A modest vindication of the doctrine of conditions in the Covenant of Grace, and the defenders thereof, from the aspersions of arminianism & popery, which Mr. W. E. cast on them. By the late faithful and godly minister Mr. John Graile, minister of the gospel at Tidworth in the county of Wilts. Published with a preface concerning the nature of the Covenant of Grace, wherein is a discovery of the judgment of Dr. Twisse in the point of justification, clearing him from antinomianism therein. By Constant Jessop, minister of the Gospel at Wimborn minister in the county of Dorset. Whereunto is added, a sermon, preached at the funeral of the said Mr. John Grail. By Humphrey Chambers, D.D. and pastor of the church at Pewsie. Graile, John. 1654 Approx. 290 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 63 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2008-09 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A85510 Wing G1477 Thomason E817_1 Thomason E817_2 ESTC R207370 99866427 99866427 167980 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A85510) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 167980) Images scanned from microfilm: (Thomason Tracts ; 124:E817[1] or 124:E817[2]) A modest vindication of the doctrine of conditions in the Covenant of Grace, and the defenders thereof, from the aspersions of arminianism & popery, which Mr. W. E. cast on them. By the late faithful and godly minister Mr. John Graile, minister of the gospel at Tidworth in the county of Wilts. Published with a preface concerning the nature of the Covenant of Grace, wherein is a discovery of the judgment of Dr. Twisse in the point of justification, clearing him from antinomianism therein. By Constant Jessop, minister of the Gospel at Wimborn minister in the county of Dorset. Whereunto is added, a sermon, preached at the funeral of the said Mr. John Grail. By Humphrey Chambers, D.D. and pastor of the church at Pewsie. Graile, John. Chambers, Humphrey, 1598 or 9-1662. Jessop, Constantine, 1601 or 2-1658. Pauls sad farewel to his Ephesians. [2], 49, [1], 125, [1] p. Printed for Mat. Keinton at the Fountain in Pauls Church-yard, London, : 1655. [i.e. 1654] "The Covenant of Grace, not absolute, but conditional, modestly asserted", with caption title, begins new pagination and register. Within this series, "Pauls sad farevvel to his Ephesians" has separate dated title page. "The Covenant of Grace, not absolute, but conditional, modestly asserted" is identified as Thomason E.817[2]. Annotation on Thomason copy: "Nou: 13"; the 5 in imprint date has been crossed out and date altered to 1654. Reproduction of the original in the British Library. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Church of England -- Doctrines -- Early works to 1800. Covenant theology -- Early works to 1800. Funeral sermons -- 17th century. 2007-09 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2007-11 Aptara Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2008-01 Judith Siefring Sampled and proofread 2008-01 Judith Siefring Text and markup reviewed and edited 2008-02 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion THE COVENANT OF GRACE , Not ABSOLUTE , but CONDITIONAL , Modestly asserted . WHether the Covenant of grace be conditional or absolute , is , saith a Mr. Burges , a very troublesome question . So indeede it proves in places where it is vented . It troubles the faith of some , the lives of others , and the peace of very many . New England hath felt the troubles it occasioned ; And many places in old England are now suffering . I could therefore from my heart have wished that either none at all had broached it in these parts , or if it must have beene published , some other , rather then you , my dearest Friend and Reverend Brother , might have beene the Author of that , meerly out of the great respect and entire affection I beare unto you . But seeing you have not only set it on foote , but when a modest defence was made of the contrary Doctrine , without any either bitter invective against your tenent , or so much as reply unto your Arguments ; you in divers Sermons renewed the quarrel , replied unto the Arguments of the contrary side ; not sparing to asperse them in too open a manner . I thought it my duty I owe to truth , oppugned by , notwithstanding my love unto you , to let you know , both wherein your Reply appears unsatisfactory unto me , and wherein offensive . Of the latter in the first place , which is as followes . First , in the whole series of your discourse , you seemed to me to rank those of our Divines , who hold the covenant of grace to have conditions , in the same file , with Arminians , as if both had maintained the same conditionate redemption or salvability ; wherein , whether you dealt fairly , I refer it to your conscience to consider . Now , though I do not doubt , but that you know full well already how farre we differ from them : yet shall I set downe the difference in some particulars , and then endeavour to satisfie your Arguments , so farre as they seeme to reflect upon our Tenents . The Salvability or potentiall and conditionate redemption maintained by the Arminians , may ( I conceive ) be reduced to these four particulars . 1. That Christ in dying , intended not the salvation of any particular persons . 2. That the end of his death was not to bring some actually to salvation , but only that God thereby might have power ( his justice being satisfied ) to give remission of sins to sinful man , on what conditions he pleased . So that Christ might have had his end , though never a man had been actually saved . 3. That this is the will of God , that none should enjoy remission of sins , but on condition of faith . 4. That Christ hath purchased faith and regeneration for none , but remission and reconciliation for all , which they shall actually partake of , who do believe . Nor is there neede of infusing any spiritual vitall , principle into the hearts of men to enable them to believe , they may doe it of themselves . The third excepted , which of these positions is maintained by any of those our Divines that hold conditions to be in the new Covenant ? Nay , they all maintaine that Christ in dying , intended the actual salvation of particular persons , viz. of all those whom God from all eternity had chosen . That for all those Christ hath obtained the actuall application of salvation to them , as well as the purchase of it for them ; which actual enjoyment of salvation , being according to Gods appointment to be obtained in a way of faith , or upon condition of faith , by or through faith , as the Scripture speaks . They further averre , that the Lord Jesus Christ by his death , hath also obtaind at God the Fathers hands , that the blessed Spirit should in time work this faith in the hearts of his chosen , that so through faith they might come actually to partake of all the benefits which he hath purchased for them . So then , Arminians maintain conditions to be performed by us of our own power : Such ours disclaim , maintaining that it is God that worketh in us both to wil and to do . Arminians maintain conditions so as if the efficacie of Christs death were pendulous thereon ; This also ours disavow , maintaining that Christ hath purchased both salvation to be given upon condition , and ability also to be given to perform that condition . b Arminians maintaine conditions preceding Gods very electing us to salvation . But ours maintaine conditions antecedent of actual salvation indeed , but consequent in regard of Election . The difference between our Divines and the Arminians about conditions being thus great , as hath beene shewed , I think it would have been fair dealing in you to have severed them , & not have crowded them together into one and the same refutation , as if they had mantained one and the same thing . Do you not think the friends of Pemble , Preston , Ames , Perkins , Ball , &c. would take it ill to have them refuted under the title of Arminians , and for maintaining Arminian Salvability ( a notion more abhorring to their spirits then to your owne , and which some of them have expresly written against ? ) yet do they all hold conditions in the Covenant . And you refute all such , who hold so , under that head and title . I challenge you to shew me any one of ours , that in pleading for conditions in the Covenant , doth in the least degree assert that conditionate Redemption or Arminian Salvability . Before you come to our Arguments , you tell us , that though you are against conditions , yet you hold that God hath his order and method in conferring of his benefits . And that in regard of this order one benefit may depend upon an other , &c. And that none are saved but such as do repent and believe . I was heartily glad to heare so much from you : for this is the maine I contend for , That God gives faith , and then salvation ; And that salvation depends on faith , and therfore in order of nature followes faith . And here I would argue ex concessis . Those benefits which according to that method and order of conferring that the Lord hath set down to himselfe , must goe before other , and on which others do depend ; Those ( I say ) are required in us , before the other which do depend on them , and follow them , can be obtained by us . But faith and repentance are benefits which according to this method of God are given before Salvation , and on which salvation doth depend . And therefore faith and repentance are actually required in us , before we can actually partake of Remission , Reconciliation . Justification , and other benefits and branches of Salvation purchased by Christ . It this were granted , that they are required , and that to the obtaining of Salvation ( which must needs be granted , the benefit of Salvation not only following them , but also depending on them as you confesse ) let them be required , as conditions , or as something else in Gods method and order ; I would not strive about termes . But I feate that you had here your reserve , and that you understand this priority of one benefit before an other , and this dependance of one benefit upon an other , either in reference to the manifestation of salvation , or the perfection of that , and not in reference to the beginning and being of them ; for so much some following passages hint out unto us ; of which we shall speak more when we come unto them . Not long after , you challenge Malice it selfe to shew , if it can , any one of your side that maintains salvation without repentance and faith . And here Sir , if I should produce some that doe assert it , should I not very prittely get me the odious name of malicious ? Wel , the Lord give us to hate the affect and fact as much as we doe the name . Truth is truth , and must be discovered . And I would to God there were not too many expressions vented both in Pulpits and Presses , too much tending this way . I find in Mr. Saltmarsh , Free grace . p. 102. Do not the promises belong to sinners as sinners ? And p. 104. The promises of Christ are held forth to sinners , as sinners ; not as repenting sinners , or humble sinners . p. 105. Whatever promise hath a condition in it , is ours in Christ , who only is the conditioned person for all promises . p. 84. So as we are to believe our repentance true in him , who hath repented for us . p. 126 All the conditions were on Christs part , none on ours . So p. 153 In the new Covenant God gives himself freely in Christ , undertaking all both with the Father and the Soule , nothing being required on mans part . Occasional word : That those Ministers who presse repentance and faith , do overheate the wine of the Gospel with conditions and qualifications , so the poore soules cannot taste it . So also in Doctor Crispe , I meet with many such like , or the same passages , as in his Christ alone exalted . vol. 1. p. 120. Christ belongs to sinners as sinners . p. 211. He receiveth sinners as sinners . p. 164. All the tie lies on Gods part to do every thing that is mentioned in the Covenant . p. 73. Hast thou but a mind to Christ , come and taste of the water of life freely ; there is nothing looked for from thee to take thy portion in this Christ. And in his second Volume , p. 420 We are justified without works not only without the concurrence of them to justification , but even without the being of them , and presence in the person to be justified . I might name many more , but these may suffice ; and I pray consider seriously whether from most , if not all those assertions doth not follow by natural and necessary consequence that monstrous conclusion now enquired of , viz. that wee may be saved without faith and repentance . Or , that faith and repantance are not necessary to salvation . Truly they speak so fully to this particular , in my apprehension , that all that I can see left you to save your selfe is , not to own these men for men of your side , which I should be heartily glad to heare . But consider one passage more frequent , as in these Authors , so in your owne Sermon ; This , That the Covenant of free grace is as free as that with Noah . Now concerning that we know , that men are partakers of the benefits promised in it , though they neither know nor believe any such Covenant . And if this of salvation be as free , wil it not thence follow , that men may be saved in it though they never believe it , or so much as know it ? To me it seems to follow without any constraint at all , as I shall labour to manifest by reducing it to an Argument , which I forme thus . By vertue of the Covenant with Noah , men are sure to be saved from an universal deluge , though they neither know nor believe such a Covenant . Therefore if the new Covenant be as free as that with Noah , a man may be saved in it , though he neither know it , nor can believe it : More of this particular you may read in Mr. Gataker against Saltmarsh , both in the former Treatise pag. 25. and in the Rejoynder pag. 11 , 13 , 88. where he clearly sheweth this very inference to be unconstrained , and makes good the charge now in debate against Mr. Saltmarsh : which Reverend Author , if you had any reference unto in that unsavory and noisome passage in your Sermon , I challenge malice it self , I must needs tell you , you were exceedingly to blame . Come wee to your Arguments , whereby you labour to prove , that no conditions are annexed to the purchases of Christs death in regard of application . Your first was from those places of Scripture , which declare the all sufficiency of Christs death , and the perfection of that in regard of impetration , as Heb. 10. 14 and 1 , 3 , 9 , 12 Unto which may be added your second head of Scriptures , viz. those which hold out unto us Gods acceptation of this price and acquiesence in it : as , This is my beloved Son , in whom I am well pleased , &c. Now these doe prove , that the price paid by Christ was perfect and sufficient ; yea , that it did fully impetrate , merit and purchase at the Fathers hands , the perfect and complete redemption of his Elect ; So that God lookes for nothing more to be done , or suffered towards the making up of the price , but rests fully satisfied with the sufferings of his Son. But they are of no force at all to take off any requisite necessary to the application of this purchase , be it qualification , condition , instruments or agent : for instance , If I should on your ground argue , Jesus Christ hath by himselfe purged our sins , and perfected &c. Therefore there is no neede the Gospel should be preached unto men , or that the spirit of grace be sent unto them to regenerate them ; I doubt not , but you would deny my inference , as well you might . So where you reason , Christ by dying hath paid a perfect price , which was also accepted of God the Father . Ergo , there are no conditions annexed to the purchase of his death ; you must give me leave to deny your Argument . And the reason is , because they are not annexed as any part of the price , to make up it complete : But only as the way and manner in which , the means and instrument by which , the terms and condition on which , and according to which God doth give , and man receives salvation purchased : Notwithstanding that , Christ hath thus perfectly purchased it , yet himself doth tell me , that unlesse I repent , I shall perish , Luk. 13. 3 , 5. And If I believe not , I shall be damned , Mark. 16. 16. As for that maxime you cited in the prosecution of your Argument , Impetratio est fundamentum applicationis , it makes for us , and not at all against us . For if it be fundamentum , the foundation , then it is not ipsa applicatio , the application it self , which is the monster your side doe hug and suckle . It makes indeed against Arminian salvability ; for which end it is used by our Authours , viz. to shew that though impetration and application may be distinguished , yet they cannot be separate or divided in their object . But that for whomsoever Christ doth impetrate , to him the benefits impetrated must be applyed ; for application ( say they ) is the end of impetration , and impetration the foundation of application . So that the Arminian doctrine of conditions to be performed by mans owne power , which make the issue of Christs death to be uncertaine and pendulous on mans free will , is wholly razed thereby : but our doctrine of conditions purchased for us by the death of Christ , and to be wrought in us by the Spirit of Christ are no way shaken . The purchases of Christs death may be surely applied to them for whom they are purchased , though they be applyed conditionally . Nor is that other maxime of any more strength , positâ causâ totali sequitur effectus , the totall cause being put , the effect followeth ; for if you speak of mans actual salvation , or the application of salvation unto man , you cannot say that Christs death is the total cause of it . The whole and sole meritorious cause it is ; But I hope Gods grace is the impulsive cause , Christs spirit the efficient cause , and faith the instrumental cause . And , bonum est ex integris causis , Good doth arise from all causes entire . Now though an instrument be the meanest of causes , yet is it necessary in the way of an instrument , nor can the effect be in act before it be used . Your third head contained such Scriptures as speake of Christ and salvation , as of a gift , a free gift : In pursuance of which you delivered , Christ is given , freely given of God. And if by grace , then not of works . And what can be laid on the creature that is not a worke . If but a Rose , not free . To be freely and by condition , is an absolute and flat contradiction . For answer , the Covenant with Adam , in a passage before , you aver to be conditional ; And in a passage following , you seeme to intimate , that it is free , by saying that he could not have merited , had he kept the condition . It seems then that to be free , and yet to be conditional , as flat a contradiction as it is , you your selfe have admitted in the Covenant with Adam . Did you seriously consider what you spake when you said , if but to pay a rose , the tenure is not free ? Certainly my Country men in Glocester-shire account that a very free tenure , nor think I them therein mistaken . And if some Gentlemen should bestow on you an hundred pound a year , on condition you should be more liberal to the poor to the expence , not of a rose or two , or a penny or two , but ( it may be ) ten or twenty pound a yeare , which unlesse you constantly exhibite , you were to lose the principal . If for all this condition you should not say that this were a free gift , I should account you fowly unthankful . If my memory faile not , our ancient godly Divines use those similitudes of a Rose or pepper corne , to set out the condition , not of faith , but of good works , which they maintaine to be required under the Gospel as a consequent condition . By which expression of theirs , they do , ( as you say ) destroy the freenesse of grace . But your bare saying so doth not prove it . The truth is , the Arminians and Papists were more beholding to you for some passages in your Sermons , then our ancient godly Protestant Divines . But come wee to your Argument , which if not taken out of Doctor Crispe , is yet certainly the same with his , vol. 1. p. 64. & p. 179. By gift , and on condition , is a flat contradiction . But take heed that you and the Doctor make not the Scriptures to speake absolute and flat contradiction , which say , wee are saved by grace through faith . Eph. 2. 8. And therefore it is of faith , that it might be by grace . Rom. 4. 16. And being justified freely by his grace through faith in his blood . Rom. 3. 23 , 24. And in the very place cited by you and the Doctor , Rom 11. 6. If by grace , then it is no more of works , otherwise grace is no more grace . But if it be by works , it is no more of grace , otherwise works are no more works ; where it followes , what then ? Israel hath not obtained what he seeketh for . And if you ask , wherefore ? the Apostle will tell you Rom. 9 32. Because they sought it not by faith , but as it were by the works of the law . So likewise , Where is boasting then ? it is excluded . By what Law ? of works ? Nay , but by the law of faith . Rom 3. 27. And to him that worketh not but believeth , Rom. 4. 5. The Scriptures joyn faith and free grace ; yea they tell us , that freenesse of grace is upheld by that requisite or condition of faith . But you call it a flat contradiction . The Scriptures oppose faith and works . But you say , What can be laid upon the creature , that is not a work ? You would beare men in hand that we teach contradictions . But I am sure these passages of yours contradict the Scripture . Again , did not Christ lay repentance and faith upon the creature , when he said , repent and believe the Gospel ? Matth 4. 17. Mark 1. 15. yea , doth he not lay it on them upon paine of damnation , when he doubles it Luke 13. 35. except ye repent ye shall perish ? Did not the Apostles lay something on the creature , when they thus answered their troubled converts , who in anguish of spirit came with these queries to them , men and brethren what shal we doe ? Acts ● . 37. And Sirs , what shall I do to be saved ? ch . 16. 20. I say , when they thus answered them , repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ , and be converted ; Did they not require something of them , and lay something on them ? And did Christ or his Apostles ( think you ) preach any thing contradictory to free grace , or free gift ? I hope , whatever contradictions you pinne on our Sermons , you will take heed what you fasten on the sayings of Christ and his Apostles , whose doctrine we must take leave to believe and follow , how contradictory soever it be deemed in the world . Do not say here , that Christ did not require them , nor his Disciples presse them , as conditions , or as a worke ( which is the Doctors evasion ) for you your selfe know that we disclaime faith as a worke , as much as you . Wee maintaine not any worthinesse , excellency or merit in faith . I desire you to shew me if you can , in any of ours , that faith doth justifie as a work done by us or for any worthinesse or excellency that is in it . I am sure that I can shew you the contrary , and you may also see it if you be pleased to peruse Mr. Gatakers rejoynder to Saltmarsh . p. 51. 