A caution to constables and other inferiour officers, concerned in the execution of the Conventicle-Act with some observations thereupon, humbly offered, by way of advice, to such well-meaning and moderate justices of the peace, as would not willingly ruine their peaceable neighbours, but act (in relation to that act) rather by constraint, than by choice / by Thomas Ellwood. Ellwood, Thomas, 1639-1713. 1683 Approx. 45 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 11 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2003-07 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A39300 Wing E616 ESTC R19625 12675430 ocm 12675430 65536 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A39300) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 65536) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 353:3) A caution to constables and other inferiour officers, concerned in the execution of the Conventicle-Act with some observations thereupon, humbly offered, by way of advice, to such well-meaning and moderate justices of the peace, as would not willingly ruine their peaceable neighbours, but act (in relation to that act) rather by constraint, than by choice / by Thomas Ellwood. Ellwood, Thomas, 1639-1713. [2], 18 p. Printed for William Skeate ..., London : 1683. Reproduction of original in Bodleian Library. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Conventicle act, 1670. Church and state -- England. 2003-02 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2003-03 Aptara Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2003-05 Emma (Leeson) Huber Sampled and proofread 2003-05 Emma (Leeson) Huber Text and markup reviewed and edited 2003-06 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion A CAUTION TO CONSTABLES , And Other INFERIOUR OFFICERS , Concerned in the EXECUTION of the Conventicle-Act . WITH Some Observations thereupon , humbly offered , by way of Advice , to such Well-meaning and Moderate IUSTICES of the PEACE , As would not willingly ruine their peaceable Neighbours , but act ( in relation to that Act ) rather by Constraint , than by Choice . By THOMAS ELLWOOD . Prov. 21. 21. He that followeth after Righteousness and Mercy , findeth Life , Righteousness and Honour . Cat. de Mor. Lib. 3. Dist. 15. Iudicis auxilium sub iniqua Lege rogato , Ipsae etiam Leges cupiunt , ut jure regantur . LONDON , Printed , for William Skeate , and are to be Sold in George-yard in Lombard-street , 1683. A CAUTION TO Constables , &c. HAving observed of late , that divers Constables and other inferiour Officers , have either run themselves within the danger of the Law , or brought upon themselves trouble of mind , by acting too officiously against their honest Neighbours , upon the Conventicle-Act , at the Instigation of ( that shame of Christianity , and Pest of Mankind ) Informers ; and considering with my self , that this Mischief for the most part happens through fear , occasioned by want of a right understanding what is positively required of them by that Act , what not : I thought I should do no unacceptable Work , in presenting the following Observations upon that Act , by way of Cautionary Information , to the view and consideration of such of those Officers , as are willing to act warily with respect to themselves , and yet favourably with respect to their peaceable Neighbours . First then , be pleas'd to observe , That no Constable , or other Officer , is bound to be an Attendant upon an Informer , to be at his Reck , and run like a Lacquey after him whensoever , or whethersoever he shall think fit to call him . The Officer is not obliged to stay at home , to wait the Informer's coming : but is at liberty to follow his own Affairs , and to go whithersoever his own Occasions draw , or his Inclinations lead him . And if casually the Informer light upon him , either at home or abroad , and inform him of a Meeting or Conventicle within his Parish or Precinct , he is not bound to take notice of it , unless he take the Information to be credible . For that is the Word used in the Act in this very Case , viz. Be it further Enacted , &c. That is any Constable , &c. who shall know or be credibly informed of any such Meetings , &c. So that it is not every idle and groundless Information from sorry Fellows of no repute nor credit , the Officer is obliged to take notice of ; but such Informations only as are credible , ( or his own knowledg ) upon which he is required to act . And by his own knowledg here , is to be understood a certain knowledg , a personal knowledg , not a knowledg by Heresay , Report , or common Fame only ; for that may be as little credible , as the least credible Information . The Officer then it seems , must have either a personal and certain knowledg , or such an Information as he shall judg credible , that there is an unlawful Assembly or Meeting in his Parish , before he is obliged to stir . 