men outwardly whited ; but within dead bodies ; As wolues couered with the woll of sheep , but inwardly rauenous ; As foolish virgins who haue no oyle in their owne lampes , but thinke that others oyle shall suffice them ; As bodies stemed , and stinking with corruption of rottenesse , leprosy , and ordure , and only couered with faire cloathes made of the silke of Christs iustice : Such are all elect , iust , regenerate , and holy Protestants ; of such consists their congregations , & Church , and with such is filled their kingdome of heauen , & by such are Catholiks condemned and persecuted heere in England . Secondly , it followes that any faythfull , iust , and regenerate Protestant may ( in respect of any pitt of damnation ) as well commit theft , murder , adultery , periury , idolatry , sacriledge , incest , and all enormous vices , as exercise himselfe in abstinence , continency , iustice , almes-deeds , or , as read the Bible , heare a sermon , receaue the Communion , say his prayers , belieue , loue , or prayse God , and the like . For as both the one , and the other proceed from originall sinne , & are infected thereby with the staine of sinnes , and that mortall , deseruing eternall damnation ; so are neither the one , nor the other kind imputed to him for sinnes , nor are punished with damnation as sinnes . As both the one , and the other are damnable in the reprobate , and he for both shall be punished in hell , so neither the one nor the other are imputed to the elect , nor he for either can be hindred from heauē . As in both the elect , and reprobate , workes are not distinguished by the obiect , but by the person , being all mortall sinnes in themselues ; so in the reprobate all are mortall ; in the elect all veniall , all pardoned , none imputed , none punished . And as the good workes in the elect do not merit any reward of glory , nor satisfy for any punishment of sinne ; so the bad workes in the same elect shall not receaue any infliction of punishment , neither depriue him of any benefit of iustification ; both therefore the good & the bad are in themselues great sinnes , as proceeding from concupiscence , which is sinne , and as violating the law , but both are by fayth not imputed , both by the iustice of Christ couered , and so both in a sort indifferent to be committed or omitted , as both deseruing , and neither receauing punishment ; both being sinnes in themselues , and neither imputed for sinnes by God. Vpon what motiue or ground therefore of religion , either of displeasing God , or of hope of reward , or of feare of hell , can a regenerate Protestant be induced to auoid sinnes , rather then good workes , or to liue vertuously rather then vitiously , sith both are mortall sinnes , both mortally offend God , and both equally are not imputed , neither punished . Thirdly , it followes , that any faythfull and regenerate Protestant may according to the groundes of his fayth , commit any , or all the former sinnes , yea all the sinnes which any reprobate doth commit , and yet remaine a iust , regenerate , and perfect protestant . For if faith only doth iustify , & once had can neuer be lost by any sinne whatsoeuer , & if no sinnes be imputed , but all be by the same faith remitted ; then may he cōmit any , or all the said sinnes , and yet retaine faith and iustification , and keep his assurance of saluation , and so continue still a perfect regenerate Protestant , and is as high in perfection , as strong in faith , and as sure of saluation as any Saint is in heauen who neuer committed any of the same . What conscience therefore , or scruple will he make of any the said sinnes , sith he shall receiue by them no losse of faith , no detriment of iustice , no displeasure of God , no punishment of hell ? Fourthly , it followes , that in vaine , and to no end is all penance and sorrow for sinnes , all chastising of our bodies , which S. Paul vsed for sin , all fasting , sackcloth , hairecloth , or ashes , with Dauid , the Niniuites , Manasses , Achab , and others before Christ vsed for their sins ; That in vaine , & to no end is all forsaking the vanities , and pleasures of the world , all abnegation , resignation , mortification , and taking vp the crosse of Christ in deserts . Monasteries , & places secluded from the world , and chosen for practise of pouerty , obedience , & chastity , which S. Marke , S. Hilarion , S. Paul , S. Anthony , S. Gregory Nazianzen , S. Basil , S. Augustine , S. Benedict , S. Bernard , and so many ancient and holy Saints , and Religious persons since Christ haue euer vsed 1. because only faith doth iustify , and secure them of saluation , and doth take away all imputation of any sinne , or paine due to sinne , and so makes needlesse all satisfaction for sinne . 2. Because Baptisme , which ( according to Caluin , is to be ministred only to the faythfull ) doth remit all sinnes past and to come . 3. Because all these actes are sinnes , and that mortall , as well as feasting lusting , deceauing , killing , and the rest . Fiftly , it followes , that in vaine , and to no end are all lawes either of God , Church , or Commonwealth ; in vaine are all Tribunals , and Courtes spirituall , and temporall ; in vaine are all Iudges , and Magistrates appointed to correct & punish malefactours ; in vaine is all power , and iurisdiction of Princes or Prelates ; in vaine is all Regall authority , and commaund of Emperours , Kinges , and Princes , because all obseruance of any law , or of any one commandement , euen the least , is impossible , and a burthen ( sayth Caluin ) greater then Aetna ; because no Prince or Prelate hath any authority to make any law which shall oblige in conscience ; because by the liberty of the Ghospell euery Protestant is freed from any obligation in conscience , and from any lawes of any Prince , whereupon any malefactour guilty of murder , theft , or the like , may answere the Iudge , and alleadge their doctrine , that the lawes did not oblige in conscience , and were impossible to be performed , no freewill to do otherwise thē God had determined , no obligation in conscience to obey the Kinges Lawes , being freed by the liberty of the Ghospell ; that the Iudge hath no authority to execute that which the King had no authority to decree ; no iustice to punish him for that which God forced and willed him to do , and which he had no liberty , or power but to do ; no reason to hinder the liberty of his spirit graunted by the Ghospell . The traitour and Rebell may answere his King , and alledge out of the same liberty of this Ghospell , the same reasons , and say , that he is as free from obedience to his owne Prince as to a forain Prince , or from the lawes of his owne Country as of a forraine Country , may resist his Prince and his lawes , ryse and rebell against him , oppose and depose , yea kill and murther his person in case he do not iustice , obserue not his own law , defend not the common-wealth , or giue not free passage to the preaching of their Ghospel . Which ( as after shal be shewed ) they haue in Germany , France , Scotland , Belgia , Geneua , & other countryes , according to these groundes practised , and approued ; and which the Trinitarians , and Anabaptists do according to the same , yet positiuely maintaine and defend . In vaine therefore did God giue (a) to Kinges power from himselfe and vertue from the highest . In vaine do (b) Kings rule by God & makers of lawes decerne iu●t thinges . In vaine is (c) all power from God , and higher powers , to be obeyed . In vaine are we to be (c) subiect to higher powers not only for anger , but for conscience . In vaine are we admonished to (d) be subiect to Kinges and Rulers , and sent from God ; to be (e) subiect to Princes , and powers , to be (f) obedient to carnall Lordes , and Maisters in feare and trembling ; to (g) honour them with all honour ; to (h) giue to Caesar that which is Caesars . In vaine is the King made the head , and ruler of the common-wealth . In vaine doth he make lawes , inflict punishments , appoint Iudges , iustices , and Magistrates , sith subiects haue no liberty to obey , or not obey them ; no tye in conscience not to violate them ; but by the liberty of their Ghospell , are freed from all , and the thinges also are either impossible to be done , or if omitted , it is without any sinne , more then veniall at the most , that is , not imputed . In vaine and foolishly do they condemne Popes for assuming power to declare Princes deposed , or to depose them in case of extreme necessary to conserue the true fayth of God , and the right authority of the Church , or to preuent the grieuous calamity of the common good , sith euery one among them may doe the same , and more vpon his priuate authority , to right his owne priuate wronge . In vaine & foolishly doe they accuse , and condemne Popes for deposing Emperours , & Kinges , as Gregory the second did Leo Isauricus , Zachary did Chilpericke the King of France , Gregory the 7. did Henry the 4. Innocent the 3. did Otho the 4. Alexander the 2. did Iohn of England , and the like , since they themselues in so short a tyme haue deposed two Queenes in Scotland , one Bishop of Geneua , and by armes laboured to depose one Queene of England , two Kings of France , three Kinges of Spaine , three Emperours of Germany from their temporall right , and dominion . All which are lawfull , and warrantable , according to these grounds of their Fayth , that no lawes are possible , or oblige in conscience , that no bad workes are imputed , or hinder saluation , that the liberty of the Ghospell makes all actions free and voluntary , that only fayth doth iustify , and cannot be lost , that no man hath freewill , nor can do otherwise thē God hath decreed . Which positions ouerthrow all duety of obedience , and all obligation of duty to any Prince . Sixtly , it followes , that in vaine , and to no end are all consultations , and deliberations of thinges to be done , eithe● by priuate persons in their priuate affaires , or by publike Councellours of Princes for the publicke good , because all in both must be as God hath decreed , and man hath no more free-will to do otherwise then he is determined , then he hath not to be a man as he was created . In vaine are all precepts , and lawes of doing or not doing , going or staying , bargayning , buying , or selling , because man hath neither freedome of will , nor obligation in conscience to do them , more then to reach heauen with his fingar . In vaine are all exhortations either priuate or publicke , in sermons or in familiar speaches , by preachers , parents , or friends , either from euill , or to good , to one study or other , to one course of life or other , to one worke or other , because man hath no more power , or freedome of will to choose any of them , then he hath freedome to cure himselfe of the goute , or an ague , or restore his arme that is cut off . In vaine and to no end are either terrours , and threats of punishment , or promises , and hopes of reward either , prayses & commendations of good , and dispraises and reprehensions of bad deedes , because neither are any deeds in themselues good , but bad before God , nor is any man more free , and able to do the one , rather thē the other , then he is to moue mountaines , or to adde height to his stature . To what end therefore are Maisters offended with the negligence of seruants ? Doe parents correct the vndutifullnes of their children ? Do Princes punish the rebellion , or offences of their subiects ? Do Preachers reprehēd the vices of their auditours , or exhort them to workes of piety , and charity , disswade them from actions of sinne , and iniquity ? Sith the workes be both alike sinnes , do both alike violate the precept , and are both alike forgiuen , and not imputed , sith the lawes do not oblige in conscience , and are impossible to be kept , sith the parties haue no power , or freedome to do the one , more then the other ; but all as by the decree of God , and force of their originall concupiscence are forced , and necessitated to do it . Seauenthly , it followes , that in vaine , and to no end , doth any Protestant make any scruple of conscience ( which needes not , as a law to direct , as a thousand witnesses to accuse , as a iudge to condemne or cleare , as an executioner to torment and torture him , as it doth other men for their sinnes vnrepēted ) because where no sinne is imputed , where no Free-will is admitted , where no good worke , or obseruation of any commandement is possible , where no law of God or man doth oblige in conscience to performāce , what needs any conscience to torment , or trouble it selfe with the guilt of any law infringed , with the sting of any iniustice committed , with the scruple of any good worke omitted ; since neither the law could be fullfilled , nor the act could be preuented , nor any punishment shal be inflicted , nor God offended ? Why should therfore be studied any cases of conscience ? Why should be admitted any Chancery , or Court of conscience ? Why should there be any confession of sinnes secret , or any restitution of debts , and monyes secret , any forbearance of wrong secret , when there is no feare or shame of man ? Why shall therefore any Protestant in life , or at death trouble his conscience , or haue any scruple of any good worke omitted , of any secret murther committed , of any iniustice , rapine cruelty , periury , bribery , sorcery practised , or of any heresy , idolatry , or infidelity , of any Iudaisme , Turcisme , or Atheisme belieued , followed , or perswaded ? Surely he needes not , for one dramme of fayth , of speciall fayth , of apprehension of Christs iustice , compounded with an impossibility of performing the law , with the necessity of mans wil , with the liberty of the Ghospell , and with the certainty of present and future iustification , will purge all this melancholy , feare and scrupulosity , and leaue the soule cleare of any doubt , feare , timidity , or vncertainty of heauen , for any whatsoeuer sinnes , and offences howsoeuer , or by whomesoeuer committed . Out of all which former absurdities , we may obserue these differences betweene a Protestant and a Catholike , & a iust man of the one , and a iust man of the other ; that , 1. A Protestant belieues a fayth which neuer any Prince , Prelate , or people , neuer any Doctour , Confessour , or Martyr , neuer any Councell prouinciall , or generall belieued for 1500. and more yeares before Luther . The Catholike belieues the same which all Princes Christian , all Prelates and people reputed true Christians , all Confessours , Martyrs , and Saints , all Councels generall no fewer then eighten , and all prouinciall aboue 100. haue euer since Christ professed and belieued . Secondly , a Protestant belieues a fayth which falsifyeth and frustrateth the predictions of the Prophets , the promises of Christ , the preaching of the Apostles , the mission of Pastours , the succession of Prelates , the ordination of Priests the vertue of miracles , the constancy of Confessours , the purity of Virgins , the bloud of Martyrs , and the vnity , sanctity , antiquity , and vniuersality of the Catholicke Church ▪ the Catholike belieues and professes a fayth which verifies , and confirmes all the former , and in which they agree in beliefe , and profession with them all . Thirdly , the Protestants belieue a fayth which hath lesse authority , credibility , and motiues of persuasion , such as are miracles , vnity , vniuersality , and others to persuade , and make it credible , then hath the fayth of Iewes , Turkes , or Pagans : the Catholikes belieue that which hath vnity , visibility , vniuersality , antiquity , sanctity , prophecies , miracles , monuments of piety , charity , bounty , and all reasons of probability to persuade , and make it credible . Fourthly the Protestant is made iust by a speciall fayth , of which is no mention either in any Scripture , Tradition , Councell , or Father , and which neither Doctour , Father , Prelate , Prince , Prouince , people or person in the world before them belieued , and professed as a sauing , and iustifying fayth : the Catholicke is made iust by a Catholike fayth which hath beene generall , vniuersall , & wholy by all people , Prelates , and Princes , in all tymes and places acknowledged , and professed . Fifthly , the Protestāt is made iust by a fayth , by which all the seed and posterity of Abraham , Noe , and Adam , yea all Iewes , Gentils , Turks , Heretikes , & wicked blasphemers , idolaters , murtherers , sacrilegious and incestuous persons which haue beene , or shal be till the worlds end , may as well be saued and assured of their saluation , as they themselues : the Catholike is made iust by a fayth , by which only they who belieue truly , and liue piously , or repent and amend faithfully , can be iustified and saued . Sixthly , the Protestant is made iust by a speciall fayth , which is false , as belieuing many pointes for true which yet are contrary one to another ; which is contradictory , as houlding positions contradicting one another ; which is sinneful , as being a sinne and that mortall , as all their good works are ; which is presumptuous , presuming without grace to be made holy , without merit to attaine a reward , without mās owne labour , and concurrence to be crowned with the glory of heauen ; which is iniurious to hope which it destroies by certainty ; to charity which it maks impossible to do good workes , all which it turnes into sinnes , and that mortall : The Catholikes are iustifyed by a fayth which admits none of the former absurdities , but is true , humble , vniforme , pious , and a foundation for hope , charity , and good life . Seauenthly , the Protestant is iustifyed by a fayth which derogates from the redemption of Christ , making it neither vniuersall for all , nor perfect for any , nor able to cure one mā ; but is only an apprehension of iustice , only a couer for sinne , only a conceit that a man is iust , when he is assured he is vniust ; which makes Christ neither vpright lawyer , for that he makes lawes impossible to be kept ; nor iust Iudge for that he giues neither reward , or punishment according to deedes and deserts ; nor perpetuall Priest , for that he offers no sacrifice at all , or but only that one of the Crosse ; which makes Christ ignorant , getting by degrees knowledge as other men ; impotent not able to satisfy sinne but with suffering all the paines euen those of hell due to sinne ; inconsiderate , as making prayers & vowes vnaduised , and not premeditated ; sinnefull in staggering between praysing , and blaspheming God , betweene hope and feare of saluation , doubting and despairing of his owne saluation , and lastly damned in hell , and suffering all the paines therein which any damned do : The Catholike is iustifyed by a fayth which makes Christ a perfect Redeemer ( of his part ) of all men from all sinnes , & from all both guilte , and paine of sinne ; a iust law giuer in his lawes , which are easy , and in his iudgments which are according to euery mans workes ; a potent Sauiour , who by one action of his diuine person is able to satisfy for all sinne ; a person alwayes perfect in all knowledge , alwayes immaculate without any the least spot of sinne , and alwayes blessed , and glorified with the vision and fruition of God euen from his conception . And thus much a Protestant and Catholike differ in the points of a iustifying fayth . Looke further yet into the soule , and persons of the one and the other . 8. A iust Protestant hath originall sinne remayning in him ; a iust Catholike hath it taken away from him . 9. The one is inwardly infected , corrupted , and rotten in sinne ; the other is inwardly pure , sound , beautifull , & adorned with grace . 10. The one hath all his actions stained polluted , and made damnable by the infection of his original sinne ; the other hath many of his actions gracious , liuely , and made meritorious by grace . 11. The one in all his actions euen the best doth offend and displease God ; the other in all his actions which are not bad doth honour & please God. 12. The one by his good actions deserues nothing but eternall damnation ; the other by his good deedes deserues eternall saluation . 13. The one is iust only before man , and by God esteemed iust , though he be internally and indeed vniust ; the other is iust before God , and internally , and really indeed iust . 14. The one hath no deformity , or guilt of sinne washed , cured , or taken away , but only not imputed ; the other hath all guilt washed , cleansed , & abolished by inherent iustice & grace . 15. The one hath neither power , nor liberty to do any good worke ; the other assisted by grace , hath free-to do good . 16. The one cannot performe any one commandement ; the other by grace can performe them all . 17. The one cannot resist but yield to euery motion of concupiscence ; the other can , and doth by grace resist ill motions . 18. The one cannot loue God , praise him , feare , or honour him in any action ; the other can do it , by Gods grace in all his actions . 19. The one cannot increase in iustice or grace , but is as iust at the first instant of his iustification , as euer ; the other can , and doth become more iust , patient , humble , and charitable . 20. The one may commit any sinne , though of murder , adultery , blasphemy , heresy , or idolatry , and yet remaine iust , and not loose his iustice , nor the fauour of God ; the other may , and must auoid all the same , or the like sinnes least he loose grace , and be damned . 21. The one , let him do what he will , is sure he shal be saued , and cannot by any sinne be damned , except Christ be damned ; the other with feare and trembling doth labour to make his election and saluation , by good works sure . 22. The one needs to make no conscience of breaking any law of God , or man ; because neither oblige in conscience , and both are impossible to be performed : the other thinks himselfe tyed in conscience to performe both . 23. The one , though he sinne , needs no more but only by faith to assure himselfe his sinne is couered by the iustice of Christ , and not imputed to him : the other , if he sinne , must haue hope , charity , contrition , confession , and satisfaction , penance , and purpose of amendment to sinne no more . 24. The one laies all the burthen of his sinnes vpon Christ , and his satisfaction , and himselfe rests idle and secure : the other by the vertue of the same merit of Christ labours with all austerity to satisfy himselfe , as far as by grace he can , and to do his endeauour to pacify God. Now whether of these two estates , the former of the Protestant , or the later of the Catholick be more honourable to God , more agreable to piety , more worthy to be esteeme in themselues , and so more to be preferred by man , let the indifferent Reader iudge , and make choice . Of absurdities which follow vpon the fourth head , that is , of absolute predestination to damnation . SECT . V. SVBDIV. 1. Protestants doctrine of Predestination makes men desperate , and Atheists . OVT of the fourth principle , or daughter of his priuate spirit , and the issue or consequences ensuing therupon , which are , that God hath decreed and ordained , and that without any foresight , or respect to any sinne , originall of Adam , or actuall of man , that those who are damned , should be damned only because it was his will and pleasure , and for that end did likewise ordaine that they should sinne , did by his will and decree excite and compell them to sinne , by his motion did effect , and worke in them that sinne , and obdurate and harden them in sinne , necessitate them without free-will to sinne , command the diuell to solicit them to sinne & both the diuell , and other wicked persons , and the sinners themselues being only as instruments to effect this sinne , himselfe only being the chiefe worker of sinne ; wherby man hath no power but to sinne , no meanes of Christs merits to helpe him out of sinne , no benefit of vocation , faith or grace possible to cure his sinne ; and so vpon necessity , do what he will , he must sinne , be damned , and go to hell for his sins . Out of this doctrine , which in expresse wordes is Caluins & his fellowes , follow many absurdityes , both in respect of man who sins and is damned , & also in respect of God who makes him sinne , & damnes him . In regard of man two absurdities follow ; the one whereby some are made meere polititians and of no Religion at all , but libertines of any : another wherby others are made desperate without any hope or care of saluation , by any meanes in any Religion at all . The first absurdity of Politicians , is this : God from all eternity hath appointed , and determined of vs , without any respect of vs , or our workes , whether we shal be saued or damned . If we shall be saued , he will saue vs : if damned , he will damne vs ; both which as he hath decreed without vs , so both he will effect without vs. Infallibly , therfore as God hath decreed without vs ; so shal we be saued , or damned do what we can . What therefore haue we to do with eternity of saluation or damnation ? VVhat with fayth , or Christ the meanes thereunto , but leaue that to God , and his ordination ; let vs follow our temporall commodities , and imbrace our sensuall pleasures , which are in our power , let vs cast off all consideration of heauen , or hell , and leaue that to God as he ordained , disposed , and reserued to his owne will and power . Thus may they reason , & that consequently out of the former principle ; and thus haue both Libertins , & Politicians reasoned , and thereupon inferred that with Catholikes they may be a Catholike , with Lutherans a Lutheran , with Caluinists a Caluinist , with Iewes a Iew , with Turkes a Turke , and so with any may be of any Religion . Vpon this ground sprung Atheisme , which acknowledges neither any God , nor any religion ; Paganisme which worships many Gods , and is of any Religion ; Samaritans who made a religion mixt of Iewes & Gentills ; Turcisme which obserues a Religion mixt of Iewes , Gentills , and Christians ; Libertines in S. Augustines tyme who made no important difference betweene the Religion of Catholikes and Donatists : and many both Libertins and Politicians in this tyme , who admit saluation in any Religion and profession , and thereby inferre , and practise a contempt of all piety , and religion , a liberty of all sinne and dissolution of life , and a carelesnesse of heauen , & all heauenly cogitations . All which as fruit of one tree , do by necessary sequell follow out of this doctrine of predestination which the priuate spirit inuented , Caluin diuulged , Machiauell confirmed , and the Diuell by all liberty of sinne , and rebellion hath increased and propagated . The second absurdity , which is of men made desperate by this doctrine , which is the mother of desperation , is this reason and consequence by which they infer thus : I am either predestinate , or reprobate ; if predestinate it auails nothing to liue wel or ill , because necessarily I shal be saued ; if reprobate it auailes as litle to liue well or ill , because certainly I must be damned : necessarily therefore liue I well or ill , I must be saued or damned . VVhat therefore need I care or do , but enioy my lust , and liberty , sith neither good life can hinder hell , or help to heauen if I be reprobate ; nor bad life hinder heauen or further hell , if I be elect : if therefore I be reprobate necessarily shall I be damned , what hope therefore can I haue of saluation ? Thus out of this ground did a Religious man of S. Augustines Monastery in his tyme reason , & by the force therof foorsooke his Cloister , returned to the world , liued wickedly , and dyed desperatly . Out of the same motiue did Lewis a Lands-graue in Caesarius tyme liue wickedly , and reason thus desperatly : If I be predestinate , no sinnes can barre me of Heauen ; if reprobate , no good workes can help me to heauen ; if I be appointed at a certaine day to dy , I can neither by good life make longer my life , nor by bad life preuent my death . And he was in danger to haue dyed thus , if a wise Phisitian had not in his sicknesse by this reason cured his soule : If your day be come , certainly you must dye , if not , you need not my help . Vpon which the Landsgraue yet pressing him for help of phisicke , he further inferred : If you can preserue your life by phisicke , though your day be appointed , why can you not saue your soule by Contrition , though your end be predestinate ? By which reason the Landsgraue saw his errour , and was brought to Contrition , and confession , and that perhaps with better successe then if he had answered as a Diuine might , and should , thus : That if you be predestinate to saluation by meanes appointed by God , then certainly you shall be saued if you vse and apply those meanes , as by Gods grace you may ; and if you be reprobate , and appointed to be damned it is for your sins freely committed , & then certainly you shal be damned if you commit these sinnes which you may auoid if you will. By which solution as a iust man cannot presume ; so a sinner needes not despaire , but both , with fe●re and trembling ought to worke their saluation , howsoeuer by God they be predestinate . Thirdly , It followes , because a man is thus by the decree , and hand of God necessitated to do what God hath by his immutable , and ineuitable will determined and appointed ; that he h●th no freedome of will ; freedome , I say , not of grace as iust , by which he is freed from the seruitude of all sin , nor of glory , as blessed , by which he is freed from the miseries of this life , both which are in the next , not in this life : but no freedome of nature , by which his wil hauing al things prerequired to do , may yet freely do , or not do . No freedome either in things naturall , as to speake , or to be silent , to walke or stand : or in things morall , as to giue or not giue almes ; or in things supernaturall as by grace to loue God , or not loue him , to sinne or not sinne against God. No freedome either of contradictiō , or quoad exercitium , by which he may do or not do any action , as to moue , or not moue : or of contrariety , and quoad specificationem , by which he may prosecute any obiect good , as to loue his neighbour ; or bad , as to hate him . It followes , I say , that a man hath no freedome or liberty either of contradiction , or of contrariety , either in things naturall morall , or supernaturall . And as man hath no freewill at all in any action ( which both followes from their positions and they grant ; ) so it followes , that in vaine is all labour in man , either to exercise vertue , or to auoide vice . In vaine is all penance or mortification to bridle his concupiscence , or passion . In vaine are all exhortations to piety , and deuotion , and all disswasions from sinne and iniquity , because man hath no freedome of will , nor power & ability to do either the one or the other , or the one , rather then the other : but all necessarily must be done as God hath appointed , and doth worke it . It followes , that no lawes or precepts of God or man to bid or forbid , can be iust . No tribunals of Princes or Prelates to punish offenders , and reward well-doers , can be vpright ; because they are imposed on them who haue no liberty to do , or not do them ; and leaue neither possibility nor obligation to be performed by man. It followes that there can be no vertue in doing well , or vice in doing ill , no iust iugment in rewarding of good , or in punishing of bad , no crowne of glory in heauen for iust actions , or torment of paine in hell for vniust ; because in man is no indifferency , liberty , or freedome to do the one rather then the other ; but is necessitated by the will of God to do that to which he is ordeined . It followes , that no contracts of marriage , which require a free consent without feare or force , can be valid . No temptation to sinne , against which is no power or liberty , can be auoided . No lawes against malefactours for any crimes , because they are not in their power not to do them , can be executed . That no difference remaines betweene a man and a beast , for where is no free election there is no will , where is no will there is no reason , where no reason , there is no difference betweene a man & a beast ; why therfore are sins prohibited , lawes established , sermons preached more to men then to beasts , sith men haue no more liberty to do or not do , to obey or not obey them , then beasts ? Why are actions of lust , killing , and murdering punished in men , not in beasts , sith men haue no more freedome to absteine from them , then beasts ? Why is man rather commanded to absteine from concupiscence , then the fier is from burning ? Why more from swearing then the sunne frō shining ? Why more from lying and stealing then the sea from ebbing and flowing ? Why is he commanded to loue God aboue all more then to touch heauen with his fingar ; to keepe the sabboth from working , more then to keepe his yeares from increasing ? Why not to sinne rather then not to be sicke , sith to the one he hath no more power , or ability , liberty , or freedome , then to the other ? Which doctrine how high it blocketh vp the way to all vertue , and piety , and how wide it openeth the gappe to all vice , and liberty shall after be shewed . How contrary it is to al authority of holy scripture , how iniurious to God , & preiudicious to man I leaue to be seen in other authours ; how forcible the cōmon consent of all sortes of people is against it , S. Austine shal witnesse , who sayes that the sheepheards in the mountaines , the Poets on the stages , the people in the market , the learned in the libraries , the maisters in the schooles , the Prelates in the pulpits , and all mankind in the whole world do blase out the freedome of mans will , which is so certaine that , saith he , if there be sinne there must be freedome , because sinne is so voluntary , as that it is no sinne if it be not voluntary . How euidently , euen by common sense , and experience , it is to be proued , I will referre him who will deny it , to Scotus his sensible demonstration , who with blowes not reasons , with cudgels not arguments would haue it proued to him till he confesse he hath liberty , and freedome to cease from beating him . And how little credit is to be giuen to the teachers of this doctrine in other high pointes of faith aboue reason , who so grosly faile in this so manifest both to reason , and sense , I will referre to the iudgment of the indifferent reader : and so passe from the absurdities of this Protestant Predestination touching man , to the same as they concerne God , and his goodnes . SVBDIV. 2. Protestant doctrine of Predestination , makes God the authour of sinne . HOW iniurious , & blasphemous this doctrine of Gods absolute Predestination to sinne , and damnation , is to God , and how much it doth derogate from his nature , goodnesse , and iustice shall by these ensuing sequels , and absurdities appeare , in that it makes God , 1. The authour of sinne . 2. Sinfull . 3. Only sinfull , 4. A lying and dissembling sinner . 5. A most cruell tyrant . 6. Not a God , but the very diuel himselfe . All which shal appeare as euidently deduced out of the former doctrine : so that if it be true , which many of them teach , that , as we belieue scripture , so we must belieue consequences euidently deduced out of it , both as points of faith ; so in like manner as they belieue the former doctrine of Gods absolute and irrespectiue decree of mans Predestination to damnation , and sinne ; they must also belieue these consequences euidently deduced out of the same : first . That God is made by this doctrine the authour of sinne , and , not only as the Manichees made him a bad God , the authour of bad ; nor as Florimus did make him the good God , the authour of a bad substance : but as Simon Magus did make him the authour of al bad actions and wicked works , is proued . 1. Because God , according to the defenders of this doctrine , doth by his absolut and irresp●ctiue ( as M. Montague calles it ) Will , predestinate men to eternall damnation . 2. Because God by a secret motion doth compell and necessitate the same men to all sinnes that therby he may haue an occassion to condemne , and punish them . 3. Because God doth commaunde , vrge , & incite the diuell to tempt , and induce them to sinne . 4. Because that therfore God is the authour of all sinnes which are by these men commited . 5. Because God not content with this cruelty doth diuers wayes delude men in shew , exteriourly calling , and offering his grace ; but interiourly denying , and detaining them from grace . 6. Because God for that end to damne them depriues them of freewill that they cannot repent , and of all benefits of the merits of Christ , and of grace , that they can haue no meanes to be saued . 7. Because God neuer frees them from originall sinne , into which he had cast them ; but leaues it in them to corrupt al their actions , & make them sinfull . 8. Because God for these sinnes made them vnable to keepe any the least commandement . 9. Because from these sinnes God neuer frees them , but only couers the sinne , imputes the person iust , and so saues all the elect . All which reasons are positions in expresse words affirmed , especially by Caluin ( cited at large by Becanus ) by Luther , Melancthon , Sanctius , Martyr , Beza , VVhitaker , Perkins , and other prime Protestants , cited in their owne words by Doctour Smith , and are confessed by Doctour Montague , in his appeale to Caesar , and condemned by Lutherans , as well as Catholicks . Out of which doctrine it followes , 1. That those actions which we esteeme sinnes , as idolatry , periury , adultery , murder , theft ▪ pride , malice , and the rest , are no offences against God , because he wils , commands , and works them himselfe . 2. That they are no sinnes , because sinne is against the will and law of God , but these are according to the will , decree , and commandement of God , which is the rule according to which all actions are to be squared . 3. That sinne is nothing but , as the Libertins confuted by Caluin do hould , an opinion of men , because it is not contrary , but conformable to the will , decree , and commandement of God. 4. That God in words forbidding sinne , and these actions as sinne , doth either dissemble , as inwardly willing and working that which exteriourly he prohibits , or els is contrary to himsele , as willing , and not willing the same sinnes . 5. That if there be any sins at all , then God who is the principall authour , & agent , and not man who is the instrumēt only , is the sinner & offender . 6. That men are excusable in committing any or all the foresayd actions , because they do that which God wils & works , and which themselues cannot but worke . 7. That no credit can be giuen to the word of God in Scripture , because God may as well lye in it , as he doth in other bookes of Pagans or Heretikes , of both which he is equally the principal authour and dictatour . All which absurdities as they are most horrible and blasphemous , so do they all necessarily follow vpon the former Protestant positions , and must needs be true , if the former Protestant doctrine , and positions be true . SVBDIV. 3. Protestant doctrine of Predestination , makes God a sinner . SECONDLY , that God is by this doctrine not only the authour of sinne , but a very sinner , and worker , not only of the materiall entity , or action by which sinne is cōmitted , but also of the formall malice , or defect of goodnesse in which sinne consisteth , and so is formally a sinner , and committer of sinne according to this doctrine , is proued . 1. Because the teachers of this doctrine , as before , call God the principall authour , actour , and the worker of sinne : but as sinne is ( in like manner as a picture ) a denominate concreet , including the malice as the forme , and the action as the matter of sinne , as the picture doth the forme of a man , and the matter of colours of which it is made ; so he that affirms God to be the author or worker of sinne , doth as properly affirme him to be the authour of the malice in sinne , as the painter is sayd to be the authour & worker of the forme of the picture : and so God is as properly a sinner , by being the authour and worker of sinne , as the workmā is a painter by being the authour , and worker of the picture . And though in the Catholike doctrine God is no more a sinner in that he is in somesort the efficient cause of the reall entity of the sinnefull action ( to which as the authour of Nature , he concurs with man as an vniuersall and indifferent agent to any action ) then the soule is the authour of the lamenesse in the legge , or the writer the cause of the ill writing of the penne ( the defect o● formality of sinne proceeding from the particular agent , man , who is the deficient cause , as the formall lamenesse , or ill writing proceeds from the legge , & penne , in whome is the defect of lamenesse , or writing : ) Yet in the Protestant doctrine ( which makes God the authour of sinne formally as sinne , thereby to shew his iustice in punishing sinne as sinne , and sinnefull men for sinne ) it cannot be auoided but that God is a sinner , as the authour of sinne , and that formally as sinne : and if it would excuse God from being a sinner in that he wills , and workes sinne for a good end to shew his iustice , then it would also excuse man from sinne in that he sinned for a good end , as if he stole to giue almes , or kild a man to send him to heauen , by which reason euill might be committed that good might come thereupon , which is contrary to S. Paul. Secondly , because the same teachers make God the principall willer , commander , and worker of sinne , who , that he may iustly punish men for sinne , ( whome he hath vpon his owne meere will , without any preuision of their sinne , ordained , and created to be punished , and damned ) doth therefore ordaine , will , command , & worke sinne , & doth force , & necessitate them to sinne , that for the same sinne he may execute his decree of damnation vpon them : but whosoeuer is the principal willer , commander , and worker of sinne must needes be a sinner , and more properly a sinner thē the instrument which is vsed , or the subiect in which the sinne is committed , that is , man. Therefore God must be a sinner , properly a sinner , and more properly a sinner then man , yea and the greatest sinner of all sinners , as the chiefe willer , commander , and worker of all sinnes : which is a horrible blasphemy . SVBDIV. 4. Protestant doctrine of Predestination , makes God the only sinner , THIRDLY , that God is by this doctrine not only a sinner , but also the only sinner , and that the Diuell , & Man are innocent , and no sinners at all , is proued . Because if the Diuell in tempting to sin be ruled by the will of God , to whose command he obeyes ; If in alluring to sinne , he be cōpelled to obey , and do what God doth compell him to do ; And if the wicked who sinne are not excusable in that they cannot auoid the necessity of sinning , which by the ordination of God is imposed vpon them , as Caluin affirmes ; If Iudas did necessarily betray Christ , and Herod & Pilate did necessarily condemne him , as Beza affirms ; If the thiefe be compelled to steale by the compulsion of God that for the theft he may be hanged , as Zuinglius affirmes : then surely is not the thiefe who is compelled , but God who cōpels both the Diuell to set on the thiefe , and the thiefe who steales , the sinner who sinnes . For if the goodnesse and badnesse of the worke in euery action is to be attributed to the principall authour , willer , and worker of it , not to the instrument ( especially such as want freewill ) vsed in working it , as the well building of the house is to the architect , not to the axe and tooles ; then is the malice of sinne to be imputed to God the principal and chiefe authour , not to man , only the enforced instrument of it , and so only God is the sinner , and man innocent , and no sinner at all . Which is also confirmed out of that saying of S. Augustine , that sinne is so voluntary , that except it be voluntary it is not sinne : but it is voluntary only in God , according to these teachers , not in man , in whom it is necessary , therefore it is a sinne only in God , not in man. SVBDIV. 5. Protestant doctrine of Predestination , makes God alyer and dissembler . FOVRTLY , That God is , by this doctrine of these Doctours , a great lyer , and a deepe dissembler , and deluder , that is , that either God , or these Doctours must be lyers , or dissemblers ; is proued : Because the words of God in holy scripture , & of these Protestant doctours in this point are contradictory ; therfore if Gods word be true , theirs must be false , or if theirs be true , then must Gods be false , and so God must be either a lier in speaking vntruly in scripture , or a dissembler in speaking one thing & intending another , or they strang lyers in belying him . That Gods word & theirs are contradictory is apparent by these instances . First , God saies , that (a) he wils not inquity , that (b) he hateth iniquity , that (c) he hateth sinnes , that (d) both the wicked and his wickednesse is hatefull to him , that (e) Salomon did that which was not liked before our Lord , that (f) Dauid did displease him , the one for his idolatry , the other for numbring the people : but these Protestant Doctours say the contrary : Caluin sayes , that (g) God wils and is authour of sinne ; (h) willed the sinne of Adam , and fall of man ; that (i) Pharao's cruelty pleased God Beza sayes , that (k) God wils and decrees euill and the damnation of man ; that (l) God wils and is pleased with that , which he doth reuenge , and punish . Peter Martyr sayes , that (m) God wils sinne , as a meane to his end , hates not sinne which he workes . Perkins sayes , that (n) God willed the sinne and fall of Adam , wils that sinne be committed . Bucanā sayes , that (o) God wills sinne by his secret , and well-pleasing will ▪ All which if they be true , then the former sayings of God are false , and so God lyes , or dissembles , of if Gods be true , theirs are false . Secondly , God sayth , (p) that he hath not done iniquity ; that (q) he will not do iniquity ; that (r) they erre that worke euill ; that (s) he who commits sinne is of the Diuell ; that (t) he commaunds none to do wickedly ; that (u) he did not command the building of the high place of Balaam ; that (x) he doth not tempt any man to euill ; (y) Suffers none to be tempted aboue that which he is able . But contrary to all this Caluin sayes ; that (z) God not only permits , but commaunds euill , commands and compells the Diuell to be a lying spirit in the mouth of Prophets ; (a) workes the execration of the faithlesse ; (b) Is the cause of obduration ; (c) of Pharao's obduration and cruelty ; that (d) wickednesse committed by man proceeds from God ▪ Luther sayes , that (e) God workes in vs good and euill , and works euill by vs. Melancthon sayes , that (f) the treason of Iudas was as proper a worke of God , as the conuersion of S. Paul Beza sayth , that (g) God doth worke in vs obduration , and is the cause of it . Sāctius sayes , that (h) God is the chiefe authour of obduration , doth worke good and euill in vs ; (i) doth reward his owne good , & punish his owne ill workes in vs ; that (k) sinne as sinne , and malum culpae , is preordained of God ; that (l) God ordained men to damnation , and their sinnes to damne them , forsooke them and denyed them grace that they might sinne ; (m) compelleth to wickednesse mediatly by himself , and by his speciall action . Peter Martyr sayes , that (n) God doth solicite to deceaue ; (o) doth compell to great sinnes , to lye , to seduce . All which if they be true , then the former sayings of God in Scripture are false , and so God is a lyer , a deluder , or a dissembler , or they foule lyers . Thirdly , God sayth in Scripture , that (p) he wils not the death of the wicked ; that (q) he will not haue any to perish ; that (r) it is not his will , that one of these litle ones perish ; (s) but will haue all to be saued , and come to the knowledge of the truth . He commaunds that (t) none shall worship strang Gods , that none commit murder , adultery , and theft ; (u) he persuades the wicked to repent , to be conuerted , and repent from their iniquity , and to sinne no more ; (x) he inuiteth , calleth , and stretcheth out his hands ; and ( y ) would gather sinners vnder his winges , as a Henne doth her chickins ; (z) he would haue all to come to him . But Caluin sayes that (a) God did ordaine , and predestinate many , yea the most to damnation , and created them for that end , for no desert or sinne in them , but only for that his will was so to haue it ; (b) did create them as organs of his anger to destruction of death , and that they might come to that end , did either depriue them of power to heare the word of God , or did blind and dull them in hearing it , doth direct his voice to them not to that end that they may heare ▪ but to that end that they may be made more stupid ; that (c) he calls them only by word , and after a humane manner , not because he would haue them come . Beza sayes , (d) (d) he will not haue the reprobate conuerted and saued , who are not able to haue any will to be conuerted . Piscator sayes , (e) he maks shew in words to will that which he wils not , and not to will that which he wil , & so doth he vse holy dissembling . Beza sayes , (f) he commandes that which he will not haue done , and promiseth that which he will not performe ; that (g) he doth not loue all ; (h) neuer did , nor euer will haue mercy on all ; that (i) he would not haue the death of Christ to profit the reprobate ; (k) will not haue the reprobate conuerted and saued , and that they cannot haue any will to be conuerted . Zanctius sayes , (l) He calls all according to his outward will , and preaching of the Ghospell , but according to his secret will , neither would , nor will haue all to come , and be saued . Perkins sayes , (m) he will not , nor hath so much as any will or velleity , no not conditionally , that all be saued . And therefore it is not true to say , that God will haue all saued . And that when S. Paul sayth so , he speaketh according to the charitable opinion of men , not according to Gods will. All which wordes of these Protestant Doctours , as they contradict the wordes of God ( for that God doth not will , command , and worke euill ; and that he doth will , worke , and compell to euill ; that God hates , & is displeased with sinne , iniquity , and sinfull persons ; and that he wils , decrees , and ordaines the same ; that God inuites , calles , desires , & wils the saluation of all ; and that he detaines , and withouldes men from coming to be saued , are quite opposite and contradictory one to another ; ) so therefore must either this Protestāt doctrine be false if Gods be true , or if theirs be true , Gods must be false , and God either a lyer , or a dissembler . He that desires to see more of these expresse contradictions betweene the expresse word of God in holy Scripture , and the Protestant Doctours in their writinges , let him peruse the foresaid Collation , where he shall find at large Gods expresse wordes , that God wills not iniquity , their expresse wordes , that God wills iniquity ; Gods words , that God doth not worke iniquity , their wordes , that God doth worke iniquity ; Gods words , that he doth not cōmand man to sinne ; their words , that God doth command a man to sinne ; Gods words , that God doth not tempt to euill ; their wordes ▪ that he doth tempt to euill ; Gods wordes , that God doth hate all who worke iniquity , and their wordes , that he d●t● no● ha●e them ; Gods wordes , that he doth not ●ustify a wicked man remaining wicked ; their wordes , that he doth iustify such a one ; Gods word , that he is angry with the faythfull when they sinne ; their word , that he is not angry with them ; Gods word , th●t God is delighted with good workes ; their wordes , that he is not delighted with good workes ; Gods words , that God is worshipped with good works ; their wordes , that he is not worshipped with them ; Gods wordes , that God is pacifyed , & pleased with good workes ; their wordes , that he is not pacifyed , nor pleased with them ; Gods words , that God will haue his Commandments kept ; their wordes , that he will not haue them kept ; Gods words , that God will haue mercy vpon all men ; their wordes , that he will not haue mercy on all men ; Gods wordes , that God doth loue all men ; their wordes , that he doth not loue all men ; Gods words , that he will haue all men to be saued ; their wordes ▪ that he will not haue all men to be saued ; Gods wordes , that God wills not the death of a sinner ; their words , that God wils the death of a sinner ; Gods wordes , that God made not death ; their wordes , that he made death ; Gods wordes , that God hath no need of sinners ; their wordes , that God hath need of sinners ; Gods wordes , that God damnes men for their sinnes ; their wordes , that he doth not damne them for their sinnes ; Gods wordes , that God can do all thinges ; their wordes , that God cannot do all thinges . All which contradictions being in the forecited booke , & place expressed in the wordes of God in Scripture , & in the wordes of the authours themselues out of their owne writings , and that only in one article , concerning God ( to omit many other such like contradictions concerning Christ , Scripture , Church , Sacraments , Fayth , good Workes in generall and , particuler , Sinnes , Iustification , Free-will , the Commandements , Heauen , Hell , and others in particuler to the nūber of 250. in the same authour expressed in the wordes of Scripture and the Protestant authours themselues ) do euidently conuince that in most points of controuersies expresse Scripture is against them ( of which also some particuler instances are giuen in the former part of this Treatise ) and that they doe make God , who is truth it selfe , a false , lying , or dissembling God in his holy word , & holy Scripture which they would seeme so much to esteeme , and honour . SVBDIV. 