53. This is that we maintaine , that faith is so required of God , that if we have it , we shall have salvation ; and if we have it not , we cannot have salvation , and that not only in knowledge , but in the being of it : not only the evidence , declaration , and manifestation of that ( which is the Doctors opinion . p. 168. and I feare is also yours ) but not the receipt , benefit , or being of it , and that because it is required to the very obtaining of it , not in any meritorious , but in an instrumentall way . Now do not the Apostles averre as much when they answer this quaerie , what shall I do to be saved ? thus , repent and believe &c. do they not in these answers lay repentance and faith on the creature as things required of God in them that would be saved , and that towards the obtaining of their salvation , not the evidencing or manifesting it only to themselves . And when the Apostle saith , the Jewes came short of righteousnesse which the Gentiles attained unto , because they sought it not by faith as the Gentiles did Rom. 9. 31. Doth he speak of the manifesto of Righteousnesse , and not rather of righteousnesse and justification it selfe , the being of it ? Certainly the Jewes fel short , not only of the assurance , but of the essence and being of righteousnesse , and that because they sought it not by faith . So that faith is required of God from the creature so , and laid on the creature so , that by it the creature must seek everlasting righteousnesse , the being of it , or he shall for ever goe without it . But for the thing it selfe , that a gift may be free , and yet conditional , is no such contradictory proposition , but that both parts may be true , well stand together , and uphold rather then destroy each other ; you might have seen in our Authors , if you had beene pleased to look in to them , or to have called to mind what I perswade my self you have formerly read in them . c Camero would have informed you that all conditions do not destroy free grace , Sed eae quae possunt habere rationem meriti , but only such as are meritorious . And Doctor d Prideaux , That to a meritorious worke , foure things are required , which are all of them wating in our conditions . First , it must wholly and entirely proceede from the undertaker . The person that will merit , must doe it of himselfe , out of his owne strength and power : So was the condition of works to have been performed . Man had strength conveyed to him in created nature , and was to have kept the condition by this his strength . But thus it is not in the conditions of the Gospel : we receive strength from grace , to performe the conditions of grace . God who requires them of us , works them in us ; he gives to repent , he gives us to believe : which I think is the Crowne of free grace , that gives us a crowne upon our bare receiving it , and gives us also withall a hand to take it . Secondly , It must be a mans owne , no way due or belonging to the person of whom we me merit Suppose a tenant be three or foure years rent behind with his Landlord , to the value ( it may be ) of one hundred pound , or two hundred pound ; and having nothing to pay , should be freely forgiven by his Landlord , only on this condition , that he carefully pay his rent for time to come . Shall this person say , the gift was not free because upon this condition ? Why the condition is due unto the Landlord , whether he forgive what is past or no , and therefore , can no way detract from the freenesse of the gift . So is our faith due , our repentance is due ( the fall , and the recovery by Christ supposed ) to God from us , whether he forgive and justifie upon them or no. And therefore the frenesse of the gift of righteousnesse is no way impaired by the requirement of them . When we have done all wee are commanded , we must say we are unprofitable servants , Luk. 17. 10. unprofitable saith e Chamier to our selves , we have not earned so much as thanks for our selves ; and that because we have done no more then what 's our duty . f Opposita sunt solvere debitum et mereri : To pay or discharge a debt , and to merit or deserve , are opposite . Thirdly , It must be some way profitable or advantageous to the person of whom we merit . Now this also failes : for , can a man be profitable to God , as a wise man is profitable to himselfe ? Is it any gaine or pleasure to him , that thou makest thy waies perfect ? Job 22. 2. & 35. 4 , 5. What profit is it to the Sunne , that wee receive its light into our houses ? or to the spring , that we drinke of its water ? God is no way indamaged by our impenitency , nor advantaged by our returne in to him ; All the emolument accrues to us our selves . And therefore though he require our return unto him , and beliefe on him , if we will be saved by him , yet is his gift of salvation neverthelesse free , because he is no way the gainer by the things required Nay , the conditions required by him are matter of further charge and expence unto him , he being the worker and donor of them , as was shewed in the first particular . Suppose that some rich person should adopt a poore mans child to be his heire , upon condition that the child be sent home unto him , to live with him , and to be trained and bred up in learning by him . Shall the young man say , it is not free ? because it is upon condition , he leaves his fathers cottage for it , he goes to school for it & c ? Alas , what profit are either of these to his forster father ? Nay , rather they are matter of further charge to him ; For by reason of these , he is at cost for his food , apparel , schooling , and other necessaries to his breeding and education : So when the Lord who chuseth amongst his enemies those whom he adopts to be heirs of salvation , doth require of them , that they repent of their sin , beleeve on his Sonne , leave off all their vaine wayes , and learne to be like himself who is their father : These heires of grace cannot say that their inheritance is not freely given , because it is given on these termes and conditions : for the things required are no way profitable to God who doth require them ; but rather matter of further cost and charge unto him , who sends his word , his messengers , his graces , his spirit for the working of them . 4. It must be some way proportionable to the reward we expect for it , which also failes in our conditions ; for what proportion is there between our repentance and remission , between our faith and justification . As the Apostle , our light afflictions , which are but for a moment , work forth unto us an exceeding , and eternal weight of glory . So may we also say of our repentance and faith . If the Landlord should say to his Tenant ( one hundred or two hundred pound indebted to him ) These summes you owe , and I do not see where you have a penny to pay , I might use extremity towards you , cast you into prison , and there let you rot ; but I will not deale so severely with you . Do but make an ingenuous acknowledgment of what you owe , and that you will be beholding to me , and I will freely remit it . Shall this person say , he was not freely forgiven , because it was on this condition , his acknowledgment ? Alas , what proportion is there betweene the debt and the acknowledgment ? Thus God seemes to speak to us in the matter of repentance . h Only acknowledg thine iniquities . The summe of all is , That a man gives freely , which he gives on condition , when withal he gives ability to perform the condition ; else salvation given for , and through Christ would not be free . But such are the conditions we pleade for , as our duties , so Gods gifts and graces : and therefore the gift of salvation , notwithstanding them , is free . Againe , That we give on condition , the condition being the parties duty to whom we give , is free , else the portions that parents give dutiful children would not be free gift . But such are the conditions maintained by us ; such as we owe of duty to God , whether he give or no ; he giveth therefore freely , though he require them . 3. That we give on conditions , the conditions being no way beneficial to us who give , no way equivalent to the thing we give , nor any way causal of our giving , we give most freely . But such also are the conditions defended by us , as hath beene made apparent , they no way benefit the Lord at all , they are infinitely disproportionable to the gift of salvation he bestowes , nor do they any way move him to bestow salvation ; but rather his will and purpose to bestow salvation , moves him to bestow them , that by receipt of them , his people might be fitted for the salvation he intends them . And therefore notwithstanding that they are required , the gift of salvation is most free . Thus have we done with your Argument , from the freenesse of grace ( which , that it may well stand with our conditions , I hope is well cleared ) as also with your Arguments taken from scripture . We come now to those you fetch from Reason The first of which was taken from the intent of Christ in dying , which the Scriptures hold out to be the salvation of those for whom he died . Now ( say you ) if he died conditionally , it will follow that he willed not their salvation at all , but their damnation , as much or more then their salvation ; for he wills their salvation if they believe , otherwise their damnation : and it is natural to them not to believe . This and all that followes in the Argument , may make against the Arminians , who hold that Christ hath purchased salvation for us , but not faith , and that he died for us conditionally ( i. e. ) that we should be saved if we did believe but did no way procure for us , that we should believe ; and accordingly it is used by our Authors , though in other terms , to destroy the Arminians conditionality ; as you may see in i Owen . But conditional redemption , in which the conditions are purchased , as wel as the salvation ( which is that we maintain ) it no way oppugneth . Put case an outlandish man should procure for his Sonne some inheritance in our Country to be enjoyed by him upon his infranchisement ; you cannot say he intended his Sons non-enjoyment of it as much as enjoyment , because of the condition of his Infranchisement , if that the Infranchisement be procured by the father as wel as the inheritance . The purchasers intent ( I hope is ) ful and firme . Notwithstanding the conditionality of the purchase , when the condition is purchased , as well as the thing . So when we maintaine that Christ hath procured salvation for us , to be enjoyed conditionally , if wee doe believe . You cannot inferre thence , that he intended our damnation as much as salvation , because we have no power to believe ; for wee maintaine also , that Christ hath purchased for us , that wee shall believe . Sir , Arminians say , That Christ died for us that we might be saved if wee doe believe ; k we , that Christ died for us , that we should believe , and believing , have life through his name . Dare you say that Christ died for any so absolutely , as that they should be saved whether they did believe or no ? I hope you will not , though your parallelling the new Covenant with that with Noah doth naturally yeild such an inference , as hath already beene shewed . Your second Argument was the same with one you used in your former sermons , where you asserted the absolutenesse of the new Covenant , viz. That this conditionality infers a liberty of will. But Sir , that those who plead for conditions are no way maintainers or abettors of free will , their writings sufficiently declare . l You make men believe that we preach not repentance as the grace of God by his Spirit , wrought in our hearts in and for Christ , which is most untrue ; and who of us denies faith to be the gift of God , or that God out of his love to us in Christ , freely worketh it in us , that therby we may be enabled to receive Christ . That we are not only halfe dead , but quite dead , and can do nothing that is good until the spirit quicken us ; cannot goe to Christ til God the Father draweth us : cannot believe on Christ nor repent of sin until the Lord give it unto us , and enable us thereto , is a doctrine I have long agoe learned from their Sermons , and often meete with in their writings . And as for the inference , he which chargeth the Patronage of free will on that kind of preaching , that holds out life and salvation upon condition of faith and repentance , let him looke to it how he will quit Christ and his Apostles from that charge , whose Sermons are full of counsels , commands and calls , that require men to repent and believe , if ever they would be saved . Sir , conditions to be performed by us of our owne strength and power , which the Arminians maintaine , argue a power in mans will indeede . But conditions purchased by Christ for us , and to be wrought by his Spirit in us , which we maintain ; Inferre no power of free wil at all . Your third Argument was taken from election . That from this conditional redemption would follow , that men are elected but conditionally , so that Gods election should be undetermined and uneffectual , and the will of God should be made subordinate to the will of the creature . Sir , God may be said to elect conditionally two wayes . 1. So as that the condition be considered as anteceding his election , moving him to will salvation to such a person . This conditionality indeed subordinates the will of the Creator to the creature , and causeth election to be undetermined and ineffectual . But such kind of conditions , we oppugne as Arminian . Or 2. so , as that the condition preceede indeed the actual enjoyment of the benefits to which men are elected , but followes election it self . And this consideration of conditions of election we propugne , as no way evacuating either the efficacy or determinatenesse of Gods election , nor yet in any wise subjecting the wil of God to the will of man therein . Hear what Dr. Ames saith to this very thing . m It never was denied by our Divines , that faith was maintained as a condition antecedent indeed to salvation , but consequent unto , or following election it self ; ( i. e. ) but hath been constantly religiously maintained . No Sir , our doctrine concerning conditions , doth no way destroy the certainty of election . But on the contrary , the doctrine of election doth confirme this our Tenent of Conditional Redemption . For so as God from all eternity purposed salvation unto us , and elected us thereto : So did Christ purchase it , and so is it actually to be applied . But God n hath from the beginning chosen us to salvation through sanctification of the spirit , and beliefe of the truth . And heretofore Christ did purchase it to be obtained that way , and that way it is actually to be enjoyed . So that till we be brought over , to the beliefe of the truth and some degree of Sanctification ; we cannot be said actually to partake of any part of the salvation purposed or purchased . That God elects for faith foreseene , we uterly deny ; but that he electeth through or by it , i.e. salvation to be obtained through or by it , we religiously maintain . Your fourth Argument runnes thus , If the purchases of Christs death have any condition annexed to them in regard of application , then these conditions share with Christ in the businesse of salvation . It is the same with another of your Arguments used in your former lectures , and neere of kinne to that of Doctor Crispe , vol. 1. p. 168. Then Christ justifieth not alone . Is faith Christ himselfe ? if not , then Christ must have a partner to justifie . But the sequel both in yours and the Doctors Argument is notoriously false ; and that because conditions are not required in the same way of causality that Christs righteousness is . For that is required as a meritorious cause , purchasing and procuring mans peace ; faith is an instrument apprehending it , and Christ the cause of it ; repentance as a way leading to it , or qualification fitting a person for it . Now when an effect depends on divers causes of a different kind , the necessity of the one , argues not the insufficiency of the other ; but the one may be sufficient in its kind , though the other be required . The wounded person must apply the plaister to the wound , if he wil have it heale him . The diseased person must drink the potion , must travel to the bath , and bathe himselfe therein , if he will have either the potion to purge him , or the bath to cure him : Yet would it be great weaknesse in either of these , to say , that the plaister , the potion , the bath were not sufficient , because they were required to goe unto the one , to take and apply the other ; for their taking , going , drinking , applying , are not required in the same sanatory and medicinal way as the bath , the plaister , or the portion are ; but only in an instrumental way , to bring these home to him , that so they might worke upon him . So , nor is my repentance and faith required in any satisfactory or meritorious way , to satisfie Gods justice together with Christ , or merit remission for me ; no , Christ doth that alone , they are only required to fit me for Christ , and bring me to Christ . Did we ascribe any merit or worthinesse to our conditions , then you might say indeed that we made them partners with Christ ; but we abhorre this as much as you . Faith , saith Mr. o Gataker , affords not the least mite towards the making up of that price , wherewith our debt is to be discharged . That this answer would be made unto your Argument , you your selfe foresaw ; and therefore to Anticipate it . You say , — But some distinguish betweene Conditions , and meritorious Conditions , &c. Unto which you reply , That this is a most weake evasion , for Papists themselves ascribe no merit to the preparations they plead for ; and cite for it Conc. Trid. Sess . 6. c. 8. And here Sir , is a second calumnie . For as before you ranked us with Arminians , so here you would insinuate that we joyne hands with Papists in maintaining of this conditional redemption . But as I hope I have vindicated it from the charge of Arminianisme ; so I doubt not also to cleare it from this of Papisme . Is it enough , my good friend , to make a thing evil , to say that Papists hold so ? Why did you cite Aestius and Lessius , both Papists , among the Champions of your opinion ? Papists agree with us , and wee with them in many things . Nor call we that Popish where they are sound , and agree with us , but that only wherein they being erroneous we dissent from them , and protest against them . Now whether or no Papists maintaine any meritoriousnesse in the preparations they defend , sure I am , that Protestant Authors chiefly oppose this meritoriousnesse of them , as I shall prove unto you . First then , consider that what Chemnitius replie , to that very place and passage of the Counsel that you cite , If I have not mist your quotation . His words are these . p If therefore this were the minde and judgment of the Synod , that it would simply shew that manner and order which God doth use according to the Doctrine of the Scripture , when he intends to bring men to justification ; and if they would not attribute those things which the Scripture teacheth do go before it , to the strength of free will , but to the grace of God , and operation of his Holy Spirit , nor place any merit or worth in those preparations for which wee may be justified ; we might easily be agreed concerning the word preparation , rightly understood according to the Scripture . Out of which of Chemnitius , I observe three things . ( 1 ) That however in that Session they did daube over the matter , yet they did hold a dignity , worth , and merit of congruity to be in these preparations , which the same Chemnitius doth afterwards prove at large , spending three or foure leaves therein . ( 2 ) That Chemnitius held something , some worke wrought by the Spirit in man to precede his justification , or his reception of justification ; for in the following paragraph , thus he speaks . q It is therefore false , which in the ninth Canon they attribute to us , as if we taught that not any motion of the will given by God , and excited by him , doth goe before our receiving of justification : for we doe altogether teach that repentance and contrition doe goe before . Wee doe not say , that they goe before as a merit , which by its worth doth cooperate to the obtaining of justification ; but as the sense of sicknesse or griefe of a wound , is not any merit of the cure , but doth raise and stirre up to desire , seeke out and welcome the Physician . For the whole hath no neede of the Phsitian , but they that are sick , as Christ saith . And in this sense , those things ( as the Scripture saith ) do go before . 3. That he could easily have agreed with those Tridentine Fathers about preparations ( the word preparation being rightly understood , and according to Scripture expressions ; ) if they would not have ascribed them to the strength of free wil , nor have put the worth and merit of justification upon them . By this ( I think ) it is plaine , that they were meritorious preparations that Chemnitius did oppose in his writings against the Papists . And truly I wonder , that you should cavil at that distinction I gave between a condition and a meritorious cause : And more , that , you should say that Papists ascribe no merit to conditions , and preparations . You know the question concerning the conditional promises of the Gospel is handled under that concerning the necessity of works , where our Writers grant a necessity of presence , but not of efficiencie , which Bellarmine contends for . Now I pray , what doe they understand by that efficiency , but a meritorious efficiency ? or , what other then that can be ascribed unto works ? yea , that our Authours understand merit by that efficiency , they deny . Adde to Chemnitius , Chamier , and consider two passages in him . r But the Gospel doth not promise salvation without any condition of observing the law , nor did ever any of ours teach that : so that he do not take the word condition for merit . And in ch . 