2. And if the Officer should receive a credible Information of such a Meeting ; yet he is not bound to wait upon the Informer to the place where he informs the Meeting is : But the first thing that is required of the Officer by this Act is , to give in Information thereof some Justice of the Peace . And having done that , then in the next place to endeavour the Conviction of the Parties according to his Duty . For so are the Words of the Act , viz. [ Be it Enacted &c. That if any Constable &c. who shall know , or be credible informed of any such Meetings , or Conventicles held within his Precincts , Parish or Limits , and shall not give Information thereof to some Iustice of the Peace , or the chief Magistrate and endeavour the Conviction of the Parties according to his Duty ; But , &c. ] Instead of which , many Constables , and other Officers , are trickt in by cunning and swaggering Informers , to go along with them to Meetings , and there take Observations of the persons present ( yea , and sometimes also to inform the Informer who the persons are , and where they live ) and from thence wait on the Informer to the Justice , and so are unawares drawn in by the Informer , to joyn with him in swearing against their Neighbours ; thereby unadvisedly bringing their quiet Neighbours into needless trouble , and themselves under the foul Brand , and hated Name of being themselves Informers also . Now all this is more than the Officers are obliged to do . 1. They are not bound to go with the Informer , to the place where he shall tell them there is a Meeting . 2. Neither if they do go with him , are they bound to tell him the Names , or places of abode , of any persons that they shall see there . 3. Neither are they bound to go with him to a Justice , nor yet , without him , to the same Justice that he goes to . But when they have received the Informer's information , leaving him to pursue his own projects , they are to repair to some Justice , or chief Magistrate ( and it is in their own choice to what Justice they will go ) and give him Information thereof , if they think it Credible . And although they are further required , after such Information given to the Justice , to endeavour the Conviction of the Parties : yet that is to be done but according to their duty . And sure it is not the duty of Officers to turn Informers . They would be very troublesome and thankless Officers indeed , if all Constables , Headboroughs , Tithingmen , Church-wardens and Overseers of the Poor , should be bound by the duty of their Offices to turn Informers . 3. These Officers would not be so scared by Informers , nor terrified with the talk of forfeiting 51. if they did rightly understand and well consider how hard a thing it is , for them to be Convicted by this Act. The words of the Act are these , viz. [ But such Constables , &c. shall wilfully and wittingly omit the performance of his Duty in the execution of this Act , and be thereof convicted in manner aforesaid , he shall forfeit for every such offence the sum of 5 l. ] Observe here , the Officer doth not forfeit 5 l. unless he be convicted of omitting the performance of his duty wilfully and wittingly . And this Conviction must be made either by the Confession of the Party , or Oath of two Witnesses , or by notorious Evidence and Circumstance of the Fact. As to the Confession of the Party , that need not be : for no man is bound to accuse himself ; and he has not much Wit , sure , that will , especially in such a case as this . The second way of Conviction is by the Oath of two Witnesses . But how is it possible for two Witnesses to swear ( unless they be such as regard not what they swear ) that the Officer did wilfully and wittingly omit the performance of his duty ? Such Witnesses put their Ears in the Officers hands , as having a mind ( one would think ) to look through the Pillory . And indeed , scarce any would dare to swear so desperately , that had not deserved the Pillory before . Then for the notorious Evidence and Circumstance of the Fact ( the onely remaining way of proof ) how can it be thereby proved that the Officer did willfully and wittingly , omit the performance of his duty , when so many just excuses may be alleadged , as of Absence , Illness , Urgency of Business , Ignorance , Misunderstanding , and the like ; all which , if the Officer fined , do appeal , a Jury of his Neighbours is to try . And besides , it is a Question among the Lawyers , how this sine or forfeiture of 5 l. can be levied upon the Officers , there not being in the Act , any particular and express direction for the levying of it ; as there is in the other Cases , both of the Meeters and of the Justice : for it is not to be supposed , that the Officers of a Town or Parish , should levy the fine upon themselves ; and it they do not , none else is required or impowered by the Act to do it . 4. If a Warrant under the hand and Seal of a Justice of the Peace , be delivered to any Constable , or other inferiour Officer , to levy any fines upon the Goods and Chattels of any person within his Limit , such Warrant ought to express for what Offence the Conviction was made , and at what time the Offence was committed ; which if it do not , the Warrant is not formal , nor good in Law , to make a distress by . 