6 Protestant Doctrine of Predestination , makes God a most cruell Tyrant . THAT this Protestant doctrine doth make God cruel , most cruell , and more cruell then any Tyrant in this world , shall by these their positions , and doctrine , before proued , appeare . 1. In that they affirme God to haue imposed vpon man lawes impossible by him to be performed , as the ten Commandements ; and for the breach of them to haue inflicted paines intollerable , as hell-fier . 2. In that they affirme , God to haue ordeined , appointed , and created , & that vpon his owne meere will , and pleasure , without any demerit so much as in them foreseene the greater part of mankind to be damned for euer in the torments of hell . 3. In that he hath taken from these men freedome of will , and ordained , decreed , forced , and necessitated these men to sinne , that for this si●ne he might damne them , and for the same hath damned , and doth still damne many . By which doctrine is taken away from God his chiefest attribute of mercy which is aboue all his workes , and is attributed to him the chiefest property of the Diuell , which is extreme cruelty . For first , if God do make lawes which are impossible to be kept , and inflict punishment which is intollerable to be endured for the breach of them ; then are Gods lawes more seuere then were the laws of Draco the Athenian , who made lawes so cruell , that he inflicted death equally vpon all offences as well lesse as greater , as well for taking a bunch of grapes , as for stealing a great treasure , as well vpon those who were only idle , as vpon those who were murderous , because , sayd he , the least offence deserued death , & a great offence could not haue a greater punishment then death ; for which Demades sayd , such lawes were to be writ not with inke , but with bloud ; and Solon did after seauenteene yeares abrogate them all , and made new : but according to this doctrine Gods lawes inflict a death not temporall but eternall , and paines not for an hower but for euer , as well for euery idle word as for an horrible murder , as well for stealing a penny as a thousand pounds , as well for an vnuoluntary suggestion to sinne ; as a voluntary consent , act , or custome of sinne ▪ and which is more , for not doing that which was impossible for them to do , or for committing that which God himselfe forced them to commit . Memorable are the tyrannies of the Herods in holy Scripture . Of Herod the King , who to kill one most innocēt , kild all the innocent children about (a) Bethleem . Of Herod the Tetrarch , who to please a dancing Wench , cut off the head of a holy S. Iohn Baptist . And of Herod ●grippa , who to please the people kild S. Iames , & would haue kild S. Peter if the Angell had not freed him out of prison . Memorable are the crueltyes of Adonibezec , who cut off the fingars and toes of 70. Kinges , and fed them with scraps vnder his table . Of Abimelec , who kild vpon one stone the seauenty sonnes of Ieroboall . Of Amman , who would haue kild all the Iewes in all the kingdome of assuerus in one day . Memorable were the cruelties of Hannibal , who of dead bodies of the Romans made a bridge ; and of his wife , who said that a Ditch full of bloud was a gratefull spectacle . Of Mythridates , who with one letter caused foure score thousand Roman Merchants to be kild at one tyme in Asia . Of the Hetrurians , who tyed the bodies of the liuing Romans to the dead , that the one might dye by corruptiō of the other . Of Atrius , who kild , cut in peeces , boiled , and set before his brother Thyestas his owne children to eate . Of Ptolomy of Aegypt , who kild his owne sonne Memphis borne of his owne sister and wife , Cleopatra , and sent the head , handes , and feet to his mother for a present . Of the Emperour Ner● , who set Rome on fire , desired to see all the world on the like fire , and wished that all the Cittizens had but one head , that he might cut it off at one blow . Of Caligula , who held that it was lawfull for him to do what he list with any man. Of Tiberius , who kild the most of the Senatours of Rome , and left Caligula his successour , because he hoped he would kill the rest , and exceed him in cruelty . Memorable were the tyrannies of Phalaris of Aegrigentum , who tormented men in a fiery bull . Of Diomedes of Thrace , and of Busciris of Aegypt , who gaue their guests to be deuoured by their horses , & fed them commonly with mans flesh . Of Dionysius of Syracusa , of Anno of Carthage , of Eliarcus of Heraclea , of Hyparchus of Athens , all who deuised torments the more cruelly to kill their subiects ; and of the persecuting Emperours , who sought all new deuises of tormenting by racke , wheels , renting , brusing , and by lingring death , the more cruelly to execute the bodyes of the innocent Christians . Wherupon the Philosophers sayd , Cruelty is hatefull to God , a monster of madnesse and misery ; that cruelty , and equity cannot be ioyned togeather ; that cruelty is a wickednesse not humane , but bestiall , and which cannot stand with equity . But of all crueltyes the most memorable , yea horrible , and not imaginable , if the Diuell himselfe had not inuented and deuised it , is this cruelty which they impose vpon God , who is a God so good , so clement , so pittifull , and so mercifull , that (a) his mercy is aboue all his works , and (b) from generation to generation ; that he disposes all things in mercy , and doth with good thinges fill the earth , that he shou●d not only impose lawes vpon man aboue his ability , (c) & for the breaking of these laws should inflict hell-paines , but also that he should will , (d) ordaine , decree , predestinate , yea and create , and that certainly , ineuitably , and immutably , as the prime and principal cause , only because it was his m●ere will and pleasure , the greatest parte of mankind , that is , al who are damned to eternal death , destruction , and damnation in those intollerable paines of hell-fier for all eternity . And that he did will , command , worke , yea and compell and necessitate man to sinne , that for this sinne he might punish and damne him eternally in hell . This certainly is such a cruelty , that if it were true , it would follow that this good God was more cruell then the former tyrants euer were ; for they put men to a temporall death , God to an eternal . They kild men whom they found in their kingdome , God created and made men that he might damne them eternally . They puld downe them whom they had exalted , God exalted these to his liknesse for that end that he might cast them downe to the deepest hell . They murdered a few ōly of their subiects , God the greatest part of the world . They kild them , against whome they conceiued displeasure , or such as had offended them ; God damnes thē who haue no way offended him , or sinned , yea whom he forces to sinne , that for that sinne he may damne them . They punished with great punishment small offences , God with eternall punishment no offences . They punished with death men who did otherwise , one way or other , both deserue death and must dy ; God damnes them who otherwise then for his will and pleasure were not to be damned : as much therfore as the number is greater , the punishment more grieuous , and the cause of their damnation lesse ; so much is God by these doctours made more cruel , and tyrannicall then any of the former tyrants . If it were a horrible cruelty for a King to call thousands of his subiects out of the Country to the Court , and there to grace , and giue them dignity , only for that end , that , when he had thus graced them , he might presently , without any fault committed by them , torture , torment , and with all cruelty by his owne hands murder , and butcher them alone after another ; then surely a greater cruelty it is in God to create , and bring out of nothing so many millions of soules as are , or shal be in hell tormented , & to exalte them to the dignity of his owne liknesse , in memory , will , and vnderstanding , and to enrich them with so many benefits of nature , & grace , only for that end that without any desert , or offence in them , he may in those intollerable flames eternally himselfe torment them ; yea to cause , compell , and force them to commit such acts of sinne , that for the same he may thus punish and damne them . Surely this is a cruelty ●nd tyranny so great , that a greater cannot be conceiued to be in the diuell , nor yet be imagined by the diuell himselfe : and yet these Protestant doctours do not only impute it vnto God , but wil haue it to be a property of God , and to stand with his mercy . Indeed if to make lawes not impossible to be performed , if to oblige men to do thinges impossible to be done , if to command men to do a worke , and then to deny them meanes to do it , if to command and will men , yea to force and compel them , to do some action , and then to punish them for doing the same , and that with such horrible paines as of hell : If this I say , be mercy and mildnesse , be grace and goodnes , then what can be seuerity , iniustice , cruelty , and tyranny ? If this be Gods mercy , pitty , clemency , longanimity , grace and goodnes to man ; what is his iustice , and seuerity ? what is , or can be cruelty , and tyranny ? If these be his wayes of mercy , what are his wayes of iustice ? If to punish cura condignum , and to reward vltra condignum , that is , to punish lesse and reward more then is deserued , be a property of mercy , which all attribut to God ; then to punish without desert , yea to cause and force a man to do euill , and then to punish him for it , is surely no mercy ; yea no iustice , but vnspeakable cruelty , and intollerable iniustice . Surely if this may be accounted mercy , it is a mercy which is mercilesse , a mercy which brings all misery , and makes millions most miserable . A mercy which makes mercy ste● more then seuere iustice , mercy & most extreme iniustice ; mercy and most inhumane cruelty , all one ; for what greater iniustice , and cruelty can there be in a tyrant , or a diuell then to choose , and picke out so many millions of soules , and without any cause giuen by them , to ordaine , appoint , and put them into eternall paines of hell-fire , there to fry for all eternity , and to debarre them of all meanes , or ability either of the merits of Christ , or of freedome in themselues , or of any other helpes , or meanes whatsoeuer to auoid the same , so that vpon necessity they must sinne , and deserue damnation , & vpon necessity must for that sinne be dāned ? O mercilesse mercy ! O vniust iustice ! nay , O cruell cruelty of all cruelties , the gre●test that cruelty it selfe could conceiue , or the Diuel himself can either deuise or execute . Far be it from thee , O God of mercy , who works all in mercy , and whose mercy is aboue all thy works . SVBDIV. 7. Protestant doctrine of Predestination , makes God a Diuell . LASTLY that this Protestant doctrine doth transforme God into a Diuell , and so doth depriue him of his only , and all goodnes , and therby transpose him into the greatest and vilest euill that can be , shall by these ensuing reasons appeare . 1. It is the office or property of Satan to ●empt man to sinne , yea as an aduersary to lay traps to ensnare man in sinne , for which in greeke he is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , a tempter , or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , an entrapper or calumniator , and in hebrew Sathan , an aduersary , and so he is called (a) tempter , is said to (b) tempt vs , and to temp the hart to lye to the holy ghost (c) . But this is more proper to God according to this Protestant doctrine , then to the Diuell . 1. Because God doth not only tempt and moue a man to sinne , but which is more , doth will , ordaine , and predestinate a man to sinne , and to al the sinnes which are committed . 2. Because God is not only our aduersary to oppose vs ; but so potently doth oppose vs in so weighty a matter as our greatest good , that he directly excludes most from all felicity , depriues most of all benefit of it , debarres most from all meanes to attaine it , & entraps most in all the snares , which may hinder their progresse vnto it ; & the Diuell is but only his instrument to worke that which he wils , and execute that which he before had designed against vs : therefore God is more our tempter , and aduersary then is the Diuell . Secondly , The office and property of the Diuell is to sow tares , or ill weeds of sinne in the field of our hearts , to choake vp all the corne of grace and goodnes , the enemy comes and sowes tares . But God doth this , according to this doctrine , more then the Diuell . 1. Because God doth worke inwardly in the hearts of sinners , doth excecate and obdurate the minds of men , doth strike them with a spirit of errour , giddinesse , and madnesse , and that not by permission , but operation , as Caluin in particuler affirmes . 2. Because God doth will , command , and worke in vs all the sinnes which are wrought , as the principall cause and mouer , the Diuell being only as the instrument , and that not free , but forced ; not mouing but moued ; and not able to do otherwise then by God he is both commanded , and compelled , as before ; therfore the chiefe and principall sower of ill seeds , and weeds of sinne is God , not the Diuell . Thirdly , The office , and property of the Diuell is to be authour of all sinnes in generall sinne is of the Diuell : and of lying in particuler , who speakes lies of himselfe , and is a lier , the Father of lies . But this is more proper to God then the Diuell according to this doctrine . 1. Because the Diuell did only in Adam , by tempting him to eat the forbidden fruit , remoue an impediment which did hinder ill , to wit originall iustice , by which the inferiour part was kept in order without rebellion to the superiour : but God did by his will , saith Caluin , ordaine and decree the fall of Adam , the ruine of all his posterity , & the miserable condition into which we are all fallen . Therfore God was more properly the authour of Adams fal then the Diuel . 2. Because the Diuell doth only tempt to sinne indirectly & medially , that is , either obiectiuè proposing sinfull obiects to the phantasy , that the will may consent , and delight in them , or dispositiuè by altering & tempering the organs of the senses that the appetites may with more facility incline vnto them , leauing alwayes a freedome of the will to dissent , or assent : but God , according to Caluin , doth not only by his ineuitable , & immutable decree , and ordinance , will and commād the same , but also by his immediate , effectual , & irresistable concourse & operation to euery actiō of sin , so works the act of sinne in man , that he leaues in man neither any operation at all , God working all ; nor any liberty or freedome , God necessitating all , who is thereby not only the permitter , but the authour of all sinnes ; the authour as well of the adultery of Dauid , the treachery of Iudas , the hardnesse of Pharao , the cruelty of Achab , the incest of Absalom , the reproach of Semei , the idolatry of the ten Tribes , of the Chaldean destruction of Iudea , of the Iewes and Pilates condemning of Christ , as he is , of the conuersion of S. Paul. Therefore God is more and truely the immediate worker of sinnes and lyes , then the Diuell . O diabolicall doctrine ! SVBDIV. 8. Obseruations vpon the former doctrine . VPON good ground therefore did Castalio ( who as Caluins scholler best vnderstood his maisters mind , not only by his writinges , but from his owne mouth ) affirme , that this doctrine of Caluin did transfer God into the Diuell , and for the same forsooke both him and Geneua , and writ against him , and this his doctrine . Truely did Peter Vermilius a Professour of Tigure affirme , that this doctrine of Caluins is a libertine , execrable , sacrilegious , abominable , and altogeather diabolicall doctrine . Iustly did the Tigurin Sacramentaries anno 1554 accuse Caluin for this doctrine of great impiety , cause his bookes writ of this subiect to be rent in peeces by the Hangman , and to be burnt publickly in the Market place , & by special Edict , commanded that none should diuulge in their territories any so horrible and detestable opinions . Vpon good reason do as yet the Lutherans in Germany so detest this doctrine , that to cleare Luther of it , they did expunge out of his works these words , God doth worke euill in vs. And most worthily doe the same Lutherans generally disclaime both this doctrine , and Caluin for it , in so much as one of them , Heshusius a great Superintendent , affirmes , that Caluin writ wickedly of the cause of sinne , made God the authour of sinne , and in his doctrine is horribly contumelious against God , pernicious to man , and makes not the Diuell , but God to be the authoisr of lyes . Another of them , a Professour , auouches , that not God , but the Diuell is authour of this predestination , and the God of the Caluinists . Out of which doctrine , and sequels vpon it , may be obserued . 1. That neuer any doctrine of Atheist , Pagan , Iew , or Heretike was so wickedly pernicious , and abominable as this of Caluin , and his followers is ; for though some made God idle , as Epicurus , others impotent , as Lucianus , others the authour of euill , as the Cerdonists , Marcionists , and Manichees ; others miserable , afflicting himselfe , as the Thalmudists , others no God at all , as the Atheists : Yet all these are more tollerable thē these Caluinists ; for it is not so ill to be idle , as to be doing ill ; better to make God do nothing then to make him the worker of all wickednesse . It is more tollerable to make God vnable to do good , then to make him the authour and actour of doing ill ; to make him vnable to requit good , then vniust to punish where is no desert of ill . It is lesse blasphemy to make two Gods , the one authour of good , and the other the authour of euill , then to make one God , and yet to make him the authour and worker of euill , and of all euill ; to call him iust , and yet to make him the punisher of that in others , which he wills , commandes , and workes by himselfe ; to account him mercifull , and yet vpon his meere will , and pleasure without any cause or desert , to ordaine , & create millions of men to eternall torments , and damnation . It was not so great impiety in the Iewes to make God mourn & sorrowfull for the punishment he wrought on Hierusalem , as it is in the Caluinists to make him well pleased with the vnreasonable tormenting of soules in hell , & to make it one of the chiefest attributes of Gods iustice , to appoint men to sinne , and then for that sinne to punish and damne them . It is not so foolish to say with the foole , there is no God at all , as it is to say , God is the Authour and worker of all wickednesse , and yet the punisher , and reuenger of the same ; for they by the light of reason will condemne and auoid thefts , murders , periuries , iniustice as lying in their power to auoid ; but these will , & may by their owne principles practise , and exercise them al , as being by God forced , and necessitated to them , as wanting freedome to auoid them , and as fearing no punishment for them . Though therefore most wicked , yet lesse wicked were the former opinions of Iewes , Heretikes , and Atheists , then these of the Caluinists . Secondly , it may be obserued , that no Caluinist can be certaine , and assured either of any verity of Scripture , or of any article of his Faith , or of any assurance of his saluation by his priuate spirit ; for though he may imagine himselfe to be certaine of the sense of Scripture , of the articles of his fayth , and of the infallibility of his saluation , that they are reuealed from God , yet he may with all according to his principles of fayth , imagine that God who reueales these , may reueale & tell him , which is false ; for as God , according to them , is he who effectually procures the sinner to sin , who as the principall cause vses the sinner as an instrument to commit sinne , who incites , compels , and necessitates the sinner to sinne , & who phisically , and effectually workes , and causes the act of sinne ; so the same God , according to them may procure , and incite the Apostles , and Prophets as his instruments , compel , and necessitate them as the chiefe authour , and worker , and produce in them as the principall agent , lyes and vntruthes , and so may by them in Scripture reueale an vntruth , either of the beliefe of the mysteries of their fayth , or of the certainty of their saluation . What certainty therefore can they haue from God of reuelations they receaue from him , or of any thing suggested by their supposed spirit , as from him ? Againe , God , according to Caluin , hath one will exteriour , another interiour ; doth call exteriourly whome he withouldes interiourly , speakes to them , but to make them more deafe , giues them light but the more to blind them , doth teach them but to make them more dull , doth apply to them a remedy , but not to cure them ; for so are Caluins wordes . If so , then how can any be sure that the calling , the speaking , the light , the doctrine , and the motion of their spirit ( as they suppose of God ) is not rather to detaine then draw them , rather to darken then lighten them , rather to dull them then teach them , rather to increase then cure their diseases ? Surely , if the spirit of God may worke , and doth more ordinarily worke the bad then the good , doth more vsually make shew to call when he intends they shall not come , doth more generally make blind then enlighten , make obdurate , then mollify , make dull , then teach , and wound then cure : And if God do more often intend bad thē good , obduration then illumination , damnation then saluation , of most whome he cals , inuites , and makes shew of intending their good : And if the greatest part of the world be thus by God deluded and deceaued ; then why may not , or rather should not euery Protestant iustly suspect the same of himselfe ? Why may he not rightly feare that God intends one thing by his inward will , and pretends another by his outward will ? that God doth worke errour , and deceit in him , rather then truth , and verity ? That he is a lying spirit , rather then a true in him ? Surely if God hath deceaued more then he hath taught truth , darkened more thē he hath lightned , obdurated more then he hath mollifyed , woūded more then he hath cured , and damned more then he hath saued ; iustly may euery one both suspect and feare , that God may do the like to him , sith no ground , reason , or motiue he hath of the one rather then of the other , and no more assurance of his saluation among the lesser number , then of his damnation with the greate● . Thirdly , it may be obserued , that the God of these Caluinists , and precise Protestants is not the same with the ancient Christians and present Catholikes , but the one doth so farre differ from the other ; that the one of the Caluinists doth , will , decree , and predestinate all sinnes which are committed by men , and so makes man sinne by the will , decree , and predestination of God ; the other of the Catholickes doth will , decree , and predestinate only good works , and all good workes , and so doth make man to doe good workes according to the will of God , and doth suffer him to do euill according to the man his owne will. The one doth command , vrge , and compell Sathan to deuise sinnes , and to sollicite men vnto it : The other doth bind , hould and hinder Sathan that he do not tempt man , and doth ayde , help , and assist man , that he be not by Sathan tempted aboue his power . The one doth himselfe secretly incite , moue , & necessitate man to sinne : the other doth disswade , deterre , and enable man against sinne . The one is the principall authour , worker , and effectour of all sinnes as sinnes , and men only his instruments to do that sinne which he workes by them : The other is no authour , nor instrument , nor worker at all of sinne as sinne , but only the efficient cause of that which is good , leauing man to be the deficient cause of that which is malice and sinne . The one vpon his meere will , because it is his pleasure , without any demerit , or sinne in man , did ordaine , predestinate and create most men to damnation , and ordained and predestinated only some few to saluation : The other created all men to saluation , and had a will and desire that all should attaine to it and be saued , and ordained none to damnation , but vpon his foresight of their sinne by which they would deserue damnation . The one did will , appoint , and decree the sinne of Adam , and of all mankind , for that end only , that in punishing the most for it he might shew his iustice , & in freeing other some few from it , he might shew his mercy : The other did only forsee , permit & suffer the fal of Adam , & the sin of all his posterity , & that for the more illustration . 1. Of his own goodnes , by cōmunicating himself to man. 2. Of his power , by exalting man to be God. 3. Of his mercy , by making himselfe a Redeemer of his enemies . 4. Of his clemency , in suffering all contumelies and iniuries at the hands of his seruants , besides the benefit which redoūds to man by the liberty of his will , and the benefit of Martyrdome , and other sufferings for the honour of God. The one doth doth excecate , obdurate and harden in sinne those whō he hath thus ordained to sinne and damnation , and for that end doth deny to them all freedome of will , all benefit of Christs merits , all help of grace , all meanes of pardon of their sinne , of doing good , and of attaining to saluation : The other doth call , inuite , and draw men out of sinne , doth stretch out his hands , knocke at the dore of their harts , offer the benefit of Christs merits , the light of his fayth , the vertue of his grace sufficient , and the reward of his glory aboundāt to all , that they may be conuerted , come to him , & saue their soules . The one , not only creates man to sinne and workes in sinne , but also leaues him in sinne both original and actuall , of which he neuer washes and cures the soules of any , euen the iust , by infusion of any grace , but only couers their sinne with the iustice of Christ , and so leauing him sinnefull and corrupted , only imputes him for iust and accounts him as cleane : The other is so farre from causing him to sinne , that he washes , cures , and sanctifyes him from sinne infuses into him grace & sanctity , by which he is really cleane from sinne , may actually obserue Gods commaūdments , & fruitfully do good workes meritorious of life euerlasting . Lastly , the one is the authour and worker of all sinnes , is the only sinner , is a most cruell sinner , and a deluding sinner , yea is one who hath all the bad properties and qualities of the Diuell , and so is the Diuell himselfe : The other is good , all good , only good , and goodnesse it selfe , pittifull , mercifull , gracious and bountifull to all , calling all , seeking all , and drawing al from vice to vertue , from sinne to grace , from the by-path of hell and damnation , to the hye-way of heauen and saluation , as much as in him lyes . As great therefore as is the difference betweene these two Gods , so much different is the God of the Caluinists from the God of the Catholikes , and the religion of the Protestants short of the Religion of the Catholikes . Of which who will see more , may read a Protestāt booke lately set out by a Lutheran , the subiect of which is to proue , that the caluinists God is not the same with the God of the Lutherans , and other Christians . Of absurdities which follow against Fayth , and the Creed . SECT . VI. I Haue at large shewed ( and that more largely then I intended , the fecundity of matter still drawing me on ) that as Idolatry , of God made many Gods , and that these Gods still begat new Gods till the number of Gods was infinit , incredible , and absurd ; so Heresy by one priuate spirit got many priuate spirits , & still euery priuate spirit begat a new opinion , and doctrine , till both the spirits and the doctrine or opinions grew so many and so absurd , that so many horrible and foule absurdities haue issued from them , as neither piety , reason , nor common sense can endure to heare them . One only obseruation ( of which I would desire the readers patience ) and that , to my iudgment , not vnworthy the consideration , occurs ; that is , to compile and bundell vp , as into one view , certaine maine and principal opinions of these Protestants generally receaued ( which indeed are the chief points controuerted betweene vs and them ) and to propose to the eye of euery indifferent Reader how smoothly they plaine the way to the downefall of saluation , by taking away Fayth , Hope , and Charity . For whereas God created man for himselfe , as his end to honour him ; and all thinges for man , as meanes to help him to this end : so he gaue him three helpes or meanes ; one , to know him ; another to desire him ; and a third to attaine him . Man hath the meanes to know God by Fayth , to desire him by Hope , and to attaine him by Charity : those are three Theologicall vertues which haue God their immediate obiect , and are as three meanes to prepare man for his iourney to heauen . Fayth , as the beginning , Hope , as the progresse , Charity , as the end and consummation of iustification : and as three partes of our spirituall building ; Fayth as the foundation ; Hope as the walls ; and Charity as the roofe of our saluation . The Protestant Doctours by their positions , and doctrine do oppugne , and ouerthrow all these three , as in a briefe sūme they are compiled , and proposed to vs ; Fayth , as it is deliuered in the Creed which in twelue articles shewes vs what we are to belieue . Hope , as it is contained in the Pater noster , which in seauen petitiōs directs what we are to hope , and pray for . Charity , as it is comprehended in the Decalogue , which by ten Commandements instructs vs what to do , & what to auoid . In this , and after ensuing Sections therefore we will shew how this doctrine doth oppugne , and ouerthrow all fayth in the articles of the Creed ; al hope in the petitions of the Pater noster ; and all charity in the ten Commandements , and thereby doth prepare the way , and loose the reines to all errour in beliefe , to all despaire or presumption against Hope , and to all liberty of sinnes , and loosenes of life and manners against Charity . And first we will lay downe briefly the chiefe points and positions of the Protestant doctrine , and next , out of them inferre the rest . First , the opinions , and doctrine of the Protestants are these . 1. That (a) only Fayth doth iustify . 2. That (b) this only Fayth makes vs certaine and secure of predestination past , iustification present , and glorification to come . 3. That (c) this Fayth is proper to all the iust , and only to them , and the elect . 4. That (d) this Fayth once had can neuer at any tyme be lost , nor by any sinne be expelled . 5. That (e) no sinnes , how many or great soeuer , be imputed to the elect , but all couered with the iustice of Christ by apprehension of fayth . 6. That (f) this Fayth is obtayned by the priuate spirit in euery man , which assures him of his fayth and saluation . 7. That (g) all workes of all men ▪ euen the iust and best , are sinnes , and that mortall , as infected with originall sinne , and as defectiue from perfect obedience , and fullfilling the precept . 8. That (h) there is no interiour , and inherent grace or iustice , but all exteriour and imputatiue . 9. That (i) the fullfilling of all the Commandements , or any of them is impossible . 10. That (k) no humane lawes do oblige in conscience to their performance . 11. That (l) the Sacraments , chiefly Baptisme are seales and signes of predestination to glory , of remission of sinnes , and perseuerance in Gods fauour ; and that in Baptisme are forgiuen sinnes past , and to come . 12. That (m) man by reason of Gods decree and originall sinne , hath no liberty , or freedome of will to do , or auoid bad workes . 13. That (n) God hath ordained and predestinated vpon his meere will and pleasure , without any cause giuen , or so much as forseene , all who are damned , both to damnation and to sinne . All which positions as they are auerred by the learned Protestants , and preached to the people , so they do ouerthrow all the articles of the Creed , all the petitions of the Pater noster , and all the precepts of the Ten Commandments , and leade to all loosenesse , and dissolution of life , as shal be shewed . SVBDIV. 1. In generall , dectroying all fayth . AND first , that these Positions do quite ouerthrow , & take away all diuine and supernaturall fayth , which is the first foundation and corner-stone of our spirituall building , the first preparation to life and iustification , the first root of all true vertue , and good workes , the first gate by which God enters into our soule , the first light which shines in our vnderstanding , the first true seruice which we offer to God , and the first step by which we beginne to walke our iourney to heauen : that this doctrine doth quite ouerthrow this fayth , and all the articles of the Creed proposed in it , is proued . 1. Because they distinguish three sortes of fayth . 1. Historicall , of thinges reuealed , and related in scripture , and proposed by the Apostles in the Creed , such as are the Trinity , Incarnation , Passion , Resurrection , and Ascension of Christ , with all other articles which all Christians vsually belieue . 2. Generall , of promises in generall , and all graces promised by Christ to all , as the sending of the Holy Ghost , the coming to iudgment , the raysing of the dead , and the like , which are generall for all . 3. Speciall , of the promise made to euery man in particuler of his predestination , iustification , and saluation , by which euery one is made infallibly certaine that his sinnes are forgiuen him , and that he shal be saued . Whereas , I say , they make these three sortes of Fayth , the first and second of these Faithes , to wit , Historicall and Generall ( by which they belieue the articles of the Creed & promises of God in general ) they (a) affirme to be faigned not true fayth , a shadow of Fayth , not a real iustifying faith , a Fayth which is common to the reprobate , and damned , & euen to the Diuels themselues ; and only the third , or Special fayth they assigne to be the true diuine , and supernaturall iustifying fayth , which hath for his obiect the speciall mercy of God , to them in particuler applyed , the certainty of remission of their sinnes assuredly past , and security of their saluation infallibly to come , by which they doe as much or more assuredly belieue their iustification and saluation , then they do the B. Trinity , Incarnation , or the rest of the articles of Fayth . Now , if this speciall fayth be the only true , diuine , supernaturall and sauing fayth , & by it is belieued only one article of the Creed ( & that not truly as shall appeare ) to wit , Remission of sinnes ; and the Historicall and Generall fayth , by which the rest of the articles are belieued , be only a shadow of Fayth , a fayth of the damned , and Diuells : then we haue no diuine , and supernaturall fayth of the rest of the articles , but belieue them only by a Faith which is a fained faith , a shadow , and no more a guift of God , then the fayth of the damned , and the Diuells in hell . Therefore all true ●nd diuine beliefe of the articles of the Creed , is by this special doctrine of speciall Fayth , quite abolished and taken away from all Christians , and nothing but a shadow of Fayth , a fained and diabolicall faith left to them , and so by one position of theirs is cut off all diuine fayth or beliefe of all the articles of the Creed . Secondly , whiles they deny all authority of Tradition , Church , Councels , and Fathers , and will belieue nothing but what they themselues find in Scripture , and that as their priuate spirit interprets it : While they make their spirit , the iudge of all fayth , & all controuersies of fayth , what is to be receaued or reiected , belieued or condemned : While , I say , they doe thus , they may by the vertue of this spirit call in question the authority , and credit of the Creed it selfe , with the authours of it , as not to be found in Scripture , and the particuler articles they may either reiect as counterfeit & intruded , or els expound and interpret them as their spirit shal lead them . Thus Luther and Caluin following Erasmus ( for Erasmus is sayd to haue layd the egge which Luther hatched ; to haue insinuated that which Luther assured ; to haue doubted of that which Luther downe right denyed ) made doubt of the authority of the Creed , whether it was made by the Apostles or not . And the Seruetians in Transiluania ( witnesse Canisius ) admit it but so farre , as it agrees with the word of God , interpreted ( no doubt ) by their spirit . Thus did Beza by his spirit affirme , that part of the sixt article , he descended into hell , to haue been thrust into the Creed . Thus Caluin and Zuinglius following likewise Erasmus , by their spirit affirmed , that part of the tenth article , the Communion of Saints , to haue beene intruded into this Creed out of some other Creed , and not to haue beene found in the ancient Creeds . Thus Luther by his spirit changed in his Germane Creed the word Catholike Church , into Christian Church . And Beza reiected the same word Catholike as most vaine and wicked . And thus by their Glosses , and expositions vpon many articles as not pleasing their tast , they wrest diuers , as shall appeare , from their natiue & proper sense ( for example , he descended into hell , that is , he descended into the graue ) & so make a new Creed in sense , and meaning agreable to their spirit , and the doctrine of it . Of which who will haue a full view , let him read Andr. Iur. his Nullus and Nemo , and Fitzsimons vpon the Masse where their many absurd glosses , and expositions are at large discouered , and confuted . SVBDIV. 2. In particuler , against all the twelue Articles of the Creed . THIRDL , Y because by this doctrine , and these Doctours are oppugned in particuler all the mysteries of fayth in euery article of the Creed , which by this briefe enumeration of euery one shal be made manifest . And first in the first article attributed to S. Peter ( I follow the diuision of S. S. Augustine , and Doctour Kellison , ) is oppugned , 1. The faith and beliefe of all the articles in generall in the word Credo , by all who hould that it is only a shadow , a faigned , & diabolicall Fayth , not a true , diuine , and supernaturall Fayth , tending to iustification by which euery Christian belieues these articles . 2. Is oppugned the vnity of God ( Deum ) by Caluin , who houldes that the Sonne hath an essence distinct from the Father ; By Beza , and Stegius , who hould that the essence is diuided into three persons . 3. By Luther , who houldes that the Diuinity is threefold . 4. By Melancthon , who houldes that there are three Diuinities or essences in God : By Sanctius , who entitles his booke , De tribus Eloim , of three Gods. 5. By the Tritheits in Polonia , who expresly hould there are three Gods , and three Eternalls . 6. Is oppugned the God-head it selfe , and his mercy and goodnesse , 1. By all those who make God the authour , willer , commander and worker of sinne , and damnation , because so is his will and pleasure : Who , make him a sinner , a great sinner , the only sinner : Who make him a lier , a dissembler , a tyrant , and transforme him into a very deuill himselfe ; as is before proued and deduced . 2. By those who make the diuinity of God passible , as with Eutiches the auncient condemned hereticke , Luther , and Iacobus Andreas do . 3. By those who affirme the diuinity to haue beene not only a mediatour betweene God and man , as Caluin and Beza did ; but also to haue beene obediēt to God , as Melancton , and after him many Lutherans , & Tigurins also did . And further to haue exercised the office of a Priest offering sacrifice to God , as Iewell did affirme . All which opinions do make many Diuinities in God , one inferiour to another ; because where one is a mediatour , is obedient , & doth offer sacrifice to another , there must be a subordination , subiection and distinction , there one must be inferiour and distinct from the other , and so there must be many distinct Diuinities , and these inferiour one to another , which is contrary to the nature of diuinity , & God-head . 4. Is oppugned the person of the Father , and with him the whole B. Trinity by Luther , who affirmes that the diuinity is as well three , and of three sorts , as are the three persons ; that the word Trinity is an humane inuention , a word which sounds coldly , and is not to be vsed , but insteed of it the word , God ; and did therupon thrust out of his Letanies that prayer , Holy Trinity one God haue mercy on vs. And did leaue out of his Germane bible those words of S. Iohn ( alleadged by Athanasius , Cyprian , & Fulgentius to proue he blessed Trinity against the Arrians ) There are three which giue testimony in heauen , the father , the word , and the holy ghost , and these three are one . To all which also Caluin subscribes , who not only affirmes , that the prayer , Holy Trinity , one God , haue mercy on vs , doth displease him , as sauouring of barbarisme , but also wrests all those places ( by which the Fathers out of the old and new Testament did proue against Iews , and Arrians , the diuinity of Christ ) to a contrary sense and meaning , as the Lutherās (a) in diuers bookes on set purpose against him haue conuinced . And Danaeus (b) his successor after Beza , followes him , who affirmes that the same word Trinity , and the same prayer , Holy Trinity haue mercy on vs , is a foolish and dangerous prayer . All which are directly contrary to the auncient orthodox , and Catholicke doctrine of the B. Trinity , three persons , and one God. 5. In the same first article is oppugned the omnipotency of God almighty by Beza (a) VVhitaker , & others who affirme , 1. That God cannot place one body in two places by replication or other wayes , that is , Christs body in heauen , and on the altar at the same time . 2. That God cannot place two bodies in one place by penetration one of another , that is , that Christs body , with the stone of the sepulcher at his resurrection , with the dores of the house at the entring to his disciples , and with the solidity of the heauens at his ascensiō , could not be togeather in one place , but the stone , dores , or heauen were diuided , opened , or resolued into some liquid matter . 3. That God cannot draw a camell or a cable-rope , as it is said in the Ghospell , though a needles eye . 4. That God hath no absolute power to do any more then he hath already done . 5. That the position of the archangell Gabriel , Any word is not impossible with God , is not generally to be belieued , nor vniuersally to be admitted . Al which if they be true , that is , if the diuinity be passible , be a mediatour , be a priest , and be three , and distinct as the person are ; if God be the authour and worker of all sinne and euill , if the word Trinity , and the prayer , Holy Trinity haue mercy on vs , be to be left out as barbarous , foolish , and dangerous ; if God cannot place one body in two places , or two bodies in one place , cannot draw a cable-rope through a needles eyes , can do no more then he hath done ; then is the Deity , the vnity , the Trinity , the goodnes and the omnipotēcy of God ( all which are by this first article belieued ) by this doctrine and these Doctours oppugned , and so the Fayth of the first article reiected . Secondly , in the second article attributed to S. Iohn , is oppugned the worke of the whole Trinity , (b) the Creation of heauen and earth , 1. By Caluin , who will haue only the Father properly to be creatour of heauen and earth , as to whome alone the name of God by excellency is due , and the Sonne to be the Vicar of the Father , and to haue the second degree of honour after him . 2. By Stenberge , Seruetus , Blandrata , Somarus , Francus , & others cyted by Kellison , who deny the Diuinity of the holy Ghost , as the third person in the Trinity , and admit only a vertue from the father , which they call the holy Ghost . But if the father be only God , if the sonne be inferiour as his vicar and second to him , if the holy Ghost be only the vertue of the father , not a person distinct from him ; then is only the father , and not the sonne and the holy Ghost with the whole Trinity , the creatour of heauen and earth . Wherby the second article is oppugned . Thirdly , In the third article , attributed to S. Iames the greater is oppugned the diuinity of the sonne & second person , Iesus Christ his only sonne our Lord. 1. By Luther who detested the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , or consubstātiall ( signifying the sonne to be of the same substance with the father ) and made the diuinity of the sonne passible with Eutiches , as I haue shewed before . 2. By Caluin , Beza , and Whitaker , who admit Christ to be sonne of the father , but not to be God of the father , or of the essence of the father , or God of God , as the Nicene Creed expresseth , but God of himselfe , and withall affirmes that the father doth not continually & eternally beget the sonne . 3. By Caluin , Beza , & others before cited who make Christ as God , a mediatour and priest , and both to pray , and to be obedient to the father ; and distinguish in him a person of God distinct from the person of a mediatour , and therby with Nestorius make him to haue two persons . All which if it be true , that is , if the sonne , or second person as God , be not cōsubstantiall with the father ; if he be not God of God ; if he be passible , the vicar and second after the father ; if he be a mediatour and priest obedient to the father ; if he haue two persons : then is he not God coequall and coeternall , and the same in substance with the father , nor one only sonne of God , but two persons . And so this third article , Iesus Christ his only sonne our Lord , is oppugned . Fourthly , In the fourth article , attributed to S. Andrew , is oppugned the humanity of Christ , and virginity of his mother , VVho was conceiued by the holy Ghost , borne of the Virgin Mary . 1. By the Vbiquitarians who make the humanity to haue omnipotency , immensity & all the properties of the deity , & so to do all , to be all where , and in all places , which is proper to a diuine , not humane nature . 2. By the Anabaptists , and others who make Christ to haue passed through the body of his mother , as water doth through a conduct , and not to haue taken flesh of her womb . 3. By Molineus , Bucer , Beza Willet , and others who affirme our B. Lady to haue suffered detriment of her virginity in the birth of our B. Sauiour , and so make Christ not to be borne of a virgin , which this article affirmes . Fiftly , In the fifth article , attributed to S. Philip , is oppugned the vertue of the death and passion of Christ , Who suffered vnder Pontius Pilate , was crucified , dead , and buried . And that many wayes . 1. In that the vertue of his passiō is not ( according to them ) generall for al sinners and wicked persons , but particuler only for a few elect , that is , for some certaine Protestāts , of some one sect who only are the faithful among them , leauing all the rest destitut of any vertue from it , or of any vocation or iustification by meanes of it . 2. In that those elect it cures not from sinne , but only couers their sinne ; remits not sinne , but only imputes it not ; washes not away the guilt or offence of sin , but only frees them from the punishment due to it ; and enables not a man to resist sinne , but permits him in euery action to sinne ; strengthens him not to keep any one commandement , but leaues him so that he must needes breake all . 3. In that it giues to the soule of mā neither any life of grace , by which it raises him from spirituall death to life , nor any inherent iustice , by which it makes him iust before God , cleane from any sinne , or solid in any perfection of vertue , piety , and good life , nor any vertue by which it enables him to do any good worke , to satisfy for any offence , or to merit any reward of glory , or increase of grace ; nor any inward vnction , by which it adopts him to be , and to be called the sonne of God , or to be inheritour of the kingdome of heauen . 