5. Sect. 11. For the condition of faith is not antecedent , but consequent , because there is no merit of faith considered , or faith is not the cause of salvation . To these joyne Doctor Ames , who saith . ſ We doe not deny that good works have any relation to salvation ; for they have the relation of an adjunct consequent , and of the effect to salvation obtained ( as they speake ; ) and of an adjunct antecedent , and disposing to salvation to be obtained ; and also of an Argument confirming our assurance and hope of salvation : But we deny that any works of ours can be a meritorious cause of justification and salvation . And in the Chapter before , s Promises with a condition of obedience as the causes of that right which we have to the thing promised , are proper to the law ; but promises with condition of obedience , as of the adjunct or effect of the thing promised , or the donation of it , have place in the most bountifull kingdome of grace , where there is no place found for our merits . Bishop Davenant shall be the next , who averring repentance , faith and love to be necessary to justification , adds by way of explication , and in opposition to the Popish sense of necessity , t These and the like inward works of the heart are necessary to all that are justified : not because they conteine in themselves that efficacy or merit of justification ; but because according to Gods ordination either they are required as conditions precedaneous to , or concurrent with justification , as to repent , and to believe ; or else as effects necessarily flowing from justifying faith , as to love God , to love our neighbour . And in his next Chapter , stating this question , whether good works may be said to be necessary to justification and salvation ? he sets downe in his first and second conclusions , that in controversies with Papists , and Sermons to vulgar people , wee should not use such expressions without due explication of them , and that because both Papists and people wil be ready to understand them necessarily as meritorious causes of salvation . Shewing by example of the Ancient Fathers how careful they have beene to forbeare some forms of speech , by reason of the corrupt sense of hereticks : to which purpose he alledgeth that of Hierom ; that which may well be spoken , is not sometimes to be spoken by reason of the Ambiguity . Neverthelesse in his fifth , sixth and seventh Conclusions he maintains , that they are necessary thereto , though not as meritorious causes , yet as previous and concurrent conditions . Let Mr. Perkins be the first wee name for this particular ; who in his Reformed Catholick , besides the head of Merit , ( which wholly makes for us , and shewes sufficiently the Papists to be Patrons of merit ) in that of Repentance , speaking of the differences between us and Papists , therein saith , The fourth abuse is touching the effect and efficacy of Repentance ; for they make it a meritorious cause of remission of sin , and of life everlasting , flat against the Word of God. And a little after : They ascribe to their contrition the merit of congruity , which cannot stand with the sufficient merit of Christ . We for our parts hold , that God requires contrition at our hands , not to merit remission of sins , but that we may acknowledge our owne unworthinesse , be humbled in the fight of God , and distrust all our own merits ; and further , that we may make more account of the benefit of Christ , wherby we are received into the favour of God , and more carefully shun sin for time to come . But we acknowledge no contrition at all to be meritorious save that of Christ . I might adde to these , learned u Camero , and repeate that which I cited out of him before , it being the very distinction which you call a most weake evasion ; and the defence of which , we are now upon . As also renowned v Pemble , who spends a whole Chapter in refuting that opinion of Bellarmine , and the Romanists ; viz. That faith justifies us as an efficient and meritorious cause obtaining , deserving , and in its kinde beginning justification . But I shall content my self with the recitall of two more , who handle the very Question now in controversie , Whether the Promises of the Gospel be absolute or conditional ? And determine that they are absolute , not conditionall . The first of these is Broachman , who saith , w It is not controverted , Whether the promises of the Gospel , that they may be fruitfull and saving , do require faith : Neither is it called into controversie , Whether the promises of the Gospel be so free and absolute , that they discharge a man from a serious sorrow for sins , and from all study of good works ? For he must be an infant in Scripture , that is not acquainted with these assertions of the holy Spirit . But the true state of the question is , whether the Gospel for any our worth , intention , work , merit , or any disposition in us , doth promise to us grace , mercy , remission of sinnes and eternal life ; or rather for and through Jesus Christ apprehended by faith . And againe , in answer to Bellarmines fifth objection , which was , that the promises of the Gospel doe alwayes require the condition of Faith : Thus hee saith ; which wee grant . And further averrs , that this condition of faith will stand with his Assertion of absolute promises : For saith he , We warned you in the beginning , that it is not controverted , Whether the promises of the Gospel doe require faith , which wee willingly grant : x But whether in the free remission of sins , the condition of Faith be required as any work of ours , or certain disposition in us ; to which , as to an efficient , helping , or cooperating cause , the free remission of sins may be ascribed ; which we do roundly deny . The other is Mr. y Burges , who asserts the same out of Broachman , as I conceive . By these Citations I hope it will more then sufficiently appear to an eye not strangely possest with prejudice , 1. That the distinction between a Condition and a meritorious Cause , is no slender and weak Evasion , but a maine and fundamental Distinction in this Controversie , such as on which the very hinges of the Controversie doth turn . 2. That your saying . That Papist ascribe not any meritoriousnesse to conditions , &c. is most false , if there be any truth in these Protestants collections ; yea , that it doth asperse these reverend Protestant Authours fore-named , who oppose the Papist in the very particular . 3. That those of our Divines who maintain conditional promises in the Covenant , whilst withal they exclude all claim of dignity , worth , merit , or any such causality from these conditions , do not joyne with Papists , as you would make the people believe , but with Protestants against Papists ; and differ not one hairs breadth from those who aver the Covenant to be absolute , not conditional : for by the Conditions which they deny , they understand meritorious Conditions . 4. That in rejecting this distinction between a Condition and a meritorious Cause , and asserting the Covenant to be without , not only meritorious conditions , but all other also : you oppose all Orthodox Divines that ever I met with , not only those that hold the Covenant to be conditional , but those also who in terminis aver the absoluteness of it , ( for by the conditions they reject , they understand meritorious ones , as hath been shewed ) and joyn with Mr. Saltmarsh , Dr. Crisp , and such other whom the Othodox , not out of malice , but for distinction sake , and for the due desert of some of their Tenents do call Antinomians . But let us see what further strength you bring to the battering of this distinction : for your charge of Popery will not hold . You add therefore farther ; Did Adams doing merit life ? None will say it . Yet the Grace of God is more shewed in the latter then in the first Covenant . Therefore in it no conditions at all . Sir , The Apostle saith , To him that worketh the reward is reckoned , not of grace , but of debt , Rom. 4. 4. I know some hold the Covenant with Adam , wherein works were injoyned , to be a Covenant of Grace . I have heard Mr. Symonds of Holland deliver that in a Sermon at Rederith , and thereupon divide the Covenant of Grace into the Covenant of Works , and the Covenant of Faith. Certainly , had Adam kept the condition of the first Covenant , he had done no more then his Duty ; nor had he profited God at all ; besides , there would have been small or no proportion between that his Work and the reward ; all which are required to merit proper . So that in some sense that may be called a Covenant of Grace . Neverthelesse in the latter Covenant of Faith , the grace of God is so far more fully , richly , and gloriously manifested , then in that of Works , as that it obtaineth the title of the Covenant of Grace . The Apostle saith , it was by Faith , that it might be by Grace , Rom. 4. 16. And the Scripture being so plain for it , I ought to believe it , though I could not make it out to others , wherein it was freer , nor yet apprehend it my self . But my good friend , the businesse is not so difficult but that it may be , and hath been already dispatch'd by some of our side , and the freenesse of the latter above the former , notwithstanding the conditionality of both , at large discovered . And that not by excluding faith , or the condition of faith from the latter ( as you would have it ) for that would interfere with that of the Apostle now cited , By Faith , that it might be of Grace ; where Faith is taken in , not left out to make out the freenesse . Nor yet only because faith is given of God , and so ability to keep the latter Covenant is given , which is something . For though that strength Adam had to keep the first Covenant was freely bestowed on him by God in his Creation , yet when God was pleased to enter into a Covenant with him , he had it in him , and was to work in his own strength and power . Whereas in the New Covenant God finds man in an impotent , weak , and dead condition , and graciously promiseth to work in him ability to do what he requireth : This ( I say ) is something that serves to shew the freenesse of Divine Grace in the new Covenant ; for the Apostle saith expresly , Ephes . 2. 8. We are saved by Grace through faith , and that not of our selves , it is the gift of God ; where the giving of the thing required , to wit , Faith , is introduced by the Apostle to shew the freeness of Grace . But the superabundancy of Grace in the latter Covenant appears mostly in this , that in the former , the matter of mans Justification had been something of his own , his own exact and perfect obedience to the Law of God ; but in the latter , the matter of it is an others , the perfect Righteousness of Christ . In the one , man runs into himselfe for the price of his life and happiness : But in the other , faith carries him out of himself unto another , the Lord Jesus Christ for all . In the one , the condition it self and the keeping of it , was to have been the matter of mans Righteousness , the ground of his Justification . In the other , it is only the Instrument and Mean. In the one , the condition it self ( Works ) procured life , in and of themselves , without any reference to any other ; but in the other , Faith is looked on , not as a Work , but as an Instrument ; nor doth it save for any excellency , worth , or vertue that is in it ; but only because it layes hold on Christ . I cannot better expresse my self then in Mr. Gatakers words , Rejoynder . p. 46 , 47. In the one , Works are considered , as in themselves performed by the Parties to be justified and live . In the other , Faith is considered and required , not as a work barely done by us , but us an Instrument whereby Christ is apprehended , in whom is found , and by whom that is done , whereby Gods Justice is satisfied , and life eternal meritoriously procured for us ; so that they differ as much as these two Propositions . 1. Pay your debt of a thousand pounds and be free . 2. Rely on such a friends satisfaction made for it , and be as free as if you had made full payment and satisfaction your self . All this and more you may find in that reverend Divine , your contempt of whom , and all other not of your way , sads the hearts of your friends , and makes them fear that which they are loath to suspect concerning you . You proceed , and tell us that though it be not meritorious , yet if it be Antecedent , it must be Effective ; For an Antecedent condition is effective . Sir , By your own maintaining faith to be an instrument in the work of our salvation ( which I think is more then a condition , though no more I believe then truth ) you must of necessity grant it both a precedency and efficiency therein ; for instruments are alwayes reckoned to the efficient cause , and in order of nature precede the effect . And thus I conceive that faith is effective in the work of our salvation , as an instrument receiving Christ , not as a condition . Conditions are not effective , but instruments are . As for that of z Chamier , that a condition ▪ Antecedent is effective ; I conceive he means meritorious , the passage cited out of him already leading me to that conjecture : For ( saith he ) the a Condition of faith is not Antecedent , but consequent , because no merit of faith is considered , or faith is not the Cause of Salvation . Now that Conditions are meritorious , yea or so much as impulsive , is altogether denied by the Assertors of conditions , who allow no causality at all to them . It rests on you to prove that the Antecedency of a condition doth infer its causality : For though Chamier aver it , yet I see no ground for that his assertion , especially in such conditions , as those we maintain in the New Covenant . Your first Argument runs thus : If Conditions be annexed , &c. Then no man can be sure of the benefits purchased whiles he lives ; for the conditions must be performed , &c. To which we may add two Arguments of your former Sermons , the first the very same with this : If salvation were on condition , then none could be sure of salvation , for none can be sure to hold out in performance of the Condition . The other , If any condition be required , then none can be saved , for none can perform the condition . Adam could not abstain from one tree when he was in the state of Innocency . Much lesse . — First , Sir , your instance of Adam , we conceive it unsound . That he did not abstain , we finde by woful experience ; but that he could not , we deny . Recepit posse si vellet , non autem velle ut posset , saith a Father . Adam had power to have abstained if he would , only his will was not confirmed in good ; whereupon it came to passe that he freely fell . Secondly , Your weapon may be turned against your self : For whereas you hold , That none are saved but such as believe , it may be objected unto you out of your own Argument , Then none can be saved , for none can believe ; or , Then none can be sure of Salvation , because none can bee sure to hold out in believing . Thirdly , It seemes to me directly to crosse the Apostle , who tells us , That it was of faith , that the Promise might be sure to all the Seed , Rom. 4. 16. Fourthly , Whereas you say , That if Conditions be required , then none can be sure , because none can bee sure to hold out ; Do you not seem to intimate that salvation is sure to the Elect , whether they hold out in the faith or not ? which is the Monster Arminians would father upon our Tenents . For answer therefore to your Argument , the main of it may wound an Arminian , who holds falling from grace : but as for those who hold no such uncomfortable Doctrine , it no way toucheth them . We say with David , 2 Sam. 23. 5. Although my house be not so with God , yet he hath made with me an everlasting Covenant ordered in all things and sure . For he hath promised to circumcise our hearts , to write his Lawes in our hearts , to give us a new heart , and then through grace , after our recovery , we may do that which in our sick , dead , and corrupt estate we could not do ; namely , keep the condition in an Evangelical way , wherein though exact perfectnesse be required , yet is repentance admitted , and sincerity accepted . Again , he hath promised to put his fear in our hearts , that we may not depart from him , Jer. 32. 40. And we are confident that he who hath begun a good work in us , will perform it to the day of Christ , Phil. 1. 6. Qui operatur ut accedamus , idem operatur ne discedamus . We answer therefore the main of your Argument , even as wee answer the Arminians , That though in regard of our own strength , which is weak , we may fear , yet in regard of Gods manutenency we are sure . Who will keep us , not without , but by and through the Means he hath appointed us , even faith ; by which , as he brings us into a state of Salvation , so through the same he will keep us by his Almighty power unto salvation , 1 Pet. 1. 5. We are as sure of perseverance in observation of the condition as of Salvation ; holding both of God by like tenure of free promise . Salvation , you see then , may be obteined , notwithstanding the conditions required , because God hath promised to give ability to perform them , and to persevere in the performance of them . This you foresaw would be replied , and therefore anticipate it by saying , But God hath promised to give faith . To which you rejoyne , I demand , Whether that Promise be absolute or conditional ? And anon , There is no reason why one Promise should be more absolute then another . But 1. Sir , Whether absolute or conditional , a Promise it is , and such as doth assure the soul of the condition on which salvation is given . So that Salvation is sure , notwithstanding the conditionality of the Covenant , and the sinewes of your Argument are cut in two . 2. For your Quaerie , Whether it be conditional or absolute ? I conceive it absolute . Christ procured Salvation for us to be bestowed conditionally , if we do believe ; but faith it self hath he absolutely procured without prescribing of any condition ; so that it is equivalent to an absolute purchase in respect of the event and issue . Owen Universal Redemp . l. 3. c. 1. & 2. For my part , I cannot imagine how any condition ( I mean Antecedent condition , for a Consequent condition they may admit of ) can be annexed to those Promises , I will write my Lawes in their hearts , and I will put my fear into their hearts , and I will take the stony heart out of their bodies . &c. unlesse free wil be granted . And therefore I conceive those promises to be absolute in regard of Antecedent conditions . Now whereas you say , There is no reason why one Promise should be more absolute then another ; the will of the Covenant Maker to have it so , is it self a sufficient Reason . Is it not the will of God to give Christ absolutely , & then salvation for Christs sake to them that do believe in him ? Shall I say here , That there is no reason why one gift should be more absolute then another ? He who worketh all things according to the counsel of his own will , hath infinite reason both for his will and working . In the mean while , Sir , your Reason from the certainty of Salvation , is ( I think ) sufficiently discovered to have nothing of force against Protestant conditional Redemption . Your last Argument was taken from the Analogy or Resemblance betwixt Christ and Adam ; As by the one , sin is conveyed ; so by the other Righteousnesse : but by the one sin and death are conveyed without Condition ; Ergo. I doubt not Sir , but that you will remember the old rules ; viz. 1. That similitudes run not on all four . 2. Nor are Argumentative . I might as well argue hence , That all mankind are redeemed by Christ , because they were all destroyed by Adam : Or that all were not corrupted by Adam , as Peter Martyr on the place tels me , Ambrose and Origen did hence hold , because all are not repaired by Christ : Or with Bellarmine , That Adam conveyed inherent sin to his posterity whereby they perish , and therefore the Righteousnesse of Christ conveyed for our recovery must be inherent . We should many wayes clip the truth of God , if we should every way make these lines run parallel . Hear Peter Martyr to the very point , This Analogy holds true only in the general : but in respect of the particular , and the kinds , there is great difference . Adam conveyes sin by Propagation to his Posterity : But Christ conveyed Righteousness by faith . After this you had a passage concerning actual Righteousnesse and actual Reconciliation , to this purpose : Vnlesse men will grant that Christ purchased a salvability , the salvation purchased must be actual ; for Inter actum & potentiam non datur medium . Sir , I know none of ours that deny , that Christ purchased actual salvation for those for whom he dyed ; i.e. That in time they should be actually saved in that way and method agreed on between the Father and the Son. The thing we deny is , That the salvation purchased , is actually theirs for whom its purchased before they come actually to believe . You must give us leave to distinguish between the Purchase and the Possession : the Grant or Donation of a Benefit , and the actual exhibition and reception of it . The child may have an Inheritance purchased for him , and bequeathed to him before he is born , but he must be born before he can enjoy it . Abraham had the grant and Donation of Canaan , long before his had the actual possession of it . Hear we Dr. Ames in this particular ; c All and each have grace and salvation given , though they have not the possession of the thing given before faith . Now unto these Arguments let us add one or two more out of your former Sermons about the absoluteness of the Covenant ; many of which having fallen in with those already discussed , and not above one or two remaining . The first , If any thing were required on our part , then beasting could not be excluded . This also Dr. Crisp vol. 10. p. 71. If any thing were done on our parts to partake of Christ , we might have wherein to boast , Rom. 4. 2. But I pray consider seriously how crosse this your Argument is to the very Text : For did not Abraham , the party spoken of there , do something for his part to partake of Christ , when he believed ? yet was he excluded from boasting . And doth not the Law of Fath , the Gospel , require faith on mans part , that Righteousnesse may be imputed ? why else is it called a Law ? Yet the Apostle saith expresly , that by this Law boasting is excluded , Rom. 3. 27. If indeed we could do any thing in a meritorious way , we might boast , not otherwise . The begger I hope , hath little to boast of , and yet doth he both crave and receive his Almes . The sinner hath lesse : for as that he doth can no way merit , no more then the beggers craving and receiving ; so nor can he do that , untill the Lord inable him . God must give him both a mouth and a hand , before he can speak for Christ to take him . Yet both he must have , before he can receive , the Lord having set down to himself ( as you your self acknowledg ) such a method and way of giving . The other which seems to be of more strength , and I think the strongest you bring , is this , If the Promise of Salvation were upon condition of believing , then men should believe before they be justified , contrary to Rom. 4. 5. where it is said , God justifies the ungodly . Now no where in Scripture Believers are called ungodly ; The same almost totidem verbis you may read in the Doctor , vol. 1. p. 170 , 171. Now for answer unto ths , I desire you to consider , what the Papists say concerning this Justification of the wicked . That wheresoever in Scripture God is said to justifie the ungodly , it must be understood that he also makes the ungodly just and righteous ; for otherwise the judgment of God would not be according to truth , and the Lord should do that himself which he forbids his creature to do , and abhors in his creature when ever he doth it , Exod. 23. 7. Isaiah 5. 23. Deuter. 25. 1. Prov. 17. 