the chemical history of a candle a course of lectures delivered before a juvenile audience at the royal institution by michael faraday, d.c.l., f.r.s. edited by william crookes, f.c.s. a new impression, with illustrations london chatto & windus preface from the primitive pine-torch to the paraffin candle, how wide an interval! between them how vast a contrast! the means adopted by man to illuminate his home at night, stamp at once his position in the scale of civilisation. the fluid bitumen of the far east, blazing in rude vessels of baked earth; the etruscan lamp, exquisite in form, yet ill adapted to its office; the whale, seal, or bear fat, filling the hut of the esquimaux or lap with odour rather than light; the huge wax candle on the glittering altar, the range of gas lamps in our streets,--all have their stories to tell. all, if they could speak (and, after their own manner, they can), might warm our hearts in telling, how they have ministered to man's comfort, love of home, toil, and devotion. surely, among the millions of fire-worshippers and fire-users who have passed away in earlier ages, _some_ have pondered over the mystery of fire; perhaps some clear minds have guessed shrewdly near the truth. think of the time man has lived in hopeless ignorance: think that only during a period which might be spanned by the life of one man, has the truth been known. atom by atom, link by link, has the reasoning chain been forged. some links, too quickly and too slightly made, have given way, and been replaced by better work; but now the great phenomena are known--the outline is correctly and firmly drawn--cunning artists are filling in the rest, and the child who masters these lectures knows more of fire than aristotle did. the candle itself is now made to light up the dark places of nature; the blowpipe and the prism are adding to our knowledge of the earth's crust; but the torch must come first. among the readers of this book some few may devote themselves to increasing the stores of knowledge: the lamp of science _must_ burn. "_alere flammam._" w. crookes. contents. lecture i. a candle: the flame--its sources--structure--mobility--brightness lecture ii. brightness of the flame--air necessary for combustion--production of water lecture iii. products: water from the combustion--nature of water--a compound--hydrogen lecture iv. hydrogen in the candle--burns into water--the other part of water--oxygen lecture v. oxygen present in the air--nature of the atmosphere--its properties--other products from the candle--carbonic acid--its properties lecture vi. carbon or charcoal--coal gas--respiration and its analogy to the burning op a candle--conclusion lecture on platinum. notes. the chemical history of a candle lecture i. a candle: the flame--its sources--structure--mobility--brightness. i purpose, in return for the honour you do us by coming to see what are our proceedings here, to bring before you, in the course of these lectures, the chemical history of a candle. i have taken this subject on a former occasion; and were it left to my own will, i should prefer to repeat it almost every year--so abundant is the interest that attaches itself to the subject, so wonderful are the varieties of outlet which it offers into the various departments of philosophy. there is not a law under which any part of this universe is governed which does not come into play, and is touched upon in these phenomena. there is no better, there is no more open door by which you can enter into the study of natural philosophy, than by considering the physical phenomena of a candle. i trust, therefore, i shall not disappoint you in choosing this for my subject rather than any newer topic, which could not be better, were it even so good. and before proceeding, let me say this also--that though our subject be so great, and our intention that of treating it honestly, seriously, and philosophically, yet i mean to pass away from all those who are seniors amongst us. i claim the privilege of speaking to juveniles as a juvenile myself. i have done so on former occasions--and, if you please, i shall do so again. and though i stand here with the knowledge of having the words i utter given to the world, yet that shall not deter me from speaking in the same familiar way to those whom i esteem nearest to me on this occasion. and now, my boys and girls, i must first tell you of what candles are made. some are great curiosities. i have here some bits of timber, branches of trees particularly famous for their burning. and here you see a piece of that very curious substance taken out of some of the bogs in ireland, called _candle-wood_,--a hard, strong, excellent wood, evidently fitted for good work as a resister of force, and yet withal burning so well that where it is found they make splinters of it, and torches, since it burns like a candle, and gives a very good light indeed. and in this wood we have one of the most beautiful illustrations of the general nature of a candle that i can possibly give. the fuel provided, the means of bringing that fuel to the place of chemical action, the regular and gradual supply of air to that place of action--heat and light--all produced by a little piece of wood of this kind, forming, in fact, a natural candle. but we must speak of candles as they are in commerce. here are a couple of candles commonly called dips. they are made of lengths of cotton cut off, hung up by a loop, dipped into melted tallow, taken out again and cooled, then re-dipped until there is an accumulation of tallow round the cotton. in order that you may have an idea of the various characters of these candles, you see these which i hold in my hand--they are very small, and very curious. they are, or were, the candles used by the miners in coal mines. in olden times the miner had to find his own candles; and it was supposed that a small candle would not so soon set fire to the fire-damp in the coal mines as a large one; and for that reason, as well as for economy's sake, he had candles made of this sort-- , , , or to the pound. they have been replaced since then by the steel-mill, and then by the davy-lamp, and other safety-lamps of various kinds. i have here a candle that was taken out of the _royal george_[ ], it is said, by colonel pasley. it has been sunk in the sea for many years, subject to the action of salt water. it shews you how well candles may be preserved; for though it is cracked about and broken a good deal, yet, when lighted, it goes on burning regularly, and the tallow resumes its natural condition as soon as it is fused. mr. field, of lambeth, has supplied me abundantly with beautiful illustrations of the candle and its materials. i shall therefore now refer to them. and, first, there is the suet--the fat of the ox--russian tallow, i believe, employed in the manufacture of these dips, which gay lussac, or some one who entrusted him with his knowledge, converted into that beautiful substance, stearin, which you see lying beside it. a candle, you know, is not now a greasy thing like an ordinary tallow candle, but a clean thing, and you may almost scrape off and pulverise the drops which fall from it without soiling anything. this is the process he adopted[ ]:--the fat or tallow is first boiled with quick-lime, and made into a soap, and then the soap is decomposed by sulphuric acid, which takes away the lime, and leaves the fat re-arranged as stearic acid, whilst a quantity of glycerin is produced at the same time. glycerin--absolutely a sugar, or a substance similar to sugar--comes out of the tallow in this chemical change. the oil is then pressed out of it; and you see here this series of pressed cakes, shewing how beautifully the impurities are carried out by the oily part as the pressure goes on increasing, and at last you have left that substance which is melted, and cast into candles as here represented. the candle i have in my hand is a stearin candle, made of stearin from tallow in the way i have told you. then here is a sperm candle, which comes from the purified oil of the spermaceti whale. here also are yellow bees-wax and refined bees-wax, from which candles are made. here, too, is that curious substance called paraffin, and some paraffin candles made of paraffin obtained from the bogs of ireland. i have here also a substance brought from japan, since we have forced an entrance into that out-of-the-way place--a sort of wax which a kind friend has sent me, and which forms a new material for the manufacture of candles. and how are these candles made? i have told you about dips, and i will shew you how moulds are made. let us imagine any of these candles to be made of materials which can be cast. "cast!" you say. "why, a candle is a thing that melts; and surely if you can melt it, you can cast it." not so. it is wonderful, in the progress of manufacture, and in the consideration of the means best fitted to produce the required result, how things turn up which one would not expect beforehand. candles cannot always be cast. a wax candle can never be cast. it is made by a particular process, which i can illustrate in a minute or two: but i must not spend much time on it. wax is a thing which, burning so well, and melting so easily in a candle, cannot be cast. however, let us take a material that can be cast. here is a frame, with a number of moulds fastened in it. the first thing to be done is to put a wick through them. here is one--a plaited wick, which does not require snuffing[ ]--supported by a little wire. it goes to the bottom, where it is pegged in--the little peg holding the cotton tight, and stopping the aperture, so that nothing fluid shall run out. at the upper part there is a little bar placed across, which stretches the cotton and holds it in the mould. the tallow is then melted, and the moulds are filled. after a certain time, when the moulds are cool, the excess of tallow is poured off at one corner, and then cleaned off altogether, and the ends of the wick cut away. the candles alone then remain in the mould, and you have only to upset them, as i am doing, when out they tumble, for the candles are made in the form of cones, being narrower at the top than at the bottom; so that what with their form and their own shrinking, they only need a little shaking, and out they fall. in the same way are made these candles of stearin and of paraffin. it is a curious thing to see how wax candles are made. a lot of cottons are hung upon frames, as you see here, and covered with metal tags at the ends to keep the wax from covering the cotton in those places. these are carried to a heater, where the wax is melted. as you see, the frames can turn round; and as they turn, a man takes a vessel of wax and pours it first down one, and then the next and the next, and so on. when he has gone once round, if it is sufficiently cool, he gives the first a second coat, and so on until they are all of the required thickness. when they have been thus clothed, or fed, or made up to that thickness, they are taken off, and placed elsewhere. i have here, by the kindness of mr. field, several specimens of these candles. here is one only half-finished. they are then taken down, and well rolled upon a fine stone slab, and the conical top is moulded by properly shaped tubes, and the bottoms cut off and trimmed. this is done so beautifully that they can make candles in this way weighing exactly four, or six, to the pound, or any number they please. we must not, however, take up more time about the mere manufacture, but go a little further into the matter. i have not yet referred you to luxuries in candles (for there is such a thing as luxury in candles). see how beautifully these are coloured: you see here mauve, magenta, and all the chemical colours recently introduced, applied to candles. you observe, also, different forms employed. here is a fluted pillar most beautifully shaped; and i have also here some candles sent me by mr. pearsall, which are ornamented with designs upon them, so that as they burn you have as it were a glowing sun above, and a bouquet of flowers beneath. all, however, that is fine and beautiful is not useful. these fluted candles, pretty as they are, are bad candles; they are bad because of their external shape. nevertheless, i shew you these specimens sent to me from kind friends on all sides, that you may see what is done, and what may be done in this or that direction; although, as i have said, when we come to these refinements, we are obliged to sacrifice a little in utility. now, as to the light of the candle. we will light one or two, and set them at work in the performance of their proper functions. you observe a candle is a very different thing from a lamp. with a lamp you take a little oil, fill your vessel, put in a little moss or some cotton prepared by artificial means, and then light the top of the wick. when the flame runs down the cotton to the oil, it gets extinguished, but it goes on burning in the part above. now, i have no doubt you will ask, how is it that the oil, which will not burn of itself, gets up to the top of the cotton, where it will burn? we shall presently examine that; but there is a much more wonderful thing about the burning of a candle than this. you have here a solid substance with no vessel to contain it; and how is it that this solid substance can get up to the place where the flame is? how is it that this solid gets there, it not being a fluid? or, when it is made a fluid, then how is it that it keeps together? this is a wonderful thing about a candle. we have here a good deal of wind, which will help us in some of our illustrations, but tease us in others; for the sake, therefore, of a little regularity, and to simplify the matter, i shall make a quiet flame--for who can study a subject when there are difficulties in the way not belonging to it? here is a clever invention of some costermonger or street stander in the market-place for the shading of their candles on saturday nights, when they are selling their greens, or potatoes, or fish. i have very often admired it. they put a lamp-glass round the candle, supported on a kind of gallery, which clasps it, and it can be slipped up and down as required. by the use of this lamp-glass, employed in the same way, you have a steady flame, which you can look at, and carefully examine, as i hope you will do, at home. you see, then, in the first instance, that a beautiful cup is formed. as the air comes to the candle it moves upwards by the force of the current which the heat of the candle produces, and it so cools all the sides of the wax, tallow, or fuel, as to keep the edge much cooler than the part within; the part within melts by the flame that runs down the wick as far as it can go before it is extinguished, but the part on the outside does not melt. if i made a current in one direction, my cup would be lop-sided, and the fluid would consequently run over,--for the same force of gravity which holds worlds together holds this fluid in a horizontal position, and if the cup be not horizontal, of course the fluid will run away in guttering. you see, therefore, that the cup is formed by this beautifully regular ascending current of air playing upon all sides, which keeps the exterior of the candle cool. no fuel would serve for a candle which has not the property of giving this cup, except such fuel as the irish bogwood, where the material itself is like a sponge, and holds its own fuel. you see now why you would have had such a bad result if you were to burn these beautiful candles that i have shewn you, which are irregular, intermittent in their shape, and cannot therefore have that nicely-formed edge to the cup which is the great beauty in a candle. i hope you will now see that the perfection of a process--that is, its utility--is the better point of beauty about it. it is not the best looking thing, but the best acting thing, which is the most advantageous to us. this good-looking candle is a bad burning one. there will be a guttering round about it because of the irregularity of the stream of air and the badness of the cup which is formed thereby. you may see some pretty examples (and i trust you will notice these instances) of the action of the ascending current when you have a little gutter run down the side of a candle, making it thicker there than it is elsewhere. as the candle goes on burning, that keeps its place and forms a little pillar sticking up by the side, because, as it rises higher above the rest of the wax or fuel, the air gets better round it, and it is more cooled and better able to resist the action of the heat at a little distance. now, the greatest mistakes and faults with regard to candles, as in many other things, often bring with them instruction which we should not receive if they had not occurred. we come here to be philosophers; and i hope you will always remember that whenever a result happens, especially if it be new, you should say, "what is the cause? why does it occur?" and you will in the course of time find out the reason. then, there is another point about these candles which will answer a question,--that is, as to the way in which this fluid gets out of the cup, up the wick, and into the place of combustion. you know that the flames on these burning wicks in candles made of beeswax, stearin, or spermaceti, do not run down to the wax or other matter, and melt it all away, but keep to their own right place. they are fenced off from the fluid below, and do not encroach on the cup at the sides. i cannot imagine a more beautiful example than the condition of adjustment under which a candle makes one part subserve to the other to the very end of its action. a combustible thing like that, burning away gradually, never being intruded upon by the flame, is a very beautiful sight; especially when you come to learn what a vigorous thing flame is--what power it has of destroying the wax itself when it gets hold of it, and of disturbing its proper form if it come only too near. but how does the flame get hold of the fuel? there is a beautiful point about that--_capillary attraction_[ ]. "capillary attraction!" you say,--"the attraction of hairs." well, never mind the name: it was given in old times, before we had a good understanding of what the real power was. it is by what is called capillary attraction that the fuel is conveyed to the part where combustion goes on, and is deposited there, not in a careless way, but very beautifully in the very midst of the centre of action which takes place around it. now, i am going to give you one or two instances of capillary attraction. it is that kind of action or attraction which makes two things that do not dissolve in each other still hold together. when you wash your hands, you wet them thoroughly; you take a little soap to make the adhesion better, and you find your hand remains wet. this is by that kind of attraction of which i am about to speak. and, what is more, if your hands are not soiled (as they almost always are by the usages of life), if you put your finger into a little warm water, the water will creep a little way up the finger, though you may not stop to examine it. i have here a substance which is rather porous--a column of salt--and i will pour into the plate at the bottom, not water, as it appears, but a saturated solution of salt which cannot absorb more; so that the action which you see will not be due to its dissolving anything. we may consider the plate to be the candle, and the salt the wick, and this solution the melted tallow. (i have coloured the fluid, that you may see the action better.) you observe that, now i pour in the fluid, it rises and gradually creeps up the salt higher and higher; and provided the column does not tumble over, it will go to the top. [illustration: fig. .] if this blue solution were combustible, and we were to place a wick at the top of the salt, it would burn as it entered into the wick. it is a most curious thing to see this kind of action taking place, and to observe how singular some of the circumstances are about it. when you wash your hands, you take a towel to wipe off the water; and it is by that kind of wetting, or that kind of attraction which makes the towel become wet with water, that the wick is made wet with the tallow. i have known some careless boys and girls (indeed, i have known it happen to careful people as well) who, having washed their hands and wiped them with a towel, have thrown the towel over the side of the basin, and before long it has drawn all the water out of the basin and conveyed it to the floor, because it happened to be thrown over the side in such a way as to serve the purpose of a syphon.[ ] that you may the better see the way in which the substances act one upon another, i have here a vessel made of wire gauze filled with water, and you may compare it in its action to the cotton in one respect, or to a piece of calico in the other. in fact, wicks are sometimes made of a kind of wire gauze. you will observe that this vessel is a porous thing; for if i pour a little water on to the top, it will run out at the bottom. you would be puzzled for a good while if i asked you what the state of this vessel is, what is inside it, and why it is there? the vessel is full of water, and yet you see the water goes in and runs out as if it were empty. in order to prove this to you, i have only to empty it. the reason is this,--the wire, being once wetted, remains wet; the meshes are so small that the fluid is attracted so strongly from the one side to the other, as to remain in the vessel although it is porous. in like manner the particles of melted tallow ascend the cotton and get to the top; other particles then follow by their mutual attraction for each other, and as they reach the flame they are gradually burned. here is another application of the same principle. you see this bit of cane. i have seen boys about the streets, who are very anxious to appear like men, take a piece of cane, and light it and smoke it, as an imitation of a cigar. they are enabled to do so by the permeability of the cane in one direction, and by its capillarity. if i place this piece of cane on a plate containing some camphin (which is very much like paraffin in its general character), exactly in the same manner as the blue fluid rose through the salt will this fluid rise through the piece of cane. there being no pores at the side, the fluid cannot go in that direction, but must pass through its length. already the fluid is at the top of the cane: now i can light it and make it serve as a candle. the fluid has risen by the capillary attraction of the piece of cane, just as it does through the cotton in the candle. now, the only reason why the candle does not burn all down the side of the wick is, that the melted tallow extinguishes the flame. you know that a candle, if turned upside down, so as to allow the fuel to run upon the wick, will be put out. the reason is, that the flame has not had time to make the fuel hot enough to burn, as it does above, where it is carried in small quantities into the wick, and has all the effect of the heat exercised upon it. there is another condition which you must learn as regards the candle, without which you would not be able fully to understand the philosophy of it, and that is the vaporous condition of the fuel. in order that you may understand that, let me shew you a very pretty, but very common-place experiment. if you blow a candle out cleverly, you will see the vapour rise from it. you have, i know, often smelt the vapour of a blown-out candle--and a very bad smell it is; but if you blow it out cleverly, you will be able to see pretty well the vapour into which this solid matter is transformed. i will blow out one of these candles in such a way as not to disturb the air around it, by the continuing action of my breath; and now, if i hold a lighted taper two or three inches from the wick, you will observe a train of fire going through the air till it reaches the candle. i am obliged to be quick and ready, because, if i allow the vapour time to cool, it becomes condensed into a liquid or solid, or the stream of combustible matter gets disturbed. now, as to the shape or form of the flame. it concerns us much to know about the condition which the matter of the candle finally assumes at the top of the wick--where you have such beauty and brightness as nothing but combustion or flame can produce. [illustration: fig. .] you have the glittering beauty of gold and silver, and the still higher lustre of jewels, like the ruby and diamond; but none of these rival the brilliancy and beauty of flame. what diamond can shine like flame? it owes its lustre at night-time to the very flame shining upon it. the flame shines in darkness, but the light which the diamond has is as nothing until the flame shine upon it, when it is brilliant again. the candle alone shines by itself, and for itself, or for those who have arranged the materials. now, let us look a little at the form of the flame as you see it under the glass shade. it is steady and equal; and its general form is that which is represented in the diagram, varying with atmospheric disturbances, and also varying according to the size of the candle. it is a bright oblong--brighter at the top than towards the bottom--with the wick in the middle, and besides the wick in the middle, certain darker parts towards the bottom, where the ignition is not so perfect as in the part above. [illustration: fig. .] i have a drawing here, sketched many years ago by hooke, when he made his investigations. it is the drawing of the flame of a lamp, but it will apply to the flame of a candle. the cup of the candle is the vessel or lamp, the melted spermaceti is the oil, and the wick is common to both. upon that he sets this little flame, and then he represents what is true--a certain quantity of matter rising about it which you do not see, and which, if you have not been here before, or are not familiar with the subject, you will not know of. he has here represented the parts of the surrounding atmosphere that are very essential to the flame, and that are always present with it. there is a current formed, which draws the flame out--for the flame which you see is really drawn out by the current, and drawn upward to a great height--just as hooke has here shewn you by that prolongation of the current in the diagram. you may see this by taking a lighted candle, and putting it in the sun so as to get its shadow thrown on a piece of paper. how remarkable it is that that thing which is light enough to produce shadows of other objects, can be made to throw its own shadow on a piece of white paper or card, so that you can actually see streaming round the flame something which is not part of the flame, but is ascending and drawing the flame upwards. now, i am going to imitate the sunlight, by applying the voltaic battery to the electric lamp. you now see our sun, and its great luminosity; and by placing a candle between it and the screen, we get the shadow of the flame. [illustration: fig. .] you observe the shadow of the candle and of the wick; then there is a darkish part, as represented in the diagram, and then a part which is more distinct. curiously enough, however, what we see in the shadow as the darkest part of the flame is, in reality, the brightest part; and here you see streaming upwards the ascending current of hot air, as shewn by hooke, which draws out the flame, supplies it with air, and cools the sides of the cup of melted fuel. i can give you here a little further illustration, for the purpose of shewing you how flame goes up or down; according to the current. i have here a flame--it is not a candle flame--but you can, no doubt, by this time, generalise enough to be able to compare one thing with another. what i am about to do is to change the ascending current that takes the flame upwards into a descending current. this i can easily do by the little apparatus you see before me. the flame, as i have said, is not a candle flame, but it is produced by alcohol, so that it shall not smoke too much. i will also colour the flame with another substance[ ], so that you may trace its course; for with the spirit alone you could hardly see well enough to have the opportunity of tracing its direction. by lighting this spirit-of-wine, we have then a flame produced; and you observe that when held in the air, it naturally goes upwards. [illustration: fig. ] you understand now easily enough why flames go up under ordinary circumstances--it is because of the draught of air by which the combustion is formed. but now, by blowing the flame down, you see i am enabled to make it go downwards into this little chimney--the direction of the current being changed. before we have concluded this course of lectures, we shall shew you a lamp in which the flame goes up and the smoke goes down, or the flame goes down and the smoke goes up. you see, then, that we have the power in this way of varying the flame in different directions. there are now some other points that i must bring before you. many of the flames you see here vary very much in their shape by the currents of air blowing around them in different directions; but we can, if we like, make flames so that they will look like fixtures, and we can photograph them--indeed, we have to photograph them--so that they become fixed to us, if we wish to find out everything concerning them. that, however, is not the only thing i wish to mention. if i take a flame sufficiently large, it does not keep that homogeneous, that uniform condition of shape, but it breaks out with a power of life which is quite wonderful. i am about to use another kind of fuel, but one which is truly and fairly a representative of the wax or tallow of a candle. i have here a large ball of cotton, which will serve as a wick. and, now that i have immersed it in spirit and applied a light to it, in what way does it differ from an ordinary candle? why, it differs very much in one respect, that we have a vivacity and power about it, a beauty and a life entirely different from the light presented by a candle. you see those fine tongues of flame rising up. you have the same general disposition of the mass of the flame from below upwards; but, in addition to that, you have this remarkable breaking out into tongues which you do not perceive in the case of a candle. now, why is this? i must explain it to you, because when you understand that perfectly, you will be able to follow me better in what i have to say hereafter. i suppose some here will have made for themselves the experiment i am going to shew you. am i right in supposing that anybody here has played at snapdragon? i do not know a more beautiful illustration of the philosophy of flame, as to a certain part of its history, than the game of snapdragon. first, here is the dish; and let me say, that when you play snapdragon properly, you ought to have the dish well-warmed; you ought also to have warm plums and warm brandy, which, however, i have not got. when you have put the spirit into the dish, you have the cup and the fuel; and are not the raisins acting like the wicks? i now throw the plums into the dish, and light the spirit, and you see those beautiful tongues of flame that i refer to. you have the air creeping in over the edge of the dish forming these tongues. why? because, through the force of the current and the irregularity of the action of the flame, it cannot flow in one uniform stream. the air flows in so irregularly that you have what would otherwise be a single image, broken up into a variety of forms, and each of these little tongues has an independent existence of its own. indeed, i might say, you have here a multitude of independent candles. you must not imagine, because you see these tongues all at once, that the flame is of this particular shape. a flame of that shape is never so at any one time. never is a body of flame, like that which you just saw rising from the ball, of the shape it appears to you. it consists of a multitude of different shapes, succeeding each other so fast that the eye is only able to take cognisance of them all at once. in former times, i purposely analysed a flame of that general character, and the diagram shews you the different parts of which it is composed. they do not occur all at once: it is only because we see these shapes in such rapid succession, that they seem to us to exist all at one time. [illustration: fig. .] it is too bad that we have not got further than my game of snapdragon; but we must not, under any circumstances, keep you beyond your time. it will be a lesson to me in future to hold you more strictly to the philosophy of the thing, than to take up your time so much with these illustrations. lecture ii. a candle: brightness of the flame--air necessary for combustion--production of water. we were occupied the last time we met in considering the general character and arrangement as regards the fluid portion of a candle, and the way in which that fluid got into the place of combustion. you see, when we have a candle burning fairly in a regular, steady atmosphere, it will have a shape something like the one shewn in the diagram, and will look pretty uniform, although very curious in its character. and now, i have to ask your attention to the means by which we are enabled to ascertain what happens in any particular part of the flame--why it happens, what it does in happening, and where, after all, the whole candle goes to: because, as you know very well, a candle being brought before us and burned, disappears, if burned properly, without the least trace of dirt in the candlestick--and this is a very curious circumstance. in order, then, to examine this candle carefully, i have arranged certain apparatus, the use of which you will see as i go on. here is a candle: i am about to put the end of this glass tube into the middle of the flame--into that part which old hooke has represented in the diagram as being rather dark, and which you can see at any time, if you will look at a candle carefully, without blowing it about. we will examine this dark part first. [illustration: fig. .] now, i take this bent glass tube, and introduce one end into that part of the flame, and you see at once that something is coming from the flame, out at the other end of the tube; and if i put a flask there, and leave it for a little while, you will see that something from the middle part of the flame is gradually drawn out, and goes through the tube and into that flask, and there behaves very differently from what it does in the open air. it not only escapes from the end of the tube, but falls down to the bottom of the flask like a heavy substance, as indeed it is. we find that this is the wax of the candle made into a vaporous fluid--not a gas. (you must learn the difference between a gas and a vapour: a gas remains permanent, a vapour is something that will condense.) if you blow out a candle, you perceive a very nasty smell, resulting from the condensation of this vapour. that is very different from what you have outside the flame; and, in order to make that more clear to you, i am about to produce and set fire to a larger portion of this vapour--for what we have in the small way in a candle, to understand thoroughly, we must, as philosophers, produce in a larger way, if needful, that we may examine the different parts. and now mr. anderson will give me a source of heat, and i am about to shew you what that vapour is. here is some wax in a glass flask, and i am going to make it hot, as the inside of that candle-flame is hot, and the matter about the wick is hot. [the lecturer placed some wax in a glass flask, and heated it over a lamp.] now, i dare say that is hot enough for me. you see that the wax i put in it has become fluid, and there is a little smoke coming from it. we shall very soon have the vapour rising up. i will make it still hotter, and now we get more of it, so that i can actually pour the vapour out of the flask into that basin, and set it on fire there. this, then, is exactly the same kind of vapour as we have in the middle of the candle; and that you may be sure this is the case, let us try whether we have not got here, in this flask, a real combustible vapour out of the middle of the candle. [taking the flask into which the tube from the candle proceeded, and introducing a lighted taper.] see how it burns. now, this is the vapour from the middle of the candle, produced by its own heat; and that is one of the first things you have to consider with respect to the progress of the wax in the course of its combustion, and as regards the changes it undergoes. i will arrange another tube carefully in the flame, and i should not wonder if we were able, by a little care, to get that vapour to pass through the tube to the other extremity, where we will light it, and obtain absolutely the flame of the candle at a place distant from it. now, look at that. is not that a very pretty experiment? talk about laying on gas--why, we can actually lay on a candle! and you see from this that there are clearly two different kinds of action--one the _production_ of the vapour, and the other the _combustion_ of it--both of which take place in particular parts of the candle. [illustration: fig. ] i shall get no vapour from that part which is already burnt. if i raise the tube (fig. ) to the upper part of the flame, so soon as the vapour has been swept out, what comes away will be no longer combustible: it is already burned. how burned? why, burned thus:--in the middle of the flame, where the wick is, there is this combustible vapour; on the outside of the flame is the air which we shall find necessary for the burning of the candle; between the two, intense chemical action takes place, whereby the air and the fuel act upon each other, and at the very same time that we obtain light the vapour inside is destroyed. if you examine where the heat of a candle is, you will find it very curiously arranged. suppose i take this candle, and hold a piece of paper close upon the flame, where is the heat of that flame? do you not see that it is _not_ in the inside? it is in a ring, exactly in the place where i told you the chemical action was; and even in my irregular mode of making the experiment, if there is not too much disturbance, there will always be a ring. this is a good experiment for you to make at home. take a strip of paper, have the air in the room quiet, and put the piece of paper right across the middle of the flame (i must not talk while i make the experiment), and you will find that it is burnt in two places, and that it is not burnt, or very little so, in the middle; and when you have tried the experiment once or twice, so as to make it nicely, you will be very interested to see where the heat is, and to find that it is where the air and the fuel come together. this is most important for us as we proceed with our subject. air is absolutely necessary for combustion; and, what is more, i must have you understand that _fresh_ air is necessary, or else we should be imperfect in our reasoning and our experiments. here is a jar of air. i place it over a candle, and it burns very nicely in it at first, shewing that what i have said about it is true; but there will soon be a change. see how the flame is drawing upwards, presently fading, and at last going out. and going out, why? not because it wants air merely, for the jar is as full now as it was before; but it wants pure, fresh air. the jar is full of air, partly changed, partly not changed; but it does not contain sufficient of the fresh air which is necessary for the combustion of a candle. these are all points which we, as young chemists, have to gather up; and if we look a little more closely into this kind of action, we shall find certain steps of reasoning extremely interesting. for instance, here is the oil-lamp i shewed you--an excellent lamp for our experiments--the old argand lamp. i now make it like a candle [obstructing the passage of air into the centre of the flame]; there is the cotton; there is the oil rising up it; and there is the conical flame. it burns poorly, because there is a partial restraint of air. i have allowed no air to get to it, save round the outside of the flame, and it does not burn well. i cannot admit more air from the outside, because the wick is large; but if, as argand did so cleverly, i open a passage to the middle of the flame, and so let air come in there, you will see how much more beautifully it burns. if i shut the air off, look how it smokes; and why? we have now some very interesting points to study. we have the case of the combustion of a candle; we have the case of a candle being put out by the want of air; and we have now the case of imperfect combustion; and this is to us so interesting, that i want you to understand it as thoroughly as you do the case of a candle burning in its best possible manner. i will now make a great flame, because we need the largest possible illustrations. here is a larger wick [burning turpentine on a ball of cotton]. all these things are the same as candles, after all. if we have larger wicks, we must have a larger supply of air, or we shall have less perfect combustion. look now at this black substance going up into the atmosphere; there is a regular stream of it. i have provided means to carry off the imperfectly burned part, lest it should annoy you. look at the soots that fly off from the flame: see what an imperfect combustion it is, because it cannot get enough air. what, then, is happening? why, certain things which are necessary to the combustion of a candle are absent, and very bad results are accordingly produced; but we see what happens to a candle when it is burnt in a pure and proper state of air. at the time when i shewed you this charring by the ring of flame on the one side of the paper, i might have also shewn you, by turning to the other side, that the burning of a candle produces the same kind of soot--charcoal or carbon. but, before i shew that, let me explain to you--as it is quite necessary for our purpose--that, though i take a candle and give you, as the general result, its combustion in the form of a flame, we must see whether combustion is always in this condition, or whether there are other conditions of flame; and we shall soon discover that there are, and that they are most important to us. i think, perhaps, the best illustration of such a point to us, as juveniles, is to shew the result of strong contrast. here is a little gunpowder. you know that gunpowder burns with flame--we may fairly call it flame. it contains carbon and other materials, which altogether cause it to burn with a flame. and here is some pulverised iron, or iron filings. now, i purpose burning these two things together. i have a little mortar in which i will mix them. (before i go into these experiments, let me hope that none of you, by trying to repeat them, for fun's sake, will do any harm. these things may all be very properly used if you take care; but without that, much mischief will be done.) well, then, here is a little gunpowder, which i put at the bottom of that little wooden vessel, and mix the iron filings up with it, my object being to make the gunpowder set fire to the filings and burn them in the air, and thereby shew the difference between substances burning with flame and not with flame. here is the mixture; and when i set fire to it, you must watch the combustion, and you will see that it is of two kinds. you will see the gunpowder burning with a flame, and the filings thrown up. you will see them burning too, but without the production of flame. they will each burn separately. [the lecturer then ignited the mixture.] there is the gunpowder, which burns with a flame; and there are the filings--they burn with a different kind of combustion. you see, then, these two great distinctions; and upon these differences depend all the utility and all the beauty of flame which we use for the purpose of giving out light. when we use oil, or gas, or candle, for the purpose of illumination, their fitness all depends upon these different kinds of combustion. there are such curious conditions of flame, that it requires some cleverness and nicety of discrimination to distinguish the kinds of combustion one from another. for instance, here is a powder which is very combustible, consisting, as you see, of separate little particles. it is called _lycopodium_[ ], and each of these particles can produce a vapour, and produce its own flame; but, to see them burning, you would imagine it was all one flame. i will now set fire to a quantity, and you will see the effect. we saw a cloud of flame, apparently in one body; but that rushing noise [referring to the sound produced by the burning] was a proof that the combustion was not a continuous or regular one. this is the lightning of the pantomimes, and a very good imitation. [the experiment was twice repeated by blowing lycopodium from a glass tube through a spirit-flame.] this is not an example of combustion like that of the filings i have been speaking of, to which we must now return. suppose i take a candle, and examine that part of it which appears brightest to our eyes. why, there i get these black particles, which already you have seen many times evolved from the flame, and which i am now about to evolve in a different way. i will take this candle and clear away the gutterage, which occurs by reason of the currents of air; and if i now arrange a glass tube so as just to dip into this luminous part, as in our first experiment, only higher, you see the result. in place of having the same white vapour that you had before, you will now have a black vapour. there it goes, as black as ink. it is certainly very different from the white vapour; and when we put a light to it, we shall find that it does not burn, but that it puts the light out. well, these particles, as i said before, are just the smoke of the candle; and this brings to mind that old employment which dean swift recommended to servants for their amusement, namely, writing on the ceiling of a room with a candle. but what is that black substance? why, it is the same carbon which exists in the candle. how comes it out of the candle? it evidently existed in the candle, or else we should not have had it here. and now i want you to follow me in this explanation. you would hardly think that all those substances which fly about london, in the form of soots and blacks, are the very beauty and life of the flame, and which are burned in it as those iron filings were burned here. here is a piece of wire gauze, which will not let the flame go through it; and i think you will see, almost immediately, that when i bring it low enough to touch that part of the flame which is otherwise so bright, that it quells and quenches it at once, and allows a volume of smoke to rise up. i want you now to follow me in this point,--that whenever a substance burns, as the iron filings burnt in the flame of gunpowder, without assuming the vaporous state (whether it becomes liquid or remains solid), it becomes exceedingly luminous. i have here taken three or four examples apart from the candle, on purpose to illustrate this point to you; because what i have to say is applicable to all substances, whether they burn or whether they do not burn,--that they are exceedingly bright if they retain their solid state, and that it is to this presence of solid particles in the candle-flame that it owes its brilliancy. here is a platinum-wire, a body which does not change by heat. if i heat it in this flame, see how exceedingly luminous it becomes. i will make the flame dim, for the purpose of giving a little light only, and yet you will see that the heat which it can give to that platinum-wire, though far less than the heat it has itself, is able to raise the platinum-wire to a far higher state of effulgence. this flame has carbon in it; but i will take one that has no carbon in it. there is a material, a kind of fuel--a vapour, or gas, whichever you like to call it--in that vessel, and it has no solid particles in it; so i take that because it is an example of flame itself burning without any solid matter whatever; and if i now put this solid substance in it, you see what an intense heat it has, and how brightly it causes the solid body to glow. this is the pipe through which we convey this particular gas, which we call hydrogen, and which you shall know all about next time we meet. and here is a substance called oxygen, by means of which this hydrogen can burn; and although we produce, by their mixture, far greater heat[ ] than you can obtain from the candle, yet there is very little light. if, however, i take a solid substance, and put that into it, we produce an intense light if i take a piece of lime, a substance which will not burn, and which will not vaporise by the heat (and because it does not vaporise, remains solid, and remains heated), you will soon observe what happens as to its glowing. i have here a most intense heat, produced by the burning of hydrogen in contact with the oxygen; but there is as yet very little light--not for want of heat, but for want of particles which can retain their solid state; but when i hold this piece of lime in the flame of the hydrogen as it burns in the oxygen, see how it glows! this is the glorious lime-light, which rivals the voltaic-light, and which is almost equal to sunlight. i have here a piece of carbon or charcoal, which will burn and give us light exactly in the same manner as if it were burnt as part of a candle. the heat that is in the flame of a candle decomposes the vapour of the wax, and sets free the carbon particles--they rise up heated and glowing as this now glows, and then enter into the air. but the particles when burnt never pass off from a candle in the form of carbon. they go off into the air as a perfectly invisible substance, about which we shall know hereafter. is it not beautiful to think that such a process is going on, and that such a dirty thing as charcoal can become so incandescent? you see it comes to this--that all bright flames contain these solid particles; all things that burn and produce solid particles, either during the time they are burning, as in the candle, or immediately after being burnt, as in the case of the gunpowder and iron-filings,--all these things give us this glorious and beautiful light. i will give you a few illustrations. here is a piece of phosphorus, which burns with a bright flame. very well; we may now conclude that phosphorus will produce, either at the moment that it is burning or afterwards, these solid particles. here is the phosphorus lighted, and i cover it over with this glass for the purpose of keeping in what is produced. what is all that smoke? that smoke consists of those very particles which are produced by the combustion of the phosphorus. here, again, are two substances. this is chlorate of potassa, and this other sulphuret of antimony. i shall mix these together a little, and then they may be burnt in many ways. i shall touch them with a drop of sulphuric acid, for the purpose of giving you an illustration of chemical action, and they will instantly burn[ ]. [the lecturer then ignited the mixture by means of sulphuric acid.] now, from the appearance of things, you can judge for yourselves whether they produce solid matter in burning. i have given you the train of reasoning which will enable you to say whether they do or do not; for what is this bright flame but the solid particles passing off? [illustration: fig. .] mr. anderson has in the furnace a very hot crucible,--i am about to throw into it some zinc filings, and they will burn with a flame like gunpowder. i make this experiment because you can make it well at home. now, i want you to see what will be the result of the combustion of this zinc. here it is burning--burning beautifully like a candle, i may say. but what is all that smoke, and what are those little clouds of wool which will come to you if you cannot come to them, and make themselves sensible to you in the form of the old philosophic wool, as it was called? we shall have left in that crucible, also, a quantity of this woolly matter. but i will take a piece of this same zinc and make an experiment a little more closely at home, as it were. you will have here the same thing happening. here is the piece of zinc, there [pointing to a jet of hydrogen] is the furnace, and we will set to work and try and burn the metal. it glows, you see: there is the combustion, and there is the white substance into which it burns. and so, if i take that flame of hydrogen as the representative of a candle, and shew you a substance like zinc burning in the flame, you will see that it was merely during the action of combustion that this substance glowed--while it was kept hot; and if i take a flame of hydrogen, and put this white substance from the zinc into it, look how beautifully it glows, and just because it is a solid substance. i will now take such a flame as i had a moment since, and set free from it the particles of carbon. here is some camphine, which will burn with a smoke; but if i send these particles of smoke through this pipe into the hydrogen flame, you will see they will burn and become luminous, because we heat them a second time. there they are. those are the particles of carbon re-ignited a second time. they are those particles which you can easily see by holding a piece of paper behind them, and which, whilst they are in the flame, are ignited by the heat produced, and, when so ignited, produce this brightness. when the particles are not separated, you get no brightness. the flame of coal-gas owes its brightness to the separation, during combustion, of these particles of carbon, which are equally in that as in a candle. i can very quickly alter that arrangement. here, for instance, is a bright flame of gas. supposing i add so much air to the flame as to cause it all to burn before those particles are set free, i shall not have this brightness; and i can do that in this way:--if i place over the jet this wire-gauze cap, as you see, and then light the gas over it, it burns with a non-luminous flame, owing to its having plenty of air mixed with it before it burns; and if i raise the gauze, you see it does not burn below[ ]. there is plenty of carbon in the gas; but, because the atmosphere can get to it, and mix with it before it burns, you see how pale and blue the flame is. and if i blow upon a bright gas-flame, so as to consume all this carbon before it gets heated to the glowing point, it will also burn blue: [the lecturer illustrated his remarks by blowing on the gas-light.] the only reason why i have not the same bright light when i thus blow upon the flame is, that the carbon meets with sufficient air to burn it before it gets separated in the flame in a free state. the difference is solely due to the solid particles not being separated before the gas is burnt. you observe that there are certain products as the result of the combustion of a candle, and that of these products one portion may be considered as charcoal, or soot; that charcoal, when afterwards burnt, produces some other product; and it concerns us very much now to ascertain what that other product is. we shewed that something was going away; and i want you now to understand how much is going up into the air; and for that purpose we will have combustion on a little larger scale. from that candle ascends heated air, and two or three experiments will shew you the ascending current; but, in order to give you a notion of the quantity of matter which ascends in this way, i will make an experiment by which i shall try to imprison some of the products of this combustion. for this purpose i have here what boys call a fire-balloon. i use this fire-balloon merely as a sort of measure of the result of the combustion we are considering; and i am about to make a flame in such an easy and simple manner as shall best serve my present purpose. this plate shall be the "cup," we will so say, of the candle; this spirit shall be our fuel; and i am about to place this chimney over it, because it is better for me to do so than to let things proceed at random. [illustration: fig. .] mr. anderson will now light the fuel, and here at the top we shall get the results of the combustion. what we get at the top of that tube is exactly the same, generally speaking, as you get from the combustion of a candle; but we do not get a luminous flame here, because we use a substance which is feeble in carbon. i am about to put this balloon--not into action, because that is not my object--but to shew you the effect which results from the action of those products which arise from the candle, as they arise here from the furnace. [the balloon was held over the chimney, when it immediately commenced to fill.] you see how it is disposed to ascend; but we must not let it up, because it might come in contact with those upper gas-lights, and that would be very inconvenient. [the upper gas-lights were turned out, at the request of the lecturer, and the balloon was allowed to ascend.] does not that shew you what a large bulk of matter is being evolved? now, there is going through this tube [placing a large glass tube over a candle] all the products of that candle, and you will presently see that the tube will become quite opaque. suppose i take another candle, and place it under a jar, and then put a light on the other side, just to shew you what is going on. you see that the sides of the jar become cloudy, and the light begins to burn feebly. it is the products, you see, which make the light so dim, and this is the same thing which makes the sides of the jar so opaque. if you go home and take a spoon that has been in the cold air, and hold it over a candle--not so as to soot it--you will find that it becomes dim, just as that jar is dim. if you can get a silver dish, or something of that kind, you will make the experiment still better. and now, just to carry your thoughts forward to the time we shall next meet, let me tell you that it is _water_ which causes the dimness; and when we next meet. i will shew you that we can make it, without difficulty, assume the form of a liquid. lecture iii. products: water from the combustion--nature of water--a compound--hydrogen. i dare say you will remember that when we parted we had just mentioned the word "products" from the candle. for when a candle burns we found we were able, by nice adjustment, to get various products from it. there was one substance which was not obtained when the candle was burning properly, which was charcoal or smoke; and there was some other substance that went upwards from the flame which did not appear as smoke, but took some other form, and made part of that general current which, ascending from the candle upwards, becomes invisible, and escapes. there were also other products to mention. you remember that in that rising current having its origin at the candle, we found that one part was condensable against a cold spoon, or against a clean plate, or any other cold thing, and another part was incondensable. we will first take the condensable part, and examine it; and, strange to say, we find that that part of the product is just water--nothing but water. on the last occasion i spoke of it incidentally, merely saying that water was produced among the condensable products of the candle; but to-day i wish to draw your attention to water, that we may examine it carefully, especially in relation to this subject, and also with respect to its general existence on the surface of the globe. now, having previously arranged an experiment for the purpose of condensing water from the products of the candle, my next point will be to shew you this water; and perhaps one of the best means that i can adopt for shewing its presence to so many at once, is to exhibit a very visible action of water, and then to apply that test to what is collected as a drop at the bottom of that vessel. i have here a chemical substance, discovered by sir humphrey davy, which has a very energetic action upon water, which i shall use as a test of the presence of water. if i take a little piece of it--it is called potassium, as coming from potash,--if i take a little piece of it, and throw it into that basin, you see how it shews the presence of water by lighting up and floating about, burning with a violent flame. i am now going to take away the candle which has been burning beneath the vessel containing ice and salt, and you see a drop of water--a condensed product of the candle--hanging from under the surface of the dish. [illustration: fig. .] i will shew you that potassium has the same action upon it as upon the water in that basin in the experiment we have just tried. see, it takes fire, and burns in just the same manner. i will take another drop upon this glass slab, and when i put the potassium on to it, you see at once, from its taking fire, that there is water present. now, that water was produced by the candle. in the same manner, if i put this spirit-lamp under that jar, you will soon see the latter become damp, from the dew which is deposited upon it--that dew being the result of combustion; and i have no doubt you will shortly see by the drops of water which fall upon the paper below, that there is a good deal of water produced from the combustion of the lamp. i will let it remain, and you can afterwards see how much water has been collected. so, if i take a gas-lamp, and put any cooling arrangement over it, i shall get water--water being likewise produced from the combustion of gas. here, in this bottle, is a quantity of water--perfectly pure, distilled water, produced from the combustion of a gas-lamp--in no point different from the water that you distil from the river, or ocean, or spring, but exactly the same thing. water is one individual thing--it never changes. we can add to it by careful adjustment, for a little while, or we can take it apart, and get other things from it; but water, as water, remains always the same, either in a solid, liquid, or fluid state. here, again [holding another bottle], is some water produced by the combustion of an oil-lamp. a pint of oil, when burnt fairly and properly, produces rather more than a pint of water. here, again, is some water, produced by a rather long experiment from a wax candle. and so we can go on with almost all combustible substances, and find that if they burn with a flame, as a candle, they produce water. you may make these experiments yourselves. the head of a poker is a very good thing to try with, and if it remains cold long enough over the candle, you may get water condensed in drops on it; or a spoon or ladle, or anything else may be used, provided it be clean, and can carry off the heat, and so condense the water. and now--to go into the history of this wonderful production of water from combustibles, and by combustion--i must first of all tell you that this water may exist in different conditions; and although you may now be acquainted with all its forms, they still require us to give a little attention to them for the present, so that we may perceive how the water, whilst it goes through its protean changes, is entirely and absolutely the same thing, whether it is produced from a candle, by combustion, or from the rivers or ocean. first of all, water, when at the coldest, is ice. now, we philosophers---i hope that i may class you and myself together in this case--speak of water as water, whether it be in its solid, or liquid, or gaseous state,--we speak of it chemically as water. water is a thing compounded of two substances, one of which we have derived from the candle, and the other we shall find elsewhere. water may occur as ice; and you have had most excellent opportunities lately of seeing this. ice changes back into water--for we had on our last sabbath a strong instance of this change, by the sad catastrophe which occurred in our own house, as well as in the houses of many of our friends,--ice changes back into water when the temperature is raised: water also changes into steam when it is warmed enough. the water which we have here before us is in its densest state[ ], and although it changes in weight, in condition, in form, and in many other qualities, it still is water; and whether we alter it into ice by cooling, or whether we change it into steam by heat, it increases in volume,--in the one case very strangely and powerfully, and in the other case very largely and wonderfully. for instance, i will now take this tin cylinder, and pour a little water into it; and seeing how much water i pour in, you may easily estimate for yourselves how high it will rise in the vessel: it will cover the bottom about two inches. i am now about to convert the water into steam, for the purpose of shewing to you the different volumes which water occupies in its different states of water and steam. let us now take the case of water changing into ice: we can effect that by cooling it in a mixture of salt and pounded ice[ ]; and i shall do so to shew you the expansion of water into a thing of larger bulk when it is so changed. these bottles [holding one] are made of strong cast iron, very strong and very thick--i suppose they are the third of an inch in thickness; they are very carefully filled with water, so as to exclude all air, and then they are screwed down tight. we shall see that when we freeze the water in these iron vessels, they will not be able to hold the ice, and the expansion within them will break them in pieces as these [pointing to some fragments] are broken, which have been bottles of exactly the same kind. i am about to put these two bottles into that mixture of ice and salt, for the purpose of shewing that when water becomes ice, it changes in volume in this extraordinary way. in the mean time look at the change which has taken place in the water to which we have applied heat--it is losing its fluid state. you may tell this by two or three circumstances. i have covered the mouth of this glass flask, in which water is boiling, with a watch-glass. do you see what happens? it rattles away like a valve chattering, because the steam rising from the boiling water sends the valve up and down, and forces itself out, and so makes it clatter. you can very easily perceive that the flask is quite full of steam, or else it would not force its way out. you see, also, that the flask contains a substance very much larger than the water, for it fills the whole of the flask over and over again, and there it is blowing away into the air; and yet you cannot observe any great diminution in the bulk of the water, which shews you that its change of bulk is very great when it becomes steam. i have put our iron bottles containing water into this freezing mixture, that you may see what happens. no communication will take place, you observe, between the water in the bottles and the ice in the outer vessel. but there will be a conveyance of heat from the one to the other; and if we are successful--we are making our experiment in very great haste--i expect you will by-and-by, so soon as the cold has taken possession of the bottles and their contents, hear a pop on the occasion of the bursting of the one bottle or the other; and, when we come to examine the bottles, we shall find their contents masses of ice, partly enclosed by the covering of iron which is too small for them, because the ice is larger in bulk than the water. you know very well that ice floats upon water: if a boy falls through a hole into the water, he tries to get on the ice again to float him up. why does the ice float?--think of that, and philosophise. because the ice is larger than the quantity of water which can produce it; and therefore the ice weighs the lighter, and the water is the heavier. to return now to the action of heat on water. see what a stream of vapour is issuing from this tin vessel! you observe, we must have made it quite full of steam to have it sent out in that great quantity. and now, as we can convert the water into steam by heat, we convert it back into liquid water by the application of cold. and if we take a glass, or any other cold thing, and hold it over this steam, see how soon it gets damp with water; it will condense it until the glass is warm--it condenses the water which is now running down the sides of it. i have here another experiment to shew the condensation of water from a vaporous state back into a liquid state, in the same way as the vapour, one of the products of the candle, was condensed against the bottom of the dish, and obtained in the form of water; and to shew you how truly and thoroughly these changes take place, i will take this tin flask, which is now full of steam, and close the top. we shall see what takes place when we cause this water or steam to return back to the fluid state by pouring some cold water on the outside. [the lecturer poured the cold water over the vessel, when it immediately collapsed.] you see what has happened. if i had closed the stopper, and still kept the heat applied to it, it would have burst the vessel; yet, when the steam returns to the state of water, the vessel collapses, there being a vacuum produced inside by the condensation of the steam. i shew you these experiments for the purpose of pointing out that in all these occurrences there is nothing that changes the water into any other thing--it still remains water; and so the vessel is obliged to give way, and is crushed inwards, as in the other case, by the further application of heat, it would have been blown outwards. [illustration: fig. .] and what do you think the bulk of that water is when it assumes the vaporous condition? you see that cube [pointing to a cubic foot]. there, by its side, is a cubic inch, exactly the same shape as the cubic foot, and that bulk of water [the cubic inch] is sufficient to expand into that bulk [the cubic foot] of steam; and, on the contrary, the application of cold will contract that large quantity of steam into this small quantity of water. [illustration: fig. .] [one of the iron bottles burst at that moment.] ah! there is one of our bottles burst, and here you see is a crack down one side an eighth of an inch in width. [the other now exploded, sending the freezing mixture in all directions.] this other bottle is also broken; although the iron was nearly half-an-inch thick, the ice has burst it asunder. these changes always take place in water: they do not require to be always produced by artificial means,--we only use them here because we want to produce a small winter round that little bottle, instead of a long and severe one. but if you go to canada, or to the north, you will find the temperature there out of doors will do the same thing as has been done here by the freezing mixture. to return to our quiet philosophy. we shall not in future be deceived, therefore, by any changes that are produced in water. water is the same everywhere, whether produced from the ocean or from the flame of the candle. where, then, is this water which we get from a candle? i must anticipate a little, and tell you. it evidently comes, as to part of it, from the candle; but is it within the candle beforehand? no. it is not in the candle; and it is not in the air round about the candle which is necessary for its combustion. it is neither in one nor the other, but it comes from their conjoint action, a part from the candle, a part from the air; and this we have now to trace, so that we may understand thoroughly what is the chemical history of a candle when we have it burning on our table. how shall we get at this? i myself know plenty of ways, but i want _you_ to get at it from the association in your own minds of what i have already told you. i think you can see a little in this way. we had just now the case of a substance which acted upon the water in the way that sir humphrey davy shewed us[ ], and which i am now going to recall to your minds by making again an experiment upon that dish. it is a thing which we have to handle very carefully, for you see, if i allow a little splash of water to come upon this mass, it sets fire to part of it; and if there were free access of air, it would quickly set fire to the whole. now, this is a metal--a beautiful and bright metal--which rapidly changes in the air, and, as you know, rapidly changes in water. i will put a piece on the water, and you see it burns beautifully, making a floating lamp, using the water in the place of air. again, if we take a few iron filings or turnings, and put them in water, we find that they likewise undergo an alteration. they do not change so much as this potassium does, but they change somewhat in the same way; they become rusty, and shew an action upon the water, though in a different degree of intensity to what this beautiful metal does: but they act upon the water in the same manner generally as this potassium. i want you to put these different facts together in your minds. i have another metal here [zinc], and when we examined it with regard to the solid substance produced by its combustion, we had an opportunity of seeing that it burned; and i suppose, if i take a little strip of this zinc and put it over the candle, you will see something half-way, as it were, between the combustion of potassium on the water and the action of iron,--you see there is a sort of combustion. it has burned, leaving a white ash or residuum, and here also we find that the metal has a certain amount of action upon water. by degrees we have learned how to modify the action of these different substances, and to make them tell us what we want to know. and now, first of all, i take iron. it is a common thing in all chemical reactions, where we get any result of this kind, to find that it is increased by the action of heat; and if we want to examine minutely and carefully the action of bodies one upon another, we often have to refer to the action of heat. you are aware, i believe, that iron-filings burn beautifully in the air; but i am about to shew you an experiment of this kind, because it will impress upon you what i am going to say about iron in its action on water. if i take a flame and make it hollow;--you know why, because i want to get air to it and into it, and therefore i make it hollow--and then take a few iron-filings and drop them into the flame, you see how well they burn. that combustion results from the chemical action which is going on when we ignite those particles. and so we proceed to consider these different effects, and ascertain what iron will do when it meets with water. it will tell us the story so beautifully, so gradually and regularly, that i think it will please you very much. i have here a furnace with a pipe going through it like an iron gun-barrel, and i have stuffed that barrel full of bright iron-turnings, and placed it across the fire, to be made red-hot. we can either send air through the barrel to come in contact with the iron, or we can send steam from this little boiler at the end of the barrel. here is a stop-cock which shuts off the steam from the barrel until we wish to admit it. there is some water in these glass jars, which i have coloured blue, so that you may see what happens. now, you know very well that any steam i might send through that barrel, if it went through into the water, would be condensed; for you have seen that steam cannot retain its gaseous form if it be cooled down. [illustration: fig. .] you saw it here [pointing to the tin flask] crushing itself into a small bulk, and causing the flask holding it to collapse; so that if i were to send steam through that barrel, it would be condensed--supposing the barrel were cold: it is, therefore, heated to perform the experiment i am now about to shew you. i am going to send the steam through the barrel in small quantities; and you shall judge for yourselves, when you see it issue from the other end, whether it still remains steam. steam is condensible into water, and when you lower the temperature of steam, you convert it back into fluid water; but i have lowered the temperature of the gas which i have collected in this jar, by passing it through water after it has traversed the iron barrel, and still it does not change back into water. i will take another test and apply to this gas. (i hold the jar in an inverted position, or my substance would escape.) if i now apply a light to the mouth of the jar, it ignites with a slight noise. that tells you that it is not steam. steam puts out a fire--it does not burn; but you saw that what i had in that jar burnt. we may obtain this substance equally from water produced from the candle-flame as from any other source. when it is obtained by the action of the iron upon the aqueous vapour, it leaves the iron in a state very similar to that in which these filings were after they were burnt. it makes the iron heavier than it was before. so long as the iron remains in the tube and is heated, and is cooled again without the access of air or water, it does not change in its weight; but after having had this current of steam passed over it, it then comes out heavier that it was before, having taken something out of the steam, and having allowed something else to pass forth, which we see here. and now, as we have another jar full, i will shew you something most interesting. it is a combustible gas; and i might at once take this jar and set fire to the contents, and shew you that it is combustible; but i intend to shew you more if i can. it is also a very light substance. steam will condense: this body will rise in the air, and not condense. [illustration: fig. ] suppose i take another glass jar, empty of all but air: if i examine it with a taper, i shall find that it contains nothing but air. i will now take this jar full of the gas that i am speaking of, and deal with it as though it were a light body. i will hold both upside-down, and turn the one up under the other; and that which did contain the gas procured from the steam, what does it contain now? you will find it now only contains air. but look! here is the combustible substance [taking the other jar] which i have poured out of the one jar into the other. it still preserves its quality, and condition, and independence, and therefore is the more worthy of our consideration, as belonging to the products of a candle. now, this substance which we have just prepared by the action of iron on the steam or water, we can also get by means of those other things which you have already seen act so well upon the water. if i take a piece of potassium, and make the necessary arrangements, it will produce this gas; and if, instead, a piece of zinc, i find, when i come to examine it very carefully, that the main reason why this zinc cannot act upon the water continuously as the other metal does, is because the result of the action of the water envelopes the zinc in a kind of protecting coat. we have learned in consequence, that if we put into our vessel only the zinc and water, they by themselves do not give rise to much action, and we get no result. but suppose i proceed to dissolve off this varnish--this encumbering substance--which i can do by a little acid; the moment i do this, i find the zinc acting upon the water exactly as the iron did, but at the common temperature. the acid in no way is altered, except in its combination with the oxide of zinc, which is produced. i have now poured the acid into the glass, and the effect is as though i were applying heat to cause this boiling up. there is something coming off from the zinc very abundantly, which is not steam. there is a jar full of it; and you will find that i have exactly the same combustible substance remaining in the vessel, when i hold it upside-down, that i produced during the experiment with the iron barrel. this is what we get from water--the same substance which is contained in the candle. [illustration: fig. .] let us now trace distinctly the connection between these two points. this is hydrogen--a body classed among those things which in chemistry we call elements, because we can get nothing else out of them. a candle is not an elementary body, because we can get carbon out of it; we can get this hydrogen out of it, or at least out of the water which it supplies. and this gas has been so named hydrogen, because it is that element which, in association with another, generates water. [footnote: [greek: hudos], "water," and [greek: gennao], "i generate."] mr. anderson having now been able to get two or three jars of gas, we shall have a few experiments to make, and i want to shew you the best way of making these experiments. i am not afraid to shew you, for i wish you to make experiments, if you will only make them with care and attention, and the assent of those around you. as we advance in chemistry, we are obliged to deal with substances which are rather injurious, if in their wrong places--the acids, and heat, and combustible things we use, might do harm if carelessly employed. if you want to make hydrogen, you can make it easily from bits of zinc, and sulphuric or muriatic acid. here is what in former times was called the "philosopher's candle." it is a little phial with a cork, and a tube or pipe passing through it. [illustration: fig. .] and i am now putting a few little pieces of zinc into it. this little instrument i am going to apply to a useful purpose in our demonstrations--for i want to shew you that you can prepare hydrogen, and make some experiments with it as you please at your own homes. let me here tell you why i am so careful to fill this phial nearly, and yet not quite full. i do it because the evolved gas, which, as you have seen, is very combustible, is explosive to a considerable extent when mixed with air, and might lead to harm, if you were to apply a light to the end of that pipe before all the air had been swept out of the space above the water. i am now about to pour in the sulphuric acid. i have used very little zinc, and more sulphuric acid and water, because i want to keep it at work for some time. i therefore take care in this way to modify the proportions of the ingredients, so that i may have a regular supply--not too quick, and not too slow. supposing i now take a glass and put it upside-down over the end of the tube, because the hydrogen is light i expect that it will remain in that vessel a little while. we will now test the contents of our glass to see if there be hydrogen in it. i think i am safe in saying we have caught some [applying a light]. there it is, you see. i will now apply a light to the top of the tube. there is the hydrogen burning. there is our philosophical candle. it is a foolish feeble sort of a flame, you may say; but it is so hot that scarcely any common flame gives out so much heat. it goes on burning regularly, and i am now about to put that flame to burn under a certain arrangement, in order that we may examine its results and make use of the information which we may thereby acquire. inasmuch as the candle produces water, and this gas comes out of the water, let us see what this gives us by the same process of combustion that the candle went through when it burnt in the atmosphere; and for that purpose i am going to put the lamp under this apparatus, in order to condense whatever may arise from the combustion within it in the course of a short time you will see moisture appearing in the cylinder, and you will get the water running down the side; and the water from this hydrogen flame will have absolutely the same effect upon all our tests, being obtained by the same general process as in the former case. this hydrogen is a very beautiful substance. it is so light that it carries things up: it is far lighter than the atmosphere; and i dare say i can shew you this by an experiment which, if you are very clever, some of you may even have skill enough to repeat. here is our generator of hydrogen, and here are some soap-suds. i have an india-rubber tube connected with the hydrogen generator, and at the end of the tube is a tobacco-pipe. [illustration: fig. .] i can thus put the pipe into the suds, and blow bubbles by means of the hydrogen. you observe how the bubbles fall downwards when i blow them with my warm breath; but notice the difference when i blow them with hydrogen. [the lecturer here blew bubbles with hydrogen, which rose to the roof of the theatre.] it shews you how light this gas must be in order to carry with it not merely the ordinary soap-bubble, but the larger portion of a drop hanging to the bottom of it. i can shew its lightness in a better way than this; larger bubbles than these may be so lifted up; indeed, in former times balloons used to be filled with this gas. mr. anderson will fasten this tube on to our generator, and we shall have a stream of hydrogen here with which we can charge this balloon made of collodion. i need not even be very careful to get all the air out, for i know the power of this gas to carry it up. [two collodion balloons were inflated, and sent up, one being held by a string.] here is another larger one made of thin membrane, which we will fill and allow to ascend. you will see they will all remain floating about until the gas escapes. what, then, are the comparative weights of these substances? i have a table here which will shew you the proportion which their weights bear to each other. i have taken a pint and a cubic foot as the measures, and have placed opposite to them the respective figures. a pint measure of this hydrogen weighs three-quarters of our smallest weight (a grain), and a cubic foot weighs one-twelfth of an ounce; whereas a pint of water weighs , grains, and a cubic foot of water weighs almost , ounces. you see, therefore, what a vast difference there is between the weight of a cubic foot of water and a cubic foot of hydrogen. hydrogen gives rise to no substance that can become solid, either during combustion or afterwards as a product of its combustion. but when it burns, it produces water only; and if we take a cold glass and put it over the flame, it becomes damp, and you have water, produced immediately in appreciable quantity; and nothing is produced by its combustion but the same water which you have seen the flame of the candle produce. it is important to remember that this hydrogen is the only thing in nature which furnishes water as the sole product of combustion. and now we must endeavour to find some additional proof of the general character and composition of water; and for this purpose i will keep you a little longer, so that at our next meeting we may be better prepared for the subject. we have the power of arranging the zinc which you have seen acting upon the water by the assistance of an acid, in such a manner as to cause all the power to be evolved in the place where we require it i have behind me a voltaic pile, and i am just about to shew you, at the end of this lecture, its character and power, that you may see what we shall have to deal with when next we meet. i hold here the extremities of the wires which transport the power from behind me, and which i shall cause to act on the water. we have previously seen what a power of combustion is possessed by the potassium, or the zinc, or the iron-filings; but none of them shew such energy as this. [the lecturer here made contact between the two terminal wires of the battery, when a brilliant flash of light was produced.] this light is, in fact, produced by a forty-zinc power of burning: it is a power that i can carry about in my hands, through these wires, at pleasure--although, if i applied it wrongly to myself, it would destroy me in an instant, for it is a most intense thing, and the power you see here put forth while you count five [bringing the poles in contact, and exhibiting the electric light] is equivalent to the power of several thunder-storms, so great is its force[ ]. and that you may see what intense energy it has, i will take the ends of the wires which convey the power from the battery, and with it i dare say i can burn this iron file. now, this is a chemical power, and one which, when we next meet, i shall apply to water, and shew you what results we are able to produce. lecture iv. hydrogen in the candle--burns into water--the other part of water--oxygen. i see you are not tired of the candle yet, or i am sure you would not be interested in the subject in the way you are. when our candle was burning, we found it produced water exactly like the water we have around us; and by further examination of this water we found in it that curious body, hydrogen--that light substance of which there is some in this jar. we afterwards saw the burning powers of that hydrogen, and that it produced water. and i think i introduced to your notice an apparatus which i very briefly said was an arrangement of chemical force, or power, or energy, so adjusted as to convey its power to us in these wires; and i said i should use that force to pull the water to pieces, to see what else there was in the water besides hydrogen; because, you remember, when we passed the water through the iron tube, we by no means got the weight of water back which we put in, in the form of steam, though we had a very large quantity of gas evolved. we have now to see what is the other substance present. that you may understand the character and use of this instrument, let us make an experiment or two. let us put together, first of all, some substances, knowing what they are, and then see what that instrument does to them. there is some copper (observe the various changes which it can undergo), and here is some nitric acid, and you will find that this, being a strong chemical agent, will act very powerfully when i add it to the copper. it is now sending forth a beautiful red vapour; but as we do not want that vapour, mr. anderson will hold it near the chimney for a short time, that we may have the use and beauty of the experiment without the annoyance. the copper which i have put into the flask will dissolve: it will change the acid and the water into a blue fluid, containing copper and other things; and i propose then shewing you how this voltaic battery deals with it; and in the mean-time we will arrange another kind of experiment for you to see what power it has. this is a substance which is to us like water--that is to say, it contains bodies which we do not know of as yet, as water contains a body which we do not know as yet. now, this solution of a salt[ ] i will put upon paper, and spread about, and apply the power of the battery to it, and observe what will happen. three or four important things will happen which we shall take advantage of. i place this wetted paper upon a sheet of tinfoil, which is convenient for keeping all clean, and also for the advantageous application of the power; and this solution, you see, is not at all affected by being put upon the paper or tinfoil, nor by anything else i have brought in contact with it yet, and which, therefore, is free to us to use as regards that instrument. but first let us see that our instrument is in order. here are our wires. let us see whether it is in the state in which it was last time. we can soon tell. as yet, when i bring them together, we have no power, because the conveyers--what we call the electrodes--the passages or ways for the electricity--are stopped; but now mr. anderson by that [referring to a sudden flash at the ends of the wires] has given me a telegram to say that it is ready. before i begin our experiment i will get mr. anderson to break contact again at the battery behind me, and we will put a platinum-wire across to connect the poles, and then if i find i can ignite a pretty good length of this wire, we shall be safe in our experiment. now you will see the power. [the connection was established, and the intermediate wire became red-hot.] there is the power running beautifully through the wire, which i have made thin on purpose to shew you that we have those powerful forces; and now, having that power, we will proceed with it to the examination of water. i have here two pieces of platinum, and if i lay them down upon this piece of paper [the moistened paper on the tinfoil], you will see no action; and if i take them up, there is no change that you can see, but the arrangement remains just as it was before. but, now, see what happens: if i take these two poles and put either one or the other of them down separately on the platinum-plates, they do nothing for me, both are perfectly without action; but if i let them both be in contact at the same moment, see what happens [a brown spot appeared under each pole of the battery]. look here at the effect that takes place, and see how i have pulled something apart from the white--something brown; and i have no doubt, if i were to arrange it thus, and were to put one of the poles to the tinfoil on the other side of the paper--why, i get such a beautiful action upon the paper, that i am going to see whether i cannot write with it--a telegram, if you please. [the lecturer here traced the word "juvenile" on the paper with one of the terminal wires.] see there how beautifully we can get our results! you see we have here drawn something, which we have not known about before, out of this solution. let us now take that flask from mr. andersen's hands, and see what we can draw out of that. this, you know, is a liquid which we have just made up from copper and nitric acid, whilst our other experiments were in hand; and though i am making this experiment very hastily, and may bungle a little, yet i prefer to let you see what i do rather than prepare it beforehand. now, see what happens. these two platinum-plates are the two ends (or i will make them so immediately) of this apparatus; and i am about to put them in contact with that solution just as we did a moment ago on the paper. it does not matter to us whether the solution be on the paper or whether it be in the jar, so long as we bring the ends of the apparatus to it. if i put the two platinums in by themselves, they come out as clean and as white as they go in [inserting them into the fluid without connecting them with the battery]; but when we take the power and lay that on [the platinums were connected with the battery and again dipped into the solution], this, you see [exhibiting one of the platinums], is at once turned into copper, as it were: it has become like a plate of copper; and that [exhibiting the other piece of platinum] has come out quite clean. if i take this coppered piece and change sides, the copper will leave the right-hand side and come over to the left side; what was before the coppered plate comes out clean, and the plate which was clean comes out coated with copper; and thus you see that the same copper we put into this solution we can also take out of it by means of this instrument. putting that solution aside, let us now see what effect this instrument will have upon water. here are two little platinum-plates which i intend to make the ends of the battery, and this (c) is a little vessel so shaped as to enable me to take it to pieces, and shew you its construction. in these two cups (a and b) i pour mercury, which touches the ends of the wires connected with the platinum-plates. in the vessel (c) i pour some water containing a little acid (but which is put only for the purpose of facilitating the action; it undergoes no change in the process), and connected with the top of the vessel is a bent glass tube (d), which may remind you of the pipe which was connected with the gun barrel in our furnace experiment, and which now passes under the jar (f). i have now adjusted this apparatus, and we will proceed to affect the water in some way or other. in the other case, i sent the water through a tube which was made red-hot; i am now going to pass the electricity through the contents of this vessel. perhaps i may boil the water; if i do boil the water, i shall get steam; and you know that steam condenses when it gets cold, and you will therefore see by that whether i do boil the water or not. perhaps, however, i shall not boil the water, but produce some other effect. you shall have the experiment and see. there is one wire which i will put to this side (a), and here is the other wire which i will put to the other side (b), and you will soon see whether any disturbance takes place. here it is seeming to boil up famously; but does it boil? let us see whether that which goes out is steam or not. i think you will soon see the jar (f) will be filled with vapour, if that which rises from the water is steam. but can it be steam? why, certainly not; because there it remains, you see, unchanged. there it is standing over the water, and it cannot therefore be steam, but must be a permanent gas of some sort what is it? is it hydrogen? is it anything else? well, we will examine it. if it is hydrogen, it will burn. [the lecturer then ignited a portion of the gas collected, which burnt with an explosion.] [illustration: fig. ] it is certainly something combustible, but not combustible in the way that hydrogen is. hydrogen would not have given you that noise; but the colour of that light, when the thing did burn, was like that of hydrogen: it will, however, burn without contact with the air. that is why i have chosen this other form of apparatus, for the purpose of pointing out to you what are the particular circumstances of this experiment. in place of an open vessel i have taken one that is closed (our battery is so beautifully active that we are even boiling the mercury, and getting all things right--not wrong, but vigorously right); and i am going to shew you that that gas, whatever it may be, can burn without air, and in that respect differs from a candle, which cannot burn without the air. and our manner of doing this is as follows:--i have here a glass vessel (g) which is fitted with two platinum-wires (ik), through which i can apply electricity; and we can put the vessel on the air-pump and exhaust the air, and when we have taken the air out we can bring it here and fasten it on to this jar (f), and let into the vessel that gas which was formed by the action of the voltaic battery upon the water, and which we have produced by changing the water into it,--for i may go as far as this, and say we have really, by that experiment, changed the water into that gas. we have not only altered its condition, but we have changed it really and truly into that gaseous substance, and all the water is there which was decomposed by the experiment. as i screw this vessel (gh) on here (h), and make the tubes well connected, and when i open the stop-cocks (hhh), if you watch the level of the water (in f), you will see that the gas will rise. i will now close the stop-cocks, as i have drawn up as much as the vessel can hold, and being safely conveyed into that chamber, i will pass into it an electric spark from this leyden jar (l), when the vessel, which is now quite clear and bright, will become dim. there will be no sound, for the vessel is strong enough to confine the explosion. [a spark was then passed through the jar, when the explosive mixture was ignited.] did you see that brilliant light? if i again screw the vessel on to the jar, and open these stop-cocks, you will see that the gas will rise a second time. [the stop-cocks were then opened.] those gases [referring to the gases first collected in the jar, and which had just been ignited by the electric spark] have disappeared, as you see: their place is vacant, and fresh gas has gone in. water has been formed from them; and if we repeat our operation [repeating the last experiment], i shall have another vacancy, as you will see by the water rising. i always have an empty vessel after the explosion, because the vapour or gas into which that water has been resolved by the battery explodes under the influence of the spark, and changes into water; and by-and-by you will see in this upper vessel some drops of water trickling down the sides and collecting at the bottom. we are here dealing with water entirely, without reference to the atmosphere. the water of the candle had the atmosphere helping to produce it; but in this way it can be produced independently of the air. water, therefore, ought to contain that other substance which the candle takes from the air, and which, combining with the hydrogen, produces water. just now you saw that one end of this battery took hold of the copper, extracting it from the vessel which contained the blue solution. it was effected by this wire; and surely we may say, if the battery has such power with a metallic solution which we made and unmade, may we not find that it is possible to split asunder the component parts of the water, and put them into this place and that place? suppose i take the poles--the metallic ends of this battery--and see what will happen with the water in this apparatus (fig. ), where we have separated the two ends far apart. [illustration: fig. .] i place one here (at a), and the other there (at b), and i have little shelves with holes which i can put upon each pole, and so arrange them that whatever escapes from the two ends of the battery will appear as separate gases; for you saw that the water did not become vaporous, but gaseous. the wires are now in perfect and proper connection with the vessel containing the water; and you see the bubbles rising: let us collect these bubbles and see what they are. here is a glass cylinder (o); i fill it with water and put it over one end (a) of the pile; and i will take another (h) and put it over the other end (b) of the pile. and so now we have a double apparatus, with both places delivering gas. both these jars will fill with gas. there they go, that to the right (h) filling very rapidly; the one to the left (o) filling not so rapidly; and though i have allowed some bubbles to escape, yet still the action is going on pretty regularly; and were it not that one is rather smaller than the other, you would see that i should have twice as much in this (h) as i have in that (o). both these gases are colourless; they stand over the water without condensing; they are alike in all things--i mean in all _apparent_ things; and we have here an opportunity of examining these bodies and ascertaining what they are. their bulk is large, and we can easily apply experiments to them. i will take this jar (h) first, and will ask you to be prepared to recognise hydrogen. think of all its qualities--the light gas which stood well in inverted vessels, burning with a pale flame at the mouth of the jar--and see whether this gas does not satisfy all these conditions. if it be hydrogen, it will remain here while i hold this jar inverted. [a light was then applied, when the hydrogen burnt] what is there now in the other jar? you know that the two together made an explosive mixture. but what can this be which we find as the other constituent in water, and which must therefore be that substance which made the hydrogen burn? we know that the water we put into the vessel consisted of the two things together. we find one of these is hydrogen: what must that other be which was in the water before the experiment, and which we now have by itself? i am about to put this lighted splinter of wood into the gas. the gas itself will not burn, but it will make the splinter of wood burn. [the lecturer ignited the end of the wood, and introduced it into the jar of gas.] see how it invigorates the combustion of the wood, and how it makes it burn far better than the air would make it burn; and now you see by itself that every other substance which is contained in the water, and which, when the water was formed by the burning of the candle, must have been taken from the atmosphere. what shall we call it, a, b, or c? let us call it o--call it "oxygen:" it is a very good distinct-sounding name. this, then, is the oxygen which was present in the water, forming so large a part of it. we shall now begin to understand more clearly our experiments and researches; because, when we have examined these things once or twice, we shall soon see why a candle burns in the air. when we have in this way analysed the water--that is to say, separated, or electrolysed its parts out of it--we get two volumes of hydrogen, and one of the body that burns it. and these two are represented to us on the following diagram, with their weights also stated; and we shall find that the oxygen is a very heavy body by comparison with the hydrogen. it is the other element in water. i had better, perhaps, tell you now how we get this oxygen abundantly, having shewn you how we can separate it from the water. oxygen, as you will immediately imagine, exists in the atmosphere; for how should the candle burn to produce water without it? _____________________ | | | | | | | | | | | oxygen. | oxygen, . . . . . | | | | |_________| hydrogen, . . . . | hydrogen. | ----- | | water,. . . . . . | | | | | | |___________| such a thing would be absolutely impossible, and chemically impossible, without oxygen. [illustration: fig. .] can we get it from the air? well, there are some very complicated and difficult processes by which we can get it from the air; but we have better processes. there is a substance called the black oxide of manganese: it is a very black-looking mineral, but very useful, and when made red-hot it gives out oxygen. here is an iron bottle which has had some of this substance put into it, and there is a tube fixed to it, and a fire ready made, and mr. anderson will put that retort into the fire, for it is made of iron, and can stand the heat. here is a salt called chlorate of potassa, which is now made in large quantities for bleaching, and chemical and medical uses, and for pyrotechnic and other purposes. i will take some and mix it with some of the oxide of manganese (oxide of copper, or oxide of iron would do as well); and if i put these together in a retort, far less than a red heat is sufficient to evolve this oxygen from the mixture. i am not preparing to make much, because we only want sufficient for our experiments; only, as you will see immediately, if i use too small a charge, the first portion of the gas will be mixed with the air already in the retort, and i should be obliged to sacrifice the first portion of the gas, because it would be so much diluted with air; the first portion must therefore be thrown away. you will find in this case, that a common spirit-lamp is quite sufficient for me to get the oxygen, and so we shall have two processes going on for its preparation. see how freely the gas is coming over from that small portion of the mixture. we will examine it, and see what are its properties. now, in this way we are producing, as you will observe, a gas just like the one we had in the experiment with the battery, transparent, undissolved by water, and presenting the ordinary visible properties of the atmosphere. (as this first jar contains the air, together with the first portions of the oxygen set free during the preparation, we will carry it out of the way, and be prepared to make our experiments in a regular, dignified manner.) and, inasmuch as that power of making wood, wax, or other things burn, was so marked in the oxygen we obtained by means of the voltaic battery from water, we may expect to find the same property here. we will try it you see there is the combustion of a lighted taper in air, and here is its combustion in this gas [lowering the taper into the jar]. see how brightly and how beautifully it burns! you can also see more than this,--you will perceive it is a heavy gas, whilst the hydrogen would go up like a balloon, or even faster than a balloon, when not encumbered with the weight of the envelope. [illustration: fig. .] you may easily see that although we obtained from water twice as much in volume of the hydrogen as of oxygen, it does not follow that we have twice as much in weight--because one is heavy, and the other a very light gas. we have means of weighing gases or air; but without stopping to explain, that, let me just tell you what their respective weights are. the weight of a pint of hydrogen is three-quarters of a grain; the weight of the same quantity of oxygen is nearly twelve grains. this is a very great difference. the weight of a cubit foot of hydrogen is one-twelfth of an ounce; and the weight of a cubit foot of oxygen is one ounce and a third. and so on we might come to masses of matter which may be weighed in the balance, and which we can take account of as to hundredweights and as to tons, as you will see almost immediately. now, as regards this very property of oxygen supporting combustion, which we may compare to air, i will take a piece of candle to shew it you in a rough way, and the result will be rough. there is our candle burning in the air: how will it burn in oxygen? i have here a jar of this gas, and i am about to put it over the candle for you to compare the action of this gas with that of the air. why, look at it: it looks something like the light you saw at the poles of the voltaic battery. think how vigorous that action must be! and yet, during all that action, nothing more is produced than what is produced by the burning of the candle in air. we have the same production of water, and the same phenomena exactly, when we use this gas instead of air, as we have when the candle is burnt in air. but now we have got a knowledge of this new substance, we can look at it a little more distinctly, in order to satisfy ourselves that we have got a good general understanding of this part of the product of a candle. it is wonderful how great the supporting powers of this substance are as regards combustion. for instance, here is a lamp which, simple though it be, is the original, i may say, of a great variety of lamps which are constructed for divers purposes--for light-houses, microscopic illuminations, and other uses; and if it were proposed to make it burn very brightly, you would say, "if a candle burnt better in oxygen, will not a lamp do the same?" why, it will do so. mr. anderson will give me a tube coming from our oxygen reservoir, and i am about to apply it to this flame, which i will previously make burn badly on purpose. there comes the oxygen: what a combustion that makes! but if i shut it off, what becomes of the lamp? [the flow of oxygen was stopped, and the lamp relapsed to its former dimness.] it is wonderful how, by means of oxygen, we get combustion accelerated. but it does not affect merely the combustion of hydrogen, or carbon, or the candle; but it exalts all combustions of the common kind. we will take one which relates to iron, for instance, as you have already seen iron burn a little in the atmosphere. here is a jar of oxygen, and this is a piece of iron wire; but if it were a bar as thick as my wrist, it would burn the same. [illustration: fig. .] i first attach a little piece of wood to the iron, i then set the wood on fire and let them both down together into the jar. the wood is now alight, and there it burns as wood should burn in oxygen; but it will soon communicate its combustion to the iron. the iron is now burning brilliantly, and will continue so for a long time. as long as we supply oxygen, so long can we carry on the combustion of the iron, until the latter is consumed. we will now put that on one side, and take some other substance; but we must limit our experiments, for we have not time to spare for all the illustrations you would have a right to if we had more time. we will take a piece of sulphur--you know how sulphur burns in the air--well, we put it into the oxygen, and you will see that whatever can burn in air, can burn with a far greater intensity in oxygen, leading you to think that perhaps the atmosphere itself owes all its power of combustion to this gas. the sulphur is now burning very quietly in the oxygen; but you cannot for a moment mistake the very high and increased action which takes place when it is so burnt, instead of being burnt merely in common air. [illustration: fig. .] i am now about to shew you the combustion of another substance--phosphorus. i can do it better for you here than you can do it at home. this is a very combustible substance; and if it be so combustible in air, what might you expect it would be in oxygen? i am about to shew it to you not in its fullest intensity, for if i did so we should almost blow the apparatus up--i may even now crack the jar, though i do not want to break things carelessly. you see how it burns in the air. but what a glorious light it gives out when i introduce it into oxygen! [introducing the lighted phosphorus into the jar of oxygen.] there you see the solid particles going off which cause that combustion to be so brilliantly luminous. thus far we have tested this power of oxygen, and the high combustion it produces by means of other substances. we must now, for a little while longer, look at it as respects the hydrogen. you know, when we allowed the oxygen and the hydrogen derived from the water to mix and burn together, we had a little explosion. you remember, also, that when i burnt the oxygen and the hydrogen in a jet together, we got very little light, but great heat. i am now about to set fire to oxygen and hydrogen, mixed in the proportion in which they occur in water. here is a vessel containing one volume of oxygen and two volumes of hydrogen. this mixture is exactly of the same nature as the gas we just now obtained from the voltaic battery: it would be far too much to burn at once; i have therefore arranged to blow soap-bubbles with it, and burn those bubbles, that we may see by a general experiment or two how this oxygen supports the combustion of the hydrogen. first of all, we will see whether we can blow a bubble. well, there goes the gas [causing it to issue through a tobacco-pipe into some soap-suds]. here i have a bubble. i am receiving them on my hand: and you will perhaps think i am acting oddly in this experiment; but it is to shew you that we must not always trust to noise and sounds, but rather to real facts. [exploding a bubble on the palm of his hand.] i am afraid to fire a bubble from the end of the pipe, because the explosion would pass up into the jar and blow it to pieces. this oxygen then will unite with the hydrogen, as you see by the phenomena, and hear by the sound, with the utmost readiness of action, and all its powers are then taken up in its neutralisation of the qualities of the hydrogen. so now i think you will perceive the whole history of water with reference to oxygen and the air, from what we have before said. why does a piece of potassium decompose water? because it finds oxygen in the water. what is set free when i put it in the water, as i am about to do again? it sets free hydrogen, and the hydrogen burns; but the potassium itself combines with oxygen; and this piece of potassium, in taking the water apart--the water, you may say, derived from the combustion of the candle--takes away the oxygen which the candle took from the air, and so sets the hydrogen free; and even if i take a piece of ice, and put a piece of potassium upon it, the beautiful affinities by which the oxygen and the hydrogen are related are such, that the ice will absolutely set fire to the potassium. i shew this to you to-day, in order to enlarge your ideas of these things, and that you may see how greatly results are modified by circumstances. there is the potassium on the ice, producing a sort of volcanic action. it will be my place, when next we meet, having pointed out these anomalous actions, to shew you that none of these extra and strange effects are met with by us--that none of these strange and injurious actions take place when we are burning, not merely a candle, but gas in our streets, or fuel in our fireplaces, so long as we confine ourselves within the laws that nature has made for our guidance. lecture v. oxygen present in the air--nature of the atmosphere--its properties--other products from the candle--carbonic acid--its properties. we have now seen that we can produce hydrogen and oxygen from the water that we obtained from the candle. hydrogen, you know, comes from the candle, and oxygen, you believe, comes from the air. but then you have a right to ask me, "how is it that the air and the oxygen do not equally well burn the candle?" if you remember what happened when i put a jar of oxygen over a piece of candle, you recollect there was a very different kind of combustion to that which took place in the air. now, why is this? it is a very important question, and one i shall endeavour to make you understand: it relates most intimately to the nature of the atmosphere, and is most important to us. we have several tests for oxygen besides the mere burning of bodies. you have seen a candle burnt in oxygen, or in the air; you have seen phosphorus burnt in the air, or in oxygen; and you have seen iron-filings burnt in oxygen. but we have other tests besides these, and i am about to refer to one or two of them for the purpose of carrying your conviction and your experience further. here we have a vessel of oxygen. i will shew its presence to you: if i take a little spark and put it into that oxygen, you know, by the experience you gained the last time we met, what will happen; if i put that spark into the jar, it will tell you whether we have oxygen here or not. yes! we have proved it by combustion; and now here is another test for oxygen, which is a very curious and useful one. i have here two jars full of gas, with a plate between them to prevent their mixing; i take the plate away, and the gases are creeping one into the other. "what happens?" say you: "they together produce no such combustion as was seen in the case of the candle." but see how the presence of oxygen is told by its association with this other substance[ ]. what a beautifully coloured gas i have obtained in this way, shewing me the presence of the oxygen! in the same way we can try this experiment by mixing common air with this test-gas. here is a jar containing air--such air as the candle would burn in--and here is a jar or bottle containing the test-gas. i let them come together over water, and you see the result: the contents of the test-bottle are flowing into the jar of air, and you see i obtain exactly the same kind of action as before, and that shews me that there is oxygen in the air--the very same substance that has been already obtained by us from the water produced by the candle. but then, beyond that, how is it that the candle does not burn in air as well as in oxygen? we will come to that point at once. i have here two jars; they are filled to the same height with gas, and the appearance to the eye is alike in both, and i really do not know at present which of these jars contains oxygen and which contains air, although i know they have previously been filled with these gases. but here is our test-gas, and i am going to work with the two jars, in order to examine whether there is any difference between them in the quality of reddening this gas. i am now going to turn this test-gas into one of the jars, and observe what happens. there is reddening, you see; there is then oxygen present. we will now test the other jar; but you see this is not so distinctly red as the first: and, further, this curious thing happens,--if i take these two gases and shake them well together with water, we shall absorb the red gas; and then, if i put in more of this test-gas and shake again, we shall absorb more; and i can go on as long as there be any oxygen present to produce that effect. if i let in air, it will not matter; but the moment i introduce water, the red gas disappears; and i may go on in this way, putting in more and more of the test-gas, until i come to something left behind which will not redden any longer by the use of that particular body that rendered the air and the oxygen red. why is that? you see in a moment it is because there is, besides oxygen, something else present which is left behind. i will let a little more air into the jar, and if it turns red you will know that some of that reddening gas is still present, and that consequently it was not for the want of this producing body that that air was left behind. now, you will begin to understand what i am about to say. you saw that when i burnt phosphorus in a jar, as the smoke produced by the phosphorus and the oxygen of the air condensed, it left a good deal of gas unburnt, just as this red gas left something untouched,--there was, in fact, this gas left behind, which the phosphorus cannot touch, which the reddening gas cannot touch, and this something is not oxygen, and yet is part of the atmosphere. so that is one way of opening out air into the two things of which it is composed--oxygen, which burns our candles, our phosphorus, or anything else; and this other substance--nitrogen--which will not burn them. this other part of the air is by far the larger proportion, and it is a very curious body, when we come to examine it; it is remarkably curious, and yet you say, perhaps, that it is very uninteresting. it is uninteresting in some respects because of this--that it shews no brilliant effects of combustion. if i test it with a taper as i do oxygen and hydrogen, it does not burn like hydrogen, nor does it make the taper burn like oxygen. try it in any way i will, it does neither the one thing nor the other: it will not take fire; it will not let the taper burn; it puts out the combustion of everything. there is nothing that will burn in it in common circumstances. it has no smell; it is not sour; it does not dissolve in water; it is neither an acid nor an alkali; it is as indifferent to all our organs as it is possible for a thing to be. and you might say, "it is nothing; it is not worth chemical attention; what does it do in the air?" ah! then come our beautiful and fine results shewn us by an observant philosophy. suppose, in place of having nitrogen, or nitrogen and oxygen, we had pure oxygen as our atmosphere; what would become of us? you know very well that a piece of iron lit in a jar of oxygen goes on burning to the end. when you see a fire in an iron grate, imagine where the grate would go to if the whole of the atmosphere were oxygen. the grate would burn up more powerfully than the coals--for the iron of the grate itself is even more combustible than the coals which we burn in it. a fire put into the middle of a locomotive would be a fire in a magazine of fuel, if the atmosphere were oxygen. the nitrogen lowers it down and makes it moderate and useful for us, and then, with all that, it takes away with it the fumes that you have seen produced from the candle, disperses them throughout the whole of the atmosphere, and carries them away to places where they are wanted to perform a great and glorious purpose of good to man, for the sustenance of vegetation; and thus does a most wonderful work, although you say, on examining it, "why, it is a perfectly indifferent thing." this nitrogen in its ordinary state is an inactive element; no action short of the most intense electric force, and then in the most infinitely small degree, can cause the nitrogen to combine directly with the other element of the atmosphere, or with other things round about it; it is a perfectly indifferent, and therefore to say, a safe substance. but before i take you to that result, i must tell you about the atmosphere itself. i have written on this diagram the composition of one hundred parts of atmospheric air:-- bulk. weight. oxygen, . . . . . . nitrogen, . . . . . ---- ----- l . it is a true analysis of the atmosphere, so far as regards the quantity of oxygen and the quantity of nitrogen present. by our analysis, we find that pints of the atmosphere contain only pint of oxygen, and pints, or parts, of nitrogen by bulk. that is our analysis of the atmosphere. it requires all that quantity of nitrogen to reduce the oxygen down, so as to be able to supply the candle properly with fuel, so as to supply us with an atmosphere which our lungs can healthily and safely breathe; for it is just as important to make the oxygen right for us to breathe, as it is to make the atmosphere right for the burning of the fire and the candle. but now for this atmosphere. first of all, let me tell you the weight of these gases. a pint of nitrogen weighs - / grains, or a cubic foot weighs - / ounce. that is the weight of the nitrogen. the oxygen is heavier: a pint of it weighs - / grains, and a cubic foot weighs - / ounce. a pint of air weighs about - / grains, and a cubic foot - / ounce. [illustration: fig. .] you have asked me several times, and i am very glad you have, "how do you weigh gases?" i will shew you; it is very simple, and easily done. here is a balance, and here a copper bottle, made as light as we can consistent with due strength, turned very nicely in the lathe, and made perfectly air-tight, with a stop-cock, which we can open and shut, which at present is open, and therefore allows the bottle to be full of air. i have here a nicely-adjusted balance, in which i think the bottle, in its present condition, will be balanced by the weight on the other side. and here is a pump by which we can force the air into this bottle, and with it we will force in a certain number of volumes of air, as measured by the pump. [twenty measures were pumped in.] we will shut that in and put it in the balance. see how it sinks: it is much heavier than it was. by what? by the air that we have forced into it by the pump. there is not a greater _bulk_ of air, but there is the same bulk of _heavier_ air, because we have forced in air upon it. and that you may have a fair notion in your mind as to how much this air measures, here is a jar full of water. we will open that copper vessel into this jar, and let the air return to its former state. all i have to do now is to screw them tightly together, and to turn the taps, when there, you see, is the bulk of the twenty pumps of air which i forced into the bottle; and to make sure that we have been quite correct in what we have been doing, we will take the bottle again to the balance, and, if it is now counterpoised by the original weight, we shall be quite sure we have made our experiment correctly. [illustration: fig. .] it is balanced; so, you see, we can find out the weight of the extra volumes of air forced in, in that way, and by that means we are able to ascertain that a cubic foot of air weighs - / ounce. but that small experiment will by no means convey to your mind the whole literal truth of this matter. it is wonderful how it accumulates when you come to larger volumes. this bulk of air [a cubic foot] weighs - / ounce. what do you think of the contents of that box above there, which i have had made for the purpose? the air which is within that box weighs one pound--a full pound; and i have calculated the weight of the air in this room,--you would hardly imagine it, but it is above a ton. so rapidly do the weights rise up, and so important is the presence of the atmosphere, and of the oxygen and the nitrogen in it, and the use it performs in conveying things to and fro from place to place, and carrying bad vapours to places where they will do good instead of harm. having given you that little illustration with respect to the weight of the air, let me shew you certain consequences of it. you have a right to them, because you would not understand so much without it. do you remember this kind of experiment? have you ever seen it? suppose i take a pump somewhat similar to the one i had a little while ago to force air into the bottle, and suppose i place it in such a manner that by certain arrangements i can apply my hand to it: my hand moves about in the air so easily that it seems to feel nothing, and i can hardly get velocity enough by any motion of my own in the atmosphere to make sure that there is much resistance to it. [illustration: fig. .] but, when i put my hand here [on the air-pump receiver, which was afterwards exhausted], you see what happens. why is my hand fastened to this place, and why am i able to pull this pump about? and see! how is it that i can hardly get my hand away? why is this? it is the weight of the air--the weight of the air that is above. i have another experiment here, which i think will explain to you more about it. when the air is pumped from underneath the bladder which is stretched over this glass, you will see the effect in another shape: the top is quite flat at present, but i will make a very little motion with the pump, and now look at it--see how it has gone down, see how it is bent in. you will see the bladder go in more and more, until at last i expect it will be driven in and broken by the force of the atmosphere pressing upon it. [illustration: fig. .] [the bladder at last broke with a loud report.] now, that was done entirely by the weight of the air pressing on it, and you can easily understand how that is. the particles that are piled up in the atmosphere stand upon each other, as these five cubes do. you can easily conceive that four of these five cubes are resting upon the bottom one, and if i take that away, the others will all sink down. so it is with the atmosphere: the air that is above is sustained by the air that is beneath; and when the air is pumped away from beneath them, the change occurs which you saw when i placed my hand on the air-pump, and which you saw in the case of the bladder, and which you shall see better here. i have tied over this jar a piece of sheet india-rubber, and i am now about to take away the air from the inside of the jar; and if you will watch the india-rubber--which acts as a partition between the air below and the air above--you will see, when i pump, how the pressure shews itself. see where it is going to--i can actually put my hand into the jar; and yet this result is only caused by the great and powerful action of the air above. how beautifully it shews this curious circumstance! here is something that you can have a pull at, when i have finished to-day. it is a little apparatus of two hollow brass hemispheres, closely fitted together, and having connected with it a pipe and a cock, through which we can exhaust the air from the inside; and although the two halves are so easily taken apart, while the air is left within, yet you will see, when we exhaust it by-and-by, no power of any two of you will be able to pull them apart. every square inch of surface that is contained in the area of that vessel sustains fifteen pounds by weight, or nearly so, when the air is taken out; and you may try your strength presently in seeing whether you can overcome that pressure of the atmosphere. here is another very pretty thing--the boys' sucker, only refined by the philosopher. we young ones have a perfect right to take toys, and make them into philosophy, inasmuch as now-a-days we are turning philosophy into toys. here is a sucker, only it is made of india-rubber: if i clap it upon the table, you see at once it holds. why does it hold? i can slip it about, and yet if i try to pull it up, it seems as if it would pull the table with it i can easily make it slip about from place to place; but only when i bring it to the edge of the table can i get it off. it is only kept down by the pressure of the atmosphere above. we have a couple of them; and if you take these two and press them together, you will see how firmly they stick. and, indeed, we may use them as they are proposed to be used, to stick against windows, or against walls, where they will adhere for an evening, and serve to hang anything on that you want. i think, however, that you boys ought to be shewn experiments that you can make at home; and so here is a very pretty experiment in illustration of the pressure of the atmosphere. here is a tumbler of water. suppose i were to ask you to turn that tumbler upside-down, so that the water should not fall out, and yet not be kept in by your hand, but merely by using the pressure of the atmosphere. could you do that? take a wine-glass, either quite full or half-full of water, and put a flat card on the top, turn it upside-down, and then see what becomes of the card and of the water. the air cannot get in because the water by its capillary attraction round the edge keeps it out. i think this will give you a correct notion of what you may call the materiality of the air; and when i tell you that the box holds a pound of it, and this room more than a ton, you will begin to think that air is something very serious. i will make another experiment, to convince you of this positive resistance. there is that beautiful experiment of the popgun, made so well and so easily, you know, out of a quill, or a tube, or anything of that kind,--where we take a slice of potato, for instance, or an apple, and take the tube and cut out a pellet, as i have now done, and push it to one end. i have made that end tight; and now i take another piece and put it in: it will confine the air that is within the tube perfectly and completely for our purpose; and i shall now find it absolutely impossible by any force of mine to drive that little pellet close up to the other. it cannot be done. i may press the air to a certain extent, but if i go on pressing, long before it comes to the second, the confined air will drive the front one out with a force something like that of gunpowder; for gunpowder is in part dependent upon the same action that you see here exemplified. i saw the other day an experiment which pleased me much, as i thought it would serve our purpose here. (i ought to have held my tongue for four or five minutes before beginning this experiment, because it depends upon my lungs for success.) by the proper application of air i expect to be able to drive this egg out of one cup into the other by the force of my breath; but if i fail, it is in a good cause; and i do not promise success, because i have been talking more than i ought to do to make the experiment succeed. [the lecturer here tried the experiment, and succeeded in blowing the egg from one egg-cup to the other.] you see that the air which i blow goes downwards between the egg and the cup, and makes a blast under the egg, and is thus able to lift a heavy thing--for a full egg is a very heavy thing for air to lift. if you want to make the experiment, you had better boil the egg quite hard first, and then you may very safely try to blow it from one cup to the other, with a little care. i have now kept you long enough upon this property of the weight of the air, but there is another thing i should like to mention. you saw the way in which, in this popgun, i was able to drive the second piece of potato half or two-thirds of an inch before the first piece started, by virtue of the elasticity of the air--just as i pressed into the copper bottle the particles of air by means of the pump. now, this depends upon a wonderful property in the air, namely, its elasticity; and i should like to give you a good illustration of this. if i take anything that confines the air properly, as this membrane, which also is able to contract and expand so as to give us a measure of the elasticity of the air, and confine in this bladder a certain portion of air; and then, if we take the atmosphere off from the outside of it, just as in these cases we put the pressure on--if we take the pressure off, you will see how it will then go on expanding and expanding, larger and larger, until it will fill the whole of this bell-jar, shewing you that wonderful property of the air, its elasticity, its compressibility, and expansibility, to an exceedingly large extent, and which is very essential for the purposes and services it performs in the economy of creation. we will now turn to another very important part of our subject, remembering that we have examined the candle in its burning, and have found that it gives rise to various products. we have the products, you know, of soot, of water, and of something else which you have not yet examined. we have collected the water, but have allowed the other things to go into the air. let us now examine some of these other products. here is an experiment which i think will help you in part in this way. we will put our candle there, and place over it a chimney, thus. i think my candle will go on burning, because the air-passage is open at the bottom and the top. in the first place, you see the moisture appearing--that you know about. it is water produced from the candle by the action of the air upon its hydrogen. but, besides that, something is going out at the top: it is not moisture--it is not water--it is not condensible; and yet, after all, it has very singular properties. you will find that the air coming out of the top of our chimney is nearly sufficient to blow the light out i am holding to it; and if i put the light fairly opposed to the current, it will blow it quite out. you will say that is as it should be; and i am supposing that you think it ought to do so, because the nitrogen does not support combustion, and ought to put the candle out, since the candle will not burn in nitrogen. [illustration: fig. .] but is there nothing else there than nitrogen? i must now anticipate--that is to say, i must use my own knowledge to supply you with the means that we adopt for the purpose of ascertaining these things, and examining such gases as these. i will take an empty bottle--here is one--and if i hold it over this chimney, i shall get the combustion of the candle below sending its results into the bottle above; and we shall soon find that this bottle contains, not merely an air that is bad as regards the combustion of a taper put into it, but having other properties. let me take a little quick-lime and pour some common water on to it--the commonest water will do. i will stir it a moment, then pour it upon a piece of filtering paper in a funnel, and we shall very quickly have a clear water proceeding to the bottle below, as i have here. i have plenty of this water in another bottle; but, nevertheless, i should like to use the lime-water that was prepared before you, so that you may see what its uses are. if i take some of this beautiful clear lime-water, and pour it into this jar, which has collected the air from the candle, you will see a change coming about. do you see that the water has become quite milky? observe, that will not happen with air merely. here is a bottle filled with air; and if i put a little lime-water into it, neither the oxygen nor the nitrogen, nor anything else that is in that quantity of air, will make any change in the lime-water. it remains perfectly clear, and no shaking of that quantity of lime-water with that quantity of air in its common state will cause any change; but if i take this bottle with the lime-water, and hold it so as to get the general products of the candle in contact with it, in a very short time we shall have it milky. there is the chalk, consisting of the lime which we used in making the lime-water, combined with something that came from the candle--that other product which we are in search of, and which i want to tell you about to-day. this is a substance made visible to us by its action, which is not the action of the lime-water either upon the oxygen or upon the nitrogen, nor upon the water itself, but it is something new to us from the candle. and then we find this white powder, produced by the lime-water and the vapour from the candle, appears to us very much like whitening or chalk, and, when examined, it does prove to be exactly the same substance as whitening or chalk. so we are led, or have been led, to observe upon the various circumstances of this experiment, and to trace this production of chalk to its various causes, to give us the true knowledge of the nature of this combustion of the candle--to find that this substance, issuing from the candle, is exactly the same as that substance which would issue from a retort, if i were to put some chalk into it with a little moisture, and make it red-hot: you would then find that exactly the same substance would issue from it as from the candle. but we have a better means of getting this substance, and in greater quantity, so as to ascertain what its general characters are. we find this substance in very great abundance in a multitude of cases where you would least expect it. all limestones contain a great deal of this gas which issues from the candle, and which we call _carbonic acid_. all chalks, all shells, all corals contain a great quantity of this curious air. we find it fixed in these stones; for which reason dr. black called it "fixed air"--finding it in these fixed things like marble and chalk. he called it fixed air, because it lost its quality of air, and assumed the condition of a solid body. we can easily get this air from marble. here is a jar containing a little muriatic acid, and here is a taper which, if i put it into that jar, will shew only the presence of common air. there is, you see, pure air down to the bottom; the jar is full of it here is a substance--marble[ ], a very beautiful and superior marble--and if i put these pieces of marble into the jar, a great boiling apparently goes on. that, however, is not steam--it is a gas that is rising up; and if i now search the jar by a candle, i shall have exactly the same effect produced upon the taper as i had from the air which issued from the end of the chimney over the burning candle. it is exactly the same action, and caused by the very same substance that issued from the candle; and in this way we can get carbonic acid in great abundance--we have already nearly filled the jar. we also find that this gas is not merely contained in marble. here is a vessel in which i have put some common whitening--chalk, which has been washed in water and deprived of its coarser particles, and so supplied to the plasterer as whitening. here is a large jar containing this whitening and water, and i have here some strong sulphuric acid, which is the acid you might have to use if you were to make these experiments (only, in using this acid with limestone, the body that is produced is an insoluble substance, whereas the muriatic acid produces a soluble substance that does not so much thicken the water). and you will seek out a reason why i take this kind of apparatus for the purpose of shewing this experiment. i do it because you may repeat in a small way what i am about to do in a large one. you will have here just the same kind of action; and i am evolving in this large jar carbonic acid, exactly the same in its nature and properties as the gas which we obtained from the combustion of the candle in the atmosphere. and no matter how different the two methods by which we prepare this carbonic acid, you will see, when we get to the end of our subject, that it is all exactly the same, whether prepared in the one way or in the other. we will now proceed to the next experiment with regard to this gas. what is its nature? here is one of the vessels full, and we will try it, as we have done so many other gases, by combustion. you see it is not combustible, nor does it support combustion. neither, as we know, does it dissolve much in water, because we collect it over water very easily. then, you know that it has an effect, and becomes white in contact with lime-water; and when it does become white in that way, it becomes one of the constituents to make carbonate of lime or limestone. the next thing i must shew you is, that it really does dissolve a little in water, and therefore that it is unlike oxygen and hydrogen in that respect i have here an apparatus by which we can produce this solution. in the lower part of this apparatus is marble and acid, and in the upper part cold water. the valves are so arranged that the gas can get from one to the other. i will set it in action now, and you can see the gas bubbling up through the water, as it has been doing all night long, and by this time we shall find that we have this substance dissolved in the water. if i take a glass and draw off some of the water, i find that it tastes a little acid to the mouth: it is impregnated with carbonic acid; and if i now apply a little lime-water to it, that will give us a test of its presence. this water will make the lime-water turbid and white, which is proof of the presence of carbonic acid. then it is a very weighty gas--it is heavier than the atmosphere. i have put their respective weights at the lower part of this table, along with, for comparison, the weights of the other gases we have been examining:-- pint. cubic foot. hydrogen, . . . . / grains. / ounce. oxygen, . . . . - / " - / " nitrogen, . . . . - / " - / " air,. . . . . . - / " - / " carbonic acid, . . - / " - / " a pint of it weighs - / grains, and a cubic foot weighs - / ounce, almost two ounces. you can see by many experiments that this is a heavy gas. suppose i take a glass containing nothing else but air, and from this vessel containing the carbonic acid i attempt to pour a little of this gas into that glass; i wonder whether any has gone in or not. i cannot tell by the appearance, but i can in this way [introducing the taper]. yes, there it is, you see; and if i were to examine it by lime-water, i should find it by that test also. i will take this little bucket, and put it down into the well of carbonic acid--indeed, we too often have real wells of carbonic acid--and now, if there is any carbonic acid, i must have got to it by this time, and it will be in this bucket, which we will examine with a taper. there it is, you see; it is full of carbonic acid. [illustration: fig. .] there is another experiment by which i will shew you its weight. i have here a jar suspended at one end of a balance--it is now equipoised; but when i pour this carbonic acid into the jar on the one side which now contains air, you will see it sink down at once, because of the carbonic acid that i pour into it. and now, if i examine this jar with the lighted taper, i shall find that the carbonic acid has fallen into it, and it no longer has any power of supporting the combustion. if i blow a soap-bubble, which of course will be filled with air, and let it fall into this jar of carbonic acid, it will float. [illustration: fig. .] but i shall first of all take one of these little balloons filled with air. i am not quite sure where the carbonic acid is; we will just try the depth, and see whereabouts is its level. there, you see, we have this bladder floating on the carbonic acid; and if i evolve some more of the carbonic acid, the bladder will be lifted up higher. there it goes--the jar is nearly full; and now i will see whether i can blow a soap-bubble on that, and float it in the same way. [the lecturer here blew a soap-bubble, and allowed it to fall into the jar of carbonic acid, when it floated in it midway.] it is floating, as the balloon floated, by virtue of the greater weight of the carbonic acid than of the air. and now, having so far given you the history of the carbonic acid--as to its sources in the candle, as to its physical properties and weight--when we next meet i shall shew you of what it is composed, and where it gets its elements from. lecture vi. carbon or charcoal--coal gas--respiration and its analogy to the burning of a candle--conclusion. a lady, who honours me by her presence at these lectures, has conferred a still further obligation by sending me these two candles, which are from japan, and, i presume, are made of that substance to which i referred in a former lecture. you see that they are even far more highly ornamented than the french candles; and, i suppose, are candles of luxury, judging from their appearance. they have a remarkable peculiarity about them--namely, a hollow wick,--that beautiful peculiarity which argand introduced into the lamp, and made so valuable. to those who receive such presents from the east, i may just say that this and such like materials gradually undergo a change which gives them on the surface a dull and dead appearance; but they may easily be restored to their original beauty, if the surface be rubbed with a clean cloth or silk handkerchief, so as to polish the little rugosity or roughness: this will restore the beauty of the colours. i have so rubbed one of these candles, and you see the difference between it and the other which has not been polished, but which may be restored by the same process. observe, also, that these moulded candles from japan are made more conical than the moulded candles in this part of the world. i told you, when we last met, a good deal about carbonic acid. we found, by the lime-water test, that when the vapour from the top of the candle or lamp was received into bottles, and tested by this solution of lime-water (the composition of which i explained to you, and which you can make for yourselves), we had that white opacity which was in fact calcareous matter, like shells and corals, and many of the rocks and minerals in the earth. but i have not yet told you fully and clearly the chemical history of this substance--carbonic acid--as we have it from the candle, and i must now resume that subject. we have seen the products, and the nature of them, as they issue from the candle. we have traced the water to its elements, and now we have to see where are the elements of the carbonic acid supplied by the candle. a few experiments will shew this. you remember that when a candle burns badly, it produces smoke; but if it is burning well, there is no smoke. and you know that the brightness of the candle is due to this smoke, which becomes ignited. here is an experiment to prove this: so long as the smoke remains in the flame of the candle and becomes ignited, it gives a beautiful light, and never appears to us in the form of black particles. i will light some fuel, which is extravagant in its burning. this will serve our purpose--a little turpentine on a sponge. you see the smoke rising from it, and floating into the air in large quantities; and, remember now, the carbonic acid that we have from the candle is from such smoke as that. to make that evident to you, i will introduce this turpentine burning on the sponge into a flask where i have plenty of oxygen, the rich part of the atmosphere, and you now see that the smoke is all consumed. this is the first part of our experiment; and now, what follows? the carbon which you saw flying off from the turpentine flame in the air is now entirely burned in this oxygen, and we shall find that it will, by this rough and temporary experiment, give us exactly the same conclusion and result as we had from the combustion of the candle. the reason why i make the experiment in this manner is solely that i may cause the steps of our demonstration to be so simple that you can never for a moment lose the train of reasoning, if you only pay attention. all the carbon which is burned in oxygen, or air, comes out as carbonic acid, whilst those particles which are not so burned shew you the second substance in the carbonic acid--namely, the carbon--that body which made the flame so bright whilst there was plenty of air, but which was thrown off in excess when there was not oxygen enough to burn it. i have also to shew you a little more distinctly the history of carbon and oxygen, in their union to make carbonic acid. you are now better able to understand this than before, and i have prepared three or four experiments by way of illustration. this jar is filled with oxygen, and here is some carbon which has been placed in a crucible, for the purpose of being made red-hot. i keep my jar dry, and venture to give you a result imperfect in some degree, in order that i may make the experiment brighter. i am about to put the oxygen and the carbon together. that this is carbon (common charcoal pulverised), you will see by the way in which it burns in the air [letting some of the red-hot charcoal fall out of the crucible]. i am now about to burn it in oxygen gas, and look at the difference. it may appear to you at a distance as if it were burning with a flame; but it is not so. every little piece of charcoal is burning as a spark, and whilst it so burns it is producing carbonic acid. i specially want these two or three experiments to point out what i shall dwell upon more distinctly by-and-by--that carbon burns in this way, and not as a flame. instead of taking many particles of carbon to burn, i will take a rather large piece, which will enable you to see the form and size; and to trace the effects very decidedly. here is the jar of oxygen, and here is the piece of charcoal, to which i have fastened a little piece of wood, which i can set fire to, and so commence the combustion, which i could not conveniently do without. you now see the charcoal burning, but not as a flame (or if there be a flame, it is the smallest possible one, which i know the cause of--namely, the formation of a little carbonic oxide close upon the surface of the carbon). it goes on burning, you see, slowly producing carbonic acid by the union of this carbon or charcoal (they are equivalent terms) with the oxygen. i have here another piece of charcoal, a piece of bark, which has the quality of being blown to pieces--exploding as it burns. by the effect of the heat, we shall reduce the lump of carbon into particles that will fly off; still every particle, equally with the whole mass, burns in this peculiar way: it burns as a coal, and not like a flame. you observe a multitude of little combustions going on, but no flame. i do not know a finer experiment than this, to shew that carbon burns with a spark. here, then, is carbonic acid formed from its elements. it is produced at once; and if we examined it by lime-water, you will see that we have the same substance which i have previously described to you. by putting together parts of carbon by weight (whether it comes from the flame of a candle or from powdered charcoal) and parts of oxygen by weight, we have parts of carbonic acid; and, as we saw last time, the parts of carbonic acid, combined with parts of lime, produced common carbonate of lime. if you were to examine an oyster-shell, and weigh the component parts, you would find that every parts would give of carbon and of oxygen, combined with of lime. however, i do not want to trouble you with these minuti¾--it is only the general philosophy of the matter that we can now go into. see how finely the carbon is dissolving away [pointing to the lump of charcoal burning quietly in the jar of oxygen]. you may say that the charcoal is actually dissolving in the air round about; and if that were perfectly pure charcoal, which we can easily prepare, there would be no residue whatever. when we have a perfectly cleansed and purified piece of carbon, there is no ash left. the carbon burns as a solid dense body, that heat alone cannot change as to its solidity, and yet it passes away into vapour that never condenses into solid or liquid under ordinary circumstances; and what is more curious still, is the fact that the oxygen does not change in its bulk by the solution of the carbon in it. just as the bulk is at first, so it is at last, only it has become carbonic acid. there is another experiment which i must give you before you are fully acquainted with the general nature of carbonic acid. being a compound body, consisting of carbon and oxygen, carbonic acid is a body that we ought to be able to take asunder. and so we can. as we did with water, so we can with carbonic acid--take the two parts asunder. the simplest and quickest way is to act upon the carbonic acid by a substance that can attract the oxygen from it, and leave the carbon behind. you recollect that i took potassium and put it upon water or ice, and you saw that it could take the oxygen from the hydrogen. now, suppose we do something of the same kind here with this carbonic acid. you know carbonic acid to be a heavy gas. i will not test it with lime-water, as that will interfere with our subsequent experiments; but i think the heaviness of the gas and the power of extinguishing flame will be sufficient for our purpose. i introduce a flame into the gas, and you will see whether it will be put out. you see the light is extinguished. indeed, the gas may, perhaps, put out phosphorus, which, you know, has a pretty strong combustion. here is a piece of phosphorus heated to a high degree. i introduce it into gas, and you observe the light is put out; but it will take fire again in the air, because there it re-enters into combustion. now, let me take a piece of potassium, a substance which, even at common temperatures, can act upon carbonic acid, though not sufficiently for our present purpose, because it soon gets covered with a protecting coat; but if we warm it up to the burning point in air, as we have a fair right to do, and as we have done with phosphorus, you will see that it can burn in carbonic acid; and if it burns, it will burn by taking oxygen, so that you will see what is left behind. i am going, then, to burn this potassium in the carbonic acid, as a proof of the existence of oxygen in the carbonic acid. [in the preliminary process of heating, the potassium exploded.] sometimes we get an awkward piece of potassium that explodes, or something like it, when it burns. i will take another piece; and now that it is heated, i introduce it into the jar, and you perceive that it burns in the carbonic acid--not so well as in the air, because the carbonic acid contains the oxygen combined; but it does burn, and takes away the oxygen. if i now put this potassium into water, i find that, besides the potash formed (which you need not trouble about), there is a quantity of carbon produced. i have here made the experiment in a very rough way; but i assure you that if i were to make it carefully, devoting a day to it, instead of five minutes, we should get all the proper amount of charcoal left in the spoon, or in the place where the potassium was burned, so that there could be no doubt as to the result. here, then, is the carbon obtained from the carbonic acid, as a common black substance; so that you have the entire proof of the nature of carbonic acid as consisting of carbon and oxygen. and now, i may tell you, that _whenever_ carbon burns under common circumstances, it produces carbonic acid. suppose i take this piece of wood, and put it into a bottle with lime-water. i might shake that lime-water up with wood and the atmosphere as long as i pleased, it would still remain clear as you see it; but suppose i burn the piece of wood in the air of that bottle. you, of course, know i get water. do i get carbonic acid? [the experiment was performed.] there it is, you see--that is to say, the carbonate lime, which results from carbonic acid, and that carbonic acid must be formed from the carbon which comes from the wood, from the candle, or any other thing. indeed, you have yourselves frequently tried a very pretty experiment, by which you may see the carbon in wood. if you take a piece of wood, and partly burn it, and then blow it out, you have carbon left. there are things that do not shew carbon in this way. a candle does not shew it, but it contains carbon. here also is a jar of coal-gas, which produces carbonic acid abundantly. you do not see the carbon, but we can soon shew it to you. i will light it, and as long as there is any gas in this cylinder it will go on burning. you see no carbon, but you see a flame; and because that is bright, it will lead you to guess that there is carbon in the flame. but i will shew it to you by another process. i have some of the same gas in another vessel, mixed with a body that will burn the hydrogen of the gas, but will not burn the carbon. i will light them with a burning taper, and you perceive the hydrogen is consumed, but not the carbon, which is left behind as a dense black smoke. i hope that by these three or four experiments you will learn to see when carbon is present, and understand what are the products of combustion, when gas or other bodies are thoroughly burned in the air. before we leave the subject of carbon, let us make a few experiments and remarks upon its wonderful condition as respects ordinary combustion. i have shewn you that the carbon in burning burns only as a solid body, and yet you perceive that, after it is burned, it ceases to be a solid. there are very few fuels that act like this. it is, in fact, only that great source of fuel, the carbonaceous series, the coals, charcoals, and woods, that can do it. i do not know that there is any other elementary substance besides carbon that burns with these conditions; and if it had not been so, what would happen to us? suppose all fuel had been like iron, which, when it burns, burns into a solid substance. we could not then have such a combustion as you have in this fire-place. here also is another kind of fuel which burns very well--as well as, if not better, than carbon--so well, indeed, as to take fire of itself when it is in the air, as you see [breaking a tube full of lead pyrophorus]. this substance is lead, and you see how wonderfully combustible it is. it is very much divided, and is like a heap of coals in the fireplace; the air can get to its surface and inside, and so it burns. but why does it not burn in that way now, when it is lying in a mass? [emptying the contents of the tube in a heap on to a plate of iron]. simply because the air cannot get to it. though it can produce a great heat, the great heat which we want in our furnaces and under our boilers, still that which is produced cannot get away from the portion which remains unburned underneath, and that portion, therefore, is prevented from coming in contact with the atmosphere, and cannot be consumed. how different is that from carbon. carbon burns just in the same way as this lead does, and so gives an intense fire in the furnace, or wherever you choose to burn it; but then the body produced by its combustion passes away, and the remaining carbon is left clear. i shewed you how carbon went on dissolving in the oxygen, leaving no ash; whereas here [pointing to the heap of pyrophorus] we have actually more ash than fuel, for it is heavier by the amount of the oxygen which has united with it. thus you see the difference between carbon and lead or iron: if we choose iron, which gives so wonderful a result in our application of this fuel, either as light or heat. if, when the carbon burnt, the product went off as a solid body, you would have had the room filled with an opaque substance, as in the case of the phosphorus; but when carbon burns, everything passes up into the atmosphere. it is in a fixed, almost unchangeable condition before the combustion; but afterwards it is in the form of gas, which it is very difficult (though we have succeeded) to produce in a solid or a liquid state. now, i must take you to a very interesting part of our subject--to the relation between the combustion of a candle and that living kind of combustion which goes on within us. in every one of us there is a living process of combustion going on very similar to that of a candle; and i must try to make that plain to you. for it is not merely true in a poetical sense--the relation of the life of man to a taper; and if you will follow, i think i can make this clear. in order to make the relation very plain, i have devised a little apparatus which we can soon build up before you. here is a board and a groove cut in it, and i can close the groove at the top part by a little cover. i can then continue the groove as a channel by a glass tube at each end, there being a free passage through the whole. suppose i take a taper or candle (we can now be liberal in our use of the word "candle," since we understand what it means), and place it in one of the tubes; it will go on, you see, burning very well. you observe that the air which feeds the flame passes down the tube at one end, then goes along the horizontal tube, and ascends the tube at the other end in which the taper is placed. [illustration: fig. ] if i stop the aperture through which the air enters, i stop combustion, as you perceive. i stop the supply of air, and consequently the candle goes out. but, now, what will you think of this fact? in a former experiment i shewed you the air going from one burning candle to a second candle. if i took the air proceeding from another candle, and sent it down by a complicated arrangement into this tube, i should put this burning candle out. but what will you say when i tell you that my breath will put out that candle? i do not mean by blowing at all, but simply that the nature of my breath is such that a candle cannot burn in it. i will now hold my mouth over the aperture, and without blowing the flame in any way, let no air enter the tube but what comes from my mouth. you see the result. i did not blow the candle out. i merely let the air which i expired pass into the aperture, and the result was that the light went out for want of oxygen, and for no other reason. something or other--namely, my lungs--had taken away the oxygen from the air, and there was no more to supply the combustion of the candle. it is, i think, very pretty to see the time it takes before the bad air which i throw into this part of the apparatus has reached the candle. the candle at first goes on burning, but so soon as the air has had time to reach it, it goes out. and, now, i will shew you another experiment, because this is an important part of our philosophy. here is a jar which contains fresh air, as you can see by the circumstance of a candle or gas-light burning it. i make it close for a little time, and by means of a pipe i get my mouth over it so that i can inhale the air. by putting it over water, in the way that you see, i am able to draw up this air (supposing the cork to be quite tight), take it into my lungs, and throw it back into the jar. [illustration: fig. .] we can then examine it, and see the result. you observe, i first take up the air, and then throw it back, as is evident from the ascent and descent of the water; and now, by putting a taper into the air, you will see the state in which it is, by the light being extinguished. even one inspiration, you see, has completely spoiled this air, so that it is no use my trying to breathe it a second time. now, you understand the ground of the impropriety of many of the arrangements among the houses of the poorer classes, by which the air is breathed over and over again, for the want of a supply, by means of proper ventilation, sufficient to produce a good result. you see how bad the air becomes by a single breathing; so that you can easily understand how essential fresh air is to us. to pursue this a little further, let us see what will happen with lime-water. here is a globe which contains a little lime-water, and it is so arranged as regards the pipes, as to give access to the air within, so that we can ascertain the effect of respired or unrespired air upon it. of course, i can either draw in air (through a), and so make the air that feeds my lungs go through the lime-water, or i can force the air out of my lungs through the tube (b), which goes to the bottom, and so shew its effect upon the lime-water. [illustration: fig. .] you will observe that, however long i draw the external air into the lime-water, and then through it to my lungs, i shall produce no effect upon the water--it will not make the lime-water turbid; but if i throw the air _from_ my lungs through the lime-water, several times in succession, you see how white and milky the water is getting, shewing the effect which expired air has had upon it; and now you begin to know that the atmosphere which we have spoiled by respiration is spoiled by carbonic acid, for you see it here in contact with the lime-water. i have here two bottles, one containing lime-water and the other common water, and tubes which pass into the bottles and connect them. the apparatus is very rough, but it is useful notwithstanding. [illustration: fig. .] if i take these two bottles, inhaling here and exhaling there, the arrangement of the tubes will prevent the air going backwards. the air coming in will go to my mouth and lungs, and in going out, will pass through the lime-water, so that i can go on breathing and making an experiment, very refined in its nature, and very good in its results. you will observe that the good air has done nothing to the lime-water; in the other case nothing has come to the lime-water but my respiration, and you see the difference in the two cases. let us now go a little further. what is all this process going on within us which we cannot do without, either day or night, which is so provided for by the author of all things that he has arranged that it shall be independent of all will? if we restrain our respiration, as we can to a certain extent, we should destroy ourselves. when we are asleep, the organs of respiration, and the parts that are associated with them, still go on with their action--so necessary is this process of respiration to us, this contact of the air with the lungs. i must tell you, in the briefest possible manner, what this process is. we consume food: the food goes through that strange set of vessels and organs within us, and is brought into various parts of the system, into the digestive parts especially; and alternately the portion which is so changed is carried through our lungs by one set of vessels, while the air that we inhale and exhale is drawn into and thrown out of the lungs by another set of vessels, so that the air and the food come close together, separated only by an exceedingly thin surface: the air can thus act upon the blood by this process, producing precisely the same results in kind as we have seen in the case of the candle. the candle combines with parts of the air, forming carbonic acid, and evolves heat; so in the lungs there is this curious, wonderful change taking place. the air entering, combines with the carbon (not carbon in a free state, but, as in this case, placed ready for action at the moment), and makes carbonic acid, and is so thrown out into the atmosphere, and thus this singular result takes place: we may thus look upon the food as fuel. let me take that piece of sugar, which will serve my purpose. it is a compound of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, similar to a candle, as containing the same elements, though not in the same proportion--the proportions being as shewn in this table:-- sugar. carbon, . . . . _ hydrogen, . . . | | oxygen, . . . . _| this is, indeed, a very curious thing, which you can well remember, for the oxygen and hydrogen are in exactly the proportions which form water, so that sugar may be said to be compounded of parts of carbon and parts of water; and it is the carbon in the sugar that combines with the oxygen carried in by the air in the process of respiration--so making us like candles--producing these actions, warmth, and far more wonderful results besides, for the sustenance of the system, by a most beautiful and simple process. to make this still more striking, i will take a little sugar; or, to hasten the experiment, i will use some syrup, which contains about three-fourths of sugar and a little water. if i put a little oil of vitriol on it, it takes away the water, and leaves the carbon in a black mass. [the lecturer mixed the two together.] you see how the carbon is coming out, and before long we shall have a solid mass of charcoal, all of which has come out of sugar. sugar, as you know, is food, and here we have absolutely a solid lump of carbon where you would not have expected it. and if i make arrangements so as to oxidize the carbon of sugar, we shall have a much more striking result here is sugar, and i have here an oxidizer--a quicker one than the atmosphere; and so we shall oxidize this fuel by a process different from respiration in its form, though not different in its kind. it is the combustion of the carbon by the contact of oxygen which the body has supplied to it. if i set this into action at once, you will see combustion produced. just what occurs in my lungs--taking in oxygen from another source, namely, the atmosphere--takes place here by a more rapid process. you will be astonished when i tell you what this curious play of carbon amounts to. a candle will burn some four, five, six, or seven hours. what, then, must be the daily amount of carbon going up into the air in the way of carbonic acid! what a quantity of carbon must go from each of us in respiration! what a wonderful change of carbon must take place under these circumstances of combustion or respiration! a man in twenty-four hours converts as much as seven ounces of carbon into carbonic acid; a milch cow will convert seventy ounces, and a horse seventy-nine ounces, solely by the act of respiration. that is, the horse in twenty-four hours burns seventy-nine ounces of charcoal, or carbon, in his organs of respiration, to supply his natural warmth in that time. all the warm-blooded animals get their warmth in this way, by the conversion of carbon, not in a free state, but in a state of combination. and what an extraordinary notion this gives us of the alterations going on in our atmosphere. as much as , , pounds, or tons, of carbonic acid is formed by respiration in london alone in twenty-four hours. and where does all this go? up into the air. if the carbon had been like the lead which i shewed you, or the iron which, in burning, produces a solid substance, what would happen? combustion could not go on. as charcoal burns, it becomes a vapour and passes off into the atmosphere, which is the great vehicle, the great carrier for conveying it away to other places. then, what becomes of it? wonderful is it to find that the change produced by respiration, which seems so injurious to us (for we cannot breathe air twice over), is the very life and support of plants and vegetables that grow upon the surface of the earth. it is the same also under the surface, in the great bodies of water; for fishes and other animals respire upon the same principle, though not exactly by contact with the open air. such fish as i have here [pointing to a globe of gold-fish] respire by the oxygen which is dissolved from the air by the water, and form carbonic acid; and they all move about to produce the one great work of making the animal and vegetable kingdoms subservient to each other. and all the plants growing upon the surface of the earth, like that which i have brought here to serve as an illustration, absorb carbon. these leaves are taking up their carbon from the atmosphere, to which we have given it in the form of carbonic acid, and they are growing and prospering. give them a pure air like ours, and they could not live in it; give them carbon with other matters, and they live and rejoice. this piece of wood gets all its carbon, as the trees and plants get theirs, from the atmosphere, which, as we have seen, carries away what is bad for us and at the same time good for them,--what is disease to the one being health to the other. so are we made dependent, not merely upon our fellow-creatures, but upon our fellow-existers, all nature being tied together by the laws that make one part conduce to the good of another. there is another little point which i must mention before we draw to a close--a point which concerns the whole of these operations, and most curious and beautiful it is to see it clustering upon and associated with the bodies that concern us--oxygen, hydrogen, and carbon, in different states of their existence. i shewed you just now some powdered lead, which i set burning[ ]; and you saw that the moment the fuel was brought to the air, it acted, even before it got out of the bottle--the moment the air crept in, it acted. now, there is a case of chemical affinity by which all our operations proceed. when we breathe, the same operation is going on within us. when we burn a candle, the attraction of the different parts one to the other is going on. here it is going on in this case of the lead; and it is a beautiful instance of chemical affinity. if the products of combustion rose off from the surface, the lead would take fire, and go on burning to the end; but you remember that we have this difference between charcoal and lead--that, while the lead can start into action at once, if there be access of air to it, the carbon will remain days, weeks, months, or years. the manuscripts of herculaneum were written with carbonaceous ink, and there they have been for , years or more, not having been at all changed by the atmosphere, though coming in contact with it under various circumstances. now, what is the circumstance which makes the lead and carbon differ in this respect? it is a striking thing to see that the matter which is appointed to serve the purpose of fuel _waits_ in its action: it does not start off burning, like the lead and many other things that i could shew you; but which i have not encumbered the table with; but it waits for action. this waiting is a curious and wonderful thing. candles--those japanese candles, for instance--do not start into action at once, like the lead or iron (for iron finely divided does the same thing as lead), but there they wait for years, perhaps for ages, without undergoing any alteration. i have here a supply of coal-gas. the jet is giving forth the gas, but you see it does not take fire--it comes out into the air, but it waits till it is hot enough before it burns. if i make it hot enough, it takes fire. if i blow it out, the gas that is issuing forth waits till the light is applied to it again. it is curious to see how different substances wait--how some will wait till the temperature is raised a little, and others till it is raised a good deal. i have here a little gunpowder and some gun-cotton; even these things differ in the conditions under which they will burn. the gunpowder is composed of carbon and other substances, making it highly combustible; and the gun-cotton is another combustible preparation. they are both waiting, but they will start into activity at different degrees of heat, or under different conditions. by applying a heated wire to them, we shall see which will start first [touching the gun-cotton with the hot iron]. you see the gun-cotton has gone off, but not even the hottest part of the wire is now hot enough to fire the gunpowder. how beautifully that shews you the difference in the degree in which bodies act in this way! in the one case the substance will wait any time until the associated bodies are made active by heat; but in the other, as in the process of respiration, it waits no time. in the lungs, as soon as the air enters, it unites with the carbon; even in the lowest temperature which the body can bear short of being frozen, the action begins at once, producing the carbonic acid of respiration: and so all things go on fitly and properly. thus you see the analogy between respiration and combustion is rendered still more beautiful and striking. indeed, all i can say to you at the end of these lectures (for we must come to an end at one time or other) is to express a wish that you may, in your generation, be fit to compare to a candle; that you may, like it, shine as lights to those about you; that, in all your actions, you may justify the beauty of the taper by making your deeds honourable and effectual in the discharge of your duty to your fellow-men. lecture on platinum. [_delivered before the_ royal institution, _on friday, february , ._] whether i was to have the honour of appearing before you this evening or not, seemed to be doubtful upon one or two points. one of these i will mention immediately; the other may or may not appear during the course of the hour that follows. the first point is this. when i was tempted to promise this subject for your attention this evening, it was founded upon a promise, and a full intent of performing that promise, on the part of my friend deville, of paris, to come here to shew before you a phenomenon in metallurgic chemistry not common. in that i have been disappointed. his intention was to have fused here some thirty or forty pounds of platinum, and so to have made manifest, through my mouth and my statement, the principles of a new process in metallurgy, in relation to this beautiful, magnificent, and valuable metal; but circumstances over which neither he nor i, nor others concerned, have sufficient control, have prevented the fulfilment of that intention; and the period at which i learned the fact was so recent, that i could hardly leave my place here to be filled by another, or permit you, who in your kindness have come to hear what might be said, to remain unreceived in the best manner possible to me under the circumstances. i therefore propose to state, as well as i can, what the principles are on which m. deville proceeds, by means of drawings, and some subordinate or inferior experiments. the metal platinum, of which you see some very fine specimens on the table, has been known to us about a hundred years. it has been wrought in a beautiful way in this country, in france, and elsewhere, and supplied to the consumer in ingots of this kind, or in plates, such as we have here, or in masses, that by their very fall upon the table indicate the great weight of the substance, which is, indeed, nearly at the head of all substances in that respect. this substance has been given to us hitherto mainly through the philosophy of dr. wollaston, whom many of us know, and it is obtained in great purity and beauty. it is a very remarkable metal in many points, besides its known special uses. it usually comes to us in grains. here is a very fine specimen of native platinum in grains. here is also a nugget or ingot, and here are some small pieces gathered out of certain alluvial soils in brazil, mexico, california, and the uralian districts of russia. it is strange that this metal is almost always found associated with some four or five other metals, most curious in their qualities and characteristics. they are called platiniferous metals; and they have not only the relation of being always found associated in this manner, but they have other relations of a curious nature, which i shall point out to you by a reference to one of the tables behind me. this substance is always native--it is always in the metallic state; and the metals with which it is found connected, and which are rarely found elsewhere, are palladium, rhodium, iridium, osmium, and ruthenium. we have the names in one of the tables arranged in two columns, representing, as you see, two groups--platinum, iridium, and osmium constituting one group; and ruthenium, rhodium, and palladium the other. three of these have the chemical equivalent of - / , and the others a chemical equivalent of about half that number. then the metals of one group have an extreme specific gravity--platinum being, in fact, the lightest of the three, or as light as the lightest. osmium has a specific gravity of . , and is the heaviest body in nature; platinum is . , and iridium the same; the specific gravity of the other three being only about half that, namely, . , . , and . . then there is this curious relation, that palladium and iridium are very much alike, so that you would scarcely know one from the other, though one has only half the weight of the other, and only half the equivalent power. so with iridium and rhodium, and osmium and ruthenium, which are so closely allied that they make pairs, being separated each from its own group. then these metals are the most infusible that we possess. osmium is the most difficult to fuse: indeed, i believe it never has been fused, while every other metal has. ruthenium comes next, iridium next, rhodium next, platinum next (so that it ranks here as a pretty fusible metal, and yet we have been long accustomed to speak of the infusibility of platinum), and next comes palladium, which is the most fusible metal of the whole. it is a curious thing to see this fine association of physical properties coming out in metals which are grouped together somehow or other in nature, but, no doubt, by causes which are related to analogous properties in their situation on the surface of the earth, for it is in alluvial soils that these things are found. now, with regard to this substance, let me tell you briefly how we get it. the process used to be this. the ore which i shewed you just now was taken, and digested in nitro-muriatic acid of a certain strength, and partly converted into a solution, with the leaving behind of certain bodies that i have upon the table. the platinum being dissolved with care in acids, to the solution the muriate of ammonia was added, as i am about to add it here. a yellow precipitate was then thrown down, as you perceive is the case now; and this, carefully washed and cleansed, gave us that body [pointing to a specimen of the chloride of platinum and ammonium], the other elements, or nearly all, being ejected. this substance being heated, gave us what we call platinum sponge, or platinum in the metallic state, so finely divided as to form a kind of heavy mass or sponge, which, at the time that dr. wollaston first sent it forth, was not fusible for the market or in the manufacturers' workshops, inasmuch as the temperature required was so high, and there were no furnaces that could bring the mass into a globule, and cause the parts to adhere together. most of our metals that we obtain from nature, and work in our shops, are brought at last into a mass by fusion. i am not aware that there is in the arts or sciences any other than iron which is not so. soft iron we do not bring together by fusion, but by a process which is analogous to the one that was followed in the case of platinum, namely, welding; for these divided grains of spongy platinum having been well washed and sunk in water for the purpose of excluding air, and pressed together, and heated, and hammered, and pressed again, until they come into a pretty close, dense, compact mass, did so cohere, that when the mass was put into the furnace of charcoal, and raised to a high temperature, the particles, at first infinitely divided--for they were chemically divided--adhered the one to the other, each to all the rest, until they made that kind of substance which you see here, which will bear rolling and expansion of every kind. no other process than that has hitherto been adopted for the purpose of obtaining this substance from the particles by solution, precipitation, ignition, and welding. it certainly is a very fine thing to see that we may so fully depend upon the properties of the various substances we have to deal with; that we can, by carrying out our processes, obtain a material like this, allowing of division and extension under a rolling mill--a material of the finest possible kind, the parts being held together, not with interstices, not with porosity, but so continuous that no fluids can pass between them; and, as dr. wollaston beautifully shewed, a globule of platinum fused by the voltaic battery and the oxy-hydrogen blowpipe, when drawn into a wire, was not sounder or stronger than this wire made by the curious coalescence of the particles by the sticking power that they had at high temperatures. this is the process adopted by messrs. johnson and matthey, to whose great kindness i am indebted for these ingots and for the valuable assistance i have received in the illustrations. the treatment, however, that i have to bring before you is of another kind; and it is in the hope that we shall be able before long to have such a thing as the manufacture of platinum of this kind, that i am encouraged to come before you, and tell you how far deville has gone in the matter, and to give you illustrations of the principles on which he proceeds. i think it is but fair that you should see an experiment shewing you the way in which we get the adhesion of platinum. probably you all know of the welding of iron: you go into the smith's shop, and you see him put the handle of a poker on to the stem, and by a little management and the application of heat he makes them one. you have no doubt seen him put the iron into the fire and sprinkle a little sand upon it. he does not know the philosophy he calls into play when he sprinkles a little sand over the oxide of iron, but he has a fine philosophy there, or practises it, when he gets his welding. i can shew you here this beautiful circumstance of the sticking together of the particles up to the fullest possible intensity of their combination. if you were to go into the workshops of mr. matthey, and see them hammering and welding away, you would see the value of the experiment i am about to shew you. i have here some platinum-wire. this is a metal which resists the action of acids, resists oxidation by heat, and change of any sort; and which, therefore, i may heat in the atmosphere without any flux. i bend the wire so as to make the ends cross: these i make hot by means of the blowpipe, and then, by giving them a tap with a hammer, i shall make them into one piece. now that the pieces are united, i shall have great difficulty in pulling them apart, though they are joined only at the point where the two cylindrical surfaces came together. and now i have succeeded in pulling the wire apart, the division is not at the point of welding, but where the force of the pincers has cut it, so that the junction we have effected is a complete one. this, then, is the principle of the manufacture and production of platinum in the old way. the treatment which deville proposes to carry out, and which he has carried out to a rather large extent in reference to the russian supply of platinum, is one altogether by heat, having little or no reference to the use of acids. that you may know what the problem is, look at this table, which gives you the composition of such a piece of platinum ore as i shewed you just now. wherever it comes from, the composition is as complicated, though the proportions vary:-- platinum, . . . . . . iridium,. . . . . . . rhodium,. . . . . . . palladium,. . . . . . gold, . . . . . . . . copper, . . . . . . . iron, . . . . . . . . osmide of iridium,. . sand, . . . . . . . . ----- . this refers to the uralian ore. in that state of combination, as shewn in the table, the iridium and osmium are found combined in crystals, sometimes to the amount of . per cent., and sometimes or per cent. now, this deville proposes to deal with in the dry way, in the place of dealing with it by any acid. i have here another kind of platinum; and i shew it to you for this reason. the russian government, having large stores of platinum in their dominions, have obtained it in a metallic state, and worked it into coin. the coin i have in my hand is a twelve silver rouble piece. the rouble is worth three shillings, and this coin is, therefore, of the value of thirty-six shillings. the smaller coin is worth half that sum; and the other, half of that. the metal, however, is unfit for coinage. when you have the two metals, gold and silver, used for coinage, you have a little confusion in the value of the two in the market; but when you have three precious metals (for you may call platinum a precious metal) worked into coin, they will be sure to run counter to one another. indeed, the case did happen, that the price of platinum coin fixed by the government was such, that it was worth while to purchase platinum in other countries, and make coin of it, and then take it into that country and circulate it. the result was, that the russian government stopped the issue. the composition of this coin is--platinum, . ; iridium, . ; rhodium, . ; palladium, . ; a little copper, and a little iron. it is, in fact, bad platinum: it scales, and it has an unfitness for commercial use and in the laboratory, which the other well-purified platinum has not. it wants working over again. now, deville's process depends upon three points,--upon intense heat, blowpipe action, and the volatility of certain metals. we know that there are plenty of metals that are volatile; but this, i think, is the first time that it has been proposed to use the volatility of certain metals--such as gold and palladium--for the purpose of driving them off and leaving something else behind. he counts largely upon the volatility of metals which we have not been in the habit of considering volatile, but which we have rather looked upon as fixed; and i must endeavour to illustrate these three points by a few experiments. perhaps i can best show you what is required in the process of heating platinum by using that source of heat which we have here, and which seems to be almost illimitable--namely, the voltaic battery; for it is only in consequence of the heat that the voltaic battery affects the platinum. by applying the two extremities of the battery to this piece of platinum-wire, you will see what result we shall obtain. you perceive that we can take about this heating agent wherever we like, and deal with it as we please, limiting it in any way. i am obliged to deal carefully with it; but even that circumstance will have an interest for you in watching the experiment. contact is now made. the electric current, when compressed into thin conducting-wires offering resistance, evolves heat to a large extent; and this is the power by which we work. you see the intense glow immediately imparted to the wire; and if i applied the heat continuously, the effect of the current would be to melt the wire. as soon as the contact is broken, the wire resumes its former appearance; and now that we make contact again, you perceive the glow as before. [the experiment was repeated several times in rapid succession.] you can see a line of light, though you can scarcely perceive the wire; and now that it has melted with the great heat, if you examine it, you will perceive that it is indeed a set of irregularities from end to end--a set of little spheres, which are strung upon an axis of platinum running through it. it is that wire which mr. grove described as being produced at the moment when fusion of the whole mass is commencing. in the same manner, if i take a tolerably thick piece of platinum, and subject it to the heat that can be produced by this battery, you will see the brilliancy of the effect produced. i shall put on a pair of spectacles for the experiment, as there is an injurious effect of the voltaic spark upon the eyes, if the action is continued; and it is neither policy nor bravery to subject any organ to unnecessary danger; and i want, at all events, to keep the full use of my eyes to the end of the lecture. you now see the action of the heat upon the piece of platinum--heat so great as to break in pieces the plate on which the drops of metal fall. you perceive, then, that we have sufficiently powerful sources of heat in nature to deal with platinum. i have here an apparatus by which the same thing can be shewn. here is a piece of platinum, which is put into a crucible of carbon made at the end of one pole of the battery, and you will see the brilliant light that will be produced. there is our furnace, and the platinum is rapidly getting heated; and now you perceive that it is melted, and throwing off little particles. what a magnificent philosophical instrument this is. when you look at the result, which is lying upon the charcoal, you will see a beautifully fused piece of platinum. it is now a fiery globule, with a surface so bright, and smooth, and reflecting, that i cannot tell whether it is transparent, or opaque, or what. this, then, will give you an idea of what has to be done by any process that pretends to deal with thirty, or forty, or fifty pounds of platinum at once. let me now tell you briefly what deville proposes to do. first of all, he takes this ore, with its impurities, and mixes it (as he finds it essential and best) with its own weight of sulphuret of lead--lead combined with sulphur. both the lead and the sulphur are wanted; for the iron that is there present, as you see by the table, is one of the most annoying substances in the treatment that you can imagine, because it is not volatile; and while the iron remains adhering to the platinum, the platinum will not flow readily. it cannot be sent away by a high temperature--sent into the atmosphere so as to leave the platinum behind. well, then, a hundred parts of ore and a hundred parts of sulphuret of lead, with about fifty parts of metallic lead, being all mingled together in a crucible, the sulphur of the sulphuret takes the iron, the copper, and some of the other metals and impurities, and combines with them to form a slag; and as it goes on boiling and oxidising, it carries off the iron, and so a great cleansing takes place. now, you ought to know that these metals, such as platinum, iridium, and palladium, have a strong affinity for such metals as lead and tin, and upon this a great deal depends. very much depends upon the platinum throwing out its impurities of iron and so forth, by being taken up with the lead present in it. that you may have a notion of the great power that platinum has of combining with other metals, i will refer you to a little of the chemist's experience--his bad experience. he knows very well that if he takes a piece of platinum-foil, and heats a piece of lead upon it, or if he takes a piece of platinum-foil, such as we have here, and heats things upon it that have lead in them, his platinum is destroyed. i have here a piece of platinum, and if i apply the heat of the spirit-lamp to it, in consequence of the presence of this little piece of lead which i will place on it, i shall make a hole in the metal. the heat of the lamp itself would do no harm to the platinum, nor would other chemical means; but because there is a little lead present, and there is an affinity between the two substances, the bodies fuse together at once. you see the hole i have made. it is large enough to put your finger in, though the platinum itself was, as you saw, almost infusible, except by the voltaic battery. for the purpose of shewing this fact in a more striking manner, i have taken pieces of platinum-foil, tin-foil, and lead-foil, and rolled them together; and if i apply the blowpipe to them, you will have, in fact, a repetition on a larger scale of the experiment you saw just now when the lead and platinum came together, and one spoiled the other. when the metals are laid one upon the other, and folded together and heat applied, you will not only see that the platinum runs to waste, but that at the time when the platinum and lead are combined there is ignition produced--there is a power of sustaining combustion. i have taken a large piece, that you may see the phenomenon on a large scale. you saw the ignition and the explosion which followed, of which we have here the results--the consequence of the chemical affinity between the platinum and the metals combined with it, which is the thing upon which deville founds his first result. when he has melted these substances and stirred them well up, and so obtained a complete mixture, he throws in air upon the surface to burn off all the sulphur from the remaining sulphuret of lead; and at last he gets an ingot of lead with platinum--much lead, comparatively, and little platinum. he gets that in the crucible with a lot of scoriæ and other things, which he treats afterwards. it is that platiniferous lead which we have to deal with in our future process. now, let me tell you what he does with it. his first object is to get rid of the lead. he has thrown out all the iron, and a number of other things, and he has got this kind of compound indicated in the table. he may get it as high as per cent. of platinum, and of lead; or , or , or of platinum, and , or , or of lead (which he calls weak platinum), and he then places it in the kind of vessel that you see before you. suppose we had the mixture here; we should have to make it hot, and then throw in air upon the surface. the combustible metal--that is, the lead--and the part that will oxidise, are thoroughly oxidised; the litharge would flow out in a fused state into a vessel placed to receive it, and the platinum remains behind. [illustration: fig. .] here is the process which deville adopts for the purpose of casting off the lead, after he has got out the platinum from the ore. (having made use of your friend, you get rid of him as quickly as you can.) he gets his heat by applying the combination of oxygen and hydrogen, or of carburetted fuel, for the purpose of producing a fire. i have here a source of coal-gas; there i have a source of hydrogen; and here i have a source of oxygen. i have here also one of the blowpipes used by deville in his process for working platinum in the way i have spoken of. there are two pipes, and one of them goes to the source of coal-gas, and the other to the supply of oxygen. [illustration: fig. .] by uniting these we obtain a flame of such a heat as to melt platinum. you will, perhaps, hardly imagine what the heat is, unless you have some proof of it; but you will soon see that i have actually the power of melting platinum. here is a piece of platinum-foil running like wax under the flame which i am bringing to bear against it. the question, however, is whether we shall get heat enough to melt, not this small quantity, but large masses--many pounds of the metal. having obtained heat like this, the next consideration is what vessel is he to employ which could retain the platinum when so heated, or bear the effects of the flame? such vessels are happily well supplied at paris, and are formed of a substance which surrounds paris; it is a kind of chalk (called, i believe, by geologists, _calcaire grossière_), and it has the property of enduring an extreme degree of heat. i am now going to get the highest heat that we can obtain. first, i shew you the combustion of hydrogen by itself. i have not a large supply, because the coal-gas is sufficient for most of our purposes. if i put a piece of lime obtained from this chalk into the gas, you see we get a pretty hot flame, which would burn one's fingers a good deal but now let me subject a piece of it to the joint action of oxygen and hydrogen. i do this for the purpose of shewing you the value of lime as a material for the furnaces and chambers that are to contain the substances to be operated on, and that are consequently to sustain the action of this extreme heat. here we have the hydrogen and the oxygen, which will give the most intense heat that can be obtained by chemical action; and if i put a piece of lime into the flame, we get what is called the lime-light. now, with all the beauty and intensity of action which you perceive, there is no sensible deterioration of the lime except by the mechanical force of the current of gases rushing from the jet against the lime, sweeping away such particles as are not strongly aggregated. "vapour of lime" some call it; and it may be so, but there is no other change of the lime than that under the action of heat of this highly-exalted chemical condition, though almost any other substance would melt at once. then, as to the way in which the heat is applied to the substance. it is all very well for me to take a piece of antimony, and fuse it in the flame of a blowpipe. but if i tried this piece in the ordinary lamp flame, i should do nothing; if i tried a smaller piece, i should do little or nothing; and if i tried a still smaller piece, i should do little or nothing; yet i have a condition which will represent what deville carries to the highest possible extent, and which we all carry to the highest extent, in the use of the blowpipe. suppose i take this piece of antimony: i shall not be able to melt it in that flame of the candle by merely holding it there; yet, by taking pains, we can even melt a piece of platinum there. this is a preparation which i made for the purpose of proving the fusibility of platinum in a common candle. there is a piece of wire, drawn by that ingenious process of dr. wollaston's, not more than the three-thousandth part of an inch in diameter. he put the wire into the middle of a cylinder of silver, and drew both together until the whole compound was exceedingly thin; and then he dissolved away the silver by nitric acid. there was left in the centre a substance which i can scarcely see with an eye-glass, but which i know is there, and which i can make visible, as you see, by putting it into the candle, where the heat makes it glow like a spark. i have again and again tried this experiment up-stairs in my own room, and have easily fused this platinum-wire by a common candle. you see we have, therefore, heat enough in the candle, as in the voltaic battery, or in the highly-exalted combustion of the blowpipe, but we do not supply a continuous source of heat. in the very act of this becoming ignited, the heat radiates so fast that you cannot accumulate enough to cause the fusion of the wire, except under the most careful arrangement. thus i cannot melt that piece of antimony by simply putting it into the candle; but if i put it upon charcoal, and drive the fiery current against it, there will be heat enough to melt it. the beauty of the blowpipe is, that it sends hot air (making hot air by the combustion of the flame) against the thing to be heated. i have only to hold the antimony in the course of that current, and particle by particle of the current impinges upon the antimony, and so we get it melted. you now see it red-hot, and i have no doubt it will continue to burn if i withdraw it from the flame and continue to force the air on it. now, you see it burning without any heat but that of its own combustion, which i am keeping up by sending the air against it. it would go out in a moment if i took away the current of air from it; but there it is burning, and the more air i give it, by this or any other action, the better it is. so, then, we have here not merely a mighty source of heat, but a means of driving the heat forcibly against substances. let me shew you another experiment with a piece of iron. it will serve two purposes--shewing you what the blowpipe does as a source of heat, and what it does by sending that heat where it is wanted. i have taken iron in contrast with silver or other metals, that you may see the difference of action, and so be more interested in the experiment. here is our fuel, the coal-gas; and here our oxygen. having thus my power of heat, i apply it to the iron, which, as you see, soon gets red-hot. it is now flowing about like a globule of melted mercury. but observe, i cannot raise any vapour: it is now covered with a coat of melted oxide, and unless i have a great power in my blowpipe, it is hardly possible to break through it. now, then, you see these beautiful sparks: you have not only a beautiful kind of combustion, but you see the iron is being driven off, not producing smoke, but burning in a fixed condition. how different this is from the action of some other metals--that piece of antimony, for instance, which we saw just now throwing off abundance of fumes. we can, of course, burn away this iron by giving plenty of air to it; but with the bodies which deville wants to expose to this intense heat he has not that means: the gas itself must have power enough to drive off the slag which forms on the surface of the metal, and power to impinge upon the platinum so as to get the full contact that he wants for the fusion to take place. we see here, then, the means to which he resorts--oxygen, and either coal-gas or water-gas[ ], or pure hydrogen, for producing heat, and the blowpipe for the purpose of impelling the heated current upon the metals. i have two or three rough drawings here, representing the kind of furnaces which he employs. they are larger, however, than the actual furnaces he uses. even the furnace in which he carries on that most serious operation of fusing fifty pounds of platinum at once is not much more than half the size of the drawing. it is made of a piece of lime below and a piece of lime above. you see how beautifully lime sustains heat without altering in shape; and you may have thought how beautifully it prevents the dissipation of the heat by its very bad conducting powers. [illustration: fig. ] while the front part of the lime which you saw here was so highly ignited, i could at any moment touch the back of it without feeling any annoyance from the heat so, by having a chamber of lime of this sort, he is able to get a vessel to contain these metals with scarcely any loss of heat. he puts the blowpipes through these apertures, and sends down these gases upon the metals, which are gradually melted. he then puts in more metal through a hole at the top. the results of the combustion issue out of the aperture which you see represented. if there be strips of platinum, he pushes them through the mouth out of which the heated current is coming, and there they get red-hot and white-hot before they get into the bath of platinum. so he is able to fuse a large body of platinum in this manner. when the platinum is melted, he takes off the top and pours out from the bottom piece, like a crucible, and makes his cast. this is the furnace by which he fuses his forty pounds or fifty pounds of platinum at once. the metal is raised to a heat that no eye can bear. there is no light and shadow, no chiaro-oscuro there; all is the same intensity of glow. you look in, and you cannot see where the metal or the lime is; it is all as one. we have, therefore, a platform with a handle, which turns upon an axis, that coincides with the gutter that is formed for the pouring of the metal; and when all is known to be ready, by means of dark glasses, the workmen take off the top piece and lift up the handle, and the mould being then placed in a proper position, he knows that the issue of the metal will be exactly in the line of the axis. no injury has ever happened from the use of this plan. you know with what care it is necessary to carry such a vessel of mercury as we have here, for fear of turning it over on one side or the other; but if it be a vessel of melted platinum, the very greatest care must be used, because the substance is twice as heavy: yet no injury has been done to any of the workmen in this operation. i have said that deville depends upon intense heat for carrying off vapour; and this brings me to the point of shewing how vapours are carried off. here is a basin of mercury, which boils easily, as you know, and gives us the opportunity of observing the facts and principles which are to guide us. i have here two poles of the battery, and if i bring them into contact with the mercury, see what a development of vapour we have. the mercury is flying off rapidly; and i might, if i pleased, put all the company around me in a bath of mercury vapour. and so, if we take this piece of lead and treat it in the same way, it will also give off vapour. observe the fumes that rise from it; and even if it was so far enclosed from the air that you could not form any litharge, you would still have those abundant fumes flying off. i may also take a piece of gold, and shew you the same thing. i have here a piece of gold which i put upon a clean surface of paris limestone. applying the heat of the blowpipe to it, you see how the heat drives off the vapour; and if you notice at the end of the lecture, you will observe on the stone a purple patch of condensed gold. thus you see a proof of the volatilisation of gold. it is the same with silver. you will not be startled if i sometimes use one agent and sometimes another to illustrate a particular point. the volatility of gold and silver is the same thing, whether it be effected by the voltaic battery or by the blowpipe. [a lump of silver was placed in a charcoal crucible between the poles of a voltaic battery.] now, look at the fumes of silver, and observe the peculiar and beautiful green colour which they produce. we shall now shew you this same process of boiling the silver, cast on a screen from the electric lamp which you have before you; and while dr. tyndall is kindly getting the lamp ready for this purpose, let me tell you that deville proposes to throw out in this way all these extraneous things that i have spoken of, except two--namely, iridium and rhodium. it so happens, as he says, that iridium and rhodium do make the metal more capable of resisting the attacks of acids than platinum itself. alloys are compounded up to per cent. of rhodium and iridium, by which the chemical inaction of the platinum is increased, and also its malleability and other physical properties. [the image of the voltaic discharge through vapour of silver was now thrown upon the screen.] what you have now on the screen is an inverted image of what you saw when we heated the silver before. the fine stream that you see around the silver is the discharge of the electric force that takes place, giving you that glorious green light which you see in the ray; and if dr. tyndall will open the top of the lamp, you will see the quantity of fumes that will come out of the aperture, shewing you at once the volatility of silver. i have now finished this imperfect account. it is but an apology for not having brought the process itself before you. i have done the best i could under the circumstances; and i know your kindness well, for if i were not aware that i might trust to it, i would not appear here so often as i have done. the gradual loss of memory and of my other faculties is making itself painfully evident to me, and requires, every time i appear before you, the continued remembrance of your kindness to enable me to get through my task. if i should happen to go on too long, or should fail in doing what you might desire, remember it is yourselves who are chargeable, by wishing me to remain. i have desired to retire, as i think every man ought to do before his faculties become impaired; but i must confess that the affection i have for this place, and for those who frequent this place, is such, that i hardly know when the proper time has arrived. notes. [footnote : page . the royal george sunk at spithead on the th of august, . colonel pasley commenced operations for the removal of the wreck by the explosion of gunpowder, in august, . the candle which professor faraday exhibited must therefore have been exposed to the action of salt water for upwards of fifty-seven years.] [footnote : page . the fat or tallow consists of a chemical combination of fatty acids with glycerine. the lime unites with the palmitic, oleic, and stearic acids, and separates the glycerine. after washing, the insoluble lime soap is decomposed with hot dilute sulphuric acid. the melted fatty acids thus rise as an oil to the surface, when they are decanted. they are again washed and cast into thin plates, which, when cold, are placed between layers of cocoa-nut matting, and submitted to intense hydraulic pressure. in this way the soft oleic acid is squeezed out, whilst the hard palmitic and stearic acids remain. these are further purified by pressure at a higher temperature, and washing in warm dilute sulphuric acid, when they are ready to be made into candles. these acids are harder and whiter than the fats from which they were obtained, whilst at the same time they are cleaner and more combustible.] [footnote : page . a little borax or phosphorus salt is sometimes added, in order to make the ash fusible.] [footnote : page . capillary attraction or repulsion is the cause which determines the ascent or descent of a fluid in a capillary tube. if a piece of thermometer tubing, open at each end, be plunged into water, the latter will instantly rise in the tube considerably above its external level. if, on the other hand, the tube be plunged into mercury, a repulsion instead of attraction will be exhibited, and the level of the mercury will be lower in the tube than it is outside.] [footnote : page . the late duke of sussex was, we believe, the first to shew that a prawn might be washed upon this principle. if the tail, after pulling off the fan part, be placed in a tumbler of water, and the head be allowed to hang over the outside, the water will be sucked up the tail by capillary attraction, and will continue to run out through the head until the water in the glass has sunk so low that the tail ceases to dip into it.] [footnote : page . the alcohol had chloride of copper dissolved in it: this produces a beautiful green flame.] [footnote : page . lycopodium is a yellowish powder found in the fruit of the club moss (_lycopodium clavatum_). it is used in fireworks.] [footnote : page . bunsen has calculated that the temperature of the oxyhydrogen blowpipe is ° centigrade. hydrogen burning in air has a temperature of ° c., and coal-gas in air, ° c.] [footnote : page . the following is the action of the sulphuric acid in inflaming the mixture of sulphuret of antimony and chlorate of potassa. a portion of the latter is decomposed by the sulphuric acid into oxide of chlorine, bisulphate of potassa, and perchlorate of potassa. the oxide of chlorine inflames the sulphuret of antimony, which is a combustible body, and the whole mass instantly bursts into flame.] [footnote : page . the "air-burner," which is of such value in the laboratory, owes its advantage to this principle. it consists of a cylindrical metal chimney, covered at the top with a piece of rather coarse iron-wire gauze. this is supported over an argand burner, in such a manner that the gas may mix in the chimney with an amount of air sufficient to burn the carbon and hydrogen simultaneously, so that there may be no separation of carbon in the flame with consequent deposition of soot. the flame, being unable to pass through the wire gauze, burns in a steady, nearly invisible manner above.] [footnote : page . water is in its densest state at a temperature of . ° fahrenheit] [footnote : page . a mixture of salt and pounded ice reduces the temperature from ° f. to zero--the ice at the same time becoming fluid.] [footnote : page . potassium, the metallic basis of potash, was discovered by sir humphrey davy in , who succeeded in separating it from potash by means of a powerful voltaic battery. its great affinity for oxygen causes it to decompose water with evolution of hydrogen, which takes fire with the heat produced.] [footnote : page . professor faraday has calculated that there is as much electricity required to decompose one grain of water as there is in a very powerful flash of lightning.] [footnote : page . a solution of acetate of lead submitted to the action of the voltaic current, yields lead at the negative pole, and brown peroxide of lead at the positive pole. a solution of nitrate of silver, under the same circumstances, yields silver at the negative pole, and peroxide of silver at the positive pole.] [footnote : page . the gas which is thus employed as a test for the presence of oxygen, is the binoxide of nitrogen, or nitrous oxide. it is a colourless gas, which, when brought in contact with oxygen, unites with it, forming hyponitric acid, the red gas referred to.] [footnote : page . _marble_ is a compound of carbonic acid and lime. the muriatic acid being the stronger of the two, takes the place of the carbonic acid, which escapes as a gas, the residue forming muriate of lime or chloride of calcium.] [footnote : page . _lead pyrophorus_ is made by heating dry tartrate of lead in a glass tube (closed at one end, and drawn out to a fine point at the other) until no more vapours are evolved. the open end of the tube is then to be sealed before the blowpipe. when the tube is broken and the contents shaken out into the air, they burn with a red flash.] [footnote : page . _water-gas_ is formed by passing vapour of water over red-hot charcoal or coke. it is a mixture of hydrogen and carbonic oxide; each of which is an inflammable gas.] poster's note: "combustion that makes!" was corrected from a misprint "combusion that makes!" in the original. an elementary study of chemistry by william mcpherson, ph.d. professor of chemistry, ohio state university and william edwards henderson, ph.d. associate professor of chemistry, ohio state university _revised edition_ ginn & company boston * new york * chicago * london copyright, , , by william mcpherson and william e. henderson all rights reserved the athenæum press ginn & company * proprietors * boston * u.s.a. transcriber's note: for text: a word surrounded by a cedilla such as ~this~ signifies that the word is bolded in the text. a word surrounded by underscores like _this_ signifies the word is italics in the text. the italic and bold markup for single italized letters (such as variables in equations) and "foreign" abbreviations are deleted for easier reading. for numbers and equations: parentheses have been added to clarify fractions. underscores before bracketed numbers in equations denote a subscript. superscripts are designated with a caret and brackets, e.g. . ^{ } is . to the third power. appendix a and b have been moved to the end of the book. minor typos have been corrected. preface in offering this book to teachers of elementary chemistry the authors lay no claim to any great originality. it has been their aim to prepare a text-book constructed along lines which have become recognized as best suited to an elementary treatment of the subject. at the same time they have made a consistent effort to make the text clear in outline, simple in style and language, conservatively modern in point of view, and thoroughly teachable. the question as to what shall be included in an elementary text on chemistry is perhaps the most perplexing one which an author must answer. while an enthusiastic chemist with a broad understanding of the science is very apt to go beyond the capacity of the elementary student, the authors of this text, after an experience of many years, cannot help believing that the tendency has been rather in the other direction. in many texts no mention at all is made of fundamental laws of chemical action because their complete presentation is quite beyond the comprehension of the student, whereas in many cases it is possible to present the essential features of these laws in a way that will be of real assistance in the understanding of the science. for example, it is a difficult matter to deduce the law of mass action in any very simple way; yet the elementary student can readily comprehend that reactions are reversible, and that the point of equilibrium depends upon, rather simple conditions. the authors believe that it is worth while to present such principles in even an elementary and partial manner because they are of great assistance to the general student, and because they make a foundation upon which the student who continues his studies to more advanced courses can securely build. the authors have no apologies to make for the extent to which they have made use of the theory of electrolytic dissociation. it is inevitable that in any rapidly developing science there will be differences of opinion in regard to the value of certain theories. there can be no question, however, that the outline of the theory of dissociation here presented is in accord with the views of the very great majority of the chemists of the present time. moreover, its introduction to the extent to which the authors have presented it simplifies rather than increases the difficulties with which the development of the principles of the science is attended. the oxygen standard for atomic weights has been adopted throughout the text. the international committee, to which is assigned the duty of yearly reporting a revised list of the atomic weights of the elements, has adopted this standard for their report, and there is no longer any authority for the older hydrogen standard. the authors do not believe that the adoption of the oxygen standard introduces any real difficulties in making perfectly clear the methods by which atomic weights are calculated. the problems appended to the various chapters have been chosen with a view not only of fixing the principles developed in the text in the mind of the student, but also of enabling him to answer such questions as arise in his laboratory work. they are, therefore, more or less practical in character. it is not necessary that all of them should be solved, though with few exceptions the lists are not long. the answers to the questions are not directly given in the text as a rule, but can be inferred from the statements made. they therefore require independent thought on the part of the student. with very few exceptions only such experiments are included in the text as cannot be easily carried out by the student. it is expected that these will be performed by the teacher at the lecture table. directions for laboratory work by the student are published in a separate volume. while the authors believe that the most important function of the elementary text is to develop the principles of the science, they recognize the importance of some discussion of the practical application of these principles to our everyday life. considerable space is therefore devoted to this phase of chemistry. the teacher should supplement this discussion whenever possible by having the class visit different factories where chemical processes are employed. although this text is now for the first time offered to teachers of elementary chemistry, it has nevertheless been used by a number of teachers during the past three years. the present edition has been largely rewritten in the light of the criticisms offered, and we desire to express our thanks to the many teachers who have helped us in this respect, especially to dr. william lloyd evans of this laboratory, a teacher of wide experience, for his continued interest and helpfulness. we also very cordially solicit correspondence with teachers who may find difficulties or inaccuracies in the text. the authors wish to make acknowledgments for the photographs and engravings of eminent chemists from which the cuts included in the text were taken; to messrs. elliott and fry, london, england, for that of ramsay; to the macmillan company for those of davy and dalton, taken from the century science series; to the l. e. knott apparatus company, boston, for that of bunsen. the authors ohio state university columbus, ohio contents chapter page i. introduction ii. oxygen iii. hydrogen iv. water and hydrogen dioxide v. the atomic theory vi. chemical equations and calculations vii. nitrogen and the rare elements in the atmosphere viii. the atmosphere ix. solutions x. acids, bases, and salts; neutralization xi. valence xii. compounds of nitrogen xiii. reversible reactions and chemical equilibrium xiv. sulphur and its compounds xv. periodic law xvi. the chlorine family xvii. carbon and some of its simpler compounds xviii. flames,--illuminants xix. molecular weights, atomic weights, formulas xx. the phosphorus family xxi. silicon, titanium, boron xxii. the metals xxiii. the alkali metals xxiv. the alkaline-earth family xxv. the magnesium family xxvi. the aluminium family xxvii. the iron family xxviii. copper, mercury, and silver xxix. tin and lead xxx. manganese and chromium xxxi. gold and the platinum family xxxii. some simple organic compounds index appendix a facing back cover appendix b inside back cover list of full-page illustrations page antoine laurent lavoisier _frontispiece_ joseph priestley john dalton william ramsay dmitri ivanovitch mendelÉeff henri moissan sir humphry davy robert wilhelm bunsen an elementary study of chemistry chapter i introduction ~the natural sciences.~ before we advance very far in the study of nature, it becomes evident that the one large study must be divided into a number of more limited ones for the convenience of the investigator as well as of the student. these more limited studies are called the _natural sciences_. since the study of nature is divided in this way for mere convenience, and not because there is any division in nature itself, it often happens that the different sciences are very intimately related, and a thorough knowledge of any one of them involves a considerable acquaintance with several others. thus the botanist must know something about animals as well as about plants; the student of human physiology must know something about physics as well as about the parts of the body. ~intimate relation of chemistry and physics.~ physics and chemistry are two sciences related in this close way, and it is not easy to make a precise distinction between them. in a general way it may be said that they are both concerned with inanimate matter rather than with living, and more particularly with the changes which such matter may be made to undergo. these changes must be considered more closely before a definition of the two sciences can be given. ~physical changes.~ one class of changes is not accompanied by an alteration in the composition of matter. when a lump of coal is broken the pieces do not differ from the original lump save in size. a rod of iron may be broken into pieces; it may be magnetized; it may be heated until it glows; it may be melted. in none of these changes has the composition of the iron been affected. the pieces of iron, the magnetized iron, the glowing iron, the melted iron, are just as truly iron as was the original rod. sugar may be dissolved in water, but neither the sugar nor the water is changed in composition. the resulting liquid has the sweet taste of sugar; moreover the water may be evaporated by heating and the sugar recovered unchanged. such changes are called _physical changes_. definition: _physical changes are those which do not involve a change in the composition of the matter._ ~chemical changes.~ matter may undergo other changes in which its composition is altered. when a lump of coal is burned ashes and invisible gases are formed which are entirely different in composition and properties from the original coal. a rod of iron when exposed to moist air is gradually changed into rust, which is entirely different from the original iron. when sugar is heated a black substance is formed which is neither sweet nor soluble in water. such changes are evidently quite different from the physical changes just described, for in them new substances are formed in place of the ones undergoing change. changes of this kind are called _chemical changes_. definition: _chemical changes are those which involve a change in the composition of the matter._ ~how to distinguish between physical and chemical changes.~ it is not always easy to tell to which class a given change belongs, and many cases will require careful thought on the part of the student. the test question in all cases is, has the composition of the substance been changed? usually this can be answered by a study of the properties of the substance before and after the change, since a change in composition is attended by a change in properties. in some cases, however, only a trained observer can decide the question. ~changes in physical state.~ one class of physical changes should be noted with especial care, since it is likely to prove misleading. it is a familiar fact that ice is changed into water, and water into steam, by heating. here we have three different substances,--the solid ice, the liquid water, and the gaseous steam,--the properties of which differ widely. the chemist can readily show, however, that these three bodies have exactly the same composition, being composed of the same substances in the same proportion. hence the change from one of these substances into another is a physical change. many other substances may, under suitable conditions, be changed from solids into liquids, or from liquids into gases, without change in composition. thus butter and wax will melt when heated; alcohol and gasoline will evaporate when exposed to the air. _the three states--solid, liquid, and gas--are called the three physical states of matter._ ~physical and chemical properties.~ many properties of a substance can be noted without causing the substance to undergo chemical change, and are therefore called its _physical properties_. among these are its physical state, color, odor, taste, size, shape, weight. other properties are only discovered when the substance undergoes chemical change. these are called its _chemical properties_. thus we find that coal burns in air, gunpowder explodes when ignited, milk sours when exposed to air. ~definition of physics and chemistry.~ it is now possible to make a general distinction between physics and chemistry. definition: _physics is the science which deals with those changes in matter which do not involve a change in composition._ definition: _chemistry is the science which deals with those changes in matter which do involve a change in composition._ ~two factors in all changes.~ in all the changes which matter can undergo, whether physical or chemical, two factors must be taken into account, namely, _energy_ and _matter_. ~energy.~ it is a familiar fact that certain bodies have the power to do work. thus water falling from a height upon a water wheel turns the wheel and in this way does the work of the mills. magnetized iron attracts iron to itself and the motion of the iron as it moves towards the magnet can be made to do work. when coal is burned it causes the engine to move and transports the loaded cars from place to place. when a body has this power to do work it is said to possess energy. ~law of conservation of energy.~ careful experiments have shown that when one body parts with its energy the energy is not destroyed but is transferred to another body or system of bodies. just as energy cannot be destroyed, neither can it be created. if one body gains a certain amount of energy, some other body has lost an equivalent amount. these facts are summed up in the law of conservation of energy which may be stated thus: _while energy can be changed from one form into another, it cannot be created or destroyed._ ~transformations of energy.~ although energy can neither be created nor destroyed, it is evident that it may assume many different forms. thus the falling water may turn the electric generator and produce a current of electricity. the energy lost by the falling water is thus transformed into the energy of the electric current. this in turn may be changed into the energy of motion, as when the current is used for propelling the cars, or into the energy of heat and light, as when it is used for heating and lighting the cars. again, the energy of coal may be converted into energy of heat and subsequently of motion, as when it is used as a fuel in steam engines. since the energy possessed by coal only becomes available when the coal is made to undergo a chemical change, it is sometimes called _chemical energy_. it is this form of energy in which we are especially interested in the study of chemistry. ~matter.~ matter may be defined as that which occupies space and possesses weight. like energy, matter may be changed oftentimes from one form into another; and since in these transformations all the other physical properties of a substance save weight are likely to change, the inquiry arises, does the weight also change? much careful experimenting has shown that it does not. the weight of the products formed in any change in matter always equals the weight of the substances undergoing change. ~law of conservation of matter.~ the important truth just stated is frequently referred to as the law of conservation of matter, and this law may be briefly stated thus: _matter can neither be created nor destroyed, though it can be changed from one form into another._ ~classification of matter.~ at first sight there appears to be no limit to the varieties of matter of which the world is made. for convenience in study we may classify all these varieties under three heads, namely, _mechanical mixtures_, _chemical compounds_, and _elements_. [illustration: fig. ] ~mechanical mixtures.~ if equal bulks of common salt and iron filings are thoroughly mixed together, a product is obtained which, judging by its appearance, is a new substance. if it is examined more closely, however, it will be seen to be merely a mixture of the salt and iron, each of which substances retains its own peculiar properties. the mixture tastes just like salt; the iron particles can be seen and their gritty character detected. a magnet rubbed in the mixture draws out the iron just as if the salt were not there. on the other hand, the salt can be separated from the iron quite easily. thus, if several grams of the mixture are placed in a test tube, and the tube half filled with water and thoroughly shaken, the salt dissolves in the water. the iron particles can then be filtered from the liquid by pouring the entire mixture upon a piece of filter paper folded so as to fit into the interior of a funnel (fig. ). the paper retains the solid but allows the clear liquid, known as the _filtrate_, to drain through. the iron particles left upon the filter paper will be found to be identical with the original iron. the salt can be recovered from the filtrate by evaporation of the water. to accomplish this the filtrate is poured into a small evaporating dish and gently heated (fig. ) until the water has disappeared, or _evaporated_. the solid left in the dish is identical in every way with the original salt. both the iron and the salt have thus been recovered in their original condition. it is evident that no new substance has been formed by rubbing the salt and iron together. the product is called a _mechanical mixture_. such mixtures are very common in nature, almost all minerals, sands, and soils being examples of this class of substances. it is at once apparent that there is no law regulating the composition of a mechanical mixture, and no two mixtures are likely to have exactly the same composition. the ingredients of a mechanical mixture can usually be separated by mechanical means, such as sifting, sorting, magnetic attraction, or by dissolving one constituent and leaving the other unchanged. [illustration: fig. ] definition: _a mechanical mixture is one in which the constituents retain their original properties, no chemical action having taken place when they were brought together._ ~chemical compounds.~ if iron filings and powdered sulphur are thoroughly ground together in a mortar, a yellowish-green substance results. it might easily be taken to be a new body; but as in the case of the iron and salt, the ingredients can readily be separated. a magnet draws out the iron. water does not dissolve the sulphur, but other liquids do, as, for example, the liquid called carbon disulphide. when the mixture is treated with carbon disulphide the iron is left unchanged, and the sulphur can be obtained again, after filtering off the iron, by evaporating the liquid. the substance is, therefore, a mechanical mixture. if now a new portion of the mixture is placed in a dry test tube and carefully heated in the flame of a bunsen burner, as shown in fig. , a striking change takes place. the mixture begins to glow at some point, the glow rapidly extending throughout the whole mass. if the test tube is now broken and the product examined, it will be found to be a hard, black, brittle substance, in no way recalling the iron or the sulphur. the magnet no longer attracts it; carbon disulphide will not dissolve sulphur from it. it is a new substance with new properties, resulting from the chemical union of iron and sulphur, and is called iron sulphide. such substances are called _chemical compounds_, and differ from mechanical mixtures in that the substances producing them lose their own characteristic properties. we shall see later that the two also differ in that the composition of a chemical compound never varies. [illustration: fig. ] definition: _a chemical compound is a substance the constituents of which have lost their own characteristic properties, and which cannot be separated save by a chemical change._ ~elements.~ it has been seen that iron sulphide is composed of two entirely different substances,--iron and sulphur. the question arises, do these substances in turn contain other substances, that is, are they also chemical compounds? chemists have tried in a great many ways to decompose them, but all their efforts have failed. substances which have resisted all efforts to decompose them into other substances are called _elements_. it is not always easy to prove that a given substance is really an element. some way as yet untried may be successful in decomposing it into other simpler forms of matter, and the supposed element will then prove to be a compound. water, lime, and many other familiar compounds were at one time thought to be elements. definition: _an element is a substance which cannot be separated into simpler substances by any known means._ ~kinds of matter.~ while matter has been grouped in three classes for the purpose of study, it will be apparent that there are really but two distinct kinds of matter, namely, compounds and elements. a mechanical mixture is not a third distinct kind of matter, but is made up of varying quantities of either compounds or elements or both. ~alchemy.~ in olden times it was thought that some way could be found to change one element into another, and a great many efforts were made to accomplish this transformation. most of these efforts were directed toward changing the commoner metals into gold, and many fanciful ways for doing this were described. the chemists of that time were called _alchemists_, and the art which they practiced was called _alchemy_. the alchemists gradually became convinced that the only way common metals could be changed into gold was by the wonderful power of a magic substance which they called the _philosopher's stone_, which would accomplish this transformation by its mere touch and would in addition give perpetual youth to its fortunate possessor. no one has ever found such a stone, and no one has succeeded in changing one metal into another. ~number of elements.~ the number of substances now considered to be elements is not large--about eighty in all. many of these are rare, and very few of them make any large fraction of the materials in the earth's crust. clarke gives the following estimate of the composition of the earth's crust: oxygen . % calcium . % silicon . magnesium . aluminium . sodium . iron . potassium . other elements . % a complete list of the elements is given in the appendix. in this list the more common of the elements are marked with an asterisk. it is not necessary to study more than a third of the total number of elements to gain a very good knowledge of chemistry. ~physical state of the elements.~ about ten of the elements are gases at ordinary temperatures. two--mercury and bromine--are liquids. the others are all solids, though their melting points vary through wide limits, from cæsium which melts at ° to elements which do not melt save in the intense heat of the electric furnace. ~occurrence of the elements.~ comparatively few of the elements occur as uncombined substances in nature, most of them being found in the form of chemical compounds. when an element does occur by itself, as is the case with gold, we say that it occurs in the _free state_ or _native_; when it is combined with other substances in the form of compounds, we say that it occurs in the _combined state_, or _in combination_. in the latter case there is usually little about the compound to suggest that the element is present in it; for we have seen that elements lose their own peculiar properties when they enter into combination with other elements. it would never be suspected, for example, that the reddish, earthy-looking iron ore contains iron. ~names of elements.~ the names given to the elements have been selected in a great many different ways. ( ) some names are very old and their original meaning is obscure. such names are iron, gold, and copper. ( ) many names indicate some striking physical property of the element. the name bromine, for example, is derived from a greek word meaning a stench, referring to the extremely unpleasant odor of the substance. the name iodine comes from a word meaning violet, alluding to the beautiful color of iodine vapor. ( ) some names indicate prominent chemical properties of the elements. thus, nitrogen means the producer of niter, nitrogen being a constituent of niter or saltpeter. hydrogen means water former, signifying its presence in water. argon means lazy or inert, the element being so named because of its inactivity. ( ) other elements are named from countries or localities, as germanium and scandium. ~symbols.~ in indicating the elements found in compounds it is inconvenient to use such long names, and hence chemists have adopted a system of abbreviations. these abbreviations are known as _symbols_, each element having a distinctive symbol. ( ) sometimes the initial letter of the name will suffice to indicate the element. thus i stands for iodine, c for carbon. ( ) usually it is necessary to add some other characteristic letter to the symbol, since several names may begin with the same letter. thus c stands for carbon, cl for chlorine, cd for cadmium, ce for cerium, cb for columbium. ( ) sometimes the symbol is an abbreviation of the old latin name. in this way fe (ferrum) indicates iron, cu (cuprum), copper, au (aurum), gold. the symbols are included in the list of elements given in the appendix. they will become familiar through constant use. ~chemical affinity the cause of chemical combination.~ the agency which causes substances to combine and which holds them together when combined is called _chemical affinity_. the experiments described in this chapter, however, show that heat is often necessary to bring about chemical action. the distinction between the cause producing chemical action and the circumstances favoring it must be clearly made. chemical affinity is always the cause of chemical union. many agencies may make it possible for chemical affinity to act by overcoming circumstances which stand in its way. among these agencies are heat, light, and electricity. as a rule, solution also promotes action between two substances. sometimes these agencies may overcome chemical attraction and so occasion the decomposition of a compound. exercises . to what class of changes do the following belong? (a) the melting of ice; (b) the souring of milk; (c) the burning of a candle; (d) the explosion of gunpowder; (e) the corrosion of metals. what test question must be applied in each of the above cases? . give two additional examples (a) of chemical changes; (b) of physical changes. . is a chemical change always accompanied by a physical change? is a physical change always accompanied by a chemical change? . give two or more characteristics of a chemical change. . (a) when a given weight of water freezes, does it absorb or evolve heat? (b) when the resulting ice melts, is the total heat change the same or different from that of freezing? . give three examples of each of the following: (a) mechanical mixtures; (b) chemical compounds; (c) elements. . give the derivation of the names of the following elements: thorium, gallium, selenium, uranium. (consult dictionary.) . give examples of chemical changes which are produced through the agency of heat; of light; of electricity. chapter ii oxygen ~history.~ the discovery of oxygen is generally attributed to the english chemist priestley, who in obtained the element by heating a compound of mercury and oxygen, known as red oxide of mercury. it is probable, however, that the swedish chemist scheele had previously obtained it, although an account of his experiments was not published until . the name oxygen signifies acid former. it was given to the element by the french chemist lavoisier, since he believed that all acids owe their characteristic properties to the presence of oxygen. this view we now know to be incorrect. ~occurrence.~ oxygen is by far the most abundant of all the elements. it occurs both in the free and in the combined state. in the free state it occurs in the air, volumes of dry air containing about volumes of oxygen. in the combined state it forms eight ninths of water and nearly one half of the rocks composing the earth's crust. it is also an important constituent of the compounds which compose plant and animal tissues; for example, about % by weight of the human body is oxygen. ~preparation.~ although oxygen occurs in the free state in the atmosphere, its separation from the nitrogen and other gases with which it is mixed is such a difficult matter that in the laboratory it has been found more convenient to prepare it from its compounds. the most important of the laboratory methods are the following: . _preparation from water._ water is a compound, consisting of . % hydrogen and . % oxygen. it is easily separated into these constituents by passing an electric current through it under suitable conditions. the process will be described in the chapter on water. while this method of preparation is a simple one, it is not economical. . _preparation from mercuric oxide._ this method is of interest, since it is the one which led to the discovery of oxygen. the oxide, which consists of . % oxygen and . % mercury, is placed in a small, glass test tube and heated. the compound is in this way decomposed into mercury which collects on the sides of the glass tube, forming a silvery mirror, and oxygen which, being a gas, escapes from the tube. the presence of the oxygen is shown by lighting the end of a splint, extinguishing the flame and bringing the glowing coal into the mouth of the tube. the oxygen causes the glowing coal to burst into a flame. in a similar way oxygen may be obtained from its compounds with some of the other elements. thus manganese dioxide, a black compound of manganese and oxygen, when heated to about °, loses one third of its oxygen, while barium dioxide, when heated, loses one half of its oxygen. . _preparation from potassium chlorate (usual laboratory method)._ potassium chlorate is a white solid which consists of . % potassium, . % chlorine, and . % oxygen. when heated it undergoes a series of changes in which all the oxygen is finally set free, leaving a compound of potassium and chlorine called potassium chloride. the change may be represented as follows: /potassium\ | | (potassium / potassium \ (potassium { chlorine } = { } + oxygen | | chlorate) \ chlorine / chloride) \oxygen / [illustration: joseph priestley (english) ( - ) school-teacher, theologian, philosopher, scientist; friend of benjamin franklin; discoverer of oxygen; defender of the phlogiston theory; the first to use mercury in a pneumatic trough, by which means he first isolated in gaseous form hydrochloric acid, sulphur dioxide, and ammonia] the evolution of the oxygen begins at about °. it has been found, however, that if the potassium chlorate is mixed with about one fourth its weight of manganese dioxide, the oxygen is given off at a much lower temperature. just how the manganese dioxide brings about this result is not definitely known. the amount of oxygen obtained from a given weight of potassium chlorate is exactly the same whether the manganese dioxide is present or not. so far as can be detected the manganese dioxide undergoes no change. [illustration: fig. ] ~directions for preparing oxygen.~ the manner of preparing oxygen from potassium chlorate is illustrated in the accompanying diagram (fig. ). a mixture consisting of one part of manganese dioxide and four parts of potassium chlorate is placed in the flask a and gently heated. the oxygen is evolved and escapes through the tube b. it is collected by bringing over the end of the tube the mouth of a bottle completely filled with water and inverted in a vessel of water, as shown in the figure. the gas rises in the bottle and displaces the water. in the preparation of large quantities of oxygen, a copper retort (fig. ) is often substituted for the glass flask. [illustration: fig. ] in the preparation of oxygen from potassium chlorate and manganese dioxide, the materials used must be pure, otherwise a violent explosion may occur. the purity of the materials is tested by heating a small amount of the mixture in a test tube. ~the collection of gases.~ the method used for collecting oxygen illustrates the general method used for collecting such gases as are insoluble in water or nearly so. the vessel c (fig. ), containing the water in which the bottles are inverted, is called a _pneumatic trough._ ~commercial methods of preparation.~ oxygen can now be purchased stored under great pressure in strong steel cylinders (fig. ). it is prepared either by heating a mixture of potassium chlorate and manganese dioxide, or by separating it from the nitrogen and other gases with which it is mixed in the atmosphere. the methods employed for effecting this separation will be described in subsequent chapters. [illustration: fig. ] ~physical properties.~ oxygen is a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas, slightly heavier than air. one liter of it, measured at a temperature of ° and under a pressure of one atmosphere, weighs . g., while under similar conditions one liter of air weighs . g. it is but slightly soluble in water. oxygen, like other gases, may be liquefied by applying very great pressure to the highly cooled gas. when the pressure is removed the liquid oxygen passes again into the gaseous state, since its boiling point under ordinary atmospheric pressure is - . °. ~chemical properties.~ at ordinary temperatures oxygen is not very active chemically. most substances are either not at all affected by it, or the action is so slow as to escape notice. at higher temperatures, however, it is very active, and unites directly with most of the elements. this activity may be shown by heating various substances until just ignited and then bringing them into vessels of the gas, when they will burn with great brilliancy. thus a glowing splint introduced into a jar of oxygen bursts into flame. sulphur burns in the air with a very weak flame and feeble light; in oxygen, however, the flame is increased in size and brightness. substances which readily burn in air, such as phosphorus, burn in oxygen with dazzling brilliancy. even substances which burn in air with great difficulty, such as iron, readily burn in oxygen. the burning of a substance in oxygen is due to the rapid combination of the substance or of the elements composing it with the oxygen. thus, when sulphur burns both the oxygen and sulphur disappear as such and there is formed a compound of the two, which is an invisible gas, having the characteristic odor of burning sulphur. similarly, phosphorus on burning forms a white solid compound of phosphorus and oxygen, while iron forms a reddish-black compound of iron and oxygen. ~oxidation.~ the term _oxidation_ is applied to the chemical change which takes place when a substance, or one of its constituent parts, combines with oxygen. this process may take place rapidly, as in the burning of phosphorus, or slowly, as in the oxidation (or rusting) of iron when exposed to the air. it is always accompanied by the liberation of heat. the amount of heat liberated by the oxidation of a definite weight of any given substance is always the same, being entirely independent of the rapidity of the process. if the oxidation takes place slowly, the heat is generated so slowly that it is difficult to detect it. if the oxidation takes place rapidly, however, the heat is generated in such a short interval of time that the substance may become white hot or burst into a flame. ~combustion; kindling temperature.~ when oxidation takes place so rapidly that the heat generated is sufficient to cause the substance to glow or burst into a flame the process is called _combustion_. in order that any substance may undergo combustion, it is necessary that it should be heated to a certain temperature, known as the _kindling temperature._ this temperature varies widely for different bodies, but is always definite for the same body. thus the kindling temperature of phosphorus is far lower than that of iron, but is definite for each. when any portion of a substance is heated until it begins to burn the combustion will continue without the further application of heat, provided the heat generated by the process is sufficient to bring other parts of the substance to the kindling temperature. on the other hand, if the heat generated is not sufficient to maintain the kindling temperature, combustion ceases. ~oxides.~ the compounds formed by the oxidation of any element are called _oxides_. thus in the combustion of sulphur, phosphorus, and iron, the compounds formed are called respectively oxide of sulphur, oxide of phosphorus, and oxide of iron. in general, then, _an oxide is a compound of oxygen with another element_. a great many substances of this class are known; in fact, the oxides of all the common elements have been prepared, with the exception of those of fluorine and bromine. some of these are familiar compounds. water, for example, is an oxide of hydrogen, and lime an oxide of the metal calcium. ~products of combustion.~ the particular oxides formed by the combustion of any substance are called _products of combustion_ of that substance. thus oxide of sulphur is the product of the combustion of sulphur; oxide of iron is the product of the combustion of iron. it is evident that the products of the combustion of any substance must weigh more than the original substance, the increase in weight corresponding to the amount of oxygen taken up in the act of combustion. for example, when iron burns the oxide of iron formed weighs more than the original iron. in some cases the products of combustion are invisible gases, so that the substance undergoing combustion is apparently destroyed. thus, when a candle burns it is consumed, and so far as the eye can judge nothing is formed during combustion. that invisible gases are formed, however, and that the weight of these is greater than the weight of the candle may be shown by the following experiment. [illustration: fig. ] a lamp chimney is filled with sticks of the compound known as sodium hydroxide (caustic soda), and suspended from the beam of the balance, as shown in fig. . a piece of candle is placed on the balance pan so that the wick comes just below the chimney, and the balance is brought to a level by adding weights to the other pan. the candle is then lighted. the products formed pass up through the chimney and are absorbed by the sodium hydroxide. although the candle burns away, the pan upon which it rests slowly sinks, showing that the combustion is attended by an increase in weight. ~combustion in air and in oxygen.~ combustion in air and in oxygen differs only in rapidity, the products formed being exactly the same. that the process should take place less rapidly in the former is readily understood, for the air is only about one fifth oxygen, the remaining four fifths being inert gases. not only is less oxygen available, but much of the heat is absorbed in raising the temperature of the inert gases surrounding the substance undergoing combustion, and the temperature reached in the combustion is therefore less. ~phlogiston theory of combustion.~ the french chemist lavoisier ( - ), who gave to oxygen its name was the first to show that combustion is due to union with oxygen. previous to his time combustion was supposed to be due to the presence of a substance or principle called _phlogiston_. one substance was thought to be more combustible than another because it contained more phlogiston. coal, for example, was thought to be very rich in phlogiston. the ashes left after combustion would not burn because all the phlogiston had escaped. if the phlogiston could be restored in any way, the substance would then become combustible again. although this view seems absurd to us in the light of our present knowledge, it formerly had general acceptance. the discovery of oxygen led lavoisier to investigate the subject, and through his experiments he arrived at the true explanation of combustion. the discovery of oxygen together with the part it plays in combustion is generally regarded as the most important discovery in the history of chemistry. it marked the dawn of a new period in the growth of the science. ~combustion in the broad sense.~ according to the definition given above, the presence of oxygen is necessary for combustion. the term is sometimes used, however, in a broader sense to designate any chemical change attended by the evolution of heat and light. thus iron and sulphur, or hydrogen and chlorine under certain conditions, will combine so rapidly that light is evolved, and the action is called a combustion. whenever combustion takes place in the air, however, the process is one of oxidation. ~spontaneous combustion.~ the temperature reached in a given chemical action, such as oxidation, depends upon the rate at which the reaction takes place. this rate is usually increased by raising the temperature of the substances taking part in the action. when a slow oxidation takes place under such conditions that the heat generated is not lost by being conducted away, the temperature of the substance undergoing oxidation is raised, and this in turn hastens the rate of oxidation. the rise in temperature may continue in this way until the kindling temperature of the substance is reached, when combustion begins. combustion occurring in this way is called _spontaneous combustion_. certain oils, such as the linseed oil used in paints, slowly undergo oxidation at ordinary temperatures, and not infrequently the origin of fires has been traced to the spontaneous combustion of oily rags. the spontaneous combustion of hay has been known to set barns on fire. heaps of coal have been found to be on fire when spontaneous combustion offered the only possible explanation. ~importance of oxygen.~ . oxygen is essential to life. among living organisms only certain minute forms of plant life can exist without it. in the process of respiration the air is taken into the lungs where a certain amount of oxygen is absorbed by the blood. it is then carried to all parts of the body, oxidizing the worn-out tissues and changing them into substances which may readily be eliminated from the body. the heat generated by this oxidation is the source of the heat of the body. the small amount of oxygen which water dissolves from the air supports all the varied forms of aquatic animals. . oxygen is also essential to decay. the process of decay is really a kind of oxidation, but it will only take place in the presence of certain minute forms of life known as bacteria. just how these assist in the oxidation is not known. by this process the dead products of animal and vegetable life which collect on the surface of the earth are slowly oxidized and so converted into harmless substances. in this way oxygen acts as a great purifying agent. . oxygen is also used in the treatment of certain diseases in which the patient is unable to inhale sufficient air to supply the necessary amount of oxygen. ozone ~preparation.~ when electric sparks are passed through oxygen or air a small percentage of the oxygen is converted into a substance called _ozone_, which differs greatly from oxygen in its properties. the same change can also be brought about by certain chemical processes. thus, if some pieces of phosphorus are placed in a bottle and partially covered with water, the presence of ozone may soon be detected in the air contained in the bottle. the conversion of oxygen into ozone is attended by a change in volume, volumes of oxygen forming volumes of ozone. if the resulting ozone is heated to about °, the reverse change takes place, the volumes of ozone being changed back into volumes of oxygen. it is possible that traces of ozone exist in the atmosphere, although its presence there has not been definitely proved, the tests formerly used for its detection having been shown to be unreliable. ~properties.~ as commonly prepared, ozone is mixed with a large excess of oxygen. it is possible, however, to separate the ozone and thus obtain it in pure form. the gas so obtained has the characteristic odor noticed about electrical machines when in operation. by subjecting it to great pressure and a low temperature, the gas condenses to a bluish liquid, boiling at - °. when unmixed with other gases ozone is very explosive, changing back into oxygen with the liberation of heat. its chemical properties are similar to those of oxygen except that it is far more active. air or oxygen containing a small amount of ozone is now used in place of oxygen in certain manufacturing processes. ~the difference between oxygen and ozone.~ experiments show that in changing oxygen into ozone no other kind of matter is either added to the oxygen or withdrawn from it. the question arises then, how can we account for the difference in their properties? it must be remembered that in all changes we have to take into account _energy_ as well as _matter_. by changing the amount of energy in a substance we change its properties. that oxygen and ozone contain different amounts of energy may be shown in a number of ways; for example, by the fact that the conversion of ozone into oxygen is attended by the liberation of heat. the passage of the electric sparks through oxygen has in some way changed the energy content of the element and thus it has acquired new properties. _oxygen and ozone must, therefore, be regarded as identical so far as the kind of matter of which they are composed is concerned. their different properties are due to their different energy contents._ ~allotropic states or forms of matter.~ other elements besides oxygen may exist in more than one form. these different forms of the same element are called _allotropic states_ or _forms_ of the element. these forms differ not only in physical properties but also in their energy contents. elements often exist in a variety of forms which look quite different. these differences may be due to accidental causes, such as the size or shape of the particles or the way in which the element was prepared. only such forms, however, as have different energy contents are properly called allotropic forms. measurement of gas volumes ~standard conditions.~ it is a well-known fact that the volume occupied by a definite weight of any gas can be altered by changing the temperature of the gas or the pressure to which it is subjected. in measuring the volume of gases it is therefore necessary, for the sake of accuracy, to adopt some standard conditions of temperature and pressure. the conditions agreed upon are ( ) a temperature of °, and ( ) a pressure equal to the average pressure exerted by the atmosphere at the sea level, that is, . g. per square centimeter. these conditions of temperature and pressure are known as the _standard conditions_, and when the volume of a gas is given it is understood that the measurement was made under these conditions, unless it is expressly stated otherwise. for example, the weight of a liter of oxygen has been given as . g. this means that one liter of oxygen, measured at a temperature of ° and under a pressure of . g. per square centimeter, weighs . g. the conditions which prevail in the laboratory are never the standard conditions. it becomes necessary, therefore, to find a way to calculate the volume which a gas will occupy under standard conditions from the volume which it occupies under any other conditions. this may be done in accordance with the following laws. ~law of charles.~ this law expresses the effect which a change in the temperature of a gas has upon its volume. it may be stated as follows: _for every degree the temperature of a gas rises above zero the volume of the gas is increased by / of the volume which it occupies at zero; likewise for every degree the temperature of the gas falls below zero the volume of the gas is decreased by / of the volume which it occupies at zero, provided in both cases that the pressure to which the gas is subjected remains constant._ if v represents the volume of gas at °, then the volume at ° will be v + / v; at ° it will be v + / v; or, in general, the volume v, at the temperature t, will be expressed by the formula ( ) v = v + t/ v, or ( ) v = v( + (t/ )). since / = . , the formula may be written ( ) v = v( + . t). since the value of v (volume under standard conditions) is the one usually sought, it is convenient to transpose the equation to the following form: ( ) v = v/( + . t). the following problem will serve as an illustration of the application of this equation. the volume of a gas at ° is cc.; find the volume it will occupy at °, the pressure remaining constant. in this case, v = cc. and t = . by substituting these values, equation ( ) becomes v = /( + . × ) = . cc. ~law of boyle.~ this law expresses the relation between the volume occupied by a gas and the pressure to which it is subjected. it may be stated as follows: _the volume of a gas is inversely proportional to the pressure under which it is measured, provided the temperature of the gas remains constant._ if v represents the volume when subjected to a pressure p and v represents its volume when the pressure is changed to p, then, in accordance with the above law, v : v :: p : p, or vp = vp. in other words, for a given weight of a gas the product of the numbers representing its volume and the pressure to which it is subjected is a constant. since the pressure of the atmosphere at any point is indicated by the barometric reading, it is convenient in the solution of the problems to substitute the latter for the pressure measured in grams per square centimeter. the average reading of the barometer at the sea level is mm., which corresponds to a pressure of . g. per square centimeter. the following problem will serve as an illustration of the application of boyle's law. a gas occupies a volume of cc. in a laboratory where the barometric reading is mm. what volume would it occupy if the atmospheric pressure changed so that the reading became mm.? substituting the values in the equation vp = vp, we have × = v × , or v = . cc. ~variations in the volume of a gas due to changes both in temperature and pressure.~ inasmuch as corrections must be made as a rule for both temperature and pressure, it is convenient to combine the equations given above for the corrections for each, so that the two corrections may be made in one operation. the following equation is thus obtained: ( ) v_{s} = vp/( ( + . t)), in which v_{s} represents the volume of a gas under standard conditions and v, p, and t the volume, pressure, and temperature respectively at which the gas was actually measured. the following problem will serve to illustrate the application of this equation. a gas having a temperature of ° occupies a volume of cc. when subjected to a pressure indicated by a barometric reading of mm. what volume would this gas occupy under standard conditions? in this problem v = , p = , and t = . substituting these values in the above equation, we get v_{s} = ( × )/( ( + . × )) = . cc. [illustration: fig. ] ~variations in the volume of a gas due to the pressure of aqueous vapor.~ in many cases gases are collected over water, as explained under the preparation of oxygen. in such cases there is present in the gas a certain amount of water vapor. this vapor exerts a definite pressure, which acts in opposition to the atmospheric pressure and which therefore must be subtracted from the latter in determining the effective pressure upon the gas. thus, suppose we wish to determine the pressure to which the gas in tube a (fig. ) is subjected. the tube is raised or lowered until the level of the water inside and outside the tube is the same. the atmosphere presses down upon the surface of the water (as indicated by the arrows), thus forcing the water upward within the tube with a pressure equal to the atmospheric pressure. the full force of this upward pressure, however, is not spent in compressing the gas within the tube, for since it is collected over water it contains a certain amount of water vapor. this water vapor exerts a pressure (as indicated by the arrow within the tube) in opposition to the upward pressure. it is plain, therefore, that the effective pressure upon the gas is equal to the atmospheric pressure less the pressure exerted by the aqueous vapor. the pressure exerted by the aqueous vapor increases with the temperature. the figures representing the extent of this pressure (often called the _tension of aqueous vapor_) are given in the appendix. they express the pressure or tension in millimeters of mercury, just as the atmospheric pressure is expressed in millimeters of mercury. representing the pressure of the aqueous vapor by a, formula ( ) becomes ( ) v_{s} = v(p - a)/( ( + . t)). the following problem will serve to illustrate the method of applying the correction for the pressure of the aqueous vapor. the volume of a gas measured over water in a laboratory where the temperature is ° and the barometric reading is mm. is cc. what volume would this occupy under standard conditions? the pressure exerted by the aqueous vapor at ° (see table in appendix) is equal to the pressure exerted by a column of mercury . mm. in height. substituting the values of v, t, p, and a in formula ( ), we have ( ) v_{s} = ( - . )/( ( + . × )) = . cc. ~adjustment of tubes before reading gas volumes.~ in measuring the volumes of gases collected in graduated tubes or other receivers, over a liquid as illustrated in fig. , the reading should be taken after raising or lowering the tube containing the gas until the level of the liquid inside and outside the tube is the same; for it is only under these conditions that the upward pressure within the tube is the same as the atmospheric pressure. exercises . what is the meaning of the following words? phlogiston, ozone, phosphorus. (consult dictionary.) . can combustion take place without the emission of light? . is the evolution of light always produced by combustion? . (a) what weight of oxygen can be obtained from g. of water? (b) what volume would this occupy under standard conditions? . (a) what weight of oxygen can be obtained from g. of mercuric oxide? (b) what volume would this occupy under standard conditions? . what weight of each of the following compounds is necessary to prepare l. of oxygen? (a) water; (b) mercuric oxide; (c) potassium chlorate. . reduce the following volumes to °, the pressure remaining constant: (a) cc. at °; (b) cc. at °. . a certain volume of gas is measured when the temperature is °. at what temperature will its volume be doubled? . reduce the following volumes to standard conditions of pressure, the temperature remaining constant: (a) cc. at mm.; (b) l. at mm. . what is the weight of l. of oxygen when the pressure is mm. and the temperature °? . reduce the following volumes to standard conditions of temperature and pressure: (a) cc. at ° and mm; (b) cc. at ° and mm. . what weight of potassium chlorate is necessary to prepare l. of oxygen at ° and mm.? . assuming the cost of potassium chlorate and mercuric oxide to be respectively $ . and $ . per kilogram, calculate the cost of materials necessary for the preparation of l. of oxygen from each of the above compounds. . g. of potassium chlorate and g. of manganese dioxide were heated in the preparation of oxygen. what products were left in the flask, and how much of each was present? chapter iii hydrogen ~historical.~ the element hydrogen was first clearly recognized as a distinct substance by the english investigator cavendish, who in obtained it in a pure state, and showed it to be different from the other inflammable airs or gases which had long been known. lavoisier gave it the name hydrogen, signifying water former, since it had been found to be a constituent of water. ~occurrence.~ in the free state hydrogen is found in the atmosphere, but only in traces. in the combined state it is widely distributed, being a constituent of water as well as of all living organisms, and the products derived from them, such as starch and sugar. about % of the human body is hydrogen. combined with carbon, it forms the substances which constitute petroleum and natural gas. it is an interesting fact that while hydrogen in the free state occurs only in traces on the earth, it occurs in enormous quantities in the gaseous matter surrounding the sun and certain other stars. ~preparation from water.~ hydrogen can be prepared from water by several methods, the most important of which are the following. . _by the electric current._ as has been indicated in the preparation of oxygen, water is easily separated into its constituents, hydrogen and oxygen, by passing an electric current through it under certain conditions. . _by the action of certain metals._ when brought into contact with certain metals under appropriate conditions, water gives up a portion or the whole of its hydrogen, its place being taken by the metal. in the case of a few of the metals this change occurs at ordinary temperatures. thus, if a bit of sodium is thrown on water, an action is seen to take place at once, sufficient heat being generated to melt the sodium, which runs about on the surface of the water. the change which takes place consists in the displacement of one half of the hydrogen of the water by the sodium, and may be represented as follows: _ _ _ _ | hydrogen | | sodium | sodium + | hydrogen |(water) = | hydrogen |(sodium hydroxide) + hydrogen |_oxygen _| |_oxygen _| the sodium hydroxide formed is a white solid which remains dissolved in the undecomposed water, and may be obtained by evaporating the solution to dryness. the hydrogen is evolved as a gas and may be collected by suitable apparatus. other metals, such as magnesium and iron, decompose water rapidly, but only at higher temperatures. when steam is passed over hot iron, for example, the iron combines with the oxygen of the steam, thus displacing the hydrogen. experiments show that the change may be represented as follows: _ _ | hydrogen | _ _ _ _ iron + | hydrogen |(water) = | iron |(iron oxide) + | hydrogen | |_oxygen _| |_oxygen _| |_hydrogen_| the iron oxide formed is a reddish-black compound, identical with that obtained by the combustion of iron in oxygen. ~directions for preparing hydrogen by the action of steam on iron.~ the apparatus used in the preparation of hydrogen from iron and steam is shown in fig. . a porcelain or iron tube b, about cm. in length and cm. or cm. in diameter, is partially filled with fine iron wire or tacks and connected as shown in the figure. the tube b is heated, slowly at first, until the iron is red-hot. steam is then conducted through the tube by boiling the water in the flask a. the hot iron combines with the oxygen in the steam, setting free the hydrogen, which is collected over water. the gas which first passes over is mixed with the air previously contained in the flask and tube, and is allowed to escape, _since a mixture of hydrogen with oxygen or air explodes violently when brought in contact with a flame_. it is evident that the flask a must be disconnected from the tube before the heat is withdrawn. that the gas obtained is different from air and oxygen may be shown by holding a bottle of it mouth downward and bringing a lighted splint into it. the hydrogen is ignited and burns with an almost colorless flame. [illustration fig. ] ~preparation from acids~ (_usual laboratory method_). while hydrogen can be prepared from water, either by the action of the electric current or by the action of certain metals, these methods are not economical and are therefore but little used. in the laboratory hydrogen is generally prepared from compounds known as acids, all of which contain hydrogen. when acids are brought in contact with certain metals, the metals dissolve and set free the hydrogen of the acid. although this reaction is a quite general one, it has been found most convenient in preparing hydrogen by this method to use either zinc or iron as the metal and either hydrochloric or sulphuric acid as the acid. hydrochloric acid is a compound consisting of . % hydrogen and . % chlorine, while sulphuric acid consists of . % hydrogen, . % sulphur, and . % oxygen. the changes which take place in the preparation of hydrogen from zinc and sulphuric acid (diluted with water) may be represented as follows: _ _ _ _ | hydrogen |(sulphuric | zinc |(zinc zinc + | sulphur | acid) = | sulphur | sulphate) + hydrogen |_oxygen _| |_oxygen _| in other words, the zinc has taken the place of the hydrogen in sulphuric acid. the resulting compound contains zinc, sulphur, and oxygen, and is known as zinc sulphate. this remains dissolved in the water present in the acid. it may be obtained in the form of a white solid by evaporating the liquid left after the metal has passed into solution. when zinc and hydrochloric acid are used the following changes take place: _ _ _ _ | hydrogen |(hydrochloric | zinc |(zinc zinc + |_chlorine_| acid) = |_chlorine_| chloride) + hydrogen when iron is used the changes which take place are exactly similar to those just given for zinc. [illustration fig. .] ~directions for preparing hydrogen from acids.~ the preparation of hydrogen from acids is carried out in the laboratory as follows: the metal is placed in a flask or wide-mouthed bottle a (fig. ) and the acid is added slowly through the funnel tube b. the metal dissolves in the acid, while the hydrogen which is liberated escapes through the exit tube c and is collected over water. it is evident that the hydrogen which passes over first is mixed with the air from the bottle a. hence care must be taken not to bring a flame near the exit tube, since, as has been stated previously, such a mixture explodes with great violence when brought in contact with a flame. ~precautions.~ both sulphuric acid and zinc, if impure, are likely to contain small amounts of arsenic. such materials should not be used in preparing hydrogen, since the arsenic present combines with a portion of the hydrogen to form a very poisonous gas known as arsine. on the other hand, chemically pure sulphuric acid, i.e. sulphuric acid that is entirely free from impurities, will not act upon chemically pure zinc. the reaction may be started, however, by the addition of a few drops of a solution of copper sulphate or platinum tetrachloride. ~physical properties.~ hydrogen is similar to oxygen in that it is a colorless, tasteless, odorless gas. it is characterized by its extreme lightness, being the lightest of all known substances. one liter of the gas weighs only . g. on comparing this weight with that of an equal volume of oxygen, viz., . g., the latter is found to be . times as heavy as hydrogen. similarly, air is found to be . times as heavy as hydrogen. soap bubbles blown with hydrogen rapidly rise in the air. on account of its lightness it is possible to pour it upward from one bottle into another. thus, if the bottle a (fig. ) is filled with hydrogen, placed mouth downward by the side of bottle _b_, filled with air, and is then gradually inverted under b as indicated in the figure, the hydrogen will flow upward into bottle _b_, displacing the air. its presence in bottle b may then be shown by bringing a lighted splint to the mouth of the bottle, when the hydrogen will be ignited by the flame. it is evident, from this experiment, that in order to retain the gas in an open bottle the bottle must be placed mouth downward. [illustration fig. ] hydrogen is far more difficult to liquefy than any other gas, with the exception of helium, a rare element recently found to exist in the atmosphere. the english scientist dewar, however, in succeeded not only in obtaining hydrogen in liquid state but also as a solid. liquid hydrogen is colorless and has a density of only . . its boiling point under atmospheric pressure is - °. under diminished pressure the temperature has been reduced to - °. the solubility of hydrogen in water is very slight, being still less than that of oxygen. pure hydrogen produces no injurious results when inhaled. of course one could not live in an atmosphere of the gas, since oxygen is essential to respiration. ~chemical properties.~ at ordinary temperatures hydrogen is not an active element. a mixture of hydrogen and chlorine, however, will combine with explosive violence at ordinary temperature if exposed to the sunlight. the union can be brought about also by heating. the product formed in either case is hydrochloric acid. under suitable conditions hydrogen combines with nitrogen to form ammonia, and with sulphur to form the foul-smelling gas, hydrogen sulphide. the affinity of hydrogen for oxygen is so great that a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen or hydrogen and air explodes with great violence when heated to the kindling temperature (about °). nevertheless under proper conditions hydrogen may be made to burn quietly in either oxygen or air. the resulting hydrogen flame is almost colorless and is very hot. the combustion of the hydrogen is, of course, due to its union with oxygen. the product of the combustion is therefore a compound of hydrogen and oxygen. that this compound is water may be shown easily by experiment. [illustration fig. ] ~directions for burning hydrogen in air.~ the combustion of hydrogen in air may be carried out safely as follows: the hydrogen is generated in the bottle a (fig. ), is dried by conducting it through the tube x, filled with some substance (generally calcium chloride) which has a great attraction for moisture, and escapes through the tube t, the end of which is drawn out to a jet. the hydrogen first liberated mixes with the air contained in the generator. if a flame is brought near the jet before this mixture has all escaped, a violent and very dangerous explosion results, since the entire apparatus is filled with the explosive mixture. on the other hand, if the flame is not applied until all the air has been expelled, the hydrogen is ignited and burns quietly, since only the small amount of it which escapes from the jet can come in contact with the oxygen of the air at any one time. by holding a cold, dry bell jar or bottle over the flame, in the manner shown in the figure, the steam formed by the combustion of the hydrogen is condensed, the water collecting in drops on the sides of the jar. ~precautions.~ in order to avoid danger it is absolutely necessary to prove that the hydrogen is free from air before igniting it. this can be done by testing small amounts of the escaping gas. a convenient and safe method of doing this is to fill a test tube with the gas by inverting it over the jet. the hydrogen, on account of its lightness, collects in the tube, displacing the air. after holding it over the jet for a few moments in order that it may be filled with the gas, the tube is gently brought, mouth downward, to the flame of a burner placed not nearer than an arm's length from the jet. if the hydrogen is mixed with air a slight explosion occurs, but if pure it burns quietly in the tube. the operation is repeated until the gas burns quietly, when the tube is quickly brought back over the jet for an instant, whereby the escaping hydrogen is ignited by the flame in the tube. [illustration. fig. ] ~a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen is explosive.~ that a mixture of hydrogen and air is explosive may be shown safely as follows: a cork through which passes a short glass tube about cm. in diameter is fitted air-tight into the tubule of a bell jar of l. or l. capacity. (a thick glass bottle with bottom removed may be used.) the tube is closed with a small rubber stopper and the bell jar filled with hydrogen, the gas being collected over water. when entirely filled with the gas the jar is removed from the water and supported by blocks of wood in order to leave the bottom of the jar open, as shown in fig. . the stopper is now removed from the tube in the cork, and the hydrogen, which on account of its lightness escapes from the tube, is at once lighted. as the hydrogen escapes, the air flows in at the bottom of the jar and mixes with the remaining portion of the hydrogen, so that a mixture of the two soon forms, and a loud explosion results. the explosion is not dangerous, since the bottom of the jar is open, thus leaving room for the expansion of the hot gas. since air is only one fifth oxygen, the remainder being inert gases, it may readily be inferred that a mixture of hydrogen with pure oxygen would be far more explosive than a mixture of hydrogen with air. such mixtures should not be made except in small quantities and by experienced workers. ~hydrogen does not support combustion.~ while hydrogen is readily combustible, it is not a supporter of combustion. in other words, substances will not burn in it. this may be shown by bringing a lighted candle supported by a stiff wire into a bottle or cylinder of the pure gas, as shown in fig. . the hydrogen is ignited by the flame of the candle and burns at the mouth of the bottle, where it comes in contact with the oxygen in the air. when the candle is thrust up into the gas, its flame is extinguished on account of the absence of oxygen. if slowly withdrawn, the candle is relighted as it passes through the layer of burning hydrogen. [illustration: fig. ] [illustration: fig. ] ~reduction.~ on account of its great affinity for oxygen, hydrogen has the power of abstracting it from many of its compounds. thus, if a stream of hydrogen, dried by passing through the tube b (fig. ), filled with calcium chloride, is conducted through the tube c containing some copper oxide, heated to a moderate temperature, the hydrogen abstracts the oxygen from the copper oxide. the change may be represented as follows: hydrogen + {copper} {hydrogen} {oxygen}(copper oxide) = {oxygen }(water) + copper the water formed collects in the cold portions of the tube c near its end. in this experiment the copper oxide is said to undergo reduction. _reduction may therefore be defined as the process of withdrawing oxygen from a compound._ ~relation of reduction to oxidation.~ at the same time that the copper oxide is reduced it is clear that the hydrogen is oxidized, for it combines with the oxygen given up by the copper oxide. the two processes are therefore very closely related, and it usually happens that when one substance is oxidized some other substance is reduced. that substance which gives up its oxygen is called an _oxidizing agent_, while the substance which unites with the oxygen is called a _reducing agent_. ~the oxyhydrogen blowpipe.~ this is a form of apparatus used for burning hydrogen in pure oxygen. as has been previously stated, the flame produced by the combustion of hydrogen in the air is very hot. it is evident that if pure oxygen is substituted for air, the temperature reached will be much higher, since there are no inert gases to absorb the heat. the oxyhydrogen blowpipe, used to effect this combination, consists of a small tube placed within a larger one, as shown in fig. . [illustration: fig. ] the hydrogen, stored under pressure, generally in steel cylinders, is first passed through the outer tube and ignited at the open end of the tube. the oxygen from a similar cylinder is then conducted through the inner tube, and mixes with the hydrogen at the end of the tube. in order to produce the maximum heat, the hydrogen and oxygen must be admitted to the blowpipe in the exact proportion in which they combine, viz., volumes of hydrogen to of oxygen, or by weight, part of hydrogen to . parts of oxygen. the intensity of the heat may be shown by bringing into the flame pieces of metal such as iron wire or zinc. these burn with great brilliancy. even platinum, having a melting point of °, may be melted by the heat of the flame. while the oxyhydrogen flame is intensely hot, it is almost non-luminous. if directed against some infusible substance like ordinary lime (calcium oxide), the heat is so intense that the lime becomes incandescent and glows with a brilliant light. this is sometimes used as a source of light, under the name of _drummond_ or _lime light_. [illustration: fig. ] ~the blast lamp.~ a similar form of apparatus is commonly used in the laboratory as a source of heat under the name _blast lamp_ (fig. ). this differs from the oxyhydrogen blowpipe only in the size of the tubes. in place of the hydrogen and oxygen the more accessible coal gas and air are respectively used. the former is composed largely of a mixture of free hydrogen and gaseous compounds of carbon and hydrogen. while the temperature of the flame is not so high as that of the oxyhydrogen blowpipe, it nevertheless suffices for most chemical operations carried out in the laboratory. ~uses of hydrogen.~ on account of its cost, hydrogen is but little used for commercial purposes. it is sometimes used as a material for the inflation of balloons, but usually the much cheaper coal gas is substituted for it. even hot air is often used when the duration of ascension is very short. it has been used also as a source of heat and light in the oxyhydrogen blowpipe. where the electric current is available, however, this form of apparatus has been displaced almost entirely by the electric light and electric furnace, which are much more economical and more powerful sources of light and heat. exercises . will a definite weight of iron decompose an unlimited weight of steam? . why is oxygen passed through the inner tube of the oxyhydrogen blowpipe rather than the outer? . in fig. , will the flame remain at the mouth of the tube? . from fig. , suggest a way for determining experimentally the quantity of water formed in the reaction. . distinguish clearly between the following terms: oxidation, reduction, combustion, and kindling temperature. . is oxidation always accompanied by reduction? . what is the source of heat in the lime light? what is the exact use of lime in this instrument? . in fig. , why is it necessary to dry the hydrogen by means of the calcium chloride in the tube x? . at what pressure would the weight of l. of hydrogen be equal to that of oxygen under standard conditions? . (a) what weight of hydrogen can be obtained from g. of sulphuric acid? (b) what volume would this occupy under standard conditions? (c) the density of sulphuric acid is . . what volume would the g. of the acid occupy? . how many liters of hydrogen can be obtained from cc. of sulphuric acid having a density of . ? . suppose you wish to fill five liter bottles with hydrogen, the gas to be collected over water in your laboratory, how many cubic centimeters of sulphuric acid would be required? chapter iv compounds of hydrogen and oxygen; water and hydrogen dioxide water ~historical.~ water was long regarded as an element. in cavendish showed that it is formed by the union of hydrogen and oxygen. being a believer in the phlogiston theory, however, he failed to interpret his results correctly. a few years later lavoisier repeated cavendish's experiments and showed that water must be regarded as a compound of hydrogen and oxygen. ~general methods employed for the determination of the composition of a compound.~ the composition of a compound may be determined by either of two general processes these are known as _analysis_ and _synthesis_. . _analysis_ is the process of decomposing a compound into its constituents and determining what these constituents are. the analysis is _qualitative_ when it results in merely determining what elements compose the compound; it is _quantitative_ when the exact percentage of each constituent is determined. qualitative analysis must therefore precede quantitative analysis, for it must be known what elements, are in a compound before a method can be devised for determining exactly how much of each is present. . _synthesis_ is the process of forming a compound from its constituent parts. it is therefore the reverse of analysis. like analysis, it may be either qualitative or quantitative. ~application of these methods to the determination of the composition of water.~ the determination of the composition of water is a matter of great interest not only because of the importance of the compound but also because the methods employed illustrate the general methods of analysis and synthesis. ~methods based on analysis.~ the methods based on analysis may be either qualitative or quantitative in character. [illustration: fig. ] . _qualitative analysis._ as was stated in the study of oxygen, water may be separated into its component parts by means of the electric current. the form of apparatus ordinarily used for effecting this analysis is shown in fig. . a platinum wire, to the end of which is attached a small piece of platinum foil (about mm. by mm.), is fused through each of the tubes b and d, as shown in the figure. the stopcocks at the ends of these tubes are opened and water, to which has been added about one tenth of its volume of sulphuric acid, is poured into the tube a until the side tubes b and d are completely filled. the stopcocks are then closed. the platinum wires extending into the tubes b and d are now connected with the wires leading from two or three dichromate cells joined in series. the pieces of platinum foil within the tubes thus become the electrodes, and the current flows from one to the other through the acidulated water. as soon as the current passes, bubbles of gas rise from each of the electrodes and collect in the upper part of the tubes. the gas rising from the negative electrode is found to be hydrogen, while that from the positive electrode is oxygen. it will be seen that the volume of the hydrogen is approximately double that of the oxygen. oxygen is more soluble in water than hydrogen, and a very little of it is also lost by being converted into ozone and other substances. it has been found that when the necessary corrections are made for the error due to these facts, the volume of the hydrogen is exactly double that of the oxygen. fig. illustrates a simpler form of apparatus, which may be used in place of that shown in fig. . a glass or porcelain dish is partially filled with water to which has been added the proper amount of acid. two tubes filled with the same liquid are inverted over the electrodes. the gases resulting from the decomposition of the water collect in the tubes. [illustration: fig. ] . _quantitative analysis._ the analysis just described is purely qualitative and simply shows that water contains hydrogen and oxygen. it does not prove the absence of other elements; indeed it does not prove that the hydrogen and oxygen are present in the proportion in which they are liberated by the electric current. the method may be made quantitative, however, by weighing the water decomposed and also the hydrogen and oxygen obtained in its decomposition. if the combined weights of the hydrogen and oxygen exactly equal the weight of the water decomposed, then it would be proved that the water consists of hydrogen and oxygen in the proportion in which they are liberated by the electric current. this experiment is difficult to carry out, however, so that the more accurate methods based on synthesis are used. ~methods based on synthesis.~ two steps are necessary to ascertain the exact composition of water by synthesis: ( ) to show by qualitative synthesis that water is formed by the union of oxygen with hydrogen; ( ) to determine by quantitative synthesis in what proportion the two elements unite to form water. the fact that water is formed by the combination of oxygen with hydrogen was proved in the preceding chapter. the quantitative synthesis may be made as follows: [illustration: fig. ] the combination of the two gases is brought about in a tube called a eudiometer. this is a graduated tube about cm. long and cm. wide, closed at one end (fig. ). near the closed end two platinum wires are fused through the glass, the ends of the wires within the tube being separated by a space of mm or mm. the tube is entirely filled with mercury and inverted in a vessel of the same liquid. pure hydrogen is passed into the tube until it is about one fourth filled. the volume of the gas is then read off on the scale and reduced to standard conditions. approximately an equal volume of pure oxygen is then introduced and the volume again read off and reduced to standard conditions. this gives the total volume of the two gases. from this the volume of the oxygen introduced may be determined by subtracting from it the volume of the hydrogen. the combination of the two gases is now brought about by connecting the two platinum wires with an induction coil and passing a spark from one wire to the other. immediately a slight explosion occurs. the mercury in the tube is at first depressed because of the expansion of the gases due to the heat generated, but at once rebounds, taking the place of the gases which have combined to form water. the volume of the water in the liquid state is so small that it may be disregarded in the calculations. in order that the temperature of the residual gas and the mercury may become uniform, the apparatus is allowed to stand for a few minutes. the volume of the gas is then read off and reduced to standard conditions, so that it may be compared with the volumes of the hydrogen and oxygen originally taken. the residual gas is then tested in order to ascertain whether it is hydrogen or oxygen, experiments having proved that it is never a mixture of the two. from the information thus obtained the composition of the water may be calculated. thus, suppose the readings were as follows: volume of hydrogen taken . cc. volume of hydrogen and oxygen . volume of oxygen . volume of gas left after combination has taken place (oxygen) . the . cc. of hydrogen have combined with . cc. minus . cc. (or . cc.) of oxygen; or approximately volumes of hydrogen have combined with of oxygen. since oxygen is . times as heavy as hydrogen, the proportion by weight in which the two gases combine is part of hydrogen to . of oxygen. ~precaution.~ if the two gases are introduced into the eudiometer in the exact proportions in which they combine, after the combination has taken place the liquid will rise and completely fill the tube. under these conditions, however, the tube is very likely to be broken by the sudden upward rush of the liquid. hence in performing the experiment care is taken to introduce an excess of one of the gases. ~a more convenient form of eudiometer.~ a form of eudiometer (fig. ) different from that shown on page is sometimes used to avoid the calculations necessary in reducing the volumes of the gases to the same conditions of temperature and pressure in order to make comparisons. with this apparatus it is possible to take the readings of the volumes under the same conditions of temperature and pressure, and thus compare them directly. the apparatus (fig. ) is filled with mercury and the gases introduced into the tube a. the experiment is carried out as in the preceding one, except that before taking the reading of the gas volumes, mercury is either added to the tube b or withdrawn from it by means of the stopcock c, until it stands at exactly the same height in both tubes. the gas inclosed in tube a is then under atmospheric pressure; and since but a few minutes are required for performing the experiment, the conditions of temperature and pressure may be regarded as constant. hence the volumes of the hydrogen and oxygen and of the residual gas may be read off from the tube and directly compared. [illustration: fig. ] ~method used by berzelius and dumas.~ the method used by these investigators enables us to determine directly the proportion by weight in which the hydrogen and oxygen combine. fig. illustrates the apparatus used in making this determination. b is a glass tube containing copper oxide. c and d are glass tubes filled with calcium chloride, a substance which has great affinity for water. the tubes b and c, including their contents, are carefully weighed, and the apparatus connected as shown in the figure. a slow current of pure hydrogen is then passed through a, and that part of the tube b which contains copper oxide is carefully heated. the hydrogen combines with the oxygen present in the copper oxide to form water, which is absorbed by the calcium chloride in tube c. the calcium chloride in tube d prevents any moisture entering tube c from the air. the operation is continued until an appreciable amount of water has been formed. the tubes b and c are then weighed once more. the loss of weight in the tube b will exactly equal the weight of oxygen taken up from the copper oxide in the formation of the water. the gain in weight in the tube c will exactly equal the weight of the water formed. the difference in these weights will of course equal the weight of the hydrogen present in the water formed. [illustration: fig. ] ~dumas' results.~ the above method for the determination of the composition of water was first used by berzelius in . the work was repeated in by dumas, the average of whose results is as follows: weight of water formed . g. oxygen given up by the copper oxide . ------ weight of hydrogen present in water . according to this experiment the ratio of hydrogen to oxygen in water is therefore . to . , or as l to . ~morley's results.~ the american chemist morley has recently determined the composition of water, extreme precautions being taken to use pure materials and to eliminate all sources of error. the hydrogen and oxygen which combined, as well as the water formed, were all accurately weighed. according to morley's results, part of hydrogen by weight combines with . parts of oxygen to form water. ~comparison of results obtained.~ from the above discussions it is easy to see that it is by experiment alone that the composition of a compound can be determined. different methods may lead to slightly different results. the more accurate the method chosen and the greater the skill with which the experiment is carried out, the more accurate will be the results. it is generally conceded by chemists that the results obtained by morley in reference to the composition of water are the most accurate ones. in accordance with these results, then, _water must be regarded as a compound containing hydrogen and oxygen in the proportion of part by weight of hydrogen to . parts by weight of oxygen_. ~relation between the volume of aqueous vapor and the volumes of the hydrogen and oxygen which combine to form it.~ when the quantitative synthesis of water is carried out in the eudiometer as described above, the water vapor formed by the union of the hydrogen and oxygen at once condenses. the volume of the resulting liquid is so small that it may be disregarded in making the calculations. if, however, the experiment is carried out at a temperature of ° or above, the water-vapor formed is not condensed and it thus becomes possible to compare the volume of the vapor with the volumes of hydrogen and oxygen which combined to form it. this can be accomplished by surrounding the arm a of the eudiometer (fig. ) with the tube b through which is passed the vapor obtained by boiling some liquid which has a boiling point above °. in this way it has been proved that volumes of hydrogen and volume of oxygen combine to form exactly volumes of water vapor, the volumes all being measured under the same conditions of temperature and pressure. it will be noted that the relation between these volumes may be expressed by whole numbers. the significance of this very important fact will be discussed in a subsequent chapter. [illustration: fig. ] ~occurrence of water.~ water not only covers about three fourths of the surface of the earth, and is present in the atmosphere in the form of moisture, but it is also a common constituent of the soil and rocks and of almost every form of animal and vegetable organism. the human body is nearly % water. this is derived not only from the water which we drink but also from the food which we eat, most of which contains a large percentage of water. thus potatoes contain about % of water, milk %, beef over %, apples %, tomatoes %. ~impurities in water.~ chemically pure water contains only hydrogen and oxygen. such a water never occurs in nature, however, for being a good solvent, it takes up certain substances from the rocks and soil with which it comes in contact. when such waters are evaporated these substances are deposited in the form of a residue. even rain water, which is the purest form occurring in nature, contains dust particles and gases dissolved from the atmosphere. the foreign matter in water is of two kinds, namely, _mineral_, such as common salt and limestone, and _organic_, that is the products of animal and vegetable life. ~mineral matter in water.~ the amount and nature of the mineral matter present in different waters vary greatly, depending on the character of the rocks and soil with which the waters come in contact. the more common of the substances present are common salt and compounds of calcium, magnesium, and iron. one liter of the average river water contains about mg. of mineral matter. water from deep wells naturally contains more mineral matter than river water, generally two or three times as much, while sea water contains as much as , mg. to the liter. ~effect of impurities on health.~ the mineral matter in water does not, save in very exceptional cases, render the water injurious to the human system. in fact the presence of a certain amount of such matter is advantageous, supplying the mineral constituents necessary for the formation of the solid tissues of the body. the presence of organic matter, on the other hand, must always be regarded with suspicion. this organic matter may consist not only of the products of animal and vegetable life but also of certain microscopic forms of living organisms which are likely to accompany such products. contagious diseases are known to be due to the presence in the body of minute living organisms or germs. each disease is caused by its own particular kind of germ. through sewage these germs may find their way from persons afflicted with disease into the water supply, and it is principally through the drinking water that certain of these diseases, especially typhoid fever, are spread. it becomes of great importance, therefore, to be able to detect such matter when present in drinking water as well as to devise methods whereby it can be removed or at least rendered harmless. ~analysis of water.~ the mineral analysis of a water is, as the name suggests, simply the determination of the mineral matter present. sanitary analysis, on the other hand, is the determination of the organic matter present. the physical properties of a water give no conclusive evidence as to its purity, since a water may be unfit for drinking purposes and yet be perfectly clear and odorless. neither can any reliance be placed on the simple methods often given for testing the purity of water. only the trained chemist can carry out such methods of analysis as can be relied upon. [illustration: fig. ] ~purification of water.~ three general methods are used for the purification of water, namely, _distillation_, _filtration_, and _boiling_. . _distillation._ the most effective way of purifying natural waters is by the process of distillation. this consists in boiling the water and condensing the steam. fig. illustrates the process of distillation, as commonly conducted in the laboratory. ordinary water is poured into the flask a and boiled. the steam is conducted through the condenser b, which consists essentially of a narrow glass tube sealed within a larger one, the space between the two being filled with cold water, which is admitted at c and escapes at d. the inner tube is thus kept cool and the steam in passing through it is condensed. the water formed by the condensation of the steam collects in the receiver e and is known as _distilled_ water. such water is practically pure, since the impurities are nonvolatile and remain in the flask a. ~commercial distillation.~ in preparing distilled water on a large scale, the steam is generated in a boiler or other metal container and condensed by passing it through a pipe made of metal, generally tin. this pipe is wound into a spiral and is surrounded by a current of cold water. distilled water is used by the chemist in almost all of his work. it is also used in the manufacture of artificial ice and for drinking water. ~fractional distillation.~ in preparing distilled water, it is evident that if the natural water contains some substance which is volatile its vapor will pass over and be condensed with the steam, so that the distillate will not be pure water. even such mixtures, however, may generally be separated by repeated distillation. thus, if a mixture of water (boiling point °) and alcohol (boiling point °) is distilled, the alcohol, having the lower boiling point, tends to distill first, followed by the water. the separation of the two is not perfect, however, but may be made nearly so by repeated distillations. the process of separating a mixture of volatile substances by distillation is known as _fractional distillation_. . _filtration._ the process of distillation practically removes all nonvolatile foreign matter, mineral as well as organic. in purifying water for drinking purposes, however, it is only necessary to eliminate the latter or to render it harmless. this is ordinarily done either by filtration or boiling. in filtration the water is passed through some medium which will retain the organic matter. ordinary charcoal is a porous substance and will condense within its pores the organic matter in water if brought in contact with it. it is therefore well adapted to the construction of filters. such filters to be effective must be kept clean, since it is evident that the charcoal is useless after its pores are filled. a more effective type of filter is the chamberlain-pasteur filter. in this the water is forced through a porous cylindrical cup, the pores being so minute as to strain out the organic matter. ~city filtration beds.~ for purifying the water supply of cities, large filtration beds are prepared from sand and gravel, and the water is allowed to filter through these. some of the impurities are strained out by the filter, while others are decomposed by the action of certain kinds of bacteria present in the sand. fig. shows a cross section of a portion of the filter used in purifying the water supply of philadelphia. the water filters through the sand and gravel and passes into the porous pipe a, from which it is pumped into the city mains. the filters are covered to prevent the water from freezing in cold weather. [illustration: fig. ] . _boiling._ a simpler and equally efficient method for purifying water for drinking purposes consists in boiling the water. it is the germs in water that render it dangerous to health. these germs are living forms of matter. if the water is boiled, the germs are killed and the water rendered safe. while these germs are destroyed by heat, cold has little effect upon them. thus dewar, in working with liquid hydrogen, exposed some of these minute forms of life to the temperature of boiling hydrogen (- °) without killing them. ~self-purification of water.~ it has long been known that water contaminated with organic matter tends to purify itself when exposed to the air. this is due to the fact that the water takes up a small amount of oxygen from the air, which gradually oxidizes the organic matter present in the water. while water is undoubtedly purified in this way, the method cannot be relied upon to purify a contaminated water so as to render it safe for drinking purposes. ~physical properties.~ pure water is an odorless and tasteless liquid, colorless in thin layers, but having a bluish tinge when observed through a considerable thickness. it solidifies at ° and boils at ° under the normal pressure of one atmosphere. if the pressure is increased, the boiling point is raised. when water is cooled it steadily contracts until the temperature of ° is reached: it then expands. water is remarkable for its ability to dissolve other substances, and is the best solvent known. solutions of solids in water are more frequently employed in chemical work than are the solid substances, for chemical action between substances goes on more readily when they are in solution than it does when they are in the solid state. ~chemical properties.~ water is a very stable substance, or, in other words, it does not undergo decomposition readily. to decompose it into its elements by heat alone requires a very high temperature; at °, for example, only about % of the entire amount is decomposed. though very stable towards heat, water can be decomposed in other ways, as by the action of the electrical current or by certain metals. ~heat of formation and heat of decomposition are equal.~ the fact that a very high temperature is necessary to decompose water into hydrogen and oxygen is in accord with the fact that a great deal of heat is evolved by the union of hydrogen and oxygen; for it has been proved that the heat necessary to decompose a compound into its elements (heat of decomposition) is equal to the heat evolved in the formation of a compound from its elements (heat of formation). ~water of crystallization.~ when a solid is dissolved in water and the resulting solution is allowed to evaporate, the solid separates out, often in the form of crystals. it has been found that the crystals of many compounds, although perfectly dry, give up a definite amount of water when heated, the substance at the same time losing its crystalline form. such water is called _water of crystallization_. this varies in amount with different compounds, but is perfectly definite for the same compound. thus, if a perfectly dry crystal of copper sulphate is strongly heated in a tube, water is evolved and condenses on the sides of the tube, the crystal crumbling to a light powder. the weight of the water evolved is always equal to exactly . % of the weight of copper sulphate crystals heated. the water must therefore be in chemical combination with the substance composing the crystal; for if simply mixed with it or adhering to it, not only would the substance appear moist but the amount present would undoubtedly vary. the combination, however, must be a very weak one, since the water is often expelled by even a gentle heat. indeed, in some cases the water is given up on simple exposure to air. such compounds are said to be _efflorescent_. thus a crystal of sodium sulphate (glauber's salt) on exposure to air crumbles to a fine powder, owing to the escape of its water of crystallization. other substances have just the opposite property: they absorb moisture when exposed to the air. for example, if a bit of dry calcium chloride is placed in moist air, in the course of a few hours it will have absorbed sufficient moisture to dissolve it. such substances are said to be _deliquescent_. a deliquescent body serves as a good drying or _desiccating_ agent. we have already employed calcium chloride as an agent for absorbing the moisture from hydrogen. many substances, as for example quartz, form crystals which contain no water of crystallization. ~mechanically inclosed water.~ water of crystallization must be carefully distinguished from water which is mechanically inclosed in a crystal and which can be removed by powdering the crystal and drying. thus, when crystals of common salt are heated, the water inclosed in the crystal is changed into steam and bursts the crystal with a crackling sound. such crystals are said to _decrepitate_. that this water is not combined is proved by the fact that the amount present varies and that it has all the properties of water. ~uses of water.~ the importance of water in its relation to life and commerce is too well known to require comment. its importance to the chemist has also been pointed out. it remains to call attention to the fact that it is used as a standard in many physical measurements. thus ° and ° on the centigrade scale are respectively the freezing and the boiling points of water under normal pressure. the weight of cc. of water at its point of greatest density is the unit of weight in the metric system, namely, the gram. it is also taken as the unit for the determination of the density of liquids and solids as well as for the measurement of amounts of heat. hydrogen dioxide ~composition.~ as has been shown, part by weight of hydrogen combines with . parts by weight of oxygen to form water. it is possible, however, to obtain a second compound of hydrogen and oxygen differing from water in composition in that part by weight of hydrogen is combined with × . , or . parts, of oxygen. this compound is called _hydrogen dioxide_ or _hydrogen peroxide_, the prefixes _di-_ and _per-_ signifying that it contains more oxygen than hydrogen oxide, which is the chemical name for water. ~preparation.~ hydrogen dioxide cannot be prepared cheaply by the direct union of hydrogen and oxygen, and indirect methods must therefore be used. it is commonly prepared by the action of a solution of sulphuric acid on barium dioxide. the change which takes place may be indicated as follows: sulphuric acid + barium dioxide = barium sulphate + hydrogen dioxide -------------- -------------- --------------- ---------------- hydrogen barium barium hydrogen sulphur oxygen sulphur oxygen oxygen oxygen in other words, the barium and hydrogen in the two compounds exchange places. by this method a dilute solution of the dioxide in water is obtained. it is possible to separate the dioxide from the water by fractional distillation. this is attended with great difficulties, however, since the pure dioxide is explosive. the distillation is carried on under diminished pressure so as to lower the boiling points as much as possible; otherwise the high temperature would decompose the dioxide. ~properties.~ pure hydrogen dioxide is a colorless sirupy liquid having a density of . . its most characteristic property is the ease with which it decomposes into water and oxygen. one part by weight of hydrogen is capable of holding firmly only . parts of oxygen. the additional . parts of oxygen present in hydrogen dioxide are therefore easily evolved, the compound breaking down into water and oxygen. this decomposition is attended by the generation of considerable heat. in dilute solution hydrogen dioxide is fairly stable, although such a solution should be kept in a dark, cool place, since both heat and light aid in the decomposition of the dioxide. ~uses.~ solutions of hydrogen dioxide are used largely as oxidizing agents. the solution sold by druggists contains % of the dioxide and is used in medicine as an antiseptic. its use as an antiseptic depends upon its oxidizing properties. exercises . why does the chemist use distilled water in making solutions, rather than filtered water? . how could you determine the total amount of solid matter dissolved in a sample of water? . how could you determine whether a given sample of water is distilled water? . how could the presence of air dissolved in water be detected? . how could the amount of water in a food such as bread or potato be determined? . would ice frozen from impure water necessarily be free from disease germs? . suppose that the maximum density of water were at ° in place of °; what effect would this have on the formation of ice on bodies of water? . is it possible for a substance to contain both mechanically inclosed water and water of crystallization? . if steam is heated to ° and again cooled, has any chemical change taken place in the steam? . why is cold water passed into c instead of d (fig. )? . mention at least two advantages that a metal condenser has over a glass condenser. . draw a diagram of the apparatus used in your laboratory for supplying distilled water. . cc. of hydrogen and cc. of oxygen are placed in a eudiometer and the mixture exploded. (a) how many cubic centimeters of aqueous vapor are formed? (b) what gas and how much of it remains in excess? . (a) what weight of water can be formed by the combustion of l of hydrogen, measured under standard conditions? (b)what volume of oxygen would be required in (a)? (c)what weight of potassium chlorate is necessary to prepare this amount of oxygen? . what weight of oxygen is present in kg. of the ordinary hydrogen dioxide solution? in the decomposition of this weight of the dioxide into water and oxygen, what volume of oxygen (measured under standard conditions) is evolved? chapter v the atomic theory ~three fundamental laws of matter.~ before we can gain any very definite idea in regard to the structure of matter, and the way in which different kinds of substances act chemically upon each other, it is necessary to have clearly in view three fundamental laws of matter. these laws have been established by experiment, and any conception which may be formed concerning matter must therefore be in harmony with them. the laws are as follows: ~law of conservation of matter.~ this law has already been touched upon in the introductory chapter, and needs no further discussion. it will be recalled that it may be stated thus: _matter can neither be created nor destroyed, though it can be changed from one form into another._ ~law of definite composition.~ in the earlier days of chemistry there was much discussion as to whether the composition of a given compound is always precisely the same or whether it is subject to some variation. two frenchmen, berthollet and proust, were the leaders in this discussion, and a great deal of most useful experimenting was done to decide the question. their experiments, as well as all succeeding ones, have shown that the composition of a pure chemical compound is always exactly the same. water obtained by melting pure ice, condensing steam, burning hydrogen in oxygen, has always . % hydrogen and . % oxygen in it. red oxide of mercury, from whatever source it is obtained, contains . % mercury and . % oxygen. this truth is known as _the law of definite composition_, and may be stated thus: _the composition of a chemical compound never varies._ ~law of multiple proportion.~ it has already been noted, however, that hydrogen and oxygen combine in two different ratios to form water and hydrogen dioxide respectively. it will be observed that this fact does not contradict the law of definite composition, for entirely different substances are formed. these compounds differ from each other in composition, but the composition of each one is always constant. this ability of two elements to unite in more than one ratio is very frequently observed. carbon and oxygen combine in two different ratios; nitrogen and oxygen combine to form as many as five distinct compounds, each with its own precise composition. in the first decade of the last century john dalton, an english school-teacher and philosopher, endeavored to find some rule which holds between the ratios in which two given substances combine. his studies brought to light a very simple relation, which the following examples will make clear. in water the hydrogen and oxygen are combined in the ratio of part by weight of hydrogen to . parts by weight of oxygen. in hydrogen dioxide the part by weight of hydrogen is combined with . parts by weight of oxygen. the ratio between the amounts of oxygen which combine with the same amount of hydrogen to form water and hydrogen dioxide respectively is therefore . : . , or : . [illustration: john dalton (english) ( - ) developed the atomic theory; made many studies on the properties and the composition of gases. his book entitled "a new system of chemical philosophy" had a large influence on the development of chemistry] similarly, the element iron combines with oxygen to form two oxides, one of which is black and the other red. by analysis it has been shown that the former contains part by weight of iron combined with . parts by weight of oxygen, while the latter contains part by weight of iron combined with . parts by weight of oxygen. here again we find that the amounts of oxygen which combine with the same fixed amount of iron to form the two compounds are in the ratio of small whole numbers, viz., : . many other examples of this simple relation might be given, since it has been found to hold true in all cases where more than one compound is, formed from the same elements. dalton's law of multiple proportion states these facts as follows: _when any two elements,_ a _and_ b, _combine to form more than one compound, the amounts of_ b _which unite with any fixed amount of_ a _bear the ratio of small whole numbers to each other_. ~hypothesis necessary to explain the laws of matter.~ these three generalizations are called _laws_, because they express in concise language truths which are found by careful experiment to hold good in all cases. they do not offer any explanation of the facts, but merely state them. the human mind, however, does not rest content with the mere bare facts, but seeks ever to learn the explanation of the facts. a suggestion which is offered to explain such a set of facts is called an _hypothesis_. the suggestion which dalton offered to explain the three laws of matter, called the _atomic hypothesis_, was prompted by his view of the constitution of matter, and it involves three distinct assumptions in regard to the nature of matter and chemical action. dalton could not prove these assumptions to be true, but he saw that if they were true the laws of matter become very easy to understand. ~dalton's atomic hypothesis.~ the three assumptions which dalton made in regard to the nature of matter, and which together constitute the atomic hypothesis, are these: . all elements are made up of minute, independent particles which dalton designated as _atoms_. . all atoms of the same element have equal masses; those of different elements have different masses; in any change to which an atom is subjected its mass does not change. . when two or more elements unite to form a compound, the action consists in the union of a definite small number of atoms of each element to form a small particle of the compound. the smallest particles of a given compound are therefore exactly alike in the number and kinds of atoms which they contain, and larger masses of the substances are simply aggregations of these least particles. ~molecules and atoms.~ dalton applied the name atom not only to the minute particles of the elements but also to the least particles of compounds. later avogadro, an italian scientist, pointed out the fact that the two are different, since the smallest particle of an element is a unit, while that of a compound must have at least two units in it. he suggested the name _molecule_ for the least particle of a compound which can exist, retaining the name _atom_ for the smallest particle of an element. in accordance with this distinction, we may define the atom and the molecule as follows: _an atom is the smallest particle of an element which can exist. a molecule is the smallest particle of a compound which can exist._ it will be shown in a subsequent chapter that sometimes two or more atoms of the same element unite with each other to form molecules of the element. while the term atom, therefore, is applicable only to elements, the term molecule is applicable both to elements and compounds. ~the atomic hypothesis and the laws of matter.~ supposing the atomic hypothesis to be true, let us now see if it is in harmony with the laws of matter. . _the atomic hypothesis and the law of conservation of matter._ it is evident that if the atoms never change their masses in any change which they undergo, the total quantity of matter can never change and the law of conservation of matter must follow. . _the atomic hypothesis and the law of definite composition._ according to the third supposition, when iron combines with sulphur the union is between definite numbers of the two kinds of atoms. in the simplest case one atom of the one element combines with one atom of the other. if the sulphur and the iron atoms never change their respective masses when they unite to form a molecule of iron sulphide, all iron sulphide molecules will have equal amounts of iron in them and also of sulphur. consequently any mass made up of iron sulphide molecules will have the same fraction of iron by weight as do the individual iron sulphide molecules. iron sulphide, from whatever source, will have the same composition, which is in accordance with the law of definite composition. . _the atomic hypothesis and the law of multiple proportion._ but this simplest case may not always be the only one. under other conditions one atom of iron might combine with two of sulphur to form a molecule of a second compound. in such a case the one atom of iron would be in combination with twice the mass of sulphur that is in the first compound, since the sulphur atoms all have equal masses. what is true for one molecule will be true for any number of them; consequently when such quantities of these two compounds are selected as are found to contain the same amount of iron, the one will contain twice as much sulphur as the other. the combination between the atoms may of course take place in other simple ratios. for example, two atoms of one element might combine with three or with five of the other. in all such cases it is clear that the law of multiple proportion must hold true. for on selecting such numbers of the two kinds of molecules as have the same number of the one kind of atoms, the numbers of the other kind of atoms will stand in some simple ratio to each other, and their weights will therefore stand in the same simple ratio. ~testing the hypothesis.~ efforts have been made to find compounds which do not conform to these laws, but all such attempts have resulted in failure. if such compounds should be found, the laws would be no longer true, and the hypothesis of dalton would cease to possess value. when an hypothesis has been tested in every way in which experiment can test it, and is still found to be in harmony with the facts in the case, it is termed a _theory_. we now speak of the atomic theory rather than of the atomic hypothesis. ~value of a theory.~ the value of a theory is twofold. it aids in the clear understanding of the laws of nature because it gives an intelligent idea as to why these laws should be in operation. a theory also leads to discoveries. it usually happens that in testing a theory much valuable work is done, and many new facts are discovered. almost any theory in explaining given laws will involve a number of consequences apart from the laws it seeks to explain. experiment will soon show whether these facts are as the theory predicts they will be. thus dalton's atomic theory predicted many properties of gases which experiment has since verified. ~atomic weights.~ it would be of great advantage in the study of chemistry if we could determine the weights of the different kinds of atoms. it is evident that this cannot be done directly. they are so small that they cannot be seen even with a most powerful microscope. it is calculated that it would take , , hydrogen atoms placed side by side to make a row one centimeter long. no balance can weigh such minute objects. it is possible, however, to determine their relative weights,--that is, how much heavier one is than another. _these relative weights of the atoms are spoken of as the atomic weights of the elements._ if elements were able to combine in only one way,--one atom of one with one atom of another,--the problem of determining the atomic weights would be very simple. we should merely have to take some one convenient element as a standard, and find by experiment how much of each other element would combine with a fixed weight of it. the ratios thus found would be the same ratios as those between the atoms of the elements, and thus we should have their relative atomic weights. the law of multiple proportion calls attention to the fact that the atoms combine in other ratios than : , and there is no direct way of telling which one, if any, of the several compounds in a given case is the one consisting of a single atom of each element. if some way were to be found of telling how much heavier the entire molecule of a compound is than the atom chosen as a standard,--that is, of determining the molecular weights of compounds,--the problem could be solved, though its solution would not be an entirely simple matter. there are ways of determining the molecular weights of compounds, and there are other experiments which throw light directly upon the relative weights of the atoms. these methods cannot be described until the facts upon which they rest have been studied. it will be sufficient for the present to assume that these methods are trustworthy. ~standard for atomic weights.~ since the atomic weights are merely relative to some one element chosen as a standard, it is evident that any one of the elements may serve as this standard and that any convenient value may be assigned to its atom. at one time oxygen was taken as this standard, with the value , and the atomic weights of the other elements were expressed in terms of this standard. it would seem more rational to take the element of smallest atomic weight as the standard and give it unit value; accordingly hydrogen was taken as the standard with an atomic weight of . very recently, however, this unit has been replaced by oxygen, with an atomic weight of . ~why oxygen is chosen as the standard for atomic weights.~ in the determination of the atomic weight of an element it is necessary to find the weight of the element which combines with a definite weight of another element, preferably the element chosen as the standard. since oxygen combines with the elements far more readily than does hydrogen to form definite compounds, it is far better adapted for the standard element, and has accordingly replaced hydrogen as the standard. any definite value might be given to the weight of the oxygen atom. in assigning a value to it, however, it is convenient to choose a whole number, and as small a number as possible without making the atomic weight of any other element less than unity. for these reasons the number has been chosen as the atomic weight of oxygen. this makes the atomic weight of hydrogen equal to . , so that there is but little difference between taking oxygen as and hydrogen as for the unit. the atomic weights of the elements are given in the appendix. exercises . two compounds were found to have the following compositions: (a) oxygen = . %, nitrogen = . %; (b) oxygen = . %, nitrogen = . %. show that the law of multiple proportion holds in this case. . two compounds were found to have the following compositions: (a) oxygen = . %, phosphorus = . %; (b) oxygen = . %, phosphorus = . %. show that the law of multiple proportion holds in this case. . why did dalton assume that all the atoms of a given element have the same weight? chapter vi chemical equations and calculations ~formulas.~ since the molecule of any chemical compound consists of a definite number of atoms, and this number never changes without destroying the identity of the compound, it is very convenient to represent the composition of a compound by indicating the composition of its molecules. this can be done very easily by using the symbols of the atoms to indicate the number and the kind of the atoms which constitute the molecule. hgo will in this way represent mercuric oxide, a molecule of which has been found to contain atom each of mercury and oxygen. h_{ }o will represent water, the molecules of which consist of atom of oxygen and of hydrogen, the subscript figure indicating the number of the atoms of the element whose symbol precedes it. h_{ }so_{ } will stand for sulphuric acid, the molecules of which contain atoms of hydrogen, of sulphur, and of oxygen. the combination of symbols which represents the molecule of a substance is called its _formula_. ~equations.~ when a given substance undergoes a chemical change it is possible to represent this change by the use of such symbols and formulas. in a former chapter it was shown that mercuric oxide decomposes when heated to form mercury and oxygen. this may be expressed very briefly in the form of the equation ( ) hgo = hg + o. when water is electrolyzed two new substances, hydrogen and oxygen, are formed from it. this statement in the form of an equation is ( ) h_{ }o = h + o. the coefficient before the symbol for hydrogen indicates that a single molecule of water yields two atoms of hydrogen on decomposition. in like manner the combination of sulphur with iron is expressed by the equation ( ) fe + s = fes. the decomposition of potassium chlorate by heat takes place as represented by the equation ( ) kclo_{ } = kcl + o. ~reading of equations.~ since equations are simply a kind of shorthand way of indicating chemical changes which occur under certain conditions, in reading an equation the full statement for which it stands should be given. equation ( ) should be read, "mercuric oxide when heated gives mercury and oxygen"; equation ( ) is equivalent to the statement, "when electrolyzed, water produces hydrogen and oxygen"; equation ( ), "when heated together iron and sulphur unite to form iron sulphide"; equation ( ), "potassium chlorate when heated yields potassium chloride and oxygen." ~knowledge required for writing equations.~ in order to write such equations correctly, a considerable amount of exact knowledge is required. thus, in equation ( ) the fact that red oxide of mercury has the composition represented by the formula hgo, that it is decomposed by heat, that in this decomposition mercury and oxygen are formed and no other products,--all these facts must be ascertained by exact experiment before the equation can be written. an equation expressing these facts will then have much value. having obtained an equation describing the conduct of mercuric oxide on being heated, it will not do to assume that other oxides will behave in like manner. iron oxide (feo) resembles mercuric oxide in many respects, but it undergoes no change at all when heated. manganese dioxide, the black substance used in the preparation of oxygen, has the formula mno_{ }. when this substance is heated oxygen is set free, but the metal manganese is not liberated; instead, a different oxide of manganese containing less oxygen is produced. the equation representing the reaction is mno_{ } = mn_{ }o_{ } + o. ~classes of reactions.~ when a chemical change takes place in a substance the substance is said to undergo a reaction. although a great many different reactions will be met in the study of chemistry, they may all be grouped under the following heads. . _addition._ this is the simplest kind of chemical action. it consists in the union of two or more substances to produce a new substance. the combination of iron with sulphur is an example: fe + s = fes. . _decomposition._ this is the reverse of addition, the substance undergoing reaction being parted into its constituents. the decomposition of mercuric oxide is an example: hgo = hg + o. . _substitution._ it is sometimes possible for an element in the free state to act upon a compound in such a way that it takes the place of one of the elements of the compound, liberating it in turn. in the study of the element hydrogen it was pointed out that hydrogen is most conveniently prepared by the action of sulphuric or hydrochloric acid upon zinc. when sulphuric acid is used a substance called zinc sulphate, having the composition represented by the formula znso_{ }, is formed together with hydrogen. the equation is zn + h_{ }so_{ } = znso_{ } + h. when hydrochloric acid is used zinc chloride and hydrogen are the products of reaction: zn + hcl = zncl_{ } + h. when iron is used in place of zinc the equation is fe + h_{ }so_{ } = feso_{ } + h. these reactions are quite similar, as is apparent from an examination of the equations. in each case atom of the metal replaces atoms of hydrogen in the acid, and the hydrogen escapes as a gas. when an element in the free state, such as the zinc in the equations just given, takes the place of some one element in a compound, setting it free from chemical combination, the act is called _substitution_. other reactions illustrating substitution are the action of sodium on water, na + h_{ }o = naoh + h; and the action of heated iron upon water, fe + h_{ }o = fe_{ }o_{ } + h. . _double decomposition._ when barium dioxide (bao_{ }) is treated with sulphuric acid two compounds are formed, namely, hydrogen dioxide (h_{ }o_{ }) and barium sulphate (baso_{ }). the equation is bao_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } = baso_{ } + h_{ }o_{ }. in this reaction it will be seen that the two elements barium and hydrogen simply exchange places. such a reaction is called a _double decomposition_. we shall meet with many examples of this kind of chemical reactions. ~chemical equations are quantitative.~ the use of symbols and formulas in expressing chemical changes has another great advantage. thus, according to the equation h_{ }o = h + o, molecule of water is decomposed into atoms of hydrogen and atom of oxygen. but, as we have seen, the relative weights of the atoms are known, that of hydrogen being . , while that of oxygen is . the molecule of water, being composed of atoms of hydrogen and atom of oxygen, must therefore weigh relatively . + , or . . the amount of hydrogen in this molecule must be . / . , or . % of the whole, while the amount of oxygen must be / . , or . % of the whole. now, since any definite quantity of water is simply the sum of a great many molecules of water, it is plain that the fractions representing the relative amounts of hydrogen and oxygen present in a molecule must likewise express the relative amounts of hydrogen and oxygen present in any quantity of water. thus, for example, in g. of water there are . / . × , or . g. of hydrogen, and / . × , or . g. of oxygen. these results in reference to the composition of water of course agree exactly with the facts obtained by the experiments described in the chapter on water, for it is because of those experiments that the values . and are given to hydrogen and oxygen respectively. it is often easier to make calculations of this kind in the form of a proportion rather than by fractions. since the molecule of water and the two atoms of hydrogen which it contains have the ratio by weight of . : . , any mass of water has the same ratio between its total weight and the weight of the hydrogen in it. hence, to find the number of grams (x) of hydrogen in g. of water, we have the proportion . : . :: g. : x (grams of hydrogen). solving for x, we get . for the number of grams of hydrogen. similarly, to find the amount (x) of oxygen present in the g. of water, we have the proportion . : :: : x from which we find that x = . g. again, suppose we wish to find what weight of oxygen can be obtained from g. of mercuric oxide. the equation representing the decomposition of mercuric oxide is hgo = hg + o. the relative weights of the mercury and oxygen atoms are respectively and . the relative weight of the mercuric oxide molecule must therefore be the sum of these, or . the molecule of mercuric oxide and the atom of oxygen which it contains have the ratio : . this same ratio must therefore hold between the weight of any given quantity of mercuric oxide and that of the oxygen which it contains. hence, to find the weight of oxygen in g. of mercuric oxide, we have the proportion : :: : x (grams of oxygen). on the other hand, suppose we wish to prepare, say, g. of oxygen. the problem is to find out what weight of mercuric oxide will yield g. of oxygen. the following proportion evidently holds : :: x (grams of mercuric oxide) : ; from which we get x = . in the preparation of hydrogen by the action of sulphuric acid upon zinc, according to the equation, zn + h_{ }so_{ } = znso_{ } + h, suppose that g. of zinc are available; let it be required to calculate the weight of hydrogen which can be obtained. it will be seen that atom of zinc will liberate atoms of hydrogen. the ratio by weight of a zinc to an hydrogen atom is . : . ; of zinc atom to hydrogen atoms, . : . . zinc and hydrogen will be related in this reaction in this same ratio, however many atoms of zinc are concerned. consequently in the proportion . : . :: : x, x will be the weight of hydrogen set free by g. of zinc. the weight of zinc sulphate produced at the same time can be found from the proportion . : . :: : x; where . is the molecular weight of the zinc sulphate, and x the weight of zinc sulphate formed. in like manner, the weight of sulphuric acid used up can be calculated from the proportion . : . :: : x. these simple calculations are possible because the symbols and formulas in the equations represent the relative weights of the substances concerned in a chemical reaction. when once the relative weights of the atoms have been determined, and it has been agreed to allow the symbols to stand for these relative weights, an equation or formula making use of the symbols becomes a statement of a definite numerical fact, and calculations can be based on it. ~chemical equations not algebraic.~ although chemical equations are quantitative, it must be clearly understood that they are not algebraic. a glance at the equations + = , + = + will show at once that they are true. the equations hgo = hg + o, feo = fe + o are equally true in an algebraic sense, but experiment shows that only the first is true chemically, for iron oxide (feo) cannot be directly decomposed into iron and oxygen. only such equations as have been found by careful experiment to express a real chemical transformation, true both for the kinds of substances as well as for the weights, have any value. _chemical formulas and equations, therefore, are a concise way of representing qualitatively and quantitatively facts which have been found by experiment to be true in reference to the composition of substances and the changes which they undergo._ ~formulas representing water of crystallization.~ an examination of substances containing water of crystallization has shown that in every case the water is present in such proportion by weight as can readily be represented by a formula. for example, copper sulphate (cuso_{ }) and water combine in the ratio of molecule of the sulphate to of water; calcium sulphate (caso_{ }) and water combine in the ratio : to form gypsum. these facts are expressed by writing the formulas for the two substances with a period between them. thus the formula for crystallized copper sulphate is cuso_{ }· h_{ }o; that of gypsum is caso_{ }· h_{ }o. ~heat of reaction.~ attention has frequently been directed to the fact that chemical changes are usually accompanied by heat changes. in general it has been found that in every chemical action heat is either absorbed or given off. by adopting a suitable unit for the measurement of heat, the heat change during a chemical reaction can be expressed in the equation for the reaction. heat cannot be measured by the use of a thermometer alone, since the thermometer measures the intensity of heat, not its quantity. the easiest way to measure a quantity of heat is to note how warm it will make a definite amount of a given substance chosen as a standard. water has been chosen as the standard, and the unit of heat is called a _calorie. a calorie is defined as the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of one gram of water one degree._ by means of this unit it is easy to indicate the heat changes in a given chemical reaction. the equation h + o = h_{ }o + , cal. means that when . g. of hydrogen combine with g. of oxygen, . g. of water are formed and , cal. are set free. c + s = cs_{ } - , cal. means that an expenditure of , cal. is required to cause g. of carbon to unite with . g. of sulphur to form . g. of carbon disulphide. in these equations it will be noted that the symbols stand for as many grams of the substance as there are units in the weights of the atoms represented by the symbols. this is always understood to be the case in equations where the heat of reaction is given. ~conditions of a chemical action are not indicated by equations.~ equations do not tell the conditions under which a reaction will take place. the equation hgo = hg + o does not tell us that it is necessary to keep the mercuric oxide at a high temperature in order that the decomposition may go on. the equation zn + hcl = zncl_{ } + h in no way indicates the fact that the hydrochloric acid must be dissolved in water before it will act upon the zinc. from the equation h + cl = hcl it would not be suspected that the two gases hydrogen and chlorine will unite instantly in the sunlight, but will stand mixed in the dark a long time without change. it will therefore be necessary to pay much attention to the details of the conditions under which a given reaction occurs, as well as to the expression of the reaction in the form of an equation. exercises . calculate the percentage composition of the following substances: (a) mercuric oxide; (b) potassium chlorate; (c) hydrochloric acid; (d) sulphuric acid. compare the results obtained with the compositions as given in chapters ii and iii. . determine the percentage of copper, sulphur, oxygen, and water in copper sulphate crystals. what weight of water can be obtained from g. of this substance? . what weight of zinc can be dissolved in g. of sulphuric acid? how much zinc sulphate will be formed? . how many liters of hydrogen measured under standard conditions can be obtained from the action of g. of iron on g. of sulphuric acid? how much iron sulphate (feso_{ }) will be formed? . g. of zinc were used in the preparation of hydrogen; what weight of iron will be required to prepare an equal volume? . how many grams of barium dioxide will be required to prepare kg. of common hydrogen dioxide solution? what weight of barium sulphate will be formed at the same time? . what weight of the compound mn_{ }o_{ } will be formed by strongly heating g. of manganese dioxide? what volume of oxygen will be given off at the same time, measured under standard conditions? . (a) what is the weight of l. of hydrogen measured in a laboratory in which the temperature is ° and pressure mm.? (b) what weight of sulphuric acid is necessary to prepare this amount of hydrogen? (c) the density of sulphuric acid is . . express the acid required in (b) in cubic centimeters. . what weight of potassium chlorate is necessary to furnish sufficient oxygen to fill four cc. bottles in your laboratory (the gas to be collected over water)? chapter vii nitrogen and the rare elements: argon, helium, neon, krypton, xenon ~historical.~ nitrogen was discovered by the english chemist rutherford in . a little later scheele showed it to be a constituent of air, and lavoisier gave it the name _azote_, signifying that it would not support life. the name _nitrogen_ was afterwards given it because of its presence in saltpeter or niter. the term azote and symbol az are still retained by the french chemists. ~occurrence.~ air is composed principally of oxygen and nitrogen in the free state, about parts by volume out of every parts being nitrogen. nitrogen also occurs in nature in the form of potassium nitrate (kno_{ })--commonly called saltpeter or niter--as well as in sodium nitrate (nano_{ }). nitrogen is also an essential constituent of all living organisms; for example, the human body contains about . % of nitrogen. ~preparation from air.~ nitrogen can be prepared from air by the action of some substance which will combine with the oxygen, leaving the nitrogen free. such a substance must be chosen, however, as will combine with the oxygen to form a product which is not a gas, and which can be readily separated from the nitrogen. the substances most commonly used for this purpose are phosphorus and copper. . _by the action of phosphorus._ the method used for the preparation of nitrogen by the action of phosphorus is as follows: the phosphorus is placed in a little porcelain dish, supported on a cork and floated on water (fig. ). it is then ignited by contact with a hot wire, and immediately a bell jar or bottle is brought over it so as to confine a portion of the air. the phosphorus combines with the oxygen to form an oxide of phosphorus, known as phosphorus pentoxide. this is a white solid which floats about in the bell jar, but in a short time it is all absorbed by the water, leaving the nitrogen. the withdrawal of the oxygen is indicated by the rising of the water in the bell jar. [illustration: fig. ] . _by the action of copper._ the oxygen present in the air may also be removed by passing air slowly through a heated tube containing copper. the copper combines with the oxygen to form copper oxide, which is a solid. the nitrogen passes on and may be collected over water. ~nitrogen obtained from air is not pure.~ inasmuch as air, in addition to oxygen and nitrogen, contains small amounts of other gases, and since the phosphorus as well as the copper removes only the oxygen, it is evident that the nitrogen obtained by these methods is never quite pure. about % of the product is composed of other gases, from which it is very difficult to separate the nitrogen. the impure nitrogen so obtained may, however, be used for a study of most of the properties of nitrogen, since these are not materially affected by the presence of the other gases. ~preparation from compounds of nitrogen.~ pure nitrogen may be obtained from certain compounds of the element. thus, if heat is applied to the compound ammonium nitrite (nh_{ }no_{ }), the change represented in the following equation takes place: nh_{ }no_{ } = h_{ }o + n. ~physical properties.~ nitrogen is similar to oxygen and hydrogen in that it is a colorless, odorless, and tasteless gas. one liter of nitrogen weighs . g. it is almost insoluble in water. it can be obtained in the form of a colorless liquid having a boiling point of - ° at ordinary pressure. at - ° it solidifies. ~chemical properties.~ nitrogen is characterized by its inertness. it is neither combustible nor a supporter of combustion. at ordinary temperatures it will not combine directly with any of the elements except under rare conditions. at higher temperatures it combines with magnesium, lithium, titanium, and a number of other elements. the compounds formed are called _nitrides_, just as compounds of an element with oxygen are called _oxides_. when it is mixed with oxygen and subjected to the action of electric sparks, the two gases slowly combine forming oxides of nitrogen. a mixture of nitrogen and hydrogen when treated similarly forms ammonia, a gaseous compound of nitrogen and hydrogen. since we are constantly inhaling nitrogen, it is evident that it is not poisonous. nevertheless life would be impossible in an atmosphere of pure nitrogen on account of the exclusion of the necessary oxygen. ~argon, helium, neon, krypton, xenon.~ these are all rare elements occurring in the air in very small quantities. argon, discovered in , was the first one obtained. lord rayleigh, an english scientist, while engaged in determining the exact weights of various gases, observed that the nitrogen obtained from the air is slightly heavier than pure nitrogen obtained from its compounds. after repeating his experiments many times, always with the same results, rayleigh finally concluded that the nitrogen which he had obtained from the air was not pure, but was mixed with a small amount of some unknown gas, the density of which is greater than that of nitrogen. acting on this assumption, rayleigh, together with the english chemist ramsay, attempted to separate the nitrogen from the unknown gas. knowing that nitrogen would combine with magnesium, they passed the nitrogen obtained from the air and freed from all known substances through tubes containing magnesium heated to the necessary temperature. after repeating this operation, they finally succeeded in obtaining from the atmospheric nitrogen a small volume of gas which would not combine with magnesium and hence could not be nitrogen. this proved to be a new element, to which they gave the name _argon_. as predicted, this new element was found to be heavier than nitrogen, its density as compared with hydrogen as a standard being approximately , that of nitrogen being only . about % of the atmospheric nitrogen proved to be argon. the new element is characterized by having no affinity for other elements. even under the most favorable conditions it has not been made to combine with any other element. on this account it was given the name argon, signifying lazy or idle. like nitrogen, it is colorless, odorless, and tasteless. it has been liquefied and solidified. its boiling point is - °. helium was first found in the gases expelled from certain minerals by heating. through the agency of the spectroscope it had been known to exist in the sun long before its presence on the earth had been demonstrated,--a fact suggested by the name helium, signifying the sun. its existence in traces in the atmosphere has also been proven. it was first liquefied by onnes in july, . its boiling point, namely - °, is the lowest temperature yet reached. the remaining elements of this group--neon, krypton, and xenon--have been obtained from liquid air. when liquid air is allowed to boil, the constituents which are the most difficult to liquefy, and which therefore have the lowest boiling points, vaporize first, followed by the others in the order of their boiling points. it is possible in this way to make at least a partial separation of the air into its constituents, and ramsay thus succeeded in obtaining from liquid air not only the known constituents, including argon and helium, but also the new elements, neon, krypton, and xenon. these elements, as well as helium, all proved to be similar to argon in that they are without chemical activity, apparently forming no compounds whatever. the percentages present in the air are very small. the names, neon, krypton, xenon, signify respectively, new, hidden, stranger. exercises . how could you distinguish between oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen? . calculate the relative weights of nitrogen and oxygen; of nitrogen and hydrogen. . in the preparation of nitrogen from the air, how would hydrogen do as a substance for the removal of the oxygen? . what weight of nitrogen can be obtained from l. of air measured under the conditions of temperature and pressure which prevail in your laboratory? . how many grams of ammonium nitrite are necessary in the preparation of l. of nitrogen measured over water under the conditions of temperature and pressure which prevail in your laboratory? . if l. of air, measured under standard conditions, is passed over g. of hot copper, how much will the copper gain in weight? [illustration: william ramsay (scotch) ( -) has made many studies in the physical properties of substances; discovered helium; together with lord rayleigh and others he discovered argon, krypton, xenon, and neon; has contributed largely to the knowledge of radio-active substances, showing that radium gradually gives rise to helium; professor at university college, london] chapter viii the atmosphere ~atmosphere and air.~ the term _atmosphere_ is applied to the gaseous envelope surrounding the earth. the term _air_ is generally applied to a limited portion of this envelope, although the two words are often used interchangeably. many references have already been made to the composition and properties of the atmosphere. these statements must now be collected and discussed somewhat more in detail. ~air formerly regarded as an element.~ like water, air was at first regarded as elementary in character. near the close of the eighteenth century scheele, priestley, and lavoisier showed by their experiments that it is a mixture of at least two gases,--those which we now call oxygen and nitrogen. by burning substances in an inclosed volume of air and noting the contraction in volume due to the removal of the oxygen, they were able to determine with some accuracy the relative volumes of oxygen and nitrogen present in the air. ~the constituents of the atmosphere.~ the constituents of the atmosphere may be divided into two general groups: those which are essential to life and those which are not essential. . _constituents essential to life._ in addition to oxygen and nitrogen at least two other substances, namely, carbon dioxide and water vapor, must be present in the atmosphere in order that life may exist. the former of these is a gaseous compound of carbon and oxygen having the formula co_{ }. its properties will be discussed in detail in the chapter on the compounds of carbon. its presence in the air may be shown by causing the air to bubble through a solution of calcium hydroxide (ca(oh)_{ }), commonly called lime water. the carbon dioxide combines with the calcium hydroxide in accordance with the following equation: ca(oh)_{ } + co_{ } = caco_{ } + h_{ }o. the resulting calcium carbonate (caco_{ }) is insoluble in water and separates in the form of a white powder, which causes the solution to appear milky. the presence of water vapor is readily shown by its condensation on cold objects as well as by the fact that a bit of calcium chloride when exposed to the air becomes moist, and may even dissolve in the water absorbed from the air. . _constituents not essential to life._ in addition to the essential constituents, the air contains small percentages of various other gases, the presence of which so far as is known is not essential to life. this list includes the rare elements, argon, helium, neon, krypton, and xenon; also hydrogen, ammonia, hydrogen dioxide, and probably ozone. certain minute forms of life (germs) are also present, the decay of organic matter being due to their presence. ~function of each of the essential constituents.~ ( ) the oxygen directly supports life through respiration. ( ) the nitrogen, on account of its inactivity, serves to dilute the oxygen, and while contrary to the older views, it is possible that life might continue to exist in the absence of the atmospheric nitrogen, yet the conditions of life would be entirely changed. moreover, nitrogen is an essential constituent of all animal and plant life. it was formerly supposed that neither animals nor plants could assimilate the free nitrogen, but it has been shown recently that the plants of at least one natural order, the leguminosæ, to which belong the beans, peas, and clover, have the power of directly assimilating the free nitrogen from the atmosphere. this is accomplished through the agency of groups of bacteria, which form colonies in little tubercles on the roots of the plants. these bacteria probably assist in the absorption of nitrogen by changing the free nitrogen into compounds which can be assimilated by the plant. fig. shows the tubercles on the roots of a variety of bean. ( ) the presence of water vapor in the air is necessary to prevent excessive evaporation from both plants and animals. ( ) carbon dioxide is an essential plant food. [illustration: fig. ] ~the quantitative analysis of air.~ a number of different methods have been devised for the determination of the percentages of the constituents present in the atmosphere. among these are the following. . _determination of oxygen._ ( ) the oxygen is withdrawn from a measured volume of air inclosed in a tube, by means of phosphorus. to make the determination, a graduated tube is filled with water and inverted in a vessel of water. air is introduced into the tube until it is partially filled with the gas. the volume of the inclosed air is carefully noted and reduced to standard conditions. a small piece of phosphorus is attached to a wire and brought within the tube as shown in fig. . after a few hours the oxygen in the inclosed air will have combined with the phosphorus, the water rising to take its place. the phosphorus is removed and the volume is again noted and reduced to standard conditions. the contraction in the volume of the air is equal to the volume of oxygen absorbed. [illustration: fig. ] ( ) the oxygen may also be estimated by passing a measured volume of air through a tube containing copper heated to a high temperature. the oxygen in the air combines with the copper to form copper oxide (cuo). hence the increase in the weight of the copper equals the weight of the oxygen in the volume of air taken. ( ) a more accurate method is the following. a eudiometer tube is filled with mercury and inverted in a vessel of the same liquid. a convenient amount of air is then introduced into the tube and its volume accurately noted. there is then introduced more than sufficient hydrogen to combine with the oxygen present in the inclosed air, and the volume is again accurately noted. the mixture is then exploded by an electric spark, and the volume is once more taken. by subtracting this volume from the total volume of the air and hydrogen there is obtained the contraction in volume due to the union of the oxygen and hydrogen. the volume occupied by the water formed by the union of the two gases is so small that it may be disregarded in the calculation. since oxygen and hydrogen combine in the ratio : by volume, it is evident that the contraction in volume due to the combination is equal to the volume occupied by the oxygen in the air contained in the tube, plus twice this volume of hydrogen. in other words, one third of the total contraction is equal to the volume occupied by the oxygen in the inclosed air. the following example will make this clear: volume of air in tube . cc. volume after introducing hydrogen . volume after combination of oxygen and hydrogen . contraction in volume due to combination ( cc.- . cc.) . volume of oxygen in cc. of air ( / of . ) . all these methods agree in showing that volumes of dry air contain approximately volumes of oxygen. . _determination of nitrogen._ if the gas left after the removal of oxygen from a portion of air is passed over heated magnesium, the nitrogen is withdrawn, argon and the other rare elements being left. it may thus be shown that of the volumes of gas left after the removal of the oxygen from volumes of air, approximately are nitrogen and . argon. the other elements are present in such small quantities that they may be neglected. . _determination of carbon dioxide._ the percentage of carbon dioxide in any given volume of air may be determined by passing the air over calcium hydroxide or some other compound which will combine with the carbon dioxide. the increase in the weight of the hydroxide equals the weight of the carbon dioxide absorbed. the amount present in the open normal air is from to parts by volume in , volumes of air, or about . %. . _determination of water vapor._ the water vapor present in a given volume of air may be determined by passing the air over calcium chloride (or some other compound which has a strong affinity for water), and noting the increase in the weight of the chloride. the amount present varies not only with the locality, but there is a wide variation from day to day in the same locality because of the winds and changes in temperature. ~processes affecting the composition of the air.~ the most important of these processes are the following. . _respiration._ in the process of respiration some of the oxygen in the inhaled air is absorbed by the blood and carried to all parts of the body, where it combines with the carbon of the worn-out tissues. the products of oxidation are carried back to the lungs and exhaled in the form of carbon dioxide. the amount exhaled by an adult averages about l. per hour. hence in a poorly ventilated room occupied by a number of people the amount of carbon dioxide rapidly increases. while this gas is not poisonous unless present in large amounts, nevertheless air containing more than parts in , is not fit for respiration. . _combustion._ all of the ordinary forms of fuel contain large percentages of carbon. on burning, this carbon combines with oxygen in the air, forming carbon dioxide. combustion and respiration, therefore, tend to diminish the amount of oxygen in the air and to increase the amount of carbon dioxide. . _action of plants._ plants have the power, when in the sunlight, of absorbing carbon dioxide from the air, retaining the carbon and returning at least a portion of the oxygen to the air. it will be observed that these changes are just the opposite of those brought about by the processes of respiration and combustion. ~poisonous effect of exhaled air.~ the differences in the percentages of oxygen, carbon dioxide, and moisture present in inhaled air and exhaled air are shown in the following analyses. inhaled air exhaled air oxygen . % . % carbon dioxide . . moisture variable saturated the foul odor of respired air is due to the presence of a certain amount of organic matter. it is possible that this organic matter rather than the carbon dioxide is responsible for the injurious effects which follow the respiration of impure air. the extent of such organic impurities present may be judged, however, by the amount of carbon dioxide present, since the two are exhaled together. ~the cycle of carbon in nature.~ under the influence of sunlight, the carbon dioxide absorbed from the air by plants reacts with water and small amounts of other substances absorbed from the soil to form complex compounds of carbon which constitute the essential part of the plant tissue. this reaction is attended by the evolution of oxygen, which is restored to the air. the compounds resulting from these changes are much richer in their energy content than are the substances from which they are formed; hence a certain amount of energy must have been absorbed in their formation. the source of this energy is the sun's rays. if the plant is burned, the changes which took place in the formation of the compounds present are largely reversed. the carbon and hydrogen present combine with oxygen taken from the air to form carbon dioxide and water, while the energy absorbed from the sun's rays is liberated in the form of energy of heat. if, on the other hand, the plant is used as food, the compounds present are used in building up the tissues of the body. when this tissue breaks down, the changes which it undergoes are very similar to those which take place when the plant is burned. the carbon and hydrogen combine with the inhaled oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water, which are exhaled. the energy possessed by the complex substances is liberated partly in the form of energy of heat, which maintains the heat of the body, and partly in the various forms of muscular energy. the carbon originally absorbed from the air by the plant in the form of carbon dioxide is thus restored to the air and is ready to repeat the cycle of changes. ~the composition of the air is constant.~ notwithstanding the changes constantly taking place which tend to alter the composition of the air, the results of a great many analyses of air collected in the open fields show that the percentages of oxygen and nitrogen as well as of carbon dioxide are very nearly constant. indeed, so constant are the percentages of oxygen and nitrogen that the question has arisen, whether these two elements are not combined in the air, forming a definite chemical compound. that the two are not combined but are simply mixed together can be shown in a number of ways, among which are the following. . when air dissolves in water it has been found that the ratio of oxygen to nitrogen in the dissolved air is no longer : , but more nearly : . if it were a chemical compound, the ratio of oxygen to nitrogen would not be changed by solution in water. . a chemical compound in the form of a liquid has a definite boiling point. water, for example, boils at °. moreover the steam which is thus formed has the same composition as the water. the boiling point of liquid air, on the other hand, gradually rises as the liquid boils, the nitrogen escaping first followed by the oxygen. if the two were combined, they would pass off together in the ratio in which they are found in the air. ~why the air has a constant composition.~ if air is a mixture and changes are constantly taking place which tend to modify its composition, how, then, do we account for the constancy of composition which the analyses reveal? this is explained by several facts. ( ) the changes which are caused by the processes of combustion and respiration, on the one hand, and the action of plants, on the other, tend to equalize each other. ( ) the winds keep the air in constant motion and so prevent local changes. ( ) the volume of the air is so vast and the changes which occur are so small compared with the total amount of air that they cannot be readily detected. ( ) finally it must be noted that only air collected in the open fields shows this constancy in composition. the air in a poorly ventilated room occupied by a number of people rapidly changes in composition. ~the properties of the air.~ inasmuch as air is composed principally of a mixture of oxygen and nitrogen, which elements have already been discussed, its properties may be inferred largely from those of the two gases. one liter weighs . g. it is thus . times as heavy as hydrogen. at the sea level it exerts an average pressure sufficient to sustain a column of mercury mm. in height. this is taken as the standard pressure in determining the volumes of gases as well as the boiling points of liquids. water may be made to boil at any temperature between ° and considerably above ° by simply varying the pressure. it is only when the pressure upon it is equal to the normal pressure of the atmosphere at the sea level, as indicated by a barometric reading of mm., that it boils at °. ~preparation of liquid air.~ attention has been called to the fact that both oxygen and nitrogen can be obtained in the liquid state by strongly cooling the gases and applying great pressure to them. since air is largely a mixture of these two gases, it can be liquefied by the same methods. the methods for liquefying air have been simplified greatly in that the low temperature required is obtained by allowing a portion of the compressed air to expand. the expansion of a gas is always attended by the absorption of heat. in liquefying air the apparatus is so constructed that the heat absorbed is withdrawn from air already under great pressure. this process is continued until the temperature is lowered to the point of liquefaction. [illustration: fig. ] ~the dewar bulb.~ it is not possible to preserve air in the liquid state in a closed vessel, on account of the enormous pressure exerted by it in its tendency to pass into the gaseous state. it may however be preserved for some hours or even days before it will completely evaporate, by simply placing it in an open vessel surrounded by a nonconducting material. the most efficient vessel for this purpose is the _dewar bulb_ shown in fig. . the air is withdrawn from the space between the two walls, thus making it nonconducting. ~properties and uses of liquid air.~ when first prepared, liquid air is cloudy because of the presence of particles of solid carbon dioxide. these may be filtered off, leaving a liquid of slightly bluish color. it begins to boil at about - °, the nitrogen passing off first, gradually followed by the oxygen, the last portions being nearly pure oxygen. to a certain extent oxygen is now prepared in this way for commercial purposes. the extremely low temperature of liquid air may be inferred from the fact that mercury when cooled by it is frozen to a mass so hard that it may be used for driving nails. liquid air is used in the preparation of oxygen and as a cooling agent in the study of the properties of matter at low temperatures. it has thus been found that elements at extremely low temperatures largely lose their chemical activity. exercises . when oxygen and nitrogen are mixed in the proportion in which they exist in the atmosphere, heat is neither evolved nor absorbed by the process. what important point does this suggest? . what essential constituent of the air is found in larger amount in manufacturing districts than in the open country? . can you suggest any reason why the growth of clover in a field improves the soil? . why are the inner walls of a dewar bulb sometimes coated with a film of silver? . to what is the blue color of liquid air due? does this color increase in intensity on standing? . when ice is placed in a vessel containing liquid air, the latter boils violently. explain. . taking the volumes of the oxygen and nitrogen in volumes of air as and respectively, calculate the percentages of these elements present by weight. . would combustion be more intense in liquid air than in the gaseous substance? . a tube containing calcium chloride was found to weigh . g. a volume of air which weighed . g. was passed through, after which the weight of the tube was found to be . g. what was the percentage amount of moisture present in the air? . l. of air measured at ° and mm. passed through lime water caused the precipitation of . g. of caco_{ }. find the number of volumes of carbon dioxide in , volumes of the air. chapter ix solutions ~definitions.~ when a substance disappears in a liquid in such a way as to thoroughly mix with it and to be lost to sight as an individual body, the resulting liquid is called a _solution_. the liquid in which the substance dissolves is called the _solvent_, while the dissolved substance is called the _solute_. ~classes of solutions.~ matter in any one of its physical states may dissolve in a liquid, so that we may have solutions of gases, of liquids, and of solids. solutions of liquids in liquids are not often mentioned in the following pages, but the other two classes will become very familiar in the course of our study, and deserve special attention. solution of gases in liquids [illustration: fig. ] it has already been stated that oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen are slightly soluble in water. accurate study has led to the conclusion that all gases are soluble to some extent not only in water but in many other liquids. the amount of a gas which will dissolve in a liquid depends upon a number of conditions, and these can best be understood by supposing a vessel b (fig. ), to be filled with the gas and inverted over the liquid. under these circumstances the gas cannot escape or become mixed with another gas. ~circumstances affecting the solubility of gases.~ a number of circumstances affect the solubility of a gas in a liquid. . _nature of the gas._ other conditions being equal, each gas has its own peculiar solubility, just as it has its own special taste or odor. the solubility of gases varies between wide limits, as will be seen from the following table, but as a rule a given volume of a liquid will not dissolve more than two or three times its own volume of a gas. _solubility of gases in water_ l. of water at mm. pressure and at ° will dissolve: ammonia . l. hydrochloric acid . sulphur dioxide . carbon dioxide . oxygen . cc. hydrogen . nitrogen . in the case of very soluble gases, such as the first three in the table, it is probable that chemical combination between the liquid and the gas takes place. . _nature of the liquid._ the character of the liquid has much influence upon the solubility of a gas. water, alcohol, and ether have each its own peculiar solvent power. from the solubility of a gas in water, no prediction can be made as to its solubility in other liquids. . _influence of pressure._ it has been found that the weight of gas which dissolves in a given case is proportional to the pressure exerted upon the gas. if the pressure is doubled, the weight of gas going into solution is doubled; if the pressure is diminished to one half of its original value, half of the dissolved gas will escape. under high pressure, large quantities of gas can be dissolved in a liquid, and when the pressure is removed the gas escapes, causing the liquid to foam or _effervesce_. . _influence of temperature._ in general, the lower the temperature of the liquid, the larger the quantity of gas which it can dissolve. volumes of water at ° will dissolve . volumes of oxygen; at °, . volumes; at ° none at all. while most gases can be expelled from a liquid by boiling the solution, some cannot. for example, it is not possible to expel hydrochloric acid gas completely from its solution by boiling. solution of solids in liquids this is the most familiar class of solutions, since in the laboratory substances are much more frequently used in the form of solutions than in the solid state. ~circumstances affecting the solubility of a solid.~ the solubility of a solid in a liquid depends upon several factors. . _nature of the solid._ other conditions being the same, solids vary greatly in their solubility in liquids. this is illustrated in the following table: _table of solubility of solids at °_ cc. of water will dissolve: calcium chloride . g. sodium chloride . potassium nitrate . copper sulphate . calcium sulphate . no solids are absolutely insoluble, but the amount dissolved may be so small as to be of no significance for most purposes. thus barium sulphate, one of the most insoluble of common substances, dissolves in water to the extent of part in , . . _nature of the solvent._ liquids vary much in their power to dissolve solids. some are said to be good solvents, since they dissolve a great variety of substances and considerable quantities of them. others have small solvent power, dissolving few substances, and those to a slight extent only. broadly speaking, water is the most general solvent, and alcohol is perhaps second in solvent power. . _temperature._ the weight of a solid which a given liquid can dissolve varies with the temperature. usually it increases rapidly as the temperature rises, so that the boiling liquid dissolves several times the weight which the cold liquid will dissolve. in some instances, as in the case of common salt dissolved in water, the temperature has little influence upon the solubility, and a few solids are more soluble in cold water than in hot. the following examples will serve as illustrations: _table of solubility at ° and at °_ cc. of water will dissolve: at ° at ° calcium chloride . g. . g. sodium chloride . . potassium nitrate . . copper sulphate . . calcium sulphate . . calcium hydroxide . . ~saturated solutions.~ a liquid will not dissolve an unlimited quantity of a solid. on adding the solid to the liquid in small portions at a time, it will be found that a point is reached at which the liquid will not dissolve more of the solid at that temperature. the solid and the solution remain in contact with each other unchanged. this condition may be described by saying that they are in equilibrium with each other. a solution is said to be _saturated_ when it remains unchanged in concentration in contact with some of the solid. the weight of the solid which will completely saturate a definite volume of a liquid at a given temperature is called the _solubility_ of the substance at that temperature. ~supersaturated solutions.~ when a solution, saturated at a given temperature, is allowed to cool it sometimes happens that no solid crystallizes out. this is very likely to occur when the vessel used is perfectly smooth and the solution is not disturbed in any way. such a solution is said to be _supersaturated_. that this condition is unstable can be shown by adding a crystal of the solid to the solution. all of the solid in excess of the quantity required to saturate the solution at this temperature will at once crystallize out, leaving the solution saturated. supersaturation may also be overcome in many cases by vigorously shaking or stirring the solution. ~general physical properties of solutions.~ a few general statements may be made in reference to the physical properties of solutions. . _distribution of the solid in the liquid._ a solid, when dissolved, tends to distribute itself uniformly through the liquid, so that every part of the solution has the same concentration. the process goes on very slowly unless hastened by stirring or shaking the solution. thus, if a few crystals of a highly colored substance such as copper sulphate are placed in the bottom of a tall vessel full of water, it will take weeks for the solution to become uniformly colored. . _boiling points of solutions._ the boiling point of a liquid is raised by the presence of a substance dissolved in it. in general the extent to which the boiling point of a solvent is raised by a given substance is proportional to the concentration of the solution, that is, to the weight of the substance dissolved in a definite weight of the solvent. . _freezing points of solutions._ a solution freezes at a lower temperature than the pure solvent. the lowering of the freezing point obeys the same law which holds for the raising of the boiling point: the extent of lowering is proportional to the weight of dissolved substance, that is, to the concentration of the solution. ~electrolysis of solutions.~ pure water does not appreciably conduct the electric current. if, however, certain substances such as common salt are dissolved in the water, the resulting solutions are found to be conductors of electricity. such solutions are called _electrolytes_. when the current passes through an electrolyte some chemical change always takes place. this change is called _electrolysis_. [illustration: fig. ] the general method used in the electrolysis of a solution is illustrated in fig. . the vessel d contains the electrolyte. two plates or rods, a and b, made of suitable material, are connected with the wires from a battery (or dynamo) and dipped into the electrolyte, as shown in the figure. these plates or rods are called _electrodes_. the electrode connected with the zinc plate of the battery is the negative electrode or _cathode_, while that connected with the carbon plate is the positive electrode or _anode_. ~theory of electrolytic dissociation.~ the facts which have just been described in connection with solutions, together with many others, have led chemists to adopt a theory of solutions called _the theory of electrolytic dissociation_. the main assumptions in this theory are the following. . _formation of ions._ many compounds when dissolved in water undergo an important change. a portion of their molecules fall apart, or _dissociate_, into two or more parts, called _ions_. thus sodium nitrate (nano_{ }) dissociates into the ions na and no_{ }; sodium chloride, into the ions na and cl. these ions are free to move about in the solution independently of each other like independent molecules, and for this reason were given the name ion, which signifies a wanderer. . _the electrical charge of ions._ each ion carries a heavy electrical charge, and in this respect differs from an atom or molecule. it is evident that the sodium in the form of an ion must differ in some important way from ordinary sodium, for sodium ions, formed from sodium nitrate, give no visible evidence of their presence in water, whereas metallic sodium at once decomposes the water. the electrical charge, therefore, greatly modifies the usual chemical properties of the element. . _the positive charges equal the negative charges._ the ions formed by the dissociation of any molecule are of two kinds. one kind is charged with positive electricity and the other with negative electricity; moreover the sum of all the positive charges is always equal to the sum of all the negative charges. the solution as a whole is therefore electrically neutral. if we represent dissociation by the usual chemical equations, with the electrical charges indicated by + and - signs following the symbols, the dissociation of sodium chloride molecules is represented thus: nacl --> na^{+}, cl^{-}. the positive charge on each sodium ion exactly equals the negative charge on each chlorine ion. sodium sulphate dissociates, as shown in the equation na_{ }so_{ } --> na^{+}, so_{ }^{--}. here the positive charge on the two sodium ions equals the double negative charge on the so_{ } ion. . _not all compounds dissociate._ only those compounds dissociate whose solutions form electrolytes. thus salt dissociates when dissolved in water, the resulting solution being an electrolyte. sugar, on the other hand, does not dissociate and its solution is not a conductor of the electric current. . _extent of dissociation differs in different liquids._ while compounds most readily undergo dissociation in water, yet dissociation often occurs to a limited extent when solution takes place in liquids other than water. in the discussion of solutions it will be understood that the solvent is water unless otherwise noted. ~the theory of electrolytic dissociation and the properties of solutions.~ in order to be of value, this theory must give a reasonable explanation of the properties of solutions. let us now see if the theory is in harmony with certain of these properties. ~the theory of electrolytic dissociation and the boiling and freezing points of solutions.