4. It had in Christ , as it was endured and offered by him , no dignity from his diuine person , which did giue an infinit valew and worth to euery action ; it had no vertue or validity to satisfy Gods iustice for any sin , to pay a price sufficient & equiualent for any sinne ; it could not by all the paines and torments which Christ suffered in body , euen to the sheding of the last droppe of his bloud , auaile any thing for mans redemption , except he had suffered in soule also . It could not redeeme man from any sinne , except Christ besides had suffered all the paines due to sinne , euen the same torments of Hell , which any damned doth suffer for sin . It so far ouercame Christ , that it made him troubled , inconsiderate , abrupt , effeminate , doubtfull of Gods fauour , and forgetfull of his office of a Redeemer . It made him wauering , staggering , desperate , & renouncing his saluation . It tormented him with horrour of conscience , with anxiety of mind , with sense of Gods wrath , and with feeling of the sorrowes , paines , and torments of eternall death and hell . All which as it is their doctrine of the death and passion of Christ in their owne particuler wordes before cyted ; so it derogates from the vertue of Christs bloud , & diminish● the dignity of his passion , and is dishonourable , sacrilegious , and blasphemous to his person , and in all oppugnes this article of Christs suffering vnder Pontius Pilate . All which is contrary in our Catholike doctrine , as shal afterward be shewed , which attributes to the vertue and passion of Christ that dignity , validity , and vertue , that euery action , any passion , the least drop of his bloud was sufficient & superaboundant to haue pacified Gods wrath , satisfyed his iustice , paid the price of sinne , & redeemed from sinne & hell , all the world and infinit worlds more ; and that it did de facto merit for all men inward grace to wash away & remit the guilt of sinne , to giue life and beauty to the soule , to adopt it to the title of the sonne of God ; that it did giue strength to man to resist sinne before it be committed , and satisfy for it in some sort after it be committed , to keep Gods Commandmēts , & to merit a reward at Gods handes . Of which doctrine whether doth giue more honour & vertue to the death & passion of Christ , & his suffering vnder Pontius Pilate for vs , let the indifferent Reader be Iudge . Sixthly , in the sixth article , attributed to S. Thomas , is oppugned both the descension of Christ into hell , & his Resurrection from the dead : He descended into hell , and the third day rose againe from the dead . And first his reall descending in soule to Limbus Patrum to free the Fathers there , and make them blessed , or ( which is propable ) to the place of the damned also , not to suffer , but to confound the Diuell , & shew his Maiesty , is oppugned . 1. By those who deny that any Limbus Patrum was euer at all , and affirme that the soules of the dead Patriarches were locally in heauen , though not beatifically blessed by the sight of God before Christ , as (a) Caluin & (b) Beza . 2. By those who deny that as yet there is any locall place of hell at all , or any reall fire and torments of the damned there , as (c) Luther , (d) Bucer , (e) Brentius , (f) Lobecius , (g) Perkins , (h) VVillet , (i) Caluin , & the Deuines of ( k ) Heidelberge . 3. By those who deny his descension to haue been either in body or soule substantially , but only in vertue and effect meritoriously , in that he merited the freedome both of the Patriarches before him , and of vs after him , from the paines of hell , as Bullinger , Zuinglius , the Diuines of VVittemberge , and others . 4. By those who affirme his descension to Hell to haue beene only in body , not in soule , and that not to the lowest Hell , but only to the graue , or buriall ; and so Act. 2. Thou shalt not leaue my soule in hell , they change soule into carkasse , and hell into graue , translating it , Thou shalt not leaue my carkasse in the graue , as Beza , and Bucer . 5. By those who admit his descension to haue beene in soule , but yet suffering the very paines of hell , and of the damned , either after his death in hell , as Luther , Gerlachius , and some other mentioned by Beza , or before his death in the garden , and vpon the Crosse , as Caluin , VVillet , and others before cited . 6. By those who question this article as suspected to haue beene intruded into the Creed , after it was made , as Caluin . All which opinions as they either deny any Limbus Patrum to haue euer beene , or any reall torments of hell as yet to be ; or , as they affirme , Christ to haue descended only in vertue and merit , not in body or soule , or only in body to the graue , or in soule to suffer the paines of hell , either after death in hel , or before death vpon the Crosse and in the garden , are all contrary to this part of this article , in which is affirmed Christs descending into hell , that is , in soule to Limbus to free the Fathers , and Patriarches there , and to carry them with him into heauen . Secondly , his Resurrection from the dead , in the same article , is oppugned . 1. By those who , according to Beza , deny all resurrection as yet of Christs body more then of other mens . 2. By the Vbiquitarians , who affirme his body to haue had immensity , and therby to haue beene euery where in all places euer after his Incarnation . 3. By Caluin , Beza , and other , who deny his Resurrection with the guift of subtility or penetration , and affirme that his body could not pierce through the stone of the sepulcher , or enter the doors to his Disciples without either the remouing , or altering of the nature of the dores , and stone , by resoluing them into some liquid matter . 4. By Caluin and others , who deny the rysing againe of his bloud , that was shed vpon the Crosse , & thereby the resurrection of his whole and entire body . All which , as they deny either any resurrection at all , or the complete Resurrection of Christs body , or the resurrection of the same with subtilty or penetration , do euery one oppugne this article of Christs resurrection from the dead in such due sense as it ought to be belieued . Seauenthly , in the seauenth article , attributed to S. Bartholomew , is oppugned both the ascending of Christ to heauen , and his sitting at the right hand of God the Father , by power and dignity equall to him in person and excelling all creatures in his humane nature . 1. By the Vbiquitarians , who by the all-presence of Christs body in euery place , take from it all possibility of ascending to a new place . 2. By Caluin , who by giuing to Christ a power not equall with God , but Vicary , or deputary to him , and an honour , not the same , but only second in degree to Christ after God the Father ; & by denying al situatiō either of sitting or standing of Christs body in heauen , doth oppose both his Ascension , and sitting at the right hand of God. 3. By the same Caluin , and others who deny all Ascension through the heauens by way of penetration , and admit it only by diuision , and by cutting off the heauens . 4. By those who yield the Patriarches a priority , and deny Christ the primacy of tyme in ascending to heauē . All which , as they either affirme an euery where presence of Christs body , or a difference of honour between● Christ as God , and God the Father , or as they deny either any penetration of Christs body through the heauens , or any priority of his ascending before other soules , are all opposite to the manner of Christs ascension , and sitting at the right hand of God in glory . Eightly , in the eight article attributed to S. Matthew , is oppugned the Cōming of Christ to iudge the quicke and the dead , by their generall doctrine , that God is authour and worker of all sinnes , that the Commandements of God are impossible , that man hath no freewill , that there is no reward for good deedes , that all sinnes be mortall and damnable . For these supposed , no way is left to discusse rightly the differēce of sinnes , to punish iustly mens sinnes , or to reward duly their good deeds . Ninthly , In the ninth article , attributed to S. Iames the lesser , is oppugned the beliefe of the holy Ghost , and of the Catholicke Church ( both which S. Augustine makes one article ) . Of the holy Ghost , in that some , as hath been shewed , make it only the vertue , not the substance of God ; others , expung it out of their Letanies . Others , as the Geneuians , deny the adoration of it . Others , as before do make it the authour & worker of all sinne , the sauiour of all sects , who by a perswasion they cōceiue of it , do euery one assure themselues of saluation ; which authority , reason , and experience conuince to be false . Of the holy Catholicke Church ; in that some reiect the name Catholicke as vaine , and change it into Christian , others leaue it wholy out of the Creed as superfluous , and all of them do generally affirme the Church for many ages to haue beene latent , inuisible , erroneous , adulterous , and antichristian , without either head to gouerne it , or authority to end any controuersies , and to conserue vnity , or to punish offenders in it , and without any sanctity in the professours of it , whom they make all to be sinners , and that in all sinnes generally , and in great sins mortally ; & then how can such a Church be truely holy , vniuersall , and infallible , in deciding the beliefe of articles & determination of controuersies ? Tenthly , In the tenth article , attributed to S. Simon , is oppugned the Communion of Saints , and forgiuenesse of sinnes . The communion of saints is oppugned . 1. The communion of saints in earth one with another , by denying all meanes of vnity in faith vnder one head and Iudge . 2. The communion of saints in earth with the soules in purgatory , by denying all prayer for the dead . 3. The communion of Saints in earth with the Saints in heauen , by denying all honour or praying by vs vnto them , and all knowledge , and praying by them either for vs in earth , or others in purgatory . The remission of sinnes is oppugned by denying al power of priesthood in Gods church to pronounce any sentence of absolution , all vertue in Sacraments to haue any operation as instruments in the remitting of sinne , all infusion of grace to blot out and wash away all vncleannesse and deformity of any sinne , either originall or actuall , which according to them , are neuer remitted or taken away , but only couered , and not imputed . Eleuenthly , In the eleauenth article , attributed to S. Iudas Thaddaeus , is oppugned the resurrection of the body , by all who before oppugned the resurrection of Christs body , and by many who now a dayes , euen in England , admit a resurrection in a like body , but not in the same body which was before . Twelthly , In the twelth article attributed S. Matthias , is oppugned the life euerlasting . 1. By Luther who one while affirmes that the soule is made by propagatiō ex traduce , not by creation , and that the immortality of it is a popish fiction out of the dunghill of the Popes decrees : anotherwhile , that the soules of the iust & of many damned do sleepe senselesse , vntill the day of iudgment , and that dogges , sheep , oxen , and fishes shal be in heauen for our recreation . 2. By Caluin who affirmes that the soules of the blessed remaine sleeping in the porch , & are not as yet entred into the kingdome of glory , that faith is remaining in heauen , that it is foolish & temerarious to enquire where the soules of the iust are , and whether as yet they be in glory , or not . All which & many such like opinions of theirs , as they are the inuention of this priuate spirit , and are both absurd wicked or blasphemous ; so are they all plaine contrary to the Apostles Creed , and do directly oppugne the articles of it . And thus much of this priuate spirits doctrine as it oppugneth the articles of the Creed , and in them all faith and beliefe . Of absurdities against Prayer , and the Pater noster . SECT . VII . SVBDIV. 1. In generall , making all Prayer needlesse , or hopelesse . SECONDLY , This doctrine oppugneth the petitions of the Pater noster , and all manner of prayer and deuotion to God ; for which we may note , that as by faith we come to know God , and his reuealed verities ; so by this hope we are animated to attaine to the fruition of God , & all that is good for vs. An effect of this hope is prayer , by which we are emboldened ( in hope to obteine ) to speake to God , and aske of him what we stand in need of . Prayer therfore as it is , according to S. Augustine , an eleuating of the mind , and a sacrifice to God , a reliefe to man , a terrour to Sathan , a safegard to the soule , a comfort to the Angells , the perfect glory , the certaine hope , and incorrupted preseruer of all religion ; As it is an incense moūting vp to heauen ; a messenger we sēd to God , where our selues cannot yet come ; a ladder by which we climbe to the throne of God , and God descends to our vale of misery ; a hand which we reach to heauen & which God returnes filled with benedictiōs to vs againe : so it is not only a speciall vertue commended vnto vs by Christ who wils vs to pray , and to pray often , yea without intermission , but also a chiefe practise , the particulars wherof Christ himselfe did deliuer to vs both for the matter , what , and the māner , how , we should pray and make our petition . This he did in the Pater Noster , and the seauen petitions of it , which being a compendium of all we are to aske , as the Creed is of all we are to belieue , we make in it , besides the preparatory preface ( which teaches vs to haue confidence in God , in that he is to vs not only a maister but a Father , charity to our brethrē , in that he is our Father and we all brethren , his children by creation and adoption , and a Reuerence both to Gods Maiesty as residing in heauen , and also to his Saints and seruants in whom specially as in the heauens he dwels and reignes by grace , as S. Augustine expounds it ; ) besides , I say , this preface or preparation we make seauen petitions of seauen seuerall things vnto God , in which we desire blessings at Gods hands , either positiue of good things to be obtained ; or preseruatiue from euill things to be auoided . The positiue blessings we craue are either spirituall or corporall ; the spirituall are , 1. the sanctification of Gods name in the first petition , that is , either true knowledge of him , or right honour to him , or constant perseuerance in him . 2. The coming of his kingdome in the second , that is , the dilatation of his Church on earth , the increase of his grace in our harts , & the obteining of his glory in heauen . 3. The obedience to his will in earth , as it is in heauen in the third , that is , as Gods will is done by Angells , so it may be done by man , as it is done by the iust , so it may by sinners , as it is wrought in the spirit , so it may be in the flesh . The corporall blessings we craue , are our dayly bread in the fourth , that is , either temporall food for the body , or doctrinall for knowledge of the vnderstanding , or sacramentall of the Eucharist , and whatsoeuer is conuenient for both soule & body , & these are the four first petitions of positiue blessings . The preseruatiue blessings are from euils from which we desire to be freed , & those either euils past as sin , forgiue vs our trespasses , in the fifth against God , our neighbours , or ourselus , by commissiō or omission , by thought , word or deed ; or euils present lead vs not into tēptation in the sixt , that is , permit vs not to fall into any occasion or danger of sin by concupiscence of the flesh , vanity of the world , and malice of the Diuell ; Or euils to come , deliuer vs from euill in the seauenth , that is , from all paine due to sinne originall or actuall , by affliction in this life , or by torments in the next life either in Purgatory , or in hell , and from whatsoeuer may hinder vs from God , and all goodnes in this or the next life . In which are summarily contained all the thinges pertaining to the honour of God , or necessary for our body or soules , in this life , or the next . It remaines to shew , that the former positions of the Protestants do : make all these petitions needlesse , or fruitlesse ; needlesse , as of thinges certaine , which need to be asked ; fruitlesse , as of thinges impossible which cannot be obtained : which is shewed two wayes , first in generall of all prayer ; secondly in particuler , of these petitions . In generall thus , 1. That prayer is needlesse which prayes for that which is certaine & cannot faile vs , as either already past , or assuredly possest , or to come ; as for example , that Christ should be borne or crucifyed which is past , or that I should be a man , or an English man , which I am sure I am , or that to morrow the Sunne should ryse , or that men should rise at the day of iudgment , which they are sure to do . Againe , that prayer is fruitles which prayes for that which is impossible to be had , as for a mother to pray that she were a Maid , and Virgin againe , or for that an old man to pray that he were young againe , and might neuer dye , both which are impossible , though not both equally . But , according to the Protestant grounds , such are generally all their prayers , for if they pray for remission of sins , for the fauour of God , for perseuerance in Fayth , or for the glory of heauen , their prayer is as needlesse , as to pray for the birth of Christ past , or for the day of iudgment to come , because euery one by his speciall faith belieues as certainly that his sinnes are forgiuen him , as by his generall fayth , that Christ was crucified for him ; as assuredly that he shall perseuer in fayth and come to heauen , as that there shal be a day of iudgment and resurrection of his body ; therefore prayer for the one is as needlesse as for the other . Againe , if they pray for Gods grace to wash them from sin , to keep Gods commandements , to auoid concupiscence and lust , and to loue God aboue all , and not to offend him , their prayer is as fruitlesse , as to pray for Gods grace to keep them euer being sicke or euer dying , or to leape ouer the sea , or fly to the starres , because according to them , the one is as impossible as the other , therefore as hopelesse to be obtained by prayer as the other . 2. To pray for the preuenting of any euil , whether it be malum culpae , as sinne , or malum poenae , as punishment , and whether it be punishment temporall as losse of goods , affliction of body , or death of friends ; or spirituall as losse of fayth , of Gods fauour , and of the ioyes of heauen , or to pray for the obtayning of any good either temporal , as riches , health , or the life of friends ; or spirituall , as the good of Gods Church , the remission of our sinnes , and our perseuerance in state of grace , or obtaining the kingdome of heauen , is both needlesse and fruitlesse , because all as well euill as good shall infallibly fall out as God hath , according to his owne irrespectiue , immutable , & ineuitable will & pleasure , decreed and appointed it ; therefore needlesse it is to pray for the obtaining of good , and fruitlesse to pray for the preuenting of euill , because both must fall certainly as God hath ordained & decreed . What end or vse therfore is there of prayer , since the euent and the effect will be the same as well without prayer as with prayer , all as God , without any respect or foreseene consideration of vs , or our deserts , or prayers , or other works , hath according to his owne absolute will decreed and appointed to happen to vs. Thirdly , willingly to do any act which is belieued and supposed to be a sinne , and that mortall deseruing eternall damnation is vnlawfull , sinnefull , and damnable , and so not to be done with a good conscience : but such is all prayer , euen the best and deuoutest we can vse , according to their principles , because euery worke , euen the good workes of the best persons , according to Luther , Illyricus , Caluin , Beza , Paraeus , VVhitaker , Tindall , and others , are sinnes , mortall sinnnes , damnable sinnes , and nothing but sinne , euen in the iust and elect , though no more imputed to them , then their bad workes of adultery , murder &c. which they say are not at al imputed to them . Therefore all prayer , how good or deuout soeuer , is a sinne , and that mortall and damnable , & so is vnlawfull , sinnefull , and damnable , and not to be vsed more then swearing , lying , drinking , both being sinnes and neither imputed & punished as sinnes in the elect , in whome they are couered , and both imputed and punished as sinne in the reprobate in whome they are neuer forgiuen . All which is confirmed diuers wayes by the expresse wordes , first of Luther , who affirmes , 1. That no man obtaines any thing at Gods hand for any dignity , either in his prayer or in himselfe , but only by the bounty of God. Also , ( which he constantly auouches ) that the iust man doth sinne euen in praying , according to that of Dauid . Let his prayer be a sinne . 2. By the wordes of Illyricus , who affirmes , that prayer is no good worke but a begging of wages . And of Bucer , and Caluin his scholler who both affirme , that Christ did not prescribe vs to pray in these very wordes of the Pater noster , but shewed to what end , and with what affection we should pray . 3. By the practise of many Precisians , or Familists in England , witnesse D. Smyth , who vse to protest they will rather dye , then say the Lords prayer . 4. By the practise of the purer forte of Protestants , who haue left off , & condemne all saying of canonicall houres and deuotion in the Church , & haue not only turned all publicke praying into preaching , neuer vsing any at all in their meetings : but also did for example , in France pull downe & destroy ( witnesse Riche●me ) in one six monthes no fewer then ten thousand houses of prayer , or Churches in 400. Citties , which they by rebellion kept frō their soueraigne King and Prince . By all which is apparent not only how little they esteeme either Prayer , or houses of prayer , but also that , according to their grounds , all prayer in generall is needlesse and fruitlesse , yea sinnefull and damnable , and so not to be vsed and practised . SVBDIV. 2. In particuler , opposing all the seauen Petitions of the Pater Noster . IN particuler , that by this doctrine is oppugned all & euery part and petition of the Pater noster , shall likewise be proued . For first in the preparation Our Father which art in heauen , how can they call or esteeme him a louing Father , whome they belieue to be a cruell and vniust iudge , who decreed and created them to sinne , that , for that he might damne them ? Or what confidence can they haue in the mercy of this Father , who is thus rigorous to them in his iustice ▪ and more then iustice ? How can they call or esteeme themselues his children by adoption from whome they receaue no inward grace of iustification ? How can they call him our Father , or the Father of all , whome they belieue as a Father to haue predestinated , called , and giuen meanes only to a few , and as a cruell Iudge to haue excluded all the rest , and the greatest part ( of which euery one may iustly feare himselfe to be one ) from any possibility of vocation , grace , or saluation ? How can they expect from him a crowne of glory in heauen , of whome they belieue they cannot merit any reward in earth ? Why should they not feare a heauy hand of iustice , yea despaire of any kind of mercy from him , who beyond iustice , hath proceeded so terribly as to predestinate so many to so great paines as are the paines of hell , who had deserued or giuen no cause of any paines at all ? Who can imagine that God dwelleth in the iust and elect as in the heauens , who are so fowly stayned in euery part of their soule with the deformity of all sinne and iniquity , that no one part , or action of them is cleare and vnstained from sinne ? Surely they who belieue this of God , and his cruelty , and of man and his deformity cannot confidently say neither Our Father which imports Gods mercy to man , & mans confidence in God , or VVhich art in heauen ▪ which specifyes that as God dwels in the iust , so they as the temple of God , should be pure and cleane , and bright like to heauen . Secondly , how can they in the first petition say , Hallowed be thy name , and hope that they by true loue , honour , and obedience to God can sanctify , and make holy his name by their life and actions , who belieue that euery action they do , euen the best they can do is a sinne , and that mortall , & damnable ? Surely to pray that by actions which are prophane , we may sanctify Gods name ; that by workes which are offences to God , we may please God ; that by deedes which are damnable and deserue hell , we may prayse God , and deserue heauen ; is a prayer not only so hoplesse , as it is not possible , but also senslesse , that no reasonable man can be imagined to make it . Thirdly , how can they wih confidence say , Thy kingdome come , that is , that Christ may raigne as a King either in his Church by fayth , or in the faythfull by grace , or in heauē by glory , who belieue and professe that Christ was not able to preserue his Church for so many ages togeather , without errour of Antichristianity and Idolatry , no not so much as in extancy or visibility , nor yet hath power by grace so to raigne in any his seruants , as to maister any sin or temptation to sin , or to performe any one commandement , or to do any one action , which is iust and not sinnefull . Surely weake is that King , & poore is that Kingdome , where neither the King hath power to protect his subiects from the inuasion of the enemy , nor the subiect hath ability to performe any action which may tend to the honour and seruice of the King. Againe what needes any man to pray that either Christ may raigne in him by grace present , or that he may raigne with Christ in glory to come , who is certaine and sure by his speciall fayth ( as all Protestants say they are ) that both he is for the present in state of Gods fauour , and also shal be for the future in state of glory in heauen ? Surely , he that belieues this needs not to pray either for pardon of sinnes , which he is sure are pardoned , or for his obtaining heauen , which he is sure to obtaine . Fourthly , how can any one in the third Petition , say , Thy will be done in earth as it is in heauen ? Vnderstanding that Gods will should by vs be performed in doing good deedes , and auoiding bad , & that we should conforme our selues to the will of God both in the materiall obiect , by doing that which he will haue done , and in the formall by doing it both for the end and after the manner as he will haue it done ; who belieues , 1. That man hath no freedome or power to worke the will of God. 2. That Gods will is wrought in euery action as well bad as good . 3. That the will of God in performing his commandements is impossible . 4. That good workes in this life are neither meritorious , nor necessary , nor yet possible . 5. That in earth euery man , and euery action of his is sinnefull and vncleane , and in heauen euery Saint , & Angell , and euery action of theirs is good , pure , and perfect . For , as it is needlesse to pray , that Gods will be performed , which ineuitably shal be performed both in good and bad actions , in which man hath no liberty or power ; so it is bootlesse to pray that men may either be freed from sinne , or may do good workes , or may fullfill Gods commandements , or may do his will in earth , as Saints and Angels do it in heauē , because according to their beliefe all this in this life is impossible , and neither euer was , nor euer shal be by any , at any tyme performed . In vaine therefore is it for vs to pray , that we may conforme our selues to the will of God either in the affirmatiue precept , in doing that which he commaunds ; or in the negatiue precept , in omitting that which he forbids ; either in the materiall obiect , in doing what he commands , or in the formall , in doing how , and why he commands , sith both , and all are either necessary , and so must be done ; or impossible , and so cannot be done . Fifthly , how can any man say , Giue vs our dayly bread ? Vnderstanding either of temporall sustenance for the reliefe of the body , or of Sacramentall food , the body and bloud of Christ , who belieues either that the decree , will , and ordinance of God doth impose an infallible and an ineuitable necessity vpon all things , whereby all thinges necessary wil be prouided for vs as God hath ordayned without our prayer ; or that the Eucharist is not the true body and bloud of Christ but only a figure or signe of it , because the beliefe of the former takes away all necessity of praying for temporall sustenance , and the misbeliefe of the latter opposes all desire of the supersubstantiall bread of the body of Christ in the Eucharist . Sixthly , how can any man with confidence say , Forgiue vs our trespasses , as we forgiue them that trespasse against vs ? Vnderstanding by trespasses his debts or sinnes , by forgiue , remit or take away the same . For if Fayth be precedent and presupposed to prayer , as it is ( for els how can we as we ought with fayth and confidence aske and pray ) and the same faith ( as they say ) doth assure vs by a certaine and infallible perswasion that our sinnes are already forgiuen or not imputed ; then surely in vaine , needlesse , yea foolish is our petition to haue them remitted or not imputed . 2. If euery good worke be a sinne ( as they defend ) and that mortall , then by sinne and that mortall ( such as is the saying , though neuer so deuoutly , of this prayer and petition ) is sinne remitted , and so comitting of sinne should be a meanes to obtaine remissiō of sinne , which is most absurd , as though the committing of a new offence should be a motiue to pardon the old . 3. If no sinne be remitted in this life , but only couered and not imputed , then in vaine , and hoplesse is our prayer for remission and taking away our sinnes , as of a thing impossible , and needlesse ; and bootlesse is our prayer for the not imputation of the same , because ( as before ) in the elect , they are already not imputed , & in the reprobate they neuer shal be imputed ; either therefore fruitlesse and hopelesse , as a thing impossible , is the remitting and taking away of our sinnes ; or needlesse & fearelesse , as a thing certaine , is the not imputation of the same by this petition demanded , sith the one is impossible to be obtained , and the other is certainly already possessed and enioyed : needlesse therefore , or hopelesse is this petition of forgiuenes of our sinnes , by their principles . Seauenthly , how can any man with confidence , in the sixt petition say , Lead vs not into temptation ? that is , into no danger or occasion of sinne , into no consent or act of sinne to to come , who belieues , 1. That God wills and workes all sinnes and occasions of sinnes . 2. That as he hath already decreed , so euery action and occasion must be . 3. That by no sinne he can fall from Fayth or grace , or loose heauen ; for if all sinne be ineuitably determined , then it shall infallibly be wrought by God as he hath determined . And if euery actiō in man be a sinne , then impossible it is to be freed from it , & so hopelesse is the praying for that end . And if no sinne can hurt a faythfull Christian , nor hinder him of heauen , or depriue him of grace ; then in vaine & needlesse is all prayer to be freed from temptation to sinne , which can neither hurt , nor hinder any faythfull person from heauen . In vaine therfore , and to no end or benefit is the saying of this sixth petition , Lead vs not into temptation . Eightly , how can any man with confidence say the seauenth petition , Deliuer vs from euill ? Vnderstanding it of the paines and punishments of sinne , or impediments of good thinges , to be inflicted , either in this life , or in the next , who belieues that no temporall punishment , either in this or the next life , remaines to be endured after the guilt of sin be remitted , and that all paine or miserie inflicted by the Diuell or man is from God , the Diuell and man being only instruments , and that forced & necessitated to it . For where no punishment remaines as due either in Purgatory , which they belieue not , or in this life , in which only fayth satisfyes and remits ; Where also the ineuitable decree and hand of God doth will , and worke all punishment in body or goods , and where all things do fall out infallible as God hath disposed , there all prayer to preuent punishments for sinnes , or to remoue impediments of good thinges , is both needlesse , because , as well without as with prayer , the euent must fall as God hath disposed , and also fruitlesse , because by it no punishment of sinne , or impediment of good thinges ordained by God can be preuented . To what end , or with what confidence therfore can any , who belieues the former doctrine , say these petitions of the Pater noster , sith by vertue of it all prayer in generall , and this of the Pater noster in particuler , is made either needlesse as of things which are certaine to succeed without it , or hopelesse as of things which are impossible to haue any effect by it ? And thus is shewed how the Protestant doctrine is opposite to all Hope , and doth make frustrate all manner of prayer , by which we come with any confidence to obtaine at Gods handes any benefit for vs , or remoue any euill from vs. Of absurdities against the obseruation of all lawes , and chiefly of the ten Commandements . SECT . VIII . SVBDIV. 1. In generall , how all lawes are made impossible , and not obliging . WE haue shewed how the Protestant doctrine ouerthroweth the articles of the Creed , and the petitions of the Pater noster , and in them all certainty of fayth & all exercise of hope by making of prayer : it remaines that we shew how it likewise frustrates all precepts , & lawes which tend to good life by bidding good , and forbidding euill , and among them in particuler the Decalogue of the ten Commandements , and thereby openeth the gappe , and looseth the reines to all liberty of sinne , and loosenesse of life , to the ruine of Charity . For which we may note , 1. That lawes ( which euer haue beene , at all tymes among al nations , vsed as the chiefe meanes to withdraw men from euill , and to prepare them to good ( by punishing the one , and rewarding the other ) haue alwayes by wise men beene esteemed of that dignity and necessity , that according to Pindarus , they are the inuention and guift of God , according to Chrysippus , that they are very God himselfe , who giues them , & the Queene of all actions diuine and humane . According to Aristotle , they are the rule of iustice and iniustice , which we must apply to all actions , and by which all businesses and persons are ruled ; the measure by which we must square what we are to do , and what to omit ; the Prince whome we ought to obey , and the Captaine whome it is fit to follow . According to Tully , they are the establishing of right , & the suppression of wrong . According to Demosthenes , the sinewes of the Citty , and the strength of it against the wicked . Without which sayth Plato , a commō-wealth is not a cōmon-wealth . And according to which if men did not liue they would nothing differ from beasts . 2. These lawes , are some naturall of reason , and a mans conscience ; some positiue , diuine of God , which were established either by Moyses in the old law , and were either morall , ceremoniall , or iudiciall ; or by Christ , and his Apostles in the new law , and are yet of fayth and Sacraments , Charity or good life ; some humane , which are either Canonicall of the Church , or Ciuill for all nations , or particuler of seuerall countryes , all which being iust , promulgated , and knowne , do oblige , and that in conscience vnder sinne to the performance of them . 3. Among these lawes the chiefest and most in force are the Decalogue , or the ten Commandments , which being lawes morall of good manners , and agreable to naturall reasons , are not with the ceremoniall and iudiciall law ( which were giuen only for that tyme and estate of the law of Moyses ) abrogated , but stand still in force , and oblige all men and nations to the performance . 4. In these ten Commandements we are commanded to performe our duty to God in the first table , and to our Neighbour in the second table . To God , first , honour in our hart , by adoring one , not many Gods , in the first Commandement . 2. Reuerence in word , in not prophaning his name by vaine swearing , in the second . 3. Obedience in fact , by keeping his Sabboth and Festiuall day , in the third . 4. To our Neighbour , we are to giue , by affirmatiue precept , honour to our Parents and Superiours , in the fourth : and by negatiue precept to auoid al wrongs done to our Neighbour , 1. By exteriour fact , either to his own selfe by killing , in the fifth , or to his second selfe , his wife , by adultery , in the sixth : or to his goods , by stealing , in the seauenth . 2. In word by false witnesse , in the eight . 3. In hart by vnlawful desiring either his wife by concupiscence , in the ninth ; or his goodes by auarice , in the tenth Commandment . Which Decalogue of ten Commandments doth oblige to performance , not only Christians who professe the name & fayth of Christ ; but also all sortes of men or women endewed with reason , whether Iewes , Turkes , Pagans , or whomesoeuer . Now , that the Protestants by their doctrine do abrogate all these lawes , not only of Church or Common-wealth , but also of God , of Nature , of the ten Commandments , and whatsoeuer , & leaue man obliged to the performance of none , but by the liberty of their Ghospell freed from all , as hauing it in their free choice whether they wil keep or break any Commandement of God , Church , or King ; and that they do thereby draw backe from the practise of any vertue , & draw forward to the practise of vice , and so remoue al encouragement to vertue , and propose all enticements to vice , by which they do open a wide gap to all liberty and loosenesse of life , and giue a free passage to all concupiscence and sensuality of sinne , to what any mans imagination , or affection shall lead him : That this their doctrine ( I say ) doth this , shall by these , and the former positions , and illations vpon them , be conuinced . For first they take away from the Christian-common-wealth all superiority , by affirming that among Christians is no superiour , that a Christian is subiect to none , but only to Christ , who only is his immediate superiour , as (a) Luther . 2. They take away from Superiours all spirituall and temporall power to make any lawes , affirming , as (b) Luther , & (c) Caluin do , that to make lawes and to rule by lawes is proper only to God , & that no man can forbid that which is not forbid by Christ . 3. That they take from lawes all obligation to bind in conscience , affirming all , as (d) Luther , Caluin , Zuinglius , Beza , Martyr , Danaeus , VVhitaker , Perkins , & others do , that no Magistrate or Lawes are to be obeyed for conscience , that all lawes of men are to be abolished , that the laws of the Apostles oblige not but for scandall , that there is no sinne or obligation in conscience to any law , but of God. 4. They derogate from Gods lawes , holding that it is impossible for any man though iust to performe and satisfy the law , or to keep the Commandements , or any one of them , that therefore the law commands thinges impossible , which is a fundamentall point of Christian religion to be belieued , and that the contrary , which affirmes the keeping of the law to be possible , and the gayning of heauen to be proposed cōditionally if we keep the law , is a wicked perswasion . So the Confession (e) of Auspurge and England , so Luther , Melancthou , Caluin , Beza , Danaeus , VVhitaker , Perkins , Scharpius , Adaemus Francisci , and others . 5. They abolish the morall law of the Decalogue , or ten Commandements , affirming , that it is free and nothing belongs to any iust regenerate , and pious person , & that the breach of it to any faythfull shall not be imputed as a sinne , nor punished as a sinne ; thus (g) Luther , Melancthon , Zuinglius , Martyr , Caluin , Beza , VVhitak . Tindaell , Bucan . Bullinger and others , whereupon they inferre that the obseruation of the law is not necessary to saluation : thus (g) Luther , Caluin , Perkins , Piscator , Paraeus , and Martyr : That no Saint as yet euer did fullfill the law and obey it , nor loue God with his whole hart , as the law requires ; thus the (h) Confessions of Auspurge , Scotland , and Bohemia , Luther , Caluin , Brentius , Paraeus , Danaeus , & others . And that we should not vse any prayer for that end , that we may fulfill the law , but only that we may endeauour to fullfill it ; thus (i) Caluin , Perkins , and others doe affirme . To which assertions if we adde their other positions before mentioned . 1. About good works , that they are not pleasing to God as any worship to him , but are all sinnes & that mortall , and neither free , nor meritorious , nor necessary , nor profitable , nor possible , nor any cause of saluation , & therfore can haue no dignity , no merit , no reward , no crowne of iustice . 2. About sin , that God wils , works , and is pleased with sinne , doth predestinate , command , tempt , & necessitate to sinne , & that no sinne is imputed to the elect , that no sinne can be auoided , that no sinne is any cause of damnation . 3. About iustification , that only faith doth iustify , & that by assuring a man of his iustification , which once had can neuer be lost ; that no iustice is inherent but all imputed , that none doth take away any sinne but only couer it , that none doth make a man iust before God but only before man. If , I say , we adde these their positions and doctrine ( which are their common Tenents , and before proued ) to the former , it will euidently appeare that their doctrine of it selfe , without any wresting or forcing it , is a spurre to vice and a bridle to vertue , is a retractiue from good life , and an attractiue to bad , & doth stope the way to a mind enclined to morall honesty , & open the gat to one disposed to loosnesse and liberty . SVBDIV. 2. In particular , how many wayes the Protestant Doctrine incourageth to the breach of all lawes , and to all lewdnes of life . AND first , if a man should belieue not only the articles and points reuealed in Scripture , but also the consequences deduced from them ( as most Protestants hould ) thē may euery Protestant out of these their former principles , by euident consequence deduced , belieue and practise these , & such like positions and practises which draw from all piety to impurity , and which do euidently follow out of the former principles . First therfore , he may reason and accordingly practise thus : The obseruation of the ten commandments , yea of any one , is impossible , and by the liberty of the ghospell I am freed from all obligation to any , as well morall as ceremoniall precepts , Ergo in vaine do I labour to keepe them , in vaine do I ēdeauour to abstaine from idolatry , periury , prophaning the Sabboth , disobedience to Superiours , murder , adultery , theft , false witnesse , concupiscence , or the like , because it is as impossible for me to keepe thē as for me to leap ouer the sea : Because by the liberty of the Gospel I am freed from the obligation as well of them as of the ceremonial precepts , and therfore may as well breake the Sunday as the Saturday , as well commit fornication as eat porke or bacon , as well omit duty to parents or princes , as circumcision or the paschall lambe sith all are equally abrogated , and neither sinne nor punishment of either is imputed ; Ergo , Why shall not I as well commit , as auoid swearing , drinking , murder , adultery , or the rest ? Why not as well yield to , as resist concupiscence ? Why not as well consent , as dissent , as well follow , as forbeare my pleasures , as well feed , as bridle my appetites and passions ? because both are against the commāmandement which is impossible to be kept , and neither imputed to me for sinne , which by faith is fully remitted . Secondly , He may reason , and accordingly practise thus : No prince or Prelate hath any power to make lawes which shall oblige the subiect in conscience ; Ergo I am not bound in conscience and vnder any sinne to obey them , but may , ( so as publicke scandall or punishmēt can be auoided ) breake them at my pleasure , so it be priuate and vnknowne ; therfore may I vnderhand breake the Canons & iniunctions of the Church , and vse simony , bribery , and the rest : Therfore need I not obserue the lawes of the commō wealth , but may bring in or trasport forbidden goods , deny tolles , taxes or imposts , breake any statute , either as a magistrate , or as a subiect , so I can auoid scandall and punishment , because vnder sinne , and in conscience I am obliged to none of these lawes , and statutes . Thirdly , He may reason and practise thus : No good works are meritorious , none are necessary , none are possible , all , euen the best , being sins , and that mortall , as infected with originall sinne , and defectiue from the law ; Ergo , in vaine do I labour to do good works which are impossible , in vaine do I labour to serue and please God by them , sith al are sinnes , and that mortall ; Why therfore shall I do rather good workes , then bad ? Why liue I piously , rather then wickedly ? Why do I iustice , rather then iniustice , make restitution , rather then commit rapine ? Vse praying , rather then swearing ? frequent Sermons , rather then Tauerns ? because neither the one nor the other deserue reward , or are pleasing to God , and both the one and the other are damnable sinnes and deserue hell , but neither are imputed as sinnes ; but both couered by the Iustice of Christ , apprehended by my faith . Fourthly , He may reason and practise thus : Only faith doth iustify , & iustifying doth infallibly make me as certaine of remission of my sinnes as I am of Christs death , and therby certaine of my perdestination , and election , ( for none are truly faithfull and iustified but the elect ) and certaine also of my perseuerance and glorification ( for faith once had cannot be lost : ) What then need I to feare , either for seruil feare , any punishment of hell ? because I am sure of heauen : or , for filiall feare , any offence of God ? because I am sure that he imputes no sinne or offence to me , and that neither he will forsake me , nor I can fall from him : or , for reuerentiall feare , any Maiesty and goodnesse of God who wil not be offended for that which is wild & wrought by himselfe ? And because his lawes or precepts are aboue my power , and , as impossible , do not oblige in conscience , what need I to make any conscience of any sinne either past , or committed , or to come and in danger to be committed ? because I am sure that none shal be imputed , that none can take from me Gods grace and fauour , that all by faith are couered , and that my Baptisme was to me a signe and seale of remissiō of al sinnes past and to come ? What need I either contrition or sorrow , either pennance or satisfaction , either fasting or good workes , either prayer or preaching , because I am sure that all satisfaction is made for me by Christ , & that any sinne of myne is impossible , that also my prayer & penance are sinnes ; that my sinnes are already forgiuen , & that I am certainly the sonne of God ; and so certaine to continue , and to come to heauen . Fiftly , He may reason and practise thus : I haue no free-will or liberty either of contradiction , to do or not to do ; or of specification , to do good or bad , but am by the decree and will of God necessitated to do what I do , & what God hath ordeined me to do : Ergo , vnreasonable is God , who hath imposed vpon me precepts which I haue no power or freedome to performe ; vniust is God , who punishes me for doing that which he wils me to do , & in which I haue no freedome of wil to the contrary ; Impious are magistrats and iudges who punish me for that which God wils , cōmands , & compels me to do ; Impossible is all vertue and vice in me which can be no more vertue or vice in me then in a beast , if I want freedome of will ; foolish am I , who labour to do that which I haue no power , or liberty to do . In vaine do either lawes terrify me , or superiours admonish me , or preachers exho●r me to that which I haue no power , liberty , or freedome to omit or commit , to choose or refuse . All which followes vpon the want of my freewill , and ability to do good . Sixtly , He may reason , and practise thus : God hath decreed , appointed , and predestinated , of his owne meere wi , without any respect to me or my demerit , whether I shal be damned or saued , the one or other as he hath appointed ; In vaine therefore am I solicitous , or do I labour for either , sith , without my care or labour , that must be , which God hath appointed , and not my labour can alter , further , o● hinder either . Againe , God doth will , command , and worke , as the principall agent , all sinne which is wrought in me , why shal I therfore detest that which God wils , or auoid that which God commands , or not do that which God wils , commands and works in me ? Againe , if I be an elect , God giues all meanes so certaine of saluation that I cannot reiect them ; if I be reprobate he denies me all meanes necessary , either of the merits of Christ offered for me , or of grace and faith s●fficient for me : In vaine therefore is all my labour , because if God hath prepared for me meanes effectuall they wil be applied as they are decreed without me ; if not , they will not be obteined by me and my care : let therfore all care of heauen or hell be left to God and his ordination , and let vs liue merrily , fare daintily , spend freely , feed our sense and appetit fully , and leaue all care or cogitation of heauen or hell to Gods decree and ordinance , which according to his will , not our care , will haue the effect which he hath appointed . This follows in reason , and thus in reason may any one inferre and reason , supposing he belieue the aforesaid false principles . SVBDIV. 3. To what vices the Protestant doctrine leads . SEAVENTHLY , For vices in particular , how euery one doth receiue life , grouth , nourishment , and encouragement by this their doctrine , & how men may be whetted and animated to the free exercise of the same vices by vertue of it , may by these reasons appeare . 