The Speech of Mr. Higgons in Parliament at the reading of the bill for the militia the twenty second day of May Higgons, Thomas, Sir, 1624-1691. 1661 Approx. 7 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 5 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2009-10 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A43758 Wing H1959 ESTC R30787 11470625 ocm 11470625 47819 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A43758) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 47819) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 1463:37) The Speech of Mr. Higgons in Parliament at the reading of the bill for the militia the twenty second day of May Higgons, Thomas, Sir, 1624-1691. 6 p. Printed for Roger Norton, London : 1661. Reproduction of original in the Harvard University Library. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Divine right of kings. Great Britain -- Militia. 2008-10 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2008-12 SPi Global Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2009-01 Scott Lepisto Sampled and proofread 2009-01 Scott Lepisto Text and markup reviewed and edited 2009-02 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion THE SPEECH OF M r. HIGGONS IN PARLIAMENT At the Reading of the BILL FOR THE MILITIA The Twenty Second Day of MAY. LONDON , Printed by ROGER NORTON , 1661. Mr. Speaker , YOu have a Bill of extraordinary importance now before you , and there are many points of Law in it , which I will not presume to speak to . I shall leave them to the Learned Gentlemen of that Profession , who have spent their time in that noble study . But because all Laws either are , or ought to be grounded upon reason , and all Lawes are to give place to that supream Law of publique safety , I will make bold to speak something to this Bill , though not to the Law , yet to the reasonableness and necessity of it . I believe there is no man but is sensible of the mighty mischiefs that the late dispute of the Militia brought upon this Nation . For what was the fruit of that Dispute , and what liberty did the Contenders purchase , but a liberty to destroy themselves and ruine their Countrey ? a liberty , Mr. Speaker , worse than the worst sort of servitude . If the Question of the Militia had been rightly stated , if it had been declared to be wholly in the King , as without doubt in reason and nature it was , and been settled in him with that latitude and those powers as were requisite for protecting himself and his people , for ought I know , the late war had been prevented and all the calamitous consequences of it . I have ever been of opinion that they who are born under a just , legitimate , and hereditary Monarchy have the same obligations , and owe the same service to their Prince , which the Antients who lived in Common-wealths did to their Countrey . It was an ordinary thing with them to preferr the publick good before their own , and to devote themselves to death , that the place which gave them being might be happy . That zeal which inflamed them with a love to their Countrey ought in my judgement to operate in us for the service of our Prince . For in a Monarchy , the Prince represents the Country ; the Majesty of the Countrey is in him , his welfare is the welfare of the Countrey , and of every particular person in it : It was a celebrated saying of Artabanus Captain of the guard to Xerxes , when Themistocles fled out of Greece to the Court of Persia , Stranger , sayes he , the Customes and manners of men are different , and that is laudable in one Nation which is not so in another . You Greeks affect liberty and equality , and to be one as good as another . But we who are Persians think nothing so great and so honourable as to serve and obey our King , who is the image of the living God. If to serve our King be to serve our Countrey , if the interest of the King be the interest of the publique , if all our lives , safeties , and fortunes are bound up in his , certainly we can not make him too great , or be too concern'd for his preservation . That which first brought men into Societies was the fear they had of one another , and a desire of safety . This made them content to pass away that right which by nature they had to all things , that they might be assured of something : this made them transferr and give up the Dominion of themselves to others . And hence it was that Government arose , from hen●● it was , I mean from the disposing of this ●…inion , that all Governments were denominated ; for where the Dominion is placed in many , there it is a Popular State , where it is in some of the better sort , there it is Aristocracy ; where it is in one alone , there it is Monarchy . Now all these Governments may be convenient in their proper places . But certainly the most absolute , the most noble , and to use the words of Plato , the most divine form of government is that of Monarchy . Under this form of Government , Sir , it is our honour to be born ; to this form of Government we have the happiness to be restored from one of the vilest and miserablest Anarchies that ever any Nation was under . Nor is that all our happiness ; we are not onely restored from the worst fort of Government to the best , but by the great mercy of God delivered from the worst men that ever ruled in the worst kind of Government into the hands of one of the best of Princes . Now Sir , the Question before you is , What power you will allow this Prince for his and your own preservation . The power of the Militia is a thing so inherent in the King , and so inseparable from his person , that without it he cannot perform the ends for which he is a King. He can neither protect us ●…m the attempts of Enemies , nor from the violences of one another . So that of necessity the Militia must be in him , and in him alone : for to divide it betwixt him and any other is a contradiction in the very nature of Government : since where there are two co-ordinate powers in one State , where there are two pretending an equal power to the same thing , and no Superiour to appeal to , the question can not be decided but by force , this force will introduce a war , which must end in the dissolution of the Government . But the Question is not so much where the right of the Militia is ( for I find none expresly deny it to be in his Majesty ) as how far the power of it shall extend , and what restraints and limitations shall be laid upon it . The King , it is confess'd hath power to Levy and Array men , but if he have not power to arm and appoint them as he please when he hath levied and arrayed them , to what purpose will they be levied and arrayed ? or if he have power to levie , array , and arm them , and can not lead them out of one County into another , as occasion shall require , and danger call them , to what purpose will they be armed ? or if he have power to lead them where he please , and can not raise money to maintain them , to what end will he lead them any where ? without pay there will be no Discipline , and Forces without Discipline will be worth nothing . It is as good have no Militia as an ineffectual one , as a Militia which will onely trouble the people and not secure them . It is a vulgar error Sir , that the power of the King is incompetible with the liberty of the people . The restraining of the King does not make the people great , but makes the King and the people both little . It distracts and disunites the Soveraign Power , whereas it is in the union of Power that all Empire consists . And therefore it is my opinion that this Bill as it is penn'd should pass . If I have said any thing , Mr. Speaker , contrary to the sense of this House , as soon as you declare your opinion I shall retract mine . In the mean time I submit my opinion and the reasons of it to your more venerable judgement . FINIS .