5. But if the Warrant be formal and sufficient , yet the Officer cannot thereby justifie the breaking open any dwelling House , or Out-house belonging thereunto , to take distress ( no , not although the Warrant should expressly require it ) as the Opinion of able Lawyers is : For a man's House is to him as a Castle of Defence , and so is every part or room therein . And therefore , as the Officer may not break or force open any Door or Lock to get into a man's House : so if , finding the outward Door open , he be got in , he may not break or force open any Doors or Locks , to get into any other parts or Rooms in the House , that are lock't ; but must content himself with what he finds there . Neither may he climb over any Hatch , or in at any Window , whether it be the Shop-window or other : for the entring through or in at any Window , though open , is held by Lawyers to be a breach of the House : Nor is he bound to lie perdue , and wait continually at the Door to get an entrance ; but may take such times and seasons for it as he shall judg most fit and proper : for he is not wholly to neglect his own Occasions to attend upon this . That were a way to ruine the Officers , as well as their Neighbours , onely to enrich the Informers . But if , as often as the Officer comes , he shall find the Doors shut , and entrance upon demand denied him , and no Distress to be taken without Doors ; he need not fear the penalty of forfeiting 5 l. or that he can possibly be convicted of wilfully and wittingly omitting the performance of his Duty in that respect . And besides , it is the Opinion of some Lawyers , that the penalty of 5 l. is not imposeable upon the Officers for not levying the fines imposed upon others ; but only for not Informing the Justices , and endeavouring the Conviction of the Parties according to their duty . And the Reason of such their Opinion is this , that in that part of the Act where the said Officers are authorized and required to levy the said fines , there is no mention of any forfeiture on their part , for not doing it . And in this part of the Act , where the 5 l. forfeiture is imposed , there is no express mention of levying the Fine upon others . It is said here indeed [ If he shall wilfully and wittingly omit the performance of his Duty ] but the word [ Duty ] being mentioned just before , with particular relation to his informing the Justice , and endeavouring the conviction of the Parties , that wilful and witting omission of Duty , to which the forfeiture of 5 l. is annexed , must ( say they ) by intendment be restrained or applied only to the subject matter of that branch of the Act , and be extended no further than to the neglect of that Duty , therein particularly enjoyned . But of this let Lawyers judg . 6. If the Constable , or other Officer , hath opportunity and open way to make Distress , yet he is not bound to take more than the Fine comes to ; but he may ( and indeed in Justice ought ) proportion the Distress in its real value , as near to the Fine as he can . And when he hath so done , and taken such Distress into his custody , he is not bound to drive or carry , the Goods so distrained , to any Fair or Market , out of the Limits of his Constableship , to fell ; for he is not to act any thing in relation to his Office , further than those limits extend ( save only in some especial cases , where he is particularly necessitated , or impowered by Act of Parliament to go further , which in this Case he is not . ) Nor may he imbezil any of the Goods , for he is accomptable for every particular of what he hath so distrained . Nor is he bound to sell such Goods at under rates , and below the real worth or Market-price of such Commodities ; but having offered them to publick Sale , and tried the Markets , Fairs and Chapmen , within his Liberty , if none will give a reasonable price for them , he is not bound forth with to sell them , but may keep them in hopes of a better Market . And if they remain unsold till he is out of his Office , if he then return them again to him from whom he took them , I know no danger he can incur thereby ; I am sure I have known it done without any detriment to him that did it . But if he be not willing to return them , he will do well to consider how he can justly keep them ( being out of his Office , and then but a private man ) or safely turn them over to any other , without good security to indempnifie him , in case he from whom they were taken ; should hereafter call him to account for them . Some Observations upon the Conventicle-Act , humbly offered , by way of Advice , to such well-meaning and moderate Justices of the Peace , as would not willingly ruin their Peaceable Neighbours , &c. WHen I consider the quality and qualifications of Iustices of the Peace , how many of them are profest Lawyers , and how generally they are ( or at least should be ) Men of Learning and Knowledg , in those Laws especially by which they are to act ; I am ready to with-draw my Pen and desist , out of a modest fear , least it should be thought presumption in me , to offer Advice to them , who are so much better able to give it . But when , on the other hand , I call to mind , that many great and very wise men , have not disdained to hear , what some , as mean , it may be , as my self , have had to say , I am thence again emboldned to go on , hoping that what is so well intended , will not be ill taken . They that have suffered by this Act , and are still liable to suffer more , may be allowed to have looked more narrowly into it , than others , who are not under its lash . And if upon a thorow search , any thing can be found in the Act it self , which may fairly be made use of to abate , in any measure , the force of the blow which we lie under , I hope none will blame us , for modestly representing it to those , by whose hands the stroke is appointed to be given . And in this confidence I proceed . Observ. 