~ we have seen that the boiling point of a solution of a substance is raised in proportion to the concentration of the dissolved substance. this is but another way of saying that the change in the boiling point of the solution is proportional to the number of molecules of the dissolved substance present in the solution. it has been found, however, that in the case of electrolytes the boiling point is raised more than it should be to conform to this law. if the solute dissociates into ions, the reason for this becomes clear. each ion has the same effect on the boiling point as a molecule, and since their number is greater than the number of molecules from which they were formed, the effect on the boiling point is abnormally great. in a similar way, the theory furnishes an explanation of the abnormal lowering of the freezing point of electrolytes. ~the theory of electrolytic dissociation and electrolysis.~ the changes taking place during electrolysis harmonize very completely with the theory of dissociation. this will become clear from a study of the following examples. [illustration: fig. ] . _electrolysis of sodium chloride._ fig. represents a vessel in which the electrolyte is a solution of sodium chloride (nacl). according to the dissociation theory the molecules of sodium chloride dissociate into the ions na^{+} and cl^{-}. the na^{+} ions are attracted to the cathode owing to its large negative charge. on coming into contact with the cathode, the na^{+} ions give up their positive charge and are then ordinary sodium atoms. they immediately decompose the water according to the equation na + h_{ }o = naoh + h, and hydrogen is evolved about the cathode. the chlorine ions on being discharged at the anode in similar manner may either be given off as chlorine gas, or may attack the water, as represented in the equation cl + h_{ }o = hcl + o. . _electrolysis of water._ the reason for the addition of sulphuric acid to water in the preparation of oxygen and hydrogen by electrolysis will now be clear. water itself is not an electrolyte to an appreciable extent; that is, it does not form enough ions to carry a current. sulphuric acid dissolved in water is an electrolyte, and dissociates into the ions h^{+} and so_{ }^{--}. in the process of electrolysis of the solution, the hydrogen ions travel to the cathode, and on being discharged escape as hydrogen gas. the so_{ } ions, when discharged at the anode, act upon water, setting free oxygen and once more forming sulphuric acid: so_{ } + h_{ }o = h_{ }so_{ } + o. the sulphuric acid can again dissociate and the process repeat itself as long as any water is left. hence the hydrogen and oxygen set free in the electrolysis of water really come directly from the acid but indirectly from the water. . _electrolysis of sodium sulphate._ in a similar way, sodium sulphate (na_{ }so_{ }), when in solution, gives the ions na^{+} and so_{ }^{--}. on being discharged, the sodium atoms decompose water about the cathode, as in the case of sodium chloride, while the so_{ } ions when discharged at the anode decompose the water, as represented in the equation so_{ } + h_{ }o = h_{ }so_{ } + o [illustration: fig. ] that new substances are formed at the cathode and anode may be shown in the following way. a u-tube, such as is represented in fig. , is partially filled with a solution of sodium sulphate, and the liquid in one arm is colored with red litmus, that in the other with blue litmus. an electrode placed in the red solution is made to serve as cathode, while one in the blue solution is made the anode. on allowing the current to pass, the blue solution turns red, while the red solution turns blue. these are exactly the changes which would take place if sodium hydroxide and sulphuric acid were to be set free at the electrodes, as required by the theory. ~the properties of electrolytes depend upon the ions present.~ when a substance capable of dissociating into ions is dissolved in water, the properties of the solution will depend upon two factors: ( ) the ions formed from the substance; ( ) the undissociated molecules. since the ions are usually more active chemically than the molecules, most of the chemical properties of an electrolyte are due to the ions rather than to the molecules. the solutions of any two substances which give the same ion will have certain properties in common. thus all solutions containing the copper ion (cu^{++}) are blue, unless the color is modified by the presence of ions or molecules having some other color. exercises . distinguish clearly between the following terms: electrolysis, electrolyte, electrolytic dissociation, ions, solute, solvent, solution, saturated solution, and supersaturated solution. . why does the water from some natural springs effervesce? . (a) why does not the water of the ocean freeze? (b) why will ice and salt produce a lower temperature than ice alone? . why does shaking or stirring make a solid dissolve more rapidly in a liquid? . by experiment it was found that a certain volume of water was saturated at ° with g. of potassium nitrate. on cooling to ° a portion of the substance crystallized. (a) how many grams of the substance remained in solution? (b) what was the strength of the solution at °? (c) how much water had been used in the experiment? . (a) g. of common salt were dissolved in water and the solution evaporated to dryness; what weight of solid was left? (b) g. of zinc were dissolved in hydrochloric acid and the solution evaporated to dryness; what weight of solid was left? . account for the fact that sugar sometimes deposits from molasses, even when no evaporation has taken place. . (a) from the standpoint of the theory of electrolytic dissociation, write the simple equation for a dilute solution of copper sulphate (cuso_{ }); this solution is blue. (b) in the same manner, write one for sodium sulphate; this solution is colorless. (c) how would you account for the color of the copper sulphate solution? . (a) as in the preceding exercise, write a simple equation for a dilute solution of copper chloride (cucl_{ }); this solution is blue. (b) in the same manner, write one for sodium chloride; this solution is colorless. to what is the blue color due? . what component is present in concentrated sulphuric acid that is almost wanting in very dilute sulphuric acid? . why will vegetables cook faster when boiled in strong salt water than when boiled in pure water? . how do you explain the foaming of soda water? chapter x acids, bases, and salts; neutralization ~acids, bases, and salts.~ the three classes of compounds known respectively as acids, bases, and salts include the great majority of the compounds with which we shall have to deal. it is important, therefore, for us to consider each of these classes in a systematic way. the individual members belonging to each class will be discussed in detail in the appropriate places, but a few representatives of each class will be described in this chapter with special reference to the common properties in accordance with which they are classified. ~the familiar acids.~ _hydrochloric acid_ is a gas composed of hydrogen and chlorine, and has the formula hcl. the substance is very soluble in water, and it is this solution which is usually called hydrochloric acid. _nitric acid_ is a liquid composed of hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen, having the formula hno_{ }. as sold commercially it is mixed with about % of water. _sulphuric acid_, whose composition is represented by the formula h_{ }so_{ }, is an oily liquid nearly twice as heavy as water, and is commonly called _oil of vitriol_. ~characteristics of acids.~ ( ) all acids contain hydrogen. ( ) when dissolved in water the molecules of the acid dissociate into two kinds of ions. one of these is always hydrogen and is the cation (+), while the other consists of the remainder of the molecule and is the anion (-). ( ) the solution tastes sour. ( ) it has the power to change the color of certain substances called _indicators_. thus blue litmus is changed to red, and yellow methyl orange is changed to red. since all acids produce hydrogen cations, while the anions of each are different, the properties which all acids have in common when in solution, such as taste and action on indicators, must be attributed to the hydrogen ions. definition: _an acid is a substance which produces hydrogen ions when dissolved in water or other dissociating liquids._ ~undissociated acids.~ when acids are perfectly free from water, or are dissolved in liquids like benzene which do not have the power of dissociating them into ions, they should have no real acid properties. this is found to be the case. under these circumstances they do not affect the color of indicators or have any of the properties characteristic of acids. the familiar bases. the bases most used in the laboratory are sodium hydroxide (naoh), potassium hydroxide (koh), and calcium hydroxide (ca(oh)_{ }). these are white solids, soluble in water, the latter sparingly so. some bases are very difficultly soluble in water. the very soluble ones with most pronounced basic properties are sometimes called the _alkalis_. ~characteristics of bases.~ ( ) all bases contain hydrogen and oxygen. ( ) when dissolved in water the molecules of the base dissociate into two kinds of ions. one of these is always composed of oxygen and hydrogen and is the anion. it has the formula oh and is called the _hydroxyl ion_. the remainder of the molecule, which usually consists of a single atom, is the cation. ( ) the solution of a base has a soapy feel and a brackish taste. ( ) it reverses the color change produced in indicators by acids, turning red litmus blue, and red methyl orange yellow. since all bases produce hydroxyl anions, while the cations of each are different, the properties which all bases have in common when in solution must be due to the hydroxyl ions. definition: _a base is a substance which produces hydroxyl ions when dissolved in water or other dissociating liquids._ ~undissociated bases.~ bases, in the absence of water or when dissolved in liquids which do not dissociate them, should have none of the properties characteristic of this class of substances. this has been found to be the case. for example, they have no effect upon indicators under these circumstances. ~neutralization.~ when an acid and a base are brought together in solution in proper proportion, the characteristic properties of each disappear. the solution tastes neither sour nor brackish; it has no effect upon indicators. there can therefore be neither hydrogen nor hydroxyl ions present in the solution. a study of reactions of this kind has shown that the hydrogen ions of the acid combine with the hydroxyl ions of the base to form molecules of water, water being a substance which is not appreciably dissociated into ions. this action of an acid on a base is called _neutralization_. the following equations express the neutralization of the three acids by three bases, water being formed in each case. na^{+}, oh^{-} + h^{+}, cl^{-} = na^{+}, cl^{-} + h_{ }o. k^{+}, oh^{-} + h^{+}, no_{ }^{-} = k^{+}, no_{ }^{-} + h_{ }o. ca^{++}, (oh)_{ }^{--} + h_{ }^{++}, so_{ }^{--} = ca^{++}, so_{ }^{--} + h_{ }o. definition: _neutralization consists in the union of the hydrogen ion of an acid with the hydroxyl ion of a base to form water._ ~salts.~ it will be noticed that in neutralization the anion of the acid and the cation of the base are not changed. if, however, the water is expelled by evaporation, these two ions slowly unite, and when the water becomes saturated with the substance so produced, it separates in the form of a solid called a _salt_. definition: _a salt is a substance formed by the union of the anion of an acid with the cation of a base._ ~characteristics of salts.~ ( ) from the definition of a salt it will be seen that there is no element or group of elements which characterize salts. ( ) salts as a class have no peculiar taste. ( ) in the absence of all other substances they are without action on indicators. ( ) when dissolved in water they form two kinds of ions. ~heat of neutralization.~ if neutralization is due to the union of hydrogen ions with hydroxyl ions, and nothing more, it follows that when a given weight of water is formed in neutralization, the heat set free should always be the same, no matter from what acid and base the two kinds of ions have been supplied. careful experiments have shown that this is the case, provided no other reactions take place at the same time. when g. of water are formed in neutralization, , cal. of heat are set free. this is represented in the equations na^{+}, oh^{-} + h^{+}, cl^{-} = na^{+}, cl^{-} + h_{ }o + , cal. k^{+}, oh^{-} + h^{+}, no_{ }^{-} = k^{+}, no_{ }^{-} + h_{ }o + , cal. ca^{++}, (oh)_{ }^{--} + h_{ }^{++}, so_{ }^{--} = ca^{++}, so_{ }^{--} + h_{ }o + × , cal. ~neutralization a quantitative act.~ since neutralization is a definite chemical act, each acid will require a perfectly definite weight of each base for its neutralization. for example, a given weight of sulphuric acid will always require a definite weight of sodium hydroxide, in accordance with the equation h_{ }, so_{ } + na, oh = na_{ }, so_{ } + h_{ }o. ~determination of the ratio in neutralization.~ the quantities of acid and base required in neutralization may be determined in the following way. dilute solutions of the two substances are prepared, the sulphuric acid being placed in one of the burettes (fig. ) and the sodium hydroxide in the other. the levels of the two liquids are then brought to the zero marks of the burettes by means of the stopcocks. a measured volume of the acid is drawn off into a beaker, a few drops of litmus solution added, and the sodium hydroxide is run in drop by drop until the red litmus just turns blue. the volume of the sodium hydroxide consumed is then noted. if the concentrations of the two solutions are known, it is easy to calculate what weight of sodium hydroxide is required to neutralize a given weight of sulphuric acid. by evaporating the neutralized solution to dryness, the weight of the sodium sulphate formed can be determined directly. experiment shows that the weights are always in accordance with the equation in the preceding paragraph. [illustration: fig. ] ~extent of dissociation.~ the question will naturally arise, when an acid, base, or salt dissolves in water, do all the molecules dissociate into ions, or only a part of them? the experiments by which this question can be answered cannot be described here. it has been found, however, that only a fraction of the molecules dissociate. the percentage which will dissociate in a given case depends upon several conditions, the chief of which are: ( ) the concentration of the solution. in concentrated solutions only a very small percentage of dissociation occurs. as the solution is diluted the percentage increases, and in very dilute solutions it may be very large, though it is never complete in any ordinary solution. ( ) the nature of the dissolved compound. at equal concentrations substances differ much among themselves in the percentage of dissociation. the great majority of salts are about equally dissociated. acids and bases, on the contrary, show great differences. some are freely dissociated, while others are dissociated to but a slight extent. ~strength of acids and bases.~ since acid and basic properties are due to hydrogen and hydroxyl ions respectively, the acid or base which will produce the greatest percentage of these ions at a given concentration must be regarded as the strongest representative of its class. the acids and bases described in the foregoing paragraphs are all quite strong. in % solutions they are dissociated to about %, and this is also approximately the extent to which most salts are dissociated at this same concentration. ~partial neutralization.~ . _basic salts._ the chemical action between an acid and a base is not always as complete as has been represented in the foregoing paragraphs. for example, if the base magnesium hydroxide (mg(oh)_{ }) and hydrochloric acid (hcl) are brought together in the ratio of an equal number of molecules of each, there will be only half enough hydrogen ions for the hydroxyl ions present. mg, (oh)_{ } + h, cl = mg, oh, cl + h_{ }o. magnesium, hydroxyl, and chlorine ions are left at the close of the reaction, and under the proper conditions unite to form molecules of the compound mg(oh)cl. this compound, when dissolved, can form hydroxyl ions and therefore possesses basic properties; it can also form the ions of a salt (mg and cl), and has properties characteristic of salts. substances of this kind are called _basic salts._ definition: _a basic salt is a substance which can give the ions both of a base and of a salt when dissolved in water._ . _acid salts._ in a similar way, when sulphuric acid and sodium hydroxide are brought together in the ratio of equal numbers of the molecules of each, it is possible to have a reaction expressed by the equation na, oh + h_{ }, so_{ } = na, h, so_{ } + h_{ }o. the ions remaining after all the hydroxyl ions have been used up are those of an acid (h) and those of a salt (na and so_{ }). these unite to form the substance nahso_{ }, and as the solution becomes saturated with this substance through evaporation, it separates in the form of crystals. in solution this substance can give hydrogen ions, and therefore possesses acid properties; it can also give the ions characteristic of a salt. it is therefore called an _acid salt_. definition: _an acid salt is one which can give the ions of an acid and of a salt when in solution._ . _normal salts._ salts which are the products of complete neutralization, such as na_{ }so_{ }, and which in solution can give neither hydrogen nor hydroxyl ions, but only the ions of a salt, are called _normal salts_ to distinguish them from acid and basic salts. ~methods of expressing reactions between compounds in solution.~ chemical equations representing reactions between substances in solution may represent the details of the reaction, or they may simply indicate the final products formed. in the latter case the formation of ions is not indicated. thus, if we wish to call attention to the details of the reaction between sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid in solution, the equation is written as follows: na^{+}, oh^{-} + h^{+}, cl^{-} = na^{+}, cl^{-} + h_{ }o. on the other hand, if we wish simply to represent the final products formed, the following is used. naoh + hcl = nacl + h_{ }o. both of these methods will therefore be used: ~radicals.~ it has been emphasized that the hydroxyl group (oh) always forms the anion of a base, while the group no_{ } forms the anion of nitric acid and sodium nitrate; the group so_{ }, the anion of sulphuric acid and calcium sulphate. a group of elements which in this way constitutes a part of a molecule, acting as a unit in a chemical change, or forming ions in solution, is called a _radical_. some of these radicals have been given special names, the names signifying the elements present in the radical. thus we have the hydroxyl radical (oh) and the nitrate radical (no_{ }). definition: _a radical is a group of elements forming part of a molecule, and acting as a unit in chemical reactions._ ~names of acids, bases, and salts.~ since acids, bases, and salts are so intimately related to each other, it is very advantageous to give names to the three classes in accordance with some fixed system. the system universally adopted is as follows: ~naming of bases.~ all bases are called _hydroxides_. they are distinguished from each other by prefixing the name of the element which is in combination with the hydroxyl group. examples: sodium hydroxide (naoh); calcium hydroxide (ca(oh)_{ }); copper hydroxide (cu(oh)_{ }). ~naming of acids.~ the method of naming acids depends upon whether the acid consists of two elements or three. . _binary acids._ acids containing only one element in addition to hydrogen are called _binary acids_. they are given names consisting of the prefix _hydro-_, the name of the second element present, and the termination _-ic_. examples: hydrochloric acid (hcl); hydrosulphuric acid (h_{ }s). . _ternary acids._ in addition to the two elements present in binary acids, the great majority of acids also contain oxygen. they therefore consist of three elements and are called _ternary acids_. it usually happens that the same three elements can unite in different proportions to make several different acids. the most familiar one of these is given a name ending in the suffix _-ic_, while the one with less oxygen is given a similar name, but ending in the suffix _-ous_. examples: nitric acid (hno_{ }); nitrous acid (hno_{ }). in cases where more than two acids are known, use is made of prefixes in addition to the two suffixes _-ic_ and _-ous_. thus the prefix _per-_ signifies an acid still richer in oxygen; the prefix _hypo-_ signifies one with less oxygen. ~naming of salts.~ a salt derived from a binary acid is given a name consisting of the names of the two elements composing it, with the termination _-ide_. example: sodium chloride (nacl). all other binary compounds are named in the same way. a salt of a ternary acid is named in accordance with the acid from which it is derived. a ternary acid with the termination _-ic_ gives a salt with the name ending in _-ate_, while an acid with termination _-ous_ gives a salt with the name ending in _-ite_. the following table will make the application of these principles clear: acids symbol salts symbol hydrochloric hcl sodium chloride nacl hypochlorous hclo sodium hypochlorite naclo chlorous hclo_{ } sodium chlorite naclo_{ } chloric hclo_{ } sodium chlorate naclo_{ } perchloric hclo_{ } sodium perchlorate naclo_{ } exercises . cc. of a solution containing g. of sodium hydroxide per liter was found to neutralize cc. of a solution of hydrochloric acid. what was the strength of the acid solution? . after neutralizing a solution of sodium hydroxide with nitric acid, there remained after evaporation g. of sodium nitrate. how much of each substance had been used? . a solution contains g. of hydrochloric acid per cc. it required cc. of this solution to neutralize cc. of a solution of sodium hydroxide. what was the strength of the sodium hydroxide solution in parts per hundred? . when perfectly dry sulphuric acid is treated with perfectly dry sodium hydroxide, no chemical change takes place. explain. . when cold, concentrated sulphuric acid is added to zinc, no change takes place. recall the action of dilute sulphuric acid on the same metal. how do you account for the difference? . a solution of hydrochloric acid in benzene does not conduct the electric current. when this solution is treated with zinc, will hydrogen be evolved? explain. . (a) write equation for preparation of hydrogen from zinc and dilute sulphuric acid. (b) rewrite the same equation from the standpoint of the theory of electrolytic dissociation, (c) subtract the common so_{ } ion from both members of the equation, (d) from the resulting equation, explain in what the preparation of hydrogen consists when examined from the standpoint of this theory. . in the same manner as in the preceding exercise, explain in what the action of sodium on water to give hydrogen consists. chapter xi valence ~definition of valence.~ a study of the formulas of various binary compounds shows that the elements differ between themselves in the number of atoms of other elements which they are able to hold in combination. this is illustrated in the formulas hcl, h_{ }o, h_{ }n, h_{ }c. (hydrochloric acid) (water) (ammonia) (marsh gas) it will be noticed that while one atom of chlorine combines with one atom of hydrogen, an atom of oxygen combines with two, an atom of nitrogen with three, one of carbon with four. the number which expresses this combining ratio between atoms is a definite property of each element and is called its _valence_. definition: _the valence of an element is that property which determines the number of the atoms of another element which its atom can hold in combination._ ~valence a numerical property.~ valence is therefore merely a numerical relation and does not convey any information in regard to the intensity of the affinity between atoms. judging by the heat liberated in their union, oxygen has a far stronger affinity for hydrogen than does nitrogen, but an atom of oxygen can combine with two atoms only of hydrogen, while an atom of nitrogen can combine with three. ~measure of valence.~ in expressing the valence of an element we must select some standard for comparison, just as in the measurement of any other numerical quantity. it has been found that an atom of hydrogen is never able to hold in combination more than one atom of any other element. hydrogen is therefore taken as the standard, and other elements are compared with it in determining their valence. a number of other elements are like hydrogen in being able to combine with at most one atom of other elements, and such elements are called _univalent_. among these are chlorine, iodine, and sodium. elements such as oxygen, calcium, and zinc, which can combine with two atoms of hydrogen or other univalent elements, are said to be _divalent_. similarly, we have _trivalent, tetravalent, pentavalent_ elements. none have a valence of more than . ~indirect measure of valence.~ many elements, especially among the metals, do not readily form compounds with hydrogen, and their valence is not easy to determine by direct comparison with the standard element. these elements, however, combine with other univalent elements, such as chlorine, and their valence can be determined from the compounds so formed. ~variable valence.~ many elements are able to exert different valences under differing circumstances. thus we have the compounds cu_{ }o and cuo, co and co_{ }, fecl_{ } and fecl_{ }. it is not always possible to assign a fixed valence to an element. nevertheless each element tends to exert some normal valence, and the compounds in which it has a valence different from this are apt to be unstable and easily changed into compounds in which the valence of the element is normal. the valences of the various elements will become familiar as the elements are studied in detail. ~valence and combining ratios.~ when elements combine to form compounds, the ratio in which they combine will be determined by their valences. in those compounds which consist of two elements directly combined, the union is between such numbers of the two atoms as have equal valences. elements of the same valence will therefore combine atom for atom. designating the valence of the atoms by roman numerals placed above their symbols, we have the formulas ii ii ii iii iii iv iv hcl, zno, bn, csi. a divalent element, on the other hand, will combine with two atoms of a univalent element. thus we have ii ii ii ii zncl_{ } and h_{ }o (the numerals above each symbol representing the sum of the valences of the atoms of the element present). a trivalent atom will combine with three atoms of a univalent element, as in the compound iii iii h_{ }n. if a trivalent element combines with a divalent element, the union will be between two atoms of the trivalent element and three of the divalent element, since these numbers are the smallest which have equal valences. thus the oxide of the trivalent metal aluminium has the formula al_{ }o_{ }. finally one atom of a tetravalent element such as carbon will combine with four atoms of a univalent element, as in the compound ch_{ }, or with two atoms of a divalent element, as in the compound co_{ }. we have no knowledge as to why elements differ in their combining power, and there is no way to determine their valences save by experiment. ~valence and the structure of compounds.~ compounds will be met from time to time which are apparent exceptions to the general statements just made in regard to valence. thus, from the formula for hydrogen dioxide (h_{ }o_{ }), it might be supposed that the oxygen is univalent; yet it is certainly divalent in water (h_{ }o). that it may also be divalent in h_{ }o_{ } may be made clear as follows: the unit valence of each element may be represented graphically by a line attached to its symbol. univalent hydrogen and divalent oxygen will then have the symbols h- and -o-. when atoms combine, each unit valence of one atom combines with a unit valence of another atom. thus the composition of water may be expressed by the formula h-o-h, which is meant to show that each of the unit valences of oxygen is satisfied with the unit valence of a single hydrogen atom. the chemical conduct of hydrogen dioxide leads to the conclusion that the two oxygen atoms of its molecule are in direct combination with each other, and in addition each is in combination with a hydrogen atom. this may be expressed by the formula h-o-o-h. the oxygen in the compound is therefore divalent, just as it is in water. it will thus be seen that the structure of a compound must be known before the valences of the atoms making up the compound can be definitely decided upon. such formulas as h-o-h and h-o-o-h are known as _structural formulas_, because they are intended to show what is known in regard to the arrangement of the atoms in the molecules. ~valence and the replacing power of atoms.~ just as elements having the same valence combine with each other atom for atom, so if they replace each other in a chemical reaction they will do so in the same ratio. this is seen in the following equations, in which a univalent hydrogen atom is replaced by a univalent sodium atom: naoh + hcl = nacl + h_{ }o. naoh + h_{ }so_{ } = na_{ }so_{ } + h_{ }o. na + h_{ }o = naoh + h. similarly, one atom of divalent calcium will replace two atoms of univalent hydrogen or one of divalent zinc: ca(oh)_{ } + hcl = cacl_{ } + h_{ }o. cacl_{ } + znso_{ } = caso_{ } + zncl_{ }. in like manner, one atom of a trivalent element will replace three of a univalent element, or two atoms will replace three atoms of a divalent element. ~valence and its applications to formulas of salts.~ while the true nature of valence is not understood and many questions connected with the subject remain unanswered, yet many of the main facts are of much help to the student. thus the formula of a salt, differs from that of the acid from which it is derived in that the hydrogen of the acid has been replaced by a metal. if, then, it is known that a given metal forms a normal salt with a certain acid, the formula of the salt can at once be determined if the valence of the metal is known. since sodium is univalent, the sodium salts of the acids hcl and h_{ }so_{ } will be respectively nacl and na_{ }so_{ }. one atom of divalent zinc will replace hydrogen atoms, so that the corresponding zinc salts will be zncl_{ } and znso_{ }. the formula for aluminium sulphate is somewhat more difficult to determine. aluminium is trivalent, and the simplest ratio in which the aluminium atom can replace the hydrogen in sulphuric acid is atoms of aluminium ( valences) to molecules of sulphuric acid ( hydrogen atoms). the formula of the sulphate will then be al_{ }(so_{ })_{ }. ~valence and its application to equation writing.~ it will be readily seen that a knowledge of valence is also of very great assistance in writing the equations for reactions of double decomposition. thus, in the general reaction between an acid and a base, the essential action is between the univalent hydrogen ion and the univalent hydroxyl ion. the base and the acid must always be taken in such proportions as to secure an equal number of each of these ions. thus, in the reaction between ferric hydroxide (fe(oh)_{ }) and sulphuric acid (h_{ }so_{ }), it will be necessary to take molecules of the former and of the latter in order to have an equal number of the two ions, namely, . the equation will then be fe(oh)_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } = fe_{ }(so_{ })_{ } + h_{ }o. under certain conditions the salts al_{ }(so_{ })_{ } and cacl_{ } undergo double decomposition, the two metals, aluminium and calcium, exchanging places. the simplest ratio of exchange in this case is atoms of aluminium ( valences) and atoms of calcium ( valences). the reaction will therefore take place between molecule of al_{ }(so_{ })_{ } and of cacl_{ }, and the equation is as follows: al_{ }(so_{ })_{ } + cacl_{ } = caso_{ } + alcl_{ }. exercises . sodium, calcium, and aluminium have valences of , , and respectively; write the formulas of their chlorides, sulphates, and phosphates (phosphoric acid = h_{ }po_{ }), on the supposition that they form salts having the normal composition. . iron forms one series of salts in which it has a valence of , and another series in which it has a valence of ; write the formulas for the two chlorides of iron, also for the two sulphates, on the supposition that these have the normal composition. . write the equation representing the neutralization of each of the following bases by each of the acids whose formulas are given: naoh hcl ba(oh)_{ } h_{ }so_{ } al(oh)_{ } h_{ }po_{ } . silver acts as a univalent element and calcium as a divalent element in the formation of their respective nitrates and chlorides. (a) write the formula for silver nitrate; for calcium chloride. (b) when solutions of these two salts are mixed, the two metals, silver and calcium, exchange places; write the equation for the reaction. _ ._ antimony acts as a trivalent element in the formation of a chloride. (a) what is the formula for antimony chloride? (b) when hydrosulphuric acid (h_{ }s) is passed into a solution of this chloride the hydrogen and antimony exchange places; write the equation for the reaction. . lead has a valence of and iron of in the compounds known respectively as lead nitrate and ferric sulphate. (a) write the formulas for these two compounds. (b) when their solutions are mixed the two metals exchange places; write the equation for the reaction. chapter xii compounds of nitrogen ~occurrence.~ as has been stated in a former chapter, nitrogen constitutes a large fraction of the atmosphere. the compounds of nitrogen, however, cannot readily be obtained from this source, since at any ordinary temperature nitrogen is able to combine directly with very few of the elements. in certain forms of combination nitrogen occurs in the soil from which it is taken up by plants and built into complex substances composed chiefly of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen. animals feeding on these plants assimilate the nitrogenous matter, so that this element is an essential constituent of both plants and animals. ~decomposition of organic matter by bacteria.~ when living matter dies and undergoes decay complicated chemical reactions take place, one result of which is that the nitrogen of the organic matter is set free either as the element nitrogen, or in the form of simple compounds, such as ammonia (nh_{ }) or oxides of nitrogen. experiment has shown that all such processes of decay are due to the action of different kinds of bacteria, each particular kind effecting a different change. ~decomposition of organic matter by heat.~ when organic matter is strongly heated decomposition into simpler substances takes place in much the same way as in the case of bacterial decomposition. coal is a complex substance of vegetable origin, consisting largely of carbon, but also containing hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen. when this is heated in a closed vessel so that air is excluded, about one seventh of the nitrogen is converted into ammonia, and this is the chief source from which ammonia and its compounds are obtained. compounds of nitrogen with hydrogen ~ammonia~ (nh_{ }). several compounds consisting exclusively of nitrogen and hydrogen are known, but only one, ammonia, need be considered here. ~preparation of ammonia.~ ammonia is prepared in the laboratory by a different method from the one which is used commercially. . _laboratory method._ in the laboratory ammonia is prepared from ammonium chloride, a compound having the formula nh_{ }cl, and obtained in the manufacture of coal gas. as will be shown later in the chapter, the group nh_{ } in this compound acts as a univalent radical and is known as _ammonium_. when ammonium chloride is warmed with sodium hydroxide, the ammonium and sodium change places, the reaction being expressed in the following equation. nh_{ }cl + naoh = nacl + nh_{ }oh. the ammonium hydroxide (nh_{ }oh) so formed is unstable and breaks down into water and ammonia. nh_{ }oh = nh_{ } + h_{ }o. calcium hydroxide (ca(oh)_{ }) is frequently used in place of the more expensive sodium hydroxide, the equations being nh_{ }cl + ca(oh)_{ } = cacl_{ } + nh_{ }oh, nh_{ }oh = h_{ }o + nh_{ }. in the preparation, the ammonium chloride and calcium hydroxide are mixed together and placed in a flask arranged as shown in fig. . the mixture is gently warmed, when ammonia is evolved as a gas and is collected by displacement of air. [illustration: fig. ] . _commercial method._ nearly all the ammonia of commerce comes from the gasworks. ordinary illuminating gas is made by distilling coal, as will be explained later, and among the products of this distillation a solution of ammonia in water is obtained. this solution, known as _gas liquor_, contains not only ammonia but other soluble substances. most of these combine chemically with lime, while ammonia does not; if then lime is added to the gas liquor and the liquor is heated, the ammonia is driven out from the mixture. it may be dissolved again in pure, cold water, forming _aqua ammonia_, or the ammonia water of commerce. ~preparation from hydrogen and nitrogen.~ when electric sparks are passed for some time through a mixture of hydrogen and nitrogen, a small percentage of the two elements in the mixture is changed into ammonia. the action soon ceases, however, for the reason that ammonia is decomposed by the electric discharge. the reaction expressed in the equation n + h = nh_{ } can therefore go in either direction depending upon the relative quantities of the substances present. this recalls the similar change from oxygen into ozone, which soon ceases because the ozone is in turn decomposed into oxygen. ~physical properties.~ under ordinary conditions ammonia is a gas whose density is . . it is therefore little more than half as heavy as air. it is easily condensed into a colorless liquid, and can now be purchased in liquid form in steel cylinders. the gas is colorless and has a strong, suffocating odor. it is extremely soluble in water, l. of water at ° and mm. pressure dissolving l. of the gas. in dissolving this large volume of gas the water expands considerably, so that the density of the solution is less than that of water, the strongest solutions having a density of . . ~chemical properties.~ ammonia will not support combustion, nor will it burn under ordinary conditions. in an atmosphere of oxygen it burns with a feeble, yellowish flame. when quite dry it is not a very active substance, but when moist it combines with a great many substances, particularly with acids. ~uses.~ it has been stated that ammonia can be condensed to a liquid by the application of pressure. if the pressure is removed from the liquid so obtained, it rapidly passes again into the gaseous state and in so doing absorbs a large amount of heat. advantage is taken of this fact in the preparation of artificial ice. large quantities of ammonia are also used in the preparation of ammonium compounds. ~the manufacture of artificial ice.~ fig. illustrates the method of preparing artificial ice. the ammonia gas is liquefied in the pipes x by means of the pump y. the heat generated is absorbed by water flowing over the pipes. the pipes lead into a large brine tank, a cross section of which is shown in the figure. into the brine (concentrated solution of common salt) contained in this tank are dipped the vessels a, b, c, filled with pure water. the pressure is removed from the liquid ammonia as it passes into the pipes immersed in the brine, and the heat absorbed by the rapid evaporation of the liquid lowers the temperature of the brine below zero. the water in a, b, c is thereby frozen into cakes of ice. the gaseous ammonia resulting from the evaporation of the liquid ammonia is again condensed, so that the process is continuous. [illustration fig. ] ~ammonium hydroxide~ (nh_{ }oh). the solution of ammonia in water is found to have strong basic properties and therefore contains hydroxyl ions. it turns red litmus blue; it has a soapy feel; it neutralizes acids, forming salts with them. it seems probable, therefore, that when ammonia dissolves in water it combines chemically with it according to the equation nh_{ } + h_{ }o = nh_{ }oh, and that it is the substance nh_{ }oh, called ammonium hydroxide, which has the basic properties, dissociating into the ions nh_{ } and oh. ammonium hydroxide has never been obtained in a pure state. at every attempt to isolate it the substance breaks up into water and ammonia,-- nh_{ }oh = nh_{ } + h_{ }o. ~the ammonium radical.~ the radical nh_{ } plays the part of a metal in many chemical reactions and is called ammonium. the ending _-ium_ is given to the name to indicate the metallic properties of the substance, since the names of the metals in general have that ending. the salts formed by the action of the base ammonium hydroxide on acids are called ammonium salts. thus, with hydrochloric acid, ammonium chloride is formed in accordance with the equation nh_{ }oh + hcl = nh_{ }cl + h_{ }o. similarly, with nitric acid, ammonium nitrate (nh_{ }no_{ }) is formed, and with sulphuric acid, ammonium sulphate ((nh_{ })_{ }s _{ }). it will be noticed that in the neutralization of ammonium hydroxide by acids the group nh_{ } replaces one hydrogen atom of the acid, just as sodium does. the group therefore acts as a univalent metal. ~combination of nitrogen with hydrogen by volume.~ under suitable conditions ammonia can be decomposed into nitrogen and hydrogen by passing electric sparks through the gas. accurate measurement has shown that when ammonia is decomposed, two volumes of the gas yield one volume of nitrogen and three volumes of hydrogen. consequently, if the two elements were to combine directly, one volume of nitrogen would combine with three volumes of hydrogen to form two volumes of ammonia. here, as in the formation of steam from hydrogen and oxygen, small whole numbers serve to indicate the relation between the volumes of combining gases and that of the gaseous product. compounds of nitrogen with oxygen and hydrogen in addition to ammonium hydroxide, nitrogen forms several compounds with hydrogen and oxygen, of which nitric acid (hno_{ }) and nitrous acid (hno_{ }) are the most familiar. ~nitric acid~ (hno_{ }). nitric acid is not found to any extent in nature, but some of its salts, especially sodium nitrate (nano_{ }) and potassium nitrate (kno_{ }) are found in large quantities. from these salts nitric acid can be obtained. [illustration fig. ] ~preparation of nitric acid.~ when sodium nitrate is treated with concentrated cold sulphuric acid, no chemical action seems to take place. if, however, the mixture is heated in a retort, nitric acid is given off as a vapor and may be easily condensed to a liquid by passing the vapor into a tube surrounded by cold water, as shown in fig. . an examination of the liquid left in the retort shows that it contains sodium acid sulphate (nahso_{ }), so that the reaction may be represented by the equation nano_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } = nahso_{ } + hno_{ }. if a smaller quantity of sulphuric acid is taken and the mixture is heated to a high temperature, normal sodium sulphate is formed: nano_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } = na_{ }so_{ } + hno_{ }. in this case, however, the higher temperature required decomposes a part of the nitric acid. ~the commercial preparation of nitric acid.~ fig. illustrates a form of apparatus used in the preparation of nitric acid on a large scale. sodium nitrate and sulphuric acid are heated in the iron retort a. the resulting acid vapors pass in the direction indicated by the arrows, and are condensed in the glass tubes b, which are covered with cloth kept cool by streams of water. these tubes are inclined so that the liquid resulting from the condensation of the vapors runs back into c and is drawn off into large vessels (d). [illustration fig. ] ~physical properties of nitric acid.~ pure nitric acid is a colorless liquid, which boils at about ° and has a density of . . the concentrated acid of commerce contains about % of the acid, the remainder being water. such a mixture has a density of . . the concentrated acid fumes somewhat in moist air, and has a sharp choking odor. ~chemical properties.~ the most important chemical properties of nitric acid are the following. . _acid properties._ as the name indicates, this substance is an acid, and has all the properties of that class of substances. it changes blue litmus red and has a sour taste in dilute solutions. it forms hydrogen ions in solution and neutralizes bases forming salts. it also acts upon the oxides of most metals, forming a salt and water. it is one of the strongest acids. . _decomposition on heating._ when boiled, or exposed for some time to sunlight, it suffers a partial decomposition according to the equation hno_{ } = h_{ }o + no_{ } + o. the substance no_{ }, called nitrogen peroxide, is a brownish gas, which is readily soluble in water and in nitric acid. it therefore dissolves in the undecomposed acid, and imparts a yellowish or reddish color to it. concentrated nitric acid highly charged with this substance is called _fuming nitric acid_. . _oxidizing action._ according to its formula, nitric acid contains a large percentage of oxygen, and the reaction just mentioned shows that the compound is not a very stable one, easily undergoing decomposition. these properties should make it a good oxidizing agent, and we find that this is the case. under ordinary circumstances, when acting as an oxidizing agent, it is decomposed according to the equation hno_{ } = h_{ }o + no + o. the oxygen is taken up by the substance oxidized, and not set free, as is indicated in the equation. thus, if carbon is oxidized by nitric acid, the oxygen combines with carbon, forming carbon dioxide (co_{ }): c + o = co_{ }. . _action on metals._ we have seen that when an acid acts upon a metal hydrogen is set free. accordingly, when nitric acid acts upon a metal, such as copper, we should expect the reaction to take place which is expressed in the equation cu + hno_{ } = cu(no_{ })_{ } + h. this reaction does take place, but the hydrogen set free is immediately oxidized to water by another portion of the nitric acid according to the equation hno_{ } + h = h_{ }o + no. as these two equations are written, two atoms of hydrogen are given off in the first equation, while three are used up in the second. in order that the hydrogen may be equal in the two equations, we must multiply the first by and the second by . we shall then have cu + hno_{ } = cu(no_{ })_{ } + h, hno_{ } + h = h_{ }o + no. the two equations may now be combined into one by adding the quantities on each side of the equality sign, canceling the hydrogen which is given off in the one reaction and used up in the other. we shall then have the equation cu + hno_{ } = cu(no_{ })_{ } + no + h_{ }o. a number of other reactions may take place when nitric acid acts upon metals, resulting in the formation of other oxides of nitrogen, free nitrogen, or even ammonia. the reaction just given is, however, the usual one. ~importance of steps in a reaction.~ this complete equation has the advantage of making it possible to calculate very easily the proportions in which the various substances enter into the reaction or are formed in it. it is unsatisfactory in that it does not give full information about the way in which the reaction takes place. for example, it does not suggest that hydrogen is at first formed, and subsequently transformed into water. it is always much more important to remember the steps in a chemical reaction than to remember the equation expressing the complete action; for if these steps in the reaction are understood, the complete equation is easily obtained in the manner just described. ~salts of nitric acid,--nitrates.~ the salts of nitric acid are called nitrates. many of these salts will be described in the study of the metals. they are all soluble in water, and when heated to a high temperature undergo decomposition. in a few cases a nitrate on being heated evolves oxygen, forming a nitrite: nano_{ } = nano_{ } + o. in other cases the decomposition goes further, and the metal is left as oxide: cu(no_{ })_{ } = cuo + no_{ } + o. ~nitrous acid~ (hno_{ }). it is an easy matter to obtain sodium nitrite (nano_{ }), as the reaction given on the previous page indicates. instead of merely heating the nitrate, it is better to heat it together with a mild reducing agent, such as lead, when the reaction takes place which is expressed by the equation nano_{ } + pb = pbo + nano_{ }. when sodium nitrite is treated with an acid, such as sulphuric acid, it is decomposed and nitrous acid is set free: nano_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } = nahso_{ } + hno_{ }. the acid is very unstable, however, and decomposes readily into water and nitrogen trioxide (n_{ }o_{ }): hno_{ } = h_{ }o + n_{ }o_{ }. dilute solutions of the acid, however, can be obtained. compounds of nitrogen with oxygen nitrogen combines with oxygen to form five different oxides. the formulas and names of these are as follows: n_{ }o nitrous oxide. no nitric oxide. no_{ } nitrogen peroxide. n_{ }o_{ } nitrogen trioxide, or nitrous anhydride. n_{ }o_{ } nitrogen pentoxide, or nitric anhydride. these will now be briefly discussed. ~nitrous oxide~ (_laughing gas_) (n_{ }o). ammonium nitrate, like all nitrates, undergoes decomposition when heated; and owing to the fact that it contains no metal, but does contain both oxygen and hydrogen, the reaction is a peculiar one. it is represented by the equation nh_{ }no_{ } = h_{ }o + n_{ }o. the oxide of nitrogen so formed is called nitrous oxide or laughing gas. it is a colorless gas having a slight odor. it is somewhat soluble in water, and in solution has a slightly sweetish taste. it is easily converted into a liquid and can be purchased in this form. when inhaled it produces a kind of hysteria (hence the name "laughing gas"), and even unconsciousness and insensibility to pain if taken in large amounts. it has long been used as an anæsthetic for minor surgical operations, such as those of dentistry, but owing to its unpleasant after effects it is not so much in use now as formerly. chemically, nitrous oxide is remarkable for the fact that it is a very energetic oxidizing agent. substances such as carbon, sulphur, iron, and phosphorus burn in it almost as brilliantly as in oxygen, forming oxides and setting free nitrogen. evidently the oxygen in nitrous oxide cannot be held in very firm combination by the nitrogen. [illustration fig. ] ~nitric oxide~ (no). we have seen that when nitric acid acts upon metals, such as copper, the reaction represented by the following equation takes place: cu + hno_{ } = cu(no_{ })_{ } + no + h_{ }o. nitric oxide is most conveniently prepared in this way. the metal is placed in the flask a (fig. ) and the acid added slowly through the funnel tube b. the gas escapes through c and is collected over water. pure nitric oxide is a colorless gas, slightly heavier than air, and is practically insoluble in water. it is a difficult gas to liquefy. unlike nitrous oxide, nitric oxide does not part with its oxygen easily, and burning substances introduced into this gas are usually extinguished. a few substances like phosphorus, which have a very strong affinity for oxygen and which are burning energetically in the air, will continue to burn in an atmosphere of nitric oxide. in this case the nitric oxide loses all of its oxygen and the nitrogen is set free as gas. ~action of nitric oxide with oxygen.~ when nitric oxide comes into contact with oxygen or with the air, it at once combines with the oxygen even at ordinary temperatures, forming a reddish-yellow gas of the formula no_{ }, which is called nitrogen peroxide. this action is not energetic enough to produce a flame, though considerable heat is set free. ~nitrogen peroxide~ (no_{ }). this gas, as we have just seen, is formed by allowing nitric oxide to come into contact with oxygen. it can also be made by heating certain nitrates, such as lead nitrate: pb(no_{ })_{ } = pbo + no_{ } + o. it is a reddish-yellow gas of unpleasant odor, which is quite poisonous when inhaled. it is heavier than air and is easily condensed to a liquid. it dissolves in water, but this solution is not a mere physical solution; the nitrogen peroxide is decomposed, forming a mixture of nitric and nitrous acids: no_{ } + h_{ }o = hno_{ } + hno_{ }. nitrogen peroxide will not combine with more oxygen; it will, however, give up a part of its oxygen to burning substances, acting as an oxidizing agent: no_{ } = no + o. ~acid anhydrides.~ the oxides n_{ }o_{ } (nitrogen trioxide) and n_{ }o_{ } (nitrogen pentoxide) are rarely prepared and need not be separately described. they bear a very interesting relation to the acids of nitrogen. when dissolved in water they combine with the water, forming acids: n_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o = hno_{ }, n_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o = hno_{ }. on the other hand, nitrous acid very easily decomposes, yielding water and nitrogen trioxide, and by suitable means nitric acid likewise may be decomposed into water and nitrogen pentoxide: hno_{ } = h_{ }o + n_{ }o_{ }, hno_{ } = h_{ }o + n_{ }o_{ }. in view of the close relation between these oxides and the corresponding acids, they are called _anhydrides_ of the acids, n_{ }o_{ } being nitrous anhydride and n_{ }o_{ } nitric anhydride. definition: _any oxide which will combine with water to form an acid, or which together with water is formed by the decomposition of an acid, is called an anhydride of that acid._ exercises . perfectly dry ammonia does not affect litmus paper. explain. . can ammonia be dried by passing the gas through concentrated sulphuric acid? explain. . ammonium hydroxide is a weak base, i.e. it is not highly dissociated. when it is neutralized by strong acids the heat of reaction is less than when strong bases are so neutralized. suggest some possible cause for this. . why is brine used in the manufacture of artificial ice? . discuss the energy changes which take place in the manufacture of artificial ice. . what weight of ammonium chloride is necessary to furnish enough ammonia to saturate l. of water at ° and mm.? . what weight of sodium nitrate is necessary to prepare cc. of commercial nitric acid? what weight of potassium nitrate is necessary to furnish the same weight of acid? . l. of nitrogen peroxide were dissolved in water and neutralized with sodium hydroxide. what substances were formed and how much of each?( l. nitrogen peroxide weighs . grams.) . how many liters of nitrous oxide, measured under standard conditions, can be prepared from g. of ammonium nitrate? . what weight of copper is necessary to prepare l. of nitric oxide under standard conditions? . (a) calculate the percentage composition of the oxides of nitrogen. (b) what important law does this series of substances illustrate? . write the equations representing the reactions between ammonium hydroxide, and sulphuric acid and nitric acid respectively, in accordance with the theory of electrolytic dissociation. . in the same way, write the equations representing the reactions between nitric acid and each of the following bases: naoh, koh, nh_{ }oh, ca(oh)_{ }. chapter xiii reversible reactions and chemical equilibrium ~reversible reactions.~ the reactions so far considered have been represented as continuing, when once started, until one or the other substance taking part in the reaction has been used up. in some reactions this is not the case. for example, we have seen that when steam is passed over hot iron the reaction is represented by the equation fe + h_{ }o = fe_{ }o_{ } + h. on the other hand, when hydrogen is passed over hot iron oxide the reverse reaction takes place: fe_{ }o_{ } + h = fe + h_{ }o. the reaction can therefore go in either direction, depending upon the conditions of the experiment. such a reaction is called a _reversible reaction_. it is represented by an equation with double arrows in place of the equality sign, thus: fe + h_{ }o <--> fe_{ }o_{ } + h. in a similar way, the equation n + h <--> nh_{ } expresses the fact that under some conditions nitrogen may unite with hydrogen to form ammonia, while under other conditions ammonia decomposes into nitrogen and hydrogen. the conversion of oxygen into ozone is also reversible and may be represented thus: oxygen <--> ozone. ~chemical equilibrium.~ reversible reactions do not usually go on to completion in one direction unless the conditions under which the reaction takes place are very carefully chosen. thus, if iron and steam are confined in a heated tube, the steam acts upon the iron, producing iron oxide and hydrogen. but these substances in turn act upon each other to form iron and steam once more. when these two opposite reactions go on at such rates that the weight of the iron changed into iron oxide is just balanced by the weight of the iron oxide changed into iron, there will be no further change in the relative weights of the four substances present in the tube. the reaction is then said to have reached an equilibrium. ~factors which determine the point of equilibrium.~ there are two factors which have a great deal of influence in determining the point at which a given reaction will reach equilibrium. . _influence of the chemical nature of the substances._ if two reversible reactions of the same general kind are selected, it has been found that the point of equilibrium is different in the two cases. for example, in the reactions represented by the equations fe + h_{ }o <--> fe_{ }o_{ } + h, zn + h_{ }o <--> zno + h, the equilibrium will be reached when very different quantities of the iron and zinc have been changed into oxides. the individual chemical properties of the iron and zinc have therefore marked influence upon the point at which equilibrium will be reached. . _influence of relative mass._ if the tube in which the reaction fe + h_{ }o <--> fe_{ }o_{ } + h has come to an equilibrium is opened and more steam is admitted, an additional quantity of the iron will be changed into iron oxide. if more hydrogen is admitted, some of the oxide will be reduced to metal. the point of equilibrium is therefore dependent upon the relative masses of the substances taking part in the reaction. when one of the substances is a solid, however, its mass has little influence, since it is only the extent of its surface which can affect the reaction. ~conditions under which reversible reactions are complete.~ if, when the equilibrium between iron and steam has been reached, the tube is opened and a current of steam is passed in, the hydrogen is swept away as fast as it is formed. the opposing reaction of hydrogen upon iron oxide must therefore cease, and the action of steam on the iron will go on until all of the iron has been transformed into iron oxide. on the other hand, if a current of hydrogen is admitted into the tube, the steam will be swept away by the hydrogen, and all of the iron oxide will be reduced to iron. _a reversible reaction can therefore be completed in either direction when one of the products of the reaction is removed as fast as it is formed._ ~equilibrium in solution.~ when reactions take place in solution in water the same general principles hold good. the matter is not so simple, however, as in the case just described, owing to the fact that many of the reactions in solution are due to the presence of ions. the substances most commonly employed in solution are acids, bases, or salts, and all of these undergo dissociation. any equilibrium which may be reached in solutions of these substances must take place between the various ions formed, on the one hand, and the undissociated molecules, on the other. thus, when nitric acid is dissolved in water, equilibrium is reached in accordance with the equation h^{+} + no_{ }^{-} <--> hno_{ }. ~conditions under which reversible reactions in solution are complete.~ the equilibrium between substances in solution may be disturbed and the reaction caused to go on in one direction to completion in either of three ways. . _a gas may be formed which escapes from the solution._ when sodium nitrate and sulphuric acid are brought together in solution all four ions, na^{+}, no_{ }^{-}, h^{+}, so_{ }^{--}, are formed. these ions are free to rearrange themselves in various combinations. for example, the h^{+} and the no_{ }^{-} ions will reach the equilibrium h^{+} + no_{ }^{-} <--> hno_{ }. if the experiment is performed with very little water present, as is the case in the preparation of nitric acid, the equilibrium will be reached when most of the h^{+} and the no_{ }^{-} ions have combined to form undissociated hno_{ }. finally, if the mixture is now heated above the boiling point of nitric acid, the acid distills away as fast as it is formed. more and more h^{+} and no_{ }^{-} ions will then combine, and the process will continue until one or the other of them has all been removed from the solution. the substance remaining is sodium acid sulphate (nahso_{ }), and the reaction can therefore be expressed by the equation nano_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } = nahso_{ } + hno_{ }. . _an insoluble solid may be formed._ when hydrochloric acid (hcl) and silver nitrate (agno_{ }) are brought together in solution the following ions will be present: h^{+}, cl^{-}, ag^{+}, no_{ }^{-}. the ions ag^{+} and cl^{-} will then set up the equilibrium ag^{+} + cl^{-} <--> agcl. but silver chloride (agcl) is almost completely insoluble in water, and as soon as a very little of it has formed the solution becomes supersaturated, and the excess of the salt precipitates. more silver and chlorine ions then unite, and this continues until practically all of the silver or the chlorine ions have been removed from the solution. we then say that the following reaction is complete: agno_{ } + hcl = agcl + hno_{ }. . _two different ions may form undissociated molecules._ in the neutralization of sodium hydroxide by hydrochloric acid the ions h^{+} and oh^{-} come to the equilibrium h^{+} + oh^{-} <--> h_{ }o. but since water is almost entirely undissociated, equilibrium can only be reached when there are very few hydroxyl or hydrogen ions present. consequently the two ions keep uniting until one or the other of them is practically removed from the solution. when this occurs the neutralization expressed in the following equation is complete: naoh + hcl = h_{ }o + nacl. ~preparation of acids.~ the principle of reversible reactions finds practical application in the preparation of most of the common acids. an acid is usually prepared by treating the most common of its salts with some other acid of high boiling point. the mixture is then heated until the lower boiling acid desired distills out. owing to its high boiling point ( °), sulphuric acid is usually employed for this purpose, most other acids boiling below that temperature. exercises . what would take place when solutions of silver nitrate and sodium chloride are brought together? what other chlorides would act in the same way? . is the reaction expressed by the equation nh_{ } + h_{ }o = nh_{ }oh reversible? if so, state the conditions under which it will go in each direction. . is the reaction expressed by the equation h + o = h_{ }o reversible? if so, state the conditions under which it will go in each direction. . suggest a method for the preparation of hydrochloric acid. chapter xiv sulphur and its compounds ~occurrence.~ the element sulphur has been known from the earliest times, since it is widely distributed in nature and occurs in large quantities in the uncombined form, especially in the neighborhood of volcanoes. sicily has long been famous for its sulphur mines, and smaller deposits are found in italy, iceland, mexico, and especially in louisiana, where it is mined extensively. in combination, sulphur occurs abundantly in the form of sulphides and sulphates. in smaller amounts it is found in a great variety of minerals, and it is a constituent of many animal and vegetable substances. ~extraction of sulphur.~ sulphur is prepared from the native substance, the separation of crude sulphur from the rock and earthy materials with which it is mixed being a very simple process. the ore from the mines is merely heated until the sulphur melts and drains away from the earthy impurities. the crude sulphur obtained in this way is distilled in a retort-shaped vessel made of iron, the exit tube of which opens into a cooling chamber of brickwork. when the sulphur vapor first enters the cooling chamber it condenses as a fine crystalline powder called _flowers of sulphur_. as the condensing chamber becomes warm, the sulphur collects as a liquid in it, and is drawn off into cylindrical molds, the product being called _roll sulphur_ or _brimstone_. ~physical properties.~ roll sulphur is a pale yellow, crystalline solid, without marked taste and with but a faint odor. it is insoluble in water, but is freely soluble in a few liquids, notably in carbon disulphide. roll sulphur melts at . °. just above the melting point it forms a rather thin, straw-colored liquid. as the temperature is raised, this liquid turns darker in color and becomes thicker, until at about ° it is almost black and is so thick that the vessel containing it can be inverted without danger of the liquid running out. at higher temperatures it becomes thin once more, and boils at °, forming a yellowish vapor. on cooling the same changes take place in reverse order. ~varieties of sulphur.~ sulphur is known in two general forms, crystalline and amorphous. each of these forms exists in definite modifications. ~crystalline sulphur.~ sulphur occurs in two crystalline forms, namely, rhombic sulphur and monoclinic sulphur. . _rhombic sulphur._ when sulphur crystallizes from its solution in carbon disulphide it separates in crystals which have the same color and melting point as roll sulphur, and are rhombic in shape. roll sulphur is made up of minute rhombic crystals. . _monoclinic sulphur._ when melted sulphur is allowed to cool until a part of the liquid has solidified, and the remaining liquid is then poured off, it is found that the solid sulphur remaining in the vessel has assumed the form of fine needle-shaped crystals. these differ much in appearance from the rhombic crystals obtained by crystallizing sulphur from its solution in carbon disulphide. the needle-shaped form is called _monoclinic sulphur_. the two varieties differ also in density and in melting point, the monoclinic sulphur melting at °. monoclinic and rhombic sulphur remain unchanged in contact with each other at °. above this temperature the rhombic changes into monoclinic; at lower temperatures the monoclinic changes into rhombic. the temperature ° is therefore called the transition point of sulphur. heat is set free when monoclinic sulphur changes into rhombic. ~amorphous sulphur.~ two varieties of amorphous sulphur can be readily obtained. these are white sulphur and plastic sulphur. . _white sulphur._ flowers of sulphur, the preparation of which has been described, consists of a mixture of rhombic crystals and amorphous particles. when treated with carbon disulphide, the crystals dissolve, leaving the amorphous particles as a white residue. . _plastic sulphur._ when boiling sulphur is poured into cold water it assumes a gummy, doughlike form, which is quite elastic. this can be seen in a very striking manner by distilling sulphur from a small, short-necked retort, such as is represented in fig. , and allowing the liquid to run directly into water. in a few days it becomes quite brittle and passes over into ordinary rhombic sulphur. [illustration fig. ] ~chemical properties of sulphur.~ when sulphur is heated to its kindling temperature in oxygen or in the air it burns with a pale blue flame, forming sulphur dioxide (so_{ }). small quantities of sulphur trioxide (so_{ }) may also be formed in the combustion of sulphur. most metals when heated with sulphur combine directly with it, forming metallic sulphides. in some cases the action is so energetic that the mass becomes incandescent, as has been seen in the case of iron uniting with sulphur. this property recalls the action of oxygen upon metals, and in general the metals which combine readily with oxygen are apt to combine quite readily with sulphur. ~uses of sulphur.~ large quantities of sulphur are used as a germicide in vineyards, also in the manufacture of gunpowder, matches, vulcanized rubber, and sulphuric acid. compounds of sulphur with hydrogen ~hydrosulphuric acid~ (h_{ }s). this substance is a gas having the composition expressed by the formula h_{ }s and is commonly called hydrogen sulphide. it is found in the vapors issuing from volcanoes, and in solution in the so-called sulphur waters of many springs. it is formed when organic matter containing sulphur undergoes decay, just as ammonia is formed under similar circumstances from nitrogenous matter. ~preparation.~ hydrosulphuric acid is prepared in the laboratory by treating a sulphide with an acid. iron sulphide (fes) is usually employed: fes + hcl = fecl_{ } + h_{ }s. a convenient apparatus is shown in fig. . a few lumps of iron sulphide are placed in the bottle a, and dilute acid is added in small quantities at a time through the funnel tube b, the gas escaping through the tube c. [illustration: fig. ] ~explanation of the reaction.~ iron sulphide is a salt of hydrosulphuric acid, and this reaction is therefore similar to the one which takes place when sulphuric acid acts upon a nitrate. in both cases a salt and an acid are brought together, and there is a tendency for the reaction to go on until a state of equilibrium is reached. this equilibrium is constantly disturbed by the escape of the gaseous acid set free, so that the reaction goes on until all of the original salt has been decomposed. the two reactions differ in that the first one is complete at ordinary temperatures, while in the case of sulphuric acid acting upon sodium nitrate, the reacting substances must be heated so as to secure a temperature at which nitric acid is a gas. ~physical properties.~ hydrosulphuric acid is a colorless gas, having a weak, disagreeable taste and an exceedingly offensive odor. it is rather sparingly soluble in water at ordinary temperatures, about three volumes dissolving in one of water. in boiling water it is not soluble at all. in pure form it acts as a violent poison, and even when diluted largely with air produces headache, dizziness, and nausea. it is a little heavier than air, having a density of . . ~chemical properties.~ the most important chemical properties of hydrosulphuric acid are the following: . _acid properties._ hydrosulphuric acid is a weak acid. in solution in water it turns blue litmus red and neutralizes bases, forming salts called _sulphides_. . _action on oxygen._ the elements composing hydrosulphuric acid have each a strong affinity for oxygen, and are not held together very firmly. consequently the gas burns readily in oxygen or the air, according to the equation h_{ }s + o = h_{ }o + so_{ }. when there is not enough oxygen for both the sulphur and the hydrogen, the latter element combines with the oxygen and the sulphur is set free: h_{ }s + o = h_{ }o + s. . _reducing action._ owing to the ease with which hydrosulphuric acid decomposes and the strong affinity of both sulphur and hydrogen for oxygen, the substance is a strong reducing agent, taking oxygen away from many substances which contain it. . _action on metals._ hydrosulphuric acid acts towards metals in a way very similar to water. thus, when it is passed over heated iron in a tube, the reaction is represented by the equation fe + h_{ }s = fe_{ }s_{ } + h. water in the form of steam, under similar circumstances, acts according to the equation fe + h_{ }o = fe_{ }o_{ } + h. ~salts of hydrosulphuric acid,--sulphides.~ the salts of hydrosulphuric acid, called sulphides, form an important class of salts. many of them are found abundantly in nature, and some of them are important ores. they will be frequently mentioned in connection with the metals. most of the sulphides are insoluble in water, and some of them are insoluble in acids. consequently, when hydrosulphuric acid is passed into a solution of a salt, it often happens that a sulphide is precipitated. with copper chloride the equation is cucl_{ } + h_{ }s = cus + hcl. because of the fact that some metals are precipitated in this way as sulphides while others are not, hydrosulphuric acid is extensively used in the separation of the metals in the laboratory. ~explanation of the reaction.~ when hydrosulphuric acid and copper chloride are brought together in solution, both copper and sulphur ions are present, and these will come to an equilibrium, as represented in the equation cu^{+} + s^{-} <--> cus. since copper sulphide is almost insoluble in water, as soon as a very small quantity has formed the solution becomes supersaturated, and the excess keeps precipitating until nearly all the copper or sulphur ions have been removed from the solution. with some other ions, such as iron, the sulphide formed does not saturate the solution, and no precipitate results. oxides of sulphur sulphur forms two well-known compounds with oxygen: sulphur dioxide (so_{ }), sometimes called sulphurous anhydride; and sulphur trioxide (so_{ }), frequently called sulphuric anhydride. ~sulphur dioxide~ (so_{ }). sulphur dioxide occurs in nature in the gases issuing from volcanoes, and in solution in the water of many springs. it is likely to be found wherever sulphur compounds are undergoing oxidation. ~preparation.~ three general ways may be mentioned for the preparation of sulphur dioxide: . _by the combustion of sulphur._ sulphur dioxide is readily formed by the combustion of sulphur in oxygen or the air: s + o = so_{ }. it is also formed when substances containing sulphur are burned: zns + o = zno + so_{ }. . _by the reduction of sulphuric acid._ when concentrated sulphuric acid is heated with certain metals, such as copper, part of the acid is changed into copper sulphate, and part is reduced to sulphurous acid. the latter then decomposes into sulphur dioxide and water, the complete equation being cu + h_{ }so_{ } = cuso_{ } + so_{ } + h_{ }o. . _by the action of an acid on a sulphite._ sulphites are salts of sulphurous acid (h_{ }so_{ }). when a sulphite is treated with an acid, sulphurous acid is set free, and being very unstable, decomposes into water and sulphur dioxide. these reactions are expressed in the equations na_{ }so_{ } + hcl = nacl + h_{ }so_{ }, h_{ }so_{ } = h_{ }o + so_{ }. ~explanation of the reaction.~ in this case we have two reversible reactions depending on each other. in the first reaction, ( ) na_{ }so_{ } + hcl <--> nacl + h_{ }so_{ }, we should expect an equilibrium to result, for none of the four substances in the equation are insoluble or volatile when water is present to hold them in solution. but the quantity of the h_{ }so_{ } is constantly diminishing, owing to the fact that it decomposes, as represented in the equation ( ) h_{ }so_{ } <--> h_{ }o + so_{ }, and the sulphur dioxide, being a gas, escapes. no equilibrium can therefore result, since the quantity of the sulphurous acid is constantly being diminished because of the escape of sulphur dioxide. ~physical properties.~ sulphur dioxide is a colorless gas, which at ordinary temperatures is . times as heavy as air. it has a peculiar, irritating odor. the gas is very soluble in water, one volume of water dissolving eighty of the gas under standard conditions. it is easily condensed to a colorless liquid, and can be purchased in this condition stored in strong bottles, such as the one represented in fig. . [illustration: fig. ] ~chemical properties.~ sulphur dioxide has a marked tendency to combine with other substances, and is therefore an active substance chemically. it combines with oxygen gas, but not very easily. it can, however, take oxygen away from some other substances, and is therefore a good reducing agent. its most marked chemical property is its ability to combine with water to form sulphurous acid (h_{ }so_{ }). ~sulphurous acid~ (h_{ }so_{ }). when sulphur dioxide dissolves in water it combines chemically with it to form sulphurous acid, an unstable substance having the formula h_{ }so_{ }. it is impossible to prepare this acid in pure form, as it breaks down very easily into water and sulphur dioxide. the reaction is therefore reversible, and is expressed by the equation h_{ }o + so_{ } <--> h_{ }so_{ }. solutions of the acid in water have a number of interesting properties. . _acid properties._ the solution has all the properties typical of an acid. when neutralized by bases, sulphurous acid yields a series of salts called _sulphites_. . _reducing properties._ solutions of sulphurous acid act as good reducing agents. this is due to the fact that sulphurous acid has the power of taking up oxygen from the air, or from substances rich in oxygen, and is changed by this reaction into sulphuric acid: h_{ }so_{ } + o = h_{ }so_{ }, h_{ }so_{ } + h_{ }o_{ } = h_{ }s _{ } + h_{ }o. . _bleaching properties._ sulphurous acid has strong bleaching properties, acting upon many colored substances in such a way as to destroy their color. it is on this account used to bleach paper, straw goods, and even such foods as canned corn. . _antiseptic properties._ sulphurous acid has marked antiseptic properties, and on this account has the power of arresting fermentation. it is therefore used as a preservative. ~salts of sulphurous acid,--sulphites.~ the sulphites, like sulphurous acid, have the power of taking up oxygen very readily, and are good reducing agents. on account of this tendency, commercial sulphites are often contaminated with sulphates. a great deal of sodium sulphite is used in the bleaching industry, and as a reagent for softening paper pulp. ~sulphur trioxide~ (so_{ }). when sulphur dioxide and oxygen are heated together at a rather high temperature, a small amount of sulphur trioxide (so_{ }) is formed, but the reaction is slow and incomplete. if, however, the heating takes place in the presence of very fine platinum dust, the reaction is rapid and nearly complete. [illustration: fig. ] ~ experimental preparation of sulphur trioxide.~ the experiment can be performed by the use of the apparatus shown in fig. , the fine platinum being secured by moistening asbestos fiber with a solution of platinum chloride and igniting it in a flame. the fiber, covered with fine platinum, is placed in a tube of hard glass, which is then heated with a burner to about °, while sulphur dioxide and air are passed into the tube. union takes place at once, and the strongly fuming sulphur trioxide escapes from the jet at the end of the tube, and may be condensed by surrounding the receiving tube with a freezing mixture. ~properties of sulphur trioxide.~ sulphur trioxide is a colorless liquid, which solidifies at about ° and boils at °. a trace of moisture causes it to solidify into a mass of silky white crystals, somewhat resembling asbestos fiber in appearance. in contact with the air it fumes strongly, and when thrown upon water it dissolves with a hissing sound and the liberation of a great deal of heat. the product of this reaction is sulphuric acid, so that sulphur trioxide is the anhydride of that acid: so_{ } + h_{ }o = h_{ }so_{ }. ~catalysis.~ it has been found that many chemical reactions, such as the union of sulphur dioxide with oxygen, are much influenced by the presence of substances which do not themselves seem to take a part in the reaction, and are left apparently unchanged after it has ceased. these reactions go on very slowly under ordinary circumstances, but are greatly hastened by the presence of the foreign substance. substances which hasten very slow reactions in this way are said to act as catalytic agents or _catalyzers_, and the action is called _catalysis_. just how the action is brought about is not well understood. definition: _a catalyzer is a substance which changes the velocity of a reaction, but does not change its products._ ~examples of catalysis.~ we have already had several instances of such action. oxygen and hydrogen combine with each other at ordinary temperatures in the presence of platinum powder, while if no catalytic agent is present they do not combine in appreciable quantities until a rather high temperature is reached. potassium chlorate, when heated with manganese dioxide, gives up its oxygen at a much lower temperature than when heated alone. hydrogen dioxide decomposes very rapidly when powdered manganese dioxide is sifted into its concentrated solution. on the other hand, the catalytic agent sometimes retards chemical action. for example, a solution of hydrogen dioxide decomposes more slowly when it contains a little phosphoric acid than when perfectly pure. for this reason commercial hydrogen dioxide always contains phosphoric acid. many reactions are brought about by the catalytic action of traces of water. for example, phosphorus will not burn in oxygen in the absence of all moisture. hydrochloric acid will not unite with ammonia if the reagents are perfectly dry. it is probable that many of the chemical transformations in physiological processes, such as digestion, are assisted by certain substances acting as catalytic agents. the principle of catalysis is therefore very important. ~sulphuric acid~ (_oil of vitriol_) (h_{ }so_{ }). sulphuric acid is one of the most important of all manufactured chemicals. not only is it one of the most common reagents in the laboratory, but enormous quantities of it are used in many of the industries, especially in the refining of petroleum, the manufacture of nitroglycerin, sodium carbonate, and fertilizers. ~manufacture of sulphuric acid.~ . _contact process_. the reactions taking place in this process are represented by the following equations: so_{ } + o = so_{ }, so_{ } + h_{ }o = h_{ }so_{ }. to bring about the first of these reactions rapidly, a catalyzer is employed, and the process is carried out in the following way: large iron tubes are packed with some porous material, such as calcium and magnesium sulphates, which contains a suitable catalytic substance scattered through it. the catalyzers most used are platinum powder, vanadium oxide, and iron oxide. purified sulphur dioxide and air are passed through the tubes, which are kept at a temperature of about °. sulphur trioxide is formed, and as it issues from the tube it is absorbed in water or dilute sulphuric acid. the process is continued until all the water in the absorbing vessel has been changed into sulphuric acid, so that a very concentrated acid is made in this way. an excess of the trioxide may dissolve in the strong sulphuric acid, forming what is known as _fuming sulphuric acid_. . _chamber process._ the method of manufacture exclusively employed until recent years, and still in very extensive use, is much more complicated. the reactions are quite involved, but the conversion of water, sulphur dioxide, and oxygen into sulphuric acid is accomplished by the catalytic action of oxides of nitrogen. the reactions are brought about in large lead-lined chambers, into which oxides of nitrogen, sulphur dioxide, steam, and air are introduced in suitable proportions. ~reactions of the chamber process.~ in a very general way, the various reactions which take place in the lead chambers may be expressed in two equations. in the first reaction sulphur dioxide, nitrogen peroxide, steam, and oxygen unite, as shown in the equation ( ) so_{ } + no_{ } + h_{ }o + o = so_{ } (oh) (no_{ }). the product formed in this reaction is called nitrosulphuric acid or "chamber crystals." it actually separates on the walls of the chambers when the process is not working properly. under normal conditions, it is decomposed as fast as it is formed by the action of excess of steam, as shown in the equation ( ) so_{ } (oh) (no_{ }) + h_{ }o + o = h_{ }so_{ } + no_{ }. the nitrogen dioxide formed in this reaction can now enter into combination with a new quantity of sulphur dioxide, steam, and oxygen, and the series of reactions go on indefinitely. many other reactions occur, but these two illustrate the principle of the process. the relation between sulphuric acid and nitrosulphuric acid can be seen by comparing their structural formulas: o= -oh o= -oh s s o= -oh o= -no_{ } the latter may be regarded as derived from the former by the substitution of the nitro group (no_{ }) for the hydroxyl group (oh). [illustration: fig. ] ~the sulphuric acid plant.~ fig. illustrates the simpler parts of a plant used in the manufacture of sulphuric acid by the chamber process. sulphur or some sulphide, as fes_{ }, is burned in furnace a. the resulting sulphur dioxide, together with air and some nitrogen peroxide, are conducted into the large chambers, the capacity of each chamber being about , cu. ft. steam is also admitted into these chambers at different points. these compounds react to form sulphuric acid, according to the equations given above. the nitrogen left after the withdrawal of the oxygen from the admitted air escapes through the gay-lussac tower x. in order to prevent the escape of the oxides of nitrogen regenerated in the reaction, the tower is filled with lumps of coke, over which trickles concentrated sulphuric acid admitted from y. the nitrogen peroxide dissolves in the acid and the resulting solution collects in h. this is pumped into e, where it is mixed with dilute acid and allowed to trickle down through the chamber d (glover tower), which is filled with some acid-resisting rock. here the nitrogen peroxide is expelled from the solution by the action of the hot gases entering from a, and together with them enters the first chamber again. the acid from which the nitrogen peroxide is expelled collects in f. theoretically, a small amount of nitrogen peroxide would suffice to prepare an unlimited amount of sulphuric acid; practically, some of it escapes, and this is replaced by small amounts admitted at b. the sulphuric acid so formed, together with the excess of condensed steam, collect upon the floor of the chambers in the form of a liquid containing from % to % of sulphuric acid. the product is called _chamber acid_ and is quite impure; but for many purposes, such as the manufacture of fertilizers, it needs no further treatment. it can be concentrated by boiling it in vessels made of iron or platinum, which resist the action of the acid, nearly all the water boiling off. pure concentrated acid can be made best by the contact process, while the chamber process is cheaper for the dilute impure acid. ~physical properties.~ sulphuric acid is a colorless, oily liquid, nearly twice as heavy as water. the ordinary concentrated acid contains about % of water, has a density of . , and boils at °. it is sometimes called _oil of vitriol_, since it was formerly made by distilling a substance called _green vitriol_. ~chemical properties.~ sulphuric acid possesses chemical properties which make it one of the most important of chemical substances. . _action as an acid._ in dilute solution sulphuric acid acts as any other acid, forming salts with oxides and hydroxides. . _action as an oxidizing agent._ sulphuric acid contains a large percentage of oxygen and is, like nitric acid, a very good oxidizing agent. when the concentrated acid is heated with sulphur, carbon, and many other substances, oxidation takes place, the sulphuric acid decomposing according to the equation h_{ }so_{ } = h_{ }so_{ } + o. . _action on metals._ in dilute solution sulphuric acid acts upon many metals, such as zinc, forming a sulphate and liberating hydrogen. when the concentrated acid is employed the hydrogen set free is oxidized by a new portion of the acid, with the liberation of sulphur dioxide. with copper the reactions are expressed by the equations ( ) cu + h_{ }so_{ } = cuso_{ } + h, ( ) h_{ }so_{ } + h = h_{ }so_{ } + h_{ }o, ( ) h_{ }so_{ } = h_{ }o + so_{ }. by combining these equations the following one is obtained: cu + h_{ }so_{ } = cuso_{ } + so_{ } + h_{ }o. . _action on salts._ we have repeatedly seen that an acid of high boiling point heated with the salt of some acid of lower boiling point will drive out the low boiling acid. the boiling point of sulphuric acid ( °) is higher than that of almost any common acid; hence it is used largely in the preparation of other acids. . _action on water._ concentrated sulphuric acid has a very great affinity for water, and is therefore an effective dehydrating agent. gases which have no chemical action upon sulphuric acid can be freed from water vapor by bubbling them through the strong acid. when the acid is diluted with water much heat is set free, and care must be taken to keep the liquid thoroughly stirred during the mixing, and to pour the acid into the water,--never the reverse. not only can sulphuric acid absorb water, but it will often withdraw the elements hydrogen and oxygen from a compound containing them, decomposing the compound, and combining with the water so formed. for this reason most organic substances, such as sugar, wood, cotton, and woolen fiber, and even flesh, all of which contain much oxygen and hydrogen in addition to carbon, are charred or burned by the action of the concentrated acid. ~salts of sulphuric acid,--sulphates.~ the sulphates form a very important class of salts, and many of them have commercial uses. copperas (iron sulphate), blue vitriol (copper sulphate), and epsom salt (magnesium sulphate) serve as examples. many sulphates are important minerals, prominent among these being gypsum (calcium sulphate) and barytes (barium sulphate). ~thiosulphuric acid~ (h_{ }s_{ }o_{ }); ~thiosulphates.~ many other acids of sulphur containing oxygen are known, but none of them are of great importance. most of them cannot be prepared in a pure state, and are known only through their salts. the most important of these is thiosulphuric acid. when sodium sulphite is boiled with sulphur the two substances combine, forming a salt which has the composition represented in the formula na_{ }s_{ }o_{ }: na_{ }so_{ } + s = na_{ }s_{ }o_{ }. the substance is called sodium thiosulphate, and is a salt of the easily decomposed acid h_{ }s_{ }o_{ }, called thiosulphuric acid. this reaction is quite similar to the action of oxygen upon sulphites: na_{ }so_{ } + o = na_{ }so_{ }. more commonly the salt is called sodium hyposulphite, or merely "hypo." it is a white solid and is extensively used in photography, in the bleaching industry, and as a disinfectant. ~monobasic and dibasic acids.~ such acids as hydrochloric and nitric acids, which have only one replaceable hydrogen atom in the molecule, or in other words yield one hydrogen ion in solution, are called monobasic acids. acids yielding two hydrogen ions in solution are called dibasic acids. similarly, we may have tribasic and tetrabasic acids. the three acids of sulphur are dibasic acids. it is therefore possible for each of them to form both normal and acid salts. the acid salts can be made in two ways: the acid may be treated with only half enough base to neutralize it,-- naoh + h_{ }so_{ } = nahso_{ } + h_{ }o; or a normal salt may be treated with the free acid,-- na_{ }so_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } = nahso_{ }. acid sulphites and sulphides may be made in the same ways. ~carbon disulphide~ (cs_{ }). when sulphur vapor is passed over highly heated carbon the two elements combine, forming carbon disulphide (cs_{ }), just as oxygen and carbon unite to form carbon dioxide (co_{ }). the substance is a heavy, colorless liquid, possessing, when pure, a pleasant ethereal odor. on standing for some time, especially when exposed to sunlight, it undergoes a slight decomposition and acquires a most disagreeable, rancid odor. it has the property of dissolving many substances, such as gums, resins, and waxes, which are insoluble in most liquids, and it is extensively used as a solvent for such substances. it is also used as an insecticide. it boils at a low temperature ( °), and its vapor is very inflammable, burning in the air to form carbon dioxide and sulphur dioxide, according to the equation cs_{ } + o = co_{ } + so_{ }. [illustration: fig. ] ~commercial preparation of carbon disulphide.~ in the preparation of carbon disulphide an electrical furnace is employed, such as is represented in fig. . the furnace is packed with carbon c, and this is fed in through the hoppers b, as fast as that which is present in the hearth of the furnace is used up. sulphur is introduced at a, and at the lower ends of the tubes it is melted by the heat of the furnace and flows into the hearth as a liquid. an electrical current is passed through the carbon and melted sulphur from the electrodes e, heating the charge. the vapors of carbon disulphide pass up through the furnace and escape at d, from which they pass to a suitable condensing apparatus. ~comparison of sulphur and oxygen.~ a comparison of the formulas and the chemical properties of corresponding compounds of oxygen and sulphur brings to light many striking similarities. the conduct of hydrosulphuric acid and water toward many substances has been seen to be very similar; the oxides and sulphides of the metals have analogous formulas and undergo many parallel reactions. carbon dioxide and disulphide are prepared in similar ways and undergo many analogous reactions. it is clear, therefore, that these two elements are far more closely related to each other than to any of the other elements so far studied. ~selenium and tellurium.~ these two very uncommon elements are still more closely related to sulphur than is oxygen. they occur in comparatively small quantities and are usually found associated with sulphur and sulphides, either as the free elements or more commonly in combination with metals. they form compounds with hydrogen of the formulas h_{ }se and h_{ }te; these bodies are gases with properties very similar to those of h_{ }s. they also form oxides and oxygen acids which resemble the corresponding sulphur compounds. the elements even have allotropic forms corresponding very closely to those of sulphur. tellurium is sometimes found in combination with gold and copper, and occasions some difficulties in the refining of these metals. the elements have very few practical applications. ~crystallography.~ in order to understand the difference between the two kinds of sulphur crystals, it is necessary to know something about crystals in general and the forms which they may assume. an examination of a large number of crystals has shown that although they may differ much in geometric form, they can all be considered as modifications of a few simple plans. the best way to understand the relation of one crystal to another is to look upon every crystal as having its faces and angles arranged in definite fashion about certain imaginary lines drawn through the crystal. these lines are called axes, and bear much the same relation to a crystal as do the axis and parallels of latitude and longitude to the earth and a geographical study of it. all crystals can be referred to one of six simple plans or systems, which have their axes as shown in the following drawings. the names and characteristics of these systems are as follows: . isometric or regular system (fig. ). three equal axes, all at right angles. [illustration: fig. ] . tetragonal system (fig. ). two equal axes and one of different length, all at right angles to each other. [illustration: fig. ] . orthorhombic system (fig. ). three unequal axes, all at right angles to each other. [illustration: fig. ] . monoclinic system (fig. ). two axes at right angles, and a third at right angles to one of these, but inclined to the other. [illustration: fig. ] . triclinic system (fig. ). three axes, all inclined to each other. [illustration: fig. ] . hexagonal system (fig. ). three equal axes in the same plane intersecting at angles of °, and a fourth at right angles to all of these. [illustration: fig. ] every crystal can be imagined to have its faces and angles arranged in a definite way around one of these systems of axes. a cube, for instance, is referred to plan , an axis ending in the center of each face; while in a regular octohedron an axis ends in each solid angle. these forms are shown in fig. . it will be seen that both of these figures belong to the same system, though they are very different in appearance. in the same way, many geometric forms may be derived from each of the systems, and the light lines about the axes in the drawings show two of the simplest forms of each of the systems. in general a given substance always crystallizes in the same system, and two corresponding faces of each crystal of it always make the same angle with each other. a few substances, of which sulphur is an example, crystallize in two different systems, and the crystals differ in such physical properties as melting point and density. such substances are said to be _dimorphous_. exercises . (a) would the same amount of heat be generated by the combustion of g. of each of the allotropic modifications of sulphur? (b) would the same amount of sulphur dioxide be formed in each case? . is the equation for the preparation of hydrosulphuric acid a reversible one? as ordinarily carried out, does the reaction complete itself? . suppose that hydrosulphuric acid were a liquid, would it be necessary to modify the method of preparation? . can sulphuric acid be used to dry hydrosulphuric acid? give reason for answer. . does dry hydrosulphuric acid react with litmus paper? state reason for answer. . how many grams of iron sulphide are necessary to prepare l. of hydrosulphuric acid when the laboratory conditions are ° and mm. pressure? . suppose that the hydrogen in l. of hydrosulphuric acid were liberated; what volume would it occupy, the gases being measured under the same conditions? . write the equations representing the reaction between hydrosulphuric acid and sodium hydroxide and ammonium hydroxide respectively. . show that the preparation of sulphur dioxide from a sulphite is similar in principle to the preparation of hydrogen sulphide. . (a) does dry sulphur dioxide react with litmus paper? (b) how can it be shown that a solution of sulphur dioxide in water acts like an acid? . (a) calculate the percentage composition of sulphurous anhydride and sulphuric anhydride. (b) show how these two substances are in harmony with the law of multiple proportion. . how many pounds of sulphur would be necessary in the preparation of lb. of % sulphuric acid? . what weight of sulphur dioxide is necessary in the preparation of kg. of sodium sulphite? . what weight of copper sulphate crystals can be obtained by dissolving kg. of copper in sulphuric acid and crystallizing the product from water? . write the names and formulas of the oxides and oxygen acids of selenium and tellurium. . in the commercial preparation of carbon disulphide, what is the function of the electric current? . if the gay-lussac tower were omitted from the sulphuric acid factory, what effect would this have on the cost of production of sulphuric acid? chapter xv periodic law a number of the elements have now been studied somewhat closely. the first three of these, oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen, while having some physical properties in common with each other, have almost no point of similarity as regards their chemical conduct. on the other hand, oxygen and sulphur, while quite different physically, have much in common in their chemical properties. about eighty elements are now known. if all of these should have properties as diverse as do oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen, the study of chemistry would plainly be a very difficult and complicated one. if, however, the elements can be classified in groups, the members of which have very similar properties, the study will be very much simplified. ~earlier classification of the elements.~ even at an early period efforts were made to discover some natural principle in accordance with which the elements could be classified. two of these classifications may be mentioned here. . _classification into metals and non-metals._ the classification into metals and non-metals most naturally suggested itself. this grouping was based largely on physical properties, the metals being heavy, lustrous, malleable, ductile, and good conductors of heat and electricity. elements possessing these properties are usually base-forming in character, and the ability to form bases came to be regarded as a characteristic property of the metals. the non-metals possessed physical properties which were the reverse of those of the metals, and were acid-forming in character. not much was gained by this classification, and it was very imperfect. some metals, such as potassium, are very light; some non-metals, such as iodine, have a high luster; some elements can form either an acid or a base. . _classification into triad families._ in döbereiner observed that an interesting relation exists between the atomic weights of chemically similar elements. to illustrate, lithium, sodium, and potassium resemble each other very closely, and the atomic weight of sodium is almost exactly an arithmetical mean between those of the other two: ( . + . )/ = . . in many chemical and physical properties sodium is midway between the other two. a number of triad families were found, but among eighty elements, whose atomic weights range all the way from to , such agreements might be mere chance. moreover many elements did not appear to belong to such families. ~periodic division.~ in the russian chemist mendeléeff devised an arrangement of the elements based on their atomic weights, which has proved to be of great service in the comparative study of the elements. a few months later the german, lothar meyer, independently suggested the same ideas. this arrangement brought to light a great generalization, now known as the _periodic law_. an exact statement of the law will be given after the method of arranging the elements has been described. [illustration: dmitri ivanovitch mendelÉeff (russian) ( - ) author of the periodic law; made many investigations on the physical constants of elements and compounds; wrote an important book entitled "principles of chemistry"; university professor and government official] ~arrangement of the periodic table.~ the arrangement suggested by mendeléeff, modified somewhat by more recent investigations, is as follows: beginning with lithium, which has an atomic weight of , the elements are arranged in a horizontal row in the order of their atomic weights, thus: ~li ( . ), be ( . ), b ( ), c ( ), n ( . ), o ( ), f ( ).~ these seven elements all differ markedly from each other. the eighth element, sodium, is very similar to lithium. it is placed just under lithium, and a new row follows: ~na( . ), mg ( . ), al ( . ), si ( . ), p ( ), s ( . ), cl( . ).~ when the fifteenth element, potassium, is reached, it is placed under sodium, to which it is very similar, and serves to begin a third row: ~k ( . ), ca ( . ), sc ( . ,) ti ( . ), v ( . ), cr ( . ), mn( ).~ not only is there a strong similarity between lithium, sodium, and potassium, which have been placed in a vertical row because of this resemblance, but the elements in the other vertical rows exhibit much of the same kind of similarity among themselves, and evidently form little natural groups. the three elements following manganese, namely, iron, nickel, and cobalt, have atomic weights near together, and are very similar chemically. they do not strongly resemble any of the elements so far considered, and are accordingly placed in a group by themselves, following manganese. a new row is begun with copper, which somewhat resembles the elements of the first vertical column. following the fifth and seventh rows are groups of three closely related elements, so that the completed arrangement has the appearance represented in the table on page . the periodic arrangement of the elements --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ periods | group | group | group | group | group | | | i | ii | iii | iv | |a b|a b|a b|a b|a b| --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ |h== . | | | | | |he= |li= . |be= . |b= |c= | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ | ne= |na= . | mg= . | al= . | si= . | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ |a= . |k= . |ca= . |sc= . |ti= . | | | | | | | | | | | | | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ | | cu= . | zn= . | ga= | ge= . | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ |kr= . |rb= . |sr= . |y= |zr= . | | | | | | | | | | | | | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ | | ag= . | cd= . | in= | sn= | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ |x= |cs= . |ba= . |la= . |ce=yb* | | | | | | . - | | | | | | | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ | au= . | hg= | tl= . | pb= . | bi= . | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ | | |ra= | |th= . | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ | | r_{ }o | ro |r_{ }o_{ } | ro_{ } | | | rh | rh_{ } | rh_{ } | rh_{ } | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ ==================part ============== --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ periods | group | group | group | group | | v | vi | vii | viii | |a b|a b|a b| | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ | | | | | |n= . |o= |f= | | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ | p= | s= . | cl= . | | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ |v= . |cr= . |mn= |fe= . | | | | |ni= . | | | | |co= | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ | as= | se= . | br= . | | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ |cb= |mo= | |ru= . | | | | |rh= | | | | |pd= . | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ | sb= . | te= . | i= . | | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ |ta= |w= | |os= | | | | |ir= | | | | |pt= . | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ | | | | | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ | u= . | | | | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ | r_{ }o_{ }| ro_{ } | r_{ }o_{ }| ro_{ } | | rh_{ } | rh_{ } | rh | | --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ [* this includes a number of elements whose atomic weights lie between and , but which have not been accurately studied, and so their proper arrangement is uncertain.] ~place of the atmospheric elements.~ when argon was discovered it was seen at once that there was no place in the table for an element of atomic weight approximately . when the other inactive elements were found, however, it became apparent that they form a group just preceding group . they are accordingly arranged in this way in group (see table on opposite page). a study of this table brings to light certain very striking facts. ~properties of elements vary with atomic weights.~ there is evidently a close relation between the properties of an element and its atomic weight. lithium, at the beginning of the first group, is a very strong base-forming element, with pronounced metallic properties. beryllium, following lithium, is less strongly base-forming, while boron has some base-forming and some acid-forming properties. in carbon all base-forming properties have disappeared, and the acid-forming properties are more marked than in boron. these become still more emphasized as we pass through nitrogen and oxygen, until on reaching fluorine we have one of the strongest acid-forming elements. the properties of these seven elements therefore vary regularly with their atomic weights, or, in mathematical language, are regular functions of them. ~periodic law.~ the properties of the first seven elements vary _continuously_--that is steadily--away from base-forming and toward acid-forming properties. if lithium had the smallest atomic weight of any of the elements, and fluorine the greatest, so that in passing from one to the other we had included all the elements, we could say that the properties of elements are continuous functions of their atomic weights. but fluorine is an element of small atomic weight, and the one following it, sodium, breaks the regular order, for in it reappear all the characteristic properties of lithium. magnesium, following sodium, bears much the same relation to beryllium that sodium does to lithium, and the properties of the elements in the second row vary much as they do in the first row until potassium is reached, when another repetition begins. the properties of the elements do not vary continuously, therefore, with atomic weights, but at regular intervals there is a repetition, or _period_. this generalization is known as the _periodic law_, and may be stated thus: _the properties of elements are periodic functions of their atomic weights._ ~the two families in a group.~ while all the elements in a given vertical column bear a general resemblance to each other, it has been noticed that those belonging to periods having even numbers are very strikingly similar to each other. they are placed at the left side of the group columns. in like manner, the elements belonging to the odd periods are very similar and are arranged at the right side of the group columns. thus calcium, strontium, and barium are very much alike; so, too, are magnesium, zinc, and cadmium. the resemblance between calcium and magnesium, or strontium and zinc, is much less marked. this method of arrangement therefore divides each group into two families, each containing four or five members, between which there is a great similarity. ~family resemblances.~ let us now inquire more closely in what respects the elements of a family resemble each other. . _valence._ in general the valence of the elements in a family is the same, and the formulas of their compounds are therefore similar. if we know that the formula of sodium chloride is nacl, it is pretty certain that the formula of potassium chloride will be kcl--not kcl_{ } or kcl_{ }. the general formulas r_{ }o, ro, etc., placed below the columns show the formulas of the oxides of the elements in the column provided they form oxides. in like manner the formulas rh, rh_{ }, etc., show the composition of the compounds formed with hydrogen or chlorine. . _chemical properties._ the chemical properties of the members of a family are quite similar. if one member is a metal, the others usually are; if one is a non-metal, so, too, are the others. the families in the first two columns consist of metals, while the elements found in the last two columns form acids. there is in addition a certain regularity in properties of the elements in each family. if the element at the head of the family is a strong acid-forming element, this property is likely to diminish gradually, as we pass to the members of the family with higher atomic weights. thus phosphorus is strongly acid-forming, arsenic less so, antimony still less so, while bismuth has almost no acid-forming properties. we shall meet with many illustrations of this fact. . _physical properties._ in the same way, the physical properties of the members of a family are in general somewhat similar, and show a regular gradation as we pass from element to element in the family. thus the densities of the members of the magnesium family are mg = . , zn = . , cd = . , hg = . . their melting points are mg = °, zn = °, cd = °, hg = - . °. ~value of the periodic law.~ the periodic law has proved of much value in the development of the science of chemistry. . _it simplifies study._ it is at once evident that such regularities very much simplify the study of chemistry. a thorough study of one element of a family makes the study of the other members a much easier task, since so many of the properties and chemical reactions of the elements are similar. thus, having studied the element sulphur in some detail, it is not necessary to study selenium and tellurium so closely, for most of their properties can be predicted from the relation which they sustain to sulphur. . _it predicts new elements._ when the periodic law was first formulated there were a number of vacant places in the table which evidently belonged to elements at that time unknown. from their position in the table, mendeléeff predicted with great precision the properties of the elements which he felt sure would one day be discovered to fill these places. three of them, scandium, germanium, and gallium, were found within fifteen years, and their properties agreed in a remarkable way with the predictions of mendeléeff. there are still some vacant places in the table, especially among the heavier elements. . _it corrects errors._ the physical constants of many of the elements did not at first agree with those demanded by the periodic law, and a further study of many such cases showed that errors had been made. the law has therefore done much service in indicating probable error. ~imperfections of the law.~ there still remain a good many features which must be regarded as imperfections in the law. most conspicuous is the fact that the element hydrogen has no place in the table. in some of the groups elements appear in one of the families, while all of their properties show that they belong in the other. thus sodium belongs with lithium and not with copper; fluorine belongs with chlorine and not with manganese. there are two instances where the elements must be transposed in order to make them fit into their proper group. according to their atomic weights, tellurium should follow iodine, and argon should follow potassium. their properties show in each case that this order must be reversed. the table separates some elements altogether which, in many respects have closely agreeing properties. iron, chromium, and manganese are all in different groups, although they are similar in many respects. the system is therefore to be regarded as but a partial and imperfect expression of some very important and fundamental relation between the substances which we know as elements, the exact nature of this relation being as yet not completely clear to us. exercises . suppose that an element were discovered that filled the blank in group o, period ; what properties would it probably have? . suppose that an element were discovered that filled the blank in group vi, period , family b; what properties would it have? . sulphur and oxygen both belong in group vi, although in different families; in what respects are the two similar? chapter xvi the chlorine family ================================================================== | | | | | atomic | melting | boiling | color and state | weight | point | point | ______________|________|_________|_________|______________________ | | | | fluorine (f) | . | - ° | - ° | pale yellowish gas. chlorine (cl) | . | - ° | - . ° | greenish-yellow gas. bromine (br) | . | - ° | ° | red liquid. iodine (i) | . | ° | ° | purplish-black solid. ================================================================== ~the family.~ the four elements named in the above table form a strongly marked family of elements and illustrate very clearly the way in which the members of a family in a periodic group resemble each other, as well as the character of the differences which we may expect to find between the individual members. . _occurrence._ these elements do not occur in nature in the free state. the compounds of the last three elements of the family are found extensively in sea water, and on this account the name _halogens_, signifying "producers of sea salt," is sometimes applied to the family. . _properties._ as will be seen by reference to the table, the melting points and boiling points of the elements of the family increase with their atomic weights. a somewhat similar gradation is noted in their color and state. one atom of each of the elements combines with one atom of hydrogen to form acids, which are gases very soluble in water. the affinity of the elements for hydrogen is in the inverse order of their atomic weights, fluorine having the strongest affinity and iodine the weakest. only chlorine and iodine form oxides, and those of the former element are very unstable. the elements of the group are univalent in their compounds with hydrogen and the metals. fluorine ~occurrence.~ the element fluorine occurs in nature most abundantly as the mineral fluorspar (caf_{ }), as cryolite (na_{ }alf_{ }), and in the complex mineral apatite ( ca_{ }(po_{ })_{ }·caf_{ }). ~preparation.~ all attempts to isolate the element resulted in failure until recent years. methods similar to those which succeed in the preparation of the other elements of the family cannot be used; for as soon as the fluorine is liberated it combines with the materials of which the apparatus is made or with the hydrogen of the water which is always present. the preparation of fluorine was finally accomplished by the french chemist moissan by the electrolysis of hydrofluoric acid. perfectly dry hydrofluoric acid (hf) was condensed to a liquid and placed in a u-shaped tube made of platinum (or copper), which was furnished with electrodes and delivery tubes, as shown in fig. . this liquid is not an electrolyte, but becomes such when potassium fluoride is dissolved in it. when this solution was electrolyzed hydrogen was set free at the cathode and fluorine at the anode. [illustration: fig. ] ~properties.~ fluorine is a gas of slightly yellowish color, and can be condensed to a liquid boiling at - ° under atmospheric pressure. it solidifies at - °. it is extremely active chemically, being the most active of all the elements at ordinary temperatures. it combines with all the common elements save oxygen, very often with incandescence and the liberation of much heat. it has a strong affinity for hydrogen and is able to withdraw it from its compounds with other elements. because of its great activity it is extremely poisonous. fluorine does not form any oxides, neither does it form any oxygen acids, in which respects it differs from the other members of the family. ~hydrofluoric acid~ (hf). hydrofluoric acid is readily obtained from fluorspar by the action of concentrated sulphuric acid. the equation is caf_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } = caso_{ } + hf. in its physical properties it resembles the binary acids of the other elements of this family, being, however, more easily condensed to a liquid. the anhydrous acid boils at ° and can therefore be prepared at ordinary pressures. it is soluble in all proportions in water, and a concentrated solution--about %--is prepared for the market. its fumes are exceedingly irritating to the respiratory organs, and several chemists have lost their lives by accidentally breathing them. [illustration: henri moissan (french) ( - ) famous for his work with the electric furnace at high temperatures; prepared artificial diamonds, together with many new binary compounds such as carbides, silicides, borides, and nitrides; isolated fluorine and studied its properties and its compounds very thoroughly] ~chemical properties.~ hydrofluoric acid, like other strong acids, readily acts on bases and metallic oxides and forms the corresponding fluorides. it also dissolves certain metals such as silver and copper. it acts very vigorously upon organic matter, a single drop of the concentrated acid making a sore on the skin which is very painful and slow in healing. its most characteristic property is its action upon silicon dioxide (sio_{ }), with which it forms water and the gas silicon tetrafluoride (sif_{ }), as shown in the equation sio_{ } + hf = sif_{ } + h_{ }o. glass consists of certain compounds of silicon, which are likewise acted on by the acid so that it cannot be kept in glass bottles. it is preserved in flasks made of wax or gutta-percha. ~etching.~ advantage is taken of this reaction in etching designs upon glass. the glass vessel is painted over with a protective paint upon which the acid will not act, the parts which it is desired to make opaque being left unprotected. a mixture of fluorspar and sulphuric acid is then painted over the vessel and after a few minutes the vessel is washed clean. wherever the hydrofluoric acid comes in contact with the glass it acts upon it, destroying its luster and making it opaque, so that the exposed design will be etched upon the clear glass. frosted glass globes are often made in this way. the etching may also be effected by covering the glass with a thin layer of paraffin, cutting the design through the wax and then exposing the glass to the fumes of the acid. ~salts of hydrofluoric acid,--fluorides.~ a number of the fluorides are known, but only one of them, calcium fluoride (caf_{ }), is of importance. this is the well-known mineral fluorspar. chlorine ~historical.~ while studying the action of hydrochloric acid upon the mineral pyrolusite, in , scheele obtained a yellowish, gaseous substance to which he gave a name in keeping with the phlogiston theory then current. later it was supposed to be a compound containing oxygen. in , however, the english chemist sir humphry davy proved it to be an element and named it chlorine. ~occurrence.~ chlorine does not occur free in nature, but its compounds are widely distributed. for the most part it occurs in combination with the metals in the form of chlorides, those of sodium, potassium, and magnesium being most abundant. nearly all salt water contains these substances, particularly sodium chloride, and very large salt beds consisting of chlorides are found in many parts of the world. ~preparation.~ two general methods of preparing chlorine may be mentioned, namely, the laboratory method and the electrolytic method. . _laboratory method._ in the laboratory chlorine is made by warming the mineral pyrolusite (manganese dioxide, mno_{ }) with concentrated hydrochloric acid. the first reaction, which seems to be similar to the action of acids upon oxides in general, is expressed in the equation mno_{ } + hcl = mncl_{ } + h_{ }o. the manganese compound so formed is very unstable, however, and breaks clown according to the equation mncl_{ } = mncl_{ } + cl. instead of using hydrochloric acid in the preparation of chlorine it will serve just as well to use a mixture of sodium chloride and sulphuric acid, since these two react to form hydrochloric acid. the following equations will then express the changes: ( ) nacl + h_{ }so_{ } = na_{ }so_{ } + hcl. ( ) mno_{ } + hcl = mncl_{ } + cl + h_{ }o. ( ) mncl_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } = mnso_{ } + hcl. combining these equations, the following equation expressing the complete reaction is obtained: nacl + mno_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } = mnso_{ } + na_{ }so_{ } + h_{ }o + cl. since the hydrochloric acid liberated in the third equation is free to act upon manganese dioxide, it will be seen that all of the chlorine originally present in the sodium chloride is set free. the manganese dioxide and the hydrochloric acid are brought together in a flask, as represented in fig. , and a gentle heat is applied. the rate of evolution of the gas is regulated by the amount of heat applied, and the gas is collected by displacement of air. as the equations show, only half of the chlorine present in the hydrochloric acid is liberated. [illustration: fig. ] . _electrolytic method._ under the discussion of electrolysis (p. ) it was shown that when a solution of sodium chloride is electrolyzed chlorine is evolved at the anode, while the sodium set free at the cathode reacts with the water to form hydrogen, which is evolved, and sodium hydroxide, which remains in solution. a great deal of the chlorine required in the chemical industries is now made in this way in connection with the manufacture of sodium hydroxide. ~physical properties.~ chlorine is a greenish-yellow gas, which has a peculiar suffocating odor and produces a very violent effect upon the throat and lungs. even when inhaled in small quantities it often produces all the symptoms of a hard cold, and in larger quantities may have serious and even fatal action. it is quite heavy (density = . ) and can therefore be collected by displacement of air. one volume of water under ordinary conditions dissolves about three volumes of chlorine. the gas is readily liquefied, a pressure of six atmospheres serving to liquefy it at °. it forms a yellowish liquid which solidifies at - °. ~chemical properties.~ at ordinary temperatures chlorine is far more active chemically than any of the elements we have so far considered, with the exception of fluorine; indeed, it is one of the most active of all elements. . _action on metals._ a great many metals combine directly with chlorine, especially when hot. a strip of copper foil heated in a burner flame and then dropped into chlorine burns with incandescence. sodium burns brilliantly when heated strongly in slightly moist chlorine. gold and silver are quickly tarnished by the gas. . _action on non-metals._ chlorine has likewise a strong affinity for many of the non-metals. thus phosphorus burns in a current of the gas, while antimony and arsenic in the form of a fine powder at once burst into flame when dropped into jars of the gas. the products formed in all cases where chlorine combines with another element are called _chlorides_. . _action on hydrogen._ chlorine has a strong affinity for hydrogen, uniting with it to form hydrochloric acid. a jet of hydrogen burning in the air continues to burn when introduced into a jar of chlorine, giving a somewhat luminous flame. a mixture of the two gases explodes violently when a spark is passed through it or when it is exposed to bright sunlight. in the latter case it is the light and not the heat which starts the action. . _action on substances containing hydrogen._ not only will chlorine combine directly with free hydrogen but it will often abstract the element from its compounds. thus, when chlorine is passed into a solution containing hydrosulphuric acid, sulphur is precipitated and hydrochloric acid formed. the reaction is shown by the following equation: h_{ }s + cl = hcl + s. with ammonia the action is similar: nh_{ } + cl = hcl + n. the same tendency is very strikingly seen in the action of chlorine upon turpentine. the latter substance is largely made up of compounds having the composition represented by the formula c_{ }h_{ }. when a strip of paper moistened with warm turpentine is placed in a jar of chlorine dense fumes of hydrochloric acid appear and a black deposit of carbon is formed. even water, which is a very stable compound, can be decomposed by chlorine, the oxygen being liberated. this may be shown in the following way: [illustration: fig. ] if a long tube of rather large diameter is filled with a strong solution of chlorine in water and inverted in a vessel of the same solution, as shown in fig. , and the apparatus is placed in bright sunlight, very soon bubbles of a gas will be observed to rise through the solution and collect in the tube. an examination of this gas will show that it is oxygen. it is liberated from water in accordance with the following equation: h_{ }o + cl = hcl + o. . _action on color substances,--bleaching action._ if strips of brightly colored cloth or some highly colored flowers are placed in quite dry chlorine, no marked change in color is noticed as a rule. if, however, the cloth and flowers are first moistened, the color rapidly disappears, that is, the objects are bleached. evidently the moisture as well as the chlorine is concerned in the action, and a study of the case shows that the chlorine has combined with the hydrogen of the water. the oxygen set free oxidizes the color substance, converting it into a colorless compound. it is evident from this explanation that chlorine will only bleach those substances which are changed into colorless compounds by oxidation. . _action as a disinfectant._ chlorine has also marked germicidal properties, and the free element, as well as compounds from which it is easily liberated, are used as disinfectants. ~nascent state.~ it will be noticed that oxygen when set free from water by chlorine is able to do what ordinary oxygen cannot do, for both the cloth and the flowers are unchanged in the air which contains oxygen. it is generally true that the activity of an element is greatest at the instant of liberation from its compounds. to express this fact elements at the instant of liberation are said to be in the _nascent state_. it is nascent oxygen which does the bleaching. ~hydrochloric acid~ (_muriatic acid_) (hcl). the preparation of hydrochloric acid may be discussed under two general heads: . _laboratory preparation._ the product formed by the burning of hydrogen in chlorine is the gas hydrochloric acid. this substance is much more easily obtained, however, by treating common salt (sodium chloride) with sulphuric acid. the following equation shows the reaction: nacl + h_{ }so_{ } = na_{ }so_{ } + hcl. the dry salt is placed in a flask furnished with a funnel tube and an exit tube, the sulphuric acid is added, and the flask gently warmed. the hydrochloric acid gas is rapidly given off and can be collected by displacement of air. the same apparatus can be used as was employed in the preparation of chlorine (fig. ). when a _solution_ of salt is treated with sulphuric acid there is no very marked action. the hydrochloric acid formed is very soluble in water, and so does not escape from the solution; hence a state of equilibrium is soon reached between the four substances represented in the equation. when _concentrated_ sulphuric acid, in which hydrochloric acid is not soluble, is poured upon dry salt the reaction is complete. . _commercial preparation._ commercially, hydrochloric acid is prepared in connection with the manufacture of sodium sulphate, the reaction being the same as that just given. the reaction is carried out in a furnace, and the hydrochloric acid as it escapes in the form of gas is passed into water in which it dissolves, the solution forming the hydrochloric acid of commerce. when the materials are pure a colorless solution is obtained. the most concentrated solution has a density of . and contains % hcl. the commercial acid, often called _muriatic acid_, is usually colored yellow by impurities. ~composition of hydrochloric acid.~ when a solution of hydrochloric acid is electrolyzed in an apparatus similar to the one in which water was electrolyzed (fig. ), chlorine collects at the anode and hydrogen at the cathode. at first the chlorine dissolves in the water, but soon the water in the one tube becomes saturated with it, and if the stopcocks are left open until this is the case, and are then closed, it will be seen that the two gases are set free in equal volumes. when measured volumes of the two gases are caused to unite it is found that one volume of hydrogen combines with one of chlorine. other experiments show that the volume of hydrochloric acid formed is just equal to the sum of the volumes of hydrogen and chlorine. therefore one volume of hydrogen combines with one volume of chlorine to form two volumes of hydrochloric acid gas. since chlorine is . times as heavy as hydrogen, it follows that one part of hydrogen by weight combines with . parts of chlorine to form . parts of hydrochloric acid. ~physical properties.~ hydrochloric acid is a colorless gas which has an irritating effect when inhaled, and possesses a sour, biting taste, but no marked odor. it is heavier than air (density = . ) and is very soluble in water. under standard conditions volume of water dissolves about volumes of the gas. on warming such a solution the gas escapes, until at the boiling point the solution contains about % by weight of hcl. further boiling will not drive out any more acid, but the solution will distill with unchanged concentration. a more dilute solution than this will lose water on boiling until it has reached the same concentration, %, and will then distill unchanged. under high pressure the gas can be liquefied, atmospheres being required at °. under these conditions it forms a colorless liquid which is not very active chemically. it boils at - ° and solidifies at - °. the solution of the gas in water is used almost entirely in the place of the gas itself, since it is not only far more convenient but also more active. ~chemical properties.~ the most important chemical properties of hydrochloric acid are the following: . _action as an acid._ in aqueous solution hydrochloric acid has very strong acid properties; indeed, it is one of the strongest acids. it acts upon oxides and hydroxides, converting them into salts: naoh + hcl = nacl + h_{ }o, cuo + hcl = cucl_{ } + h_{ }o. it acts upon many metals, forming chlorides and liberating hydrogen: zn + hcl = zncl_{ } + h, al + hcl = alcl_{ } + h. unlike nitric and sulphuric acids it has no oxidizing action, so that when it acts on metals hydrogen is always given off. . _relation to combustion._ hydrochloric acid gas is not readily decomposed, and is therefore neither combustible nor a supporter of combustion. . _action on oxidizing agents._ although hydrochloric acid is incombustible, it can be oxidized under some circumstances, in which case the hydrogen combines with oxygen, while the chlorine is set free. thus, when a solution of hydrochloric acid acts upon manganese dioxide part of the chlorine is set free: mno_{ } + hcl = mncl_{ } + h_{ }o + cl. ~aqua regia.~ it has been seen that when nitric acid acts as an oxidizing agent it usually decomposes, as represented in the equation hno_{ } = h_{ }o + no + o. the oxygen so set free may act on hydrochloric acid: hcl + o = h_{ }o + cl. the complete equation therefore is hno_{ } + hcl = h_{ }o + no + cl. when concentrated nitric and hydrochloric acids are mixed this reaction goes on slowly, chlorine and some other substances not represented in the equation being formed. the mixture is known as _aqua regia_ and is commonly prepared by adding one volume of nitric acid to three volumes of hydrochloric acid. it acts more powerfully upon metals and other substances than either of the acids separately, and owes its strength not to acid properties but to the action of the nascent chlorine which it liberates. consequently, when it acts upon metals such as gold it converts them into chlorides, and the reaction can be represented by such equations as au + cl = aucl_{ }. ~salts of hydrochloric acid,--chlorides.~ the chlorides of all the metals are known and many of them are very important compounds. some of them are found in nature, and all can be prepared by the general method of preparing salts. silver chloride, lead chloride, and mercurous chloride are insoluble in water and acids, and can be prepared by adding hydrochloric acid to solutions of compounds of the respective elements. while the chlorides have formulas similar to the fluorides, their properties are often quite different. this is seen in the solubility of the salts. those metals whose chlorides are insoluble form soluble fluorides, while many of the metals which form soluble chlorides form insoluble fluorides. ~compounds of chlorine with oxygen and hydrogen.~ chlorine combines with oxygen and hydrogen to form four different acids. they are all quite unstable, and most of them cannot be prepared in pure form; their salts can easily be made, however, and some of them will be met with in the study of the metals. the formulas and names of these acids are as follows: hclo hypochlorous acid. hclo_{ } chlorous acid. hclo_{ } chloric acid. hclo_{ } perchloric acid. ~oxides of chlorine.~ two oxides are known, having the formulas cl_{ }o and clo_{ }. they decompose very easily and are good oxidizing agents. bromine ~historical.~ bromine was discovered in by the french chemist ballard, who isolated it from sea salt. he named it bromine (stench) because of its unbearable fumes. ~occurrence.~ bromine occurs almost entirely in the form of bromides, especially as sodium bromide and magnesium bromide, which are found in many salt springs and salt deposits. the stassfurt deposits in germany and the salt waters of ohio and michigan are especially rich in bromides. ~preparation of bromine.~ the laboratory method of preparing bromine is essentially different from the commercial method. [illustration fig. ] . _laboratory method._ as in the case of chlorine, bromine can be prepared by the action of hydrobromic acid (hbr) on manganese dioxide. since hydrobromic acid is not an article of commerce, a mixture of sulphuric acid and a bromide is commonly substituted for it. the materials are placed in a retort arranged as shown in fig. . the end of the retort just touches the surface of the water in the test tube. on heating, the bromine distills over and is collected in the cold receiver. the equation is nabr + h_{ }so_{ } + mno_{ } = na_{ }so_{ } + mnso_{ } + h_{ }o + br. . _commercial method._ bromine is prepared commercially from the waters of salt wells which are especially rich in bromides. on passing a current of electricity through such waters the bromine is first liberated. any chlorine liberated, however, will assist in the reaction, since free chlorine decomposes bromides, as shown in the equation nabr + cl = nacl + br. when the water containing the bromine is heated, the liberated bromine distills over into the receiver. ~physical properties.~ bromine is a dark red liquid about three times as heavy as water. its vapor has a very offensive odor and is most irritating to the eyes and throat. the liquid boils at ° and solidifies at - °; but even at ordinary temperatures it evaporates rapidly, forming a reddish-brown gas very similar to nitrogen peroxide in appearance. bromine is somewhat soluble in water, volumes of water under ordinary conditions dissolving volume of the liquid. it is readily soluble in carbon disulphide, forming a yellow solution. ~chemical properties and uses.~ in chemical action bromine is very similar to chlorine. it combines directly with many of the same elements with which chlorine unites, but with less energy. it combines with hydrogen and takes away the latter element from some of its compounds, but not so readily as does chlorine. its bleaching properties are also less marked. bromine finds many uses in the manufacture of organic drugs and dyestuffs and in the preparation of bromides. ~hydrobromic acid (hbr).~ when sulphuric acid acts upon a bromide hydrobromic acid is set free: nabr + h_{ }so_{ } = na_{ }so_{ } + hbr. at the same time some bromine is set free, as may be seen from the red fumes which appear, and from the odor. the explanation of this is found in the fact that hydrobromic acid is much less stable than hydrochloric acid, and is therefore more easily oxidized. concentrated sulphuric acid is a good oxidizing agent, and oxidizes a part of the hydrobromic acid, liberating bromine: h_{ }so_{ } + hbr = h_{ }o + so_{ } + br. ~preparation of pure hydrobromic acid.~ a convenient way to make pure hydrobromic acid is by the action of bromine upon moist red phosphorus. this can be done with the apparatus shown in fig. . bromine is put into the dropping funnel a, and red phosphorus, together with enough water to cover it, is placed in the flask b. by means of the stopcock the bromine is allowed to flow drop by drop into the flask, the reaction taking place without the application of heat. the equations are ( ) p + br = pbr_{ }, ( ) pbr_{ } + h_{ }o = p(oh)_{ } + hbr. [illustration fig. ] the u-tube c contains glass beads which have been moistened with water and rubbed in red phosphorus. any bromine escaping action in the flask acts upon the phosphorus in the u-tube. the hydrobromic acid is collected in the same way as hydrochloric acid. ~properties.~ hydrobromic acid very strikingly resembles hydrochloric acid in physical and chemical properties. it is a colorless, strongly fuming gas, heavier than hydrochloric acid and, like it, is very soluble in water. under standard conditions volume of water dissolves volumes of the gas. chemically, the chief point in which it differs from hydrochloric acid is in the fact that it is much more easily oxidized, so that bromine is more readily set free from it than chlorine is from hydrochloric acid. ~salts of hydrobromic acid,--bromides.~ the bromides are very similar to the chlorides in their properties. chlorine acts upon both bromides and free hydrobromic acid, liberating bromine from them: kbr + cl = kcl + br, hbr + cl = hcl + br. silver bromide is extensively used in photography, and the bromides of sodium and potassium are used as drugs. ~oxygen compounds.~ no oxides of bromine are surely known, and bromine does not form so many oxygen acids as chlorine does. salts of hypobromous acid (hbro) and bromic acid (hbro_{ }) are known. iodine ~historical.~ iodine was discovered in by courtois in the ashes of certain sea plants. its presence was revealed by its beautiful violet vapor, and this suggested the name iodine (from the greek for violet appearance). ~occurrence.~ in the combined state iodine occurs in very small quantities in sea water, from which it is absorbed by certain sea plants, so that it is found in their ashes. it occurs along with bromine in salt springs and beds, and is also found in chili saltpeter. ~preparation.~ iodine may be prepared in a number of ways, the principal methods being the following: . _laboratory method._ iodine can readily be prepared in the laboratory from an iodide by the method used in preparing bromine, except that sodium iodide is substituted for sodium bromide. it can also be made by passing chlorine into a solution of an iodide. [illustration: fig. ] . _commercial method._ commercially iodine was formerly prepared from seaweed (kelp), but is now obtained almost entirely from the deposits of chili saltpeter. the crude saltpeter is dissolved in water and the solution evaporated until the saltpeter crystallizes. the remaining liquors, known as the "mother liquors," contain sodium iodate (naio_{ }), in which form the iodine is present in the saltpeter. the chemical reaction by which the iodine is liberated from this compound is a complicated one, depending on the fact that sulphurous acid acts upon iodic acid, setting iodine free. this reaction is shown as follows: hio_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } = h_{ }so_{ } + h_{ }o + i. ~purification of iodine.~ iodine can be purified very conveniently in the following way. the crude iodine is placed in an evaporating dish e (fig. ), and the dish is set upon the sand bath s. the iodine is covered with the inverted funnel f, and the sand bath is gently heated with a bunsen burner. as the dish becomes warm the iodine rapidly evaporates and condenses again on the cold surface of the funnel in shining crystals. this process, in which a solid is converted into a vapor and is again condensed into a solid without passing through the liquid state, is called _sublimation_. ~physical properties.~ iodine is a purplish-black, shining, heavy solid which crystallizes in brilliant plates. even at ordinary temperatures it gives off a beautiful violet vapor, which increases in amount as heat is applied. it melts at ° and boils at °. it is slightly soluble in water, but readily dissolves in alcohol, forming a brown solution (tincture of iodine), and in carbon disulphide, forming a violet solution. the element has a strong, unpleasant odor, though by no means as irritating as that of chlorine and bromine. ~chemical properties.~ chemically iodine is quite similar to chlorine and bromine, but is still less active than bromine. it combines directly with many elements at ordinary temperatures. at elevated temperatures it combines with hydrogen, but the reaction is reversible and the compound formed is quite easily decomposed. both chlorine and bromine displace it from its salts: ki + br = kbr + i, ki + cl = kcl + i. when even minute traces of iodine are added to thin starch paste a very intense blue color develops, and this reaction forms a delicate test for iodine. iodine is extensively used in medicine, especially in the form of a tincture. it is also largely used in the preparation of dyes and organic drugs, iodoform, a substance used as an antiseptic, has the formula chi_{ }. ~hydriodic acid (hi).~ this acid cannot be prepared in pure condition by the action of sulphuric acid upon an iodide, since the hydriodic acid set free is oxidized by the sulphuric acid just as in the case of hydrobromic acid, but to a much greater extent. it can be prepared in exactly the same way as hydrobromic acid, iodine being substituted for bromine. it can also be prepared by passing hydrosulphuric acid into water in which iodine is suspended. the equation is h_{ }s + i = hi + s. the hydriodic acid formed in this way dissolves in the water. ~properties and uses.~ hydriodic acid resembles the corresponding acids of chlorine and bromine in physical properties, being a strongly fuming, colorless gas, readily soluble in water. under standard conditions volume of water dissolves about volumes of the gas. it is, however, more unstable than either hydrochloric or hydrobromic acids, and on exposure to the air it gradually decomposes in accordance with the equation hi + o = h_{ }o + i. owing to the slight affinity between iodine and hydrogen the acid easily gives up its hydrogen and is therefore a strong reducing agent. this is seen in its action on sulphuric acid. the salts of hydriodic acid, the iodides, are, in general, similar to the chlorides and bromides. potassium iodide (ki) is the most familiar of the iodides and is largely used in medicine. ~oxygen compounds.~ iodine has a much greater affinity for oxygen than has either chlorine or bromine. when heated with nitric acid it forms a stable oxide (i_{ }o_{ }). salts of iodic acid (hio_{ }) and periodic acid (hio_{ }) are easily prepared, and the free acids are much more stable than the corresponding acids of the other members of this family. gay-lussac's law of volumes in the discussion of the composition of hydrochloric acid it was stated that one volume of hydrogen combines with one volume of chlorine to form two volumes of hydrochloric acid. with bromine and iodine similar combining ratios hold good. these facts recall the simple volume relations already noted in the study of the composition of steam and ammonia. these relations may be represented graphically in the following way: +---+ +----+ +------+ +------+ | h | + | cl | = | h cl | + | h cl | +---+ +----+ +------+ +------+ +---+ +---+ +---+ +--------+ +--------+ | h | | h | + | o | = | h_{ }o | + | h_{ }o | +---+ +---+ +---+ +--------+ +--------+ +---+ +---+ +---+ +---+ +--------+ +--------+ | h | | h | | h | + | n | = | nh_{ } | + | nh_{ } | +---+ +---+ +---+ +---+ +--------+ +--------+ in the early part of the past century gay-lussac, a distinguished french chemist, studied the volume relations of many combining gases, and concluded that similar relations always hold. his observations are summed up in the following law: _when two gases combine chemically there is always a simple ratio between their volumes, and between the volume of either one of them and that of the product, provided it is a gas._ by a simple ratio is meant of course the ratio of small whole numbers, as : , : . exercises . how do we account for the fact that liquid hydrofluoric acid is not an electrolyte? . why does sulphuric acid liberate hydrofluoric acid from its salts? . in the preparation of chlorine, what advantages are there in treating manganese dioxide with a mixture of sodium chloride and sulphuric acid rather than with hydrochloric acid? . why must chlorine water be kept in the dark? . what is the derivation of the word nascent? . what substances studied are used as bleaching agents? to what is the bleaching action due in each case? . what substances studied are used as disinfecting agents? . what is meant by the statement that hydrochloric acid is one of the strongest acids? . what is the meaning of the phrase _aqua regia_? . cl_{ }o is the anhydride of what acid? . a solution of hydriodic acid on standing turns brown. how is this accounted for? . how can bromine vapor and nitrogen peroxide be distinguished from each other? . write the equations for the reaction taking place when hydriodic acid is prepared from iodine, phosphorus, and water. . from their behavior toward sulphuric acid, to what class of agents do hydrobromic and hydriodic acids belong? . give the derivation of the names of the elements of the chlorine family. . write the names and formulas for the binary acids of the group in the order of the stability of the acids. . what is formed when a metal dissolves in each of the following? nitric acid; dilute sulphuric acid; concentrated sulphuric acid; hydrochloric acid; aqua regia. . how could you distinguish between a chloride, a bromide, and an iodide? . what weight of sodium chloride is necessary to prepare sufficient hydrochloric acid to saturate l. of water under standard conditions? . on decomposition l. of hydrochloric acid would yield how many liters of hydrogen and chlorine respectively, the gases being measured under the same conditions? are your results in accord with the experimental facts? chapter xvii carbon and some of its simpler compounds ~the family.~ carbon stands at the head of a family of elements in the fourth group in the periodic table. the resemblances between the elements of this family, while quite marked, are not so striking as in the case of the elements of the chlorine family. with the exception of carbon, these elements are comparatively rare, and need not be taken up in detail in this chapter. titanium will be referred to again in connection with silicon which it very closely resembles. ~occurrence.~ carbon is found in nature in the uncombined state in several forms. the diamond is practically pure carbon, while graphite and coal are largely carbon, but contain small amounts of other substances. its natural compounds are exceedingly numerous and occur as gases, liquids, and solids. carbon dioxide is its most familiar gaseous compound. natural gas and petroleum are largely compounds of carbon with hydrogen. the carbonates, especially calcium carbonate, constitute great strata of rocks, and are found in almost every locality. all living organisms, both plant and animal, contain a large percentage of this element, and the number of its compounds which go to make up all the vast variety of animate nature is almost limitless. over one hundred thousand definite compounds containing carbon have been prepared. in the free state carbon occurs in three allotropic forms, two of which are crystalline and one amorphous. ~crystalline carbon.~ crystalline carbon occurs in two forms,--diamond and graphite. . _diamond._ diamonds are found in considerable quantities in several localities, especially in south africa, the east indies, and brazil. the crystals belong to the regular system, but the natural stones do not show this very clearly. when found they are usually covered with a rough coating which is removed in the process of cutting. diamond cutting is carried on most extensively in holland. the density of the diamond is . , and, though brittle, it is one of the hardest of substances. black diamonds, as well as broken and imperfect stones which are valueless as gems, are used for grinding hard substances. few chemical reagents have any action on the diamond, but when heated in oxygen or the air it blackens and burns, forming carbon dioxide. lavoisier first showed that carbon dioxide is formed by the combustion of the diamond; and sir humphry davy in showed that this is the only product of combustion, and that the diamond is pure carbon. ~the diamond as a gem.~ the pure diamond is perfectly transparent and colorless, but many are tinted a variety of colors by traces of foreign substances. usually the colorless ones are the most highly prized, although in some instances the color adds to the value; thus the famous hope diamond is a beautiful blue. light passing through a diamond is very much refracted, and to this fact the stone owes its brilliancy and sparkle. ~artificial preparation of diamonds.~ many attempts have been made to produce diamonds artificially, but for a long time these always ended in failure, graphite and not diamonds being the product obtained. the french chemist moissan, in his extended study of chemistry at high temperatures, finally succeeded ( ) in making some small ones. he accomplished this by dissolving carbon in boiling iron and plunging the crucible containing the mixture into water, as shown in fig. . under these conditions the carbon crystallized in the iron in the form of the diamond. the diamonds were then obtained by dissolving away the iron in hydrochloric acid. [illustration: fig. ] . _graphite._ this form of carbon is found in large quantities, especially in ceylon, siberia, and in some localities of the united states and canada. it is a shining black substance, very soft and greasy to the touch. its density is about . . it varies somewhat in properties according to the locality in which it is found, and is more easily attacked by reagents than is the diamond. it is also manufactured by heating carbon with a small amount of iron ( %) in an electric furnace. it is used in the manufacture of lead pencils and crucibles, as a lubricant, and as a protective covering for iron in the form of a polish or a paint. ~amorphous carbon.~ although there are many varieties of amorphous carbon known, they are not true allotropic modifications. they differ merely in their degree of purity, their fineness of division, and in their mode of preparation. these substances are of the greatest importance, owing to their many uses in the arts and industries. as they occur in nature, or are made artificially, they are nearly all impure carbon, the impurity depending on the particular substance in question. . _pure carbon._ pure amorphous carbon is best prepared by charring sugar. this is a substance consisting of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, the latter two elements being present in the ratio of one oxygen atom to two of hydrogen. when sugar is strongly heated the oxygen and hydrogen are driven off in the form of water and pure carbon is left behind. prepared in this way it is a soft, lustrous, very bulky, black powder. . _coal and coke._ coals of various kinds were probably formed from vast accumulations of vegetable matter in former ages, which became covered over with earthy material and were thus protected from rapid decay. under various natural agencies the organic matter was slowly changed into coal. in anthracite these changes have gone the farthest, and this variety of coal is nearly pure carbon. soft or bituminous coals contain considerable organic matter besides carbon and mineral substances. when heated strongly out of contact with air the organic matter is decomposed and the resulting volatile matter is driven off in the form of gases and vapors, and only the mineral matter and carbon remain behind. the gaseous product is chiefly illuminating gas and the solid residue is _coke_. some of the coke is found as a dense cake on the sides and roof of the retort. this is called retort carbon and is quite pure. . _charcoal._ this is prepared from wood in the same way that coke is made from coal. when the process is carried on in retorts the products expelled by the heat are saved. among these are many valuable substances such as wood alcohol and acetic acid. where timber is abundant the process is carried out in a wasteful way, by merely covering piles of wood with sod and setting the wood on fire. some wood burns and the heat from this decomposes the wood not burned, forming charcoal from it. the charcoal, of course, contains the mineral part of the wood from which it is formed. . _bone black._ this is sometimes called animal charcoal, and is made by charring bones and animal refuse. the organic part of the materials is thus decomposed and carbon is left in a very finely divided state, scattered through the mineral part which consists largely of calcium phosphate. for some uses this mineral part is removed by treatment with hydrochloric acid and prolonged washing. . _lampblack._ lampblack and soot are products of imperfect combustion of oil and coal, and are deposited from a smoky flame on a cold surface. the carbon in this form is very finely divided and usually contains various oily materials. ~properties.~ while the various forms of carbon differ in many properties, especially in color and hardness, yet they are all odorless, tasteless solids, insoluble in water and characterized by their stability towards heat. only in the intense heat of the electric arc does carbon volatilize, passing directly from the solid state into a vapor. owing to this fact the inside surface of an incandescent light bulb after being used for some time becomes coated with a dark film of carbon. it is not acted on at ordinary temperatures by most reagents, but at a higher temperature it combines directly with many of the elements, forming compounds called _carbides_. when heated in the presence of sufficient oxygen it burns, forming carbon dioxide. ~uses of carbon.~ the chief use of amorphous carbon is for fuel to furnish heat and power for all the uses of civilization. an enormous quantity of carbon in the form of the purer coals, coke, and charcoal is used as a reducing agent in the manufacture of the various metals, especially in the metallurgy of iron. most of the metals are found in nature as oxides, or in forms which can readily be converted into oxides. when these oxides are heated with carbon the oxygen is abstracted, leaving the metal. retort carbon and coke are used to make electric light carbons and battery plates, while lampblack is used for indelible inks, printer's ink, and black varnishes. bone black and charcoal have the property of absorbing large volumes of certain gases, as well as smaller amounts of organic matter; hence they are used in filters to remove noxious gases and objectionable colors and odors from water. bone black is used extensively in the sugar refineries to remove coloring matter from the impure sugars. ~chemistry of carbon compounds.~ carbon is remarkable for the very large number of compounds which it forms with the other elements, especially with oxygen and hydrogen. compounds containing carbon are more numerous than all others put together, and the chemistry of these substances presents peculiarities not met with in the study of other substances. for these reasons the systematic study of carbon compounds, or of _organic chemistry_ as it is usually called, must be deferred until the student has gained some knowledge of the chemistry of other elements. an acquaintance with a few of the most familiar carbon compounds is, however, essential for the understanding of the general principles of chemistry. ~compounds of carbon with hydrogen,--the hydrocarbons.~ carbon unites with hydrogen to form a very large number of compounds called _hydrocarbons_. petroleum and natural gas are essentially mixtures of a great variety of these hydrocarbons. many others are found in living plants, and still others are produced by the decay of organic matter in the absence of air. only two of them, methane and acetylene, will be discussed here. ~methane~ (_marsh gas_) (ch_{ }). this is one of the most important of these hydrocarbons, and constitutes about nine tenths of natural gas. as its name suggests, it is formed in marshes by the decay of vegetable matter under water, and bubbles of the gas are often seen to rise when the dead leaves on the bottom of pools are stirred. it also collects in mines, and, when mixed with air, is called _fire damp_ by the miners because of its great inflammability, damp being an old name for a gas. it is formed when organic matter, such as coal or wood, is heated in closed vessels, and is therefore a principal constituent of coal gas. ~preparation.~ methane is prepared in the laboratory by heating sodium or calcium acetate with soda-lime. equal weights of fused sodium acetate and soda-lime are thoroughly dried, then mixed and placed in a good-sized, hard-glass test tube fitted with a one-holed stopper and delivery tube. the mixture is gradually heated, and when the air has been displaced from the tube the gas is collected in bottles by displacement of water. soda-lime is a mixture of sodium and calcium hydroxides. regarding it as sodium hydroxide alone, the equation is nac_{ }h_{ }o_{ } + naoh = na_{ }co_{ } + ch_{ }. ~properties.~ methane is a colorless, odorless gas whose density is . . it is difficult to liquefy, boiling at - ° under standard pressure, and is almost insoluble in water. it burns with a pale blue flame, liberating much heat, and when mixed with oxygen is very explosive. ~davy's safety lamp.~ in sir humphry davy invented a lamp for the use of miners, to prevent the dreadful mine explosions then common, due to methane mixed with air. the invention consisted in surrounding the upper part of the common miner's lamp with a mantle of wire gauze and the lower part with glass (fig. ). it has been seen that two gases will not combine until raised to their kindling temperature, and if while combining they are cooled below this point, the combination ceases. a flame will not pass through a wire gauze because the metal, being a good conductor of heat, takes away so much heat from the flame that the gases are cooled below the kindling temperature. when a lamp so protected is brought into an explosive mixture the gases inside the wire mantle burn in a series of little explosions, giving warning to the miner that the air is unsafe. [illustration: fig. ] ~acetylene~ (c_{ }h_{ }). this is a colorless gas usually having a disagreeable odor due to impurities. it is now made in large quantities from calcium carbide (cac_{ }). this substance is formed when coal and lime are heated together in an electric furnace. when treated with water the carbide is decomposed, yielding acetylene: cac_{ } + h_{ }o = c_{ }h_{ } + ca(oh)_{ }. under ordinary conditions the gas burns with a very smoky flame; in burners constructed so as to secure a large amount of oxygen it burns with a very brilliant white light, and hence is used as an illuminant. ~laboratory preparation.~ the gas can be prepared readily in a generator such as is shown in fig. . the inner tube contains fragments of calcium carbide, while the outer one is filled with water. as long as the stopcock is closed the water cannot rise in the inner tube. when the stopcock is open the water rises, and, coming into contact with the carbide in the inner tube, generates acetylene. this escapes through the stopcock, and after the air has been expelled may be lighted as it issues from the burner. [illustration: fig. ] carbon forms two oxides, namely, carbon dioxide (co_{ }) and carbon monoxide (co). ~carbon dioxide~ (co_{ }). carbon dioxide is present in the air to the extent of about parts in , , and this apparently small amount is of fundamental importance in nature. in some localities it escapes from the earth in great quantities, and many spring waters carry large amounts of it in solution. when these highly charged spring waters reach the surface of the earth, and the pressure on them is removed, the carbon dioxide escapes with effervescence. it is a product of the oxidation of all organic matter, and is therefore formed in fires as well as in the process of decay. it is thrown off from the lungs of all animals in respiration, and is a product of many fermentation processes such as vinegar making and brewing. combined with metallic oxides it forms vast deposits of carbonates in nature. ~preparation.~ in the laboratory carbon dioxide is always prepared by the action of an acid upon a carbonate, usually calcium carbonate, the apparatus shown in fig. serving the purpose very well. this reaction might be expected to produce carbonic acid, thus: caco_{ } + hcl = cacl_{ } + h_{ }co_{ }. carbonic acid is very unstable, however, and decomposes into its anhydride, co_{ }, and water, thus: h_{ }co_{ } = h_{ }o + co_{ }. the complete reaction is represented by the equation caco_{ } + hcl = cacl_{ } + co_{ } + h_{ }o. ~physical properties.~ carbon dioxide is a colorless, practically odorless gas whose density is . . its weight may be inferred from the fact that it can be siphoned, or poured like water, from one vessel downward into another. at ° and under ordinary pressure it dissolves in its own volume of water and imparts a somewhat biting, pungent taste to it. it is easily condensed, and is now prepared commercially in this form by pumping the gas into steel cylinders (see fig. ) which are kept cold during the process. when the liquid is permitted to escape into the air part of it instantly evaporates, and in so doing absorbs so much heat that another portion is solidified, the solid form strikingly resembling snow in appearance. this snow is very cold and mercury can easily be frozen with it. ~solid carbon dioxide.~ cylinders of liquid carbon dioxide are inexpensive, and should be available in every school. to demonstrate the properties of solid carbon dioxide, the cylinder should be placed across the table and supported in such a way that the stopcock end is several inches lower than the other end. a loose bag is made by holding the corners of a handkerchief around the neck of the stopcock, and the cock is then turned on so that the gas rushes out in large quantities. very quickly a considerable quantity of the snow collects in the handkerchief. to freeze mercury, press a piece of filter paper into a small evaporating dish and pour the mercury upon it. coil a flat spiral upon the end of a wire, and dip the spiral into the mercury. place a quantity of solid carbon dioxide upon the mercury and pour cc.- cc. of ether over it. in a minute or two the mercury will solidify and may be removed from the dish by the wire serving as a handle. the filter paper is to prevent the mercury from sticking to the dish; the ether dissolves the solid carbon dioxide and promotes its rapid conversion into gas. ~chemical properties.~ carbon dioxide is incombustible, since it is, like water, a product of combustion. it does not support combustion, as does nitrogen peroxide, because the oxygen in it is held in very firm chemical union with the carbon. very strong reducing agents, such as highly heated carbon, can take away half of its oxygen: co_{ } + c = co. ~uses.~ the relation of carbon dioxide to plant life has been discussed in a previous chapter. water highly charged with carbon dioxide is used for making soda water and similar beverages. since it is a non-supporter of combustion and can be generated readily, carbon dioxide is also used as a fire extinguisher. some of the portable fire extinguishers are simply devices for generating large amounts of the gas. it is not necessary that all the oxygen should be kept away from the fire in order to smother it. a burning candle is extinguished in air which contains only . % of carbon dioxide. ~carbonic acid~ (h_{ }co_{ }). like most of the oxides of the non-metallic elements, carbon dioxide is an acid anhydride. it combines with water to form an acid of the formula h_{ }co_{ }, called carbonic acid: h_{ }o + co_{ } = h_{ }co_{ }. the acid is, however, very unstable and cannot be isolated. only a very small amount of it is actually formed when carbon dioxide is passed into water, as is evident from the small solubility of the gas. if, however, a base is present in the water, salts of carbonic acid are formed, and these are quite stable: naoh + h_{ }o + co_{ } = na_{ }co_{ } + h_{ }o. ~action of carbon dioxide on bases.~ this conduct is explained by the principles of reversible reactions. the equation h_{ }o +co_{ } <--> h_{ }co_{ } is a reversible equation, and the extent to which the reaction progresses depends upon the relative concentrations of each of the three factors in it. equilibrium is ordinarily reached when very little h_{ }co_{ } is formed. if a base is present in the water to combine with the h_{ }co_{ } as fast as it is formed, all of the co_{ } is converted into h_{ }co_{ }, and thence into a carbonate. ~salts of carbonic acid,--carbonates.~ the carbonates form a very important class of salts. they are found in large quantities in nature, and are often used in chemical processes. only the carbonates of sodium, potassium, and ammonium are soluble, and these can be made by the action of carbon dioxide on solutions of the bases, as has just been explained. the insoluble carbonates are formed as precipitates when soluble salts are treated with a solution of a soluble carbonate. thus the insoluble calcium carbonate can be made by bringing together solutions of calcium chloride and sodium carbonate: cacl_{ } + na_{ }co_{ } = caco_{ } + nacl. most of the carbonates are decomposed by heat, yielding an oxide of the metal and carbon dioxide. thus lime (calcium oxide) is made by strongly heating calcium carbonate: caco_{ } = cao + co_{ }. ~acid carbonates.~ like all acids containing two acid hydrogen atoms, carbonic acid can form both normal and acid salts. the acid carbonates are made by treating a normal carbonate with an excess of carbonic acid. with few exceptions they are very unstable, heat decomposing them even when in solution. ~action of carbon dioxide on calcium hydroxide.~ if carbon dioxide is passed into clear lime water, calcium carbonate is at first precipitated: h_{ }o + co_{ } = h_{ }co_{ }, ca(oh)_{ } + h_{ }co_{ } = caco_{ } + h_{ }o. advantage is taken of this reaction in testing for the presence of carbon dioxide, as already explained in the chapter on the atmosphere. if the current of carbon dioxide is continued, the precipitate soon dissolves, because the excess of carbonic acid forms calcium acid carbonate which is soluble: caco_{ } + h_{ }co_{ } = ca(hco_{ })_{ }. if now the solution is heated, the acid carbonate is decomposed and calcium carbonate once more precipitated: ca(hco_{ })_{ } = caco_{ } + h_{ }co_{ }. ~carbon monoxide (co).~ carbon monoxide can be made in a number of ways, the most important of which are the three following: . _by the partial oxidation of carbon._ if a slow current of air is conducted over highly heated carbon, the monoxide is formed, thus: c + o = co it is therefore often formed in stoves when the air draught is insufficient. water gas, which contains large amounts of carbon monoxide, is made by partially oxidizing carbon with steam: c + h_{ }o = co + h. . _by the partial reduction of carbon dioxide._ when carbon dioxide is conducted over highly heated carbon it is reduced to carbon monoxide by the excess of carbon: co_{ } + c = co. when coal is burning in a stove or grate carbon dioxide is at first formed in the free supply of air, but as the hot gas rises through the glowing coal it is reduced to carbon monoxide. when the carbon monoxide reaches the free air above the coal it takes up oxygen to form carbon dioxide, burning with the blue flame so familiar above a bed of coals, especially in the case of hard coals. . _by the decomposition of oxalic acid._ in the laboratory carbon monoxide is usually prepared by the action of concentrated sulphuric acid upon oxalic acid. the latter substance has the formula c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }. the sulphuric acid, owing to its affinity for water, decomposes the oxalic acid, as represented in the equation c_{ }h_{ }o_{ } + (h_{ }so_{ }) = (h_{ }so_{ }) + h_{ }o + co_{ } + co. ~properties.~ carbon monoxide is a light, colorless, almost odorless gas, very difficult to liquefy. chemically it is very active, combining directly with a great many substances. it has a great affinity for oxygen and is therefore combustible and a good reducing agent. thus, if carbon monoxide is passed over hot copper oxide, the copper is reduced to the metallic state: cuo + co = cu + co_{ }. when inhaled it combines with the red coloring matter of the blood and in this way prevents the absorption of oxygen, so that even a small quantity of the gas may prove fatal. [illustration: fig. ] ~the reducing power of carbon monoxide.~ fig. illustrates a method of showing the reducing power of carbon monoxide. the gas is generated by gently heating or g. of oxalic acid with cc. of concentrated sulphuric acid in a cc. flask a. the bottle b contains a solution of sodium hydroxide, which removes the carbon dioxide formed along with the monoxide. c contains a solution of calcium hydroxide to show that the carbon dioxide is completely removed. e is a hard-glass tube containing or g. of copper oxide, which is heated by a burner. the black copper oxide is reduced to reddish metallic copper by the carbon monoxide, which is thereby changed to carbon dioxide. the presence of the carbon dioxide is shown by the precipitate in the calcium hydroxide solution in d. any unchanged carbon monoxide is collected over water in f. ~carbon disulphide~ (cs_{ }). just as carbon combines with oxygen to form carbon dioxide, so it combines with sulphur to form carbon disulphide (cs_{ }). this compound has been described in the chapter on sulphur. ~hydrocyanic acid~ (_prussic acid_)(hcn). under the proper conditions carbon unites with nitrogen and hydrogen to form the acid hcn, called hydrocyanic acid. it is a weak, volatile acid, and is therefore easily prepared by treating its salts with sulphuric acid: kcn + h_{ }so_{ } = khso_{ } + hcn. it is most familiar as a gas, though it condenses to a colorless liquid boiling at °. it has a peculiar odor, suggesting bitter almonds, and is extremely poisonous either when inhaled or when taken into the stomach. a single drop may cause death. it dissolves readily in water, its solution being commonly called prussic acid. the salts of hydrocyanic acid are called _cyanides_, the cyanides of sodium and potassium being the best known. these are white solids and are extremely poisonous. ~solutions of potassium cyanide are alkaline.~ a solution of potassium cyanide turns red litmus blue, and must therefore contain hydroxyl ions. the presence of these ions is accounted for in the following way. although water is so little dissociated into its ions h^{+} and oh^{-} that for most purposes we may neglect the dissociation, it is nevertheless measurably dissociated. hydrocyanic acid is one of the weakest of acids, and dissociates to an extremely slight extent. when a cyanide such as potassium cyanide dissolves it freely dissociates, and the cn^{-} ions must come to an equilibrium with the h^{+} ions derived from the water: h^{+} + cn^{-} <--> hcn. the result of this equilibrium is that quite a number of h^{+} ions from the water are converted into undissociated hcn molecules. but for every h^{+} ion so removed an oh^{-} ion remains free, and this will give the solution alkaline properties. exercises . how can you prove that the composition of the different allotropic forms of carbon is the same? . are lampblack and bone black allotropic forms of carbon? will equal amounts of heat be liberated in the combustion of g. of each? . how could you judge of the relative purity of different forms of carbon? . apart from its color, why should carbon be useful in the preparation of inks and paints? . could asbestos fibers be used to replace the wire in a safety lamp? . why do most acids decompose carbonates? . what effect would doubling the pressure have upon the solubility of carbon dioxide in water? . what compound would be formed by passing carbon dioxide into a solution of ammonium hydroxide? write the equation. . write equations for the preparation of k_{ }co_{ }; of baco_{ }; of mgco_{ }. . in what respects are carbonic and sulphurous acids similar? . give three reasons why the reaction which takes place when a solution of calcium acid carbonate is heated, completes itself. . how could you distinguish between carbonates and sulphites? . how could you distinguish between oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, nitrous oxide, and carbon dioxide? . could a solution of sodium hydroxide be substituted for the solution of calcium hydroxide in testing for carbon dioxide? . what weight of sodium hydroxide is necessary to neutralize the carbonic acid formed by the action of hydrochloric acid on g. of calcium carbonate? . what weight of calcium carbonate would be necessary to prepare sufficient carbon dioxide to saturate l. of water at ° and under ordinary pressure? . on the supposition that calcium carbide costs cents a kilogram, what would be the cost of an amount sufficient to generate l. of acetylene measured at ° and mm.? . how would the volume of a definite amount of carbon monoxide compare with the volume of carbon dioxide formed by its combustion, the measurements being made under the same conditions? chapter xviii flames,--illuminants ~conditions necessary for flames.~ it has been seen that when two substances unite chemically, with the production of light and heat, the act of union is called combustion. when one of the substances undergoing combustion remains solid at the temperature occasioned by the combustion, light may be given off, but there is no flame. thus iron wire burning in oxygen throws off a shower of sparks and is brilliantly incandescent, but no flame is seen. when, however, both of the substances are gases or vapors at the temperature reached in the combustion, the act of union is accompanied by a flame. ~flames from burning liquids or solids.~ many substances which are liquids or solids at ordinary temperatures burn with a flame because the heat of combustion vaporizes them slowly, and the flame is due to the union of this vapor with the gas supporting the combustion. ~supporter of combustion.~ that gas which surrounds the flame and constitutes the atmosphere in which the combustion occurs is said to support the combustion. the other gas which issues into this atmosphere is said to be the combustible gas. thus, in the ordinary combustion of coal gas in the air the coal gas is said to be combustible, while the air is regarded as the supporter of combustion. these terms are entirely relative, however, for a jet of air issuing into an atmosphere of coal gas will burn when ignited, the coal gas supporting the combustion. ordinarily, when we say that a gas is combustible we mean that it is combustible in an atmosphere of air. [illustration: fig. ] ~either gas may be the supporter of combustion.~ that the terms _combustible_ and _supporter of combustion_ are merely relative may be shown in the following way: a lamp chimney a is fitted with a cork and glass tubes, as shown in fig. . the tube c should have a diameter of from to mm. a thin sheet of asbestos in which is cut a circular opening about cm. in diameter is placed over the top of the chimney. the opening in the asbestos is closed with the palm of the hand, and gas is admitted to the chimney through the tube b. the air in the chimney is soon expelled through the tube c, and the gas itself is then lighted at the lower end of this tube. the hand is now removed from the opening in the asbestos, when the flame at the end of the tube at once rises and appears at the end within the chimney, as shown in the figure. the excess of coal gas now escapes from the opening in the asbestos and may be lighted. the flame at the top of the asbestos board is due to the combustion of coal gas in air, while the flame within the chimney is due to the combustion of air in coal gas, the air being drawn up through the tube by the escaping gas. ~appearance of flames.~ the flame caused by the union of hydrogen and oxygen is almost colorless and invisible. chlorine and hydrogen combine with a pale violet flame, carbon monoxide burns in oxygen with a blue flame, while ammonia burns with a deep yellow flame. the color and appearance of flames are therefore often quite characteristic of the particular combustion which occasions them. ~structure of flames.~ when the gas undergoing combustion issues from a round opening into an atmosphere of the gas supporting combustion, as is the case with the burning bunsen burner (fig. ), the flame is generally conical in outline. it consists of several distinct cones, one within the other, the boundary between them being marked by differences of color or luminosity. in the simplest flame, of which hydrogen burning in oxygen is a good example, these cones are two in number,--an inner one, formed by unburned gas, and an outer one, usually more or less luminous, consisting of the combining gases. this outer one is in turn surrounded by a third envelope of the products of combustion; this envelope is sometimes invisible, as in the present case, but is sometimes faintly luminous. the lower part of the inner cone of the flame is quite cool and consists of unburned gas. toward the top of the inner cone the gas has become heated to a high temperature by the burning envelope surrounding it. on reaching the supporter of combustion on the outside it is far above its kindling temperature, and combustion follows with the evolution of much heat. the region of combustion just outside the inner cone is therefore the hottest part of the flame. [illustration: fig. ] ~oxidizing and reducing flames.~ since the tip of the outside cone consists of very hot products of combustion mixed with oxygen from the air, a substance capable of oxidation placed in this part of the flame becomes very hot and is easily oxidized. the oxygen with which it combines comes, of course, from the atmosphere, and not from the products of combustion. this outer tip of the flame is called the _oxidizing flame_. at the tip of the inner cone the conditions are quite different. this region consists of a highly heated combustible gas, which has not yet reached a supply of oxygen. if a substance rich in oxygen, such as a metallic oxide, is placed in this region of the flame, the heated gases combine with its oxygen and the substance is reduced. this part of the flame is called the _reducing flame_. these flames are used in testing certain substances, especially minerals. for this purpose they are produced by blowing into a small luminous bunsen flame from one side through a blowpipe. this is a tube of the shape shown in fig. . the flame is directed in any desired way and has the oxidizing and reducing regions very clearly marked (fig. ). it is non-luminous from the same causes which render the open bunsen burner flame non-luminous, the gases from the lungs serving to furnish oxygen and to dilute the combustible gas. [illustration: fig. ] [illustration: fig. ] ~luminosity of flames.~ the luminosity of flames is due to a number of distinct causes, and may therefore be increased or diminished in several ways. . _presence of solid matter._ the most obvious of these causes is the presence in the flame of incandescent solid matter. thus chalk dust sifted into a non-luminous flame renders it luminous. when hydrocarbons form a part of the combustible gas, as they do in nearly all illuminating gases and oils, some carbon is usually set free in the process of combustion. this is made very hot by the flame and becomes incandescent, giving out light. in a well-regulated flame it is afterward burned up, but when the supply of oxygen is insufficient it escapes from the flame as lampblack or soot. that it is temporarily present in a well-burning luminous flame may be demonstrated by holding a cold object, such as a small evaporating dish, in the flame for a few seconds. this cold object cools the carbon below its kindling temperature, and it is deposited on the object as soot. . _pressure._ a second factor in the luminosity of flames is the pressure under which the gases are burning. under increased pressure there is more matter in a given volume of a gas, and the chemical action is more energetic than when the gases are rarefied. consequently there is more heat and light. a candle burning on a high mountain gives less light than when it burns at the sea level. if the gas is diluted with a non-combustible gas, the effect is the same as if it is rarefied, for under these conditions there is less combustible gas in a given volume. . _temperature._ the luminosity also depends upon the temperature attained in the combustion. in general the hotter the flame the greater the luminosity; hence cooling the gases before combustion diminishes the luminosity of the flame they will make, because it diminishes the temperature attained in the combustion. thus the luminosity of the bunsen flame is largely diminished by the air drawn up with the gas. this is due in part to the fact that the burning gas is diluted and cooled by the air drawn in. the oxygen thus introduced into the flame also causes the combustion of the hot particles of carbon which would otherwise tend to make the flame luminous. ~illuminating and fuel gases.~ a number of mixtures of combustible gases, consisting largely of carbon compounds and hydrogen, find extensive use for the production of light and heat. the three chief varieties are coal gas, water gas, and natural gas. the use of acetylene gas has already been referred to. ~coal gas.~ coal gas is made by heating bituminous coal in large retorts out of contact with the air. soft or bituminous coal contains, in addition to large amounts of carbon, considerable quantities of compounds of hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and sulphur. when distilled the nitrogen is liberated partly in the form of ammonia and cyanides and partly as free nitrogen gas; the sulphur is converted into hydrogen sulphide, carbon disulphide, and oxides of sulphur; the oxygen into water and oxides of carbon. the remaining hydrogen is set free partly as hydrogen and partly in combination with carbon in the form of hydrocarbons. the most important of these is methane, with smaller quantities of many others, some of which are liquids or solids at ordinary temperatures. the great bulk of the carbon remains behind as coke and retort carbon. ~the manufacture of coal gas.~ in the manufacture of coal gas it is necessary to separate from the volatile constituents formed by the heating of the coal all those substances which are either solid or liquid at ordinary temperature, since these would clog the gas pipes. certain gaseous constituents, such as hydrogen sulphide and ammonia, must also be removed. the method used to accomplish this is shown in fig. . the coal is heated in air-tight retorts illustrated by a. the volatile products escape through the pipe x and bubble into the tarry liquid in the large pipe b, known as the _hydraulic main_, which runs at right angles to the retorts. here is deposited the greater portion of the solid and liquid products, forming a tarry mass known as _coal tar_. much of the ammonia also remains dissolved in this liquid. the partially purified gas then passes into the pipes c, which serve to cool it and further remove the solid and liquid matter. the gas then passes into d, which is filled with coke over which a jet of water is sprayed. the water still further cools the gas and at the same time partially removes such gaseous products as hydrogen sulphide and ammonia, which are soluble in water. in e the gas passes over some material such as lime, which removes the last portions of the sulphur compounds as well as much of the carbon dioxide present. from e the gas passes into the large gas holder f, from which it is distributed through pipes to the places where it is burned. [illustration: fig. ] one ton of good gas coal yields approximately , cu. ft. of gas, lb. of coke, lb. of tar, and gal. of ammoniacal liquor. not only is the ammonia obtained in the manufacture of the gas of great importance, but the coal tar also serves as the source of many very useful substances, as will be explained in chapter xxxii. ~water gas.~ water gas is essentially a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. it is made by passing steam over very hot anthracite coal, when the reaction shown in the following equation takes place: c + h_{ }o = co + h. when required merely to produce heat the gas is at once ready for use. when made for illuminating purposes it must be enriched, that is, illuminants must be added, since both carbon monoxide and hydrogen burn with non-luminous flames. this is accomplished by passing it into heaters containing highly heated petroleum oils. the gas takes up hydrocarbon gases formed in the decomposition of the petroleum oils, which make it burn with a luminous flame. water gas is very effective as a fuel, since both carbon monoxide and hydrogen burn with very hot flames. it has little odor and is very poisonous. its use is therefore attended with some risk, since leaks in pipes are very likely to escape notice. ~natural gas.~ this substance, so abundant in many localities, varies much in composition, but is composed principally of methane. when used for lighting purposes it is usually burned in a burner resembling an open bunsen, the illumination being furnished by an incandescent mantle. this is the case in the familiar welsbach burner. contrary to statements frequently made, natural gas contains no free hydrogen. table showing composition of gases =====================+================+========+========+========== | pennsylvania | coal | water | enriched | natural | gas | gas | water | gas | | | gas ---------------------+----------------+--------+--------+---------- hydrogen | | . | . | . methane | . | . | . | . illuminants | | . | | . carbon monoxide | | . | . | . carbon dioxide | . | . | . | . nitrogen | . | . | . | . oxygen | | . | | . hydrocarbon vapors | | . | | . =====================+================+========+========+========== these are analyses of actual samples, and may be taken as about the average for the various kinds of gases. any one of these may vary considerably. the nitrogen and oxygen in most cases is due to a slight admixture of air which is difficult to exclude entirely in the manufacture and handling of gases. ~fuels.~ a variety of substances are used as fuels, the most important of them being wood, coal, and the various gases mentioned above. wood consists mainly of compounds of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. the composition of coal and the fuel gases has been given. since these fuels are composed principally of carbon and hydrogen or their compounds, the chief products of combustion are carbon dioxide and water. the practice of heating rooms with portable gas or oil stoves with no provision for removing the products of combustion is to be condemned, since the carbon dioxide is generated in sufficient quantities to render the air unfit for breathing. rooms so heated also become very damp from the large amount of water vapor formed in the combustion, and which in cold weather condenses on the window glass, causing the glass to "sweat." both coal and wood contain a certain amount of mineral substances which constitute the ashes. ~the electric furnace.~ in recent years electric furnaces have come into wide use in operations requiring a very high temperature. temperatures as high as ° can be easily reached, whereas the hottest oxyhydrogen flame is not much above °. these furnaces are constructed on one of two general principles. [illustration: fig. ] . _arc furnaces._ in the one type the source of heat is an electric arc formed between carbon electrodes separated a little from each other, as shown in fig. . the substance to be heated is placed in a vessel, usually a graphite crucible, just below the arc. the electrodes and crucible are surrounded by materials which fuse with great difficulty, such as magnesium oxide, the walls of the furnace being so shaped as to reflect the heat downwards upon the contents of the crucible. [illustration: fig. ] . _resistance furnaces._ in the other type of furnace the heat is generated by the resistance offered to the current in its passage through the furnace. in its simplest form it may be represented by fig. . the furnace is merely a rectangular box built up of loose bricks. the electrodes e, each consisting of a bundle of carbon rods, are introduced through the sides of the furnace. the materials to be heated, c, are filled into the furnace up to the electrodes, and a layer of broken coke is arranged so as to extend from one electrode to the other. more of the charge is then placed on top of the coke. in passing through the broken coke the electrical current encounters great resistance. this generates great heat, and the charge surrounding the coke is brought to a very high temperature. the advantage of this type of furnace is that the temperature can be regulated to any desired intensity. exercises . why does charcoal usually burn with no flame? how do you account for the flame sometimes observed when it burns? . how do you account for the fact that a candle burns with a flame? . what two properties must the mantle used in the welsbach lamp possess? . (a) in what respects does the use of the welsbach mantle resemble that of lime in the calcium light? (b) if the mantle were made of carbon, would it serve the same purpose? . would anthracite coal be suitable for the manufacture of coal gas? . how could you prove the formation of carbon dioxide and water in the combustion of illuminating gases? . suggest a probable way in which natural gas has been formed. . coal frequently contains a sulphide of iron. (a) what two sulphur compounds are likely to be formed when gas is made from such coal? (b) suggest some suitable method for the removal of these compounds. . why does the use of the bellows on the blacksmith's forge cause a more intense heat? . what volume of oxygen is necessary to burn l. of marsh gas and what volume of carbon dioxide would be formed, all of the gases being measured under standard conditions? . suppose a cubic meter of pennsylvania natural gas, measured under standard conditions, were to be burned. how much water by weight would result? chapter xix molecular weights, atomic weights, formulas ~introduction.~ in the chapter on the atomic theory, it was shown that if it were true that two elements uniting to form a compound always combined in the ratio of one atom of one element to one atom of the other element, it would be a very easy matter to decide upon figures which would represent the relative weights of the different atoms. it would only be necessary to select some one element as a standard and determine the weight of every element which combines with a definite weight (say g.) of the standard element. the figures so obtained would evidently represent the relative weights of the atoms. but the law of multiple proportion at once reminds us that two elements may unite in several proportions; and there is no simple way to determine the number of atoms present in the molecule of any compound. consequently the problem of deciding upon the relative atomic weights is not an easy one. to the solution of this problem we must now turn. ~dalton's method of determining atomic weights.~ when dalton first advanced the atomic theory he attempted to solve this problem by very simple methods. he thought that when only one compound of two elements is known it is reasonable to suppose that it contains one atom of each element. he therefore gave the formula ho to water, and hn to ammonia. when more than two compounds were known he assumed that the most familiar or the most stable one had the simple formula. he then determined the atomic weight as explained above. the results he obtained were contradictory and very far from satisfactory, and it was soon seen that some other method, resting on much more scientific grounds, must be found to decide what compounds, if any, have a single atom of each element present. ~determination of atomic weights.~ three distinct steps are involved in the determination of the atomic weight of an element: ( ) determination of the equivalent, ( ) determination of molecular weights of its compounds, and ( ) deduction of the exact atomic weight from the equivalent and molecular weights. ~ . determination of the equivalent.~ by the equivalent of an element is meant the weight of the element which will combine with a fixed weight of some other element chosen as a standard. it has already been explained that oxygen has been selected as the standard element for atomic weights, with a weight of . this same standard will serve very well as a standard for equivalents. _the equivalent of an element is the weight of the element which will combine with g. of oxygen._ thus g. of oxygen combines with . g. of sulphur, . g. of zinc, . g. of silver, . g. of chlorine. these figures, therefore, represent the equivalent weights of these elements. ~relation of atomic weights to equivalents.~ according to the atomic theory combination always takes place between whole numbers of atoms. thus one atom unites with one other, or with two or three; or two atoms may unite with three, or three with five, and so on. when oxygen combines with zinc the combination must be between definite numbers of the two kinds of atoms. experiment shows that these two elements combine in the ratio of g. of oxygen to . g. of zinc. if one atom of oxygen combines with one atom of zinc, then this ratio must be the ratio between the weights of the two atoms. if one atom of oxygen combines with two atoms of zinc, then the ratio between the weights of the two atoms will be : . . if two atoms of oxygen combine with one atom of zinc, the ratio by weight between the two atoms will be : . . it is evident, therefore, that the real atomic weight of an element must be some multiple or submultiple of the equivalent; in other words, the equivalent multiplied by / , , , or will give the atomic weight. ~combining weights.~ a very interesting relation holds good between the equivalents of the various elements. we have just seen that the figures . , . , . , and . are the equivalents respectively of sulphur, zinc, silver, and chlorine. these same figures represent the ratios by weight in which these elements combine among themselves. thus . g. of silver combine with . g. of chlorine and with × . g. of sulphur. . g. of zinc combine with . g. of chlorine and × . g. of sulphur. by taking the equivalent or some multiple of it a value can be obtained for each element which will represent its combining value, and for this reason is called its _combining weight_. it is important to notice that the fact that a combining weight can be obtained for each element is not a part of a theory, but is the direct result of experiment. ~elements with more than one equivalent.~ it will be remembered that oxygen combines with hydrogen in two ratios. in one case g. of oxygen combine with . g. of hydrogen to form water; in the other g. of oxygen combine with . g. of hydrogen to form hydrogen dioxide. the equivalents of hydrogen are therefore . and . . barium combines with oxygen in two proportions: in barium oxide the proportion is g. of oxygen to . g. of barium; in barium dioxide the proportion is g. of oxygen to . g. of barium. in each case one equivalent is a simple multiple of the other, so the fact that there may be two equivalents does not add to the uncertainty. all we knew before was that the true atomic weight is some multiple of the equivalent. ~ . the determination of molecular weights.~ to decide the question as to which multiple of the equivalent correctly represents the atomic weight of an element, it has been found necessary to devise a method of determining the molecular weights of compounds containing the element in question. since the molecular weight of a compound is merely the sum of the weights of all the atoms present in it, it would seem to be impossible to determine the molecular weight of a compound without first knowing the atomic weights of the constituent atoms, and how many atoms of each element are present in the molecule. but certain facts have been discovered which suggest a way in which this can be done. ~avogadro's hypothesis.~ we have seen that the laws of boyle, charles, and gay-lussac apply to all gases irrespective of their chemical character. this would lead to the inference that the structure of gases must be quite simple, and that it is much the same in all gases. in avogadro, an italian physicist, suggested that if we assume all gases under the same conditions of temperature and pressure to have the same number of molecules in a given volume, we shall have a probable explanation of the simplicity of the gas laws. it is difficult to prove the truth of this hypothesis by a simple experiment, but there are so many facts known which are in complete harmony with this suggestion that there is little doubt that it expresses the truth. avogadro's hypothesis may be stated thus: _equal volumes of all gases under the same conditions of temperature and pressure contain the same number of molecules._ ~avogadro's hypothesis and molecular weights.~ assuming that avogadro's hypothesis is correct, we have a very simple means for deciding upon the relative weights of molecules; for if equal volumes of two gases contain the same number of molecules, the weights of the two volumes must be in the same ratio as the weights of the individual molecules which they contain. if we adopt some one gas as a standard, we can express the weights of all other gases as compared with this one, and the same figures will express the relative weights of the molecules of which the gases are composed. ~oxygen as the standard.~ it is important that the same standard should be adopted for the determination of molecular weights as has been decided upon for atomic weights and equivalents, so that the three values may be in harmony with each other. accordingly it is best to adopt oxygen as the standard element with which to compare the molecular weights of other gases, being careful to keep the oxygen atom equal to . ~the oxygen molecule contains two atoms.~ one point must not be overlooked, however. we desire to have our unit, the oxygen _atom_, equal to . the method of comparing the weights of gases just suggested compares the molecules of the gases with the _molecule_ of oxygen. is the molecule and the atom of oxygen the same thing? this question is answered by the following considerations. we have seen that when steam is formed by the union of oxygen and hydrogen, two volumes of hydrogen combine with one volume of oxygen to form two volumes of steam. let us suppose that the one volume of oxygen contains molecules; then the two volumes of steam must, according to avogadro's hypothesis, contain molecules. but each of these molecules must contain at least one atom of oxygen, or in all, and these atoms came from molecules of oxygen. it follows that each molecule of oxygen must contain at least two atoms of oxygen. evidently this reasoning merely shows that there are _at least_ two atoms in the oxygen molecule. there may be more than that, but as there is no evidence to this effect, we assume that the molecule contains two atoms only. it is evident that if we wish to retain the value for the atom of oxygen we must take twice this value, or , for the value of the oxygen molecule, when using it as a standard for molecular weights. ~determination of the molecular weights of gases from their weights compared with oxygen.~ assuming the molecular weight of oxygen to be , avogadro's hypothesis gives us a ready means for determining the molecular weight of any other gas, for all that is required is to know its weight compared with that of an equal volume of oxygen. for example, l. of chlorine is found by experiment to weigh . times as much as l. of oxygen. the molecular weight of chlorine must therefore be . × , or . . if, instead of comparing the relative weights of l. of the two gases, we select such a volume of oxygen as will weigh g., or the weight in grams corresponding to the molecular weight of the gas, the calculation is much simplified. it has been found that g. of oxygen, under standard conditions, measure . l. this same volume of hydrogen weighs . g.; of chlorine . g.; of hydrochloric acid . g. the weights of these equal volumes must be proportional to their molecular weights, and since the weight of the oxygen is the same as the value of its molecular weight, so too will the weights of the . l. of the other gases be equal to the value of their molecular weights. as a summary we can then make the following statement: _the molecular weight of any gas may be determined by calculating the weight of . l. of the gas, measured under standard conditions._ ~determination of molecular weights from density of gases.~ in an actual experiment it is easier to determine the density of a gas than the weight of a definite volume of it. the density of a gas is usually defined as its weight compared with that of an equal volume of air. having determined the density of a gas, its weight compared with oxygen may be determined by multiplying its density by the ratio between the weights of air and oxygen. this ratio is . . to compare it with our standard for atomic weights we must further multiply it by , since the standard is / the weight of oxygen molecules. the steps then are these: . determine the density of the gas (its weight compared with air). . multiply by . to make the comparison with oxygen molecules. . multiply by to make the comparison with the unit for atomic weights. we have, then, the formula: molecular weight = density × . × ; or, still more briefly, m. = d. × . . the value found by this method for the determination of molecular weights will of course agree with those found by calculating the weight of . l. of the gas, since both methods depend on the same principles. [illustration: fig. ] ~determination of densities of gases.~ the relative weights of equal volumes of two gases can be easily determined. the following is one of the methods used. a small flask, such as is shown in fig. , is filled with one of the gases, and after the temperature and pressure have been noted the flask is sealed up and weighed. the tip of the sealed end is then broken off, the flask filled with the second gas, and its weight determined. if the weight of the empty flask is subtracted from these two weighings, the relative weights of the gases is readily found. ~ . deduction of atomic weights from molecular weights and equivalents.~ we have now seen how the equivalent of an element and the molecular weight of compounds containing the element can be obtained. let us see how it is possible to decide which multiple of the equivalent really is the true atomic weight. as an example, let us suppose that the equivalent of nitrogen has been found to be . and that it is desired to obtain its atomic weight. the next step is to obtain the molecular weights of a large number of compounds containing nitrogen. the following will serve: ==================+============+=============+================+============== | | approximate | percentage of | part of | density by | molecular | nitrogen by | molecular | experiment | weight | experiment | weight due | | (d. × . ) | | to nitrogen ------------------+------------+-------------+----------------+-------------- nitrogen gas | . | . | . | . nitrous oxide | . | . | . | . nitric oxide | . | . | . | . nitrogen peroxide | . | . | . | . ammonia | . | . | . | . nitric acid | . | . | . | . hydrocyanic acid | . | . | . | . ==================+============+=============+================+============== ~method of calculation.~ the densities of the various gases in the first column of this table are determined by experiment, and are fairly accurate but not entirely so. by multiplying these densities by . the molecular weights of the compounds as given in the second column are obtained. by chemical analysis it is possible to determine the percentage composition of these substances, and the percentages of nitrogen in them as determined by analysis are given in the third column. if each of these molecular weights is multiplied in turn by the percentage of nitrogen in the compound, the product will be the weight of the nitrogen in the molecular weight of the compound. this will be the sum of the weights of the nitrogen atoms in the molecule. these values are given in the fourth column in the table. if a large number of compounds containing nitrogen are studied in this way, it is probable that there will be included in the list at least one substance whose molecule contains a single nitrogen atom. in this case the number in the fourth column will be the approximate atomic weight of nitrogen. on comparing the values for nitrogen in the table it will be seen that a number which is approximately is the smallest, and that the others are multiples of this. these compounds of higher value, therefore, contain more than one nitrogen atom in the molecule. ~accurate determination of atomic weights.~ molecular weights cannot be determined very accurately, and consequently the part in them due to nitrogen is a little uncertain, as will be seen in the table. all we can tell by this method is that the true weight is very near . the equivalent can however be determined very accurately, and we have seen that it is some multiple or submultiple of the true atomic weight. since molecular-weight determinations have shown that in the case of nitrogen the atomic weight is near , and we have found the equivalent to be . , it is evident that the true atomic weight is twice the equivalent, or . × = . . ~summary.~ these, then, are the steps necessary to establish the atomic weight of an element. . determine the equivalent accurately by analysis. . determine the molecular weight of a large number of compounds of the element, and by analysis the part of the molecular weight due to the element. the smallest number so obtained will be approximately the atomic weight. . multiply the equivalent by the small whole number (usually , , or ), which will make a number very close to the approximate atomic weight. the figure so obtained will be the true atomic weight. ~molecular weights of the elements.~ it will be noticed that the molecular weight of nitrogen obtained by multiplying its density by . is . . yet the atomic weight of nitrogen as deduced from a study of its gaseous compounds is . . the simplest explanation that can be given for this is that the gaseous nitrogen is made up of molecules, each of which contains two atoms. in this respect it resembles oxygen; for we have seen that an entirely different line of reasoning leads us to believe that the molecule of oxygen contains two atoms. when we wish to indicate molecules of these gases the symbols n_{ } and o_{ } should be used. when we desire to merely show the weights taking part in a reaction this is not necessary. the vapor densities of many of the elements show that, like oxygen and nitrogen, their molecules consist of two atoms. in other cases, particularly among the metals, the molecule and the atom are identical. still other elements have four atoms in their molecules. while oxygen contains two atoms in its molecules, a study of ozone has led to the conclusion that it has three. the formation of ozone from oxygen can therefore be represented by the equation o_{ } = o_{ }. ~other methods of determining molecular weights.~ it will be noticed that avogadro's law gives us a method by which we can determine the relative weights of the molecules of two gases because it enables us to tell when we are dealing with an equal number of the two kinds of molecules. if by any other means we can get this information, we can make use of the knowledge so gained to determine the molecular weights of the two substances. ~raoult's laws.~ two laws have been discovered which give us just such information. they are known as raoult's laws, and can be stated as follows: . _when weights of substances which are proportional to their molecular weights are dissolved in the same weight of solvent, the rise of the boiling point is the same in each case._ . _when weights of substances which are proportional to their molecular weights are dissolved in the same weight of solvent, the lowering of the freezing point is the same in each case._ by taking advantage of these laws it is possible to determine when two solutions contain the same number of molecules of two dissolved substances, and consequently the relative molecular weights of the two substances. ~law of dulong and petit.~ in dulong and petit discovered a very interesting relation between the atomic weight of an element and its specific heat, which holds true for elements in the solid state. if equal weights of two solids, say, lead and silver, are heated through the same range of temperature, as from ° to °, it is found that very different amounts of heat are required. the amount of heat required to change the temperature of a solid or a liquid by a definite amount compared with the amount required to change the temperature of an equal weight of water by the same amount is called its specific heat. dulong and petit discovered the following law: _the specific heat of an element in the solid form multiplied by its atomic weight is approximately equal to the constant . ._ that is, at. wt. × sp. ht. = . . consequently, . at. wt. = -------- sp. ht. this law is not very accurate, but it is often possible by means of it to decide upon what multiple of the equivalent is the real atomic weight. thus the specific heat of iron is found by experiment to be . , and its equivalent is . . . ÷ . = . . we see, therefore, that the atomic weight is twice the equivalent, or . . ~how formulas are determined.~ it will be well in connection with molecular weights to consider how the formula of a compound is decided upon, for the two subjects are very closely associated. some examples will make clear the method followed. the molecular weight of a substance containing hydrogen and chlorine was . . by analysis . parts of the substance was found to contain part of hydrogen and . parts of chlorine. as these are the simple atomic weights of the two elements, the formula of the compound must be hcl. a substance consisting of oxygen and hydrogen was found to have a molecular weight of . analysis showed that in parts of the substance there were parts of hydrogen and parts of oxygen. dividing these figures by the atomic weights of the two elements, we get ÷ = for h; ÷ = for o. the formula is therefore h_{ }o_{ }. a substance containing . % h, . % s, and . % o was found to have a molecular weight of . in these parts of the substance there are × . % = parts of h, × . % = parts of s, and × . % = parts of o. if the molecule weighs , the hydrogen atoms present must together weigh , the sulphur atoms , and the oxygen atoms . dividing these figures by the respective atomic weights of the three elements, we have, for h, ÷ = atoms; for s, ÷ = atom; for o, ÷ = atoms. hence the formula is h_{ }so_{ }. we have, then, this general procedure: find the percentage composition of the substance and also its molecular weight. multiply the molecular weight successively by the percentage of each element present, to find the amount of the element in the molecular weight of the compound. the figures so obtained will be the respective parts of the molecular weight due to the several atoms. divide by the atomic weights of the respective elements, and the quotient will be the number of atoms present. ~avogadro's hypothesis and chemical calculations.~ this law simplifies many chemical calculations. . _application to volume relations in gaseous reactions._ since equal volumes of gases contain an equal number of molecules, it follows that when an equal number of gaseous molecules of two or more gases take part in a reaction, the reaction will involve equal volumes of the gases. in the equation c_{ }h_{ }o_{ } = h_{ }o + co_{ } + co, since molecule of each of the gases co_{ } and co is set free from each molecule of oxalic acid, the two substances must always be set free in equal volumes. acetylene burns in accordance with the equation c_{ }h_{ } + o_{ } = co_{ } + h_{ }o. hence volumes of acetylene will react with volumes of oxygen to form volumes of carbon dioxide and volumes of steam. that the volume relations may be correct a gaseous element must be given its molecular formula. thus oxygen must be written o_{ } and not o. . _application to weights of gases._ it will be recalled that the molecular weight of a gas is determined by ascertaining the weight of . l. of the gas. this weight in grams is called the _gram-molecular weight_ of a gas. if the molecular weight of any gas is known, the weight of a liter of the gas under standard conditions may be determined by dividing its gram-molecular weight by . . thus the gram-molecular weight of a hydrochloric acid gas is . . a liter of the gas will therefore weigh . ÷ . = . g. exercises . from the following data calculate the atomic weight of sulphur. the equivalent, as obtained by an analysis of sulphur dioxide, is . . the densities and compositions of a number of compounds containing sulphur are as follows: name density composition by percentage hydrosulphuric acid . s = . h = . sulphur dioxide . s = . o = . sulphur trioxide . s = . o = . sulphur chloride . s = . cl = . sulphuryl chloride . s = . cl = . o = . carbon disulphide . s = . c = . . calculate the formulas for compounds of the following compositions: molecular weight ( ) s = . % o = . % h = . % . ( ) ca = . s = . o = . . ( ) k = . n = . o = . . . the molecular weight of ammonia is . ; of sulphur dioxide is . ; of chlorine is . . from the molecular weight calculate the weight of l. of each of these gases. compare your results with the table on the back cover of the book. . from the molecular weight of the same gases calculate the density of each, referred to air as a standard. . a mixture of cc. of carbon monoxide and cc. of oxygen was exploded in a eudiometer, (a) what gases remained in the tube after the explosion? (b) what was the volume of each? . in what proportion must acetylene and oxygen be mixed to produce the greatest explosion? . solve problem , chapter xvii, without using molecular weights. compare your results. . solve problem , chapter xviii, without using molecular weights. compare your results. . the specific heat of aluminium is . ; of lead is . . from these specific heats calculate the atomic weights of each of the elements. chapter xx the phosphorus family ================================================== | | atomic | | melting | symbol | weight | density | point -----------+--------+---------+---------+--------- phosphorus | p | . | . | . ° arsenic | as | . | . | --- antimony | sb | . | . | ° bismuth | bi | . | . | ° ================================================== ~the family.~ the elements constituting this family belong in the same group with nitrogen and therefore resemble it in a general way. they exhibit a regular gradation of physical properties, as is shown in the above table. the same general gradation is also found in their chemical properties, phosphorus being an acid-forming element, while bismuth is essentially a metal. the other two elements are intermediate in properties. ~compounds.~ in general the elements of the family form compounds having similar composition, as is shown in the following table: ph_{ } pcl_{ } pcl_{ } p_{ }o_{ } p_{ }o_{ } ash_{ } ascl_{ } ascl_{ } as_{ }o_{ } as_{ }o_{ } sbh_{ } sbcl_{ } sbcl_{ } sb_{ }o_{ } sb_{ }o_{ } .... bicl_{ } bicl_{ } bi_{ }o_{ } bi_{ }o_{ } in the case of phosphorus, arsenic, and antimony the oxides are acid anhydrides. salts of at least four acids of each of these three elements are known, the free acid in some instances being unstable. the relation of these acids to the corresponding anhydrides may be illustrated as follows, phosphorus being taken as an example: p_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o = h_{ }po_{ } (phosphorous acid). p_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o = h_{ }po_{ } (phosphoric acid). p_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o = h_{ }p_{ }o_{ } (pyrophosphoric acid). p_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o = hpo_{ } (metaphosphoric acid). phosphorus ~history.~ the element phosphorus was discovered by the alchemist brand, of hamburg, in , while searching for the philosopher's stone. owing to its peculiar properties and the secrecy which was maintained about its preparation, it remained a very rare and costly substance until the demand for it in the manufacture of matches brought about its production on a large scale. ~occurrence.~ owing to its great chemical activity phosphorus never occurs free in nature. in the form of phosphates it is very abundant and widely distributed. _phosphorite_ and _sombrerite_ are mineral forms of calcium phosphate, while _apatite_ consists of calcium phosphate together with calcium fluoride or chloride. these minerals form very large deposits and are extensively mined for use as fertilizers. calcium phosphate is a constituent of all fertile soil, having been supplied to the soil by the disintegration of rocks containing it. it is the chief mineral constituent of bones of animals, and bone ash is therefore nearly pure calcium phosphate. ~preparation.~ phosphorus is now manufactured from bone ash or a pure mineral phosphate by heating the phosphate with sand and carbon in an electric furnace. the materials are fed in at m (fig. ) by the feed screw f. the phosphorus vapor escapes at p and is condensed under water, while the calcium silicate is tapped off as a liquid at s. the phosphorus obtained in this way is quite impure, and is purified by distillation. [illustration: fig. ] ~explanation of the reaction.~ to understand the reaction which occurs, it must be remembered that a volatile acid anhydride is expelled from its salts when heated with an anhydride which is not volatile. thus, when sodium carbonate and silicon dioxide are heated together the following reaction takes place: na_{ }co_{ } + sio_{ } = na_{ }sio_{ } + co_{ }. silicon dioxide is a less volatile anhydride than phosphoric anhydride (p_{ }o_{ }), and when strongly heated with a phosphate the phosphoric anhydride is driven out, thus: ca_{ }(po_{ })_{ } + sio_{ } = casio_{ } + p_{ }o_{ }. if carbon is added before the heat is applied, the p_{ }o_{ } is reduced to phosphorus at the same time, according to the equation p_{ }o_{ } + c = p + co. ~physical properties.~ the purified phosphorus is a pale yellowish, translucent, waxy solid which melts at . ° and boils at °. it can therefore be cast into any convenient form under warm water, and is usually sold in the market in the form of sticks. it is quite soft and can be easily cut with a knife, but this must always be done while the element is covered with water, since it is extremely inflammable, and the friction of the knife blade is almost sure to set it on fire if cut in the air. it is not soluble in water, but is freely soluble in some other liquids, notably in carbon disulphide. its density is . . ~chemical properties.~ exposed to the air phosphorus slowly combines with oxygen, and in so doing emits a pale light, or phosphorescence, which can be seen only in a dark place. the heat of the room may easily raise the temperature to the kindling point of phosphorus, when it burns with a sputtering flame, giving off dense fumes of oxide of phosphorus. it burns with dazzling brilliancy in oxygen, and combines directly with many other elements, especially with sulphur and the halogens. on account of its great affinity for oxygen it is always preserved under water. phosphorus is very poisonous, from . to . gram being a fatal dose. ground up with flour and water or similar substances, it is often used as a poison for rats and other vermin. ~precaution.~ the heat of the body is sufficient to raise phosphorus above its kindling temperature, and for this reason it should always be handled with forceps and never with the bare fingers. burns occasioned by it are very painful and slow in healing. ~red phosphorus.~ on standing, yellow phosphorus gradually undergoes a remarkable change, being converted into a dark red powder which has a density of . . it no longer takes fire easily, neither does it dissolve in carbon disulphide. it is not poisonous and, in fact, seems to be an entirely different substance. the velocity of this change increases with rise in temperature, and the red phosphorus is therefore prepared by heating the yellow just below the boiling point ( °- °). when distilled and quickly condensed the red form changes back to the yellow. this is in accordance with the general rule that when a substance capable of existing in several allotropic forms is condensed from a gas or crystallized from the liquid state, the more unstable variety forms first, and this then passes into the more stable forms. ~matches.~ the chief use of phosphorus is in the manufacture of matches. common matches are made by first dipping the match sticks into some inflammable substance, such as melted paraffin, and afterward into a paste consisting of ( ) phosphorus, ( ) some oxidizing substance, such as manganese dioxide or potassium chlorate, and ( ) a binding material, usually some kind of glue. on friction the phosphorus is ignited, the combustion being sustained by the oxidizing agent and communicated to the wood by the burning paraffin. in sulphur matches the paraffin is replaced by sulphur. in safety matches _red_ phosphorus, an oxidizing agent, and some gritty material such as emery is placed on the side of the box, while the match tip is provided as before with an oxidizing agent and an easily oxidized substance, usually antimony sulphide. the match cannot be ignited easily by friction, save on the prepared surface. ~compounds of phosphorus with hydrogen.~ phosphorus forms several compounds with hydrogen, the best known of which is phosphine (ph_{ }) analogous to ammonia (nh_{ }). ~preparation of phosphine.~ phosphine is usually made by heating phosphorus with a strong solution of potassium hydroxide, the reaction being a complicated one. [illustration: fig. ] the experiment can be conveniently made in the apparatus shown in fig. . a strong solution of potassium hydroxide together with several small bits of phosphorus are placed in the flask a, and a current of coal gas is passed into the flask through the tube b until all the air has been displaced. the gas is then turned off and the flask is heated. phosphine is formed in small quantities and escapes through the delivery tube, the exit of which is just covered by the water in the vessel c. each bubble of the gas as it escapes into the air takes fire, and the product of combustion (p_{ }o_{ }) forms beautiful small rings, which float unbroken for a considerable time in quiet air. the pure phosphine does not take fire spontaneously. when prepared as directed above, impurities are present which impart this property. ~properties.~ phosphine is a gas of unpleasant odor and is exceedingly poisonous. like ammonia it forms salts with the halogen acids. thus we have phosphonium chloride (ph_{ }cl) analogous to ammonium chloride (nh_{ }cl). the phosphonium salts are of but little importance. ~oxides of phosphorus.~ phosphorus forms two well-known oxides,--the trioxide (p_{ }o_{ }) and the pentoxide (p_{ }o_{ }), sometimes called phosphoric anhydride. when phosphorus burns in an insufficient supply of air the product is partially the trioxide; in oxygen or an excess of air the pentoxide is formed. the pentoxide is much the better known of the two. it is a snow-white, voluminous powder whose most marked property is its great attraction for water. it has no chemical action upon most gases, so that they can be very thoroughly dried by allowing them to pass through properly arranged vessels containing phosphorus pentoxide. ~acids of phosphorus.~ the important acids of phosphorus are the following: h_{ }po_{ } phosphorous acid. h_{ }po_{ } phosphoric acid. h_{ }p_{ }o_{ } pyrophosphoric acid. hpo_{ } metaphosphoric acid. these may be regarded as combinations of the oxides of phosphorus with water according to the equations given in the discussion of the characteristics of the family. . _phosphorous acid_ (h_{ }po_{ }). neither the acid nor its salts are at all frequently met with in chemical operations. it can be easily obtained, however, in the form of transparent crystals when phosphorus trichloride is treated with water and the resulting solution is evaporated: pcl_{ } + h_{ }o = h_{ }po_{ } + hcl. its most interesting property is its tendency to take up oxygen and pass over into phosphoric acid. . _orthophosphoric acid (phosphoric acid)_ (h_{ }po_{ }). this acid can be obtained by dissolving phosphorus pentoxide in boiling water, as represented in the equation p_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o = h_{ }po_{ }. it is usually made by treating calcium phosphate with concentrated sulphuric acid. the calcium sulphate produced in the reaction is nearly insoluble, and can be filtered off, leaving the phosphoric acid in solution. very pure acid is made by oxidizing phosphorus with nitric acid. it forms large colorless crystals which are exceedingly soluble in water. being a tribasic acid, it forms acid as well as normal salts. thus the following compounds of sodium are known: nah_{ }po_{ } monosodium hydrogen phosphate. na_{ }hpo_{ } disodium hydrogen phosphate. na_{ }po_{ } normal sodium phosphate. these salts are sometimes called respectively primary, secondary, and tertiary phosphates. they may be prepared by bringing together phosphoric acid and appropriate quantities of sodium hydroxide. phosphoric acid also forms mixed salts, that is, salts containing two different metals. the most familiar compound of this kind is microcosmic salt, which has the formula na(nh_{ })hpo_{ }. _orthophosphates._ the orthophosphates form an important class of salts. the normal salts are nearly all insoluble and many of them occur in nature. the secondary phosphates are as a rule insoluble, while most of the primary salts are soluble. . _pyrophosphoric acid_ (h_{ }p_{ }o_{ }). on heating orthophosphoric acid to about ° pyrophosphoric acid is formed in accordance with the following equation: h_{ }po_{ } = h_{ }p_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o. it is a white crystalline solid. its salts can be prepared by heating a secondary phosphate: na_{ }hpo_{ } = na_{ }p_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o. . _metaphosphoric acid (glacial phosphoric acid)_ (hpo_{ }). this acid is formed when orthophosphoric acid is heated above °: h_{ }po_{ } = hpo_{ } + h_{ }o. it is also formed when phosphorus pentoxide is treated with cold water: p_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o = hpo_{ }. it is a white crystalline solid, and is so stable towards heat that it can be fused and even volatilized without decomposition. on cooling from the fused state it forms a glassy solid, and on this account is often called glacial phosphoric acid. it possesses the property of dissolving small quantities of metallic oxides, with the formation of compounds which, in the case of certain metals, have characteristic colors. it is therefore used in the detection of these metals. while the secondary phosphates, on heating, give salts of pyrophosphoric acid, the primary phosphates yield salts of metaphosphoric acid. the equations representing these reactions are as follows: na_{ }hpo_{ } = na_{ }p_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o, nah_{ }po_{ } = napo_{ } + h_{ }o. ~fertilizers.~ when crops are produced year after year on the same field certain constituents of the soil essential to plant growth are removed, and the soil becomes impoverished and unproductive. to make the land once more fertile these constituents must be replaced. the calcium phosphate of the mineral deposits or of bone ash serves well as a material for restoring phosphorus to soils exhausted of that essential element; but a more soluble substance, which the plants can more readily assimilate, is desirable. it is better, therefore, to convert the insoluble calcium phosphate into the soluble primary phosphate before it is applied as fertilizer. it will be seen by reference to the formulas for the orthophosphates (see page ) that in a primary phosphate only one hydrogen atom of phosphoric acid is replaced by a metal. since the calcium atom always replaces two hydrogen atoms, it might be thought that there could be no primary calcium phosphate; but if the calcium atom replaces one hydrogen atom from each of two molecules of phosphoric acid, the salt ca(h_{ }po_{ })_{ } will result, and this is a primary phosphate. it can be made by treatment of the normal phosphate with the necessary amount of sulphuric acid, calcium sulphate being formed at the same time, thus: ca_{ }(po_{ })_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } = ca(h_{ }po_{ })_{ } + caso_{ }. the resulting mixture is a powder, which is sold as a fertilizer under the name of "superphosphate of lime." arsenic ~occurrence.~ arsenic occurs in considerable quantities in nature as the native element, as the sulphides realgar (as_{ }s_{ }) and orpiment (as_{ }s_{ }), as oxide (as_{ }o_{ }), and as a constituent of many metallic sulphides, such as arsenopyrite (feass). ~preparation.~ the element is prepared by purifying the native arsenic, or by heating the arsenopyrite in iron tubes, out of contact with air, when the reaction expressed by the following equation occurs: feass = fes + as. the arsenic, being volatile, condenses in chambers connected with the heated tubes. it is also made from the oxide by reduction with carbon: as_{ }o_{ } + c = as + co_{ }. ~properties.~ arsenic is a steel-gray, metallic-looking substance of density . . though resembling metals in appearance, it is quite brittle, being easily powdered in a mortar. when strongly heated it sublimes, that is, it passes into a vapor without melting, and condenses again to a crystalline solid when the vapor is cooled. like phosphorus it can be obtained in several allotropic forms. it alloys readily with some of the metals, and finds its chief use as an alloy with lead, which is used for making shot, the alloy being harder than pure lead. when heated on charcoal with the blowpipe it is converted into an oxide which volatilizes, leaving the charcoal unstained by any oxide coating. it burns readily in chlorine gas, forming arsenic trichloride,-- as + cl = ascl_{ }. unlike most of its compounds, the element itself is not poisonous. ~arsine~ (ash_{ }). when any compound containing arsenic is brought into the presence of nascent hydrogen, arsine (ash_{ }), corresponding to phosphine and ammonia, is formed. the reaction when oxide of arsenic is so treated is as_{ }o_{ } + h = ash_{ } + h_{ }o. arsine is a gas with a peculiar garlic-like odor, and is intensely poisonous. a single bubble of pure gas has been known to prove fatal. it is an unstable compound, decomposing into its elements when heated to a moderate temperature. it is combustible, burning with a pale bluish-white flame to form arsenic trioxide and water when air is in excess: ash_{ } + o = as_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o. when the supply of air is deficient water and metallic arsenic are formed: ash_{ } + o = h_{ }o + as. these reactions make the detection of even minute quantities of arsenic a very easy problem. [illustration: fig. ] ~marsh's test for arsenic.~ the method devised by marsh for detecting arsenic is most frequently used, the apparatus being shown in fig. . hydrogen is generated in the flask a by the action of dilute sulphuric acid on zinc, is dried by passing over calcium chloride in the tube b, and after passing through the hard-glass tube c is ignited at the jet d. if a substance containing arsenic is now introduced into the generator a, the arsenic is converted into arsine by the action of the nascent hydrogen, and passes to the jet along with the hydrogen. if the tube c is strongly heated at some point near the middle, the arsine is decomposed while passing this point and the arsenic is deposited just beyond the heated point in the form of a shining, brownish-black mirror. if the tube is not heated, the arsine burns along with the hydrogen at the jet. under these conditions a small porcelain dish crowded down into the flame is blackened by a spot of metallic arsenic, for the arsine is decomposed by the heat of the flame, and the arsenic, cooled below its kindling temperature by the cold porcelain, deposits upon it as a black spot. antimony conducts itself in the same way as arsenic, but the antimony deposit is more sooty in appearance. the two can also be distinguished by the fact that sodium hypochlorite (naclo) dissolves the arsenic deposit, but not that formed by antimony. ~oxides of arsenic.~ arsenic forms two oxides, as_{ }o_{ } and as_{ }o_{ }, corresponding to those of phosphorus. of these arsenious oxide, or arsenic trioxide (as_{ }o_{ }), is much better known, and is the substance usually called white arsenic, or merely arsenic. it is found as a mineral, but is usually obtained as a by-product in burning pyrite in the sulphuric-acid industry. the pyrite has a small amount of arsenopyrite in it, and when this is burned arsenious oxide is formed as a vapor together with sulphur dioxide: feass + o = fe_{ }o_{ } + as_{ }o_{ } + so_{ }. the arsenious oxide is condensed in appropriate chambers. it is a rather heavy substance, obtained either as a crystalline powder or as large, vitreous lumps, resembling lumps of porcelain in appearance. it is very poisonous, from . to . g. being a fatal dose. it is frequently given as a poison, since it is nearly tasteless and does not act very rapidly. this slow action is due to the fact that it is not very soluble, and hence is absorbed slowly by the system. arsenious oxide is also used as a chemical reagent in glass making and in the dye industry. ~acids of arsenic.~ like the corresponding oxides of phosphorus, the oxides of arsenic are acid anhydrides. in solution they combine with bases to form salts, corresponding to the salts of the acids of phosphorus. thus we have salts of the following acids: h_{ }aso_{ } arsenious acid. h_{ }aso_{ } orthoarsenic acid. h_{ }as_{ }o_{ } pyroarsenic acid. haso_{ } metarsenic acid. several other acids of arsenic are also known. not all of these can be obtained as free acids, since they tend to lose water and form the oxides. thus, instead of obtaining arsenious acid (h_{ }aso_{ }), the oxide as_{ }o_{ } is obtained: h_{ }aso_{ } = as_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o. salts of all the acids are known, however, and some of them have commercial value. most of them are insoluble, and some of the copper salts, which are green, are used as pigments. paris green, which has a complicated formula, is a well-known insecticide. ~antidote for arsenical poisoning.~ the most efficient antidote for arsenic poisoning is ferric hydroxide. it is prepared as needed, according to the equation fe_{ }(so_{ })_{ } + mg(oh)_{ } = fe(oh)_{ } + mgso_{ }. ~sulphides of arsenic.~ when hydrogen sulphide is passed into an acidified solution containing an arsenic compound the arsenic is precipitated as a bright yellow sulphide, thus: h_{ }aso_{ } + h_{ }s = as_{ }s_{ } + h_{ }o, h_{ }aso_{ } + h_{ }s = as_{ }s_{ } + h_{ }o. in this respect arsenic resembles the metallic elements, many of which produce sulphides under similar conditions. the sulphides of arsenic, both those produced artificially and those found in nature, are used as yellow pigments. antimony ~occurrence.~ antimony occurs in nature chiefly as the sulphide (sb_{ }s_{ }), called stibnite, though it is also found as oxide and as a constituent of many complex minerals. ~preparation.~ antimony is prepared from the sulphide in a very simple manner. the sulphide is melted with scrap iron in a furnace, when the iron combines with the sulphur to form a slag, or liquid layer of melted iron sulphide, while the heavier liquid, antimony, settles to the bottom and is drawn off from time to time. the reaction involved is represented by the equation sb_{ }s_{ } + fe = sb + fes. ~physical properties.~ antimony is a bluish-white, metallic-looking substance whose density is . . it is highly crystalline, hard, and very brittle. it has a rather low melting point ( °) and expands very noticeably on solidifying. ~chemical properties.~ in chemical properties antimony resembles arsenic in many particulars. it forms the oxides sb_{ }o_{ } and sb_{ }o_{ }, and in addition sb_{ }o_{ }. it combines with the halogen elements with great energy, burning brilliantly in chlorine to form antimony trichloride (sbcl_{ }). when heated on charcoal with the blowpipe it is oxidized and forms a coating of antimony oxide on the charcoal which has a characteristic bluish-white color. ~stibine~ (sbh_{ }). the gas stibine (sbh_{ }) is formed under conditions which are very similar to those which produce arsine, and it closely resembles the latter compound, though it is still less stable. it is very poisonous. ~acids of antimony.~ the oxides sb_{ }o_{ } and sb_{ }o_{ } are weak acid anhydrides and are capable of forming two series of acids corresponding in formulas to the acids of phosphorus and arsenic. they are much weaker, however, and are of little practical importance. ~sulphides of antimony.~ antimony resembles arsenic in that hydrogen sulphide precipitates it as a sulphide when conducted into an acidified solution containing an antimony compound: sbcl_{ } + h_{ }s = sb_{ }s_{ } + hcl, sbcl_{ } + h_{ }s = sb_{ }s_{ } + hcl. the two sulphides of antimony are called the trisulphide and the pentasulphide respectively. when prepared in this way they are orange-colored substances, though the mineral stibnite is black. ~metallic properties of antimony.~ the physical properties of the element are those of a metal, and the fact that its sulphide is precipitated by hydrogen sulphide shows that it acts like a metal in a chemical way. many other reactions show that antimony has more of the properties of a metal than of a non-metal. the compound sb(oh)_{ }, corresponding to arsenious acid, while able to act as a weak acid is also able to act as a weak base with strong acids. for example, when treated with concentrated hydrochloric acid antimony chloride is formed: sb(oh)_{ } + hcl = sbcl_{ } + h_{ }o. a number of elements act in this same way, their hydroxides under some conditions being weak acids and under others weak bases. alloys some metals when melted together thoroughly intermix, and on cooling form a homogeneous, metallic-appearing substance called an _alloy_. not all metals will mix in this way, and in some cases definite chemical compounds are formed and separate out as the mixture solidifies, thus destroying the uniform quality of the alloy. in general the melting point of the alloy is below the average of the melting points of its constituents, and it is often lower than any one of them. antimony forms alloys with many of the metals, and its chief commercial use is for such purposes. it imparts to its alloys high density, rather low melting point, and the property of expanding on solidification. such an alloy is especially useful in type founding, where fine lines are to be reproduced on a cast. type metal consists of antimony, lead, and tin. babbitt metal, used for journal bearings in machinery, contains the same metals in a different proportion together with a small percentage of copper. bismuth ~occurrence.~ bismuth is usually found in the uncombined form in nature. it also occurs as oxide and sulphide. most of the bismuth of commerce comes from saxony, and from mexico and colorado, but it is not an abundant element. ~preparation.~ it is prepared by merely heating the ore containing the native bismuth and allowing the melted metal to run out into suitable vessels. other ores are converted into oxides and reduced by heating with carbon. ~physical properties.~ bismuth is a heavy, crystalline, brittle metal nearly the color of silver, but with a slightly rosy tint which distinguishes it from other metals. it melts at a low temperature ( °) and has a density of . . it is not acted upon by the air at ordinary temperatures. ~chemical properties.~ when heated with the blowpipe on charcoal, bismuth gives a coating of the oxide bi_{ }o_{ }. this has a yellowish-brown color which easily distinguishes it from the oxides formed by other metals. it combines very readily with the halogen elements, powdered bismuth burning readily in chlorine. it is not very easily acted upon by hydrochloric acid, but nitric and sulphuric acids act upon it in the same way that they do upon copper. ~uses.~ bismuth finds its chief use as a constituent of alloys, particularly in those of low melting point. some of these melt in hot water. for example, wood's metal, consisting of bismuth, lead, tin, and cadmium, melts at . °. ~compounds of bismuth.~ unlike the other elements of this group, bismuth has almost no acid properties. its chief oxide, bi_{ }o_{ }, is basic in its properties. it dissolves in strong acids and forms salts of bismuth: bi_{ }o_{ } + hcl = bicl_{ } + h_{ }o, bi_{ }o_{ } + hno_{ } = bi(no_{ })_{ } + h_{ }o. the nitrate and chloride of bismuth can be obtained as well-formed colorless crystals. when treated with water the salts are decomposed in the manner explained in the following paragraph. hydrolysis many salts such as those of antimony and bismuth form solutions which are somewhat acid in reaction, and must therefore contain hydrogen ions. this is accounted for by the same principle suggested to explain the fact that solutions of potassium cyanide are alkaline in reaction (p. ). water forms an appreciable number of hydrogen and hydroxyl ions, and very weak bases such as bismuth hydroxide are dissociated to but a very slight extent. when bi^{+++} ions from bismuth chloride, which dissociates very readily, are brought in contact with the oh^{-} ions from water, the two come to the equilibrium expressed in the equation bi^{+++} + oh^{-} <--> bi(oh)_{ }. for every hydroxyl ion removed from the solution in this way a hydrogen ion is left free, and the solution becomes acid in reaction. reactions of this kind and that described under potassium cyanide are called _hydrolysis_. definition: _hydrolysis is the action of water upon a salt to form an acid and a base, one of which is very slightly dissociated._ ~conditions favoring hydrolysis.~ while hydrolysis is primarily due to the slight extent to which either the acid or the base formed is dissociated, several other factors have an influence upon the extent to which it will take place. . _influence of mass._ since hydrolysis is a reversible reaction, the relative masses of the reacting substances influence the point at which equilibrium will be reached. in the equilibrium bicl_{ } + h_{ }o <--> bi(oh)_{ } + hcl the addition of more water will result in the formation of more bismuth hydroxide and hydrochloric acid. the addition of more hydrochloric acid will convert some of the bismuth hydroxide into bismuth chloride. . _formation of insoluble substances._ when one of the products of hydrolysis is nearly insoluble in water the solution will become saturated with it as soon as a very little has been formed. all in excess of this will precipitate, and the reaction will go on until the acid set free increases sufficiently to bring about an equilibrium. thus a considerable amount of bismuth and antimony hydroxides are precipitated when water is added to the chlorides of these elements. the greater the dilution the more hydroxide precipitates. the addition of hydrochloric acid in considerable quantity will, however, redissolve the precipitate. ~partial hydrolysis.~ in many cases the hydrolysis of a salt is only partial, resulting in the formation of basic salts instead of the free base. most of these basic salts are insoluble in water, which accounts for their ready formation. thus bismuth chloride may hydrolyze by successive steps, as shown in the equations bicl_{ } + h_{ }o = bi(oh)cl_{ } + hcl, bicl_{ } + h_{ }o = bi(oh)_{ }cl + hcl, bicl_{ } + h_{ }o = bi(oh)_{ } + hcl. the basic salt so formed may also lose water, as shown in the equation bi(oh)_{ }cl = biocl + h_{ }o. the salt represented in the last equation is sometimes called bismuth oxychloride, or bismuthyl chloride. the corresponding nitrate, biono_{ }, is largely used in medicine under the name of subnitrate of bismuth. in these two compounds the group of atoms, bio, acts as a univalent metallic radical and is called _bismuthyl_. similar basic salts are formed by the hydrolysis of antimony salts. exercises . name all the elements so far studied which possess allotropic forms. . what compounds would you expect phosphorus to form with bromine and iodine? write the equations showing the action of water on these compounds. . in the preparation of phosphine, why is coal gas passed into the flask? what other gases would serve the same purpose? . give the formula for the salt which phosphine forms with hydriodic acid. give the name of the compound. . could phosphoric acid be substituted for sulphuric acid in the preparation of the common acids? . write the equations for the preparation of the three sodium salts of orthophosphoric acid. . why does a solution of disodium hydrogen phosphate react alkaline? . on the supposition that bone ash is pure calcium phosphate, what weight of it would be required in the preparation of kg. of phosphorus? . if arsenopyrite is heated in a current of air, what products are formed? . (a) write equations for the complete combustion of hydrosulphuric acid, methane, and arsine. (b) in what respects are the reactions similar? . write the equations for all the reactions involved in marsh's test for arsenic. . write the names and formulas for the acids of antimony. . write the equations showing the hydrolysis of antimony trichloride; of bismuth nitrate. . in what respects does nitrogen resemble the members of the phosphorus family? chapter xxi silicon, titanium, boron ================================================================= | | | | | | symbol | atomic | density | chlorides | oxides | | weight | | | ____________|________|________|_________|___________|____________ | | | | | silicon | si | . | . | sicl_{ } | sio_{ } titanium | ti | . | . | ticl_{ } | tio_{ } boron | b | . | . | bcl_{ } | b_{ }o_{ } ================================================================= ~general.~ each of the three elements, silicon, titanium, and boron, belongs to a separate periodic family, but they occur near together in the periodic grouping and are very similar in both physical and chemical properties. since the other elements in their families are either so rare that they cannot be studied in detail, or are best understood in connection with other elements, it is convenient to consider these three together at this point. the three elements are very difficult to obtain in the free state, owing to their strong attraction for other elements. they can be prepared by the action of aluminium or magnesium on their oxides and in impure state by reduction with carbon in an electric furnace. they are very hard and melt only at the highest temperatures. at ordinary temperatures they are not attacked by oxygen, but when strongly heated they burn with great brilliancy. silicon and boron are not attacked by acids under ordinary conditions; titanium is easily dissolved by them. silicon ~occurrence.~ next to oxygen silicon is the most abundant element. it does not occur free in nature, but its compounds are very abundant and of the greatest importance. it occurs almost entirely in combination with oxygen as silicon dioxide (sio_{ }), often called silica, or with oxygen and various metals in the form of salts of silicic acids, or silicates. these compounds form a large fraction of the earth's crust. most plants absorb small amounts of silica from the soil, and it is also found in minute quantities in animal organisms. ~preparation.~ the element is most easily prepared by reducing pure powdered quartz with magnesium powder: sio_{ } + mg = mgo + si. ~properties.~ as would be expected from its place in the periodic table, silicon resembles carbon in many respects. it can be obtained in several allotropic forms, corresponding to those of carbon. the crystallized form is very hard, and is inactive toward reagents. the amorphous variety has, in general, properties more similar to charcoal. ~compounds of silicon with hydrogen and the halogens.~ silicon hydride (sih_{ }) corresponds in formula to methane (ch_{ }), but its properties are more like those of phosphine (ph_{ }). it is a very inflammable gas of disagreeable odor, and, as ordinarily prepared, takes fire spontaneously on account of the presence of impurities. silicon combines with the elements of the chlorine family to form such compounds as sicl_{ } and sif_{ }. of these silicon fluoride is the most familiar and interesting. as stated in the discussion of fluorine, it is formed when hydrofluoric acid acts upon silicon dioxide or a silicate. with silica the reaction is thus expressed: sio_{ } + hf = sif_{ } + h_{ }o. it is a very volatile, invisible, poisonous gas. in contact with water it is partially decomposed, as shown in the equation sif_{ } + h_{ }o = hf + si(oh)_{ }. the hydrofluoric acid so formed combines with an additional amount of silicon fluoride, forming the complex fluosilicic acid (h_{ }sif_{ }), thus: hf + sif_{ } = h_{ }sif_{ }. ~silicides.~ as the name indicates, silicides are binary compounds consisting of silicon and some other element. they are very stable at high temperatures, and are usually made by heating the appropriate substances in an electric furnace. the most important one is _carborundum_, which is a silicide of carbon of the formula csi. it is made by heating coke and sand, which is a form of silicon dioxide, in an electric furnace, the process being extensively carried on at niagara falls. the following equation represents the reaction sio_{ } + c = csi + co. the substance so prepared consists of beautiful purplish-black crystals, which are very hard. carborundum is used as an abrasive, that is, as a material for grinding and polishing very hard substances. ferrosilicon is a silicide of iron alloyed with an excess of iron, which finds extensive use in the manufacture of certain kinds of steel. ~manufacture of carborundum.~ the mixture of materials is heated in a large resistance furnace for about thirty-six hours. after the reaction is completed there is left a core of graphite g. surrounding this core is a layer of crystallized carborundum c, about in. thick. outside this is a shell of amorphous carborundum a. the remaining materials m are unchanged and are used for a new charge. [illustration: fig. ] ~silicon dioxide~ (_silica_) (sio_{ }). this substance is found in a great variety of forms in nature, both in the amorphous and in the crystalline condition. in the form of quartz it is found in beautifully formed six-sided prisms, sometimes of great size. when pure it is perfectly transparent and colorless. some colored varieties are given special names, as amethyst (violet), rose quartz (pale pink), smoky or milky quartz (colored and opaque). other varieties of silicon dioxide, some of which also contain water, are chalcedony, onyx, jasper, opal, agate, and flint. sand and sandstone are largely silicon dioxide. ~properties.~ as obtained by chemical processes silicon dioxide is an amorphous white powder. in the crystallized state it is very hard and has a density of . . it is insoluble in water and in most chemical reagents, and requires the hottest oxyhydrogen flame for fusion. acids, excepting hydrofluoric acid, have little action on it, and it requires the most energetic reducing agents to deprive it of oxygen. it is the anhydride of an acid, and consequently it dissolves in fused alkalis to form silicates. being nonvolatile, it will drive out most other anhydrides when heated to a high temperature with their salts, especially when the silicates so formed are fusible. the following equations illustrate this property: na_{ }co_{ } + sio_{ } = na_{ }sio_{ } + co_{ }, na_{ }so_{ } + sio_{ } = na_{ }sio_{ } + so_{ }. ~silicic acids.~ silicon forms two simple acids, orthosilicic acid (h_{ }sio_{ }) and metasilicic acid (h_{ }sio_{ }). orthosilicic acid is formed as a jelly-like mass when orthosilicates are treated with strong acids such as hydrochloric. on attempting to dry this acid it loses water, passing into metasilicic or common silicic acid: h_{ }sio_{ } = h_{ }sio_{ } + h_{ }o. metasilicic acid when heated breaks up into silica and water, thus: h_{ }sio_{ } = h_{ }o + sio_{ }. ~salts of silicic acids,--silicates.~ a number of salts of the orthosilicic and metasilicic acids occur in nature. thus mica (kalsio_{ }) is a salt of orthosilicic acid. ~polysilicic acids.~ silicon has the power to form a great many complex acids which may be regarded as derived from the union of several molecules of the orthosilicic acid, with the loss of water. thus we have h_{ }sio_{ } = h_{ }si_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o. these acids cannot be prepared in the pure state, but their salts form many of the crystalline rocks in nature. feldspar, for example, has the formula kalsi_{ }o_{ }, and is a mixed salt of the acid h_{ }si_{ }o_{ }, whose formation is represented in the equation above. kaolin has the formula al_{ }si_{ }o_{ }· h_{ }o. many other examples will be met in the study of the metals. ~glass.~ when sodium and calcium silicates, together with silicon dioxide, are heated to a very high temperature, the mixture slowly fuses to a transparent liquid, which on cooling passes into the solid called glass. instead of starting with sodium and calcium silicates it is more convenient and economical to heat sodium carbonate (or sulphate) and lime with an excess of clean sand, the silicates being formed during the heating: na_{ }co_{ } + sio_{ } = na_{ }sio_{ } + co_{ }, cao + sio_{ } = casio_{ }. [illustration: fig. ] the mixture is heated below the fusing point for some time, so that the escaping carbon dioxide may not spatter the hot liquid; the heat is then increased and the mixture kept in a state of fusion until all gases formed in the reaction have escaped. _molding and blowing of glass._ the way in which the melted mixture is handled in the glass factory depends upon the character of the article to be made. many articles, such as bottles, are made by blowing the plastic glass into hollow molds of the desired shape. the mold is first opened, as shown in fig. . a lump of plastic glass a on the hollow rod b is lowered into the mold, which is then closed by the handles c. by blowing into the tube the glass is blown into the shape of the mold. the mold is then opened and the bottle lifted out. the neck of the bottle must be cut off at the proper place and the sharp edges rounded off in a flame. other objects, such as lamp chimneys, are made by getting a lump of plastic glass on the end of a hollow iron rod and blowing it into the desired shape without the help of a mold, great skill being required in the manipulation of the glass. window glass is made by blowing large hollow cylinders about ft. long and - / ft. in diameter. these are cut longitudinally, and are then placed in an oven and heated until they soften, when they are flattened out into plates (fig. ). plate glass is cast into flat slabs, which are then ground and polished to perfectly plane surfaces. _varieties of glass._ the ingredients mentioned above make a soft, easily fusible glass. if potassium carbonate is substituted for the sodium carbonate, the glass is much harder and less easily fused; increasing the amount of sand has somewhat the same effect. potassium glass is largely used in making chemical glassware, since it resists the action of reagents better than the softer sodium glass. if lead oxide is substituted for the whole or a part of the lime, the glass is very soft, but has a high index of refraction and is valuable for making optical instruments and artificial jewels. [illustration: fig. ] _coloring of glass._ various substances fused along with the glass mixture give characteristic colors. the amber color of common bottles is due to iron compounds in the glass; in other cases iron colors the glass green. cobalt compounds color it deep blue; those of manganese give it an amethyst tint and uranium compounds impart a peculiar yellowish green color. since iron is nearly always present in the ingredients, glass is usually slightly yellow. this color can be removed by adding the proper amount of manganese dioxide, for the amethyst color of manganese and the yellow of iron together produce white light. _nature of glass._ glass is not a definite chemical compound and its composition varies between wide limits. fused glass is really a solution of various silicates, such as those of calcium and lead, in fused sodium or potassium silicate. a certain amount of silicon dioxide is also present. this solution is then allowed to solidify under such conditions of cooling that the dissolved substances do not separate from the solvent. the compounds which are used to color the glass are sometimes converted into silicates, which then dissolve in the glass, giving it a uniform color. in other cases, as in the milky glasses which resemble porcelain in appearance, the color or opaqueness is due to the finely divided color material evenly distributed throughout the glass, but not dissolved in it. milky glass is made by mixing calcium fluoride, tin oxide, or some other insoluble substance in the melted glass. copper or gold in metallic form scattered through glass gives it shades of red. titanium titanium is a very widely distributed element in nature, being found in almost all soils, in many rocks, and even in plant and animal tissues. it is not very abundant in any one locality, and it possesses little commercial value save in connection with the iron industry. its most common ore is rutile (tio_{ }), which resembles silica in many respects. in both physical and chemical properties titanium resembles silicon, though it is somewhat more metallic in character. this resemblance is most marked in the acids of titanium. it not only forms metatitanic and orthotitanic acids but a great variety of polytitanic acids as well. boron ~occurrence.~ boron is never found free in nature. it occurs as boric acid (h_{ }bo_{ }), and in salts of polyboric acids, which usually have very complicated formulas. ~preparation and properties.~ boron can be prepared from its oxide by reduction with magnesium, exactly as in the case of silicon. it resembles silicon very strikingly in its properties. it occurs in several allotropic forms, is very hard when crystallized, and is rather inactive toward reagents. it forms a hydride, bh_{ }, and combines directly with the elements of the chlorine family. boron fluoride (bf_{ }) is very similar to silicon fluoride in its mode of formation and chemical properties. ~boric oxide~ (b_{ }o_{ }). boron forms one well-known oxide, b_{ }o_{ }, called boric anhydride. it is formed as a glassy mass by heating boric acid to a high temperature. it absorbs water very readily, uniting with it to form boric acid again: b_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o = h_{ }bo_{ }. in this respect it differs from silicon dioxide, which will not combine directly with water. ~boric acid~ (h_{ }bo_{ }). this is found in nature in considerable quantities and forms one of the chief sources of boron compounds. it is found dissolved in the water of hot springs in some localities, particularly in italy. being volatile with steam, the vapor which escapes from these springs has some boric acid in it. it is easily obtained from these sources by condensation and evaporation, the necessary heat being supplied by other hot springs. boric acid crystallizes in pearly flakes, which are greasy to the touch. in the laboratory it is easily prepared by treating a strong, hot solution of borax with sulphuric acid. boric acid being sparingly soluble in water crystallizes out on cooling: na_{ }b_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o + h_{ }so_{ } = na_{ }so_{ } + h_{ }bo_{ }. the substance is a mild antiseptic, and on this account is often used in medicine and as a preservative for canned foods and milk. ~metaboric and polyboric acids.~ when boric acid is gently heated it is converted into metaboric acid (hbo_{ }): h_{ }bo_{ } = hbo_{ } + h_{ }o. on heating metaboric acid to a somewhat higher temperature tetraboric acid (h_{ }b_{ }o_{ }) is formed: hbo_{ } = h_{ }b_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o. many other complex acids of boron are known. ~borax.~ borax is the sodium salt of tetraboric acid, having the formula na_{ }b_{ }o_{ }· h_{ }o. it is found in some arid countries, as southern california and tibet, but is now made commercially from the mineral colemanite, which is the calcium salt of a complex boric acid. when this is treated with a solution of sodium carbonate, calcium carbonate is precipitated and borax crystallizes from the solution. when heated borax at first swells up greatly, owing to the expulsion of the water of crystallization, and then melts to a clear glass. this glass has the property of easily dissolving many metallic oxides, and on this account borax is used as a flux in soldering, for the purpose of removing from the metallic surfaces to be soldered the film of oxide with which they are likely to be covered. these oxides often give a characteristic color to the clear borax glass, and borax beads are therefore often used in testing for the presence of metals, instead of the metaphosphoric acid bead already described. the reason that metallic oxides dissolve in borax is that borax contains an excess of acid anhydride, as can be more easily seen if its formula is written nabo_{ } + b_{ }o_{ }. the metallic oxide combines with this excess of acid anhydride, forming a mixed salt of metaboric acid. borax is extensively used as a constituent of enamels and glazes for both metal ware and pottery. it is also used as a flux in soldering and brazing, and in domestic ways it serves as a mild alkali, as a preservative for meats, and in a great variety of less important applications. exercises . account for the fact that a solution of borax in water is alkaline. . what weight of water of crystallization does kg. of borax contain? . when a concentrated solution of borax acts on silver nitrate a borate of silver is formed. if the solution of borax is dilute, however, an hydroxide of silver forms. account for this difference in behavior. chapter xxii the metals ~the metals.~ the elements which remain to be considered are known collectively as the metals. they are also called the base-forming elements, since their hydroxides are bases. a metal may therefore be defined as an element whose hydroxide is a base. when a base dissolves in water the hydroxyl groups form the anions, while the metallic element forms the cations. from this standpoint a metal can be defined as an element capable of forming simple cations in solution. the distinction between a metal and a non-metal is not a very sharp one, since the hydroxides of a number of elements act as bases under some conditions and as acids under others. we have seen that antimony is an element of this kind. ~occurrence of metals in nature.~ a few of the metals are found in nature in the free state. among these are gold, platinum, and frequently copper. they are usually found combined with other elements in the form of oxides or salts of various acids. silicates, carbonates, sulphides, and sulphates are the most abundant salts. all inorganic substances occurring in nature, whether they contain a metal or not, are called _minerals_. those minerals from which a useful substance can be extracted are called _ores_ of the substance. these two terms are most frequently used in connection with the metals. ~extraction of metals,--metallurgy.~ the process of extracting a metal from its ores is called the metallurgy of the metal. the metallurgy of each metal presents peculiarities of its own, but there are several methods of general application which are very frequently employed. . _reduction of an oxide with carbon._ many of the metals occur in nature in the form of oxides. when these oxides are heated to a high temperature with carbon the oxygen combines with it and the metal is set free. iron, for example, occurs largely in the form of the oxide fe_{ }o_{ }. when this is heated with carbon the reaction expressed in the following equation takes place: fe_{ }o_{ } + c = fe + co. many ores other than oxides may be changed into oxides which can then be reduced by carbon. the conversion of such ores into oxides is generally accomplished by heating, and this process is called _roasting_. many carbonates and hydroxides decompose directly into the oxide on heating. sulphides, on the other hand, must be heated in a current of air, the oxygen of the air entering into the reaction. the following equations will serve to illustrate these changes in the case of the ores of iron: feco_{ } = feo + co_{ }, fe(oh)_{ } = fe_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o, fes_{ } + o = fe_{ }o_{ } + so_{ }. . _reduction of an oxide with aluminium._ not all oxides, however, can be reduced by carbon. in such cases aluminium may be used. thus chromium may be obtained in accordance with the following equation: cr_{ }o_{ } + al = cr + al_{ }o_{ }. this method is a comparatively new one, having been brought into use by the german chemist goldschmidt; hence it is sometimes called the goldschmidt method. . _electrolysis._ in recent years increasing use is being made of the electric current in the preparation of metals. in some cases the separation of the metal from its compounds is accomplished by passing the current through a solution of a suitable salt of the metal, the metal usually being deposited upon the cathode. in other cases the current is passed through a fused salt of the metal, the chloride being best adapted to this purpose. ~electro-chemical industries.~ most of the electro-chemical industries of the country are carried on where water power is abundant, since this furnishes the cheapest means for the generation of electrical energy. niagara falls is the most important locality in this country for such industries, and many different electro-chemical products are manufactured there. some industries depend upon electrolytic processes, while in others the electrical energy is used merely as a source of heat in electric furnaces. ~preparation of compounds of the metals.~ since the compounds of the metals are so numerous and varied in character, there are many ways of preparing them. in many cases the properties of the substance to be prepared, or the material available for its preparation, suggest a rather unusual way. there are, however, a number of general principles which are constantly applied in the preparation of the compounds of the metals, and a clear understanding of them will save much time and effort in remembering the details in any given case. the most important of these general methods for the preparation of compounds are the following: . _by direct union of two elements._ this is usually accomplished by heating the two elements together. thus the sulphides, chlorides, and oxides of a metal can generally be obtained in this way. the following equations serve as examples of this method: fe + s = fes, mg + o = mgo, cu + cl = cucl_{ }. . _by the decomposition of a compound._ this decomposition may be brought about either by heat alone or by the combined action of heat and a reducing agent. thus when the nitrate of a metal is heated the oxide of the metal is usually obtained. copper nitrate, for example, decomposes as follows: cu(no_{ })_{ } = cuo + no_{ } + o. similarly the carbonates of the metals yield oxides, thus: caco_{ } = cao + co_{ }. most of the hydroxides form an oxide and water when heated: al(oh)_{ } = al_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o. when heated with carbon, sulphates are reduced to sulphides, thus: baso_{ } + c = bas + co_{ }. . _methods based on equilibrium in solution._ in the preparation of compounds the first requisite is that the reactions chosen shall be of such a kind as will go on to completion. in the chapter on chemical equilibrium it was shown that reactions in solution may become complete in either of three ways: ( ) a gas may be formed which escapes from solution; ( ) an insoluble solid may be formed which precipitates; ( ) two different ions may combine to form undissociated molecules. by the judicious selection of materials these principles may be applied to the preparation of a great variety of compounds, and illustrations of such methods will very frequently be found in the subsequent pages. . _by fusion methods._ it sometimes happens that substances which are insoluble in water and in acids, and which cannot therefore be brought into double decomposition in the usual way, are soluble in other liquids, and when dissolved in them can be decomposed and converted into other desired compounds. thus barium sulphate is not soluble in water, and sulphuric acid, being less volatile than most other acids, cannot easily be driven out from this salt when brought into contact with melted sodium carbonate, however, it dissolves in it, and since barium carbonate is insoluble in melted sodium carbonate, double decomposition takes place: na_{ }co_{ } + baso_{ } = baco_{ } + na_{ }so_{ }. on dissolving the cooled mixture in water the sodium sulphate formed in the reaction, together with any excess of sodium carbonate which may be present, dissolves. the barium carbonate can then be filtered off and converted into any desired salt by the processes already described. . _by the action of metals on salts of other metals._ when a strip of zinc is placed in a solution of a copper salt the copper is precipitated and an equivalent quantity of zinc passes into solution: zn + cuso_{ } = cu + znso_{ }. in like manner copper will precipitate silver from its salts: cu + ag_{ }so_{ } = ag + cuso_{ }. it is possible to tabulate the metals in such a way that any one of them in the table will precipitate any one following it from its salts. the following is a list of some of the commoner metals arranged in this way: zinc iron tin lead copper bismuth mercury silver gold according to this table copper will precipitate bismuth, mercury, silver, or gold from their salts, and will in turn be precipitated by zinc, iron, tin, or lead. advantage is taken of this principle in the purification of some of the metals, and occasionally in the preparation of metals and their compounds. ~important insoluble compounds.~ since precipitates play so important a part in the reactions which substances undergo, as well as in the preparation of many chemical compounds, it is important to know what substances are insoluble. knowing this, we can in many cases predict reactions under certain conditions, and are assisted in devising ways to prepare desired compounds. while there is no general rule which will enable one to foretell the solubility of any given compound, nevertheless a few general statements can be made which will be of much assistance. . _hydroxides._ all hydroxides are insoluble save those of ammonium, sodium, potassium, calcium, barium, and strontium. . _nitrates._ all nitrates are soluble in water. . _chlorides._ all chlorides are soluble save silver and mercurous chlorides. (lead chloride is but slightly soluble.) . _sulphates._ all sulphates are soluble save those of barium, strontium, and lead. (sulphates of silver and calcium are only moderately soluble.) . _sulphides._ all sulphides are insoluble save those of ammonium, sodium, and potassium. the sulphides of calcium, barium, strontium, and magnesium are insoluble in water, but are changed by hydrolysis into acid sulphides which are soluble. on this account they cannot be prepared by precipitation. . _carbonates, phosphates, and silicates._ all normal carbonates, phosphates, and silicates are insoluble save those of ammonium, sodium and potassium. exercises . write equations representing four different ways for preparing cu(no_{ })_{ }. . write equations representing six different ways for preparing znso_{ }. . write equations for two reactions to illustrate each of the three ways in which reactions in solutions may become complete. . give one or more methods for preparing each of the following compounds: cacl_{ }, pbcl_{ }, baso_{ }, caco_{ }, (nh_{ })_{ }s, ag_{ }s, pbo, cu(oh)_{ } (for solubilities, see last paragraph of chapter). state in each case the general principle involved in the method of preparation chosen. chapter xxiii the alkali metals ================================================================= | | | | | | symbol | atomic | density | melting | first prepared | | weight | | point | __________|________|________|_________|_________|________________ | | | | | lithium | li | . | . | .° | davy sodium | na | . | . | . ° | " potassium | k | . | . | . ° | " rubidium | rb | . | . | . ° | bunsen cæsium | cs | . | . | . ° | " ================================================================= ~the family.~ the metals listed in the above table constitute the even family in group i in the periodic arrangement of the elements, and therefore form a natural family. the name alkali metals is commonly applied to the family for the reason that the hydroxides of the most familiar members of the family, namely sodium and potassium, have long been called alkalis. . _occurrence._ while none of these metals occur free in nature, their compounds are very widely distributed, being especially abundant in sea and mineral waters, in salt beds, and in many rocks. only sodium and potassium occur in abundance, the others being rarely found in any considerable quantity. . _preparation._ the metals are most conveniently prepared by the electrolysis of their fused hydroxides or chlorides, though it is possible to prepare them by reducing their oxides or carbonates with carbon. . _properties._ they are soft, light metals, having low melting points and small densities, as is indicated in the table. their melting points vary inversely with their atomic weights, while their densities (sodium excepted) vary directly with these. the pure metals have a silvery luster but tarnish at once when exposed to the air, owing to the formation of a film of oxide upon the surface of the metal. they are therefore preserved in some liquid, such as coal oil, which contains no oxygen. because of their strong affinity for oxygen they decompose water with great ease, forming hydroxides and liberating hydrogen in accordance with the equation m + h_{ }o = moh + h, where m stands for any one of these metals. these hydroxides are white solids; they are readily soluble in water and possess very strong basic properties. these bases are nearly equal in strength, that is, they all dissociate in water to about the same extent. . _compounds._ the alkali metals almost always act as univalent elements in the formation of compounds, the composition of which can be represented by such formulas as mh, mcl, mno_{ }, m_{ }so_{ }, m_{ }po_{ }. these compounds, when dissolved in water, dissociate in such a way as to form simple, univalent metallic ions which are colorless. with the exception of lithium these metals form very few insoluble compounds, so that it is not often that precipitates containing them are obtained. only sodium and potassium will be studied in detail, since the other metals of the family are of relatively small importance. the compounds of sodium and potassium are so similar in properties that they can be used interchangeably for most purposes. other things being equal, the sodium compounds are prepared in preference to those of potassium, since they are cheaper. when a given sodium compound is deliquescent, or is so soluble that it is difficult to purify, the corresponding potassium compound is prepared in its stead, provided its properties are more desirable in these respects. sodium ~occurrence in nature.~ large deposits of sodium chloride have been found in various parts of the world, and the water of the ocean and of many lakes and springs contains notable quantities of it. the element also occurs as a constituent of many rocks and is therefore present in the soil formed by their disintegration. the mineral cryolite (na_{ }alf_{ }) is an important substance, and the nitrate, carbonate, and borate also occur in nature. ~preparation.~ in sir humphry davy succeeded in preparing very small quantities of metallic sodium by the electrolysis of the fused hydroxide. on account of the cost of electrical energy it was for many years found more economical to prepare it by reducing the carbonate with carbon in accordance with the following equation: na_{ }co_{ } + c = na + co. the cost of generating the electric current has been diminished to such an extent, however, that it is now more economical to prepare sodium by davy's original method, namely, by the electrolysis of the fused hydroxide or chloride. when the chloride is used the process is difficult to manage, owing to the higher temperature required to keep the electrolyte fused, and because of the corroding action of the fused chloride upon the containing vessel. [illustration: sir humphry davy (english) ( - ) isolated sodium, lithium, potassium, barium, strontium, and calcium by means of electrolysis; demonstrated the elementary nature of chlorine; invented the safety lamp; discovered the stupefying effects of nitrous oxide] ~technical preparation.~ the sodium hydroxide is melted in a cylindrical iron vessel (fig. ) through the bottom of which rises the cathode k. the anodes a, several in number, are suspended around the cathode from above. a cylindrical vessel c floats in the fused alkali directly over the cathode, and under this cap the sodium and hydrogen liberated at the cathode collect. the hydrogen escapes by lifting the cover, and the sodium, protected from the air by the hydrogen, is skimmed or drained off from time to time. oxygen is set free upon the anode and escapes into the air through the openings o without coming into contact with the sodium or hydrogen. this process is carried on extensively at niagara falls. [illustration: fig. ] ~properties.~ sodium is a silver-white metal about as heavy as water, and so soft that it can be molded easily by the fingers or pressed into wire. it is very active chemically, combining with most of the non-metallic elements, such as oxygen and chlorine, with great energy. it will often withdraw these elements from combination with other elements, and is thus able to decompose water and the oxides and chlorides of many metals. ~sodium peroxide~ (nao). since sodium is a univalent element we should expect it to form an oxide of the formula na_{ }o. while such an oxide can be prepared, the peroxide (nao) is much better known. it is a yellowish-white powder made by burning sodium in air. its chief use is as an oxidizing agent. when heated with oxidizable substances it gives up a part of its oxygen, as shown in the equation nao = na_{ }o + o. water decomposes it in accordance with the equation nao + h_{ }o = naoh + h_{ }o_{ }. acids act readily upon it, forming a sodium salt and hydrogen peroxide: nao + hcl = nacl + h_{ }o_{ }. in these last two reactions the hydrogen dioxide formed may decompose into water and oxygen if the temperature is allowed to rise: h_{ }o_{ } = h_{ }o + o. ~peroxides.~ it will be remembered that barium dioxide (bao_{ }) yields hydrogen dioxide when treated with acids, and that manganese dioxide gives up oxygen when heated with sulphuric acid. oxides which yield either hydrogen dioxide or oxygen when treated with water or an acid are called peroxides. ~sodium hydroxide~ (_caustic soda_) (naoh). . _preparation._ sodium hydroxide is prepared commercially by several processes. (a) in the older process, still in extensive use, sodium carbonate is treated with calcium hydroxide suspended in water. calcium carbonate is precipitated according to the equation na_{ }co_{ } + ca(oh)_{ } = caco_{ } + naoh. the dilute solution of sodium hydroxide, filtered from the calcium carbonate, is evaporated to a paste and is then poured into molds to solidify. it is sold in the form of slender sticks. (b) the newer methods depend upon the electrolysis of sodium chloride. in the castner process a solution of salt is electrolyzed, the reaction being expressed as follows: nacl + h_{ }o = naoh + h + cl. the chlorine escapes as a gas, and by an ingenious mechanical device the sodium hydroxide is prevented from mixing with the salt in the solution. in the acker process the electrolyte is _fused_ sodium chloride. the chlorine is evolved as a gas at the anode, while the sodium alloys with the melted lead which forms the cathode. when this alloy is treated with water the following reaction takes place: na + h_{ }o = naoh + h. [illustration: fig. ] ~technical process.~ a sketch of an acker furnace is represented in fig. . the furnace is an irregularly shaped cast-iron box, divided into three compartments, a, b, and c. compartment a is lined with magnesia brick. compartments b and c are filled with melted lead, which also covers the bottom of a to a depth of about an inch. above this layer in a is fused salt, into which dip carbon anodes d. the metallic box and melted lead is the cathode. when the furnace is in operation chlorine is evolved at the anodes, and is drawn away through a pipe (not represented) to the bleaching-powder chambers. sodium is set free at the surface of the melted lead in a, and at once alloys with it. through the pipe e a powerful jet of steam is driven through the lead in b upwards into the narrow tube f. this forces the lead alloy up through the tube and over into the chamber g. in this process the steam is decomposed by the sodium in the alloy, forming melted sodium hydroxide and hydrogen. the melted lead and sodium hydroxide separate into two layers in g, and the sodium hydroxide, being on top, overflows into tanks from which it is drawn off and packed in metallic drums. the lead is returned to the other compartments of the furnace by a pipe leading from h to i. compartment c serves merely as a reservoir for excess of melted lead. . _properties._ sodium hydroxide is a white, crystalline, brittle substance which rapidly absorbs water and carbon dioxide from the air. as the name (caustic soda) indicates, it is a very corrosive substance, having a disintegrating action on most animal and vegetable tissues. it is a strong base. it is used in a great many chemical industries, and under the name of lye is employed to a small extent as a cleansing agent for household purposes. ~sodium chloride~ (_common salt_) (nacl). . _preparation._ sodium chloride, or common salt, is very widely distributed in nature. thick strata, evidently deposited at one time by the evaporation of salt water, are found in many places. in the united states the most important localities for salt are new york, michigan, ohio, and kansas. sometimes the salt is mined, especially if it is in the pure form called rock salt. more frequently a strong brine is pumped from deep wells sunk into the salt deposit, and is then evaporated in large pans until the salt crystallizes out. the crystals are in the form of small cubes and contain no water of crystallization; some water is, however, held in cavities in the crystals and causes the salt to decrepitate when heated. . _uses._ since salt is so abundant in nature it forms the starting point in the preparation of all compounds containing either sodium or chlorine. this includes many substances of the highest importance to civilization, such as soap, glass, hydrochloric acid, soda, and bleaching powder. enormous quantities of salt are therefore produced each year. small quantities are essential to the life of man and animals. pure salt does not absorb moisture; the fact that ordinary salt becomes moist in air is not due to a property of the salt, but to impurities commonly occurring in it, especially calcium and magnesium chlorides. ~sodium sulphate~ (_glauber's salt_) (na_{ }so_{ }· h_{ }o). this salt is prepared by the action of sulphuric acid upon sodium chloride, hydrochloric acid being formed at the same time: nacl + h_{ }so_{ } = na_{ }so_{ } + hcl. some sodium sulphate is prepared by the reaction represented in the equation mgso_{ } + nacl = na_{ }so_{ } + mgcl_{ }. the magnesium sulphate required for this reaction is obtained in large quantities in the manufacture of potassium chloride, and being of little value for any other purpose is used in this way. the reaction depends upon the fact that sodium sulphate is the least soluble of any of the four factors in the equation, and therefore crystallizes out when hot, saturated solutions of magnesium sulphate and sodium chloride are mixed together and the resulting mixture cooled. sodium sulphate forms large efflorescent crystals. the salt is extensively used in the manufacture of sodium carbonate and glass. small quantities are used in medicine. ~sodium sulphite~ (na_{ }so_{ }· h_{ }o). sodium sulphite is prepared by the action of sulphur dioxide upon solutions of sodium hydroxide, the reaction being analogous to the action of carbon dioxide upon sodium hydroxide. like the carbonate, the sulphite is readily decomposed by acids: na_{ }so_{ } + hcl = nacl + h_{ }o + so_{ }. because of this reaction sodium sulphite is used as a convenient source of sulphur dioxide. it is also used as a disinfectant and a preservative. ~sodium thiosulphate~ (_hyposulphite of soda or "hypo"_) (na_{ }s_{ }o_{ }· h_{ }o). this salt, commonly called sodium hyposulphite, or merely hypo, is made by boiling a solution of sodium sulphite with sulphur: na_{ }so_{ } + s = na_{ }s_{ }o_{ }. it is used in photography and in the bleaching industry, to absorb the excess of chlorine which is left upon the bleached fabrics. ~thio compounds.~ the prefix "thio" means sulphur. it is used to designate substances which may be regarded as derived from oxygen compounds by replacing the whole or a part of their oxygen with sulphur. the thiosulphates may be regarded as sulphates in which one atom of oxygen has been replaced by an atom of sulphur. this may be seen by comparing the formula na_{ }so_{ } (sodium sulphate) with the formula na_{ }s_{ }o_{ } (sodium thiosulphate). ~sodium carbonate~ (_sal soda_)(na_{ }co_{ }· h_{ }o). there are two different methods now employed in the manufacture of this important substance. . _le blanc process._ this older process involves several distinct reactions, as shown in the following equations. (a) sodium chloride is first converted into sodium sulphate: nacl + h_{ }so_{ } = na_{ }so_{ } + hcl. (b) the sodium sulphate is next reduced to sulphide by heating it with carbon: na_{ }so_{ } + c = na_{ }s + co_{ }. (c) the sodium sulphide is then heated with calcium carbonate, when double decomposition takes place: na_{ }s + caco_{ } = cas + na_{ }co_{ }. ~technical preparation of sodium carbonate.~ in a manufacturing plant the last two reactions take place in one process. sodium sulphate, coal, and powdered limestone are heated together to a rather high temperature. the coal reduces the sulphate to sulphide, which in turn reacts upon the calcium carbonate. some limestone is decomposed by the heat, forming calcium oxide. when treated with water the calcium oxide is changed into hydroxide, and this prevents the water from decomposing the insoluble calcium sulphide. the crude product of the process is a hard black cake called black ash. on digesting this mass with water the sodium carbonate passes into solution. the pure carbonate is obtained by evaporation of this solution, crystallizing from it in crystals of the formula na_{ }co_{ }· h_{ }o. since over % of this salt is water, the crystals are sometimes heated until it is driven off. the product is called calcined soda, and is, of course, more valuable than the crystallized salt. . _solvay process._ this more modern process depends upon the reactions represented in the equations nacl + nh_{ }hco_{ } = nahco_{ } + nh_{ }cl, nahco_{ } = na_{ }co_{ } + h_{ }o + co_{ }. the reason the first reaction takes place is that sodium hydrogen carbonate is sparingly soluble in water, while the other compounds are freely soluble. when strong solutions of sodium chloride and of ammonium hydrogen carbonate are brought together the sparingly soluble sodium hydrogen carbonate is precipitated. this is converted into the normal carbonate by heating, the reaction being represented in the second equation. ~technical preparation.~ in the solvay process a very concentrated solution of salt is first saturated with ammonia gas, and a current of carbon dioxide is then conducted into the solution. in this way ammonium hydrogen carbonate is formed: nh_{ } + h_{ }o + co_{ } = nh_{ }hco_{ }. this enters into double decomposition with the salt, as shown in the first equation under the solvay process. after the sodium hydrogen carbonate has been precipitated the mother liquors containing ammonium chloride are treated with lime: nh_{ }cl + cao = cacl_{ } + nh_{ } + h_{ }o. the lime is obtained by burning limestone: caco_{ } = cao + co_{ }. the ammonia and carbon dioxide evolved in the latter two reactions are used in the preparation of an additional quantity of ammonium hydrogen carbonate. it will thus be seen that there is no loss of ammonia. the only materials permanently used up are calcium carbonate and salt, while the only waste product is calcium chloride. ~historical.~ in former times sodium carbonate was made by burning seaweeds and extracting the carbonate from their ash. on this account the salt was called _soda ash_, and the name is still in common use. during the french revolution this supply was cut off, and in behalf of the french government le blanc made a study of methods of preparing the carbonate directly from salt. as a result he devised the method which bears his name, and which was used exclusively for many years. it has been replaced to a large extent by the solvay process, which has the advantage that the materials used are inexpensive, and that the ammonium hydrogen carbonate used can be regenerated from the products formed in the process. much expense is also saved in fuel, and the sodium hydrogen carbonate, which is the first product of the process, has itself many commercial uses. the le blanc process is still used, however, since the hydrochloric acid generated is of value. ~by-products.~ the substances obtained in a given process, aside from the main product, are called the by-products. the success of many processes depends upon the value of the by-products formed. thus hydrochloric acid, a by-product in the le blanc process, is valuable enough to make the process pay, even though sodium carbonate can be made cheaper in other ways. ~properties of sodium carbonate.~ sodium carbonate forms large crystals of the formula na_{ }co_{ } · h_{ }o. it has a mild alkaline reaction and is used for laundry purposes under the name of washing soda. mere mention of the fact that it is used in the manufacture of glass, soap, and many chemical reagents will indicate its importance in the industries. it is one of the few soluble carbonates. ~sodium hydrogen carbonate~ (_bicarbonate of soda_) (nahco_{ }). this salt, commonly called bicarbonate of soda, or baking soda, is made by the solvay process, as explained above, or by passing carbon dioxide into strong solutions of sodium carbonate: na_{ }co_{ } + h_{ }o + co_{ } = nahco_{ }. the bicarbonate, being sparingly soluble, crystallizes out. a mixture of the bicarbonate with some substance (the compound known as cream of tartar is generally used) which slowly reacts with it, liberating carbon dioxide, is used largely in baking. the carbon dioxide generated forces its way through the dough, thus making it porous and light. ~sodium nitrate~ (_chili saltpeter_) (nano_{ }). this substance is found in nature in arid regions in a number of places, where it has been formed apparently by the decay of organic substances in the presence of air and sodium salts. the largest deposits are in chili, and most of the nitrate of commerce comes from that country. smaller deposits occur in california and nevada. the commercial salt is prepared by dissolving the crude nitrate in water, allowing the insoluble earthy materials to settle, and evaporating the clear solution so obtained to crystallization. the soluble impurities remain for the most part in the mother liquors. since this salt is the only nitrate found extensively in nature, it is the material from which other nitrates as well as nitric acid are prepared. it is used in enormous quantities in the manufacture of sulphuric acid and potassium nitrate, and as a fertilizer. ~sodium phosphate~ (na_{ }hpo_{ }· h_{ }o). since phosphoric acid has three replaceable hydrogen atoms, three sodium phosphates are possible,--two acid salts and one normal. all three can be made without difficulty, but disodium phosphate is the only one which is largely used, and is the salt which is commonly called sodium phosphate. it is made by the action of phosphoric acid on sodium carbonate: na_{ }co_{ } + h_{ }po_{ } = na_{ }hpo_{ } + co_{ } + h_{ }o. it is interesting as being one of the few phosphates which are soluble in water, and is the salt commonly used when a soluble phosphate is needed. ~normal sodium phosphate~ (na_{ }po_{ }). although this is a normal salt its solution has a strongly alkaline reaction. this is due to the fact that the salt hydrolyzes in solution into sodium hydroxide and disodium phosphate, as represented in the equation na_{ }po_{ } + h_{ }o = na_{ }hpo_{ } + naoh. sodium hydroxide is strongly alkaline, while disodium phosphate is nearly neutral in reaction. the solution as a whole is therefore alkaline. the salt is prepared by adding a large excess of sodium hydroxide to a solution of disodium phosphate and evaporating to crystallization. the excess of the sodium hydroxide reverses the reaction of hydrolysis and the normal salt crystallizes out. ~sodium tetraborate ~(_borax_) (na_{ }b_{ }o_{ }· h_{ }o). the properties of this important compound have been discussed under the head of boron. potassium ~occurrence in nature.~ potassium is a constituent of many common rocks and minerals, and is therefore a rather abundant element, though not so abundant as sodium. feldspar, which occurs both by itself and as a constituent of granite, contains considerable potassium. the element is a constituent of all clay and of mica and also occurs in very large deposits at stassfurt, germany, in the form of the chloride and sulphate, associated with compounds of sodium and magnesium. in small quantities it is found as nitrate and in many other forms. the natural decomposition of rocks containing potassium gives rise to various compounds of the element in all fertile soils. its soluble compounds are absorbed by growing plants and built up into complex vegetable substances; when these are burned the potassium remains in the ash in the form of the carbonate. crude carbonate obtained from wood ashes was formerly the chief source of potassium compounds; they are now mostly prepared from the salts of the stassfurt deposits. ~stassfurt salts.~ these salts form very extensive deposits in middle and north germany, the most noted locality for working them being at stassfurt. the deposits are very thick and rest upon an enormous layer of common salt. they are in the form of a series of strata, each consisting largely of a single mineral salt. a cross section of these deposits is shown in fig. . while these strata are salts from a chemical standpoint, they are as solid and hard as many kinds of stone, and are mined as stone or coal would be. since the strata differ in general appearance, each can be mined separately, and the various minerals can be worked up by methods adapted to each particular case. the chief minerals of commercial importance in these deposits are the following: sylvine kcl. anhydrite caso_{ }. carnallite kcl·mgcl_{ }· h_{ }o. kainite k_{ }so_{ }·mgso_{ }·mgcl_{ }· h_{ }o. polyhalite k_{ }so_{ }·mgso_{ }· caso_{ }· h_{ }o. kieserite mgso_{ }·h_{ }o. schönite k_{ }so_{ }·mgso_{ }· h_{ }o. ~preparation and properties.~ the metal is prepared by the same method used in the preparation of sodium. in most respects it is very similar to sodium, the chief difference being that it is even more energetic in its action upon other substances. the freshly cut, bright surface instantly becomes dim through oxidation by the air. it decomposes water very vigorously, the heat of reaction being sufficient to ignite the hydrogen evolved. it is somewhat lighter than sodium and is preserved under gasoline. [illustration: fig. ] ~potassium hydroxide~ (_caustic potash_) (koh). potassium hydroxide is prepared by methods exactly similar to those used in the preparation of sodium hydroxide, which compound it closely resembles in both physical and chemical properties. it is not used to any very great extent, being replaced by the cheaper sodium hydroxide. ~action of the halogen elements on potassium hydroxide.~ when any one of the three halogen elements--chlorine, bromine, and iodine--is added to a solution of potassium hydroxide a reaction takes place, the nature of which depends upon the conditions of the experiment. thus, when chlorine is passed into a cold dilute solution of potassium hydroxide the reaction expressed by the following equation takes place: ( ) koh + cl = kcl + kclo + h_{ }o. if the solution of hydroxide is concentrated and hot, on the other hand, the potassium hypochlorite formed according to equation ( ) breaks down as fast as formed: ( ) kclo = kclo_{ } + kcl. equation ( ), after being multiplied by , may be combined with equation ( ), giving the following: ( ) koh + cl = kcl + kclo_{ } + h_{ }o. this represents in a single equation the action of chlorine on hot, concentrated solutions of potassium hydroxide. by means of these reactions one can prepare potassium chloride, potassium hypochlorite, and potassium chlorate. by substituting bromine or iodine for chlorine the corresponding compounds of these elements are obtained. some of these compounds can be obtained in cheaper ways. if the halogen element is added to a solution of sodium hydroxide or calcium hydroxide, the reaction which takes place is exactly similar to that which takes place with potassium hydroxide. it is possible, therefore, to prepare in this way the sodium and calcium compounds corresponding to the potassium compounds given above. ~potassium chloride~ (kcl). this salt occurs in nature in sea water, in the mineral sylvine, and, combined with magnesium chloride, as carnallite (kcl·mgcl_{ }· h_{ }o). it is prepared from carnallite by saturating boiling water with the mineral and allowing the solution to cool. the mineral decomposes while in solution, and the potassium chloride crystallizes out on cooling, while the very soluble magnesium chloride remains in solution. the salt is very similar to sodium chloride both in physical and chemical properties. it is used in the preparation of nearly all other potassium salts, and, together with potassium sulphate, is used as a fertilizer. ~potassium bromide~ (kbr). when bromine is added to a hot concentrated solution of potassium hydroxide there is formed a mixture of potassium bromide and potassium bromate in accordance with the reactions already discussed. there is no special use for the bromate, so the solution is evaporated to dryness, and the residue, consisting of a mixture of the bromate and bromide, is strongly heated. this changes the bromate to bromide, as follows: kbro_{ } = kbr + o. the bromide is then crystallized from water, forming large colorless crystals. it is used in medicine and in photography. ~potassium iodide~ (ki). potassium iodide may be made by exactly the same method as has just been described for the bromide, substituting iodine for bromine. it is more frequently made as follows. iron filings are treated with iodine, forming the compound fe_{ }i_{ }; on boiling this substance with potassium carbonate the reaction represented in the following equation occurs: fe_{ }i_{ } + k_{ }co_{ } = fe_{ }o_{ } + ki + co_{ }. potassium iodide finds its chief use in medicine. ~potassium chlorate~ (kclo_{ }). this salt, as has just been explained, can be made by the action of chlorine on strong potassium hydroxide solutions. the chief use of potassium chlorate is as an oxidizing agent in the manufacture of matches, fireworks, and explosives; it is also used in the preparation of oxygen and in medicine. ~commercial preparation.~ by referring to the reaction between chlorine and hot concentrated solutions of potassium hydroxide, it will be seen that only one molecule of potassium chlorate is formed from six molecules of potassium hydroxide. partly because of this poor yield and partly because the potassium hydroxide is rather expensive, this process is not an economical one for the preparation of potassium chlorate. the commercial method is the following. chlorine is passed into hot solutions of calcium hydroxide, a compound which is very cheap. the resulting calcium chloride and chlorate are both very soluble. to the solution of these salts potassium chloride is added, and as the solution cools the sparingly soluble potassium chlorate crystallizes out: ca(clo_{ })_{ } + kcl = kclo_{ } + cacl_{ }. electro-chemical processes are also used. ~potassium nitrate~ (_saltpeter_) (kno_{ }). this salt was formerly made by allowing animal refuse to decompose in the open air in the presence of wood ashes or earthy materials containing potassium. under these conditions the nitrogen in the organic matter is in part converted into potassium nitrate, which was obtained by extracting the mass with water and evaporating to crystallization. this crude and slow process is now almost entirely replaced by a manufacturing process in which the potassium salt is made from chili saltpeter: nano_{ } + kcl = nacl + kno_{ }. this process has been made possible by the discovery of the chili niter beds and the potassium chloride of the stassfurt deposits. the reaction depends for its success upon the apparently insignificant fact that sodium chloride is almost equally soluble in cold and hot water. all four factors in the equation are rather soluble in cold water, but in hot water sodium chloride is far less soluble than the other three. when hot saturated solutions of sodium nitrate and potassium chloride are brought together, sodium chloride precipitates and can be filtered off, leaving potassium nitrate in solution, together with some sodium chloride. on cooling, potassium nitrate crystallizes out, leaving small amounts of the other salts in solution. potassium nitrate is a colorless salt which forms very large crystals. it is stable in the air, and when heated is a good oxidizing agent, giving up oxygen quite readily. its chief use is in the manufacture of gunpowder. ~gunpowder.~ the object sought for in the preparation of gunpowder is to secure a solid substance which will remain unchanged under ordinary conditions, but which will explode readily when ignited, evolving a large volume of gas. when a mixture of carbon and potassium nitrate is ignited a great deal of gas is formed, as will be seen from the equation kno_{ } + c = co_{ } + co + n_{ } + k_{ }co_{ }. by adding sulphur to the mixture the volume of gas formed in the explosion is considerably increased: kno_{ } + c + s = co_{ } + n_{ } + k_{ }s. gunpowder is simply a mechanical mixture of these three substances in the proportion required for the above reaction. while the equation represents the principal reaction, other reactions also take place. the gases formed in the explosion, when measured under standard conditions, occupy about two hundred and eighty times the volume of the original powder. potassium sulphide (k_{ }s) is a solid substance, and it is largely due to it that gunpowder gives off smoke and soot when it explodes. smokeless powder consists of organic substances which, on explosion, give only colorless gases, and hence produce no smoke. sodium nitrate is cheaper than potassium nitrate, but it is not adapted to the manufacture of the best grades of powder, since it is somewhat deliquescent and does not give up its oxygen so readily as does potassium nitrate. it is used, however, in the cheaper grades of powder, such as are employed for blasting. ~potassium cyanide~ (kcn). when animal matter containing nitrogen is heated with iron and potassium carbonate, complicated changes occur which result in the formation of a substance commonly called yellow prussiate of potash, which has the formula k_{ }fec_{ }n_{ }. when this substance is heated with potassium, potassium cyanide is formed: k_{ }fec_{ }n_{ } + k = kcn + fe. since sodium is much cheaper than potassium it is often used in place of it: k_{ }fec_{ }n_{ } + na = kcn + nacn + fe. the mixture of cyanides so resulting serves most of the purposes of the pure salt. it is used very extensively in several metallurgical processes, particularly in the extraction of gold. potassium cyanide is a white solid characterized by its poisonous properties, and must be used with extreme caution. ~potassium carbonate~ (_potash_) (k_{ }co_{ }). this compound occurs in wood ashes in small quantities. it cannot be prepared by the solvay process, since the acid carbonate is quite soluble in water, but is made by the le blanc process. its chief use is in the manufacture of other potassium salts. ~other salts of potassium.~ among the other salts of potassium frequently met with are the sulphate (k_{ }so_{ }), the acid carbonate (khco_{ }), the acid sulphate (khso_{ }), and the acid sulphite (khso_{ }). these are all white solids. lithium, rubidium, cÆsium of the three remaining elements of the family--lithium, rubidium, and cæsium--lithium is by far the most common, the other two being very rare. lithium chloride and carbonate are not infrequently found in natural mineral waters, and as these substances are supposed to increase the medicinal value of the water, they are very often added to artificial mineral waters in small quantities. compounds of ammonium ~general.~ as explained in a previous chapter, when ammonia is passed into water the two compounds combine to form the base nh_{ }oh, known as ammonium hydroxide. when this base is neutralized with acids there are formed the corresponding salts, known as the ammonium salts. since the ammonium group is univalent, ammonium salts resemble those of the alkali metals in formulas; they also resemble the latter salts very much in their chemical properties, and may be conveniently described in connection with them. among the ammonium salts the chloride, sulphate, carbonate, and sulphide are the most familiar. ~ammonium chloride~ (_sal ammoniac_) (nh_{ }cl). this substance is obtained by neutralizing ammonium hydroxide with hydrochloric acid. it is a colorless substance crystallizing in fine needles, and, like most ammonium salts, is very soluble in water. when placed in a tube and heated strongly it decomposes into hydrochloric acid and ammonia. when these gases reach a cooler portion of the tube they at once recombine, and the resulting ammonium chloride is deposited on the sides of the tube. in this way the salt can be separated from nonvolatile impurities. ammonium chloride is sometimes used in preparation of ammonia; it is also used in making dry batteries and in the laboratory as a chemical reagent. ~ammonium sulphate~ ((nh_{ })_{ }so_{ }). this salt resembles the chloride very closely, and, being cheaper, is used in place of it when possible. it is used in large quantity as a fertilizer, the nitrogen which it contains being a very valuable food for plants. ~ammonium carbonate~ ((nh_{ })_{ }co_{ }). this salt, as well as the acid carbonate (nh_{ }hco_{ }), is used as a chemical reagent. they are colorless solids, freely soluble in water. the normal carbonate is made by heating ammonium chloride with powdered limestone (calcium carbonate), the ammonium carbonate being obtained as a sublimate in compact hard masses: nh_{ }cl + caco_{ } = (nh_{ })_{ }co_{ } + cacl_{ }. the salt always smells of ammonia, since it slowly decomposes, as shown in the equation (nh_{ })_{ }co_{ } = nh_{ }hco_{ } + nh_{ }. the acid carbonate, or bicarbonate, is prepared by saturating a solution of ammonium hydroxide with carbon dioxide: nh_{ }oh + co_{ } = nh_{ }hco_{ }. it is a well-crystallized stable substance. ~ammonium sulphide~ ((nh_{ })_{ }s). ammonium sulphide is prepared by the action of hydrosulphuric acid upon ammonium hydroxide: nh_{ }oh + h_{ }s = (nh_{ })_{ }s + h_{ }o. if the action is allowed to continue until no more hydrosulphuric acid is absorbed, the product is the acid sulphide, sometimes called the hydrosulphide: nh_{ }oh + h_{ }s = nh_{ }hs + h_{ }o. if equal amounts of ammonium hydroxide and ammonium acid sulphide are brought together, the normal sulphide is formed: nh_{ }oh + nh_{ }hs = (nh_{ })_{ }s + h_{ }o it has been obtained in the solid state, but only with great difficulty. as used in the laboratory it is always in the form of a solution. it is much used in the process of chemical analysis because it is a soluble sulphide and easily prepared. on exposure to the air ammonium sulphide slowly decomposes, being converted into ammonia, water, and sulphur: (nh_{ })_{ }s + o = nh_{ } + h_{ }o + s. as fast as the sulphur is liberated it combines with the unchanged sulphide to form several different ammonium sulphides in which there are from two to five sulphur atoms in the molecule, thus: (nh_{ })_{ }s_{ }, (nh_{ })_{ }s_{ }, (nh_{ })_{ }s_{ }. these sulphides in turn decompose by further action of oxygen, so that the final products of the reaction are those given in the equation. a solution of these compounds is yellow and is sometimes called _yellow ammonium sulphide_. flame reaction--spectroscope when compounds of either sodium or potassium are brought into the non-luminous flame of a bunsen burner the flame becomes colored. sodium compounds color it intensely yellow, while those of potassium color it pale violet. when only one of these elements is present it is easy to identify it by this simple test, but when both are present the intense color of the sodium flame entirely conceals the pale tint characteristic of potassium compounds. it is possible to detect the potassium flame in such cases, however, in the following way. when light is allowed to shine through a very small hole or slit in some kind of a screen, such as a piece of metal, upon a triangular prism of glass, the light is bent or refracted out of its course instead of passing straight through the glass. it thus comes out of the prism at some angle to the line at which it entered. yellow light is bent more than red, and violet more than yellow. when light made up of the yellow of sodium and the violet of potassium shines through a slit upon such a prism, the yellow and the violet lights come out at somewhat different angles, and so two colored lines of light--a yellow line and a violet line--are seen on looking into the prism in the proper direction. the instrument used for separating the rays of light in this way is called a _spectroscope_ (fig. ). the material to be tested is placed on a platinum wire and held in the colorless bunsen flame. the resulting light passes through the slit in the end of tube b, and then through b to the prism. the resulting lines of light are seen by looking into the tube a, which contains a magnifying lens. most elements give more than one image of the slit, each having a different color, and the series of colored lines due to an element is called its spectrum. [illustration: fig. ] the spectra of the known elements have been carefully studied, and any element which imparts a characteristic color to a flame, or has a spectrum of its own, can be identified even when other elements are present. through the spectroscopic examination of certain minerals a number of elements have been discovered by the observation of lines which did not belong to any known element. a study of the substance then brought to light the new element. rubidium and cæsium were discovered in this way, rubidium having bright red lines and cæsium a very intense blue line. lithium colors the flame deep red, and has a bright red line in its spectrum. exercises . what is an alkali? can a metal itself be an alkali? . write equations showing how the following changes may be brought about, giving the general principle involved in each change: nacl --> na_{ }so_{ }, na_{ }so_{ } --> nacl, nacl --> nabr, na_{ }so_{ } --> nano_{ }, nano_{ } --> nahco_{ }. . what carbonates are soluble? . state the conditions under which the reaction represented by the following equation can be made to go in either direction: na_{ }co_{ } + h_{ }o + co_{ } <--> nahco_{ }. . account for the fact that solutions of sodium carbonate and potassium carbonate are alkaline. . what non-metallic element is obtained from the deposits of chili saltpeter? . supposing concentrated hydrochloric acid (den. = . ) to be worth six cents a pound, what is the value of the acid generated in the preparation of ton of sodium carbonate by the le blanc process? . what weight of sodium carbonate crystals will kg. of the anhydrous salt yield? . write equations for the preparation of potassium hydroxide by three different methods. . what would take place if a bit of potassium hydroxide were left exposed to the air? . write the equations for the reactions between sodium hydroxide and bromine; between potassium hydroxide and iodine. . write equations for the preparation of potassium sulphate; of potassium acid carbonate. . what weight of carnallite would be necessary in the preparation of ton of potassium carbonate? . write the equations showing how ammonium chloride, ammonium sulphate, ammonium carbonate, and ammonium nitrate may be prepared from ammonium hydroxide. . write an equation to represent the reaction involved in the preparation of ammonia from ammonium chloride. . what substances already studied are prepared from the following compounds? ammonium chloride; ammonium nitrate; ammonium nitrite; sodium nitrate; sodium chloride. . how could you prove that the water in crystals of common salt is not water of crystallization? . how could you distinguish between potassium chloride and potassium iodide? between sodium chloride and ammonium chloride? between sodium nitrate and potassium nitrate? [illustration: robert wilhelm bunsen (german) ( - ) invented many lecture-room and laboratory appliances (bunsen burner); invented the spectroscope and with it discovered rubidium and cæsium; greatly perfected methods of electrolysis, inventing a new battery; made many investigations among metallic and organic substances] chapter xxiv the alkaline-earth family =========================================================================== | | | | | | | | | milligrams sol- | | | | | uble in l. | | | | | of water at ° | | symbol | atomic | density |__________________| carbonate | | weight | | | | decomposes | | | | sulphate| hydrox-| | | | | | ide | __________|________|________|_________|_________|________|_________________ | | | | | | calcium | ca | . | . | . | . | at dull red heat strontium | sr | . | . | . | . | at white heat barium | ba | . | . | . | . | scarcely at all =========================================================================== ~the family.~ the alkaline-earth family consists of the very abundant element calcium and the much rarer elements strontium and barium. they are called the alkaline-earth metals because their properties are between those of the alkali metals and the earth metals. the earth metals will be discussed in a later chapter. the family is also frequently called the calcium family. . _occurrence._ these elements do not occur free in nature. their most abundant compounds are the carbonates and sulphates; calcium also occurs in large quantities as the phosphate and silicate. . _preparation._ the metals were first prepared by davy in by electrolysis. this method has again come into use in recent years. strontium and barium have as yet been obtained only in small quantities and in the impure state, and many of their physical properties, such as their densities and melting points, are therefore imperfectly known. . _properties._ the three metals resemble each other very closely. they are silvery-white in color and are about as hard as lead. their densities increase with their atomic weights, as is shown in the table on opposite page. like the alkali metals they have a strong affinity for oxygen, tarnishing in the air through oxidation. they decompose water at ordinary temperatures, forming hydroxides and liberating hydrogen. when ignited in the air they burn with brilliancy, forming oxides of the general formula mo. these oxides readily combine with water, according to the equation mo + h_{ }o = m(oh)_{ }. each of the elements has a characteristic spectrum, and the presence of the metals can easily be detected by the spectroscope. . _compounds._ the elements are divalent in almost all of their compounds, and these compounds in solution give simple, divalent, colorless ions. the corresponding salts of the three elements are very similar to each other and show a regular variation in properties in passing from calcium to strontium and from strontium to barium. this is seen in the solubility of the sulphate and hydroxide, and in the ease of decomposition of the carbonates, as given in the table. unlike the alkali metals, their normal carbonates and phosphates are insoluble in water. calcium ~occurrence.~ the compounds of calcium are very abundant in nature, so that the total amount of calcium in the earth's crust is very large. a great many different compounds containing the clement are known, the most important of which are the following: calcite (marble) caco_{ }. phosphorite ca_{ }(po_{ })_{ }. fluorspar caf_{ }. wollastonite casio_{ }. gypsum caso_{ }· h_{ }o. anhydrite caso_{ }. ~preparation.~ calcium is now prepared by the electrolysis of the melted chloride, the metal depositing in solid condition on the cathode. it is a gray metal, considerably heavier and harder than sodium. it acts upon water, forming calcium hydroxide and hydrogen, but the action does not evolve sufficient heat to melt the metal. it promises to become a useful substance, though no commercial applications for it have as yet been found. ~calcium oxide~ (_lime, quicklime_) (cao). lime is prepared by strongly heating calcium carbonate (limestone) in large furnaces called kilns: caco_{ } = cao + co_{ }. when pure, lime is a white amorphous substance. heated intensely, as in the oxyhydrogen flame, it gives a brilliant light called the lime light. although it is a very difficultly fusible substance, yet in the electric furnace it can be made to melt and even boil. water acts upon lime with the evolution of a great deal of heat,--hence the name quicklime, or live lime,--the process being called slaking. the equation is cao + h_{ }o = ca(oh)_{ }. lime readily absorbs moisture from the air, and is used to dry moist gases, especially ammonia, which cannot be dried by the usual desiccating agents. it also absorbs carbon dioxide, forming the carbonate cao + co_{ } = caco_{ }. lime exposed to air is therefore gradually converted into hydroxide and carbonate, and will no longer slake with water. it is then said to be air-slaked. ~limekilns.~ the older kiln, still in common use, consists of a large cylindrical stack in which the limestone is loosely packed. a fire is built at the base of the stack, and when the burning is complete it is allowed to die out and the lime is removed from the kiln. the newer kilns are constructed as shown in fig. . a number of fire boxes are built around the lower part of the kiln, one of which is shown at b. the fire is built on the grate f and the hot products of combustion are drawn up through the stack, decomposing the limestone. the kiln is charged at c, and sometimes fuel is added with the limestone to cause combustion throughout the contents of the kiln. the burned lime is raked out through openings in the bottom of the stack, one of which is shown at _d._ the advantage of this kind of a kiln over the older form is that the process is continuous, limestone being charged in at the top as fast as the lime is removed at the bottom. [illustration: fig. ] ~calcium hydroxide ~ (_slaked lime_) (ca(oh)_{ }). pure calcium hydroxide is a light white powder. it is sparingly soluble in water, forming a solution called _limewater_, which is often used in medicine as a mild alkali. chemically, calcium hydroxide is a moderately strong base, though not so strong as sodium hydroxide. owing to its cheapness it is much used in the industries whenever an alkali is desired. a number of its uses have already been mentioned. it is used in the preparation of ammonia, bleaching powder, and potassium hydroxide. it is also used to remove carbon dioxide and sulphur compounds from coal gas, to remove the hair from hides in the tanneries (this recalls the caustic or corrosive properties of sodium hydroxide), and for making mortar. ~mortar~ is a mixture of calcium hydroxide and sand. when it is exposed to the air or spread upon porous materials moisture is removed from it partly by absorption in the porous materials and partly by evaporation, and the mortar becomes firm, or _sets_. at the same time carbon dioxide is slowly absorbed from the air, forming hard calcium carbonate: ca(oh)_{ } + co_{ } = caco_{ } + h_{ }o. by this combined action the mortar becomes very hard and adheres firmly to the surface upon which it is spread. the sand serves to give body to the mortar and makes it porous, so that the change into carbonate can take place throughout the mass. it also prevents too much shrinkage. ~cement.~ when limestone to which clay and sand have been added in certain proportions is burned until it is partly fused (some natural marl is already of about the right composition), and the clinker so produced is ground to powder, the product is called cement. when this material is moistened it sets to a hard stone-like mass which retains its hardness even when exposed to the continued action of water. it can be used for under-water work, such as bridge piers, where mortar would quickly soften. several varieties of cement are made, the best known of which is portland cement. ~growing importance of cement.~ cement is rapidly coming into use for a great variety of purposes. it is often used in place of mortar in the construction of brick buildings. mixed with crushed stone and sand it forms concrete which is used in foundation work. it is also used in making artificial stone, terra-cotta trimmings for buildings, artificial stone walks and floors, and the like. it is being used more and more for making many articles which were formerly made of wood or stone, and the entire walls of buildings are sometimes made of cement blocks or of concrete. ~calcium carbonate~ (caco_{ }). this substance is found in a great many natural forms to which various names have been given. they may be classified under three heads: . _amorphous carbonate._ this includes those forms which are not markedly crystalline. limestone is the most familiar of these and is a grayish rock usually found in hard stratified masses. whole mountain ranges are sometimes made up of this material. it is always impure, usually containing magnesium carbonate, clay, silica, iron and aluminium compounds, and frequently fossil remains. marl is a mixture of limestone and clay. pearls, chalk, coral, and shells are largely calcium carbonate. . _hexagonal carbonate._ calcium carbonate crystallizes in the form of rhomb-shaped crystals which belong to the hexagonal system. when very pure and transparent the substance is called iceland spar. calcite is a similar form, but somewhat opaque or clouded. mexican onyx is a massive variety, streaked or banded with colors due to impurities. marble when pure is made up of minute calcite crystals. stalactites and stalagmites are icicle-like forms sometimes found in caves. . _rhombic carbonate._ calcium carbonate sometimes crystallizes in needle-shaped crystals belonging to the rhombic system. this is the unstable form and tends to go over into the other variety. aragonite is the most familiar example of this form. ~preparation and uses of calcium carbonate.~ in the laboratory pure calcium carbonate can be prepared by treating a soluble calcium salt with a soluble carbonate: na_{ }co_{ } + cacl_{ } = caco_{ } + nacl. when prepared in this way it is a soft white powder often called precipitated chalk, and is much used as a polishing powder. it is insoluble in water, but dissolves in water saturated with carbon dioxide, owing to the formation of the acid calcium carbonate which is slightly soluble: caco_{ } + h_{ }co_{ } = ca(hco_{ })_{ }. the natural varieties of calcium carbonate find many uses, such as in the preparation of lime and carbon dioxide; in metallurgical operations, especially in the blast furnaces; in the manufacture of soda, glass, and crayon (which, in addition to chalk, usually contains clay and calcium sulphate); for building stone and ballast for roads. ~calcium chloride~ (cacl_{ }). this salt occurs in considerable quantity in sea water. it is obtained as a by-product in many technical processes, as in the solvay soda process. when crystallized from its saturated solutions it forms colorless needles of the composition cacl_{ }· h_{ }o. by evaporating a solution to dryness and heating to a moderate temperature calcium chloride is obtained anhydrous as a white porous mass. in this condition it absorbs water with great energy and is a valuable drying agent. ~bleaching powder~ (caocl_{ }). when chlorine acts upon a solution of calcium hydroxide the reaction is similar to that which occurs between chlorine and potassium hydroxide: ca(oh)_{ } + cl = cacl_{ } + ca(clo)_{ } + h_{ }o. if, however, chlorine is conducted over calcium hydroxide in the form of a dry powder, it is absorbed and a substance is formed which appears to have the composition represented in the formula caocl_{ }. this substance is called bleaching powder, or hypochlorite of lime. it is probably the calcium salt of both hydrochloric and hypochlorous acids, so that its structure is represented by the formula /clo ca \cl. in solution this substance acts exactly like a mixture of calcium chloride (cacl_{ }) and calcium hypochlorite (ca(clo)_{ }), since it dissociates to form the ions ca^{++}, cl^{-}, and clo^{-}. bleaching powder undergoes a number of reactions which make it an important substance. . when treated with an acid it evolves chlorine: /clo ca + h_{ }so_{ } = caso_{ } + hcl + hclo, \cl hcl + hclo = h_{ }o + cl. this reaction can be employed in the preparation of chlorine, or the nascent chlorine may be used as a bleaching agent. . it is slowly decomposed by the carbon dioxide of the air, yielding calcium carbonate and chlorine: caocl_{ } + co_{ } = caco_{ } + cl. owing to this slow action the substance is a good disinfectant. . when its solution is boiled the substance breaks down into calcium chloride and chlorate: caocl_{ } = cacl_{ } + ca(clo_{ })_{ }. this reaction is used in the preparation of potassium chlorate. ~calcium fluoride~ (_fluorspar_) (caf_{ }). fluorspar has already been mentioned as the chief natural compound of fluorine. it is found in large quantities in a number of localities, and is often crystallized in perfect cubes of a light green or amethyst color. it can be melted easily in a furnace, and is sometimes used in the fused condition in metallurgical operations to protect a metal from the action of the air during its reduction. it is used as the chief source of fluorine compounds, especially hydrofluoric acid. ~calcium sulphate~ (_gypsum_) (caso_{ }· h_{ }o). this abundant substance occurs in very perfectly formed crystals or in massive deposits. it is often found in solution in natural waters and in the sea water. salts deposited from sea water are therefore likely to contain this substance (see stassfurt salts). it is very sparingly soluble in water, and is thrown down as a fine white precipitate when any considerable amounts of a calcium salt and a soluble sulphate (or sulphuric acid) are brought together in solution. its chief use is in the manufacture of plaster of paris and of hollow tiles for fireproof walls. such material is called _gypsite_. it is also used as a fertilizer. calcium sulphate, like the carbonate, occurs in many forms in nature. gypsum is a name given to all common varieties. granular or massive specimens are called alabaster, while all those which are well crystallized are called selenite. satin spar is still another variety often seen in mineral collections. ~plaster of paris.~ when gypsum is heated to about ° it loses a portion of its water of crystallization in accordance with the equation (caso_{ }· h_{ }o) = caso_{ }·h_{ }o + h_{ }o. the product is a fine white powder called _plaster of paris_. on being moistened it again takes up this water, and in so doing first forms a plastic mass, which soon becomes very firm and hard and regains its crystalline structure. these properties make it very valuable as a material for forming casts and stucco work, for cementing glass to metals, and for other similar purposes. if overheated so that all water is driven off, the process of taking up water is so slow that the material is worthless. such material is said to be dead burned. plaster of paris is very extensively used as the finishing coat for plastered walls. ~hard water.~ waters containing compounds of calcium and magnesium in solution are called hard waters because they feel harsh to the touch. the hardness of water may be of two kinds,--( ) temporary hardness and ( ) permanent hardness. . _temporary hardness._ we have seen that when water charged with carbon dioxide comes in contact with limestone a certain amount of the latter dissolves, owing to the formation of the soluble acid carbonate of calcium. the hardness of such waters is said to be temporary, since it may be removed by boiling. the heat changes the acid carbonate into the insoluble normal carbonate which then precipitates, rendering the water soft: ca(hco_{ })_{ } = caco_{ } + h_{ }o + co_{ }. such waters may also be softened by the addition of sufficient lime or calcium hydroxide to convert the acid carbonate of calcium into the normal carbonate. the equation representing the reaction is ca(hco_{ })_{ } + ca(oh)_{ } = caco_{ } + h_{ }o. . _permanent hardness._ the hardness of water may also be due to the presence of calcium and magnesium sulphates or chlorides. boiling the water does not affect these salts; hence such waters are said to have permanent hardness. they may be softened, however, by the addition of sodium carbonate, which precipitates the calcium and magnesium as insoluble carbonates: caso_{ } + na_{ }co_{ } = caco_{ } + na_{ }so_{ }. this process is sometimes called "breaking" the water. ~commercial methods for softening water.~ the average water of a city supply contains not only the acid carbonates of calcium and magnesium but also the sulphates and chlorides of these metals, together with other salts in smaller quantities. such waters are softened on a commercial scale by the addition of the proper quantities of calcium hydroxide and sodium carbonate. the calcium hydroxide is added first to precipitate all the acid carbonates. after a short time the sodium carbonate is added to precipitate the other soluble salts of calcium and magnesium, together with any excess of calcium hydroxide which may have been added. the quantity of calcium hydroxide and sodium carbonate required is calculated from a chemical analysis of the water. it will be noticed that the water softened in this way will contain sodium sulphate and chloride, but the presence of these salts is not objectionable. ~calcium carbide~ (cac_{ }). this substance is made by heating well-dried coke and lime in an electrical furnace. the equation is cao + c = cac_{ } + co. the pure carbide is a colorless, transparent, crystalline substance. in contact with water it is decomposed with the evolution of pure acetylene gas, having a pleasant ethereal odor. the commercial article is a dull gray porous substance which contains many impurities. the acetylene prepared from this substance has a very characteristic odor due to impurities, the chief of these being phosphine. it is used in considerable quantities as a source of acetylene gas for illuminating purposes. ~technical preparation.~ fig. represents a recent type of a carbide furnace. the base of the furnace is provided with a large block of carbon a, which serves as one of the electrodes. the other electrodes b, several in number, are arranged horizontally at some distance above this. a mixture of coal and lime is fed into the furnace through the trap top c, and in the lower part of the furnace this mixture becomes intensely heated, forming liquid carbide. this is drawn off through the taphole d. the carbon monoxide formed in the reaction escapes through the pipes e and is led back into the furnace. the pipes f supply air, so that the monoxide burns as it reënters the furnace and assists in heating the charge. the carbon dioxide so formed, together with the nitrogen entering as air, escape at g. an alternating current is used. [illustration: fig. ] ~calcium phosphate~ (ca_{ }(po_{ })_{ }). this important substance occurs abundantly in nature as a constituent of apatite ( ca_{ }(po_{ })_{ }·caf_{ }), in phosphate rock, and as the chief mineral constituent of bones. bone ash is therefore nearly pure calcium phosphate. it is a white powder, insoluble in water, although it readily dissolves in acids, being decomposed by them and converted into soluble acid phosphates, as explained in connection with the acids of phosphorus. strontium ~occurrence.~ strontium occurs sparingly in nature, usually as strontianite (srco_{ }) and as celestite (srso_{ }). both minerals form beautiful colorless crystals, though celestite is sometimes colored a faint blue. only a few of the compounds of strontium have any commercial applications. ~strontium hydroxide~ (sr(oh)_{ }· h_{ }o). the method of preparation of strontium hydroxide is analogous to that of calcium hydroxide. the substance has the property of forming an insoluble compound with sugar, which can easily be separated again into its constituents. it is therefore sometimes used in the sugar refineries to extract sugar from impure mother liquors from which the sugar will not crystallize. ~strontium nitrate~ (sr(no_{ })_{ }· h_{ }o). this salt is prepared by treating the native carbonate with nitric acid. when ignited with combustible materials it imparts a brilliant crimson color to the flame, and because of this property it is used in the manufacture of red lights. barium barium is somewhat more abundant than strontium, occurring in nature largely as barytes, or heavy spar (baso_{ }), and witherite (baco_{ }). like strontium, it closely resembles calcium both in the properties of the metal and in the compounds which it forms. ~oxides of barium.~ barium oxide (bao) can be obtained by strongly heating the nitrate: ba(no_{ })_{ } = bao + no_{ } + o. heated to a low red heat in the air, the oxide combines with oxygen, forming the peroxide (bao_{ }). if the temperature is raised still higher, or the pressure is reduced, oxygen is given off and the oxide is once more formed. the reaction bao_{ } <--> bao + o is reversible and has been used as a means of separating oxygen from the air. treated with acids, barium peroxide yields hydrogen peroxide: bao_{ } + hcl = bacl_{ } + h_{ }o_{ }. ~barium chloride~ (bacl_{ }· h_{ }o). barium chloride is a white well-crystallized substance which is easily prepared from the native carbonate. it is largely used in the laboratory as a reagent to detect the presence of sulphuric acid or soluble sulphates. ~barium sulphate~ _(barytes)_ (baso_{ }). barium sulphate occurs in nature in the form of heavy white crystals. it is precipitated as a crystalline powder when a barium salt is added to a solution of a sulphate or sulphuric acid: bacl_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } = baso_{ } + hcl. this precipitate is used, as are also the finely ground native sulphate and carbonate, as a pigment in paints. on account of its low cost it is sometimes used as an adulterant of white lead, which is also a heavy white substance. barium compounds color the flame green, and the nitrate (ba(no_{ })_{ }) is used in the manufacture of green lights. soluble barium compounds are poisonous. radium ~historical.~ in the french scientist becquerel observed that the mineral pitchblende possesses certain remarkable properties. it affects photographic plates even in complete darkness, and discharges a gold-leaf electroscope when brought close to it. in madam curie made a careful study of pitchblende to see if these properties belong to it or to some unknown substance contained in it. she succeeded in extracting from it a very small quantity of a substance containing a new element which she named radium. in madam curie succeeded in obtaining radium itself by the electrolysis of radium chloride. it is a silver-white metal melting at about °. it blackens in the air, forming a nitride, and decomposes water. its atomic weight is about . . ~properties.~ compounds of radium affect a photographic plate or electroscope even through layers of paper or sheets of metal. they also bring about chemical changes in substances placed near them. investigation of these strange properties has suggested that the radium atoms are unstable and undergo a decomposition. as a result of this decomposition very minute bodies, to which the name corpuscles has been given, are projected from the radium atom with exceedingly great velocity. it is to these corpuscles that the strange properties of radium are due. it seems probable that the gas helium is in some way formed during the decomposition of radium. two or three other elements, particularly uranium and thorium, have been found to possess many of the properties of radium in smaller degree. ~radium and the atomic theory.~ if these views in regard to radium should prove to be well founded, it will be necessary to modify in some respects the conception of the atom as developed in a former chapter. the atom would have to be regarded as a compound unit made up of several parts. in a few cases, as in radium and uranium, it would appear that this unit is unstable and undergoes transformation into more stable combinations. this modification would not, in any essential way, be at variance with the atomic theory as propounded by dalton. exercises . what properties have the alkaline-earth metals in common with the alkali metals? in what respects do they differ? . write the equation for the reaction between calcium carbide and water. . for what is calcium chlorate used? . could limestone be completely decomposed if heated in a closed vessel? . caves often occur in limestone. account for their formation. . what is the significance of the term fluorspar? (consult dictionary.) . could calcium chloride be used in place of barium chloride in testing for sulphates? . what weight of water is necessary to slake the lime obtained from ton of pure calcium carbonate? . what weight of gypsum is necessary in the preparation of ton of plaster of paris? . write equations to represent the reactions involved in the preparation of strontium hydroxide and strontium nitrate from strontianite. . write equations to represent the reactions involved in the preparation of barium chloride from heavy spar. . could barium hydroxide be used in place of calcium hydroxide in testing for carbon dioxide? chapter xxv the magnesium family =========================================================================== |symbol |atomic |density |melting |boiling | oxide | |weight | | point | point | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- magnesium | mg | . | . | ° | ° | mgo zinc | zn | . | . | ° | ° | zno cadmium | cd | . | . | ° | ° | cdo =========================================================================== ~the family.~ in the magnesium family are included the four elements: magnesium, zinc, cadmium, and mercury. between the first three of these metals there is a close family resemblance, such as has been traced between the members of the two preceding families. mercury in some respects is more similar to copper and will be studied in connection with that metal. . _properties._ when heated to a high temperature in the air each of these metals combines with oxygen to form an oxide of the general formula mo, in which m represents the metal. magnesium decomposes boiling water slowly, while zinc and cadmium have but little action on it. . _compounds._ the members of this group are divalent in nearly all their compounds, so that the formulas of their salts resemble those of the alkaline-earth metals. like the alkaline-earth metals, their carbonates and phosphates are insoluble in water. their sulphates, however, are readily soluble. unlike both the alkali and alkaline-earth metals, their hydroxides are nearly insoluble in water. most of their compounds dissociate in such a way as to give a simple, colorless, metallic ion. magnesium ~occurrence.~ magnesium is a very abundant element in nature, ranking a little below calcium in this respect. like calcium, it is a constituent of many rocks and also occurs in the form of soluble salts. ~preparation.~ the metal magnesium, like most metals whose oxides are difficult to reduce with carbon, was formerly prepared by heating the anhydrous chloride with sodium: mgcl_{ } + na = nacl + mg. it is now made by electrolysis, but instead of using as the electrolyte the melted anhydrous chloride, which is difficult to obtain, the natural mineral carnallite is used. this is melted in an iron pot which also serves as the cathode in the electrolysis. a rod of carbon dipping into the melted salt serves as the anode. the apparatus is very similar to the one employed in the preparation of sodium. ~properties.~ magnesium is a rather tough silvery-white metal of small density. air does not act rapidly upon it, but a thin film of oxide forms upon its surface, dimming its bright luster. the common acids dissolve it with the formation of the corresponding salts. it can be ignited readily and in burning liberates much heat and gives a brilliant white light. this light is very rich in the rays which affect photographic plates, and the metal in the form of fine powder is extensively used in the production of flash lights and for white lights in pyrotechnic displays. ~magnesium oxide~ (_magnesia_) (mgo). magnesium oxide, sometimes called magnesia or magnesia usta, resembles lime in many respects. it is much more easily formed than lime and can be made in the same way,--by igniting the carbonate. it is a white powder, very soft and light, and is unchanged by heat even at very high temperatures. for this reason it is used in the manufacture of crucibles, for lining furnaces, and for other purposes where a refractory substance is needed. it combines with water to form magnesium hydroxide, but much more slowly and with the production of much less heat than in the case of calcium oxide. ~magnesium hydroxide~ (mg(oh)_{ }). the hydroxide formed in this way is very slightly soluble in water, but enough dissolves to give the water an alkaline reaction. magnesium hydroxide is therefore a fairly strong base. it is an amorphous white substance. neither magnesia nor magnesium salts have a very marked effect upon the system; and for this reason magnesia is a very suitable antidote for poisoning by strong acids, since any excess introduced into the system will have no injurious effect. ~magnesium cement.~ a paste of magnesium hydroxide and water slowly absorbs carbon dioxide from the air and becomes very hard. the hardness of the product is increased by the presence of a considerable amount of magnesium chloride in the paste. the hydroxide, with or without the chloride, is used in the preparation of cements for some purposes. ~magnesium carbonate~ (mgco_{ }). magnesium carbonate is a very abundant mineral. it occurs in a number of localities as magnesite, which is usually amorphous, but sometimes forms pure crystals resembling calcite. more commonly it is found associated with calcium carbonate. the mineral dolomite has the composition caco_{ }·mgco_{ }. limestone containing smaller amounts of magnesium carbonate is known as dolomitic limestone. dolomite is one of the most common rocks, forming whole mountain masses. it is harder and less readily attacked by acids than limestone. it is valuable as a building stone and as ballast for roadbeds and foundations. like calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate is insoluble in water, though easily dissolved by acids. ~basic carbonate of magnesium.~ we should expect to find magnesium carbonate precipitated when a soluble magnesium salt and a soluble carbonate are brought together: na_{ }co_{ } + mgcl_{ } = mgco_{ } + nacl. instead of this, some carbon dioxide escapes and the product is found to be a basic carbonate. the most common basic carbonate of magnesium has the formula mgco_{ }·mg(oh)_{ }, and is sometimes called magnesia alba. this compound is formed by the partial hydrolysis of the normal carbonate at first precipitated: mgco_{ } + h_{ }o = mgco_{ }·mg(oh)_{ } + h_{ }co_{ }. ~magnesium chloride~ (mgcl_{ }· h_{ }o). magnesium chloride is found in many natural waters and in many salt deposits (see stassfurt salts). it is obtained as a by-product in the manufacture of potassium chloride from carnallite. as there is no very important use for it, large quantities annually go to waste. when heated to drive off the water of crystallization the chloride is decomposed as shown in the equation mgcl_{ }· h_{ }o = mgo + hcl + h_{ }o. owing to the abundance of magnesium chloride, this reaction is being used to some extent in the preparation of both magnesium oxide and hydrochloric acid. ~boiler scale.~ when water which contains certain salts in solution is evaporated in steam boilers, a hard insoluble material called _scale_ deposits in the boiler. the formation of this scale may be due to several distinct causes. . _to the deposit of calcium sulphate._ this salt, while sparingly soluble in cold water, is almost completely insoluble in superheated water. consequently it is precipitated when water containing it is heated in a boiler. . _to decomposition of acid carbonates._ as we have seen, calcium and magnesium acid carbonates are decomposed on heating, forming insoluble normal carbonates: ca(hco_{ })_{ } = caco_{ } + h_{ }o + co_{ }. . _to hydrolysis of magnesium salts._ magnesium chloride, and to some extent magnesium sulphate, undergo hydrolysis when superheated in solution, and the magnesium hydroxide, being sparingly soluble, precipitates: mgcl_{ } + h_{ }o <--> mg(oh)_{ } + hcl. this scale adheres tightly to the boiler in compact layers and, being a non-conductor of heat, causes much waste of fuel. it is very difficult to remove, owing to its hardness and resistance to reagents. thick scale sometimes cracks, and the water coming in contact with the overheated iron occasions an explosion. moreover, the acids set free in the hydrolysis of the magnesium salts attack the iron tubes and rapidly corrode them. these causes combine to make the formation of scale a matter which occasions much trouble in cases where hard water is used in steam boilers. water containing such salts should be softened, therefore, before being used in boilers. ~magnesium sulphate~ (_epsom salt_) (mgso_{ }· h_{ }o). like the chloride, magnesium sulphate is found rather commonly in springs and in salt deposits. a very large deposit of the almost pure salt has been found in wyoming. its name was given to it because of its abundant occurrence in the waters of the epsom springs in england. magnesium sulphate has many uses in the industries. it is used to a small extent in the preparation of sodium and potassium sulphates, as a coating for cotton cloth, in the dye industry, in tanning, and in the manufacture of paints and laundry soaps. to some extent it is used in medicine. ~magnesium silicates.~ many silicates containing magnesium are known and some of them are important substances. serpentine, asbestos, talc, and meerschaum are examples of such substances. zinc ~occurrence.~ zinc never occurs free in nature. its compounds have been found in many different countries, but it is not a constituent of common rocks and minerals, and its occurrence is rather local and confined to definite deposits or pockets. it occurs chiefly in the following ores: sphalerite (zinc blende) zns. zincite zno. smithsonite znco_{ }. willemite zn_{ }sio_{ }. franklinite zno·fe_{ }o_{ }. one fourth of the world's output of zinc comes from the united states, missouri being the largest producer. ~metallurgy.~ the ores employed in the preparation of zinc are chiefly the sulphide, oxide, and carbonate. they are first roasted in the air, by which process they are changed into oxide: znco_{ } = zno + co_{ }, zns + o = zno + so_{ }. the oxide is then mixed with coal dust, and the mixture is heated in earthenware muffles or retorts, natural gas being used as fuel in many cases. the oxide is reduced by this means to the metallic state, and the zinc, being volatile at the high temperature reached, distills and is collected in suitable receivers. at first the zinc collects in the form of fine powder, called zinc dust or flowers of zinc, recalling the formation under similar conditions of flowers of sulphur. later, when the whole apparatus has become warm, the zinc condenses to a liquid in the receiver, from which it is drawn off into molds. commercial zinc often contains a number of impurities, especially carbon, arsenic, and iron. ~physical properties.~ pure zinc is a rather heavy bluish-white metal with a high luster. it melts at about °, and if heated much above this temperature in the air takes fire and burns with a very bright bluish flame. it boils at about ° and can therefore be purified by distillation. many of the physical properties of zinc are much influenced by the temperature and previous treatment of the metal. when cast into ingots from the liquid state it becomes at ordinary temperatures quite hard, brittle, and highly crystalline. at ° it is malleable and can be rolled into thin sheets; at higher temperatures it again becomes very brittle. when once rolled into sheets it retains its softness and malleability at ordinary temperatures. when melted and poured into water it forms thin brittle flakes, and in this condition is called granulated or mossy zinc. ~chemical properties.~ zinc is tarnished superficially by moist air, but beyond this is not affected by it. it does not decompose even boiling water. when the metal is quite pure, sulphuric and hydrochloric acids have scarcely any action upon it; when, however, it contains small amounts of other metals such as magnesium or arsenic, or when it is merely in contact with metallic platinum, brisk action takes place and hydrogen is evolved. for this reason, when pure zinc is used in the preparation of hydrogen a few drops of platinum chloride are often added to the solution to assist the chemical action. nitric acid dissolves the metal readily, with the formation of zinc nitrate and various reduction products of nitric acid. the strong alkalis act upon zinc and liberate hydrogen: zn + koh = zn(ok)_{ } + h. the product of this reaction, potassium zincate, is a salt of zinc hydroxide, which is thus seen to have acid properties, though it usually acts as a base. ~uses of zinc.~ the metal has many familiar uses. rolled into sheets, it is used as a lining for vessels which are to contain water. as a thin film upon the surface of iron (galvanized iron) it protects the iron from rust. iron is usually galvanized by dipping it into a bath of melted zinc, but electrical methods are also employed. zinc plates are used in many forms of electrical batteries. in the laboratory zinc is used in the preparation of hydrogen, and in the form of zinc dust as a reducing agent. one of the largest uses of zinc is in the manufacture of alloys. brass, an alloy of zinc and copper, is the most important of these; german silver, consisting of copper, zinc, and nickel, has many uses; various bronzes, coin metals, and bearing metals also contain zinc. its ability to alloy with silver finds application in the separation of silver from lead (see silver). ~compounds of zinc.~ in general, the compounds of zinc are similar in formula and appearance to those of magnesium, but in other properties they often differ markedly. a number of them have value in commercial ways. ~zinc oxide~ (_zinc white_) (zno). zinc oxide occurs in impure form in nature, being colored red by manganese and iron compounds. it can be prepared just like magnesium oxide, but is more often made by burning the metal. zinc oxide is a pure white powder which becomes yellow on heating and regains its white color when cold. it is much used as a white pigment in paints, under the name of zinc white, and has the advantage over white lead in that it is not changed in color by sulphur compounds, while lead turns black. it is also used in the manufacture of rubber goods. ~commercial preparation of zinc oxide.~ commercially it is often made from franklinite in the following way. the franklinite is mixed with coal and heated to a high temperature in a furnace, by which process the zinc is set free and converted into vapor. as the vapor leaves the furnace through a conduit it meets a current of air and takes fire in it, forming zinc oxide. the oxide passes on and is filtered from the air through canvas bags, which allow the air to pass but retain the oxide. it is thus made by burning the metal, though the metal is not actually isolated in the process. ~soluble salts.~ the soluble salts of zinc can be made by dissolving the metal or the oxide in the appropriate acid. they are all somewhat poisonous. the sulphate and chloride are the most familiar. ~zinc sulphate~ (_white vitriol_) (znso_{ }· h_{ }o). this salt is readily crystallized from strong solutions in transparent colorless crystals. it is prepared commercially by careful roasting of the sulphide: zns + o = znso_{ }. ~zinc chloride~ (zncl_{ }·h_{ }o). when a solution of zinc chloride is slowly evaporated a salt of the composition zncl_{ }·h_{ }o crystallizes out. if the water is completely expelled by heat and the residue distilled, the anhydrous chloride is obtained and may be cast into sticks or broken into lumps. in this distillation, just as in heating magnesium chloride, some of the chloride is decomposed: zncl_{ }·h_{ }o = zno + hcl. the anhydrous chloride has a great affinity for water, and is used as a dehydrating agent. it is also a germicide, and wood which is to be exposed to conditions which favor decay, as, for example, railroad ties, is often soaked in solutions of this salt. ~insoluble compounds.~ the insoluble compounds of zinc can be prepared by precipitation. the most important are the sulphide, carbonate, and hydroxide. ~zinc sulphide~ (zns). this substance occurs as the mineral sphalerite, and is one of the most valued ores of zinc. very large deposits occur in southwestern missouri. the natural mineral is found in large crystals or masses, resembling resin in color and luster. when prepared by precipitation the sulphide is white. cadmium ~the element.~ this element occurs in small quantities in some zinc ores. in the course of the metallurgy of zinc the cadmium compounds undergo chemical changes quite similar to those of the zinc compounds, and the cadmium distills along with the zinc. being more volatile, it comes over with the first of the zinc and is prepared from the first portions of the distillate by special methods of purification. the element very closely resembles zinc in most respects. some of its alloys are characterized by having low melting points. ~compounds of cadmium.~ among the compounds of cadmium may be mentioned the chloride (cdcl_{ }· h_{ }o), the sulphate ( cdso_{ }· h_{ }o), and the nitrate (cd(no_{ })_{ }· h_{ }o). these are white solids soluble in water. the sulphide (cds) is a bright yellow substance which is insoluble in water and in dilute acids. it is valuable as a pigment in fine paints. exercises . what properties have the metals of the magnesium family in common with the alkali metals; with the alkaline-earth metals? . compare the action of the metals of the magnesium group on water with that of the other metals studied. . what metals already studied are prepared by electrolysis? . write the equations representing the reactions between magnesium and hydrochloric acid; between magnesium and dilute sulphuric acid. . what property of magnesium was taken advantage of in the isolation of argon? . with phosphoric acid magnesium forms salts similar to those of calcium. write the names and formulas of the corresponding magnesium salts. . how could you distinguish between magnesium chloride and magnesium sulphate? between glauber's salts and epsom salts? . what weight of carnallite is necessary in the preparation of g. of magnesium? . account for the fact that paints made of zinc oxide are not colored by hydrosulphuric acid. . what hydroxide studied, other than zinc hydroxide, has both acid and basic properties? . write equations showing how the following compounds of zinc may be obtained from metallic zinc: the oxide, chloride, nitrate, carbonate, sulphate, sulphide, hydroxide. chapter xxvi the aluminium family ~the family.~ the element aluminium is the most abundant member of the group of elements known as the aluminium family; indeed, the other members of the family--gallium, indium, and thallium--are of such rare occurrence that they need not be separately described. the elements of the family are ordinarily trivalent, so that the formulas for their compounds differ from those of the elements so far studied. their hydroxides are practically insoluble in water and are very weak bases; indeed, the bases are so weak that their salts are often hydrolyzed into free base and free acid in solution. the salts formed from these bases usually contain water of crystallization, which cannot be driven off without decomposing them more or less. the trivalent metals, which in addition to aluminium include also iron and chromium, are sometimes called the _earth metals_. the name refers to the earthy appearance of the oxides of these metals, and to the fact that many earths, soils, and rocks are composed in part of these substances. aluminium ~occurrence.~ aluminium never occurs in the free state in nature, owing to its great affinity for oxygen. in combined form, as oxides, silicates, and a few other salts, it is both abundant and widely distributed, being an essential constituent of all soils and of most rocks excepting limestone and sandstone. cryolite (na_{ }alf_{ }), found in greenland, and bauxite, which is an aluminium hydroxide usually mixed with some iron hydroxide, are important minerals. it is estimated that aluminium composes about % of the earth's crust. in the industries the metal is called aluminum, but its chemical name is aluminium. [illustration: fig. ] ~preparation.~ aluminium was first prepared by wöhler, in , by heating anhydrous aluminium chloride with potassium: alcl_{ } + k = kcl + al. this method was tried after it was found impossible to reduce the oxide of aluminium with carbon. the metal possessed such interesting properties and promised to be so useful that many efforts were made to devise a cheap way of preparing it. the method which has proved most successful consists in the electrolysis of the oxide dissolved in melted cryolite. ~metallurgy.~ an iron box a (fig. ) about eight feet long and six feet wide is connected with a powerful generator in such a way as to serve as the cathode upon which the aluminium is deposited. three or four rows of carbon rods b dip into the box and serve as the anodes. the box is partially filled with cryolite and the current is turned on, generating enough heat to melt the cryolite. aluminium oxide is then added, and under the influence of the electric current it decomposes into aluminium and oxygen. the temperature is maintained above the melting point of aluminium, and the liquid metal, being heavier than cryolite, sinks to the bottom of the vessel, from which it is tapped off from time to time through the tap hole c. the oxygen in part escapes as gas, and in part combines with the carbon of the anode, the combustion being very brilliant. the process is carried on at niagara falls. the largest expense in the process, apart from the cost of electrical energy, is the preparation of aluminium oxide free from other oxides, for most of the oxide found in nature is too impure to serve without refining. bauxite is the principal ore used as a source of the aluminium because it is converted into pure oxide without great difficulty. since common clay is a silicate of aluminium and is everywhere abundant, it might be expected that this would be utilized in the preparation of aluminium. it is, however, very difficult to extract the aluminium from a silicate, and no practical method has been found which will accomplish this. ~physical properties.~ aluminium is a tin-white metal which melts at ° and is very light, having a density of . . it is stiff and strong, and with frequent annealing can be rolled into thin foil. it is a good conductor of heat and electricity, though not so good as copper for a given cross section of wire. ~chemical properties.~ aluminium is not perceptibly acted on by boiling water, and moist air merely dims its luster. further action is prevented in each case by the formation of an extremely thin film of oxide upon the surface of the metal. it combines directly with chlorine, and when heated in oxygen burns with great energy and the liberation of much heat. it is therefore a good reducing agent. hydrochloric acid acts upon it, forming aluminium chloride: nitric acid and dilute sulphuric acid have almost no action on it, but hot, concentrated sulphuric acid acts upon it in the same way as upon copper: al + h_{ }so_{ } = al_{ }(so_{ })_{ } + h_{ }o + so_{ }. alkalis readily attack the metal, liberating hydrogen, as in the case of zinc: al + koh = al(ok)_{ } + h. salt solutions, such as sea water, corrode the metal rapidly. it alloys readily with other metals. ~uses of aluminium.~ these properties suggest many uses for the metal. its lightness, strength, and permanence make it well adapted for many construction purposes. these same properties have led to its extensive use in the manufacture of cooking utensils. the fact that it is easily corroded by salt solutions is, however, a disadvantage. owing to its small resistance to electrical currents, it is replacing copper to some extent in electrical construction, especially for trolley and power wires. some of its alloys have very valuable properties, and a considerable part of the aluminium manufactured is used for this purpose. aluminium bronze, consisting of about % copper and % aluminium, has a pure golden color, is strong and malleable, is easily cast, and is permanent in the air. considerable amounts of aluminium steel are also made. ~goldschmidt reduction process.~ aluminium is frequently employed as a powerful reducing agent, many metallic oxides which resist reduction by carbon being readily reduced by it. the aluminium in the form of a fine powder is mixed with the metallic oxide, together with some substance such as fluorspar to act as a flux. the mixture is ignited, and the aluminium unites with the oxygen of the metallic oxide, liberating the metal. this collects in a fused condition under the flux. an enormous quantity of heat is liberated in this reaction, and a temperature as high as ° can be reached. the heat of the reaction is turned to practical account in welding car rails, steel castings, and in similar operations where an intense local heat is required. a mixture of aluminium with various metallic oxides, ready prepared for such purposes, is sold under the name of _thermite_. [illustration: fig. ] ~preparation of chromium by the goldschmidt method.~ a mixture of chromium oxide and aluminium powder is placed in a hessian crucible (a, fig. ), and on top of it is placed a small heap b of a mixture of sodium peroxide and aluminium, into which is stuck a piece of magnesium ribbon c. powdered fluorspar d is placed around the sodium peroxide, after which the crucible is set on a pan of sand and the magnesium ribbon ignited. when the flame reaches the sodium peroxide mixture combustion of the aluminium begins with almost explosive violence, so that great care must be taken in the experiment. the heat of this combustion starts the reaction in the chromium oxide mixture, and the oxide is reduced to metallic chromium. when the crucible has cooled a button of chromium will be found in the bottom. ~aluminium oxide~ (al_{ }o_{ }). this substance occurs in several forms in nature. the relatively pure crystals are called corundum, while emery is a variety colored dark gray or black, usually with iron compounds. in transparent crystals, tinted different colors by traces of impurities, it forms such precious stones as the sapphire, oriental ruby, topaz, and amethyst. all these varieties are very hard, falling little short of the diamond in this respect. chemically pure aluminium oxide can be made by igniting the hydroxide, when it forms an amorphous white powder: al(oh)_{ } = al_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o. the natural varieties, corundum and emery, are used for cutting and grinding purposes; the purest forms, together with the artificially prepared oxide, are largely used in the preparation of aluminium. ~aluminium hydroxide~ (al(oh)_{ }). the hydroxide occurs in nature as the mineral hydrargyllite, and in a partially dehydrated form called bauxite. it can be prepared by adding ammonium hydroxide to any soluble aluminium salt, forming a semi-transparent precipitate which is insoluble in water but very hard to filter. it dissolves in most acids to form soluble salts, and in the strong bases to form aluminates, as indicated in the equations al(oh)_{ } + hcl = alcl_{ } + h_{ }o, al(oh)_{ } + naoh = al(ona)_{ } + h_{ }o. it may act, therefore, either as a weak base or as a weak acid, its action depending upon the character of the substances with which it is in contact. when heated gently the hydroxide loses part of its hydrogen and oxygen according to the equation al(oh)_{ } = alo·oh + h_{ }o. this substance, the formula of which is frequently written halo_{ }, is a more pronounced acid than is the hydroxide, and its salts are frequently formed when aluminium compounds are fused with alkalis. the magnesium salt mg(alo_{ })_{ } is called spinel, and many other of its salts, called aluminates, are found in nature. when heated strongly the hydroxide is changed into oxide, which will not again take up water on being moistened. ~mordants and dyeing.~ aluminium hydroxide has the peculiar property of combining with many soluble coloring materials and forming insoluble products with them. on this account it is often used as a filter to remove objectionable colors from water. this property also leads to its wide use in the dye industry. many dyes will not adhere to natural fibers such as cotton and wool, that is, will not "dye fast." if, however, the cloth to be dyed is soaked in a solution of aluminium compounds and then treated with ammonia, the aluminium salts which have soaked into the fiber will be converted into the hydroxide, which, being insoluble, remains in the body of it. if the fiber is now dipped into a solution of the dye, the aluminium hydroxide combines with the color material and fastens, or "fixes," it upon the fiber. a substance which serves this purpose is called a _mordant_, and aluminium salts, particularly the acetate, are used in this way. ~aluminium chloride~ (alcl_{ }· h_{ }o). this substance is prepared by dissolving the hydroxide in hydrochloric acid and evaporating to crystallization. when heated it is converted into the oxide, resembling magnesium in this respect: (alcl_{ }· h_{ }o) = al_{ }o_{ } + hcl + h_{ }o. the anhydrous chloride, which has some important uses, is made by heating aluminium turnings in a current of chlorine. ~alums.~ aluminium sulphate can be prepared by the action of sulphuric acid upon aluminium hydroxide. it has the property of combining with the sulphates of the alkali metals to form compounds called _alums_. thus, with potassium sulphate the reaction is expressed by the equation k_{ }so_{ } + al_{ }(so_{ })_{ } + h_{ }o = (kal(so_{ })_{ }· h_{ }o). under similar conditions ammonium sulphate yields ammonium alum: (nh_{ })_{ }so_{ } + al_{ }(so_{ })_{ } + h_{ }o = (nh_{ }al(so_{ })_{ }· h_{ }o). other trivalent sulphates besides aluminium sulphate can form similar compounds with the alkali sulphates, and these compounds are also called alums, though they contain no aluminium. they all crystallize in octahedra and contain twelve molecules of water of crystallization. the alums most frequently prepared are the following: potassium alum kal(so_{ })_{ }· h_{ }o. ammonium alum nh_{ }al(so_{ })_{ }· h_{ }o. ammonium iron alum nh_{ }fe(so_{ })_{ }· h_{ }o. potassium chrome alum kcr(so_{ })_{ }· h_{ }o. an alum may therefore be regarded as a compound derived from two molecules of sulphuric acid, in which one hydrogen atom has been displaced by the univalent alkali atom, and the other three hydrogen atoms by an atom of one of the trivalent metals, such as aluminium, iron, or chromium. very large, well-formed crystals of an alum can be prepared by suspending a small crystal by a thread in a saturated solution of the alum, as shown in fig. . the small crystal slowly grows and assumes a very perfect form. [illustration: fig. ] ~other salts of aluminium.~ while aluminium hydroxide forms fairly stable salts with strong acids, it is such a weak base that its salts with weak acids are readily hydrolyzed. thus, when an aluminium salt and a soluble carbonate are brought together in solution we should expect to have aluminium carbonate precipitated according to the equation na_{ }co_{ } + alcl_{ } = al_{ }(co_{ })_{ } + nacl. but if it is formed at all, it instantly begins to hydrolyze, the products of the hydrolysis being aluminium hydroxide and carbonic acid, al_{ }(co_{ })_{ } + h_{ }o = al(oh)_{ } + h_{ }co_{ }. similarly a soluble sulphide, instead of precipitating aluminium sulphide (al_{ }s_{ }), precipitates aluminium hydroxide; for hydrogen sulphide is such a weak acid that the aluminium sulphide at first formed hydrolyzes at once, forming aluminium hydroxide and hydrogen sulphide: na_{ }s + alcl_{ } + h_{ }o = al(oh)_{ } + nacl + h_{ }s. ~alum baking powders.~ it is because of the hydrolysis of aluminium carbonate that alum is used as a constituent of some baking powders. the alum baking powders consist of a mixture of alum and sodium hydrogen carbonate. when water is added the two compounds react together, forming aluminium carbonate, which hydrolyzes into aluminium hydroxide and carbonic acid. the carbon dioxide from the latter escapes through the dough and in so doing raises it into a porous condition, which is the end sought in the use of a baking powder. ~aluminium silicates.~ one of the most common constituents of rocks is feldspar (kalsi_{ }o_{ }), a mixed salt of potassium and aluminium with the polysilicic acid (h_{ }si_{ }o_{ }). under the influence of moisture, carbon dioxide, and changes of temperature this substance is constantly being broken down into soluble potassium compounds and hydrated aluminium silicate. this compound has the formula al_{ }si_{ }o_{ }· h_{ }o. in relatively pure condition it is called kaolin; in the impure state, mixed with sand and other substances, it forms common clay. mica is another very abundant mineral, having varying composition, but being essentially of the formula kalsio_{ }. serpentine, talc, asbestos, and meerschaum are important complex silicates of aluminium and magnesium, and granite is a mechanical mixture of quartz, feldspar, and mica. ~ceramic industries.~ many articles of greatest practical importance, ranging from the roughest brick and tile to the finest porcelain and chinaware, are made from some form of kaolin, or clay. no very precise classification of such ware can be made, as the products vary greatly in properties, depending upon the materials used and the treatment during manufacture. porcelain is made from the purest kaolin, to which must be added some less pure, plastic kaolin, since the pure substance is not sufficiently plastic. there is also added some more fusible substance, such as feldspar, gypsum, or lime, together with some pure quartz. the constituents must be ground very fine, and when thoroughly mixed and moistened must make a plastic mass which can be molded into any desired form. the article molded from such materials is then burned. in this process the article is slowly heated to a point at which it begins to soften and almost fuse, and then it is allowed to cool slowly. at this stage, a very thin vessel will be translucent and have an almost glassy fracture; if, however, it is somewhat thicker, or has not been heated quite so high, it will still be porous, and partly on this account and partly to improve its appearance it is usually glazed. glazing is accomplished by spreading upon the object a thin layer of a more fusible mixture of the same materials as compose the body of the object itself, and again heating until the glaze melts to a transparent glassy coating upon the surface of the vessel. in some cases fusible mixtures of quite different composition from that used in fashioning the vessel may be used as a glaze. oxides of lead, zinc, and barium are often used in this way. when less carefully selected materials are used, or quite thick vessels are made, various grades of stoneware are produced. the inferior grades are glazed by throwing a quantity of common salt into the kiln towards the end of the first firing. in the form of vapor the salt attacks the surface of the baked ware and forms an easily fusible sodium silicate upon it, which constitutes a glaze. vitrified bricks, made from clay or ground shale, are burned until the materials begin to fuse superficially, forming their own glaze. other forms of brick and tile are not glazed at all, but are left porous. the red color of ordinary brick and earthenware is due to an oxide of iron formed in the burning process. the decorations upon china are sometimes painted upon the baked ware and then glazed over, and sometimes painted upon the glaze and burned in by a third firing. care must be taken to use such pigments as are not affected by a high heat and do not react chemically with the constituents of the baked ware or the glaze. exercises . what metals and compounds studied are prepared by electrolysis? . write the equation for the reaction between aluminium and hydrochloric acid; between aluminium and sulphuric acid (in two steps). . what hydroxides other than aluminium hydroxide have both acid and basic properties? . write equations showing the methods used for preparing aluminium hydroxide and sulphate. . write the general formula of an alum, representing an atom of an alkali metal by x and an atom of a trivalent metal by y. . what is meant by the term polysilicic acid, as used in the discussion of aluminium silicates? . compare the properties of the hydroxides of the different groups of metals so far studied. . in what respects does aluminium oxide differ from calcium oxide in properties? . supposing bauxite to be % aluminium hydroxide, what weight of it is necessary for the preparation of kg. of aluminium? chapter xxvii the iron family =================================================================== | | | | | | | | | approximate | | symbol | atomic | density | melting | oxides | | weight | | point | ________|________|________|_________|_____________|________________ | | | | | iron | fe | . | . | ° | feo, fe_{ }o_{ } cobalt | co | . | . | ° | coo, co_{ }o_{ } nickel | ni | . | . | ° | nio, ni_{ }o_{ } =================================================================== ~the family.~ the elements iron, cobalt, and nickel form a group in the eighth column of the periodic table. the atomic weights of the three are very close together, and there is not the same gradual gradation in the properties of the three elements that is noticed in the families in which the atomic weights differ considerably in magnitude. the elements are very similar in properties, the similarity being so great in the case of nickel and cobalt that it is difficult to separate them by chemical analysis. the elements occur in nature chiefly as oxides and sulphides, though they have been found in very small quantities in the native state, usually in meteorites. their sulphides, carbonates, and phosphates are insoluble in water, the other common salts being soluble. their salts are usually highly colored, those of iron being yellow or light green as a rule, those of nickel darker green, while cobalt salts are usually rose colored. the metals are obtained by reducing the oxides with carbon. iron ~occurrence.~ the element iron has long been known, since its ores are very abundant and it is not difficult to prepare the metal from them in fairly pure condition. it occurs in nature in many forms of combination,--in large deposits as oxides, sulphides, and carbonates, and in smaller quantities in a great variety of minerals. indeed, very few rocks or soils are free from small amounts of iron, and it is assimilated by plants and animals playing an important part in life processes. ~metallurgy.~ it will be convenient to treat of the metallurgy of iron under two heads,--materials used and process. ~materials used.~ four distinct materials are used in the metallurgy of iron: . _iron ore._ the ores most frequently used in the metallurgy of iron are the following: hematite fe_{ }o_{ }. magnetite fe_{ }o_{ }. siderite feco_{ }. limonite fe_{ }o_{ }· h_{ }o. these ores always contain impurities, such as silica, sulphides, and earthy materials. all ores, with the exception of the oxides, are first roasted to expel any water and carbon dioxide present and to convert any sulphide into oxide. . _carbon._ carbon in some form is necessary both as a fuel and as a reducing agent. in former times wood charcoal was used to supply the carbon, but now anthracite coal or coke is almost universally used. . _hot air._ to maintain the high temperature required for the reduction of iron a very active combustion of fuel is necessary. this is secured by forcing a strong blast of hot air into the lower part of the furnace during the reduction process. . _flux._ (a) _purpose of the flux._ all the materials which enter the furnace must leave it again either in the form of gases or as liquids. the iron is drawn off as the liquid metal after its reduction. to secure the removal of the earthy matter charged into the furnace along with the ore, materials are added to the charge which will, at the high temperature of the furnace, combine with the impurities in the ore, forming a liquid. the material added for this purpose is called the _flux_; the liquid produced from the flux and the ore is called _slag_. (b) _function of the slag._ while the main purpose of adding flux to the charge is to remove from the furnace in the form of liquid slag the impurities originally present in the ore, the slag thus produced serves several other functions. it keeps the contents of the furnace in a state of fusion, thus preventing clogging, and makes it possible for the small globules of iron to run together with greater ease into one large liquid mass. (c) _character of the slag._ the slag is really a kind of readily fusible glass, being essentially a calcium-aluminium silicate. the ore usually contains silica and some aluminium compounds, so that limestone (which also contains some silica and aluminium) is added to furnish the calcium required for the slag. if the ore and the limestone do not contain a sufficient amount of silica and aluminium for the formation of the slag, these ingredients are added in the form of sand and feldspar. in the formation of slag from these materials the ore is freed from the silica and aluminium which it contained. [illustration: fig. ] ~process.~ the reduction of iron is carried out in large towers called blast furnaces. the blast furnace (fig. ) is usually about ft. high and ft. in internal diameter at its widest part, narrowing somewhat both toward the top and toward the bottom. the walls are built of steel and lined with fire-brick. the base is provided with a number of pipes t, called tuyers, through which hot air can be forced into the furnace. the tuyers are supplied from a large pipe s, which circles the furnace as a girdle. the base has also an opening m, through which the liquid metal can be drawn off from time to time, and a second opening p, somewhat above the first, through which the excess of slag overflows. the top is closed by a movable trap c and c, called the cone, and through this the materials to be used are introduced. the gases produced by the combustion of the fuel and the reduction of the ore, together with the nitrogen of the air forced in through the tuyers, escape through pipes d, called downcomer pipes, which leave the furnace near the top. these gases are very hot and contain combustible substances, principally carbon monoxide; they are therefore utilized as fuel for the engines and also to heat the blast admitted through the tuyers. the lower part of the furnace is often furnished with a water jacket. this consists of a series of pipes w built into the walls, through which water can be circulated to reduce their temperature. charges consisting of coke (or anthracite coal), ore, and flux in proper proportions are introduced into the furnace at intervals through the trap top. the coke burns fiercely in the hot-air blast, giving an intense heat and forming carbon monoxide. the ore, working down in the furnace as the coke burns, becomes very hot, and by the combined reducing action of the carbon and carbon monoxide is finally reduced to metal and collects as a liquid in the bottom of the furnace, the slag floating on the molten iron. after a considerable amount of the iron has collected the slag is drawn off through the opening p. the molten iron is then drawn off into large ladles and taken to the converters for the manufacture of steel, or it is run out into sand molds, forming the bars or ingots called "pigs." the process is a continuous one, and when once started it is kept in operation for months or even years without interruption. it seems probable that the first product of combustion of the carbon, at the point where the tuyers enter the furnace, is carbon dioxide. this is at once reduced to carbon monoxide by the intensely heated carbon present, so that no carbon dioxide can be found at that point. for practical purposes, therefore, we may consider that carbon monoxide is the first product of combustion. ~varieties of iron.~ the iron of commerce is never pure, but contains varying amounts of other elements, such as carbon, silicon, phosphorus, sulphur, and manganese. these elements may either be alloyed with the iron or may be combined with it in the form of definite chemical compounds. in some instances, as in the case of graphite, the mixture may be merely mechanical. the properties of iron are very much modified by the presence of these elements and by the form of the combination between them and the iron; the way in which the metal is treated during its preparation has also a marked influence on its properties. owing to these facts many kinds of iron are recognized in commerce, the chief varieties being cast iron, wrought iron, and steel. ~cast iron.~ the product of the blast furnace, prepared as just described, is called cast iron. it varies considerably in composition, usually containing from to % iron, the remainder being largely carbon and silicon with smaller amounts of phosphorus and sulphur. when the melted metal from the blast furnace is allowed to cool rapidly most of the carbon remains in chemical combination with the iron, and the product is called white cast iron. if the cooling goes on slowly, the carbon partially separates as flakes of graphite which remain scattered through the metal. this product is softer and darker in color and is called gray cast iron. ~properties of cast iron.~ cast iron is hard, brittle, and rather easily melted (melting point about °). it cannot be welded or forged into shape, but is easily cast in sand molds. it is strong and rigid but not elastic. it is used for making castings and in the manufacture of other kinds of iron. cast iron, which contains the metal manganese up to the extent of %, together with about % carbon, is called spiegel iron; when more than this amount of manganese is present the product is called ferromanganese. the ferromanganese may contain as much as % manganese. these varieties of cast iron are much used in the manufacture of steel. ~wrought iron.~ wrought iron is made by burning out from cast iron most of the carbon, silicon, phosphorus, and sulphur which it contains. the process is called _puddling_, and is carried out in a furnace constructed as represented in fig. . the floor of the furnace f is somewhat concave and is made of iron covered with a layer of iron oxide. a long flame produced by burning fuel upon the grate g is directed downward upon the materials placed upon the floor, and the draught is maintained by the stack s. a is the ash box and t a trap to catch the solid particles carried into the stack by the draught. upon the floor of the furnace is placed the charge of cast iron, together with a small amount of material to make a slag. the iron is soon melted by the flame directed upon it, and the sulphur, phosphorus, and silicon are oxidized by the iron oxide, forming oxides which are anhydrides of acids. these combine with the flux, which is basic in character, or with the iron oxide, to form a slag. the carbon is also oxidized and escapes as carbon dioxide. as the iron is freed from other elements it becomes pasty, owing to the higher melting point of the purer iron, and in this condition forms small lumps which are raked together into a larger one. the large lump is then removed from the furnace and rolled or hammered into bars, the slag; being squeezed out in this process. the product has a stranded or fibrous structure. _the product of a puddling furnace is called wrought iron._ [illustration: fig. ] ~properties of wrought iron.~ wrought iron is nearly pure iron, usually containing about . % of other substances, chiefly carbon. it is tough, malleable, and fibrous in structure. it is easily bent and is not elastic, so it will not sustain pressure as well as cast iron. it can be drawn out into wire of great tensile strength, and can also be rolled into thin sheets (sheet iron). it melts at a high temperature (about °) and is therefore forged into shape rather than cast. if melted, it would lose its fibrous structure and be changed into a low carbon steel. ~steel.