15. And lest you should think light of it , because it comes from them , though it is right to learn even from an enemy ; hear what the learned Pemble saith of this very rule cited by him . We embrace this rule ( saith he ) and the reason of it , acknowledging that where ever there is Justification , there must be Justice some way or other in the party Justified ▪ The God of truth should otherwise call darknesse light , and evil good . And therefore both that Author , as also Paraeus and Chamier , tells us , that the Righteousnesse of Christ imputed to this ungodly person is the ground of this gracious sentence of God , whereby he doth absolve , acquit , and justifie him . So that the person , though he be ungodly and unrighteous in himself , and so unjustifiable , yet is he godly , just , and righteous in Christ and through the Righteousnesse of Christ imputed to him justifiable . Let this then be agreed on ; i.e. 1. That the ground of this gracious sentence of God , whereby he justifies the ungodly must be some kind of Righteousnesse . And 2. That it is the righteousnesse of Christ imputed to the sinner . The Quaerie then will be , Whether this Righteousnesse of Christ be imputed to the sinner before he doth believe , or not till he believeth ? Now I think the Scriptures are very clear for the latter , that Righteousnesse is not imputed to the sinner til he doth believe : that very Text it self confirmes it , To him that believeth on him that justifies the ungodly , his faith is counted for Righteousnesse . It is to him that believeth that Righteousnesse is imputed ; and again , His faith is counted , &c. Take faith how you will , it must come into the imputation , the imputation is not without it . So again , Abraham believed God and it was accounted to him for Righteousnesse , ver . 3. When was it so accounted ? Certainly when he believed : It was whilest he was in uncircumcision indeed , but not whilest he was in unbelief : He received Circumcision ( saith the Apostle ) the Seal of the Righteousness of faith , which yet he had being uncircumcised . As he had Righteousnesse then , so had he faith too , for it was a Righteousnesse of faith . And as it was imputed unto him upon believing , so shall it be imputed unto us if we believe on him who raised up Jesus , vers . 24. Hence it is called the Righteousness of faith , for that it comes to be ours through faith . Faith takes it , receives it , puts it on . The Righteousnesse of God by Faith , Phil. 3. 9. We answer then that place in the Romans thus , 1. An ungodly person may be taken either for one who is wicked , and goes impenitently on in his wickedness , never once looking after Christ ; a sinner continuing in his impenitency and unbelief . Now such an ungodly person God doth not justifie ; for it is against both his truth and justice . 2. It may be taken for one that is ungodly and unjustifiable in himself ; but yet believing on Christ , is through him and his satisfaction Just , and so justifiable . Such an ungodly person God doth Justifie ; and thus Ames , Paraeus , Bishop Downam , and those other Divines I have in their descriptions of Justification , make not a sinner simply , but a believing sinner to be the subject of Justification , or the person to be justified . Now whereas you say , That no where in Scripture a Believer is called ungodly . I conceive it false , He is called so there : For who is the ungodly person spoken of there , but Abraham ? and he was justified ( as hath been shewed ) when he did believe . Besides , God the object of faith Justifying , who is described there to be the Justifier of the ungodly is said in ver . 26. of the foregoing Chapter , to be the Justifier of him that believeth in Jesus . I beseech you tell me , doth not the Apostle speak of one and the same Justification in both places ? Doth he not in both places describe one and the same person , the person that is justified ? Him then whom he calls a Believer on Christ in one place , the same he calls an ungodly person in the other ; and whom he cals an ungodly person in this , in that he stiles the same a believing person . Certainly , seeing ( as it is Chap. 3. vers . 30 ) that it is one God that justifies both the Circumcision by faith , and the uncircumcision through faith , i.e. All that are justified , both Jew and Gentile , circumcised or uncircumcised , by or through one and the same mean of faith . It must needs be that the ungodly person spoken of in the next Chapter , is such an ungodly person , as hath faith , and doth believe ; or else God should justifie some without faith , to which the former place doth aver the contrary . That place in the Romanes then concerning Gods justifying the ungodly , will not bear the Position you ground upon it ; viz. That sinners are justified before they do believe ; or that we do not believe , that we may be justified , as the Doctor expresseth it , an assertion as rotten as the foundation on which it is built ; and expresly contrary to the Apostle , who tells us , Galat. 2. 16. that hee had believed on Christ , that so he might be justified by the Faith of Christ . Thus have I given you an account of some , and those of the main of your Arguments , both wherein they have not satisfied me concerning the Tenent you endeavoured to maintain , and wherein also they have offended me , whilst they wounded that I hold for truth through the sides of Popery and Arminianism . I shall now shew you some grounds of my belief on the contrary : first taking leave in a word to state the Question , and to set downe how , and what I hold concerning it First then , I distinguish between both a condition and a meritorious cause , as also between it and an impulsive cause . By condition , I understand neither any thing meriting Justification at Gods hands in the least degree , nor yet any thing moving the Lord to Justifie or bestow Salvation on us . Secondly , By Conditions I understand the restipulation or repromission in a Covenant , the termes and Articles of Agreement in a Covenant betweene equals , and the thing commanded or required in a Covenant betweene Superiors and Inferiors , such as is the Covenant between God and man. Thirdly , Whereas there are conditions , yet I assert them not in any rigid and legal , but in an Evangelical way . Not so , as if they were not strictly and in a rigid exactnesse perfectly kept , there were no hope of Salvation ; but so , as if that they be not in some measure sincerely observed , there is sure damnation . Mr. Ball will tell you , that c whereas in the Covenant of Nature , perfect obedience is exacted , so that if there be the least failing in any jot or tittle , and that but once , a man can never be justied thereby , nor can the breach be made up by any repentance . In the Covenant of Grace , perfect obedience is indeed required , yet so as Repentance is admitted , and sincerity accepted . Conditions in this Evangelical way I plead for , and conceive , That God in the New Covenant doth not promise life and salvation absolutely unto his chosen , whether they believe and repent or no : but doth require from , and command them to repent and believe , if they will be partakers of the benefits purchased by his Son , and promised by himself in that his Covenant : which that they may do , he himself of his own grace , and for his own Sons sake bestowes faith and repentance on them . Nor have they a right to any actual enjoyment of these benefits untill they do actually repent and believe . The Grounds of my perswasion in this particular follow . 1. That Covenant , wherein is a mutual stipulation , is conditional . But such is the new Covenant ; therefore that is conditional . As on Gods part life and salvation are promised , so on mans repentance , and faith , and perseverance therein are required , and to be promised . Mar 1. 15. Chap. 6. 12. Acts 2 38. chap. 3. 19. chap. 20. 21. John 6. 28 , 29. chap. 3. 15 , 16. John 8. 24. Rom. 10 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 John 8. 31. Chap. 15 5 , 6 , 7 , 10. Heb. 3. 6. Chap. 10 , 38. He cannot see wood for trees , that doth not take notice of these Evangelical commands , wherein performance of Gospel conditions , and perseverance in that performance are required , they every where so abundantly occur . Choose we out one of the places named , and a little insist on it ; that Rom. 10 9. the rather for that in your answer to Mr. S. you make some reply thereto . How ( say you ) do you prove , that Rom. 10 9. is set down the forme and tenure of the New Covenant ? I deny it ; The Apostles intent is . &c. Sir , It is clear , as Calvin notes , that the Apostle here opposeth the Righteousnesse of faith to the Righteousnesse of Works . It is also clear , that in describing the Righteousnesse of Works he setteth downe the very tenor and form of that Covenant , The man that doth them shall live by them , ver . 5. And in opposition thereunto , delivers this to be the speech of the Righteousnesse of Faith , If thou confessest with thy mouth , and believest with thine heart , &c. If then it be granted , which cannot be denyed , that in these words , The man that doth them shal live by them , the tenor of the Covenant of Works is contained ; it must needs follow by the rule of opposition , that in these words , If thou confessest and believest , &c. the tenor of the Covenant of Grace is also contained . Besides , when the Apostle saith , The Word is nigh thee , &c. That is the Word of faith which we preach , That if thou confesse , &c. What ( I pray you ) doth he mean by the Word of Faith , but the Gospel ? or what else did the Apostle preach but the Gospel ? The sum of which he saith to be this , If thou confesse , if thou believe . &c. Sir , That Word or Gospel which the Apostle preached , wherein he held out the Righteousnesse of faith , and which he set in opposition against the Covenant of Works ; That same must needs be the Covenant of Grace . But such is the word here ; the tenor whereof he saith is , If thou confesse , &c. Ergo , It is the Covenant of Grace . And whereas you say , That the Apostles intent there is to shew Gods order and method in fulfilling the promises of the Covenant , and to describe those whom he will bring to Glory : though it make nothing against us ; for if that were his intent , he might have his intent , and describe both the one and the other , in setting down the Covenant . ( The conditions which lead to annexed promises , holding out Gods method unto us , and the counterpane of the Covenant or Conditions engraven on the heart , being the best character of a person to be glorified . ) Though ( I say ) this makes nothing against us ; yet if you consider the sense of the Apostles discourse , both in the latter end of the the foregoing Chapter , and in this ; or if you please to consult with Junius Parallels , where he hath a f whole Parallel about this place ; you shal find that the Apostles intent and scope is otherwise then you say ; namely , to prove unto the Jew , even out of Moses , that the end of the Law was not that they might be justified thereby , but that by the impossibility of keeping it , they might be driven to seek Justification from Christ by faith in another Covenant ; which Covenant of faith Moses ( though obscurely ) did intimate unto them in those expressions , Say not in thy heart , &c. The Word is nigh thee . By which he meant no other then that Word of Faith , Gospel , or Covenant of Grace which the Apostle preached ; the sum whereof was , That if thou confesse and believe , thou shalt be saved . Come we to some other Texts formerly alledged to prove a stipulation in the Covenant of Grace , and replied unto by you in your Sermon . That out of Gen. 17. touching the Covenant with Abraham was one . To which you say , If any condition were required , then that of Circumcision , which ought also to be performed by all under the Gospel ; so we should obtrude Judaism upon Christians . First , ( My good friend ) Are intimations of preaching Judaisme , Papisme , and Arminianism no calumnies ? Consider ( I pray you ) how you besmear the adversaries of your Opinion to bring an odium upon them . Secondly , What you reply , serves only , ad faciendum populum , there being no manner of Answer made unto the Argument . For whether Circumcision belong to us or no , it was required of Abraham and his Seed ; and the soul that refused to take it , is said to break the Covenant , and was to be cut off , ver . 14. So that the Argument remaines firme against you ; yea , not at all replyed unto ; which is this ; The Covenant with Abraham was the Covenant of free grace : But in the Covenant with Abraham there was a Condition required of the federates , Abraham and his Seed : Therefore in the Covenant of free grace , there is a Condition required of the Federates . Thirdly , As for that you say , We distinguish between the external Signe of the Covenant , and the substance of it . The one is alterable , the other remaines stil the same . Now Circumcision was but the external Sign of Abrahams part . The things or duties God did especially require of Abraham , were faith and sincere obedience , Rom. 4 3. Gen. 17. 1. Now these belong to Christians , as much as to Jewes , and to presse them on Christians is no Judaism . g Circumcision was a Sign obligatory to those which were in Covenant ; or a token of the restipulation of Abraham , obliging him and his posterity to faith and obedience of the Covenant to be performed to God. saith Paraeus . Fourthly , I conceive that mandate from the external signe of Circumcision to reach to us Christians . Though not in the letter , yet in the Analogy , and by vertue of it Christians stand to be baptized themselves ; also to bring their seed to partake of that Sacrament , which as the Apostle teacheth us , is our Christian Circumcision ; and he that wilfully refuseth may be said to break the Covenant , as well as he that formerly refused Circumcision . The same Covenant which gave a Commandment or Word of Restipulation for that Circumcision of Abraham and his Seed , giveth the same commandment or Word of Justification for Baptism of Believers and our seed , saith h Mr. C●tton of New England . The next places of Scripture to prove a stipulation were Heb. 8. 10. Heb. 2. 23. To which you reply by Interrogation : Is there any condition on mans part intimated here ? Doth not God promise to do all ? Doth he say , If you will be my people ? 1. Sir , what you me an by that expression , Doth not God promise to do all ? I wist not , Mr. Saltmarsh saith , It is enough for us to believe that Christ hath repented for us , believed for us . But I hope you are not so far gone . If you by it understand Gods gracious inabling of his creature to perform the conditions he himselfe requireth , I readily joyne with you . It is he gives us to repent and to believe , as hath been said already . But then I hope you will distinguish between , Gods gift and mans duty ; though the Ability be given of God , the Exercise of it , or work is mans . It is man himself that believeth and repenteth , though he receive ability from the Lord for both . 2. We answer your Demand , Is there any condition on mans part ? Yes , that there is ; namely this , They shall be my people . Can they be his people without dutiful subjection and obedience to him ? Here is this then , that God requires of them , that if they would have him to be a God to them , to pardon them , defend them , save them , &c. then they should take him for their God , depend on him , submit to him , obey , worship , and serve him , and carry themselves towards him as become his people : i They shall say , Thou art my God : Upon which Paraeus glosseth , k God saith , we are his people , making us to be his people . Our faith and our obedience is our saying , The Lord is our God. Nor is it material that God doth not formally condition with them , saying , If you will be my people , &c. The restipulation required , is no whit the lesse firm , when in the next Chapter the Prophet saith , l Only thou shalt abide for me many dayes ; and not , if thou wilt abide for me : it was neverthelesse a conjugal Compact . The cause of this kinde of expression may be either 1. for brevities sake : or secondly , as Mr. Ball notes , God enters into Covenant with man , not as his equall , but as his Superiour or Soveraign , appointing man his conditions in form of commands , which it's mans duty to accept of and obey : Or 3. Which I should rather chuse , to intimate thereby his gracious purpose of giving ability to perfom the Conditions , I will put my Lawes in their hearts . They shall be my people ; i e. I will not only require of them , that they know my Lawes , and obey me as becomes my people ; but by my Grace , I wil cause it to be wrought within them . Whether way you take it , either for Gods command injoyning them to be his people ; or for his promise to make them his people , it is not much material ; this still remaines either way , that they were to be his people . And this we have , even from the most absolute Promises , those of taking the stony heart away , giving a heart of flesh , a new heart , circumcising the heart , writing the Law on the heart ; which admit not , as I conceive , any antecedent condition , yet do they clearly shew that these things are required . This new heart is required , the writing the Law on the heart is required , and so of the rest : God doth require them in his people , and without men have them , they cannot be the people of God , nor expect salvation from God. These things ( Sir ) perswade me , notwithstanding all that you have hitherto replied , to adhere still to what I have formerly conceived and delivered concerning these Texts ; viz. That they do hold out a stipulation in the Covenant , and then it will be conditional . Now because this work is swollen bigger by the one half already then ( when I set pen to paper ) I intended it should have been , I shall briefly add some more Arguments , and draw toward a close : And because we are upon stipulations in the Covenant , add we an Argument or two of that nature . 1. That Covenant which is mandatory as well as promissory , and contains a Law as well as a promise , that Covenant hath a stipulation which they must subscribe to , who will be federates and Covenanters therein ; for whenever the Lord annexeth a command unto a Promise , the Promise is not absolute but conditional : there is something required in the command of him who will enjoy the benefit of the Promise . Now the New Covenant is of this nature ; it is not a meer Promise ( as some would have it ) but a Law as well as a Promise , and therefore called by the Apostle , The Law of faith , Rom. 3. 27. The Law of faith is that Doctrine which doth require faith to the obtaining of that Righteousnesse which is freely imputed , saith Paraeus . That is the Law of Works which teacheth that Righteousnesse is to be obtained by Works but the Law of faith teacheth , it is to be hoped for from the mercy of God alone , saith Martyr . The Doctrine teaching Righteousness by faith , is that which the Word of the Gospel doth bind us to if we will be saved , saith Bernard in his Thesaur . The Condition which offereth and promiseth Salvation , is this Condition , If wee believe . Wilson in his Dictionary on the words . 2. That Covenant which man is forbidden to break , commanded to keep , and wherein man is tyed and bound unto God ; that Covenant must needs have conditions and restipulations on mans part ; for it is in regard of the things required from man , that man is said to break or keep , or be bound by the Covenant . But such is the New Covenant . Abrahams was such , My Covenant shalt thou keep , Gen. 17. 9. Davids was such ( though you averred the contrary in your Sermon ) Psal . 132. 12. If thy children will keep my Covenant . Such was Israels , Ezek. 20. 37. I will make you to passe under the rod , and bring you into the bond of the Covenant : and what Covenant doth he mean but that mentioned , Ezek. 36. 26. and Hos . 2. ? The places considered seem to me to hold out one and the same . Such is also that administration of it under which we are . The Romans were n free from righteousness , before they believed on Christ , and entred into Covenant with him ; but after they were baptized into Christ they were o Servants unto Righteousnesse . The stile of Gods people formerly was , they were Covenant keepers , Psal . 25. 10. Psal . 103. 17. And is it not as proper to them now , as it was then ? May not the people of God under the Gospel be guilty of breach of Covenant , and that not only in regard of their Covenants with men , nor yet in regard of those necessary engagements which occasionally they make unto the Lord , but in regard of their Baptism , and that solemne Covenant between God and them , which Baptism doth seal . I have not quite forgotten Mr. Perkins Catechism , which I learned when I was a child , where I was taught in the fift Principle expounded , to answer this Question , How comes it to passe that many after their Baptism for a long time feel not the effect and fruit of it , and some never ? Thus answered , The fault is not in God who keeps his Covenant , but the fault is in themselves , in that they do not keep the condition of the Covenant , to receive Christ by faith , and repent of all their sins . And a little after , How if a man never keep the Condition to which he bound himself in Baptism ? Answer , His damnation shall be greater , because he breaks his Vow made unto God. Mr. Perkins you see , teacheth Conditions in the New Covenant , in regard of which it may be kept or broken by us Christians . 3 This brings to my mind another Argument ; That Covenant wherein a Promise is required of the federates , which Promise they do also seal to God in receiving of the Covenant Seal , that Covenant hath a restipulation ; But such is the new Covenant . For the confirmation of the Minor , I desire you to consider how in the Primitive times growne persons were required to professe their repentance and faith in Christ before they were admitted unto Baptism . Repent ( saith Peter , Acts 2 ) and be baptized : Whence also it is called the Baptism of Repentance ; Mark 1. 4. Acts 19. 4. And John is said to Baptise men unto repentance , Mat. 3. 11. So when the Eunuch desired Baptism of Philip. Acts 8. 36 , 37. saying , What doth hinder me to be baptized ? Philip replyes , That if he believed with all his heart , he might ; whereupon followed both his confession of Faith and Baptism . The Baptist also requires those whom he baptized to bring forth fruits worthy amendment of life . From which places Zanchy and Piscator collect , that faith and Repentance and new obedience , were required of all those grownpersons who were baptized , they were to make profession of their repentance and faith , and to make Promise of new Obedience . Take Piscators note upon Matth. 