1. Since the Title of the Act ; ( which is not unaptly called the Key , because it opens the Intention and purpose of the Law-makers therein ) and the Preamble of the Act also , describes the Assemblies and Meetings designed by this Act to be suppressed , to be Seditious Conventicles , and the persons against whom this Act was made , to be Seditious and disloyal Persons , who under pretence of tender Cons●t●nces , have or may at their Meetings contrive Insurrections ; it seems but reasonable that a Justice of the Peace , when Informers come before him , to inform against any person for being at a Conventicle or Meeting , may examine them , severally and apart , what Token of Sedion they saw or heard in that Assembly , which they inform against ? If there were any Sedition there , it must appear in word of Action : and of that it may be expected the Informers should give Account . If there were no Seditious words spoken , no Seditious Cestures used , why should it be taken for a Seditious Meeting , and the persons punisht for what they are not , nay , for what they most abhor to be ? Besides it rarely happens but the Justice him self both knows , what sort of people they are that are informed against , and is more or less acquainted with some of them . Now if he be so , and upon his own knowledge of the Persons or their Principles , be perswaded and satisfied in his own Conscience , that they are not Seditious or disloyal Persons , that they never have contrived Insurrections at their Meetings ; nor is it consistent with their Principle so to do ; hath he not good cause then to reject such Information , and let such peaceable Meetings and Meeters alone , as not coming within the Intention of the Act ? 2. Since that which the Act calls an Offence , is by the express words of the Act declared to be , Any persons , of the Age of 16 years , and more in number than four besides the Family , being present at any Assembly , &c. under Colour or Pretence of any Exercise of Religion , in other manner than according to the Liturgy and Practice of the Church of England ; and directs that this Offence must be proved to the Justice , either by Confession of the Party , or Oath of two Witnesses , or by notorious Evidence and Circumstance of the Fact : It seems reasonable that the Justice may put the Informers to prove every part of this Offence . For the Offence consists of many Particulars . The Offender must be 16 years old ; He must be a Subject of this Realm ; ( whence quere whether Scottish and Irishmen , though living in England , are not exempt ) He must be one above four besides the Family ; He must be met under Colour or Pretence of some Exercise of Religion , and that Exercise of Religion must be in other manner than according to the Liturgy and Practice of the Church of England . All these must go to the making up of the Offence , and the Offence so made up must be proved : and if any of these be wanting , or the Proof fail in any of these , it is then no Offence within this Statute . Now the Onus Probandi , the Burden of proving , this lies upon the Informers , and that with great Reason and Justice , according to the known Maxim , Affirmanti incumbit Probatio ; He that affirms must prove : And he must prove all that he affirms . But the Informers must affirm every one of these Particulars , in order to make it an Offence within the Act , and therefore they must prove every one of them also . 'T is true , the Party informed against may be Confession convict himself , if he please ; but it is at his own pleasure whether he will or no : And if he do not , the next way of Proof is the Oath of two Witnesses . And I conceive that if the Party should confess he was at a Meeting , and that there were more there present than four besides the Family , yet this would not subject him to the Penalties of the Act : for this he might be justifiably enough , unless he would also confess the others parts , essential to an Offence within the Act , viz. that he met there under Colour or Pretence of some Exercise of Religion , and that it was in other manner than according to the Liturgy , &c. Now as the Parties Confessing some parts only , and not every part of the Offence , would not Convict him of the Offence , nor Subject him to the Penalties of the Act : so neither will the Informers Swearing some parts only , and not every part of the Offence , convict the Party against whom they so swear , or subject him to the Penalties of the Act. As therefore it is but reasonable that the Justice should see due and full Proof made against the Party , in every particular Branch of the Offence , before he makes Record of it as an Offence , in order to convict the Party thereof : so it may reasonablely be supposed , that if the Justices would hold the Informers closely to their Evidence , and examin them strictly and punctually concerning their knowledge , in every particular of the Offence they complain of , they might ease themselves of a great deal of trouble , and their honest Neighbours of a great deal of wrong . For how could Informers dare to Swear , that the Parties informed against , did meet under Colour of Pretence of some Exercise of Religion , and not really and sincerely in the Exercise of Religion ? Or how could Informers take upon them to Swear , that that Exercise of Religion was in other manner than according to the Liturgy , &c. unless they were present the whole time of the Meeting , from the very beginning to the very end thereof ( which they rarely , if ever , are ) and heard and saw whatsoever was said or done there ? And unless they themselves also better understood , than they commonly do , what is according to the Liturgy , what not ? 