1. Slouth ( which , saith the wiseman teaches many euils (a) , and is the stepdame saith S. Bernard , of vertue , the mother of sinne ; and the root and nurse , saith S. Chrisostome , of desperation ) is by this doctrine nourished . For who will labour who assures himselfe that his labours , works , and sufferings haue neither any reward , nor make any satisfaction ; but that they deserue hell and eternall punishment , and that by them he can no more please God performe his will , or fulfill his commandements then he can reach the starres or leape ouer the seas , and that he hath no freedome or liberty of wil , but must do as by God he is appointed and compelled , and that only faith , and apprehension of the iustice of Christ will suffice to his iustification and saluation . Secondly , Chastity which is commended in scripture , as deseruing immortall praise by God & man (a) ; as of more worth then all weight (b) ; as the fruit of the spirit (c) ; and as that which maks pages , or followers of the lambe (d) Christ Iesus ; & is indeed according to S. Cyprian , the ornament of noblemen , the nobility of meane men , the beauty of the deformed , the comfort of the sorrowfull , the augmentour of beatitude , honour of religion , the diminisher of vices , the multiplier of vertue , and the spouse of the omnipotent , and which was so imbraced in the Primitiue Church , that in some places a thousand , in other two thousands , in others 3000. in others 5000. men , and in others as at Ancyra , 10000. women professed it in one place , and preferred it before the riches and pleasures of the world : This precious vertue and pearle is debauched , & Luxury ( which is , as one cals it , the gate to hell , the way to iniquity , the biting of a scorpion , the birdlime of wickednesse , and the fountaine of perdition ) is fomented and increased by this doctrine . For who will labour to liue chastly who belieues , as they teach ▪ that Chastity is impossible , and no more in mans power then it is not to be a man ; that a woman is as necessary as to eat , drinke , sleepe or sneese ; that marriage is as gold , virginity as dung ; that all are to be condemned as guilty of murther who do not giue themselues to beget children ? Who will abstaine from any sensuall lust , and brutish concupiscence , to which his affection leads him , who perswades himselfe that a man or womā sins as much in hauing a suggestion or motion of concupiscence , though resisted , as in consenting , delighting , or acting the sinne it selfe ; that it is no more sinne to yield , then to resist lust ; that the sinne is pardoned before hand by vertue of the seale of Baptisme , and no more imputed by the meanes of faith then though it had neuer beene committed . He surely that is taught this , and belieues this , and withall that neither this nor any sinne can expell , or take away his faith , or damne him ( Infidelity only excepted ) is foolish if he feare sinne , and is senselesse and labours in vaine , if he seeke and labour to bridle his concupiscence , to mortify his affections , to resist his temptations , or to restraine , or not giue himselfe to all sensuality his heart can desire ; which freely and fully he may do , as by this doctrine he is warranted and secured . Surely he that belieues thus , as thus he is taught , needs not feare any detriment to his soule or any punishment of his sinne , or any offence of God : what therefore can , or at least will restraine him from following his fleshly appetites , specially in secret ? Thirdly , Cruelty ( which how odious it is , is by diuers examples before declared ) with all rage , ire , and reuenge , and the practise of them is by vertue of this doctrine dangerously perswaded : for who will not be encouraged to inflict any seuere punishment and cruell tortures for any little offence committed against him , who belieues that God ordaines soules to such horrible punishments in hell for no offence committed , or forseene to be committed against his Maiesty ? Who desirous to imitate God , will not rather exercise , then detest actions of all cruelty and tyranny , when he belieues that God is a iudge so seuere , cruell , and tyrannous , that he ordaines and creates men to damnation and sinne , and for the same sinne which himselfe commands & works in them doth himselfe torment them with those horrible torments of eternall fire in hell ? Who may not be incited to lay vpon subiects and seruants any command though neuer so heauy and intollerable , when they read & belieue that God laies vpon al men precepts which are impossible to be performed ? Who will bridle his rage and fury of passion when he perswades himselfe that he offends Gods as much in resisting , as in yielding to it ; and that neither Gods particular fauour , nor his speciall faith and ●ustice is lost , nor any sinne shal be imputed , or punishment inflicted vpon him for the sinne , though in his rage he should kill , murder , and vse all reuenge vpon his enemies ? What needs therefore any man to feare , or care in conscience what secret murder or villany he contriues or works , so he can but auoid the shame or the world , or the punishment of the lawes ? Fourthly , Pride which is the sinne (a) which God hates , & is (b) abomination to God , and the begining of all sinne , & apostacy from God ; Which is , according to S. Gregory , the root of all euill , and the queene of all vices ; Yea according to S. Augustine , the begining , the end , and the cause of all sinnes , and which makes vs like to the diuels , as humility doth to the Angels : This pride is by this their doctrine kindled , and as by bellowes blowne and set on fire . For what a strong motiue to pride and rebellion against all superiours is it , for one to perswade himselfe that he is by his priuate spirit immediatly taught of God , vnderstands all doctrine reueiled by God , needs no instruction or direction from his Pastour , but may iudge and censure him , yea & with him all the ancient Pastours , Doctours , Bishops , and Saints of Gods Church , and may preferre his owne priuate iudgment and opinion before the generall Iudgment and doctrine of Gods Church ? How forcible a perswasion to pride and presumption is it , for one to assure himselfe that he is sure of Gods fauour , and of keeping it ▪ of remission of his sinnes , and of perseuerance in grace to the end , and that no sinne or offence can separate him from the fauour of God and from heauen ? yea that he is as iust and perfect as Peter , Paul , and the mother of God ▪ that God fauours him as much as he did Christ , and will as assuredly free him from hell and bring him to heauen a● he hath done Christ , and that without any his labour ; that he hath as much right to heauen as Christ hath , and can be no more damned then Christ can be . Which , are Luthers and Zuinglius words . The assurance of all which cannot but be a vehemēt perswasion to cause any man highly to esteeme of himselfe , and to neglect all humility and feare of himselfe , and all care with feare and trembling to worke his saluation . By all which is euident that this Protestāt doctrine is a great motiue and incentiue to all idlenesse , lust , cruelty , and pride , and so to all other vices ; and a strong impediment to the practise & exercise of all contrary vertues and perfection . SVBDIV. 4. Bad life , 1. In the Common people , 2. In the Ministers . 3 In the first Reformers of Protestant religion , confessed to be an effect of this doctrine . WHICH yet that it may more plainly appeare , and the more fully by example and practise be conuinced , I will produce the open confession of many prime Protestants by whom this fruit and effect of this priuate spirit , and the doctrine of it , is confessed in their practise . 1. In generall , of all the common people . 2. More particularly of their Ministers and maisters . 3. Most specially of the chief founders & pillars of their religion . By all whose conf●ssion is made apparent that lewd life , wicked works , and all licentious & Epicurean liberty among Protestants is neither a corruption of the time , nor an infirmity of mans nature , nor a Nationall vice only , nor yet an abuse of doctrine , or a defect of good order and discipline ; but only and truly a proper fruit and effect , naturally issuing from the substance of their doctrine , and conformable to the principles of it , being borne , nourished , and increasing together with it , and by vertue of it gaining breath , strength , and ability . And first concerning the vulgar and common people ▪ For Germany where the Ghospel began , 1. Luther confesseth that the world groweth dayly worse ; that men are now more reuengfull , couetous , licentious then they were euer before in the Papacy (a) . That , Before time when we were seduced by the Pope , euery man did willingly follow good works , and now euery man neither faith nor knoweth any thing , but how to get all to himselfe by exactions , pillage , theft , lying , vsury &c. (b) . That , It is a wonderfull thing and full of scandall , that from the time in which the pure doctrine of the Ghospell was first recalled to light , the world should dayly grow worse . That no History of the Gentils made mention of so diabolicall malice & hatred as is found among those to whom the word is preached . The nobility , Husbandmen and all are growne so wicked , that whereas before ( in Papistry ) they had some shew of modesty , now they are growne so mad and furious as though they were all full of diuels . That , Men who bragge now of the Gospell and faith in their words , are , if they be inwardly examined , nothing at all : therfore the greatest of those who heare the Gospell , do deceiue themselues , and with their false faith go to hell . That , In this only we now shew our selues professours of the Ghospell , in that we will communicate vnder both kinds , throw downe Images , eat flesh ▪ and neither fast nor pray . This is the witchery of Sathan , that he will draw men from the Pope , but not to Christ. This Luther of his new conuertites the first fruit of his Ghospell . Melancthon , Luthers great friend and the glory of the first Protestants , saith that , The case is cleare that in these Countries all time and care is spent in drinking , banqueting , and cups ; & that the people are come to that barbarousnesse , that they thinke if they fast but one day they cannot liue till the next night . Erasmus Sarcerius , a prime Lutheran , acknowledges that It cannot be otherwise but that lust must preuaile , sith fornication & adultery are accounted among vs for no sins , for old and yong do nothing but drinke and dance . And wheras among the ancient Germans an adulterer was not so much as heard off , now that sinne is growne so common that it is counted but a sporte and iest , and often Adulterers are more esteemed then honest and shamfast men . Smidelinus , as famous as the rest , saith , That , Since we haue heard that to fast is neither a good worke nor pleasing to God , we haue left all manner of fasting and betaken our selues only to bankets and drinkings ; so that if a man mention but fasting he is suspected that he is turned papist . That , Our Ghospellers are so far from mending their manners , that nothing but bestiality , Epicur●sme , gluttony , vsury , pride , blasphemy and prophanation of Gods holy name is among them . And , That the whole world may see that they are no Papists , nor put any trust in good works , they do not any good worke at all , insteed of fasting they drinck day and night , insteed of praying they banne and curse others . And do so horrible blaspheme the name of God , that the like is not heard among the Turks . And yet this must be so Euangelicall that they notwithstanding dare assure themselues that they haue faith in God , haue God propitious to them , and are better then Idolatrous Papists . Brentius saith , that , Such is the corruption of manners in these times , and such the desire to do wrong , that there is no occasion of confiding in good works : for why shall they confide in them which they haue not ? Ioan. Spangenberge saith , that , It is a true word , and often repeated by many Doctors , that after the reuelation of Antichrist men wil be so wild that they will neither acknowledge nor haue any care of God , but will do as they will , what the diuell , and the flesh shal suggest . This is now fulfilled , for since the lies and deceits of Antichrist and the Pope haue beene reuealed , men begin to belieue nothing , and seing they are free from the bands of popery , they wil be free from the Ghospell and all precepts of God , and make that right and iust which euery one will. Caluin saith , that , Men of his sect are the most wicked and flagitious of all mortall men , yea so wicked that words cannot be found to expresse their wickednesse . They are horrible monsters , and diuels in mens forme . Wolphangus Musculus a prime Protestant confesseth , that , To tell the truth they are become so vnlike themselues , that wheras in the Papacy they were religious in their errour and superstition , now in the light of the knowne truth , they are more prophane then the very sonnes of this world . Andreas Musculus , another famous Lutheran , also saith : The case thus standeth at this present with vs Lutherans , that if any be desirous to see a great rable of knaues , of persons turbulent , deceitfull , coseners , vsurers , let him go to any citty where the Ghospell is purely preached , and he shall find them there by multituds . It is more manifest then day-light , that there neuer among the Ethnickes , Turkes , and other Infidels were more vnbridled , and vnruly persons with whome all vertue & honesty is quite extinct , then are among the Professours of the Ghospell at this day . That , to speake of fasting is but to loose paper and tyme : the Germans care not now for fasting , but for bibbing and banquetting : if any shall but mention fasting , though he alleadge neuer so much Scripture for it , he shall presently be counted a Papist , or an Heretike . Bucer , one of the first , and most prime reformers confesseth , that the thing which the greatest part do seeme chiefly to haue aymed at by the Ghospell , is to cast off the yoake of all whatsoeuer manner of discipline , pennance , and Religion which remayned in Papistry , and to do all thinges according to the will and lust of their flesh . For which it is not vngratefull to them to heare , that a man is iustifyed by only Fayth , and not by good workes , to which they haue no desire at all . Paulus Eberus , a prime reformer with Luther , confesseth , That our whole Euangelicall congregation is so full of Schismes and offences , that it is nothing lesse then that it makes shew to be , which while all see with their owne eyes , not without cause they doubt whether our euangelicall company be the true Church , in which so many , and so enormous vices are seene . Iacobus Andreas , a great promotour of Lutheranisme , confesses that , Christian and serious discipline commanded by Christ , and required of Christians , is esteemed among vs new popery & monkery ; for since we learned to be saued by only faith in Christ , good works haue been left of , sith without them we may be saued by relying vpon Christ only and his grace and merits . And that the world may know that they are no Papists , nor do put any trust in good works , they will not do any good worke at all : but insteed of fasting , will night & day lye bibbing and banqueting , instead of praying stand swearing . And this kind of life is called by them Euangelicum Institutum , the institution of the Ghospell . Wigandus a famous man , one of the Centurians , sayth , That the youth among the Ghospellers become dayly lesse tractable , & more bould to commit those vices which in former tymes men of years knew not . Simon Vion cries : VVoe vpon Lub●cke , Hamburge , Rostocke for their adulteries , fornications drunkennesse , vsury , lying , and all vices ; and woe to Saxony for keeping such a light of Euangelicall truth in so wicked life and manners ! So of the rest . To all which we will adde Erasmus , though not one of their Religion , yet esteemed by them as a fauourer , & a present eye witnesse of them , and their life , who pronounceth this sentence of them : Looke , sayth he , euery where vpon these Euangelicall people , and bring me one whome this Ghospell hath made of a drunkard , sober ; of a ●eacher , chast ; of one shamelesse , shamfast . I can shew many who are become worse then they were before , whom I knew pure , sincere , and without dissembling ; the same I haue seene , after they gaue themselues to this Euangelicall sect , to haue learned to talke of wenches , to play at dice , to leaue of praying , to be most ●mpatient , reuengefull of all iniuries , vaine , viperlike in manners , and destitute of all humanity , I speake by experience . Wherupon it grew to a prouerbe , ( witnesse one of their owne ) among them , that when they were disposed to yield to their natural lust , they would say ; To day we will liue Lutheran like . All which is spoken of the Lutherans in Germany . For the Protestants of England ( to omit for breuity other Nations , and their life ) M. Geffrey a great preacher and trauailer , confesseth plainely : I may freely speake what I haue plainely seene in the course of some trauells , and obseruation of some courses , that in Flandres was neuer more drunkennesse , in Italy more wantonnesse , in Iury more hypocrisy , in T●rkie more impiety , in Tartary more iniquity , then is practised generally in England , and particulerly in London . M. Stubs , a like famous preacher , who trauelled through all England to see the māners of the people , after all his iourney pronounceth this sentence : As concerning the people I found them in most places , dissolute , proud , enuious , malicious , disdaineful , couetous , ambitious , carelesse of good workes ; that for good workes who seeth not that they ( the Papists ) were farre beyond vs , and we farre behind them . In witnesse whereof he recounts what Monasteries , Churches , Hospitalls , Bridges , Schooles ▪ Colledges ▪ and Vniuersityes were builded by Catholickes , and pulled downe by Protestants . The Puritans in their mild Defence confesse , and say : VVhat eye so blind that it doth not gush out with teares to behould the misery of our supposed Church , I meane , the great ignorance , the superficiall worship of God , the fearefull blasphemyes , and swearing in houses and streets , and the dishonour of Superiours , the pride , cruelty , fornications , adulteries , drunkennesse , couetousnesse , vsuries , and other like abominations . O be hould and pitty the woefull and lamentable state of our Church in these thinges ! And thus much of the state of the vulgar and common sort of Protestants , in what kind of vertue and perfection , this their new Ghospell hath trayned them vp for their deuotion , life , and manners , euen in the first and purest tyme of it . For the Clergy , the lampes & conductours of the rest , what , and of what note hath beene their life and conuersation in generall both in England and Germany , I will for England ( to auoid both offence and tediousnesse ) referre the Reader desirous to know thē to the Owles Almanack , made by the Puritans against the Bishops , and to the Volume of Saints , Pasquill vnto Martin iunior , and Pasquill and Marphorius , made by Protestants against Puritans , all printed the yeare 1589. in Queene Elizabeths raigne ; and to Doctour Sutcliffes answere to a libell supplicatory , where the Puritans are described for their pride , malice , cruelty , couetousnesse , vsury gluttony , and their chamber cheere , and other good matters kept for a rare banquet , too shamefull , and eu●dently appearing . All conuincing what is their life and manners , and all practised insteed of fasting and other godly exercise . And for Germany I wil only bring two or three witnesses for the generall , to wit Wolfphangus Musculus who , speaking of their Clergy , saith ; If they do any thing vpright & iust , they do it not sincerly with any good intention , but obiter , & by the way , as altogeather neglecting that which is to be done by faithful ministers , and are so farre from bringing in errours and superstition of doctrine as formerly was done , that they do by their manners giue occasion to the people to fall into an indifferency of religion and Epicurisme , and into such a neglect of all religion , that none neede to feare that by the example of the ministery men should become hypocrites , superstitious worshippers of Images , and Iustice-workers , for from this care they do aboundantly deliuer themselues , and others . Ioan ▪ Wigandus saith , that of the ministers many are parasites and flatterers , who fraudulently excuse the sinnes of great men , and kindle coales of mischiefe by which Polititians do thrust out sincere preachers out of their places , and make them suffer more then women in childbed . Paulus Eberus saith of them , that if we looke vpon the Euangelicall Doctours , we shall find that some moued with vaine glory , others with enuious zeale , others with contentions , others with other vices , do all destroy more with their wicked life , then they build with their true doctrine . Which shall suffice for the generality of the ministery . For particular persons , obseruing that we speake not of the declining and worst age of their Church , but of the reforming and best time , nor of the vulgar sort of ministers , but of their prime men and principall pillars among their reforming ministers ; nor out of our writers , but out of their owne accusation and condemnation of themselues ; we will in generall looke into the life of some of their principall founders of their Religion , and se what life and manners in them their new doctrine did togeather with their reformation beget & nourish . Al which was ominously foreshewed by prodigious monsters , first of a calfe at Friburge in Misnia with a head like to a monkes hood , then of a hogge at Hall in Saxony with a shauen crowne like a priest ; both in the yeare before that Luther cast of his habit , and afterwards incestuously conioyned himselfe with one of the nine Nunnes which Koppen enticed out of the Monastery of Nimpsen in Saxony . And first for Luther that man of God , that light of the world , that third Elias , that first Euangelist , & next to Christ & S. Paul , with much more before noted ( as they call him , ) if we cōsider his life and doctrine what it was while he belieued and imbraced the Catholicke faith , and compare it with the same what it was after he made his reformation , we shall clearly perceaue the fruit and effect of this their new Ghospel for life & manners . And first for his life before his reuolt he confesseth himselfe , and it is confessed by his owne followers , that He liued in his Monastery punishing his body with watching , fasting , & prayer (a) . That he honoured the Pope of meere conscience . That he kept chastity , pouerty , & obedience (b) . Whatsoeuer he did , he did it with a simple heart , of good zeale , for the glory of God , fearing grieuously the last day , and desirous to be saued , from the bottome of his heart (c) . Which are his owne words . But after he inuented his libertine Ghospell , he confesseth himselfe , and the same is confessed by his followers . 1. For lust and sensuality , that He esteemed nothing more sweet or louing vpon the earth then the loue of a woman if a man can get it (d) . That it was no more in his power to be without a woman then to be a man , that the act of the flash is as necessary , and more necessary , & no more to be stayed or omitted then to eat , drinke , sleepe , purge , make cleane the nose (e) &c. Wherupon he confesseth that , I am burned with the great flame of my vntamed flesh , I who ought to be feruent in spirit am feruent in the flesh , in lust , sloth &c. Eight dayes are now past wherin I neither write , pray , nor study , being vexed partly with the temptation of the flesh , partly with other troubles . But (f) saith he ) it sufficeth me to know the glory of the riches of God , and of the lambe which taketh away the sinnes of the world , from him sinne cannot draw vs although we should commit fornication , or kill a thousand times a day . Vpon which his lust , neither respecting his vow made to God of chastity , which made it a sinne to commit any act of carnality , nor the Imperiall law which made it losse of ones head ; nor the shame of the world , at which all wondred & many were ashamed & scandalized , (g) nor the calamities of the time in which by the insurrection of the Boores , or common people , (h) incited by him were killed to the number of one thousand , and all Germany was in misery : but impatient of staying so much as one night , he secretly at night , hauing present only Pomeran the Priest , Luke the Painter , and Apell●s the Lawyer , (i) without any communication with his friends , the yeare 1525. coupled himselfe to one of the Runagate Nunnes , enticed out of Nympsen by Leonard Koppen , Katherine Bor● by name , a beautifull yonge woman of 26. yeares of age , who within few dayes after the mariage , as Erasmus sayth , was deliuered of a child , and so , as one fayth of him , Luther was yesterday a Monke , to day a Bridgroome to morrow a Husband , and the next a Father . Which was the first fruit , and one of the principall motiues of Luthers Reformation . But let vs heare his Examen of his owne conscience , & his confession of himselfe : VVhat , sayth he , (a) haue I done all this day ? Two houres cacaui ( too beastly to be englished ) three houres I eat , and fower houres I was idle . Againe , (b) VVe eat till death ▪ we drinke till death ▪ we eat and drinke till we be poore , and go to hell , cacamus ad mortem . (c) I sit heere senselesse and stupid in idlenesse , praying little , mourning nothing at al for the Church . And laughing at the folly of S. Hierome , Benedict , Bernard and Francis , who labouring to represse the heat of the flesh by praying , fasting & afflicting their bodyes , he sayth , (d) He hath a more easy and ready way , so that a wench be not wanting , that is , to haue a wench alwayes in the house , which is the most present remedy for that disease , and she as a woman ought to help a friend in that case . And least he should be thought to do otherwise thē he taught , his doctrine was according to his practise ; for he taught , That to increase and multiply is not a precept , but more then a precept , which is not in our power to slippe or omit : but more necessary then to eat , drinke , purge and sleep ▪ That , (e) the Husband shal say to his wife , if thou wilt not come , let the maid or another come , and if that will not suffice , dismisse Vas●hi and admit He●ter . That (f) As God , seuerely prohibited ●o kill , & not commit adultery , so much more did he command to marry . For prayer and deuotion , he taught , That (g) God hath promised to heare our prayers , therefore after thou hast prayed once or twice , thou must belieue thou art heard , and so must pray no more , least thou tempt God , and abuse his patience in hearing thee . And writing to a noble man , he affirmes , that , (h) If we pray often for the same thing , we shew little trust in God ; and so with our incredulous prayer we more & more offend God ; for to aske the same thing often it nothing els but to conceaue that before we were not heard , & so do pray against the promises of God. Therefore (i) we must not vse many words with God , but let such short prayers as these suffice , Help vs , O God. Father haue mercy on vs. &c. That (k) Papists do foolishly teach men to pray , fast , and do pennance ; only say thou , that all thou canst do , is nothing , and this is to prepare the way for God , though in the meane tyme thou do nothing but drinke Malmesy and walke vpon Roses , and pray not word at all . That , when (l) thou prayest whether it be standing or kneeling , say boldly ; Lord , I aske that thou heare me , and I will that thou graunt my request , and so it must , and shal be ; and thus pray and no otherwise , or els say thou , I will neither pray to thee , nor haue thee prayed vnto . And lastly , that No (m) man can say , Our Father , except he ioyne with it curses and execrations ; for Our Father , is not well sayd without banninges and cursings . This was Luthers doctrine , and manner of Prayer . For other good workes , and good life , and both for obligation & practise of them , he taught , 1. That , (n) only faith doth iustify , and only that fayth , which includes not , not hath annexed Charity . That (o) Only fayth is necessary to make vs iust , all other thinges being free , and neither commanded nor forbidden . That (p) Fayth except it be without any the least good workes doth not iustify , yea is no fayth . 2. For good workes , that (q) This shal be a rule for vnderstanding of Scripture , that wheresoeuer the Scripture doth commaund to do goods workes , it is to be vnderstood to prohibit them . That , (r) though the Papists bring heapes of Scripture , as commending good workes , yet I care not for them , though they bring more ; Thou Papist art very bragge with thy good works and scripture , yet scripture is a seruant to Christ , therefore it moues me nothing . Rely thou vpon the seruant , I will rely vpon the Maister and Lord of Scripture : to him I yield , and I know that he will not lye , nor lead me into errour . I will rather adhere to him , then for all scripture to be altered a hairs breadth from my opinion . 3. For the ten Commandements . (s) That therefore the ten Commandments do not belong to vs Christians , but only to Iewes , which is proued out of the Text , speaking to them whome it brought out of Aegypt , who were Iewes , not Christians . (t) VVe will not admit that any the least precept of Moyses be imposed vpon vs. (u) Therefore looke that Moyses withall his law be sent packing , in malam rem , with a mischiefe , & that thou be not moued with any terrour of him , but hould him suspected for an heretick , cursed and damned , and worse then the Pope , or the Diuell . 4. Therfore to conclude vp all , for sinne he sayth , (w) That true and right Saints must be subiect to great and heinous sinnes ▪ and to continue such , as they may not be ashamed to pray , Forgiue vs our sinnes . That (x) if it be true grace , let it bring true , not feined sinne , God saues not feined sinners : be a sinner and sinne stoutly , but be more strong in fayth , and reioyce in Christ . It sufficeth vs to know the Lambe , from him no sinne can draw vs though we sinne , & commit fornication or murder a thousand tymes in one day . That , (y) a Christian is so rich , that though he would yet he cannot be damned by any so great sinnes , except he will not belieue , for no sinnes can damne him ●ut infidelity . And that himselfe did confesse to his Ghostly Father D. Staupitius , not sins of women , but solid and horrible heinous offences (z) . This was the doctrine , & accordingly the practise of this Saint , Prophet , Elias Euangelist , Angel , and light of the world , the singular , eminent , & euer-admired organ of the holy Ghost , endewed with so great piety & gifts , and such a Doctour and interpreter of scripture , as was not in the world since the Apostles , as before he is by his followers extolled . All which sayings of Luther are in these words cited by Gaspar Scioppius who was a long time a follower and professour of Luthers doctrine . Secondly , For his malice and enuy not only against the Pope and Catholiks , which was implacable ; but also against the Sacramentaries his brethren & fellow reformers , whose part our english Protestants follow , he is so farre charged by the Zuinglians with breach of all Christian charity towards them ▪ that he not only cals them hereticks , damnable and execrable fectaries , alienated from the Church of Christ , whom he curses , & all concord with them , and refuses to haue any familiarity by word or writing ▪ or spe●ch with them , or any of them for euer : but also saith , they are insatanized , supersatanized , and persatanized , in whose mouth sathan is infused , perfused , and transfused . For which saith Zuinglius of him , Sathan doth endeauour wholy to possesse him . And , say the Tigurins , his booke is full of Diuels , immodest railings , anger and rage . And say our english Protestāts he doth breake all Christian modesty , (a) and is far beyond the bounds of Charity (b) . 3. For his pride and vaine insulting ouer all sorts of Princes , prelates , and opposers of him , it is apparent not only by his intemperate writings against Henry the 8. of England , and all the princes of Germany ; but also by the plaine accusation of his owne brethren . 1. By the Tigurins (c) who expresly con●emne him for pertinacy , & too much insolency . 2. By Oeco●●mpadius (d) who accuseth him of being puffed vp with pride and arrogancy , that he is in danger to be seduced by Sathan . 3 By Conradus Regius , who laies to his charge such pride by which he doth extoll himselfe in his writings , that God for it tooke frō him his true spirit , and in place of it gaue him a proud , angry , and lying spirit . And to confirme all this , he was so arrogant and impudent that beyond all ciuility he arrogantly auouches of himselfe , that he is such a one as the world hath not had these many ages . That himselfe is the only mortall man whom Satan foresaw to be hurtfull to him . That , Since the Apostles time no Doctour , or writer hath so excellently and cleerly confirmed , instructed and comforted the consciences of the secular states , as I haue done , by the singular grace of God. This certainly I know , that neither Austine , nor Ambrose , who are yet in this matter the best , are equall to me heerein . That , The Ghospell is so copiously preached by vs , that truly in the Apostles time it was not so cleare . Wherupon euen Caluin himselfe charges him to be subiect to great vices , and wishes that he had beene more carefull in acknowledging them . And himselfe confesseth of himselfe , that his profession is not of manners but doctrine . wishing that he were remoued from the office of preaching , because his manners and life did not answer to his profession . Which may suffice for a conuincing example to shew what fruit this new doctrine and priuat spirit brought forth in the first founder of it . For Caluin , Beza , Zuinglius , and others the chiefe supporters of this doctrine & new Religion , it might suffice to shew their life & disposition for manners , to remember that they were most of them , if not all , either Religious men tyed by vow to Pouerty , Obedience , and Chastity ; or els at the least Priests in holy Orders obliged to Chastity , and yet euery one of them by the liberty of their Ghospell offered vp , as the first fruits of it , themselues by execrable apostacy to all lust and sensuality in incestuous copulation , either with like professed Nunnes , or other women subuerted and enticed by them . Wherupon as Luther an Augustine Frier began the dance , so his schollers Bucer a Dominican , Pe●er Martyr a Canon regular , & Bernardinus Ochinus a Franciscan followed & ioyned themselues with professed Nunnes ; and with them Oecolampadius a Brigittan Monke , Pelican and Spanberge Franciscans , Knox a Frier , Zuinglius and Caluin Priests , Carolostadius an Arch-deacon , Gebardus an Archbishop of Colen , and Vergerius a Cardinall chose for their mates other women . In like manner in England Cranmer , and Sands of Canterbury & Yorke both Priests , and Archbishops , Hooper of Worcester , Barlow of Chicester , Downhan of Westchester , Scory of Hereford , Barkely of Bath and Wels , Couerdale of Excester , all Bishops ; Bale in Ireland , Bucer at C●mbridge , and Martyr at Oxford , with infinit more , all Monkes and Religious , did al of them plante and disperse the new Ghospells doctrine through England by apostating from their vowed chastity to sensuall copulation , vnder the title of mariage , with wantons like themselues . This in generall , I say , may suffice to discerne the fruit of this new Ghospell what it brought forth for sanctity and holinesse of life , and by what bellowes it was first blowen and kindled in the Professors of it . He that is desirous to see more particulers of Zuinglius , and his fellow Ministers of Zurich , Leo , Iude , Erasmus , Fabricius , and eight other , how they demanded of the Bishop of Constance liberty of marrying wiues , for the satisfying ( to vse their owne wordes ) of their lust , in which they spent ( say they ) their whole thoughts and meditation to satisfy their burning desires of the flesh ; for which ( they confesse ) they are made infamous before the congregations haue committed many thinges vnseemely , and the people by the example of them are scandalized , and speake ill of them . Who would see of Caluin , what fine bread made of fine flower & rose-water mixed with sugar , cynamon , Anizseeds , and other spices made for him alone , he alwayes eat , & had carryed with him wheresoeuer he dyned ; what notorious sinnes he is conuinced and accused off , euen by Protestants themselues , namely by Conrandus Schusselburg a learned superintendent of Rauespurge , & the neighbour Churches in Germany , who record to the view of all the world with constant asseueration thereof ( to omit Catholike witnesses ) his Sodomiticall lust , for which he was burned publickly by the Magistrates of Noyon in France on the shoulder with a hoat iron , and his other notorious vices and lasciuiousnes , and withall what a notorious death he dyed , not only stincking with loathsome vlcers , wormes , and lice in his members ; but also swearing , cursing , blaspheming despairing , and calling vpon the Diuell . Who desires to read of Beza , how shamefully he kept Andebertus a boy , as another Ganamed , and Claudia de Mossa called by him Candida , as a strumpet , foure yeares , and then fled with her for infamy to Geneua , where he married her , and writ shamefull Epigrammes in comparing his loue to them both ; & how being 69. years old , presently vpon her death he marryed another yonge widdow Katherine . All which are witnessed of him by Hessufius a Protestant & famous Lutheran , togeather with the aforesayd Schusselburge , who in generall besids the former particulers accuse him to haue liued like a Hogge in the durt of all obscene lasciuiousnesse , flagitious lust , and wicked whoordome and adultery , celebrated to his owne shame by his owne writings . Who desires to read of Iacobus Andreas as famous a Lutheran in Germany , for he was Chancelour of the Vniuersity of Tubinge , as Caluin was at Geneua , it is diuulged by his owne fellows Seleucerus , Musculus & Hospinian , to haue neuer byn seen so much as to say the Lords prayer , neither frō bed nor to bed , nor to haue shewne any sparkle of godlines , but great lightnesse in his wordes , deedes , and counsels ; to haue beene guilty of most heynous couetousnesse , adultery , sacriledge , robbing the poore , whose goods he carryed from Misnia & Saxony to Tubinge ; to haue been without any conscience or Religion at all ; and to haue had no other God but Mammon & Bacchus . Who , I say , wil see these at large and more of them , and of many other prime Euangelicall founders ( to omit Cranmer his carrying his wench in his trunke , Knoxk his marrying his step-mother , and other marrying many wiues , some hauing to the number often or twelue aliue ) let him read the liues of these , and other such like prime Protestants collected by Brereley , out of their own Authours , and the Protestants Apology made by the same Authour . By all which it will euidently appeare , that as the foresayd Protestant doctrine doth blow the bellowes , and plaine the way to this licentious liberty , and loosnesse of Epicurean life and manners ; so the followers of it , induced by the same , did as notoriously practise and follow the same ; so that their life was made agreable to their doctrine , and both did run on ioyntly togeather in all wicked and abominable practise of all sinne and iniquity . To which , as contrary , if we oppose the good life of Catholiks , as a marke of their fayth and Religion , confessed euen by our aduersaries , the one will better illustrate the other . Of our first Apostles of England , S. Augustine , Mellitus , Iustus , and Iohn , it is confessed by Hollinshead , that after they were receaued into Canterbury , they began to follow the trade of life which the Apostles vsed , exercising themselues in continuall prayer , watching , and preaching , despising all wordly thinges , liuing in all points , according to the doctrine which they set forth . And the like is reported by Stow , Godwin , and others . And both Godwin & Fox mention and confesse diuers miracles wrought by S. Augustine , through Gods hand . All contrary to the former life of Luther . Of S. Dominike , S. Francis , S. Bernard , and other such like founders of Religious orders , it is confessed by Tindall , That they were holy men . By Melancthon , that they vsed obedience , pouerty and chastity , without any sinne or impiety . By Pantaleon , That they were men famous for learning and holynesse . By Fox , of S. Francis , that he cast away all thinges from him , outwardly chastised himselfe , and liued so austerely , that he couered his body with ice and snow , called pouerty his Lady , and was so desirous of Martyrdome , that he went into Syria , to the Soldan to seeke it . All farre different from the life of the first Protestant Reformers . Of S. Francis Xauerius a Iesuit , and an Apostle of India , it is confessed by M. Richard Hackluite , That he was a godly Professour and painefull Doctour of the Indian Nation in matters concerning Religion . That , after great labours , iniuries and calamities suffered with much patience , he departed , indued with all spirituall blessinges , out of this life the yeare 1552. after many thousands were by him brought to the knowledge of Christ. Of this holy man his particuler vertues , and wonderfull workes in that Religion , all the later Histories of the Indian regions are full . And by another Protestant it is sayd , that the (a) King of Portugall , hearing of the great miracles he wrought , sent his commission to his Viceroy there , dated in Aprill anno 1556. to take examination thereof by oath . VVherupon (b) by certificate it was found that he had cured miraculously the Dumbe , the Lame , the Deafe , and with his word healed the Sicke , and (c) raised sundry dead persons to life . That (d) after his death they found his body , not only vnconsumed , but also yielding forth fragrant smels , from whence they carryed it to Goa , and placed it there in the Church of S. Paul , where yet to this day it remaineth free from corruption : of which are witnesses all the inhabitants of that Citty , and Trauellers thither . And by M. Abraham Hartwell in his booke dedicated to the Bishop of Canterbury his Lord & Maister , saith , That it is reported , how in the discouery of the kingdome of Congo the yeare 1587. by Odoardo Lopez , that great and vndoubted m●racls were shewed by God , in the presence of a whole army . Of which the Authour sayth , that though this conuersion of Cōgo was accomplished by Massing Priests , & after the Romish māner , yet this action , which tendeth to the glory of God , shall it be concealed and not committed to memory , because it was performed by Popish Priests and Popish meanes ? God forbid . Let the Germans shew any such in the peruersion of Germany to Protestancy . Of the Catholike people of ancient tyme , it is confessed by the Centurists , that although in this age ( they speake of the seauen hundred yeares after Christ ) the worship of God was darkened with mans traditions and superstition , yet the study to serue God and liue godly and iustly was not wanting to the miserable common people &c. they were so attentiue to their prayers , as they bestowed almost the whole day therein &c. they did exhibit to the Magistrate due obedience , they were most studious of amity , concord and society , so as they would easily remit iniuries , all of them were careful to spend their tyme in honest vocation and labour ; to the poore , and to strangers they were curteous and liberall , and in their iudgements , and contracts most true . Of the Catholike Prelates of ancient tyme in England he that desires to see their vertues commended , let him read M. Godwin , then Chaplain to the Lord Treasurer , now one of their new Bishops , and he shall find , giuen by him , rare and extraordinary comendations to the Bishops of England , as S. Dunstan , Elphege , Lanfranke , Anselme , Rodulph Baldwine , Hubert VValter , S. Edmund , Iohn Peckam , Robert Winchelsey , Iohn Stratford , Thomas Bradwardine , Simon Sudbury , S. Hugh , Hugh Pateshall , Paulinus , Geffrey Plantagenet , Richard Scroope , Richard Poore , Richard Fox , Iohn Morton , Reginald Poole , Cuthbert Tonstall , and others . Whereas of our late Protestant Bishops he shall find little or no prayse , and yet the writer one of their own Bishops . Of the ancient common Catholike people of England , it is confessed by M Stubs , a great enemy to Papists , that for good workes who seeth not that heerin they are far beyond vs , and we far behind them : for example what memorable , & famous buildings , and what ancient Monuments haue they left to the world behind thē ? VVhat Churches , Chapels , and other houses of prayer did they erect , to the end the Religion and seruice of God might be continued ? Yea what Monasteries , Abbeyes , Priories , and other religious houses ? VVhat number of good Bridges did they make ? How many Almes houses , Hospitalls , and spittles did they found ? What high wayes ? VVhat pauements , and causies ? In summe , VVhat famous Colledges , Halles , and Vniuersities ? VVhat Schooles , and free schooles ? &c. Also . Is it not a shame vnto vs , that our fore-Fathers , liuing in the tymes of superstitions , &c. should notwithstanding so farre passe vs in good workes , that we may not be compared with thē in any small measure ? Of the late and present Catholiks generally of all Coūtryes Syr Edwin Sandes , that great Parlament-man sayth , that there are in great multitude on both sides ( Protestants and Catholikes ) ( for so there are vndoubtedly ) men vertuous and learned , fraught with the loue of God , and the truth , aboue all thinges men of memorable integrity of hart and affection whose liues are not deare to them , much lesse their labours to be spent for the good of Gods Church . And some side of a leafe afterwards , he further fayth : Let the Protestants looke with the eye of Charity vpon them ( of the Papacy ) as well as of seuerity , and they shall find some excellent orders of gouernement , some singular helpes for increase of godlines and deuotion , for the conquering of sinne , for the profi●ing in vertue ; and contrarywise in themselues , looking with a more single and lesse indulgent eye , they shall find there is no such absolute perfection in their doctrine and reformation &c. And he further sayth of the Catholike Clergy : (a) That in their sermons much matter , both of Fayth and piety is eloquently deliuered by men surely of wonderfull zeale and spirit . And (b) that all Countryes are full of the Iesuites bookes of prayer , and piety in their owne language , and wonderfull is the reputation , which redoundes thereby to their order . In so much as he (c) sayth of the late Pope Clement the eight : He is reputed to be a man of good calme disposition &c. deuout in his wayes , and thinkes without doubt , that he is in the right , he will weep very often , some conceaue vpon a weaknesse and tendernes of mind , habitued therein by custome ; others say vpon piety , and godly compassion ; at his Masses , at his pr●cessions , at his fixing vp of his Iubilies , his eyes are still watering , sometymes streaming with teares &c. He is an enemy to the licentious liues of the Fryars , to the pompe & secular brauery of Cardinals , &c. He is magnificall and cerimoniall in his outward comportment , in his priuate austere and humble . And concludeth there that he was a good man , a good Prince , and a good Prelate . Likewise M. Stubbes confesseth , that certainely to speake the truth , there is many tymes found , conscionabler and playner dealing among most of the Papists , then among many Protestants ; and if we looke narrowly into the ages past , we shall find more godlinesse , deuotion , and zeale ( though blind ) more loue one towardes another , more fidelity & faythfullnesse euery way in them , then is now to be found in vs. Now cōparing , as the fruit of their doctrine , the life and manners of the forecyted Protestants with the life and manners of the Catholikes , the ancient of the one with the ancient of the other , the moderne of the one with the moderne of the other , the founders of religion of the one with the founders of the other , the preachers and teachers of the one with the teachers of the other , the commō sort of the one with the common sort of the other , and discerning both by their fruites , whether are in their life more Christian , and are to Christiā doctrine more conformable , Inimici nostri sint Iudices , Our enemies ( whose authority , as before is confessed by themselues to be a most strong argument against themselues ) as they are witnesses of both , so let them be Iudges , of both . The Conclusion , comparing the priuate spirits doctrine , with the Catholike Churches doctrine , whether leads to the greater honour of God. SECT . IX . ONE thing remaines , for the accomplishing of this Chapter ( which is ( for satisfying of an vsuall & triuial ostentation of the Protestants , that they forsooth do more , in their religion , then we in ours , honour God & Iesus Christ ) to compare & pararell them and their priuate spirit with vs , and our Catholicke Churches spirit in the principal points of their and our doctrine , and therby to propose to the indifferent reader a generall view of both , wherby he may discerne how far they with their priuate spirit and doctrine do dishonour and derogate , 1. From God. 2. From Christ . 3. From Saints and Angels in heauen . 4. From holy Scripture . 5. Frō holy Church . 6. From Sacraments . 7. From man and his meanes to saluation ; which are faith , grace , iustification , good works , freewill , and the rest : In all which their doctrine is negatiue and detractiue in euery one . And on the contrary how we and our doctrine do honour , & attribut to the same God , and Christ , all worthy and due respect of veneration & honour in all , which as it is affirmatiue in it selfe , so it is honourable to God , and agreable to reason in all and euery particular point and opinion in controuersy . First , therfore for God , they dishonour and derogate , 1. From the blessed Trinity , in that ( as before ) some of them do deny the distinction of the three persons , some the vnity of one nature , some the consubstantiality of the Sonne with the Father , some the deity of the Sonne from the Father , as God of God , some the deity of the holy Ghost as God , some the prayer Holy Trinity one God haue mercy vpō vs. We with the ancient Church acknowledge three persons and one God , the second person God of God , and consubstantiall with the father , and the third person of the holy Ghost proceeding frō both the father & the sonne , & in them one holy Trinity , three persons and one God. 2. They and their spirit derogate from the mercy of God , in that , according to them , he is cruell and tyrannicall , in that he will not haue all saued , will not giue sufficient meanes to all to be saued , hath willed , appointed , and ordained millions of soules to be damned , and to sinne ▪ that for it he may damne them , and accordingly torment thē for that sinne which he himselfe willed , ordained , wrought , and compelled them vnto . We , and our Catholicke Church attribute honour to him and his mercy ; in that , according to vs , he would haue all saued , giues to all sufficient meanes to be saued , creates and ordaines all to be saued , wils not the death and damnation of any , nor doth damne any , but those who for their owne fault and sinne by themselues willingly committed against him , & his good will and goodnesse , do deserue ▪ 3. They & their spirit do derogate from Gods goodnesse , in that , according to them , he who is good & al good , yet is not pleased , pacifyed , worshipped , or delighted with good works : but doth will , ordaine , commande , compell , and necessitate bad works , and so is the authour of all euill , and all euill works in men , and doth esteeme & impute that which is wicked and sinfull in men for no sinne in them ; but accounts that which is bad good , & him that is wicked iust . We & our Catholik doctrine do attribute due honour to the same goodnesse of God ; in that , according to it , God hates , detests ▪ forbids , and punishes all sinne and sinfull actions , conuerts , sanctifies , purifies , and make cleane , pure , and iust all sinners by his grace duely disposing themselues , & so reputes them as they are become truely iust , in that God is delighted , pleased , pacified , and honoured by good workes which he doth will , command , and reward in man , who according to his will by his grace workes them . 