3. p Baptism is to be administred to no person that is of years , unlesse he shall first of all make a confession of sins , and of faith in Christ , and withal a Promise of leading a holy life . These Professions were afterward for the ease of the party to be baptized , turned into Interrogations and Answers : The Minister demanding of the party to be baptized , Dost thou believe in God ? the party was wont to answer , I do believe . The Minister again inquiring . Dost thou renounce the Divel ? &c. he replyed , I do renounce . Which Answer when Infants could not make of themselves , they had Parents and Sponsors who made it for them . Thus was there a formal stipulation required of growne persons at their first admission into Covenant and the administration of the seal of the Covenant to him . Farther , As before baptism , growne persons did thus professe and promise , so by being baptized did they seal . For this Seal of Baptism , as it is Gods seal to us assuring us of remission and other benefits promised in the Covenant : so is it also the Christians Seal unto God , whereby he seals the promise of Repentance , Faith and new Obedience : Hence are they said to be baptized into Christ ; into his Death , into the Name of the Father , Son and Holy Ghost . To be baptized into any ones name is , to be consecrated to his Worship ; so that he is named from him as from his Lord , and that he dedicate himself wholly to his service , saith Piscator . And learned Zanchie having at large expressed the same in several particulars , doth briefely sum up all , r Baptism is a note and mark whereby we do protest that we will observe the Conditions of that Covenant which in Christ is established between God and us . Baptism is ( saith Bishop Davenant ) A ſ Covenant made with God of loading a more holy life , therefore we must take care that what was once Sacramentally done in Baptism , may be performed truly throughout our whole life . s As Souldiers ( saith Martyr ) swear in the name of the General , and are so bound to him , that it is not lawful for them afterwards to be conversant in the enemies tents , if they do , the offence is capital : So by Baptism we are obliged unto Christ , and we swear that we will not afterwards at any time revolt to the Divel . So also Paraeus , t It is known from the Catechisme , That we are baptized in the name of the Trinity , because we are bound in the name of God to faith in , to Worship and obedience of God ; and we do also promise again these things unto God. We are baptized into the death of Christ in a double respect ; first , in respect of God , in as much as he doth by the Seal of Baptism , give and seal to us the benefits of the death of Christ . Secondly in respect of our selves , by promising again faith to believe these so great benefits of Christ , and the mortifying of sin by the power of the death of Christ , that it reign not over us any more . With these forementioned doth also Mr. Byfield concur , who tels us , that Baptism is a u Bond that tyeth us to the desires and endeavours after the beginning and finishing of our death to sin and Spiritual life , according to these Authors sense of the places forenamed . Baptisme sealeth our promise of Repentance , Faith , and new Obedience to God , as well as his promise of remission unto us . It is our pledge , our Covenantmony , and military oath , whereby we do tye and bind our selves to the service of the Most High ; which I cannot possibly conceive how it should be such , if there were no restipulation , or repromission in the Covenant , as you maintain . Thus much at present concerning Restipulation in the Covenant ; passe we on to some other Arguments : and because I remember you told me , that I had in my Sermons a number of Citations out of the Old Testament , you shall hear some more of the Arguments I used then , for some of them I have set down already . To what hath been said add then , Gods mercies are to be obtained in Gods way , that way and manner which God hath from all eternity pitched on therein to bring men to the enjoyment of these mercies : But God hath from all eternity purposed to give Remission , Justification , Adoption , &c. as through Christ ( for he hath predestinated us to the Adoption of children , through Jesus Christ , Ephes . 1. 5 , 7. ) so through faith in Christ ▪ and in a way of repentance , Rom. 3. 25 , 28. chap. 8. 28. Acts 13. 38 , 39 , 48. chap. 5 31. chap. 11. 18. Therefore till men actually repent and believe , they cannot actually partake of remission , Adoption , Justification , and those other benefits and purchases of Christs passion . Againe , those mercies which the Prophets and Apostles propose and promise unto men , not absolutely , but on termes of Repentance and Faith : they are not absolutely , but upon performance of the proposed termes to be expected ; but the faithful messengers of God , both in the Old and New Testament , do both proffer and promise remission in this manner . Look into the Sermons of the Prophets , and we shal find in their fullest and highest descriptions of free grace and offers of mercy , they still require repentance of men . So Isai . 1. Though your sins be as scarlet , they shall be as white as snow . But when ? when they should seriously set upon the practice of Repentance : for so in the words foregoing , Wash ye , cease to doe evil , &c. Come now and let us reason . No parley at all before this to be expected So cha . 55. a place much insisted on by Dr. Crisp for to prove the absolute freenesse now in hand . There are many things required , as thirsting , coming , hearing , seeking , calling , forsaking of sin , and turning unto God. So the other Prophets , Jer. 3. 12 , 13 , 14. Ezek. 18. 31 , 32. chap. 33. 11. chap. 36. 26 , 27. Zach. 1. 3. Now whereas you told me , That these were proofs out of the Old Testament , I hope you neither deny proofs thence to be authentical , nor yet the Prophets then to have been Preachers of free grace . The Covenant ( I hope ) was for substance the same then that it is now ; not a conditional one then , and an absolute one now . The Fathers of the Old Testament ( saith Luther ) before Christ appeared in the flesh , had him in the Spirit , believed in him , and were saved by him as we are , according to the saying , Jesus Christ is one yesterday , to day , and shal be the same for ever . Luther in Galat. c. 4. v. 2. Come to the New Testament , and we shall find that salvation was held out in the same manner then . Christ and his fore-runners were Preachers of Repentance ▪ yea , the Commission for preaching of the Gospel which is still on record , doth shew how it was then , and is still to be published , not without , but on terms of Repentance , Luke 24. 47. That Repentance and remission oft sin should be preached to all Nations . The rule of which their commission the Apostles observed , as they themselves tell us , Testifying both to Jewes and Gentiles repentance towards God , and faith towards our Lord Jesus Christ , Acts 20. 21. Nay it would be no difficult task to pick out most conditional Particles out of their , and our Saviours Sermons , &c. scil . Mark 9. 23. Acts 8. 37. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , Matth. 6. 14. Rom. 10 9 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , si modo , Coloss . 1. 23. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , Matth. 6 15. John 8. 24 Matth. 18. 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , Mark 11. 26. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , Mark 5. 36. If , but if , unlesse , except only si , sin , modo , dum , dummodo , were conditional , when I learned my Grammer . 3. The Office of the Ministry , what is it for , but to prepare people for mercy by working something in them that may fit them for the receipt of the benefits promised in the New Covenant . As John was , so are they to be Christs Harbingers , and are to make ready a people prepared for the Lord , Luke 1. 17. To preach to them that they might be saved 1 Thess . 2. 16. To open their eyes and to bring them from darknesse to light , and from the kingdom of Satan unto God , that they may receive remission of sins , &c. Acts 26 18. Thou hast ascended up on high , thou hast lead captivity captive , and hast received gifts for men , even for the rebellious , that the Lord God may dwell among them , Psal . 68. 18 On which Dr. Crisp thus glosseth , Vol. 2. p. 410. Who is that Them ? The Rebellious saith the Text : And p. 412. The Holy Ghost doth not say that the Lord takes Rebellious persons and fits and prepares them by Sanctification , and then when they are fitted , he will come and dwell with them ; but even then , without any intermission , without any stop , even when they are rebellious the Lord Christ hath received gifts for them , that the Lord God may dwell among them : Thus the Doctor . But certainly the Apostle Paul was more acquainted with the mind of the Holy Ghost then Dr. Crisp : now he , Ephes 4. 8. alledging this of the Psalmist , openeth it far otherwise , and delivereth it , so as to me it seemes full for the confirmation of that we have in hand : When ( saith he ) he ascended up on high , he led captivity captive , and gave gifts to men : I hope he gave no other then what he received for them . Now what gave he ? It followes , He gave some Apostles , and some Prophets , and some Evangelists , and some Pastors and Teachers : and for what end ? For the perfecting of the Saints , for the work of the Ministry , for the edifying of the body of Christ ; till we come , &c. He did not then receive this gift , that though they were rebellious , the Lord God might dwell among them whilst they remained so , as the Doctor avers . But on the contrary , he received and gave abroad these gifts of the Ministerial function , that thereby people might bee taken off their rebellious principles , and broken off their rebellious practices , and fitted for the communion with the Most High : The sum is , the Ministers of the Word are sent on this businesse to prepare people for the Lord , for remission and salvation ; therefore there is something required of them , some work to be wrought in them , on them , before they can actually partake of remission or salvation from the Lord , or enjoy communion with the Lord. 4. That which these Ministers of the Gospel have directed sinners to do for the obtaining of Remission , Justification , and Salvation , that in order of nature is to be done before Remission , Justification and Salvation can actually be obtained : But the Ministers of the Gospel have directed sinners to repent and believe for the obtaining of , &c. Acts 2 38. chap. 3. 19. chap. 16 30 , 31. Gal. 2. 16. Nor was it remission or justification in cognoscend , only , that they were directed to seek in this way of faith and repentance . Can any imagine that the meaning of that Query of the Jaylor , Sirs , what shall I do to be saved ? should be no more then this , What shall I do to be certified and assured of my Salvation ? Besides , that Justification , that Paul did himself , and directed others to seek by faith , Rom. 3. 28. Gal. 2. 16. was such in which works have no hand . But to Justification in cognoscendo , or in foro conscentiae , to the evidencing to us , and assuring us that we are justified , works do concur , James 2. 16. 24. A man is justified ( assured of Justification ) by Works , and not by faith only . So that the other Justification must be of another and different kinde , works being wholly excluded from having any thing to do therein . 5. They who are in an estate of wrath and death until they do believe , and then upon their believing passe out of that estate into an estate of life ; they are not actually justified till they do believe : But the Elect are in such an estate of wrath and death till they do actually believe Ephes . 2. Children of wrath , even as others . Tit. 3. 3. and then when they believe , they passe out of that estate . 1 John 3 14. We know we are passed from death to life . Under the power of death we were then , otherwise we could not have passed from it . And when passed we from it ? the same Apostle in his Gospel tells us , John 5. 24. chap. 3. ult . in one of which places he assures us , that he that heareth and believeth , is passed : and in the other , He that believeth not , the wrath of God stil abides on him ; which terms of passing and abiding , clearly shew that all the Elect are , and continue actually in that woful estate , until they do believe . I hope you will not say , they passe in their own sense and apprehension , and so are children of wrath according to their apprehensions . The Apostle saith , They are children of wrath even as others : and certainly others are not only sensibly and appearingly so , nay , perhaps neither of these wayes , but really so . For my part , I conceive no difference between a vessel of Election and a vessel of wrath , but only in regard of Gods purpose and Christs purchase , which til it be brought into act doth make no real change in the parties state and condition . 6. Until men come actually to have Christ , to be united unto him , and one with him , they cannot partake of Justification , nor have any right thereto , 1 John 5. 12. He that hath the Son hath life , he that hath not the Son , hath not life . But until men have faith they have not Christ , nor are united to him , for by faith they receive him , John 1. 12. go to him , John 6. 35 , 37. Feed on him ; dwell in him , and he in them , John 6. 40 56. By faith they live in him , and he in them , Gal. 2. 20. By faith he dwelleth in their hearts , Ephes . 3. 17. Ergo , Until men have faith , and by faith do actually believe on him , they cannot partake of Justification through him , John 3. 36. I remember that when in a private conference I pressed some of these places of Scripture , in stead of answering to them , you demanded , Whether the Elect had no benefit by Christ , nor right to Christ before they did believe ? To which I replyed , 1. That though there be a purpose in God to give salvation to them , and a purchase of it by Christ for them , yet had they no right thereunto until they had faith . 2 That they might have benefit by Christ before they had right to Christ , as in the instant of their Conversion , when the Spirit of Christ did work faith and repentance in them . That first Benefit ( they had ( I conceive ) in order of nature , though not in time , before they had right , it being the very conveyance of right over to them , and stating them therein , ) must precede their having of right , or otherwise they should have right before they had it . This you told me then was grosse nonsense ; and since you have averred in Pulpit , that to say men have benefit and not right , is palpable nonsense . But 1. Sir , Whether nonsense or no , what is it you say to the places cited ? These Texts tell me plainly that unlesse I have faith , I have not Christ , and that unlesse I have Christ I cannot have life , no nor right to , or interest in it ; unlesse a man may have right to , and interest in life through Christ , and yet for all not live , but perish everlastingly : which I think will be worse then nonsense to aver : So that the Argument remains firm and unanswered . 2 For your Crimination , though you might have dealt more fairly , and produced the manner of our asserting it , as well as the assertion it self ; yet we must be content to take what you give , and as you give it , and shall cast it up into the sachel to the other Legacies you have bestowed on us ; as Arminianism , Papism , Judaisme , absolute contradictions and weak evasions , &c. 3 For the grosse and palpable nonsense it self , Benefit and not right . I must professe unto you , that as grosse and palpable as it is , my dull pate doth not yet apprehend it . All the while the father lives , the child hath benefit by his fathers means , but what right he hath thereto I know not : the coats he wears , the food he eats , are not his own by right , I think , but his Fathers ; yea when the father dies and gives a Legacy to his child to be paid at such an age , until the child come to that age it cannot challenge the Legacy or portion given him by his father , nor dispose of it , if he dye before , yet hath he benefit thereby ; if he hath jus ad rem , a right to the thing , he hath not jus in re , a right in the thing , until that period of time , notwithstanding the Donation of his father . But to come yet nearer to the matter in hand . Suppose that some poor woman cast in prison for debt , where she is like to perish , should haply meet with a rich friend , who pitying her sad condition , and taking an affection to her , should procure her inlargement out of prison , intending to wed and marry her : I hope here it would be no non-sense to say , that this woman had benefit by this intended husband , before she had right to him , and inteterest in him : for , till the match or contract she cannot have any right in him at all . The case is ours , we are indebted to God , and in prison too , the Lord by his Spirit delivering us , doth make us his heavenly Bride . This first benefit , our delivering out of bonds , we must have in some measure from Christ , in order of Nature , before we can give our consent to the Match , and by faith take the Lord Jesus for our husband . May we not say in this case that we have benefit ? viz. the grand benefit of Regeneration by him , before we have right to him ? Is it nonsense to say so ? I am sure Mr. Thomas Goodwin writes something after this manner , v The promises of forgivenesse are not as the pardon of a Prince , which meerly contein an expression of his royal word for pardoning ; so as we in seeking of it , do rest upon , and have to do only with his word and Seal , which we have to shew for it : but Gods promises of pardon are made in his Son , and are as if a Prince should offer to pardon a Traitor upon mariage with his child , whom in , and with that pardon he offers in such a relation , so as all that would have pardon , must first seek out for his child : And thus it is in the matter of believing ; the reason of which is , because Christ is the grand promise , in whom all the Promises are Yea and Amen . 2 Cor. 1. 20. The Interest in a heiresse Lands goes with her person , and with the relation of mariage to her : so all the Promises hang on Christ , and without him , there is no interest to be had in them . So Mr. Reynolds Life of Christ p. 466. tells me , That till there be this consent on our side , it is but a wooing , there is no marriage , no Covenant made . Pag. 478. That our union and communion with Christ , is on our part the work of Faith , whose office it is to unite to Christ and gaine possession of him . Yea , Luther also on Gal. 2 20. Faith therefore must be purely taught , namely , that thou art so entirely joyned to Christ , as that thou maist say , I am one with Christ , his righteonsnesse and Victory are mine , &c. For by faith we are joyned so together , that wee are become one flesh and one bone . So that this faith doth couple Christ and me more neer together , then the husband is coupled to his wife . And Dr. Preston New Coven . p. 458. avers the same . Sir , these men know how to write sense ; now they tel us , that our right comes through our marriage with Christ , and that spiritual match is not made up untill we believe , which be the two main pieces of that you call grosse non-sense For , as for the third , that we cannot believe till God for Christs sake vouchsafe us that benefit , that they all maintain it , I need not tell you . In fine your nonsense bespeaks you in this Argument , which perhaps may puzzle both your senses and intellectuals solidly to answer . All that be united unto Christ , and quickned by him , before they have right to him , do receive special benefits from him before they have right to him : But all the Elect are united unto Christ and quickned by him , before they have right to him , or to salvation through him : Ergo , All the Elect do receive special benefits by Christ , before they have right to him , or to salvation through him . Or , All that have union before they have right have benefit before they have right ; But all the Elect have union before they have right ; Ergo , All the Elect have benefit before they have right . But we have right to those benefits ( say you ) by vertue of Gods Largess and Donation . The same I also find in w Dr. Ames . But this I conceive to hold true onely in absolute Grants ; for if the Gift or Grant be conditional , then is there a right unto the benefit granted , when that condition is wrought in the Legatee , and not before . Swynborn in his Treatise of Testaments , p. 150. tels us , That if the Testator give his daughter an hundred pounds , if she marry with advice and approbation of her Uncle , in case the party marry without advising with her Uncle about it , she loseth her right to the Legacy given her ; ( which by the way , may shew the weakness of that Argument that is taken from the word Testament , which some use against Conditions : as if Conditions could not stand with a Testamentary disposition ) Now such is Gods grant of salvation : it is made in Christ , it is made in him unto Believers ; it is not made to sinners , as sinners , as some aver , but to repenting and believing sinners , John 6. 38. 39 , 40. This is the will of him that sent me , that every one that seeth the Son and believeth on him , have everlasting life . The Grant being made unto us as Believers , I conceive we have not right unto the benefit granted until we doe believe . Sure I am , we cannot have right , but by and through our union to him ; which union being an inestimable benefit , we cannot have right before we have benefit . 7. Because you are so ready to charge your Adversaries with nonsense and contradictions , let us mind you of the old rule , He that accuseth another of dishonesty , must look well to himself : and let the inconsequences which necessarily follow from your Doctrine be our last Argument . I beseech you therefore to read me those riddles your Tenents seem to me to contain ; and to lead me out of those mazes and Meanders which I think your Positions lead unto , at least to deliver your self out of them ; for perhaps my senses may not lead me to follow your clue unlesse I see better solutions then I have seene or heard from you hitherto . I beseech you tell me then , 1. How there can be Many , yea or any true Believers who were never humbled , when yet all men must see their Righteousnesse drosse and dung , must be schooled by the Law to know their need of Christ , before they can or will make out unto him ? 2. How the same man may be actually reconciled to God , have wrath removed from him , and be beloved of God with the love of complacency , and yet at the same time in regard of the same evil works , be an enemy unto God , a child of wrath , and have wrath abiding on him ? 3. How the same man may be actually justified and quickned , and yet actually dead in regard of the same sins , at the same time ? 4. How the same man at the same time can be a member of Christ , one in him , and united to him , as he must be who is actually justified , and a member also of the divel , as he cannot but be who still remains an ungodly , impenitent , and unbelieving person ? 5. How faith in the work of Justification serves for any farther use then to assure us that we are justified , seeing it doth not concur to the essence and being of it , or to the constituting of us in a state justifiable ? and how we are said to be justified by Faith and not by Works , when Works assure us of our being justified as well as Faith. 6 How in the Petition , Forgive us our debts , we can pray for any thing more then assurance of pardon , when actual pardon is passed long before ? And how sins can be actually pardoned before they be committed , and the guilt removed before it is contracted ? 7 How God who promiseth pardon to Believers only , and condemneth thousands for their impenitency and unbelief , can without blemish of his Honour , Truth , and Justice , give pardon to any in his impenitency and unbelief ? 