3. Since by the Stat. 18. Eliz. 5. it is provided , that Informers for certain Offences therein exprest , shall not only stand on the Pillory , and be for ever disabled from being Informers more , but also , in some Cases shall pay unto the Defendant his Costs , Charges and Damages , and in other Cases shall forfeit the Sum of 10 l. It seems reasonable , that a Justice may demand an Account of the Habitation and Ability of any Person , that offers himself as an Informer ; that so he may be satisfied of the Informer's Sufficientcy to answer the Law , in such respects . And if the Informer cannot give the Justice a good and satisfactory Account of himself , there is no reason sure that the Justice should be obliged to take his Information . And since that Act of the Queen is still in force , ( being made perpetual by 27 Eliz. 10. ) I humbly offer it to the Justices Consideration , whether they ought not so far to take notice thereof , as not to admit every idle Vagabond , and beggarly Runnagate to be an Informer , who is so far from having 10 l. that some of them have scarce a pair of whole Ears , to answer the Law withal . 4. It seems very strange to some , that they should be convicted and never convened , be fined and not know of it ( unless casually by report ) till the Officers come to distrine for the Fine . This being a course so directly contrary to all Legal Procedures in all Ages , and condemned by the Practice not only of Christians and Jews , but of very Heathens also ; gives the greater cause of wonder and amazement , that it should be used by any now . The practice of Christendom in this Case is well known . Among the Jews the Witnesses were not only to be present , but to lay their hands on the head of the Party whom they witnessed against , while Sentence was given against him , as Godwyn shews in his Moses and Aaron , l. 5. c. 6. And our Saviour Christ , when the Scribes and Pharisees brought a Woman unto him , whom they accused of Adultery , and then slipt away themselves ; took that occasion to dismiss the Woman , saying , Woman , where are those thine Accusers ? John 8. 10. Doth our Law judg any man before it hear him , and know what he doth , said Nicodemus a Pharisee , Iohn 7. 51 ? For Instances are among the Heathens , not to search prophane Authors , the Scriptures tells us , That the Roman Claudius Lysius , when he sent Paul Prisoner to Felix , gave commandment to his Accusers to go also , and say before Felix what they had against him , Acts 23. 30. And Felix having received the Prisoner , told him , I will hear thee when thy Accusers are also come , ver . 35. And accordingly , when his Accusers were come , he brought them Face to Face , Chap. 24. 2. & ver . 8. 19. And indeed , Paul seems to claim it as his Right , when speaking of certain Jews of Asia , ( that were the first Occasion of his Trouble , Chap. 21. 27. ) he saies , who ought to have been before thee , and object , if they had ought against me , Chap. 24. 18. 19. And he might well claim it as his Right , since it was according to the Roman Law , as Festus answered the Jews ; It is not the manner of the Romans to deliver any man to die , before that he which is accused , have the Accuser face to face , and have Licence to answer for himself concerning the Crime laid against him , Chap. 25. 16. And surely our Laws in general require the same . Nay , in this Act it seems to be plainly intended , that the Party accused or informed against , should be first summoned to appear before the Justice to whom the Information is given , to be examined by the Justice concerning the Offence charged against him , and to make answer for himself . For the first way of Proof appointed by the Act for the Conviction of the Party charged , is his own Confession ; and that must be made before the Justice : For the Words of the Act expresly are , [ upon proof to him made of such offence , either by confession of the Party , or Oath , &c. ] So that the Party ought first to be convened before the Justice , and examined touching the alleadged Offence , in order to his Conviction . And this seems regularly to be the first step towards the Conviction . If the Party accused confess the Offence , there needs no other Proof ; that is sufficient . If he deny it , or do not confess it , in whole , or in part , then ( and not till then ) is other Proof needful : Then the Oath of two Witnesses is required . Moreover , in that part of the Act which directs the Preachers Fine , in some Cases , to be laid upon others , it is said , If he be a Stranger , or is fled and cannot be found ; which implies he ought to be sought after , and found ( if it may be ) before any Fine on him , or on others for him , be set . Again , ( saies the Act ) Or if in the judgment of the Iustice , before whom he shall be Convicted , he shall be thought unable to pay , &c. This again implies he should be brought before the Iustice : for how should the Justice be able to judg of the ability of one he never spake with nor saw ? So that by many strong Implications it appears , that by this Act , as well as by the general course of all Laws , the Party accused ought to be sent for before the Magistrate to whom he is accused , that he may know his Accusers , and have liberty to make his defence , before any penalty be inflicted on him . And if upon his being summoned before the Justice , and denying , or not confessing the Charge , the proof must be made by the Oath of two Witness : surely , methinks both Law and Reason will perswade , that those Witnesses : ought to depose their Evidence in the presence of him , against whom they bear Witness . For besides that it would be an awe upon the Witnesses , to be the more wary what they swear , and more careful to speak the truth , when they see him present who they know can contradict them , if they speak not the truth ; The Law , as I take it , gives liberty of exception ( upon sufficient ground ) against a Witness ; which liberty I am deprived of , if the Witses Depositions be taken in private , and I not suffered to be present to hear what it is that is deposed against me , or see who they are that depose it . Had I been present , I might haply have assigned such lawful exception against the Witness , as might have taken off the Evidence , and acquitted me : or if not so , yet who knows but my presence might have prevented the Witnesses from forswearing themselves against me . However , I had then had my Remedy against them , to recover my Damages of them , if they were able , or at least for their Perjury to have utterly disabled them from such undertakings for the future . But by the Evidence being taken in private , and the Informers concealed , I am deprived of these Benefits and Legal Priviledges : and by such means may the most innocent man be ruined . He that never went to such a Meeting in his Life , may by this means be made to suffer for being at such a Meeting , if a couple of graceless Informers , either out of malice , revenge , advantage or mistake ( and hope of concealment ) shall swear against 〈◊〉 and he has no remedy : for if his Fine do not exceed 10 s. he 〈…〉 the priviledg of an Appeal , but must sit down by the loss . And though 10 s. seems but a little , yet 10 s. a week is 26 l. a year ; and that perhaps by that time it is levied , may be more than — 100 l. damage to him from whom it is taken . However , be the suffering greater or less , the wrong is the same . I entreat the Justices therefore to take this Matter ( of concealing Informers , and receiving the Depositions of Witnesses against men in private , and condemning and sentencing Persons unheard ) into their serious consideration , and do herein as they would be done unto . It was a true saying , though spoken by an Heathen , Qui statuit aliquid parte inaudita altera , Aequum licet sta●uerit , haud aequus fuit , Sen. in Medea , Act. 2. Which may bear this English. He that , but one part heard , a Fine shall-lay , Not hearing what the Accused hath to say : Although his Sentence should prove just , yet he An unjust Iudg w●ll still reputed be . 5. What hath been said of Informers swearing , hath been spoken with respect to present practice only : for otherwise it is the opinion of able Counsel , that no Informer's Oath ought to be taken in this case . And therefore , since the Act directs , that if the Party accused do not confess the Charge , he is to be convicted by the Oath of two Witnesses , it may not be unworthy the Justices consideration , what persons in this Case are fair and legal Witnesses , what not . In which Inquiry I will not insist on that general qualification of a Witness , viz. that he must be Probus & legalis Homo : ( for little Probity to be sure , whatver of Legality in that large Sense , is to be looked for in that sort of men , who commonly turn Informers . ) But I will propose the Question , whether any man can be a fair and lawful Witness , who Swears on his own behalf , and for his own advantage ? If he cannot ( which I suppose will be granted ) then is the Informer excluded from being a Witness , since if he Swear , he Swares clearly ( no man more ) for his advantage : And he is not put upon Swearing , but puts himself upon it , meerly for advantage-sake to himself . If it be said , he Swares for the King ; the Answer is , and for himself too : He swears no more for the King , than he doth for himself ; the King is to have but a third part of the Fines , and the Informer himself as much . If in Trials at Law , no man is admitted for a Witness who is interessed in the Cause , and is to reap advantage by it ; there is then great reason sure , that the Informers should be set aside , in point of Evidence : Since he is not only interessed in the Cause , and to reap advantage by it ; but is Spurr'd on to the undertaking merely by the hope , and desire he hath of gaining thereby . If in a Tryal it should be proved , that a Witness was promised to have so much mony given him , in case by his Evidence the Cause should be gained : Would it not be a fair exception against that Witness , and a just ground to set him aside ? The Informer is the Accuser : and is it reasonable that he should be both Accuser and Witness too ? 