4. They & their priuate spirit derogates from his iustice ; in that , according to their doctrine , he is short of iustice in rewarding none who deserue well , and do him seruice ; & exce●ds all iustice , in that he ordaines men to an eternall and intollerable paine who haue deserued none . 2. In that he punisheth them for that which he himselfe not only willed and commanded thē to do , but also wrought and effected in them . 3. In that he creats and dignifies them with his gifts & graces for that end that he may himselfe cruelly torture and torment them , and that in hell , for no other end but to shew his power & iustice ouer them . 4. In that he laies precepts vpon them which are impossible for them to performe , and commands them to abstaine from that which himselfe forces them to do , and wils them to practise that which he giues not power , freedome , or sufficient meanes to practise . We and our Catholicke doctrine , do honour and giue due respect to his Iustice , 1. In that , according to vs , he rewards all who deserue well , and punisheth none but those who deserue ill . 2. In that he punisheth all for their owne fault which they themselues committed , and none for that which himselfe willed . 3. In that he created all to be saued , and gaue them meanes sufficient to be saued , in which he shewed his mercy ; and punisheth with hell those who would not vse those meanes , in which he shewed his Iustice . 4. In that he gaue precepts , and made lawes easy , gaue meanes to performe them sufficient , & punisheth only those who willingly breake them . 5. They and their priuate spirit derogate from his omnipotency ; in that according to their doctrine , he is not able to place one body in two places in the B. Sacrament ; nor two bodies in one place in his natiuity , resurrection , and ascension , nor to draw a Cable rope or camell through a needles eye , nor by his absolut power to worke any more thē already he hath wrought . We and our Catholicke doctrine do attribut to his omnipotency , that he is able to do all the former , and what more he pleases to do , which is not either wicked , and so is against his goodnesse , or not contradictory , and so implies in it selfe an impossibility to be done . And in these do the Protestants & their spirit , by their doctrine , derogate from God and his Deity , from his goodnesse , his mercy , his Iustice , and his omnipotency , and impute to him wickednesse , cruelty , iniustice , and impotency . In all which we in our doctrine do the contrary . Secondly , for Christ our blessed Sauiour , they & their doctrin of the priuate spirit do dishonour him , & derogate , 1. From his felicity & beatitude in this life , denying him to be viator , and comprehensor , that is , enduring the paine and miseries of mortall men in his body , and enioying the felicity and blessednesse of glorious Saints in his soule . In which we do honour him , belieuing that from the first instant of his cōception , his soule had in his body the same blessednesse as now it enioyes in heauen by the perfect vision & fruition of God , though , by dispensation for our redemption , the same did not redound to the glory of his body till after his resurrection . 2. From his knowledge , they derogate and dishonour him , in making him ignorant and defectiue of knowledge in many things , and as a scholler to haue profited in his booke , and learning of sciences and trades as other children do . In which we giue him the honour to haue had all the treasures of knowledge and wisedome , to haue vnderstood all the perfection of all sciences and artes , and to haue perfectly conceiued all things past , present , or to come , by a diuine infused knowledge from the first instant of his conception in his mothers wombe . Thirdly , From his primacy , and supremacy ouer his Church , they derogate and dishonour him , in that they deny him , as a man sensible and visible , to haue beene the head & foundation of his Church , and to haue had any perpetual & visible monarchy of the same heere on earth . In which we honour him , belieuing that as man he is the head of men , of the Church , and of the visible monarchy of the Church which he established for euer , and that euery knee ought to bow downe and adore him as the Sauior of it , and that he hath dominion ouer all by his death and resurrection , and did also leaue a visible Vicegerent after him , by whom we should be gouerned visibly , as by himselfe inuisibly . Fourthly , from his authority to make lawes and iudge vs , they derogat and dishonour him , in that they take from him al power to make any lawes , or giue any precepts of true faith , morall life , or good manners for our instruction & direction ; & deny him as a iudge , to haue exercised any iudgment vpon the liuing and faithfull . In which we giue him the honour to haue beene our law maker , our iudge , and to haue made a new law of grace ( abrogating the old of Moyses ) and in it to haue prescribed vnto vs obedience to his precepts of faith and good life . Fiftly , From his Sanctity they derogatiue much , and dishonour him greatly ; in that they call him truly and properly a sinner , a great sinner , and the greatest sinner of all sinners ; who sinned in discurtesy to his mother , in inconsideration in his actions , in forgetfulnesse of his function , in staggering betweene praising and blaspheming God ▪ betweene hope and despaire , and in renouncing his saluation , for which he was execrable to God , & cursed with the damned , being in all these properly a sinner , and not only by the imputation of our sinnes to him , as in their opinion euen man is iust by imputation of his iustice to him , and so as truly sinfull as euer any man was iust . All which we abhorre as blasphemy , belieuing that he suffered paines , and payed therby the price of our redemption , but was innocent , impolluted , immaculate , incontaminat , and segregated from all sinners and sinfull actions , bearing the punishment of our sinne in his body , but being free from all imputation of the guilt of sinne in his soule . Sixtly , From his redemption of mankind they derogate and dishonour him . 1. In that they deny the vertue of his death , passion , and precious blood to haue been any full satisfaction or redemption of mankind , but only the in●ernal paines and suffering in his soule to haue been accepted as sufficient . 2. In that they deny the vniuersality and fulnesse of his redemption to haue been offered for all men , affirming him to haue dyed only for the elect , and to haue offered or left no meanes of redemption for the wicked and reprobat . 3. In that they deny the effect and efficacy of the same to haue extended to the abolishing and washing away of sinne , & to the inward sanctification of the soule by any inward and inherent grace and iustice , which should enable it to keep the commandments of God , and to auoid mortal offence against God. In all which we honour him and his redemption , in that , 1. We belieue and professe that his pretious bloud shed vpon the crosse , and his death and passion offered vp to God , was a full price , & a perfect redemption from sinne . 2. That the same was a full price , satisfaction , and redemption for all the sinnes of all persons in all the world . 3. That the same purchased ( of his part ) for all sinners not only are imputatiue but also an inherent and reall iustification by grace , which doth wash away the deformity of sinne , cure the infirmity of the soule , and giue strength to the keeping of Gods commandements , and to the auoiding of sinne , and so the meriting of a reward at Gods handes . Seauenthly , from his merit and satisfaction they derogate , and dishonour him , in that they deny him to haue by it satisfyed the iustice of God for any one sinne , or to haue merited to himselfe his owne exaltation to glory , or to our workes either any satisfaction for sinne , or any merit of reward by his grace . In all which we honour the same , belieuing that he fully in iustice satisfyed , and offered to God a sufficient price for our sinnes , that he merited for himselfe & his owne body the glory of his Resurrection : and to vs not only for our sinnes a full price and satisfaction , but also for our good works a vertue by grace both to satisfy in some sort for sinne , and to merit a reward of more grace present , and glory to come . Eightly , about his corporall death and passion , they shamefully derogate and dishonour him , in that they affirme he suffered both in body and soule the paines & torments of Hell , the death of the soule , the separation of the soule from God , the same infernall and eternall paines which the very Diuells and damned do suffer for the tyme , and which in rigour are due to sinne and all sinners , which except he had suffered , he had not satisfyed for vs , nor sufficiently redeemed vs. In all which we doe so honour his life and death , that we attribute to euery action and passion of his , euen to the least drop of his bloud , that worth and valew , arysing of the dignity of his diuine person , that it was sufficient to haue satisfyed for an infinit world of sinnes ; and that the paines he suffered were only in the sensible and inferiour part of the soule and body , but did not touch the superiour part of his soule ; that they were voluntarily sustained and offerred vp to God for vs , and accepted by God for vs , as being of more dignity , then the offence of all our sinnes was of indignity ; whereby he neither suffered , nor needed to suffer , nor could in the dignity of his person suffer any paines ot hell , but by the paines of the Crosse ( though by the tendernes of his coplexion more painefull to him then to any other ) did pay a sufficient price , make a full attonement , offer a perfect satisfaction , and performe the part of a complete Redeemer and Sauiour for all mankind ▪ and the sinnes of all men . Ninthly , in the certainty of his saluation , they blasphemously derogate from him , and dishonour him more then themselues , in that they affirme euery one of themselues to be infallibly certaine of his saluation , and more certaine by his speciall faith of it , then by his generall faith of the B. Trinity , or incarnation of Christ ; and yet that our B. Sauiour was fearfull , doubtfull , wauering , and vncertaine of his saluation , did strugle with the horrour of death , feared to be absorpt vp of eternall death , was tormented with the anxiety of Gods wrath and indignation , and that more then any man euer was , or could be ; in which his horrour and desolation consists the summe of their consolation , as their owne words more fully before related do expresse . In all which we do so far honour him that we affirme and belieue that the pain●s he suffered , he willingly offered vp to God for vs , that he was sure and secure that God his father did alwayes heare him , alwayes loue him , alwayes assist him , alwayes comfort him , that no feare , doubt , wauering , or perturbation did , or could euer enter into his will or vnderstanding , yea that all that time of his passion his soule had the perfect vision and fruition of God , and only his sensible partes endured those paines and torments of the crosse . Tenthly , As for his descending into hell they derogate from it , and dishonour him , in that they affirme he descended either only to the graue in body , or also to the lower hell in soule to suffer the paines of it , either before his death on the crosse , or after it in hell ; but not to haue freed the Patriarchs from Limbus by the presence of his soule there . We honour it in belieuing that he descended in soule further then to the graue ( to which he only descended in body , ) but not so far as to suffer the paines of hell in soule , but only to the Limbus patrum where he gaue the Patriarches there detained present liberty & fruition of eternall hapinesse , & afterwards carried them with him to the place of glory , and so triumphed ouer hell , & led aptiuity Ccaptiue . Eleuenthly , From his resurrection and ascension they derogate , and dishonour him both by denying him the subtility or penetration of his body , wherby he was able to passe through either the stone of the sepulcher at his resurrection , or the dores of the house at his entrance to his disciples , or the hardnesse of the heauens at his ascension ; all which they wil haue either dissolued , or opened , or diuided . We honour & attribut more dignity to the same , belieuing that by the gift of subtility or penetratiō his body did pierce & passe through the stone , the dores , and the heauens at his resurrection and ascension ( as it did also his Mothers wombe at his natiuity ) with out any diuision , dissolution , or detriment to the nature of either the one or the other ; in which also he shewed his subtility , and consequently his impassibility , or immortality . Twefthly , From his adoration , and inuocation by vs as he is now in heauen , they derogate , and dishonour him in affirming that , as man , he is not to be adored or inuocated by vs. We honour him as man so far that we bow downe at the name of Iesus , praying to him with the blind man , & the Cananean , saying , Sonne of Dauid haue mercy on vs (a) . And fall down with the (b) Sages , & (c) the womē & adore him ▪ In al which and many more , as they by their priuate spirit & the doctrine of it , do derogate & take from Christ his honour , his power , his goodnesse , his beatitude , his knowledge , his sanctity , his certainty of saluation , his adoration , and the vertue and power of his passion , redemption , resurrection , & ascension ; so do we in our Catholike doctrine attribute to same due honour and dignity ; & so both in our doctrine & practise giue more honour , praise , power , and glory to God and to Iesus Christ , then they do either in doctrine or practise . Thirdly ▪ For the Saints and blessed soules in heauen , they dishonour them , and take from them . 1. Their state of beatitude , affirming as Luther (a) and Caluin do , that they yet sleepe , and neither know what we do , nor yet enioy any present glory and beatitude till the day of Iudgment . 2. Their perfection of Sanctity , in affirming , as Caluin (b) doth both of Angels and Saints , that their obedience is imperfect , that their iustice is defectiue , and doth not satisfy God , that their works require pardon , and that in them is folly , vanity and frailty . 3. Their power of doing miracles by the gift of God , which (c) Beza , Piscator , Vrsinus , and Perkins ●hould to be a vertue proper only to God , not communicated to any creature man or Saint . 4. Their difference and degree or honour ; affirming that all are equall in glory , beatitude , and reward , and that no lawrels or crownes of accidentall beatitude are due to Martyrs , Confessours , or Virgins . 5. Their respect and esteeme with God , denying that God doth either apply in any sort their merits to vs , or doth help and respect vs for their prayers . 6. Their knowledge of vs , and our affaires on earth ; denying that they heare , vnderstand , or know vs , or any thing we do heere on earth . 7. Their charity towardes vs ; affirming they neither at our intercessious sollicite , or pray to God for vs , nor offer vp any petitions , and miseries of ours to God. 8. Their honour , and inuocation by vs ; denying it to be lawfull to worship them , to honour thē , to inuocate them , or so much as , saith Luther , to imitate and follow their example . 9. The custody and ●uition of Angels ouer vs , and their hierarchies and orders in heauen ; denying or at least doubting of the custody of our Angell guardian , & the difference of al Hierarchies and orders among Angels . In al which we and our doctrine on the contrary , do attribute to them perfect and present beatitude in their soules , complete obedience in their performing the will of God , vpright Sanctity in all their actions , extraordinary power in working miracles , notable difference of degrees of glory , eminent knowledge in vnderstanding our prayers , excellent charity in making intercession for vs , and due honour and veneration in giuing them adoration , inuocation , and imitation , befitting both the Saints for their prayers for vs , and the Angels for their custody of vs. Fourthly , For the word of God , they abuse it & take , 1. From i● , one first and principall part of it , to wit , all the vnwritten word , or which is diuine , vnwritten tradition . 2. From the written word , they chop and cut off from the old Testament fourteene peeces or partes , and some of them from the new Testament , seauen whole bookes from the Canon of scripture . 3. For the translation of scripture , they reiect the ancient , and follow euery nation , euery congregation , and euery person a new translation which best pleases them , & therby leaue no certainty of the verity of any . 4. For the sense of scripture , they contemne that which the spirit of God did inspire to the ancient Fathers , Councels , & Church , and follow that which euery mans priuate spirit suggests , and therby follow not the meaning of the spirit of God , but that of their owne spirit . 5. For their faith grounded vpon scripture , they belieue only those points which their spirit finds in that part , translation , and sense which they chose ; and therby make an vncertaine , imperfect , & mained kind of faith and religion . 6. For their Iudge and meanes to try which is scripture , and which is true sense of it , they admit not any infallible Iudgment either of Church , or of Coūcels , or of Pastours ; but leaue to euery man to choose himself what he will belieue , & to iudge and follow whom he pleases in his beliefe ; wherby they can haue neither any vnity in faith , not any certainty of scripture , of scripture sense . We in our doctrine do admit for the word of God , not only that which was written in paper , but also that which was deliuered in preaching by the Apostles . We receiue , without any addition or diminution , that Canon which the auncient Church twelue hundred yeares ago receiued ; that translation which for as many ages hath been approued ; that sense which the auncient Fathers , Councells , and Church euer since Christ allowed ; that Iudge which hath an infallible warrant from God to iudge truly and impartially of the Canon , the text , the translation , the sense , all whatsoeuer is doubtfull . And all our practise is to follow the spirit of God speaking in the auncient Fathers , Councels , & Church , by which we are secure from errour or falshood about the scripture , and sense of it . Fifthly , For the Church of God , they with their priuate spirit dishonor it and derogate from it . 1. From the power and authority of it , as not hauing , according to them , any visible head and gouernour assisted with the holy Ghost to direct and gouerne it , and to iudge of all causes and controuersies in it , and so make it headlesse and vngouerned . We honour it in acknowledging it to be a visible and perpetuall Monarchy , with a setled and spirituall both Gouernour and gouernement , hauing in it an infallible authority to iudge , and decide all causes and controuersies . 2. They derogate from the visibility , perpetuity , and infallibility of the same , making it not only subiect to errour and corruption ; but to haue erred and perished , or at least become inuisible for many ages . We honour it , in belieuing that it cannot erre , faile , perish , become inuisible , or be corrupted in fayth , but that it is the piller of truth , against which , assisted by the holy Ghost the gates and power of hell and heresy cannot preuaile . 3. They derogate from the vnity , sanctity , vniuersality , and succession of the same , as notes and markes to distinguish it from all other congregations , which they reiect , and admit not . We reuerence and respect it as one , holy , Catholike and Apostlike Church , which no other congregation is , or can be . 4. They derogate from the vncontrollable authority & stability of the decrees of Councells , and from the infallible testimony of the vnanime consent of the Fathers & Doctors of the Church , both which they at their pleasure censure & condemne . We receaue , imbrace , and follow them as guids and directours to truth , and as witnesses and testimonies of truth ; belieuing that which they belieue , and reiecting that which they before reiected . 5. They derogate from the splendour and beauty of the Church in the state of Prelates , in the single life of the Clergy , in the retirednesse of the Religious persons , in the ornaments of the Churches , and in the variety of so many orders and professions , all which they reiect & condemne as needlesse or superstitious . We reuerence and honour the same , as tending to the externall honour of God , and the magnificence of his Church , thereby making the Church beautifull as the Moone , elect as the Sunne , & wel ordered as an Army of men . And to cōclude , they make the Church the mystery of iniquity , a whore , a harlot , and a strumpet , the whore of Babylon , drunken with al abominable filth of superstition , and abomination of idolatry and antichristianity , with which she hath made all the Christian world , all Kinges and Emperours , and that not for one or two ages , but for seauen , on ten , or twelue , or fourteene ages ( according to diuers opinions ) drunke with the same cup of superstition , abomination , idolatry , and antichristianity , and make it a body consisting of persons , whoeuen the best , and purest , are in all partes , and in euery action stayned , impure , sinnefull , vniust and wicked . We doe belieue & confesse it to be the kingdome , the citty , the house of God , the spouse of Christ , the temple of the holy Ghost , the pillar of truth which Christ hath purchased & washed with his precious bloud , made immaculate , incontaminate , and vnspotted , pure , holy , and perfect before him , which no errour of superstition or idolatry can possesse , no power of Pagans , or Heretikes , or Schismatikes or other , wicked Christians can suppresse , no subtilty of heresy , infidelity , or Sathan himselfe can supplant , destroy , or extinguish . Sixhtly , For the sacraments , they from the number of seauen do curtaile fiue , and leaue only two , and from these two they take away from the one , that is baptisme , 1. The effect and vertue , making it only a signe or seale , no cause or instrument of grace , and of no more vertue then the baptisme of S. Iohn Baptist .. 2. They take away all necessity of it , making it not needfull for infants , whom they will haue saued by the parents faith without it . From the other , that is the Eucharist , they take away both the fruit and the substance of it , making it not the reall body and bloud of Christ ; but only a bare signe and remembrance of it . Not any sacrifice offered to God but only a Sacrament signing or sealing grace ; and therby robbe Christ of all adoration by it as a Sacramēt , and of all subiection or acknowledgment of dominion by it as a sacrifice ; and they robbe the Church of all benifit & comfort both by the Sacrament and sacrifice . We do admit for seuerall states of persons , seuerall sorts of benefits , by seauen seuerall kindes of Sacraments ; all as instruments of Gods power , causing grace which assists all sorts of persons in their seuerall states and functions ; and all excell the Sacraments of the old law . For the Sacrament of baptisme , we belieue it to be a meanes of regeneration from originall sinne , by which all sinne and punishment due to sinne both original & actual is fully remitted , and by which all persons are admitted into the mysticall body of Iesus Christ in his holy Church , and made capable of the benefit of the rest of the Sacraments . And for the Sacrament of the Eucharist , we belieue that not only i● conteines the fountaine of Grace ; but also is offered to God as a sacrifice , to apply the vertue of his sacrifice on the crosse , for the remission of our sinnes , by which is giuen much honour to God , and receiued great benefit by Gods Church , & much comfort to the faithfull both liuing and dead . Seauenthly , for Faith , they and their priuate spirit admit many sorts of faith , and in that none at all ; and make as many faiths as there are priuate spirits in particuler persons , and in that destroy all vnity of faith . We admit one holy Catholicall and Apostolicall faith , one in al , and generall to all , who in all are directed by one spirit of Gods Church . They admit a new and new-deuised faith , neuer receiued by any but in some one or other point by condemned hereticks , in whom it was condemned . We receiue an auncient and euer belieued faith , euer receiued and approued by general Coūcells , ancient Fathers , & holy Saints in Gods Church . They reiect the grounds of faith , as Scripture , Traditions , Church , Councells , and Fathers . We admit , belieue and rely vpon them all , as grounds & foundations wheron we ground and build our beliefe . They admit none of the necessary meanes of faith , neither any common reuelation of God , but priuate of their owne spirit ; nor any proposition of Church , but their owne fancies ; nor any credible testimony and motiues of perswasion , to make their beliefe probable ; nor any habit of faith , to assist the vnderstanding in belieuing , nor any pious affection to incline their will to assent , nor any assent by a diuine , supernaturall , and Christian faith ; but by a general and ( as they call it ) a fained and diabolicall faith , by which they belieue the articles of their faith . We do settle , and rely , by our faith ( in respect of the obiect reuealed ) vpon the reuelation of God , the proposition of Church , the motiues of credibility ; and in respect of persons belieuing , vpon the infused gift of faith , the pious inclination of the will by grace , and the infallible assent caused by the former diuine helpes , and grounded vpon the former infallible foundations , as before is at large proued . They admit into the vnity of their faith all hereticks and schismaticks , collecting and scraping from them all raggs and scraps of broken and condemned opinions and heresies , and yet will not admit into the vnity of their inuisible Church any sinners , wicked or reprobate persons , but all and only the elect and predestinate . We reiect from communion of all faith with vs , all condemned hereticks and Schismaticks , and condemne , with the ancient Church , them and all their condemned opinions ; and admit into the externall communion of our Church all those who not cut off by excommunication , agree with vs in vnity of Fayth , that therein their life and manners may be reformed and amended by the example of others by vertue of Sacraments , & preaching of the Church and Pastours of the same . In all which , they and their spirit take from fayth all vnity in it , all groundes of it , all meanes to it , all supernaturall vertue in it , all dignity , all certainty , all necessity , and all vertue and efficacy following vpon it ; and so leaue no more but an human , faigned , and diabolicall fayth , or a shadow of fayth , and no theologicall diuine fayth at all . All which is contrary in our doctrine of fayth . Eightly , for Man , they by their priuate spirit , derogate , and take away from him , 1. All freedome & liberty of wil , naturall to him , as following vpon his being a reasonable soule , and distinguishing him from brute beastes . We attribute that freedome by which he concurs with Gods grace , and his motions to his owne good , and is the authour of his owne euill . 2. They take from him all infusion and habits of grace , which do giue life , beauty , and ability to the soule . All which we admit both of fayth , hope , charity , and all morall vertues to enable and assist vs , in the exercise of all piety . 3. They take from him all inward iustification , adoption , and perfection , and leaue him only an exteriour imputation of the same , supposing God to account & impute him iust , but to leaue him sinnefull and vniust . We admit in man an inward , reall , and true iustification , sanctification , or adoption by grace , which inwardly infused and remayning , doth expell & t●ke away sinne , renue and reuiue our soule , and adopt vs heires to the kingdome of heauen , by which God making vs pure and iust , doth therefore account and repute vs such . 4. They leaue a man after his iustification , impure , vniust , sinnefull , and vncleane in all the workes of his soule , and in euery action of the same , making all the best workes proceeding from him to be sinnefull , and hatefull to God , and deseruing eternall damnation , and so leaue him destitute of any merit or reward . We make him pure , iust , and cleane by grace , which doth giue life to the soule , as the soule doth giue life to the body , and therewith doth impart to it motion , vertue , beauty and power to do good , to please God , and to merit a reward at his handes ; by which man , increasing in grace and merit , doth also increase in perfection and glory . 5. They take from man all benefit , all necessity , all possibility of doing good workes , of keeping Gods law , of abstayning from sinne , and thereby make him sinnefull as well in doing good as euill , as well in refraining as committing euill . We attribute to him ability to auoid all sinnes , possibility , by grace , to keep Gods lawes , as easy and sweet , and to do not only workes of precepts , which are commanded , but also workes of counsell , and supe●erogation , more then are commanded . They take from man all benefit of prayer , as of thinges either needlesse , which otherwise are certaine and sure to be obtayned ; or hopelesse , as impossible to be done or obtayned by vs , and thereby derogate from all vertue , and feruour of prayer and deuotion . We encourage men to prayer by affirming that God hath made our prayer a meane by which he will , and without which he will not dispose many of his benefits to vs , and that therefore he will haue vs pray , that by our prayer we may obtaine . 7. They take from man all feare , care , and labour for his saluation , by their assurance , that only fayth iustifyeth and saueth , & that sayth once had cannot be lost ; and make him idle , carelesse and presumptuous of himselfe by their securing him by speciall fayth , of his iustification & saluation . We do teach him , by our doctrine , with holy Scripture , not to be secure of the propitiation of his sinne , but with feare and trembling to worke his saluation , by good workes , to make his vocation sure , and therfore to liue piously , to walke warily , to watch diligently , and to preuent carefully Sathan and his craft . In all which they robbe man , and leaue him so bare of all benefits either of nature or grace , that they leaue him neither liberty of will , nor ability or concurrence to do good , nor infused grace and guifts to assist him in good , to arme him against sinne , to giue due honour to God , to deserue reward with God , to adopt him the child of God , or to giue him any encouragement in walking the way of God , in treading the path of vertue , & auoiding the allurements to sinne , and the snare of Sathan . All which are contrary in vs , and in our Catholike doctrine . Ninthly , For Sinne , they and their priuate spirit make not only all actions sinnes , but all sinnes mortall , and so all actions mortall sinnes , and all , as well good as bad , deseruing damnation ; and therby in a sort disswade as much from good as from bad actions , and make men desperate of doing good , and prone to doe all bad . Wee make of works some good , and some bad , and of bad some mortall sins , depriuing of grace and glory , some veniall not depriuing of grace and yet diminishing the feruour of grace , and thereby doe perswade men in due sort , to auoid all sinne , chiefly mortall sinne , and encourage them to do good and animate them to increase in grace , goodnesse , and perfection . They make the auoiding of bad or the doing of good works , the keeping of Gods commandements , or the performing his will to be impossible , and therby disharten men from attempting either to keepe his precepts , or to obey his will , or to please him , in any worke or action . We belieue his yoake to be sweet and his burthen easy , and the obeying of his commandements & auoiding of sinne by grace to be possible & facile ; and therby encourage all to labour that they may obey his precepts , and performe his holy will and pleasure . They make no bad works to be imputed to the elect , and no good works to escape punishment in the reprobate : and therby make the one fearlesse & carelesse of any bad , and the other hopelesse and desperate to do any good . We make good works in all to be good , and in the good to be meritorious ; and bad works in al to be bad , and to deserue punishment , and depriue men of Gods fauour , till by repentance they be washed and pardoned ; and therby inuite all to do good , and to auoid bad , and repent them of bad . They hould that no sinne in the faithfull can depriue him of faith , which once had can by no sinne be lost ; and therby lull men in a security of saluation , and allure them to a liberty of sinne , which they belieue cannot depriue them of Gods fauour . We hould that grace once had may be lost , and is lost by mortall sinne ; and therby warne men carefully to keep Gods grace , & diligently to preuent sinne before it be committed , and presently to report after it be cōmitted . Tenthly , For good Works , they & their priuate spirit hould , that no good works are good , iust , perfect , or meritorious , yea that none are necessary or possible , but that al are sinfull ; and therby make it bootlesse and needlesse to striue to do them . We hould , that good works are not only good , but may be perfect & meritorious of an eternal reward , wherby we animate all to the working of them . They hould that cōtinency & virginity is no vertue , but a suggestion of Sathan , wicked , diabolicall , and a rebellion against God in religious persons ; and that matrimony is a state more noble perfect , & spirituall then it , and therby induce all to marry . We hould that single life , chastity , and continency is a vertue more perfect , noble , and holy then marriage , and therfore is preferred by God , as more spirituall , before marriage , and more to be esteemed by men is more honourable . They hold that fasting and punishing the body by mortification , watching , & discipline is no vertue , is needlesse , and no part of pennance or satisfaction , but a killing of ones selfe ; wherby they withdraw men from austerity & strictnesse of life . We hould that it being vsed discreetly and in measure , is good and pious , as commended in the old and new Testament , and practised by all Saints and holy persons ; & therby animate all to it . They hould that the forsaking the world & liuing in a retired Religious life , is a meere human tradition , and an vnprofitable will-worship of God. We hould that it is a meane of perfection , & an imitation of an Apostolicall life ; and therfore cōmendable in them who can vndertake it . They hould that vowes of perfection are a curiosity , presumption , pride , contrary to God , & not to be vsed by Christians . We hould that to vow obedience , pouerty , and chastity are gratefull to God , & great helps and meanes to perfection , as counsailed in holy scripture , and laudable in all the professours of them . In all which as they take from all sinne all punishment due to it , all offence to God inseparable from it , and all malice annexed to it ; as they take away all difference by which one sin is damnable rather then another , & all feare which may bridle any from committing sinne ( in which they make men fearlesse of sinne , and carelesse to commit it : ) so they take from good works in generall all goodnesse and participation of good , al iustice and vprightnesse before God , all valew and dignity by grace , all benefit and grace of merit , all hope or comfort of pleasing God , all necessity of doing them , and all possibility of doing them without offence of God. And from good works in particuler they take away also from all vowes their obligation to be performed from chastity all possibility to be obserued , from fasting , pennance , and mortification all necessity to be vsed , from prayer and deuotion all meanes to obteine that they aske , and from charity all efficacy to iustify before God , and from all and euery one in their proper kind all power and necessity to do them , all courage and alacrity to do them hopefully . Al which is contrary in vs , & our Catholicke doctrine . Eleauenthly , From the glory of heauen , & the ioyes of it , they and their priuate spirit do derogate , in affirming . 1. That neither any reward is iustly giuen in heauen for any good done vpon earth , nor any crowne of iustice in that life for suffering of iniustice in this , nor any lawrell of Martyrs , Confessours , or Virgins there , for the confessing the name of Christ . 2. That in heauen are no differences of mansions , or diuersity of degres of glory , and that all are like and al equall in glory and beatitude euen to the Apostles , and the mother of God ; wherby they remoue a strong motiue to draw men to labour for perfection in this life , that they may attaine to a higher place of glory in the next . We , and our Catholicke doctrine doe belieue , 1. That God doth iustly reward in heauen all our good deedes done on earth , and doth giue crownes of glory for our sufferings for him , and bestow variety of glorious lawrels by gifts of accidentall beatitude for our glorifying him in any eminent manner of perfection . 2. That as starres , so Saints do differ in clarity hauing their seuerall mansions , places , and glory , according to their degrees of grace and merit : wherby al are encouraged to aime at perfection , in hope of so high a remuneration . For hell , and the place and paines of it , they and their priuate spirit take from it , 1. The difference of places , as Limbus patrum , puerorum , & Purgatory . 2. The materiall and reall fier of hell ; denying , as many do , (a) , all true fier , and admitting only a metaphoricall and imaginary fier . 3. The suffering of soules in it before the day of iudgment . 4. The corporall place or prison of hell , admitting only a torment of cōscience before the day of iudgment (b) . 5. The lawfulnesse to auoid sinne for feare of hell , which they make a sinne and vnlawfull ; by all which they make the paines and torments of hell to be lesse feared , and sinnes for the feare of them lesse auoided . We and our Catholicke doctrine do hould , 1. The difference of places according to different estates and deserts , as the Limbus puetorū , for children dying without Baptisme , the Limbus patrum for the faithfull dying before Christ , and Purgatory for faithful dying without full satisfaction . 2. The locall place , and the materiall fier , and the reall suffering of the present paines of hell by the soules of the damned , and withall , that it is a worke good , though not the best , to auoid sinne for feare of hell . In all which we extoll the iustice of (c) God mixt with mercy , in punishing al sorts according to their deserts , and deterre men from liberty of sinne for feare of punishment in hell . And thus we haue in this second part confuted this priuat spirit , which in the former part we proued to be the sole and whole ground of the Protestant faith and saluation ; 1. By authorities of holy Scripture . 2. By testimony of auncient Fathers . 3. By reasons drawne from the difficulty of discerning spirits . 4. By reasons drawne from a right interpreter of Holy Scripture . 5. By reasons drawne from an infallible iudge of controuersies of fayth . 6. By reasons drawne from the nature and certainty of fayth . 7. By Circular absurdities to which this spirit leadeth . 8. By Doctrinall absurdities which follow vpon it , and the doctrine of it against Fayth , and the Creed ; against Hope and the Pater noster ; and against good life , morall vertues , the ten Commandements , and all laws of God ▪ Church , or Cōmon-wealth . In which also we haue made plaine how this their doctrine , groūded vpon this their priuate spirit , doth derogate from God , and the Blessed Trinity , whome it makes the authour of all sinne , a sinner , lyer , dissembler , and tyrant , the only sinner , and a greater sinner then either the Diuell or man ; doth derogate from Iesus Christ , and his birth , life , passion , and resurrection , whome it dishonours in making him neither Phisitiā , Lawyer , Iudge , Priest , or perfect Redeemer , or Sauiour , but one ignorant , impotent , sinnefull , and damned ; doth derogate from the Church of God triumphant in heauen , which it dishonours in taking from it knowledge & charity in Saints , and Angels , and honour and reuerence to them ; and from the Church militant on earth , which it dishonours , in taking from it all authority , visibility , vniuersality , perpetuity , or extancy , and being vpon earth so many ages . How it derogates from fayth , which it dishonours in taking from it all groundes , whereon it is to be builded , & all meanes wherby it is to be attained , and in making it contradictory , rash , presumptuous , sinnefull , and preiudicious to all Hope and Charity . How it derogates from man , whome it disables & depriues of all Free-will , of all inherent grace , of all good life and workes , of all possibility to obey Gods Commandements , to abstaine from sinne , to merit any reward . How it derogates from all morall vertues and good life , from which by many principles it doth withdraw , & withall doth draw to all vice , and wickednesse , doth giue the reines to all Epicurean liberty and loosenesse . In all which the spirit of our Catholike Church , and the doctrine of it is shewed to be contrary , and to giue du● honour to God , to Christ , to his Saints , Angels , Church , to Fayth , Sacraments , and the rest . And to be a meanes to encourage all Christians to the practise of all vertue and perfection , and to auoid all sinne and wickednes . All this we haue carefully & painefully laboured to performe in this second Part of the treatise of that pri-Spirit . THE PROTESTANTS OBIECTIONS , and proofes , taken out of Scripture , for the defence of their priuate Spirits authority to inrerpret Scripture , and iudge of Controuersies ; proposed and answered . CHAP. X. Of certaine obseruations , profitable for the solution of Obiections . SECT . 1. HITHERTO we haue battered , & that I hope sufficiently , the maine fabricke of this imaginary edifice of the Protestant priuate spirit . It remaines only for this second Part , that we raze , & demolish the foundation vpon which this their conceit of their priuate spirits authority is built and erected , that is , that we solue the reasons , or rather obiections , taken out of holy Scripture , vpon which they ground their conceit ▪ for which we may note , that as our Catholike doctrine doth not deny either the being or permanency of the Spirit of God in euery faythfull both person and Doctour ( for all faythfull by the spirit of God haue faith ) or the effect and operation of the same , in assisting thē in the finding out of the true sense of holy scripture ( for neither are the faithful prohibited from all reading , nor the learned debarred from all interpreting of holy scripture ; ) so there is a great difference betweene the effect and operation of this spirit in the Protestant and Catholicke , as well simple as learned , as both do chalenge it , and rely vpon it . For as ( for better illustration , we may obserue in a naturall body , and the spirit or soule of man , in which comparison we imitate . S. Paul ) the soule or spirit doth giue information , or operation to the whole body , and euery part thereof , yet ▪ so that euery member hath not euery operation , all members haue not one action ; but the head one , as to iudge ; the handes another , as to worke ; the feet another , as to walke ; and the mouth is to receaue , the belly to containe , the stomake to disgest the meat ; and so it is proper to the eye to see , to the eare to heare , and to neither to discourse and reason , which belongs only to the braine : so in the spirituall body of the Church , and the faythfull members of it , the spirit of God doth assist all , and euery one in particuler , as well the meanest as the greatest , as well the most simple as the most learned , VVho are many , but one body in Christ : yet so , that as euery member is different one from another , so the operation of euery one is different and not the same , but as some are Lay , some Ecclesiasticall persons , some secular , some Religious , some simple , some learned , some common people , some Pastours and Prelates , so to euery one of vs is giuen grace according to the measure of the donation of Christ ; according to the measure of fayth , and to euery one for his profit , that hauing all gifts according to the grace which is giuen to vs , euery one may remaine in the vocation , in which he is called , wherupon all are not Prophets , all are not Doctours , all are not Euangelists : All are not Iudges of faith , and interpreters of holy Scripture , though all haue the spirit , but God , diuiding to euery one as he will , giues to some the spirit to heare and obey , to others to direct and command , to some the spirit to labour and worke by practicall offices , to others to contemplate and study by speculatiue functions , yet to all so , and in that manner , that as euery member hath need of another , for the eye cannot say to the hand , I stand in no need of thy helpe : so euery one member hath his gift , and the vse and operation of it , for the benefite of the whole body , with d●pendance and subordination to the whole , and according to the order and proportion of the whole , that as the necessity and conueniency of the whole body doth require ; so the operation and function of the part is accommodated and applied : and so all the parts and members of the Church , being by one spirit combined and vnited togeather as members of one body , and in vnity of one hody , do euery one belieue as they are directed by the head , and do proceed in all with subordination to the head , and worke in all for the vse and benefit of the whole , suffer for the defence of the whole ; and so by a communion both with themselues , and with the whole do all labour for the whole , conserue the whole , and keep still an vnion and communion with the whole , and are directed according to the faith , the rule , the reason , and the Iudgment or direction of the whole body or Church of Christ . As long therfore as euery member , and his spirit hath this direction , subordination , and vnion with the whole body of the Church and the spirit of it ; so long doth it prooced in order and vnity , and so farre it is agreable to the spirit of God directing his holy spouse the Church : but when this spirit doth beginne to be singular of it selfe , to deuise a new doctrine , to teach otherwise then the rule of faith hath prescribed , or to assume the authority of a new maister ; When it deuides it selfe from the spirit of Gods Church , and doth oppose it selfe against it , or extoll it selfe aboue it : when it will not be subiect and subordinate to it but doth erect a Cathedra of authority of its own , or an opinion of doctrine of its owne against it ; then it is an euident signe that it is not a spirit of vnity and concord , but of dissention and diuision , & so not an inspiration of God to be imbraced , but a suggestion of sathan to be reiected . Out of which rule may be obserued the difference betweene a Catholicke and a Protestant spirit in expounding of scripture , and withall , the weaknesse or rather impertinency of the Protestant obiections for their manner of interpretation of scripture by this their spirit . For , first we distinguish betweene them , who without offence lawfully may expound , and who by authority haue warrant infallibly to expound holy scripture . Of the former sorts are all faythfull Christians who hauing vnderstanding sufficient and a pious intention , do with humility beginne , and according to the rule of fayth proceed in seeking out the right sense of Scripture , and so none , who are thus able , and thus proceed , are barred from either reading , or expounding to their own cōfort the Holy Scripture , as our aduersaries do falsely calumniate vs. Of the later sort , are the Pastours and Prelates of the Church , who hauing lawfull ordination and succession , and continuing in vnity and subordination , do either deliuer the sense of Scripture , as it is taught by holy Church , or els confirme and explicate any doctrine of fayth when they are collected in a generall Councell . And these , thus vsing the lawfull meanes , and obseruing the vsuall rule of fayth , haue authenticall warrant , by the infallible assistance of the holy Ghost , that they cannot erre in deliuering any sense of scripture as a ground of fayth and beliefe . The Protestants doe giue not only liberty , but also authority to all , not only Pastours and Prelates , but also Artificers and common people , as well vnlearned as learned , to frame to themselues such a firme assent to this or that ( seeming to them infallibly true ) sense of holy Scripture ( euery one according to his owne preiudicate conceit or priuate spirit ) that thereupon they dare aduenture the certainty of their Fayth , and the hope of their saluation . Secondly , we make a difference betweene a sense of scripture produced in the Schooles , to proue or confirme a schoole question , & a sense declared ex Cathedra to ground an article of faith , or betweene a preachers conceit deliuered in the pulpit to exhort to good life and manners , and a doctrine proposed by the Church , as reuealed by God , & necessary to be belieued . In which for the former , we giue a liberty to any preacher to frame out of his own cōceit any sense which ( not being opposit to true fayth ) may moue the auditory to piety & good life : but for the later we confine the ranging liberty of the wit , and inuention , euen of the Doctours & Pastours in Gods Church , & prescribe , as fayth Vincentius Lyrin . that ▪ They teach that which is deliuered to them , not which is inuented by them ; that which they receaued , not that which they deuised ; that which is of publike tradition ; not of priuate vsurpation ; that of which they are not authours , but keepers ; not beginners , but followers ; not leaders , but lead . In which cunningly caruing , faythfully placing , & wisely adorning , like another Beezeler , the pretious pearles of diuine fayth , by adding splendour , grace , and beauty , they are to illustrate more clearely that which was belieued more obscurely ; and to deliuer to posterity more fully explicated , that which by their forefathers , being not vnderstood , was with reuerence belieued . Alwayes so teaching that which they learned , that they teach after a new māner , but not a new doctrine . That is , as afterward he sayth ; That they interprete the diuine Canon according to the tradition of the whole Church , and the rules of Catholike fayth , that is , Vniuersality , Antiquity , and Consent ; and if any part do rebell against the whole , or nouelty oppose antiquity , or if dissent of a few controule the consent of all , or the most , then m●st they preferre the integrity of the whole before the corruption of a part , the veneration of antiquity before prophanation of nouelty , and the generality of a Councell , before the temerity of a few . The Protestants giue a liberty , by the priuiledge of their spirit , to euery not only Preacher , but priuate person , to expound the most difficult and important places of Scripture , namely of the Apocalyps , & S. Pauls Epistles , not only for the schooles in scholasticall questions , or in pulpit for exhortations to good life , but in deepest articles , & greatest controuersies of Fayth , euery one as his spirit shall suggest , and thereupon they direct them to ground their fayth & the saluation of their owne soule , and of many others who rely vpon them . Whereby , as sayth Vincentius Lyrinensis , They make it a solemne practise to delight in prophane nouelties , and to loath all decrees of antiquity ; and by making ostentation of a false opinion of knowledge , do make shipwracke of all fayth . Thirdly , the Spirit of a Catholike will not presume to expound any text of scripture contrary to that sense which either the rule of fayth , or the practise of the Church , or the decree of a Councell , or the consent of Fathers hath receaued as true and authenticall , but in al will receaue & follow that which is determined and decreed in thē . The Protestāt spirit will censure , reiect , and condemne any sense , though neuer so generally receaued , or strongly confirmed by all authority of any Church , Tradition , Councell , or Fathers , and deuise a new one of his owne inuention , and therby wil build a new fayth and religion , which it perswades the followers to be the only way to truth and life . Fourthly , the spirit of euery Catholike will deliuer his owne interpretation only as probable , and submit himselfe to the censure and iudgment of the spirit of the Catholike Church , captiuating with S. Paul , his vnderstanding to obedience of Fayth . The Protestants spirit will auouch their interpretation as certaine , infallible , and of Fayth ; and all with that obstinacy , that no reason or authority shall remoue them from it , or alter their opinion in it . Fifthly , the spirit of a Catholike , being setled & groūded in a certainty of Catholike and Apostolike fayth , will expound Scripture according to the rule of the same , for the illustration or confirmation of the same fayth , as it is generally receaued : but will not ground himselfe ; and his beliefe in his owne exposition , nor perswade and introduce a new beliefe vpon the same . The Protestant spirit will ground it selfe , and his first beliefe , vpon his owne exposition , and by the same perswade others to forsake their old fayth , and to follow a new , and so change the ancient religion , for a nouell opinion grounded vpon a new exposition of any text of Scripture , framed according to the fantasy of the priuate spirits conceit . And thus though Catholike Doctours and Pastours haue the spirit of God to expound holy Scripture , as much and more then the Protestants haue , yet they vse & apply it either to schoole-questions and manners only , or as probable and credible only ; or if to doctrine of fayth , they apply it , either to illustrate and confirme their fayth , or if to ground and settle it , they square it according to the rule of fayth , the practise of the ancient Church , the decrees of Councells , and the consent of Fathers . All which the Protestant Doctour , in the setling and resolution of his Fayth , reiects , and relies his fayth vpon an exposition of scripture grounded only vpon his owne proper and priuate conceit . The obiections answered . SECT II. THE Obiections which the Protestants Luther , Melancthon , Brentius , Magdeburgenses , Musculus , Whitaker , & other Protestants do vsually make for the power and authority of this their priuate spirit to expound scripture , are drawne some from , those places which affirme the interpretation of scripture to be a guift , & that gratis , and freely bestowed : others from those places which require reading , prayer or meditation in euery one , for the obtaining of this gift . Of the first sort are these and such like . First , they obiect those places where the guift of (a) Prophecy , or interpretation of speaches , is attributed to the operation of one and the same spirit , which deuides to euery one as it will. Where also Prophecy , that is , interpretation of scripture & preaching , is giuen to the Faythfull if all doe prophecy . Euery (b) one hath a Psalme , hath a reuelation hath a tongue , hath an interpretation . Let Prophets two or three speake , and the rest iudge . You may all , one by one prophecy , that all may learne , and all may be exhorted . Therefore euery one who hath the spirit and grace of God , hath the gift to interprete scripture . To which is answered 1. That in all those places S. Paul speakes of guifts extraordinary , and gratis giuen for the tyme , such as are the guift of languages , the curing of diseases , foretelling thinges to come , and interpreting of obscure reuelations , or mysteries , which were bestowed only for a tyme , and as personall vpon the Apostles ; and first belieuers , with whome they decayed and ceased : not of any guifts ordinary and generall which are to be permanent in the Church , and common to all faythfull . Therfore these places can make nothing for euery faythfull persons power and ability to expound scripture , & that so certainly , that vpon it he may build his fayth and saluation . 