~ steel, like wrought iron, is made by burning out from cast iron a part of the carbon, silicon, phosphorus, and sulphur which it contains; but the process is carried out in a very different way, and usually, though not always, more carbon is found in steel than in wrought iron. a number of processes are in use, but nearly all the steel of commerce is made by one of the two following methods. [illustration: fig. ] . _bessemer process._ this process, invented about , is by far the most important. it is carried out in great egg-shaped crucibles called converters (fig. ), each one of which will hold as much as tons of steel. the converter is built of steel and lined with silica. it is mounted on trunnions t, so that it can be tipped over on its side for filling and emptying. one of the trunnions is hollow and a pipe p connects it with an air chamber a, which forms a false bottom to the converter. the true bottom is perforated, so that air can be forced in by an air blast admitted through the trunnion and the air chamber. white-hot, liquid cast iron from a blast furnace is run into the converter through its open necklike top o, the converter being tipped over to receive it; the air blast is then turned on and the converter rotated to a nearly vertical position. the elements in the iron are rapidly oxidized, the silicon first and then the carbon. the heat liberated in the oxidation, largely due to the combustion of silicon, keeps the iron in a molten condition. when the carbon is practically all burned out cast iron or spiegel iron, containing a known percentage of carbon, is added and allowed to mix thoroughly with the fluid. the steel is then run into molds, and the ingots so formed are hammered or rolled into rails or other forms. by this process any desired percentage of carbon can be added to the steel. low carbon steel, which does not differ much from wrought iron in composition, is now made in this way and is replacing the more expensive wrought iron for many purposes. ~the basic lining process.~ when the cast iron contains phosphorus and sulphur in appreciable quantities, the lining of the converter is made of dolomite. the silicon and carbon burn, followed by the phosphorus and sulphur, and the anhydrides of acids so formed combine with the basic oxides of the lining, forming a slag. this is known as the basic lining process. . _open-hearth process._ in this process a furnace very similar to a puddling furnace is used, but it is lined with silica or dolomite instead of iron oxide. a charge consisting in part of old scrap iron of any kind and in part of cast iron is melted in the furnace by a gas flame. the silicon and carbon are slowly burned away, and when a test shows that the desired percentage of carbon is present the steel is run out of the furnace. _steel may therefore be defined as the product of the bessemer or open-hearth processes._ ~properties of steel.~ bessemer and open-hearth steel usually contain only a few tenths of a per cent of carbon, less than . % silicon, and a very much smaller quantity of phosphorus and sulphur. any considerable amount of the latter elements makes the steel brittle, the sulphur affecting it when hot, and the phosphorus when cold. this kind of steel is used for structural purposes, for rails, and for nearly all large steel articles. it is hard, malleable, ductile, and melts at a lower temperature than wrought iron. it can be forged into shape, rolled into sheets, or cast in molds. ~relation of the three varieties of iron.~ it will be seen that wrought iron is usually very nearly pure iron, while steel contains an appreciable amount of alloy material, chiefly carbon, and cast iron still more of the same substances. it is impossible, however, to assign a given sample of iron to one of these three classes on the basis of its chemical composition alone. a low carbon steel, for example, may contain less carbon than a given sample of wrought iron. the real distinction between the three is the process by which they are made. the product of the blast furnace is cast iron; that of the puddling furnace is wrought iron; that of the bessemer and open-hearth methods is steel. ~tool steel.~ steel designed for use in the manufacture of edged tools and similar articles should be relatively free from silicon and phosphorus, but should contain from . to . % carbon. the percentage of carbon should be regulated by the exact use to which the steel is to be put. steel of this character is usually made in small lots from either bessemer or open-hearth steel in the following way. a charge of melted steel is placed in a large crucible and the calculated quantity of pure carbon is added. the carbon dissolves in the steel, and when the solution is complete the metal is poured out of the crucible. this is sometimes called crucible steel. ~tempering of steel.~ steel containing from . to . % carbon is characterized by the property of "taking temper." when the hot steel is suddenly cooled by plunging it into water or oil it becomes very hard and brittle. on carefully reheating this hard form it gradually becomes less brittle and softer, so that by regulating the temperature to which steel is reheated in tempering almost any condition of temper demanded for a given purpose, such as for making springs or cutting tools, can be obtained. ~steel alloys.~ it has been found that small quantities of a number of different elements when alloyed with steel very much improve its quality for certain purposes, each element having a somewhat different effect. among the elements most used in this connection are manganese, silicon, chromium, nickel, tungsten, and molybdenum. the usual method for adding these elements to the steel is to first prepare a very rich alloy of iron with the element to be added, and then add enough of this alloy to a large quantity of the steel to bring it to the desired composition. a rich alloy of iron with manganese or silicon can be prepared directly in a blast furnace, and is called ferromanganese or ferrosilicon. similar alloys of iron with the other elements mentioned are made in an electric furnace by reducing the mixed oxides with carbon. ~pure iron.~ perfectly pure iron is rarely prepared and is not adapted to commercial uses. it can be made by reducing pure oxide of iron in a current of hydrogen at a high temperature. prepared in this way it forms a black powder; when melted it forms a tin-white metal which is less fusible and more malleable than wrought iron. it is easily acted upon by moist air. ~compounds of iron.~ iron differs from the metals so far studied in that it is able to form two series of compounds in which the iron has two different valences. in the one series the iron is divalent and forms compounds which in formulas and many chemical properties are similar to the corresponding zinc compounds. it can also act as a trivalent metal, and in this condition forms salts similar to those of aluminium. those compounds in which the iron is divalent are known as _ferrous_ compounds, while those in which it is trivalent are known as _ferric_. ~oxides of iron.~ iron forms several oxides. ferrous oxide (feo) is not found in nature, but can be prepared artificially in the form of a black powder which easily takes up oxygen, forming ferric oxide: feo + o = fe_{ }o_{ }. ferric oxide is the most abundant ore of iron and occurs in great deposits, especially in the lake superior region. it is found in many mineral varieties which vary in density and color, the most abundant being hematite, which ranges in color from red to nearly black. when prepared by chemical processes it forms a red powder which is used as a paint pigment (venetian red) and as a polishing powder (rouge). magnetite has the formula fe_{ }o_{ } and is a combination of feo and fe_{ }o_{ }. it is a very valuable ore, but is less abundant than hematite. it is sometimes called magnetic oxide of iron, or lodestone, since it is a natural magnet. ~ferrous salts.~ these salts are obtained by dissolving iron in the appropriate acid, or, when insoluble, by precipitation. they are usually light green in color and crystallize well. in chemical reactions they are quite similar to the salts of magnesium and zinc, but differ from them in one important respect, namely, that they are easily changed into compounds in which the metal is trivalent. thus ferrous chloride treated with chlorine or aqua regia is changed into ferric chloride: fecl_{ } + cl = fecl_{ }. ferrous hydroxide exposed to moist air is rapidly changed into ferric hydroxide: fe(oh)_{ } + h_{ }o + o = fe(oh)_{ }. ~ferrous sulphate~ _(copperas, green vitriol)_ (feso_{ }· h_{ }o). ferrous sulphate is the most familiar ferrous compound. it is prepared commercially as a by-product in the steel-plate mills. steel plates are cleaned by the action of dilute sulphuric acid upon them, and in the process some of the iron dissolves. the liquors are concentrated and the green vitriol separates from them. ~ferrous sulphide~ (fes). ferrous sulphide is sometimes found in nature as a golden-yellow crystalline mineral. it is formed as a black precipitate when a soluble sulphide and an iron salt are brought together in solution: feso_{ } + na_{ }s = fes + na_{ }so_{ }. it can also be made as a heavy dark-brown solid by fusing together the requisite quantities of sulphur and iron. it is obtained as a by-product in the metallurgy of lead: pbs + fe = fes + pb. it is used in the laboratory in the preparation of hydrosulphuric acid: fes + hcl = fecl_{ } + h_{ }s. ~iron disulphide~ _(pyrites)_ (fes_{ }). this substance bears the same relation to ferrous sulphide that hydrogen dioxide does to water. it occurs abundantly in nature in the form of brass-yellow cubical crystals and in compact masses. sometimes the name "fool's gold" is applied to it from its superficial resemblance to the precious metal. it is used in very large quantities as a source of sulphur dioxide in the manufacture of sulphuric acid, since it burns readily in the air, forming ferric oxide and sulphur dioxide: fes_{ } + o = fe_{ }o_{ } + so_{ }. ~ferrous carbonate~ (feco_{ }). this compound occurs in nature as siderite, and is a valuable ore. it will dissolve to some extent in water containing carbon dioxide, just as will calcium carbonate, and waters containing it are called chalybeate waters. these chalybeate waters are supposed to possess certain medicinal virtues and form an important class of mineral waters. ~ferric salts.~ ferric salts are usually obtained by treating an acidified solution of a ferrous salt with an oxidizing agent: fecl_{ } + hcl + o = fecl_{ } + h_{ }o, feso_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } + o = fe_{ }(so_{ })_{ } + h_{ }o. they are usually yellow or violet in color, are quite soluble, and as a rule do not crystallize well. heated with water in the absence of free acid, they hydrolyze even more readily than the salts of aluminium. the most familiar ferric salts are the chloride and the sulphate. ~ferric chloride~ (fecl_{ }). this salt can be obtained most conveniently by dissolving iron in hydrochloric acid and then passing chlorine into the solution: fe + hcl = fecl_{ } + h, fecl_{ } + cl = fecl_{ }. when the pure salt is heated with water it is partly hydrolyzed: fecl_{ } + h_{ }o <--> fe(oh)_{ } + hcl. this is a reversible reaction, however, and hydrolysis can therefore be prevented by first adding a considerable amount of the soluble product of the reaction, namely, hydrochloric acid. ~ferric sulphate~ (fe_{ }(so_{ })_{ }). this compound can be made by treating an acid solution of green vitriol with an oxidizing agent. it is difficult to crystallize and hard to obtain in pure condition. when an alkali sulphate in proper quantity is added to ferric sulphate in solution an iron alum is formed, and is easily obtained in large crystals. the best known iron alums have the formulas kfe(so_{ })_{ }· h_{ }o and nh_{ }fe(so_{ })_{ }· h_{ }o. they are commonly used when a pure ferric salt is required. ~ferric hydroxide~ (fe(oh)_{ }). when solutions of ferric salts are treated with ammonium hydroxide, ferric hydroxide is formed as a rusty-red precipitate, insoluble in water. ~iron cyanides.~ a large number of complex cyanides containing iron are known, the most important being potassium ferrocyanide, or yellow prussiate of potash (k_{ }fec_{ }n_{ }), and potassium ferricyanide, or red prussiate of potash (k_{ }fec_{ }n_{ }). these compounds are the potassium salts of the complex acids of the formulas h_{ }fec_{ }n_{ } and h_{ }fec_{ }n_{ }. ~oxidation of ferrous salts.~ it has just been seen that when a ferrous salt is treated with an oxidizing agent in the presence of a free acid a ferric salt is formed: feso_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } + o = fe_{ }(so_{ })_{ } + h_{ }o. in this reaction oxygen is used up, and the valence of the iron is changed from to . the same equation may be written fe^{++}, so_{ }^{--} + h^{+}, so_{ }^{--} + o = fe^{+++}, so_{ }^{--} + h_{ }o. hydrogen ions have been oxidized to water, while the charge of each iron ion has been increased from to . in a similar way the conversion of ferrous chloride into ferric chloride may be written fe^{++}, cl^{-} + cl = fe^{+++}, + cl^{-}. here again the valence of the iron and the charge on the iron ion has been increased from to , though no oxygen has entered into the reaction. as a rule, however, changes of this kind are brought about by the use of an oxidizing agent, and are called oxidations. the term "oxidation" is applied to all reactions in which the valence of the metal of a compound is increased, or, in other words, to all reactions in which the charge of a cation is increased. ~reduction of ferric salts.~ the changes which take place when a ferric salt is converted into a ferrous salt are the reverse of the ones just described. this is seen in the equation fecl_{ } + h = fecl_{ } + hcl in this reaction the valence of the iron has been changed from to . the same equation may be written fe^{+++}, cl_{-} + h = fe^{++}, + h^{+} + cl_{-} it will be seen that the charge of the iron ions has been diminished from to . since these changes are the reverse of the oxidation changes just considered, they are called reduction reactions. the term "reduction" is applied to all processes in which the valence of the metal of a compound is diminished, or, in other words, to all processes in which the charge on the cations is diminished. nickel and cobalt these elements occur sparingly in nature, usually combined with arsenic or with arsenic and sulphur. both elements have been found in the free state in meteorites. like iron they form two series of compounds, but the salts corresponding to the ferrous salts are the most common, the ones corresponding to the ferric salts being difficult to obtain. thus we have the chlorides nicl_{ }· h_{ }o and cocl_{ }· h_{ }o; the sulphates niso_{ }· h_{ }o and coso_{ }· h_{ }o; the nitrates ni(no_{ })_{ }· h_{ }o and co(no_{ })_{ }· h_{ }o. nickel is largely used as an alloy with other metals. alloyed with copper it forms coin metal from which five-cent pieces are made, with copper and zinc it forms german silver, and when added to steel in small quantities nickel steel is formed which is much superior to common steel for certain purposes. when deposited by electrolysis upon the surface of other metals such as iron, it forms a covering which will take a high polish and protects the metal from rust, nickel not being acted upon by moist air. salts of nickel are usually green. compounds of cobalt fused with glass give it an intensely blue color. in powdered form such glass is sometimes used as a pigment called smalt. cobalt salts, which contain water of crystallization, are usually cherry red in color; when dehydrated they become blue. exercises . in the manufacture of cast iron, why is the air heated before being forced into the furnace? . write the equations showing how each of the following compounds of iron could be obtained from the metal itself: ferrous chloride, ferrous hydroxide, ferrous sulphate, ferrous sulphide, ferrous carbonate, ferric chloride, ferric sulphate, ferric hydroxide. . account for the fact that a solution of sodium carbonate, when added to a solution of a ferric salt, precipitates an hydroxide and not a carbonate. . calculate the percentage of iron in each of the common iron ores. . one ton of steel prepared by the bessemer process is found by analysis to contain . % carbon. what is the minimum weight of carbon which must be added in order that the steel may be made to take a temper? chapter xxviii copper, mercury, and silver ================================================================== | | | | | | | | | | formulas of oxides | symbol | atomic | density | melting |___________________ | | weight | | point | | | | | | | "ous" | "ic" ________|________|________|_________|_________|__________|________ | | | | | | copper | cu | . | . | ° | cu_{ }o | cuo mercury | hg | . | . | - . ° | hg_{ }o | hgo silver | ag | . | . | ° | ag_{ }o | ago ================================================================== ~the family.~ by referring to the periodic arrangement of the elements (page ), it will be seen that mercury is not included in the same family with copper and silver. since the metallurgy of the three elements is so similar, however, and since they resemble each other so closely in chemical properties, it is convenient to class them together for study. . _occurrence._ the three elements occur in nature to some extent in the free state, but are usually found as sulphides. their ores are easy to reduce. . _properties._ they are heavy metals of high luster and are especially good conductors of heat and electricity. they are not very active chemically. neither hydrochloric nor dilute sulphuric acid has any appreciable action upon them. concentrated sulphuric acid attacks all three, forming metallic sulphates and evolving sulphur dioxide, while nitric acid, both dilute and concentrated, converts them into nitrates with the evolution of oxides of nitrogen. . _two series of salts._ copper and mercury form oxides of the types m_{ }o and mo, as well as two series of salts. in one series the metals are univalent and the salts have formulas like those of the sodium salts. they are called cuprous and mercurous salts. in the other series the metals are divalent and resemble magnesium salts in formulas. these are called cupric and mercuric salts. silver forms only one series of salts, being always a univalent metal. copper ~occurrence.~ the element copper has been used for various purposes since the earliest days of history. it is often found in the metallic state in nature, large masses of it occurring pure in the lake superior region and in other places to a smaller extent. the most valuable ores are the following: cuprite cu_{ }o. chalcocite cu_{ }s. chalcopyrite cufes_{ }. bornite cu_{ }fes_{ }. malachite cuco_{ }·cu(oh)_{ }. azurite cuco_{ }·cu(oh)_{ }. ~metallurgy of copper.~ ores containing little or no sulphur are easy to reduce. they are first crushed and the earthy impurities washed away. the concentrated ore is then mixed with carbon and heated in a furnace, metallic copper resulting from the reduction of the copper oxide by the hot carbon. ~metallurgy of sulphide ores.~ much of the copper of commerce is made from chalcopyrite and bornite, and these ores are more difficult to work. they are first roasted in the air, by which treatment much of the sulphur is burned to sulphur dioxide. the roasted ore is then melted in a small blast furnace or in an open one like a puddling furnace. in melting, part of the iron combines with silica to form a slag of iron silicate. the product, called crude matte, contains about % copper together with sulphur and iron. further purification is commonly carried on by a process very similar to the bessemer process for steel. the converter is lined with silica, and a charge of matte from the melting furnace, together with sand, is introduced, and air is blown into the mass. by this means the sulphur is practically all burned out by the air, and the remaining iron combines with silica and goes off as slag. the copper is poured out of the converter and molded into anode plates for refining. ~refining of copper.~ impure copper is purified by electrolysis. a large plate of it, serving as an anode, is suspended in a tank facing a thin plate of pure copper, which is the cathode. the tank is filled with a solution of copper sulphate and sulphuric acid to serve as the electrolyte. a current from a dynamo passes from the anode to the cathode, and the copper, dissolving from the anode, is deposited upon the cathode in pure form, while the impurities collect on the bottom of the tank. electrolytic copper is one of the purest of commercial metals and is very nearly pure copper. ~recovery of gold and silver.~ gold and silver are often present in small quantities in copper ores, and in electrolytic refining these metals collect in the muddy deposit on the bottom of the tank. the mud is carefully worked over from time to time and the precious metals extracted from it. a surprising amount of gold and silver is obtained in this way. ~properties of copper.~ copper is a rather heavy metal of density . , and has a characteristic reddish color. it is rather soft and is very malleable, ductile, and flexible, yet tough and strong; it melts at °. as a conductor of heat and electrical energy it is second only to silver. hydrochloric acid, dilute sulphuric acid, and fused alkalis are almost without action upon it; nitric acid and hot, concentrated sulphuric acid, however, readily dissolve it. in moist air it slowly becomes covered with a thin layer of green basic carbonate; heated in the air it is easily oxidized to black copper oxide (cuo). ~uses.~ copper is extensively used for electrical purposes, for roofs and cornices, for sheathing the bottom of ships, and for making alloys. in the following table the composition of some of these alloys is indicated: composition of alloys of copper in percentages aluminium bronze copper ( to %), aluminium ( to %). brass copper ( to %), zinc ( to %). bronze copper ( to %), zinc ( to %), tin ( to %). german silver copper ( to %), zinc ( %), nickel ( to %). gold coin copper ( %), gold ( %). gun metal copper ( %), tin ( %). nickel coin copper ( %), nickel ( %) silver coin copper ( %), silver ( %). ~electrotyping.~ matter is often printed from electrotype plates which are prepared as follows. the matter is set up in type and wax is firmly pressed down upon the face of it until a clear impression is obtained. the impressed side of the wax is coated with graphite and the impression is made the cathode in an electrolytic cell containing a copper salt in solution. when connected with a current the copper is deposited as a thin sheet upon the letters in wax, and when detached is a perfect copy of the type, the under part of the letters being hollow. the sheet is strengthened by pouring on the under surface a suitable amount of molten metal (commercial lead is used). the sheet so strengthened is then used in printing. ~two series of copper compounds.~ copper, like iron, forms two series of compounds: in the cuprous compounds it is univalent; in the cupric it is divalent. the cupric salts are much the more common of the two, since the cuprous salts pass readily into cupric by oxidation. ~cuprous compounds.~ the most important cuprous compound is the oxide (cu_{ }o), which occurs in nature as ruby copper or cuprite. it is a bright red substance and can easily be prepared by heating copper to a high temperature in a limited supply of air. it is used for imparting a ruby color to glass. by treating cuprous oxide with different acids a number of cuprous salts can be made. many of these are insoluble in water, the chloride (cucl) being the best known. when suspended in dilute hydrochloric acid it is changed into cupric chloride, the oxygen taking part in the reaction being absorbed from the air: cucl + hcl + o = cucl_{ } + h_{ }o. ~cupric compounds.~ cupric salts are easily made by dissolving cupric oxide in acids, or, when insoluble, by precipitation. most of them are blue or green in color, and the soluble ones crystallize well. since they are so much more familiar than the cuprous salts, they are frequently called merely copper salts. ~cupric oxide~ (cuo). this is a black insoluble substance obtained by heating copper in excess of air, or by igniting the hydroxide or nitrate. it is used as an oxidizing agent. ~cupric hydroxide~ (cu(oh)_{ }). the hydroxide prepared by treating a solution of a copper salt with sodium hydroxide is a light blue insoluble substance which easily loses water and changes into the oxide. heat applied to the liquid containing the hydroxide suspended in it serves to bring about the reaction represented by the equation cu(oh)_{ } = cuo + h_{ }o. ~cupric sulphate~ (_blue vitriol_) (cuso_{ }· h_{ }o). this substance, called blue vitriol or bluestone, is obtained as a by-product in a number of processes and is produced in very large quantities. it forms large blue crystals, which lose water when heated and crumble to a white powder. the salt finds many uses, especially in electrotyping and in making electrical batteries. ~cupric sulphide~ (cus). the insoluble black sulphide (cus) is easily prepared by the action of hydrosulphuric acid upon a solution of a copper salt: cuso_{ } + h_{ }s = cus + h_{ }so_{ }. it is insoluble in water and dilute acids. mercury ~occurrence.~ mercury occurs in nature chiefly as the sulphide (hgs) called cinnabar, and in globules of metal inclosed in the cinnabar. the mercury mines of spain have long been famous, california being the next largest producer. ~metallurgy.~ mercury is a volatile metal which has but little affinity for oxygen. sulphur, on the other hand, readily combines with oxygen. these facts make the metallurgy of mercury very simple. the crushed ore, mixed with a small amount of carbon to reduce any oxide or sulphate that might be formed, is roasted in a current of air. the sulphur burns to sulphur dioxide, while the mercury is converted into vapor and is condensed in a series of condensing vessels. the metal is purified by distillation. ~properties.~ mercury is a heavy silvery liquid with a density of . . it boils at ° and solidifies at - . °. small quantities of many metals dissolve in it, forming liquid alloys, while with larger quantities it forms solid alloys. the alloys of mercury are called amalgams. toward acids mercury conducts itself very much like copper; it is easily attacked by nitric and hot, concentrated sulphuric acids, while cold sulphuric and hydrochloric acids have no effect on it. ~uses.~ mercury is extensively used in the construction of scientific instruments, such as the thermometer and barometer, and as a liquid over which to collect gases which are soluble in water. the readiness with which it alloys with silver and gold makes it very useful in the extraction of these elements. ~compounds of mercury.~ like copper, mercury forms two series of compounds: the mercurous, of which mercurous chloride (hgcl) is an example; and the mercuric, represented by mercuric chloride (hgcl_{ }). ~mercuric oxide~ (hgo). mercuric oxide can be obtained either as a brick-red or as a yellow substance. when mercuric nitrate is heated carefully the red modification is formed in accordance with the equation hg(no_{ })_{ } = hgo + no_{ } + o. the yellow modification is prepared by adding a solution of a mercuric salt to a solution of sodium or potassium hydroxide: hg(no_{ })_{ } + naoh = nano_{ } + hg(oh)_{ }, hg(oh)_{ } = hgo + h_{ }o. when heated the oxide darkens until it becomes almost black; at a higher temperature it decomposes into mercury and oxygen. it was by this reaction that oxygen was discovered. ~mercurous chloride~ (_calomel_) (hgcl). being insoluble, mercurous chloride is precipitated as a white solid when a soluble chloride is added to a solution of mercurous nitrate: hgno_{ } + nacl = hgcl + nano_{ }. commercially it is manufactured by heating a mixture of mercuric chloride and mercury. when exposed to the light it slowly changes into mercuric chloride and mercury: hgcl = hgcl_{ } + hg. it is therefore protected from the light by the use of colored bottles. it is used in medicine. most mercurous salts are insoluble in water, the principal soluble one being the nitrate, which is made by the action of cold, dilute nitric acid on mercury. ~mercuric chloride~ (_corrosive sublimate_) (hgcl_{ }). this substance can be made by dissolving mercuric oxide in hydrochloric acid. on a commercial scale it is made by subliming a mixture of common salt and mercuric sulphate: nacl + hgso_{ } = hgcl_{ } + na_{ }so_{ }. the mercuric chloride, being readily volatile, vaporizes and is condensed again in cool vessels. like mercurous chloride it is a white solid, but differs from it in that it is soluble in water. it is extremely poisonous and in dilute solutions is used as an antiseptic in dressing wounds. ~mercuric sulphide~ (hgs). as cinnabar this substance forms the chief native compound of mercury, occurring in red crystalline masses. by passing hydrosulphuric acid into a solution of a mercuric salt it is precipitated as a black powder, insoluble in water and acids. by other means it can be prepared as a brilliant red powder known as vermilion, which is used as a pigment in fine paints. ~the iodides of mercury.~ if a solution of potassium iodide is added to solutions of a mercurous and a mercuric salt respectively, the corresponding iodides are precipitated. mercuric iodide is the more important of the two, and as prepared above is a red powder which changes to yellow on heating to °. the yellow form on cooling changes back again to the red form, or may be made to do so by rubbing it with a knife blade or some other hard object. silver ~occurrence.~ silver is found in small quantities in the uncombined state; usually, however, it occurs in combination with sulphur, either as the sulphide (ag_{ }s) or as a small constituent of other sulphides, especially those of lead and copper. it is also found alloyed with gold. ~metallurgy.~ _parkes's process._ silver is usually smelted in connection with lead. the ores are worked over together, as described under lead, and the lead and silver obtained as an alloy, the silver being present in small quantity. the alloy is melted and metallic zinc is stirred in. zinc will alloy with silver but not with lead, and it is found that the silver leaves the lead and, in the form of an alloy with zinc, forms as a crust upon the lead and is skimmed off. this crust, which, of course, contains lead adhering to it, is partially melted and the most of the lead drained off. the zinc is removed by distillation, and the residue is melted on an open hearth in a current of air; by this means the zinc and lead remaining with the silver are changed into oxides and the silver remains behind unaltered. ~amalgamation process.~ in some localities the old amalgamation process is used. the silver ore is treated with common salt and ferrous compounds, which process converts the silver first into chloride and then into metallic silver. mercury is then added and thoroughly mixed with the mass, forming an amalgam with the silver. after some days the earthy materials are washed away and the heavier amalgam is recovered. the mercury is distilled off and the silver left in impure form. ~refining silver.~ the silver obtained by either of the above processes may still contain copper, gold, and iron, and is refined by "parting" with sulphuric acid. the metal is heated with strong sulphuric acid which dissolves the silver, copper, and iron present, but not the gold. in the solution of silver sulphate so obtained copper plates are suspended, upon which the pure silver precipitates, the copper going into solution as sulphate, as shown in the equation ag_{ }so_{ } + cu = ag + cuso_{ }. the solution obtained as a by-product in this process furnishes most of the blue vitriol of commerce. silver is also refined by electrolytic methods similar to those used in refining copper. ~properties of silver.~ silver is a heavy, rather soft, white metal, very ductile and malleable and capable of taking a high polish. it surpasses all other metals as a conductor of heat and electricity, but is too costly to find extensive use for such purposes. it melts at a little lower temperature than copper ( °). it alloys readily with other heavy metals, and when it is to be used for coinage a small amount of copper--from to %--is nearly always melted with it to give it hardness. it is not acted upon by water or air, but is quickly tarnished when in contact with sulphur compounds, turning quite black in time. hydrochloric acid and fused alkalis do not act upon it, but nitric acid and hot, concentrated sulphuric acid dissolve it with ease. [illustration: fig. ] ~electroplating.~ since silver is not acted upon by water or air, and has a pleasing appearance, it is used to coat various articles made of cheaper metals. such articles are said to be silver plated. the process by which this is done is called electroplating. it is carried on as follows: the object to be plated (such as a spoon) is attached to a wire and dipped into a solution of a silver salt. electrical connection is made in such a way that the article to be plated serves as the cathode, while the anode is made up of one or more plates of silver (fig. , a). when a current is passed through the electrolyte silver dissolves from the anode plate and deposits on the cathode in the form of a closely adhering layer. by making the proper change in the electrolyte and anode plate objects may be plated with gold and other metals. ~compounds of silver.~ silver forms two oxides but only one series of salts, namely, the one which corresponds to the mercurous and cuprous series. ~silver nitrate~ (_lunar caustic_) (agno_{ }). this salt is easily prepared by dissolving silver in nitric acid and evaporating the resulting solution. it crystallizes in flat plates, and when heated carefully can be melted without decomposition. when cast into sticks it is called lunar caustic, for it has a very corrosive action on flesh, and is sometimes used in surgery to burn away abnormal growths. the alchemists designated the metals by the names of the heavenly bodies. the moon (luna) was the symbol for silver; hence the name "lunar caustic." ~silver sulphide~ (ag_{ }s). this occurs in nature and constitutes one of the principal ores of silver. it can be obtained in the form of a black solid by passing hydrosulphuric acid through a solution of silver nitrate. ~compounds of silver with the halogens.~ the chloride, bromide, and iodide of silver are insoluble in water and acids, and are therefore precipitated by bringing together a soluble halogen salt with silver nitrate: agno_{ } + kcl = agcl + kno_{ }. they are remarkable for the fact that they are very sensitive to the action of light, undergoing a change of color and chemical composition when exposed to sunlight, especially if in contact with organic matter such as gelatin. ~photography.~ the art of photography is based on the fact that the halogen compounds of silver are affected by the light, particularly in the presence of organic matter. from a chemical standpoint the processes involved may be described under two heads: ( ) the preparation of the negative; ( ) the preparation of the print. . _preparation of the negative._ the plate used in the preparation of the negative is made by spreading a thin layer of gelatin, in which silver bromide is suspended (silver iodide is sometimes added also), over a glass plate or celluloid film and allowing it to dry. when the plate so prepared is placed in a camera and the image of some object is focused upon it, the silver salt undergoes a change which is proportional at each point to the intensity of the light falling upon it. in this way an image of the object photographed is produced upon the plate, which is, however, invisible and is therefore called "latent." it can be made visible by the process of developing. to develop the image the exposed plate is immersed in a solution of some reducing agent called the developer. the developer reduces that portion of the silver salt which has been affected by the light, depositing it in the form of black metallic silver which closely adheres to the plate. the unaffected silver salt, upon which the developer has no action, must now be removed from the plate. this is done by immersing the plate in a solution of sodium thiosulphate (hypo). after the silver salt has been dissolved off, the plate is washed with water and dried. the plate so prepared is called the negative because it is a picture of the object photographed, with the lights exactly reversed. this is called fixing the negative. . _preparation of the print._ the print is made from paper which is prepared in the same way as the negative plate. the negative is placed upon this paper and exposed to the light in such a way that the light must pass through the negative before striking the paper. if the paper is coated with silver chloride, a visible image is produced, in which case a developer is not needed. the proofs are made in this way. in order to make them permanent the unchanged silver chloride must be dissolved off with sodium thiosulphate. the print is then toned by dipping it into a solution of gold or platinum salts. the silver on the print passes into solution, while the gold or platinum takes its place. these metals give a characteristic color or tone to the print, the gold making it reddish brown, while the platinum gives it a steel-gray tone. if a silver bromide paper is used in making the print, a latent image is produced which must be developed as in the case of the negative itself. the silver bromide is much more sensitive than the chloride, so that the printing can be done in artificial light. since the darkest places on the negative cut off the most light, it is evident that the lights of the print will be the reverse of those of the negative, and will therefore correspond to those of the object photographed. the print is therefore called the positive. exercises . account for the fact that copper has been used for so long a time. . write equations for the action of concentrated sulphuric and nitric acids upon the metals of this family. . how would you account for the fact that normal copper sulphate is slightly acid to litmus? . contrast the action of heat on cupric nitrate and mercuric nitrate. . state reasons why mercury is adapted for use in thermometers and barometers. . how could you distinguish between mercurous chloride and mercuric chloride? . write equations for the preparation of mercuric and mercurous iodides. . how would you account for the fact that solutions of the different salts of a metal usually have the same color? . crude silver usually contains iron and lead. what would become of these metals in refining by parting with sulphuric acid? . in the amalgamation process for extracting silver, how does ferrous chloride convert silver chloride into silver? write equation. why is the silver sulphide first changed into silver chloride? . what impurities would you expect to find in the copper sulphate prepared from the refining of silver? . how could you prepare pure silver chloride from a silver coin? . mercuric nitrate and silver nitrate are both white solids soluble in water. how could you distinguish between them? . account for the fact that sulphur waters turn a silver coin black; also for the fact that a silver spoon is blackened by foods (eggs, for example) containing sulphur. . when a solution of silver nitrate is added to a solution of potassium chlorate no precipitate forms. how do you account for the fact that a precipitate of silver chloride is not formed? chapter xxix tin and lead ==================================================================== | | | | | | symbol | atomic | density | melting | common oxides | | weight | | point | _____|________|________|_________|_________|________________________ | | | | | tin | sn | . | . | ° | sno sno_{ } lead | pb | . | . | ° | pbo pb_{ }o_{ } pbo_{ } ==================================================================== ~the family.~ tin and lead, together with silicon and germanium, form a family in group iv of the periodic table. silicon has been discussed along with the non-metals, while germanium, on account of its rarity, needs only to be mentioned. the other family of group iv includes carbon, already described, and a number of rare elements. tin ~occurrence.~ tin is found in nature chiefly as the oxide (sno_{ }), called cassiterite or tinstone. the most famous mines are those of cornwall in england, and of the malay peninsula and east india islands; in small amounts tinstone is found in many other localities. ~metallurgy.~ the metallurgy of tin is very simple. the ore, separated as far as possible from earthy materials, is mixed with carbon and heated in a furnace, the reduction taking place readily. the equation is sno_{ } + c = sn + co_{ }. the metal is often purified by carefully heating it until it is partly melted; the pure tin melts first and can be drained away from the impurities. ~properties.~ pure tin, called block tin, is a soft white metal with a silver-like appearance and luster; it melts readily ( °) and is somewhat lighter than copper, having a density of . . it is quite malleable and can be rolled out into very thin sheets, forming tin foil; most tin foil, however, contains a good deal of lead. under ordinary conditions it is quite unchanged by air or moisture, but at a high temperature it burns in air, forming the oxide sno_{ }. dilute acids have no effect upon it, but concentrated acids attack it readily. concentrated hydrochloric acid changes it into the chloride sn + hcl = sncl_{ } + h. with sulphuric acid tin sulphate and sulphur dioxide are formed: sn + h_{ }so_{ } = snso_{ } + so_{ } + h_{ }o concentrated nitric acid oxidizes it, forming a white insoluble compound of the formula h_{ }sno_{ }, called metastannic acid: sn + hno_{ } + h_{ }o = h_{ }sno_{ } + no. ~uses of tin.~ a great deal of tin is made into tin plate by dipping thin steel sheets into the melted metal. owing to the way in which tin resists the action of air and dilute acids, tin plate is used in many ways, such as in roofing, and in the manufacture of tin cans, cooking vessels, and similar articles. many useful alloys contain tin, some of which have been mentioned in connection with copper. when tin is alloyed with other metals of low melting point, soft, easily melted alloys are formed which are used for friction bearings in machinery; tin, antimony, lead, and bismuth are the chief constituents of these alloys. pewter and soft solder are alloys of tin and lead. ~compounds of tin.~ tin forms two series of compounds: the stannous, in which the tin is divalent, illustrated in the compounds sno, sns, sncl_{ }; the stannic, in which it is tetravalent as shown in the compounds sno_{ }, sns_{ }. there is also an acid, h_{ }sno_{ }, called stannic acid, which forms a series of salts called stannates. while this acid has the same composition as metastannic acid, the two are quite different in their chemical properties. this difference is probably due to the different arrangement of the atoms in the molecules of the two substances. only a few compounds of tin need be mentioned. ~stannic oxide~ (sno_{ }). stannic oxide is of interest, since it is the chief compound of tin found in nature. it is sometimes found in good-sized crystals, but as prepared in the laboratory is a white powder. when fused with potassium hydroxide it forms potassium stannate, acting very much like silicon dioxide: sno_{ } + koh = k_{ }sno_{ } + h_{ }o. ~chlorides of tin.~ stannous chloride is prepared by dissolving tin in concentrated hydrochloric acid and evaporating the solution to crystallization. the crystals which are obtained have the composition sncl_{ }· h_{ }o, and are known as tin crystals. by treating a solution of stannous chloride with aqua regia, stannic chloride is formed: sncl_{ } + cl = sncl_{ }. the salt which crystallizes from such a solution has the composition sncl_{ }· h_{ }o, and is known commercially as oxymuriate of tin. if metallic tin is heated in a current of dry chlorine, the anhydrous chloride (sncl_{ }) is obtained as a heavy colorless liquid which fumes strongly on exposure to air. the ease with which stannous chloride takes up chlorine to form stannic chloride makes it a good reducing agent in many reactions, changing the higher chlorides of metals to lower ones. thus mercuric chloride is changed into mercurous chloride: sncl_{ } + hgcl_{ } = sncl_{ } + hgcl. if the stannous chloride is in excess, the reaction may go further, producing metallic mercury: sncl_{ } + hgcl = sncl_{ } + hg. ferric chloride is in like manner reduced to ferrous chloride: sncl_{ } + fecl_{ } = sncl_{ } + fecl_{ }. the chlorides of tin, as well as the alkali stannates, are much used as mordants in dyeing processes. the hydroxides of tin and free stannic acid, which are easily liberated from these compounds, possess in very marked degree the power of fixing dyes upon fibers, as explained under aluminium. lead ~occurrence.~ lead is found in nature chiefly as the sulphide (pbs), called galena; to a much smaller extent it occurs as carbonate, sulphate, chromate, and in a few other forms. practically all the lead of commerce is made from galena, two general methods of metallurgy being in use. ~metallurgy.~ . the sulphide is melted with scrap iron, when iron sulphide and metallic lead are formed; the liquid lead, being the heavier, sinks to the bottom of the vessel and can be drawn off: pbs + fe = pb + fes. . the sulphide is roasted in the air until a part of it has been changed into oxide and sulphate. the air is then shut off and the heating continued, the reactions indicated in the following equations taking place: pbo + pbs = pb + so_{ }, pbso_{ } + pbs = pb + so_{ }. the lead so prepared usually contains small amounts of silver, arsenic, antimony, copper, and other metals. the silver is removed by parkes's method, as described under silver, and the other metals in various ways. the lead of commerce is one of the purest commercial metals, containing as a rule only a few tenths per cent of impurities. ~properties.~ lead is a heavy metal (den. = . ) which has a brilliant silvery luster on a freshly cut surface, but which soon tarnishes to a dull blue-gray color. it is soft, easily fused (melting at °), and quite malleable, but has little toughness or strength. it is not acted upon to any great extent by the oxygen of the air under ordinary conditions, but is changed into oxide at a high temperature. with the exception of hydrochloric and sulphuric acids, most acids, even very weak ones, act upon it, forming soluble lead salts. hot, concentrated hydrochloric and sulphuric acids also attack it to a slight extent. ~uses.~ lead is employed in the manufacture of lead pipes and in large storage batteries. in the form of sheet lead it is used in lining the chambers of sulphuric acid works and in the preparation of paint pigments. some alloys of lead, such as solder and pewter (lead and tin), shot (lead and arsenic), and soft bearing metals, are widely used. type metal consists of lead, antimony, and sometimes tin. compounds of lead form several important pigments. ~compounds of lead.~ in nearly all its compounds lead has a valence of , but a few corresponding to stannic compounds have a valence of . ~lead oxides.~ lead forms a number of oxides, the most important of which are litharge, red lead or minium, and lead peroxide. . _litharge_ (pbo). this oxide forms when lead is oxidized at a rather low temperature, and is obtained as a by-product in silver refining. it is a pale yellow powder, and has a number of commercial uses. it is easily soluble in nitric acid: pbo + hno_{ } = pb(no_{ })_{ } + h_{ }o. . _red lead, or minium_ (pb_{ }o_{ }). minium is prepared by heating lead (or litharge) to a high temperature in the air. it is a heavy powder of a beautiful red color, and is much used as a pigment. . _lead peroxide_ (pbo_{ }). this is left as a residue when minium is heated with nitric acid: pb_{ }o_{ } + hno_{ } = pb(no_{ })_{ } + pbo_{ } + h_{ }o. it is a brown powder which easily gives up a part of its oxygen and, like manganese dioxide and barium dioxide, is a good oxidizing agent. ~soluble salts of lead.~ the soluble salts of lead can be made by dissolving (pb(c_{ }h_{ }o_{ })_{ }· h_{ }o), litharge in acids. lead acetate called sugar of lead, and lead nitrate (pb(no_{ })_{ }) are the most familiar examples. they are while crystalline solids and are poisonous in character. ~insoluble salts of lead; lead carbonate.~ while the normal carbonate of lead (pbco_{ }) is found to some extent, in nature and can be prepared in the laboratory, basic carbonates of varying composition are much more easy to obtain. one of the simplest of these has the composition pbco_{ }·pb(oh)_{ }. a mixture of such carbonates is called white lead. this is prepared on a large scale as a paint pigment and as a body for paints which are to be colored with other substances. ~white lead.~ white lead is an amorphous white substance which, when mixed with oil, has great covering power, that is, it spreads out in an even waxy film, free from streaks and lumps, and covers the entire surface upon which it is spread. its disadvantage as a pigment lies in the fact that it gradually blackens when exposed to sulphur compounds, which are often present in the air, forming black lead sulphide (pbs). ~technical preparation of white lead.~ different methods are used in the preparation of white lead, but the old one known as the dutch process is still the principal one employed. in this process, earthenware pots about ten inches high and of the shape shown in fig. are used. in the bottom a is placed a % solution of acetic acid (vinegar answers the purpose very well). the space above this is filled with thin, perforated, circular pieces of lead, supported by the flange b of the pot. these pots are placed close together on a bed of tan bark on the floor of a room known as the corroding room. they are covered over with boards, upon which tan bark is placed, and another row of pots is placed on this. in this way the room is filled. the white lead is formed by the fumes of the acetic acid, together with the carbon dioxide set free in the fermentation of the tan bark acting on the lead. about three months are required to complete the process. [illustration : fig. ] ~lead sulphide~ (pbs). in nature this compound occurs in highly crystalline condition, the crystals having much the same luster as pure lead. it is readily prepared in the laboratory as a black precipitate, by the action of hydrosulphuric acid upon soluble lead salts: pb(no_{ })_{ } + h_{ }s = pbs + hno_{ }. it is insoluble both in water and in dilute acids. ~other insoluble salts.~ lead chromate (pbcro_{ }) is a yellow substance produced by the action of a soluble lead salt upon a soluble chromate, thus: k_{ }cro_{ } + pb(no_{ })_{ } = pbcro_{ } + kno_{ }. it is used as a yellow pigment. lead sulphate (pbso_{ }) is a white substance sometimes found in nature and easily prepared by precipitation. lead chloride (pbcl_{ }) is likewise a white substance nearly insoluble in cold water, but readily soluble in boiling water. ~thorium and cerium.~ these elements are found in a few rare minerals, especially in the monazite sand of the carolinas and brazil. the oxides of these elements are used in the preparation of the welsbach mantles for gas lights, because of the intense light given out when a mixture of the oxides is heated. these mantles contain the oxides of cerium and thorium in the ratio of about % of the former to % of the latter. compounds of thorium, like those of radium, are found to possess radio-activity, but in a less degree. exercises . how could you detect lead if present in tin foil? . stannous chloride reduces gold chloride (aucl_{ }) to gold. give equation. . what are the products of hydrolysis when stannic chloride is used as a mordant? . how could you detect arsenic, antimony, or copper in lead? . why is lead so extensively used for making water pipes? . what sulphates other than lead are insoluble? . could lead nitrate be used in place of barium chloride in testing for sulphates? . how much lead peroxide could be obtained from kg. of minium? . the purity of white lead is usually determined by observing the volume of carbon dioxide given off when it is treated with an acid. what acid should be used? on the supposition that it has the formula pbco_{ }·pb(oh)_{ }, how nearly pure was a sample if g. gave cc. of carbon dioxide at ° and mm.? . silicon belongs in the same family with tin and lead. in what respects are these elements similar? . what weight of tin could be obtained by the reduction of ton of cassiterite? . what reaction would you expect to take place when lead peroxide is treated with hydrochloric acid? . white lead is often adulterated with barytes. suggest a method for detecting it, if present, in a given example of white lead. chapter xxx manganese and chromium ==================================================================== | | | | | | symbol | atomic | density | melting | formulas of acids | | weight | | point | __________|________|________|_________|_________|___________________ | | | | | manganese | mn | . | . | ° | h_{ }mno_{ } and | | | | | hmno_{ } chromium | cr | . | . | ° | h_{ }cro_{ } and | | | | | h_{ }cr_{ }o_{ } ==================================================================== ~general.~ manganese and chromium, while belonging to different families, have so many features in common in their chemical conduct that they may be studied together with advantage. they differ from most of the elements so far studied in that they can act either as acid-forming or base-forming elements. as base-forming elements each of the metals forms two series of salts. in the one series, designated by the suffix "ous," the metal is divalent; in the other series, designated by the suffix "ic," the metal is trivalent. only the manganous and the chromic salts, however, are of importance. the acids in which these elements play the part of a non-metal are unstable, but their salts are usually stable, and some of them are important compounds. manganese ~occurrence.~ manganese is found in nature chiefly as the dioxide mno_{ }, called pyrolusite. in smaller amounts it occurs as the oxides mn_{ }o_{ } and mn_{ }o_{ }, and as the carbonate mnco_{ }. some iron ores also contain manganese. ~preparation and properties.~ the element is difficult to prepare in pure condition and has no commercial applications. it can be prepared, however, by reducing the oxide with aluminium powder or by the use of the electric furnace, with carbon as the reducing agent. the metal somewhat resembles iron in appearance, but is harder, less fusible, and more readily acted upon by air and moisture. acids readily dissolve it, forming manganous salts. ~oxides of manganese.~ the following oxides of manganese are known: mno, mn_{ }o_{ }, mn_{ }o_{ }, mno_{ }, and mn_{ }o_{ }. only one of these, the dioxide, needs special mention. ~manganese dioxide~ (_pyrolusite_) (mno_{ }). this substance is the most abundant manganese compound found in nature, and is the ore from which all other compounds of manganese are made. it is a hard, brittle, black substance which is valuable as an oxidizing agent. it will be recalled that it is used in the preparation of chlorine and oxygen, in decolorizing glass which contains iron, and in the manufacture of ferromanganese. ~compounds containing manganese as a base-forming element.~ as has been stated previously, manganese forms two series of salts. the most important of these salts, all of which belong to the manganous series, are the following: manganous chloride mncl_{ }· h_{ }o. manganous sulphide mns. manganous sulphate mnso_{ }· h_{ }o. manganous carbonate mnco_{ }. manganous hydroxide mn(oh)_{ }. the chloride and sulphate may be prepared by heating the dioxide with hydrochloric and sulphuric acids respectively: mno_{ } + hcl = mncl_{ } + h_{ }o + cl, mno_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } = mnso_{ } + h_{ }o + o. the sulphide, carbonate, and hydroxide, being insoluble, may be prepared from a solution of the chloride or sulphate by precipitation with the appropriate reagents. most of the manganous salts are rose colored. they not only have formulas similar to the ferrous salts, but resemble them in many of their chemical properties. ~compounds containing manganese as an acid-forming element.~ manganese forms two unstable acids, namely, manganic acid and permanganic acid. while these acids are of little interest, some of their salts, especially the permanganates, are important compounds. ~manganic acid and manganates.~ when manganese dioxide is fused with an alkali and an oxidizing agent a green compound is formed. the equation, when caustic potash is used, is as follows: mno_{ } + koh + o = k_{ }mno_{ } + h_{ }o. the green compound (k_{ }mno_{ }) is called potassium manganate, and is a salt of the unstable manganic acid (h_{ }mno_{ }). the manganates are all very unstable. ~permanganic acid and the permanganates.~ when carbon dioxide is passed through a solution of a manganate a part of the manganese is changed into manganese dioxide, while the remainder forms a salt of the unstable acid hmno_{ }, called permanganic acid. the equation is k_{ }mno_{ } + co_{ } = mno_{ } + kmno_{ } + k_{ }co_{ }. potassium permanganate (kmno_{ }) crystallizes in purple-black needles and is very soluble in water, forming an intensely purple solution. all other permanganates, as well as permanganic acid itself, give solutions of the same color. ~oxidizing properties of the permanganates.~ the permanganates are remarkable for their strong oxidizing properties. when used as an oxidizing agent the permanganate is itself reduced, the exact character of the products formed from it depending upon whether the oxidation takes place ( ) in an alkaline or neutral solution, or ( ) in an acid solution. . _oxidation in alkaline or neutral solution._ when the solution is either alkaline or neutral the potassium and the manganese of the permanganate are both converted into hydroxides, as shown in the equation kmno_{ } + h_{ }o = mn(oh)_{ } + koh + o. . _oxidation in acid solution._ when free acid such as sulphuric is present, the potassium and the manganese are both changed into salts of the acid: kmno_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } = k_{ }so_{ } + mnso_{ } + h_{ }o + o. under ordinary conditions, however, neither one of these reactions takes place except in the presence of a third substance which is capable of oxidation. the oxygen is not given off in the free state, as the equations show, but is used up in effecting oxidation. potassium permanganate is particularly valuable as an oxidizing agent not only because it acts readily either in acid or in alkaline solution, but also because the reaction takes place so easily that often it is not even necessary to heat the solution to secure action. the substance finds many uses in the laboratory, especially in analytical work. it is also used as an antiseptic as well as a disinfectant. chromium ~occurrence.~ the ore from which all chromium compounds are made is chromite, or chrome iron ore (fecr_{ }o_{ }). this is found most abundantly in new caledonia and turkey. the element also occurs in small quantities in many other minerals, especially in crocoisite (pbcro_{ }), in which mineral it was first discovered. ~preparation.~ chromium, like manganese, is very hard to reduce from its ores, owing to its great affinity for oxygen. it can, however, be made by the same methods which have proved successful with manganese. considerable quantities of an alloy of chromium with iron, called ferrochromium, are now produced for the steel industry. ~properties.~ chromium is a very hard metal of about the same density as iron. it is one of the most infusible of the metals, requiring a temperature little short of ° for fusion. at ordinary temperatures air has little action on it; at higher temperatures, however, it burns brilliantly. nitric acid has no action on it, but hydrochloric and dilute sulphuric acids dissolve it, liberating hydrogen. ~compounds containing chromium as a base-forming element.~ while chromium forms two series of salts, chromous salts are difficult to prepare and are of little importance. the most important of the chromic series are the following: chromic hydroxide cr(oh)_{ }. chromic chloride crcl_{ }· h_{ }o. chromic sulphate cr_{ }(so_{ })_{ }. chrome alums ~chromic hydroxide~ (cr(oh)_{ }). this substance, being insoluble, can be obtained by precipitating a solution of the chloride or sulphate with a soluble hydroxide. it is a greenish substance which, like aluminium hydroxide, dissolves in alkalis, forming soluble salts. ~dehydration of chromium hydroxide.~ when heated gently chromic hydroxide loses a part of its oxygen and hydrogen, forming the substance cro·oh, which, like the corresponding aluminium compound, has more pronounced acid properties than the hydroxide. it forms a series of salts very similar to the spinels; chromite is the ferrous salt of this acid, having the formula fe(cro_{ })_{ }. when heated to a higher temperature chromic hydroxide is completely dehydrated, forming the trioxide cr_{ }o_{ }. this resembles the corresponding oxides of aluminium and iron in many respects. it is a bright green powder, and when ignited strongly becomes almost insoluble in acids, as is also the case with aluminium oxide. ~chromic sulphate~ (cr_{ }(so_{ })_{ }). this compound is a violet-colored solid which dissolves in water, forming a solution of the same color. this solution, however, turns green on heating, owing to the formation of basic salts. chromic sulphate, like ferric and aluminium sulphates, unites with the sulphates of the alkali metals to form alums, of which the best known are potassium chrome alum (kcr(so_{ })_{ }· h_{ }o) and ammonium chrome alum (nh_{ }cr(so_{ })_{ }· h_{ }o). these form beautiful dark purple crystals and have some practical uses in the tanning industry and in photography. a number of the salts of chromium are also used in the dyeing industry, for they hydrolyze like aluminium salts and the hydroxide forms a good mordant. ~hydrolysis of chromium salts.~ when ammonium sulphide is added to a solution of a chromium salt, such as the sulphate, chromium hydroxide precipitates instead of the sulphide. this is due to the fact that chromic sulphide, like aluminium sulphide, hydrolyzes in the presence of water, forming chromic hydroxide and hydrosulphuric acid. similarly, a soluble carbonate precipitates a basic carbonate of chromium. ~compounds containing chromium as an acid-forming element.~ like manganese, chromium forms two unstable acids, namely, chromic acid and dichromic acid. their salts, the chromates and dichromates, are important compounds. ~chromates.~ when a chromium compound is fused with an alkali and an oxidizing agent a chromate is produced. when potassium hydroxide is used as the alkali the equation is cr(oh)_{ } + koh + o = k_{ }cro_{ } + h_{ }o. this reaction recalls the formation of a manganate under similar conditions. ~properties of chromates.~ the chromates are salts of the unstable chromic acid (h_{ }cro_{ }), and as a rule are yellow in color. lead chromate (pbcro_{ }) is the well-known pigment chrome yellow. most of the chromates are insoluble and can therefore be prepared by precipitation. thus, when a solution of potassium chromate is added to solutions of lead nitrate and barium nitrate respectively, the reactions expressed by the following equations occur: pb(no_{ })_{ } + k_{ }cro_{ } = pbcro_{ } + kno_{ }, ba(no_{ })_{ } + k_{ }cro_{ } = bacro_{ } + kno_{ }. the chromates of lead and barium separate as yellow precipitates. the presence of either of these two metals can be detected by taking advantage of these reactions. ~dichromates.~ when potassium chromate is treated with an acid the potassium salt of the unstable dichromic acid (h_{ }cr_{ }o_{ }) is formed: k_{ }cro_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } = k_{ }cr_{ }o_{ } + k_{ }so_{ } + h_{ }o. the relation between the chromates and dichromates is the same as that between the phosphates and the pyrophosphates. potassium dichromate might therefore be called potassium pyrochromate. ~potassium dichromate~ (k_{ }cr_{ }o_{ }). this is the best known dichromate, and is the most familiar chromium compound. it forms large crystals of a brilliant red color, and is rather sparingly soluble in water. when treated with potassium hydroxide it is converted into the chromate k_{ }cr_{ }o_{ } + koh = k_{ }cro_{ } + h_{ }o. when added to a solution of lead or barium salt the corresponding chromates (not dichromates) are precipitated. with barium nitrate the equation is ba(no_{ })_{ } + k_{ }cr_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o = bacro_{ } + kno_{ } + hno_{ }. potassium dichromate finds use in many industries as an oxidizing agent, especially in the preparation of organic substances, such as the dye alizarin, and in the construction of several varieties of electric batteries. ~sodium chromates.~ the reason why the potassium salt rather than the sodium compound is used is that sodium chromate and dichromate are so soluble that it is hard to prepare them pure. this difficulty is being overcome now, and the sodium compounds are replacing the corresponding potassium salts. this is of advantage, since a sodium salt is cheaper than a potassium salt, so far as raw materials go. ~oxidizing action of chromates and dichromates.~ when a dilute solution of a chromate or dichromate is acidified with an acid, such as sulphuric acid, no reaction apparently takes place. however, if there is present a third substance capable of oxidation, the chromium compound gives up a portion of its oxygen to this substance. since the chromate changes into a dichromate in the presence of an acid, it will be sufficient to study the action of the dichromates alone. the reaction takes place in two steps. thus, when a solution of ferrous sulphate is added to a solution of potassium dichromate acidified with sulphuric acid, the reaction is expressed by the following equations: ( ) k_{ }cr_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } = k_{ }so_{ } + cr_{ }(so_{ })_{ } + h_{ }o + o, ( ) feso_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } + o = fe_{ }(so_{ })_{ } + h_{ }o. the dichromate decomposes in very much the same way as a permanganate does, the potassium and chromium being both changed into salts in which they play the part of metals, while part of the oxygen of the dichromate is liberated. by combining equations ( ) and ( ), the following is obtained: k_{ }cr_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }so_{ } + feso_{ } = k_{ }so_{ } + cr_{ }(so_{ })_{ } + fe_{ }(so_{ })_{ } + h_{ } . this reaction is often employed in the estimation of iron in iron ores. ~potassium chrome alum.~ it will be noticed that the oxidizing action of potassium dichromate leaves potassium sulphate and chromium sulphate as the products of the reaction. on evaporating the solution these substances crystallize out as potassium chrome alum, which substance is produced as a by-product in the industries using potassium dichromate for oxidizing purposes. ~chromic anhydride~ (cro_{ }). when concentrated sulphuric acid is added to a strong solution of potassium dichromate, and the liquid allowed to stand, deep red needle-shaped crystals appear which have the formula cro_{ }.this oxide of chromium is called chromic anhydride, since it combines readily with water to form chromic acid: cro_{ } + h_{ }o = h_{ }cro_{ }. it is therefore analogous to sulphur trioxide which forms sulphuric acid in a similar way: so_{ } + h_{ }o = h_{ }so_{ }. chromic anhydride is a very strong oxidizing agent, giving up oxygen and forming chromic oxide: cro_{ } = cr_{ }o_{ } + o. ~rare elements of the family.~ molybdenum, tungsten, and uranium are three rather rare elements belonging in the same family with chromium, and form many compounds which are similar in formulas to the corresponding compounds of chromium. they can play the part of metals and also form acids resembling chromic acid in formula. thus we have molybdic acid (h_{ }moo_{ }), the ammonium salt of which is (nh_{ })_{ }moo_{ }. this salt has the property of combining with phosphoric acid to form a very complex substance which is insoluble in nitric acid. on this account molybdic acid is often used in the estimation of the phosphoric acid present in a substance. like chromium, the metals are difficult to prepare in pure condition. alloys with iron can be prepared by reducing the mixed oxides with carbon in an electric furnace; these alloys are used to some extent in preparing special kinds of steel. exercises . how does pyrolusite effect the decolorizing of glass containing iron? . write the equations for the preparation of manganous chloride, carbonate, and hydroxide. . write the equations representing the reactions which take place when ferrous sulphate is oxidized to ferric sulphate by potassium permanganate in the presence of sulphuric acid. . in the presence of sulphuric acid, oxalic acid is oxidized by potassium permanganate according to the equation c_{ }h_{ }o_{ } + o = co_{ } + h_{ }o. write the complete equation. . g. of iron were dissolved in sulphuric acid and oxidized to ferric sulphate by potassium permanganate. what weight of the permanganate was required? . what weight of ferrochromium containing % chromium must be added to a ton of steel to produce an alloy containing % of chromium? . write the equation representing the action of ammonium sulphide upon chromium sulphate. . potassium chromate oxidizes hydrochloric acid, forming chlorine. write the complete equation. . give the action of sulphuric acid on potassium dichromate (a) in the presence of a large amount of water; (b) in the presence of a small amount of water. chapter xxxi gold and the platinum family ============================================================================== | | | | | | | | atomic | | highest | highest | melting | symbol | weight | density | oxide | chloride | point __________|________|________|_________|_________ |__________|_____________ | | | | | | ruthenium | ru | . | . | ruo_{ } | rucl_{ } | electric arc rhodium | rh | . | . | rho_{ } | rhcl_{ } | electric arc palladium | pd | . | . | pdo_{ } | pdcl_{ } | ° iridium | ir | . | . | iro_{ } | ircl_{ } | ° osmium | os | . | . | oso_{ } | oscl_{ } | electric arc platinum | pt | . | . | pto_{ } | ptcl_{ } | ° gold | au | . | . | au_{ }o_{ } | aucl_{ } | ° ============================================================================== ~the family.~ following iron, nickel, and cobalt in the eighth column of the periodic table are two groups of three elements each. the metals of the first of these groups--ruthenium, rhodium, and palladium--have atomic weights near and densities near . the metals of the other group--iridium, osmium, and platinum--have atomic weights near and densities near . these six rare elements have very similar physical properties and resemble each other chemically not only in the type of compounds which they form but also in the great variety of them. they occur closely associated in nature, usually as alloys of platinum in the form of irregular metallic grains in sand and gravel. platinum is by far the most abundant of the six. although the periodic classification assigns gold to the silver-copper group, its physical as well as many of its chemical properties much more closely resemble those of the platinum metals, and it can he conveniently considered along with them. the four elements gold, platinum, osmium, and iridium are the heaviest substances known, being about twice as heavy as lead. platinum ~occurrence.~ about % of the platinum of commerce comes from russia, small amounts being produced in california, brazil, and australia. ~preparation.~ native platinum is usually alloyed with gold and the platinum metals. to separate the platinum the alloy is dissolved in aqua regia, which converts the platinum into chloroplatinic acid (h_{ }ptcl_{ }). ammonium chloride is then added, which precipitates the platinum as insoluble ammonium chloroplatinate: h_{ }ptcl_{ } + nh_{ }cl = (nh_{ })_{ }ptcl_{ } + hcl. some iridium is also precipitated as a similar compound. on ignition the double chloride is decomposed, leaving the platinum as a spongy metallic mass, which is melted in an electric furnace and rolled or hammered into the desired shape. ~physical properties.~ platinum is a grayish-white metal of high luster, and is very malleable and ductile. it melts in the oxyhydrogen blowpipe and in the electric furnace; it is harder than gold and is a good conductor of electricity. in finely divided form it has the ability to absorb or occlude gases, especially oxygen and hydrogen. these gases, when occluded, are in a very active condition resembling the nascent state, and can combine with each other at ordinary temperatures. a jet of hydrogen or coal gas directed upon spongy platinum is at once ignited. ~platinum as a catalytic agent.~ platinum is remarkable for its property of acting as a catalytic agent in a large number of chemical reactions, and mention has been made of this use of the metal in connection with the manufacture of sulphuric acid. when desired for this purpose some porous or fibrous substance, such as asbestos, is soaked in a solution of platinic chloride and then ignited. the platinum compound is decomposed and the platinum deposited in very finely divided form. asbestos prepared in this way is called platinized asbestos. the catalytic action seems to be in part connected with the property of absorbing gases and rendering them nascent. some other metals possess this same power, notably palladium, which is remarkable for its ability to absorb hydrogen. ~chemical properties.~ platinum is a very inactive element chemically, and is not attacked by any of the common acids. aqua regia slowly dissolves it, forming platinic chloride (ptcl_{ }), which in turn unites with the hydrochloric acid present in the aqua regia, forming the compound chloroplatinic acid (h_{ }ptcl_{ }). platinum is attacked by fused alkalis. it combines at higher temperatures with carbon and phosphorus and alloys with many metals. it is readily attacked by chlorine but not by oxidizing agents. ~applications.~ platinum is very valuable as a material for the manufacture of chemical utensils which are required to stand a high temperature or the action of strong reagents. platinum crucibles, dishes, forceps, electrodes, and similar articles are indispensable in the chemical laboratory. in the industries it is used for such purposes as the manufacture of pans for evaporating sulphuric acid, wires for sealing through incandescent light bulbs, and for making a great variety of instruments. unfortunately the supply of the metal is very limited, and the cost is steadily advancing, so that it is now more valuable than gold. ~compounds.~ platinum forms two series of salts of which platinous chloride (ptcl_{ }) and platinic chloride (ptcl_{ }) are examples. platinates are also known. while a great variety of compounds of platinum have been made, the substance is chiefly employed in the metallic state. ~platinic chloride (ptcl_{ }).~ platinic chloride is an orange-colored, soluble compound made by heating chloroplatinic acid in a current of chlorine. if hydrochloric acid is added to a solution of the substance, the two combine, forming chloroplatinic acid (h_{ }ptcl_{ }): hcl + ptcl_{ } = h_{ }ptcl_{ }. the potassium and ammonium salts of this acid are nearly insoluble in water and alcohol. the acid is therefore used as a reagent to precipitate potassium in analytical work. with potassium chloride the equation is kcl + h_{ }ptcl_{ } = k_{ }ptcl_{ } + hcl. ~other metals of the family.~ the other members of the family have few applications. iridium is used in the form of a platinum alloy, since the alloy is much harder than pure platinum and is even less fusible. this alloy is sometimes used to point gold pens. osmium tetroxide (oso_{ }) is a very volatile liquid and is used under the name of osmic acid as a stain for sections in microscopy. gold ~occurrence.~ gold has been found in many localities, the most famous being south africa, australia, russia, and the united states. in this country it is found in alaska and in nearly half of the states of the union, notably in california, colorado, and nevada. it is usually found in the native condition, frequently alloyed with silver; in combination it is sometimes found as telluride (aute_{ }), and in a few other compounds. ~mining.~ native gold occurs in the form of small grains or larger nuggets in the sands of old rivers, or imbedded in quartz veins in rocks. in the first case it is obtained in crude form by placer mining. the sand containing the gold is shaken or stirred in troughs of running waters called sluices. this sweeps away the sand but allows the heavier gold to sink to the bottom of the sluice. sometimes the sand containing the gold is washed away from its natural location into the sluices by powerful streams of water delivered under pressure from pipes. this is called hydraulic mining. in vein mining the gold-bearing quartz is mined from the veins, stamped into fine powder in stamping mills, and the gold extracted by one of the processes to be described. ~extraction.~ . _amalgamation process._ in the amalgamation process the powder containing the gold is washed over a series of copper plates whose surfaces have been amalgamated with mercury. the gold sticks to the mercury or alloys with it, and after a time the gold and mercury are scraped off and the mixture is distilled. the mercury distills off and the gold is left in the retort ready for refining. . _chlorination process._ when gold occurs along with metallic sulphides it is often extracted by chlorination. the ore is first roasted, and is then moistened and treated with chlorine. this dissolves the gold but not the metallic oxides: au + cl = aucl_{ }. the gold chloride, being soluble, is extracted from the mixture with water, and the gold is precipitated from the solution, usually by adding ferrous sulphate: aucl_{ } + feso_{ } = au + fecl_{ } + fe_{ }(so_{ })_{ }. . _cyanide process._ this process depends upon the fact that gold is soluble in a solution of potassium cyanide in the presence of the oxygen of the air. the powder from the stamping mills is treated with a very dilute potassium cyanide solution which extracts the gold: au + kcn + h_{ }o + o = koh + kau(cn)_{ }. from this solution the gold can be obtained by electrolysis or by precipitation with metallic zinc: kau(cn)_{ } + zn = k_{ }zn(cn)_{ } + au. ~refining of gold.~ gold is refined by three general methods: . _electrolysis._ when gold is dissolved in a solution of potassium cyanide, and the solution electrolyzed, the gold is deposited in very pure condition on the cathode. . _cupellation._ when the gold is alloyed with easily oxidizable metals, such as copper or lead, it may be refined by cupellation. the alloy is fused with an oxidizing flame on a shallow hearth made of bone ash, which substance has the property of absorbing metallic oxides but not the gold. any silver which may be present remains alloyed with the gold. . _parting with sulphuric acid._ gold may be separated from silver, as well as from many other metals, by heating the alloy with concentrated sulphuric acid. this dissolves the silver, while the gold is not attacked. ~physical properties.~ gold is a very heavy bright yellow metal, exceedingly malleable and ductile, and a good conductor of electricity. it is quite soft and is usually alloyed with copper or silver to give it the hardness required for most practical uses. the degree of fineness is expressed in terms of carats, pure gold being twenty-four carats; the gold used for jewelry is usually eighteen carats, eighteen parts being gold and six parts copper or silver. gold coinage is % gold and % copper. ~chemical properties.~ gold is not attacked by any one of the common acids; aqua regia easily dissolves it, forming gold chloride (aucl_{ }), which in turn combines with hydrochloric acid to form chlorauric acid (haucl_{ }). fused alkalis also attack it. most oxidizing agents are without action upon it, and in general it is not an active element. ~compounds.~ the compounds of gold, though numerous and varied in character, are of comparatively little importance and need not be described in detail. the element forms two series of salts in which it acts as a metal: in the aurous series the gold is univalent, the chloride having the formula aucl; in the auric series it is trivalent, auric chloride having the formula aucl_{ }. gold also acts as an acid-forming element, forming such compounds as potassium aurate (kauo_{ }). its compounds are very easily decomposed, however, metallic gold separating from them. exercises . from the method of preparation of platinum, what metal is likely to be alloyed with it? . the "platinum chloride" of the laboratory is made by dissolving platinum in aqua regia. what is the compound? . how would you expect potassium aurate and platinate to be formed? what precautions would this suggest in the use of platinum vessels? . why must gold ores be roasted in the chlorination process? chapter xxxii some simple organic compounds ~division of chemistry into organic and inorganic.~ chemistry is usually divided into two great divisions,--organic and inorganic. the original significance of these terms was entirely different from the meaning which they have at the present time. . _original significance._ the division into organic and inorganic was originally made because it was believed that those substances which constitute the essential parts of living organisms were built up under the influence of the life force of the organism. such substances, therefore, should be regarded as different from those compounds prepared in the laboratory or formed from the inorganic or mineral constituents of the earth. in accordance with this view organic chemistry included those substances formed by living organisms. inorganic chemistry, on the other hand, included all substances formed from the mineral portions of the earth. in the german chemist wöhler prepared urea, a typical organic compound, from inorganic materials. the synthesis of other so-called organic compounds followed, and at present it is known that the same chemical laws apply to all substances whether formed in the living organism or prepared in the laboratory from inorganic constituents. the terms "organic" and "inorganic" have therefore lost their original significance. . _present significance._ the great majority of the compounds found in living organisms contain carbon, and the term "organic chemistry," as used at present, includes not only these compounds but all compounds of carbon. _organic chemistry_ has become, therefore, _the chemistry of the compounds of carbon_, all other substances being treated under the head of inorganic chemistry. this separation of the compounds of carbon into a group by themselves is made almost necessary by their great number, over one hundred thousand having been recorded. for convenience some of the simpler carbon compounds, such as the oxides and the carbonates, are usually discussed in inorganic chemistry. ~the grouping of compounds in classes.~ the study of organic chemistry is much simplified by the fact that the large number of bodies included in this field may be grouped in classes of similar compounds. it thus becomes possible to study the properties of each class as a whole, in much the same way as we study a group of elements. the most important of these classes are the _hydrocarbons_, the _alcohols_, the _aldehydes_, the _acids_, the _ethereal salts_, the _ethers_, the _ketones_, the _organic bases_, and the _carbohydrates_. a few members of each of these classes will now be discussed briefly. the hydrocarbons carbon and hydrogen combine to form a large number of compounds. these compounds are known collectively as the _hydrocarbons_. they may be divided into a number of groups or series, each being named from its first member. some of the groups are as follows: methane series ch_{ } methane c_{ }h_{ } ethane c_{ }h_{ } propane c_{ }h_{ } butane c_{ }h_{ } pentane c_{ }h_{ } hexane c_{ }h_{ } heptane c_{ }h_{ } octane ethylene series c_{ }h_{ } ethylene c_{ }h_{ } propylene c_{ }h_{ } butylene benzene series c_{ }h_{ } benzene c_{ }h_{ } toluene c_{ }h_{ } xylene acetylene series c_{ }h_{ } acetylene c_{ }h_{ } allylene only the lower members (that is, those which contain a small number of carbon atoms) of the above groups are given. the methane series is the most extensive, all of the compounds up to c_{ }h_{ } being known. it will be noticed that the successive members of each of the above series differ by the group of atoms (ch_{ }). such a series is called an _homologous series_. in general, it may be stated that the members of an homologous series show a regular gradation in most physical properties and are similar in chemical properties. thus in the methane group the first four members are gases at ordinary temperatures; those containing from five to sixteen carbon atoms are liquids, the boiling points of which increase with the number of carbon atoms present. those containing more than sixteen carbon atoms are solids. ~sources of the hydrocarbons.~ there are two chief sources of the hydrocarbons, namely, ( ) crude petroleum and ( ) coal tar. . _crude petroleum._ this is a liquid pumped from wells driven into the earth in certain localities. pennsylvania, ohio, kansas, california, and texas are the chief oil-producing regions in the united states. the crude petroleum consists largely of liquid hydrocarbons in which are dissolved both gaseous and solid hydrocarbons. before being used it must be refined. in this process the petroleum is run into large iron stills and subjected to fractional distillation. the various hydrocarbons distill over in the general order of their boiling points. the distillates which collect between certain limits of temperature are kept separate and serve for different uses; they are further purified, generally by washing with sulphuric acid, then with an alkali, and finally with water. among the products obtained from crude petroleum in this way are the naphthas, including benzine and gasoline, kerosene or coal oil, lubricating oils, vaseline, and paraffin. none of these products are definite chemical compounds, but each consists of a mixture of hydrocarbons, the boiling points of which lie within certain limits. . _coal tar._ this product is obtained in the manufacture of coal gas, as already explained. it is a complex mixture and is refined by the same general method used in refining crude petroleum. the principal hydrocarbons obtained from the coal tar are benzene, toluene, naphthalene, and anthracene. in addition to the hydrocarbons, coal tar contains many other compounds, such as carbolic acid and aniline. ~properties of the hydrocarbons.~ the lower members of the first two series of hydrocarbons mentioned are all gases; the succeeding members are liquids. in some series, as the methane series, the higher members are solids. the preparation and properties of methane and acetylene have been discussed in a previous chapter. ethylene is present in small quantities in coal gas and may be obtained in the laboratory by treating alcohol (c_{ }h_{ }o) with sulphuric acid: c_{ }h_{ }o = c_{ }h_{ } + h_{ }o. benzene, the first member of the benzene series, is a liquid boiling at °. the hydrocarbons serve as the materials from which a large number of compounds can be prepared; indeed, it has been proposed to call organic chemistry _the chemistry of the hydrocarbon derivatives_. ~substitution products of the hydrocarbons.~ as a rule, at least a part of the hydrogen in any hydrocarbon can be displaced by an equivalent amount of certain elements or groups of elements. thus the compounds ch_{ }cl, ch_{ }cl_{ }, chcl_{ }, ccl_{ } can be obtained from methane by treatment with chlorine. such compounds are called _substitution products_. ~chloroform~ (chcl_{ }). this can be made by treating methane with chlorine, as just indicated, although a much easier method consists in treating alcohol or acetone (which see) with bleaching powder. chloroform is a heavy liquid having a pleasant odor and a sweetish taste. it is largely used as a solvent and as an anæsthetic in surgery. ~iodoform~ (chi_{ }). this is a yellow crystalline solid obtained by treating alcohol with iodine and an alkali. it has a characteristic odor and is used as an antiseptic. alcohols when such a compound as ch_{ }cl is treated with silver hydroxide the reaction expressed by the following equation takes place: ch_{ }cl + agoh = ch_{ }oh + agcl. similarly c_{ }h_{ }cl will give c_{ }h_{ }oh and agcl. the compounds ch_{ }oh and c_{ }h_{ }oh so obtained belong to the class of substances known as _alcohols_. from their formulas it will be seen that they may be regarded as derived from hydrocarbons by substituting the hydroxyl group (oh) for hydrogen. thus the alcohol ch_{ }oh may be regarded as derived from methane (ch_{ }) by substituting the group oh for one atom of hydrogen. a great many alcohols are known, and, like the hydrocarbons, they may be grouped into series. the relation between the first three members of the methane series and the corresponding alcohols is shown in the following table: ch_{ } (methane) ch_{ }oh (methyl alcohol). c_{ }h_{ } (ethane) c_{ }h_{ }oh (ethyl alcohol). c_{ }h_{ } (propane) c_{ }h_{ }oh (propyl alcohol). ~methyl alcohol~ (_wood alcohol_) (ch_{ }oh). when wood is placed in an air-tight retort and heated, a number of compounds are evolved, the most important of which are the three liquids, methyl alcohol, acetic acid, and acetone. methyl alcohol is obtained entirely from this source, and on this account is commonly called _wood alcohol_. it is a colorless liquid which has a density of . and boils at °. it burns with an almost colorless flame and is sometimes used for heating purposes, in place of the more expensive ethyl alcohol. it is a good solvent for organic substances and is used especially as a solvent in the manufacture of varnishes. it is very poisonous. ~ethyl alcohol~ (_common alcohol_) (c_{ }h_{ }oh). . _preparation._ this compound may be prepared from glucose (c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }), a sugar easily obtained from starch. if some baker's yeast is added to a solution of glucose and the temperature is maintained at about °, bubbles of gas are soon evolved, showing that a change is taking place. the yeast contains a large number of minute organized bodies, which are really forms of plant life. the plant grows in the glucose solution, and in so doing secretes a substance known as _zymase_, which breaks down the glucose in accordance with the following equation: c_{ }h_{ }o_{ } = c_{ }h_{ }oh + co_{ }. ~laboratory preparation of alcohol.~ the formation of alcohol and carbon dioxide from glucose may be shown as follows: about g. of glucose are dissolved in a liter of water in flask a (fig. ). this flask is connected with the bottle b, which is partially filled with limewater. the tube c contains solid sodium hydroxide. a little baker's yeast is now added to the solution in flask a, and the apparatus is connected, as shown in the figure. if the temperature is maintained at about °, the reaction soon begins. the bubbles of gas escape through the limewater in b. a precipitate of calcium carbonate soon forms in the limewater, showing the presence of carbon dioxide. the sodium hydroxide in tube c prevents the carbon dioxide in the air from acting on the limewater. the alcohol remains in the flask a and may be separated by fractional distillation. [illustration: fig. ] . _properties._ ethyl alcohol is a colorless liquid with a pleasant odor. it has a density of . and boils at °. it resembles methyl alcohol in its general properties. it is sometimes used as a source of heat, since its flame is very hot and does not deposit carbon, as the flame from oil does. when taken into the system in small quantities it causes intoxication; in larger quantities it acts as a poison. the intoxicating properties of such liquors as beer, wine, and whisky are due to the alcohol present. beer contains from to % of alcohol, wine from to %, and whisky about %. the ordinary alcohol of the druggist contains % of alcohol and % of water. when this is boiled with lime and then distilled nearly all the water is removed, the distillate being called _absolute alcohol_. ~commercial preparation of alcohol.~ alcohol is prepared commercially from starch obtained from corn or potatoes. the starch is first converted into a sugar known as maltose, by the action of _malt_, a substance prepared by moistening barley with water, allowing it to germinate, and then drying it. there is present in the malt a substance known as diastase, which has the property of changing starch into maltose. this sugar, like glucose, breaks down into alcohol and carbon dioxide in the presence of yeast. the resulting alcohol is separated by fractional distillation. ~denatured alcohol.~ the % alcohol is prepared at present at a cost of about cents per gallon, which is about half the cost of the preparation of methyl alcohol. the government, however, imposes a tax on all ethyl alcohol which amounts to $ . per gallon on the % product. this increases its cost to such an extent that it is not economical to use it for many purposes for which it is adapted, such as a solvent in the preparation of paints and varnishes and as a material for the preparation of many important organic compounds. by an act of congress in , the tax was removed from _denatured_ alcohol, that is alcohol mixed with some substance which renders it unfit for the purposes of a beverage but will not impair its use for manufacturing purposes. some of the european countries have similar laws. the substances ordinarily used to denature alcohol are wood alcohol and pyridine, the latter compound having a very offensive odor. ~fermentation.~ the reaction which takes place in the preparation of ethyl alcohol belongs to the class of changes known under the general name of fermentation. thus we say that the yeast causes the glucose to ferment, and the process is known as alcoholic fermentation. there are many kinds of fermentations, and each is thought to be due to the presence of a definite substance known as an _enzyme_, which acts by catalysis. in many cases, as in alcoholic fermentation, the change is brought about by the action of minute forms of life. these probably secrete the enzymes which cause the fermentation to take place. thus the yeast plant is supposed to bring about alcoholic fermentation by secreting the enzyme known as zymase. ~glycerin~ (c_{ }h_{ }(oh)_{ }). this compound may be regarded as derived from propane (c_{ }h_{ }) by displacing three atoms of hydrogen by three hydroxyl groups, and must therefore be regarded as an alcohol. it is formed in the manufacture of soaps, as will be explained later. it is an oily, colorless liquid having a sweetish taste. it is used in medicine and in the manufacture of the explosives nitroglycerin and dynamite. aldehydes when alcohols are treated with certain oxidizing agents two hydrogen atoms are removed from each molecule of the alcohol. the resulting compounds are known as aldehydes. the relation of the aldehydes derived from methyl and ethyl alcohol to the alcohols themselves may be shown as follows: alcohols {ch_{ }oh corresponding aldehydes {ch_{ }o {c_{ }h_{ }oh {c_{ }h_{ }o the first of these (ch_{ }o) is a gas known as formaldehyde. its aqueous solution is largely used as an antiseptic and disinfectant under the name of _formalin_. acetaldehyde (c_{ }h_{ }o) is a liquid boiling at °. acids like the other classes of organic compounds, the organic acids may be arranged in homologous series. one of the most important of these series is the _fatty-acid series_, the name having been given to it because the derivatives of certain of its members are constituents of the fats. some of the most important members of the series are given in the following table. they are all monobasic, and this fact is expressed in the formulas by separating the replaceable hydrogen atom from the rest of the molecule: h·cho_{ } formic acid, a liquid boiling at °. h·c_{ }h_{ }o acetic acid, a liquid boiling at °. h·c_{ }h_{ }o_{ } propionic acid, a liquid boiling at °. h·c_{ }h_{ }o_{ } butyric acid, a liquid boiling at °. h·c_{ }h_{ }o_{ } palmitic acid, a solid melting at °. h·c_{ }h_{ }o_{ } stearic acid, a solid melting at °. ~formic acid~ (h·cho_{ }). the name "formic" is derived from the latin _formica_, signifying ant. this name was given to the acid because it was formerly obtained from a certain kind of ants. it is a colorless liquid and occurs in many plants such as the stinging nettles. the inflammation caused by the sting of the bee is due to formic acid. ~acetic acid~ (h·c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }). acetic acid is the acid present in vinegar, the sour taste being due to it. it can be prepared by either of the following methods. . _acetic fermentation._ this consists in the change of alcohol into acetic acid through the agency of a minute organism commonly called mother of vinegar. the change is represented by the following equation: c_{ }h_{ }oh + o = hc_{ }h_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o. the various kinds of vinegars are all made by this process. in the manufacture of cider vinegar the sugar present in the cider first undergoes alcoholic fermentation; the resulting alcohol then undergoes acetic fermentation. the amount of acetic acid present in vinegars varies from to %. . _from the distillation of wood._ the liquid obtained by heating wood in the absence of air contains a large amount of acetic acid, and this can be separated readily in a pure state. this is the most economical method for the preparation of the concentrated acid. acetic acid is a colorless liquid and has a strong pungent odor. many of its salts are well-known compounds. lead acetate (pb(c_{ }h_{ }o_{ })_{ }) is the ordinary _sugar of lead_. sodium acetate (nac_{ }h_{ }o_{ }) is a white solid largely used in making chemical analyses. copper acetate (cu(c_{ }h_{ }o_{ })_{ }) is a blue solid. when copper is acted upon by acetic acid in the presence of air a green basic acetate of copper is formed. this is commonly known as verdigris. all acetates are soluble in water. ~butyric acid~ (h·c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }). derivatives of butyric acid are present in butter and impart to it its characteristic flavor. ~palmitic and stearic acids.~ ordinary fats consist principally of derivatives of palmitic and stearic acids. when the fats are heated with sodium hydroxide the sodium salts of these acids are formed. if hydrochloric acid is added to a solution of the sodium salts, the free palmitic and stearic acids are precipitated. they are white solids, insoluble in water. stearic acid is often used in making candles. ~acids belonging to other series.~ in addition to members of the fatty-acid series, mention may be made of the following well-known acids. ~oxalic acid~ (h_{ }c_{ }o_{ }). this is a white solid which occurs in nature in many plants, such as the sorrels. its ammonium salt ((nh_{ })_{ }c_{ }o_{ }) is used as a reagent for the detection of calcium. when added to a solution of a calcium compound the white, insoluble calcium oxalate (cac_{ }o_{ }) precipitates. ~tartaric acid~ (h_{ }·c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }). this compound occurs either in a free state or in the form of its salts in many fruits. the potassium acid salt (khc_{ }h_{ }o_{ }) occurs in the juice of grapes. when the juice ferments in the manufacture of wine, this salt, being insoluble in alcohol, separates out on the sides of the cask and in this form is known as argol. this is more or less colored by the coloring matter of the grape. when purified it forms a white solid and is sold under the name of cream of tartar. the following are also well-known salts of tartaric acid: potassium sodium tartrate (rochelle salt) (knac_{ }h_{ }o_{ }), potassium antimonyl tartrate (tartar emetic) (ksboc_{ }h_{ }o_{ }). ~cream of tartar baking powders.~ the so-called cream of tartar baking powders consist of a mixture of cream of tartar, bicarbonate of soda, and some starch or flour. when water is added to this mixture the cream of tartar slowly acts upon the soda present liberating carbon dioxide in accordance with the following equation: khc_{ }h_{ }o_{ } + nahco_{ } = knac_{ }h_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o + co_{ }. the carbon dioxide evolved escapes through the dough, thus making it light and porous. ~citric acid~ (h_{ }·c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }). this acid occurs in many fruits, especially in lemons. it is a white solid, soluble in water, and is often used as a substitute for lemons in making lemonade. ~lactic acid~ (h·c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }). this is a liquid which is formed in the souring of milk. ~oleic acid~ (h·c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }). the derivatives of this acid constitute the principal part of many oils and liquid fats. the acid itself is an oily liquid. ethereal salts when acids are brought in contact with alcohols under certain conditions a reaction takes place similar to that which takes place between acids and bases. the following equations will serve as illustrations: koh + hno_{ } = kno_{ } + h_{ }o, ch_{ }oh + hno_{ } = ch_{ }no_{ } + h_{ }o. the resulting compounds of which methyl nitrate (ch_{ }no_{ }) may be taken as the type belong to the class known as _ethereal salts_, the name having been given them because some of them possess pleasant ethereal odors. it will be seen that the ethereal salts differ from ordinary salts in that they contain a hydrocarbon radical, such as ch_{ }, c_{ }h_{ }, c_{ }h_{ }, in place of a metal. ~the nitrates of glycerin~ (_nitroglycerin_). nitric acid reacts with glycerin in the same way that it reacts with a base containing three hydroxyl groups such as fe(oh)_{ }: fe(oh)_{ } + hno_{ } = fe(no_{ })_{ } + h_{ }o, c_{ }h_{ }(oh)_{ } + hno_{ } = c_{ }h_{ }(no_{ })_{ } + h_{ }o. the resulting nitrate (c_{ }h_{ }(no_{ })_{ }) is the main constituent of _nitroglycerin_, a slightly yellowish oil characterized by its explosive properties. dynamite consists of porous earth which has absorbed nitroglycerin, and its strength depends on the amount present. it is used much more largely than nitroglycerin itself, since it does not explode so readily by concussion and hence can be transported with safety. ~the fats.~ these are largely mixtures of the ethereal salts known respectively as olein, palmitin, and stearin. these salts may be regarded as derived from oleic, palmitic, and stearic acids respectively, by replacing the hydrogen of the acid with the glycerin radical c_{ }h_{ }. since this radical is trivalent and oleic, palmitic, and stearic acids contain only one replaceable hydrogen atom to the molecule, it is evident that three molecules of each acid must enter into each molecule of the ethereal salt. the formulas for the acids and the ethereal salts derived from each are as follows: hc_{ }h_{ }o_{ } (oleic acid) c_{ }h_{ }(c_{ }h_{ }o_{ })_{ }, (olein) hc_{ }h_{ }o_{ } (palmitic acid) c_{ }h_{ }(c_{ }h_{ } _{ })_{ } (palmitin) hc_{ }h_{ }o_{ } (stearic acid) c_{ }h_{ }(c_{ }h_{ }o_{ })_{ } (stearin) olein is a liquid and is the main constituent of liquid fats. palmitin and stearin are solids. ~butter fat and oleomargarine.~ butter fat consists principally of olein, palmitin, and stearin. the flavor of the fat is due to the presence of a small amount of butyrin, which is an ethereal salt of butyric acid. oleomargarine differs from butter mainly in the fact that a smaller amount of butyrin is present. it is made from the fats obtained from cattle and hogs. this fat is churned up with milk, or a small amount of butter is added, in order to furnish sufficient butyrin to impart the butter flavor. ~saponification.~ when an ethereal salt is heated with an alkali a reaction expressed by the following equation takes place: c_{ }h_{ }no_{ } + koh = c_{ }h_{ }oh + kno_{ }. this process is known as _saponification_, since it is the one which takes place in the manufacture of soaps. the ordinary soaps are made by heating fats with a solution of sodium hydroxide. the reactions involved may be illustrated by the following equation representing the reaction between palmitin and sodium hydroxide: c_{ }h_{ }(c_{ }h_{ }o_{ })_{ } + naoh = nac_{ }h_{ }o_{ } + c_{ }h_{ }(oh)_{ }. in accordance with this equation the ethereal salts in the fats are converted into glycerin and the sodium salts of the corresponding acids. the sodium salts are separated and constitute the soaps. these salts are soluble in water. when added to water containing calcium salts the insoluble calcium palmitate and stearate are precipitated. magnesium salts act in a similar way. it is because of these facts that soap is used up by hard waters. ethers when ethyl alcohol is heated to ° with sulphuric acid the reaction expressed by the following equation takes place: c_{ }h_{ }oh = (c_{ }h_{ })_{ }o + h_{ }o. the resulting compound, (c_{ }h_{ })_{ }o, is ordinary ether and is the most important member of the class of compounds called _ethers_. ordinarily ether is a light, very inflammable liquid boiling at °. it is used as a solvent for organic substances and as an anæsthetic in surgical operations. ketones the most common member of this group is acetone (c_{ }h_{ }o), a colorless liquid obtained when wood is heated in the absence of air. it is used in the preparation of other organic compounds, especially chloroform. organic bases this group includes a number of compounds, all of which contain nitrogen as well as carbon. they are characterized by combining directly with acids to form salts, and in this respect they resemble ammonia. they may, indeed, be regarded as derived from ammonia by displacing a part or all of the hydrogen present in ammonia by hydrocarbon radicals. among the simplest of these compounds may be mentioned methylamine (ch_{ }nh_{ }) and ethylamine (c_{ }h_{ }nh_{ }). these two compounds are gases and are formed in the distillation of wood and bones. pyridine (c_{ }h_{ }n) and quinoline (c_{ }h_{ }n) are liquids present in small amounts in coal tar, and also in the liquid obtained by the distillation of bones. most of the compounds now classified under the general name of _alkaloids_ (which see) also belong to this group. carbohydrates the term "carbohydrate" is applied to a class of compounds which includes the sugars, starch, and allied bodies these compounds contain carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen the last two elements generally being present in the proportion in which they combine to form water. the most important members of this class are the following: cane sugar c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }. milk sugar c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }. dextrose c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }. levulose c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }. cellulose c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }. starch c_{ }h_{ } _{ }. ~cane sugar~ (c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }). this is the well-known substance commonly called sugar. it occurs in many plants especially in the sugar cane and sugar beet. it was formerly obtained almost entirely from the sugar cane, but at present the greatest amount of it comes from the sugar beet. the juice from the cane or beet contains the sugar in solution along with many impurities. these impurities are removed, and the resulting solution is then evaporated until the sugar crystallizes out. the evaporation is conducted in closed vessels from which the air is partially exhausted. in this way the boiling point of the solution is lowered and the charring of the sugar is prevented. it is impossible to remove all the sugar from the solution. in preparing sugar from sugar cane the liquors left after separating as much of it as possible from the juice of the cane constitute ordinary molasses. maple sugar is made by the evaporation of the sap obtained from a species of the maple tree. its sweetness is due to the presence of cane sugar, other products present in the maple sap imparting the distinctive flavor. when a solution of cane sugar is heated with hydrochloric or other dilute mineral acid, two compounds, dextrose and levulose, are formed in accordance with the following equation: c_{ }h_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o = c_{ }h_{ }o_{ } + c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }. this same change is brought about by the action of an enzyme present in the yeast plant. when yeast is added to a solution of cane sugar fermentation is set up. the cane sugar, however, does not ferment directly: the enzyme in the yeast first transforms the sugar into dextrose and levulose, and these sugars then undergo alcoholic fermentation. when heated to ° cane sugar melts; if the temperature is increased to about °, a partial decomposition takes place and a brown substance known as caramel forms. this is used largely as a coloring matter. ~milk sugar~ (c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }). this sugar is present in the milk of all mammals. the average composition of cow's milk is as follows: water . % casein (nitrogenous matter) . butter fat . milk sugar . mineral matter . when _rennin_, an enzyme obtained from the stomach of calves, is added to milk, the casein separates and is used in the manufacture of cheese. the remaining liquid contains the milk sugar which separates on evaporation; it resembles cane sugar in appearance but is not so sweet or soluble. the souring of milk is due to the fact that the milk sugar present undergoes _lactic fermentation_ in accordance with the equation c_{ }h_{ }o_{ } + h_{ }o = c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }. the lactic acid formed causes the separation of the casein, thus giving the well-known appearance of sour milk. ~isomeric compounds.~ it will be observed that cane sugar and milk sugar have the same formulas. their difference in properties is due to the different arrangement of the atoms in the molecule. such compounds are said to be isomeric. dextrose and levulose are also isomeric. ~dextrose~ (_grape sugar, glucose_) (c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }). this sugar is present in many fruits and is commonly called grape sugar because of its presence in grape juice. it can be obtained by heating cane sugar with dilute acids, as explained above; also by heating starch with dilute acids, the change being as follows: c_{ }h_{ } _{ } + h_{ }o = c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }. pure dextrose is a white crystalline solid, readily soluble in water, and is not so sweet as cane sugar. in the presence of yeast it undergoes alcoholic fermentation. it is prepared from starch in large quantities, and being less expensive than cane sugar, is used as a substitute for it in the manufacture of jellies, jams, molasses, candy, and other sweets. the product commonly sold under the name of _glucose_ contains about % of dextrose. ~levulose~ _(fruit sugar)_(c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }). this sugar is a white solid which occurs along with dextrose in fruits and honey. it undergoes alcoholic fermentation in the presence of yeast. ~cellulose~ (c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }). this forms the basis of all woody fibers. cotton and linen are nearly pure cellulose. it is insoluble in water, alcohol, and dilute acids. sulphuric acid slowly converts it into dextrose. nitric acid forms nitrates similar to nitroglycerin in composition and explosive properties. these nitrates are variously known as nitrocellulose, pyroxylin, and gun cotton. when exploded they yield only colorless gases; hence they are used especially in the manufacture of smokeless gunpowder. _collodion_ is a solution of nitrocellulose in a mixture of alcohol and ether. _celluloid_ is a mixture of nitrocellulose and camphor. _paper_ consists mainly of cellulose, the finer grades being made from linen and cotton rags, and the cheaper grades from straw and wood. ~starch~ (c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }). this is by far the most abundant carbohydrate found in nature, being present especially in seeds and tubers. in the united states it is obtained chiefly from corn, nearly % of which is starch. in europe it is obtained principally from the potato. it consists of minute granules and is practically insoluble in cold water. these granules differ somewhat in appearance, according to the source of the starch, so that it is often possible to determine from what plant the starch was obtained. when heated with water the granules burst and the starch partially dissolves. dilute acids, as well as certain enzymes, convert it into dextrose or similar sugars. when seeds germinate the starch present is converted into soluble sugars, which are used as food for the growing plant. ~chemical changes in bread making.~ the average composition of wheat flour is as follows: water. . % protein (nitrogenous matter) . fats . starch . mineral matter . in making bread the flour is mixed with water and yeast, and the resulting dough set aside in a warm place for a few hours. the yeast first converts a portion of the starch into dextrose or a similar sugar, which then undergoes alcoholic fermentation. the carbon dioxide formed escapes through the dough, making it light and porous. the yeast plant thrives best at about °; hence the necessity for having the dough in a warm place. if the temperature rises above °, the vitality of the yeast is destroyed and fermentation ceases. in baking the bread, the heat expels the alcohol and also expands the bubbles of carbon dioxide caught in the dough, thus increasing its lightness. some derivatives of benzene attention has been called to the complex nature of coal tar. among the compounds present are the hydrocarbons, benzene, toluene, naphthalene, and anthracene. these compounds are not only useful in themselves but serve for the preparation of many other important compounds known under the general name of coal-tar products. ~nitrobenzene~ (_oil of myrbane_) (c_{ }h_{ }no_{ }). when benzene is treated with nitric acid a reaction takes place which is expressed by the following equation: c_{ }h_{ } + hno_{ } = c_{ }h_{ }no_{ } + h_{ }o. the product c_{ }h_{ }no_{ } is called nitrobenzene. it is a slightly yellowish poisonous liquid, with a characteristic odor. its main use is in the manufacture of aniline. ~aniline~ (c_{ }h_{ }nh_{ }). when nitrobenzene is heated with iron and hydrochloric acid the hydrogen evolved by the action of the iron upon the acid reduces the nitrobenzene in accordance with the following equation: c_{ }h_{ }no_{ } + h = c_{ }h_{ }nh_{ } + h_{ }o. the resulting compound is known as aniline, a liquid boiling at °. when first prepared it is colorless, but darkens on standing. large quantities of it are used in the manufacture of the _aniline or coal-tar dyes_, which include many important compounds. ~carbolic acid~ (c_{ }h_{ }oh). this compound, sometimes known as _phenol_, occurs in coal tar, and is also prepared from benzene. it forms colorless crystals which are very soluble in water. it is strongly corrosive and very poisonous. ~naphthalene and anthracene.~ these are hydrocarbons occurring along with benzene in coal tar. they are white solids, insoluble in water. the well-known _moth balls_ are made of naphthalene. large quantities of naphthalene are used in the preparation of _indigo_, a dye formerly obtained from the indigo plant, but now largely prepared by laboratory methods. similarly anthracene is used in the preparation of the dye _alizarin_, which was formerly obtained from the madder root. the alkaloids this term is applied to a group of compounds found in many plants and trees. they all contain nitrogen, and most of them are characterized by their power to combine with acids to form salts. this property is indicated by the name alkaloids, which signifies alkali-like. the salts are soluble in water, and on this account are more largely used than the free alkaloids, which are insoluble in water. many of the alkaloids are used in medicine, some of the more important ones being given below. ~quinine.~ this alkaloid occurs along with a number of others in the bark of certain trees which grow in districts in south america and also in java and other tropical islands. it is a white solid, and its sulphate is used in medicine in the treatment of fevers. ~morphine.~ when incisions are made in the unripe capsules of one of the varieties of the poppy plant, a milky juice exudes which soon thickens. this is removed and partially dried. the resulting substance is the ordinary _opium_ which contains a number of alkaloids, the principal one being morphine. this alkaloid is a white solid and is of great service in medicine. among the other alkaloids may be mentioned the following: _nicotine_, a very poisonous liquid, the salts of which occur in the leaves of the tobacco plant; _cocaine_, a crystalline solid present in coca leaves and used in medicine as a local anæsthetic; _atropine_, a solid present in the berry of the deadly nightshade, and used in the treatment of diseases of the eye; _strychnine_, a white, intensely poisonous solid present in the seeds of the members of the _strychnos_ family. index acetaldehyde acetic acid acetone acetylene series acids binary characteristics definition dibasic familiar monobasic nomenclature organic preparation strength ternary undissociated acker furnace, agate air a mechanical mixture carbon dioxide in changes in composition liquid nitrogen in oxygen in poisonous effects of exhaled properties quantitative analysis of regarded as an element standard for density water vapor in alabaster alchemists alchemy alcohol, common denatured ethyl methyl wood alcohols aldehydes alizarin alkali , family alkaline-earth family alkaloids allotropic forms alloys alum ammonium ammonium chrome ammonium iron baking powders potassium potassium chrome potassium iron aluminates aluminium bronze , chloride family hydroxide metallurgy occurrence oxide preparation properties silicates uses amalgam amethyst , ammonia composition preparation properties uses ammonium acid carbonate carbonate chloride compounds ammonium hydrosulphide hydroxide molybdate oxalate sulphate sulphide sulphide, yellow analysis anhydride carbonic chromic nitric nitrous phosphoric sulphuric anhydrite aniline anion anode anthracene antimony acids alloys chloride metallic properties occurrence oxides preparation properties sulphides apatite , , aqua ammonia aqua regia aqueous tension argon arsenic acids antidote marsh's test occurrence oxides preparation properties sulphides white arsenopyrites arsine asbestos , atmosphere constituents function of constituents atomic hypothesis theory and laws of matter and radium weights, accurate determination and general properties and specific heats calculation of dalton's method direct determination from molecular weights relation to equivalent standard for steps in determining atoms size atropine aurates avogadro's hypothesis and chemical calculations and molecular weights azote azurite babbitt metal bacteria decomposition of organic matter by nitrifying baking powders , alum soda barium chloride nitrate oxides sulphate barytes bases characteristics definition familiar nomenclature organic strength undissociated basic lining process bauxite beer benzene derivatives series benzine bessemer process bismuth basic salts chloride nitrate occurrence oxides preparation salts, hydrolysis of subnitrate uses bismuthyl chloride blast furnace lamp bleaching powder bleaching by chlorine by sulphurous acid boiler scale bone ash bone black borax bead bornite boron , acids fluoride hydride occurrence oxides preparation properties brass bread making bromides bromine occurrence oxygen compounds preparation properties bronze aluminium , butter fat butyric acid by-product cadmium compounds cæsium calamine calcite calcium carbide , carbonate chloride fluoride hydroxide occurrence oxide phosphate , preparation sulphate calomel calorie caramel carbohydrates carbolic acid carbon allotropic forms amorphous compounds crystalline forms cycle in nature dioxide and bases and plant life in air occurrence preparation properties solid disulphide , family hydrogen compounds monoxide occurrence oxides properties pure retort uses carbonates acid carbonic acid carborundum carnallite casein cassiterite catalysis catalyzers cathode cation caustic potash soda celestite celluloid cellulose cement ceramic industries cerium chalcedony chalcocite chalcopyrite chalk chamber acid changes, physical and chemical charcoal chemical affinity changes compounds equilibrium properties chemistry, definition chili saltpeter , chinaware chloric acid chlorides chlorine bleaching action chemical properties family historical occurrence oxides oxygen acids preparation properties chloroform chloroplatinic acid chlorous acid chromates chrome alum chromic acid anhydride chloride hydroxide sulphate sulphide chromite chromium a base-forming element an acid-forming element occurrence cinnabar citric acid clay coal gas products tar cobalt compounds cocaine coke collodion colemanite combining weights combustion broad sense in air phlogiston theory products spontaneous supporters compounds, chemical isomeric of metals, preparation structure of conservation of energy of matter contact process converter, bessemer copper acetate alloys of family hydroxide metallurgy occurrence ores oxide properties refining sulphate sulphide uses copperas coral corrosive sublimate corundum cream of tartar crocoisite cryolite , crystallization water of , crystallography crystals axes of systems cupric compounds cuprite cuprous compounds chloride oxide cyanides solutions are alkaline dalton's atomic hypothesis decay decomposition of organic matter decrepitation deliquescence density of gases desiccating agents developers dewar bulb dextrose diamond dichromates dichromic acid dimorphous substances dissociation and boiling point and freezing point equations of extent of distillation dogtooth spar dolomite double decomposition drummond light dyeing dynamite earth metals efflorescence electric furnace electro-chemical industries electrode electrolysis of sodium chloride of sodium sulphate of water , electrolytes electrolytic dissociation electroplating electrotyping elements, definition atomic weights earlier classification names natural groups number of occurrence periodic division physical state symbols of emery energy and plant life chemical conservation of transformation of enzyme epsom salts equations are quantitative knowledge requisite for not algebraic reading of equilibrium chemical in solution point of equivalent determination of elements with more than one relation to atomic weight etching ether ethereal salts ethers ethylamine ethylene series eudiometer evaporation families in periodic groups triads family resemblances fats fatty acid series feldspar , fermentation acetic alcoholic , lactic ferric chloride hydroxide salts reduction sulphate ferrochromium, ferromanganese ferrosilicon ferrous carbonate salts oxidation of sulphate sulphide fertilizers filtration , beds fire damp flames appearance blowpipe bunsen conditions for hydrogen luminosity oxidizing oxyhydrogen reactions reducing structure flash lights flint fluorides fluorine fluorspar , fluosilicic acid flux fool's gold formaldehyde formalin formic acid formulas how determined structural fractional distillation franklinite fuels furnace, arc electric resistance fusion methods galena gallium galvanized iron gas, collection of coal fuel illuminating measurement of natural purification of water gases, table gasoline german silver , germanium germs, effect of cold on in air in water glass coloring of etching of molding of nature of varieties glauber's salt glazing glucose glycerin nitrates of gold alloys chloride coin extraction of in copper mining occurrence properties refining of telluride goldschmidt method , gram-molecular weight granite graphite gun cotton metal powder gypsite gypsum halogens hard water heat of reaction helium , hematite , homologous series hydriodic acid hydrobromic acid hydrocarbons , properties series substitution products hydrochloric acid composition oxidation of preparation properties salts hydrocyanic acid hydrofluoric acid etching by salts of hydrogen dioxide explosive with oxygen occurrence preparation from acids preparation from water properties standard for atomic weights standard for molecular weights sulphide uses hydrolysis conditions affecting partial hydrosulphuric acid hydroxyl radical hypochlorous acid hypothesis avogadro's dalton's ice manufacture iceland spar indigo indium insoluble compounds iodic acid iodides iodine oxygen compounds preparation properties tincture iodoform , ions and electrolytes iridium iron alum cast compounds cyanides disulphide family metallurgy occurrence ores oxides pure varieties , wrought jasper kainite kaolin , kerosene ketones kieserite kindling temperature krypton lactic acid lampblack laughing gas law, definition of boyle of charles of combining volumes of conservation of energy of conservation of matter , of definite composition of dulong and petit of gay-lussac of multiple proportion of raoult periodic lead acetate , alloys basic carbonate carbonate chloride chromate insoluble compounds metallurgy nitrate occurrence oxides peroxide properties red soluble salts sugar of sulphate sulphide white le blanc soda process levulose lime air-slaked hypochlorite kilns slaked lime light limestone limewater limonite litharge lithium luminosity of flames lunar caustic magnesia alba usta magnesite magnesium basic carbonate carbonate cement chloride family hydroxide oxide silicates sulphate magnetite , malachite manganates manganese a base-forming element an acid-forming element in glass occurrence oxides manganic acid manganous salts marble marl marsh gas matches matte matter, classification conservation definition kinds measurement of gases mechanical mixtures meerschaum , mercuric chloride iodide oxide , sulphide mercurous chloride mercury iodides metallurgy occurrence oxides uses metaboric acid metallurgy metals , action on salts definition extraction occurrence preparation of compounds reduction from ores metaphosphoric acid metarsenic acid metasilicic acid metastannic acid methane , methylamine mexican onyx mica , microcosmic salt milk minerals minium mixed salts molasses molecular weights boiling-point method compared with oxygen determination freezing-point method oxygen standard of elements vapor-density method molecule molybdenum molybdic acid monazite sand mordants morphine mortar moth balls muriatic acid naphthalene naphthas nascent state natural gas sciences neon neutralization a definite act definition heat of partial niagara falls , nickel coin compounds plating nicotine nitrates nitric acid, action on metals decomposition oxidizing action preparation , properties salts nitric oxide nitrites nitrobenzene nitrocellulose nitrogen compounds in air occurrence , oxides preparation properties nitroglycerin nitrosulphuric acid nitrous acid oxide non-metals oil of myrbane of vitriol oleic acid olein oleomargarine onyx opal open-hearth process opium ores organic bases chemistry , matter, decomposition orpiment orthoarsenic acid orthophosphates orthophosphoric acid orthosilicic acid osmic acid osmium tetroxide oxalic acid oxidation , definition oxidizing agent oxygen and ozone commercial preparation history importance in air estimation, in air function, occurrence preparation properties standard for atomic weights two atoms in molecule oxyhydrogen blowpipe ozone , palladium palmitic acid palmitin paraffin paris green parkes's method for silver pearls perchloric acid periodic acid periodic division groups law law, imperfections law, value table table, arrangement permanent hardness permanganates permanganic acid peroxides petroleum pewter phenol philosopher's stone phlogiston phosphates phosphine phosphonium compounds phosphoric acid phosphorite phosphorous acid phosphorus acids family hydrogen compounds occurrence oxides preparation properties red yellow photography physical changes properties properties and periodic groups state physics , pitchblende plaster of paris platinic chloride platinized asbestos platinous chloride platinum a catalytic agent , pneumatic trough polyboric acid polyhalite polysilicic acids porcelain portland cement potash potassium acid carbonate acid sulphate acid sulphite alum, aluminium alum, chrome alum, iron and plant life aurate bromide carbonate chlorate chloride chromate cyanide dichromate ferricyanide ferrocyanide hydroxide hydroxide, action of halogens hypochlorite iodide manganate nitrate occurrence permanganate preparation sulphate precipitated chalk precipitation properties, chemical physical prussic acid puddling furnace pyridine pyrites pyrolusite pyrophosphoric acid quantitative equations quartz quicklime quinine quinoline radical radium reaction, classes addition completed heat of of decomposition of double decomposition of substitution reversible steps in realgar red lead phosphorus reducing agent reduction , rennin resemblances, family respiration rhodium rochelle salts rouge rubidium ruby ruthenium rutile safety lamp sal ammoniac soda salt saltpeter chili salts, acid, salts basic binary characteristics definition insoluble mixed nomenclature normal preparation by precipitation sand sandstone saponification sapphire satinspar scale schönite selenite selenium serpentine , shot , siderite silica silicates silicic acids silicides silicon acids dioxide fluoride hydride silver amalgamation process bromide chloride coin german in copper ores iodide metallurgy nitrate oxide parting of refining sulphide slag smalt smithsonite smokeless powder soaps soda ash soda lime sodium acetate bicarbonate carbonate carbonate, historical chloride chromates hydrogen carbonate hydroxide hyposulphite iodate nitrate occurrence peroxide phosphates preparation properties sulphate sulphite tetraborate thiosulphate solder , solubility of gases of solids solution and chemical action boiling point classes distribution of solids in electrolysis of freezing point of gases in liquids of solids in liquids properties saturated supersaturated solvay soda process sombrerite spectroscope sphalerite spiegel iron spinel spontaneous combustion stalactites stalagmites standard conditions stannates stannic acid chloride oxide stannous chloride starch stassfurt salts stearic acid stearin steel alloys properties tempering of tool stibine stibnite stoneware strontianite strontium hydroxide nitrate structural formulas structure of compounds strychnine substitution sugars cane fruit grape milk sulphates sulphides sulphites action of acids on sulphur allotropic forms chemical properties comparison with oxygen dioxide preparation properties extraction flowers of occurrence oxides physical properties trioxide uses varieties sulphuric acid action as an acid action on metals action on organic matter action on salts action on water fuming manufacture oxidizing action plant properties salts sulphuric anhydride sulphurous acid superphosphate of lime sylvine symbols synthesis table, alkali metals alkaline-earth metals alloys of copper aqueous tension appendix b atomic weights appendix a chlorine family composition of earth's crust composition of fuel gases constants of elements appendix b copper family elements appendix a gold and platinum metals hydrocarbons magnesium family manganese and chromium periodic arrangement phosphorus family silicon family solubility of gases in water solubility of salts solubility of salts at different temperatures tin and lead weights of gases appendix b talc , tartar emetic tartaric acid tellurium temporary hardness ternary acids salts tetraboric acid thallium theory, atomic definition value of thermite thio compounds thiosulphates thiosulphuric acid thorium tin block compounds crystals family foil metallurgy plate properties uses titanium , topaz triad families tungsten type metal , uranium valence a numerical property and combining ratios and equations and formulas and periodic groups and structure definition indirectly determined measure of variable vaseline venetian red verdigris vermilion vinegar vitriol, blue green oil of white volume and aqueous tension and pressure and temperature of combining gases water a compound and disease catalytic action of chalybeate chemical properties composition composition by volume composition by weight dissociation of distillation of electrolysis of , filtration of gas hard historical impurities in in air mineral occurrence of crystallization , physical properties purification of qualitative analysis quantitative analysis river sanitary analysis self-purification softening of standard substance synthesis uses of weights, atomic welsbach mantles , whisky wine witherite wood alcohol distillation wood's metal xenon yeast zinc alloys of blende chloride flowers of metallurgy occurrence oxide sulphate sulphide white zymase, announcements an elementary study of chemistry by william mcpherson, professor of chemistry in ohio state university, and william e. henderson, associate professor of chemistry in ohio state university. mo. cloth. pages. illustrated. list price, $ . ; mailing price, $ . this book is the outgrowth of many years of experience in the teaching of elementary chemistry. in its preparation the authors have steadfastly kept in mind the limitations of the student to whom chemistry is a new science. they have endeavored to present the subject in a clear, well-graded way, passing in a natural and logical manner from principles which are readily understood to those which are more difficult to grasp. the language is simple and as free as possible from unusual and technical phrases. those which are unavoidable are carefully defined. the outline is made very plain, and the paragraphing is designed to be of real assistance to the student in his reading. the book is in no way radical, either in the subject-matter selected or in the method of treatment. at the same time it is in thorough harmony with the most recent developments in chemistry, both in respect to theory and discovery. great care has been taken in the theoretical portions to make the treatment simple and well within the reach of the ability of an elementary student. the most recent discoveries have been touched upon where they come within the scope of an elementary text. especial attention has been given to the practical applications of chemistry, and to the description of the manufacturing processes in use at the present time. exercises in chemistry. by william mcpherson and william e. henderson. (_in press._) ginn & company publishers a first course in physics by robert a. millikan, associate professor of physics, and henry g. gale, assistant professor of physics in the university of chicago mo, cloth, pages, illustrated, $ . a laboratory course in physics _for secondary schools_ by robert a. millikan and henry g. gale mo, flexible cloth, pages, illustrated, cents this one-year course in physics has grown out of the experience of the authors in developing the work in physics at the school of education of the university of chicago, and in dealing with the physics instruction in affiliated high schools and academies. the book is a simple, objective presentation of the subject as opposed to a formal and mathematical one. it is intended for the third-year high-school pupils and is therefore adapted in style and method of treatment to the needs of students between the ages of fifteen and eighteen. it especially emphasizes the historical and practical aspects of the subject and connects the study very intimately with facts of daily observation and experience. the authors have made a careful distinction between the class of experiments which are essentially laboratory problems and those which belong more properly to the classroom and the lecture table. the former are grouped into a laboratory manual which is designed for use in connection with the text. the two books are not, however, organically connected, each being complete in itself. all the experiments included in the work have been carefully chosen with reference to their usefulness as effective classroom demonstrations. ginn and company publishers appendix a list of the elements, their symbols, and atomic weights the more important elements are marked with an asterisk o = *antimony sb . *argon a . *arsenic as . *barium ba . beryllium be . *bismuth bi . *boron b . *bromine br . *cadmium cd . cæsium cs . *calcium ca . *carbon c . cerium ce . *chlorine cl . *chromium cr . *cobalt co . columbium cb . *copper cu . erbium er . *fluorine f . gadolinium gd . gallium ga . germanium ge . *gold au . helium he . *hydrogen h . indium in . *iodine i . iridium ir . *iron fe . krypton kr . lanthanum la . *lead pb . lithium li . *magnesium mg . *manganese mn . *mercury hg . molybdenum mo . neodymium nd . neon ne . *nickel ni . *nitrogen n . osmium os . *oxygen o . palladium pd . *phosphorus p . *platinum pt . *potassium k . praseodymium pr . radium ra . rhodium rh . rubidium rb . ruthenium ru . samarium sm . scandium sc . selenium se . *silicon si . *silver ag . *sodium na . *strontium sr . *sulphur s . tantalum ta . tellurium te . terbium tb . thallium tl . thorium th . thulium tm . *tin sn . titanium ti . tungsten w . uranium u . vanadium v . xenon xe . ytterbium yb . yttrium yt . *zinc zn . zirconium zr . appendix b tension of aqueous vapor expressed in millimeters of mercury temperature pressure . . . . . . . . . . weight of liter of various gases measured under standard conditions acetylene . air . ammonia . carbon dioxide . carbon monoxide . chlorine . hydrocyanic acid . hydrochloric acid . hydrogen . hydrosulphuric acid . methane . nitric oxide . nitrogen . nitrous oxide . oxygen . sulphur dioxide . densities and melting points of some common elements density melting point aluminium . antimony . arsenic . -- barium . -- bismuth . boron . -- cadmium . cæsium . . calcium . -- carbon, diamond . -- " graphite . -- " charcoal . -- chromium . cobalt . copper . gold . iridium . iron . lead . lithium . magnesium . manganese . mercury . - . nickel . osmium . -- palladium . phosphorus . platinum . potassium . . rhodium . -- rubidium . . ruthenium . -- silicon . -- silver . sodium . . strontium . -- sulphur . . tin . titanium . -- zinc . color title-page images were generously provided by the university of pennsylvania schoenberg center for electronic text & image (http://dewey.library.upenn.edu/sceti). transcriber's notes: this e-book was prepared from a facsimile of the first edition and contains spelling, capitalization, and punctuation inconsistencies typical of the era. these have been preserved as they appear in the original. printer errors have also been preserved. those mentioned in the errata at the end of the book are noted with [errata: corrected text]. other obvious printer errors are noted with [transcriber's note: corrected text] where the meaning might be unclear without the correction. see also the printer's note preceding the errata, which contains material omitted from the text (the place where it should be inserted is marked in the text with a transcriber's note). there are a number of sidenotes in this book, most of which function as footnotes (e.g., citations to other works) and some of which function as true sidenotes. for the sake of clarity, sidenotes functioning as footnotes have been converted to numbered footnotes, with number markers at appropriate places in the text. a character with a macron is represented by an equal sign. e.g., [=a] indicates "a" with macron. a table of contents has been provided for the reader's convenience. the sceptical chymist: or chymico-physical doubts & paradoxes, touching the spagyrist's principles commonly call'd hypostatical, as they are wont to be propos'd and defended by the generality of alchymists. whereunto is præmis'd part of another discourse relating to the same subject. by the honourable _robert boyle_, esq; _london,_ printed by _j. cadwell_ for _j. crooke_, and are to be sold at the _ship_ in st. _paul's_ church-yard. _mdclxi._ contents a præface introductory physiological considerations the first part the second part the third part the fourth part the fifth part the sixth part the conclusion printer's note errata a prÆface introductory _to the following treatise._ _to give the reader an account, why the following treatise is suffer'd to pass abroad so maim'd and imperfect, i must inform him that 'tis now long since, that to gratify an ingenious gentleman, i set down some of the reasons that kept me from fully acquiescing either in the peripatetical, or in the chymical doctrine, of the material principles of mixt bodies. this discourse some years after falling into the hands of some learned men, had the good luck to be so favourably receiv'd, and advantageously spoken of by them, that having had more then ordinary invitations given me to make it publick, i thought fit to review it, that i might retrench some things that seem'd not so fit to be shewn to every reader, and substitute some of those other things that occurr'd to me of the trials and observations i had since made. what became of my papers, i elsewhere mention in a preface where i complain of it: but since i writ that, i found many sheets that belong'd to the subjects i am now about to discourse of. wherefore seeing that i had then in my hands as much of the first dialogue as was requisite to state the case, and serve for an introduction as well to the conference betwixt_ carneades _and_ eleutherius, _as to some other dialogues, which for certain reasons are not now herewith publish'd, i resolv'd to supply, as well as i could, the contents of a paper belonging to the second of the following discourses, which i could not possibly retrive, though it were the chief of them all. and having once more try'd the opinion of friends, but not of the same, about this imperfect work, i found it such, that i was content in complyance with their desires; that not only it should be publish'd, but that it should be publish'd as soon as conveniently might be. i had indeed all along the dialogues spoken of my self, as of a third person; for, they containing discourses which were among the first treatises that i ventur'd long ago to write of matters philosophical, i had reason to desire, with the painter, to_ latere pone tabulam, _and hear what men would say of them, before i own'd my self to be their author. but besides that now i find, 'tis not unknown to many who it is that writ them, i am made to believe that 'tis not inexpedient, they should be known to come from a person not altogether a stranger to chymical affairs. and i made the lesse scruple to let them come abroad uncompleated, partly, because my affairs and præ-ingagements to publish divers other treatises allow'd me small hopes of being able in a great while to compleat these dialogues. and partly, because i am not unapt to think, that they may come abroad seasonably enough, though not for the authors reputation, yet for other purposes. for i observe, that of late chymistry begins, as indeed it deserves, to be cultivated by learned men who before despis'd it; and to be pretended to by many who never cultivated it, that they may be thought not to ignore it: whence it is come to passe, that divers chymical notions about matters philosophical are taken for granted and employ'd, and so adopted by very eminent writers both naturalists and physitians. now this i fear may prove somewhat prejudicial to the advancement of solid philosophy: for though i am a great lover of chymical experiments, and though i have no mean esteem of divers chymical remedies, yet i distinguish these from their notions about the causes of things, and their manner of generation. and for ought i can hitherto discern, there are a thousand_ phænomena _in nature, besides a multitude of accidents relating to the humane body, which will scarcely be clearly & satisfactorily made out by them that confine themselves to deduce things from salt, sulphur and mercury, and the other notions peculiar to the chymists, without taking much more notice than they are wont to do, of the motions and figures, of the small parts of matter, and the other more catholick and fruitful affections of bodies. wherefore it will not perhaps be now unseasonable to let our_ carneades _warne men, not to subscribe to the grand doctrine of the chymists touching their three hypostatical principles, till they have a little examin'd it, and consider'd, how they can clear it from his objections, divers of which 'tis like they may never have thought on; since a chymist scarce would, and none but a chymist could propose them. i hope also it will not be unacceptable to several ingenious persons, who are unwilling to determine of any important controversie, without a previous consideration of what may be said on both sides, and yet have greater desires to understand chymical matters, than opportunities of learning them, to find here together, besides several experiments of my own purposely made to illustrate the doctrine of the elements, divers others scarce to be met with, otherwise then scatter'd among many chymical books. and to find these associated experiments so deliver'd as that an ordinary reader, if he be but acquainted with the usuall chymical termes, may easily enough understand them; and even a wary one may safely rely on them. these things i add, because a person any thing vers'd in the writings of chymists cannot but discern by their obscure, ambiguous, and almost Ænigmatical way of expressing what they pretend to teach, that they have no mind, to be understood at all, but by_ the sons of art _(as they call them) nor to be understood even by these without difficulty and hazardous tryalls. insomuch that some of them scarce ever speak so candidly, as when they make use of that known chymical sentence;_ ubi palam locuti fumus, ibi nihil diximus. _and as the obscurity of what some writers deliver makes it very difficult to be understood; so the unfaithfulness of too many others makes it unfit to be reli'd on. for though unwillingly, yet i must for the truths sake, and the readers, warne him not to be forward to believe chymical experiments when they are set down only by way of prescriptions, and not of relations; that is, unless he that delivers them mentions his doing it upon his own particular knowledge, or upon the relation of some credible person, avowing it upon his own experience. for i am troubled, i must complain, that even eminent writers, both physitians and philosophers, whom i can easily name, if it be requir'd, have of late suffer'd themselves to be so far impos'd upon, as to publish and build upon chymical experiments, which questionless they never try'd; for if they had, they would, as well as i, have found them not to be true. and indeed it were to be wish'd, that now that those begin to quote chymical experiments that are not themselves acquainted with chymical operations, men would leave off that indefinite way of vouching the chymists say this, or the chymists affirme that, and would rather for each experiment they alledge name the author or authors, upon whose credit they relate it; for, by this means they would secure themselves from the suspition of falshood (to which the other practice exposes them) and they would leave the reader to judge of what is fit for him to believe of what is deliver'd, whilst they employ not their own great names to countenance doubtfull relations; and they will also do justice to the inventors or publishers of true experiments, as well as upon the obtruders of false ones. whereas by that general way of quoting the chymists, the candid writer is defrauded of the particular praise, and the impostor escapes the personal disgrace that is due to him._ _the remaining part of this præface must be imploy'd in saying something for_ carneades, _and something for my self._ _and first_, carneades _hopes that he will be thought to have disputed civilly and modestly enough for one that was to play the antagonist and the sceptick. and if he any where seem to sleight his adversaries tenents and arguments, he is willing to have it look'd upon as what he was induc'd to, not so much by his opinion of them, as the examples of_ themistius _and_ philoponus, _and the custom of such kind of disputes._ _next, in case that some of his arguments shall not be thought of the most cogent sort that may be, he hopes it will be consider'd that it ought not to be expected, that they should be so. for, his part being chiefly but to propose doubts and scruples, he does enough, if he shews that his adversaries arguments are not strongly concluding, though his own be not so neither. and if there should appear any disagreement betwixt the things he delivers in divers passages, he hopes it will be consider'd, that it is not necessary that all the things a sceptick proposes, should be consonant; since it being his work to suggest doubts against the opinion he questions, it is allowable for him to propose two or more severall_ hypotheses _about the same thing: and to say that it may be accounted for this way, or that way, or the other way, though these wayes be perhaps inconsistent among themselves. because it is enough for him, if either of the proposed_ hypotheses _be but as probable as that he calls a question. and if he proposes many that are each of them probable, he does the more satisfie his doubts, by making it appear the more difficult to be sure, that that which they alwayes differ from is the true. and our_ carneades _by holding the negative, he has this advantage, that if among all the instances he brings to invalidate all the vulgar doctrine of those he disputes with, any one be irrefragable, that alone is sufficient to overthrow a doctrine which universally asserts what he opposes. for, it cannot be true, that all bodies whatsoever that are reckon'd among the perfectly mixt ones, are compounded of such a determinate number of such or such ingredients, in case any one such body can be produc'd, that is not so compounded; and he hopes too, that accurateness will be the less expected from him, because his undertaking obliges him to maintain such opinions in chymistry, and that chiefly by chymical arguments, as are contrary to the very principles of the chymists; from whose writings it is not therefore like he should receive any intentionall assistance, except from some passages of the bold and ingenious_ helmont, _with whom he yet disagrees in many things (which reduce him to explicate divers chymical_ phænomena, _according to other notions;) and of whose ratiocinations, not only some seem very extravagant, but even the rest are not wont to be as considerable as his experiments. and though it be true indeed, that some_ aristotelians _have occasionally written against the chymical doctrine he oppugnes, yet since they have done it according to their principles, and since our_ carneades _must as well oppose their_ hypothesis _as that of the spagyrist, he was fain to fight his adversaries with their own weapons, those of the peripatetick being improper, if not hurtfull for a person of his tenents; besides that those_ aristotelians, _(at least, those he met with,) that have written against the chymists, seem to have had so little experimental knowledge in chymical matters, that by their frequent mistakes and unskilfull way of oppugning, they have too often expos'd themselves to the derision of their adversaries, for writing so confidently against what they appear so little to understand._ _and lastly_, carneades _hopes, he shall doe the ingenious this piece of service, that by having thus drawn the chymists doctrine out of their dark and smoakie laboratories, and both brought it into the open light, and shewn the weakness of their proofs, that have hitherto been wont to be brought for it, either judicious men shall henceforth be allowed calmly and after due information to disbelieve it, or those abler chymists, that are zealous for the reputation of it, will be oblig'd to speak plainer then hitherto has been done, and maintain it by better experiments and arguments then those_ carneades _hath examin'd: so that he hopes, the curious will one way or other derive either satisfaction or instruction from his endeavours. and as he is ready to make good the profession he makes in the close of his discourse, he being ready to be better inform'd, so he expects either to be indeed inform'd, or to be let alone. for though if any truly knowing chymists shall think fit in a civil and rational way to shew him any truth touching the matter in dispute that he yet discernes not,_ carneades _will not refuse either to admit, or to own a conviction: yet if any impertinent person shall, either to get himself a name, or for what other end soever, wilfully or carelesly mistake the state of the controversie, or the sence of his arguments, or shall rail instead of arguing, as hath been done of late in print by divers chymists;_[ ] _or lastly, shall write against them in a canting way; i mean, shall express himself in ambiguous or obscure termes, or argue from experiments not intelligibly enough deliver'd_, carneades _professes, that he values his time so much, as not to think the answering such trifles worth the loss of it._ [footnote : g. and f. and h. and others, in their books against one another.] _and now having said thus much for_ carneades, _i hope the reader will give me leave to say something too for my self._ _and first, if some morose readers shall find fault with my having made the interlocutors upon occasion complement with one another, and that i have almost all along written these dialogues in a stile more fashionable then that of meer scholars is wont to be, i hope i shall be excus'd by them that shall consider, that to keep a due_ decorum _in the discourses, it was fit that in a book written by a gentleman, and wherein only gentlemen are introduc'd as speakers, the language should be more smooth, and the expressions more civil than is usual in the more scholastick way of writing. and indeed, i am not sorry to have this opportunity of giving an example how to manage even disputes with civility; whence perhaps some readers will be assisted to discern a difference betwixt bluntness of speech and strength of reason, and find that a man may be a champion for truth, without being an enemy to civility; and may confute an opinion without railing at them that hold it; to whom he that desires to convince and not to provoke them, must make some amends by his civility to their persons, for his severity to their mistakes; and must say as little else as he can, to displease them, when he says that they are in an error._ _but perhaps other readers will be less apt to find fault with the civility of my disputants, than the chymists will be, upon the reading of some passages of the following dialogue, to accuse_ carneades _of asperity. but if i have made my sceptick sometimes speak sleightingly of the opinions he opposes, i hope it will not be found that i have done any more, than became the part he was to act of an opponent: especially, if what i have made him say be compar'd with what the prince of the romane orators himself makes both great persons and friends say of one anothers opinions, in his excellent dialogues,_ de natura deorum: _and i shall scarce be suspected of partiality, in the case, by them that take notice that there is full as much (if not far more) liberty of sleighting their adversaries tenents to be met with in the discourses of those with whom_ carneades _disputes. nor needed i make the interlocutors speak otherwise then freely in a dialogue, wherein it was sufficiently intimated, that i meant not to declare my own opinion of the arguments propos'd, much lesse of the whole controversy it self otherwise than as it may by an attentive reader be guess'd at by some passages of_ carneades: _(i say, some passages, because i make not all that he says, especially in the heat of disputation, mine,) partly in this discourse, and partly in some other dialogues betwixt the same speakers (though they treat not immediately of the elements) which have long layn by me, and expect the entertainment that these present discourses will meet with. and indeed they will much mistake me, that shall conclude from what i now publish, that i am at defyance with chymistry, or would make my readers so. i hope the_ specimina _i have lately publish'd of an attempt to shew the usefulness of chymical experiments to contemplative philosophers, will give those that shall read them other thoughts of me: & i had a design (but wanted opportunity) to publish with these papers an essay i have lying by me, the greater part of which is apologetical for one sort of chymists. and at least, as for those that know me, i hope the pain i have taken in the fire will both convince them, that i am far from being an enemy to the chymists art, (though i am no friend to many that disgrace it by professing it,) and perswade them to believe me when i declare that i distinguish betwixt those chymists that are either cheats, or but laborants, and the true_ adepti; _by whom, could i enjoy their conversation, i would both willingly and thankfully be instructed; especially concerning the nature and generation of metals: and possibly, those that know how little i have remitted of my former addictedness to make chymical experiments, will easily believe, that one of the chief designes of this sceptical discourse was, not so much to discredit chymistry, as to give an occasion and a kind of necessity to the more knowing artists to lay aside a little of their over-great reservedness, & either explicate or prove the chymical theory better than ordinary chymists have done, or by enriching us with some of their nobler secrets to evince that their art is able to make amends even for the deficiencies of their theory: and thus much i shall here make bold to add, that we shall much undervalue chymistry, if we imagine, that it cannot teach us things farr more useful, not only to physick but to philosophy, than those that are hitherto known to vulgar chymists. and yet as for inferiour spagyrists themselves, they have by their labours deserv'd so well of the common-wealth of learning, that methinks 'tis pity they should ever misse the truth which they have so industriously sought. and though i be no admirer of the theorical part of their art, yet my conjectures will much deceive me, if the practical part be not much more cultivated than hitherto it has been, and do not both employ philosophy and philosophers, and help to make men such. nor would i that have been diverted by other studies as well as affairs, be thought to pretend being a profound spagyrist, by finding so many faults in the doctrine wherein the generality of chymists scruples not to acquiesce: for besides that 'tis most commonly far easier to frame objections against any propos'd_ hypothesis, _than to propose an_ hypothesis _not lyable to objections (besides this i say) 'tis no such great matter, if whereas beginners in chymistry are commonly at once imbu'd with the theory and operations of their profession, i who had the good fortune to learn the operations from illiterate persons, upon whose credit i was not tempted to take up any opinion about them, should consider things with lesse prejudice, and consequently with other eyes than the generality of learners; and should be more dispos'd to accommodate the_ phænomena _that occur'd to me to other notions than to those of the spagyrists. and having at first entertain'd a suspition that the vulgar principles were lesse general and comprehensive, or lesse considerately deduc'd from chymical operations, than was believ'd; it was not uneasie for me both to take notice of divers_ phænomena, _overlook'd by prepossest persons, that seem'd not to suite so well with the_ hermetical _doctrine; and, to devise some experiments likely to furnish me with objections against it, not known to many, that having practis'd chymistry longer perchance then i have yet liv'd, may have far more experience, than i, of particular processes._ _to conclude, whether the notions i have propos'd, and the experiments i have communicated, be considerable, or not, i willingly leave others to judge; and this only i shall say for my self, that i have endeavour'd to deliver matters of fact, so faithfully, that i may as well assist the lesse skilful readers to examine the chymical_ hypothesis, _as provoke the spagyrical philosophers to illustrate it: which if they do, and that either the chymical opinion, or the peripatetick, or any other theory of the elements differing from that i am most inclin'd to, shall be intelligibly explicated, and duly prov'd to me; what i have hitherto discours'd will not hinder it from making a proselyte of a person that loves fluctuation of judgment little enough to be willing to be eas'd of it by any thing but error._ physiological considerations touching _the experiments wont to be employed to evince either the iv peripatetick elements, or the iii chymical principles of mixt bodies._ part of the first dialogue. i perceive that divers of my friends have thought it very strange to hear me speak so irresolvedly, as i have been wont to do, concerning those things which some take to be the elements, and others to be the principles of all mixt bodies. but i blush not to acknowledge that i much lesse scruple to confess that i doubt, when i do so, then to profess that i know what i do not: and i should have much stronger expectations then i dare yet entertain, to see philosophy solidly establish't, if men would more carefully distinguish those things that they know, from those that they ignore or do but think, and then explicate clearly the things they conceive they understand, acknowledge ingenuously what it is they ignore, and profess so candidly their doubts, that the industry of intelligent persons might be set on work to make further enquiries, and the easiness of less discerning men might not be impos'd on. but because a more particular accompt will probably be expected of my unsatisfyedness not only with the peripatetick, but with the chymical doctrine of the primitive ingredients of bodies: it may possibly serve to satisfy others of the excusableness of my disatisfaction to peruse the ensuing relation of what passed a while since at a meeting of persons of several opinions, in a place that need not here be named; where the subject whereof we have been speaking, was amply and variously discours'd of. it was on one of the fairest dayes of this summer that the inquisitive _eleutherius_ came to invite me to make a visit with him to his friend _carneades_. i readily consented to this motion, telling him that if he would but permit me to go first and make an excuse at a place not far off, where i had at that hour appointed to meet, but not about a business either of moment, or that could not well admit of a delay, i would presently wait on him, because of my knowing _carneades_ to be so conversant with nature and with furnaces, and so unconfin'd to vulgar opinions, that he would probably by some ingenious paradox or other, give our mindes at least a pleasing exercise, and perhaps enrich them with some solid instruction. _eleutherius_ then first going with me to the place where my apology was to be made, i accompanied him to the lodging of _carneades_, where when we were come, we were told by the servants, that he was retired with a couple of friends (whose names they also told us) to one of the arbours in his garden, to enjoy under its coole shades a delightful protection from the yet troublesome heat of the sun. _eleutherius_ being perfectly acquainted with that garden immediately led me to the arbour, and relying on the intimate familiarity that had been long cherish'd betwixt him and _carneades_; in spight of my reluctancy to what might look like an intrusion upon his privacy, drawing me by the hand, he abruptly entered the arbour, where we found _carneades_, _philoponus_, and _themistius_, sitting close about a little round table, on which besides paper, pen, and inke, there lay two or three open books; _carneades_ appeared not at all troubled at this surprise, but rising from the table, received his friend with open looks and armes, and welcoming me also with his wonted freedom and civility, invited us to rest our selves by him, which, as soon as we had exchanged with his two friends (who were ours also) the civilities accustomed on such occasions, we did. and he presently after we had seated our selves, shutting the books that lay open, and turning to us with a smiling countenance seemed ready to begin some such unconcerning discourse as is wont to pass or rather waste the time in promiscuous companies. but _eleutherius_ guessing at what he meant to do, prevented him by telling him, i perceive _carneades_ by the books that you have been now shutting, and much more by the posture wherein i found persons qualifi'd [errata: so qualify'd] to discourse of serious matters; and so accustom'd to do it, that you three were before our coming, engag'd in some philosophical conference, which i hope you will either prosecute, and allow us to be partakers of, in recompence of the freedome we have us'd in presuming to surprise you, or else give us leave to repair the injury we should otherwise do you, by leaving you to the freedom we have interrupted, and punishing our selves for our boldness by depriving our selves of the happiness of your company. with these last words he and i rose up, as if we meant to be gone, but _carneades_ suddenly laying hold on his arme, and stopping him by it, smileingly told him, we are not so forward to lose good company as you seem to imagine; especially since you are pleas'd to desire to be present at what we shall say, about such a subject as that you found us considering. for that, being the number of the elements, principles, or materiall ingredients of bodies, is an enquiry whose truth is of that importance, and of that difficulty, that it may as well deserve as require to be searched into by such skilfull indagators of nature as your selves. and therefore we sent to invite the bold and acute _leucippus_ to lend us some light by his atomical paradox, upon which we expected such pregnant hints, that 'twas not without a great deal of trouble that we had lately word brought us that he was not to be found; and we had likewise begg'd the assistance of your presence and thoughts, had not the messenger we employ'd to _leucippus_ inform'd us, that as he was going, he saw you both pass by towards another part of the town; and this frustrated expectation of _leucippus_ his company, who told me but last night that he would be ready to give me a meeting where i pleas'd to day, having very long suspended our conference about the freshly mention'd subject, it was so newly begun when you came in, that we shall scarce need to repeat any thing to acquaint you with what has pass'd betwixt us before your arrival, so that i cannot but look upon it as a fortunate accident that you should come so seasonably, to be not hearers alone, but we hope interlocutors at our conference. for we shall not only allow of your presence at it, but desire your assistance in it; which i adde both for other reasons, and because though these learned gentlemen (sayes he, turning to his two friends) need not fear to discourse before any auditory, provided it be intelligent enough to understand them, yet for my part (continues he with a new smile,) i shall not dare to vent my unpremeditated thoughts before two such criticks, unless by promising to take your turnes of speaking, you will allow me mine of quarrelling, with what has been said. he and his friends added divers things to convince us that they were both desirous that we should hear them, and resolved against our doing so, unless we allowed them sometimes to hear us. _elutherius_ [transcriber's note: eleutherius] after having a while fruitlesly endeavoured to obtain leave to be silent promis'd he would not be so alwayes, provided that he were permitted according to the freedom of his genious and principles to side with one of them in the managing of one argument, and, if he saw cause, with his antagonist, in the prosecution of another, without being confin'd to stick to any one party or opinion, which was after some debate accorded him. but i conscious to my own disability's told them resolutely that _i_ was as much more willing as more fit to be a hearer then a speaker, among such knowing persons, and on so abstruse a subject. and that therefore i beseeched them without necessitating me to proclaim my weaknesses, to allow me to lessen them by being a silent auditor of their discourses: to suffer me to be at which i could present them no motive, save that their instructions would make them in me a more intelligent admirer. i added, that i desir'd not to be idle whilst they were imploy'd, but would if they pleas'd, by writing down in short hand what should be delivered, preserve discourses that i knew would merit to be lasting. at first _carneades_ and his two friends utterly rejected this motion; and all that my resoluteness to make use of my ears, not tongue, at their debates, could do, was to make them acquiesce in the proposition of _eleutherius_, who thinking himself concern'd, because he brought me thither, to afford me some faint assistance, was content that i should register their arguments, that i might be the better able after the conclusion of their conference to give them my sence upon the subject of it, (the number of elements or principles:) which he promis'd i should do at the end of the present debates, if time would permit, or else at our next meeting. and this being by him undertaken in my name, though without my consent, the company would by no means receive my protestation against it, but casting, all at once, their eyes on _carneades_, they did by that and their unanimous silence, invite him to begin; which (after a short pause, during which he turn'd himself to _eleutherius_ and me) he did in this manner. notwithstanding the subtile reasonings i have met with in the books of the peripateticks, and the pretty experiments that have been shew'd me in the laboratories of chymists, i am of so diffident, or dull a nature, as to think that if neither of them can bring more cogent arguments to evince the truth of their assertion then are wont to be brought; a man may rationally enough retain some doubts concerning the very number of those materiall ingredients of mixt bodies, which some would have us call elements, and others principles. indeed when i considered that the tenents concerning the elements are as considerable amongst the doctrines of natural philosophy as the elements themselves are among the bodies of the universe, i expected to find those opinions solidly establish'd, upon which so many others are superstructed. but when i took the pains impartially to examine the bodies themselves that are said to result from the blended elements, and to torture them into a confession of their constituent principles, i was quickly induc'd to think that the number of the elements has been contended about by philosophers with more earnestness then success. this unsatisfiedness of mine has been much wonder'd at, by these two gentlemen (at which words he pointed at _themistius_ and _philoponus_) who though they differ almost as much betwixt themselves about the question we are to consider, as i do from either of them, yet they both agree very well in this, that there is a determinate number of such ingredients as i was just now speaking of, and that what that number is, i say not, may be, (for what may not such as they perswade?) but is wont to be clearly enough demonstrated both by reason and experience. this has occasion'd our present conference. for our discourse this afternoon, having fallen from one subject to another, and at length setl'd on this, they proffer'd to demonstrate to me, each of them the truth of his opinion, out of both the topicks that i have freshly nam'd. but on the former (that of reason strictly so taken) we declin'd insisting at the present, lest we should not have time enough before supper to go thorough the reasons and experiments too. the latter of which we unanimously thought the most requisite to be seriously examin'd. i must desire you then to take notice gentlemen (continued _carneades_) that my present business doth not oblige me so to declare my own opinion on the subject in question, as to assert or deny the truth either of the peripatetick, or the chymical doctrine concerning the number of the elements, but only to shew you that neither of these doctrines hath been satisfactorily proved by the arguments commonly alledged on its behalfe. so that if i really discern (as perhaps i think i do) that there may be a more rational account then ordinary, given of one of these opinions, i am left free to declare my self of it, notwithstanding my present engagement, it being obvious to all your observation, that a solid truth may be generally maintained by no other, then incompetent arguments. and to this declaration i hope it will be needless to add, that my task obliges me not to answer the arguments that may be drawn either for _themistius_ or _philoponus's_ opinion from the topick of reason, as opposed to experiments; since 'tis these only that i am to examine and not all these neither, but such of them alone as either of them shall think fit to insist on, and as have hitherto been wont to be brought either to prove that 'tis the four peripatetick elements, or that 'tis the three chymical principles that all compounded bodies consist of. these things (adds _carneades_) i thought my self obliged to premise, partly lest you should do these gentlemen (pointing at _themistius_ and _philoponus_, and smiling on them) the injury of measuring their parts by the arguments they are ready to propose, the lawes of our conference confining them to make use of those that the vulgar of philosophers (for even of them there is a vulgar) has drawn up to their hands; and partly, that you should not condemn me of presumption for disputing against persons over whom i can hope for no advantage, that _i_ must not derive from the nature, or rules of our controversy, wherein i have but a negative to defend, and wherein too i am like on several occasions to have the assistance of one of my disagreeing adversaries against the other. _philoponus_ and _themistius_ soon returned this complement with civilities of the like nature, in which _eleutherius_ perceiving them engaged, to prevent the further loss of that time of which they were not like to have very much to spare, he minded them that their present businesse was not to exchange complements, but arguments: and then addressing his speech to _carneades_, i esteem it no small happinesse (saies he) that i am come here so luckily this evening. for i have been long disquieted with doubts concerning this very subject which you are now ready to debate. and since a question of this importance is to be now discussed by persons that maintain such variety of opinions concerning it, and are both so able to enquire after truth, and so ready to embrace it by whomsoever and on what occasion soever it is presented them; i cannot but promise my self that i shall before we part either lose my doubts or the hopes of ever finding them resolved; _eleutherius_ paused not here; but to prevent their answer, added almost in the same breath; and i am not a little pleased to find that you are resolved on this occasion to insist rather on experiments then syllogismes. for i, and no doubt you, have long observed, that those dialectical subtleties, that the schoolmen too often employ about physiological mysteries, are wont much more to declare the wit of him that uses them, then increase the knowledge or remove the doubts of sober lovers of truth. and such captious subtleties do indeed often puzzle and sometimes silence men, but rarely satisfy them. being like the tricks of jugglers, whereby men doubt not but they are cheated, though oftentimes they cannot declare by what slights they are imposed on. and therefore i think you have done very wisely to make it your businesse to consider the _phænomena_ relating to the present question, which have been afforded by experiments, especially since it might seem injurious to our senses, by whose mediation we acquire so much of the knowledge we have of things corporal, to have recourse to far-fetched and abstracted ratiocination [errata: ratiocinations], to know what are the sensible ingredients of those sensible things that we daily see and handle, and are supposed to have the liberty to untwist (if i may so speak) into the primitive bodies they consist of. he annexed that he wished therefore they would no longer delay his expected satisfaction, if they had not, as he feared they had, forgotten something preparatory to their debate; and that was to lay down what should be all along understood by the word principle or element. _carneades_ thank'd him for his admonition, but told him that they had not been unmindful of so requisite a thing. but that being gentlemen and very far from the litigious humour of loving to wrangle about words or terms or notions as empty; they had before his coming in, readily agreed promiscuously to use when they pleased, elements and principles as terms equivalent: and to understand both by the one and the other, those primitive and simple bodies of which the mixt ones are said to be composed, and into which they are ultimately resolved. and upon the same account (he added) we agreed to discourse of the opinions to be debated, as we have found them maintained by the generality of the assertors of the four elements of the one party, and of those that receive the three principles on the other, without tying our selves to enquire scrupulously what notion either _aristotle_ or _paracelsus_, or this or that interpreter, or follower of either of those great persons, framed of elements or principles; our design being to examine, not what these or those writers thought or taught, but what we find to be the obvious and most general opinion of those, who are willing to be accounted favourers of the peripatetick or chymical doctrine, concerning this subject. i see not (saies _eleutherius_) why you might not immediately begin to argue, if you were but agreed which of your two friendly adversaries shall be first heard. and it being quickly resolv'd on that _themistius_ should first propose the proofs for his opinion, because it was the antienter, and the more general, he made not the company expect long before he thus addressed himself to _eleutherius_, as to the person least interessed in the dispute. if you have taken sufficient notice of the late confession which was made by _carneades_, and which (though his civility dressed it up in complementall expressions) was exacted of him by his justice, i suppose you will be easily made sensible, that i engage in this controversie with great and peculiar disadvantages, besides those which his parts and my personal disabilities would bring to any other cause to be maintained by me against him. for he justly apprehending the force of truth, though speaking by no better a tongue then mine, has made it the chief condition of our duell, that i should lay aside the best weapons i have, and those i can best handle; whereas if i were allowed the freedom, in pleading for the four elements, to employ the arguments suggested to me by reason to demonstrate them, i should almost as little doubt of making you a proselyte to those unsever'd teachers, truth and _aristotle_, as i do of your candour and your judgment. and i hope you will however consider, that that great favorite and interpreter of nature, _aristotle_, who was (as his _organum_ witnesses) the greatest master of logick that ever liv'd, disclaim'd the course taken by other petty philosophers (antient and modern) who not attending the coherence and consequences of their opinions, are more sollicitous to make each particular opinion plausible independently upon the the [transcriber's note: extra "the" in original] rest, then to frame them all so, as not only to be consistent together, but to support each other. for that great man in his vast and comprehensive intellect, so fram'd each of his notions, that being curiously adapted into one systeme, they need not each of them any other defence then that which their mutuall coherence gives them: as 'tis in an arch, where each single stone, which if sever'd from the rest would be perhaps defenceless, is sufficiently secur'd by the solidity and entireness of the whole fabrick of which it is a part. how justly this may be apply'd to the present case, i could easily shew you, if i were permitted to declare to you, how harmonious _aristotles_ doctrine of the elements is with his other principles of philosophy; and how rationally he has deduc'd their number from that of the combinations of the four first qualities from the kinds of simple motion belonging to simple bodies, and from i know not how many other principles and _phænomena_ of nature, which so conspire with his doctrine of the elements, that they mutually strengthen and support each other. but since 'tis forbidden me to insist on reflections of this kind, i must proceed to tell you, that though the assertors of the four elements value reason so highly, and are furnish'd with arguments enough drawn from thence, to be satisfi'd that there must be four elements, though no man had ever yet made any sensible tryal to discover their number, yet they are not destitute of experience to satisfie others that are wont to be more sway'd by their senses then their reason. and i shall proceed to consider the testimony of experience, when i shall have first advertis'd you, that if men were as perfectly rational as 'tis to be wish'd they were, this sensible way of probation would be as needless as 'tis wont to be imperfect. for it is much more high and philosophical to discover things _a priore_, then _a posteriore_. and therefore the peripateticks have not been very sollicitous to gather experiments to prove their doctrines, contenting themselves with a few only, to satisfie those that are not capable of a nobler conviction. and indeed they employ experiments rather to illustrate then to demonstrate their doctrines, as astronomers use sphæres of pastboard, to descend to the capacities of such as must be taught by their senses, for want of being arriv'd to a clear apprehension of purely mathematical notions and truths. i speak thus _eleutherius_ (adds _themistius_) only to do right to reason, and not out of diffidence of the experimental proof i am to alledge. for though i shall name but one, yet it is such a one as will make all other appear as needless as it self will be found satisfactory. for if you but consider a piece of green-wood burning in a chimney, you will readily discern in the disbanded parts of it the four elements, of which we teach it and other mixt bodies to be compos'd. the fire discovers it self in the flame by its own light; the smoke by ascending to the top of the chimney, and there readily vanishing into air, like a river losing it self in the sea, sufficiently manifests to what element it belongs and gladly returnes. the water in its own form boyling and hissing at the ends of the burning wood betrayes it self to more then one of our senses; and the ashes by their weight, their firiness, and their dryness, put it past doubt that they belong to the element of earth. if i spoke (continues _themistius_) to less knowing persons, i would perhaps make some excuse for building upon such an obvious and easie _analysis_, but 'twould be, i fear, injurious, not to think such an apology needless to you, who are too judicious either to think it necessary that experiments to prove obvious truths should be farr fetch'd, or to wonder that among so many mixt bodies that are compounded of the four elements, some of them should upon a slight _analysis_ manifestly exhibite the ingredients they consist of. especially since it is very agreeable to the goodness of nature, to disclose, even in some of the most obvious experiments that men make, a truth so important, and so requisite to be taken notice of by them. besides that our _analysis_ by how much the more obvious we make it, by so much the more suittable it will be to the nature of that doctrine which 'tis alledged to prove, which being as clear and intelligible to the understanding as obvious to the sense, tis no marvail the learned part of mankind should so long and so generally imbrace it. for this doctrine is very different from the whimseys of _chymists_ and other modern innovators, of whose _hypotheses_ we may observe, as naturalists do of less perfect animals, that as they are hastily form'd, so they are commonly short liv'd. for so these, as they are often fram'd in one week, are perhaps thought fit to be laughed at the next; and being built perchance but upon two or three experiments are destroyed by a third or fourth, whereas the doctrine of the four elements was fram'd by _aristotle_ after he had leasurely considered those theories of former philosophers, which are now with great applause revived, as discovered by these latter ages; and had so judiciously detected and supplyed the errors and defects of former _hypotheses_ concerning the elements, that his doctrine of them has been ever since deservedly embraced by the letter'd part of mankind: all the philosophers that preceded him having in their several ages contributed to the compleatness of this doctrine, as those of succeeding times have acquiesc'd in it. nor has an _hypothesis_ so deliberately and maturely established been called in question till in the last century _paracelsus_ and some few other sooty empiricks, rather then (as they are fain to call themselves) philosophers, having their eyes darken'd, and their brains troubl'd with the smoke of their own furnaces, began to rail at the peripatetick doctrine, which they were too illiterate to understand, and to tell the credulous world, that they could see but three ingredients in mixt bodies; which to gain themselves the repute of inventors, they endeavoured to disguise by calling them, instead of earth, and fire, and vapour, salt, sulphur, and mercury; to which they gave the canting title of hypostatical principles: but when they came to describe them, they shewed how little they understood what they meant by them, by disagreeing as much from one another, as from the truth they agreed in opposing: for they deliver their _hypotheses_ as darkly as their processes; and 'tis almost as impossible for any sober man to find their meaning, as 'tis for them to find their elixir. and indeed nothing has spread their philosophy, but their great brags and undertakings; notwithstanding all which, (sayes _themistius_ smiling) i scarce know any thing they have performed worth wondering at, save that they have been able to draw _philoponus_ to their party, and to engage him to the defence of an unintelligible _hypothesis_, who knowes so well as he does, that principles ought to be like diamonds, as well very clear, as perfectly solid. _themistius_ having after these last words declared by his silence, that he had finished his discourse, _carneades_ addressing himself, as his adversary had done, to _eleutherius_, returned this answer to it, i hop'd for [errata: for a] demonstration, but i perceive _themistius_ hopes to put me off with a harangue, wherein he cannot have given me a greater opinion of his parts, then he has given me distrust for his _hypothesis_, since for it even a man of such learning can bring no better arguments. the rhetorical part of his discourse, though it make not the least part of it, i shall say nothing to, designing to examine only the argumentative part, and leaving it to _philoponus_ to answer those passages wherein either _paracelsus_ or _chymists_ are concern'd: i shall observe to you, that in what he has said besides, he makes it his business to do these two things. the one to propose and make out an experiment to demonstrate the common opinion about the four elements; and the other, to insinuate divers things which he thinks may repair the weakness of his argument, from experience, and upon other accounts bring some credit to the otherwise defenceless doctrine he maintains. to begin then with his experiment of the burning wood, it seems to me to be obnoxious to not a few considerable exceptions. and first, if i would now deal rigidly with my adversary, i might here make a great question of the very way of probation which he and others employ, without the least scruple, to evince, that the bodies commonly call'd mixt, are made up of earth, air, water, and fire, which they are pleas'd also to call elements; namely that upon the suppos'd _analysis_ made by the fire, of the former sort of _concretes_, there are wont to emerge bodies resembling those which they take for the elements. for not to anticipate here what i foresee i shall have occasion to insist on, when i come to discourse with _philoponus_ concerning the right that fire has to pass for the proper and universal instrument of analysing mixt bodies, not to anticipate that, i say, if i were dispos'd to wrangle, i might alledge, that by _themistius_ his experiment it would appear rather that those he calls elements, are made of those he calls mixt bodies, then mix'd bodies of the elements. for in _themistius's_ analyz'd wood, and in other bodies dissipated and alter'd by the fire, it appears, and he confesses, that which he takes for elementary fire and water, are made out of the concrete; but it appears not that the concrete was made up of fire and water. nor has either he, or any man, for ought i know, of his perswasion, yet prov'd that nothing can be obtained from a body by the fire that was not _pre-existent_ in it. at this unexpected objection, not only _themistius_, but the rest of the company appear'd not a little surpriz'd; but after a while _philoponus_ conceiving his opinion, as well as that of _aristotle_, concern'd in that objection, you cannot sure (sayes he to _carneades_) propose this difficulty; not to call it cavill, otherwise then as an exercise of wit, and not as laying any weight upon it. for how can that be separated from a thing that was not existent in it. when, for instance, a refiner mingles gold and lead, and exposing this mixture upon a cuppell to the violence of the fire, thereby separates it into pure and refulgent gold and lead (which driven off together with the dross of the gold is thence call'd _lithargyrium auri_) can any man doubt that sees these two so differing substances separated from the mass, that they were existent in it before it was committed to the fire. i should (replies _carneades_) allow your argument to prove something, if, as men see the refiners commonly take before hand both lead and gold to make the mass you speak of, so we did see nature pull down a parcell of the element of fire, that is fancy'd to be plac'd i know not how many thousand leagues off, contiguous to the orb of the moon, and to blend it with a quantity of each of the three other elements, to compose every mixt body, upon whose resolution the fire presents us with fire, and earth, and the rest. and let me add, _philoponus_, that to make your reasoning cogent, it must be first prov'd, that the fire do's only take the elementary ingredients asunder, without otherwise altering them. for else 'tis obvious, that bodies may afford substances which were not pre-existent in them; as flesh too long kept produces magots, and old cheese mites, which i suppose you will not affirm to be ingredients of those bodies. now that fire do's not alwayes barely separate the elementary parts, but sometimes at least alter also the ingredients of bodies, if i did not expect ere long a better occasion to prove it, i might make probable out of your very instance, wherein there is nothing elementary separated by the great violence of the refiners fire: the gold and lead which are the two ingredients separated upon the _analysis_ being confessedly yet perfectly mixt bodies, and the litharge being lead indeed; but such lead as is differing in consistence and other qualities from what it was before. to which i must add that i have sometimes seen, and so questionlesse have you much oftener, some parcells of glasse adhering to the test or cuppel, and this glass though emergent as well as the gold or litharge upon your analysis, you will not i hope allow to have been a third ingredient of the mass out of which the fire produc'd it. both _philoponus_ and _themistius_ were about to reply, when _eleutherius_ apprehending that the prosecution of this dispute would take up time, which might be better employ'd, thought fit to prevent them by saying to _carneades_: you made at least half a promise, when you first propos'd this objection, that you would not (now at least) insist on it, nor indeed does it seem to be of absolute necessity to your cause, that you should. for though you should grant that there are elements, it would not follow that there must be precisely four. and therefore i hope you will proceed to acquaint us with your other and more considerable objections against _themistius's_ opinion, especially since there is so great a disproportion in bulke betwixt the earth, water and air, on the one part, and those little parcells of resembling substances, that the fire separates from _concretes_ on the other part, that i can scarce think that you are serious, when to lose no advantage against your adversary, you seem to deny it to be rational, to conclude these great simple bodies to be the elements, and not the products of compounded ones. what you alledge (replies _carneades_) of the vastness of the earth and water, has long since made me willing to allow them to be the greatest and chief masses of matter to be met with here below: but i think i could shew you, if you would give me leave, that this will prove only that the elements, as you call them, are the chief bodies that make up the neighbouring part of the world, but not that they are such ingredients as every mixt body must consist of. but since you challenge me of something of a promise, though it be not an entire one, yet i shall willingly perform it. and indeed i intended not when i first mention'd this objection, to insist on it at present against _themistius_, (as i plainly intimated in my way of proposing it:) being only desirous to let you see, that though i discern'd my advantages, yet i was willing to forego some of them, rather then appear a rigid adversary of a cause so weak, that it may with safety be favourably dealt with. but i must here profess, and desire you to take notice of it, that though i pass on to another argument, it is not because i think this first invalid. for you will find in the progress of our dispute, that i had some reason to question the very way of probation imploy'd both by peripateticks and chymists, to evince the being and number of the elements. for that there are such, and that they are wont to be separated by the analysis made by fire, is indeed taken for granted by both parties, but has not (for ought i know) been so much as plausibly attempted to be proved by either. hoping then that when we come to that part of our debate, wherein considerations relating to this matter are to be treated of, you will remember what i have now said, and that i do rather for a while suppose, then absolutely grant the truth of what i have question'd, i will proceed to another objection. and hereupon _eleutherius_ having promis'd him not to be unmindfull, when time should serve, of what he had declar'd. i consider then (sayes _carneades_) in the next place, that there are divers bodies out of which _themistius_ will not prove in haste, that there can be so many elements as four extracted by the fire. and i should perchance trouble him if i should ask him what peripatetick can shew us, (i say not, all the four elements, for that would be too rigid a question, but) any one of them extracted out of gold by any degree of fire whatsoever. nor is gold the only bodie in nature that would puzzle an _aristotelian_, that is no more [errata: (that is no more)] to analyze by the fire into elementary bodies, since, for ought i have yet observ'd, both silver and calcin'd _venetian_ talck, and some other concretes, not necessary here to be nam'd, are so fixt, that to reduce any of them into four heterogeneous substances has hitherto prov'd a task much too hard, not only for the disciples of _aristotle_, but those of _vulcan_, at least, whilst the latter have employ'd only fire to make the _analysis_. the next argument (continues _carneades_) that i shall urge against _themistius's_ opinion shall be this, that as there are divers bodies whose _analysis_ by fire cannot reduce them into so many heterogeneous substances or ingregredients [transcriber's note: ingredients] as four, so there are others which may be reduc'd into more, as the blood (and divers other parts) of men and other animals, which yield when analyz'd five distinct substances, phlegme, spirit, oyle, salt and earth, as experience has shewn us in distilling mans blood, harts-horns, and divers other bodies that belonging to the animal-kingdom abound with not uneasily sequestrable salt. the sceptical chymist: or chymico-physical doubts & paradoxes, touching the experiments whereby vulgar spagyrists are wont to endeavour to evince their salt, sulphur and mercury, to be the true principles of things. _utinam jam tenerentur omnia, & inoperta ac confessa veritas esset! nihil ex decretis mutaremus. nunc veritatem cum eis qui docent, quærimus._ sen. _london,_ printed for _j. crooke_, and are to be sold at the ship in st. _pauls_ church-yard. . the sceptical chymist. _the first part._ i am (sayes _carneades_) so unwilling to deny _eleutherius_ any thing, that though, before the rest of the company i am resolv'd to make good the part i have undertaken of a sceptick; yet i shall readily, since you will have it so, lay aside for a while the person of an adversary to the peripateticks and chymists; and before i acquaint you with my objections against their opinions, acknowledge to you what may be (whether truly or not) tollerably enough added, in favour of a certain number of principles of mixt bodies, to that grand and known argument from the _analysis_ of compound bodies, which i may possibly hereafter be able to confute. and that you may the more easily examine, and the better judge of what i have to say, i shall cast it into a pretty number of distinct propositions, to which i shall not premise any thing; because i take it for granted, that you need not be advertis'd, that much of what i am to deliver, whether for or against a determinate number of ingredients of mix'd bodies, may be indifferently apply'd to the four peripatetick elements, and the three chymical principles, though divers of my objections will more peculiarly belong to these last nam'd, because the chymical _hypothesis_ seeming to be much more countenanc'd by experience then the other, it will be expedient to insist chiefly upon the disproving of that; especially since most of the arguments that are imploy'd against it, may, by a little variation, be made to conclude, at least as strongly against the less plausible, _aristotelian_ doctrine. to proceed then to my propositions, i shall begin with this. that [sidenote: propos. i.] _it seems not absurd to conceive that at the first production of mixt bodies, the universal matter whereof they among other parts of the universe consisted, was actually divided into little particles of several sizes and shapes variously mov'd._ this (sayes _carneades_) i suppose you will easily enough allow. for besides that which happens in the generation, corruption, nutrition, and wasting of bodies, that which we discover partly by our _microscopes_ of the extream littlenesse of even the scarce sensible parts of concretes; and partly by the chymical resolutions of mixt bodies, and by divers other operations of spagyrical fires upon them, seems sufficiently to manifest their consisting of parts very minute and of differing figures. and that there does also intervene a various local motion of such small bodies, will scarce be denied; whether we chuse to grant the origine of concretions assign'd by _epicurus_, or that related by _moses_. for the first, as you well know, supposes not only all mixt bodies, but all others to be produc'd by the various and casual occursions of atomes, moving themselves to and fro by an internal principle in the immense or rather infinite _vacuum_. and as for the inspir'd historian, he, informing us that the great and wise author of things did not immediately create plants, beasts, birds, &c. but produc'd them out of those portions of the pre-existent, though created, matter, that he calls water and earth, allows us to conceive, that the constituent particles whereof these new concretes were to consist, were variously moved in order to their being connected into the bodies they were, by their various coalitions and textures, to compose. but (continues _carneades_) presuming that the first proposition needs not be longer insisted on, i will pass on to the second, and tell you that [sidenote: propos. ii.] _neither is it impossible that of these minute particles divers of the smallest and neighbouring ones were here and there associated into minute masses or clusters, and did by their coalitions constitute great store of such little primary concretions or masses as were not easily dissipable into such particles as compos'd them._ to what may be deduc'd, in favour of this assertion, from the nature of the thing it self, i will add something out of experience, which though i have not known it used to such a purpose, seems to me more fairly to make out that there may be elementary bodies, then the more questionable experiments of peripateticks and chymists prove that there are such. i consider then that gold will mix and be colliquated not only with silver, copper, tin and lead, but with antimony, _regulus martis_ and many other minerals, with which it will compose bodies very differing both from gold, and the other ingredients of the resulting concretes. and the same gold will also by common _aqua regis_, and (i speak it knowingly) by divers other _menstruums_ be reduc'd into a seeming liquor, in so much that the corpuscles of gold will, with those of the _menstruum_, pass through cap-paper, and with them also coagulate into a crystalline salt. and i have further try'd, that with a small quantity of a certain saline substance i prepar'd, i can easily enough sublime gold into the form of red crystalls of a considerable length; and many other wayes may gold be disguis'd, and help to constitute bodies of very differing natures both from it and from one another, and neverthelesse be afterward reduc'd to the self-same numerical, yellow, fixt, ponderous and malleable gold it was before its commixture. nor is it only the fixedst of metals, but the most fugitive, that i may employ in favour of our proposition: for quicksilver will with divers metals compose an _amalgam_, with divers _menstruums_ it seems to be turn'd into a liquor, with _aqua fortis_ will be brought into either a red or white powder or precipitate, with oyl of vitriol into a pale yellow one, with sulphur it will compose a blood-red and volatile cinaber, with some saline bodies it will ascend in form of a salt which will be dissoluble in water; with _regulus_ of antimony and silver i have seen it sublim'd into a kinde of crystals, with another mixture i reduc'd it into a malleable body, into a hard and brittle substance by another: and some there are who affirm, that by proper additaments they can reduce quicksilver into oyl, nay into glass, to mention no more. and yet out of all these exotick compounds, we may recover the very same running mercury that was the main ingredient of them, and was so disguis'd in them. now the reason (proceeds _carneades_) that i have represented these things concerning gold and quicksilver, is, that it may not appear absurd to conceive, that such little primary masses or clusters, as our proposition mentions, may remain undissipated, notwithstanding their entring into the composition of various concretions, since the corpuscle of gold and mercury, though they be not primary concretions of the most minute particles or matter, but confessedly mixt bodies, are able to concurre plentifully to the composition of several very differing bodies, without losing their own nature or texture, or having their cohæsion violated by the divorce of their associated parts or ingredients. give me leave to add (sayes _eleutherius_) on this occasion, to what you now observ'd, that as confidently as some chymists, and other modern innovators in philosophy are wont to object against the peripateticks, that from the mixture of their four elements there could arise but an inconsiderable variety of compound bodies; yet if the _aristotelians_ were but half as well vers'd in the works of nature as they are in the writings of their master, the propos'd objection would not so calmly triumph, as for want of experiments they are fain to suffer it to do. for if we assigne to the corpuscles, whereof each element consists, a peculiar size and shape, it may easily enough be manifested, that such differingly figur'd corpuscles may be mingled in such various proportions, and may be connected so many several wayes, that an almost incredible number of variously qualified concretes may be compos'd of them. especially since the corpuscles of one element may barely, by being associated among themselves, make up little masses of differing size and figure from their constituent parts: and since also to the strict union of such minute bodies there seems oftentimes nothing requisite, besides the bare contact of a great part of their surfaces. and how great a variety of _phænomena_ the same matter, without the addition of any other, and only several ways dispos'd or contexed, is able to exhibit, may partly appear by the multitude of differing engins which by the contrivances of skilful mechanitians, and the dexterity of expert workmen, may be made of iron alone. but in our present case being allow'd to deduce compound bodies from four very differently qualified sorts of matter, he who shall but consider what you freshly took notice of concerning the new concretes resulting from the mixture of incorporated minerals, will scarce doubt but that the four elements mannag'd by natures skill may afford a multitude of differing compounds. i am thus far of your minde (sayes _carneades_) that the _aristotelians_ might with probability deduce a much greater number of compound bodies from the mixture of their four elements, than according to their present _hypothesis_ they can, if instead of vainly attempting to deduce the variety and properties of all mixt bodies from the combinations and temperaments of the four elements, as they are (among them) endowd with the four first qualities, they had endeavoured to do it by the bulk and figure of the smallest parts of those supposed elements. for from these more catholick and fruitfull accidents of the elementary matter may spring a great variety of textures, upon whose account a multitude of compound bodies may very much differ from one another. and what i now observe touching the four peripatetick elements, may be also applyed, _mutatis mutandis_, (as they speak) to the chymical principles. but (to take notice of that by the by) both the one and the other, must, i fear, call in to their assistance something that is not elementary, to excite or regulate the motion of the parts of the matter, and dispose them after the manner requisite to the constitution of particular concretes. for that otherwise they are like to give us but a very imperfect account of the origine of very many mixt bodies, it would, i think, be no hard matter to perswade you, if it would not spend time, and were no digression, to examine, what they are wont to alledge of the origine of the textures and qualities of mixt bodies, from a certain substantial form, whose origination they leave more obscure than what it is assum'd to explicate. but to proceed to a new proposition. [sidenote: propos. iii.] _i shall not peremptorily deny, that from most of such mixt bodies as partake either of animal or vegetable nature, there may by the help of the fire, be actually obtain'd a determinate number (whether three, four or five, or fewer or more) of substances, worthy of differing denominations._ of the experiments that induce me to make this concession, i am like to have occasion enough to mention several in the prosecution of my discourse. and therefore, that i may not hereafter be oblig'd to trouble you and my self with needless repetitions, i shall now only desire you to take notice of such experiments, when they shall be mention'd, and in your thoughts referre them hither. to these three concessions i have but this fourth to add, that [sidenote: propos. iv.] _it may likewise be granted, that those distinct substances, which concretes generally either afford or are made up of, may without very much inconvenience be call'd the elements or principles of them._ when i said, _without very much inconvenience_, i had in my thoughts that sober admonition of _galen_, _cum de re constat, de verbis non est litigandum_. and therefore also i scruple not to say _elements_ or _principles_, partly because the chymists are wont to call the ingredients of mixt bodies, _principles_, as the _aristotelians_ name them _elements_; i would here exclude neither. and, partly, because it seems doubtfull whether the same ingredients may not be call'd _principles_? as not being compounded of any more primary bodies: and _elements_, in regard that all mix'd bodies are compounded of them. but i thought it requisite to limit my concession by premising the words, _very much_, to the word _inconvenience_, because that though the inconvenience of calling the distinct substances, mention'd in the proposition _elements_ or _principles_, be not very great, yet that it is an impropriety of speech, and consequently in a matter of this moment not to be altogether overlook'd, you will perhaps think, as well as i, by that time you shall have heard the following part of my discourse, by which you will best discern what construction to put upon the former propositions, and how far they may be look'd upon, as things that i concede as true, and how far as things i only represent as specious enough to be fit to be consider'd. and now _eleutherius_ (continues _carneades_) i must resume the person of a sceptick, and as such, propose some part of what may be either dislik't, or at least doubted of in the common _hypothesis_ of the chymists: which if i examine with a little the more freedom, i hope i need not desire you (a person to whom i have the happinesse of being so well known) to look upon it as something more suitable to the employment whereto the company has, for this meeting, doom'd me; then either to my humour or my custom. now though i might present you many things against the vulgar chymical opinion of the three principles, and the experiments wont to be alledg'd as demonstrations of it, yet those i shall at present offer you may be conveniently enough comprehended in four capital considerations; touching all which i shall only premise this in general, that since it is not my present task so much to assert an _hypothesis_ of my own, as to give an account wherefore i suspect the truth of that of the chymists, it ought not to be expected that all my objections should be of the most cogent sort, since it is reason enough to doubt of a propos'd opinion, that there appears no cogent reason for it. to come then to the objections themselves; i consider in the first place, that notwithstanding what common chymists have prov'd or taught, it may reasonably enough be doubted, how far, and in what sence, fire ought to be esteem'd the genuine and universal instrument of analyzing mixt bodies. this doubt, you may remember, was formerly mention'd, but so transiently discours'd of, that it will now be fit to insist upon it; and manifest that it was not so inconsiderately propos'd as our adversaries then imagin'd. but, before i enter any farther into this disquisition, i cannot but here take notice, that it were to be wish'd, our chymists had clearly inform'd us what kinde of division of bodies by fire must determine the number of the elements: for it is nothing near so easy as many seem to think, to determine distinctly the effects of heat, as i could easily manifest, if i had leasure to shew you how much the operations of fire may be diversify'd by circumstances. but not wholly to pass by a matter of this importance, i will first take notice to you, that _guajacum_ (for instance) burnt with an open fire in a chimney, is sequestred into ashes and soot, whereas the same wood distill'd in a retort does yield far other heterogeneities, (to use the _helmontian_ expression) and is resolv'd into oyl, spirit, vinager, water and charcoal; the last of which to be reduc'd into ashes, requires the being farther calcin'd then it can be in a close vessel: besides having kindled amber, and held a clean silver spoon, or some other concave and smooth vessel over the smoak of its flame, i observ'd the soot into which that fume condens'd, to be very differing from any thing that i had observ'd to proceed from the steam of amber purposely (for that is not usual) distilled _per se_ in close vessels. thus having, for tryals sake, kindled camphire, and catcht the smoak that copiously ascended out of the flame, it condens'd into a black and unctuous soot, which would not have been guess'd by the smell or other properties to have proceeded from camphire: whereas having (as i shall otherwhere more fully declare) expos'd a quantity of that fugitive concrete to a gentle heat in a close glass-vessel, it sublim'd up without seeming to have lost any thing of its whiteness, or its nature, both which it retain'd, though afterwards i so encreased the fire as to bring it to fusion. and, besides camphire, there are divers other bodies (that i elsewhere name) in which the heat in close vessels is not wont to make any separation of heterogeneities, but only a comminution of parts, those that rise first being homogeneal with the others, though subdivided into smaller particles: whence sublimations have been stiled, _the pestles of the chymists_. but not here to mention what i elsewhere take notice of, concerning common brimstone once or twice sublim'd, that expos'd to a moderate fire in subliming-pots, it rises all into dry, and almost tastless, flowers; whereas being expos'd to a naked fire it affords store of a saline and fretting liquor: not to mention this, i say, i will further observe to you, that as it is considerable in the _analysis_ of mixt bodies, whether the fire act on them when they are expos'd to the open air, or shut up in close vessels, so is the degree of fire by which the _analysis_ is attempted of no small moment. for a milde _balneum_ will sever unfermented blood (for instance) but into phlegme and _caput mortuum_, the later whereof (which i have sometimes had) hard, brittle, and of divers colours, (transparent almost like tortoise-shell) press'd by a good fire in a retort yields a spirit, an oyl or two, and a volatile salt, besides a [errata: another] _caput mortuum_. it may be also pertinent to our present designe, to take notice of what happens in the making and distilling of sope; for by one degree of fire the salt, the water and the oyl or grease, whereof that factitious concrete is made up, being boyl'd up together are easily brought to mingle and incorporate into one mass; but by another and further degree of heat the same mass may be again divided into an oleagenous, an aqueous, a saline, and an earthy part. and so we may observe that impure silver and lead being expos'd together to a moderate fire, will thereby be colliquated into one mass, and mingle _per minima_, as they speak, whereas a much vehementer fire will drive or carry off the baser metals (i mean the lead, and the copper or other alloy) from the silver, though not, for ought appears, separate them from one another. besides, when a vegetable abounding in fixt salt is analyz'd by a naked fire, as one degree of heat will reduce it into ashes, (as the chymists themselves teach us) so, by only a further degree of fire, those ashes may be vitrified and turn'd into glass. i will not stay to examine how far a meere chymist might on this occasion demand, if it be lawful for an _aristotelian_ to make ashes, (which he mistakes for meere earth) pass for an element, because by one degree of fire it may be produc'd, why a chymist may not upon the like principle argue, that glass is one of the elements of many bodies, because that also may be obtain'd from them, barely by the fire? i will not, i say, lose time to examine this, but observe, that by a method of applying the fire, such similar bodies may be obtain'd from a concrete, as chymists have not been able to separate; either by barely burning it in an open fire, or by barely distilling it in close vessels. for to me it seems very considerable, and i wonder that men have taken so little notice of it, that i have not by any of the common wayes of distillation in close vessels, seen any separation made of such a volatile salt as is afforded us by wood, when that is first by an open fire divided into ashes and soot, and that soot is afterwards plac'd in a strong retort, and compell'd by an urgent fire to part with its spirit, oyl and salt; for though i dare not peremptorily deny, that in the liquors of _guajacum_ and other woods distill'd in retorts after the common manner, there may be saline parts, which by reason of the analogy may pretend to the name of some kinde of volatile salts; yet questionless there is a great disparity betwixt such salts and that which we have sometimes obtain'd upon the first distillation of soot (though for the most part it has not been separated from the first or second rectification, and sometimes not till the third) for we could never yet see separated from woods analyz'd only the vulgar way in close vessels any volatile salt in a dry and saline form, as that of soot, which we have often had very crystalline and geometrically figur'd. and then, whereas the saline parts of the spirits of _guajacum_, &c. appear upon distillation sluggish enough, the salt of soot seems to be one of the most volatile bodies in all nature; and if it be well made will readily ascend with the milde heat of a furnace, warm'd only by the single wieck of a lamp, to the top of the highest glass vessels that are commonly made use of for distillation: and besides all this, the taste and smell of the salt of soot are exceeding differing from those of the spirits of _guajacum_, &c. and the former not only smells and tastes much less like a vegetable salt, than like that of harts-horn, and other animal concretes; but in divers other properties seems more of kinne to the family of animals, than to that of vegetable salts, as i may elsewhere (god permitting) have an occasion more particularly to declare. i might likewise by some other examples manifest, that the chymists, to have dealt clearly, ought to have more explicitly and particularly declar'd by what degree of fire, and in what manner of application of it, they would have us judge a division made by the fire to be a true _analysis_ into their principles, and the productions of it to deserve the name of elementary bodies. but it is time that i proceed to mention the particular reasons that incline me to doubt, whether the fire be the true and universal analyzer of mixt bodies; of which reasons what has been already objected may pass for one. in the next place i observe, that there are some mixt bodies from which it has not been yet made appear, that any degree of fire can separate either salt or sulphur or mercury, much less all the three. the most obvious instance of this truth is gold, which is a body so fix'd, and wherein the elementary ingredients (if it have any) are so firmly united to each other, that we finde not in the operations wherein gold is expos'd to the fire, how violent soever, that it does discernably so much as lose of its fixednesse or weight, so far is it from being dissipated into those principles, whereof one at least is acknowledged to be fugitive enough; and so justly did the spagyricall poet somewhere exclaim, _cuncta adeo miris illic compagibus harent._ and i must not omit on this occasion to mention to you, _eleutherius_, the memorable experiment that i remember i met with in _gasto claveus_,[ ] who, though a lawyer by profession, seems to have had no small curiosity and experience in chymical affairs: he relates then, that having put into one small earthen vessel an ounce of the most pure gold, and into another the like weight of pure silver, he plac'd them both in that part of a glass-house furnace wherein the workmen keep their metal, (as our english artificers call their liquid glass) continually melted, and that having there kept both the gold and the silver in constant fusion for two moneths together, he afterwards took them out of the furnace and the vessels, and weighing both of them again, found that the silver had not lost above a th part of its weight, but the gold had not of his lost any thing at all. and though our author endeavours to give us of this a scholastick reason, which i suppose you would be as little satisfied with, as i was when i read it; yet for the matter of fact, which will serve our present turne, he assures us, that though it be strange, yet experience it self taught it him to be most true. [footnote : _gasto claveus_ apolog. argur. & chrysopera.] and though there be not perhaps any other body to be found so perfectly fix'd as gold, yet there are divers others so fix'd or compos'd, at least of so strictly united parts, that i have not yet observ'd the fire to separate from them any one of the chymists principles. i need not tell you what complaints the more candid and judicious of the chymists themselves are wont to make of those boasters that confidently pretend, that they have extracted the salt or sulphur of quicksilver, when they have disguis'd it by additaments, wherewith it resembles the concretes whose names are given it; whereas by a skilful and rigid _examen_, it may be easily enough stript of its disguises, and made to appear again in the pristine form of running mercury. the pretended salts and sulphurs being so far from being elementary parts extracted out of the bodie of mercurie, that they are rather (to borrow a terme of the grammarians) de-compound bodies, made up of the whole metal and the _menstruum_ or other additaments imploy'd to disguise it. and as for silver, i never could see any degree of fire make it part with any of its three principles. and though the experiment lately mentioned from _claveus_ may beget a suspition that silver may be dissipated by fire, provided it be extreamly violent and very lasting: yet it will not necessarily follow, that because the fire was able at length to make the silver lose a little of its weight, it was therefore able to dissipate it into its principles. for first i might alledge that i have observ'd little grains of silver to lie hid in the small cavities (perhaps glas'd over by a vitrifying heat) in crucibles, wherein silver has been long kept in fusion, whence some goldsmiths of my acquaintance make a benefit by grinding such crucibles to powder, to recover out of them the latent particles of silver. and hence i might argue, that perhaps _claveus_ was mistaken, and imagin'd that silver to have been driven away by the fire, that indeed lay in minute parts hid in his crucible, in whose pores so small a quantity as he mist of so ponderous a bodie might very well lie conceal'd. but secondly, admitting that some parts of the silver were driven away by the violence of the fire, what proof is there that it was either the salt, the sulphur, or the mercury of the metal, and not rather a part of it homogeneous to what remain'd? for besides, that the silver that was left seem'd not sensibly alter'd, which probably would have appear'd, had so much of any one of its principles been separated from it: we finde in other mineral bodies of a less permanent nature than silver, that the fire may divide them into such minute parts, as to be able to carry them away with its self, without at all destroying their nature. thus we see that in the refining of silver, the lead that is mix'd with it (to carry away the copper or other ignoble mineral that embases the silver) will, if it be let alone, in time evaporate away upon the test; but if (as is most usual amongst those that refine great quantities of metals together) the lead be blown off from the silver by bellowes, that which would else have gone away in the form of unheeded steams, will in great part be collected not far from the silver, in the form of a darkish powder or calx, which, because it is blown off from silver, they call litharge of silver. and thus _agricola_[ ] in divers places informs us, when copper, or the oare of it is colliquated by the violence of the fire with _cadmia_, the sparks that in great multitudes do fly upwards do, some of them, stick to the vaulted roofs of the furnaces, in the form of little and (for the most part) white bubbles, which therefore the greeks, and, in imitation of them, our drugsters call _pompholix_: and others more heavy partly adhere to the sides of the furnace, and partly (especially if the covers be not kept upon the pots) fall to the ground, and by reason of their ashy colour as well as weight were called by the same greeks [greek: spodos], which, i need not tell you, in their language signifies ashes. i might add, that i have not found that from venetian talck (i say venetian, because i have found other kinds of that mineral more open) from the _lapis ossifragus_, (which the shops call _ostiocolla_) from _muscovia_ glass, from pure and fusible sand, to mention now no other concretes; those of my acquaintance that have try'd have been able by the fire to separate any one of the hypostatical principles, which you will the less scruple to believe, if you consider that glass may be made by the bare colliquation of the salt and earth remaining in the ashes of a burnt plant, and that yet common glass, once made, does so far resist the violence of the fire, that most chymists think it a body more undestroyable then gold it self. for if the artificer can so firmly unite such comparative gross particles as those of earth and salt that make up common ashes, into a body indissoluble by fire; why may not nature associate in divers bodies the more minute elementary corpuscles she has at hand too firmly to let them be separable by the fire? and on this occasion, _eleutherius_, give me leave to mention to you two or three sleight experiments, which will, i hope, be found more pertinent to our present discourse, than at first perhaps they will appear. the first is, that, having (for tryals sake) put a quantity of that fugitive concrete, camphire, into a glass vessel, and plac'd it in a gentle heat, i found it (not leaving behinde, according to my estimate, not so much as one grain) to sublime to the top of the vessel into flowers: which in whiteness, smell, &c. seem'd not to differ from the camphire it self. another experiment is that of _helmont_, who in several places affirms, that a coal kept in a glass exactly clos'd will never be calcin'd to ashes, though kept never so long in a strong fire. to countenance which i shall tell you this tryal of my own, that having sometimes distilled some woods, as particularly box, whilst our _caput mortuum_ remain'd in the retort, it continued black like charcoal, though the retort were earthen, and kept red-hot in a vehement fire; but as soon as ever it was brought out of the candent vessel into the open air, the burning coals did hastily degenerate or fall asunder, without the assistance of any new calcination, into pure white ashes. and to these two i shall add but this obvious and known observation, that common sulphur (if it be pure and freed from its vinager) being leasurely sublim'd in close vessels, rises into dry flowers, which may be presently melted into a bodie of the same nature with that which afforded them. though if brimstone be burnt in the open air it gives, you know, a penetrating fume, which being caught in a glass-bell condenses into that acid liquor called oyl of sulphur _per campanam_. the use i would make of these experiments collated with what i lately told you out of _agricola_ is this, that even among the bodies that are not fixt, there are divers of such a texture, that it will be hard to make it appear, how the fire, as chymists are wont to imploy it, can resolve them into elementary substances. for some bodies being of such a texture that the fire can drive them into the cooler and less hot part of the vessels wherein they are included, and if need be, remove them from place to place to fly the greatest heat, more easily than it can divorce their elements (especially without the assistance of the air) we see that our chymists cannot analyze them in close vessels, and of other compound bodies the open fire can as little separate the elements. for what can a naked fire do to analyze a mixt bodie, if its component principles be so minute, and so strictly united, that the corpuscles of it need less heat to carry them up, than is requisite to divide them into their principles. so that of some bodies the fire cannot in close vessels make any _analysis_ at all, and others will in the open air fly away in the forms of flowers or liquors, before the heat can prove able to divide them into their principles. and this may hold, whether the various similar parts of a concrete be combin'd by nature or by art; for in factitious _sal armoniack_ we finde the common and the urinous salts so well mingled, that both in the open fire, and in subliming vessels they rise together as one salt, which seems in such vessels irresoluble by fire alone. for i can shew you _sal armoniack_ which after the ninth sublimation does still retain its compounded nature. and indeed i scarce know any one mineral, from which by fire alone chymists are wont to sever any substance simple enough to deserve the name of an element or principle. for though out of native cinnaber they distill quicksilver, and though from many of those stones that the ancients called _pyrites_ they sublime brimstone, yet both that quicksilver and this sulphur being very often the same with the common minerals that are sold in the shops under those names, are themselves too much compounded bodies to pass for the elements of such. and thus much, _eleutherius_, for the second argument that belongs to my first consideration; the others i shall the lesse insist on, because i have dwelt so long upon this. [footnote : _agricola_ de natura fossil. lib. . cap. . & .] proceed we then in the next place to consider, that there are divers separations to be made by other means, which either cannot at all, or else cannot so well be made by the fire alone. when gold and silver are melted into one mass, it would lay a great obligation upon refiners and goldsmiths to teach them the art of separating them by the fire, without the trouble and charge they are fain to be at to sever them. whereas they may be very easily parted by the affusion of spirit of nitre or _aqua fortis_ (which the french therefore call _eau de depart_:) so likewise the metalline part of vitriol will not be so easily and conveniently separated from the saline part even by a violent fire, as by the affusion of certain alkalizate salts in a liquid form upon the solution of vitriol made in common water. for thereby the acid salt of the vitriol, leaving the copper it had corroded to joyn with the added salts, the metalline part will be precipitated to the bottom almost like mud. and that i may not give instances only in de-compound bodies, i will add a not useless one of another kinde. not only chymists have not been able (for ought is vulgarly known) by fire alone to separate true sulphur from antimony; but though you may finde in their books many plausible processes of extracting it, yet he that shall make as many fruitlesse tryals as i have done to obtain it by, most of them will, i suppose, be easily perswaded, that the productions of such processes are antimonial sulphurs rather in name than nature. but though antimony sublim'd by its self is reduc'd but to a volatile powder, or antimonial flowers, of a compounded nature like the mineral that affords them: yet i remember that some years ago i sublim'd out of antimony a sulphur, and that in greater plenty then ever i saw obtain'd from that mineral, by a method which i shall therefore acquaint you with, because chymists seem not to have taken notice of what importance such experiments may be in the indagation of the nature, and especially of the number of the elements. having then purposely for tryals sake digested eight ounces of good and well powder'd antimony with twelve ounces of oyl of vitriol in a well stopt glas-vessel for about six or seven weeks; and having caus'd the mass (grown hard and brittle) to be distill'd in a retort plac'd in sand, with a strong fire; we found the antimony to be so opened, or alter'd by the _menstruum_ wherewith it had been digested, that whereas crude antimony, forc'd up by the fire, arises only in flowers, our antimony thus handled afforded us partly in the receiver, and partly in the neck and at the top of the retort, about an ounce of sulphur, yellow and brittle like common brimstone, and of so sulphureous a smell, that upon the unluting the vessels it infected the room with a scarce supportable stink. and this sulphur, besides the colour and smell, had the perfect inflamability of common brimstone, and would immediately kindle (at the flame of a candle) and burn blew like it. and though it seem'd that the long digestion wherein our antimony and _menstruum_ were detain'd, did conduce to the better unlocking of the mineral, yet if you have not the leasure to make so long a digestion, you may by incorporating with powder'd antimony a convenient quantity of oyl of vitriol, and committing them immediately to distillation, obtain a little sulphur like unto the common one, and more combustible than perhaps you will at first take notice of. for i have observ'd, that though (after its being first kindled) the flame would sometimes go out too soon of its self, if the same lump of sulphur were held again to the flame of a candle, it would be rekindled and burn a pretty while, not only after the second, but after the third or fourth accension. you, to whom i think i shewed my way of discovering something of sulphureous in oyl of vitriol, may perchance suspect, _eleutherius_, either that this substance was some venereal sulphur that lay hid in that liquor, and was by this operation only reduc'd into a manifest body; or else that it was a compound of the unctuous parts of the antimony, and the saline ones of the vitriol, in regard that (as _gunther_[ ] informs us) divers learned men would have sulphur to be nothing but a mixture made in the bowels of the earth of vitriolate spirits and a certain combustible substance. but the quantity of sulphur we obtain'd by digestion was much too great to have been latent in the oyl of vitriol. and that vitriolate spirits are not necessary to the constitution of such a sulphur as ours, i could easily manifest, if i would acquaint you with the several wayes by which i have obtain'd, though not in such plenty, a sulphur of antimony, colour'd and combustible like common brimstone. and though i am not now minded to discover them, yet i shall tell you, that to satisfie some ingenious men, that distill'd vitriolate spirits are not necessary to the obtaining of such a sulphur as we have been considering, i did by the bare distillation of only spirit of nitre, from its weight of crude antimony separate, in a short time, a yellow and very inflamable sulphur, which, for ought i know, deserves as much the name of an element, as any thing that chymists are wont to separate from any mineral by the fire. i could perhaps tell you of other operations upon antimony, whereby that may be extracted from it, which cannot be forc'd out of it by the fire; but i shall reserve them for a fitter opportunity, and only annex at present this sleight, but not impertinent experiment. that whereas i lately observed to you, that the urinous and common salts whereof _sal armoniack_ consists, remain'd unsever'd by the fire in many successive sublimations, they may be easily separated, and partly without any fire at all, by pouring upon the concrete finely powder'd, a solution of salt of tartar, or of the salt of wood-ashes; for upon your diligently mixing of these you will finde your nose invaded with a very strong smell of urine, and perhaps too your eyes forc'd to water by the same subtle and piercing body that produces the stink; both these effects proceeding from hence, that by the alcalizate salt, the sea salt that enter'd the composition of the _sal armoniack_ is mortify'd and made more fixt, and thereby a divorce is made between it and the volatile urinous salt, which being at once set at liberty, and put into motion, begins presently to fly away, and to offend the nostrils and eyes it meets with by the way. and if the operation of these salts be in convenient glasses promoted by warmth, though but by that of a bath, the ascending steams may easily be caught and reduc'd into a penetrant spirit, abounding with a salt, which i have sometimes found to be separable in a crystalline form. i might add to these instances, that whereas sublimate, consisting, as you know, of salts & quicksilver combin'd and carried up together by heat, may be sublim'd, i know not how often, by a like degree of fire, without suffering any divorce of the component bodies, the mercury may be easily sever'd from the adhering salts, if the sublimate be distill'd from salt of tartar, quick lime, or such alcalizate bodies. but i will rather observe to you, _eleutherius_, what divers ingenious men have thought somewhat strange; that by such an additament that seems but only to promote the separation, there may be easily obtain'd from a concrete that by the fire alone is easily divisible into all the elements that vegetables are suppos'd to consist of, such a similar substance as differs in many respects from them all, and consequently has by many of the most intelligent chymists been denied to be contain'd in the mixt body. for i know a way, and have practis'd it, whereby common tartar, without the addition of any thing that is not perfectly a mineral except salt-petre, may by one distillation in an earthen retort be made to afford good store of real salt, readily dissoluble in water, which i found to be neither acid, nor of the smell of tartar, and to be almost as volatile as spirit of wine it self, and to be indeed of so differing a nature from all that is wont to be separated by fire from tartar, that divers learned men, with whom i discours'd of it, could hardly be brought to beleeve, that so fugitive a salt could be afforded by tartar, till i assur'd it them upon my own knowledge. and if i did not think you apt to suspect me to be rather too backward than too forward to credit or affirm unlikely things, i could convince you by what i have yet lying by me of that anomalous salt. [footnote : lib. . observat. cap. .] the fourth thing that i shall alledge to countenance my first consideration is, that the fire even when it divides a body into substances of divers consistences, does not most commonly analyze it into hypostatical principles, but only disposes its parts into new textures, and thereby produces concretes of a new indeed, but yet of a compound nature. this argument it will be requisite for me to prosecute so fully hereafter, that i hope you will then confess that 'tis not for want of good proofs that i desire leave to suspend my proofs till the _series_ of my discourse shall make it more proper and seasonable to propose them. it may be further alledg'd on the behalf of my first consideration, that some such distinct substances may be obtain'd from some concretes without fire, as deserve no less the name of elementary, than many that chymists extort by the violence of the fire. we see that the inflamable spirit, or as the chymists esteem it, the sulphur of wine, may not only be separated from it by the gentle heat of a bath, but may be distill'd either by the help of the sun-beams, or even of a dunghill, being indeed of so fugitive a nature, that it is not easy to keep it from flying away, even without the application of external heat. i have likewise observ'd that a vessel full of urine being plac'd in a dunghill, the putrefaction is wont after some weeks so to open the body, that the parts disbanding the saline spirit, will within no very long time, if the vessel be not stopt, fly away of it self; insomuch that from such urine i have been able to distill little or nothing else than a nauseous phlegme, instead of the active and piercing salt and spirit that it would have afforded, when first expos'd to the fire, if the vessel had been carefully stopt. and this leads me to consider in the fifth place, that it will be very hard to prove, that there can no other body or way be given which will as well as the fire divide concretes into several homogeneous substances, which may consequently be call'd their elements or principles, as well as those separated or produc'd by the fire. for since we have lately seen, that nature can successefully employ other instruments than the fire to separate distinct substances from mixt bodies, how know we, but that nature has made, or art may make, some such substance as may be a fit instrument to analyze mixt bodies, or that some such method may be found by humane industry or luck, by whose means compound bodies may be resolv'd into other substances, than such as they are wont to be divided into by the fire. and why the products of such an _analysis_ may not as justly be call'd the component principles of the bodies that afford them, it will not be easy to shew, especially since i shall hereafter make it evident, that the substances which chymists are wont to call the salts, and sulphurs, and mercuries of bodies, are not so pure and elementary as they presume, and as their _hypothesis_ requires. and this may therefore be the more freely press'd upon the chymists, because neither the _paracelsians_, nor the _helmontians_ can reject it without apparent injury to their respective masters. for _helmont_ do's more than once inform his readers, that both _paracelsus_ and himself were possessors of the famous liquor, _alkahest_, which for its great power in resolving bodies irresoluble by vulgar fires, he somewhere seems to call _ignis gehennæ_. to this liquor he ascribes, (and that in great part upon his own experience) such wonders, that if we suppose them all true, i am so much the more a friend to knowledge than to wealth, that i should think the _alkahest_ a nobler and more desireable secret than the philosophers stone it self. of this universal dissolvent he relates, that having digested with it for a competent time a piece of oaken charcoal, it was thereby reduc'd into a couple of new and distinct liquors, discriminated from each other by their colour and situation, and that the whole body of the coal was reduc'd into those liquors, both of them separable from his immortal _menstruum_, which remain'd as fit for such operations as before. and he moreover tells us in divers places of his writings, that by this powerful, and unwearied agent, he could dissolve metals, marchasites, stones, vegetable and animal bodies of what kinde soever, and even glass it self (first reduc'd to powder,) and in a word, all kinds of mixt bodies in the world into their several similar substances, without any residence or _caput mortuum_. and lastly, we may gather this further from his informations, that the homogeneous substances obtainable from compound bodies by his piercing liquor, were oftentimes different enough both as to number and as to nature, from those into which the same bodies are wont to be divided by common fire. of which i shall need in this place to mention no other proof, then that whereas we know that in our common _analysis_ of a mixt body, there remains a terrestrial and very fixt substance, oftentimes associated with a salt as fixt; our author tells us, that by his way he could distill over all concretes without any _caput mortuum_, and consequently could make those parts of the concrete volatile, which in the vulgar _analysis_ would have been fixt. so that if our chymists will not reject the solemn and repeated testimony of a person, who cannot but be acknowledg'd for one of the greatest spagyrists that they can boast of, they must not deny that there is to be found in nature another agent able to analyze compound bodies less violently, and both more genuinely and more universally than the fire. and for my own part, though i cannot but say on this occasion what (you know) our friend mr. _boyle_ is wont to say, when he is askt his opinion of any strange experiment; _that he that hath seen it hath more reason to beleeve it, than he that hath not_; yet i have found _helmont_ so faithful a writer, even in divers of his improbable experiments (i alwayes except that extravagant treatise _de magnetica vulnerum curatione_, which some of his friends affirm to have been first publish'd by his enemies) that i think it somewhat harsh to give him the lye, especially to what he delivers upon his own proper tryal. and i have heard from very credible eye-witnesses some things, and seen some others my self, which argue so strongly, that a circulated salt, or a _menstruum_ (such as it may be) may by being abstracted from compound bodies, whether mineral, animal, or vegetable, leave them more unlockt than a wary naturalist would easily beleeve, that i dare not confidently measure the power of nature and art by that of the _menstruums_, and other instruments that eminent chymists themselves are as yet wont to empoly [errata: employ] about the analyzing of bodies; nor deny that a _menstruum_ may at least from this or that particular concrete obtain some apparently similar substance, differing from any obtainable from the same body by any degree or manner of application of the fire. and i am the more backward to deny peremptorily, that there may be such openers of compound bodies, because among the experiments that make me speak thus warily, there wanted not some in which it appear'd not, that one of the substances not separable by common fires and _menstruums_ could retain any thing of the salt by which the separation was made. and here, _eleutherius_, (sayes _carneades_) i should conclude as much of my discourse as belongs to the first consideration i propos'd, but that i foresee, that what i have delivered will appear liable to two such specious objections, that i cannot safely proceed any further till i have examin'd them. and first, one sort of opposers will be forward to tell me, that they do not pretend by fire alone to separate out of all compound bodies their _hypostatical_ principles; it being sufficient that the fire divides them into such, though afterwards they employ other bodies to collect the similar parts of the compound; as 'tis known, that though they make use of water to collect the saline parts of ashes from the terrestrial wherewith they are blended, yet it is the fire only that incinerates bodies, and reduces the fix'd part of them into the salt and earth, whereof ashes are made up. this objection is not, i confess, inconsiderable, and i might in great part allow of it, without granting it to make against me, if i would content my self to answer, that it is not against those that make it that i have been disputing, but against those vulgar chymists, who themselves believe, and would fain make others do so, that the fire is not only an universal, but an adæquate [transcriber's note: adequate] and sufficient instrument to analyze mixt bodies with. for as to their practice of extracting the fix'd salt out of ashes by the affusion of water, 'tis obvious to alleadge, that the water does only assemble together the salt the fire had before divided from the earth: as a sieve does not further break the corn, but only bring together into two distinct heaps the flour and the bran, whose corpuscles before lay promiscuously blended together in the meal. this i say i might alleadge, and thereby exempt my self from the need of taking any farther notice of the propos'd objection. but not to lose the rise it may afford me of illustrating the matter under consideration, i am content briefly to consider it, as far forth as my present disquisition may be concern'd in it. not to repeat then what has been already answer'd, i say farther, that though i am so civil an adversary, that i will allow the chymists, after the fire has done all its work, the use of fair water to make their extractions with, in such cases wherein the water does not cooperate with the fire to make the _analysis_; yet since i grant this but upon supposition that the water does only wash off the saline particles, which the fire alone has before extricated in the analyz'd body, it will not be reasonable, that this concession should extend to other liquors that may add to what they dissolve, nor so much as to other cases than those newly mentioned: which limitation i desire you would be pleas'd to bear in mind till i shall anon have occasion to make use of it. and this being thus premis'd, i shall proceed to observe, first, that many of the instances i propos'd in the preceding discourse are such, that the objection we are considering will not at all reach them. for fire can no more with the assistance of water than without it separate any of the three principles, either from gold, silver, mercury, or some others of the concretes named above. hence we may inferre, that fire is not an universal analyzer of all mixt bodies, since of metals and minerals, wherein chymists have most exercis'd themselves, there appear scarce any which they are able to analyze by fire, nay, from which they can unquestionably separate so much as any one of their hypostatical principles; which may well appear no small disparagement as well to their _hypothesis_ as to their pretensions. it will also remain true, notwithstanding the objection, that there may be other wayes than the wonted _analysis_ by fire, to separate from a compound body substances as homogeneneous [transcriber's note: homogeneous] as those that chymists scruple not to reckon among their _tria prima_ (as some of them, for brevity sake, call their three principles.) and it appears, that by convenient additaments such substances may be separated by the help of the fire, as could not be so by the fire alone: witness the sulphur of antimony. and lastly, i must represent, that since it appears too that the fire is but one of the instruments that must be employ'd in the resolution of bodies, we may reasonably challenge the liberty of doing two things. for when ever any _menstruum_ or other additament is employ'd, together with the fire to obtain a sulphur or a salt from a body, we may well take the freedom to examine, whether or no that _menstruum_ do barely help to separate the principle obtain'd by it, or whether there intervene not a coalition of the parts of the body wrought upon with those of the _menstruum_, whereby the produc'd concrete may be judg'd to result from the union of both. and it will be farther allowable for us to consider, how far any substance, separated by the help of such additaments, ought to pass for one of the _tria prima_; since by one way of handling the same mixt body it may according to the nature of the additaments, and the method of working upon it, be made to afford differing substances from those obtainable from it by other additaments, and another method, nay and (as may appear by what i formerly told you about tartar) differing from any of the substances into which a concrete is divisible by the fire without additaments, though perhaps those additaments do not, as ingredients, enter the composition of the obtained body, but only diversify the operation of the fire upon the concrete; and though that concrete by the fire alone may be divided into a number of differing substances, as great as any of the chymists that i have met with teach us that of the elements to be. and having said thus much (sayes _carneades_) to the objection likely to be propos'd by some chymists, i am now to examine that which i foresee will be confidently press'd by divers peripateticks, who, to prove fire to be the true analyzer of bodies, will plead, that it is the very definition of heat given by _aristotle_, and generally received, _congregare homogenea, & heterogenea segregare_, to assemble things of a resembling, and disjoyn those of a differing nature. to this i answer, that this effect is far from being so essential to heat, as 'tis generally imagin'd; for it rather seems, that the true and genuine property of heat is, to set a moving, and thereby to dissociate the parts of bodies, and subdivide them into minute particles, without regard to their being homogeneous or heterogeneous, as is apparent in the boyling of water, the distillation of quicksilver, or the exposing of bodies to the action of the fire, whose parts either are not (at least in that degree of heat appear not) dissimilar, where all that the fire can do, is to divide the body into very minute parts which are of the same nature with one another, and with their _totum_, as their reduction by condensation evinces. and even when the fire seems most so _congregare homogenea, & segregare heterogenea_, it produces that effect but by accident; for the fire does but dissolve the cement, or rather shatter the frame, or [tructure [errata: structure] that kept the heterogeneous parts of bodies together, under one common form; upon which dissolution the component particles of the mixt, being freed and set at liberty, do naturally, and oftentimes without any operation of the fire, associate themselves each with its like, or rather do take those places which their several degrees of gravity and levity, fixedness or volatility (either natural, or adventitious from the impression of the fire) assigne them. thus in the distillation (for instance) of man's blood, the fire do's first begin to dissolve the _nexus_ or cement of the body; and then the water, being the most volatile, and easy to be extracted, is either by the igneous atomes, or the agitation they are put into by the fire, first carried up, till forsaken by what carried it up, its weight sinks it down into the receiver: but all this while the other principles of the concrete remain unsever'd, and require a stronger degree of heat to make a separation of its more fixt elements; and therefore the fire must be increas'd which carries over the volatile salt and the spirit, they being, though beleev'd to be differing principles, and though really of different consistency, yet of an almost equal volatility. after them, as less fugitive, comes over the oyl, and leaves behinde the earth and the _alcali_, which being of an equal fixednesse, the fire severs them not, for all the definition of the schools. and if into a red-hot earthen or iron retort you cast the matter to be distill'd, you may observe, as i have often done, that the predominant fire will carry up all the volatile elements confusedly in one fume, which will afterwards take their places in the receiver, either according to the degree of their gravity, or according to the exigency of their respective textures; the salt adhering, for the most part, to the sides and top, and the phlegme fastening it self there too in great drops, the oyle and spirit placing themselves under, or above one another, according as their ponderousness makes them swim or sink. for 'tis observable, that though oyl or liquid sulphur be one of the elements separated by this fiery _analysis_, yet the heat which accidentally unites the particles of the other volatile principles, has not alwayes the same operation on this, there being divers bodies which yield two oyls, whereof the one sinks to the bottom of that spirit on which the other swims; as i can shew you in some oyls of the same deers blood, which are yet by me: nay i can shew you two oyls carefully made of the same parcel of humane blood, which not only differ extreamly in colour, but swim upon one another without mixture, and if by agitation confounded will of themselves divorce again. and that the fire doth oftentimes divide bodies, upon the account that some of their parts are more fixt, and some more volatile, how far soever either of these two may be from a pure elementary nature is obvious enough, if men would but heed it in the burning of wood, which the fire dissipates into smoake and ashes: for not only the latter of these is confessedly made up of two such differing bodies as earth and salt; but the former being condens'd into that soot which adheres to our chimneys, discovers it self to contain both salt and oyl, and spirit and earth, (and some portion of phlegme too) which being, all almost, equally volatile to that degree of fire which forces them up, (the more volatile parts helping perhaps, as well as the urgency of the fire, to carry up the more fixt ones, as i have often try'd in dulcify'd _colcothar_, sublim'd by _sal armoniack_ blended with it) are carried up together, but may afterwards be separated by other degrees of fire, whose orderly gradation allowes the disparity of their volatileness to discover it self. besides, if differing bodies united into one mass be both sufficiently fixt, the fire finding no parts volatile enough to be expell'd or carried up, makes no separation at all; as may appear by a mixture of colliquated silver and gold, whose component metals may be easily sever'd by _aqua fortis_, or _aqua regis_ (according to the predominancy of the silver or the gold) but in the fire alone, though vehement, the metals remain unsever'd, the fire only dividing the body into smaller particles (whose littlenesse may be argu'd from their fluidity) in which either the little nimble atoms of fire, or its brisk and numberless strokes upon the vessels, hinder rest and continuity, without any sequestration of elementary principles. moreover, the fire sometimes does not separate, so much as unite, bodies of a differing nature; provided they be of an almost resembling fixedness, and have in the figure of their parts an aptness to coalition, as we see in the making of many plaisters, oyntments, &c. and in such metalline mixtures as that made by melting together two parts of clean brass with one of pure copper, of which some ingenious trades-men cast such curious patterns (for gold and silver works) as i have sometimes taken great pleasure to look upon. sometimes the bodies mingled by the fire are differing enough as to fixidity and volatility, and yet are so combin'd by the first operation of the fire, that it self does scarce afterwards separate them, but only pulverize them; whereof an instance is afforded us by the common preparation of _mercurius dulcis_, where the saline particles of the vitriol, sea salt, and sometimes nitre, employ'd to make the sublimate, do so unite themselves with the mercurial particles made use of, first to make sublimate, and then to dulcifie it, that the saline and metalline parts arise together in many successive sublimations, as if they all made but one body. and sometimes too the fire does not only not sever the differing elements of a body, but combine them so firmly, that nature her self does very seldom, if ever, make unions less dissoluble. for the fire meeting with some bodies exceedingly and almost equally fixt, instead of making a separation, makes an union so strict, that it self, alone, is unable to dissolve it; as we see, when an alcalizate salt and the terrestrial residue of the ashes are incorporated with pure sand, and by vitrification made one permanent body, (i mean the course or greenish sort of glass) that mocks the greatest violence of the fire, which though able to marry the ingredients of it, yet is not able to divorce them. i can shew you some pieces of glass which i saw flow down from an earthen crucible purposely expos'd for a good while, with silver in it, to a very vehement fire. and some that deal much in the fusion of metals informe me, that the melting of a great part of a crucible into glass is no great wonder in their furnaces. i remember, i have observ'd too in the melting of great quantities of iron out of the oar, by the help of store of charcoal (for they affirm that sea-coal will not yield a flame strong enough) that by the prodigious vehemence of the fire, excited by vast bellows (made to play by great wheels turn'd about by water) part of the materials expos'd to it was, instead of being analyz'd, colliquated, and turn'd into a dark, solid and very ponderous glass, and that in such quantity, that in some places i have seen the very high-wayes, neer such iron-works, mended with heaps of such lumps of glasse, instead of stones and gravel. and i have also observ'd, that some kind of fire-stone it self, having been employ'd in furnaces wherein it was expos'd to very strong and lasting fires, has had all its fixt parts so wrought on by the fire, as to be perfectly vitrifi'd, which i have try'd by forcing from it pretty large pieces of perfect and transparent glass. and lest you might think, _eleutherius_, that the question'd definition of heat may be demonstrated, by the definition which is wont to be given and acquiesc'd in, of its contrary quality, cold, whose property is taught to be _tam homogenea, quam heterogenea congregare_; give me leave to represent to you, that neither is this definition unquestionable; for not to mention the exceptions, which a _logician_, as such, may take at it, i consider that the union of heterogeneous bodies which is suppos'd to be the genuine production of cold, is not perform'd by every degree of cold. for we see for instance that in the urine of healthy men, when the liquor has been suffer'd a while to stand, the cold makes a separation of the thinner part from the grosser, which subsides to the bottom, and growes opacous there; whereas if the urinal be warme, these parts readily mingle again, and the whole liquor becomes transparent as before. and when, by glaciation, wood, straw, dust, water, &c. are suppos'd to be united into one lump of ice, the cold does not cause any real union or adunation, (if i may so speak) of these bodies, but only hardening the aqueous parts of the liquor into ice, the other bodies being accidentally present in that liquor are frozen up in it, but not really united. and accordingly if we expose a heap of mony consisting of gold, silver and copper coynes, or any other bodies of differing natures, which are destitute of aqueous moisture, capable of congelation, to never so intense a cold, we find not that these differing bodies are at all thereby so much as compacted, much less united together; and even in liquors themselves we find _phænomena_ which induce us to question the definition which we are examining. if _paracelsus_ his authority were to be look't upon as a sufficient proof in matters of this nature, i might here insist on that process of his, whereby he teaches that the essence of wine may be sever'd from the phlegme and ignoble part by the assistance of congelation: and because much weight has been laid upon this process, not only by _paracelsians_, but other writers, some of whom seem not to have perus'd it themselves, i shall give you the entire passage in the authors own words, as i lately found them in the sixth book of his _archidoxis_, an extract whereof i have yet about me; and it sounds thus. _de vino sciendum est, fæcem phlegmaque ejus esse mineram, & vini substantiam esse corpus in quo conservatur essentia, prout auri in auro latet essentia. juxta quod practicam nobis ad memoriam ponimus, ut non obliviscamur, ad hunc modum: recipe vinum vetustissimum & optimum quod habere poteris, calore saporeque ad placitum, hoc in vas vitreum infundas ut tertiam ejus partem impleat, & sigillo hermetis occlusum in equino ventre mensibus quatuor, & in continuato calore teneatur qui non deficiat. quo peracto, hyeme cum frigus & gelu maxime sæviunt, his per mensem exponatur ut congeletur. ad hunc modum frigus vini spiritum una cum ejus substantia protrudit in vini centrum, ac separat a phlegmate: congelatum abjice, quod vero congelatum non est, id spiritum cum substantia esse judicato. hunc in pelicanum positum in arenæ digestione non adeo calida per aliquod tempus manere finito; postmodum eximito vini magisterium, de quo locuti sumus._ but i dare not _eleu._ lay much weight upon this process, because i have found that if it were true, it would be but seldom practicable in this country upon the best wine: for though this present winter hath been extraordinary cold, yet in very keen frosts accompanied with lasting snowes, i have not been able in any measure to freeze a thin vial full of sack; and even with snow and salt i could freeze little more then the surface of it; and i suppose _eleu._ that tis not every degree of cold that is capable of congealing liquors, which is able to make such an _analysis_ (if i may so call it) of them by separating their aqueous and spirituous parts; for i have sometimes, though not often, frozen severally, red-wine, urine and milk, but could not observe the expected separation. and the dutch-men that were forc'd to winter in that icie region neer the artick circle, call'd _nova zembla_, although they relate, as we shall see below, that there was a separation of parts made in their frozen beer about the middle of _november_, yet of the freezing of their back [errata: sack] in _december_ following they give but this account: _yea and our sack, which is so hot, was frozen very hard, so that when we were every man to have his part, we were forc'd to melt it in the fire; which we shar'd every second day, about half a pinte for a man, wherewith we were forc'd to sustain our selves._ in which words they imply not, that their back [errata: sack] was divided by the frost into differing substances, after such manner as their beer had been. all which notwithstanding, _eleu._ suppose that it may be made to appear, that even cold sometimes may _congregare homogenea, & heterogenea segregare_: and to manifest this i may tell you, that i did once, purposely cause to be decocted in fair water a plant abounding with sulphureous and spirituous parts, and having expos'd the decoction to a keen north-wind in a very frosty night, i observ'd, that the more aqueous parts of it were turn'd by the next morning into ice, towards the innermost part of which, the more agile and spirituous parts, as i then conjectur'd, having retreated, to shun as much as might be their environing enemy, they had there preserv'd themselves unfrozen in the form of a high colour'd liquor, the aqueous and spirituous parts having been so sleightly (blended rather than) united in the decoction, that they were easily separable by such a degree of cold as would not have been able to have divorc'd the parts of urine or wine, which by fermentation or digestion are wont, as tryal has inform'd me, to be more intimately associated each with other. but i have already intimated, _eleutherius_, that i shall not insist on this experiment, not only because, having made it but once i may possibly have been mistaken in it; but also (and that principally) because of that much more full and eminent experiment of the separative virtue of extream cold, that was made, against their wills, by the foremention'd dutch men that winter'd in _nova zembla_; the relation of whose voyage being a very scarce book, it will not be amiss to give you that memorable part of it which concerns our present theme, as i caus'd the passage to be extracted out of the englished voyage it self. "_gerard de veer_, _john cornelyson_ and others, sent out of _amsterdam_, _anno dom._ . being forc'd by unseasonable weather to winter in _nova zembla_, neer ice-haven; on the thirteenth of _october_, three of us (sayes the relation) went aboard the ship, and laded a sled with beer; but when we had laden it, thinking to go to our house with it, suddenly there arose such a winde, and so great a storm and cold, that we were forc'd to go into the ship again, because we were not able to stay without; and we could not get the beer into the ship again, but were forc'd to let it stand without upon the sled: the fourteenth, as we came out of the ship, we found the barrel of beer standing upon the sled, but it was fast frozen at the heads; yet by reason of the great cold, the beer that purg'd out froze as hard upon the side of the barrel, as if it had been glu'd thereon: and in that sort we drew it to our house, and set the barrel an end, and drank it up; but first we were forc'd to melt the beer, for there was scarce any unfrozen beer in the barrel; but in that thick yiest that was unfrozen lay the strength of the beer, so that it was too strong to drink alone, and that which was frozen tasted like water; and being melted we mix'd one with the other, and so drank it; but it had neither strength nor taste." and on this occasion i remember, that having the last very sharp winter purposely try'd to freeze, among other liquors, some beer moderately strong, in glass vessels, with snow and salt, i observ'd, that there came out of the neck a certain thick substance, which, it seems, was much better able then the rest of the liquor (that i found turn'd into ice) to resist a frost, and which, by its colour and consistence seem'd mafestly [transcriber's note: manifestly] enough to be yiest, whereat, i confess, i somewhat marvail'd, because i did not either discerne by the taste, or find by enquiry, that the beer was at all too new to be very fit to be drank. i might confirm the dutchmens relation, by what happen'd a while since to a neere friend of mine, who complained to me, that having brew'd some beer or ale for his own drinking in _holland_ (where he then dwelt) the keenness of the late bitter winter froze the drink so as to reduce it into ice, and a small proportion of a very strong and spirituous liquor. but i must not entertain you any longer concerning cold, not onely because you may think i have but lost my way into a theme which does not directly belong to my present undertaking; but because i have already enlarg'd my self too much upon the first consideration i propos'd, though it appears so much a paradox, that it seem'd to require that i should say much to keep it from being thought a meere extravagance; yet since i undertook but to make the common assumption of our chymists and _aristotelians_ appear questionable, i hope i have so perform'd that task, that i may now proceed to my following considerations, and insist lesse on them than i have done on the first. the sceptical chymist. _the second part._ the second consideration i desire to have notice taken of, is this, that it is not so sure, as both chymists and _aristotelians_ are wont to think it, that every seemingly similar or distinct substance that is separated from a body by the help of the fire, was pre existent in it as a principle or element of it. that i may not make this paradox a greater then i needs must, i will first briefly explain what the proposition means, before i proceed to argue for it. and i suppose you will easily believe that i do not mean that any thing is separable from a body by fire, that was not materially pre-existent in it; for it far exceeds the power of meerly naturall agents, and consequently of the fire, to produce anew, so much as one atome of matter, which they can but modifie and alter, not create; which is so obvious a truth, that almost all sects of philosophers have deny'd the power of producing matter to second causes; and the _epicureans_ and some others have done the like, in reference to their gods themselves. nor does the proposition peremptorily deny but that some things obtain'd by the fire from a mixt body, may have been more then barely materially pre-existent in it, since there are concretes, which before they be expos'd to the fire afford us several documents of their abounding, some with salt, and others with sulphur. for it will serve the present turn, if it appear that diverse things obtain'd from a mixt body expos'd to the fire, were not its ingredients before: for if this be made to appear it, will [errata: appear, it will] be rationall enough to suspect that chymists may decieve themselves, and others, in concluding resolutely and universally, those substances to be the elementary ingredients of bodies barely separated by the fire, of which it yet may be doubted whether there be such or no; at least till some other argument then that drawn from the _analysis_ be brought to resolve the doubt. that then which i mean by the proposition i am explaining, is, that it may without absurdity be doubted whether or no the differing substances obtainable from a concrete dissipated by the fire were so exsistent in it in that forme (at least as to their minute parts) wherein we find them when the _analysis_ is over, that the fire did only dis-joyne and extricate the corpuscles of one principle from those of the other wherewith before they were blended. having thus explain'd my proposition, i shall endeavour to do two things, to prove it; the first of which is to shew that such substances as chymists call principles may be produc'd _de novo_ (as they speak.) and the other is to make it probable that by the fire we may actually obtain from some mixt bodies such substances as were not in the newly expounded sence, pre-existent in them. to begin then with the first of these, i consider that if it be as true as 'tis probable, that compounded bodies differ from one another but in the various textures resulting from the bigness, shape, motion, and contrivance of their smal parts, it will not be irrationall to conceive that one and the same parcel of the universal matter may by various alterations and contextures be brought to deserve the name, somtimes of a sulphureous, and sometimes of a terrene, or aqueous body. and this i could more largely explicate, but that our friend mr. _boyle_ has promis'd us something about qualities, wherein the theme i now willingly resign him, will i question not be studiously enquired into. wherefore what i shall now advance in favour of what i have lately deliver'd shall be deduc'd from experiments made divers years since. the first of which would have been much more considerable, but that by some intervening accidents i was necessitated to lose the best time of the year, for a trial of the nature of that i design'd; it being about he [transcriber's note: the] middle of _may_ before i was able to begin an experiment which should have then been two moneths old; but such as it was, it will not perhaps be impertinent to give you this narrative of it. at the time newly mention'd, i caus'd my gardiner (being by urgent occasions hinder'd from being present myself) to dig out a convenient quantity of good earth, and dry it well in an oven, to weigh it, to put it in an earthen pot almost level with the surface of the ground, and to set in it a selected seed he had before received from me, for that purpose, of squash, which is an indian kind of pompion, that growes apace; this seed i ordered him to water only with rain or spring water. i did not (when my occasions permitted me to visit it) without delight behold how fast it grew, though unseasonably sown; but the hastning winter hinder'd it from attaining any thing neer its due and wonted magnitude; (for i found the same autumn, in my garden, some of those plants, by measure, as big about as my middle) and made me order the having it taken up; which about the middle of _october_ was carefully done by the same gardiner, who a while after sent me this account of it; _i have weighed the pompion with the stalk and leaves, all which weighed three pound wanting a quarter; then i took the earth, baked it as formerly, and found it just as much as i did at first, which made me think i had not dry'd it sufficiently: then i put it into the oven twice more, after the bread was drawn, and weighed it the second time, but found it shrink little or nothing._ but to deal candidly with you, _eleutherius_, i must not conceal from you the event of another experiment of this kind made this present summer, wherein the earth seems to have been much more wasted; as may appear by the following account, lately sent me by the same gardiner, in these words. _to give you an account of your cucumbers, i have gain'd two indifferent fair ones, the weight of them is ten pound and a halfe, the branches with the roots weighed four pounds wanting two ounces; and when i had weighed them i took the earth, and bak'd it in several small earthen dishes in an oven; and when i had so done, i found the earth wanted a pound and a halfe of what it was formerly; yet i was not satisfi'd, doubting the earth was not dry: i put it into an oven the second time, (after the bread was drawn) and after i had taken it out and weighed it, i found it to be the same weight: so i suppose there was no moisture left in the earth. neither do i think that the pound and halfe that was wanting was drawn away by the cucumber but a great part of it in the ordering was in dust (and the like) wasted: (the cucumbers are kept by themselves, lest you should send for them.)_ but yet in this tryal, _eleutherius_, it appears that though some of the earth, or rather the dissoluble salt harbour'd in it, were wasted, the main body of the plant consisted of transmuted water. and i might add, that a year after i caus'd the formerly mentioned experiment, touching large pompions, to be reiterated, with so good success, that if my memory does not much mis-inform me, it did not only much surpass any that i made before, but seem'd strangely to conclude what i am pleading for; though (by reason i have unhappily lost the particular account my gardiner writ me up of the circumstances) i dare not insist upon them. the like experiment may be as conveniently try'd with the seeds of any plant, whose growth is hasty, and its size bulky. if tobacco will in these cold climates grow well in earth undung'd, it would not be amiss to make a tryal with it; for 'tis an annual plant, that arises where it prospers, sometimes as high as a tall man; and i have had leaves of it in my garden neer a foot and a halfe broad. but the next time i try this experiment, it shall be with several seeds of the same sort, in the same pot of earth, that so the event may be the more conspicuous. but because every body has not conveniency of time and place for this experiment neither, i made in my chamber, some shorter and more expeditions [transcriber's note: expeditious] tryals. i took a top of spearmint, about an inch long, and put it into a good vial full of spring water, so as the upper part of the mint was above the neck of the glass, and the lower part immers'd in the water; within a few dayes this mint began to shoot forth roots into the water, and to display its leaves, and aspire upwards; and in a short time it had numerous roots and leaves, and these very strong and fragrant of the odour of the mint: but the heat of my chamber, as i suppose, kill'd the plant when it was grown to have a pretty thick stalk, which with the various and ramified roots, which it shot into the water as if it had been earth, presented in its transparent flower-pot a spectacle not unpleasant to behold. the like i try'd with sweet marjoram, and i found the experiment succeed also, though somewhat more slowly, with balme and peniroyal, to name now no other plants. and one of these vegetables, cherish'd only by water, having obtain'd a competent growth, i did, for tryals sake, cause to be distill'd in a small retort, and thereby obtain'd some phlegme, a little empyreumaticall spirit, a small quantity of adust oyl, and a _caput mortuum_; which appearing to be a coal concluded it to consist of salt and earth: but the quantity of it was so small that i forbore to calcine it. the water i us'd to nourish this plant was not shifted nor renewed; and i chose spring-water rather than rain-water, because the latter is more discernably a kinde of [greek: panspermia], which, though it be granted to be freed from grosser mixtures, seems yet to contain in it, besides the steams of several bodies wandering in the air, which may be suppos'd to impregnate it, a certain spirituous substance, which may be extracted out of it, and is by some mistaken for the spirit of the world corporify'd, upon what grounds, and with what probability, i may elsewhere perchance, but must not now, discourse to you. but perhaps i might have sav'd a great part of my labour. for i finde that _helmont_ (an author more considerable for his experiments than many learned men are pleas'd to think him) having had an opportunity to prosecute an experiment much of the same nature with those i have been now speaking of, for five years together, obtain'd at the end of that time so notable a quantity of transmuted water, that i should scarce think it fit to have his experiment, and mine mention'd together, were it not that the length of time requisite to this may deterr the curiosity of some, and exceed the leasure of others; and partly, that so paradoxical a truth as that which these experiments seem to hold forth, needs to be confirm'd by more witnesses then one, especially since the extravagancies and untruths to be met with in _helmonts_ treatise of the magnetick cure of wounds, have made his testimonies suspected in his other writings, though as to some of the unlikely matters of fact he delivers in them, i might safely undertake to be his compurgator. but that experiment of his which i was mentioning to you, he sayes, was this. he took pound of earth dry'd in an oven, and having put it into an earthen vessel and moisten'd it with raine water he planted in it the trunk of a willow tree of five pound weight; this he water'd, as need required, with rain or with distill'd water; and to keep the neighbouring earth from getting into the vessell, he employ'd a plate of iron tinn'd over and perforated with many holes. five years being efflux'd, he took out the tree and weighed it, and (with computing the leaves that fell during four autumnes) he found it to weigh pound, and about three ounces. and having again dry'd the earth it grew in, he found it want of its former weight of pound, about a couple only of ounces; so that pound of the roots, wood, and bark, which constituted the tree, seem to have sprung from the water. and though it appears not that _helmont_ had the curiosity to make any _analysis_ of this plant, yet what i lately told you i did to one of the vegetables i nourish'd with water only, will i suppose keep you from doubting that if he had distill'd this tree, it would have afforded him the like distinct substances as another vegetable of the same kind. i need not subjoyne that i had it also in my thoughts to try how experiments to the same purpose with those i related to you would succeed in other bodies then vegetables, because importunate avocations having hitherto hinder'd me from putting my design in practise, i can yet speak but confecturally [transcriber's note: conjecturally] of the success: but the best is, that the experiments already made and mention'd to you need not the assistance of new ones, to verifie as much as my present task makes it concern me to prove by experiments of this nature. one would suspect (sayes _eleutherius_ after his long silence) by what you have been discoursing, that you are not far from _helmonts_ opinion about the origination of compound bodies, and perhaps too dislike not the arguments which he imployes to prove it. what _helmontian_ opinion, and what arguments do you mean (askes _carneades_.) what you have been newly discoursing (replies _eleutherius_) tells us, that you cannot but know that this bold and acute spagyrist scruples not to assert that all mixt bodies spring from one element; and that vegetables, animals, marchasites, stones, metalls, &c. are materially but simple water disguis'd into these various formes, by the plastick or formative virtue of their seeds. and as for his reasons you may find divers of them scatter'd up and down his writings; the considerabl'st of which seem to be these three; the ultimate reduction of mixt bodies into insipid water, the vicissitude of the supposed elements, and the production of perfectly mixt bodies out of simple water. and first he affirmes that the _sal circulatus paracelsi_, or his liquor _alkahest_, does adequately resolve plants, animals, and mineralls into one liquor or more, according to their several internall disparities of parts (without _caput mortuum_, or the destruction of their seminal virtues;) and that the _alkahest_ being abstracted from these liquors in the same weight and virtue wherewith it dissolv'd them, the liquors may by frequent cohobations from chalke or some other idoneous matter, be totally depriv'd of their seminal endowments, and return at last to their first matter, insipid water; some other wayes he proposes here and there, to divest some particular bodies of their borrow'd shapes, and make them remigrate to their first simplicity. the second topick whence _helmont_ drawes his arguments, to prove water to be the material cause of mixt bodies, i told you was this, that the other suppos'd elements may be transmuted into one another. but the experiments by him here and there produc'd on this occasion, are so uneasie to be made and to be judg'd of, that i shall not insist on them; not to mention, that if they were granted to be true, his inference from them is somewhat disputable; and therefore i shall pass on to tell you, that as, in his first argument, our paradoxical author endeavours to prove water the sole element of mixt bodies, by their ultimate resolution, when by his _alkahest_, or some other conquering agent, the seeds have been destroy'd, which disguis'd them, or when by time those seeds are weari'd or exantlated or unable to act their parts upon the stage of the universe any longer: so in his third argument he endeavours to evince the same conclusion, by the constitution of bodies which he asserts to be nothing but water subdu'd by seminal virtues. of this he gives here and there in his writings several instances, as to plants and animals; but divers of them being difficult either to be try'd or to be understood, and others of them being not altogether unobnoxious to exceptions, i think you have singl'd out the principal and less questionable experiment when you lately mention'd that of the willow tree. and having thus, continues _eleutherius_, to answer your question, given you a summary account of what i am confident you know better then i do, i shall be very glad to receive your sence of it, if the giving it me will not too much divert you from the prosecution of your discourse. that _if_ (replies _carneades_) was not needlessly annex'd: for thorowly to examine such an hypothesis and such arguments would require so many considerations, and consequently so much time, that i should not now have the liesure [errata: leasure] to perfect such a digression, and much less to finish my principle [errata: principal] discourse. yet thus much i shall tell you at present, that you need not fear my rejecting this opinion for its novelty; since, however the _helmontians_ may in complement to their master pretend it to be a new discovery, yet though the arguments be for the most part his, the opinion it self is very antient: for _diogenes laertius_ and divers other authors speak of _thales_, as the first among the _græcians_ that made disquisitions upon nature. and of this _thales_, i remember, _tully_[ ] informes us, that he taught all things were at first made of water. and it seems by _plutarch_ and _justin martyr_, that the opinion was ancienter then he: for they tell us that he us'd to defend his tenet by the testimony of _homer_. and a greek author, (the _scholiast_ of _apollonius_) upon these words [greek: ex iliou [transcriber's note: iluos] eblastêse chthôn autê],[ ] _the earth of slime was made,_ affirms (out of _zeno_) that the _chaos_, whereof all things were made, was, according to _hesiod_, water; which, settling first, became slime, and then condens'd into solid earth. and the same opinion about the generation of slime seems to have been entertain'd by _orpheus_, out of whom one of the antients[ ] cites this testimony, [greek: ek tou hydatos ilui katistê.] _of water slime was made._ [footnote : de natura deorum.] [footnote : argonaut. .] [footnote : athenagoras.] it seems also by what is delivered in _strabo_[ ] out of another author, concerning the _indians_, that they likewise held that all things had differing beginnings, but that of which the world was made, was water. and the like opinion has been by some of the antients ascrib'd to the _phoenicians_, from whom _thales_ himself is conceiv'd to have borrow'd it; as probably the greeks did much of their theologie, and, as i am apt to think, of their philosophy too; since the devising of the atomical _hypothesis_ commonly ascrib'd to _lucippus_ and his disciple _democritus_, is by learned men attributed to one _moschus_ a _phoenician_. and possibly the opinion is yet antienter than so; for 'tis known that the _phoenicians_ borrow'd most of their learning from the _hebrews_. and among those that acknowledge the books of _moses_, many have been inclin'd to think water to have been the primitive and universal matter, by perusing the beginning of _genesis_, where the waters seem to be mention'd as the material cause, not only of sublunary compounded bodies, but of all those that make up the universe; whose component parts did orderly, as it were, emerge out of that vast abysse, by the operation of the spirit of god, who is said to have been moving himself as hatching females do (as the original [hebrew: merachephet], _meracephet_[ ] is said to import, and as it seems to signifie in one of the two other places, wherein alone i have met with it in the hebrew bible)[ ] upon the face of the waters; which being, as may be suppos'd, divinely impregnated with the seeds of all things, were by that productive incubation qualify'd to produce them. but you, i presume, expect that i should discourse of this matter like a naturalist, not a philologer. wherefore i shall add, to countenance _helmont's_ opinion, that whereas he gives not, that i remember, any instance of any mineral body, nor scarce of any animal, generated of water, a french chymist, _monsieur de rochas_, has presented his readers an experiment, which if it were punctually such as he has deliver'd it, is very notable. he then, discoursing of the generation of things according to certain chymical and metaphorical notions (which i confess are not to me intelligible) sets down, among divers speculations not pertinent to our subject, the following narrative, which i shall repeat to you the sence of in english, with as little variation from the literal sence of the french words, as my memory will enable me. _having_ (sayes he) _discern'd such great wonders by the natural operation of water, i would know what may be done with it by art imitating nature. wherefore i took water which i well knew not to be compounded, nor to be mix'd with any other thing than that spirit of life_ (whereof he had spoken before;) _and with a heat artificial, continual and proportionate, i prepar'd and dispos'd it by the above mention'd graduations of coagulation, congelation, and fixation, untill it was turn'd into earth, which earth produc'd animals, vegetables and minerals. i tell not what animals, vegetables and minerals, for that is reserv'd for another occasion: but the animals did move of themselves, eat, &c.--and by the true anatomie i made of them, i found that they were compos'd of much sulphur, little mercury, and less salt.--the minerals began to grow and encrease by converting into their own nature one part of the earth thereunto dispos'd; they were solid and heavy. and by this truly demonstrative science, namely chymistry, i found that they were compos'd of much salt, little sulphur, and less mercury._ [footnote : universarum rerum primordia diverta esse, faciendi autem mundi initium aquam. strabo. geograp. lib. . circa medium.] [footnote : deuter. . .] [footnote : jerem. . .] but (sayes _carneades_) i have some suspitions concerning this strange relation, which make me unwilling to declare an opinion of it, unless i were satisfied concerning divers material circumstances that our author has left unmentioned; though as for the generation of living creatures, both vegetable and sensitive, it needs not seem incredible, since we finde that our common water (which indeed is often impregnated with variety of seminal principles and rudiments) being long kept in a quiet place will putrifie and stink, and then perhaps too produce moss and little worms, or other insects, according to the nature of the seeds that were lurking in it. i must likewise desire you to take notice, that as _helmont_ gives us no instance of the production of minerals out of water, so the main argument that he employ's to prove that they and other bodies may be resolv'd into water, is drawn from the operations of his _alkahest_, and consequently cannot be satisfactorily examin'd by you and me. yet certainly (sayes _eleutherius_) you cannot but have somewhat wonder'd as well as i, to observe how great a share of water goes to the making up of divers bodies, whose disguises promise nothing neere so much. the distillation of eeles, though it yielded me some oyle, and spirit, and volatile salt, besides the _caput mortuum_, yet were all these so disproportionate to the phlegm that came from them (and in which at first they boyl'd as in a pot of water) that they seem'd to have bin nothing but coagulated phlegm, which does likewise strangely abound in vipers, though they are esteem'd very hot in operation, and will in a convenient aire survive some dayes the loss of their heads and hearts, so vigorous is their vivacity. mans bloud it self as spirituous, and as elaborate a liquor as 'tis reputed, does so abound in phlegm, that, the other day, distilling some of it on purpose to try the experiment (as i had formerly done in deers bloud) out of about seven ounces and a half of pure bloud we drew neere six ounces of phlegm, before any of the more operative principles began to arise, and invite us to change the receiver. and to satisfie my self that some of these animall phlegms were void enough of spirit to deserve that name, i would not content my self to taste them only, but fruitlesly pour'd on them acid liquors, to try if they contain'd any volatile salt or spirit, which (had there been any there) would probably have discover'd it self by making an ebullition with the affused liquor. and now i mention corrosive spirits, i am minded to informe you, that though they seem to be nothing else but fluid salts, yet they abound in water, as you may observe, if either you entangle, and so fix their saline part, by making them corrode some idoneous body, or else if you mortifie it with a contrary salt; as i have very manifestly observ'd in the making a medecine somewhat like _helmont's balsamus samech_, with distill'd vinager instead of spirit of wine, wherewith he prepares it: for you would scarce beleeve (what i have lately observ'd) that of that acid spirit, the salt of tartar, from which it is distill'd, will by mortifying and retaining the acid salt turn into worthless phlegm neere twenty times its weight, before it be so fully impregnated as to rob no more distill'd vinager of its salt. and though spirit of wine exquisitely rectify'd seem of all liquors to be the most free from water, it being so igneous that it will flame all away without leaving the least drop behinde it, yet even this fiery liquor is by _helmont_ not improbably affirm'd, in case what he relates be true, to be materially water, under a sulphureous disguise: for, according to him, in the making that excellent medecine, _paracelsus_ his _balsamus samech_, (which is nothing but _sal tartari_ dulcify'd by distilling from it spirit of wine till the salt be sufficiently glutted with its sulphur, and suffer [errata: and till it suffer] the liquor to be drawn off, as strong as it was pour'd on) when the salt of tartar from which it is distill'd hath retain'd, or depriv'd it of the sulphureous parts of the spirit of wine, the rest, which is incomparably the greater part of the liquor, will remigrate into phlegm. i added that clause [_in case what he relates be true_] because i have not as yet sufficiently try'd it my self. but not only something of experiment keeps me from thinking it, as many chymists do, absurd, (though i have, as well as they, in vain try'd it with ordinary salt of tartar;) but besides that _helmont_ often relates it, and draws consequences from it; a person noted for his sobernesse and skill in spagyrical preparations, having been askt by me, whether the experiment might not be made to succeed, if the salt and spirit were prepar'd according to a way suitable to my principles, he affirm'd to me, that he had that way i propos'd made _helmont's_ experiment succeed very well, without adding any thing to the salt and spirit. but our way is neither short nor easie. i have indeed (sayes _carneades_) sometimes wonder'd to see how much phlegme may be obtain'd from bodies by the fire. but concerning that phlegme i may anon have occasion to note something, which i therefore shall not now anticipate. but to return to the opinion of _thales_, and of _helmont_, i consider, that supposing the _alkahest_ could reduce all bodies into water, yet whether that water, because insipid, must be elementary, may not groundlesly be doubted; for i remember the candid and eloquent _petrus laurembergius_ in his notes upon _sala's_ aphorismes affirmes, that he saw an insipid _menstruum_ that was a powerfull dissolvent, and (if my memory do not much mis-informe me) could dissolve gold. and the water which may be drawn from quicksilver without addition, though it be almost tastless, you will i believe think of a differing nature from simple water, especially if you digest in it appropriated mineralls. to which i shall add but this, that this consideration may be further extended. for i see no necessity to conceive that the water mention'd in the beginning of _genesis_, as the universal matter, was simple and elementary water; since though we should suppose it to have been an agitated congeries or heap consisting of a great variety of seminal principles and rudiments, and of other corpuscles fit to be subdu'd and fashion'd by them, it might yet be a body fluid like water, in case the corpuscles it was made up of, were by their creator made small enough, and put into such an actuall motion as might make them glide along one another. and as we now say, the sea consists of water, notwithstanding [errata: (notwithstanding] the saline, terrestrial, and other bodies mingl'd with it,) such a liquor may well enough be called water, because that was the greatest of the known bodies whereunto it was like; though, that a body may be fluid enough to appear a liquor, and yet contain corpuscles of a very differing nature, you will easily believe, if you but expose a good quantity of vitriol in a strong vessel to a competent fire. for although it contains both aqueous, earthy, saline, sulphureous, and metalline corpuscles, yet the whole mass will at first be fluid like water, and boyle like a seething pot. i might easily (continues _carneades_) enlarge my self on such considerations, if i were now oblig'd to give you my judgment of the _thalesian_, and _helmontian_, _hypothesis_. but whether or no we conclude that all things were at first generated of water, i may deduce from what i have try'd concerning the growth of vegetables, nourish'd with water, all that i now propos'd to my self or need at present to prove, namely that salt, spirit, earth, and ev'n oyl (though that be thought of all bodies the most opposite to water) may be produc'd out of water; and consequently that a chymical principle as well as a peripatetick element, may (in some cases) be generated anew, or obtain'd from such a parcel of matter as was not endow'd with the form of such a principle or element before. and having thus, _eleutherius_, evinc'd that 'tis possible that such substances as those that chymists are wont to call their _tria prima_, may be generated, anew: i must next endeavour to make it probable, that the operation of the fire does actually (sometimes) not only divide compounded bodies into smal parts, but compound those parts after a new manner; whence consequently, for ought we know, there may emerge as well saline and sulphureous substances, as bodies of other textures. and perhaps it will assist us in our enquiry after the effects of the operations of the fire upon other bodies, to consider a little, what it does to those mixtures which being productions of the art of man, we best know the composition of. you may then be pleas'd to take notice that though sope is made up by the sope-boylers of oyle or grease, and salt, and water diligently incorporated together, yet if you expose the mass they constitute to a graduall fire in a retort, you shall then indeed make a separation, but not of the same substances that were united into sope, but of others of a distant and yet not an elementary nature, and especially of an oyle very sharp and fætid, and of a very differing quality from that which was employ'd to make the sope: fo [errata: so] if you mingle in a due proportion, _sal armoniack_ with quick-lime, and distill them by degrees of fire, you shall not divide the _sal armoniack_ from the quick-lime, though the one be a volatile, and the other a fix'd substance, but that which will ascend will be a spirit much more fugitive, penetrant, and stinking, then _sal armoniack_; and there will remain with the quick-lime all or very near all the sea salt that concurr'd to make up the _sal armoniack_; concerning which sea salt i shall, to satisfie you how well it was united to the lime, informe you, that i have by making the fire at length very vehement, caus'd both the ingredients to melt in the retort it self into one mass and such masses are apt to relent in the moist air. if it be here objected, that these instances are taken from factitious concretes which are more compounded then those which nature produces; i shall reply, that besides that i have mention'd them as much to illustrate what i propos'd, as to prove it, it will be difficult to evince that nature her self does not make decompound bodies, i mean mingle together such mixt bodies as are already compounded of elementary, or rather of more simple ones. for vitriol (for instance) though i have sometimes taken it out of minerall earths, where nature had without any assistance of art prepar'd it to my hand, is really, though chymists are pleas'd to reckon it among salts, a de-compounded body consisting (as i shall have occasion to declare anon) of a terrestriall substance, of a metal, and also of at least one saline body, of a peculiar and not elementary nature. and we see also in animals, that their blood may be compos'd of divers very differing mixt bodies, since we find it observ'd that divers sea-fowle tast rank of the fish on which they ordinarily feed; and _hipocrates_ himself observes, that a child may be purg'd by the milke of the nurse, if she have taken _elaterium_; which argues that the purging corpuscles of the medicament concurr to make up the milke of the nurse; and that white liquor is generally by physitians suppos'd to be but blanch'd and alter'd blood. and i remember i have observ'd, not farr from the _alps_, that at a certain time of the year the butter of that country was very offensive to strangers, by reason of the rank tast of a certain herb, whereon the cows were then wont plentifully to feed. but (proceeds _carneades_) to give you instances of another kind, to shew that things may be obtain'd by the fire from a mixt body that were not pre-existent in it, let me remind you, that from many vegetables there may without any addition be obtain'd glass, a body, which i presume you will not say was pre-existent in it, but produc'd by the fire. to which i shall add but this one example more, namely that by a certain artificial way of handling quicksilver, you may without addition separate from it at least a th. or th. part of a clear liquor, which with an ordinary peripatetick would pass for water, and which a vulgar chymist would not scruple to call phlegme, and which, for ought i have yet seen or heard, is not reducible into mercury again, and consequently is more then a disguise of it. now besides that divers chymists will not allow mercury to have any or at least any considerable quantity of either of the ignoble ingredients, earth and water; besides this, i say, the great ponderousness of quicksilver makes it very unlikely that it can have so much water in it as may be thus obtain'd from it, since mercury weighs or times as much as water of the same bulk. nay for a further confirmation of this argument, i will add this strange relation, that two friends of mine, the one a physitian, and the other a mathematician, and both of them persons of unsuspected credit, have solemnly assured me, that after many tryals they made, to reduce mercury into water, in order to a philosophicall work, upon gold (which yet, by the way, i know prov'd unsuccesfull) they did once by divers cohobations reduce a pound of quicksilver into almost a pound of water, and this without the addition of any other substance, but only by pressing the mercury by a skillfully manag'd fire in purposely contriv'd vessels. but of these experiments our friend (sayes _carneades_, pointing at the register of this dialogue) will perhaps give you a more particular account then it is necessary for me to do: since what i have now said may sufficiently evince, that the fire may sometimes as well alter bodies as divide them, and by it we may obtain from a mixt body what was not pre-existent in it. and how are we sure that in no other body what we call phlegme is barely separated, not produc'd by the action of the fire: since so many other mixt bodies are of a much less constant, and more alterable nature, then mercury, by many tricks it is wont to put upon chymists, and by the experiments i told you of, about an hour since, appears to be. but because i shall ere long have occasion to resume into consideration the power of the fire to produce new concretes, i shall no longer insist on this argument at present; only i must mind you, that if you will not dis-believe _helmonts_ relations, you must confess that the _tria prima_ are neither ingenerable nor incorruptible substances; since by his _alkahest_ some of them may be produc'd of bodies that were before of another denomination; and by the same powerfull _menstruum_ all of them may be reduc'd into insipid water. here _carneades_ was about to pass on to his third consideration, when _eleutherius_ being desirous to hear what he could say to clear his second general consideration from being repugnant to what he seem'd to think the true theory of mistion, prevented him by telling him, i somewhat wonder, _carneades_, that you, who are in so many points unsatisfied with the peripatetick opinion touching the elements and mixt bodies, should also seem averse to that notion touching the manner of mistion, wherein the chymists (though perhaps without knowing that they do so) agree with most of the antient philosophers that preceded _aristotle_, and that for reasons so considerable, that divers modern naturalists and physitians, in other things unfavourable enough to the spagyrists, do in this case side with them against the common opinion of the schools. if you should ask me (continues _eleutherius_) what reasons i mean? i should partly by the writings of _sennertus_ and other learned men, and partly by my own thoughts, be supply'd with more, then 'twere at present proper for me to insist largely on. and therefore i shall mention only, and that briefly, three or four. of these, i shall take the first from the state of the controversie itself, and the genuine notion of mistion, which though much intricated by the schoolmen, i take in short to be this, _aristotle_, at least as many of his interpreters expound him, and as indeed he teaches in some places, where he professedly dissents from the antients, declares mistion to be such a mutual penetration, and perfect union of the mingl'd elements, that there is no portion of the mixt body, how minute soever, which does not contain all, and every of the four elements, or in which, if you please, all the elements are not. and i remember, that he reprehends the mistion taught by the ancients, as too sleight or gross, for this reason, that bodies mixt according to their _hypothesis_, though they appear so to humane eyes, would not appear such to the acute eyes of a _lynx_, whose perfecter sight would discerne the elements, if they were no otherwise mingled, than as his predecessors would have it, to be but blended, not united; whereas the antients, though they did not all agree about what kind of bodies were mixt, yet they did almost unanimously hold, that in a compounded bodie, though the _miscibilia_, whether elements, principles, or whatever they pleas'd to call them, were associated in such small parts, and with so much exactness, that there was no sensible part of the mass but seem'd to be of the same nature with the rest, and with the whole; yet as to the atomes, or other insensible parcels of matter, whereof each of the _miscibilia_ consisted, they retain'd each of them its own nature, being but by apposition or _juxta_-position united with the rest into one bodie. so that although by virtue of this composition the mixt body did perhaps obtain divers new qualities, yet still the ingredients that compounded it, retaining their own nature, were by the destruction of the _compositum_ separable from each other, the minute parts disingag'd from those of a differing nature, and associated with those of their own sort returning to be again, fire, earth, or water, as they were before they chanc'd to be ingredients of that _compositum_. this may be explain'd (continues _eleutherius_,) by a piece of cloath made of white and black threds interwoven, wherein though the whole piece appear neither white nor black, but of a resulting colour, that is gray, yet each of the white and black threds that compose it, remains what it was before, as would appear if the threds were pull'd asunder, and sorted each colour by it self. this (pursues _eleutherius_) being, as i understand it, the state of the controversie, and the _aristotelians_ after their master commonly defining, that mistion is _miscibilium alteratorum unio_, that seems to comport much better with the opinion of the chymists, then with that of their adversaries, since according to that as the newly mention'd example declares, there is but a _juxta_-position of separable corpuscles, retaining each its own nature, whereas according to the _aristotelians_, when what they are pleas'd to call a mixt body results from the concourse of the elements, the _miscibilia_ cannot so properly be said to be alter'd, as destroy'd, since there is no part in the mixt body, how small soever, that can be call'd either fir [transcriber's note: fire], or air, or water, or earth. nor indeed can i well understand, how bodies can be mingl'd other wayes then as i have declar'd, or at least how they can be mingl'd, as our peripateticks would have it. for whereas _aristotle_ tells us, that if a drop of wine be put into ten thousand measures of water, the wine being overpower'd by so vast a quantity of water will be turn'd into it, he speaks to my apprehension, very improbably; for though one should add to that quantity of water as many drops of wine as would a thousand times exceed it all, yet by his rule the whole liquor should not be a _crama_, a mixture of wine and water, wherein the wine would be predominant, but water only; since the wine being added but by a drop at a time would still fall into nothing but water, and consequently would be turn'd into it. and if this would hold in metals too, 'twere a rare secret for goldsmiths, and refiners; for by melting a mass of gold, or silver, and by but casting into it lead or antimony, grain after grain, they might at pleasure, within a reasonable compass of time, turn what quantity they desire, of the ignoble into the noble metalls. and indeed since a pint of wine, and a pint of water, amount to about a quart of liquor, it seems manifest to sense, that these bodies doe not totally penetrate one another, as one would have it; but that each retains its own dimensions; and consequently, that they are by being mingl'd only divided into minute bodies, that do but touch one another with their surfaces, as do the grains, of wheat, rye, barley, &c. in a heap of severall sorts of corn: and unless we say, that as when one measure of wheat, for instance, is blended with a hundred measures of barley, there happens only a _juxta_-position and superficial contact betwixt the grains of wheat, and as many or thereabouts of the grains of barley. so when a drop of wine is mingl'd with a great deal of water, there is but an apposition of so many vinous corpuscles to a correspondent number of aqueous ones; unless i say this be said, i see not how that absurdity will be avoyded, whereunto the stoical notion of mistion (namely by [greek: synchysis] [errata: [greek: synchysis]], or confusion) was liable, according to which the least body may be co-extended with the greatest: since in a mixt body wherein before the elements were mingl'd there was, for instance, but one pound of water to ten thousand of earth, yet according to them there must not be the least part of that compound, that consisted not as well of earth, as water. but i insist, perhaps, too long (sayes _eleutherius_) upon the proofs afforded me by the nature of mistion: wherefore i will but name two or three other arguments; whereof the first shall be, that according to _aristotle_ himself, the motion of a mixt body followes the nature of the predominant element, as those wherein the earth prevails, tend towards the centre of heavy bodies. and since many things make it evident, that in divers mixt bodies the elementary qualities are as well active, though not altogether so much so as in the elements themselves, it seems not reasonable to deny the actual existence of the elements in those bodies wherein they operate. to which i shall add this convincing argument, that experience manifests, and _aristotle_ confesses it, that the _miscibilia_ may be again separated from a mixt body, as is obvious in the chymical resolutions of plants and animalls, which could not be unless they did actually retain their formes in it: for since, according to _aristotle_, and i think according to truth, there is but one common mass of all things, which he has been pleas'd to call _materia prima_; and since tis not therefore the matter but the forme that constitutes and discriminates things, to say that the elements remain not in a mixt body, according to their formes, but according to their matter, is not to say that they remain there at all; since although those portions of matter were earth and water, &c. before they concurr'd, yet the resulting body being once constituted, may as well be said to be simple as any of the elements, the matter being confessedly of the same nature in all bodies, and the elementary formes being according to this _hypothesis_ perish'd and abolish'd. and lastly, and if we will consult chymical experiments, we shall find the advantages of the chymical doctrine above the peripatetick title little less then palpable. for in that operation that refiners call quartation, which they employ to purifie gold, although three parts of silver be so exquisitely mingl'd by fusion with a fourth part of gold (whence the operation is denominated) that the resulting mass acquires severall new qualities, by virtue of the composition, and that there is scarce any sensible part of it that is not compos'd of both the metalls; yet if you cast this mixture into _aqua fortis_, the silver will be dissolv'd in the _menstruum_, and the gold like a dark or black powder will fall to the bottom of it, and either body may be again reduc'd into such a metal as it was before, which shews: that it retain'd its nature, notwithstanding its being mixt _per minima_ with the other: we likewise see, that though one part of pure silver be mingled with eight or ten parts, or more, of lead, yet the fire will upon the cuppel easily and perfectly separate them again. and that which i would have you peculiarly consider on this occasion is, that not only in chymicall anatomies there is a separation made of the elementary ingredients, but that some mixt bodies afford a very much greater quantity of this or that element or principle than of another; as we see, that turpentine and amber yield much more oyl and sulphur than they do water, whereas wine, which is confess'd to be a perfectly mixt bodie, yields but a little inflamable spirit, or sulphur, and not much more earth; but affords a vast proportion of phlegm or water: which could not be, if as the peripateticks suppose, every, even of the minutest particles, were of the same nature with the whole, and consequently did contain both earth and water, and aire, and fire; wherefore as to what _aristotle_ principally, and almost only objects, that unless his opinion be admitted, there would be no true and perfect mistion, but onely aggregates or heaps of contiguous corpuscles, which, though the eye of man cannot discerne, yet the eye of a _lynx_ might perceive not to be of the same nature with one another and with their _totum_, as the nature of mistion requires, if he do not beg the question, and make mistion to consist in what other naturalists deny to be requisite to it, yet he at least objects that as a great inconvenience which i cannot take for such, till he have brought as considerable arguments as i have propos'd to prove the contrary, to evince that nature makes other mistions than such as i have allowed, wherein the _miscibilia_ are reduc'd into minute parts, and united as farr as sense can discerne: which if you will not grant to be sufficient for a true mistion, he must have the same quarrel with nature her self, as with his adversaries. wherefore (continues _eleutherius_) i cannot but somewhat marvail that _carneades_ should oppose the doctrine of the chymist in a particular, wherein they do as well agree with his old mistress, nature, as dissent from his old adversary, _aristotle_. i must not (replies _carneades_) engage my self at present to examine thorowly the controversies concerning mistion: and if there were no third thing, but that i were reduc'd to embrace absolutely and unreservedly either the opinion of _aristotle_, or that of the philosophers that went before him, i should look upon the latter, which the chymists have adopted, as the more defensible opinion: but because differing in the opinions about the elements from both parties, i think i can take a middle course, and discourse to you of mistion after a way that does neither perfectly agree, nor perfectly disagree with either, as i will not peremptorily define, whether there be not cases wherein some _phænomena_ of mistion seem to favour the opinion that the chymists patrons borrow'd of the antients, i shall only endeavour to shew you that there are some cases which may keep the doubt, which makes up my second general consideration from being unreasonable. i shall then freely acknowledge to you (sayes _carneades_) that i am not over well satisfi'd with the doctrine that is ascribed to _aristotle_, concerning mistion, especially since it teaches that the four elements may again be separated from the mixt body; whereas if they continu'd not in it, it would not be so much a separation as a production. and i think the ancient philosophers that preceded _aristotle_, and chymists who have since receiv'd the same opinion, do speak of this matter more intelligibly, if not more probably, then the peripateticks: but though they speak congruously enough, to their believing, that there are a certain number of primogeneal bodies, by whose concourse all those we call mixts are generated, and which in the destruction of mixt bodies do barely part company, and recede from one another, just such as they were when they came together; yet i, who meet with very few opinions that i can entirely acquiesce in, must confess to you that i am inclin'd to differ not only from the _aristotelians_, but from the old philosophers and the chymists, about the nature of mistion: and if you will give me leave, i shall briefly propose to you my present notion of it, provided you will look upon it, not so much as an assertion as an _hypothesis_; in talking of which i do not now pretend to propose and debate the whole doctrine of mistion, but to shew that 'tis not improbable, that sometimes mingl'd substances may be so strictly united, that it doth not by the usuall operations of the fire, by which chymists are wont to suppose themselves to have made the _analyses_ of mixt bodies, sufficiently appear, that in such bodies the _miscibilia_ that concurr'd to make them up do each of them retain its own peculiar nature: and by the _spagyrists_ fires may be more easily extricated and recover'd, than alter'd, either by a change of texture in the parts of the same ingredient, or by an association with some parts of another ingredient more strict than was that of the parts of this or that _miscibile_ among themselves. at these words _eleu._ having press'd him to do what he propos'd, and promis'd to do what he desir'd; i consider then (resumes _carneades_) that, not to mention those improper kinds of mistion, wherein _homogeneous_ bodies are joyn'd, as when water is mingl'd with water, or two vessels full of the same kind of wine with one another, the mistion i am now to discourse of seems, generally speaking, to be but an union _per minima_ of any two or more bodies of differing denominations; as when ashes and sand are colliquated into glass or antimony, and iron into _regulus martis_, or wine and water are mingl'd, and sugar is dissolv'd in the mixture. now in this general notion of mistion it does not appear clearly comprehended, that the _miscibilia_ or ingredients do in their small parts so retain their nature and remain distinct in the compound, that they may thence by the fire be again taken asunder: for though i deny not that in some mistions of certain permanent bodies this recovery of the same ingredients may be made, yet i am not convinc'd that it will hold in all or even in most, or that it is necessarily deducible from chymicall experiments, and the true notion of mistion. to explain this a little, i assume, that bodies may be mingl'd, and that very durably, that are not elementary or resolv'd [errata: nor have been resolved] into elements or principles that they may be mingl'd; as is evident in the _regulus_ of colliquated antimony, and iron newly mention'd; and in gold coyne, which lasts so many ages; wherein generally the gold is alloy'd by the mixture of a quantity, greater or lesser, (in our mints they use about a th. part) of either silver, or copper, or both. next, i consider, that there being but one universal matter of things, as 'tis known that the _aristotelians_ themselves acknowledge, who call it _materia prima_ (about which nevertheless i like not all their opinions,) the portions of this matter seem to differ from one another, but in certain qualities or accidents, fewer or more; upon whose account the corporeal substance they belong to receives its denomination, and is referr'd to this or that particular sort of bodies; so that if it come to lose, or be depriv'd of those qualities, though it ceases not to be a body, yet it ceases from being that kind of body as a plant, or animal; or red, green, sweet, sowre, or the like. i consider that it very often happens that the small parts of bodies cohere together but by immediate contact and rest; and that however, there are few bodies whose minute parts stick so close together, to what cause soever their combination be ascrib'd, but that it is possible to meet with some other body, whose small parts may get between them, and so dis-joyn them; or may be fitted to cohere more strongly with some of them, then those some do with the rest; or at least may be combin'd so closely with them, as that neither the fire, nor the other usual instruments of chymical anatomies will separate them. these things being promis'd, i will not peremptorily deny, but that there may be some clusters of particles, wherein the particles are so minute, and the coherence so strict, or both, that when bodies of differing denominations, and consisting of such durable clusters, happen to be mingl'd, though the compound body made up of them may be very differing from either of the ingredients, yet each of the little masses or clusters may so retain its own nature, as to be again separable, such as it was before. as when gold and silver being melted together in a due proportion (for in every proportion, the refiners will tell you that the experiment will not succeed) _aqua fortis_ will dissolve the silver, and leave the gold untoucht; by which means, as you lately noted, both the metalls may be recover'd from the mixed mass. but (continues _carneades_) there are other clusters wherein the particles stick not so close together, but that they may meet with corpuscles of another denomination, which are dispos'd to be more closely united with some of them, then they were among themselves. and in such case, two thus combining corpuscles losing that shape, or size, or motion, or other accident, upon whose account they were endow'd with such a determinate quality or nature, each of them really ceases to be a corpuscle of the same denomination it was before; and from the coalition of these there may emerge a new body, as really one, as either of the corpuscles was before they were mingl'd, or, if you please, confounded: since this concretion is really endow'd with its own distinct qualities, and can no more by the fire, or any other known way of _analysis_, be divided again into the corpuscles that at first concurr'd to make it, than either of them could by the same means be subdivided into other particles. but (sayes _eleutherius_) to make this more intelligible by particular examples; if you dissolve copper in _aqua fortis_, or spirit of nitre, (for i remember not which i us'd, nor do i think it much material) you may by crystalizing the solution obtain a goodly vitriol; which though by virtue of the composition it have manifestly diverse qualities, not to be met with in either of the ingredients, yet it seems that the nitrous spirits, or at least many of them, may in this compounded mass retain their former nature; for having for tryal sake distill'd this vitrioll spirit, there came over store of red fumes, which by that colour, by their peculiar stinke, and by their sourness, manifested themselves to be, nitrous spirits; and that the remaining calx continu'd copper, i suppose you'l easily beleeve. but if you dissolve _minium_, which is but lead powder'd by the fire, in good spirit of vinager, and crystalize the solution, you shall not only have a saccharine salt exceedingly differing from both its ingredients; but the union of some parts of the _menstruum_ with some of those of the metal is so strict, that the spirit of vinager seems to be, as such, destroy'd, since the saline corpuscles have quite lost that acidity, upon whose account the liquor was call'd spirit of vinager; nor can any such acid parts as were put to the _minium_ be separated by any known way from the _saccharum saturni_ resulting from them both; for not only there is no sowrness at all, but an admirable sweetness to be tasted in the concretion; and not only i found not that spirit of wine, which otherwise will immediately hiss when mingl'd with strong spirit of vinager, would hiss being pour'd upon _saccharum saturni_, wherein yet the acid salt of vinager, did it survive, may seem to be concentrated; but upon the distillation of _saccharum saturni_ by its self i found indeed a liquor very penetrant, but not at all acid, and differing as well in smell and other qualities, as in tast, from the spirit of vinager; which likewise seem'd to have left some of its parts very firmly united to the _caput mortuum_, which though of a leaden nature was in smell, colour, &c. differing from _minium_; which brings into my mind, that though two powders, the one blew, and the other yellow, may appear a green mixture, without either of them losing its own colour, as a good microscope has sometimes inform'd me; yet having mingl'd _minium_ and _sal armoniack_ in a requisite proportion, and expos'd them in a glass vessel to the fire, the whole mass became white, and the red corpuscles were destroy'd; for though the calcin'd lead was separable from the salt, yet you'l easily beleeve it did not part from it in the forme of a red powder, such as was the _minium_, when it was put to the _sal armoniack_. i leave it also to be consider'd, whether in blood, and divers other bodies, it be probable, that each of the corpuscles that concurr to make a compound body doth, though some of them in some cases may, retain its own nature in it, so that chymsts [transcriber's note: chymists] may extricate each sort of them from all the others, wherewith it concurr'd to make a body of one denomination. i know there may be a distinction betwixt matter _immanent_, when the material parts remain and retain their own nature in the things materiated, as some of the schoolmen speak, (in which sence wood, stones and lime are the matter of a house,) and _transient_, which in the materiated thing is so alter'd, as to receive a new forme, without being capable of re-admitting again the old. in which sence the friends of this distinction say, that _chyle_ is the matter of blood, and blood that of a humane body, of all whose parts 'tis presum'd to be the aliment. i know also that it may be said, that of material principles, some are _common_ to all mixt bodies, as _aristotles_ four elements, or the chymists _tria prima_; others _peculiar_, which belong to this or that sort of bodies; as butter and a kind of whey may be said to be the proper principles of cream: and i deny not, but that these distinctions may in some cases be of use; but partly by what i have said already, and partly by what i am to say, you may easily enough guess in what sence i admit them, and discerne that in such a sence they will either illustrate some of my opinions, or at least will not overthrow any of them. to prosecute then what i was saying before, i will add to this purpose, that since the major part of chymists credit, what those they call philosophers affirme of their stone, i may represent to them, that though when common gold and lead are mingled together, the lead may be sever'd almost un-alter'd from the gold; yet if instead of gold a _tantillum_ of the red _elixir_ be mingled with the saturn, their union will be so indissoluble in the perfect gold that will be produc'd by it, that there is no known, nor perhaps no possible way of separating the diffus'd _elixir_ from the fixed lead, but they both constitute a most permanent body, wherein the saturne seems to have quite lost its properties that made it be call'd lead, and to have been rather transmuted by the _elixir_, then barely associated to it. so that it seems not alwayes necessary, that the bodies that are put together _per minima_, should each retain its own nature; so as when the mass it self is dissipated by the fire, to be more dispos'd to re-appear in its pristine forme, then in any new one, which by a stricter association of its parts with those of some of the other ingredients of the _compositum_, then with one another, it may have acquired. and if it be objected, that unless the _hypothesis_ i oppose be admitted, in such cases as i have proposed there would not be an union but a destruction of mingled bodies, which seems all one as to say, that of such bodies there is no mistion at all; i answer, that _though_ the substances that are mingl'd remain, only their accidents are destroy'd, and _though_ we may with tollerable congruity call them _miscibilia_, because they are distinct bodies before they are put together, however afterwards they are so confounded that i should rather call them concretions, or resulting bodies, than mixt ones; and _though_, perhaps, some other and better account may be propos'd, upon which the name of mistion may remain; yet if what i have said be thought reason, i shall not wrangle about words, though i think it fitter to alter a terme of art, then reject a new truth, because it suits not with it. if it be also objected that this notion of mine, concerning mixtion, though it may be allow'd, when bodies already compounded are put to be mingl'd, yet it is not applicable to those mixtions that are immediately made of the elements, or principles themselves; i answer in the first place, that i here consider the nature of mixtion somewhat more generally, then the chymists, who yet cannot deny that there are oftentimes mixtures, and those very durable ones, made of bodies that are not elementary. and in the next place, that though it may be probably pretended that in those mixtures that are made immediately of the bodies that are call'd principles or elements, the mingl'd ingredients may better retain their own nature in the compounded mass, and be more easily separated from thence; yet, besides that it may be doubted, whether there be any such primary bodies, i see not why the reason i alleadg'd, of the destructibility of the ingredients of bodies in general, may not sometimes be applicable to salt sulphur or mercury; 'till it be shewn upon what account we are to believe them priviledged. and however, (if you please but to recall to mind, to what purpose i told you at first, i meant to speak of mistion at this time) you will perhaps allow that what i have hitherto discoursed about it may not only give some light to the nature of it in general (especially when i shall have an opportunity to declare to you my thoughts on that subject more fully) but may on some occasions also be serviceable to me in the insuing part of this discourse. but, to look back now to that part of our discourse, whence this excursion concerning mistion has so long diverted us, though we there deduc'd, from the differing substances obtained from a plant nourished only with water, and from some other things, that it was not necessary that nature should alwaies compound a body at first of all such differing bodies as the fire could afterwards make it afford; yet this is not all that may be collected from those experiments. for from them there seems also deducible something that subverts an other foundation of the chymical doctrine. for since that (as we have seen) out of fair water alone, not only spirit, but oyle, and salt, and earth may be produced; it will follow that salt and sulphur are not primogeneal bodies, and principles, since they are every day made out of plain water by the texture which the seed or seminal principle of plants puts it into. and this would not perhaps seem so strange, if through pride, or negligence, we were not wont to overlook the obvious and familiar workings of nature; for if we consider what slight qualities they are that serve to denominate one of the _tria prima_, we shall find that nature do's frequently enough work as great alterations in divers parcells of matter: for to be readily dissoluble in water, is enough to make the body that is so, passe for a salt. and yet i see not why from a new shufling and disposition of the component particles of a body, it should be much harder for nature to compose a body dissoluble in water, of a portion of water that was not so before, then of the liquid substance of an egg, which will easily mix with water, to produce by the bare warmth of a hatching hen, membrans, feathers, tendons, and other parts, that are not dissoluble in water as that liquid substance was: nor is the hardness and brittleness of salt more difficult for nature to introduce into such a yielding body as water, then it is for her to make the bones of a chick out of the tender substance of the liquors of an egg. but instead of prosecuting this consideration, as i easily might, i will proceed, as soon as i have taken notice of an objection that lies in my way. for i easily foresee it will be alledged, that the above mentioned examples are all taken from plants, and animals, in whom the matter is fashioned by the plastick power of the seed, or something analogous thereunto. whereas the fire do's not act like any of the seminal principles, but destroyes them all, when they come within its reach. but to this i shall need at present to make but this easy answer, that whether it be a seminal principle, or any other which fashions that matter after those various manners i have mentioned to you, yet 'tis evident, that either by the plastick principle alone, or that and heat together, or by some other cause capable to contex the matter, it is yet possible that the matter may be anew contriv'd into such bodies. and 'tis only for the possibility of this that i am now contending. the sceptical chymist. _the third part._ what i have hitherto discours'd, _eleutherius_, (sayes his friend to him) has, i presume, shew'n you, that a considering man may very well question the truth of those very suppositions which chymists as well as peripateticks, without proving, take for granted; and upon which depends the validity of the inferences they draw from their experiments. wherefore having dispach't that, which though a chymist perhaps will not, yet i do, look upon as the most important, as well as difficult, part of my task, it will now be seasonable for me to proceed to the consideration of the experiments themselves, wherein they are wont so much to triumph and glory. and these will the rather deserve a serious examination, because those that alledge them are wont to do it with so much confidence and ostentation, that they have hitherto impos'd upon almost all persons, without excepting philosophers and physitians themselves, who have read their books, or heard them talk. for some learned men have been content rather to beleeve what they so boldly affirm, then be at the trouble and charge, to try whether or no it be true. others again, who have curiosity enough to examine the truth of what is averr'd, want skill and opportunity to do what they desire. and the generality even of learned men, seeing the chymists (not contenting themselves with the schools to amuse the world with empty words) actually perform'd divers strange things, and, among those resolve compound bodies into several substances not known by former philosophers to be contain'd in them: men i say, seeing these things, and hearing with what confidence chymists averr the substances obtain'd from compound bodies by the fire to be the true elements, or, (as they speak) hypostaticall principles of them, are forward to think it but just as well as modest, that according to the _logicians_ rule, the skilfull _artists_ should be credited in their own art; especially when those things whose nature they so confidently take upon them to teach others are not only productions of their own skill, but such as others know not else what to make of. but though (continues _carneades_) the chymists have been able upon some or other of the mention'd acounts, not only to delight but amaze, and almost to bewitch even learned men; yet such as you and i, who are not unpractis'd in the trade, must not suffer our selves to be impos'd upon by hard names, or bold assertions; nor to be dazl'd by that light which should but assist us to discern things the more clearly. it is one thing to be able to help nature to produce things, and another thing to understand well the nature of the things produc'd. as we see, that many persons that can beget children, are for all that as ignorant of the number and nature of the parts, especially the internal ones, that constitute a childs body, as they that never were parents. nor do i doubt, but you'l excuse me, if as i thank the chymists for the things their _analysis_ shews me, so i take the liberty to consider how many, and what they are, without being astonish'd at them; as if, whosoever hath skill enough to shew men some new thing of his own making, had the right to make them believe whatsoever he pleases to tell them concerning it. wherefore i will now proceed to my third general consideration, which is, that it does not appear, that _three_ is precisely and universally the number of the distinct substances or elements, whereinto mixt bodies are resoluble by the fire; i mean that 'tis not prov'd by chymists, that all the compound bodies, which are granted to be perfectly mixt, are upon their chymical _analysis_ divisible each of them into just three distinct substances, neither more nor less, which are wont to be lookt upon as elementary, or may as well be reputed so as those that are so reputed. which last clause i subjoyne, to prevent your objecting, that some of the substances i may have occasion to mention by and by, are not perfectly homogeneous, nor consequently worthy of the name of principles. for that which i am now to consider, is, into how many differing substances, that may plausibly pass for the elementary ingredients of a mix'd body, it may be analyz'd by the fire; but whether each of these be un-compounded, i reserve to examine, when i shall come to the next general consideration; where i hope to evince, that the substances which the chymists not only allow, but assert to be the component principles of the body resolv'd into them, are not wont to be uncompounded. now there are two kind of arguments (pursues _carneades_) which may be brought to make my third proposition seem probable; one sort of them being of a more speculative nature, and the other drawn from experience. to begin then with the first of these. but as _carneades_ was going to do as he had said, _eleutherius_ interrupted him, by saying with a somewhat smiling countenance; if you have no mind i should think, that the proverb, _that good wits have bad memories_, is rational and applicable to you, you must not forget now you are upon the speculative considerations, that may relate to the number of the elements; that your self did not long since deliver and concede some propositions in favour of the chymical doctrine, which i may without disparagement to you think it uneasie, even for _carneades_ to answer. i have not, replies he, forgot the concessions you mean; but i hope too, that you have not forgot neither with what cautions they were made, when i had not yet assumed the person i am now sustaining. but however, i shall to content you, so discourse of my third general consideration, as to let you see, that i am not unmindful of the things you would have me remember. to talk then again according to such principles as i then made use of, i shall represent, that if it be granted rational to suppose, as i then did, that the elements consisted at first of certain small and primary coalitions of the minute particles of matter into corpuscles very numerous, and very like each other, it will not be absurd to conceive, that such primary clusters may be of far more sorts then three or five; and consequently, that we need not suppose, that in each of the compound bodies we are treating of there should be found just three sorts of such primitive coalitions, as we are speaking of. and if according to this notion we allow a considerable number of differing elements, i may add, that it seems very possible, that to the constitution of one sort of mixt bodies two kinds of elementary ones may suffice (as i lately exemplify'd to you, in that most durable concrete, glass,) another sort of mixts may be compos'd of three elements, another of four, another of five, and another perhaps of many more. so that according to this notion, there can be no determinate number assign'd, as that of the elements; of all sorts of compound bodies whatsoever, it being very probable that some concretes consist of fewer, some of more elements. nay, it does not seem impossible, according to these principles, but that there may be two sorts of mixts, whereof the one may not have any of all the same elements as the other consists of; as we oftentimes see two words, whereof the one has not any one of the letters to be met with in the other; or as we often meet with diverse electuaries, in which no ingredient (except sugar) is common to any two of them. i will not here debate whether there may not be a multitude of these corpuscles, which by reason of their being primary and simple, might be called elementary, if several sorts of them should convene to compose any body, which are as yet free, and neither as yet contex'd and entangl'd with primary corpuscles of other kinds, but remains liable to be subdu'd and fashion'd by seminal principles, or the like powerful and transmuting agent, by whom they may be so connected among themselves, or with the parts of one of the bodies, as to make the compound bodies, whose ingredients they are, resoluble into more, or other elements then those that chymists have hitherto taken notice of. to all which i may add, that since it appears, by what i observ'd to you of the permanency of gold and silver, that even corpuscles that are not of an elementary but compounded nature, may be of so durable a texture, as to remain indissoluble in the ordinary _analysis_ that chymists make of bodies by the fire; 'tis not impossible but that, though there were but three elements, yet there may be a greater number of bodies, which the wonted wayes of anatomy will not discover to be no elementary bodies. but, sayes _carneades_, having thus far, in compliance to you, talk't conjecturally of the number of the elements, 'tis now time to consider, not of how many elements it is possible that nature may compound mix'd bodies, but (at least as farr as the ordinary experiments of chymists will informe us) of how many she doth make them up. i say then, that it does not by these sufficiently appear to me, that there is any one determinate number of elements to be uniformly met with in all the several sorts of bodies allow'd to be perfectly mixt. and for the more distinct proof of this proposition, i shall in the first place represent, that there are divers bodies, which i could never see by fire divided into so many as three elementary substances. i would fain (as i said lately to _philoponus_) see that fixt and noble metal we call gold separated into salt, sulphur and mercury: and if any man will submit to a competent forfeiture in case of failing, i shall willingly in case of prosperous successe pay both for the materials and the charges of such an experiment. 'tis not, that after what i have try'd my self i dare peremptorily deny, that there may out of gold be extracted a certain substance, which i cannot hinder chymists from calling its tincture or sulphur; and which leaves the remaining body depriv'd of its wonted colour. nor am i sure, that there cannot be drawn out of the same metal a real quick and running mercury. but for the salt of gold, i never could either see it, or be satisfied that there was ever such a thing separated, _in rerum natura_, by the relation of any credible eye witnesse. and for the several processes that promise that effect, the materials that must be wrought upon are somewhat too pretious and costly to be wasted upon so groundlesse adventures, of which not only the successe is doubtful, but the very possibility is not yet demonstrated. yet that which most deterres me from such tryalls, is not their chargeablenesse, but their unsatisfactorinesse, though they should succeed. for the extraction of this golden salt being in chymists processes prescribed to be effected by corrosive _menstruums_, or the intervention of other saline bodies, it will remain doubtful to a wary person, whether the emergent salt be that of the gold it self; or of the saline bodies or spirits employ'd to prepare it; for that such disguises of metals do often impose upon artists, i am sure _eleutherius_ is not so much a stranger to chymistry as to ignore. i would likewise willingly see the three principles separated from the pure sort of virgin-sand, from _osteocolla_, from refined silver, from quicksilver, freed from its adventitious sulphur, from _venetian_ talk [transcriber's note: talck], which by long detention in an extreme _reverberium_, i could but divide into smaller particles, (not the constituent principles,) nay, which, when i caused it to be kept, i know not how long, in a glasse-house fire, came out in the figure it's lumps had when put in, though alter'd to an almost _amethystine_ colour; and from divers other bodies, which it were now unnecessary to enumerate. for though i dare not absolutely affirme it to be impossible to analyze these bodies into their _tria prima_; yet because, neither my own experiments, nor any competent testimony hath hitherto either taught me how such an _analysis_ may be made, or satisfy'd me, that it hath been so, i must take the liberty to refrain from believing it, till the chymists prove it, or give us intelligible and practicable processes to performe what they pretend. for whilst they affect that _Ænigmatical_ obscurity with which they are wont to puzzle the readers of their divulg'd processes concerning the analyticall preparation of gold or mercury, they leave wary persons much unsatisfyed whether or no the differing substances, they promise to produce, be truly the hypostatical principles, or only some intermixtures of the divided bodies with those employ'd to work upon them, as is evident in the seeming crystalls of silver, and those of mercury; which though by some inconsiderately supposed to be the salts of those metalls, are plainly but mixtures of the metalline bodies, with the saline parts of _aqua fortis_ or other corrosive liquors; as is evident by their being reducible into silver or quicksilver, as they were before. i cannot but confesse (saith _eleutherius_) that though chymists may upon probable grounds affirm themselves able to obtain their _tria prima_, from animals and vegetables, yet i have often wondred that they should so confidently pretend also to resolve all metalline and other mineral bodies into salt, sulphur, and mercury. for 'tis a saying almost proverbial, among those chymists themselves that are accounted philosophers; and our famous countryman _roger bacon_ has particularly adopted it; that _facilius est aurum facere quam destruere_. and i fear, with you, that gold is not the only mineral from which chymists are wont fruitlessly to attempt the separating of their three principles. i know indeed (continues _eleutherius_) that the learned _sennertus_, even in that book where he takes not upon him to play the advocate for the chymists, but the umpier betwixt them and the peripateticks, expresses himself roundly, thus;[ ] _salem omnibus inesse (mixtis scilicet) & ex iis fieri posse omnibus in resolutionibus chymicis versatis notissimum est._ and in the next page, _quod de sale dixi_, saies he, _idem de sulphure dici potest_: but by his favour i must see very good proofs, before i believe such general assertions, how boldly soever made; and he that would convince me of their truth, must first teach me some true and practicable way of separating salt and sulphur from gold, silver, and those many different sort of stones, that a violent fire does not bring to lime, but to fusion; and not only i, for my own part, never saw any of those newly nam'd bodies so resolved; but _helmont_, who was much better vers'd in the chymical anatomizing of bodies then either _sennertus_ or _i_, has somewhere this resolute passage;[ ] _scio_ (saies he) _ex arena, silicibus & saxis, non calcariis, nunquam sulphur aut mercurium trahi posse_; nay _quercetanus_ himself, though the grand stickler for the _tria prima_, has this confession of the irresolubleness of diamonds;[ ] _adamas_ (saith he) _omnium factus lapidum solidissimus ac durissimus ex arctissima videlicet trium principiorum unione ac cohærentia, quæ nulla arte separationis in solutionem principiorum suorum spiritualium disjungi potest._ and indeed, pursues _eleutherius_, i was not only glad, but somewhat surprized to find you inclined to admit that there may be a sulphur and a running mercury drawn from gold; for unlesse you do (as your expression seem'd to intimate) take the word sulphur in a very loose sence, i must doubt whether our chymists can separate a sulphur from gold: for when i saw you make the experiment that i suppose invited you to speak as you did, i did not judge the golden tincture to be the true principle of sulphur extracted from the body, but an aggregate of some such highly colour'd parts of the gold, as a chymist would have called a _sulphur incombustible_, which in plain english seems to be little better than to call it a sulphur and no sulphur. and as for metalline mercuries, i had not _wondred_ at it, though you had expressed much more severity in speaking of them: for i remember that having once met an old and famous artist, who had long been (and still is) chymist to a great monarch, the repute he had of a very honest man invited me to desire him to tell me ingenuously whether or no, among his many labours, he had ever really extracted a true and running mercury out of metalls; to which question he freely replyed, that he had never separated a true mercury from any metal; nor had ever seen it really done by any man else. and though gold is, of all metalls, that, whose mercury chymists have most endeavoured to extract, and which they do the most brag they have extracted; yet the experienced _angelus sala_, in his _spagyrical_ account of the seven _terrestrial_ planets (that is the seven metalls) affords us this memorable testimony, to, our present purpose; _quanquam_ (saies he) _&c. experientia tamen (quam stultorum magistrum [errata: magistram] vocamus) certe comprobavit, mercurium auri adeo fixum, maturum, & arcte cum reliquis ejusdem corporis substantiis conjungi, ut nullo modo retrogredi possit._ to which he sub-joynes, that he himself had seen much labour spent upon that design, but could never see any such mercury produc'd thereby. and i easily beleeve what he annexes; _that he had often seen detected many tricks and impostures of cheating_ alchymists. for, the most part of those that are fond of such _charlatans_, being unskilfull or credulous, or both, 'tis very easie for such as have some skill, much craft, more boldness, and no conscience, to impose upon them; and therefore, though many profess'd _alchymists_, and divers persons of quality have told me that they have made or seen the mercury of gold, or of this or that other metal; yet i have been still apt to fear that either these persons have had a design to deceive others; or have not had skill and circumspection enough to keep themselves from being deceived. [footnote : sennert. lib. de cons. & dissens. pag. .] [footnote : helmon. pag. .] [footnote : quercet. apud billich. in thessalo redivivo. pag. .] you recall to my mind (sayes _carneades_) a certain experiment i once devis'd, innocently to deceive some persons, and let them and others see how little is to be built upon the affirmation of those that are either unskillfull or unwary, when they tell us they have seen _alchymists_ make the mercury of this or that metal; and to make this the more evident, i made my experiment much more slight, short and simple, than the chymists usuall processes to extract metalline mercuries; which operations being commonly more elaborate and intricate, and requiring a much more longer time, give the _alchymists_ a greater opportunity to cozen, and consequently are more obnoxious to the spectators suspicion. and that wherein i endeavour'd to make my experiment look the more like a true _analysis_, was, that i not only pretended as well as others to extract a mercury from the metal i wrought upon, but likewise to separate a large proportion of manifest and inflamable sulphur. i take then, of the filings of copper, about a drachme or two, of common sublimate, powder'd, the like weight, and _sal armoniack_ near about as much as of sublimate; these three being well mingl'd together i put into a small vial with a long neck, or, which i find better, into a glass urinall, which (having first stopped it with cotton) to avoid the noxious fumes, i approach by degrees to a competent fire of well kindled coals, or (which looks better, but more endangers the glass) to the flame of a candle; and after a while the bottom of the glass being held just upon the kindled coals, or in the flame, you may in about a quarter of an hour, or perchance in halfe that time, perceive in the bottom of the glass some running mercury; and if then you take away the glass and break it, you shall find a parcel of quicksilver, perhaps altogether, and perhaps part of it in the pores of the solid mass; you shall find too, that the remaining lump being held to the flame of the candle will readily burn with a greenish flame, and after a little while (perchance presently) will in the air acquire a greenish blew, which being the colour that is ascrib'd to copper, when its body is unlocked, 'tis easie to perswade men that this is the true sulphur of _venus_, especially since not only the salts may be suppos'd partly to be flown away, and partly to be sublim'd to the upper part of the glass, whose inside (will commonly appear whitened by them) but the metal seems to be quite destroy'd, the copper no longer appearing in a metalline forme, but almost in that of a resinous lump; whereas indeed the case is only this, that the saline parts of the sublimate, together with the _sal armoniack_, being excited and actuated by the vehement heat, fall upon the copper, (which is a metal they can more easily corrode, than silver) whereby the small parts of the mercury being freed from the salts that kept them asunder, and being by the heat tumbled up and down after many occursions, they convene into a conspicuous mass of liquor; and as for the salts, some of the more volatile of them subliming to the upper part of the glass, the others corrode the copper, and uniting themselves with it do strangely alter and disguise its metallick form, and compose with it a new kind of concrete inflamable like sulphur; concerning which i shall not now say any thing, since i can referr you to the diligent observations which i remember mr. _boyle_ has made concerning this odde kind of verdigrease. but continues _carneades_ smiling, you know i was not cut out for a mountebank, and therefore i will hasten to resume the person of a sceptick, and take up my discourse where you diverted me from prosecuting it. in the next place, then, i consider, that, as there are some bodies which yield not so many as the three principles; so there are many others, that in their resolution exhibite more principles than three; and that therefore the ternary number is not that of the universal and adequate principles of bodies. if you allow of the discourse i ately [errata: lately] made you, touching the primary associations of the small particles of matter, you will scarce think it improbable, that of such elementary corpuscles there may be more sorts then either three, or four, or five. and if you will grant, what will scarce be deny'd, that corpuscles of a compounded nature may in all the wonted examples of chymists pass for elementary, i see not, why you should think it impossible, that as _aqua fortis_, or _aqua regis_ will make a separation of colliquated silver and gold, though the fire cannot; so there may be some agent found out so subtile and so powerfull, at least in respect of those particular compounded corpuscles, as to be able to resolve them into those more simple ones, whereof they consist, and consequently encrease the number of the distinct substances, whereinto the mixt body has been hitherto thought resoluble. and if that be true, which i recited to you a while ago out of _helmont_ concerning the operations of the _alkahest_, which divides bodies into other distinct substances, both as to number and nature, then the fire does; it will not a little countenance my conjecture. but confining our selves to such wayes of analyzing mix'd bodies, as are already not unknown to chymists, it may without absurdity be question'd, whether besides those grosser elements of bodies, which they call salt sulphur and mercury, there may not be ingredients of a more subtile nature, which being extreamly little, and not being in themselves visible, may escape unheeded at the junctures of the destillatory vessels, though never so carefully luted. for let me observe to you one thing, which though not taken notice of by chymists, may be a notion of good use in divers cases to a naturalist, that we may well suspect, that there may be severall sorts of bodies, which are not immediate objects of any one of our senses; since we see, that not only those little corpuscles that issue out of the loadstone, and perform the wonders for which it is justly admired; but the _effluviums_ of amber, jet, and other electricall concretes, though by their effects upon the particular bodies dispos'd to receive their action, they seem to fall under the cognizance of our sight, yet do they not as electrical immediately affect any of our senses, as do the bodies, whether minute or greater, that we see, feel, taste, &c. but, continues _carneades_, because you may expect i should, as the chymists do, consider only the sensible ingredients of mixt bodies, let us now see, what experience will, even as to these, suggest to us. it seems then questionable enough, whether from grapes variously order'd there may not be drawn more distinct substances by the help of the fire, then from most other mixt bodies. for the grapes themselves being dryed into raysins and distill'd, will (besides _alcali_, phlegm, and earth) yield a considerable quantity of an empyreumatical oyle, and a spirit of a very different nature from that of wine. also the unfermented juice of grapes affords other distil'd liquors then wine doth. the juice of grapes after fermentation will yield a _spiritus ardens_; which if competently rectifyed will all burn away without leaving any thing remaining. the same fermented juice degenerating into vinager, yields an acid and corroding spirit. the same juice turn'd [errata: tunned] up, armes it self with tartar; out of which may be separated, as out of other bodies, phlegme, spirit, oyle, salt and earth: not to mention what substances may be drawn from the vine it self, probably differing from those which are separated from tartar, which is a body by it self, that has few resemblers in the world. and i will further consider that what force soever you will allow this instance, to evince that there are some bodies that yield more elements then others, it can scarce be deny'd but that the major part of bodies that are divisible into elements, yield more then three. for, besides those which the chymists are pleased to name hypostatical, most bodies contain two others, phlegme and earth, which concurring as well as the rest to the constitution of mixts, and being as generally, if not more, found in their _analysis_, i see no sufficient cause why they should be excluded from the number of elements. nor will it suffice to object, as the _paracelsians_ are wont to do, that the _tria prima_ are the most useful elements, and the earth and water but worthlesse and unactive; for elements being call'd so in relation to the constituting of mixt bodies, it should be upon the account of its ingrediency, not of its use, that any thing should be affirmed or denyed to be an element: and as for the pretended uselessness of earth and water, it would be consider'd that usefulnesse, or the want of it, denotes only a respect or relation to us; and therefore the presence, or absence of it, alters not the intrinsick nature of the thing. the hurtful teeth of vipers are for ought i know useless to us, and yet are not to be deny'd to be parts of their bodies; and it were hard to shew of what greater use to us, then phlegme and earth, are those undiscern'd stars, which our new _telescopes_ discover to us, in many blanched places of the sky; and yet we cannot but acknowledge them constituent and considerably great parts of the universe. besides that whether or no the phlegme and earth be immediately useful, but necessary to constitute the body whence they are separated; and consequently, if the mixt body be not useless to us, those constituent parts, without which it could not have been that mixt body, may be said not to be unuseful to us: and though the earth and water be not so conspicuously operative (after separation) as the other three more active principles, yet in this case it will not be amiss to remember the lucky fable of _menemius aggrippa_, of the dangerous sedition of the hands and legs, and other more busie parts of the body, against the seemingly unactive stomack. and to this case also we may not unfitly apply that reasoning of an apostle, to another purpose; _if the ear shall say, because i am not the eye, i am not of the body; is it therefore not of the body? if the whole body were eye, where were the hearing? if the whole were for hearing, where the smelling?_ in a word, since earth and water appear, as clearly and as generally as the other principles upon the resolution of bodies, to be the ingredients whereof they are made up; and since they are useful, if not immediately to us, or rather to physitians, to the bodies they constitute, and so though in somewhat a remoter way, are serviceable to us; to exclude them out of the number of elements, is not to imitate nature. [transcriber's note: see the printer's note (beginning "the authors constant absence") at the end of the book for material that the printer inadvertently omitted from this page.] but, pursues _carneades_, though i think it evident, that earth and phlegme are to be reckon'd among the elements of most animal and vegetable bodies, yet 'tis not upon that account alone, that i think divers bodies resoluble into more substances then three. for there are two experiments, that i have sometimes made to shew, that at least some mixts are divisible into more distinct substances then five. the one of these experiments, though 'twill be more seasonable for me to mention it fully anon, yet in the mean time, i shall tell you thus much of it, that out of two distill'd liquors, which pass for elements of the bodies whence they are drawn, i can without addition make a true yellow and inflamable sulphur, notwithstanding that the two liquors remain afterwards distinct. of the other experiment, which perhaps will not be altogether unworthy your notice, i must now give you this particular account. i had long observ'd, that by the destillation of divers woods, both in ordinary, and some unusuall sorts of vessels, the copious spirit that came over, had besides a strong tast, to be met with in the empyreumaticall spirits of many other bodies, an acidity almost like that of vinager: wherefore i suspected, that though the sowrish liquor distill'd, for instance, from box-wood, be lookt upon by chymists as barely the spirit of it, and therefore as one single element or principle; yet it does really consist of two differing substances, and may be divisible into them; and consequently, that such woods and other mixts as abound with such a vinager, may be said to consist of one element or principle, more then the chymists as yet are aware of; wherefore bethinking my self, how the separation of these two spirits might be made, i quickly found, that there were several wayes of compassing it. but that of them which i shall at present mention, was this, having destill'd a quantity of box-wood _per se_, and slowly rectify'd the sowrish spirit, the better to free it both from oyle and phlegme, i cast into this rectify'd liquor a convenient quantity of powder'd coral, expecting that the acid part of the liquor would corrode the coral, and being associated with it would be so retain'd by it, that the other part of the liquor, which was not of an acid nature, nor fit to fasten upon the corals, would be permitted to ascend alone. nor was i deceiv'd in my expectation; for having gently abstracted the liquor from the coralls, there came over a spirit of a strong smell, and of a tast very piercing, but without any sourness; and which was in diverse qualities manifestly different, not only from a spirit of vinager, but from some spirit of the same wood, that i purposely kept by me without depriving it of its acid ingredient. and to satisfy you, that these two substances were of a very differing nature, i might informe you of several tryals that i made, but must not name some of them, because i cannot do so without making some unseasonable discoveries. yet this i shall tell you at present, that the sowre spirit of _box_, not only would, as i just now related, dissolve corals, which the other would not fasten on, but being pour'd upon salt of tartar would immediately boile and hiss, whereas the other would lye quietly upon it. the acid spirit pour'd upon _minium_ made a sugar of lead, which i did not find the other to do; some drops of this penetrant spirit being mingl'd with some drops of the blew syrup of violets seem'd rather to dilute then otherwise alter the colour; whereas the acid spirit turn'd the syrup of a reddish colour, and would probably have made it of as pure a red as acid salts are wont to do, had not its operation been hindered by the mixture of the other spirit. a few drops of the compound spirit being shaken into a pretty quantity of the infusion of _lignum nephriticum_, presently destroyed all the blewish colour, whereas the other spirit would not take it away. to all which it might be added, that having for tryals sake pour'd fair water upon the corals that remained in the bottom of the glass wherein i had rectifyed the double spirit (if i may so call it) that was first drawn from the box, i found according to my expectation that the acid spirit had really dissolved the corals, and had coagulated with them. for by the affusion of fair water, i obtain'd a solution, which (to note that singularity upon the bye) was red, whence the water being evaporated, there remained a soluble substance much like the ordinary salt of coral, as chymists are pleas'd to call that magistery of corals, which they make by dissolving them in common spirit of vinager, and abstracting the _menstruum ad siccitatem_. i know not whether i should subjoine, on this occasion, that the simple spirit of box, if chymists will have it therefore saline because it has a strong tast, will furnish us with a new kind of saline bodies, differing from those hitherto taken notice of. for whereas of the three chief sorts of salts, the acid, the alcalizate, and the sulphureous, there is none that seems to be friends with both the other two, as i may, e're it be long, have occasion to shew; i did not find but that the simple spirit of box did agree very well (at least as farr as i had occasion to try it) both with the acid and the other salts. for though it would lye very quiet with salt of tartar, spirit of urine, or other bodies, whose salts were either of an alcalizate or fugitive nature; yet did not the mingling of oyle of vitriol it self produce any hissing or effervescence, which you know is wont to ensue upon the affusion of that highly acid liquor upon either of the bodies newly mentioned. i think my self, sayes _eleutherius_, beholden to you, for this experiment; not only because i forsee you will make it helpful to you in the enquiry you are now upon, but because it teaches us a method, whereby we may prepare a numerous sort of new spirits, which though more simple then any that are thought elementary, are manifestly endow'd with peculiar and powerfull qualities, some of which may probably be of considerable use in physick, as well alone, as associated with other things; as one may hopefully guess by the redness of that solution your sour spirit made of corals, and by some other circumstances of your narrative. and suppose (pursues _eleutherius_) that you are not so confin'd, for the separation of the acid parts of these compound spirits from the other, to employ corals; but that you may as well make use of any alcalizate salt, or of pearls, or crabs eyes, or any other body, upon which common spirit of vinager will easily work, and, to speak in an _helmontian_ phrase, exantlate it self. i have not yet tryed, sayes _carneades_, of what use the mention'd liquors may be in physick, either as medicines or as _menstruums_: but i could mention now (and may another time) divers of the tryals that i made to satisfy my self of the difference of these two liquors. but that, as i allow your thinking what you newly told me about corals, i presume you will allow me, from what i have said already, to deduce this corollary; that there are divers compound bodies, which may be resolv'd into four such differing substances, as may as well merit the name of principles, as those to which the chymists freely give it. for since they scruple not to reckon that which i call the compound spirit of box, for the spirit, or as others would have it, the mercury of that wood, i see not, why the acid liquor, and the other, should not each of them, especially that last named, be lookt upon as more worthy to be called an elementary principle; since it must needs be of a more simple nature then the liquor, which was found to be divisible into that, and the acid spirit. and this further use (continues _carneades_) may be made of our experiment to my present purpose, that it may give us a rise to suspect, that since a liquor reputed by the chymists to be, without dispute, homogeneous, is by so slight a way divisible into two distinct and more simple ingredients, some more skilful or happier experimenter then i may find a way either further to divide one of these spirits, or to resolve some or other, if not all, of those other ingredients of mixt bodies, that have hitherto pass'd among chymists for their elements or principles. the sceptical chymist. _the fourth part._ and thus much (sayes _carneades_) may suffice to be said of the _number_ of the distinct substances separable from mixt bodies by the fire: wherefore i now proceed to consider the _nature_ of them, and shew you, that though they seem _homogeneous_ bodies, yet have they not the purity and simplicity that is requisite to elements. and i should immediately proceed to the proof of my assertion, but that the confidence wherewith chymists are wont to call each of the substances we speak of by the name of sulphur or mercury, or the other of the hypostaticall principles, and the intollerabln [errata: intolerable] ambiguity they allow themselves ie [errata: in] their writings and expressions, makes it necessary for me in order to the keeping you either from mistaking me, or thinking i mistake the controversie, to take notice to you and complain of the unreasonable liberty they give themselves of playing with names at pleasure. and indeed if i were oblig'd in this dispute, to have such regard to the phraseology of each particular chymist, as not to write any thing which this or that author may not pretend, not to contradict this or that sence, which he may give as occasion serves to his ambiguous expressions, i should scarce know how to dispute, nor which way to turn myself. for i find that even eminent writers, (such as _raymund lully_, _paracelsus_ and others) do so abuse the termes they employ, that as they will now and then give divers things, one name; so they will oftentimes give one thing, many names; and some of them (perhaps) such, as do much more properly signifie some distinct body of another kind; nay even in technical words or termes of art, they refrain not from this confounding liberty; but will, as i have observ'd, call the same substance, sometimes the sulphur, and sometimes the mercury of a body. and now i speak of mercury, i cannot but take notice, that the descriptions they give us of that principle or ingredient of mixt bodies, are so intricate, that even those that have endeavour'd to pollish and illustrate the notions of the chymists, are fain to confess that they know not what to make of it, either by ingenuous acknowledgments, or descriptions that are not intelligible. i must confess (sayes _eleutherius_) i have, in the reading of _paracelsus_ and other chymical authors, been troubled to find, that such hard words and equivocal expressions, as you justly complain of, do even when they treat of principles, seem to be studiously affected by those writers; whether to make themselves to be admir'd by their readers, and their art appear more venerable and mysterious, or, (as they would have us think) to conceal from them a knowledge themselves judge inestimable. but whatever (sayes _carneades_) these men may promise themselves from a canting way of delivering the principles of nature, they will find the major part of knowing men so vain, as when they understand not what they read, to conclude, that it is rather the writers fault then their own. and those that are so ambitious to be admir'd by the vulgar, that rather then go without the admiration of the ignorant they will expose themselves to the contempt of the learned, those shall, by my consent, freely enjoy their option. as for the mystical writers scrupling to communicate their knowledge, they might less to their own disparagement, and to the trouble of their readers, have conceal'd it by writing no books, then by writing bad ones. if _themistius_ were here, he would not stick to say, that chymists write thus darkly, not because they think their notions too precious to be explain'd, but because they fear that if they were explain'd, men would discern, that they are farr from being precious. and indeed, i fear that the chief reason why chymists have written so obscurely of their three principles, may be, that not having clear and distinct notions of them themselves, they cannot write otherwise then confusedly of what they but confusedly apprehend: not to say that divers of them, being conscious to the invalidity of their doctrine, might well enough discerne that they could scarce keep themselves from being confuted, but by keeping themselves from being clearly understood. but though much may be said to excuse the chymists when they write darkly, and Ænigmatically, about the preparation of their _elixir_, and some few other grand _arcana_, the divulging of which they may upon grounds plausible enough esteem unfit; yet when they pretend to teach the general principles of natural philosophers, this equivocall way of writing is not to be endur'd. for in such speculative enquiries, where the naked knowledge of the truth is the thing principally aim'd at, what does he teach me worth thanks that does not, if he can, make his notion intelligible to me, but by mystical termes, and ambiguous phrases darkens what he should clear up; and makes me add the trouble of guessing at the sence of what he equivocally expresses, to that of examining the truth of what he seems to deliver. and if the matter of the philosophers stone, and the manner of preparing it, be such mysteries as they would have the world believe them, they may write intelligibly and clearly of the principles of mixt bodies in general, without discovering what they call the great work. but for my part (continues _carneades_) what my indignation at this un-philosophical way of teaching principles has now extorted from me, is meant chiefly to excuse my self, if i shall hereafter oppose any particular opinion or assertion, that some follower of _paracelsus_ or any eminent artist may pretend not to be his masters. for, as i told you long since, i am not oblig'd to examine private mens writings, (which were a labour as endless as unprofitable) being only engag'd to examine those opinions about the _tria prima_, which i find those chymists i have met with to agree in most: and i doubt not but my arguments against their doctrine will be in great part easily enough applicable ev'n to those private opinions, which they do not so directly and expresly oppose. and indeed, that which i am now entering upon being the consideration of the things themselves whereinto _spagyrists_ resolve mixt bodies by the fire, if i can shew that these are not of an elementary nature, it will be no great matter what names these or those chymists have been pleased to give them. and i question not that to a wise man, and consequently to _eleutherius_, it will be lesse considerable to know, what men have thought of things, then what they should have thought. in the fourth and last place, then, i consider, that as generally as chymists are wont to appeal to experience, and as confidently as they use to instance the several substances separated by the fire from a mixt body, as a sufficient proof of their being its component elements: yet those differing substances are many of them farr enough from elementary simplicity, and may be yet look'd upon as mixt bodies, most of them also retaining, somewhat at least, if not very much, of the nature of those concretes whence they were forc'd. i am glad (sayes _eleutherius_) to see the vanity or envy of the canting chymists thus discover'd and chastis'd; and i could wish, that learned men would conspire together to make these deluding writers sensible, that they must no longe [transcriber's note: longer] hope with impunity to abuse the world. for whilst such men are quietly permitted to publish books with promising titles, and therein to assert what they please, and contradict others, and ev'n themselves as they please, with as little danger of being confuted as of being understood, they are encourag'd to get themselves a name, at the cost of the readers, by finding that intelligent men are wont for the reason newly mention'd, to let their books and them alone: and the ignorant and credulous (of which the number is still much greater then that of the other) are forward to admire most what they least understand. but if judicious men skill'd in chymical affaires shall once agree to write clearly and plainly of them, and thereby keep men from being stunn'd, as it were, or imposd upon by dark or empty words; 'tis to be hop'd that these men finding that they can no longer write impertinently and absurdly, without being laugh'd at for doing so, will be reduc'd either to write nothing, or books that may teach us something, and not rob men, as formerly, of invaluable time; and so ceasing to trouble the world with riddles or impertinencies, we shall either by their books receive an advantage, or by their silence escape an inconvenience. but after all this is said (continues _eleutherius_) it may be represented in favour of the chymists, that, in one regard the liberty they take in using names, if it be excusable at any time, may be more so when they speak of the substances whereinto their _analysis_ resolves mixt bodies: since as parents have the right to name their own children, it has ever been allow'd to the authors of new inventions, to impose names upon them. and therefore the subjects we speak of being so the productions of the chymist's art, as not to be otherwise, but by it, obtainable; it seems but equitable to give the artists leave to name them as they please: considering also that none are so fit and likely to teach us what those bodies are, as they to whom we ow'd them. i told you already (sayes _carneades_) that there is great difference betwixt the being able to make experiments, and the being able to give a philosophical account of them. and i will not now add, that many a mine-digger may meet, whilst he follows his work, with a gemm or a mineral which he knowes not what to make of, till he shews it a jeweller or a mineralist to be inform'd what it is. but that which i would rather have here observ'd, is, that the chymists i am now in debate with have given up the liberty you challeng'd for them, of using names at pleasure, and confin'd themselves by their descriptions, though but such as they are, of their principles; so that although they might freely have call'd any thing their _analysis_ presents them with, either sulphur, or mercury, or gas, or blas, or what they pleas'd; yet when they have told me that sulphur (for instance) is a primogeneal and simple body, inflamable, odorous, &c. they must give me leave to dis-believe them, if they tell me that a body that is either compounded or uninflamable is such a sulphur; and to think they play with words, when they teach that gold and some other minerals abound with an incombustible sulphur, which is as proper an expression, as a sun-shine night, or fluid ice. but before i descend to the mention of particulars belonging to my fourth consideration, i think it convenient to premise a few generals; some of which i shall the less need to insist on at present, because i have touched on them already. and first i must invite you to take notice of a certain passage in _helmont_;[ ] which though i have not found much heeded by his readers, he himself _mentions_ as a notable thing, and i take to be a very considerable one; for whereas the distill'd oyle of _oyle-olive_, though drawn _per se_ is (as i have try'd) of a very sharp and fretting quality, and of an odious tast, he tells us that simple oyle being only digested with _paracelsus's sal circulatum_, is reduc'd into dissimilar parts, and yields a sweet oyle, very differing from the oyle distill'd, from [errata: distill'd from] sallet oyle; as also that by the same way there may be separated from wine a very sweet and gentle spirit, partaking of a far other and nobler quality then that which is immediately drawn by distillation and call'd _dephlegm'd aqua vitæ_, from whose acrimony this other spirit is exceedingly remote, although the _sal circulatum_ that makes these _anatomies_ be separated from the analyz'd bodies, in the same weight and with the same qualities it had before; which affirmation of _helmont_ if we admit to be true, we must acknowledge that there may be a very great disparity betwixt bodies of the same denomination (as several oyles, or several spirits) separable from compound bodies: for, besides the differences i shall anon take notice of, betwixt those distill'd oyles that are commonly known to chymists, it appears by this, that by means of the _sal circulatum_, there may be quite another sort of oyles obtain'd from the same body; and who knowes but that there may be yet other agents found in nature, by whose help there may, whether by transmutation or otherwise, be obtain'd from the bodies vulgarly call'd mixt, oyles or other substances, differing from those of the same denomination, known either to vulgar chymists, or even to _helmont_ himself: but for fear you should tell me, that this is but a conjecture grounded upon another man's relation, whose truth we have not the means to experiment, i will not insist upon it; but leaving you to consider of it at leasure, i shall proceed to what is next. [footnote : _illud notabile, in vino esse spiritum quendam mitiorem ulterioris & nobilioris qualitatis participem qu[=a] qui immediatè per distillationem elicitur diciturque aqua vitæ dephlegmata, quod facilius in simplici olivarum oleo ad oculum spectatur. quippe distillatum oleum absque laterum aut tigularum [errata: tegularum] additamento, quodque oleum philosophorum dicitur, multum dissert ab ejus oleitate; quæ elicitur prius reducto oleo simplici in partes dissimilares sola digestione & salis circulati paracelsici appositione; siquidem sal circulatum idem in pondere & quantitatibus pristinis ab oleo segregatur postquam oleum olivarum in sui heterogeneitates est dispositum. dulce enim tunc oleum olivarum ex oleo, prout & suavissimus vini spiritus a vino hoc pacto separantur, longéque ab aquæ vitæ acrimoniâ distinctus._--helmont. aura vitalis, pag. .] secondly, then if that be true which was the opinion of _lucippus_, _democritus_, and other prime _anatomists_ of old, and is in our dayes reviv'd by no mean philosophers; namely, that our culinary fire, such as chymists use, consists of swarmes of little bodies swiftly moving, which by their smallness and motion are able to permeate the sollidest and compactest bodies, and even glass it self; if this (i say) be true, since we see that in flints and other concretes, the fiery part is incorporated with the grosser, it will not be irrationall to conjecture, that multitudes of these fiery corpuscles, getting in at the pores of the glass, may associate themselves with the parts of the mixt body whereon they work, and with them constitute new kinds of compound bodies, according as the shape, size, and other affections of the parts of the dissipated body happen to dispose them, in reference to such combinations; of which also there may be the greater number; if it be likewise granted that the corpuscles of the fire, though all exceeding minute, and very swiftly moved, are not all of the same bigness, nor figure. and if i had not weightier considerations to discourse to you of, i could name to you, to countenance what i have newly said, some particular experiments by which i have been deduc'd to think, that the particles of an open fire working upon some bodies may really associate themselves therewith, and add to the quantity. but because i am not so sure, that when the fire works upon bodies included in glasses, it does it by a reall trajection of the fiery corpuscles themselves, through the substance of the glass, i will proceed to what is next to be mention'd. i could (sayes _eleutherius_) help you to some proofes, whereby i think it may be made very probable, that when the fire acts immediately upon a body, some of its corpuscles may stick to those of the burnt body, as they seem to do in quicklime, but in greater numbers, and more permanently. but for fear of retarding your progress, i shall desire you to deferr this enquiry till another time, and proceed as you intended. you may then in the next place (sayes _carneades_) observe with me, that not only there are some bodies, as gold, and silver, which do not by the usual examens, made by fire, discover themselves to be mixt; but if (as you may remember i formerly told you) it be a de-compound body that is dissipable into several substances, by being expos'd to the fire it may be resolv'd into such as are neither elementary, nor such as it was upon its last mixture compounded of; but into new kinds of mixts. of this i have already given you some examples in sope, sugar of lead, and vitrioll. now if we shall consider that there are some bodies, as well natural, (as that i last nam'd) as factitious, manifestly de-compounded; that in the bowells of the earth nature may, as we see she sometimes does, make strange mixtures; that animals are nourish'd with other animals and plants; and, that these themselves have almost all of them their nutriment and growth, _either_ from a certain nitrous juice harbour'd in the pores of the earth, _or_ from the excrements of animalls, _or_ from the putrify'd bodies, either of living creatures or vegetables, _or_ from other substances of a compounded nature; if, i say, we consider this, it may seem probable, that there may be among the works of nature (not to mention those of art) a greater number of de-compound bodies, then men take notice of; and indeed, as i have formerly also observ'd, it does not at all appear, that all mixtures must be of elementary bodies; but it seems farr more probable, that there are divers sorts of compound bodies, even in regard of all or some of their ingredients, consider'd antecedently to their mixture. for though some seem to be made up by the immediate coalitions of the elements, or principles themselves, and therefore may be call'd _prima mista_, or _mista primaria_; yet it seems that many other bodies are mingl'd (if i may so speak) at the second hand, their immediate ingredients being not elementary, but these primary mixts newly spoken of; and from divers of these secondary sort of mixts may result, by a further composition, a third sort, and so onwards. nor is it improbable, that some bodies are made up of mixt bodies, not all of the same order, but of several; as (for instance) a concrete may consist of ingredients, whereof the one may have been a primary, the other a secondary mixt body; (as i have in native cinnaber, by my way of resolving it, found both that courser the [errata: delete "the"] part that seems more properly to be oar, and a combustible sulphur, and a running mercury:) or perhaps without any ingredient of this latter sort, it may be compos'd of mixt bodies, some of them of the first, and some of the third kind; and this may perhaps be somewhat illustrated by reflecting upon what happens in some chymical preparations of those medicines which they call their _bezoardicum's_. for first, they take antimony and iron, which may be look'd upon as _prima mista_; of these they compound a starry _regulus_, and to this they add according to their intention, either gold, or silver, which makes with it a new and further composition. to this they add sublimate, which is it self a de-compound body, (consisting of common quicksilver, and divers salts united by sublimation into a crystalline substance) and from this sublimate, and the other metalline mixtures, they draw a liquor, which may be allow'd to be of a yet more compounded nature. if it be true, as chymists affirm it, that by this art some of the gold or silver mingl'd with the _regulus_ may be carry'd over the helme with it by the sublimate; as indeed a skilfull and candid person complain'd to me a while since, that an experienc'd friend of his and mine, having by such a way brought over a great deal of gold, in hope to do something further with it, which might be gainfull to him, has not only miss'd of his aim, but is unable to recover his volatiliz'd gold out of the antimonial butter, wherewith it is strictly united. now (continues _carneades_) if a compound body consist of ingredients that are not meerly elementary; it is not hard to conceive, that the substances into which the fire dissolves it, though seemingly homogeneous enough, may be of a compounded nature, those parts of each body that are most of kin associating themselves into a compound of a new kind. as when (for example sake) i have caus'd vitrioll and _sal armoniack_, and salt petre to be mingl'd and destill'd together, the liquor that came over manifested it self not to be either spirit of nitre, or of _sal armoniack_, or of vitrioll. for none of these would dissolve crude gold, which yet my liquor was able readily to do; and thereby manifested it self to be a new compound, consisting at least of spirit of nitre, and _sal armoniack_, (for the latter dissolv'd in the former, will work on gold) which nevertheless are not by any known way separable, and consequently would not pass for a mixt body, if we our selves did not, to obtain it, put and distill together divers concretes, whose distinct operations were known before hand. and, to add on this occasion the experiment i lately promis'd you, because it is applicable to our present purpose, i shall acquaint you, that suspecting the common oyle of vitrioll not to be altogether such a simple liquor as chymists presume it, i mingl'd it with an equal or a double quantity (for i try'd the experiment more then once) of common oyle of turpentine, such as together with the other liquor i bought at the drugsters. and having carefully (for the experiment is nice, and somewhat dangerous) distill'd the mixture in a small glass retort, i obtain'd according to my desire, (besides the two liquors i had put in) a pretty quantity of a certain substance, which sticking all about the neck of the retort discover'd it self to be sulphur, not only by a very strong sulphureous smell, and by the colour of brimstone; but also by this, that being put upon a coal, it was immediately kindl'd, and burn'd like common sulphur. and of this substance i have yet by me some little parcells, which you may command and examine when you please. so that from this experiment i may deduce either one, or both of these propositions, that a real sulphur may be made by the conjunction of two such substances as chymists take for elementary, and which did not either of them apart appear to have any such body in it; or that oyle of vitrioll though a distill'd liquor, and taken for part of the saline principle of the concrete that yields it, may yet be so compounded a body as to contain, besides its saline part, a sulphur like common brimstone, which would hardly be it self a simple or un-compounded body. i might (pursues _carneades_) remind you, that i formerly represented it, as possible, that as there may be more elements then five, or six; so the elements of one body may be different from those of another; whence it would follow, that from the resolution of de-compound body [errata: bodies], there may result mixts of an altogether new kind, by the coalition of elements that never perhaps conven'd before. i might, i say, mind you of this, and add divers things to this second consideration; but for fear of wanting time i willingly pretermit them, to pass on to the third, which is this, that the fire does not alwayes barely resolve or take asunder, but may also after a new manner mingle and compound together the parts (whether elementary or not) of the body dissipated by it. this is so evident, sayes _carneades_, in some obvious examples, that i cannot but wonder at their supiness that have not taken notice of it. for when wood being burnt in a chimney is dissipated by the fire into smoke and ashes, that smoke composes soot, which is so far from being any one of the principles of the wood, that (as i noted above) you may by a further _analysis_ separate five or six distinct substances from it. and as for the remaining ashes, the chymists themselves teach us, that by a further degree of fire they may be indissolubly united into glass. 