'T is he that makes the Complaint : and shall he be admitted to prove his own Complaint by his own Evidence only ! If he hath ought to charge any man with , let him in this , as in all other Cases , make good his Charge by the Evidence of such Witnesses , as are uninteressed in the Cause , and of unsuspected Credit . But this Exception lies not against Informers only , but against all others also who are to reap benifit to themselves , by the Conviction . Such I take to be , The Poor of that Parish where the Offence is alleadged to have been committed : for if the Party accused be convicted , they are to have a third part of the Fine ; so that they , like the Informers , Sweat for their own immediate Advantage ; and therefore , by a Parity of Reason , are equally to be excluded from giving Evidence in such a Case . To these may be added all such as are Rated to the Relief of the Poor in that Parish , where such Offence is alleadged to have been committed . For though these do not , as the former , swear for their own immediate advantage ; yet the Evidence of these doth mediately , and in the Consequences of it , tend to their own advantage , in easing themselves thereby of the Charge of maintaining their Poor , in whole or in part . I could instance a Parish , in which the Overseers of the Poor do at this present forbear making a Rate for the Relief of the Poor , upon a Prospect they have , and a declared expectation , of Monies likely to come in by Fines and Forfeitures upon this Act ; by which they hope and propose to ease the Parish of that Charge . Now is not every Contributer to the Poors Rate in that Parish , justly to excepted against as an Evidence in this Case , when their Evidence so plainly tends to their own advantage and interest ? If a man offer to swear for the enlarging his own Parish-Bounds , he is not allowed for a good Witness , nor will his Evidence be taken in that Case . The Reason is , because by the enlarging his Parish - 〈◊〉 it is supposed some profit or advantage may accrew to him 〈…〉 be so in that Case , why should it not rather be so in this ; the same reason in this Case being no less forcible , and more obvious than in that ? Nor are the Constables and other Officers free from being excepted against as Witnesses in this Case . For the Act giving a third part of the Penalties to the Informers , and to such Person and Persons as the Iustice shall appoint , having regard to their diligence and industry in discovering , dispersing and punishing of the said Conventicles ; it cannot well be understood that this is meant of any other Persons than the Constables , and those other Officers mentioned in the Act , because none but they are authorized to disperse and punish the Conventicles . And therfore , since they are by this Clause of the Act put into a capacity of sharing with the Informers ; ( at the Justice's direction ) and consequently may be tempted with hopes of advantage ; it seems but reasonable that they also should be set aside , in point of Evidence , and that the proof should be made by Persons of other Parishes , to whom no profit can accrew thereby , and against whom no colour of exception may lie . 6. Although the Act doth require every Justice of the Peace , upon Proof made to him , to make a Record of the Offence proved , and thereupon to impose upon the Offender so convicted , for the first Offence 5 s. aud for every after , 10 s. yet it doth not injoyn the Iustice to prosecute . He is not by the letter of the Act expresly injoynned , so much as to issue out a Warrant for the Levying the fine ; much less is he obliged to drive on the Officers to take distress . Nay , it is doubtful to some profest Lawyers , whether a Justice of the Peace may grant such a Warrant , or not ; in as much as in this particular he is not expressly required or authorized so to do , as in other parts of the Act he is . But however , this seems clear , that inasmuch as there is a reasonable ground of Doubt , the Justice doth not incur the forfeiture of 100 l. in case he do refuse to grant such Warrant , provided he ground his Refusal upon that doubt , and declare that to be the reason of his refusal at the time when he so refuses : for then he cannot be convicted of wilfully and wittingly omitting the performance of his Duty , as the words of the Act are in relation to that forfeiture , and which must be proved in order to the Recovery of it 7. The Act doth not inflict the Penalty of 20 l. or 40 l. upon any Person for Praying , as it doth for Preach or Teaching . The Words of the Act are , [ That 〈◊〉 Person who shall take upon him to Preach or Teach in 〈◊〉 ●uch Meeting &c. and shall thereof be convicted as aforesaid ; shall forfeit for every such first offence the sum of 20 l. — And if such Offender , &c. shall at any time again commit the like Offence , &c. and he thereof convicted ; &c. than such Offender so convicted of such like Offence or Offences , shall for every such offence , incur the penalty of 40 l. ] Here the Penalties of 20 l. and 40 l. are restrained to Preaching and Teaching ; Not a Word of Praying . Now Praying is neither Preaching nor Teaching : for Preaching and Teaching are directed to Men , but Prayer is directed to God , whom no man can Teach . If therefore any man shall be informed against for Preaching , and upon Examination it appear that he was only heard to Pray , he cannot be thereby Legally Convicted of being a Preacher , or incur the Fines imposed by the Act on such as Preach or Teach . This has been tried upon an Appeal , and Judgment given for the Appellant . 