8 How a man can be said to be bound by Covenant , to keep or break the Covenant , when yet in the Conant there are no conditions on mans part required to be performed ? 9 Why it doth not follow from your Tenents , that a man may be actually Justified and saved without faith , when yet you maintain actual Justification before faith and faith to be required not to the essence of it , or interesting of persons in it , but only to the assuring them of their interest therein ? 10. Why it follows not also from them , that Christians may live as they list , seeing you hold that no conditions are on their part required , so that they cannot break the Covenant ? Whether Doctor Preston dares the Believer to sin if hee can , I yet finde not ; but this I find , That hee holds that the Believer may both sin , and by sinning may break the Covenant , as you may find in his Treatise of the New Covenant . p. 458 , 459 460. &c. These are some of the many ( for more might be named ) straites and intricacies , your Positions lead your self and your followers into ; out of which , how you will rid your self I wot not : but sure I am , that your Solutions hitherto given , do yeild no manner of real satisfaction , not only , not to my self , but not to any other of your godly and intelligent Auditors , that I have yet met with . Toward the close of your Sermon , you ushered in your Authorities with this Objection , But many good Divines call it a Conditional Covenant . But Sir , you are meal mouthed in the very Objection ; for not only many , but the most part of Divines call it so . All that I have ever yet met with , Dr. Crisp , Mr. Saltmarsh , and your self exepted . As for those Authors you bring , I shall by and by shew your fowle play in citing some of them , and your mistake of others ; and discover most , if not all of them to be on my side , and to be only against meritorious Conditions . The like mincing you used in a passage in the beginning of your Sermon ; viz. That some good Divines say ; That Faith and Repentance are the way to glory . Whereas if you be pleased to rub your poll , I believe you may call to mind , not only that some , but most good Divines call these Conditions , and say as much of good Works as you here allow to Faith ; namely , that they are via ad regnum , the way to the Kingdom , though not Causa regnandi , the cause of reigning . I am sure Mr. Perkins , Dr. Preston , Bishop Davenant , and most others I have read , do call them so . But you are politick in these expressions ; for thereby you would perswade your hearers , that you had many on your side ; like some Travellers who passing on in solitary wayes , keep a whistling and a hooping as if they had a great deal of company , whereas alas they are either wholly alone , or at most have but one or two Companions . Now Sir , for your reply to this Objection , we shall refer it to the close of all , and at present shall look into the Authours you bring , and see whether they stand for the opinion for which you cited them , or rather against it , as shall be made to appear ; and then shall add some others to them . You begin with the Fathers , but there you are sparing in your citations ; you tell us the Question was rarely agitated then . But you might have said , that the Fathers , if they faulted in any thing about the matter in Controversie ; it was in giving too much to Faith , Repentauce and good Works , by their hyperbolical commendations of them , stiling them meritorious , and the like ; as both Mr. Gataker in his Rejoynder to Mr. Saltmarsh , p. 53. and Bishop Davenant , de Justit . Actual . cap. 53. Men better vers'd in the Fathers then you or I , will tell you . That you bring out of Augustin , makes not at all against conditions in the Covenant , but against the power of free will asserted by Pelagius . The same Authour will tell you , x He that made thee without thee , will not save thee without thee ( as I have often heard out of Pulpits when I was a Scholer . ) And Whomsoever he draweth , he draweth him being willing . Our faith distinguisheth the just from the unjust , not by the Law of Works , but of Faith it self . Christ is not awake in him in whom faith doth sleep . The Justification by the Faith of Jesus Christ hath been given , is given , and shall be given to Believers , before , under , and after the Law. By faith we find that which the Jewes have lost . And elsewhere answering the Objection of the Pelagians , from the command of faith and repentance , whereby they would prove that we had power to do them , else the command of them would be to no purpose ; he saith , By commanding , he ( God ) doth admonish us to do what we can , and to beg for that which we are not able to do . y Know O man ( saith he in another place ) by the precept , what thou oughtest to have ; in the reproof , that 't is through thy owne fault that thou hast it not ; in the prayer learne from whence thou maist recieve that which thou wouldest have . He shews in another place in what respect the Apostle saith , The Justification of life came upon all men ; z Not because all men do believe in Jesus Christ , but because no man is justified except he do believe in him . It is therefore said , all men , that it might not be thought that any one might be saved by any other meanes whatsoever , but by him . Yea , this Champion of free grace , hath so many high , yea , haply over high commendations of faith , that out of him Bellarmine produceth not one or two , but many Citations to prove a meritorious caue sality of faith in the work of Justification , as you may sein his first Book de Justific . c. 17. 2. Prosper I have not , yet by the allegations I have read , cited out of him , I cannot conceive that Author to be against Conditions , but rather for them . I shall name a sentence or two . a Faith is the foundation of Righteousness , which no good works go before , but from which all do proceed ; from thence ( i.e. from the Doctrine of the Apostles ) every one doth receive life , which faith alone doth bring forth . 3. Add to Prosper , Jerome in Psalm 5. b Therefore thou shalt besprinckle me with this hysop , when thou shalt poure upon me the vertue of his blood , when Christ shall dwell in me by faith . And Moses distinguished in Leviticus between the Righteousnesse of Faith and Deeds , that the one is by works ; the other only by the credulity of faith . 4. So Ambrose . c According to the purpose of Grace it is so decreed by God , that the Law ceasing , the Grace of God should require faith alone to Salvation . And this Law ( to wit of the Spirit ) doth give liberty , requiring Faith alone . 5 Chrysostom , as I find him cited by Bishop Downham . Thou obtainest Righteousnesse , not by sweat and labour , but receivest it by gift from above , bringing one thing only from within ; viz. to believe . Nothing therefore in us doth concur to the Act of Justification , but only faith ; in Rom. 1. 17. and again in Rom. 3. 27. What is the Law of Faith ? to save by Grace : Here he sheweth the power of God , that he hath not only saved , but justified , and brought to glory , and that not requiring works , but seeking faith only . 6. Theodoret , cited by the same Author . Our Lord Christ hath by his bloud procured our salvation , Solam à nobis fidem exigens , requiring of us faith alone ; in Rom. 3. 25. 7. Theophylact , in Rom. 4. 5. Doth he that is to be justified bring any thing ? Faith only . By these I hope it doth sufficiently appear , That the Fathers held not Redemption to be absolute , as if nothing were required from us in regard of Application ; but on the contrary , that faith was required of us if we would be partakers of the Salvation purchased ; that it was required of us before our actual Justification , and did concur thereto . Passe we from these to later Writers , among whom , let Martin Luther be the first . Now it is true , that in the place you cited , he saith , The Promises of the Law are conditional , but the Promises of the New Testament have no such conditions , nor require any thing of us , nor depend upon on any Conditions of our worthinesse . But here I conceive he excludes meritorious Conditions , partly , because he expresseth himself very cautelously , saying , No such conditions , and no conditions of our worthinesse . And also because he doth elsewhere often aver , that something is required of us . I might here mind you of what Chemnicius saith in the place before cited , who being a Lutheran , could not but be better acquainted with Luthers Tenents then you or I ; namely , that Luther was not against Preparations of order , but only Preparations of merit ; and for proof of it , cites him on the third Chapter to the Galatians , where we find vers . 30. this passage , The use of the Law is to terrifie and fright to Christ , who is the end of the Law for Righteousnesse . And vers . 2. Christs coming profits neither the carelesse nor the desperate , but only such who have been tormented and terrified with the Law for a time , and now with sure trust come to Christ . Which passages do clearly shew , that he held , there ought to be a work of the Law upon the heart before its close with Christ , not to make it worthy of Christ , but to make it long and gasp after Christ . I might tell you also , How in a Letter written to Mr. Gasper Guttil , and translated by Mr. Rutherford , the same Martin Luther vehemently inveighs against those who would have the Doctrine of Grace to be preached in the first place , and afterwards the revelation of wrath , calling it a new method , a curious crotchet , and the broachers of it jugling Gypsies ; and averreth expresly , that the Apostles method , Rom. 1. 2 , 3. was directly opposite thereto , which was first to denounce the wrath of God from heaven , and make all the world sinners and guilty before God ; then when they see this , to teach them farther how they may obtain grace and be justified . As also that notable place on Gal. 2. 16. The true way to Christianity is this , that a man do first acknowledge himself by the Law to be a sinner . A little after , When a man is thus taught and instructed by the Law , then he is terrified and humbled , then he seeth indeed the greatness of his sin , and cannot find in himself one spark of the Law of God ; therefore he justifieth God in his Word , and confesseth that he is guilty of death and eternal damnation . The first part then of Christianity is the preaching of repentance , and the knowledg of our selves . And some few lines after , The Law doth nothing else but utter sin , terrifie and humble , and by this meanes prepareth us to Justification , and driveth us to Christ . And about two leaves after , Being thus terrified by the Law , the man utterly despaireth of his own strength , he looks about , and sigheth for the help of a Mediator and Saviour . Here then cometh in good time the healthful Word of the Gospel , and saith , Son , thy sins are forgiven thee , believe in Jesus Christ crucified for thy sins . These sayings of Luther , Sir , do fully assure me that Luther held a necessity of Legal sorrow and humiliation in persons to be justified , and that to prepare them for Justification , which is directly against the second Position of your former Sermons , concerning the absolutenesse of the Gospel , wherein you pleaded what you could , against the necessity of such legal sorrow , and humiliation . But passe we over these , and consult we Luther about that necessary mean of faith ; Let the Question be , whether in the Gospel faith be not required to the actual enjoyment of Justification , and Remission , and to the obtaining of a right thereto , and interest therein ? Or whether we may have a right to , and interest in , or actual enjoyment of these benefits without faith , or before faith ? We wil not go beyond his Commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians for the discovering of his mind herein ; and begin we where we left , Chap. 2. ver . 16. Here is to be noted , that these three , Faith , Christ , and Acceptation , or Imputation must be joyned together ; Faith taketh hold on Christ , and hath him present as a Ring doth a precious stone ; and whosoever shall be found having this confidence in Christ apprehended in the heart , him will God account for Righteous . This is the mean , and this is the merit whereby we attain the remission of sins and Righteousnesse . So on vers . 20. of the same Chapter , a place cited already , he teacheth that it is through faith we are united to Christ , and come to call the benefits we have by him , ours , Cap. 3. 13. about the middle . For as much then as Christ reigns by his grace in the hearts of the Faithful , there is no sin , no death , nor curse . But where Christ is not knowne , there all these things do still remain ; Therefore all they that believe not , do lack this inestimable benefit , and glorious Victory . And on ver . 14. We are all accursed before God , before we know Christ ; and there is no other way to avoid the Curse but to believe . A little after , This gift of the Spirit , we receive not by any other Merits then by faith alone : Ver. 26. Faith in Christ maketh us the children of God. And Verse 28. comparing our believing to the looking on the brasen Serpent , saith thus , This is true faith concerning Christ , and in Christ , whereby we are made members of his body , flesh of his flesh , and bone of his bone . In him therefore we live , move , and have our being : Christ and our faith must be throughly joyned together . Vers . 29. If ye be Christs , then are you Abrahams Seed ; that is to say , If ye believe , and be baptized into Christ ; If ye believe I say , &c. then are ye the children of Abraham , not by nature , but by Adoption . Yea , in the place first cited , with which we shall conclude this testimony , cha . 2. 16. Because thou believest in me ( saith the Lord ) and thy faith layeth hold on Christ , whom I have freely given unto thee , that he might be thy Mediator and High Priest , therefore be thou justified and righteous . Wherefore God doth accept or account us as righteous only for our faith in Christ . Because we do apprehend Christ by Faith , all our sins now are no sins ; But where Christ and faith bee not , there is no remission or covering of sins , but meer Imputation of sinne and Condemnation . I hope Sir , in those places Luther speaks plainly enough to the purpose in hand , and doth sufficiently declare his belief in this particular to be , that faith is required to our justification , and that to the obtaining of it , that it doth marry us to Christ , and so state us in a right unto his benefits , that till we have this faith , we are accursed caitiffes , under death , wrath and condemnation , and that before God , or in his sight . Nay Sir , he doth say , that it is because of our faith , and for our faith , and that faith is the merit by which we have it ; which though I doubt not but may passe with a favourable construction , yet are higher titles of Honour then any of our Divines do give unto her in pleading for Conditions in the Covenant . Your next Author was Peter Martyr , his Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans I have ; where I meet with that common place , De Justificatione , in it the passage you cite ; viz. d We deny that the Testament of God concerning the remission of sins in Christ , hath a condition annnexed to it . But first , I conceive , that Martyr here denies only a condition of Works , or a Legal condition . Such legal conditions Pighius did plead for . And that these are the conditions which Martyr doth deny , his owne words in the very same page do clearly expresse . For having in the line next after the passage you quote out of him , alledged that of the Apostle at large , Gal. 5. 15 , 16 , 17. hee presently from this Testimony drawes this inference , as an Explication of his former negation of conditions in the Testaments , Haec verba clarissimè docent ; These words do most clearly teach , that the Testament which God made with Abraham , was pure and absolute ; et sine ulla legali conditione , and without any legal condition . But that he should deny the condition of faith , or that faith was required to Justification , that common place shewes not , but rather the contrary ; for about some leaves after , speaking of that , Rom. 4. It shall be imputed to us , as it was to Abraham , if we believe ; he thus saith , e Is it not here clearly enough said , That we must believe , that that Jesus Christ whom God raised againe , died and rose again , that we might be justified , and that all our sins might be forgiven us ? And a little after ; f Every one that seeth the Son and believeth on him , hath eternal life . Thus therefore we infer , But I believe on the Son of God , therefore I now have , and shall have that which he hath promised . g Vnlesse faith be wanting wher by we may apprehend the things offered , we are justified by the Promises . Martyr in that common place reasons wholly against Justification by works . And the condition there spoken of , unlesse we will do apparent injury to the Author , we must understand the condition of works , or of the Law , which both there , and in this eleventh Argument he excludes , both from the Covenant with Abraham , and the work of Justification . 2. Let but Martyr expound himself , and then it will appear what conditions he denies , and in what manner ; nor shall I lead you any further for discovery of this , then this his Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans . Look then Chap. 10 on those words , For righteousnesse to every one that believeth ; and you shall find the difference betweene the Law and the Gospel , thus set down by him . h The Law is received by doing , and most exact performing that which is commanded : But the Gospel by a lively and efficacious assent of faith . Moses also Deut. 30. writeth concerning the Law , that hee had set before the people life and death ; manifestly teaching that if the Law be received and fulfilled , it will bring eternal life with it : But seeing we are shut out from this benefit , the merciful God hath provided another word , to wit of faith ; which if by assenting to it , it be received , bringeth life along with it . From this place it appeareth , that the promises of the Law were given from the supposition or condition of Works going before . But in the Gospel , if works are annexed to the Promises , they are not so to be understood , as either the merit or causes of those Promises . But we must thus conclude , That these gifts of God which are promised , follow after the works , though they be not perfect and absolute as they are commanded in the Law. This place , ( I hope ) will shew that Peter Martyr was only against the condition of Works , and there too against their merit or efficiency ; for as for their presence , he allowes that they are required in the Gospel . But as as for the condition of faith , he is not at all against it . Turne to one place more , Rom. 8. If we suffer with him , &c. Where setting down the differences between the Promises of the Law and of the Gospel , he saith , i They do not differ in this , ( as some think ) that the Promises Evangelical have no conditions annexed ; but the Legal Promises are never offered without conditions ; for as it s said , Honour thy Father and thy mother , that thou maist live long upon the earth . And if ye be willing and obedient ye shall eat the good of the Land. So we read also in the Gospel , Forgive , and it shall be forgiven ; give , and it shall be given , &c. Wherefore seeing this is not the difference , we must seek out some other . It appeareth therefore to him that diligently considereth , that the conditions of the Law might bee causes of the obtainment of the rewards promised : for if they had been perfect and absolute , as the Law required them , they might be compared with the rewards themselves , and had also had esteem of merit ; but seeing these cannot be performed by men . God of his mercy gave in their stead Evangelical Promises , which although they have conditions added , yet are offered freely . Wherefore if thou joyne these three things together , that the Evangelical rewards are promised freely , that the conditions cannot be compared unto , or equalized with them , that the Promises must be most firme , and take away the account of merit , you may see wherein these differ from those of the Law. And thus I hope it is manifest , that they were conditions of Works which Peter Martyr did deny ; that he did not deny them simply neither , but only as meritorious and causal of the benefits promised ; that he held faith to be the Requisite or the Condition of the Gospel . So that you must give me leave to take Martyr from you too , and put him down with the forenamed Authors , for a patron of our Cause . 3. Next unto Peter Martyr , you cite Olevian , but whether with any more advantage to your Cause then the former , or disadvantage to us , is the businesse of our present enquiry . If you please with second thoughts ( which are most commonly the best ) to look into him , you shall find that when he denies conditions in the Covenant , they are only such as , first , are performed by and proceeding from our own strength ; which we with him do acknowledg to be none , and therefore also deny the same . 2. Which arise from , or carry along with them a consideration of dignity , or worthinesse in our selves . 3. Are of a meritorious nature . Such conditions as these , we together with him disclaim . That these are the conditions which he doth deny , is so clear and plain , that he which runs may read . If you begin with his definition of the Covenant of Grace , you shall find him in the close thereof expressing himself thus ; k Without the condition or stipulation of any good thoughts from their own strength . Having spoken concerning God , who makes the Covenant , he comes afterward to consider the persons with whom this Covenant is made , and shewes that the very Elect themselves to whom it doth especially belong , are by nature children of wrath , dead in sins , such whose hearts are hearts of stone , unable to think a good thought of themselves , meer darknesse , enemies to God , slaves to sinne and Satan : l Now forasmuch as they are such , God ( saith he ) promiseth he will not make any such Covenant with them , which in the least part thereof should be founded on their own strength to perform it . m Wherefore lest the Covenant should fail and be of none effect , men being miserable , dead in sins , having hearts of stone , such as are not subject to the Law of God , neither in deed can be , Rom. 8. Who are not able of themselves to think any thought that is good : but that it may remain firm and everlasting , he promiseth such a Covenant , the whole essence whereof doth depend on himself alone , and is founded in his Son Jesus Christ . — He promiseth also such a manner of executing in us this his decree and purpose , the strength and efficacy whereof doth not proceed from corrupt man , but from himself alone . A little after , he sums up all that he had said concerning the nature and substance of the Covenant , thus , Wherefore , if you look upon God , the efficient cause , and those to whom he promiseth the Covenant ; or if you consider the matter and form thereof , you shall still find it is a Covenant of free grace , and that it doth not n Depend on any condition of our worthinesse , merits , or our proper strength . — The most merciful God did see the promise would be vain in respect of our vanity , which should depend on the condition of our own strength . What here he doth deliver so plainly , and in such expresse termes , you may ( if you please to look into him ) find him afterwards o repeating againe and again . Sir , By these passages you may see you have not gained any thing by Olevian , nor your Adversaries lost by what he speaks against conditions in the Covenant . Now that you may further see , that he speaks rather on their side whom you oppose , then for you ; I shall intreat you to consider some other passages in him . 