'tis true, that the _analysis_ which the chymists principally build upon is made, not in the open air, but in close vessels; but however, the examples lately produc'd may invite you shrewdly to suspect, that heat may as well compound as dissipate the parts of mixt bodies: and not to tell you, that i have known a vitrification made even in close vessels, i must remind you that the flowers of antimony, and those of sulphur, are very mix'd bodies, though they ascend in close vessells: and that 'twas in stopt glasses that i brought up the whole body of camphire. and whereas it may be objected, that all these examples are of bodies forc'd up in a dry, not a fluid forme, as are the liquors wont to be obtain'd by distillation; i answer, that besides that 'tis possible, that a body may be chang'd from consistent to fluid, or from fluid to consistent, without being otherwise much altered, as may appear by the easiness wherewith in winter, without any addition or separation of visible ingredients, the same substance may be quickly harden'd into brittle ice, and thaw'd again into fluid water; besides this, i say it would be consider'd, that common quick-silver it self, which the eminentest chymists confess to be a mixt body, may be driven over the helme in its pristine forme of quicksilver, and consequently, in that of a liquor. and certainly 'tis possible that very compounded bodies may concur to constitute liquors; since, not to mention that i have found it possible, by the help of a certain _menstruum_, to distill gold it self through a retort, even with a moderate fire: let us but consider what happens in butter of antimony. for if that be carefully rectify'd, it may be reduc'd into a very clear liquor; and yet if you cast a quantity of fair water upon it, there will quickly precipitate a ponderous and vomitive calx, which made before a considerable part of the liquor, and yet is indeed (though some eminent chymists would have it mercurial) an antimonial body carryed over and kept dissolv'd by the salts of the sublimate, and consequently a compounded one; as you may find if you will have the curiosity to examine this white powder by a skilful reduction. and that you may not think that bodies as compounded as flowers of brimstone cannot be brought to concurr to constitute distill'd liquors; and also that you may not imagine with divers learned men that pretend no small skill in chymistry, that at least no mixt body can be brought over the helme, but by corrosive salts, i am ready to shew you, when you please, among other wayes of bringing over flowers of brimstone (perhaps i might add even mineral sulphurs) some, wherein i employ none but oleaginous bodies to make volatile liquors, in which not only the colour, but (which is a much surer mark) the smell and some operations manifest that there is brought over a sulphur that makes part of the liquor. one thing more there is, _eleutherius_, sayes _carneades_, which is so pertinent to my present purpose, that though i have touch'd upon it before, i cannot but on this occasion take notice of it. and it is this, that the qualities or accidents, upon whose account chymists are wont to call a portion of matter by the name of mercury or some other of their principles, are not such but that 'tis possible as great (and therefore why not the like?) may be produc'd by such changes of texture, and other alterations, as the fire may make in the small parts of a body. i have already prov'd, when i discours'd of the second general consideration, by what happens to plants nourish'd only with fair water, and eggs hatch'd into chickens, that by changing the disposition of the component parts of a body, nature is able to effect as great changes in a parcell of matter reputed similar, as those requisite to denominate one of the _tria prima_. and though _helmont_ do somewhere wittily call the fire the destructor and the artificial death of things; and although another eminent chymist and physitian be pleas'd to build upon this, that fire can never generate any thing but fire; yet you will, i doubt not, be of another mind, if you consider how many new sorts of mixt bodies chymists themselves have produc'd by means of the fire: and particularly, if you consider how that noble and permanent body, glass, is not only manifestly produc'd by the violent action of the fire, but has never, for ought we know, been produc'd any other way. and indeed it seems but an inconsiderate assertion of some _helmontians_, that every sort of body of a peculiar denomination must be produc'd by some seminal power; as i think i could evince, if i thought it so necessary, as it is for me to hasten to what i have further to discourse. nor need it much move us, that there are some who look upon whatsoever the fire is employ'd to produce, not as upon natural but artificial bodies. for there is not alwaies such a difference as many imagine betwixt the one and the other: nor is it so easy as they think, clearly to assigne that which properly, constantly, and sufficiently, discriminates them. but not to engage my self in so nice a disquisition, it may now suffice to observe, that a thing is commonly termed artificial, when a parcel of matter is by the artificers hand, or tools, or both, brought to such a shape or form, as he design'd before-hand in his mind: whereas in many of the chymical productions the effect would be produc'd whether the artificer intended it or no; and is oftentimes very much other then he intended or look't for; and the instruments employ'd, are not tools artificially fashion'd and shaped, like those of tradesmen, for this or that particular work; but, for the most part, agents of nature's own providing, and whose chief powers of operation they receive from their own nature or texture, not the artificer. and indeed, the fire is as well a natural agent as seed: and the chymist that imployes it, does but apply natural agents and patients, who being thus brought together, and acting according to their respective natures, performe the worke themselves; as apples, plums, or other fruit, are natural productions, though the gardiner bring and fasten together the sciens of the stock, and both water, and do perhaps divers other wayes contribute to its bearing fruit. but, to proceed to what i was going to say, you may observe with me, _eleutherius_, that, as i told you once before, qualities sleight enough may serve to denominate a chymical principle. for, when they anatomize a compound body by the fire, if they get a substance inflamable, and that will not mingle with water, that they presently call sulphur; what is sapid and dissoluble in water, that must pass for salt; whatsoever is fix'd and indissoluble in water, that they name earth. and i was going to add, that, whatsoever volatile substance they know not what to make of, not to say, whatsoever they please, that they call mercury. but that these qualities may either be produc'd, otherwise then by such as they call seminal agents, or may belong to bodies of a compounded nature, may be shewn, among other instances, in glass made of ashes, where the exceeding strongly-tasted _alcalizate_ salt joyning with the earth becomes insipid, and with it constitutes a body, which though also dry, fixt, and indissoluble in water, is yet manifestly a mixt body; and made so by the fire itself. and i remmember to our present purpose, that _helmont_,[ ] amongst other medicines that he commends, has a short processe, wherein, though the directions for practice are but obscurely intimated; yet i have some reason not to dis-believe the process, without affirming or denying any thing about the vertues of the remedy to be made by it. _quando_ (sayes he) _oleum cinnamomi &c. suo sali alkali miscetur absque omni aqua, trium mensium artificiosa occultaque circulatione, totum in salem volatilem commutatum est, vere essentiam sui simplicis in nobis exprimit, & usque in prima nostri constitutivasese ingerit._ a not unlike processe he delivers in another place; from whence, if we suppose him to say true, i may argue, that since by the fire there may be produc'd a substance that is as well saline and volatile as the salt of harts-horn, blood, &c. which pass for elementary; and since that this volatile salt is really compounded of a chymical oyle and a fixt salt, the one made volatile by the other, and both associated by the fire, it may well be suspected that other substances, emerging upon the dissipation of bodies by the fire, may be new sorts of mixts, and consist of substances of differing natures; and particularly, i have sometimes suspected, that since the volatile salts of blood, harts-horn, &c. are figitive [errata: fugitive] and endow'd with an exceeding strong smell, either that chymists do erroneously ascribe all odours to sulphurs, or that such salts consist of some oyly parts well incorporated with the saline ones. and the like conjecture i have also made concerning spirit of vinager, which, though the chymists think one of the principles of that body, and though being an acid spirit it seems to be much less of kin then volatile salts to sulphurs; yet, not to mention its piercing smell; which i know not with what congruity the chymist will deduce from salt, i wonder they have not taken notice of what their own _tyrocinium chymicum_ teach us concerning the destillation of _saccharum saturni_; out of which _beguinus_[ ] assures us, that he distill'd, besides a very fine spirit, no lesse then two oyles, the one blood-red and ponderous, but the other swimming upon the top of the spirit, and of a yellow colour; of which he sayes that he kept then some by him, to verify what he delivers. and though i remember not that i have had two distinct oyles from sugar of lead, yet that it will though distill'd without addition yield some oyle, disagrees not with my experience. i know the chymists will be apt to pretend, that these oyls are but the volatiliz'd sulphur of the lead; and will perhaps argue it from what _beguinus_ relates, that when the distillation is ended, you'l find a _caput mortuum_ extreamly black, and (as he speaks) _nullius momenti_, as if the body, or at least the chief part of the metal it self were by the distillation carried over the helme. but since you know as well as i that _saccharum saturni_ is a kind of magistery, made only by calcining of lead _per se_, dissolving it in distill'd vinager, and crystalizing the solution; if i had leasure to tell you how differing a thing i did upon examination find the _caput mortuum_, so sleighted by _beguinus_, to be from what he represents it, i believe you would think the conjecture propos'd less probable then one or other of these three; either that this oyle did formerly concur to constitute the spirit of vinager, and so that what passes for a chymical principle may yet be further resoluble into distinct substances; or that some parts of the spirit together with some parts of the lead may constitute a chymical oyle, which therefore though it pass for homogeneous, may be a very compounded body: or at least that by the action of the distill'd vinager and the saturnine calx one upon another, part of the liquor may be so alter'd as to be transmuted from an acid spirit into an oyle. and though the truth of either of the two former conjectures would make the example i have reflected on more pertinent to my present argument; yet you'l easily discern, the third and last conjecture cannot be unserviceable to confirm some other passages of my discourse. [footnote : helmont pag. .] [footnote : tyroc. chym. l. . c. .] to return then to what i was saying just before i mention'd _helmont's_ experiment, i shall subjoyne, that chymists must confess also that in the perfectly dephlegm'd spirit of wine, or other fermented liquors, that which they call the sulphur of the concrete loses, by the fermentation, the property of oyle, (which the chymists likewise take to be the true sulphur of the mixt) of being unminglable with the water. and if you will credit _helmont_,[ ] all [errata: a pound] of the purest spirit of wine may barely by the help of pure salt of tartar (which is but the fixed salt of wine) be resolv'd or transmuted into scarce half an ounce of salt, and as much elementary water as amounts to the remaining part of the mention'd weight. and it may (as i think i formerly also noted) be doubted, whether that fixt and alcalizate salt, which is so unanimously agreed on to be the saline principle of incinerated bodies, be not, as 'tis alcalizate, a production of the fire? for though the tast of tartar, for example, seem to argue that it contains a salt before it be burn'd, yet that salt being very acid is of a quite differing tast from the lixiviate salt of calcin'd tartar. and though it be not truly objected against the chymists, that they obtain all salts they make, by reducing the body they work on into ashes with violent fires, (since hartshorn, amber, blood, and divers other mixts yield a copious salt before they be burn'd to ashes) yet this volatile salt differs much, as we shall see anon, from the fixt alcalizate salt i speak of; which for ought i remember is not producible by any known way, without incineration. 'tis not unknown to chymists, that quicksilver may be precipitated, without addition, into a dry powder, that remains so in water. and some eminent _spagyrists_, and even _raimund lully_ himself, teach, that meerly by the fire quicksilver may in convenient vessels be reduc'd (at least in great part) into a thin liquor like water, and minglable with it. so that by the bare action of the fire, 'tis possible, that the parts of a mixt body should be so dispos'd after new and differing manners, that it may be sometimes of one consistence, sometimes of another; and may in one state be dispos'd to be mingl'd with water, and in another not. i could also shew you, that bodies from which apart chymists cannot obtain any thing that is combustible, may by being associated together, and by the help of the fire, afford an inflamable substance. and that on the other side, 'tis possible for a body to be inflamable, from which it would very much puzzle any ordinary chymist; and perhaps any other, to separate an inflamable principle or ingredient. wherefore, since the principles of chymists may receive their denominations from qualities, which it often exceeds not the power of art, nor alwayes that of the fire to produce; and since such qualities may be found in bodies that differ so much in other qualities from one another, that they need not be allow'd to agree in that pure and simple nature, which principles, to be so indeed, must have; it may justly be suspected, that many productions of the fire that are shew'd us by chymists, as the principles of the concrete that afforded them, may be but a new kind of mixts. and to annex, on this occasion, to these arguments taken from the nature of the thing, one of those which _logicians_ call _ad hominem_, i shall desire you to take notice, that though _paracelsus_ himself, and some that are so mistaken as to think he could not be so, have ventur'd to teach, that not only the bodies here below, but the elements themselves, and all the other parts of the universe, are compos'd of salt, sulphur and mercury; yet the learned _sennertus_, and all the more wary chymists, have rejected that conceit, and do many of them confess, that the _tria prima_ are each of them made up of the four elements; and others of them make earth and water concur with salt, sulphur and mercury, to the constitution of mixt bodies. so that one sort of these _spagyrists_, notwithstanding the specious titles they give to the productions of the fire, do in effect grant what i contend for. and, of the other sort i may well demand, to what kind of bodies the phlegme and dead earth, to be met with in chymical resolutions, are to be referr'd? for either they must say, with _paracelsus_, but against their own concessions as well as against experience, that these are also compos'd of the _tria prima_, whereof they cannot separate any one from either of them; or else they must confess that two of the vastest bodies here below, earth, and water, are neither of them compos'd of the _tria prima_; and that consequently those three are not the universal, and adequate ingredients, neither of all sublunary bodies, nor even of all mixt bodies. [footnote : _ostendi alias, quomodo lib. una aquæ vitæ combibita in sale tartari siccato, vix fiat semuncia salis, cæterum totum corpus fiat aqua elementalis. helmont. in aura vitali._] i know that the chief of these chymists represent, that though the distinct substances into which they divide mixt bodies by the fire, are not pure and homogeneous; yet since the four elements into which the _aristotelians_ pretend to resolve the like bodies by the same agent, are not simple neither, as themselves acknowledge, 'tis as allowable for the chymists to call the one principles, as for the peripateticks to call the other elements; since in both cases the imposition of the name is grounded only upon the predominancy of that element whose name is ascrib'd to it. nor shall i deny, that this argument of the chymists is no ill one against the _aristotelians_. but what answer can it prove to me, who you know am disputing against the _aristotelian_ elements, as the chymicall principles, and must not look upon any body as a true principle or element, but as yet compounded, which is not perfectly homogeneous, but is further resoluble into any number of distinct substances how small soever. and as for the chymists calling a body salt, or sulphur, or mercury, upon pretence that the principle of the same name is predominant in it, that it self is an acknowledgment of what i contend for; namely that these productions of the fire, are yet compounded bodies. and yet whilst this is granted, it is affirm'd, but not prov'd, that the reputed salt, or sulphur, or mercury, consists mainly of one body that deserves the name of a principle of the same denomination. for how do chymists make it appear that there are any such primitive and simple bodies in those we are speaking of; since 'tis upon the matter confess'd by the answer lately made, that these are not such? and if they pretend by reason to evince what they affirm, what becomes of their confident boasts, that the chymists [errata: chymist] (whom they therefore, after _beguinus_, call a _philosophus_ or _opifex sensatus_) can convince our eyes, by manifestly shewing in any mixt body those simple substances he teaches them to be compos'd of? and indeed, for the chymists to have recourse in this case to other proofs then experiments, as it is to wave the grand argument that has all this while been given out for a demonstrative one; so it releases me from the obligation to prosecute a dispute wherein i am not engag'd to examine any but experimentall proofs. i know it may plausibly enough be represented, in favour of the chymists, that it being evident that much the greater part of any thing they call salt, or sulphur, or mercury, is really such; it would be very rigid to deny those substances the names ascribed them, only because of some sleight mixture of another body; since not only the peripateticks call particular parcels of matter elementary, though they acknowledge that elements are not to be anywhere found pure, at least here below; and since especially there is a manifest analogie and resemblance betwixt the bodies obtainable by chymical anatomies and the principles whose names are given them; i have, i say, consider'd that these things may be represented: but as for what is drawn from the custome of the peripateticks, i have already told you, that though it may be employ'd against them, yet it is not available against me who allow nothing to be an element that is not perfectly homogeneous. and whereas it is alledg'd, that the predominant principle ought to give a name to the substance wherein it abounds; i answer, that that might much more reasonably be said, if either we or the chymists had seen nature take pure salt, pure sulphur, and pure mercury, and compound of them every sort of mixt bodies. but, since 'tis to experience that they appeal, we must not take it for granted, that the distill'd oyle (for instance) of a plant is mainly compos'd of the pure principle call'd sulphur, till they have given us an ocular proof, that there is in that sort of plants such an homogeneous sulphur. for as for the specious argument, which is drawn from the resemblance betwixt the productions of the fire, and the respective, either _aristotelian_ elements, or _chymical_ principles, by whose names they are call'd; it will appear more plausible then cogent, if you will but recall to mind the state of the controversie; which is not, whether or no there be obtain'd from mixt bodies certain substances that agree in outward appearance, or in some qualities with quicksilver or brimstone, or some such obvious or copious body; but whether or no all bodies confess'd to be perfectly mixt were compos'd of, and are resoluble into a determinate number of primary unmixt bodies. for, if you keep the state of the question in your eye, you'l easily discerne that there is much of what should be demonstrated, left unprov'd by those chymical experiments we are examining. but (not to repeat what i have already discover'd more at large) i shall now take notice, that it will not presently follow, that because a production of the fire has some affinity with some of the greater masses of matter here below, that therefore they are both of the same nature, and deserve the same name; for the chymists are not content, that flame should be look't upon as a parcel of the element of fire, though it be hot, dry, and active, because it wants some other qualities belonging to the nature of elementary fire. nor will they let the peripateticks call ashes, or quicklime, earth, notwithstanding the many likenesses between them; because they are not tastlesse, as elementary earth ought to be: but if you should ask me, what then it is, that all the chymical anatomies of bodies do prove, if they prove not that they consist of the three principles into which the fire resolves them? i answer, that their dissections may be granted to prove, that some mixt bodies (for in many it will not hold) are by the fire, when they are included in close vessels, (for that condition also is often requisite) dissolube [transcriber's note: dissoluble] into several substances differing in some qualities, but principally in consistence. so that out of most of them may be obtain'd a fixt substance partly saline, and partly insipid, an unctuous liquor, and another liquor or more that without being unctuous have a manifest taste. now if chymists will agree to call the dry and sapid substance salt, the unctous liquor sulphur, and the other mercury, i shall not much quarrel with them for so doing: but if they will tell me that salt, sulphur, and mercury, are simple and primary bodies whereof each mixt body was actually compounded, and which was really in it antecedently to the operation of the fire, they must give me leave to doubt whether (whatever their other arguments may do) their experiments prove all this. and if they will also tell me that the substances their anatomies are wont to afford them, are pure and similar, as principles ought to be, they must give me leave to believe my own senses; and their own confessions, before their bare assertions. and that you may not (_eleutherius_) think i deal so rigidly with them, because i scruple to take these productions of the fire for such as the chymists would have them pass for, upon the account of their having some affinity with them; consider a little with me, that in regard an element or principle ought to be perfectly similar and homogeneous, there is no just cause why i should rather give the body propos'd the name of this or that element or principle, because it has a resemblance to it in some obvious quality, rather then deny it that name upon the account of divers other qualities, wherein the propos'd bodies are unlike; and if you do but consider what sleight and easily producible qualities they are that suffice, as i have already more then once observ'd, to denominate a chymical principle or an element, you'l not, i hope, think my wariness to be destitute either of example, or else of reason. for we see that the chymists will not allow the _aristotelians_ that the salt in ashes ought to be called earth, though the saline and terrestrial part symbolize in weight, in dryness, in fixness and fusibility, only because the one is sapid and dissoluble in water, and the other not: besides, we see that sapidness and volatility are wont to denominate the chymists mercury or spirit; and yet how many bodies, think you, may agree in those qualities which may yet be of very differing natures, and disagree in qualities either more numerous, or more considerable, or both. for not only spirit of nitre, aqua fortis, spirit of salt, spirit of oyle of vitriol, spirit of allome, spirit of vinager, and all saline liquors distill'd from animal bodies, but all the acetous spirits of woods freed from their vinager; all these, i say, and many others must belong to the chymists mercury, though it appear not why some of them should more be comprehended under one denomination then the chymists sulphur, or oyle should likewise be; for their distill'd oyles are also fluid, volatile, and tastable, as well as their mercury; nor is it necessary, that their sulphur should be unctuous or dissoluble in water, since they generally referr spirit of wine to sulphurs, although that spirit be not unctuous, and will freely mingle with water. so that bare inflamability must constitute the essence of the chymists sulphur; as uninflamablenesse joyned with any taste is enough to intitle a distill'd liquor to be their mercury. now since i can further observe to you, that spirit of nitre and spirit of harts-horne being pour'd together will boile and hisse and tosse up one another into the air, which the chymists make signes of great antipathy in the natures of bodies (as indeed these spirits differ much both in taste, smell, and operations;) since i elsewhere tell you of my having made two sorts of oyle out of the same mans blood, that would not mingle with one another; and since i might tell you divers examples i have met with, of the contrariety of bodies which according to the chymists must be huddl'd up together under one denomination; i leave you to judge whether such a multitude of substances as may agree in these sleight qualities, and yet disagree in others more considerable, are more worthy to be call'd by the name of a principle (which ought to be pure and homogeneous,) than to have appellations given them that may make them differ, in name too, from the bodies from which they so wildly differ in nature. and hence also, by the bye, you may perceive that 'tis not unreasonable to distrust the chymists way of argumentation, when being unable to shew us that such a liquor is (for example) purely saline, they prove, that at least salt is much the predominant principle, because that the propos'd substance is strongly tasted, and all tast proceeds from salt; whereas those spirits, such as spirit of tartar, spirit of harts-horn, and the like, which are reckoned to be the mercuries of the bodies that afford them, have manifestly a strong and piercing tast, and so has (according to what i formerly noted) the spirit of box &c. even after the acid liquor that concurr'd to compose it has been separated from it. and indeed, if sapidness belong not to the spirit or mercurial principle of vegitables and animals: i scarce know how it will be discriminated from their phlegm, since by the absence of inflamability it must be distinguish'd from their sulphur, which affords me another example, to prove how unacurate the chymical doctrine is in our present case; since not only the spirits of vegitables and animals, but their oyles are very strongly tasted, as he that shall but wet his tongue with chymical oyle of cinnamon, or of cloves, or even of turpentine, may quickly find, to his smart. and not only i never try'd any chymical oyles whose tast was not very manifest and strong; but a skilful and inquisitive person who made it his business by elaborate operations to depurate chymical oyles, and reduce them to an elementary simplicity, informes us, that he never was able to make them at all tastless; whence i might inferr, that the proof chymists confidently give us of a bodies being saline, is so far from demonstrating the predominancy, that it does not clearly evince so much as the presence of the saline principle in it. but i will not (pursues _carneades_) remind you, that the volatile salt of harts-horn, amber, blood, &c. are exceeding strongly scented, notwithstanding that most chymists deduce odours from sulphur, and from them argue the predominancy of that principle in the odorous body, because i must not so much as add any new examples of the incompetency of this sort of chymical arguments; since having already detain'd you but too long in those generals that appertain to my fourth consideration, 'tis time that i proceed to the particulars themselves, to which i thought fit they should be previous: these generals (continues _carneades_) being thus premis'd, we might the better survey the unlikeness that an attentive and unprepossess'd observer may take notice of in each sort of bodies which the chymists are wont to call the salts or sulphurs or mercuries of the concretes that yield them, as if they had all a simplicity, and identity of nature: whereas salts if they were all elementary would as little differ as do the drops of pure and simple water. 'tis known that both chymists and physitians ascribe to the fixt salts of calcin'd bodies the vertues of their concretes; and consequently very differing operations. so we find the _alkali_ of wormwood much commended in distempers of the stomach; that of eyebright for those that have a weak sight; and that of _guaiacum_ (of which a great quantity yields but a very little salt) is not only much commended in venereal diseases, but is believed to have a peculiar purgative vertue, which yet i have not had occasion to try. and though, i confess, i have long thought, that these _alkalizate_ salts are, for the most part, very neer of kin, and retain very little of the properties of the concretes whence they were separated; yet being minded to observe watchfully whether i could meet with any exceptions to this general observation, i observ'd at the glasse-house, that sometimes the metal (as the workmen call it) or masse of colliquated ingredients, which by blowing they fashion into vessels of divers shapes, did sometimes prove of a very differing colour, and a somewhat differing texture, from what was usuall. and having enquired whether the cause of such accidents might not be derived from the peculiar nature of the fixt salt employ'd to bring the sand to fusion, i found that the knowingst workmen imputed these mis-adventures to the ashes, of [errata: ashes off] some certain kind of wood, as having observ'd the ignobler kind of glass i lately mention'd to be frequently produc'd when they had employ'd such sorts of ashes which therefore they scruple to make use of, if they took notice of them beforehand. i remember also, that an industrious man of my acquaintance having bought a vast quantity of tobacco stalks to make a fixt salt with, i had the curiosity to go see whether that exotick plant, which so much abounds in volatile salt, would afford a peculiar kind of _alcali_; and i was pleas'd to find that in the _lixivium_ of it, it was not necessary, as is usual, to evaporate all the liquor, that there might be obtain'd a saline calx, consisting like lime quench'd in the air of a heap of little corpuscles of unregarded shapes; but the fixt salt shot into figur'd crystal, almost as nitre or _sal-armoniack_ and other uncalcin'd salts are wont to do; and i further remember that i have observ'd in the fixt salt of urine, brought by depuration to be very white, a tast not so unlike to that of common salt, and very differing from the wonted caustick lixiviate tast of other salts made by incineration. but because the instances i have alledg'd of the difference of _alcalizate_ salt are but few, and therefore i am still inclin'd to think, that most chymists and many physitians do, inconsideratly enough and without warrant from experience, ascribe the vertues of the concretes expos'd to calcination, to the salts obtain'd by it; i shall rather, to shew the disparity of salts, mention in the first place the apparent difference betwixt the vegetable fixt salts and the animal volatile ones: as (for example) betwixt salt of tartar, and salt of harts-horn; whereof the former is so fixt that 'twill indure the brunt of a violent fire, and stand in fusion like a metal; whereas the other (besides that it has a differing tast and a very differing smell) is so far from being fixt, that it will fly away in a gentle heat as easily as spirit of wine it self. and to this i shall add, in the next place, that even among the volatile salts themselves, there is a considerable difference, as appears by the distinct properties of (for instance) salt of amber, salt of urine, salt of mans skull, (so much extoll'd against the falling sicknesse) and divers others which cannot escape an ordinary observer. and this diversity of volatile salts i have observ'd to be somtimes discernable even to the eye, in their figures. for the salt of harts-horn i have observ'd to adhere to the receiver in the forme almost of a _parallelipipedon_; and of the volatile salt of humane blood (long digested before distillation, with spirit of wine) i can shew you store of graines of that figure which _geometricians_ call a _rhombus_; though i dare not undertake that the figures of these or other saline crystals (if i may so call them) will be alwaies the same, whatever degree of fire have been employ'd to force them up, or how hastily soever they have been made to convene in the spirits or liquors, in the lower part of which i have usually observ'd them after a while to shoot. and although, as i lately told you, i seldom found any difference, as to medical vertues, in the fixt salts of divers vegetables; and accordingly i have suspected that most of these volatile salts, having so great a resemblance in smell, in tast, and fugitiveness, differ but little, if at all, in their medicinal properties: as indeed i have found them generally to agree in divers of them (as in their being somewhat diaphoretick and very deopilative; [errata: deopilative)] yet i remember _helmont_[ ] somewhere informes us, that there is this difference betwixt the saline spirit of urine and that of mans blood, that the former will not cure the epilepsy, but the latter will. of the efficacy also of the salt of common amber against the same disease in children, (for in grown persons it is not a specifick) i may elsewhere have an occasion to entertain you. and when i consider that to the obtaining of these volatile salts (especially that of urine) there is not requisite such a destructive violence of the fire, as there is to get those salts that must be made by incineration, i am the more invited to conclude, that they may differ from one another, and consequently recede from an elementary simplicity. and, if i could here shew you what mr. _boyle_ has observ'd, touching the various chymicall distinctions of salts; you would quickly discern, not only that chymists do give themselves a strange liberty to call concretes salts, that are according to their own rules to be look'd upon as very compounded bodies; but that among those very salts that seem elementary, because produc'd upon the anatomy of the bodies that yield them, there is not only a visible disparity, but, to speak in the common language, a manifest antipathy or contrariety: as is evident in the ebullition and hissing that is wont to ensue, when the acid spirit of vitrioll, for instance, is pour'd upon pot ashes, or salt of tartar. and i shall beg leave of this gentleman, sayes _carneades_, casting his eyes on me, to let me observe to you out of some of his papers, particularly those wherein he treats of some preparations of urine, that not only one and the same body may have two salts of a contrary nature, as he exemplifies in the spirit and _alkali_ of nitre; but that from the same body there may without addition be obtain'd three differing and visible salts. for he relates, that he observ'd in urine, not only a volatile and crystalline salt, and a fixt salt, but likewise a kind of _sal armoniack_, or such a salt as would sublime in the form of a salt, and therefore was not fixt, and yet was far from being so fugitive as the volatile salt; from which it seem'd also otherwise to differ. i have indeed suspected that this may be a _sal armoniack_ properly enough so call'd, as compounded of the volatile salt of urine, and the fixt of the same liquor, which, as i noted, is not unlike sea-salt; but that it self argues a manifest difference betwixt the salts, since such a volatile salt is not wont to unite thus with an ordinary _alcali_, but to fly away from it in the heat. and on this occasion i remember that, to give some of my friends an ocular proof of the difference betwixt the fixt and volatile salt (of the same concrete) wood, i devis'd the following experiment. i took common venetian sublimate, and dissolv'd as much of it as i well could in fair water: then i took wood ashes, and pouring on them warme water, dissolv'd their salt; and filtrating the water, as soon as i found the _lixivium_ sufficiently sharp upon the tongue, i reserv'd it for use: then on part of the former solution of sublimate dropping a little of this dissolv'd fixt salt of wood, the liquors presently turn'd of an orange colour; but upon the other part of the clear solution of sublimate putting some of the volatile salt of wood (which abounds in the spirit of soot) the liquor immediately turn'd white, almost like milke, and after a while let fall a white sediment, as the other liquor did a yellow one. to all this that i have said concerning the difference of salts, i might add what i formerly told you, concerning the simple spirit of box, and such like woods, which differ much from the other salts hitherto mention'd, and yet would belong to the saline principle, if chymists did truly teach that all tasts proceed from it. and i might also annex, what i noted to you out of _helmont_[ ] concerning bodies, which, though they consist in great part of chymical oyles, do yet appear but volatile salts; but to insist on these things, were to repeat; and therefore i shall proceed. [footnote : _error vero per distillationem nobis monstrat etiam spiritum salinum plane volatilem odore nequicquam ut nec gustu distinguibilem a spiritu urinæ; in eo tamen essentialiter diversum, quod spiritus talis cruoris curat epilepsiam, non autem spiritus salis lotii._ helmont. aura vitalis.] [footnote : _aliquando oleum cinnamomi, &c. suo sali alcali miscetur absque omni aqua, trium mensium artificiosa occultaque circulatione, totum in salem volatilem commutatum est. helmont. tria prima chymicorum, &c. pag. ._] this disparity is also highly eminent in the separated sulphurs or chymical oyles of things. for they contain so much of the scent, and tast, and vertues, of the bodies whence they were drawn, that they seem to be but the material _crasis_ (if i may so speak) of their concretes. thus the oyles of cinnamon, cloves, nutmegs and other spices, seem to be but the united aromatick parts that did ennoble those bodies. and 'tis a known thing, that oyl of cinnamon, and oyle of cloves, (which i have likewise observ'd in the oyles of several woods) will sink to the bottom of water: whereas those of nutmegs and divers other vegetables will swim upon it. the oyle (abusively call'd spirit) of roses swims at the top of the water in the forme of a white butter, which i remember not to have observ'd in any other oyle drawn in any limbeck; yet there is a way (not here to be declar'd) by which i have seen it come over in the forme of other aromatick oyles, to the delight and wonder of those that beheld it. in oyle of anniseeds, which i drew both with, and without fermentation, i observ'd the whole body of the oyle in a coole place to thicken into the consistence and appearance of white butter, which with the least heat resum'd its former liquidness. in the oyl of olive drawn over in a retort, i have likewise more then once seen a spontaneous coagulation in the receiver: and i have of it by me thus congeal'd; which is of such a strangely penetrating scent, as if 'twould perforate the noses that approach it. the like pungent odour i also observ'd in the distill'd liquor of common sope, which forc'd over from _minium_, lately afforded an oyle of a most admirable penetrancy; and he must be a great stranger, both to the writings and preparations of chymists, that sees not in the oyles they distill from vegetables and animals, a considerable and obvious difference. nay i shall venture to add, _eleutherius_, (what perhaps you will think of kin to a paradox) that divers times out of the same animal or vegetable, there may be extracted oyles of natures obviously differing. to which purpose i shall not insist on the swimming and sinking oyles, which i have sometimes observ'd to float on, and subside under the spirit of _guajacum_, and that of divers other vegetables distill'd with a strong and lasting fire; nor shall i insist on the observation elsewhere mention'd, of the divers and unminglable oyles afforded us by humane blood long fermented and digested with spirit of wine, because these kind of oyles may seem chiefly to differ in consistence and weight, being all of them high colour'd and adust. but the experiment which i devis'd to make out this difference of the oyles of the same vegetable, _ad oculum_, (as they speak) was this that followes. i took a pound of annisseeds, and having grosly beaten them, caused them to be put into a very large glass retort almost filled with fair water; and placing this retort in a sand furnace, i caus'd a very gentle heat to be administer'd during the first day, and a great part of the second, till the water was for the most part drawn off, and had brought over with it at least most of the volatile and aromatick oyle of the seeds. and then encreasing the fire, and changing the receiver, i obtain'd besides an empyreumatical spirit, a quantity of adust oyle; whereof a little floated upon the spirit, and the rest was more heavy, and not easily separable from it. and whereas these oyles were very dark, and smell'd (as chymists speak) so strongly of the fire, that their odour did not betray from what vegetables they had been forc'd; the other _aromatick_ oyle was enrich'd with the genuine smell and tast of the concrete; and spontaneously coagulating it self into white butter did manifest self [errata: it self] to be the true oyle of annisseeds; which concrete i therefore chose to employ about this experiment, that the difference of these oyles might be more conspicuous then it would have been, had i instead of it destill'd another vegetable. i had almost forgot to take notice, that there is another sort of bodies, which though not obtain'd from concretes by distillation, many chymists are wont to call their sulphur; not only because such substances are, for the most part, high colour'd (whence they are also, and that more properly, called tinctures) as dissolv'd sulphurs are wont to be; but especially because they are, for the most part, abstracted and separated from the rest of the masse by spirit of wine: which liquor those men supposing to be sulphureous, they conclude, that what it works upon, and abstracts, must be a sulphur also. and upon this account they presume, that they can sequester the sulphur even of minerals and metalls; from which 'tis known that they cannot by fire alone separate it. to all this i shall answer; that if these sequestred substances where indeed the sulphurs of the bodies whence they are drawn, there would as well be a great disparity betwixt chymical sulphurs obtain'd by spirit of wine, as i have already shewn there is betwixt those obtain'd by distillation in the forme of oyles: which will be evident from hence, that not to urge that themselves ascribe distinct vertues to mineral tinctures, extolling the tincture of gold against such and such diseases; the tincture of antimony, or of its glass, against others; and the tincture of emerauld against others; 'tis plain, that in tinctures drawn from vegetables, if the superfluous spirit of wine be distill'd off, it leaves at the bottom that thicker substance which chymists use to call the extract of the vegetable. and that these extracts are endow'd with very differing qualities according to the nature of the particular bodies that afforded them (though i fear seldom with so much of the specifick vertues as is wont to be imagin'd) is freely confess'd both by physitians and chymists. but, _eleutherius_, (sayes _carneades_) we may here take notice that the chymists do as well in this case, as in many others, allow themselves a license to abuse words: for not again to argue from the differing properties of tinctures, that they are not exactly pure and elementary sulphurs; they would easily appear not to be so much as sulphur's, although we should allow chymical oyles to deserve that name. for however in some mineral tinctures the natural fixtness of the extracted body does not alwayes suffer it to be easily further resoluble into differing substances; yet in very many extracts drawn from vegetables, it may very easily be manifested that the spirit of wine has not sequestred the sulphureous ingredient from the saline and mercurial ones; but has dissolv'd (for i take it to be a solution) the finer parts of the concrete (without making any nice distinction of their being perfectly sulphureous or not) and united it self with them into a kind of magistery; which consequently must contain ingredients or parts of several sorts. for we see that the stones that are rich in vitriol, being often drench'd with rain-water, the liquor will then extract a fine and transparent substance coagulable into vitriol; and yet though this vitriol be readily dissoluble in water, it is not a true elementary salt, but, as you know, a body resoluble into very differing parts, whereof one (as i shall have occasion to tell you anon) is yet of a metalline, and consequently not of an elementary nature. you may consider also, that common sulphur is readily dissoluble in oyle of turpentine, though notwithstanding its name it abounds as well, if not as much, in salt as in true sulphur; witness the great quantity of saline liquor it affords being set to flame away under a glasse bell. nay i have, which perhaps you will think strange, with the same oyle of turpentine alone easily enough dissolv'd crude antimony finely powder'd into a blood-red balsam, wherewith perhaps considerable things may be perform'd in surgery. and if it were now requisite, i could tell you of some other bodies (such as perhaps you would not suspect) that i have been able to work upon with certain chymical oyles. but instead of digressing further i shall make this use of the example i have nam'd. that 'tis not unlikely, but that spirit of wine which by its pungent tast, and by some other qualities that argue it better (especially its reduciblenesse, according to _helmont_, into _alcali_, and water,) seems to be as well of a saline as of a sulphureous nature, may well be suppos'd capable of dissolving substances that are not meerly elementary sulphurs, though perhaps they may abound with parts that are of kin thereunto. for i find that spirit of wine will dissolve _gumm lacca_, _benzoine_, and the _resinous_ parts of _jallap_, and even of _guaiacum_; whence we may well suspect that it may from spices, herbs, and other lesse compacted vegetables, extract substances that are not perfect sulphurs but mixt bodies. and to put it past dispute, there is many a vulgar extract drawn with spirit of wine, which committed to distillation will afford such differing substances as will loudly proclaim it to have been a very compounded body. so that we may justly suspect, that even in mineral tinctures it will not alwaies follow, that because a red substance is drawn from the concrete by spirit of wine, that substance is its true and elementary sulphur. and though some of these extracts may perhaps be inflamable; yet besides that others are not, and besides that their being reduc'd to such minuteness of parts may much facilitate their taking fire; besides this, i say, we see that common sulphur, common oyle, gumm lac, and many unctuous and resinous bodies, will flame well enough, though they be of very compounded natures: nay travellers of unsuspected credit assure us, as a known thing, that in some northern countries where firr trees and pines abound, the poorer sort of inhabitants use long splinters of those resinous woods to burne instead of candles. and as for the rednesse wont to be met with in such solutions, i could easily shew, that 'tis not necessary it should proceed from the sulphur of the concrete, dissolv'd by the spirit of wine; if i had leasure to manifest how much chymists are wont to delude themselves and others by the ignorance of those other causes upon whose account spirit of wine and other _menstruums_ may acquire a red or some other high colour. but to returne to our chymical oyles, supposing that they were exactly pure; yet i hope they would be, as the best spirit of wine is, but the more inflamable and deflagrable. and therefore since an oyle can be by the fire alone immediately turn'd into flame, which is something of a very differing nature from it: i shall demand how this oyle can be a primogeneal and incorruptible body, as most chymists would have their principles; since it is further resoluble into flame, which whether or no it be a portion of the element of fire, as an _aristotelian_ would conclude, is certainly something of a very differing nature from a chymical oyle, since it burnes, and shines, and mounts swiftly upwards; none of which a chymical oyle does, whilst it continues such. and if it should be objected, that the dissipated parts of this flaming oyle may be caught and collected again into oyl or sulphur; i shall demand, what chymist appears to have ever done it; and without examining whether it may not hence be as well said that sulphur is but compacted fire, as that fire is but diffus'd sulphur, i shall leave you to consider whether it may not hence be argu'd, that neither fire nor sulphur are primitive and indestructible bodies; and i shall further observe that, at least it will hence appear that a portion of matter may without being compounded with new ingredients, by having the texture and motion of its small parts chang'd, be easily, by the means of the fire, endow'd with new qualities, more differing from them it had before, then are those which suffice to discriminate the chymists principles from one another. we are next to consider, whether in the anatomy of mixt bodies, that which chymists call the mercurial part of them be un-compounded, or no. but to tell you true, though chymists do unanimously affirm that their resolutions discover a principle, which they call mercury, yet i find them to give of it descriptions so differing, and so Ænigmaticall, that i, who am not asham'd to confess that i cannot understand what is not sence, must acknowledge to you that i know not what to make of them. _paracelsus_ himself, and therefore, as you will easily believe, many of his followers, does somewhere call that mercury which ascends upon the burning of wood, as the peripateticks are wont to take the same smoke for air; and so seems to define mercury by volatility, or (if i may coyne such a word) effumability. but since, in this example, both volatile salt and sulphur make part of the smoke, which does indeed consist also both of phlegmatick and terrene corpuscles, this notion is not to be admitted; and i find that the more sober chymists themselves disavow it. yet to shew you how little of clearness we are to expect in the accounts even of latter _spagyrists_, be pleas'd to take notice, that _beguinus_, even in his _tyrocinium chymicum_,[ ] written for the instruction of novices, when he comes to tell us what are meant by the _tria prima_, which for their being principles ought to be defin'd the more accurately and plainly, gives us this description of mercury; _mercurius_ (sayes he) _est liquor ille acidus, permeabilis, penetrabilis, æthereus, ac purissimus, a quo omnis nutricatio, sensus, motus, vires, colores, senectutisque præproperæ retardatio._ which words are not so much a definition of it, as an _encomium_: and yet _quercetanus_ in his description of the same principle adds to these, divers other _epithets_. but both of them, to skip very many other faults that may be found with their metaphoricall descriptions, speak incongruously to the chymists own principles. for if mercury be an acid liquor, either hermetical philosophy must err in ascribing all tasts to salt, or else mercury must not be a principle, but compounded of a saline ingredient and somewhat else. _libavius_, though he find great fault with the obscurity of what the chymists write concerning their mercurial principle, does yet but give us such a negative description of it, as _sennertus_, how favourable soever to the _tria prima_, is not satisfi'd with. and this _sennertus_ himself, though the learnedst champion for the hypostatical principles, does almost as frequently as justly complain of the unsatisfactoriness of what the chymists teach concerning their mercury; and yet he himself (but with his wonted modesty) substitutes instead of the description of _libavius_, another, which many readers, especially if they be not peripateticks, will not know what to make of. for scarce telling us any more, then that in all bodies that which is found besides salt and sulphur, and the elements, or, as they call them, phlegm and dead earth, is that spirit which in _aristotles_ language may be call'd [greek: ousian analogon [errata: ousia analogos] tô tôn astrôn stoichaiô [errata: astrôn stoicheiô]]. he sayes that which i confess is not at all satisfactory to me, who do not love to seem to acquiesce in any mans mystical doctrines, that i may be thought to understand them. [footnote : _chm. tyrocin. lib. . cap. ._] if (sayes _eleutherius_) i durst presume that the same thing would be thought clear by me, and those that are fond of such cloudy expressions as you justly tax the chymists for, i should venture to offer to consideration, whether or no, since the mercurial principle that arises from distillation is unanimously asserted to be distinct from the salt and sulphur of the same concrete, that may not be call'd the mercury of a body, which though it ascend in distillation, as do the phlegme and sulphur, is neither insipid like the former, nor inflamable like the latter. and therefore i would substitute to the too much abused name of mercury, the more clear and familiar appellation of spirit, which is also now very much made use of even by the chymists themselves, of our times, though they have not given us so distinct an explication, as were fit, of what may be call'd the spirit of a mixt body. i should not perhaps (sayes _carneades_) much quarrel with your notion of mercury. but as for the chymists, what they can mean, with congruity to their own principles, by the mercury of animals and vegetables, 'twill not be so easie to find out; for they ascribe tasts only to the saline principle, and consequently would be much put to it to shew what liquor it is, in the resolution of bodies, that not being insipid, for that they call phlegme, neither is inflamable as oyle or sulphur, nor has any tast; which according to them must proceed from a mixture, at least, of salt. and if we should take spirit in the sence of the word receiv'd among modern chymists and physitians, for any distill'd liquor that is neither phlegme nor oyle, the appellation would yet appear ambiguous enough. for, plainly, that which first ascends in the distillation of wine and fermented liquors, is generally as well by chymists as others reputed a spirit. and yet pure spirit of wine being wholly inflamable ought according to them to be reckon'd to the sulphureous, not the mercurial principle. and among the other liquors that go under the name of spirits, there are divers which seem to belong to the family of salts, such as are the spirits of nitre, vitriol, sea-salt and others, and even the spirit of harts-horn, being, as i have try'd, in great part, if not totally reducible into salt and phlegme, may be suspected to be but a volatile salt disguis'd by the phlegme mingl'd with it into the forme of a liquor. however if this be a spirit, it manifestly differs very much from that of vinager, the tast of the one being acid, and the other salt, and their mixture in case they be very pure, sometimes occasioning an effervescence like that of those liquors the chymists count most contrary to one another. and even among those liquors that seem to have a better title then those hitherto mention'd, to the name of spirits, there appears a sensible diversity; for spirit of oak, for instance, differs from that of tartar, and this from that of box, or of _guaiacum_. and in short, even these spirits as well as other distill'd liquors manifest a great disparity betwixt themselves, either in their actions on our senses, or in their other operations. and (continues _carneades_) besides this disparity that is to be met with among those liquors that the modernes call spirits, & take for similar bodies, what i have formerly told you concerning the spirit of box-wood may let you see that some of those liquors not only have qualities very differing from others, but may be further resolved into substances differing from one another. and since many moderne chymists and other naturalists are pleased to take the mercurial spirit of bodies for the same principle, under differing names, i must invite you to observe, with me, the great difference that is conspicuous betwixt all the vegetable and animal spirits i have mention'd and running mercury. i speak not of that which is commonly sold in shops that many of themselves will confesse to be a mixt body; but of that which is separated from metals, which by some chymists that seem more philosophers then the rest, and especially by the above mentioned _claveus_, is (for distinction sake) called _mercurius corporum_. now this metalline liquor being one of those three principles of which mineral bodies are by _spagyrists_ affirmed to be compos'd and to be resoluble into them, the many notorious differences betwixt them and the mercuries, as they call them, of vegetables and animals will allow me to inferr, either that minerals and the other two sorts of mixt bodies consist not of the same elements, or that those principles whereinto minerals are immediately resolved, which chymists with great ostentation shew us as the true principles, of them, are but secundary principles, or mixts of a peculiar sort, which must be themselves reduc'd to a very differing forme, to be of the same kind with vegetable and animal liquors. but this is not all; for although i formerly told you how little credit there is to be given to the chymical processes commonly to be met with, of extracting the mercuries of metals, yet i will now add, that supposing that the more judicious of them do not untruly affirme that they have really drawn true and running mercury from several metals (which i wish they had cleerly taught us how to do also,) yet it may be still doubted whether such extracted mercuries do not as well differ from common quicksilver, and from one another, as from the mercuries of vegetables and animalls. _claveus_,[ ] in his apology, speaking of some _experiments_ whereby metalline mercuries may be fixt into the nobler metals, adds, that he spake of the mercuries drawn from metals; because common quicksilver by reason of its excessive coldnesse and moisture is unfit for that particular kind of operation; for which though a few lines before he prescribes in general the mercuries of metalline bodies, yet he chiefly commends that drawn by art from silver. and elsewhere, in the same book, he tells us, that he himself tryed, that by bare coction the quicksilver of tin or pewter (_argentum vivum ex stanno prolicitum_) may by an efficient cause, as he speaks, be turn'd into pure gold. and the experienc'd _alexander van suchten_, somewhere tells us, that by a way he intimates may be made a mercury of copper, not of the silver colour of other mercuries, but green; to which i shall add, that an eminent person, whose name his travells and learned writings have made famous, lately assur'd me that he had more then once seen the mercury of lead (which whatever authors promise, you will find it very difficult to make, at least in any considerable quantity) fixt into perfect gold. and being by me demanded whether or no any other mercury would not as well have been changed by the same operations, he assured me of the negative. [footnote : _dixi autem de argento vivo a metallis prolicito, quod vulgare ob nimiam frigiditatem & humiditatem nimium concoctioni est contumax, nec ab auro solum alterato coerceri potest._ gast. clave. in apoll.] and since i am fallen upon the mention of the mercuries of metals, you will perhaps expect (_eleutherius_!) that i should say something of their two other principles; but must freely confess to you, that what disparity there may be between the salts and sulphurs of metals and other menerals [transcriber's note: minerals], i am not my self experienced enough in the separations and examens of them, to venture to determine: (for as for the salts of metals, i formerly represented it as a thing much to be question'd, whether they have any at all:) and for the processes of separation i find in authors, if they were (what many of them are not) successfully practicable, as i noted above, yet they are to be performed by the assistance of other bodies, so hardly, if upon any termes at all, separable from them, that it is very difficult to give the separated principles all their due, and no more. but the sulphur of antimony which is vehemently vomitive, and the strongly scented anodyne sulphur of vitriol inclines me to think that not only mineral sulphurs differ from vegetable ones, but also from one another, retaining much of the nature of their concretes. the salts of metals, and of some sort of minerals, you will easily guesse by [errata: (by] the doubts i formerly express'd, whether metals have any salt at all [errata: all)], that i have not been so happy as yet to see, perhaps not for want of curiosity. but if _paracelsus_ did alwaies write so consentaneously to himself that his opinion were _confidently_ to be collected from every place of his writings where he seems to expresse it, i might safely take upon me to tell you, that he both countenances in general what i have delivered in my fourth main consideration, and in particular warrants me to suspect that there may be a difference in metalline and mineral salts, as well as we find it in those of other bodies. for, _sulphur_ (sayes he)[ ] _aliud in auro, aliud in argento, aliud in ferro, aliud in plumbo, stanno, &c. sic aliud in saphiro, aliud in smaragdo, aliud in rubino, chrysolito, amethisto, magnete, &c. item aliud in lapidibus, silice, salibus, fontibus, &c. nec vero tot sulphura tantum, sed & totidem salia; sal aliud in metallis, aliud in gemmis, aliud in lapidibus, aliud in salibus, aliud in vitriolo, aliud in alumine: similis etiam mercurii est ratio. alius in metallis, alius in gemmis, &c. ita ut unicuique speciei suus peculiaris mercurius sit. et tamen res saltem tres sunt; una essentia est sulphur; una est sal; una est mercurius. addo quod & specialius adhuc singula dividantur; aurum enim non unum, sed multiplex, ut et non unum pyrum, pomum, sed idem multiplex; totidem etiam sulphura auri, salia auri, mercurii auri; idem competit etiam metallis & gemmis; ut quot saphyri præstantiores, lævioris, &c. tot etiam saphyrica sulphura, saphyrica salia, saphyrici mercurii, &c. idem verum etiam est de turconibus & gemmis aliis universis._ from which passage (_eleutherius_) i suppose you will think i might without rashness conclude, either that my opinion is favoured by that of _paracelsus_, or that _paracelsus_ his opinion was not alwaies the same. but because in divers other places of his writings he seems to talk at a differing rate of the three principles and the four elements, i shall content my self to inferr from the alledg'd passage, that if his doctrine be not consistent with that part of mine which it is brought to countenance, it is very difficult to know what his opinion concerning salt, sulphur and mercury, was; and that consequently we had reason about the beginning of our conferences, to decline taking upon us, either to examine or oppose it. [footnote : paracel. de mineral. tract. . pag. .] i know not whether i should on this occasion add, that those very bodies the chymists call phlegme and earth do yet recede from an elementary simplicity. that common earth and water frequently do so, notwithstanding the received contrary opinion, is not deny'd by the more wary of the moderne peripateticks themselves: and certainly, most earths are much lesse simple bodies then is commonly imagined even by chymists, who do not so consideratly to prescribe and employ earths promiscuously in those distillations that require the mixture of some _caput mortuum_, to hinder the flowing together of the matter, and to retain its grosser parts. for i have found some earths to yield by distillation a liquor very far from being inodorous or insipid; and 'tis a known observation, that most kinds of fat earth kept cover'd from the rain, and hindred from spending themselves in the production of vegetables, will in time become impregnated with salt-petre. but i must remember that the water and earths i ought here to speak of, are such as are separated from mixt bodies by the fire; and therefore to restrain my discourse to such, i shall tell you, that we see the phlegme of vitriol (for instance) is a very effectual remedie against burnes; and i know a very famous and experienc'd _physitian_, whose unsuspected secret (himself confess'd to me) it is, for the discussing of hard and obstinate tumours. the phlegme of vinager, though drawn exceeding leasurly in a digesting furnace, i have purposely made tryall of; and sometimes found it able to draw, though slowly, a saccharine sweetness out of lead; and as i remember by long digestion, i dissolv'd corpals [errata: corals] in it. the phlegme of the sugar of saturne is said to have very peculiar properties. divers eminent chymists teach, that it will dissolve pearls, which being precipitated by the spirit of the same concrete are thereby (as they say) rendred volatile; which has been confirmed to me, upon his own observation, by a person of great veracity. the phlegme of wine, and indeed divers other liquors that are indiscriminately condemnd to be cast away as phlegm, are endow'd with qualities that make them differ both from meer water, and from each other; and whereas the chymists are pleas'd to call the _caput mortuum_ of what they have distill'd (after they have by affusion of water drawn away its salt) _terra damnata_, or earth, it may be doubted whether or no those earths are all of them perfectly alike: and it is scarce to be doubted, but that there are some of them which remain yet unreduc'd to an elementary nature. the ashes of wood depriv'd of all the salt, and bone-ashes, or calcin'd harts-horn, which refiners choose to make tests of, as freest from salt, seem unlike: and he that shall compare either of these insipid ashes to lime, and much more to the _calx_ of talk [transcriber's note: talck] (though by the affusion of water they be exquisitely dulcify'd) will perhaps see cause to think them things of a somewhat differing nature. and it is evident in colcothar that the exactest calcination, follow'd by an exquisite dulcification, does not alwaies reduce the remaining body into elementary earth; for after the salt or vitriol (if the calcination have been too faint) is drawn out of the colcothar, the residue is not earth, but a mixt body, rich in medical vertues (as experience has inform'd me) and which _angelus sala_ affirmes to be partly reducible into malleable copper; which i judge very probable: for though when i was making experiments upon colcothar, i was destitute of a furnace capable of giving a heat intense enough to bring such a calx to fusion; yet having conjectur'd that if colcothar abounded with that metal, aqua fortis would find it out there, i put some dulcifi'd colcothar into that _menstruum_, and found the liquor, according to my expectation, presently colour'd as highly as if it had been an ordinary solution of copper. the sceptical chymist. _the fifth part._ here _carneades_ making a pause, i must not deny (sayes his friend to him) that i think you have sufficiently prov'd that these distinct substances which chymists are wont to obtain from mixt bodies, by their vulgar destillation, are not pure and simple enough to deserve, in rigour of speaking, the name of elements, or principles. but i suppose you have heard, that there are some modern _spagyrists_, who give out that they can by further and more skilfull purifications, so reduce the separated ingredients of mixt bodies to an elementary simplicity, that the oyles (for instance) extracted from all mixts shall as perfectly resemble one another, as the drops of water do. if you remember (replies _carneades_) that at the beginning of our conference with _philoponus_, i declar'd to him before the rest of the company, that i would not _engage_ my self at present to do any more then examine the usual proofs alledg'd by chymists, for the vulgar doctrine of their three hypostatical principles; you will easily perceive that i am not oblig'd to make answer to what you newly propos'd; and that it rather grants, then disproves what i have been contending for: since by pretending to make so great a change in the reputed principles that destillation affords the common _spagyrists_, 'tis plainly enough presuppos'd, that before such artificial depurations be made, the substances to be made more simple were not yet simple enough to be look'd upon as elementary; wherefore in case the _artists_ you speak of could perform what they give out they can, yet i should not need to be asham'd of having question'd the vulgar opinion touching the _tria prima_. and as to the thing it self, i shall freely acknowledge to you, that i love not to be forward in determining things to be impossible, till i know and have consider'd the means by which they are propos'd to be effected. and therefore i shall not peremptorily deny either the possibility of what these _artists_ promise, or my assent to any just inference; however destructive to my conjectures, that may be drawn from their performances. but give me leave to tell you withall, that because such promises are wont (as experience has more then once inform'd me) to be much more easily made, then made good by chymists, i must withhold my beliefe from their assertions, till their experiments exact it; and must not be so easie as to expect before hand, an unlikely thing upon no stronger inducements then are yet given me: besides that i have not yet found by what i have heard of these artists, that though they pretend to bring the several substances into which the fire has divided the concrete, to an exquisite simplicity, they pretend also to be able by the fire to divide all concretes, minerals, and others, into the same number of distinct substances. and in the mean time i must think it improbable, that they can either truly separate as many differing bodies from gold (for instance) or _osteocolla_, as we can do from wine, or vitriol; or that the mercury (for example) of gold or saturn would be perfectly of the same nature with that of harts-horn; and that the sulphur of antimony would be but numerically different from the distill'd butter or oyle of roses. but suppose (sayes _eleutherius_) that you should meet with chymists, who would allow you to take in earth and water into the number of the principles of mixt bodies; and being also content to change the ambiguous name of mercury for that more intelligible one of spirit, should consequently make the principles of compound bodies to be five; would you not think it something hard to reject so plausible an opinion, only because the five substances into which the fire divides mixt bodies are not exactly pure, and homogeneous? for my part (continues _carneades_) i cannot but think it somewhat strange, in case this opinion be not true, that it should fall out so luckily, that so great a variety of bodies should be analyz'd by the fire into just five distinct substances; which so little differing from the bodies that bear those names, may so plausibly be call'd oyle, spirit, salt, water, and earth. the opinion you now propose (answers _carneades_) being another then that i was engag'd to examine, it is not requisite for me to debate it at present; nor should i have leisure to do it thorowly. wherefore i shall only tell you in general, that though i think this opinion in some respects more defensible then that of the vulgar chymists; yet you may easily enough learn from the past discourse what may be thought of it: since many of the objections made against the vulgar doctrine of the chymists seem, without much alteration, employable against this _hypothesis_ also. for, besides that this doctrine does as well as the other take it for granted, (what is not easie to be prov'd) that the fire is the true and adequate analyzer of bodies, and that all the distinct substances obtainable from a mixt body by the fire, were so pre-existent in it, that they were but extricated from each other by the _analysis_; besides that this opinion, too, ascribe [errata: ascribes] to the productions of the fire an elementary simplicity, which i have shewn not to belong to them; and besides that this doctrine is lyable to some of the other difficulties, wherewith that of the _tria prima_ is incumber'd; besides all this, i say, this quinary number of elements, (if you pardon the expression) ought at least to have been restrain'd to the generality of animal and vegetable bodies, since not only among these there are some bodies (as i formerly argu'd) which, for ought has yet been made to appear, do consist, either of fewer or more similar substances then precisely five. but in the mineral kingdom, there is scarce one concrete that has been evinc'd to be adequatly divisible into such five principles or elements, and neither more nor less, as this opinion would have every mixt body to consist of. and this very thing (continues _carneades_) may serve to take away or lessen your wonder, that just so many bodies as five should be found upon the resolution of concretes. for since we find not that the fire can make any such _analysis_ (into five elements) of metals and other mineral bodies, whose texture is more strong and permanent, it remains that the five substances under consideration be obtain'd from vegetable and animal bodies, which (probably by reason of their looser contexture) are capable of being distill'd. and as to such bodies, 'tis natural enough, that, whether we suppose that there are, or are not, precisely five elements, there should ordinarily occurr in the dissipated parts a five fold diversity of scheme (if i may so speak.) for if the parts do not remain all fix'd, as in gold, calcin'd talck, &c. nor all ascend, as in the sublimation of brimstone, camphire, &c. but after their dissipation do associate themselves into new schemes of matter; it is very likely, that they will by the fire be divided into fix'd and volatile (i mean, in reference to that degree of heat by which they are destill'd) and those volatile parts will, for the most part, ascend either in a dry forme, which chymists are pleas'd to call, if they be tastless, flowers; if sapid, volatile salt; or in a liquid forme. and this liquor must be either inflamable, and so pass for oyl, or not inflamable, and yet subtile and pungent, which may be call'd spirit; or else strengthless or insipid, which may be nam'd phlegme, or water. and as for the fixt part, or _caput mortuum_, it will most commonly consist of corpuscles, partly soluble in water, or sapid, (especially if the saline parts were not so volatile, as to fly away before) which make up its fixt salt; and partly insoluble and insipid, which therefore seems to challenge the name of earth. but although upon this ground one might easily enough have foretold, that the differing substances obtain'd from a perfectly mixt body by the fire would for the most part be reducible to the five newly mentioned states of matter; yet it will not presently follow, that these five distinct substances were simple and primogeneal bodies, so pre-existent in the concrete that the fire does but take them asunder. besides that it does not appear, that all mixt bodies, (witness, gold, silver, mercury, &c.) nay nor perhaps all vegetables, which may appear by what we said above of _camphire_, _benzoin_, &c. are resoluble by fire into just such differing schemes of matter. nor will the experiments formerly alledg'd permit us to look upon these separated substances as elementary, or uncompounded. neither will it be a sufficient argument of their being bodies that deserve the names which chymists are pleas'd to give them, that they have an analogy in point of consistence, or either volatility or fixtness, or else some other obvious quality, with the suppos'd principles, whose names are ascrib'd to them. for, as i told you above, notwithstanding this resemblance in some one quality, there may be such a disparity in others, as may be more fit to give them differing appellations, then the resemblance is to give them one and the same. and indeed it seems but somewhat a gross way of judging of the nature of bodies, to conclude without scruple, that those must be of the same nature that agree in some such general quality, as fluidity, dryness, volatility, and the like: since each of those qualities, or states of matter, may comprehend a great variety of bodies, otherwise of a very differing nature; as we may see in the calxes of gold, of vitriol, and of venetian talck, compar'd with common ashes, which yet are very dry, and fix'd by the vehemence of the fire, as well as they. and as we may likewise gather from what i have formerly observ'd, touching the spirit of box-wood, which though a volatile, sapid, and not inflamable liquor, as well as the spirits of harts-horn, of blood and others, (and therefore has been hitherto call'd, the spirit, and esteem'd for one of the principles of the wood that affords it;) may yet, as i told you, be subdivided into two liquors, differing from one another, and one of them at least, from the generality of other chymical spirits. but you may your self, if you please, (pursues _carneades_) accommodate to the _hypothesis_ you propos'd what other particulars you shall think applicable to it, in the foregoing discourse. for i think it unseasonable for me to meddle now any further with a controversie, which since it does not now belong to me, leaves me at liberty to take my own time to declare my self about it. _eleutherius_ perceiving that _carneades_ was somewhat unwilling to spend any more time upon the debate of this opinion, and having perhaps some thoughts of taking hence a rise to make him discourse it more fully another time, thought not fit as then to make any further mention to him of the propos'd opinion, but told him; i presume i need not mind you, _carneades_, that both the patrons of the ternary number of principles, and those that would have five elements, endeavour to back their experiments with a specious reason or two; and especially some of those embracers of the opinion last nam'd (whom i have convers'd with, and found them learned men) assigne this reason of the necessity of five distinct elements; that otherwise mixt bodies could not be so compounded and temper'd as to obtain a due consistence and competent duration. for salt (say they) is the _basis_ of solidity; and permanency in compound bodies, without which the other four elements might indeed be variously and loosly blended together, but would remain incompacted; but that salt might be dissolv'd into minute parts, and convey'd to the other substances to be compacted by it, and with it, there is a necessity of water. and that the mixture may not be too hard and brittle, a sulphureous or oyly principle must intervene to make the mass more tenacious; to this a mercurial spirit must be superadded; which by its activity may for a while premeate [transcriber's note: permeate], and as it were leaven the whole mass, and thereby promote the more exquisite mixture and incorporation of the ingredients. to all which (lastly) a portion of earth must be added, which by its drinesse and poracity [errata: porosity] may soak up part of that water wherein the salt was dissolv'd, and eminently concurr with the other ingredients to give the whole body the requisite consistence. i perceive (sayes _carneades_ smiling) that if it be true, as 'twas lately rooted [errata: noted] from the proverb, _that good wits have bad memories_, you have that title, as well as a better, to a place among the good wits. for you have already more then once forgot, that i declar'd to you that i would at this conference examine only the experiments of my adversaries, not their speculative reasons. yet 'tis not (subjoynes _carneades_) for fear of medling with the argument you have propos'd, that i decline the examining it at present. for if when we are more at leasure, you shall have a mind that we may solemnly consider of it together; i am confident we shall scarce find it insoluble. and in the mean time we may observe, that such a way of arguing may, it seems, be speciously accommodated to differing _hypotheses_. for i find that _beguinus_, and other assertors of the _tria prima_, pretend to make out by such a way, the requisiteness of their salt, sulphur and mercury, to constitute mixt bodies, without taking notice of any necessity of an addition of water and earth. and indeed neither sort of chymists seem to have duly consider'd how great variety there is in the textures and consistences of compound bodie; sand [errata: bodies; and] how little the consistence and duration of many of them seem to accommodate and be explicable by the propos'd notion. and not to mention those almost incorruptible substances obtainable by the fire, which i have prov'd to be somewhat compounded, and which the chymists will readily grant not to be perfectly mixt bodies: (not to mention these, i say) if you will but recall to mind some of those experiments, whereby i shew'd you that out of common water only mixt bodies (and even living ones) of very differing consistences, and resoluble by fire into as many principles as other bodies acknowledg'd to be perfectly mixt; if you do this, i say, you will not, i suppose, be averse from beleeving, that nature by a convenient disposition of the minute parts of a portion of matter may contrive bodies durable enough, and of this, or that, or the other consistence, without being oblig'd to make use of all, much less of any determinate quantity of each of the five elements, or of the three principles to compound such bodies of. and i have (pursues _carneades_) something wonder'd, chymists should not consider, that there is scarce any body in nature so permanent and indissoluble as glass; which yet themselves teach us may be made of bare ashes, brought to fusion by the meer violence of the fire; so that, since ashes are granted to consist but of pure salt and simple earth, sequestred from all the other principles or elements, they must acknowledge, that even art it self can of two elements only, or, if you please, one principle and one element, compound a body more durable then almost any in the world. which being undeniable, how will they prove that nature cannot compound mixt bodies, and even durable ones, under all the five elements or material principles. but to insist any longer on this occasional disquisition, touching their opinion that would establish five elements, were to remember as little as you did before, that the debate of this matter is no part of my first undertaking; and consequently, that i have already spent time enough in what i look back upon but as a digression, or at best an excursion. and thus, _eleutherius_, (sayes _carneades_) having at length gone through the four considerations i propos'd to discourse unto you, i hold it not unfit, for fear my having insisted so long on each of them may have made you forget their _series_, briefly to repeat them by telling you, that since, in the first place, it may justly be doubted whether or no the fire be, as chymists suppose it, the genuine and universal resolver of mixt bodies; since we may doubt, in the next place, whether or no all the distinct substances that may be obtain'd from a mixt body by the fire were pre-existent there in the formes in which they were separated from it; since also, though we should grant the substances separable from mixt bodies by the fire to have been their component ingredients, yet the number of such substances does not appear the same in all mixt bodies; some of them being resoluble into more differing substances than three, and others not being resoluble into so many as three. and since, lastly, those very substances that are thus separated are not for the most part pure and elementary bodies, but new kinds of mixts; since, i say, these things are so, i hope you will allow me to inferr, that the vulgar experiments (i might perchance have added, the arguments too) wont to be alledg'd by chymists to prove, that their three hypostatical principles do adequately compose all mixt bodies, are not so demonstrative as to reduce a wary person to acquiesce in their doctrine, which, till they explain and prove it better, will by its perplexing darkness be more apt to puzzle then satisfy considering men, and will to them appear incumbred with no small difficulties. and from what has been hitherto deduc'd (continues _carneades_) we may learn, what to judge of the common practice of those chymists, who because they have found that diverse compound bodies (for it will not hold in all) can be resolv'd into, or rather can be brought to afford two or three differing substances more then the soot and ashes, whereinto the naked fire commonly divides them in our chymnies, cry up their own sect for the invention of a new philosophy, some of them, as _helmont, &c._ styling themselves philosophers by the fire; and the most part not only ascribing, but as far as in them lies, engrossing to those of their sect the title of philosophers. but alas, how narrow is this philosophy, that reaches but to some of those compound bodies, which we find but upon, or in the crust or outside of our terrestrial globe, which is it self but a point in comparison of the vast extended universe, of whose other and greater parts the doctrine of the _tria prima_ does not give us an account! for what does it teach us, either of the nature of the sun, which astronomers affirme to be eight-score and odd times bigger then the whole earth? or of that of those numerous fixt starrs, which, for ought we know, would very few, if any of them, appear inferiour in bulke and brightness to the sun, if they were as neer us as he? what does the knowing that salt, sulphur and mercury, are the principles of mixt bodies, informe us of the nature of that vast, fluid, and Ætherial substance, that seemes to make up the interstellar, and consequently much the greatest part of the world? for as for the opinion commonly ascrib'd to _paracelsus_, as if he would have not only the four peripatetick elements, but even the celestial parts of the universe to consist of his three principles, since the modern chymists themselves have not thought so groundless a conceit worth their owning, i shall not think it worth my confuting. but i should perchance forgive the hypothesis i have been all this while examining, if, though it reaches but to a very little part of the world, it did at least give us a satisfactory account of those things to which 'tis said to reach. but i find not, that it gives us any other then a very imperfect information even about mixt bodies themselves: for how will the knowledge of the _tria prima_ discover to us the reason, why the loadstone drawes a needle and disposes it to respect the poles, and yet seldom precisely points at them? how will this hypothesis teach us how a chick is formed in the egge, or how the seminal principles of mint, pompions, and other vegitables, that i mention'd to you above, can fashion water into various plants, each of them endow'd with its peculiar and determinate shape, and with divers specifick and discriminating qualities? how does this hypothesis shew us, how much salt, how much sulphur, and how much mercury must be taken to make a chick or a pompion? and if we know that, what principle is it, that manages these ingredients, and contrives (for instance) such liquors as the white and yelk of an egge into such a variety of textures as is requisite to fashion the bones, veines, arteries, nerves, tendons, feathers, blood, and other parts of a chick; and not only to fashion each limbe, but to connect them altogether, after that manner that is most congruous to the perfection of the animal which is to consist of them? for to say, that some more fine and subtile part of either or all the hypostatical principles is the director in all this business, and the architect of all this elaborate structure, is to give one occasion to demand again, what proportion and way of mixture of the _tria prima_ afforded this _architectonick_ spirit, and what agent made so skilful and happy a mixture? and the answer to this question, if the chymists will keep themselves within their three principles, will be lyable to the same inconvenience, that the answer to the former was. and if it were not to intrench upon the theame of a friend of ours here present, i could easily prosecute the imperfections of the vulgar chymists philosophy, and shew you, that by going about to explicate by their three principles, i say not, all the abstruse properties of mixt bodies, but even such obvious and more familiar _phænomena_ as _fluidity_ and _firmness_, the colours and figures of stones, minerals, and other compound bodies, the nutrition of either plants or animals, the gravity of gold or quicksilver compar'd with wine or spirit of wine; by attempting, i say, to render a reason of these (to omit a thousand others as difficult to account for) from any proportion of the three simple ingredients, chymists will be much more likely to discredit themselves and their _hypothesis_, then satisfy an intelligent inquirer after truth. but (interposes _eleutherus_) [transcriber's note: eleutherius] this objection seems no more then may be made against the four peripatetick elements. and indeed almost against any other _hypothesis_, that pretends by any determinate number of material ingredients to render a reason of the _phænomena_ of nature. and as for the use of the chymical doctrine of the three principles, i suppose you need not be told by me, that the great champion of it, the learned _sennertus_,[ ] assignes this noble use of the _tria prima_, that from them, as the neerest and most proper principles, may be deduc'd and demonstrated the properties which are in mixt bodies, and which cannot be proximately (as they speak) deduc'd from the elements. and this, sayes he, is chiefly apparent, when we inquire into the properties and faculties of medecines. and i know (continues _eleutherius_) that the person you have assum'd, of an opponent of the _hermetick doctrine_, will not so far prevaile against your native and wonted equity, as to keep you from acknowledging that philosophy is much beholden to the notions and discoveries of chymists. [footnote : _senn. de cons. & dissen. p. ._] if the chymists you speak of (replyes _carneades_) had been so modest, or so discreet, as to propose their opinion of the _tria prima_, but as a notion useful among others, to increase humane knowledge, they had deserv'd more of our thanks; and less of our opposition; but since the thing that they pretend is not so much to contribute a notion toward the improvement of philosophy, as to make this notion attended [errata: (attended] by a few lesse considerable ones) pass for a new philosophy itself. nay, since they boast so much of this phancie of theirs, that the famous _quercetanus_ scruples not to write, that if his most certain doctrine of the three principles were sufficiently learned, examin'd, and cultivated, it would easily dispel all the darkness that benights our minds, and bring in a clear light, that would remove all difficulties. this school affording theorems and axiomes irrefragable, and to be admitted without dispute by impartial judges; and so useful withal, as to exempt us from the necessity of having recourse, for want of the knowledg of causes, to that sanctuary of the igorant [transcriber's note: ignorant], occult qualities; since, i say, this domestick notion of the chymists is so much overvalued by them, i cannot think it unfit, they should be made sensible of their mistake; and be admonish'd to take in more fruitful and comprehensive principles, if they mean to give us an account of the _phænomena_ of nature; and not confine themselves and (as far as they can) others to such narrow principles, as i fear will scarce inable them to give an account (i mean an intelligible one) of the tenth part (i say not) of all the _phænomena_ of nature; but even of all such as by the _leucippian_ or some of the other sorts of principles may be plausibly enough explicated. and though i be not unwilling to grant, that the incompetency i impute to the chymical _hypothesis_ is but the same which may be objected against that of the four elements, and divers other doctrines that have been maintain'd by learned men; yet since 'tis the chymical _hypothesis_ only which i am now examining, i see not why, if what i impute to it be a real inconvenience, either it should cease to be so, or i should scruple to object it, because either theories are lyable thereunto, as well as the hermetical. for i know not why a truth should be thought lesse a truth for the being fit to overthrow variety of errors. i am oblig'd to you (continues _carneades_, a little smiling) for the favourable opinion you are pleas'd to express of my equity, if there be no design in it. but i need not be tempted by an artifice, or invited by a complement, to acknowledge the great service that the labours of chymists have done the lovers of useful learning; nor even on this occasion shall their arrogance hinder my gratitude. but since we are as well examining to [errata: delete "to"] the truth of their doctrine as the merit of their industry, i must in order to the investigation of the first, continue a reply, to talk at the rate of the part i have assum'd; and tell you, that when i acknowledg the usefulness of the labours of _spagyrists_ to natural philosophy, i do it upon the score of their experiments, not upon that of their speculations; for it seems to me, that their writings, as their furnaces, afford as well smoke as light; and do little lesse obscure some subjects, then they illustrate others. and though i am unwilling to deny, that 'tis difficult for a man to be an accomplisht naturalist, that is a stranger to chymistry, yet i look upon the common operations and practices of chymists, almost as i do on the letters of the alphabet, without whose knowledge 'tis very hard for a man to become a philosopher; and yet that knowledge is very far from being sufficient to make him one. but (sayes _carneades_, resuming a more serious look) to consider a little more particularly what you alledg in favour of the chymical doctrine of the _tria prima_, though i shall readily acknowledge it not to be unuseful, and that the divisers [errata: devisers] and embracers of it have done the common-wealth of learning some service, by helping to destroy that excessive esteem, or rather veneration, wherewith the doctrine of the four elements was almost as generally as undeservedly entertain'd; yet what has been alledg'd concerning the usefulness of the _tria prima_, seems to me liable to no contemptible difficulties. and first, as for the very way of probation, which the more learned and more sober champions of the chymical cause employ to evince the chymical principles in mixt bodies, it seems to me to be farr enough from being convincing. this grand and leading argument, your _sennertus_ himself, who layes great weight upon it, and tells us, that the most learned philosophers employ this way of reasoning to prove the most important things, proposes thus: _ubicunque_ (sayes he) _pluribus eædem affectiones & qualitates insunt, per commune quoddam principium insint necesse est, sicut omnia sunt gravia propter terram, calida propter ignem. at colores, odores, sapores, esse_ [greek: phlogiston] _& similia alia, mineralibus, metallis, gemmis, lapidibus, plantis, animalibus insunt. ergo per commune aliquod principium, & subiectum, insunt. at tale principium non sunt elementa. nullam enim habent ad tales qualitates producendas potentiam. ergo alia principia, unde fluant, inquirenda sunt._ in the recital of this argument, (sayes _carneades_) i therefore thought fit to retain the language wherein the author proposes it, that i might also retain the propriety of some latine termes, to which i do not readily remember any that fully answer in english. but as for the argumentation it self, 'tis built upon a precarious supposition, that seems to me neither demonstrable nor true; for, how does it appear, that where the same quality is to be met with in many bodies, it must belong to them upon the account of some one body whereof they all partake? (for that the major of our authors argument is to be understood of the material ingredients of bodies, appears by the instances of earth and fire he annexes to explain it.) for to begin with that very example which he is pleas'd to alledge for himself; how can he prove, that the gravity of all bodies proceeds from what they participate of the element of earth? since we see, that not only common water, but the more pure distill'd rain water is heavy; and quicksilver is much heavier than earth it self; though none of my adversaries has yet prov'd, that it contains any of that element. and i the rather make use of this example of quicksilver, because i see not how the assertors of the elements will give any better account of it then the chymists. for if it be demanded how it comes to be fluid, they will answer, that it participates much of the nature of water. and indeed, according to them, water may be the predominant element in it, since we see, that several bodies which by distillation afford liquors that weigh more then their _caput mortuum_ do not yet consist of liquor enough to be fluid. yet if it be demanded how quicksilver comes to be so heavy, then 'tis reply'd, that 'tis by reason of the earth that abounds in it; but since, according to them, it must consist also of air, and partly of fire, which they affirm to be light elements, how comes it that it should be so much heavier then earth of the same bulk, though to fill up the porosities and other cavities it be made up into a mass or paste with water, which it self they allow to be a heavy element. but to returne to our _spagyrists_, we see that chymical oyles and fixt salts, though never so exquisitely purify'd and freed from terrestrial parts, do yet remain ponderous enough. and experience has inform'd me, that a pound, for instance, of some of the heaviest woods, as _guajacum_ that will sink in water, being burnt to ashes will yield a much less weight of them (whereof i found but a small part to be alcalyzate) then much lighter vegetables: as also that the black charcoal of it will not sink as did the wood, but swim; which argues that the differing gravity of bodies proceeds chiefly from their particular texture, as is manifest in gold, the closest and compactest of bodies, which is many times heavier then we can possibly make any parcell of earth of the same bulk. i will not examine, what may be argu'd touching the gravity or quality analagous thereunto, of even celestial bodies, from the motion of the spots about the sun, d [errata: and] from the appearing equality of the suppos'd seas in the moon; nor consider how little those _phæmonea_ [transcriber's note: phænomena] would agree with what _sennertus_ presumes concerning gravity. but further to invalidate his supposition, i shall demand, upon what chymical principle fluidity depends? and yet fluidity is, two or three perhaps excepted, the most diffused quality of the universe, and far more general then almost any other of those that are to be met with in any of the chymicall principles, or _aristotelian_ elements; since not only the air, but that vast expansion we call heaven, in comparison of which our terrestrial globe (supposing it were all solid) is but a point; and perhaps to [errata: too] the sun and the fixt stars are fluid bodies. i demand also, from which of the chymical principles motion flowes; which yet is an affection of matter much more general then any that can be deduc'd from any of the three chymical principles. i might ask the like question concerning light, which is not only to be found in the kindl'd sulphur of mixt bodis [transcriber's note: bodies], but (not to mention those sorts of rotten woods, and rotten fish that shine in the dark) in the tails of living glow-wormes, and in the vast bodies of the sun and stars. i would gladly also know, in which of the three principles the quality, we call sound, resides as in its proper subject; since either oyl falling upon oyle, or spirit upon spirit, or salt upon salt, in a great quantity, and from a considerable height, will make a noise, or if you please, create a sound, and (that the objection may reach the _aristotelians_) so will also water upon water, and earth upon earth. and i could name other qualities to be met within divers bodies, of which i suppose my adversaries will not in haste assign any subject, upon whose account it must needs be, that the quality belongs to all the other several bodies. and, before i proceed any further, i must here invite you to compare the supposition we are examining, with some other of the chymical tenents. for, first they do in effect teach that more then one quality may belong to, and be deduc'd from, one principle. for, they ascribe to salt tasts, and the power of coagulation; to sulphur, as well odours as inflamableness; and some of them ascribe to mercury, colours; as all of them do effumability, as they speak. and on the other side, it is evident that volatility belongs in common to all the three principles, and to water too. for 'tis manifest, that chymical oyles are volatile; that also divers salts emerging, upon the analysis of many concretes, are very volatile, is plain from the figitiveness [errata: fugitivenesse] of salt, of harts-horne, flesh, &c. ascending in the distillation of those bodies. how easily water may be made to ascend in vapours, there is scarce any body that has not observ'd. and as for what they call the mercuriall principle of bodies, that is so apt to be rais'd in the form of steam, that _paracelsus_ and others define it by that aptness to fly up; so that (to draw that inference by the way) it seems not that chymists have been accurate in their doctrine of qualities, and their respective principles, since they both derive several qualities from the same principle, and must ascribe the same quality to almost all their principles and other bodies besides. and thus much for the first thing taken for granted, without sufficient proof, by your _sennertus_: and to add that upon the bye (continues _carneades_) we may hence learn what to judge of the way of argumentation, which that fierce champion of the _aristotelians_ against the chymists, _anthonius guntherus billichius_[ ] employes, where he pretends to prove against _beguinus_, that not only the four elements do immediately concur to constitute every mixt body, and are both present in it, and obtainable from it upon its dissolution; but that in the _tria prima_ themselves, whereinto chymists are wont to resolve mixt bodies, each of them clearly discovers it self to consist of four elements. the ratiocination it self (pursues _carneades_) being somewhat unusual, i did the other day transcribe it, and (sayes he, pulling a paper out of his pocket) it is this. _ordiamur, cum beguino, a ligno viridi, quod si concremetur, videbis in sudore aquam, in fumo aerem, in flamma & prunis ignem, terram in cineribus: quod si beguino placuerit ex eo colligere humidum aquosum, cohibere humidum oleaginosum, extrahere ex cineribus salem; ego ipsi in unoquoque horum seorsim quatuor elementa ad oculum demonstrabo, eodem artificio quo in ligno viridi ea demonstravi. humorem aquosum admovebo igni. ipse aquam ebullire videbit, in vapore aerem conspiciet, ignem sentiet in æstu, plus minus terræ in sedimento apparebit. humor porro oleaginosus aquam humiditate & fluiditate per se, accensus vero ignem flamma prodit, fumo aerem, fuligine, nidore & amurca terram. salem denique ipse beguinus siccum vocat & terrestrem, qui tamen nec fusus aquam, nec caustica vi ignem celare potest; ignis vero violentia in halitus versus nec ab aere se alienum esse demonstrat; idem de lacte, de ovis, de semine lini, de garyophyllis, de nitro, de sale marino, denique de antimonio, quod fuit de ligno viridi judicium; eadem de illorum partibus, quas_ beguinus _adducit, sententia, quæ de viridis ligni humore aquoso, quæ de liquore ejusdem oleoso, quæ de sale fuit._ [footnote : _in thessalo redivivo. cap. . pag. . & ._] this bold discourse (resumes _carneades_, putting up again his paper,) i think it were not very difficult to confute, if his arguments were as considerable as our time will probably prove short for the remaining and more necessary part of my discourse; wherefore referring you for an answer to what was said concerning the dissipated parts of a burnt piece of green wood, to what i told _themistius_ on the like occasion, i might easily shew you, how sleightly and superficially our _guntherus_ talks of the dividing the flame of green wood into his four elements; _when_ he makes that vapour to be air, which being caught in glasses and condens'd, presently discovers it self to have been but an aggregate of innumerable very minute drops of liquor; and _when_ he would prove the phlegmes being compos'd of fire by that heat which is adventitious to the liquor, and ceases upon the absence of what produc'd it (whether that be an agitation proceeding from the motion of the external fire, or the presence of a multitude of igneous atomes pervading the pores of the vessel, and nimbly permeating the whole body of the water) i might, i say, urge these and divers other weaknesses of his discourse. but i will rather take notice of what is more pertinent to the occasion of this digression, namely, that taking it for granted, that fluidity (with which he unwarily seems to confound humidity) must proceed from the element of water, he makes a chymical oyle to consist of that elementary liquor; and yet in the very next words proves, that it consists also of fire, by its inflamability; not remembring that exquisitely pure spirit of wine is both more fluid then water it self, and yet will flame all away without leaving the least aqueous moisture behind it; and without such an _amurca_ and soot as he would deduce the presence of earth from. so that the same liquor may according to his doctrine be concluded by its great fluidity to be almost all water; and by its burning all away to be all disguised fire. and by the like way of probation our author would shew that the fixt salt of wood is compounded of the four elements. for (sayes he) being turn'd by the violence of the fire into steames, it shews it self to be of kin to air; whereas i doubt whether he ever saw a true fixt salt (which to become so, must have already endur'd the violence of an incinerating fire) brought by the fire alone to ascend in the forme of exhalations; but i do not doubt that if he did, and had caught those exhalations in convenient vessels, he would have found them as well as the steames of common salt, &c. of a saline and not an aereal nature. and whereas our authour takes it also for granted, that the fusibility of salt must be deduc'd from water, it is indeed so much the effect of heat variously agitating the minute parts of a body, without regard to water, that gold (which by its being the heavyest and fixtest of bodies, should be the most earthy) will be brought to fusion by a strong fire; which sure is more likely to drive away then increase its aqueous ingredient, if it have any; and on the other side, for want of a sufficient agitation of its minute parts, ice is not fluid, but solid; though he presumes also that the mordicant quality of bodies must proceed from a fiery ingredient; whereas, not to urge that the light and inflamable parts, which are the most likely to belong to the element of fire, must probably be driven away by that time the violence of the fire has reduc'd the body to ashes; not to urge this, i i [transcriber's note: extra "i" in original] say, nor that oyle of vitriol which quenches fire, burnes the tongue and flesh of those that unwarily tast or apply it, as a caustick doth, it is precarious to prove the presence of fire in fixt salts from their caustick power, unlesse it were first shewn, that all the qualities ascribed to salts must be deduc'd from those of the elements; which, had i time, i could easily manifest to be no easy talk. and not to mention that our authour makes a body as homogeneous as any he can produce for elementary, belong both to water and fire, though it be neither fluid nor insipid, like water; nor light and volatile, like fire; he seems to omit in this anatomy the element of earth, save that he intimates, that the salt may pass for that; but since a few lines before, he takes ashes for earth, i see not how he will avoid an inconsistency either betwixt the parts of his discourse or betwixt some of them and his doctrine. for since there is a manifest difference betwixt the saline and the insipid parts of ashes, i see not how substances that disagree in such notable qualities can be both said to be portions of an element, whose nature requires that it be homogeneous, especially in this case where an _analysis_ by the fire is suppos'd to have separated it from the admixture of other elements, which are confess'd by most _aristotelians_ to be generally found in common earth, and to render it impure. and sure if when we have consider'd for how little a disparities sake the peripateticks make these symbolizing bodies aire and fire to be two distinct elements, we shall also consider that the saline part of ashes is very strongly tasted, and easily soluble in water; whereas the other part of the same ashes is insipid and indissoluble in the same liquor: not to add, that the one substance is opacous, and the other somewhat diaphanous, nor that they differ in divers other particulars; if we consider those things, i say, we shall hardly think that both these substances are elementary earth; and as to what is sometimes objected, that their saline tast is only an effect of incineration and adustion, it has been elsewhere fully reply'd to, when propos'd by _themistius_, and where it has been prov'd against him, that however insipid earth may perhaps by additaments be turn'd into salt, yet 'tis not like it should be so by the fire alone: for we see that when we refine gold and silver, the violentest fires we can employ on them give them not the least rellish of saltness. and i think _philoponus_ has rightly observ'd, that the ashes of some concretes contain very little salt if any at all; for refiners suppose that bone-ashes are free from it, and therefore make use of them for tests and cuppels, which ought to be destitute of salt, lest the violence of the fire should bring them to vitrification; and having purposely and heedfully tasted a cuppel made of only bone-ashes and fair water, which i had caus'd to be expos'd to a very violent fire, acuated by the blast of a large pair of double bellows, i could not perceive that the force of the fire had imparted to it the least saltness, or so much as made it less insipid. but (sayes _carneades_) since neither you nor i love repetitions, i shall not now make any of what else was urg'd against _themistius_ but rather invite you to take notice with me that when our authour, though a learned man, and one that pretends skill enough in chymistry to reforme the whole art, comes to make good his confident undertaking, to give us an occular demonstration of the immediate presence of the four elements in the resolution of green wood, he is fain to say things that agree very little with one another. for about the beginning of that passage of his lately recited to you, he makes the sweat as he calls it of the green wood to be water, the smoke aire, the shining matter fire, and the ashes earth; whereas a few lines after, he will in each of these, nay (as i just now noted) in one distinct part of the ashes, shew the four elements. so that either the former _analysis_ must be incompetent to prove that number of elements, since by it the burnt concrete is not reduc'd into elementary bodies, but into such as are yet each of them compounded of the four elements; or else these qualities from which he endeavours to deduce the presence of all the elements, in the fixt salt, and each of the other separated substances, will be but a precarious way of probation: especially if you consider, that the extracted _alcali_ of wood, being for ought appears at least as similar a body as any that the peripateticks can shew us, if its differing qualities must argue the presence of distinct elements, it will scarce be possible for them by any way they know of employing the fire upon a body, to shew that any body is a portion of a true element: and this recals to my mind, that i am now but in an occasional excussion, which aiming only to shew that the peripateticks as well as the chymists take in our present controversie something for granted which they ought to prove, i shall returne to my exceptions, where i ended the first of them, and further tell you, that neither is that the only precarious thing that i take notice of in _sennertus_ his argumentation; for when he inferrs, that because the qualities he mentions as colours, smels, and the like, belong not to the elements; they therefore must to the chymical principles, he takes that for granted, which will not in haste be prov'd; as i might here manifest, but that i may by and by have a fitter opportunity to take notice of it. and thus much at present may suffice to have discours'd against the supposition, that almost every quality must have some [greek: dektikon prôton], as they speak, some native receptacle, wherein as in its proper subject of inhesion it peculiarly resides, and on whose account that quality belongs to the other bodies, wherein it is to be met with. now this fundamental supposition being once destroy'd, whatsoever is built upon it, must fall to ruine of it self. but i consider further, that chymists are (for ought i have found) far from being able to explicate by any of the _tria prima_, those qualities which they pretend to belong primarily unto it, and in mixt bodies to deduce from it. tis true indeed, that such qualities are not explicable by the four elements; but it will not therefore follow, that they are so by the three hermetical principles; and this is it that seems to have deceiv'd the chymists, and is indeed a very common mistake amongst most disputants, who argue as if there could be but two opinions concerning the difficulty about which they contend; and consequently they inferr, that if their adversaries opinion be erroneous, their's must needs be the truth; whereas many questions, and especially in matters physiological, may admit of so many differing _hypotheses_, that 'twill be very inconsiderate and fallacious to conclude (except where the opinions are precisely contradictory) the truth of one from the falsity of another. and in our particular case 'tis no way necessary, that the properties of mixt bodies must be explicable either by the hermetical, or the _aristotelian hypothesis_, there being divers other and more plausible wayes of explaining them, and especially that, which deduces qualities from the motion, figure, and contrivance of the small parts of bodies; as i think might be shewn, if the attempt were as seasonable, as i fear it would be tedious. i will allow then, that the chymists do not causelessly accuse the doctrine of the four elements of incompetency to explain the properties of compound bodies. and for this rejection of a vulgar error, they ought not to be deny'd what praise men may deserve for exploding a doctrine whose imperfections are so conspicuous, that men needed but not to shut their eyes, to discover them. but i am mistaken, if our hermetical philosophers themselves need not, as well as the peripateticks, have recourse to more fruitfull and comprehensive principles then the _tria prima_, to make out the properties of the bodies they converse with. not to accumulate examples to this purpose, (because i hope for a fitter opportunity to prosecute this subject) let us at present only point at colour, that you may guess by what they say of so obvious and familiar a quality, how little instruction we are to expect from the _tria prima_ in those more abstruse ones, which they with the _aristotelians_ stile occult. for about colours, neither do they at all agree among themselves, nor have i met with any one, of which of the three perswasions soever, that does intelligibly explicate them. the vulgar chymists are wont to ascribe colours to mercury; _paracelsus_ in divers places attributes them to salt; and _sennertus_,[ ] having recited their differing opinions, dissents from both, and referrs colours rather unto sulphur. but how colours do, nay, how they may, arise from either of these principles, i think you will scarce say that any has yet intelligibly explicated. and if mr. _boyle_ will allow me to shew you the experiments which he has collected about colours, you will, i doubt not, confess that bodies exhibite colours, not upon the account of the predominancy of this or that principle in them, but upon that of their texture, and especially the disposition of their superficial parts, whereby the light rebounding thence to the eye is so modifi'd, as by differing impressions variously to affect the organs of sight. i might here take notice of the pleasing variety of colours exhibited by the triangular glass, (as 'tis wont to be call'd) and demand, what addition or decrement of either salt, sulphur, or mercury, befalls the body of the glass by being prismatically figur'd; and yet 'tis known, that without that shape it would not affor'd those colours as it does. but because it may be objected, that these are not real, but apparent colours; that i may not lose time in examing the distinction, i will alledge against the chymists, a couple of examples of real and permanent colours drawn from metalline bodies, and represent, that without the addition of any extraneous body, quicksilver may by the fire alone, and that in glass vessels, be depriv'd of its silver-like colour, and be turn'd into a red body; and from this red body without addition likewise may be obtain'd a mercury bright and specular as it was before; so that i have here a lasting colour generated and destroy'd (as i have seen) at pleasure, without adding or taking away either mercury, salt, or sulphur; and if you take a clean and slender piece of harden'd steel, and apply to it the flame of a candle at some little distance short of the point, you shall not have held the steel long in the flame, but you shall perceive divers colours, as yellow, red and blew, to appear upon the surface of the metal, and as it were run along in chase of one another towards the point; so that the same body, and that in one and the same part, may not only have a new colour produc'd in it, but exhibite successively divers colours within a minute of an hour, or thereabouts, and any of these colours may by removing the steel from the fire, become permanent, and last many years. and this production and variety of colours cannot reasonably be suppos'd to proceed from the accession of any of the three principles, to which of them soever chymists will be pleas'd to ascribe colours; especially considering, that if you but suddenly refrigerate that iron, first made red hot, it will be harden'd and colourless again; and not only by the flame of a candle, but by any other equivalent heat conveniently appli'd, the like colours will again be made to appear and succeed one another, as at the first. but i must not any further prosecute an occasional discourse, though that were not so difficult for me to do, as i fear it would be for the chymists to give a better account of the other qualities, by their principles, then they have done of colours. and your _sennertus_ himself (though an author i much value) would i fear have been exceedingly puzl'd to resolve, by the _tria prima_, halfe that catalogue of problems, which he challenges the vulgar peripateticks to explicate by their four elements.[ ] and supposing it were true, that salt or sulphur were the principle to which this or that quality may be peculiarly referr'd, yet though he that teaches us this teaches us something concerning that quality, yet he teaches us but something. for indeed he does not teach us that which can in any tollerable measure satisfie an inquisitive searcher after truth. for what is it to me to know, that such a quality resides in such a principle or element, whilst i remain altogether ignorant of the cause of that quality, and the manner of its production and operation? how little do i know more then any ordinary man of gravity, if i know but that the heaviness of mixt bodies proceeds from that of the earth they are compos'd of, if i know not the reason why the earth is heavy? and how little does the chymist teach the philosopher of the nature of purgatition, if he only tells him that the purgative vertue of medicines resides in their salt? for, besides that this must not be conceded without limitation, since the purging parts of many vegetables extracted by the water wherein they are infus'd, are at most but such compounded salts, (i mean mingl'd with oyle, and spirit, and earth, as tartar and divers other subjects of the vegetable kingdom afford;) and since too that quicksilver precipitated either with gold, or without addition, into a powder, is wont to be strongly enough cathartical, though the chymists have not yet prov'd, that either gold or mercury have any salt at all, much less any that is purgative; besides this, i say, how little is it to me, to know that 'tis the salt of the rhubarb (for instance) that purges, if i find that it does not purge as salt; since scarce any elementary salt is in small quantity cathartical. and if i know not how purgation in general is effected in a humane body? in a word, as 'tis one thing to know a mans lodging, and another, to be acquainted with him; so it may be one thing to know the subject wherein a quality principally resides, and another thing to have a right notion and knowledg of the quality its self. now that which i take to be the reason of this chymical deficiency, is the same upon whose account i think the _aristotelian_ and divers other theories incompetent to explicate the origen [errata: origine] of qualities. for i am apt to think, that men will never be able to explain the _phænomena_ of nature, while they endeavour to deduce them only from the presence and proportion of such or such material ingredients, and consider such ingredients or elements as bodies in a state of rest; whereas indeed the greatest part of the affections of matter, and consequently of the _phænomena_ of nature, seems to depend upon the motion and the continuance [errata: contrivance] of the small parts of bodies. for 'tis by motion that one part of matter acts upon another; and 'tis, for the most part, the texture of the body upon which the moving parts strike, that modifies to motion or impression, and concurrs with it to the production of those effects which make up the chief part of the naturalists theme. [footnote : _de cons. & dissen. cap. . pag. ._] [footnote : _sennert. de con. seus. [transcriber's note: consens.] & dissens. pag. . ._] but (sayes _eleutherius_) me thinks for all this, you have left some part of what i alledg'd in behalf of the three principles, unanswer'd. for all that you have said will not keep this from being a useful discovery, that since in the salt of one concrete, in the sulphur of another and the mercury of a third, the medicinal vertue of it resides, that principle ought to be separated from the rest, and there the desired faculty must be sought for. i never denyed (replyes _carneades_) that the notion of the _tria prima_ may be of some use, but (continues he laughing) by what you now alledg for it, it will but appear that it is useful to apothecaries, rather than to philosophers, the being able to make things operative being sufficient to those, whereas the knowledge of causes is the thing looked after by these. and let me tell you, _eleutherius_, even this it self will need to be entertained with some caution. for first, it will not presently follow, that if the purgative or other vertue of a simple may be easily extracted by water or spirit of wine, it resides in the salt or sulphur of the concrete; since unlesse the body have before been resolved by the fire, or some other powerful agent, it will, for the most part, afford in the liquors i have named, rather the finer compounded parts of it self, than the elementary ones. as i noted before, that water will dissolve not only pure salts, but crystals of tartar, gumme arabick, myrr'h, and other compound bodies. as also spirit of wine will dissolve not only the pure sulphur of concretes, but likewise the whole substance of divers resinous bodies, as benzoin, the gummous parts of jallap, gumme lacca, and other bodies that are counted perfectly mixt. and we see that the extracts made either with water or spirit of wine are not of a simple and elementary nature, but masses consisting of the looser corpuscles, and finer parts of the concretes whence they are drawn; since by distillation they may be divided into more elementary substances. next, we may consider that even when there intervenes a chymical resolution by he [transcriber's note: the] fire, 'tis seldom in the saline or sulphureous principle, as such, that the desir'd faculty of the concrete resides; but, as that titular salt or sulphur is yet a mixt body, though the saline or sulphureous nature be predominant in it. for, if in chymical resolutions the separated substances were pure and simple bodies, and of a perfect elementary nature; no one would be indued with more specifick vertues, than another; and their qualities would differ as little as do those of water. and let me add this upon the bye, that even eminent chymists have suffer'd themselves to be reprehended by me for their over great diligence in purifying some of the things they obtain by fire from mixt bodies. for though such compleatly purifyed ingredients of bodies might perhaps be more satisfactory to our understanding; yet others are often more useful to our lives, the efficacy of such chymical productions depending most upon what they retain of the bodies whence they are separated, or gain by the new associations of the dissipated among themselves; whereas if they were meerly elementary, their uses would be comparatively very small; and the vertues of sulphurs, salts, or other such substances of one denomination, would be the very same. and by the way (_eleutherius_) i am inclin'd upon this ground to think, that the artificial resolution of compound bodies by fire does not so much enrich mankind, as it divides them into their supposed principles; as upon the score of its making new compounds by now [transcriber's note: new] combinations of the dissipated parts of the resolv'd body. for by this means the number of mixt bodies is considerably increased. and many of those new productions are indow'd with useful qualities, divers of which they owe not to the body from which they were obtein'd, but to their newly acquired texture. but thirdly, that which is principally to be noted is this, that as there are divers concretes whose faculties reside in some one or other of those differing substances that chymists call their sulphurs, salts, and mercuries, and consequently may be best obtain'd, by analyzing the concrete whereby the desired principles may be had sever'd or freed from the rest; so there are other wherein the noblest properties lodge not in the salt, or sulphur, or mercury, but depend immediately upon the form (or if you will) result from the determinate structure of the whole concrete; and consequently they that go about to extract the vertues of such bodies, by exposing them to the violence of the fire, do exceedingly mistake, and take the way to destroy what they would obtain. i remmember that _helmont_ himself somewhere confesses, that as the fire betters some things and improves their vertues, so it spoyles others and makes them degenerate. and elsewhere he judiciously affirmes, that there may be sometimes greater vertue in a simple, such as nature has made it, than in any thing that can by the fire be separated from it. and lest you should doubt whether he means by the vertues of things those that are medical; he has in one place[ ] this ingenuous confession; _credo_ (sayes he) _simplicia in sua simplicitate esse sufficientia pro sanatione omnium morborum._ nag. [errata: nay,] barthias, even in a comment upon _beguinus_,[ ] scruples not to make this acknowledgment; _valde absurdum est_ (sayes he) _ex omnibus rebus extracta facere, salia, quintas essentias; præsertim ex substantiis per se plane vel subtilibus vel homogeneis, quales sunt uniones, corallia, moscus, ambra, &c._ consonantly whereunto he also tells us (and vouches the famous _platerus_, for having candidly given the same advertisement to his auditors,) that some things have greater vertues, and better suited to our humane nature, when unprepar'd, than when they have past the chymists fire; as we see, sayes my author, in pepper; of which some grains swallowed perform more towards the relief of a distempered stomack, than a great quantity of the oyle of the same spice. [footnote : helmont pharm. & dispens. nov. p. .] [footnote : vide jer. ad begu. lib. . cap. .] it has been (pursues _carneades_) by our friend here present observ'd concerning salt-petre, that none of the substances into which the fire is wont to divide it, retaines either the tast, the cooling vertue, or some other of the properties of the concrete; and that each of those substances acquires new qualities, not to be found in the salt-petre it self. the shining property of the tayls of gloworms does survive but so short a time the little animal made conspicuous by it, that inquisitive men have not scrupled publickly to deride _baptista porta_ and others; who deluded perhaps with some chymical surmises have ventur'd to prescribe the distillation of a water from the tayles of glowormes, as a sure way to obtain a liquor shining in the dark. to which i shall now add no other example than that afforded us by amber; which, whilst it remains an intire body, is endow'd with an electrical faculty of drawing to it self fethers, strawes, and such like bodies; which i never could observe either in its salt, its spirit, its oyle, or in the body i remember i once made by the reunion of its divided elements; none of these having such a texture as the intire concrete. and however chymists boldly deduce such and such properties from this or that proportion of their component principles; yet in concretes that abound with this or that ingredient, 'tis not alwayes so much by vertue of its presence, nor its plenty, that the concrete is qualify'd to perform such and such effects; as upon the account of the particular texture of that and the other ingredients, associated after a determinate manner into one concrete (though possibly such a proportion of that ingredient may be more convenient than an other for the constituting of such a body.) thus in a clock the hand is mov'd upon the dyal, the bell is struck, and the other actions belonging to the engine are perform'd, not because the wheeles are of brass or iron, or part of one metal and part of another, or because the weights are of lead, but by vertue of the size, shape, bigness, and co-aptation of the several parts; which would performe the same things though the wheels were of silver, or lead, or wood, and the weights of stone or clay; provided the fabrick or contrivance of the engine were the same: though it be not to be deny'd, that brasse and steel are more convenient materials to make clock-wheels of than lead, or wood. and to let you see, _eleutherius_, that 'tis sometimes at least, upon the texture of the small parts of a body, and not alwaies upon the presence, or recesse, or increase, or decrement of any one of its principle, that it may lose some such qualities, and acquire some such others as are thought very strongly inherent to the bodies they reside in. [errata: in;] i will add to what may from my past discourse be refer'd to this purpose, this notable example, from my own experience; that lead may without any additament, and only by various applications of the fire, lose its colour, and acquire sometimes a gray, sometimes a yellowish, sometimes a red, sometimes an _amethihstine_ [transcriber's note: amethistine] colour; and after having past through these, and perhaps divers others, again recover its leaden colour, and be made a bright body. that also this lead, which is so flexible a metal, may be made as brittle as glasse, and presently be brought to be again flexible and malleable as before. and besides, that the same lead, which i find by _microscopes_ to be one of the most opacous bodies in the world, may be reduced to a fine transparent glasse; whence yet it may returne to an opacous nature again; and all this, as i said, without the addition of any extraneous body, and meerly by the manner and method of exposing it to the fire. but (sayes _carneades_) after having already put you to so prolix a trouble, it is time for me to relieve you with a promise of putting speedily a period to it; and to make good that promise, i shall from all that i have hitherto discoursed with you, deduce but this one proposition by way of corollary. [_that it may as yet be doubted, whether or no there be any determinate number of elements; or, if you please, whether or no all compound bodies, do consist of the same number of elementary ingredients or material principles._] this being but an inference from the foregoing discourse, it will not be requisite to insist at large on the proofs of it; but only to point at the chief of them, and referr you for particulars to what has been already delivered. in the first place then, from what has been so largely discours'd, it may appear, that the experiments wont to be brought, whether by the common peripateticks, or by the vulgar chymists, to demonstrate that all mixt bodies are made up precisely either of the four elements, or the three hypostatical principles, do not evince what they are alledg'd to prove. and as for the other common arguments, pretended to be drawn from reason in favour of _aristotelian hypothesis_ (for the chymists are wont to rely almost altogether upon experiments) they are commonly grounded upon such unreasonable or precarious suppositions, that 'tis altogether as easie and as just for any man to reject them, as for those that take them for granted to assert them, being indeed all of them as indemonstrable as the conclusion to be inferr'd from them; and some of them so manifestly weak and prooflesse; that he must be a very courteous adversary, that can be willing to grant them; and as unskilful a one, that can be compelled to do so. in the next place, it may be considered, if what those patriarchs of the _spagyrists_, _paracelsus_ and _helmont_, do on divers occasions positively deliver, be true; namely that the _alkahest_ does resolve all mixt bodies into other principles than the fire, it must be decided which of the two resolutions (that made by the _alkahest_, or that made by the fire) shall determine the number of the elements, before we can be certain how many there are. and in the mean time, we may take notice in the last place, that as the distinct substances whereinto the _alkahest_ divides bodies, are affirm'd to be differing in nature from those whereunto they are wont to be reduc'd by fire, and to be obtain'd from some bodies more in number than from some others; since he tells us, he could totally reduce all sorts of stones into salt only, whereas of a coal he had two distinct liquors.[ ] so, although we should acquiesce in that resolution which is made by fire, we find not that all mixt bodies are thereby divided into the same number of elements and principles; some concretes affordding more of them than others do; nay and sometimes this or that body affording a greater number of differing substances by one way of management, than the same yields by another. and they that out of gold, or mercury, or muscovy-glasse, will draw me as many distinct substances as i can separate from vitriol, or from the juice of grapes variously orderd, may teach me that which i shall very thankfully learn. nor does it appear more congruous to that variety that so much conduceth to the perfection of the universe, that all elemented bodies be compounded of the same number of elements, then it would be for a language, that all its words should consist of the same number of letters. [footnote : _novi saxum & lapides omnes in merum salem suo saxo aut lapidi & æquiponderantem reducere absque omni prorsus sulphure aut mercurio._ helmont. pag. .] the sceptical chymist or, _a paradoxical appendix to the foregoing treatise._ _the sixth part._ here _carneades_ having dispach't what he thought requisite to oppose against what the chymists are wont to alledge for proof of their three principles, paus'd awhile, and look'd about him, to discover whether it were time for him and his friend to rejoyne the rest of the company. but _eleutherius_ perceiving nothing yet to forbid them to prosecute their discourse a little further, said to his friend, (who had likewise taken notice of the same thing) i halfe expected, _carneades_, that after you had so freely declar'd your doubting, whether there be any determinate number of elements, you would have proceeded to question whether there be any elements at all. and i confess it will be a trouble to me if you defeat me of my expectation; especially since you see the leasure we have allow'd us may probably suffice to examine that paradox; because you have so largly deduc'd already many things pertinent to it, that you need but intimate how you would have them apply'd, and what you would inferr from them. _carneades_ having in vain represented that their leasure could be but very short, that he had already prated very long, that he was unprepared to maintain so great and so invidious a paradox, was at length prevail'd with to tell his friend; since, _eleutherius_, you will have me discourse _ex tempore_ of the paradox you mention, i am content, (though more perhaps to express my obedience, then my opinion) to tell you that (supposing the truth of _helmonts_ and _paracelsus's_ alkahestical experiments, if i may so call them) though it may seem extravagant, yet it is not absurd to doubt, whether, for ought has been prov'd, there be a necessity to admit any elements, or hypostatical principles, at all. and, as formerly, so now, to avoid the needless trouble of disputing severally with the _aristotelians_ and the chymists, i will address my self to oppose them i have last nam'd, because their doctrine about the elements is more applauded by the moderns, as pretending highly to be grounded upon experience. and, to deal not only fairly but favourably with them, i will allow them to take in earth and water to their other principles. which i consent to, the rather that my discourse may the better reach the tenents of the peripateticks; who cannot plead for any so probably as for those two elements; that of fire above the air being generally by judicious men exploded as an imaginary thing; and the air not concurring to compose mixt bodies as one of their elements, but only lodging in their pores, or rather replenishing, by reason of its weight and fluidity, all those cavities of bodies here below, whether compounded or not, that are big enough to admit it, and are not fill'd up with any grosser substance. and, to prevent mistakes, i must advertize you, that i now mean by elements, as those chymists that speak plainest do by their principles, certain primitive and simple, or perfectly unmingled bodies; which not being made of any other bodies, or of one another, are the ingredients of which all those call'd perfectly mixt bodies are immediately compounded, and into which they are ultimately resolved: now whether there be any one such body to be constantly met with in all, and each, of those that are said to be elemented bodies, is the thing i now question. by this state of the controversie you will, i suppose, guess, that i need not be so absur'd [errata: absurd] as to deny that there are such bodies as earth, and water, and quicksilver, and sulphur: but i look upon earth and water, as component parts of the universe, or rather of the terrestrial globe, not of all mixt bodies. and though i will not peremptorily deny that there may sometimes either a running mercury, or a combustible substance be obtain'd from a mineral, or even a metal; yet i need not concede either of them to be an element in the sence above declar'd; as i shall have occasion to shew you by and by. to give you then a brief account of the grounds i intend to proceed upon, i must tell you, that in matters of philosophy, this seems to me a sufficient reason to doubt of a known and important proposition, that the truth of it is not yet by any competent proof made to appear. and congruously herunto, if i shew that the grounds upon which men are perswaded that there are elements are unable to satisfie a considering man, i suppose my doubts will appear rational. now the considerations that induce men to think that there are elements, may be conveniently enough referr'd to two heads. namely, the one, that it is necessary that nature make use of elements to constitute the bodies that are reputed mixt. and the other, that the resolution of such bodies manifests that nature had compounded them of elementary ones. in reference to the former of these considerations, there are two or three things that i have to represent. and i will begin with reminding you of the experiments i not long since related to you concerning the growth of pompions, mint, and other vegetables, out of fair water. for by those experiments its seems evident, that water may be transmuted into all the other elements; from whence it may be inferr'd, both, that 'tis not every thing chymists will call salt, sulphur, or spirit, that needs alwayes be a primordiate and ingenerable body. and that nature may contex a plant (though that be a perfectly mixt concrete) without having all the elements previously presented to her to compound it of. and, if you will allow the relation i mention'd out of _mounsieur de rochas_ to be true; then may not only plants, but animals and minerals too, be produced out of water, and however there is little doubt to be made, but that the plants my tryals afforded me as they were like in so many other respects to the rest of the plants of the same denomination; so they would, in case i had reduc'd them to putrefaction, have likewise produc'd wormes or other insects, as well as the resembling vegetables are wont to do; so that water may, by various seminal principles, be successively transmuted into both plants and animals. and if we consider that not only men, but even sucking children are, but too often, tormented with solid stones, but that divers sorts of beasts themselves, (whatever _helmont_ against experience think to the contrary) may be troubled with great and heavy stones in their kidneys and bladders, though they feed but upon grass and other vegetables, that are perhaps but disguised water, it will not seem improbable that even some concretes of a mineral nature, may likewise be form'd of water. we may further take notice, that as a plant may be nourisht, and consequently may consist of common water; so may both plants and animals, (perhaps even from their seminal rudiments) consist of compound bodies, without having any thing meerly elementary brought them by nature to be compounded by them: this is evident in divers men, who whilst they were infants were fed only with milk, afterwards live altogether upon flesh, fish, wine, and other perfectly mixt bodies. it may be seen also in sheep, who on some of our english downs or plains, grow very fat by feeding upon the grasse, without scarce drinking at all. and yet more manifestly in the magots that breed and grow up to their full bignesse within the pulps of apples, pears, or the like fruit. we see also, that dungs that abound with a mixt salt give a much more speedy increment to corn and other vegetables than water alone would do: and it hath been assur'd me, by a man experienc'd in such matters, that sometimes when to bring up roots very early, the mould they were planted in was made over-rich, the very substance of the plant has tasted of the dung. and let us also consider a graft of one kind of fruit upon the upper bough of a tree of another kind. as for instance, the ciens of a pear upon a white-thorne; for there the ascending liquor is already alter'd, either by the root, or in its ascent by the bark, or both wayes, and becomes a new mixt body: as may appear by the differing qualities to be met with in the saps of several trees; as particularly, the medicinal vertue of the birch-water (which i have sometimes drunk upon _helmonts_ great and not undeserved commendation) now the graft, being fasten'd to the stock must necessarily nourish its self, and produce its fruit, only out of this compound juice prepared for it by the stock, being unable to come at any other aliment. and if we consider, how much of the vegetable he feeds upon may (as we noted above) remain in an animal; we may easily suppose, that the blood of that animal who feeds upon this, though it be a well constituted liquor, and have all the differing corpuscles that make it up kept in order by one præsiding form, may be a strangely decompounded body, many of its parts being themselves decompounded. so little is it necessary that even in the mixtures which nature her self makes in animal and vegetable bodies, she should have pure elements at hand to make her compositions of. having said thus much touching the constitution of plants and animals, i might perhaps be able to say as much touching that of minerals, and even metalls, if it were as easy for us to make experiment in order to the production of these, as of those. but the growth or increment of minerals being usually a work of excessively long time, and for the most part perform'd in the bowels of the earth, where we cannot see it, i must instead of experiments make use, on this occasion, of observations. that stones were not all made at once, but that are some of them now adayes generated, may (though it be deny'd by some) be fully prov'd by several examples, of which i shall now scarce alledg any other, then that famous place in _france_ known by the name of _les caves gentieres_ [errata: goutieres], where the water falling from the upper parts of the cave to the ground does presently there condense into little stones, of such figures as the drops, falling either severally or upon one another, and coagulating presently into stone, chance to exhibit. of these stones some ingenuous friends of ours, that went a while since to visit that place, did me the favour to present me with some that they brought thence. and i remember that both that sober relator of his voyages, _van linschoten_, and another good author, inform us that in the diamond mines (as they call them) in the _east-indies_, when having dig'd the earth, though to no great depth, they find diamonds and take them quite away; yet in a very few years they find in the same place new diamonds produc'd there since. from both which relations, especially the first, it seems probable that nature does not alwayes stay for divers elementary bodies, when she is to produce stones. and as for metals themselves, authors of good note assure us, that even they were not in the beginning produc'd at once altogether, but have been observ'd to grow; so that what was not a mineral or metal before became one afterwards. of this it were easie to alledg many testimonies of professed chymists. but that they may have the greater authority, i shall rather present you with a few borrowed from more unsuspected writers. _sulphuris mineram_ (as the inquisitive _p. fallopius_ notes) _quæ nutrix est caloris subterranei fabri seu archæi fontium & mineralium, infra terram citissime renasci testantur historiæ metallicæ. sunt enim loca e quibus si hoc anno sulphur effossum fuerit; intermissa fossione per quadriennium redeunt fossores & omnia sulphure, ut autea [errata: antea], rursus inveniunt plena._ _pliny_ relates, _in italiæ insula ilva, gigni ferri metallum._ strabo _multo expressius; effossum ibi metallum semper regenerari. nam si effossio spatio centum annorum intermittebatur, & iterum illuc revertebantur, fossores reperisse maximam copiam ferri regeneratam._ which history not only is countenanced by _fallopius_, from the incom which the iron of that island yielded the duke of _florence_ in his time; but is mention'd more expressely to our purpose, by the learned _cesalpinus_. _vena_ (sayes he) _ferri copiosissima est in italia; ob eam nobilitata ilva tirrheni maris insula incredibili copia, etiam nostris temporibus eam gignens: nam terra quæ eruitur dum vena effoditur tota, procedente tempore in venam convertitur._ which last clause is therefore very notable, because from thence we may deduce, that earth, by a metalline plastick principle latent in it, may be in processe of time chang'd into a metal. and even _agricola_ himself, though the chymists complain of him as their adversary, acknowledges thus much and more; by telling us that at a town called _saga_ in _germany_,[ ] they dig up iron in the fields, by sinking ditches two foot deep; and adding, that within the space of ten years the ditches are digged again for iron since produced, as the same metal is wont to be obtain'd in _elva_. also concerning lead, not to mention what even _galen_ notes, that it will increase both in bulk and weight if it be long kept in vaults or sellars, where the air is gross and thick, as he collects from the smelling of those pieces of lead that were imploy'd to fasten together the parts of old statues. not to mention this, i say, _boccacius certaldus_, as i find him quoted by a diligent writer, has this passage touching the growth of lead. _fessularum mons_ (sayes he) _in hetruria, florentiæ civitati imminens, lapides plumbarios habet; qui si excidantur, brevi temporis spatio, novis incrementis instaurantur; ut_ (annexes my author) _tradit boccacius certaldus, qui id compotissimum [errata: compertissimum] esse scribit. nihil hoc novi est; sed de eadem plinius, lib. . hist. natur. cap. . dudum prodidit, inquiens, mirum in his solis plumbi metallis, quod derelicta fertilius reviviscunt. in plumbariis secundo lapide ab amberga dictis ad asylum recrementa congesta in cumulos, exposita solibus pluviisque paucis annis, redunt suum metallum cum fenore._ i might add to these, continues _carneades_, many things that i have met with concerning the generation of gold and silver. but, for fear of wanting time, i shall mention but two or three narratives. the first you may find recorded by _gerhardus_ the physick professor, in these words. _in valle_ (sayes he) _joachimaca [errata: joachimica] argentum gramini [errata: graminis] modo & more e lapidibus mineræ velut e radice excrevisse digiti longitudine, testis est dr. schreterus, qui ejusmodi venas aspectu jucundas & admirabiles domi sua aliis sæpe monstravit & donavit. item aqua cærulea inventa est annebergæ, ubi argentum erat adhuc in primo ente, quæ coagulata redacta est in calcem fixi & boni argenti._ [footnote : _in lygiis, ad sagam opidum; in pratis eruitur ferrum, fossis ad altitudinem bipedaneam actis. id decennio renatum denuo foditur non aliter ac ilvæ ferrum._] the other two relations i have not met with in latine authours, and yet they are both very memorable in themselves, and as pertinent to our present purpose. the first i meet with in the commentary of _johannes valehius_ upon the _kleine baur_, in which that industrious chymist relates, with many circumstances, that at a mine-town (if i may so english the german _bergstat_) eight miles or leagues distant from _strasburg_ call'd _mariakirch_, a workman came to the overseer, and desired employment; but he telling him that there was not any of the best sort at present for him, added that till he could be preferr'd to some such, he might in the mean time, to avoid idleness, work in a grove or mine-pit thereabouts, which at that time was little esteem'd. this workman after some weeks labour, had by a crack appearing in the stone upon a stroak given near the wall, an invitation given him to work his way through, which as soon as he had done, his eyes were saluted by a mighty stone or lump which stood in the middle of the cleft (that had a hollow place behind it) upright, and in shew like an armed-man; but consisted of pure fine silver having no vein or ore by it, or any other additament, but stood there free, having only underfoot something like a burnt matter; and yet this one lump held in weight above a marks, which, according to the dutch, account [errata: dutch account] makes pound weight of fine silver. from which and other circumstances my author gathers; that by the warmth of the place, the noble metalline spirits, (sulphureous and mercurial) were carri'd from the neighbouring galleries or vaults, through other smaller cracks and clefts, into that cavity, and there collected as in a close chamber or cellar; whereinto when they were gotten, they did in process of time settle into the forementioned precious mass of metal. the other germane relation is of that great traveller and laborious chymist _johannes_ (not _georgus_) _agricola_; who in his notes upon what _poppius_ has written of antimony, relates, that when he was among the _hungarian_ mines in the deep groves, he observ'd that there would often arise in them a warm steam (not of that malignant sort which the germains call _shwadt_, which (sayes he) is a meer poyson, and often suffocates the diggers [errata: diggers)], which fasten'd it self to the walls; and that coming again to review it after a couple of dayes, he discern'd that it was all very fast, and glistering; whereupon having collected it and distill'd it _per retortam_, he obtain'd from it a fine spirit, adding, that the mine-men inform'd him, that this steam or damp of the english mine [errata: damp as the englishmen also call it] (retaining the dutch term) would at last have become a metal, as gold or silver. i referr (sayes _carneades_) to another occasion, the use that may be made of these narratives towards the explicating the nature of metalls; and that of fixtness, malleableness, and some other qualities conspicuous in them. and in the mean time, this i may at present deduce from these observations, that 'tis not very probable, that, whensoever a mineral, or even a metall, is to be generated in the bowels of the earth, nature needs to have at hand both salt, and sulphur, and mercury to compound it of; for, not to urge that the two last relations seem less to favour the chymists than _aristotle_, who would have metals generated of certain _halitus_ or steams, the foremention'd observations together, make it seem more likely that the mineral earths or those metalline steams (wherewith probably such earths are plentifully imbu'd) do contain in them some seminal rudiment, or some thing equivalent thereunto; by whose plastick power the rest of the matter, though perhaps terrestrial and heavy, is in tract of time fashion'd into this or that metalline ore; almost as i formerly noted, that fair water was by the seminal principle of mint, pompions, and other vegetables, contriv'd into bodies answerable to such seeds. and that such alterations of terrestrial matter are not impossible, seems evident from that notable practice of the boylers of salt-petre, who unanimously observe, as well here in _england_ as in other countries; that if an earth pregnant with nitre be depriv'd, by the affusion of water, of all its true and dissoluble salt, yet the earth will after some years yield them salt-petre again; for which reason some of the eminent and skillfullest of them keep it in heaps as a perpetual mine of salt petre; whence it may appear, that the seminal principle of nitre latent in the earth does by degrees transforme the neighbouring matter into a nitrous body; for though i deny that some volatile nitre may by such earths be attracted (as they speak) out of the air, yet that the innermost parts of such great heaps that lye so remote from the air should borrow from it all the nitre they abound with, is not probable, for other reasons besides the remoteness of the air, though i have not the leasure to mention them. and i remember, that a person of great credit, and well acquainted with the wayes of making vitriol, affirm'd to me, that he had observ'd, that a kind of mineral which abounds in that salt, being kept within doors and not expos'd (as is usual) to the free air and rains, did of it self in no very long time turn into vitriol, not only in the outward or superficial, but even in the internal and most central parts. and i also remember, that i met with a certain kind of merkasite that lay together in great quantities under ground, which did, even in my chamber, in so few hours begin of it self to turne into vitriol, that we need not distrust the newly recited narrative. but to return to what i was saying of nitre; as nature made this salt-petre out of the once almost and inodorous earth it was bred in, and did not find a very stinking and corrosive acid liquor, and a sharp alcalyzate salt to compound it of, though these be the bodies into which the fire dissolves it; so it were not necessary that nature should make up all metals and other minerals of pre-existent salt, and sulphur, and mercury, though such bodies might by fire be obtained from it. which one consideration duly weigh'd is very considerable in the present controversy: and to this agree well the relations of our two german chymists; for besides that it cannot be convincingly prov'd, it is not so much as likely that so languid and moderate a heat as that within the mines, should carry up to so great a heat [errata: height], though in the forme of fumes, salt, sulphur and mercury; since we find in our distillations, that it requires a considerable degree of fire to raise so much as to the height of one foot not only salt, but even mercury it self, in close vessels. and if it be objected, that it seems by the stink that is sometimes observ'd when lightening falls down here below, that sulphureous steams may ascend very high without any extraordinary degree of heat; it may be answer'd, among other things, that the sulphur of silver is by chymists said to be a fixt sulphur, though not altogether so well digested as that of gold. but, proceeds _carneades_, if it had not been to afford you some hints concerning the origine of metals, i need not have deduc'd any thing from these observations; it not being necessary to the validity of my argument that my deductions from them should be irrefragable, because my adversaries the _aristotelians_ and vulgar chymists do not, i presume, know any better then i, _a priori_, of what ingredients nature compounds metals and minerals. for their argument to prove that those bodies are made up of such principles, is drawn _a posteriori_; i mean from this, that upon the _analysis_ of mineral bodies they are resolv'd into those differing substances. that we may therefore examine this argument, let us proceed to consider what can be alledg'd in behalf of the elements from the resolutions of bodies by the fire; which you remember was the second tophick [transcriber's note: topick] whence i told you the arguments of my adversaries were desum'd. and that i may first dispatch what i have to say concerning minerals, i will begin the remaining part of my discourse with considering how the fire divides them. and first, i have partly noted above, that though chymists pretend from some to draw salt, from others running mercury, and from others a sulphur; yet they have not hitherto taught us by any way in us [errata: use] among them to separate any one principle, whether salt, sulphur, or mercury, from all sorts of minerals without exception. and thence i may be allow'd to conclude that there is not any of the elements that is an ingredient of all bodies, since there are some of which it is not so. in the next place, supposing that either sulphur or mercury were obtainable from all sorts of minerals. yet still this sulphur or mercury would be but a compounded, not an elementary body, as i told you already on another occasion. and certainly he that takes notice of the wonderful operations of quicksilver, whether it be common, or drawn from mineral bodies, can scarce be so inconsiderate as to think it of the very same nature with that immature and fugitive substance which in vegetables and animals chymists have been pleas'd to call their mercury. so that when mercury is got by the help of the fire out of a metal or other mineral body, if we will not suppose that it was not pre-existent in it, but produc'd by the action of the fire upon the concrete, we may at least suppose this quicksilver to have been a perfect body of its own kind (though perhaps lesse heterogeneous then more secundary mixts) which happen'd to be mingl'd _per minima_, and coagulated with the other substances, whereof the metal or mineral consisted. as may be exemplyfied partly by native vermillion wherein the quicksilver and sulphur being exquisitely blended both with one another, and that other course mineral stuff (what ever it be) that harbours them, make up a red body differing enough from both; and yet from which part of the quicksilver, and of the sulphur, may be easily enough obtain'd; partly by those mines wherein nature has so curiously incorporated silver with lead, that 'tis extreamly difficult, and yet possible, to separate the former out of the latter. [errata: latter;] and partly too by native vitriol, wherein the metalline corpuscles are by skill and industry separable from the saline ones, though they be so con-coagulated with them, that the whole concrete is reckon'd among salts. and here i further observe, that i never could see any earth or water, properly so call'd, separated from either gold or silver (to name now no other metalline bodies) and therefore to retort the argument upon my adversaries, i may conclude, that since there are some bodies in which, for ought appears, there is neither earth nor water. [errata: water;] i may be allow'd to conclude that neither of those two is an universal ingredient of all those bodies that are counted perfectly mixt, which i desire you would remember against anon. it may indeed be objected, that the reason why from gold or silver we cannot separate any moisture, is, because that when it is melted out of the oare, the vehement fire requisite to its fusion forc'd away all the aqueous and fugitive moisture; and the like fire may do from the materials of glass. to which i shall answer, that i remember i read not long since in the learned _josephus acosta_,[ ] who relates it upon his own observation; that in _america_, (where he long lived) there is a kind of silver which the _indians_ call _papas_, and sometimes (sayes he) they find pieces very fine and pure like to small round roots, the which is rare in that metal, but usuall in gold; concerning which metal he tells us, that besides this they find some which they call gold in grains, which he tells us are small morsels of gold that they find whole without mixture of any other metal, which hath no need of melting or refining in the fire. [footnote : _acosta_ natural and moral history of the indies, l. . c. , p. .] i remember that a very skilful and credible person affirmed to me, that being in the _hungarian_ mines he had the good fortune to see a mineral that was there digg'd up, wherein pieces of gold of the length, and also almost of the bigness of a humane finger, grew in the oar, as if they had been parts and branches of trees. and i have my self seen a lump of whitish mineral, that was brought as a rarity to a great and knowing prince, wherein there grew here and there in the stone, which looked like a kind of sparr, divers little lumps of fine gold, (for such i was assured that tryal had manifested it to be) some of them seeming to be about the bigness of pease. but that is nothing to what our _acosta_ subjoynes, which is indeed very memorable, namely, that of the morsels of native and pure gold, which we lately heard him mentioning he had now and then seen some that weighed many pounds;[ ] to which i shall add, that i my self have seen a lump of oar not long since digged up, in whose stony part there grew, almost like trees, divers parcels though not of gold, yet of (what perhaps mineralists will more wonder at) another metal which seemed to be very pure or unmixt with any heterogeneous substances, and were some of them as big as my finger, if not bigger. but upon observations of this kind, though perhaps i could, yet i must not at present dwell any longer. [footnote : see _acosta_ in the fore-cited place, and the passage of _pliny_ quoted by him.] to proceed therefore now (sayes _carneades_) to the consideration of the _analysis_ of vegetables, although my tryals give me no cause to doubt but that out of most of them five differing substances may be obtain'd by the fire, yet i think it will not be so easily demonstrated that these deserve to be call'd elements in the notion above explain'd. and before i descend to particulars, i shall repeat and premise this general consideration, that these differing substances that are call'd elements or principles, differ not from each other as metals, plants and animals, or as such creatures as are immediately produc'd each by its peculiar seed, and constitutes a distinct propagable sort of creatures in the universe; but these are only various schemes of matter or substances that differ from each other, but in consistence (as running mercury and the same metal congeal'd by the vapor of lead) and some very few other accidents, as tast, or smel, or inflamability, or the want of them. so that by a change of texture not impossible to be wrought by the fire and other agents that have the faculty not only to dissociate the smal parts of bodies, but afterwards to connect them after a new manner, the same parcell of matter may acquire or lose such accidents as may suffice to denominate it salt, or sulphur, or earth. if i were fully to clear to you my apprehensions concerning this matter, i should perhaps be obliged to acquaint you with divers of the conjectures (for i must yet call them no more) i have had concerning the principles of things purely corporeal: for though because i seem not satisfi'd with the vulgar doctrines, either of the peripatetick or paracelsian schools, many of those that know me, (and perhaps, among them, _eleutherius_ himself) have thought me wedded to the epicurean _hypotheses_, (as others have mistaken me for an _helmontian_;) yet if you knew how little conversant i have been with _epicurean_ authors, and how great a part of _lucretius_ himself i never yet had the curiosity to read, you would perchance be of another mind; especially if i were to entertain you at large, i say not, of my present notions; but of my former thoughts concerning the principles of things. but, as i said above, fully to clear my apprehensions would require a longer discourse than we can now have. for, i should tell you that i have sometimes thought it not unfit, that to the principles which may be assign'd to things, as the world is now constituted, we should, if we consider the great mass of matter as it was whilst the universe was in making, add another, which may conveniently enough be call'd an architectonick principle or power; by which i mean those various determinations, and that skilfull guidance of the motions of the small parts of the universal matter by the most wise author of things, which were necessary at the beginning to turn that confus'd _chaos_ into this orderly and beautifull world; and especially, to contrive the bodies of animals and plants, and the seeds of those things whose kinds were to be propagated. for i confess i cannot well conceive, how from matter, barely put into motion, and then left to it self, there could emerge such curious fabricks as the bodies of men and perfect animals, and such yet more admirably contriv'd parcels of matter, as the seeds of living creatures. i should likewise tell you upon what grounds, and in what sence, i suspected the principles of the world, as it now is, to be three, _matter_, _motion_ and _rest_. i say, _as the world now is_, because the present fabrick of the universe, and especially the seeds of things, together with the establisht course of nature, is a requisite or condition, upon whose account divers things may be made out by our three principles, which otherwise would be very hard, if possible, to explicate. i should moreover declare in general (for i pretend not to be able to do it otherwise) not only why i conceive that colours, odors, tasts, fluidness and solidity, and those other qualities that diversifie and denominate bodies may intelligibly be deduced from these three; _but how two of the three_ epicurean principles (which, i need not tell, you [transcriber's note: tell you,] are magnitude, figure and weight) are themselves deducible from matter and motion; since the latter of these variously agitating, and, as it were, distracting the former, must needs disjoyne its parts; which being actually separated must each of them necessarily both be of some size, and obtain some shape or other. nor did i add to our principles the _aristotelean privation_, partly for other reasons, which i must not now stay to insist on; and partly because it seems to be rather an antecedent, or a _terminus a quo_, then a true principle, as the starting-post is none of the horses legs or limbs. i should also explain why and how i made rest [errata: rest] to be, though not so considerable a principle of things, as motion, yet a principle of them; partly because it is (for ought we know [errata: know)] as ancient at least as it, and depends not upon motion, nor any other quality of matter; and partly, because it may enable the body in which it happens to be, both to continue in a state of rest till some external force put it out of that state, and to concur to the production of divers changes in the bodies that hit against it, by either quite stopping or lessning their motion (whilst the body formerly at rest receives all or part of it into it self) or else by giving a new byass, or some other modification, to motion, that is, to the grand and primary instrument whereby nature produces all the changes and other qualities that are to be met with in the world. i should likewise, after all this, explain to you how, although matter, motion and rest, seem'd to me to be the catholick principles of the universe, i thought the principles of particular bodies might be commodiously enough reduc'd to two, namely _matter_, and (what comprehends the two other, and their effects) the result or aggregate [errata: aggregate or complex] of those accidents, which are the motion or rest, (for in some bodies both are not to be found) the bigness, figure, texture) [errata: delete )] and the thence resulting qualities of the small parts) [errata: delete )] which are necessary to intitle the body whereto they belong to this or that peculiar denomination; and discriminating it from others to appropriate it to a determinate kind of things, as [errata: (as] yellowness, fixtness, such a degree of weight, and of ductility, do make the portion of matter wherein they concur, to be reckon'd among perfect metals, and obtain the name of gold.) which [errata: this] aggregate or result of accidents you may, if you please, call either _structure_ or texture. [errata: no paragraph break] though [errata: (though] indeed, that do not so properly comprehend the motion of the constituent parts especially in case some of them be fluid [errata: fluid)], or what other appellation shall appear most expressive. or if, retaining the vulgar terme, you will call it the _forme_ of the thing it denominates, i shall not much oppose it; provided the word be interpreted to mean but what i have express'd, and not a scholastick _substantial forme_, which so many intelligent men profess to be to them altogether un-intelligible. but, sayes _carneades_, if you remember that 'tis a sceptick speaks to you, and that 'tis not so much my present talk to make assertions as to suggest doubts, i hope you will look upon what i have propos'd, rather as a narrative of my former conjectures touching the principles of things, then as a resolute declaration of my present opinions of them; especially since although they cannot but appear very much to their disadvantage, if you consider them as they are propos'd without those reasons and explanations by which i could perhaps make them appear much lesse extravagant; yet i want time to offer you what may be alledg'd to clear and countenance these notions; my design in mentioning them unto you at present being, _partly_, to bring some light and confirmation to divers passages of my discourse to you; _partly_ to shew you, that i do not (as you seem to have suspected) embrace all _epicurus_ his principles; but dissent from him in some main things, as well as from _aristotle_ and the chymists, in others; & _partly_ also, or rather chiefly, to intimate to you the grounds upon which i likewise differ from _helmont_ in this, that whereas he ascribes almost all things, and even diseases themselves, to their determinate seeds; i am of opinion, that besides the peculiar fabricks of the bodies of plants and animals (and perhaps also of some metals and minerals) which i take to be the effects of seminal principles, there are many other bodies in nature which have and deserve distinct and proper names, but yet do but result from such contextures of the matter they are made of, as may without determinate seeds be effected by heat, cold, artificial mixtures and compositions, and divers other causes which sometimes nature imployes of her own accord; and oftentimes man by his power and skill makes use of to fashion the matter according to his intentions. this may be exemplified both in the productions of nature, and in those of art; of the first sort i might name multitudes; but to shew how sleight a variation of textures without addition of new ingredients may procure a parcel of matter divers names, and make it be lookt upon as different things; i shall invite you to observe with me, that clouds, rain, hail, snow, froth, and ice, may be but water, having its parts varyed as to their size and distance in respect of each other, and as to motion and rest. and among artificial productions we may take notice (to skip the crystals of tartar) of glass, regulus, martis-stellatus [errata: regulus martis stellatus], and particularly of the sugar of lead, which though made of that insipid metal and sour salt of vinager, has in it a sweetnesse surpassing that of common sugar, and divers other qualities, which being not to be found in either of its two ingredients, must be confess'd to belong to the concrete it self, upon the account of its texture. this consideration premis'd, it will be, i hope, the more easie to perswade you that the fire may as well produce some new textures in a parcel of matter, as destroy the old. wherefore hoping that you have not forgot the arguments formerly imploy'd against the doctrine of the _tria prima_; namely that the salt, sulphur and mercury, into which the fire seems to resolve vegetable and animal bodies, are yet compounded, not simple and elementary substances; and that (as appeared by the experiment of pompions) the _tria prima_ may be made out of water; hoping i say, that you remember these and the other things that i formerly represented to the same purpose, i shall now add only, that if we doubt not the truth of some of _helmonts_ relation [errata: relations], we may well doubt whether any of these heterogeneities be (i say not pre-existent, so as to convene together, when a plant or animal is to be constituted but) so much as in-existent in the concrete whence they are obtain'd, when the chymists [errata: chymist] first goes about to resolve it; for not to insist upon the un-inflamable spirit of such concretes, because that may be pretended to be but a mixture of phlegme and salt; the oyle or sulphur of vegetables or animals is, according to him, reducible by the help of lixiviate salts into sope; as that sope is by the help of repeated distillations from a _caput mortuum_ of chalk into insipid water. and as for the saline substance that seems separable from mixt bodies; the same _helmonts_ tryals[ ] give us cause to think, that it may be a production of the fire, which by transporting and otherwise altering the particles of the matter, does bring it to a saline nature. [footnote : _omne autem alcali addita pinguedine in aqueum liquorem, qui tandem mera & simplex aqua fit, reducitur, (ut videre est in sapone, lazurio lapide, &c.) quoties per adjuncta fixa semen pinguedinis deponit._ helmont.] for i know (sayes he, in the place formerly alledg'd to another purpose) a way to reduce all stones into a meer salt of equal weight with the stone whence it was produc'd, and that without any of the least either sulphur or mercury; which asseveration of my author would perhaps seem less incredible to you, if i durst acquaint you with all i could say upon that subject. and hence by the way you may also conclude that the sulphur and mercury, as they call them, that chymists are wont to obtain from compound bodies by the fire, may possibly in many cases be the productions of it; since if the same bodies had been wrought upon by the agents employ'd by _helmont_, they would have yielded neither sulphur nor mercury; and those portions of them which the fire would have presented us in the forme of sulphureous and mercurial bodies would have, by _helmonts_ method, been exhibited to us in the form of salt. but though (sayes _eleutherius_) you have alledg'd very plausible arguments against the _tria prima_, yet i see not how it will be possible for you to avoid acknowledging that earth and water are elementary ingredients, though not of mineral concretes, yet of all animal and vegetable bodies; since if any of these of what sort soever be committed to distillation, there is regularly and constantly separated from it a phlegme or aqueous part and a _caput mortuum_ or earth. i readily acknowledged (answers _carneades_) it is not so easy to reject water and earth (and especially the former) as 'tis to reject the _tria prima_, from being the elements of mixt bodies; but 'tis not every difficult thing that is impossible. i consider then, as to water, that the chief qualities which make men give that name to any visible substance, are, that it is fluid or liquid, and that it is insipid and inodorous. now as for the tast of these qualities, i think you have never seen any of those separated substances that the chymists call phlegme which was perfectly devoyd both of tast and smell: and if you object, that yet it may be reasonably suppos'd, that since the whole body is liquid, the mass is nothing but elementary water faintly imbu'd with some of the saline or sulphureous parts of the same concrete, which it retain'd with it upon its separation from the other ingredients. to this i answer, that this objection would not appear so stong [transcriber's note: strong] as it is plausible, if chymists understood the nature of fluidity and compactnesse; and that, as i formerly observ'd, to a bodies being fluid there is nothing necessary, but that it be divided into parts small enough; and that these parts be put into such a motion among themselves as to glide some this way and some that way, along each others surfaces. so that, although a concrete were never so dry, and had not any water or other liquor in-existent in it, yet such a comminution of its parts may be made, by the fire or other agents, as to turn a great portion of them into liquor. of this truth i will give an instance, employ'd by our friend here present as one of the most conducive of his experiments to illustrate the nature of salts. if you take, then, sea salt and melt it in the fire to free it from the aqueous parts, and afterward distill it with a vehement fire from burnt clay, or any other, as dry a _caput mortuum_ as you please, you will, as chymists confess, [errata: confesse (delete comma)] by teaching it drive over a good part of the salt in the form of a liquor. and to satisfy some ingenious men, that a great part of this liquor was still true sea salt brought by the operation of the fire into corpuscles so small, and perhaps so advantageously shap'd, as to be capable of the forme of a fluid body, he did in my presence poure to such spiritual salts a due proportion of the spirit (or salt and phlegme) of urine, whereby having evaporated the superfluous moisture, he soon obtain'd such another concrete, both as to tast and smell, and easie sublimableness as common salt _armoniack_, which you know is made up of grosse and undistill'd sea salt united with the salts of urine and of soot, which two are very neer of kin to each other. and further, to manifest that the corpuscles of sea salt and the saline ones of urine retain their several natures in this concrete, he mixt it with a convenient quantity of salt of tartar, and committing it to distillation soon regain'd his spirit of urine in a liquid form by its self, the sea salt staying behind with the salt of tartar. wherefore it is very possible that dry bodies may by the fire be reduc'd to liquors without any separation of elements, but barely by a certain kind of dissipation and comminution of the matter, whereby its parts are brought into a new state. and if it be still objected, that the phlegme of mixt bodies must be reputed water, because so weak a tast needs but a very small proportion of salt to impart it; it may be reply'd, that for ought appears, common salt and divers other bodies, though they be distill'd never so dry, and in never so close vessels, will yield each of them pretty store of a liquor, wherein though (as i lately noted) saline corpuscles abound, yet there is besides a large proportion of phlegme, as may easily be discovered by coagulating the saline corpuscles with any convenient body; as i lately told you, our friend coagulated part of the spirit of salt with spirit of urine: and as i have divers times separated a salt from oyle of vitriol it self (though a very ponderous liquor and drawn from a saline body) by boyling it with a just quantity of mercury, and then washing the newly coagulated salt from the precipitate with fair water. now to what can we more probably ascribe this plenty of aqueous substance afforded us by the distillation of such bodies, than unto this, that among the various operations of the fire upon the matter of a concrete, divers particles of that matter are reduc'd to such a shape and bignesse as is requisite to compose such a liquor as chymists are wont to call phlegme or water. how i conjecture this change may be effected, 'tis neither necessary for me to tell you, nor possible to do so without a much longer discourse then were now seasonable. but i desire you would with me reflect upon what i formerly told you concerning the change of quicksilver into water; for that water having but a very faint tast, if any whit more than divers of those liquors that chymists referr to phlegme; by that experiment it seems evident, that even a metalline body, and therefore much more such as are but vegetable or animal, may by a simple operation of the fire be turn'd in great part into water. and since those i dispute with are not yet able out of gold, or silver, or divers other concretes to separate any thing like water; i hope i may be allow'd to conclude against them, that water it self is not an universal and pre-existent ingredient of mixt bodies. but as for those chymists that, supposing with me the truth of what _helmont_ relates of the _alkahest's_ wonderful effects, have a right to press me with his authority concerning them, and to alledge that he could transmute all reputedly mixt bodies into insipid and meer water; to those i shall represent, that though his affirmations conclude strongly against the vulgar chymists (against whom i have not therefore scrupl'd to employ them) since they evince that the commonly reputed principles or ingredients of things are not permanent and indestructible, since they may be further reduc'd into insipid phlegme differing from them all; yet till we can be allow'd to examine this liquor, i think it not unreasonable to doubt whether it be not something else then meer water. for i find not any other reason given by _helmont_ of his pronouncing it so, then that it is insipid. now sapour being an accident or an affection of matter that relates to our tongue, palate, and other organs of tast, it may very possibly be, that the small parts of a body may be of such a size and shape, as either by their extream littleness, or by their slenderness, or by their figure, to be unable to pierce into and make a perceptible impression upon the nerves or membranous parts of the organs of tast, and what [errata: yet] may be fit to work otherwise upon divers other bodies than meer water can, and consequently to disclose it self to be of a nature farr enough from elementary. in silke dyed red or of any other colour, whilst many contiguous threads makes up a skein, the colour of the silke is conspicuous; but if only a very few of them be lookt upon, the colour will appear much fainter then before. but if you take out one simple thread, you shall not easily be able to discern any colour at all; so subtile an object having not the force to make upon the optick nerve an impression great enough to be taken notice of. it is also observ'd, that the best sort of oyl-olive is almost tastless, and yet i need not tell you how exceedingly distant in nature oyle is from water. the liquor into which i told you, upon the relation of _lully_, and [errata: an] eye-witness that mercury might be transmuted, has sometimes but a very languid, if any tast, and yet its operations even upon some mineral bodies are very peculiar. quicksilver it self also, though the corpuscles it consists of be so very small as to get into the pores of that closest and compactest of bodies, gold, is yet (you know) altogether tastless. and our _helmont_ several times tells us, that fair water wherein a little quantity f [errata: of] quicksilver has lain for some time, though it acquire no certain tast or other sensible quality from the quicksilver; yet it has a power to destroy wormes in humane bodies; which he does much, but not causelessly extoll. and i remember, a great lady, that had been eminent for her beauty in divers courts, confess'd to me, that this insipid liquor was of all innocent washes for the face the best that she ever met with. and here let me conclude my discourse, concerning such waters or liquors as i have hitherto been examining, with these two considerations. whereof the first is, that by reason of our being wont to drink nothing but wine, bear, cyder, or other strongly tasted liquors, there may be in several of these liquors, that are wont to pass for insipid phlegme, very peculiar and distinct, tasts [errata: distinct tasts] though unheeded (and perhaps not to be perceiv'd) by us. for to omit what naturalists affirm of apes, (and which probably may be true of divers other animals) that they have a more exquisite palate than men: among men themselves, those that are wont to drink nothing but water may (as i have try'd in my self) discern very sensibly a great difference of tasts in several waters, which one un-accustomed to drink water would take to be all alike insipid. and this is the _first_ of my two considerations; the _other_ is, that it is not impossible that the corpuscles into which a body is dissipated by the fire may by the operation of the same fire have their figures so altered, or may be by associations with one another brought into little masses of such a size and shape, as not to be fit to make sensible impressions on the tongue. and that you may not think such alterations impossible, be pleased to consider with me, that not only the sharpest spirit of vinager having dissolved as much corall as it can, will coagulate with it into a substance, which though soluble in water, like salt, is incomparably less strongly tasted then the vinager was before; but (what is more considerable) though the acid salts that are carried up with quicksilver in the preparation of common sublimate are so sharp, that being moistened with water it will corrode some of the metals themselves; yet this corrosive sublimate being twice or thrice re-sublim'd with a full proportion of insipid quicksilver, constitutes (as you know) that factitious concrete, which the chymists call _mercurius dulcis_; not because it is sweet, but because the sharpness of the corrosive salts is so taken away by their combination with the mercurial corpuscles, that the whole mixture when it is prepar'd is judg'd to be insipid. and thus (continues _carneades_) having given you some reasons why i refuse to admit elementary water for a constant ingredient of mixt bodies, it will be easie for me to give you an account why i also reject earth. for first, it may well be suspected that many substances pass among chymists under the name of earth, because, like it, they are dry, and heavy, and fixt, which yet are very farr from an elementary nature. this you will not think improbable, if you recall to mind what i formerly told you concerning what chymists call the dead earth of things, and especially touching the copper to be drawn from the _caput mortuum_ of vitriol; and if also you allow me to subjoyn a casual but memorable experiment made by _johannes agricola_ upon the _terra damnata_ of brimstone. our author then tells us (in his notes upon _popius_ [transcriber's note: poppius],) that in the year he made an oyle of sulphur; the remaining _fæces_ he reverberated in a moderate fire fourteen dayes; afterwards he put them well luted up in a wind oven, and gave them a strong fire for six hours, purposing to calcine the _fæces_ to a perfect whiteness, that he might make someting [transcriber's note: something] else out of them. but coming to break the pot, he found above but very little _fæces_, and those grey and not white; but beneath there lay a fine red _regulus_ which he first marvell'd at and knew not what to make of, being well assured that not the least thing, besides the _fæces_ of the sulphur, came into the pot; and that the sulphur it self had only been dissolv'd in linseed oyle; this _regulus_ he found heavy and malleable almost as lead; having caus'd a goldsmith to draw him a wire of it, he found it to be of the fairest copper, and so rightly colour'd, that a jew of _prague_ offer'd him a great price for it. and of this metal he sayes he had _loth_ (or six ounces) out of one pound of ashes or _fæces_. and this story may well incline us to suspect that since the _caput mortuum_ of the sulphur was kept so long in the fire before it was found to be any thing else then a _terra damnata_, there may be divers other residences of bodies which are wont to pass only for the terrestrial _fæces_ of things, and therefore to be thrown away as soon as the distillation or calcination of the body that yielded them is ended; which yet if they were long and skilfully examin'd by the fire would appear to be differing from elementary earth. and i have taken notice of the unwarrantable forwardness of common chymists to pronounce things useless _fæces_, by observing how often they reject the _caput mortuum_ of verdegrease; which is yet so farr from deserving that name, that not only by strong fires and convenient additaments it may in some hours be reduc'd into copper, but with a certain flux powder i sometimes make for recreation, i have in two or three minutes obtain'd that metal from it. to which i may add, that having for tryall sake kept venetian taclk [errata: talck] in no less a heat than that of a glass furnace, i found after all the brunt of the fire it had indur'd, the remaining body though brittle and discolour'd, had not lost very much of its former bulke, and seem'd still to be nearer of kin to talck than to meer earth. and i remember too, that a candid mineralist, famous for his skill in trying of oars, requesting me one day to procure him a certain _american_ mineral earth of a _virtuoso_, who he thought would not refuse me; i enquir'd of him why he seem'd so greedy of it: he confess'd to me that this gentleman having brought that earth to the publick say-masters; and they upon their being unable by any means to bring it to fusion or make it fly away, he (the relator) had procur'd a little of it; and having try'd it with a peculiar flux separated from it neer a third part of pure gold; so great mistakes may be committed in hastily concluding things to be uselesse earth. next, it may be suppos'd, that as in the resolution of bodies by the fire some of the dissipated parts may, by their various occursion occasion'd by the heat, be brought to stick together so closely as to constitute corpuscles too heavy for the fire to carry away; the aggregate of which corpuscles is wont to be call'd ashes or earrh [errata: earth]; so other agents may resolve the concrete into minute parts, after so differing a manner as not to produce any _caput mortuum_, or dry and heavy body. as you may remember _helmont_ above inform'd us, that with his great dissolvent he divided a coal into two liquid and volatile bodies, æquiponderant to the coal, without any dry or fixt residence at all. and indeed, i see not why it should be necessary that all agents that resolve bodies into portions of differingly qualifi'd matter must work on them the same way, and divide them into just such parts, both for nature and number, as the fire dissipates them into. for since, as i noted before, the bulk and shape of the small parts of bodies, together with their fitness and unfitness to be easily put into motion, may make the liquors or other substances such corpuscles compose, as much to differ from each other as do some of the chymical principles: why may not something happen in this case, not unlike what is usuall in the grosser divisions of bodies by mechanical instruments? where we see that some tools reduce wood, for instance, into darts [errata: parts] of several shapes, bignesse, and other qualities, as hatchets and wedges divide it into grosser parts; some more long and slender, as splinters; and some more thick and irregular, as chips; but all of considerable bulk; but files and saws makes a comminution of it into dust; which, as all the others, is of the more solid sort of parts; whereas others divide it into long and broad, but thin and flexible parts, as do _planes_: and of this kind of parts it self there is also a variety according to the difference of the tools employ'd to work on the wood; the shavings made by the _plane_ being in some things differing from those shives or thin and flexible pieces of wood that are obtain'd by _borers_, and these from some others obtainable by other tools. some chymical examples applicable to this purpose i have elsewhere given you. to which i may add, that whereas in a mixture of sulphur and salt of tartar well melted and incorporated together, the action of pure spirit of wine digested on it is to separate the sulphureous from the alcalizate parts, by dissolving the former and leaving the latter, the action of wine (probably upon the score of its copious phlegme) upon the same mixture is to divide it into corpuscles consisting of both alcalizate and sulphureous parts united. and if it be objected, that this is but a factitious concrete; i answer, that however the instance may serve to illustrate what i propos'd, if not to prove it; and that nature her self doth in the bowels of the earth make decompounded bodies, as we see in vitriol, cinnaber, and even in sulphur it self; i will not urge that the fire divides new milk into five differing substances; but runnet and acid liquors divide it into a coagulated matter and a thin whey: and on the other side churning divides it into butter and butter-milk, which may either of them be yet reduc'd to other substances differing from the former. i will not presse this, i say, nor other instances of this nature, because i cannot in few words answer what may be objected, that these concretes sequestred without the help of the fire may by it be further divided into hypostatical principles. but i will rather represent, that whereas the same spirit of wine will dissociare [transcriber's note: dissociate] the parts of camphire, and make them one liquor with it self; _aqua fortis_ will also disjoyn them, and put them into motion; but so as to keep them together, and yet alter their texture into the form of an oyle. i know also an uncompounded liquor, that an extraordinary chymist would not allow to be so much as saline, which doth (as i have try'd) from coral it self (as fixt as divers judicious writers assert that concrete to be) not only obtain a noble tincture, without the intervention of nitre or other salts; but will carry over the tincture in distillation. and if some reasons did not forbid me, i could now tell you of a _menstruum_ i make my self, that doth more odly dissociate the parts of minerals very fixt in the fire. so that it seems not incredible, that there may be some agent or way of operation found, whereby this or that concrete, if not all firme bodies, may be resolv'd into parts so very minute and so unapt to stick close to one another, that none of them may be fixt enough to stay behind in a strong fire, and to be incapable of distillation; nor consequently to be look'd upon as earth. but to return to _helmont_, the same authour somewhere supply's me with another argument against the earth's being such an element as my adversaries would have it. for he somewhere affirms, that he can reduce all the terrestrial parts of mixt bodies into insipid water; whence we may argue against the earths being one of their elements, even from that notion of elements which you may remember _philoponus_ recited out of _aristotle_ himself, when he lately disputed for his chymists against _themistius_. and here we may on this occasion consider, that since a body from which the fire hath driven away its looser parts is wont to be look'd upon as earth, upon the account of its being endow'd with both these qualities, tastlessenesse and fixtnesse, (for salt of tartar though fixt passes not among the chymists for earth, because 'tis strongly tasted) if it be in the power of natural agents to deprive the _caput mortuum_ of a body of either of those two qualities, or to give them both to a portion of matter that had them not both before, the chymists will not easily define what part of a resolv'd concrete is earth, and make out, that that earth is a primary, simple, and indestructible body. now there are some cases wherein the more skilful of the vulgar chymists themselves pretend to be able, by repeated cohobations and other fit operations, to make the distilled parts of a concrete bring its own _caput mortuum_ over the helme, in the forme of a liquor; in which state being both fluid and volatile, you will easily believe it would not be taken for earth. and indeed by a skilful, but not vulgar, way of managing some concretes, there may be more effected in this kind, then you perhaps would easily think. and on the other side, that either earth may be generated, or at least bodies that did not before appear to be neer totally earth, may be so alter'd as to pass for it, seems very possible, if _helmont_[ ] have done that by art which he mentions in several places; especially where he sayes that he knowes wayes whereby sulphur once dissolv'd is all of it fix'd into a terrestrial powder; and the whole bodie of salt-petre may be turn'd into earth: which last he elsewhere sayes is done by the odour only of a certain sulphureous fire. and in another place he mentions one way of doing this, which i cannot give you an account of; because the materialls i had prepar'd for trying it, were by a servants mistake unhappily thrown away. [footnote : _novi item modos quibus totum salpetiæ [errata: sal-petræ] in terram convertitur, totumque sulphur semel dissolutum fixetur in pulvearem terreum. helmont in compl. atque mist. elementor. sect. ._] and these last arguments may be confirm'd by the experiment i have often had occasion to mention concerning the mint i produc'd out of water. and partly by an observation of _rondeletius_ concerning the growth of animals also, nourish'd but by water, which i remember'd not to mention, when i discours'd to you about the production of things out of water. this diligent writer then in his instructive book of fishes,[ ] affirmes that his wife kept a fish in a glass of water without any other food for three years; in which space it was constantly augmented, till at last it could not come out of the place at which it was put in, and at length was too big for the glass it self though that were of a large capacity. and because there is no just reason to doubt, that this fish, if distill'd, would have yielded the like differing substances with other animals: and however, because the mint which i had out of water afforded me upon distillation a good quantity of charcoal, i think i may from thence inferr, that earth it self may be produc'd out of water; or if you please, that water may be transmuted into earth; and consequently, that though it could be prov'd that earth is an ingredient actually in-existent in the vegetable and animal bodies whence it may be obtain'd by fire: yet it would not necessarily follow, that earth as a pre-existent element does with other principles convene to make up those bodies whence it seems to have been separated. [footnote : _lib. . cap. ._] after all is said (sayes _eleutherius_) i have yet something to object, that i cannot but think considerable, since _carneades_ himself alledg'd it as such; for, (continues _eleutherius_ smiling) i must make bold to try whether you can as luckily answer your own arguments, as those of your antagonists, i mean (pursues he) that part of your concessions, wherein you cannot but remember that you supply'd your adversaries with an example to prove that there may be elementary bodies, by taking notice that gold may be an ingredient in a multitude of differing mixtures, and yet retain its nature, notwithstanding all that the chymists by their fires and corrosive waters are able to do to destroy it. i sufficiently intimated to you at that time (replies _carneades_) that i propos'd this example, chiefly to shew you how nature may be conceived to have made elements, not to prove that she actually has made any; and you know, that _a posse ad esse_ the inference will not hold. but (continues _carneades_) to answer more directly to the objection drawn from gold, i must tell you, that though i know very well that divers of the more sober chymists have complain'd of the vulgar chymists, as of mountebanks or cheats, for pretending so vainly, as hitherto they have done, to destroy gold; yet i know a certain _menstruum_ (which our friend has made, and intends shortly to communicate to the ingenious) of so piercing and powerfull a quality, that if notwithstanding much care, and some skill, i did not much deceive myself, i have with it really destroy'd even refin'd gold, and brought it into a metalline body of another colour and nature, as i found by tryals purposely made. and if some just considerations did not for the present forbid it, i could perchance here shew you by another experiment or two of my own trying, that such _menstruums_ may be made as to entice away and retain divers parts, from bodies, which even the more judicious and experienc'd _spagyrists_ have pronounc'd irresoluble by the fire. though (which i desire you would mark) in neither of these instances, the gold or precious stones be analys'd into any of the _tria prima_, but only reduc'd to new concretes. and indeed there is a great disparity betwixt the operations of the several agents whereby the parts of a body come to be dissipated. as if (for instance) you dissolve the purer sort of vitriol in common water, the liquor will swallow up the mineral, and so dissociate its corpuscles, that they will seem to make up but one liquor with those of the water; and yet each of these corpuscles retains its nature and texture, and remains a vitriolate and compounded body. but if the same vitriol be exposed to a strong fire, it will then be divided not only, as before, into smaller parts, but into heterogeneous substances, each of the vitriolate corpuscles that remain'd entire in the water, being it self upon the destruction of its former texture dissipated or divided into new particles of differing qualities. but instances more fitly applicable to this purpose, i have already given you. wherefore to return to what i told you about the destruction of gold, that experiment invites me to represent to you, that though there were either saline, or sulphureous, or terrestrial portions of matter, whose parts were so small, so firmly united together, or of a figure so fit to make them cohere to one another, (as we see that in quicksilver broken into little globes, the parts brought to touch one another do immediately re-imbody) that neither the fire, nor the usual agents employ'd by chymists, are pierceing enough to divide their parts, so as to destroy the texture of the single corpuscles; yet it would not necessarily follow, that such permanent bodies were elementary, since tis possible there may be agents found in nature, some of whose parts may be of such a size and figure as to take better hold of some parts of these seemingly elementary corpuscles than these parts do of the rest, and consequently may carry away such parts with them, and so dissolve the texture of the corpuscle by pulling its parts asunder. and if it be said, that at least we may this way discover the elementary ingredients of things, by observing into what substances these corpuscles that were reputed pure are divided; i answer, that it is not necessary that such a discovery should be practicable. for if the particles of the dissolvent do take such firme hold of those of the dissolved body, they must constitute together new bodies, as well as destroy the old; and the strickt union, which according to this _hypothesis_ may well be suppos'd betwixt the parts of the emergent body, will make it as little to be expected that they should be pull'd asunder, but by little parts of matter, that to divide them associate themselves and stick extreamly close to those of them which they sever from their former adherents. besides that it is not impossible, that a corpuscle suppos'd to be elementary may have its nature changed, without suffering a divorce of its parts, barely by a new texture effected by some powerfull agent; as i formerly told you, the same portion of matter may easily by the operation of the fire be turn'd at pleasure into the form of a brittle and transparent, or an opacous and malleable body. and indeed, if you consider how farr the bare change of texture, whether made by art or nature (or rather by nature with or without the assistance of man) can go in producing such new qualities in the same parcel of matter, and how many inanimate bodies (such as are all the chymical productions of the fire) we know are denominated and distinguish'd not so much by any imaginary substantial form, as by the aggregate of these qualities. if you consider these things, i say, and that the varying of either the figure, or the size, or the motion, or the situation, or connexion of the corpuscles whereof any of these bodies is compos'd, may alter the fabrick of it, you will possibly be invited to suspect, with me, that there is no great need that nature should alwayes have elements before hand, whereof to make such bodies as we call mixts. and that it is not so easie as chymists and others have hitherto imagin'd, to discern, among the many differing substances that may without any extraordinary skill be obtain'd from the same portion of matter, which ought to be esteemed exclusively to all the rest, its in-existent elementary ingredients; much lesse to determine what primogeneal and simple bodies convened together to compose it. to exemplify this, i shall add to what i have already on several occasions represented, but this single instance. you may remember (_eleutherius_) that i formerly intimated to you, that besides mint and pompions, i produced divers other vegetables of very differing natures out of water. wherefore you will not, i presume, think it incongruous to suppose, that when a slender vine-slip is set into the ground, and takes root, there it may likewise receive its nutriment from the water attracted out of the earth by his roots, or impell'd by the warm'th of the sun, or pressure of the ambient air into the pores of them. and this you will the more easily believe, if you ever observ'd what a strange quantity of water will drop out of a wound given to the vine, in a convenient place, at a seasonable time in the spring; and how little of tast or smell this _aqua vitis_, as physitians call it, is endow'd with, notwithstanding what concoction or alteration it may receive in its passage through the vine, to discriminate it from common water. supposing then this liquor, at its first entrance into the roots of the vine, to be common water; let us a little consider how many various substances may be obtain'd from it; though to do so, i must repeat somewhat that i had a former occasion to touch upon. and first, this liquor being digested in the plant, and assimilated by the several parts of it, is turn'd into the wood, bark, pith, leaves, &c. of the vine; the same liquor may be further dry'd, and fashon'd into vine-buds, and these a while after are advanced unto sour grapes, which express'd yield verjuice, a liquor very differing in several qualities both from wine and other liquors obtainable from the vine: these soure grapes being by the heat of the sun concocted and ripened, turne to well tasted grapes; these if dry'd in the sun and distill'd, afford a fætid oyle and a piercing _empyreumatical_ spirit, but not a vinous spirit; these dry'd grapes or raisins boyl'd in a convenient proportion of water make a sweet liquor, which being betimes distill'd afford an oyle and spirit much like those of the raisins themselves; if the juice of the grapes be squeez'd out and put to ferment, it first becomes a sweet and turbid liquor, then grows lesse sweet and more clear, and then affords in common distillations not an oyle but a spirit, which, though inflamable like oyle, differs much from it, in that it is not fat, and that it will readily mingle with water. i have likewise without addition obtain'd in processe of time (and by an easie way which i am ready to teach you) from one of the noblest sorts of wine, pretty store of pure and curiously figured crystals of salt, together with a great proportion of a liquor as sweet almost as hony; and these i obtained not from must, but true and sprightly wine; besides the vinous liquor, the fermented juice of grapes is partly turned into liquid dregs or leeze, and partly into that crust or dry feculancy that is commonly called tartar; and this tartar may by the fire be easily divided into five differing substances; four of which are not acid, and the other not so manifestly acid as the tartar it self; the same vinous juice after some time, especially if it be not carefully kept, degenerates into that very sour liquor called vinegar; from which you may obtain by the fire a spirit and a crystalline salt differing enough from the spirit and lixiviate salt of tartar. and if you pour the dephlegm'd spirit of the vinegar upon the salt of tartar, there will be produc'd such a conflict or ebullition as if there were scarce two more contrary bodies in nature; and oftentimes in this vinager you may observe part of the matter to be turned into an innumerable company of swimming animals, which our friend having divers years ago observed, hath in one of his papers taught us how to discover clearly without the help of a _microscope_. into all these various schemes of matter, or differingly qualifyed bodies, besides divers others that i purposely forbear to mention, may the water that is imbib'd by the roots of the vine be brought, partly by the formative power of the plant, and partly by supervenient agents or causes, without the visible concurrence of any extraneous ingredient; but if we be allowed to add to the productions of this transmuted water a few other substances, we may much encrease the variety of such bodies; although in this second sort of productions, the vinous parts seem scarce to retain any thing of the much more fix'd bodies wherewith they were mingl'd; but only to have by their mixture with them acquir'd such a disposition, that in their recess occasion'd by the fire they came to be alter'd as to shape, or bigness, or both, and associated after a new manner. thus, as i formerly told you, i did by the addition of a _caput mortuum_ of antimony, and some other bodies unfit for distillation, obtain from crude tartar, store of a very volatile and crystalline salt, differing very much in smell and other qualities from the usuall salts of tartar. but (sayes _eleutherius_, interrupting him at these words) if you have no restraint upon you, i would very gladly before you go any further, be more particularly inform'd, how you make this volatile salt, because (you know) that such multitudes of chymists have by a scarce imaginable variety of wayes, attempted in vain the volatilization of the salt of tartar, that divers learned _spagyrists_ speak as if it were impossible, to make any thing out of tartar, that shall be volatile in a saline forme, or as some of them express it, _in forma sicca_. i am very farr from thinking (answers _carneades_) that the salt i have mention'd is that which _paracelsus_ and _helmont_ mean when they speak of _sal tartari volatile_, and ascribe such great things to it. for the salt i speak of falls extreamly short of those virtues, not seeming in its tast, smel, and other obvious qualities, to differ very much (though something it do differ) from salt of harts-horn, and other volatile salts drawn from the distill'd parts of animals. nor have i yet made tryals enough to be sure, that it is a pure salt of tartar without participating any thing at all of the nitre, or antimony. but because it seems more likely to proceed from the tartar, than from any of the other ingredients, and because the experiment is in it self not ignoble, and luciferous enough (as shewing a new way to produce a volatile salt contrary to acid salts from bodies that otherwise are observ'd to yield no such liquor, but either only, or chiefly, acid ones,) i shall, to satisfie you, acquaint you before any of my other friends with the way i now use (for i have formerly us'd some others) to make it. take then of good antimony, salt-petre and tartar, of each an equal weight, and of quicklime halfe the weight of any one of them; let these be powder'd and well mingl'd; this done, you must have in readiness a long neck or retort of earth, which must be plac'd in a furnace for a naked fire, and have at the top of it a hole of a convenient bigness, at which you may cast in the mixture, and presently stop it up again; this vessel being fitted with a large receiver must have fire made under it, till the bottom of the sides be red hot, and then you must cast in the above prepar'd mixture, by about halfe a spoonfull (more or less) at a time, at the hole made for that purpose; which being nimbly stopt, the fumes will pass into the receiver and condense there into a liquor, that being rectifi'd will be of a pure golden colour, and carry up that colour to a great height; this spirit abounds in the salt i told you of, part of which may easily enough be separated by the way i use in such cases, which is, to put the liquor into a glass egg, or bolthead with a long and narrow neck. for if this be plac'd a little inclining in hot sand, there will sublime up a fine salt, which, as i told you, i find to be much of kin to the volatile salts of animals: for like them it has a saltish, not an acid salt; it hisses upon the affusion of spirit of nitre, or oyle of vitriol; it precipitates corals dissolv'd in spirit of vinager; it turnes the blew syrup of violets immediately green; it presently turnes the solution of sublimate into a milkie whiteness; and in summ, has divers operations like those that i have observ'd in that sort of salts to which i have resembled it: and is so volatile, that for distinction sake, i call it _tartari fugitivus_ [errata: sal tartari fugitivus]. what virtues it may have in physick i have not yet had the opportunity to try; but i am apt to think they will not be despicable. and besides that a very ingenious friend of mine tells me he hath done great matters against the stone, with a preparation not very much differing from ours, a very experienc'd germane chymist finding that i was unacquainted with the wayes of making this salt, told me that in a great city in his country, a noted chymist prizes it so highly, that he had a while since procur'd a priviledge from the magistrates, that none but he, or by his licence, should vent a spirit made almost after the same way with mine, save that he leaves out one of the ingredients, namely the quick-lime. but, continues _carneades_, to resume my former discourse where your curiosity interrupted it; tis also a common practice in _france_ to bury thin plates of copper in the marc (as the french call it) or husks of grapes, whence the juice has been squeez'd out in the wine-press, and by this means the more saline parts of those husks working by little and little upon the copper, coagulate themselves with it into that blewish green substance we in english call verdigrease. of which i therefore take notice, because having distill'd it in a naked fire, i found as i expected, that by the association of the saline with the metalline parts, the former were so alter'd, that the distill'd liquor, even without rectification, seem'd by smell and tast, strong almost like _aqua fortis_, and very much surpassed the purest and most rectifi'd spirit of vinager that ever i made. and this spirit i therefore ascribe to the salt of the husks alter'd by their co-mixture with the copper (though the fire afterwards divorce and transmute them) because i found this later in the bottom of the retort in the forme of a _crocus_ or redish powder: and because copper is of too sluggish a nature to be forc'd over in close vessels by no stronger a heat. and that which is also somewhat remarkable in the destillation of good verdigrease, (or at least of that sort that i us'd) is this, that i never could observe that it yielded me any oyl, (unless a little black slime which was separated in rectification may pass for oyle) though both tartar and vinager, (especially the former) will by destillation yield a moderate proportion of it. if likewise you pour spirit of vinager upon calcin'd lead, the acid salt of the liquor will by its commixture with the metalline parts, though insipid, acquire in a few hours a more than saccharine sweetness; and these saline parts being by a strong fire destill'd from the lead wherewith they were imbody'd, will, as i formerly also noted to a different purpose, leave the metal behind them alter'd in some qualities from what it was, and will themselves ascend, partly in the forme of an unctuous body or oyle, partly in that of phlegme; but for the greatest part in the forme of a subtile spirit, indow'd, besides divers new qualities which i am not now willing to take notice of, with a strong smell very much other than that of vinager, and a piercing tast quite differing both from the sowerness of the spirit of vinager, and the sweetness of the sugar of lead. to be short, as the difference of bodies may depend meerly upon that of the schemes whereinto their common matter is put; so the seeds of things, the fire and the other agents are able to alter the minute parts of a body (either by breaking them into smaller ones of differing shapes, or by uniting together these fragments with the unbroken corpuscles, or such corpuscles among themselves) and the same agents partly by altering the shape or bigness of the constituent corpuscles of a body, partly by driving away some of them, partly by blending others with them, and partly by some new manner of connecting them, may give the whole portion of matter a new texture of its minute parts; and thereby make it deserve a new and distinct name. so that according as the small parts of matter recede from each other, or work upon each other, or are connected together after this or that determinate manner, a body of this or that denomination is produced, as some other body happens thereby to be alter'd or destroy'd. since then those things which chymists produce by the help of the fire are but inanimate bodies; since such fruits of the chymists skill differ from one another but in so few qualities that we see plainly that by fire and other agents we can employ, we can easily enough work as great alterations upon matter, as those that are requisite to change one of these chymical productions into another; since the same portion of matter may without being compounded with any extraneous body, or at least element, be made to put on such a variety of formes, and consequently to be (successively) turn'd into so many differing bodies. and since the matter cloath'd with so many differing formes was originally but water, and that in its passage thorow so many transformations, it was never reduc'd into any of those substances which are reputed to be the principles or elements of mixt bodies, except by the violence of the fire, which it self divides not bodies into perfectly simple or elementary substances, but into new compounds; since, i say, these things are so, i see not why we must needs believe that there are any primogeneal and simple bodies, of which as of pre-exsistent elements nature is obliged to compound all others. nor do i see why we may not conceive that she may produce the bodies accounted mixt out of one another by variously altering and contriving their minute parts, without resolving the matter into any such simple or homogeneous substances as are pretended. neither, to dispatch, do i see why it should be counted absur'd [transcriber's note: absurd] to think, that when a body is resolv'd by the fire into its suppos'd simple ingredients, those substances are not true and proper elements, but rather were, as it were, accidentally produc'd by the fire, which by dissipating a body into minute parts does, if those parts be shut up in close vessels, for the most part necessarily bring them to associate themselves after another manner than before, and so bring them into bodies of such different consistences as the former texture of the body, and concurrent circumstances make such disbanded particles apt to constitute; as experience shews us (and i have both noted it, and prov'd it already) that as there are some concretes whose parts when dissipated by fire are fitted to be put into such schemes of matter as we call oyle, and salt, and spirit; so there are others, such as are especially the greatest part of minerals, whose corpuscles being of another size or figure, or perhaps contriv'd another way, will not in the fire yield bodies of the like consistences, but rather others of differing textures; not to mention, that from gold and some other bodies, we see not that the fire separates any distinct substances at all; nor that even those similar parts of bodies which the chymists obtain by the fire, are the elements whose names they bear, but compound bodies, upon which, for their resemblance to them in consistence, or some other obvious quality, chymists have been pleas'd to bestow such appellations. the conclusion. these last words of _carneades_ being soon after follow'd by a noise which seem'd to come from the place where the rest of the company was, he took it for a warning, that it was time for him to conclude or break off his discourse; and told his friend; by this time i hope you see, _eleutherius_, that if _helmonts_ experiments be true, it is no absurdity to question whether that doctrine be one, that doth not assert any elements in the sence before explain'd. but because that, as divers of my arguments suppose the marvellous power of the _alkahest_ in the analyzing of bodies, so the effects ascrib'd to that power are so unparallell'd and stupendious, that though i am not sure but that there _may be_ such an agent, yet little less than [greek: autopsia] seems requisite to make a man sure there _is_. and consequently i leave it to you to judge, how farre those of my arguments that are built upon _alkahestical_ operations are weakned by that liquors being matchless; and shall therefore desire you not to think that i propose this paradox that rejects all elements, as an opinion equally probable with the former part of my discourse. for by that, i hope, you are satisfied, that the arguments wont to be brought by chymists, to prove that all bodies consist of either three principles, or five, are far from being so strong as those that i have employ'd to prove, that there is not any certain and determinate number of such principles or elements to be met with universally in all mixt bodies. and i suppose i need not tell you, that these _anti-chymical_ paradoxes might have been manag'd more to their advantage; but that having not confin'd my curiosity to chymical experiments, i who am but a young man, and younger chymist, can yet be but slenderly furnished with them, in reference to so great and difficult a task as you impos'd upon me; besides that, to tell you the truth, i durst not employ some even of the best experiments i am acquainted with, because i must not yet disclose them; but however, i think i may presume that what i have hitherto discoursed will induce you to think, that chymists have been much more happy in finding experiments than the causes of them; or in assigning the principles by which they may best be explain'd. and indeed, when in the writings of _paracelsus_ i meet with such phantastick and un-intelligible discourses as that writer often puzzels and tyres his reader with, father'd upon such excellent experiments, as though he seldom clearly teaches, i often find he knew; me thinks the chymists, in their searches after truth, are not unlike the navigators of _solomons tarshish_ fleet, who brought home from their long and tedious voyages, not only gold, and silver, and ivory, but apes and peacocks too; for so the writings of several (for i say not, all) of your hermetick philosophers present us, together with divers substantial and noble experiments, theories, which either like peacocks feathers make a great shew, but are neither solid nor useful; or else like apes, if they have some appearance of being rational, are blemish'd with some absurdity or other, that when they are _attentively_ consider'd, makes them appear ridiculous. _carneades_ having thus finish'd his discourse against the received doctrines of the _elements_; _eleutherius_ judging he should not have time to say much to him before their separation, made some haste to tell him; i confess, _carneades_, that you have said more in favour of your paradoxes then i expected. for though divers of the experiments you have mention'd are no secrets, and were not unknown to me, yet besides that you have added many of your own unto them, you have laid them together in such a way, and apply'd them to such purposes, and made such deductions from them, as i have not hitherto met with. but though i be therefore inclin'd to think, that _philoponus_, had he heard you, would scarce have been able in all points to defend the chymical _hypothesis_ against the arguments wherewith you have oppos'd it; yet me thinks that however your objections seem to evince a great part of what they pretend to, yet they evince it not all; and the numerous tryals of those you call the vulgar chymists, may be allow'd to prove something too. wherefore, if it be granted you that you have made it probable, first, that the differing substances into which mixt bodies are wont to be resolved by the fire are not of a pure and an elementary nature, especially for this reason, that they yet retain so much of the nature of the concrete that afforded them, as to appear to be yet somewhat compounded, and oftentimes to differ in one concrete from principles of the same denomination in another: next, that as to the number of these differing substances, neither is it precisely three, because in most vegetable and animal bodies earth and phlegme are also to be found among their ingredients; nor is there any one determinate number into which the fire (as it is wont to be employ'd) does precisely and universally resolve all compound bodies whatsoever, as well minerals as others that are reputed perfectly mixt. lastly, that there are divers qualities which cannot well be refer'd to any of these substances, as if they primarily resided in it and belong'd to it; and some other qualities, which though they seem to have their chief and most ordinary residence in some one of these principles or elements of mixt bodies, are not yet so deducible from it, but that also some more general principles must be taken in to explicate them. if, i say, the chymists (continues _eleutherius_) be so liberall as to make you these three concessions, i hope you will, on your part, be so civil and equitable as to grant them these three other propositions, namely; first, that divers mineral bodies, and therefore probably all the rest, may be resolv'd into a saline, a sulphureous, and a mercurial part; and that almost all vegetable and animal concretes may, if not by the fire alone, yet, by a skilfull artist employing the fire as his chief instrument, be divided into five differing substances, salt, spirit, oyle, phlegme and earth; of which the three former by reason of their being so much more operative than the two later, deserve to be lookt upon as the three active principles, and by way of eminence to be call'd the three principles of mixt bodies. next, that these principles, though they be not perfectly devoid of all mixture, yet may without inconvenience be stil'd the elements of compounded bodies, and bear the names of those substances which they most resemble, and which are manifestly predominant in them; and that especially for this reason, that none of these elements is divisible by the fire into four or five differing substances, like the concrete whence it was separated. lastly, that divers of the qualities of a mixt body, and especially the medical virtues, do for the most part lodge in some one or other of its principles, and may therefore usefully be sought for in that principle sever'd from the others. and in this also (pursues _eleutherius_) methinks both you and the chymists may easily agree, that the surest way is to learn by particular experiments, what differing parts particular bodies do consist of, and by what wayes (either actual or potential fire) they may best and most conveniently be separated, as without relying too much upon the fire alone, for the resolving of bodies, so without fruitlessly contending to force them into more elements than nature made them up of, or strip the sever'd principles so naked, as by making them exquisitely elementary to make them almost useless, these things (subjoynes _eleu._) i propose, without despairing to see them granted by you; not only because i know that you so much preferr the reputation of _candor_ before that of subtility, that your having once suppos'd a truth would not hinder you from imbracing it when clearly made out to you; but because, upon the present occasion, it will be no disparagement to you to recede from some of your paradoxes, since the nature and occasion of your past discourse did not oblige you to declare your own opinions, but only to personate an antagonist of the chymists. so that (concludes he, with a smile) you may now by granting what i propose, add the reputation of loving the truth sincerely to that of having been able to oppose it subtilly. _carneades's_ haste forbidding him to answer this crafty piece of flattery; till i shal (sayes he) have an opportunity to acquaint you with my own opinions about the controversies i have been discoursing of, you will not, i hope, expect i should declare my own sence of the arguments i have employ'd. wherefore i shall only tell you thus much at present; that though not only an acute naturalist, but even i my self could take plausible exceptions at some of them; yet divers of them too are such as will not perhaps be readily answer'd, and will reduce my adversaries, at least, to alter and reform their _hypothesis_. i perceive i need not minde you that the objections i made against the quaternary of elements and ternary of principles needed not to be oppos'd so much against the doctrines themselves (either of which, especially the latter, may be much more probably maintain'd than hitherto it seems to have been, by those writers for it i have met with) as against the unaccurateness and the unconcludingness of the _analytical_ experiments vulgarly relyed on to demonstrate them. and therefore, if either of the two examin'd opinions, or any other theory of elements, shall upon rational and experimental grounds be clearly made out to me; 'tis obliging, but not irrational, in you to expect, that i shall not be so farr in love with my disquieting doubts, as not to be content to change them for undoubted truths. and (concludes _carneades_ smiling) it were no great disparagement for a sceptick to confesse to you, that as unsatisfy'd as the past discourse may have made you think me with the doctrines of the peripateticks, and the chymists, about the elements and principles, i can yet so little discover what to acquiesce in, that perchance the enquiries of others have scarce been more unsatisfactory to me, than my own have been to my self. _finis._ * * * * * the authors constant absence from the presse, whilst the former treatise was printing, and the nature of the subject it self, wherewith ordinary composers are not wont to be at all acquainted, will, 'tis hop'd, procure the readers excuse, till the next edition, if the _errata_ be somewhat numerous, and if among them there want not some grosser mistakes, which yet are not the only blemishes these lines must take notice of and acknowledg; for the author now perceives that through the fault of those to whom he had committed the former treatise in loose sheets, some papers that belonged to it, have altogether miscarryed. and though it have luckily enough happen'd, for the most part, that the omission of them does not marr the cohærence of the rest; yet till the next design'd edition afford an _opportunity_ of inserting them, it is thought fit that the printer give notice of one omission at the end of the first dialogue; and that to these _errata_ there be annex'd the ensuing sheet of paper, that was casually lost, or forgotten by him that should have put it into the presse; where it ought to have been inserted, in the . printed page, at the break, betwixt the words, [_nature_] in the th. line, and [_but_] in the next line after. though it is to be noted here, that by the mistake of the printer, in some books, the number of is placed at the top of two somewhat distant pages; and in such copies the following addition ought to be inserted in the latter of the two, as followeth. and on this occasion i cannot but take notice, that whereas the great argument which the chymists are wont to employ to vilify earth and water, and make them be look'd upon as useless and unworthy to be reckon'd among the principles of mixt bodies, is, that they are not endow'd with specifick properties, but only with elementary qualities; of which they use to speak very sleightingly, as of qualities contemptible and unactive: i see no sufficient reason for this practice of the chymists: for 'tis confess'd that heat is an elementary quality, and yet that an almost innumerable company of considerable things are perform'd by heat, is manifest to them that duly consider the various _phænomena_ wherein it intervenes as a principall actor; and none ought less to ignore or distrust this truth then a chymist. since almost all the operations and productions of his art are performed chiefly by the means of heat. and as for cold it self, upon whose account they so despise the earth and water, if they please to read in the voyages of our english and dutch navigators in _nova zembla_ and other northern regions what stupendious things may be effected by cold, they would not perhaps think it so despicable. and not to repeat what i lately recited to you out of _paracelsus_ himself, who by the help of an intense cold teaches to separate the quintessence of wine; i will only now observe to you, that the conservation of the texture of many bodies both animate and inanimate do's so much depend upon the convenient motion both of their own fluid and looser parts, and of the ambient bodies, whether air, water, &c. that not only in humane bodies we see that the immoderate or unseasonable coldness of the air (especially when it finds such bodies overheated) do's very frequently discompose the _oeconomie_ of them, and occasion variety of diseases; but in the solid and durable body of iron it self, in which one would not expect that suddain cold should produce any notable change, it may have so great an operation, that if you take a wire, or other slender piece of steel, and having brought it in the fire to a white heat, you suffer it afterwards to cool leasurely in the air, it will when it is cold be much of the same hardnesse it was of before: whereas if as soon as you remove it from the fire, you plunge it into cold water, it will upon the sudden refrigeration acquire a very much greater hardness then it had before; nay, and will become manifestly brittle. and that you may not impute this to any peculiar quality in the water, or other liquor, or unctuous matter, wherein such heated steel is wont to be quenched that it may be temper'd; i know a very skillful tradesman, that divers times hardens steel by suddenly cooling it in a body that is neither a liquor, nor so much as moist. a tryal of that nature i remember i have seen made. and however by the operation that water has upon steel quenched in it, whether upon the account of its coldness and moisture, or upon that of any other of its qualities, it appears, that water is not alwaies so inefficacious and contemptible a body, as our chymists would have it passe for. and what i have said of the efficacy of cold and heat, might perhaps be easily enough carried further by other considerations and experiments; were it not that having been mention'd only upon the bye, i must not insist on it, but proceed to another subject. _errata._ pag. . line. . read _so qualify'd_, . . _ratiocinations_, . . _for a_, . . in a parenth. (_that is no more_), . . _besides another caput_, . . _employ_, . . _structure_, . . _sack_, ibid. . _sack_, . . instead of _appear it, will_, leg. _appear, it will_, . . _leasure_, ibid. _principal_, . . _and till it suffer_, . . leg. in parenth. (_notwithstanding, &c._ . . _so_, . . [greek: synchysis], . . _nor have been resolved_, . . _magistram_, . . _lately_, . . _tunned_, . . _intolerable_, ibid. . _in_, . . _tegularum_, . . _distill'd from_, . . dele _the_, . . _bodies_, . . [transcriber's note: .] _fugitive_, . . instead of _all_ lege _a pound_, . . _chymist_, . . _ashes off_, . . _deopilative)_, . . _it self_, . . [greek: ousia analogos], _ibid._ [greek: astrôn stoicheiô], . . make a parenth. at the words, _by the_, and shut it after the words in the . line _at all_, . . _corals_, . . _ascribes_, . . _porosity_, ibid. . _noted_, . . _bodies_, . . _(attended_, . . dele _to_, . . _devisers_, . . _and_, . . _too_, . . _fugitivenesse_, . . _origine_, ibid. . _contrivance of_, . . _nay, barthias_, . [transcriber's note: .] . _in; i will_, . . _absurd_, . . [transcriber's note: .] _goutieres_, . . _antea_, . . _compertissimum_, ibid. . _joachimica_, ibid. _graminis_, ibid. . _sua_ [transcriber's note: this appears to be correct on the original page ], . . _dutch account_, . . _diggers)_, ibid. . and . lin. read _damp as the englishmen also call it_, . . _a height_, . . _in use_, . . _latter; and_, ibid. . _water; i_, . . _rest_, ibid. . _know)_, . . after _aggregate_ insert _or complex_, ibid. . dele ), ibid. . dele ), . . before _as_ begin a parenth. which ends lin. . at _gold_, ibid. instead of _which_, put _this_, ibid. . with the word _texture_ should be connected the next line, _though_, and this word _though_ is to have put before it a parenthesis, which is to end at the word _fluid_ in the th. line, . . _regulus martis stellatus_, . . _relations_, ibid. . _chymist_, . . _confesse by teaching it_, . . _and yet may_, . . _an_, ibid. . _of_, . [transcriber's note: line ] _distinct tasts_, . . _talck_, . . _earth_, . . _parts_, . . _sal-petræ_, . . after _it_ put in _sal_. * * * * * _the publisher doth advertise the redaer [transcriber's note: reader], that seeing there are divers experiments related in this treatise, which the author is not unwilling to submit to the consideration also of forraign philosophers, he believes this piece will be very soon translated into latin._ end. [illustration: _to face the title._] experiments and observations on different kinds of air. [price s. unbound.] quamobrem, si qua est erga creatorem humilitas, si qua operum ejus reverentia et magnificatio, si qua charitas in homines, si erga necessitates et ærumnas humanas relevandas studium, si quis amor veritatis in naturalibus, et odium tenebrarum, et intellectus purificandi desiderium; orandi sunt homines iterum atque iterum, ut, missis philosophiis istis volaticis et preposteris, quæ theses hypothesibus anterposuerunt, et experientiam captivam duxerunt, atque de operibus dei triumpharunt, summisse, et cum veneratione quadam, ad volumen creaturarum evolvendum accedant; atque in eo moram faciant, meditentur, et ab opinionibus abluti et mundi, caste et integre versentur.----in interpretatione ejus eruenda nulli operæ parcant, sed strenue procedant, persistant, immoriantur. lord bacon in instauratione magna. experiments and observations on different kinds of air. by joseph priestley, ll.d. f.r.s. the second edition corrected. fert animus causas tantarum expromere rerum; immensumque aperitur opus. lucan london: printed for j. johnson, no. , in st. paul's church-yard. mdcclxxv. to the right honourable the earl of shelburne, this treatise is with the greatest gratitude and respect, inscribed, by his lordship's most obliged, and obedient humble servant, j. priestley. transcriber's note: footnotes have been moved to the end of the chapter. the errata listed at the end of the book have been corrected in the text. in the text, there are places where the apothecary symbols for ounce and dram are used. these are changed to oz. and dr. in the text file. the preface. one reason for the present publication has been the favourable reception of those of my _observations on different kinds of air_, which were published in the philosophical transactions for the year , and the demand for them by persons who did not chuse, for the sake of those papers only, to purchase the whole volume in which they were contained. another motive was the _additions_ to my observations on this subject, in consequence of which my papers grew too large for such a publication as the _philosophical transactions_. contrary, therefore, to my intention, expressed philosophical transactions, vol. . p. , but with the approbation of the president, and of my friends in the society, i have determined to send them no more papers for the present on this subject, but to make a separate and immediate publication of all that i have done with respect to it. besides, considering the attention which, i am informed, is now given to this subject by philosophers in all parts of europe, and the rapid progress that has already been made, and may be expected to be made in this branch of knowledge, all unnecessary delays in the publication of experiments relating to it are peculiarly unjustifiable. when, for the sake of a little more reputation, men can keep brooding over a new fact, in the discovery of which they might, possibly, have very little real merit, till they think they can astonish the world with a system as complete as it is new, and give mankind a prodigious idea of their judgment and penetration; they are justly punished for their ingratitude to the fountain of all knowledge, and for their want of a genuine love of science and of mankind, in finding their boasted discoveries anticipated, and the field of honest fame pre-occupied, by men, who, from a natural ardour of mind, engage in philosophical pursuits, and with an ingenuous simplicity immediately communicate to others whatever occurs to them in their inquiries. as to myself, i find it absolutely impossible to produce a work on this subject that shall be any thing like _complete_. my first publication i acknowledged to be very imperfect, and the present, i am as ready to acknowledge, is still more so. but, paradoxical as it may seem, this will ever be the case in the progress of natural science, so long as the works of god are, like himself, infinite and inexhaustible. in completing one discovery we never fail to get an imperfect knowledge of others, of which we could have no idea before; so that we cannot solve one doubt without creating several new ones. travelling on this ground resembles pope's description of travelling among the alps, with this difference, that here there is not only _succession_, but an _increase_ of new objects and new difficulties. so pleas'd at first the tow'ring alps we try, mount o'er the vales, and seem to tread the sky. th' eternal snows appear already past, and the first clouds and mountains seem the last, but those attain'd, we tremble to survey the growing labours of the lengthen'd way. th' increasing prospect tires our wand'ring eyes, hills peep o'er hills, and alps on alps arise. essay on criticism. newton, as he had very little knowledge of _air_, so he had few doubts concerning it. had dr. hales, after his various and valuable investigations, given a list of all his _desiderata_, i am confident that he would not have thought of one in ten that had occurred to me at the time of my last publication; and my doubts, queries, and hints for new experiments are very considerably increased, after a series of investigations, which have thrown great light upon many things of which i was not able to give any explanation before. i would observe farther, that a person who means to serve the cause of science effectually, must hazard his own reputation so far as to risk even _mistakes_ in things of less moment. among a multiplicity of new objects, and new relations, some will necessarily pass without sufficient attention; but if a man be not mistaken in the principal objects of his pursuits, he has no occasion to distress himself about lesser things. in the progress of his inquiries he will generally be able to rectify his own mistakes; or if little and envious souls should take a malignant pleasure in detecting them for him, and endeavouring to expose him, he is not worthy of the name of a philosopher, if he has not strength of mind sufficient to enable him not to be disturbed at it. he who does not foolishly affect to be above the failings of humanity, will not be mortified when it is proved that he is but a man. in this work, as well as in all my other philosophical writings, i have made it a rule not to conceal the _real views_ with which i have made experiments; because though, by following a contrary maxim, i might have acquired a character of greater sagacity, i think that two very good ends are answered by the method that i have adopted. for it both tends to make a narrative of a course of experiments more interesting, and likewise encourages other adventurers in experimental philosophy; shewing them that, by pursuing even false lights, real and important truths may be discovered, and that in seeking one thing we often find another. in some respects, indeed, this method makes the narrative _longer_, but it is by making it less tedious; and in other respects i have written much more concisely than is usual with those who publish accounts of their experiments. in this treatise the reader will often find the result of long processes expressed in a few lines, and of many such in a single paragraph; each of which, if i had, with the usual parade, described it at large (explaining first the _preparation_, then reciting the _experiment_ itself, with the _result_ of it, and lastly making suitable _reflections_) would have made as many sections or chapters, and have swelled my book to a pompous and respectable size. but i have the pleasure to think that those philosophers who have but little time to spare for _reading_, which is always the case with those who _do_ much themselves, will thank me for not keeping them too long from their own pursuits; and that they will find rather more in the volume, than the appearance of it promises. i do not think it at all degrading to the business of experimental philosophy, to compare it, as i often do, to the diversion of _hunting_, where it sometimes happens that those who have beat the ground the most, and are consequently the best acquainted with it, weary themselves without starting any game; when it may fall in the way of a mere passenger; so that there is but little room for boasting in the most successful termination of the chace. the best founded praise is that which is due to the man, who, from a supreme veneration for the god of nature, takes pleasure in contemplating his _works_, and from a love of his fellow-creatures, as the offspring of the same all-wise and benevolent parent, with a grateful sense and perfect enjoyment of the means of happiness of which he is already possessed, seeks, with earnestness, but without murmuring or impatience, that greater _command of the powers of nature_, which can only be obtained by a more extensive and more accurate _knowledge_ of them; and which alone can enable us to avail ourselves of the numerous advantages with which we are surrounded, and contribute to make our common situation more secure and happy. besides, the man who believes that there is a _governor_ as well as a _maker_ of the world (and there is certainly equal reason to believe both) will acknowledge his providence and favour at least as much in a successful pursuit of _knowledge_, as of _wealth_; which is a sentiment that entirely cuts off all boasting with respect to ourselves, and all envy and jealousy with respect to others; and disposes us mutually to rejoice in every new light that we receive, through whose hands soever it be conveyed to us. i shall pass for an enthusiast with some, but i am perfectly easy under the imputation, because i am happy in those views which subject me to it; but considering the amazing improvements in natural knowledge which have been made within the last century, and the many ages, abounding with men who had no other object but study, in which, however, nothing of this kind was done, there appears to me to be a very particular providence in the concurrence of those circumstances which have produced so great a change; and i cannot help flattering myself that this will be instrumental in bringing about other changes in the state of the world, of much more consequence to the improvement and happiness of it. this rapid progress of knowledge, which, like the progress of a _wave_ of the sea, of _sound_, or of _light_ from the sun, extends itself not this way or that way only, but _in all directions_, will, i doubt not, be the means, under god, of extirpating _all_ error and prejudice, and of putting an end to all undue and usurped authority in the business of _religion_, as well as of _science_; and all the efforts of the interested friends of corrupt establishments of all kinds will be ineffectual for their support in this enlightened age: though, by retarding their downfal, they may make the final ruin of them more complete and glorious. it was ill policy in leo the xth to patronize polite literature. he was cherishing an enemy in disguise. and the english hierarchy (if there be any thing unsound in its constitution) has equal reason to tremble even at an air-pump, or an electrical machine. there certainly never was any period in which _natural knowledge_ made such a progress as it has done of late years, and especially in this country; and they who affect to speak with supercilious contempt of the publications of the present age in general, or of the royal society in particular, are only those who are themselves engaged in the most trifling of all literary pursuits, who are unacquainted with all real science, and are ignorant of the progress and present state of it.[ ] it is true that the rich and the great in this country give less attention to these subjects than, i believe, they were ever known to do, since the time of lord bacon, and much less than men of rank and fortune in other countries give to them. but with us this loss is made up by men of leisure, spirit, and ingenuity, in the middle ranks of life, which is a circumstance that promises better for the continuance of this progress in useful knowledge than any noble or royal patronage. with us, politics chiefly engage the attention of those who stand foremost in the community, which, indeed, arises from the _freedom_ and peculiar _excellence_ of our constitution, without which even the spirit of men of letters in general, and of philosophers in particular, who never directly interfere in matters of government, would languish. it is rather to be regretted, however, that, in such a number of nobility and gentry, so very few should have any taste for scientifical pursuits, because, for many valuable purposes of science, _wealth_ gives a decisive advantage. if extensive and lasting _fame_ be at all an object, literary, and especially scientifical pursuits, are preferable to political ones in a variety of respects. the former are as much more favourable for the display of the human faculties than the latter, as the _system of nature_ is superior to any _political system_ upon earth. if extensive _usefulness_ be the object, science has the same advantage over politics. the greatest success in the latter seldom extends farther than one particular country, and one particular age; whereas a successful pursuit of science makes a man the benefactor of all mankind, and of every age. how trifling is the fame of any statesman that this country has ever produced to that of lord bacon, of newton, or of boyle; and how much greater are our obligations to such men as these, than to any other in the whole _biographia britannica_; and every country, in which science has flourished, can furnish instances for similar observations. here my reader will thank me, and the writer will, i hope, forgive me, if i quote a passage from the postscript of a letter which i happen to have just received from that excellent, and in my opinion, not too enthusiastical philosopher, father beccaria of turin. _mi spiace che il mondo politico ch'è pur tanto passeggero, rubbi il grande franklin al mondo della natura, che non sa ne cambiare, ne mancare._ in english. "i am sorry that the _political world_, which is so very transitory, should take the great franklin from the _world of nature_, which can never change, or fail." i own it is with peculiar pleasure that i quote this passage, respecting this truly great man, at a time when some of the infatuated politicians of this country are vainly thinking to build their wretched and destructive projects, on the ruins of his established reputation; a reputation as extensive as the spread of science itself, and of which it is saying very little indeed, to pronounce that it will last and flourish when the names of all his enemies shall be forgotten. i think it proper, upon this occasion, to inform my friends, and the public, that i have, for the present, suspended my design of writing _the history and present state of all the branches of experimental philosophy_. this has arisen not from any dislike of the undertaking, but, in truth, because i see no prospect of being reasonably indemnified for so much labour and expence, notwithstanding the specimens i have already given of that work (in the _history of electricity_, and of the _discoveries relating to vision, light, and colours_) have met with a much more favourable reception from the best judges both at home and abroad, than i expected. immortality, if i should have any view to it, is not the proper price of such works as these. i propose, however, having given so much attention to the subject of _air_, to write, at my leisure, the history and present state of discoveries relating to it; in which case i shall, as a part of it, reprint this work, with such improvements as shall have occurred to me at that time; and i give this notice of it, that no person who intends to purchase it may have reason (being thus apprised of my intention) to complain of buying the same thing twice. if any person chuse it, he may save his five or six shillings for the present, and wait five or six years longer (if i should live so long) for the opportunity of buying the same thing, probably much enlarged, and at the same time a complete account of all that has been done by others relating to this subject. though for the plain, and i hope satisfactory reason above mentioned, i shall probably write no other _histories_ of this kind, i shall, as opportunity serves, endeavour to provide _materials_ for such histories, by continuing my experiments, keeping my eyes open to such new appearances as may present themselves, investigating them as far as i shall be able, and never failing to communicate to the public, by some channel or other, the result of my observations. in the publication of this work i have thought that it would be agreeable to my readers to preserve, in some measure, the order of history, and therefore i have not thrown together all that i have observed with respect to each kind of air, but have divided the work into _two parts_; the former containing what was published before, in the philosophical transactions, with such observations and corrections as subsequent experience has suggested to me; and i have reserved for the latter part of the work an account of the experiments which i have made since that publication, and after a pretty long interruption in my philosophical pursuits, in the course of the last summer. besides i am sensible that in the latter part of this work a different arrangement of the subjects will be more convenient, for their mutual illustration. some persons object to the term _air_, as applied to _acid_, _alkaline_, and even _nitrous air_; but it is certainly very convenient to have a common term by which to denote things which have so many common properties, and those so very striking; all of them agreeing with the air in which we breathe, and with _fixed air_, in _elasticity_, and _transparency_, and in being alike affected by heat or cold; so that to the eye they appear to have no difference at all. with much more reason, as it appears to me, might a person object to the common term _metal_, as applied to things so very different from one another as gold, quicksilver, and lead. besides, _acid_ and _alkaline_ air do not differ from _common air_ (in any respect that can countenance an objection to their having a common appellation) except in such properties as are common to it with _fixed air_, though in a different degree; viz. that of being imbibed by water. but, indeed, all kinds of air, common air itself not excepted, are capable of being imbibed by water in some degree. some may think the terms acid and alkaline _vapour_ more proper than acid and alkaline _air_. but the term _vapour_ having always been applied to elastic matters capable of being condensed in the temperature of the atmosphere, especially the vapour of water, it seems harsh to apply it to any elastic substance, which at the same time that it is as transparent as the air we breathe, is no more affected by cold than it is. as my former papers were immediately translated into several foreign languages, i may presume that this treatise, having a better title to it, will be translated also; and, upon this presumption, i cannot help expressing a wish, that it may be done by persons who have a competent knowledge of _subject_, as well as of the _english language_. the mistakes made by some foreigners, have induced me to give this caution. _london, feb._ _ ._ advertisement. the _weights_ mentioned in the course of this treatise are _troy_, and what is called _an ounce measure of air_, is the space occupied by an ounce weight of water, which is equal to grains, and is, therefore, almost two _cubic inches_ of water; for one cubic inch weighs grains. footnotes: [ ] see sir john pringle's _discourse on the different kinds of air_, p. , which, if it became me to do it, i would recommend to the reader, as containing a just and elegant account of the several discoveries that have been successively made, relating to the subject of this treatise. the contents. the introduction. section i. _a general view of preceding discoveries relating to air_ page sect. ii. _an account of the apparatus with which the following experiments were made_ part i. _experiments and observations made in, and before the year ._ sect. i. _of fixed air_ sect. ii. _of air in which a candle, or brimstone, has burned out_ sect. iii. _of inflammable air_ sect. iv. _of air infected with animal respiration, or putrefaction_ sect. v. _of air in which a mixture of brimstone and filings of iron has stood_ sect. vi. _of nitrous air_ sect. vii. _of air infected with the fumes of burning charcoal_ sect. viii. _of the effect of the calcination of metals, and of the effluvia of paint made with white-lead and oil, on air_ sect. ix. _of marine acid air_ sect. x. _miscellaneous observations_ part ii. _experiments and observations made in the year , and the beginning of ._ sect. i. _observations on alkaline air_ sect. ii. _of common air diminished, and made noxious by various processes_ sect. iii. _of nitrous air_ sect. iv. _of marine acid air_ sect. v. _of inflammable air_ sect. vi. _of fixed air_ sect. vii. miscellaneous experiments sect. viii. _queries, speculations, and hints_ the appendix. number i. _experiments made by mr. hey to prove that there is no oil of vitriol in water impregnated with fixed air_ number ii. _a letter from mr. hey to dr. priestley, concerning the effects of fixed air applied by way of clyster_ number iii. _observations on the medicinal uses of fixed air. by thomas percival, m. d. fellow of the royal society, and of the society of antiquaries in london_ number iv. _extract of a letter from william falconer, m. d. of bath_ number v. _extract of a letter from mr. william bewley, of great massingham, norfolk_ num. vi. _a letter from dr. franklin_ number vii. _extract of letter from mr. henry of manchester_ the introduction. section i. _a general view of preceding discoveries relating to air._ for the better understanding of the experiments and observations on different kinds of air contained in this treatise, it will be useful to those who are not acquainted with the history of this branch of natural philosophy, to be informed of those facts which had been discovered by others, before i turned my thoughts to the subject; which suggested, and by the help of which i was enabled to pursue, my inquiries. let it be observed, however, that i do not profess to recite in this place _all_ that had been discovered concerning air, but only those discoveries the knowledge of which is necessary, in order to understand what i have done myself; so that any person who is only acquainted with the general principles of natural philosophy, may be able to read this treatise, and, with proper attention, to understand every part of it. that the air which constitutes the atmosphere in which we live has _weight_, and that it is _elastic_, or consists of a compressible and dilatable fluid, were some of the earliest discoveries that were made after the dawning of philosophy in this western part of the world. that elastic fluids, differing essentially from the air of the atmosphere, but agreeing with it in the properties of weight, elasticity, and transparency, might be generated from solid substances, was discovered by mr. boyle, though two remarkable kinds of factitious air, at least the effects of them, had been known long before to all miners. one of these is heavier than common air. it lies at the bottom of pits, extinguishes candles, and kills animals that breathe it, on which account it had obtained the name of the _choke damp_. the other is lighter than common air, taking its place near the roofs of subterraneous places, and because it is liable to take fire, and explode, like gunpowder, it had been called the _fire damp_. the word _damp_ signifies _vapour_ or _exhalation_ in the german and saxon language. though the former of these kinds of air had been known to be noxious, the latter i believe had not been discovered to be so, having always been found in its natural state, so much diluted with common air, as to be breathed with safety. air of the former kind, besides having been discovered in various caverns, particularly the _grotta del cane_ in italy, had also been observed on the surface of fermenting liquors, and had been called _gas_ (which is the same with _geist_, or _spirit_) by van helmont, and other german chymists; but afterwards it obtained the name of _fixed air_, especially after it had been discovered by dr. black of edinburgh to exist, in a fixed state, in alkaline salts, chalk, and other calcareous substances. this excellent philosopher discovered that it is the presence of the fixed air in these substances that renders them _mild_, and that when they are deprived of it, by the force of fire, or any other process, they are in that state which had been called _caustic_, from their corroding or burning animal and vegetable substances. fixed air had been discovered by dr. macbride of dublin, after an observation of sir john pringle's, which led to it, to be in a considerable degree antiseptic; and since it is extracted in great plenty from fermenting vegetables, he had recommended the use of _wort_ (that is an infusion of malt in water) as what would probably give relief in the sea-scurvy, which is said to be a putrid disease. dr. brownrigg had also discovered that the same species of air is contained in great quantities in the water of the pyrmont spring at spa in germany, and in other mineral waters, which have what is called an _acidulous_ taste, and that their peculiar flavour, briskness, and medicinal virtues, are derived from this ingredient. dr. hales, without seeming to imagine that there was any material difference between these kinds of air and common air, observed that certain substances and operations _generate_ air, and others _absorb_ it; imagining that the diminution of air was simply a taking away from the common mass, without any alteration in the properties of what remained. his experiments, however, are so numerous, and various, that they are justly esteemed to be the solid foundation of all our knowledge of this subject. mr. cavendish had exactly ascertained the specific gravities of fixed and inflammable air, shewing the former of them to be - / heavier than common air, and the latter ten times lighter. he also shewed that water would imbibe more than its own bulk of fixed air. lastly, mr. lane discovered that water thus impregnated with fixed air will dissolve a considerable quantity of iron, and thereby become a strong chalybeate. these, i would observe, are by no means all the discoveries concerning air that have been made by the gentlemen whose names i have mentioned, and still less are they all that have been made by others; but they comprise all the previous knowledge of this subject that is necessary to the understanding of this treatise; except a few particulars, which will be mentioned in the course of the work, and which it is, therefore, unnecessary to recite in this place. section ii. _an account of the apparatus with which the following experiments were made._ rather than describe at large the manner in which every particular experiment that i shall have occasion to recite was made, which would both be very tedious, and require an unnecessary multiplicity of drawings, i think it more adviseable to give, at one view, an account of all my apparatus and instruments, or at least of every thing that can require a description, and of all the different operations and processes in which i employ them. it will be seen that my apparatus for experiments on air is, in fact, nothing more than the apparatus of dr. hales, dr. brownrigg, and mr. cavendish, diversified, and made a little more simple. yet notwithstanding the simplicity of this apparatus, and the ease with which all the operations are conducted, i would not have any person, who is altogether without experience, to imagine that he shall be able to select any of the following experiments, and immediately perform it, without difficulty or blundering. it is known to all persons who are conversant in experimental philosophy, that there are many little attentions and precautions necessary to be observed in the conducting of experiments, which cannot well be described in words, but which it is needless to describe, since practice will necessarily suggest them; though, like all other arts in which the hands and fingers are made use of, it is only _much practice_ that can enable a person to go through complex experiments, of this or any other kind, with ease and readiness. for experiments in which air will bear to be confined by water, i first used an oblong trough made of earthen ware, as _a_ fig. . about eight inches deep, at one end of which i put thin flat stones, _b. b._ about an inch, or half an inch, under the water, using more or fewer of them according to the quantity of water in the trough. but i have since found it more convenient to use a larger wooden trough, of the same general shape, eleven inches deep, two feet long, and - / wide, with a shelf about an inch lower than the top, instead of the flat stones above-mentioned. this trough being larger than the former, i have no occasion to make provision for the water being higher or lower, the bulk of a jar or two not making so great a difference as did before. the several kinds of air i usually keep in _cylindrical jars_, as _c_, _c_, fig. , about ten inches long, and - / wide, being such as i have generally used for electrical batteries, but i have likewise vessels of very different forms and sizes, adapted to particular experiments. when i want to remove vessels of air from the large trough, i place them in _pots_ or _dishes_, of various sizes, to hold more or less water, according to the time that i have occasion to keep the air, as fig. . these i plunge in water, and slide the jars into them; after which they may be taken out together, and be set wherever it shall be most convenient. for the purpose of merely removing a jar of air from one place to another, where it is not to stand longer than a few days, i make use of common _tea-dishes_, which will hold water enough for that time, unless the air be in a state of diminution, by means of any process that is going on in it. if i want to try whether an animal will live in any kind of air, i first put the air into a small vessel, just large enough to give it room to stretch itself; and as i generally make use of _mice_ for this purpose, i have found it very convenient to use the hollow part of a tall beer-glass, _d_ fig. , which contains between two and three ounce measures of air. in this vessel a mouse will live twenty minutes, or half an hour. for the purpose of these experiments it is most convenient to catch the mice in small wire traps, out of which it is easy to take them, and holding them by the back of the neck, to pass them through the water into the vessel which contains the air. if i expect that the mouse will live a considerable time, i take care to put into the vessel something on which it may conveniently sit, out of the reach of the water. if the air be good, the mouse will soon be perfectly at its ease, having suffered nothing by its passing through the water. if the air be supposed to be noxious, it will be proper (if the operator be desirous of preserving the mice for farther use) to keep hold of their tails, that they may be withdrawn as soon as they begin to shew signs of uneasiness; but if the air be thoroughly noxious, and the mouse happens to get a full inspiration, it will be impossible to do this before it be absolutely irrecoverable. in order to _keep_ the mice, i put them into receivers open at the top and bottom, standing upon plates of tin perforated with many holes, and covered with other plates of the same kind, held down by sufficient weights, as fig. . these receivers stand upon _a frame of wood_, that the fresh air may have an opportunity of getting to the bottoms of them, and circulating through them. in the inside i put a quantity of paper or tow, which must be changed, and the vessel washed and dried, every two or three days. this is most conveniently done by having another receiver, ready cleaned and prepared, into which the mice may be transferred till the other shall be cleaned. mice must be kept in a pretty exact temperature, for either much heat or much cold kills them presently. the place in which i have generally kept them is a shelf over the kitchen fire-place where, as it is usual in yorkshire, the fire never goes out; so that the heat varies very little, and i find it to be, at a medium, about degrees of fahrenheit's thermometer. when they had been made to pass through the water, as they necessarily must be in order to a change of air, they require, and will bear a very considerable degree of heat, to warm and dry them. i found, to my great surprize, in the course of these experiments, that mice will live intirely without water; for though i have kept them for three or four months, and have offered them water several times, they would never taste it; and yet they continued in perfect health and vigour. two or three of them will live very peaceably together in the same vessel; though i had one instance of a mouse tearing another almost in pieces, and when there was plenty of provisions for both of them. in the same manner in which a mouse is put into a vessel of any kind of air, a _plant_, or any thing else, may be put into it, viz. by passing it through the water; and if the plant be of a kind that will grow in water only, there will be no occasion to set it in a pot of earth, which will otherwise be necessary. there may appear, at first sight, some difficulty in opening the mouth of a phial, containing any substance, solid or liquid, to which water must not be admitted, in a jar of any kind of air, which is an operation that i have sometimes had recourse to; but this i easily effect by means of _a cork cut tapering_, and a strong, wire thrust through it, as in fig. , for in this form it will sufficiently fit the mouth of any phial, and by holding the phial in one hand, and the wire in the other, and plunging both my hands into the trough of water, i can easily convey the phial through the water into the jar; which must either be held by an assistant, or be fastened by strings, with its mouth projecting over the shelf. when the phial is thus conveyed into the jar, the cork may easily be removed, and may also be put into it again at pleasure, and conveyed the same way out again. when any thing, as a gallipot, &c. is to be supported at a considerable height within a jar, it is convenient to have such _wire stands_ as are represented fig. . they answer better than any other, because they take up but little room, and may be easily bended to any shape or height. if i have occasion to pour air from a vessel with a wide mouth into another with a very narrow one, i am obliged to make use of a funnel, fig. , but by this means the operation is exceedingly easy; first filling the vessel into which the air is to be conveyed with water, and holding the mouth of it, together with the funnel, both under water with one hand, while the other is employed in pouring the air; which, ascending through the funnel up into the vessel, makes the water descend, and takes its place. these funnels are best made of glass, because the air being visible through them, the quantity of it may be more easily estimated by the eye. it will be convenient to have several of these funnels of different sizes. in order to expel air from solid substances by means of heat, i sometimes put them into a _gun-barrel_, fig. , and filling it up with dry sand, that has been well burned, so that no air can come from it, i lute to the open end the stem of a tobacco pipe, or a small glass tube. then having put the closed end of the barrel, which contains the materials, into the fire, the generated air, issuing through the tube, may be received in a vessel of quicksilver, with its mouth immersed in a bason of the same, suspended all together in wires, in the manner described in the figure: or any other fluid substance may be used instead of quicksilver. but the most accurate method of procuring air from several substances, by means of heat, is to put them, if they will bear it, into phials full of quicksilver, with the mouths immersed in the same, and then throw the focus of a burning mirror upon them. for this purpose the phials should be made with their bottoms round, and very thin, that they may not be liable to break with a pretty sudden application of heat. if i want to expel air from any liquid, i nearly fill a phial with it, and having a cork perforated, i put through it, and secure with cement, a glass tube, bended in the manner represented at _e_ fig. . i then put the phial into a kettle of water, which i set upon the fire and make to boil. the air expelled by the heat, from the liquor contained in the phial, issues through the tube, and is received in the bason of quicksilver, fig. . instead of this suspended bason, i sometimes content myself with tying a flaccid bladder to the end of the tube, in both these processes, that it may receive the newly generated air. in experiments on those kinds of air which are readily imbibed by water, i always make use of quicksilver, in the manner represented fig. , in which _a_ is the bason of quicksilver, _b_ a glass vessel containing quicksilver, with its mouth immersed in it, _c_ a phial containing the ingredients from which the air is to be produced; and _d_ is a small recipient, or glass vessel designed to receive and intercept any liquor that may be discharged along with the air, which is to be transmitted free from any moisture into the vessel _b_. if there be no apprehension of moisture, i make use of the glass tube only, without any recipient, in the manner represented _e_ fig. . in order to invert the vessel _b_, i first fill it with quicksilver, and then carefully cover the mouth of it with a piece of soft leather; after which it may be turned upside down without any danger of admitting the air, and the leather may be withdrawn when it is plunged in the quicksilver. in order to generate air by the solution of metals, or any process of a similar nature, i put the materials into a phial, prepared in the manner represented at _e_ fig. , and put the end of the glass tube under the mouth of any vessel into which i want to convey the air. if heat be necessary i can easily apply to it a candle, or a red hot poker while it hangs in this position. when i have occasion to transfer air from a jar standing in the trough of water to a vessel standing in quicksilver, or in any other situation whatever, i make use of the contrivance represented fig. , which consists of a bladder, furnished at one end with a small glass tube bended, and at the other with a cork, perforated so as just to admit the small end of a funnel. when the common air is carefully pressed out of this bladder, and the funnel is thrust tightly into the cork, it may be filled with any kind of air as easily as a glass jar; and then a string being tied above the cork in which the funnel is inserted, and the orifice in the other cork closed, by pressing the bladder against it, it may be carried to any place, and if the tube be carefully wiped, the air may be conveyed quite free from moisture through a body of quicksilver, or any thing else. a little practice will make this very useful manoeuvre perfectly easy and accurate. in order to impregnate fluids with any kind of air, as water with fixed air, i fill a phial with the fluid larger or less as i have occasion (as _a_ fig. ;) and then inverting it, place it with its mouth downwards, in a bowl _b_, containing a quantity of the same fluid; and having filled the bladder, fig. , with the air, i throw as much of it as i think proper into the phial, in the manner described above. to accelerate the impregnation, i lay my hand on the top of the phial, and shake it as much as i think proper. if, without having any air previously generated, i would convey it into the fluid immediately as it arises from the proper materials, i keep the same bladder in connection with a phial _c_ fig. , containing the same materials (as chalk, salt of tartar, or pearl ashes in diluted oil of vitriol, for the generation of fixed air) and taking care, lest, in the act of effervescence, any of the materials in the phial _c_ should get into the vessel _a_, to place this phial on a stand lower than that on which the bason was placed, i press out the newly generated air, and make it ascend directly into the fluid. for this purpose, and that i may more conveniently shake the phial _c_, which is necessary in some processes, especially with chalk and oil of vitriol, i sometimes make use of a flexible leathern tube _d_, and sometimes only a glass tube. for if the bladder be of a sufficient length, it will give room for the agitation of the phial; or if not, it is easy to connect two bladders together by means of a perforated cork, to which they may both be fastened. when i want to try whether any kind of air will admit a candle to burn in it, i make use of a cylindrical glass vessel, fig. . and a bit of wax candle _a_ fig. , fastened to the end of a wire _b_, and turned up, in such a manner as to be let down into the vessel with the flame upwards. the vessel should be kept carefully covered till the moment that the candle is admitted. in this manner i have frequently extinguished a candle more than twenty times successively, in a vessel of this kind, though it is impossible to dip the candle into it without giving the external air an opportunity of mixing with the air in the inside more or less. the candle _c_, at the other end of the wire is very convenient for holding under a jar standing in water, in order to burn as long as the inclosed air can supply it; for the moment that it is extinguished, it may be drawn through the water before any smoke can have mixed with the air. in order to draw air out of a vessel which has its mouth immersed in water, and thereby to raise the water to whatever height may be necessary, it is very convenient to make use of a glass _syphon_, fig. , putting one of the legs up into the vessel, and drawing the air out at the other end by the mouth. if the air be of a noxious quality, it may be necessary to have a syringe fastened to the syphon, the manner of which needs no explanation. i have not thought it safe to depend upon a valve at the top of the vessel, which dr. hales sometimes made use of. if, however, a very small hole be made at the top of a glass vessel, it may be filled to any height by holding it under water, while the air is issuing out at the hole, which may then be closed with wax or cement. if the generated air will neither be absorbed by water, nor diminish common air, it may be convenient to put part of the materials into a cup, supported by a stand, and the other part into a small glass vessel, placed on the edge of it, as at _f_, fig. . then having, by means of a syphon, drawn the air to at convenient height, the small glass vessel may be easily pushed into the cup, by a wire introduced through the water; or it may be contrived, in a variety of ways, only to discharge the contents of the small vessel into the larger. the distance between the boundary of air and water, before and after the operation, will shew the quantity of the generated air. the effect of processes that _diminish_ air may also be tried by the same apparatus. when i want to admit a particular kind of air to any thing that will not bear wetting, and yet cannot be conveniently put into a phial, and especially if it be in the form of a powder, and must be placed upon a stand (as in those experiments in which the focus of a burning mirror is to be thrown upon it) i first exhaust a receiver, in which it is previously placed; and having a glass tube, bended for the purpose, as in fig. , i screw it to the stem of a transfer of the air pump on which the receiver had been exhausted, and introducing it through the water into a jar of that kind of air with which i would fill the receiver, i only turn the cock, and i gain my purpose. in this method, however, unless the pump be very good, and several contrivances, too minute to be particularly described, be made use of a good deal of common air will get into the receiver. when i want to measure the goodness of any kind of air, i put two measures of it into a jar standing in water; and when i have marked upon the glass the exact place of the boundary of air and water, i put to it one measure of nitrous air; and after waiting a proper time, note the quantity of its diminution. if i be comparing two kinds of air that are nearly alike, after mixing them in a large jar, i transfer the mixture into a long glass tube, by which i can lengthen my scale to what degree i please. if the quantity of the air, the goodness of which i want to ascertain, be exceedingly small, so as to be contained in a part of a glass tube, out of which water will not run spontaneously, as _a_ fig. ; i first measure with a pair of compasses the length of the column of air in the tube, the remaining part being filled with water, and lay it down upon a scale; and then, thrusting a wire of a proper thickness, _b_, into the tube, i contrive, by means of a thin plate of iron, bent to a sharp angle _c_, to draw it out again, when the whole of this little apparatus has been introduced through the water into a jar of nitrous air; and the wire being drawn out, the air from the jar must supply its place. i then measure the length of this column of nitrous air which i have got into the tube, and lay it also down upon the scale, so as to know the exact length of both the columns. after this, holding the tube under water, with a small wire i force the two separate columns of air into contact, and when they have been a sufficient time together, i measure the length of the whole, and compare it with the length of both the columns taken before. a little experience will teach the operator how far to thrust the wire into the tube, in order to admit as much air as he wants and no more. in order to take the electric spark in a quantity of any kind of air, which must be very small, to produce a sensible effect upon it, in a short time, by means of a common machine, i put a piece of wire into the end of a small tube, and fasten it with hot cement, as in fig. ; and having got the air i want into the tube by means of the apparatus fig. , i place it inverted in a bason containing either quicksilver, or any other fluid substance by which i chuse to have the air confined. i then, by the help of the air pump, drive out as much of the air as i think convenient, admitting the quicksilver, &c. to it, as at _a_, and putting a brass ball on the end of the wire, i take the sparks or shocks upon it, and thereby transmit them through the air to the liquor in the tube. to take the electric sparks in any kind of fluid, as oil, &c. i use the same apparatus described above, and having poured into the tube as much of the fluid as i conjecture i can make the electric spark pass through, i fill the rest with quicksilver; and placing it inverted in a bason of quicksilver, i take the sparks as before. if air be generated very fast by this process, i use a tube that is narrow at the top, and grows wider below, as fig. , that the quicksilver may not recede too soon beyond the striking distance. sometimes i have used a different apparatus for this purpose, represented fig. . taking a pretty wide glass tube, hermetically sealed at the upper-end, and open below, at about an inch, or at what distance i think convenient from the top, i get two holes made in it, opposite to each other. through these i put two wires, and fastening them with warm cement, i fix them at what distance i please from each other. between these wires i take the sparks, and the bubbles of air rise, as they are formed, to the top of the tube. part i. _experiments and observations made in, and before the year ._ in writing upon the subject of _different kinds of air_, i find myself at a loss for proper _terms_, by which to distinguish them, those which have hitherto obtained being by no means sufficiently characteristic, or distinct. the only terms in common use are, _fixed air_, _mephitic_, and _inflammable_. the last, indeed, sufficiently characterizes and distinguishes that kind of air which takes fire, and explodes on the approach of flame; but it might have been termed _fixed_ with as much propriety as that to which dr. black and others have given that denomination, since it is originally part of some solid substance, and exists in an unelastic state. all these newly discovered kinds of air may also be called _factitious_; and if, with others, we use the term _fixable_, it is still obvious to remark, that it is applicable to them all; since they are all capable of being imbibed by some substance or other, and consequently of being _fixed_ in them, after they have been in an elastic state. the term _mephitic_ is equally applicable to what is called _fixed air_, to that which is _inflammable_, and to many other kinds; since they are equally noxious, when breathed by animals. rather, however, than either introduce new terms, or change the signification of old ones, i shall use the term _fixed air_, in the sense in which it is now commonly used, and distinguish the other kinds by their properties, or some other periphrasis. i shall be under a necessity, however, of giving names to those kinds of air, to which no names had been given by others, as _nitrous_, _acid_, and _alkaline_. section i. _of fixed air._ it was in consequence of living for some time in the neighbourhood of a public brewery, that i was induced to make experiments on fixed air, of which there is always a large body, ready formed, upon the surface of the fermenting liquor, generally about nine inches, or a foot in depth, within which any kind of substance may be very conveniently placed; and though, in these circumstances, the fixed air must be continually mixing with the common air, and is therefore far from being perfectly pure, yet there is a constant fresh supply from the fermenting liquor, and it is pure enough for many purposes. a person, who is quite a stranger to the properties of this kind of air, would be agreeably amused with extinguishing lighted candles, or chips of wood in it, as it lies upon the surface of the fermenting liquor; for the smoke readily unites with this kind of air, probably by means of the water which it contains; so that very little or none of the smoke will escape into the open air, which is incumbent upon it. it is remarkable, that the upper surface of this smoke, floating in the fixed air, is smooth, and well defined; whereas the lower surface is exceedingly ragged, several parts hanging down to a considerable distance within the body of the fixed air, and sometimes in the form of balls, connected to the upper stratum by slender threads, as if they were suspended. the smoke is also apt to form itself into broad flakes, parallel to the surface of the liquor, and at different distances from it, exactly like clouds. these appearances will sometimes continue above an hour, with very little variation. when this fixed air is very strong, the smoke of a small quantity of gunpowder fired in it will be wholly retained by it, no part escaping into the common air. making an agitation in this air, the surface of it, (which still continues to be exactly defined) is thrown into the form of waves, which it is very amusing to look upon; and if, by this agitation, any of the fixed air be thrown over the side of the vessel, the smoke, which is mixed with it, will fall to the ground, as if it was so much water, the fixed air being heavier than common air. the red part of burning wood was extinguished in this air, but i could not perceive that a red-hot poker was sooner cooled in it. fixed air does not instantly mix with common air. indeed if it did, it could not be caught upon the surface of the fermenting liquor. a candle put under a large receiver, and immediately plunged very deep below the surface of the fixed air, will burn some time. but vessels with the smallest orifices, hanging with their mouths downwards in the fixed air, will _in time_ have the common air, which they contain, perfectly mixed with it. when the fermenting liquor is contained in vessels close covered up, the fixed air, on removing the cover, readily affects the common air which is contiguous to it; so that, candles held at a considerable distance above the surface will instantly go out. i have been told by the workmen, that this will sometimes be the case, when the candles are held two feet above the mouth of the vessel. fixed air unites with the smoke of rosin, sulphur, and other electrical substances, as well as with the vapour of water; and yet, by holding the wire of a charged phial among these fumes, i could not make any electrical atmosphere, which surprized me a good deal, as there was a large body of this smoke, and it was so confined, that it could not escape me. i also held some oil of vitriol in a glass vessel within the fixed air, and by plunging a piece of red-hot glass into it, raised a copious and thick fume. this floated upon the surface of the fixed air like other fumes, and continued as long. considering the near affinity between water and fixed air, i concluded that if a quantity of water was placed near the yeast of the fermenting liquor, it could not fail to imbibe that air, and thereby acquire the principal properties of pyrmont, and some other medicinal mineral waters. accordingly, i found, that when the surface of the water was considerable, it always acquired the pleasant acidulous taste that pyrmont water has. the readiest way of impregnating water with this virtue, in these circumstances, is to take two vessels, and to keep pouring the water from one into the other, when they are both of them held as near the yeast as possible; for by this means a great quantity of surface is exposed to the air, and the surface is also continually changing. in this manner, i have sometimes, in the space of two or three minutes, made a glass of exceedingly pleasant sparkling water, which could hardly be distinguished from very good pyrmont, or rather seltzer water. but the _most effectual_ way of impregnating water with fixed air is to put the vessels which contain the water into glass jars, filled with the purest fixed air made by the solution of chalk in diluted oil of vitriol, standing in quicksilver. in this manner i have, in about two days, made a quantity of water to imbibe more than an equal bulk of fixed air, so that, according to dr. brownrigg's experiments, it must have been much stronger than the best imported pyrmont; for though he made his experiments at the spring-head, he never found that it contained quite so much as half its bulk of this air. if a sufficient quantity of quicksilver cannot be procured, _oil_ may be used with sufficient advantage, for this purpose, as it imbibes the fixed air very slowly. fixed air may be kept in vessels standing in water for a long time, if they be separated by a partition of oil, about half an inch thick. pyrmont water made in these circumstances, is little or nothing inferior to that which has stood in quicksilver. the _readiest_ method of preparing this water for use is to agitate it strongly with a large surface exposed to the fixed air. by this means more than an equal bulk of air may be communicated to a large quantity of water in the space of a few minutes. but since agitation promotes the dissipation of fixed air from water, it cannot be made to imbibe so great a quantity in this method as in the former, where more time is taken. easy directions for impregnating water with fixed air i have published in a small pamphlet, designed originally for the use of seamen in long voyages, on the presumption that it might be of use for preventing or curing the sea scurvy, equally with wort, which was recommended by dr. macbride for this purpose, on no other account than its property of generating fixed air, by its fermentation in the stomach. water thus impregnated with fixed air readily dissolves iron, as mr. lane has discovered; so that if a quantity of iron filings be put to it, it presently becomes a strong chalybeate, and of the mildest and most agreeable kind. i have recommended the use of _chalk_ and oil of vitriol as the cheapest, and, upon the whole, the best materials for this purpose. but some persons prefer _pearl ashes_, _pounded marble_, or other calcareous or _alkaline substances_; and perhaps with reason. my own experience has not been sufficient to enable me to decide in this case. whereas some persons had suspected that a quantity of the oil of vitriol was rendered volatile by this process, i examined it, by all the chemical methods that are in use; but could not find that water thus impregnated contained the least perceivable quantity of that acid. mr. hey, indeed, who assisted me in this examination, found that distilled water, impregnated with fixed air, did not mix so readily with soap as the distilled water itself; but this was also the case when the fixed air had passed through a long glass tube filled with alkaline salts, which, it may be supposed, would have imbibed any of the oil of vitriol that might have been contained in that air[ ]. fixed air itself may be said to be of the nature of an acid, though of a weak and peculiar sort.----mr. bergman of upsal, who honoured me with a letter upon the subject, calls it the _aërial acid_, and, among other experiments to prove it to be an acid, he says that it changes the blue juice of tournesole into red. this mr. hey found to be true, and he moreover discovered that when water tinged blue with the juice of tournesole, and then red with fixed air, has been exposed to the open air, it recovers its blue colour again. the heat of boiling water will expel all the fixed air, if a phial containing the impregnated water be held in it; but it will often require above half an hour to do it completely. dr. percival, who is particularly attentive to every improvement in the medical art, and who has thought so well of this impregnation as to prescribe it in several cases, informs me that it seems to be much stronger, and sparkles more, like the true pyrmont water, after it has been kept some time. this circumstance, however, shews that, in time, the fixed air is more easily disengaged from the water; and though, in this state, it may affect the taste more sensibly, it cannot be of so much use in the stomach and bowels, as when the air is more firmly retained by the water. by the process described in my pamphlet, fixed air may be readily incorporated with wine, beer, and almost any other liquor whatever; and when beer, wine, or cyder, is become flat or dead (which is the consequence of the escape of the fixed air they contained) they may be revived by this means; but the delicate and agreeable flavour, or acidulous taste, communicated by fixed air, and which is very manifest in water, can hardly be perceived in wine, or any liquors which have much taste of their own. i should think that there can be no doubt, but that water thus impregnated with fixed air must have all the medicinal virtues of genuine pyrmont or seltzer water; since these depend upon the fixed air they contain. if the genuine pyrmont water derives any advantage from its being a natural chalybeate, this may also be obtained by providing a common chalybeate water, and using it in these processes, instead of common water. having succeeded so well with this artificial pyrmont water, i imagined that it might be possible to give _ice_ the same virtue, especially as cold is known to promote the absorption of fixed air by water; but in this i found myself quite mistaken. i put several pieces of ice into a quantity of fixed air, confined by quicksilver, but no part of the air was absorbed in two days and two nights; but upon bringing it into a place where the ice melted, the air was absorbed as usual. i then took a quantity of strong artificial pyrmont water, and putting it into a thin glass phial, i set it in a pot that was filled with snow and salt. this mixture instantly freezing the water that was contiguous to the sides of the glass, the air was discharged plentifully, so that i catched a considerable quantity, in a bladder tied to the mouth of the phial. i also took two quantities of the same pyrmont water, and placed one of them where it might freeze, keeping the other in a cold place, but where it would not freeze. this retained its acidulous taste, though the phial which contained it was not corked; whereas the other being brought into the same place, where the ice melted very slowly, had at the same time the taste of common water only. that quantity of water which had been frozen by the mixture of snow and salt, was almost as much like snow as ice, such a quantity of air-bubbles were contained in it, by which it was prodigiously increased in bulk. the pressure of the atmosphere assists very considerably in keeping fixed air confined in water; for in an exhausted receiver, pyrmont water will absolutely boil, by the copious discharge of its air. this is also the reason why beer and ale froth so much _in vacuo_. i do not doubt, therefore, but that, by the help of a condensing engine, water might be much more highly impregnated with the virtues of the pyrmont spring; and it would not be difficult to contrive a method of doing it. the manner in which i made several experiments to ascertain the absorption of fixed air by different fluid substances, was to put the liquid into a dish, and holding it within the body of the fixed air at the brewery, to set a glass vessel into it, with its mouth inverted. this glass being necessarily filled with the fixed air, the liquor would rise into it when they were both taken into the common air, if the fixed air was absorbed at all. making use of _ether_ in this manner, there was a constant bubbling from under the glass, occasioned by this fluid easily rising in vapour, so that i could not, in this method, determine whether it imbibed the air or not. i concluded however, that they did incorporate, from a very disagreeable circumstance, which made me desist from making any more experiments of the kind. for all the beer, over which this experiment was made, contracted a peculiar taste; the fixed air impregnated with the ether being, i suppose, again absorbed by the beer. i have also observed, that water which remained a long time within this air has sometimes acquired a very disagreeable taste. at one time it was like tar-water. how this was acquired, i was very desirous of making some experiments to ascertain, but i was discouraged by the fear of injuring the fermenting liquor. it could not come from the fixed air only. insects and animals which breathe very little are stifled in fixed air, but are not soon quite killed in it. butterflies and flies of other kinds will generally become torpid, and seemingly dead, after being held a few minutes over the fermenting liquor; but they revive again after being brought into the fresh air. but there are very great varieties with respect to the time in which different kinds of flies will either become torpid in the fixed air, or die in it. a large strong frog was much swelled, and seemed to be nearly dead, after being held about six minutes over the fermenting liquor; but it recovered upon being brought into the common air. a snail treated in the same manner died presently. fixed air is presently fatal to vegetable life. at least sprigs of mint growing in water, and placed over the fermenting liquor, will often become quite dead in one day, or even in a less space of time; nor do they recover when they are afterwards brought into the common air. i am told, however, that some other plants are much more hardy in this respect. a red rose, fresh gathered, lost its redness, and became of a purple colour, after being held over the fermenting liquor about twenty-four hours; but the tips of each leaf were much more affected than the rest of it. another red rose turned perfectly white in this situation; but various other flowers of different colours were very little affected. these experiments were not repeated, as i wish they might be done, in pure fixed air, extracted from chalk by means of oil of vitriol. for every purpose, in which it was necessary that the fixed air should be as unmixed as possible, i generally made it by pouring oil of vitriol upon chalk and water, catching it in a bladder fastened to the neck of the phial in which they were contained, taking care to press out all the common air, and also the first, and sometimes the second, produce of fixed air; and also, by agitation, making it as quickly as i possibly could. at other times, i made it pass from the phial in which it was generated through a glass tube, without the intervention of any bladder, which, as i found by experience, will not long make a sufficient separation between several kinds of air and common air. i had once thought that the readiest method of procuring fixed air, and in sufficient purity, would be by the simple process of burning chalk, or pounded lime-stone in a gun-barrel, making it pass through the stem of a tobacco-pipe, or a glass tube carefully luted to the orifice of it. in this manner i found that air is produced in great plenty; but, upon examining it, i found, to my very great surprise, that little more than one half of it was fixed air, capable of being absorbed by water; and that the rest was inflammable, sometimes very weakly, but sometimes pretty highly so. whence this inflammability proceeds, i am not able to determine, the lime or chalk not being supposed to contain any other than fixed air. i conjecture, however, that it must proceed from the iron, and the separation of it from the calx may be promoted by that small quantity of oil of vitriol, which i am informed is contained in chalk, if not in lime-stone also. but it is an objection to this hypothesis, that the inflammable air produced in this manner burns blue, and not at all like that which is produced from iron, or any other metal, by means of an acid. it also has not the smell of that kind of inflammable air which is produced from mineral substances. besides, oil of vitriol without water, will not dissolve iron; nor can inflammable air be got from it, unless the acid be considerably diluted; and when i mixed brimstone with the chalk, neither the quality nor the quantity of the air was changed by it. indeed no air, or permanently elastic vapour, can be got from brimstone, or any oil. perhaps this inflammable principle may come from some remains of the animals, from which it is thought that all calcareous matter proceeds. in the method in which i generally made the fixed air (and indeed always, unless the contrary be particularly mentioned, viz. by diluted oil of vitriol and chalk) i found by experiment that it was as pure as mr. cavendish made it. for after it had patted through a large body of water in small bubbles, still / or / part only was not absorbed by water. in order to try this as expeditiously as possible, i kept pouring the air from one glass vessel into another, immersed in a quantity of cold water, in which manner i found by experience, that almost any quantity may be reduced as far as possible in a very short time. but the most expeditious method of making water imbibe any kind of air, is to confine it in a jar; and agitate it strongly, in the manner described in my pamphlet on the impregnation of water with fixed air, and represented fig. . at the same time that i was trying the purity of my fixed air, i had the curiosity to endeavour to ascertain whether that part of it which is not miscible in water, be equally diffused through the whole mass; and, for this purpose, i divided a quantity of about a gallon into three parts, the first consisting of that which was uppermost, and the last of that which was the lowest, contiguous to the water; but all these parts were reduced in about an equal proportion, by passing through the water, so that the whole mass had been of an uniform composition. this i have also found to be the case with several kinds of air, which will, not properly incorporate. a mouse will live very well, though a candle will not burn in the residuum of the purest fixed air that i can make; and i once made a very large quantity for the sole purpose of this experiment. this, therefore, seems to be one instance of the generation of genuine common air, though vitiated in some degree. it is also another proof of the residuum of fixed air being, in part at least, common air, that it becomes turbid, and is diminished by the mixture of nitrous air, as will be explained hereafter. that fixed air only wants some addition to make it permanent, and immiscible with water if not in all respects, common air, i have been led to conclude, from several attempts which i once made to mix it with air in which a quantity of iron filings and brimstone, made into a paste with water, had stood; for, in several mixtures of this kind, i imagined that not much more than half of the fixed air could be imbibed by water; but, not being able to repeat the experiment, i conclude that i either deceived myself in it, or that i overlooked some circumstance on which the success of it depended. these experiments, however, whether they were fallacious or otherwise, induced me to try whether any alteration would be made in the constitution of fixed air, by this mixture of iron filings and brimstone. i therefore put a mixture of this kind into a quantity of as pure fixed air as i could make, and confined the whole in quicksilver, lest the water should absorb it before the effects of the mixture could take place. the consequence was, that the fixed air was diminished, and the quicksilver rose in the vessel, till about the fifth part was occupied by it; and, as near as i could judge, the process went on, in all respects, as if the air in the inside had been common air. what is most remarkable, in the result of this experiment, is, that the fixed air, into which this mixture had been put, and which had been in part diminished by it, was in part also rendered insoluble in water by this means. i made this experiment four times, with the greatest care, and observed, that in two of them about one sixth, and in the other two about one fourteenth, of the original quantity, was such as could not be absorbed by water, but continued permanently elastic. lest i should have made any mistake with respect to the purity of the fixed air, the last time that i made the experiment, i set part of the fixed air, which i made use of, in a separate vessel, and found it to be exceedingly pure, so as to be almost wholly absorbed by water; whereas the other part, to which i had put the mixture, was far from being so. in one of these cases, in which fixed air was made immiscible with water, it appeared to be not very noxious to animals; but in another case, a mouse died in it pretty soon. this difference probably arose from my having inadvertently agitated the air in water rather more in one case than in the other. as the iron is reduced to a calx by this process, i once concluded, that it is phlogiston that fixed air wants, to make it common air; and, for any thing i yet know this may be the case, though i am ignorant of the method of combining them; and when i calcined a quantity of lead in fixed air, in the manner which will be described hereafter, it did not seem to have been less soluble in water than it was before. footnotes: [ ] an account of mr. hey's experiments will be found in the appendix to these papers. section ii. _of air in which a candle, or brimstone, has burned out._ it is well known that flame cannot subsist long without change of air, so that the common air is necessary to it, except in the case of substances, into the composition of which nitre enters, for these will burn _in vacuo_, in fixed air, and even under water, as is evident in some rockets, which are made for this purpose. the quantity of air which even a small flame requires to keep it burning is prodigious. it is generally said, that an ordinary candle _consumes_, as it is called, about a gallon in a minute. considering this amazing consumption of air, by fires of all kinds, volcanos, &c. it becomes a great object of philosophical inquiry, to ascertain what change is made in the constitution of the air by flame, and to discover what provision there is in nature for remedying the injury which the atmosphere receives by this means. some of the following experiments will, perhaps, be thought to throw light upon the subject. the diminution of the quantity of air in which a candle, or brimstone, has burned out, is various; but i imagine that, at a medium, it may be about one fifteenth, or one sixteenth of the whole; which is one third as much as by animal or vegetable substances putrefying in it, by the calcination of metals, or by any of the other causes of the complete diminution of air, which will be mentioned hereafter. i have sometimes thought, that flame disposes the common air to deposit the fixed air it contains; for if any lime-water be exposed to it, it immediately becomes turbid. this is the case, when wax candles, tallow candles, chips of wood, spirit of wine, ether, and every other substance which i have yet tried, except brimstone, is burned in a close glass vessel, standing in lime-water. this precipitation of fixed air (if this be the case) may be owing to something emitted from the burning bodies, which has a stronger affinity with the other constituent parts of the atmosphere[ ]. if brimstone be burned in the same circumstances, the lime-water continues transparent, but still there may have been the same precipitation of the fixed part of the air; but that, uniting with the lime and the vitriolic acid, it forms a selenetic salt, which is soluble in water. having evaporated a quantity of water thus impregnated, by burning brimstone a great number of times over it, a whitish powder remained, which had an acid taste; but repeating the experiment with a quicker evaporation, the powder had no acidity, but was very much like chalk. the burning of brimstone but once over a quantity of lime-water, will affect it in such a manner, that breathing into it will not make it turbid, which otherwise it always presently does. dr. hales supposed, that by burning brimstone repeatedly in the same quantity of air, the diminution would continue without end. but this i have frequently tried, and not found to be the case. indeed, when the ignition has been imperfect in the first instance, a second firing of the same substance will increase the effect of the first, &c. but this progress soon ceases. in many cases of the diminution of air, the effect is not immediately apparent, even when it stands in water; for sometimes the bulk of air will not be much reduced, till it has passed several times through a quantity of water, which has thereby a better opportunity of absorbing that part of the air, which had not been perfectly detatched from the rest. i have sometimes found a very great reduction of a mass of air, in consequence of passing but once through cold water. if the air has stood in quicksilver, the diminution is generally inconsiderable, till it has undergone this operation, there not being any substance exposed to the air that could absorb any part of it. i could not find any considerable alteration in the specific gravity of the air, in which candles, or brimstone, had burned out. i am satisfied, however, that it is not heavier than common air, which must have been manifest, if so great a diminution of the quantity had been owing, as dr. hales and others supposed, to the elasticity of the whole mass being impaired. after making several trials for this purpose, i concluded that air, thus diminished in bulk, is rather lighter than common air, which favours the supposition of the fixed, or heavier part of the common air, having been precipitated. an animal will live nearly, if not quite as long, in air in which candles have burned out, as in common air. this fact surprized me very greatly, having imagined that what is called the _consumption_ of air by flame, or respiration, to have been of the same nature, and in the same degree; but i have since found, that this fact has been observed by many persons, and even so early as by mr. boyle. i have also observed, that air, in which brimstone has burned, is not in the least injurious to animals, after the fumes, which at first make it very cloudy, have intirely subsided. i must, in this place, admonish my reader not to confound the simple _burning of brimstone_, or of matches (_i. e._ bits of wood dipped in it) and the burning of brimstone with a burning mirror, or any _foreign heat_. the effect of the former is nothing more than that of any other _flame_, or _ignited vapour_, which will not burn, unless the air with which it is surrounded be in a very pure state, and which is therefore extinguished when the air begins to be much vitiated. lighted brimstone, therefore reduces the air to the same state as lighted wood. but the focus of a burning mirror thrown for a sufficient time either upon brimstone, or wood, after it has ceased to burn of its own accord, and has become _charcoal_, will have a much greater effect: of the same kind, diminishing the air to its utmost extent, and making it thoroughly noxious. in fact, as will be seen hereafter, more phlogiston is expelled from these substances in the latter case than in the former. i never, indeed, actually carried this experiment so far with brimstone; but from the diminution of air that i did produce by this means, i concluded that, by continuing the process some time longer, it would have been effected. having read, in the memoirs of the philosophical society at turin, vol. i. p. . that air in which candles had burned out was perfectly restored, so that other candles would burn in it again as well as ever, after having been exposed to a considerable degree of _cold_, and likewise after having been compressed in bladders, (for the cold had been supposed to have produced this effect by nothing but _condensation_) i repeated those experiments, and did, indeed, find, that when i compressed the air in _bladders_, as the count de saluce, who made the observation, had done, the experiment succeeded: but having had sufficient reason to distrust bladders, i compressed the air in a glass vessel standing in water; and then i found, that this process is altogether ineffectual for the purpose. i kept the air compressed much more, and much longer, than the count had done, but without producing any alteration in it. i also find, that a greater degree of cold than that which he applied, and of longer continuance, did by no means restore this kind of air: for when i had exposed the phials which contained it a whole night, in which the frost was very intense; and also when i kept it surrounded with a mixture of snow and salt, i found it, in all respects, the same as before. it is also advanced, in the same memoir, p. . that _heat_ only, as the reverse of _cold_, renders air unfit for candles burning in it. but i repeated the experiment of the count for that purpose, without finding any such effect from it. i also remember that, many years ago, i filled an exhausted receiver with air, which had passed through a glass tube made red-hot, and found that a candle would burn in it perfectly well. also, rarefaction by the air-pump does not injure air in the least degree. though this experiment failed, i have been so happy, as by accident to have hit upon a method of restoring air, which has been injured by the burning of candles, and to have discovered at least one of the restoratives which nature employs for this purpose. it is _vegetation_. this restoration of vitiated air, i conjecture, is effected by plants imbibing the phlogistic matter with which it is overloaded by the burning of inflammable bodies. but whether there be any foundation for this conjecture or not, the fact is, i think, indisputable. i shall introduce the account of my experiments on this subject, by reciting some of the observations which i made on the growing of plants in confined air, which led to this discovery. one might have imagined that, since common air is necessary to vegetable, as well as to animal life, both plants and animals had affected it in the same manner; and i own i had that expectation, when i first put a sprig of mint into a glass jar, standing inverted in a vessel of water: but when it had continued growing there for some months, i found that the air would neither extinguish a candle, nor was it at all inconvenient to a mouse, which i put into it. the plant was not affected any otherwise than was the necessary consequence of its confined situation; for plants growing in several other kinds of air, were all affected in the very same manner. every succession of leaves was more diminished in size than the preceding, till, at length, they came to be no bigger than the heads of pretty small pins. the root decayed, and the stalk also, beginning from the root; and yet the plant continued to grow upwards, drawing its nourishment through a black and rotten stem. in the third or fourth set of leaves, long and white hairy filaments grew from the insertion of each leaf and sometimes from the body of the stem, shooting out as far as the vessel in which it grew would permit, which, in my experiments, was about two inches. in this manner a sprig of mint lived, the old plant decaying, and new ones shooting up in its place, but less and less continually, all the summer season. in repeating this experiment, care must be taken to draw away all the dead leaves from about the plant, lest they should putrefy, and affect the air. i have found that a fresh cabbage leaf, put under a glass vessel filled with common air, for the space of one night only, has so affected the air, that a candle would not burn in it the next morning, and yet the leaf had not acquired any smell of putrefaction. finding that candles would burn very well in air in which plants had grown a long time, and having had some reason to think, that there was something attending vegetation, which restored air that had been injured by respiration, i thought it was possible that the same process might also restore the air that had been injured by the burning of candles. accordingly, on the th of august , i put a sprig of mint into a quantity of air, in which a wax candle had burned out, and found that, on the th of the same month, another candle burned perfectly well in it. this experiment i repeated, without the least variation in the event, not less than eight or ten times in the remainder of the summer. several times i divided the quantity of air in which the candle had burned out, into two parts, and putting the plant into one of them, left the other in the same exposure, contained, also, in a glass vessel immersed in water, but without any plant; and never failed to find, that a candle would burn in the former, but not in the latter. i generally found that five or six days were sufficient to restore this air, when the plant was in its vigour; whereas i have kept this kind of air in glass vessels, immersed in water many months, without being able to perceive that the least alteration had been made in it. i have also tried a great variety of experiments upon it, as by condensing, rarefying, exposing to the light and heat, &c. and throwing into it the effluvia of many different substances, but without any effect. experiments made in the year , abundantly confirmed my conclusion concerning the restoration of air, in which candles had burned out by plants growing in it. the first of these experiments was made in the month of may; and they were frequently repeated in that and the two following months, without a single failure. for this purpose i used the flames of different substances, though i generally used wax or tallow candles. on the th of june the experiment succeeded perfectly well with air in which spirit of wine had burned out, and on the th of the same month it succeeded equally well with air in which brimstone matches had burned out, an effect of which i had despaired the preceding year. this restoration of air, i found, depended upon the _vegetating state_ of the plant; for though i kept a great number of the fresh leaves of mint in a small quantity of air in which candles had burned out, and changed them frequently, for a long space of time, i could perceive no melioration in the state of the air. this remarkable effect does not depend upon any thing peculiar to _mint_, which was the plant that i always made use of till july ; for on the th of that month, i found a quantity of this kind of air to be perfectly restored by sprigs of _balm_, which had grown in it from the th of the same month. that this restoration of air was not owing to any _aromatic effluvia_ of these two plants, not only appeared by the _essential oil of mint_ having no sensible effect of this kind; but from the equally complete restoration of this vitiated air by the plant called _groundsel_, which is usually ranked among the weeds, and has an offensive smell. this was the result of an experiment made the th of july, when the plant had been growing in the burned air from the th of the same month. besides, the plant which i have found to be the most effectual of any that i have tried for this purpose is _spinach_, which is of quick growth, but will seldom thrive long in water. one jar of burned air was perfectly restored by this plant in four days, and another in two days. this last was observed on the d of july. in general, this effect may be presumed to have taken place in much less time than i have mentioned; because i never chose to make a trial of the air, till i was pretty sure, from preceding observations, that the event which i had expected must have taken place, if it would succeed at all; lest, returning back that part of the air on which i made the trial, and which would thereby necessarily receive a small mixture of common air, the experiment might not be judged to be quite fair; though i myself might be sufficiently satisfied with respect to the allowance that was to be made for that small imperfection. footnotes: [ ] the supposition, mentioned in this and other passages of the first part of this publication, viz. that the diminution of common air, by this and other processes is, in part at least, owing to the precipitation of the fixed air from it, the reader will find confirmed by the experiments and observations in the second part. section iii. _of inflammable air._ i have generally made inflammable air in the manner described by mr. cavendish, in the philosophical transactions, from iron, zinc, or tin; but chiefly from the two former metals, on account of the process being the least troublesome: but when i extracted it from vegetable or animal substances, or from coals, i put them into a gun-barrel, to the orifice of which i luted a glass tube, or the stem of a tobacco-pipe, and to the end of this i tied a flaccid bladder in order to catch the generated air; or i received the air in a vessel of quicksilver, in the manner represented fig. . there is not, i believe, any vegetable or animal substance whatever, nor any mineral substance, that is inflammable, but what will yield great plenty of inflammable air, when they are treated in this manner, and urged with a strong heat; but, in order to get the most air, the heat must be applied as suddenly, and as vehemently, as possible. for, notwithstanding the same care be taken in luting, and in every other respect, six or even ten times more air may be got by a sudden heat than by a slow one, though the heat that is last applied be as intense as that which was applied suddenly. a bit of dry oak, weighing about twelve grains, will generally yield about a sheep's bladder full of inflammable air with a brisk heat, when it will only give about two or three ounce measures, if the same heat be applied to it very gradually. to what this difference is owing, i cannot tell. perhaps the phlogiston being extricated more slowly may not be intirely expelled, but form another kind of union with its base; so that charcoal made with a heat slowly applied shall contain more phlogiston than that which is made with a sudden heat. it may be worth while to examine the properties of the charcoal with this view. inflammable air, when it is made by a quick process, has a very strong and offensive smell, from whatever substance it be generated; but this smell is of three different kinds, according as the air is extracted from mineral, vegetable, or animal substances. the last is exceedingly fetid; and it makes no difference, whether it be extracted from a bone, or even an old and dry tooth, from soft muscular flesh; or any other part of the animal. the burning of any substance occasions the same smell: for the gross fume which arises from them, before they flame, is the inflammable air they contain, which is expelled by heat, and then readily ignited. the smell of inflammable air is the very same, as far as i am able to perceive, from whatever substance of the same kingdom it be extracted. thus it makes no difference whether it be got from iron, zinc, or tin, from any kind of wood, or, as was observed before, from any part of an animal. if a quantity of inflammable air be contained in a glass vessel standing in water, and have been generated very fast, it will smell even through the water, and this water will also soon become covered with a thin film, assuming all the different colours. if the inflammable air have been generated from iron, this matter will appear to be a red okre, or the earth of iron, as i have found by collecting a considerable quantity of it; and if it have been generated from zinc, it is a whitish substance, which i suppose to be the calx of the metal. it likewise settles to the bottom of the vessel, and when the water is stirred, it has very much the appearance of wool. when water is once impregnated in this manner, it will continue to yield this scum for a considerable time after the air is removed from it. this i have often observed with respect to iron. inflammable air, made by a violent effervescence, i have observed to be much more inflammable than that which is made by a weak effervescence, whether the water or the oil of vitriol prevailed in the mixture. also the offensive smell was much stronger in the former case than in the latter. the greater degree of inflammability appeared by the greater number of successive explosions, when a candle was presented to the neck of a phial filled with it.[ ] it is possible, however, that this diminution of inflammability may, in some measure, arise from the air continuing so much longer in the bladder when it is made very slowly; though i think the difference is too great for this cause to have produced the whole of it. it may, perhaps, deserve to be tried by a different process, without a bladder. inflammable air is not thought to be miscible with water, and when kept many months, seems, in general, to be as inflammable as ever. indeed, when it is extracted from vegetable or animal substances, a part of it will be imbibed by the water in which it stands; but it may be presumed, that in this case, there was a mixture of fixed air extracted from the substance along with it. i have indisputable evidence, however, that inflammable air, standing long in water, has actually lost all its inflammability, and even come to extinguish flame much more than that air in which candles have burned out. after this change it appears to be greatly diminished in quantity, and it still continues to kill animals the moment they are put into it. this very remarkable fact first occurred to my observation on the twenty-fifth of may , when i was examining a quantity of inflammable air, which had been made from zinc, near three years before. upon this, i immediately set by a common quart-bottle filled with inflammable air from iron, and another equal quantity from zinc; and examining them in the beginning of december following, that from the iron was reduced near one half in quantity, if i be not greatly mistaken; for i found the bottle half full of water, and i am pretty clear that it was full of air when it was set by. that which had been produced from zinc was not altered, and filled the bottle as at first. another instance of this kind occurred to my observation on the th of june , when a quantity of air, half of which had been inflammable air from zinc, and half air in which mice had died, and which had been put together the th of july , appeared not to be in the least inflammable, but extinguished flame, as much as any kind of air that i had ever tried. i think that, in all, i have had four instances of inflammable air losing its inflammability, while it stood in water. though air tainted with putrefaction extinguishes flame, i have not found that animals or vegetables putrefying in inflammable air render it less inflammable. but one quantity of inflammable air, which i had set by in may , along with the others above mentioned, had had some putrid flesh in it; and this air had lost its inflammability, when it was examined at the same time with the other in the december following. the bottle in which this air had been kept, smelled exactly like very strong harrogate water. i do not think that any person could have distinguished them. i have made plants grow for several months in inflammable air made from zinc, and also from oak; but, though the plants grew pretty well, the air still continued inflammable. the former, indeed, was not so highly inflammable as when it was fresh made, but the latter was quite as much so; and the diminution of inflammability in the former case, i attribute to some other cause than the growth of the plant. no kind of air, on which i have yet made the experiment, will conduct electricity; but the colour of an electric spark is remarkably different in some different kinds of air, which seems to shew that they are not equally good non-conductors. in fixed air, the electric spark is exceedingly white; but in inflammable air it is of a purple, or red colour. now, since the most vigorous sparks are always the whitest, and, in other cases, when the spark is red, there is reason to think that the electric matter passes with difficulty, and with less rapidity: it is possible that the inflammable air may contain particles which conduct electricity, though very imperfectly; and that the whiteness of the spark in the fixed air, may be owing to its meeting with no conducting particles at all. when an explosion was made in a quantity of inflammable air, it was a little white in the center, but the edges of it were still tinged with a beautiful purple. the degree of whiteness in this case was probably owing to the electric matter rushing with more violence in an explosion than in a common spark. inflammable air kills animals as suddenly as fixed air, and, as far as can be perceived, in the same manner, throwing them into convulsions, and thereby occasioning present death. i had imagined that, by animals dying in a quantity of inflammable air, it would in time become less noxious; but this did not appear to be the case; for i killed great number of mice in a small quantity of this air; which i kept several months for this purpose, without its being at all sensibly mended; the last, as well as the first mouse, dying the moment it was put into it. i once imagined that, since fixed and inflammable air are the reverse of one another, in several remarkable properties, a mixture of them would make common air; and while i made the mixtures in bladders, i imagined that i had succeeded in my attempt; but i have since found that thin bladders do not sufficiently prevent the air that is contained in them from mixing with the external air. also corks will not sufficiently confine different kinds of air, unless the phials in which they are confined be set with their mouths downwards, and a little water lie in the necks of them, which, indeed, is equivalent to the air standing in vessels immersed in water. in this manner, however, i have kept different kinds of air for several years. whatever methods i took to promote the mixture of fixed and inflammable air, they were all ineffectual. i think it my duty, however, to recite the issue of an experiment or two of this kind, in which equal mixtures of these two kinds of air had stood near three years, as they seem to shew that they had in part affected one another, in that long space of time. these mixtures i examined april , . one of them had stood in quicksilver, and the other in a corked phial, with a little water in it. on opening the latter in water, the water instantly rushed in, and filled almost half of the phial, and very little more was absorbed afterwards. in this case the water in the phial had probably absorbed a considerable part of the fixed air, so that the inflammable air was exceedingly rarefied; and yet the whole quantity that must have been rendered non-elastic was ten times more than the bulk of the water, and it has not been found that water can contain much more than its own bulk of fixed air. but in other cases i have found the diminution of a quantity of air, and especially of fixed air, to be much greater than i could well account for by any kind of absorption. the phial which had stood immersed in quicksilver had lost very little of its original quantity of air; and being now opened in water, and left there, along with another phial, which was just then filled, as this had been three years before, viz. with air half inflammable and half fixed, i observed that the quantity of both was diminished, by the absorption of the water, in the same proportion. upon applying a candle to the mouths of the phials which had been kept three years, that which had stood in quicksilver went off at one explosion, exactly as it would have done if there had been a mixture of common air with the inflammable. as a good deal depends upon the apertures of the vessels in which the inflammable air is mixed, i mixed the two kinds of air in equal proportions in the same phial, and after letting the phial stand some days in water, that the fixed air might be absorbed, i applied a candle to it, but it made ten or twelve explosions (stopping the phial after each of them) before the inflammable matter was exhausted. the air which had been confined in the corked phial exploded in the very same manner as an equal and fresh mixture of the two kinds of air in the same phial, the experiment being made as soon as the fixed air was absorbed, as before; so that in this case, the two kinds of air did not seem to have affected one another at all. considering inflammable air as air united to, or loaded with phlogiston, i exposed to it several substances, which are said to have a near affinity with phlogiston, as oil of vitriol, and spirit of nitre (the former for above a month), but without making any sensible alteration in it. i observed, however, that inflammable air, mixed with the fumes of smoking spirit of nitre, goes off at one explosion, exactly like a mixture of half common and half inflammable air. this i tried several times, by throwing the inflammable air into a phial full of spirit of nitre, with its mouth immersed in a bason containing some of the same spirit, and then applying the flame of a candle to the mouth of the phial, the moment that it was uncovered, after it had been taken out of the bason. this remarkable effect i hastily concluded to have arisen from the inflammable air having been in part deprived of its inflammability, by means of the stronger affinity, which the spirit of nitre had with phlogiston, and therefore i imagined that by letting them stand longer in contact, and especially by agitating them strongly together, i should deprive the air of all its inflammability; but neither of these operations succeeded, for still the air was only exploded at once, as before. and lastly, when i passed a quantity of inflammable air, which had been mixed with the fumes of spirit of nitre, through a body of water, and received it in another vessel, it appeared not to have undergone any change at all, for it went off in several successive explosions, like the purest inflammable air. the effect above-mentioned must, therefore, have been owing to the fumes of the spirit of nitre supplying the place of common air for the purpose of ignition, which is analogous to other experiments with nitre. having had the curiosity, on the th of july , to expose a great variety of different kinds of air to water out of which the air it contained had been boiled, without any particular view; the result was, in several respects, altogether unexpected, and led to a variety of new observations on the properties and affinities of several kinds of air with respect to water. among the rest three fourths of that which was inflammable was absorbed by the water in about two days, and the remainder was inflammable, but weakly so. upon this, i began to agitate a quantity of strong inflammable air in a glass jar, standing in a pretty large trough of water, the surface of which was exposed to the common air, and i found that when i had continued the operation about ten minutes, near one fourth of the quantity of air had disappeared; and finding that the remainder made an effervescence with nitrous air, i concluded that it must have become fit for respiration, whereas this kind of air is, at the first, as noxious as any other kind whatever. to ascertain this, i put a mouse into a vessel containing - / ounce measures of it, and observed that it lived in it twenty minutes, which is as long as a mouse will generally live in the same quantity of common air. this mouse was even taken out alive, and recovered very well. still also the air in which it had breathed so long was inflammable, though very weakly so. i have even found it to be so when a mouse has actually died in it. inflammable air thus diminished by agitation in water, makes but one explosion on the approach of a candle, exactly like a mixture of inflammable air with common air. from this experiment i concluded that, by continuing the same process, i should deprive inflammable air of all its inflammability, and this i found to be the case; for, after a longer agitation, it admitted a candle to burn in it, like common air, only more faintly; and indeed by the test of nitrous air it did not appear to be near so good as common air. continuing the same process still farther, the air which had been most strongly inflammable a little before, came to extinguish a candle, exactly like air in which a candle had burned out, nor could they be distinguished by the test of nitrous air. i found, by repeated trials, that it was difficult to catch the time in which inflammable air obtained from metals, in coming to extinguish flame, was in the state of common air, so that the transition from the one to the other must be very short. indeed i think that in many, perhaps in most cases, there may be no proper medium at all, the phlogiston passing at once from that mode of union with its base which constitutes inflammable air, to that which constitutes an air that extinguishes flame, being so much overloaded as to admit of no more. i readily, however, found this middle state in a quantity of inflammable air extracted from oak, which air i had kept a year, and in which a plant had grown, though very poorly, for some part of the time. a quantity of this air, after being agitated in water till it was diminished about one half, admitted a candle to burn in it exceedingly well, and was even hardly to be distinguished from common air by the test of nitrous air. i took some pains to ascertain the quantity of diminution, in fresh made and very highly-inflammable air from iron, at which it ceased to be inflammable, and, upon the whole, i concluded that it was so when it was diminished a little more than one half; for a quantity which was diminished exactly one half had something inflammable in it, but in the slightest degree imaginable. it is not improbable, however, but there may be great differences in the result of this experiment. finding that water would imbibe inflammable air, i endeavoured to impregnate water with it, by the same process by which i had made water imbibe fixed air; but though i found that distilled water would imbibe about one fourteenth of its bulk of inflammable air, i could not perceive that the taste of it was sensibly altered. footnotes: [ ] to try this, after every explosion, which immediately follows the presenting of the flame, the mouth of the phial should be closed (i generally do it with a finger of the hand in which i hold the phial) for otherwise the inflammable air will continue burning, though invisibly in the day time, till the whole be consumed. section iv. _of air infected with animal respiration, or putrefaction._ that candles will burn only a certain time, in a given quantity of air is a fact not better known, than it is that animals can live only a certain time in it; but the cause of the death of the animal is not better known than that of the extinction of flame in the same circumstances; and when once any quantity of air has been rendered noxious by animals breathing in it as long as they could, i do not know that any methods have been discovered of rendering it fit for breathing again. it is evident, however, that there must be some provision in nature for this purpose, as well as for that of rendering the air fit for sustaining flame; for without it the whole mass of the atmosphere would, in time, become unfit for the purpose of animal life; and yet there is no reason to think that it is, at present, at all less fit for respiration than it has ever been. i flatter myself, however, that i have hit upon two of the methods employed by nature for this great purpose. how many others there may be, i cannot tell. when animals die upon being put into air in which other animals have died, after breathing in it as long as they could, it is plain that the cause of their death is not the want of any _pabulum vitæ,_ which has been supposed to be contained in the air, but on account of the air being impregnated with something stimulating to their lungs; for they almost always die in convulsions, and are sometimes affected so suddenly, that they are irrecoverable after a single inspiration, though they be withdrawn immediately, and every method has been taken to bring them to life again. they are affected in the same manner, when they are killed in any other kind of noxious air that i have tried, viz. fixed air, inflammable air, air filled with the fumes of brimstone, infected with putrid matter, in which a mixture of iron filings and brimstone has stood, or in which charcoal has been burned, or metals calcined, or in nitrous air, &c. as it is known that _convulsions_ weaken, and exhaust the vital powers, much more than the most vigorous _voluntary_ action of the muscles, perhaps these universal convulsions may exhaust the whole of what we may call the _vis vitæ_ at once, at least that the lungs may be rendered absolutely incapable of action, till the animal be suffocated, or be irrecoverable for want of respiration. if a mouse (which is an animal that i have commonly made use of for the purpose of these experiments) can stand the first shock of this stimulus, or has been habituated to it by degrees, it will live a considerable time in air in which other mice will die instantaneously. i have frequently found that when a number of mice have been confined in a given quantity of air, less than half the time that they have actually lived in it, a fresh mouse being introduced to them has been instantly thrown into convulsions, and died. it is evident, therefore, that if the experiment of the black hole were to be repeated, a man would stand the better chance of surviving it, who should enter at the first, than at the last hour. i have also observed, that young mice will always live much longer than old ones, or than those which are full grown, when they are confined in the same quantity of air. i have sometimes known a young mouse to live six hours in the same circumstances in which an old mouse has not lived one. on these accounts, experiments with mice, and, for the same reason, no doubt, with other animals also, have a considerable degree of uncertainty attending them; and therefore, it is necessary to repeat them frequently, before the result can be absolutely depended upon. but every person of feeling will rejoice with me in the discovery of _nitrous air_, to be mentioned hereafter, which supersedes many experiments with the respiration of animals, being a much more accurate test of the purity of air. the discovery of the provision in nature for restoring air, which has been injured by the respiration of animals, having long appeared to me to be one of the most important problems in natural philosophy, i have tried a great variety of schemes in order to effect it. in these my guide has generally been to consider the influences to which the atmosphere is, in fact, exposed; and, as some of my unsuccessful trials may be of use to those who are disposed to take pains in the farther investigation of this subject, i shall mention the principal of them. the noxious effluvium with which air is loaded by animal respiration, is not absorbed by standing, without agitation; in fresh or salt water. i have kept it many months in fresh water, when, instead of being meliorated, it has seemed to become even more deadly, so as to require more time to restore it, by the methods which will be explained hereafter, than air which has been lately made noxious. i have even spent several hours in pouring this air from one glass vessel into another, in water, sometimes as cold, and sometimes as warm, as my hands could bear it, and have sometimes also wiped the vessels many times, during the course of the experiment, in order to take off that part of the noxious matter, which might adhere to the glass vessels, and which evidently gave them an offensive smell; but all these methods were generally without any sensible effect. the _motion_, also, which the air received in these circumstances, it is very evident, was of no use for this purpose. i had not then thought of the simple, but most effectual method of agitating air in water, by putting it into a tall jar and shaking it with my hand. this kind of air is not restored by being exposed to the _light_, or by any other influence to which it is exposed, when confined in a thin phial, in the open air, for some months. among other experiments, i tried a great variety of different _effluvia_, which are continually exhaling into the air, especially of those substances which are known to resist putrefaction; but i could not by these means effect any melioration of the noxious quality of this kind of air. having read, in the memoirs of the imperial society, of a plague not affecting a particular village, in which there was a large sulphur-work, i immediately fumigated a quantity of this kind of air; or (which will hereafter appear to be the very same thing) air tainted with putrefaction, with the fumes of burning brimstone, but without any effect. i once imagined, that the _nitrous acid_ in the air might be the general restorative which i was in quest of; and the conjecture was favoured, by finding that candles would burn in air extracted from saltpetre. i therefore spent a good deal of time in attempting, by a burning glass, and other means, to impregnate this noxious air, with some effluvium of saltpetre, and, with the same view, introduced into it the fumes of the smoaking spirit of nitre; but both these methods were altogether ineffectual. in order to try the effect of _heat_, i put a quantity of air, in which mice had died, into a bladder, tied to the end of the stem of a tobacco-pipe, at the other end of which was another bladder, out of which the air was carefully pressed. i then put the middle part of the stem into a chafing-dish of hot coals, strongly urged with a pair of bellows; and, pressing the bladders alternately, i made the air pass several times through the heated part of the pipe. i have also made this kind of air very hot, standing in water before the fire. but neither of these methods were of any use. _rarefaction_ and _condensation_ by instruments were also tried, but in vain. thinking it possible that the _earth_ might imbibe the noxious quality of the air, and thence supply the roots of plants with such putrescent matter as is known to be nutritive to them, i kept a quantity of air, in which mice had died, in a phial, one half of which was filled with fine garden-mould; but, though it stood two months in these circumstances, it was not the better for it. i once imagined that, since several kinds of air cannot be long separated from common air, by being confined in bladders, in bottles well corked; or even closed with ground stopples, the affinity between this noxious air and the common air might be so great, that they would mix through a body of water interposed between them; the water continually receiving from the one, and giving to the other, especially as water receives some kind of impregnation from, i believe, every kind of air to which it is contiguous; but i have seen no reason to conclude, that a mixture of any kind of air with the common air can be produced in this manner. i have kept air in which mice have died, air in which candles have burned out, and inflammable air, separated from the common air, by the slightest partition of water that i could well make, so that it might not evaporate in a day or two, if i should happen not to attend to them; but i found no change in them after a month or six weeks. the inflammable air was still inflammable, mice died instantly in the air in which other mice had died before, and candles would not burn where they had burned out before. since air tainted with animal or vegetable putrefaction is the same thing with air rendered noxious by animal respiration, i shall now recite the observations which i have made upon this kind of air, before i treat of the method of restoring them. that these two kinds of air are, in fact, the same thing, i conclude from their having several remarkable common properties, and from their differing in nothing that i have been able to observe. they equally extinguish flame, they are equally noxious to animals, they are equally, and in the same way, offensive to the smell, and they are restored by the same means. since air which has passed through the lungs is the same thing with air tainted with animal putrefaction, it is probable that one use of the lungs is to carry off a _putrid effluvium_, without which, perhaps, a living body might putrefy as soon as a dead one. when a mouse putrefies in any given quantity of air, the bulk of it is generally increased for a few days; but in a few days more it begins to shrink up, and in about eight or ten days, if the weather be pretty warm, it will be found to be diminished / , or / of its bulk. if it do not appear to be diminished after this time, it only requires to be passed through water, and the diminution will not fail to be sensible. i have sometimes known almost the whole diminution to take place, upon once or twice passing through the water. the same is the case with air, in which animals have breathed as long as they could. also, air in which candles have burned out may almost always be farther reduced by this means. all these processes, as i observed before, seem to dispose the compound mass of air to part with some constituent part belonging to it (which appears to be the _fixed air_ that enters into its constitution) and this being miscible with water, must be brought into contact with it, in order to mix with it to the most advantage, especially when its union with the other constituent principles of the air is but partially broken. i have put mice into vessels which had their mouths immersed in quicksilver, and observed that the air was not much contracted after they were dead or cold; but upon withdrawing the mice, and admitting lime water to the air, it immediately became turbid, and was contracted in its dimensions as usual. i tried the same thing with air tainted with putrefaction, putting a dead mouse to a quantity of common air, in a vessel which had its mouth immersed in quicksilver, and after a week i took the mouse out, drawing it through the quicksilver, and observed that, for some time, there was an apparent increase of the air perhaps about / . after this, it stood two days in the quicksilver, without any sensible alteration; and then admitting water to it, it began to be absorbed, and continued so, till the original quantity was diminished about / . if, instead of common water, i had made use of lime-water in this experiment, i make no doubt but it would have become turbid. if a quantity of lime-water in a phial be put under a glass vessel standing in water, it will not become turbid, and provided the access of the common air be prevented, it will continue lime-water, i do not know how long; but if a mouse be left to putrefy in the vessel, the water will deposit all its lime in a few days. this is owing to the fixed air deposited by the common air, and perhaps also from more fixed air discharged from the putrefying substances in some part of the process of putrefaction. the air that is discharged from putrefying substances seems, in some cases, to be chiefly fixed air, with the addition of some other effluvium, which has the power of diminishing common air. the resemblance between the true putrid effluvium and fixed air in the following experiment, which is as decisive as i can possibly contrive it, appeared to be very great; indeed much greater than i had expected. i put a dead mouse into a tall glass vessel, and having filled the remainder with quicksilver, and set it, inverted, in a pot of quicksilver, i let it stand about two months, in which time the putrid effluvium issuing from the mouse had filled the whole vessel, and part of the dissolved blood, which lodged upon the surface of the quicksilver, began to be thrown out. i then filled another glass vessel, of the same size and shape, with as pure fixed air as i could make, and exposed them both, at the same time, to a quantity of lime-water. in both cases the water grew turbid alike, it rose equally fast in both the vessels, and likewise equally high; so that about the same quantity remained unabsorbed by the water. one of these kinds of air, however, was exceedingly sweet and pleasant, and the other insufferably offensive; one of them also would have made an addition to any quantity of common air, with which it had been mixed, and the other would have diminished it. this, at least, would have been the consequence, if the mouse itself had putrefied in any quantity of common air. it seems to depend, in some measure, upon the _time_, and other circumstances, in the dissolution of animal or vegetable substances, whether they yield the proper putrid effluvium, or fixed, or inflammable air; but the experiments which i have made upon this subject, have not been numerous enough to enable me to decide with certainty concerning those circumstances. putrid cabbage, green or boiled, infects the air in the very same manner as putrid animal substances. air thus tainted is equally contracted in its dimensions, it equally extinguishes flame, and is equally noxious to animals; but they affect the air very differently, if the heat that is applied to them be considerable. if beef or mutton, raw or boiled, be placed so near to the fire, that the heat to which it is exposed shall equal, or rather exceed, that of the blood, a considerable quantity of air will be generated in a day or two, about / th of which i have generally found to be absorbed by water, while all the rest was inflammable; but air generated from vegetables, in the same circumstances, will be almost all fixed air, and no part of it inflammable. this i have repeated again and again, the whole process being in quicksilver; so that neither common air nor water, had any access to the substance on which the experiment was made; and the generation of air, or effluvium of any kind, except what might be absorbed by quicksilver, or resorbed by the substance itself, might be distinctly noted. a vegetable substance, after standing a day or two in these circumstances, will yield nearly all the air that can be extracted from it, in that degree of heat; whereas an animal substance will continue to give more air, or effluvium, of some kind or other, with very little alteration, for many weeks. it is remarkable, however, that though a piece of beef or mutton, plunged in quicksilver, and kept in this degree of heat, yield air, the bulk of which is inflammable, and contracts no putrid smell (at least, in a day or two) a mouse treated in the same manner, yields the proper putrid effluvium, as indeed the smell sufficiently indicates. that the putrid effluvium will mix with water seems to be evident from the following experiment. if a mouse be put into a jar full of water, standing with its mouth inverted in another vessel of water, a considerable quantity of elastic matter (and which may, therefore, be called _air_) will soon be generated, unless the weather be so cold as to check all putrefaction. after a short time, the water contracts an extremely fetid and offensive smell, which seems to indicate that the putrid effluvium pervades the water, and affects the neighbouring air; and since, after this, there is often no increase of the air, that seems to be the very substance which is carried off through the water, as fast as it is generated; and the offensive smell is a sufficient proof that it is not fixed air. for this has a very agreeable flavour, whether it be produced by fermentation, or extracted from chalk by oil of vitriol; affecting not only the mouth, but even the nostrils; with a pungency which is peculiarly pleasing to a certain degree, as any person may easily satisfy himself, who will chuse to make the experiment. if the water in which the mouse was immersed, and which is saturated with the putrid air, be changed, the greater part of the putrid air, will, in a day or two, be absorbed, though the mouse continues to yield the putrid effluvium as before; for as soon as this fresh water becomes saturated with it, it begins to be offensive to the smell, and the quantity of the putrid air upon its surface increases as before. i kept a mouse producing putrid air in this manner for the space of several months. six ounce measures of air not readily absorbed by water, appeared to have been generated from one mouse, which had been putrefying eleven days in confined air, before it was put into a jar which was quite filled with water, for the purpose of this observation. air thus generated from putrid mice standing in water, without any mixture of common air, extinguishes flame, and is noxious to animals, but not more so than common air only tainted with putrefaction. it is exceedingly difficult and tedious to collect a quantity of this putrid air, not miscible in water, so very great a proportion of what is collected being absorbed by the water in which it is kept; but what that proportion is, i have not endeavoured to ascertain. it is probably the same proportion that that part of fixed air, which is not readily absorbed by water, bears to the rest; and therefore this air, which i at first distinguished by the name of _the putrid effluvium_, is probably the same with fixed air, mixed with the phlogistic matter, which, in this and other processes, diminishes common air. though a quantity of common air be diminished by any substance putrefying in it, i have not yet found the same effect to be produced by a mixture of putrid air with common air; but, in the manner in which i have hitherto made the experiment, i was obliged to let the putrid air pass through a body of water, which might instantly absorb the phlogistic matter that diminished the common air. insects of various kinds live perfectly well in air tainted with animal or vegetable putrefaction, when a single inspiration of it would have instantly killed any other animal. i have frequently tried the experiment with flies and butterflies. the _aphides_ also will thrive as well upon plants growing in this kind of air, as in the open air. i have even been frequently obliged to take plants out of the putrid air in which they were growing, on purpose to brush away the swarms of these insects which infected them; and yet so effectually did some of them conceal themselves, and so fast did they multiply, in these circumstances, that i could seldom keep the plants quite clear of them. when air has been freshly and strongly tainted with putrefaction, so as to smell through the water, sprigs of mint have presently died, upon being put into it, their leaves turning black; but if they do not die presently, they thrive in a most surprizing manner. in no other circumstances have i ever seen vegetation so vigorous as in this kind of air, which is immediately fatal to animal life. though these plants have been crouded in jars filled with this air, every leaf has been full of life; fresh shoots have branched out in various directions, and have grown much faster than other similar plants, growing in the same exposure in common air. this observation led me to conclude, that plants, instead of affecting the air in the same manner with animal respiration, reverse the effects of breathing, and tend to keep the atmosphere sweet and wholesome, when it is become noxious, in consequence of animals either living and breathing, or dying and putrefying in it. in order to ascertain this, i took a quantity of air, made thoroughly noxious, by mice breathing and dying in it, and divided it into two parts; one of which i put into a phial immersed in water; and to the other (which was contained in a glass jar, standing in water) i put a sprig of mint. this was about the beginning of august , and after eight or nine days, i found that a mouse lived perfectly well in that part of the air, in which the sprig of mint had grown, but died the moment it was put into the other part of the same original quantity of air; and which i had kept in the very same exposure, but without any plant growing in it. this experiment i have several times repeated; sometimes using air in which animals had breathed and died, and at other times using air, tainted with vegetable or animal putrefaction; and generally with the same success. once, i let a mouse live and die in a quantity of air which had been noxious, but which had been restored by this process, and it lived nearly as long as i conjectured it might have done in an equal quantity of fresh air; but this is so exceedingly various, that it is not easy to form any judgment from it; and in this case the symptom of _difficult respiration_ seemed to begin earlier than it would have done in common air. since the plants that i made use of manifestly grow and thrive in putrid air; since putrid matter is well known to afford proper nourishment for the roots of plants; and since it is likewise certain that they receive nourishment by their leaves as well as by their roots, it seems to be exceedingly probable, that the putrid effluvium is in some measure extracted from the air, by means of the leaves of plants, and therefore that they render the remainder more fit for respiration. towards the end of the year some experiments of this kind did not answer so well as they had done before, and i had instances of the relapsing of this restored air to its former noxious state. i therefore suspended my judgment concerning the efficacy of plants to restore this kind of noxious air, till i should have an opportunity of repeating my experiments, and giving more attention to them. accordingly i resumed the experiments in the summer of the year , when i presently had the most indisputable proof of the restoration of putrid air by vegetation; and as the fact is of some importance, and the subsequent variation in the state of this kind of air is a little remarkable, i think it necessary to relate some of the facts pretty circumstantially. the air, on which i made the first experiments, was rendered exceedingly noxious by mice dying in it on the th of june. into a jar nearly filled with one part of this air, i put a sprig of mint, while i kept another part of it in a phial, in the same exposure; and on the th of the same month, and not before, i made a trial of them, by introducing a mouse into a glass vessel, containing - / ounce measures filled with each kind of air; and i noted the following facts. when the vessel was filled with the air in which the mint had grown, a very large mouse lived five minutes in it, before it began to shew any sign of uneasiness. i then took it out, and found it to be as strong and vigorous as when it was first put in; whereas in that air which had been kept in the phial only, without a plant growing in it, a younger mouse continued not longer than two or three seconds, and was taken out quite dead. it never breathed after, and was immediately motionless. after half an hour, in which time the larger mouse (which i had kept alive, that the experiment might be made on both the kinds of air with the very same animal) would have been sufficiently recruited, supposing it to have received any injury by the former experiment, was put into the same vessel of air; but though it was withdrawn again, after being in it hardly one second, it was recovered with difficulty, not being able to stir from the place for near a minute. after two days, i put the same mouse into an equal quantity of common air, and observed that it continued seven minutes without any sign of uneasiness; and being very uneasy after three minutes longer, i took it out. upon the whole, i concluded that the restored air wanted about one fourth of being as wholesome as common air. the same thing also appeared when i applied the test of nitrous air. in the seven days, in which the mint was growing in this jar of noxious air, three old shoots had extended themselves about three inches, and several new ones had made their appearance in the same time. dr. franklin and sir john pringle happened to be with me, when the plant had been three or four days in this state, and took notice of its vigorous vegetation, and remarkably healthy appearance in that confinement. on the th of the same month, a mouse lived fourteen minutes, breathing naturally all the time, and without appearing to be much uneasy, till the last two minutes, in the vessel containing two ounce measures and a half of air which had been rendered noxious, by mice breathing in it almost a year before, and which, i had found to be most highly noxious on the th of this month, a plant having grown in it, but not exceedingly well, these eleven days; on which account i had deferred making the trial so long. the restored air was affected by a mixture of nitrous air, almost as much as common air. as this putrid air was thus easily restored to a considerable degree of fitness for respiration, by plants growing in it, i was in hopes that by the same means it might in time be so much more perfectly restored, that a candle would burn in it; and for this purpose i kept plants growing in the jars which contained this air till the middle of august following, but did not take sufficient care to pull out all the old and rotten leaves. the plants, however, had grown, and looked so well upon the whole, that i had no doubt but that the air must constantly have been in a mending state; when i was exceedingly surprized to find, on the th of that month, that though the air in one of the jars had not grown worse, it was no better; and that the air in the other jar was so much worse than it had been, that a mouse would have died in it in a few seconds. it also made no effervescence with nitrous air, as it had done before. suspecting that the same plant might be capable of restoring putrid air to a certain degree only, or that plants might have a contrary tendency in some stages of their growth, i withdrew the old plant, and put a fresh one in its place; and found that, after seven days, the air was restored to its former wholesome state. this fact i consider as a very remarkable one, and well deserving of a farther investigation, as it may throw more light upon the principles of vegetation. it is not, however, a single fact; for i had several instances of the same kind in the preceding year; but it seemed so very extraordinary, that air should grow worse by the continuance of the same treatment by which it had grown better, that, whenever i observed it, i concluded that i had not taken sufficient care to satisfy myself of its previous restoration. that plants are capable of perfectly restoring air injured by respiration, may, i think, be inferred with certainty from the perfect restoration, by this means, of air which had passed through my lungs, so that a candle would burn in it again, though it had extinguished flame before, and apart of the same original quantity of air still continued to do so. of this one instance occurred in the year , a sprig of mint having grown in a jar of this kind of air, from the th of july to the th of august following; and another trial i made, with the same success, the th of july , the plant having grown in it from the th of june preceding. in this case also i found that the effect was not owing to any virtue in the leaves of mint; for i kept them constantly changed in a quantity of this kind of air, for a considerable time, without making any sensible alteration in it. these proofs of a partial restoration of air by plants in a state of vegetation, though in a confined and unnatural situation, cannot but render it highly probable, that the injury which is continually done to the atmosphere by the respiration of such a number of animals, and the putrefaction of such masses of both vegetable and animal matter, is, in part at least, repaired by the vegetable creation. and, notwithstanding the prodigious mass of air that is corrupted daily by the above-mentioned causes; yet, if we consider the immense profusion of vegetables upon the face of the earth, growing in places, suited to their nature, and consequently at full liberty to exert all their powers, both inhaling and exhaling, it can hardly be thought, but that it may be a sufficient counterbalance to it, and that the remedy is adequate to the evil. dr. franklin, who, as i have already observed, saw some of my plants in a very flourishing state, in highly noxious air, was pleased to express very great satisfaction with the result of the experiments. in his answer to the letter in which i informed him of it, he says, "that the vegetable creation should restore the air which is spoiled by the animal part of it, looks like a rational system, and seems to be of a piece with the rest. thus fire purifies water all the world over. it purifies it by distillation, when it raises it in vapours, and lets it fall in rain; and farther still by filtration, when, keeping it fluid, it suffers that rain to percolate the earth. we knew before that putrid animal substances were converted into sweet vegetables, when mixed with the earth, and applied as manure; and now, it seems, that the same putrid substances, mixed with the air, have a similar effect. the strong thriving state of your mint in putrid air seems to shew that the air is mended by taking something from it, and not by adding to it." he adds, "i hope this will give some check to the rage of destroying trees that grow near houses, which has accompanied our late improvements in gardening, from an opinion of their being unwholesome. i am certain, from long observation, that there is nothing unhealthy in the air of woods; for we americans have every where our country habitations in the midst of woods, and no people on earth enjoy better health, or are more prolific." having rendered inflammable air perfectly innoxious by continued _agitation in a trough of water_, deprived of its air, i concluded that other kinds of noxious air might be restored by the same means; and i presently found that this was the case with putrid air, even of more than a year's standing. i shall observe once for all, that this process has never failed to restore any kind of noxious air on which i have tried it, viz. air injured by respiration or putrefaction, air infected with the fumes of burning charcoal, and of calcined metals, air in which a mixture of iron filings and brimstone, that in which paint made of white lead and oil has stood, or air which has been diminished by a mixture of nitrous air. of the remarkable effect which this process has on nitrous air itself, an account will be given in its proper place. if this process be made in water deprived of air, either by the air-pump, by boiling, or by distillation, or if fresh rain-water be used, the air will always be diminished by the agitation; and this is certainly the fairest method of making the experiment. if the water be fresh pump-water, there will always be an increase of the air by agitation, the air contained in the water being set loose, and joining that which is in the jar. in this case, also, the air has never failed to be restored; but then it might be suspected that the melioration was produced by the addition of some more wholesome ingredient. as these agitations were made in jars with wide mouths, and in a trough which had a large surface exposed to the common air, i take it for granted that the noxious effluvia, whatever they be, were first imbibed by the water, and thereby transmitted to the common atmosphere. in some cases this was sufficiently indicated by the disagreeable smell which attended the operation. after i had made these experiments, i was informed that an ingenious physician and philosopher had kept a fowl alive twenty-four hours, in a quantity of air in which another fowl of the same size had not been able to live longer than an hour, by contriving to make the air, which it breathed, pass through no very large quantity of acidulated water, the surface of which was not exposed to the common air; and that even when the water was not acidulated, the fowl lived much longer than it could have done, if the air which it breathed had not been drawn through the water. as i should not have concluded that this experiment would have succeeded so well, from any observations that i had made upon the subject, i took a quantity of air in which mice had died, and agitated it very strongly, first in about five times its own quantity of distilled water, in the manner in which i had impregnated water with fixed air; but though the operation was continued a long time, it made no sensible change in the properties of the air. i also repeated the operation with pump-water, but with as little effect. in this case, however, though the air was agitated in a phial, which had a narrow neck, the surface of the water in the bason was considerably large, and exposed to the common atmosphere, which must have tended a little to favour the experiment. in order to judge more precisely of the effect of these different methods of agitating air, i transferred the very noxious air, which i had hot been able to amend in the least degree by the former method, into an open jar, standing in a trough of water; and when i had agitated it till it was diminished about one third, i found it to be better than air in which candles had burned out, as appeared by the test of the nitrous air; and a mouse lived in - / ounce measures of it a quarter of an hour, and was not sensibly affected the first ten or twelve minutes. in order to determine whether the addition of any _acid_ to the water, would make it more capable of restoring putrid air, i agitated a quantity of it in a phial containing very strong vinegar; and after that in _aqua fortis_, only half diluted with water; but by neither of these processes was the air at all mended, though the agitation was repeated, at intervals, during a whole day, and it was moreover allowed to stand in that situation all night. since, however, water in these experiments must have imbibed and retained a certain portion of the noxious effluvia, before they could be transmitted to the external air, i do not think it improbable but that the agitation of the sea and large lakes may be of some use for the purification of the atmosphere, and the putrid matter contained in water may be imbibed by aquatic plants, or be deposited in some other manner. having found, by several experiments above-mentioned that the proper putrid effluvium is something quite distinct from fixed air, and finding, by the experiments of dr. macbride, that fixed air corrects putrefaction; it occured to me, that fixed air, and air tainted with putrefaction, though equally, noxious when separate, might make a wholesome mixture, the one, correcting the other; and i was confirmed in this opinion by, i believe, not less than fifty or sixty instances, in which air, that had been made in the highest degree noxious, by respiration or putrefaction, was so far sweetened, by a mixture of about four times as much fixed air, that afterwards mice lived in it exceedingly well, and in some cases almost as long as in common air. i found it, indeed, to be more difficult to restore _old_ putrid air by this means; but i hardly ever failed to do it, when the two kinds of air had stood a long time together; by which i mean about a fortnight or three weeks. the reason why i do not absolutely conclude that the restoration of air in these cases was the effect of fixed air, is that, when i made a trial of the mixture, i sometimes agitated the two kinds of air pretty strongly together, in a trough of water, or at least passed it several times through water, from one jar to another, that the superfluous fixed air might be absorbed, not suspecting at that time that the agitation could have any other effect. but having since found that very violent, and especially long-continued agitation in water, without any mixture of fixed air, never failed to render any kind of noxious air in some measure fit for respiration (and in one particular instance the mere transferring of the air from one vessel to another through the water, though for a much longer time than i ever used for the mixtures of air, was of considerable use for the same purpose) i began to entertain some doubt of the efficacy of fixed air in this case. in some cases also the mixture of fixed air had by no means so much effect on the putrid air as, from the generality of my observations, i should have expected. i was always aware, indeed, that it might be said, that, the residuum of fixed air not being very noxious, such an addition must contribute to mend the putrid air; but, in order to obviate this objection, i once mixed the residuum of as much fixed air as i had found, by a variety of trials, to be sufficient to restore a given quantity of putrid air, with an equal quantity of that air, without making any sensible melioration of it. upon the whole, i am inclined to think that this process could hardly have succeeded so well as it did with me, and in so great a number of trials, unless fixed air have some tendency to correct air tainted with respiration or putrefaction; and it is perfectly agreeable to the analogy of dr. macbride's discoveries, and may naturally be expected from them, that it should have such an effect. by a mixture of fixed air i have made wholesome the residuum of air generated by putrefaction only, from mice plunged in water. this, one would imagine, _à priori_, to be the most noxious of all kinds of air. for if common air only tainted with putrefaction be so deadly, much more might one expect that air to be so, which was generated from putrefaction only; but it seems to be nothing more than common air (or at least that kind of fixed air which is not absorbed by water) tainted with putrefaction, and therefore requires no other process to sweeten it. in this case, however, we seem to have an instance of the generation of genuine common air, though mixed with something that is foreign to it. perhaps the residuum of fixed air may be another instance of the same nature, and also the residuum of inflammable air, and of nitrous air, especially nitrous air loaded with phlogiston, after long agitation in water. fixed air is equally diffused through the whole mass of any quantity of putrid air with which it is mixed: for dividing the mixture into two equal parts, they were reduced in the same proportion by passing through water. but this is also the case with some of the kinds of air which will not incorporate, as inflammable air, and air in which brimstone has burned. if fixed air tend to correct air which has been injured by animal respiration or putrefaction, _lime kilns_, which discharge great quantities of fixed air, may be wholesome in the neighbourhood of populous cities, the atmosphere of which must abound with putrid effluvia. i should think also that physicians might avail themselves of the application of fixed air in many putrid disorders, especially as it may be so easily administered by way of _clyster_, where it would often find its way to much of the putrid matter. nothing is to be apprehended from the distention of the bowels by this kind of air, since it is so readily absorbed by any fluid or moist substance. since fixed air is not noxious _per se_, but, like fire, only in excess, i do not think it at all hazardous to attempt to _breathe_ it. it is however easily conveyed into the _stomach_, in natural or artificial pyrmont water, in briskly-fermenting liquors, or a vegetable diet. it is even possible, that a considerable quantity of fixed air might be imbibed by the absorbing vessels of the skin, if the whole body, except the head, should be suspended over a vessel of strongly-fermenting liquor; and in some putrid disorders this treatment might be very salutary. if the body was exposed quite naked, there would be very little danger from the cold in this situation, and the air having freer access to the skin might produce a greater effect. being no physician, i run no risk by throwing out these random, and perhaps whimsical proposals.