2. These guifts are not giuen any one of them to all persons , nor yet all of them to any one person , and that for all ends & vses , for the guifts are giuen according to the measure of fayth , according to the measure of the donation of Christ , according to the rule of Fayth . Therefore all these guifts are not alike giuen to euery one , but so distributed that some are Apostles some Prophets , some Euangelists , others Pastours and Doctours : and not all Apostles , not all Prophets , not all Doctours , not all workers of miracles , speakers with tongues , or interpreters of speaches . Therfore all and euery faythfull person hath not the guift of interpreting and expounding scripture , but those vpon whome by speciall guift or function it is bestowed . 3. They who haue this guift , and the spirit of it , haue it as subordinate , and a part or parcell of the spirit of Gods Church , by which it is to be directed , not as opposite , singular , or independent of the same , or of any one but themselues ; for so was the spirit of the Prophets subiect to the Prophets . That is , as S. Chrysostome expounds it , that both the Prophet and his guift was subiect to the colledge or company of the Prophets , which is , the whole Church ; and the spirit of euery member is applyed to the vse and benefit of the whole body . What spirit therefore is priuate and proper as of it selfe , and either diuided from the head , or not subordinate to the whole body of the Catholike Church , and applyed to the vse and benefit of the same , that spirit is not the spirit of vnity and peace , but of diuision and dissention , and so not the spirit of God ( who is not the God of dissention but of peace ) but of Sathan , whose kingdome thus by spirits deuided will be made desolate and such is the spirit of all Protestants , as is before fully declared . According to which groundes are answered and explicated in particular all places which are obiected for this spirits authority . As first , That one and the same spirit doth work all these , deuiding to euery one as it will , is spoken first of reuelations and guifts extraordinary , called gratis giuen , not ordinary and permanent in the Church of God , such as is this guift of interpretation of Scripture . Also it is spoken of persons priuate , & the vulgar sort , vpon whome this extraordinary guift is sometymes bestowed , not of the Councels and Prelats to whose function , as proper to it , this guift or promise is annexed . And if any priuate persons haue had this extraordinary guift , as Amos a sheepheard , Debora a woman , who in the old Testament were Prophets , and Origen who not yet a Priest was a Doctour and interpreter of Scripture , they were priuiledges extraordinary , and a few only , which make not a generall rule for all , and what they taught , they taught not as Maisters , who did either arrogate to themselues any proper authority , or did teach any new doctrine , or did refuse any subordination to Superiour authority : but did it either to the consolation of themselues , or to the instruction and confirmation of others , and all according to the rule of fayth and common receaued doctrine . In which manner any , though not yet called , and hauing a talent sufficient may ( as before ) presume to interprete holy Scripture , and deliuer the sense of it to others , though he haue not yet the grace of holy Orders , nor Pastorall , or Episcopall function . Secondly , That of Rom. 1.26 . hauing gifts according to grace which is giuen to vs differēt , whether prophecy according to the reason of faith , or ministery in administring , is not so meant that euery one , according to the proportion of his faith , hath the gift of prophecy or interpetation of scripture : but that euery one who hath these gifts should exercise them according to the talent and guifts bestowed on them , not presuming to be wiser then he ought , but to be wise vnto sobriety , and according to the measure of the donation of Christ , and not to intermedle in anothers office and function ; as ( to instance in the Apostles example ) he who hath the ministery proper to Deacons and inferior orders , which was to distribute almes and to take care of the poore , is not to medle in the function of Bishops , which is to preach and instruct in doctrine of faith & to conferre orders , but euery one , according to the reason or measure of faith , that is , not of his infused and supernaturall faith by which he is disposed to grace , but of his gift of vnderstanding of scripture , and of high mysteries of beliefe , is to proceed in his function , & to vse that talent bestowed vpon them to the profit of the whole body . Which gift also , as it is not a property inseparably annexed to grace , ( for many who are in state of grace are destitut of this guift , & others who are not so holy , but for life wicked , often haue the benefit of it ) so it is not vsually bestowed vpon the vulgar and common sort of people , but is proper to Ecclesiasticall persons , of whose function are two sorts , that is Episcopall , to preach and explicate holy scripture ; and Diaconicall , to minister in externall function of giuing almes , seruing the poore , and the rest , as is by the Apostle heere expressed , in which euery one remaining in his vocation in which he is called , is to exercise his owne office and function . For , as saith S. Hierome , It is not for euery one to try gold , and expound holy scriptures , to tast wine , and vnderstand the Prophets and Apostles . And , as saith S. Paul , All are not Prophets nor Apostles , nor Doctours : but some Prophets , some Apostles , some Euangelists , some Doctours , till the consummatiō of the world . And so some , to whom by their function it belongs , not all faithfull of what sort soeuer , haue this gift of interpretation of scripture bestowed on them . Thirdly , those places of 1. Cor. 14. are vnderstood , as the whole Chapter is , neither of any ordinary and infallible interpretation of holy scripture , nor yet of any solemne and publicke office , sacrifice , or benediction of the Masse , much lesse of any guift ordinary & common to al & euery faithfull person , either for vnderstanding of scripture , or for hearing the solemne seruice of the Church ( as all expositours both ancient and moderne do confesse , & the very words of the text do conuince ) but of priuate praiers and praisings of God in Hymnes , Canticles , and spirituall songes , and of priuate guifts of speaking with tongues , and prophecying , or interpreting of holy scripture , and exhorting for mutuall consolation and instruction one another . All which as they were guifts gratis giuen , rare , extraordinary , singular , yea and miraculously bestowed vpon seuerall persons of sundry sorts in the particuler congregations and assemblies of the faithfull in those times , and only for that present time , and not to continue in the Church ; so an order and methode is here prescribed in the vse and exercise of these guifts by the Apostle , that al may be done honestly and according to order , without confusion , and to edification , specially of Infidels not yet conuerted , to whom cōming to heare the exercises of the Christians , these were signes and testimonies of the spirit of God among Christians . Whereupon it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , that , is thy proper , and priuate benediction : and the Prophets did speake somtimes in languages , which neither themselues nor the auditours vnderstood , as v. 13. and 14. is expressed , where the speakers are willed to pray that they themselues may vnderstand , and the prophecying or interpreting of high misteries is preferred before the vnknowne & not vnderstood languages . For which we may note out of the auncient writers Iustine Martyr , and Tertullian who liued in the age of the Apostles , that the times then so requiring it at the first begining of the Church , this order was obserued in the meetings of Christiās which were then , for the place , priuate , as in time of persecution ; that is , 1. The Psalmes were sung 2. The Prophecies and scripture was read . 3. The sermon was made by the Bishop . 4. The sacrifice ( which consisted in the oblation , consecration , communion , Canon , & some short prayers ) was offered . 5. The Communion was giuen to all . 6. Some did sing Hymnes and Psalmes of praise and thankesgiuing , others did Prophecy & speake of high mysteries , and shew their guift of languages . 7. Others more spirituall , did , as they were inspired by speciall guifts , interpret and expound scripture , which was vsed euen by women . And lastly , they concluded all with an Agape , or banquet of charity , and hymnes of praising God , & so brak vp the assembly . Which practise as it was only for that time , and in time when these extraordinary and miraculous guifts were bestowed ( for it was not obserued in the future & setled times of the Church ) so with the cessation or ending of those guifts , the order and manner partly ceased , partly was changed into a set order & forme for succeding times , which conformably is obserued by our present Church in practise , as may be seene in Cornelius vpon the 1. Cor. 14. Nothing therfore in this Chapter is intended , or spoken , of the generall and ordinary power and authority of all the common people , and euery persons spirit to interprete scripture , and iudge of Controuersies of faith . 2. It is answered , that the Prophecy , heere spoken of , is not an interpretation of Scriptures , but of languages , by which that which was spoken in strange languages to the admiration of Infidels ( for whose conuersion the guift of tongues was giuē ; ) was interpreted by this guift of prophecy in others , for the instruction of the faithfull ( for whom this Prophecy was giuen ) for languages are a signe to Infidels , but Prophecy to the faithfull (a) . When therfore the guift of tongues ceased , this guift of Prophecy also ceased , as being giuen only for the interpreting of tongues . 3. The matter and subiect both spoken by tongue , and interpreted by Prophecy , was not doctrine , or mysteries of faith , but either exhortation to piety for edification and consolation (b) ; or of things secret , as future euents , or vnknowne faults , or facts done , by which the secrets of the heart of the infidell or idiot was made knowne , and he conuinced and iudged of all (c) : therfore it makes nothing for doctrine of faith , and interpretation of scripture . 4. This manner of Prophecy howsoeuer , and of whatsoeuer it was , it was not independent , and of it selfe free to interprete what , and how it will : but so , that the rest doe iudge (d) ; & that the spirits of Prophets be subiect to the Prophets (e) . And so euery priuate spirit must be subiect to the iudgment of the Church , and the Churches spirit . Fourthly , they obiect those places where it is said , that All thy Childrē are taught of our Lord (f) ; Al shal be docible of God (g) ; Your selues haue learned of God (i) ; I will giue my law in their bowels and I will write it in their heart (k) ; All shall know me from the least to the greatest (l) ; If any will do his will who sent me , he shall vnderstand of the doctrine whether it be of God (m) ; My sheepe do heare my voice & do follow me (n) ; Yow haue no need that any do teach you , but as his vnction teacheth you of all things (o) . All these places , I say do not either ioyntly altogether , or particularly any one , mention any priuiledge that euery one hath , by the instinct of his owne priuate spirit , to interprete holy scripture , to decide deep mysteries of faith , and to iudge of all controuersies of diuinity , which is the point auerred by the Protestants , denied by vs , and in controuersy betweene both . 2. In them is affirmed only that God will giue his inward guift of grace to all sort of persons , so sufficiently that they may know him , his truth , and the true way to saluation , and by the same may obserue his Commandements , and come to be saued : ( In which yet is neither excluded , but rather supposed as precedent , and an exteriour proponent cause , the ordinary meanes of preaching by Pastours , and of instruction by them and subordination to them : ) But yet is not giuen to any one any power or priuiledge to preferre his owne spirit before the spirit of the whole Church , or to censure the doctrine which is once adiudged by the same ; which among the rest this Protestant priuate spirit doth assume to it selfe . For which we may note , that it is one thing to haue faith sufficient for saluation ; another to haue the guift of infallible interpretatiō of scripture . The former is a guift general to all the faythful , & though they be as yet (a) little ones who only sucke milke ; though they be as yet (b) carnal not spiritual ; thogh they be (c) ignorant of many things ; and haue many (d) thinges wanting ( to the perfection ) of their faith : Yet they be sealed with (e) the spirit of the promise , (f) the pledge of our inheritance , (g) haue the spirit of God dwelling in them , and so haue the literall verity of all the former places verifyed in them . The later is a guift peculiar and proper only to them , who by place and function are (h) spirituall and perfect , haue their (i) senses exercised to the discerning of good and euill . And haue the guift of (k) discerning of spirits , and interpreting of speaches . And these are they who as tryers and discerners of fayth , interpreters of Scripture , and haue the guift and power infallible to direct others in the doctrine of fayth , who are ex officio the Pastours and Prelates of Gods Church , and are (l) as Bishops to rule ; (m) to feed the flocke of Christ ; (n) to exhort and reproue with all authority ; to (o) controule & rebuke them sharply , that they may be sound in the fayth ; and (p) to denounce to certaine , not to teach otherwise . And all by that power which God hath giuen them to (q) edification , and to reuenge all disobedience , and to bring into captiuity al vnderstanding to the obedience of Christ . This is the office of the Prelates and Bishops of Gods Church . 3. This inward guift of grace or vnction of the Holy Ghost is only an efficient , internall , and cooperant cause , and so necessary , to mooue the vnderstanding and will to assent to that which , as certaine , is proposed : but this iudge or interpreter must be an exteriour proponent cause , which must deliuer to vs this sense as certaine , which being proposed grace doth enable vs to belieue . Now all these and such like places are meant of the interiour guift of grace , which is necessary , but not ordinarily sufficient without a precedent , exteriour , and proponent cause , which is this infallible Interpreter of holy Scripture , in Pastours of the Church . Fifthly , to those places where it is commanded , not to belieue euery spirit , but to proue the spirits if they be of God (a) ; and to proue all thinges , and hould that which is good (b) , is answered . 1. That all , and euery person of the body of the holy Church is not directed to make this tryall , but only the chiefe , that is the Pastours , and Prelates , as when a man is willed to discerne and see , not euery member and part of the body is directed so to do , but the chiefe members , as the head , which is to iudge , and the eye to see , to whose function it is proper and belonges , or as when an Vniuersity is directed to examine and iudge of such a booke , and doctrine , not euery student , but the chiefe Doctours of that faculty are so directed and willed ; so that not euery person and vnlearned party in the Church is to make this tryall of spirits , but only Pastours and Prelates , to whose function it is peculiar and proper to iudge and decide all such like questions and doubts . 2. This tryall and iudgment is to be made , not of questions & doctrine already decided and determined by the authority of the Church , but of such as are yet doubtfull and vndecided . For that which is once determined by the generall consent of the Church or Councell , is not againe to be examined and iudged by any priuate mans spirit ; for so the Decrees of Coūcells were both vaine & endlesse : that therfore is to be tryed which is not before both tryed and iudged , and that by those who haue both ability and authority to do it ; which makes nothing for this priuate spirit , which will both try what is before by any Councell iudged , and will by euery simple & vnlearned person try , and iudge it . Sixthly , to that of 1. Cor. 2.15 . The spirituall man iudgeth all thinges , and himselfe is iudged of none : It is answered , that S. Paul to confound the Corinthians , who standing vpon their humane & worldly wisedome , contemned his vnlearned manner of instruction , affirmes that they being men sensuall can iudge only of sensuall thinges : but he being spirituall and perfect in diuine wisedome can iudge both of things sensuall and spirituall ; and so a spirituall man iudges of all thinges in generall , that is , both of spirituall thinges which are diuine and mysticall , and also of humane thinges which are terrene and sensuall ; but a sensuall man iudges only of temporall thinges of the world , and not of spirituall which are of God. The reason therfore is de generibus singulorum , that a spirituall man iudges of all sortes of thinges both diuine & humane , but not de singulis generunt , that he can iudge in particuler of all kindes or spirituall thinges , as when a man is sayd to eat of all thinges , it is meant that he eates of all kinds of meat , both flesh and fish , not of euery particuler peece of both . 2. Euery spirituall man doth iudge spirituall thinges , but according to such rules and directions as euery thing is to be iudged , that is , thinges manifest and certaine he iudges according as they are iudged already and determined , thinges vncertaine and obscure , according to the rule of Fayth , and the authority and testimony of Councels , Fathers , Tradition , and Church , as before is explicated ; not according to his owne selfe-seeming spirit and conceit , in which his spirit is still subordinate to the spirit of Gods Church , and directed by it . 3. Because euery faithfull Christian is not alwayes spirituall , that is , perfect , hauing his senses exercised in the discerning of good and euill ; for some haue need of milke and not of strong meat , and euery one that is partaker of milke it vnskilful of the word of iustice , for he is a child (a) . Therfore this iudgment , especially of misteries of faith , is not for al imperfect , though faithfull Christians ; but only for persons spirituall , that is , perfect , and vnderstanding in spiritual learning & wisdome . And so it makes nothing for the priuate spirits iudgment in euery faithfull Christian . And because spirituall persons haue not euery one a spirit for all spirituall things , for to one certes by the spirit is giuen the word of wisdome , and to another the word of knowledge according to the same spirit , and to another Prophecy , to another discerning of spirits , all which one and the same spirit worketh . And (b) all are not Apostles , Prophets , or Doctours , nor worke miracles , do cures , or speake with tongues (c) And because some mēbers are more , some lesse honourable , or base , some more weake , some lesse ; and some haue offices & functions , some more honourable , some lesse , some to see and direct , others to walke and be directed , (d) euery one according to his nature & function , though one and the same spirit worke all these therefore all persons who are spirituall haue not all spirituall offices & guifts , but some the guifts of prayer , and contemplation , some of mortification and humiliation , some of obedience & patience , others of discerning of spirits , and others ( to whō by their office it belongs ) of iudging of faith and scripture , as before . And therefore though spirituall men iudge all things spirituall and temporall , yet euery spirituall man doth not infallibly iudge and discerne euery spirituall thing , no more then euery faculty of the soule as sensitiue , vegitatiue or rationall , doth performe all and euery function of feeling growing , and reasoning ; but euery one his proper function . And as the function of the eye is only to see , and of the hāds to worke , and the feet to walke , so they who will giue the function of seeing and iudging of the sense of scripture and misteries of faith to euery person in the body of the Church , do as much as if one should attribut the function of seeing to the handes and feet : for as in a body naturall , so in the body mysticall , ( which is S. Pauls comparison ) some are principal members , some inferiour , so euery one hath his proper function in the Church , as the bishops are eyes to discerne truth , the princes are armes to defend the body , and the people are the rest of the parts of the body to be directed . The function therfore of one is not to be attributed to another , but euery one in his place and degree is to exercise his owne function in his proper office and worke . By which is apparent , that those and such like places of scripture do make nothing for the authority and power of this priuate spirit in euery one to discerne and iudge of all places of scripture and misteries of faith ; except the Protestants , as they attribut to euery spirit power to do euery thing , so they will out of euery place of scripture inferre any thing , & so ex quolibet proue quodlibet , as their spirit doth direct and teach them . And thus much of the first manner of arguments or obiections drawne from the guift of the spirit of God and grace , impertinently applied to proue this their priuate spirits authority . Other obiections answered SECT . III. THE second manner of obiections are drawne from the meanes which are prescribed in scripture for the due & right Vnderstanding of holy scripture , which are prayer , meditation , and diligent seeking & enquiring out the true sense of scripture out of scripture , and such like ; by which the Protestants seeme to backe much their spirits proceeding , for so doth Caluin professe to imbrace that sense of scripture which by meditation annexed , the spirit of God doth suggest ; by vertue of which spirit he contemns all , what any humane wisdone can oppose . For which they obiect that Dauid did meditat day & night in the law of God. That Timothy did from his Childhood learne the Scripture which might instruct him (a) . That S. Peter did will them to attend and looke into the propheticall word as to a candell shining in a darke place (b) . That S. Paul affirmes that faith & faithful persons are built vpon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles (c) . That they of Beroea did search the scriptures , if the things were so (d) as Paul did teach . And that Christ did will the Iewes to (e) search the Scriptures . For all which we are to obserue , 1. That these meanes are good and profitable ; but not sufficient of themselues for a certaine and infallible exposition of scripture : for besides them is required the infallible assistance of the holy Ghost for an infallible sense of scripture to be relied vpō . 2. That these meanes are to be vsed by those who haue power and authority to expound scripture ; to whom , though they be necessary yet are they not of themselues either sufficient , or infallible either to euery priuate person , or to others without other helpes and assistances of the holy Ghost . 3. That priuate persons , when they vse & apply duely these meanes , may giue a probable exposition of scripture , either for their owne consolation and confirmation in faith , or for the edification and aduise of others : but cannot rely vpon it either as a sole and solid foundation of their beliefe , or as a generall rule for the true and certaine exposition of all the difficult and abstruse places of scripture . For , as S. Augustine , saith , such is the profundity of holy scriptures , that though his wit was better , his leasure more , and his diligence greater , yet he might from his child-hood ti●l his old age profit in the vnderstanding of them ; not for that so much of them as is necessary to saluation , is so hardly to be atteined ; but for that when once ones faith is grounded vpon them , so many and manifold misteries remaine for the more intelligent proficients , inuolued in the words , and the ma●ter ▪ that the mo●t aged , witty , and industrious may say when he is become perfect , then he begins . For which elswhere he professes ; that he is ignorant of more things in scripture then he knowes . Therfore only prayer , meditation , and study will not surfice for euery one to find out the true and certaine sense of euery place of Scripture , which for euery one to assume to himselfe would not be a certainty of faith , but presumption of pride . And the same which is sayd of Prayer , Meditation , and study , may be sayd of skill of tongues , conference of originall texts , and other places , and of consideration of antecedents and consequents , of phrases and the like . Of which see Stapleton . Which supposed , the answere to all the former obiections is facile . First , Dauid did read and study the Scripture , but he did it for his priuate consolation and meditation ; not for his foundation in fayth , in which he was before grounded . 2. Timothy did read and study them from his childhood , but to learne the sense and meaning of them of his Maisters and teachers , not to be iudge and censurer of them , and that for his instruction in manners , not for his doctrine of fayth , which he receaued from his Ancestours , not from his owne reading of Scripture . 3. S. Peter did will them to attend to the propheticall doctrine , but not to interprete it according to euery ones priuate spirit , and proper interpretation ( which he forbids , saying : No (a) prophesy of Scripture is made by priuate interpretation : ) much lesse with a neglect of the rules and grounds of fayth , or with a contempt of the Pastours and Superiours of the Church of God , preferring its owne before their exposition . 4. S. Paul affirmes , that we must be built vpon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles (b) , that is , not only vpon the written word of the Apostles or Prophets ( for many had fayth and were Cittizens of Saints , and Domesticals of God before any scripture or writing of the Apostles was extant , and many built their fayth vpon the Apostles , who writ nothing at all ) but vpon the doctrine and fayth reueiled to the Apostles , and by them left by preaching or writing to posterity , and as such by the Church proposed to vs. Out of which nothing can be inferred for making the scripture , much lesse the priuate spirit interpreting it , the sole or sufficient ground of Fayth . Againe , taking the foundation either for the doctrine or writinges of the Apostles , and they who are built vpon it , or for principall partes , or for the body of the Church , we may consider first the foundation of doctrine either in it selfe , and so , as being the truth reuealed , it is the ground of fayth ; or in respect of vs , as by vs it is accepted , and so it relyes vpon the Pastours and Prelates of the Church , by whome it is proposed to vs as reuealed , and for whose authority we receaue it as reuealed . Secondly , we may consider the Church , either as it is the whole body of all faythfull in all tymes , especially after the Apostles , and so it is built vpon the doctrine preached and written , or as it signifies the first heads and directours of it , to wit , the Apostles , and so it is built immediatly vpon Christ , and the holy Ghost , reuealing to them that doctrin and scripture which they haue left to posterity , and which they preach and propose to vs ; and in this sense the Church , that is , the Apostles and first Pastours , were before the doctrine was either preached or written by them , & so were the foundation of their doctrine and preaching of it to vs , though to the rest of the faythfull the doctrine preached and written by them is the foundation vpō which their fayth is built . Which answere doth not only cleare the Scripture for hauing any priuate spirit as Iudge ouer it : but also declares how the Church is built vpon the doctrine of the Apostles , or Prophets ( taking the Prophets , eyther for the writings of the Prophets in the old Testament , or for the Interpreters of the Apostles writing in the new ) and also how the Church in the sense before declared , is the ground of the Apostolical and propheticall doctrine reuealed to the Church , and the first Pastours of it , and by them left to vs , who receaue it from them , and their authority , and so from the Church . 5. They of Beörea did search the scriptures whether those thinges were so as Paul declared (a) , that is , not so , that by searching the scripture they did make themselues , and their spirit iudge of the Apostolicall doctrine preached out of scripture : but so , that either being nor yet fully conuerted and satisfyed , they would with diligence and in humility enquire further of the doctrine preached , which is alwayes permitted , and aduised to all ( for otherwise he that giueth credit quickly , is light (b) of hart ) or that being satisfyed they would , as Catholicke Doctours do , search out , conferre and vnderstand those places of scripture which Paul did alleadge , and thereby the more strongly confirme themselues , and better satisfy others in Fayth . In which as they did proceed prudently and piously , and we permit and aduise euery learned Catholike to do the like : so they did no more make either their spirit , or the Scripture interpreted by their spirit , iudge of the Apostles doctrine , then if one for searching the testimonyes of S. Augustine , which are cyted by Bellarmine , should therby be sayd to make himselfe iudge of Bellarmine his doctrine , or as one searching the places cited by Caluin , to see if they be as they are by him cited , should thereby make himselfe iudge of Caluin and his doctrine . Which to inferre out of their actions , as it is absurd , so is it to inferre , that the Beröeans made themselues iudges of S. Pauls doctrine out of the Beröeans , seeking out the places which S. Paul alleadged . 6. Our Sauiour willed the Iewes to search the Scripture : it is true , but which Iewes ? to wit , those who were learned ; and how ? Not so that he would make them , and their priuate spirits iudges of Scriptures , or the truth found in them , but that he would haue them , being yet incredulous , studiously to informe themselues of him , being the true Messias , out of those Scriptures , which they belieued already to be true , and to beare true witnesse of the true Messias ; which is no more then to persuade any Protestant to read Scriptures , Fathers , and Catholike authours , and out of them to informe himselfe of the verity of Catholike Religion , which is to search out the truth , and not to make himselfe , and his priuate spirit iudge of the grounds of truth , or of the truth which is to be found in thē . And this is all that can be inferred out of these places : & this may suffice for the solution of all such argumnets or obiections , as are made out of Scripture by the Protestants for the establishing of this priuate spirits power and authority to interprete Scripture , and to iudge of al controuersies of Fayth . FINIS . A TABLE OF THE PRINCIPALL MATTERS handled in this Booke . A S. Ambrose his commendations pag. 58. His authority against the priuate Spirit . pag. 59. Angells apparitions pag. 74. Difficulties about them . pag. 81. Apostles their authority to iudge of Fayth . pag. 166. Their power deriued from Christ . pag. 167. Their successors power to iudge of Faith. pag. 168. The foundation of Fayth . pag. 390. Apparitions of God , or Angells ; in what places ; to what persons . pag. 75. Apparitiōs of Diuels in diuers shaps ; of beastes ; of men ; of Angells ; of Christ ; of the B. Trinity . ibid. & 140. Of soules in Limbo , Purgatory Hell and Heauen . pag. 77.78 . Difficulties to know which be apparitions of God , Angells , Diuells , soules . pag. 79. Apparitiōs of Sathā inward by suggestions , pag. 98. By imaginary illusions . pag. 102. By exteriour visions pag. 104. S. Augustine commēded , against the priuate spirit . pag. 61. For the profundity of holy Scripture , and authority of Fathers . pag. 64. For necessity of Fayth . pag. 182. agaynst Circles . pag. 210. B BIshops and Priests , their office pag. 153. Their authority to iudge of Religion . pag. 162. Their Tribunal & power in the old Law , the beginning , progres , & end . pag. 162. In the law of Christ . pag. 165. What their authority is . pag. 166. Their authority proued by scripture . pag. 168. How for it extends . ibid. Their authority for euer . pag. 168. In all Councells . pag. 170. C CAluin his saying against the priuate spirit pag. 36.64 . His Circle between the spirit of euery man , & a Councell . pag. 215. His doctrine of the doctrine of saluation . pag. 234.239 . Of saluation of Infants without Baptisme . pag. 235. Of Christs sinne , and despaire on the Crosse . pag. 257. Of the B. Trinity . pag. 304 Of Christs Diuinity . pag. 305. Of Christs descent into Hell. pag. 308. Of his Ascensiō pag. 3●0 . Of beatitude before the day of Iudgment . pag. 311. Cases of Conscience , for feare of sinne in vaine according to Protestant doctrine ▪ pag. 26● . Catholikes aduātage aboue Protestants . pag. 24. In the habit of faith . p. 15. In the credible testimonies of Vnity , Sanctity , Vniuersality , Succession , Miracles , Examples . pag. 27. In the infallible Church-authority . pag. 28. Catholikes belieue all Reuelations , ancient , generall , infallible . pag. 25. Catholikes may challenge all which the Protestants may . pag. 28. Yea the priuate spirit . pag 29. Differēce between iust Catholikes & Protestants . pag. 266. Good life-confessed in the auncient , and late Catholikes , in the people and the Clergy . pag. 347. Catholike and Protestant doctrine compared in giuing more honour to God , to Christ , to Saints , Angells , Scripture , Sacraments , to Church , Fayth , Good workes &c. pag. 350. Christ , by Protestant doctrine no generall Redeemer . pag. 248. No perfect Redeemer from sin , & his suffering of Hell paynes due to sin . pag. 249. No Sauiour from sinne , Sathan , sensuality , the curse of the Law , or from Hell. pag. 250. No perfect Phisitian . pag. 251. No law giuer . 252. An vniust iudge . 253. No Priest , or offerer of Sacrifice . 254. Made ignorant , 256. Sinfull ▪ & suffering hell paines . pag 257. Christian Assēblies in the Primitiue Church , in what manner they were for that tyme. pag. 382. Church-authority necessary to fayth . pag. 10. infallible 11. proued by Scripture . pag. 16. Church , selected , priuiledged , armed , established &c. obligeth , p. 12. It consists of Pastors . Ibid. Is proued by Fathers & reason . Ibid. Necessary to expound Scripture . pag. 125. Church-practice A rule to confute heretikes . pag. 125. Church-pr●position and scripture-authority no circle . pag. ●02 . Vpon Church falling & failing frō faith what absurdities do follow , vz. That all anciēt Concels , & Doctors were Antichristiā : That Prophesies are false . pag. 231. That Turkes , Iewes , Gentils , haue a more credible Church , then Christians . pag. 230. Church-practice , a meanes to interpret Scripture & iudge of Doctrine pag. 125. Church of Christ a Congregation of great sinners . pag. 26● Circle , what it is . pag. 198. Difference betweene a lawfull & vnlawfull Circle pag. 199. And betweene a Circle , as obiected against Catholikes and Protestants . pag. 200 Catholikes Circle cleared as being partiall in diuers kinds of causes , and to diuers sorts of persons ▪ pag. 202. Protestants Circle between the Scripture and the Spirit . pag. 206. Betweene the Spirit & Fayth . 210. Betweene Election and Scripture . 212. Betweene the Spirit of euery person , and of a Councell . pag. 215. Protestāts Circle vnto the same kind of cause , and that totally . pag. 208. Absurdities that follow vpon it . pag. 212. Councells 3. of the Iewes in Christs tyme. pag. 164. How the holy Ghost assisted or fayled in them . pag. 164. Councells a meanes to interpret Scripture . 128. Councells haue byn a meanes to iudge of Fayth . pag. 171. Concupiscence made originall sinne , and what followes thereon . pag. 227. D DIuells . Apparitions of them . pag. 75. Difficulties to know them . pag. 80. Signes to know the motions of them . 83. Their subtility 95.97 . Their deluding of Heretickes auncient & moderne . pag. 95. Their tempting to sin , & to vertue 99. Examples of their apparitions to Heretickes . pag. 100. By imagination & visibility . pag. 10● . F FAyth . Six meanes to Fayth . pag. 3. Materiall formall obiect proposition . Ibid. Credible Testimonies , pious disposition , habit . pag. 4. Reuelation to the Apostles . Ibid. Necessity of a proponent cause Ibid. Credible Testimonies . pag , . 4.7 . & 192. Fayth requires a pious disposition supernaturall , & frees an infused habit permanent , not perpetuall pag. 6 The order of these helpes , vz. credible Testimony , Church-proposition , grace actuall , infused habit , reuelation . pag. 7.8 . The Resolution of Faith , dispositiuè , deriuatiué , eff●ctiuè , formaliter . pag. 8. Shewed by the Samaritan womā and Christ pag. 9. The helpes to Fayth , external , eternall , internall , pa. 14. Wanting in Protestants , 15. Fayth depends vpon authority . pag. 117. Faith required to know scripture & the sense of it . p. 118.120 . The rule of Fayth . pag. 146. Fayth , one . pag. 183. Certaine . 187. By preachin● and hearing . 190. By credible testimonies . 192. Obligeth to acceptance . 194. Speciall Fayth , how certaine in Protestants . 185. Fayth is of eternall verity , and presupposeth the obiect . pag. 228. Cannot stād with certainty of saluatiō , 233.240 . vide Sole fayth . Fayth by hearing , preaching , and mission pag. 190. Sole Fayth , a Protestant Principle , the effect of it . pag. 227. Sequells of Iustification by sole Fayth . p. 222. makes Protestants more certaine of their saluation then was Christ . 233 Makes Protestants as iust as Christ . 234. makes all men to be saued . 235. Is not grounded vpon Gods word . 233. Is false , contradictory ▪ sinnfull , rash , presumptuous , preiudicious to Hope , Charity , and Good life . pag. 243. is iniurious to Christ as a Redeemer , a Lawgiuer , a Iudge , a Priest ; makes him ignorant , sinfull , and damned ▪ pag. 247. Fathers , how esteemed by S. Augustine . pag. 67. Their consent a meane to interprete scripture . pag. 126. Their authority , how great . 12● . Their ancient Practice against Heretikes 227. Alleadged by Fathers and councells . ibid. consulted about scripture . pag. 138. Freewill takē away by Protest . doctrine of Predestination . pag. ●74 . Absurdities following vpon the deniall of Freewill . ibid. G GOd , by Protestant doctrine made Author of sinne , a Sinner , only a sinner , pag. ●77 . A lyer and dissembler . pag. 280. A Tyrant more cruell then any Tyrant . 284. A Diuell , a tempter to sinne , and Authour of sin . p. ●89 . Gods of the Pagās , how many , how vicious , how begot . pag. 220. Men-Gods , Women-Gods . 2●1 . Gods for euery thing : The Gods of the Romans . 2● . Passions , Beasts , Hearbes made Gods. pag. 223. Grace , generall , actuall , necessary pag. 30. How Protestants and Catholikes agree & differ about Grace pag. 31. And the effects of it . pag. 32. Grace , gratis , and extraordinary . pag. 40.378 . Not giuen to all . 380. Not a signe of Holines pag. 119. H K. HENRY the 8. how often he changed Religion . pag. 157. Heresy , what it worketh . pa. 20.56 . Why to be auoyded . 48. The origine of it . pag. 2.49.61.225 . Begon by the priuate Spirit . pag. 141. Compared with Idolatry . pag. 218. Heretikes , how they abuse Scripture . 58. How deluded by Sathan 100.102 . Examples of auncient Heretikes . 10● . Moderne . 100.103 . How discerned by Fathers , by practice of the Rule of Fayth . pag. 120.127 . By Church practice confuted . 1●5 . Deceaued by women . pag. 46. S Hierome commēded . His saying against the priuate Spirit , pag. 59. I IVdge , as necessary in Fayth , as in Lawes : How far he is to be obeyed . pag. 145.161 . What properties are required in a Iudge , and what to a Rule of Fayth , by which he is to iudge . pag. 146. Not the whole body of the Church pa. 147. Not secular Prines . 148. Not the lay people . 155. Not the Scripture . 156. But Bishops and Prelats , as is proued by scripture & Church-practice , are a Iudge . pag. 162. L LAy-People , not Iudges of Faith. pag. 155. Lawes , Precepts , Instructiōs , & Exhortations all in vaine according to Protestant doctrine . pag. 162. Luther against this priuate Spirit . 65. His bad Life , Lust , Enuy , Pride , want of deuotion and good workes confessed . pag. 339. Lutherans disagreemēt about Scripture-sense . pag. 140. O OBiections for the priuate spirits authority answered . pag. 378. Originall sin , made to be Concupiscence . pag 227. Absurdities that follow vpon Originall sinne remaining . pag. 259. That the Church of Christ is a congregation of great sinners . pag. 261. That the elect may commit as wel great sinnes as good workes . ibid. That in vaine is all mortification and labour to ouercome all Temptations , ibid. That great sinners may be perfect men , and perfect Protestants . pag. 261. That in vaine are al Lawes of Gods Church or Cōmon Welth. p. 6● ▪ All Consultatios , exhortations , all Case● or care of Conscience vaine . ibid. P PAgans saued , according to Protestants . pag 242. Predestination to damnation a Protestant Principle , and the effect of it . pag 2●8 . Absurdities that follow of it , vz It makes men Atheists . pag ●71 . Desperat● Examples of both . pag. ●72 Takes away Freewil in all sort of actions : All desert of reward or payne . 274. Makes God the Author of sin ●76 . A sinner . 277. Vide God. And is the origine of Atheisme and liberty pag 27● . Priests & Pastors of the Church are interpreters of Scripture . pag. 117. And the triers of Spirits . pag. 1●7 . 118 . Princes , not Iudges of cōtrouersies and Fayth , pag 148 They are sheep , not Pastours , proued by Fathers pa. 149. Absurdities that follow vpon making them Iudges of Fayth . pag. 153. Protestants , want all means of Faith to confute Pagans , confirme Catholikes , and reduce Heretickes , pag. ●5 . Want all credible Testimonies to the same , pag 17. All Church infallible proposition , 19. All pious disposition , ibid. All infused Fayth . pag. ●0 . Obiects Materiall and formall , ●1 . All reuelation made to the Apostles , pag. 23. Protestants relye vpon a motion of the priuate Spirit , pag. 25. In what they agree with Catholikes , pag. 30. And differ from them , about the Spirit in the Name , Vniuersality , Operation , Permanency , and effect of it . pag. 30. What they belieue of the Spirit . pag. 30.31 . How they make the Spirit Iudge and trier or Councells , pag. 36. Protestants compared with false Prophets , pag. 44. With Eliu Iobs friend , 47. Protestants Faith & Saluation how doubtfull : as relying on the priuate Spirit , p. 14● . And more doubtfull then Catholikes ibid. Sects and diuisions among them , 184 Protectants doctrine in the connexion of their electiō , faith spirit , Scripture-sense , & saluation , pag. 205. Their Circle between scipture and spirit , pag. 206. Betweene spirit and Fayth , pag. 201. Betweene Election & scripture-sense , 21● . How they make Scripture the sole meanes of Fayth , and the spirit the sole meanes to know scripture , 2●7 . 2●1 212. Protestants doctrine reduced to 4 heads , that is ▪ Church-contempt , sole Fayth , originall sin , and Predestination . pag. ●26 Their doctrine of the certainty of saluation , how contrary to Faith , and inferring a Generall saluation of all , pag 2●7 Their doctrine of Fayth what it is , and how contradictory 243. Vide Fayth . Not grounded vpon scripture , 243.245 . They are made Iust by sinne . 