1. He tells us that in this Covenant there is , and must be a mutual consent between God and us , yea , a consent testified by both parties : for immediately after his definition of the Covenant in the substance of it ( which wee mentioned before ) he comes to consider the administration of it , which he saith is dispersed by the Lord , by voice and visible signes , p In testimonium mutui consensus inter Deum & nos ; In testimony of this mutual consent which is between God and us . The same he doth elsewhere more largely repeat , as I shall shew you by and by . How both parties do give their consent in making the Covenant , he doth afterwards declare , and withal the freenesse of the Grace of God in both . q The whole substance of the Covenant ( saith he ) is free : In respect of God , he properly makes the Covenant with us , when he doth in our hearts by the Holy Spirit seal the Promise of free reconciliation offered in the Gospel , and beginneth our renovation to eternal life , doth daily carry it on , and at last doth perfect it . In respect of us who were dead in sins and trespasses , the Covenant is received when the Holy Ghost is freely given to us , whereby being raised from death to life , it comes to passe that we not only have a will and power to believe the Promise of free grace concerning reconciliation by Christ , and the renewing of us , that we may enter into the inheritaace of the heavenly Kingdome ; but also do believe or receive faith it self . So that the freenesse and absolutenesse of the Covenant doth not consist in this , that there is no condition or duty required on our parts , but none that is to be performed by our own strength ; as he some few lines after doth expresse himself . r Thus ( saith he ) it is certain , that this whole Covenant is meerly of free Grace , and doth not depend on any condition of our owne strength , but on the free mercy of God in Christ , apprehended by faith , which himself doth bestow ; The offer or tender of a double Promise in Christ , to wit , of the remission of sins , and sanctification , and so the donation of Christ himself , is , in respect of God , most free . The acceptation on our part is also free , because it is the action of God in us , whereby he doth seal the Promise to our hearts ; so that being acted by him , we do act ; being by him made Believers , we do believe ; and being quickned or created by Christ unto good works , we do walk in them . Thus far Olevian in that place : and who is there Sir , of these whom you oppose , that doth not say the same with him ? So that your quoting of him is at least to little purpose for your opinion : I might farther shew you , that he in another place , repeating the same thing , adds , ſ once and again , that God in giving faith to his Elect and chosen ones , doth thereby give with it to them also universam substantiam foederis , the whole substance of the Covenant . So that the remission of sin promised in the Covenant is not Antecedent but Consequent to faith ; which in effect is as much for the conditionality of faith in reference to the pardon of sin , & the salvation of souls , as is contended for by those whom you oppose ; but I will not insist on that . I shal , for your and the Readers better information and satisfaction touching the judgment of this learned Divine in this point , entreat you to observe . 2. That as he doth plead for a mutual consent of both parties in the Covenant ; So he doth withal maintaine , that when God for his part performes the federatory action ( as his phrase is ) Prius assensum à nobis stipulatur : he doth first require our assent to the Promises and Duties or Conditions of the Covenant . t Thus hee expresseth himself more then once , shewing withal , that this Position is most agreeable to the Scripture of the Old and New Testament ; alledging to this purpose , that voluntary and federal Contract betweene God and the people expressed by Moses ; Thou hast avouched the Lord this day to be thy God , and to walk in his wayes , and to keep his Statutes , and his Commandments , and his Judgments , and to hearken unto his voyce . And the Lord hath this day avouched thee to be his peculiar people as he hath promised thee . Deu. 26. 17 , 18. Setting down at large several Reasons why the Lord is pleased thus to proceed in the administration of his Covenant , and that in reference to both the Elect and Reprobate ; those which are sincere , and those which are but hypocritical professors of , and parties in the Covenant . So that if you lay all the passages of Olevian together , you may ( at least wise the indifferent Reader may ) see that you have gained nothing by him , nor have your Adversaries lost him . 4. Having dispatch'd Olevian , in the next place I turn to Zanchy , whom you alledg as being fully for you . And I confesse , at the first sight looking on him with a bare superficial glance , he doth seem wholly to be yours , especially if you pitch on one passage , and do not compare it with others in the same place . 'T is true , he doth affirm that God saith , Most absolutely without any condition of Faith and Repentance inserted , I will betroth thee to me for ever . But if you please seriously to weigh what he delivereth in his Commentary on the same Chapter , and compare one thing with another , you shall find , that 1. The absolutenesse which he speaks of lyeth in this , not that faith and repentance are not required on the Churches part to make up the match ; but that the making or dissolving of the Matrimonial federal Contract between the Lord and the Church shall not depend on any condition to be performed by the Church of her owne power and strength , for the Lord doth undertake even for the Church , to work in her Faith , Repentance and ●ll other Graces requisite to the making and perpetuating of the match , that it bee not broken ▪ so he speaks , and doth declare himself in the end of that very Paragraph , the beginning whereof you take hold of as serving , our turne . ſ God promiseth both a new Marriage , and also all things which even on the 〈…〉 are necessary for the making and confirming of● the Match . And more fully afterwards , t He promiseth , That he will cause that we shall be joyned to him in a perpetual mariage . But the mariage cannot be perpetual , unlesse as in God , so also there be in us Faith and the Spirit of Christ continuing to the end , by which this marriage is both contracted and preserved . Therefore he doth promise that faith and the Spirit of Christ shall continue in us . You may there at large see him assert , That there are connubi● leges , as he calls them , Lawes of the marriage , or conditions thereof which are to be observed by the Church for her part which God doth undertake to write in her heart , that so the marriage may be made and continued . And what doth Zanchy , I pray you , here say more , then any of those whom you oppose ? or who is there of those against whom you alledge him , that doth not assert the very same ? If you look back into his Commentary on the same Chapter and verse , you shall find him speaking the same thing , and explicating himself , in what sense he saith 't is a Promise without a Condition . u It is to be noted , ( saith he , explicating those words , I will betroth thee to me ) that this is a simple and Evangelical promise , without any condition ; for here God doth exact nothing ; ( to wit , to be done by their owne strength ) but doth simply promise what he himself will do to his Church ; so that he doth promise faith it selfe , without which the rest of the Promises can have no place in us . 2. You may observe , That when he saith , The Promise is made without any condition , his meaning is , without any Condition in us Antecedaneous , as a moving cause , inducing or inclining the Lord to enter into this Covenant , and to make this matrimonial Contract : all the cause thereof the Lord finds in , of , and from himself ; in which regard he prevents us , not we him . Thus he doth afterwards clearly expresse himself . w By that word , I wil betroth thee ; he doth give us to understand , that God is the Author of our Reconciliation , and consequently of our Salvation . He it is that doth first come to us and betroth us to himself . Wee do not prevent him , or seek him to be our husband ; but he preventeth us , that he may betroth us unto himself . 1 John 4. Not that wee loved him first , but he loved us first . Wo be to us , if God did not prevent us . Thus Zanchy , and what have you gained by him in this particular , or your opposites lost ? Do they not speak the same things ? and when they assert Conditions , yet deny them to be on our part antecedaneous , or any moving causes , acknowledging that all doth proceed from the meer good pleasure of God , according to the purpose which he purposed in himself , and that x he loveth his people with whom he makes the Covenant , because he loveth them , as Moses sometime said to Israel . 3. That in denying of Conditions , he doth deny conditions that are meritorious , and that the Covenant it self , as also the Promises are free without respect unto , or dependance on any thing that is of merit in us . Thus in the very next page setting down the substantial or essential heads of the Covenant , he delivereth his mind ; y The manner of making the Covenant , or of promising , is , that God of his free grace , without any merits of ours , doth make this Covenant with us , and it doth not depend on any merits of our own at all . And do not those whom you oppose , and think to strengthen your opposition against them by Zanchies Authority , produced and urged for you ; do not ( I say ) they speak the same thing with him in this particular ? Hitherto I shewed , that Zanchy is not so much for you , as you would make the world believe he is ; I shall now make it appear , that in the same place , however he doth not use the word Condition ( which yet he doth in other places ) yet he speaks the same thing for substance which they do against whom you alledg him . And that there are such conditions required on the Churches part as wee plead for , Consider with me to this purpose . 1. His explication of that phrase , I will betroth thee to me . z When God doth make a new Covenant with any people , he is said to betroth them to himself , because that by the bond of the Covenant he will unite himself to that people , and they are likewise joyned to God , as the Bridegroome is to the Bride , and the Bride to the Bridegroom , faith of the Marriage being given on both sides , or by both parties . And 2. His definition of the Covenant , which he doth afterwards largely insist on , setting down the chief and essential heads thereof . a The Covenant of God with man , ( saith he ) is mutua pactio , a mutual agreement between both parties ; wherein God of his meer grace , and for Christs sake , doth promise two things ; 1. That he will be a God to us , or receive us into his favour , pardoning all our sins for Christs sake , and impute his righteousnesse unto us . 2. That he wil bestow the Kingdom of Heaven on us for our inheritance ; And doth also require of man two things ; 1. Faith , 2. Obedience , that he order his life according to the pleasure of God : and both parties do by outward signes confirm Fidem sibi invicem datam . You may find the same thing delivered by him in the first and second Heads of the Covenant . And in the next page , The substance of the Covenant on Gods part , ( saith he ) is that which God of his free grace doth offer and promise us ; on our part , that which he doth require of us , and which we promise to perform , That we do embrace this reconciliation offered and promised , That we will be his people , &c. Now Sir , if you will be pleased to consider these several assertions of Zanchy , in this very place which you your self did quote , 1. Faith is that Grace which is on the Churches part necessary to make up the marriage Covenant between the Lord and her . 2. This grace the Lord doth promise absolutely to give , it being that grace without which the rest of the Promises have no place in us . 3. It is also our duty ; God doth in the Covenant command it , we promise to perform it . 4. It is that wherein , on our part , the substance of the Covenant doth consist . Lay them altogether , and you may clearly see here is an acknowledgment of the thing , faith is the condition of the Covenant , though he doth not give it the name . But to give you a further taste of him , that it may be out of all question that he doth assert conditions , both name and thing ; I shall only intreat you to peruse a one place more in him ; where he doth largely handle that great blessing and benefit of the Covenant , the remission of sins ; in the sixth place he comes to consider , On what condition it is offered and conferred ; and mentions three : 1. The first and chief , is the true and constant practice of Repentance . 2. Confession and acknowledgment of our offences to those whom we have injured and wronged . 3. A brotherly forgiving of those which have sinned against and offended us . Where he doth withal maintain , that b they are conditions not for which , but without which the remission of sins is not obtained ; denying them to be conditions meritorious . Therefore S. John saith , If we confess , behold the condition ; yet he doth not say , for our confession , he will forgive . Justification cannot be had without faith ; but we do not say , it is obtained for the worth of our faith ; but freely , or of free-grace . Moreover this is ( saith he ) to be noted , that even the very conditions which God requireth of us , are given to us by God : Therefore the remission of sins is not to be ascribed in any sort to our Merits , but to the grace of God alone . You have here Zanchy , speaking as fully and as plainly for Conditions , as any of those whose Doctrine you oppose , in which regard I must intreat you either to quit your claim to this Author , and leave him to stand on our side against you ; or else to change your mind and judgment , come over to us , and then Zanchy is yours when you are ours . 5 The Testimony of learned Junius is next produced by you , as that which seemes to be most for you of all the Authors ; and yet not so much as is pretended . The oration of his which you mention , I have not . In his Parallels he doth indeed make mention of it , c as that wherein he had proved , that the Hebrew word , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , oft time , in the Scriptures of the old Testament ; and the Latine word Foedus , both according to the Etymology and use thereof in classical Authors , are not restrained to those federal promises wherein there is a mutual stipulation between divers parties expressed , but for such declarations and dispositions as proceed from one alone , so that the Hebrew word might well be rendred by the Apostle , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . Now this is a thing which is not denied , but acknowledged and granted by those , which yet neverthelesse do assert a mutual stipulation , and conditions ( in that regard ) in the Covenant of Grace . So that if this be the scope and drift of that Oration , as it seems to be by his mentioning of it for this end and purpose ; it is alledged by you to little purpose , seeing it doth neither make for you , nor against us . In prosecution of this , which is the main drift of that Parallel , and as I conceive by his own citing of it , of the Oration also ; he adds , d That the grace of God is manifested much more clear to men , in that he doth not give a Covenant , but a Testament to those that are his : For the Covenant would have Conditions , which if either part do not perform , the Covenant is made void . But a Testament is an instrument of liberality and grace , without any condition ; by which men are called and appointed heirs , without respect to any duty which might proceed from them . By this passage of Junius you may take notice , who that Vir maximus is whom Dr. Ames cites , in that place of his Coronis , which is quoted by you . Now as for this place of Junius , we must either expound it of meritorious Conditions ( which those words , without respect to any duty , seem to intimate ; ) or of Conditions Legal , to be performed by our own strength , such as were in the Covenant of works : for Conditions Evangelical and not Meritorious , he doth in expresse termes aver in the new Covenant or Testament . e The substance ( saith he ) of either Testament , is one and the same , common in Jesus Christ ; and that consists of two parts ; as it was first manifested to Abraham , Gen. 17. and afterwards to his posterity ; the one containing the Promise , when God saith , I will be their God ; the other the condition added , wherein God requireth , that we should in like manner obey him , when he saith , And they shall be my people . And if you please to peruse the Chapter , out which the next Quotation in the Margent is cited at large , or the passage it selfe that is alledged , you shall finde him acknowledging , that the f Covenant of the Gospel hath its conditions annexed , as well as the Covenant of Works ; and withal such a condition , as to man in himselfe is impossible , though in regard of the Lords gracious promise , who doth undertake to work in his own Federates the very condition it selfe , 't is to them through power of his grace and efficacy of his Spirit , made profitable and easie ; where when he had fitly shewed the agreement between Moses , setting down the tenor and condition of the Covenant which God did make with Israel , ( besides the Covenant which he made with them at Horeb ) and S. Paul expressing the tenor of the Gospel , which is a declaration of the same Covenant of Grace which Moses mentioneth , he doth thus paraphrase those words of the Covenant , which both do expresse ; g The word is nigh thee , in thy mouth , and in thine heart ; i.e. This Commandment of faith which I declare is neither hidden , nor far off from thee , seeing God doth graciously put it into thy mouth , and into thy heart , if thou by faith wilt lay hold of it . Thus you have Junius against Junius , or rather Junius expounding himself , telling you in plain termes that he holds conditions in the New Covenant , which God of his free grace gives his Creature to perform . So that the former place , where he excludes conditions from the Covenant , must ( as I said before ) be understood of legal and meritorious conditions , which sort of conditions we shut out of the Covenant as well as he . 6. Leave we Junius , as much , if not more on our side then on yours , and come we to the next , Dr. Ames , ( for as for Estius and Lessius , though I value one , the former of them , yet I shall not look after them at present , not for that I doubt they are against me , but for that I care not much to have them for me , being by you upbraided already with joyning with Papists , though it seems you can your self accept of the patronage of Papists when you can get it . ) Come we , I say , to Dr. Ames : and I could willingly chide you for open fowle play in citing an Author expresly against his own words in the very place you cite out of him . Immediately before your very citation , Ames hath these words , h We grant that mans duty is required , maintaining this withal , that God by vertue of this promise will cause those that are his , that they shall perform the duty , as far forth as it is necessary to be done . And immediately after your Quotation ( which is verbatim the same with that Junius delivereth in his Parallel , where he mentions his Oration that you alledge , he doth thus expresse himself ; The whole disposition is after the manner of a Will and Testament , as it is considered simply , either in whole , or according to the part of it ; but if the benefits that are bequeathed , be compared within themselves , then one is to the other as it were a condition . And in this respect it is sometimes propounded after the manner of a Covenant : which manner of propounding is not so to be taken , as that it should in any part change the nature of a Testament . Our Divines are wont excellently to joyn both together , when they teach that righteousnesse and life are promised upon condition of faith , and that faith it self is given to the Elect , or that the condition of the Covenant is also promised in the Covenant . How plainly on both these places doth Dr. Ames expresse himselfe for that conditionality in the Covenant which we maintain ; and that in the same place whence you fetch your proof against us ? Was it for this , my good friend , that you took the paynes to write so much out of the Doctor ? and that you shewed me your written copy , and not the book when I was with you , lest if you had brought the book , the place it self should have spoken & answered for it selfe ? Whether this were the cause or no , I leave it to your conscience ; but assuredly your carriage in this and that other passage about Chamien , whom you would not take notice of to hold conditions proper ( though it followed immediately your allegation out of him ) until I read it to you , and then would not look upon it , nor hardly hear it , but put it off with saying , that he did eat his owne words . I say , these carriages make me and mine , and your dear friend who was with me , fear that your Opinion sticks more in your will then in your mind . Your eies and ears are open and ready to entertaine any Author , though a Popish one , that makes for your opinion ; but if he be against your Tenent , though he be never so godly , hardly have you patience to look upon him . Well ( Sir ) what hath now been , as also what was formerly alledged out of Dr. Ames , do abundantly prove him to have been for that conditionality of the Covenant we defend . 