[ ] having communicated my observations on fixed air, and especially my scheme of applying it by way of _clyster_ in putrid disorders, to mr. hey, an ingenious surgeon in leeds a case presently occurred, in which he had an opportunity of giving it a trial; and mentioning it to dr. hird and dr. crowther, two physicians who attended the patient, they approved the scheme, and it was put in execution; both by applying the fixed air by way of clyster, and at the same time making the patient drink plentifully of liquors strongly impregnated with it. the event was such, that i requested mr. hey to draw up a particular account of the case, describing the whole of the treatment, that the public might be satisfied that this new application of fixed air is perfectly safe, and also, have an opportunity of judging how far it had the effect which i expected from it; and as the application is new, and not unpromising, i shall subjoin his letter to me on the subject, by way of _appendix_ to these papers. when i began my inquires into the properties of different kinds of air, i engaged my friend dr. percival to attend to the _medicinal uses_ of them, being sensible that his knowledge of philosophy as well as of medicine would give him a singular advantage for this purpose. the result of his observations i shall also insert in the appendix. footnotes: [ ] some time after these papers were first printed, i was pleased to find the same proposal in _dr. alexander's experimental essays_. section v. _of air in which a mixture of brimstone and filings of iron has stood._ reading in dr. hales's account of his experiments, that there was a great diminution of the quantity of air in which _a mixture of powdered brimstone and filings of iron, made into a paste with water_, had stood, i repeated the experiment, and found the diminution greater than i had expected. this diminution of air is made as effectually, and as expeditiously, in quicksilver as in water; and it may be measured with the greatest accuracy, because there is neither any previous expansion or increase of the quantity of air, and because it is some time before this process begins to have any sensible effect. this diminution of air is various; but i have generally found it to be between one fifth and one fourth of the whole. air thus diminished is not heavier, but rather lighter than common air; and though lime-water does not become turbid when it is exposed to this air, it is probably owing to the formation of a selenitic salt, as was the case with the simple burning of brimstone above-mentioned. that something proceeding from the brimstone strongly affects the water which is confined in the same place with this mixture, is manifest from the very strong smell that it has of the volatile spirit of vitriol. i conclude that the diminution of air by this, process is of the same kind with the diminution of it in the other cases, because when this mixture is put into air which has been previously diminished, either by the burning of candles, by respiration, or putrefaction, though it never fails to diminish it something more, it is, however, no farther than this process alone would have done it. if a fresh mixture be introduced into a quantity of air which had been reduced by a former mixture, it has little or no farther effect. i once observed, that when a mixture of this kind was taken out of a quantity of air in which a candle had before burned out, and in which it had stood for several days, it was quite cold and black, as it always becomes in a confined place; but it presently grew very hot, smoaked copously, and smelled very offensively; and when it was cold, it was brown, like the rust of iron. i once put a mixture of this kind to a quantity of inflammable air, made from iron, by which means it was diminished / or / in its bulk; but, as far as i could judge, it was still as inflammable as ever. another quantity of inflammable air was also reduced in the same proportion, by a mouse putrefying in it; but its inflammability was not seemingly lessened. air diminished by this mixture of iron filings and brimstone, is exceedingly noxious to animals, and i have not perceived that it grows any better by keeping in water. the smell of it is very pungent and offensive. the quantity of this mixture which i made use of in the preceding experiments, was from two to four ounce measures; but i did not perceive, but that the diminution of the quantity of air (which was generally about twenty ounce measures) was as great with the smallest, as with the largest quantity. how small a quantity is necessary to diminish a given quantity of air to a _maximum_, i have made no experiments to ascertain. as soon as this mixture of iron filings with, brimstone and water, begins to ferment, it also turns black, and begins to swell, and it continues to do so, till it occupies twice as much space as it did at first. the force with which it expands is great; but how great it is i have not endeavoured to determine. when this mixture is immersed in water, it generates no air, though it becomes black, and swells. section vi. _of nitrous air._ ever since i first read dr. hales's most excellent _statical essays_, i was particularly struck with that experiment of his, of which an account is given, vol. i, p. . and vol. ii, p. . in which common air, and air generated from the walton pyrites, by spirit of nitre, made a turbid red mixture, and in which part of the common air was absorbed; but i never expected to have the satisfaction of seeing this remarkable appearance, supposing it to be peculiar to that particular mineral. happening to mention this subject to the hon. mr. cavendish, when i was in london, in the spring of the year , he said that he did not imagine but that other kinds of pyrites, or the metals might answer as well, and that probably the red appearance of the mixture depended upon the spirit of nitre only. this encouraged me to attend to the subject; and having no pyrites, i began with the solution of the different metals in spirit of nitre, and catching the air which was generated in the solution, i presently found what i wanted, and a good deal more. beginning with the solution of brass, on the th of june , i first found this remarkable species of air, only one effect of which, was casually observed by dr. hales; and he gave so little attention to it, and it has been so much unnoticed since his time, that, as far as i know, no name has been given to it. i therefore found myself, contrary to my first resolution, under an absolute necessity of giving a name to this kind of air myself. when i first began to speak and write of it to my friends, i happened to distinguish it by the name of _nitrous air_, because i had procured it by means of spirit of nitre only; and though i cannot say that i altogether like the term, neither myself nor any of my friends, to whom i have applied for the purpose, have been able to hit upon a better; so that i am obliged, after all, to content myself with it. i have found that this kind of air is readily procured from iron, copper, brass, tin, silver, quicksilver, bismuth, and nickel, by the nitrous acid only, and from gold and the regulus of antimony by _aqua regia_. the circumstances attending the solution of each of these metals are various, but hardly worth mentioning, in treating of the properties of the _air_ which they yield; which, from what metal soever it is extracted, has, as far as i have been able to observe, the very same properties. one of the most conspicuous properties of this kind of air is the great diminution of any quantity of common air with which it is mixed, attended with a turbid red, or deep orange colour, and a considerable heat. the _smell_ of it, also, is very strong, and remarkable, but very much resembling that of smoking spirit of nitre. the diminution of a mixture of this and common air is not an equal diminution of both the kinds, which is all that dr. hales could observe, but of about one fifth of the common air, and as much of the nitrous air as is necessary to produce that effect; which, as i have found by many trials, is about one half as much as the original quantity of common air. for if one measure of nitrous air be put to two measures of common air, in a few minutes (by which time the effervescence will be over, and the mixture will have recovered its transparency) there will want about one ninth of the original two measures; and if both the kinds of air be very pure, the diminution will still go on slowly, till in a day or two, the whole will be reduced to one fifth less than the original quantity of common air. this farther diminution, by long standing, i had not observed at the time of the first publication of these papers. i hardly know any experiment that is more adapted to amaze and surprize than this is, which exhibits a quantity of air, which, as it were, devours a quantity of another kind of air half as large as itself, and yet is so far from gaining any addition to its bulk, that it is considerably diminished by it. if, after this full saturation of common air with nitrous air, more nitrous air be put to it, it makes an addition equal to its own bulk, without producing the least redness, or any other visible effect. if the smallest quantity of common air be put to any larger quantity of nitrous air, though the two together will not occupy so much space as they did separately, yet the quantity will still be larger than that of the nitrous air only. one ounce measure of common air being put to near twenty ounce measures of nitrous air, made an addition to it of about half an ounce measure. this being a much greater proportion than the diminution of common air, in the former experiment, proves that part of the diminution in the former case is in the nitrous air. besides, it will presently appear, that nitrous air is subject to a most remarkable diminution; and as common air, in a variety of other cases, suffers a diminution from one fifth to one fourth, i conclude, that in this case also it does not exceed that proportion, and therefore that the remainder of the diminution respects the nitrous air. in order to judge whether the _water_ contributed to the diminution of this mixture of nitrous and common air, i made the whole process several times in quicksilver, using one third of nitrous, and two thirds of common air, as before. in this case the redness continued a very long time, and the diminution was not so great as when the mixtures had been made in water, there remaining one seventh more than the original quantity of common air. this mixture stood all night upon the quicksilver; and the next morning i observed that it was no farther diminished upon the admission of water to it, nor by pouring it several times through the water, and letting it stand in water two days. another mixture, which had stood about six hours on the quicksilver, was diminished a little more upon the admission of water, but was never less than the original quantity of common air. in another case however, in which the mixture had stood but a very short time in quicksilver, the farther diminution, which took place upon the admission of water, was much more considerable; so that the diminution, upon the whole, was very nearly as great as if the process had been intirely in water. it is evident from these experiments, that the diminution is in part owing to the absorption by the water; but that when the mixture is kept a long time, in a situation in which there is no water to absorb any part of it, it acquires a constitution, by which it is afterwards incapable of being absorbed by water, or rather, there is an addition to the quantity of air by nitrous air produced by the solution of the quicksilver. it will be seen, in the second part of this work, that, in the decomposition of nitrous air by its mixture with common air, there is nothing at hand when the process is made in quicksilver, with which the acid that entered into its composition can readily unite. in order to determine whether the fixed part of common air was deposited in the diminution of it by nitrous air, i inclosed a vessel full of lime-water in the jar in which the process was made, but it occasioned no precipitation of the lime; and when the vessel was taken out, after it had been in that situation a whole day, the lime was easily precipitated by breathing into it as usual. but though the precipitation of the lime was not sensible in this method of making the experiment, it is sufficiently so when the whole process is made in lime-water, as will be seen in the second part of this work; so that we have here another evidence of the deposition of fixed air from common air. i have made no alteration, however, in the preceding paragraph, because it may not be unuseful, as a caution to future experimenters. it is exceedingly remarkable that this effervescence and diminution, occasioned by the mixture of nitrous air, is peculiar to common air, or _air fit for respiration_; and, as far as i can judge, from a great number of observations, is at least very nearly, if not exactly, in proportion to its fitness for this purpose; so that by this means the goodness of air may be distinguished much more accurately than it can be done by putting mice, or any other animals, to breathe in it. this was a most agreeable discovery to me, as i hope it may be an useful one to the public; especially as, from this time, i had no occasion for so large a stock of mice as i had been used to keep for the purpose of these experiments, using them only in those which required to be very decisive; and in these cases i have seldom failed to know beforehand in what manner they would be affected. it is also remarkable that, on whatever account air is unfit for respiration, this same test is equally applicable. thus there is not the least effervescence between nitrous and fixed air, or inflammable air, or any species of diminished air. also the degree of diminution being from nothing at all to more than one third of the whole of any quantity of air, we are, by this means, in possession of a prodigiously large _scale_, by which we may distinguish very small degrees of difference in the goodness of air. i have not attended much to this circumstance, having used this test chiefly for greater differences; but, if i did not deceive myself, i have perceived a real difference in the air of my study, after a few persons have been with me in it, and the air on the outside of the house. also a phial of air having been sent me, from the neighbourhood of york, it appeared not to be so good as the air near leeds; that is, it was not diminished so much by an equal mixture of nitrous air, every other circumstance being as nearly the same as i could contrive. it may perhaps be possible, but i have not yet attempted it, to distinguish some of the different winds, or the air of different times of the year, &c. &c. by this test. by means of this test i was able to determine what i was before in doubt about, viz. the _kind_ as well as the _degree_ of injury done to air by candles burning in it. i could not tell with certainty, by means of mice, whether it was at all injured with respect to respiration; and yet if nitrous air may be depended upon for furnishing an accurate test, it must be rather more than one third worse than common air, and have been diminished by the same general cause of the other diminutions of air. for when, after many trials, i put one measure of thoroughly putrid and highly noxious air, into the same vessel with two measures of good wholesome air, and into another vessel an equal quantity, viz. three measures of air in which a candle had burned out; and then put equal quantities of nitrous air to each of them, the latter was diminished rather more than the former. it agrees with this observation, that _burned air_ is farther diminished both by putrefaction, and a mixture of iron filings and brimstone; and i therefore take it for granted by every other cause of the diminution of air. it is probable, therefore, that burned air is air so far loaded with phlogiston, as to be able to extinguish a candle, which it may do long before it is fully saturated. inflammable air with a mixture of nitrous air burns with a green flame. this makes a very pleasing experiment when it is properly conducted. as, for some time, i chiefly made use of _copper_ for the generation of nitrous air, i first ascribed this circumstance to that property of this metal, by which it burns with a green flame; but i was presently satisfied that it must arise from the spirit of nitre, for the effect is the very same from which ever of the metals the nitrous air is extracted, all of which i tried for this purpose, even silver and gold. a mixture of oil of vitriol and spirit of nitre in equal proportions dissolved iron, and the produce was nitrous air; but a less degree of spirit of nitre in the mixture produced air that was inflammable, and which burned with a green flame. it also tinged common air a little red, and diminished it, though not much. the diminution of common air by a mixture of nitrous air, is not so extraordinary as the diminution which nitrous air itself is subject to from a mixture of iron filings and brimstone, made into a paste with water. this mixture, as i have already observed, diminishes common air between one fifth and one fourth, but has no such effect upon any kind of air that has been diminished, and rendered noxious by any other process; but when it is put to a quantity of nitrous air, it diminishes it so much, that no more than one fourth of the original quantity will be left. the effect of this process is generally perceived in five or six hours, about which time the visible effervesence of the mixture begins; and in a very short time it advances so rapidly, that in about an hour almost the whole effect will have taken place. if it be suffered to stand a day or two longer, the air will still be diminished farther, but only a very little farther, in proportion to the first diminution. the glass jar, in which the air and this mixture have been confined, has generally been so much heated in this process, that i have not been able to touch it. nitrous air thus diminished has not so strong a smell as nitrous air itself, but smells just like common air in which the same mixture has stood; and it is not capable of being diminished any farther, by a fresh mixture of iron and brimstone. common air saturated with nitrous air is also no farther diminished by this mixture of iron filings and brimstone, though the mixture ferments with great heat, and swells very much in it. plants die very soon, both in nitrous air, and also in common air saturated with nitrous air, but especially in the former. neither nitrous air, nor common air saturated with nitrous air, differ in specific gravity from common air. at least, the difference is so small, that i could not be sure there was any; sometimes about three pints of it seeming to be about half a grain heavier, and at other times as much lighter than common air. having, among other kinds of air, exposed a quantity of nitrous air to water out of which the air had been well boiled, in the experiment to which i have more than once referred (as having been the occasion of several new and important observations) i found that / of the whole was absorbed. perceiving, to my great surprize, that so very great a proportion of this kind of air was miscible with water, i immediately began to agitate a considerable quantity of it, in a jar standing in a trough of the same kind of water; and, with about four times as much agitation as fixed air requires, it was so far absorbed by the water, that only about one fifth remained. this remainder extinguished flame, and was noxious to animals. afterwards i diminished a pretty large quantity of nitrous air to one eighth of its original bulk, and the remainder still retained much of its peculiar smell, and diminished common air a little. a mouse also died in it, but not so suddenly as it would have done in pure nitrous air. in this operation the peculiar smell of nitrous air is very manifest, the water being first impregnated with the air, and then transmitting it to the common atmosphere. this experiment gave me the hint of impregnating water with nitrous air, in the manner in which i had before done it with fixed air; and i presently found that distilled water would imbibe about one tenth of its bulk of this kind of air, and that it acquired a remarkably acid and astringent taste from it. the smell of water thus impregnated is at first peculiarly pungent. i did not chuse to swallow any of it, though, for any thing that i know, it may be perfectly innocent, and perhaps, in some cases, salutary. this kind of air is retained very obstinately by water. in an exhausted receiver a quantity of water thus saturated emitted a whitish fume, such as sometimes issues from bubbles of this air when it is first generated, and also some air-bubbles; but though it was suffered to stand a long time in this situation, it still retained its peculiar taste; but when it had stood all night pretty near the fire, the water was become quite vapid, and had deposited a filmy kind of matter, of which i had often collected a considerable quantity from the trough in which jars containing this air had stood. this i suppose to be a precipitate of the metal, by the solution of which the nitrous air was generated. i have not given so much attention to it as to know, with certainty, in what circumstances this _deposit_ is made, any more than i do the matter deposited from inflammable air above-mentioned; for i cannot get it, at least in any considerable quantity, when i please; whereas i have often found abundance of it, when i did not expect it at all. the nitrous air with which i made the first impregnation of water was extracted from copper; but when i made the impregnation with air from quicksilver, the water had the very same taste, though the matter deposited from it seemed to be of a different kind; for it was whitish, whereas the other had a yellowish tinge. except the first quantity of this impregnated water, i could never deprive any more that i made of its peculiar taste. i have even let some of it stand more than a week, in phials with their mouths open, and sometimes very near the fire, without producing any alteration in it[ ]. whether any of the spirit of nitre contained in the nitrous air be mixed with the water in this operation, i have not yet endeavoured to determine. this, however, may probably be the case, as the spirit of nitre is, in a considerable degree, volatile[ ]. it will perhaps be thought, that the most _useful_, if not the most remarkable, of all the properties of this extraordinary kind of air, is its power of preserving animal substances from putrefaction, and of restoring those that are already putrid, which it possesses in a far greater degree than fixed air. my first observation of this was altogether casual. having found nitrous air to suffer so great a diminution as i have already mentioned by a mixture of iron filings and brimstone, i was willing to try whether it would be equally diminished by other causes of the diminution of common air, especially by putrefaction; and for this purpose i put a dead mouse into a quantity of it, and placed it near the fire, where the tendency to putrefaction was very great. in this case there was a considerable diminution, viz. from - / to - / ; but not so great as i had expected, the antiseptic power of the nitrous air having checked the tendency to putrefaction; for when, after a week, i took the mouse out, i perceived, to my very great surprize, that it had no offensive smell. upon this i took two other mice, one of them just killed, and the other soft and putrid, and put them both into the same jar of nitrous air, standing in the usual temperature of the weather, in the months of july and august of ; and after twenty-five days, having observed that there was little or no change in the quantity of the air, i took the mice out; and, examining them, found them both perfectly sweet, even when cut through in several places. that which had been put into the air when just dead was quite firm; and the flesh of the other, which had been putrid and soft, was still soft, but perfectly sweet. in order to compare the antiseptic power of this kind of air with that of fixed air, i examined a mouse which i had inclosed in a phial full of fixed air, as pure as i could make it, and which i had corked very close; but upon opening this phial in water about a month after, i perceived that a large quantity of putrid effluvium had been generated; for it rushed with violence out of the phial; and the smell that came from it, the moment the cork was taken out, was insufferably offensive. indeed dr. macbride says, that he could only restore very thin pieces of putrid flesh by means of fixed air. perhaps the antiseptic power of these kinds of air may be in proportion to their acidity. if a little pains were taken with this subject, this remarkable antiseptic power of nitrous air might possibly be applied to various uses, perhaps to the preservation of the more delicate birds, fishes, fruits, &c. mixing it in different proportions with common or fixed air. of this property of nitrous air anatomists may perhaps avail themselves, as animal substances may by this means be preserved in their natural soft state; but how long it will answer for this purpose, experience only can shew. i calcined lead and tin in the manner hereafter described in a quantity of nitrous air, but with very little sensible effect; which rather surprized me; as, from the result of the experiment with the iron filings and brimstone, i had expected a very great diminution of the nitrous air by this process; the mixture of iron filings and brimstone, and the calcination of metals, having the same effect upon common air, both of them diminishing it in nearly the same proportion. but though i made the metals _fume_ copiously in nitrous air, there might be no real _calcination_, the phlogiston not being separated, and the proper calcination prevented by there being no _fixed_ _air_, which is necessary to the formation of the calx, to unite with it. nitrous air is procured from all the proper metals by spirit of nitre, except lead, and from all the semi-metals that i have tried, except zinc. for this purpose i have used bismuth and nickel, with spirit of nitre only, and regulus of antimony and platina, with _aqua regia_. i got little or no air from lead by spirit of nitre, and have not yet made any experiments to ascertain the nature of this solution. with zinc i have taken a little pains. four penny-weights and seventeen grains of zinc dissolved in spirit of nitre, to which as much water was added, yielded about twelve ounce measures of air, which had, in some degree, the properties of nitrous air, making a slight effervescence with common air, and diminishing it about as much as nitrous air, which had been itself diminished one half by washing in water. the smell of them both was also the same; so that i concluded it to be the same thing, that part of the nitrous air, which is imbibed by water, being retained in this solution. in order to discover whether this was the case, i made the solution boil in a sand-heat. some air came from it in this state, which seemed to be the same thing, with nitrous air diminished about one sixth, or one eighth, by washing in water. when the fluid part was evaporated, there remained a brown fixed substance, which was observed by mr. hellot, who describes it, ac. par. , m. p. . a part of this i threw into a small red-hot crucible; and covering it immediately with a receiver, standing in water, i observed that very dense red fumes rose from it, and filled the receiver. this redness continued about as long as that which is occasioned by a mixture of nitrous and common air; the air was also considerably diminished within the receiver. this substance, therefore, must certainly have contained within it the very same thing, or principle, on which the peculiar properties of nitrous air depend. it is remarkable, however, that though the air within the receiver was diminished about one fifth by this process, it was itself as much affected with a mixture of nitrous air, as common air is, and a candle burned in it very well. this may perhaps be attributed to some effect of the spirit of nitre, in the composition of that brown substance. nitrous air, i find, will be considerably diminished in its bulk by standing a long time in water, about as much as inflammable air is diminished in the same circumstances. for this purpose i kept for some months a quart-bottle full of each of these kinds of air; but as different quantities of inflammable air vary very much in this respect, it is not improbable but that nitrous air may vary also. from one trial that i made, i conclude that nitrous air may be kept in a bladder much better than most other kinds of air. the air to which i refer was kept about a fortnight in a bladder, through which the peculiar smell of the nitrous air was very sensible for several days. in a day or two the bladder became red, and was much contracted in its dimensions. the air within it had lost very little of its peculiar property of diminishing common air. i did not endeavour to ascertain the exact quantity of nitrous air produced from given quantities, of all the metals which yield it; but the few observations which i did make for this purpose i shall recite in this place: dwt. gr. of silver yielded - / ounce measures. of quicksilver - / - / of copper - / of brass of iron of bismuth of nickel footnotes: [ ] i have since found, that nitrous air has never failed to escape from the water, which has been impregnated with it, by long exposure to the open air. [ ] this suspicion has been confirmed by the ingenious mr. bewley, of great massingham in norfolk, who has discovered that the acid taste of this water is not the necessary consequence of its impregnation with nitrous air, but is the effect of the _acid vapour_, into which part of this air is resolved, when it is decomposed by a mixture with common air. this, it will be seen, exactly agrees with my own observation on the constitution of nitrous air, in the second part of this work. a more particular account of mr. bewley's observation will be given in the _appendix_. section vii. _of air infected with the fumes of burning charcoal._ air infected with the fumes of burning charcoal is well known to be noxious; and the honourable mr. cavendish favoured me with an account of some experiments of his, in which a quantity of common air was reduced from to ounce measures, by passing through a red-hot iron tube filled with the dust of charcoal. this diminution he ascribed to such a _destruction_ of common air as dr. hales imagined to be the consequence of burning. mr. cavendish also observed, that there had been a generation of fixed air in this process, but that it was absorbed by sope leys. this experiment i also repeated, with a small variation of circumstances, and with nearly the same result. afterwards, i endeavoured to ascertain, by what appears to me to be an easier and more certain method, in what manner air is affected with the fumes of charcoal, viz. by suspending bits of charcoal within glass vessels, filled to a certain height with water, and standing inverted in another vessel of water, while i threw the focus of a burning mirror, or lens, upon them. in this manner i diminished a given quantity of air one fifth, which is nearly in the same proportion with other diminutions of air. if, instead of pure water, i used _lime-water_ in this process, it never failed to become turbid by the precipitation of the lime, which could only be occasioned by fixed air, either discharged from the charcoal, or deposited by the common air. at first i concluded that it came from the charcoal; but considering that it is not probable that fixed air, confined in any substance, can bear so great a degree of heat as is necessary to make charcoal, without being wholly expelled; and that in other diminutions of common air, by phlogiston only, there appears to be a deposition of fixed air, i have now no doubt but that, in this case also, it is supplied from the same source. this opinion is the more probable, from there being the same precipitation of lime, in this process, with whatever degree of heat the charcoal had been made. if, however, the charcoal had not been made with a very considerable degree of heat, there never failed to be a permanent addition of inflammable air produced; which agrees with what i observed before, that, in converting dry wood into charcoal, the greatest part is changed into inflammable air. i have sometimes found, that charcoal which was made with the most intense heat of a smith's fire, which vitrified part of a common crucible in which the charcoal was confined, and which had been continued above half an hour, did not diminish the air in which the focus of a burning mirror was thrown upon it; a quantity of inflammable air equal to the diminution of the common air being generated in the process: whereas, at other times, i have not perceived that there was any generation of inflammable air, but a simple diminution of common air, when the charcoal had been made with a much less degree of heat. this subject deserves to be farther investigated. to make the preceding experiment with still more accuracy, i repeated it in quicksilver; when i perceived that there was a small increase of the quantity of air, probably from a generation of inflammable air. thus it stood without any alteration a whole night, and part of the following day; when lime-water, being admitted to it, it presently became turbid, and, after some time, the whole quantity of air, which was about four ounce measures, was diminished one fifth, as before. in this case, i carefully weighed the piece of charcoal, which was exactly two grains, and could not find that it was sensibly diminished in weight by the operation. air thus diminished by the fumes of burning charcoal not only extinguishes flame, but is in the highest degree noxious to animals; it makes no effervescence with nitrous air, and is incapable of being diminished any farther by the fumes of more charcoal, by a mixture of iron filings and brimstone, or by any other cause of the diminution of air that i am acquainted with. this observation, which respects all other kinds of diminished air, proves that dr. hales was mistaken in his notion of the _absorption_ of air in those circumstances in which he observed it. for he supposed that the remainder was, in all cases, of the same nature with that which had been absorbed, and that the operation of the same cause would not have failed to produce a farther diminution; whereas all my observations shew that air, which has once been fully diminished by any cause whatever, is not only incapable of any farther diminution, either from the same or from any other cause, but that it has likewise acquired _new properties_, most remarkably different from those which it had before, and that they are, in a great measure, the same in all the cases. these circumstances give reason to suspect, that the cause of diminution is, in reality, the same in all the cases. what this cause is, may, perhaps, appear in the next course of observations. section viii. _of the effect of the calcination of metals, and of the effluvia of paint made with white-lead and oil, on air._ having been led to suspect, from the experiments which i had made with charcoal, that the diminution of air in that case, and perhaps in other cases also, was, in some way or other the consequence of its having more than its usual quantity of phlogiston, it occurred to me, that the calcination of metals, which are generally supposed to consist of nothing but a metallic earth united to phlogiston, would tend to ascertain the fact, and be a kind of _experimentum crucis_ in the case. accordingly, i suspended pieces of lead and tin in given quantities of air, in the same manner as i had before treated the charcoal; and throwing the focus of a burning mirror or lens upon them, so as to make them fume copiously. i presently perceived a diminution of the air. in the first trial that i made, i reduced four ounce measures of air to three, which is the greatest diminution of common air that i had ever observed before, and which i account for, by supposing that, in other cases, there was not only a cause of diminution, but causes of addition also, either of fixed or inflammable air, or some other permanently elastic matter, but that the effect of the calcination of metals being simply the escape of phlogiston, the cause of diminution was alone and uncontrouled. the air, which i had thus diminished by calcination of lead, i transferred into another clean phial, but found that the calcination of more lead in it (or at least the attempt to make a farther calcination) had no farther effect upon it. this air also, like that which had been infected with the fumes of charcoal, was in the highest degree noxious, made no effervescence with nitrous air, was no farther diminished by the mixture of iron filings and brimstone, and was not only rendered innoxious, but also recovered, in a great measure, the other properties of common air, by washing in water. it might be suspected that the noxious quality of air in which _lead_ was calcined, might be owing to some fumes peculiar to that metal; but i found no sensible difference between the properties of this air, and that in which _tin_ was calcined. the _water_ over which metals are calcined acquires a yellowish tinge, and an exceedingly pungent smell and taste, pretty much (as near as i can recollect, for i did not compare them together) like that over which brimstone has been frequently burned. also a thin and whitish pellicle covered both the surface of the water, and likewise the sides of the phial in which the calcination was made; insomuch that, without frequently agitating the water, it grew so opaque by this constantly accumulating incrustation, that the sun-beams could not be transmitted through it in a quantity sufficient to produce the calcination. i imagined, however, that, even when this air was transferred into a clean phial, the metals were not so easily melted or calcined as they were in fresh air; for the air being once fully saturated with phlogiston, may not so readily admit any more, though it be only to transmit it to the water. i also suspected that metals were not easily melted or calcined in inflammable, fixed, or nitrous air, or any kind of diminished air.[ ] none of these kinds of air suffered any change by this operation; nor was there any precipitation of lime, when charcoal was heated in any of these kinds of air standing in lime-water. this furnishes another, and i think a pretty decisive proof, that, in the precipitation of lime by charcoal, the fixed air does not come from the charcoal, but from the common air. otherwise it is hard to assign a reason, why the same degree of heat (or at least a much greater) should not expel the fixed air from this substance, though surrounded by these different kinds of air, and why the fixed air might not be transmitted through them to the lime-water. query. may not water impregnated with phlogiston from calcined metals, or by any other method, be of some use in medicine? the effect of this impregnation is exceedingly remarkable; but the principle with which it is impregnated is volatile, and intirely escapes in a day or two, if the surface of the water be exposed to the common atmosphere. it should seem that phlogiston is retained more obstinately by charcoal than it is by lead or tin; for when any given quantity of air is fully saturated with phlogiston from charcoal, no heat that i have yet applied has been able to produce any more effect upon it; whereas, in the same circumstances, lead and tin may still be calcined, at least be made to emit a copious fume, in which some part of the phlogiston may be set loose. the air indeed, can take no more; but the water receives it, and the sides of the phial also receive an addition of incrustation. this is a white powdery substance, and well deserves to be examined. i shall endeavour to do it at my leisure. lime-water never became turbid by the calcination of metals over it, the calx immediately seizing the precipitated fixed air, in preference to the lime in the water; but the colour, smell, and taste of the water was always changed and the surface of it became covered with a yellow pellicle, as before. when this process was made in quicksilver, the air was diminished only one fifth; and upon water being admitted to it, no more was absorbed; which is an effect similar to that of a mixture of nitrous and common air, which was mentioned before. the preceding experiments on the calcination of metals suggested to me a method of explaining the cause of the mischief which is known to arise from fresh _paint_, made with white-lead (which i suppose is an imperfect calx of lead) and oil. to verify my hypothesis, i first put a small pot full of this kind of paint, and afterwards (which answered much better, by exposing a greater surface of the paint) i daubed several pieces of paper with it, and put them under a receiver, and observed, that in about twenty-four hours, the air was diminished between one fifth and one fourth, for i did not measure it very exactly. this air also was, as i expected to find, in the highest degree noxious; it did not effervesce with nitrous air, it was no farther diminished by a mixture of iron filings and brimstone, and was made wholesome by agitation in water deprived of all air. i think it appears pretty evident, from the preceding experiments on the calcination of metals that air is, some way or other, diminished in consequence of being highly charged with phlogiston; and that agitation in water restores it, by imbibing a great part of the phlogistic matter. that water has a considerable affinity with phlogiston, is evident from the strong impregnation which it receives from it. may not plants also restore air diminished by putrefaction by absorbing part of the phlogiston with which it is loaded? the greater part of a dry plant, as well as of a dry animal substance, consists of inflammable air, or something that is capable of being converted into inflammable air; and it seems to be as probable that this phlogistic matter may have been imbibed by the roots and leaves of plants, and afterwards incorporated into their substance, as that it is altogether produced by the power of vegetation. may not this phlogistic matter be even the most essential part of the food and support of both vegetable and animal bodies? in the experiments with metals, the diminution of air seems to be the consequence of nothing but a saturation with phlogiston; and in all the other cases of the diminution of air, i do not see but that it may be effected by the same means. when a vegetable or animal substance is dissolved by putrefaction, the escape of the phlogistic matter (which, together with all its other constituent parts, is then let loose from it) may be the circumstance that produces the diminution of the air in which it putrefies. it is highly improbable that what remains after an animal body has been thoroughly dissolved by putrefaction, should yield so great a quantity of inflammable air, as the dried animal substance would have done. of this i have not made an actual trial, though i have often thought of doing it, and still intend to do it; but i think there can be no doubt of the result. again, iron, by its fermentation with brimstone and water, is evidently reduced to a calx, so that phlogiston must have escaped from it. phlogiston also must evidently be set loose by the ignition of charcoal, and is not improbably the matter which flies off from paint, composed of white-lead and oil. lastly, since spirit of nitre is known to have a very remarkable affinity with phlogiston, it is far from being improbable that nitrous air may also produce the same effect by the same means. to this hypothesis it may be objected, that, if diminished air be air saturated with phlogiston, it ought to be inflammable. but this by no means follows; since its inflammability may depend upon some particular _mode of combination_, or degree of affinity, with which we are not acquainted. besides, inflammable air seems to consist of some other principle, or to have some other constituent part, besides phlogiston and common air, as is probable from that remarkable deposit, which, as i have observed, is made by inflammable air, both from iron and zinc. it is not improbable, however, but that a greater degree of heat may inflame that air which extinguishes a common candle, if it could be conveniently applied. air that is inflammable, i observe, extinguishes red-hot wood; and indeed inflammable substances can only be those which, in a certain degree of heat, have a less affinity with the phlogiston they contain, than the air, or some other contiguous substance, has with it; so that the phlogiston only quits one substance, with which it was before combined, and enters another, with which it may be combined in a very different manner. this substance, however, whether it be air or any thing else, being now fully saturated with phlogiston, and not being able to take any more, in the same circumstances, must necessarily extinguish fire, and put a stop to the ignition of all other bodies, that is, to the farther escape of phlogiston from them. that plants restore noxious air, by imbibing the phlogiston with which it is loaded, is very agreeable to the conjectures of dr. franklin, made many years ago, and expressed in the following extract from the last edition of his letters, p. . "i have been inclined to think that the fluid _fire_, as well as the fluid _air_, is attracted by plants in their growth, and becomes consolidated with the other materials of which they are formed, and makes a great part of their substance; that, when they come to be digested, and to suffer in the vessels a kind of fermentation, part of the fire, as well as part of the air, recovers its fluid active state again, and diffuses itself in the body, digesting and separating it; that the fire so re-produced, by digestion and separation, continually leaving the body, its place is supplied by fresh quantities, arising from the continual separation; that whatever quickens the motion of the fluids in an animal, quickens the separation, and re-produces more of the fire, as exercise; that all the fire emitted by wood, and other combustibles, when burning, existed in them before in a solid state, being only discovered when separating; that some fossils, as sulphur, sea-coal, &c. contain a great deal of solid fire; and that, in short, what escapes and is dissipated in the burning of bodies, besides water and earth, is generally the air and fire, that before made parts of the solid." footnotes: [ ] i conclude from the experiments of m. lavoisier, which were made with a much better burning lens than i had an opportunity of making use of, that there was no _real calcination_ of the metals, though they were made to _fume_ in inflammable or nitrous air; because he was not able to produce more than a slight degree of calcination in any given quantity of common air. section ix. _of marine acid air._ being very much struck with the result of an experiment of the hon. mr. cavendish, related phil. trans. vol. lvi. p. , by which, though, he says, he was not able to get any inflammable air from copper, by means of spirit of salt, he got a much more remarkable kind of air, viz. one that lost its elasticity by coming into contact with water, i was exceedingly desirous of making myself acquainted with it. on this account, i began with making the experiment in quicksilver, which i never failed to do in any case in which i suspected that air might either be absorbed by water, or be in any other manner affected by it; and by this means i presently got a much more distinct idea of the nature and effects of this curious solution. having put some copper filings into a small phial, with a quantity of spirit of salt; and making the air (which was generated in great plenty, on the application of heat) ascend into a tall glass vessel full of quicksilver, and standing in quicksilver, the whole produce continued a considerable time without any change of dimensions. i then introduced a small quantity of water to it; when about three fourths of it (the whole being about four ounce measures) presently, but gradually, disappeared, the quicksilver rising in the vessel. i then introduced a considerable quantity of water; but there was no farther diminution of the air, and the remainder i found to be inflammable. having frequently continued this process a long time after the admission of the water, i was much amused with observing the large bubbles of the newly generated air, which came through the quicksilver, the sudden diminution of them when they came to the water, and the very small bubbles which went through the water. they made, however, a continual, though slow, increase of inflammable air. fixed air, being admitted to the whole produce of this air from copper, had no sensible effect upon it. upon the admission of water, a great part of the mixture presently disappeared; another part, which i suppose to have been the fixed air, was absorbed slowly; and in this particular case the very small permanent residuum did not take fire; but it is very possible that it might have done so, if the quantity had been greater. the solution of _lead_ in the marine acid is attended with the very same phænomena as the solution of copper in the same acid; about three fourths of the generated air disappearing on the admission of water; and the remainder being inflammable. the solutions of iron, tin, and zinc, in the marine acid, were all attended with the same phænomena as the solutions of copper and lead, but in a less degree; for in iron one eighth, in tin one sixth, and in zinc one tenth of the generated air disappeared on the admission of water. the remainder of the air from iron, in this case, burned with a green, or very light blue flame. i had always thought it something extraordinary that a species of air should _lose its elasticity_ by the mere _contact_ of any thing, and from the first suspected that it must have been _imbibed_ by the water that was admitted to it; but so very great a quantity of this air disappeared upon the admission of a very small quantity of water, that at first i could not help concluding that appearances favoured the former hypothesis. i found, however, that when i admitted a much smaller quantity of water, confined in a narrow glass tube, a part only of the air disappeared, and that very slowly, and that more of it vanished upon the admission of more water. this observation put it beyond a doubt, that this air was properly _imbibed_ by the water, which, being once fully saturated with it, was not capable of receiving any more. the water thus impregnated tasted very acid, even when it was much diluted with other water, through which the tube containing it was drawn. it even dissolved iron very fast, and generated inflammable air. this last observation, together with another which immediately follows, led me to the discovery of the true nature of this remarkable kind of air. happening, at one time, to use a good deal of copper and a small quantity of spirit of salt, in the generation of this kind of air, i was surprized to find that air was produced long after, i could not but think that the acid must have been saturated with the metal; and i also found that the proportion of inflammable air to that which was absorbed by the water continually diminished, till, instead of being one fourth of the whole, as i had first observed, it was not so much as one twentieth. upon this, i concluded that this subtle air did not arise from the copper, but from the spirit of salt; and presently making the experiment with the acid only, without any copper, or metal of any kind, this air was immediately produced in as great plenty as before; so that this remarkable kind of air is, in fact, nothing more than the vapour, or fumes of spirit of salt, which appear to be of such a nature, that they are not liable to be condensed by cold, like the vapour of water, and other fluids, and therefore may be very properly called an _acid air_, or more restrictively, the _marine acid air_. this elastic acid vapour, or acid air, extinguishes flame, and is much heavier than common air; but how much heavier, will not be easy to ascertain. a cylindrical glass vessel, about three fourths of an inch in diameter, and four inches deep, being filled with it, and turned upside down, a lighted candle may be let down into it more than twenty times before it will burn at the bottom. it is pleasing to observe the colour of the flame in this experiment; for both before the candle goes out, and also when it is first lighted again, it burns with a beautiful green, or rather light-blue flame, such as is seen when common salt is thrown into the fire. when this air is all expelled from any quantity of spirit of salt, which is easily perceived by the subsequent vapour being condensed by cold, the remainder is a very weak acid, barely capable of dissolving iron. being now in the possession of a new subject of experiments, viz. an elastic acid vapour, in the form of a permanent air, easily procured, and effectually confined by glass and quicksilver, with which it did not seem to have any affinity; i immediately began to introduce a variety of substances to it; in order to ascertain its peculiar properties and affinities, and also the properties of those other bodies with respect to it. beginning with _water_, which, from preceding observations, i knew would imbibe it, and become impregnated with it; i found that - / grains of rain-water absorbed three ounce measures of this air, after which it was increased one third in its bulk, and weighed twice as much as before; so that this concentrated vapour seems to be twice as heavy as rain-water: water impregnated with it makes the strongest spirit of salt that i have seen, dissolving iron with the most rapidity. consequently, two thirds of the best spirit of salt is nothing more than mere phlegm or water. iron filings, being admitted to this air, were dissolved by it pretty fast, half of the air disappearing, and the other half becoming inflammable air, not absorbed by water. putting chalk to it, fixed air was produced. i had not introduced many substances to this air, before i discovered that it had an affinity with _phlogiston_, so that it would deprive other substances of it, and form with it such an union as constitutes inflammable air; which seems to shew, that inflammable air universally consists of the union of some acid vapour with phlogiston. inflammable air was produced, when to this acid air i put spirit of wine, oil of olives, oil of turpentine, charcoal, phosphorus, bees-wax, and even sulphur. this last observation, i own, surprized me; for, the marine acid being reckoned the weakest of the three mineral acids, i did not think that it had been capable of dislodging the oil of vitriol from this substance; but i found that it had the very same effect both upon alum and nitre; the vitriolic acid in the former case, and the nitrous in the latter, giving place to the stronger vapour of spirit of salt. the rust of iron, and the precipitate of nitrous air made from copper, also imbibed this air very fast, and the little that remained of it was inflammable air; which proves, that these calces contain phlogiston. it seems also to be pretty evident, from this experiment, that the precipitate above mentioned is a real calx of the metal, by the solution of which the nitrous air is generated. as some remarkable circumstances attend the absorption of this acid air, by the substances above-mentioned, i shall briefly mention them. spirit of wine absorbs this air as readily as water itself, and is increased in bulk by that means. also, when it is saturated, it dissolves iron with as much rapidity, and still continues inflammable. oil of olives absorbs this air very slowly, and at the same time, it turns almost black, and becomes glutinous. it is also less miscible with water, and acquires a very disagreeable smell. by continuing upon the surface of the water, it became white, and its offensive smell went off in a few days. oil of turpentine absorbed this air very fast, turning brown, and almost black. no inflammable air was formed, till i raised more of the acid air than the oil was able to absorb, and let it stand a considerable time; and still the air was but weakly inflammable. the same was the case with the oil of olives, in the last mentioned experiment; and it seems to be probable, that, the longer this acid air had continued in contact with the oil, the more phlogiston it would have extracted from it. it is not wholly improbable, but that, in the intermediate state, before it becomes inflammable air, it may be nearly of the nature of common air. bees-wax absorbed this air very slowly. about the bigness of a hazel-nut of the wax being put to three ounce measures of the acid air, the air was diminished one half in two days, and, upon the admission of water, half of the remainder also disappeared. this air was strongly inflammable. charcoal absorbed this air very fast. about one fourth of it was rendered immiscible in water, and was but weakly inflammable. a small bit of _phosphorus_, perhaps about half a grain, smoked, and gave light in the acid air, just as it would have done in common air confined. it was not sensibly wasted after continuing about twelve hours in that state, and the bulk of the air was very little diminished. water being admitted to it absorbed it as before, except about one fifth of the whole. it was but weakly inflammable. putting several pieces of _sulphur_ to this air, it was absorbed but slowly. in about twenty-four hours about one fifth of the quantity had disappeared; and water being admitted to the remainder, very little more was absorbed. the remainder was inflammable, and burned with a blue flame. notwithstanding the affinity which this acid air appears to have with phlogiston, it is not capable of depriving all bodies of it. i found that dry wood, crusts of bread, and raw flesh, very readily imbibed this air, but did not part with any of their phlogiston to it. all these substances turned very brown, after they had been some time exposed to this air, and tasted very strongly of the acid when they were taken out; but the flesh, when washed in water, became very white, and the fibres easily separated from one another, even more than they would have done if it had been boiled or roasted[ ]. when i put a piece of _saltpetre_ to this air it was presently surrounded with a white fume, which soon filled the whole vessel, exactly like the fume which bursts from the bubbles of nitrous air, when it is generated by a vigorous fermentation, and such as is seen when nitrous air is mixed with this acid air. in about a minute, the whole quantity of air was absorbed, except a very little, which might be the common air that had lodged upon the surface of the spirit of salt within the phial. a piece of _alum_ exposed to this air turned yellow, absorbed it as fast as the saltpetre had done, and was reduced by it to the form of a powder. common salt, as might be expected, had no effect whatever on this marine acid air. i had also imagined, that if air diminished by the processes above-mentioned was affected in this manner, in consequence of its being saturated with phlogiston, a mixture of this acid air might imbibe that phlogiston, and render it wholesome again; but i put about one fourth of this air to a quantity of air in which metals had been calcined, without making any sensible alteration in it. i do not, however, infer from this, that air is not diminished by means of phlogiston, since the common air, like some other substances, may hold the phlogiston too fast, to be deprived of it by this acid air. i shall conclude my account of these experiments with observing, that the electric spark is visible in acid air, exactly as it is in common air; and though i kept making this spark a considerable time in a quantity of it, i did not perceive that any sensible alteration was made in it. a little inflammable air was produced, but not more than might have come from the two iron nails which i made use of in taking the sparks. footnotes: [ ] it will be seen, in the second part of this work, that, in some of these processes, i had afterwards more success. section x. miscellaneous observations. . as many of the preceding observations relate to the _vinous_ and _putrefactive_ fermentations, i had the curiosity to endeavour to ascertain in what manner the air would be affected by the _acetous_ fermentation. for this purpose i inclosed a phial full of small beer in a jar standing in water; and observed that, during the first two or three days, there was an increase of the air in the jar, but from that time it gradually decreased, till at length there appeared to be a diminution of about one tenth of the whole quantity. during this time the whole surface of it was gradually covered with a scum, beautifully corrugated. after this there was an increase of the air till there was more than the original quantity; but this must have been fixed air, not incorporated with the rest of the mass; for, withdrawing the beer, which i found to be sour, after it had stood or days under the jar, and passing the air several times through cold water, the original quantity was diminished about one ninth. in the remainder a candle would not burn, and a mouse would have died presently. the smell of this air was exceedingly pungent, but different from that of the putrid effluvium. a mouse lived perfectly well in this air, thus affected with the acetous fermentation; after it had stood several days mixed with four times the quantity of fixed air. . all the kinds of factitious air on which i have yet made the experiment are highly noxious, except that which is extracted from saltpetre, or alum; but in this even a candle burned just as in common air[ ]. in one quantity which i got from saltpetre a candle not only burned, but the flame was increased, and something was heard like a hissing, similar to the decrepitation of nitre in an open fire. this experiment was made when the air was fresh made, and while it probably contained some particles of nitre, which would have been deposited afterwards. the air was extracted from these substances by heating them in a gun-barrel, which was much corroded and soon spoiled by the experiment. what effect this circumstance may have had upon the air i have not considered. november , , i had the curiosity to examine the state of a quantity of this air which had been extracted from saltpetre above a year, and which at first was perfectly wholesome; when, to my very great surprize, i found that it was become, in the highest degree, noxious. it made no effervescence with nitrous air, and a mouse died the moment it was put into it. i had not, however, washed it in rain-water quite ten minutes (and perhaps less time would have been sufficient) when i found, upon trial, that it was restored to its former perfectly wholesome state. it effervesced with nitrous air as much as the best common air ever does; and even a candle burned in it very well, which i had never before observed of any kind of noxious air meliorated by agitation in water. this series of facts, relating to air extracted from nitre, appear to me to be very extraordinary and important, and, in able hands, may lead to considerable discoveries. . there are many substances which impregnate common air in a very remarkable manner, but without making it noxious to animals. among other things i tried volatile alkaline salts, and camphor; the latter of which i melted with a burning-glass, in air inclosed in a phial. the mouse, which was put into this air, sneezed and coughed very much, especially after it was taken out; but it presently recovered, and did not appear to have been sensibly injured. . having made several experiments with a mixture of iron filings and brimstone, kneaded to a paste with water, i had the curiosity to try what would be the effect of substituting _brass dust_ in the place of the iron filings. the result was, that when this mixture had stood about three weeks, in a given quantity of air, it had turned black, but was not increased in bulk. the air also was neither sensibly increased nor decreased, but the nature of it was changed; for it extinguished flame, it would have killed a mouse presently, and was not restored by fixed air, which had been mixed with it several days. . i have frequently mentioned my having, at one time, exposed equal quantities of different kinds of air in jars standing in boiled water. _common air_ in this experiment was diminished four sevenths, and the remainder extinguished flame. this experiment demonstrates that water does not absorb air equally, but that it decomposes it, taking one part, and leaving the rest. to be quite sure of this fact, i agitated a quantity of common air in boiled water, and when i had reduced it from eleven ounce measures to seven, i found that it extinguished a candle, but a mouse lived in it very well. at another time a candle barely went out when the air was diminished one third, and at other times i have found this effect lake place at other very different degrees of diminution. this difference i attribute to the differences in the state of the water with respect to the air contained in it; for sometimes it had stood longer than at other times before i made use of it. i also used distilled-water, rain-water, and water out of which the air had been pumped, promiscuously with rain water. i even doubt, not but that, in a certain state of the water, there might be no sensible difference in the bulk of the agitated air, and yet at the end of the process it would extinguish a candle, air being supplied from the water in the place of that part of the common air which had been absorbed. it is certainly a little extraordinary that the very same process should so far mend putrid air, as to reduce it to the standard of air in which candles have burned out; and yet that it should so far injure common and wholesome air as to reduce it to about the same standard: but so the fact certainly is. if air extinguish flame in consequence of its being previously saturated with phlogiston, it must, in this case, have been transferred from the water to the air, and it is by no means inconsistent with this hypothesis to suppose, that, if the air be over saturated with phlogiston, the water will imbibe it, till it be reduced to the same proportion that agitation in water would have communicated to it. to a quantity of common air, thus diminished by agitation in water, till it extinguished a candle, i put a plant, but it did not so far restore it as that a candle would burn in it again; which to me appeared not a little extraordinary, as it did not seem to be in a worse state than air in which candles had burned out, and which had never failed to be restored by the same means. i had no better success with a quantity of permanent air which i had collected from my pump-water. indeed these experiments were begun before i was acquainted with that property of nitrous air, which makes it so accurate a measure of the goodness of other kinds of air; and it might perhaps be rather too late in the year when i made the experiments. having neglected these two jars of air, the plants died and putrefied in both of them; and then i found the air in them both to be highly noxious, and to make no effervescence with nitrous air. i found that a pint of my pump-water contained about one fourth of an ounce measure of air, one half of which was afterwards absorbed by standing in fresh pump-water. a candle would not burn in this air, but a mouse lived in it very well. upon the whole, it seemed to be in about the same state as air in which a candle had burned out. . i once imagined that, by mere _stagnation_, air might become unfit for respiration, or at least the burning of candles; but if this be the case, and the change be produced gradually, it must require a long time for the purpose. for on the d of september , i examined a quantity of common air, which had been kept in a phial, without agitation, from may , and found it to be in no respect worse than fresh air, even by the test of the nitrous air. . the crystallization of nitre makes no sensible alteration in the air in which the process is made. for this purpose i dissolved as much nitre as a quantity of hot water would contain, and let it cool under a receiver, standing in water. . november , , a quantity of inflammable air, which, by long keeping, had come to extinguish flame, i observed to smell very much like common air in which a mixture of iron filings and brimstone had stood. it was not, however, quite so strong, but it was equally noxious. . bismuth and nickel are dissolved in the marine acid with the application of a considerable degree of heat; but little or no air is got from either of them; but, what i thought a little remarkable, both of them smelled very much like harrowgate water, or liver of sulphur. this smell i have met with several times in the course of my experiments, and in processes very different from one another. footnotes: [ ] experiments, of which an account will be given in the second part of this work, make it probable, that though a candle burned even _more than well_ in this air, an animal would not have lived in it. at the time of this first publication, however, i had no idea of this being possible in nature. part ii. _experiments and observations made in the year , and the beginning of ._ section i. _observations on alkaline air._ after i had made the discovery of the _marine acid air_, which the vapour of spirit of salt may properly enough be called, and had made those experiments upon it, of which i have given an account in the former part of this work, and others which i propose to recite in this part; it occurred to me, that, by a process similar to that by which this _acid_ air is expelled from the spirit of salt, an _alkaline_ air might be expelled from substances containing volatile alkali. accordingly i procured some volatile spirit of sal ammoniac, and having put it into a thin phial, and heated it with the flame of a candle, i presently found that a great quantity of vapour was discharged from it; and being received in a vessel of quicksilver, standing in a bason of quicksilver, it continued in the form of a transparent and permanent air, not at all condensed by cold; so that i had the same opportunity of making experiments upon it, as i had before on the acid air, being in the same favourable circumstances. with the same ease i also procured this air from _spirit of hartshorn_, and _sal volatile_ either in a fluid or solid form, i. e. from those volatile alkaline salts which are produced by the distillation of sal ammoniac with fixed alkalis. but in this case i soon found that the alkaline air i procured was not pure; for the fixed air, which entered into the composition of my materials, was expelled along with it. also, uniting again with the alkaline air, in the glass tube through which they were conveyed, they stopped it up, and were often the means of bursting my vessels. while these experiments were new to me, i imagined that i was able to procure this air with peculiar advantage and in the greatest abundance, either from the salts in a dry state, when they were just covered with water, or in a perfectly fluid state; for, upon applying a candle to the phials in which they were contained, there was a most astonishing production of air; but having examined it, i found it to be chiefly fixed air, especially after the first or second produce from the same materials; and removing my apparatus to a trough of water and using the water instead of quicksilver, i found that it was not presently absorbed by it. this, however, appears to be an easy and elegant method of procuring fixed air, from a small quantity of materials, though there must be a mixture of alkaline air along with it; as it is by means of its combination with this principle only, that it is possible, that so much fixed air should be retained in any liquid. water, at least, we know, cannot be made to contain much more than its own bulk of fixed air. after this disappointment, i confined myself to the use of that volatile spirit of sal ammoniac which is procured by a distillation with slaked lime, which contains no fixed air; and which seems, in a general state, to contain about as much alkaline air, as an equal quantity of spirit of salt contains of the acid air. wanting, however, to procure this air in greater quantities, and this method being rather expensive, it occurred to me, that alkaline air might, probably, be procured, with the most ease and convenience, from the original materials, mixed in the same proportions that chemists had found by experience to answer the best for the production of the volatile spirit of sal ammoniac. accordingly i mixed one fourth of pounded sal ammoniac, with three fourths of slaked lime; and filling a phial with the mixture, i presently found it completely answered my purpose. the heat of a candle expelled from this mixture a prodigious quantity of alkaline air; and the same materials (as much as filled an ounce phial) would serve me a considerable time, without changing; especially when, instead of a glass phial, i made use of a small iron tube, which i find much more convenient for the purpose. as water soon begins to rise in this process, it is necessary, if the air is intended to be conveyed perfectly _dry_ into the vessel of quicksilver, to have a small vessel in which this water (which is the common volatile spirit of sal ammoniac) may be received. this small vessel must be interposed between the vessel which contains the materials for the generation of the air, and that in which it is to be received, as _d_ fig. . this _alkaline_ air being perfectly analogous to the _acid_ air, i was naturally led to investigate the properties of it in the same manner, and nearly in the same order. from this analogy i concluded, as i presently found to be the fact, that this alkaline air would be readily imbibed by water, and, by its union with it, would form a volatile spirit of sal ammoniac. and as the water, when admitted to the air in this manner, confined by quicksilver, has an opportunity of fully saturating itself with the alkaline vapour, it is made prodigiously stronger than any volatile spirit of sal ammoniac that i have ever seen; and i believe stronger than it can be made in the common way. in order to ascertain what addition, with respect to quantity and weight, water would acquire by being saturated with alkaline air, i put - / grains of rain-water into a small glass tube, closed at one end with cement, and open at the other, the column of water measuring / of an inch; and having introduced it through the quicksilver into a vessel containing alkaline air, observed that it absorbed / of an ounce measure of the _air_, and had then gained about half a grain in weight, and was increased to - / tenths of an inch in length. i did not make a second experiment of this kind, and therefore will not answer for the exactness of these proportions in future trials. what i did sufficiently answered my purpose, in a general view of the subject. when i had, at one time, saturated a quantity of distilled water with alkaline air, so that a good deal of the air remained unabsorbed on the surface of the water, i observed that, as i continued to throw up more air, a considerable proportion of it was imbibed, but not the whole; and when i had let the apparatus stand a day, much more of the air that lay on the surface was imbibed. and after the water would imbibe no more of the _old_ air, it imbibed _new_. this shews that water requires a considerable time to saturate itself with this kind of air, and that part of it more readily unites with water than the rest. the same is also, probably, the case with all the kinds of air with which water can be impregnated. mr. cavendish made this observation with respect to fixed air, and i repeated the whole process above-mentioned with acid air, and had precisely the same result. the alkaline water which i procured in this experiment was, beyond comparison, stronger to the smell, than any spirit of sal ammoniac that i had seen. this experiment led me to attempt the making of spirit of sal ammoniac in a larger quantity, by impregnating distilled water with this alkaline air. for this purpose i filled a piece of a gun-barrel with the materials above-mentioned, and luted to the open end of it a small glass tube, one end of which was bent, and put within the mouth of a glass vessel, containing a quantity of distilled water upon quicksilver, standing in a bason of quicksilver, as in fig. . in these circumstances the heat of the fire, applied gradually, expelled the alkaline air, which, passing through the tube, and the quicksilver, came at last to the water, which, in time, became fully saturated with it. by this means i got a very strong alkaline liquor, from which i could again expel the alkaline air which i had put into it, whenever it happened to be more convenient to me to get it in that manner. this process may easily be performed in a still larger way; and by this means a liquor of the same nature with the volatile spirit of sal ammoniac, might be made much stronger, and much cheaper, than it is now made. having satisfied myself with respect to the relation that alkaline air bears to water, i was impatient to find what would be the consequence of mixing this new air with the other kinds with which i was acquainted before, and especially with _acid_ air; having a notion that these two airs, being of opposite natures, might compose a _neutral air_, and perhaps the very same thing with common air. but the moment that these two kinds of air came into contact, a beautiful white cloud was formed, and presently filled the whole vessel in which they were contained. at the same time the quantity of air began to diminish, and, at length, when the cloud was subsided, there appeared to be formed a solid _while salt_, which was found to be the common _sal ammoniac_, or the marine acid united to the volatile alkali. the first quantity that i produced immediately deliquesced, upon being exposed to the common air; but if it was exposed in a very dry and warm place, it almost all evaporated, in a white cloud. i have, however, since, from the same materials, produced the salt above-mentioned in a state not subject to deliquesce or evaporate. this difference, i find, is owing to the proportion of the two kinds of air in the compound. it is only volatile when there is more than a due proportion of either of the constituent parts. in these cases the smell of the salts is extremely pungent, but very different from one another; being manifestly acid, or alkaline, according to the prevalence of each of these airs respectively. _nitrous air_ admitted to alkaline air likewise occasioned a whitish cloud, and part of the air was absorbed; but it presently grew clear again; leaving only a little dimness on the sides of the vessel. this, however, might be a kind of salt, formed by the union of the two kinds of air. there was no other salt formed that i could perceive. water being admitted to this mixture of nitrous and alkaline air presently absorbed the latter, and left the former possessed of its peculiar properties. _fixed air_ admitted to alkaline air formed oblong and slender crystals, which crossed one another, and covered the sides of the vessel in the form of net-work. these crystals must be the same thing with the volatile alkalis which chemists get in a solid form, by the distillation of sal ammoniac with fixed alkaline salts. _inflammable air_ admitted to alkaline air exhibited no particular appearance. water, as in the former experiment, absorbed the alkaline air, and left the inflammable air as it was before. it was remarkable, however, that the water which was admitted to them became whitish, and that this white cloud settled, in the form of a white powder, to the bottom of the vessel. alkaline air mixed with _common air_, and standing together several days, first in quicksilver, and then in water (which absorbed the alkaline air) it did not appear that there was any change produced in the common air: at least it was as much diminished by nitrous air as before. the same was the case with a mixture of acid air and common air. having mixed air that had been diminished by the fermentation of a mixture of iron filings and brimstone with alkaline air, the water absorbed the latter, but left the former, with respect to the test of nitrous air (and therefore, as i conclude, with respect to all its properties) the same that it was before. _spirit of wine_ imbibes alkaline air as readily as water, and seems to be as inflammable afterwards as before. alkaline air contracts no union with _olive oil_. they were in contact almost two days, without any diminution of the air. oil of turpentine, and essential oil of mint, absorbed a very small quantity of alkaline air, but were not sensibly changed by it. _ether_, however, imbibed alkaline air pretty freely; but it was afterwards as inflammable as before, and the colour was not changed. it also evaporated as before, but i did not attend to this last circumstance very accurately. _sulphur_, _nitre_, _common salt_, and _flints_, were put to alkaline air without imbibing any part of it; but _charcoal_, _spunge_, bits of _linen cloth_, and other substances of that nature, seemed to condense this air upon their surfaces; for it began to diminish immediately upon their being put to it; and when they were taken out the alkaline smell they had contracted was so pungent as to be almost intolerable, especially that of the spunge. perhaps it might be of use to recover persons from swooning. a bit of spunge, about as big as a hazel nut, presently imbibed an ounce measure of alkaline air. a piece of the inspissated juice of _turnsole_ was made very dry and warm, and yet it imbibed a great quantity of the air; by which it contracted a most pungent smell, but the colour of it was not changed. _alum_ undergoes a very remarkable change by the action of alkaline air. the outward shape and size remain the same, but the internal structure is quite changed, becoming opaque, beautifully white, and, to appearance, in all respects, like alum which had been roasted; and so as not to be at all affected by a degree of heat that would have reduced it to that state by roasting. this effect is produced slowly; and if a piece of alum be taken out of alkaline air before the operation is over, the inside will be transparent, and the outside, to an equal thickness, will be a white crust. i imagine that the alkaline vapour seizes upon the water that enters into the constitution of crude alum, and which would have been expelled by heat. roasted alum also imbibes alkaline air, and, like the raw alum that has been exposed to it, acquires a taste that is peculiarly disagreeable. _phosphorus_ gave no light in alkaline air, and made no lasting change in its dimensions. it varied, indeed, a little, being sometimes increased and sometimes diminished, but after a day and a night, it was in the same state as at the first. water absorbed this air just as if nothing had been put to it. having put some _spirit of salt_ to alkaline air, the air was presently absorbed, and a little of the white salt above-mentioned was formed. a little remained unabsorbed, and transparent, but upon the admission of common air to it, it instantly became white. _oil of vitriol_, also formed a white salt with alkaline air, and this did not rise in white fumes. acid air, as i have observed in my former papers, extinguishes a candle. alkaline air, on the contrary, i was surprized to find, is slightly inflammable; which, however, seems to confirm the opinion of chemists, that the volatile alkali contains phlogiston. i dipped a lighted candle into a tall cylindrical vessel, filled with alkaline air, when it went out three or four times successively; but at each time the flame was considerably enlarged, by the addition of another flame, of a pale yellow colour; and at the last time this light flame descended from the top of the vessel to the bottom. at another time, upon presenting a lighted candle to the mouth of the same vessel, filled with the same kind of air, the yellowish flame ascended two inches higher than the flame of the candle. the electric spark taken in alkaline air is red, as it is in common inflammable air. though alkaline air be inflammable, it appeared, by the following experiment, to be heavier than the common inflammable air, as well as to contract no union with it. into a vessel containing a quantity of inflammable air, i put half as much alkaline air, and then about the same quantity of acid air. these immediately formed a white cloud, but it did not rise within the space that was occupied by the inflammable air; so that this latter had kept its place above the alkaline air, and had not mixed with it. that alkaline air is lighter than acid air is evident from the appearances that attend the mixture, which are indeed very beautiful. when acid air is introduced into a vessel containing alkaline air, the white cloud which they form appears at the bottom only, and ascends gradually. but when the alkaline air is put to the acid, the whole becomes immediately cloudy, quite to the top of the vessel. in the last place, i shall observe that alkaline air, as well as acid, dissolves _ice_ as fast as a hot fire can do it. this was tried when both the kinds of air, and every instrument made use of in the experiment, had been exposed to a pretty intense frost several hours. in both cases, also, the water into which the ice was melted dissolved more ice, to a considerable quantity. section ii. _of common air diminished and made noxious by various processes._ it will have been observed that, in the first publication of my papers, i confined myself chiefly to the narration of the new _facts_ which i had discovered, barely mentioning any _hypotheses_ that occurred to me, and never seeming to lay much stress upon them. the reason why i was so much upon my guard in this respect was, left, in consequence of attaching myself to any hypothesis too soon, the success of my future inquiries might be obstructed. but subsequent experiments having thrown great light upon the preceding ones and having confirmed the few conjectures i then advanced, i may now venture to speak of my hypotheses with a little less diffidence. still, however, i shall be ready to relinquish any notions i may now entertain, if new facts should hereafter appear not to favour them. in a great variety of cases i have observed that there is a remarkable _diminution_ of common, or respirable air, in proportion to which it is always rendered unfit for respiration, indisposed to effervesce with nitrous air, and incapable of farther diminution from any other cause. the circumstances which produce this effect i had then observed to be the burning of candles, the respiration of animals, the putrefaction of vegetables or animal substances, the effervescence of iron filings and brimstone, the calcination of metals, the fumes of charcoal, the effluvia of paint made of white-lead and oil, and a mixture of nitrous air. all these processes, i observed, agree in this one circumstance, and i believe in no other, that the principle which the chemists call _phlogiston_ is set loose; and therefore i concluded that the diminution of the air was, in some way or other, the consequence of the air becoming overcharged with phlogiston,[ ] and that water, and growing vegetables, tend to restore this air to a state fit for respiration, by imbibing the superfluous phlogiston. several experiments which i have since made tend to confirm this supposition. common air, i find, is diminished, and rendered noxious, by _liver of sulphur_, which the chemists say exhales phlogiston, and nothing else. the diminution in this case was one fifth of the whole, and afterwards, as in other similar cases, it made no effervescence with nitrous air. i found also, after dr. hales, that air is diminished by _homberg's pyrophorus_. the same effect is produced by firing _gunpowder_ in air. this i tried by firing the gunpowder in a receiver half exhausted, by which the air was rather more injured than it would have been by candles burning in it. air is diminished by a cement made with one half common coarse turpentine and half bees-wax. this was the result of a very casual observation. having, in an air-pump of mr. smeaton's construction, closed that end of the syphon-gage, which is exposed to the outward air, with this cement (which i knew would make it perfectly air-light) instead of sealing it hermetically; i observed that, in a course of time, the quicksilver in that leg kept continually rising, so that the measures i marked upon it were of no use to me; and when i opened that end of the tube, and closed it again, the same consequence always took place. at length, suspecting that this effect must have arisen from the bit of _cement_ diminishing the air to which it was exposed, i covered all the inside of a glass tube with it, and one end of it being quite closed with the cement, i set it perpendicular, with its open end immersed in a bason of quicksilver; and was presently satisfied that my conjecture was well founded: for, in a few days, the quicksilver rose so much within the tube, that the air in the inside appeared to be diminished about one sixth. to change this air i filled the tube with quicksilver, and pouring it out again, i replaced the tube in its former situation; when the air was diminished again, but not so fast as before. the same lining of cement diminished the air a third time. how long it will retain this power i cannot tell. this cement had been made several months before i made this experiment with it. i must observe, however, that another quantity of this kind of cement, made with a finer and more liquid turpentine, had not the power of diminishing air, except in a very small proportion. also the common red cement has this property in the same small degree. common air, however, which had been confined in a glass vessel lined with this cement about a month, was so far injured that a candle would not burn in it. in a longer time it would, i doubt not, have become thoroughly noxious. iron that has been suffered to rust in nitrous air diminishes common air very fast, as i shall have occasion to mention when i give a continuation of my experiments on nitrous air. lastly, the same effect, i find, is produced by the _electric spark_, though i had no expectation of this event when i made the experiment. this experiment, however, and those which i have made in pursuance of it, has fully confirmed another of my conjectures, which relates to the _manner_ in which air is diminished by being overcharged with phlogiston, viz. the phlogiston having a nearer affinity with some of the constituent parts of the air than the fixed air which enters into the composition of it, in consequence of which the fixed air is precipitated. this i first imagined from perceiving that lime-water became turbid by burning candles over it, p. . this was also the case with lime-water confined in air in which an animal substance was putrefying, or in which an animal died, p. . and that in which charcoal was burned, p. . but, in all these cases, there was a possibility of the fixed air being discharged from the candle, the putrefying substance, the lungs of the animal, or the charcoal. that there is a precipitation of lime when nitrous air is mixed with common air, i had not then observed, but i have since found it to be the case. that there was no precipitation of lime when brimstone was burned, i observed, p. . might be owing to the fixed air and the lime uniting with the vitriolic acid, and making a salt, which was soluble in water; which salt i, indeed, discovered by the evaporation of the water. i also observed, p. , . that diminished air being rather lighter than common air is a circumstance in favour of the fixed, or the heavier part of the common air, having been precipitated. it was upon this idea, together with others similar to it, that i took so much pains to mix fixed air with air diminished by respiration or putrefaction, in order to make it fit for respiration again; and i thought that i had, in general, succeeded to a considerable degree, p. , &c. i will add, also, what i did not mention before, that i once endeavoured, but without effect, to preserve mice alive in the same unchanged air, by supplying them with fixed air, when the air in which they were confined began to be injured by their respiration. without effect, also, i confined for some months, a quantity of quick lime in a given quantity of common air, thinking it might extract the fixed air from it. the experiments which i made with electricity were solely intended to ascertain what has often been attempted, but, as far as i know, had never been fully accomplished, viz. to change the blue colour of liquors, tinged with vegetable juices, red. for this purpose i made use of a glass tube, about one tenth of an inch diameter in the inside, as in fig. . in one end of this i cemented a piece of wire _b_, on which i put a brass ball. the lower part from _a_ was filled with water tinged blue, or rather purple, with the juice of turnsole, or archil. this is easily done by an air-pump, the tube being set in a vessel of the tinged water. things being thus prepared, i perceived that, after i had taken the electric spark, between the wire _b_, and the liquor at _a_, about a minute, the upper part of it began to look red, and in about two minutes it was very manifestly so; and the red part, which was about a quarter of an inch in length, did not readily mix with the rest of the liquor. i observed also, that if the tube lay inclined while i took the sparks, the redness extended twice as far on the lower side as on the upper. the most important, though the least expected observation, however, was that, in proportion as the liquor became red, it advanced nearer to the wire, so that the space of air in which the sparks were taken was diminished; and at length i found that the diminution was about one fifth of the whole space; after which more electrifying produced no sensible effect. to determine whether the cause of the change of colour was in the _air_, or in the _electric matter_, i expanded the air which had been diminished in the tube by means of an air-pump, till it expelled all the liquor, and admitted fresh blue liquor into its place; but after that, electricity produced no sensible effect, either on the air, or on the liquor; so that it was evident that the electric matter had decomposed the air, and had made it deposite something that was of an acid nature. in order to determine whether the _wire_ had contributed any thing to this effect, i used wires of different metals, iron, copper, brass, and silver; but the result was the very same with them all. it was also the same when, by means of a bent glass tube, i made the electric spark without any wire at all, in the following manner. each leg of the tube, fig. . stood in a bason of quicksilver; which, by means of an air-pump, was made to ascend as high as _a, a_, in each leg, while the space between _a_ and _b_ in each contained the blue liquor, and the space between _b_ and _b_ contained common air. things being thus disposed, i made the electric spark perform the circuit from one leg to the other, passing from the liquor in one leg of the tube to the liquor in the other leg, through the space of air. the effect was, that the liquor, in both the legs, became red, and the space of air between them was contracted, as before. air thus diminished by electricity makes no effervescence with, and is no farther diminished by a mixture of nitrous air; so that it must have been in the highest degree noxious, exactly like air diminished by any other process. in order to determine what the _acid_ was, which was deposited by the air, and which changed the colour of the blue liquor, i exposed a small quantity of the liquor so changed to the common air, and found that it recovered its blue colour, exactly as water, tinged with the same blue, and impregnated with fixed air, will do. but the following experiment was still more decisive to this purpose. taking the electric spark upon _lime-water_, instead of the blue liquor, the lime was precipitated as the air diminished. from these experiments it pretty clearly follows, that the electric matter either is, or contains phlogiston; since it does the very same thing that phlogiston does. it is also probable, from these experiments, that the sulphureous smell, which is occasioned by electricity, being very different from that of fixed air, the phlogiston in the electric matter itself may contribute to it. it was now evident that common air diminished by any one of the processes above-mentioned being the same thing, as i have observed, with air diminished by any other of them (since it is not liable to be farther diminished by any other) the loss which it sustains, in all the cases, is, in part, that of the _fixed air_ which entered into its constitution. the fixed air thus precipitated from common air by means of phlogiston unites with lime, if any lime water be ready to receive it, unless there be some other substance at hand, with which it has a greater affinity, as the _calces of metals_. if the whole of the diminution of common air was produced by the deposition of fixed air, it would be easy to ascertain the quantity of fixed air that is contained in any given quantity of common air. but it is evident that the whole of the diminution of common air by phlogiston is not owing to the precipitation of fixed air, because a mixture of nitrous air will make a great diminution in all kinds of air that are fit for respiration, even though they never were common air, and though nothing was used in the process for generating them that can be supposed to yield fixed air. indeed, it appears, from some of the experiments, that the diminution of some of these kinds of air by nitrous air is so great, and approaches so nearly to the quantity of the diminution of common air by the same process, as to shew that, unless they be very differently affected by phlogiston, very little is to be allowed to the loss of fixed air in the diminution of common air by nitrous air. the kinds of air on which this experiment was made were inflammable air, nitrous air diminished by iron filings and brimstone, and nitrous air itself; all of which are produced by the solution of metals in acids; and also on common air diminished and made noxious, and therefore deprived of its fixed air by phlogistic processes; and they were restored to a great degree of purity by agitation in water, out of which its own air had been carefully boiled. to five parts of inflammable air, which had been agitated in water till it was diminished about one half (at which time part of it fired with a weak explosion) i put one part of nitrous air, which diminished it one eighth of the whole. this was done in lime-water, without any precipitation of lime. to compare this with common air, i mixed the same quantity, viz. five parts of this, and one part of nitrous air: when considerable crust of lime was formed upon the surface of the lime water, though the diminution was very little more than in the former process. it is possible, however, that the common air might have taken more nitrous air before it was fully saturated, so as to begin to receive an addition to its bulk. i agitated in water a quantity of nitrous air phlogisticated with iron filings and brimstone, and found it to be so far restored, that three fourths of an ounce measure of nitrous air being put to two ounce measures of it, made no addition to it. but the most remarkable of these experiments is that which i made with _nitrous air_ itself which i had no idea of the possibility of reducing to a state fit for respiration by any process whatever, at the time of my former publication on this subject. this air, however, itself, without any previous phlogistication, is purified by agitation in water till it is diminished by fresh nitrous air, and to a very considerable degree. in a pretty long time i agitated nitrous air in water, supplying it from time to time with more, as the former quantity diminished, till only one eighteenth of the whole quantity remained; in which state it was so wholesome, that a mouse lived in two ounce measures of it more than ten minutes, without shewing any sign of uneasiness; so that i concluded it must have been about as good as air in which candles had burned out. after agitating it again in water, i put one part of fresh nitrous air to five parts of this air, and it was diminished one ninth part. i then agitated it a third time, and putting more nitrous air to it, it was diminished again in the same proportion, and so a fourth time; so that, by continually repeating the process, it would, i doubt not, have been all absorbed. these processes were made in lime-water, without forming any incrustation on the surface of it. lastly, i took a quantity of common air, which had been diminished and made noxious by phlogistic processes; and when it had been agitated in water, i found that it was diminished by nitrous air, though not so much as it would have been at the first. after cleansing it a second time, it was diminished again by the same means; and, after that, a third time; and thus there can be no doubt but that, in time, the whole quantity would have disappeared. for i have never found that agitation in water, deprived of its own air, made any addition to a quantity of noxious air; though, _a priori_, it might have been imagined that, as a saturation with phlogiston diminishes air, the extraction of phlogiston would increase the bulk of it. on the contrary, agitation in water always diminished noxious air a little; indeed, if water be deprived of all its own air, it is impossible to agitate any kind of air in it without some loss. also, when noxious air has been restored by plants, i never perceived that it gained any addition to its bulk by that means. there was no incrustation of the lime-water in the above-mentioned experiment. it is not a little remarkable, that those kinds of air which never had been common air, as inflammable air, phlogisticated nitrous air, and nitrous air itself, when rendered wholesome by agitation in water, should be more diminished by fresh nitrous air, than common air which had been made noxious, and restored by the same process; and yet, from the few trials that i have made, i could not help concluding that this is the case. in this course of experiments i was very near deceiving myself, in consequence of transferring the nitrous air which i made use of in a bladder, in the manner described, p. . fig. . so as to conclude that there was a precipitation of lime in all the above-mentioned cases, and that even nitrous air itself produced that effect. but after repeated trials, i found that there was no precipitation of lime, except, in the first diminution of common air, when the nitrous air was transferred in a glass vessel. that the calces of metals contain air, of some kind or other, and that this air contributes to the additional weight of the calces, above that of the metals from which they are made, had been observed by dr. hales; and mr. hartley had informed me, that when red-lead is boiled in linseed oil, there is a prodigious discharge of air before they incorporate. i had likewise found, that no weight is either gained or lost by the calcination of tin in a close glass vessel; but i purposely deferred making any more experiments on the subject, till we should have some weather in which i could make use of a large burning lens, which i had provided for that and other purposes; but, in the mean time, i was led to the discovery in a different manner. having, by the last-recited experiments, been led to consider the electric matter as phlogiston, or something containing phlogiston, i was endeavouring to revivify the calx of lead with it; when i was surprized to perceive a considerable generation of air. it occurred to me, that possibly this effect might arise from the _heat_ communicated to the red-lead by the electric sparks, and therefore i immediately filled a small phial with the red-lead, and heating it with a candle, i presently expelled from it a quantity of air about four or five times the bulk of the lead, the air being received in a vessel of quicksilver. how much more air it would have yielded, i did not try. along with the air, a small quantity of _water_ was likewise thrown out; and it immediately occurred to me, that this water and air together must certainly be the cause of the addition of weight in the calx. it still remained to examine what kind of air this was; but admitting water to it, i found that it was imbibed by it, exactly like _fixed air_, which i therefore immediately concluded it must be[ ]. after this, i found that mr. lavoisier had completely discovered the same thing, though his apparatus being more complex, and less accurate than mine, he concluded that more of the air discharged from the calces of metals was immiscible with water than i found it to be. it appeared to me that i had never obtained fixed air more pure. it being now pretty clearly determined, that common air is made to deposit the fixed air which entered into the constitution of it, by means of phlogiston, in all the cases of diminished air, it will follow, that in the precipitation of lime, by breathing into lime-water the fixed air, which incorporates with lime, comes not from the lungs, but from the common air, decomposed by the phlogiston exhaled from them, and discharged, after having been taken in with the aliment, and having performed its function in the animal system. thus my conjecture is more confirmed, that the cause of the death of animals in confined air is not owing to the want of any _pabulum vitæ_, which the air had been supposed to contain, but to the want of a discharge of the phlogistic matter, with which the system was loaded; the air, when once saturated with it, being no sufficient _menstruum_ to take it up. the instantaneous death of animals put into air so vitiated, i still think is owing to some _stimulus_, which, by causing immediate, universal and violent convulsions, exhausts the whole of the _vis vitæ_ at once; because, as i have observed, the manner of their death is the very same in all the different kinds of noxious air. to this section on the subject of diminished, and noxious air, or as it might have been called _phlogisticated air_, i shall subjoin a letter which i addressed to sir john pringle, on the noxious quality of the effluvia of putrid marshes, and which was read at a meeting of the royal society, december , . this letter which is printed in the philosophical transactions, vol. , p. . is immediately followed by another paper, to which i would refer my reader. it was written by dr. price, who has so greatly distinguished himself, and done such eminent service to his country, and to mankind, by his calculations relating to the probabilities of human life, and was suggested by his hearing this letter read at the royal society. it contains a confirmation of my observations on the noxious effects of stagnant waters by deductions from mr. muret's account of the bills of mortality for a parish situated among marshes, in the district of vaud, belonging to the canton of bern in switzerland. to sir john pringle, baronet. dear sir, having pursued my experiments on different kinds of air considerably farther, in several respects, than i had done when i presented the last account of them to the royal society; and being encouraged by the favourable notice which the society has been pleased to take of them, i shall continue my communications on this subject; but, without waiting for the result of a variety of processes, which i have now going on, or of other experiments, which i propose to make, i shall, from time to time, communicate such detached articles, as i shall have given the most attention to, and with respect to which, i shall have been the most successful in my inquiries. since the publication of my papers, i have read two treatises, written by dr. alexander, of edinburgh, and am exceedingly pleased with the spirit of philosophical inquiry, which they discover. they appear to me to contain many new, curious, and valuable observations; but one of the _conclusions_, which he draws from his experiments, i am satisfied, from my own observations, is ill founded, and from the nature of it, must be dangerous. i mean his maintaining, that there is nothing to be apprehended from the neighbourhood of putrid marshes. i was particularly surprised, to meet with such an opinion as this, in a book inscribed to yourself, who have so clearly explained the great mischief of such a situation, in your excellent treatise _on the diseases of the army_. on this account, i have thought it not improper, to address to you the following observations and experiments, which i think clearly demonstrate the fallacy of dr. alexander's reasoning, indisputably establish your doctrine, and indeed justify the apprehensions of all mankind in this case. i think it probable enough, that putrid matter, as dr. alexander has endeavoured to prove, will preserve other substances from putrefaction; because, being already saturated with the putrid effluvium, it cannot readily take any more; but dr. alexander was not aware, that air thus loaded with putrid effluvium is exceedingly noxious when taken into the lungs. i have lately, however, had an opportunity of fully ascertaining how very noxious such air is. happening to use at calne, a much larger trough of water, for the purpose of my experiments, than i had done at leeds, and not having fresh water so near at hand as i had there, i neglected to change it, till it turned black, and became offensive, but by no means to such a degree, as to deter me from making use of it. in this state of the water, i observed bubbles of air to rise from it, and especially in one place, to which some shelves, that i had in it, directed them; and having set an inverted glass vessel to catch them, in a few days i collected, a considerable quantity of this air, which issued spontaneously from the putrid water; and putting nitrous air to it, i found that no change of colour or diminution ensued, so that it must have been, in the highest degree, noxious. i repeated the same experiment several times afterwards, and always with the same result. after this, i had the curiosity to try how wholesome air would be affected by this water; when, to my real surprise, i found, that after only one minute's agitation in it, a candle would not burn in it; and, after three or four minutes, it was in the same state with the air, which had issued spontaneously from the same water. i also found, that common air, confined in a glass vessel, in _contact_ only with this water, and without any agitation, would not admit a candle to burn in it after two days. these facts certainly demonstrate, that air which either arises from stagnant and putrid water, or which has been for some time in contact with it, must be very unfit for respiration; and yet dr. alexander's opinion is rendered so plausible by his experiments, that it is very possible that many persons may be rendered secure, and thoughtless of danger, in a situation in which they must necessarily breathe it. on this account, i have thought it right to make this communication as early as i conveniently could; and as dr. alexander appears to be an ingenuous and benevolent man, i doubt not but he will thank me for it. that air issuing from water, or rather from the soft earth, or mud, at the bottom of pits containing water, is not always unwholesome, i have also had an opportunity of ascertaining. taking a walk, about two years ago, in the neighbourhood of wakefield, in yorkshire, i observed bubbles of air to arise, in remarkably great plenty, from a small pool of water, which, upon inquiry, i was informed had been the place, where some persons had been boring the ground, in order to find coal. these bubbles of air having excited my curiosity, i presently returned, with a bason, and other vessels proper for my purpose, and having stirred the mud with a long stick, i soon got about a pint of this air; and, examining it, found it to be good, common air; at least a candle burned in it very well. i had not then discovered the method of ascertaining the goodness of common air, by a mixture of nitrous air. previous to the trial, i had suspected that this air would have been found to be inflammable. i shall conclude this letter with observing, that i have found a remarkable difference in different kinds of water, with respect to their effect on common air agitated in them, and which i am not yet able to account for. if i agitate common air in the water of a deep well, near my house in calne, which is hard, but clear and sweet, a candle will not burn in it after three minutes. the same is the case with the rain-water, which i get from the roof of my house. but in distilled water, or the water of a spring-well near the house, i must agitate the air about twenty minutes, before it will be so much injured. it may be worth while, to make farther experiments with respect to this property of water. in consequence of using the rain-water, and the well-water above mentioned, i was very near concluding, contrary to what i have asserted in this treatise, that common air suffers a decomposition by great rarefaction. for when i had collected a considerable quantity of air, which had been rarefied about four hundred times, by an excellent pump made for me by mr. smeaton, i always found, that if i filled my receivers with the water above mentioned, though i did it so gradually as to occasion as little agitation as possible, a candle would not burn in the air that remained in them. but when i used distilled water, or fresh spring-water, i undeceived myself. i think myself honoured by the attention, which, from the first, you have given to my experiments, and am, with the greatest respect, dear sir, your most obliged humble servant, london, dec. . j. priestley. postscript. i cannot help expressing my surprize, that so clear and intelligible an account, of mr. smeaton's air-pump, should have been before the public so long, as ever since the publication of the forty-seventh volume of the philosophical transactions, printed in , and yet that none of our philosophical instrument-makers should use the construction. the superiority of this pump, to any that are made upon the common plan, is, indeed, prodigious. few of them will rarefy more than times, and, in a general way, not more than or times; whereas this instrument must be in a poor state indeed, if it does not rarefy or times; and when it is in good order, it will go as far as times, and sometimes even much farther than that; besides, this instrument is worked with much more ease, than a common air-pump, and either exhausts or condenses at pleasure. in short, to a person engaged in philosophical pursuits, this instrument is an invaluable acquisition. i shall have occasion to recite some experiments, which i could not have made, and which, indeed, i should hardly have dared to attempt, if i had not been possessed of such an air-pump as this. it is much to be wished, that some person of spirit in the trade would attempt the construction of an instrument, which would do great credit to himself, as well as be of eminent service to philosophy. footnotes: [ ] on this account, if it was thought convenient to introduce a new term (or rather make a new application of a term already in use among chemists) it might not be amiss to call air that has been diminished, and made noxious by any of the processes above mentioned, or others similar to them, by the common appellation of _phlogisticated air_; and, if it was necessary, the particular process by which it was phlogisticated might be added; as common air phlogisticated by charcoal, air phlogisticated by the calcination of metals, nitrous air phlogisticated with the liver of sulphur, &c. [ ] here it becomes me to ask pardon of that excellent philosopher father beccaria of turin, for conjecturing that the phlogiston, with which he revivified metals, did not come from the electric matter itself, but from what was discharged from other pieces of metal with which he made the experiment. see history of electricity, p. , &c. this _revivification of metals_ by electricity completes the proof of the electric matter being, or containing phlogiston. section iii. _of nitrous air._ since the publication of my former papers i have given more attention to the subject of nitrous air than to any other species of air; and having been pretty fortunate in my inquiries, i shall be able to lay before my reader a more satisfactory account of the curious phenomena occasioned by it, and also of its nature and constitution, than i could do before, though much still remains to be investigated concerning it, and many new objects of inquiry are started. with a view to discover where the power of nitrous air to diminish common air lay, i evaporated to dryness a quantity of the solution of copper in diluted spirit of nitre; and having procured from it a quantity of a _green precipitate_, i threw the focus of a burning-glass upon it, when it was put into a vessel of quicksilver, standing inverted in a bason of quicksilver. in this manner i procured air from it, which appeared to be, in all respects, nitrous air; so that part of the same principle which had escaped during the solution, in the form of _air_, had likewise been retained in it, and had not left it in the evaporation of the water. with great difficulty i also procured a small quantity of the same kind of air from a solution of _iron_ in spirit of nitre, by the same process. having, for a different purpose, fired some paper, which had been dipped in a solution of copper in diluted spirit of nitre, in nitrous air, i found there was a considerable addition to the quantity of it; upon which i fired some of the same kind of paper in quicksilver and presently observed that air was produced from it in great plenty. this air, at the first, seemed to have some singular properties, but afterwards i found that it was nothing more than a mixture of nitrous air, from the precipitate of the solution, and of inflammable air, from the paper; but that the former was predominant. in the mixture of this kind of air with common air, in a trough of water which had been putrid, but which at that time seemed to have recovered its former sweetness (for it was not in the least degree offensive to the smell) a phenomenon sometimes occurred, which for a long time exceedingly delighted and puzzled me; but which was afterwards the means of letting me see much farther into the constitution of nitrous air than i had been able to see before. when the diminution of the air was nearly completed, the vessel in which the mixture was made began to be filled with the most beautiful _white fumes_, exactly resembling the precipitation of some white substance in a transparent menstruum, or the falling of very fine snow; except that it was much thicker below than above, as indeed is the case in all chemical precipitations. this appearance continued two or three minutes. at other times i went over the same process, as nearly as possible in the same manner, but without getting this remarkable appearance, and was several times greatly disappointed and chagrined, when i baulked the expectations of my friends, to whom i had described, and meant to have shewn it. this made me give all the attention i possibly could to this experiment, endeavouring to recollect every circumstance, which, though unsuspected at the time, might have contributed to produce this new appearance; and i took a great deal of pains to procure a quantity of this air from the paper above mentioned for the purpose, which, with a small burning lens, and an uncertain sun, is not a little troublesome. but all that i observed for some time was, that i stood the best chance of succeeding when i _warmed_ the vessel in which the mixture was made, and _agitated_ the air during the effervescence. finding, at length, that, with the same preparation and attentions, i got the same appearance from a mixture of nitrous and common air in the same trough of water, i concluded that it could not depend upon any thing peculiar to the precipitate of the _copper_ contained in the _paper_ from which the air was procured, as i had at first imagined, but upon what was common to it, and pure nitrous air. afterwards, having, (with a view to observe whether any crystals would be formed by the union of volatile alkali, and nitrous air, similar to those formed by it and fixed air, as described by mr. smeth in his _dissertation on fixed air_) opened the mouth of a phial which was half filled with a volatile alkaline liquor, in a jar of nitrous air (in the manner described p. . fig. .) i had an appearance which perfectly explained the preceding. all that part of the phial which was above the liquor, and which contained common air, was filled with beautiful _white clouds_, as if some fine white powder had been instantly thrown into it, and some of these clouds rose within the jar of nitrous air. this appearance continued about a minute, and then intirely disappeared, the air becoming transparent. withdrawing the phial, and exposing it to the common air, it there also became turbid, and soon after the transparency returned. introducing it again into the nitrous air, the clouds appeared as before. in this manner the white fumes, and transparency, succeeded each other alternately, as often as i chose to repeat the experiment, and would no doubt have continued till the air in the jar had been thoroughly diluted with common air. these appearances were the same with any substance that contained _volatile alkali_, fluid or solid. when, instead of the small phial, i used a large and tall glass jar, this appearance was truly fine and striking, especially when the water in the trough was very transparent. for i had only to put the smallest drop of a volatile alkaline liquor, or the smallest bit of the solid salt, into the jar, and the moment that the mouth of it was opened in a jar of nitrous air, the white clouds above mentioned began to be formed at the mouth, and presently descended to the bottom, so as to fill the whole, were it ever so large, as with fine snow. in considering this experiment, i soon perceived that this curious appearance must have been occasioned by the mixture of the nitrous and common air, and therefore that the white clouds must be _nitrous ammoniac_, formed by the acid of the nitrous air, set loose in the decomposition of it by common air, while the phlogiston, which must be another constituent part of nitrous air, entering the common air, is the cause of the diminution it suffers in this process; as it is the cause of a similar diminution, in a variety of other processes. i would observe, that it is not peculiar to nitrous air to be a test of the fitness of air for respiration. any other process by which air is diminished and made noxious answers the same purpose. liver of sulphur for instance, the calcination of metals, or a mixture of iron filings and brimstone will do just the same thing; but the application of them is not so easy, or elegant, and the effect is not so soon perceived. in fact, it is _phlogiston_ that is the test. if the air be so loaded with this principle that it can take no more, which is seen by its not being diminished in any of the processes above mentioned, it is noxious; and it is wholesome in proportion to the quantity of phlogiston that it is able to take. this, i have no doubt, is the true theory of the diminution of common air by nitrous air, the redness of the appearance being nothing more than the usual colour of the fumes, of spirit of nitre, which is now disengaged from the superabundant phlogiston with which it was combined in the nitrous air, and ready to form another union with any thing that is at hand, and capable of it. with the volatile alkali it forms nitrous ammoniac, water imbibes it like any other acid, even quicksilver is corroded by it; but this action being slow, the redness in this mixture of nitrous and common air continues much longer when the process is made in quicksilver, than when it is made in water, and the diminution, as i have also observed; is by no means so great. i was confirmed in this opinion when i put a bit of volatile alkaline salt into the jar of quicksilver in which i made the mixture of nitrous and common air. in these circumstances, the vessel being previously filled with the alkaline fumes, the acid immediately joined them, formed the white clouds above mentioned, and the diminution proceeded almost as far as when the process was made in water. that it did not proceed quite so far, i attribute chiefly to the small quantity of calx formed by the slight solution of mercury with the acid fumes not being able to absorb all the fixed air that is precipitated from the common air by the phlogiston. in part, also, it may be owing to the small quantify of surface in the quicksilver in the vessels that i made use of; in consequence of which the acid fumes could act upon it only in a slow succession, so that part of them, as well as of the fixed air, had an opportunity of forming another union with the diminished air. this, as i have observed before, was so much the case when the process was made in quicksilver, without any volatile alkali, that when water was admitted to it, after some time, it was not capable of dissolving that union, tho' it would not have taken place if the process had been in water from the first. in diversifying this experiment, i found that it appeared to very great advantage when i suspended a piece of volatile salt in the common air, previous to the admission of nitrous air to it, inclosing it in a bit of gauze, muslin, or a small net of wire. for, presently after the redness of the mixture begins to go off, the white cloud, like snow, begins to descend from the salt, as if a white powder was shaken out of the bag that contains it. this white cloud presently fills the whole vessel, and the appearance will last about five minutes. if the salt be not put to the mixture of these two kinds of air till it has perfectly recovered its transparency, the effervescence being completely over, no white cloud will be formed; and, what is rather more remarkable, there is nothing of this appearance when the salt is put into the nitrous air itself. the reason of this must be, that the acid of the nitrous air has a nearer affinity with its phlogiston than with the volatile alkali; though the phlogiston having a nearer affinity with something in the common air, the acid being thereby set loose, will unite with the alkaline vapour, if it be at hand to unite with it. there is also very little, if any white cloud formed upon holding a piece of the volatile salt within the mouth of a phial containing smoking spirit of nitre. also when i threw the focus of a burning mirror upon some sal ammoniac in nitrous air, and filled the whole vessel with white fumes which arose from it, they were soon dispersed, and the air was neither diminished nor altered. i was now fully convinced, that the white cloud which i casually observed, in the first of these experiments, was occasioned by the volatile alkali emitted from the water, which was in a slight degree putrid; and that the warming, and agitation of the vessels, had promoted the emission of the putrid, or alkaline effluvium. i could not perceive that the diminution of common air by the mixture of nitrous air was sensibly increased by the presence of the volatile alkali. it is possible, however, that, by assisting the water to take up the acid, something less of it may be incorporated with the remaining diminished air than would otherwise have been; but i did not give much attention to this circumstance. when the phial in which i put the alkaline salts contained any kind of noxious air, the opening of it in nitrous air was not followed by any thing of the appearance above mentioned. this was the case with inflammable air. but when, after agitating the inflammable air in water, i had brought it to a state in which it was diminished a little by the mixture of nitrous air, the cloudy appearance was in the same proportion; so that this appearance seems to be equally a test of the fitness of air for respiration, with the redness which attends the mixture of it with nitrous air only. having generally fastened the small bag which contained the volatile salt to a piece of brass wire in the preceding experiment, i commonly found the end of it corroded, and covered with a blue substance. also the salt itself, and sometimes the bag was died blue. but finding that this was not the case when i used an iron wire in the same circumstances, but that it became _red_, i was satisfied that both the metals had been dissolved by the volatile alkali. at first i had a suspicion that the blue might have come from the copper, out of which the nitrous air had been made. but when the nitrous air was made from iron, the appearances were, in all respects, the same. i have observed, in the preceding section, that if nitrous air be mixed with common air in _lime-water_, the surface of the water, where it is contiguous to that mixture, will be covered with an incrustation of lime, shewing that some fixed air had been deposited in the process. it is remarkable, however, as i there also just mentioned, that this is the case when nitrous air alone is put to a vessel of lime-water, after it has been kept in a _bladder_, or only transferred from one vessel to another by a bladder, in the manner described, p. . fig. . as i had used the same bladder for transferring various kinds of air, and among the rest _fixed air_, i first imagined that this effect might have been occasioned by a mixture of this fixed air with the nitrous air, and therefore took a fresh bladder; but still the effect was the same. to satisfy myself farther, that the bladder had produced this effect, i put one into a jar of nitrous air, and after it had continued there a day and a night, i found that the nitrous air in this jar, though it was transferred in a glass vessel, made lime-water turbid. whether there was any thing in the preparation of these bladders that occasioned their producing this effect, i cannot tell. they were such as i procure from the apothecaries. the thing seems to deserve farther examination, as there seems, in this case, to be the peculiar effect of fixed air from other causes, or else a production of fixed air from materials that have not been supposed to yield it, at least not in circumstances similar to these. as fixed air united to water dissolves iron, i had the curiosity to try whether fixed air alone would do it; and as nitrous air is of an _acid_ nature, as well as fixed air, i, at the same time, exposed a large surface of iron to both the kinds; first filling two eight ounce phials with nails, and then with quicksilver, and after that displacing the quicksilver in one of the phials by fixed air, and in the other by nitrous air; then inverting them, and leaving them with their mouths immersed in basons of quicksilver. in these circumstances the two phials stood about two months, when no sensible change at all was produced in the fixed air, or in the iron which had been exposed to it, but a most remarkable, and most unexpected change was made in the nitrous air; and in pursuing the experiment, it was transformed into a species of air, with properties which, at the time of my first publication on this subject, i should not have hesitated to pronounce impossible, viz. air in which a candle burns quite naturally and freely, and which is yet in the highest degree noxious to animals, insomuch that they die the moment they are put into it; whereas, in general, animals live with little sensible inconvenience in air in which candles have burned out. such, however, is nitrous air, after it has been long exposed to a large surface of iron. it is not less extraordinary, that a still longer continuance of nitrous air in these circumstances (but _how long_ depends upon too many, and too minute circumstances to be ascertained with exactness) makes it not only to admit a candle to burn in it, but enables it to burn with an _enlarged flame_, by another flame (extending every where to an equal distance from that of the candle, and often plainly distinguishable from it) adhering to it. sometimes i have perceived the flame of the candle, in these circumstances, to be twice as large as it is naturally, and sometimes not less than five or six times larger; and yet without any thing like an _explosion_, as in the firing of the weakest inflammable air. nor is the farther progress in the transmutation of nitrous air, in these circumstances, less remarkable. for when it has been brought to the state last mentioned, the agitation of it in fresh water almost instantly takes off that peculiar kind of inflammability, so that it extinguishes a candle, retaining its noxious quality. it also retains its power of diminishing common air in a very great degree. but this noxious quality, like the noxious quality of all other kinds of air that will bear agitation in water, is taken out of it by this operation, continued about five minutes; in which process it suffers a farther and very considerable diminution. it is then itself diminished by fresh nitrous air, and animals live in it very well, about as well as in air in which candles have burned out. lastly, one quantity of nitrous air, which had been exposed to iron in quicksilver, from december to january , and which happened to stand in water till january (the iron still continuing in the phial) was fired with an explosion, exactly like a weak inflammable air. at the same time another quantity of nitrous air, which had likewise been exposed to iron, standing in quicksilver, till about the same time, and had then stood in water only, without iron, only admitted a candle to burn in it with an enlarged flame, as in the cases above mentioned. but whether the difference i have mentioned in the circumstances of these experiments contributed to this difference in the result, i cannot tell. nitrous air treated in the manner above mentioned is diminished about one fourth by standing in quicksilver; and water admitted to it will absorb about half the remainder; but if water only, and no quicksilver, be used from the beginning, the nitrous air will be diminished much faster and farther; so that not more than one fourth, one sixth, or one tenth of the original quantity will remain. but i do not know that there is any difference in the constitution of the air which remains in these two cases. the water which has imbibed this nitrous air exposed to iron is remarkably green, also the phial containing it becomes deeply, and, i believe, indelibly tinged with green; and if the water be put into another vessel, it presently deposits a considerable quantity of matter, which when dry appears to be the earth or ochre of iron; from which it is evident, that the acid of the nitrous air dissolves the iron; while the phlogiston, being set loose, diminishes nitrous air, as in the process of the iron filings and brimstone. upon this hint, instead of using _iron_, i introduced a pot of _liver of sulphur_ into a jar of nitrous air, and presently found, that what i had before done by means of iron in six weeks, or two months, i could do by liver of sulphur (in consequence, no doubt, of its giving its phlogiston more freely) in less than twenty-four hours, especially when the process was kept warm. it is remarkable, however, that if the process with liver of sulphur be suffered to proceed, the nitrous air will be diminished much farther. at one time not more than one twentieth of the original quantity remained, and how much farther it right have been diminished, i cannot tell. in this great diminution, it does not admit a candle to burn in it at all; and i generally found this to be the case whenever the diminution had proceeded beyond three fourths of the original quantity[ ]. it is something remarkable, that though the diminution of nitrous air by iron filings and brimstone very much resembles the diminution of it by iron only, or by liver of sulphur, yet the iron filings and brimstone never bring it to such a state as that a candle will burn in it; and also that, after this process, it is never capable of diminishing common air. but when it is considered that these properties are destroyed by agitation in water, this difference in the result of processes, in other respects similar, will appear less extraordinary; and they agree in this, that long agitation in water makes both these kinds of nitrous air equally fit for respiration, being equally diminished by fresh nitrous air. it is possible that there would have been a more exact agreement in the result of these processes, if they had been made in equal degrees of _heat_; but the process with iron was made in the usual temperature of the atmosphere, and that with liver of sulphur generally near a fire. it may clearly, i think, be inferred from these experiments, that all the difference between fresh nitrous air, that state of it in which it is partially inflammable, or wholly so, that in which it again extinguishes candles, and that in which it finally becomes fit for respiration, depends upon some difference in the _mode of the combination_ of its acid with phlogiston, or on the _proportion_ between these two ingredients in its composition; and it is not improbable but that, by a little more attention to these experiments, the whole mystery of this proportion and combination may be explained. i must not omit to observe that there was something peculiar in the result of the first experiment which i made with nitrous air exposed to iron; which was that, without any agitation in water, it was diminished by fresh nitrous air, and that a candle burned in it quite naturally. to what this difference was owing i cannot tell. this air, indeed, had been exposed to the iron a week or two longer than in any of the other cases, but i do not imagine that this circumstance could have produced that difference. when the process is in water with iron, the time in which the diminution is accomplished is exceedingly various; being sometimes completed in a few days, whereas at other times it has required a week or a fortnight. some kinds of iron also produced this effect much sooner than others, but on what circumstances this difference depends i do not know. what are the varieties in the result of this experiment when it is made in quicksilver i cannot tell, because, on account of its requiring more time, i have not repeated it so often; but i once found that nitrous air was not sensibly changed by having been exposed to iron in quicksilver nine days; whereas in water a very considerable alteration was always made in much less than half that time. it may just deserve to be mentioned, that nitrous air extremely rarified in an air-pump dissolves iron, and is diminished by it as much as when it is in its native state of condensation. it is something remarkable, though i never attended to it particularly before i made these last experiments, and it may tend to throw some light upon them, that when a candle is extinguished, as it never fails to be, in nitrous air, the flame seems to be a little enlarged at its edges, by another bluish flame added to it, just before its extinction. it is proper to observe in this place, that the electric spark taken in nitrous air diminishes it to one fourth of its original quantity, which is about the quantity of its diminution by iron filings and brimstone, and also by liver of sulphur without heat. the air is also brought by electricity to the same state as it is by iron filings and brimstone, not diminishing common air. if the electric spark be taken in it when it is confined by water tinged with archil, it is presently changed from blue to red, and that to a very great degree. when the iron nails or wires, which i have used to diminish nitrous air, had done their office, i laid them aside, not suspecting that they could be of any other philosophical use; but after having lain exposed to the open air almost a fortnight; having, for some other purpose, put some of them into a vessel containing common air, standing inverted, and immersed in water, i was surprized to observe that the air in which they were confined was diminished. the diminution proceeded so fast, that the process was completed in about twenty-four hours; for in that time the air was diminished about one fifth, so that it made no effervescence with nitrous air, and was, therefore, no doubt, highly noxious, like air diminished by any other process. this experiment i have repeated a great number of times, with the same phials, filled with nails or wires that have been suffered to rust in nitrous air, but their power of diminishing common air grows less and less continually. how long it will be before it is quite exhausted i cannot tell. this diminution of air i conclude must arise from the phlogiston, either of the nitrous air or the iron, being some way entangled in the rust, in which the wires were encrusted, and afterwards getting loose from it. to the experiments upon iron filings and brimstone in nitrous air, i must add, that when a pot full of this mixture had absorbed as much as it could of a jar of nitrous air (which is about three fourths of the whole) i put fresh nitrous air to it, and it continued to absorb, till three or four jars full of it disappeared; but the absorption was exceedingly slow at the last. also when i drew this pot through the water, and admitted fresh nitrous air to it, it absorbed another jar full, and then ceased. but when i scraped off the outer surface of this mixture, which had been so long exposed to the nitrous air, the remainder absorbed more of the air. when i took the top of the mixture which i had scraped off and threw upon it the focus of a burning-glass, the air in which it was confined was diminished, and became quite noxious; yet when i endeavoured to get air from this matter in a jar full of quicksilver, i was able to procure little or nothing. it is not a little remarkable that nitrous air diminished by iron filings and brimstone, which is about one fourth, cannot, by agitation in water, be diminished much farther; whereas pure nitrous air may, by the same process, be diminished to one twentieth of its whole bulk, and perhaps much more. this is similar to the effect of the same mixture, and of phlogiston in other cases, on fixed air; for it so far changes its constitution, that it is afterwards incapable of mixing with water. it is similar also to the effect of phlogiston in acid air, which of itself is almost instantly absorbed by water; but by this addition it is first converted into inflammable air, which does not readily mix with water, and which, by long agitation in water, becomes of another constitution, still less miscible with water. i shall close this section with a few other observations of a miscellaneous nature. nitrous air is as much diminished both by iron filings, and also by liver of sulphur, when confined in quicksilver, as when it is exposed to water. distilled water tinged blue with the juice of turnsole becomes red on being impregnated with nitrous air; but by being exposed a week or a fortnight to the common atmosphere, in open and shallow vessels, it recovers its blue colour; though, in that time, the greater part of the water will be evaporated. this shews that in time nitrous air escapes from the water with which it is combined, just as fixed air does, though by no means so readily[ ]. having dissolved silver, copper, and iron in equal quantities of spirit of nitre diluted with water, the quantities of nitrous air produced from them were in the following proportion; from iron , from copper - / , from silver . in about the same proportion also it was necessary to mix water with the spirit of nitre in each case, in order to make it dissolve these metals with equal rapidity, silver requiring the least water, and iron the most. phosphorus gave no light in nitrous air, and did not take away from its power of diminishing common air; only when the redness of the mixture went off, the vessel in which it was made was filled with white fumes, as if there had been some volatile alkali in it. the phosphorus itself was unchanged. there is something remarkable in the effect of nitrous air on _insects_ that are put into it. i observed before that this kind of air is as noxious as any whatever, a mouse dying the moment it is put into it; but frogs and snails (and therefore, probably, other animals whose respiration is not frequent) will bear being exposed to it a considerable time, though they die at length. a frog put into nitrous air struggled much for two or three minutes, and moved now and then for a quarter of an hour, after which it was taken out, but did not recover. _wasps_ always died the moment they were put into the nitrous air. i could never observe that they made the least motion in it, nor could they be recovered to life afterwards. this was also the case in general with _spiders_, _flies_, and _butterflies_. sometimes, however, spiders would recover after being exposed about a minute to this kind of air. considering how fatal nitrous air is to insects, and likewise its great antiseptic power, i conceived that considerable use might be made of it in medicine, especially in the form of _clysters_, in which fixed air had been applied with some success; and in order to try whether the bowels of an animal would bear the injection of it, i contrived, with the help of mr. hey, to convey a quantity of it up the anus of a dog. but he gave manifest signs of uneasiness, as long as he retained it, which was a considerable time, though in a few hours afterwards he was as lively as ever, and seemed to have suffered nothing from the operation. perhaps if nitrous air was diluted either with common air, or fixed air, the bowels might bear it better, and still it might be destructive to _worms_ of all kinds, and be of use to check or correct putrefaction in the intestinal canal, or other parts of the system. i repeat it once more that, being no physician, i run no risk by such proposals as these; and i cannot help flattering myself that, in time, very great medicinal use will be made of the application of these different kinds of air to the animal system. let ingenious physicians attend to this subject, and endeavour to lay hold of the new _handle_ which is now presented them, before it be seized by rash empiricks; who, by an indiscriminate and injudicious application, often ruin the credit of things and processes which might otherwise make an useful addition to the _materia_ and _ars medica_. in the first publication of my papers, having experienced the remarkable antiseptic power of nitrous air, i proposed an attempt to preserve anatomical preparations, &c. by means of it; but mr. hey, who made the trial, found that, after some months, various animal substances were shriveled, and did not preserve their natural forms in this kind of air. footnotes: [ ] the result of several of these experiments i had the pleasure of trying in the presence of the celebrated mr. de luc of geneva, when he was upon a visit to lord shelburne in wiltshire. [ ] i have not repeated this experiment with that variation of circumstances which an attention to mr. bewley's observation will suggest. section iv. _of marine acid air._ in my former experiments on this species of air i procured it from spirit of salt, but i have since hit upon a much less expensive method of getting it, by having recourse to the process by which the spirit of salt is itself originally made. for this purpose i fill a small phial with common salt, pour upon it a small quantity of concentrated oil of vitriol, and receive the fumes emitted by it in a vessel previously filled with quicksilver, and standing in a bason of quicksilver, in which it appears in the form of a perfectly _transparent air_, being precisely the same thing with that which i had before expelled from the spirit of salt. this method of procuring acid air is the more convenient, as a phial, once prepared in this manner, will suffice, for common experiments, many weeks; especially if a little more oil of vitriol be occasionally put to it. it only requires a little more heat at the last than at the first. indeed, at the first, the heat of a person's hand will often be sufficient to make it throw out the vapour. in warm weather it will even keep smoking many days without the application of any other heat. on this account, it should be placed where there are no instruments, or any thing of metal, that can be corroded by this acid vapour. it is from dear-bought experience that i give this advice. it may easily be perceived when this phial is throwing out this acid vapour, as it always appears, in the open air, in the form of a light cloud; owing, i suppose, to the acid attracting to itself, and uniting with, the moisture that is in the common atmosphere. by this process i even made a stronger spirit of salt than can be procured in any other way. for having a little water in the vessel which contains the quicksilver, it imbibes the acid vapour, and at length becomes truly saturated with it. having, in this manner, impregnated pure water with acid air, i could afterwards expel the same air from it, as from common spirit of salt. i observed before that this acid vapour, or air, has a strong affinity with _phlogiston_, so that it decomposes many substances which contain it, and with them forms a permanently inflammable air, no more liable to be imbibed by water than inflammable air procured by any other process, being in fact the very same thing; and that, in some cases, it even dislodges spirit of nitre and oil of vitriol, which in general appear to be stronger acids than itself. i have since observed that, by giving it more time, it will extract phlogiston from substances from which i at first concluded that it was not able to do it, as from dry wood, crusts of bread not burnt, dry flesh, and what is more extraordinary from flints. as there was something peculiar to itself in the process or result of each of these experiments, it may not be improper to mention them distinctly. pieces of dry _cork wood_ being put to the acid air, a small quantity remained not imbibed by water, and was inflammable. very dry pieces of _oak_, being exposed to this air a day and a night, after imbibing a considerable quantity of it, produced air which was inflammable indeed, but in the slightest degree imaginable. it seemed to be very nearly in the state of common air. a piece of _ivory_ imbibed the acid vapour very slowly. in a day and a night, however, about half an ounce measure of permanent air was produced, and it was pretty strongly inflammable. the ivory was not discoloured, but was rendered superficially soft, and clammy, tasting very acid. pieces of _beef_, roasted, and made quite dry, but not burnt, absorbed the acid vapour slowly; and when it had continued in this situation all night, from five ounce measures of the air, half a measure was permanent, and pretty strongly inflammable. this experiment succeeded a second time exactly in the same manner; but when i used pieces of white dry _chicken-flesh_ though i allowed the same time, and in other respects the process seemed to go on in the same manner, i could not perceive that any part of the remaining air was inflammable. some pieces of a whitish kind of _flint_, being put into a quantity of acid air, imbibed but a very little of it in a day and a night; but of - / ounce measures of it, about half a measure remained unabsorbed by water, and this was strongly inflammable, taking fire just like an equal mixture of inflammable and common air. at another time, however, i could not procure any inflammable air by this means, but to what circumstance these different results were owing i cannot tell. that inflammable air is produced from _charcoal_ in acid air i observed before. i have since found that it may likewise be procured from _pit coal_, without being charred. inflammable air i had also observed to arise from the exposure of spirit of wine, and various _oily_ substances, to the vapour of spirit of salt. i have since made others of a similar nature, and as peculiar circumstances attended some of these experiments, i shall recite them more at large. _essential oil of mint_ absorbed this air pretty fast, and presently became of a deep brown colour. when it was taken out of this air it was of the consistence of treacle, and sunk in water, smelling differently from what it did before; but still the smell of the mint was predominant. very little or none of the air was fixed, so as to become inflammable; but more time would probably have produced this effect. _oil of turpentine_ was also much thickened, and became of a deep brown colour, by being saturated with acid air. _ether_ absorbed acid air very fast, and became first of a turbid white, and then of a yellow and brown colour. in one night a considerable quantity of permanent air was produced, and it was strongly inflammable. having, at one time, fully saturated a quantity of ether with acid air, i admitted bubbles of common air to it, through the quicksilver, by which it was confined, and observed that white fumes were made in it, at the entrance of every bubble, for a considerable time. at another time, having fully saturated a small quantity of ether with acid air, and having left the phial in which it was contained nearly full of the air, and inverted, it was by some accident overturned; when, instantly, the whole room was filled with a visible fume, like a white cloud, which had very much the smell of ether, but peculiarly offensive. opening the door and window of the room, this light cloud filled a long passage, and another room. in the mean time the ether was seemingly all vanished, but some time after the surface of the quicksilver in which the experiment had been made was covered with a liquor that tasted very acid; arising, probably, from the moisture in the atmosphere attracted by the acid vapour with which the ether had been impregnated. this visible cloud i attribute to the union of the moisture in the atmosphere with the compound of the acid air and ether. i have since saturated other quantities of ether with acid air, and found it to be exceedingly volatile, and inflammable. its exhalation was also visible, but not in so great a degree as in the case above mentioned. _camphor_ was presently reduced into a fluid state by imbibing acid air, but there seemed to be something of a whitish sediment in it. after continuing two days in this situation i admitted water to it; immediately upon which the camphor resumed its former solid state, and, to appearance, was the very same substance that it had been before; but the taste of it was acid, and a very small part of the air was permanent, and slightly inflammable. the acid air seemed to make no impression upon a piece of derbyshire _spar_, of a very dark colour, and which, therefore, seemed to contain a good deal of phlogiston. as the acid air has so near an affinity with phlogiston, i expected that the fumes of _liver of sulphur_, which chemists agree to be phlogistic, would have united with it, so as to form inflammable air; but i was disappointed in that expectation. this substance imbibed half of the acid air to which it was introduced: one fourth of the remainder, after standing one day in quicksilver, was imbibed by water, and what was left extinguished a candle. this experiment, however, seems to prove that acid air and phlogiston may form a permanent kind of air that is not inflammable. perhaps it may be air in such a state as common air loaded with phlogiston, and from which the fixed air has been precipitated. or rather, it may be the same thing with inflammable air, that has lost its inflammability by long standing in water. it well deserves a farther examination. the following experiments are those in which the _stronger acids_ were made use of, and therefore they may assist us farther to ascertain their affinities with certain substances, with respect to this marine acid in the form of air. i put a quantity of strong concentrated _oil of vitriol_ to acid air, but it was not at all affected by it in a day and a night. in order to try whether it would not have more power in a more condensed state, i compressed it with an additional atmosphere; but upon taking off this pressure, the air expanded again, and appeared to be not at all diminished. i also put a quantity of strong _spirit of nitre_ to it without any sensible effect. we may conclude, therefore, that the marine acid, in this form of air, is not able to dislodge the other acids from their union with water. _blue vitriol_, which is formed by the union of the vitriolic acid with copper, turned to a dark green the moment that it was put to the acid air, which it absorbed, though slowly. two pieces, as big as small nuts, absorbed three ounce measures of the air in about half an hour. the green colour was very superficial; for it was easily wiped or washed off. _green copperas_ turned to a deeper green upon being put into acid air, which it absorbed slowly. _white copperas_ absorbed this air very fast, and was dissolved in it. _sal ammoniac_, being the union of spirit of salt with volatile alkali, was no more affected with the acid air than, as i have observed before, common salt was. i also introduced to the acid air various other substances, without any particular expectation; and it may be worth while to give an account of the results, that the reader may draw from them such conclusions as he shall think reasonable. _borax_ absorbed acid air about as fast as blue vitriol, but without any thing else that was observable. fine white _sugar_ absorbed this air slowly, was thoroughly penetrated with it, became of a deep brown colour, and acquired a smell that was peculiarly pungent. a piece of _quick lime_ being put to about twelve or fourteen ounce measures of acid air, and continuing in that situation about two days, there remained one ounce measure of air that was not absorbed by water, and it was very strongly inflammable, as much so as a mixture of half inflammable and half common air. very particular care was taken that no common air mixed with the acid air in this process. at another time, from about half the quantity of acid air above mentioned, with much less quick-lime, and in the space of one day, i got half an ounce measure of air that was inflammable in a slight degree only. this experiment proves that some part of the phlogiston which escapes from the fuel, in contact with which the lime is burned, adheres to it. but i am very far from thinking that the causticity of quick-lime is at all owing to this circumstance. i have made a few more experiments on the mixture of acid air with _other kinds of air_, and think that it may be worth while to mention them, though nothing of consequence, at least nothing but negative conclusions, can be drawn from them. a quantity of common air saturated with nitrous air was put to a quantity of acid air, and they continued together all night, without any sensible effect. the quantity of both remained the same, and water being admitted to them, it absorbed all the acid air, and left the other just as before. a mixture of two thirds of air diminished by iron filings and brimstone, and one third acid air, were mixed together, and left to stand four weeks in quicksilver. but when the mixture was examined, water presently imbibed all the acid air, and the diminished air was found to be just the same that it was before. i had imagined that the acid air might have united with the phlogiston with which the diminished air was overcharged, so as to render it wholsome; and i had read an account of the stench arising from putrid bodies being corrected by acid fumes. the remaining experiments, in which the acid air was principally concerned, are of a miscellaneous nature. i put a piece of dry _ice_ to a quantity of acid air (as was observed in the section concerning _alkaline_ air) taking it with a forceps, which, as well as the air itself, and the quicksilver by which it had been confined; had been exposed to the open air for an hour, in a pretty strong frost. the moment it touched the air it was dissolved as fast as it would have been by being thrown into a hot fire, and the air was presently imbibed. putting fresh pieces of ice to that which was dissolved before, they were also dissolved immediately, and the water thus procured did not freeze again, though it was exposed a whole night, in a very intense frost. flies and spiders die in acid air, but not so quickly as in nitrous air. this surprized me very much; as i had imagined that nothing could be more speedily fatal to all animal life than this pure acid vapour. as inflammable air, i have observed, fires at one explosion in the vapour of smoking spirit of nitre, just like an equal mixture of inflammable and common air, i thought it was possible that the fume which naturally rises from common spirit of salt might have the same effect, but it had not. for this purpose i treated the spirit of salt, as i had before done the smoking spirit of nitre; first filling a phial with it, then inverting it in a vessel containing a quantity of the same acid; and having thrown the inflammable air into it, and thereby driven out all the acid, turning it with its mouth upwards, and immediately applying a candle to it. acid air not being so manageable as most of the other kinds of air, i had recourse to the following peculiar method, in order to ascertain its _specific gravity_. having filled an eight ounce phial with this air, and corked it up, i weighed it very accurately; and then, taking out the cork, i blew very strongly into it with a pair of bellows, that the common air might take place of the acid; and after this i weighed it again, together with the cork, but i could not perceive the least difference in the weight. i conclude, however, from this experiment, that the acid air is heavier than the common air, because the mouth of the phial and the inside of it were evidently moistened by the water which the acid vapour had attracted from the air, which moisture must have added to the weight of the phial. section v. _of inflammable air._ it will have appeared from my former experiments, that inflammable air consists chiefly, if not wholly, of the union of an acid vapour with phlogiston; that as much of the phlogiston as contributes to make air inflammable is imbibed by the water in which it is agitated; that in this process it soon becomes fit for respiration, and by the continuance of it comes at length to extinguish flame. these observations, and others which i have made upon this kind of air, have been confirmed by my later experiments, especially those in which i have connected _electrical experiments_ with those on air. the electric spark taken in any kind of _oil_ produces inflammable air, as i was led to observe in the following manner. having found, as will be mentioned hereafter, that ether doubles the quantity of any kind of air to which it is admitted; and being at that time engaged in a course of experiments to ascertain the effect of the electric matter on all the different kinds of air, i had the curiosity to try what it would do with _common air_, thus increased by means of ether. the very first spark, i observed, increased the quantity of this air very considerably, so that i had very soon six or eight times as much as i began with; and whereas water imbibes all the ether that is put to any kind of air, and leaves it without any visible change, with respect to quantity or quality, this air, on the contrary, was not imbibed by water. it was also very little diminished by the mixture of nitrous air. from whence it was evident, that it had received an addition of some other kind of air, of which it now principally consisted. in order to determine whether this effect was produced by the _wire_, or the _cement_ by which the air was confined (as i thought it possible that phlogiston might be discharged from them) i made the experiment in a glass syphon, fig. , and by that means i contrived to make the electric spark pass from quicksilver through the air on which i made the experiment, and the effect was the same as before. at one time there happened to be a bubble of common air, without any ether, in one part of the syphon, and another bubble with ether in another part of it; and it was very amusing to observe how the same electric sparks diminished the former of these bubbles, and increased the latter. it being evident that the _ether_ occasioned the difference that was observable in these two cases, i next proceeded to take the electric spark in a quantity of ether only, without any air whatever; and observed that every spark produced a small bubble; and though, while the sparks were taken in the ether itself, the generation of air was slow, yet when so much air was collected, that the sparks were obliged to pass through it, in order, to come to the ether and the quicksilver on which it rested, the increase was exceedingly rapid; so that, making the experiment in small tubes, as fig. , the quicksilver soon receded beyond the striking distance. this air, by passing through water, was diminished to about one third, and was inflammable. one quantity of air produced in this manner from ether i suffered to stand two days in water, and after that i transferred it several times through the water, from one vessel to another, and still found that it was very strongly inflammable; so that i have no doubt of its being genuine inflammable air, like that which is produced from metals by acids, or by any other chemical process. air produced from ether, mixed both with common and nitrous air, was likewise inflammable; but in the case of the nitrous air, the original quantity bore a very small proportion to the quantity generated. concluding that the inflammable matter in this air came from the ether, as being of the class of _oils_, i tried other kinds of oil, as _oil of olives_, _oil of turpentine_, and _essential oil of mint_, taking the electric spark in them, without any air to begin with, and found that inflammable air was produced in this manner from them all. the generation of air from oil of turpentine was the quickest, and from the oil of olives the slowest in these three cases. by the same process i got inflammable air from _spirit of wine_, and about as copiously as from the essential oil of mint. this air continued in water a whole night, and when it was transferred into another vessel was strongly inflammable. in all these cases the inflammable matter might be supposed to arise from the inflammable substances on which the experiments were made. but finding that, by the same process i could get inflammable air from the _volatile spirit of sal ammoniac_, i conclude that the phlogiston was in part supplied by the electric matter itself. for though, as i have observed before, the alkaline air which is expelled from the spirit of sal ammoniac be inflammable, it is so in a very slight degree, and can only be perceived to be so when there is a considerable quantity of it. endeavouring to procure air from a caustic alkaline liquor, accurately made for me by mr. lane, and also from spirit of salt, i found that the electric spark could not be made visible in either of them; so that they must be much more perfect conductors of electricity than water, or other fluid substances. this experiment well deserves to be prosecuted. i observed before that inflammable air, by standing long in water, and especially by agitation in water, loses its inflammability; and that in the latter case, after passing through a state in which it makes some approach to common air (just admitting a candle to burn in it) it comes to extinguish a candle. i have since made another observation of this kind, which well deserves to be recited. it relates to the inflammable air generated from oak the th of july , of which i have made mention before. this air i have observed to have been but weakly inflammable some months after it was generated, and to have been converted into pretty good or wholesome air by no great degree of agitation in water; but on the th of march , i found the remainder of it to be exceedingly good air. a candle burned in it perfectly well, and it was diminished by nitrous air almost as much as common air. i shall conclude this section with a few miscellaneous observations of no great importance. inflammable air is not changed by being made to pass many times through a red-hot iron tube. it is also no more diminished or changed by the fumes of liver of sulphur, or by the electric spark, than i have before observed it to have been by a mixture of iron filings and brimstone. when the electric spark was taken in it, it was confined by a quantity of water tinged blue with the juice of archil, but the colour remained unchanged. i put two _wasps_ into inflammable air, and let them remain there a considerable time, one of them near an hour. they presently ceased to move, and seemed to be quite dead for about half an hour after they were taken into the open air; but then they came to life again, and presently after seemed to be as well as ever they had been. section vi. _of fixed air._ the additions i have made to my observations on _fixed air_ are neither numerous nor considerable. the most important of them is a confirmation of my conjecture, that fixed air is capable of forming an union with phlogiston, and thereby becoming a kind of air that is not miscible with water. i had produced this effect before by means of iron filings and brimstone, fermenting in this kind of air; but i have since had a much more decisive and elegant proof of it by _electricity_. for after taking a small electric explosion, for about an hour, in the space of an inch of fixed air, confined in a glass tube one tenth of an inch in diameter, fig. , i found that when water was admitted to it, only one fourth of the air was imbibed. probably the whole of it would have been rendered immiscible in water, if the electrical operation had been continued a sufficient time. this air continued several days in water, and was even agitated in water without any farther diminution. it was not, however, common air, for it was not diminished by nitrous air. by means of iron filings and brimstone i have, since my former experiments, procured a considerable quantity of this kind of air in a method something different from that which i used before. for having placed a pot of this mixture under a receiver, and exhausted it with a pump of mr. smeaton's construction, i filled it with fixed air, and then left it plunged under water; so that no common air could have access to it. in this manner, and in about a week, there was, as near as i can recollect, one sixth, or at least one eighth of the whole converted into a permanent air, not imbibed by water. from this experiment i expected that the same effect would have been produced on fixed air by the fumes of _liver of sulphur_; but i was disappointed in that expectation, which surprised me not a little; though this corresponds in some measure, to the effect of phlogiston exhaled from this substance on acid air. perhaps more time may be requisite for this purpose, for this process was not continued more than a day and a night. iron filings and brimstone, i have observed, ferment with great heat in nitrous air, and i have since observed that this process is attended with greater heat in fixed air than in common air. though fixed air incorporated with water dissolves iron, fixed air without water has no such power, as i observed before. i imagined that, if it could have dissolved iron, the phlogiston would have united with the air, and have made it immiscible with water, as in the former instances; but after being confined in a phial full of nails from the th of december to the th of october following, neither the iron nor the air appeared to have been affected by their mutual contact. having exposed equal quantities of common and fixed air, in equal and similar cylindrical glass vessels, to equal degrees of heat, by placing them before a fire, and frequently changing their situations, i observed that they were expanded exactly alike, and when removed from the fire they both recovered their former dimensions. having had some small suspicion that liver of sulphur, besides emitting phlogiston, might also yield some fixed air (which is known to be contained in the salt of tartar from which it is made) i mixed the two ingredients, viz. salt of tartar and brimstone, and putting them into a thin phial, and applying the flame of a candle to it, so as to form the liver of sulphur, i received the air that came from it in this process in a vessel of quicksilver. in this manner i procured a very considerable quantity of fixed air, so that i judged it was all discharged from the tartar. but though it is possible that a small quantity of it may remain in liver of sulphur, when it is made in the most perfect manner, it is not probable that it can be expelled without heat. section vii. miscellaneous experiments. . it is something extraordinary that, though ether, as i found, cannot be made to assume the form of air (the vapour arising from it by heat, being soon condensed by cold, even in quicksilver) yet that a very small quantity of ether put to any kind of air, except the acid, and alkaline, which it imbibes, almost instantly doubles the apparent quantity of it; but upon passing this air through water, it is presently reduced to its original quantity again, with little or no change of quality. i put about the quantity of half a nut-shell full of ether, inclosed in a glass tube, through a body of quicksilver, into an ounce measure of common air, confined by quicksilver; upon which it presently began to expand, till it occupied the space of two ounce measures. it then gradually contracted about one sixth of an ounce measure. putting more ether to it, it again expanded to two ounce measures; but no more addition of ether would make it expand any farther. withdrawing the quicksilver, and admitting water to this air, without any agitation, it began to be absorbed; but only about half an ounce measure had disappeared after it had stood an hour in the water. but by once passing it through water the air was reduced to its original dimensions. being tried by a mixture of nitrous air, it appeared not to be so good as fresh air, though the injury it had received was not considerable. all the phenomena of dilatation and contraction were nearly the same, when, instead of common air, i used nitrous air, fixed air, inflammable air, or any species of phlogisticated common air. the quantity of each of these kinds of air was nearly doubled while they were kept in quicksilver, but fixed air was not so much increased as the rest, and phlogisticated air less; but after passing through the water, they appeared not to have been sensibly changed by the process. . spirit of wine yields no air by means of heat, the vapours being soon condensed by cold, like the vapour of water; yet when, in endeavouring to procure air from it, i made it boil, and catched the air which had rested on the surface of the spirit, and which had been expelled by the heat together with the vapour, in a vessel of quicksilver, and afterwards admitted acid air to it, the vessel was filled with white fumes, as if there had been a mixture of alkaline air along with it. to what this appearance was owing i cannot tell, and indeed i did not examine into it. . having been informed by dr. small and mr. bolton of birmingham, that paper dipped in a solution of copper in spirit of nitre would take fire with a moderate heat (a fact which i afterwards found mentioned in the philosophical transactions) it occurred to me that this would be very convenient for experiments relating to _ignition_ in different kinds of air; and indeed i found that it was easily fired, either by a burning lens, or the approach of red-hot iron on the outside of the phial in which it was contained, and that any part of it being once fired, the whole was presently reduced to ashes; provided it was previously made thoroughly dry, which, however, it is not very easy to do. with this preparation, i found that this paper burned freely in all kinds of air, but not in _vacuo_, which is also the case with gunpowder; and, as i have in effect observed before, all the kinds of air in which this paper was burned received an addition to their bulk, which consisted partly of nitrous air, from the nitrous precipitate, and partly of inflammable air, from the paper. as some of the circumstances attending the ignition of this paper in some of the kinds of air were a little remarkable, i shall just recite them. firing this paper in _inflammable_ air, which it did without any ignition of the inflammable air itself, the quantity increased regularly, till the phial in which the process was made was nearly full; but then it began to decrease, till one third of the whole quantity disappeared. a piece of this paper being put to three ounce measures of _acid_ air, a great part of it presently turned yellow, and the air was reduced to one third of the original quantity, at the same time becoming reddish, exactly like common air in a phial containing smoking spirit of nitre. after this, by the approach of hot iron, i set fire to the paper; immediately upon which there was a production of air which more than filled the phial. this air appeared, upon examination, to be very little different from pure nitrous air. i repeated this experiment with the same event. paper dipped in a solution of mercury, zinc, or iron, in nitrous acid, has, in a small degree, the same property with paper dipped in a solution of copper in the same acid. . gunpowder is also fired in all kinds of air, and, in the quantity in which i tried it, did not make any sensible change in them, except that the common air in which it was fired would not afterwards admit a candle to burn in it. in order to try this experiment i half exhausted a receiver, and then with a burning-glass fired the gunpowder which had been previously put into it. by this means i could fire a greater quantity of gunpowder in a small quantity of air, and avoid the hazard of blowing up, and breaking my receiver. i own that i was rather afraid of firing gunpowder in inflammable air, but there was no reason for my fear; for it exploded quite freely in this air, leaving it, in all respects, just as it was before. in order to make this experiment, and indeed almost all the experiments of firing gunpowder in different kinds of air, i placed the powder upon a convenient stand within my receiver, and having carefully exhausted it by a pump of mr. smeaton's construction, i filled the receiver with any kind of air by the apparatus described, p. , fig. , taking the greatest care that the tubes, &c. which conveyed the air should contain little or no common air. in the experiment with inflammable air a considerable mixture of common air would have been exceedingly hazardous: for, by that assistance, the inflammable air might have exploded in such a manner, as to have been dangerous to the operator. indeed, i believe i should not have ventured to have made the experiment at all with any other pump besides mr. smeaton's. sometimes, i filled a glass vessel with quicksilver, and introduced the air to it, when it was inverted in a bason of quicksilver. by this means i intirely avoided any mixture of common air; but then it was not easy to convey the gunpowder into it, in the exact quantity that was requisite for my purpose. this, however, was the only method by which i could contrive to fire gunpowder in acid or alkaline air, in which it exploded just as it did in nitrous or fixed air. i burned a considerable quantity of gunpowder in an exhausted receiver (for it is well known that it will not explode in it) but the air i got from it was very inconsiderable, and in these circumstances was necessarily mixed with common air. a candle would not burn in it. section viii. _queries, speculations, and hints._ i begin to be apprehensive lest, after being considered as a _dry experimenter_, i should pass, with many of my readers, into the opposite character of a _visionary theorist_. a good deal of theory has been interspersed in the course of this work, but, not content with this, i am now entering upon a long section, which contains nothing else. the conjectures that i have ventured to advance in the body of the work will, i hope, be found to be pretty well supported by facts; but the present section will, i acknowledge, contain many _random thoughts_. i have, however, thrown them together by themselves, that readers of less imagination, and who care not to advance beyond the regions of plain fact, may, if they please, proceed no farther, that their delicacy be not offended. in extenuation of my offence, let it, however, be considered, that _theory_ and _experiment_ necessarily go hand in hand, every process being intended to ascertain some particular _hypothesis_, which, in fact, is only a conjecture concerning the circumstances or the cause of some natural operation; consequently that the boldest and most original experimenters are those, who, giving free scope to their imaginations, admit the combination of the most distant ideas; and that though many of these associations of ideas, will be wild and chimerical, yet that others will have the chance of giving rise to the greatest and most capital discoveries; such as very cautious, timid, sober, and slow-thinking people would never have come at. sir isaac newton himself, notwithstanding the great advantage which he derived from a habit of _patient thinking_, indulged bold and excentric thoughts, of which his queries at the end of his book of optics are a sufficient evidence. and a quick conception of distant analogies, which is the great key to unlock the secret of nature, is by no means incompatible with the spirit of _perseverance_, in investigations calculated to ascertain and pursue those analogies. § . _speculations concerning the constituent principles of the different kinds of air, and the constitution and origin of the atmosphere, &c._ all the kinds of air that appear to me to be essentially distinct from each other are _fixed air_, _acid_ and _alkaline_; for these, and another principle, called _phlogiston_, which i have not been able to exhibit in the form of _air_, and which has never yet been exhibited by itself in _any form_, seem to constitute all the kinds of air that i am acquainted with. acid air and phlogiston constitute an air which either extinguishes flame, or is itself inflammable, according, probably, to the quantity of phlogiston combined in it, or the mode of combination. when it extinguishes flame, it is probably so much charged with the phlogistic matter, as to take no more from a burning candle, which must, therefore, necessarily go out in it. when it is inflammable, it is probably so much charged with phlogiston, that the heat communicated by a burning candle makes it immediately separate itself from the other principle with which it was united, in which separation _heat_ is produced, as in other cases of ignition; the action and reaction, which necessarily attends the separation of the constituent principles, exciting probably a vibratory motion in them. since inflammable, air, by agitation in water, first comes to lose its inflammability, so as to be fit for respiration, and even to admit a candle to burn in it, and then comes to extinguish a candle; it seems probable that water imbibes a great part of this extraordinary charge of phlogiston. and that water _can_ be impregnated with phlogiston, is evident from many of my experiments, especially those in which metals were calcined over it. water having this affinity with phlogiston, it is probable that it always contains a considerable portion of it; which phlogiston having a stronger affinity with the acid air, which is perhaps the basis of common air, may by long agitation be communicated to it, so as to leave it over saturated, in consequence of which it will extinguish a candle. it is possible, however, that inflammable air and air which extinguishes a candle may differ from one another in the _mode_ of the combination of these two constituent principles, as well as in the proportional quantity of each; and by agitation in water, or long standing, that mode of combination may change. this we know to be the case with other substances, as with _milk_, from which, by standing only, _cream_ is separated; which by agitation becomes _butter_. also many substances, being at rest, putrefy, and thereby become quite different from what they were before. if this be the case with inflammable air, the water may imbibe either of the constituent parts, whenever any proportion of it is spontaneously separated from the rest; and should this ever be that phlogiston, with which air is but slightly overcharged, as by the burning of a candle, it will be recovered to a state in which a candle may burn in it again. it will be observed, however, that it was only in one instance that i found that strong inflammable air, in its transition to a state in which it extinguishes a candle, would admit a candle to burn in it, and that was very faintly; that then the air was far from being pure, as appeared by the test of nitrous air; and that it was only from a particular quantity of inflammable air which i got from oak, and which had stood a long time in water, that i ever got air which was as pure as common air. indeed, it is much more easy to account for the passing of inflammable air into a state in which it extinguishes candles, without any intermediate state, in which it will admit a candle to burn in it, than otherwise. this subject requires and deserves farther investigation. it will also be well worth while to examine what difference the agitation of air in natural or artificial _sea-water_ will occasion. since acid air and phlogiston make inflammable air, and since inflammable air is convertible into air fit for respiration, it seems not to be improbable, that these two ingredients are the only essential principles of common air. for this change is produced by agitation in water only, without the addition of any fixed air, though this kind of air, like various other things of a foreign nature, may be combined with it. considering also what prodigious quantities of inflammable air are produced by the burning of small pieces of wood or pit-coal, it may not be improbable but that the _volcanos_, with which there are evident traces of almost the whole surface of the earth having been overspread, may have been the origin of our atmosphere, as well as (according to the opinion of some) of all the solid land. the superfluous phlogiston of the air, in the state in which it issues from volcanos, may have been imbibed by the waters of the sea, which it is probable originally covered the surface of the earth, though part of it might have united with the acid vapour exhaled from the sea, and by this union have made a considerable and valuable addition to the common mass of air; and the remainder of this over-charge of phlogiston may have been imbibed by plants as soon as the earth was furnished with them. that an acid vapour is really exhaled from the sea, by the heat of the sun, seems to be evident from the remarkably different states of the atmosphere, in this respect, in hot and cold climates. in hudson's bay, and also in russia, it is said, that metals hardly ever rust, whereas they are remarkably liable to rust in barbadoes, and other islands between the tropics. see ellis's voyage, p. . this is also the case in places abounding with salt-springs, as nantwich in cheshire. that mild air should consist of parts of so very different a nature as an acid vapour and phlogiston, one of which is so exceedingly corrosive, will not appear surprising to a chemist, who considers the very strong affinity which these two principles are known to have with each other, and the exceedingly different properties which substances composed by them possess. this is exemplified in common _sulphur_, which is as mild as air, and may be taken into the stomach with the utmost safety, though nothing can be more destructive than one of its constituent parts, separately taken, viz. oil of vitriol. common air, therefore, notwithstanding its mildness, may be composed of similar principles, and be a real _sulphur_. that the fixed air which makes part of the atmosphere is not presently imbibed by the waters of the sea, on which it rests, may be owing to the union which this kind of air also appears to be capable of forming with phlogiston. for fixed air is evidently of the nature of an acid; and it appears, in fact, to be capable of being combined with phlogiston, and thereby of constituting a species of air not liable to be imbibed by water. phlogiston, however, having a stronger affinity with acid air, which i suppose to be the basis of common air, it is not surprising that, uniting with this, in preference to the fixed air, the latter should be precipitated, whenever a quantity of common air is made noxious by an over-charge of phlogiston. the fixed air with which our atmosphere abounds may also be supplied by volcanos, from the vast masses of calcareous matter lodged in the earth, together with inflammable air. also a part of it may be supplied from the fermentation of vegetables upon the surface of it. at present, as fast as it is precipitated and imbibed by one process, it may be set loose by others. whether there be, upon, the whole, an increase or a decrease of the general mass of the atmosphere is not easy to conjecture, but i should imagine that it rather increases. it is true that many processes contribute to a great visible diminution of common air, and that when by other processes it is restored to its former wholesomeness, it is not increased in its dimensions; but volcanos and fires still supply vast quantities of air, though in a state not yet fit for respiration; and it will have been seen in my experiments, that vegetable and animal substances, dissolved by putrefaction, not only emit phlogiston, but likewise yield a considerable quantity of permanent elastic air, overloaded indeed with phlogiston, as might be expected, but capable of being purified by those processes in nature by which other noxious air is purified. that particles are continually detaching themselves from the surfaces of all solid bodies, even the metallic ones, and that these particles constitute the most permanent part of the atmosphere, as sir isaac newton supposed, does not appear to me to be at all probable. my readers will have observed, that not only is common air liable to be diminished by a mixture of nitrous air, but likewise air originally produced from inflammable air, and even from nitrous air itself, which never contained any fixed air. from this it may be inferred, that the whole of the diminution of common air by phlogiston is not owing to the precipitation of fixed air, but from a real contraction of its dimensions, in consequence of its union with phlogiston. perhaps an accurate attention to the specific gravity of air procured from these different materials, and in these different states, may determine this matter, and assist us in investigating the nature of phlogiston. in what _manner_ air is diminished by phlogiston, independent of the precipitation of any of its constituent parts, is not easy to conceive; unless air thus diminished be heavier than air not diminished, which i did not find to be the case. it deserves, however, to be tried with more attention. that phlogiston should communicate absolute _levity_ to the bodies with which it is combined, is a supposition that i am not willing to have recourse to, though it would afford an easy solution of this difficulty. i have likewise observed, that a mouse will live almost as long in inflammable air, when it has been agitated in water, and even before it has been deprived of all its inflammability, as in common air; and yet that in this state it is not, perhaps, so much diminished by nitrous air as common air is. in this case, therefore, the diminution seems to have been occasioned by a contraction of dimensions, and not by a loss of any constituent part; so that the air is really better, that is, more fit for respiration, than, by the test of nitrous air, it would seem to be. if this be the case (for it is not easy to judge with accuracy by experiments with small animals) nitrous air will be an accurate test of the goodness of _common air_ only, that is, air containing a considerable proportion of fixed air. but this is the most valuable purpose for which a test of the goodness of air can be wanted. it will still, indeed, serve for a measure of the goodness of air that does not contain fixed air; but, a smaller degree of diminution in this case, must be admitted to be equivalent to a greater diminution in the other. as i could never, by means of growing vegetables, bring air which had been thoroughly noxious to so pure a state as that a candle would burn in it, it may be suspected that something else besides _vegetation_ is necessary to produce this effect. but it should be considered, that no part of the common atmosphere can ever be in this highly noxious state, or indeed in a state in which a candle will not burn in it; but that even air reduced to this state, either by candles actually burning out in it, or by breathing it, has never failed to be perfectly restored by vegetation, at least so far that candles would burn in it again, and, to all appearance, as well, and as long as ever; so that the growing vegetables, with which the surface of the earth is overspread, may, for any thing that appears to the contrary, be a cause of the purification of the atmosphere sufficiently adequate to the effect. it may likewise be suspected, that since _agitation in water_ injures pure common air, the agitation of the sea may do more harm than good in this respect. but it requires a much more violent and longer continued agitation of air in water than is ever occasioned by the waves of the sea to do the least sensible injury to it. indeed a light agitation of air in _putrid water_ injures it very materially; but if the water be sweet, this effect is not produced, except by a long and tedious operation, whereas it requires but a very short time, in comparison, to restore a quantity of any of the most noxious kinds of air to a very great degree of wholesomeness by the same process. dr. hales found that he could breathe the same air much longer when, in the course of his respiration, it was made to pass through several folds of cloth dipped in vinegar, in a solution of sea-salt, or in salt of tartar, especially the last. statical essays, vol. . p. . the experiment is valuable, and well deserves to be repeated with a greater variety of circumstances. i imagine that the effect was produced by those substances, or by the _water_ which they attracted from the air, imbibing the phlogistic matter discharged from the lungs. perhaps the phlogiston may unite with the watery part of the atmosphere, in preference to any other part of it, and may by that means be more easily transferred to such salts as imbibe moisture. sir isaac newton defines _flame_ to be _fumus candens_, considering all _smoke_ as being of the same nature, and capable of ignition. but the smoke of common fuel consists of two very different things. that which rises first is mere _water_, loaded with some of the grosser parts of the fuel, and is hardly more capable of becoming red hot than water itself; but the other kind of smoke, which alone is capable of ignition, is properly _inflammable air_, which is also loaded with other heterogeneous matter, so as to appear like a very dense smoke. a lighted candle soon shews them to be essentially different from each other. for one of them instantly takes fire, whereas the other extinguishes a candle. it is remarkable that gunpowder will take fire, and explode in all kinds of air, without distinction, and that other substances which contain _nitre_ will burn freely in those circumstances. now since nothing can burn, unless there be something at hand to receive the phlogiston, which is set loose in the act of ignition, i do not see how this fact can be accounted for, but by supposing that the acid of nitre, being peculiarly formed to unite with phlogiston, immediately receives it. and if the sulphur, which is thereby formed, be instantly decomposed again, as the chemists in general say, thence comes the explosion of gunpowder, which, however, requires the reaction of some incumbent atmosphere, and without which the materials will only _melt_, and be _dispersed_ without explosion. nitrous air seems to consist of the nitrous acid vapour united to phlogiston, together, perhaps, with some small portion of the metallic calx; just as inflammable air consists of the vitriolic or marine acid, and the same phlogistic principle. it should seem, however, that phlogiston has a stronger affinity with the marine acid, if that be the basis of common air; for nitrous air being admitted to common air, it is immediately decomposed; probably by the phlogiston joining with the acid principle of the common air, while the fixed air which it contained is precipitated, and the acid of the nitrous air is absorbed by the water in which the mixture is made, or unites with any volatile alkali that happens to be at hand. this, indeed, is hardly agreeable to the hypothesis of most chemists, who suppose that the nitrous acid is stronger than the marine, so as to be capable of dislodging it from any base with which it may be combined; but it agrees with my own experiments on marine acid air, which shew that, in many cases, this _weaker acid_, as it is called, is capable of separating both the vitriolic and the nitrous acids from the phlogiston with which they are combined. on the other hand, the solution of metals in the different acids seems to shew, that the nitrous acid forms a closer union with phlogiston than the other two; because the air which is formed by the nitrous acid is not inflammable, like that which is produced by the oil of vitriol, or the spirit of salt. also, the same weight of iron does not yield half the quantity of nitrous air that it does of inflammable. the great diminution of nitrous air by phlogiston is not easily accounted for, unless we suppose that its superabundant acid, uniting more intimately with the phlogiston, constitutes a species of _sulphur_ that is not easily perceived or catched; though, in the process with iron, and also in that with liver of sulphur, part of the redundant phlogiston forms such an union with the acid as gives it a kind of inflammability. it appears to me to be very probable, that the spirit of nitre might be exhibited in the form of _air_, if it were possible to find any fluid by which it could be confined; but it unites with quicksilver as well as with water, so that when, by boiling the spirit of nitre, the fumes are driven through the glass tube, fig. , they instantly seize upon the quicksilver through which they are to be conveyed, and uniting with it, form a substance that stops up the tube: a circumstance which has more than once exposed me to very disagreeable accidents, in consequence of the bursting of the phials. i do not know any inquiry more promising than the investigation of the properties of _nitre_, the _nitrous acid_, and _nitrous air_. some of the most wonderful phenomena in nature are connected with them, and the subject seems to be fully within our reach. § . _speculations arising from the consideration of the similarity of the electric matter and phlogiston._ there is nothing in the history of philosophy more striking than the rapid progress of _electricity_. nothing ever appeared more trifling than the first effects which were observed of this agent in nature, as the attraction and repulsion of straws, and other light substances. it excited more attention by the flashes of _light_ which it exhibited. we were more seriously alarmed at the electrical _shock_, and the effects of the electrical _battery_; and we were astonished to the highest degree by the discovery of the similarity of electricity with _lightning_, and the _aurora borealis_, with the connexion it seems to have with _water-spouts_, _hurricanes_, and _earthquakes_, and also with the part that is probably assigned to it in the system of _vegetation_, and other the most important processes in nature. yet, notwithstanding all this, we have been, within a few years, more puzzled than ever with the electricity of the _torpedo_, and of the _anguille temblante_ of surinam, especially since that most curious discovery of mr. walsh's, that the former of these wonderful fishes has the power of giving a proper electrical shock; the electrical matter which proceeds from it performing a real circuit from one part of the animal to the other; while both the fish which performs this experiment and all its apparatus are plunged in water, which is known to be a conducting substance. perhaps, however, by considering this fact in connexion with a few others, and especially with what i have lately observed concerning the identity of electricity and phlogiston, a little light may be thrown upon this subject, in consequence of which we may be led to consider electricity in a still more important light. many of my readers, i am aware, will smile at what i am going to advance; but the apprehension of this shall not interrupt my speculations, how chimerical soever they may be thought to be. the facts, the consideration of which i would combine with that of the electricity of the torpedo, are the following. first, the remarkable electricity of the feathers of a paroquet, observed by mr. hartmann, an account of which may be seen in mr. rozier's journal for sept. . p. . this bird never drinks, but often washes itself; but the person who attended it having neglected to supply it with water for this purpose, its feathers appeared to be endued with a proper electrical virtue, repelling one another, and retaining their electricity a long time after they were plucked from the body of the bird, just as they would have done if they had received electricity from an excited glass tube. secondly, the electric matter directed through the body of any muscle forces it to contract. this is known to all persons who attend to what is called the electrical shock; which certainly occasions a proper _convulsion_, but has been more fully illustrated by father beccaria. see my _history of electricity_, p. . lastly, let it be considered that the proper nourishment of an animal body, from which the source and materials of all muscular motion must be derived, is probably some modification of phlogiston. nothing will nourish that does not contain phlogiston, and probably in such a state as to be easily separated from it by the animal functions. that the source of muscular motion is phlogiston is still more probable, from the consideration of the well known effects of vinous and spirituous liquors, which consist very much of phlogiston, and which instantly brace and strengthen the whole nervous and muscular system; the phlogiston in this case being, perhaps, more easily extricated, and by a less tedious animal process, than in the usual method of extracting it from mild aliments. since, however, the mildest aliments do the same thing more slowly and permanently, that spirituous liquors do suddenly and transiently, it seems probable that their operation is ultimately the same. this conjecture is likewise favoured by my observation, that respiration and putrefaction affect common air in the same manner, and in the same manner in which all other processes diminish air and make it noxious, and which agree in nothing but the emission of phlogiston. if this be the case, it should seem that the phlogiston which we take in with our aliment, after having discharged its proper function in the animal system (by which it probably undergoes some unknown alteration) is discharged as _effete_ by the lungs into the great common _menstruum_, the atmosphere. my conjecture suggested (whether supported or not) by these facts, is, that animals have a power of converting phlogiston, from the state in which they receive it in their nutriment, into that state in which it is called the electrical fluid; that the brain, besides its other proper uses, is the great laboratory and repository for this purpose; that by means of the nerves this great principle, thus exalted, is directed into the muscles, and forces them to act, in the same manner as they are forced into action when the electric fluid is thrown into them _ab extra_. i farther suppose, that the generality of animals have no power of throwing this generated electricity any farther than the limits of their own system; but that the _torpedo_, and animals of a similar construction, have likewise the power, by means of an additional apparatus, of throwing it farther, so as to affect other animals, and other substances at a distance from them. in this case, it should seem that the electric matter discharged from the animal system (by which it is probably more exhausted and fatigued than by ordinary muscular motion) would never return to it, at least so as to be capable of being made use of a second time, and yet if the structure of these animals be such as that the electric matter shall dart from one part of them only, while another part is left suddenly deprived of it, it may make a circuit, as in the leyden phial. as to the _manner_ in which the electric matter makes a muscle contract, i do not pretend to have any conjecture worth mentioning. i only imagine that whatever can make the muscular fibres recede from one another farther than the parts of which they consist, must have this effect. possibly, the _light_ which is said to proceed from some animals, as from cats and wild beasts, when they are in pursuit of their prey in the night, may not only arise, as it has hitherto been supposed to do, from the friction of their hairs or bristles, &c. but that violent muscular exertion may contribute to it. this may assist them occasionally to catch their prey; as glow-worms, and other insects, are provided with a constant light for that purpose, to the supply of which light their nutriment may also contribute. i would not even say that the light which is said to have proceeded from some human bodies, of a particular temperament, and especially on some extraordinary occasions, may not have been of the electrical kind, that is, produced independently of friction, or with less friction than would have produced it in other persons; as in those cases related by bartholin in his treatice _de luce animalium_. see particularly what he says concerning theodore king of the goths, p. , concerning gonzaga duke of mantua, p. , and gothofred antonius, p. : but i would not have my readers suppose that i lay much stress upon stories no better authenticated than these. the electric matter in passing through non-conducting substances always emits _light_. this light i have been sometimes inclined to suspect might have been supplied from the substance through which it passes. but i find that after the electric spark has diminished a quantity of air as much as it possibly can, so that it has no more visible effect upon it, the electric light in that air is not at all lessened. it is probable, therefore, that electric light comes from the electric matter itself; and this being a modification of phlogiston, it is probable that _all light_ is a modification of phlogiston also. indeed, since no other substances besides such as contain phlogiston are capable of ignition, and consequently of becoming luminous, it was on this account pretty evident, prior to these deductions from electrical phenomena, that light and phlogiston are the same thing, in different forms or states. it appears to me that _heat_ has no more proper connexion with phlogiston than it has with water, or any other constituent part of bodies; but that it is a state into which the parts of bodies are thrown by their action and reaction with respect to one another; and probably (as the english philosophers in general have supposed) the heated state of bodies may consist of a subtle vibratory motion of their parts. since the particles which constitute light are thrown from luminous bodies with such amazing velocity, it is evident that, whatever be the cause of such a projection, the reaction consequent upon it must be considerable. this may be sufficient not only to keep up, but also to increase the vibration of the parts of those bodies in which the phlogiston is not very firmly combined; and the difference between the substances which are called _inflammable_ and others which also contain phlogiston may be this, that in the former the heat, or the vibration occasioned by the emission of their own phlogiston, may be sufficient to occasion the emission of more, till the whole be exhausted; that is, till the body be reduced to ashes. whereas in bodies which are not inflammable, the heat occasioned by the emission of their own phlogiston may not be sufficient for this purpose, but an additional heat _ab extra_ may be necessary. some philosophers dislike the term _phlogiston_; but, for my part, i can see no objection to giving that, or any other name, to a _real something_, the presence or absence of which makes so remarkable difference in bodies, as that of _metallic calces_ and _metals_, _oil of vitriol_ and _brimstone_, &c. and which may be transferred from one substance to another, according to certain known laws, that is, in certain definite circumstances. it is certainly hard to conceive how any thing that answers this description can be only a mere _quality_, or mode of bodies, and not _substance_ itself, though incapable of being exhibited alone. at least, there can be no harm in giving this name to any _thing_, or any _circumstance_ that is capable of producing these effects. if it should hereafter appear not to be a substance, we may change our phraseology, if we think proper. on the other hand i dislike the use of the term _fire_, as a constituent principle of natural bodies, because, in consequence of the use that has generally been made of that term, it includes another thing or circumstance, viz. _heat_, and thereby becomes ambiguous, and is in danger of misleading us. when i use the term phlogiston, as a principle in the constitution of bodies, i cannot mislead myself or others, because i use one and the same term to denote only one and the same _unknown cause_ of certain well-known effects. but if i say that _fire_ is a principle in the constitution of bodies, i must, at least, embarrass myself with the distinction of fire _in a state of action_, and fire _inactive_, or quiescent. besides i think the term phlogiston preferable to that of fire, because it is not in common use, but confined to philosophy; so that the use of it may be more accurately ascertained. besides, if phlogiston and the electric matter be the same thing, though it cannot be exhibited alone, in a _quiescent state_, it may be exhibited alone under one of its modifications, when it is in _motion_. and if light be also phlogiston, or some modification or subdivision of phlogiston, the same thing is capable of being exhibited alone in this other form also. in my paper on the _conducting power of charcoal_, (see philosophical transactions, vol. . p. ) i observed that there is a remarkable resemblance between metals and charcoal; as in both these substances there is an intimate union of phlogiston with an earthy base; and i said that, had there been any phlogiston in _water_, i should have concluded, that there had been no conducting power in nature, but in consequence of an union of this principle with some base; for while metals have phlogiston they conduct electricity, but when they are deprived of it they conduct no longer. now the affinity which i have observed between phlogiston and water leads me to conclude that water, in its natural state, does contain some portion of phlogiston; and according to the hypothesis just now mentioned they must be intimately united, because water is not inflammable. i think, therefore, that after this state of hesitation and suspence, i may venture to lay it down as a characteristic distinction between conducting and non-conducting substances, that the former contain phlogiston intimately united with some base, and that the latter, if they contain phlogiston at all, retain it more loosely. in what manner this circumstance facilitates the passing of the electric matter through one substance, and obstructs its passage through another, i do not pretend to say. but it is no inconsiderable thing to have advanced but _one step_ nearer to an explanation of so very capital a distinction of natural bodies, as that into conductors and non-conductors of electricity. i beg leave to mention in this place, as favourable to this hypothesis, a most curious discovery made very lately by mr. walsh, who being assisted by mr. de luc to make a more perfect vacuum in the double or arched barometer, by boiling the quicksilver in the tube, found that the electric spark or shock would no more pass through it, than through a stick of solid glass. he has also noted several circumstances that affect this vacuum in a very extraordinary manner. but supposing that vacuum to be perfect, i do not see how we can avoid inferring from the fact, that some _substance_ is necessary to conduct electricity; and that it is not capable, by its own expansive power, of extending itself into spaces void of all matter, as has generally been supposed, on the idea of there being nothing to obstruct its passage. indeed if this was the case, i do not see how the electric matter could be retained within the body of the earth, or any of the planets, or solid orbs of any kind. in nature we see it make the most splendid appearance in the upper and thinner regions of the atmosphere, just as it does in a glass tube nearly exhausted; but if it could expand itself beyond that degree of rarity, it would necessarily be diffused into the surrounding vacuum, and continue and be condensed there, at least in a greater proportion than in or near any solid body, as newton supposed concerning his _ether_. if that mode of vibration which constitutes heat be the means of converting phlogiston from that state in which it makes a part of solid bodies, and eminently contributes to the firmness of their texture into that state in which it diminishes common air; may not that peculiar kind of vibration by which dr. hartley supposes the brain to be affected, and by which he endeavours to explain all the phenomena of sensation, ideas, and muscular motion, be the means by which the phlogiston, which is conveyed into the system by nutriment, is converted into that form or modification of it of which the electric fluid consists. these two states of phlogiston may be conceived to resemble, in some measure, the two states of fixed air, viz. elastic, or non-elastic; a solid, or a fluid. the appendix. in this appendix i shall present the reader with the communications of several of my friends on the subject of the preceding work. among them i should with pleasure have inserted some curious experiments, made by dr. hulme of halifax, on the air extracted from buxton water, and on the impregnation of several fluids, with different kinds of air; but that he informs me he proposes to make a separate publication on the subject. number i. _experiments made by mr. hey to prove that there is no oil of vitriol in water impregnated with fixed air._ it having been suggested, that air arising from a fermenting mixture of chalk and oil of vitriol might carry up with it a small portion of the vitriolic acid, rendered volatile by the act of fermentation; i made the following experiments, in order to discover whether the acidulous taste, which water impregnated with such air affords, was owing to the presence of any acid, or only to the fixed air it had absorbed. experiment i. i mixed a tea-spoonful of syrup of violets with an ounce of distilled water, saturated with fixed air procured from chalk by means of the vitriolic acid; but neither upon the first mixture, nor after standing hours, was the colour of the syrup at all changed, except by its simple dilution. experiment ii. a portion of the same distilled water, unimpregnated with fixed air, was mixed with the syrup in the same proportion: not the least difference in colour could be perceived betwixt this and the above-mentioned mixture. experiment iii. one drop of oil of vitriol being mixed with a pint of the same distilled water, an ounce of this water was mixed with a tea-spoonful of the syrup. this mixture was very distinguishable in colour from the two former, having a purplish cast, which the others wanted. experiment iv. the distilled water impregnated with so small a quantity of vitriolic acid, having a more agreeable taste than when alone, and yet manifesting the presence of an acid by means of the syrup of violets; i subjected it to some other tests of acidity. it formed curds when agitated with soap, lathered with difficulty, and very imperfectly; but not the least ebullition could be discovered upon dropping in spirit of sal ammoniac, or solution of salt of tartar, though i had taken care to render the latter free from causticity by impregnating it with fixed air. experiment v. the distilled water saturated with fixed air neither effervesced, nor shewed any clouds, when mixed with the fixed or volatile alkali. experiment vi. no curd was formed by pouring this water upon an equal quantity of milk, and boiling them together. experiment vii. when agitated with soap, this water produced curds, and lathered with some difficulty; but not so much as the distilled water mixed with vitriolic acid in the very small proportion above-mentioned. the same distilled water without any impregnation of fixed air lathered with soap without the least previous curdling. river-water, and a pleasant pump-water not remarkably hard, were compared with these. the former produced curds before it lathered, but not quite in so great a quantity as the distilled water impregnated with fixed air: the latter caused a stronger curd than any of the others above-mentioned. experiment viii. apprehending that the fixed air in the distilled water occasioned the coagulation, or separation of the oily part of the soap, only by destroying the causticity of the _lixivium_, and thereby rendering the union less perfect betwixt that and the tallow, and not by the presence of any acid; i impregnated a fresh quantity of the same distilled water with fixed air, which had passed through half a yard of a wide barometer-tube filled with salt of tartar; but this water caused the same curdling with soap as the former had done, and appeared in every respect to be exactly the same. experiment ix. distilled water saturated with fixed air formed a white cloud and precipitation, upon being mixed with a solution of _saccharum saturni_. i found likewise, that fixed air, after passing through the tube filled with alkaline salt, upon being let into a phial containing a solution of the metalic salt in distilled water, caused a perfect separation of the lead, in the form of a white powder; for the water, after this precipitation, shewed no cloudiness upon a fresh mixture of the substances which had before rendered it opaque. number ii. _a letter from mr. hey to dr. priestley, concerning the effects of fixed air applied by way of clyster._ leeds, feb. th, . reverend sir, having lately experienced the good effects of fixed air in a putrid fever, applied in a manner, i believe not heretofore made use of, i thought it proper to inform you of the agreeable event, as the method of applying this powerful corrector of putrefaction took its rise principally from your observations and experiments on factitious air; and now, at your request, i send the particulars of the case i mentioned to you, as far as concerns the administration of this remedy. january , , mr. lightbowne, a young gentleman who lives with me, was seized with a fever, which, after continuing about ten days, began to be attended with those symptoms that indicate a putrescent state of the fluids. th, his tongue was black in the morning when i first visited him, but the blackness went off in the day-time upon drinking: he had begun to doze much the preceding day, and now he took little notice of those that were about him: his belly was loose, and had been so for some days: his pulse beat strokes in a minute, and was rather low: he was ordered to take twenty-five grains of peruvian bark with five of tormentil-root in powder every four hours, and to use red wine and water cold as his common drink. th, i was called to visit him early in the morning, on account of a bleeding at the nose which had come on: he lost about eight ounces of blood, which was of a loose texture: the hæmorrhage was suppressed, though not without some difficulty, by means of tents made of soft lint, dipped in cold water strongly impregnated with tincture of iron, which were introduced within the nostrils quite through to their posterior apertures; a method which has never yet failed me in like cases. his tongue was now covered with a thick black pellicle, which was not diminished by drinking: his teeth were furred with the same kind of sordid matter, and even the roof of his mouth and sauces were not free from it: his looseness and stupor continued, and he was almost incessantly muttering to himself: he took this day a scruple of the peruvian bark with ten grains of tormentil every two or three hours: a starch clyster, containing a drachm of the compound powder of bole, without opium, was given morning and evening: a window was set open in his room, though it was a severe frost, and the floor was frequently sprinkled with vinegar. th, he continued nearly in the same state: when roused from his dozing, he generally gave a sensible answer to the questions asked him; but he immediately relapsed, and repeated his muttering. his skin was dry, and harsh, but without _petechiæ_. he sometimes voided his urine and _fæces_ into the bed, but generally had sense enough to ask for the bed-pan: as he now nauseated the bark in substance, it was exchanged for huxham's tincture, of which he took a table spoonful every two hours in a cup full of cold water: he drank sometimes a little of the tincture of roses, but his common liquors were red wine and water, or rice-water and brandy acidulated with elixir of vitriol: before drinking, he was commonly requested to rinse his mouth with water to which a little honey and vinegar had been added. his looseness rather increased, and the stools were watery, black, and foetid: it was judged necessary to moderate this discharge, which seemed to sink him, by mixing a drachm of the _theriaca andromachi_ with each clyster. st. the same putrid symptoms remained, and a _subsultus tendinum_ came on: his stools were more foetid; and so hot, that the nurse assured me she could not apply her hand to the bed-pan, immediately after they were discharged, without feeling pain on this account: the medicine and clysters were repeated. reflecting upon the disagreeable necessity we seemed to lie under of confining this putrid matter in the intestines, lest the evacuation should destroy the _vis vitæ_ before there was time to correct its bad quality, and overcome its bad effects, by the means we were using; i considered, that, if this putrid ferment could be more immediately corrected, a stop would probably be put to the flux, which seemed to arise from, or at least to be encreased by it; and the _fomes_ of the disease would likewise be in a great measure removed. i thought nothing was so likely to effect this, as the introduction of fixed air into the alimentary canal, which, from the experiments of dr. macbride, and those you have made since his publication, appears to be the most powerful corrector of putrefaction hitherto known. i recollected what you had recommended to me as deserving to be tried in putrid diseases, i mean, the injection of this kind of air by way of clyster, and judged that in the present case such a method was clearly indicated. the next morning i mentioned my reflections to dr. hird and dr. crowther, who kindly attended this young gentleman at my request, and proposed the following method of treatment, which, with their approbation, was immediately entered upon. we first gave him five grains of ipecacuanha, to evacuate in the most easy manner part of the putrid _colluvies_: he was then allowed to drink freely of brisk orange-wine, which contained a good deal of fixed air, yet had not lost its sweetness. the tincture of bark was continued as before; and the water which he drank along with it, was impregnated with fixed air from the atmosphere of a large vat of fermenting wort, in the manner i had learned from you. instead of the astringent clyster, air alone was injected, collected from a fermenting mixture of chalk and oil of vitriol: he drank a bottle of orange-wine in the course of this day, but refused any other liquor except water and his medicine: two bladders full of air were thrown up in the afternoon. d. his stools were less frequent; their heat likewise and peculiar _foetor_ were considerably diminished; his muttering was much abated, and the _subsultus tendinum_ had left him. finding that part of the air was rejected when given with a bladder in the usual way, i contrived a method of injecting it which was not so liable to this inconvenience. i took the flexible tube of that instrument which is used for throwing up the fume of tobacco, and tied a small bladder to the end of it that is connected with the box made for receiving the tobacco, which i had previously taken off from the tube: i then put some bits of chalk into a six ounce phial until it was half filled; upon these i poured such a quantity of oil of vitriol as i thought capable of saturating the chalk, and immediately tied the bladder, which i had fixed to the tube, round the neck of the phial: the clyster-pipe, which was fastened to the other end of the tube, was introduced into the _anus_ before the oil of vitriol was poured upon the chalk. by this method the air passed gradually into the intestines as it was generated; the rejection of it was in a great measure prevented; and the inconvenience of keeping the patient uncovered during the operation was avoided. th, he was so much better, that there seemed to be no necessity for repeating the clysters: the other means were continued. the window of his room was now kept shut. th, all the symptoms of putrescency had left him; his tongue and teeth were clean; there remained no unnatural blackness or _foetor_ in his stool, which had now regained their proper consistence; his dozing and muttering were gone off; and the disagreeable odour of his breath and perspiration was no longer perceived. he took nourishment to-day, with pleasure; and, in the afternoon, sat up an hour in his chair. his fever, however, did not immediately leave him; but this we attributed to his having caught cold from being incautiously uncovered, when the window was open, and the weather extremely severe; for a cough, which had troubled him in some degree from the beginning, increased, and he became likewise very hoarse for several days, his pulse, at the same time, growing quicker: but these complaints also went off, and he recovered, without any return of the bad symptoms above-mentioned. i am, reverend sir, your obliged humble servant, wm. hey. postscript october , . fevers of the putrid kind have been so rare in this town, and in its neighbourhood, since the commencement of the present year, that i have not had an opportunity of trying again the effects of fixed air, given by way of clyster, in any case exactly similar to mr. lightbowne's. i have twice given water saturated with fixed air in a fever of the putrescent kind, and it agreed very well with the patients. to one of them the aërial clysters were administred, on account of a looseness, which attended the fever, though the stools were not black, nor remarkably hot or foetid. these clysters did not remove the looseness, though there was often a greater interval than usual betwixt the evacuations, after the injection of them. the patient never complained of any uneasy distention of the belly from the air thrown up, which, indeed, is not to be wondered at, considering how readily this kind of air is absorbed by aqueous and other fluids, for which sufficient time was given, by the gradual manner of injecting it. both those patients recovered though the use of fixed air did not produce a crisis before the period at which such fevers usually terminate. they had neither of them the opportunity of drinking such wine as mr. lightbowne took, after the use of fixed air was entered upon; and this, probably, was some disadvantage to them. i find the methods of procuring fixed air, and impregnating water with it, which you have published, are preferable to those i made use of in mr. lightbowne's case. the flexible tube used for conveying the fume of tobacco into the intestines, i find to be a very convenient instrument in this case, by the method before-mentioned (only adding water to the chalk, before the oil of vitriol is instilled, as you direct) the injection of air may be continued at pleasure, without any other inconvenience to the patient, than what may arise from his continuing in one position during the operation, which scarcely deserves to be mentioned, or from the continuance of the clyster-pipe within the anus, which is but trifling, if it be not shaken much, or pushed against the rectum. when i said in my letter, that fixed air appeared to be the greatest corrector of putrefaction hitherto known, your philosophical researches had not then made you acquainted with that most remarkably antiseptic property of nitrous air. since you favoured me with a view of some astonishing proofs of this, i have conceived hopes, that this kind of air may likewise be applied medicinally to great advantage. w. h. number iii. _observations on the medicinal uses of fixed air. by thomas percival, m. d. fellow of the royal society, and of the society of antiquaries in london._ these observations on the medicinal uses of fixed air have been before published in the second volume of my essays; but are here reprinted with considerable additions. they form a part of an experimental inquiry into this interesting and curious branch of physics; in which the friendship of dr. priestley first engaged me, in concert with himself. manchester, march , . in a course of experiments, which is yet unfinished, i have had frequent opportunities of observing that fixed air may in no inconsiderable quantity be breathed without danger or uneasiness. and it is a confirmation of this conclusion, that at bath, where the waters copiously exhale this mineral spirit,[ ] the bathers inspire it with impunity. at buxton also, where the bath is in a close vault, the effects of such _effluvia_, if noxious, must certainly be perceived. encouraged by these considerations, and still more by the testimony of a very judicious physician at stafford, in favour of this powerful antiseptic remedy, i have administered fixed air in a considerable number of cases of the phthisis pulmonalis, by directing my patients to inspire the steams of an effervescing mixture of chalk and vinegar; or what i have lately preferred, of vinegar and potash. the hectic fever has in several instances been considerably abated, and the matter expectorated has become less offensive, and better digested. i have not yet been so fortunate in any one case, as to effect a cure; although the use of mephitic air has been accompanied with proper internal medicines. but dr. withering, the gentleman referred to above, informs me, that he has been more successful. one phthisical patient under his care has by a similar course intirely recovered; another was rendered much better; and a third, whose case was truly deplorable, seemed to be kept alive by it more than two months. it may be proper to observe that fixed air can only be employed with any prospect of success, in the latter stages of the _phthisis pulmonalis_, when a purulent expectoration takes place. after the rupture and discharge of a vomica also, such a remedy promises to be a powerful palliative. antiseptic fumigations and vapours have been long employed, and much extolled in cases of this kind. i made the following experiment, to determine whether their efficacy, in any degree, depends on the separation of fixed air from their substance. one end of a bent tube was fixed in a phial full of lime-water; the other end in a bottle of the tincture of myrrh. the junctures were carefully luted, and the phial containing the tincture of myrrh was placed in water, heated almost to the boiling point, by the lamp of a tea-kettle. a number of air-bubbles were separated, but probably not of the mephitic kind, for no precipitation ensued in the lime water. this experiment was repeated with the _tinct. tolutanæ, ph. ed._ and with _sp, vinos. camp._ and the result was entirely the same. the medicinal action therefore of the vapours raised from such tinctures, cannot be ascribed to the extrication of fixed air; of which it is probable bodies are deprived by _chemical solution_ as well as by _mixture_. if mephitic air be thus capable of correcting purulent matter in the lungs, we may reasonably infer it will be equally useful when applied externally to foul ulcers. and experience confirms the conclusion. even the sanies of a cancer, when the carrot poultice failed, has been sweetened by it, the pain mitigated, and a better digestion produced. the cases i refer to are now in the manchester infirmary, under the direction of my friend mr. white, whose skill as a surgeon, and abilities as a writer are well known to the public. two months have elapsed since these observations were written,[ ] and the same remedy, during that period, has been assiduously applied, but without any further success. the progress of the cancers seems to be checked by the fixed air; but it is to be feared that a cure will not be effected. a palliative remedy, however, in a disease so desperate and loathsome, may be considered as a very valuable acquisition. perhaps nitrous air might be still more efficacious. this species of factitious air is obtained from all the metals except zinc, by means of the nitrous acid; and dr. priestley informs me, that as a sweetener and antiseptic it far surpasses fixed air. he put two mice into a quantity of it, one just killed, the other offensively putrid. after twenty-five days they were both perfectly sweet. in the ulcerous sore throat much advantage has been experienced from the vapours of effervescing mixtures drawn into the _fauces_[ ]. but this remedy should not supersede the use of other antiseptic applications.[ ] a physician[ ] who had a very painful apthous ulcer at the point of his tongue, found great relief, when other remedies failed, from the application of fixed air to the part affected. he held his tongue over an effervescing mixture of potash and vinegar; and as the pain was always mitigated, and generally removed by this vaporisation, he repeated it, whenever the anguish arising from the ulcer was more than usually severe. he tried a combination of potash and oil of vitriol well diluted with water; but this proved stimulant and increased his pain; probably owing to some particles of the acid thrown upon the tongue, by the violence of the effervescence. for a paper stained with the purple juice of radishes, when held at an equal distance over two vessels, the one containing potash and vinegar, the other the same alkali and _spiritus vitrioli tenuis_, was unchanged by the former, but was spotted with red, in various parts, by the latter. in malignant fevers wines abounding with fixed air may be administered, to check the septic ferment, and sweeten the putrid _colluvies_ in the _primæ viæ_. if the laxative quality of such liquors be thought an objection to the use of them, wines of a greater age may be given, impregnated with mephitic air, by a simple but ingenious contrivance of my friend dr. priestley.[ ] the patient's common drink might also be medicated in the same way. a putrid diarrh[oe]a frequently occurs in the latter stage of such disorder, and it is a most alarming and dangerous symptom. if the discharge be stopped by astringents, a putrid _fomes_ is retained in the body, which aggravates the delirium and increases the fever. on the contrary, if it be suffered to take its course, the strength of the patient must soon be exhausted, and death unavoidably ensue. the injection of mephitic air into the intestines, under these circumstances, bids fair to be highly serviceable. and a case of this deplorable kind, has lately been communicated to me, in which the vapour of chalk and oil of vitriol conveyed into the body by the machine employed for tobacco clysters, quickly restrained the _diarrhoea_, corrected the heat and foetor of the stools, and in two days removed every symptom of danger[ ]. two similar instances of the salutary effects of mephitic air, thus administered, have occurred also in my own practice, the history of which i shall briefly lay before the reader. may we not presume that the same remedy would be equally useful in the dysentery? the experiment is at least worthy of trial. mr. w----, aged forty-four years, corpulent, inactive, with a short neck, and addicted to habits of intemperance, was attacked on the th of july , with symptoms which seemed to threaten an apoplexy. on the th, a bilious looseness succeeded, with a profuse hoemorrhage from the nose. on the th, i was called to his assistance. his countenance was bloated, his eyes heavy, his skin hot, and his pulse hard, full, and oppressed. the diarrhoea continued; his stools were bilious and very offensive; and he complained of griping pains in his bowels. he had lost, before i saw him, by the direction of mr. hall, a surgeon of eminence in manchester, eight ounces of blood from the arm, which was of a lax texture; and he had taken a saline mixture every sixth hour. the following draught was prescribed, and a dose of rhubarb directed to be administered at night. rx. _aq. cinnam. ten._ oz. j. _succ. limon. recent._ oz. ß. _salis nitri gr. xij. syr. è succo limon. dr. j. m. f. haust._ _ tis horis sumendus._ july . the _diarrhoea_ was more moderate; his griping pains were abated; and he had less stupor and dejection in his countenance. pulse , not so hard or oppressed. as his stools continued to be foetid, the dose of rhubarb was repeated; and instead of simple cinnamon-water, his draughts were prepared with an infusion of columbo root. . the _diarrhoea_ continued; his stools were involuntary; and he discharged in this way a quantity of black, grumous, and foetid blood. pulse hard and quick; skin hot; tongue covered with a dark fur; abdomen swelled; great stupor. ten grains of columbo root, and fifteen of the _gummi rubrum astringens_ were added to each draught. fixed air, under the form of clysters, was injected every second or third hour; and directions were given to supply the patient plentifully with water, artificially impregnated with mephitic air. a blister was also laid between his shoulders. . the diarrhoea continued, with frequent discharges of blood; but the stools had now lost their foetor. pulse ; great flatulence in the bowels, and fulness in the belly. the clysters of fixed air always diminished the tension of the _abdomen_, abated flatulence, and made the patient more easy and composed for some time after their injection. they were directed to be continued, together with the medicated water. the nitre was omitted, and a scruple of the _confect. damocratis_ was given every fourth hour, in an infusion of columbo root. . the diarrhoea was how checked, his other symptoms continued as before. blisters were applied to the arms; and a drachm and a half of the _tinctura serpentariæ_ was added to each draught. . his pulse was feeble, quicker and more irregular. he dosed much; talked incoherently; and laboured under a slight degree of _dyspnæa_. his urine, which had hitherto assumed no remarkable appearance, now became pale. though he discharged wind very freely, his belly was much swelled, except for a short time after the injection of the air-clysters. the following draughts were then prescribed. rx _camphoræ mucilag. g. arab, solutæ gr. viij. infus. rad. columbo oz. jfs tinct. serpent. dr. ij confect. card. scruple j syr. è cort. aurant dr. i m. f. haust. tis horis sumendus._ directions were given to foment his feet frequently with vinegar and warm water. . he has had no stools since the th. his _abdomen_ is tense. no change in the other symptoms. the _tinct. serpent._ was omitted in his draughts, and an equal quantity of _tinct. rhæi sp._ substituted in its place. in the evening he had a motion to stool, of which he was for the first time so sensible, as to give notice to his attendants. but the discharge, which was considerable and slightly offensive, consisted almost entirely of blood, both in a coagulated and in a liquid state. his medicines were therefore varied as follows: rx. _decoct. cort. peruv. oz. iss tinct. cort. ejusd. dr. ij. confect. card. scruple j gum. rubr. astring. gr. xv. pulv. alnmin. gr. vij. m. f. haustus tis horis sumendus._ red port wine was now given more freely in his medicated water; and his nourishment consisted of sago and salep. in this state, with very little variation, he continued for several days; at one time ostive, and at another discharging small quantities of fæces, mixed with grumous blood. the air-clysters were continued, and the astringents omitted. . his urine was now of an amber colour, and deposited a slight sediment. his pulse was more regular, and although still very quick, abated in number ten strokes in a minute. his head was less confused, and his sleep seemed to be refreshing. no blood appeared in his stools, which were frequent, but small in quantity; and his _abdomen_ was less tense than usual. he was extremely deaf; but gave rational answers to the few questions which were proposed to him; and said he felt no pain. . he passed a very restless night; his delirium recurred; his pulse beat strokes in a minute; his urine was of a deep amber colour when first voided; but when cold assumed the appearance of cow's whey. the _abdomen_ was not very tense, nor had he any further discharge of blood. directions were given to shave his head, and to wash it with a mixture of vinegar and brandy; the quantity of wine in his drink was diminished; and the frequent use of the pediluvium was enjoined. the air-clysters were discontinued, as his stools were not offensive, and his _abdomen_ less distended. . his pulse was now small, irregular, and beat strokes in a minute. the _dyspnoea_ was greatly increased; his skin was hot, and bedewed with a clammy moisture; and every symptom seemed to indicate the approach of death. in this state he continued till evening, when he recruited a little. the next day he had several slight convulsions. his urine which was voided plentifully, still put on the appearance of whey when cold. cordial and antispasmodic draughts, composed of camphor, tincture of castor, and _sp. vol. aromat._ were now directed; and wine was liberally administered. . he rose from his bed, and by the assistance of his attendants walked across the chamber. soon after he was seized with a violent convulsion, in which he expired. to adduce a case which terminated fatally as a proof of the efficacy of any medicine, recommended to the attention of the public, may perhaps appear singular; but cannot be deemed absurd, when that remedy answered the purposes for which it was intended. for in the instance before us; fixed air was employed, not with an expectation that it would cure the fever, but to obviate the symptoms of putrefaction, and to allay the uneasy irritation in the bowels. the disease was too malignant, the nervous system too violently affected, and the strength of the patient too much exhausted by the discharges of blood which he suffered, to afford hopes of recovery from the use of the most powerful antiseptics. but in the succeeding case the event proved more fortunate. elizabeth grundy, aged seventeen, was attacked on the th of december , with the usual symptoms of a continued fever. the common method of cure was pursued; but the disease increased, and soon assumed a putrid type. on the d i found her in a constant delirium, with a _subsultus tendinum_. her skin was hot and dry, her tongue black, her thirst immoderate, and her stools frequent, extremely offensive, and for the most part involuntary. her pulse beat strokes in a minute; she dosed much; and was very deaf. i directed wine to be administered freely; a blister to be applied to her back; the _pediluvium_ to be used several times in the day; and mephitic air to be injected under the form of a clyster every two hours. the next day her stools were less frequent, had lost their foetor, and were no longer discharged involuntarily; her pulse was reduced to strokes in the minute; and her delirium was much abated. directions were given to repeat the clysters, and to supply the patient liberally with wine. these means were assiduously pursued several days; and the young woman was so recruited by the th, that the injections were discontinued. she was now quite rational, and not averse to medicine. a decoction of peruvian bark was therefore prescribed, by the use of which she speedily recovered her health. i might add a third history of a putrid disease, in which the mephitic air is now under trial, and which affords the strongest proof both of the _antiseptic_, and of the _tonic_ powers of this remedy; but as the issue of the case remains yet undetermined (though it is highly probable, alas! that it will be fatal) i shall relate only a few particulars of it. master d. a boy of about twelve years of age, endowed with an uncommon capacity, and with the most amiable dispositions, has laboured many months under a hectic fever, the consequence of several tumours in different parts of his body. two of these tumours were laid open by mr. white, and a large quantity of purulent matter was discharged from them. the wounds were very properly treated by this skilful surgeon, and every suitable remedy, which my best judgment could suggest, was assiduously administered. but the matter became sanious, of a brown colour, and highly putrid. a _diarrhoea_ succeeded; the patient's stools were intolerably offensive, and voided without his knowledge. a black fur collected about his teeth; his tongue was covered with _aphthæ_; and his breath was so foetid, as scarcely to be endured. his strength was almost exhausted; a _subsultus tendinum_ came on; and the final period of his sufferings seemed to be rapidly approaching. as a last, but almost hopeless, effort, i advised the injection of clysters of mephitic air. these soon corrected the foetor of the patient's stools; restrained his _diarrhoea_; and seemed to recruit his strength and spirits. within the space of twenty-four hours his wounds assumed a more favourable appearance; the matter discharged from them became of a better colour and consistence; and was no longer so offensive to the smell. the use of this remedy has been continued several days, but is now laid aside. a large tumour is suddenly formed under the right ear; swallowing is rendered difficult and painful; and the patient refuses all food and medicine. nourishing clysters are directed; but it is to be feared that these will renew the looseness, and that this amiable youth will quickly sink under his disorder[ ]. the use of _wort_ from its saccharine quality, and disposition to ferment, has lately been proposed as a remedy for the sea scurvy. water or other liquors, already abounding with fixed air in a separate state, should seem to be better adapted to this purpose; as they will more quickly correct the putrid disposition of the fluids, and at the same time, by their gentle stimulus[ ] increase the powers of digestion, and give new strength to the whole system. dr. priestley, who suggested both the idea and the means of executing it, has under the sanction of the college of physicians, proposed the scheme to the lords of the admiralty, who have ordered trial to be made of it, on board some of his majesty's ships of war. might it not however give additional efficacy to this remedy, if instead of simple water, the infusion of malt were to be employed? i am persuaded such a medicinal drink might be prescribed also with great advantage in scrophulous complaints, when not attended with a hectic fever; and in other disorders in which a general acrimony prevails, and the crasis of the blood is destroyed. under such circumstances, i have seen _vibices_ which spread over the body, disappear in a few days from the use of wort. a gentleman who is subject to a scorbutic eruption in his face, for which he has used a variety of remedies with no very beneficial effect, has lately applied the fumes of chalk and oil of vitriol to the parts affected. the operation occasions great itching and pricking in the skin, and some degree of drowsiness, but evidently abates the serous discharge, and diminishes the eruption. this patient has several symptoms which indicate a genuine scorbutic diathesis; and it is probable that fixed air, taken internally, would be an useful medicine in this case. the saline draughts of riverius are supposed to owe their antiemetic effects to the air, which is separated from the salt of wormwood during the act of effervescence. and the tonic powers of many mineral waters seem to depend on this principle. i was lately desired to visit a lady who had most severe convulsive reachings. various remedies had been administered without effect, before i saw her. she earnestly desired a draught of malt liquor, and was indulged with half a pint of burton beer in brisk effervescence. the vomitings ceased immediately, and returned no more. fermenting liquors, it is well known, abound with fixed air. to this, and to the cordial quality of the beer, the favourable effect which it produced, may justly be ascribed. but i shall exceed my design by enlarging further on this subject. what has been advanced it is hoped, will suffice to excite the attention of physicians to a remedy which is capable of being applied to so many important medicinal purposes. number iv. _extract of a letter from william falconer, m.d. of bath._ jan , , reverend sir, i once observed the same taste you mention (philosophical transactions, p. . of this volume, p. .) viz. like tar water, in some water that i impregnated with fixed air about three years ago. i did not then know to what to attribute it, but your experiment seems to clear it up. i happened to have spent all my acid for raising effervescence, and to supply its place i used a bottle of dulcified spirit of nitre, which i knew was greatly under-saturated with spirit of wine; from which, as analogous to your observation, i imagine the effect proceeded. as[ ] to the coagulation of the blood of animals by fixed air, i fear it will scarce stand the test of experiment, as i this day gave it, i think, a fair trial, in the following manner. a young healthy man, at years old, received a contusion by a fall, was instantly carried to a neighbouring surgeon, and, at my request, bled in the following manner. i inserted a glass funnel into the neck of a large clear phial about oz. x. contents, and bled him into it to about oz. viii. by these means the blood was exposed to the air as little a time as possible, as it flowed into the bottle as it came from the orifice. as soon as the quantity proposed was drawn, the bottle was carefully corked, and brought to me. it was then quite fluid, nor was there the least separation of its parts. on the surface of this i conveyed several streams of fixed air (having first placed the bottle with the blood in a bowl of water, heated as nearly to the human heat as possible) from the mixture of the vitriolic acid and lixiv. tartar, which i use preferably to other alkalines, as being (as dr. cullen observes) in the mildest state, and therefore most likely to generate most air. i shook the phial often, and threw many streams of air on the blood, as i have often practised with success for impregnating water; but could not perceive the smallest signs of coagulation, although it stood in an atmosphere of fixed air minutes or more. i then uncorked the bottles, and poured off about oz. ii to which i added about or gtts of spirit of vitriol, which coagulated it immediately. i set the remainder in a cold place and it coagulated, as near as i could judge, in the same time that blood would have done newly drawn from the vein. p. . perhaps the circumilance of putrid vegetables yielding all fixed and no inflammable air may be the causes of their proving so antiseptic, even when putrid, as appears by mr. alexander's experiments. p. . perhaps the putrid air continually exhaled may be one cause of the luxuriancy of plants growing on dunghills or in very rich soils. p. . your observation that inflammable air consists of the union of some acid vapour with phlogiston, puts me in mind of an old observation of dr. cullen, that the oil separated from soap by an acid was much more inflammable than before, resembling essential oil, and soluble in v. sp. i have tried fixed air as an antiseptic taken in by respiration, but with no great success. in one case it seemed to be of service, in two it seemed indifferent, and in one was injurious, by exciting a cough. number v. _extract of a letter from mr. william bewley, of great massingham, norfolk._ march , . dear sir, when i first received your paper, i happened to have a process going on for the preparation of _nitrous ether_, without distillation.[ ] i had heretofore always taken for granted that the elastic fluid generated in that preparation was _fixed_ air: but on examination i found this combination of the nitrous acid with inflammable spirits, produced an elastic fluid that had the same general properties with the air that you unwillingly, though very properly, in my opinion, term _nitrous_; as i believe it is not to be procured without employing the _nitrous_ acid, either in a simple state, or compounded, as in _aqua regia_. i shall suggest, however, by and by some doubts with respect to it's title to the appellation of _air_. water impregnated with your nitrous air _certainly_, as you suspected from it's taste, contains the nitrous acid. on saturating a quantity of this water with a fixed alcali, and then evaporating, &c. i have procured two chrystals of nitre. but the principal observations that have occurred to me on the subject of nitrous air are the following. my experiments have been few and made by snatches, under every disadvantage as to apparatus, &c. and with frequent interruptions; and yet i think they are to be depended upon. my first remark is, that nitrous air does not give water a sensibly acid impregnation, unless it comes into contact, or is mixed with a portion of common or atmospherical air: and my second, that nitrous air principally consists of the nitrous acid itself, reduced to the state of a _permanent_ vapour not condensable by cold, like other vapours, but which requires the presence and admixture of common air to restore it to its primitive state of a liquid. i am beholden for this idea, you will perceive, to your own very curious discovery of the true nature of mr. cavendish's _marine_ vapour. when i first repeated your experiment of impregnating water with nitrous air, the water, i must own tasted acid; as it did in one, or perhaps two trials afterwards; but, to my great astonishment, in all the following experiments, though some part of the factitious air, or vapour, was visibly absorbed by the water, i could not perceive the latter to have acquired any sensible acidity. i at length found, however, that i could render this same water _very_ acid, by means only of the nitrous air already included in the phial with it. taking the inverted phial out of the water, i remove my finger from the mouth of it, to admit a little of the common air, and instantly replace my finger. the redness, effervescence, and diminution take place. again taking off my finger, and instantly replacing it, more common, air rushes in, and the same phenomena recur. the process sometimes requires to be seven or eight times repeated, before the whole of the nitrous _vapour_ (as i shall venture to call it) is condensed into nitrous _acid_, by the successive entrance of fresh parcels of common air after each effervescence; and the water becomes evidently more and more acid after every such fresh admission of the external air, which at length ceases to enter, when the whole of the vapour has been condensed. no agitation of the water is requisite, except a gentle motion, just sufficient to rince the sides of the phial, in order to wash off the condensed vapour. the acidity which you (and i likewise, at first) observed in the water agitated with nitrous air _alone_, i account for thus. on bringing the phial to the mouth, the common air meeting with the nitrous vapour in the neck of the phial, condenses it, and impregnates the water with the acid, in the very act of receiving it upon the tongue. on stopping the mouth of the phial with my tongue for a short time and afterwards withdrawing it a very little, to suffer the common air to rush past it into the phial, the sensation of acidity has been sometimes intolerable: but taking a large gulph of the water at the same time, it has been found very slightly acid.--the following is one of the methods by which i have given water a very strong acid impregnation, by means of a mixture of nitrous and common air. into a small phial, containing only common air, i force a quantity of nitrous air at random, out of a bladder, and instantly clap my finger on the mouth of the bottle. i then immerse the neck of it into water, a small quantity of which i suffer to enter, which squirts into it with violence; and immediately replacing my finger, remove the phial. the water contained in it is already _very_ acid, and it becomes more and more so (if a sufficient quantity of nitrous air was at first thrown in) on alternately stopping the mouth of the phial, and opening it, as often as fresh air will enter. since i wrote the above, i have frequently converted a small portion of water in an ounce phial into a weak _aqua fortis_, by repeated mixtures of common and nitrous air; throwing in alternately the one or the other, according to the circumstances; that is, as long as there was a superabundance of nitrous air, suffering the common air to enter and condense it; and, when that was effected, forcing in more nitrous air from the bladder, to the common air which now predominated in the phial--and so alternately. i have wanted leisure, and conveniences, to carry on this process to its _maximum_, or to execute it in a different and better manner; but from what i have done, i think we may conclude that nitrous air consists principally of the nitrous acid, phlogisticated, or otherwise so modified, by a previous commenstruation with metals, inflammable spirits, &c. as to be reduced into a durably elastic vapour: and that, in order to deprive it of its elasticity, and restore it to its former state, an addition of common air is requisite, and, as i suspect, of water likewise, or some other fluid: as in the course of my few trials, i have not yet been able to condense it in a perfectly dry bottle. number vi. _a letter from_ dr. franklin. craven street, april , . dear sir, in compliance with your request, i have endeavoured to recollect the circumstances of the american experiments i formerly mentioned to you, of raising a flame on the surface of some waters there. when i passed through new jersey in , i heard it several times mentioned, that by applying a lighted candle near the surface of some of their rivers, a sudden flame would catch and spread on the water, continuing to burn for near half a minute. but the accounts i received were so imperfect that i could form no guess at the cause of such an effect, and rather doubted the truth of it. i had no opportunity of seeing the experiment; but calling to see a friend who happened to be just returned home from making it himself, i learned from him the manner of it; which was to choose a shallow place, where the bottom could be reached by a walking-stick, and was muddy; the mud was first to be stirred with the stick, and when a number of small bubbles began to arise from it, the candle was applied. the flame was so sudden and so strong, that it catched his ruffle and spoiled it, as i saw. new-jersey having many pine-trees in different parts of it, i then imagined that something like a volatile oil of turpentine might be mixed with the waters from a pine-swamp, but this supposition did not quite satisfy me. i mentioned the fact to some philosophical friends on my return to england, but it was not much attended to. i suppose i was thought a little too credulous. in , the reverend dr. chandler received a letter from dr. finley, president of the college in that province, relating the same experiment. it was read at the royal society, nov. , of that year, but not printed in the transactions; perhaps because it was thought too strange to be true, and some ridicule might be apprehended if any member should attempt to repeat it in order to ascertain or refute it. the following is a copy of that account. "a worthy gentleman, who lives at a few miles distance, informed me that in a certain small cove of a mill-pond, near his house, he was surprized to see the surface of the water blaze like inflamed spirits. i soon after went to the place, and made the experiment with the same success. the bottom of the creek was muddy, and when stirred up, so as to cause a considerable curl on the surface, and a lighted candle held within two or three inches of it, the whole surface was in a blaze, as instantly as the vapour of warm inflammable spirits, and continued, when strongly agitated, for the space of several seconds. it was at first imagined to be peculiar to that place; but upon trial it was soon found, that such a bottom in other places exhibited the same phenomenon. the discovery was accidentally made by one belonging to the mill." i have tried the experiment twice here in england, but without success. the first was in a slow running water with a muddy bottom. the second in a stagnant water at the bottom of a deep ditch. being some time employed in stirring this water, i ascribed an intermitting fever, which seized me a few days after, to my breathing too much of that foul air which i stirred up from the bottom, and which i could not avoid while i stooped in endeavouring to kindle it.--the discoveries you have lately made of the manner in which inflammable air is in some cases produced, may throw light on this experiment, and explain its succeeding in some cases, and not in others. with the highest esteem and respect, i am, dear sir, your most obedient humble servant, b. franklin. number vii. _extract of a letter from_ mr. henry _of_ manchester. it is with great pleasure i hear of your intended publication _on air_, and i beg leave to communicate to you an experiment or two which i lately made. dr. percival had tried, without effect, to dissolve lead in water impregnated with fixed air. i however thought it probable, that the experiment might succeed with nitrous air. into a quantity of water impregnated with it, i put several pieces of sheet-lead, and suffered them, after agitation, to continue immersed about two hours. a few drops of vol. tincture of sulphur changed the water to a deep orange colour, but not so deep as when the same tincture was added to a glass of the same water, into which one drop of a solution of sugar of lead had been instilled. the precipitates of both in the morning, were exactly of the same kind; and the water in which the lead had been infused all night, being again tried by the same test, gave signs of a still stronger saturnine impregnation--whether the nitrous air acts as an acid on the lead, or in the same manner that fixed air dissolves iron, i do not pretend to determine. syrup of violets added to the nitrous water became of a pale red, but on standing about an hour, grew of a turbid brown cast. though the nitrous acid is not often found, except produced by art, yet as there is a probability that nitre may be formed in the earth in large towns, and indeed fossile nitre has been actually found in such situations, it should be an additional caution against the use of leaden pumps. i tried to dissolve mercury by the same means, but without success. i am, with the most sincere esteem, dear sir, your obliged and obedient servant, tho. henry. _finis._ footnotes: [ ] see dr. falconer's very useful and ingenious treatise on the bath water, d edit. p. . [ ] may, . [ ] vid. mr. white's useful treatise on the management of pregnant and lying-in women, p. . [ ] see the author's observations on the efficacy of external applications in the ulcerous sore throats, essays medical and experimental, vol. i. d edit. p. . [ ] the author of these observations. [ ] directions for impregnating water with fixed air, in order to communicate to it the peculiar spirit and virtues of pyrmont water, and other mineral waters of a similar nature. [ ] referring to the case communicated by mr. hey. [ ] he languished about a week, and then died. [ ] the vegetables which are most efficacious in the cure of the scurvy, possess some degree of a stimulating power. [ ] this refers, to an experiment mentioned in the first publication of these papers in the philosophical transactions, but omitted in this volume. [ ] the first account of this curious process was, i believe, given in the mem. de l'ac. de sc. de paris for . though seemingly less volatile than the vitriolic ether, it boils with a much smaller degree of heat. one day last summer, it boiled in the coolest room of my house; as it gave me notice by the explosion attending its driving out the cork. to save the bottle, and to prevent the total loss of the liquor by evaporation, i found myself obliged instantly to carry it down to my cellar. errata. p. . l. . _for_ it to _read_ to it p. . l. . ---- has ---- had p. . l. . ---- inflammable ---- in inflammable p. . l. . ---- experiments ---- experiment p. . l. . ---- with ---- of p. . l. . ---- that is ---- this air p. . l. . ---- ingenious ---- ingenuous p. . l. . ---- of ---- , if p. . l. . ---- diminishing ---- diminished p. . l. . ---- seem ---- seems p. . l. . ---- ---- ---- one end p. . l. . ---- ---- ---- the nitrous p. . l. . ---- deslrium ---- delirium p. . l. . ---- recet. ---- recent. p. . l. . ---- per ---- peruv. p. . l. . ---- usual ---- useful p. . to . passim ---- diarrhæa ---- diarrhoea p. . l. . ---- remains ---- remainder p. . l. . ---- it ---- iron. a catalogue of books written by joseph priestley, ll.d. f.r.s., _and printed for_ j. johnson, bookseller, at no. , st. paul's church-yard, london. . the history and present state of electricity, with original experiments, illustrated with copper plates. th edit, corrected and enlarged, to. l. s. . a familiar introduction to the study of electricity, d edit. vo. s. d. . the history and present state of discoveries relating to vision, light, and colours, vols. to. illustrated with a great number of copper plates, l. s. d. in boards. . a familiar introduction to the theory and practice of perspective, with copper plates, s. in boards. . directions for impregnating water with fixed air, in order to communicate to it the peculiar spirit and virtues of pyrmont water, and other mineral waters of a similar nature, s. . experiments and observations on different kinds of air, with copper plates, d edit. s. in boards. . a new chart of history, containing a view of the principal revolutions of empire that have taken place in the world; with a book describing it, containing an epitome of universal history, s. d. . a chart of biography, with a book, containing an explanation of it, and a catalogue of all the names inserted in it, th edit, very much improved, s. d. . an essay on a course of liberal education for civil and active life; with plans of lectures on, . the study of history and general policy. . the history of england. . the constitution and laws of england. to which are added remarks on dr. browne's proposed code of education. . the rudiments of english grammar, adapted to the use of schools, s. d. . the above grammar, with notes and observations, for the use of those who have made some proficiency in the language, th ed. s. . an essay on the first principles of government, and on the nature of political, civil, and religious liberty, d edit, much enlarged, s. . institutes of natural and revealed religion, vol. i. containing the elements of natural religion; to which is prefixed, an essay on the best method of communicating religious knowledge to the members of christian societies, s. d. sewed.--vol. ii. containing the evidences of the jewish and christian revelation, s. sewed.--vol. iii. containing the doctrines of revelation, s. d. sewed.--preparing for the press (march ) the fourth and last part of this work, containing a view of the corruptions of christianity. . an examination of dr. reid's enquiry into the human mind, on the principles of common sense, dr. beattie's essay on the nature and immutability of truth, and dr. oswald's appeal to common sense in behalf of religion. to which is added the correspondence of dr. beattie and dr. oswald with the author, d edit. s. unbound. . a free address to protestant dissenters, on the subject of the lord's supper, the third edition with additions, s. . the additions to the above may be had alone, s. . an address to protestant dissenters, on the subject of giving the lord's supper to children, s. . considerations on differences of opinion among christians; with a letter to the rev. mr. venn, in answer to his examination of the address to protestant dissenters, s. d. . a catechism for children and young persons, d edit. d. . a scripture catechism, consisting of a series of questions, with references to the scriptures instead of answers, d. . a serious address to masters of families, with forms of family prayer, d edit. d. . a view of the principles and conduct of the protestant dissenters, with respect to the civil and ecclesiastical constitution of england, d edit. s. d. . a free address to protestant dissenters, on the subject of church discipline; with a preliminary discourse concerning the spirit of christianity, and the corruption of it by false notions of religion, s. d. . a sermon preached before the congregation of protestant dissenters, at mill hill chapel, in leeds, may , , on occasion of his resigning the pastoral office among them, s. . a free address to protestant dissenters, as such. by a dissenter. a new edition, enlarged and corrected, s. d.--an allowance is made to those who buy this pamphlet to give away. . letters to the author of _remarks on several late publications relative to the dissenters, in a letter to dr. priestley_, s. . an appeal to the serious and candid professors of christianity on the following subjects, viz. . the use of reason in matters of religion. . the power of man to do the will of god. . original sin. . election and reprobation. . the divinity of christ. and, . atonement for sin by the death of christ, th edit. d. . a familiar illustration of certain passages of scripture relating to the same subject. d. or s. d. per dozen. . the triumph of truth; being an account of the trial of mr. e. elwall, for heresy and blasphemy, at stafford assizes, before judge denton, &c. d edit. d. . considerations for the use of young men, and the parents of young men, d. _also, published under the direction of dr. priestley_, the theological repository. consisting of original essays, hints, queries, &c. calculated to promote religious knowledge, in volumes, vo, price s. in boards. among other articles, too many to be enumerated in an advertisement, these three volumes will be found to contain such original and truly valuable observations on the doctrine of the _atonement_, the _pre-existence of christ_, and the _inspiration of the scriptures_, more especially respecting the _harmony of the evangelists_, and the reasoning of the apostle paul, as cannot fail to recommend them to those persons, who wish to make a truly free enquiry into these important subjects. in the first volume, which is now reprinted, several articles are added, particularly two letters from dr. thomas shaw to dr. benson, relating to the passage of the israelites through the red sea. [illustration: _to face the last page._] note: project gutenberg also has an html version of this file which includes the original illustrations. see -h.htm or -h.zip: (http://www.gutenberg.net/dirs/ / / / / / -h/ -h.htm) or (http://www.gutenberg.net/dirs/ / / / / / -h.zip) the story of alchemy and the beginnings of chemistry by m. m. pattison muir, m.a. fellow and formerly prælector in chemistry of gonville and caius college, cambridge with eighteen illustrations new and enlarged edition hodder and stoughton london, new york, toronto [illustration: an alchemical laboratory] "it is neither religious nor wise to judge that of which you know nothing." _a brief guide to the celestial ruby_, by philalethes ( th century) * * * * * the useful knowledge series cloth, one shilling net each list of the first thirty-four volumes issued in the new style with pictorial wrappers:-- wireless telegraphy. by alfred t. story. a piece of coal. by k.a. martin, f.g.s. architecture. by p.l. waterhouse. the cotton plant. by f. wilkinson, f.g.s. plant life. by grant allen. wild flowers. by rev. prof. g. henslow, f.l.s., f.g.s. the solar system. by g.f. chambers, f.r.a.s. eclipses. by g.f. chambers, f.r.a.s. the stars. by g.f.chambers, f.r.a.s. the weather. by g.f. chambers, f.r.a.s. animal life. by b. lindsay. geographical discovery. by joseph jacobs. the atmosphere. by douglas archibald, m.a. alpine climbing. by francis gribble forest and stream. by james rodway, f.l.s. fish life. by w.p. pycraft, f.z.s. bird life. by w.p. pycraft, f.z.s. primitive man. by edward clodd. ancient egypt. by robinson souttar, m.a., d.c.l. story of locomotion. by beckles willson. the earth in past ages. by h.g. seeley, f.r.s. the empire. by e. salmon. king alfred. by sir walter besant. lost england. by beckles willson. alchemy, or the beginnings of chemistry. by m.m. pattison muir, m.a. the chemical elements. by m.m. pattison muir, m.a. the wanderings of atoms. by m.m. pattison muir, m.a. germ life: bacteria. by h.w. conn. life in the seas. by sidney j. hickson f.r.s. life's mechanism. by h.w. conn. reptile life. by w.p. pycraft, f.z.s. the grain of wheat. by william c. edgar. the potter. by c.f. binns. * * * * * preface. the story of alchemy and the beginnings of chemistry is very interesting in itself. it is also a pregnant example of the contrast between the scientific and the emotional methods of regarding nature; and it admirably illustrates the differences between well-grounded, suggestive, hypotheses, and baseless speculations. i have tried to tell the story so that it may be intelligible to the ordinary reader. m.m. pattison muir. cambridge, november . * * * * * note to new edition. a few small changes have been made. the last chapter has been re-written and considerably enlarged. m.m.p.m. farnham, september . * * * * * contents. chapter i. the explanation of material changes given by greek thinkers ii. a sketch of alchemical theory iii. the alchemical notion of the unity and simplicity of nature iv. the alchemical elements and principles v. the alchemical essence vi. alchemy as an experimental art vii. the language of alchemy viii. the degeneracy of alchemy ix. paracelsus, and some other alchemists x. summary of the alchemical doctrine--the replacement of the three principles of the alchemists by the single principle of phlogiston xi. the examination of the phenomena of combustion xii. the recognition of chemical changes as the interactions of definite substances xiii. the chemical elements contrasted with the alchemical principles xiv. the modern form of the alchemical quest of the one thing index list of illustrations fig. an alchemical laboratory (frontispiece) . the mortification of metals presented by the image of a king devouring his son and . the mortification of metals presented by images of death and burial and . two must be conjoined to produce one . hermetically sealing the neck of a glass vessel . sealing by means of a mercury trap . an alchemical common cold still . a _balneum mariÆ_ . alchemical distilling apparatus . a pelican . an alchemist with a retort . an alchemist preparing oil of vitriol . alchemical apparatus for rectifying spirits . purifying gold presented by the image of a salamander in the fire . priestley's apparatus for working with gases . apparatus used by lavoisier in his experiments on burning mercury in air chapter i the explanation of material changes given by the greek thinkers. for thousands of years before men had any accurate and exact knowledge of the changes of material things, they had thought about these changes, regarded them as revelations of spiritual truths, built on them theories of things in heaven and earth (and a good many things in neither), and used them in manufactures, arts, and handicrafts, especially in one very curious manufacture wherein not the thousandth fragment of a grain of the finished article was ever produced. the accurate and systematic study of the changes which material things undergo is called chemistry; we may, perhaps, describe alchemy as the superficial, and what may be called subjective, examination of these changes, and the speculative systems, and imaginary arts and manufactures, founded on that examination. we are assured by many old writers that adam was the first alchemist, and we are told by one of the initiated that adam was created on the sixth day, being the th of march, of the first year of the world; certainly alchemy had a long life, for chemistry did not begin until about the middle of the th century. no branch of science has had so long a period of incubation as chemistry. there must be some extraordinary difficulty in the way of disentangling the steps of those changes wherein substances of one kind are produced from substances totally unlike them. to inquire how those of acute intellects and much learning regarded such occurrences in the times when man's outlook on the world was very different from what it is now, ought to be interesting, and the results of that inquiry must surely be instructive. if the reader turns to a modern book on chemistry (for instance, _the story of the chemical elements_, in this series), he will find, at first, superficial descriptions of special instances of those occurrences which are the subject of the chemist's study; he will learn that only certain parts of such events are dealt with in chemistry; more accurate descriptions will then be given of changes which occur in nature, or can be produced by altering the ordinary conditions, and the reader will be taught to see certain points of likeness between these changes; he will be shown how to disentangle chemical occurrences, to find their similarities and differences; and, gradually, he will feel his way to general statements, which are more or less rigorous and accurate expressions of what holds good in a large number of chemical processes; finally, he will discover that some generalisations have been made which are exact and completely accurate descriptions applicable to every case of chemical change. but if we turn to the writings of the alchemists, we are in a different world. there is nothing even remotely resembling what one finds in a modern book on chemistry. here are a few quotations from alchemical writings [ ]: [ ] most of the quotations from alchemical writings, in this book, are taken from a series of translations, published in - , under the supervision of mr a.e. waite. "it is necessary to deprive matter of its qualities in order to draw out its soul.... copper is like a man; it has a soul and a body ... the soul is the most subtile part ... that is to say, the tinctorial spirit. the body is the ponderable, material, terrestrial thing, endowed with a shadow.... after a series of suitable treatments copper becomes without shadow and better than gold.... the elements grow and are transmuted, because it is their qualities, not their substances which are contrary." (stephanus of alexandria, about a.d.) "if we would elicit our medecine from the precious metals, we must destroy the particular metalic form, without impairing its specific properties. the specific properties of the metal have their abode in its spiritual part, which resides in homogeneous water. thus we must destroy the particular form of gold, and change it into its generic homogeneous water, in which the spirit of gold is preserved; this spirit afterwards restores the consistency of its water, and brings forth a new form (after the necessary putrefaction) a thousand times more perfect than the form of gold which it lost by being reincrudated." (philalethes, th century.) "the bodily nature of things is a concealing outward vesture." (michael sendivogius, th century.) "nothing of true value is located in the body of a substance, but in the virtue ... the less there is of body, the more in proportion is the virtue." (paracelsus, th century.) "there are four elements, and each has at its centre another element which makes it what it is. these are the four pillars of the world.... it is their contrary action which keeps up the harmony and equilibrium of the mundane machinery." (michael sendivogius.) "nature cannot work till it has been supplied with a material: the first matter is furnished by god, the second matter by the sage." (michael sendivogius.) "when corruptible elements are united in a certain substance, their strife must sooner or later bring about its decomposition, which is, of course, followed by putrefaction; in putrefaction, the impure is separated from the pure; and if the pure elements are then once more joined together by the action of natural heat, a much nobler and higher form of life is produced.... if the hidden central fire, which during life was in a state of passivity, obtain the mastery, it attracts to itself all the pure elements, which are thus separated from the impure, and form the nucleus of a far purer form of life." (michael sendivogius.) "cause that which is above to be below; that which is visible to be invisible; that which is palpable to become impalpable. again let that which is below become that which is above; let the invisible become visible, and the impalpable become palpable. here you see the perfection of our art, without any defect or diminution." (basil valentine, th century.) "think most diligently about this; often bear in mind, observe and comprehend, that all minerals and metals together, in the same time, and after the same fashion, and of one and the same principal matter, are produced and generated. that matter is no other than a mere vapour, which is extracted from the elementary earth by the superior stars, or by a sidereal distillation of the macrocosm; which sidereal hot infusion, with an airy sulphurous property, descending upon inferiors, so acts and operates as that there is implanted, spiritually and invisibly, a certain power and virtue in those metals and minerals; which fume, moreover, resolves in the earth into a certain water, wherefrom all metals are thenceforth generated and ripened to their perfection, and thence proceeds this or that metal or mineral, according as one of the three principles acquires dominion, and they have much or little of sulphur and salt, or an unequal mixture of these; whence some metals are fixed--that is, constant or stable; and some are volatile and easily changeable, as is seen in gold, silver, copper, iron, tin, and lead." (basil valentine.) "to grasp the invisible elements, to attract them by their material correspondences, to control, purify, and transform them by the living power of the spirit--this is true alchemy." (paracelsus.) "destruction perfects that which is good; for the good cannot appear on account of that which conceals it.... each one of the visible metals is a concealment of the other six metals." (paracelsus.) these sayings read like sentences in a forgotten tongue. humboldt tells of a parrot which had lived with a tribe of american indians, and learnt scraps of their language; the tribe totally disappeared; the parrot alone remained, and babbled words in the language which no living human being could understand. are the words i have quoted unintelligible, like the parrot's prating? perhaps the language may be reconstructed; perhaps it may be found to embody something worth a hearing. success is most likely to come by considering the growth of alchemy; by trying to find the ideas which were expressed in the strange tongue; by endeavouring to look at our surroundings as the alchemists looked at theirs. do what we will, we always, more or less, construct our own universe. the history of science may be described as the history of the attempts, and the failures, of men "to see things as they are." "nothing is harder," said the latin poet lucretius, "than to separate manifest facts from doubtful, what straightway the mind adds on of itself." observations of the changes which are constantly happening in the sky, and on the earth, must have prompted men long ago to ask whether there are any limits to the changes of things around them. and this question must have become more urgent as working in metals, making colours and dyes, preparing new kinds of food and drink, producing substances with smells and tastes unlike those of familiar objects, and other pursuits like these, made men acquainted with transformations which seemed to penetrate to the very foundations of things. can one thing be changed into any other thing; or, are there classes of things within each of which change is possible, while the passage from one class to another is not possible? are all the varied substances seen, tasted, handled, smelt, composed of a limited number of essentially different things; or, is each fundamentally different from every other substance? such questions as these must have pressed for answers long ago. some of the greek philosophers who lived four or five hundred years before christ formed a theory of the transformations of matter, which is essentially the theory held by naturalists to-day. these philosophers taught that to understand nature we must get beneath the superficial qualities of things. "according to convention," said democritus (born b.c.), "there are a sweet and a bitter, a hot and a cold, and according to convention there is colour. in truth there are atoms and a void." those investigators attempted to connect all the differences which are observed between the qualities of things with differences of size, shape, position, and movement of atoms. they said that all things are formed by the coalescence of certain unchangeable, indestructible, and impenetrable particles which they named atoms; the total number of atoms is constant; not one of them can be destroyed, nor can one be created; when a substance ceases to exist and another is formed, the process is not a destruction of matter, it is a re-arrangement of atoms. only fragments of the writings of the founders of the atomic theory have come to us. the views of these philosophers are preserved, and doubtless amplified and modified, in a latin poem, _concerning the nature of things_, written by lucretius, who was born a century before the beginning of our era. let us consider the picture given in that poem of the material universe, and the method whereby the picture was produced.[ ] [ ] the quotations from lucretius are taken from munro's translation ( th edition, ). all knowledge, said lucretius, is based on "the aspect and the law of nature." true knowledge can be obtained only by the use of the senses; there is no other method. "from the senses first has proceeded the knowledge of the true, and the senses cannot be refuted. shall reason, founded on false sense, be able to contradict [the senses], wholly founded as it is on the senses? and if they are not true, then all reason as well is rendered false." the first principle in nature is asserted by lucretius to be that "nothing is ever gotten out of nothing." "a thing never returns to nothing, but all things after disruption go back to the first bodies of matter." if there were not imperishable seeds of things, atoms, "first-beginnings of solid singleness," then, lucretius urges, "infinite time gone by and lapse of days must have eaten up all things that are of mortal body." the first-beginnings, or atoms, of things were thought of by lucretius as always moving; "there is no lowest point in the sum of the universe" where they can rest; they meet, clash, rebound, or sometimes join together into groups of atoms which move about as wholes. change, growth, decay, formation, disruption--these are the marks of all things. "the war of first-beginnings waged from eternity is carried on with dubious issue: now here, now there, the life-bringing elements of things get the mastery, and are o'ermastered in turn; with the funeral wail blends the cry which babies raise when they enter the borders of light; and no night ever followed day, nor morning night, that heard not, mingling with the sickly infant's cries, the attendants' wailings on death and black funeral." lucretius pictured the atoms of things as like the things perceived by the senses; he said that atoms of different kinds have different shapes, but the number of shapes is finite, because there is a limit to the number of different things we see, smell, taste, and handle; he implies, although i do not think he definitely asserts, that all atoms of one kind are identical in every respect. we now know that many compounds exist which are formed by the union of the same quantities by weight of the same elements, and, nevertheless, differ in properties; modern chemistry explains this fact by saying that the properties of a substance depend, not only on the kind of atoms which compose the minute particles of a compound, and the number of atoms of each kind, but also on the mode of arrangement of the atoms.[ ] the same doctrine was taught by lucretius, two thousand years ago. "it often makes a great difference," he said, "with what things, and in what positions the same first-beginnings are held in union, and what motions they mutually impart and receive." for instance, certain atoms may be so arranged at one time as to produce fire, and, at another time, the arrangement of the same atoms may be such that the result is a fir-tree. the differences between the colours of things are said by lucretius to be due to differences in the arrangements and motions of atoms. as the colour of the sea when wind lashes it into foam is different from the colour when the waters are at rest, so do the colours of things change when the atoms whereof the things are composed change from one arrangement to another, or from sluggish movements to rapid and tumultuous motions. [ ] see the chapter _molecular architecture_ in the _story of the chemical elements_. lucretius pictured a solid substance as a vast number of atoms squeezed closely together, a liquid as composed of not so many atoms less tightly packed, and a gas as a comparatively small number of atoms with considerable freedom of motion. essentially the same picture is presented by the molecular theory of to-day. to meet the objection that atoms are invisible, and therefore cannot exist, lucretius enumerates many things we cannot see although we know they exist. no one doubts the existence of winds, heat, cold and smells; yet no one has seen the wind, or heat, or cold, or a smell. clothes become moist when hung near the sea, and dry when spread in the sunshine; but no one has seen the moisture entering or leaving the clothes. a pavement trodden by many feet is worn away; but the minute particles are removed without our eyes being able to see them. another objector urges--"you say the atoms are always moving, yet the things we look at, which you assert to be vast numbers of moving atoms, are often motionless." him lucretius answers by an analogy. "and herein you need not wonder at this, that though the first-beginnings of things are all in motion, yet the sum is seen to rest in supreme repose, unless when a thing exhibits motions with its individual body. for all the nature of first things lies far away from our senses, beneath their ken; and, therefore, since they are themselves beyond what you can see, they must withdraw from sight their motion as well; and the more so, that the things which we can see do yet often conceal their motions when a great distance off. thus, often, the woolly flocks as they crop the glad pastures on a hill, creep on whither the grass, jewelled with fresh dew, summons or invites each, and the lambs, fed to the full, gambol and playfully butt; all which objects appear to us from a distance to be blended together, and to rest like a white spot on a green hill. again, when mighty legions fill with their movements all parts of the plains, waging the mimicry of war, the glitter lifts itself up to the sky, and the whole earth round gleams with brass, and beneath a noise is raised by the mighty tramplings of men, and the mountains, stricken by the shouting, echo the voices to the stars of heaven, and horsemen fly about, and suddenly wheeling, scour across the middle of the plains, shaking them with the vehemence of their charge. and yet there is some spot on the high hills, seen from which they appear to stand still and to rest on the plains as a bright spot." the atomic theory of the greek thinkers was constructed by reasoning on natural phenomena. lucretius constantly appeals to observed facts for confirmation of his theoretical teachings, or refutation of opinions he thought erroneous. besides giving a general mental presentation of the material universe, the theory was applied to many specific transmutations; but minute descriptions of what are now called chemical changes could not be given in terms of the theory, because no searching examination of so much as one such change had been made, nor, i think, one may say, could be made under the conditions of greek life. more than two thousand years passed before investigators began to make accurate measurements of the quantities of the substances which take part in those changes wherein certain things seem to be destroyed and other totally different things to be produced; until accurate knowledge had been obtained of the quantities of the definite substances which interact in the transformations of matter, the atomic theory could not do more than draw the outlines of a picture of material changes. a scientific theory has been described as "the likening of our imaginings to what we actually observe." so long as we observe only in the rough, only in a broad and general way, our imaginings must also be rough, broad, and general. it was the great glory of the greek thinkers about natural events that their observations were accurate, on the whole, and as far as they went, and the theory they formed was based on no trivial or accidental features of the facts, but on what has proved to be the very essence of the phenomena they sought to bring into one point of view; for all the advances made in our own times in clear knowledge of the transformations of matter have been made by using, as a guide to experimental inquiries, the conception that the differences between the qualities of substances are connected with differences in the weights and movements of minute particles; and this was the central idea of the atomic theory of the greek philosophers. the atomic theory was used by the great physicists of the later renaissance, by galileo, gassendi, newton and others. our own countryman, john dalton, while trying (in the early years of the th century) to form a mental presentation of the atmosphere in terms of the theory of atoms, rediscovered the possibility of differences between the sizes of atoms, applied this idea to the facts concerning the quantitative compositions of compounds which had been established by others, developed a method for determining the relative weights of atoms of different kinds, and started chemistry on the course which it has followed so successfully. instead of blaming the greek philosophers for lack of quantitatively accurate experimental inquiry, we should rather be full of admiring wonder at the extraordinary acuteness of their mental vision, and the soundness of their scientific spirit. the ancient atomists distinguished the essential properties of things from their accidental features. the former cannot be removed, lucretius said, without "utter destruction accompanying the severance"; the latter may be altered "while the nature of the thing remains unharmed." as examples of essential properties, lucretius mentions "the weight of a stone, the heat of fire, the fluidity of water." such things as liberty, war, slavery, riches, poverty, and the like, were accounted accidents. time also was said to be an accident: it "exists not by itself; but simply from the things which happen, the sense apprehends what has been done in time past, as well as what is present, and what is to follow after." as our story proceeds, we shall see that the chemists of the middle ages, the alchemists, founded their theory of material changes on the difference between a supposed essential substratum of things, and their qualities which could be taken off, they said, and put on, as clothes are removed and replaced. how different from the clear, harmonious, orderly, greek scheme, is any picture we can form, from such quotations as i have given from their writings, of the alchemists' conception of the world. the greeks likened their imaginings of nature to the natural facts they observed; the alchemists created an imaginary world after their own likeness. while christianity was superseding the old religions, and the theological system of the christian church was replacing the cosmogonies of the heathen, the contrast between the power of evil and the power of good was more fully realised than in the days of the greeks; a sharper division was drawn between this world and another world, and that other world was divided into two irreconcilable and absolutely opposite parts. man came to be regarded as the centre of a tremendous and never-ceasing battle, urged between the powers of good and the powers of evil. the sights and sounds of nature were regarded as the vestments, or the voices, of the unseen combatants. life was at once very real and the mere shadow of a dream. the conditions were favourable to the growth of magic; for man was regarded as the measure of the universe, the central figure in an awful tragedy. magic is an attempt, by thinking and speculating about what we consider must be the order of nature, to discover some means of penetrating into the secret life of natural things, of realising the hidden powers and virtues of things, grasping the concealed thread of unity which is supposed to run through all phenomena however seemingly diverse, entering into sympathy with the supposed inner oneness of life, death, the present, past, and future. magic grows, and gathers strength, when men are sure their theory of the universe must be the one true theory, and they see only through the glasses which their theory supplies. "he who knows himself thoroughly knows god and all the mysteries of his nature," says a modern writer on magic. that saying expresses the fundamental hypothesis, and the method, of all systems of magic and mysticism. of such systems, alchemy was one. chapter ii. a sketch of alchemical theory. the system which began to be called _alchemy_ in the th and th centuries of our era had no special name before that time, but was known as _the sacred art, the divine science, the occult science, the art of hermes_. a commentator on aristotle, writing in the th century a.d., calls certain instruments used for fusion and calcination "_chuika organa_," that is, instruments for melting and pouring. hence, probably, came the adjective _chyic_ or _chymic_, and, at a somewhat later time, the word _chemia_ as the name of that art which deals with calcinations, fusions, meltings, and the like. the writer of a treatise on astrology, in the th century, speaking of the influences of the stars on the dispositions of man, says: "if a man is born under mercury he will give himself to astronomy; if mars, he will follow the profession of arms; if saturn, he will devote himself to the science of alchemy (_scientia alchemiae_)." the word _alchemia_ which appears in this treatise, was formed by prefixing the arabic _al_ (meaning _the_) to _chemia_, a word, as we have seen, of greek origin. it is the growth, development, and transformation into chemistry, of this _alchemia_ which we have to consider. alchemy, that is, _the_ art of melting, pouring, and transforming, must necessarily pay much attention to working with crucibles, furnaces, alembics, and other vessels wherein things are fused, distilled, calcined, and dissolved. the old drawings of alchemical operations show us men busy calcining, cohobating, distilling, dissolving, digesting, and performing other processes of like character to these. the alchemists could not be accused of laziness or aversion to work in their laboratories. paracelsus ( th century) says of them: "they are not given to idleness, nor go in a proud habit, or plush and velvet garments, often showing their rings on their fingers, or wearing swords with silver hilts by their sides, or fine and gay gloves on their hands; but diligently follow their labours, sweating whole days and nights by their furnaces. they do not spend their time abroad for recreation, but take delight in their laboratories. they put their fingers among coals, into clay and filth, not into gold rings. they are sooty and black, like smiths and miners, and do not pride themselves upon clean and beautiful faces." in these respects the chemist of to-day faithfully follows the practice of the alchemists who were his predecessors. you can nose a chemist in a crowd by the smell of the laboratory which hangs about him; you can pick him out by the stains on his hands and clothes. he also "takes delight in his laboratory"; he does not always "pride himself on a clean and beautiful face"; he "sweats whole days and nights by his furnace." why does the chemist toil so eagerly? why did the alchemists so untiringly pursue their quest? i think it is not unfair to say: the chemist experiments in order that he "may liken his imaginings to the facts which he observes"; the alchemist toiled that he might liken the facts which he observed to his imaginings. the difference may be put in another way by saying: the chemist's object is to discover "how changes happen in combinations of the unchanging"; the alchemist's endeavour was to prove the truth of his fundamental assertion, "that every substance contains undeveloped resources and potentialities, and can be brought outward and forward into perfection." looking around him, and observing the changes of things, the alchemist was deeply impressed by the growth and modification of plants and animals; he argued that minerals and metals also grow, change, develop. he said in effect: "nature is one, there must be unity in all the diversity i see. when a grain of corn falls into the earth it dies, but this dying is the first step towards a new life; the dead seed is changed into the living plant. so it must be with all other things in nature: the mineral, or the metal, seems dead when it is buried in the earth, but, in reality, it is growing, changing, and becoming more perfect." the perfection of the seed is the plant. what is the perfection of the common metals? "evidently," the alchemist replied, "the perfect metal is gold; the common metals are trying to become gold." "gold is the intention of nature in regard to all metals," said an alchemical writer. plants are preserved by the preservation of their seed. "in like manner," the alchemist's argument proceeded, "there must be a seed in metals which is their essence; if i can separate the seed and bring it under the proper conditions, i can cause it to grow into the perfect metal." "animal life, and human life also," we may suppose the alchemist saying, "are continued by the same method as that whereby the life of plants is continued; all life springs from seed; the seed is fructified by the union of the male and the female; in metals also there must be the two characters; the union of these is needed for the production of new metals; the conjoining of metals must go before the birth of the perfect metal." "now," we may suppose the argument to proceed, "now, the passage from the imperfect to the more perfect is not easy. it is harder to practise virtue than to acquiesce in vice; virtue comes not naturally to man; that he may gain the higher life, he must be helped by grace. therefore, the task of exalting the purer metals into the perfect gold, of developing the lower order into the higher, is not easy. if nature does this, she does it slowly and painfully; if the exaltation of the common metals to a higher plane is to be effected rapidly, it can be done only by the help of man." so far as i can judge from their writings, the argument of the alchemists may be rendered by some such form as the foregoing. a careful examination of the alchemical argument shows that it rests on a (supposed) intimate knowledge of nature's plan of working, and the certainty that simplicity is the essential mark of that plan. that the alchemists were satisfied of the great simplicity of nature, and their own knowledge of the ways of nature's work, is apparent from their writings. the author of _the new chemical light_ ( th century) says: "simplicity is the seal of truth.... nature is wonderfully simple, and the characteristic mark of a childlike simplicity is stamped upon all that is true and noble in nature." in another place the same author says: "nature is one, true, simple, self-contained, created of god, and informed with a certain universal spirit." the same author, michael sendivogius, remarks: "it may be asked how i come to have this knowledge about heavenly things which are far removed beyond human ken. my answer is that the sages have been taught by god that this natural world is only an image and material copy of a heavenly and spiritual pattern; that the very existence of this world is based upon the reality of its heavenly archetype.... thus the sage sees heaven reflected in nature as in a mirror, and he pursues this art, not for the sake of gold or silver, but for the love of the knowledge which it reveals." the _only true way_ advises all who wish to become true alchemists to leave the circuitous paths of pretended philosophers, and to follow nature, which is simple; the complicated processes described in books are said to be the traps laid by the "cunning sophists" to catch the unwary. in _a catechism of alchemy_, paracelsus asks: "what road should the philosopher follow?" he answers, "that exactly which was followed by the great architect of the universe in the creation of the world." one might suppose it would be easier, and perhaps more profitable, to examine, observe, and experiment, than to turn one's eyes inwards with the hope of discovering exactly "the road followed by the great architect of the universe in the creation of the world." but the alchemical method found it easier to begin by introspection. the alchemist spun his universe from his own ideas of order, symmetry, and simplicity, as the spider spins her web from her own substance. a favourite saying of the alchemists was, "what is above is as what is below." in one of its aspects this saying meant, "processes happen within the earth like those which occur on the earth; minerals and metals live, as animals and plants live; all pass through corruption towards perfection." in another aspect the saying meant "the human being is the world in miniature; as is the microcosm, so is the macrocosm; to know oneself is to know all the world." every man knows he ought to try to rise to better things, and many men endeavour to do what they know they ought to do; therefore, he who feels sure that all nature is fashioned after the image of man, projects his own ideas of progress, development, virtue, matter and spirit, on to nature outside himself; and, as a matter of course, this kind of naturalist uses the same language when he is speaking of the changes of material things as he employs to express the changes of his mental states, his hopes, fears, aspirations, and struggles. the language of the alchemists was, therefore, rich in such expressions as these; "the elements are to be so conjoined that the nobler and fuller life may be produced"; "our arcanum is gold exalted to the highest degree of perfection to which the combined action of nature and art can develop it." such commingling of ethical and physical ideas, such application of moral conceptions to material phenomena, was characteristic of the alchemical method of regarding nature. the necessary results were; great confusion of thought, much mystification of ideas, and a superabundance of _views_ about natural events. when the author of _the metamorphosis of metals_ was seeking for an argument in favour of his view, that water is the source and primal element of all things, he found what he sought in the biblical text: "in the beginning the spirit of god moved upon the face of the waters." similarly, the author of _the sodic hydrolith_ clenches his argument in favour of the existence of the philosopher's stone, by the quotation: "therefore, thus saith the lord; behold i lay in zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation. he that has it shall not be confounded." this author works out in detail an analogy between the functions and virtues of the _stone_, and the story of man's fall and redemption, as set forth in the old and new testaments. the same author speaks of "satan, that grim pseudo-alchemist." that the attribution, by the alchemists, of moral virtues and vices to natural things was in keeping with some deep-seated tendency of human nature, is shown by the persistence of some of their methods of stating the properties of substances: we still speak of "perfect and imperfect gases," "noble and base metals," "good and bad conductors of electricity," and "laws governing natural phenomena." convinced of the simplicity of nature, certain that all natural events follow one course, sure that this course was known to them and was represented by the growth of plants and animals, the alchemists set themselves the task, firstly, of proving by observations and experiments that their view of natural occurrences was correct; and, secondly, of discovering and gaining possession of the instrument whereby nature effects her transmutations and perfects her operations. the mastery of this instrument would give them power to change any metal into gold, the cure of all diseases, and the happiness which must come from the practical knowledge of the supreme secret of nature. the central quest of alchemy was the quest of an undefined and undefinable something wherein was supposed to be contained all the powers and potencies of life, and whatever makes life worth living. the names given to this mystical something were as many as the properties which were assigned to it. it was called _the one thing, the essence, the philosopher's stone, the stone of wisdom, the heavenly balm, the divine water, the virgin water, the carbuncle of the sun, the old dragon, the lion, the basilisk, the phoenix_; and many other names were given to it. we may come near to expressing the alchemist's view of the essential character of the object of their search by naming it _the soul of all things_. "alchemy," a modern writer says, "is the science of the soul of all things." the essence was supposed to have a material form, an ethereal or middle nature, and an immaterial or spiritual life. no one might hope to make this essence from any one substance, because, as one of the alchemists says, "it is the attribute of god alone to make one out of one; you must produce one thing out of two by natural generation." the alchemists did not pretend to create gold, but only to produce it from other things. the author of _a brief guide to the celestial ruby_ says: "we do not, as is sometimes said, profess to create gold and silver, but only to find an agent which ... is capable of entering into an intimate and maturing union with the mercury of the base metals." and again: "our art ... only arrogates to itself the power of developing, through the removal of all defects and superfluities, the golden nature which the baser metals possess." bonus, in his tract on _the new pearl of great price_ ( th century), says: "the art of alchemy ... does not create metals, or even develop them out of the metallic first-substance; it only takes up the unfinished handicraft of nature and completes it.... nature has only left a comparatively small thing for the artist to do--the completion of that which she has already begun." if the essence were ever attained, it would be by following the course which nature follows in producing the perfect plant from the imperfect seed, by discovering and separating the seed of metals, and bringing that seed under the conditions which alone are suitable for its growth. metals must have seed, the alchemists said, for it would be absurd to suppose they have none. "what prerogative have vegetables above metals," exclaims one of them, "that god should give seed to the one and withhold it from the other? are not metals as much in his sight as trees?" as metals, then, possess seed, it is evident how this seed is to be made active; the seed of a plant is quickened by descending into the earth, therefore the seed of metals must be destroyed before it becomes life-producing. "the processes of our art must begin with dissolution of gold; they must terminate in a restoration of the essential quality of gold." "gold does not easily give up its nature, and will fight for its life; but our agent is strong enough to overcome and kill it, and then it also has power to restore it to life, and to change the lifeless remains into a new and pure body." the application of the doctrine of the existence of seed in metals led to the performance of many experiments, and, hence, to the accumulation of a considerable body of facts established by experimental inquiries. the belief of the alchemists that all natural events are connected by a hidden thread, that everything has an influence on other things, that "what is above is as what is below," constrained them to place stress on the supposed connexion between the planets and the metals, and to further their metallic transformations by performing them at times when certain planets were in conjunction. the seven principal planets and the seven principal metals were called by the same names: _sol_ (gold), _luna_ (silver), _saturn_ (lead), _jupiter_ (tin), _mars_ (iron), _venus_ (copper), and _mercury_ (mercury). the author of _the new chemical light_ taught that one metal could be propagated from another only in the order of superiority of the planets. he placed the seven planets in the following descending order: saturn, jupiter, mars, sol, venus, mercury, luna. "the virtues of the planets descend," he said, "but do not ascend"; it is easy to change mars (iron) into venus (copper), for instance, but venus cannot be transformed into mars. although the alchemists regarded everything as influencing, and influenced by, other things, they were persuaded that the greatest effects are produced on a substance by substances of like nature with itself. hence, most of them taught that the seed of metals will be obtained by operations with metals, not by the action on metals of things of animal or vegetable origin. each class of substances, they said, has a life, or spirit (an essential character, we might say) of its own. "the life of sulphur," paracelsus said, "is a combustible, ill-smelling, fatness.... the life of gems and corals is mere colour.... the life of water is its flowing.... the life of fire is air." grant an attraction of like to like, and the reason becomes apparent for such directions as these: "nothing heterogeneous must be introduced into our magistery"; "everything should be made to act on that which is like it, and then nature will perform her duty." although each class of substances was said by the alchemists to have its own particular character, or life, nevertheless they taught that there is a deep-seated likeness between all things, inasmuch as the power of _the essence_, or _the one thing_, is so great that under its influence different things are produced from the same origin, and different things are caused to pass into and become the same thing. in _the new chemical light_ it is said: "while the seed of all things is one, it is made to generate a great variety of things." it is not easy now--it could not have been easy at any time--to give clear and exact meanings to the doctrines of the alchemists, or the directions they gave for performing the operations necessary for the production of the object of their search. and the difficulty is much increased when we are told that "the sage jealously conceals [his knowledge] from the sinner and the scornful, lest the mysteries of heaven should be laid bare to the vulgar gaze." we almost despair when an alchemical writer assures us that the sages "set pen to paper for the express purpose of concealing their meaning. the sense of a whole passage is often hopelessly obscured by the addition or omission of one little word, for instance the addition of the word _not_ in the wrong place." another writer says: "the sages are in the habit of using words which may convey either a true or a false impression; the former to their own disciples and children, the latter to the ignorant, the foolish, and the unworthy." sometimes, after descriptions of processes couched in strange and mystical language, the writer will add, "if you cannot perceive what you ought to understand herein, you should not devote yourself to the study of philosophy." philalethes, in his _brief guide to the celestial ruby_, seems to feel some pity for his readers; after describing what he calls "the generic homogeneous water of gold," he says: "if you wish for a more particular description of our water, i am impelled by motives of charity to tell you that it is living, flexible, clear, nitid, white as snow, hot, humid, airy, vaporous, and digestive." alchemy began by asserting that nature must be simple; it assumed that a knowledge of the plan and method of natural occurrences is to be obtained by thinking; and it used analogy as the guide in applying this knowledge of nature's design to particular events, especially the analogy, assumed by alchemy to exist, between material phenomena and human emotions. chapter iii. the alchemical conception of the unity and simplicity of nature. in the preceding chapter i have referred to the frequent use made by the alchemists of their supposition that nature follows the same plan, or at any rate a very similar plan, in all her processes. if this supposition is accepted, the primary business of an investigator of nature is to trace likenesses and analogies between what seem on the surface to be dissimilar and unconnected events. as this idea, and this practice, were the foundations whereon the superstructure of alchemy was raised, i think it is important to amplify them more fully than i have done already. mention is made in many alchemical writings of a mythical personage named _hermes trismegistus_, who is said to have lived a little later than the time of moses. representations of hermes trismegistus are found on ancient egyptian monuments. we are told that alexander the great found his tomb near hebron; and that the tomb contained a slab of emerald whereon thirteen sentences were written. the eighth sentence is rendered in many alchemical books as follows: "ascend with the greatest sagacity from the earth to heaven, and then again descend to the earth, and unite together the powers of things superior and things inferior. thus you will obtain the glory of the whole world, and obscurity will fly away from you." this sentence evidently teaches the unity of things in heaven and things on earth, and asserts the possibility of gaining, not merely a theoretical, but also a practical, knowledge of the essential characters of all things. moreover, the sentence implies that this fruitful knowledge is to be obtained by examining nature, using as guide the fundamental similarity supposed to exist between things above and things beneath. the alchemical writers constantly harp on this theme: follow nature; provided you never lose the clue, which is simplicity and similarity. the author of _the only way_ ( ) beseeches his readers "to enlist under the standard of that method which proceeds in strict obedience to the teaching of nature ... in short, the method which nature herself pursues in the bowels of the earth." the alchemists tell us not to expect much help from books and written directions. when one of them has said all he can say, he adds--"the question is whether even this book will convey any information to one before whom the writings of the sages and the open book of nature are exhibited in vain." another tells his readers the only thing for them is "to beseech god to give you the real philosophical temper, and to open your eyes to the facts of nature; thus alone will you reach the coveted goal." "follow nature" is sound advice. but, nature was to be followed with eyes closed save to one vision, and the vision was to be seen before the following began. the alchemists' general conception of nature led them to assign to every substance a condition or state natural to it, and wherein alone it could be said to be as it was designed to be. each substance, they taught, could be caused to leave its natural state only by violent, or non-natural, means, and any substance which had been driven from its natural condition by violence was ready, and even eager, to return to the condition consonant with its nature. thus norton, in his _ordinal of alchemy_, says: "metals are generated in the earth, for above ground they are subject to rust; hence above ground is the place of corruption of metals, and of their gradual destruction. the cause which we assign to this fact is that above ground they are not in their proper element, and an unnatural position is destructive to natural objects, as we see, for instance, that fishes die when they are taken out of the water; and as it is natural for men, beasts, and birds to live in the air, so stones and metals are naturally generated under the earth." in his _new pearl of great price_ ( th century), bonus says:--"the object of nature in all things is to introduce into each substance the form which properly belongs to it; and this is also the design of our art." this view assumed the knowledge of the natural conditions of the substances wherewith experiments were performed. it supposed that man could act as a guide, to bring back to its natural condition a substance which had been removed from that condition, either by violent processes of nature, or by man's device. the alchemist regarded himself as an arbiter in questions concerning the natural condition of each substance he dealt with. he thought he could say, "this substance ought to be thus, or thus," "that substance is constrained, thwarted, hindered from becoming what nature meant it to be." in ben jonson's play called _the alchemist_, subtle (who is the alchemist of the play) says, " ... metals would be gold if they had time." the alchemist not only attributed ethical qualities to material things, he also became the guardian and guide of the moral practices of these things. he thought himself able to recall the erring metal to the path of metalline virtue, to lead the extravagant mineral back to the moral home-life from which it had been seduced, to show the doubting and vacillating salt what it was ignorantly seeking, and to help it to find the unrealised object of its search. the alchemist acted as a sort of conscience to the metals, minerals, salts, and other substances he submitted to the processes of his laboratory. he treated them as a wise physician might treat an ignorant and somewhat refractory patient. "i know what you want better than you do," he seems often to be saying to the metals he is calcining, separating, joining and subliming. but the ignorant alchemist was not always thanked for his treatment. sometimes the patient rebelled. for instance, michael sendivogius, in his tract, _the new chemical light drawn from the fountain of nature and of manual experience_ ( th century), recounts _a dialogue between mercury, the alchemist, and nature_. "on a certain bright morning a number of alchemists met together in a meadow, and consulted as to the best way of preparing the philosopher's stone.... most of them agreed that mercury was the first substance. others said, no, it was sulphur, or something else.... just as the dispute began to run high, there arose a violent wind, which dispersed the alchemists into all the different countries of the world; and as they had arrived at no conclusion, each one went on seeking the philosopher's stone in his own old way, this one expecting to find it in one substance, and that in another, so that the search has continued without intermission even unto this day. one of them, however, had at least got the idea into his head that mercury was the substance of the stone, and determined to concentrate all his efforts on the chemical preparation of mercury.... he took common mercury and began to work with it. he placed it in a glass vessel over the fire, when it, of course, evaporated. so in his ignorance he struck his wife, and said: 'no one but you has entered my laboratory; you must have taken my mercury out of the vessel.' the woman, with tears, protested her innocence. the alchemist put some more mercury into the vessel.... the mercury rose to the top of the vessel in vaporous steam. then the alchemist was full of joy, because he remembered that the first substance of the stone is described by the sages as volatile; and he thought that now at last he _must_ be on the right track. he now began to subject the mercury to all sorts of chemical processes, to sublime it, and to calcine it with all manner of things, with salts, sulphur, metals, minerals, blood, hair, aqua fortis, herbs, urine, and vinegar.... everything he could think of was tried; but without producing the desired effect." the alchemist then despaired; after a dream, wherein an old man came and talked with him about the "mercury of the sages," the alchemist thought he would charm the mercury, and so he used a form of incantation. the mercury suddenly began to speak, and asked the alchemist why he had troubled him so much, and so on. the alchemist replied, and questioned the mercury. the mercury makes fun of the philosopher. then the alchemist again torments the mercury by heating him with all manner of horrible things. at last mercury calls in the aid of nature, who soundly rates the philosopher, tells him he is grossly ignorant, and ends by saying: "the best thing you can do is to give yourself up to the king's officers, who will quickly put an end to you and your philosophy." as long as men were fully persuaded that they knew the plan whereon the world was framed, that it was possible for them to follow exactly "the road which was followed by the great architect of the universe in the creation of the world," a real knowledge of natural events was impossible; for every attempt to penetrate nature's secrets presupposed a knowledge of the essential characteristics of that which was to be investigated. but genuine knowledge begins when the investigator admits that he must learn of nature, not nature of him. it might be truly said of one who held the alchemical conception of nature that "his foible was omniscience"; and omniscience negatives the attainment of knowledge. the alchemical notion of a natural state as proper to each substance was vigorously combated by the honourable robert boyle (born , died ), a man of singularly clear and penetrative intellect. in _a paradox of the natural and supernatural states of bodies, especially of the air_, boyle says:--"i know that not only in living, but even in inanimate, bodies, of which alone i here discourse, men have universally admitted the famous distinction between the natural and preternatural, or violent state of bodies, and do daily, without the least scruple, found upon it hypotheses and ratiocinations, as if it were most certain that what they call nature had purposely formed bodies in such a determinate state, and were always watchful that they should not by any external violence be put out of it. but notwithstanding so general a consent of men in this point, i confess, i cannot yet be satisfied about it in the sense wherein it is wont to be taken. it is not, that i believe, that there is no sense in which, or in the account upon which, a body may he said to be in its natural state; but that i think the common distinction of a natural and violent state of bodies has not been clearly explained and considerately settled, and both is not well grounded, and is oftentimes ill applied. for when i consider that whatever state a body be put into, or kept in, it obtains or retains that state, assenting to the catholic laws of nature, i cannot think it fit to deny that in this sense the body proposed is in a natural state; but then, upon the same ground, it will he hard to deny but that those bodies which are said to be in a violent state may also be in a natural one, since the violence they are presumed to suffer from outward agents is likewise exercised no otherwise than according to the established laws of universal nature." there must be something very fascinating and comforting in the alchemical view of nature, as a harmony constructed on one simple plan, which can be grasped as a whole, and also in its details, by the introspective processes of the human intellect; for that conception prevails to-day among those who have not investigated natural occurrences for themselves. the alchemical view of nature still forms the foundation of systems of ethics, of philosophy, of art. it appeals to the innate desire of man to make himself the measure of all things. it is so easy, so authoritative, apparently so satisfactory. no amount of thinking and reasoning will ever demonstrate its falsity. it can be conquered only by a patient, unbiassed, searching examination of some limited portion of natural events. chapter iv. the alchemical elements and principles. the alchemists were sure that the intention of nature regarding metals was that they should become gold, for gold was considered to be the most perfect metal, and nature, they said, evidently strains after perfection. the alchemist found that metals were worn away, eaten through, broken, and finally caused to disappear, by many acid and acrid liquids which he prepared from mineral substances. but gold resisted the attacks of these liquids; it was not changed by heat, nor was it affected by sulphur, a substance which changed limpid, running mercury into an inert, black solid. hence, gold was more perfect in the alchemical scale than any other metal. since gold was considered to be the most perfect metal, it was self-evident to the alchemical mind that nature must form gold slowly in the earth, must transmute gradually the inferior metals into gold. "the only thing that distinguishes one metal from another," writes an alchemist who went under the name of philalethes, "is its degree of maturity, which is, of course, greatest in the most precious metals; the difference between gold and lead is not one of substance, but of digestion; in the baser metal the coction has not been such as to purge out its metallic impurities. if by any means this superfluous impure matter could be organically removed from the baser metals, they would become gold and silver. so miners tell us that lead has in many cases developed into silver in the bowels of the earth, and we contend that the same effect is produced in a much shorter time by means of our art." stories were told about the finding of gold in deserted mines which had been worked out long before; these stories were supposed to prove that gold was bred in the earth. the facts that pieces of silver were found in tin and lead mines, and gold was found in silver mines, were adduced as proofs that, as the author of _the new pearl of great price_ says, "nature is continually at work changing other metals into gold, because, though in a certain sense they are complete in themselves, they have not yet reached the highest perfection of which they are capable, and to which nature has destined them." what nature did in the earth man could accomplish in the workshop. for is not man the crown of the world, the masterpiece of nature, the flower of the universe; was he not given dominion over all things when the world was created? in asserting that the baser metals could be transmuted into gold, and in attempting to effect this transmutation, the alchemist was not acting on a vague; haphazard surmise; he was pursuing a policy dictated by his conception of the order of nature; he was following the method which he conceived to be that used by nature herself. the transmutation of metals was part and parcel of a system of natural philosophy. if this transmutation were impossible, the alchemical scheme of things would be destroyed, the believer in the transmutation would be left without a sense of order in the material universe. and, moreover, the alchemist's conception of an orderly material universe was so intimately connected with his ideas of morality and religion, that to disprove the possibility of the great transmutation would be to remove not only the basis of his system of material things, but the foundations of his system of ethics also. to take away his belief in the possibility of changing other metals into gold would be to convert the alchemist into an atheist. how, then, was the transmutation to be accomplished? evidently by the method whereby nature brings to perfection other living things; for the alchemist's belief in the simplicity and unity of nature compelled him to regard metals as living things. plants are improved by appropriate culture, by digging and enriching the soil, by judicious selection of seed; animals are improved by careful breeding. by similar processes metals will be encouraged and helped towards perfection. the perfect state of gold will not be reached at a bound; it will be gained gradually. many partial purifications will be needed. as _subtle_ says in _the alchemist_-- 'twere absurd to think that nature in the earth bred gold perfect in the instant; something went before, there must be remote matter.... nature doth first beget the imperfect, then proceeds she to the perfect. at this stage the alchemical argument becomes very ultra-physical. it may, perhaps, be rendered somewhat as follows:-- man is the most perfect of animals; in man there is a union of three parts, these are body, soul, and spirit. metals also may be said to have a body, a soul, and a spirit; there is a specific bodily, or material, form belonging to each metal; there is a metalline soul characteristic of this or that class of metals; there is a spirit, or inner immaterial potency, which is the very essence of all metals. the soul and spirit of man are clogged by his body. if the spiritual nature is to become the dominating partner, the body must be mortified: the alchemists, of course, used this kind of imagery, and it was very real to them. in like manner the spirit of metals will be laid bare and enabled to exercise its transforming influences, only when the material form of the individual metal has been destroyed. the first thing to do, then, is to strip off and cast aside those properties of metals which appeal to the senses. "it is necessary to deprive matter of its qualities in order to draw out its soul," said stephanus of alexandria in the th century; and in the th century paracelsus said, "nothing of true value is located in the body of a substance, but in the virtue ... the less there is of body the more in proportion is the virtue." but the possession of the soul of metals is not the final stage: mastery of the soul may mean the power of transmuting a metal into another like itself; it will not suffice for the great transmutation, for in that process a metal becomes gold, the one and only perfect metal. hence the soul also must be removed, in order that the spirit, the essence, the kernel, may be obtained. and as it is with metals, so, the alchemists argued, it is with all things. there are a few _principles_ which may be thought of as conditioning the specific bodily and material forms of things; beneath these, there are certain _elements_ which are common to many things whose principles are not the same; and, hidden by the wrappings of elements and principles, there is the one _essence_, the spirit, the mystic uniting bond, the final goal of the philosopher. i propose in this chapter to try to analyse the alchemical conceptions of elements and principles, and in the next chapter to attempt some kind of description of the essence. in his _tract concerning the great stone of the ancient sages_, basil valentine speaks of the "three principles," salt, sulphur, and mercury, the source of which is the elements. "there are four elements, and each has at its centre another element which makes it what it is. these are the four pillars of the earth." of the element _earth_, he says:--"in this element the other three, especially fire, are latent.... it is gross and porous, specifically heavy, but naturally light.... it receives all that the other three project into it, conscientiously conceals what it should hide, and brings to light that which it should manifest.... outwardly it is visible and fixed, inwardly it is invisible and volatile." of the element _water_, basil valentine says:--"outwardly it is volatile, inwardly it is fixed, cold, and humid.... it is the solvent of the world, and exists in three degrees of excellence: the pure, the purer, and the purest. of its purest substance the heavens were created; of that which is less pure the atmospheric air was formed; that which is simply pure remains in its proper sphere where ... it is guardian of all subtle substances here below." concerning the element _air_, he writes:--"the most noble element of air ... is volatile, but may be fixed, and when fixed renders all bodies penetrable.... it is nobler than earth or water.... it nourishes, impregnates, conserves the other elements." finally, of the element _fire_:--"fire is the purest and noblest of all elements, full of adhesive unctuous corrosiveness, penetrant, digestive, inwardly fixed, hot and dry, outwardly visible, and tempered by the earth.... this element is the most passive of all, and resembles a chariot; when it is drawn, it moves; when it is not drawn, it stands still." basil valentine then tells his readers that adam was compounded of the four pure elements, but after his expulsion from paradise he became subject to the various impurities of the animal creation. "the pure elements of his creation were gradually mingled and infected with the corruptible elements of the outer world, and thus his body became more and more gross, and liable, through its grossness, to natural decay and death." the process of degeneration was slow at first, but "as time went on, the seed out of which men were generated became more and more infected with perishable elements. the continued use of corruptible food rendered their bodies more and more gross; and human life was soon reduced to a very brief span." basil valentine then deals with the formation of the three _principles_ of things, by the mutual action of the four elements. fire acting on air produced _sulphur_; air acting on water produced _mercury_; water acting on earth produced _salt_. earth having nothing to act on produced nothing, but became the nurse of the three principles. "the three principles," he says, "are necessary because they are the immediate substance of metals. the remoter substance of metals is the four elements, but no one can produce anything out of them but god; and even god makes nothing of them but these three principles." to endeavour to obtain the four pure elements is a hopeless task. but the sage has the three principles at hand. "the artist should determine which of the three principles he is seeking, and should assist it so that it may overcome its contrary." "the art consists in an even mingling of the virtues of the elements; in the natural equilibrium of the hot, the dry, the cold, and the moist." the account of the elements given by philalethes differs from that of basil valentine. philalethes enumerates three elements only: air, water, and earth. things are not formed by the mixture of these elements, for "dissimilar things can never really unite." by analysing the properties of the three elements, philalethes reduced them finally to one, namely, water. "water," he says, "is the first principle of all things." "earth is the fundamental element in which all bodies grow and are preserved. air is the medium into which they grow, and by means of which the celestial virtues are communicated to them." according to philalethes, _mercury_ is the most important of the three principles. although gold is formed by the aid of mercury, it is only when mercury has been matured, developed, and perfected, that it is able to transmute inferior metals into gold. the essential thing to do is, therefore, to find an agent which will bring about the maturing and perfecting of mercury. this agent, philalethes calls "our divine arcanum." although it appears to me impossible to translate the sayings of the alchemists concerning elements and principles into expressions which shall have definite and exact meanings for us to-day, still we may, perhaps, get an inkling of the meaning of such sentences as those i have quoted from basil valentine and philalethes. take the terms _fire_ and _water_. in former times all liquid substances were supposed to be liquid because they possessed something in common; this hypothetical something was called the _element, water_. similarly, the view prevailed until comparatively recent times, that burning substances burn because of the presence in them of a hypothetical imponderable fluid, called "_caloric_"; the alchemists preferred to call this indefinable something an element, and to name it _fire_. we are accustomed to-day to use the words _fire_ and _water_ with different meanings, according to the ideas we wish to express. when we say "do not touch the fire," or "put your hand into the water," we are regarding fire and water as material things; when we say "the house is on fire," or speak of "a diamond of the first water," we are thinking of the condition or state of a burning body, or of a substance as transparent as water. when we say "put out the fire," or "his heart became as water," we are referring to the act of burning, or are using an image which likens the thing spoken of to a substance in the act of liquefying. as we do to-day, so the alchemists did before us; they used the words _fire_ and _water_ to express different ideas. such terms as hardness, softness, coldness, toughness, and the like, are employed for the purpose of bringing together into one point of view different things which are alike in, at least, one respect. hard things may differ in size, weight, shape, colour, texture, &c. a soft thing may weigh the same as a hard thing; both may have the same colour or the same size, or be at the same temperature, and so on. by classing together various things as hard or soft, or smooth or rough, we eliminate (for the time) all the properties wherein the things differ, and regard them only as having one property in common. the words hardness, softness, &c., are useful class-marks. similarly the alchemical elements and principles were useful class-marks. we must not suppose that when the alchemists spoke of certain things as formed from, or by the union of, the same elements or the same principles, they meant that these things contained a common substance. their elements and principles were not thought of as substances, at least not in the modern meaning of the expression, _a substance_; they were qualities only. if we think of the alchemical elements earth, air, fire, and water, as general expressions of what seemed to the alchemists the most important properties of all substances, we may be able to attach some kind of meaning to the sayings of basil valentine, which i have quoted. for instance, when that alchemist tells us, "fire is the most passive of all elements, and resembles a chariot; when it is drawn, it moves; when it is not drawn, it stands still"--we may suppose he meant to express the fact that a vast number of substances can be burnt, and that combustion does not begin of itself, but requires an external agency to start it. unfortunately, most of the terms which the alchemists used to designate their elements and principles are terms which are now employed to designate specific substances. the word _fire_ is still employed rather as a quality of many things under special conditions, than as a specific substance; but _earth_, _water_, _air_, _salt_, _sulphur_, and _mercury_, are to-day the names applied to certain groups of properties, each of which is different from all other groups of properties, and is, therefore, called, in ordinary speech, a definite kind of matter. as knowledge became more accurate and more concentrated, the words _sulphur_, _salt_, _mercury_, &c., began to be applied to distinct substances, and as these terms were still employed in their alchemical sense as compendious expressions for certain qualities common to great classes of substances, much confusion arose. kunckel, the discoverer of phosphorus, who lived between and , complained of the alchemists' habit of giving different names to the same substance, and the same name to different substances. "the sulphur of one," he says, "is not the sulphur of another, to the great injury of science. to that one replies that everyone is perfectly free to baptise his infant as he pleases. granted. you may if you like call an ass an ox, but you will never make anyone believe that your ox is an ass." boyle is very severe on the vague and loose use of words practised by so many writers of his time. in _the sceptical chymist_ (published - ) he says: "if judicious men, skilled in chymical affairs, shall once agree to write clearly and plainly of them, and thereby keep men from being stunned, as it were, or imposed upon by dark and empty words; it is to be hoped that these [other] men finding, that they can no longer write impertinently and absurdly, without being laughed at for doing so, will be reduced either to write nothing, or books that may teach us something, and not rob men, as formerly, of invaluable time; and so ceasing to trouble the world with riddles or impertinences, we shall either by their books receive an advantage, or by their silence escape an inconvenience." most of the alchemists taught that the elements produced what they called _seed_, by their mutual reactions, and the principles matured this seed and brought it to perfection. they supposed that each class, or kind, of things had its own seed, and that to obtain the seed was to have the power of producing the things which sprung from that seed. some of them, however, asserted that all things come from a common seed, and that the nature of the products of this seed is conditioned by the circumstances under which it is caused to develop. thus michael sendivogius writes as follows in _the new chemical light, drawn from the fountain of nature and of manual experience_ ( th century):-- "wherever there is seed, nature will work through it, whether it be good or bad." "the four elements, by their continued action, project a constant supply of seed to the centre of the earth, where it is digested, and whence it proceeds again in generative motions. now the centre of the earth is a certain void place where nothing is at rest, and upon the margin or circumference of this centre the four elements project their qualities.... the magnetic force of our earth-centre attracts to itself as much as is needed of the cognate seminal substance, while that which cannot be used for vital generation is thrust forth in the shape of stones and other rubbish. this is the fountain-head of all things terrestrial. let us illustrate the matter by supposing a glass of water to be set in the middle of a table, round the margin of which are placed little heaps of salt, and of powders of different colours. if the water be poured out, it will run all over the table in divergent rivulets, and will become salt where it touches the salt, red where it touches the red powder, and so on. the water does not change the '_places_,' but the several '_places_' differentiate the water.[ ] in the same way, the seed which is the product of the four elements is projected in all directions from the earth-centre, and produces different things, according to the quality of the different places. thus, while the seed of all things is one, it is made to generate a great variety of things.... so long as nature's seed remains in the centre it can indifferently produce a tree or a metal, a herb or a stone, and in like manner, according to the purity of the place, it will produce what is less or more pure." [ ] the author i am quoting had said--"nature is divided into four '_places_' in which she brings forth all things that appear and that are in the shade; and according to the good or bad quality of the '_place_,' she brings forth good or bad things.... it is most important for us to know her '_places_' ... in order that we may join things together according to nature." chapter v. the alchemical essence. in the last chapter i tried to describe the alchemical view of the interdependence of different substances. taking for granted the tripartite nature of man, the co-existence in him of body, soul, and spirit (no one of which was defined), the alchemists concluded that all things are formed as man is formed; that in everything there is a specific bodily form, some portion of soul, and a dash of spirit. i considered the term _soul_ to be the alchemical name for the properties common to a class of substances, and the term _spirit_ to mean the property which was thought by the alchemists to be common to all things. the alchemists considered it possible to arrange all substances in four general classes, the marks whereof were expressed by the terms hot, cold, moist, and dry; they thought of these properties as typified by what they called the four elements--fire, air, water, and earth. everything, they taught, was produced from the four elements, not immediately, but through the mediation of the three principles--mercury, sulphur, and salt. these principles were regarded as the tools put into the hands of him who desired to effect the transmutation of one substance into another. the principles were not thought of as definite substances, nor as properties of this or that specified substance; they were considered to be the characteristic properties of large classes of substances. the chemist of to-day places many compounds in the same class because all are acids, because all react similarly under similar conditions. it used to be said that every acid possesses more or less of _the principle of acidity_. lavoisier changed the language whereby certain facts concerning acids were expressed. he thought that experiments proved all acids to be compounds of the element oxygen; and for many years after lavoisier, the alchemical expression _the principle of acidity_ was superseded by the word _oxygen_. although lavoisier recognised that not every compound of oxygen is an acid, he taught that every acid is a compound of oxygen. we know now that many acids are not compounds of oxygen, but we have not yet sufficient knowledge to frame a complete definition of the term _acid_. nevertheless it is convenient, indeed it is necessary, to place together many compounds which react similarly under certain defined conditions, and to give a common name to them all. the alchemists also classified substances, but their classification was necessarily more vague than ours; and they necessarily expressed their reasons for putting different substances in the same class in a language which arose out of the general conceptions of natural phenomena which prevailed in their time. the primary classification of substances made by the alchemists was expressed by saying; these substances are rich in the principle _sulphur_, those contain much of the principle _mercury_, and this class is marked by the preponderance of the principle _salt_. the secondary classification of the alchemists was expressed by saying; this class is characterised by dryness, that by moisture, another by coldness, and a fourth by hotness; the dry substances contain much of the element _earth_, the moist substances are rich in the element _water_, in the cold substances the element _air_ preponderates, and the hot substances contain more of the element _fire_ than of the other elements. the alchemists went a step further in their classification of things. they asserted that there is one thing present in all things; that everything is a vehicle for the more or less perfect exhibition of the properties of the one thing; that there is a primal element common to all substances. the final aim of alchemy was to obtain the one thing, the primal element, the soul of all things, so purified, not only from all specific substances, but also from all admixture of the four elements and the three principles, as to make possible the accomplishment of any transmutation by the use of it. if a person ignorant of its powers were to obtain the essence, he might work vast havoc and cause enormous confusion; it was necessary, therefore, to know the conditions under which the potencies of the essence became active. hence there was need of prolonged study of the mutual actions of the most seemingly diverse substances, and of minute and patient examination of the conditions under which nature performs her marvellous transmutations. the quest of the one thing was fraught with peril, and was to be attempted only by those who had served a long and laborious apprenticeship. in _the chemical treatise of thomas norton, the englishman, called believe-me, or the ordinal of alchemy_ ( th century), the adept is warned not to disclose his secrets to ordinary people. "you should carefully test and examine the life, character, and mental aptitudes of any person who would be initiated in this art, and then you should bind him, by a sacred oath, not to let our magistery be commonly or vulgarly known. only when he begins to grow old and feeble, he may reveal it to one person, but not to more, and that one man must be virtuous.... if any wicked man should learn to practise the art, the event would be fraught with great danger to christendom. for such a man would overstep all bounds of moderation, and would remove from their hereditary thrones those legitimate princes who rule over the peoples of christendom." the results of the experimental examination of the compositions and properties of substances, made since the time of the alchemists, have led to the modern conception of the chemical element, and the isolation of about seventy or eighty different elements. no substance now called an element has been produced in the laboratory by uniting two, or more, distinct substances, nor has any been separated into two, or more, unlike portions. the only decided change which a chemical element has been caused to undergo is the combination of it with some other element or elements, or with a compound or compounds. but it is possible that all the chemical elements may be combinations of different quantities of one primal element. certain facts make this supposition tenable; and some chemists expect that the supposition will be proved to be correct. if the hypothetical primal element should be isolated, we should have fulfilled the aim of alchemy, and gained the one thing; but the fulfilment would not be that whereof the alchemists dreamed. inasmuch as the alchemical essence was thought of as the universal spirit to whose presence is due whatever degree of perfection any specific substance exhibits, it followed that the more perfect a substance the greater is the quantity of the essence in it. but even in the most perfect substance found in nature--which substance, the alchemists said, is gold--the essence is hidden by wrappings of specific properties which prevent the ordinary man from recognising it. remove these wrappings from some special substance, and you have the perfect form of that thing; you have some portion of the universal spirit joined to the one general property of the class of things whereof the particular substance is a member. then remove the class-property, often spoken of by the alchemists as _the life_, of the substance, and you have the essence itself. the alchemists thought that to every thing, or at any rate to every class of things, there corresponds a more perfect form than that which we see and handle; they spoke of gold, and the _gold of the sages_; mercury, and the _mercury of the philosophers_; sulphur, and the _heavenly sulphur of him whose eyes are opened_. to remove the outer wrappings of ordinary properties which present themselves to the untrained senses, was regarded by the alchemists to be a difficult task; to tear away the soul (the class-property) of a substance, and yet retain the essence which made that substance its dwelling place, was possible only after vast labour, and by the use of the proper agent working under the proper conditions. an exceedingly powerful, delicate, and refined agent was needed; and the mastery of the agent was to be acquired by bitter experience, and, probably, after many disappointments. "gold," an alchemist tells us, "does not easily give up its nature, and will fight for its life; but our agent is strong enough to overcome and kill it, and then it also has the power to restore it to life, and to change the lifeless remains into a new and pure body." thomas norton, the author of _the ordinal of alchemy_, writing in the th century, says the worker in transmutations is often tempted to be in a hurry, or to despair, and he is often deceived. his servants will be either stupid and faithful, or quick-witted and false. he may be robbed of everything when his work is almost finished. the only remedies are infinite patience, a sense of virtue, and sound reason. "in the pursuit of our art," he says, "you should take care, from time to time, to unbend your mind from its sterner employments with some convenient recreation." the choice of workmen to aid in the mechanical parts of the quest was a great trouble to the alchemists. on this subject norton says--"if you would be free from all fear over the gross work, follow my counsel, and never engage married men; for they soon give in and pretend they are tired out.... hire your workmen for certain stipulated wages, and not for longer periods than twenty-four hours at a time. give them higher wages than they would receive elsewhere, and be prompt and ready in your payments." many accounts are given by alchemical writers of the agent, and many names are bestowed on it. the author of _a brief guide to the celestial ruby_ speaks thus of the agent--"it is our doorkeeper, our balm, our honey, oil, urine, maydew, mother, egg, secret furnace, oven, true fire, venomous dragon, theriac, ardent wine, green lion, bird of hermes, goose of hermogenes, two-edged sword in the hand of the cherub that guards the tree of life.... it is our true secret vessel, and the garden of the sages in which our sun rises and sets. it is our royal mineral, our triumphant vegetable saturnia, and the magic rod of hermes, by means of which he assumes any shape he likes." sometimes we are told that the agent is mercury, sometimes that it is gold, but not common mercury or common gold. "supplement your common mercury with the inward fire which it needs, and you will soon get rid of all superfluous dross." "the agent is gold, as highly matured as natural and artificial digestion can make it, and a thousand times more perfect than the common metal of that name. gold, thus exalted, radically penetrates, tinges, and fixes metals." the alchemists generally likened the work to be performed by their agent to the killing of a living thing. they constantly use the allegory of death, followed by resurrection, in describing the steps whereby the essence was to be obtained, and the processes whereby the baser metals were to be partially purified. they speak of the mortification of metals, the dissolution and putrefaction of substances, as preliminaries to the appearance of the true life of the things whose outward properties have been destroyed. for instance, paracelsus says: "destruction perfects that which is good; for the good cannot appear on account of that which conceals it." the same alchemist speaks of rusting as the mortification of metals; he says: "the mortification of metals is the removal of their bodily structure.... the mortification of woods is their being turned into charcoal or ashes." paracelsus distinguishes natural from artificial mortification, "whatever nature consumes," he says, "man cannot restore. but whatever man destroys man can restore, and break again when restored." things which had been mortified by man's device were considered by paracelsus not to be really dead. he gives this extraordinary illustration of his meaning: "you see this is the case with lions, which are all born dead, and are first vitalised by the horrible noise of their parents, just as a sleeping person is awakened by a shout." the mortification of metals is represented in alchemical books by various images and allegories. fig. i. is reduced from a cut in a th century work, _the book of lambspring, a noble ancient philosopher, concerning the philosophical stone_. [illustration: here the father devours the son; the soul and spirit flow forth from the body. fig. i.] the image used to set forth the mortification of metals is a king swallowing his son. figs. ii. and iii. are reduced from basil valentine's _twelve keys_. both of these figures represent the process of mortification by images connected with death and burial. [illustration: fig. ii.] in his explanation (?) of these figures, basil valentine says:-- "neither human nor animal bodies can be multiplied or propagated without decomposition; the grain and all vegetable seed, when cast into the ground, must decay before it can spring up again; moreover, putrefaction imparts life to many worms and other animalculæ.... if bread is placed in honey, and suffered to decay, ants are generated ... maggots are also developed by the decay of nuts, apples, and pears. the same thing may be observed in regard to vegetable life. nettles and other weeds spring up where no such seed has ever been sown. this occurs only by putrefaction. the reason is that the soil in such places is so disposed, and, as it were, impregnated, that it produces these fruits; which is a result of the properties of sidereal influences; consequently the seed is spiritually produced in the earth, and putrefies in the earth, and by the operation of the elements generates corporeal matter according to the species of nature. thus the stars and the elements may generate new spiritual, and ultimately, new vegetable seed, by means of putrefaction.... know that, in like manner, no metallic seed can develop, or multiply, unless the said seed, by itself alone, and without the introduction of any foreign substance, be reduced to a perfect putrefaction." [illustration: fig. iii.] the action of the mineral agent in perfecting substances is often likened by the alchemists to the conjoining of the male and the female, followed by the production of offspring. they insist on the need of a union of two things, in order to produce something more perfect than either. the agent, they say, must work upon something; alone it is nothing. the methods whereby the agent is itself perfected, and the processes wherein the agent effects the perfecting of the less perfect things, were divided into stages by the alchemists. they generally spoke of these stages as _gates_, and enumerated ten or sometimes twelve of them. as examples of the alchemical description of these gates, i give some extracts from _a brief guide to the celestial ruby_. the first gate is _calcination_, which is "the drying up of the humours"; by this process the substance "is concocted into a black powder which is yet unctuous, and retains its radical humour." when gold passes through this gate, "we observe in it two natures, the fixed and the volatile, which we liken to two serpents." the fixed nature is likened to a serpent without wings; the volatile, to a serpent with wings: calcination unites these two into one. the second gate, _dissolution_, is likened to death and burial; but the true essence will appear glorious and beautiful when this gate is passed. the worker is told not to be discouraged by this apparent death. _the mercury of the sages_ is spoken of by this author as the queen, and gold as the king. the king dies for love of the queen, but he is revived by his spouse, who is made fruitful by him and brings forth "a most royal son." figs. iv. and v. are reduced from _the book of lambspring_; they express the need of the conjunction of two to produce one. [illustration: here you behold a great marvel-- two lions are joined into one. the spirit and soul must be united in their body. fig. iv.] after dissolution came _conjunction_, wherein the separated elements were combined. then followed _putrefaction_, necessary for the germination of the seed which had been produced by calcination, dissolution, and conjunction. putrefaction was followed by _congelation_ and _citation_. the passage through the next gate, called _sublimation_, caused the body to become spiritual, and the spiritual to be made corporal. _fermentation_ followed, whereby the substance became soft and flowed like wax. finally, by _exaltation_, the stone was perfected. [illustration: here are two birds, great and strong--the body and spirit; one devours the other. let the body be placed in horse-dung, or a warm bath, the spirit having been extracted from it. the body has become white by the process, the spirit red by our art. all that exists tends towards perfection, and thus is the philosopher's stone prepared. fig. v.] the author of _the open entrance_ speaks of the various stages in the perfecting of the agent as _regimens_. the beginning of the heating of gold with mercury is likened to the king stripping off his golden garments and descending into the fountain; this is the _regimen of mercury_. as the heating is continued, all becomes black; this is the _regimen of saturn_. then is noticed a play of many colours; this is the _regimen of jupiter_: if the heat is not regulated properly, "the young ones of the crow will go back to the nest." about the end of the fourth month you will see "the sign of the waxing moon," and all becomes white; this is the _regimen of the moon_. the white colour gives place to purple and green; you are now in the _regimen of venus_. after that, appear all the colours of the rainbow, or of a peacock's tail; this is the _regimen of mars_. finally the colour becomes orange and golden; this is the _regimen of the sun_. the reader may wish to have some description of the essence. the alchemists could describe it only in contraries. it had a bodily form, but its method of working was spiritual. in _the sodic hydrolith, or water stone of the wise_ we are told:-- "the stone is conceived below the earth, born in the earth, quickened in heaven, dies in time, and obtains eternal glory.... it is bluish-grey and green.... it flows like water, yet it makes no wet; it is of great weight, and is small." philalethes says, in _a brief guide to the celestial ruby_: "the philosopher's stone is a certain heavenly, spiritual, penetrative, and fixed substance, which brings all metals to the perfection of gold or silver (according to the quality of the medicine), and that by natural methods, which yet in their effects transcend nature.... know then that it is called a stone, not because it is like a stone, but only because, by virtue of its fixed nature, it resists the action of fire as successfully as any stone. in species it is gold, more pure than the purest; it is fixed and incombustible like a stone, but its appearance is that of very fine powder, impalpable to the touch, sweet to the taste, fragrant to the smell, in potency a most penetrative spirit, apparently dry and yet unctuous, and easily capable of tinging a plate of metal.... if we say that its nature is spiritual, it would be no more than the truth; if we described it as corporeal, the expression would be equally correct." the same author says: "there is a substance of a metalline species which looks so cloudy that the universe will have nothing to do with it. its visible form is vile; it defiles metalline bodies, and no one can readily imagine that the pearly drink of bright phoebus should spring from thence. its components are a most pure and tender mercury, a dry incarcerate sulphur, which binds it and restrains fluxation.... know this subject, it is the sure basis of all our secrets.... to deal plainly, it is the child of saturn, of mean price and great venom.... it is not malleable, though metalline. its colour is sable, with intermixed argent which mark the sable fields with veins of glittering argent." in trying to attach definite meanings to the alchemical accounts of principles, elements, and the one thing, and the directions which the alchemists give for changing one substance into others, we are very apt to be misled by the use of such an expression as _the transmutation of the elements_. to a chemist that phrase means the change of an element into another element, an element being a definite substance, which no one has been able to produce by the combination of two or more substances unlike itself, or to separate into two or more substances unlike itself. but whatever may have been the alchemical meaning of the word _element_, it was certainly not that given to the same word to-day. nor did the word _transmutation_ mean to the alchemist what it means to the chemist. the facts which are known at present concerning the elements make unthinkable such a change as that of lead into silver; but new facts _may_ be discovered which will make possible the separation of lead into things unlike itself, and the production of silver by the combination of some of these constituents of lead. the alchemist supposed he knew such facts as enabled him not only to form a mental picture of the change of lead into silver, or tin into gold, but also to assert that such changes must necessarily happen, and to accomplish them. although we are quite sure that the alchemist's facts were only imaginings, we ought not to blame him for his reasoning on what he took to be facts. every metal is now said to be an element, in the modern meaning of that word: the alchemist regarded the metals as composite substances; but he also thought of them as more simple than many other things. hence, if he was able to transmute one metal into another, he would have strong evidence in support of his general conception of the unity of all things. and, as transmutation meant, to the alchemist, the bringing of a substance to the condition of greatest perfection possible for that substance, his view of the unity of nature might be said to be proved if he succeeded in changing one of the metals, one of these comparatively simple substances, into the most perfect of all metals, that is, into gold. the transmutation of the baser metals into gold thus came to be the practical test of the justness of the alchemical scheme of things. some alchemists assert they had themselves performed the great transmutation; others tell of people who had accomplished the work. the following story is an example of the accounts given of the making of gold. it is taken from _john frederick helvetius' golden calf, which the world worships and adores_ ( th century):-- "on the th december , in the forenoon, there came to my house a certain man, who was a complete stranger to me, but of an honest grave countenance, and an authoritative mien, clothed in a simple garb.... he was of middle height, his face was long and slightly pock-marked, his hair was black and straight, his chin close-shaven, his age about forty-three or forty-four, and his native province, as far as i could make out, north holland. after we had exchanged salutations, he asked me whether he might have some conversation with me. he wished to say something to me about the pyrotechnic art, as he had read one of my tracts (directed against the sympathetic powder of dr digby), in which i hinted a suspicion whether the grand arcanum of the sages was not after all a gigantic hoax. he, therefore, took that opportunity of asking me whether i could not believe that such a grand mystery might exist in the nature of things, by means of which a physician could restore any patient whose vitals were not irreparably destroyed. i answered, 'such a medicine would be a most desirable acquisition for any physician; nor can any man tell how many secrets there may be hidden in nature; yet, though i have read much about the truth of this art, it has never been my good fortune to meet with a real master of the alchemical science.' ... after some further conversation, the artist elias (for it was he) thus addressed me: 'since you have read so much in the works of the alchemists about this stone, its substance, its colour and its wonderful effects, may i be allowed the question, whether you have not prepared it yourself?' on my answering his question in the negative, he took out of his bag a cunningly-worked ivory box, in which were three large pieces of substance resembling glass, or pale sulphur, and informed me that here was enough of the tincture for the production of twenty tons of gold. when i had held the precious treasure in my hand for a quarter of an hour (during which time i listened to a recital of its wonderful curative properties), i was compelled to restore it to its owner, which i could not help doing with a certain degree of reluctance.... my request that he would give me a piece of his stone (though it were no larger than a coriander seed), he somewhat brusquely refused, adding, in a milder tone, that he could not give it me for all the wealth i possessed, and that not on account of its great preciousness, but for some other reason which it was not lawful for him to divulge.... then he inquired whether i could not show him into a room at the back of the house, where we should be less liable to the observation of passers-by. on my conducting him into the state parlour (which he entered without wiping his dirty boots), he demanded of me a gold coin, and while i was looking for it, he produced from his breast pocket a green silk handkerchief, in which were folded up five medals, the gold of which was infinitely superior to that of my gold piece." here follows the inscriptions on the medals. "i was filled with admiration, and asked my visitor whence he had obtained that wonderful knowledge of the whole world. he replied that it was a gift freely bestowed on him by a friend who had stayed a few days at his house." here follows the stranger's account of this friend's experiments. "when my strange visitor had concluded his narrative, i besought him to give me a proof of his assertion, by performing the transmutatory operation on some metals in my presence. he answered evasively, that he could not do so then, but that he would return in three weeks, and that, if he was then at liberty to do so, he would show me something that would make me open my eyes. he appeared punctually to the promised day, and invited me to take a walk with him, in the course of which we discoursed profoundly on the secrets of nature in fire, though i noticed that my companion was very chary in imparting information about the grand arcanum.... at last i asked him point blank to show me the transmutation of metals. i besought him to come and dine with me, and to spend the night at my house; i entreated; i expostulated; but in vain. he remained firm. i reminded him of his promise. he retorted that his promise had been conditional upon his being permitted to reveal the secret to me. at last, however, i prevailed upon him to give me a piece of his precious stone--a piece no larger than a grain of rape seed.... he bid me take half an ounce of lead ... and melt it in the crucible; for the medicine would certainly not tinge more of the base metal than it was sufficient for.... he promised to return at nine o'clock the next morning.... but at the stated hour on the following day he did not make his appearance; in his stead, however, there came, a few hours later, a stranger, who told me that his friend the artist was unavoidably detained, but that he would call at three o'clock in the afternoon. the afternoon came; i waited for him till half-past seven o'clock. he did not appear. thereupon my wife came and tempted me to try the transmutation myself. i determined however to wait till the morrow. on the morrow ... i asked my wife to put the tincture in wax, and i myself ... prepared six drachms of lead; i then cast the tincture, enveloped as it was in wax, on the lead; as soon as it was melted, there was a hissing sound and a slight effervescence, and after a quarter of an hour i found that the whole mass of lead had been turned into the finest gold.... we immediately took it to the goldsmith, who at once declared it the finest gold he had ever seen, and offered to pay fifty florins an ounce for it." he then describes various tests which were made to prove the purity of the gold. "thus i have unfolded to you the whole story from beginning to end. the gold i still retain in my possession, but i cannot tell you what has become of the artist elias." chapter vi. alchemy as an experimental art. a modern writer, mr a.e. waite, in his _lives of the alchemystical philosophers_, says: "the physical theory of transmutation is based on the composite character of the metals, on their generation in the bowels of the earth, and on the existence in nature of a pure and penetrating matter which applied to any substance exalts and perfects it after its own kind." it must he admitted that the alchemists could cite many instances of transmutations which seemed to lead to the conclusion, that there is no difference of kind between the metals and other substances such as water, acids, oils, resins, and wood. we are able to-day to effect a vast number of transformations wherein one substance is exchanged for another, or made to take the place of another. we can give fairly satisfactory descriptions of these changes; and, by comparing them one with another, we are able to express their essential features in general terms which can be applied to each particular instance. the alchemists had no searching knowledge of what may be called the mechanism of such changes; they gave an explanation of them which we must call incorrect, in the present state of our knowledge. but, as hoefer says in his _histoire de la chimie_, "to jeer at [the alchemical] theory is to commit at once an anachronism and an injustice.... unless the world should finish to-morrow, no one can have the pretension to suppose that our contemporaries have said the last word of science, and nothing will remain for our descendants to discover, no errors for them to correct, no theories for them to set straight." [illustration: fig. vi. _see p. ._] [illustration: fig. vii. _see p. ._] [illustration: fig. viii. _see p. ._] what kind of experimental evidence could an alchemist furnish in support of his theory of transmutation? in answering this question, i cannot do better than give a condensed rendering of certain pages in hoefer's _histoire de la chimie_. the reader is supposed to be present at experiments conducted in the laboratory of a grand master of the sacred art in the th or th century. _experiment_.--ordinary water is boiled in an open vessel; the water is changed to a vapour which disappears, and a white powdery earth remains in the vessel. _conclusion_.--water is changed into air and earth. did we not know that ordinary water holds certain substances in solution, and that boiling water acts on the vessel wherein it is boiled, we should have no objection to urge against this conclusion. it only remained to transmute fire that the transmutation of the four elements might be completed. _experiment._--a piece of red-hot iron is placed in a bell-jar, filled with water, held over a basin containing water; the volume of the water decreases, and the air in the bell-jar takes fire when a lighted taper is brought into it. _conclusion._--water is changed into fire. that interpretation was perfectly reasonable at a time when the fact was unknown that water is composed of two gaseous substances; that one of these (oxygen) is absorbed by the iron, and the other (hydrogen) collects in the bell-jar, and ignites when brought into contact with a flame. _experiment_.--lead, or any other metal except gold or silver, is calcined in the air; the metal loses its characteristic properties, and is changed into a powdery substance, a kind of cinder or calx. when this cinder, which was said to be the result of the _death of the metal_, is heated in a crucible with some grains of wheat, one sees the metal revive, and resume its original form and properties. _conclusion._--the metal which had been destroyed is revivified by the grains of wheat and the action of fire. is this not to perform the miracle of the resurrection? no objection can he raised to this interpretation, as long as we are ignorant of the phenomena of oxidation, and the reduction of oxides by means of carbon, or organic substances rich in carbon, such as sugar, flour, seeds, etc. grains of wheat were the symbol of life, and, by extension, of the resurrection and eternal life. [illustration: fig. ix. _see p. ._] _experiment_.--ordinary lead is calcined in a cupel made of cinders or powdered bones; the lead is changed to a cinder which disappears into the cupel, and a button of silver remains. _conclusion_.--the lead has vanished; what more natural than the conclusion that it has been transformed into silver? it was not known then that all specimens of lead contain more or less silver. [illustration: fig. x. _see p. ._] _experiment._-the vapour of arsenic bleaches copper. this fact gave rise to many allegories and enigmas concerning the means of transforming copper into silver. sulphur, which acts on metals and changes many of them into black substances, was looked on as a very mysterious thing. it was with sulphur that the coagulation (solidification) of mercury was effected. _experiment_.--mercury is allowed to fall, in a fine rain, on to melted sulphur; a black substance is produced; this black substance is heated in a closed vessel, it is volatilised and transformed into a beautiful red solid. one could scarcely suppose that the black and the red substances are identical, if one did not know that they are composed of the same quantities of the same elements, sulphur and mercury. how greatly must this phenomenon have affected the imagination of the chemists of ancient times, always so ready to be affected by everything that seemed supernatural! black and red were the symbols of darkness and light, of the evil and the good principle; and the union of these two principles represented the moral order. at a later time the idea helped to establish the alchemical doctrine that sulphur and mercury are the principles of all things. _experiment._--various organic substances are analysed by heating in a distillation-apparatus; the products are, in each case, a solid residue, liquids which distil off, and certain spirits which are disengaged. the results supported the ancient theory which asserted that _earth_, _water_, _air_, and _fire_ are the four elements of the world. the solid residue represented _earth_; the liquid products of the distillation, _water_; and the spirituous substances, _air_. _fire_ was regarded sometimes as the means of purification, sometimes as the soul, or invisible part, of all substances. _experiment_.