8. This Act doth not forbid Women to Preach or Teach : For though it seems at first to speak indefinitely of every person , yet it immediately restrains it to the Male Sex , by using the Masculine Gender only , [ Him and His. ] The Words of the Act are , That every person who shall take upon him to preach &c. shall forfeit , &c. to be levied upon his Goods , &c. and if the said Preacher or Teacher be a stranger , and his name not known , &c. ] It is not said , who shall take upon him or her , &c. or to be levied upon his or her Goods , &c. Or if his or her name be not known , &c. as in the next Paragraph of the Act , relating to the Meeting-Places , it is . For there it is said [ That person who shall wittingly or willingly , suffer any such Conventicle , &c. to be held in his or her house , &c. shall forfeit 20. l. to be levied upon his or her Goods , &c. or in case of his or her poverty , &c. ] Here the Gender is very carefully varied . And as this variation of Gender from him to her doth clearly subject Women to the Fines for suffering such Conventicles , mentioned in the Act , at their Houses : So the omi●sion of that variation , and using only the Masculine Gender , Him and His , not Her at all , doth as clearly exempt Women from being fined for Preaching . This also hath been tried upo●● an Appeal , and judgment thereupon given for the Apellant . 9. If above the number of four persons , besides the Family , be met together , and sit in silence , so that the Informers are not able to prove that there was any words spoken among them , and so no overt act of religious Exercise . Such a Meeting hath been adjudged not to come within this Act , nor the Persons so met to be justly liable to any of those Fines , ●mposeable by this Act. For they who are finable by this Act must be such , as are Convicted of having been at a Meeting where was some Exercise of ●el●gion , in other manner than according to the Liturgy , &c. But what Exercise of Religion can those persons be Convicted of , who only sit still ▪ and neither say a●y thing , nor do any thing ? If their minds and spirits be inwardly gathered into a spiritual Exercise towards God , who is the Father of Spirits ; That methinks should not be in other manner than according to the Liturgy and Practice of the Church of England . However , that falls not under the Cognizance of outward Evidence . But that which the Justices may well hold the Informers and their Witnesses to is , what Exercise of Religion they saw there ? And if they are not able to give account of some Exercise of Religion there used , and that in other manner than according to the Liturgy , &c. the Justice hath very good ground to reject their Information . In this Case also upon a Tryal , the Persons so met have been acquitted . 11. And lastly , concerning the House or Place where the Meeting is held , there seems to be a great mistake . For some eager Prosecutors of this Act , for every time that proof hath been made to them , of a Meeting being held at such or such an House , have imposed a fresh Fine for the House , which in my apprehension , ( with submission notwithstanding to more able judgment ) the Act affords no colour for . The words are these [ And be it further enacted by the Authority aforesaid , that every Person who shall wittingly and willingly suffer any such Conventicle , Meeting or unlawful Assembly aforesaid , to be held in his or her house , out-house , Barn , Yard or Back-side , and be convicted thereof in manner aforesaid shall forfeit the sum of 20 l. to be levied in manner aforesaid , upon his or her Goods and Chattels ; or in case of his or her poverty or inability as aforesaid , upon the Goods and Chattels of such persons who shall be convicted in manner aforesaid , of being present at the same Conventicle ; and the Money so levied to be disposed of in manner aforesaid . ] This is the whole of that matter verba●im : In which there is no mention of any more or other than one Fine , and that of 20 l. No iteration or repeating of the Fine , for every such Meeting ; as in other parts of this Act , where the Fine is to be repeated , It is expresly said . For instance , In the case of the Hearer , there is not only the Fine of 5 s. set for the first Offence ; but a double Fine afterwards for every such Offence , expresly . Again , In the case of the Preacher , There is not only the Fine of 20 l. for the first Offence ; but a double Fine afterwards for every such Offence , expresly . Again , In the Case of a Constables wilfully and wittingly ●mitting the performance of his duty , it is said expresly , He shall forfeit for every such Offence the sum of 5 l. But in this Case of the Meeting-House , there is no such Expression used , no such Provision made , no such Direction given , ●o such Course required . Nay , here is not so much as an Implication of a Second ; for the Word [ First ] is not here used , as in the other Cases , of Preacher and Hearer , it is . Now since in all places of the Act , where the Penalty is to be repeated or more than once inflicted ; it is expresly said [ for every such Offence ] which Sentence in this Place is wholly omitted , take it for a very perswasive Argument , That it was never intended any more than one Fine should be set for one Meeting-House , how oft foever met in . But if any apprehend otherwise , and should think the Intention of the Law-makers reacht further ; yet since the Letter of the Law extends no further , since also the Clemency of English Natures hath resolved it into an Axiom , That poenal Laws are to be taken , in mitiori Sens● in the more mild and favourable Sense : there seems to be here at least fair Scope for all ( who would not be Severer than Severity , and even exceed Summum Jus ) to exercise some degree of Compassion towards the afflicted . To which Christian Temper ; and tends frame of Spirit , what words can be more moving and apt to dispose , than those of our blessed Saviour , in his Sermon in the Mount , viz. Blessed are the Merciful ; for they shall obtain Mercy , Mat. 5. 7. THE END .