244. Presume vpon Iustice without ground , 245. Destroy all hope and charity , 246. Teach good life , not out of their owne principles , 247 Make Christ no redeemer nor Phisitian of soules . Vide Christ , and pag. 247. &c Their doctrine and scripture , in how many points contra●y , pag 280 ▪ How it leads to bad life , to flouth , lust , and cruelty , pag. 330. Derogates frō the honour of God , of Christs saints Sacraments , Grace , &c. p 350 Protestants Church of what kind of persons it consists , 260. Their doctaine of sin and good workes , pag 261. The bad life of the Protestant common people confessed in Germany , pag. 335. In England , 337 Of their Ministers , 338. Of their Founders Luther , Caluin , Swinglius , Iacobus Andreas , &c. pag. 344 Protestant Reformers most of them Friars , Priests , & Breakers of the vowes of Chastity , pag. 346 ▪ S SEcts and diuisions , how many mong Protestants , pag. 184. Selfe-opinion and conceite cōdemned , pag. 50. Sinners perfect Protestāts , pag. 261. Good members of their Church , p. 261. Spirits , diuers and doubtfull , not sy to be discerned , but by speciall gift , pag. 35. By what Rule to be tryed , ibid. By vniō with the Church not by Scripture , pag. 36. By whome to be tryed ; that is , by the Pastors , not the people , pag. 39. Spirits their variety and diuersity in nature , cōdition & operation , pag. 70. Spirits vitall and naturall , pag. 71. Spirituall motions their origine , pag. 7● . some spirituall , some sensible , pag. 73. Spirits of God , of Angells , of Diuells , of soules departed , how hard to be discerned , pag. 74. Rules to discerne their motions , pag. 83. Difficulty to iudge certainly of these Rules , pag. 93. In respect of mans infirmity , and Sathans subtility , 93. Signes of good Spirits , 89. Differēce betweene good and bad spirits , ibid. How hard to discerne them by scripture , pag. 109. Not to be discerned by all faythfull , ibid. Spirituall maisters necessary , pag. 111. Spirit of God , the Interpreter , as wel as the maker of scripture , p. 38.39 . Gods Spirit how it worketh in euery one , and what it is , 373. How it differs in Catholicke & Protestant doctrine in the exposition of scripture and certainty of saluation , pag. 37. Spirituall men , how they iudge of all things , ibid. Priuate Spirit the mother of all heresies , pag. ● . May be chalenged as well by Catholikes as Protestants , pag. ●8 . What it worketh , pag. 30.34.38 . Confuted by Scripture , pa. 34. Why not to be belieued , ibid. Why it cannot be a Iudge , pag. 37. What it is , in whome it is , what it worketh , how it is punished , pag. 46. Is blind , lying , deceytfull , pag. 44 Is confuted by scripture out of S. Iohn , S Paul , S Peter , Exechiel , Iob , and other scriptures , pag. 33.40.48.50 . By Fathers in the six first ages after Christ , pag. 55. A Puritā spirit described out of Iob , pag 47 ▪ Is only a selfe opinion , pag. 50. The priuate spirit cannot discerne the difficulties about the Spirit of good Angels , soules , diuels , pag. 80. cānot discerne spirits good or bad , pag. 112. cannot be meanes to interprete scripture , 1●1 . cānot explicate what bookes are scripture , in what language , figures , what seeming contradictions , what difficult places . 131. Priuate Spirits exposition of scripture is against scripture , false , fallible , contrary to the spirit of Gods Church , and author of all heresies , pag. 1●6 184 It cannot be a Iudge as not able to know , & be knowne , pag 17● . It wants authority . 174. Infallibility , 175 Certainty , ibid. & ●8● . Duration , immutability , Visibility , Vni●y , pag. 178.188.176 . Vniuersality , warrant to be obeyed , pag. 178. Priuate Spirit is the Protestāts sole groūd of scripture sense , faith & saluation , pag. 182. Authour of al sects , 184. Vpon what ground it relyes , pag ▪ pag. ●87 . Teaches & directs Protestants all in all , pag. ●91 . Cannot oblige others to beleeue any thing , 195. It can giue no credible testimonies of beliefe , pag. 195. Cānot make a knowne and visible Cōgregation , 188. Nor teach an entyre & vniuersall Fayth , pag· 186. T TEntations , vaine to ouercome them by mortification , or labour according to Protestāts , pag. 26● . V VNity wanting in the priuate spitit of Protestants , pag. 178.188.176 . Vniuersality also wanting in the same , ibid. Visibbility , a like , ibid. W WOmen , seducers of ancient and later tymes , pag. ●●6 . VVorkes neither hinder damnation , nor help to saluation , according to Protestants , pag. ●61 . FINIS . Faultes escaped in the printing . PAge 5. line 2. adde it . pag. 6. l. 20. in , read is . pag. 24. l. 16. haue , read hath . pag. 26.29 . is read as . pag. 34. l. ●7 . him read them . pag. 63 l. 23. glorify , read glory . pag. 76. l. 21. adde to . pag. 103. l. 22. adde her ▪ pag. 104. l. 30. dele to . Ibid. l. 32. his read her . pag. 107. line 33. after men , adde of which first S. Paul 1. Cor. 12. pag. 117. l. 22. after force adde of reason . pag. 121. l. 31. of read from . pag. 123. l. 14. whome read them , p. 129. l. 16. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . Ibid. l. 27 dele in . pag. 136. l. 31. Act. 15 12. read Act. 13.21 . pag. 152. l. 3. dele S. Ibid. l. 1● . read were not thus . pag. 163. lin . ●4 . dele and. pag. 174. lin . 10. vnity read vntye . pag. 183. lin . 15. adde First . pag. 187. lin . penult . Heretickes read Hereticke . pag. 194. lin . ● . more read most . pag. 198. lin . 23. read knowne after and vnknowne , as &c. pag. 208. lin . ●3 . affection read assertion . pag. 209. lin . 22. therfore read before pag. 210. l. 13. the read their . pag. 215. l. ●9 . spirit read spirits . pag. 216. lin . 10. adde to be . pag. 241. lin . 7. read so it is true that euery ones sinnes &c. pag. 24● . adde euery one . pag. 244. lin . 2● least read best . pag. 247. lin . ●0 . read lesse pardonable . pag. 250. lin . 16. dele and in the effect thereof . pag. 255. lin . 11. adde and confession pag. ●56 . lin . 2● . one read onely . pag. 259. l. penult . now , read new . pag. 260 ▪ lin . 25. pointed read painted , Ibid. lin . vlt. dele pit of . pag 263. l. 11. read that he had no freewill . pag. 269. lin . 24. free read freedome pag. 270. lin . 20. esteeme read esteemed . Ibid. lin . 28. his , read thus . pag. 288. lin . vlt. dele stel pag. 293. lin . 18. read tell him that which . pag 296. lin . 6. read in him sinne . pag. 311. lin . 22. adde to , pag. ●14 . lin . 3. read need not . Ibid. lin . 33. read from euer . pag. 320. lin . 10. neuer read euer , Ibid. l. 21. dele to . pag. 324. lin . 11. dele all . pag. 329. lin . 6. we read will. pag. 330 lin . 29. debauched , read debased . pag. 340. l. 21. read one hundred thou●and . pag. 346. lin , 14. read he is diuulged . pag. 348. lin . 4. dele by . In the Margent . PAg. 4. Mat. read Marc. Ibid. Ephes . 2.10 . read Ephes . 2.20 . pag. 5. Psal . 24.25 . read 92.5 . Ibid. Philip. 2.33 . read 2.13 . pag. 11. Eph. 25.29 . read Ephes . 5.27 . pag. 12. Matth. 20.10 . read 28.19 . Ibid. Matth. 15. read Marc. 16.15 . pag. 15. confirme read conuert . pag. 50. Iob. 12. read Prou. 1● . pag. 60. Ep. ●6 . read 60. pag. 65. read Tom. 7. cont . Iulian . l. 1. c. ● . pag. 104. 3. Reg. 12. read 3. Reg. 22. pag. 182. Aug. serm . 8. read 8● . Other Faultes , if any haue escaped , it is desyred of the gentle Reader to correct them by his owne iudicious reading ; the Author being far absent from the Print , and forced to commit the same to strangers . Notes, typically marginal, from the original text Notes for div A12062-e2970 Hierom. Six meanes or helpes to attain faith 1. The material obiect what we do belieue . 2. The formall obiect or reuelatiō why we belieue . (a) Ioan. 15.15 . (b) Mat. 16.15 . (c) Eph. 2.10 (d) 2. Thes . 2 14. 3. The proponēt cause declaring the certainty of what , and why we belieue . 4 Credible Testimonies to conuince the Vnderstanding , of the probability of fayth . (e) Psal . 25 Eccles . 15.4 . Luc. 24.25 . The pious disposition of the will disposed by grace to giue consēt to the verity . (f) Phi. 2.23 . (g) Phi. 16. (h) Mar. 16.26 . (i) Act. 28.24 . (*) Matt. 23 37. The guift or habit of faith cocurring to the act of assent or beliefe . (k) Heb. 11.3 . (l) Rom. 1.17 . (m) Ibid. (n) Rom. 10.10 . (o) Rom. 5.1 (p) Ioan. 12.42 . (q) 1. Cor. 13 24. (r) 1. Tim. 1.20 . 2. Tim. 2.17 (s) 1. Tim. 6.10 . (t) 1. Tim. 10.19 . (u) Heb. 6 5. The order & manner of operatiō of rhe six meanes of fayth . 1. Credible testimonies persuade . 2. The churches authority proposeth . 3 Grace inclin●th the will. 4. The habit of faith enableth the Vnderstanding to belieue the articles reuealed , and the reuelation of them . How fayth is resolued Dispositiuè . Directiuè . Effectiue . Formaliter . (w) Ioan. 4.39 : (x) Vers . 42. Effects of Fayth . The necessity of these six meanes of Faith. Of credible testimonies Of the pious disposition of the habit of Fayth . Of the materiall obiect . Of the formal obiect . Of the proponēt cause (y) Rom. 10 17. Infallibility Aug. de vtil . credendi . Which is church proposition . (a) Psal . 32 12 (b) Matt. 28 1.20.20 . (c) 1. Cor. 13.16.17.19 . (d) Cant. 4.8 Ioan. 3.19 . (e) Ose . 2. (f) 2. Cor. 11.2 . (g) Rom. 12.5 . Eph. 4.4 (i) Ephes . 5.25.29 . (k) Act. 20.28 . (l) Mat. 28.20 . (m) Ioan. 14.16 . (n) Esa . 59.21 . (o) Ioan. 14.16 . (p) Ioan. 16 13. (q) Matt. 16 18. (r) 1. Cor. 4.21 . (s) 1. Cor. 5.3 . (t) Act. 15.28 . (u) 1. Tim. 3 15. (w) Matt. 16.18 . (x) Matt. 15 15. (y) Luc. 10.16 . (z) Matt. 13 2. (a) Luc. 10.16 . (b) Matt. 18 17. (c) Mar. 16.16 . The church that is , the pastours of it . (d) Ephe. 4.11 . (e) Ier. 3.15 (f) Rom. 10. (g) Rom. 10.14 . Church propositiō cōfirmed by Fathers . Iren. lib. 3. cap. 4. Aug. lib. 1. cont . Crescō . cap. 33. Luth. de anti . Eccl. tom . 7. fol. 562. Ger. 2. part . 10.40 . The Protestants want all the meanes of faith . Externall . Eternall . Internall . Protestants want credible testimonies , which are such as either may . 1. Confirme Pagans , & these are , (h) Valentia tom . 3. dis . 1 q. 1. art . 4. pag. 87. &c. In respect of Christ . Of Christiā doctrine . Of holy Scripture . Of Christiā Professours . 2. Or may confirme Catholikes , such as are , Aug. lib. cont . epist . Funda . cap. 4. Consent . Authority . Succession . Name Catholike . (*) Aug. de vnit . Eccl. c. 7. tom . 7. Concione 2. in Psalm . 30.12 . 3. Or may reduce Heretiks , such as are , Vnity . Sanctity . vniuersality Succession . Protestants want testimonies of credibility . 1. To conuert Pagans 2. To conuince Heretikes . As vnity ▪ with the primitiue Church . Or among themselues . Sanctity of doctrine . Of miracle (n) Luth. conc 2. Domin . 1. Aduentus . (o) Becan . de fide cap. 6. num . 4. Vniuersality . Of name Catholike . Of place . Of tyme. Succession of Ordination . And Vocation . Protestants want Church-infallible proposition , in that they Disobey their Pastours . Disclaime generall Councels . And condemn their whole Church of errour . Protestants want a pious disposition of the Will. By obstinacy by which They fal into heresy . Loose their fayth . Belieue no truth by any diuine Fayth . Separate themselues frō Christ . Protestants want an infused guift of Fayth . Protestants want the material obiects , or articles of Fayth : because they belieue not Traditions , nor many partes of Scripture in which they are reuealed . Nor many articles belieued by ancient Church and Fathers . Not any article by diuine fayth . Protestants want the formall obiect of faith or diuine reuelation : As not depending vpon the reuelations made to the Apostles , but to them selues by their priuat spirit . Catholikes aduantage of the Protestants . ● . In the materiall obiect belieued , as belieuing , not only what is reuealed in scripture interpreted by their owne spirit : But what is reuealed , or declared in Scripture , Tradition , Councells , Church-practise , Fathers . 2. In the formall obiect which we make , not sense reasō , or the priuate spirit . But reuelation . Ancient . General . Continued . Infallible . 3. In the internall assistance of grace , Protestants depend only vpon a motion of priuate spirit . We vpon a permanent guift & seuerall helps of Grace . 4. In the credible testimonies , they haue none . We haue Vnity with the ancient Church . With one head . VVith our selues , Sanctity of doctrine . Sanctity of life . Of miracle● Vniuersaliry of name . Of place . Of tyme. Succession of Ordination , and Doctrine . Exampls of Martyrs , Cōfessours , Doctours , & Virgins ▪ 5. In the infallible proponēt cause they haue none at all . We haue infallible Church authority . The priuate spirit might as well be chalenged by Catholikes , as Protestants . 2. Cor. 11. ●● About the necessity of the spirit . Catholikes , & Protestants agree . Differ , 1. in the name . 2. In the vniuersality of it . 3. In the māner of operation of it . 4. In the permanency of it . 5. In the effect of it , what Catholiks assigne . What Protestants assigne . In respect of the obiect . In respect of the subiect . ●alu . 4. Inst. 17.2 . in the French editiō . Notes for div A12062-e7890 The priuate spirit not to be belieued The reason . The effect of it . (a) Act. 20.29.3 . (b) 2. Pet. 2.1 . (c) v. 2. (d) v. 10. (e) v. 14. (f) v. 19. (g) v. 18. (h) v. 20. (i) v. 21. (k) 2. Pet. 3 16. Reasōs why it cannot be belieued . (a) 1. Cor. 2 ▪ 12. (b) 1. Cor. 2.11 . (c) 7. Cor. ●·12 . (d) 1. Reg. 16.14 . (e) Ioan. 15.16 . (f) 2. Paral. 18.22 . 1. Tim. 4.1 (g) Es . 11.2 (h) Es . 19.14 . How & by what rule spirits are to be tryed . Catholikes rule . (1) 1. Cor. 12 4.11.13 . (2) Ioan. 14 16.26 . (3) 1. Cor. 12 2. Protestants rule . Cal. in 1. Ioa. 4. v. 1. Who are to try spirits according to Catholikes . According to Protestants . Conclusiō . (a) Matt. 24 4.5 . (b) 2. Pet. 2.1 (c) Ib. v. 2. (d) 2. Pet. 2.10 . (e) Ib. v. 14. (f) Ib. v. 19. (g) 2. Pet. 3.16 . (h) Ibid. (i) Act. 20.30 . The second proof out of S. Peter . The scripture is to be interpreted by the same spirit , by which it was penned (4) Ephes . 4. Chrys . hom . de spir . sanct . adorando . Clem. ep . 5. Cal. in Cōm . in hunc locum Bellar. l. 3. c. 6. de interpr . verbi Dei. Inference . Conclusiō . The third proofe out of S. Paul. The guift of interpreting scripture is gratia gratis data . It is not cōmon to all faythfull . Inferences . Matth. 7.22 Conclusiō . 4. Proofe out of Ezechiel . By whom is described . The spirit . The persōs . The effects . The punishmēt of it . The spirit of false Prophets and Protestants compared . Hierem. 29.8 . The persōs . The effects . Inferences . Women seducers . Hier. epitom . 1. epist. ad C●esiph . Conclusiō . The fifth proof out of Iob. Eliu the Busite his priuate spirit . Eliu , & the Protestants spirit alike . 3. Reg. 22.23 The sixth proofe out of S. Paul , admonishing , Who is an Heretike . Sanct. lib. 2. mor. c. 7. n. 1. Aug. ep . 162. Qui sententiam suam , quāuis falsā & peruersā , nulla pertinaci animo sitate defēdunt ; praeser tim inquam non audaciâ presumptionis pepererunt , sed à seductis & in errorem lapsis parentibus acceperunt : quaerunt autē cauta solicitudine veritatem , corrigi parati cum inuenerint , nequaquā sunt inter haereticos , deputandi . Aug. l. 18. de ciuit . Dei c. 51. Qui in ecclesia Dei morbidū aliquod prauumque sapiunt , si correpti vt sanum rectūque sapiāt , resistunt cōtumaciter , suaque pestifera & mortifera dogmata emēdare nolūt , sed defensare persistūt , haeretici fiūt & foras exeuntes , habentur in exercētibus inimicis . Aug. l. 4. de Bapt. cont . Donat. c. 16. Why an heretike is to be auoided . Tert. de prescript . cap. 6. quia in quo damnatur sibi clegit . Conclusion The 7. and last proofe out of diuers places of Script . (a) Prou. 3.5 7. (b) Iob. 12.15 . (c) Prou. 14.12 (d) Is . 5.21 . (e) Deut. 12.9 . (f) Rom. 1.22 . (g) Rom. 2.8 (h) Thes . 1.8 . Inference . (a) Is . 19.11 . (b) Apoc. 5.1.2 . (c) 2. Pet ▪ 1.20 . Aug. l. de vtilit . credend . cap. 12. Cap. 17. Cap. 7. Bellarm. l. 3. c. 6. de interp . ●erbi Dei. Notes for div A12062-e12370 What Fathers are cited . Aug. tom . 7. contr . Iuliae . pelag . l. 1. c. 2 Sed pauca paucorum , quibus tamen nostri contradictores coguntur erubescere , & cedere , fi vel in ijs Dei timor , vel ●ominum pudor , tantum malum peruicaciam superauerit . What authority they haue . What proofes they bring . Testimonies of the Fathers in the first age (a) Clem l. 10. recognit . Obseruadū est , vt cùm lex Dei legitur , non secundum proprij ingenij intelligentiā legatur : sunt enim multa in diuinis scripturis , quae possunt trahi ad eū sensū , quem sibi vnusquisq , spōteprae sumit : sed fieri nō potest . In the secōd age . (b) Iren. Vnusquisque fictionem quam à semetipso adinueuit , illam esse sapientiam dicit , seque indubitaté , incontaminatè , & sincerè absconditum scire mysterium . (c) Tertul. l. de prescrip . c. 42. fol. 400. which booke he wrote an . 197. Vnusquisque pro suo arbitrio modulatur quae accepit , quemadmodum de suo arbitrio composuit qui tradidit . (d) Idem cap. 38. fol. 399. Quibus propositum fuit aliter docendi , eos necessitas coegit aliter disponendi instrumenta doctrinae : vnde autē extranei & inimici Apostolis haeretici , nisi ex diuersitate doctrinae , quam vnusquisque suo arbitrio , aut protulit , aut recepit ? (e) Idem c. 4. f. 49. Qui lupi rapaces , nisi sensus & spiritus subdoli , ad infestandum gregem Christi intrinsecus delitescentes ? (f) Idem c. 1 Haereticus destinari potest is , qui deserto quod prius fuerat , id postea fibi elegit quod retrò nō erat . Idem . Haereses dictae graecâ voce ex interpretatione Electionis , quâ quis siue ad instituēdas , siue suscipiēdas eas vtitur : ideo & damnatū sibi dixit Haereticum , quia in quo damnatur sibi elegit : Nobis verò nihil ex arbitrio licet inducere , sed nec ●ligere quod alius de arbitrio suo indux●rit . (g) Idem . lib. 2. cont . Marc. cap. 2. (h) Id. lib. 4. ad Marci . cap. 4. Humanae temeritatis , non diuinae authoritatis est haeresis negotiū , quae sic semper emendat Euangelia , dum vitiat . (i) Idem de praescrip . c. p. 17. fol. 393. Nihil proficit congressio scripturarū , nisi planè vt stomachi quis ineat auersionem aut cerebri . quid promoue bis exercitatissime Scripturarum cùm fi quid defenderis , negatur ex aduerso ; fi quid negaueris , defendatur : & tu quidem nihil perdes nifi vocem in contentione , nihil consequeris nifi bilem ex blasphematione . Valent. non materiā ad scripturas , sed scripturas ad materiam excogitauit . fol. 399. c. 38. (k) Aug. de Genes . ad literam lib. 1. cap. 18. (l) Clem. Alex . libr. 3. Quanquā ij ▪ qui haereses sectantur , audeant vti Propheticis scripturis : tamen primùm neque omnibus vtuntur , neque integrè , sed quae ambiguae dictae sunt intelligentes , transferunt illas in priuatas suas opiniones . In the 3. age (m) Aug. l. 2. de doct . Christ. c. 42. (n) Cyp. de vnit . Ecclesiae . Christianos se vocant , & ambulantes in tenebris , habere se lumen existimant ; blandiente aduersario atque fallente , qui secundum Apostoli vocem , transfigurat se in Angeli lucem , velut Angelum lucis , & subornat suos velut Ministros iustitiae , efferentes noctem pro die , interitum pro salute , desperationem sub obtentu spei , perfidiam sub pretextu fidei , Antichristum sub vocabulo Christi . (o) Tom. 1. epist. 55. Nemo aduersus sacerdotum collegium quidquid moueret , nemo post diuinum iudicium , post populi suffragium , post coepiscoporum consensum , iudicem se ▪ ●on iam Episcopi , sed Dei faceret . Nemo dissidio vnitatis Christi ecclesiā scinderet ; nemo ●ibi placens , & tumens s●or●im foris haeresim nouam conderet ▪ (p) Idem . ep . 65. Haec initia Haereticorum , & ortus , atque conatus Schismaticorum malè cogitātium , vt sibi placeant , vt praepositum superbo tumore contemnant ▪ ab Ecclesia receditur sic , altare foris collocatur , pacē & ordinationem & vnitatem relinqunt . (q) Tom. 3. praefat . de Card. oper . Tā in diuinis quam in philosophorum doctrinis , nec tutū , nec honestum in●ruditos , & ignaros sēsuum ad literas illas pertinentium , consilire ad discussionem eorum quae nesciunt , & de his sibi vsurpare magisterium quae ignorant . In the fourth age . (r) Aug. tom . 7. cont . Iulian. lib. 1. c. 2. (s) Amb. in Tit. cap. 3. Haeretici sunt , qui per verba legis , legem impugnant : proprium enim sens●m verbis astruunt , vt prauitatem mentis suae legis authoritate commēdent . (t) Magni periculi res est , si post tot Prophetarum oracula , post Apostolorum testimonia , post Martyrum vulnera , veterem fidem quasi nouellam discutere praesumas ; & post tam manifestos duces in errore permaneas , & post moriētium sudorem otiosa disputatione contendas : veneremurergo in Sanctorū gloria fidē nostram . (u) Prosp . lib. de ingrat● . (w) Aug. ep . 903. ad Hier (x) Oros . lib. 7. hist. c. 43. (y) Dam. ep . 124. (z) Hier. ad Paulin. ep . 2. Haeretici quidquid di xerint legē putant , nec scire dignātur quid Apostoli quid Prophetae sēserint , sed ad suum sēsum incongrua aptant testimonia , quasi grande & non vitiosissimum docendi genus , deprauare sententias , & ad voluntatem suam scripturam trahere rēpugnantem . (a) Idem in cap. 5. Amos. & 10. Ose tom . 5. Haeretici adeo acumen & sensus ingenij percipientes , vt bona naturae in Dei cultum verterent , fecerunt sibi ex his idola : nullus autem potest haeresim struere , nisi qui ardentis est ingenij , & habet dona naturae : talis Valentinus , Marcion , isti quia terrae bona verterunt in titulos mortuorum , quia omnis doctrina eorum non ad viuentes refertur , sed ad mortuos , tam eos quos colunt , quam quos despiciunt . (b) Idem tom . 4. in 8. Ose . Sermones & sensus sacros verterunt in Idola , quae de suo corde finxerunt . (c) Idem in c. 4. Os . tom . 1. Perdito mentis iudicio , adorant idola quae de suo corde finxerūt : fornicationis spiritu possidentur . (d) Sensus , & eloquia Scripturae Haeretici posuerūt infomentum superstitionis , & imagines diuersorum dogmatum & abominationes offendiculorū suorum fecerūt ex ijs . (e) In 5. Dan fol. 45. Haeretici assumunt prophetarum verba , & testimonijs diuinae scripturae vtuntur ad suum sensum , & dant bibere his quos decipiūt , & cum quibus fornicati sunt . (e) In cap. 5. Os . Omnes gentiliū & Haereticorum questiones eaedem sunt , quia non scripturarum authoritatē sed humanae rationis sequūtur . (g) In Ez. 16. tom . 4. Nostra Hierusalem visio pacis ab haereticis scinditur , quando vnum laterum testimonium scripturae de proprijs carpentes locis conantur assuere his , quibus non queunt coaptare : vae qui suunt ceruicalia sub omni cubito . (h) In Ezech. 13. tom . 4. Vae Haereticis his , qui doctrinis requiem pollicentes , omnem aetatem , sexumq , decipiunt , vt capiant animas miserorum propter pugillum hordei , non panem integrū , seu solid a testimonia scripturarum , sed quae haeretica prauitate fracta , dissecta , & sanctos quosque decipiunt , & ad mortem trahunt , & peccatores varijs promissionibus consiliare contendunt . (i) Epist. 16. ad Ioan. Hieros . Manichaei , Marcion , Hebion , Gnostici , quae de purissimo scripturarum fonte assumunt testimonia , non ita interpretantur vt scripta suut , sed simplicitatem sermonis Ecclesiastici id volunt significare quod ipsi sentiunt . (k) In Os . 9. Aliqui qui se Deum videre iactant , & non spiritu sancto reguntur ; sed daemoniaco in partes varias circūferente &c. In 1. Gal. tom . 6. Philomelam Apellis virginem Angelus quidam diabolici spiritus & peruersus impleuit . (l) In Gal. 5. tom . 6. Haeresis ad opera carnis refertur , graecè ab Electione dicitur , quod scilicet eam sic sibi eligit vnusquisque disciplinam , quā putat esse meliorem . quicunque aliter scripturam intelligit quam sensus Spiritus sancti flagitat , Haereticus appellari potest . In the 5. age (m) Euseb . l. 1. c. 27. hist. Quod sens●s scripturarū arbitratu suo interpretantur . (n) Non aliunde ortae sunt haereses quam quod quisque Haereticorum priuatā sententiam à proprio spiritu haustā cōmuni Ecclesiae sentētiae anteponat . (o) De Geness lib. 7. cap. 9. Non ob aliud sunt Haeretici , nisi quia scripturas nō intelligentes , suas falsas opiniones contra earum veritatem peruicaciter asserunt : (p) Tom. 8. Psalm . 158. Conc. 1. Diuina eloquia periculosa sunt his , qui ea velint ad cordis sui peruersitatem detorquere , haec est magna & inusitata peruersitas , quia cum debent ipsi viuere secundum voluntatem Dei , volunt viuere secundum voluntatē suam , rectam arbitrantes , non quod Deus vult , sed quod ipsi volunt . (ç) Aug. Confess . l. 12. cap. 25. Veritas tua Domine , nec mea est , nec illius , aut alius , sed omnium quos ad eius communionem publicè vocas ; terribiliter admonens nos , vt nolimus eam habere priuatam , ne priuemur eâ . Nam quisquis id quod tu fruendum omnibus proponis sibi propriè vendicat , & suum esse vult quod omnium est , à communi propellitur ad sua , id est , à veritate ad mendacium . (q) Aug. de na ● gra . c. 42. Quod scripturas ónes secundum priuatos sēsus legerunt (r) Lib. de Baptis . cont Donat. Nimis amādo sententiam suā , vel inuidendo melioribus vsque ad praecidēdae cōmunionis , & condendae schismatis vel haeresis sacrilegium peruenire diabolica praesumptione . (s) Videtis vos agere , omnis vt è medio scripturarum auferatur authoritas , & suus cuique author animus fit , quid in quaque scriptura probet , & improbet , id est , non vt authoritati scripturarum subijciatur ad fidem , sed sibi scripturas ipse subijciat . (t) Cyril . Alex l. 2. thesaur . c. 3. Probè facerent haeretici omnes , si vndique studerent verum scripturarum sensum venari , nec ad voluntatem suam omnia vert●re . (u) V●c . Lyr. commonit . Si quis videtur Propheta esse , aut spiritualis rerum ●piritualium magister , sūmo studio vnitatis & aequalitatis cultor existat , vt neque opiniones suas ceteris praeferat , & ab vniuersorū sensibus non recedat . (w) Scripturam sacram pro ipsa sui altitudine , non vno eodemque sensu omnes accipiūt , sed eadem eloquia aliter atque a●iter , alius & alius interpretatur , vt pene quot homines sunt , tot illic sententiae erui posse videantur : & id●irco multum necesse est propter tantos tā varij erroris āfractus , vt Propheticae & Apostolicae interpretationis linea secundum Ecclesiastici & catholici sensus normā dirigatur . (x) Bed. in 2. Pet. 1. Queadmodum Prophetae non sua propria , sed Dei verba scribebant , tradebant , praedicabant : ita & Lector eorum non sua propria interpretatione potest vti , nec à sensu veritatis exorbitet . Ideo dicimus , ne quis ad libitum suum scripturas exponere audeat . Beda . (z) Luth. vt Coclaeus a. 15.24 . pag. 125. Neque nos impedire debet quod alij gloriantur de spiritu , & scripturas parui faciunt . Sed , bone amice , spiritus huc , spiritus illuc : ego quoque fui in spiritu , atque etiam vidi spiritus ( si omnino de proprijs gloriandum est ) fortè plusquam illiipsi intra annum videbunt , quotiescumque etiam gloriantur ; & spiritus meus etiam in aliquo se ostendit , cùm tamen spiritus corum in angulo fit tacitus . Of Caluin . (a) Cal. l. 4. instit . 17.19 . Horribili fascino Satā mentes eorum demētauit . Sathā perturbulen tos spiritus hodie quoque molitur . (b) Calu. l. 3. Instit. 2.10 . Tot vanitatis recessus habet , tot mendacij la tebris scatet cor humanum , tam fraudulente hypocrisi obtectū est , vt seipsum saepe fallat . (c) Calu. in 1. Ioan. 41. . Multi falsi doctores titulum spiritus mentiuntur . Insurgunt multi fanatici homines qui se temere iactant spiritu Dei praeditos esse . (d) Stulti sunt qui ad honorifici tituli strepitū attoniti ▪ &c. (e) Loquuntur priuato suo nomine , prodeunt priua to suo nomine , proferunt ex proprio sensu . (f) Tom. 7. cont . Iulian. Pelag. lib. 2. prope finem . Eorum ergo appende sententias , nolo esse plures , vt eas te pigeat numerare , sed non sunt leues , vt eas dedigneris appendere , imò tam sunt graues , vt te videam sub earum onere laborare . (g) Hic sunt & ceteri , quorum te mouere debet tanta consensio . non est ita , sicut stylo maledico scribis , conspiratio perditorum : in Ecclesia Catholica , doctrinae sanae studijs claruerunt spiritualibus armis muniti , & accincti : strenua contra Haereticos bella gesseruut : perfunctis fideliter suae dispensationis laboribus in pacis gremio dormierunt . (h) Finge te nescire quid dicunt Ecclesiae sanctae tot tantique Doctores , qui vita optimè gesta debellatisque suorū temporum erroribus , gloriosissimè de hoc saeculo , antequam vos ebulliretis , exierunt . (i) Tom. 7. cont . Iulian. Pelagianum lib. 2. prope finem . Verū etsi tales nō fuerunt in his causis , quas ad s● delatas , & inter partes cognitas , cū hic viuerēt , suo iudicio definierunt ; ad hanc tamen causam tales erant , quando de illa sententias protulerunt : nullas nobiscum , vel vobiscum amicitias vel attenderunt , vel inimicitias exercuerunt , neque nobis neque vobis irati sunt ; neque nos neque vos miserati sunt : quod inuenerunt in Ecclesia , tennerunt ; quod didicerunt , docuerūt ; quod à Patribus acceperunt , hoc filijs tradiderunt . Nondum vobiscum apud istos iudices aliquid agebamus , & apud eos acta est causa nostra : nec nos nec vos eis noti fueramus , & eorum pro nobis latas contra vos sententias recitamus ; nondum vobiscum certabamus , & eis pronuntiantibus vicimus . (k) Tom. 7. cont . Iulian. P●lag . lib. 1. cap. 2. circa medium . Quod credunt , credo ; quod tenent , teneo ; quod docent , doceo ; quod praedicant , praedico . Istis cede , & mihi cedis ; acquiesce istis , & quiescis à me : postremò , si mihi per eos amicus fieri non vis , saltem peto , ne per me illorū efficiaris inimicus : sed quomodo non efficieris , si in isto errore permanseris ? Quantum ergo meliùs , vt his accedas , ab illo recedas ? Tantùmne apud te possunt Pelagius & Caelestius , vt à solis ortu vsque ad occasum , tot ac tantos Catholicae fidei Doctores , & defensores antiquos , & nostrae aetati contiguos , dormientes & manentes , non solùm deserere , verum etiā Manichaeos audeas appellare ? (l) Tom. 7. cont . Iulian. Pelagian . lib. 2. prope finem Et vsque adeo permiscuit ima sūmis longus dies , vsque adeo tenebrae lux , & lux tenebrae esse dicuntur , vt videant Pelagius , Caelestius , Iulianus ; & caeci sunt Hilarius , Gregorius , Ambrosius ? (m) Tom. 7. contra Iulian. Pelag. lib. 1. cap. 2. sub finem . Vt inuante meliore atque fortiore , te vinceres ; & animositatem , quid aliud , quàm humanam , quâ cupis tuam qualiscunque sit , quoniam tua iam facta est , praeualere sententiam , potentiore pietate superares ? (n) Ibidem . Sed istis Sacerdotibus , vel potius in eis ipsi Domino Christo , non velut qui nunc primùm veneris , traderes , fed velut qui recesseras redderes ? (o) Tom. 7. contra Iulian. Pelag lib. 2. versus f●nem . Quantò tibi essent isti Iudices optabiliores , si teneres Catholicam fidem ; tantò tibi sunt terribilio●es , quia oppugnas Catholicam fidem , quam in lacte suxerunt , quam in cibo sumpserunt , cuius lac & cibum paruis magnisque ministrauerunt , quam contra inimicos , etiam vos tunc nondum natos , vnde nunc reuelamini , appertissimè ac fortissimè defenderunt . Talibus post Apostolos sancta Ecclesia plantatoribus , rigatoribus , aedificatoribus , pastoribus , nutritoribus creuit : ideo prophanas voces ve●●rae nouitatis expauit , & cautâ ac sobriâ ex admonitione Apostolicâ ; ne sicut serpens Euam seduxit astutiâ suâ , sic & mens eius corrumperetur à castitate quae est in Christo : Catholicae fidei virginitati infidias vestri dogmatis surrepentis exhorruit , & tanquā caput colubri calcauit , obtriuit , abiecit . His igitur eloquijs & tāta authoritate sanctorum , profectò aut sanaberis , Dei misericordiâ donante , quod quantū tibi optem , videt qui faciat ; aut si , quod abominor , in eadem quae tibi videtur sapientia , & est magna stultitia , perduraueris , non tu iudices quaesiturus es , vbi causam tuam purges , sed vbi tot Sanctos Doctores egregios , atque memorabiles Catholicae veritatis accuses , Irenaeum , Cyprianum , Reticium , Olympium , Hilarium , Gregorium , Ambrosium , Basilium , Ioannem , Innocentium , Hieronymum , ceterosque socios ac participes eorum , insuper & vniuersam Christi Ecclesiam , cui diuinae familiae Dominica cibaria fid eliter ministrantes , ingenti in Dominogloria claruerunt . Aduersus hanc autem miserabilem , quam Deus auertat , insaniam , sic respondendum esse video libris tuis , vt fides quoque aduersus te defendatur istorum , sicut contra impios , & Christi professos inimicos etiam ipsum de fenditur Euangelium . Notes for div A12062-e15840 Diuersity of Spirits . Greg. lib. 4. Dial. cap. 3. In nature and essence . (a) Heb. 1.14 . (b) 1. Pet. 5. In state and condition . In worke & operation . S. Bernard . serm . de 7. spiritibus . (c) 1. Ioan. 4.2 . (d) Psal . 103 4. (e) Psal . 77.49 . (e) Psal . 77.49 . (f) Col. 2.18 (h) 1. Cor. 2.11 . (g) 1. Cor. 2.12 . Diuers sortes of apparitions . Spiritual & internall . Sensible & externall . In the imagination . By Oracles . Aug. de spir . & lit . c. 25. By Visions . (a) Act. 15. By dreames Apparitiōs of God. (a) Gen. 3. (b) Gen. 6. (c) Gen. 17. (d) Exod. 3. Gen. 6. Gen. 20. (e) Gen. 32. (f) Exod. 11. (g) Ezech. 6. (h) Isa . 6. (i) Dan. 7. (k) Gen. 21. (l) Gen. 23. (m) Iosue 2. (*) Iudic. 6. (n) Tobie 6. (o) 4. Reg. 1. (p) 2. Reg. 14 (q) Luc. 1. In what places . (r) Luc. 22. (s) Gen. 32.25 . (*) Gen. 32. (t) Iud. 6.12 (u) Dan. 3. (w) Luc. 1. (x) Act. 10. To what kind of persons . In what tymes . Apparitiōs of Diuels in the shape of beasts . Delrio disqu . lib. 2. q. 30.2 . p. 160. (a) Gen. 2. (b) Mar●l l. 5. cap. 7. (c) Iouius in Elench . (d) Hugo Flor. Chron. Pet. Clun . lib. de mir . (e) Metaphr . apud Surmense Maij. (f) Damian . in eius vitae . (g) Hieron . in Hilar. (h) Marulus lib. 5. cap. 7. (i) Athan. vita S. A● . (k) Su● . eius vita Maij mense . (l) Remig. c. 13. l. 1. daem . (m) Ioan. Nid . l. vlt. Forniicae . (n) Sozem. lib. 6. cap. 28. Of women and men . (o) Matth. 4. Beat. Vincen. mag . hist , Stel. in Lucam . Gen. concord . Caiet . 3. parte q. 7. (p) Cyp. de ador . Anast. l. 3. q. 37. 2. Reg. 28. (q) Sulpit. vita Martin . (r) Greg. 4. Dial. 10. (s) Sur. t●m . ● . Inn. 7. (*) Marul . l. 5. c. 7. Sab. exemp . lib. 10. c. 23. (t) Tyreus lib. 1. de apparit ▪ c. 5. Seba●t . Michaelis pneumat . c. 4. Binsfeld . confess . malefic . praelud . 12. (u) Luth. de Missa abrog . (w) Zuing. de supplem . Eucharistiae . (x) Luth. sup . (y) Luth. lib. cont . Carol. Of Saints , Angells , Christ and God. Of Incubi ▪ Of Chimera's . As God. As seruāts . Apparitiōs of soules in Limbo . (z) Math. 1● (a) 2. Mach. 15. (b) Eccl. 46.23 . 1. Reg. 28. (*) Aug l. de cura pro mort ● . 15 . Ambr. lib. in Luc. Basil ▪ ep . 80. martyr . (c) Greg. l. 4. dial . c. 4. & 55. (d) Bern. vit . S. Malachiae . (e) Anton. 3. p. Chron. tit . 23. cap. 7. (f) Plin. de viris illustr . (g) Plin. l. 3. cap. 2. (h) Philostr . vita Apolonij (i) Phil. in Anton. Val. lib. 1. cap 6. (k) Plin. lib. 8. epist. (l) Greg. Tur lib. 8. cap. 5. (m) Greg. l. 4. dial . c. 51. (n) Marulus lib. 1. c. 11. (o) Ado. in chron . aetat . 6 Apparitiōs of Saints . (p) Act. 9.4 . ●2 . 7.26.14 1. Cor ▪ 15.8 . (q) Ambros . Anxiat . Bafil de noua trad . Greg. in 4. psal . poenit . (r) Dion . Al. ad Demoph . (s) Sur● tom· 5.15 . Nouēb (t) Benterus chrō . hisp . c 23 (u) Greg. Nis in vita eius . (w) Greg ▪ 4. Dial. 14. (x) Ioan. Hieros . eius vita . (y) Niceph. 14. hist . 24. (z) Niceph. l. 1· hist . c. 1● . (a) Prat. spirit . c. 14. (b) Greg. Turo . gloria martyr . c. 8. (c) Greg. Tur c. 8. (d) Anton. p. 4. lit . 5. (e) Trith . l. in Monast. Herson . (f) Synod . 7. cap. 2. (g) Niss . eius vita . (h) Procop. l. 6. de aedific . Iustin. (i) Rudolph . Babēburge de veter . Princ. Germ. zelo . (k) Amb. ser . 19. de pas . S. Agnetis . (l) Oros . l. 7. cap. 36. (m) Euseb . hist . cap. 5. (n) Aug. lib. de cura mort (o) Metaphr . in Theod. martyr . (p) Niceph. 10.12 . (q) Procop. aedific . Iustin . Delrio disqu . lib. 2. q. 26. sect . 5. Difficulties in discerning of any spirit . About the spirit & apparitions of God. Of Angells . Of Diuells . Of soules departed . Difficulties of discerning spirits vpon the vncertainty of the rules of discerning them . Vincent . Ferr. tract . de vita spirit . cap. 22 Turrecremat . praefat . defens . reuelat . D. Brigittae . Carlerius p. 1. sportae fragment . Ferrar. compend . reuel . Ioan. Francis . Picus lib. vltimo de praenotion . Ribera lib. 1. vitae S. Teresae . Gerson tract . de distinct . verarum reuelat . lib. de probat . spirituum . Bonauentura proces . relig . tract . 1. Puent . dux spiritual . tract . 1. cap. 23.24 . Delrio disquisit . lib. 4. c. 1. quest . 3. sect ▪ 1. Signes of euil spirits . Rules to discerne good spirits . Puent . dux spirit . tract . 1. cap. 23.24 25. The good spirit moues to Verity . Piety . Ierem. 23.29 Sometymes in generall . Isa . 11.29 . Ambr. lib. de virginit . circa medium . Sometimes in particuler In the superiour part of the soule . With pure intention . With discretion . With a spirituall tast . (1) Psal . 33.9 . (2) Phil. 1.9.10 . (3) Ioan. 3.8 Humility . Obedience . Resignation Bonauentur . processu 7. relig . cap. 18. Peace . Difference betweene good & bad spirits . Apparitiōs . Forme . Matter . Effectes . Place . Tyme . Persons . Holy things Thyraeus de apparit . lib. 1. thes . 411. Delr . de mag . disquisit . l. 6. cap. 2. q. 3. Differences betweene inspirations and suggestions . In order of time , and season . In the end of Gods honour . In humility In confidēce in God. In mercy . In reuerence to Saints In obseruing the Cōmandements . In works of miracles , or reuelations . In the conueniency for tymes . In peace & tranquility . 1. In respect of mans infirmity to apply them : Which Cannot apply the rules of sciences . Matth. 14.26 . Mar. 6.44 . Takes inspirations for illusions . Illusions for inspiratiōs . Isa . 5.20 . Prou. 14.12 16.25 . Eccles . 8.24 . 2. In respect of Sathans subtility , who hath deceaued . (a) 1. Tim. 4.1 . (b) Chrys ho. 12. in 1. Tim 4. (c) Hier. scr . Ecclesiast . (d) Cassian . collat . 7. c. 31. (e) Clem. Ro. lib. 2 . ●ecogn . (f) Iustin. Apol. 1. (g) I●n . lib. 1. cap. 8.21.24 . (h) Epiph. de haeres . (i) Theod. l 1. & 4. fab . hist. lib. 5. c. 23. Cyril . lib. 3. Catech. Epiph. haer . 27. Caesar . l. 9. c. 12. mirab . Malmsb . de gest . Angl. lib. 3. Baron . anno 1018. Bredenb . lib. 7. collat . c. 41 Luth. lib. de abrog . missa . Zuing. de suplem . Euchar. Calu. epist. ad Bucer . (a) Luth. con . Carolost . (b) Lib. de missa angul . (c) Colloq . VVittem . an . 1537. (d) Synops . cap. 37. (e) Lib. con . Anabap. (f) Alber. lib. cont . Carol. (g) Lind. lib. de fugienda Idolatria . (h) Bark . paraen . lib. 1. cap. 3. Prou. 30 . 2● ▪ The Diuells subtilty . (a) Apoc. 16.13 . (b) Iob. 40 ▪ 11.18 . Iob. 1. ● . 1. Pet. 5. ● ▪ Iob. 1. 1. Pet. 5. 1. By inward suggestions , persuading . According to euery ones disposition . 1. To publike sinnes . 2. To memory of sins past . 3. To lesser sinnes . 4. To a security from sinne . 5. To vices in shew of vertues . 6. The 〈◊〉 and effect of the Diuels subtilty . Greg. Exampls of Sathans illusions . Of heretks . Matth. 26. Of other religious persons . Cass . col . 2. cap. 3. Cass . col . 1 . ● cap. 7. Euseb . lib. 7. hist. cap. 14. Bernar. Lutzenbergus catalog . haeret . Prateolus Elench . haeret . lib. 7. haeres . 17. Exampls of false reuelations . Euseb . lib. 3. cap. 22. & lib. 7. c. 10. Iren. lib. 1. cap. 8.9 . Euseb . lib. 5. cap. 15. Epiph. haeres . 40. Aug. ep . 165 & lib. 3. de origin● animae cap. 2. Theod. lib. 4 . ●aeret . fabul . Delrio Disquisit . lib. 4. cap. 1. q. 3. sect . 2. pag. 263. Exampls of false Christs Acosta de nouiss . tempor . lib. ● . cap. 11 Delrio Proleq Disquit . In Spaine . (a) Bernard . Fuxen . catal . lit . G. & N. In France . (b) Neubrigenfis l. 1. de rerum Britā . cap. 19. In Poland . (c) Mart. Bitl . in Anal. Guagn . in vita Sigism . Delrio disqu . lib. 2. q. 9. (d) Prateolus Lindan . Genebrad . Florimund . Gualter . an . 1600. In Belgia . (e) Delrio lib. 4. disquis . c. 1. q. 3. sect . 3 In England . Stow 3. Eliz. Ann. 1591. Elizabeth . Prou. 30.19 . The Diuells subtilty ▪ By apparitions exteriour in the shape Of men . Of Angels . Iob. 1.6.2.8 3. Reg. 12.19.22 . Zach. 1.19 . 3. Reg. 22.11 Lip. Feb. 16. out of Metaphrastes . Ephrem . vi● . Abrah . E●e . Anton. vitae Simeon Styl . Cassia . col . 2. cap. 2. Socrat. lib. 7. cap. 36. Miscel . lib. 3. Of Christ . Sulpitius Seuerus in vitae S. Martin● cap. 25. dial . 1. Greg. Turon lib. 2. de vitis ▪ Patrum , cap. 10. apud Sur. August . 1. Bonau . lib. de profect . spirit . cap. 19. Gerson . apud ●ont . supra . & Dauroltiū cap. 2. tit . 26 exempl . 3. Dionys . vita Pachomij . Pallad . c. 31. Ribadineira ●ita Ignatij lib. 1. cap. 3. Orlandinus hist. Societa● . lib. 1. c. 22. Picus Miran . de strigibus . Thom. Cantiprat . anno 1523. Bencius Annal . Societat . anno 1590. Surius 6. Iu● cap. 19. Of the B. Trinity . The difficulty to discerne spirits proued by authority of scripture . (a) Pro. 16.2 (b) 3. Reg. 8.39 . (c) Iere. 6.27 (d) 1. Ioan. 4 1. (e) Psal . 63.10 . (f) Iere. 15.19 . 2. Cor 11.14 1. Cor. 2.11.14 . Of holy men . Bernar. serm . 74. in Cant. Gers . de probat . spirituū . Difficillimū est tam multos decern●re , cùm in diuersis spiritibus multa similitudo reperiatur . Puentes dux spiritu . tract . 4. c. 2. sect . 1. Inferences . 1. What visions & apparitiōs are not to be much esteemed . (a) Num. 24.17 . (b) Ioan. 11.50 . (c) 1. Reg. 1● 6. & 2. Reg. 22.12 . (d) Matt. 1● . 2 . (e) Act. 19.13 . (f) Gen. 37.12 . (g) Ios . 5.13 . (h) 1. Reg. 3 9. (i) 3. Reg. 19 12. (k) Luc. 1.19 . Necessity of a spirituall maister . Luc. 2 . 4● . Act. 9.6 . Exod. 18 . 2● Sophron. pra . spiritua . cap. 109. Conclusion That the priuate spirit cannot be a discerner of spi●its . Notes for div A12062-e27820 VVhat interpretation of Scripture is required as necessary & infallible . Scripture abused by Sathan . Matt. ● . 6 ▪ Ioan. 7.52 . Iewes . Ioan. 19. Turkes . Marfil . Ficin . lib. de vera religione , apud Stapl. Princip . fidei controu . 7. l. 10. cap. 1. Vincent . Lyr. cap. 37. Heretikes . Matth. 7. Vincent . Lyr. cap. 36. 1. Cor. 11. Gal. 1.6 . 1. Pet. 2.3 . Ambros . ad Tit. 3. Hilar. lib 2. de S. Trinit . Hier. Coment in 1. Gal. Authority of Pastours necessary to infallible exposition of scripture . The people is to obey , not iudge his Pastour . (a) Heb. 13.17 . (b) Philip. 3.16 . (c) Coloss . 1.6 . (d) 1. Ioan. ● . 7 . (e) 1 Tim. 6.20 . (f) Gal. 1. (g) Rom. 16 17. The means to find the true sense of Scripture . 1. The rule of fayth proued . (a) Gal. 6.16 . (b) Philip. 3.16 . (c) 1. Cor. 10.15 . (d) Rom. 12.16 . (e) Rom. 16.17 . (f) Colos . 1.6 . (g) 1. Tim. 6.20 . 2 Tit. 1.3 (h) 1. Ioan. 1. (i) Gal. 1. (k) Act. 15. ● (l) 〈…〉 (m) 1. Pet. 1 1. By scripture . Isa . 7.9 . Cypr. lib. con . Iudae●s . Nihil possunt Iudaei de scripturis intelligere , nisi prius crediderint in Christum . Isaias enim dicit , Nisi credideritis non intelligetis . August . tract . 27. in Ioan. Sunt enim quidam in vobis qui non credunt , & ideo non intelligunt , quia non credunt . Propheta enim dixit , nisi credideritis non intelligetis ; per fidem copulamur , per intellectum viuificamur ; prius haeraeamus per fidem , vt sit quod viuificamus per intellectum . Fides debet praecedere intellectum , vt intellectus sit Fidei praemium . Hier. ep . ad Paulin. Lex spiritualis est , & reuelationeopus habet vt intelligatur ; & reuelata facie gloriam Dei contemplamur . Liber in Apocalypsi septē●gillis signatus ostēditur , quem si dederis homini scienti literas vt legat , respondebittibi , non possum , signatus est enim Quanti hodie putāt se nosce literas , & tenent signatum librū , nec aperire possunt , nisi ille aperuerit qui habet clauem . Eunuchus cùm librum teneret , cogitatione conauerit , lingua volueret , labijs personaret , ignorabat enim quem in libris nesciens venerabatur : venit Philippus , ostendit ei Iesum qui clausus latebat in litera , eadem hora credit Eunuchus , baptizatus , & fidelis , & sanctus factus , ac magister de discipulo . (*) Aug. cont . Faustum lib. 4. cap. 2. Non enim estis eruditi in regno caelorum , id est , in Ecclesia Christi vera Catholica : quod si essetis , de diuitijs scripturarum sanctarum , non so●um noua , sed etiam vetera proferretis . (a) Iren. l. 3. cap. 3. (b) Euseb . l. 7. c. 24. l. 5. cap. 15. (c) Socr. l. 7. cap 31. (d) Aug. de vera relig . c. 5 (e) Tertul. de praescrip . (f) Hier. d●al cont . Lucif . (g) Gregor . Nazian . lib. de Theolog. (h) Basil . de Spirit . sancto cap. 27. (i) Atha . ep . ad Epictet . (k) Epiphan . haeres . 5. (l) Haer. 75. (m) Haer. 77 (n) Aug. ep . 28. & 105. (o) Aug. de peccat . meritis lib. 3. cap. 5. (p) Lib. 1. cont . Iul. c. 1 (q) Lib. 2. c. 7. & 1. de Baptis . (r) Iren. lib. 3. cap. 3. (s) Orig. pro●mi● de principijs . (t) Aug. de haer . ad Quod vult . By reason . Stapl. contr . 6. lib. 11. c. 3. Vinc. Lyr. c. 2. Vt diuinū Canonem secundum Ecclesiae traditiones , & iuxta catholici dogmatis regulas interpretētur . Quia scripturam sacram pro ipsâ sua altitudine in vno eodēque sensu accipiunt , id circo multùm necesse est , propter tātos tam varij erroris ā●ractus , vt propheticae , & Apostolicae interpretationis linea secundum Ecclesiastici & apostolici sensus normam dirigatur . The Scripture consists of 2. parts . 2. Cor. 3.6.7 Serm. 21. de tempore . Heb. 4.12 . Rom. 1.16 . The Holy Ghost is not inherent in the letter of scripture . Aug. lib. 12. Confess . c. 18 & de Genes . ad literam . The sense of scripture to be found by the rule of Fayth . 2. The practise of the Church a meanes to interprete scripture . Epiph. haeres . 59. Basil . de spiri . sancto cap. 29 Theod haeret . Fabul . lib. 4. August . cont . Iulian. lib. 1. Aug. de bono perseuerant . lib. 2. c. 22 , & 23. 1. Cor. 10.25 . 1. Cor. 5.11 . Aug. de Baptism . contra Donat. l 2. cap. 7. Euseb . lib. 5. cap. 27. The practise of the general Councells . At●an . epist. ad Aphros . Concil . Ephes epist . ad Nest . Vincent . Lyr. cap. 41. Concil . Calc . à c. 5.6 . Concil . Const. à c. 4. Concil . Nic. 2. à c. 10. The decrees of generall Councells a meane to interprete scripture . Proued by the Councel of Nice . Athan. ep . ad Afric . Episc . By the Coūcel of Ephesus . Other profitable rules of Fayth . The priuate spirit cannot assure . Which text is scripture . Which bookes be scripture . Stapl. princ . fid . doct . Controu . 5. lib. 9. c. 5.6 . & 7. Which language the scripture was writ in . Which sense is literall . (a) Es . 7. (b) Es . 14. (c) Psalm . 71. (d) Ioan. 6. VVhich is figuratiue , and what figures are vsed . (a) Ezech. 18 20. (b) Exod. 20.5 . (c) Rom. 11.29 . (d) 1. Reg. 15 11. (e) 3. Reg. 8.9 . (f) Heb. 9 4 (g) Prou. 26.4 . (h) Prou. 26.5.1 . Wisd . 1.13 . (k) Eccles . 10 15. (l) Math. 10.10 . (m) Marc. 6.8 . (n) Ioan. 5.31 . (o) Ioan. 8.14 . (p) Ioan. 20.1 . (q) Marc. 16 2. (r) Rom. 3.18 . (s) Iacob . 2.20 . (t) Gal. 1.10 . (u) 1. Cor. 10 33. (w) Act. 9.7 . (x) Act. 22.9 . Nor explicate difficult places . VVhich are in computation of tymes . Gen. 11.12 . Luc. 3.35 . Act. 7.10 . (a) Gen. 12.4 . (b) Gen. 11.26 . (c) Gen. 11.32 . (d) Act. ● . 4 . (e) Gal. 3.17 (f) Act. 7.6 . (g) Gen. 46.26 . (h) Exod. 1.5 . (i) Act. 7.14 (k) Gen. 23.10 . Gen. 50.13 . (l) Act. 7.16 (m) Gen. 93·8 . (n) Act. 7.16 (o) Gen. 33.19 . (p) Act. 7.16 (q) Gen. 33.19 . (r) Genes . 19 (s) Gen. 48.21 . (a) 4. Reg. 8. ●● . Which are in S. Paul. Mat● . 1.2 . Luc. 3.36 . Ioan. 19. Matth. 27. Marc. 15. Which many haue doubted of . The priuate spirits exposition of scripture is , Against scripture . 2. Pet. 1.19 Vide Stapl. princ . fid . lib. 10. c. 4. pag. 36. Is false and naught . Aug. l●b . 12. Confess . cap. 25. Veritas tua , Domine , nec mea est , nec illius , autalius , sed omniū quos ad eius communionem publicè vocas , terribiliter admonens nos , vt nolimus eam habere priuatam , ne priuemur ea ; nam quisquis id , quod tu fruendum omnibus proponis , sibi propriè vindicat , & suum esse vult , quod omnium est , à communi propellitur ad sua , id est , à veritate ad mendacium . (a) Ephe. 4.3 (b) 2. Phil. 1 27. (c) 1. Cor. 14 35. (d) Ioan. 5.43 . (e) Ioan. 8.44 . Act. 20.30 . (f) Ioan. 10.10 . (g) Ioan. 3. (h) 1. Ioan. 4 2.6 . (i) Ioan. 10.5 . (k) 1. Cor. 11 (l) Deut. 11.28 . Is vncertain & fallible . Is contrary ▪ to the spirit of the Church . Calu. 3. insti . 9. Luth. primo libro contra Regem Angl. VVhitak . cōtrou . 1. q. 7. cap. 7. Is the author of all heresies . Stapl. princ . doct . l. 10. c. 4. Inferences . That the Protestant faith is doubtfull . That they rely not vpon scripture . That Catholikes do more securely depend on scripture then Protestants . Notes for div A12062-e37390 A iudge of fayth necessary . How farre the iudge of fayth is to be obeyed . The properties of a rule to iudge by . The whole body of the Church is not Iudge of fayth . Ephes . 4.7 . 1. Cor. 12.4.5 . Ephes . 4.11 . Secular Princes , Kinges , Emperours , are not iudges of faith . They are sheep not Pastours . (a) Ioan. 21.15 . (b) Ioan. 10.1 . (a) Naz. ora . ad subditos timore perculsos , & Imperatorem irastentem . Non suscipitis sermonem liberum , & quòd lex Christi vos meae potestati , meoque subiecit tribunali : scio te ouem esse mei gregis sacri sacrā . (b) Amb. ep . 31. Quid honorificentius quàm vt Imperator Ecclesiae filius esse dicatur ? Imperator enim bonus intra Ecclesiam , non supra Ecclesiam est . (c) Theod. lib. 1. hist. cap. 1. Tanquam filius amantissimus , Episcopis & Sacerdotibus velut Patribus proposuit . (d) Ruff. lib. 1. cap. 2. Vobis dedit de nobis iudicandi . (e) Euseb . lib. 4. cap. 14. Vos intra Ecclesiam , ego extra Ecclesiam à Deo constitutus sum . (f) Zozem . lib. 6. c. 3. Sibi qui vnus e numero laicorum erat non licere , se eiusmodi negotijs interponere , & ideo Sacerdotes & Episcopi quibus haec sunt , inter se conueniant . (g) Paul. Diac. lib. 7. cap. 12. Eligant Episcopos quibus nos qui gubernamus imperium , sincer● capita nostra submittamus . (h) Ambr. epist . 32. (i) Theod. l. 5. cap. 17. Se didicisse quid inter Imperatorē inter●it , & Episcopum . (k) Nic. l. 12 cap. 12. Their authority is temporall , not spirituall . (a) Athan. ep ad solitariam vitam agentes . Ne te misceas Imperator , rebus Ecclesiasticis , neque nobis inhoc genere praecipe , sed potius ea à nobis disce : tibi Deus imperium cōmifit , nobis quae sunt ecclesiae concredidit . (b) Suidas verb. Leont . Miror quomodo ad alia vocatus , alijs rebus te imisceas militaribus enim & politicis rebus praefectus , in his quae ad solo ; Episcopos pertinent praeesse vis . (c) Hilar. Prouideat tua Clementia vt ad ōnes vbique Iudices prouinciarum ad quos sola cura publicorum negotiorum pertinere debet , scribatur , ne posthac praesumant atque vsurpent cognoscere causas Clericorum . (d) Ath● . ep . ad solit . vitam agentes , versus finem . Quid hic quod Antichristi fit , omisit ? Siquidem iam denuo in locum Ecclesiasticae cognitionis suum Palatium tribunal earum causarum constituit , seue earum litium summum Principem & authorem facit . Et paul● post . Quis videns eum in decernendo , principem se facere Episcoporum , & praesidere iudicijs Ecclesiasticis , non meritò dicat illum eamipsam abominationem desolationis esse , quae à Daniele praedicta est . (e) Ambros . epist. 33. Noli te grauare Imperator , vt putes te in ea quae diuina sunt imperiale aliquid ius habere : noli te extollere , scriptum est , date quae Dei sunt Deo , quae Caesaris sunt Caesari . Ad imperatorē Palatia pertinent , ad Sacerdotem Ecclesiae . Si tractandum est , tractare in Ecclesia didici , quod Maiores fecerunt mei : ●i conferendū de fide , Sacerdotum debet esse ista collatio , ficut factum est sub Cōstantino , qui nullas leges ante praemisit sed liberum dedit iudiciū Sacerdotibus . Quando audisti , clementissime Imperator , in causa fidei laicos de Episcopo iudicasse ? Ita ergo quadam adulatione curuamur , vt Sacerdotalis iuris simus immemores ? Et quid Deus donauit mihi , alijs putem esse credendum ? At certè , si scripturarum seriem diuinarum , vel vetera tempora retractemus , quis est qui abnuat in causa fidei , in causa inquam fidei , Episcopos solere de Imperatoribus Christianis , non Imperatores de Episcopis iudicare ? Athan. epist. ad solit . vitam agentes . Si iudicium est Episcoporum , quid cum eo habeat Imperator ? Sin contra ista minis Caesaris conflantur , quid opus est hominibus titulo Episcopis ? Quando à condito aeuo auditū est , iudicium Ecclesiae ab Imperatore authoritatem suam accepisse ? aut quando vn quam hoc pro iudicio agnitum est ? Plurimae antehac Synodi fuere , multa iudicia Ecclesiae habita sunt ; sed neque Patres istiusmodi res Principi persuadere conati sunt , nec Princeps se in rebus Ecclesiasticis curiosum praebuit . Paulus Apostolus amicos in Caesaris familia habebat , non tamen eos in iudicio socios assumpsit . Theod. lib. 4. cap. 16. Nunquid cum imperio est etiam sacerdotij dignitatem Imperator consequutus ? Nos vero pastorem habemus , cuius nutum sequamur . Gelasius epist ▪ ad Anast. Nosti sili clementissime , quòd licet praesideas humano generi dignitate rerum terrenarum , tamen Praesulibus diuinarum deuotus colla submittis . Subdi te debere cognoscis religionis ordine potius quam praeesse . Nosti itaque ex illorum te pendere iudicio , non illos posse redigi ad tuam voluntatem . Greg. l. 4. ep . 