-a strong acid is poured on to copper. the metal is attacked, and at last disappears, giving place to a green liquid, as transparent as water. a thin sheet of iron is plunged into the liquid; the copper re-appears, and the iron vanishes. what more simple than to conclude that the iron has been transformed into copper? had lead, silver, or gold been used in place of copper, one would have said that the iron was transformed into lead, silver, or gold. in their search for "the pure and penetrating matter which applied to any substance exalts and perfects it after its own kind," the alchemists necessarily made many inventions, laid the foundation of many arts and manufactures, and discovered many facts of importance in the science of chemistry. the practitioners of the _sacred art_ of egypt must have been acquainted with many operations which we now class as belonging to applied chemistry; witness, their jewellery, pottery, dyes and pigments, bleaching, glass-making, working in metals and alloys, and their use of spices, essential oils, and soda in embalming, and for other purposes. during the centuries when alchemy flourished, gunpowder was invented, the art of printing was established, the compass was brought into use, the art of painting and staining glass was begun and carried to perfection, paper was made from rags, practical metallurgy advanced by leaps and bounds, many new alloys of metals came into use, glass mirrors were manufactured, and considerable advances were made in practical medicine and sanitation. [illustration: fig. xi. _see p. ._] basil valentine, who was one of the greatest alchemists of the th century, discovered many of the properties of the metal antimony, and prepared and examined many compounds of that metal; he made green vitriol from pyrites, brandy from fermented grape-juice, fulminating gold, sulphide of potash, and spirits of salt; he made and used baths of artificial mineral waters, and he prepared various metals by what are now called _wet methods_, for instance, copper, by immersing plates of iron in solutions of bluestone. he examined the air of mines, and suggested practical methods for determining whether the air in a mine was respirable. hoefer draws attention to a remarkable observation recorded by this alchemist. speaking of the "spirit of mercury," basil valentine says it is "the origin of all the metals; that spirit is nothing else than an air flying here and there without wings; it is a moving wind, which, after it has been chased from its home of vulcan (that is, fire), returns to the chaos; then it expands and passes into the region of the air from whence it had come." as hoefer remarks, this is perhaps one of the earliest accounts of the gas discovered by priestley and studied by lavoisier, the gas we now call oxygen, and recognise as of paramount importance in chemical reactions. [illustration: fig. xii. _see p. ._] besides discovering and recording many facts which have become part and parcel of the science of chemistry, the alchemists invented and used various pieces of apparatus, and conducted many operations, which are still employed in chemical laboratories. i shall reproduce illustrations of some of these processes and pieces of apparatus, and quote a few of the directions, given in a book, published in , called _the art of distillation_, by john french, dr. in physick. the method recommended by french for hermetically sealing the neck of a glass vessel is shown in fig. vi. p. . the neck of the vessel is surrounded by a tray containing burning coals; when the glass melts it is cut off by shears, and then closed by tongs, which are made hot before use. fig. vii. p. , represents a method for covering an open vessel, air-tight, with a receptacle into which a substance may be sublimed from the lower vessel. the lettering explains the method of using the apparatus. french gives very practical directions and much sound advice for conducting distillations of various kinds. the following are specimens of his directions and advice:-- "when you put water into a seething balneum wherein there are glasses let it be hot, or else thou wilt endanger the breaking of the glasses. "when thou takest any earthen, or glass vessel from the fire, expose it not to the cold aire too suddenly for fear it should break. "in all your operations diligently observe the processes which you read, and vary not a little from them, for sometimes a small mistake or neglect spoils the whole operation, and frustrates your expectations. "try not at first experiments of great cost, or great difficulty; for it will be a great discouragement to thee, and thou wilt be very apt to mistake. "if any one would enter upon the practices of chymistry, let him apply himself to some expert artist for to be instructed in the manual operation of things; for by this means he will learn more in two months, than he can by his practice and study in seven years, as also avoid much pains and cost, and redeem much time which else of necessity he will lose." fig. viii. p. , represents a common cold still, and fig. ix. p. , is a sketch of an apparatus for distilling by the aid of boiling water. the bath wherein the vessels are placed in fig. ix. was called by the alchemists _balneum mariae_, from mary the jewess, who is mentioned in the older alchemical writings, and is supposed to have invented an apparatus of this character. nothing definite is known of mary the jewess. a writer of the th century says she was initiated in the sacred art in the temple of memphis; a legend prevailed among some of the alchemists that she was the sister of moses. fig. x. p. , represents methods of distilling with an apparatus for cooling the volatile products; the lower vessel is an _alembic_, with a long neck, the upper part of which passes through a vessel containing cold water. [illustration: fig xiii. _see p. ._] fig. xi. p. , shows a _pelican_, that is a vessel wherein a liquid might be heated for a long time, and the volatile products be constantly returned to the original vessel. fig. xii. p. , represents a retort with a receiver. some of the pieces of apparatus for distilling, which are described by french, are shown in the following figures. besides describing apparatus for distilling, subliming, and other processes in the laboratory, french gives directions for making tinctures, essences, essential oils, spirits of salt, and pure saltpetre, oil of vitriol, butter of antimony, calces (or as we now say, oxides) of metals, and many other substances. he describes processes for making fresh water from salt, artificial mineral water, medicated hot baths for invalids (one of the figures represents an apparatus very like those advertised to-day as "turkish baths at home"), and artificial precious stones; he tells how to test minerals, and make alloys, and describes the preparation of many substances made from gold and silver. he also gives many curious receipts; for instance, "to make firre-trees appear in turpentine," "to make a plant grow in two or three hours," "to make the representation of the whole world in a glass," "to extract a white milkie substance from the raies of the moon." [illustration: fig. xiv. _see p. ._] the process of making oil of vitriol, by burning sulphur under a hood fitted with a side tube for the outflow of the oil of vitriol, is represented in fig. xiii. p. . fig. xiv. p. , is interesting; it is an apparatus for rectifying spirits, by distilling, and liquefying only the most volatile portions of the distillate. the spirituous liquor was heated, and the vapours caused to traverse a long zigzag tube, wherein the less volatile portions condensed to liquid, which flowed back into the vessel; the vapour then passed into another vessel, and then through a second zigzag tube, and was finally cooled by water, and the condensed liquid collected. this apparatus was the forerunner of that used to-day, for effecting the separation of liquids which boil at different temperatures, by the process called _fractional distillation_. we should never forget that the alchemists were patient and laborious workers, their theories were vitally connected with their practice, and there was a constant action and reaction between their general scheme of things and many branches of what we now call chemical manufactures. we may laugh at many of their theories, and regret that much useless material was accumulated by them; we may agree with boyle (end of th century) when he likens the "hermetick philosophers," in their search for truth, to "the navigators of solomon's tarshish fleet, who brought home from their long and tedious voyages, not only gold, and silver, and ivory, but apes and peacocks too; for so the writings of several of your hermetick philosophers present us, together with divers substantial and noble experiments, theories, which either like peacocks' feathers make a great show but are neither solid nor useful; or else like apes, if they have some appearance of being rational, are blemished with some absurdity or other, that, when they are attentively considered make them appear ridiculous." but however we may condemn their method, because it rested on their own conception of what the order of nature must be, we cannot but praise their assiduity in conducting experiments and gathering facts. as bacon says, in _de augmentis scientiarum_: "alchemy may be compared to the man who told his sons that he had left them gold buried somewhere in his vineyard; where they by digging found no gold, but by turning up the mould about the roots of the vines, procured a plentiful vintage. so the search and endeavours to make gold have brought many useful inventions and instructive experiments to light." chapter vii. the language of alchemy the vagueness of the general conceptions of alchemy, and the attribution of ethical qualities to material things by the alchemists, necessarily led to the employment of a language which is inexact, undescriptive, and unsuggestive to modern ears. the same name was given to different things, and the same thing went under many names. in chapter iv. i endeavoured to analyse two terms which were constantly used by the alchemists to convey ideas of great importance, the terms _element_ and _principle_. that attempt sufficed, at any rate, to show the vagueness of the ideas which these terms were intended to express, and to make evident the inconsistencies between the meanings given to the words by different alchemical writers. the story quoted in chapter iii., from michael sendivogius, illustrates the difficulty which the alchemists themselves had in understanding what they meant by the term _mercury_; yet there is perhaps no word more often used by them than that. some of them evidently took it to mean the substance then, and now, called mercury; the results of this literal interpretation were disastrous; others thought of mercury as a substance which could be obtained, or, at any rate, might be obtained, by repeatedly distilling ordinary mercury, both alone and when mixed with other substances; others used the word to mean a hypothetical something which was liquid but did not wet things, limpid yet capable of becoming solid, volatile yet able to prevent the volatilisation of other things, and white, yet ready to cause other white things to change their colour; they thought of this something, this soul of mercury, as having properties without itself being tangible, as at once a substance and not a substance, at once a bodily spirit and a spiritual body. it was impossible to express the alchemical ideas in any language save that of far-fetched allegory. the alchemical writings abound in such allegories. here are two of them. the first allegory is taken from _the twelve keys_, of basilius valentinus, the benedictine:-- "the eleventh key to the knowledge of the augmentation of our stone i will put before you in the form of a parable. "there lived in the east a gilded knight, named orpheus, who was possessed of immense wealth, and had everything that heart can wish. he had taken to wife his own sister, euridice, who did not, however, bear him any children. this he regarded as the punishment of his sin in having wedded his own sister, and was instant in prayer to god both by day and by night, that the curse might be taken from him. one night when he was buried in a deep sleep, there came to him a certain winged messenger, named phoebus, who touched his feet, which were very hot, and said: 'thou noble knight, since thou hast wandered through many cities and kingdoms and suffered many things at sea, in battle, and in the lists, the heavenly father has bidden me make known to thee the following means of obtaining thy prayer: take blood from thy right side, and from the left side of thy spouse. for this blood is the heart's blood of your parents, and though it may seem to be of two kinds, yet, in reality, it is only one. mix the two kinds of blood, and keep the mixture tightly enclosed in the globe of the seven wise masters. then that which is generated will be nourished with its own flesh and blood, and will complete its course of development when the moon has changed for the eighth time. if thou repeat this process again and again, thou shalt see children's children, and the offspring of thy body shall fill the world.' when phoebus had thus spoken, he winged his flight heavenward. in the morning the knight arose and did the bidding of the celestial messenger, and god gave to him and to his wife many children, who inherited their father's glory, wealth, and knightly honours from generation to generation." in the "dedicatory epistle" to his _triumphal chariot of antimony_, basil valentine addresses his brother alchemists as follows:-- "mercury appeared to me in a dream, and brought me back from my devious courses to the one way. 'behold me clad not in the garb of the vulgar, but in the philosopher's mantle.' so he said, and straightway began to leap along the road in headlong bounds. then, when he was tired, he sat down, and, turning to me, who had followed him in the spirit, bade me mark that he no longer possessed that youthful vigour with which he would at the first have overcome every obstacle, if he had not been allowed a free course. encouraged by his friendly salutation, i addressed him in the following terms: 'mercury, eloquent scion of atlas, and father of all alchemists, since thou hast guided me hitherto, shew me, i pray thee, the way to those blessed isles, which thou hast promised to reveal to all thine elect children. 'dost thou remember,' he replied, that when i quitted thy laboratory, i left behind me a garment so thoroughly saturated with my own blood, that neither the wind could efface it, nor all-devouring time destroy its indelible essence? fetch it hither to me, that i may not catch a chill from the state of perspiration in which i now am; but let me clothe myself warmly in it, and be closely incited thereto, so that i may safely reach my bride, who is sick with love. she has meekly borne many wrongs, being driven through water and fire, and compelled to ascend and descend times without number--yet has she been carried through it all by the hope of entering with me the bridal chamber, wherein we expect to beget a son adorned from his birth with the royal crown which he may not share with others. yet may he bring his friends to the palace, where sits enthroned the king of kings, who communicates his dignity readily and liberally to all that approach him.' "i brought him the garment, and it fitted him so closely, that it looked like an iron skin securing him against all the assaults of vulcan. 'let us proceed,' he then said, and straightway sped across the open field, while i boldly strove to keep up with my guide. "thus we reached his bride, whose virtue and constancy were equal to his own. there i beheld their marvellous conjugal union and nuptial consummation, whence was born the son crowned with the royal diadem. when i was about to salute him as king of kings and lord of lords, my genius stood by me and warned me not to be deceived, since this was only the king's forerunner, but not the king himself whom i sought. "when i heard the admonition, i did not know whether to be sad or joyful. 'depart,' then said mercury, 'with this bridal gift, and when you come to those disciples who have seen the lord himself, show them this sign.' and therewith he gave me a gold ring from his son's finger. 'they know the golden branch which must be consecrated to proserpina before you can enter the palace of pluto. when he sees this ring, perhaps one will open to you with a word the door of that chamber, where sits enthroned in his magnificence the desire of all nations, who is known only to the sages.' "when he had thus spoken, the vision vanished, but the bridal gift which i still held in my hand shewed me that it had not been a mere dream. it was of gold, but to me more precious than the most prized of all metals. unto you i will shew it when i am permitted to see your faces, and to converse with you freely. till that earnestly wished-for time, i bid you farewell." one result of the alchemical modes of expression was, that he who tried to follow the directions given in alchemical books got into dire confusion. he did not know what substances to use in his operations; for when he was told to employ "the homogeneous water of gold," for example, the expression might mean anything, and in despair he distilled, and calcined, and cohobated, and tried to decompose everything he could lay hands on. those who pretended to know abused and vilified those who differed from them. in _a demonstration of nature_, by john a. mehung ( th century), nature addresses the alchemical worker in the following words:-- "you break vials, and consume coals, only to soften your brains still more with the vapours. you also digest alum, salt, orpiment, and altrament; you melt metals, build small and large furnaces, and use many vessels; nevertheless i am sick of your folly, and you suffocate me with your sulphurous smoke.... you would do better to mind your own business, than to dissolve and distil so many absurd substances, and then to pass them through alembics, cucurbits, stills, and pelicans." henry madathanas, writing in , says:-- "then i understood that their purgations, sublimations, cementations, distillations, rectifications, circulations, putrefactions, conjunctions, calcinations, incinerations, mortifications, revivifications, as also their tripods, athanors, reverberatory alembics, excrements of horses, ashes, sand, stills, pelican-viols, retorts, fixations, etc., are mere plausible impostures and frauds." the author of _the only way_ ( ) says: "surely every true artist must look on this elaborate tissue of baseless operations as the merest folly, and can only wonder that the eyes of those silly dupes are not at last opened, that they may see something besides such absurd sophisms, and read something besides those stupid and deceitful books.... i can speak from bitter experience, for i, too, toiled for many years ... and endeavoured to reach the coveted goal by sublimation, distillation, calcination, circulation, and so forth, and to fashion the stone out of substances such as urine, salt, atrament, alum, etc. i have tried hard to evolve it out of hairs, wine, eggs, bones, and all manner of herbs; out of arsenic, mercury, and sulphur, and all the minerals and metals.... i have spent nights and days in dissolving, coagulating, amalgamating, and precipitating. yet from all these things i derived neither profit nor joy." another writer speaks of many would-be alchemists as "floundering about in a sea of specious book-learning." if alchemists could speak of their own processes and materials as those authors spoke whom i have quoted, we must expect that the alchemical language would appear mere jargon to the uninitiated. in ben jonson's play _the alchemist_, _surley_, who is the sceptic of the piece, says to subtle, who is the alchemist-- ... alchemy is a pretty kind of game, somewhat like tricks o' the cards, to cheat a man with charming ... what else are all your terms, whereon no one of your writers 'grees with other? of your elixir, your _lac virginis_, your stone, your med'cine, and your chrysosperme, your sal, your sulphur, and your mercury, your oil of height, your tree of life, your blood, your marchesite, your tutie, your magnesia, your toad, your crow, your dragon, and your panther; your sun, your moon, your firmament, your adrop, your lato, azoch, zernich, chibrit, heutarit, and then your red man, and your white woman, with all your broths, your menstrues, and materials, of lye and egg-shells, women's terms, man's blood, hair o' the head, burnt clout, chalk, merds, and clay, powder of bones, scalings of iron, glass, and moulds of other strange ingredients, would burst a man to name? to which _subtle_ answers, and all these named intending but one thing; which art our writers used to obscure their art. was not all the knowledge of the egyptians writ in mystic symbols? speak not the scriptures oft in parables? are not the choicest fables of the poets, that were the fountains and first springs of wisdom, wrapp'd in perplexed allegories? the alchemists were very fond of using the names of animals as symbols of certain mineral substances, and of representing operations in the laboratory by what may be called animal allegories. the _yellow lion_ was the alchemical symbol of yellow sulphides, the _red lion_ was synonymous with cinnabar, and the _green lion_ meant salts of iron and of copper. black sulphides were called _eagles_, and sometimes _crows_. when black sulphide of mercury is strongly heated, a red sublimate is obtained, which has the same composition as the black compound; if the temperature is not kept very high, but little of the red sulphide is produced; the alchemists directed to urge the fire, "else the black crows will go back to the nest." [illustration: a salamander lives in the fire, which imparts to it a most glorious hue. this is the reiteration, gradation, and amelioration of the tincture, or philosopher's stone; and the whole is called its augmentation. fig. xv.] the salamander was called the king of animals, because it was supposed that he lived and delighted in fire; keeping a strong fire alight under a salamander was sometimes compared to the purification of gold by heating it. fig. xv., reduced from _the book of lambspring_ represents this process. the alchemists employed many signs, or shorthand expressions, in place of writing the names of substances. the following are a few of the signs which were used frequently. [symbol: saturn] saturn, also lead; [symbol: jupiter] jupiter, also tin; [symbol: mars- ] and [symbol: mars- ] mars, also iron; [symbol: sun] sol, also gold; [symbol: venus] venus, also copper; [symbol: mercury- ], [symbol: mercury- ] and [symbol: mercury- ] mercury; [symbol: moon] luna, also silver; [symbol: sulphur] sulphur; [symbol: vitriol] vitriol; [symbol: fire] fire; [symbol: air] air; [symbol: water] and [symbol: aquarius] water; [symbol: earth] earth; [symbol: aqua fortis] aqua fortis; [symbol: aqua regis] aqua regis; [symbol: aqua vitæ] aqua vitæ; [symbol: day] day; [symbol: night] night; [symbol: amalgam] amalgam; [symbol: alembic] alembic. chapter viii. the degeneracy of alchemy. i have tried to show that alchemy aimed at giving experimental proof of a certain theory of the whole system of nature, including humanity. the practical culmination of the alchemical quest presented a threefold aspect; the alchemists sought the stone of wisdom, for by gaining that they gained the control of wealth; they sought the universal panacea, for that would give them the power of enjoying wealth and life; they sought the soul of the world, for thereby they could hold communion with spiritual existences, and enjoy the fruition of spiritual life. the object of their search was to satisfy their material needs, their intellectual capacities, and their spiritual yearnings. the alchemists of the nobler sort always made the first of these objects subsidiary to the other two; they gave as their reason for desiring to make gold, the hope that gold might become so common that it would cease to be sought after by mankind. the author of _an open substance_ says: "would to god ... all men might become adepts in our art, for then gold, the common idol of mankind, would lose its value, and we should prize it only for its scientific teaching." but the desire to make gold must always have been a very powerful incentive in determining men to attempt the laborious discipline of alchemy; and with them, as with all men, the love of money was the root of much evil. when a man became a student of alchemy merely for the purpose of making gold, and failed to make it--as he always did--it was very easy for him to pretend he had succeeded in order that he might really make gold by cheating other people. such a man rapidly degenerated into a charlatan; he used the language of alchemy to cover his frauds, and with the hope of deluding his dupes by high-sounding phrases. and, it must be admitted, alchemy lent itself admirably to imposture. it promised unlimited wealth; it encouraged the wildest dreams of the seeker after pleasure; and over these dreams it cast the glamour of great ideas, the idea of the unity of nature, and the idea of communion with other spheres of life, of calling in the help of 'inheritors of unfulfilled renown,' and so it seemed to touch to fine issues the sordidness of unblushing avarice. moreover, the working with strange ingredients and odd-fashioned instruments, and the employment of mouth-filling phrases, and scraps of occult learning which seemed to imply unutterable things, gave just that pleasing dash of would-be wickedness to the process of consulting the alchemist which acts as a fascination to many people. the earnest person felt that by using the skill and knowledge of the alchemists, for what he deemed a good purpose, he was compelling the powers of evil to work for him and his objects. it was impossible that such a system as alchemy should appear to the plain man of the middle ages, when the whole scheme of life and the universe rested on a magical basis, to be more than a kind of magic which hovered between the black magic of the sorcerer and the white magic of the church. nor is it to be wondered at that a system which lends itself to imposture so easily as alchemy did, should be thought of by the plain man of modern times as having been nothing but a machinery of fraud. it is evident from the _canon's yeoman's tale_ in chaucer, that many of those who professed to turn the base metals into gold were held in bad repute as early as the th century. the "false chanoun" persuaded the priest, who was his dupe, to send his servant for quicksilver, which he promised to make into "as good silver and as fyn, as ther is any in youre purse or myn"; he then gave the priest a "crosselet," and bid him put it on the fire, and blow the coals. while the priest was busy with the fire, this false chanoun--the foulè feend hym fecche!-- out of his bosom took a bechen cole, in which ful subtilly was maad an hole, and therinne put was of silver lemaille an ounce, and stoppéd was withouten faille the hole with wex, to kepe the lemaille in. the "false chanoun" pretended to be sorry for the priest, who was so busily blowing the fire:-- ye been right hoot, i se wel how ye swete; have heer a clooth, and wipe awey the we't. and whylès that the preest wipèd his face, this chanoun took his cole with hardè grace, and leyde it above, upon the middèward of the crosselet, and blew wel afterward. til that the colès gonnè fastè brenne. as the coal burned the silver fell into the "crosselet." then the canon said they would both go together and fetch chalk, and a pail of water, for he would pour out the silver he had made in the form of an ingot. they locked the door, and took the key with them. on returning, the canon formed the chalk into a mould, and poured the contents of the crucible into it. then he bade the priest, look what ther is, put in thin hand and grope, thow fyndè shalt ther silver, as i hope. what, devel of hellè! sholde it ellis be? shavyng of silver silver is, _parde!_ he putte his hand in, and took up a teyne of silver fyn, and glad in every veyne was this preest, when he saugh that it was so. the conclusion of the _canon's yeoman's tale_ shows that, in the th century, there was a general belief in the possibility of finding the philosopher's stone, and effecting the transmutation, although the common practitioners of the art were regarded as deceivers. a disciple of plato is supposed to ask his master to tell him the "namè of the privee stoon." plato gives him certain directions, and tells him he must use _magnasia_; the disciple asks-- 'what is magnasia, good sire, i yow preye?' 'it is a water that is maad, i seye, of elementés fourè,' quod plato. 'telle me the rootè, good sire,' quod he tho, of that water, if it be yourè wille.' 'nay, nay,' quod plato, 'certein that i nylle; the philosophres sworn were everychoon that they sholden discovers it unto noon, ne in no book it write in no manere, for unto crist it is so lief and deere, that he wol nat that it discovered bee, but where it liketh to his deitee man for tenspire, and eek for to deffende whom that hym liketh; lo, this is the ende.' the belief in the possibility of alchemy seems to have been general sometime before chaucer wrote; but that belief was accompanied by the conviction that alchemy was an impious pursuit, because the transmutation of baser metals into gold was regarded as trenching on the prerogative of the creator, to whom alone this power rightfully belonged. in his _inferno_ (which was probably written about the year ), dante places the alchemists in the eighth circle of hell, not apparently because they were fraudulent impostors, but because, as one of them says, "i aped creative nature by my subtle art." in later times, some of those who pretended to have the secret and to perform great wonders by the use of it, became rich and celebrated, and were much sought after. the most distinguished of these pseudo-alchemists was he who passed under the name of cagliostro. his life bears witness to the eagerness of human beings to be deceived. joseph balsamo was born in at palermo, where his parents were tradespeople in a good way of business.[ ] in the memoir of himself, which he wrote in prison, balsamo seeks to surround his birth and parentage with mystery; he says, "i am ignorant, not only of my birthplace, but even of the parents who bore me.... my earliest infancy was passed in the town of medina, in arabia, where i was brought up under the name of acharat." [ ] the account of the life of cagliostro is much condensed from mr a.e. waite's _lives of the alchemystical philosophers_. when he was thirteen years of age, balsamo's parents determined he should be trained for the priesthood, but he ran away from his school. he was then confined in a benedictine monastery. he showed a remarkable taste for natural history, and acquired considerable knowledge of the use of drugs; but he soon tired of the discipline and escaped. for some years he wandered about in different parts of italy, living by his wits and by cheating. a goldsmith consulted him about a hidden treasure; he pretended to invoke the aid of spirits, frightened the goldsmith, got sixty ounces of gold from him to carry on his incantations, left him in the lurch, and fled to messina. in that town he discovered an aged aunt who was sick; the aunt died, and left her money to the church. balsamo assumed her family name, added a title of nobility, and was known henceforward as the count alessandro cagliostro. in messina he met a mysterious person whom he calls altotas, and from whom, he says in his memoir, he learnt much. the following account of the meeting of balsamo and the stranger is taken from waite's book: "as he was promenading one day near the jetty at the extremity of the port he encountered an individual singularly habited and possessed of a most remarkable countenance. this person, aged apparently about fifty years, seemed to be an armenian, though, according to other accounts, he was a spaniard or greek. he wore a species of caftan, a silk bonnet, and the extremities of his breeches were concealed in a pair of wide boots. in his left hand he held a parasol, and in his right the end of a cord, to which was attached a graceful albanian greyhound.... cagliostro saluted this grotesque being, who bowed slightly, but with satisfied dignity. 'you do not reside in messina, signor?' he said in sicilian, but with a marked foreign accent. cagliostro replied that he was tarrying for a few days, and they began to converse on the beauty of the town and on its advantageous situation, a kind of oriental imagery individualising the eloquence of the stranger, whose remarks were, moreover, adroitly adorned with a few appropriate compliments." although the stranger said he received no one at his house he allowed cagliostro to visit him. after various mysterious doings the two went off to egypt, and afterwards to malta, where they performed many wonderful deeds before the grand master, who was much impressed. at malta altotas died, or, at anyrate, vanished. cagliostro then travelled for some time, and was well received by noblemen, ambassadors, and others in high position. at rome he fell in love with a young and beautiful lady, lorenza feliciani, and married her. cagliostro used his young wife as a decoy to attract rich and foolish men. he and his wife thrived for a time, and accumulated money and jewels; but a confederate betrayed them, and they fled to venice, and then wandered for several years in italy, france, and england. they seem to have made a living by the sale of lotions for the skin, and by practising skilful deceptions. about the year cagliostro began to pose as an alchemist. after another period of wandering he paid a second visit to london and founded a secret society, based on (supposed) egyptian rites, mingled with those of freemasonry. the suggestion of this society is said to have come from a curious book he picked up on a second-hand stall in london. the society attracted people by the strangeness of its initiatory rites, and the promises of happiness and wellbeing made by its founder to those who joined it. lodges were established in many countries, many disciples were obtained, great riches were amassed, and cagliostro flourished exceedingly. in his _histoire du merveilleux dans les temps modernes_, figuier, speaking of cagliostro about this period of his career, says: "he proclaimed himself the bearer of the mysteries of isis and anubis from the far east.... he obtained numerous and distinguished followers, who on one occasion assembled in great force to hear joseph balsamo expound to them the doctrines of egyptian freemasonry. at this solemn convention he is said to have spoken with overpowering eloquence;... his audience departed in amazement and completely converted to the regenerated and purified masonry. none doubted that he was an initiate of the arcana of nature, as preserved in the temple of apis at the era when cambyses belaboured that capricious divinity. from this moment the initiations into the new masonry were numerous, albeit they were limited to the aristocracy of society. there are reasons to believe that the grandees who were deemed worthy of admission paid exceedingly extravagantly for the honour." cagliostro posed as a physician, and claimed the power of curing diseases simply by the laying on of hands. he went so far as to assert he had restored to life the dead child of a nobleman in paris; the discovery that the miracle was effected by substituting a living child for the dead one caused him to flee, laden with spoil, to warsaw, and then to strassburg. cagliostro entered strassburg in state, amid an admiring crowd, who regarded him as more than human. rumour said he had amassed vast riches by the transmutation of base metals into gold. some people in the crowd said he was the wandering jew, others that he had been present at the marriage feast of cana, some asserted he was born before the deluge, and one supposed he might be the devil. the goldsmith whom he had cheated of sixty ounces of gold many years before was in the crowd, and, recognising him, tried to stop the carriage, shouting: "joseph balsamo! it is joseph! rogue, where are my sixty ounces of gold?" "cagliostro scarcely deigned to glance at the furious goldsmith; but in the middle of the profound silence which the incident occasioned among the crowd, a voice, apparently in the clouds, uttered with great distinctness the following words: 'remove this lunatic, who is possessed by infernal spirits.' some of the spectators fell on their knees, others seized the unfortunate goldsmith, and the brilliant cortege passed on" (waite). from strassburg cagliostro* went to paris, where he lived in great splendour, curing diseases, making gold and diamonds, mystifying and duping people of all ranks by the splendid ritual and gorgeous feasting of his secret society, and amassing riches. he got entangled in the affair of the diamond necklace, and left paris. trying to advance his society in italy he was arrested by the agents of the inquisition, and imprisoned, then tried, and condemned to death. the sentence was commuted to perpetual imprisonment. after two years in the prison of san angelo he died at the age of fifty. *transcriber's note: original "cagliosto". chapter ix. paracelsus and some other alchemists. the accounts which have come to us of the men who followed the pursuit of the _one thing_ are vague, scrappy, and confusing. alchemical books abound in quotations from the writings of _geber_. five hundred treatises were attributed to this man during the middle ages, yet we have no certain knowledge of his name, or of the time or place of his birth. hoefer says he probably lived in the middle of the th century, was a native of mesopotamia, and was named _djabar al-konfi_. waite calls him _abou moussah djafar al-sofi_. some of the mediæval adepts spoke of him as the king of india, others called him a prince of persia. most of the arabian writers on alchemy and medicine, after the th century, refer to geber as their master. all the mss. of writings attributed to geber which have been examined are in latin, but the library of leyden is said to possess some works by him written in arabic. these mss. contain directions for preparing many metals, salts, acids, oils, etc., and for performing such operations as distillation, cupellation, dissolution, calcination, and the like. of the other arabian alchemists, the most celebrated in the middle ages were _rhasis_, _alfarabi_, and _avicenna_, who are supposed to have lived in the th and th centuries. the following story of alfarabi's powers is taken from waite's _lives of the alchemystical philosophers_:-- "alfarabi was returning from a pilgrimage to mecca, when, passing through syria, he stopped at the court of the sultan, and entered his presence, while he was surrounded by numerous sage persons, who were discoursing with the monarch on the sciences. alfarabi ... presented himself in his travelling attire, and when the sultan desired he should be seated, with astonishing philosophical freedom he planted himself at the end of the royal sofa. the prince, aghast at his boldness, called one of his officers, and in a tongue generally unknown commanded him to eject the intruder. the philosopher, however, promptly made answer in the same tongue: 'oh, lord, he who acts hastily is liable to hasty repentance.' the prince was equally astounded to find himself understood by the stranger as by the manner in which the reply was given. anxious to know more of his guest he began to question him, and soon discovered that he was acquainted with seventy languages. problems for discussion were then propounded to the philosophers, who had witnessed the discourteous intrusion with considerable indignation and disgust, but alfarabi disputed with so much eloquence and vivacity that he reduced all the doctors to silence, and they began writing down his discourse. the sultan then ordered his musicians to perform for the diversion of the company. when they struck up, the philosopher accompanied them on a lute with such infinite grace and tenderness that he elicited the unmeasured admiration of the whole distinguished assembly. at the request of the sultan he produced a piece of his own composing, sang it, and accompanied it with great force and spirit to the delight of all his hearers. the air was so sprightly that even the gravest philosopher could not resist dancing, but by another tune he as easily melted them to tears, and then by a soft unobtrusive melody he lulled the whole company to sleep." the most remarkable of the alchemists was he who is generally known as _paracelsus_. he was born about , and died about . it is probable that the place of his birth was einsiedeln, near zurich. he claimed relationship with the noble family of bombast von hohenheim; but some of his biographers doubt whether he really was connected with that family. his name, or at any rate the name by which he was known, was aureolus philippus theophrastus bombast von hohenheim. his father in alchemy, trimethius, abbot of spannheim and then of wurzburg, who was a theologian, a poet, an astronomer, and a necromancer, named him _paracelsus_; this name is taken by some to be a kind of græco-latin paraphrase of von hohenheim (of high lineage), and to mean "belonging to a lofty place"; others say it signifies "greater than celsus," who was a celebrated latin writer on medicine of the st century. paracelsus studied at the university of basle; but, getting into trouble with the authorities, he left the university, and for some years wandered over europe, supporting himself, according to one account, by "psalm-singing, astrological productions, chiromantic soothsaying, and, it has been said, by necromantic practices." he may have got as far as constantinople; as a rumour floated about that he received the stone of wisdom from an adept in that city. he returned to basle, and in delivered lectures with the sanction of the rector of the university. he made enemies of the physicians by abusing their custom of seeking knowledge only from ancient writers and not from nature; he annoyed the apothecaries by calling their tinctures, decoctions, and extracts, mere _soup-messes_; and he roused the ire of all learned people by delivering his lectures in german. he was attacked publicly and also anonymously. of the pamphlets published against him he said, "these vile ribaldries would raise the ire of a turtle-dove." and paracelsus was no turtle-dove. the following extract from (a translation of) the preface to _the book concerning the tinctures of the philosophers written against those sophists born since the deluge_, shews that his style of writing was abusive, and his opinion of himself, to say the least, not very humble:-- "from the middle of this age the monarchy of all the arts has been at length derived and conferred on me, theophrastus paracelsus, prince of philosophy and medicine. for this purpose i have been chosen by god to extinguish and blot out all the phantasies of elaborate and false works, of delusive and presumptuous words, be they the words of aristotle, galen, avicenna, mesva, or the dogmas of any among their followers. my theory, proceeding as it does from the light of nature, can never, through its consistency, pass away or be changed; but in the fifty-eighth year after its millennium and a half it will then begin to flourish. the practice at the same time following upon the theory will be proved by wonderful and incredible signs, so as to be open to mechanics and common people, and they will thoroughly understand how firm and immovable is that paracelsic art against the triflings of the sophists; though meanwhile that sophistical science has to have its ineptitude propped up and fortified by papal and imperial privileges.... so then, you wormy and lousy sophist, since you deem the monarch of arcana a mere ignorant, fatuous, and prodigal quack, now, in this mid age, i determine in my present treatise to disclose the honourable course of procedure in these matters, the virtues and preparation of the celebrated tincture of the philosophers for the use and honour of all who love the truth, and in order that all who despise the true arts may be reduced to poverty." the turbulent and restless spirit of paracelsus brought him into open conflict with the authorities of basle. he fled from that town in , and after many wanderings, he found rest at salzburg, under the protection of the archbishop. he died at salzburg in , in his forty-eighth year. the character and abilities of paracelsus have been vastly praised by some, and inordinately abused by others. one author says of him: "he lived like a pig, looked like a drover, found his greatest enjoyment in the company of the most dissolute and lowest rabble, and throughout his glorious life he was generally drunk." another author says: "probably no physician has grasped his life's task with a purer enthusiasm, or devoted himself more faithfully to it, or more fully maintained the moral worthiness of his calling than did the reformer of einsiedeln." he certainly seems to have been loved and respected by his pupils and followers, for he is referred to by them as "the noble and beloved monarch," "the german hemes," and "our dear preceptor and king of arts." there seems no doubt that paracelsus discovered many facts which became of great importance in chemistry: he prepared the inflammable gas we now call hydrogen, by the reaction between iron filings and oil of vitriol; he distinguished metals from substances which had been classed with metals but lacked the essential metalline character of ductility; he made medicinal preparations of mercury, lead and iron, and introduced many new and powerful drugs, notably laudanum. paracelsus insisted that medicine is a branch of chemistry, and that the restoration of the body of a patient to a condition of chemical equilibrium is the restoration to health. paracelsus trusted in his method; he was endeavouring to substitute direct appeal to nature for appeal to the authority of writers about nature. "after me," he cries, "you avicenna, galen, rhasis, montagnana and the others. you after me, not i after you. you of paris, you of montpellier, you of swabia, of meissen and vienna; you who come from the countries along the danube and the rhine; and you, too, from the islands of the ocean. follow me. it is not for me to follow you, for mine is the monarchy." but the work was too arduous, the struggle too unequal. "with few appliances, with no accurate knowledge, with no help from the work of others, without polished and sharpened weapons, and without the skill that comes from long handling of instruments of precision, what could paracelsus effect in his struggle to wrest her secrets from nature? of necessity, he grew weary of the task, and tried to construct a universe which should be simpler than that most complex order which refused to yield to his analysis." and so he came back to the universe which man constructs for himself, and exclaimed-- "each man has ... all the wisdom and power of the world in himself; he possesses one kind of knowledge as much as another, and he who does not find that which is in him cannot truly say that he does not possess it, but only that he was not capable of successfully seeking for it." we leave a great genius, with his own words in our ears: "have no care of my misery, reader; let me bear my burden myself. i have two failings: my poverty and my piety. my poverty was thrown in my face by a burgomaster who had perhaps only seen doctors attired in silken robes, never basking in tattered rags in the sunshine. so it was decreed i was not a doctor. for my piety i am arraigned by the parsons, for ... i do not at all love those who teach what they do not themselves practise." chapter x. summary of the alchemical doctrine.--the replacement of the three principles of the alchemists by the single principle of phlogiston. the _sacred art_, which had its origin and home in egypt, was very definitely associated with the religious rites, and the theological teaching, recognised by the state. the egyptian priests were initiated into the mysteries of the divine art: and as the initiated claimed to imitate the work of the deity, the priest was regarded by the ordinary people as something more than a representative, as a mirror, of the divinity. the sacred art of egypt was transmuted into alchemy by contact with european thought and handicrafts, and the tenets and mysticism of the catholic church; and the conception of nature, which was the result of this blending, prevailed from about the th until towards the end of the th century. like its predecessor, alchemy postulated an orderly universe; but alchemy was richer in fantastic details, more picturesquely embroidered, more prodigal of strange fancies, than the sacred art of egypt. the alchemist constructed his ordered scheme of nature on the basis of the supposed universality of life. for him, everything lived, and the life of things was threefold. the alchemist thought he recognised the manifestation of life in the form, or body, of a thing, in its soul, and in its spirit. things might differ much in appearance, in size, taste, smell, and other outward properties, and yet be intimately related, because, according to the alchemist, they were produced from the same principles, they were animated by the same soul. things might resemble one another closely in their outward properties and yet differ widely in essential features, because, according to the alchemist, they were formed from different elements, in their spiritual properties they were unlike. the alchemists taught that the true transformation, in alchemical language the transmutation, of one thing into another could be effected only by spiritual means acting on the spirit of the thing, because the transmutation consisted essentially in raising the substance to the highest perfection whereof it was capable; the result of this spiritual action might become apparent in the material form of the substance. in attempting to apply such vague conceptions as these, alchemy was obliged to use the language which had been developed for the expression of human emotions and desires, not only for the explanation of the facts it observed, but also for the bare recital of these facts. the outlook of alchemy on the world outside human beings was essentially anthropomorphic. in the image of man, the alchemist created his universe. in the times when alchemy was dominant, the divine scheme of creation, and the place given to man in that scheme, were supposed to be thoroughly understood. everything had its place, designed for it from the beginning, and in that place it remained unless it were forced from it by violent means. a great part of the business of experimental alchemy was to discover the natural position, or condition, of each substance; and the discovery was to be made by interpreting the facts brought to light by observation and experiment by the aid of hypotheses deduced from the general scheme of things which had been formed independently of observation or experiment. alchemy was a part of magic; for magic interprets and corrects the knowledge gained by the senses by the touchstone of generalisations which have been supplied, partly by the emotions, and partly by extra-human authority, and accepted as necessarily true. the conception of natural order which regulates the life of the savage is closely related to that which guided the alchemists. the essential features of both are the notion that everything is alive, and the persuasion that things can be radically acted on only by using life as a factor. there is also an intimate connexion between alchemy and witchcraft. witches were people who were supposed to make an unlawful use of the powers of life; alchemists were often thought to pass beyond what is permitted to the creature, and to encroach on the prerogative of the creator. the long duration of alchemy shows that it appealed to some deep-seated want of human beings. was not that want the necessity for the realisation of order in the universe? men were unwilling to wait until patient examination of the facts of their own nature, and the facts of nature outside themselves, might lead them to the realisation of the interdependence of all things. they found it easier to evolve a scheme of things from a superficial glance at themselves and their surroundings; naturally they adopted the easier plan. alchemy was a part of the plan of nature produced by this method. the extraordinary dominancy of such a scheme is testified to by the continued belief in alchemy, although the one experiment, which seems to us to be the crucial experiment of the system, was never accomplished. but it is also to be remembered that the alchemists were acquainted with, and practised, many processes which we should now describe as operations of manufacturing and technical chemistry; and the practical usefulness of these processes bore testimony, of the kind which convinces the plain man, to the justness of their theories. i have always regarded two facts as most interesting and instructive: that the doctrine of the essential unity of all things, and the simplicity of natural order, was accepted for centuries by many, i think one may say, by most men, as undoubtedly a true presentation of the divine scheme of things; and, secondly, that in more recent times people were quite as certain of the necessary truth of the doctrine, the exact opposite of the alchemical, that the creator had divided his creation into portions each of which was independent of all the others. both of these schemes were formed by the same method, by introspection preceding observation; both were overthrown by the same method, by observation and experiment proceeding hand in hand with reasoning. in each case, the humility of science vanquished the conceit of ignorance. the change from alchemy to chemistry is an admirable example of the change from a theory formed by looking inwards, and then projected on to external facts, to a theory formed by studying facts, and then thinking about them. this change proceeded slowly; it is not possible to name a time when it may be said, here alchemy finishes and chemistry begins. to adapt a saying of one of the alchemists, quoted in a former chapter; alchemy would not easily give up its nature, and fought for its life; but an agent was found strong enough to overcome and kill it, and then that agent also had the power to change the lifeless remains into a new and pure body. the agent was the accurate and imaginative investigation of facts. the first great step taken in the path which led from alchemy to chemistry was the substitution of one principle, the principle of phlogiston, for the three principles of salt, sulphur, and mercury. this step was taken by concentrating attention and investigation, by replacing the superficial examination of many diverse phenomena by the more searching study of one class of occurrences. that the field of study should be widened, it was necessary that it should first be narrowed. lead, tin, iron, or copper is calcined. the prominent and striking feature of these events is the disappearance of the metal, and the formation of something very unlike it. but the original metal is restored by a second process, which is like the first because it also is a calcination, but seems to differ from the first operation in that the burnt metal is calcined with another substance, with grains of wheat or powdered charcoal. led thereto by their theory that destruction must precede re-vivification, death must come before resurrection, the alchemists confined their attention to one feature common to all calcinations of metals, and gave a superficial description of these occurrences by classing them together as processes of mortification. sulphur, wood, wax, oil, and many other things are easily burned: the alchemists said, these things also undergo mortification, they too are killed; but, as "man can restore that which man has destroyed," it must be possible to restore to life the thing which has been mortified. the burnt sulphur, wood, wax, or oil, is not really dead, the alchemists argued; to use the allegory of paracelsus, they are like young lions which are born dead, and are brought to life by the roaring of their parents: if we make a sufficiently loud noise, if we use the proper means, we shall bring life into what seems to be dead material. as it is the roaring of the parents of the young lions which alone can cause the still-born cubs to live, so it is only by the spiritual agency of life, proceeded the alchemical argument, that life can be brought into the mortified sulphur, wood, wax, and oil. the alchemical explanation was superficial, theoretical, in the wrong meaning of that word, and unworkable. it was superficial because it overlooked the fact that the primary calcination, the mortification, of the metals, and the other substances, was effected in the air, that is to say, in contact with something different from the thing which was calcined; the explanation was of the kind which people call theoretical, when they wish to condemn an explanation and put it out of court, because it was merely a re-statement of the facts in the language of a theory which had not been deduced from the facts themselves, or from facts like those to be explained, but from what were supposed to be facts without proper investigation, and, if facts, were of a totally different kind from those to which the explanation applied; and lastly, the explanation was unworkable, because it suggested no method whereby its accuracy could be tested, no definite line of investigation which might be pursued. that great naturalist, the honourable robert boyle (born in , died in ), very perseveringly besought those who examined processes of calcination to pay heed to the action of everything which might take part in the processes. he was especially desirous they should consider what part the air might play in calcinations; he spoke of the air as a "menstruum or additament," and said that, in such operations as calcination, "we may well take the freedom to examine ... whether there intervene not a coalition of the parts of the body wrought upon with those of the menstruum, whereby the produced concrete may be judged to result from the union of both." it was by examining the part played by the air in processes of calcination and burning that men at last became able to give approximately complete descriptions of these processes. boyle recognised that the air is not a simple or elementary substance; he spoke of it as "a confused aggregate of effluviums from such differing bodies, that, though they all agree in constituting by their minuteness and various motions one great mass of fluid matter, yet perhaps there is scarce a more heterogeneous body in the world." clement of alexandria who lived in the end of the nd, and the early part of the rd, century a.d., seems to have regarded the air as playing a very important part in combustions; he said--"airs are divided into two categories; an air for the divine flame, which is the soul; and a material air which is the nourisher of sensible fire, and the basis of combustible matter." sentences like that i have just quoted are found here and there in the writings of the earlier and later alchemists; now and again we also find statements which may be interpreted, in the light of the fuller knowledge we now have, as indicating at least suspicions that the atmosphere is a mixture of different kinds of air, and that only some of these take part in calcining and burning operations. those suspicions were confirmed by experiments on the calcination of metals and other substances, conducted in the th century by jean rey a french physician, and by john mayow of oxford. but these observations and the conclusions founded on them, did not bear much fruit until the time of lavoisier, that is, towards the close of the th century. they were overshadowed and put aside by the work of stahl ( - ). some of the alchemists of the th, th and th centuries taught that combustion and calcination are processes wherein _the igneous principle_ is destroyed, using the word "destroyed" in its alchemical meaning. this description of processes of burning was much more in keeping with the ideas of the time than that given by boyle, rey and mayow. it was adopted by stahl, and made the basis of a general theory of those changes wherein one substance disappears and another, or others, very unlike it, are produced. that he might bring into one point of view, and compare the various changes effected by the agency of fire, stahl invented a new principle, which he named _phlogiston_, and constructed an hypothesis which is generally known as the phlogistic theory. he explained, and applied, this hypothesis in various books, especially in one published at halle in . stahl observed that many substances which differed much from one another in various respects were alike in one respect; they were all combustible. all the combustible substances, he argued, must contain a common principle; he named this supposed principle, _phlogiston_ (from the greek word _phlogistos_ = burnt, or set on fire). stahl said that the phlogiston of a combustible thing escapes as the substance burns, and, becoming apparent to the senses, is named fire or flame. the phlogiston in a combustible substance was supposed to be so intimately associated with something else that our senses cannot perceive it; nevertheless, the theory said, it is there; we can see only the escaping phlogiston, we can perceive only the phlogiston which is set free from its combination with other things. the theory thought of phlogiston as imprisoned in the thing which can be burnt, and as itself forming part of the prison; that the prisoner should be set free, the walls of the prison had to be removed; the freeing of the prisoner destroyed the prison. as escaping, or free, phlogiston was called fire, or flame, so the phlogiston in a combustible substance was sometimes called combined fire, or flame in the state of combination. a peculiarity of the strange thing called phlogiston was that it preferred to be concealed in something, hidden, imprisoned, combined; free phlogiston* was supposed to be always ready to become combined phlogiston. *transcriber's note: original "phlogstion". the phlogistic theory said that what remains when a substance has been burnt is the original substance deprived of phlogiston; and, therefore, to restore the phlogiston to the product of burning is to re-form the combustible substance. but how is such a restoration of phlogiston to be accomplished? evidently by heating the burnt thing with something which is very ready to burn. because, according to the theory, everything which can be burnt contains phlogiston, the more ready a substance is to burn the richer it is in phlogiston; burning is the outrush of phlogiston, phlogiston prefers to be combined with something; therefore, if you mix what remains after burning, with something which is very combustible, and heat the mixture, you are bringing the burnt matter under conditions which are very favourable for the reception of phlogiston by it, for you are bringing it into intimate contact with something from which freedom-hating phlogiston is being forced to escape. charcoal, sulphur, phosphorus, oils and fats are easily burnt; these substances were, therefore, chosen for the purpose of changing things which had been burnt into things which could again be burnt; these, and a few other substances like these, were classed together, and called _phlogisticating agents_. very many of the substances which were dealt with by the experimenters of the last quarter of the th, and the first half of the th, century, were either substances which could be burned, or those which had been produced by burning; hence the phlogistic theory brought into one point of view, compared, and emphasised the similarities between, a great many things which had not been thought of as connected before that theory was promulgated. moreover, the theory asserted that all combustible, or incinerable, things are composed of phlogiston, and another principle, or, as was often said, another element, which is different in different kinds of combustible substances. the metals, for instance, were said to be composed of phlogiston and an earthy principle or element, which was somewhat different in different metals. the phlogisteans taught that the earthy principle of a metal remains in the form of ash, cinders, or calx, when the metal is calcined, or, as they expressed it, when the metal is deprived of its phlogiston. the phlogistic theory savoured of alchemy; it postulated an undefined, undefinable, intangible principle; it said that all combustible substances are formed by the union of this principle with another, which is sometimes of an earthy character, sometimes of a fatty nature, sometimes highly volatile in habit. nevertheless, the theory of stahl was a step away from purely alchemical conceptions towards the accurate description of a very important class of changes. the principle of phlogiston could be recognised by the senses as it was in the act of escaping from a substance; and the other principle of combustible things was scarcely a principle in the alchemical sense, for, in the case of metals at any rate, it remained when the things which had contained it were burnt, and could be seen, handled, and weighed. to say that metals are composed of phlogiston and an earthy substance, was to express facts in such a language that the expression might be made the basis of experimental inquiry; it was very different from the assertion that metals are produced by the spiritual actions of the three principles, salt, mercury and sulphur, the first of which is not salt, the second is not mercury, and the third is not sulphur. the followers of stahl often spoke of metals as composed of phlogiston and an _element_ of an earthy character; this expression also was an advance, from the hazy notion of _element_ in purely alchemical writings, towards accuracy and fulness of description. an element was now something which could he seen and experimented with; it was no longer a semi-spiritual existence which could not be grasped by the senses. the phlogistic theory regarded the calcination of a metal as the separation of it into two things, unlike the metal, and unlike each other; one of these things was phlogiston, the other was an earth-like residue. the theory thought of the re-formation of a metal from its calx, that is, the earthy substance which remains after combustion, as the combination of two things to produce one, apparently homogeneous, substance. metals appeared to the phlogisteans, as they appeared to the alchemists, to be composite substances. processes of burning were regarded by alchemists and phlogisteans alike, as processes of simplification. the fact had been noticed and recorded, during the middle ages, that the earth-like matter which remains when a metal is calcined is heavier than the metal itself. from this fact, modern investigators of natural phenomena would draw the conclusion, that calcination of a metal is an addition of something to the metal, not a separation of the metal into different things. it seems impossible to us that a substance should be separated into portions, and one of these parts should weigh as much as, or more than, the whole. the exact investigation of material changes called chemistry rests on the statement that _mass_, and mass is practically measured by _weight_, is the one property of what we call matter, the determination whereof enables us to decide whether a change is a combination, or coalescence, of different things, or a separation of one thing into parts. that any part of a material system can be removed without the weight of the portion which remains being less than the original weight of the whole system, is unthinkable, in the present state of our knowledge of material changes. but in the th century, and throughout most of the th, only a few of those who examined changes in the properties of substances paid heed to changes of weight; they had not realised the importance of the property of mass, as measured by weight. the convinced upholder of the phlogistic theory had two answers to the argument, that, because the earth-like product of the calcination of a metal weighs more than the metal itself, therefore the metal cannot have lost something in the process; for, if one portion of what is taken away weighs more than the metal from which it has been separated, it is evident that the weight of the two portions into which the metal is said to have been divided must be considerably greater than the weight of the undivided metal. the upholders of the theory sometimes met the argument by saying, "of course the calx weighs more than the metal, because phlogiston tends to lighten a body which contains it; and therefore the body weighs more after it has lost phlogiston than it did when the phlogiston formed part of it;" sometimes, and more often, their answer was--"loss or gain of weight is an accident, the essential thing is change of qualities." if the argument against the separation of a metal into two constituents, by calcination, were answered to-day as it was answered by the upholders of the phlogistic theory, in the middle of the th century, the answers would justly be considered inconsequent and ridiculous. but it does not follow that the statements were either far-fetched or absurd at the time they were made. they were expressed in the phraseology of the time; a phraseology, it is true, sadly lacking in consistency, clearness, and appropriateness, but the only language then available for the description of such changes as those which happen when metals are calcined. one might suppose that it must always have sounded ridiculous to say that the weight of a thing can be decreased by adding something to it, that part of a thing weighs more than the whole of it. but the absurdity disappears if it can be admitted that mass, which is measured by weight, may be a property like colour, or taste, or smell; for the colour, taste, or smell of a thing may certainly be made less by adding something else, and the colour, taste, or smell of a thing may also be increased by adding something else. if we did not know that what we call _quantity of substance_ is measured by the property named _mass_, we might very well accept the proposition that the entrance of phlogiston into a substance decreases the quantity, hence the mass, and, therefore, the weight, of the substance. although stahl and his followers were emerging from the trammels of alchemy, they were still bound by many of the conceptions of that scheme of nature. we have learned, in previous chapters, that the central idea of alchemy was expressed in the saying: "matter must be deprived of its properties in order to draw out its soul." the properties of substances are everything to the modern chemist--indeed, such words as iron, copper, water, and gold are to him merely convenient expressions for certain definable groups of properties--but the phlogisteans regarded the properties of things, including mass, as of secondary importance; they were still trying to get beneath the properties of a thing, to its hypothetical essence, or substance. looking back, we cannot think of phlogiston as a substance, or as a thing, in the modern meanings of these terms as they are used in natural science. nowadays we think, we are obliged to think, of the sum of the quantities of all the things in the universe as unchanging, and unchangeable by any agency whereof we have definite knowledge. the meaning we give to the word _thing_ rests upon the acceptance of this hypothesis. but the terms _substance_, _thing_, _properties_ were used very vaguely a couple of centuries ago; and it would be truly absurd to carry back to that time the meanings which we give to these terms to-day, and then to brand as ridiculous the attempts of the men who studied, then, the same problems which we study now, to express the results of their study in generalisations which employed the terms in question, in what seems to us a loose, vague, and inexact manner. by asserting, and to some extent experimentally proving, the existence of one principle in many apparently very different substances (or, as would be said to-day, one property common to many substances), the phlogistic theory acted as a very useful means for collecting, and placing in a favourable position for closer inspection, many substances which would probably have remained scattered and detached from one another had this theory not been constructed. a single assumption was made, that all combustible substances are alike in one respect, namely, in containing combined fire, or phlogiston; by the help of this assumption, the theory of phlogiston emphasised the fundamental similarity between all processes of combustion. the theory of phlogiston was extraordinarily simple, compared with the alchemical vagaries which preceded it. hoefer says, in his _histoire de la chimie_, "if it is true that simplicity is the distinctive character of verity, never was a theory so true as that of stahl." the phlogistic theory did more than serve as a means for bringing together many apparently disconnected facts. by concentrating the attention of the students of material changes on one class of events, and giving descriptions of these events without using either of the four alchemical elements, or the three principles, stahl, and those who followed him, did an immense service to the advancement of clear thinking about natural occurrences. the principle of phlogiston was more tangible, and more readily used, than the salt, sulphur, and mercury of the alchemists; and to accustom people to speak of the material substance which remained when a metal, or other combustible substance, was calcined or burnt, as one of the _elements_ of the thing which had been changed, prepared the way for the chemical conception of an element as a definite substance with certain definite properties. in addition to these advantages, the phlogistic theory was based on experiments, and led to experiments, the results of which proved that the capacity to undergo combustion might be conveyed to an incombustible substance, by causing it to react with some other substance, itself combustible, under definite conditions. the theory thus prepared the way for the representation of a chemical change as an interaction between definite kinds of substances, marked by precise alterations both of properties and composition. the great fault of the theory of phlogiston, considered as a general conception which brings many facts into one point of view, and leads the way to new and exact knowledge, was its looseness, its flexibility. it was very easy to make use of the theory in a broad and general way; by stretching it here, and modifying it there, it seemed to cover all the facts concerning combustion and calcination which were discovered during two generations after the publication of stahl's books. but many of the subsidiary hypotheses which were required to make the theory cover the new facts were contradictory, or at any rate seemed to be contradictory, of the primary assumptions of the theory. the addition of this ancillary machinery burdened the mechanism of the theory, threw it out of order, and finally made it unworkable. the phlogistic theory was destroyed by its own cumbersomeness. a scientific theory never lasts long if its fundamental assumptions are stated so loosely that they may be easily modified, expanded, contracted, and adjusted to meet the requirements of newly discovered facts. it is true that the theories which have been of the greatest service in science, as summaries of the relations between established facts, and suggestions of lines of investigation, have been stated in terms whose full meaning has gradually unfolded itself. but the foundations of these theories have been at once so rigidly defined and clearly stated as to be incapable of essential modification, and so full of meaning and widely applicable as to cover large classes of facts which were unknown when the theories were constructed. of the founders of the lasting and expansible theories of natural science, it may be said, that "thoughts beyond their thoughts to those high bards were given." chapter xi. the examination of the phenomena of combustion. the alchemists thought that the most effectual method of separating a complex substance into more simple substances was to subject it to the action of heat. they were constantly distilling, incinerating, subliming, heating, in order that the spirit, or inner kernel of things, might be obtained. they took for granted that the action of fire was to simplify, and that simplification proceeded whatever might be the nature of the substance which was subjected to this action. boyle insisted that the effect of heating one substance may be, and often is, essentially different from the effect of heating another substance; and that the behaviour of the same substance when heated, sometimes varies when the conditions are changed. he takes the example of heating sulphur or brimstone: "exposed to a moderate fire in subliming pots, it rises all into dry, and almost tasteless, flowers; whereas being exposed to a naked fire, it affords store of a saline and fretting liquor." boyle thought that the action of fire was not necessarily to separate a thing into its principles or elements, but, in most cases, was either to rearrange the parts of the thing, so that new, and it might be, more complex things, were produced, or to form less simple things by the union of the substance with what he called, "the matter of fire." when the product of heating a substance, for example, tin or lead, weighed more than the substance itself, boyle supposed that the gain in weight was often caused by the "matter of fire" adding itself to the substance which was heated. he commended to the investigation of philosophers this "subtil fluid," which is "able to pierce into the compact and solid bodies of metals, and add something to them that has no despicable weight upon the balance, and is able for a considerable time to continue fixed in the fire." boyle also drew attention to the possibility of action taking place between a substance which is heated and some other substance, wherewith the original thing may have been mixed. in a word, boyle showed that the alchemical assumption--fire simplifies--was too simple; and he taught, by precept and example, that the only way of discovering what the action of fire is, on this substance or on that, is to make accurate experiments. "i consider," he says, "that, generally speaking, to render a reason of an effect or phenomenon, is to deduce it from something else in nature more known than itself; and that consequently there may be divers kinds of degrees of explication of the same thing." boyle published his experiments and opinions concerning the action of fire on different substances in the seventies of the th century; stahl's books, which laid the foundation of the phlogistic theory, and confirmed the alchemical opinion that the action of fire is essentially a simplifying action, were published about forty years later. but fifty years before boyle, a french physician, named jean rey, had noticed that the calcination of a metal is the production of a more complex, from a less complex substance; and had assigned the increase in weight which accompanies that operation to the attachment of particles of the air to the metal. a few years before the publication of boyle's work, from which i have quoted, john mayow, student of oxford, recounted experiments which led to the conclusion that the air contains two substances, one of which supports combustion and the breathing of animals, while the other extinguishes fire. mayow called the active component of the atmosphere _fiery air_; but he was unable to say definitely what becomes of this fiery air when a substance is burnt, although he thought that, in some cases, it probably attaches itself to the burning substances, by which, therefore, it may be said to be fixed. mayow proved that the air wherein a substance is burnt, or an animal breathes, diminishes in volume during the burning, or the breathing. he tried, without much success, to restore to air that part of it which disappears when combustion, or respiration, proceeds in it. what happens when a substance is burnt in the air? the alchemists answered this question by asserting that the substance is separated or analysed into things simpler than itself. boyle said: the process is not necessarily a simplification; it may be, and certainly sometimes is, the formation of something more complicated than the original substance, and when this happens, the process often consists in the fixation of "the matter of fire" by the burning substance. rey said: calcination, of a metal at anyrate, probably consists in the fixation of particles of air by the substance which is calcined. mayow answered the question by asserting, on the ground of the results of his experiments, that the substance which is being calcined lays hold of a particular constituent of the air, not the air as a whole. now, it is evident that if mayow's answer was a true description of the process of calcination, or combustion, it should be possible to separate the calcined substance into two different things, one of which would be the thing which was calcined, and the other would be that constituent of the air which had united with the burning, or calcining, substance. it seems clear to us that the one method of proving the accuracy of mayow's supposition must be, to weigh a definite, combustible, substance--say, a metal; to calcine this in a measured quantity of air; to weigh the product, and to measure the quantity of air which remains; to separate the product of calcination into the original metal, and a kind of air or gas; to prove that the metal thus obtained is the same, and has the same weight, as the metal which was calcined; and to prove that the air or gas obtained from the calcined metal is the same, both in quality and quantity, as the air which disappeared in the process of calcination. this proof was not forthcoming until about a century after the publication of mayow's work. the experiments which furnished the proof were rendered possible by a notable discovery made on the st of august , by the celebrated joseph priestley. priestley prepared many "airs" of different kinds: by the actions of acids on metals, by allowing vegetables to decay, by heating beef, mutton, and other animal substances, and by other methods. he says: "having procured a lens of twelve inches diameter and twenty inches focal distance, i proceeded with great alacrity to examine, by the help of it, what kind of air a great variety of substances, natural and factitious, would yield.... with this apparatus, after a variety of other experiments.... on the st of august, , i endeavoured to extract air from _mercurius calcinatus per se_; and i presently found that, by means of this lens, air was expelled from it very readily. having got about three or four times as much as the bulk of my materials, i admitted water to it, and found that it was not imbibed by it. but what surprised me more than i can well express was, that a candle burned in this air with a remarkably vigorous flame.... i was utterly at a loss how to account for it." [illustration: fig. xvi.] the apparatus used by priestley, in his experiments on different kinds of air, is represented in fig. xvi., which is reduced from an illustration in priestley's book on _airs_. priestley had made a discovery which was destined to change alchemy into chemistry. but he did not know what his discovery meant. it was reserved for the greatest of all chemists, antoine lavoisier, to use the fact stumbled on by priestley. after some months priestley began to think it possible that the new "air" he had obtained from calcined mercury might be fit for respiration. to his surprise he found that a mouse lived in this air much longer than in common air; the new air was evidently better, or purer, than ordinary air. priestley measured what he called the "goodness" of the new air, by a process of his own devising, and concluded that it was "between four and five times as good as common air." priestley was a thorough-going phlogistean. he seems to have been able to describe the results of his experiments only in the language of the phlogistic theory; just as the results of most of the experiments made to-day on the changes of compounds of the element carbon cannot be described by chemists except by making use of the conceptions and the language of the atomic and molecular theory.[ ] [ ] i have given numerous illustrations of the truth of this statement in the book, in this series, entitled _the story of the wanderings of atoms_. the upholder of the phlogistic theory could not think of burning as possible unless there was a suitable receptacle for the phlogiston of the burning substance: when burning occurred in the air, the part played by the air, according to the phlogistic chemist, was to receive the expelled phlogiston; in this sense the air acted as the _pabulum_, or nourishment, of the burning substance. inasmuch as substances burned more vigorously and brilliantly in the new air than in common air, priestley argued that the new air was more ready, more eager, than ordinary air, to receive phlogiston; and, therefore, that the new air contained less phlogiston than ordinary air, or, perhaps, no phlogiston. arguing thus, priestley, of course, named the new aeriform substance _dephlogisticated air_, and thought of it as ordinary air deprived of some, or it might be all, of its phlogiston. the breathing of animals and the burning of substances were supposed to load the atmosphere with phlogiston. priestley spoke of the atmosphere as being constantly "vitiated," "rendered noxious," "depraved," or "corrupted" by processes of respiration and combustion; he called those processes whereby the atmosphere is restored to its original condition (or "depurated," as he said), "dephlogisticating processes." as he had obtained his _dephlogisticated air_ by heating the calx of mercury, that is the powder produced by calcining mercury in the air, priestley was forced to suppose that the calcination of mercury in the air must be a more complex occurrence than merely the expulsion of phlogiston from the mercury: for, if the process consisted only in the expulsion of phlogiston, how could heating what remained produce exceedingly pure ordinary air? it seemed necessary to suppose that not only was phlogiston expelled from mercury during calcination, but that the mercury also imbibed some portion, and that the purest portion, of the surrounding air. priestley did not, however, go so far as this; he was content to suppose that in some way, which he did not explain, the process of calcination resulted in the loss of phlogiston by the mercury, and the gain, by the dephlogisticated mercury, of the property of yielding exceedingly pure or dephlogisticated air when it was heated very strongly. priestley thought of properties in much the same way as the alchemists thought of them, as wrappings, or coverings of an essential something, from which they can be removed and around which they can again be placed. the protean principle of phlogiston was always at hand, and, by skilful management, was ready to adapt itself to any facts. before the phenomena of combustion could be described accurately, it was necessary to do two things; to ignore the theory of phlogiston, and to weigh and measure all the substances which take part in some selected processes of burning. looking back at the attempts made in the past to describe natural events, we are often inclined to exclaim, "why did investigators bind themselves with the cords of absurd theories; why did they always wear blinkers; why did they look at nature through the distorting mists rising from their own imaginations?" we are too ready to forget the tremendous difficulties which beset the path of him who is seeking accurate knowledge. "to climb steep hills requires slow pace at first." forgetting that the statements wherein the men of science of our own time describe the relations between natural events are, and must be, expressed in terms of some general conception, some theory, of these relations; forgetting that the simplest natural occurrence is so complicated that our powers of description are incapable of expressing it completely and accurately; forgetting the uselessness of disconnected facts; we are inclined to overestimate the importance of our own views of nature's ways, and to underestimate the usefulness of the views of our predecessors. moreover, as naturalists have not been obliged, in recent times, to make a complete renunciation of any comprehensive theory wherein they had lived and moved for many years, we forget the difficulties of breaking loose from a way of looking at natural events which has become almost as real as the events themselves, of abandoning a language which has expressed the most vividly realised conceptions of generations of investigators, of forming a completely new mental picture of natural occurrences, and developing a completely new language for the expression of those conceptions and these occurrences. the younger students of natural science of to-day are beginning to forget what their fathers told them of the fierce battle which had to be fought, before the upholders of the darwinian theory of the origin of species were able to convince those for whom the older view, that species are, and always have been, absolutely distinct, had become a matter of supreme scientific, and even ethical, importance. a theory which has prevailed for generations in natural science, and has been accepted and used by everyone, can be replaced by a more accurate description of the relations between natural facts, only by the determination, labour, and genius of a man of supreme power. such a service to science, and humanity, was rendered by darwin; a like service was done, more than three-quarters of a century before darwin, by lavoisier. antoine laurent lavoisier was born in paris in . his father, who was a merchant in a good position, gave his son the best education which was then possible, in physical, astronomical, botanical, and chemical science. at the age of twenty-one, lavoisier gained the prize offered by the government for devising an effective and economical method of lighting the public streets. from that time until, on the th of may , the government of the revolution declared, "the republic has no need of men of science," and the guillotine ended his life, lavoisier continued his researches in chemistry, geology, physics, and other branches of natural science, and his investigations into the most suitable methods of using the knowledge gained by naturalists for advancing the welfare of the community. in chapter vi., i said that when an alchemist boiled water in an open vessel, and obtained a white earthy solid, in place of the water which disappeared, he was producing some sort of experimental proof of the justness of his assertion that water can be changed into earth. lavoisier began his work on the transformations of matter by demonstrating that this alleged transmutation does not happen; and he did this by weighing the water, the vessel, and the earthy solid. lavoisier had constructed for him a pelican of white glass (see fig. xi., p. ), with a stopper of glass. he cleaned, dried, and weighed this vessel; then he put into it rain-water which he had distilled eight times; he heated the vessel, removing the stopper from time to time to allow the expanding air to escape, then put in the stopper, allowed the vessel to cool, and weighed very carefully. the difference between the second and the first weighing was the weight of water in the vessel. he then fastened the stopper securely with cement, and kept the apparatus at a temperature about ° or ° below that of boiling water, for a hundred and one days. at the end of that time a fine white solid had collected on the bottom of the vessel. lavoisier removed the cement from the stopper, and weighed the apparatus; the weight was the same as it had been before the heating began. he removed the stopper; air rushed in, with a hissing noise. lavoisier concluded that air had not penetrated through the apparatus during the process of heating. he then poured out the water, and the solid which had formed in the vessel, set them aside, dried, and weighed the pelican; it had lost - / grains. lavoisier concluded that the solid which had formed in the water was produced by the solvent action of the water on the glass vessel. he argued that if this conclusion was correct, the weight of the solid must be equal to the loss of weight suffered by the vessel; he therefore separated the solid from the water in which it was suspended, dried, and weighed it. the solid weighed - / grains. lavoisier's conclusion seemed to be incorrect; the weight of the solid, which was supposed to be produced by the action of the water on the vessel, was - / grains less than the weight of the material removed from the vessel. but some of the material which was removed from the vessel might have remained dissolved in the water: lavoisier distilled the water, which he had separated from the solid, in a glass vessel, until only a very little remained in the distilling apparatus; he poured this small quantity into a glass basin, and boiled until the whole of the water had disappeared as steam. there remained a white, earthy solid, the weight of which was - / grains. lavoisier had obtained - / + - / = - / grains of solid; the pelican had lost - / grains. the difference between these weights, namely, grains, was accounted for by lavoisier as due to the solvent action of the water on the glass apparatus wherein it had been distilled, and on the glass basin wherein it had been evaporated to dryness. lavoisier's experiments proved that when distilled water is heated in a glass vessel, it dissolves some of the material of the vessel, and the white, earthy solid which is obtained by boiling down the water is merely the material which has been removed from the glass vessel. his experiments also proved that the water does not undergo any change during the process; that at the end of the operation it is what it was at the beginning--water, and nothing but water. by this investigation lavoisier destroyed part of the experimental basis of alchemy, and established the one and only method by which chemical changes can be investigated; the method wherein constant use is made of the balance. lavoisier now turned his attention to the calcination of metals, and particularly the calcination of tin. boyle supposed that the increase in weight which accompanies the calcination of a metal is due to the fixation of "matter of fire" by the calcining metal; rey regarded the increase in weight as the result of the combination of the air with the metal; mayow thought that the atmosphere contains two different kinds of "airs," and one of these unites with the heated metal. lavoisier proposed to test these suppositions by calcining a weighed quantity of tin in a closed glass vessel, which had been weighed before, and should be weighed after, the calcination. if boyle's view was correct, the weight of the vessel and the tin would be greater at the end than it was at the beginning of the operation; for "matter of fire" would pass through the vessel and unite with the metal. if there was no change in the total weight of the apparatus and its contents, and if air rushed in when the vessel was opened after the calcination, and the total weight was then greater than at the beginning of the process, it would be necessary to adopt either the supposition of rey or that of mayow. lavoisier made a series of experiments. the results were these: there was no change in the total weight of the apparatus and its contents; when the vessel was opened after the calcination was finished, air rushed in, and the whole apparatus now weighed more than it did before the vessel was opened; the weight of the air which rushed in was exactly equal to the increase in the weight of the tin produced by the calcination, in other words, the weight of the inrushing air was exactly equal to the difference between the weights of the tin and the calx formed by calcining the tin. lavoisier concluded that to calcine tin is to cause it to combine with a portion of the air wherein it is calcined. the weighings he made showed that about one-fifth of the whole weight of air in the closed flask wherein he calcined tin had disappeared during the operation. other experiments led lavoisier to suspect that the portion of the air which had united with the tin was different from the portion which had not combined with that metal. he, therefore, set himself to discover whether there are different kinds of "airs" in the atmosphere, and, if there is more than one kind of "air," what is the nature of that "air" which combines with a metal in the process of calcination. he proposed to cause a metallic calx (that is, the substance formed by calcining a metal in the air) to give up the "air" which had been absorbed in its formation, and to compare this "air" with atmospheric air. about this time priestley visited paris, saw lavoisier, and told him of the new "air" he had obtained by heating calcined mercury. lavoisier saw the great importance of priestley's discovery; he repeated priestley's experiment, and concluded that the air, or gas, which he refers to in his laboratory journal as "l'air dephlogistique de m. priestley" was nothing else than the purest portion of the air we breathe. he prepared this "air" and burned various substances in it. finding that very many of the products of these combustions had the properties of acids, he gave to the new "air" the name _oxygen_, which means _the acid-producer_. at a later time, lavoisier devised and conducted an experiment which laid bare the change of composition that happens when mercury is calcined in the air. he calcined a weighed quantity of mercury for many days in a measured volume of air, in an apparatus arranged so that he was able to determine how much of the air disappeared during the process; he collected and weighed the red solid which formed on the surface of the heated mercury; finally he heated this red solid to a high temperature, collected and measured the gas which was given off, and weighed the mercury which was produced. the sum of the weights of the mercury and the gas which were produced by heating the calcined mercury was equal to the weight of the calcined mercury; and the weight of the gas produced by heating the calcined mercury was equal to the weight of the portion of the air which had disappeared during the formation of the calcined mercury. this experiment proved that the calcination of mercury in the air consists in the combination of a constituent of the air with the mercury. fig. xvii. (reduced from an illustration in lavoisier's memoir) represents the apparatus used by lavoisier. mayow's supposition was confirmed. [illustration: fig. xvii.] lavoisier made many more experiments on combustion, and proved that in every case the component of the atmosphere which he had named oxygen combined with the substance, or with some part of the substance, which was burned. by these experiments the theory of phlogiston was destroyed; and with its destruction, the whole alchemical apparatus of principles and elements, essences and qualities, souls and spirits, disappeared. chapter xii. the recognition of chemical changes as the interactions of definite substances. the experimental study of combustion made by lavoisier proved the correctness of that part of stahl's phlogistic theory which asserted that all processes of combustion are very similar, but also proved that this likeness consists in the combination of a distinct gaseous substance with the material undergoing combustion, and not in the escape therefrom of the _principle of fire_, as asserted by the theory of stahl. after about the year , it was necessary to think of combustions in the air as combinations of a particular gas, or _air_, with the burning substances, or some portions of them. this description of processes of burning necessarily led to a comparison of the gaseous constituent of the atmosphere which played so important a part in these processes, with the substances which were burned; it led to the examination of the compositions of many substances, and made it necessary to devise a language whereby these compositions could be stated clearly and consistently. we have seen, in former chapters, the extreme haziness of the alchemical views of composition, and the connexions between composition and properties. although boyle[ ] had stated very lucidly what he meant by the composition of a definite substance, about a century before lavoisier's work on combustion, nevertheless the views of chemists concerning composition remained very vague and incapable of definite expression, until the experimental investigations of lavoisier enabled him to form a clear mental picture of chemical changes as interactions between definite quantities of distinct substances. [ ] boyle said, in , "i mean by elements ... certain primitive and simple, or perfectly unmixed bodies; which not being made of any other bodies, or of one another, are the ingredients of which all those called perfectly mixt bodies are immediately compounded, and into which they are ultimately resolved." let us consider some of the work of lavoisier in this direction. i select his experimental examination of the interactions of metals and acids. many experimenters had noticed that gases (or airs, as they were called up till near the end of the th century) are generally produced when metals are dissolving in acids. most of those who noticed this said that the gases came from the dissolving metals; lavoisier said they were produced by the decomposition of the acids. in order to study the interaction of nitric acid and mercury, lavoisier caused a weighed quantity of the metal to react with a weighed quantity of the acid, and collected the gas which was produced; when all the metal had dissolved, he evaporated the liquid until a white solid was obtained; he heated this solid until it was changed to the red substance called, at that time, _red precipitate_, and collected the gas produced. finally, lavoisier strongly heated the red precipitate; it changed to a gas, which he collected, and mercury, which he weighed. the weight of the mercury obtained by lavoisier at the end of this series of changes was the same, less a few grains, as the weight of the mercury which he had caused to react with the nitric acid. the gas obtained during the solution of the metal in the acid, and during the decomposition of the white solid by heat, was the same as a gas which had been prepared by priestley and called by him _nitrous air_; and the gas obtained by heating the red precipitate was found to be oxygen. lavoisier then mixed measured volumes of oxygen and "nitrous air," standing over water; a red gas was formed, and dissolved in the water, and lavoisier proved that the water now contained nitric acid. the conclusions regarding the composition of nitric acid drawn by lavoisier from these experiments was, that "nitric acid is nothing else than _nitrous air_, combined with almost its own volume of the purest part of atmospheric air, and a considerable quantity of water." lavoisier supposed that the stages in the complete reaction between mercury and nitric acid were these: the withdrawal of oxygen from the acid by the mercury, and the union of the compound of mercury and oxygen thus formed with the constituents of the acid which remained when part of its oxygen was taken away. the removal of oxygen from nitric acid by the mercury produced _nitrous air_; when the product of the union of the oxide of mercury and the nitric acid deprived of part of its oxygen was heated, more nitrous air was given off, and oxide of mercury remained, and was decomposed, at a higher temperature, into mercury and oxygen. lavoisier thought of these reactions as the tearing asunder, by mercury, of nitric acid into definite quantities of its three components, themselves distinct substances, nitrous air, water, and oxygen; and the combination of the mercury with a certain measurable quantity of one of these components, namely, oxygen, followed by the union of this compound of mercury and oxygen with what remained of the components of nitric acid. lavoisier had formed a clear, consistent, and suggestive mental picture of chemical changes. he thought of a chemical reaction as always the same under the same conditions, as an action between a fixed and measurable quantity of one substance, having definite and definable properties, with fixed and measurable quantities of other substances, the properties of each of which were definite and definable. lavoisier also recognised that certain definite substances could be divided into things simpler than themselves, but that other substances refused to undergo simplification by division into two or more unlike portions. he spoke of the object of chemistry as follows:--[ ] "in submitting to experiments the different substances found in nature, chemistry seeks to decompose these substances, and to get them into such conditions that their various components may be examined separately. chemistry advances to its end by dividing, sub-dividing, and again sub-dividing, and we do not know what will be the limits of such operations. we cannot be certain that what we regard as simple to-day is indeed simple; all we can say is, that such a substance is the actual term whereat chemical analysis has arrived, and that with our present knowledge we cannot sub-divide it." [ ] i have given a free rendering of lavoisier's words. in these words lavoisier defines the chemical conception of _elements_; since his time an element is "the actual term whereat chemical analysis has arrived," it is that which "with our present knowledge we cannot sub-divide"; and, as a working hypothesis, the notion of _element_ has no wider meaning than this. i have already quoted boyle's statement that by _elements_ he meant "certain primitive and simple bodies ... not made of any other bodies, or of one another." boyle was still slightly restrained by the alchemical atmosphere around him; he was still inclined to say, "this _must_ be the way nature works, she _must_ begin with certain substances which are absolutely simple." lavoisier had thrown off all the trammels which hindered the alchemists from making rigorous experimental investigations. if one may judge from his writings, he had not struggled to free himself from these trammels, he had not slowly emerged from the quagmires of alchemy, and painfully gained firmer ground; the extraordinary clearness and directness of his mental vision had led him straight to the very heart of the problems of chemistry, and enabled him not only calmly to ignore all the machinery of elements, principles, essences, and the like, which the alchemists had constructed so laboriously, but also to construct, in place of that mechanism which hindered inquiry, genuine scientific hypotheses which directed inquiry, and were themselves altered by the results of the experiments they had suggested. lavoisier made these great advances by applying himself to the minute and exhaustive examination of a few cases of chemical change, and endeavouring to account for everything which took part in the processes he studied, by weighing or measuring each distinct substance which was present when the change began, and each which was present when the change was finished. he did not make haphazard experiments; he had a method, a system; he used hypotheses, and he used them rightly. "systems in physics," lavoisier writes, "are but the proper instruments for helping the feebleness of our senses. properly speaking, they are methods of approximation which put us on the track of solving problems; they are the hypotheses which, successively modified, corrected, and changed, by experience, ought to conduct us, some day, by the method of exclusions and eliminations, to the knowledge of the true laws of nature." in a memoir wherein he is considering the production of carbonic acid and alcohol by the fermentation of fruit-juice, lavoisier says, "it is evident that we must know the nature and composition of the substances which can be fermented and the products of fermentation; for nothing is created, either in the operations of art or in those of nature; and it may be laid down that the quantity of material present at the beginning of every operation is the same as the quantity present at the end, that the quality and quantity of the principles[ ] are the same, and that nothing happens save certain changes, certain modifications. on this principle is based the whole art of experimenting in chemistry; in all chemical experiments we must suppose that there is a true equality between the principles[ ] of the substances which are examined and those which are obtained from them by analysis." [ , ] lavoisier uses the word _principle_, here and elsewhere, to mean a definite homogeneous substance; he uses it as synonymous with the more modern terms element and compound. if lavoisier's memoirs are examined closely, it is seen that at the very beginning of his chemical inquiries he assumed the accuracy, and the universal application, of the generalisation "nothing is created, either in the operations of art or in those of nature." naturalists had been feeling their way for centuries towards such a generalisation as this; it had been in the air for many generations; sometimes it was almost realised by this or that investigator, then it escaped for long periods. lavoisier seems to have realised, by what we call intuition, that however great and astonishing may be the changes in the properties of the substances which mutually react, there is no change in the total quantity of material. not only did lavoisier realise and act on this principle, he also measured quantities of substances by the one practical method, namely, by weighing; and by doing this he showed chemists the only road along which they could advance towards a genuine knowledge of material changes. the generalisation expressed by lavoisier in the words i have quoted is now known as the _law of the conservation of mass_; it is generally stated in some such form as this:--the sum of the masses of all the homogeneous substances which take part in a chemical (or physical) change does not itself change. the science of chemistry rests on this law; every quantitative analysis assumes the accuracy, and is a proof of the validity, of it.[ ] [ ] i have considered the law of the conservation of mass in some detail in chapter iv. of _the story of the chemical elements_. by accepting the accuracy of this generalisation, and using it in every experiment, lavoisier was able to form a clear mental picture of a chemical change as the separation and combination of homogeneous substances; for, by using the balance, he was able to follow each substance through the maze of changes, to determine when it united with other substances, and when it separated into substances simpler than itself. chapter xiii. the chemical elements contrasted with the alchemical principles. it was known to many observers in the later years of the th century that the product of the calcination of a metal weighs more than the metal; but it was still possible, at that time, to assert that this fact is of no importance to one who is seeking to give an accurate description of the process of calcination. weight, which measures mass or quantity of substance, was thought of, in these days, as a property like colour, taste, or smell, a property which was sometimes decreased, and sometimes increased, by adding one substance to another. students of natural occurrences were, however, feeling their way towards the recognition of some property of substances which did not change in the haphazard way wherein most properties seemed to alter. lavoisier reached this property at one bound. by his experimental investigations, he taught that, however greatly the properties of one substance may be masked, or altered, by adding another substance to it, yet the property we call mass, and measure by weight, is not affected by these changes; for lavoisier showed, that the mass of the product of the union of two substances is always exactly the sum of the masses of these two substances, and the sum of the masses of the substances whereinto one substance is divided is always exactly equal to that mass of the substance which is divided. for the undefined, ever-changing, protean essence, or soul, of a thing which the alchemists thought of as hidden by wrappings of properties, the exact investigations of lavoisier, and those of others who worked on the same lines as he, substituted this definite, fixed, unmodifiable property of mass. lavoisier, and those who followed in his footsteps, also did away with the alchemical notion of the existence of an essential substratum, independent of changes in those properties of a substance which can be observed by the senses. for the experimental researches of these men obliged naturalists to recognise, that a change in the properties of a definite, homogeneous substance, such as pure water, pure chalk, or pure sulphur, is accompanied (or, as we generally say, is caused) by the formation of a new substance or substances; and this formation, this apparent creation, of new material, is effected, either by the addition of something to the original substance, or by the separation of it into portions which are unlike it, and unlike one another. if the change is a combination, or coalescence, of two things into one, then the mass, and hence the weight, of the product is equal to the sum of those masses, and hence those weights, of the things which have united to form it; if the change is a separation of one distinct substance into several substances, then the sum of the masses, and hence the weights, of the products is equal to that mass, and hence that weight, of the substance which has been separated. consider the word _water_, and the substance represented by this word. in chapter iv., i gave illustrations of the different meanings which have been given to this word; it is sometimes used to represent a material substance, sometimes a quality more or less characteristic of that substance, and sometimes a process to which that substance, and many others like it, may be subjected. but when the word _water_ is used with a definite and exact meaning, it is a succinct expression for a certain group, or collocation, of measurable properties which are always found together, and is, therefore, thought of as a distinct substance. this substance can be separated into two other substances very unlike it, and can be formed by causing these to unite. one hundred parts, by weight, of pure water are always formed by the union of . parts of hydrogen, and . parts of oxygen, and can be separated into these quantities of those substances. when water is formed by the union of hydrogen and oxygen, in the ratio of . parts by weight of the former to . of the latter, the properties of the two substances which coalesce to form it disappear, except their masses. it is customary to say that water _contains_ hydrogen and oxygen; but this expression is scarcely an accurate description of the facts. what we call _substances_ are known to us only by their properties, that is, the ways wherein they act on our senses. hydrogen has certain definite properties, oxygen has other definite properties, and the properties of water are perfectly distinct from those of either of the substances which it is said to contain. it is, therefore, somewhat misleading to say that water _contains_ substances the properties whereof, except their masses, disappeared at the moment when they united and water was produced. nevertheless we are forced to think of water as, in a sense, containing hydrogen and oxygen. for, one of the properties of hydrogen is its power to coalesce, or combine, with oxygen to form water, and one of the properties of oxygen is its ability to unite with hydrogen to form water; and these properties of those substances cannot be recognised, or even suspected, unless certain definite quantities of the two substances are brought together under certain definite conditions. the properties which characterise hydrogen, and those which characterise oxygen, when these things are separated from all other substances, can be determined and measured in terms of the similar properties of some other substance taken as a standard. these two distinct substances disappear when they are brought into contact, under the proper conditions, and something (water) is obtained whose properties are very unlike those of hydrogen or oxygen; this new thing can be caused to disappear, and hydrogen and oxygen are again produced. this cycle of changes can be repeated as often as we please; the quantities of hydrogen and oxygen which are obtained when we choose to stop the process are exactly the same as the quantities of those substances which disappeared in the first operation whereby water was produced. hence, water is an intimate union of hydrogen and oxygen; and, in this sense, water may be said to contain hydrogen and oxygen. the alchemist would have said, the properties of hydrogen and oxygen are destroyed when these things unite to form water, but the essence, or substratum, of each remains. the chemist says, you cannot discover all the properties of hydrogen and oxygen by examining these substances apart from one another, for one of the most important properties of either is manifested only when the two mutually react: the formation of water is not the destruction of the properties of hydrogen and oxygen and the revelation of their essential substrata, it is rather the manifestation of a property of each which cannot be discovered except by causing the union of both. there was, then, a certain degree of accuracy in the alchemical description of the processes we now call chemical changes, as being the removal of the outer properties of the things which react, and the manifestation of their essential substance. but there is a vast difference between this description and the chemical presentment of these processes as reactions between definite and measurable quantities of elements, or compounds, or both, resulting in the re-distribution, of the elements, or the separation of the compounds into their elements, and the formation of new compounds by the re-combination of these elements. let us contrast the two descriptions somewhat more fully. the alchemist wished to effect the transmutation of one substance into another; he despaired of the possibility of separating the elements whereof the substance might be formed, but he thought he could manipulate what he called the _virtues_ of the elements by a judicious use of some or all of the three principles, which he named sulphur, salt, and mercury. he could not state in definite language what he meant by these principles; they were states, conditions, or qualities, of classes of substances, which could not be defined. the directions the alchemist was able to give to those who sought to effect the change of one thing into another were these. firstly, to remove those properties which characterised the thing to be changed, and leave only the properties which it shared with other things like it; secondly, to destroy the properties which the thing to be changed possessed in common with certain other things; thirdly, to commingle the essence of the thing with the essence of something else, in due proportion and under proper conditions; and, finally, to hope for the best, keep a clear head, and maintain a sense of virtue. if he who was about to attempt the transmutation inquired how he was to destroy the specific properties, and the class properties, of the thing he proposed to change, and by what methods he was to obtain its essence, and cause that essence to produce the new thing, he would be told to travel along "the road which was followed by the great architect of the universe in the creation of the world." and if he demanded more detailed directions, he would be informed that the substance wherewith his experiments began must first be mortified, then dissolved, then conjoined, then putrefied, then congealed, then cibated, then sublimed, and fermented, and, finally, exalted. he would, moreover, be warned that in all these operations he must use, not things which he could touch, handle, and weigh, but the _virtues_, the _lives_, the _souls_, of such things. when the student of chemistry desires to effect the transformation of one definite substance into another, he is told to determine, by quantitative experiments, what are the elements, and what the quantities of these elements, which compose the compound which he proposes to change, and the compound into which he proposes to change it; and he is given working definitions of the words _element_ and _compound_. if the compound he desires to produce is found to be composed of elements different from those which form the compound wherewith his operations begin, he is directed to bring about a reaction, or a series of reactions, between the compound which is to be changed, and some other collocation of elements the composition of which is known to be such that it can supply the new elements which are needed for the production of the new compound. since lavoisier realised, for himself, and those who were to come after him, the meaning of the terms _element_ and _compound_, we may say that chemists have been able to form a mental picture of the change from one definite substance to another, which is clear, suggestive, and consistent, because it is an approximately accurate description of the facts discovered by careful and penetrative investigations. this presentment of the change has been substituted for the alchemical conception, which was an attempt to express what introspection and reasoning on the results of superficial investigations, guided by specious analogies, suggested ought to be the facts. lavoisier was the man who made possible the more accurate, and more far-reaching, description of the changes which result in the production of substances very unlike those which are changed; and he did this by experimentally analysing the conceptions of the element and the compound, giving definite and workable meanings to these conceptions, and establishing, on an experimental foundation, the generalisation that the sum of the quantities of the substances which take part in any change is itself unchanged. a chemical element was thought of by lavoisier as "the actual term whereat analysis has arrived," a definite substance "which we cannot subdivide with our present knowledge," but not necessarily a substance which will never be divided. a compound was thought of by him as a definite substance which is always produced by the union of the same quantities of the same elements, and can be separated into the same quantities of the same elements. these conceptions were amplified and made more full of meaning by the work of many who came after lavoisier, notably by john dalton, who was born in and died in . in chapter i., i gave a sketch of the atomic theory of the greek thinkers. the founder of that theory, who flourished about b.c., said that every substance is a collocation of a vast number of minute particles, which are unchangeable, indestructible, and impenetrable, and are therefore properly called _atoms_; that the differences which are observed between the qualities of things are due to differences in the numbers, sizes, shapes, positions, and movements of atoms, and that the process which occurs when one substance is apparently destroyed and another is produced in its place, is nothing more than a rearrangement of atoms. the supposition that changes in the properties of substances are connected with changes in the numbers, movements, and arrangements of different kinds of minute particles, was used in a general way by many naturalists of the th and th centuries; but dalton was the first to show that the data obtained by the analyses of compounds make it possible to determine the relative weights of the atoms of the elements. dalton used the word _atom_ to denote the smallest particle of an element, or a compound, which exhibits the properties characteristic of that element or compound. he supposed that the atoms of an element are never divided in any of the reactions of that element, but the atoms of a compound are often separated into the atoms of the elements whereof the compound is composed. apparently without knowing that the supposition had been made more than two thousand years before his time, dalton was led by his study of the composition and properties of the atmosphere to assume that the atoms of different substances, whether elements or compounds, are of different sizes and have different weights. he assumed that when two elements unite to form only one compound, the atom of that compound has the simplest possible composition, is formed by the union of a single atom of each element. dalton knew only one compound of hydrogen and nitrogen, namely, ammonia. analyses of this compound show that it is composed of one part by weight of hydrogen and . parts by weight of nitrogen. dalton said one atom of hydrogen combines with one atom of nitrogen to form an atom of ammonia; hence an atom of nitrogen is . times heavier than an atom of hydrogen; in other words, if the _atomic weight_ of hydrogen is taken as unity, the _atomic weight_ of nitrogen is expressed by the number . . dalton referred the atomic weights of the elements to the atomic weight of hydrogen as unity, because hydrogen is lighter than any other substance; hence the numbers which tell how much heavier the atoms of the elements are than an atom of hydrogen are always greater than one, are always positive numbers. when two elements unite in different proportions, by weight, to form more than one compound, dalton supposed that (in most cases at any rate) one of the compounds is formed by the union of a single atom of each element; the next compound is formed by the union of one atom of the element which is present in smaller quantity with two, three, or more, atoms of the other element, and the next compound is formed by the union of one atom of the first element with a larger number (always, necessarily, a whole number) of atoms of the other element than is contained in the second compound; and so on. from this assumption, and the daltonian conception of the atom, it follows that the quantities by weight of one element which are found to unite with one and the same weight of another element must always be expressible as whole multiples of one number. for if two elements, a and b, form a compound, that compound is formed, by supposition, of one atom of a and one atom of b; if more of b is added, at least one atom of b must be added; however much of b is added the quantity must be a whole number of atoms; and as every atom of b is the same in all respects as every other atom of b, the weights of b added to a constant weight of a must be whole multiples of the atomic weight of b. the facts which were available in dalton's time confirmed this deduction from the atomic theory within the limits of experimental errors; and the facts which have been established since dalton's time are completely in keeping with the deduction. take, for instance, three compounds of the elements nitrogen and oxygen. that one of the three which contains least oxygen is composed of . _per cent._ of nitrogen, and . _per cent._ of oxygen; if the atomic weight of nitrogen is taken to be . , which is the weight of nitrogen that combines with one part by weight of hydrogen, then the weight of oxygen combined with . of nitrogen is . ( . : . = . : . ). the weights of oxygen which combine with . parts by weight of nitrogen to form the second and third compounds, respectively, must be whole multiples of . ; these weights are . and . . now . = . x , and . = . x . hence, the quantities by weight of oxygen which combine with one and the same weight of nitrogen are such that two of these quantities are whole multiples of the third quantity. dalton's application of the greek atomic theory to the facts established by the analyses of compounds enabled him to attach to each element a number which he called the atomic weight of the element, and to summarise all the facts concerning the compositions of compounds in the statement, that the elements combine in the ratios of their atomic weights, or in the ratios of whole multiples of their atomic weights. all the investigations which have been made into the compositions of compounds, since dalton's time, have confirmed the generalisation which followed from dalton's application of the atomic theory. even if the theory of atoms were abandoned, the generalisation would remain, as an accurate and exact statement of facts which hold good in every chemical change, that a number can be attached to each element, and the weights of the elements which combine are in the ratios of these numbers, or whole multiples of these numbers. since chemists realised the meaning of dalton's book, published in , and entitled, _a new system of chemical philosophy_, elements have been regarded as distinct and definite substances, which have not been divided into parts different from themselves, and unite with each other in definite quantities by weight which can be accurately expressed as whole multiples of certain fixed quantities; and compounds have been regarded as distinct and definite substances which are formed by the union of, and can be separated into, quantities of various elements which are expressible by certain fixed numbers or whole multiples thereof. these descriptions of elements and compounds are expressions of actual facts. they enable chemists to state the compositions of all the compounds which are, or can be, formed by the union of any elements. for example, let a, b, c, and d represent four elements, and also certain definite weights of these elements, then the compositions of all the compounds which can be formed by the union of these elements are expressed by the scheme a_{_n_} b_{_m_} c_{_p_} d_{_q_}, where _m_ _n_ _p_ and _q_ are whole numbers. these descriptions of elements and compounds also enable chemists to form a clear picture to themselves of any chemical change. they think of a chemical change as being; ( ) a union of those weights of two, or more, elements which are expressed by the numbers attached to these elements, or by whole multiples of these numbers; or ( ) a union of such weights of two, or more, compounds as can be expressed by certain numbers or by whole multiples of these numbers; or ( ) a reaction between elements and compounds, or between compounds and compounds, resulting in the redistribution of the elements concerned, in such a way that the complete change of composition can be expressed by using the numbers, or whole multiples of the numbers, attached to the elements. how different is this conception of a change wherein substances are formed, entirely unlike those things which react to form them, from the alchemical presentment of such a process! the alchemist spoke of stripping off the outer properties of the thing to be changed, and, by operating spiritually on the soul which was thus laid bare, inducing the essential virtue of the substance to exhibit its powers of transmutation. but he was unable to give definite meanings to the expressions which he used, he was unable to think clearly about the transformations which he tried to accomplish. the chemist discards the machinery of virtues, souls, and powers. it is true that he substitutes a machinery of minute particles; but this machinery is merely a means of thinking clearly and consistently about the changes which he studies. the alchemist thought, vaguely, of substance as something underlying, and independent of, properties; the chemist uses the expression, this or that substance, as a convenient way of presenting and reasoning about certain groups of properties. it seems to me that if we think of _matter_ as something more than properties recognised by the senses, we are going back on the road which leads to the confusion of the alchemical times. the alchemists expressed their conceptions in what seems to us a crude, inconsistent, and very undescriptive language. chemists use a language which is certainly symbolical, but also intelligible, and on the whole fairly descriptive of the facts. a name is given to each elementary substance, that is, each substance which has not been decomposed; the name generally expresses some characteristic property of the substance, or tells something about its origin or the place of its discovery. the names of compounds are formed by putting together the names of the elements which combine to produce them; and the relative quantities of these elements are indicated either by the use of latin or greek prefixes, or by variations in the terminal syllables of the names of the elements. chapter xiv. the modern form of the alchemical quest of the one thing. the study of the properties of the elements shows that these substances fall into groups, the members of each of which are like one another, and form compounds which are similar. the examination of the properties and compositions of compounds has shown that similarity of properties is always accompanied by similarity of composition. hence, the fact that certain elements are very closely allied in their properties suggests that these elements may also be allied in their composition. now, to speak of the composition of an element is to think of the element as formed by the union of at least two different substances; it implies the supposition that some elements at any rate are really compounds. the fact that there is a very definite connexion between the values of the atomic weights, and the properties, of the elements, lends some support to the hypothesis that the substances we call, and are obliged at present to call, elements, may have been formed from one, or a few, distinct substances, by some process of progressive change. if the elements are considered in the order of increasing atomic weights, from hydrogen, whose atomic weight is taken as unity because it is the lightest substance known, to uranium, an atom of which is times heavier than an atom of hydrogen, it is found that the elements fall into periods, and the properties of those in one period vary from element to element, in a way which is, broadly and on the whole, like the variation of the properties of those in other periods. this fact suggests the supposition--it might be more accurate to say the speculation--that the elements mark the stable points in a process of change, which has not proceeded continuously from a very simple substance to a very complex one, but has repeated itself, with certain variations, again and again. if such a process has occurred, we might reasonably expect to find substances exhibiting only minute differences in their properties, differences so slight as to make it impossible to assign the substances, definitely and certainly, either to the class of elements or to that of compounds. we find exactly such substances among what are called the _rare earths_. there are earth-like substances which exhibit no differences of chemical properties, and yet show minute differences in the characters of the light which they emit when they are raised to a very high temperature. the results of analysis by the spectroscope of the light emitted by certain elements at different temperatures may be reasonably interpreted by supposing that these elements are separated into simpler substances by the action on them of very large quantities of thermal energy. the spectrum of the light emitted by glowing iron heated by a bunsen flame (say, at ° c. = about ° f.) shows a few lines and flutings; when iron is heated in an electric arc (say, to ° c. = about ° f.) the spectrum shows some two thousand lines; at the higher temperature produced by the electric spark-discharge, the spectrum shows only a few lines. as a guide to further investigation, we may provisionally infer from these facts that iron is changed at very high temperatures into substances simpler than itself. sir norman lockyer's study of the spectra of the light from stars has shown that the light from those stars which are presumably the hottest, judging by the general character of their spectra, reveals the presence of a very small number of chemical elements; and that the number of spectral lines, and, therefore, the number of elements, increases as we pass from the hottest to cooler stars. at each stage of the change from the hottest to cooler stars certain substances disappear and certain other substances take their places. it may be supposed, as a suggestive hypothesis, that the lowering of stellar temperature is accompanied by the formation, from simpler forms of matter, of such elements as iron, calcium, manganese, and other metals. in the year , the french chemist becquerel discovered the fact that salts of the metal uranium, the atomic weight of which is , and is greater than that of any other element, emit rays which cause electrified bodies to lose their electric charges, and act on photographic plates that are wrapped in sheets of black paper, or in thin sheets of other substances which stop rays of light. the _radio-activity_ of salts of uranium was proved not to be increased or diminished when these salts had been shielded for five years from the action of light by keeping them in leaden boxes. shortly after becquerel's discovery, experiments proved that salts of the rare metal thorium are radio-active. this discovery was followed by madame curie's demonstration of the fact that certain specimens of _pitchblende_, a mineral which contains compounds of uranium and of many other metals, are extremely radio-active, and by the separation from pitchblende, by monsieur and madame curie, of new substances much more radio-active than compounds of uranium or of thorium. the new substances were proved to be compounds chemically very similar to salts of barium. their compositions were determined on the supposition that they were salts of an unknown metal closely allied to barium. because of the great radio-activity of the compounds, the hypothetical metal of them was named _radium_. at a later time, radium was isolated by madame curie. it is described by her as a white, hard, metal-like solid, which reacts with water at the ordinary temperature, as barium does. since the discovery of radium compounds, many radio-active substances have been isolated. only exceedingly minute quantities of any of them have been obtained. the quantities of substances used in experiments on radio-activity are so small that they escape the ordinary methods of measurement, and are scarcely amenable to the ordinary processes of the chemical laboratory. fortunately, radio-activity can be detected and measured by electrical methods of extraordinary fineness, methods the delicacy of which very much more exceeds that of spectroscopic methods than the sensitiveness of these surpasses that of ordinary chemical analysis. at the time of the discovery of radio-activity, about seventy-five substances were called elements; in other words, about seventy-five different substances were known to chemists, none of which had been separated into unlike parts, none of which had been made by the coalescence of unlike substances. compounds of only two of these substances, uranium and thorium, are radio-active. radio-activity is a very remarkable phenomenon. so far as we know at present, radio-activity is not a property of the substances which form almost the whole of the rocks, the waters, and the atmosphere of the earth; it is not a property of the materials which constitute living organisms. it is a property of some thirty substances--of course, the number may be increased--a few of which are found widely distributed in rocks and waters, but none of which is found anywhere except in extraordinarily minute quantity. radium is the most abundant of these substances; but only a very few grains of radium chloride can be obtained from a couple of tons of pitchblende. in chapter x. of _the story of the chemical elements_ i have given a short account of the outstanding phenomena of radio-activity; for the present purpose it will suffice to state a few facts of fundamental importance. radio-active substances are stores of energy, some of which is constantly escaping from them; they are constantly changing without external compulsion, and are constantly radiating energy: all explosives are storehouses of energy which, or part of which, can be obtained from them; but the liberation of their energy must be started by some kind of external shock. when an explosive substance has exploded, its existence as an explosive is finished; the products of the explosion are substances from which energy cannot be obtained: when a radio-active substance has exploded, it explodes again, and again, and again; a time comes, sooner or later, when it has changed into substances that are useless as sources of energy. the disintegration of an explosive, started by an external force, is generally completed in a fraction of a second; change of condition changes the rate of explosion: the "half-life period" of each radio-active substance is a constant characteristic of it; if a gram of radium were kept for about years, half of it would have changed into radio-inactive substances. conditions may be arranged so that an explosive remains unchanged--wet gun-cotton is not exploded by a shock which would start the explosion of dry gun-cotton--in other words, the explosion of an explosive can be regulated: the explosive changes of a radio-active substance, which are accompanied by the radiation of energy, cannot be regulated; they proceed spontaneously in a regular and definable manner which is not influenced by any external conditions--such as great change of temperature, presence or absence of other substances--so far as these conditions have been made the subject of experiment: the amount of activity of a radio-active substance has not been increased or diminished by any process to which the substance has been subjected. explosives are manufactured articles; explosiveness is a property of certain arrangements of certain quantities of certain elements: so far as experiments have gone, it has not been found possible to add the property of radio-activity to an inactive substance, or to remove the property of radio-activity from an active substance; the cessation of the radio-activity of an active substance is accompanied by the disappearance of the substance, and the production of inactive bodies altogether unlike the original active body. radio-active substances are constantly giving off energy in the form of heat, sending forth _rays_ which have definite and remarkable properties, and producing gaseous _emanations_ which are very unstable, and change, some very rapidly, some less rapidly, into other substances, and emit _rays_ which are generally the same as the rays emitted by the parent substance. in briefly considering these three phenomena, i shall choose radium compounds as representative of the class of radio-active substances. radium compounds spontaneously give off energy in the form of heat. a quantity of radium chloride which contains gram of radium continuously gives out, per hour, a quantity of heat sufficient to raise the temperature of gram of water through ° c., or grams of water through ° c. the heat given out by gram of radium during twenty-four hours would raise the temperature of grams of water through ° c.; in one year the temperature of , grams of water would be raised through ° c.; and in years, which is approximately the half-life period of radium, the temperature of , , _kilograms_ of water would be raised through ° c. these results may be expressed by saying that if gram (about grains) of radium were kept until half of it had changed into inactive substances, and if the heat spontaneously produced during the changes which occurred were caused to act on water, that quantity of heat would raise the temperature of about ½ tons of water from its freezing- to its boiling-point. radium compounds send forth three kinds of rays, distinguished as _alpha_, _beta_, and _gamma_ rays. experiments have made it extremely probable that the [alpha]-rays are streams of very minute particles, somewhat heavier than atoms of hydrogen, moving at the rate of about , miles per second; and that the [beta]-rays are streams of much more minute particles, the mass of each of which is about one one-thousandth of the mass of an atom of hydrogen, moving about ten times more rapidly than the [alpha]-particles, that is, moving at the rate of about , miles per second. the [gamma]-rays are probably pulsations of the ether, the medium supposed to fill space. the emission of [alpha]-rays by radium is accompanied by the production of the inert elementary gas, helium; therefore, the [alpha]-rays are, or quickly change into, rapidly moving particles of helium. the particles which constitute the [beta]-rays carry electric charges; these electrified particles, each approximately a thousand times lighter than an atom of hydrogen, moving nearly as rapidly as the pulsations of the ether which we call light, are named _electrons_. the rays from radium compounds discharge electrified bodies, ionise gases, that is, cause them to conduct electricity, act on photographic plates, and produce profound changes in living organisms. the radium emanation is a gas about times heavier than hydrogen; to this gas sir william ramsay has given the name _niton_. the gas has been condensed to a colourless liquid, and frozen to an opaque solid which glows like a minute arc-light. radium emanation gives off [alpha]-particles, that is, very rapidly moving atoms of helium, and deposits exceedingly minute quantities of a solid, radio-active substance known as radium a. the change of the emanation into helium and radium a proceeds fairly rapidly: the half-life period of the emanation is a little less than four days. this change is attended by the liberation of much energy. the only satisfactory mental picture which the facts allow us to form, at present, of the emission of [beta]-rays from radium compounds is that which represents these rays as streams of electrons, that is, particles, each about a thousand times lighter than an atom of hydrogen, each carrying an electric charge, and moving at the rate of about , miles per second, that is, nearly as rapidly as light. when an electric discharge is passed from a plate of metal, arranged as the kathode, to a metallic wire arranged as the anode, both sealed through the walls of a glass tube or bulb from which almost the whole of the air has been extracted, rays proceed from the kathode, in a direction at right angles thereto, and, striking the glass in the neighbourhood of the anode, produce a green phosphorescence. facts have been gradually accumulated which force us to think of these _kathode rays_ as streams of very rapidly moving electrons, that is, as streams of extraordinarily minute electrically charged particles identical with the particles which form the [beta]-rays emitted by compounds of radium. the phenomena of radio-activity, and also the phenomena of the kathode rays, have obliged us to refine our machinery of minute particles by including therein particles at least a thousand times lighter than atoms of hydrogen. the term _electron_ was suggested, a good many years ago, by dr johnstone stoney, for the unit charge of electricity which is carried by an atom of hydrogen when hydrogen atoms move in a liquid or gas under the directing influence of the electric current. some chemists speak of the electrons, which are the [beta]-rays from radium, and the kathode rays produced in almost vacuous tubes, as non-material particles of electricity. non-material means devoid of mass. the method by which approximate determinations have been made of the charges on electrons consists in measuring the ratio between the charges and the masses of these particles. if the results of the determinations are accepted, electrons are not devoid of mass. electrons must be thought of as material particles differing from other minute material particles in the extraordinary smallness of their masses, in the identity of their properties, including their mass, in their always carrying electric charges, and in the vast velocity of their motion. we must think of an electron either as a unit charge of electricity one property of which is its minute mass, or as a material particle having an extremely small mass and carrying a unit charge of electricity: the two mental pictures are almost, if not quite, identical. electrons are produced by sending an electric discharge through a glass bulb containing a minute quantity of air or other gas, using metallic plates or wires as kathode and anode. experiments have shown that the electrons are identical in all their properties, whatever metal is used to form the kathode and anode, and of whatever gas there is a minute quantity in the bulb. the conclusion must be drawn that identical electrons are constituents of, or are produced from, very different kinds of chemical elements. as the facts about kathode rays, and the facts of radio-activity are (at present) inexplicable except on the supposition that these phenomena are exhibited by particles of extraordinary minuteness, and as the smallest particles with which chemists are concerned in their everyday work are the atoms of the elements, we seem obliged to think of many kinds of atoms as structures, not as homogeneous bodies. we seem obliged to think of atoms as very minute material particles, which either normally are, or under definite conditions may be, associated with electrically charged particles very much lighter than themselves, all of which are identical, whatever be the atoms with which they are associated or from which they are produced. in their study of different kinds of matter, chemists have found it very helpful to place in one class those substances which they have not been able to separate into unlike parts. they have distinguished this class of substances from other substances, and have named them _elements_. the expression _chemical elements_ is merely a summary of certain observed facts. for many centuries chemists have worked with a conceptual machinery based on the notion that matter has a grained structure. for more than a hundred years they have been accustomed to think of atoms as the ultimate particles with which they have had to deal. working with this order-producing instrument, they have regarded the properties of elements as properties of the atoms, or of groups of a few of the atoms, of these substances. that they might think clearly and suggestively about the properties of elements, and connect these with other chemical facts, they have translated the language of sense-perceptions into the language of thought, and, for _properties of those substances which have not been decomposed_, have used the more fertile expression _atomic properties_. when a chemist thinks of an atom, he thinks of the minutest particle of one of the substances which have the class-mark _have-not-been-decomposed_, and the class-name _element_. the chemist does not call these substances elements because he has been forced to regard the minute particles of them as undivided, much less because he thinks of these particles as indivisible; his mental picture of their structure as an atomic structure formed itself from the fact that they had not been decomposed. the formation of the class _element_ followed necessarily from observed facts, and has been justified by the usefulness of it as an instrument for forwarding accurate knowledge. the conception of the elementary atom as a particle which had not been decomposed followed from many observed facts besides those concerning elements, and has been justified by the usefulness of it as an instrument for forwarding accurate knowledge. investigations proved radio-activity to be a property of the very minute particles of certain substances, and each radio-active substance to have characteristic properties, among which were certain of those that belong to elements, and to some extent are characteristic of elements. evidently, the simplest way for a chemist to think about radio-activity was to think of it as an atomic property; hence, as atomic properties had always been regarded, in the last analysis, as properties of elements, it was natural to place the radio-active substances in the class _elements_, provided that one forgot for the time that these substances have not the class-mark _have-not-been-decomposed_. as the facts of radio-activity led to the conclusion that some of the minute particles of radio-active substances are constantly disintegrating, and as these substances had been labelled _elements_, it seemed probable, or at least possible, that the other bodies which chemists have long called elements are not true elements, but are merely more stable collocations of particles than the substances which are classed as compounds. as compounds can be changed into certain other compounds, although not into any other compounds, a way seemed to be opening which might lead to the transformation of some elements into some other elements. the probability that one element might be changed into another was increased by the demonstration of the connexions between uranium and radium. the metal uranium has been classed with the elements since it was isolated in . in , becquerel found that compounds of uranium, and also the metal itself, are radio-active. in the light of what is now known about radio-activity, it is necessary to suppose that some of the minute particles of uranium emit particles lighter than themselves, and change into some substance, or substances, different from uranium; in other words, it is necessary to suppose that some particles of uranium are spontaneously disintegrating. this supposition is confirmed by the fact, experimentally proved, that uranium emits [alpha]-rays, that is, atoms of helium, and produces a substance known as uranium x. uranium x is itself radio-active; it emits [beta]-rays, that is, it gives off electrons. inasmuch as all minerals which contain compounds of uranium contain compounds of radium also, it is probable that radium is one of the disintegration-products of uranium. the rate of decay of radium may be roughly expressed by saying that, if a quantity of radium were kept for ten thousand years, only about one per cent. of the original quantity would then remain unchanged. even if it were assumed that at a remote time the earth's crust contained considerable quantities of radium compounds, it is certain that they would have completely disappeared long ago, had not compounds of radium been reproduced from other materials. again, the most likely hypothesis is that compounds of radium are being produced from compounds of uranium. uranium is a substance which, after being rightly classed with the elements for more than half a century, because it had not been separated into unlike parts, must now be classed with the radium-like substances which disintegrate spontaneously, although it differs from other radio-active substances in that its rate of change is almost infinitively slower than that of any of them, except thorium.[ ] thorium, a very rare metal, is the second of the seventy-five or eighty elements known when radio-activity was discovered, which has been found to undergo spontaneous disintegration with the emission of rays. the rate of change of thorium is considerably slower than that of uranium.[ ] none of the other substances placed in the class of elements is radio-active. [ ] the life-period of uranium is probably about eight thousand million years. [ ] the life-period of thorium is possibly about forty thousand million years. on p. i said, that when the radio-active substances had been labelled _elements_, the facts of radio-activity led some chemists to the conclusion that the other bodies which had for long been called by this class-name, or at any rate some of these bodies, are perhaps not true elements, but are merely more stable collocations of particles than the substances called compounds. it seems to me that this reasoning rests on an unscientific use of the term _element_; it rests on giving to that class-name the meaning, _substances asserted to be undecomposable_. a line of demarcation is drawn between _elements_, meaning thereby forms of matter said to be undecomposable but probably capable of separation into unlike parts, and _true elements_, meaning thereby groups of identical undecomposable particles. if one names the radio-active substances _elements_, one is placing in this class substances which are specially characterised by a property the direct opposite of that the possession of which by other substances was the reason for the formation of the class. to do this may be ingenious; it is certainly not scientific. since the time of lavoisier, since the last decade of the eighteenth century, careful chemists have meant by an element a substance which has not been separated into unlike parts, and they have not meant more than that. the term _element_ has been used by accurate thinkers as a useful class-mark which connotes a property--the property of not having been decomposed--common to all substances placed in the class, and differentiating them from all other substances. whenever chemists have thought of elements as the ultimate kinds of matter with which the physical world is constructed--and they have occasionally so thought and written--they have fallen into quagmires of confusion. of course, the elements may, some day, be separated into unlike parts. the facts of radio-activity certainly suggest some kind of inorganic evolution. whether the elements are decomposed is to be determined by experimental inquiry, remembering always that no number of failures to simplify them will justify the assertion that they cannot be simplified. chemistry neither asserts or denies the decomposability of the elements. at present, we have to recognise the existence of extremely small quantities, widely distributed in rocks and waters, of some thirty substances, the minute particles of which are constantly emitting streams of more minute, identical particles that carry with them very large quantities of energy, all of which thirty substances are characterised, and are differentiated from all other classes of substances wherewith chemistry is concerned, by their spontaneous mutability, and each is characterised by its special rate of change and by the nature of the products of its mutations. we have now to think of the minute particles of two of the seventy-five or eighty substances which until the other day had not been decomposed, and were therefore justly called elements, as very slowly emitting streams of minuter particles and producing characteristic products of their disintegration. and we have to think of some eighty substances as particular kinds of matter, at present properly called elements, because they are characterised, and differentiated from all other substances, by the fact that none of them has been separated into unlike parts. the study of radio-activity has introduced into chemistry and physics a new order of minute particles. dalton made the atom a beacon-light which revealed to chemists paths that led them to wider and more accurate knowledge. avogadro illuminated chemical, and also physical, ways by his conception of the molecule as a stable, although separable, group of atoms with particular properties different from those of the atoms which constituted it. the work of many investigators has made the old paths clearer, and has shown to chemists and physicists ways they had not seen before, by forcing them to think of, and to make use of, a third kind of material particles that are endowed with the extraordinary property of radio-activity. dalton often said: "thou knowest thou canst not cut an atom"; but the fact that he applied the term _atom_ to the small particles of compounds proves that he had escaped the danger of logically defining the atom, the danger of thinking of it as a particle which never can be cut. the molecule of avogadro has always been a decomposable particle. the peculiarity of the new kind of particles, the particles of radio-active bodies, is, not that they can be separated into unlike parts by the action of external forces, but that they are constantly separating of their own accord into unlike parts, and that their spontaneous disintegration is accompanied by the production of energy, the quantity of which is enormous in comparison with the minuteness of the material specks which are the carriers of it. the continued study of the properties of the minute particles of radio-active substances--a new name is needed for those most mutable of material grains--must lead to discoveries of great moment for chemistry and physics. that study has already thrown much light on the phenomena of electric conductivity; it has given us the electron, a particle at least a thousand times lighter than an atom of hydrogen; it has shown us that identical electrons are given off by, or are separated from, different kinds of elementary atoms, under definable conditions; it has revealed unlooked-for sources of energy; it has opened, and begun the elucidation of, a new department of physical science; it has suggested a new way of attacking the old problem of the alchemists, the problem of the transmutation of the elements. the minute particles of two of the substances for many years classed as elements give off electrons; uranium and thorium are radio-active. electrons are produced by sending an electric discharge through very small traces of different gases, using electrodes of different metals. electrons are also produced by exposing various metals to the action of ultra-violet light, and by raising the temperature of various metals to incandescence. electrons are always identical, whatever be their source. three questions suggest themselves. can the atoms of all the elements be caused to give off electrons? are electrons normal constituents of all elementary atoms? are elementary atoms collocations of electrons? these questions are included in the demand--is it possible "to imagine a model which has in it the potentiality of explaining" radio-activity and other allied phenomena, as well as all other chemical and physical properties of elements and compounds? these questions are answerable by experimental investigation, and only by experimental investigation. if experimental inquiry leads to affirmative answers to the questions, we shall have to think of atoms as structures of particles much lighter than themselves; we shall have to think of the atoms of all kinds of substances, however much the substances differ chemically and physically, as collocations of identical particles; we shall have to think of the properties of atoms as conditioned, in our final analysis, by the number and the arrangement of their constitutive electrons. now, if a large probability were established in favour of the view that different atoms are collocations of different numbers of identical particles, or of equal numbers of differently arranged identical particles, we should have a guide which might lead to methods whereby one collocation of particles could be formed from another collocation of the same particles, a guide which might lead to methods whereby one element could be transformed into another element. to attempt "to imagine a model which has in it the potentiality of explaining" radio-activity, the production of kathode rays, and the other chemical and physical properties of elements and compounds, might indeed seem to be a hopeless undertaking. a beginning has been made in the mental construction of such a model by professor sir j.j. thomson. to attempt a description of his reasoning and his results is beyond the scope of this book.[ ] [ ] the subject is discussed in sir j.j. thomson's _electricity and matter_. the facts that the emanation from radium compounds spontaneously gives off very large quantities of energy, and that the emanation can easily be brought into contact with substances on which it is desired to do work, suggested to sir william ramsay that the transformation of compounds of one element into compounds of another element might possibly be effected by enclosing a solution of a compound along with radium emanation in a sealed tube, and leaving the arrangement to itself. under these conditions, the molecules of the compound would be constantly bombarded by a vast number of electrons shot forth at enormous velocities from the emanation. the notion was that the molecules of the compound would break down under the bombardment, and that the atoms so produced might be knocked into simpler groups of particles--in other words, changed into other atoms--by the terrific, silent shocks of the electrons fired at them incessantly by the disintegrating emanation. sir william ramsay regards his experimental results as establishing a large probability in favour of the assertion that compounds of copper were transformed into compounds of lithium and sodium, and compounds of thorium, of cerium, and of certain other rare metals, into compounds of carbon. the experimental evidence in favour of this statement has not been accepted by chemists as conclusive. a way has, however, been opened which may lead to discoveries of great moment. let us suppose that the transformation of one element into another element or into other elements has been accomplished. let us suppose that the conception of elementary atoms as very stable arrangements of many identical particles, from about a thousand to about a quarter of a million times lighter than the atoms, has been justified by crucial experiments. let us suppose that the conception of the minute grains of radio-active substances as particular but constantly changing arrangements of the same identical particles, stable groups of which are the atoms of the elements, has been firmly established. one result of the establishment of the electronic conception of atomic structure would be an increase of our wonder at the complexity of nature's ways, and an increase of our wonder that it should be possible to substitute a simple, almost rigid, mechanical machinery for the ever-changing flow of experience, and, by the use of that mental mechanism, not only to explain very many phenomena of vast complexity, but also to predict occurrences of similar entanglement and to verify these predictions. the results which have been obtained in the examination of radio-activity, of kathode rays, of spectra at different temperatures, and of phenomena allied to these, bring again into prominence the ancient problem of the structure of what we call matter. is matter fundamentally homogeneous or heterogeneous? chemistry studies the relations between the changes of composition and the changes of properties which happen simultaneously in material systems. the burning fire of wood, coal, or gas; the preparation of food to excite and to satisfy the appetite; the change of minerals into the iron, steel, copper, brass, lead, tin, lighting burning and lubricating oils, dye-stuffs and drugs of commerce; the change of the skins, wool, and hair of animals, and of the seeds and fibres of plants, into clothing for human beings; the manufacture from rags, grass, or wood of a material fitted to receive and to preserve the symbols of human hopes, fears, aspirations, love and hate, pity and aversion; the strange and most delicate processes which, happening without cessation, in plants and animals and men, maintain that balanced equilibrium which we call life; and, when the silver cord is being loosed and the bowl broken at the cistern, the awful changes which herald the approach of death; not only the growing grass in midsummer meadows, not only the coming of autumn "in dyed garments, travelling in the glory of his apparel," but also the opening buds, the pleasant scents, the tender colours which stir our hearts in "the spring time, the only pretty ring time, when birds do sing, ding-a--dong-ding": these, and a thousand other changes have all their aspects which it is the business of the chemist to investigate. confronted with so vast a multitude of never-ceasing changes, and bidden to find order there, if he can--bidden, rather compelled by that imperious command which forces the human mind to seek unity in variety, and, if need be, to create a cosmos from a chaos; no wonder that the early chemists jumped at the notion that there must be, that there is, some _one thing_, some _universal essence_, which binds into an orderly whole the perplexing phenomena of nature, some _water of paradise_ which is for the healing of all disorder, some "well at the world's end," a draught whereof shall bring peace and calm security. the alchemists set forth on the quest. their quest was barren. they made the great mistake of fashioning _the one thing, the essence, the water of paradise_, from their own imaginings of what nature ought to be. in their own likeness they created their goal, and the road to it. if we are to understand nature, they cried, her ways must be simple; therefore, her ways are simple. chemists are people of a humbler heart. their reward has been greater than the alchemists dreamed. by selecting a few instances of material changes, and studying these with painful care, they have gradually elaborated a general conception of all those transformations wherein substances are produced unlike those by the interaction of which they are formed. that general conception is now both widening and becoming more definite. to-day, chemists see a way opening before them which they reasonably hope will lead them to a finer, a more far-reaching, a more suggestive, at once a more complex and a simpler conception of material changes than any of those which have guided them in the past. index air, ancient views regarding, . ---- views of mayow and rey regarding, . alchemical account of changes contrasted with chemical account, . ---- agent, the, . ---- allegories, examples of, , . ---- classification, . ---- doctrine of body, soul, and spirit of things, . ---- doctrine of transmutation, , , , . ---- language, , , , . ---- quest of the one thing, modern form of, . ---- signs, . ---- theory, general sketch of, . alchemists, character of, according to paracelsus, . ---- made many discoveries, . ---- sketches of lives of some, . ---- their use of fanciful analogies, . alchemy, beginnings of, . ---- change of, to chemistry, . ---- contrasted with chemistry, . ---- general remarks on, . ---- lent itself to imposture, . ---- object of, , , , . ---- probable origin of word, . ---- quotations to illustrate aims and methods of, - . alembic, . apparatus and operations of alchemists, . art, the sacred, . atom, meaning given to word by dalton, . atomic theory of greeks, . ---- additions made to, by dalton, . ---- as described by lucretius, . atomic weight, . atoms and electrons, , . bacon's remarks on alchemy, . balsamo, joseph, . basil valentine, his description of the three principles, . ---- his description of the four elements, . ---- some of his discoveries, . becquerel, his discovery of radiation of uranium, . body, soul, and spirit of things, alchemical doctrine of, . boyle, on calcination, . ---- on combustion, . ---- on elements, . ---- on the "hermetick philosophers," . ---- on the language of the alchemists, . ---- on the natural state of bodies, . cagliostro, . calcination, , , , , , , . chaucer's _canon's yeoman's tale_, . chemical conception of material changes, . chemistry, aim of, , , . ---- change from alchemy to, . ---- methods of, . ---- probable origin of word, . classification, alchemical methods of, . colours, lucretius' explanation of differences between, . combustion, . compounds, chemical conception of, . conservation of mass, . curie, her discovery of radium, . dalton's additions to the greek atomic theory, , . democritus, his saying about atoms, . dephlogisticated air, . destruction, thought by alchemists to precede restoration, , . electrons, - , , . elements, alchemical, contrasted with chemical, ; radio-active substances contrasted with, - . ---- the alchemical, , , . ---- the chemical, , , . ---- use of word, by phlogisteans, . essence, the alchemical, , , , , . fire, different meanings of the word, . gates, the alchemical, . gold, considered by alchemists to be the most perfect metal, , . greek thinkers, their atomic theory, . hermes trismegistus, . kathode rays, . language of alchemy, . ---- purposely made misleading, . lavoisier on calcination, , . ---- his use of word _element_, . ---- his use of word _principle_, , _note_. ---- on object of chemistry, . ---- on oxygen, . ---- on systems in science, . ---- on the principle of acidity, , . ---- on the reactions of metals with acids, . ---- on the transmutation of water to earth, . lockyer, on spectra of elements, . lucretius, his theory of nature, . magic, characteristics of, , . material changes, greek theory of, . metals, alchemical connexion between, and plants, . ---- compared by alchemists with vegetables, . ---- mortification of, . ---- seed of, . ---- their desire to become gold, . ---- transmutation of, , , . natural state of bodies, , . oxygen, , . paracelsus, his description of alchemists, . ---- his distinction between natural and artificial mortification, . ---- sketch of life of, . pelican, . perfection, alchemical teaching regarding, , . phlogistic theory, , . phlogiston, , , . priestley, his discovery of oxygen, . principles, the alchemical, , , , , . ---- lavoisier's use of the word, , _note_. radio-active substances, are they elements? , , ; properties of, - . radio-activity, characteristics of, , ; of radium, ; of thorium, ; of uranium, . radium, emanation of, ; heat from, ; rays from, . ramsay, on transmutation of elements, . regimens, the alchemical, . sacred art, the, . scientific theories, general characters of, , . seed, alchemical doctrine of, . seeds of metals, . simplicity, asserted by alchemists to be the mark of nature, , . ---- is not necessarily the mark of verity, . solids, liquids, and gases, atomic explanation of, . stahl, his phlogistic theory, . stone, the philosopher's, , , , , . thorium, radio-activity of, , . transmutation, alchemical doctrine of, , , . ---- character of him who would attempt, . ---- of metals, , , , . ---- of metals into gold, alchemical account of, . ---- of water to earth, . transmutations, apparent examples of, . uranium, radio-activity of, , ; relation of, to radium, , . vegetables compared with metals by alchemists, . water contains hydrogen and oxygen, examination of this phrase, . water, different meanings of the word, , . [transcriber's note: a few typographical errors have been corrected. details are given at the end of the text.] heads of lectures on a course of experimental philosophy, particularly including chemistry, delivered at the new college in hackney. _by joseph priestley, ll.d. f.r.s._ ac. imp. petrop. r. paris. holm. taurin. aurel. med. paris. harlem. cantab. americ. et philad. soc. qui docet discit.--wm. lilly london: printed for j. johnson, no. , st. paul's church-yard. . the preface. situated, as i happily am, in the neighbourhood of the _new college at hackney_, an institution that does honour to the dissenters, an institution open to all persons without distinction[ ], and connected as i am by friendship with the tutors, i was glad to give it every assistance in my power; and therefore undertook to read the _lectures on history and general policy_ which i had composed when i was tutor at warrington, and also to give another course on the subject of _experimental philosophy_. with this view i drew up the following _heads of lectures_; and, to save the students the trouble of transcribing them, they are now printed. to other persons they may serve as a compendious view of the most important discoveries relating to the subject. [footnote : one gentleman of the roman catholic persuasion, and several of the church of england, are now in the college.] as it was found most convenient, with respect to the other business of the college, to confine this course to one lecture in a week, i contrived to bring within that compass as much of the subject of experimental philosophy as i well could, and especially to include the whole of what is called _chemistry_, to which so much attention is now given, and which presents so many new fields of philosophical investigation. besides that the plan of the young gentlemen's studies would not admit of it, i think it most advisable not to trouble beginners with more than a large outline of any branch of science. by this means they are not fatigued by too long an attention to any one subject, a greater variety of articles may be brought before them, and in future life they may pursue any of them as much farther as their inclination may dispose, and their ability and opportunity shall enable, them to do it. i do not give any account of the _experiments_ introduced into the several lectures. they will be sufficiently indicated by the subjects of them. they were as many as i could conveniently make within the time; and where the experiments themselves could not be made, i usually exhibited both the different substances employed in them, and those that were the result of them. as these lectures were calculated for the use of the students at the new college, i prefix an _address to them_, the same in substance with that which i delivered to them at the close of the session of . in it may be seen a specimen of the language we hold to them on the subject of _politics_, which with reasonable men will serve as an answer to the many calumnies that have been thrown out against us, as disaffected to the government of this country. such institutions will, indeed, always be objects of hatred and dread to _bigots_ and the advocates for _arbitrary power_, but the pride of a truly _free country_. i therefore conclude with my earnest prayer (the accomplishment of which the present state of the college does not allow us to doubt) esto perpetua. the dedication. to the students at the new college in hackney. my young friends, having drawn up the following _heads of lectures_ for your use, i take the liberty thus publickly to dedicate them to you; and as i earnestly wish for your improvement and happiness in all respects, excuse me if i take the farther liberty of making a few observations, and giving you some advice, of a more general nature, adapted to your age and circumstances. as you will soon leave this place of education, and enter upon your several professions and employments, i hope your conduct will demonstrate to the world the solid advantages of this institution, and that the great expence attending it, and the best attention of the managers, have not been bestowed in vain. many liberal friends of science, of virtue, and of religion, have contributed to procure you the advantages which you enjoy. they have spared no pains to provide able and careful tutors, and you have had every other advantage for the prosecution of your studies that they could procure you, unclogged by any subscription to articles of faith, or obligation of any other kind, besides such as they have deemed necessary for your own good, and to give the institution its greatest effect. this is an advantage you could not have found elsewhere, at least in this country. and in every seminary of education much more depends upon opportunity for study, free from any obstruction, and undue bias, than upon the ability of tutors; though there is an additional advantage when they are able men, and eminent in the branches of science which they undertake to teach. but this is by no means so essential as many other circumstances. whatever be the qualifications of your tutors, your improvement must chiefly depend upon yourselves. they cannot _think_ or _labour_ for you. they can only put you in the best way of thinking and labouring for yourselves. if, therefore, you get knowledge, you must acquire it by your own industry. you must form all conclusions, and all maxims, for yourselves, from premises and _data_ collected, and considered by yourselves. and it is the great object of this institution to remove every bias the mind can lie under, and give the greatest scope to true freedom of thinking and inquiry. and provided you be intelligent and virtuous men, and good citizens, it will be no cause of regret to the friends of this institution, if, with respect to _religion_, or _politics_, you adopt systems of principles, and maxims of conduct, very different from theirs. give me leave, now that i am addressing you as _young men_, and young _students_, to suggest a caution on a subject, of the importance of which it is hardly possible that you should be sufficiently aware, because it is only impressed by that _experience_ which you have not yet had. i mean that degree of vanity which generally accompanies the acquirements that diligent persons of your age make in places of liberal education, and the contempt they are too apt to entertain for those who have not made the same proficiency with themselves. and i assure you, that in the observations i shall make on this subject, i have no view whatever to any thing that i have observed, or heard, of any of you in particular. but i have been in your situation myself, and i know the importance of these observations to students in general. you are now at an age in which young persons usually make the most sensible advances in knowledge, and in which the understanding appears to ripen the most rapid manner. you are able to say every year, every month, and almost every day, what particular advances you have made, and how much you know more than you did before. and being taught, and accustomed, to express your thoughts in writing, you find yourselves qualified to do this in a manner of which you had no idea, or expectation, but a little time ago. you also perfectly remember what you have so recently learned, and many respects may be more particular and exact than even your tutors themselves. the almost unavoidable effect of this is a high idea of your own powers and attainments, and too often a proportionable contempt of those who, not having had equal advantages, cannot do what you are easily capable of. a certain degree of vanity is, therefore, excusable in young persons; and, indeed, it is by means of it that they are excited to exert themselves in a manner that they would not otherwise have done. but be careful that this temper be not indulged to excess, for it will then be found to have serious ill consequences; the least of which is the precluding future improvement, from being already satisfied with yourselves, and conscious of a sufficient superiority over others. the foundation of this self-conceit, on account of literary attainments, will be found to be extremely weak. in fact, we learn more before the period to which you are now arrived, and i hope you will continue to learn more after it, without its being so much noticed; and the _ability_ that is discovered in the acquirements which are the subjects of this vanity is not greater than appears on other occasions. only they are not so conspicuous. what we all learn in the first three years of our lives, is much more extraordinary in its nature than all that we acquire afterwards. i mean the perfect use of our limbs, and the elements of speech. what we learn in a month in that early period of life, could not, if we were brought up in the ignorance of it, be learned in a year at any subsequent period. but these acquirements being universal, and what the circumstances in which we are all necessarily in compel us to learn, it does not appear extraordinary in any particular individual. also, the proficiency that boys make at a grammar school, in which, in general, the dead languages only are taught (a knowledge of which is commonly the result of severe application) is too common to be the cause of much self-conceit. but the advances that are made at places of liberal education are both less common, and of a more conspicuous nature. you will also find, if you continue your application to study, that it is only the elements of science that you can acquire here, and that if you live many years, they will bear but a small proportion to your future acquirements. but those future acquirements, in consequence of their bearing a less proportion to your whole stock of knowledge, will not be so conspicuous. thus, though all the buildings that in one year are added to such a city as london would make a pretty large country town, they bear so small a proportion to what was built before, that they are not much noticed; whereas, had half the quantity of building been erected in a place where no house had existed before, it would have been a memorable event in the history of the country. also, as in old cities many buildings will fall to decay, while new ones are added; you must expect to forget much of what you now know. no man can give equal attention to every object; and as we advance in life, we, in general, only learn new things at the expence of the old ones. but then they are the more valuable articles of knowledge, the more general and leading principles, which remain with us; while the more useless ones, things to which we give less attention because we find them to be of less use, disappear. yet it is no uncommon thing for ingenious students to despise old scholars who are not so ready in the _minutiæ_ of literature, though they may have forgotten more than those youths ever knew, and may retain what they cannot acquire without forgetting as much. another observation proper to lessen the conceit of literary men, is, that genius is not confined to _them_, but is equally great, though not equally conspicuous, in every other line of life, and especially in manufactures and the arts. here, however, discoveries equal, with respect to _sagacity_, to those of newton, contribute little to posthumous fame, because the discoverers are not writers. but the greatest branch of intellectual excellence with respect to which every other is nothing, and which, from its nature, can never be foundation of any self-conceit, is _virtue_, or right dispositions of mind, leading to right conduct in life. proper sentiments, and just affections of mind, arise from just, and often comprehensive, views of things, past, present, and to come. and if the real greatness of any thought, or action, be estimated by the number of elements that constitute it, and its remoteness from the dictates of sense and natural appetite, a virtuous and pious man will appear to be a much more dignified character, more proper to be viewed with admiration and esteem, than the greatest scholar; discovering, in fact, greater comprehension and force of mind. i mean, however, that virtue which is the result of reflection, of discipline, and much voluntary exertion, which, though operating with equal promptness and facility, is as much superior to mere _innocence_, and what is commonly called _good nature_, as motions secondarily automative are to those that are primarily so; a comparison which you who have studied _hartley's theory of the mind_ will see the force of. these considerations i take the liberty to suggest, as being proper to lessen that vanity which is so incident to those who distinguish themselves in the fields of literature, and which, operating like the acquisition of riches, or power, or any possession that is _rare_ among men, instead of enlarging, may tend to contract the mind, by confining its attention to itself. beginning with a generous emulation, it proceeds to envy and jealousy, and ends in actual hatred and malignity, against which you cannot, surely, be too strongly put upon your guard; this being the greatest depravity to which human nature is subject, and which yet, like any other vice, may be in full possession of the mind, without the person himself knowing, or suspecting it; unless he give more attention to his feelings than most persons do. if no man ever thought himself to be avaricious, or cruel, can it be expected that any person should ever discover that he is too self-conceited? better, however, infinitely better, were it to rank with the merest dunces, than have the conceit and malignity (produced originally from conceit) of some who have distinguished themselves the most as linguists, critics, and poets. even the study of nature, though, from its vast extent, it is less apt to produce this baneful effect, is not always a sufficient guard against it. this is an affecting and an alarming consideration. but in the intellectual, as in the civil and commercial world, we gain nothing but at the risk of some loss; and in this case the possible gain is worth the risk of even this great loss. for when literary, and scientific excellence coincide with that which is of a moral nature, it adds unspeakably to the value of a character. ingenuity coupled with modesty, and great genius with benevolence and true piety, constitute the perfection of human character, and is what we should ever have in view. and a course of education in which both these objects are equally attended to, is the only one that deserves to be called _liberal_: but such as, i hope, you have found this to be. give me leave further to observe to you, that the time that you spend in a place of liberal education is of more importance to you than you can be at present aware of. whatever be the sphere of life for which you are destined, the probability is, that you will hereafter have but little leisure for reading and studying, compared to what you have now. besides, general maxims of all kinds, such as are the foundation of all our future conduct, in morals, religion, or politics, are generally formed at your time of life. from this period expect no great change in your opinions, or conduct; because now it is that you give particular attention to the forming your opinions on all subjects of importance; so that very little that is materially new to you can be expected to occur to you in future life, and almost every thing that you would choose to read will only tend to confirm you in the general principles that you will now adopt. there are, no doubt, exceptions to this, as well as every other general observation; but it is wisdom to suppose, and to act upon the supposition, that we are constituted as the generality of mankind are, and that we shall feel, and act, as they do. since, then, so much depends on the leading principles and maxims which you will now adopt, be it your care to form just and good ones, and let no authority of tutors, or others, have any undue influence over you. in all cases think and judge for yourselves, and especially on all subjects of importance, and with as much attention as you can give to them. it may not be amiss, in the present state of things, to say something respecting another subject, which now commands universal attention. you cannot but be apprised, that many persons entertain a prejudice against this college, on account of the republican, and, as they choose to call them, the licentious, principles of government, which are supposed to be taught here. show, then, by your general conversation, and conduct, that you are the friends of peace and good order; and that, whatever may be your opinions with respect to the best form of government for people who have no previous prejudices or habits, you will do every thing in your power for the preservation of that form of it which the generality of your countrymen approve, and under which you live, which is all that can be reasonably expected of any subject. as it is not necessary that every good son should think his parent the wisest and best man in the world, but it is thought sufficient if the son pay due respect and obedience to his parent; so neither is it to be expected that every man should be of opinion that the form of government under which he happens to be born is the best of all possible forms of government. it is enough that he submit to it, and that he make no attempt to bring about any change, except by fair reasoning, and endeavouring to convince his countrymen, that it is in their power to better their condition in that respect, as well as in any other. think, therefore, speak, and write, with the greatest freedom on the subject of government, particular or general, as well as on any other that may come before you. it can only be avowed tyranny that would prevent this. but at the same time submit yourselves, and promote submission in others, to that form of government which you find to be most approved, in this country, which at present unquestionably is that by _king, lords, and commons_. as to _religion_, we may, surely, be allowed to think and act entirely for ourselves; in all cases obeying god and conscience rather than man. but let us be thankful for the degree of liberty that we are allowed, though it be not all that we are justly entitled to; and let us not use any other means than reason and argument in order to better our condition. by this peaceable and steady conduct we shall at length convince those who will hear reason, that we are entitled to greater consideration; and doubt not but whatever is _true_ and _right_, will finally prevail, and be universally established. that any of your tutors, or any of the friends of this institution, wish to promote reformation, in church or state, by any other means than those of reason, and argument, is a _calumny_, utterly void of foundation, or probability. but your conduct, dispersed as you will soon be in different parts of the country, will be the best means of refuting it. let us leave the method of proceeding by _riot_ and _tumult_ to those persons to whose schemes such proceedings are congenial. truth stands in no need of such support, and will always triumph when assailed by such weapons. in return, then, for the advantages which you have enjoyed in this institution, do it this service; and in recommending it, i trust you are doing substantial service to the cause of liberty and truth; and conferring a most important benefit on your country, and on mankind. contents. lecture i. _the introduction_ lecture ii. _of the properties of all matter_ _of aeriform substances_ lecture iii. _of atmospherical air_ lecture iv. _of dephlogisticated air_ _of phlogisticated air_ lecture v. _of inflammable air_ lecture vi. _of nitrous air_ lecture vii. _of fixed air_ _of hepatic air_ _of phosphoric air_ lecture viii. _of dephlogisticated marine acid air_ _of phlogisticated marine acid air_ lecture ix. _of vitriolic acid air_ _of fluor acid air_ lecture x. _of alkaline air_ _miscellaneous observations relating to air_ lecture xi. _of liquid substances; and first of water_ lecture xii. _of the nitrous acid_ lecture xiii. _of the vitriolic acid_ _of the marine acid_ lecture xiv. _of the vegetable acids, and others of a less perfect nature_ lecture xv. _of the phosphoric acid_ lecture xvi. _of alkalis_ lecture xvii. _of liquid inflammable substances_ _of Æther_ lecture xviii. _of oil_ lecture xix. _of solid substances_ _of calcareous earth_ _of siliceous earth_ lecture xx. _of argillaceous earth_ _of terra ponderosa_ _of magnesia_ lecture xxi. _of ores_ _of gold_ lecture xxii. _of silver_ _of platina_ lecture xxiii. _of mercury_ lecture xxiv. _of lead_ _of copper_ lecture xxv. _of iron_ lecture xxvi. _of tin_ _of the semi-metals_ lecture xxvii. _of nickel_ _of arsenic_ _of cobalt_ _of zinc_ lecture xxviii. _of antimony_ _of manganese_ _of wolfram_ _of molybdena_ _of solid combustible substances_ lecture xxix. _of the doctrine of phlogiston and the composition of water_ lecture xxx. _of heat_ lecture xxxi. _of animal heat_ lecture xxxii. _of light_ lecture xxxiii. _of magnetism_ lecture xxxiv. _of electricity_ lecture xxxv. _the same subject continued_ lecture xxxvi. _the same subject continued_ lectures on experimental philosophy. lecture i. _the introduction._ the object of experimental philosophy is the knowledge of nature in general, or more strictly, that of the properties of natural substances, and of the changes of those properties in different circumstances. this knowledge can only be attained by _experiment_, or _observation_; as that clay is capable of becoming hard by means of fire, and thereby being made into bricks, and that by the same means lime-stone can be converted into quick-lime, and by the addition of water and sand, make mortar. it is by observation also that we discover that stones and other heavy bodies fall to the ground, and that a magnet will attract iron. in other words, experimental philosophy is an investigation of the wisdom of god in the works and _the laws of nature_, so that it is one of the greatest objects to the mind of man, and opens a field of inquiry which has no bounds; every advance we make suggesting new doubts and subjects of farther inquiry. the uniformity we discover in the properties of natural substances enables us to lay down general rules, or principles, which, being invariable, we call the laws of nature; and by our knowledge of these laws we are able to predict, and at our own pleasure to produce, particular results, and this is the source of all the powers of man. it is the direction we acquire of the powers of nature; so that, as lord bacon observed, _knowledge is power_. all arts and manufactures are derived from science. thus the doctrine of _mechanics_ is an application of the law of gravitation. every thing we are capable of doing by means of the steam-engine is derived from our knowledge of the properties of water in steam; all the great effects of gunpowder we owe to our knowledge of the composition, and chemical properties, of that substance. every new appearance in nature is preceded by some new circumstance, and to this, or rather to something always attending it, we say that the appearance is _owing_. this circumstance we therefore call the _cause_, and the new appearance the _effect_ of that cause. thus we say that the union of phlogiston to a particular kind of earth is the cause of its becoming a metal. it is one of the principal rules of philosophizing to admit no more causes than are necessary to account for the effects. thus, if the power of gravity, by which heavy bodies fall to the earth, be sufficient to retain the planets in their orbits, we are authorized to reject the _cartesian vortices_. in other words, we must make no more general propositions than are necessary to comprehend all the particulars contained in them. thus, after having observed that iron consists of a particular kind of earth united to phlogiston, and that it is soluble in acids; and that the same is true of all other metallic substances, we say, universally, that all metals consist of a peculiar earth and phlogiston, and that they are all soluble in some acid. of the circumstances which occasion a change in the properties of bodies, some are the addition of what are properly called _substances_, or things that are the objects of our senses, being _visible_, _tangible_, or having _weight_, &c. thus the addition of an acid changes an alkali into a neutral salt. but other changes are occasioned either by a change of texture in the substance itself, or the addition of something that is not the object of any of our senses. thus, a piece of steel becomes a magnet by the touch of another magnet, and a drop of glass acquires the property of flying asunder by a small fracture, in consequence of falling when red hot into cold water. such also, in the opinion of some, is the difference between hot and cold substances. till the nature of the cause be ascertained, it is convenient to make use of the term _principle_, as including both of the above-mentioned causes of the change of properties in bodies. thus, whatever be the real cause of gravity, or of inflammability, we may speak of the _principle of gravity_, or of _inflammability_; whether, with newton, we suppose gravity to be occasioned by a fluid pervading the whole universe, which he termed _æther_, and whether inflammability be caused by the presence of a real substance called phlogiston, or not. in this manner we use the letters _x_ and _y_ to denote unknown quantities in algebra. when changes are made in substances by the addition of other substances, they make what is called a _chemical union_; and in this case the properties of the compound cannot with any certainty be deduced from those of the component parts, but must be ascertained by fresh experiments. thus, from the specific gravities, or the degrees of fusibility, of two metals, those of the compound cannot be predicted. neither water nor acid of vitriol will separately dissolve iron, so as to produce inflammable air, but both together will do it. however, the properties of similar compounds are similar to one another. thus, all metals dissolved in acids are precipitated by mild alkalis. this chemical union of two substances we ascribe to a certain _elective attraction_, or _affinity_ that subsists between them, in consequence of which they unite with one another whenever a proper opportunity offers, in preference to those substances to which they were before united. thus the vitriolic acid, having a stronger affinity with the vegetable alkali which is the basis of nitre, will unite with that alkali, and with it form another compound, called _vitriolated tartar_, while the acid of nitre, being detached from its base, is collected separately. when two substances compose one liquid, and a third, which has a stronger affinity with either of the two parts than they have with each other, is added to them, it will unite with that part, and take its place in the solution, while the other will in many cases be precipitated, and may be collected. thus the earth of alum is precipitated from a solution of alum by salt of tartar. this is the case of _simple affinity_. when both the substances are compounds, the component parts of which have a weaker affinity with each other than they have with those of the other compound, two new combinations are formed, and this is called a case of _double affinity_. thus when phlogisticated alkali is poured into a solution of green vitriol, the acid of the vitriol unites with the alkali, while the phlogiston joining the calx of iron makes prussian blue. all nature lying open to our investigation, we must consider the different parts in some order. but it is not very material which we adopt, because, begin where we will, the properties of the substances we first treat of will be connected with those which must be particularly considered afterwards, the changes in one substance being occasioned by its union with another. it will be impossible, for example, to explain the properties of metals without considering the _acids_, because by their union with acids very important changes are made in their properties. there have been three principal methods of arranging natural substances. one is according to the _three kingdoms_, as they are called, into which they have been distributed, viz. the _mineral_, the _vegetable_, and the _animal_. another is according to the _elements_ which enter into their composition, and a third according to the _form_ in which they are usually found, viz. _aerial_, _fluid_, or _solid_. upon the whole this last appears to me to be the most convenient, especially as it is easy to intermix general observations concerning the other divisions when they are particularly wanted. as there will be frequent occasion to speak of the component and elementary parts of all substances, i shall here observe, that, according to the latest observations, the following appear to be the elements which compose all natural substances, viz. _dephlogisticated air_, or the _acidifying principle_; _phlogiston_, or the _alkaline principle_; the different _earths_, and the principles of _heat_, _light_, and _electricity_. besides these, there are the following principles which have not been proved to be substances, viz. _attraction_, _repulsion_, and _magnetism_. by the help of these principles we are able, according to the present state of natural knowledge, to explain all the appearances that have yet occurred to us. lecture ii. _of the properties of all matter._ before i consider the properties of particular substances, it will be proper to mention those which are common to them all. but i shall first observe, that the term _substance_ has no proper idea annexed to it, but is merely a convenience in speech; since we cannot speak of the properties of substances, such as _hard_, _round_, _coloured_, &c. &c. (which circumstances alone affect our senses, and thereby give proper ideas) without saying that they inhere in, or belong to, some _thing_, _substance_, or _substratum_. the terms _being_ and _person_ are also in the same predicament. one property of all substances is _extension_, since they all occupy some portion of space. the incapacity of any substance to change its place has been termed, though improperly, the _vis inertiæ_ of matter. it is sufficient to say, that neither this, nor any other effect can be produced without a cause. _infinite divisibility_ is a necessary property of all extended substance; and from this circumstance it will follow, that the smallest quantity of solid matter may be made to fill the largest space, and yet none of the pores shall exceed the smallest given magnitude; and consequently, that, for any thing we know to the contrary, all the bodies in the universe may be comprized in the smallest space. another property usually ascribed to all matter is _impenetrability_, or the necessary exclusion of any substance from the place occupied by another. but the only proof of impenetrability is the _resistance_ that we find to our endeavours to put one substance into the place of another; and it is demonstrated by experiments, that this resistance is not occasioned by the actual contact of the substances, but by a power of repulsion acting at a real distance from their surfaces. it requires a considerable force to bring two solid substances into as near contact as the particles of the same substance; and that _these_ are not in actual contact is evident, from their being capable of being brought nearer by cold; and this is most remarkable with respect to the heaviest, that is, the densest, of all substances, viz. the metals. a more positive argument for the penetrability of matter is, that the particles of light, after entering the densest transparent substance, do not appear to meet with any obstruction to their progress till they come to the opposite side. the powers of _attraction_ and _repulsion_ seem to be common to all matter, and the component parts of all substances are kept in their places by the due balance of those opposite powers. if, by any means, the particles of any substance be removed beyond their sphere of mutual attraction, they repel one another, as those of water when it becomes steam. of the different kinds of attraction, that of _gravitation_ seems to extend to the greatest possible distance; but that which keeps together the parts of the same substance, thence called the _attraction of cohesion_, and the different kinds of chemical attractions, called _affinities_, only act at a small distance. of the causes of these attractions we are entirely ignorant. _of aeriform substances._ aeriform substances, of which the air that we breathe is one, though invisible, are real substances, as appears by their excluding other substances. that the air has _weight_ appears by actually weighing a vessel before and after it is exhausted of air by means of an air-pump (an instrument contrived for that purpose) by its bursting a bladder, and various other experiments. air, being a fluid, presses in all directions, as in the experiment of the fountain in _vacuo_, and others. the weight of the air is the cause of the suspension of mercury in a barometer, and of the action of pumps. the weight of atmospherical air is to that of water in the proportion of about to , so as to press with the weight of about fourteen pounds on every square inch of surface. air, being an elastic fluid, is capable of occupying more or less space according to the pressure which it sustains, as appears by a bladder partially filled with air being expanded when the air is drawn from a receiver in which it is put, by means of the air-pump, and compressed in the condensing engine, an instrument the reverse of the air-pump. air is necessary to the conveyance of sound, to the existence of flame, and to animal life. lecture iii. _of atmospherical air._ the first species of air that offers itself to our consideration is that of the atmosphere, which appears to consist of a mixture of two kinds of air, of different and opposite qualities, viz., dephlogisticated and phlogisticated, in the proportion of about one third of the former to two thirds of the latter. it is by means of the former of these two ingredients that it is capable of supporting flame and animal life. this composition of atmospherical air is proved by several substances absorbing the dephlogisticated air, and leaving the phlogisticated. all these processes have been termed _phlogistic_, because the effect is not produced but by substances supposed to contain phlogiston in a volatile state; and by the affinity between phlogiston and the dephlogisticated part of the air, the one is separated from the other. of these processes are the calcination of metals, a mixture of iron-filings and sulphur, liver of sulphur, the burning of phosphorus, and the effluvia of flowers. in some cases, however, it is not so clear that any thing is emitted from the substance that produces this effect; for water deprived of all air will absorb the dephlogisticated part of the atmospherical in preference to the phlogisticated part. as the purity of atmospherical air, or its fitness for respiration, depends upon the proportion of the dephlogisticated air that it contains, any of the above-mentioned processes will suffice to determine it. the more any given quantity of air is diminished by any of them, the purer it was before the diminution. but this effect is produced the most quickly by a mixture of nitrous air, or firing inflammable air in it, being almost instantaneous. in order to measure the purity of air, it is convenient to take more of the nitrous or inflammable air than is necessary to saturate the dephlogisticated air it contains. equal quantities of each best answer the purpose. supposing a given quantity of atmospherical air to be mixed with an equal quantity of nitrous air, and the residuum to be . measure, the proportion of dephlogisticated and phlogisticated air in it may be found by the following arithmetical operation, it being here taken for granted that one measure of pure dephlogisticated air will saturate two measures of pure nitrous air. . viz. one of each. . the residuum. ----- ) . the quantity that has disappeared. . the dephlogisticated air contained in the measure of the air examined. and this substracted from leaves . for the proportion of phlogisticated air in it. lecture iv. _of dephlogisticated air._ dephlogisticated air, which is one of the component parts of atmospherical air, is a principal element in the composition of acids, and may be extracted by means of heat from many substances which contain them, especially the nitrous and vitriolic; as from nitre, red precipitate, the vitriols, and turbith mineral, and also from these two acids themselves, exposed to a red heat in an earthen tube. this kind of air is also contained in several substances which had attracted it from the atmosphere, as from precipitate _per se_, _minium_, & _manganese_. dephlogisticated air is likewise produced by the action of light upon green vegetables; and this seems to be the chief means employed by nature to preserve the purity of the atmosphere. it is this ingredient in atmospheric air that enables it to support combustion and animal life. by means of it the most intense heat may be produced, and in the purest of it animals will live nearly five times as long as in an equal quantity of atmospherical air. in respiration, part of this air, passing the membrane of the lungs, unites with the blood, and imparts to it its florid colour, while the remainder, uniting with phlogiston exhaled from the venous blood, forms fixed air. it is dephlogisticated air combined with water that enables fishes to live in it. dephlogisticated air is something heavier than atmospherical air, and the purity of it measured by mixing with it two equal quantities of nitrous or inflammable air, deducing the residuum after the diminution from the three measures employed, and dividing the remainder by , as in the process for common air. _of phlogisticated air._ the other ingredient in the composition of atmospherical air is phlogisticated air. it is procured by extracting the dephlogisticated part of the common air, as by the calcination of metals, &c. &c. by dissolving animal substances in nitrous acid, and also by the union of phlogiston with nitrous air, as by heating iron in it, and by a mixture of iron-filings and sulphur. phlogisticated air extinguishes a candle, is entirely unfit for respiration, and is something lighter than common air. it is not capable of decomposition, except by exploding it together with a superabundance of dephlogisticated air, and a quantity of inflammable air, or by taking the electric spark repeatedly in a mixture of it and dephlogisticated air. in these cases nitrous acid is formed. lecture v. _of inflammable air._ inflammable air is procured from all combustible substances by means of heat and water, and from several of the metals, especially iron, zink, and tin, by the vitriolic and marine acids. from oils and spirit of wine it is procured by the electric spark. by the same means also alkaline air is converted into it. that which is procured from metals, especially by steam, is the purest and the lightest, about ten times lighter than common air; in consequence of which, if a sufficient quantity be confined in a light covering, it is possible to make it carry up heavy weights. when it is procured from animal or vegetable substances, it is of a heavier kind, and burns with a lambent flame, of various colours, according to the circumstances. calces of metals heated in inflammable air are revived, and the air absorbed; and since all the metals are revived in the same inflammable air, the principle of metallization, or _phlogiston_, appears to be the same in them all. pure inflammable air seems to consist of phlogiston and water, and the lambent kinds to be the same thing, with the addition of some oily vapour diffused through it. lecture vi. _of nitrous air._ nitrous air is procured by dissolving most of the metals, especially iron, mercury, and copper, in the nitrous acid; but that from mercury seems to be the purest. nitrous air produced from copper contains a mixture of phlogisticated air. some nitrous air is also obtained from the solution of all vegetable substances in nitrous acid; whereas animal substances in the same process yield chiefly phlogisticated air: but in both these cases there is a mixture of fixed air. this species of air is likewise produced by impregnating water with nitrous vapour. this process continues to have this effect after the water becomes blue, but ceases when it turns green; there not then, probably, being a sufficient proportion of water. nitrous air is likewise produced by volatile alkali passing over red hot manganese, or green vitriol, when they are yielding dephlogisticated air. this shews that dephlogisticated air is one ingredient in the composition of nitrous air, and the same thing appears by pyrophorus burning in it. on the contrary, when nitrous air is made to pass over red-hot iron, volatile alkali is produced. nitrous air is completely decomposed by a mixture of about half its bulk of dephlogisticated air, and the produce is nitrous acid. and as nitrous acid is likewise formed by the union of inflammable and dephlogisticated air, one principal ingredient in nitrous air must be common to it and inflammable air, or phlogiston. this air is likewise decomposed by dephlogisticated nitrous acid, which by this means becomes phlogisticated. it is also decomposed by a solution of green vitriol, which by this means becomes black, and when exposed to the air, or heated, emits nitrous air, and recovers its former colour. these decompositions of nitrous air seem to be effected by depriving it of phlogiston, and thereby reducing it to the phlogisticated air originally contained in it. this kind of air is diminished to about one fourth of its bulk by a mixture of iron filings and brimstone, or by heating iron in it, or calcining other metals in it, when the remainder is phlogisticated air. all that iron gets in this process is an addition of weight, which appears to be water, but it loses its phlogiston, so that nitrous air seems to contain more phlogiston, and less water than phlogisticated air. nitrous air and dephlogisticated air will act upon one another through a bladder, but in this case there remains about one-fourth of the bulk of nitrous air, and that is phlogisticated air; so that in this case there seems to be a conversion of nitrous air into phlogisticated air without any addition of phlogiston. nitrous air is decomposed by pyrophorus, and by agitation in olive oil, which becomes coagulated by the process. it is also absorbed by spirit of turpentine, by ether, by spirit of wine, and alkaline liquors. it is imbibed by charcoal, and both that air which is afterwards expelled from it by heat, and that which remains unabsorbed, is phlogisticated air. nitrous air resists putrefaction, but is diminished by the animal substances exposed to it to about a fourth of its bulk, and becomes phlogisticated air. it is likewise fatal to plants, and particularly to insects. when nitrous air is long exposed to iron, it is diminished and brought into a state in which a candle will burn in it, though no animal can breathe it. but this peculiar modification of nitrous air, called _dephlogisticated nitrous air_, is produced with the greatest certainty by dissolving iron in spirit of nitre saturated with copper, impregnating water with this air, and then expelling it from the water by heat. if bits of earthen ware be heated in this dephlogisticated nitrous air, a great proportion of it becomes permanent air, not miscible with water, and nearly as pure as common air, so that the principle of _heat_ seems to be wanting to constitute it permanent air. lecture vii. _of fixed air._ having considered the properties of those kinds of air which are not readily absorbed by water, and therefore may be confined by it, i proceed to those which _are_ absorbed by it, and which require to be confined by mercury. there are two kinds, however, in a middle state between these, being absorbed by water, but not very readily; a considerable time, or agitation, being necessary for that purpose. the first of these is _fixed air_. this kind of air is obtained in the purest state by dissolving marble, lime-stone, and other kinds of mild calcareous earth in any acid. it is also obtained by the burning, or the putrefaction, of both animal and vegetable substances, but with a mixture of both phlogisticated and inflammable air. fixed air is also produced by heating together iron filings and red precipitate; the former of which would alone yield inflammable air, and the latter dephlogisticated. fixed air is therefore a combination of these two kinds of air. another fact which proves the same thing is, that if charcoal of copper be heated in dephlogisticated air, almost the whole of it will be converted into fixed air. on the same principle fixed air is produced when iron, and other inflammable substances, are burned in dephlogisticated air, and also when minium, and other substances containing dephlogisticated air, are heated in inflammable air. that water is an essential part of fixed air is proved by an experiment upon _terra ponderosa aerata_, which yields fixed air when it is dissolved in an acid, but not by mere heat. if steam, however, be admitted to it in that state, it will yield as much fixed air as when it is dissolved in an acid. water absorbs something more than its own bulk of fixed air, and then becomes a proper acid. iron dissolved in this water makes it a proper chalybeate; as without iron it is of the same nature with pyrmont or seltzer water, which by this means may be made artificially. ice will not imbibe this air, and therefore freezing expels it from water. fixed air extinguishes flame, and is fatal to animals breathing in it. also water impregnated with this air is fatal to fishes, and highly injurious to plants. but water thus impregnated will prevent, in a great measure, the putrefaction of animal substances. fixed air thrown into the intestines, by way of glyster, has been found to give relief in some cases of putrid disease. _of hepatic air._ another species of air absorbed by water, but not instantly, is termed _hepatic air_, being produced by the solution of liver of sulphur, or of sulphurated iron, in vitriolic or marine acid. water imbibes about twice its bulk of this kind of air, and it is then the same thing with the sulphureous waters of harrowgate. _of phosphoric air._ phosphoric air is produced by the solution of phosphorus in caustic fixed alkali. if this air be confined by mercury, it will take fire on being admitted to atmospheric, and much more to dephlogisticated air. after agitation in water it loses this property, and the residuum is merely inflammable air, with no great diminution of its bulk. this kind of air, therefore, probably consists of phosphorus dissolved in inflammable air; though it cannot be made by melting it in inflammable air. lecture viii. _of dephlogisticated marine acid air._ this species of air is produced by heating spirit of salt with manganese; or more readily, by pouring acid of vitriol on a mixture of salt and manganese, in the proportion of about of the former to of the latter. in this case the acid of vitriol decomposes the salt, and the marine acid, disengaged in the form of air, takes dephlogisticated air from the manganese; so that this species of air seems to consist of marine acid vapour, and dephlogisticated air. this species of air has a peculiarly pungent smell, and is absorbed by water as readily as fixed air. the water takes about twice its bulk of it; and thereby acquires a yellowish tinge. both this air, and the water impregnated with it, discharges vegetable colours from linen or cotton, and is thereby useful in bleaching. this air when cold coagulates into a yellowish substance. it dissolves mercury, and with it forms _corrosive sublimate_. _of phlogisticated marine acid air._ besides the preceding kinds of air which are slowly absorbed by water, there are others which are absorbed by it very rapidly, so that they cannot be confined but by mercury. of this kind is _phlogisticated marine acid air_, procured by the acid of vitriol and common salt; the former seizing upon the alkaline basis of the latter, and thereby expelling the marine acid in the form of air. it is called _phlogisticated_ to distinguish it from _dephlogisticated marine acid air_, which seems to be the same thing, with the addition of dephlogisticated air. phlogisticated marine acid air is heavier than common air. it extinguishes a candle with a blue flame. it dissolves many substances containing phlogiston, as iron, dry flesh, &c. and thereby forms a little inflammable air. water absorbs times its bulk of this air, and is then the strongest spirit of salt. it absorbs one-sixth more than its bulk of alkaline air, and with it forms the common sal ammoniac. its affinity to water enables it to dissolve ice, and to deprive borax, nitre, and other saline substances, of the water that enters into their composition. lecture ix. _of vitriolic acid air._ vitriolic acid air is procured by heating in hot acid of vitriol almost any substance containing phlogiston, especially the metals which are soluble in that acid, as copper, mercury, &c. this kind of air is heavier than common air, and extinguishes a candle, but without any particular colour of its flame. it will not dislodge the nitrous or marine acids from any substance containing them. by its affinity to water it deprives borax of it. one measure of this air saturates two of alkaline air, and with it forms the vitriolic ammoniac. water imbibes between and times its bulk of this air, and retains it when frozen. water thus impregnated dissolves some metals, and thereby yields inflammable air. if this water be confined in a glass tube, together with common air, and be exposed to a long continued heat, it forms real sulphur, the dephlogisticated part of the common air being imbibed, and forming real vitriolic acid, which uniting with the phlogiston in the air, forms the sulphur. also this air mixed with atmospheric air will, without heat, imbibe some part of it, and thereby become the common acid of vitriol; so that water impregnated with vitriolic acid air, commonly called _sulphureous_, or _phlogisticated acid of vitriol_, wants dephlogisticated air to make it the common acid of of vitriol. this kind of air is imbibed by oils, which thereby change their colour; whale oil becoming red, olive oil of an orange colour, and spirit of turpentine of the colour of amber. if this air be confined in a glass tube by mercury, and the electric spark be taken in it, a black tinge will be given to the glass contiguous to the spark, and this black substance appears to be mercury super-phlogisticated; since by exposure to air it becomes running mercury: so that the vapour of mercury must be diffused through every part of this air, to the distance of at least several feet from the surface of the mercury. _of fluor acid air._ fluor acid air is procured by dissolving the earthy substance called _fluor_ in vitriolic acid. this kind of air extinguishes a candle, and, like vitriolic acid air, one measure of it saturates two of alkaline air. it is peculiar to this kind of air to dissolve glass when it is hot. it seems to consist of a peculiar acid vapour united to the stony substance of the fluor; for water being admitted to it absorbs the acid vapour, and the stony substance is deposited. by this means it exhibits an amusing appearance, whether water be admitted to a glass jar previously filled with that air, or the bubbles of air be admitted, as they are formed, to a quantity of water resting on mercury. lecture x. _of alkaline air._ alkaline air is produced by means of heat from caustic volatile alkali, and also from a mixture of sal-ammoniac and slaked lime, in the proportion of about one-fourth of the former to three-fourths of the latter. in this case the marine acid in the sal-ammoniac unites with the calcareous earth, and the volatile alkali (probably with the assistance of the water) takes the form of air. this species of air is heavier than inflammable air, but lighter than any of the acid airs. like them, however, it dissolves ice, and deprives alum, and some other saline substances, of the water which they contain. united with fixed air, it makes the concrete volatile alkali; with marine acid air, the common sal-ammoniac; and with water, the caustic volatile alkali. the electric spark, or a red heat, converts alkaline air into three times its bulk of inflammable air; and the calces of metals are revived in alkaline, as well as in inflammable air; but there remains about one-fourth of its bulk of phlogisticated air. these facts shew that alkaline air consists chiefly of phlogiston. _miscellaneous observations relating to air._ the _nitrous_ acid may be exhibited in the form of air, as well as the vitriolic, the marine, and the fluor acids. but it cannot be confined even by mercury, which it instantly dissolves. it may, however, in some measure, be confined in a dry glass vessel, from which it will in a great measure expel the common air. this nitrous acid air is that red vapour, which is produced by the rapid solution of bismuth, and some other metals in the nitrous acid. but the vegetable acid cannot be exhibited in the form of air. it is only capable of being converted into vapour, like water: and in the common temperature of our atmosphere, returns to a state of fluidity. different kinds of air which have no affinity to each other, when once mixed together will not separate, notwithstanding any difference of specific gravity. such is the case of a mixture of inflammable and dephlogisticated air, and even of inflammable and fixed air. without this property also, the phlogisticated air, which constitutes the greatest part of our atmosphere, being specifically lighter than dephlogisticated air, of which the other part of it consists, would separate from it, and ascend into the higher regions of the atmosphere. inflammable air, however, will not mix with acid or alkaline air. different kinds of air are expanded differently by the same degrees of heat; dephlogisticated air the least, and alkaline air the most. if any fluid, as water, spirit of wine, or even mercury, be heated in a porous earthen vessel, surrounded by any kind of air, the vapour of the fluid will pass through the vessel _one_ way, while the air passes the _other_; and when the operation ceases, with respect to the _one_, it likewise ceases with respect to the _other_. lecture xi. _of liquid substances_; and first of _water_. having considered all the substances that are usually found in the form of _air_, i come to those that are generally in a _fluid_ form, beginning with _water_, which is the principal, if not the only cause of fluidity to all the other substances that i shall place in this class. pure water is a liquid substance, transparent, without colour, taste, or smell; and with different degrees of heat and cold may be made to assume the three forms of a solid, of a fluid, and of air. below ° of fahrenheit it is ice, and above ° it is vapour; so that in an atmosphere below ° it never could have been known to be any thing else than a peculiar kind of stone, and above ° a peculiar species of air. in passing from the state of a solid to that of a liquid, water absorbs a great quantity of the principle, or matter, of _heat_, which remains in it in a _latent_ state; and in passing from a state of fluid to that of vapour, it absorbs much more; and this heat is found when the processes are reversed. it has been observed, that when water becomes vapour, it takes the form of small globules, hollow within, so as to be specifically lighter than air. the degree of heat at which water is converted into vapour depends upon the pressure of the atmosphere; so that in vacuo, or on the top of a high mountain, it boils with little heat; and when compressed, as in papin's digester, or in the bottom of a deep pit, it requires much heat. in the former case the restoring of the pressure will instantly put a stop to the boiling, and in the latter case the removing of the pressure will instantly convert the heated water into vapour. the ease with which water is converted into vapour by heat, has given a great power to mechanicians, either by employing the natural pressure of the atmosphere, when steam is condensed under a moveable pistern, in an iron cylinder, which was the principle of the old fire-engine, or by employing the elastic power of steam to produce the same effect, which is the principle of mr. watt's steam engine. water was long thought to be incompressible by any external force, but mr. canton has shewn that even the pressure of the atmosphere will condense it very sensibly. we do not know any external force equal to that by which water is expanded when it is converted into ice, or into vapour. for though the particles of water approach nearer by cold, yet when it crystallizes, the particles arrange themselves in a particular manner, with interstices between them; so that, on the whole, it takes up more room than before. water has an affinity to, and combines with, almost all natural substances, aerial, fluid, or solid; but most intimately with acids, alkalies, calcareous earth, and that calx of iron which is called _finery cinder_, from which the strongest heat will not expel it. it has been supposed by some, that by frequent distillation, and also by agitation, water may be converted into a kind of earth; but this does not appear to be the case. it has also of late been thought, that water is resolvable into dephlogisticated and inflammable air; but the experiments which have been alleged to prove this do not satisfy me; so that, for any thing that appeared till very lately, water might be considered as a simple element. by means of heat, however, it seems to be resolvable into such air as that of which the atmosphere consists, viz. dephlogisticated and phlogisticated, only with a greater proportion of the former. water, with respect to specific gravity and temperature, has generally been made the standard to all other substances; its freezing and boiling points being the limits by means of which thermometers are graduated. other substances have also been compared with water, as a standard, with respect to the capacity of receiving heat, and retaining it in a latent state, as will be shewn when we consider the subject of heat. lecture xii. _of the nitrous acid._ under the head of _liquids_ i shall consider _acids_ and _alkalis_, though some of them may be exhibited in the form of air, and others in a solid form. these two chemical principles are formed to unite with one another, and then they constitute what is called a _neutral salt_. both acids and alkalis are distinguishable by their taste. another test, and more accurate, is, that acids change the blue juices of vegetables red, and alkalis turn the syrup of violets green. acids are generally distinguished according to the three kingdoms to which they belong, viz. _mineral_, _vegetable_, and _animal_. the mineral acids are three, the _nitrous_, the _vitriolic_, and the _marine_. the nitrous acid is formed by the union of the purest inflammable air, or the purest nitrous air, with dephlogisticated air. but it is usually procured from nitre by means of the vitriolic acid, which, seizing its base, expels the nitrous acid in a liquid form. on this account this acid is said to be weaker than the vitriolic. if the nitrous acid be made to pass through a red-hot earthen tube, it will be decomposed, and the greatest part of it be converted into dephlogisticated air. like all other acids, the nitrous acid has a strong affinity to water; but it is not capable of so much concentration as the vitriolic. it is generally of an orange or yellow colour; but heat will expel this colour in the form of a red vapour, which is the same acid in the form of air, and loaded with phlogiston; and therefore when it is colourless it is said to be dephlogisticated. but the colourless vapour exposed to heat, or to light, will become coloured again; and the liquid acid imbibing this coloured vapour, becomes coloured as before. this acid tinges the skin of a yellow colour, which does not disappear till the epidermis be changed. the nitrous acid unites with phlogiston, alkalis, metallic substances, and calcareous earth. by means of its affinity with phlogiston it occasions that rapid accension called _detonation_, when any salt containing this acid, especially nitre, is applied to hot charcoal, or when charcoal is put to hot nitre. in fact, the charcoal burns so rapidly by means of the dephlogisticated air supplied by the nitre. a mixture of sulphur assists the accension of these substances, and makes gunpowder, in the explosion of which much nitrous or phlogisticated air is suddenly produced, and expanded by the heat. the application of this force, both to useful and destructive purposes, is well known. if, instead of nitre, a salt made with dephlogisticated marine acid be made use of, the explosion is more easily produced, and is much more violent. friction will do this as well as heat. nitre also enters into the composition of _pulvis fulminans_, viz. three parts nitre, two of dry alkali, and one of sulphur. this composition melts, and yields a blue flame, before it explodes. by means of the affinity of the nitrous acid to _oil_, another substance containing phlogiston, it is capable of producing not only a great heat, but even a sudden flame, especially when mixed with a little vitriolic acid. nitrous acid dissolves all metallic substances except gold and platina, and in the solution nitrous air is produced. the particular kinds of saline substances formed by the union of the nitrous acid with the several metals and earths may be seen in tables constructed for the purpose. they are all deliquescent. lecture xiii. _of the vitriolic acid._ the vitriolic acid, so called because it was originally procured from _vitriol_, is now generally procured from sulphur; the dephlogisticated part of the air uniting with it in the act of burning. that dephlogisticated air is essential to this acid is evident from the decomposition of it; for if the vapour of it be made to pass through a red-hot earthen tube, a great quantity of dephlogisticated air is procured. this acid has a strong affinity to water, with which it unites with much heat; and it is capable of greater concentration, or of being made specifically heavier, than any other acid. when pure, it is entirely free from colour and smell, owing, probably, to its being free from phlogiston, which is inseparable from the nitrous or marine acids. the vitriolic acid will dislodge the nitrous, or marine, or any other acid, from their earthy or metallic bases; from which property it is called the strongest of all the acids. by means of the superior affinity of the vitriolic acid to earths, and especially to _terra ponderosa_, the smallest quantity of it in water may be discovered by a solution of this earth in the marine acid. in this acid the terra ponderosa is held in perfect solution; but with the vitriolic acid it forms a substance that is insoluble in water, and therefore it instantly appears in the form of a white cloud. perhaps chiefly from the strong affinity which this acid has with water, _pyrophorus_, consisting of a mixture of alum and several substances containing phlogiston, takes fire spontaneously on exposure to the air. it is commonly made of three parts of alum and one of brown sugar, or of two parts alum, one of salt of tartar, and one of charcoal. they must be heated till they have for some time emitted a vapour that burns with a blue flame. the saline substances produced by the union of this acid with the several earths and metals, are best exhibited in tables constructed for the purpose. when united to three of the metals, viz. iron, copper, and zinc, they are called _vitriols_, green, blue, and white. and all the substances which this acid unites with crystallize, and do not deliquesce. this acid unites with oil, and the mixture is always black. when any substance containing phlogiston is heated in the vitriolic acid, another species of the acid, called _sulphureous_, is formed, of a pungent smell. in reality, it is water impregnated with vitriolic acid air. it makes, however, a distinct species of acid, and is dislodged from its base by most of the others. _of the marine acid._ the marine acid is procured from common salt by the vitriolic acid, which unites with its base, the fossil alkali. this acid is generally of a straw-colour; but this is owing to an impregnation with some earthy matter, most of which it readily dissolves, especially the metallic ones. it is less capable of concentration than the vitriolic or nitrous acids, perhaps from a more intimate union of phlogiston with it. no heat can extract from it any dephlogisticated air. though this is denominated a weaker acid than the nitrous, yet it will take silver, lead, or mercury, from their union with the nitrous acid. upon this principle, a solution of these metals in the nitrous acid will readily discover whether any water contains the marine acid, the latter uniting with the metal dissolved in the former, and forming with it, if it be silver, a _luna cornea_; which being a substance insoluble in water, discovers itself by a cloudy appearance. the union of the marine acid with earths forms salts that easily deliquesce, but with the metals such as are capable of crystallization; and so also is that formed by the union of this acid to terra ponderosa. neither this acid nor the nitrous will dissolve gold or platina; but a mixture of them, called _aqua regia_, will do it. the marine acid has a strong affinity to dephlogisticated air, and will take it from manganese and other substances; and with this union it becomes a different acid, called _dephlogisticated marine acid_, being water impregnated with dephlogisticated marine acid air, described above. lecture xiv. _of the vegetable acids, and others of a less perfect nature._ the principal of the vegetable acids are the _acetous_ and the _tartareous_. the acetous acid is the produce of a peculiar fermentation of vegetable substances, succeeding the _vinous_, in which ardent spirit it is procured, and succeeded by the _putrefactive_, in which volatile alkali is generated. thus wine is converted into vinegar. crude vinegar, however, contains some ingredient from the vegetable substances from which it was procured: but distillation separates them, and makes the vinegar colourless; though some of the acid is lost in the process. the acetous acid is concentrated by frost, which does not affect the proper acid, but only the water with which it is united. it may likewise be concentrated by being first combined with alkalies, earths, or metals, and then dislodged by a stronger acid, or by mere heat. thus the acetous acid, combined with vegetable alkali, forms a substance that is called the _foliated earth of tartar_; and it may be expelled from it by the vitriolic acid. when combined with copper it makes _verdigris_; and from this union heat alone will expel it in a concentrated state. the acetous acid thus concentrated is called _radical vinegar_. still, however, it is weaker than any of the preceding mineral acids. several vegetables, as lemons, sorrel, and unripe fruit, contain acids, ready formed by nature, mixed with some of the essential oil of the plants, which gives them their peculiar flavours. all these acids have peculiar properties; but it is not necessary to note them in this very general view of the subject. like vinegar, these acids may be concentrated by frost, and also by a combination with other substances, and then expelled by a stronger acid. the _acid of tartar_ is very similar to that of vinegar. tartar, from which it is procured, is a substance deposited on the inside of wine-casks, though it is also found ready formed in several vegetables. it consists of the vegetable alkali and this peculiar acid. when refined from its impurities, it is called _crystals_, or _cream of tartar_. the acid is procured by mixing the tartar with chalk, or lime, which imbibes the superfluous acid, and this is expelled by the acid of vitriol. or it may be procured by boiling the tartar with five or six times its weight of water, and then putting the acid of vitriol to it. this unites with the vegetable alkali, and forms vitriolated tartar; and the pure acid of tartar may be procured in crystals, by evaporation and filtration, equal in weight to half the cream of tartar. this acid of tartar is more soluble in water than the cream of tartar. this acid, united to the mineral alkali, makes _rochelle salt_. every kind of wood, when distilled, or burned, yields a peculiar acid; and it is the vapour of this acid that is so offensive to the eyes in the smoke of wood. a peculiar acid is obtained from most vegetable substances, especially the farinaceous ones, and from sugar, by distillation with the nitrous acid. this seizes upon the substance with which the acid was united, and especially the phlogiston adhering to it, and then the peculiar _acid of sugar_ crystallizes. thus with three parts of sugar, and thirty of nitrous acid, one part of the proper acid of sugar may be obtained. by the same process an acid may be procured from camphor. the _bark of oak_, and some other vegetable substances, especially nut-galls, contain a substance which has obtained the name of _the astringent principle_; the peculiar property of which is, that it precipitates solutions of iron in the form of a black powder, and in this manner _ink_ is made. but by solution in water and evaporation, crystals, which are a proper _acid of galls_, may be obtained. _amber_ is a hard semitransparent substance, chiefly found in prussia, either dug out of the earth, or thrown up by the sea. it is chiefly remarkable for its electrical property; but by distillation in close vessels there sublimes from it a concreted acid, soluble in times its weight of cold water. amber seems to be of vegetable origin, and to consist of an oil united to this peculiar acid. the acids i shall mention next are of a mineral origin; but being of a less perfect nature as acids, i shall only just note them here. _borax_ is a substance chiefly found in a crystallized state in some lakes in the east indies. it consists of the mineral alkali and a peculiar acid, which may be separated, and exhibited in white flakes, by putting acid of vitriol to a solution of it in water. this acid has been called _sedative salt_, from its supposed uses in medicine. it is an acid that requires fifty times its weight of water to dissolve it. several other mineral substances, as _arsenic_, _molybdena_, _tungsten_, and _wolfram_, in consequence of being treated as the preceding vegetables ones, have been lately found to yield peculiar acids. they are also produced in a concrete state, and require a considerable proportion of water to make them liquid; but as the water in which they are dissolved turns the juice of litmus red, and as they also unite with alkalis, they have all the necessary characteristics of acids. lecture xv. _of the phosphoric acid._ the most important acid of _animal_ origin, though it has lately been found in some mineral substances, is the _phosphoric_. phosphorus itself is a remarkable substance, much resembling sulphur, but much more inflammable. it has been procured chiefly, till of late, from urine, but now more generally from _bones_, by means of the vitriolic acid, which unites with the calcareous earth of which bones consist, and sets at liberty the phosphoric acid, or the base of that acid, with which it was naturally combined. the acid thus procured, mixed with charcoal, and exposed to a strong heat, makes phosphorus. this substance burns with a lambent flame in the common temperature of our atmosphere, but with a strong and vivid flame if it be exposed to the open air when moderately warm. in burning it unites with the dephlogisticated air of the atmosphere, and in this manner the purest phosphoric acid is produced. this acid is also procured in great purity by means of the nitrous or vitriolic acids, especially the former, which readily combines with the phlogiston of the phosphorus, and thus leaves the acid pure. in this process phlogisticated air is produced. this acid is perfectly colourless, and when exposed to heat loses all its water, and becomes a glassy substance, not liable to be dissipated by fire, and readily uniting with earths. united to the mineral alkali, it forms a neutral salt, lately introduced into medicine. united to the mineral and vegetable alkalis naturally contained in urine, it has obtained the name of _microcosmic salt_, frequently used as a flux for mineral substances with a blow-pipe. besides the phosphoric, there are other acids of an animal origin; as that of _milk_, that of _sugar of milk_, that of the _animal calculus_, and that of _fat_. the acid of milk is the sour whey contained in butter-milk, which, by a tedious chemical process, may be obtained pure from any foreign substance. the sugar of milk is procured by evaporating the whey to dryness, then dissolving it in water, clarifying it with whites of eggs, and evaporating it to the consistence of honey. in this state white crystals of the acid of sugar of milk will be obtained. by distilling these crystals with nitrous acid, other crystals of the proper _acid of sugar of milk_ will be obtained, similar to those of the acid of sugar. if the human calculus be distilled, it yields a volatile alkali, and something sublimes from it which has a sourish taste, and therefore called the _acid of the calculus_. it is probably some modification of the phosphoric acid. animal fat yields an acid by distillation, or by first combining it with quick-lime, and then separating it by the vitriolic acid. siliceous earth is corroded by this acid. lecture xvi. _of alkalis._ the class of substances that seems particularly formed by nature to unite with acids, and thereby form _neutral salts_, are the _alkalis_. they have all a peculiar acrid taste, not easily defined. they change the blue juices of vegetables green, or purple, and in common with acids have an affinity with water, so as to be capable of being exhibited in a liquid form; though when this water is expelled by heat, some of them will assume a solid form. alkalis are of two kinds; the _fixed_, which have no smell, and the _volatile_ which have a pungent one. the fixed alkalis are of _vegetable_ or _mineral_ origin. when in a solid form, they both melt with a moderate heat, and uniting with earthy substances, make _glass_. with an intense heat they are volatilized. vegetable alkali is procured by burning plants, and lixiviating the ashes; a purer kind by the burning of tartar, hence called _salt of tartar_; but the purest of all is got by the deflagration of nitre; the charcoal uniting with the acid as it assumes the form of dephlogisticated air, and the alkali being left behind. mineral alkali is found in ashes of sea-weed. it is likewise the basis of sea-salt; from which it is separated by several processes, but especially by the calx of lead, which has a stronger affinity with the marine acid with which it is found combined. alkalis united with fixed air are said to be _mild_, and when deprived of it _caustic_, from their readiness to unite with, and thereby _corrode_, vegetable and animal substances. to render them caustic, they are deprived of their fixed air by quick-lime; and in this state they unite with oils, and make _soap_. alkalis have a stronger affinity with acids than metals have with them; so that they will precipitate them from their solutions in acid menstruums. the vegetable fixed alkali has a strong attraction to water, with which it will become saturated in the common state of our atmosphere, when it is said to _deliquesce_; and having the appearance of _oil_, the salt of tartar is thus said to become _oil of tartar per deliquium_. on the other hand, the mineral, or fossil alkali, is apt to lose its water in a dry atmosphere, and then it is said to _effloresce_. in this state it is often found on old walls. volatile alkali is procured by burning animal substances; in egypt (from whence, as contained in _sal ammoniac_, we till of late imported it) from camel's dung; but now from bones, by distillation. to the liquor thus procured they add vitriolic acid, or substances which contain it. this acid unites with the alkali, and common salt being put to it, a double affinity takes place. the vitriolic acid uniting with the mineral alkali of the salt, makes _glauber salt_, and the marine acid uniting with the volatile alkali, makes _sal ammoniac_. slaked lime added to this, unites with the marine acid of the ammoniac, and sets loose the volatile alkali in the form of _alkaline air_, which combining with water, makes the liquid caustic volatile alkali. if chalk (containing calcareous earth united with fixed air) be mixed with the sal ammoniac, heat will make the calcareous earth unite with the marine acid, while the fixed air of the chalk will unite with the volatile alkali, and assume a solid form, being the _sal volatile_ of the apothecaries. lecture xvii. _of liquid inflammable substances._ of liquid inflammable substances the principal is _spirit of wine_, sometimes called _ardent spirit_, and, when highly rectified, _alcohol_. it is obtained from vegetable substances by their going through the vinous fermentation. it is considerably lighter than water, colourless, and transparent, has a peculiar smell and taste, and the property of inebriating. ardent spirit seems to consist of a peculiar combination of phlogiston and water; for when the vapour of it is made to pass through a red-hot earthen tube, it is resolved into water and inflammable air. it is highly inflammable, and burns without smoke, or leaving any residuum; and in the act of burning its phlogiston so unites with dephlogisticated air as to make fixed air. ardent spirit mixes readily with water in all proportions, and also with essential oils, and balsams or resins, which are the same thing inspissated. by its affinity with essential oils, ardent spirit extracts them froth aromatic plants; and these liquors have obtained the name of _tinctures_. when the tinctures are distilled, the more volatile parts of the essential oils, which come over in distillation, have acquired the name of _waters_; as _lavender water_, _rosemary water_, &c. and what remains in the still is called the _extract_ of the plant. if the tinctures be diluted with much water, the resinous part of the plant will be obtained pure, and separated from the extractive part, which will remain dissolved in the water, while the resin separates from it. spirit of wine will not dissolve the gummy parts of vegetables; and by this means the gummy substances may be separated from their solutions in water, the spirit uniting with the water only. on the other hand, if resins be dissolved in spirit of wine, the affusion of water will separate them. by means of the affinity of spirit of wine with water, it will seize upon the water in which several salts are dissolved, and thus produce an instant crystallization of them. salt of tartar has a greater affinity to water than spirit of wine, and by extracting water from it, will assist in concentrating it; but the best method of rendering spirit wine free from water is distillation, the ardent spirit rising before the water. spirit of wine mixed with the vitriolic and other mineral acids, renders them milder, and thereby more proper for certain medicinal uses. this is called _dulcifying_ them. spirit of wine is a powerful antiseptic, and is therefore of use to preserve vegetable and animal substances from putrefaction. _of Æther._ if spirit of wine be distilled with almost any of the acids, the produce is a liquor which has obtained the name of _Æther_, from its extreme lightness and volatility, being much lighter, and more volatile, than any other fluid that we are acquainted with. it is highly inflammable, but the burning of it is accompanied with smoke, and some soot; and on this account it is a medium between spirit of wine and oil, the acid having taken from the spirit of wine part of the water that was essential to it, at the same time that it communicated something of its acid peculiarly modified; since æthers have different properties according to the acids by which they are made; as the _vitriolic_, the _nitrous_, the _marine_, and the _acetous_. no æther, however, can be made from the marine acid till it has been in some measure dephlogisticated; from which it may be inferred, that dephlogisticated air is necessary to the composition of æther. vitriolic æther is the most common, in consequence of the process by which it is made being the easiest. Æther does not mix with water in all proportions, like spirit of wine, but ten parts of water will take up one of æther. it easily mixes with all oils. it is something remarkable, that though æther will not dissolve gold, it will take from aqua regia the gold that has been previously dissolved in it. by the quick evaporation of æther a considerable degree of cold may be procured; and on this principle it has sometimes been applied to relieve the head-ach and other pains. lecture xviii. _of oil._ oil is a liquid inflammable substance, of great tenacity, disposed to pour in a stream rather than in drops. it is little, if at all, soluble in water. it burns with smoke and soot, and leaves a residuum of a coaly substance. it consists of acid and water combined with phlogiston. all oil is the produce of the vegetable or animal kingdom, no proper mineral substance containing any of it. by distillation oil is in part decomposed, and by this means the thicker kinds of oil are rendered thinner and more volatile, the acid, to which their consistence is chiefly owing, being lost in the process. by repeated distillation it is supposed that all oils may be brought almost to the state of æther, and even of ardent spirit. acids act powerfully upon oils, but very differently, according to the nature of each. alkalies also combine with oils, and the less thin and volatile they are, the more easily are they soluble in alkalies. the union of alkali and oil makes _soap_. all oil dissolves sulphur, and with it makes what is called a _balsam_. oils also dissolve metallic substances, but most sensibly copper and lead. united with the calx of lead, it is used in painting. oil not readily mixing with water, it will diffuse itself over its surface, and, notwithstanding its tenacity, it will do this very rapidly, and to a great extent; and then it has the extraordinary effect of preventing the action of the wind upon the water, so as to prevent the forming of waves. if a quantity of oil and water be put into a glass vessel and swung, the surface of the water below the oil will be seen to change with respect to the vessel, but not that of the oil. if spirit of wine be put upon them, that will be at rest, and both the lower fluids in motion. vegetable oil is of two kinds, the _soft_, or _mild_, which has little or no taste or smell, and the _essential_ oil, which is thin, and retains the smell and taste of the plant from which it was extracted. mild or sweet oil is expressed from the grains or kernels of vegetables, and requires a considerable degree of heat to convert it into vapour, in which state alone it is capable of being inflamed. _essential oil_ is volatile in the heat of boiling water, and is generally obtained by means of distillation from the most odoriferous sorts of plants; but is sometimes found in their vesicles, as in the rind of an orange. the strong taste of this kind of oil arises from the disengaged acid which abounds in it; and by this means it is soluble in spirit of wine, which sweet oil is not; but it loses much of this property by repeated distillations. by long exposure to the air it loses its more volatile parts, and thereby approaches to the nature of a resin. this volatile odoriferous principle has been called the _spiritus rector_ of the plant. the essential oils of different plants differ much in their specific gravity, and also in the manner by which they are affected by cold, some being heavier and others lighter than water, and some being more difficultly, and others more easily, congealed. though the differences with respect to _weight_ and _consistency_ in these oils is probably owing to the state of the acid that is combined with them, these two properties are wholly independent of each other; some essential oils being very thin and yet heavy, and others thick and yet light. essential oils are used in perfumes, and also in medicine, acting powerfully the nervous system. essential oils are very apt to be adulterated. if it be with sweet oil, it may be discovered by evaporation on white paper, or by a solution in spirit of wine, which will not act upon the sweet oil. if spirit of wine be mixed with it, it will be discovered by a milky appearance upon putting water to it, which uniting with the spirit, will leave the oil much divided. if oil of turpentine, which is the cheapest of essential oils, be mixed with any of the more valuable kinds, it will be discovered by evaporation; a strong smell of turpentine being left on the paper, or cloth, upon which the evaporation was made. animal oil, like the vegetable, is of two kinds; the first _butter_, or _fat_, which is easily congealed, owing to the quantity of acid that is intimately combined with it. it resembles the sweet oil of vegetables in having no smell or taste. the other kind of animal oil is extracted by distillation from the flesh, the tendons, the bones, and horns, &c. of animals. it differs essentially from the other kind of animal oil, by containing an alkali instead of an acid. by repeated distillation it becomes highly attenuated and volatile; and in this state it is called the _oil of dippel_, the discoverer of it. all oil exposed to much heat is in part decomposed, and acquires a disagreeable smell; and in this state it is said to be _empyreumatic_: but this property is lost by repeated distillations. besides the vegetable and animal oils above described, there is a fossil oil called _bitumen_, the several kinds of which differ much in colour and consistence; the most liquid is called _petroleum_, from being found in the cavities of rocks, and the more solid kinds are _amber_, _jet_, _asphaltum_, and _pit-coal_. when distilled, the principal component parts of all these substances are an oil and an acid. but all fossil oil is probably of vegetable or animal origin, from masses of vegetables or animals long buried in the earth. their differences from resins and other oily matters are probably owing to _time_; the combinations of mineral acids and oils so nearly resembling bitumens, the principal difference being their insolubility in spirit of wine. that the most solid of these, as amber, has been formerly in a liquid state, is evident, from insects and other substances being frequently found in them; and pit-coal has been often found with both the internal texture and external appearance of wood; so that strata of pit-coal have probably been beds of peat in some former state of the earth. lecture xix. _of solid substances._ all solid substances are capable of becoming fluid by heat, and most of them may thereby be reduced into a state of vapour, or air; and in passing from a fluid into a solid state their component parts assume a particular mode of arrangement, called _crystallization_, which differs according to the nature of the substance; so that all solids, especially if they be suffered to concrete slowly, may be called _crystals_. exclusive of _salts_, which have been considered already, as formed by the union of acids and alkalis, solids in general have obtained the names of _earths_, or _stones_, which differ only in their texture; and they are distinguished into those that are _metallizable_, or those that are not; the former being called _ores_, and the latter simply _earths_; the principal of which are the _calcareous_, _siliceous_, _argillaceous_, _magnesia_, _terra ponderosa_, and a few others which have been discovered lately, but have not been much examined. _of calcareous earth._ calcareous earth is found in the shells of fishes, the bones of animals, chalk, lime-stone, marble, and gypsum: but all calcareous earth is supposed to be of animal origin; and beds of chalk, lime-stone, or marble, are thought to have been beds of shells formed in the sea, in some pristine state of the earth. the calcareous earth which is found in shells, lime-stone, and marble, is combined with fixed air, discovered by effervescing with acids. to obtain it perfectly pure, the earth must be pounded and washed with water, in order to free it from any saline substance which may be contained in it, then dissolved in distilled vinegar, and precipitated by mild alkalies. lime-stone exposed to heat loses about half its weight, in fixed air and water, and the remainder, called _quick-lime_, attracts water very powerfully, and their union is attended with much heat, after which it dissolves into a fine powder called _slaked lime_. if it be left exposed to the atmosphere, it will of itself, by gradually imbibing moisture, fall into the state of powder. water dissolves about one seven hundredth part of its weight of quick-lime, and is then called _lime-water_. exposed to the air, a crust will be formed on its surface, which is found to consist of calcareous earth and fixed air. lime and water mixed with sand make _mortar_, by which means different stones may be made to cohere as one mass, which is the most valuable use of this kind of earth. calcareous earth, united with vitriolic acid, makes _gypsum_; and this substance pounded and exposed to heat, parts with its water, and is then called _plaister of paris_. in this state, by imbibing water again, it becomes a firm substance, and thus is useful in making moulds, &c. the earth of animal bones is calcareous united to the phosphoric acid. _of siliceous earth._ siliceous earth seems to be formed by nature from chalk, perhaps by the introduction of some unknown acid, which the vitriolic acid is not able to dislodge. it abounds in most substances which are hard enough to strike fire with steel, as _flint_, _rock crystal_, and most _precious stones_. it is not acted upon by any acid except the fluor and phosphoric, but especially the former: but it is soluble in alkalies; and being then dissolved in water, makes _liquor silicum_, from which the purest siliceous earth may be precipitated by acids. for this purpose about four times the weight of alkali must be made use of. with about equal weights of alkali and siliceous sand is made _glass_, of so great use in admitting light and excluding the weather from our houses, as well as for making various useful utensils. to make glass perfectly colourless, and at the same time more dense, commonly called _flint glass_, manufacturers use a certain proportion of calx of lead and manganese. siliceous earth is not affected by the strongest heat, except by means of a burning lens, or dephlogisticated air. lecture xx. _of argillaceous earth._ argillaceous earth is found in _clay_, _schistus_, or _slate_, and in _mica_; but the purest is that which is precipitated from a solution of alum by alkalies; for alum consists of the union of vitriolic acid and argillaceous earth. this species of earth is ductile with water; it then hardens and contracts by heat, so as to be of the greatest use in forming _bricks_, or stones of any required form or size. by means of the property of clay to contract in the fire, mr. wedgwood has constructed an excellent thermometer to measure the degrees of extreme heat. the ductility of clay seems to depend upon some acid, probably the vitriolic, adhering to it; for it loses that property when it is burned into a brick, but recovers it when it has been again dissolved in an acid. _of terra ponderosa._ _terra ponderosa_, or _marmor metallicum_, is generally found in two states, viz. united to vitriolic acid, when it is called _calk_, or to fixed air, when it is called _terra ponderosa aerata_. to obtain it pure from its union with the vitriolic acid, it must be melted with about twice its weight of fixed alkali; which unites with the acid, and forming a saline substance, may be washed out of it. in this state it contains water, and therefore, when exposed to heat, will yield fixed air; whereas the terra ponderosa aerata will not yield fixed air by heat only, but when steam is made to pass over it when red hot. this proves that water is essential to the composition of fixed air. this stone is distinguishable by its great specific gravity, being four times as heavy as water; but though in this it resembles an _ore_, it has not been found to be metallizable. _of magnesia._ this species of earth is found in _steatites_, or _soap rock_, _spanish chalk_, _asbestus_, and _muscovy talck_; but the purest is got by dissolving _epsom salts_ (which consists of this earth united to the vitriolic acid) and precipitating it by a mild alkali. in this state it becomes united to fixed air, which may be expelled by heat. it is then _calcined_, or _caustic_, but differs from quick-lime by not being soluble in water. _asbestus_, which contains much of this kind of earth, is remarkable for not being destructible by heat, though it is sometimes found in flexible fibres, so as to be capable of being woven into cloth. _muscovy talck_ is remarkable for the thin and transparent flakes into which it is divisible, and thereby capable of various uses. there are some other distinct species of earth, particularly one brought from botany bay, and another called _stontiate_, from the place where it was found in scotland; but they have not as yet been much examined. all stones formed by nature are compounded, and to distinguish them from one another, and ascertain the parts of which they consist, is the subject of _lithology_, a very extensive branch of knowledge. all the simple earths are nearly, if not absolutely, _infusible_; but when they are mixed they may all be fused. lecture xxi. _of ores_. metallizable earths, commonly called _ores_, when united to phlogiston, make the metals, distinguishable for their specific gravity, their opacity, shining appearance, and fusibility. all the proper metals are _malleable_, and those which are not so are called _semi-metals_. the metals again are subdivided into the _perfect_ and _imperfect_. the former, which are _gold_, _silver_, and _platina_, suffer no change by fusion, or the longest continued heat: whereas heat calcines or dissipates the phlogiston of the imperfect metals, which are _mercury_, _lead_, _copper_, _iron_, and _tin_, so that they return to the state of earth; and this earth is always heavier than the metal, though of less specific gravity, having received an addition of weight from water or air: but these earths, or ores, being exposed to heat in contact with substances containing phlogiston, again become metals, and are then said to be _revived_. the semi-metals are _bismuth_, _zinc_, _nickel_, regulus of _arsenic_, of _cobalt_, of _antimony_, of _manganese_, of _wolfram_, and of _molybdena_. all metallic substances are crystallizable, and each in a peculiar form, which is discovered by leaving a hole in the bottom of the crucible in which they are melted, and drawing out the stopper, when the mass is beginning to lose its fluidity. some of the metals will not unite to others when hot, and others of them will; and such as will unite with others are called _solders_. thus tin is a solder for lead, and brass, gold, or silver, for iron. ores are never found in regular strata, like the different kinds of earth; but in places which have formerly been cavities, running in all directions, with respect to the regular strata, and commonly called _veins_. many of the ores in their natural state are said to be _mineralized_ with arsenic or sulphur, those substances being intimately united with the metallic earths. in order to convert the ores into metals, some of them are first reduced to powder, to wash out the earthy or saline particles. they are then kept in a red heat, which the workmen call _roasting_, in order to drive away the arsenic, or sulphur, which are volatile; and in the last place they are fused in contact with charcoal, or other substances containing phlogiston; and to promote the fusion, lime-stone is frequently mixed with them. when the operation is completed, the unmetallic parts are converted into glass, or _scoria_, which lies on the surface, whereas the metal is found at the bottom. to discover the quantity of metal in a small piece of ore is called _assaying_. when metals are fused together, the specific gravity, fusibility, and other properties are changed, and in such a manner as could not be discovered from the properties of the constituent parts. _of gold._ gold is the heaviest of all metallic bodies except platina. it appears yellow or reddish by reflected light, but green or blue by transmitted light, when it is reduced to thin plates. though gold undergoes no change in a common furnace, or burning lens, it may, in part, at least, be calcined by the electric shock. gold has the greatest _ductility_, and in wires of equal diameters, it has the greatest _tenacity_, of all the metals. one grain of it may be made to cover square inches; some gold leaf being less than a , th part of an inch thick; and when it is made to cover a silver wire, the gold upon it may not be more than one twelfth part of the thickness of the gold leaf. this metal is soluble in aqua regia; and being precipitated by a volatile alkali, makes a powder called _aurum fulminans_, which is one fourth heavier than the gold, and explodes with great violence in a heat something greater than that of boiling water. tin precipitates gold in the form of a purple powder, called the _powder of cassius_, from the inventor of it, and is used in enamels, or the glassy coating which is given to metals by heat. gold unites with most of the metals, especially with mercury, and these mixtures are called _amalgams_. in gilding, the amalgam is applied to the surface of the metal to be gilded, and the mercury is driven off by heat, leaving the gold attached to the surface. gold mixed with iron, makes it harder, for the purpose of cutting instruments. to separate gold from the imperfect metals, such as copper, &c. it is mixed with lead, and then exposed to a strong heat, which calcines the lead, and with it the imperfect metals, leaving the gold pure. this process is called _cupellation_, from being performed in a small crucible called a _cupell_. when the gold is mixed with silver, three parts more of silver are put to it, and then the silver is dissolved by nitrous acid, leaving the gold pure. this process is called _quartation_, from the gold being one fourth part of the mass. the fineness of gold is generally estimated by dividing the gold into twenty-four parts, called _carats_. the phrase twenty-three carats fine means that the mass contains twenty-three parts out of twenty-four of pure gold, the remainder being _alloy_, of some baser metal. the fineness of gold may in some measure be discovered by the colour it leaves upon a _touch-stone_, or fine-grained basaltes. gold is generally found nearly pure, but mixed with earth, or diffused in fine grains through stones. lecture xxii. _of silver._ silver is the whitest of all the metals, very ductile, but less so than gold; the thinnest leaves of it being one third thicker than those of gold. it is not calcined in the heat of a common furnace, but partially so by repeated fusion, or a strong burning lens. sulphureous fumes unite with silver, and tinge it black. the nitrous acid dissolves it, and will hold more than half its weight of it in solution. when fully saturated, this solution deposits crystals, which are called _lunar nitre_, or _nitre of silver_. when these crystals are melted, and the water they contain driven off, a black substance, called _lapis infernalis_, or _lunar caustic_, is formed. this is used as a cautery in surgery. a strong heat will decompose this lunar nitre, and recover the silver. though the nitrous acid dissolves silver the most readily, the marine acid will deprive the nitrous of it, and form a substance called _luna cornea_, because, when it is melted and cold, it becomes a transparent mass something resembling _horn_. from this luna cornea the purest silver may be obtained. the vitriolic acid will likewise deprive the nitrous of the silver contained in it, and form a white powder, not easily soluble in water. a fulminating silver may be made by the following process: the silver must first be dissolved in pale nitrous acid, then precipitated by lime-water, dried, and exposed to the air three days. it must then be washed in caustic volatile alkali, after which the fluid must be decanted, and the black powder left to dry in the air. the slightest friction will cause this powder to fulminate. it is said, that even a drop of water falling upon it will produce this effect; so that it ought to be made only in very small quantities, and managed with the greatest caution. most of the metals precipitate silver. that by mercury may be made to assume the form of a tree, called _arbor dianæ_. silver is found native in peru; and the ores frequently contain sulphur, or arsenic, or both. _of platina._ platina is a metal lately discovered in the gold mines of mexico, where it is found in small particles, never exceeding the size of a pea, mixed with ferruginous sand and quartz. the strongest fire will not melt these grains, though it will make them cohere; but they may be melted by a burning lens, or a blow-pipe supplied with dephlogisticated air. pure platina is the heaviest body in nature, its specific gravity exceeding twenty-two. it is very malleable, though considerably harder than gold or silver, and has the property of welding in common with iron. this metal is not affected by exposure to the air, or by any simple acid, though concentrated and hot; but it is dissolved by dephlogisticated marine acid, and by aqua regia, in which a little nitrous air is procured. the solution is brown, and when diluted yellow. this liquor is very corrosive, and tinges animal substances of a blackish brown colour. platina is precipitated from a solution in aqua regia by sal-ammoniac, as gold is by martial vitriol. iron is precipitated from this solution by the prussian alkali. also most of the metals precipitate platina, but not in its metallic state. arsenic facilitates the solution of platina; and by melting it with equal parts of arsenic and vegetable alkali, and then reducing the mass to a powder, it may be made to take any form; and a strong heat will dissipate the arsenic and the alkali, leaving the platina in the shape required, not fusible by any heat in a common furnace. platina does not readily combine with gold or silver, and it resists the action of mercury as much as iron; but it mixes well with lead, making it less ductile, and even brittle, according to the proportion of the platina. with copper it forms a compound which takes a beautiful polish, not liable to tarnish, and is therefore used with advantage for mirrors of reflecting telescopes. it unites easily with tin, and also with bismuth, antimony, and zinc. lecture xxiii. _of mercury._ mercury is the most fusible of all the metals, not becoming solid but in ° below in fahrenheit's thermometer. it is then malleable. it is heavier than any other metal except gold or platina. it is volatile in a temperature much lower than that of boiling water, and in vacuo in the common temperature of the atmosphere; and at six hundred it boils. in a degree of heat in which it would rise easily in vapour, mercury imbibes pure air, and becomes a red calx, called _precipitate per se_. at a greater degree of heat it parts with that air, and is running mercury again. mercury is not perceptibly altered by exposure to the air. mercury is acted upon by the vitriolic acid when hot. in this process vitriolic acid air is procured, and the mercury is converted into a white substance, which being dipped in water becomes yellow, called _turbith mineral_, one third heavier than the mercury from which it was made. by heat this substance parts with its pure air, and becomes running mercury; but if the process be made in a clean earthen vessel, there will remain a portion of _red calx_, which cannot be reduced by any degree of heat, except in contact with some substance containing phlogiston. if this be done with a burning lens, in inflammable air, much of the air will be absorbed. mercury is dissolved most readily in the nitrous acid, when the purest nitrous air is procured; and there remains a substance which is first yellow, and by continuance red, called _red precipitate_. in a greater degree of heat the dephlogisticated air will be recovered, and the mercury be revived; but the substance yields nitrous air after it becomes solid, and till it changes from yellow to red. the precipitates of mercury from acids by means of alkalies possess the property of exploding, when they are exposed to a gradual heat in an iron spoon, after having been triturated with one sixth of their weight of the flowers of sulphur. the residuum consists of a violet-coloured powder, which, by sublimation, is converted into cinnabar. it seems, therefore, as if the sulphur combined suddenly with the mercury, and expelled the dephlogisticated air in an elastic state. the marine acid seizes upon mercury dissolved in nitrous acid, and if the acid be dephlogisticated, the precipitate is _corrosive sublimate_; but with common marine acid, it is called _calomel_, or _mercurius dulcis_. this preparation is generally made in the dry way, by triturating equal parts of mercury, common salt and vitriol, and exposing the whole to a moderate heat; when the corrosive sublimate rises, and adheres to the upper part of the glass vessel in which the process is made. mercury combines readily with sulphur by trituration, and with it forms a black powder called _ethiops mineral_. a more intimate combination of mercury and sulphur is made by means of fire. this is called _cinnabar_, about one third of which is sulphur. vermillion is cinnabar reduced to powder. mercury readily unites with oil, and with it forms a deep black or blue compound, used in medicine. it readily combines with most of the metals, and when it is used in a sufficient quantity to make them soft, the mixture is called an _amalgam_. it combines most readily with gold, silver, lead, tin, bismuth, and zinc. looking-glasses are covered on the back with an amalgam of mercury and tin. when mercury is united with lead or other metals, it is rendered less brilliant and less fluid; but agitation in pure air converts the impure metal into a calx, together with much of the mercury, in the form of a black powder. heat recovers the pure air, and the mercury, leaving the calx of the impure metal. much mercury is found native in a slaty kind of earth, or in masses of clay or stone; but the greatest quantity is found combined with sulphur in _native cinnabar_. lecture xxiv. _of lead._ lead is a metal of a bluish tinge, of no great tenacity, but very considerable specific gravity, being heavier than silver. it melts long before it is red hot, and is then calcined, if it be in contact with respirable air. when boiling it emits fumes, and calcines very rapidly. it may be granulated by being poured into a wooden box, and agitated. during congelation it is brittle, so that the parts will separate by the stroke of a hammer; and by this means the form of its crystals may be discovered. in the progress of calcination it first becomes a dusky grey powder, then yellow, when it is called _massicot_; then, by imbibing pure air, it becomes red, and is called _minium_, or _red lead_. in a greater degree of heat it becomes massicot again, having parted with its pure air. if the heat be too great, and applied rapidly, it becomes a flaky substance, called _litharge_; and with more heat it becomes a _glass_, which readily unites with metallic calces and earths, and is a principal ingredient in the manufacture of _flint glass_, giving it its peculiar density and refractive power. though lead soon tarnishes, the imperfect calx thus made does not separate from the rest of the metal, and therefore protects it from any farther action of the air, by which means it is very useful for the covering of houses, and other similar purposes. all acids act upon lead, and form with it different saline substances. _white-lead_ consists of its union with vinegar and pure air. also dissolved in vinegar, and crystallized, it becomes _sugar of lead_, which, like all the other preparations of this metal, is a deadly poison. oils dissolve the calces of lead, which, by this means, is the basis of paints, plaisters, &c. by means of heat litharge decomposes common salt, the lead uniting with the marine acid, and forming a yellow substance, used in painting, and by this means the fossil alkali is separated. lead unites with most metals, though not with iron. two parts of lead and one of tin make a _solder_, which melts with less heat than either of the metals separately; but a composition of eight parts of bismuth, five of lead, and three of tin, makes a metal which melts in boiling water. this metal will be dissolved by water if it contain any saline matter, and the drinking of it occasions a peculiar kind of cholic. lead is sometimes found native, but generally minerally mineralized with sulphur or arsenic, and often mixed with a small quantity of silver. _of copper._ copper is a metal of a reddish or brownish colour, considerably sonorous, and very malleable. at a heat far below ignition, the surface, of copper becomes covered with a range of prismatic colours, the commencement of its calcination; and with more heat a black scale is formed, which easily separates from the metal, and in a strong heat it melts, and burns with a bluish green flame. copper rusts by exposure to the air; but the partially-calcined surface adheres to the metal, as in the case of lead, and thus preserves it from farther corrosion. copper dissolved in the vitriolic acid forms crystals of a blot colour, called _blue copperas_. from this solution it is precipitated by iron, which by this means becomes coated with copper. the nitrous acid dissolves copper with most rapidity, producing nitrous air. if the solution be distilled, almost all the acid will be retained in the residuum, which is white; but more heat will expel the acid, chiefly in the form of dephlogisticated air, and the remainder will be a black substance, consisting of the pure calx of copper. the vegetable acids dissolve copper as well as the mineral ones, which makes the use of this metal for culinary purposes in some cases dangerous. to prevent this they give it a coat of tin. the solution of copper in the vegetable acid is called _verdigris_. alkalies dissolve copper as well as acids. with the volatile alkali a blue liquor is formed, but in some cases it becomes colourless. all the circumstances of this change of colour have not yet been examined. both oil and sulphur will dissolve copper, and with the latter it forms a blackish grey compound, used by dyers. copper readily unites with melted tin, at a temperature much lower than that which is necessary to melt the copper; by which means copper vessels are easily covered with a coating of tin. a mixture of copper and tin, called _bronze_, the specific gravity of which is greater than that of the medium of the two metals, is used in casting statues, cannon, and bells; and in a certain proportion this mixture is excellent for the purpose of mirrors of reflecting telescopes, receiving a fine polish, and not being apt to tarnish. copper and arsenic make a brittle compound called _tombach_; and with zinc it makes the useful compound commonly called _brass_, in which zinc is about one third of its weight. copper is sometimes found native; but commonly mixed with sulphur, in ores of a red, green, or blue colour. copper being an earlier discovery than that of iron, was formerly used for weapons and the shoeing of horses; and the ancients had a method, with which we are not well acquainted, of giving it a considerable degree of hardness, so that a sword made of it might have a pretty good edge. lecture xxv. _of iron._ iron is a metal of a bluish colour, of the greatest hardness, the most variable in its properties, and the most useful of all the metals; so that without it it is hardly possible for any people to make great advances in arts and civilization. this metal readily parts with its phlogiston, so as to be very subject to calcine, or rust, by exposure to the air. the same is evident by the colours which appear on its surface when exposed to heat, and also when it is struck with flint; the particles that fly from it being iron partially calcined. in consequence of its readily parting with its phlogiston, it is capable of burning, like wood or other fuel, in pure air. iron and platina have the property of _welding_ when very hot, so that two pieces may be joined without any solder. when iron is heated in contact with steam, part of the water takes the place of the phlogiston, while the rest unites with it, and makes inflammable air. by this means the iron acquires one third more weight, and becomes what is called _finery cinder_. this substance, heated in inflammable air, imbibes it, parts with its water, and becomes perfect iron again. if the iron be heated in pure air, it also imbibes the water, of which that air chiefly consists, and also a portion of the peculiar element of the pure air. the solution of iron in spirit of vitriol produces _green copperas_; which being calcined, becomes a red substance, called _colcothar_. the precipitate of iron, by an infusion of galls, is the colouring matter in _ink_, which is kept suspended by means of gum. the precipitate from the same solution by phlogisticated alkali, is _prussian blue_. water saturated with fixed air dissolves iron, and makes a pleasant chalybeat. the calx of iron gives a green colour to glass. iron readily combines with sulphur. when they are found combined by nature, the substance is called _pyrites_. the union of phosphoric acid with iron makes it brittle when cold, commonly called _cold short_; and the union of arsenic makes it brittle when hot, thence called _red short_. iron unites with gold, silver, and platina, and plunged in a white heat into mercury, it becomes coated with it; and if the process be frequently repeated, it will become brittle, which shews that there is some mutual action between them. iron readily unites with tin; and by dipping thin plates of iron into melted tin, they get a complete coating of it, and make the _tinned plates_ in common use. when crude iron comes from the smelting furnace it is brittle; and when it is white within, it is extremely hard; but when it has a black grain, owing to its having more phlogiston, it is softer, and may be filed and bored. cast iron becomes _malleable_ by being exposed to a blast of air when nearly melting; the consequence of which is a discharge of inflammable air, and the separation of a liquid substance, which, when concreted, is called _finery cinder_. the iron generally loses one fourth of its weight in the process. crude iron contains much _plumbago_, and the access of pure air probably assists in discharging it, by converting it into air, chiefly inflammable. malleable iron, exposed to a red heat in contact with charcoal, called _cementation_, converts it into _steel_, which has the properties of becoming much harder than iron, and very elastic, by being first made very hot, and then suddenly cooled, by plunging it in cold water. by first making it very hard, and then giving different degrees of heat, and cooling it in those different degrees, it is capable of a great variety of _tempers_, proper for different uses. of the degrees of heat workmen judge by the change of colour on its surface. steel, like crude iron, is capable of being melted without losing its properties. it is then called _cast steel_, and is of a more uniform texture. iron acquires some little weight by being converted into steel; and when dissolved in acid, it yields more plumbago. steel has something less specific gravity than iron. if the cementation be continued too long, the steel acquires a darkish fracture, it is more fusible, and incapable of welding. steel heated in contact with earthy matters, is reduced to iron. iron is the only substance capable of _magnetism_; and hardened steel alone is capable of retaining magnetism. the loadstone is an ore of iron. lecture xxvi. _of tin._ tin is a metal of a slightly yellowish cast, though harder than lead, very malleable, but of no great tenacity; so that wires cannot be made of it. it easily extends under the hammer, and plates of it, called _tinfoil_, are made only one thousandth part of an inch thick, and might be made as thin again. tin has less specific gravity than any other metal. it melts long before ignition, at of fahrenheit, and by the continuance of heat is slowly converted into a white powder, which is the chief ingredient in _putty_, used in polishing, &c. like lead, it is brittle when heated little short of fusion, and may be reduced into grains by agitation as it passes from a fluid to a solid state. the calx of tin resists fusion more than that of any other metal, which makes it useful in making an opaque white enamel. tin loses its bright surface when exposed to the air, but is not properly subject to rust; so that it is useful in protecting iron and other metals from the effects of the atmosphere. concentrated vitriolic acid, assisted by heat, dissolves half its weight of tin, and yields vitriolic acid air. with more water it yields inflammable air. during the solution the phlogiston of the tin uniting with the acid, forms sulphur, which makes it turbid. by long standing, or the addition of water, the calx of tin is precipitated from the solution. the nitrous acid dissolves tin very rapidly without heat, and yields but little nitrous air. with marine acid this metal yields inflammable air. with aqua regia it assumes the form of a gelatinous substance used by dyers to heighten the colour of some red tinctures, so as to produce a bright scarlet in dying wool. a transparent liquor, which emits very copious fumes, called, from the inventor, _the smoking liquor of libavius_, is made by distilling equal parts of amalgam of tin and mercury with corrosive sublimate, triturated together. a colourless liquor comes over first, and then a thick white fume, which condenses into the transparent liquor above mentioned. mr. adet has shewn, that this liquor bears the same relation to the common solution of tin, that corrosive sublimate does to calomel, and has given an ingenious solution of many of its properties. tin detonates with nitre; and if the crystals made by the solution of copper in the nitrous acid be inclosed in tinfoil, nitrous fumes will be emitted, and the whole will become red hot. also if five times its weight of sulphur be added to melted tin, a black brittle compound, which readily takes fire, will be formed. another combination of tin, sulphur, and mercury, makes a light yellow substance called _aurum musivum_ used in painting. tin is the principal ingredient in the composition of _pewter_, the other ingredients being lead, zinc, bismuth, and copper; each pewterer having his peculiar receipt. it is also used in coating copper and iron plates, and in silvering looking-glasses, besides being cast into a variety of forms, when it is called _block tin_. tin is sometimes found native, but is generally mineralized with sulphur and arsenic. the latter is thought to be always contained in tin, and to be the cause of the crackling noise made by bending plates of it. _of the semi-metals._ bismuth is a semi-metal of a yellowish or reddish cast, but little subject to change in the air; harder than lead, but easily broken, and reducible to powder. when broken it exhibits large shining facets, in a variety of positions. thin pieces of it are considerably sonorous. bismuth melts at about ° of fahrenheit. with more heat it ignites, and burns with a slight blue flame, while a yellowish calx, called _flowers of bismuth_, is produced. with more heat it becomes a greenish glass. in a strong heat, and in close vessels, this metal sublimes. vitriolic acid, even concentrated and boiling, has but little effect upon bismuth; but the nitrous acid acts upon it with the greatest rapidity and violence, producing much nitrous air, mixed with phlogisticated nitrous vapour. from the solution of bismuth in this acid, a white substance, called _magistery of bismuth_, is precipitated by the affusion of water. this has been used as a paint for the skin but has been thought to injure it. the marine acid does not readily act upon bismuth; but when concentrated, it forms with it a saline combination, which does not easily crystallize, but may be sublimed in the form of a soft fusible salt, called _butter of bismuth_. bismuth unites with most metallic substances, and in general renders them more fusible. when calcined with the imperfect metals, it unites with them, and has the same effect as lead in cupellation. bismuth is used in the composition of pewter, in printers' types, and other metallic mixtures. this metal is sometimes found native, but more commonly mineralized with sulphur. lecture xxvii. _of nickel._ nickel is a semi-metal of a reddish cast, of great hardness, and always magnetical; on which account it is supposed to contain iron, though chemists have not yet been able to separate them. the purest nickel was so infusible as not to run into a mass in the strongest heat of a smith's forge; but then it was in some degree malleable. concentrated acid of vitriol only corrodes nickel. alkalies precipitate it from its solution in the nitrous acid, and dissolve the precipitate. it readily unites with sulphur. nickel is found either native or mineralized with several other metals, especially with copper, when it is called _kupfer nickel_, or _false copper_, being of a reddish or copper colour. this semi-metal has not yet been applied to any use. _of arsenic._ what is commonly called _arsenic_ is the calx of a semi-metal called the _regulus of arsenic_. it is a white and brittle substance, expelled from the ores of several metals by heat. it is then refined by a second sublimation, and melted into the masses in which it is commonly sold. this calx is soluble in about eighty times its weight of cold water, or in fifteen times its weight of boiling water. it acts in many respects like an acid, as it decomposes nitre by distillation, when the nitrous acid flies off, and the _arsenical salt of macquer_ remains behind. when the calx of arsenic is distilled with sulphur, the vitriolic acid flies off, and a substance of a yellow colour, called _orpiment_, is produced. this appears to consist of sulphur and the regulus of arsenic; part of the sulphur receiving pure air from the calx, to which it communicates phlogiston; and thus the sulphur becomes converted into vitriolic acid, while the arsenical calx is reduced, and combines with the rest of the sulphur. the combination of sulphur and arsenic, by melting them together, is of a red colour, known by the name of _realgal_, or _realgar_. it is less volatile than orpiment. the solution of fixed alkali dissolves the calx of arsenic, and by means of heat a brown tenacious mass is produced, and having also a disagreeable smell, it is called _liver of arsenic_. the regulus of arsenic is of a yellow colour, subject to tarnish or grow black, by exposure to the air, very brittle, and of a laminated texture. in close vessels it wholly sublimes, but burns with a small flame in pure air. vitriolic acid has little action upon this semi-metal, except when hot; but the nitrous acid acts readily upon it, and likewise dissolves the calx, as does boiling marine acid, though it affects it very little when cold. most of the metals unite with the regulus of arsenic. dephlogisticated marine acid converts the calx of arsenic into _arsenical acid_ by giving it pure air. the acid of arsenic acts more or less upon all metals, but the phenomena do not appear to be of much importance. the calx of acid is used in a variety of the arts, especially in the manufactory of glass. orpiment and realgar are used as pigments. some attempts have been made to introduce it into medicine, but being dangerous, the experiments should be made with caution. _of cobalt._ cobalt is a semi-metal of a grey or steel colour, of a close-grained fracture, more difficult of fusion than copper, not easily calcined. it soon tarnishes in the air, but water has no effect upon it. cobalt, dissolved in _aqua regia_, makes an excellent sympathetic ink, appearing green when held to the fire, and disappearing when cold, unless it has been heated too much, when it burns the paper. the calx of cobalt is of a deep blue colour, which, when fused, makes the blue glass called _smalt_. the ore of cobalt, called _zaffre_, is found in several parts of europe, but chiefly in saxony. as it is commonly sold, it contains twice or thrice its weight of powder of flints. the smalt is usually composed of one part of calcined cobalt, fused with two parts of powder of flint and one of pot-ash. the chief use of cobalt is for making smalt; but the powder and the blue-stone used by laundresses is a preparation made by the dutch of a coarse kind of smalt. _of zinc._ zinc is a semi-metal of a bluish cast, brighter than lead, and so far malleable as not to be broken by a hammer, though it cannot be much extended. when broken by bending, it appears to consist of cubical grains. if it be heated nearly to melting, it will be sufficiently brittle to be pulverized. it melts long before ignition, and when it is red hot, it burns with a dazzling white flame, and is calcined with such rapidity, that its calx flies up in the form of white flowers, called _flowers of zinc_, or _philosophical wool_. in a stronger heat they become a clear yellow glass. heated in close vessels, this metal rises without decomposition, being the most volatile of all the metals except the regulus of _arsenic_. zinc dissolved in diluted vitriolic acid, yields much inflammable air, and has a residuum, which appears to be plumbago, and the liquor forms crystals, called _white copperas_. this metals also yields inflammable air when dissolved in the marine acid. dissolved in the nitrous acid, it yields dephlogisticated nitrous air, with very little proper nitrous air. the ore of zinc, called _calamine_, is generally of a white colour; and the chief use of it is to unite it with copper, with which it makes brass and other gold-coloured mixtures of metals. the calx and the salts of this metal are occasionally used in medicine. lecture xxviii. _of antimony._ the regulus of antimony is of a silvery white colour, of a scaly texture, very brittle, and melts soon after ignition. by continuance of heat it calcines in white fumes, called _argentine flowers of antimony_, which melt into a hyacinthine glass. in close vessels it rises without decomposition. its calx is soluble in water, like that of arsenic. this metal tarnishes, but does not properly rust, by exposure to the air. this metal is soluble in aqua regia. it detonates with nitre, and what remains of equal parts of nitre and regulus of antimony after detonation, in a hot crucible, is called _diaphoretic antimony_. the water used in this preparation contains a portion of the calx suspended by the alkali, and being precipitated by an acid, is called _ceruse of antimony_. when regulus of antimony is pulverized and mixed with twice its weight of corrosive sublimate (which is attended with heat) and then distilled with a gentle fire, a thick fluid comes over, which is congealed in the receiver, or in the neck of the retort, and is called _butter of antimony_. the residuum consists of revived mercury, with some regulus and calx of antimony. when this butter of antimony is thrown into pure water, there is a white precipitate, called _powder of algaroth_, a violent emetic. nitrous acid dissolves the butter of antimony; and when an equal weight of nitrous acid has been three times distilled to dryness from butter of antimony, the residuum, after ignition, is called _bezoar mineral_, and seems to be little more than a calx of the metal. crude antimony, which has been much used in the experiments of alchemists, is a combination of sulphur and regulus of antimony. heat melts it, and finally converts it into glass, of a dark red colour, called _liver of antimony_. if antimony be melted or boiled with a fixed alkali, a precipitate is made by cooling, called _kermes mineral_, formerly used in medicine. the antimonial preparations that are now most in use are _antimonial wine_ and _tartar emetic_. the wine is made by infusing pulverized glass of antimony in spanish wine some days, and filtering the clear fluid through paper. the emetic tartar, or antimonial tartar, is a saline substance, composed of acid of tartar, vegetable alkali, and antimony partially calcined. the preparation may be seen in the dispensaries. the regulus of antimony is used in the form of pills, which purge more or less in proportion to the acid they meet with; and as they undergo little or no change in passing through the body, they are called _perpetual pills_. _of manganese._ manganese is a hard, black mineral, very ponderous, and the regulus of it is a semi-metal of a dull white colour when broken, but soon grows dark by exposure to the air. it is hard and brittle, though not pulverizable, rough in its fracture, and of very difficult fusion. its calces are white when imperfect, but black, or dark green, when perfect. the white calx is soluble in acids. when broken in pieces, it falls into powder by a spontaneous calcination, and this powder is magnetical, though the mass was not possessed of that property. the black calx of manganese is altogether insoluble in acids. it contains much dephlogisticated air. the calx of manganese is used in making glass; the glass destroying the colour of that of the other materials, and thereby making the whole mass transparent. this semi-metal mixes with most of the metals in fusion, but not with mercury. there is another ore of manganese, called _black woad_, which inflames spontaneously when mixed with oil. _of wolfram._ wolfram is a mineral of a brownish or black colour, found in the tin mines of cornwall, of a radiated or foliated texture, shining almost like a metal. it contains much of the calx of manganese, and iron; but when the substance is pulverized, these are easily dissolved, and the calx of wolfram is found to be yellow. this calx turns blue by exposure to light; and an hundred grains of it heated with charcoal will yield sixty grains of a peculiar metal, in small particles, which, when broken, look like steel. it is soluble in the vitriolic or marine acids, and reduced to a yellow calx by nitrous acid or aqua regia. _of molybdena._ molybdena is a substance which much resembles plumbago; but its texture is scaly, and not easily pulverized, on account of a degree of flexibility which its laminæ possess. with extreme heat, and mixed with charcoal, it yields small particles of a metal that is grey, brittle, and extremely infusible; and uniting with several of the metals, it forms with them brittle or friable compounds. by heat it is converted into a white calx. _of solid combustible substances._ there yet remains a class of solid substances, of the _combustible_ kind, but most of them have been already considered under the form of the fluids, from which they are originally formed, as _bitumen_, _pit-coal_, and _amber_; or under the principal ingredients of which they are composed, as _sulphur_ and _plumbago_. there only remains to be mentioned the _diamond_, which is of a nature quite different from that of the other precious stones, the principal ingredient in which is siliceous earth, which renders them not liable to be much affected by heat. on the contrary, the diamond is a combustible substance; for in a degree of heat somewhat greater than that which will melt silver, it burns with a slight flame, diminishes common air, and leaves a soot behind. also, if diamond powder be triturated with vitriolic acid, it turns it black, which is another proof of its containing phlogiston. the diamond is valued on account of its extreme hardness, the exquisite polish it is capable of, and its extraordinary refractive power; for light falling on its interior surface with an angle of incidence greater than ½ will be wholly reflected, whereas in glass it requires an angle of degrees. lecture xxix. _of the doctrine of phlogiston and the composition of water._ it was supposed to be a great discovery of mr. stahl, that all inflammable substances, as well as metals, contain a principle, or substance, to which he gave the name of phlogiston, and that the addition or deprivation of this substance makes some of the most remarkable changes in bodies, especially that the union of a metallic calx and this substance makes a metal; and that combustion consists in the separation of phlogiston from the substances that contain it. that it is the same principle, or substance, that enters into all inflammable substances, and metals, is evident, from its being disengaged from any of them, and entering into the composition of any of the others. thus the phlogiston of charcoal or inflammable air becomes the phlogiston of any of the metals, when the calx is heated in contact with either of them. on the contrary, mr. lavoisier and most of the french chemists, are of opinion, that there is no such principle, or substance, as phlogiston; that metals and other inflammable bodies are simple substances, which have an affinity to pure air; and that combustion consists not in the separation of any thing from the inflammable substance, but in the union of pure air with it. they moreover say, that water is not, as has been commonly supposed, a simple substance, but that it consists of two elements, viz. pure air, or _oxygene_, and another, to which they give the name of _hydrogene_, which, with the principle of _heat_, called by them _calorique_, is inflammable air. the principal fact adduced by them to prove that metals do not lose any thing when they become calces, but only gain something, is, that mercury becomes a calx, called _precipitate per se_, by imbibing pure air, and that it becomes running mercury again by parting with it. this is acknowledged: but it is almost the only case of any calx being revived without the help of some known phlogistic substance; and in this particular case it is not absurd to suppose, that the mercury, in becoming precipitate per se, may retain all its phlogiston, as well as imbibe pure air, and therefore be revived by simply parting with that air. in many other cases the same metal, in different states, contains more or less phlogiston, as cast iron, malleable iron, and steel. also there is a calx of mercury made by the acid of vitriol, which cannot be revived without the help of inflammable air, or some other substance supposed to contain phlogiston: and that the inflammable air is really imbibed in these processes, is evident, from its wholly disappearing, and nothing being left in the vessel in which the process is made beside the metal that is revived by it. if precipitate per se be revived in inflammable air, the air will be imbibed, so that running mercury may contain more or less phlogiston. the antiphlogistians also say, that the diminution of atmospherical air by the burning of phosphorus is a proof of their theory; the pure air being imbibed by that substance, and nothing emitted from it. but there is the same proof of phosphorus containing phlogiston, that there is of dry flesh containing it; since the produce of the solution of it in nitrous acid, and its effect upon the acid, are the same, viz. the production of phlogisticated air, and the phlogistication of the acid. their proof that water is decomposed, is, that in sending steam over hot iron, inflammable air (which they suppose to be one constituent part of it) is procured; while the other part, viz. the oxygene, unites with the iron, and adds to its weight. but it is replied, that the inflammable air may be well supposed to be the phlogiston of the iron, united to part of the water, as its base, while the remainder of the water is imbibed by the calx; and that it is mere water, and not pure air, or oxygene, that is retained in the iron, is evident, from nothing but pure water being recovered when this calx of iron is revived in inflammable air, in which case the inflammable air wholly disappears, taking the place of the water, by which it had been expelled. in answer to this it is said, that the pure air expelled from the calx uniting with the inflammable air in the vessel, recomposes the water found after this process. but in every other case in which any substance containing pure air is heated in inflammable air, though the inflammable air be in part imbibed, some _fixed air_ is produced, and this fixed air is composed of the pure air in the substance and part of the inflammable air in the vessel. thus, if _minium_, which contains pure air, and _massicot_, which contains none, be heated in inflammable air, in both the cases lead will be revived by the absorption of inflammable air; but in the former case only, and not in the latter, will fixed air be produced. the calx of iron, therefore, having the same effect with massicot, when treated in the same manner, appears to contain no more pure air than massicot does. besides this explanation of the facts on which the new theory is founded, which shews it to be unnecessary, the old hypothesis being sufficient for the purpose, some facts are alledged, as inconsistent with the new doctrine. if the calx of iron made by water, and charcoal made by the greatest degree of heat, be mixed together, a great quantity of inflammable air will be produced; though, according to the new theory, neither of these substances contained any water, which they maintain to be the only origin of it. but this fact is easily explained upon the doctrine of phlogiston; the water in this calx uniting with the phlogiston of the charcoal, and then forming inflammable air; and it is the same kind of inflammable air that is made from charcoal and water. also the union of inflammable and pure air, when they are fired together by means of the electric spark, produces not pure water, as, according to the new theory, it ought to do, but _nitrous acid_. to this it has been objected, that the acid thus produced came from the decomposition of phlogisticated air, a small portion of which was at first contained in the mixture of the two kinds of air. but when every particle of phlogisticated air is excluded, the strongest acid is procured. they find, indeed, that by the slow burning of inflammable air in pure air, they get pure water. but then it appears, that whenever this is the case, there is a production of phlogisticated air, which contains the necessary element of nitrous acid; and this is always the case when there is a little surplus of the inflammable air that is fired along with the pure air, as the acid is always procured when there is a redundancy of pure air. that much water should be procured by the decomposition of these kinds of air, is easily accounted for, by supposing that water, or steam, is the basis of these, as well as of all other kinds of air. since air something better than that of the atmosphere is constantly produced from water by converting it into vapour, and also by removing the pressure of the atmosphere, and these processes do not appear to have any limits; it seems probable, that _water_ united to the principle of _heat_; constitutes atmospherical air; and if so, it must consist of the elements of both dephlogisticated and phlogisticated air; which is a supposition very different from that of the french chemists. lecture xxx. _of heat._ heat is an affection of bodies well known by the sensation that it excites. it is produced by friction or compression, as by the striking of flint against steel, and the hammering of iron, by the reflection or refraction of light, and by the combustion of inflammable substances. it has been long disputed, whether the cause of heat be properly a _substance_, or some particular affection of the particles that compose the substance that is heated. but be it a substance, or a principle of any other kind, it is capable of being transferred from one body to another, and the communication of it is attended with the following circumstances. all substances are expanded by heat, but some in a greater degree than others; as metals more than earthy substances, and charcoal more than wood. also some receive and transmit heat through their substance more readily than others; metals more so than earths, and of the metals, copper more readily than iron. instruments contrived to ascertain the expansion of substances by heat, are called _pyrometers_, and are of various constructions. as a standard to measure the degrees of heat, mercury is in general preferable to any other substance, on account of its readily receiving, and communicating, heat through its whole mass. _thermometers_, therefore, or instruments to measure the degrees of heat, are generally constructed of it, though, as it is subject to become solid in a great degree of cold, ardent spirit, which will not freeze at all, is more proper in that particular case. the graduation of thermometers is arbitrary. in that of fahrenheit, which is chiefly used in england, the freezing point of water is °, and the boiling point °. in that of reaumur, which is chiefly used abroad, the freezing point of water is , and the boiling point . to measure the degrees of heat above ignition, mr. wedgwood has happily contrived to use pieces of clay, which contract in the fire; and he has also been able to find the coincidence of the degrees in mercurial thermometers with those of his own. to measure the degrees of heat and cold during a person's absence, lord george cavendish contrived an instrument, in which a small bason received the mercury, that was raised higher than the place for which it was regulated by heat or cold, without a power of returning. but mr. six has lately hit upon a better method, viz. introducing into the tube of his thermometer a small piece of iron, which is raised by the ascent of the mercury, and prevented from descending by a small spring; but which may be brought back to its former place by a magnet acting through the glass. heat, like light, is propagated in right lines; and what is more remarkable, cold observes the same laws. for if the substance emitting heat without light, as iron below ignition, be placed in the focus of a burning mirror, a thermometer in the focus of a similar mirror, placed parallel to it, though at a considerable distance, will be heated by it, and if a piece of ice be placed there, the mercury will fall. heat assists the solvent power of almost all menstrua; so that many substances will unite in a certain degree of heat, which will form no union at all without it, as dephlogisticated and inflammable air. if substances be of the same kind, they will receive heat from one another, in proportion to their masses. thus, if a quantity of water heated to ° be mixed with another equal quantity of water heated to °, the whole mass will be heated to °. but if the substances be of different kinds, they will receive heat from each other in different proportions, according to their _capacity_ (as it is called) of receiving heat. thus, if a pint of mercury of the temperature of be mixed with a pint of water of the temperature of , the temperature of the two after mixture will not be a medium between those two numbers, viz. , but ; consequently the mercury was cooled °, while the water was heated only ; so that degrees of heat in water correspond to in mercury. but mercury is about times specifically heavier than water, so that an equal weight of mercury would contain only one thirtieth part of this heat; and dividing by , the quotient is . if _weight_, therefore, be considered, the heat discovered by water should be reckoned as instead of ; and consequently when water receives degrees of heat, an equal weight of mercury will receive °; and dividing both the numbers by , if the heat of water be , that of the mercury will be . or since they receive equal degrees of heat, whether they discover it or not (and the less they discover, the more they retain in a latent state) a pound of mercury contains no more than one thirtieth part of the heat actually existing in a pound of water of the same temperature. water, therefore, is said to have a greater capacity for receiving and retaining heat, without discovering it, than mercury, in the proportion of to , if weight be considered, or of to , that is of to ; if _bulk_ be the standard, though, according to some, it is as to . the capacity of receiving heat in the substance is greatest in a state of vapour, and least in that of a solid; so that when ice is converted into water, heat is absorbed, and more still when it is converted into vapour; and on the contrary, when vapour is converted into water, it gives out the heat which it had imbibed, and when it becomes ice it gives out still more. if equal quantities of ice and water be exposed to heat at the temperature of °, the ice will only become water, without receiving any additional sensible heat; but an equal quantity of water in the same situation would be raised to °, so that degrees of heat will be imbibed, and remain in latent in the water, in consequence of its passing from a state of ice: and heat communicated by a given weight of vapour will raise an equal weight of a nonevaporable substance, of the same capacity with water, degrees; so that much more heat is latent in steam, than in the water from which it was formed. this doctrine of latent heat explains a great variety of phænomena in nature; as that of cooling bodies by evaporation, the vapour of water, or any other fluid substance, absorbing and carrying off the heat they had before. water, perfectly at rest, will fall considerably below the freezing point, and yet continue fluid: but on the slightest agitation, the congelation of the whole, or part of it, takes place instantly, and if the whole be not solid, it will instantly rise to °, the freezing point. from whatever cause, some motion seems necessary to the commencement of congelation, at least in a moderate temperature; but whenever any part of the water becomes solid, it gives out some of the heat it had before, and that heat which was before latent becoming sensible, and being diffused through the whole mass, raises its temperature. on the same principle, when water heated higher than the boiling point in a digester is suddenly permitted to escape in the form of steam, the remainder is instantly reduced to the common boiling point, the heat above that point being carried off in a latent state by the steam. had it not been for this wise provision in nature, the whole of any quantity of water would, in all cases of freezing, have become solid at once; and also the whole of any quantity that was heated to the point of boiling, would have been converted into steam at once; circumstances which would have been extremely inconvenient, and often fatal. this doctrine also explains the effect of freezing mixtures, as that of salt and snow. these solid substances, on being mixed, become fluid, and that fluid absorbing much heat, deprives all the neighbouring bodies of part of what they had. but if the temperature at which the mixture is made be as low as that to which this mixture would have brought it, it has no effect, and in a lower temperature this new fluid would become solid; for that mixture has only a certain determinate capacity for heat, and if the neighbouring bodies have less heat, they will take from it. it has been observed, that the comparative heat of bodies containing phlogiston is increased by calcination or combustion; so that the calx of iron has a greater capacity for heat, and therefore contains more latent heat, than the metal. in general it is not found, that the same substances have their capacity for receiving heat increased by an increase of temperature; but this is said to be the case with a mixture of ardent spirit and water, and also that of spirit of vitriol and water. since all substances contain a greater or less quantity of heat, and in consequence of being deprived of it become colder and colder, it is a question of some curiosity to determine the extent to which this can go, or at what degree in the scale of a thermometer any substance would be absolutely cold, or deprived of all heat; and an attempt has been made to solve this problem in the following manner. comparing the capacity of water with that of ice, by means of a third substance, viz. mercury, it has been found, that if that of ice be °, that of water is °; so that water in becoming ice gives out one tenth part of its whole quantity of heat. but it has been shown, that ice in becoming water absorbs degrees of heat. this, therefore, being one tenth part of the whole heat of water, it must have contained degrees; so that taking degrees, which is the freezing point, from that number, the point of absolute cold will be below of fahrenheit's scale. by a computation, made by means of the heat of inflammable and dephlogisticated air, at the temperature of , dr. crawford finds, that it contains nearly degrees of heat; so that the point of absolute cold will be below . but more experiments are wanted to solve this curious problem to entire satisfaction. lecture xxxi. _of animal heat._ since all animals, and especially those that have red blood, are much hotter than the medium in which they live, the source of this heat has become the subject of much investigation; and as the most probable theory is that of dr. crawford, i shall give a short detail of the reasons on which it is founded. having, with the most scrupulous attention, ascertained the _latent_, or, as he calls it, the _absolute_ heat of blood, and also that of the aliments of which it is composed, he finds that it contains more than could have been derived from _them_. also finding that the absolute heat of arterial blood exceeds that of venous blood, in the proportion of ½ to , he concludes that it derives its heat from the air respired in the lungs, and that it parts with this _latent_ heat, so that it becomes sensible, in the course of its circulation, in which it becomes loaded with phlogiston, which it communicates to the air in the lungs. that this heat is furnished by the _air_, he proves, by finding, that that which we inspire contains more heat than that which we expire, or than the aqueous humor which we expire along with it, in a very considerable proportion; so that if the heat contained in the pure air did not become latent in the blood, it would raise its temperature higher than that of red-hot iron. and again, if the venous blood, in being converted into arterial blood, did not receive a supply of latent heat from the air, its temperature would fall from to below in fahrenheit's thermometer. that the heat procured by combustion has the same source, viz. the dephlogisticated air that is decomposed in the process, is generally allowed; and dr. crawford finds, that when equal portions of air are altered by the respiration of a guinea pig, or by the burning of charcoal, the quantity of heat communicated by the two processes is nearly equal. the following facts are also alleged in favour of his theory. whereas animals which have much red blood, and respire much, have the power of keeping themselves in a temperature considerably higher than that of the surrounding atmosphere, other animals, as _frogs_ and _serpents_, are nearly of the same temperature with it; and those animals which have the largest respiratory organs, as birds, are the warmest; also the degree of heat is in some measure proportionable to the quantity of air that is respired in a given time, as in violent exercise. it has been observed, that animals in a medium hotter than the blood have a power of preserving themselves in the same temperature. in this case the heat is probably carried off by perspiration, while the blood ceases to receive, or give out, any heat; and dr. crawford finds, that when an animal is placed in a warm medium the colour of the venous blood approaches nearer to that of the arterial than when it is placed in a colder medium; and also, that it phlogisticates the air less than in the former case; so that in these circumstances respiration has not the same effect that it has in a colder temperature, in giving the body an additional quantity of heat; which is an excellent provision in nature, as the heat is not wanted, but, on the contrary, would prove inconvenient. lecture xxxii. _of light._ another most important agent in nature, and one that has a near connexion with heat, is _light_, being emitted by all bodies in a state of ignition, and especially by the sun, the great source of light and of heat to this habitable world. whether light consists of particles of matter (which is most probable) or be the undulation of a peculiar fluid, filling all space, it is emitted from all luminous bodies in right lines. falling upon other bodies, part of the light is _reflected_ at an angle equal to that of its incidence, though not by impinging on the reflecting surface, but by a power acting at a small distance from it. but another part of the light enters the body, and is _refracted_ or bent _towards_, or _from_, the perpendicular to the surface of the new medium, if the incidence be oblique to it. in general, rays of light falling obliquely on any medium are bent as if they were attracted by it, when it has a greater density, or contains more of the inflammable principle, than the medium through which it was transmitted to it. more of the rays are reflected when they fall upon a body with a small degree of obliquity to its surface, and more of them are transmitted, or enter the body, when their incidence is nearer to a perpendicular. the velocity with which light is emitted or reflected is the same, and so great that it passes from the sun to the earth in about eight minutes and twelve seconds. rays of light emitted or reflected from a body entering the pupil of the eye, are so refracted by the humours of it, as to be united at the surface of the retina, and so make images of the objects, by means of which they are visible to us; and the magnifying power of telescopes or microscopes depends upon contriving, by means of reflections or refractions, that pencils of rays issuing from every point of any object shall first diverge, and then converge, as they would have done from a much larger object, or from one placed much nearer to the eye. when a beam of light is bent out of its course by refraction, all the rays of which it consists are not equally refracted, but some of them more and others less; and the colour which they are disposed to exhibit is connected invariably with the degree of their refrangibility; the red-coloured rays being the least, and the violet the most refrangible, and the rest being more or less so in proportion to their nearness to these, which are the extremes, in the following order, violet, indigo, blue, green, yellow, orange, red. these colours, when separated as much possible, are still contiguous; and all the shades of each colour have likewise their separate and invariable degrees of refrangibility. when separated as distinctly as possible, they divide the whole space between them exactly as a musical chord is divided in order to found the several notes and half notes of an octave. these differently-coloured rays of light are also separated in passing through the transparent medium of air and water, in consequence of which the sky appears blue and the sea green, these rays being returned, while the red ones proceed to a greater distance. by this means also objects at the bottom of the sea appear to divers red, and so do all objects enlightened by an evening sun. the mixture of all the differently-coloured rays, in the proportions in which they cover the coloured image above mentioned, makes a _white_, and the absence of all light is _blackness_. by means of the different refrangibility of light, the colours of the rainbow may be explained. the distance to which the differently-coloured rays are separated from each other is not in proportion to the mean refractive power of the medium, but depends upon the peculiar constitution of the substance by which they are refracted. the _dispersing power_ of glass, into the composition of which _lead_ enters, is great in proportion to the mean refraction; and it is proportionally little in that glass in which there is much alkaline salt. the construction of _achromatic telescopes_ depends upon this principle. not only have different rays of light these different properties with respect to bodies, so as to be more or less refracted, or dispersed, by them, but different sides of the same rays seem to have different properties, for they are differently affected on entering a piece of _island crystal_. with the same degree of incidence; part of the pencil of rays, consisting of all the colours, proceeds in one direction, and the rest in a different one; so that objects seen through a piece of this substance appear double. at the surface of all bodies rays of light are promiscuously reflected, or transmitted. but if the next surface be very near to it, the rays of one colour chiefly are reflected, and the rest transmitted, and these places occur alternately for rays of each of the colours in passing from the thinnest to the thickest parts of the medium; so that several series, or orders, of colours will be visible on the surface of the same thin transparent body. on this principle coloured rings appear between a plane and a convex lens, in a little oil on the surface of water, and in bubbles made with soap and water. when rays of light pass near to any body, so as to come within the sphere of its attraction and repulsion, an _inflection_ takes place; all the kinds of rays being bent _towards_, or _from_, the body, and these powers affecting some rays more than others, they are by this means also separated from each other, so that coloured streaks appear both within the shadow, and the outside of it, the red rays being inflected at the greatest distance from the body. part of the light which enters bodies is retained within them, and proceeds no farther; but so loosely in some kinds of bodies, that a small degree of heat is sufficient to expel it again, so as to make the body visible in the dark: but the more heat is applied, the sooner is all the light expelled. this is a strong argument for the materiality of light. _bolognian phosphorus_ is a substance which has this property; but a composition made by mr. canton, of calcined oyster-shells and sulphur, in a much greater degree. however, white paper, and most substances, except the metals, are possessed of this property in a small degree. some bodies, especially phosphorus, and animal substances tending to putrefaction, emit light without being sensibly hot. the _colours_ of vegetables, and likewise their _taste_ and _smell_, depend upon light. it is also by means of light falling on the leaves and other green parts of plants, that they emit dephlogisticated air, which preserves the atmosphere fit for respiration. it is light that imparts colour to the skins of men, by means of the fluid immediately under them. this is the cause of _tanning_, of the _copper colour_ of the north americans, and the _black_ of the negroes. light also gives colour to several other substances, especially the solutions of mercury in acids. lecture xxxiii. _of magnetism._ magnetism is a property peculiar to iron, or some ores of it. the earth itself, owing probably to the iron ores contained in it, has the same property. but though all iron is acted upon by magnetism, _steel_ only is capable of having the power communicated to it. every magnet has two poles, denominated _north_ and _south_, each of which attracts the other, and repels that of the same kind with itself. if a magnet be cut into two parts, between the two poles, it will make two magnets, the parts that were contiguous becoming opposite poles. though the poles of a magnet are denominated _north_ and _south_, they do not constantly, and in all parts of the earth, point due north or south, but in most places to the east or west of them, and with a considerable variation in a course of time. also a magnet exactly balanced at its center will have a declination from an horizontal position of about degrees. the former is called the _variation_, and the latter the _dipping_ of the magnetic needle. a straight bar of iron which has been long fixed in a vertical position, will become a magnet, the lower end becoming a north pole, and the upper end a south one; for if it be suspended horizontally, the lower end will point towards the north, and the upper end towards the south. also any bar of iron, not magnetical, held in a vertical position, will become a temporary magnet, the lower end becoming a north pole, and the upper end a south one; and a few strokes of a hammer will fix the poles for a short time, though the position of the ends be changed. magnetism may likewise be given to a bar of iron by placing it firmly in the position of the dipping-needle, and rubbing it hard one way with a polished steel instrument. iron will also become magnetical by ignition and quenching it in water in the position of the dipping-needle. magnetism acts, without any diminution of its force, through any medium; and iron not magnetical will have that power while it is in connexion with a magnet, or rather the power of the magnet is extended through the iron. steel filings gently thrown upon a magnet, adhere to it in a curious manner; and the filings, acquiring magnetism by the contact, adhere together, and form a number of small magnets, which arrange themselves according to the attraction of the poles of the original magnet. this experiment is made to the most advantage upon a piece of pasteboard, or paper, placed over the magnet. magnetism is communicated by the friction, or the near position, of a magnet to a piece of steel of a size less than it. for this reason a combination of magnetical bars will have a greater effect than a single one; and in the following manner, beginning without any magnetism at all, the greatest quantity may be procured. six bars of steel may be rendered slightly magnetical by fixing each of them successively to an upright poker, and stroking it several times from the bottom to the top with the lower end of an old pair of tongs. if then four of these bars be joined, the magnetism of the remaining two will be much increased by a proper method of rubbing with them; and by changing their places, joining the strongest, and acting upon the weakest, they may all be made as magnetical as they are capable of being. the strength of a natural magnet may be increased by covering its polar extremities with steel. this is called the _arming_ of the loadstone. to account for the variation of the needle, dr. halley supposed the earth to consist of two parts, an external _shell_ and an internal _nucleus_, detached, and having a revolution distinct from it; and that the action of the poles of the shell and of the nucleus would explain all the varieties in the position of the needle. but others think that the cause of the magnetism of the earth is not _within_, but _without_ itself. one reason for this opinion is, that a magnet is liable to be affected by a strong aurora borealis; and another is, that the variation of the needle proceeds in such manner as supposes that the motion of the nucleus must be quicker than that of the shell of the earth; whereas, since it is most natural to suppose that motion was communicated to the nucleus by the shell, it would be slower. some idea of the quantity and the progress of the variation of the needle may be formed from the following facts.--at the cape of good hope, when it was discovered by the portuguese, in , there was no variation, the needle there pointing due north; in it was about degrees westward, in it was ° w. in about ° w. in about ° w. and in about ½° w. in london, in , the variation was degrees seconds e.; in it was ° e. in it was deg. min. e. in it was nothing at all; in it was deg. min. w. in it was deg. w. in it was about w. and at present it is about w. the longitude may in some places be found by the variation of the needle; and mr. churchman, of america, having given much attention to the subject, comparing the observations of others, and many of his own, thinks that he has found a method of determining the longitude to a great degree of certainty, in most cases, by this means. he says there are two magnetic poles of the earth, one to the north and the other to the south, at different distances from the poles of the earth, and revolving in different times; and from the combined influence of these two poles he deduces rules for the position of the needle in all places of the earth, and at all times, past, present, or to come. the north magnetic pole, he says, makes a complete revolution in years, days, hours, and the south pole in about years. in the beginning of the year the north magnetic pole was in deg. min. north latitude; and in longitude from greenwich deg. east; and the south was in deg. south latitude, and deg. east from greenwich. lecture xxxiv. _of electricity._ electricity is a property belonging to, or capable of being communicated to, all substances whatever; and whereas by some of them it is transmitted with great ease, and by others with much difficulty, they have been divided into two classes, and denominated _conductors_ or _non-conductors_ of electricity. also the latter receiving this power by friction, and other means, are termed _electrics_, and the former _non-electrics_. metals of all kinds, and water, are conductors, though in very different degrees; so also is charcoal. all other substances, and also a perfect vacuum, are non-conductors of electricity. but many of these substances, when they are made very hot, as glass, resin, baked wood, and perhaps all the rest on which the experiment can be made in this state, are conductors. it is the property of all kinds of electrics, when they are rubbed by bodies different from themselves, to attract light substances of all kinds, to exhibit an appearance of _light_, attended with a particular _sound_, on the approach of any conductor; and if the nostrils are presented, they are affected with a _smell_ like that of phosphorus. this attraction is most easily explained by supposing that electricity is produced by a fluid exceedingly elastic, or repulsive of itself, and attracted by all other substances. an electric exhibiting the appearances above mentioned, is said to be _excited_, and some of them, particularly the _tourmaline_, are excited by heating and cooling, as well as by friction. it appears, however, that excitation consists in the mere transferring of electricity from one substance to another, and that the great source of electricity is in the earth. on this account it is necessary to the considerable excitation of any electric, that the substance against which it is rubbed (hence termed _the rubber_) have a communication with the earth, by means of conductors; for if the rubber be _insulated_, that is cut off from all communication with the earth by means of electrics, the friction has but little effect. when insulated bodies have been attracted by, and brought into contact with, an excited electric, they begin to be repelled by it, and also to repel one another; nor will they be attracted again till they have been brought into contact with some conductor communicating with the earth; but after this they will be attracted as at first. if conductors be _insulated_, electric powers may be communicated to them by the approach of excited electrics, or the contact of other electrified bodies. they will then attract light bodies, and give sparks, &c. like the excited electrics themselves. when electricity is strongly communicated to insulated animal bodies, the pulse is quickened, and perspiration increased; and if they receive, or part with, their electricity on a sudden, a painful sensation is felt at the place of communication. but what is more extraordinary, is, that the influence of the brain and nerves upon the muscles seems to be of an electric nature. this is one of the last and most important of all philosophical discoveries. i shall, therefore, give the result of all the observations that have hitherto been made on the subject, in a _series of propositions_, drawn up by an intelligent friend, who has given much more attention to it than i have done. . the nerve of the limb of an animal being laid bare, and surrounded with a piece of sheet lead, or of tinfoil, if a communication be formed between the nerve thus armed and any of the neighbouring muscles, by means of a piece of zinc, strong contractions will be produced in the limb. . if a portion of the nerve which has been laid bare be armed as above, contractions will be produced as powerfully, by forming the communication between the armed and bare part of the nerve, as between the armed part and muscle. . a similar effect is produced by arming a nerve and simply touching the armed part of the nerve with the metallic conductor. . contractions will take place if a muscle be armed, and a communication be formed by means of the conductor between it and a neighbouring nerve. the same effect will be produced if the communication be formed between the armed muscle and another muscle, which is contiguous to it. . contractions may be produced in the limb of an animal by bringing the pieces of metal into contact with each other at some distance from the limb, provided the latter make part of a line of communication between the two metallic conductors. the experiment which proves this is made in the following manner. the amputated limb of an animal being placed upon a table, let the operator hold with one hand the principal nerve, previously laid bare, and in the other let him hold a piece of zinc; let a small plate of lead or silver be then laid upon the table, at some distance from the limb, and a communication be formed, by means of water, between the limb and the part of the table where the metal is lying. if the operator touch the piece of silver with the zinc, contractions will be produced in the limb the moment that the metals come into contact with each other. the same effect will be produced if the two pieces of metal be previously placed in contact, and the operator touch one of them with his finger. this fact was discovered by mr. william cruikshank. . contractions can be produced in the amputated leg of a frog, by putting it into water, and bringing the two metals into contact with each other at a small distance from the limb. . the influence which has passed through, and excited contractions in, one limb, may be made to pass through, and excite contractions in, another limb. in performing this experiment it is necessary to attend to the following circumstances: let two amputated limbs of a frog be taken; let one of them be laid upon a table, and its foot be folded in a piece of silver; let a person lift up the nerve of this limb with a silver probe, and another person hold in his hand a piece of zinc, with which he is to touch the silver including the foot; let the person holding the zinc in one hand catch with the other the nerve of the second limb, and he who touches the nerve of the first limb is to hold in his other hand the foot of the second; let the zinc now be applied to the silver including the foot of the first limb, and contractions will immediately be excited in both limbs. . the heart is the only involuntary muscle in which contractions can be excited by these experiments. . contractions are produced more strongly, the farther the coating is placed from the origin of the nerve. . animals which were almost dead have been found to be considerably revived by exciting this influence. . when these experiments are repeated upon an animal that has been killed by opium, or by the electric shock, very slight contractions are produced; and no contractions whatever will take place in an animal that has been killed by corrosive sublimate, or that has been starved to death. . zinc appears to be the best exciter when applied to gold, silver, molybdena, steel, or copper. the latter metals, however, excite but feeble contractions when applied to each other. next to zinc, in contact with these metals, tin and lead, and silver and lead, appear to be the most powerful exciters. at least two kinds of fishes, the _torpedo_ and the _electrical eel_, have a voluntary power of giving so strong a shock to the water in which they swim, as to affect fishes and other animals which come near them; and by a conducing communication between different parts of these fishes, an electric shock may be given exactly like that of the leyden phial, which will be described hereafter; and if the communication be interrupted, a flash of electric light will be perceived. the growth of vegetables is also quickened by electricity. lecture xxxv. _the same subject continued._ no electric can be excited without producing electric appearances in the body with which it is excited, provided that body be insulated; for this insulated rubber will attract light bodies, give sparks, and make a snapping noise, upon the approach of a conductor, as well as the excited electric. if an insulated conductor be pointed, or if a pointed conductor, communicating with the earth, be held pretty near it, little or no electric appearance will be exhibited, only a light will appear at each of the points during the act of excitation, and a current of air will be sensible from off them both. the effect of pointed bodies is best explained on the supposition of the electric matter in one body repelling that in another; and consequently the electricity belonging to a body with a large surface making a greater resistance to the entrance of foreign electricity than that belonging to a smaller. these two electricities, viz. that of the excited electric, and that of the rubber, though similar to, are the reverse of, one another. a body attracted by the one will be repelled by the other, and they will attract, and in all respects act upon, one another more sensibly than upon other bodies; so that two pieces of glass or silk possessed of contrary electricities will cohere firmly together, and require a considerable force to separate them. these two electricities having been first discovered by producing one of them from glass, and the other from amber, sealing-wax, sulphur, rosin, &c. first obtained the names of _vitreous_ and _resinous_ electricity; and it being afterwards imagined that one of them was a redundancy, and the other a deficiency, of a supposed electric fluid, the former has obtained the name of _positive_, and the latter that of _negative_, electricity; and these terms are now principally in use. positive and negative electricity may be distinguished from each other by the manner in which they appear at the points of bodies. from a pointed body electrified positively, there issues a stream of light, divided into denser streams, at the extremities; whereas, when the point is electrified negatively, the light is more minutely divided, and diffused equally. the former of these is called a _brush_, and the latter a _star_. if a conductor not insulated be brought within the atmosphere (that is the sphere of action) of any electrified body, it acquires the electricity opposite to that of the electrified body, and the nearer it is brought, the stronger opposite electricity does it acquire, till the one receive a spark from the other, and then the electricity of both will be discharged. the electric substance which separates the two conductors possessing these two opposite kinds of electricity, is said to be _charged_. plates of glass are the most convenient for this purpose, and the thinner the plate the greater is the charge it is capable of holding. the conductors contiguous to each side of the glass are called their _coating_. agreeably to the above-mentioned general principle, it is necessary that one side of the charged glass have a communication with the rubber, while the other receives the electricity from the conductor, or with the conductor, while the other receives from the rubber. it follows also, that the two sides of the plate thus charged are always possessed of the two opposite electricities; that side which communicates with the excited electric having the electricity of the electric, and that which communicates with the rubber, that of the rubber. there is, consequently, a very eager attraction between these two electricities with which the different sides of the plate are charged, and when a proper communication is made by means of conductors, a flash of electric light, attended with a report (which is greater or less in proportion to the quantity of electricity communicated to them, and the goodness of the conductors) is perceived between them, and the electricity of both sides is thereby discharged. the substance of the glass itself in, or upon, which these electricities exist, is impervious to electricity, and does not permit them to unite; but if they be very strong, and the plate of glass very thin, they will force a passage through the glass. this, however, always breaks the glass, and renders it incapable of another charge. the flash of light, together with the explosion between the two opposite sides of a charged electric, is generally called the _electric shock_, on account of the disagreeable sensation it gives any animal whose body is made use of to form the communication been them. the electric shock is always found to perform the circuit from one side of the charged glass to the other by the shortest passage through the best conductors. common communicated electricity also observes the same rule in its transmission from one body to another. it has not been found, that the electric shock takes up any sensible space of time in being transmitted to the greatest distances. the electric shock, as also the common electric spark, displaces the air through which it passes; and if its passage from conductor to conductor be interrupted by non-conductors of a moderate thickness, it will rend and tear them in its passage, in such a manner as to exhibit the appearance of a sudden expansion of the air about the center of the shock. if the electric circuit be interrupted, the electric matter, during the discharge, will pass to any other body that lies near its path, and instantly return. this may be called the _lateral explosion_. the effect of this lateral explosion through a brass chain, when the quantity of electricity is very great, will be the discolouring and partial burning of the paper on which it lies. if a great quantity of electricity be accumulated, as in a _battery_, the explosion will pass over the surfaces of imperfect conductors without entering them, and the effect will be a strong _concussion_ of the substance. also the electric matter thus accumulated and condensed will, by its repulsion, form _concentric circles_, which will appear by melting the surface of a flat piece of metal on which the explosion is received. if an electric shock, or strong spark, be made to pass through, or over, the belly of a muscle, it forces it to contract, as in a convulsion. if a strong shock be sent through a small animal body, it will often deprive it instantly of life. when the electric shock is very strong, it will give polarity to magnetic needles, and sometimes it reverses their poles. great shocks, by which animals are killed, are said to hasten putrefaction. electricity and lightning are in all respects the same thing; since every effect of lightning may be imitated by electricity, and every experiment in electricity may be made with lightning, brought down from the clouds by means of insulated pointed rods of metal. lecture xxxvi. _the same subject continued._ three curious and important instruments, which are among the latest improvements in electricity, deserve a particular explanation, and in all of them the effect depends upon the general principles mentioned above, viz. that bodies placed within the influence, or, as it is usually termed, within the atmosphere, of an electrified body, are affected by a contrary electricity, and that these two electricities mutually attract each other. these instruments are the _electrophorus_, the _condenser_ of electricity, and the _doubler_ of it. the electrophorus consists of an insulated conducting plate applied to an insulated electric. if the latter have any electricity communicated to it, for example the negative, the positive electricity of the former will be attracted by it, and consequently the plate will be capable of receiving electricity from any body communicating with the earth; being, in this situation, capable of containing more electricity than its natural quantity. consequently, when it is removed from the lower plate, and the whole of its electricity equally diffused through it, it will appear to have a redundance, and therefore will give a spark to any body communicating with the earth. being then replaced upon the electric, and touched by any body communicating with the earth, it will be again affected as before, and give a spark on being raised; and this process may be continued at pleasure, the electrophorus supplying the place of any other electrical machine. if the conducting plate of the electrophorus be applied to a piece of dry wood, marble, or any other substance through which electricity can pass but very slowly, or if the insulated conducting plate be covered with a piece of thin silk, which will make some resistance to the passage of electricity, and it be then applied to another plate communicating with the earth; and if, in either of these cases, a body with a large surface possessed of a weak electricity be applied to the conducting plate, the weak electricity not being able to overcome the obstruction presented to it, so as to be communicated to the other plate, will affect it with the contrary electricity, and this reacting on the first plate, will condense its electricity on that part of the plate to which it is contiguous; in consequence of which its capacity of receiving electricity will be increased; so that on the separation of the two plates, that electricity which was before condensed, being equally diffused through the whole plate, will have a greater intensity than it had before, attracting light bodies, or even giving a spark, when the body from which it received its electricity was incapable of it. for though it contained a great quantity of electricity, it was diffused through so large a space that its intensity was very small. this instrument is therefore called a _condenser of electricity_. if an insulated plate of metal possessing the smallest degree of electricity be presented very near to another plate communicating with the earth, it will affect this plate with the opposite electricity; and this being, in the same manner, applied to a third plate, will put it into the same state with the first. if then these two plates be joined, and the first plate be presented to either of them, its own electricity being attracted by that of the plate presented, that of the other will be drawn into it, so that its quantity will be doubled. the same process being repeated, will again double the electricity of this plate, till, from being quite insensible to the most exquisite electrometer, it will become very conspicuous, or even give sparks. this instrument is therefore called a _doubler of electricity_, of excellent use in ascertaining the quality of atmospherical electricity when ever so small. if this instrument be so constructed that these three plates can be successively presented to one another by the revolution of one of them on an axis, it is called the _revolving doubler_; and in this form it is most convenient for use. the end. transcriber's note: details of corrections |position |original |correction | | | | | |lecture i, first paragraph |limestone |lime-stone | |lecture i, last paragraph |_attraction_ |_attraction_, | |lecture iii, first paragraph |viz |viz. | |lecture iii, last paragraph | . | | |lecture xvii, penultimate paragraph |dissoved |dissolved | |lecture xix, "of calcareous earth" |hundreth |hundredth | |lecture xxvi, "of semi-metals" |ignates |ignites | |lecture xxviii, first paragraph |animony |antimony | the complete art of making the chemical fulminating objects, _&c. &c. &c._ _entered at stationers' hall._ _the whole secret laid open_, or the complete art of making _the chemical_ fulminating objects, _such as the_ lace, or girt of security, _fulminating letters_, _balls_, _bombs_, garters, cards, spiders, segars, chairs, drawers, boots, shoes, &c. &c. fourth edition. london: published by j. johnston, , cheapside, for the author, , king-street, portman-square, and sold by all booksellers. address to the reader. that chemistry is one of the most sublime sciences is generally acknowledged; to it may be ascribed the brilliant discoveries lately made in the arts and sciences, and without whose aid the wonderful phenomena, which are the subject of the following pages, could never have been discovered. the author has for some time observed the wonder occasioned by the introduction of the chemical _fulminating objects_ to the public: they are indeed objects of wonder, and when it is considered how trifling a portion of matter it requires to produce effects so surprising, we cannot but hail that science as truly grand, which can create such rare productions, from what we daily handle, with such safety and unconcern, and without which we should be at a loss to carry on our intercourse in trade; i mean silver, which is the basis of all the objects presented to view. i have long seen with astonishment the manufacture of these objects, and the knowledge of that manufacture confined to very few persons, and i considered that it could not but be very much wished by all who had witnessed these astonishing productions, to acquire a true knowledge of how, and by what means, they were produced; i therefore examined them minutely, and having discovered their composition, i have given them to the public in an entire and perfect form, accompanied with patterns of the most difficult, and have enlarged them by several objects of my own invention. that they will be found an innocent amusement, as well as a safeguard, need not be doubted, and also tend to exemplify the astonishing powers of chemistry, the study of which i would earnestly recommend to all who have not studied that science, and to those who have, to continue it with a steady perseverance. it is a study in itself truly sublime, it is highly conducive to morality, and tends most materially to convince every wavering or doubting mind, that the world we inhabit, and all its necessaries, its conveniences, its luxuries, and its blessings, are the work of that divine author "who sees, with equal eye, as god of all, a hero perish, or a sparrow fall." _pope._ having said thus much, i can only assure my reader, that by adhering to the rules i have laid down in the following pages, they may enjoy a rational and innocent employment of time, and be able to inform learned enquirers the nature and properties of the objects of their leisure hours' amusement, and that it may inspire them with a thirst for nearer acquaintance with chemical truths, is the sincere wish of the author. _march , ._ _general_ observations. in pointing out the method of forming the fulminating objects i have endeavoured to be as explicit as possible; and i feel a confidence that every necessary information is here contained. the reason why i sometimes mention fulminating silver, and at others preface it by brugnatelli's, is, that there are two kinds: one sold under the name of fulminating silver, the other called brugnatelli's fulminating silver. the quantities here directed for each object must be strictly adhered to, as it is of too dangerous a nature to be increased in quantity, without the risk of accident. i must also beg great care will be observed in handling it, both before and after the objects are manufactured: with a trifling degree of caution, no accident can possibly occur; all that is required is to avoid heat and friction, as either in excess produces instant detonation. it is also necessary to guard against exploding the objects near the eyes; these precautions observed, no danger need be apprehended. the best place to purchase the principal materials are the undermentioned places: for the fulminating silver, and brugnatelli's ditto, is messrs. accum and garden, old compton-street, london, and every other manufacturing chemist; the glass globes, of all sizes, are to be had of f. pastorelli, barometer and thermometer manufacturer, no. , cross-street, hatton-garden, london. the spiders are to be had of most glass blowers--for the cards, &c. every one is aware where to apply. the glass composition is made as follows: take one ounce of gum arabic, and dissolve it in a quarter of a pint of water, boil it till tolerably thick, and then add as much coarse powdered glass as will form a very thick composition. n.b. when the glass composition cannot be conveniently obtained, glass paper may be used, pasted in the same way as directed for the composition. complete art, &c. the lace, _or girt of security_. the lace or girt is made of strong brace-web, after the manner and size of the paper pattern enclosed; the parts marked with ink are to be covered with the glass composition, to be laid on tolerably thick--say the thickness of a three shilling piece, and about an eighth of an inch broad in each place; let it remain until quite dry, and then sew it in like manner as the pattern, and from one to one grain and a half of fulminating silver to be enclosed in the part marked s; a piece of paper or silk well pasted on one side is then to be wrapped twice round in the same manner as the paper in the pattern is pinned; a strong lace-hole is then to be worked at each end--the manner of applying it is to hang it on two hooks, one on the door post, and the other on the door, taking care to place the part in such a position as to come in contact with the edge of the door, on its being opened, which will cause an immediate explosion louder than a musket. hooks may also be placed on windows or shutters, and the lace being hung on them will produce the same effect: a greater safeguard against midnight intruders has never been discovered. fulminating letters. the letter inclosed is a pattern of the manner in which they are put together, an examination of which will give the true idea to every attentive observer: a sheet of paper should be used doubled, and cut according to pattern; two slips of parchment must be used instead of those of paper, as enclosed in the pattern letter. the ends marked with ink must be slightly covered with glass composition, and about an eighth of an inch wide, they must then be laid separately to dry, and when quite dry they must be sewn at one edge as shewn in the pattern, you must then put one third of a grain of brugnatelli's fulminating silver in between the parts marked s, a piece of coloured paper or ribbon is then to be pasted well on one side, and wound twice round in the same way as the paper is now pinned round. the parchment slips thus prepared, must be pasted at each end for about an inch, and so fastened to the letter marked with a cross; the letter is then to be folded, and no further sealing is required. it must here be observed, that although the pattern is in miniature, the directions here given are intended for a common size letter; all that is required to make it so, being to use longer strips of parchment, taking care that the parchment is always as long as the letter is wide. this letter may be sent to any part of the world, and on its being opened will cause a report nearly as loud as a pistol: it is consequently well adapted to prove a never-failing source of amusement. _fulminating_ balls & bombs. the ball comprises a glass globe rather larger than a pea, having a small aperture, into which should be put from one third to half a grain of brugnatelli's fulminating silver: a piece of paper is then to be pasted carefully all over the ball, in order to cover the glass and prevent the escape of the silver.--the method of using the balls is to throw them down smartly, or to place one under the ball of the heel and tread hard upon it, which causes an explosion equal to a pistol and free from danger; the latter method of using them is generally preferred, and is assuredly the most certain. * * * * * a bomb consists of the same materials as a ball, only on a larger scale: the globe for a bomb is the size of a common nut, and the quantity of brugnatelli's fulminating silver is from one grain to one grain and a half, according to the report wished to be produced. the way of applying bombs is by throwing them down with violence, and it should here be remembered that this is the less exceptionable method of using them: they should on no occasion be used, without apprising the bye-standers, nor must they ever be pressed on by the foot; as the shock produced by the detonation would be rather too violent. fulminating spiders. the spider is formed after the manner of the common spider, it has a glass body, into which is put one third of a grain of fulminating silver. the manner of using: being formed in every respect so as to resemble the spider, they may be left on the ground, in closets, or on any article of wearing apparel, from whence they will consequently soon be dislodged, and from the natural antipathy towards this disagreeable insect, there can be no doubt of its being soon trod upon, when, to the no small surprise of the treader, a report equal to that of a pistol will be produced.--many persons apply them to ladies' dresses, but from the well-known delicacy of female nerves, it were better perhaps to abstain from this experiment. observe, the spiders cannot be exploded but by pressure, which is best done by the foot. fulminating cards & segars. the card is of the pattern herein enclosed; it must be opened at one end with a pen-knife, as here shewn, into which opening put one-fourth, or one-third of a grain at most, of fulminating silver; the edges are then to be pasted slightly, and closed together; a notch should also be cut at the other end, as in the pattern. when dry it will be complete for use. the manner of using, is to take it by the notched end, and light the square end at the candle, when a sharp detonation ensues.--the card should be three quarters of an inch wide, and from four to five inches in length. cards thus prepared, have long sold in paris under the denomination of "detonating cards." * * * * * the segar is made by just opening the end of a common segar, (which may be had at all tobacconists) and gently placing within it one-fourth of a grain of fulminating silver between the leaves, the end is then to be closed again, and care taken to close it, so as to prevent the powder falling out. this, on being set fire to, causes a loud explosion, and not a little disconcerts the nerves of the smoker; nor does it fail to move the risible features of the lookers-on. * * * * * the segar, when exploded, may be smoked with perfect safety. _fulminating pins._ take one third of a grain of brugnatelli's fulminating silver, and enclose in a very small fold of paper; this enclose in a second paper, which has been previously pasted, and then let it be wrapped or times round a common pin, observing to leave the point clear.--pins, thus prepared, may be stuck in the wick of the candle, in the candle itself, or thrown into the fire, and immediately on their taking fire a loud explosion will follow. observe, not to place them too near any person's eyes, least, on an explosion, the pins should be thrown out, which might prove unpleasant. _fulminating_ wax tapers. these tapers are prepared by taking off a small part of the wax, near the tip of the wick, and putting one-third of a grain of fulminating silver in the wick, then replace the wax, and on its taking fire, a loud detonation will be produced. fulminating garters. the garter is formed of common tape, or of the common worsted binding, which should not exceed the length and breadth of the enclosed pattern; the parts marked with ink are to be covered with the glass composition in the same manner as directed for the lace of security; suffer it to remain till quite dry, and then sew it together as in the pattern; half a grain of the fulminating silver is then to be placed between the parts marked s, and a piece of paper or ribbon, well pasted on one side, is to be wrapped twice round in the same way as directed for the lace. the manner of applying it is, to take one end in each hand, and by suddenly pulling it, a loud report will be given, equal to a large pistol.--this experiment may also be performed by offering one end to another person, and requesting them to pull against you, or by giving them the garter, and desiring them to use it as first directed. keep the garter below the eyes. _fulminating chairs_ are thus prepared: enclose half a grain of brugnatelli's fulminating silver in a piece of glass paper, and that should be again enclosed in a square piece of tinfoil; this doubled in a very small compass may be placed immediately under the foot of a chair, and the chair placed very lightly upon it, or pasting it would be much better; be careful to stand the chair down very gently: on any one's setting down on a chair so prepared, a loud detonation will follow.--this experiment is particularly innocent, and may be productive of much mirth. fulminating _drawers_. the preparation for the drawers is the same as used for the chairs: it should be pasted directly under the drawer, or on the side; if the drawer be left partly open, the effect will more certainly be produced: on the drawer being opened or shut, a loud explosion will be caused. this experiment is also perfectly harmless, and as there could be no suspicion of the trick, it cannot fail to prove the source of much amusement, to create great surprise, and to cause many whimsical conjectures as to the origin of the wonderful phenomenon. _fulminating_ snuffers. one fourth of a grain of fulminating silver is to be inclosed in a small piece of paper, and put inside the snuffers; on the snuffers being applied to the candle, a smart report will follow. be careful to notice, that the snuffers are quite cold when the paper is introduced, as the heat would cause it to explode sooner than might be thought agreeable. fulminating boots & shoes. these are prepared by enclosing half a grain of brugnatelli's fulminating silver in a fold of glass paper, and pasting it in the middle of a piece of court plaster; if the edges of the court plaster are then slightly wet, it will adhere, and must be placed in the middle of the heel of a boot or shoe, and by being pressed upon will detonate loudly. observe, it must be fastened on the outside of the heel. this experiment may be easily accomplished, while you are left alone, in any apartment where boots or shoes are kept, and would cause a tolerable degree of astonishment to the wearer, on his placing his foot to the ground. fulminating _pipe lights_. these lights are made by inserting one-third of a grain of fulminating silver, in one end of a piece of hemp-stalk, in the same way as directed for the segars. a piece of stout deal shaving might be used, prepared in the same manner as directed for the fulminating cards. be careful to notice, that, whatever is used, has some particular mark attached to it, so as to point out which end is to be lighted. _fulminating_ walking sticks. these may be made by inclosing half a grain of brugnatelli's fulminating silver in a small fold of glass paper, and putting it into a ferule, which ferule may be placed gently on the stick; and on its being applied to the ground, a loud explosion will take place. * * * * * a vast number of other fulminating objects might be prepared by the same means as here used, as it must have been observed, the silver detonates either by friction or heat. but great attention must be paid to the quantity of fulminating silver used, as very unpleasant consequences might arise from the use of too large a quantity; and on the other hand, no effect produced by too small a quantity; but from one fourth to half a grain will most commonly be found quite sufficient for those purposes that require handling; and here again let me impress it on the mind, how necessary it is to pay attention to the quantities i have here specified for each object: and let me request that it may in no one instance be exceeded. finis. _printed by t. hamblin, garlick hill, thames street._ none none [transcriber's notes: the following errors are noted, but have not been corrected: page , footnote: "plutomium" should be "plutonium" page : "knowns" should be "knows" in element names, {} represents subscripted numbers and <> represents superscripted numbers. readers may also refer to the html version of the text, in which super and subscripted numbers are represented visually. italic emphasis is indicated by surrounding the word with _underscores_. greek letters in the original text are marked in brackets, e. g. [alpha] or [gamma]. table i (the transuranium elements) has been moved from pages - , in the middle of the book, to the end of the text.] a brief history of element discovery, synthesis, and analysis glen w. watson september [illustration] lawrence radiation laboratory university of california berkeley and livermore operating under contract with the united states atomic energy commission [illustration: radioactive elements: alpha particles from a speck of radium leave tracks on a photographic emulsion. (occhialini and powell, )] a brief history of element discovery, synthesis, and analysis it is well known that the number of elements has grown from four in the days of the greeks to at present, but the change in methods needed for their discovery is not so well known. up until , only naturally occurring elements had been discovered. it took a dramatic modern technique (based on ernest o. lawrence's nobel-prize-winning atom smasher, the cyclotron) to synthesize the most recently discovered elements. most of these recent discoveries are directly attributed to scientists working under the atomic energy commission at the university of california's radiation laboratory at berkeley. but it is apparent that our present knowledge of the elements stretches back into history: back to england's ernest rutherford, who in proved that, occasionally, when an alpha particle from radium strikes a nitrogen atom, either a proton or a hydrogen nucleus is ejected; to the dane niels bohr and his idea of electron orbits; to a once unknown swiss patent clerk, albert einstein, and his now famous theories; to poland's marie curie who, in , with her french husband pierre laboriously isolated polonium and radium; back to the french scientist h. a. becquerel, who first discovered something he called a "spontaneous emission of penetrating rays from certain salts of uranium"; to the german physicist w. k. roentgen and his discovery of x rays in ; and back still further. during this passage of scientific history, the very idea of "element" has undergone several great changes. the early greeks suggested earth, air, fire, and water as being the essential material from which all others were made. aristotle considered these as being combinations of four properties: hot, cold, dry, and moist (see fig. ). [illustration: fig. . the elements as proposed by the early greeks.] later, a fifth "essence," ether, the building material of the heavenly bodies was added. paracelsus ( - ) introduced the three alchemical symbols salt, sulfur, and mercury. sulfur was the principle of combustability, salt the fixed part left after burning (calcination), and mercury the essential part of all metals. for example, gold and silver were supposedly different combinations of sulfur and mercury. robert boyle in his "sceptical chymist" ( ) first defined the word element in the sense which it retained until the discovery of radioactivity ( ), namely, a form of matter that could not be split into simpler forms. the first discovery of a true element in historical time was that of phosphorus by dr. brand of hamburg, in . brand kept his process secret, but, as in modern times, knowledge of the element's existence was sufficient to let others, like kunkel and boyle in england, succeed independently in isolating it shortly afterward. as in our atomic age, a delicate balance was made between the "light-giving" (desirable) and "heat-giving" (feared) powers of a discovery. an early experimenter was at first "delighted with the white, waxy substance that glowed so charmingly in the dark of his laboratory," but later wrote, "i am not making it any more for much harm may come of it." robert boyle wrote in of phosphorus, "it shone so briskly and lookt so oddly that the sight was extreamly pleasing, having in it a mixture of strangeness, beauty and frightfulness." these words describe almost exactly the impressions of eye witnesses of the first atom bomb test at alamagordo, new mexico, july , . for the next two and three-quarters centuries the chemists had much fun and some fame discovering new elements. frequently there was a long interval between discovery and recognition. thus scheele made chlorine in by the action of "black manganese" (manganese dioxide) on concentrated muriatic acid (hydrochloric acid), but it was not recognized as an element till the work of davy in . occasionally the development of a new technique would lead to the "easy" discovery of a whole group of new elements. thus davy, starting in , applied the method of electrolysis, using a development of volta's pile as a source of current; in a short time he discovered aluminum, barium, boron, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, and strontium. the invention of the spectroscope by bunsen and kirchhoff in provided a new tool which could establish the purity of substances already known and lead to the discovery of others. thus, helium was discovered in the sun's spectrum by jansen and isolated from uranite by ramsay in . the discovery of radioactivity by becquerel in (touched off by roentgen's discovery of x rays the year before) gave an even more sensitive method of detecting the presence or absence of certain kinds of matter. it is well known that pierre and marie curie used this new-found radioactivity to identify the new elements polonium and radium. compounds of these new elements were obtained by patient fractional recrystallization of their salts. the "explanation" of radioactivity led to the discovery of isotopes by rutherford and soddy in , and with this discovery a revision of our idea of elements became necessary. since boyle, it had been assumed that all atoms of the individual elements were identical and unlike any others, and could not be changed into anything simpler. now it became evident that the atoms of radioactive elements were constantly changing into other elements, thereby releasing very large amounts of energy, and that many different forms of the same element (lead was the first studied) were possible. we now think of an element as a form of matter in which all atoms have the same nuclear charge. the human mind has always sought order and simplification of the external world; in chemistry the fruitful classifications were dobereiner's triads ( ), newland's law of octaves ( ), and mendeleev's periodic law ( ). the chart expressing this periodic law seemed to indicate the maximum extent of the elements and gave good hints "where to look for" and "the probable properties of" the remaining ones (see fig. ). by , all but four of the slots in the -place file had been filled. the vacancies were at , , , and . [illustration: fig. . periodic chart of the elements ( )] workers using traditional analytical techniques continued to search for these elements, but their efforts were foredoomed to failure. none of the nuclei of the isotopes of elements , , , and are stable; hence weighable quantities of them do not exist in nature, and new techniques had to be developed before we could really say we had "discovered" them. in , rutherford accomplished scientifically what medieval alchemists had failed to do with "magic" experiments and other less sophisticated techniques. it wasn't gold (the goal of the alchemists) he found but something more valuable with even greater potential for good and evil: a method of transmuting one element into another. by bombarding nitrogen nuclei with alpha particles from radium, he found that nitrogen was changed into oxygen. the process for radioactive transmutation is somewhat like a common chemical reaction. an alpha particle, which has the same charge (+ ) and atomic mass ( ) as a helium nucleus, penetrates the repulsive forces of the nitrogen nucleus and deposits one proton and one neutron; this changes the nitrogen atom into an oxygen atom. the reaction is written { }n< > + { }he< > --> { }h< > + { }o< >. the number at the lower left of each element symbol in the above reaction is the proton number. this number determines the basic chemical identity of an atom, and it is this number scientists must change before one element can be transformed into another. the common way to accomplish this artificially is by bombarding nuclei with nuclear projectiles. rutherford used naturally occurring alpha particles from radium as his projectiles because they were the most effective he could then find. but these natural alpha particles have several drawbacks: they are positively charged, like the nucleus itself, and are therefore more or less repulsed depending on the proton number of the element being bombarded; they do not move fast enough to penetrate the nuclei of heavier elements (those with many protons); and, for various other reasons (some of them unexplained), are inefficient in breaking up the nucleus. it is estimated that only out of , of these alpha particles will react with nitrogen. physicists immediately began the search for artificial means to accelerate a wider variety of nuclear particles to high energies. protons, because they have a + charge rather than the + charge of the alpha particles, are repulsed less strongly by the positive charge on the nucleus, and are therefore more useful as bombarding projectiles. in , e. t. s. walton and j. d. cockcroft passed an electric discharge through hydrogen gas, thereby removing electrons from the hydrogen atom; this left a beam of protons (i. e., hydrogen ions), which was then accelerated by high voltages. this cockcroft-walton voltage multiplier accelerated the protons to fairly high energies (about , electron volts), but the protons still had a plus charge and their energies were still not high enough to overcome the repulsive forces (coulombic repulsion) of the heavier nuclei. a later development, the van de graaff electrostatic generator, produced a beam of hydrogen ions and other positively charged ions, and electrons at even higher energies. an early model of the linear accelerator also gave a beam of heavy positive ions at high energies. these were the next two instruments devised in the search for efficient bombarding projectiles. however, the impasse continued: neither instrument allowed scientists to crack the nuclei of the heavier elements. ernest o. lawrence's cyclotron, built in , was the first device capable of accelerating positive ions to the very high energies needed. its basic principle of operation is not difficult to understand. a charged particle accelerated in a cyclotron is analogous to a ball being whirled on a string fastened to the top of a pole. a negative electric field attracts the positively charged particle (ball) towards it and then switches off until the particle swings halfway around; the field then becomes negative in front of the particle again, and again attracts it. as the particle moves faster and faster it spirals outward in an ever increasing circle, something like a tether ball unwinding from a pole. the energies achieved would have seemed fantastic to earlier scientists. the bevatron, a modern offspring of the first cyclotron, accelerates protons to . % the speed of light, thereby giving them . billion electron volts (bev). another instrument, the heavy-ion linear accelerator (hilac), accelerates ions as heavy as neon to about % the speed of light. it is called a linear accelerator because it accelerates particles in a straight line. stanford university is currently ( ) in the process of building a linear accelerator approximately two miles long which will accelerate charged particles to . % the speed of light. but highly accelerated charged particles did not solve all of science's questions about the inner workings of the nucleus. in , during the early search for more efficient ways to bombard nuclei, james chadwick discovered the neutron. this particle, which is neutral in charge and is approximately the same mass as a proton, has the remarkable quality of efficiently producing nuclear reactions even at very low energies. no one exactly knowns why. at low energies, protons, alpha particles, or other charged particles do not interact with nuclei because they cannot penetrate the electrostatic energy barriers. for example, slow positive particles pick up electrons, become neutral, and lose their ability to cause nuclear transformations. slow neutrons, on the other hand, can enter nearly all atomic nuclei and induce fission of certain of the heavier ones. it is, in fact, these properties of the neutron which have made possible the utilization of atomic energy. with these tools, researchers were not long in accurately identifying the missing elements , , , and and more--indeed, the list of new elements, isotopes, and particles now seems endless. element was "made" for the first time as a result of bombarding molybdenum with deuterons in the berkeley cyclotron. the chemical work of identifying the element was done by emilio segrè and others then working at palermo, sicily, and they chose to call it technetium, because it was the element first made by artificial technical methods. element was made for the first time from the fission disintegration products of uranium in the clinton (oak ridge) reactor. marinsky and glendenin, who did the chemical work of identification, chose to call it promethium because they wished to point out that just as prometheus stole fire (a great force for good or evil) from the hidden storehouse of the gods and presented it to man, so their newly assembled reactor delivered to mankind an even greater force, nuclear energy. element is called astatine, from the greek astatos, meaning "unstable," because astatine _is_ unstable (of course all other elements having a nuclear charge number greater than are unstable, too). astatine was first made at berkeley by bombarding bismuth with alpha particles, which produced astatine and released two neutrons. the element has since been found in nature as a small constituent of the natural decay of actinium. the last of the original elements to be discovered was element , francium. it was identified in by french scientist marguerite perey. children have a game in which they pile blocks up to see how high they can go before they topple over. in medieval times, petty rulers in their italian states vied with one another to see who could build the tallest tower. some beautiful results of this game still remain in florence, siena, and other italian hill cities. currently, americans vie in a similar way with the wheelbase and overall length of their cars. after , the game among scientists took the form of seeing who could extend the length of the periodic system of the elements; as with medieval towers, it was italy that again began with the most enthusiasm and activity under the leadership of enrico fermi. merely adding neutrons would not be enough; that would make only a heavier isotope of the already known heaviest elements, uranium. however, if the incoming neutron caused some rearrangement within the nucleus and if it were accompanied by expulsion of electrons, that _would_ make a new element. trials by fermi and his co-workers with various elements led to unmistakeable evidence of the expulsion of electrons (beta activity) with at least four different rates of decay (half-lives). claims were advanced for the creation of elements and and possibly further (the transuranium elements, table i). much difficulty was experienced, however, in proving that the activity really was due to the formation of elements and . as more people became interested and extended the scope of the experiments, the picture became more confused rather than clarified. careful studies soon showed that the activities did _not_ decay logarithmically--which means that they were caused by mixtures, not individual pure substances--and the original four activities reported by fermi grew to at least nine. as a matter of fact, the way out of the difficulty had been indicated soon after fermi's original announcement. dr. ida noddack pointed out that no one had searched among the products of fermi's experiment for elements _lighter_ than lead, but no one paid any attention to her suggestion at the time. the matter was finally cleared up by dr. otto hahn and f. strassmann. they were able to show that instead of uranium having small pieces like helium nuclei, fast electrons, and super-hard x-rays, knocked off as expected, the atom had split into two roughly equal pieces, together with some excess neutrons. this process is called nuclear fission. the two large pieces were unstable and decayed further with the loss of electrons, hence the [beta] activity. this process is so complicated that there are not, as originally reported, only four half-lives, but at least different varieties of at least different elements. the discovery of fission attended by the release of enormous amounts of energy led to feverish activity on the part of physicists and chemists everywhere in the world. in june , mcmillan and abelson presented definite proof that element had been found in uranium penetrated by neutrons during deuteron bombardment in the cyclotron at the university of california radiation laboratory. the california scientists called the newly discovered element neptunium, because it lies beyond the element uranium just as the planet neptune lies beyond uranus. the particular isotope formed in those first experiments was { }np< >; this is read neptunium having a nuclear charge of and an atomic mass number of . it has a half-life of . days, during which it gives up another electron ([beta] particle) and becomes element , or plutonium (so called after pluto, the next planet beyond neptune). this particular form of plutonium ({ }pu< >) has such a long half-life ( , years) that it could not be detected. the first isotope of element to be discovered was pu< >, made by direct deuteron bombardment in the berkeley -inch cyclotron by radiation laboratory scientists seaborg, mcmillan, kennedy, and wahl; it had an [alpha]-decay half-life of . years, which gave it sufficient radioactivity so that its chemistry could be studied. having found these chemical properties in pu< >, experimenters knew { }pu< > would behave similarly. it was soon shown that the nucleus of { }pu< > would undergo fission in the same way as { }u< > when bombarded with slow neutrons and that it could be produced in the newly assembled atomic pile. researchers wished to learn as much as possible about its chemistry; therefore, during the summer of two large cyclotrons at st. louis and berkeley bombarded hundreds of pounds of uranium almost continuously. this resulted in the formation of micrograms of plutonium. from this small amount, enough of the chemical properties of the element were learned to permit correct design of the huge plutonium-recovery plant at hanford, washington. in the course of these investigations, balances that would weigh up to . mg with a sensitivity of . microgram were developed. the "test tubes" and "beakers" used had internal diameters of . to mm and could measure volumes of / to / , ml with an accuracy of %. the fact that there was no intermediate stage of experimentation, but a direct scale-up at hanford of ten billion times, required truly heroic skill and courage. by sufficient plutonium was available from uranium piles (reactors) so that it was available as target material for cyclotrons. at berkeley it was bombarded with -mev doubly charged helium ions, and the following reactions took place: { }pu< > ([alpha], n) { }cm< > [alpha] / days --> { }pu< >. this is to be read: plutonium having an atomic number of ( positively charged protons in the nucleus) and a mass number of (the whole atom weighs approximately times as much as a proton), when bombarded with alpha particles (positively charged helium nuclei) reacts to give off a neutron and a new element, curium, that has atomic number and mass number . this gives off alpha particles at such a rate that half of it has decomposed in days, leaving plutonium with atomic number and mass number . the radiochemical work leading to the isolation and identification of the atoms of element was done at the metallurgical laboratory of the university of chicago. the intense neutron flux available in modern reactors led to a new element, americium (am), as follows: { }pu< > (n, [gamma]) { }pu< > (n, [gamma]) { }pu< > [beta] --> { }am< >. the notation (n, [gamma]) means that the plutonium absorbs a neutron and gives off some energy in the form of gamma rays (very hard x rays); it first forms { }pu< > and then { }pu< >, which is unstable and gives off fast electrons ([beta]), leaving { }am< >. berkelium and californium, elements and , were produced at the university of california by methods analogous to that used for curium, as shown in the following equations: { }am< > + [alpha] --> { }bk< > + { }n< >, and { }cm< > + [alpha] --> { }cf< > + { }n< >. the next two elements, einsteinium ({ }es) and fermium ({ }fm), were originally found in the debris from the thermonuclear device "mike," which was detonated on eniwetok atoll november . (this method of creating new substances is somewhat more extravagant than the mythical chinese method of burning down a building to get a roast pig.) these elements have since been made in nuclear reactors and by bombardment. this time the "bullet" was n< > stripped of electrons till it had a charge of + , and the target was plutonium. researchers at the university of california used new techniques in forming and identifying element , mendelevium. a very thin layer of { }es< > was electroplated onto a thin gold foil and was then bombarded, from behind the layer, with -mev [alpha] particles. unchanged { }es< > stayed on the gold, but those atoms hit by [alpha] particles were knocked off and deposited on a "catcher" gold foil, which was then dissolved and analyzed (fig. ). this freed the new element from most of the very reactive parent substances, so that analysis was easier. even so, the radioactivity was so weak that the new element was identified "one atom at a time"; this is possible because its daughter element, fermium, spontaneously fissions and releases energy in greater bursts than any possible contaminant. [illustration: fig. . the production of mendelevium.] in , in stockholm, element was reported found by an international team of scientists (who called it nobelium), but diligent and extensive research failed to duplicate the stockholm findings. however, a still newer technique developed at berkeley showed the footprints--if not the living presence--of (see fig. ). the rare isotope curium- is coated on a small piece of nickel foil, enclosed in a helium-filled container, and placed in the heavy-ion linear accelerator (hilac) beam. positively charged atoms of element are knocked off the foil by the beam, which is of carbon- or carbon- nuclei, and are deposited on a negatively charged conveyor apron. but element doesn't live long enough to be actually measured. as it decays, its daughter product, { }fm< >, is attracted onto a charged aluminum foil where it can be analyzed. the researchers have decided that the hen really did come first: they have the egg; therefore the hen must have existed. by measuring the time distance between target and daughter product, they figure that the hen-mother (element ) must have a half-life of three seconds. [illustration: fig. . the experimental arrangement used in the discovery of element .] in an experiment completed in , researchers at the university of california at berkeley unearthed similar "footprints" belonging to element (named lawrencium in honor of nobel prizewinner ernest o. lawrence). they found that the bombardment of californium with boron ions released [alpha] particles which had an energy of . mev and decayed with a half-life of ± seconds. these particles can only be produced by element , which, according to one scientific theory, is a type of "dinosaur" of matter that died out a few weeks after creation of the universe. the half-life of lawrencium (lw) is about seconds, and its mass number is thought to be , although further research is required to establish this conclusively. research on lawrencium is complicated. its total [alpha] activity amounts to barely a few counts per hour. and, since scientists had the [alpha]-particle "footprints" only and not the beast itself, the complications increased. therefore no direct chemical techniques could be used, and element was the first to be discovered solely by nuclear methods.[a] for many years the periodic system was considered closed at . it has now been extended by at least eleven places (table i), and one of the extensions (plutonium) has been made in truckload lots. its production and use affect the life of everyone in the united states and most of the world. surely the end is again in sight, at least for ordinary matter, although persistent scientists may shift their search to the other-world "anti" particles. these, too, will call for very special techniques for detection of their fleeting presence. early enthusiastic researchers complained that a man's life was not long enough to let him do all the work he would like on an element. the situation has now reached a state of equilibrium; neither man nor element lives long enough to permit all the desired work. [a] in august russian scientists claimed that they created element with a half-life of about . seconds by bombarding plutomium with accelerated neon- ions. table i. the transuranium elements ======================================================================== element name (symbol) mass year discovered; by whom; number where; how ------------------------------------------------------------------------ neptunium (np) ; e. m. mcmillan, p. h. abelson; university of california at berkeley; slow-neutron bombardment of u< > in the -inch cyclotron. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ plutonium (pu) ; j. w. kennedy, e. m. mcmillan, g. t. seaborg, and a. c. wahl; university of california at berkeley; -mev deuteron bombardment of u< > in the -inch cyclotron. (pu) pu< >; the fissionable isotope of plutonium, was also discovered in by j. w. kennedy, g. t. seaborg, e. segrè and a. c. wahl; university of california at berkeley; slow-neutron bombardment of u< > in the -inch cyclotron. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ americium (am) - ; berkeley scientists a. ghiorso, r. a. james, l. o. morgan, and g. t. seaborg at the university of chicago; intense neutron bombardment of plutonium in nuclear reactors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ curium (cm) ; berkeley scientists a. ghiorso, r. a. james, and g. t. seaborg at the university of chicago; bombardment of pu< > by -mev helium ions from the -inch cyclotron. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ berkelium (bk) ; s. g. thompson, a. ghiorso, and g. t. seaborg; university of california at berkeley; -mev helium-ion bombardment of am< >. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ californium (cf) ; s. g. thompson, k. street, a. ghiorso, g. t. seaborg; university of california at berkeley; -mev helium-ion bombardment of cm< >. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ einsteinium (es) - ; a. ghiorso, s. g. fermium (fm) thompson, g. h. higgins, g. t. seaborg, m. h. studier, p. r. fields, s. m. fried, h. diamond, j. f. mech, g. l. pyle, j. r. huizenga, a. hirsch, w. m. manning, c. i. browne, h. l. smith, r. w. spence; "mike" explosion in south pacific; work done at university of california at berkeley, los alamos scientific laboratory, and argonne national laboratory; both elements created by multiple capture of neutrons in uranium of first detonation of a thermonuclear device. the elements were chemically isolated from the debris of the explosion. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ mendelevium (md) ; a. ghiorso, b. g. harvey, g. r. choppin, s. g. thompson, g. t. seaborg; university of california at berkeley; -mev helium-ion bombardment of es< > in -inch cyclotron. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ unnamed[b] ; a. ghiorso, t. sikkeland, a. e. larsh, r. m. latimer; university of california, lawrence radiation laboratory, berkeley; -mev carbon-ion bombardment of cm< > in heavy-ion linear accelerator (hilac). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ lawrencium ; a. ghiorso, t. sikkeland, a. e. larsh, r. m. latimer; university of california, lawrence radiation laboratory, berkeley; -mev boron-ion bombardment of cf< >, cf< >, and cf< > in hilac. ======================================================================== [b] a claim for the synthesis and identification of element was accepted at that time by the international union of pure and applied chemistry, and the name nobelium (symbol no) was adopted. the university of california scientists, a. ghiorso et al., cited here believe they have disproved the earlier claim and have the right to suggest a different name for the element. familiar letters on chemistry, and its relation to commerce, physiology, and agriculture, by justus liebig, m.d., ph. d., f.r.s., professor of chemistry in the university of giessen. edited by john gardner, m.d., member of the chemical society. second edition, corrected. london: mdcccxliv. preface the letters contained in this little volume embrace some of the most important points of the science of chemistry, in their application to natural philosophy, physiology, agriculture, and commerce. some of them treat of subjects which have already been, or will hereafter be, more fully discussed in my larger works. they were intended to be mere sketches, and were written for the especial purpose of exciting the attention of governments, and an enlightened public, to the necessity of establishing schools of chemistry, and of promoting, by every means, the study of a science so intimately connected with the arts, pursuits, and social well-being of modern civilised nations. for my own part i do not scruple to avow the conviction, that ere long, a knowledge of the principal truths of chemistry will be expected in every educated man, and that it will be as necessary to the statesman, the political economist, and the practical agriculturist, as it is already indispensable to the physician, and the manufacturer. in germany, such of these letters as have been already published, have not failed to produce some of the results anticipated. new professorships have been established in the universities of goettingen and wuertzburg, for the express purpose of facilitating the application of chemical truths to the practical arts of life, and of following up the new line of investigation and research--the bearing of chemistry upon physiology, medicine, and agriculture,--which may be said to be only just begun. my friend, dr. ernest dieffenbach, one of my first pupils, who is well acquainted with all the branches of chemistry, physics, natural history, and medicine, suggested to me that a collection of these letters would be acceptable to the english public, which has so favourably received my former works. i readily acquiesced in the publication of an english edition, and undertook to write a few additional letters, which should embrace some conclusions i have arrived at, in my recent investigations, in connection with the application of chemical science to the physiology of plants and agriculture. my esteemed friend, dr. gardner, has had the kindness to revise the manuscript and the proof sheets for publication, for which i cannot refrain expressing my best thanks. it only remains for me to add a hope, that this little offering may serve to make new friends to our beautiful and useful science, and be a remembrancer to those old friends who have, for many years past, taken a lively interest in all my labours. justus liebig giessen, aug. . contents letter i the subject proposed. materials employed for chemical apparatus:-- glass--caoutchouc--cork--platinum. the balance. the "elements" of the ancients, represent the forms of matter. lavoisier and his successors. study of the materials composing the earth. synthetic production of minerals--lapis lazuli. organic chemistry. letter ii changes of form which every kind of matter undergoes. conversion of gases into liquids and solids. carbonic acid--its curious properties in a solid state. condensation of gases by porous bodies. by spongy platinum. importance of this property in nature. letter iii the manufacture of soda from culinary salt; its importance in the arts and in commerce. glass--soap--sulphuric acid. silver refining. bleaching. trade in sulphur. letter iv connection of theory with practice. employment of magnetism as a moving power--its impracticability. relation of coals and zinc as economic sources of force. manufacture of beet-root sugar--its impolicy. gas for illumination. letter v isomerism, or identity of composition in bodies with different chemical and physical properties. crystallisation. amorphism. isomorphism, or similarity of properties in bodies totally different in composition. letter vi alliance of chemistry with physiology. division of food into nourishment, and materials for combustion. effects of atmospheric oxygen. balance of carbon and oxygen. letter vii animal heat, its laws and influence on the animal functions. loss and supply. influence of climate. fuel of animal heat. agency of oxygen in disease. respiration. letter viii aliments. constituents of the blood. fibrine, albumen. inorganic substances. isomerism of fibrine, albumen, and elements of nutrition. relation of animal and vegetable organisms. letter ix growth of animals. uses of butter and milk. metamorphoses of tissues. food of carnivora, and of the horse. letter x application of the preceding facts to man. division of human food. uses of gelatine. letter xi circulation of matter in the animal and vegetable kingdoms. the ocean. agriculture. restitution of an equilibrium in the soil. causes of the exhaustion of land. virginia. england. relief gained by importation of bones. empirical farming unsatisfactory. necessity for scientific principles. influence of the atmosphere. of saline and earthy matters of the soil. letter xii science and art of agriculture. necessity of chemistry. rationale of agricultural processes. washing for gold. letter xiii illustration of the necessity of chemistry to advance and perfect agriculture. manner in which fallow ameliorates the soil. uses of lime. effects of burning. of marl. letter xiv nature and effects of manures. animal bodies subject to constant waste. parts separating--exuviae--waste vegetable matters--together contain all the elements of the soil and of food. various value of excrements of different animals as manure. letter xv source of the carbon and nitrogen of plants. produce of carbon in forests and meadows supplied only with mineral aliments prove it to be from the atmosphere. relations between mineral constituents, and carbon and nitrogen. effects of the carbonic acid and ammonia of manures. necessity of inorganic constituents to the formation of aliments, of blood, and therefore of nutrition. necessity of inquiries by analysis to advance agriculture. letter xvi results of the author's latest inquiries. superlative importance of the phosphates of lime and alkalies to the cultivation of the cerealia. sources of a supply of these materials. letters on chemistry letter i my dear sir, the influence which the science of chemistry exercises upon human industry, agriculture, and commerce; upon physiology, medicine, and other sciences, is now so interesting a topic of conversation everywhere, that it may be no unacceptable present to you if i trace in a few familiar letters some of the relations it bears to these various sciences, and exhibit for you its actual effect upon the present social condition of mankind. in speaking of the present state of chemistry, its rise and progress, i shall need no apology if, as a preliminary step, i call your attention to the implements which the chemist employs--the means which are indispensable to his labours and to his success. these consist, generally, of materials furnished to us by nature, endowed with many most remarkable properties fitting them for our purposes; if one of them is a production of art, yet its adaptation to the use of mankind,--the qualities which render it available to us,--must be referred to the same source as those derived immediately from nature. cork, platinum, glass, and caoutchouc, are the substances to which i allude, and which minister so essentially to modern chemical investigations. without them, indeed, we might have made some progress, but it would have been slow; we might have accomplished much, but it would have been far less than has been done with their aid. some persons, by the employment of expensive substances, might have successfully pursued the science; but incalculably fewer minds would have been engaged in its advancement. these materials have only been duly appreciated and fully adopted within a very recent period. in the time of lavoisier, the rich alone could make chemical researches; the necessary apparatus could only be procured at a very great expense. and first, of glass: every one is familiar with most of the properties of this curious substance; its transparency, hardness, destitution of colour, and stability under ordinary circumstances: to these obvious qualities we may add those which especially adapt it to the use of the chemist, namely, that it is unaffected by most acids or other fluids contained within it. at certain temperatures it becomes more ductile and plastic than wax, and may be made to assume in our hands, before the flame of a common lamp, the form of every vessel we need to contain our materials, and of every apparatus required to pursue our experiments. then, how admirable and valuable are the properties of cork! how little do men reflect upon the inestimable worth of so common a substance! how few rightly esteem the importance of it to the progress of science, and the moral advancement of mankind!--there is no production of nature or art equally adapted to the purposes to which the chemist applies it. cork consists of a soft, highly elastic substance, as a basis, having diffused throughout a matter with properties resembling wax, tallow, and resin, yet dissimilar to all of these, and termed suberin. this renders it perfectly impermeable to fluids, and, in a great measure, even to gases. it is thus the fittest material we possess for closing our bottles, and retaining their contents. by its means, and with the aid of caoutchouc, we connect our vessels and tubes of glass, and construct the most complicated apparatus. we form joints and links of connexion, adapt large apertures to small, and thus dispense altogether with the aid of the brassfounder and the mechanist. thus the implements of the chemist are cheaply and easily procured, immediately adapted to any purpose, and readily repaired or altered. again, in investigating the composition of solid bodies,--of minerals,--we are under the necessity of bringing them into a liquid state, either by solution or fusion. now vessels of glass, of porcelain, and of all non-metallic substances, are destroyed by the means we employ for that purpose,--are acted upon by many acids, by alkalies and the alkaline carbonates. crucibles of gold and silver would melt at high temperatures. but we have a combination of all the qualities we can desire in platinum. this metal was only first adapted to these uses about fifty years since. it is cheaper than gold, harder and more durable than silver, infusible at all temperatures of our furnaces, and is left intact by acids and alkaline carbonates. platinum unites all the valuable properties of gold and of porcelain, resisting the action of heat, and of almost all chemical agents. as no mineral analysis could be made perfectly without platinum vessels, had we not possessed this metal, the composition of minerals would have yet remained unknown; without cork and caoutchouc we should have required the costly aid of the mechanician at every step. even without the latter of these adjuncts our instruments would have been far more costly and fragile. possessing all these gifts of nature, we economise incalculably our time--to us more precious than money! such are our instruments. an equal improvement has been accomplished in our laboratory. this is no longer the damp, cold, fireproof vault of the metallurgist, nor the manufactory of the druggist, fitted up with stills and retorts. on the contrary, a light, warm, comfortable room, where beautifully constructed lamps supply the place of furnaces, and the pure and odourless flame of gas, or of spirits of wine, supersedes coal and other fuel, and gives us all the fire we need; where health is not invaded, nor the free exercise of thought impeded: there we pursue our inquiries, and interrogate nature to reveal her secrets. to these simple means must be added "the balance," and then we possess everything which is required for the most extensive researches. the great distinction between the manner of proceeding in chemistry and natural philosophy is, that one weighs, the other measures. the natural philosopher has applied his measures to nature for many centuries, but only for fifty years have we attempted to advance our philosophy by weighing. for all great discoveries chemists are indebted to the "balance"--that incomparable instrument which gives permanence to every observation, dispels all ambiguity, establishes truth, detects error, and guides us in the true path of inductive science. the balance, once adopted as a means of investigating nature, put an end to the school of aristotle in physics. the explanation of natural phenomena by mere fanciful speculations, gave place to a true natural philosophy. fire, air, earth, and water, could no longer be regarded as elements. three of them could henceforth be considered only as significative of the forms in which all matter exists. everything with which we are conversant upon the surface of the earth is solid, liquid, or aeriform; but the notion of the elementary nature of air, earth, and water, so universally held, was now discovered to belong to the errors of the past. fire was found to be but the visible and otherwise perceptible indication of changes proceeding within the, so called, elements. lavoisier investigated the composition of the atmosphere and of water, and studied the many wonderful offices performed by an element common to both in the scheme of nature, namely, oxygen: and he discovered many of the properties of this elementary gas. after his time, the principal problem of chemical philosophers was to determine the composition of the solid matters composing the earth. to the eighteen metals previously known were soon added twenty-four discovered to be constituents of minerals. the great mass of the earth was shown to be composed of metals in combination with oxygen, to which they are united in one, two, or more definite and unalterable proportions, forming compounds which are termed metallic oxides, and these, again, combined with oxides of other bodies, essentially different to metals, namely, carbon and silicium. if to these we add certain compounds of sulphur with metals, in which the sulphur takes the place of oxygen, and forms sulphurets, and one other body,--common salt,--(which is a compound of sodium and chlorine), we have every substance which exists in a solid form upon our globe in any very considerable mass. other compounds, innumerably various, are found only in small scattered quantities. the chemist, however, did not remain satisfied with the separation of minerals into their component elements, i.e. their analysis; but he sought by synthesis, i.e. by combining the separate elements and forming substances similar to those constructed by nature, to prove the accuracy of his processes and the correctness of his conclusions. thus he formed, for instance, pumice-stone, feldspar, mica, iron pyrites, &c. artificially. but of all the achievements of inorganic chemistry, the artificial formation of lapis lazuli was the most brilliant and the most conclusive. this mineral, as presented to us by nature, is calculated powerfully to arrest our attention by its beautiful azure-blue colour, its remaining unchanged by exposure to air or to fire, and furnishing us with a most valuable pigment, ultramarine, more precious than gold! the analysis of lapis lazuli represented it to be composed of silica, alumina, and soda, three colourless bodies, with sulphur and a trace of iron. nothing could be discovered in it of the nature of a pigment, nothing to which its blue colour could be referred, the cause of which was searched for in vain. it might therefore have been supposed that the analyst was here altogether at fault, and that at any rate its artificial production must be impossible. nevertheless, this has been accomplished, and simply by combining in the proper proportions, as determined by analysis, silica, alumina, soda, iron, and sulphur. thousands of pounds weight are now manufactured from these ingredients, and this artificial ultramarine is as beautiful as the natural, while for the price of a single ounce of the latter we may obtain many pounds of the former. with the production of artificial lapis lazuli, the formation of mineral bodies by synthesis ceased to be a scientific problem to the chemist; he has no longer sufficient interest in it to pursue the subject. he may now be satisfied that analysis will reveal to him the true constitution of minerals. but to the mineralogist and geologist it is still in a great measure an unexplored field, offering inquiries of the highest interest and importance to their pursuits. after becoming acquainted with the constituent elements of all the substances within our reach and the mutual relations of these elements, the remarkable transmutations to which the bodies are subject under the influence of the vital powers of plants and animals, became the principal object of chemical investigations, and the highest point of interest. a new science, inexhaustible as life itself, is here presented us, standing upon the sound and solid foundation of a well established inorganic chemistry. thus the progress of science is, like the development of nature's works, gradual and expansive. after the buds and branches spring forth the leaves and blossoms, after the blossoms the fruit. chemistry, in its application to animals and vegetables, endeavours jointly with physiology to enlighten us respecting the mysterious processes and sources of organic life. letter ii my dear sir, in my former letter i reminded you that three of the supposed elements of the ancients represent the forms or state in which all the ponderable matter of our globe exists; i would now observe, that no substance possesses absolutely any one of those conditions; that modern chemistry recognises nothing unchangeably solid, liquid, or aeriform: means have been devised for effecting a change of state in almost every known substance. platinum, alumina, and rock crystal, it is true, cannot be liquified by the most intense heat of our furnaces, but they melt like wax before the flame of the oxy-hydrogen blowpipe. on the other hand, of the twenty-eight gaseous bodies with which we are acquainted, twenty-five may be reduced to a liquid state, and one into a solid. probably, ere long, similar changes of condition will be extended to every form of matter. there are many things relating to this condensation of the gases worthy of your attention. most aeriform bodies, when subjected to compression, are made to occupy a space which diminishes in the exact ratio of the increase of the compressing force. very generally, under a force double or triple of the ordinary atmospheric pressure, they become one half or one third their former volume. this was a long time considered to be a law, and known as the law of marriotte; but a more accurate study of the subject has demonstrated that this law is by no means of general application. the volume of certain gases does not decrease in the ratio of the increase of the force used to compress them, but in some, a diminution of their bulk takes place in a far greater degree as the pressure increases. again, if ammoniacal gas is reduced by a compressing force to one-sixth of its volume, or carbonic acid is reduced to one thirty-sixth, a portion of them loses entirely the form of a gas, and becomes a liquid, which, when the pressure is withdrawn, assumes again in an instant its gaseous state--another deviation from the law of marriotte. our process for reducing gases into fluids is of admirable simplicity. a simple bent tube, or a reduction of temperature by artificial means, have superseded the powerful compressing machines of the early experimenters. the cyanuret of mercury, when heated in an open glass tube, is resolved into cyanogen gas and metallic mercury; if this substance is heated in a tube hermetically sealed, the decomposition occurs as before, but the gas, unable to escape, and shut up in a space several hundred times smaller than it would occupy as gas under the ordinary atmospheric pressure, becomes a fluid in that part of the tube which is kept cool. when sulphuric acid is poured upon limestone in an open vessel, carbonic acid escapes with effervescence as a gas, but if the decomposition is effected in a strong, close, and suitable vessel of iron, we obtain the carbonic acid in the state of liquid. in this manner it may be obtained in considerable quantities, even many pounds weight. carbonic acid is separated from other bodies with which it is combined as a fluid under a pressure of thirty-six atmospheres. the curious properties of fluid carbonic acid are now generally known. when a small quantity is permitted to escape into the atmosphere, it assumes its gaseous state with extraordinary rapidity, and deprives the remaining fluid of caloric so rapidly that it congeals into a white crystalline mass like snow: at first, indeed, it was thought to be really snow, but upon examination it proved to be pure frozen carbonic acid. this solid, contrary to expectation, exercises only a feeble pressure upon the surrounding medium. the fluid acid inclosed in a glass tube rushes at once, when opened, into a gaseous state, with an explosion which shatters the tube into fragments; but solid carbonic acid can be handled without producing any other effect than a feeling of intense cold. the particles of the carbonic acid being so closely approximated in the solid, the whole force of cohesive attraction (which in the fluid is weak) becomes exerted, and opposes its tendency to assume its gaseous state; but as it receives heat from surrounding bodies, it passes into gas gradually and without violence. the transition of solid carbonic acid into gas deprives all around it of caloric so rapidly and to so great an extent, that a degree of cold is produced immeasurably great, the greatest indeed known. ten, twenty, or more pounds weight of mercury, brought into contact with a mixture of ether and solid carbonic acid, becomes in a few moments firm and malleable. this, however, cannot be accomplished without considerable danger. a melancholy accident occurred at paris, which will probably prevent for the future the formation of solid carbonic acid in these large quantities, and deprive the next generation of the gratification of witnessing these curious experiments. just before the commencement of the lecture in the laboratory of the polytechnic school, an iron cylinder, two feet and a half long and one foot in diameter, in which carbonic acid had been developed for experiment before the class, burst, and its fragments were scattered about with the most tremendous force; it cut off both the legs of the assistant and killed him on the spot. this vessel, formed of the strongest cast-iron, and shaped like a cannon, had often been employed to exhibit experiments in the presence of the students. we can scarcely think, without shuddering, of the dreadful calamity such an explosion would have occasioned in a hall filled with spectators. when we had ascertained the fact of gases becoming fluid under the influence of cold or pressure, a curious property possessed by charcoal, that of absorbing gas to the extent of many times its volume,--ten, twenty, or even as in the case of ammoniacal gas or muriatic acid gas, eighty or ninety fold,--which had been long known, no longer remained a mystery. some gases are absorbed and condensed within the pores of the charcoal, into a space several hundred times smaller than they before occupied; and there is now no doubt they there become fluid, or assume a solid state. as in a thousand other instances, chemical action here supplants mechanical forces. adhesion or heterogeneous attraction, as it is termed, acquired by this discovery a more extended meaning; it had never before been thought of as a cause of change of state in matter; but it is now evident that a gas adheres to the surface of a solid body by the same force which condenses it into a liquid. the smallest amount of a gas,--atmospheric air for instance,--can be compressed into a space a thousand times smaller by mere mechanical pressure, and then its bulk must be to the least measurable surface of a solid body, as a grain of sand to a mountain. by the mere effect of mass,--the force of gravity,--gaseous molecules are attracted by solids and adhere to their surfaces; and when to this physical force is added the feeblest chemical affinity, the liquifiable gases cannot retain their gaseous state. the amount of air condensed by these forces upon a square inch of surface is certainly not measurable; but when a solid body, presenting several hundred square feet of surface within the space of a cubic inch, is brought into a limited volume of gas, we may understand why that volume is diminished, why all gases without exception are absorbed. a cubic inch of charcoal must have, at the lowest computation, a surface of one hundred square feet. this property of absorbing gases varies with different kinds of charcoal: it is possessed in a higher degree by those containing the most pores, i.e. where the pores are finer; and in a lower degree in the more spongy kinds, i.e. where the pores are larger. in this manner every porous body--rocks, stones, the clods of the fields, &c.,--imbibe air, and therefore oxygen; the smallest solid molecule is thus surrounded by its own atmosphere of condensed oxygen; and if in their vicinity other bodies exist which have an affinity for oxygen, a combination is effected. when, for instance, carbon and hydrogen are thus present, they are converted into nourishment for vegetables,--into carbonic acid and water. the development of heat when air is imbibed, and the production of steam when the earth is moistened by rain, are acknowledged to be consequences of this condensation by the action of surfaces. but the most remarkable and interesting case of this kind of action is the imbibition of oxygen by metallic platinum. this metal, when massive, is of a lustrous white colour, but it may be brought, by separating it from its solutions, into so finely divided a state, that its particles no longer reflect light, and it forms a powder as black as soot. in this condition it absorbs eight hundred times its volume of oxygen gas, and this oxygen must be contained within it in a state of condensation very like that of fluid water. when gases are thus condensed, i.e. their particles made to approximate in this extraordinary manner, their properties can be palpably shown. their chemical actions become apparent as their physical characteristic disappears. the latter consists in the continual tendency of their particles to separate from each other; and it is easy to imagine that this elasticity of gaseous bodies is the principal impediment to the operation of their chemical force; for this becomes more energetic as their particles approximate. in that state in which they exist within the pores or upon the surface of solid bodies, their repulsion ceases, and their whole chemical action is exerted. thus combinations which oxygen cannot enter into, decompositions which it cannot effect while in the state of gas, take place with the greatest facility in the pores of platinum containing condensed oxygen. when a jet of hydrogen gas, for instance, is thrown upon spongy platinum, it combines with the oxygen condensed in the interior of the mass; at their point of contact water is formed, and as the immediate consequence heat is evolved; the platinum becomes red hot and the gas is inflamed. if we interrupt the current of the gas, the pores of the platinum become instantaneously filled again with oxygen; and the same phenomenon can be repeated a second time, and so on interminably. in finely pulverised platinum, and even in spongy platinum, we therefore possess a perpetuum mobile--a mechanism like a watch which runs out and winds itself up--a force which is never exhausted--competent to produce effects of the most powerful kind, and self-renewed ad infinitum. many phenomena, formerly inexplicable, are satisfactorily explained by these recently discovered properties of porous bodies. the metamorphosis of alcohol into acetic acid, by the process known as the quick vinegar manufacture, depends upon principles, at a knowledge of which we have arrived by a careful study of these properties. letter iii my dear sir, the manufacture of soda from common culinary salt, may be regarded as the foundation of all our modern improvements in the domestic arts; and we may take it as affording an excellent illustration of the dependence of the various branches of human industry and commerce upon each other, and their relation to chemistry. soda has been used from time immemorial in the manufacture of soap and glass, two chemical productions which employ and keep in circulation an immense amount of capital. the quantity of soap consumed by a nation would be no inaccurate measure whereby to estimate its wealth and civilisation. of two countries, with an equal amount of population, the wealthiest and most highly civilised will consume the greatest weight of soap. this consumption does not subserve sensual gratification, nor depend upon fashion, but upon the feeling of the beauty, comfort, and welfare, attendant upon cleanliness; and a regard to this feeling is coincident with wealth and civilisation. the rich in the middle ages concealed a want of cleanliness in their clothes and persons under a profusion of costly scents and essences, whilst they were more luxurious in eating and drinking, in apparel and horses. with us a want of cleanliness is equivalent to insupportable misery and misfortune. soap belongs to those manufactured products, the money value of which continually disappears from circulation, and requires to be continually renewed. it is one of the few substances which are entirely consumed by use, leaving no product of any worth. broken glass and bottles are by no means absolutely worthless; for rags we may purchase new cloth, but soap-water has no value whatever. it would be interesting to know accurately the amount of capital involved in the manufacture of soap; it is certainly as large as that employed in the coffee trade, with this important difference as respects germany, that it is entirely derived from our own soil. france formerly imported soda from spain,--spanish sodas being of the best quality--at an annual expenditure of twenty to thirty millions of francs. during the war with england the price of soda, and consequently of soap and glass, rose continually; and all manufactures suffered in consequence. the present method of making soda from common salt was discovered by le blanc at the end of the last century. it was a rich boon for france, and became of the highest importance during the wars of napoleon. in a very short time it was manufactured to an extraordinary extent, especially at the seat of the soap manufactories. marseilles possessed for a time a monopoly of soda and soap. the policy of napoleon deprived that city of the advantages derived from this great source of commerce, and thus excited the hostility of the population to his dynasty, which became favourable to the restoration of the bourbons. a curious result of an improvement in a chemical manufacture! it was not long, however, in reaching england. in order to prepare the soda of commerce (which is the carbonate) from common salt, it is first converted into glauber's salt (sulphate of soda). for this purpose pounds weight of concentrated sulphuric acid (oil of vitriol) are required to pounds of common salt. the duty upon salt checked, for a short time, the full advantage of this discovery; but when the government repealed the duty, and its price was reduced to its minimum, the cost of soda depended upon that of sulphuric acid. the demand for sulphuric acid now increased to an immense extent; and, to supply it, capital was embarked abundantly, as it afforded an excellent remuneration. the origin and formation of sulphuric acid was studied most carefully; and from year to year, better, simpler, and cheaper methods of making it were discovered. with every improvement in the mode of manufacture, its price fell; and its sale increased in an equal ratio. sulphuric acid is now manufactured in leaden chambers, of such magnitude that they would contain the whole of an ordinary-sized house. as regards the process and the apparatus, this manufacture has reached its acme--scarcely is either susceptible of improvement. the leaden plates of which the chambers are constructed, requiring to be joined together with lead (since tin or solder would be acted on by the acid), this process was, until lately, as expensive as the plates themselves; but now, by means of the oxy-hydrogen blowpipe, the plates are cemented together at their edges by mere fusion, without the intervention of any kind of solder. and then, as to the process: according to theory, pounds weight of sulphur ought to produce pounds of sulphuric acid; in practice pounds are actually obtained; the amount of loss is therefore too insignificant for consideration. again; saltpetre being indispensable in making sulphuric acid, the commercial value of that salt had formerly an important influence upon its price. it is true that pounds of saltpetre only are required to pounds of sulphur; but its cost was four times greater than an equal weight of the latter. travellers had observed near the small seaport of yquiqui, in the district of atacama, in peru, an efflorescence covering the ground over extensive districts. this was found to consist principally of nitrate of soda. advantage was quickly taken of this discovery. the quantity of this valuable salt proved to be inexhaustible, as it exists in beds extending over more than square miles. it was brought to england at less than half the freight of the east india saltpetre (nitrate of potassa); and as, in the chemical manufacture neither the potash nor the soda were required, but only the nitric acid, in combination with the alkali, the soda-saltpetre of south america soon supplanted the potash-nitre of the east. the manufacture of sulphuric acid received a new impulse; its price was much diminished without injury to the manufacturer; and, with the exception of fluctuations caused by the impediments thrown in the way of the export of sulphur from sicily, it soon became reduced to a minimum, and remained stationary. potash-saltpetre is now only employed in the manufacture of gunpowder; it is no longer in demand for other purposes; and thus, if government effect a saving of many hundred thousand pounds annually in gunpowder, this economy must be attributed to the increased manufacture of sulphuric acid. we may form an idea of the amount of sulphuric acid consumed, when we find that , pounds weight are made by a small manufactory, and from , to , pounds by a large one annually. this manufacture causes immense sums to flow annually into sicily. it has introduced industry and wealth into the arid and desolate districts of atacama. it has enabled us to obtain platina from its ores at a moderate and yet remunerating price; since the vats employed for concentrating this acid are constructed of this metal, and cost from l. to l. sterling. it leads to frequent improvements in the manufacture of glass, which continually becomes cheaper and more beautiful. it enables us to return to our fields all their potash--a most valuable and important manure--in the form of ashes, by substituting soda in the manufacture of glass and soap. it is impossible to trace, within the compass of a letter, all the ramifications of this tissue of changes and improvements resulting from one chemical manufacture; but i must still claim your attention to a few more of its most important and immediate results. i have already told you, that in the manufacture of soda from culinary salt, it is first converted into sulphate of soda. in this first part of the process, the action of sulphuric acid produces muriatic acid to the extent of one-and-a-half the amount of the sulphuric acid employed. at first, the profit upon the soda was so great, that no one took the trouble to collect the muriatic acid: indeed it had no commercial value. a profitable application of it was, however, soon discovered: it is a compound of chlorine, and this substance may be obtained from it purer than from any other source. the bleaching power of chlorine has long been known; but it was only employed upon a large scale after it was obtained from this residuary muriatic acid, and it was found that in combination with lime it could be transported to distances without inconvenience. thenceforth it was used for bleaching cotton; and, but for this new bleaching process, it would scarcely have been possible for the cotton manufacture of great britain to have attained its present enormous extent,--it could not have competed in price with france and germany. in the old process of bleaching, every piece must be exposed to the air and light during several weeks in the summer, and kept continually moist by manual labour. for this purpose, meadow land, eligibly situated, was essential. now a single establishment near glasgow bleaches pieces of cotton daily, throughout the year. what an enormous capital would be required to purchase land for this purpose! how greatly would it increase the cost of bleaching to pay interest upon this capital, or to hire so much land in england! this expense would scarcely have been felt in germany. besides the diminished expense, the cotton stuffs bleached with chlorine suffer less in the hands of skilful workmen than those bleached in the sun; and already the peasantry in some parts of germany have adopted it, and find it advantageous. another use to which cheap muriatic acid is applied, is the manufacture of glue from bones. bone contains from to per cent. of earthy matter--chiefly phosphate of lime, and the remainder is gelatine. when bones are digested in muriatic acid they become transparent and flexible like leather, the earthy matter is dissolved, and after the acid is all carefully washed away, pieces of glue of the same shape as the bones remain, which are soluble in hot water and adapted to all the purposes of ordinary glue, without further preparation. another important application of sulphuric acid may be adduced; namely, to the refining of silver and the separation of gold, which is always present in some proportion in native silver. silver, as it is usually obtained from mines in europe, contains in ounces, to ounces of copper. when used by the silversmith, or in coining, ounces must contain in germany ounces of silver, in england about / . but this alloy is always made artificially by mixing pure silver with the due proportion of the copper; and for this purpose the silver must be obtained pure by the refiner. this he formerly effected by amalgamation, or by roasting it with lead; and the cost of this process was about l. for every hundred-weight of silver. in the silver so prepared, about / to / th part of gold remained; to effect the separation of this by nitrio-hydrochloric acid was more expensive than the value of the gold; it was therefore left in utensils, or circulated in coin, valueless. the copper, too, of the native silver was no use whatever. but the / th part of gold, being about one and a half per cent. of the value of the silver, now covers the cost of refining, and affords an adequate profit to the refiner; so that he effects the separation of the copper, and returns to his employer the whole amount of the pure silver, as well as the copper, without demanding any payment: he is amply remunerated by that minute portion of gold. the new process of refining is a most beautiful chemical operation: the granulated metal is boiled in concentrated sulphuric acid, which dissolves both the silver and the copper, leaving the gold nearly pure, in the form of a black powder. the solution is then placed in a leaden vessel containing metallic copper; this is gradually dissolved, and the silver precipitated in a pure metallic state. the sulphate of copper thus formed is also a valuable product, being employed in the manufacture of green and blue pigments. other immediate results of the economical production of sulphuric acid, are the general employment of phosphorus matches, and of stearine candles, that beautiful substitute for tallow and wax. twenty-five years ago, the present prices and extensive applications of sulphuric and muriatic acids, of soda, phosphorus, &c., would have been considered utterly impossible. who is able to foresee what new and unthought-of chemical productions, ministering to the service and comforts of mankind, the next twenty-five years may produce? after these remarks you will perceive that it is no exaggeration to say, we may fairly judge of the commercial prosperity of a country from the amount of sulphuric acid it consumes. reflecting upon the important influence which the price of sulphur exercises upon the cost of production of bleached and printed cotton stuffs, soap, glass, &c., and remembering that great britain supplies america, spain, portugal, and the east, with these, exchanging them for raw cotton, silk, wine, raisins, indigo, &c., &c., we can understand why the english government should have resolved to resort to war with naples, in order to abolish the sulphur monopoly, which the latter power attempted recently to establish. nothing could be more opposed to the true interests of sicily than such a monopoly; indeed, had it been maintained a few years, it is highly probable that sulphur, the source of her wealth, would have been rendered perfectly valueless to her. science and industry form a power to which it is dangerous to present impediments. it was not difficult to perceive that the issue would be the entire cessation of the exportation of sulphur from sicily. in the short period the sulphur monopoly lasted, fifteen patents were taken out for methods to obtain back the sulphuric acid used in making soda. admitting that these fifteen experiments were not perfectly successful, there can be no doubt it would ere long have been accomplished. but then, in gypsum, (sulphate of lime), and in heavy-spar, (sulphate of barytes), we possess mountains of sulphuric acid; in galena, (sulphate of lead), and in iron pyrites, we have no less abundance of sulphur. the problem is, how to separate the sulphuric acid, or the sulphur, from these native stores. hundreds of thousands of pounds weight of sulphuric acid were prepared from iron pyrites, while the high price of sulphur consequent upon the monopoly lasted. we should probably ere long have triumphed over all difficulties, and have separated it from gypsum. the impulse has been given, the possibility of the process proved, and it may happen in a few years that the inconsiderate financial speculation of naples may deprive her of that lucrative commerce. in like manner russia, by her prohibitory system, has lost much of her trade in tallow and potash. one country purchases only from absolute necessity from another, which excludes her own productions from her markets. instead of the tallow and linseed oil of russia, great britain now uses palm oil and cocoa-nut oil of other countries. precisely analogous is the combination of workmen against their employers, which has led to the construction of many admirable machines for superseding manual labour. in commerce and industry every imprudence carries with it its own punishment; every oppression immediately and sensibly recoils upon the head of those from whom it emanates. letter iv my dear sir, one of the most influential causes of improvement in the social condition of mankind is that spirit of enterprise which induces men of capital to adopt and carry out suggestions for the improvement of machinery, the creation of new articles of commerce, or the cheaper production of those already in demand; and we cannot but admire the energy with which such men devote their talents, their time, and their wealth, to realise the benefits of the discoveries and inventions of science. for even when these are expended upon objects wholly incapable of realisation,--nay, even when the idea which first gave the impulse proves in the end to be altogether impracticable or absurd, immediate good to the community generally ensues; some useful and perhaps unlooked-for result flows directly, or springs ultimately, from exertions frustrated in their main design. thus it is also in the pursuit of science. theories lead to experiments and investigations; and he who investigates will scarcely ever fail of being rewarded by discoveries. it may be, indeed, the theory sought to be established is entirely unfounded in nature; but while searching in a right spirit for one thing, the inquirer may be rewarded by finding others far more valuable than those which he sought. at the present moment, electro-magnetism, as a moving power, is engaging great attention and study; wonders are expected from its application to this purpose. according to the sanguine expectations of many persons, it will shortly be employed to put into motion every kind of machinery, and amongst other things it will be applied to impel the carriages of railroads, and this at so small a cost, that expense will no longer be matter of consideration. england is to lose her superiority as a manufacturing country, inasmuch as her vast store of coals will no longer avail her as an economical source of motive power. "we," say the german cultivators of this science, "have cheap zinc, and, how small a quantity of this metal is required to turn a lathe, and consequently to give motion to any kind of machinery!" such expectations may be very attractive, and yet they are altogether illusory! they will not bear the test of a few simple calculations; and these our friends have not troubled themselves to institute. with a simple flame of spirits of wine, under a proper vessel containing boiling water, a small carriage of to pounds weight can be put into motion, or a weight of to pounds may be raised to a height of feet. the same effects may be produced by dissolving zinc in dilute sulphuric acid in a certain apparatus. this is certainly an astonishing and highly interesting discovery; but the question to be determined is, which of the two processes is the least expensive? in order to answer this question, and to judge correctly of the hopes entertained from this discovery, let me remind you of what chemists denominate "equivalents." these are certain unalterable ratios of effects which are proportionate to each other, and may therefore be expressed in numbers. thus, if we require pounds of oxygen to produce a certain effect, and we wish to employ chlorine for the same effect, we must employ neither more nor less than / pounds weight. in the same manner, pounds weight of coal are equivalent to pounds weight of zinc. the numbers representing chemical equivalents express very general ratios of effects, comprehending for all bodies all the actions they are capable of producing. if zinc be combined in a certain manner with another metal, and submitted to the action of dilute sulphuric acid, it is dissolved in the form of an oxide; it is in fact burned at the expense of the oxygen contained in the fluid. a consequence of this action is the production of an electric current, which, if conducted through a wire, renders it magnetic. in thus effecting the solution of a pound weight, for example, of zinc, we obtain a definite amount of force adequate to raise a given weight one inch, and to keep it suspended; and the amount of weight it will be capable of suspending will be the greater the more rapidly the zinc is dissolved. by alternately interrupting and renewing the contact of the zinc with the acid, and by very simple mechanical arrangements, we can give to the iron an upward and downward or a horizontal motion, thus producing the conditions essential to the motion of any machinery. this moving force is produced by the oxidation of the zinc; and, setting aside the name given to the force in this case, we know that it can be produced in another manner. if we burn the zinc under the boiler of a steam-engine, consequently in the oxygen of the air instead of the galvanic pile, we should produce steam, and by it a certain amount of force. if we should assume, (which, however, is not proved,) that the quantity of force is unequal in these cases,--that, for instance, we had obtained double or triple the amount in the galvanic pile, or that in this mode of generating force less loss is sustained,--we must still recollect the equivalents of zinc and coal, and make these elements of our calculation. according to the experiments of despretz, pounds weight of zinc, in combining with oxygen, develops no more heat than pound of coal; consequently, under equal conditions, we can produce six times the amount of force with a pound of coal as with a pound of zinc. it is therefore obvious that it would be more advantageous to employ coal instead of zinc, even if the latter produced four times as much force in a galvanic pile, as an equal weight of coal by its combustion under a boiler. indeed it is highly probable, that if we burn under the boiler of a steam-engine the quantity of coal required for smelting the zinc from its ores, we shall produce far more force than the whole of the zinc so obtained could originate in any form of apparatus whatever. heat, electricity, and magnetism, have a similar relation to each other as the chemical equivalents of coal, zinc, and oxygen. by a certain measure of electricity we produce a corresponding proportion of heat or of magnetic power; we obtain that electricity by chemical affinity, which in one shape produces heat, in another electricity or magnetism. a certain amount of affinity produces an equivalent of electricity in the same manner as, on the other hand, we decompose equivalents of chemical compounds by a definite measure of electricity. the magnetic force of the pile is therefore limited to the extent of the chemical affinity, and in the case before us is obtained by the combination of the zinc and sulphuric acid. in the combustion of coal, the heat results from, and is measured by, the affinity of the oxygen of the atmosphere for that substance. it is true that with a very small expense of zinc, we can make an iron wire a magnet capable of sustaining a thousand pounds weight of iron; let us not allow ourselves to be misled by this. such a magnet could not raise a single pound weight of iron two inches, and therefore could not impart motion. the magnet acts like a rock, which while at rest presses with a weight of a thousand pounds upon a basis; it is like an inclosed lake, without an outlet and without a fall. but it may be said, we have, by mechanical arrangements, given it an outlet and a fall. true; and this must be regarded as a great triumph of mechanics; and i believe it is susceptible of further improvements, by which greater force may be obtained. but with every conceivable advantage of mechanism, no one will dispute that one pound of coal, under the boiler of a steam-engine, will give motion to a mass several hundred times greater than a pound of zinc in the galvanic pile. our experience of the employment of electro-magnetism as a motory power is, however, too recent to enable us to foresee the ultimate results of contrivances to apply it; and, therefore, those who have devoted themselves to solve the problem of its application should not be discouraged, inasmuch as it would undoubtedly be a most important achievement to supersede the steam-engine, and thus escape the danger of railroads, even at double their expense. professor weber of gottingen has thrown out a suggestion, that if a contrivance could be devised to enable us to convert at will the wheels of the steam-carriage into magnets, we should be enabled to ascend and descend acclivities with great facility. this notion may ultimately be, to a certain extent, realised. the employment of the galvanic pile as a motory power, however, must, like every other contrivance, depend upon the question of its relative economy: probably some time hence it may so far succeed as to be adopted in certain favourable localities; it may stand in the same relation to steam power as the manufacture of beet sugar bears to that of cane, or as the production of gas from oils and resins to that from mineral coal. the history of beet-root sugar affords us an excellent illustration of the effect of prices upon commercial productions. this branch of industry seems at length, as to its processes, to be perfected. the most beautiful white sugar is now manufactured from the beet-root, in the place of the treacle-like sugar, having the taste of the root, which was first obtained; and instead of or per cent., the proportion obtained by achard, double or even treble that amount is now produced. and notwithstanding the perfection of the manufacture, it is probable it will ere long be in most places entirely discontinued. in the years to , the prices of agricultural produce were much lower than at present, while the price of sugar was the same. at that time one malter [ ] of wheat was s., and one klafter [ ] of wood s., and land was falling in price. thus, food and fuel were cheap, and the demand for sugar unlimited; it was, therefore, advantageous to grow beet-root, and to dispose of the produce of land as sugar. all these circumstances are now different. a malter of wheat costs s.; a klafter of wood, s. to s. wages have risen, but not in proportion, whilst the price of colonial sugar has fallen. within the limits of the german commercial league, as, for instance, at frankfort-on-the-maine, a pound of the whitest and best loaf sugar is d.; the import duty is /d., or s. per cwt., leaving /d. as the price of the sugar. in the year , then, one malter of wheat was equal to lbs. weight of sugar, whilst at present that quantity of wheat is worth lbs. of sugar. if indeed fuel were the same in price as formerly, and lbs. of sugar could be obtained from the same quantity of the root as then yielded lbs., it might still be advantageously produced; but the amount, if now obtained by the most approved methods of extraction, falls far short of this; and as fuel is double the price, and labour dearer, it follows that, at present, it is far more advantageous to cultivate wheat and to purchase sugar. there are, however, other elements which must enter into our calculations; but these serve to confirm our conclusion that the manufacture of beet-root sugar as a commercial speculation must cease. the leaves and residue of the root, after the juice was expressed, were used as food for cattle, and their value naturally increased with the price of grain. by the process formerly pursued, lbs. weight of juice were obtained from lbs. of beet-root, and gave lbs. of sugar. the method of schutzenbach, which was eagerly adopted by the manufacturers, produced from the same quantity of root lbs. of sugar; but it was attended with more expense to produce, and the loss of the residue as food for cattle. the increased expense in this process arises from the larger quantity of fuel required to evaporate the water; for instead of merely evaporating the juice, the dry residue is treated with water, and we require fuel sufficient to evaporate lbs. of fluid instead of lbs., and the residue is only fit for manure. the additional lbs. of sugar are purchased at the expense of much fuel, and the loss of the residue as an article of food. if the valley of the rhine possessed mines of diamonds as rich as those of golconda, visiapoor, or the brazils, they would probably not be worth the working: at those places the cost of extraction is s. to s. the carat. with us it amounts to three or four times as much--to more, in fact, than diamonds are worth in the market. the sand of the rhine contains gold; and in the grand duchy of baden many persons are occupied in gold-washing when wages are low; but as soon as they rise, this employment ceases. the manufacture of sugar from beet-root, in the like manner, twelve to fourteen years ago offered advantages which are now lost: instead, therefore, of maintaining it at a great sacrifice, it would be more reasonable, more in accordance with true natural economy, to cultivate other and more valuable productions, and with them purchase sugar. not only would the state be the gainer, but every member of the community. this argument does not apply, perhaps, to france and bohemia, where the prices of fuel and of colonial sugar are very different to those in germany. the manufacture of gas for lighting, from coal, resin, and oils, stands with us on the same barren ground. the price of the materials from which gas is manufactured in england bears a direct proportion to the price of corn: there the cost of tallow and oil is twice as great as in germany, but iron and coal are two-thirds cheaper; and even in england the manufacture of gas is only advantageous when the other products of the distillation of coal, the coke, &c., can be sold. it would certainly be esteemed one of the greatest discoveries of the age if any one could succeed in condensing coal gas into a white, dry, solid, odourless substance, portable, and capable of being placed upon a candlestick, or burned in a lamp. wax, tallow, and oil, are combustible gases in a solid or fluid form, which offer many advantages for lighting, not possessed by gas: they furnish, in well-constructed lamps, as much light, without requiring the expensive apparatus necessary for the combustion of gas, and they are generally more economical. in large towns, or such establishments as hotels, where coke is in demand, and where losses in stolen tallow or oil must be considered, together with the labour of snuffing candles and cleaning lamps, the higher price of gas is compensated. in places where gas can be manufactured from resin, oil of turpentine, and other cheap oils, as at frankfort, this is advantageous so long as it is pursued on small scale only. if large towns were lighted in the same manner, the materials would rise in price: the whole amount at present produced would scarcely suffice for two such towns as berlin and munich. but no just calculation can be made from the present prices of turpentine, resin, &c., which are not produced upon any large scale. [footnote : malter--a measure containing several bushels, but varying in different countries.] [footnote : klafter--a cord, a stack, measuring six feet every way.] letter v my dear sir, until very recently it was supposed that the physical qualities of bodies, i.e. hardness, colour, density, transparency, &c., and still more their chemical properties, must depend upon the nature of their elements, or upon their composition. it was tacitly received as a principle, that two bodies containing the same elements in the same proportion, must of necessity possess the same properties. we could not imagine an exact identity of composition giving rise to two bodies entirely different in their sensible appearance and chemical relations. the most ingenious philosophers entertained the opinion that chemical combination is an inter-penetration of the particles of different kinds of matter, and that all matter is susceptible of infinite division. this has proved to be altogether a mistake. if matter were infinitely divisible in this sense, its particles must be imponderable, and a million of such molecules could not weigh more than an infinitely small one. but the particles of that imponderable matter, which, striking upon the retina, give us the sensation of light, are not in a mathematical sense infinitely small. inter-penetration of elements in the production of a chemical compound, supposes two distinct bodies, a and b, to occupy one and the same space at the same time. if this were so, different properties could not consist with an equal and identical composition. that hypothesis, however, has shared the fate of innumerable imaginative explanations of natural phenomena, in which our predecessors indulged. they have now no advocate. the force of truth, dependent upon observation, is irresistible. a great many substances have been discovered amongst organic bodies, composed of the same elements in the same relative proportions, and yet exhibiting physical and chemical properties perfectly distinct one from another. to such substances the term isomeric (from /ao / equal and aei /o / part) is applied. a great class of bodies, known as the volatile oils, oil of turpentine, essence of lemons, oil of balsam of copaiba, oil of rosemary, oil of juniper, and many others, differing widely from each other in their odour, in their medicinal effects, in their boiling point, in their specific gravity, &c., are exactly identical in composition,--they contain the same elements, carbon and hydrogen, in the same proportions. how admirably simple does the chemistry of organic nature present itself to us from this point of view! an extraordinary variety of compound bodies produced with equal weights of two elements! and how wide their dissimilarity! the crystallised part of the oil of roses, the delicious fragrance of which is so well known, a solid at ordinary temperatures, although readily volatile, is a compound body containing exactly the same elements, and in the same proportions, as the gas we employ for lighting our streets; and, in short, the same elements, in the same relative quantities, are found in a dozen other compounds, all differing essentially in their physical and chemical properties. these remarkable truths, so highly important in their applications, were not received and admitted as sufficiently established, without abundant proofs. many examples have long been known where the analysis of two different bodies gave the same composition; but such cases were regarded as doubtful: at any rate, they were isolated observations, homeless in the realms of science: until, at length, examples were discovered of two or more bodies whose absolute identity of composition, with totally distinct properties, could be demonstrated in a more obvious and conclusive manner than by mere analysis; that is, they can be converted and reconverted into each other without addition and without subtraction. in cyanuric acid, hydrated cyanic acid, and cyamelide, we have three such isomeric compounds. cyanuric acid is crystalline, soluble in water, and capable of forming salts with metallic oxides. hydrated cyanic acid is a volatile and highly blistering fluid, which cannot be brought into contact with water without being instantaneously decomposed. cyamelide is a white substance very like porcelain, absolutely insoluble in water. now if we place the first,--cyanuric acid,--in a vessel hermetically sealed, and apply a high degree of heat, it is converted by its influence into hydrated cyanic acid; and, then, if this is kept for some time at the common temperature, it passes into cyamelide, no other element being present. and, again inversely, cyamelide can be converted into cyanuric acid and hydrated cyanic acid. we have three other bodies which pass through similar changes, in aldehyde, metaldehyde, and etaldehyde; and, again two, in urea and cyanuret of ammonia. further, parts of aldehyde hydrated butyric acid and acetic ether contain the same elements in the same proportion. thus one substance may be converted into another without addition or subtraction, and without the participation of any foreign bodies in the change. the doctrine that matter is not infinitely divisible, but on the contrary, consists of atoms incapable of further division, alone furnishes us with a satisfactory explanation of these phenomena. in chemical combinations, the ultimate atoms of bodies do not penetrate each other, they are only arranged side by side in a certain order, and the properties of the compound depend entirely upon this order. if they are made to change their place--their mode of arrangement--by an impulse from without, they combine again in a different manner, and another compound is formed with totally different properties. we may suppose that one atom combines with one atom of another element to form a compound atom, while in other bodies two and two, four and four, eight and eight, are united; so that in all such compounds the amount per cent. of the elements is absolutely equal; and yet their physical and chemical properties must be totally different, the constitution of each atom being peculiar, in one body consisting of two, in another of four, in a third of eight, and in a fourth of sixteen simple atoms. the discovery of these facts immediately led to many most beautiful and interesting results; they furnished us with a satisfactory explanation of observations which were before veiled in mystery,--a key to many of nature's most curious recesses. again; solid bodies, whether simple or compound, are capable of existing in two states, which are known by the terms amorphous and crystalline. when matter is passing from a gaseous or liquid state slowly into a solid, an incessant motion is observed, as if the molecules were minute magnets; they are seen to repel each other in one direction, and to attract and cohere together in another, and in the end become arranged into a regular form, which under equal circumstances is always the same for any given kind of matter; that is, crystals are formed. time and freedom of motion for the particles of bodies are necessary to the formation of crystals. if we force a fluid or a gas to become suddenly solid, leaving no time for its particles to arrange themselves, and cohere in that direction in which the cohesive attraction is strongest, no crystals will be formed, but the resulting solid will have a different colour, a different degree of hardness and cohesion, and will refract light differently; in one word, will be amorphous. thus we have cinnabar as a red and a jet-black substance; sulphur a fixed and brittle body, and soft, semitransparent, and ductile; glass as a milk-white opaque substance, so hard that it strikes fire with steel, and in its ordinary and well-known state. these dissimilar states and properties of the same body are occasioned in one case by a regular, in the other by an irregular, arrangement of its atoms; one is crystalline, the other amorphous. applying these facts to natural productions, we have reason to believe that clay-slate, and many kinds of greywacke, are amorphous feldspar, as transition limestone is amorphous marble, basalt and lava mixtures of amorphous zeolite and augite. anything that influences the cohesion, must also in a certain degree alter the properties of bodies. carbonate of lime, if crystallised at ordinary temperatures, possesses the crystalline form, hardness, and refracting power of common spar; if crystallised at a higher temperature, it has the form and properties of arragonite. finally, isomorphism, or the equality of form of many chemical compounds having a different composition, tends to prove that matter consists of atoms the mere arrangement of which produces all the properties of bodies. but when we find that a different arrangement of the same elements gives rise to various physical and chemical properties, and a similar arrangement of different elements produces properties very much the same, may we not inquire whether some of those bodies which we regard as elements may not be merely modifications of the same substance?--whether they are not the same matter in a different state of arrangement? we know in fact the existence of iron in two states, so dissimilar, that in the one, it is to the electric chain like platinum, and in the other it is like zinc; so that powerful galvanic machines have been constructed of this one metal. among the elements are several instances of remarkable similarity of properties. thus there is a strong resemblance between platinum and iridium; bromine and iodine; iron, manganese, and magnesium; cobalt and nickel; phosphorus and arsenic; but this resemblance consists mainly in their forming isomorphous compounds in which these elements exist in the same relative proportion. these compounds are similar, because the atoms of which they are composed are arranged in the same manner. the converse of this is also true: nitrate of strontia becomes quite dissimilar to its common state if a certain proportion of water is taken into its composition. if we suppose selenium to be merely modified sulphur, and phosphorus modified arsenic, how does it happen, we must inquire, that sulphuric acid and selenic acid, phosphoric and arsenic acid, respectively form compounds which it is impossible to distinguish by their form and solubility? were these merely isomeric, they ought to exhibit properties quite dissimilar! we have not, i believe, at present the remotest ground to suppose that any one of those substances which chemists regard as elements can be converted into another. such a conversion, indeed, would presuppose that the element was composed of two or more ingredients, and was in fact not an element; and until the decomposition of these bodies is accomplished, and their constituents discovered, all pretensions to such conversions deserve no notice. dr. brown of edinburgh thought he had converted iron into rhodium, and carbon or paracyanogen into silicon. his paper upon this subject was published in the transactions of the royal society of edinburgh, and contained internal evidence, without a repetition of his experiments, that he was totally unacquainted with the principles of chemical analysis. but his experiments have been carefully repeated by qualified persons, and they have completely proved his ignorance: his rhodium is iron, and his silicon an impure incombustible coal. letter vi my dear sir, one of the most remarkable effects of the recent progress of science is the alliance of chemistry with physiology, by which a new and unexpected light has been thrown upon the vital processes of plants and animals. we have now no longer any difficulty in understanding the different actions of aliments, poisons, and remedial agents--we have a clear conception of the causes of hunger, of the exact nature of death; and we are not, as formerly, obliged to content ourselves with a mere description of their symptoms. it is now ascertained with positive certainty, that all the substances which constitute the food of man must be divided into two great classes, one of which serves for the nutrition and reproduction of the animal body, whilst the other ministers to quite different purposes. thus starch, gum, sugar, beer, wine, spirits, &c., furnish no element capable of entering into the composition of blood, muscular fibre, or any part which is the seat of the vital principle. it must surely be universally interesting to trace the great change our views have undergone upon these subjects, as well as to become acquainted with the researches from which our present knowledge is derived. the primary conditions of the maintenance of animal life, are a constant supply of certain matters, animal food, and of oxygen, in the shape of atmospheric air. during every moment of life, oxygen is absorbed from the atmosphere in the organs of respiration, and the act of breathing cannot cease while life continues. the observations of physiologists have demonstrated that the body of an adult man supplied abundantly with food, neither increases nor diminishes in weight during twenty-four hours, and yet the quantity of oxygen absorbed into his system, in that period, is very considerable. according to the experiments of lavoisier, an adult man takes into his system from the atmosphere, in one year, no less than pounds weight of oxygen; the calculations of menzies make the quantity amount even to pounds; but we find his weight at the end of the year either exactly the same or different one way or the other by at most a few pounds. what, it may be asked, has become of the enormous amount of oxygen thus introduced into the human system in the course of one year? we can answer this question satisfactorily. no part of the oxygen remains in the body, but is given out again, combined with carbon and hydrogen. the carbon and hydrogen of certain parts of the animal body combine with the oxygen introduced through the lungs and skin, and pass off in the forms of carbonic acid and vapour of water. at every expiration and every moment of life, a certain amount of its elements are separated from the animal organism, having entered into combination with the oxygen of the atmosphere. in order to obtain a basis for the approximate calculation, we may assume, with lavoisier and seguin, that an adult man absorbs into his system / ounces of oxygen daily,--that is, , cubic inches = , grains, french weight; and further, that the weight of the whole mass of his blood is pounds, of which per cent. is water. now, from the known composition of the blood, we know that in order to convert its whole amount of carbon and hydrogen into carbonic acid and water, . grains of oxygen are required. this quantity will be taken into the system in four days and five hours. whether the oxygen enters into combination directly with the elements of the blood, or with the carbon and hydrogen of other parts of the body, it follows inevitably--the weight of the body remaining unchanged and in a normal condition--that as much of these elements as will suffice to supply pounds of blood, must be taken into the system in four days and five hours; and this necessary amount is furnished by the food. we have not, however, remained satisfied with mere approximation: we have determined accurately, in certain cases, the quantity of carbon taken daily in the food, and of that which passes out of the body in the faeces and urine combined--that is, uncombined with oxygen; and from these investigations it appears that an adult man taking moderate exercise consumes . ounces of carbon, which pass off through the skin and lungs as carbonic acid gas. [ ] it requires ounces of oxygen to convert / of carbon into carbonic acid. again; according to the analysis of boussingault, (annales de chim. et de phys., lxx. i. p. ), a horse consumes / ounces of carbon in twenty-four hours, a milch cow / ounces; so that the horse requires pounds / ounces, and the cow pounds / ounces of oxygen. [ ] as no part of the oxygen taken into the system of an animal is given off in any other form than combined with carbon or hydrogen, and as in a normal condition, or state of health, the carbon and hydrogen so given off are replaced by those elements in the food, it is evident that the amount of nourishment required by an animal for its support must be in a direct ratio with the quantity of oxygen taken in to its system. two animals which in equal times take up by means of the lungs and skin unequal quantities of oxygen, consume an amount of food unequal in the same ratio. the consumption of oxygen in a given time may be expressed by the number of respirations; it is, therefore, obvious that in the same animal the quantity of nourishment required must vary with the force and number of respirations. a child breathes quicker than an adult, and, consequently, requires food more frequently and proportionably in larger quantity, and bears hunger less easily. a bird deprived of food dies on the third day, while a serpent, confined under a bell, respires so slowly that the quantity of carbonic acid generated in an hour can scarcely be observed, and it will live three months, or longer, without food. the number of respirations is fewer in a state of rest than during labour or exercise: the quantity of food necessary in both cases must be in the same ratio. an excess of food, a want of a due amount of respired oxygen, or of exercise, as also great exercise (which obliges us to take an increased supply of food), together with weak organs of digestion, are incompatible with health. but the quantity of oxygen received by an animal through the lungs not only depends upon the number of respirations, but also upon the temperature of the respired air. the size of the thorax of an animal is unchangeable; we may therefore regard the volume of air which enters at every inspiration as uniform. but its weight, and consequently the amount of oxygen it contains, is not constant. air is expanded by heat, and contracted by cold--an equal volume of hot and cold air contains, therefore, an unequal amount of oxygen. in summer atmospheric air contains water in the form of vapour, it is nearly deprived of it in winter; the volume of oxygen in the same volume of air is smaller in summer than in winter. in summer and winter, at the pole and at the equator, we inspire an equal volume of air; the cold air is warmed during respiration and acquires the temperature of the body. in order, therefore, to introduce into the lungs a given amount of oxygen, less expenditure of force is necessary in winter than in summer, and for the same expenditure of force more oxygen is inspired in winter. it is also obvious that in an equal number of respirations we consume more oxygen at the level of the sea than on a mountain. the oxygen taken into the system is given out again in the same form, both in summer and winter: we expire more carbon at a low than at a high temperature, and require more or less carbon in our food in the same proportion; and, consequently, more is respired in sweden than in sicily, and in our own country and eighth more in winter than in summer. even if an equal weight of food is consumed in hot and cold climates, infinite wisdom has ordained that very unequal proportions of carbon shall be taken in it. the food prepared for the inhabitants of southern climes does not contain in a fresh state more than per cent. of carbon, while the blubber and train oil which feed the inhabitants of polar regions contain to per cent. of that element. from the same cause it is comparatively easy to be temperate in warm climates, or to bear hunger for a long time under the equator; but cold and hunger united very soon produce exhaustion. the oxygen of the atmosphere received into the blood in the lungs, and circulated throughout every part of the animal body, acting upon the elements of the food, is the source of animal heat. [footnote : this account is deduced from observations made upon the average daily consumption of about soldiers in barracks. the food of these men, consisting of meat, bread, potatoes, lentils, peas, beans, butter, salt, pepper, &c., was accurately weighed during a month, and each article subjected to ultimate analysis. of the quantity of food, beer, and spirits, taken by the men when out of barracks, we have a close approximation from the report of the sergeant; and from the weight and analysis of the faeces and urine, it appears that the carbon which passes off through these channels may be considered equivalent to the amount taken in that portion of the food, and of sour-crout, which was not included in the estimate.] [footnote : . ounces = . kilogramme.] letter vii my dear sir, the source of animal heat, its laws, and the influence it exerts upon the functions of the animal body, constitute a curious and highly interesting subject, to which i would now direct your attention. all living creatures, whose existence depends upon the absorption of oxygen, possess within themselves a source of heat, independent of surrounding objects. this general truth applies to all animals, and extends to the seed of plants in the act of germination, to flower-buds when developing, and fruits during their maturation. in the animal body, heat is produced only in those parts to which arterial blood, and with it the oxygen absorbed in respiration, is conveyed. hair, wool, and feathers, receive no arterial blood, and, therefore, in them no heat is developed. the combination of a combustible substance with oxygen is, under all circumstances, the only source of animal heat. in whatever way carbon may combine with oxygen, the act of combination is accompanied by the disengagement of heat. it is indifferent whether this combination takes place rapidly or slowly, at a high or at a low temperature: the amount of heat liberated is a constant quantity. the carbon of the food, being converted into carbonic acid within the body, must give out exactly as much heat as if it had been directly burnt in oxygen gas or in common air; the only difference is, the production of the heat is diffused over unequal times. in oxygen gas the combustion of carbon is rapid and the heat intense; in atmospheric air it burns slower and for a longer time, the temperature being lower; in the animal body the combination is still more gradual, and the heat is lower in proportion. it is obvious that the amount of heat liberated must increase or diminish with the quantity of oxygen introduced in equal times by respiration. those animals, therefore, which respire frequently, and consequently consume much oxygen, possess a higher temperature than others, which, with a body of equal size to be heated, take into the system less oxygen. the temperature of a child ( deg) is higher than that of an adult ( / deg). that of birds ( deg to . deg) is higher than that of quadrupeds ( / deg to . deg) or than that of fishes or amphibia, whose proper temperature is from . to . deg higher than that of the medium in which they live. all animals, strictly speaking, are warm-blooded; but in those only which possess lungs is the temperature of the body quite independent of the surrounding medium. the most trustworthy observations prove that in all climates, in the temperate zones as well as at the equator or the poles, the temperature of the body in man, and in what are commonly called warm-blooded animals, is invariably the same; yet how different are the circumstances under which they live! the animal body is a heated mass, which bears the same relation to surrounding objects as any other heated mass. it receives heat when the surrounding objects are hotter, it loses heat when they are colder, than itself. we know that the rapidity of cooling increases with the difference between the temperature of the heated body and that of the surrounding medium; that is, the colder the surrounding medium the shorter the time required for the cooling of the heated body. how unequal, then, must be the loss of heat in a man at palermo, where the external temperature is nearly equal to that of the body, and in the polar regions, where the external temperature is from deg to deg lower! yet, notwithstanding this extremely unequal loss of heat, experience has shown that the blood of the inhabitant of the arctic circle has a temperature as high as that of the native of the south, who lives in so different a medium. this fact, when its true significance is perceived, proves that the heat given off to the surrounding medium is restored within the body with great rapidity. this compensation must consequently take place more rapidly in winter than in summer, at the pole than at the equator. now, in different climates the quantity of oxygen introduced into the system by respiration, as has been already shown, varies according to the temperature of the external air; the quantity of inspired oxygen increases with the loss of heat by external cooling, and the quantity of carbon or hydrogen necessary to combine with this oxygen must be increased in the same ratio. it is evident that the supply of the heat lost by cooling is effected by the mutual action of the elements of the food and the inspired oxygen, which combine together. to make use of a familiar, but not on that account a less just illustration, the animal body acts, in this respect, as a furnace, which we supply with fuel. it signifies nothing what intermediate forms food may assume, what changes it may undergo in the body; the last change is uniformly the conversion of its carbon into carbonic acid, and of its hydrogen into water. the unassimilated nitrogen of the food, along with the unburned or unoxidised carbon, is expelled in the urine or in the solid excrements. in order to keep up in the furnace a constant temperature, we must vary the supply of fuel according to the external temperature, that is, according to the supply of oxygen. in the animal body the food is the fuel; with a proper supply of oxygen we obtain the heat given out during its oxidation or combustion. in winter, when we take exercise in a cold atmosphere, and when consequently the amount of inspired oxygen increases, the necessity for food containing carbon and hydrogen increases in the same ratio; and by gratifying the appetite thus excited, we obtain the most efficient protection against the most piercing cold. a starving man is soon frozen to death. the animals of prey in the arctic regions, as every one knows, far exceed in voracity those of the torrid zone. in cold and temperate climates, the air, which incessantly strives to consume the body, urges man to laborious efforts in order to furnish the means of resistance to its action, while, in hot climates, the necessity of labour to provide food is far less urgent. our clothing is merely an equivalent for a certain amount of food. the more warmly we are clothed the less urgent becomes the appetite for food, because the loss of heat by cooling, and consequently the amount of heat to be supplied by the food, is diminished. if we were to go naked, like certain savage tribes, or if in hunting or fishing we were exposed to the same degree of cold as the samoyedes, we should be able with ease to consume lbs. of flesh, and perhaps a dozen of tallow candles into the bargain, daily, as warmly clad travellers have related with astonishment of these people. we should then also be able to take the same quantity of brandy or train oil without bad effects, because the carbon and hydrogen of these substances would only suffice to keep up the equilibrium between the external temperature and that of our bodies. according to the preceding expositions, the quantity of food is regulated by the number of respirations, by the temperature of the air, and by the amount of heat given off to the surrounding medium. no isolated fact, apparently opposed to this statement, can affect the truth of this natural law. without temporary or permanent injury to health, the neapolitan cannot take more carbon and hydrogen in the shape of food than he expires as carbonic acid and water; and the esquimaux cannot expire more carbon and hydrogen than he takes in the system as food, unless in a state of disease or of starvation. let us examine these states a little more closely. the englishman in jamaica perceives with regret the disappearance of his appetite, previously a source of frequently recurring enjoyment; and he succeeds, by the use of cayenne pepper, and the most powerful stimulants, in enabling himself to take as much food as he was accustomed to eat at home. but the whole of the carbon thus introduced into the system is not consumed; the temperature of the air is too high, and the oppressive heat does not allow him to increase the number of respirations by active exercise, and thus to proportion the waste to the amount of food taken; disease of some kind, therefore, ensues. on the other hand, england sends her sick to southern regions, where the amount of the oxygen inspired is diminished in a very large proportion. those whose diseased digestive organs have in a greater or less degree lost the power of bringing the food into the state best adapted for oxidation, and therefore are less able to resist the oxidising influence of the atmosphere of their native climate, obtain a great improvement in health. the diseased organs of digestion have power to place the diminished amount of food in equilibrium with the inspired oxygen, in the mild climate; whilst in a colder region the organs of respiration themselves would have been consumed in furnishing the necessary resistance to the action of the atmospheric oxygen. in our climate, hepatic diseases, or those arising from excess of carbon, prevail in summer; in winter, pulmonary diseases, or those arising from excess of oxygen, are more frequent. the cooling of the body, by whatever cause it may be produced, increases the amount of food necessary. the mere exposure to the open air, in a carriage or on the deck of a ship, by increasing radiation and vaporisation, increases the loss of heat, and compels us to eat more than usual. the same is true of those who are accustomed to drink large quantities of cold water, which is given off at the temperature of the body, / deg. it increases the appetite, and persons of weak constitution find it necessary, by continued exercise, to supply to the system the oxygen required to restore the heat abstracted by the cold water. loud and long continued speaking, the crying of infants, moist air, all exert a decided and appreciable influence on the amount of food which is taken. we have assumed that carbon and hydrogen especially, by combining with oxygen, serve to produce animal heat. in fact, observation proves that the hydrogen of the food plays a no less important part than the carbon. the whole process of respiration appears most clearly developed, when we consider the state of a man, or other animal, totally deprived of food. the first effect of starvation is the disappearance of fat, and this fat cannot be traced either in the urine or in the scanty faeces. its carbon and hydrogen have been given off through the skin and lungs in the form of oxidised products; it is obvious that they have served to support respiration. in the case of a starving man, / oz. of oxygen enter the system daily, and are given out again in combination with a part of his body. currie mentions the case of an individual who was unable to swallow, and whose body lost lbs. in weight during a month; and, according to martell (trans. linn. soc., vol. xi. p. ), a fat pig, overwhelmed in a slip of earth, lived days without food, and was found to have diminished in weight, in that time, more than lbs. the whole history of hybernating animals, and the well-established facts of the periodical accumulation, in various animals, of fat, which, at other periods, entirely disappears, prove that the oxygen, in the respiratory process, consumes, without exception, all such substances as are capable of entering into combination with it. it combines with whatever is presented to it; and the deficiency of hydrogen is the only reason why carbonic acid is the chief product; for, at the temperature of the body, the affinity of hydrogen for oxygen far surpasses that of carbon for the same element. we know, in fact, that the graminivora expire a volume of carbonic acid equal to that of the oxygen inspired, while the carnivora, the only class of animals whose food contains fat, inspire more oxygen than is equal in volume to the carbonic acid expired. exact experiments have shown, that in many cases only half the volume of oxygen is expired in the form of carbonic acid. these observations cannot be gainsaid, and are far more convincing than those arbitrary and artificially produced phenomena, sometimes called experiments; experiments which, made as too often they are, without regard to the necessary and natural conditions, possess no value, and may be entirely dispensed with; especially when, as in the present case, nature affords the opportunity for observation, and when we make a rational use of that opportunity. in the progress of starvation, however, it is not only the fat which disappears, but also, by degrees all such of the solids as are capable of being dissolved. in the wasted bodies of those who have suffered starvation, the muscles are shrunk and unnaturally soft, and have lost their contractibility; all those parts of the body which were capable of entering into the state of motion have served to protect the remainder of the frame from the destructive influence of the atmosphere. towards the end, the particles of the brain begin to undergo the process of oxidation, and delirium, mania, and death close the scene; that is to say, all resistance to the oxidising power of the atmospheric oxygen ceases, and the chemical process of eremacausis, or decay, commences, in which every part of the body, the bones excepted, enters into combination with oxygen. the time which is required to cause death by starvation depends on the amount of fat in the body, on the degree of exercise, as in labour or exertion of any kind, on the temperature of the air, and finally, on the presence or absence of water. through the skin and lungs there escapes a certain quantity of water, and as the presence of water is essential to the continuance of the vital motions, its dissipation hastens death. cases have occurred, in which a full supply of water being accessible to the sufferer, death has not occurred till after the lapse of twenty days. in one case, life was sustained in this way for the period of sixty days. in all chronic diseases death is produced by the same cause, namely, the chemical action of the atmosphere. when those substances are wanting, whose function in the organism is to support the process of respiration, when the diseased organs are incapable of performing their proper function of producing these substances, when they have lost the power of transforming the food into that shape in which it may, by entering into combination with the oxygen of the air, protect the system from its influence, then, the substance of the organs themselves, the fat of the body, the substance of the muscles, the nerves, and the brain, are unavoidably consumed. the true cause of death in these cases is the respiratory process, that is, the action of the atmosphere. a deficiency of food, and a want of power to convert the food into a part of the organism, are both, equally, a want of resistance; and this is the negative cause of the cessation of the vital process. the flame is extinguished, because the oil is consumed; and it is the oxygen of the air which has consumed it. in many diseases substances are produced which are incapable of assimilation. by the mere deprivation of food, these substances are removed from the body without leaving a trace behind; their elements have entered into combination with the oxygen of the air. from the first moment that the function of the lungs or of the skin is interrupted or disturbed, compounds, rich in carbon, appear in the urine, which acquires a brown colour. over the whole surface of the body oxygen is absorbed, and combines with all the substances which offer no resistance to it. in those parts of the body where the access of oxygen is impeded; for example, in the arm-pits, or in the soles of the feet, peculiar compounds are given out, recognisable by their appearance, or by their odour. these compounds contain much carbon. respiration is the falling weight--the bent spring, which keeps the clock in motion; the inspirations and expirations are the strokes of the pendulum which regulate it. in our ordinary time-pieces, we know with mathematical accuracy the effect produced on their rate of going, by changes in the length of the pendulum, or in the external temperature. few, however, have a clear conception of the influence of air and temperature on the health of the human body; and yet the research into the conditions necessary to keep it in the normal state is not more difficult than in the case of a clock. letter viii my dear sir, having attempted in my last letter to explain to you the simple and admirable office subserved by the oxygen of the atmosphere in its combination with carbon in the animal body, i will now proceed to present you with some remarks upon those materials which sustain its mechanisms in motion, and keep up their various functions,--namely, the aliments. if the increase in mass in an animal body, the development and reproduction of its organs depend upon the blood, then those substances only which are capable of being converted into blood can be properly regarded as nourishment. in order then to ascertain what parts of our food are nutritious, we must compare the composition of the blood with the composition of the various articles taken as food. two substances require especial consideration as the chief ingredients of the blood; one of these separates immediately from the blood when it is withdrawn from the circulation. it is well known that in this case blood coagulates, and separates into a yellowish liquid, the serum of the blood, and a gelatinous mass, which adheres to a rod or stick in soft, elastic fibres, when coagulating blood is briskly stirred. this is the fibrine of the blood, which is identical in all its properties with muscular fibre, when the latter is purified from all foreign matters. the second principal ingredient of the blood is contained in the serum, and gives to this liquid all the properties of the white of eggs, with which it is indeed identical. when heated, it coagulates into a white elastic mass, and the coagulating substance is called albumen. fibrine and albumen, the chief ingredients of blood, contain, in all, seven chemical elements, among which nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulphur are found. they contain also the earth of bones. the serum retains in solution sea salt and other salts of potash and soda, in which the acids are carbonic, phosphoric, and sulphuric acids. the globules of the blood contain fibrine and albumen, along with a red colouring matter, in which iron is a constant element. besides these, the blood contains certain fatty bodies in small quantity, which differ from ordinary fats in several of their properties. chemical analysis has led to the remarkable result, that fibrine and albumen contain the same organic elements united in the same proportion,--i.e., that they are isomeric, their chemical composition--the proportion of their ultimate elements--being identical. but the difference of their external properties shows that the particles of which they are composed are arranged in a different order. (see letter v). this conclusion has lately been beautifully confirmed by a distinguished physiologist (denis), who has succeeded in converting fibrine into albumen, that is, in giving it the solubility, and coagulability by heat, which characterise the white of egg. fibrine and albumen, besides having the same composition, agree also in this, that both dissolve in concentrated muriatic acid, yielding a solution of an intense purple colour. this solution, whether made with fibrine or albumen, has the very same re-actions with all substances yet tried. both albumen and fibrine, in the process of nutrition, are capable of being converted into muscular fibre, and muscular fibre is capable of being reconverted into blood. these facts have long been established by physiologists, and chemistry has merely proved that these metamorphoses can be accomplished under the influence of a certain force, without the aid of a third substance, or of its elements, and without the addition of any foreign element, or the separation of any element previously present in these substances. if we now compare the composition of all organised parts with that of fibrine and albumen, the following relations present themselves:-- all parts of the animal body which have a decided shape, which form parts of organs, contain nitrogen. no part of an organ which possesses motion and life is destitute of nitrogen; all of them contain likewise carbon and the elements of water; the latter, however, in no case in the proportion to form water. the chief ingredients of the blood contain nearly per cent. of nitrogen, and from numerous analyses it appears that no part of an organ contains less than per cent. of nitrogen. the most convincing experiments and observations have proved that the animal body is absolutely incapable of producing an elementary body, such as carbon or nitrogen, out of substances which do not contain it; and it obviously follows, that all kinds of food fit for the production either of blood, or of cellular tissue, membranes, skin, hair, muscular fibre, &c., must contain a certain amount of nitrogen, because that element is essential to the composition of the above-named organs; because the organs cannot create it from the other elements presented to them; and, finally, because no nitrogen is absorbed from the atmosphere in the vital process. the substance of the brain and nerves contains a large quantity of albumen, and, in addition to this, two peculiar fatty acids, distinguished from other fats by containing phosphorus (phosphoric acid?). one of these contains nitrogen (fremy). finally, water and common fat are those ingredients of the body which are destitute of nitrogen. both are amorphous or unorganised, and only so far take part in the vital process as that their presence is required for the due performance of the vital functions. the inorganic constituents of the body are, iron, lime, magnesia, common salt, and the alkalies. the nutritive process is seen in its simplest form in carnivorous animals. this class of animals lives on the blood and flesh of the graminivora; but this blood and flesh are, in all their properties, identical with their own. neither chemical nor physiological differences can be discovered. the nutriment of carnivorous animals is derived originally from blood; in their stomach it becomes dissolved, and capable of reaching all other parts of the body; in its passage it is again converted into blood, and from this blood are reproduced all those parts of their organisation which have undergone change or metamorphosis. with the exception of hoofs, hair, feathers, and the earth of bones, every part of the food of carnivorous animals is capable of assimilation. in a chemical sense, therefore, it may be said that a carnivorous animal, in supporting the vital process, consumes itself. that which serves for its nutrition is identical with those parts of its organisation which are to be renewed. the process of nutrition in graminivorous animals appears at first sight altogether different. their digestive organs are less simple, and their food consists of vegetables, the great mass of which contains but little nitrogen. from what substances, it may be asked, is the blood formed, by means of which of their organs are developed? this question may be answered with certainty. chemical researches have shown, that all such parts of vegetables as can afford nutriment to animals contain certain constituents which are rich in nitrogen; and the most ordinary experience proves that animals require for their support and nutrition less of these parts of plants in proportion as they abound in the nitrogenised constituents. animals cannot be fed on matters destitute of these nitrogenised constituents. these important products of vegetation are especially abundant in the seeds of the different kinds of grain, and of peas, beans, and lentils; in the roots and the juices of what are commonly called vegetables. they exist, however, in all plants, without exception, and in every part of plants in larger or smaller quantity. these nitrogenised forms of nutriment in the vegetable kingdom may be reduced to three substances, which are easily distinguished by their external characters. two of them are soluble in water, the third is insoluble. when the newly-expressed juices of vegetables are allowed to stand, a separation takes place in a few minutes. a gelatinous precipitate, commonly of a green tinge, is deposited, and this, when acted on by liquids which remove the colouring matter, leaves a grayish white substance, well known to druggists as the deposite from vegetable juices. this is one of the nitrogenised compounds which serves for the nutrition of animals, and has been named vegetable fibrine. the juice of grapes is especially rich in this constituent, but it is most abundant in the seeds of wheat, and of the cerealia generally. it may be obtained from wheat flour by a mechanical operation, and in a state of tolerable purity; it is then called gluten, but the glutinous property belongs, not to vegetable fibrine, but to a foreign substance, present in small quantity, which is not found in the other cerealia. the method by which it is obtained sufficiently proves that it is insoluble in water; although we cannot doubt that it was originally dissolved in the vegetable juice, from which it afterwards separated, exactly as fibrine does from blood. the second nitrogenised compound remains dissolved in the juice after the separation of the fibrine. it does not separate from the juice at the ordinary temperature, but is instantly coagulated when the liquid containing it is heated to the boiling point. when the clarified juice of nutritious vegetables, such as cauliflower, asparagus, mangelwurzel, or turnips, is made to boil, a coagulum is formed, which it is absolutely impossible to distinguish from the substance which separates as a coagulum, when the serum of blood, or the white of an egg, diluted with water, are heated to the boiling point. this is vegetable albumen. it is found in the greatest abundance in certain seeds, in nuts, almonds, and others, in which the starch of the gramineae is replaced by oil. the third nitrogenised constituent of the vegetable food of animals is vegetable caseine. it is chiefly found in the seeds of peas, beans, lentils, and similar leguminous seeds. like vegetable albumen, it is soluble in water, but differs from it in this, that its solution is not coagulated by heat. when the solution is heated or evaporated, a skin forms on its surface, and the addition of an acid causes a coagulum, just as in animal milk. these three nitrogenised compounds, vegetable fibrine, albumen, and caseine, are the true nitrogenised constituents of the food of graminivorous animals; all other nitrogenised compounds occurring in plants, are either rejected by animals, as in the case of the characteristic principles of poisonous and medicinal plants, or else they occur in the food in such very small proportion, that they cannot possibly contribute to the increase of mass in the animal body. the chemical analysis of these three substances has led to the very interesting result that they contain the same organic elements, united in the same proportion by weight; and, what is still more remarkable, that they are identical in composition with the chief constituents of blood, animal fibrine, and albumen. they all three dissolve in concentrated muriatic acid with the same deep purple colour, and even in their physical characters, animal fibrine and albumen are in no respect different from vegetable fibrine and albumen. it is especially to be noticed, that by the phrase, identity of composition, we do not here intend mere similarity, but that even in regard to the presence and relative amount of sulphur, phosphorus, and phosphate of lime, no difference can be observed. how beautifully and admirably simple, with the aid of these discoveries, appears the process of nutrition in animals, the formation of their organs, in which vitality chiefly resides! those vegetable principles, which in animals are used to form blood, contain the chief constituents of blood, fibrine and albumen, ready formed, as far as regards their composition. all plants, besides, contain a certain quantity of iron, which reappears in the colouring matter of the blood. vegetable fibrine and animal fibrine, vegetable albumen and animal albumen, hardly differ, even in form; if these principles be wanting in the food, the nutrition of the animal is arrested; and when they are present, the graminivorous animal obtains in its food the very same principles on the presence of which the nutrition of the carnivora entirely depends. vegetables produce in their organism the blood of all animals, for the carnivora, in consuming the blood and flesh of the graminivora, consume, strictly speaking, only the vegetable principles which have served for the nutrition of the latter. vegetable fibrine and albumen take the form in the stomach of the graminivorous animal as animal fibrine and albumen do in that of the carnivorous animal. from what has been said, it follows that the development of the animal organism and its growth are dependent on the reception of certain principles identical with the chief constituents of blood. in this sense we may say that the animal organism gives to the blood only its form; that it is incapable of creating blood out of other substances which do not already contain the chief constituents of that fluid. we cannot, indeed, maintain that the animal organism has no power to form other compounds, for we know that it is capable of producing an extensive series of compounds, differing in composition from the chief constituents of blood; but these last, which form the starting-point of the series, it cannot produce. the animal organism is a higher kind of vegetable, the development of which begins with those substances with the production of which the life of an ordinary vegetable ends. as soon as the latter has borne seed, it dies, or a period of its life comes to a termination. in that endless series of compounds, which begins with carbonic acid, ammonia, and water, the sources of the nutrition of vegetables, and includes the most complex constituents of the animal brain, there is no blank, no interruption. the first substance capable of affording nutriment to animals is the last product of the creative energy of vegetables. the substance of cellular tissue and of membranes, of the brain and nerves, these the vegetable cannot produce. the seemingly miraculous in the productive agency of vegetables disappears in a great degree, when we reflect that the production of the constituents of blood cannot appear more surprising than the occurrence of the fat of beef and mutton in cocoa beans, of human fat in olive-oil, of the principal ingredient of butter in palm-oil, and of horse fat and train-oil in certain oily seeds. letter ix my dear sir, the facts detailed in my last letter will satisfy you as to the manner in which the increase of mass in an animal, that is, its growth, is accomplished; we have still to consider a most important question, namely, the function performed in the animal system by substances destitute of nitrogen; such as sugar, starch, gum, pectine, &c. the most extensive class of animals, the graminivora, cannot live without these substances; their food must contain a certain amount of one or more of them, and if these compounds are not supplied, death quickly ensues. this important inquiry extends also to the constituents of the food of carnivorous animals in the earliest periods of life; for this food also contains substances, which are not necessary for their support in the adult state. the nutrition of the young of carnivora is obviously accomplished by means similar to those by which the graminivora are nourished; their development is dependent on the supply of a fluid, which the body of the mother secretes in the shape of milk. milk contains only one nitrogenised constituent, known under the name of caseine; besides this, its chief ingredients are butter (fat), and sugar of milk. the blood of the young animal, its muscular fibre, cellular tissue, nervous matter, and bones, must have derived their origin from the nitrogenised constituent of milk--the caseine; for butter and sugar of milk contain no nitrogen. now, the analysis of caseine has led to the result, which, after the details i have given, can hardly excite your surprise, that this substance also is identical in composition with the chief constituents of blood, fibrine and albumen. nay more--a comparison of its properties with those of vegetable caseine has shown--that these two substances are identical in all their properties; insomuch, that certain plants, such as peas, beans, and lentils, are capable of producing the same substance which is formed from the blood of the mother, and employed in yielding the blood of the young animal. the young animal, therefore, receives in the form of caseine,--which is distinguished from fibrine and albumen by its great solubility, and by not coagulating when heated,--the chief constituent of the mother's blood. to convert caseine into blood no foreign substance is required, and in the conversion of the mother's blood into caseine, no elements of the constituents of the blood have been separated. when chemically examined, caseine is found to contain a much larger proportion of the earth of bones than blood does, and that in a very soluble form, capable of reaching every part of the body. thus, even in the earliest period of its life, the development of the organs, in which vitality resides, is, in the carnivorous animal, dependent on the supply of a substance, identical in organic composition with the chief constituents of its blood. what, then, is the use of the butter and the sugar of milk? how does it happen that these substances are indispensable to life? butter and sugar of milk contain no fixed bases, no soda nor potash. sugar of milk has a composition closely allied to that of the other kinds of sugar, of starch, and of gum; all of them contain carbon and the elements of water, the latter precisely in the proportion to form water. there is added, therefore, by means of these compounds, to the nitrogenised constituents of food, a certain amount of carbon; or, as in the case of butter, of carbon and hydrogen; that is, an excess of elements, which cannot possibly be employed in the production of blood, because the nitrogenised substances contained in the food already contain exactly the amount of carbon which is required for the production of fibrine and albumen. in an adult carnivorous animal, which neither gains nor loses weight, perceptibly, from day to day, its nourishment, the waste of organised tissue, and its consumption of oxygen, stand to each other in a well-defined and fixed relation. the carbon of the carbonic acid given off, with that of the urine; the nitrogen of the urine, and the hydrogen given off as ammonia and water; these elements, taken together, must be exactly equal in weight to the carbon, nitrogen, and hydrogen of the metamorphosed tissues, and since these last are exactly replaced by the food, to the carbon, nitrogen, and hydrogen of the food. were this not the case, the weight of the animal could not possibly remain unchanged. but, in the young of the carnivora, the weight does not remain unchanged; on the contrary, it increases from day to day by an appreciable quantity. this fact presupposes, that the assimilative process in the young animal is more energetic, more intense, than the process of transformation in the existing tissues. if both processes were equally active, the weight of the body could not increase; and were the waste by transformation greater, the weight of the body would decrease. now, the circulation in the young animal is not weaker, but, on the contrary, more rapid; the respirations are more frequent; and, for equal bulks, the consumption of oxygen must be greater rather than smaller in the young than in the adult animal. but, since the metamorphosis of organised parts goes on more slowly, there would ensue a deficiency of those substances, the carbon and hydrogen of which are adapted for combination with oxygen; because, in the carnivora, nature has destined the new compounds, produced by the metamorphosis of organised parts, to furnish the necessary resistance to the action of the oxygen, and to produce animal heat. what is wanting for these purposes an infinite wisdom has supplied to the young in its natural food. the carbon and hydrogen of butter, and the carbon of the sugar of milk, no part of either of which can yield blood, fibrine, or albumen, are destined for the support of the respiratory process, at an age when a greater resistance is opposed to the metamorphosis of existing organisms; or, in other words, to the production of compounds, which, in the adult state, are produced in quantity amply sufficient for the purpose of respiration. the young animal receives the constituents of its blood in the caseine of the milk. a metamorphosis of existing organs goes on, for bile and urine are secreted; the materials of the metamorphosed parts are given off in the form of urine, of carbonic acid, and of water; but the butter and sugar of milk also disappear; they cannot be detected in the faeces. the butter and sugar of milk are given out in the form of carbonic acid and water, and their conversion into oxidised products furnishes the clearest proof that far more oxygen is absorbed than is required to convert the carbon and hydrogen of the metamorphosed tissues into carbonic acid and water. the change and metamorphosis of organised tissues going on in the vital process in the young animal, consequently yield, in a given time, much less carbon and hydrogen in the form adapted for the respiratory process than correspond to the oxygen taken up in the lungs. the substance of its organised parts would undergo a more rapid consumption, and would necessarily yield to the action of the oxygen, were not the deficiency of carbon and hydrogen supplied from another source. the continued increase of mass, or growth, and the free and unimpeded development of the organs in the young animal, are dependent on the presence of foreign substances, which, in the nutritive process, have no other function than to protect the newly-formed organs from the action of the oxygen. the elements of these substances unite with the oxygen; the organs themselves could not do so without being consumed; that is, growth, or increase of mass in the body,--the consumption of oxygen remaining the same,--would be utterly impossible. the preceding considerations leave no doubt as to the purpose for which nature has added to the food of the young of carnivorous mammalia substances devoid of nitrogen, which their organism cannot employ for nutrition, strictly so called, that is, for the production of blood; substances which may be entirely dispensed with in their nourishment in the adult state. in the young of carnivorous birds, the want of all motion is an obvious cause of diminished waste in the organised parts; hence, milk is not provided for them. the nutritive process in the carnivora thus presents itself under two distinct forms; one of which we again meet with in the graminivora. in graminivorous animals, we observe, that during their whole life, their existence depends on a supply of substances having a composition identical with that of sugar of milk, or closely resembling it. everything that they consume as food contains a certain quantity of starch, gum, or sugar, mixed with other matters. the function performed in the vital process of the graminivora by these substances is indicated in a very clear and convincing manner, when we take into consideration the very small relative amount of the carbon which these animals consume in the nitrogenised constituents of their food, which bears no proportion whatever to the oxygen absorbed through the skin and lungs. a horse, for example, can be kept in perfectly good condition, if he obtain as food lbs. of hay and / lbs. of oats daily. if we now calculate the whole amount of nitrogen in these matters, as ascertained by analysis ( / per cent. in the hay, . per cent. in the oats), in the form of blood, that is, as fibrine and albumen, with the due proportion of water in blood ( per cent.), the horse receives daily no more than / oz. of nitrogen, corresponding to about lbs. of blood. but along with this nitrogen, that is, combined with it in the form of fibrine or albumen, the animal receives only about / oz. of carbon. without going further into the calculation, it will readily be admitted, that the volume of air inspired and expired by a horse, the quantity of oxygen consumed, and, as a necessary consequence, the amount of carbonic acid given out by the animal, are much greater than in the respiratory process in man. but an adult man consumes daily abut oz. of carbon, and the determination of boussingault, according to which a horse expires oz. daily, cannot be very far from the truth. in the nitrogenised constituents of his food, therefore, the horse receives rather less than the fifth part of the carbon which his organism requires for the support of the respiratory process; and we see that the wisdom of the creator has added to his food the four-fifths which are wanting, in various forms, as starch, sugar, &c. with which the animal must be supplied, or his organism will be destroyed by the action of the oxygen. it is obvious, that in the system of the graminivora, whose food contains so small a portion, relatively, of the constituents of the blood, the process of metamorphosis in existing tissues, and consequently their restoration or reproduction, must go on far less rapidly than in the carnivora. were this not the case, a vegetation a thousand times more luxuriant than the actual one would not suffice for their nourishment. sugar, gum, and starch, would no longer be necessary to support life in these animals, because, in that case, the products of the waste, or metamorphosis of the organised tissues, would contain enough carbon to support the respiratory process. letter x my dear sir, let me now apply the principles announced in the preceding letters to the circumstances of our own species. man, when confined to animal food, requires for his support and nourishment extensive sources of food, even more widely extended than the lion and tiger, because, when he has the opportunity, he kills without eating. a nation of hunters, on a limited space, is utterly incapable of increasing its numbers beyond a certain point, which is soon attained. the carbon necessary for respiration must be obtained from the animals, of which only a limited number can live on the space supposed. these animals collect from plants the constituents of their organs and of their blood, and yield them, in turn, to the savages who live by the chase alone. they, again, receive this food unaccompanied by those compounds, destitute of nitrogen, which, during the life of the animals, served to support the respiratory process. in such men, confined to an animal diet, it is the carbon of the flesh and of the blood which must take the place of starch and sugar. but lbs. of flesh contain no more carbon than lbs. of starch, and while the savage with one animal and an equal weight of starch should maintain life and health for a certain number of days, he would be compelled, if confined to flesh alone, in order to procure the carbon necessary for respiration, during the same time, to consume five such animals. it is easy to see, from these considerations, how close the connection is between agriculture and the multiplication of the human species. the cultivation of our crops has ultimately no other object than the production of a maximum of those substances which are adapted for assimilation and respiration, in the smallest possible space. grain and other nutritious vegetables yield us, not only in starch, sugar, and gum, the carbon which protects our organs from the action of oxygen, and produces in the organism the heat which is essential to life, but also in the form of vegetable fibrine, albumen, and caseine, our blood, from which the other parts of our body are developed. man, when confined to animal food, respires, like the carnivora, at the expense of the matters produced by the metamorphosis of organised tissues; and, just as the lion, tiger, hyaena, in the cages of a menagerie, are compelled to accelerate the waste of the organised tissues by incessant motion, in order to furnish the matter necessary for respiration, so, the savage, for the very same object, is forced to make the most laborious exertions, and go through a vast amount of muscular exercise. he is compelled to consume force merely in order to supply matter for respiration. cultivation is the economy of force. science teaches us the simplest means of obtaining the greatest effect with the smallest expenditure of power, and with given means to produce a maximum of force. the unprofitable exertion of power, the waste of force in agriculture, in other branches of industry, in science, or in social economy, is characteristic of the savage state, or of the want of knowledge. in accordance with what i have already stated, you will perceive that the substances of which the food of man is composed may be divided into two classes; into nitrogenised and non-nitrogenised. the former are capable of conversion into blood; the latter are incapable of this transformation. out of those substances which are adapted to the formation of blood, are formed all the organised tissues. the other class of substances, in the normal state of health, serve to support the process of respiration. the former may be called the plastic elements of nutrition; the latter, elements of respiration. among the former we reckon-- vegetable fibrine. vegetable albumen. vegetable caseine. animal flesh. animal blood. among the elements of respiration in our food, are-- fat. pectine. starch. bassorine. gum. wine. cane sugar. beer. grape sugar. spirits. sugar of milk. the most recent and exact researches have established as a universal fact, to which nothing yet known is opposed, that the nitrogenised constituents of vegetable food have a composition identical with that of the constituents of the blood. no nitrogenised compound, the composition of which differs from that of fibrine, albumen, and caseine, is capable of supporting the vital process in animals. the animal organism unquestionably possesses the power of forming, from the constituents of its blood, the substance of its membranes and cellular tissue, of the nerves and brain, and of the organic part of cartilages and bones. but the blood must be supplied to it perfect in everything but its form--that is, in its chemical composition. if this be not done, a period is rapidly put to the formation of blood, and consequently to life. this consideration enables us easily to explain how it happens that the tissues yielding gelatine or chondrine, as, for example, the gelatine of skin or of bones, are not adapted for the support of the vital process; for their composition is different from that of fibrine or albumen. it is obvious that this means nothing more than that those parts of the animal organism which form the blood do not possess the power of effecting a transformation in the arrangement of the elements of gelatine, or of those tissues which contain it. the gelatinous tissues, the gelatine of the bones, the membranes, the cells and the skin suffer, in the animal body, under the influence of oxygen and moisture, a progressive alteration; a part of these tissues is separated, and must be restored from the blood; but this alteration and restoration are obviously confined within very narrow limits. while, in the body of a starving or sick individual, the fat disappears and the muscular tissue takes once more the form of blood, we find that the tendons and membranes retain their natural condition, and the limbs of the dead body their connections, which depend on the gelatinous tissues. on the other hand, we see that the gelatine of bones devoured by a dog entirely disappears, while only the bone earth is found in his excrements. the same is true of man, when fed on food rich in gelatine, as, for example, strong soup. the gelatine is not to be found either in the urine or in the faeces, and consequently must have undergone a change, and must have served some purpose in the animal economy. it is clear that the gelatine must be expelled from the body in a form different from that in which it was introduced as food. when we consider the transformation of the albumen of the blood into a part of an organ composed of fibrine, the identity in composition of the two substances renders the change easily conceivable. indeed we find the change of a dissolved substance into an insoluble organ of vitality, chemically speaking, natural and easily explained, on account of this very identity of composition. hence the opinion is not unworthy of a closer investigation, that gelatine, when taken in the dissolved state, is again converted, in the body, into cellular tissue, membrane and cartilage; that it may serve for the reproduction of such parts of these tissues as have been wasted, and for their growth. and when the powers of nutrition in the whole body are affected by a change of the health, then, even should the power of forming blood remain the same, the organic force by which the constituents of the blood are transformed into cellular tissue and membranes must necessarily be enfeebled by sickness. in the sick man, the intensity of the vital force, its power to produce metamorphoses, must be diminished as well in the stomach as in all other parts of the body. in this condition, the uniform experience of practical physicians shows that gelatinous matters in a dissolved state exercise a most decided influence on the state of the health. given in a form adapted for assimilation, they serve to husband the vital force, just as may be done, in the case of the stomach, by due preparation of the food in general. brittleness in the bones of graminivorous animals is clearly owing to a weakness in those parts of the organism whose function it is to convert the constituents of the blood into cellular tissue and membrane; and if we can trust to the reports of physicians who have resided in the east, the turkish women, in their diet of rice, and in the frequent use of enemata of strong soup, have united the conditions necessary for the formation both of cellular tissue and of fat. letter xi my dear sir, in the immense, yet limited expanse of the ocean, the animal and vegetable kingdoms are mutually dependent upon, and successive to each other. the animals obtain their constituent elements from the plants, and restore them to the water in their original form, when they again serve as nourishment to a new generation of plants. the oxygen which marine animals withdraw in their respiration from the air, dissolved in sea water, is returned to the water by the vital processes of sea plants; that air is richer in oxygen than atmospheric air, containing to per cent. oxygen, also, combines with the products of the putrefaction of dead animal bodies, changes their carbon into carbonic acid, their hydrogen into water, and their nitrogen assumes again the form of ammonia. thus we observe in the ocean a circulation takes place without the addition or subtraction of any element, unlimited in duration, although limited in extent, inasmuch as in a confined space the nourishment of plants exists in a limited quantity. we well know that marine plants cannot derive a supply of humus for their nourishment through their roots. look at the great sea-tang, the fucus giganteus: this plant, according to cook, reaches a height of feet, and a single specimen, with its immense ramifications, nourishes thousands of marine animals, yet its root is a small body, no larger than the fist. what nourishment can this draw from a naked rock, upon the surface of which there is no perceptible change? it is quite obvious that these plants require only a hold,--a fastening to prevent a change of place,--as a counterpoise to their specific gravity, which is less than that of the medium in which they float. that medium provides the necessary nourishment, and presents it to the surface of every part of the plant. sea-water contains not only carbonic acid and ammonia, but the alkaline and earthy phosphates and carbonates required by these plants for their growth, and which we always find as constant constituents of their ashes. all experience demonstrates that the conditions of the existence of marine plants are the same which are essential to terrestrial plants. but the latter do not live like sea-plants, in a medium which contains all their elements and surrounds with appropriate nourishment every part of their organs; on the contrary, they require two media, of which one, namely the soil, contains those essential elements which are absent from the medium surrounding them, i.e. the atmosphere. is it possible that we could ever be in doubt respecting the office which the soil and its component parts subserve in the existence and growth of vegetables?--that there should have been a time when the mineral elements of plants were not regarded as absolutely essential to their vitality? has not the same circulation been observed on the surface of the earth which we have just contemplated in the ocean,--the same incessant change, disturbance and restitution of equilibrium? experience in agriculture shows that the production of vegetables on a given surface increases with the supply of certain matters, originally parts of the soil which had been taken up from it by plants--the excrements of man and animals. these are nothing more than matters derived from vegetable food, which in the vital processes of animals, or after their death, assume again the form under which they originally existed, as parts of the soil. now, we know that the atmosphere contains none of these substances, and therefore can replace none; and we know that their removal from a soil destroys its fertility, which may be restored and increased by a new supply. is it possible, after so many decisive investigations into the origin of the elements of animals and vegetables, the use of the alkalies, of lime and the phosphates, any doubt can exist as to the principles upon which a rational agriculture depends? can the art of agriculture be based upon anything but the restitution of a disturbed equilibrium? can it be imagined that any country, however rich and fertile, with a flourishing commerce, which for centuries exports its produce in the shape of grain and cattle, will maintain its fertility, if the same commerce does not restore, in some form of manure, those elements which have been removed from the soil, and which cannot be replaced by the atmosphere? must not the same fate await every such country which has actually befallen the once prolific soil of virginia, now in many parts no longer able to grow its former staple productions--wheat and tobacco? in the large towns of england the produce both of english and foreign agriculture is largely consumed; elements of the soil indispensable to plants do not return to the fields,--contrivances resulting from the manners and customs of english people, and peculiar to them, render it difficult, perhaps impossible, to collect the enormous quantity of the phosphates which are daily, as solid and liquid excrements, carried into the rivers. these phosphates, although present in the soil in the smallest quantity, are its most important mineral constituents. it was observed that many english fields exhausted in that manner immediately doubled their produce, as if by a miracle, when dressed with bone earth imported from the continent. but if the export of bones from germany is continued to the extent it has hitherto reached, our soil must be gradually exhausted, and the extent of our loss may be estimated, by considering that one pound of bones contains as much phosphoric acid as a hundred-weight of grain. the imperfect knowledge of nature and the properties and relations of matter possessed by the alchemists gave rise, in their time, to an opinion that metals as well as plants could be produced from a seed. the regular forms and ramifications seen in crystals, they imagined to be the leaves and branches of metal plants; and as they saw the seed of plants grow, producing root, stem and leaves, and again blossoms, fruit and seeds, apparently without receiving any supply of appropriate material, they deemed it worthy of zealous inquiry to discover the seed of gold, and the earth necessary for its development. if the metal seeds were once obtained, might they not entertain hopes of their growth? such ideas could only be entertained when nothing was known of the atmosphere, and its participation with the earth, in administering to the vital processes of plants and animals. modern chemistry indeed produces the elements of water, and, combining them, forms water anew; but it does not create those elements--it derives them from water; the new-formed artificial water has been water before. many of our farmers are like the alchemists of old,--they are searching for the miraculous seed,--the means, which, without any further supply of nourishment to a soil scarcely rich enough to be sprinkled with indigenous plants, shall produce crops of grain a hundred-fold. the experience of centuries, nay, of thousands of years, is insufficient to guard men against these fallacies; our only security from these and similar absurdities must be derived from a correct knowledge of scientific principles. in the first period of natural philosophy, organic life was supposed to be derived from water only; afterwards, it was admitted that certain elements derived from the air must be superadded to the water; but we now know that other elements must be supplied by the earth, if plants are to thrive and multiply. the amount of materials contained in the atmosphere, suited to the nourishment of plants, is limited; but it must be abundantly sufficient to cover the whole surface of the earth with a rich vegetation. under the tropics, and in those parts of our globe where the most genial conditions of fertility exist,--a suitable soil, a moist atmosphere, and a high temperature,--vegetation is scarcely limited by space; and, where the soil is wanting, it is gradually supplied by the decaying leaves, bark and branches of plants. it is obvious there is no deficiency of atmospheric nourishment for plants in those regions, nor are these wanting in our own cultivated fields: all that plants require for their development is conveyed to them by the incessant motions of the atmosphere. the air between the tropics contains no more than that of the arctic zones; and yet how different is the amount of produce of an equal surface of land in the two situations! this is easily explicable. all the plants of tropical climates, the oil and wax palms, the sugar cane, &c., contain only a small quantity of the elements of the blood necessary to the nutrition of animals, as compared with our cultivated plants. the tubers of the potato in chili, its native country, where the plant resembles a shrub, if collected from an acre of land, would scarcely suffice to maintain an irish family for a single day (darwin). the result of cultivation in those plants which serve as food, is to produce in them those constituents of the blood. in the absence of the elements essential to these in the soil, starch, sugar and woody fibre, are perhaps formed; but no vegetable fibrine, albumen, or caseine. if we intend to produce on a given surface of soil more of these latter matters than the plants can obtain from the atmosphere or receive from the soil of the same surface in its uncultivated and normal state, we must create an artificial atmosphere, and add the needed elements to the soil. the nourishment which must be supplied in a given time to different plants, in order to admit a free and unimpeded growth, is very unequal. on pure sand, on calcareous soil, on naked rocks, only a few genera of plants prosper, and these are, for the most part, perennial plants. they require, for their slow growth, only such minute quantities of mineral substances as the soil can furnish, which may be totally barren for other species. annual, and especially summer plants, grow and attain their perfection in a comparatively short time; they therefore do not prosper on a soil which is poor in those mineral substances necessary to their development. to attain a maximum in height in the short period of their existence, the nourishment contained in the atmosphere is not sufficient. if the end of cultivation is to be obtained, we must create in the soil an artificial atmosphere of carbonic acid and ammonia; and this surplus of nourishment, which the leaves cannot appropriate from the air, must be taken up by the corresponding organs, i.e. the roots, from the soil. but the ammonia, together with the carbonic acid, are alone insufficient to become part of a plant destined to the nourishment of animals. in the absence of the alkalies, the phosphates and other earthy salts, no vegetable fibrine, no vegetable caseine, can be formed. the phosphoric acid of the phosphate of lime, indispensable to the cerealia and other vegetables in the formation of their seeds, is separated as an excrement, in great quantities, by the rind and barks of ligneous plants. how different are the evergreen plants, the cacti, the mosses, the ferns, and the pines, from our annual grasses, the cerealia and leguminous vegetables! the former, at every time of the day during winter and summer, obtain carbon through their leaves by absorbing carbonic acid which is not furnished by the barren soil on which they grow; water is also absorbed and retained by their coriaceous or fleshy leaves with great force. they lose very little by evaporation, compared with other plants. on the other hand, how very small is the quantity of mineral substances which they withdraw from the soil during their almost constant growth in one year, in comparison with the quantity which one crop of wheat of an equal weight receives in three months! it is by means of moisture that plants receive the necessary alkalies and salts from the soil. in dry summers a phenomenon is observed, which, when the importance of mineral elements to the life of a plant was unknown, could not be explained. the leaves of plants first developed and perfected, and therefore nearer the surface of the soil, shrivel up and become yellow, lose their vitality, and fall off while the plant is in an active state of growth, without any visible cause. this phenomenon is not seen in moist years, nor in evergreen plants, and but rarely in plants which have long and deep roots, nor is it seen in perennials in autumn and winter. the cause of this premature decay is now obvious. the perfectly-developed leaves absorb continually carbonic acid and ammonia from the atmosphere, which are converted into elements of new leaves, buds, and shoots; but this metamorphosis cannot be effected without the aid of the alkalies, and other mineral substances. if the soil is moist, the latter are continually supplied to an adequate amount, and the plant retains its lively green colour; but if this supply ceases from a want of moisture to dissolve the mineral elements, a separation takes place in the plant itself. the mineral constituents of the juice are withdrawn from the leaves already formed, and are used for the formation of the young shoots; and as soon as the seeds are developed, the vitality of the leaves completely ceases. these withered leaves contain only minute traces of soluble salts, while the buds and shoots are very rich in them. on the other hand, it has been observed, that where a soil is too highly impregnated with soluble saline materials, these are separated upon the surface of the leaves. this happens to culinary vegetables especially, whose leaves become covered with a white crust. in consequence of these exudations the plant sickens, its organic activity decreases, its growth is disturbed; and if this state continues long, the plant dies. this is most frequently seen in foliaceous plants, the large surfaces of which evaporate considerable quantities of water. carrots, pumpkins, peas, &c., are frequently thus diseased, when, after dry weather, the plant being near its full growth, the soil is moistened by short showers, followed again by dry weather. the rapid evaporation carries off the water absorbed by the root, and this leaves the salts in the plant in a far greater quantity than it can assimilate. these salts effloresce upon the surface of the leaves, and if they are herbaceous and juicy, produce an effect upon them as if they had been watered with a solution containing a greater quantity of salts than their organism can bear. of two plants of the same species, this disease befalls that which is nearest its perfection; if one should have been planted later, or be more backward in its development, the same external cause which destroys the one will contribute to the growth of the other. letter xii my dear sir, having now occupied several letters with the attempt to unravel, by means of chemistry, some of the most curious functions of the animal body, and, as i hope, made clear to you the distinctions between the two kinds of constituent elements in food, and the purposes they severally subserve in sustaining life, let me now direct your attention to a scarcely less interesting and equally important subject--the means of obtaining from a given surface of the earth the largest amount of produce adapted to the food of man and animals. agriculture is both a science and an art. the knowledge of all the conditions of the life of vegetables, the origin of their elements, and the sources of their nourishment, forms its scientific basis. from this knowledge we derive certain rules for the exercise of the art, the principles upon which the mechanical operations of farming depend, the usefulness or necessity of these for preparing the soil to support the growth of plants, and for removing every obnoxious influence. no experience, drawn from the exercise of the art, can be opposed to true scientific principles, because the latter should include all the results of practical operations, and are in some instances solely derived therefrom. theory must correspond with experience, because it is nothing more than the reduction of a series of phenomena to their last causes. a field in which we cultivate the same plant for several successive years becomes barren for that plant in a period varying with the nature of the soil: in one field it will be in three, in another in seven, in a third in twenty, in a fourth in a hundred years. one field bears wheat, and no peas; another beans or turnips, but no tobacco; a third gives a plentiful crop of turnips, but will not bear clover. what is the reason that a field loses its fertility for one plant, the same which at first flourished there? what is the reason one kind of plant succeeds in a field where another fails? these questions belong to science. what means are necessary to preserve to a field its fertility for one and the same plant?--what to render one field fertile for two, for three, for all plants? these last questions are put by art, but they cannot be answered by art. if a farmer, without the guidance of just scientific principles, is trying experiments to render a field fertile for a plant which it otherwise will not bear, his prospect of success is very small. thousands of farmers try such experiments in various directions, the result of which is a mass of practical experience forming a method of cultivation which accomplishes the desired end for certain places; but the same method frequently does not succeed, it indeed ceases to be applicable to a second or third place in the immediate neighbourhood. how large a capital, and how much power, are wasted in these experiments! very different, and far more secure, is the path indicated by science; it exposes us to no danger of failing, but, on the contrary, it furnishes us with every guarantee of success. if the cause of failure--of barrenness in the soil for one or two plants--has been discovered, means to remedy it may readily be found. the most exact observations prove that the method of cultivation must vary with the geognostical condition of the subsoil. in basalt, graywacke, porphyry, sandstone, limestone, &c., are certain elements indispensable to the growth of plants, and the presence of which renders them fertile. this fully explains the difference in the necessary methods of culture for different places; since it is obvious that the essential elements of the soil must vary with the varieties of composition of the rocks, from the disintegration of which they originated. wheat, clover, turnips, for example, each require certain elements from the soil; they will not flourish where the appropriate elements are absent. science teaches us what elements are essential to every species of plants by an analysis of their ashes. if therefore a soil is found wanting in any of those elements, we discover at once the cause of its barrenness, and its removal may now be readily accomplished. the empiric attributes all his success to the mechanical operations of agriculture; he experiences and recognises their value, without inquiring what are the causes of their utility, their mode of action: and yet this scientific knowledge is of the highest importance for regulating the application of power and the expenditure of capital,--for insuring its economical expenditure and the prevention of waste. can it be imagined that the mere passing of the ploughshare or the harrow through the soil--the mere contact of the iron--can impart fertility miraculously? nobody, perhaps, seriously entertains such an opinion. nevertheless, the modus operandi of these mechanical operations is by no means generally understood. the fact is quite certain, that careful ploughing exerts the most favourable influence: the surface is thus mechanically divided, changed, increased, and renovated; but the ploughing is only auxiliary to the end sought. in the effects of time, in what in agriculture are technically called fallows--the repose of the fields--we recognise by science certain chemical actions, which are continually exercised by the elements of the atmosphere upon the whole surface of our globe. by the action of its oxygen and its carbonic acid, aided by water, rain, changes of temperature, &c., certain elementary constituents of rocks, or of their ruins, which form the soil capable of cultivation, are rendered soluble in water, and consequently become separable from all their insoluble parts. these chemical actions, poetically denominates the "tooth of time," destroy all the works of man, and gradually reduce the hardest rocks to the condition of dust. by their influence the necessary elements of the soil become fitted for assimilation by plants; and it is precisely the end which is obtained by the mechanical operations of farming. they accelerate the decomposition of the soil, in order to provide a new generation of plants with the necessary elements in a condition favourable to their assimilation. it is obvious that the rapidity of the decomposition of a solid body must increase with the extension of its surface; the more points of contact we offer in a given time to the external chemical agent, the more rapid will be its action. the chemist, in order to prepare a mineral for analysis, to decompose it, or to increase the solubility of its elements, proceeds in the same way as the farmer deals with his fields--he spares no labour in order to reduce it to the finest powder; he separates the impalpable from the coarser parts by washing, and repeats his mechanical bruising and trituration, being assured his whole process will fail if he is inattentive to this essential and preliminary part of it. the influence which the increase of surface exercises upon the disintegration of rocks, and upon the chemical action of air and moisture, is strikingly illustrated upon a large scale in the operations pursued in the gold-mines of yaquil, in chili. these are described in a very interesting manner by darwin. the rock containing the gold ore is pounded by mills into the finest powder; this is subjected to washing, which separates the lighter particles from the metallic; the gold sinks to the bottom, while a stream of water carries away the lighter earthy parts into ponds, where it subsides to the bottom as mud. when this deposit has gradually filled up the pond, this mud is taken out and piled in heaps, and left exposed to the action of the atmosphere and moisture. the washing completely removes all the soluble part of the disintegrated rock; the insoluble part, moreover, cannot undergo any further change while it is covered with water, and so excluded from the influence of the atmosphere at the bottom of the pond. but being exposed at once to the air and moisture, a powerful chemical action takes place in the whole mass, which becomes indicated by an efflorescence of salts covering the whole surface of the heaps in considerable quantity. after being exposed for two or three years, the mud is again subjected to the same process of washing, and a considerable quantity of gold is obtained, this having been separated by the chemical process of decomposition in the mass. the exposure and washing of the same mud is repeated six or seven times, and at every washing it furnishes a new quantity of gold, although its amount diminishes every time. precisely similar is the chemical action which takes place in the soil of our fields; and we accelerate and increase it by the mechanical operations of our agriculture. by these we sever and extend the surface, and endeavour to make every atom of the soil accessible to the action of the carbonic acid and oxygen of the atmosphere. we thus produce a stock of soluble mineral substances, which serves as nourishment to a new generation of plants, materials which are indispensable to their growth and prosperity. letter xiii my dear sir, having in my last letter spoken of the general principles upon which the science and art of agriculture must be based, let me now direct your attention to some of those particulars between chemistry and agriculture, and demonstrate the impossibility of perfecting the important art of rearing food for man and animals, without a profound knowledge of our science. all plants cultivated as food require for their healthy sustenance the alkalies and alkaline earths, each in a certain proportion; and in addition to these, the cerealia do not succeed in a soil destitute of silica in a soluble condition. the combinations of this substance found as natural productions, namely, the silicates, differ greatly in the degree of facility with which they undergo decomposition, in consequence of the unequal resistance opposed by their integral parts to the dissolving power of the atmospheric agencies. thus the granite of corsica degenerates into a powder in a time which scarcely suffices to deprive the polished granite of heidelberg of its lustre. some soils abound in silicates so readily decomposable, that in every one or two years, as much silicate of potash becomes soluble and fitted for assimilation as is required by the leaves and straw of a crop of wheat. in hungary, extensive districts are not uncommon where wheat and tobacco have been grown alternately upon the same soil for centuries, the land never receiving back any of those mineral elements which were withdrawn in the grain and straw. on the other hand, there are fields in which the necessary amount of soluble silicate of potash for a single crop of wheat is not separated from the insoluble masses in the soil in less than two, three, or even more years. the term fallow, in agriculture, designates that period in which the soil, left to the influence of the atmosphere, becomes enriched with those soluble mineral constituents. fallow, however, does not generally imply an entire cessation of cultivation, but only an interval in the growth of the cerealia. that store of silicates and alkalies which is the principal condition of their success is obtained, if potatoes or turnips are grown upon the same fields in the intermediate periods, since these crops do not abstract a particle of silica, and therefore leave the field equally fertile for the following crop of wheat. the preceding remarks will render it obvious to you, that the mechanical working of the soil is the simplest and cheapest method of rendering the elements of nutrition contained in it accessible to plants. but it may be asked, are there not other means of decomposing the soil besides its mechanical subdivision?--are there not substances, which by their chemical operation will equally well or better render its constituents suitable for entering into vegetable organisms? yes: we certainly possess such substances, and one of them, namely, quick-lime, has been employed for the last century past in england for this purpose; and it would be difficult to find a substance better adapted to this service, as it is simple, and in almost all localities cheap and easily accessible. in order to obtain correct views respecting the effect of quick-lime upon the soil, let me remind you of the first process employed by the chemist when he is desirous of analysing a mineral, and for this purpose wishes to bring its elements into a soluble state. let the mineral to be examined be, for instance, feldspar; this substance, taken alone, even when reduced to the finest powder, requires for its solution to be treated with an acid for weeks or months; but if we first mix it with quick-lime, and expose the mixture to a moderately strong heat, the lime enters into chemical combination with certain elements of the feldspar, and its alkali (potass) is set free. and now the acid, even without heat, dissolves not only the lime, but also so much of the silica of the feldspar as to form a transparent jelly. the same effect which the lime in this process, with the aid of heat, exerts upon the feldspar, it produces when it is mixed with the alkaline argillaceous silicates, and they are for a long time kept together in a moist state. common potters' clay, or pipe-clay, diffused through water, and added to milk of lime, thickens immediately upon mixing; and if the mixture is kept for some months, and then treated with acid, the clay becomes gelatinous, which would not occur without the admixture with the lime. the lime, in combining with the elements of the clay, liquifies it; and, what is more remarkable, liberates the greater part of its alkalies. these interesting facts were first observed by fuchs, at munich: they have not only led to a more intimate knowledge of the nature and properties of the hydraulic cements, but, what is far more important, they explain the effects of caustic lime upon the soil, and guide the agriculturist in the application of an invaluable means of opening it, and setting free its alkalies--substances so important, nay, so indispensable to his crops. in the month of october the fields of yorkshire and oxfordshire look as it they were covered with snow. whole square miles are seen whitened over with quicklime, which during the moist winter months, exercises its beneficial influence upon the stiff, clayey soil, of those counties. according to the humus theory, quick-lime ought to exert the most noxious influence upon the soil, because all organic matters contained in it are destroyed by it, and rendered incapable of yielding their humus to a new vegetation. the facts are indeed directly contrary to this now abandoned theory: the fertility of the soil is increased by the lime. the cerealia require the alkalies and alkaline silicates, which the action of the lime renders fit for assimilation by the plants. if, in addition to these, there is any decaying organic matter present in the soil supplying carbonic acid, it may facilitate their development; but it is not essential to their growth. if we furnish the soil with ammonia, and the phosphates, which are indispensable to the cerealia, with the alkaline silicates, we have all the conditions necessary to ensure an abundant harvest. the atmosphere is an inexhaustible store of carbonic acid. a no less favourable influence than that of lime is exercised upon the soil of peaty land by the mere act of burning it: this greatly enhances its fertility. we have not long been acquainted with the remarkable change which the properties of clay undergo by burning. the observation was first made in the process of analysing the clay silicates. many of these, in their natural state, are not acted on by acids, but they become perfectly soluble if heated to redness before the application of the acid. this property belongs to potters' clay, pipe-clay, loam, and many different modifications of clay in soils. in their natural state they may be boiled in concentrated sulphuric acid, without sensible change; but if feebly burned, as is done with the pipe-clay in many alum manufactories, they dissolve in the acid with the greatest facility, the contained silica being separated like jelly in a soluble state. potters' clay belongs to the most sterile kinds of soil, and yet it contains within itself all the constituent elements essential to a most luxurious growth of plants; but their mere presence is insufficient to secure this end. the soil must be accessible to the atmosphere, to its oxygen, to its carbonic acid; these must penetrate it, in order to secure the conditions necessary to a happy and vigorous development of the roots. the elements present must be brought into that peculiar state of combination which will enable them to enter into plants. plastic clay is wanting in these properties; but they are imparted to it by a feeble calcination. at hardwicke court, near gloucester, i have seen a garden (mr. baker's) consisting of a stiff clay, which was perfectly sterile, become by mere burning extremely fertile. the operation was extended to a depth of three feet. this was an expensive process, certainly; but it was effectual. the great difference in the properties of burnt and unburnt clay is illustrated by what is seen in brick houses, built in moist situations. in the town of flanders, for instance, where most buildings are of brick, effloresences of salts cover the surfaces of the walls, like a white nap, within a few days after they are erected. if this saline incrustation is washed away by the rain, it soon re-appears; and this is even observed on walls which, like the gateway of lisle, have been erected for centuries. these saline incrustations consist of carbonates and sulphates, with alkaline bases; and it is well known these act an important part in vegetation. the influence of lime in their production is manifested by their appearing first at the place where the mortar and brick come into contact. it will now be obvious to you, that in a mixture of clay with lime, all the conditions exist for the solution of the silicated clay, and the solubility of the alkaline silicates. the lime gradually dissolving in water charged with carbonic acid, acts like milk of lime upon the clay. this explains also the favourable influence which marl (by which term all those varieties of clay rich in chalk are designated) exerts upon most kinds of soil. there are marly soils which surpass all others in fertility for all kinds of plants; but i believe marl in a burnt state must be far more effective, as well as other materials possessing a similar composition; as, for instance, those species of limestone which are adapted to the preparation of hydraulic cements,--for these carry to the soil not only the alkaline bases useful to plants, but also silica in a state capable of assimilation. the ashes of coals and lignite are also excellent means of ameliorating the soil, and they are used in many places for this purpose. the most suitable may be readily known by their property of forming a gelatinous mass when treated with acids, or by becoming, when mixed with cream of lime, like hydraulic cement,--solid and hard as stone. i have now, i trust, explained to your satisfaction, that the mechanical operations of agriculture--the application of lime and chalk to lands, and the burning of clay--depend upon one and the same scientific principle: they are means of accelerating the decomposition of the alkaline clay silicates, in order to provide plants, at the beginning of a new vegetation, with certain inorganic matters indispensable for their nutrition. letter xiv my dear sir, i treated, in my last letter, of the means of improving the condition of the soil for agricultural purposes by mechanical operations and mineral agents. i have now to speak of the uses and effects of animal exuviae, and vegetable matters or manures--properly so called. in order to understand the nature of these, and the peculiarity of their influence upon our fields, it is highly important to keep in mind the source whence they are derived. it is generally known, that if we deprive an animal of food, the weight of its body diminishes during every moment of its existence. if this abstinence is continued for some time, the diminution becomes apparent to the eye; all the fat of the body disappears, the muscles decrease in firmness and bulk, and, if the animal is allowed to die starved, scarcely anything but skin, tendon, and bones, remain. this emaciation which occurs in a body otherwise healthy, demonstrates to us, that during the life of an animal every part of its living substance is undergoing a perpetual change; all its component parts, assuming the form of lifeless compounds, are thrown off by the skin, lungs, and urinary system, altered more or less by the secretory organs. this change in the living body is intimately connected with the process of respiration; it is, in truth, occasioned by the oxygen of the atmosphere in breathing, which combines with all the various matters within the body. at every inspiration a quantity of oxygen passes into the blood in the lungs, and unites with its elements; but although the weight of the oxygen thus daily entering into the body amounts to or more ounces, yet the weight of the body is not thereby increased. exactly as much oxygen as is imbibed in inspiration passes off in expiration, in the form of carbonic acid and water; so that with every breath the amount of carbon and hydrogen in the body is diminished. but the emaciation--the loss of weight by starvation--does not simply depend upon the separation of the carbon and hydrogen; but all the other substances which are in combination with these elements in the living tissues pass off in the secretions. the nitrogen undergoes a change, and is thrown out of the system by the kidneys. their secretion, the urine, contains not only a compound rich in nitrogen, namely urea, but the sulphur of the tissues in the form of a sulphate, all the soluble salts of the blood and animal fluids, common salt, the phosphates, soda and potash. the carbon and hydrogen of the blood, of the muscular fibre, and of all the animal tissues which can undergo change, return into the atmosphere. the nitrogen, and all the soluble inorganic elements are carried to the earth in the urine. these changes take place in the healthy animal body during every moment of life; a waste and loss of substance proceeds continually; and if this loss is to be restored, and the original weight and substance repaired, an adequate supply of materials must be furnished, from whence the blood and wasted tissues may be regenerated. this supply is obtained from the food. in an adult person in a normal or healthy condition, no sensible increase or decrease of weight occurs from day to day. in youth the weight of the body increases, whilst in old age it decreases. there can be no doubt that in the adult, the food has exactly replaced the loss of substance: it has supplied just so much carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and other elements, as have passed through the skin, lungs, and urinary organs. in youth the supply is greater than the waste. part of the elements of the food remain to augment the bulk of the body. in old age the waste is greater than the supply, and the body diminishes. it is unquestionable, that, with the exception of a certain quantity of carbon and hydrogen, which are secreted through the skin and lungs, we obtain, in the solid and fluid excrements of man and animals, all the elements of their food. we obtain daily, in the form of urea, all the nitrogen taken in the food both of the young and the adult; and further, in the urine, the whole amount of the alkalies, soluble phosphates and sulphates, contained in all the various aliments. in the solid excrements are found all those substances taken in the food which have undergone no alteration in the digestive organs, all indigestible matters, such as woody fibre, the green colouring matter of leaves ( chlorophyle), wax, &c. physiology teaches us, that the process of nutrition in animals, that is, their increase of bulk, or the restoration of wasted parts, proceeds from the blood. the purpose of digestion and assimilation is to convert the food into blood. in the stomach and intestines, therefore, all those substances in the food capable of conversion into blood are separated from its other constituents; in other words, during the passage of the food through the intestinal canal there is a constant absorption of its nitrogen, since only azotised substances are capable of conversion into blood; and therefore the solid excrements are destitute of that element, except only a small portion, in the constitution of that secretion which is formed to facilitate their passage. with the solid excrements, the phosphates of lime and magnesia, which were contained in the food and not assimilated, are carried off, these salts being insoluble in water, and therefore not entering the urine. we may obtain a clear insight into the chemical constitution of the solid excrements without further investigation, by comparing the faeces of a dog with his food. we give that animal flesh and bones--substances rich in azotised matter--and we obtain, as the last product of its digestion, a perfectly white excrement, solid while moist, but becoming in dry air a powder. this is the phosphate of lime of the bones, with scarcely one per cent. of foreign organic matter. thus we see that in the solid and fluid excrements of man and animals, all the nitrogen--in short, all the constituent ingredients of the consumed food, soluble and insoluble, are returned; and as food is primarily derived from the fields, we possess in those excrements all the ingredients which we have taken from it in the form of seeds, roots, or herbs. one part of the crops employed for fattening sheep and cattle is consumed by man as animal food; another part is taken directly--as flour, potatoes, green vegetables, &c.; a third portion consists of vegetable refuse, and straw employed as litter. none of the materials of the soil need be lost. we can, it is obvious, get back all its constituent parts which have been withdrawn therefrom, as fruits, grain and animals, in the fluid and solid excrements of man, and the bones, blood and skins of the slaughtered animals. it depends upon ourselves to collect carefully all these scattered elements, and to restore the disturbed equilibrium of composition in the soil. we can calculate exactly how much and which of the component parts of the soil we export in a sheep or an ox, in a quarter of barley, wheat or potatoes, and we can discover, from the known composition of the excrements of man and animals, how much we have to supply to restore what is lost to our fields. if, however, we could procure from other sources the substances which give to the exuviae of man and animals their value in agriculture, we should not need the latter. it is quite indifferent for our purpose whether we supply the ammonia (the source of nitrogen) in the form of urine, or in that of a salt derived from coal-tar; whether we derive the phosphate of lime from bones, apatite, or fossil excrements (the coprolithes). the principal problem for agriculture is, how to replace those substances which have been taken from the soil, and which cannot be furnished by the atmosphere. if the manure supplies an imperfect compensation for this loss, the fertility of a field or of a country decreases; if, on the contrary, more are given to the fields, their fertility increases. an importation of urine, or of solid excrements, from a foreign country, is equivalent to an importation of grain and cattle. in a certain time, the elements of those substances assume the form of grain, or of fodder, then become flesh and bones, enter into the human body, and return again day by day to the form they originally possessed. the only real loss of elements we are unable to prevent is of the phosphates, and these, in accordance with the customs of all modern nations, are deposited in the grave. for the rest, every part of that enormous quantity of food which a man consumes during his lifetime ( say in sixty or seventy years), which was derived from the fields, can be obtained and returned to them. we know with absolute certainty, that in the blood of a young or growing animal there remains a certain quantity of phosphate of lime and of the alkaline phosphates, to be stored up and to minister to the growth of the bones and general bulk of the body, and that, with the exception of this very small quantity, we receive back, in the solid and fluid excrements, all the salts and alkaline bases, all the phosphate of lime and magnesia, and consequently all the inorganic elements which the animal consumes in its food. we can thus ascertain precisely the quantity, quality, and composition of animal excrements, without the trouble of analysing them. if we give a horse daily / pounds' weight of oats, and pounds of hay, and knowing that oats give per cent. and hay per cent. of ashes, we can calculate that the daily excrements of the horse will contain ounces of inorganic matter which was drawn from the fields. by analysis we can determine the exact relative amount of silica, of phosphates, and of alkalies, contained in the ashes of the oats and of the hay. you will now understand that the constituents of the solid parts of animal excrements, and therefore their qualities as manure, must vary with the nature of the creature's food. if we feed a cow upon beetroot, or potatoes, without hay, straw or grain, there will be no silica in her solid excrements, but there will be phosphate of lime and magnesia. her fluid excrements will contain carbonate of potash and soda, together with compounds of the same bases with inorganic acids. in one word, we have, in the fluid excrements, all the soluble parts of the ashes of the consumed food; and in the solid excrements, all those parts of the ashes which are insoluble in water. if the food, after burning, leaves behind ashes containing soluble alkaline phosphates, as is the case with bread, seeds of all kinds, and flesh, we obtain from the animal by which they are consumed a urine holding in solution these phosphates. if, however, the ashes of food contain no alkaline phosphates, but abound in insoluble earthy phosphates, as hay, carrots, and potatoes, the urine will be free from alkaline phosphates, but the earthy phosphates will be found in the faeces. the urine of man, of carnivorous and graminivorous animals, contains alkaline phosphates; that of herbivorous animals is free from these salts. the analysis of the excrements of man, of the piscivorous birds (as the guano), of the horse, and of cattle, furnishes us with the precise knowledge of the salts they contain, and demonstrates, that in those excrements, we return to the fields the ashes of the plants which have served as food,--the soluble and insoluble salts and earths indispensable to the development of cultivated plants, and which must be furnished to them by a fertile soil. there can be no doubt that, in supplying these excrements to the soil, we return to it those constituents which the crops have removed from it, and we renew its capability of nourishing new crops: in one word, we restore the disturbed equilibrium; and consequently, knowing that the elements of the food derived from the soil enter into the urine and solid excrements of the animals it nourishes, we can with the greatest facility determine the exact value of the different kinds of manure. thus the excrements of pigs which we have fed with peas and potatoes are principally suited for manuring crops of potatoes and peas. in feeding a cow upon hay and turnips, we obtain a manure containing the inorganic elements of grasses and turnips, and which is therefore preferable for manuring turnips. the excrement of pigeons contains the mineral elements of grain; that of rabbits, the elements of herbs and kitchen vegetables. the fluid and solid excrements of man, however, contain the mineral elements of grain and seeds in the greatest quantity. letter xv my dear sir, you are now acquainted with my opinions respecting the effects of the application of mineral agents to our cultivated fields, and also the rationale of the influence of the various kinds of manures; you will, therefore, now readily understand what i have to say of the sources whence the carbon and nitrogen, indispensable to the growth of plants, are derived. the growth of forests, and the produce of meadows, demonstrate that an inexhaustible quantity of carbon is furnished for vegetation by the carbonic acid of the atmosphere. we obtain from an equal surface of forest, or meadow-land, where the necessary mineral elements of the soil are present in a suitable state, and to which no carbonaceous matter whatever is furnished in manures, an amount of carbon, in the shape of wood and hay, quite equal, and oftimes more than is produced by our fields, in grain, roots, and straw, upon which abundance of manure has been heaped. it is perfectly obvious that the atmosphere must furnish to our cultivated fields as much carbonic acid, as it does to an equal surface of forest or meadow, and that the carbon of this carbonic acid is assimilated, or may be assimilated by the plants growing there, provided the conditions essential to its assimilation, and becoming a constituent element of vegetables, exist in the soil of these fields. in many tropical countries the produce of the land in grain or roots, during the whole year, depends upon one rain in the spring. if this rain is deficient in quantity, or altogether wanting, the expectation of an abundant harvest is diminished or destroyed. now it cannot be the water merely which produces this enlivening and fertilising effect observed, and which lasts for weeks and months. the plant receives, by means of this water, at the time of its first development, the alkalies, alkaline earths, and phosphates, necessary to its organization. if these elements, which are necessary previous to its assimilation of atmospheric nourishment, be absent, its growth is retarded. in fact, the development of a plant is in a direct ratio to the amount of the matters it takes up from the soil. if, therefore, a soil is deficient in these mineral constituents required by plants, they will not flourish even with an abundant supply of water. the produce of carbon on a meadow, or an equal surface of forest land, is independent of a supply of carbonaceous manure, but it depends upon the presence of certain elements of the soil which in themselves contain no carbon, together with the existence of conditions under which their assimilation by plants can be effected. we increase the produce of our cultivated fields, in carbon, by a supply of lime, ashes, and marl, substances which cannot furnish carbon to the plants, and yet it is indisputable,--being founded upon abundant experience,--that in these substances we furnish to the fields elements which greatly increase the bulk of their produce, and consequently the amount of carbon. if we admit these facts to be established, we can no longer doubt that a deficient produce of carbon, or in other words, the barrenness of a field does not depend upon carbonic acid, because we are able to increase the produce, to a certain degree, by a supply of substances which do not contain any carbon. the same source whence the meadow and the forest are furnished with carbon, is also open to our cultivated plants. the great object of agriculture, therefore, is to discover the means best adapted to enable these plants to assimilate the carbon of the atmosphere which exists in it as carbonic acid. in furnishing plants, therefore, with mineral elements, we give them the power to appropriate carbon from a source which is inexhaustible; whilst in the absence of these elements the most abundant supply of carbonic acid, or of decaying vegetable matter, would not increase the produce of a field. with an adequate and equal supply of these essential mineral constituents in the soil, the amount of carbonic acid absorbed by a plant from the atmosphere in a given time is limited by the quantity which is brought into contact with its organs of absorption. the withdrawal of carbonic acid from the atmosphere by the vegetable organism takes place chiefly through its leaves; this absorption requires the contact of the carbonic acid with their surface, or with the part of the plant by which it is absorbed. the quantity of carbonic acid absorbed in a given time is in direct proportion to the surface of the leaves and the amount of carbonic acid contained in the air; that is, two plants of the same kind and the same extent of surface of absorption, in equal times and under equal conditions, absorb one and the same amount of carbon. in an atmosphere containing a double proportion of carbonic acid, a plant absorbs, under the same condition, twice the quantity of carbon. boussingault observed, that the leaves of the vine, inclosed in a vessel, withdrew all the carbonic acid from a current of air which was passed through it, however great its velocity. (dumas lecon, p. .) if, therefore, we supply double the quantity of carbonic acid to one plant, the extent of the surface of which is only half that of another living in ordinary atmospheric air, the former will obtain and appropriate as much carbon as the latter. hence results the effects of humus, and all decaying organic substances, upon vegetation. if we suppose all the conditions for the absorption of carbonic acid present, a young plant will increase in mass, in a limited time, only in proportion to its absorbing surface; but if we create in the soil a new source of carbonic acid, by decaying vegetable substances, and the roots absorb in the same time three times as much carbonic acid from the soil as the leaves derive from the atmosphere, the plant will increase in weight fourfold. this fourfold increase extends to the leaves, buds, stalks, &c., and in the increased extent of the surface, the plant acquires an increased power of absorbing nourishment from the air, which continues in action far beyond the time when its derivation of carbonic acid through the roots ceases. humus, as a source of carbonic acid in cultivated lands, is not only useful as a means of increasing the quantity of carbon--an effect which in most cases may be very indifferent for agricultural purposes--but the mass of the plant having increased rapidly in a short time, space is obtained for the assimilation of the elements of the soil necessary for the formation of new leaves and branches. water evaporates incessantly from the surface of the young plant; its quantity is in direct proportion to the temperature and the extent of the surface. the numerous radical fibrillae replace, like so many pumps, the evaporated water; and so long as the soil is moist, or penetrated with water, the indispensable elements of the soil, dissolved in the water, are supplied to the plant. the water absorbed by the plant evaporating in an aeriform state leaves the saline and other mineral constituents within it. the relative proportion of these elements taken up by a plant, is greater, the more extensive the surface and more abundant the supply of water; where these are limited, the plant soon reaches its full growth, while if their supply is continued, a greater amount of elements necessary to enable it to appropriate atmospheric nourishment being obtained, its development proceeds much further. the quantity, or mass of seed produced, will correspond to the quantity of mineral constituents present in the plant. that plant, therefore, containing the most alkaline phosphates and earthy salts will produce more or a greater weight of seeds than another which, in an equal time has absorbed less of them. we consequently observe, in a hot summer, when a further supply of mineral ingredients from the soil ceases through want of water, that the height and strength of plants, as well as the development of their seeds, are in direct proportion to its absorption of the elementary parts of the soil in the preceding epochs of its growth. the fertility of the year depends in general upon the temperature, and the moisture or dryness of the spring, if all the conditions necessary to the assimilation of the atmospheric nourishment be secured to our cultivated plants. the action of humus, then, as we have explained it above, is chiefly of value in gaining time. in agriculture, this must ever be taken into account and in this respect humus is of importance in favouring the growth of vegetables, cabbages, &c. but the cerealia, and plants grown for their roots, meet on our fields, in the remains of the preceding crop, with a quantity of decaying vegetable substances corresponding to their contents of mineral nutriment from the soil, and consequently with a quantity of carbonic acid adequate to their accelerated development in the spring. a further supply of carbonic acid, therefore, would be quite useless, without a corresponding increase of mineral ingredients. from a morgen of good meadow land, , pounds weight of hay, according to the best agriculturists, are obtained on an average. this amount is furnished without any supply of organic substances, without manure containing carbon or nitrogen. by irrigation, and the application of ashes or gypsum, double that amount may be grown. but assuming , pounds weight of hay to be the maximum, we may calculate the amount of carbon and nitrogen derived from the atmosphere by the plants of meadows. according to elementary analysis, hay, dried at a temperature of deg reaumur, contains . per cent. of carbon, and / per cent. of nitrogen. per cent. of water retained by the hay, dried at common temperatures, is driven off at deg. , pounds weight of hay, therefore, corresponds to , pounds, dried at deg. this shows us, that pounds of carbon, and . pounds weight of nitrogen, have been obtained in the produce of one morgen of meadow land. supposing that this nitrogen has been absorbed by the plants in the form of ammonia, the atmosphere contains . pounds weight of ammonia to every pounds weight of carbonic acid (= carbon, or per cent.), or in other words, to every , pounds weight of carbonic acid, . pounds of ammonia, that is to about / , , the weight of the air, or / , of its volume. for every parts of carbonic acid absorbed by the surface of the leaves, the plant receives from the atmosphere somewhat more than one part of ammonia. with every , pounds of carbon, we obtain-- from a meadow . / pounds of nitrogen. from cultivated fields, in wheat . / " " oats . . " " rye . . " " potatoes . . " " beetroot . . " " clover . " " peas . " " boussingault obtained from his farm at bechelbronn, in alsace, in five years, in the shape of potatoes, wheat, clover, turnips, and oats, , of carbon, and . nitrogen. in the following five years, as beetroot, wheat, clover, turnips, oats, and rye, , of carbon, and . of nitrogen. in a further course of six years, potatoes, wheat, clover, turnips, peas, and rye, , of carbon, . of nitrogen. in years, , carbon, / nitrogen, which gives for every , carbon, . nitrogen. from these interesting and unquestionable facts, we may deduce some conclusions of the highest importance in their application to agriculture. . we observe that the relative proportions of carbon and nitrogen, stand in a fixed relation to the surface of the leaves. those plants, in which all the nitrogen may be said to be concentrated in the seeds, as the cerealia, contain on the whole less nitrogen than the leguminous plants, peas, and clover. . the produce of nitrogen on a meadow which receives no nitrogenised manure, is greater than that of a field of wheat which has been manured. . the produce of nitrogen in clover and peas, which agriculturists will acknowledge require no nitrogenised manure, is far greater than that of a potato or turnip field, which is abundantly supplied with such manures. lastly. and this is the most curious deduction to be derived from the above facts,--if we plant potatoes, wheat, turnips, peas, and clover, (plants containing potash, lime, and silex,) upon the same land, three times manured, we gain in years, for a given quantity of carbon, the same proportion of nitrogen which we receive from a meadow which has received no nitrogenised manure. on a morgen of meadow-land, we obtain in plants, containing silex, lime, and potash, carbon, . nitrogen. on a morgen of cultivated land, in an average of years, in plants containing the same mineral elements, silex, lime, and potash, carbon, . nitrogen. if we add the carbon and nitrogen of the leaves of the beetroot, and the stalk and leaves of the potatoes, which have not been taken into account, it still remains evident that the cultivated fields, notwithstanding the supply of carbonaceous and nitrogenised manures, produced no more carbon and nitrogen than an equal surface of meadow-land supplied only with mineral elements. what then is the rationale of the effect of manure,--of the solid and fluid excrements of animals? this question can now be satisfactorily answered: that effect is the restoration of the elementary constituents of the soil which have been gradually drawn from it in the shape of grain and cattle. if the land i am speaking of had not been manured during those years, not more than one-half, or perhaps than one-third part of the carbon and nitrogen would have been produced. we owe it to the animal excrements, that it equalled in production the meadow-land, and this, because they restored the mineral ingredients of the soil removed by the crops. all that the supply of manure accomplished, was to prevent the land from becoming poorer in these, than the meadow which produces , pounds of hay. we withdraw from the meadow in this hay as large an amount of mineral substances as we do in one harvest of grain, and we know that the fertility of the meadow is just as dependent upon the restoration of these ingredients to its soil, as the cultivated land is upon manures. two meadows of equal surface, containing unequal quantities of inorganic elements of nourishment,--other conditions being equal,--are very unequally fertile; that which possesses most, furnishes most hay. if we do not restore to a meadow the withdrawn elements, its fertility decreases. but its fertility remains unimpaired, with a due supply of animal excrements, fluid and solid, and it not only remains the same, but may be increased by a supply of mineral substances alone, such as remain after the combustion of ligneous plants and other vegetables; namely, ashes. ashes represent the whole nourishment which vegetables receive from the soil. by furnishing them in sufficient quantities to our meadows, we give to the plants growing on them the power of condensing and absorbing carbon and nitrogen by their surface. may not the effect of the solid and fluid excrements, which are the ashes of plants and grains, which have undergone combustion in the bodies of animals and of man, be dependent upon the same cause? should not the fertility, resulting from their application, be altogether independent of the ammonia they contain? would not their effect be precisely the same in promoting the fertility of cultivated plants, if we had evaporated the urine, and dried and burned the solid excrements? surely the cerealia and leguminous plants which we cultivate must derive their carbon and nitrogen from the same source whence the graminea and leguminous plants of the meadows obtain them! no doubt can be entertained of their capability to do so. in virginia, upon the lowest calculation, pounds weight of nitrogen were taken on the average, yearly, from every morgen of the wheat-fields. this would amount, in years, to , pounds weight. if this were derived from the soil, every morgen of it must have contained the equivalent of , pounds weight of animal excrements (assuming the latter, when dried, at the temperature of boiling water, to contain per cent.). in hungary, as i remarked in a former letter, tobacco and wheat have been grown upon the same field for centuries, without any supply of nitrogenised manure. is it possible that the nitrogen essential to, and entering into, the composition of these crops, could have been drawn from the soil? every year renews the foliage and fruits of our forests of beech, oak, and chesnuts; the leaves, the acorns, the chesnuts, are rich in nitrogen; so are cocoa-nuts, bread-fruit, and other tropical productions. this nitrogen is not supplied by man, can it indeed be derived from any other source than the atmosphere? in whatever form the nitrogen supplied to plants may be contained in the atmosphere, in whatever state it may be when absorbed, from the atmosphere it must have been derived. did not the fields of virginia receive their nitrogen from the same source as wild plants? is the supply of nitrogen in the excrements of animals quite a matter of indifference, or do we receive back from our fields a quantity of the elements of blood corresponding to this supply? the researches of boussingault have solved this problem in the most satisfactory manner. if, in his grand experiments, the manure which he gave to his fields was in the same state, i.e. dried at deg in a vacuum, as it was when analysed, these fields received, in years, , pounds of nitrogen. but we know that by drying all the nitrogen escapes which is contained in solid animal excrements, as volatile carbonate of ammonia. in this calculation the nitrogen of the urine, which by decomposition is converted into carbonate of ammonia, has not been included. if we suppose it amounted to half as much as that in the dried excrements, this would make the quantity of nitrogen supplied to the fields , pounds. in years, however, as we have seen, only , pounds of nitrogen, was contained in their produce of grain, straw, roots, et cetera--that is, far less than was supplied in the manure; and in the same period the same extent of surface of good meadow-land (one hectare = a hessian morgen), which received no nitrogen in manure, , pounds of nitrogen. it is well known that in egypt, from the deficiency of wood, the excrement of animals is dried, and forms the principal fuel, and that the nitrogen from the soot of this excrement was, for many centuries, imported into europe in the form of sal ammoniac, until a method of manufacturing this substance was discovered at the end of the last century by gravenhorst of brunswick. the fields in the delta of the nile are supplied with no other animal manures than the ashes of the burnt excrements, and yet they have been proverbially fertile from a period earlier than the first dawn of history, and that fertility continues to the present day as admirable as it was in the earliest times. these fields receive, every year, from the inundation of the nile, a new soil, in its mud deposited over their surface, rich in those mineral elements which have been withdrawn by the crops of the previous harvest. the mud of the nile contains as little nitrogen as the mud derived from the alps of switzerland, which fertilises our fields after the inundations of the rhine. if this fertilising mud owed this property to nitrogenised matters; what enormous beds of animal and vegetable exuviae and remains ought to exist in the mountains of africa, in heights extending beyond the limits of perpetual snow, where no bird, no animal finds food, from the absence of all vegetation! abundant evidence in support of the important truth we are discussing, may be derived from other well known facts. thus, the trade of holland in cheese may be adduced in proof and illustration thereof. we know that cheese is derived from the plants which serve as food for cows. the meadow-lands of holland derive the nitrogen of cheese from the same source as with us; i.e. the atmosphere. the milch cows of holland remain day and night on the grazing-grounds, and therefore, in their fluid and solid excrements return directly to the soil all the salts and earthy elements of their food: a very insignificant quantity only is exported in the cheese. the fertility of these meadows can, therefore, be as little impaired as our own fields, to which we restore all the elements of the soil, as manure, which have been withdrawn in the crops. the only difference is, in holland they remain on the field, whilst we collect them at home and carry them, from time to time, to the fields. the nitrogen of the fluid and solid excrements of cows, is derived from the meadow-plants, which receive it from the atmosphere; the nitrogen of the cheese also must be drawn from the same source. the meadows of holland have, in the lapse of centuries, produced millions of hundredweights of cheese. thousands of hundredweights are annually exported, and yet the productiveness of the meadows is in no way diminished, although they never receive more nitrogen than they originally contained. nothing then can be more certain than the fact, that an exportation of nitrogenised products does not exhaust the fertility of a country; inasmuch as it is not the soil, but the atmosphere, which furnishes its vegetation with nitrogen. it follows, consequently, that we cannot increase the fertility of our fields by a supply of nitrogenised manure, or by salts of ammonia, but rather that their produce increases or diminishes, in a direct ratio, with the supply of mineral elements capable of assimilation. the formation of the constituent elements of blood, that is, of the nitrogenised principles in our cultivated plants, depends upon the presence of inorganic matters in the soil, without which no nitrogen can be assimilated even when there is a most abundant supply. the ammonia contained in animal excrements exercises a favourable effect, inasmuch as it is accompanied by the other substances necessary to accomplish its transition into the elements of the blood. if we supply ammonia associated with all the conditions necessary to its assimilation, it ministers to the nourishment of the plants; but if this artificial supply is not given they can derive all the needed nitrogen from the atmosphere--a source, every loss from which is restored by the decomposition of the bodies of dead animals and the decay of plants. ammonia certainly favours, and accelerates, the growth of plants in all soils, wherein all the conditions of its assimilation are united; but it is altogether without effect, as respects the production of the elements of blood where any of these conditions are wanting. we can suppose that asparagin, the active constituent of asparagus, the mucilaginous root of the marsh-mallow, the nitrogenised and sulphurous ingredients of mustard-seed, and of all cruciferous plants, may originate without the aid of the mineral elements of the soil. but if the principles of those vegetables, which serve as food, could be generated without the co-operation of the mineral elements of blood, without potash, soda, phosphate of soda, phosphate of lime, they would be useless to us and to herbivorous animals as food; they would not fulfil the purpose for which the wisdom of the creator has destined them. in the absence of alkalies and the phosphates, no blood, no milk, no muscular fibre can be formed. without phosphate of lime our horses, sheep and cattle, would be without bones. in the urine and in the solid excrements of animals we carry ammonia, and, consequently, nitrogen, to our cultivated plants, and this nitrogen is accompanied by all the mineral elements of food exactly in the same proportions, in which both are contained in the plants which served as food to the animals, or what is the same, in those proportions in which both can serve as nourishment to a new generation of plants, to which both are essential. the effect of an artificial supply of ammonia, as a source of nitrogen, is, therefore, precisely analogous to that of humus as a source of carbonic acid--it is limited to a gain of time; that is, it accelerates the development of plants. this is of great importance, and should always be taken into account in gardening, especially in the treatment of the kitchen-garden; and as much as possible, in agriculture on a large scale, where the time occupied in the growth of the plants cultivated is of importance. when we have exactly ascertained the quantity of ashes left after the combustion of cultivated plants which have grown upon all varieties of soil, and have obtained correct analyses of these ashes, we shall learn with certainty which of the constituent elements of the plants are constant and which are changeable, and we shall arrive at an exact knowledge of the sum of all the ingredients we withdraw from the soil in the different crops. with this knowledge the farmer will be able to keep an exact record, of the produce of his fields in harvest, like the account-book of a well regulated manufactory; and then by a simple calculation he can determine precisely the substances he must supply to each field, and the quantity of these, in order to restore their fertility. he will be able to express, in pounds weight, how much of this or that element he must give in order to augment its fertility for any given kind of plants. these researches and experiments are the great desideratum of the present time. to the united efforts of the chemists of all countries we may confidently look for a solution of these great questions, and by the aid of enlightened agriculturists we shall arrive at a rational system of gardening, horticulture, and agriculture, applicable to every country and all kinds of soil, and which will be based upon the immutable foundation of observed facts and philosophical induction. letter xvi my dear sir, my recent researches into the constituent ingredients of our cultivated fields have led me to the conclusion that, of all the elements furnished to plants by the soil and ministering to their nourishment, the phosphate of lime--or, rather, the phosphates generally--must be regarded as the most important. in order to furnish you with a clear idea of the importance of the phosphates, it may be sufficient to remind you of the fact, that the blood of man and animals, besides common salt, always contains alkaline and earthy phosphates. if we burn blood and examine the ashes which remain, we find certain parts of them soluble in water, and others insoluble. the soluble parts are, common salt and alkaline phosphates; the insoluble consist of phosphate of lime, phosphate of magnesia, and oxide of iron. these mineral ingredients of the blood--without the presence of which in the food the formation of blood is impossible--both man and animals derive either immediately, or mediately through other animals, from vegetable substances used as food; they had been constituents of vegetables, they had been parts of the soil upon which the vegetable substances were developed. if we compare the amount of the phosphates in different vegetable substances with each other, we discover a great variety, whilst there is scarcely any ashes of plants altogether devoid of them, and those parts of plants which experience has taught us are the most nutritious, contain the largest proportion. to these belong all seeds and grain, especially the varieties of bread-corn, peas, beans, and lentils. it is a most curious fact that if we incinerate grain or its flour, peas, beans, and lentils, we obtain ashes, which are distinguished from the ashes of all other parts of vegetables by the absence of alkaline carbonates. the ashes of these seeds when recently prepared, do not effervesce with acids; their soluble ingredients consist solely of alkaline phosphates, the insoluble parts of phosphate of lime, phosphate of magnesia, and oxide of iron: consequently, of the very same salts which are contained in blood, and which are absolutely indispensable to its formation. we are thus brought to the further indisputable conclusion that no seed suitable to become food for man and animals can be formed in any plant without the presence and co-operation of the phosphates. a field in which phosphate of lime, or the alkaline phosphates, form no part of the soil, is totally incapable of producing grain, peas, or beans. an enormous quantity of these substances indispensable to the nourishment of plants, is annually withdrawn from the soil and carried into great towns, in the shape of flour, cattle, et cetera. it is certain that this incessant removal of the phosphates must tend to exhaust the land and diminish its capability of producing grain. the fields of great britain are in a state of progressive exhaustion from this cause, as is proved by the rapid extension of the cultivation of turnips and mangel wurzel--plants which contain the least amount of the phosphates, and therefore require the smallest quantity for their development. these roots contain to per cent. of water. their great bulk makes the amount of produce fallacious, as respects their adaptation to the food of animals, inasmuch as their contents of the ingredients of the blood, i.e. of substances which can be transformed into flesh, stands in a direct ratio to their amount of phosphates, without which neither blood nor flesh can be formed. our fields will become more and more deficient in these essential ingredients of food, in all localities where custom and habits do not admit the collection of the fluid and solid excrements of man, and their application to the purposes of agriculture. in a former letter i showed you how great a waste of phosphates is unavoidable in england, and referred to the well-known fact that the importation of bones restored in a most admirable manner the fertility of the fields exhausted from this cause. in the year the importation of bones for manure amounted to , tons, and huskisson estimated their value to be from l , to l , sterling. the importation is still greater at present, but it is far from being sufficient to supply the waste. another proof of the efficacy of the phosphates in restoring fertility to exhausted land is afforded by the use of the guano--a manure which, although of recent introduction into england, has found such general and extensive application. we believe that the importation of one hundred-weight of guano is equivalent to the importation of eight hundred-weight of wheat--the hundred-weight of guano assumes in a time which can be accurately estimated the form of a quantity of food corresponding to eight hundred-weight of wheat. the same estimate is applicable in the valuation of bones. if it were possible to restore to the soil of england and scotland the phosphates which during the last fifty years have been carried to the sea by the thames and the clyde, it would be equivalent to manuring with millions of hundred-weights of bones, and the produce of the land would increase one-third, or perhaps double itself, in five to ten years. we cannot doubt that the same result would follow if the price of the guano admitted the application of a quantity to the surface of the fields, containing as much of the phosphates as have been withdrawn from them in the same period. if a rich and cheap source of phosphate of lime and the alkaline phosphates were open to england, there can be no question that the importation of foreign corn might be altogether dispensed with after a short time. for these materials england is at present dependent upon foreign countries, and the high price of guano and of bones prevents their general application, and in sufficient quantity. every year the trade in these substances must decrease, or their price will rise as the demand for them increases. according to these premises, it cannot be disputed, that the annual expense of great britain for the importation of bones and guano is equivalent to a duty on corn: with this difference only, that the amount is paid to foreigners in money. to restore the disturbed equilibrium of constitution of the soil,--to fertilise her fields,--england requires an enormous supply of animal excrements, and it must, therefore, excite considerable interest to learn, that she possesses beneath her soil beds of fossil guano, strata of animal excrements, in a state which will probably allow of their being employed as a manure at a very small expense. the coprolithes discovered by dr. buckland, (a discovery of the highest interest to geology,) are these excrements; and it seems extremely probable that in these strata england possesses the means of supplying the place of recent bones, and therefore the principal conditions of improving agriculture--of restoring and exalting the fertility of her fields. in the autumn of , dr. buckland pointed out to me a bed of coprolithes in the neighbourhood of clifton, from half to one foot thick, inclosed in a limestone formation, extending as a brown stripe in the rocks, for miles along the banks of the severn. the limestone marl of lyme regis consists, for the most part, of one-fourth part of fossil excrements and bones. the same are abundant in the lias of bath, eastern and broadway hill, near evesham. dr. buckland mentions beds, several miles in extent, the substance of which consists, in many places, of a fourth part of coprolithes. pieces of the limestone rock in clifton, near bristol, which is rich in coprolithes and organic remains, fragments of bones, teeth, &c., were subjected to analysis, and were found to contain above per cent. of phosphate of lime. if this limestone is burned and brought in that state to the fields, it must be a perfect substitute for bones, the efficacy of which as a manure does not depend, as has been generally, but erroneously supposed, upon the nitrogenised matter which they contain, but on their phosphate of lime. the osseous breccia found in many parts of england deserves especial attention, as it is highly probable that in a short time it will become an important article of commerce. what a curious and interesting subject for contemplation! in the remains of an extinct animal world, england is to find the means of increasing her wealth in agricultural produce, as she has already found the great support of her manufacturing industry in fossil fuel,--the preserved matter of primeval forests,--the remains of a vegetable world. may this expectation be realised! and may her excellent population be thus redeemed from poverty and misery! note: project gutenberg also has an html version of this file which includes the original illustrations. see -h.htm or -h.zip: (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/ / -h/ -h.htm) or (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/ / -h.zip) heroes of science. chemists by m. m. pattison muir, m.a., f.r.s.e., fellow, and prælector in chemistry, of gonville and caius college, cambridge. published under the direction of the committee of general literature and education appointed by the society for promoting christian knowledge. london: society for promoting christian knowledge, northumberland avenue, charing cross; , queen victoria street, e.c.; , st. george's place, hyde park corner, s.w. brighton: , north street. new york: e. & j. b. young & co. . "the discoveries of great men never leave us; they are immortal; they contain those eternal truths which survive the shock of empires, outlive the struggles of rival creeds, and witness the decay of successive religions."--buckle. "he who studies nature has continually the exquisite pleasure of discerning or half discerning and divining laws; regularities glimmer through an appearance of confusion, analogies between phenomena of a different order suggest themselves and set the imagination in motion; the mind is haunted with the sense of a vast unity not yet discoverable or nameable. there is food for contemplation which never runs short; you gaze at an object which is always growing clearer, and yet always, in the very act of growing clearer, presenting new mysteries."--the author of "ecce homo." "je länger ich lebe, desto mehr verlern' ich das gelernte, nämlich die systeme."--jean paul richter. preface. i have endeavoured in this book to keep to the lines laid down for me by the publication committee of the society, viz. "to exhibit, by selected biographies, the progress of chemistry from the beginning of the inductive method until the present time." the progress of chemistry has been made the central theme; around this i have tried to group short accounts of the lives of those who have most assisted this progress by their labours. this method of treatment, if properly conducted, exhibits the advances made in science as intimately connected with the lives and characters of those who studied it, and also impresses on the reader the continuity of the progress of natural knowledge. the lives of a few chemists have been written; of others there are, however, only scanty notices to be found. the materials for this book have been collected chiefly from the following works:-- kopp's "geschichte der chemie." thomson's "history of chemistry." ladenburg's "entwickelungsgeschichte der chemie." wurtz's "history of the atomic theory." watts's "dictionary of chemistry." whewell's "history of the inductive sciences." rodwell's "birth of chemistry;" "inquiry into the hermetic mystery and alchemy" (london, ); "popular treatises on science written during the middle ages," edited for the historical society of science by thomas wright, m.a. (london, ); "ripley reviv'd; or, an exposition upon sir george ripley's hermetico-poetical works," by eirenæus philalethes (london, ); "tripus aureus, hoc est tres tractates chymici selectissimi" (frankfurt, ). "alchemy;" article in "encyclopædia britannica." boyle's "sceptical chymist." "biographie universelle;" for notices of berzelius and lavoisier. "english cyclopædia;" for notices of black, berzelius and lavoisier. black's "lectures," with memoir: edited by dr. robinson. priestley's "memoirs:" written partly by himself. priestley's works on "air," etc. lavoisier's "oeuvres." dalton's "life," by dr. henry; "life," by dr. r. angus smith; "new system of chemical philosophy." davy's "collected works;" with life, by his brother; "life," by dr. paris. berzelius's "lehrbuch," and various dissertations. wöhler's "jugenderinnerungen eines chemikers." graham's "collected memoirs." sketch of graham's life, in chemical society's journal. "life-work of liebig," by a. w. hofmann. "dumas," by a. w. hofmann. various dissertations by liebig and dumas in _annalen_, and elsewhere. my warmest thanks are due to my friend, mr. francis rye, for the great assistance he has given me in correcting the proof-sheets. m. m. pattison muir. cambridge, _april, _. contents. page introductory chapter i. alchemy: and the dawn of chemistry. beginnings of natural knowledge--chemistry in the middle ages--alchemy--the phlogistic theory chapter ii. establishment of chemistry as a science--period of black, priestley and lavoisier. introduction of accurate measurements into chemistry--black's researches on alkalis and on fixed air--his conception of heat--priestley's experiments on airs--his discovery of oxygen--lavoisier, the founder of the science of chemistry--he clearly establishes a connection between composition and properties of bodies chapter iii. establishment of general principles of chemical science--period of dalton. dalton's training in physical science--he revives and renders quantitative the atomic theory--the term "atom" is applied by him to elements and compounds alike--his rules for chemical synthesis chapter iv. establishment of general principles of chemical science (_continued_)--period of davy and berzelius. electro-chemistry--the dualistic theory developed by berzelius--davy's work on acids, alkalis, and salts--he proves chlorine to be an element--his discovery of the safety-lamp chapter v. the work of graham. graham traces the movements of molecules--he distinguishes between colloids and cystalloids--dialysis chapter vi. rise and progress of organic chemistry--period of liebig and dumas. the barrier between inorganic and organic chemistry begins to be broken down--wöhler prepares urea--dumas opposes the dualistic system of berzelius--liebig's conception of compound radicles--his work in animal and agricultural chemistry chapter vii. modern chemistry. the relations between composition and properties of bodies are developed and rendered more definite--physical methods are more largely made use of in chemistry--spectroscopic analysis chapter viii. summary and conclusion heroes of science. introductory. as we trace the development of any branch of natural knowledge we find that there has been a gradual progress from vague and fanciful to accurate and definite views of nature. we find that as man's conceptions of natural phenomena become more accurate they also for a time become more limited, but that this limitation is necessary in order that facts may be correctly classified, and so there may be laid the basis for generalizations which, being definite, shall also be capable of expansion. at first nature is strange; she is full of wonderful and fearful appearances. man is overwhelmed by the sudden and apparently irregular outbreaks of storms, by the capricious freaks of thunder and lightning, by the awful and unannounced devastations of the volcano or the earthquake; he believes himself to be surrounded by an invisible array of beings more powerful than himself, but, like himself, changeable in their moods and easily provoked to anger. after a time he begins to find that it is possible to trace points of connection between some of the appearances which had so overpowered or perplexed him. the huntsman observes that certain kinds of plants always grow where the game which he pursues is chiefly to be found; from the appearance of the sky at morning and evening the fisherman is able to tell whether there will follow weather suitable for him to set out in his fishing-boat; the tiller of the ground begins to feel sure that if he sow the seed in the well-dug soil and water it in proper seasons he will certainly reap the harvest in due time. and thus man comes to believe that natural events follow each other in a fixed order; there arises a conscious reference on his part of certain effects to certain definite causes. accurate knowledge has begun. as knowledge of natural appearances advances there comes a time when men devote themselves chiefly to a careful study of some one class of facts; they try to consider that part of nature with which they are mostly concerned as separate from all other parts of nature. thus the various branches of natural knowledge begin to have each a distinct existence. these branches get more and more subdivided, each division is more accurately studied, and so a great number of facts is accumulated in many classes. then we usually find that a master mind arises, who shows the connection which exists between the different parts of each division of natural knowledge, who takes a wide, far-reaching view of the whole range of the province of knowledge which he studies, and who, at the same time, is able to hold in his vision all the important details of each branch of which that province is composed. and thus we again get wide views of nature. but these are very different from the vague, dim and hesitating notions in which natural knowledge had its beginnings. in this later time men see that nature is both simple and complex; that she is more wonderful than their fathers dreamed, but that through all the complexity there runs a definite purpose; that the apparently separate facts are bound together by definite laws, and that to discover this purpose and these laws is possible for man. as we trace this progress in the various branches of natural knowledge we are struck with the fact that each important advance is generally accomplished by one or two leading men; we find that it becomes possible to group the history of each period round a few central figures; and we also learn that the character of the work done by each of these men of note is dependent on the nature and training of the individual man. it will be my endeavour in the following pages to give an account of the advance of chemical science, grouping the facts in each stage of progress round the figures of one or two men who were prominent in that period. for the purposes of this book it will be necessary that i should sketch only the most important periods in the story of chemical progress, and that in each of these i should fill in the prominent points alone. i shall therefore select three periods in the progress of this science, and try to give an account of the main work done in each of these. and the periods will be:-- i. the period wherein, chiefly by the work of black, priestley and lavoisier, the aim of chemical science was defined and the essential characters of the phenomena to be studied were clearly stated. ii. the period during which, chiefly by the labours of dalton, berzelius and davy, the great central propositions of the science were laid down and were developed into a definite theory. as belonging in great extent to this period, although chronologically later, i shall also consider the work of graham. iii. the period when, chiefly owing to advances made in organic chemistry, broader and more far-reaching systems of classification were introduced, and the propositions laid down in the preceding period were modified and strengthened. the workers in this period were very numerous; i shall chiefly consider these two--liebig and dumas. i shall conclude with a brief sketch of some of the important advances of chemical science in more recent times, and a summary of the characteristics of each of the three periods. chapter i. alchemy: and the dawn of chemistry. early chemistry was not a science. the ancient chemists dealt chiefly with what we should now call chemical manufactures; they made glass, cleaned leather, dyed cloth purple and other colours, extracted metals from their ores, and made alloys of metals. no well-founded explanations of these processes could be expected either from men who simply used the recipes of their predecessors, or from philosophers who studied natural science, not by the help of accurate experiments, but by the unaided light of their own minds. at somewhat later times chemistry assumed a very important place in the general schemes propounded by philosophers. change is vividly impressed on all man's surroundings: the endeavour to find some resting-place amidst the chaos of circumstances, some unchanging substance beneath the ever-changing appearances of things, has always held a prominent place with those who study the phenomena of the world which surrounds them. in the third and fourth centuries of our era much attention was given to the art which professed to explain the changes of nature. religion, philosophy, and what we should now call natural science, were at that time closely intermingled; the scheme of things which then, and for several centuries after that time, exerted a powerful influence over the minds of many thinkers was largely based on the conception of a fundamental unity underlying and regulating the observed dissimilarities of the universe. thus, in the _emerald table of hermes_, which was held in much repute in the middle ages, we read-- "true, without error, certain and most true: that which is above is as that which is below, and that which is below is as that which is above, for performing the miracles of the _one thing_; and as all things were from one, by the mediation of one, so all things arose from this one thing by adaptation: the father of it is the sun, the mother of it is the moon, the wind carried it in its belly, the nurse of it is the earth. this is the father of all perfection, the consummation of the whole world." and again, in a later writing we have laid down the basis of the art of alchemy in the proposition that "there abides in nature a certain pure matter, which, being discovered and brought by art to perfection, converts to itself proportionally all imperfect bodies that it touches." to discover this fundamental principle, this _one thing_, became the object of all research. earth and the heavens were supposed to be bound together by the all-pervading presence of the one thing; he who should attain to a knowledge of this precious essence would possess all wisdom. to the vision of those who pursued the quest for the one thing the whole universe was filled by one ever-working spirit, concealed now by this, now by that veil of sense, ever escaping identification in any concrete form, yet certainly capable of being apprehended by the diligent searcher. analogy was the chief guide in this search. if it were granted that all natural appearances were manifestations of the activity of one essential principle, then the vaguest and most far-fetched analogies between the phenomena of nature might, if properly followed up, lead to the apprehension of this hidden but everywhere present essence. the history of alchemy teaches, in the most striking manner, the dangers which beset this method of pursuing the study of nature; this history teaches us that analogies, unless founded on carefully and accurately determined facts, are generally utterly misleading in natural science. let us consider the nature of the experimental evidence which an alchemist of the fourth or fifth century could produce in favour of his statement that transmutation of one kind of matter into another is of constant occurrence in nature. the alchemist heated a quantity of water in an open glass vessel; the water slowly disappeared, and when it was all gone there remained in the vessel a small quantity of a white earthy solid substance. what could this experiment teach save that water was changed into earth and air? the alchemist then plunged a piece of red-hot iron into water placed under a bell-shaped glass vessel; some of the water seemed to be changed into air, and a candle, when brought into the bell, caused the air therein to take fire. therefore, concluded the experimenter, water is proved to be changeable into fire. a piece of lead was then strongly heated in the air; it lost its lustre and became changed into a reddish-white powder, very unlike lead in its properties; this powder was then heated in a convenient vessel with a little wheat, whereupon the lead was again produced. therefore, said the alchemist, lead is destroyed by fire, but it can be reproduced from its ashes by the help of heat and a few grains of corn. the experimenter would now proceed to heat a quantity of a mineral containing lead in an open vessel made of pulverized bones; the lead slowly disappeared, and at the close of the experiment a button of silver remained. might he not triumphantly assert that he had transmuted lead into silver? in order that the doctrine of the transmutation of metals might rest on yet surer evidence, the alchemist placed a piece of copper in spirits of nitre (nitric acid); the metal disappeared; into the green liquid thus produced he then placed a piece of iron; the copper again made its appearance, while the iron was removed. he might now well say that if lead was thus demonstrably changed into silver, and copper into iron, it was, to say the least, extremely probable that any metal might be changed into any other provided the proper means for producing the change could be discovered. but the experimental alchemist had a yet stranger transmutation wherewith to convince the most sceptical. he poured mercury in a fine stream on to melted sulphur; at once the mercury and the sulphur disappeared, and in their place was found a solid substance black as the raven's wing. he then heated this black substance in a closed vessel, when it also disappeared, and in its place there was found, deposited on the cooler part of the vessel, a brilliantly red-coloured solid. this experiment taught lessons alike to the alchemist, the philosopher, and the moralist of these times. the alchemist learned that to change one kind of matter into another was an easy task: the philosopher learned that the prevalence of change or transmutation is one of the laws of nature: and the moralist learned that evil is not wholly evil, but contains also some germs of good; for was not the raven-black substance emblematical of the evil, and the red-coloured matter of the good principle of things?[ ] on such experimental evidence as this the building of alchemy was reared. a close relationship was believed to prevail through the whole phenomena of nature. what more natural then than to regard the changes which occur among the forms of matter on this earth as intimately connected with the changes which occur among the heavenly bodies? man has ever been overawed by the majesty of the stars; yet he has not failed to notice that the movements of these bodies are apparently capricious. the moon has always been to him a type of mutability; only in the sun has he seemed to find a settled resting-point. now, when we remember that in the alchemical scheme of things the material earth and material heavens, the intellectual, the moral, and the spiritual world were regarded as one great whole, the parts of which were continuously acting and reacting on each other, we cannot wonder that the alchemist should regard special phenomena which he observed in his laboratory, or special forms of matter which he examined, as being more directly than other phenomena or other forms of matter, under the influence of the heavenly bodies. this connection became gradually more apparent to the student of alchemy, until at last it was fixed in the language and the symbols which he employed. thus the sun (sol) was represented by a circle, which likewise became the symbol for gold, as being the most perfect metal. the moon (luna) was ever changing; she was represented by a half-circle, which also symbolized the pale metal silver. copper and iron were regarded as belonging to the same class of metals as gold, but their less perfect nature was denoted by the sign + or ^. tin and lead belonged to the lunar class, but like copper they were supposed to be imperfect metals. mercury was at once solar and lunar in its properties. these suppositions were summed up in such alchemical symbols as are represented below-- [illustration: sol. gold.] [illustration: luna. silver.] [illustration: venus. copper.] [illustration: mars. iron.] [illustration: jupiter. tin.] [illustration: saturn. lead.] [illustration: mercury. quicksilver.] many of the alchemical names remain to the present time; thus in pharmacy the name "lunar caustic" is applied to silver nitrate, and the symptoms indicative of lead-poisoning are grouped together under the designation of "saturnine cholic." but as the times advanced the older and nobler conception of alchemy became degraded. if it be true, the later alchemists urged, that all things suffer change, but that a changeless essence or principle underlies all changing things, and that the presence of more or less of this essence confers on each form of matter its special properties, it follows that he who can possess himself of this principle will be able to transmute any metal into any other; he will be able to change any metal into gold. now, as the possession of gold has always carried with it the means of living luxuriously, it is easy to understand how, when this practical aspect of alchemy had taken firm root in men's minds, the pursuit of the art became for all, except a few lofty and noble spirits, synonymous with the pursuit of wealth. so that we shall not, i think, much err if we describe the chemistry of the later middle ages as an effort to accumulate facts on which might be founded the art of making gold. in one respect this was an advance. in the early days of alchemy there had been too much trusting to the mental powers for the manufacture of natural facts: chemists now actually worked in laboratories; and very hard did many of these alchemists work. paracelsus says of the alchemists, "they are not given to idleness, nor go in a proud habit, or plush and velvet garments, often showing their rings upon their fingers, or wearing swords with silver hilts by their sides, or fine and gay gloves upon their hands; but diligently follow their labours, sweating whole days and nights by their furnaces. they do not spend their time abroad for recreation, but take delight in their laboratory. they put their fingers amongst coals, into clay and filth, not into gold rings. they are sooty and black like smiths and miners, and do not pride themselves upon clean and beautiful faces." by thus "taking delight in their laboratories" the later alchemists gathered together many facts; but their work centred round one idea, viz. that metals might all be changed into gold, and this idea was the result rather of intellectual guessing than of reasoning on established facts of nature. one of the most famous alchemists of the middle ages was born at einsiedeln, in switzerland, in . his name, when paraphrased into greek, became paracelsus. this man, some of whose remarks have just been quoted, acquired great fame as a medical practitioner, and also as a lecturer on medicine: he travelled throughout the greater part of europe, and is supposed to have been taught the use of several new medicines by the arabian physicians whom he met in spain. with an over-weening sense of his own powers, with an ardent and intemperate disposition, revolting against all authority in medicine or science, paracelsus yet did a good work in calling men to the study of nature as the only means whereby natural science could be advanced. "alchemy has but one aim and object," paracelsus taught: "to extract the quintessence of things, and to prepare arcana and elixirs which may serve to restore to man the health and soundness he has lost." he taught that the visible universe is but an outer shell or covering, that there is a spirit ever at work underneath this veil of phenomena; but that all is not active: "to separate the active function (the spirit) of this outside shell from the passive" was, he said, the proper province of alchemy. paracelsus strongly insisted on the importance of the changes which occur when a substance burns, and in doing this he prepared the way for stahl and the phlogistic chemists. however we may admire the general conceptions underlying the work of the earlier alchemists, we must admit that the method of study which they adopted could lead to very few results of lasting value; and i think we may add that, however humble the speculations of these older thinkers might appear, this humility was for the most part only apparent. these men were encompassed (as we are) by unexplained appearances: they were every moment reminded that man is not "the measure of all things;" and by not peering too anxiously into the mysteries around them, by drawing vague conclusions from partially examined appearances, they seemed at once to admit their own powerlessness and the greatness of nature. but i think we shall find, as we proceed with our story, that this is not the true kind of reverence, and that he is the really humble student of nature who refuses to overlook any fact, however small, because he feels the tremendous significance of every part of the world of wonders which it is his business and his happiness to explore. as examples of the kind of explanation given by alchemists of those aspects of nature which they professed to study, i give two quotations from translations of the writings of basil valentine and paracelsus, who flourished in the first half of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries respectively. "think most diligently about this; often bear in mind, observe and comprehend that all minerals and metals together, in the same time, and after the same fashion, and of one and the same principal matter, are produced and generated. that matter is no other than a mere vapour, which is extracted from the elementary earth by the superior stars, or by a sidereal distillation of the macrocosm; which sidereal hot infusion, with an airy sulphureous property, descending upon inferiors, so acts and operates as that there is implanted, spiritually and invisibly, a certain power and virtue in those metals and minerals; which fume, moreover, resolves in the earth into a certain water wherefrom all metals are thenceforth generated and ripened to their perfection, and thence proceeds this or that metal or mineral, according as one of the three principles acquires dominion and they have much or little of sulphur and salt, or an unequal mixture of these; whence some metals are fixed, that is, constant or stable; and some are volatile and easily changeable, as is seen in gold, silver, copper, iron, tin and lead." "the life of metals is a secret fatness; of salts, the spirit of aqua fortis; of pearls, their splendour; of marcasites and antimony, a tingeing metalline spirit; of arsenics, a mineral and coagulated poison. the life of all men is nothing else but an astral balsam, a balsamic impression, and a celestial invisible fire, an included air, and a tingeing spirit of salt. i cannot name it more plainly, although it is set out by many names." when the alchemists gave directions for making the stone which was to turn all it touched into gold, they couched them in such strange and symbolical language as this: "after our serpent has been bound by her chain, penetrated with the blood of our green dragon, and driven nine or ten times through the combustible fire into the elementary air, if you do not find her to be exceeding furious and extremely penetrating, it is a sign that you do not hit our subject, the notion of the homogenea, or their proportion; if this furious serpent does not come over in a cloud and turn into our virgin milk, or argentine water, not corrosive at all and yet insensibly and invisibly devouring everything that comes near it, it is plainly to be seen that you err in the notion of our universal menstruum." or, again, what could any reasonable man make of this? "in the green lion's bed the sun and moon are born; they are married and beget a king. the king feeds on the lion's blood, which is the king's father and mother, who are at the same time his brother and sister. i fear i betray the secret, which i promised my master to conceal in dark speech from any one who knows not how to rule the philosopher's fire." concerning the same lion, another learned author says that "though called a lion, it is not an animal substance, but for its transcendant force, and the rawness of its origin, it is called the green lion." but he adds in a moment of confidence: "this horrid beast has so many names, that unless god direct the searcher it is impossible to distinguish him." and once more. "take our two serpents, which are to be found everywhere on the face of the earth: tie them in a love-knot and shut them up in the arabian _caraha_. this is the first labour; but the next is more difficult. thou must encamp against them with the fire of nature, and be sure thou dost bring thy line round about. circle them in and stop all avenues that they find no relief. continue this siege patiently, and they turn into an ugly venomous black toad, which will be transformed to a horrible devouring dragon, creeping and weltering in the bottom of her cave without wings. touch her not by any means, for there is not on earth such a vehement transcending poison. as thou hast begun so proceed, and this dragon will turn into a swan. henceforth i will show thee how to fortify thy fire till the phoenix appear: it is a red bird of a most deep colour, with a shining fiery hue. feed this bird with the fire of his father and the ether of his mother: for the first is meat and the second is drink, and without this last he attains not to his full glory. be sure to understand this secret," etc., etc. the alchemists spoke of twelve gates through which he who would attain to the palace of true art must pass: these twelve gates were to be unlocked by twelve keys, descriptions of which, couched in strange and symbolical language, were given in alchemical treatises. thus in "ripley reviv'd"[ ] we read that canon ripley, of bridlington, who lived in the time of edward iv., sang thus of the first gate, which was "calcination:"-- "the battle's fought, the conquest won, the lyon dead reviv'd; the eagle's dead which did him slay, and both of sense depriv'd. the showers cease, the dews which fell for six weeks do not rise; the ugly toad that did so swell with swelling bursts and dies." and of the third gate, or "conjunction," we find the canon saying-- "he was a king, yet dead as dead could be; his sister a queen, who when her brother she did breathless see, the like was never seen, she cryes until her eyes with over-weeping were waxed dim-- so long till her tears reach'd up to her ears: the queen sunk, but the king did swim." in some books these gates and keys are symbolically represented in drawings, _e.g._ in a pamphlet by paracelsus, called "tripus aureus, hoc est tres tractates chymici selectissimi." (frankfurt, .) it is evident that a method of studying nature which resulted in such dim and hazy explanations as these was eminently fitted to produce many who pretended to possess secrets by the use of which they could bring about startling results beyond the power of ordinary men; and, at the same time, the almost universal acceptance of such statements as those i have quoted implied the existence in men generally of a wondrous readiness to believe anything and everything. granted that a man by "sweating whole days and nights by his furnaces" can acquire knowledge which gives him great power over his fellows, it necessarily follows that many will be found ready to undergo these days and nights of toil. and when we find that this supposed knowledge is hidden under a mask of strange and mystical signs and language, we may confidently assert that there will be many who learn to repeat these strange terms and use these mystical signs without attempting to penetrate to the truths which lie behind--without, indeed, believing that the mystical machinery which they use has any real meaning at all. we find, as a matter of fact, that the age of the alchemists produced many deceivers, who, by mumbling incantations and performing a few tricks, which any common conjuror would now despise, were able to make crowds of men believe that they possessed a supernatural power to control natural actions, and, under this belief, to make them part with their money and their substance. one respectable physician of the hague, who entertained a peripatetic alchemist, complains that the man entered his "best-furnished room without wiping his shoes, although they were full of snow and dirt." however, the physician was rewarded, as the stranger gave him, "out of his philosophical commiseration, as much as a turnip seed in size" of the much-wished-for stone of wisdom. that the alchemist of popular belief was a man who used a jargon of strange and high-sounding words, that he might the better deceive those whom he pretended to help, is evident from the literature of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. in the play of the "alchymist" ben jonson draws the character of subtle as that of a complete scoundrel, whose aim is to get money from the pockets of those who are stupid enough to trust him, and who never hesitates to use the basest means for this end. from the speeches of subtle we may learn the kind of jargon employed by the men who pretended that they could cure diseases and change all baser metals into gold. "_subtle._ name the vexations and the martyrizations of metals in the work. _face._ sir, putrefaction, solution, ablution, sublimation, cohobation, calcination, ceration, and fixation. _sub._ and when comes vivification? _face._ after mortification. _sub._ what's cohobation? _face._ 'tis the pouring on your aqua regis, and then drawing him off, to the trine circle of the seven spheres. * * * * * _sub._ and what's your mercury? _face._ a very fugitive; he will be gone, sir. _sub._ how know you him? _pace._ by his viscosity, his oleosity, and his suscitability." even in the fourteenth century, chaucer (in the "canon's yeoman's tale") depicts the alchemist as a mere cunning knave. a priest is prevailed on to give the alchemist money, and is told that he will be shown the change of base metal into gold. the alchemist busies himself with preparations, and sends the priest to fetch coals. "and whil he besy was, this feendly wrecche, this false chanoun (the foule feende him fecche) out of his bosom took a bechen cole in which ful subtilly was maad an hole, and therein put was of silver lymayle an unce, and stopped was withoute fayle the hole with wex, to keep the lymayle in. and understondith, that this false gyn was not maad there, but it was maad before." this "false gyn" having been put in the crucible and burned with the rest of the ingredients, duly let out its "silver lymayle" (filings), which appeared in the shape of a small button of silver, and so accomplished the "false chanoun's" end of deceiving his victim. the alchemists accumulated many facts: they gained not a little knowledge concerning the appearances of nature, but they were dominated by a single idea. living in the midst of an extremely complex order of things, surrounded by a strange and apparently capricious succession of phenomena, they were convinced that the human intelligence, directed and aided by the teachings of the church, would guide them through the labyrinth. and so they entered on the study of nature with preconceived notions and foregone conclusions: enthusiastic and determined to know although many of them were, they nevertheless failed because they refused to tread the only path which leads to true advances in natural science--the path of unprejudiced accurate experiment, and of careful reasoning on experimentally determined facts. and even when they had become convinced that their aims were visionary, they could not break free from the vicious system which bound them. "... i am broken and trained to my old habits: they are part of me. i know, and none so well, my darling ends are proved impossible: no less, no less, even now what humours me, fond fool, as when their faint ghosts sit with me and flatter me, and send me back content to my dull round."[ ] one of the most commonly occurring and most noticeable changes in the properties of matter is that which proceeds when a piece of wood, or a candle, or a quantity of oil burns. the solid wood, or candle, or the liquid oil slowly disappears, and this disappearance is attended with the visible formation of flame. even the heavy fixed metals, tin or lead, may be caused to burn; light is produced, a part of the metal seems to disappear, and a white (or reddish) solid, very different from the original metal, remains. the process of burning presents all those peculiarities which are fitted to strike an observer of the changes of nature; that is, which are fitted to strike a chemist--for chemistry has always been recognized as having for its object to explain the changes which matter undergoes. the chemists of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were chiefly occupied in trying to explain this process of burning or combustion. van helmont ( - ), who was a physician and chemist of brussels, clearly distinguished between common air and other "airs" or gases produced in different ways. robert hooke ( - ), one of the original fellows of the royal society, in the "micographia, or philosophical description of minute bodies," published in , concluded from the results of numerous experiments that there exists in common air a peculiar kind of gas, similar to, or perhaps identical with the gas or air which is got by heating saltpetre; and he further supposed that when a solid burns, it is dissolved by (or we should now say, it is converted into a gas by combining with) this peculiar constituent of the air. john mayow ( - ), a physician of oxford, experimented on the basis of facts established by hooke. he showed that when a substance, _e.g._ a candle, burns in air, the volume of air is thereby lessened. to that portion of the air which had _dissolved_ the burned substance he gave the name of _nitre-air_, and he argued that this air exists in condensed form in nitre, because sulphur burns when heated with nitre in absence of common air. mayow added the most important fact--a fact which was forgotten by many later experimenters--that the solid substance obtained by burning a metal in air weighs more than the metal itself did before burning. he explained this increase in weight by saying that the burning metal absorbs particles of "nitre-air" from the atmosphere. thus hooke and mayow had really established the fact that common air consists of more than one definite kind of matter--in other words, that common air is not an element; but until recent times the term "element" or "elementary principle" was used without any definite meaning. when we say that the ancients and the alchemists recognized four elements--earth, air, fire, and water--we do not attach to the word "element" the same definite meaning as when we now say, "iron is an element." from earth, air, fire and water other substances were obtained; or it might be possible to resolve other substances into one or more of these four. but even to such a word as "substance" or "matter" no very definite meaning could be attached. although, therefore, the facts set forth by hooke and mayow might now justify the assertion that air is not an element, they did not, in the year , necessarily convey this meaning to men's minds. the distinction between element and compound was much more clearly laid down by the hon. robert boyle ( - ), whose chemical work was wonderfully accurate and thorough, and whose writings are characterized by acute scientific reasoning. we shall again return to these terms "element" and "compound." but the visible and striking phenomenon in most processes of burning is the production of light and sometimes of flame. the importance of the fact that the burned substance (when a solid) weighs more than the unburned substance was overshadowed by the apparent importance of the outward part of the process, which could scarcely be passed over by any observer. there appears to be an outrush of _something_ from the burning substance. there _is_ an outrush of something, said becher and stahl, and this something is the "principle of fire." the principle of fire, they said, is of a very subtle nature; its particles, which are always in very rapid motion, can penetrate any substance, however dense. when metals burn--the argument continued--they lose this principle of fire; when the burned metal--or _calx_ as it was usually called--is heated with charcoal it regains this "principle," and so the metal is re-formed from the calx. thus arose the famous theory of _phlogiston_ (from greek, = "burned"), which served as a central nucleus round which all chemical facts were grouped for nearly a hundred years. john joachim becher was born at speyer in , and died in ; in his chemical works, the most important of which is the "physica subterranea," he retained the alchemical notion that the metals are composed of three "principles"--the nitrifiable, the combustible, and the mercurial--and taught that during calcination the combustible and mercurial principles are expelled, while the nitrifiable remains in the calx. george ernest stahl--born at anspach in , and died at berlin in --had regard chiefly to the principles which escape during the calcination of metals, and simplifying, and at the same rendering more definite the idea of becher, he conceived and enunciated the theory of phlogiston. but if _something_ (name it "phlogiston" or call it by any other name you please) is lost by a metal when the metal is burned, how is it that the loss of this thing is attended with an increase in the weight of the matter which loses it? either the theory of phlogiston must be abandoned, or the properties of the _thing_ called phlogiston must be very different from those of any known kind of matter. stahl replied, phlogiston is a "principle of levity;" the presence of phlogiston in a substance causes that substance to weigh less than it did before it received this phlogiston. in criticizing this strange statement, we must remember that in the middle of the seventeenth century philosophers in general were not firmly convinced of the truth that the essential character of matter is that it possesses weight, nor of the truth that it is impossible to destroy or to create any quantity of matter however small. it was not until the experimental work of lavoisier became generally known that chemists were convinced of these truths. nevertheless, the opponents of the stahlian doctrine were justified in asking for further explanations--in demanding that some other facts analogous to this supposed fact, viz. that a substance can weigh less than nothing, should be experimentally established. the phlogistic theory however maintained its ground; we shall find that it had a distinct element of truth in it, but we shall also find that it did harm to scientific advance. this theory was a wide and sweeping generalization from a few facts; it certainly gave a central idea around which some facts might be grouped, and it was not very difficult, by slightly cutting down here and slightly adding there, to bring many new discoveries within the general theory. we now know that in order to explain the process of combustion much more accurate knowledge was required than the chemists of the seventeenth century possessed; but we ought to be thankful to these chemists, and notably to stahl, that they did not hesitate to found a generalization on the knowledge they had. almost everything propounded in natural science has been modified as man's knowledge of nature has become wider and more accurate; but it is because the scientific student of nature uses the generalizations of to-day as stepping-stones to the better theories of to-morrow, that science grows "from more to more." looking at the state of chemistry about the middle of the eighteenth century, we find that the experiments, and especially the measurements, of hooke and mayow had laid a firm basis of fact concerning the process of combustion, but that the phlogistic theory, which appeared to contradict these facts, was supreme; that the existence of airs, or gases, different from common air was established, but that the properties of these airs were very slightly and very inaccurately known; that boyle had distinguished element from compound and had given definite meanings to these terms, but that nevertheless the older and vaguer expression, "elementary principle," was generally used; and lastly, that very few measurements of the masses of the different kinds of matter taking part in chemical changes had yet been made. footnotes: [ ] i have borrowed these illustrations of the alchemical, experimental method from m. hoefer's "histoire de la chimie," quoted in the "encyclopædia brittanica," art. "alchemy." [ ] "ripley reviv'd: or an exposition upon sir george ripley's hermetico-poetical works," by eirenæus philalethes. london, . [ ] browning's "paracelsus." chapter ii. establishment of chemistry as a science--period of black, priestley and lavoisier. _joseph black_, - . _joseph, priestley_, - . _antoine laurent lavoisier_, - . during this period of advance, which may be broadly stated as comprising the last half of the eighteenth century, the aim and scope of chemical science were clearly indicated by the labours of black, priestley and lavoisier. the work of these men dealt chiefly with the process of combustion. black and priestley finally proved the existence of airs or gases different from common air, and lavoisier applied these discoveries to give a clear explanation of what happens when a substance burns. * * * * * joseph black was born near bordeaux in the year . his father was of scottish family, but a native of belfast; his mother was the daughter of mr. gordon, of hilhead in aberdeenshire. we are told by dr. robison, in his preface to black's lectures, that john black, the father of joseph, was a man "of most amiable manners, candid and liberal in his sentiments, and of no common information." at the age of twelve black was sent home to a school at belfast; after spending six years there he went to the university of glasgow in the year . little is known of his progress at school or at the university, but judging from his father's letters, which his son preserved, he seems to have devoted himself to study. while at glasgow he was attracted to the pursuit of physical science, and chose medicine as a profession. becoming a pupil of dr. cullen, he was much impressed with the importance of chemical knowledge to the student of medicine. dr. cullen appears to have been one of the first to take large and philosophical views of the scope of chemical science, and to attempt to raise chemistry from the rank of a useful art to that of a branch of natural philosophy. such a man must have been attracted by the young student, whose work was already at once accurate in detail and wide in general scope. in the notes of work kept by black at this time are displayed those qualities of methodical arrangement, perseverance and thoroughness which are so prominent in his published investigations and lectures. in one place we find, says his biographer, many disjointed facts and records of diverse observations, but the next time he refers to the same subjects we generally have analogous facts noted and some conclusions drawn--we have the beginnings of knowledge. having once entered on an investigation black works it out steadily until he gets definite results. his earlier notes are concerned chiefly with heat and cold; about he begins to make references to the subject of "fixed air." about black went to edinburgh university to complete his medical studies, and here he was again fortunate in finding a really scientific student occupying the chair of natural philosophy. the attention of medical men was directed at this time to the action of limewater as a remedy for stone in the bladder. all the medicines which were of any avail in mitigating the pain attendant on this disease more or less resembled the "caustic ley of the soap-boilers" (or as we should now call it caustic potash or soda). these caustic medicines were mostly prepared by the action of quicklime on some other substance, and quicklime was generally supposed to derive its caustic, or corrosive properties from the fire which was used in changing ordinary limestone into quicklime. when quicklime was heated with "fixed alkalis" (_i.e._ with potassium or sodium carbonate), it changed these substances into caustic bodies which had a corrosive action on animal matter; hence it was concluded that the quicklime had derived a "power"--or some said had derived "igneous matter"--from the fire, and had communicated this to the fixed alkalis, which thereby acquired the property of corroding animal matter. black thought that he might be able to lay hold of this "igneous matter" supposed to be taken by the limestone from the fire; but he found that limestone loses weight when changed into quicklime. he then dissolved limestone (or chalk) in spirits of salt (hydrochloric acid), and compared the loss of weight undergone by the chalk in this process with the loss suffered by an equal quantity of chalk when strongly heated. this investigation led black to a fuller study of the action of heat on chalk and on "mild magnesia" (or as we now say, magnesium carbonate). in order that his experiments might be complete and his conclusions well established, he delayed taking the degree of doctor of medicine for three years. he graduated as m. d. in , and presented his thesis on "magnesia alba, quicklime and other alkaline substances," which contained the results of what is probably the first accurately quantitative examination of a chemical action which we possess. black prepared mild magnesia (magnesium carbonate) by boiling together solutions of epsom salts (magnesium sulphate) and fixed alkali (potassium carbonate). he showed that when mild magnesia is heated-- . it is much decreased in bulk. . it loses weight (twelve parts become five, according to black). . it does not precipitate lime from solutions of that substance in acids (black had already shown that mild magnesia does precipitate lime). he then strongly heated a weighed quantity of mild magnesia in a retort connected with a receiver; a few drops of water were obtained in the receiver, but the magnesia lost six or seven times as much weight as the weight of the water produced. black then recalls the experiments of hales, wherein airs other than common air had been prepared, and concludes that the loss of weight noticed when mild magnesia is calcined is probably due to expulsion, by the heat, of some kind of air. dissolving some of his mild magnesia in acid he noticed that effervescence occurred, and from this he concluded that the same air which, according to his hypothesis, is expelled by heat, is also driven out from the mild magnesia by the action of acid. he then proceeded to test this hypothesis. one hundred and twenty grains of mild magnesia were strongly calcined; the calcined matter, amounting to seventy grains, was dissolved in dilute oil of vitriol, and this solution was mixed with common fixed alkali (potassium carbonate). the solid which was thus produced was collected, washed and weighed; it amounted to a trifle less than one hundred and twenty grains, and possessed all the properties--detailed by black--of the original mild magnesia. but this is exactly the result which ought to have occurred according to his hypothesis. the next step in the investigation was to collect the peculiar air which black had proved to be evolved during the calcination of mild magnesia. to this substance he gave the name of "fixed air," because it was fixed or held by magnesia. black established the existence of this air in the expired breath of animals, and also showed that it was present in the air evolved during vinous fermentation. he demonstrated several of its properties; among these, the fact that animals die when placed in this air. an air with similar properties was obtained by calcining chalk. black held that the chemical changes which occur when chalk is calcined are exactly analogous to those which he had proved to take place when magnesia is strongly heated. chalk ought therefore to lose weight when calcined; the residue ought to neutralize an acid without evolution of any gas, and the quantity of acid thus neutralized ought to be the same as would be neutralized by the uncalcined chalk; lastly, it ought to be possible to recover the uncalcined chalk by adding a fixed alkali to a solution of the calcined chalk or quicklime. the actual results which black obtained were as follows:-- one hundred and twenty grains of chalk were dissolved in dilute muriatic (hydrochloric) acid; grains of the acid were needed to neutralize the chalk, and grains of fixed air were evolved. one hundred and twenty grains of the same specimen of chalk were strongly calcined, and then dissolved in dilute muriatic acid; grains of the acid were required to neutralize the calcined chalk. the difference between and is very slight; considering the state of practical chemistry at black's time, we may well agree with him that he was justified in the conclusion that equal weights of calcined and of uncalcined chalk neutralize the same amount of acid. one hundred and twenty grains of the same specimen of chalk were again strongly heated; the calcined chalk, amounting to grains, was digested with a solution of fixed alkali in water. the substance thus obtained, when washed and dried, weighed grains, and had all the properties of ordinary chalk. therefore, said black, it is possible to recover the whole of the chalk originally present before calcination, by adding a fixed alkali to the calcined chalk or quicklime. at this time it was known that water dissolves quicklime, but it was generally held that only about one-fourth (or perhaps a little more) of any specimen of quicklime could be dissolved by water, however much water was employed. black's researches had led him to regard quicklime as a homogeneous chemical compound; he concluded that as water undoubtedly dissolves quicklime to some extent, any specimen of this substance, provided it be pure, must be wholly soluble in water. carefully conducted experiments proved that black's conclusion was correct. black had thus proved that quicklime is a definite substance, with certain fixed properties which characterize it and mark it off from all other substances; that by absorbing, or combining with another definite substance (fixed air), quicklime is changed into a third substance, namely chalk, which is also characterized by properties as definite and marked as those of quicklime or fixed air. black, quite as much as the alchemists, recognized the fact that change is continually proceeding in nature; but he clearly established the all-important conclusion that these natural changes proceed in definite order, and that it is possible by careful experiment and just reasoning to acquire a knowledge of this order. he began the great work of showing that, as in other branches of natural science, so also in chemistry, which is pre-eminently the study of the changes of nature, "the only distinct meaning of that word" (natural) "is _stated_, _fixed_, or _settled_" (butler's "analogy," published ). this research by black is a model of what scientific work ought to be. he begins with a few observations of some natural phenomenon; these he supplements by careful experiments, and thus establishes a sure basis of fact; he then builds on this basis a general hypothesis, which he proceeds to test by deducing from it certain necessary conclusions, and proving, or disproving, these by an appeal to nature. this is the scientific method; it is common sense made accurate. very shortly after the publication of the thesis on magnesia and quicklime, a vacancy occurred in the chemical chair in glasgow university, and black was appointed professor of anatomy and lecturer on chemistry. as he did not feel fully qualified to lecture on anatomy, he made an arrangement to exchange subjects with the professor of medicine, and from this time he delivered lectures on chemistry and on "the institutes of medicine." black devoted a great deal of care and time to the teaching duties of his chair. his chemical experimental researches were not much advanced after this time; but he delivered courses of lectures in which new light was thrown on the whole range of chemical science. in the years between and black examined the phenomena of heat and cold, and gave an explanation, founded on accurate experiments, of the thermal changes which accompany the melting of solids and the vaporization of liquids. if pieces of wood, lead and ice be taken by the hand from a box in which they have been kept cold, the wood feels cold to the touch, the lead feels colder than the wood, and the ice feels colder than the lead; hence it was concluded that the hand receives cold from the wood, more cold from the lead, and most cold from the ice. black however showed that the wood really takes away heat from the hand, but that as the wood soon gets warmed, the process stops before long; that the lead, not being so quickly warmed as the wood, takes away more heat from the hand than the wood does, and that the ice takes away more heat than either wood or lead. black thought that the heat which is taken by melting ice from a warm body remains in the water which is produced; as soon as winter came he proceeded to test this supposition by comparing the times required to melt one pound of ice and to raise the temperature of one pound of water through one degree, the source of heat being the same in each case. he also compared the time required to lower the temperature of one pound of water through one degree with that required to freeze one pound of ice-cold water. he found that in order to melt one pound of ice without raising its temperature, as much heat had to be added to the ice as sufficed to raise the temperature of one pound of water through about degrees of fahrenheit's thermometer. but this heat which has been added to the ice to convert it into water is not indicated by the thermometer. black called this "_latent heat_." the experimental data and the complete theory of latent heat were contained in a paper read by black to a private society which met in the university of glasgow, on april , ; but it appears that black was accustomed to teach the theory in his ordinary lectures before this date. the theory of latent heat ought also to explain the phenomena noticed when liquid water is changed into steam. black applied his theory generally to this change, but did not fully work out the details and actually measure the quantity of heat which is absorbed by water at the boiling point before it is wholly converted into steam at the same temperature, until some years later when he had the assistance of his pupil and friend james watt. taking a survey of the phenomena of nature, black insisted on the importance of these experimentally established facts--that before ice melts it must absorb a large quantity of heat, and before water is vaporized it must absorb another large quantity of heat, which amounts of heat are restored to surrounding substances when water vapour again becomes liquid water and when liquid water is congealed to ice. he allows his imagination to picture the effects of these properties of water in modifying and ameliorating the climates of tropical and of northern countries. in his lectures he says, "here we can also trace another magnificent train of changes which are nicely accommodated to the wants of the inhabitants of this globe. in the equatorial regions, the oppressive heat of the sun is prevented from a destructive accumulation by copious evaporation. the waters, stored with their vaporific heat, are then carried aloft into the atmosphere till the rarest of the vapour reaches the very cold regions of the air, which immediately forms a small portion of it into a fleecy cloud. this also further tempers the scorching heat by its opacity, performing the acceptable office of a screen. from thence the clouds are carried to the inland countries, to form the sources in the mountains which are to supply the numberless streams that water the fields. and by the steady operation of causes, which are tolerably uniform, the greater part of the vapours passes on to the circumpolar regions, there to descend in rains and dews; and by this beneficent conversion into rain by the cold of those regions, each particle of steam gives up the heat which was latent in it. this is immediately diffused, and softens the rigour of those less comfortable climates." in the year black was appointed professor of chemistry in the university of edinburgh, in which position he remained till his death in . during these thirty-three years he devoted himself chiefly to teaching and to encouraging the advance of chemical science. he was especially careful in the preparation of his elementary lectures, being persuaded that it was of the utmost importance that his pupils should be well grounded in the principles of chemistry. his health had never been robust, and as he grew old he was obliged to use great care in his diet; his simple and methodical character and habits made it easy for him to live on the plainest food, and to take meals and exercise at stated times and in fixed quantities. black's life closed, as was fitting, in a quiet and honoured old age. he had many friends, but lived pretty much alone--he was never married. on the th of november , "being at table with his usual fare, some bread, a few prunes and a measured quantity of milk diluted with water, and having the cup in his hand when the last stroke of his pulse was to be given, he had set it down on his knees, which were joined together, and kept it steady with his hand, in the manner of a person perfectly at ease; and in this attitude he expired, without spilling a drop, and without a writhe in his countenance, as if an experiment had been required to show to his friends the facility with which he departed." black was characterized by "moderation and sobriety of thought;" he had a great sense of the fitness of things--of what is called by the older writers "propriety." but he was by no means a dull companion; he enjoyed general society, and was able to bear a part in any kind of conversation. a thorough student of nature, he none the less did not wish to devote his whole time to laboratory work or to the labours of study; indeed he seems to have preferred the society of well-cultivated men and women to that of specialists in his own or other branches of natural science. but with his true scientific peers he doubtless appeared at his best. among his more intimate friends were the famous political economist adam smith, and the no less celebrated philosopher david hume. dr. hutton, one of the earliest workers in geology, was a particular friend of black; his friendship with james watt began when watt was a student in his class, and continued during his life. with such men as his friends, and engaged in the study of nature--that boundless subject which one can never know to the full, but which one can always know a little more year by year--black's life could not but be happy. his example and his teaching animated his students; he was what a university professor ought to be, a student among students, but yet a teacher among pupils. his work gained for him a place in the first rank of men of science; his clearness of mind, his moderation, his gentleness, his readiness to accept the views of others provided these views were well established on a basis of experimentally determined facts, fitted him to be the centre of a circle of scientific students who looked on him as at once their teacher and their friend. as a lecturer black was eminently successful. he endeavoured to make all his lectures plain and intelligible; he enlivened them by many experiments designed simply to illustrate the special point which he had in view. he abhorred ostentatious display and trickiness in a teacher. black was strongly opposed to the use of hypotheses in science. dr. robison (the editor of his lectures) tells that when a student in edinburgh he met black, who became interested in him from hearing him speak somewhat enthusiastically in favour of one of the lecturers in the university. black impressed on him the necessity of steady experimental work in natural science, gave him a copy of newton's "optics" as a model after which scientific work ought to be conducted, and advised him "to reject, even without examination, any hypothetical explanation, as a mere waste of time and ingenuity." but, when we examine black's own work, we see that by "hypothetical explanations" he meant vague guesses. he himself made free use of scientific (_i.e._ of exact) hypotheses; indeed the history of science tells us that without hypotheses advance is impossible. black taught by his own researches that science is not an array of facts, but that the object of the student of nature is to explain facts. but the method generally in vogue before the time of black was to gather together a few facts, or what seemed to be facts, and on these to raise a vast superstructure of "vain imaginings." naturalists had scarcely yet learned that nature is very complex, and that guessing and reasoning on guesses, with here and there an observation added, was not the method by which progress was to be made in learning the lessons written in this complex book of nature. in place of this loose and slipshod method black insisted that the student must endeavour to form a clear mental image of every phenomenon which he studied. such an image could be obtained only by beginning with detailed observation and experiment. from a number of definite mental images the student must put together a picture of the whole natural phenomenon under examination; perceiving that something was wanted here, or that the picture was overcrowded there, he must again go to nature and gain fresh facts, or sometimes prove that what had been accepted as facts had no real existence, and so at length he would arrive at a true representation of the whole process. so anxious was black to define clearly what he knew and professed to teach, that he preferred to call his lectures "on the effects of heat and mixtures," rather than to announce them as "a systematic course on chemistry." his introductory lecture on "heat in general" is very admirable; the following quotation will serve to show the clearness of his style and the methodical but yet eminently suggestive manner of his teaching:-- _"of heat in general._ "that this extensive subject may be treated in a profitable manner, i propose-- "first. to ascertain what i mean by the word _heat_ in these lectures. "secondly. to explain the meaning of the term _cold_, and ascertain the real difference between heat and cold. "thirdly. to mention some of the attempts which have been made to discover the nature of heat, or to form an idea of what may be the immediate cause of it. "fourthly and lastly. i shall begin to describe sensible effects produced by heat on the bodies to which it is communicated. "any person who reflects on the ideas which we annex to the word _heat_ will perceive that this word is used for two meanings, or to express two different things. it either means a sensation excited in our organs, or a certain quality, affection, or condition of the bodies around us, by which they excite in us that sensation. the word is used in the first sense when we say, we feel heat; in the second, when we say, there is heat in the fire or in a hot stone. there cannot be a sensation of heat in the fire, or in the hot stone, but the matter of the fire, or of the stone, is in a state or condition by which it excites in us the sensation of heat. "now, in beginning to treat of heat and its effects, i propose to use the word in this second sense only; or as expressing that state, condition, or quality of matter by which it excites in us the sensation of heat. this idea of heat will be modified a little and extended as we proceed, but the meaning of the word will continue at bottom the same, and the reason of the modification will be easily perceived." black's manner of dealing with the phenomenon of combustion illustrates the clearness of the conceptions which he formed of natural phenomena, and shows moreover the thoroughly unbiased nature of his mind. as soon as he had convinced himself that the balance of evidence was in favour of the new (antiphlogistic) theory, he gave up those doctrines in which he had been trained, and accepted the teaching of the french chemists; but he did not--as some with less well-balanced minds might do--regard the new theory as a final statement, but rather as one stage nearer the complete explanation which future experiments and future reasoning would serve to establish. in his lectures on combustion black first of all establishes the facts, that when a body is burned it is changed into a kind (or kinds) of matter which is no longer inflammable; that the presence of air is needed for combustion to proceed; that the substance must be heated "to a certain degree" before combustion or inflammation begins; that this degree of heat (or we should now say this degree of temperature) differs for each combustible substance; that the supply of air must be renewed if the burning is to continue; and that the process of burning produces a change in the quality of the air supplied to the burning body. he then states the phlogistic interpretation of these phenomena: that combustion is caused by the outrush from the burning body of a something called the _principle of fire_, or _phlogiston_. black then proceeds to demonstrate certain other facts:--when the substances produced by burning phosphorus or sulphur are heated with carbon (charcoal) the original phosphorus or sulphur is reproduced. this reproduction is due, according to the phlogistic chemists, to the giving back, by carbon, of the phlogiston which had escaped during the burning. hence carbon contains much phlogiston. but as a similar reproduction of phosphorus or sulphur, from the substances obtained by burning these bodies, can be accomplished by the use of substances other than carbon, it is evident that these other substances also contain much phlogiston, and, moreover, that the phlogiston contained in all these substances is one and the same _principle_. what then, he asks, is this "principle" which can so escape, and be so restored by the action of various substances? he then proceeds as follows:-- "but when we inquire further, and endeavour to learn what notion was formed of the nature of this principle, and what qualities it was supposed to have in its separate state, we find this part of the subject very obscure and unsatisfactory, and the opinions very unsettled. "the elder chemists, and the alchemists, considered sulphur as the universal inflammable principle, or at least they chose to call the inflammable part of all bodies, that are more or less inflammable, by the name of their sulphur.... the famous german chemist becher was, i believe, the first who rejected the notion of sulphur being the principle of inflammability in bodies.... his notion of the nature of the pure principle of inflammability was afterwards more fully explained and supported by professor stahl, who, agreeably to the doctrine of becher, represented the principle of inflammability as a dry substance, or of an earthy nature, the particles of which were exquisitely subtile, and were much disposed to be agitated and set in motion with inconceivable velocity.... the opinion of becher and stahl concerning this _terra secunda_, or _terra inflammabilis_, or _phlogiston_, was that the atoms of it are, more than all others, disposed to be affected with an excessively swift whirling motion (_motus vorticillaris_). the particles of other elementary substances are likewise liable to be affected with the same sort of motion, but not so liable as those of _terra secunda_; and when the particles of any body are agitated with this sort of motion, the body exhibits the phenomena of heat, or ignition, or inflammation according to the violence and rapidity of the motion.... becher and stahl, therefore, did not suppose that heat depended on the abundance of a peculiar matter, such as the matter of heat or fire is now supposed to be, but on a peculiar motion of the particles of matter.... "this very crude opinion of the earthy nature of the principle of inflammability appears to have been deduced from a quality of many of the inflammable substances, by which they resist the action of water as a solvent. the greater number of the earthy substances are little, or not at all, soluble in water.... and when becher and stahl found those compounds, which they supposed contained phlogiston in the largest quantity, to be insoluble in water, although the other matter, with which the phlogiston was supposed to be united, was, in its separate state, exceedingly soluble in that fluid, they concluded that _a dry nature, or an incapability to be combined with water_, was an eminent quality of their phlogiston; and this was what they meant by calling it an earth or earthy substance.... but these authors supposed, at the same time, that the particles of this dry and earthy phlogiston were much disposed to be excessively agitated with a whirling motion; which whirling motion, exerted in all directions from the bodies in which phlogiston is contained, produced the phenomena of inflammation. this appears to have been the notion formed by becher and stahl, concerning the nature of the principle of inflammability, or the phlogiston; a notion which seems the least entitled to the name of explanation of anything we can think of. i presume that few persons can form any clear conception of this whirling motion, or, if they can, are able to explain to themselves how it produces, or can produce, anything like the phenomena of heat or fire." black then gives a clear account of the experiments of priestley and lavoisier (see pp. , , and - ), which established the presence, in common air, of a peculiar kind of gas which is especially concerned in the processes of combustion; he emphasizes the fact that a substance increases in weight when it is burned; and he gives a simple and clear statement of that explanation of combustion which is now accepted by all, and which does not require that the existence of any principle of fire should be assumed. it is important to note that black clearly connects the _physical_ fact that heat is absorbed, or evolved, by a substance during combustion, with the _chemical_ changes which are brought about in the properties of the substance burned. he concludes with an admirable contrast between the phlogistic theory and the theory of lavoisier, which shows how wide, and at the same time how definite, his conceptions were. black never speaks contemptuously of a theory which he opposes. "according to this theory" (_i.e._ the theory of lavoisier), "the inflammable bodies, sulphur for example, or phosphorus, are simple substances. the acid into which they are changed by inflammation is a compound. the chemists, on the contrary" (_i.e._ the followers of stahl), "consider the inflammable bodies as compounds, and the uninflammable matter as more simple. in the common theory the heat and light are supposed to emanate from, or to be furnished by, the burning body. but, in mr. lavoisier's theory, both are held to be furnished by the air, of which they are held to be constituent parts, or ingredients, while in its state of fire-supporting air." black was not a brilliant discoverer, but an eminently sound and at the same time imaginative worker; whatever he did he did well, but he did not exhaust any field of inquiry. many of the facts established by him have served as the basis of important work done by those who came after him. the number of new facts added by black to the data of chemistry was not large; but by his lectures--which are original dissertations of the highest value--he did splendid service in advancing the science of chemistry. black possessed that which has generally distinguished great men of science, a marked honesty of character; and to this he added comprehensiveness of mental vision: he saw beyond the limits of the facts which formed the foundations of chemical science in his day. he was not a fact-collector, but a philosopher. * * * * * joseph priestley, the son of jonas priestley, "a maker and dresser of woollen cloth," was born at fieldhead, near leeds, in the year . his mother, who was the daughter of a farmer near wakefield, died when he was seven years old. from that time he was brought up by a sister of his father, who was possessed of considerable private means. priestley's surroundings in his young days were decidedly religious, and evidently gave a tone to his whole after life. we shall find that priestley's work as a man of science can scarcely be separated from his theological and metaphysical work. his cast of mind was decidedly metaphysical; he was altogether different from black, who, as we have seen, was a typical student of natural phenomena. the house of priestley's aunt was a resort for all the dissenting ministers of that part of the county. she herself was strictly calvinistic in her theological views, but not wholly illiberal. priestley's early schooling was chiefly devoted to learning languages; he acquired a fair knowledge of latin, a little greek, and somewhat later he learned the elements of hebrew. at one time he thought of going into trade, and therefore, as he tells us in his "memoirs," he acquired some knowledge of french, italian and high dutch. with the help of a friend, a dissenting minister, he learned something of geometry, mathematics and natural philosophy, and also got some smattering of the chaldee and syriac tongues. at the age of nineteen priestley went to an "academy" at daventry. the intellectual atmosphere here seems to have been suitable to the rapid development of priestley's mind. great freedom of discussion was allowed; even during the teachers' lectures the students were permitted "to ask whatever questions and to make whatever remarks" they pleased; and they did it, priestley says, "with the greatest, but without any offensive, freedom." the students were required to read and to give an account of the more important arguments for and against the questions discussed in the teachers' lectures. theological disputations appear to have been the favourite topics on which the students exercised their ingenuity among themselves. priestley tells us that he "saw reason to embrace what is generally called the heterodox side of almost every question." leaving this academy, priestley went, in , as assistant to the dissenting minister at needham, in suffolk. here he remained for three years, living on a salary of about £ a year, and getting more and more into bad odour because of his peculiar theological views. from needham he moved to nantwich, in cheshire, where he was more comfortable, and, having plenty of work to do, he had little time for abstruse speculations. school work engaged most of his time at nantwich; he also began to collect a few scientific instruments, such as an electrical machine and an air-pump. these he taught his scholars to use and to keep in good order. he gave lectures on natural phenomena, and encouraged his scholars to make experiments and sometimes to exhibit their experiments before their parents and friends. he thus extended the reputation of his school and implanted in his scholars a love of natural knowledge. in the year priestley removed to warrington, to act as tutor in a newly established academy, where he taught languages--a somewhat wide subject, as it included lectures on "the theory of languages," on "oratory and criticism," and on "the history, laws, and constitution of england." he says, "it was my province to teach elocution, and also logic and hebrew. the first of these i retained, but after a year or two i exchanged the two last articles with dr. aikin for the civil law, and one year i gave a course of lectures on anatomy." during his stay at warrington, which lasted until , priestley married a daughter of mr. isaac wilkinson, an ironmaster of wrexham, in wales. he describes his wife as "a woman of an excellent understanding much improved by reading, of great fortitude and strength of mind, and of a temper in the highest degree affectionate and generous, feeling strongly for others and little for herself, also greatly excelling in everything relating to household affairs." about this time priestley met dr. franklin more than once in london. his conversation seems to have incited priestley to a further study of natural philosophy. he began to examine electrical phenomena, and this led to his writing and publishing a "history of electricity," in the course of which he found it necessary to make new experiments. the publication of the results of these experiments brought him more into notice among scientific men, and led to his election as a fellow of the royal society, and to his obtaining the degree of ll.d. from the university of edinburgh. in the year priestley removed to leeds, where he spent six years as minister of millhill chapel. he was able to give freer expression to his theological views in leeds than could be done in smaller places, such as needham and nantwich. during this time he wrote and published many theological and metaphysical treatises. but, what is of more importance to us, he happened to live near a brewery. now, the accidental circumstances, as we call them, of priestley's life were frequently of the greatest importance in their effects on his scientific work. black had established the existence and leading properties of fixed air about twelve or thirteen years before the time when priestley came to live near the brewery in leeds. he had shown that this fixed air is produced during alcoholic fermentation. priestley knowing this used to collect the fixed air which came off from the vats in the neighbouring brewery, and amuse himself with observing its properties. but removing from this part of the town his supplies of fixed air were stopped. as however he had become interested in working with airs, he began to make fixed air for himself from chalk, and in order to collect this air he devised a very simple piece of apparatus which has played a most important part in the later development of the chemistry of gases, or pneumatic chemistry. priestley's _pneumatic trough_ is at this day to be found in every laboratory; it is extremely simple and extremely perfect. a dish of glass, or earthenware, or wood is partly filled with water; a shelf runs across the dish at a little distance beneath the surface of the water; a wide-mouthed bottle is filled with water and placed, mouth downwards, over a hole in this shelf. the gas which is to be collected in this bottle is generated in a suitable vessel, from which a piece of glass or metal tubing passes under the shelf and stops just where the hole is made. the gas which comes from the apparatus bubbles up into the bottle, drives out the water, and fills the bottle. when the bottle is full of gas, it is moved to one side along the shelf, and another bottle filled with water is put in its place. as the mouth of each bottle is under water there is no connection between the gas inside and the air outside the bottle; the gas may therefore be kept in the bottle until the experimenter wants it. (see fig. . which is reduced from the cut in priestley's "air.") [illustration: fig. .] priestley tells us that at this time he knew very little chemistry, but he thinks that this was a good thing, else he might not have been led to make so many new discoveries as he did afterwards make. experimenting with fixed air, he found that water could be caused to dissolve some of the gas. in he published a pamphlet on the method of impregnating water with fixed air; this solution of fixed air in water was employed medicinally, and from this time we date the manufacture of artificial mineral waters. the next six years of priestley's life ( - ) are very important in the history of chemistry; it was during these years that much of his best work on various airs was performed. during this time he lived as a kind of literary companion (nominally as librarian) with the earl of shelburne (afterwards marquis of lansdowne.) his wife and family--he had now three children--lived at calne, in wiltshire, near lord shelburne's seat of bowood. priestley spent most of the summer months with his family, and the greater part of each winter with lord shelburne at his london residence; during this time he also travelled in holland and germany, and visited paris in . in a paper published in november , priestley says that he examined a specimen of air which he had extracted from saltpetre above a year before this date. this air "had by some means or other become noxious, but," he supposed, "had been restored to its former wholesome state, so as to effervesce with nitrous air" (in modern language, to combine with nitric oxide) "and to admit a candle to burn in it, in consequence of agitation with water." he tells us, in his "observations on air" ( ), that at this time he was altogether in the dark as to the nature of this air obtained from saltpetre. in august , he was amusing himself by observing the action of heat on various substances--"without any particular view," he says, "except that of extracting air from a variety of substances by means of a burning lens in quicksilver, which was then a new process with me, and which i was very proud of"--when he obtained from _red precipitate_ (oxide of mercury) an air in which a candle burned with a "remarkably vigorous flame." the production of this peculiar air "surprised me more than i can well express;" "i was utterly at a loss how to account for it." at first he thought that the specimen of _red precipitate_ from which the air had been obtained was not a proper preparation, but getting fresh specimens of this salt, he found that they all yielded the same kind of air. having satisfied himself by experiment that this peculiar air had "all the properties of common air, only in much greater perfection," he gave to it the name of _dephlogisticated air_. later experiments taught him that the same air might be obtained from red lead, from manganese oxide, etc., by the action of heat, and from various other salts by the action of acids. priestley evidently regards the new "dephlogisticated air" simply as very pure ordinary air; indeed, he seems to look on all airs, or gases, as easily changeable one into the other. he always interprets his experimental results by the help of the theory of phlogiston. one would indeed think from priestley's papers that the existence of this substance phlogiston was an unquestioned and unquestionable fact. thus, he says in the preface to his "experiments on air:" "if any opinion in all the modern doctrine concerning air be well founded, it is certainly this, that nitrous air is highly charged with phlogiston, and that from this quality only it renders pure air noxious.... if i have completely ascertained anything at all relating to air it is this." priestley thought that "very pure air" would take away phlogiston from some metals without the help of heat or any acid, and thus cause these metals to rust. he therefore placed some clean iron nails in _dephlogisticated air_ standing over mercury; after three months he noticed that about one-tenth of the air in the vessel had disappeared, and he concluded, although no rust appeared, that the dephlogisticated air had as a fact withdrawn phlogiston from the iron nails. this is the kind of reasoning which black described to his pupils as "mere waste of time and ingenuity." the experiment with the nails was made in ; at this time, therefore, priestley had no conception as to what his _dephlogisticated air_ really was. trying a great many experiments, and finding that the new air was obtained by the action of acids on earthy substances, priestley was inclined to regard this air, and if this then all other airs, as made up of an acid (or acids) and an earthy substance. we now know how completely erroneous this conclusion was, but we must remember that in priestley's time chemical substances were generally regarded as of no very definite or fixed composition; that almost any substance, it was supposed, might be changed into almost any other; that no clear meaning was attached to the word "element;" and that few, if any, careful measurements of the quantities of different kinds of matter taking part in chemical actions had yet been made. but at the same time we cannot forget that the books of hooke and mayow had been published years before this time, and that twenty years before priestley began his work on airs, black had published his exact, scientific investigation on fixed air. although we may agree with priestley that, had he made himself acquainted with what others had done before he began his own experiments, he might not have made so many new discoveries as he did, yet one cannot but think that his discoveries, although fewer, would have been more accurate. we are told by priestley that, when he was in paris in , he exhibited the method of obtaining dephlogisticated air from _red precipitate_ to lavoisier and other french chemists. we shall see hereafter what important results to science followed from this visit to lavoisier. let us shortly review priestley's answer to the question, "what happens when a substance burns in air?" beginning to make chemical experiments when he had no knowledge of chemistry, and being an extremely rapid worker and thinker, he naturally adopted the prevalent theory, and as naturally interpreted the facts which he discovered in accordance with this theory. when a substance burns, phlogiston, it was said, rushes out of it. but why does rapid burning only take place in air? because, said priestley, air has a great affinity for phlogiston, and draws it out of the burning substance. what then becomes of this phlogiston? we next inquire. the answer is, obviously it remains in the air around the burning body, and this is proved by the fact that this air soon becomes incapable of supporting the process of burning, it becomes phlogisticated. now, if phlogisticated air cannot support combustion, the greater the quantity of phlogiston in air, the less will it support burning; but we know that if a substance is burnt in a closed tube containing air, the air which remains when the burning is quite finished at once extinguishes a lighted candle. priestley also proved that an air can be obtained by heating _red precipitate_, characterized by its power of supporting combustion with great vigour. what is this but common air completely deprived of phlogiston? it is dephlogisticated air. now, if common air draws phlogiston out of substances, surely this dephlogisticated air will even more readily do the same. that it really does this priestley thought he had proved by his experiment with clean iron nails (see p. ). water was regarded as a substance which, like air, readily combined with phlogiston; but priestley thought that a candle burned less vigorously in dephlogisticated air which had been shaken with water than in the same air before this treatment; hence he concluded that phlogiston had been taken from the water. after cavendish had discovered (or rather rediscovered) hydrogen, and had established the fact that this air is extremely inflammable, most chemists began to regard this gas as pure or nearly pure phlogiston, or, at least, as a substance very highly charged with phlogiston. "now," said priestley, "when a metal burns phlogiston rushes out of it; if i restore this phlogiston to the metallic calx, i shall convert it back into the metal." he then showed by experiment that when calx of iron is heated with hydrogen, the hydrogen disappears and the metal iron is produced. he seemed, therefore, to have a large experimental basis for his answer to the question, "what happens when a substance burns?" but at a later time it was proved that iron was also produced by heating the calx of iron with carbon. the antiphlogistic chemists regarded fixed air as composed of carbon and dephlogisticated air; the phlogisteans said it was a substance highly charged with phlogiston. the antiphlogistic school said that calx of iron is composed of iron and dephlogisticated air; the phlogisteans said it was iron deprived of its phlogiston. here was surely an opportunity for a crucial experiment: when calx of iron is heated with carbon, and iron is produced, there must either be a production of fixed air (which is a non-inflammable gas, and forms a white solid substance when brought into contact with limewater), or there must be an outrush of phlogiston from the carbon. the experiment was tried: a gas was produced which had no action on limewater and which was very inflammable; what could this be but phlogiston, already recognized by this very property of extreme inflammability? thus the phlogisteans appeared to triumph. but if we examine these experiments made by priestley with the light thrown on them by subsequent research, we find that they bear the interpretation which he put on them only because they were not accurate; thus, two gases are inflammable, but it by no means follows that these gases are one and the same. we must have more accurate knowledge of the properties of these gases. the air around a burning body, such as iron, after a time loses the power of supporting combustion; but this is merely a qualitative fact. accurately to trace the change in the properties of this air, it is absolutely necessary that exact measurements should be made; when this is done, we find that the volume of air diminishes during the combustion, that the burning body gains weight, and that this gain in weight is just equal to the loss in weight undergone by the air. when the inflammable gas produced by heating calx of iron with carbon was carefully and _quantitatively_ analyzed, it was found to consist of carbon and oxygen (dephlogisticated air), but to contain these substances in a proportion different from that in which they existed in fixed air. it was a new kind of air or gas; it was _not_ hydrogen. this account of priestley's experiments and conclusions regarding combustion shows how easy it is in natural science to interpret experimental results, especially when these results are not very accurate, in accordance with a favourite theory; and it also illustrates one of the lessons so emphatically taught by all scientific study, viz. the necessity of suspending one's judgment until accurate measurements have been made, and the great wisdom of then judging cautiously. about priestley left lord shelburne, and went as minister of a chapel to birmingham, where he remained until . during his stay in birmingham, priestley had a considerable amount of pecuniary help from his friends. he had from lord shelburne, according to an agreement made when he entered his service, an annuity of £ a year for life; some of his friends raised a sum of money annually for him, in order that he might be able to prosecute his researches without the necessity of taking pupils. during the ten years or so after he settled in birmingham, priestley did a great deal of chemical work, and made many discoveries, almost entirely in the field of pneumatic chemistry. besides the discovery of dephlogisticated air (or oxygen) which has been already described, priestley discovered and gave some account of the properties of _nitrous air_ (nitric acid), _vitriolic acid air_ (sulphur dioxide), _muriatic acid air_ (hydrochloric acid), and _alkaline air_ (ammonia), etc. in the course of his researches on the last-named air he showed, that when a succession of electric sparks is passed through this gas a great increase in the volume of the gas occurs. this fact was further examined at a later time by berthollet, who, by measuring the increase in volume undergone by a measured quantity of ammonia gas, and determining the nature of the gases produced by the passage of the electric sparks, proved that ammonia is a compound of hydrogen and nitrogen, and that three volumes of the former gas combine with one volume of the latter to produce two volumes of ammonia gas. priestley's experiments on "inflammable air"--or hydrogen--are important and interesting. the existence of this substance as a definite kind of air had been proved by the accurate researches of cavendish in . priestley drew attention to many actions in which this inflammable air is produced, chiefly to those which take place between acids and metals. he showed that inflammable air is not decomposed by electric sparks; but he thought that it was decomposed by long-continued heating in closed tubes made of lead-glass. priestley regarded inflammable air as an air containing much phlogiston. he found that tubes of lead-glass, filled with this air, were blackened when strongly heated for a long time, and he explained this by saying that the lead in the glass had a great affinity for phlogiston, and drew it out of the inflammable air. when inflammable air burns in a closed vessel containing common air, the latter after a time loses its property of supporting combustion. priestley gave what appeared to be a fairly good explanation of this fact, when he said that the inflammable air parted with phlogiston, which, becoming mixed with the ordinary air in the vessel, rendered it unable to support the burning of a candle. he gave a few measurements in support of this explanation; but we now know that the method of analysis which he employed was quite untrustworthy. thinking that by measuring the extent to which the _phlogistication_ (we would now say the _deoxidation_) of common air was carried by mixing measured quantities of common and inflammable airs and exploding this mixture, he might be able to determine the amount of phlogiston in a given volume of inflammable air, he mixed the two airs in glass tubes, through the sides of which he had cemented two pieces of wire, sealed the tubes, and exploded the mixture by passing electric sparks from wire to wire. the residual air now contained, according to priestley, more phlogiston, and therefore relatively less dephlogisticated air than before the explosion. he made various measurements of the quantities of dephlogisticated air in the tubes, but without getting any constant results. he noticed that after the explosions the insides of the tubes were covered with moisture. at a later time he exploded a mixture of dephlogisticated and inflammable airs (oxygen and hydrogen) in a copper globe, and recorded the fact that after the explosion the globe contained a little water. priestley was here apparently on the eve of a great discovery. "in looking for one thing," says priestley, "i have generally found another, and sometimes a thing of much more value than that which i was in quest of." had he performed the experiment of exploding dephlogisticated and inflammable airs with more care, and had he made sure that the airs used were quite dry before the explosion, he would probably have found a thing of indeed much more value than that of which he was in quest; he would probably have discovered the compound nature of water--a discovery which was made by cavendish three or four years after these experiments described by priestley. some very curious observations were made by priestley regarding the colour of the gas obtained by heating "spirit of nitre" (_i.e._ nitric acid). he showed that a yellow gas or air is obtained by heating colourless liquid spirit of nitre in a sealed glass tube, and that as the heating is continued the colour of the gas gets darker, until it is finally very dark orange red. these experiments have found an explanation only in quite recent times. another discovery made by priestley while in birmingham, viz. that an acid is formed when electric sparks are passed through ordinary air for some time, led, in the hands of cavendish--an experimenter who was as careful and deliberate as priestley was rapid and careless--to the demonstration of the composition of nitric acid. many observations were made by priestley on the effects of various airs on growing plants and living animals; indeed, one of his customary methods of testing different airs was to put a mouse into each and watch the effects of the air on its breathing. he grew sprigs of mint in common air, in dephlogisticated air (oxygen), and in phlogisticated air (nitrogen, but probably not pure); the sprig in the last-named air grew best, while that in the dephlogisticated air soon appeared sickly. he also showed that air which has been rendered "noxious" by the burning of a candle in it, or by respiration or putrefaction, could be restored to its original state by the action of growing plants. he thought that the air was in the first instance rendered noxious by being impregnated with phlogiston, and that the plant restored the air by removing this phlogiston. thus priestley distinctly showed that (to use his own words) "it is very probable that the injury which is continually done to the atmosphere by the respiration of such a number of animals as breathe it, and the putrefaction of such vast masses, both of vegetable and animal substances, exposed to it, is, in part at least, repaired by the vegetable creation." but from want of quantitative experiments he failed to give any just explanation of the process whereby this "reparation" is accomplished. during his stay in birmingham, priestley was busily engaged, as was his wont during life, in writing metaphysical and theological treatises and pamphlets. at this time the minds of men in england were much excited by the events of the french revolution, then being enacted before them. priestley and some of his friends were known to sympathize with the french people in this great struggle, as they had been on the side of the americans in the war of independence. priestley's political opinions had, in fact, always been more advanced than the average opinion of his age; by some he was regarded as a dangerous character. but if we read what he lays down as a fundamental proposition in the "essay on the first principles of civil government" ( ), we cannot surely find anything very startling. "it must be understood, whether it be expressed or not, that all people live in society for their mutual advantage; so that the good and happiness of the members, that is the majority of the members of any state, is the great standard by which everything relating to that state must be finally determined. and though it may be supposed that a body of people may be bound by a voluntary resignation of all their rights to a single person, or to a few, it can never be supposed that the resignation is obligatory on their posterity, because it is manifestly contrary to the good of the whole that it should be so." priestley proposed many political reforms, but he was decidedly of opinion that these ought to be brought about gradually. he was in favour of abolishing all religious state establishments, and was a declared enemy to the church of england. his controversies with the clergy of birmingham helped to stir up a section of public opinion against him, and to bring about the condemnation of his writings in many parts of the country; he was also unfortunate in making an enemy of mr. burke, who spoke against him and his writings in the house of commons. in the year , the day of the anniversary of the taking of the bastille was celebrated by some of priestley's friends in birmingham. on that day a senseless mob, raising the cry of "church and king," caused a riot in the town. finding that they were not checked by those in authority, they after a time attacked and burned dr. priestley's meeting-house, and then destroyed his dwelling-house, and the houses of several other dissenters in the town. one of his sons barely escaped with his life. he himself found it necessary to leave birmingham for london, as he considered his life to be in danger. many of his manuscripts, his library, and much of his apparatus were destroyed, and his house was burned. a congregation at hackney had the courage at this time to invite priestley to become their minister. here he remained for about three years, ministering to the congregation, and pursuing his chemical and other experiments with the help of apparatus and books which had been supplied by his friends, and by the expenditure of part of the sum, too small to cover his losses, given him by government in consideration of the damage done to his property in the riots at birmingham. but finding himself more and more isolated and lonely, especially after the departure of his three sons to america, which occurred during these years, he at last resolved to follow them, and spend the remainder of his days in the new world. although priestley had been very badly treated by a considerable section of the english people, yet he left his native country "without any resentment or ill will." "when the time for reflection," he says, "shall come, my countrymen will, i am confident, do me more justice." he left england in , and settled at northumberland, in pennsylvania, about a hundred and thirty miles north-west of philadelphia. by the help of his friends in england he was enabled to build a house and establish a laboratory and a library; an income was also secured sufficient to maintain him in moderate comfort. the chair of chemistry in the university of philadelphia was offered to him, and he was also invited to the charge of a unitarian chapel in new york; but he preferred to remain quietly at work in his laboratory and library, rather than again to enter into the noisy battle of life. in america he published several writings. of his chemical discoveries made after leaving england, the most important was that an inflammable gas is obtained by heating metallic calces with carbon. the production of this gas was regarded by priestley as an indisputable proof of the justness of the theory of phlogiston (see pp. , ). his health began to give way about ; gradually his strength declined, and in february , the end came quietly and peacefully. a list of the books and pamphlets published by priestley on theological, metaphysical, philological, historical, educational and scientific subjects would fill several pages of this book. his industry was immense. to accomplish the vast amount of work which he did required the most careful outlay of time. in his "memoirs," partly written by himself, he tells us that he inherited from his parents "a happy temperament of body and mind;" his father especially was always in good spirits, and "could have been happy in a workhouse." his paternal ancestors had, as a race, been healthy and long-lived. he was not himself robust as a youth, yet he was always able to study: "i have never found myself," he says, "less disposed or less qualified for mental exertion of any kind at one time of the day more than another; but all seasons have been equal to me, early or late, before dinner or after." his peculiar evenness of disposition enabled him quickly to recover from the effects of any unpleasant occurrence; indeed, he assures us that "the most perfect satisfaction" often came a day or two after "an event that afflicted me the most, and without any change having taken place in the state of things." another circumstance which tended to make life easy to him was his fixed resolution, that in any controversy in which he might be engaged, he would frankly acknowledge every mistake he perceived himself to have fallen into. priestley's scientific work is marked by rapidity of execution. the different parts do not hang together well; we are presented with a brilliant series of discoveries, but we do not see the connecting strings of thought. we are not then astonished when he tells us that sometimes he forgot that he had made this or that experiment, and repeated what he had done weeks before. he says that he could not work in a hurry, and that he was therefore always methodical; but he adds that he sometimes blamed himself for "doing to-day what had better have been put off until to-morrow." many of his most startling discoveries were the results of chance operations, "not of themes worked out and applied." he was led to the discovery of oxygen, he says, by a succession of extraordinary accidents. but that he was able to take advantage of the chance observations, and from these to advance to definite facts, constitutes the essential difference between him and ordinary plodding investigators. although he rarely, if ever, saw all the bearings of his own discoveries, although none of his experiments was accurately worked out to its conclusion, yet he did see, rapidly and as it appeared almost at one glance, something of their meanings, and this something was enough to urge him on to fresh experimental work. although we now condemn priestley's theories as quite erroneous, yet we must admire his undaunted devotion to experiment. he was a true student of science in one essential point, viz. nature was for him the first and the last court of appeal. he theorized and speculated much, he experimented rapidly and not accurately, but he was ever appealing to natural facts; and in doing this he could not but lay some foundation which should remain. the facts discovered by him are amongst the very corner-stones on which the building of chemical science was afterwards raised. so enthusiastic was priestley in the prosecution of his experiments, that when he began, he tells us, "i spent all the money i could possibly raise, carried on by my ardour in philosophical investigation, and entirely regardless of consequences, except so far as never to contract any debts." he seems all through his life to have been perfectly free from anxiety about money affairs. priestley's manner of work shows how kindly and genial he was. he trained himself to talk and think and write with his family by the fireside; "nothing but reading aloud, or speaking without interruption," was an obstruction to his work. priestley was just the man who was wanted in the early days of chemical science. by the vast number, variety and novelty of his experimental results, he astonished scientific men--he forcibly drew attention to the science in which he laboured so hard; by the brilliancy of some of his experiments he obliged chemists to admit that a new field of research was opened before them, and the instruments for the prosecution of this research were placed in their hands; and even by the unsatisfactoriness of his reasoning he drew attention to the difficulties and contradictions of the theories which then prevailed in chemistry. that the work of priestley should bear full fruit it was necessary that a greater than he should interpret it, and should render definite that which priestley had but vaguely shown to exist. the man who did this, and who in doing it really established chemistry as a science, was lavoisier. but before considering the work of lavoisier, i should like to point out that many of the physical characters of common air had been clearly established in the later years of the seventeenth century by the honourable robert boyle. in the "sceptical chymist," published in , mr. boyle had established the fact that air is a material substance possessed of weight, that this air presses on the surface of all things, and that by removing part of the air in an enclosed space the pressure within that space is diminished. he had demonstrated that the boiling point of water is dependent on the pressure of the air on the surface of the water. having boiled some water "a pretty while, that by the heat it might be freed from the latitant air," he placed the vessel containing the hot water within the receiver of an arrangement which he had invented for sucking air out of an enclosed space; as soon as he began to suck out air from this receiver, the water boiled "as if it had stood over a very quick fire.... once, when the air had been drawn out, the liquor did, upon a single exsuction, boil so long with prodigiously vast bubbles, that the effervescence lasted almost as long as was requisite for the rehearsing of a _pater noster_." boyle had gone further than the qualitative fact that the volume of an enclosed quantity of air alters with changes in the pressure to which that air is subjected; he had shown by simple and accurate experiments that "the volume varies inversely as the pressure." he had established the generalization of so much importance in physical science now known as _boyle's law_. the work of the honourable henry cavendish will be considered in some detail in the book on "the physicists" belonging to this series, but i must here briefly allude to the results of his experiments on air published in the _philosophical transactions_ for and . cavendish held the ordinary view that when a metal burns in air, the air is thereby phlogisticated; but why is it, he asked, that the volume of air is decreased by this process? it was very generally said that fixed air was produced during the calcination of metals, and was absorbed by the calx. but cavendish instituted a series of experiments which proved that no fixed air could be obtained from metallic calces. in inflammable air (hydrogen) was discovered by cavendish; he now proved that when this air is exploded with dephlogisticated air (oxygen), water is produced. he showed that when these two airs are mixed in about the proportion of two volumes of hydrogen to one volume of oxygen, the greater part, if not the whole of the airs is condensed into water by the action of the electric spark. he then proceeded to prove by experiments that when common air is exploded with inflammable air water is likewise produced, and phlogisticated air (_i.e._ nitrogen) remains. priestley and cavendish had thus distinctly established the existence of three kinds of air, viz. dephlogisticated air, phlogisticated air, and inflammable air. cavendish had shown that when the last named is exploded with common air water is produced (which is composed of dephlogisticated and inflammable airs), and phlogisticated air remains. common air had thus been proved to consist of these two--phlogisticated and dephlogisticated airs (nitrogen and oxygen). applying these results to the phenomenon of the calcination of metals, cavendish gave reasons for thinking that the metals act towards common air in a manner analogous to that in which inflammable air acts--that they withdraw dephlogisticated and leave phlogisticated air; but, as he was a supporter of the phlogistic theory, he rather preferred to say that the burning metals withdraw dephlogisticated air and phlogisticate that which remains; in other words, while admitting that a metal in the process of burning gains dephlogisticated air, he still thought that the metal also loses _something_; viz. phlogiston. that cavendish in - had proved air to consist of two distinct gases, and water to be produced by the union of two gases, must be remembered as we proceed with the story of the discoveries of lavoisier. * * * * * antoine laurent lavoisier, born in paris in , was the son of a wealthy merchant, who, judging from his friendship with many of the men of science of that day, was probably of a scientific bent of mind, and who certainly showed that he was a man of sense by giving his son the best education which he could obtain. after studying in the mazarin college, lavoisier entered on a course of training in physical, astronomical, botanical and chemical science. the effects of this training in the accurate methods of physics are apparent in the chemical researches of lavoisier. at the age of twenty-one lavoisier wrote a memoir which gained the prize offered by the french government for the best and most economical method of lighting the streets of a large city. while making experiments, the results of which were detailed in this paper, lavoisier lived for six weeks in rooms lighted only by artificial light, in order that his eyesight might become accustomed to small differences in the intensities of light from various sources. when he was twenty-five years old lavoisier was elected a member of the academy of sciences. during the next six years ( - ) he published various papers, some on chemical, some on geological, and some on mathematical subjects. indeed at this time, although an ardent cultivator of natural science, he appears to have been undecided as to which branch of science he should devote his strength. the accuracy and thoroughness of lavoisier's work, and the acuteness of his reasoning powers, are admirably illustrated in two papers, published in the memoirs of the academy for , on the alleged conversion of water into earth. when water is boiled for a long time in a glass vessel a considerable quantity of white siliceous earth is found in the vessel. this apparent conversion or transmutation of water into earthy matter was quite in keeping with the doctrines which had been handed down from the times of the alchemists; the experiment was generally regarded as conclusively proving the possibility of changing water into earth. lavoisier found that after heating water for a hundred and one days in a closed _and weighed_ glass vessel, there was no change in the total weight of the vessel and its contents; when he poured out the water and evaporated it to dryness, he obtained . grains of solid earthy matter; but he also found, what had been before overlooked, that the glass vessel had lost weight. the actual loss amounted to . grains. the difference between this and the weight of the earthy matter in the water, viz. three grains, was set down (and as we now know justly set down) by lavoisier to errors of experiment. lavoisier therefore concluded that water, when boiled, is not changed into earth, but that a portion of the earthy matter of which glass is composed is dissolved by the water. this conclusion was afterwards confirmed by the swedish chemist _scheele_, who proved that the composition of the earthy matter found in the water is identical with that of some of the constituents of glass. by this experiment lavoisier proved the old alchemical notion of transmutation to be erroneous; he showed that water is not transmuted into earth, but that each of these substances is possessed of definite properties which belong to it and to it only. he established the all-important generalization--which subsequent research has more amply confirmed, until it is to-day accepted as the very foundation of every branch of physical science--that in no process of change is there any alteration in the total mass of matter taking part in that change. the glass vessel in which lavoisier boiled water for so many days lost weight; but the matter lost by the glass was found dissolved in the water. we know that this generalization holds good in all chemical changes. solid sulphur may be converted into liquid oil of vitriol, but it is only by the sulphur combining with other kinds of matter; the weight of oil of vitriol produced is always exactly equal to the sum of the weights of the sulphur, hydrogen and oxygen which have combined to form it. the colourless gases, hydrogen and oxygen, combine, and the limpid liquid water is the result; but the weight of the water produced is equal to the sum of the weights of hydrogen and oxygen which combined together. it is impossible to overrate the importance of the principle of the _conservation of mass_, first definitely established by lavoisier. some time about the year lavoisier turned his attention seriously to chemical phenomena. in he published a volume entitled "essays physical and chemical," wherein he gave an historical account of all that had been done on the subject of airs from the time of paracelsus to the year , and added an account of his own experiments, in which he had established the facts that a metal in burning absorbs air, and that when the metallic calx is reduced to metal by heating with charcoal, an air is produced of the same nature as the fixed air of dr. black. in november lavoisier deposited a sealed note in the hands of the secretary to the academy of sciences. this note was opened on the st of may , and found to run as follows[ ]:-- "about eight days ago i discovered that sulphur in burning, far from losing, augments in weight; that is to say, that from one pound of sulphur much more than one pound of vitriolic acid is obtained, without reckoning the humidity of the air. phosphorus presents the same phenomenon. this augmentation of weight arises from a great quantity of air which becomes fixed during the combustion, and which combines with the vapours. "this discovery, confirmed by experiments which i regard as decisive, led me to think that what is observed in the combustion of sulphur and phosphorus might likewise take place with respect to all the bodies which augment in weight by combustion and calcination; and i was persuaded that the augmentation of weight in the calces of metals proceeded from the same cause. the experiment fully confirmed my conjectures. "i operated the reduction of litharge in closed vessels with hale's apparatus, and i observed that at the moment of the passage of the calx into the metallic state, there was a disengagement of air in considerable quantity, and that this air formed a volume at least one thousand times greater than that of the litharge employed. "as this discovery appears to me one of the most interesting which has been made since stahl, i thought it expedient to secure to myself the property, by depositing the present note in the hands of the secretary of the academy, to remain secret till the period when i shall publish my experiments. "lavoisier. "paris, th november ." in his paper "on the calcination of tin in closed vessels, and on the cause of increase of weight acquired by the metal during this process" (published in ), we see and admire lavoisier's manner of working. a weighed quantity (about half a pound) of tin was heated to melting in a glass retort, the beak of which was drawn out to a very small opening; the air within the retort having expanded, the opening was closed by melting the glass before the blowpipe. the weight of retort and tin was now noted; the tin was again heated to its melting point, and kept at this temperature as long as the process of calcination appeared to proceed; the retort and its contents were then allowed to cool and again weighed. no change was caused by the heating process in the total weight of the whole apparatus. the end of the retort beak was now broken off; air rushed in with a hissing sound. the retort and contents were again weighed, and the increase over the weight at the moment of sealing the retort was noted. the calcined tin in the retort was now collected and weighed. it was found that the increase in the weight of the tin was equal to the weight of the air which rushed into the retort. hence lavoisier concluded that the calcination of tin was accompanied by an absorption of air, and that the difference between the weights of the tin and the calx of tin was equal to the weight of air absorbed; but he states that probably only a part of the air had combined with the tin, and that hence air is not a simple substance, but is composed of two or more constituents. between the date of this publication and that of lavoisier's next paper on combustion we know that priestley visited paris. in his last work, "the doctrine of phlogiston established" (published in ), priestley says, "having made the discovery of dephlogisticated air some time before i was in paris in , i mentioned it at the table of mr. lavoisier, when most of the philosophical people in the city were present; saying that it was a kind of air in which a candle burned much better than in common air, but i had not then given it any name. at this all the company, and mr. and mrs. lavoisier as much as any, expressed great surprise. i told them that i had got it from _precipitatum per se_, and also from _red lead_." in lavoisier's paper, "on the nature of the principle which combines with the metals during their calcination, and which augments their weight," was read before the academy. the preparation and properties of an air obtained, in november , from _red precipitate_ are described, but priestley's name is not mentioned. it seems probable, however, that lavoisier learned the existence and the mode of preparation of this air from priestley;[ ] but we have seen that even in priestley was quite in the dark as to the true nature of the air discovered by him (p. ). in papers published in the next three or four years lavoisier gradually defined and more thoroughly explained the phenomenon of combustion. he burned phosphorus in a confined volume of air, and found that about one-fourth of the air disappeared, that the residual portion of air was unable to support combustion or to sustain animal life, that the phosphorus was converted into a white substance deposited on the sides of the vessel in which the experiment was performed, and that for each grain of phosphorus used about two and a half grains of this white solid were obtained. he further described the properties of the substance produced by burning phosphorus, gave it the name of _phosphoric acid_, and described some of the substances formed by combining it with various bases. the burning of candles in air was about this time studied by lavoisier. he regarded his experiments as proving that the air which remained after burning a candle, and in which animal life could not be sustained, was really present before the burning; that common air consisted of about one-fourth part of dephlogisticated air and three-fourths of _azotic air_ (_i.e._ air incapable of sustaining life); and that the burning candle simply combined with, and so removed the former of these, and at the same time produced more or less fixed air. in his treatise on chemistry lavoisier describes more fully his proof that the calcination of a metal consists in the removal, by the metal, of dephlogisticated air (or oxygen) from the atmosphere, and that the metallic calx is simply a compound of metal and oxygen. the experiments are strictly quantitative and are thoroughly conclusive. he placed four ounces of pure mercury in a glass balloon, the neck of which dipped beneath the surface of mercury in a glass dish, and then passed a little way up into a jar containing fifty cubic inches of air, and standing in the mercury in the dish. there was thus free communication between the air in the balloon and that in the glass jar, but no communication between the air inside and that outside the whole apparatus. the mercury in the balloon was heated nearly to its boiling point for twelve days, during which time red-coloured specks gradually formed on the surface of the metal; at the end of this time it was found that the air in the glass jar measured between forty-two and forty-three cubic inches. the red specks when collected amounted to forty-five grains; they were heated in a very small retort connected with a graduated glass cylinder containing mercury. between seven and eight cubic inches of pure dephlogisticated air (oxygen) were obtained in this cylinder, and forty-one and a half grains of metallic mercury remained when the decomposition of the red substance was completed. the conclusion drawn by lavoisier from these experiments was that mercury, when heated nearly to boiling in contact with air, withdraws oxygen from the air and combines with this gas to form _red precipitate_, and that when the red precipitate which has been thus formed is strongly heated, it parts with the whole of its oxygen, and is changed back again into metallic mercury. lavoisier had now ( - ) proved that the calces of mercury, tin and lead are compounds of these metals with oxygen; and that the oxygen is obtained from the atmosphere when the metal burns. but the phlogistic chemistry was not yet overthrown. we have seen that the upholders of phlogiston believed that in the inflammable air of cavendish they had at last succeeded in obtaining the long-sought-for phlogiston. now they triumphantly asked, why, when metals dissolve in diluted vitriolic or muriatic acid with evolution of inflammable air, are calces of these metals produced? and they answered as triumphantly, because these metals lose phlogiston by this process, and we know that a calx is a metal deprived of its phlogiston. lavoisier contented himself with observing that a metallic calx always weighed more than the metal from which it was produced; and that as inflammable air, although much lighter than common air, was distinctly possessed of weight, it was not possible that a metallic calx could be metal deprived of inflammable air. he had given a simple explanation of the process of calcination, and had proved, by accurate experiments, that this explanation was certainly true in some cases. although all the known facts about solution of metals in acids could not as yet be brought within his explanation, yet none of these facts was absolutely contradictory of that explanation. he was content to wait for further knowledge. and to gain this further knowledge he set about devising and performing new experiments. the upholders of the theory of phlogiston laid considerable stress on the fact that metals are produced by heating metallic calces in inflammable air; the air is absorbed, they said, and so the metal is reproduced. it was obviously of the utmost importance that lavoisier should learn more about this inflammable air, and especially that he should know exactly what happened when this air was burned. he therefore prepared to burn a large quantity of inflammable air, arranging the experiment so that he should be able to collect and examine the product of this burning, whatever should be the nature of that product. but at this time the news was brought to paris that cavendish had obtained water by burning mixtures of inflammable and dephlogisticated airs. this must have been a most exciting announcement to lavoisier; he saw how much depended on the accuracy of this statement, and as a true student of nature, he at once set about to prove or disprove it. on the th of june , in the presence of the king and several notabilities (including sir charles blagden, secretary of the royal society, who had told lavoisier of the experiments of cavendish), lavoisier and laplace burned inflammable and dephlogisticated airs, and obtained water. as the result of these experiments they determined that one volume of dephlogisticated air combines with . volumes of inflammable air to form water. a little later lavoisier completed the proof of the composition of water by showing that when steam is passed through a tube containing iron filings kept red hot, inflammable air is evolved and calx of iron remains in the tube. lavoisier could now explain the conversion of a metallic calx into metal by the action of inflammable air; this air decomposes the calx--that is, the metallic oxide--combines with its oxygen to form water, and so the metal is produced. when a metal is dissolved in diluted vitriolic or muriatic acid a calx is formed, because, according to lavoisier, the water present is decomposed by the metal, inflammable air is evolved, and the dephlogisticated air of the water combines with the metal forming a calx, which then dissolves in the acid. lavoisier now studied the properties of the compounds produced by burning phosphorus, sulphur and carbon in dephlogisticated air. he found that solutions of these compounds in water had a more or less sour taste and turned certain blue colouring matters red; but these were the properties regarded as especially belonging to acids. these products of combustion in dephlogisticated air were therefore acids; but as phosphorus, carbon and sulphur were not themselves acids, the acid character of the substances obtained by burning these bodies in dephlogisticated air must be due to the presence in them of this air. hence lavoisier concluded that this air is the substance the presence of which in a compound confers acid properties on that compound. this view of the action of dephlogisticated air he perpetuated in the name "oxygen" (from greek, = _acid-producer_), which he gave to dephlogisticated air, and by which name this gas has ever since been known. priestley was of opinion that the atmosphere is rendered noxious by the breathing of animals, because it is thereby much phlogisticated, and he thought that his experiments rendered it very probable that plants are able to purify this noxious air by taking away phlogiston from it (see p. ). but lavoisier was now able to give a much more definite account of the effects on the atmosphere of animal and vegetable life. he had already shown that ordinary air contains oxygen and azote (nitrogen), and that the former is alone concerned in the process of combustion. he was now able to show that animals during respiration draw in air into their lungs: that a portion of the oxygen is there combined with carbon to form carbonic acid gas (as the fixed air of black was now generally called), which is again expired along with unaltered azote. respiration was thus proved to be a process chemically analogous to that of calcination. thus, about the year - , the theory of phlogiston appeared to be quite overthrown. the arguments of its upholders, after this time, were not founded on facts; they consisted of fanciful interpretations of crudely performed experiments. cavendish was the only opponent to be dreaded by the supporters of the new chemistry. but we have seen that although cavendish retained the language of the phlogistic theory (see pp. , ) as in his opinion equally applicable to the facts of combustion with that of the new or lavoisierian theory, he nevertheless practically admitted the essential point of the latter, viz. that calces are compounds of metal and oxygen (or dephlogisticated air). although cavendish was the first to show that water is produced when the two gases hydrogen and oxygen are exploded together, it would yet appear that he did not fully grasp the fact that water is a compound of these two gases; it was left to lavoisier to give a clear statement of this all-important fact, and thus to remove the last prop from under the now tottering, but once stately edifice built by stahl and his successors. the explanation given by lavoisier of combustion was to a great extent based on a conception of element and compound very different from that of the older chemists. in the "sceptical chymist" ( ) boyle had argued strongly against the doctrine of the four "elementary principles," earth, air, fire and water, as held by the "vulgar chymists." the existence of these principles, or some of them, in every compound substance was firmly held by most chemists in boyle's time. they argued thus: when a piece of green wood bums, the existence in the wood of the principle of fire is made evident by the flame, of the principle of air by the smoke which ascends, of that of water by the hissing and boiling sound, and of the principle of earth by the ashes which remain when the burning is finished.[ ] boyle combated the inference that because a flame is visible round the burning wood, and a light air or smoke ascends from it, _therefore_ these principles were contained in the wood before combustion began. he tried to prove by experiments that one substance may be obtained from another in which the first substance did not already exist; thus, he heated water for a year in a closed glass vessel, and obtained solid particles heavier than, and as he supposed formed from, the water. we have already learned the true interpretation of this experiment from the work of lavoisier. boyle grew various vegetables in water only, and thought that he had thus changed water into solid vegetable matter. he tells travellers' tales of the growth of pieces of iron and other metals in the earth or while kept in underground cellars. we now know how erroneous in most points this reasoning was, but we must admit that boyle established one point most satisfactorily, viz. that because earth, or air, or fire, or water is obtained by heating or otherwise decomposing a substance, it does not necessarily follow that the earth, or air, or fire, or water existed as such in the original substance. he overthrew the doctrine of elementary principles held by the "vulgar chymists." defining elements as "certain primitive and simple bodies which, not being made of any other bodies, or of one another, are the ingredients of which all those called perfectly mixt bodies are immediately compounded, and into which they are ultimately resolved," boyle admitted the _possible_ existence, but thought that the facts known at his time did not warrant the assertion of the _certain_ existence, of such "elements." the work of hooke and mayow on combustion tended to strengthen this definition of "element" given by boyle. black, as we have seen, clearly proved that certain chemical substances were possessed of definite and unvarying composition and properties; and lavoisier, indirectly by his explanation of combustion, and directly in his "treatise on chemistry", laid down the definition of "element" which is now universally adopted. an element is a substance from which no simpler forms of matter--that is, no forms of matter each weighing less than the original substance--have _as yet_ been obtained. in the decade - chemical science was thus established on a sure foundation by lavoisier. like most great builders, whether of physical or mental structures, he used the materials gathered by those who came before him, but the merit of arranging these materials into a well-laid foundation, on which the future building might firmly rest, is due to him alone. the value of lavoisier's work now began to be recognized by his fellow-chemists in france. in berthollet, one of the most rising of the younger french chemists, declared himself a convert to the views of lavoisier on combustion. fourcroy, another member of the academy, soon followed the example of berthollet. fourcroy, knowing the weakness of his countrymen, saw that if the new views could be made to appear as especially the views of frenchmen, the victory would be won; he therefore gave to the theory of lavoisier the name "_la chimie française_". although this name was obviously unfair to lavoisier, it nevertheless caused the antiphlogistic theory to be identified with the french chemists, and succeeded in impressing the french public generally with the idea that to hold to the old theory was to be a traitor to the glory of one's country. m. de morveau, who held a prominent place both in politics and science, was invited to paris, and before long was persuaded to embrace the new theory. this conversion--for "the whole matter was managed as if it had been a political intrigue rather than a philosophical inquiry"--was of great importance to lavoisier and his friends. m. de morveau was editor of the chemical part of the "encyclopédie méthodique;" in that part of this work which had appeared before de morveau had skilfully opposed the opinions of lavoisier, but in the second part of the work he introduced an advertisement announcing the change in his opinions on the subject of combustion, and giving his reasons for this change. the importance of having a definite language in every science is apparent at each step of advance. lavoisier found great difficulty in making his opinions clear because he was obliged to use a language which had been introduced by the phlogistic chemists, and which bore the impress of that theory on most of its terms. about the years - , lavoisier, berthollet, fourcroy and de morveau drew up a new system of chemical nomenclature. the fundamental principles of that system have remained as those of every nomenclature since proposed. they are briefly these:-- an element is a substance from which no form of matter simpler than itself has as yet been obtained. every substance is to be regarded as an element until it is proved to be otherwise. the name of every compound is to tell of what elements the substance is composed, and it is to express as far as possible the relative amounts of the elements which go to form the compound. thus the compounds of oxygen with any other element were called oxides, _e.g._ iron oxide, mercury oxide, tin oxide, etc. when two oxides of iron came to be known, one containing more oxygen relatively to the amount of iron present than the other, that with the greater quantity of oxygen was called iron peroxide, and that with the smaller quantity iron protoxide. we now generally prefer to use the name of the element other than oxygen in adjectival form, and to indicate the relatively smaller or greater quantity of oxygen present by modifications in the termination of this adjective. thus iron protoxide is now generally known as ferr_ous_ oxide, and iron peroxide as ferr_ic_ oxide. but the principles laid down by the four french chemists in - remain as the groundwork of our present system of nomenclature. the antiphlogistic theory was soon adopted by all french chemists of note. we have already seen that black, with his usual candour and openness to conviction, adopted and taught this theory, and we are assured by dr. thomas thomson that when he attended black's classes, nine years after the publication of the french system of nomenclature, that system was in general use among the chemical students of the university. the older theory was naturally upheld by the countrymen of the distinguished stahl after it had been given up in france. in the year klaproth, who was then professor of chemistry in berlin, proposed to the berlin academy of sciences to repeat the more important experiments on which the lavoisierian theory rested, before the academy. his offer was accepted, and from that time most of the berlin chemists declared themselves in favour of the new theory. by the close of last century the teaching of lavoisier regarding combustion found almost universal assent among chemists. but this teaching carried with it, as necessary parts, the fundamental distinction between element and compound; the denial of the existence of "principles" or "essences;" the recognition of the study of actually occurring reactions between substances as the basis on which all true chemical knowledge was to be built; and the full acknowledgment of the fact that matter is neither created nor destroyed, but only changed as to its form, in any chemical reaction. of lavoisier's other work i can only mention the paper on "specific heats" contributed by laplace and lavoisier to the memoirs of the academy for . in this paper is described the ice calorimeter, whereby the amount of heat given out by a substance in cooling from one definite temperature to another is determined, by measuring the amount of ice converted into water by the heated substance in cooling through the stated interval of temperature. the specific heats of various substances, _e.g._ iron, glass, mercury, quicklime, etc., were determined by the help of this instrument. as we read the record of work done by lavoisier during the years between and --work which must have involved a great amount of concentrated thought as well as the expenditure of much time--we find it hard to realize that the most tremendous political and social revolution which the modern world has seen was raging around him during this time. in the earlier days of the french revolution, and in the time immediately preceding that movement, many minds had been stirred to see the importance of the study of nature; but it was impossible that natural science should continue to flourish when the tyrant robespierre had begun the reign of terror. the roll of those who perished during this time contains no more illustrious name than that of antoine laurent lavoisier. in the year lavoisier, who had for some time acted as a _fermier-général_ under the government, was accused of mixing with the tobacco "water and other ingredients hurtful to the health of the citizens." on this pretext he and some of his colleagues were condemned to death. for some days lavoisier found a hiding-place among his friends, but hearing that his colleagues had been arrested, he delivered himself up to the authorities, only asking that the death sentence should not be executed until he had completed the research in which he was engaged; "not" that he was "unwilling to part with life," but because he thought the results would be "for the good of humanity." "the republic has no need of chemists; the course of justice cannot be suspended," was the reply. on the th of may , the guillotine did its work; and in his fifty-first year lavoisier "joined the majority." to the honour of the academy of which he was so illustrious a member it is recorded that a deputation of his fellow-workers in science, braving the wrath of robespierre, penetrated to the dungeons of the prison and placed a wreath on the grave of their comrade. * * * * * the period of the infancy of chemical science which i have now briefly described is broadly contemporaneous with the second half of the eighteenth century. at this time the minds of men were greatly stirred. opinions and beliefs consecrated by the assent of generations of men were questioned or denied; the pretensions of civil and ecclesiastical authorities were withstood; assertions however strongly made, and by whatever authority supported, were met by demands for reasons. in france this revolt against mere authority was especially marked. led by the great thinker voltaire, the french philosophers attacked the generally accepted views in moral, theological and historical matters. a little later they began to turn with eager attention and hope to the facts of external nature. physical science was cultivated with wonderful vigour and with surprising success. in the sciences of heat and light we have at this time the all-important works of fourier, prévost and fresnel; in geology and natural history we have buffon and cuvier; the name of bichat marks the beginning of biological science, and chemistry takes rank as a science only from the time of lavoisier. from the philosophers an interest in natural science spread through the mass of the people. about the year the lecture-rooms of the great teachers of chemistry, astronomy, electricity, and even anatomy were crowded with ladies and gentlemen of fashion in the french capital. a similar state of matters was noticeable in this country. dr. black's lecture theatre was filled by an audience which comprised many young men of good position. to know something of chemistry became an essential part of the training of all who desired to be liberally educated. the secrets of nature were now rapidly explored; astonishing advances were made, and as a matter of course much opposition was raised. in this active, inquiring atmosphere the young science of chemistry grew towards maturity. priestley, ever seeking for new facts, announcing discovery after discovery, attacking popular belief in most matters, yet satisfied to interpret his scientific discoveries in terms of the hypothesis with which he was most familiar, was the pioneer of the advancing science. he may be compared to the advance-guard sent forward by the explorers of a new country with orders to clear a way for the main body: his work was not to level the rough parts of the way, or to fill in the miry places with well-laid metal, but rather rapidly to make a road as far into the heart of the country as possible. and we have seen how well he did the work. in his discovery of various kinds of airs, notably of oxygen, he laid the basis of the great generalizations of lavoisier, and, what was perhaps of even more importance, he introduced a new method into chemistry. he showed the existence of a new and unexplored region. before his time, hooke and mayow had proved the existence of more than one kind of air, but the chemistry of gases arose with the discoveries of priestley. although black's chief research, on fixed air and on latent heat, was completed fifteen or twenty years before priestley's discovery of oxygen, yet the kind of work done by black, and its influence on chemical science, mark him as coming after priestley in order of development. we have seen that the work of black was characterized by thoroughness and suggestiveness. the largeness of scope, the breadth of view, of this great philosopher are best illustrated in his discourses on heat; he there leads us with him in his survey of the domain of nature, and although he tells us that hypotheses are a "mere waste of time," we find that it is by the strength of his imagination that he commands assent. but he never allows the imagination to degenerate into fanciful guesses; he vigorously tests the fundamental facts of his theory, and then he uses the imagination in developing the necessary consequences of these facts. to black we owe not only the first rigorously accurate chemical investigation, but also the establishment of just ideas concerning the nature of heat. but lavoisier came before us as a greater than either priestley or black. to great accuracy and great breadth of view he added wonderful power of generalizing; with these, aided by marked mental activity and, on the whole, favourable external circumstances, he was able finally to overthrow the loose opinions regarding combustion and elementary principles which prevailed before his time, and so to establish chemistry as one of the natural sciences. at the close of the first period of advance we find that the sphere of chemistry has been defined; that the object of the science has been laid down, as being to find an explanation of the remarkable changes noticed in the properties of bodies; that as a first step towards the wished-for explanation, all material substances have been divided by the chemist into elements and compounds; that an element has been defined as any kind of matter from a given weight of which no simpler forms of matter--that is, no kinds of matter each weighing less than the original matter--have as yet been obtained; that the great principle of the indestructibility of matter has been established, viz. that however the properties of matter may be altered, yet the total mass (or quantity) remains unchanged; and lastly, we find that an explanation of one important class of chemical changes--those changes which occur when substances burn--has been found. and we have also learned that the method by which these results were obtained was this--to go to nature, to observe and experiment accurately, to consider carefully the results of these experiments, and so to form a general hypothesis; by the use of the mental powers, and notably by the use of the imagination, to develop the necessary deductions from this hypothesis; and finally, to try these deductions by again inquiring from nature "whether these things were so." before the time which we have been considering the paths of chemical science had scarcely yet been trodden. each discovery was full of promise, each advance displayed the possibility of further progress; the atmosphere was filled as with "a mighty rushing wind" ready to sweep away the old order of things. the age was an age of doubt and of freedom from the trammels of authority; it was a time eminently suited for making advances in natural knowledge. in the unceasing activity of priestley and lavoisier we may trace the influence of the restlessness of the age; but in the quietness and strength of the best work of these men, and notably in the work of black; in the calmness with which priestley bore his misfortunes at birmingham; in the noble words of lavoisier, "i am not unwilling to part with life, but i ask time to finish my experiments, because the results will, i believe, be for the good of humanity"--we see the truth of the assertion made by one who was himself a faithful student of nature-- "nature never did betray the heart that loved her." footnotes: [ ] the translation is taken from thomson's "history of chemistry." [ ] nevertheless, in other places lavoisier most readily acknowledges the merits of priestley. [ ] a similar method of reasoning was employed so far back as the tenth century: thus, in an anglo-saxon "manual of astronomy" we read, "there is no corporeal thing which has not in it the four elements, that is, air and fire, earth and water.... take a stick and rub it on something, it becomes hot directly with the fire which lurks in it; burn one end, then goeth the moisture out at the other end with the smoke." chapter iii. establishment of general principles of chemical science--period of dalton. _john dalton_, - . the progress of chemical knowledge became so rapid in the early years of the present century, that although i have in this chapter called the time immediately succeeding that of lavoisier "the period of john dalton," and although i shall attempt to describe the advances made by this philosopher without considering those of his contemporaries davy and berzelius, yet i must insist on the facts that this arrangement is made purely for the sake of convenience, and that many of the discoveries of davy, berzelius and others came in order of time before, or followed close upon the publication of dalton's atomic theory. nevertheless, as the work of these men belongs in its essence to the modern period, and as the promulgation of the atomic theory by dalton marks the beginning of this period, it seems better that we should have a clear conception of what was done by this chemist before proceeding to consider the advances made by his contemporaries and successors. * * * * * john dalton, the second of three children of joseph and deborah dalton, was born at eaglesfield, a village near cockermouth, in cumberland, on the th of september . one of the first meeting-houses established by the society of friends is to be found in eaglesfield. the dalton family had been settled for several generations on a small copyhold estate in this village. the first of them to join the friends was the grandfather of john dalton; his descendants remained faithful adherents of this society. dalton attended the village schools of eaglesfield and the neighbourhood until he was eleven years old, by which time, in addition to learning reading, writing and arithmetic, he had "gone through a course of mensuration, surveying, navigation, etc." at the age of ten his taste for measurements and calculations began to be remarked by those around him; this taste was encouraged by mr. robinson, a relative of dalton, who recognizing the indomitable perseverance of the boy appears to have taken some care about this time in directing his mathematical studies. at the early age of twelve dalton affixed to the door of his father's house a large sheet of paper whereon he announced that he had opened a school for youth of both sexes; also that "paper, pens and ink" were sold within. the boy-teacher had little authority over his pupils, who challenged their master to fight in the graveyard, and broke the windows of the room into which they had been locked till their tasks should be learned. when he was fifteen years old dalton removed to kendal, where he continued for eleven or twelve years, at first as assistant-master, and then, along with his elder brother jonathan, as principal of a boarding school for boys. it was announced by the brothers that in this school "youth will be carefully instructed in english, latin, greek and french; also writing, arithmetic, merchants' accounts and the mathematics." the school was not very successful. both brothers were hard, inflexible, and ungainly in their habits, and neither was fitted to become a successful teacher of boys: of the two, john had the gentler disposition, and was preferred by the boys; "besides, his mind was so occupied by mathematics that their faults escaped his notice." during this time dalton employed his leisure in learning latin, greek and french, and in pursuing his studies in mathematics and natural philosophy. he became a frequent contributor to the _gentlemen's diary_, a paper which received problems of various kinds--chiefly mathematical--and presented prizes for their successful solution. besides setting and answering mathematical problems in this journal, and also in the _ladies' diary_, dalton sometimes ventured into the wider fields of mental phenomena. it seems strange to read that, even at the age of twenty-six, dalton should occupy his leisure time composing answers to such queries as these:-- "whether, to a generous mind, is the conferring or receiving an obligation, the greater pleasure?" "is it possible for a person of sensibility and virtue, who has once felt the passion of love in the fullest extent that the human heart is capable of receiving it (being by death or some other circumstance for ever deprived of the object of its wishes), ever to feel an equal passion for any other object?" in his answer to the second of these queries, dalton carefully framed two hypotheses, and as carefully drew conclusions from each. the question in the _diary_ was by "mira;" if "mira" were a "rapturous maiden" she would not derive much comfort from the cold and mathematical answer by "mr. john dalton of kendal." at kendal dalton made the acquaintance of mr. gough, who was about eight years older than dalton, and had been blind from the age of two. mr. gough, we are assured by dalton, was "a perfect master of the latin, greek and french tongues;" he understood "well all the different branches of mathematics;" there was "no branch of natural philosophy but what he was well acquainted with;" he knew "by the touch, taste and smell, almost every plant within twenty miles of kendal." to the friendship of this remarkable man dalton owed much; with his help he acquired a fair knowledge of the classical languages, and he it was who set dalton the example of keeping a regular record of weather observations. on the th of march dalton made his first entry in a book which he entitled "observations on the weather, etc.;" the last entry in this book he made fifty-seven years later on the evening preceding his death. the importance of dalton's meteorological observations, as leading him to the conception of the atomic theory, will be noticed as we proceed. in the year dalton, who was now twenty-seven years of age, was invited to manchester to become tutor in the mathematical and natural philosophy department of a college recently established by influential dissenters in that town. eighty pounds for the session of ten months was guaranteed him; and he was provided with "rooms and commons" in the college at a charge of £ _s._ per session. he held this appointment for six years, when he retired, and continuing to live in manchester devoted himself to researches in natural philosophy, gaining a living by giving private lessons in mathematics and physical science at a charge of _s._ _d._ per hour, or _s._ _d._ each if more than two pupils attended at the same time. dalton was elected a fellow of the literary and philosophical society of manchester in the year ; and from the time of his retiring from the tutorship of manchester new college till the close of his life he spent a great part of his time in a room in the society's house in george street, in studying and teaching. the fifty years thus spent are marked by few outward events. the history of dalton's life from this time is the history of the development of his intellect, and the record of his scientific discoveries. on one occasion during dalton's stay at kendal, as he was about to make a visit to his native village, he bethought himself that the present of a pair of silken hose would be acceptable to his mother. he accordingly purchased a pair marked "newest fashion;" but his mother's remark, "thou hast brought me a pair of grand hose, john; but what made thee fancy so light a colour? i can never show myself at meeting in them," rather disconcerted him, as to his eyes the hose were of the orthodox drab colour. his mother insisted that the stockings were "as red as a cherry." john's brother upheld the "drab" side of the dispute; so the neighbours were called in, and gave their decision that the hose were "varra fine stuff, but uncommon scarlety." from this time dalton made observations on the peculiarities of his own vision and that of others, and in his first paper read before the literary and philosophical society in , he described these peculiarities. he says, "since the year the occasional study of botany obliged me to attend more to colour than before. with respect to colours that were white, yellow, or green, i readily assented to the appropriate term; blue, purple, pink and crimson appeared rather less distinguishable, being, according to my idea, all referable to blue. i have often seriously asked a person whether a flower was blue or pink, but was generally considered to be in jest." dalton's colour-blindness was amusingly illustrated at a later time, when having been created d.c.l. by the university of oxford he continued to wear the red robes of his degree for some days; and when his attention was drawn to the somewhat strange phenomenon, even in a university town, of an elderly gentleman in the dress of a quaker perambulating the town day after day in a scarlet robe, he remarked that to him the gown appeared to be of the same colour as the green trees. dalton's work during the next six or eight years dealt chiefly with problems suggested by his meteorological observations; he published a volume on "meteorological observations and essays," chiefly occupied with descriptions of the instruments employed, more especially of the thermometer and barometer, and an instrument for determining the dew-point of air. by this time he had established the existence of a connection of some kind between magnetism and the aurora, and had thus laid the foundations of a most important branch of meteorology. in , in a note to a paper on rain and dew, he begins his work on aqueous vapour in the atmosphere by proving that water vapour exists as such in the air. this paper is quickly followed by another on the conducting power of water for heat. a very important paper was published in , on the "constitution of mixed gases, etc.," wherein dalton asserted that the total pressure of a mixture of two gases on the walls of the containing vessel is equal to the sum of the pressures of each gas; in other words, that if one gas is removed the pressure now exerted by the remaining gas is exactly the same as was exerted by that gas in the original mixture. in a paper published much later ( ), when his views and experiments on this subject were matured, he writes: "it appears to me as completely demonstrated as any physical principle, that whenever two or more ... gases or vapours ... are put together, either into a limited or unlimited space, they will finally be arranged each as if it occupied the whole space, and the others were not present; the nature of the fluids and gravitation being the only efficacious agents." this conclusion was followed out and extended in a paper published in , on the absorption of gases by water and other liquids, wherein he states that the amount of each gas _mechanically dissolved_ by a liquid from a mixture of gases depends only on the quantity of _that_ gas in the mixture, the other gases exerting no influence in this respect. dalton now considered the variation in the pressures of various gases caused by increasing or decreasing temperature, and then proceeded to discuss the relations which exist between the volumes of gases and the temperature at which these volumes are measured. he concluded that "all elastic fluids" under the same pressure expand equally by heat: and he adds the very important remark, "it seems, therefore, that general laws respecting the absolute quantity and the nature of heat are more likely to be derived from the study of elastic fluids than of other substances"--a remark the profound truth of which has been emphasized by each step in the advances made in our conception of the nature of heat since the time of dalton. in these papers on the "constitution of mixed gases" dalton also describes and illustrates a method whereby the actual amount of water vapour in a given bulk of atmospheric air may be found from a knowledge of the dew-point of that air, that is, the temperature at which the deposition of water in the liquid form begins. the introduction of this method for finding the humidity of air marks an important advance in the history of meteorology. in this series of papers published within the first three years of the present century dalton evidently had before his mind's eye a picture of a gas as a quantity of matter built up of small but independent particles; he constantly speaks of pressures between the small particles of elastic fluids, of these particles as repelling each other, etc. in his "new system" he says, "a vessel full of any pure elastic fluid presents to the imagination a picture like one full of small shot." it is very important to notice that dalton makes use of this conception of small particles to explain purely physical experiments and operations. although we know that during these years he was thinking much of "chemical combinations," yet we find that it was his observations on the weather which led him to the conception--a purely physical conception--of each chemically distinct gas as being built up of a vast number of small, equally heavy particles. a consideration of these papers by dalton on the constitution of mixed gases shows us the method which he pursued in his investigations. "the progress of philosophical knowledge," he says, "is advanced by the discovery of new and important facts; but much more when these facts lead to the establishment of general laws." dalton always strove to attain to general laws. the facts which he describes are frequently inaccurate; he was singularly deficient in manipulation, and he cannot claim a high place as a careful experimenter. he was however able to draw general conclusions of wide applicability. he seems sometimes to have stated a generalization in definite form before he had obtained any experimental verification of it. in the year dalton conducted an examination of air from various localities, and concluded that one hundred volumes of air are composed of twenty-one volumes of oxygen and seventy-nine volumes of nitrogen. this appears to have been his first piece of purely chemical work. but in the next year he again returns to physical phenomena. in the paper already referred to, on the absorption of gases by water and other liquids, published in this year, he had stated that "all gases that enter into water and other liquids by means of pressure, and are wholly disengaged again by the removal of that pressure, are _mechanically_ mixed with the liquid, and not _chemically_ combined with it." but if this be so, why, he asked, does not water mechanically dissolve the same bulk of every kind of gas? the answer which he gives to this question is found at the close of the paper; to the student of chemistry it is very important:-- "this question i have duly considered, and though i am not yet able to satisfy myself completely, i am nearly persuaded that the circumstance depends upon the weight and number of the ultimate particles of the several gases, those whose particles are lightest and single being least absorbable, and the others more, accordingly as they increase in weight and complexity. an inquiry into the relative weights of the ultimate particles of bodies is a subject, as far as i know, entirely new. i have lately been prosecuting this inquiry with remarkable success. the principle cannot be entered upon in this paper; but i shall just subjoin the results, as far as they appear to be ascertained by my experiments." then follows a "_table of the relative weights of the ultimate particles of gaseous and other bodies._" the following numbers, among others, are given:-- hydrogen sulphur · oxygen · alcohol · azote · nitrous oxide · phosphorus · ether · here is the beginning of the atomic theory; and yet dalton's strictly chemical experimental work lies in the future. the scope of the theory is defined in that sentence--"_an inquiry into the relative weights of the ultimate particles of bodies._" his paper on mixed gases is illustrated by a plate,[ ] which shows how vividly dalton at this time pictured to himself a quantity of gas as composed of many little particles, and how clearly he recognized the necessity of regarding all the particles of each elementary gas as alike, but as differing from those of every other elementary gas. in dalton was invited to deliver a course of lectures in the royal institution of london, on heat, mixed gases and similar subjects. in these lectures he expounded his views on the constitution of gases, on absorption of gases by liquids, etc. these views drew much attention in this and other countries. "they are busy with them," he writes in , "at london, edinburgh, paris and in various parts of germany, some maintaining one side and some another. the truth will surely out at last." [illustration: fig. ] dalton's love of numerical calculations is noticeable in a trivial circumstance which he mentions in a letter from london to his brother. he tried to count the number of coaches which he met in going to the friends' morning meeting: this he assures his brother he "effected with tolerable precision. the number was one hundred and four." during vacation time dalton usually made a walking excursion in the lake district. he was extremely fond of mountain scenery, but generally combined the pursuit of science with that of pleasure; he carried his meteorological instruments with him, determined the dew-point at various altitudes, and measured mountain heights by the aid of his barometer. sometimes however he refused to have anything to do with science. a companion in one of these excursions says that he was "like a schoolboy enjoying a holiday, mocking the cuckoos, putting up and chasing the hares, stopping from time to time to point out some beautiful view, or loitering to chat with passing pedestrians." this side of dalton's nature was not often apparent. in him the quiet, hard-working student generally appeared prominently marked; but on the half-holiday which he allowed himself on each thursday afternoon, in order to enjoy the society of a few friends and to engage in his favourite amusement of a game at bowls, he laid aside something of the quietness, regularity and decorum which usually characterized him. "when it came to his turn to bowl he threw his whole soul into the game,... and it was not a little amusing to spectators to see him running after the ball across the green, stooping down as if talking to it, and waving his hands from one side to the other exactly as he wished the line of the ball to be, and manifesting the most intense interest in its coming near to the point at which he aimed." from the year - dalton becomes more and more a worker in chemistry. the establishment of the atomic theory now engaged most of his time and attention. the results of his investigation of "the primary laws which seem to obtain in regard to heat and to chemical combinations" appeared in his "new system of chemical philosophy," part i. of which, "on heat, on the constitution of bodies and on chemical synthesis," was published in . we have now arrived at the time when dalton's inquiry into the "relative weights of the ultimate particles of bodies" was in his opinion sufficiently advanced for presentation to the scientific world; but i think we shall do better to postpone our consideration of this great inquiry until we have completed our review of the chief events in the life of dalton, other than this the greatest event of all. dalton did not look for rewards--he desired only the just fame of one who sought for natural truths; but after the publication of the "new system" rewards began to come to him. in he was elected a corresponding member of the french academy of sciences. in , when his fame as a philosophical chemist was fully established, dalton visited paris. this visit gave him great pleasure. he was constantly in the society of the great men who then so nobly represented the dignity of natural science in france; laplace, cuvier, biot, arago, gay-lussac, milne-edwards and others were his friends. for some time after this visit he was more vivacious and communicative than usual, and we are told by one who lived in the same house as he, "we frequently bantered him with having become half a frenchman." dalton especially valued the friendship of clementine cuvier, daughter of the great naturalist, with whom he became acquainted during his visit to paris. all through life he greatly delighted in the society of cultivated women, and his warmest friendships were with gentlewomen. at one time, shortly after going to manchester, he was much taken by a widow lady who combined great personal charms with considerable mental culture. "during my _captivity_," he writes to a friend, "which lasted about a week, i lost my appetite, and had other symptoms of _bondage_ about me, as incoherent discourse, etc., but have now happily regained my freedom." the society of men who like himself were actively engaged in the investigation of natural science was also a source of much pleasure to dalton. such men used to visit him in manchester, so that in the house of the rev. mr. johns, in whose family he lived, "there were found from time to time some of the greatest philosophers in europe." dalton was elected a fellow of the royal society in , and four years later he became the first recipient of one of the royal medals, then founded by the king (george iv.). in he was elected one of the eight foreign associates of the french academy, an honour which is generally regarded as the highest that can be bestowed on any man of science. dalton was one of the original members of the british association for the advancement of science, and he attended most of the meetings from the first held in york in to that held in manchester two years before his death. at the oxford meeting of he was created d.c.l. by the university, and two years later the university of edinburgh honoured herself by enrolling his name on the list of her doctors of law. about this time some of dalton's scientific friends, who considered his work of great national importance, endeavoured to obtain a pension for him from the civil list. at the meeting of the british association held at cambridge in , the president, professor sedgwick, was able to announce that "his majesty, willing to manifest his attachment to science, and his regard for a character like that of dr. dalton, had graciously conferred on him, out of the funds of the civil list, a substantial mark of his royal favour." the "substantial mark of royal favour," the announcement of which dalton received "with his customary quietness and simplicity of manner," consisted of a pension of £ _per annum_, which was increased three years later to £ . the second part of volume i. of his "new system" was published by dalton in , and the second volume of the same work in . in a paper by him was read before the british association, in which he announced some important discoveries with regard to the water in crystallizable salts, and thus brought a new class of facts within the range of the atomic theory. he was seized with paralysis in , but recovered to a great extent; a second attack in however completely prostrated him. on the th of july in that year he made the last entry in his book of "observations on the weather"--"_little rain_;" next morning he became insensible and quietly passed away. * * * * * it is as the founder of the chemical atomic theory that dalton must ever be remembered by all students of physical and chemical science. to the greek philosophers leucippus and democritus (flourished about - b.c.) we owe the conception that "the bodies which we see and handle, which we can set in motion or leave at rest, which we can break in pieces and destroy, are composed of smaller bodies, which we cannot see or handle, which are always in motion, and which can neither be stopped, nor broken in pieces, nor in any way destroyed or deprived of the least of their properties" (clerk maxwell). the heavier among these small indivisible bodies or atoms were regarded as always moving downwards. by collisions between these and the lighter ascending atoms lateral movements arose. by virtue of the natural law (as they said) that things of like weight and shape must come to the same place, the atoms of the various elements came together; thus larger masses of matter were formed; these again coalesced, and so finally worlds came into existence. this doctrine was extended by epicurus ( - b.c.), whose teaching is preserved for us in the poem of lucretius ( - b.c.), "de rerum natura;" he ascribed to the atoms the power of deviating from a straight line in their descending motion. on this hypothesis epicurus built a general theory to explain all material and spiritual phenomena. the ceaseless change and decay in everything around them was doubtless one of the causes which led men to this conception of atoms as indivisible, indestructible substances which could never wear out and could never be changed. but even here rest could not be found; the mind was obliged to regard these atoms as always in motion. the dance of the dust-motes in the sunbeam was to lucretius the result of the more complex motion whereby the atoms which compose that dust are agitated. in his dream as told by tennyson-- "a void was made in nature: all her bonds cracked: and i saw the flaring atom-streams and torrents of her myriad universe, ruining along the illimitable inane, fly on to clash together again, and make another and another frame of things for ever." the central quest of the physicist, from the days of democritus to the present time, has been to explain the conception of "atom"--to develop more clearly the observed properties of the things which are seen and which may be handled as dependent on the properties of those things which cannot be seen, but which yet exist. for two thousand years he has been trying to penetrate beneath the ever-changing appearances of nature, and to find some surer resting-place whence he may survey these shifting pictures as they pass before his mental vision. the older atomists thought to find this resting-place, not in the atoms themselves, but in the wide spaces which they supposed to exist between the worlds:-- "the lucid interspace of world and world where never creeps a cloud, or moves a wind, nor ever falls the least white star of snow, nor ever lowest roll of thunder moans, nor sound of human sorrow mounts to mar their sacred everlasting calm." to the modern student of science the idea of absolute rest appears unthinkable; but in the most recent outcome of the atomic theory--in the vortex atoms of helmholtz and thomson--he thinks he perceives the very "foundation stones of the material universe." newton conceived the atom as a "solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, movable particle." to the mind of d. bernoulli the pressure exerted by a gas on the walls of a vessel enclosing it was due to the constant bombardment of the walls by the atoms of which the gas consisted. atomic motion was the leading idea in the explanation of heat given by rumford and davy, and now universally accepted; and, as we have seen, dalton was himself accustomed to regard all "elastic fluids" (_i.e._ gases) as consisting of vast numbers of atoms. but in the year or so, dalton thought that by the study of chemical combinations it would be possible to determine the relative weights of atoms. assume that any elementary gas is composed of small, indivisible, equally heavy parts; assume that the weight of an atom of one element is different from that of the atom of any other element; and, lastly, assume that when elements combine the atom of the compound so produced is built up of the atoms of the various elements. make these assumptions, and it follows that the relative weights of two or more elements which combine together must represent the relative weights of the atoms of these elements. we know that the fixity of composition of chemical compounds had been established before this time, largely by the labours of black and lavoisier. fixity of composition had however been called in question by berthollet, who held that elements combine together in very varying quantities; that, in fact, in place of there being two or three, or a few definite compounds of, say, iron and oxygen, there exists a graduated series of such bodies; and that the amount of iron which combines with oxygen depends chiefly on such physical conditions as the temperature, the pressure, etc., under which the chemical action occurs. but by the date of the publication of the first part of dalton's "new system," the long dispute between berthollet and proust regarding fixity of composition of compounds had nearly closed in favour of the latter chemist, who strongly upheld the affirmative side of the argument. but if dalton's assumptions are correct, it is evident that when two elements form more than one compound, the quantity of element a in one of these must be a simple multiple of the quantity in the other of these compounds; because there must be a greater number of atoms of element a in the atom of one compound than in that of the other compound, and an elementary atom is assumed to be indivisible. hence it follows that if one element be taken as a standard, it must be possible to affix to any other element a certain number which shall express the smallest quantity of that element which combines with one part by weight of the standard element; and this number shall also represent how many times the atom of the given element is heavier than the atom of the standard element, the weight of which has been taken to be _one_. if this element forms two compounds with the standard element, the amount of this element in the second compound must be expressed by a simple multiple of the number assigned to this element, because it is not possible, according to the fundamental assumptions of the theory, to form a compound by the combination of fractions of elementary atoms. by pondering on the facts regarding chemical combinations which had been established by various workers previous to the year , dalton had apparently come to such conclusions as those now indicated. in his paper on the properties of the gases constituting the atmosphere, read to the manchester society on november , , he stated that one hundred measures of common air would combine with thirty-six measures of "nitrous gas" in a narrow tube to produce an oxide of nitrogen, but with seventy-two measures of the same gas in a wide vessel to produce another oxide of nitrogen. these facts, he says, "clearly point out the theory of the process: the elements of oxygen may combine with a certain portion of nitrous gas, or with twice that portion, but with no intermediate quantity." in the concluding paragraph of his paper on absorption of gases by liquids, read on october , , we found (see p. ) that he had got so far in his inquiry into the "relative weights of the ultimate particles of bodies" as to give a table of twenty-one such weights. about this time dalton made analyses of two gaseous compounds of carbon--olefiant gas and carburetted hydrogen or marsh-gas. he found that both are compounds of carbon and hydrogen; that in one . parts by weight of carbon are combined with one part by weight of hydrogen, and in the other the same amount ( . ) of carbon is combined with two parts by weight of hydrogen.