31. ad Ma●● . Sacerdotes esse quosdā Deos inter homines , & propterea ab omnibus etiam Regibus honorandos . (*) Damas . orat . 2. de imagin . Non Regijs regulis , sed Patrum institutis , tam scriptis , quā non scriptis Ecclesiam censeo constitui & gubernari oportere . (a) Ruffn . lib. 1. c. 2. hist . (b) Aug. ep . 262. Sacris Antistibus veniam petitur . (c) August . epist. 32. Sacerdotes de Sacerdotibus voluit iudicare . (d) Concil . Chal. act . 3. Concilium ipsum nos docet de fide sancta , Sacerdotes quod in religione obseruari debeat perspicua decisione docuerunt . Act. 5. Non ad ostendendam potentiam , sed fidem confirmandam ad praesent●m synodum venimus , exemplo religiosi Constantini . Amb. ep 32. Nullas leges praescripsit , sed liberum indicium sacerdotibus dedit , seipsos interpretes constituit Sacerdotes . Chrysost . hom 83. in Matt. Si Dux quis piam , si Cōsul , si is , qui diademate ornatur indignè adeat , cohibe & coerce ; maiorem tu illo habes potestatem . Emperours themselues reclaime this spirituall authority . Cyril . tom . 4. ep . 17. Grat. dist . 6. c. Satis . Misit comitem Candidianum ▪ sed in nullis quae facienda sunt , de pijs dogma tib●s quaesti one● communicare . Ilucitum namque esse eum qui no est ex ordine Episcoporū Ecclesiasticis immiscere tractatibus . (ç) Heb. 5.14 (a) 1. Tim. 4 14. (b) Mat. 2.7 (*) Isa . 9.21 . (c) Luc. 21.15 . (d) Math. 10 20. (e) Luc. 10.16 . (f) 1. Ioan. 4.6 . (g) Ioan. 11.50 . (h) Aug. tra . 49. in Ioan. & 16. cont . Faust . 23. Hoc in eo egit per propheticum Chrisma , vt prophetaret hoc è vita impia , vt nesciens prophetaret . Absurdities that follow vpon regall authority to iudge of Fayth . The Lay-people are not iudges of Controuersies . (a) Mat. 13.34 . (b) Math. 13.11 . Matth. 20. Ioan. 14. (a) Act. 10.6 (b) Act. 10.42 . (c) Act. 10.43 . (d) Heb. 13.17 . (e) Act. 20.28 . (f) Math. 13 30. (g) 1. Cor. 5.13 . (h) Math. 23 3. (i) Luc. 10.16 . (k) 1. Ioan. 4.6 . (l) Rom. 10.19 . The scripture is not a Iudge of fayth . Aug serm . 7. de temp . lib. 3. de doctrina Christ. cap. 5. 2. Cor. 3.6 . The letter of scripture is not iudge as hauing deceaued , Iewes . 2. Cor. 3.15 . Heretikes . Sabellians . Ioan. 10.30 Arians . Ioan. 14.28 . Macedoniās 1. Cor. 2.10 Manichees . (a) Gen. 1.31 (b) Gen. 2.2 . (c) Gen. 1.27 (d) Ioan. 1.3 . (e) Ioan. 5.17 (f) Ioan. 8.44 . (g) Ezech. 18 20. Pelagians . (h) Rom. 5.12.16.19 . Protestants and others . The sense of scripture cānot be iudg The sense is the thing in question . Is obscure and hard . Matth. 28.19 Ioan. 3.5 . (a) Ioan. 13 14. Matt. 26 26. A Iudge is necessary as well in spiritual , as tēporall causes . Bishops & Prelates are Iudges of controuersies of faith . Deut. 17.8 . Priests , and the high Priest , were Iudges in the old law . The beginning of this tribunall . (a) Paral. 19. ●0 . (b) Num. 11 ▪ 16. (c) Exod. 18.13 . The continuance of it . (d) 2. Paral. 19.11 . (e) Mal. 2.7 . (f) Agge 2.12 . (g) Eccle. 12.11.12 . The end of it . Three Coūcels of the Iewes in Christs tym about Christ . Matth. 24. (a) Ioan. 11.49 . (b) Math. 26 ▪ 57. Prelates authority to iudge of cōtrouersies , proued out of the new Testament . Authority to iudge , giuen to S. Peter . Matt. 16.19 Matt. 16.19 Luc. 22.32 . Bellar. lib. 3. c. 5. de verb. Dei scripto . Ioan. 21.16.17 . Ezech. 34.2 . Ezech. 34.5 . Vers . 16. (a) 2. Reg. 5.2 . (b) Psal . 2.9 . (c) Ezech. 34 17. (d) Vers . 20. The same giuen to the Apostles . (e) Mat. 16.18 . (f) Luc. 22.27 . (g) Mat. 23.10 . (h) Rom. 2.20 . (i) 1. Tim. 1 11. (k) Math. 28 (l) Ioan. 1.4 . (m) Math. 5.14 . (n) Ioan. 1.17.18 . (o) Act. 1.8 . (p) Ioan. 10.36 . (q) Ioan. 17.17 . (r) Ioan. 20.21 . (s) Math. 17 5. (t) Luc. 10.16 . (u) Act. 13.47 . (w) Luc. 4.18 . (x) Act. 15.7 (y) 2. Cor. 5.19 . (z) 2. Cor. 5.19 . (a) Mat. 12.18 . (b) 2. Cor. 5.20 . Ephes . 6 20. (c) Ioan. 8.47 . (d) 1. Ioan. The same giuen to the successours of the Apostles . (e) Ephes . 4.11 . (f) Ibid. v. 12. (g) Ephes . 4.13 . (h) Ibid. v. 14. (i) 1. Pet. 5.2 . (k) Act. 20.28 . (l) Tit. 1.5 . (m) 2. Tim. 2.2 . (n) Heb. 13.17 . (o) Isa . 59.21 (p) Ioan. 14.16 . (q) Ioan. 17.8 . (r) Ioan. 17.20 . (s) Mat. 28.20 . (t) Aug. enar . in Psal . lib. 4. epist. 9. (u) Luc. 10.16 . (x) Ioan. 4.6 . (y) Cyp. epist 166. (z) Aug. lib. 4. cont . Don. cap. 43. (a) Rom. 10.15 . (b) Heb. 5.4 . (c) Mat. 18.17 . (d) Chrys . & Theophil . in hunc locum . (e) Mat. 16.18 . (f) 2. Cor. 4 19. (g) 1. Cor. 4.1 . (h) Math. 2● (i) Act. 1. Matt. 24.14 . (k) Isa . 22.22 . (l) Mat. 16.19 . (m) 1. Pet. 2.9 . (n) Luc. 17.35 . The same euer practised in the Church . In councells prouinciall . Act. 19. Ann. 255 ▪ Ann. ●19 . Ann. ●66 . In councels generall . Ann. 317. Ann. 383. Ann. 430. Ann. 454. Ann. 553. Ann. 681. Ann. 781. Ann. 870. Ann. 1121. Ann. 1139. Ann. 1180. Ann. 1228. Ann. 1265. Ann. 1274. Ann. 1311. Ann. 1439. Ann. 1512. Ann. 1563. That the priuate spirit cannot be a Iudge of controuersies of faith . The priuate spirit wants ability to know & be knowne . 2. It wants authority to iudge . (a) Rom. 8.11 . (b) Gal 4.6 . (c) 2. Cor. 5.5 . (d) Rom. 8.15 . (e) Rom. 8.16 . (f) 1. Cor. 2.10 . (g) 1. Thes . 1 6. (h) 1. Ioan. 4.1 . (i) 1. Cor. 2.15.16 . 3. It wants infallibility to iudge certainely . 4. It wants the properties ▪ of a rule of Fayth . 1. Certainty (a) 1. Tim. 3 15. (b) Math. 12 46. (c) Math. 13 44. (d) Luc. 10.16 . (e) Mat. 18.17 . (f) Ioan. 14.16.26 . 2. Duration Isa . 34.10 . Isa . 66.23 . Psalm 71.8 . Eph. 4. 3. Immutability . Duditius apud Bezam ep . theol . pag. 13. (a) Math. 16.18 . (b) 1. Tim. 3.15 . (c) Psal . 88.38 . (d) Isa . 33. (e) Isa . 21.4 4. Visibility . (a) Psal . 18. ● (b) Psalm . 8● 38. (c) Math. 5.16 . (d) Apoc. 2. (e) Math. 5 . 1● . (f) Isa . 2.2 . 5. Vanity . (a) Os . 10.2 . (b) Isa . 19.2 . (c) Luc. 11.17 . (d) Eph. 4.2 . (e) Phil. 1.27 . (f) A●t . 4.32 . (g) Ierem. 32 Ezech. 11. (h) Ioan. 14.10 . 6. Vniuersality . (a) Isa . 54.2 (b) Isa . 60.16 . (c) Isa 6● . 21 . (d) 60.6 . (e) Isa 2.2 . (f) Psal . 88. (g) Luc. 24.47 . 7. Warrant & commission . (h) Isa . 66.23 (i) Act. 1.8 . (a) Mat. 13.44 . (b) Matth. 5.15 . (c) Psal . 22.12 . (d) 1. Tim. 3.15 . (e) 1. Cor. 3.17 . (f) Cant. 4.8 (g) Rom. 12.5 . (h) Mat. 16.18 . (i) Ioan. 16.13 . (k) 1. Cor. ● 21. (l) Math. 23.2 . (m) Luc. 16.16 . (n) Math. 18 19. (o) Marc. 1● ▪ 16. Notes for div A12062-e48360 The priuate spirit is the Protestants ground of Scripture , sense , fayth and saluation . Faith necessary to saluation . (a) Heb. 11·6 . Aug. serm . 8. de tempore . Faith is one Ephes . 4.5 . Leo serm . 4. de natiuit . Iren. lib. 1. cap. 3. The priuate spirits many and cōtrary . G●alt . Cronolog . saecul . 16. & 17. Claud. Sanct. repetit . 1. de Eucharistia . Gordō . controu . 1. cap. 28. pag. 202. de Ecclesia . Caluin . Comment . in 1. Ioan. 4·1 . Hoc nostrū saeculū horrendasectarum pottēta protulit , qua occasione multi attoniti haerēt , & quorsum vertere debent nescientes , om nē pietatis curam●biecerunt . neque enim melius inuenerunt cōpendium sese extricandi ab errorum periculo . Faith is certaine . Chrisost . ho● 12. in epist. ad Rom. Luth. tom . 5. enar . in 1. Pet. 1. Calu. 3. inst . 1.16 . Zuing. tom . 1 in actus despu . Tigur . sayes : Deum Patrem tantū fauere sidelibus , ac ipsi Christo , & tamen certum essenos damna●i nō posse , quam Christum non posse . The priuate spirit most vncertaine . Fayth is entire in all points . Catholike in all persōs The priuate spirit cānot cause an entire & Catholik fayth Fayth is by hearing & preaching Rom. 10.15 . The priuate spirit ouerthrowes all hearing & preaching . Fayth by credible testimonies made probable . Eccles . 19.4 . Cap. 1. sect . 3 ▪ Psal . 92.5 . The priuate spirit destitute of any credible testimonyes . Aug. lib. cont . epist. Fund . Fayth obligeth to hear and accept the meanes of Fayth . (a) 2. Cor. 10 5. (b) 1. Pet. 1.14 . (c) Rom. 1.5 . (d) Marc. 16 ▪ 16. The priuate spirit cānot oblige to accept it . Iud. v. 12. Notes for div A12062-e50190 What a Circle is . Arist. lib. 1. posteriorum resolut . cap. 3. Arist. 2. lib. priorum resol . cap. 5. & . 18. Difference betweene a Circle lawfull and vnlawfull . The Catholikes fal not into a circle between the proofe of scripture by the Church , and of Church by Scripture . What is required to Fayth . The mutual proofe of the scripture & Church . 1. In a diuerse kind of cause . 2. Is partial and not wholy , and solely of the same . The Protastāts diuers Circles . Their gradation and conexion of doctrine , of saluation . The first Protestant Circle , betweene the scripture & spirit . Ioan. 10.27 . Psal . 11. In circuitu im pij ambulāt Aug in Psal . 139. Quis est circuitus eorum ? vt circumeant & non stēt : in gyrum eunt erroris , vbi iter est fine fine . Qui enim in longū it , aliunde incipit , alicubi finit . Qui in gyrum it , numquam finit . Ipse est labor impiorum , quē demonstrat in alio Psalmo euidentius : In circuitu impij ābulant . The second Circle betweene the spirit and fayth . A third Circle between election & vnderstanding of Scripture . Calu. in 1. Ioh. 4.1 . Multi falsi Doctores titulum spiritus mentiuntur . Insurgunt phanatici homines qui se temere iactant spiritu Dei praeditos esse . Stulti sunt qui ad solū honorifici spiritus strepitum attoniti , ipsam materiam non andent inquirere . Quiloquuntur priuato suo nomine p●odeunt in medium priuato suo nomine . Nisi adsit spiritus prudentiae parū aut nihil proderit verbum Dei habere ad manum . Penes singulos erit ius & arbitriū iudicandi Hic quoque valere det examen , quod praescribit Apostolus , vt spiritus probentur Notes for div A12062-e52670 Idolatry what it is . Heresy is a kind of Idolatry . Cyp. de vnit . Eccles . Tert praescr . cap. 40. Hier. in Ezech . 8. & in Abac. 2. Aug lib. 18. de c●uit . Dei cap. 51. Idolatry what number of Gods it begat . Clemens lib. ●ec●gnit . Petri , & itiner . Clem. lib. 10. cap. 6. Iupiter the chiefe of Gods. His cruelty . His lust . Men Gods. Women gods . Cicero de natura Deorum . Eric . de genealog . Deor. Pul●o de Dijs antiquis . Guauerra diall of Princes lib. 1. c. 22. Speciall Gods of particuler thinges . The Gods of Rome . Mens passions made Gods. Beasts made Gods (a) 1. Reg. 31 10. (b) 3. Reg. 16 31. (c) Num. 25.3 . (d) 4. Reg. 1.2 . (e) 3. Reg. 11 7. (f) 4. Reg. 15 8. (g) Iud. 17.5 . (h) 2. Reg. 17 39. (i) 3. Reg. 15 13. (k) 2. Machab . 4.19 . (l) Ezech. 8.14 . Idolatry & Heresy compared . The priuate spirit the mother of all heresies . The first daughter , cōtempt of Church authority . The second daughter sole Fayth . (a) Confess . Saxon. cap. de remiss peccat . Confess . Auglican . art . 11 Belgi● . art . 22 Bohemica art . 6. Augustan● cap. de f●de Gallica art . 20. Luther . de liber . tom . 2. fol. 4. & in Gal. 2. tom . 5. fol. 305. Calu. in Gal. 2.16 . & in Act. 13.39 . In confess . fidei pag. 109. de vera Ecclesiae reform . pag. 318. In Antidot . Concil . sess . 6. Can. 9. Beza in Rom. 3.20 . Pet. Mart. in 1. Cor. 1. f. 32. in 8. Witak . ad rat . 1. Cam. pag. 7. Perk. Catathes . tom . 1. Col. 487. The third daughter , Concupiscence is originall sinne . Luth. in confut . La tom . fol. 220. & tom . 5. in Galat. 1. fol. 227.228 . in cap. 2. fol. 231. ibid. de bonis operib . fol. 581. in natal . Christi fol. 374. Calu. lib. 2. cap. 1. §. 8. & lib. 4. cap. 15. §. 10. & in Antidot . Concil . Trid. ad sess . 5. & lib. 3. Instit. cap. 11. §. 3. & lib. 3. Instit. cap. 1. §. 8. & cap. 14. §. 9. lib. 2. Instit. cap. 11. §. 8 & 9. & lib. 3. cap. 11. §. 2. & 3. Vrb. Regius in locis tom . 1. fol. 358. Witak . de peccat . orig . lib. 2. cap. 3. pag. 656. The fourth daughter , Predestination to dānation . Calu. lib. 1. Inst . cap. 18. §. 1. & lib. 3 cap 23. §. 6. & 9. & lib. 2 cap 4 §. 2. & lib. 1. cap. 18. §. 2. & . 4. & lib. 3. cap 23. §. 9. & lib. 1. Inst . c. 17. §. 5. & 18. §. 1.2 . & lib. 3. cap. 4. §. 2. & lib 1 Inst. cap. 18. §. 3. &c. 2. §. 10. & lib. 1. Inst . cap. 14. §. 2. & lib. 2. cap 4. §. 5. & lib. 3. cap 23. §. 14. &c. 24. §. 13.14 . & lib. 3. cap 24. §. 12. Vide plu●a infra sect . 5 Subdus . 4. Absurdities which follow vpon contempt of Church-authority . 1. The want of a true Church , fayth , and saluation . 2. The misbeliefe of al Prelates , Princes , & people . 3. The falshood of all prophesyes and predictions . Castalio in his preface of the great Latin Bible dedicated to King Edward 6. 2. Tim. 3.15 ▪ Dauid Georg in hist. Daui . Georg. printed at Antwerp : an . 1568 by the Diuines of Basil . & in a Protestant booke intituled , Apocalipsis infigniū aliquorum Haeresiarcharum . printed Lug duni Batauorum ann . 1608. See the Protestants Apology Tract . 2. cap. 3. p. 307. 4. The preheminence of Iewes & Gentils aboue Christians . (a) Aggeus 2.10 . (b) Psal . 2.8 (c) Isa 49.23 (d) Psalm . 71 10.15 . (e) Isa . 42.4.60.9 . Absurdities which follow vpon only fayth . 1. That euery Protestāt is more certaine of his saluation , then Christ was of his owne . 2. That their fayth is not groūded vpon any scripture or authority . 3. That all Protestants are as iust as Christ . (a) Luth. tom ▪ 5. enar . in ▪ 1. Pet. 1. (b) Zuing. to . 1. in art . disp . Tigur . fol. 628. (c) See Kellisons examen part . 2. exam 13. cap. 8. Cal. Turcis . l. 3. cap. 12. Apoc. 22.11 . Luther . serm . de natiu . virginis , & comment . in 1. Pet. 2. (a) ●ucer in Matth. 3. (b) Math. 11.11 . (c) Zuin. to . 1. in art . dis . Tygur . f. 628. 4. That all the world shal be saued , proued by diuers Protestant positions . (d) Calu. Inst 6.24 . Infās à matris vtero in foedore continetur &c. Filiorum haud dubié loco habet eorum filios , quorum semini in patrē se for● pollicitus est &c. Calu. in Antidot . Concilij Trid. sess . 6.9.5 . Verùm infantes à regno Dei arcere libuit , qui ante erepti sunt ex hac vita , quam offerri ad Baptismum potuerint . Quasi vero de nihilo dictum sit eos nasci sanctos qui ex fidelibus nascuntur . Imò quo iure ad Baptismum eos admittimus , nisi quod promissionis sunt haeredes ? Nisi enim ante ad eos pertineret vitae promissio , Baptismum profanaret quisquis illis daret . Quod si Deus in regnum suum eos adoptauit , quanta iniuria fit promissioni , quasi per se ad eorum salutem non sufficiat ? Inclusa est infantium salus in promissione , quâ Deus Fidelibus testatur se fore illis , & semini eorum in Deum . Hac ratione sibi nasci pronunciab at , qui ex Abraham ducebant originem . Huius promissionis beneficio recipiu●tur ad Baptismum , quia censentur Ecclesiae membra . Non à Baptismo igitur initium habet corum salus , sed quae iam in verbo fundata erat Baptismo obsignatur . Calu. ep . 147. & 149. The same proued out of their doctrine , by speciall and only fayth . Remission of their sins & saluation an article of Protestants Fayth . (a) Calu. cathec . c. de fide . (b) Ibid. in ● Matt. 21.21 (c) Beza in confess . cap. 7. sect . 8. p. 60. (d) Idem . in Tim. 4.15 . (e) Idem in confess . cap. 4 sect . 18. p. 15 ▪ (f) Luth. postil . in Domi. 3. Aduent . f. 31. (g) Idem in Psal . 14. tom 3. fol. 247. (h) Bucer in Matth. 16. (i) Confess . August . 1531 art . 4. Saxon. cap. 16. Luth. disput . tom . 1. f. 53. Cal. in Rom. 10.10 . confes . fidei . Lobecius . Par. lib. 3. de Iustif. cap. 4. pag. 643. VVhita . ad r●t . 8. Camp. pag. 36. l. 8. contra Dur. sect . 47. conc . vltim . Per. de Bapt. tom 1. col . 810. Reinol . thes . 2. p. 71. Iew. defenc . Apol. part . 2. cap. 6. sect . 3. p. 149. Par. vbi supra . Luth. tom . 5. enar . in 1. Pet. 1. Zuing. tom . 1. in art . disput . Tygur . f. 628. See Kellison exam . part . 2. exam . 13. c. 8. Calu. Turcis . l. 3. c. 12. See aboue chap. 7. sect . 3. As well the reprobat as the elect obliged to belieue all articles of Fayth . Particuler saluation an obiect of Protestants fayth reuealed . As the Resurrection so the particular saluation of euery one an article of fayth . Zuing. tom . 2. in Exposit . fid . Christ . f. 159. b. circa medium . VVhi. his also defended by Gualt ▪ in Apolog pro Zuing & operib . eius , praefix . tom . operum Zuing. f. 27. a. b. & 28.29 . a. b. Vide Simleru● in vita Bulling . & see Bullengers allowāce of Zuinglius his forsaid Treatise . in Zuing tom . 2 f. 5●0 b. in it . Fox Martyr . pag. 495. That a man is iustifyed by a false Fayth . That a man is iustified by a contradictory fayth . That a man is iustified by a rash Fayth . That a man is iustified by a presūptuous faith . ●ob . 4.10.11 Psal . 17.25 . Rom. 5.19 . 2. Tim. 4.8 . 1. Cor. 3.8.9 . (a) Phil. 2.12 . (b) Eccl. 5.5 . (c) Eccl. 9. ● . That a mā , is iustifyed by a fayth , destroyes hope and Charity . That a man is iustifyed by a faith , which is iniurious to Christ . Which doth derogate from the generality of Christes redemption ▪ (a) 1. Tim. 2 6. (b) 1. Ioan. 2.2 . (c) 1. Tim. 2.4 . (d) Iohn . 1.29 . (e) Ioan. 3.16 . Calu. 3. iust . 22. & in Colo● . 1. in 1 Ioan. 2. Beza colloq . Mont. Pesul . f. 211.214 . &c. Sanch. misc . l 2. pag. 180 Which faith derogates from the perfection of Christs redemptiō . Calu. harm . in 26. Mat. 37.46 . & in 27.2 . Instit. 16. Luth. in Psal 22. tom 3. Witten . ann . 1585. (a) Rom. 3.24.25 . Rom 1.9 . (b) 1. Pet. 1.10 . Act. 5.9 . (c) Apoc. 15.22.14 . (d) Col. 1.10 (e) Act. 20.28 . (f) 1. Cor. 11 25. Luc. 22.20 . Mat. 26.28 . Ma●c . 14.24 . (g) Calu. 2. Instit 16.20 . (h) ●alu . 2. Instit. 17.1 . (a) Rom 6.17 . & 11. (b) 1. Tim. 2 (c) Rom. 7.23 (d) Gal. 3.10 (e) Isa . 28.15 . Calu. Instit. 14.4 . & 9. Luth. confut . Lat●m . Calu. 2. Insti . 7.5 . & 6. Luth. tom . 5. serm . de Matrimon●o . Which makes Christ no good Phisitian of soules . Which makes Christ an vniust ●aw-giuer Isa . 33.22 . Ioan. 13.34 . Which makes Christ an vniust Iudge . Ioan. 3 . 1● ▪ VVhich makes Christ no Priest . Psal . 109.4 . Heb. 5.6 . Gen. 14.18 ▪ Heb. 7.3 . Heb. 5.11 . Gen. 14.18 . By a fayth which makes Christ ignorant . 3. Reg. 4.30 . (a) Luth. c●nc● de natal . Christ. fol. 67 Zuing. in cap. 2 . ●uce . Beza in Heb. 5.7 . & in colloq mont . pag. 177. Bucer . in cap. 2● . Lucae . Danaeus cont . 2. pag. 143 . ●o●st . in anti . Bellarm. pag. 36. VVhitak . ad ●ation . 8. Camp. p. 35. Serranus cōt . Hayū . part . 3. pag. 284.285.289.290 . Cal. harm . in Mat. 9.2 . Matt. 21.18 . Matt. 24.36 . Matt. 26. Luc. 2.40 . Paraeus l. 5. de amissi . gratiae &c. cap. 14. pag. 836. & in Coll. The●l , 9. disp . 6. Sinnefull . Damned . In the pains of hell . Smitheus collat . doctrin . de Christo. cap. 2 art . 11.12 . ●3 . & 22. Smith coll●● . doctrin . lib. 1. cap. 16. art . 10. pag. 4 47. Absurdities which follow vpon Concupiscence being originall sinne . 1. That the whole Churche of the Protestants , is a congregation of great sinners . Smit . collat . l. 1. cap. 13. art . 9. p. 246. art . 9. pag. 446. cap. 18. art . 1. p. 474.476 . 2. That euery Protestant may as well cōmit great sinnes as do good workes , in respect of auoiding damnation . 3. That the grounds of Protestant Religiō admit great sinners to be perfect Protestants . 4. That in vaine & to no end , are 1. all pennāce , mortification , and austeri●y of life . 2. All lawes & Precepts of God , or man. (a) Sap. 6.4 . (b) Prou. 8.15 . (c) Rom. 13.1 . (c) Rom. 13.5 . (d) 1. Pet. 2.13.14 . (e) Tit. 3.2 . (f) Ephes . 6.5 . Col. 3.22 . (g) 1. Tim. 6.1 . (h) Matt. 22.21 . 3. All consultations , exhortatiōs & threats . 4. All cases and scruple of conscien● . The differēce between a iust Catholike , and a iust Protestant . The fourth daughter or progeny of the priuate spirit , which is predestination to sinne , and damnatiō . Absur●●ies which follow vpon it in respect of man. 1. Of Politicians and Atheists . Aug. epist. 48 2. Of desperate men . Aug. de bono perseuerant . cap. 15. Caesar . li. 1. c. 27. Aug. lib. 2 de animabus c. 11. Aug. de vera Relig. c. 14. Scotus 1. demonst . 39. Absurdities which follow vpon this doctrine of Predestination . 1. That it makes God the authour of sinne . Aug. haeres . 46. Epiph. hom . 66. Euseb . lib. 5. cap. 19. Becanus opus . theol . com . 1 . ●ract . de pr●destin . pag 2. de authore pec cati pag 99. de Apho●ism Caluinist ●rū pag. 249. & ● de diff●rentia inter Caluinistas , P●lagianos & Caholi●os . Smith . collat . c. 1. de Deo. 2. That it makes God a sinner . Rom. 3.8 . 3. That it makes God alone , the only sinner . Calu. 3. Inst . 14.17 . Calu. 3. Inst . 23.8 . Zuing. ser● . de prouid . Aug. de vera Relig. c. 14. 4. That it makes God a great lyer and dissembler . (a) Psalm . 5.5 . (b) Psalm . 44 8. (c) Zach. 8.17 . (d) Sap. 14.9 . (e) 3. Reg. 11 6. (f) 2. Reg. 11 27. (g) Caluin . de pr●destin . pag. 727. (h) 1. Instit. 191. in Genes . 3.1 . (i) Depraedest pag. 726. (k) Beza respons . ad Acta colleq . Mon●is● . p●g . 51. (l) Depraedest . cont . 〈◊〉 . vol. 1. Theol pag. 3.7.6 (m) Mart. in Sam. 1.4 fol. 32. (n) ●erk . in Cred. pag. 7.33 . of predestination p. 1.2.7 . (o) Bucan . Instit . theol . loco 14. pag. 145. (p) Isa 53 9. (q) Sap 3.5 . (r) 1. Prou. 14.22 . (s) 1. Iohn . 3 8. (t) Eccl. 15.21 . (u) Ierem. 32.35 . (x) Iac. 1.13 (y) 1. Cor. 10.13 . (z) Calu. 1. Instit . 17.11 . & 18.1 . in Rom 9.18 . de praedest . 7.2.7.7.3.9.7.4.6 . (a) 1. Instit. 14.17 . (b) 3. Instit . 23.1 . (c) De Praedest . p. 7.2.6 . (d) pag. 7.2.8 (e) Luth. de seruo arbitrio fol. 459. & fol. 433. (f) Melanct. in Rom. 8. de praedest . (g) Beza de praedest . contra Castal . pag. 3.9.9 . in Rom. 9.18 . (h) Sanct. de excec . quaest . 1. pag. 204. (i) De praedest●nat . Sanct. cap. 5. pag. 3.2.6 . (k) De exce●at . quaest . 5. pag. 211. (l) ●●b . 5. de nati● . Dei c. 2. pag. 5.6.8 . (m) de exce●at . quaest . 4. pag. 208. (n) In Iud. cap 3. fol. 52. (o) In Rom. 1. fol. 34.37 . & in Rom. 9. pag. 6.3 . (p) Ezech. 33 11. (q) 2. Pet. 3.9 . (r) Matt. 18.14 . (s) 1. Tim. 2 4. (t) Exod. 20.3 . (u) Ezech. 18 30. (x) Prou. 1.24 . (z) Math. 23 37. (a) Mat. 11.28 . (b) Calu. 3. Instit . 3.21.3 . Inst . 23.2 . (c) Calu. Instit . 24.12 . (d) 3. Instit. 24.17 . (d) Beza colloq . Montisb . pag. 418. (e) Piscator apud Vorstiū parasceue ad collat . pag. 8. (f) Beza 2. part . respons . ad act . Mont. pag. 226. (g) De praedest . contra Castal . pag. 3●6 . (h) Apud Schusselb . Theol. Cal. art . 8. p 71. (i) Ad Cal. Andr. vol. 3. theol . pag. 125. (k) Colloq . Montisb . pag. (l) Zanct. suppl . ad Senat. Argentin . col . 57. De praedest . c. 4. col . 317. & 295. (m) Perk. of predest . col . 139. Smith . Coll. lib. 1. cap. 6. art . 1. ad art . 24. 4 That it makes God a most cruell tyrant . More seuere in his lawes then Draco Agellio lib. 2. cap. 18. More cruell then any Tyrant . (a) Math. 2.16.14.9 . Act. 12.1.7 . Iud. 1.7 . Iud. 9.5 . Es●her 3.6 . Fulg●s . lib. 10 cap. 11. & Theatrum vitae humanae . Suet. Ner. Suet. Cal. Suet. Tiber. Marfil . Ficinus in epist. lib. 2. Agath . lib. 4. Seneca lib de clement . ad N●ronem . (a) Psal . 144 (b) ●uc 1.50 (c) S●p 15.1 (d) Eccles . 16 30. 5. That it makes God a Diuell . Because it makes God a tempter vnto sinne . (a) Matth. 4.3 . (b) 1. Cor. 7.5 . (c) Act. 5.3 . 7. It makes him the sower of the tares of sin . Math. 13.25 Calu. 1. Inst. 18 1. 1. Inst 14.2 . 4. Inst . 14.2 . 3. It makes God the authour of sin . 1. Ioan. 3.8 . Ioan. 8.44 . Calu. 3. Inst. 23.4 . & 7. Luth. de seruo arbitrio . Calu. serm . de prouid . c. 6 Zuing. in ep . This doctrine condemned by Protestants . Castal . de pradestinat . Vermilius in lib. 3. Reg. cap. 6. Fcuardentius lib. 2. de Theomachia Calumistica cap. 12. Tilmannus Heshusius lib. aliquot errorū Caluini . Grauerus absurda absurdorum . Obseruations vpō the former Protestant doctrine . Psalm . 13.1 . Calu. 3. Inst. 24.13 . The difference of the Protestant God from the Catholicke God. In ordaining sinne . In compelling to sin . In necessitating to sin . In being authour of sin . In predistination to damnation . In ordaining the end of sinne In denying meanes to be saued . In not remitting of sinne . In being sinnefull . Protestant positions which oppose Fayth , Hope , and Charity . (a) Luth. de libertate tom . 2. fol. 4. & in Gal. 2. tom . 5 fol. 305. Calu. in Gal. 2.16 . & in Act. 13.39 . Beza in Rom 3.20 . VVhit . ad rat . 1. Camp. pag. 7. Perkins in Catechis . tom . 1. Col 487. (b) Confess . August . edita VVittemb . ann . 1531. art . 4. Calu. 3. Inst. 11.19 . & 3. Inst. 14.16 . & 17. Et in Antid . Concil . Trid. sess . 6. ad cap. 10.13.14 . ad Canon . 14.15 . & 16. & 4. Inst . 2.16 . VVhita . ad rat . 8. Camp. pag. 3. (c) Calu. de praedest . pag. 695. & 7.3 . & in Antid . Concil . sess . 6. Canon . 17. pag. 291. Zanct. de perfect . Sanctorum cap 2. tom . 7. col . 113. & collat . 128. VVhitak . contro . 2. quaest . 1. cap. 8. pag. 434. Perkins de dissertion . tom . 1. c●l . 1026. (d) Calu. in Ioan. 20.28 . in Matth. 13.20 . in Luc. 17.13 . Instit. c. 2. §. 21. Beza in Ioan. 6.37 . in Colloq . Montisb . pag. 380. VVhitak . lib. 8. contra Duraeū sect . 48. & contro . 2. quaest . 5. cap. 7. pag. 515. Perkins in Galat. 1. tom . 2. col . 51. Zanct. de perseu . tom . 7. col . 128. & in sua confess . cap. 17. sect . 4. tom . 8. col . 522. (e) Luther . in Gal. 2. tom . 5. fol. 229. In cap. 5. fol. 420. & in cap. 8. Isa . tom . 4 fol. 53. Calu. in Ioan. 5.29 . & 3. Inst . cap. 4. §. 28. Beza . in epist . dedic . respons . ad Castal . vol. 1. Theol pag. 427. & 457. Zanct. de persen . Sanct. quaest . 1. cap. 2. tom . 7. col . 360 VVotton . in respons . ad art . papisticos pag. 92. Abbot in Diatrib . Thomsoni cap. 20. p· 189 (f) Of which see the first part and last Chapter . (g) Luth. tom . 1. in disp . fol. 390. & tom . 2 de ration . confitendi fol. 26. de captiuit Babil . fol. 80. In confut . Latomi fol. 220. & tom . 5. in Gal. 1. fol. 227. in cap. 2. fol. 231. Ibid. de bonis operibus fol. 58 Calu. de lib. arbit . lib. 1. pag. 141 & 3. Inst . cap. 17. §. 1. Beza in confess . cap. 4. sect 19. & lib quaest . & resp . p. 670. Tindal . apud Fox . in Act. p. 1139. VVitak . de pecc . orig . l. 2. c. 3. p. 656 (h) Confess . Gallic . art . 18. Calu. in Rom. 6.3 . in Gal. 3.6 . in confess . fidei pag. 108. Hūfred . ad ration . 2. Camp. pag. 142. Beza in confess . c. 4. §. 8. (i) Apolog. Angl. in Syntag. confess . pag. 123. Luth. de libert . Christian. tom . 2. fol. 4. & in 3. Gal tom . 5. fol. 329. Calu. in Antid . Concil . sess . 10. cap. 12. pag. 284. & lib. 1. de libero arbitrio pag. 148. Beza in Luc. 18.22 . & in Rom. 10.6 . Perkins de Baptis . tom . 1. col . 833. (k) Luth. in 1. Pet. cap. 2. tom . 5. fol. 464. & in act . VVormat . tom . 2. fol. 172. Calu. i● Iacob . 4.32 . Beza in confess . cap. 7. §. 9. VVhitak . contro . 4. quaest . 7. cap. 1. pag. 715. & lib. 8. contra Duraeum sect . 103. (l) Calu. 4. Inst. cap. 15. §. 3. Perkins in serie causarum c. 33. tom . 1. Col. 77. Beza lib quaest . & respon . vol. 3. pag. 344. VVhitak . lib. 8. contra Duraeum sect . 101. (m) Luth. de seruo arbitrio tomo 2. folio 460. Calu. 2. Inst. cap. 3. §. 10. & 2. Instit. cap. 3. §. 5. Zuing. de prudentia cap. 6. tom . 2. fol. (n) Zuing. in Elench . temo 1. folio 36. Calu. 3. Inst. cap. 23. §. 4. & 8. & de praedestinatione pag. 704. Beza in cap. 22. Luc. v. 22. & de praedest . cont . Castal . pag. 340. & 360. & in Colloq Montish p 431 Mart. in Rom 9. pag. 397. & in lo i● cō . class . 3. cap. 1. §. 34. Zanct. de praedest . cap. 3. tom . 7. col . 193. cap. 4. col 318 . ●iscat . in thes . lib. 2. loco 12 pag. 143. Perkins de praedest . tom . 1. col . 117. & in serie causarum cap. 52. & in cap. 1. Apocal. tom . 2. The beliefe of the articles of the Creed oppugned by historicall , generall , & speciall Fayth . (a) Kenn ▪ in locis tit . de argument . tomo 2. pag. 95. Hun de iustifi●at . p. 220. Zuing. in Iacob . 2. v. eit . tomo 4. Calu. 3. c. 2. §. 1.9.10 . Inst . 3. c. 2. § 28.29 . Beza in Iac. 2.14 . Mart. in locis class . 3. c. 3. §. 23. VVhitak . l. 1. contra Duraeū §. 13. Pareus lib. 4. de iustifi●●t . c. pag. ●157 . The Creed oppugned by the priuate spirit . Erasm . innuit , Lutherus irruit : Erasmus paritoua , Lutherus excludit pullos : Erasmus dubitat , Lutherus abnegat . Erasmus praefat . in Paraphras . Caluinus 2. Iust. 16 : 18 : Canis . praefation . corruptelis de verbo Dei. Beza . Apolog. 2. ad Zanct. pag. 385. Eras . lect . 5. in Symb. Calu. 4. Inst. 1.3 . Zuing. serm . de Symb. Luth. Smyb . Germanico . Beza praefat . in nouum testam . 1565. The particuler articles of the creed oppugned . Aug. sermone 115. Kellis . part . 2. reform . exam . 1. Of God the Father : Calu. in actis Serueti . Beza confess . Geneu . c. 1. Confess . Aug. impressa anno 1585. Stegius apud Genebrard . l. contra Steg . pag. 108. Luth. vt de e● Zuing. tomo 2. ad confess . Luth. f. 47● . Melanct. locis editis anno 1545. & vt obijcit ei Stancarus l. 4. de Trin. Sanctius de tribus Eleur . Cap. 9. §. 5 Luth. lib. de Concil part . 2. pag 276. Melanct locis editis anno 1545. f. 43. Formula concordiae anno 1580. Tigur . in ep . ad Polonos anno 1560. Iuel . against Harding . art . 17. Luth. vt Zuing. tom . 2 respons . ad cōfess . Luth. f. 47.4 . Luth. postil . maiori enarrat . Euangelij Trinitatis . Luth. en●hir . precum anno 1543. Athan. lib. de vnitate Dei. Cypr. lib. de vnitate Eccl. Fulg. respons . ad Arian . 1. Ioan. 5.7 . (a) Hunnius ▪ Caluin . Iudaizans . Antipareus , Antipareus alter (b) Dan. lib. contra Genebrardum . Calu. tractat . Theolog. (a) Beza col-Montisb . pag. 27. resp . ad acta Torgens . vol. 3 p. 60. l. 9. vol. 1. pag. 656. Martyr . cont . Gardin . resp . ad obiect . 11. col . 199.189 Dialog . col . 6. in 1. Cor. 11 pag. 159. Piscator the●ibus loco 2. p. 78. Sadelius de Sacrament . māduc . p. 300 Danaeus citatus ab And. colloq . Mōtis . pag. 178. ex suo dialogo . Tilenus suo Syntagmat . cap. 7. p. 75. Anton. de Dominis l. 5. de republ . cap. 6. num . 178. Reinolds Conference p. 68. (b) VVhitak . in his answere to ● . Reinolds Refutation p. 179. & 180. Calu. Catech. & 3. Inst . 23 2. & in Isa . 23. Ber. lib. 2. c●̄tra Hessus . Luc. 1.37 . The second article of the Creation oppugned ▪ Calu. lib. cont . Valent. Gentilem refut . 10. in Genes . 14.18 . Harmonia in Matth. 21.44 . & Matth. 26.64 . in Marc. 16.19 . Kellis . exemē part . 2. art . 2 Cred. The third article of the Diuinity of Christ oppugned . Luth lib. con . Ia● . Lat●m . Calu. ep . 2. ad Polonos anno 156● . & lib. cont . Valent. Gentilem . Bez. lib. contra Hessus . VVhita . resp . ad 3. ration . Camp. Caluinus 1. Inst. 3 in vlt Calu. 1. Inst. 31.9 & 24. The fourth article of Christs humanity oppugned . Brentius lib. de maiestate carnis Christ. Molin . 3. par Harmoniae . Bu●er . dial . de corpor . Christ. Calu. harm . in Matth. 2. Beza contra Smidelin . VVillet synop . controu . 1. q. 1. in appendi-Martyr . in Rom. 4. The fifth article of Christs passion oppugned . The sixth article of Christs descension and Resurrectiō oppugned . (a) Calu. Psycopanichia (b) Beza lib. cont . Brent . (c) Luth. ser . de Lazaro tom . 7. folio 267. (d) Bucer . ex Conrado lib. 1 art . 217. (e) Brent . apud Hospin . part . 2. folio 308. anno 1562. (f) Lohec . disp . 6. pag. 133. (g) Perk. in Apocal. 2. to . 2. col 90. (h) VVillet . in synopsi . (i) Calu. 2. Inst. 16.9 . Bulling . in 2. Act. VVittem-instruction . anno 1521. Zuing. & alij apud Busaeum thesibus ●oll . anno 1586. Beza in cap. 2 annotat . Buc. in Psal . 10. & in Matth. 17. Luth. tom . 3. VVittemb . an . 1553. sup . Ps . 16 p. 279. Gerla●h . cont . Busaeum apud . Cal. lib. 3. c. 13. Beza in Act. 2. Cal. 2. Inst. 16.8 . Beza in 1. Cor. 15. Brentius Kēnit . &c. supra in the fourth article . Andr. Iu. lib. Nullus & Nemo . The seauēth article of Christs Ascension oppugned . Calu. 2. Inst . 14.5 . & alibi supra . The eight article of Christs iudging the quicke and the dead , oppugned . The ninth article of the holy Ghost , and Catholike Church oppugned . Geneuenses Clypeo fidei f. 376. The tenth article of communiō of Saints , & forgiuenesse of sinnes , oppugned . The eleuēth article of the Resurrection oppugned . The twelft article of life euerlasting oppugned . Luth. tom . 2. VVitemb . an . 1562. p. 51. Luth. tom . 2. pag. 44. & 45. Luth. colloq . mensal . c. 49. Calu. in Ecclesiast . Calu. 3. Inst . 20.10.24 . Calu. 3. Inst. 25.6 . The petitions of the Pater noster & all prayer oppugned . The seauen petition of the Pater Noster . All prayer made needlesse and fruitlesse by this doctrine . All prayers are sinnes . See aboue in the first subdiuision . Luth postil . in Domin . 5. post Pasca fol. 263. Luth serm . de Ascense . Illyr . Claue Scripturae part . 2. Smith c●llat . cap. 1. art . 13 Rich●om . idolitria Hugonotica l. 2. c. 28. pag 177. & cap. 29 p. 182. The Pater noster oppugned by the Protestant doctrine . The first petition The second petition . The third Petition . The fourth petition . The fifth Petition . The sixth petition . The seauēth petition . The Protestāt doctrin ouerthroweth the ten Commandements . The prayse of lawes . Aristot. 3. Polit. Cicero . 2. de natura Deor. Plato lib. 4. de Legibus . The diuersity of lawes . The diuisiō of the ten commandments . (a) Luth. de saetul potesta . apud Collium tom . 1. lib. 7. art . 1. Delibertate Christiana tom . 2. fol. 3. De votis fol. 270. & in 1. Pet. 2. som. 2 fol 3. (b) Luth. lib. contra Regem Angliae tom . 2. fol. 346. De capt . Babyl . fol. 77. (c) Cal. 4. Inst 10.7 . & 8. In 4. Iac. 12. Confess . Basil art . 10. (d) Luth. in 1. Pet. 2. to . 5. fol. 464. de bonis operibus fol. 577. lib. de confess . ad Frācis . Act. VVormatien . tom . 2. fol. 172. Deseruo arbitr . tom . 2. fol. 431. Calu. in 4. Iacob . 21. Refut . Catelin . pag. 384. De necessitate reform . Eccles . pag. 58. Confess . Fidei pag. 209. Beza confess . cap. 7. sect . 9. Mart. locis class . 4. cap. 4. §. 5. Danaeus contro . 3. p. 509. contr . 5. pag. 1125. VVhitak . co●ci . 4. quaest . 7. c. 1. pag. 715. Perk. anatomy of conscience tom . 1. pag. 1215. hic case● of conscience cap 3. col . 1033. in Gal. 5. pag. 258. (e) Confess . August . cap. 6. Apolog. confess . cap. de impletione legis . Apolog. Anglic. in Syntagmat . confess . p. 123. Luth. de libert . Christiana tom . 2. fol. 4. Melanct. apud Luth. tom . 2. fol. 507. Calu. antidot . sess . 10.12 . pag. 284. lib. de libero arbit . pag. 248. In Lucam 10.26 . In Act. 15.10 . Beza in Luc. 18.22 . in Rom. 10.6 . Danaeus controu . de Baptism . cap. 15. pag. 389 974 VVhita . 1. lib. cont . Duraeum sect . 6. controu . 2. q. 6. c. 3. pag. 563. Perkins de Baptism . tomo 1 . ●●l . 833. Scharp . controu . 12. de iustific . p. 180. Adam Francis . margar . theol . loc . 5. p. 52. (g) Luth. ser . de Moyse . M●l . in locis apud Fabritium in harmonia confess . August . art . 20. p. 364. Zuing. in explanat . art . 16 Mart. in locis class . 2. c. 15. §. 22. Cal. 2. Inst. c. 7. §. 14. & in refut . Serueti pag. 652 Beza in 1. Ioan. 5.3 . & in c. 2. v 7. Tindal . apud Foxum in actis edit . 1610 pag. 1140. Bucan loco 29 Bulling . Decade . 5. ser . 8. (g) Luth. in cap. 2. ad Gal. tom . 5. fol. 311. Cal. in Matt. 19.17 . & 3. Inst . cap. 17. §. 7. & in Antid . Concil . sess . 6. pag. 218. in Act. 15.10 . & in Matth. 9.10 . Perk. in casibus conscient . cap. 7. col . 1335. Piscat . loco 17. pag. 283. Paraeus lib. 4. de iustificat . cap 7. pag. 1031. Mart. in 1. Cor. 10.12 . & in 1. Cor. 7.19 . (h) Confess . Aug. cap. debonis operibus . Confess . Scot. art . 15. Confess . Bohem. art . 7. Luth. in 3. Gal. tom . 5. fol. 343. & in 4. Gal. tom . 5. cit . fol. 393. Calu. in Rom. 43.8 . & 3. Instit. cap. 17. §. 3. & 13. & in Antid . Concil . sess . 6. cap. 12. pag. 283. In act . 15.10 . In Gal. 3.10.12 . Brent . Homil. 1. in Dom. 13. post Trinit . pag. 777. Par. lib. 4. de iustif . cap. 11. p. 1076. Danaeus contro . 5. pag. 973. (i) Calu. in Matth. 6.10 . Perk. in 3. Gal. col . 135. Absurdities which follow vpon the impossibility of keeping Gods commādments . Vpon the no● obliging of laws in conscience . Vpon good workes being sinnes . Vpon only fayth iustifying . Vpon want of Free-will Vpon absolute predestination to damnation . The Protestant doctrine doth nourish vices . Of slouth . (a) Eccl 7.33 Bern. de considerat . lib. 2. Chrisost . lib. de lapsu . Of Lust . (a) Sap. 4.1 . (b) Eccl. 26.20 . (c) Gal. 5.22 23. (d) Apoc. 14.4 . Cyp. lib. de 12. abusibus . Boetius de scholast . disciplina . Luth serm . de Matrimonio tom . 5. Of cruelty . Of Pride . (a) Prou. 8.13 . (b) Prou. 16.5 . Eccles . 10.14 15. Greg in Moralibus . August . in Epistolis . Luth. tom . 5. mar . in 1. Pet. 1. Zuing. tom . 1. actis disput . Tigu● apud K●l●if . ex●m . part . ● . exam 13 cap 8. & Calu. Turcis . lib. 3. cap. 1. The confessed bad life of the Protestant cōmon people in Germany . (a) Luth. postill . super Dom. 1. Aduentus . (b) Luther . Dom. 26 post Pentec●st . Luth. serm . c●nniual . Ger fol. 55. Luth. in Ioan 15. tom . 4. Germ. VVitt. fol. 220. siue tom . 7. Ger. Ien. fol. 162. b. §. 3. Domestica Postilla Norinberg . concion . 8. Dom. S. Trinit . fol. 79. §. 2. aut 87. §. 3. Tom. 2. Ger. Ien. in sentēt . de vtraque parte f. 103. & tom . 7. Germ. VVitt. fol. 362. b. §. 3. Melanct in c. 6. Matth. Eras . Sar. l. de disciplina Islebiae edit . apud Vrban . Ga●besch . f. 39. Smid in ● . sua de Planetis concione f. 1●1 . Smidel . in 4. Concion . de Planet . f. 141 Ioan. Brent . ad 3. Matth. Spang . in Enarrat . Beneficiorū Dei. Calu. Concio . 10. gallic . scripta in ep ▪ ad Eph. Musculus loc . com . cap. de Decal . expla . 3 praecepti p. 62. And. Mus . Dominic . 1. Aduentus . Idem lib. de abusu Sacrame● . cap. 14 Buc. his scrip . Anglican . pag 24. med . lib. 7. de regno Chri●ti cap. 4. Paul. Eber. praefat . Comment . Philip. in ep . ad Cor. Iacob . And ▪ concion . 4 ▪ in 21. c. 4. Lucae Sim. Vien serm . Dom. 13. Trinit . Erasm . epist . ad Vul●●●ium Neo●omi●um VVitt. anno 1529. Erasm . ●p ad fratres infer . Germ. B●ned . Morgenste●●● . de Eccle. p. 221. In England . M. Richard Geffrey in his sermon preached at Pauls Crosse 7. Oct. an . 1604. p. 31. Stubs in his motiues to good workes p●inted anno 1596. in his epistle dedicatory to the Maior of Lōdon . Pag 44.45 . The Puritans in their mild Defence alleadged in M. ●owels booke of thinges indifferent pag. 136. The confessed bad life of the Protestant ministery . Vide Apol. prot . pag 593 Musc . de locis commun . cap. de Ministris verbi . Dei. p. 180. VVigand . de bonis & malis Germaniae . Paul. Eber. praefat comment . Philip. ad Corinth . The confessed bad life of the first founders of Protestant Religion . Vlenberg vita Lutheri anno 1524. pag. 202. Of Luther . (a) Simon Vion vpon the Catalogue of Doctours englished , pag. 180. Luch in Gal. 1.14 . f. 3● . englished . (b) Luth. sup . fol. 35. (c) Luth. sup fol. 35. His Lust . (d) Luth. in Prou. 31.10 . (e) Luth. to . 5. VVitt. ser . de Ma●rim . f. 119.2 . vers . finem . & colloq . mensal . Germ. cap de Matrim . & tom . 2. VVittem . fol. 328. (f) Luth. to . 1. Epist. latinar . fol. 134 ad Philippum . (g) Luth. sup . fol. 345. (h) Zozem . hist. 6.3 . Code● lib. 1. de Episc . & Cleric . (i) Sleidan . comment . lib 5. an . 1525. fol. 65. English . Fulk . answer to P. Frarines declam p. 32. Luth. Colloq . latin . tom . 2. de Coniug . Melanct. epist ad Ioan. Camer . Erasmus epist. ad Manch . Vlman . Iustus Baron . lib. de praescriptionibus apud Kellis . ●●men . part . 2. cap. 10 pag. 715. (a) Luth. Colloq . Isleb . de creat . fol. 70. a. §. 5. (b) Ib. fol. 59 §. 5. (c) Tom 1. ep . lat . ●en . fol. 334. (d) Colloq . Isleb . de Coniug fol. 411. (e) Lab de vita coniuga . (f) Praefat. ●n Oecumenium Menij . tom . 4. Ger. fol. 463. (g) Postilla VVatem . in Euang. explicat . de diuite epulo●● & Lazaro f. 92. a. §. 2. (h) Tom. 2. Germ. Ien. ep . ad Baron . de Ster●●gh . fol. 459. (i) Tom. 4. Germ. Ien. de Bello ant● t●● cico f. 435. (k) In Postil . VVitt. f. 62. (l) Tom. 2. Ger. VVitt. de Orat. con . Turcas . fol. 475. (m) Tom. 4. Germ. VVitt. comment . in Matth. 5. fol. 37. (n) Tom. 1. Germ. VVitt. in Comment . Gal. 2. fol. 47. b. (o) Ibid. fol. 92. §. 3. (p) Tom. 1. Germ. VVit. fol. 361. & Tom. 1. lat . Ie● . fol. 47. b. (q) Com. in Psal . 5. to . 3. VVitt. f. 171. b. §. 5. & to . 3. Ger. VVitt. fol. 143. a. §. 5. (r) Tom. 1. Germ. VVitt. cōment . Gal. 3. fol. 147. vel 155. (s) Tom. Ger VVitt. cōmen . Exod. 20. f. 212. (t) Tom. 1. Germ. VVitt. comm . in Gal. 5. fol 173. (u) Comm. in Gal. 4. fol. 215. a. (w) Coment in Ioan. 17. tom . 4. Germ. f. 305. a. §. 5 (x) Epist . ad Philip. tom . 1. epist. Ien. edit f. 345. (y) De capt . Pabil tom . 2. lat VVitt. fol. 72. (z) Colloq . Isl●b . titulo de tentation . f. 291. b. §. 3. Sciop . Eccles . cap. 2.11 . &c Luth con . art . Louan . thes . 27. tom . 2. f. 505. ep . ad Ia● . presbit . & tom . 7. VVittenb . fol. 381.382 . Zuing. tom . 2 resp . ad confes Luth. f. 478. Tigur . confes . Germ. Tig. an . 1544. f. 3 (a) Answer to the defence of the censure attributed to Fulke p. 155. (b) Pag. 101 (c) Tigur . resp ad par● . confess . Luth. Hospin . histo . Sacram. part . 2. fol. 188. His Pride . (d) Oecolamp . confess . ad resp . Luth. Conrad Reg. l. cont . Ioan ▪ Hosium de Coena . Luth. locis Comm● class . 4. fol. 53. Luth. lib. ad Ducem Georgium , & in colloq lat●n . cap. de consolation . & ad cap. 1. ad Gal. tom . 5. VVitt. f. 290 b. Luth. tom . 7. in serm . de euersion . Hierusalem . fol. 271. a. Luth. loc . com class . 2. pag. 83. Calu. apud Schilleb lib. 1 theolog . Calu. fol. 126. Sleid. lib. 3. anno 1524. folio 2229. english . & l. 2. an . 1520. fol. 22. a. med Zuingl●us . Caluin . Conrad . Schusse● . theol . Calumist . lib. 2. fol. 72. a. cir●a mod . Beza . Hessus . lib. verae & sanae Confess . S●huss . supra lib. 1. fol. 93. a initio . Iacobus Andreas . Hospin . hist. sacram . part . 2. fol. 380. & 389. Seleucerus , Andreas , Musculus . Protest . Apology pag. 416.58.411.595 . Catholikes liues commended . Hollius . Chro edit . last , part . 1. pag. 100. line 31. Stow Annals pag. 64 printed an . 1592. Godw. in the life of Austine pag. 117. &c. Fox Acts Mō . pag. 117. an . 1576. Tind . Reuelation of Antichrist . Melā . Apolog. Confess . Aug. VVittomb . an . 1573 f. 221. Pant. Chron. pag. 95. Fox act . Mon. p. 70. next after an . 1216. Hackl . in his booke of nauigations 2. par 2. volum . p. 81. (a) Comment . rerum in Oriente gestarū fol. 2. (b) Pag. 36. (c) Fol 9. (d) Fol. 14. Abraham Hartwell his discouery of Congo printed ann . 1597. l. 2. cap. 3. Godw. Catalogue of Bish●ps . Stubs his motiues to good workes p. 44.45 . Syr Edward Sands in his Relation of the Religion vsed in the VVest partes of the world , sect . 48. paulo post initium . (a) Sect. 6. (b) Sect. 27. (c) Sect. 42. Stubbs his motiues to good workes printed 1596 pag. 43. Deut. 32.31 . The Protest . priuate spirits doctrin compared with the Catholike doctrine & shewed . 1. That theirs derogateth from the blessed Trinity . 2. Frō Gods mercy . 3. From Gods goodnesse . 4. Frō Gods Iustice . 5. Frō Gods omnipotency . That the Protestant doctrine doth derogate from Christ . 1. From his beatitude . 2. From his knowledge ▪ 3 From his supremacy , and power . 4. From his authority in making lawes . 4. From his sanctity . 6. From his redemption of mankind 7. From his merit and satisfactiō . 8. From his corporall passion . 9. From the certainty of his saluatiō . 10. From his descending to hell . 11. From his Resurrectiō and ascension . 12. From his adoration and intercession . (a) Marc. 10 47. Mat. 15.22 . & 20.31 (b) Mat. 2.11 (c) Mat. 28.9 . That the priuate spirits doctrin doth derogate from Saints and Angells . 1. Their Beatitude . (a) ●uth . Posti● . Domini● . 2. post . Trin fol. 286. & tom . 6. in 25. Gen f. 322. tom . 4. in 9. Eccl. c. 36. & 37. & in 2. Ioan. Calu. in 2. Pet. 2.4 . in Math. 22.23 . in Math. 27.43 . in Luc. 16.12 . 3. Inst. 25.6 . Bu●an . loc 39 p. 44● . Dan. contro . 7. p. 1265. 2. Their sanctity . (b) Calu. in Coloss . 1.10 . 3. I●st . 14.16 . & 17.9 . Conc. 16. in Iob. pag. 68. 3. Their power . (c) Beza in 1. Cor. 16. Vrsin . Catech. q. 99 p 944. Piscat . thes●l . 2. pag. 373. Perk. in 3. Gal. 3. 4. Their difference of glory . 5. Their esteeme with God. 6. Their knowledge of vs. 7. Their charity to vs. 8. Their honour by vs. Luth Postil . in festo S. Ioan . f. 378. & Ferijs eiusdē f. 9. die Epip . fol. 138. Calu. in 4. Ioan. 10. 9. Their custody and help of vs. That the priuate spirit doth tak from the word of God. 1. All the vnwritten word . 2 ▪ 21 parts of the written word . 3. The true translation . 4. The certainty of the sense . 5. The integrity of faith . 6. The authority to iudge of it . The priuate spirit derogates from the Church of God. 1. The authority . 2. The visibility . 3. The markes . 4. The continuance . 5. The beauty & magnificence . 6. The purity & incorruption of doctrine . The priuate spirit derogates from the Sacraments . 1 The number . 2 The effect of Baptism ▪ 3. The substance of the Eucharist . The priuate spirit doth derogate from Fayth . 1 The vnity of it . 2. The antiquity of it . 3. The grounds of it . 4. The meanes of it . 5. The purity of it . The priuate spirit derogates from man. 1. A freewil 2. All infused habits . 3. All inherent iustice . 4 Alinward purity . 5. All necessity or possibility of good works 6. All benefit of prayer 7. All care and labour for his saluation . The priuate spirit takes from sinne . 1. All difference of mortall and veniall . 2. All possibility to be auoided . 3 ▪ All imputation to punishmēt in some persons . The priuate spirit doth derogate from good workes in generall . 1. Their merit . The priuate spirit doth derogate from heauē 1. The reward of glory . 2. The difference of glory . They take away from hell . 1. The difference of place . (a) Calu. in Matth. 3.12 . Danaeus controu . 4 §. 11. pag. 210. Vorst . in Anti-bellar . pag. 269. Perk. vpon 2 Apoc. pag. 9. Lobec . disp . 6. pag. 133. 3. The suffering of the soules . 4. The local place of hell 5. All feare of sinne for hell . 2. The fire of hell . (b) Luth. ser . de diuit & paup . tom . 7. fol. 267. in cap. 9. Eccles . tom . 4. fol. 38. Postil ●● Domin . 4. post . Tri●it . fol. 286. Bucer . & Catheis . Hedalb . apud Schusselb . theol . Calu art . 27. fol. 145. Brent . apud Hosp . part . 2. anno 1562. fol. 308. & 230. & apud Bullinger . Lobec . disp . 6 p. 133. Perk. in c. 2. Apoc. col . 90. Tylenus ●yntag . c. 6. p. 69. Cal. Inst. 16.6 . (c) Luth. in 15. Gen. tom . 6. f. 321. serm . de diuit . & Lazar● tom . 7. f. 268. Postil . in Domin . 2. post . Trin f. 268. in 2. c. Ioan. f. 418. Calu. 4. Inst. 25.6 . in 2. Pet. 2.4 . Scult●t . 1. part . medul . in Tertul. cap. 42. pag. 305. Notes for div A12062-e89080 The true efffect of the working of the spirit of God declared . By the similitude of a naturall body . 1. Cor. 12.12 Rom. 12.4 ▪ The spirit giues to euery one his proper operation . Rom. 12.5 . Ephes . 4.7 . Rom. 12.3 . Rom. 12.6 . 1. Cor. 7.20 . Ephes . 4.11 . 1. Cor ▪ 12.21 ● . Cor. 12.21 The differēt manner of the spirits operations in catholiks from Protestants . In the persons who haue authority . In the articles of faith of which exposition is giuen . Vincent . Lyr. cap. 27. Cap. 28. In the points of faith expoūded . Vincent . Lyr. In the meanes or directions by which it is expounded . In the infallibility or certainty of their exposition . In the groūding ones fayth vpon this exposition . Protestants obiections , for their priuate spirits authority , answered (a) Rom. 12.6 . 1. Cor. 12.11.1.14.14 (b) 1. Cor. 14 24. Vers . 26. Vers . 29. Vers . 31. Guifts extraordinary and gratis giuen . Not giuen euery one to all persōs Rom. 12.3 . Rom. 12.6 . Ephes 4.11 . 1. Cor. 12.28 Giuen only with subord●nation to the spirit of the Church and Superiours . 1. Cor. 14.32 1. Cor. 14.23 Marc. 3.26 . 1. Cor. 12.11 ●uifts ex●raordinary giuen not generally to all . Guifts alike are not giuen to all , but are to be vsed by all as they are giuen . Rom. 12.3 . Ephes . 4.7 . By Episcopall & Diaconical function . Rom. 12.7.8 1. Cor. 7.20 . Hier. contra Vigilan . Non est cuiusuis hominis aureos nūmos & scripturas probare , vina gustar● . & Prophetas & Apostolos intelligere . 1. Cor. 12.28 . Ephes . 4.11 . S. Paul. 1. Cor. 14. is vnderstood , not of ordinary guifts to expound Scripture . Nor of the publike seruice of the Church . But of extraordinary guifts gratis giuen for languages ▪ &c. Vers . 40. Vers . 23. Iustin . Apol. 2. ad Anton. in fine . Tertul. Apologet . cap. 39. The manner of the Christiās assemblies in the first age of the Church (a) Vers . 22. (b) Vers . 3. (c) Vers . 24. & 25. (d) Vers . 29. (e) Vers . 33. (f) Isa . 54.13 (g) Ioan. 6 , 45. (i) 1. Thes . 4 (k) Hier. 31.33 . (l) Idem . v. 34. (m) Ioan. 7.17 . (n) Ioan. 10 , 27. (o) 1. Ioan. 2.27 . Grace to be saued , not to interpret scripture . Not all who haue Fayth , haue the guift of interpreting scripture . (a) Heb. 5.12 1. Cor. 3.2 . (b) 1. Cor. 3.1 . (c) 1. Cor. 14 38. (d) 1. Thes . 3.10 . (e) Epes . 1.13.14 . (f) 1. Cor. 3.16 . (g) 1. Cor. 14 37. (h) Hebr. 5.14 . (i) 1. Cor. 12 10. (k) 1. Cor. 14 (l) Act. 20.28 . (m) 1. Pet. 5.1 . (n) ● Tit. 2.15 . (o) Tit. 1.12 . (p) 1. Tim. 1.3 . (q) 2. Cor. 10. v. 5.6.8 . (a) 1. Ioan. ● . ● . (b) 1. Thes . 5 20. Pastours , not the cōmon people are to try spirits . How spirituall men iudge of spiritual things (a) Hebr. ●5 . 23 . & 14. Only spirituall men iudge of spiritual things and some of one , some of another spiritual affaire . (b) 1. Cor. 12. vers . 8.9.10.11 . (c) Vers . 27. (d) Vers . 21. & 22. Calu. 4. Inst. 17.25 . Nos vt in tota scriptura sanam huius loci ( Hoc est corpus meum ) intelligentiam non minori obedientia quàm cura consequi studeamus , neque praepostero feruore teme●è artipimus , & sine delectu quod temerè se mentibus ingerit , sed sedula meditatione adhibitâ sen sum amplectimur quam spiritus Dei suggerit , quo freti , despicimus quidquid terrenae sapientiae ex alto opponitur . Psal . 118.474 (a) 2. Tim. 3.15 . (b) 2. Pet. 1.19 . (c) Ephes . 2.20 . (d) Act. 17.11 . (e) Ioan. 5.39 . Meanes necessary , but not sufficiēt to expound scripture . Are by persons proper and fit to be applyed . Aug. epist . 3. Tanta est Christianarumpro funditas literarum , vt in eis quotidie pro ficerem , si eas solas ab ineunte pueritia vsque ad decrepitam senectu●em , maximo ocio , summo studio , meliori ingenio conarer addiscere , Non quod ad ea quae necessaria sunt saluti , tantâ in eis perueniatur difficultate , sed cum quisque ibi fidem tenuerit sine qua pie recteque non viuitur , tam multa tamque multiplicibus mysteriorum vmbraculis opaca , intelligenda proficientibus restant , tantaqueue non solùm in verbis quibus ista dicta sunt , sed etiam in rebus quae intelli gendae sunt latet altitudo sapientiae , vt annosissimis , acutissimis , flagrantissimis cupiditate discen di , hoc cont●ngat quod eadem scriptura dicit : Cùm consummauerit homo tunc incipīt . Epist. 119. cap. vlt. Plura se in scripturis nescire quàm scire . See Staples . princip . doctrinalibus controu . 6. l. 9 c. 9.10 . &c. How Dauid and Timothy studyed scripture . How S. Peter exhorts to interpret scripture . (a) 2. Pet. 1.20 . (b) Ephes . 2.20 . How our faith is built vpon the Prophets & Apostles . (a) Act. 17.11 . How they of Ber●ea & the Iews searched Scripture . (b) Eccl. 19.4 . Act. 17.11 . I● ▪ 5.39 .