[ ] this was a striking confirmation of his views regarding combination in multiple proportions, which views followed as a necessary deduction from the atomic hypothesis. from this time he continued to develop and extend this hypothesis, and in the year he published his "new system of chemical philosophy." the first detailed account of the atomic theory was however given to the chemical world the year before dalton's book appeared. during a conversation with dalton in the autumn of dr. thomas thomson learned the fundamental points of the new theory, and in the third edition of his "system of chemistry," published in , he gave an account of dalton's views regarding the composition of bodies. in the same year a paper by thomson appeared in the _philosophical transactions_, wherein it was experimentally proved that oxalic acid combines with strontia to form two distinct compounds, one of which contains twice as much oxalic acid as the other, the amount of strontia being the same in both. analyses of the oxalates of potash, published about the same time by wollaston, afforded another illustration of the _law of multiple proportions_, and drew the attention of chemists to dalton's theory. but the new theory was opposed by several very eminent chemists, notably by sir humphry davy. in the autumn of wollaston, thomson and davy were present at the dinner of the royal society club, at the crown and anchor, in the strand. after dinner, these three chemists discussed the new theory for an hour and a half, wollaston and thomson trying to convince davy of the truth of dalton's theory; but "so far from being convinced, he went away, if possible, more prejudiced against it than ever." soon after this wollaston succeeded in convincing mr. davis gilbert (afterwards president of the royal society) of the justness of the atomic theory, and he in turn so placed the facts and the reasoning before davy, that from this time he became a supporter of the new theory. in order that the atomic theory should be fruitful of results, it was now necessary that the values of the atomic weights of many elements should be carefully determined. let us consider what knowledge must be acquired before the value to be assigned to the atomic weight of an element can be found. hydrogen was the element chosen as a standard by dalton. he assumed that the atom of hydrogen weighs ; the atomic weight of any other element is therefore a number which tells how many times the atom of that element is heavier than the atom of hydrogen. thus, when dalton said the atomic weight of oxygen is , he meant that the atom of oxygen is eight times heavier than that of hydrogen. how was this number obtained? accurate analyses of water show that in this liquid one part by weight of hydrogen is combined with eight parts by weight of oxygen; but (it is said) as the atom of hydrogen weighs , the atom of oxygen must weigh . in drawing this conclusion it is assumed that the atom, or smallest particle, of water is built up of one atom of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen. let it be assumed that the atom of water contains two atoms of hydrogen and one of oxygen, then the latter atom must weigh sixteen times as much as each atom of hydrogen; let it be assumed that three atoms of hydrogen combine with one atom of oxygen to form an atom of water, then the weight of the oxygen atom must be twenty-four times that of the hydrogen atom. any one of these assumptions will equally satisfy the figures obtained by analyzing water ( : = : = : ). now, had we any method whereby we could determine how many times an atom of water is heavier than an atom of hydrogen we should be able to determine which of the foregoing assumptions is correct, and therefore to determine the atomic weight of oxygen. hence, before the atomic weight of an element can be determined, there must be found some method for determining the atomic weights of compounds of that element. unless this can be done the atomic theory is of little avail in chemistry. i conceive it to be one of the signal merits of dalton that he so clearly lays down rules, the best which could be devised at his time, for determining the atomic weights of compounds, or, what is the same thing, for determining the number of elementary atoms in one atom of any compound. in his "new system" he says that he wishes to show the importance of ascertaining "the relative weights of the ultimate particles both of simple and compound bodies, the number of simple elementary particles which constitute one compound particle, and the number of less compound particles which enter into the formation of one more compound particle." considering compounds of two elements, he divides these into binary, ternary, quaternary, etc., according as the compound atom contains two, three, four, etc., atoms of the elements. he then proceeds thus-- "the following general rules may be adopted as guides in all our investigations respecting chemical synthesis:-- " st. when only one combination of two bodies can be obtained, it must be presumed to be a _binary_ one, unless some cause appear to the contrary. " nd. when two combinations are observed, they must be presumed to be a _binary_ and a _ternary_. " rd. when three combinations are obtained, we may expect one to be _binary_ and the other two _ternary_. " th. when four combinations are observed, we should expect one _binary_, two _ternary_, and one _quaternary_," etc. only one compound of hydrogen and oxygen was then known; hence it was presumed to be a binary compound, _i.e._ a compound the smallest particle of which consisted of one atom of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen; and hence, from the data already given on page , it followed that the atomic weight of oxygen was . two compounds of carbon and oxygen were known, each containing six parts by weight of carbon, in one case united with eight, and in the other case with sixteen parts by weight of oxygen. from dalton's rules one of these was a binary, and the other a ternary compound; but as the atomic weight of oxygen had already been determined to be , that compound of carbon and oxygen containing eight of oxygen combined with six of carbon was decided to be binary, and that containing sixteen of oxygen (_i.e._ two atoms) to be ternary; and hence the atomic weight of carbon was determined to be . in the second part of the "new system" dalton, guided by these rules, determined experimentally the atomic weights of a great many substances; but this was not the kind of work suited to dalton's genius. his analytical determinations were generally inaccurate; nevertheless, he clearly showed how the values of the atomic weights of elements ought to be established, and he obtained results sufficiently accurate to confirm his general theory. to make accurate determinations of the relative weights of elementary atoms was one of the tasks reserved for the great swedish chemist berzelius (see pp. - ). when we examine dalton's rules we must confess that they appear somewhat arbitrary. he does not give reasons for his assertion that "when only one combination of two bodies can be obtained, it must be presumed to be a binary one." why may it not be ternary or quaternary? why must the atom of water be built up of one atom of hydrogen combined with one atom of oxygen? or, when two compounds are known containing the same pair of elements, why must one be binary and the other ternary? or, even assuming that this _must_ be justified by facts, does it follow that dalton's interpretation of the atomic structure of the two oxides of carbon is necessarily correct? these oxides contain of carbon + of oxygen, and of carbon + of oxygen, respectively. take the second, : = : ; assume this to be a binary compound of one atom of oxygen (weighing ) with one atom of carbon (weighing ), then the other will be a ternary compound containing one atom of oxygen ( ) and two atoms of carbon ( ). hence it appears that dalton's rules were too arbitrary, and that they were insufficient to determine with certainty the atomic weights of some of the elements. nevertheless, without some such rules as those of dalton, no great advances could have been made in applying the atomic theory to the facts of chemical combination; and dalton's rules were undoubtedly founded on wide considerations. in the appendix to volume ii. of his "new system" he expressly states that before the number of atoms of two elements present in the atom of a compound can be determined, it is necessary that many combinations should be examined, not only of these elements with each other, but also of each of these with other elements; and he tells us that to gather together facts bearing on this general question of chemical synthesis was the object of his work from the time of the promulgation of the atomic theory. when we find that dalton applied the term "atom" to the small particles of compound bodies, we at once see that by atom he could not always mean "that which cannot be cut;" he simply meant the smallest particle of a substance which exhibits the properties of that substance. a mass of water vapour was conceived by dalton as "like a mass of small shot." each shot exhibited the characteristic chemical properties of water vapour; it differed from the large quantity of vapour only in mass; but if one of these little pieces of shot were divided--as dalton, of course, knew it could be divided--smaller pieces of matter would be produced. but these would no longer be water; they would be new kinds of matter. they are called oxygen and hydrogen. as aids towards gaining a clear conception of the "atom" of a compound as a definite building, dalton made diagrammatic representations of the hypothetical structures of some of these atoms: the following plate is copied from the "new system:"--a represents an atom of alum; b, an atom of nitrate of alumina; c, of barium chloride; d, of barium nitrate; e, of calcium chloride; f calcium nitrate; g, of calcium sulphate; h, potassium carbonate; i, of potash; and k, an atom of soda. [illustration: fig. .] but i think if we consider this application of the term "atom" to elements and compounds alike, we shall see objections to it. when an atom of a compound is divided the smaller particles so produced are each very different in chemical properties from the atom which has just been divided. we may, if we choose, assume that the atom of an element could in like manner be divided, and that the products of this division would be different from the elementary atoms; but such a division of an elementary atom has not as a matter of fact been yet accomplished, unless we class among elements substances such as potash and soda, which for many years were universally regarded as elements, and rightly so regarded because they had not been decomposed. in dalton's nomenclature then, the term "atom" is applied alike to a small particle with definite properties known to be divisible into smaller particles, each with properties different from those of the undivided particle, and to a small particle which, so far as our knowledge goes, cannot be divided into any particle smaller than or different from itself. nevertheless, if the atomic theory was to be victorious, it was necessary that it should be applied to elements and compounds alike. until a clear conception should be obtained, and expressed in accurate language, of the differences in structure of the ultimate particles of compounds and of elements, it was perhaps better to apply the term "atom" to both alike. these two difficulties--( ) the difficulty of attaching to the term "atom" a precise meaning applicable to elements and compounds alike, and ( ) the difficulty of determining the number of elementary atoms in the atom of a given compound, and hence of determining the relative weights of elementary atoms themselves--were for many years stumbling-blocks in the path of the upholders of the daltonian theory. the very great difficulty of clearly comprehending the full meaning of dalton's proposed theory becomes apparent when we learn that within three years from the publication of part i. of the "new system," facts were made known by the french chemist gay-lussac, and the true interpretation of these facts was announced by the italian chemist avogadro, which facts and interpretation were sufficient to clear away both the difficulties i have just mentioned; but that nevertheless it is only within the last ten or fifteen years that the true meaning of the facts established by gay-lussac and the interpretation given by avogadro have been generally recognized. in gay-lussac, in a memoir on the combination of gaseous bodies, proved that gases combine chemically in simple proportions by volume, and that the volume of the product always bears a simple relation to the volumes of the combining gases. thus, he showed that two volumes of hydrogen combine with one volume of oxygen to form two volumes of water vapour; that one volume of nitrogen combines with three volumes of hydrogen to form two volumes of ammonia gas, and so on. now, as elements combine atom with atom, the weights of these combining volumes of elements must represent the relative weights of the atoms of the same elements. in avogadro distinguished between the ultimate particles of compounds and elements. let a gaseous element, a, combine with another gaseous element, b, to form a gaseous compound, c; then avogadro supposed that the little particles of a and the little particles of b (dalton's atoms) split up, each into two or more smaller particles, and that these smaller particles then combine together to form particles of the compound c. the smaller particles produced by splitting a daltonian elementary atom were regarded by avogadro as all identical in properties, but these very small particles could not exist uncombined either with each other or with very small particles of some other element. when the atom of a compound is decomposed, avogadro pictured this atom as splitting into smaller particles of two or three or more different kinds, according as the compound had contained two or three or different elements. to avogadro's mental vision an elementary gas appeared as built up of a great many little particles, each exhibiting in miniature all the properties of the gas. the gas might be heated, or cooled, or otherwise physically altered, but each of the little particles remained intact; the moment however that this gas was mixed with another on which it could chemically react, these little particles split into smaller parts, but as the smaller parts so produced could not exist in this state, they seized hold of the corresponding very small parts of the other gas, and thus a particle of a compound gas was produced. a compound gas was pictured by avogadro as also built up of small particles, each exhibiting in miniature the properties of the gas, and each remaining undecomposed when the gas was subjected only to physical actions; but when the gas was chemically decomposed, each little particle split, but the very small parts thus produced, being each a particle of an elementary substance, continued to exist, and could be recognized by the known properties of that element. to the smallest particle of any substance (elementary or compound) which exhibits the properties of that substance, and which cannot be split into parts without destroying these properties, we now give the name of _molecule_. a molecule is itself a structure. it is built up of parts; each of these parts we now call an _atom_. the molecule of a compound is, of course, composed of the atoms of the elements which form that compound. the molecule may contain two or three or more unlike atoms. the molecule of an element is composed of the atoms of that element, and all of these atoms are supposed to be alike. we cannot get hold of elementary atoms and examine them, but we have a large mass of evidence in favour of the view which regards the molecule of an element as composed of parts each weighing less than the molecule itself. the student of physics or chemistry now believes that, were a very small quantity of a gas (say ammonia) or a drop of a liquid (say water) magnified to something like the size of the earth, he should see before him a vast heap of particles of ammonia or of water, each exhibiting all the properties by the possession of which he now distinguishes ammonia or water from all other kinds of matter. he believes that he should see these particles in motion, each moving rapidly from place to place, sometimes knocking against another, sometimes traversing a considerable space without coming into collision with any other. but the student tries to penetrate yet further into the nature of things. to the vision of the chemist these particles of almost inconceivable minuteness are themselves built up of smaller particles. as there is an architecture of masses, so is there an architecture of molecules. hydrogen and oxygen are mixed; the chemist sees the molecules of each in their never-ceasing dance moving here and there among the molecules of the other, yet each molecule retaining its identity; an electric spark is passed through the mixture, and almost instantaneously he sees each hydrogen molecule split into two parts, and each oxygen molecule split into two parts, and then he sees these parts of molecules, these atoms, combine, a pair of hydrogen atoms with an atom of oxygen, to form compound molecules of water. avogadro's hypothesis gave the chemist a definition of "molecule;" it also gave him a definition of "atom." it is evident that, however many atoms of a given element there may be in this or in that compound molecule, no compound of this element can exist containing less than a single atom of the element in question; therefore an atom of an element is the smallest quantity of that element in the molecule of any compound thereof. and so we have come back to the original hypothesis of dalton; but we have extended and modified that hypothesis--we have distinguished two orders of small particles, the molecule (of a compound or of an element) and the atom (of an element). the combination of two or more elements is now regarded as being preceded by the decomposition of the molecules of these elements into atoms. we have defined molecule and we have defined atom, but before we can determine the relative weights of elementary atoms we must have a means of determining the relative weights of compound molecules. the old difficulty still stares us in the face--how can we find the number of elementary atoms in the molecule of a given compound? the same naturalist who enriched chemical science by the discovery of the molecule as distinct from the atom, placed in the hands of chemists the instrument for determining the relative weights of molecules, and thus also the relative weights of atoms. the great generalization, usually known as _avogadro's law_, runs thus: "_equal volumes of gases measured at the same temperature and under the same pressure contain equal numbers of molecules._" gay-lussac had concluded that "equal volumes of gases contain equal numbers of atoms;" but this conclusion was rejected, and rightly rejected by dalton, who however at the same time refused to admit that there is a simple relation between the combining volumes of elements. the generalization of avogadro has however stood the test of experiment, and is now accepted as one of the fundamental "laws" of chemical science. like the atomic theory itself, avogadro's law is an outcome of physical work and of physical reasoning. of late years the great naturalists, clausius, helmholtz, joule, rankine, clerk maxwell and thomson have developed the physical theory of molecules, and have shown that avogadro's law may be deduced as a necessary consequence from a few simple physical assumptions. this law has thus been raised, from being a purely empirical generalization, to the rank of a deduction from a wide, yet simple physical theory. now, if "equal volumes of gases contain equal numbers of molecules," it follows that the ratio of the densities of any two gases must also be the ratio of the weights of the molecules which constitute these gases. thus, a given volume of water vapour weighs nine times more than an equal volume of hydrogen; therefore the molecule of gaseous water is nine times heavier than the molecule of hydrogen. one has therefore only to adopt a standard of reference for molecular weights, and avogadro's law gives the means of determining the number of times any gaseous molecule is heavier than that of the standard molecule. but consider the combination of a gaseous element with hydrogen; let us take the case of hydrogen and chlorine, which unite to form gaseous hydrochloric acid, and let us determine the volumes of the uniting elements and the volume of the product. here is a statement of the results: one volume of hydrogen combines with one volume of chlorine to form two volumes of hydrochloric acid. assume any number of molecules we please in the one volume of hydrogen--say ten--there must be, by avogadro's law, also ten molecules in the one volume of chlorine; but inasmuch as the volume of hydrochloric acid produced is double that of either the hydrogen or the chlorine which combined to form it, it follows, by the same law, that twenty molecules of hydrochloric acid have been formed by the union of ten molecules of hydrogen with ten molecules of chlorine. the necessary conclusion is that each hydrogen molecule and each chlorine molecule has split into two parts, and that each half-molecule (or atom) of hydrogen has combined with one half-molecule (or atom) of chlorine, to produce one compound molecule of hydrochloric acid. therefore we conclude that the hydrogen molecule is composed of two atoms, and that the chlorine molecule is also composed of two atoms; and as hydrogen is to be our standard element, we say that if the atom of hydrogen weighs one, the molecule of the same element weighs two. it is now easy to find the _molecular weight_ of any gas; it is only necessary to find how many times heavier the given gas is than hydrogen, the weight of the latter being taken as . thus, oxygen is sixteen times heavier than hydrogen, but : = : , therefore the molecule of oxygen is thirty-two times heavier than the molecule of hydrogen. ammonia is eight and a half times heavier than hydrogen, but : - / = : , therefore the molecule of ammonia is seventeen times heavier than the molecule of hydrogen. this is what we more concisely express by saying "the molecular weight of oxygen is ," or "the molecular weight of ammonia is ," etc., etc. now, we wish to determine the _atomic weight_ of oxygen; that is, we wish to find how many times the oxygen atom is heavier than the atom of hydrogen. we make use of avogadro's law and of the definition of "atom" which has been deduced from it (see p. ). we know that eight parts by weight of oxygen combine with one part by weight of hydrogen to form water; but we do not know whether the molecule of water contains one atom of each element, or two atoms of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen, or some other combination of these atoms (see p. ). but by vaporizing water and weighing the gas so produced, we find that water vapour is nine times heavier than hydrogen: now, : = : , therefore the molecular weight of water gas is . analysis tells us that eighteen parts by weight of water gas contain sixteen parts of oxygen and two parts of hydrogen; that is to say, we now know that in the molecule of water gas there are two atoms of hydrogen combined with sixteen parts by weight of oxygen. we now proceed to analyze and determine the molecular weights of as many gaseous compounds of oxygen as we can obtain. the outcome of all is that we have as yet failed to obtain any such compound in the molecule of which there are less than sixteen parts by weight of oxygen. in some of these molecules there are sixteen, in some thirty-two, in some forty-eight, in some sixty-four parts by weight of oxygen, but in none is there less than sixteen parts by weight of this element. therefore we conclude that the atomic weight of oxygen is , because this is the smallest amount, referred to hydrogen taken as , which has hitherto been found in the molecule of any compound of oxygen. the whole of the work done since the publication of dalton's "new system" has emphasized the importance of that chemist's remark, that no safe conclusion can be drawn as to the value of the atomic weight of an element except from a consideration of many compounds of that with other elements. but in avogadro's law we have a far more accurate and trustworthy method for determining the molecular weights of compounds than any which dalton was able to devise by his study of chemical combinations. we have thus got a clearer conception of "atom" than was generally possessed by chemists in the days of dalton, and this we have gained by introducing the further conception of "molecule" as that of a quantity of matter different from, and yet similar to, the atom. the task now before us will for the most part consist in tracing the further development of the fundamental conception of dalton, the conception, viz., of each chemical substance as built up of small parts possessing all the properties, other than the mass, of the whole; and--what we also owe to dalton--the application of this conception to explain the facts of chemical combination. * * * * * the circumstances of dalton's early life obliged him to trust largely to his own efforts for acquiring knowledge; and his determination not to accept facts at second hand but to acquire them for himself, is very marked throughout the whole of his life. in the preface to the second part of the "new system" he says, "having been in my progress so often misled by taking for granted the results of others, i have determined to write as little as possible but what i can attest by my own experience." we should not expect such a man as this to make any great use of books; one of his friends tells us that he heard him declare on a public occasion that he could carry his library on his back, and yet had not read half of the books which comprised it. the love of investigation which characterized dalton when young would naturally be increased by this course of intellectual life. how strong this desire to examine everything for himself became, is amusingly illustrated by a story told by his medical adviser, dr. ransome. once when dalton was suffering from catarrh dr. ransome had prescribed a james's powder, and finding his patient much better next day, he congratulated himself and dalton on the good effects of the medicine. "i do not well see how that can be," said dalton, "as i kept the powder until i could have an opportunity of analyzing it." as dalton grew older he became more than ever disinclined to place much trust in the results obtained by other naturalists, even when these men were acknowledged to be superior to himself in manipulative and experimental skill. thus, as we have already learned, he could not be brought to allow the truth of gay-lussac's experimentally established law regarding gaseous combinations; he preferred to attribute gay-lussac's results to errors of experiment. "the truth is, i believe, that gases do not unite in equal or exact measures in any one instance; when they appear to do so it is owing to the inaccuracy of our experiments." that dalton did not rank high as an experimenter is evident from the many mistakes in matters of fact which are to be found in the second part of his "new system." a marked example of his inaccuracy in purely experimental work is to be found in the supposed proof given by him that charcoal, after being heated to redness, does not absorb gases. he strongly heated a quantity of charcoal, pulverized it, and placed it in a florence flask, which was connected by means of a stopcock with a bladder filled with carbonic acid: after a week he found that the flask and its contents had not sensibly increased in weight, and he concluded that no carbonic acid had been absorbed by the charcoal. but no trustworthy result could be obtained from an experiment in which the charcoal, having been deprived of air by heating, was again allowed to absorb air by being pulverized in an open vessel, and was then placed in a flask filled with air, communication between the carbonic acid and the external air being prevented merely by a piece of bladder, a material which is easily permeated by gases. dalton used a method which can only lead to notable results in natural science when employed by a really great thinker; he acquired a few facts, and then thought out the meaning of these. almost at the beginning of each investigation he tried to get hold of some definite generalization, and _then_ he proceeded to amass special facts. the object which he kept before himself in his experimental work was to establish or to disprove this or that hypothesis. every experiment was conducted with a clearly conceived aim. he was even willing to allow a large margin for errors of experiment if he could thereby bring the results within the scope of his hypothesis. that the _law of multiple proportions_ is simply a generalization of facts, and may be stated apart from the atomic theory, is now generally admitted. but in dalton's mind this law seems to have arisen rather as a deduction from the theory of atoms than to have been gained as a generalization from experiments. he certainly always stated this law in the language of the atomic theory. in one of his walking excursions he explained his theory to a friend, and after expounding his views regarding atomic combinations, he said that the examples which he had given showed the necessary existence of the principle of multiple proportions: "thou knowest it must be so, for no man can split an atom." we have seen that carburetted hydrogen was one of the compounds on the results of the analysis of which he built his atomic theory; yet we find him saying of the constitution of this compound that "no correct notion seems to have been formed till the atomic theory was introduced and applied in the investigation." when dalton was meditating on the laws of chemical combination, a french chemist, m. proust, published analyses of metallic oxides, which proved that when a metal forms two oxides the amount of metal in each is a fixed quantity--that there is a sudden jump, as it were, from one oxide to another. we are sometimes told that from these experiments proust would have recognized the law of multiple proportions had his analyses only been more accurate; but we know that dalton's analyses were very inaccurate, and yet he not only recognized the law of multiple proportions, but propounded and established the atomic theory. something more than a correct system of keeping books and balancing accounts is wanted in natural science. dalton's experimental results would be the despair of a systematic analyst, but from these dalton's genius evolved that splendid theory which has done so much to advance the exact investigation of natural phenomena. probably no greater contrast could be found between methods of work, both leading to the establishment of scientific (that is, accurate and precise) results, than that which exists between the method of dalton and the method pursued by priestley. priestley commenced his experiments with no particular aim in view; sometimes he wanted to amuse himself, sometimes he thought he might light upon a discovery of importance, sometimes his curiosity incited him to experiment. when he got facts he made no profound generalizations; he was content to interpret his results by the help of the prevailing theory of his time. but each new fact only spurred him on to make fresh incursions into the fields of nature. dalton thought much and deeply; his experimentally established facts were to him symbols of unseen powers. he used facts as hobbes says the wise man uses words: they were his counters only, not his money. when we ask how it was that dalton acquired his great power of penetrating beneath the surface of things and finding general laws, we must attribute this power in part to the training which he gave himself in physical science. it was from a consideration of physical facts that he gained the conception of ultimate particles of definite weight. his method was essentially dynamical; that is, he pictured a gas as a mass of little particles, each of which acted on and was acted on by, other particles. the particles were not thrown together anyhow; definite forces existed between them. each elementary or compound gas was pictured as a system of little particles, and the properties of that gas were regarded as dependent on the nature and arrangement of these particles. such a conception as this could only be gained by a careful and profound thinker versed in the methods of physical and mathematical science. thus we see that although dalton appeared to gain his great chemical results by a method which we are not generally inclined to regard as the method of natural science, yet it was by virtue of his careful training in a branch of knowledge which deals with facts, as well as in that science which deduces particular conclusions from general principles, that he was able to introduce his fruitful conceptions into the science of chemistry. to me it appears that dalton was pre-eminently distinguished by the possession of imagination. he formed clear mental images of the phenomena which he studied, and these images he was able to combine and modify so that there resulted a new image containing in itself all the essential parts of each separate picture which he had previously formed. from his intense devotion to the pursuit of science the development of dalton's general character appears to have been somewhat dwarfed. although he possessed imagination, it was the imagination of a naturalist rather than that of a man of broad culture. perhaps it was a want of broad sympathies which made him trust so implicitly in his own work and so readily distrust the work of others, and which moreover led him astray in so many of his purely experimental investigations. * * * * * dalton began his chemical work about six years after the death of lavoisier. unlike that great philosopher he cared nothing for political life. the friends in whose family he spent the greater part of his life in manchester were never able to tell whether he was whig or tory. unlike priestley he was content to let metaphysical and theological speculation alone. in his quiet devotion to study he more resembled black, and in his method, which was more deductive than that usually employed in chemistry, he also resembled the edinburgh professor. trained from his earliest days to depend on himself, nurtured in the creedless creed of the friends, he entered on his life's work with few prejudices, if without much profound knowledge of what had been done before him. by the power of his insight into nature and the concentration of his thought, he drew aside the curtain which hung between the seen and the unseen; and while herschel, sweeping the heavens with his telescope and night by night bringing new worlds within the sphere of knowledge, was overpowering men's minds by new conceptions of the infinitely great, john dalton, with like imaginative power, was examining the architecture of the ultimate particles of matter, and revealing the existence of law and order in the domain of the infinitely small. footnotes: [ ] see fig. , which is copied from the original in the "new system of chemical philosophy," and illustrates dalton's conception of a quantity of carbonic acid gas, each atom built up of one atom of carbon and two of oxygen; of nitrous oxide gas, each atom composed of one atom of nitrogen and one of oxygen; and of hydrogen gas, constituted of single atoms. [ ] more accurate analysis has shown that there are six parts of carbon united respectively with one and with two parts by weight of hydrogen in these compounds. chapter iv. establishment of general principles of chemical science (_continued_)--period of davy and berzelius. _humphry davy_, - . _johann jacob berzelius_, - . we may roughly date the period of chemical advance during which the connections between chemistry and other branches of natural knowledge were recognized and studied, as beginning with the first year of this century, and as continuing to our own day. the elaboration of the atomic theory was busily carried on during the second and third decades of this century; to this the labour of the swedish chemist berzelius largely contributed. that there exist many points of close connection between chemical and electrical science was also demonstrated by the labours of the same chemist, and by the brilliant and impressive discoveries of sir humphry davy. a system of classification of chemical elements and compounds was established by the same great naturalists, and many inroads were made into the domain of the chemistry of bodies of animal and vegetable origin. the work of berzelius and davy, characterized as it is by thoroughness, clearness and definiteness, belongs essentially to the modern era of chemical advance; but i think we shall better preserve the continuity of our story if we devote a chapter to a consideration of the work of these two renowned naturalists before entering on our review of the time immediately preceding the present, as typical workers in which time i have chosen liebig and dumas. in the last chapter we found that the foundations of the atomic theory had been laid, and the theory itself had been applied to general problems of chemical synthesis, by dalton. in giving, in that chapter, a short sketch of the modern molecular theory, and in trying to explain the meaning of the term "molecule" as contrasted with "atom," i necessarily carried the reader forward to a time considerably later than the first decade of this century. we must now retrace our steps; and in perusing the account of the work of berzelius and davy given in the present chapter, the reader must endeavour to have in his mind a conception of atom analogous to the mental picture formed by dalton (see pp. , ); he must regard the term as applicable to element and compound alike; he must remember that the work of which he reads is the work of those who are striving towards a clear conception of the atom, and who are gradually rising to a recognition of the existence of more than one order of small particles, by the regular putting together of which masses of matter are constituted. no materials, so far as i am aware, exist from which a life of berzelius can be constructed. i must therefore content myself with giving a mere enumeration of the more salient points in his life. of his chemical work abundant details are fortunately to be found in his own "lehrbuch," and in the works and papers of himself and his contemporaries. * * * * * johann jacob berzelius was the son of the schoolmaster of wäfersunda, a village near linköping, in east gothland, sweden. he was born in august --he was born, that is, a few years after priestley's discovery of oxygen; at the time when lavoisier had nearly completed his theory of combustion; when dalton was endeavouring to keep the unruly youth of eaglesfield in subjection; and when black, having established the existence of fixed air and the theory of latent heat, was the central figure in the band of students who were enlarging our knowledge of nature in the scottish capital. being left an orphan at the age of nine, the young berzelius was brought up by his grandfather, who appears to have been a man of education and sense. after attending school at linköping, he entered the university of upsala as a student of medicine. here he soon began to show a taste for chemistry. it would appear that few or no experiments were then introduced into his lectures by the professor of chemistry at upsala; little encouragement was given to pursue chemical experiments, and so berzelius had to trust to his own labours for gaining an acquaintance with practical chemistry. having thus made considerable progress in chemistry, and being on a visit to the mineral baths of medevi, he seized the opportunity to make a very thorough analysis of the waters of this place, which were renowned in sweden for their curative properties. the publication of this analysis marks the first appearance of berzelius as an author. he graduated as m.b. in , and a year or two later presented his dissertation, entitled "the action of galvanism on organic bodies," as a thesis for the degree of doctor of medicine. this thesis, like that of black, published about half a century earlier, marks an important stage in the history of chemistry. these and other publications made the young doctor famous; he was called to stockholm to be extraordinary (or assistant) professor of chemistry in the medical school of that capital. sometimes practising medicine in order to add to his limited income, but for the most part engaged in chemical research, he remained in stockholm for nearly fifty years, during most of which time the laboratory of berzelius in the swedish capital was regarded as one of the magnetic poles of the chemical world. to this point came many of the great chemists who afterwards enriched the science by their discoveries. wöhler, h. and g. rose, magnus, gmelin, mitscherlich and others all studied with berzelius. he visited england and france, and was on terms of intimacy and in correspondence with davy, dalton, gay-lussac, berthollet and the other men who at that period shed so much lustre on english and french science. it is said that berzelius was so much pleased with the lectures of dr. marcet at guy's hospital, that on his return from his visit to england in , he introduced much more liveliness and many more experimental illustrations into his own lectures. at the age of thirty-one, berzelius was chosen president of the stockholm academy of sciences; a few years later he was elected a foreign fellow of the royal society, which society bestowed on him the copley medal in . he was raised to the rank of a baron by the king of sweden, being allowed as a special privilege to retain his own name. in the year berzelius resigned his professorship, and in the same year he married. during the remainder of his life, he continued to receive honours of all kinds, but he never for a moment forsook the paths of science. after the death of davy, in , he was recognized as the leading european chemist of his age; but, although firm in his own theoretical views, he was ready to test these views by appealing to nature. the very persistency with which he clung to a conception established on some solid experimental basis insured that new light would be thrown on that conception by the researches of those chemists who opposed him. probably no chemist has added to the science so many carefully determined facts as berzelius; he was always at work in the laboratory, and always worked with the greatest care. yet the appliances at his command were what we should now call poor, meagre, and utterly inadequate. professor wöhler of göttingen, who in the fulness of days and honours has so lately gone from amongst us, recently gave an account of his visit to berzelius in the year . wöhler had taken his degree as doctor of medicine at heidelberg, and being anxious to prosecute the study of chemistry he was advised by his friends to spend a winter in the laboratory of the swedish professor. having written to berzelius and learned that he was willing to allow him working room in his laboratory, the young student set out for stockholm. after a journey to lübeck and a few days' passage in a small sailing-vessel, he arrived in the swedish capital. knocking at the door of the house pointed out as that of berzelius, he tells us that his heart beat hard as the door was opened by a tall man of florid complexion. "it was berzelius himself," he exclaims. scarcely believing that he was in the very room where so many famous discoveries had been made, he entered the laboratory. no water, no gas, no draught-places, no ovens were to be seen; a couple of plain tables, a blowpipe, a few shelves with bottles, a little simple apparatus, and a large water-barrel whereat anna, the ancient cook of the establishment, washed the laboratory dishes, completed the furnishings of this room, famous throughout europe for the work which had been done in it. in the kitchen which adjoined, and where anna cooked, was a small furnace and a sand bath for heating purposes. in this room many great discoveries were made. among these we may note the separation of the element columbium in , and of selenion in ; the discovery of the new earth thoria in ; the elucidation of the properties of yttrium and cerium about , of uranium in , and of the platinum metals in ; the accurate determination of the atomic weights of the greater number of the elements; the discovery of "sulphur salts" in - , and the proof that silica is an acid, and that most of the "stony" minerals are compounds of this acid with various bases. but we shall better learn the value of some of these discoveries by taking a general review of the contributions to chemical science of the man who spent most of his life at work in that room in stockholm. the german chemist richter, in the first or second year of this century, had drawn attention to the fact that when two neutral compounds, such as nitrate of potash and chloride of lime, react chemically, the substances produced by this reaction are also neutral. all the potash combined with nitric acid in one salt changes places with all the lime combined with muriatic acid in the other salt; therefore, said richter, these different quantities of potash and lime are neutralized by the same quantity of nitric acid; and, hence, these amounts of potash and lime are chemically _equivalent_, because these are the amounts which perform the same reaction, viz. neutralization of a fixed quantity of acid. if then careful analyses were made of a number of such neutral compounds as those named, the _equivalents_ of all the commoner "bases" and "acids"[ ] might be calculated. richter's own determinations of the equivalents of acids and bases were not very accurate, but berzelius was impressed with the importance of this work. the year before the appearance of dalton's "new system" (_i.e._ in ), he began to prepare and carefully analyze series of neutral salts. as the work was proceeding he became acquainted with the theory of dalton, and at once saw its extreme importance. for some time berzelius continued to work on the lines laid down by dalton, and to accumulate data from which the atomic weights of elements might be calculated; but he soon perceived--as the founder of the theory had perceived from the very outset--that the fundamental conception of each atom of an element as being a distinct mass of matter weighing more or less than the atom of every other element, and of each atom of a compound as being built up of the atoms of the elements which compose that compound,--berzelius, i say, perceived that these conceptions must remain fruitless unless means were found for determining the number of elementary atoms in each compound atom. we have already learned the rules framed by the founder of the atomic theory for his guidance in attempting to solve this problem. berzelius thought those rules insufficient and arbitrary; he therefore laid down two general rules, on the lines of which he prosecuted his researches into chemical synthesis. "one atom of one element combines with one, two, three, or more atoms of another element." this is practically the same as dalton's definitions of binary, ternary, etc., compounds (p. ). "two atoms of one element combine with three and five atoms of another element." berzelius here recognizes the existence of compound atoms of a more complex structure than any of those recognized by dalton. berzelius further extended the conception of atom by applying it to groups of elements formed, according to him, by the combination of various compound atoms. to his mind every compound atom appeared as built up of two parts; each of these parts might be an elementary atom, or might be itself built up of several elementary atoms, yet in the berzelian theory each acted as a definite whole. so far as the building up of the complex atom went, each of the two parts into which this atom could be divided acted as if it were a simple atom. if we suppose a patch of two shades of red colour to be laid on a smooth surface, and alongside of this a patch of two shades of yellow colour, and if we suppose the whole mass of colour to be viewed from a distance such that one patch appears uniformly red and the other uniformly yellow, we shall have a rough illustration of the berzelian compound atom. to the observer the whole mass of colour appears to consist of two distinct patches of contrasted colours; but let him approach nearer, and he perceives that what appeared to be a uniform surface of red or yellow really consists of two patches of unlike shades of red or of yellow. the whole mass of colour represents the compound atom; broadly it consists of two parts--the red colour represents one of the constituent atoms, the yellow colour represents the other constituent atom; but on closer examination the red atom, so to speak--and likewise the yellow atom--is found to consist of parts which are less unlike each other than the whole red atom is unlike the whole yellow atom. we shall have to consider in more detail the reasoning whereby berzelius arrived at this conception of every compound atom as a _dual_ structure (see pp. - ). at present i wish to notice this conception as lying at the root of most of the work which he did in extending and applying the daltonian theory. i wish to insist on the fact that the atomic theory could not advance without methods being found for determining the number of elementary atoms in a compound atom, without clear conceptions being gained of every compound atom as a structure, and without at least attempts being made to learn the laws in accordance with which that structure was built. before the atomic weight of oxygen could be determined it was necessary that the number of oxygen and of hydrogen atoms in the atom of water should be known; otherwise all that could be stated was, the atomic weight of oxygen is a simple multiple of . berzelius did much to advance chemical science by the introduction and application of a few simple rules whereby he determined the number of elementary atoms in various compound atoms. but as the science advanced, and as more facts came to be known, the berzelian rules were found to be too narrow and too arbitrary; chemists sought for some surer and more generally applicable method than that which berzelius had introduced, and the imperious demand for this method at last forced them to recognize the importance of the great generalization of the italian naturalist avogadro, which they had possessed since the year , but the meaning of which they had so long failed to understand. berzelius made one great step in the direction of recognizing avogadro's distinction between atom and molecule when he accepted gay-lussac's generalization that "equal volumes of gases contain equal numbers of atoms:" but he refused to apply this to other than elementary gases. the weights of the volumes of elementary gases which combined were, for berzelius, also the weights of the atoms of these elements. thus, let the weight of one volume of hydrogen be called , then two volumes of hydrogen, weighing , combine with one volume of oxygen, weighing , to form two volumes of water vapour; therefore, said berzelius, the atom of water consists of two atoms of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen, and the atom of the latter element is sixteen times heavier than the atom of the former. three volumes of hydrogen, weighing , combine with one volume of nitrogen, weighing , to form two volumes of ammonia; therefore, said berzelius, the atom of ammonia consists of three atoms of hydrogen combined with one atom of nitrogen, and the nitrogen atom is fourteen times heavier than the atom of hydrogen. while berzelius was applying these rules to the determination of the atomic weights of the elements, and was conducting the most important series of analyses known in the annals of the science, two great physico-chemical discoveries were announced. in the year the "_law of isomorphism_" was stated by mitscherlich: "compounds the atoms of which contain equal numbers of elementary atoms, similarly arranged, have the same crystalline form." as thus stated, the law of isomorphism affirms that if two compounds crystallize in the same form, the atoms of these compounds are built up of the same number of elementary atoms--however different may be the nature of the elements in the compounds--and that these elementary atoms are similarly arranged. this statement was soon found to be too absolute, and was accordingly modified; but to go into the history of the law of isomorphism would lead us too far from the great main path of chemical advance, the course of which we are seeking to trace. berzelius at once accepted mitscherlich's law, as an aid in his researches on atomic weights. the help to be derived from this law may be illustrated thus: let us assume that two compounds have been obtained exhibiting identity of crystalline form; let it be further assumed that the number of elementary atoms in the atom of one of these compounds is known; it follows, by the law of isomorphism, that the number of elementary atoms in the atom of the other is known also. let the two compounds be _sulphate of potash_ and _chromate of potash_; let it be assumed that the atom of the first named is known to consist of two atoms of potassium, one atom of sulphur, and four atoms of oxygen; and that the second substance is known to be a compound of the elements potassium, chromium and oxygen; then the atom of the second compound contains, by mitscherlich's law, two atoms of potassium, one atom of chromium and four atoms of oxygen: hence the relative weight of the atom of chromate of potash can be determined, and hence the relative weight of the atom of chromium can also be determined. a year after the announcement of mitscherlich's law, the following generalization was stated to hold good, by two french naturalists, dulong and petit:--"the atoms of all solid elements have the same capacity for heat." if the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of one grain of water through one degree be called _one unit of heat_, then the capacity for heat of any body other than water is the number of units of heat required to raise the temperature of one grain of that substance through one degree. each chemical substance, elementary and compound, has its own capacity for heat; but, instead of comparing the capacities for heat of equal weights, dulong and petit compared the capacities for heat of weights representing the weights of the atoms of various elements. thus, equal amounts of heat are required to raise, through the same interval of temperature, fifty-six grains of iron, one hundred and eight grains of silver, and sixty-three and a half grains of copper; but the weights of the atoms of these three elements are in the proportion of : : - / . dulong and petit based their generalization on measurements of the capacities for heat of thirteen elements; further research has shown that their statement most probably holds good for all the solid elements. here then was a most important instrument put into the hands of the chemist. it is only necessary that the atomic weight of one solid element should be certainly known, and that the amount of heat required to raise through one degree the number of grains of that element expressed by its atomic weight should also be known; then the number which expresses the weight, in grains, of any other solid element which is raised through one degree by the same amount of heat, likewise expresses the relative weight of the atom of that element. thus, suppose that the atomic weight of silver is known to be , and suppose that six units of heat are required to raise the temperature of one hundred and eight grains of this metal through one degree; then suppose it is found by experiment that six units of heat suffice to raise the temperature of two hundred and ten grains of bismuth through one degree, it follows--according to the law of dulong and petit--that is the atomic weight of bismuth. the modified generalization of gay-lussac--"equal volumes of _elementary_ gases contain equal numbers of atoms;" the laws of "isomorphism" and of "atomic heat;" and the two empirical rules stated on p. ;--these were the guides used by berzelius in interpreting the analytical results which he and his pupils obtained in that memorable series of researches, whereby the conceptions of dalton were shown to be applicable to a wide range of chemical phenomena. the fixity of composition of chemical compounds has now been established; a definite meaning has been given to the term "element;" the conception of "atom" has been gained, but much remains to be done in the way of rendering this conception precise; and fairly good, but not altogether satisfactory methods have been introduced by which the relative weights of the atoms of elements and compounds may be determined. at this time chemists are busy preparing and describing new compounds, and many new elements are also being discovered; the need of classification begins to be felt more and more. in the days of berzelius and davy strenuous efforts were made to obtain some generalizations by the application of which the many known elements and compounds might be divided into groups. it was felt that a classification might be founded on the composition of compounds, or perhaps on the properties of the same compounds. these two general principles served as guides in most of the researches then instituted; answers were sought to these two questions: of what elements is this compound composed? and, what can this compound do; how does it react towards other bodies? lavoisier, as we know, regarded oxygen as the characteristic element of all _acids_. this term _acid_ implies the possession, by all the substances denoted by it, of some common property; let us shortly trace the history of this word in chemistry. vinegar was known to the greeks and romans, and the names which they gave this substance tell us that sourness was to them its characteristic property. they knew that vinegar effervesced when brought into contact with chalky earths, and that it was able to dissolve many substances--witness the story of cleopatra's draught of the pearl dissolved in vinegar. other substances possessed of these properties--for instance oil of vitriol and spirits of salt--as they became known, were classed along with vinegar; but no attempts were made to clearly define the properties of these bodies till comparatively recent times. the characteristics of an acid substance enumerated by boyle are--solvent power, which is exerted unequally on different bodies; power of turning many vegetable blues to red, and of restoring many vegetable colours which had been destroyed by alkalis; power of precipitating solid sulphur from solutions of this substance in alkalis, and the power of acting on alkalis to produce substances without the properties of either acid or alkali. but what, one may ask, is an alkali, of which mention is so often made by boyle? from very early times it had been noticed that the ashes which remained when certain plants were burned, and the liquid obtained by dissolving those ashes in water, had great cleansing powers; that they removed oily matter, fat and dirt from cloth and other fabrics. the fact that an aqueous solution of these ashes affects the coloured parts of many plants was also noticed in early times. as progress was made in chemical knowledge observers began to contrast the properties of this plant-ash with the properties of acids. the former had no marked taste, the latter were always very sour; the former turned some vegetable reds to blue, the latter turned the blues to red; a solution of plant-ash had no great solvent action on ordinary mineral matter, whereas this matter was generally dissolved by an acid. in the time of the alchemists, who were always seeking for the principles or essences of things, these properties of acids were attributed to _a principle of acidity_, while the properties of plant-ash and substances resembling plant-ash were attributed to a _principle of alkalinity_ (from arabic _alkali_, or _the ash_). in the seventeenth century the distinction between acid and alkali was made the basis of a system of chemical medicine. the two principles of acidity and alkalinity were regarded as engaged in an active and never-ending warfare. every disease was traced to an undue preponderance of one or other of these principles; to keep these unruly principles in quietness became the aim of the physician, and of course it was necessary that the physician should be a chemist, in order that he might know the nature and habits of the principles which gave him so much trouble. up to this time the term "alkali" had been applied to almost any substance having the properties which i have just enumerated; but this group of substances was divided by van helmont and his successors into _fixed alkali_ and _volatile alkali_, and fixed alkali was further subdivided into _mineral alkali_ (what we now call soda) and _vegetable alkali_ (potash). about the same time acids were likewise divided into three groups; _vegetable_, _animal_, and _mineral acids_. to the properties by which alkali was distinguished, viz. cleansing power and action on vegetable colouring matters, stahl (the founder of the phlogistic theory) added that of combining with acids. when an acid (that is, a sour-tasting substance which dissolves most earthy matters and turns vegetable blues to red) is added to an alkali (that is, a substance which feels soap-like to the touch, which does not dissolve many earthy matters, and which turns many vegetable reds to blue) the properties of both acid and alkali disappear, and a new substance is produced which is not characterized by the properties of either constituent. the new substance, as a rule, is without action on earthy matters or on vegetable colours; it is not sour, nor is it soapy to the touch like alkali; it is _neutral_. it is _a salt_. but, although stahl stated that an alkali is a substance which combines with an acid, it was not until a century later that these three--alkali, acid, salt--were clearly distinguished. but the knowledge that a certain group of bodies are sour and dissolve minerals, etc., and that a certain other group of bodies are nearly tasteless and do not dissolve minerals, etc., was evidently a knowledge of only the outlying properties of the bodies; it simply enabled a term to be applied to a group of bodies, which term had a definite connotation. _why_ are acids acid, and _why_ are alkalis alkaline? acids are acid, said becher (latter part of seventeenth century), because they all contain the same principle, viz. the primordial acid. this primordial acid is more or less mixed with earthy matter in all actual acids; it is very pure in spirits of salt. alkalis are alkaline, said basil valentine (beginning of the sixteenth century), because they contain a special kind of matter, "the matter of fire." according to other chemists (_e.g._ j. f. meyer, ), acids owe their acidity to the presence of a sharp or biting principle got from fire. acids, alkalis and salts _all_ contain, according to stahl (beginning of the eighteenth century), more or less _primordial acid_. the more of this a substance contains, the more acid it is; the less of this it contains, the more alkaline it is. all these attempted explanations recognize that similar properties are to be traced to similarity of composition; but the assertion of the existence of a "primordial acid," or of "the matter of fire," although undoubtedly a step in advance, was not sufficiently definite (unless it was supplemented by a distinct account of the properties of these principles) to be accepted when chemical knowledge became accurate. the same general consideration, founded on a large accumulation of facts, viz. that similarity of properties is due to similarity of composition, guided lavoisier in his work on acids. he found the "primordial acid" of stahl, and the "biting principle" of meyer, in the element oxygen. i have already (p. ) shortly traced the reasoning whereby lavoisier arrived at the conclusion that oxygen is _the acid-producer_; here i would insist on the difference between his method and that of basil valentine, stahl and the older chemists. _they_ carried into the domain of natural science conceptions obtained from, and essentially belonging to the domain of metaphysical or extra-physical speculation; _he_ said that oxygen is the acidifier, because all the compounds of this element which he actually examined were possessed of the properties included under the name acid. we know that lavoisier's conclusion was erroneous, that it was not founded on a sufficiently broad basis of facts. the conception of an acidifying principle, although that principle was identified with a known element, was still tainted with the vices of the alchemical school. we shall see immediately how much harm was done by the assertion of lavoisier, "all acids contain oxygen." in chapter ii. (pp. - ) we traced the progress of knowledge regarding alkalis from the time when the properties of these bodies were said to be due to the existence in them of "matter of fire," to the time when black had clearly distinguished and defined caustic alkali and carbonated alkali. the truly philosophical character, and at the same time the want of enthusiasm, of black become apparent if we contrast his work on alkali with that of lavoisier on acid. black did not hamper the advance of chemistry by finding a "principle of alkalinity;" but neither did he give a full explanation of the fact that certain bodies are alkaline while others are not. he set himself the problem of accurately determining the differences in composition between burnt (or caustic) and unburnt (or mild) alkali, and he solved the problem most successfully. he showed that the properties of mild alkalis differ from those of caustic alkalis, because the composition of the former differs from that of the latter; and he showed exactly wherein this difference of composition consists, viz. in the possession or non-possession of fixed air. strange we may say that this discovery did not induce black to prosecute the study of caustic alkalis: surely he would have anticipated davy, and have been known as the discoverer of potassium and sodium. in the time of stahl the name "salt" was applied, as we have learned, to the substance produced by the union of an acid with an alkali; but the same word was used by the alchemists with an altogether different signification. originally applied to the solid matter obtained by boiling down sea-water, and then extended to include all substances which, like this solid matter, are very easily dissolved by water and can be recovered by boiling down this solution, "salt" was, in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the name given to one of the hypothetical principles or elements. many kinds of matter were known to be easily dissolved by water; the common possession of these properties was sought to be accounted for by saying that all these substances contained the same principle, namely, _the principle of salt_. i have already tried to indicate the reasoning whereby boyle did so much to overthrow this conception of salt. he also extended our knowledge of special substances which are now classed as salts. the chemists who came after boyle gradually reverted to the older meaning of the term "salt," adopting as the characteristics of all substances placed in this class, ready solubility in water, fusibility, or sometimes volatility, and the possession of a taste more or less like that of sea-salt. substances which resembled salts in general appearance, but were insoluble in water, and very fixed in the fire, were called "earths"; and, as was generally done in those days, the existence of a primordial earth was assumed, more or less of which was supposed to be present in actual earths. this recognition of the possibility of more or less of the primordial earth being present in actually occurring earths, of course necessitated the existence of various kinds of earth. the earths were gradually distinguished from each other; lime was recognized as a substance distinct from baryta, baryta as distinct from alumina, etc. stahl taught that one essential property of an earth was fusibility by fire, with production of a substance more or less like glass. this property was possessed in a remarkable degree by quartz or silica. hence silica was regarded as the typical earth, until berzelius, in , proved it to be an acid. but the earths resembled alkalis, inasmuch as they too combined with, and so neutralized, acids. there is an alkali hidden in every earth, said some chemists. an alkali is an earth refined by the presence of acid and combustible matter, said others. earths thus came to be included in the term "alkali," when that term was used in its widest acceptation. but a little later it was found that some of the earths were thrown down in the solid form from their solutions in acids by the addition of alkalis; this led to a threefold division, thus-- earths <----> alkaline earths <----> alkalis insoluble somewhat soluble very soluble in in water. in water. water. the distinction at first drawn between "earth" and "alkali" was too absolute; the intermediate group of "alkaline earths" served to bridge over the gap between the extreme groups. "in nature," says wordsworth, "everything is distinct, but nothing defined into absolute independent singleness." at this stage of advance, then, an earth is regarded as differing from an alkali in being insoluble, or nearly insoluble in water; in not being soapy to the touch, and not turning vegetable reds to blue: but as resembling an alkali, in that it combines with and neutralizes an acid; and the product of this neutralization, whether accomplished by an alkali or by an earth, is called a salt. to the earth or alkali, as being the foundation on which the salt is built, by the addition of acid, the name of _base_ was given by rouelle in . but running through every conception which was formed of these substances--acid, alkali, earth, salt--we find a tendency, sometimes forcibly marked, sometimes feebly indicated, but always present, to consider salt as a term of much wider acceptation than any of the others. an acid and an alkali, or an acid and an earth, combine to form a salt; but the salt could not have been thus produced unless the acid, the alkali and the earth had contained in themselves some properties which, when combined, form the properties of the salt. the acid, the alkali, the earth, each is, in a sense, a salt. the perfect salt is produced by the coalescence of the saltness of the acid with the saltness of the alkali. this conception finds full utterance in the names, once in common use, of _sal acidum_ for acid, _sal alkali_ for alkali, and _sal salsum_ or _sal neutrum_ for salt. all are salts; at one extreme comes that salt which is marked by properties called acid properties, at the other extreme comes the salt distinguished by alkaline properties, and between these, and formed by the union of these, comes the middle or neutral salt. it is thus that the nomenclature of chemistry marks the advances made in the science. "what's in a name?" to the historical student of science, almost everything. we shall find how different is the meaning attached in modern chemistry to these terms, _acid salt_, _alkaline salt_, _neutral salt_, from that which our predecessors gave to their _sal acidum_, _sal alkali_, and _sal neutrum_. we must note the appearance of the term _vitriol_, applied to the solid salt-like bodies obtained from acids and characterized by a glassy lustre. by the middle of last century the vitriols were recognized as all derived from, or compounded of, sulphuric acid (oil of vitriol) and metals; this led to a subdivision of the large class of neutral salts into ( ) metallic salts produced by the action of sulphuric acid on metals, and ( ) neutral salts produced by the action of earths or alkalis on acids generally. to rouelle, a predecessor of lavoisier, who died four years before the discovery of oxygen, we owe many accurate and suggestive remarks and experiments bearing on the term "salt." i have already mentioned that it was he who applied the word "base" to the alkali or earth, or it might be metal, from which, by the action of acid, a salt is built up. he also ceased to speak of an acid as _sal acidum_, or of an alkali as _sal alkali_, and applied the term "salt" exclusively to those substances which are produced by the action of acids on bases. when the product of such an action was neutral--that is, had no sour taste, no soapy feeling to the touch, no action on vegetable colours, and no action on acids or bases--he called that product _a neutral salt_; when the product still exhibited some of the properties of acid, _e.g._ sourness of taste, he called it _an acid salt_; and when the product continued to exhibit some of the properties of alkali, _e.g._ turned vegetable reds to blue, he called it _an alkaline salt_. rouelle also proved experimentally that an acid salt contains more acid--relatively to the same amount of base--than a neutral salt, and that an alkaline salt contains more base--relatively to the same amount of acid--than a neutral salt; and he proved that this excess of acid, or of base, is chemically united to the rest of the salt--is, in other words, an essential part of the salt, from which it cannot be removed without changing the properties of the whole. but we have not as yet got to know why certain qualities connoted by the term "acid" can be affirmed to belong to a group of bodies, why certain other, "alkaline," properties belong to another group, nor why a third group can be distinguished from both of these by the possession of properties which we sum up in the term "earthy." surely there must be some peculiarity in the composition of these substances, common to all, by virtue of which all are acid. the atom of an acid is surely composed of certain elements which are never found in the atom of an alkali or an earth; or perhaps the difference lies in the number, rather than in the nature of the elements in the acid atoms, or even in the arrangement of the elementary atoms in the compound atom of acid, of alkali, and of earth. i think that our knowledge of salt is now more complete than our knowledge of either acid, alkali, or earth. we know that a salt is formed by the union of an acid and an alkali or earth; if, then, we get to know the composition of acids and bases (_i.e._ alkalis and earths), we shall be well on the way towards knowing the composition of salts. and now we must resume our story where we left it at p. . lavoisier had recognized oxygen as the acidifier; black had proved that a caustic alkali does not contain carbonic acid. up to this time metallic calces, and for the most part alkalis and earths also, had been regarded as elementary substances. lavoisier however proved calces to be compounds of metals and oxygen; but as some of those calces had all the properties which characterized earths, it seemed probable that all earths are metallic oxides, and if all earths, most likely all alkalis also. many attempts were made to decompose earths and alkalis, and to obtain the metal, the oxide of which the earth or the alkali was supposed to be. one chemist thought he had obtained a metal by heating the earth baryta with charcoal, but from the properties of his metal we know that he had not worked with a pure specimen of baryta, and that his supposed metallic base of baryta was simply a little iron or other metal, previously present in the baryta, or charcoal, or crucible which he employed. but if lavoisier's view were correct--if all bases contained oxygen--it followed that all salts are oxygen compounds. acids all contain oxygen, said lavoisier; this was soon regarded as one of the fundamental facts of chemistry. earths and alkalis are probably oxides of metals; this before long became an article of faith with all orthodox chemists. salts are produced by the union of acids and bases, therefore all salts contain oxygen: the conclusion was readily adopted by almost every one. when the controversy between lavoisier and the phlogistic chemists was at its height, the followers of stahl had taunted lavoisier with being unable to explain the production of hydrogen (or phlogiston as they thought) during the solution of metals in acids; but when lavoisier learned the composition of water, he had an answer sufficient to quell these taunts. the metal, said lavoisier, decomposes the water which is always present along with the acid, hydrogen is thus evolved, and the metallic calx or oxide so produced dissolves in the acid and forms a salt. if this explanation were correct--and there was an immense mass of evidence in its favour and apparently none against it--then all the salts produced by the action of acids on metals necessarily contained oxygen. the lavoisierian view of a salt, as a compound of a metallic oxide--or base--with a non-metallic oxide--or acid--seemed the only explanation which could be accepted by any reasonable chemist: in the early years of this century it reigned supreme. but even during the lifetime of its founder this theory was opposed and opposed by the logic of facts. in berthollet published an account of experiments on prussic acid,--the existence and preparation (from prussian blue) of which acid had been demonstrated three or four years before by the swedish chemist scheele--which led him to conclude this compound to be a true acid, but free from oxygen. in the same chemist studied the composition and properties of sulphuretted hydrogen, and pronounced this body to be an acid containing no oxygen. but the experiments and reasoning of berthollet were hidden by the masses of facts and the cogency of argument of the lavoisierian chemists. the prevalent views regarding acids and bases were greatly strengthened by the earlier researches of sir humphry davy, in which he employed the voltaic battery as an instrument in chemical investigation. let us now consider some of the electro-chemical work of this brilliant chemist. in the spring of the year the electrical battery, which had recently been discovered by volta, was applied by nicholson and carlisle to effect the decomposition of water. the experiments of these naturalists were repeated and confirmed by davy, then resident at bristol, who followed up this application of electricity to effect chemical changes by a series of experiments extending from to , and culminating in the bakerian lecture delivered before the royal society in the latter year. the history of davy's life during these years, years rich in results of the utmost importance to chemical science, will be traced in the sequel; meanwhile we are concerned only with the results of his chemical work. the first bakerian lecture of humphry davy, "on some chemical agencies of electricity," deserves the careful study of all who are interested in the methods of natural science; it is a brilliant example of the disentanglement of a complex natural problem. volta and others had subjected water to the action of a current of electricity, and had noticed the appearance of acid and alkali at the oppositely electrified metallic surfaces. according to some experimenters, the acid was nitrous, according to others, muriatic acid. one chemist asserted the production of a new and peculiar body which he called _the electric acid_. the alkali was generally said to be ammonia. when davy passed an electric current through distilled water contained in glass vessels, connected by pieces of moist bladder, cotton fibre, or other vegetable matters, he found that nitric and hydrochloric acids were formed in the water surrounding the positively electrified plate or pole, and soda around the negatively electrified pole, of the battery. when the same piece of cotton fibre was repeatedly used for making connection between the glass vessels, and was washed each time in dilute nitric acid, davy found that the production of muriatic acid gradually ceased; hence he traced the formation of this acid to the presence of the animal or vegetable substance used in the experiments. finding that the glass vessels were somewhat corroded, and that the greater the amount of corrosion the greater was the amount of soda making its appearance around the negative pole, he concluded that the soda was probably a product of the decomposition of the glass by the electric current; he therefore modified the experiment. he passed an electric current through distilled water contained in small cups of agate, previously cleaned by boiling in distilled water for several hours, and connected by threads of the mineral asbestos, chosen as being quite free from vegetable matter; alkali and acid were still produced. the experiment was repeated several times with the same apparatus; acid and alkali were still produced, but the alkali decreased each time. the only conclusion to be drawn was that the alkali came from the water employed. two small cups of gold were now used to contain the water; a very small amount of alkali appeared at the negative pole, and a little nitric acid at the positive pole. the quantity of acid slowly increased as the experiment continued, whereas the quantity of alkali remained the same as after a few minutes' action of the electric current. the production of alkali is probably due, said davy, to the presence in the water of some substance which is not removed by distillation in a glass retort. by boiling down in a silver dish a quantity of the water he had used, a very small amount of solid matter was obtained, which after being heated was distinctly alkaline. moreover when a little of this solid matter was added to the water contained in the two golden cups, there was a sudden and marked increase in the amount of alkali formed around the negative pole. another quantity of the water which he had used was again distilled in a silver retort, and a little of the distillate was subjected to electrolysis as before. no alkali appeared. a little piece of glass was placed in the water; alkali quickly began to form. davy thus conclusively proved that the alkali produced during the electrolysis (_i.e._ decomposition by the electric current) of water is not derived from the water itself, but from mineral impurities contained in the water, or in the vessel in which the water is placed during the experiment. but the production of nitric acid around the positive pole was yet to be accounted for. before further experiments could be made it was necessary that davy should form an hypothesis--that he should mentally connect the appearance of the nitric acid with some other phenomenon sufficient to produce this appearance; he could then devise experiments which would determine whether the connection supposed to exist between the two phenomena really did exist or not. now, of the constituents of nitric acid--nitrogen, hydrogen and oxygen--all except the first named are present in pure water; nitrogen is present in large quantity in the ordinary atmosphere. it was only necessary to assume that some of the hydrogen and oxygen produced during the electrolysis of water seized on and combined with some of the nitrogen in the air which surrounded that water, and the continual production of nitric acid during the whole process of electrolysis was explained. but how was this assumption to be proved or disproved? davy adopted a method frequently made use of in scientific investigations:--remove the assumed cause of a phenomenon; if the phenomenon ceases to be produced, the assumed cause is probably the real cause. davy surrounded the little gold cups containing the water to be electrolysed with a glass jar which he connected with an air-pump; he exhausted most of the air from the jar and then passed the electric current through the water. very little nitric acid appeared. he now again took out most of the air from the glass jar, admitted some hydrogen to supply its place, and again pumped this out. this process he repeated two or three times and then passed the electric current. _no_ acid appeared in the water. he admitted air into the glass vessel; nitric acid began to be produced. thus he proved that whenever air was present in contact with the water being electrolysed, nitric acid made its appearance, and when the air was wholly removed the acid ceased to be produced. as he had previously shown that the production of this acid was not to be traced to impurities in the water, to the nature of the vessel used to contain the water, or to the nature of the material of which the poles of the battery were composed, the conclusion was forced upon him that the production of nitric acid in the water, and the presence of ordinary air around the water invariably existed together; that if one of these conditions was present, the other was also present--in other words, that one was the cause of the other. the result of this exhaustive and brilliant piece of work is summed up by davy in these words: "it seems evident then that water, chemically pure, is decomposed by electricity into gaseous matter alone, into oxygen and hydrogen." from the effects of the electric current on glass, davy argued that other earthy compounds would probably undergo change under similar conditions. he therefore had little cups of gypsum made, in which he placed pure water, and passed an electric current through the liquid. lime was formed around the negative, and sulphuric acid around the positive pole. using similar apparatus, he proved that the electric current decomposes very many minerals into an earthy or alkaline base and an acid. picturing to himself the little particles of a salt as being split by the electric current each into two smaller particles, one possessed of acid and the other of alkaline properties, davy thought it might be possible to intercept the progress of these smaller particles, which he saw ever travelling towards the positive and negative poles of the battery. he accordingly connected these small glass vessels by threads of washed asbestos; in one of the outer vessels he placed pure water, in the other an aqueous solution of sulphate of potash, and in the central vessel he placed ammonia. the negative pole of the battery being immersed in the sulphate of potash, and the positive pole in the water, it was necessary for the particles of sulphuric acid--produced by the decomposition of the sulphate of potash--to travel through the ammonia in the central vessel before they could find their way to the positive pole. now, ammonia and sulphuric acid cannot exist in contact--they instantly combine to form sulphate of ammonia; the sulphuric acid particles ought therefore to be arrested by the ammonia. but the sulphuric acid made its appearance at the positive pole just as if the central vessel had contained water. it seemed that the mutual attraction ordinarily exerted between sulphuric acid and ammonia was overcome by the action of the electric current. ammonia would generally present an insuperable barrier to the progress of sulphuric acid, but the electrical energy appeared to force the acid particles over this barrier; they passed towards their goal as if nothing stood in their way. experiments are now multiplied by davy, and the general conclusion drawn is that "hydrogen, the alkaline substances, the metals and certain metallic oxides are attracted by negatively electrified metallic surfaces, and repelled by positively electrified metallic surfaces; and contrariwise, that oxygen and acid substances are attracted by positively electrified metallic surfaces, and repelled by negatively electrified metallic surfaces; and these attractive and repulsive forces are sufficiently energetic to destroy or suspend the usual operation of chemical affinity."[ ] to account for this apparent suspension of the ordinary chemical laws, davy supposes that chemical compounds are continually decomposed and re-formed throughout the liquid which is subjected to the electrical action. thus, in the experiment with water, ammonia and sulphate of potash, he supposes that the sulphuric acid and ammonia do combine in the central vessel to form sulphate of ammonia, but that this compound is again decomposed, by the electrical energy, into sulphuric acid--which passes on towards the positive pole--and ammonia--which remains in the central vessel--ready to combine with more sulphuric acid as that comes travelling onwards from its source in the vessel containing sulphate of potash to its goal in the vessel containing water. the eye of the philosopher had pierced beneath the apparent stability of the chemical systems which he studied. to his vision there appeared in those few drops of water and ammonia and sulphate of potash a never-ceasing conflict of contending forces; there appeared a continual shattering and rebuilding of the particles of which the masses were composed. the whole was at rest, the parts were in motion; the whole was constant in chemical composition, the composition of each particle was changed a thousand times in the minutest portion of every second. to the mind of davy, the electrolysis of every chemical compound was a new application of the great law established by newton--"to every action there is an equal and opposite reaction." each step made in chemical science since davy's time has but served to emphasize the universality of this principle of action and reaction, a principle which has been too much overlooked in the chemical text-books, but the importance of which recent researches are beginning to impress on the minds of chemists. it is the privilege of the philosophic student of nature to penetrate the veil with which she conceals her secrets from the vulgar gaze. to him are shown sights which "eye hath not seen," and by him are perceived sounds which "ear hath not heard." each drop of water is seen by him not only to be built up of myriads of small parts, but each particle is seen to be in motion; many particles are being decomposed into still smaller particles of matter, different in properties from the original particles, but as the original particles are at the same time being reproduced, the continued existence of the drop of water with the properties of water is to him the result of the mutual action and reaction of contending forces. he knows that rest and permanence are gained, not by the cessation of action, but by the continuance of conflict; he knows that in the realm of natural phenomena, stable equilibrium is the resultant of the action of opposite forces, and that complete decomposition occurs only when one force becomes too powerful or another becomes too weak. pursuing the train of thought initiated by the experiments which i have described, davy entered upon a series of researches which led him to consider every chemical substance as possessing definite electrical relations towards every other substance. "as chemical attraction between two bodies seems to be destroyed by giving one of them an electrical state different from that which it naturally possessed--that is, by bringing it into a state similar to the other--so it may be increased by exalting its natural energy." thus zinc, a metal easily oxidized, does not combine with oxygen when negatively electrified, whereas silver, a metal oxidized with difficulty, readily combines with oxygen when positively electrified. substances in opposite electrical states appear to combine chemically, and the greater the electrical difference the greater the readiness with which chemical combination is effected. electrical energy and chemical attraction or _affinity_ are evidently closely connected; perhaps, said davy, they are both results of the same cause. thus davy arrived at the conception of a system of bodies as maintained in equilibrium by the mutual actions and reactions of both chemical and electrical forces; by increasing either of these a change is necessarily produced in the other. under certain electrical conditions the bodies will exert no chemical action on one another, but such action may be started by changing these electrical conditions, or, on the other hand, by changes in the chemical relations of the bodies a change in the electrical relations may be induced. thus davy found that if plates of copper and sulphur are heated, the copper exhibits a positive and the sulphur a negative electrical condition; that these electrical states become more marked as temperature rises, until the melting point of sulphur is reached, when the copper and sulphur combine together chemically and produce sulphide of copper. when water is electrolysed, davy looked on the oppositely electrified metallic plates in the battery as striving to attain a state of equilibrium; the negatively electrified zinc strives to gain positive electricity from the copper, which strives to gain negative electricity from the zinc. the water he regarded as the carrier of these electricities, the one in this direction, the other in that. in thus acting as a carrier, the water is itself chemically decomposed, with production of hydrogen and oxygen; but this chemical rearrangement of some of the substances which composed the original system (of battery and water) involves a fresh disturbance of electrical energy, and so the process proceeds until the whole of the water is decomposed or the whole of the copper or zinc plate is dissolved in the battery. if the water were not chemically decomposed, davy thought that the zinc and copper in the battery would quickly attain the state of electrical equilibrium towards which they continually strive, and that the current would therefore quickly cease. davy thought that "however strong the natural electrical energies of the elements of bodies may be, yet there is every probability of a limit to their strength; whereas the powers of our artificial instruments seem capable of indefinite increase." by making use of a very powerful battery, he hoped to be able to decompose substances generally regarded as simple bodies. taking a wide survey of natural phenomena, he sees these two forces, which we call chemical and electrical, everywhere at work, and by their mutual actions upholding the material universe in equilibrium. in the outbreaks of volcanoes he sees the disturbance of this equilibrium by the undue preponderance of electrical force; and in the formation of complex minerals beneath the surface of the earth, he traces the action of those chemical attractions which are ever ready to bring about the combination of elements, if they are not held in check by the opposing influence of electrical energy. we shall see how the great and philosophical conception of davy was used by berzelius, and how, while undoubtedly gaining in precision, it lost much in breadth in being made the basis of a rigid system of chemical classification. davy's hope that the new instrument of research placed in the hands of chemists by volta would be used in the decomposition of supposed simple substances was soon to be realized. a year after the lecture "on some chemical agencies of electricity," davy was again the reader of the bakerian lecture; this year ( ) it was entitled, "on some new phenomena of chemical change produced by electricity, particularly the decomposition of the fixed alkalis; and the exhibition of the new substances which constitute their bases; and on the general nature of alkaline bodies." in his first experiments on the effect of the electrical current on potash and soda, davy used strong aqueous solutions of these alkalis, with the result that hydrogen and oxygen only were evolved. he then passed the current through melted potash kept liquid during the operation by the use of a spirit-lamp, the flame of which was fed with oxygen. much light was evolved, and a great flame appeared at the negative pole; on changing the direction of the current, "aeriform globules, which inflamed in the air, rose through the potash." on the th of october , a piece of potash was placed on a disc of platinum, which was made the negative pole of a very powerful battery; a platinum wire brought into contact with the upper surface of the potash served as the positive pole. when the current was passed, the potash became hot and soon melted; gas was evolved at the upper surface, and at the lower (negative) side "there was no liberation of elastic fluid, but small globules, having a high metallic lustre, and being precisely similar in visible characters to quicksilver appeared, some of which burst with explosion and bright flame as soon as they were formed, and others remained, and were merely tarnished, and finally covered by a white film which formed on their surfaces." when davy saw these metallic globules burst through the crust of fusing potash, we are told by one of his biographers, "he could not contain his joy, he actually bounded about the room in ecstatic delight; and some little time was required for him to compose himself sufficiently to continue the experiment." this was the culminating point of the researches in which he had been continuously engaged for about six years. his interest and excitement were intense; the bakerian lecture was written "on the spur of the occasion, before the excitement of the mind had subsided," yet, says his biographer--and we may well agree with him--"yet it bears proof only of the maturest judgment; the greater part of it is as remarkable for experimental accuracy as for logical precision." but "to every action there is an equal and opposite reaction:" immediately after the delivery of the lecture, davy was prostrated by a severe attack of illness, which confined him to bed for nine weeks, and was very nearly proving fatal. that the phenomenon just described was really the decomposition of potash, and the production of the metal of which this substance is an oxygenized compound, was proved by obtaining similar results whether plates of silver, copper, or gold, or vessels of plumbago, or even charcoal, were used to contain the potash, or whether the experiment was conducted in the air, or in a glass vessel from which air had been exhausted, or in glass tubes wherein the potash was confined by mercury. the decomposition of potash was followed within a few days by that of soda, from which substance metallic globules were obtained which took fire when exposed to the air. but the analysis of potash and soda was not sufficient for davy; he determined to accomplish the synthesis of these substances. for this purpose he collected small quantities of the newly discovered metals, by conducting the electrolysis of potash and soda under experimental conditions such that the metals, as soon as produced, were plunged under the surface of naphtha, a liquid which does not contain oxygen, and which protected them from the action of the surrounding air. a weighed quantity of each metal was then heated in a stream of pure dry oxygen, the products were collected and weighed, and it was found that solutions of these products in water possessed all the properties of aqueous solutions of potash and soda. the new metals were now obtained in larger quantity by davy, and their properties carefully determined by him; they were named _potassium_ and _sodium_ respectively. they were shown to possess all those properties which were generally accepted as characteristic of metal, except that of being heavy. the new metals were extremely light, lighter than water. for some time it was difficult to convince all chemists that a metal could be a very light substance. we are assured that a friend of davy, who was shown potassium for the first time, and was asked what kind of substance he supposed it to be, replied, "it is metallic, to be sure;" "and then, balancing it on his finger, he added in a tone of confidence, 'bless me, how heavy it is!'" davy argued that since the alkalis, potash and soda, were found to be oxygen compounds of metals, the earths would probably also be found to be metallic oxides. in the year he succeeded in decomposing the three earths, lime, baryta and strontia, and in obtaining the metals _calcium_, _barium_ and _strontium_, but not in a perfectly pure condition, or in any quantity. he also got evidence of the decomposition of the earths silica, alumina, zirconia and beryllia, by the action of powerful electric currents, but he did not succeed in obtaining the supposed metallic bases of these substances. so far davy's discoveries had all tended to confirm the generally accepted view which regarded alkalis and earths as metallic oxides. but we found that the outcome of these views was to regard all salts--and among these, of course, common salt--as oxygen compounds.[ ] acids were oxygen compounds, bases were oxygen compounds, and as salts were produced by the union of acids with bases, they, too, must necessarily be oxygen compounds. berthollet had thrown doubt on the universality of lavoisier's name "oxygen," _the_ acidifier, but he had not conclusively proved the existence of any acid which did not contain oxygen. the researches of davy naturally led him to consider the prevalent views regarding acids, bases and salts. muriatic (or as we now call it hydrochloric) acid had long been a stumbling-block to the thorough-going lavoisierian chemists. oxygen could not be detected in it, yet it ought to contain oxygen, because oxygen is the acidifier. of course, if muriatic acid contains oxygen, the salts--muriates--produced by the action of this acid on alkalis and earths must also contain oxygen. many years before this time the action of muriatic acid on manganese ore had been studied by the swedish chemist scheele, who had thus obtained a yellow-coloured gas with a very strong smell. berthollet had shown that when a solution of this gas in water is exposed to sunlight, oxygen is evolved and muriatic acid is produced. the yellow gas was therefore supposed to be, and was called, "oxidized muriatic acid," and muriatic acid was itself regarded as composed of oxygen and an unknown substance or _radicle_. in gay-lussac and thenard found that one volume of hydrogen united with one volume of the so-called oxidized muriatic acid to form muriatic acid; the presence of hydrogen in this acid was therefore proved. when davy began ( - ) to turn his attention specially to the study of salts, he adopted the generally accepted view that muriatic acid is a compound of oxygen and an unknown radicle, and that by the addition of oxygen to this compound oxidized muriatic acid is produced. but unless davy could prove the presence of oxygen in muriatic acid he could not long hold the opinion that oxygen was really a constituent of this substance. he tried to obtain direct evidence of the presence of oxygen, but failed. he then set about comparing the action of muriatic acid on metals and metallic oxides with the action of the so-called oxidized muriatic acid on the same substances. he showed that salt-like compounds were produced by the action of oxidized muriatic acid either on metals or on the oxides of these metals, oxygen being evolved in the latter cases; and that the same compounds and water were produced by the action of muriatic acid on the same metallic oxides. these results were most easily and readily explained by assuming the so-called oxidized muriatic acid to be an elementary substance, and muriatic acid to be a compound of this element with hydrogen. to the new element thus discovered--for he who establishes the elementary nature of a substance may almost be regarded as its discoverer--davy gave the name of _chlorine_, suggested by the yellow colour of the gas (from greek, = _yellow_). he at once began to study the analogies of chlorine, to find by experiment which elements it resembled, and so to classify it. many metals, he found, combined readily with chlorine, with evolution of heat and light. it acted, like oxygen, as a supporter of combustion; it was, like oxygen, attracted towards the negative pole of the voltaic battery; its compound with hydrogen was an acid; hence said davy chlorine, like oxygen, is a supporter of combustion and also an acidifier. but it was very hard to get chemists to adopt these views. as bacon says, "if false facts in nature be once on foot, what through neglect of examination, the countenance of antiquity, and the use made of them in discourse, they are scarce ever retracted." chemists had long been accustomed to systems which pretended to explain all chemical facts. the phlogistic theory, which had tyrannized over chemistry, had been succeeded by the lavoisierian chemistry, which recognized one acidifier, and this also the one supporter of combustion. to ascribe these properties to any element other than oxygen appeared almost profane. but when davy spoke of chlorine as an acidifier, he did not use this word in the same sense as that in which it was employed by the upholders of the oxygen theory of acids; he simply meant to express the fact that a compound containing chlorine as one of its constituents, but not containing oxygen, was a true acid. when gay-lussac attempted to prove that hydrogen is an _alkalizing principle_, davy said, "this is an attempt to introduce into chemistry a doctrine of occult qualities, and to refer to some mysterious and inexplicable energy what must depend upon a peculiar corpuscular arrangement." and with regard to gay-lussac's strained use of analogies between hydrogen compounds and alkalis, he says, "the substitution of analogy for fact is the bane of chemical philosophy; the legitimate use of analogy is to connect facts together, and to guide to new experiments." but davy's facts were so well established, and his experiments so convincing, that before two or three years had passed, most chemists were persuaded that chlorine was an element--_i.e._ a substance which had never been decomposed--and that muriatic acid was a compound of this element with hydrogen. berzelius was among the last to adopt the new view. wöhler tells us that in the winter of , when he was working in the laboratory of berzelius, anna, while washing some basins, remarked that they smelt strongly of oxidized muriatic acid: "now," said berzelius, "listen to me, anna. thou must no longer say 'oxidized muriatic acid,' but 'chlorine;' that is better." this work on chlorine was followed up, in , by the proof that the class of acidifiers and supporters of combustion contains a third elementary substance, viz. iodine. as davy's views regarding acids and salts became developed, he seems to have more and more opposed the assumption that any one element is especially to be regarded as the acidifying element; but at the same time he seems to admit that most, if not all, acids contain hydrogen. such oxides as sulphur trioxide, nitrogen pentoxide, etc., do not possess acid properties except in combination with water. but he of course did not say that all hydrogen compounds are acids; he rather regarded the possession by a substance of acid properties as dependent, to a great extent, on the nature of the elements other than hydrogen which it contained, or perhaps on the arrangement of all the elements in the particles of the acid. he regarded the hydrogen in an acid as capable of replacement by a metal, and to the metallic derivative--as it might be called--of the acid, thus produced, he gave the name of "salt." an acid might therefore be a compound of hydrogen with one other element--such were hydrochloric, hydriodic, hydrofluoric acids--or it might be a compound of hydrogen with two or more elements, of which one might or might not be oxygen--such were hydrocyanic acid and chloric or nitric acid. if the hydrogen in any of these acids were replaced by a metal a salt would be produced. a salt might therefore contain no oxygen, _e.g._ chloride or iodide of potassium; but in most cases salts did contain oxygen, _e.g._ chlorate or nitrate of potassium. acids were thus divided into oxyacids (or acids which contain oxygen) and acids containing no oxygen; the former class including most of the known acids. the old view of salts as being compounds of acids (_i.e._ oxides of the non-metallic elements) and bases (_i.e._ oxides of metals) was overthrown, and salts came to be regarded as metallic derivatives of acids. from this time, these terms--acids, salts, bases--become of less importance than they formerly were in the history of chemical advance. in trying to explain davy's electro-chemical theory i have applied the word _affinity_ to the mutual action and reaction between two substances which combine together to form a chemical compound. it is now necessary that we should look a little more closely into the history of this word _affinity_. oil and water do not mix together, but oil and potash solution do; the former may be said not to have, and the latter to have, an affinity one for the other. when sulphur is heated, the yellow odourless solid, seizing upon oxygen in the air, combines with it to produce a colourless strongly smelling gas. sulphur and oxygen are said to have strong affinity for each other. if equal weights of lime and magnesia be thrown into diluted nitric acid, after a time it is found that some of the lime, but very little of the magnesia, is dissolved. if an aqueous solution of lime be added to a solution of magnesia in nitric acid, the magnesia is precipitated in the form of an insoluble powder, while the lime remains dissolved in the acid. it is said that lime has a stronger affinity for nitric acid than magnesia has. such reactions as these used to be cited as examples of _single elective affinity_--single, because one substance combined with one other, and elective, because a substance seemed to choose between two others presented to it, and to combine with one to the exclusion of the other. but if a neutral solution of magnesia in sulphuric acid is added to a neutral solution of lime in nitric acid, sulphate of lime and nitrate of magnesia are produced. the lime, it was said, leaves the nitric and goes to the sulphuric acid, which, having been deserted by the magnesia, is ready to receive it; at the same time the nitric acid from which the lime has departed combines with the magnesia formerly held by the sulphuric acid. such a reaction was said to be an instance of _double affinities_. the chemical changes were caused, it was said, by the simultaneous affinity of lime for sulphuric acid, which was greater than its affinity for nitric acid, and the affinity of magnesia for nitric acid, which was greater than its affinity for sulphuric acid. if a number of salts were mixed, each base--supposing the foregoing statements to be correct--would form a compound with that acid for which it had the greatest affinity. it should then be possible to draw up tables of affinity. such tables were indeed prepared. here is an example:-- _sulphuric acid._ baryta. lime. strontia. ammonia. potash. magnesia. soda. this table tells us that the affinity of baryta for sulphuric acid is greater than that of strontia for the same acid, that of strontia greater than that of potash, and so on. it also tells that potash will decompose a compound of sulphuric acid and soda, just as soda will decompose a compound of the same acid with lime, or strontia will decompose a compound with potash, etc. but berthollet showed in the early years of this century that a large quantity of a body having a weak affinity for another will suffice to decompose a small quantity of a compound of this other with a third body for which it has a strong affinity. he showed, that is, that the formation or non-formation of a compound is dependent not only on the so-called affinities between the constituents, but also on the relative quantities of these constituents. berthollet and other chemists also showed that affinity is much conditioned by temperature; that is, that two substances which show no tendency towards chemical union at a low temperature may combine when the temperature is raised. he, and they, also proved that the formation or non-formation of a compound is much influenced by its physical properties. thus, if two substances are mixed in solution, and if by their mutual action a substance can be produced which is insoluble in the liquids present, that substance is generally produced whether the affinity between the original pair of substances be strong or weak. the outcome of berthollet's work was that tables of affinity became almost valueless. to say that the affinity of this body for that was greater than its affinity for a third body was going beyond the facts, because the formation of this or that compound depended on many conditions much more complex than those connoted by the term "affinity." yet the conception of affinity remained, although it could not be applied in so rigorous a way as had been done by the earlier chemists. if an element, a, readily combines with another element, b, under certain physical conditions, but does not, under the same conditions, combine with a third element, c, it may still be said that a and b have, and a and c have not, an affinity for each other. this general conception of affinity was applied by berzelius to the atoms of elements. affinity, said berzelius, acts between unlike atoms, and causes them to unite to form a compound atom, unlike either of the original atoms; cohesion, on the other hand, acts between like atoms, causing them to hold together without producing any change in their properties. affinity varies in different elements. thus the affinity of gold for oxygen is very small; hence it is that gold is found in the earth in the metallic state, while iron, having a great affinity for oxygen, soon rusts when exposed to air, or when buried in the earth. potassium and sodium have great affinities for oxygen, chlorine, etc.; yet the atoms of potassium and sodium do not themselves combine. the more any elements are alike chemically the smaller is their affinity for each other; the more any elements are chemically unlike the greater is their mutual affinity; but this affinity is modified by circumstances. thus, said berzelius, if equal numbers of atoms of a and b, having equal or nearly equal affinity for c, mutually react, compound atoms, ac and bc, will be produced, but atoms of a and b will remain. the amounts of ac and bc produced will be influenced by the greater or less affinity of a and b for c; but if there be a greater number of a than of b atoms, a greater amount of ac than of bc will be produced. in these cases all the reacting substances and the products of the actions are supposed to be liquids; but bc, if a solid substance, will be produced even if the affinity of a for c is greater than that of b for c. in some elements, berzelius taught, affinity slumbers, and can be awakened only by raising the temperature. thus carbon in the form of coal has no affinity for oxygen at ordinary temperatures; it has remained for ages in the earth without undergoing oxidation; but when coal is heated the affinities of carbon are awakened, combination with oxygen occurs, and heat is produced. but why is it that certain elementary atoms exhibit affinity for certain others? it depends, said berzelius, on the electrical states of these atoms. according to the berzelian theory, every elementary atom has attached to it a certain quantity of electricity, part of which is positive and part negative. this electricity is accumulated at two points on each atom, called respectively the positive pole and the negative pole; but in each atom one of these electricities so much preponderates over the other as to give the whole atom the character of either a positively or a negatively electrified body. when two atoms combine chemically the positive electricity in one neutralizes the negative electricity in the other. as we know that similar electricities repel, and opposite electricities attract each other, it follows that a markedly positive atom will exhibit strong affinity for a markedly negative atom, less strong affinity for a feebly negative, and little or no affinity for a positively electrified atom; but two similarly electrified atoms may exhibit affinity, because in every positive atom there is some negative electricity, as in every negative atom there is some positive electricity. thus, in the atoms of copper and zinc positive electricity predominates, said berzelius, but the zinc atoms are more positive than those of copper; hence, when the metals are brought into contact the negative electricity of the copper atoms is attracted and neutralized by the positive electricity of the zinc atoms, combination takes place, and the compound atom is still characterized by a predominance of positive electricity. hence berzelius identified "electrical polarity" with chemical affinity. every atom was regarded by him as _both_ positively _and_ negatively electrified; but as one of these electricities was always much stronger than the other, every atom regarded as a whole appeared to be _either_ positively _or_ negatively electrified. positive atoms showed affinity for negative atoms, and _vice versâ_. as a positive atom might become more positive by increasing the temperature of the atom, so might the affinity of this atom for that be more marked at high than at low temperatures. now, if two elementary atoms unite, the compound atom must--according to the berzelian views--be characterized either by positive or negative electricity. this compound atom, if positive, will exhibit affinity for other compound atoms in which negative electricity predominates; if negative, it will exhibit affinity for other positively electrified compound atoms. if two compound atoms unite chemically, the complex atom so produced will, again, be characterized by one or other of the two electricities, and as it is positive or negative, so will it exhibit affinity for positively or negatively electrified complex atoms. thus berzelius and his followers regarded every compound atom, however complex, as essentially built up of two parts, one of which was positively and the other negatively electrified, and which were held together chemically by virtue of the mutual attractions of these electricities; they regarded every compound atom as a _dual_ structure. the classification adopted by berzelius was essentially a dualistic classification. his system has always been known in chemistry as _dualism_. berzelius divided compound atoms (we should now say molecules) into three groups or orders-- _compound atoms of the first order_, formed by the immediate combination of atoms of two, or in organic compounds of three, elementary substances. _compound atoms of the second order_, formed by the combination of atoms of an element with atoms of the first order, or by the combination of two or more atoms of the first order. _compound atoms of the third order_, formed by combination of two or more atoms of the second order. when an atom of the third order was decomposed by an electric current, it split up, according to the berzelian teaching, into atoms of the second order--some positively, others negatively electrified. when an atom of the second order was submitted to electrolysis, it decomposed into atoms of the first order--some positively, others negatively electrified. berzelius said that a base is an electro-positive oxide, and an acid is an electro-negative oxide. the more markedly positive an oxide is, the more basic it is; the more negative it is, the more is it characterized by acid properties. one outcome of this teaching regarding acids and bases was to overthrow the lavoisierian conception of oxygen as the acidifying element. some oxides are positive, others negative, said berzelius; but acids are characterized by negative electricity, therefore the presence of oxygen in a compound does not always confer on that compound acid properties. we have already seen that silica was regarded by most chemists as a typical earth; but berzelius found that in the electrolysis of compounds of silica, this substance appeared at the positive pole of the battery--that is, the atom of silica belonged to the negatively electrified order of atoms. silica was almost certainly an oxide; but electro-negative oxides are, as a class, acids; therefore silica was probably an acid. the supposition of the acid character of silica was amply confirmed by the mineralogical analyses and experiments of berzelius. he showed that most of the earthy minerals are compounds of silica with electro-positive metallic oxides, and that silica plays the part of an acid in these minerals; and in he obtained the element silicon, the oxide of which is silica. on this basis berzelius reared a system of classification in mineralogy which much aided the advance of that branch of natural science. by the work of berzelius and davy the lavoisierian conception of acid has now been much modified and extended; it has been rendered less rigid, and is therefore more likely than before to be a guide to fresh discoveries. the older view of acid and alkali was based, for the most part, on a qualitative study of the reactions of chemical substances: bodies were placed in the same class because they were all sour, or all turned vegetable blues to red, etc. this was followed by a closer study of the composition of substances, and by attempts to connect the properties of these substances with their composition; but when this attempt resulted in the promulgation of the dictum that "oxygen is the acidifying principle," it began to be perceived that a larger basis of fact must be laid before just conclusions could be drawn as to the connections between properties and composition of substances. this larger basis was laid by the two chemists whose work we have now reviewed. of the life of one of these men i have already given such a sketch as i can from the materials available to me; of the life of the other we happily possess ample knowledge. let us now consider the main features of this life. * * * * * humphry davy, the eldest son of robert and grace davy, was born at penzance, in cornwall, on december , , eight months that is before the birth of berzelius. his parents resided on a small property which had belonged to their ancestors for several generations. surrounded by many kind friends by whom he was much thought of, the boy appears to have passed a very happy childhood. even at the age of five his quickness and penetration were marked by those around him, and at school these continued to be his predominant characteristics. nurtured from his infancy in the midst of beautiful and romantic scenery, and endowed with great observing power and a lively imagination, young davy seemed destined to be one of those from whose lips is "poured the deathless singing;" all through life he was characterized by a strongly marked poetic temperament. humphry davy was held in much esteem by his school friends as a composer of valentines and love letters, as a daring and entertaining teller of stories, and as a successful fireworks manufacturer. such a combination of qualities would much endear him to his boy-companions. we are told that at the age of eight he used to mount on an empty cart, around which a circle of boys would collect to be entertained by the wonderful tales of the youthful narrator. finishing his school education at the age of fifteen, he now began his own education of himself. in he was apprenticed to a surgeon and apothecary (afterwards a physician), in penzance, with whom he learned the elements of medical science; but his time during the years which he spent under mr. borlase was much occupied in shooting, fishing, searching for minerals and geological specimens, composing poetry, and pursuing metaphysical speculations. he was now, as through life, an enthusiastic lover of nature; his mind was extremely active, ranging over the most diverse subjects; he was full of imagination, and seemed certain to distinguish himself in any pursuit to which he should turn his attention. during the next three or four years davy indulged freely in speculations in all manner of subjects; he started, as people generally do when young, from general principles and followed these out to many conclusions. even in his study of physiology and other branches of science, he appears at this time to have adopted the speculative rather than the experimental method; but unlike most youthful metaphysicians he was ready to give up an opinion whenever it appeared to him incorrect. by the time he reached the age of twenty he had discarded this method of seeking for truth, and was ever afterwards distinguished by his careful working out of facts as the foundation for all his brilliant theories. davy appears to have begun the study of chemistry about by reading lavoisier's "elements of chemistry," the teachings of which he freely criticized. about this time mr. gregory watt came to live at penzance as a lodger with davy's mother, and with him the young philosopher had much talk on chemical and other scientific subjects. he also became acquainted with mr. davies gilbert--who was destined to succeed davy as president of the royal society--and from him he borrowed books and received assistance of various kinds in his studies. it was during these years that davy made experiments on heat, which were published some years later, and which are now regarded as laying the foundations of the modern theory according to which heat is due to the motions of the small parts of bodies. he arranged two brass plates so that one should carry a block of ice which might be caused to revolve in contact with the other plate; the plates were covered by a glass jar, from which he exhausted the air by means of a simple syringe of his own contrivance; the machine being placed on blocks of ice the plates were caused to revolve. the ice inside the jar soon melted; davy concluded that the heat required to melt this ice could only be produced by the friction of the ice and brass, and that therefore heat could not be any form of ponderable matter. in the year davy was asked to go to bristol as superintendent of the laboratory of a new pneumatic institution started by dr. beddoes for the application of gases to the treatment of diseases. davy had corresponded with beddoes before this time regarding his experiments on heat, and the latter seems to have been struck with his great abilities and to have been anxious to secure him as experimenter for his institution. davy was released from his engagements with mr. borlase, and, now about twenty years of age, set out for his new home, having made as he says all the experiments he could at penzance, and eagerly looking forward to the better appliances and incitements to research which he hoped to find at bristol. the pneumatic institution was supported by subscriptions, for the most part from scientific men. it was started on a scientific basis. researches were to be made on gases of various kinds with the view of applying these as remedies in the alleviation of disease. an hospital for patients, a laboratory for experimental research, and a lecture theatre were provided. at this time many men of literary and intellectual eminence resided in bristol; among these were coleridge and southey. most of these men were visitors at the house of dr. beddoes, and many distinguished men came from various parts of the county to visit the institution. davy thus entered on a sphere of labour eminently suited for the development of his genius. with ample mechanical appliances for research, with plenty of time at his disposal, surrounded by an atmosphere of inquiry and by men who would welcome any additions he could make to the knowledge of nature, and being at the same time not without poetic and imaginative surroundings, by which he was ever spurred onwards in the pursuit of truth--placed in these circumstances, such an enthusiastic and diligent student of science as davy could not but obtain results of value to his fellows. the state of chemical science at this time was evidently such as to incite the youthful worker. the chains with which stahl and his successors had so long bound the limbs of the young science had been broken by lavoisier; and although the french school of chemistry was at this time dominant, and not disinclined to treat as ignorant any persons who might differ from its teaching, yet there was plenty of life in the cultivators of chemistry. the controversy between berthollet and proust was about to begin; the lavoisierian views regarding acids and salts were not altogether accepted by gay-lussac, thenard and others; and from the laboratory of berzelius there was soon to issue the first of those numerous researches which drew the attention of every chemist to the capital of sweden. the voltaic battery had been discovered, and had opened up a region of possibilities in chemistry. davy began his researches at the institution by experiments with nitrous oxide, a gas supposed by some people at that time to be capable of producing most harmful effects on the animal system. he had to make many experiments before he found a method for preparing the pure gas, and in the course of these experiments he added much to the stock of chemical knowledge regarding the compounds of nitrogen and oxygen. having obtained fairly pure nitrous oxide, he breathed it from a silk bag; he experienced a "sensation analogous to gentle pressure on all the muscles;... the objects around me became dazzling and my hearing more acute;... at last an irresistible propensity to action was indulged in.... i recollect but indistinctly what followed; i know that my motions were various and violent." southey and coleridge breathed the gas; the poets only laughed a little. encouraged by the results of these experiments, davy proceeded to prepare and breathe nitric oxide--whereby he was rendered very ill--and then carburetted hydrogen--which nearly killed him. in his chemical note-book about this time, davy says, "the perfection of chemical philosophy, or the laws of corpuscular motion, must depend on the knowledge of all the simple substances, their mutual attractions, and the ratio in which the attractions increase or diminish with increase or diminution of temperature.... the first step towards these laws will be the decomposition of those bodies which are at present undecompounded." and in the same note-book he suggests methods which he thinks might effect the decomposition of muriatic and boric acids, the alkalis and earths. here are the germs of his future work. after about eight months' work at bristol he published a volume of "researches," which contained a great many new facts, and was characterized by vigour and novelty of conception. these researches had been carried out with intense application; each was struck off at a red heat. his mind during this time was filled with vast scientific conceptions, and he began also to think of fame. "an active mind, a deep ideal feeling of good, and a look towards future greatness," he tells us, sustained him. count rumford, the founder of the royal institution in london, was anxious to obtain a lecturer on chemistry for the institution. davy was strongly recommended, and after a little arrangement--concerning which davy says in a letter, "i will accept of no appointment except on the sacred terms of independence"--he was appointed assistant lecturer on chemistry and director of the laboratory. about a year later his official designation was changed to professor of chemistry. this appointment opened up a great sphere of research; "the sole and uncontrolled use of the apparatus of the institution for private experiments" was to be granted him, and he was promised "any apparatus he might need for new experiments." he had now the command of a good laboratory; he had not to undergo the drudgery of systematic teaching, but was only required to give lectures to a general audience. before leaving bristol he had commenced experiments on the chemical applications of the voltaic battery; these he at once followed up with the better apparatus now at his command. the results of this research, and his subsequent work on the alkalis and on muriatic acid and chlorine, have been already described. the circumstances of davy's life had hitherto been most favourable; how nobly he had availed himself of these circumstances was testified by the work done by him. his first lecture was delivered in the spring of , and at once he became famous. a friend of davy says, "the sensation created by his first course of lectures at the institution, and the enthusiastic admiration which they obtained, is scarcely to be imagined. men of the first rank and talent, the literary and the scientific, the practical and the theoretical, blue-stockings and women of fashion, the old and the young--all crowded, eagerly crowded the lecture-room. his youth, his simplicity, his natural eloquence, his chemical knowledge, his happy illustrations and well-conducted experiments, excited universal attention and unbounded applause. compliments, invitations and presents were showered upon him in abundance from all quarters; his society was courted by all, and all appeared proud of his acquaintance." one of his biographers says of these lectures, "he was always in earnest, and when he amused most, amusement appeared most foreign to his object. his great and first object was to instruct, and in conjunction with this, maintain the importance and dignity of science; indeed, the latter, and the kindling a taste for scientific pursuits, might rather be considered his main object, and the conveying instruction a secondary one." the greatest pains were taken by davy in the composition and rehearsal of his lectures, and in the arrangement of experiments, that everything should tend towards the enlightenment of his audience. surrounded by a brilliant society, invited to every fashionable entertainment, flattered by admirers, tempted by hopes of making money, davy remained a faithful and enthusiastic student of nature. "i am a lover of nature," he writes at this time to a friend, "with an ungratified imagination. i shall continue to search for untasted charms, for hidden beauties. my _real_, my _waking_ existence, is amongst the objects of scientific research. common amusements and enjoyments are necessary to me only as dreams to interrupt the flow of thoughts too nearly analogous to enlighten and vivify." during these years (_i.e._ from to ) he worked for the greater part of each day in the laboratory. every week, almost every day, saw some fresh discovery of importance. he advanced from discovery to discovery. his work was characterized by that vast industry and extreme rapidity which belong only to the efforts of genius. never, before or since, has chemical science made such strides in this country. in davy was elected a fellow, and in one of the secretaries of the royal society. in he retired from the professorship of chemistry at the royal institution; in the same year he was made a knight. the next two or three years were mostly spent in travelling abroad with his wife--he had married a widow lady, mrs. apreece, in . during his visit to paris he made several experiments on the then recently discovered iodine, and proved this substance to be an element. the work which davy had accomplished in the seventeen years that had now elapsed since he began the study of chemistry, whether we consider it simply as a contribution to chemical science, or in the light of the influence it exerted on the researches of others, was of first-rate importance; but a fresh field now began to open before him, from which he was destined to reap the richest fruits. in the autumn of his attention was drawn to the subject of fire-damp in coal-mines. as he passed through newcastle, on his return from a holiday spent in the scottish highlands, he examined various coal-mines and collected samples of fire-damp; in december of the same year his _safety-lamp_ was perfected, and soon after this it was in the hands of the miner. the steps in the discovery of this valuable instrument were briefly these. davy established the fact that fire-damp is a compound of carbon and hydrogen; he found that this gas must be mixed with a large quantity of ordinary air before the mixture becomes explosive, that the temperature at which this explosion occurs is a high one, and that but little heat is produced during the explosion; he found that the explosive mixture could not be fired in narrow metallic tubes, and also that it was rendered non-explosive by addition of carbonic acid or nitrogen. he reasoned on these facts thus: "it occurred to me, as a _considerable_ heat was required for the inflammation of the fire-damp, and as it produced in burning a comparatively _small degree_ of heat, that the effect of carbonic acid and azote, and of the surfaces of small tubes, in preventing its explosion, depended on their cooling powers--upon their lowering the temperature of the exploding mixture so much that it was no longer sufficient for its continuous inflammation." he at once set about constructing a lamp in which it should be impossible for the temperature of ignition of a mixture of fire-damp and air to be attained, and which therefore, while burning, might be filled with this mixture without any danger of an explosion. he surrounded the flame of an oil-lamp with a cylinder of fine wire-gauze; this lamp when brought into an atmosphere containing fire-damp and air could not cause an explosion, because although small explosions might occur in the interior of the wire cylinder, so much heat was conducted away by the large metallic surface that the temperature of the explosive atmosphere outside the lamp could not attain that point at which explosion would occur. in sir humphry davy was made a baronet, in recognition of his great services as the inventor of the safety-lamp; and in he was elected to the most honourable position which can be held by a man of science in this country, he became the president of the royal society. for seven years he was annually re-elected president, and during that time he was the central figure in the scientific society of england. during these years he continued his investigations chiefly on electro-chemical subjects and on various branches of applied science. in his health began to fail. an attack of paralysis in that year obliged him to relinquish most of his work. he went abroad and travelled in italy and the tyrol, sometimes strong enough to shoot or fish a little, or even to carry on electrical experiments; sometimes confined to his room, or to gentle exercise only. he resigned the presidentship of the royal society in . in he visited rome, where he was again attacked by paralysis, and thought himself dying, but he recovered sufficiently to attempt the journey homeward. at geneva he became very ill, and expired in that city on the th of may . during these later years of illness and suffering, his intense love of and delight in nature were very apparent; he returned again to the simple tastes and pleasures of his early days. his intimate knowledge of natural appearances and of the sights and sounds of country life is conspicuous in the "salmonia, or days of fly-fishing," written during his later years. sir humphry davy was emphatically a genius. he was full of eager desire to know the secrets of the world in which he lived; he looked around him with wonder and delight, ever conscious of the vastness of the appearances which met his gaze; an exuberance of life and energy marked his actions; difficulties were encountered by him only to be overcome; he was depressed by no misfortunes, deterred by no obstacles, led aside from his object by no temptations, and held in bondage by no false analogies. his work must ever remain as a model to the student of science. a thorough and careful foundation of fact is laid; on this, hypotheses are raised, to be tested first by reasoning and argument, then by the tests of the laboratory, which alone are final. analogies are seized; hints are eagerly taken up, examined, and acted on or dismissed. as he works in the laboratory, we see his mind ranging over the whole field of chemical knowledge, finding a solution of a difficulty here, or guessing at a solution there; combining apparently most diverse facts; examining phenomena which appear to have no connection; never dwelling too long on an hypothesis which cannot yield some clue to the object of research, but quickly discovering the road which will lead to the wished-for solution. like so many great experimenters davy accomplished wonders with little apparatus. when he went abroad for the first time he took with him two small boxes, one twenty, and the other twelve inches long, by about seven inches wide and four deep. with the apparatus contained in these boxes he established the elementary nature of iodine, and made a rough estimation of its atomic weight; he determined many of its analogies with chlorine, proving that, like chlorine, it is markedly electro-negative, and that its compounds are decomposed by chlorine; he accomplished the synthesis of hydriodic acid, and approximately determined the composition of iodide of nitrogen. but when it was necessary to employ delicate or powerful apparatus, he was able by the use of that also to obtain results of primary importance. the decomposition of potash, soda, baryta, lime and strontia could not have been effected had he not had at his command the resources of a well-furnished laboratory. davy has had no successor in england. much useful and some brilliant work has been done by english chemists since his day, but we still look back to the first quarter of the century as the golden age of chemistry in this country. on the roll wherein are written the names of england's greatest sons, there is inscribed but a single chemist--humphry davy. * * * * * i carried on the account of the work of davy's great contemporary, berzelius, to the time when he had fairly established dualistic views of the structure of chemical compounds, and when, by the application of a few simple rules regarding the combinations of elementary atoms, he had largely extended the bounds of the atomic theory of dalton. berzelius also did important work in the domain of organic chemistry. by numerous analyses of compounds of animal and vegetable origin, he clearly established the fact that the same laws of combination, the same fixity of composition, and the same general features of atomic structure prevail among the so-called organic as among the inorganic compounds. in doing this he broke down the artificial barrier which had been raised between the two branches of the science, and so prepared the way for modern chemistry, which has won its chief triumphs in the examination of organic compounds. by the many and great improvements which he introduced into analytical chemistry, and by the publication of his "textbook of chemistry," which went through several editions in french and german, and also of his yearly report on the advance of chemistry, berzelius exerted a great influence on the progress of his favourite science. wöhler tells us that when the spring of the year came, at which time his annual report had to be prepared, berzelius shut himself up in his study, surrounded himself with books, and did not stir from the writing-table until the work was done. in his later days berzelius was much engaged in controversy with the leaders of the new school, the rise and progress of which will be traced in the next chapter, but throughout this controversy he found time to add many fresh facts to those already known. he continued his researches until his death in . the work of the great swedish chemist is characterized by thoroughness in all its parts: to him every fact appeared to be of importance; although now perhaps only an isolated fact, he saw that some day it would find a place in a general scheme of classification. he worked in great measure on the lines laid down by dalton and davy; the enormous number and accuracy of his analyses established the law of multiple proportions on a sure basis, and his attempts to determine the constitution of compound atoms, while advancing the atomic theory of dalton, drew attention to the all-important distinction between atom and molecule, and so prepared chemists for the acceptance of the generalization of avogadro. the electro-chemical conceptions of davy were modified by berzelius; they were shorn of something of their elasticity, but were rendered more suited to be the basis of a rigid theory. * * * * * at the close of this transition period from the lavoisierian to the modern chemistry, we find analytical chemistry established as an art; we find the atomic theory generally accepted, but we notice the existence of much confusion which has arisen from the non-acceptance of the distinction made by avogadro between atom and molecule; we find the analogies between chemical affinity and electrical energy made the basis of a system of classification which regards every compound atom (or molecule) as built up of two parts, in one of which positive, and in the other negative electricity predominates; and accompanying this system of classification we find that an acid is no longer regarded as necessarily an oxygen compound, but rather as a compound possessed of certain properties which are probably due to the arrangement of the elementary atoms, among which hydrogen appears generally to find a place; we find that salts are for the most part regarded as metallic derivatives of acids; and we find that by the decomposition of the supposed elementary substances, potash, soda, lime, etc., the number of the elements has been extended, the application of a new instrument of research has been brilliantly rewarded, and the lavoisierian description of "element" as the "attained, not the attainable, limit of research" has been emphasized. footnotes: [ ] the history and meaning of these terms is considered on p. , _et seq._ [ ] for an explanation of this expression, "chemical affinity," see p. , _et seq._ [ ] these views have been already explained on pp. , . chapter v. the work of graham. _thomas graham_, - . the work of graham, concerned as it mostly was with the development of the conception of atoms, connects the time of dalton with that in which we are now living. i have therefore judged it advisable to devote a short chapter to a consideration of the life-work of this chemist, before proceeding to the third period of chemical advance, that, namely, which witnessed the development of organic chemistry through the labours of men who were graham's contemporaries. the printed materials which exist for framing the story of graham's life are very meagre, but as he appears, from the accounts of his friends, to have devoted himself entirely to scientific researches, we cannot go far wrong in regarding the history of his various discoveries as also the history of his life. * * * * * thomas graham was born in glasgow, on december , . his father, james graham, a successful manufacturer, was in a position to give his son a good education. after some years spent in the ordinary school training, graham entered glasgow university at the early age of fourteen, and graduated as m. a. five years later. it was the intention of graham's father that his son should enter the scottish church; but under the teaching of dr. thomas thomson and others the lad imbibed so strong a love of natural science, that rather than relinquish the pursuit of his favourite study, he determined to be independent of his father and make a living for himself. his father was much annoyed at the determination of his son to pursue science, and vainly attempted to force him into the clerical profession. the quarrel between father and son increased in bitterness, and notwithstanding the intervention of friends the father refused to make his son any allowance for his maintenance; and although many years after a reconcilement was effected, yet at the time when graham most needed his father's help he was left to struggle alone. graham went to edinburgh, where he pursued his studies under hope and leslie, professors of chemistry and physics respectively--men whose names were famous wherever natural science was studied. graham's mother, for whom he had always the greatest respect and warmest love, and his sister margaret helped him as best they could during this trying time. the young student found some literary occupation and a little teaching in edinburgh, and sometimes he was asked to make investigations in subjects connected with applied chemistry. thus he struggled on for four or five years, during which time he began to publish papers on chemico-physical subjects. in the year he was appointed lecturer on chemistry at the mechanics' institution in glasgow, and next year he was removed to the more important position of lecturer on the same science at the andersonian institution in that city. this position he occupied for seven years, when he was elected professor of chemistry in the university of london (now university college): he had been elected to the fellowship of the royal society in the preceding year. during his stay at the andersonian institution graham had established his fame as a physical chemist; he had begun his work on acids and salts, and had established the fundamental facts concerning gaseous diffusion. these researches he continued in london, and from to he enriched chemical science with a series of papers concerned for the most part with attempts to trace the movements of the atoms of matter. in graham succeeded sir john herschel in the important and honourable position of master of the mint. for some years after his appointment he was much engaged with the duties of his office, but about he again returned to his atomic studies, and in his papers on "transpiration of liquids" and on "dialysis" he did much in the application of physical methods to solve chemical problems, and opened up new paths, by travelling on which his successors greatly advanced the limits of the science of chemistry. graham was almost always at work; his holidays were "few and far between." by the year or so his general health began to grow feeble; in the autumn of , during a visit to malvern where he sought repose and invigorating air, he caught cold, which developed into inflammation of the lungs. on his return to london the disease was overcome by medical remedies, but he continued very weak, and gradually sank, till the end came on the th of september . i have said that the seven years during which graham held the lectureship on chemistry in the andersonian institution, glasgow, witnessed the beginning alike of his work on salts and of that on gaseous diffusion. he showed that there exists a series of compounds of various salts, _e.g._ chloride of calcium, chloride of zinc, etc., with alcohol. he compared the alcohol in these salts, which he called _alcoates_, to the water in ordinary crystallized salts, and thus drew the attention of chemists to the important part played by water in determining the properties of many substances. three years later ( ) appeared one of his most important papers, bearing on the general conception of acids: "researches on the arseniates, phosphates, and modifications of phosphoric acid." chemists at this time knew that phosphoric acid--that is, the substance obtained by adding water to pentoxide of phosphorus--exhibited many peculiarities, but they were for the most part content to leave these unexplained. graham, following up the analogy which he had already established between water and bases, prepared and carefully determined the composition of a series of phosphates, and concluded that pentoxide of phosphorus is able to combine with a base--say soda--in three different proportions, and thus to produce three different phosphates of soda. but as graham accepted that view which regards a salt as a metallic derivative of an acid, he supposed that three different phosphoric acids ought to exist; these acids he found in the substances produced by the action of water on the oxide of phosphorus. he showed that just as the oxide combines with a base in three proportions, so does it combine with water in three proportions. this water he regarded as chemically analogous to the base in the three salts, one atom (we should now rather say molecule) of base could be replaced by one atom of water, two atoms of base by two atoms of water, or three atoms of base by three atoms of water. phosphoric acid was therefore regarded by graham as a compound of pentoxide of phosphorus and water, the latter being as essentially a part of the acid as the former. he distinguished between _monobasic_, _dibasic_, and _tribasic_ phosphoric acids: by the action of a base on the _monobasic acid_, one, and only one salt was produced; the _dibasic acid_ could furnish two salts, containing different proportions (or a different number of atoms) of the same base: and from the _tribasic acid_ three salts, containing the same base but in different proportions, could be obtained. davy's view of an acid as a compound of water with a negative oxide was thus confirmed, and there was added to chemical science the conception of _acids of different basicity_. in graham's paper on "water as a constituent of salts" was published in the "transactions of the royal society of edinburgh." in this paper he inquires whether the water in crystalline salts can or cannot be removed without destroying the chemical individuality of the salts. he finds that in some crystalline salts part of the water can be easily removed by the application of heat, but the remainder only at very high temperatures. he distinguishes between those atoms of water which essentially belong to the compound atom of the salt, and those atoms which can be readily removed therefrom, which are as it were added on to, or built up around the exterior of the atom of salt. in this paper graham began to distinguish what is now called _water of crystallization_ from _water of constitution_, a distinction pointed to by some of davy's researches, but a distinction which has remained too much a mere matter of nomenclature since the days of graham. in these researches graham emphasized the necessity of the presence of hydrogen in all true acids; as he had drawn an analogy between water and bases, so now he saw in the hydrogen of acids the analogue of the metal of salts. he regarded the structure of the compound atom of an acid as similar to that of the compound atom of a salt; the hydrogen atom, or atoms, in the acid was replaced by a metallic atom, or atoms, and so a compound atom of the salt was produced. davy and berzelius had proved that hydrogen is markedly electro-positive; hydrogen appeared to graham to belong to the class of metals. in making this bold hypothesis graham necessarily paid little heed to those properties of metals which appeal to the senses of the observer. metals, as a class, are lustrous, heavy, malleable substances; hydrogen is a colourless, inodourless, invisible, very light gas: how then can hydrogen be said to be metallic? i have again and again insisted on the need of imagination for the successful study of natural science. although in science we deal with phenomena which we wish to measure and weigh and record in definite and precise language, yet he only is the successful student of science who can penetrate beneath the surface of things, who can form mental pictures different from those which appear before his bodily eye, and so can discern the intricate and apparently irregular analogies which explain the phenomena he is set to study. graham was not as far as we can learn endowed, like davy, with the sensitive nature of a poet, yet his work on hydrogen proves him to have possessed a large share of the gift of imagination. picturing to himself the hydrogen atom as essentially similar in its chemical functions to the atom of a metal, he tracked this light invisible gas through many tortuous courses: he showed how it is absorbed and retained (_occluded_ as he said) by many metals; he found it in meteors which had come from far-away regions of space; and at last, the year before he died he prepared an alloy of palladium and the metal hydrogen, from which a few medals were struck, bearing the legend "palladium-hydrogenium ." within the last few years hydrogen has been liquified and, it is said, solidified. solid hydrogen is described as a steel-grey substance which fell upon the table with a sound like the ring of a metal. but graham's most important work was concerned with the motion of the ultimate particles of bodies. he uses the word "atom" pretty much as dalton did. he does not make a distinction between the atom of an element and the atom of a compound, but apparently uses the term as a convenient one to express the smallest undivided particle of any chemical substance which exhibits the properties of that substance. as graham was chiefly concerned with the physical properties of chemical substances, or with those properties which are studied alike by chemistry and physics, the distinction between atom and molecule, so all-important in pure chemistry, might be, and to a great extent was, overlooked by him. in considering his work we shall however do well to use the terms "atom" and "molecule" in the sense in which they are now always used in chemistry, a sense which has been already discussed (see pp. - ). many years before graham began his work a curious fact had been recorded but not explained. in döbereiner filled a glass jar with hydrogen and allowed the jar to stand over water: on returning after twelve hours he found that the water had risen about an inch and a half into the jar. close examination of the jar showed the presence of a small crack in the glass. many jars, tubes and flasks, all with small cracks in the glass, were filled with hydrogen and allowed to stand over water; in every case the water rose in the vessel. no rise of the water was however noticeable if the vessels were filled with ordinary air, nitrogen or oxygen. in graham began the investigation of the peculiar phenomenon observed by döbereiner. repeating döbereiner's experiments, graham found that a portion of the hydrogen in the cracked vessels passed outwards through the small fissures, and a little air passed inwards: the water therefore rose in the jar, tube or flask, because there was a greater pressure on the surface of the water outside than upon that inside the vessel. any gas lighter than air behaved like hydrogen; when gases heavier than air were employed the level of the water inside the vessel was slightly lowered after some hours. graham found that the passage of gases through minute openings could be much more accurately studied by placing the gas to be examined in a glass tube one end of which was closed by a plug of dry plaster of paris, than by using vessels with small fissures in the glass. the _diffusion-tube_ used by graham generally consisted of a piece of glass tubing, graduated in fractions of a cubic inch and having a bulb blown near one end; the short end was closed by a thin plug of dry plaster of paris (gypsum), the tube was filled with the gas to be examined, and the open end was immediately immersed in water. the water was allowed to rise until it had attained a constant level, when it was found that the whole of the gas originally in the tube had passed outwards through the porous plug, and air had passed inwards. the volume of gas originally in the tube being known, and the volume of air in the tube at the close of the experiment being measured, it was only necessary to divide the former by the latter number in order to obtain the number of volumes of gas which had passed outwards for each one volume of air which had passed inwards; in other words to obtain the _rate of diffusion_ compared with air of the gas under examination. graham's results were gathered together in the statement, "the diffusion-rates of any two gases are inversely as the square roots of their densities." thus, take oxygen and hydrogen: oxygen is sixteen times heavier than hydrogen, therefore hydrogen diffuses four times more rapidly than oxygen. take hydrogen and air: the specific gravity of hydrogen is · , air being ; the square root of · is · , therefore hydrogen will diffuse more rapidly than air in the ratio of · : . in the years - graham resumed this inquiry; he now distinguished between _diffusion_, or the passage of gases through porous plates, and _transpiration_, or the passage of gases through capillary tubes. he showed that if a sufficiently large capillary tube be employed the rate of transpiration of a gas becomes constant, but that it is altogether different from the rate of diffusion of the same gas. he established the fact that there is a connection of some kind between the transpiration-rates and the chemical composition of gases, and in doing this he opened up a field of inquiry by cultivating which many important results have been gained within the last few years, and which is surely destined to yield more valuable fruit in the future. returning to the diffusion of gases, graham, after nearly thirty years' more or less constant labour, begins to speculate a little on the causes of the phenomena he had so studiously and perseveringly been examining. in his paper on "the molecular mobility of gases," read to the royal society in , after describing a new diffusion-tube wherein thin plates of artificial graphite were used in place of plaster of paris, graham says, "the pores of artificial graphite appear to be really so minute that a gas _in mass_ cannot penetrate the plate at all. it seems that molecules only can pass; and they may be supposed to pass wholly unimpeded by friction, for the smallest pores that can be imagined to exist in the graphite must be tunnels in magnitude to the ultimate atom of a gaseous body." he then shortly describes the molecular theory of matter, and shows how this theory--a sketch of which so far as it concerns us in this book has been given on pp. - --explains the results which he has obtained. when a gas passed through a porous plate into a vacuum, or when one gas passed in one direction and another in the opposite direction through the same plate, graham saw the molecules of each gas rushing through the "tunnels" of graphite or stucco. the average rate at which the molecules of a gas rushed along was the diffusion-rate of that gas. the lighter the gas the more rapid was the motion of its molecules. if a mixture of two gases, one much lighter than the other, were allowed to flow through a porous plate, the lighter gas would pass so much more quickly than the heavier gas that a partial separation of the two might probably be effected. graham accomplished such a separation of oxygen and hydrogen, and of oxygen and nitrogen; and he described a simple instrument whereby this process of _atmolysis_, as he called it, might be effected. graham's _tube atmolyser_ consisted of a long tobacco-pipe stem placed inside a rather shorter and considerably wider tube of glass; the pipe stem was fixed by passing through two corks, one at each end of the glass tube; through one of these corks there also passed a short piece of glass tubing. when the instrument was employed, the piece of short glass tubing was connected with an air-pump, and one end of the pipe stem with the gaseous mixture--say ordinary air. the air-pump being set in motion, the gaseous mixture was allowed to flow slowly through the pipe stem; the lighter ingredient of the mixture passed outwards through the pipe stem into the wide glass tube more rapidly than the heavier ingredient, and was swept away to the air-pump; the heavier ingredient could be collected, mixed with only a small quantity of the lighter, at the other end of the pipe stem. as graham most graphically expressed it, "the stream of gas diminishes as it proceeds, like a river flowing over a pervious bed." graham then contrived a very simple experiment whereby he was able to measure the rate of motion of the molecules of carbonic acid. he introduced a little carbonic acid into the lower part of a tall cylindrical jar, and at the close of certain fixed periods of time he determined the amount of carbonic acid which had diffused upwards through the air into the uppermost layer of the jar. knowing the height of the jar, he now knew the distance through which a small portion of carbonic acid passed in a stated time, and regarding this small portion as consisting of a great many molecules, all moving at about equal rates, he had determined the average velocity of the molecules of carbonic acid. a similar experiment was performed with hydrogen. the general results were that the molecules of carbonic acid move about in still air with a velocity equal to seventy-three millimetres per minute, and that under the same conditions the molecules of hydrogen move with a velocity equal to about one-third of a metre per minute.[ ] the bakerian lecture for , read by graham before the royal society, was entitled "on the diffusion of liquids." in this paper he describes a very large number of experiments made with a view to determine the rate at which a salt in aqueous solution diffuses, or passes upwards into a layer of pure water above it, the salt solution and the water not being separated by any intervening medium. graham's method of procedure consisted in completely filling a small bottle with a salt solution of known strength, placing this bottle in a larger graduated vessel, and carefully filling the latter with water. measured portions of the water in the larger vessel were withdrawn at stated intervals, and the quantity of salt in each portion was determined. graham found that under these conditions salts diffused with very varying velocities. groups of salts showed equal rates of diffusion. there appeared to be no definite connection between the molecular weights of the salts and their diffusion-rates; but as graham constantly regarded diffusion, whether of gases or liquids, as essentially due to the movements of minute particles, he thought that the particles which moved about as wholes during diffusion probably consisted of groups of what might be called chemical molecules--in other words, graham recognized various orders of small particles. as the atom was supposed to have a simpler structure than the molecule (if indeed it had a structure at all), so there probably existed groups of molecules which, under certain conditions, behaved as individual particles with definite properties. as graham applied the diffusion of gases to the separation of two gases of unequal densities, so he applied the diffusion of liquids to the separation of various salts in solution. he showed also that some complex salts, such as the alums, were partially separated into their constituents during the process of diffusion. the prosecution of these researches led to most important results, which were gathered together in a paper on "liquid diffusion applied to analysis," read to the royal society in . graham divided substances into those which diffused easily and quickly into water, and those which diffused very slowly; he showed that the former were all crystallizable substances, while the latter were non-crystallizable jelly-like bodies. graham called these jelly-like substances _colloids;_ the easily diffusible substances he called _crystalloids_. he proved that a colloidal substance acts towards a crystalloid much as water does; that the crystalloid rapidly diffuses through the colloid, but that colloids are not themselves capable of diffusing through other colloids. on this fact was founded graham's process of _dialysis_. as colloid he employed a sheet of parchment paper, which he stretched on a ring of wood or caoutchouc, and floated the apparatus so constructed--_the dialyser_--on the surface of pure water in a glass dish; he then poured into the dialyser the mixture of substances which it was desired to separate. let us suppose that this mixture contained sugar and gum; the crystalloidal sugar soon passed through the parchment paper, and was found in the water outside, but the colloidal gum remained in the dialyser. if the mixture in the dialyser contained two crystalloids, the greater part of the more diffusible of these passed through the parchment in a short time along with only a little of the less diffusible; a partial separation was thus effected. this method of dialysis was applied by graham to separate and obtain in the pure state many colloidal modifications of chemical compounds, such as aluminium and tin hydrates, etc. by his study of these peculiar substances graham introduced into chemistry a new class of bodies, and opened up great fields of research. matter in the colloidal state appears to be endowed with properties which are quite absent, or are hidden, when it is in the ordinary crystalloidal condition. colloids are readily affected by the smallest changes in external conditions; they are eminently unstable bodies; they are, graham said, always on the verge of an impending change, and minute disturbances in the surrounding conditions may precipitate this change at any moment. crystalloids, on the other hand, are stable; they have definite properties, which are not changed without simultaneous large changes in surrounding conditions. but although, to use graham's words, these classes of bodies "appear like different worlds of matter," there is yet no marked separating line between them. ice is a substance which under ordinary conditions exhibits all the properties of crystalloids, but ice formed in contact with water just at the freezing point is not unlike a mass of partly dried gum; it shows no crystalline structure, but it may be rent and split like a lump of glue, and, like glue, the broken pieces may be pressed together again and caused to adhere into one mass. "can any facts," asks graham, "more strikingly illustrate the maxim that in nature there are no abrupt transitions, and that distinctions of class are never absolute?" in the properties of colloids and crystalloids graham saw an index of diversity of molecular structure. the smallest individual particle of a colloid appeared to him to be a much more complex structure than the smallest particle of a crystalloid. the colloidal molecule appeared to be formed by the gathering together of several crystalloidal molecules; such a complex structure might be expected readily to undergo change, whereas the simpler molecule of a crystalloid would probably present more definite and less readily altered properties. in this research graham had again, as so often before, arrived at the conception of various orders of small particles. in the early days of the daltonian theory it seemed that the recognition of atoms as ultimate particles, by the placing together of which masses of this or that kind of matter are produced, would suffice to explain all the facts of chemical combinations; but dalton's application of the term "atom" to elements and compounds alike implied that an atom might itself have parts, and that one atom might be more complex than another. the way was thus already prepared for the recognition of more than one order of atoms, a recognition which was formulated three years after the appearance of dalton's "new system" in the statement of avogadro, "equal volumes of gases contain equal numbers of molecules;" for we have seen that the application of this statement to actually occurring reactions between gases obliges us to admit that the molecules of hydrogen, oxygen and many other elementary gases are composed of two distinct parts or atoms. berzelius it is true did not formally accept the generalization of avogadro; but we have seen how the conception of atom which runs through his work is not that of an indivisible particle, but rather that of a little individual part of matter with definite properties, from which the mass of matter recognizable by our senses is constructed, just as the wall is built up of individual bricks. and as the bricks are themselves constructed of clay, which in turn is composed of silica and alumina, so may each of these little parts of matter be constructed of smaller parts; only as clay is not brick, and neither silica nor alumina is clay, so the properties of the parts of the atom--if it has parts--are not the properties of the atom, and a mass of matter constructed of these parts would not have the same properties as a mass of matter constructed of the atoms themselves. another feature of graham's work is found in the prominence which he gives to that view of a chemical compound which regards it as the resultant of the action and reaction of the parts of the compound. as the apparent stability of chemical compounds was seen by davy to be the result of an equilibrium of contending forces, so did the seemingly changeless character of any chemical substance appear to graham as due to the orderly changes which are continually proceeding among the molecules of which the substance is constructed. a piece of lime, or a drop of water, was to the mind of graham the scene of a continual strife, for that minute portion of matter appeared to him to be constructed of almost innumerable myriads of little parts, each in more or less rapid motion, one now striking against another and now moving free for a little space. interfere with those movements, alter the mutual action of those minute particles, and the whole building would fall to pieces. for more than thirty years graham was content to trace the movements of molecules. during that time he devoted himself, with an intense and single-minded devotion, to the study of molecular science. undaunted in early youth by the withdrawal of his father's support; unseduced in his middle age by the temptations of technical chemistry, by yielding to which he would soon have secured a fortune; undazzled in his later days by the honours of the position to which he had attained; graham dedicated his life to the nobler object of advancing the bounds of natural knowledge, and so adding to those truths which must ever remain for the good and furtherance of humanity. footnotes: [ ] a metre is equal to about thirty-nine inches; a millimetre is the one-thousandth part of a metre. chapter vi. rise and progress of organic chemistry--period of liebig and dumas. _justus liebig, - . jean baptiste andré dumas, born in ._ i have as yet said almost nothing with regard to the progress of organic chemistry, considered as a special branch of the science. it is however in this department that the greatest triumphs which mark the third period of chemical advance have been won. we must therefore now turn our attention to the work which has been done here. the ancients drew no such distinction between portions of their chemical knowledge, limited as it was, as is implied by the modern terms "organic" and "inorganic chemistry." an organic acid--acetic--was one of the earliest known substances belonging to the class of acids; many processes of chemical handicraft practised in the olden times dealt with the manufacture of substances, such as soap, leather or gum, which we should now call organic substances. nor did the early alchemists, although working chiefly with mineral or inorganic substances, draw any strict division between the two branches of chemistry. the medical chemists of the sixteenth century dealt much with substances derived from plants and animals, such as benzoic and succinic acids, spirit of wine, oils, etc. but neither in their nomenclature nor in their practice did they sharply distinguish inorganic from organic compounds. they spoke of the _quintessence_ of arsenic and the _quintessence_ of alcohol; they applied the term "oil" alike to the products of the action of acids on metallic salts and to substances obtained from vegetables. but towards the end of the seventeenth century, at the time that is when the phlogistic theory began to gain pre-eminence, we find gradually springing up a division of chemical substances into mineral, animal and vegetable substances--a division which was based rather on a consideration of the sources whence the substances were derived than on the properties of the substances themselves, and therefore a division which was essentially a non-chemical one. about a century after this, systematic attempts began to be made to trace some peculiarity of composition as belonging to all compounds of organic, that is, of animal or vegetable, origin. as very many of the substances then known belonging to this class were more or less oil-like in their properties--oils, fats, balsams, gums, sugar, etc.--organic substances generally were said to be characterized by the presence in them of the _principle of oil_. such a statement as this, although suited to the conceptions of that time, could not be received when lavoisier had shown chemists how nature ought be examined. with the definite conception of element introduced by the new chemistry, came an attempt to prove that organic compounds were built up of elements which were rarely found together in any one compound of inorganic origin. substances of vegetable origin were said by lavoisier to be composed of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, while phosphorus and nitrogen, in addition to those three elements, entered into the composition of substances derived from animals. but neither could this definition of organic compounds be upheld in the face of facts. wax and many oils contained only carbon and hydrogen, yet they were undoubtedly substances of vegetable or animal origin. if the presence of any two of the three elements, carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, were to be regarded as a sufficient criterion for the classification of a compound, then it was necessary that carbonic acid--obtained by the action of a mineral acid on chalk--should be called an organic compound. to berzelius belongs the honour of being the chemist who first applied the general laws of chemical combination to all compounds alike, whether derived from minerals, animals, or vegetables. the ultimate particles, or molecules, of every compound were regarded by berzelius as built up of two parts, each of which might itself be an elementary atom, or a group of elementary atoms. one of these parts, he said, was characterized by positive, the other by negative electricity. every compound molecule, whatever was the nature or number of the elementary atoms composing it, was a dual structure (see p. ). organic chemistry came again to be a term somewhat loosely applied to the compounds derived from animals or vegetables, or in the formation of which the agency of living things was necessary. most, if not all of these compounds contained carbon and some other element or elements, especially hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen. but the progress of this branch of chemistry was impeded by the want of any trustworthy methods for analysing compounds containing carbon, oxygen and hydrogen. this want was to be supplied, and the science of organic chemistry, and so of chemistry in general, was to be immensely advanced by the labours of a new school of chemists, chief among whom were liebig and dumas. let us shortly trace the work of these two renowned naturalists. the life-work of the first is finished; i write this story of the progress of his favourite science on the eighty-second birthday of the second of these great men, who is still with us a veteran crowned with glory, a true soldier in the battle against ignorance and so against want and crime. * * * * * justus liebig was born at darmstadt, on the th of may . the main facts which mark his life regarded apart from his work as a chemist are soon told. showing a taste for making experiments he was apprenticed by his father to an apothecary. fortunately for science he did not long remain as a concoctor of drugs, but was allowed to enter the university of bonn as a student of medicine. from bonn he went to erlangen, at which university he graduated in . a year or two before this time liebig had begun his career as an investigator of nature, and he had already made such progress that the grand duke of hesse-darmstadt was prevailed on to grant him a small pension and allow him to prosecute his researches at paris, which was then almost the only place where he could hope to find the conditions of success for the study of scientific chemistry. to paris accordingly he went in . he was so fortunate--thanks to the good graces of the renowned naturalist alexander von humboldt--as to be allowed to enter the laboratory of gay-lussac, where he continued the research on a class of explosive compounds, called _fulminates_, which he had begun before leaving darmstadt. a year later liebig was invited to return to his native country as professor of chemistry in the small university of giessen--a name soon to be known wherever chemistry was studied, and now held dear by many eminent chemists who there learned what is meant by the scientific study of nature. the year before liebig entered the laboratory of gay-lussac there came to paris a young and enthusiastic student who had already made himself known in the scientific world by his physiological researches, and who was now about to begin his career as a chemist. in that southern part of france which is rich in memories of the roman occupation, not far from the remains of the great aqueduct which spans the valley of the gardon, at no great distance from the famous cities of arles and nîmes, was born, in the town of alais, on the th of july , jean baptiste andrÉ dumas. the father of dumas was a man of considerable culture; he gave his son as good an education as could be obtained in the little town of his birth. at the age of fourteen young dumas was a good classical scholar, and had acquired a fair knowledge of natural science. but for his deficiency in mathematics he would probably have entered for the examination which admitted those who passed it to join the french navy. but before he had made good his mathematical deficiencies the troublous nature of the times ( - ) obliged his parents to think of some other profession for their son which would entail less sacrifice on their part. like his great fellow-worker in after life he was apprenticed to an apothecary, and like him also, he soon forsook this sphere of usefulness. desirous of better opportunities for the study of science, and overpowered by the miseries which war had brought upon the district of his birth, dumas persuaded his father to allow him to go to geneva. at geneva dumas found an atmosphere more suited to his scientific progress; chemistry, physics, botany, and other branches of natural science were taught by men whose names were everywhere known. he began experiments in chemistry with the crudest and most limited apparatus, but even with these he made discoveries which afterwards led to important work on the volumes occupied by the atoms of elementary substances. about the year dumas became acquainted with dr. j. l. prévost, who had returned from studying in many of the most famous medical schools of europe. invited by prévost to join in an investigation requiring medical, botanical and chemical knowledge, dumas now began a series of researches which soon passed into the domain of animal physiology, and by the prosecution of which under many difficulties he laid the foundations of his future fame. but along with his physiological work dumas carried on a research into the expansion of various ethers. this necessitated the preparation of a series of ethers in a state of purity; but so difficult did dumas find this to be, so much time did he consume in this preliminary work, and so interested did he become in the chemical part of the investigation, that he abandoned the experiments on expansion, and set himself to solve some of the problems presented by the composition and chemical properties of the ethers. dumas would probably have remained in geneva had he not had a morning visit paid him in the year . when at work in his laboratory one day, some one knocked and was bidden come in. "i was surprised to find myself face to face with a gentleman in a light-blue coat with metal buttons, a white waistcoat, nankeen breeches, and top-boots.... the wearer of this costume, his head somewhat bent, his eyes deep-set but keen, advanced with a pleasant smile, saying, 'monsieur dumas.' 'the same, sir; but excuse me.' 'i am m. de humboldt, and did not wish to pass through geneva without having had the pleasure of seeing you.'... i had only one chair. my visitor was pleased to accept it, whilst i resumed my elevated perch on the drawing stool.... 'i intend,' said m. de humboldt, 'to spend some days in geneva, to see old friends and to make new ones, and more especially to become acquainted with young people who are beginning their career. will you act as my cicerone? i warn you however that my rambles begin early and end late. now, could you be at my disposal, say from six in the morning till midnight?'" after some days spent as humboldt had indicated the great naturalist left geneva. dumas tells us that the town seemed empty to him. "i felt as if spell-bound. the memorable hours i had spent with that irresistible enchanter had opened a new world to my mind." dumas felt that he must go to paris--that there he would have more scope and more opportunities for prosecuting science. a few kind words, a little genuine sympathy, and a little help from humboldt were thus the means of fairly launching in their career of scientific inquiry these two young men, liebig and dumas. in paris, whither he went in , dumas found a welcome. he soon made the acquaintance and gained the friendship of the great men who then made natural science so much esteemed in the french capital. when the year came, it saw him professor of chemistry at the athenæum, and married to the lady whom he loved, and who has ever since fought the battle of life by his side. liebig left paris in . by the year he had perfected and applied that method for the analysis of organic compounds which is now in constant use wherever organic chemistry is studied; by the same year dumas had given the first warning of the attack which he was about to make on the great structure of dualism raised by berzelius. in a paper, "on some points of the atomic theory," published in , dumas adopted the distinction made by avogadro between molecules and atoms, or between the small particles of substances which remain undivided during physical actions, and the particles, smaller than these, which are undivided during chemical actions. but, unfortunately, dumas did not mark these two conceptions by names sufficiently definite to enable the readers of his memoir to bear the distinction clearly in mind. the terms "atom" and "molecule" were not introduced into chemistry with the precise meanings now attached to them until some time after . although the idea of two orders of small particles underlies all the experimental work described by dumas in this paper, yet the numbers which he obtained as representing the actual atomic weights of several elements--_e.g._ phosphorus, arsenic, tin, silicon--show that he had not himself carried out avogadro's hypothesis to its legitimate conclusions. two years after this dumas employed the reaction wherein two volumes of gaseous hydrochloric acid are produced by the union of one volume of hydrogen with one volume of chlorine, as an argument which obliged him to conclude that, if avogadro's physical hypothesis be accepted, the molecules of hydrogen and chlorine split, each into two parts, when these gases combine chemically. but dumas did not at this time conclude that the molecular weight of hydrogen must be taken as twice its atomic weight, and that--hydrogen being the standard substance--the molecular weights of all gases must be represented by the specific gravities of these gases, referred to hydrogen as . i have already shortly discussed the method for finding the relative weights of elementary atoms which is founded on avogadro's hypothesis, and, i think, have shown that this hypothesis leads to the definition of "atom" as the smallest amount of an element in one molecule of any compound of that element (see p. ). this deduction from avogadro's law is now a part and parcel of our general chemical knowledge. we wonder why it was not made by dumas; but we must remember that a great mass of facts has been accumulated since , and that this definition of "atom" has been gradually forced on chemists by the cumulative evidence of those facts. one thing dumas did do, for which the thanks of every chemist ought to be given him; he saw the need of a convenient method for determining the densities of compounds in the gaseous state, and he supplied this need by that simple, elegant and trustworthy method, still in constant use, known as _dumas's vapour density process_. while dumas was working out the details of this analytical method, which was destined to be so powerful an instrument of research, liebig was engaged in similar work; he was perfecting that process for the analysis of organic compounds which has since played so important a part in the advancement of this branch of chemical science. the processes in use during the first quarter of this century for determining the amounts of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen in compounds of those elements, were difficult to conduct and gave untrustworthy results. liebig adopted the principle of the method used by lavoisier, viz. that the carbon in a compound can be oxidized, or burnt, to carbonic acid, and the hydrogen to water. he contrived a very simple apparatus wherein this burning might be effected and the products of the burning--carbonic acid and water--might be arrested and weighed. liebig's apparatus remains now essentially as it was presented to the chemical world in . various improvements in details have been made; the introduction of gas in place of charcoal as a laboratory fuel has given the chemist a great command over the process of combustion, but in every part of the apparatus to-day made use of in the laboratory is to be traced the impress of the master's hand. a weighed quantity of the substance to be analyzed is heated with oxide of copper in a tube of hard glass; the carbon is burnt to carbonic acid and the hydrogen to water at the expense of the oxygen of the copper oxide. attached to the combustion tube is a weighed tube containing chloride of calcium, a substance which greedily combines with water, and this tube is succeeded by a set of three or more small bulbs, blown in one piece of glass, and containing an aqueous solution of caustic potash, a substance with which carbonic acid readily enters into combination. the chloride of calcium tube and the potash bulbs are weighed before and after the experiment; the increase in weight of the former represents the amount of water, and the increase in weight of the latter the amount of carbonic acid obtained by burning a given weight of the compound under examination. as the composition of carbonic acid and of water is known, the amounts of carbon and of hydrogen in one hundred parts of the compound are easily found; the difference between the sum of these and one hundred represents the amount of oxygen in one hundred parts of the compound. if the compound should contain elements other than these three, those other elements are determined by special processes, the oxygen being always found by difference. soon after his settlement at giessen liebig turned his attention to a class of organic compounds known as the _cyanates_; but wöhler--who, while liebig was in paris in the laboratory of gay-lussac, was engaged in studying the intricacies of mineral chemistry under the guidance of berzelius--had already entered on this field of research. the two young chemists compared notes, recognized each other's powers, and became friends; this friendship strengthened as life advanced, and some of the most important papers which enriched chemical science during the next thirty years bore the joint signatures of liebig and wöhler. i have already mentioned that when it was found necessary to abandon the lavoisierian definition of organic chemistry as the chemistry of compounds containing carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, and sometimes also phosphorus or nitrogen, a definition was attempted to be based on the supposed fact that the formation of the compounds obtained from animals and plants could be accomplished only by the agency of a living organism. but the discovery made in by wöhler, that _urea_--a substance specially characterized by its production in the animal economy, and in that economy only--could be built up from mineral materials, rendered this definition of organic chemistry impossible, and broke down the artificial barrier whereby naturalists attempted to separate two fields of study between which nature made no division. we have here another illustration of the truth of the conception which underlies so many of the recent advances of science, which is the central thought of the noble structure reared by the greatest naturalist of our time, and which is expressed by one of the profoundest students of nature that this age has seen in the words i have already quoted from the preface to the "lyrical ballads," "in nature everything is distinct, but nothing defined into absolute independent singleness." from this time the progress of organic chemistry became rapid. dumas continued the researches upon ethers which he had commenced at geneva, and by the year or so he had established the relations which exist between ethers and alcohols on the one hand, and ethers and acids on the other. this research, a description of the details of which i cannot introduce here as it would involve the use of many technical terms and assume the possession by the reader of much technical knowledge, was followed by others, whereby dumas established the existence of a series of compounds all possessed of the chemical properties of alcohol, all containing carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, but differing from one another by a constant amount of carbon and hydrogen. this discovery of a series of alcohols, distinguished by the possession of certain definite properties whereby they were marked off from all other so-called organic compounds, was as the appearance of a landmark to the traveller in a country where he is without a guide. the introduction of the comparative method of study into organic chemistry--the method, that is, which bases classification on a comparison of large groups of compounds, and which seeks to gather together those substances which are like and to separate those which are unlike--soon began to bear fruit. this method suggested to the experimenter new points of view from which to regard groups of bodies; analogies which were hidden when a few substances only were considered, became prominent as the range of view was widened. what the gentle elia calls "fragments and scattered pieces of truth," "hints and glimpses, germs, and crude essays at a system," became important. there was work to be done, not only by the master spirits who, looking at things from a central position of vantage, saw the relative importance of the various detailed facts, but also by those who could only "beat up a little game peradventure, and leave it to knottier heads, more robust constitutions, to run it down." twenty years before the time of which we are now speaking davy had decomposed the alkalis potash and soda; as he found these substances to be metallic oxides, he thought it very probable that the other well-known alkali, ammonia, would also turn out to be the oxide of a metal. by the electrolysis of salts formed by the action of ammonia on acids, using mercury as one of the poles of the battery, davy obtained a strange-looking spongy substance which he was inclined to regard as an alloy of the metallic base of ammonia with mercury. from the results of experiments by himself and others, davy adopted a view of this alloy which regarded it as containing a _compound radicle_, or group of elementary atoms which in certain definite chemical changes behaved like a single elementary atom. to this compound radicle he gave the name of _ammonium_. as an aqueous solution of potash or soda was regarded as a compound of water and oxide of potassium or sodium, so an aqueous solution of ammonia was regarded as a compound of water and oxide of ammonium. when the composition of this substance, ammonium, came to be more accurately determined, it was found that it might be best represented as a compound atom built up of one atom of nitrogen and four atoms of hydrogen. the observed properties of many compounds obtained from ammonia, and the analogies observed between these and similar compounds obtained from potash and soda, could be explained by assuming in the compound atom (or better, in the molecule) of the ammonia salt, the existence of this group of atoms, acting as one atom, called ammonium. the reader will not fail to observe how essentially atomic is this conception of compound radicle. the ultimate particle, the molecule, of a compound has now come to be regarded as a structure built up of parts called atoms, just as a house is a structure built up of parts called stones and bricks, mortar and wood, etc. but there may be a closer relationship between some of the atoms in this molecule than between the other atoms. it may be possible to remove a group of atoms, and put another group--or perhaps another single atom--in the place of the group removed, without causing the whole atomic structure to fall to pieces; just as it may be possible to remove some of the bricks from the wall of a house, or a large wooden beam from beneath the lintels, and replace these by other bricks or by a single stone, or replace the large wooden beam by a smaller iron one, without involving the downfall of the entire house. the group of atoms thus removable--the compound radicle--may exist in a series of compounds. as we have an oxide, a sulphide, a chloride, a nitrate, etc., of sodium, so we may have an oxide, a sulphide, a chloride, a nitrate, etc., of ammonium. the compounds of sodium are possessed of many properties in common; this is partly explained by saying that they all contain one or more atoms of the element sodium. the compounds of ammonium possess many properties in common, and this is partly explained if we assume that they all contain one or more atoms of the compound radicle ammonium. the conception of compound radicle was carried by berzelius to its utmost limits. we have learned that the swedish chemist regarded every molecule as composed of two parts; in very many cases each of these parts was itself made up of more than one kind of atom--it was a compound radicle. but the berzelian system tended to become too artificial: it drifted further and further away from facts. of the two parts composing the dual molecular structure, one was of necessity positively, and the other negatively electrified. the greater number of the so-called organic compounds contained oxygen; oxygen was the most electro-negative element known; hence most organic compounds were regarded as formed by the coming together of one, two, or more atoms of oxygen, forming the negative part of the molecule, with one, two, or more atoms of a compound radicle, which formed the positive part of the molecule. from this dualistic view of the molecule there naturally arose a disposition to regard the compound radicles of organic chemistry as the non-oxygenated parts of the molecules of organic compounds. an organic compound came gradually to be regarded as a compound of oxygen with some other elements, which were all lumped together under the name of a compound radicle, and organic chemistry was for a time defined as the chemistry of compound radicles. from what has been said on p. , i think it will be evident that the idea of _substitution_ is a necessary part of the original conception of compound radicle; a group of atoms in a molecule may, it is said, be removed, and another group, or another atom, _substituted_ for that which is removed. berzelius adopted this idea, but he made it too rigid; he taught that an electro-negative atom, or compound radicle, could be replaced or substituted only by another electro-negative atom or group of atoms, and a positively electrified atom or group of atoms, only by another electro-positive atom or compound radicle. thus oxygen could perhaps be replaced by chlorine, but certainly not by hydrogen; while hydrogen might be replaced by a positively electrified atom, but certainly not by chlorine. the conceptions of compound radicles and of substitution held some such position in organic chemistry as that which i have now attempted to indicate when dumas and liebig began their work in this field. the visitors at one of the royal _soirées_ at the tuileries were much annoyed by the irritating vapours which came from the wax candles used to illuminate the apartments; dumas was asked to examine the candles and find the reason of their peculiar behaviour. he found that the manufacturer had used chlorine to bleach the wax, that some of this chlorine remained in the candles, and that the irritating vapours which had annoyed the guests of charles x. contained hydrochloric acid, produced by the union of chlorine with part of the hydrogen of the wax. candles bleached by some other means than chlorine were in future used in the royal palaces; and the unitary theory, which was to overthrow the dualism of berzelius, began to arise in the mind of dumas. the retention of a large quantity of chlorine by wax could scarcely be explained by assuming that the chlorine was present only as a mechanically held impurity. dumas thoroughly investigated the action of chlorine on wax and other organic compounds; and in he announced that hydrogen in organic compounds can be exchanged for chlorine, every volume of hydrogen given up by the original compound being replaced by an equal volume of chlorine. liebig and wöhler made use of a similar conception to explain the results which they had obtained about this time in their study of the oil of bitter almonds, a study which will be referred to immediately. the progress of this bold innovation made by dumas was much advanced by the experiments and reasonings of two french chemists, whose names ought always to be reverenced by students of chemistry as the names of a pair of brilliant naturalists to whom modern chemistry owes much. _gerhardt_ was distinguished by clearness of vision and expression; _laurent_ by originality, breadth of mind and power of speculation. laurent appears to have been the first who made a clear statement of the fundamental conception of the unitary theory: "many organic compounds, when treated with chlorine lose a certain number of equivalents of hydrogen, which passes off as hydrochloric acid. an equal number of equivalents of chlorine takes the place of the hydrogen so eliminated; thus the physical and chemical properties of the original substance are not profoundly changed. the chlorine occupies the place left vacant by the hydrogen; the chlorine plays in the new compound the same part as was played by the hydrogen in the original compound." the replacement of electro-positive hydrogen by electro-negative chlorine was against every canon of the dualistic chemistry; and to say that the physical and chemical properties of the original compound were not profoundly modified by this replacement, seemed to be to call in question the validity of the whole structure raised by the labours during a quarter of a century of one universally admitted to be among the foremost chemists of his age. but facts accumulated. by the action of chlorine on alcohol liebig obtained _chloroform_ and _chloral_, substances which have since been so largely applied to the alleviation of human suffering; but it was dumas who correctly determined the composition of these two compounds, and showed how they are related to alcohol and to one another. liebig's reception of the corrections made by dumas in his work furnishes a striking example of the true scientific spirit. "as an excellent illustration," said liebig, "of the mode in which errors should be corrected, the investigation of chloral by dumas may fitly be introduced. it carried conviction to myself, as i think to everybody else, not by the copious number of analytical data opposed to the not less numerous results which i had published, but because these data gave a simpler explanation both of the formation and of the changes of the substances in question." one of the most important contributions to the new views was made by dumas in his paper on the action of chlorine on acetic acid ( ), wherein he proved that the product of this action, viz. _trichloracetic acid_, is related to the parent substance by containing three atoms of chlorine in place of three atoms of hydrogen in the molecule; that the new substance is, like the parent substance, a monobasic acid; that its salts are very analogous in properties to the salts of acetic acid; that the action of the same reagents on the two substances is similar; and finally, that the existence of many derivatives of these compounds could be foretold by the help of the new hypothesis, which derivatives ought not to exist according to the dualistic theory, but which, unfortunately for that theory, were prepared and analyzed by dumas. i have alluded to a research by liebig and wöhler on oil of bitter almonds as marking an important stage in the advance of the anti-dualistic views. the paper alluded to was published in . at that time it was known that _benzoic acid_ is formed by exposure of bitter-almond oil to the air. liebig and wöhler made many analyses of these two substances, and many experiments on the mutual relations of their properties, whereby they were led to regard the molecules of the oil as built up each of an atom of hydrogen and an atom of a compound radicle--itself a compound of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen--to which they gave the name of _benzoyl_.[ ] benzoic acid they regarded as a compound of the same radicle with another radicle, consisting of equal numbers of oxygen and hydrogen atoms. by the action of chlorine and other reagents on bitter-almond oil these chemists obtained substances which were carefully analyzed and studied, and the properties of which they showed could be simply explained by regarding them all as compounds of the radicle _benzoyl_ with chlorine and other atoms or groups of atoms. but this view, if adopted, necessitated the belief that chlorine atoms could replace oxygen atoms; and, generally, that the substitution of an electro-positive by a negative atom or group of atoms did not necessarily cause any great alteration in the properties of the molecule. thus it was that the rigid conceptions of dualism were shown to be too rigid; that the possibility of an electro-positive radicle, or atom, replacing another of opposite electricity was recognized; and thus the view which regarded a compound molecule as one structure--atoms in which might be replaced by other atoms irrespective of the mutual electrical relations of these atoms--began to gain ground. from this time the molecule of a compound has been generally regarded as a unitary structure, as one whole, and the properties of the molecule as determined by the nature, number, and arrangement of all the atoms which together compose it. the unitary conception of a compound molecule appeared at first to be altogether opposed to the system of berzelius; but as time went on, and as fresh facts came to be known, it was seen that the new view conserved at least one, and that perhaps the most important, of the thoughts which formed the basis of the berzelian classification. underlying the dualism of berzelius was the conception of the molecule as an atomic structure; this was retained in the unitary system of dumas, gerhardt and laurent. berzelius had insisted that every molecule is a dual structure. this is taking too narrow a view of the possibilities of nature, said the upholders of the new school. _this_ molecule may have a dual structure; _that_ may be built up of three parts. the structure of this molecule or of that can be determined only by a careful study of its relations with other molecules. for a time it seemed also as if the new chemistry could do without the compound radicle which had been so much used by berzelius; but the pressure of facts soon drove the unitary chemists to recognize the value of that hypothesis which looked on parts of the molecule as sometimes more closely associated than other parts--which recognized the existence of atomic structures within the larger molecular structures. as a house is not simply a putting together of so many bricks, so much mortar, so many doors and windows, so many leaden pipes, etc., but rather a definite structure composed of parts, many of which are themselves also definite structures, such as the window and its accessory parts, the door with its lintel and handle, etc., so to the unitary chemists did the molecule appear to be built up of parts, some of which, themselves composed of yet smaller parts, discharged a particular function in the molecular economy. a general division of a plant might describe it as a structure consisting of a stem, a root, and leaves. each of the parts, directly by its individual action and indirectly by the mutual action between it and all the other parts, contributes to the growth of the whole plant; but if the stem, or root, or leaves be further analyzed, each is found to consist of many parts, of fibres and cells and tissue, etc. we may liken the plant to the molecule of an organic compound; the root, the stem and the leaves to the compound radicles of which this molecule is built up, and the tissue, fibres, etc., to the elementary atoms which compose these compound radicles. the molecule is one whole, possessed of definite structure and performing a definite function by virtue of the nature and the arrangement of its parts. many years elapsed after the publication of the researches of dumas, and of liebig and wöhler, before such a conception of the molecule as this was widely accepted by chemists. the opposition of the older school, headed by their doughty champion berzelius, had to be overcome; the infallibility of some of the younger members of the new school had to be checked; facts had to be accumulated, difficulties explained, weak analogies abandoned and strong ones rendered stronger by research; special views of the structure of this or that molecule, deduced from a single investigation, had to be supplemented and modified by wider views gained by the researches of many workers. it was not till that liebig, when asked by dumas at a dinner given during the french exhibition to the foreign chemists, why he had abandoned organic chemistry, replied that "now, with the theory of substitution as a foundation, the edifice may be built up by workmen: masters are no longer needed." laurent and gerhardt did noble work in advancing the unitary theory; to them is largely due the fruitful conception of types, an outcome of dumas's work, which owed its origin to the flickering of the wax candles in the tuileries during the royal _soirée_. chlorine can be substituted for hydrogen in acetic acid, and the product is closely related in its properties to the parent substance; various atoms or groups of atoms can be substituted by other groups in the derivatives of oil of bitter almonds, but a close analogy in properties runs through all these compounds: these facts might be more shortly expressed by saying that acetic and trichloracetic acids belong to the same _type_, and that the derivatives of bitter-almond oil likewise belong to one _type_. laurent carried this conception into inorganic chemistry. water and potash did not seem to have much in common, but laurent said potash is not a compound of oxide of potassium and water, it is rather a derivative of water. the molecule of potash is derived from that of water by replacing one atom of hydrogen in the latter by one atom of potassium; water and potash belong to the same type. thus there was constituted _the water type_. light was at once thrown on many facts in organic chemistry. the analogies between alcohol and water, some of which were first pointed out by graham (see p. ), seemed to follow as a necessary consequence when the molecule of alcohol was regarded as built on the water type. in place of two atoms of hydrogen combined with one of oxygen, there was in the alcohol molecule one atom of the compound radicle _ethyl_ (itself composed of carbon and hydrogen), one atom of oxygen and one of hydrogen. alcohol was water with one hydrogen atom substituted by one ethyl atom; the hydrogen atom was the atom of what we call an element, the ethyl was the atom of what we call a compound radicle. gerhardt sought to refer all organic compounds to one or other of three types--the water type, the hydrochloric acid type, and the ammonia type. as new compounds were prepared and examined, other types had to be introduced. to follow the history of this conception would lead us into too many details; suffice it to say that the theory of types was gradually merged in the wider theory of equivalency, about which i shall have a little to say in the next chapter. one result of the introduction of types into chemical science, associated as it was with the unitary view of compound radicles, was to overthrow that definition of organic chemistry which had for some time prevailed, and which stated that organic chemistry is "the chemistry of compound radicles." compound radicles, it is true, were more used in explaining the composition and properties of substances obtained from animals and vegetables than of mineral substances, but a definition of one branch of a science which practically included the other branch, from which the first was to be defined, could not be retained. chemists became gradually convinced that a definition of organic chemistry was not required; that there was no distinction between so-called organic and inorganic compounds; and they have consented, but i scarcely think will much longer consent, to retain the terms "organic" and "inorganic," only because these terms have been so long in use. the known compounds of the element carbon are so numerous, and they have been so much studied and so well classified, that it has become more convenient for the student of chemistry to consider them as a group, to a great extent apart from the compounds of the other elements; to this group he still often gives the name of "organic compounds." * * * * * liebig continued to hold the chair of chemistry in the university of giessen until the year , when he was induced by the king of bavaria to accept the professorship of the same science in the university of munich. during the second quarter of this century giessen was much resorted to by students of chemistry from all parts of the world, more especially from england. many men who afterwards made their mark in chemical discovery worked under the guidance of the professor of stockholm, but giessen has the honour of being the place where a well-appointed chemical laboratory for scientific research was first started as a distinctly educational institution. the fame of liebig as a discoverer and as a teacher soon filled the new institution with students, who were stirred to enthusiasm as they listened to his lectures, or saw him at work in his laboratory. "liebig was not exactly what is called a fluent speaker," says professor hofmann, of berlin, "but there was an earnestness, an enthusiasm in all he said, which irresistibly carried away the hearer. nor was it so much the actual knowledge he imparted which produced this effect, as the wonderful manner in which he called forth the reflective powers of even the least gifted of his pupils. and what a boon was it, after having been stifled by an oppressive load of facts, to drink the pure breath of science such as it flowed from liebig's lips! what a delight, after having perhaps received from others a sack full of dry leaves, suddenly in liebig's lectures to see the living, growing tree!... we felt then, we feel still, and never while we live shall we forget, liebig's marvellous influence over us; and if anything could be more astonishing than the amount of work he did with his own hands, it was probably the mountain of chemical toil which he got us to go through. each word of his carried instruction, every intonation of his voice bespoke regard; his approval was a mark of honour, and of whatever else we might be proud, our greatest pride of all was having him for our master.... of our young winnings in the noble playground of philosophical honour, more than half were free gifts to us from liebig, and to his generous nature no triumphs of his own brought more sincere delight than that which he took in seeing his pupils' success, and in assisting, while he watched, their upward struggle." liebig had many friends in england. he frequently visited this country, and was present at several meetings of the british association. at the meeting of he was asked to draw up a report on the progress of organic chemistry; he complied, and in presented the world with a book which marks a distinct epoch in the applications of science to industrial pursuits--"chemistry in its applications to agriculture and physiology." in this book, and in his subsequent researches and works,[ ] liebig established and enforced the necessity which exists for returning to the soil the nourishing materials which are taken from it by the growth of crops; he suggested that manure rich in the salts which are needed by plants might be artificially manufactured, and by doing this he laid the foundation of a vast industry which has arisen during the last two decades. he strongly and successfully attacked the conception which prevailed among most students of physiology at that time, that chemical and physical generalizations could not be applied to explain the phenomena presented by the growth of living organisms. he was among the first to establish, as an induction from the results of many and varied experiments, the canon which has since guided all teachers of the science of life, that a true knowledge of biology must be based on a knowledge of chemistry and physics. but liebig was not content to establish broad generalizations and to leave the working out of them to others; he descended from the heights of philosophical inquiry, and taught the housewife to make soup wherein the greatest amount of nourishment was conveyed to the invalid in the most easily digestible form; and has he not, by bringing within the reach of every one a portion of the animal nourishment which else had run to waste in the pampas of south america or the sheep-runs of australia, made his name, in every english home, familiar as a household word? on the death of berzelius in , it was to liebig that every chemist looked for a continuation of the annual report on the progress of chemistry, which had now become the central magazine of facts, whither each worker in the science could resort to make himself acquainted with what had been done by others on any subject which he proposed to investigate. from that time to the present day liebig's _annalen_ has been the leading chemical journal of the world. of the other literary work of liebig--of his essays, his celebrated "chemical letters," his many reports, his severe and sometimes harsh criticisms of the work of others--of the details of the three hundred original papers wherein he embodied the results of his researches, i have not time, nor would this be the place, to speak. honoured by every scientific society of any note in the world, crowned with the highest reward which england and france can offer to the man of science who is not an englishman or a frenchman--the copley medal and the associateship of the institute--honoured and respected by every student of science, loved by each of the band of ardent natures whom he had trained and sent forth to battle for the good of their race, and, best of all, working himself to the last in explaining the wonders of nature, he "passed into the silent land" on the th of april , leaving the memory of a life nobly devoted to the service of humanity, and the imperishable record of many truths added to the common stock of the race. * * * * * the life-work of dumas, other than that which i have already sketched, is so manifold and so varied, that to do more than refer to one or two leading points would carry us far beyond the limits within which i have tried to keep throughout this book. in one of his earliest papers dumas adopted the atomic theory as the corner-stone of his chemical system; he was thus led to an experimental revision of the values generally accepted for the atomic weights of some of the elements. among these revisions, that of the atomic weight of carbon holds a most important place, partly because of the excellency of the work, but more because of the other inquiries to which this work gave rise. dumas's experiments were summed up in the statement that the atom of carbon is twelve times heavier than the atom of hydrogen. the experimental methods and the calculations used in this determination involved a knowledge of the atomic weight of oxygen; in order accurately to determine the value to be assigned to this constant, dumas, in conjunction with boussingault, undertook a series of experiments on the synthesis of water, which forms one of the classical researches of chemistry, and wherein the number was established as representing the atomic weight of oxygen. stas, from experiments conducted at a later time with the utmost care and under conditions eminently fitted to gain accurate results, obtained the number · , in place of , for the atomic weight of oxygen; but in a paper recently published by the veteran dumas, a source of error is pointed out which stas had overlooked in his experiments, and it is shown that this error would tend slightly to increase the number obtained by stas. as the values assigned to the atomic weights of the elements are the very fundamental data of chemistry, and as we are every day more clearly perceiving that the mutual relations between the properties of elements and compounds are closely connected with the relative weights of the elementary atoms, we can scarcely lay too much stress on such work as this done by dumas and stas. not many years after the publication of dalton's "new system," the hypothesis was suggested by prout that the atomic weights of all the elements are represented by whole numbers--that of hydrogen being taken as unity--that the atom of each element is probably formed by the putting together of two, three, four, or more atoms of hydrogen, and that consequently there exists but a single elementary form of matter. among the upholders of this hypothesis dumas has held an important place. he modified the original statement of prout, and suggested that all atomic weights are whole multiples of half of that of hydrogen (that is, are whole multiples of / ). the experiments of stas seemed to negative this view, but later work--more especially the important critical revision of the results obtained by all the most trustworthy workers, conducted by professor clarke of cincinnati, and published by the smithsonian institution as part of their series of "constants of nature"--has shown that we are in no wise warranted by facts in rejecting prout's hypothesis as modified by dumas, but that the balance of evidence is at present rather in its favour. it would be altogether out of place to discuss here an hypothesis which leads to some of the most abstruse speculations as to the nature of matter in which chemists have as yet ventured to indulge. i mention it only because it illustrates the far-reaching nature of the researches of the chemist whose work we are now considering, and also because it shows the shallowness of the scoffs in which some partly educated people indulge when they see scientific men occupying themselves for years with attempts to solve such a minute and, as they say, trivial question as whether the number · or the number is to be preferred as representing the atomic weight of oxygen; "for in every speck of dust that falls lie hid the laws of the universe, and there is not an hour that passes in which you do not hold the infinite in your hand." another and very different subject, which has been placed on a firm basis by the researches of dumas, is the chemistry of fermentation. by his work on the action of beer-yeast on saccharine liquids, dumas proved liebig's view to be untenable--according to which the conversion of sugar into alcohol is brought about by the influence of chemical changes proceeding in the ferment; also that the view of berzelius, who regarded alcoholic fermentation as due simply to the contact of the ferment with the sugar, was opposed to many facts; and lastly, dumas showed that the facts were best explained by the view which regarded the change of sugar into alcohol as in no way different from other purely chemical changes, but as a change brought about, so far as our present knowledge goes, only by the agency of a growing organism of low form, such as yeast. in dumas established at his own expense a laboratory for chemical research. when the revolution of broke out dumas's means were much diminished, and he could no longer afford to maintain his laboratory. the closing of this place, where so much sound work had been done, was generally regarded as a calamity to science. about this time dumas received a visit from a person of unprepossessing appearance, who accosted him thus: "they assert that you have shut up your laboratory, but you have no right to do so. if you are in need of money, there," throwing a roll of bank-notes on the table, "take what you want. do not stint yourself; i am rich, a bachelor, and have but a short time to live." dumas's visitor turned out to be dr. jecker. he assured dumas that he was now only paying a debt, since he had made a fortune by what he had learnt in the medical schools of paris. dumas could not however in those troublous times turn his mind continuously to experimental research, and therefore declined dr. jecker's offer with many protestations of good will and esteem. new work now began to press upon dumas; his energy and his administrative powers were demanded by the state. elected a member of the national assembly in , he was soon called by the president of the republic to office as minister of agriculture and commerce. he was made a senator under the second empire. he entered the municipal council of paris about , and was soon elected to the presidency. under his presidency the great scheme for providing paris with spring-water carried by aqueducts and tunnels was successfully accomplished; many improvements were made in the drainage of the city; the cost of gas was decreased, while the quality was improved, the constancy of the supply insured, and the appliances for burning the gas in the streets were altered and rendered more effective. nominated to succeed pelouze as master of the mint in , dumas held this honourable and important position only until the franco-german war of . since that date he has relinquished political life; but as permanent secretary of the academy dumas now fills the foremost place in all affairs connected with science, whether pure or applied, in the french capital. in the work of these two chemists, liebig and dumas, we find admirable illustrations of the scientific method of examining natural appearances. in the broad general views which they both take of the phenomena to be studied, and the patient and persevering working out of details, we have shown us the combination of powers which are generally found in separate individuals. dumas has always insisted on the need of comparing properties and reactions of groups of bodies, before any just knowledge can be gained as to the position of a single substance in the series studied by the chemist. it has been his aim as a teacher, we are assured by his friend, professor hofmann, never to present to his students "an isolated phenomenon, or a notion not logically linked with others." to him each chemical compound is one in a series which connects it directly with many other similar compounds, and indirectly with other more or less dissimilar compounds. amid the overwhelming mass of facts which threaten nowadays to bury the science of chemistry, and crush the life out of it by their weight, dumas tracks his way by the aid of general principles; but these principles are themselves generalized from the facts, and are not the offspring of his own fancy. we have, i think, found that throughout the progress of chemical science two dangers have beset the student. he has been often tempted to accumulate facts, to amass analytical details, to forget that he is a chemist in his desire to perfect the instrument of analysis by the use of which he raises the scaffolding of his science; on the other hand, he has been sometimes allured from the path of experiment by his own day-dreams. the discoveries of science have been so wonderful, and the conceptions of some of those who have successfully prosecuted science have been so grand, that the student has not unfrequently been tempted to rest in the prevailing theories of the day, and, forgetting that these ought only "to afford peaceful lodgings to the intellect for the time," he has rather allowed them to circumscribe it, until at last the mind "finds difficulty in breaking down the walls of what has become its prison, instead of its home." we may think that dumas fell perhaps slightly into the former of these errors, when he did not allow his imagination a little more scope in dealing with the conception of "atom" and "molecule," the difference between which he had apprehended but not sufficiently marked by the year (see p. ). we know, from his own testimony, that liebig once fell into the latter error and that the consequences were disastrous. "i know a chemist"--meaning himself--"who ... undertook an investigation of the liquor from the salt-works. he found iodine in it, and observed, moreover, that the iodide of starch turned a fiery yellow by standing over-night. the phenomenon struck him; he saturated a large quantity of the liquor with chlorine, and obtained from this, by distillation, a considerable quantity of a liquid which coloured starch yellow, and externally resembled chloride of iodine, but differed from this compound in many properties. he explained, however, every discrepancy with satisfaction to himself; he contrived for himself a theory. several months later, he received a paper of m. balard's," announcing the discovery of bromine, "and on that same day he was able to publish the results of experiments on the behaviour of bromine with iron, platinum, and carbon; for balard's bromine stood in his laboratory, labelled _liquid chloride of iodine_. since that time he makes no more theories unless they are supported and confirmed by trustworthy experiments; and i can positively assert that he has not fared badly by so doing." another point which we notice in the life-work of these two chemists is their untiring labour. they were always at work; wherever they might be, they were ready to notice passing events or natural phenomena, and to draw suggestions from these. as davy proved the elementary character of iodine and established many of the properties of this substance during a visit to paris, so we find dumas making many discoveries during brief visits paid to his friends' laboratories when on excursions away from paris. during a visit to aix-les-bains, he noticed that the walls of the bath-room were covered with small crystals of sulphate of lime. the waters of the bath, he knew, were charged with sulphuretted hydrogen, but they contained no sulphuric acid, nor could that acid be detected in the air of the bath-rooms. this observation was followed up by experiments which proved that a porous material, such as a curtain or an ordinary plastered wall, is able to bring about the union of oxygen with sulphuretted hydrogen, provided moisture be present and a somewhat high temperature be maintained. again, we find liebig and dumas characterized by great mental honesty. "there is no harm in a man committing mistakes," said liebig, "but great harm indeed in his committing none, for he is sure not to have worked.... an error you have become cognizant of, do not keep in your house from night till morning." students of science, more than any other men, ought to be ready to acknowledge and correct the errors into which they fall. it is not difficult for them to do this: they have only to be continually going to nature; for there they have a court of appeal always ready to hear their case, and to give an absolutely unbiased judgment: they have but to bring their theories and guesses to this judge to have them appraised at their true value. footnotes: [ ] "in reviewing once more the facts elicited by our inquiry, we find them arranged around a common centre, a group of atoms preserving intact its nature, amid the most varied associations with other elements. this stability, this analogy, pervading all the phenomena, has induced us to consider this group as a sort of compound element, and to designate it by the special name of _benzoyl_."--liebig and wöhler, . [ ] "animal chemistry, or chemistry in its applications to physiology and pathology," . "researches on the chemistry of food," . "the natural laws of husbandry," . chapter vii. modern chemistry. on p. i referred to the work of the german chemist richter, by which the _equivalents_ of certain acids and bases were established. those quantities of various acids which severally neutralized one and the same quantity of a given base, or those quantities of various bases which severally neutralized one and the same quantity of a given acid, were said to be equivalent. these were the quantities capable of performing a certain definite action. in considering the development of dumas's substitution theory, we found that laurent retained this conception of equivalency when he spoke of an equivalent of hydrogen being replaced by an equivalent of chlorine (see p. ). a certain weight of chlorine was able to take the place and play the part of a certain weight of hydrogen in a compound; these weights, of hydrogen and chlorine, were therefore equivalent. this conception has been much used since laurent's time, but it has for the most part been applied to the atoms of the elements. hydrogen being taken as the standard substance, the elements have been divided into groups, in accordance with the number of hydrogen atoms with which one atom of each element is found to combine. thus certain elements combine with hydrogen only in the proportion of one atom with one atom; others combine in the proportion of one atom with two atoms of hydrogen; others in the proportion of one atom with three atoms of hydrogen, and so on. the adjective _monovalent_, _divalent_, _trivalent_, etc., is prefixed to an element to denote that the atom of this element combines with one, or two, or three, etc., atoms of hydrogen to form a compound molecule. let us consider what is implied in this statement--"the nitrogen atom is trivalent." this statement, if amplified, would run thus: "one atom of nitrogen combines with three atoms of hydrogen to form a compound molecule." now, this implies ( ) that the atomic weight of nitrogen is known, and ( ) that the molecular weight, and the number of nitrogen and hydrogen atoms in the molecule, of a compound of nitrogen and hydrogen are also known. but before the atomic weight of an element can be determined, it is necessary (as we found on p. ) to obtain, analyze, and take the specific gravities of a series of gaseous compounds of that element. the smallest amount of the element (referred to hydrogen as unity) in the molecule of any one of these gases will then be the atomic weight of the element. when it is said that "the molecular weight, and the number of nitrogen and hydrogen atoms in the molecule, of a compound of nitrogen and hydrogen are known," the statement implies that the compound in question has been obtained in a pure state, has been analyzed carefully, has been gasefied, and that a known volume of the gas has been weighed. when therefore we say that "the nitrogen atom is trivalent," we sum up a large amount of knowledge which has been gained by laborious experiment. this classification of the elements into groups of equivalent atoms--which we owe to frankland, williamson, odling, and especially to kekulé--has been of much service especially in advancing the systematic study of the compounds of carbon. it helps to render more precise the conception which has so long been gaining ground of the molecule as a definite structure. a monovalent element is regarded as one the atom of which acts on and is acted on by only one atom of hydrogen in a molecule; a divalent as one, the atom of which acts on and is acted on by two atoms of hydrogen--or other monovalent element--in a molecule; a trivalent element as one, the atom of which acts on and is acted on by three atoms of hydrogen--or other monovalent element--in a molecule; and so on. the fact that there often exist several compounds of carbon, the molecules of which are composed of the same numbers of the same atoms, finds a partial explanation by the aid of this conception of the elementary atom as a little particle of matter capable of binding to itself a certain limited number of other atoms to form a compound molecule. for if the observed properties of a compound are associated with a certain definite arrangement of the elementary atoms within the molecules of that compound, it would seem that any alteration in this arrangement ought to be accompanied by an alteration in the properties of the compound; in other words, the existence of more than one compound of the same elements united in the same proportions becomes possible and probable. i have said that such compounds exist: let me give a few examples. the alchemists poured a stream of mercury on to molten sulphur, and obtained a black substance, which was changed by heat into a brilliantly red-coloured body. we now know that the black and the red compounds alike contain only mercury and sulphur, and contain these elements united in the same proportions. hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen and oxygen unite in certain proportions to produce a mobile, colourless, strongly acid liquid, which acts violently on the skin, causing blisters and producing great pain: if this liquid is allowed to stand for a little time in the air it becomes turbid, begins to boil, gets thicker, and at last explodes, throwing a white pasty substance about in all directions. this white solid is inodorous, is scarcely acid to the taste, and does not affect the skin; yet it contains the same elements, united in the same proportions, as were present in the strongly acid, limpid liquid from which it was produced. two substances are known each containing carbon and hydrogen united in the same proportions: one is a gas with strong and irritating odour, and exerting a most disagreeable action on the eyes; the other is a clear, limpid, pleasant-smelling liquid. phosphorus is a very poisonous substance: it readily takes fire in the air at ordinary temperatures, so that it must be kept under water; but a modification of phosphorus is known, containing no form of matter other than phosphorus, which is non-poisonous, does not take fire easily, and may be handled with safety. once more, there is a compound of nitrogen and oxygen which presents the appearance of a deep-red, almost black gas; there is also a compound of nitrogen and oxygen which is a clear, colourless gas; yet both contain the same elements united in the same proportions. but a detailed consideration of _isomerism_, _i.e._ the existence of more than one compound built up of the same amounts of the same elements yet possessing different properties, would lead us too far from the main path of chemical advance which we wish to trace. the chemist is to-day continually seeking to connect the properties of the bodies he studies with the molecular structures of these bodies; the former he can observe, a knowledge of the latter he must gain by reasoning on the results of operations and experiments. his guide--the guide of lavoisier and his successors--is this: "similarity of properties is associated with similarity of composition"--by "composition" he generally means molecular composition. many facts have been amassed of late years which illustrate the general statement that the properties of bodies are connected with the composition of those bodies. thus a distinct connection has been traced between the tinctorial power and the molecular composition of certain dye-stuffs; in some cases it has even become possible to predict how a good dye-stuff may be made--to say that, inasmuch as this or that chemical reaction will probably give rise to the production of this or that compound, the atoms in the molecule of which we believe to have a certain arrangement relatively to one another, so this reaction or that will probably produce a dye possessed of strong tinctorial powers. the compound to the presence of which madder chiefly owes its dyeing powers is called _alizarine_; to determine the nature of the molecular structure of this compound was, for many years, the object of the researches of chemists; at last, thanks especially to the painstaking zeal of two german chemists, it became fairly clear that alizarine and a compound of carbon and hydrogen, called _anthracene_, were closely related in structure. anthracene was obtained from alizarine, and, after much labour, alizarine was prepared from anthracene. anthracene is contained in large quantities in the thick pitch which remains when coal-tar is distilled; this pitch was formerly of little or no value, but as soon as the chemical manufacturer found that in this black objectionable mass there lay hidden enormous stores of alizarine, he no longer threw away his coal-tar pitch, but sold it to the alizarine manufacturer for a large sum. thus it has come to pass that little or no madder is now cultivated; madder-dyeing is now done by means of alizarine made from coal-tar: large tracts of ground, formerly used for growing the madder plant, are thus set free for the growth of wheat and other cereals. this discovery of a method for preparing alizarine artificially stimulated chemists to make researches into the chemical composition, and if possible to get to know something about the molecular structure of indigo. those researches have very recently resulted in the knowledge of a series of reactions whereby this highly valuable and costly dye-stuff may be prepared from certain carbon compounds which, like anthracene, are found in coal-tar. these examples, while illustrating the connection that exists between the composition and the properties of bodies, also illustrate the need there is for giving a scientific chemical training to the man who is to devote his life to chemical manufactures. pure and applied science are closely connected; he who would succeed well in the latter must have a competent and a practical knowledge of the former. that composition--molecular composition--and properties are closely related is generally assumed, almost as an axiom, in chemical researches nowadays. lavoisier defined acids as substances containing oxygen; davy regarded an acid as a compound the properties of which were conditioned by the nature and by the arrangement of all the elements which it contained; liebig spoke of acids as substances containing "replaceable" hydrogen; the student of the chemistry of the carbon compounds now recognizes in an organic acid a compound containing hydrogen, but also carbon and oxygen, and he thinks that the atoms of hydrogen (or some of these atoms) in the molecule of such a compound are, in some way, closely related to atoms of oxygen and less closely to atoms of carbon, within that molecule,--in other words, the chemist now recognizes that, for carbon compounds at any rate, acids are acid not only because they contain hydrogen, but also because that hydrogen is related in a definite manner within the molecule to other elementary atoms; he recognizes that the acid or non-acid properties of a compound are conditioned, not only by the nature of the elements which together form that compound, but also by the arrangement of these elements. davy's view of the nature of acids is thus confirmed and at the same time rendered more definite by the results of recent researches. the physical student is content to go no further than the molecule; the properties of bodies which he studies are regarded, for the most part, as depending on the size, the nature, and perhaps the grouping together of molecules. but the chemist seeks to go deeper than this. the molecule is too large a piece of matter for him; the properties which he studies are conceived by him to be principally conditioned by the nature, the number, and the arrangement of the parts of the molecule--of the atoms which together build up the molecule. in these elementary atoms he has, for the present, found the materials of which the heavens and the earth are made; but facts are being slowly gained which render it probable that these atoms are themselves structures--that they are built up of yet smaller parts, of yet simpler kinds of matter. to gather evidence for or against this supposition, the chemist has been obliged to go from the earth to the heavens, he has been obliged to form a new science, the science of spectroscopic analysis. this subject has been considered in "the astronomers," belonging to this series of books; but the point of view from which the matter is there regarded is astronomical rather than chemical. i should like briefly to recall to the reader the fundamental facts of this branch of science. [illustration: fig. .] when a ray of light is allowed to pass through a glass prism and then fall on to a white surface, the image produced on this surface consists of a many-coloured band of light. the blue or violet part of this band is more bent away from the plane of the entering ray than the orange part, and the latter more than the red part of the band. this is roughly represented in fig. , where _r_ is the ray of light passing through the prism p, and emerging as a sevenfold band of coloured lights, of which the violet, v, is most, and the red band, r, is least bent away from the plane of the ray _r_. if the surface--say a white screen--on which the many-coloured band of light, or _spectrum_, falls, is punctured by a small hole, so as to admit the passage of the violet, or blue, or orange, or red light only, and if this violet, etc., light is then passed through a second prism, no further breaking up of that light takes place. this state of matters is represented in the part of the figure towards the right hand, where the red ray, r, is shown as passing through the screen, and falling on to a second prism, p': the red ray is slightly bent out of its direct course, but is not subdivided; it falls on the second screen as a ray of red light, r'. but if a quantity of the metal sodium is vaporized in a hot non-luminous flame, and if the yellow light thus produced is passed through a prism, a spectrum is obtained consisting of a single yellow line (on a dark background), situated on that part of the screen where the orange-yellow band occurred when the ray of sunlight was split up by the action of the prism. in fig. the yellow light from a flame containing sodium is represented by the line y. the light emitted by the glowing sodium vapour is said to be _monochromatic_. [illustration: fig. ] lastly, if the experiment is arranged so that a ray of sunlight or of light from an electric lamp passes through a layer of comparatively cool sodium vapour before reaching the prism, a spectrum is produced corresponding to the solar spectrum except that a black line appears in the position where the yellow line, characteristic of sodium, was noticed in the second experiment. [illustration: fig. .] fig. represents the result of this experiment: the ray of sunlight or electric light, _r_, passes through a quantity of sodium vapour, and is then decomposed by the prism; the spectrum produced is marked by the absence of light (or by a dark line) where the yellow line, y, was before noticed. these are the fundamental facts of spectroscopic analysis: sunlight is decomposable into a band of many colours, that is, into a spectrum; light emitted by a glowing vapour is characterized by the presence of coloured lines, each of which occupies a definite position with reference to the various parts of the solar spectrum; sunlight--or the electric light--when allowed to pass through a mass of vapour, furnishes a spectrum characterized by the absence of those bright lines, the presence of which marked the spectrum of the light obtained by strongly heating the vapour through which the sunlight has passed. the spectrum obtained by decomposing the light emitted by glowing vapour of potassium is characterized by the presence of certain lines--call them a and b lines. we are asked what element (or elements) is present in a certain gas presented to us: we pass a beam of white light through this gas and then through a prism, and we obtain a continuous spectrum (_i.e._ a spectrum of many colours like the solar spectrum) with two dark lines in the same positions as those occupied by the lines a and b. we therefore conclude that the gas in question contains vapour of potassium. the solar spectrum, when carefully examined, is found to be crossed by a very large number of fine black lines; the exact positions of many hundreds of these lines have been carefully determined, and, in most cases, they are found to correspond to the positions of various bright lines noticed in the spectra of the lights emitted by hot vapours of various elementary bodies. assume that the sun consists, broadly speaking, of an intensely hot and luminous central mass, formed to a large extent of the elementary substances which build up this earth, and that this central mass is surrounded by a cooler (but yet very hot) gaseous envelope of the same elements,--and we have a tolerably satisfactory explanation of the principal phenomena revealed by the spectroscopic study of the sun's light. on this assumption the central mass of glowing iron, chromium, magnesium, nickel, cobalt, hydrogen, etc., is sending out light; a portion of the light emitted by the glowing iron is quenched as it passes through a cloud of cooler iron vapour outside the central mass, a portion of the light emitted by the glowing chromium is quenched as it passes through a cloud of cooler chromium vapour, and so on; the black lines in the spectrum are the records of these various quenchings of this and that light. so far then the study of the solar spectrum appears to be tolerably simple, and this study generally confirms the proposition that the material of which the sun is composed is, broadly, identical with those forms of matter which we, on this earth, call the chemical elements. but whatever be the composition of the sun, it is, i think, evident that in dealing with a ray of light coming therefrom, we are dealing with a very complex phenomenon. according to the hypothesis which is now guiding us, the solar light which passes into our spectroscope has probably had its beginning in some central part of the sun, and has passed through very thick layers of hot metallic clouds, agitated perhaps by solar cyclones. could we examine the light coming from some defined part of the sun, we should probably obtain valuable information. during a solar eclipse red prominences are seen projecting beyond the dark shadow of the moon, which covers the sun's disc. analysis of the light emitted by these prominences has shown that they are phenomena essentially belonging to the sun itself, and that they consist of vast masses of intensely hot, glowing gaseous substances, among which hydrogen is present in large quantities. that these prominences are very hot, hotter than the average temperature of the ordinary solar atmosphere, is proved by the fact that the spectrum of the light coming from them is characterized by bright lines. by special arrangements which need not be discussed here, but which have been partly explained in "the astronomers" (see pp. , of that book), it has been shown that these prominences are in rapid motion: at one moment they shoot up to heights of many thousand miles, at another they recede towards the centre of the sun. we thus arrive at a picture of the solar atmosphere as consisting of layers of very hot gases, which are continually changing their relative positions and forms; sometimes ejections of intensely hot, glowing gases occur,--we call these prominences; sometimes down-rushes of gaseous matter occur,--we call these spots. among the substances which compose the gaseous layers we recognize hydrogen, iron, magnesium, sodium, nickel, chromium, etc., but we also find substances which can at present be distinguished only by means of the wave-lengths of the light which they emit; thus we have stuff, stuff, stuff, etc. let us now turn to another part of this subject. by a special arrangement of apparatus it is possible to observe the spectrum of the light emitted by a glowing vapour, parts of which are hotter than other parts, and to compare the lines in the spectrum of the light coming from the hottest parts with the lines in the spectrum of the light coming from the cooler parts of the vapour. if this is done for sodium vapour, certain lines are apparent in all the spectra, others only in the spectrum of the light coming from the hottest parts of the sodium vapour: the former lines are called "long lines," the latter "short lines." a rough representation of the long and short lines of sodium is given in fig. . [illustration: fig. .--long and short lines of sodium.] now, suppose that the lines in the spectrum of the light emitted by glowing manganese vapour have been carefully mapped, and classed as long and short lines: suppose that the same thing has been done for the iron lines: now let a little manganese be mixed with much iron, let the mixture be vaporized, and let the light which is emitted be decomposed by the prism of a spectroscope, it will be found that the long lines of manganese alone make their appearance; let a little more manganese be added to the mixture, and now some of the shorter lines due to manganese begin to appear in the spectrum. hence it has been concluded by lockyer that if the spectrum of the light emitted by the glowing vapour of any element--call it a--is free from the long lines of any other element--say element b--this second element is not present as an impurity in the specimen of element a which is being examined. lockyer has applied this conclusion to "purify" various elementary spectra. the spectrum of element a is carefully mapped, and the lines are divided into long and short lines, according as they are noticed in the spectrum of the light coming from all parts of the glowing vapour of a, or only in the spectrum of the light which comes from the hotter parts of that vapour. the spectra of elements b and c are similarly mapped and classified: then the three spectra are compared; the longest line in the spectrum of b is noted, if this line is found in the spectrum of a, it is marked with a negative sign--this means that so far as the evidence of this line goes b is present as an impurity in a; the next longest b line is searched for in the spectrum of a--if present it also is marked with a negative sign; a similar process of comparison and elimination is conducted with the spectra of a and c. in this way a "purified" spectrum of the light from a is obtained--a spectrum, that is, from which, according to lockyer, all lines due to the presence of small quantities of b and c as impurities in a have been eliminated. [illustration: fig. .] fig. is given in order to make this "purifying" process more clearly understood. but when this process has been completed there remain, in many cases, a few short lines common to two or more elementary spectra: such lines are called by lockyer _basic lines_. he supposes that these lines are due to light emitted by forms of matter simpler than our elements; he thinks that at very high temperatures some of the elements are decomposed, and that the _bases_ of these elements are produced and give out light, which light is analyzed by the spectroscope. such short basic lines are marked in the spectra represented in fig. with a positive sign. now, if the assumption made by lockyer be admitted, viz. that the short lines, or some of the short lines, which are coincident in the "purified" spectra of various elements, are really due to light emitted by forms of matter into which our so-called elements are decomposed at very high temperatures, it follows that such lines should become more prominent in the spectra of the light emitted by elements the higher the temperature to which these elements are raised. but we know (see p. ) that the prominences around the sun's disc are hotter than the average temperature of the solar atmosphere; hence the spectrum of the light coming from these prominences ought to be specially rich in "basic" lines: this supposition is confirmed by experiment. lockyer has also shown that it is the "basic," and not the long lines, which are especially affected in the spectra of light coming from those parts of the solar atmosphere which are subjected to the action of cyclones, _i.e._ which are at abnormally high temperatures. and finally, a very marked analogy has been established between the changes in the spectrum of the light emitted by a compound substance as the temperature is raised, and the substance is gradually decomposed into its elements, and the spectrum of the light emitted by a so-called elementary substance as the temperature of that substance is increased. but it may be urged that lockyer's method of "purifying" a spectrum is not satisfactory; that, although all the longer lines common to two spectra are eliminated, the coincident short lines which remain are due simply to very minute quantities of one element present as an impurity in the larger quantity of the other. further, it has been shown that several of the so-called "basic" lines are resolved, by spectroscopes of great dispersive power, into groups of two or more lines, which lines are not coincident in different spectra. and moreover it is possible to give a fairly satisfactory explanation of the phenomena of solar chemistry without the aid of the hypothesis that our elements are decomposed in the sun into simpler forms of matter. nevertheless this hypothesis has a certain amount of experimental evidence in its favour; it may be a true hypothesis. i do not think we are justified at present either in accepting it as the best guide to further research, or in wholly rejecting it. the researches to which this hypothesis has given rise have certainly thrown much light on the constitution of the sun and stars, and they have also been instrumental in forcing new views regarding the nature of the elements on the attention of chemists, and so of awakening them out of the slumber into which every class of men is so ready to fall. the tale told by the rays of light which travel to this earth from the sun and stars has not yet been fully read, but the parts which the chemist has spelt out seem to say that, although the forms of matter of which the earth is made are also those which compose the sun and stars, yet in the sun and stars some of the earthly elements are decomposed, and some of the earthly atoms are split into simpler forms. the tale, i say, told by the rays of light seems to bear this interpretation, but it is written in a language strange to the children of this earth, who can read it as yet but slowly; for the name given to the new science was "_ge-urania_, because its production was of earth and heaven. and it could not taste of death, by reason of its adoption into immortal palaces; but it was to know weakness, and reliance, and the shadow of human imbecility; and it went with a lame gait; but in its going it exceeded all mortal children in grace and swiftness." there are certain little particles so minute that at least sixty millions of them are required to compose the smallest portion of matter which can be seen by the help of a good microscope. some of these particles are vibrating around the edge of an orb a million times larger than the earth, but at a distance of about ninety millions of miles away. the student of science is told to search around the edge of the orb till he finds these particles, and having found them, to measure the rates of their vibrations; and as an instrument with which to do this he is given--a glass prism! but he has accomplished the task; he has found the minute particles, and he has measured their vibration-periods. chemistry is no longer confined to this earth: the chemist claims the visible universe as his laboratory, and the sunbeams as his servants. davy decomposed soda and potash by using the powerful instrument given him by volta; but the chemist to-day has thrown the element he is seeking to decompose into a crucible, which is a sun or a star, and awaits the result. the alchemists were right. there is a philosopher's stone; but that stone is itself a compound of labour, perseverance, and genius, and the gold which it produces is the gold of true knowledge, which shall never grow dim or fade away. chapter viii. summary and conclusion. we have thus traced some of the main paths along which chemistry has advanced since the day when, ceasing to be guided by the dreams of men who toiled with but a single idea in the midst of a world of strange and complex phenomena, she began to recognize that nature is complex but orderly, and so began to be a branch of true knowledge. in this review we have, i think, found that the remark made at the beginning of the introductory chapter is, on the whole, a just one. that the views of the alchemists, although sometimes very noble, were "vague and fanciful" is surely borne out by the quotations from their writings given in the first chapter. this period was followed by that wherein the accurate, but necessarily somewhat narrow conception of the lavoisierian chemistry prevailed. founded for the most part on the careful, painstaking, and quantitative study of one phenomenon--a very wide and far-reaching phenomenon, it is true--it was impossible that the classification introduced by the father of chemical science should be broad enough to include all the discoveries of those who came after him. but although this classification had of necessity to be revised and recast, the genius of lavoisier enunciated certain truths which have remained the common possession of every chemical system. by proving that however the forms of matter may be changed the mass remains unaltered, he for the first time made a science of chemistry possible. he defined "element" once for all, and thus swept away the fabric of dreams raised by the alchemists on the visionary foundation of _earth_, _air_, _fire_ and _water_, or of _mercury_, _sulphur_ and _salt_. by his example, he taught that weighings and measurements must be made before accurate knowledge of chemical reactions can be hoped for; and by his teaching about oxygen being _the acidifier_--although we know that this teaching was erroneous in many details--he showed the possibility of a system of classification of chemical substances being founded on the actually observed properties and composition of those substances. lavoisier gained these most important results by concentrating his attention on a few subjects of inquiry. that chemistry might become broad it was necessary that it should first of all become narrower. the period when the objects of the science were defined and some of its fundamental facts and conceptions were established, was succeeded, as we saw in our sketch, by that in which dalton departed somewhat from the method of investigation adopted by most masters in science, and by concentrating his great mental powers on facts belonging to one branch of natural knowledge, elaborated a simple but very comprehensive theory, which he applied to explain the facts belonging to another branch of science. chemistry was thus endowed with a grand and far-reaching conception, which has been developed and applied by successive generations of investigators: but we must not forget that it was the thorough, detailed work of black and lavoisier which made possible the great theory of dalton. at the time when dalton was thinking out his theory of atoms, davy was advancing as a conqueror through the rich domain which the discovery of volta had opened to chemistry. dalton, trained to rely on himself, surrounded from his youth by an atmosphere in which "sweetness and light" did not predominate, thrown on the world at an early age, and obliged to support himself by the drudgery of teaching when he would fain have been engaged in research, and at the same time--if we may judge from his life as recorded by his biographers--without the sustaining presence of such an ideal as could support the emotional part of his nature during this time of struggle,--dalton, we found, withdrew in great part from contact with other scientific workers, and communing only with himself, developed a theory which, while it showed him to be one in the chain of thinkers that begins in democritus and leucippus, was nevertheless stamped with the undeniable marks of his own individuality and genius, and at the same time was untouched by any of the hopes or fears, and unaffected by any of the passions, of our common humanity. davy, on the other hand, was surrounded from childhood by scenes of great natural beauty and variety, by contact with which he was incited to eager desire for knowledge, while at the same time his emotions remained fresh and sensitive to outward impressions. entering on the study of natural science when there was a pause in the march of discovery, but a pause presageful of fresh advances, he found outward circumstances singularly favourable to his success; seizing these favourable circumstances he made rapid advances. like lavoisier, he began his work by proving that there is no such thing in nature as transmutation, in the alchemical meaning of the term; as lavoisier had proved that water is not changed into earth, so did davy prove that acid and alkali are not produced by the action of the electric current on pure water. we have shortly traced the development of the electro-chemical theory which davy raised on the basis of experiment; we have seen how facts obliged him to doubt the accepted view of the composition of hydrochloric acid and chlorine, and how by the work he did on these subjects chemists have been finally convinced that an element is not a substance which _cannot be_, but a substance which _has not been_ decomposed, and how from this work has also arisen the modern theory of acids, bases and salts. we found that, by the labours of the great swede j. j. berzelius, the daltonian theory was confirmed by a vast series of accurate analyses, and, in conjunction with a modification of the electro-chemical theory of davy, was made the basis of a system of classification which endeavoured to include all chemical substances within its scope. the atom was the starting-point of the berzelian system, but that chemist viewed the atom as a dual structure the parts of which held together by reason of their opposite electrical polarities. berzelius, we saw, greatly improved the methods whereby atomic weights could be determined, and he recognized the importance of physical generalizations as aids in finding the atomic weights of chemical substances. but berzelius came to believe too implicitly in his own view of nature's working; his theory became too imperious. chemists found it easier to accept than to doubt an interpretation of facts which was in great part undeniably true, and which formed a central luminous conception, shedding light on the whole mass of details which, without it, seemed confused and without meaning. if the dualistic stronghold was to be carried, the attack should be impetuous, and should be led by men, not only of valour, but also of discretion. we found that two champions appeared, and that, aided by others who were scarcely inferior soldiers to themselves, they made the attack, and made it with success. but when the heat of the battle was over and the bitterness of the strife forgotten, it was found that, although many pinnacles of the dualistic castle had been shattered, the foundation and great part of the walls remained; and, strange to say, the men who led the attack were content that these should remain. the atom could no longer be regarded as always composed of two parts, but must be looked on rather as one whole, the properties of which are defined by the properties and arrangements of all its parts; but the conception of the atom as a structure, and the assurance that something could be inferred regarding that structure from a knowledge of the reactions and general properties of the whole, remained when dumas and liebig had replaced the dualism of berzelius by the unitary theory of modern chemistry; and these conceptions have remained to the present day, and are now ranked among the leading principles of chemical science; only we now speak of the "molecule" where berzelius spoke of the "atom." along with these advances made by dumas, liebig and others in rendering more accurate the general conception of atomic structure, we found that the recognition of the existence of more than one order of small particles was daily gaining ground in the minds of chemists. the distinction between what we now call atoms and molecules had been clearly stated by avogadro in ; but the times were not ripe. the mental surroundings of the chemists of that age did not allow them fully to appreciate the work of avogadro. the seed however was sown, and the harvest, although late, was plentiful. we saw that dumas accepted, with some hesitation, the distinction drawn by avogadro, but that failing to carry it to its legitimate conclusion, he did not reap the full benefit of his acceptance of the principle that the smallest particle of a substance which takes part in a physical change divides into smaller particles in those changes which we call chemical. to gerhardt and laurent we owe the full recognition, and acceptance as the foundation of chemical classification, of the atom as a particle of matter distinct from the molecule; they first distinctly placed the law of avogadro--"equal volumes of gases contain equal numbers of molecules"--in its true position as a law, which, resting on physical evidence and dynamical reasoning, is to be accepted by the chemist as the basis of his atomic theory. to the same chemists we are indebted for the formal introduction into chemical science of the conception of types, which, as we found, was developed by frankland, kekulé, and others, into the modern doctrine of equivalency of groups of elementary atoms. we saw that, in the use which he made of the laws of mitscherlich, and of dulong and petit, berzelius recognized the importance of the aid given by physical methods towards solving the atomic problems of chemistry; but among those who have most thoroughly availed themselves of such aids graham must always hold a foremost place. graham devoted the energies of his life to tracking the movements of atoms and molecules. he proved that gases pass through walls of solid materials, as they pass through spaces already occupied by other gases; and by measuring the rapidities of these movements he showed how it was possible to determine the rate of motion of a particle of gas so minute that a group of a hundred millions of them would be invisible to the unassisted vision. graham followed the molecules as in their journeyings they came into contact with animal and vegetable membranes; he found that these membranes presented an insuperable barrier to the passage of some molecules, while others passed easily through. he thus arrived at a division of matter into colloidal and crystalloidal. he showed what important applications of this division might be made in practical chemistry, he discussed some of the bearings of this division on the general theory of the molecular constitution of matter, and thus he opened the way which leads into a new territory rich in promise to him who is able to follow the footsteps of its discoverer. other investigators have followed on the general lines laid down by graham; connections, more or less precise, have been established between chemical and physical properties of various groups of compounds. it has been shown that the boiling points, melting points, expansibilities by heat, amounts of heat evolved during combustion, in some cases tinctorial powers of dye-stuffs, and other physical constants of groups of compounds, vary with variations in the nature, number and arrangements of the atoms in the molecules of these compounds. but although much good work has been done in this direction, our ignorance far exceeds our knowledge regarding the phenomena which lie on the borderlands between chemistry and physics. it is probably here that chemists look most for fresh discoveries of importance. as each branch of natural science becomes more subdivided, and as the quantity of facts to be stored in the mind becomes daily more crushing, the student finds an ever-increasing difficulty in passing beyond the range of his own subject, and in gaining a broad view of the relative importance of the facts and the theories which to him appear so essential. in the days when the foundation of chemistry was laid by black, priestley, lavoisier and dalton, and when the walls began to be raised by berzelius and davy, it was possible for one man to hold in his mental grasp the whole range of subjects which he studied. even when liebig and dumas built the fabric of organic chemistry the mass of facts to be considered was not so overpowering as it is now. but we have in great measure ourselves to blame; we have of late years too much fulfilled liebig's words, when he said, that for rearing the structure of organic chemistry masters were no longer required--workmen would suffice. and i think we have sometimes fallen into another error also. most of the builders of our science--notably lavoisier and davy, liebig and dumas--were men of wide general culture. chemistry was for them a branch of natural science; of late years it has too much tended to degenerate into a handicraft. these men had lofty aims; they recognized--davy perhaps more than any--the nobility of their calling. the laboratory was to them not merely a place where curious mixtures were made and strange substances obtained, or where elegant apparatus was exhibited and carefully prepared specimens were treasured; it was rather the entrance into the temple of nature, the place where day by day they sought for truth, where, amid much that was unpleasant and much that was necessary mechanical detail, glimpses were sometimes given them of the order, harmony and law which reign throughout the material universe. it was a place where, stopping in the work which to the outsider appeared so dull and even so trivial, they sometimes, listening with attentive ear, might catch the boom of the "mighty waters rolling evermore," and so might return refreshed to work again. chemistry was more poetical, more imaginative then than now; but without imagination no great work has been accomplished in science. when a student of science forgets that the particular branch of natural knowledge which he cultivates is part of a living and growing organism, and attempts to study it merely as a collection of facts, he has already esau-like sold his birthright for a mess of pottage; for is it not the privilege of the scientific student of nature always to work in the presence of "something which he can never know to the full, but which he is always going on to know"--to be ever encompassed about by the greatness of the subject which he seeks to know? does he not recognize that, although some of the greatest minds have made this study the object of their lives, the sum of what is known is yet but as a drop in the ocean? and has he not also been taught that every honest effort made to extend the boundaries of natural knowledge must advance that knowledge a little way? it is not easy to remember the greatness of the issues which depend on scientific work, when that work is carried on, as it too often is, solely with the desire to gain a formal and definite answer to some question of petty detail. "that low man seeks a little thing to do, sees it and does it: this high man, with a great thing to pursue, dies ere he knows it. "that low man goes on adding one to one, his hundred's soon hit: this high man, aiming at a million, misses a unit." index. a acids, connected by lavoisier with oxygen, ; boyle's and other early definitions, ; opposed in early medicine to alkalis, ; grouped, ; salts, ; "the primordial acid," ; oxygen not a necessary constituent, ; new division of acids by davy, ; acids of different basicity, ; modern conception of acids, . affinity, chemical, apparently suspended by electricity, ; history of term "affinity," ; tables of, ; dependent on electric states, . air, composition of, determined by cavendish, ; dalton's investigations, . alchemy, ; alchemical symbols of metals, ; quotations from alchemists, , ; alchemical poetry, . alcoates, . alkalis, ; fixed and volatile, ; mild and caustic, examined by black, ; connection with earths, ; name of "base" given by rouelle, ; gay-lussac's alkalizing principle, . ammonia, discovered by priestley, . atmolysis, . atomic theory, dawn of, ; early views of greek philosophers, ; of epicurus and lucretius, ; of newton and bernoulli, ; dalton's new views--combination in simple multiples, , _et seq._; the theory made known by dr. thomson, ; it is opposed at first by davy, ; dalton's rules for arriving at atomic weights, ; more accurately applied by berzelius, , ; diagrams of atoms, , ; the theory as carried out by gay-lussac and avogadro, , _et seq._; conception of the molecule, ; molecular and atomic weight, ; graham's work on molecular reactions, ; berzelius's dualistic views, ; they are attacked by dumas, ; conception of the compound radicle, ; laurent's unitary theory, ; modern conception of molecule, ; revision of atomic weights, ; equivalency of atoms, . avogadro, his elucidation of the atomic theory, , _et seq._; introduces the idea of molecules, ; law known as avogadro's law, . b base (of salts), ; basic lines in spectrum, . becher, john j., born at speyer, ; his three principles of metals, ; his principle of inflammability, ; his views on acids, . berthollet, analyzes ammonia, ; adheres to the lavoisierian theory of combustion, ; questions doctrine of fixity of composition, ; and necessary presence of oxygen in acids, ; shows variable nature of affinities, . berzelius, johann j., ; determines weights of elementary atoms, ; his birth and education, ; works at stockholm, ; his slight appliances and large discoveries, ; he reviews dalton's atomic theory, ; his views superseded by avogadro's generalization, ; he accepts law of isomorphism, ; and davy's discovery of chlorine, ; his views on affinity of atoms, ; his dual classification, ; works at organic chemistry, ; his dualism attacked by dumas, . black, joseph, born at bordeaux, ; his education, ; his thesis on magnesia and discovery of "fixed air," , _et seq._; inquiries into latent heat, ; professor at edinburgh, ; his death and character, , _et seq._; _resumé_ of his work, ; his examination of alkalis, . boyle, hon. robert, ; his "sceptical chymist," ; law known as "boyle's law," ; opposes doctrine of elementary principles, ; his definition of an acid, ; extends the knowledge of salts, . bromine, discovered by balard, . c carbonic acid gas, or "fixed air," studied by black, ; by priestley, , . cavendish, hon. henry, rediscovers hydrogen, , ; and composition of water and air, . chloral, } produced by liebig, composition determined by dumas, . chloroform,} chlorine, discovered by davy, ; replaces hydrogen in organic compounds, . colloids, . combination in multiple proportions, . combustion, studied by early chemists, (_vide_ "phlogistic theory"); studied by black, ; his views of lavoisier's theory, ; priestley's views of combustion, ; lavoisier's experiments, , _et seq._; liebig's combustion-tube, . compound radicle, ; the idea of substitution, , . conservation of mass, doctrine of, . crystallization, water of, . crystalloids, . d dalton, john, his birth and education, ; "answers to correspondents," ; his meteorological observations, ; teaches at manchester, ; colour-blind, ; pressures of gaseous mixtures, ; strives after general laws, ; first view of atomic theory, ; visits paris, ; honours conferred on him, , ; dies, ; consideration of atomic theory (which see), , _et seq._; his "new system of chemical philosophy," ; fixes atomic weight of hydrogen, ; small use he makes of books, ; inaccurate as an experimenter, ; his method compared with priestley's, . davy, sir humphry, ; opposes the atomic theory, ; accepts same, ; studies the chemical aspects of electricity, ; experiments on the acid and alkali said to be produced by electrolyzing water, ; apparent suspension of chemical affinities by action of electricity, ; discovers potassium, ; and sodium, ; the metallic bases of earths, ; proves the elementary nature of chlorine, ; davy's birth and youth, ; experiments on heat, ; his work at bristol, ; inhales gases, ; lectures at the royal institution, ; discovers iodine and invents safety-lamp, ; dies, . dialysis, . diffusion-rates of gases, ; distinguished from transpiration-rates, ; diffusion-rates of liquids, . dulong, his law of atomic heat, . dumas, jean b. a., birth and education, ; physiological studies, ; meets von humboldt, ; attacks the dualism of berzelius, ; dumas's vapour density process, ; ethers and alcohols, ; chlorine in connection with organic compounds, ; determines composition of chloral and chloroform, ; studies fermentation, ; member of the national assembly, ; takes office, . e earths, ; stahl's views, ; the connection between earths and alkalis, ; their metallic bases, , . economy of waste materials, . electric affinity, , . electricity, volta's battery, ; used to decompose water, ; new metals discovered by its help, . elements: old doctrine of elementary principles opposed by boyle, ; modern definition of element, (_vide_ "spectroscopic analysis"--basic lines, ). equivalency, conception of, . f fermentation, studied by dumas, . fourcroy, calls lavoisier's views "la chimie française,", g gay-lussac, , , , , . gerhardt, , . graham, thomas, early life, ; made master of the mint, ; his death, ; studies alcoates, ; formulates conception of acids of different basicity, ; considers hydrogen a metal, ; investigates phenomena observed by döbereiner, ; diffusion-rates of gases, ; of liquids, ; his atmolyzer, ; his dialyzer, ; studies movements and reactions of molecules, . h hales's experiments on gases, . heat, black's study of latent heat, ; specific heat, ; dalton lectures on, ; law of capacity for heat, ; heat as produced by friction, . helmholtz, ; vortex atoms, . hooke, robert, his "micographia," ; studies combustion, . humboldt, alexander von, assists liebig, ; and dumas, . hydrochloric acid discovered by priestley, ; a stumbling-block to lavoisierian chemists, ; studied by davy, . hydrogen, rediscovered by cavendish, ; experimented on by priestley, ; its atomic weight decided by dalton, ; graham considers it a metal, . i iodine, discovered by davy, . isomerism, . isomorphism, law of, . l laplace, assists lavoisier, . latent heat, black's theory of, . laurent, his unitary theory, , . lavoisier, antoine l., born at paris, ; confutes idea of transmutation, ; paper on calcination of tin, ; meets priestley, , ; his theory of combustion, , ; his chemical nomenclature, ; he is guillotined, ; _resumé_ of his work, ; his views on salts, , . liebig, justus, birth, ; humboldt and gay-lussac, ; his improved combustion-tube, ; studies the cyanates, ; distinction between organic and inorganic chemistry effaced, ; produces chloroform and chloral, ; benzoyl, ; he leaves giessen for munich, ; his practical and economic discoveries, ; death, ; his failure to discover bromine, . lockyer, his work with spectroscope, (and _vide_ "spectroscopic analysis"). m mayow, john, studies combustion, . metals, new, discovered by berzelius, ; by davy, ; hydrogen a metal, . meyer, his views on acids, . mitscherlich's law of isomorphism, . molecule, conception of, ; molecular weight, ; molecular mobility of gases, ; movements and reactions of molecules, ; modern conception of, . morveau, de, embraces lavoisier's views, . muriatic acid (_vide_ "hydrochloric acid,") . n nitric acid, discovered by priestley, ; produced by electrolysis, . nomenclature, lavoisier's system of, . o oil, principle of, . organic chemistry, worked at by berzelius, ; attempts to define it, ; loose application of the term, ; wöhler's manufacture of urea abolishes distinction of organic and inorganic chemistry, . oxygen discovered by priestley, ; lavoisier's experiments, ; it is viewed by him as an acidifier, , ; berthollet shows it not a necessary constituent of acids, (_vide_ "acids"). p paracelsus, ; his pamphlet, "tripus aureus," etc., . petit, . phlogistic theory, ; enunciated by stahl, ; abandoned by black, ; phlogiston described as a kind of motion, ; discovery of dephlogisticated air, ; the theory overthrown by lavoisier, . phosphoric acid, . pneumatic trough, invented by priestley, . potassium, discovered by davy, . prussic acid, discovered by berthollet, . priestley, joseph, born, ; bred for the ministry, ; writes on electricity, ; his pneumatic trough, ; discovers oxygen, ; meets lavoisier, , ; goes to birmingham, ; his experiments on hydrogen, ; his house burnt by rioters, ; emigrates to america, ; dies there, ; _resumé_ of his work, ; his method compared with that of dalton, . q quantitative analysis neglected by early chemists, ; first accurately employed by black, ; used by lavoisier, . r respiration explained by lavoisier, . revolution, french, its effect on priestley, ; lavoisier guillotined, . richter's equivalents of acids and bases, . ripley, canon, an alchemist, his poems, . rouelle, invents term "base," ; his studies on salts, . s salts, ; "principle of salt" opposed by boyle, ; earth or alkali the _base_ of salts, ; rouelle's inquiries, ; lavoisier's definition, ; considered as metallic derivatives of acids, ; alcoholic salts, . "sceptical chymist, the," by hon. robert boyle, - . shelburne, earl of, patron of priestley, ; to whom he grants an annuity, . spectroscopic analysis, ; lines in solar spectrum, ; the solar atmosphere, ; lockyer's mapping of the lines, ; basic lines, ; objections to his hypothesis, . stahl, george ernest, born at anspach, ; enunciates the phlogistic theory, , ; his "primordial acid," ; his essential property of earths, . sulphur dioxide, discovered by priestley, . sulphur salts, discovered by berzelius, . t transmutation, confuted by lavoisier, . transpiration of gases, . types, . v valentine, basil, an alchemist, ; his views on alkalis, . van helmont, . vitriols, . volta's electric pile, . w water, its composition discovered by cavendish, - ; nearly discovered by priestley, ; confirmed by lavoisier, ; decomposed by electricity, . weight of ultimate particles, , ; molecular and atomic, ; revision of atomic weights, . wöhler, his account of visit to berzelius, , , ; studies cyanates with liebig, ; results of his discovery as to urea, . wollaston, supports atomic theory, . printed by william clowes and sons, limited, london and beccles. the principles of chemistry by d. mendelÉeff translated from the russian (sixth edition) by george kamensky, a.r.s.m. of the imperial mint, st petersburg: member of the russian physico-chemical society edited by t. a. lawson, b.sc. ph.d. examiner in coal-tar products to the city and guilds of london institute fellow of the institute of chemistry in two volumes volume ii. longmans, green, and co paternoster row, london new york and bombay all rights reserved * * * * * table iii. _the periodic dependence of the composition of the simplest compounds and properties of the simple bodies upon the atomic weights of the elements._ +-------------------------+--------------------------------+ | | | |molecular composition of | | |the higher hydrogen and | atomic weights of the elements | |metallo-organic compounds| | |-------------------------+--------------------------------+ | | | | | | |e=ch_{ }, c_{ }h_{ }, &c.| | | | | | | | |[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | [ ] [ ] | | | | | hh| h , (mean) | | | li · (stas) | | | be · (nilson pettersson)| | be_{ } -- --| b · (ramsay ashton) | | ch_{ } c_{ }h_{ } | | | c_{ }h_{ } c_{ }h_{ } | c · (roscoe) | | nh_{ } n_{ }h_{ } --| n · (stas) | | oh_{ } --| o (conventional) | | fh| f · (christiansen) | | | | | nae| na · (stas) | | mge_{ } --| mg · (burton) | | ale_{ } -- --| al · (mallet) | |sih_{ } si_{ }e_{ } -- --| si · (thorpe young) | | ph_{ } p_{ }h_{ } --| p · (v. d. plaats) | | sh_{ } --| s · (stas) | | clh| cl · (stas) | | | | | | k · (stas) | | | ca · (dumas) | | | sc · (nilson) | | | ti · (thorpe) | | | v · (roscoe) | | | cr · (rawson) | | | mn · (marignac) | | | fe · (dumas) | | | co · (zimmermann) | | | ni · (winkler) | | | cu . (richards) | | zne_{ } --| zn · (marignac) | | gae_{ } -- --| ga · (boisbaudran) | | gee_{ } -- -- --| ge · (winkler) | | ash_{ } -- --| as · (dumas) | | seh_{ } --| se · [a] (pettersson) | | brh| br · (stas) | | | | | | rb · (godeffroy) | | | sr · (dumas) | | | y (clève) | | | zr · (bailey) | | | nb (marignac) | | | mo · (maas) | | | unknown metal | | | | | | ru · (joly) | | | rh · (seubert) | | | pd · (keller smith) | | | ag · (stas) | | cde_{ } --| cd · (lorimer smith) | | ine_{ } -- --| in · (winkler) | | sne_{ } -- -- --| sn · (classen) | | sbh_{ } -- --| sb · (schneider) | | teh_{ } --| te · (brauner) | | | | | | cs · (godeffroy) | | | ba · (richards) | | | la · (brauner) | | | ce · (brauner) | | | | | | ta · (marignac) | | | w · (waddel) | | | unknown element. | | | | | | ir · (joly) | | | pt · (dittmar mcarthur) | | | au · (mallet) | | hge_{ } --| hg · (erdmann mar.) | | tle_{ } -- --| tl · (crookes) | | pbe_{ } -- -- --| pb · (stas) | | bie_{ } -- --| bi · (classen) | | | five unknown elements. | | | th · (krüss nilson) | | | unknown element. | | | u · (zimmermann) | +-------------------------+--------------------------------+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | | | | | composition of the saline compounds, x = cl | | | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | br, (no_{ }), / o, / (so_{ }), oh, (om) = z, where m = k, | | / ca, / al, &c. | |form rx rx_{ } rx_{ } rx_{ } rx_{ } rx_{ } rx_{ } rx_{ }| |oxi- r_{ }o ro r_{ }o_{ } ro_{ } r_{ }o_{ } ro_{ } r_{ }o_{ } ro_{ }| |des | | [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | | | | x or h_{ }o | | ix | | -- bex_{ } | | -- -- bx_{ } | | | | -- co -- coz_{ } | | n_{ }o no noz no_ no_{ }z | | -- ox_{ } | | fz | | | | nax | | -- mgx_{ } | | -- -- alx_{ } | | -- -- -- sioz_{ } | | -- -- px_{ } -- poz_{ } | | -- sx_{ } -- soz_{ } -- so_{ }z_{ } | | clz -- cloz -- clo_{ }z -- clo_{ }z | | | | kx | | -- cax_{ } | | -- -- scx_{ } | | -- tix_{ } tix_{ } tix_{ } | | -- vo vox -- voz_{ } | | -- crx_{ } crx_{ } cro_{ } -- cro_{ }z_{ } | | -- mnx_{ } mnx_{ } mno_{ } -- mno_{ }z_{ } mno_{ }z | | -- fex_{ } fex_{ } -- -- feo_{ }z_{ } | | -- cox_{ } cox_{ } coo_{ } | | -- nix_{ } nix_{ } | | cux cux_{ } | | -- znx_{ } | | -- -- gax_{ } | | -- gex_{ } -- gex_{ } | | -- ass asx_{ } ass_{ } aso_{ }z | | -- -- -- seoz_{ } -- seo_{ }z_{ } | | brz -- broz -- bro_{ }z -- bro_{ }z | | | | rbx | | -- srx_{ } | | -- -- yx_{ } | | -- -- -- zrx_{ } | | -- -- nbx_{ } -- nbo_{ }z | | -- -- mox_{ } mox_{ } -- moo_{ }z_{ } | |(eka-manganese, em = ). emo_{ }z | | ruo_{ }| | -- rux_{ } rux_{ } rux_{ } -- ruo_{ }z_{ } ruo_{ }z | | -- rhx_{ } rhx_{ } rhx_{ } -- rho_{ }z_{ } | | pdx pdx_{ } -- pdx_{ } | | agx | | -- cdx_{ } | | -- inx_{ } inx_{ } | | -- snx_{ } -- snx_{ } | | -- -- sbx_{ } -- sbo_{ }z | | -- -- -- teoz_{ } -- teo_{ }z_{ } | | iz -- iz_{ } -- io_{ }z -- io_{ }z | | | | csx | | -- bax_{ } | | -- -- lax_{ } | | -- -- cex_{ } cex_{ } | | little known di = . and yb = . , and over unknown elements.| | -- -- -- -- tao_{ }z | | -- -- -- wx_{ } -- wo_{ }z_{ } | | | | oso_{ }| | -- -- osx_{ } osx_{ } -- oso_{ }z_{ } -- | | -- -- irx_{ } irx_{ } -- iro_{ }z_{ } | | -- ptx_{ } -- ptx_{ } | | aux -- aux_{ } | | hgx hgx_{ } | | tlx -- tlx_{ } | | -- pbx_{ } -- pboz_{ } | | -- -- bix_{ } -- bio_{ }z | | | | -- -- -- thx_{ } | | | | -- -- -- uo_{ } -- uo_{ }x_{ } uo_{ }| +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +-------------------------+------------+---------+---------------------+ | | | lower | simple bodies | |molecular composition of | |hydrogen +-----+-------+-------| |the higher hydrogen and | peroxides | com- | sp. | sp. |melting| |metallo-organic compounds| | pounds | gr | vol. | point | |-------------------------+------------+---------+-----+-------+-------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |e=ch_{ }, c_{ }h_{ }, &c.| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |[ ] | [ ] | [ ] | | | | | | | | | hh|h_{ }o_{ } | -- |* · | | - °?| | | -- | -- | · | · | ° | | | -- | beh | · | · | °?| | be_{ } -- --| -- | -- | · | · | , °?| | ch_{ } c_{ }h_{ } | | | | | | | c_{ }h_{ } c_{ }h_{ } |c_{ }o_{ }* | -- |* · | · | , °?| | nh_{ } n_{ }h_{ } --|n_{ }o_{ }* | n_{ }h |* · | | - ° | | oh_{ } --|o_{ } | -- |* · | | - °?| | fh| -- | -- |? · | | ? | | | | | | | | | nae|nao | na_{ }h | · | · | ° | | mge_{ } --| -- | mgh | · | | ° | | ale_{ } -- --| -- | -- | · | | ° | |sih_{ } si_{ }e_{ } -- --| -- | -- | · | | , °?| | ph_{ } p_{ }h_{ } --| -- | p_ h | · | | ° | | sh_{ } --|s_{ }o_{ } | -- | · | | ° | | clh| -- | -- |* · | | - ° | | | | | | | | | |ko_{ } | k_{ }h | · | | ° | | |cao_{ } | cah | · | | ° | | | -- | -- |? · | ? | , °?| | |tio_{ } | -- | · | | , °?| | | -- | -- | · | | , °?| | |cr_{ }o_{ } | -- | · | · | , °?| | | -- | -- | · | · | , ° | | | -- |fe_{n}h* | · | · | , ° | | | -- | -- | · | · | , ° | | | -- | ni_{n}h | · | · | , ° | | |cu_{ }o_{ }*| cuh | · | · | , ° | | zne_{ } --|zno_{ } | -- | · | · | ° | | gae_{ } -- --| -- | -- | · | · | ° | | gee_{ } -- -- --| -- | -- | · | · | ° | | ash_{ } -- --| -- |as_{ }h* | · | · | ° | | seh_{ } --| -- | -- | · | | ° | | brh| -- | -- | · | | - ° | | | | | | | | | |rbo |rb_{ }h* | · | | ° | | |sro_{ } | srh | · | | °?| | | -- | -- |* · | * | , °?| | | -- |zr_{ n}h*| · | | , °?| | | -- |nb_{n}h* | · | | , °?| | |mo_{ }o_{ } | -- | · | | , °?| | | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | | | | | | | | | | -- |ru_{n}h* | · | · | , °?| | | -- |rh_{n}h* | · | · | , °?| | | -- | pd_{ }h | · | · | , ° | | |ago | -- | · | · | ° | | cde_{ } --|cdo_{ } | -- | · | | ° | | ine_{ } -- --| -- | -- | · | | ° | | sne_{ } -- -- --|sno_{ } | -- | · | | ° | | sbh_{ } -- --| -- | -- | · | | ° | | teh_{ } --| -- | -- | · | | ° | | ih| -- | -- | · | | ° | | | | | | | | | | -- |cs_{ }h* | · | | ° | | |bao_{ } | bah | · | | ? | | | -- | -- | · | | ? | | | -- | -- | · | | °?| | | | | | | | | | -- |ta_{n}h* | · | | ? | | |w_{ }o_{ } | -- | · | · | , ° | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | -- | -- | · | · | , °?| | | -- | ir_nh* | · | · | , ° | | | -- |pt_{n}h* | · | · | , ° | | | -- | -- | · | | , ° | | hge_{ } --| -- | -- | · | | - ° | | tle_{ } -- --| -- | -- | · | | ° | | pbe_{ } -- -- --| -- | -- | · | | ° | | bie_{ } -- --| -- | -- | · | | ° | | | | | | | | | | -- | -- | · | | ? | | | | | | | | | | -- | -- | · | | , °?| +-------------------------+------------+---------+-----+-------+-------+ [a] from analogy there is reason for thinking that the atomic weight of selenium is really slightly less than · . columns , , , and give the molecular composition of the hydrogen and metallo-organic compounds, exhibiting the most characteristic forms assumed by the elements. the first column contains only those which correspond to the form rx_{ }, the second column those of the form rx_{ }, the third of the form rx_{ }, and the fourth of the form rx, so that the periodicity stands out clearly (see column ). column contains the symbols of all the more or less well-known elements, placed according to the order of the magnitude of their atomic weights. column contains the atomic weights of the elements according to the most trustworthy determinations. the names of the investigators are given in parenthesis. the atomic weight of oxygen, taken as , forms the basis upon which these atomic weights were calculated. some of these have been recalculated by me on the basis of stas's most trustworthy data (_see_ chapter xxiv. and the numbers given by stas in the table, where they are taken according to van der plaats and thomsen's calculations). columns - contain the composition of the saline compounds of the elements, placed according to their forms, rx, rx_{ } to rx_{ } (in the ^{th} column). if the element r has a metallic character like h, li, be, &c., then x represents cl, no_{ }, / so_{ }, &c., haloid radicles, or (oh) if a perfect hydrate is formed (alkali, aqueous base), or / o, / s, &c. when an anhydrous oxide, sulphide, &c. is formed. for instance, nacl, mg(no_{ })_{ }, al_{ }(so_{ })_{ }, correspond to nax, mgx_{ }, and alx_{ }; so also na(oh), mg(oh)_{ }, al(oh)_{ }, na_{ }o, mgo, al_{ }o_{ }, &c. but if the element, like c or n, be of a metalloid or acid character, x must be regarded as (oh) in the formation of hydrates; (om) in the formation of salts, where m is the equivalent of a metal, / o in the formation of an anhydride, and cl in the formation of a chloranhydride; and in this case (_i.e._ in the acid compounds) z is put in the place of x; for example, the formulæ coz_{ }, no_{ }z, mno_{ }z, feo_{ }z_{ }, and iz_{ } correspond to co(nao)_{ } = na_{ }co_{ }, cocl_{ }, co_{ }, no_{ }(nao) = nano_{ }, no_{ }cl, no_{ }(oh) = hno_{ }; mno_{ }(ok) = kmno_{ }, icl, &c. the th column gives the compositions of the peroxides of the elements, _taking them as anhydrous_. an asterisk (*) is attached to those of which the composition has not been well established, and a dash (--) shows that for a given element no peroxides have yet been obtained. the peroxides contain more oxygen than the higher saline oxides of the same elements, are powerfully oxidising, and easily give peroxide of hydrogen. this latter circumstance necessitates their being referred to the type of peroxide of hydrogen, if bases and acids are referred to the type of water (see chapter xv., note and bis). the th column gives the composition of the lower hydrogen compounds like n_{ }h and na_{ }h. they may often be regarded as alloys of hydrogen, which is frequently disengaged by them at a comparatively moderate temperature. they differ greatly in their nature from the hydrogen compounds given in columns - (_see_ note ). column gives the specific gravity of the elements in a solid and a liquid state. an asterisk (*) is placed by those which can either only be assumed from analogy (for example, the sp. gr. of fluorine and hydrogen, which have not been obtained in a liquid state), or which vary very rapidly with a variation of temperature and pressure (like oxygen and nitrogen), or physical state (for instance, carbon in passing from the state of charcoal to graphite and diamond). but as the sp. gr. in general varies with the temperature, mechanical condition, &c., the figures given, although chosen from the most trustworthy sources, can only be regarded as approximate, and not as absolutely true. they clearly show a certain periodicity; for instance, the sp. gr. diminishes from al on both sides (al, mg, na, with decreasing atomic weight; and al, si, p, s, cl, with increasing atomic weight, it also diminishes on both sides from cu, ru, and os.) the same remarks refer to the figures in the th column, which gives the so-called atomic volumes of the simple bodies, or the quotient of their atomic weight and specific gravity. for na, k, rb, and cs the atomic volume is greatest among the neighbouring elements. for ni, pd, and os it is least, and this indicates the periodicity of this property of the simple bodies. the last ( th) column gives the melting points of the simple bodies. here also a periodicity is seen, i.e. a maximum and minimum value between which there are intermediate values, as we see, for instance, in the series cl, k, ca, sc, and ti, or in the series cr, mn, fe, co, ni, cu, zn, ga, and ge. * * * * * chapter xv the grouping of the elements and the periodic law it is seen from the examples given in the preceding chapters that the sum of the data concerning the chemical transformations proper to the elements (for instance, with respect to the formation of acids, salts, and other compounds having definite properties) is insufficient for accurately determining the relationship of the elements, inasmuch as this may be many-sided. thus, lithium and barium are in some respects analogous to sodium and potassium, and in others to magnesium and calcium. it is evident, therefore, that for a complete judgment it is necessary to have, not only qualitative, but also quantitative, exact and measurable, data. when a property can be measured it ceases to be vague, and becomes quantitative instead of merely qualitative. among these measurable properties of the elements, or of their corresponding compounds, are: (_a_) isomorphism, or the analogy of crystalline forms; and, connected with it, the power to form crystalline mixtures which are isomorphous; (_b_) the relation of the volumes of analogous compounds of the elements; (_c_) the composition of their saline compounds; and (_d_) the relation of the atomic weights of the elements. in this chapter we shall briefly consider these four aspects of the matter, which are exceedingly important for a natural and fruitful grouping of the elements, facilitating, not only a general acquaintance with them, but also their detailed study. historically the first, and an important and convincing, method for finding a relationship between the compounds of two different elements is by _isomorphism_. this conception was introduced into chemistry by mitscherlich (in ), who demonstrated that the corresponding salts of arsenic acid, h_{ }aso_{ }, and phosphoric acid, h_{ }po_{ }, crystallise with an equal quantity of water, show an exceedingly close resemblance in crystalline form (as regards the angles of their faces and axes), and are able to crystallise together from solutions, forming crystals containing a mixture of the isomorphous compounds. isomorphous substances are those which, with an equal number of atoms in their molecules, present an analogy in their chemical reactions, a close resemblance in their properties, and a similar or very nearly similar crystalline form: they often contain certain elements in common, from which it is to be concluded that the remaining elements (as in the preceding example of as and p) are analogous to each other. and inasmuch as crystalline forms are capable of exact measurement, the external form, or the relation of the molecules which causes their grouping into a crystalline form, is evidently as great a help in judging of the internal forces acting between the atoms as a comparison of reactions, vapour densities, and other like relations. we have already seen examples of this in the preceding pages.[ ] it will be sufficient to call to mind that the compounds of the alkali metals with the halogens rx, in a crystalline form, all belong to the cubic system and crystallise in octahedra or cubes--for example, sodium chloride, potassium chloride, potassium iodide, rubidium chloride, &c. the nitrates of rubidium and cæsium appear in anhydrous crystals of the same form as potassium nitrate. the carbonates of the metals of the alkaline earths are isomorphous with calcium carbonate--that is, they either appear in forms like calc spar or in the rhombic system in crystals analogous to aragonite.[ bis] furthermore, sodium nitrate crystallises in rhombohedra, closely resembling the rhombohedra of calc spar (calcium carbonate), caco_{ }, whilst potassium nitrate appears in the same form as aragonite, caco_{ }, and the number of atoms in both kinds of salts is the same: they all contain one atom of a metal (k, na, ca), one atom of a non-metal (c, n), and three atoms of oxygen. the analogy of form evidently coincides with an analogy of atomic composition. but, as we have learnt from the previous description of these salts, there is not any close resemblance in their properties. it is evident that calcium carbonate approaches more nearly to magnesium carbonate than to sodium nitrate, although their crystalline forms are all equally alike. isomorphous substances which are perfectly analogous to each other are not only characterised by a close resemblance of form (homeomorphism), but also by the faculty of entering into analogous reactions, which is not the case with rno_{ } and rco_{ }. the most important and direct method of recognising perfect isomorphism--that is, the absolute analogy of two compounds--is given by that property of analogous compounds of separating from solutions _in homogeneous crystals, containing the most varied proportions_ of the analogous substances which enter into their composition. these quantities do not seem to be in dependence on the molecular or atomic weights, and if they are governed by any laws they must be analogous to those which apply to indefinite chemical compounds.[ ] this will be clear from the following examples. potassium chloride and potassium nitrate are not isomorphous with each other, and are in an atomic sense composed in a different manner. if these salts be mixed in a solution and the solution be evaporated, independent crystals of the two salts will separate, each in that crystalline form which is proper to it. the crystals will not contain a mixture of the two salts. but if we mix the solutions of two isomorphous salts together, then, under certain circumstances, crystals will be obtained which contain both these substances. however, this cannot be taken as an absolute rule, for if we take a solution saturated at a high temperature with a mixture of potassium and sodium chlorides, then on evaporation sodium chloride only will separate, and on cooling only potassium chloride. the first will contain very little potassium chloride, and the latter very little sodium chloride.[ ] but if we take, for example, a mixture of solutions of magnesium sulphate and zinc sulphate, they cannot be separated from each other by evaporating the mixture, notwithstanding the rather considerable difference in the solubility of these salts. again, the isomorphous salts, magnesium carbonate, and calcium carbonate are found together--that is, in one crystal--in nature. the angle of the rhombohedron of these magnesia-lime spars is intermediate between the angles proper to the two spars individually (for calcium carbonate, the angle of the rhombohedron is ° ´; magnesium carbonate, ° ´; camg(co_{ })_{ }, ° ´). certain of these _isomorphous mixtures_ of calc and magnesia spars appear in well-formed crystals, and in this case there not unfrequently exists a simple molecular proportion of strictly definite chemical combination between the component salts--for instance, caco_{ },mgco_{ }--whilst in other cases, especially in the absence of distinct crystallisation (in dolomites), no such simple molecular proportion is observable: this is also the case in many artificially prepared isomorphous mixtures. the microscopical and crystallo-optical researches of professor inostrantzoff and others show that in many cases there is really a mechanical, although microscopically minute, juxtaposition in one whole of the heterogeneous crystals of calcium carbonate (double refracting) and of the compound camgc_{ }o_{ }. if we suppose the adjacent parts to be microscopically small (on the basis of the researches of mallard, weruboff, and others), we obtain an idea of isomorphous mixtures. a formula of the following kind is given to isomorphous mixtures: for instance, for spars, rco_{ }, where r = mg, ca, and where it may be fe,mn ..., &c. this means that the ca is partially replaced by mg or another metal. alums form a common example of the separation of isomorphous mixtures from solutions. they are double sulphates (or seleniates) of alumina (or oxides isomorphous with it) and the alkalis, which crystallise in well-formed crystals. if aluminium sulphate be mixed with potassium sulphate, an alum separates, having the composition kals_{ }o_{ }, h_{ }o. if sodium sulphate or ammonium sulphate, or rubidium (or thallium) sulphate be used, we obtain alums having the composition rals_{ }o_{ }, h_{ }o. not only do they all crystallise in the cubic system, but they also contain an equal atomic quantity of water of crystallisation ( h_{ }o). besides which, if we mix solutions of the potassium and ammonium (nh_{ }als_{ }o_{ }, h_{ }o) alums together, then the crystals which separate will contain various proportions of the alkalis taken, and separate crystals of the alums of one or the other kind will not be obtained, but each separate crystal will contain both potassium and ammonium. nor is this all; if we take a crystal of a potassium alum and immerse it in a solution capable of yielding ammonia alum, the crystal of the potash alum will continue to grow and increase in size in this solution--that is, a layer of the ammonia or other alum will deposit itself upon the planes bounding the crystal of the potash alum. this is very distinctly seen if a colourless crystal of a common alum be immersed in a saturated violet solution of chrome alum, kcrs_{ }o_{ }, h_{ }o, which then deposits itself in a violet layer over the colourless crystal of the alumina alum, as was observed even before mitscherlich noticed it. if this crystal be then immersed in a solution of an alumina alum, a layer of this salt will form over the layer of chrome alum, so that one alum is able to incite the growth of the other. if the deposition proceed simultaneously, the resultant intermixture may be minute and inseparable, but its nature is understood from the preceding experiments; the attractive force of crystallisation of isomorphous substances is so nearly equal that the attractive power of an isomorphous substance induces a crystalline superstructure exactly the same as would be produced by the attractive force of like crystalline particles. from this it is evident that one isomorphous substance may _induce the crystallisation_[ ] of another. such a phenomenon explains, on the one hand, the aggregation of different isomorphous substances in one crystal, whilst, on the other hand, it serves as a most exact indication of the nearness both of the molecular composition of isomorphous substances and of those forces which are proper to the elements which distinguish the isomorphous substances. thus, for example, ferrous sulphate or green vitriol crystallises in the monoclinic system and contains seven molecules of water, feso_{ }, h_{ }o, whilst copper vitriol crystallises with five molecules of water in the triclinic system, cuso_{ }, h_{ }o; nevertheless, it may be easily proved that both salts are perfectly isomorphous; that they are able to appear in identically the same forms and with an equal molecular amount of water. for instance, marignac, by evaporating a mixture of sulphuric acid and ferrous sulphate under the receiver of an air-pump, first obtained crystals of the hepta-hydrated salt, and then of the penta-hydrated salt feso_{ }, h_{ }o, which were perfectly similar to the crystals of copper sulphate. furthermore, lecoq de boisbaudran, by immersing crystals of feso_{ }, h_{ }o in a supersaturated solution of copper sulphate, caused the latter to deposit in the same form as ferrous sulphate, in crystals of the monoclinic system, cuso_{ }, h_{ }o. [ ] for instance the analogy of the sulphates of k, rb, and cs (chapter xiii., note ). [ bis] the crystalline forms of aragonite, strontianite, and witherite belong to the rhombic system; the angle of the prism of caco_{ } is ° ´, of srco_{ } ° ´, and of baco_{ } ° ´. on the other hand the crystalline forms of calc spar, magnesite, and calamine, which resemble each other quite as closely, belong to the rhombohedral system, with the angle of the rhombohedra for caco_{ } ° ´, mgco_{ } ° ´, and znco_{ } ° ´. from this comparison it is at once evident that zinc is more closely allied to magnesium than magnesium to calcium. [ ] solutions furnish the commonest examples of indefinite chemical compounds. but the isomorphous mixtures which are so common among the crystalline compounds of silica forming the crust of the earth, as well as alloys, which are so important in the application of metals to the arts, are also instances of indefinite compounds. and if in chapter i., and in many other portions of this work, it has been necessary to admit the presence of definite compounds (in a state of dissociation) in solutions, the same applies with even greater force to isomorphous mixtures and alloys. for this reason in many places in this work i refer to facts which compel us to recognise the existence of definite chemical compounds in all isomorphous mixtures and alloys. this view of mine (which dates from the sixties) upon isomorphous mixtures finds a particularly clear confirmation in b. roozeboom's researches ( ) upon the solubility and crystallising capacity of mixtures of the chlorates of potassium and thallium, kclo_{ } and tlclo_{ }. he showed that when a solution contains different amounts of these salts, it deposits crystals containing either an excess of the first salt, from p.c. to p.c., or an excess of the second salt, from · to p.c.; that is, in the crystalline form, either the first salt saturates the second or the second the first, just as in the solution of ether in water (chapter i.); moreover, the solubility of the mixtures containing · and p.c. kclo_{ } is similar, just as the vapour tension of a saturated solution of water in ether is equal to that of a saturated solution of ether in water (chapter i., note ). but just as there are solutions miscible in all proportions, so also certain isomorphous bodies can be present in crystals in all possible proportions of their component parts. van 't hoff calls such systems 'solid solutions.' these views were subsequently elaborated by nernst ( ), and witt ( ) applied them in explaining the phenomena observed in the coloration of tissues. [ ] the cause of the difference which is observed in different compounds of the same type, with respect to their property of forming isomorphous mixtures, must not be looked for in the difference of their volumetric composition, as many investigators, including kopp, affirm. the molecular volumes (found by dividing the molecular weight by the density) of those isomorphous substances which do give intermixtures are not nearer to each other than the volumes of those which do not give mixtures; for example, for magnesium carbonate the combining weight is , density · , and volume therefore ; for calcium carbonate in the form of calc spar the volume is , and in the form of aragonite ; for strontium carbonate , for barium carbonate ; that is, the volume of these closely allied isomorphous substances increases with the combining weight. the same is observed if we compare sodium chloride (molecular volume = ) with potassium chloride (volume = ), or sodium sulphate (volume = ) with potassium sulphate (volume = ), or sodium nitrate with potassium nitrate , although the latter are less capable of giving isomorphous mixtures than the former. it is evident that the cause of isomorphism cannot be explained by an approximation in molecular volumes. it is more likely that, given a similarity in form and composition, the faculty to give isomorphous mixtures is connected with the laws and degree of solubility. [ ] a phenomenon of a similar kind is shown for magnesium sulphate in note of the last chapter. in the same example we see what a complication the phenomena of dimorphism may introduce when the forms of analogous compounds are compared. hence it is evident that isomorphism--that is, the analogy of forms and the property of inducing crystallisation--may serve as a means for the discovery of analogies in molecular composition. we will take an example in order to render this clear. if, instead of aluminium sulphate, we add magnesium sulphate to potassium sulphate, then, on evaporating the solution, the double salt k_{ }mgs_{ }o_{ }, h_{ }o (chapter xiv., note ) separates instead of an alum, and the ratio of the component parts (in alums one atom of potassium per so_{ }, and here two atoms) and the amount of water of crystallisation (in alums , and here equivalents per so_{ }) are quite different; nor is this double salt in any way isomorphous with the alums, nor capable of forming an isomorphous crystalline mixture with them, nor does the one salt provoke the crystallisation of the other. from this we must conclude that although alumina and magnesia, or aluminium and magnesium, resemble each other, they are not isomorphous, and that although they give partially similar double salts, these salts are not analogous to each other. and this is expressed in their chemical formulæ by the fact that the number of atoms in alumina or aluminium oxide, al_{ }o_{ }, is different from the number in magnesia, mgo. aluminium is trivalent and magnesium bivalent. thus, having obtained a double salt from a given metal, it is possible to judge of the analogy of the given metal with aluminium or with magnesium, or of the absence of such an analogy, from the composition and form of this salt. thus zinc, for example, does not form alums, but forms a double salt with potassium sulphate, which has a composition exactly like that of the corresponding salt of magnesium. it is often possible to distinguish the bivalent metals analogous to magnesium or calcium from the trivalent metals, like aluminium, by such a method. furthermore, the specific heat and vapour density serve as guides. there are also indirect proofs. thus iron gives ferrous compounds, fex_{ }, which are isomorphous with the compounds of magnesium, and ferric compounds, fex_{ }, which are isomorphous with the compounds of aluminium; in this instance the relative composition is directly determined by analysis, because, for a given amount of iron, fecl_{ } only contains two-thirds of the amount of chlorine which occurs in fecl_{ }, and the composition of the corresponding oxygen compounds, _i.e._ of ferrous oxide, feo, and ferric oxide, fe_{ }o_{ }, clearly indicates the analogy of the ferrous oxide with mgo and of the ferric oxide with al_{ }o_{ }. thus in the building up of similar molecules in crystalline forms we see one of the numerous means for judging of the internal world of molecules and atoms, and one of the weapons for conquests in the invisible world of molecular mechanics which forms the main object of physico-chemical knowledge. this method[ ] has more than once been employed for discovering the analogy of elements and of their compounds; and as crystals are measurable, and the capacity to form crystalline mixtures can be experimentally verified, this method is a numerical and measurable one, and in no sense arbitrary. [ ] the property of solids of occurring in regular crystalline forms--the occurrence of many substances in the earth's crust in these forms--and those geometrical and simple laws which govern the formation of crystals long ago attracted the attention of the naturalist to crystals. the crystalline form is, without doubt, the expression of the relation in which the atoms occur in the molecules, and in which the molecules occur in the mass, of a substance. crystallisation is determined by the distribution of the molecules along the direction of greatest cohesion, and therefore those forces must take part in the crystalline distribution of matter which act between the molecules; and, as they depend on the forces binding the atoms together in the molecules, a very close connection must exist between the atomic composition and the distribution of the atoms in the molecule on the one hand, and the crystalline form of a substance on the other hand; and hence an insight into the composition may be arrived at from the crystalline form. such is the elementary and _a priori_ idea which lies at the base of all researches into _the connection between composition and crystalline form_. haüy in established the following fundamental law, which has been worked out by later investigators: that the fundamental crystalline form for a given chemical compound is constant (only the combinations vary), and that with a change of composition the crystalline form also changes, naturally with the exception of such limiting forms as the cube, regular octahedron, &c., which may belong to various substances of the regular system. the fundamental form is determined by the angles of certain fundamental geometric forms (prisms, pyramids, rhombohedra), or the ratio of the crystalline axes, and is connected with the optical and many other properties of crystals. since the establishment of this law the description of definite compounds in a solid state is accompanied by a description (measurement) of its crystals, which forms an invariable, definite, and measurable character. the most important epochs in the further history of this question were made by the following discoveries:--klaproth, vauquelin, and others showed that aragonite has the same composition as calc spar, whilst the former belongs to the rhombic and the latter to the hexagonal system. haüy at first considered that the composition, and after that the arrangement, of the atoms in the molecules was different. this is dimorphism (_see_ chapter xiv., note ). beudant, frankenheim, laurent, and others found that the forms of the two nitres, kno_{ } and nano_{ }, exactly correspond with the forms of aragonite and calc spar; that they are able, moreover, to pass from one form into another; and that the difference of the forms is accompanied by a small alteration of the angles, for the angle of the prisms of potassium nitrate and aragonite is °, and of sodium nitrate and calc spar, °; and therefore dimorphism, or the crystallisation of one substance in different forms, does not necessarily imply a great difference in the distribution of the molecules, although some difference clearly exists. the researches of mitscherlich ( ) on the dimorphism of sulphur confirmed this conclusion, although it cannot yet be affirmed that in dimorphism the arrangement of the atoms remains unaltered, and that only the molecules are distributed differently. leblanc, berthier, wollaston, and others already knew that many substances of different composition appear in the same forms, and crystallise together in one crystal. gay-lussac ( ) showed that crystals of potash alum continue to grow in a solution of ammonia alum. beudant ( ) explained this phenomenon as the _assimilation_ of a foreign substance by a substance having a great force of crystallisation, which he illustrated by many natural and artificial examples. but mitscherlich, and afterwards berzelius and henry rose and others, showed that such an assimilation only exists with a similarity or approximate similarity of the forms of the individual substances and with a certain degree of chemical analogy. thus was established the idea of _isomorphism_ as an analogy of forms by reason of a resemblance of atomic composition, and by it was explained the variability of the composition of a number of minerals as isomorphous mixtures. thus all the garnets are expressed by the general formula: (ro)_{ }m_{ }o_{ }(sio_{ })_{ }, where r = ca, mg, fe, mn, and m = fe, al, and where we may have either r and m separately, or their equivalent compounds, or their mixtures in all possible proportions. but other facts, which render the correlation of form and composition still more complex, have accumulated side by side with a mass of data which may be accounted for by admitting the conceptions of isomorphism and dimorphism. foremost among the former stand the phenomena of _homeomorphism_--that is, a nearness of forms with a difference of composition--and then the cases of polymorphism and hemimorphism--that is, a nearness of the fundamental forms or only of certain angles for substances which are near or analogous in their composition. instances of homeomorphism are very numerous. many of these, however, may be reduced to a resemblance of atomic composition, although they do not correspond to an isomorphism of the component elements; for example, cds (greenockite) and agi, caco_{ } (aragonite) and kno_{ }, caco_{ } (calc spar) and nano_{ }, baso_{ } (heavy spar), kmno_{ } (potassium permanganate), and kclo_{ } (potassium perchlorate), al_{ }o_{ } (corundum) and fetio_{ } (titanic iron ore), fes_{ } (marcasite, rhombic system) and fesas (arsenical pyrites), nis and nias, &c. but besides these instances there are homeomorphous substances with an absolute dissimilarity of composition. many such instances were pointed out by dana. cinnabar, hgs, and susannite, pbso_{ } pbco_{ } appear in very analogous crystalline forms; the acid potassium sulphate crystallises in the monoclinic system in crystals analogous to felspar, kalsi_{ }o_{ }; glauberite, na_{ }ca(so_{ })_{ }, augite, rsio_{ } (r = ca, mg), sodium carbonate, na_{ }co_{ }, h_{ }o, glauber's salt, na_{ }so_{ }, h_{ }o, and borax, na_{ }bro_{ }, h_{ }o, not only belong to the same system (monoclinic), but exhibit an analogy of combinations and a nearness of corresponding angles. these and many other similar cases might appear to be perfectly arbitrary (especially as a _nearness_ of angles and fundamental forms is a relative idea) were there not other cases where a resemblance of properties and a distinct relation in the variation of composition is connected with a resemblance of form. thus, for example, alumina, al_{ }o_{ }, and water, h_{ }o, are frequently found in many pyroxenes and amphiboles which only contain silica and magnesia (mgo, cao, feo, mno). scheerer and hermann, and many others, endeavoured to explain such instances by _polymetric isomorphism_, stating that mgo may be replaced by h_{ }o (for example, olivine and serpentine), sio_{ } by al_{ }o_{ } (in the amphiboles, talcs), and so on. a certain number of the instances of this order are subject to doubt, because many of the natural minerals which served as the basis for the establishment of polymeric isomorphism in all probability no longer present their original composition, but one which has been altered under the influence of solutions which have come into contact with them; they therefore belong to the class of _pseudomorphs_, or false crystals. there is, however, no doubt of the existence of a whole series of natural and artificial homeomorphs, which differ from each other by atomic amounts of water, silica, and some other component parts. thus, thomsen ( ) showed a very striking instance. the metallic chlorides, rcl_{ }, often crystallise with water, and they do not then contain less than one molecule of water per atom of chlorine. the most familiar representative of the order rcl_{ }, h_{ }o is bacl_{ }, h_{ }o, which crystallises in the rhombic system. barium bromide, babr_{ }, h_{ }o, and copper chloride, cucl_{ }, h_{ }o, have nearly the same forms: potassium iodate, kio_{ }; potassium chlorate, kclo_{ }; potassium permanganate, kmno_{ }; barium sulphate, baso_{ }; calcium sulphate, caso_{ }; sodium sulphate, na_{ }so_{ }; barium formate, bac_{ }h_{ }o_{ }, and others have almost the same crystalline form (of the rhombic system). parallel with this series is that of the metallic chlorides containing rcl_{ }, h_{ }o, of the sulphates of the composition rso_{ }, h_{ }o, and the formates rc_{ }h_{ }o_{ }, h_{ }o. these compounds belong to the monoclinic system, have a close resemblance of form, and differ from the first series by containing two more molecules of water. the addition of two more molecules of water in all the above series also gives forms of the monoclinic system closely resembling each other; for example, nicl_{ }, h_{ }o and mnso_{ }, h_{ }o. hence we see that not only is rcl_{ }, h_{ }o analogous in form to rso_{ } and rc_{ }h_{ }o_{ }, but that their compounds with h_{ }o and with h_{ }o also exhibit closely analogous forms. from these examples it is evident that the conditions which determine a given form may be repeated not only in the presence of an isomorphous exchange--that is, with an equal number of atoms in the molecule--but also in the presence of an unequal number when there are peculiar and as yet ungeneralised relations in composition. thus zno and al_{ }o_{ } exhibit a close analogy of form. both oxides belong to the rhombohedral system, and the angle between the pyramid and the terminal plane of the first is ° ´, and of the second ° ´. alumina, al_{ }o_{ }, is also analogous in form to sio_{ }, and we shall see that these analogies of form are conjoined with a certain analogy in properties. it is not surprising, therefore, that in the complex molecule of a siliceous compound it is sometimes possible to replace sio_{ } by means of al_{ }o_{ }, as scheerer admits. the oxides cu_{ }o, mgo, nio, fe_{ }o_{ }, ceo_{ }, crystallise in the regular system, although they are of very different atomic structure. marignac demonstrated the perfect analogy of the forms of k_{ }zrf_{ } and caco_{ }, and the former is even dimorphous, like the calcium carbonate. the same salt is isomorphous with r_{ }nbof_{ } and r_{ }wo_{ }f_{ }, where r is an alkali metal. there is an equivalency between caco_{ } and k_{ }zrf_{ }, because k_{ } is equivalent to ca, c to zr, and f_{ } to o_{ }, and with the isomorphism of the other two salts we find besides an equal contents of the alkali metal--an equal number of atoms on the one hand and an analogy to the properties of k_{ }zrf_{ } on the other. the long-known isomorphism of the corresponding compounds of potassium and ammonium, kx and nh_{ }x, may be taken as the simplest example of the fact that an analogy of form shows itself with an analogy of chemical reaction even without an equality in atomic composition. therefore the ultimate progress of the entire doctrine of the correlation of composition and crystalline forms will only be arrived at with the accumulation of a sufficient number of facts collected on a plan corresponding with the problems which here present themselves. the first steps have already been made. the researches of the geneva _savant_, marignac, on the crystalline form and composition of many of the double fluorides, and the work of wyruboff on the ferricyanides and other compounds, are particularly important in this respect. it is already evident that, with a definite change of composition, certain angles remain constant, notwithstanding that others are subject to alteration. such an instance of the relation of forms was observed by laurent, and named by him _hemimorphism_ (an anomalous term) when the analogy is limited to certain angles, and _paramorphism_ when the forms in general approach each other, but belong to different systems. so, for example, the angle of the planes of a rhombohedron may be greater or less than °, and therefore such acute and obtuse rhombohedra may closely approximate to the cube. hausmannite, mn_{ }o_{ }, belongs to the tetragonal system, and the planes of its pyramid are inclined at an angle of about °, whilst magnetic iron ore, fe_{ }o_{ }, which resembles hausmannite in many respects, appears in regular octahedra--that is, the pyramidal planes are inclined at an angle of ° ´. this is an example of paramorphism; the systems are different, the compositions are analogous, and there is a certain resemblance in form. hemimorphism has been found in many instances of saline and other substitutions. thus, laurent demonstrated, and hintze confirmed ( ), that naphthalene derivatives of analogous composition are hemimorphous. nicklès ( ) showed that in ethylene sulphate the angle of the prism is ° ´, and in the nitrate of the same radicle ° ´. the angle of the prism of methylamine oxalate is ° ´, and of fluoride, which is very different in composition from the former, the angle is °. groth ( ) endeavoured to indicate in general what kinds of change of form proceed with the substitution of hydrogen by various other elements and groups, and he observed a regularity which he termed _morphotropy_. the following examples show that morphotropy recalls the hemimorphism of laurent. benzene, c_{ }h_{ }, rhombic system, ratio of the axes · : : · . phenol, c_{ }h_{ }(oh), and resorcinol, c_{ }h_{ }(oh)_{ }, also rhombic system, but the ratio of one axis is changed--thus, in resorcinol, · : : · ; that is, a portion of the crystalline structure in one direction is the same, but in the other direction it is changed, whilst in the rhombic system dinitrophenol, c_{ }h_{ }(no_{ })_{ }(oh) = o· : : · ; trinitrophenol (picric acid), c_{ }h_{ }(no)_{ }(oh) = · : : · ; and the potassium salt = · : : · . here the ratio of the first axis is preserved--that is, certain angles remain constant, and the chemical proximity of the composition of these bodies is undoubted. laurent compares hemimorphism with architectural style. thus, gothic cathedrals differ in many respects, but there is an analogy expressed both in the sum total of their common relations and in certain details--for example, in the windows. it is evident that we may expect many fruitful results for molecular mechanics (which forms a problem common to many provinces of natural science) from the further elaboration of the data concerning those variations which take place in crystalline form when the composition of a substance is subjected to a known change, and therefore i consider it useful to point out to the student of science seeking for matter for independent scientific research this vast field for work which is presented by the correlation of form and composition. the geometrical regularity and varied beauty of crystalline forms offer no small attraction to research of this kind. the regularity and simplicity expressed by the exact laws of crystalline form repeat themselves in the aggregation of the atoms to form molecules. here, as there, there are but few forms which are essentially different, and their apparent diversity reduces itself to a few fundamental differences of type. there the molecules aggregate themselves into crystalline forms; here, the atoms aggregate themselves into molecular forms or into _the types of compounds_. in both cases the fundamental crystalline or molecular forms are liable to variations, conjunctions, and combinations. if we know that potassium gives compounds of the fundamental type kx, where x is a univalent element (which combines with one atom of hydrogen, and is, according to the law of substitution, able to replace it), then we know the composition of its compounds: k_{ }o, kho, kcl, nh_{ }k, kno_{ }, k_{ }so_{ }, khso_{ }, k_{ }mg(so_{ })_{ }, h_{ }o, &c. all the possible derivative crystalline forms are not known. so also all the atomic combinations are not known for every element. thus in the case of potassium, kch_{ }, k_{ }p, k_{ }pt, and other like compounds which exist for hydrogen or chlorine, are unknown. only a few fundamental types exist for the building up of atoms into molecules, and the majority of them are already known to us. if x stand for a univalent element, and r for an element combined with it, then eight atomic types may be observed:-- rx, rx_{ }, rx_{ }, rx_{ }, rx_{ }, rx_{ }, rx_{ }, rx_{ }. let x be chlorine or hydrogen. then as examples of the first type we have: h_{ }, cl_{ }, hcl, kcl, nacl, &c. the compounds of oxygen or calcium may serve as examples of the type rx_{ }: oh_{ }, ocl_{ }, ohcl, cao, ca(oh)_{ }, cacl_{ }, &c. for the third type rx_{ } we know the representative nh_{ } and the corresponding compounds n_{ }o_{ }, no(oh), no(ok), pcl_{ }, p_{ }o_{ }, ph_{ }, sbh_{ }, sb_{ }o_{ }, b_{ }o_{ }, bcl_{ }, al_{ }o_{ }, &c. the type rx_{ } is known among the hydrogen compounds. marsh gas, ch_{ }, and its corresponding saturated hydrocarbons, c_{_n_}h_{ _n_ + }, are the best representatives. also ch_{ }cl, ccl_{ }, sicl_{ }, sncl_{ }, sno_{ }, co_{ }, sio_{ }, and a whole series of other compounds come under this class. the type rx_{ } is also already familiar to us, but there are no purely hydrogen compounds among its representatives. sal-ammoniac, nh_{ }cl, and the corresponding nh_{ }(oh), no_{ }(oh), clo_{ }(ok), as well as pcl_{ }, pocl_{ }, &c., are representatives of this type. in the higher types also there are no hydrogen compounds, but in the type rx_{ } there is the chlorine compound wcl_{ }. however, there are many oxygen compounds, and among them so_{ } is the best known representative. to this class also belong so_{ }(oh)_{ }, so_{ }cl_{ }, so_{ }(oh)cl, cro_{ }, &c., all of an acid character. of the higher types there are in general only oxygen and acid representatives. the type rx_{ } we know in perchloric acid, clo_{ }(oh), and potassium permanganate, mno_{ }(ok), is also a member. the type rx_{ } in a free state is very rare; osmic anhydride, oso_{ }, is the best known representative of it.[ ] [ ] the still more complex combinations--which are so clearly expressed in the crystallo-hydrates, double salts, and similar compounds--although they may be regarded as independent, are, however, most easily understood with our present knowledge as aggregations of whole molecules to which there are no corresponding double compounds, containing one atom of an element r and many atoms of other elements rx_{_n_}. the above types embrace all cases of direct combinations of atoms, and the formula mgso_{ }, h_{ }o cannot, without violating known facts, be directly deduced from the types mgx_{_n_} or sx_{_n_}, whilst the formula mgso_{ } corresponds both with the type of the magnesium compounds mgx_{ } and with the type of the sulphur compounds so_{ }x_{ }, or in general sx_{ }, where x_{ } is replaced by (oh)_{ }, with the substitution in this case of h_{ } by the atom mg, which always replaces h_{ }. however, it must be remarked that the sodium crystallo-hydrates often contain h_{ }o, the magnesium crystallo-hydrates and h_{ }o, and that the type ptm_{ }x_{ } is proper to the double salts of platinum, &c. with the further development of our knowledge concerning crystallo-hydrates, double salts, alloys, solutions, &c., in the _chemical sense_ of feeble compounds (that is, such as are easily destroyed by feeble chemical influences) it will probably be possible to arrive at a perfect generalisation for them. for a long time these subjects were only studied by the way or by chance; our knowledge of them is accidental and destitute of system, and therefore it is impossible to expect as yet any generalisation as to their nature. the days of gerhardt are not long past when only three types were recognised: rx, rx_{ }, and rx_{ }; the type rx_{ } was afterwards added (by cooper, kekulé, butleroff, and others), mainly for the purpose of generalising the data respecting the carbon compounds. and indeed many are still satisfied with these types, and derive the higher types from them; for instance, rx_{ } from rx_{ }--as, for example, pocl_{ } from pcl_{ }, considering the oxygen to be bound both to the chlorine (as in hclo) and to the phosphorus. but the time has now arrived when it is clearly seen that the forms rx, rx_{ }, rx_{ }, and rx_{ } do not exhaust the whole variety of phenomena. the revolution became evident when würtz showed that pcl_{ } is not a compound of pcl_{ } + cl_{ } (although it may decompose into them), but a whole molecule capable of passing into vapour, pcl_{ } like pf_{ } and sif_{ }. the time for the recognition of types even higher than rx_{ } is in my opinion in the future; that it will come, we can already see in the fact that oxalic acid, c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }, gives a crystallo-hydrate with h_{ }o; but it may be referred to the type ch_{ }, or rather to the type of ethane, c_{ }h_{ }, in which all the atoms of hydrogen are replaced by hydroxyl, c_{ }h_{ }o_{ } h_{ }o = c_{ }(oh)_{ } (_see_ chapter xxii., note ). the four lower types rx, rx_{ }, rx_{ }, and rx_{ } are met with in compounds of the elements r with chlorine and oxygen, and also in their compounds with hydrogen, whilst the four higher types only appear for such acid compounds as are formed by chlorine, oxygen, and similar elements. among the oxygen compounds the _saline oxides_ which are capable of forming salts either through the function of a base or through the function of an acid anhydride attract the greatest interest in every respect. certain elements, like calcium and magnesium, only give one saline oxide--for example, mgo, corresponding with the type mgx_{ }. but the majority of the elements appear in several such forms. thus copper gives cux and cux_{ }, or cu_{ }o and cuo. if an element r gives a higher type rx_{_n_}, then there often also exist, as if by symmetry, lower types, rx_{_n_- }, rx_{_n_- }, and in general such types as differ from rx_{_n_} by an even number of x. thus in the case of sulphur the types sx_{ }, sx_{ }, and sx_{ } are known--for example sh_{ }, so_{ }, and so_{ }. the last type is the highest, sx_{ }. the types sx_{ } and sx_{ } do not exist. but even and uneven types sometimes appear for one and the same element. thus the types rx and rx_{ } are known for copper and mercury. among the _saline_ oxides only the _eight types_ enumerated below are known to exist. they determine the possible formulæ of the compounds of the elements, if it be taken into consideration that an element which gives a certain type of combination may also give lower types. for this reason the rare type of the _suboxides_ or quaternary oxides r_{ }o (for instance, ag_{ }o, ag_{ }cl) is not characteristic; it is always accompanied by one of the higher grades of oxidation, and the compounds of this type are distinguished by their great chemical instability, and split up into an element and the higher compound (for instance, ag_{ }o = ag + ag_{ }o). many elements, moreover, form transition oxides whose composition is intermediate, which are able, like n_{ }o_{ }, to split up into the lower and higher oxides. thus iron gives magnetic oxide, fe_{ }o_{ }, which is in all respects (by its reactions) a compound of the suboxide feo with the oxide fe_{ }o_{ }. the independent and more or less stable saline compounds correspond with the following eight types:-- r_{ }o; salts rx, hydroxides roh. generally basic like k_{ }o, na_{ }o, hg_{ }o, ag_{ }o, cu_{ }o; if there are acid oxides of this composition they are very rare, are only formed by distinctly acid elements, and even then have only feeble acid properties; for example, cl_{ }o and n_{ }o. r_{ }o_{ } or ro; salts rx_{ }, hydroxides r(oh)_{ }. the most simple basic salts r_{ }ox_{ } or r(oh)x; for instance, the chloride zn_{ }ocl_{ }; also an almost exclusively basic type; but the basic properties are more feebly developed than in the preceding type. for example, cao, mgo, bao, pbo, feo, mno, &c. r_{ }o_{ }; salts rx_{ }, hydroxides r(oh)_{ }, ro(oh), the most simple basic salts rox, r(oh)x_{ }. the bases are feeble, like al_{ }o_{ }, fe_{ }o_{ }, tl_{ }o_{ }, sb_{ }o_{ }. the acid properties are also feebly developed; for instance, in b_{ }o_{ }; but with the non-metals the properties of acids are already clear; for instance, p_{ }o_{ }, p(oh)_{ }. r_{ }o_{ } or ro_{ }; salts rx_{ } or rox_{ }, hydroxides r(oh)_{ }, ro(oh)_{ }. rarely bases (feeble), like zro_{ }, pto_{ }; more often acid oxides; but the acid properties are in general feeble, as in co_{ }, so_{ }, sno_{ }. many intermediate oxides appear in this and the preceding and following types. r_{ }o_{ }; salts principally of the types rox_{ }, ro_{ }x, ro(oh)_{ }, ro_{ }(oh), rarely rx_{ }. the basic character (x, a halogen, simple or complex; for instance, no_{ }, cl, &c.) is feeble; the acid character predominates, as is seen in n_{ }o_{ }, p_{ }o_{ }, cl_{ }o_{ }; then x = oh, ok, &c., for example no_{ }(ok). r_{ }o_{ } or ro_{ }; salts and hydroxides generally of the type ro_{ }x_{ }, ro_{ }(oh)_{ }. oxides of an acid character, as so_{ }, cro_{ }, mno_{ }. basic properties rare and feebly developed as in uo_{ }. r_{ }o_{ }; salts of the form ro_{ }x, ro_{ }(oh), acid oxides; for instance, cl_{ }o_{ }, mn_{ }o_{ }. basic properties as feebly developed as the acid properties in the oxides r_{ }o. r_{ }o_{ } or ro_{ }. a very rare type, and only known in oso_{ } and ruo_{ }. it is evident from the circumstance that in all the higher types the _acid hydroxides_ (for example, hclo_{ }, h_{ }so_{ }, h_{ }po_{ }) and salts with a single atom of one element contain, like the higher saline type ro_{ }, _not more than four atoms of oxygen_; that the formation of the saline oxides is governed by a certain common principle which is best looked for in the fundamental properties of oxygen, and in general of the most simple compounds. the hydrate of the oxide ro_{ } is of the higher type ro_{ } h_{ }o = rh_{ }o_{ } = r(ho)_{ }. such, for example, is the hydrate of silica and the salts (orthosilicates) corresponding with it, si(mo)_{ }. the oxide r_{ }o_{ }, corresponds with the hydrate r_{ }o_{ } h_{ }o = rh_{ }o_{ } = ro(oh)_{ }. such is orthophosphoric acid, ph_{ }o_{ }. the hydrate of the oxide ro_{ } is ro_{ }h_{ }o = rh_{ }o_{ } = ro_{ }(oh)_{ }--for instance, sulphuric acid. the hydrate corresponding to r_{ }o_{ } is evidently rho = ro_{ }(oh)--for example, perchloric acid. here, besides containing o_{ }, it must further be remarked that _the amount of hydrogen in the hydrate is equal to the amount of hydrogen in the hydrogen compound_. thus silicon gives sih_{ } and sih_{ }o_{ }, phosphorus ph_{ } and ph_{ }o_{ }, sulphur sh_{ } and sh_{ }o_{ }, chlorine clh and clho_{ }. this, if it does not explain, at least connects in a harmonious and general system the fact that _the elements are capable of combining with a greater amount of oxygen, the less the amount of hydrogen which they are able to retain_. in this the key to the comprehension of all further deductions must be looked for, and we will therefore formulate this rule in general terms. an element r gives a hydrogen compound rh_{_n_}, the hydrate of its higher oxide will be rh_{_n_}o_{ }, and therefore the higher oxide will contain rh_{_n_}o_{ } - _n_h_{ }o = r_{ }o_{ - _n_}. for example, chlorine gives clh, hydrate clho_{ }, and the higher oxide cl_{ }o_{ }. carbon gives ch_{ } and co_{ }. so also, sio_{ } and sih_{ } are the higher compounds of silicon with hydrogen and oxygen, like co_{ } and ch_{ }. here the amounts of oxygen and hydrogen are equivalent. nitrogen combines with a large amount of oxygen, forming n_{ }o_{ }, but, on the other hand, with a small quantity of hydrogen in nh_{ }. _the sum of the equivalents of hydrogen and oxygen_, occurring in combination with an atom of nitrogen, is, as always in the higher types, equal to _eight_. it is the same with the other elements which combine with hydrogen and oxygen. thus sulphur gives so_{ }; consequently, six equivalents of oxygen fall to an atom of sulphur, and in sh_{ } two equivalents of hydrogen. the sum is again equal to eight. the relation between cl_{ }o_{ } and clh is the same. this shows that the property of elements of combining with such different elements as oxygen and hydrogen is subject to one common law, which is also formulated in the system of the elements presently to be described.[ ] [ ] the hydrogen compounds, r_{ }h, in equivalency correspond with the type of the suboxides, r_{ }o. palladium, sodium, and potassium give such hydrogen compounds, and it is worthy of remark that according to the periodic system these elements stand near to each other, and that in those groups where the hydrogen compounds r_{ }h appear, the quaternary oxides r_{ }o are also present. not wishing to complicate the explanation, i here only touch on the general features of the relation between the hydrates and oxides and of the oxides among themselves. thus, for instance, the conception of the ortho-acids and of the normal acids will be considered in speaking of phosphoric and phosphorous acids. as in the further explanation of the periodic law only those oxides which give salts will be considered, i think it will not be superfluous to mention here the following facts relative to the peroxides. of the _peroxides_ corresponding with hydrogen peroxide, the following are at present known: h_{ }o_{ }, na_{ }o_{ }, s_{ }o_{ } (as hso_{ }?), k_{ }o_{ }, k_{ }o_{ }, cao_{ }, tio_{ }, cr_{ }o_{ }, cuo_{ }(?), zno_{ }, rb_{ }o_{ }, sro_{ }, ag_{ }o_{ }, cdo_{ }, cso_{ }, cs_{ }o_{ }, bao_{ }, mo_{ }o_{ }, sno_{ }, w_{ }o_{ }, uo_{ }. it is probable that the number of peroxides will increase with further investigation. a periodicity is seen in those now known, for the elements (excepting li) of the first group, which give r_{ }o, form peroxides, and then the elements of the sixth group seem also to be particularly inclined to form peroxides, r_{ }o_{ }; but at present it is too early, in my opinion, to enter upon a generalisation of this subject, not only because it is a new and but little studied matter (not investigated for all the elements), but also, and more especially, because in many instances only the hydrates are known--for instance, mo_{ }h_{ }o_{ }--and they perhaps are only compounds of peroxide of hydrogen--for example, mo_{ }h_{ }o_{ } = moo_{ } + h_{ }o_{ }--since prof. schöne has shown that h_{ }o_{ } and bao_{ } possess the property of combining together and with other oxides. nevertheless, i have, in the general table expressing the periodic properties of the elements, endeavoured to sum up the data respecting all the known peroxide compounds whose characteristic property is seen in their capability to form peroxide of hydrogen under many circumstances. in the preceding we see not only the regularity and simplicity which govern the formation and properties of the oxides and of all the compounds of the elements, but also a fresh and exact means for recognising the analogy of elements. analogous elements give compounds of analogous types, both higher and lower. if co_{ } and so_{ } are two gases which closely resemble each other both in their physical and chemical properties, the reason of this must be looked for not in an analogy of sulphur and carbon, but in that identity of the type of combination, rx_{ }, which both oxides assume, and in that influence which a large mass of oxygen always exerts on the properties of its compounds. in fact, there is little resemblance between carbon and sulphur, as is seen not only from the fact that co_{ } is the _higher form_ of oxidation, whilst so_{ } is able to further oxidise into so_{ }, but also from the fact that all the other compounds--for example, sh_{ } and ch_{ }, scl_{ } and ccl_{ }, &c.--are entirely unlike both in type and in chemical properties. this absence of analogy in carbon and sulphur is especially clearly seen in the fact that the highest saline oxides are of different composition, co_{ } for carbon, and so_{ } for sulphur. in chapter viii. we considered the limit to which carbon tends in its compounds, and in a similar manner there is for every element in its compounds a tendency to attain a certain highest limit rx_{_n_}. this view was particularly developed in the middle of the present century by frankland in studying the metallo-organic compounds, _i.e._ those in which x is wholly or partially a hydrocarbon radicle; for instance, x = ch_{ } or c_{ }h_{ } &c. thus, for example, antimony, sb (chapter xix.) gives, with chlorine, compounds sbcl_{ } and sbcl_{ } and corresponding oxygen compounds sb_{ }o_{ } and sb_{ }o_{ }, whilst under the action of ch_{ }i, c_{ }h_{ }i, or in general ei (where e is a hydrocarbon radicle of the paraffin series), upon antimony or its alloy with sodium there are formed sbe_{ } (for example, sb(ch_{ })_{ }, boiling at about °), which, corresponding to the lower form of combination sbx_{ }, are able to combine further with ei, or cl_{ }, or o, and to form compounds of the limiting type sbx_{ }; for example, sbe_{ }cl corresponding to nh_{ }cl with the substitution of nitrogen by antimony, and of hydrogen by the hydrocarbon radicle. the elements which are most chemically analogous are characterised by the fact of their giving compounds of similar form rx_{_n_}. the halogens which are analogous give both higher and lower compounds. so also do the metals of the alkalis and of the alkaline earths. and we saw that this analogy extends to the composition and properties of the nitrogen and hydrogen compounds of these metals, which is best seen in the salts. many such groups of analogous elements have long been known. thus there are analogues of oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon, and we shall meet with many such groups. but an acquaintance with them inevitably leads to the questions, what is the cause of analogy and what is the relation of one group to another? if these questions remain unanswered, it is easy to fall into error in the formation of the groups, because the notions of the degree of analogy will always be relative, and will not present any accuracy or distinctness thus lithium is analogous in some respects to potassium and in others to magnesium; beryllium is analogous to both aluminium and magnesium. thallium, as we shall afterwards see and as was observed on its discovery, has much kinship with lead and mercury, but some of its properties appertain to lithium and potassium. naturally, where it is impossible to make measurements one is reluctantly obliged to limit oneself to approximate comparisons, founded on apparent signs which are not distinct and are wanting in exactitude. but in the elements there is one accurately measurable property, which is subject to no doubt--namely, that property which is expressed in their atomic weights. its magnitude indicates the relative mass of the atom, or, if we avoid the conception of the atom, its magnitude shows the relation between the masses forming the chemical and independent individuals or elements. and according to the teaching of all exact data about the phenomena of nature, the mass of a substance is that property on which all its remaining properties must be dependent, because they are all determined by similar conditions or by those forces which act in the weight of a substance, and this is directly proportional to its mass. therefore it is most natural to seek for a dependence between the properties and analogies of the elements on the one hand and their atomic weights on the other. this is the fundamental idea which leads _to arranging all the elements according to their atomic weights_. a periodic repetition of properties is then immediately observed in the elements. we are already familiar with examples of this:-- f = , cl = · , br = , i = , na = , k = , rb = , cs = , mg = , ca = , sr = , ba = . the essence of the matter is seen in these groups. the halogens have smaller atomic weights than the alkali metals, and the latter than the metals of the alkaline earths. therefore, _if all the elements be arranged in the order of their atomic weights, a periodic repetition of properties is obtained_. this is expressed by the _law of periodicity_, _the properties of the elements, as well as the forms and properties of their compounds, are in periodic dependence or (expressing ourselves algebraically) form a periodic function of the atomic weights of the elements_.[ ] table i. of _the periodic system of the elements_, which is placed at the very beginning of this book, is designed to illustrate this law. it is arranged in conformity with the eight types of oxides described in the preceding pages, and those elements which give the oxides, r_{ }o and consequently salts rx, form the st group; the elements giving r_{ }o_{ } or ro as their highest grade of oxidation belong to the nd group; those giving r_{ }o_{ } as their highest oxides form the rd group, and so on; whilst the elements of all the groups which are nearest in their atomic weights are arranged in series from to . the even and uneven series of the same groups present the same forms and limits, but differ in their properties, and therefore two contiguous series, one even and the other uneven--for instance, the th and th--form a period. hence the elements of the th, th, th, th, and th, or of the rd, th, th, th, and th, series form analogues, like the halogens, the alkali metals, &c. the conjunction of two series, one even and one contiguous uneven series, thus forms one large _period_. these periods, beginning with the alkali metals, end with the halogens. the elements of the first two series have the lowest atomic weights, and in consequence of this very circumstance, although they bear the general properties of a group, they still show many peculiar and independent properties.[ ] thus fluorine, as we know, differs in many points from the other halogens, and lithium from the other alkali metals, and so on. these lightest elements may be termed _typical elements_. they include-- h. li, be, b, c, n, o, f. na, mg.... in the annexed table all the remaining elements are arranged, not in groups and series, but _according to periods_. in order to understand the essence of the matter, it must be remembered that here the atomic weight gradually increases along a given line; for instance, in the line commencing with k = and ending with br = , the intermediate elements have intermediate atomic weights, as is clearly seen in table iii., where the elements stand in the order of their atomic weights. i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii. i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii. { even series. } mg al si p s cl k ca sc ti v cr mn fe co ni cu zn ga ge as se br rb sr y zr nb mo -- ru rh pd ag cd in sn sb te i cs ba la ce di? -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- yb -- ta w -- os ir pt au hg tl pb bi -- -- -- -- -- th -- u { uneven series } the same degree of analogy that we know to exist between potassium, rubidium, and cæsium; or chlorine, bromine, and iodine; or calcium, strontium, and barium, also exists between the elements of the other vertical columns. thus, for example, zinc, cadmium, and mercury, which are described in the following chapter, present a very close analogy with magnesium. for a true comprehension of the matter[ ] it is very important to see that all the aspects of the distribution of the elements according to their atomic weights essentially express one and the same fundamental _dependence_--_periodic properties_.[ ] the following points then must be remarked in it. [ ] the periodic law and the periodic system of the elements appeared in the same form as here given in the first edition of this work, begun in and finished in . in laying out the accumulated information respecting the elements, i had occasion to reflect on their mutual relations. at the beginning of i distributed among many chemists a pamphlet entitled 'an attempted system of the elements, based on their atomic weights and chemical analogies,' and at the march meeting of the russian chemical society, , i communicated a paper 'on the correlation of the properties and atomic weights of the elements.' the substance of this paper is embraced in the following conclusions: ( ) the elements, if arranged according to their atomic weights, exhibit an evident _periodicity_ of properties. ( ) elements which are similar as regards their chemical properties have atomic weights which are either of nearly the same value (platinum, iridium, osmium) or which increase regularly (_e.g._ potassium, rubidium, cæsium). ( ) the arrangement of the elements or of groups of elements in the order of their atomic weights corresponds with their so-called _valencies_. ( ) the elements, which are the most widely distributed in nature, have _small_ atomic weights, and all the elements of small atomic weight are characterised by sharply defined properties. they are therefore typical elements. ( ) the _magnitude_ of the atomic weight determines the character of an element. ( ) the discovery of many yet unknown elements may be expected. for instance, elements analogous to aluminium and silicon, whose atomic weights would be between and . ( ) the atomic weight of an element may sometimes be corrected by aid of a knowledge of those of the adjacent elements. thus the combining weight of tellurium must lie between and , and cannot be . ( ) certain characteristic properties of the elements can be foretold from their atomic weights. the entire periodic law is included in these lines. in the series of subsequent papers ( - , for example, in the _transactions_ of the russian chemical society, of the moscow meeting of naturalists, of the st. petersburg academy, and liebig's _annalen_) on the same subject we only find applications of the same principles, which were afterwards confirmed by the labours of roscoe, carnelley, thorpe, and others in england; of rammelsberg (cerium and uranium), l. meyer (the specific volumes of the elements), zimmermann (uranium), and more especially of c. winkler (who discovered germanium, and showed its identity with ekasilicon), and others in germany; of lecoq de boisbaudran in france (the discoverer of gallium = ekaaluminium); of clève (the atomic weights of the cerium metals), nilson (discoverer of scandium = ekaboron), and nilson and pettersson (determination of the vapour density of beryllium chloride) in sweden; and of brauner (who investigated cerium, and determined the combining weight of tellurium = ) in austria, and piccini in italy. i consider it necessary to state that, in arranging the periodic system of the elements, i made use of the previous researches of dumas, gladstone, pettenkofer, kremers, and lenssen on the atomic weights of related elements, but i was not acquainted with the works preceding mine of de chancourtois (_vis tellurique_, or the spiral of the elements according to their properties and equivalents) in france, and of j. newlands (law of octaves--for instance, h, f, cl, co, br, pd, i, pt form the first octave, and o, s, fe, se, rh, te, au, th the last) in england, although certain germs of the periodic law are to be seen in these works. with regard to the work of prof. lothar meyer respecting the periodic law (notes and ), it is evident, judging from the method of investigation, and from his statement (liebig's _annalen, supt. band _, , ), at the very commencement of which he cites my paper of above mentioned, that he accepted the periodic law in the form which i proposed. in concluding this historical statement i consider it well to observe that no law of nature, however general, has been established all at once; its recognition is always preceded by many hints; the establishment of a law, however, does not take place when its significance is recognised, but only when it has been confirmed by experiment, which the man of science must consider as the only proof of the correctness of his conjectures and opinions. i therefore, for my part, look upon roscoe, de boisbaudran, nilson, winkler, brauner, carnelley, thorpe, and others who verified the adaptability of the periodic law to chemical facts, as the true founders of the periodic law, the further development of which still awaits fresh workers. [ ] this resembles the fact, well known to those having an acquaintance with organic chemistry, that in a series of homologues (chapter viii.) the first members, in which there is the least carbon, although showing the general properties of the homologous series, still present certain distinct peculiarities. [ ] besides arranging the elements (_a_) in a successive order according to their atomic weights, with indication of their analogies by showing some of the properties--for instance, their power of giving one or another form of combination--both of the _elements_ and of their compounds (as is done in table iii. and in the table on p. ), (_b_) according to periods (as in table i. at the commencement of volume i. after the preface), and (_c_) according to groups and series or small periods (as in the same tables), i am acquainted with the following methods of expressing the periodic relations of the elements: ( ) by a curve drawn through points obtained in the following manner: the elements are arranged along the horizontal axis as abscissæ at distances from zero proportional to their atomic weights, whilst the values for all the elements of some property--for example, the specific volumes or the melting points, are expressed by the ordinates. this method, although graphic, has the theoretical disadvantage that it does not in any way indicate the existence of a limited and definite number of elements in each period. there is nothing, for instance, in this method of expressing the law of periodicity to show that between magnesium and aluminium there can be no other element with an atomic weight of, say, , atomic volume , and in general having properties intermediate between those of these two elements. the actual periodic law does not correspond with a continuous change of properties, with a continuous variation of atomic weight--in a word, it does not express an uninterrupted function--and as the law is purely chemical, starting from the conception of atoms and molecules which combine in multiple proportions, with intervals (not continuously), it _above all_ depends on there being but few types of compounds, which are arithmetically simple, _repeat themselves_, and offer no uninterrupted transitions, so that each period can only contain a definite number of members. for this reason there can be no other elements between magnesium, which gives the chloride mgcl_{ }, and aluminium, which forms alx_{ }; there is a break in the continuity, according to the law of multiple proportions. the periodic law ought not, therefore, to be expressed by geometrical figures in which continuity is always understood. owing to these considerations i never have and never will express the periodic relations of the elements by any geometrical figures. ( ) _by a plane spiral._ radii are traced from a centre, proportional to the atomic weights; analogous elements lie along one radius, and the points of intersection are arranged in a spiral. this method, adopted by de chancourtois, baumgauer, e. huth, and others, has many of the imperfections of the preceding, although it removes the indefiniteness as to the number of elements in a period. it is merely an attempt to reduce the complex relations to a simple graphic representation, since the equation to the spiral and the number of radii are not dependent upon anything. ( ) _by the lines of atomicity_, either parallel, as in reynolds's and the rev. s. haughton's method, or as in crookes's method, arranged to the right and left of an axis, along which the magnitudes of the atomic weights are counted, and the position of the elements marked off, on the one side the members of the even series (paramagnetic, like oxygen, potassium, iron), and on the other side the members of the uneven series (diamagnetic, like sulphur, chlorine, zinc, and mercury). on joining up these points a periodic curve is obtained, compared by crookes to the oscillations of a pendulum, and, according to haughton, representing a cubical curve. this method would be very graphic did it not require, for instance, that sulphur should be considered as bivalent and manganese as univalent, although neither of these elements gives stable derivatives of these natures, and although the one is taken on the basis of the lowest possible compound sx_{ }, and the other of the highest, because manganese can be referred to the univalent elements only by the analogy of kmno_{ } to kclo_{ }. furthermore, reynolds and crookes place hydrogen, iron, nickel, cobalt, and others outside the axis of atomicity, and consider uranium as bivalent without the least foundation. ( ) rantsheff endeavoured to classify the elements in their periodic relations by a system dependent on solid geometry. he communicated this mode of expression to the russian chemical society, but his communication, which is apparently not void of interest, has not yet appeared in print. ( ) _by algebraic formulæ_: for example, e. j. mills ( ) endeavours to express all the atomic weights by the logarithmic function a = (_n_ - · _t_), in which the variables _n_ and _t_ are whole numbers. for instance, for oxygen _n_ = , _t_ = ; hence a = · ; for antimony _n_ = , _t_ = ; whence a = , and so on. _n_ varies from to and _t_ from to . the analogues are hardly distinguishable by this method: thus for chlorine the magnitudes of _n_ and _t_ are and ; for bromine and ; for iodine and ; for potassium and ; for rubidium and ; for cæsium and ; but a certain regularity seems to be shown. ( ) a more natural method of expressing the dependence of the properties of elements on their atomic weights is obtained by _trigonometrical functions_, because this dependence is periodic like the functions of trigonometrical lines, and therefore ridberg in sweden (lund, ) and f. flavitzky in russia (kazan, ) have adopted a similar method of expression, which must be considered as worthy of being worked out, although it does not express the absence of intermediate elements--for instance, between magnesium and aluminium, which is essentially the most important part of the matter. ( ) the investigations of b. n. tchitchérin ( , _journal of the russian physical and chemical society_) form the first effort in the latter direction. he carefully studied the alkali metals, and discovered the following simple relation between their atomic volumes: they can all be expressed by a( - · a_n_), where a is the atomic weight and _n_ = for lithium and sodium, / for potassium, / for rubidium, and / for cæsium. if _n_ always = , then the volume of the atom would become zero at a = - / , and would reach its maximum when a = - / , and the density increases with the growth of a. in order to explain the variation of _n_, and the relation of the atomic weights of the alkali metals to those of the other elements, as also the atomicity itself, tchitchérin supposes all atoms to be built up of a primary matter; he considers the relation of the central to the peripheric mass, and, guided by mechanical principles, deduces many of the properties of the atoms from the reaction of the internal and peripheric parts of each atom. this endeavour offers many interesting points, but it admits the hypothesis of the building up of all the elements from one primary matter, and at the present time such an hypothesis has not the least support either in theory or in fact. besides which the starting-point of the theory is the specific gravity of the metals at a definite temperature (it is not known how the above relation would appear at other temperatures), and the specific gravity varies even under mechanical influences. l. hugo ( ) endeavoured to represent the atomic weights of li, na, k, rb, and cs by geometrical figures--for instance, li = represents a central atom = and six atoms on the six terminals of an octahedron; na, is obtained by applying two such atoms on each edge of an octahedron, and so on. it is evident that such methods can add nothing new to our data respecting the atomic weights of analogous elements. [ ] many natural phenomena exhibit a dependence of a periodic character. thus the phenomena of day and night and of the seasons of the year, and vibrations of all kinds, exhibit variations of a periodic character in dependence on time and space. but in ordinary periodic functions one variable varies continuously, whilst the other increases to a limit, then a period of decrease begins, and having in turn reached its limit a period of increase again begins. it is otherwise in the periodic function of the elements. here the mass of the elements does not increase continuously, but abruptly, by steps, as from magnesium to aluminium. so also the valency or atomicity leaps directly from to to , &c., without intermediate quantities, and in my opinion it is these properties which are the most important, and it is their periodicity which forms the substance of the periodic law. it expresses _the properties of the real elements_, and not of what may be termed their manifestations visually known to us. the external properties of elements and compounds are in periodic dependence on the atomic weight of the elements only because these external properties are themselves the result of the properties of the real elements which unite to form the 'free' elements and the compounds. to explain and express the periodic law is to explain and express the cause of the law of multiple proportions, of the difference of the elements, and the variation of their atomicity, and at the same time to understand what mass and gravitation are. in my opinion this is still premature. but just as without knowing the cause of gravitation it is possible to make use of the law of gravity, so for the aims of chemistry it is possible to take advantage of the laws discovered by chemistry without being able to explain their causes. the above-mentioned peculiarity of the laws of chemistry respecting definite compounds and the atomic weights leads one to think that the time has not yet come for their full explanation, and i do not think that it will come before the explanation of such a primary law of nature as the law of gravity. it will not be out of place here to turn our attention to the many-sided correlation existing between the undecomposable _elements and the compound carbon radicles_, which has long been remarked (pettenkofer, dumas, and others), and reconsidered in recent times by carnelley ( ), and most originally in pelopidas's work ( ) on the principles of the periodic system. pelopidas compares the series containing eight hydrocarbon radicles, c_{_n_}h_{ _n_ + }, c_{_n_}h_{ _n_} &c., for instance, c_{ }h_{ }, c_{ }h_{ }, c_{ }h_{ }, c_{ }h_{ }, c_{ }h_{ }, c_{ }h_{ }, c_{ }h_{ }, and c_{ }h_{ }--with the series of the elements arranged in eight groups. the analogy is particularly clear owing to the property of c_{_n_}h_{ _n_+ } to combine with x, thus reaching saturation, and of the following members with x_{ }, x_{ } ... x_{ }, and especially because these are followed by an aromatic radicle--for example, c_{ }h_{ }--in which, as is well known, many of the properties of the saturated radicle c_{ }h_{ } are repeated, and in particular the power of forming a univalent radicle again appears. pelopidas shows a confirmation of the parallel in the property of the above radicles of giving oxygen compounds corresponding with the groups in the periodic system. thus the hydrocarbon radicles of the first group--for instance, c_{ }h_{ } or c_{ }h_{ }--give oxides of the form r_{ }o and hydroxides rho, like the metals of the alkalis; and in the third group they form oxides r_{ }o_{ } and hydrates ro_{ }h. for example, in the series ch_{ } the corresponding compounds of the third group will be the oxide (ch)_{ }o_{ } or c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }--that is, formic anhydride and hydrate, cho_{ }h, or formic acid. in the sixth group, with a composition of c_{ }, the oxide ro_{ } will be c_{ }o_{ }, and hydrate c_{ }h_{ }o_{ }--that is, also a bibasic acid (oxalic) resembling sulphuric, among the inorganic acids. after applying his views to a number of organic compounds, pelopidas dwells more particularly on the radicles corresponding with ammonium. with respect to this remarkable parallelism, it must above all be observed that in the elements the atomic weight increases in passing to contiguous members of a higher valency, whilst here it decreases, which should indicate that the periodic variability of elements and compounds is subject to some higher law whose nature, and still more whose cause, cannot at present be determined. it is probably based on the fundamental principles of the internal mechanics of the atoms and molecules, and as the periodic law has only been generally recognised for a few years it is not surprising that any further progress towards its explanation can only be looked for in the development of facts touching on this subject. . the composition of the higher oxygen compounds is determined by the groups: the first group gives r_{ }o, the second r_{ }o_{ } or ro, the third r_{ }o_{ }, &c. there are eight types of oxides and therefore eight groups. two groups give a period, and the same type of oxide is met with twice in a period. for example, in the period beginning with potassium, oxides of the composition ro are formed by calcium and zinc, and of the composition ro_{ } by molybdenum and tellurium. the oxides of the even series, of the same type, have stronger basic properties than the oxides of the uneven series, and the latter as a rule are endowed with an acid character. therefore the elements which exclusively give bases, like the alkali metals, will be found at the commencement of the period, whilst such purely acid elements as the halogens will be at the end of the period. the interval will be occupied by intermediate elements, whose character and properties we shall afterwards describe. it must be observed that the acid character is chiefly proper to the elements with small atomic weights in the uneven series, whilst the basic character is exhibited by the heavier elements in the even series. hence elements which give acids chiefly predominate among the lightest (typical) elements, especially in the last groups; whilst the heaviest elements, even in the last groups (for instance, thallium, uranium) have a basic character. thus the basic and acid characters of the higher oxides are determined (_a_) by the type of oxide, (_b_) by the even or uneven series, and (_c_) by the atomic weight.[ bis] the groups are indicated by roman numerals from i. to viii. . _the hydrogen compounds_ being volatile or gaseous substances which are prone to reaction--such as hcl, h_{ }o, h_{ }n, and h_{ }c[ ]--are only formed by the elements of the uneven series and higher groups giving oxides of the forms r_{ }o_{_n_}, ro_{ }, r_{ }o_{ }, and ro_{ }. . if an element gives a hydrogen compound, rx_{_m_}, it forms an _organo-metallic compound_ of the same composition, where x = c_{_n_}h_{ _n_ + }; that is, x is the radicle of a saturated hydrocarbon. the elements of the uneven series, which are incapable of giving hydrogen compounds, and give oxides of the forms rx, rx_{ }, r_{x} , also give organo-metallic compounds of this form proper to the higher oxides. thus zinc forms the oxide zno, salts znx_{ } and zinc ethyl zn(c_{ }h_{ })_{ }. the elements of the even series do not seem to form organo-metallic compounds at all; at least all efforts for their preparation have as yet been fruitless--for instance, in the case of titanium, zirconium, or iron. . the atomic weights of elements belonging to contiguous periods differ approximately by ; for example, k