7. Passe we on to Doctor Preston , where againe you may be blamed , for when the Doctor laid down a distinction betweene the Covenants , or rather between the Promises of the same Covenant ; viz. the promise of Grace , which he calleth an absolute Covenant made with the Elect , Jer. 31. Ezek. 36. and the Promise of life which he cals a conditional Covenant made with all , If thou believe , thou shalt be saved . You run away with a piece , and put downe Dr. Preston for a defender of the absolutenesse of the Covenant , though both there , and in his Treatise of the Covenant ( of which I believe you were not ignorant ) he writes many leaves to the contrary . But I hope you will wipe this Author also out of your list , after I have rehearsed some passages unto you out of him . Look then either in that , or the Sermon foregoing ( for I have not the Book now by me ) and you shall find Dr. Preston asserting faith to be required , and that precedently to our being in Covenant : For thus he writes , That which is required of them is only , that they take it . And there is nothing precedently required or looked for on our parts , but taking and applying of it . So page 18 The taking of Christ makes Christ ours . — Faith is that whereby the right of Christ is made ours unto salvation . Pag 62 , 63 he tels us of the reconciling and justifying act of faith ; which , he saith is direct , and is that whereby we take Christ ; as well as of its pacifying act , which he calls reflex , and saith it is that whereby we know we take him : yea , he tells us , that Humiliation is required , not as a qualification : but as our sense of sicknesse is required to our seeking of cure , so this to our seeking of Christ , without which wee will never come to Christ . And would you know what this taking of Christ is , which he saith is precedently required ? He tells you toward the latter end of the first Sermon , that it is to know Christ rightly , as Prophet , Priest and King. — To obey him . — To forsake all other for him . — To pitch on him with our whole deliberate and sincere will. Moreover after this our receipt of him , We are ( saith he ) required to obey him , to be holy as he is holy , to forsake all ; which he calls after-clap conditions , and hard conditions . And pag. 25. Those that be humble and see Gods wrath what it is , that have their consciences awakened to see sin , will come in and be glad to have Christ , though on these conditions : but the other will not . If you will have Christ on these conditions , you may . But we preach in vain , all the world refuseth Christ , because they will not leave their Covetousnesse , Pride , &c. And all because they be not humbled . Now whereas he excludes conditions in some passages , he tells you in what sense he excludes them . Pag. 15. When we exclude all conditions , we exclude such a frame and habit of mind , which we think is necessarily required to make us worthy to take him . By which it appears clearly , they were meritorious conditions he excluded . To these I may add how in his Treatise of the New Covenant , page 217. he gives this for his fourth Reason , why uprightnesse is required ; viz. That there might be an integrity on both sides ; A Covenant , as on Gods part , so on ours : That as he promiseth he will be all-sufficient , so he requireth this again on our parts , That we be altogether his . And pag 357. That the Condition God required of Abraham was , that he should believe ; where he spends many leaves in shewing that , and why faith is the condition of the New Covenant , Page 389. That Repentance , the condition required of us , is part of the Covenant , both on Gods part and on ours . The condition that is required of us , as part of the Covenant , is the doing of this , the action . But the ability whereby we are able to perform these is a part of the Covenant on the Lords part . Pag. 398. That when we do believe , at that very hour we enter into Covenant , and are translated from death to life : And pag. 458. When the heart gives her full consent , and takes the Lord for her God and Governour , then is the Contract made up between them . These passages ( Sir ) abundantly satisfie me concerning that holy and reverend Author , that he held faith to be the grand condition of the Gospel , precedently required to , not only our knowing our selves in state of Grace , but our very being therein , and right thereto . If he say , that the Covenant , that is , one part of it , viz. the Promise of Grace , is absolute ; he saith no more then others , for I know none of our side that hold that part to be antecedently conditional . Some call it a Free , others an Absolute promise , others a Covenant with Christ for us , &c. Yea , in regard of the freenesse and absolutenesse of it , they grant the Covenant in respect of the Elect to be equivalent to an absolute Promise , and the purchase equivalent to an absolute purchase ( as you may see Owen Vniv . Redempt . lib. 3. c. 2. ) the conditions on which salvation is promised , being purchased and promised as well as the salvation . Notable are the expressions of Mr. Rutherford in this particular , k We teach faith a condition on our part , and also a grace promised : Christ brings himselfe , his righteousnesse , and the condition of faith too , which doth receive him . As if some Prince should freely promise to marry some maid of low estate , on condition she wear a gold chain , with a rich Jewel of the Crown in it , and withal should bind himself to give her both the chain and a will to wear it . Again , He is both without doors knocking , and within doors opening , yet he never cometh in , but upon condition we open , which condition is also his own work . He offers Righteousness so the sinner believe , and he works belief that the sinner may have Righteousnesse , pag. 109. Thus you see others as well as Dr. Preston , assert the absolutenesse of the Covenant in that part ; who yet still maintain the other part , viz. the promise of life and salvation to be conditional ; which as hath been already shewed , Dr. Preston doth maintain . 8. As for Mr. l Walker , he denies not all kinds of conditions in the place cited , but only Conditions Legal , and conditions for which ; meritorious ones : but conditions which are as a means by which the free gift is received , and as a qualification whereby one is made capable and fit to receive and enjoy the free gift ; such he granteth , and calleth them Conditions in the place cited by you ; saying , There is no condition of the Covenant propounded , but only the way and means to receive the blessing , or the quality and condition by which men are made capable and fit to enjoy the blessing : which is as much as I plead for under that Title . As for Mr. Strong , though both what I have heard from him my self , and also what I have heard from others who have seen his Sermon , induce me to believe that he is not against our conditions , yet having not his Sermon , I must be altogether silent at this time concerning him . By this ( Sir ) you may see , that I have looked into the most of the Authors which you cited , and amongst them all I must professe unto you , that I find not one that speaketh fully for you , but more against , then for your Tenent : and for that sort of conditions , whose cause I plead , I must intreat you therefore to shake hands with them , and leave them to stand on my side . To them I shall add some few more . 1 Mr. Perkins shall be the first , who puts down conditions in the very description of the Covenant , saying , m The Covenant of Grace is that , whereby God freely promising Christ and his benefits , exacteth again of man that he would receive Christ by faith , and repent of his sins . In the Covenant of Grace two things ( n saith he elsewhere ) must be considered the substance thereof , and the condition . The Substance of the Covenant is , that Righteousnesse and life everlasting is given to Gods Church and people by Christ . The Condition is , that we for our parts are by faith to receive the foresaid benefits , and this condition is by grace as well as the substance . 2. Mr. Reynolds shall be the next ; in his Treatise of the Life of Christ , p. 399. he calls Faith the conveyance : and p. 403. We expect Justification by faith in Christ . — Faith unites us to Christ , and makes his death , merit , life , kingdom , sonship , victory , benefits to become ours . You may see p. 451 , 452 , 453. That to marriage between Christ and his Church , whereby the Church hath a right and propriety created , to the Body , Name , Goods , Table , Possession , and Purchases of Christ , — is essentially required consent , which consent must be mutual ; for though Christ declare his good will when he knocketh at our doors , yet if we keep at distance , stop our ears at his invitations , there is then no Covenant made . It is but a wooing , and no marriage , &c. Pag. 465 , 466 , 467. That the office of Faith is to unite to Christ , and give possession of him , till which union by Faith be made , we remain poor and miserable , notwithstanding the fulness that is in Christ . Pag. 478 , 479. and to name no more , pag. 512. setting down the difference between the two Covenants , he saith , They differ in the Conditions , for in the old Covenant , legal obedience ; but in the new Faith only is required , and the certain consequent thereof Repentance . 3. Mr. Ball shall be the third , who saith , o The Covenant of Grace doth not exclude all conditions , but such as will not stand with grace : and pag. 18. The stipulation required , is , that we take God to be our God ; that is , that wee repent of our sins , believe the Promises of mercy , and embrace them with the whole heart , and yeild love , fear , reverence , worship , and obedience to him according to the prescript rule of his Word : and p. 20. If then we speak of Conditions , by conditions we understand whatsoever is required on our part , as precedent , concomitant , or subsequent to Justification . Repentance , Faith and Obedience , are all conditions . But if by conditions we understand what is required on our part , as the cause of that God promised , though only instrumental , Faith or belief in the Promises of free mercy is the only condition . 4. Let learned Pemble be the fourth , who speaking of the difference between the Law and the Gospel , saith , p The diversity is this , The Law offers life unto man upon condition of perfect obedience , cursing the transgressors thereof in the least kind with eternal death . The Gospel offers life unto man upon another condition , viz. Repentance and Faith in Christ , promising remission of sin to such as repent and believe . That this is the main essential difference between the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace , we shall endeavor to make good against the Romish Apostacy . And about a leaf after , Hence we conclude firmly , that the difference between the Law and the Gospel assigned by our Divines , is most certain and agreeable to the Scriptures , viz. That the Law gives life unto the Just upon condition of perfect obedience in all things : The Gospel gives life unto sinners , upon condition they repent and believe in Christ Jesus . Where you may take notice , that he layes it down not as his own private opinion , but as the general Tenent of all the Orthodox Divines in his time , and that in opposition to our Popish Adversaries . It was then no Popery to hold conditions in the Covenant : and as he of the Divines of his time , so may I of the Divines of this present age . See their consent and harmony herein , Larg . cat . p. 9. 5. Doctor Downam shall be the fifth ; q That which is the only condition of the Covenant of Grace , by that alone we are justified . But Faith is the only condition of the Covenant of Grace , which is therefore called , Lex fidei . And l. 7. c. 2. Sect. 6. Our Writers distinguishing the two Covenants of God , that is , the Law and the Gospel , whereof the one is the Covenant of Works , the other is the Covenant of Grace , do teach that the Law of Works is that which to Justification requireth Works as the condition thereof . The Law of Faith , that which to Justification requireth faith as the condition thereof . The former saith , Do this and thou shalt live ; the latter , Believe in Christ and thou shalt be saved . 6. Doctor Davenant doth also fully expresse himselfe several times to the like purpose , and may in the sixth place be added to the former . His words are these : r In the Covenant of the Gospel it is otherwise ; for in this Covenant , to the obtainment of reconciliation , Justification , and life eternal , there is no other condition required then of true and lively faith ; God so loved the world , John 3. 16. Therefore Justification , and the right to eternal life doth depend on the condition of faith alone . Where he doth afterward thus briefly shew the difference betweene the Law and the Gospel , considered as two distinct Covenants ; ſ The Law ( saith he ) hath the very strength and form of a Covenant made in the condition of Works . But the Gospel placeth the very strength and form of a Covenant , made in the blood of the Mediator apprehended by faith . What can be said more expresly then this ? I will not trouble you with repeating what hath been already delivered out of him in his next Chapter , but only mention one passage or two out of him : s The Promise of eternal life according to the Covenant of the Gospel , and of Grace , doth depend on the condition of faith . A little before , explicating in what sense we deny good works to be required as conditions of Salvation , he thus speaks , If by conditions of salvation , we understand the conditions of the Covenant , whereby we are received into the favor of God , and to the right of eternal life : for these depend on the only condition of faith apprehending Christ the Mediator . 7. With the fore mentioned Divines doth the learned t Cameron fully agree , who handling the agreement and differences of the Covenant of Nature and of Grace , observes they both agree in the extrinsecal form , that to each there is annexed a restipulation , though in the thing it self required in each by way of stipulation , they differ ; for that in the Covenant of Nature , natural Righteousnesse is required ; but in the Covenant of Grace faith alone is required . Whereupon in the conclusion of his whole Discourse concerning that Subject , he gives this definition of the Covenant of Grace ; It is u that wherein God on the Condition of faith in Christ proposed , doth promise the remission of sins in his blood , and life everlasting in heaven , and that for this end , that he might shew the riches of his mercy . 8. Unto these I may add Paraeus , who observes that the Apostle doth make mention of faith , that v he may teach us , fidem esse conditionem , that faith is the condition under which Christ is given unto us , as the propitiation for sins , and that it is the Instrumental cause by which alone we obtain the propitiation in Christ . And elsewhere setting down the difference between the righteousness of the Law , and of faith , or of the Gospel . He saith , w By that no man doth obtaine life , because the condition of doing all things required by the Law is not possible to any besides Christ . It is easie to obtaine the fruit , and reape life by this , because the condition of confessing the Lord Jesus , and believing his Resurrection , is nigh in the mouth , and in the heart . 9 The learned Chamier , that great Assertor of the truth of God against the Romish corrupters of it , is the next . x He disputing with Bellarmine concerning the difference between the Law , and the Gospel , speaks as fully and plainly as any of the rest forenamed Protestant Divines , That the Law of Works doth propose salvation upon condition of fulfilling the Law. But the Law of Faith doth propose it upon condition only of believing in Christ ; the word condition being taken in the same sense in both sides . And having distinguished conditions that are in Contracts and Covenants , that some are precedent , others are consequent ; the former being such as are essential to the Contract or Covenant ; yea , constituting the very essence and foundation of it . The other being such , the defect or want whereof doth make the Contract or Covenant to be void and of none effect , though they do not make the Covenant and Contract it self . He doth apply it to his present Subject , The Law of Works requireth the fulfilling of the Law as a condition antecedent , without which any man hath not , either the actual possession of , nor so much as a right to eternal life . The Law of faith doth not admit works as such a condition antecedent , but only consequent , so that they are necessary , ex vi donatae jam propter fidem vitae , by vertue of that right to eternal life , which is already conferred on them through faith ; Where you see Chamier doth clearly assert Faith to be the condition by which we doe receive the right to life , given us by grace ; Works the condition consequent in the Covenant of Grace . 10. Mr. Bayn on the Ephesians , Remission of sin is communicated from Christ in manner following . 1 Christ sendeth his Ministers , as Legats , with the word of reconciliation or pardon , inviting them to believe on him , that they may receive forgivenesse of sins . 2. He doth work together by his Spirit , making those who are his children , believe on him , if they may find forgivenesse in him . 3 He doth communicate to them the forgivenesse which himselfe had procured and obtained for them . And on that fourth verse , God doth not bind any directly and immediately to believe salvation but in a certain order , for he binds them first to believe on Christ to Salvation , and then brings them in Christ to believe that hee loved them , and gave himselfe for them . 11. Mr. Burroughes upon Hosea , upon those words , I will betroth them unto me ; how frequently hath he those words , It must be mutual , it must be mutual in every particular branch of it . He shewes it must be mutual on the Churches part , as well as on Gods part ; and how can it be so without stipulation . In Moses his self-denial . p. 188. Faith hath the greatest honour above all other Graces to be the condition of the Covenant . 12. Last of all , it is the general Tenent of our brethren in New England , as appears by Mr. Bulkly of the Covenant . pag. 280 , 281. where he handles that very Question . And also by the Catalogue of Errors that did arise there , and were condemned by an Assembly at the Church of New Town , August 31. 1637. attested by Mr. Weldes , Err. 27. It is incompatible to the Covenant of Grace to joyne Faith thereunto . Err. 28. To affirm there must be faith on mans part to receive the Covenant , is to undermine Christ . Er. 37. We are completely united to Christ , before , or without any faith wrought in us by the Spirit , Err. 38. There can be no true closing with Christ in a Promise that hath a Qualification or a condition expressed , Err. 82. Where faith is held forth by the Ministers as the condition of the Covenant of Grace on mans part , as Justification by Sanctification , and the acting of faith , in that Church there is not sufficiency of bread . By condemning these opinions for Errors , they declare their judgments to be for conditions in the Covenant . You see ( Sir ) with what a cloud of witnesses we are compassed , and how the stream of Protestant and true Religion hath run in this channel : certainly , it should be some more then ordinary cause that should make us run counter to so many grave , learned , and godly Authors . Well , let us see what moves you to dissent . First , Many of them confesse it to be conditions improperly . Secondly , Many are driven to eat their own words . Now if both these were true , would they be of moment to make you dissent from your godly brethren ? Is propriety of speech such a Jewel , that for the preservation of it the good names of the godly and orthodox Divines , and the peace of the Church must be said to stake ? But who ( my good friend ) shall be judge of this propriety ? Certainly , if it shall continue for language that was in the Doctors time , you will be cast ; for I am sure conditions in the Covenant hath been , and is the language most in use among the Orthodox . I remember when I had some conference with you in your Committee house about your Sermon , you told me , Pemble was for you , and Chamier for you , and all Polemick Writers were for you : and now the contrary proves true , and they are brought against you , now they speak improperly , and are sometimes forc'd to eat their words . I am sure you speak not properly when you told me that they balked the word Condition . But proceed we to the other Grounds . You go on and tell us , that another thing that causeth your distance was , the vigilancy of the Adversary , who was ready to make use of such expressions for defence of their Tenents . This I confesse is of more weight then the former , for we should be careful that we minister not the least advantage to the Adversary . Bishop Davenant , as hath been heard already , would not have us in conference with Papists , use such speeches as these , That Works are necessary , and the like , because they will be apt to understand merit by them : yet neverthelesse that reverend Author doth use the word Condition , and very frequently : it seems he thought there was no such peril in the use of it . Again , the adversaries you speak of , must be either Papists or Arminians . Now as for Papists , you have delivered us from all fear that way , by telling us they stand not for any merit in the preparations they plead for ; now if they took any advantage from the word Condition , it would be to approve of merit . As for Armininas , they may take as much advantage from all Commands , Calls , and Counsels to Faith and Repentance to prove their free will , as from conditions : So then these also must be laid aside . Besides , if there were danger in the expression , can it not be qualified , so as that neither Papists nor Arminians may take any ground therefrom for the spreading of their Errors ? must it needs be wholly cast away ? Moreover , is there not as great a care to be had of Antinomians and Libertines , with whom our English Church begins to be pestred ? and may not these spiders increase their venome on your own gay flowers of absolute freenesse , to the poysoning of the power of godlinesse , both in their own and other mens conversations ? May they not say , Seeing no conditions are required , nothing on our part is to be done , I may live as I list , for I cannot break the Covenant ? Sir , This is an inference not onely may be made , but hath been made by too many in these loose times . I have heard sad stories of it whilst I lived in London ; I have knowne the persons there that have cast off Sabbaths , Duties , Ordinances , with this inference : and scoft at the followers of them ; calling them , Duty-mongers , Men of an Old Testament spirit , and the like . You cannot be ignorant that such a horrid inference is practically made from that Doctrine : And however you may think you have a salve for it in your thoughts ( which how sollid it may be I much question ) yet how can you remedy it in the hearts and lives of others ? Oh do not destroy by one Sermon more then you can build by ten . But last of all , that that most moveth you is your compassion to vulgar hearers , who hearing of conditions , take not hold on the Promise because they have not the condition . Now here , in the bowels of this compassion , I do beseech you to consider what you do , and tell me seriously , Dare you bid a sinner , whilst he goes on impenitently in his evil way , never repenting of it , nor turning from it , nor looking after Christ ; dare you ( I say ) offer such a wretch the precious blood of our blessed Saviour ? And dare you bid such a one , continuing such , to lay hold on the promise of mercy ? Dare you tell him , That the Gospel belongs unto him even while he is such ? Dare you say , Here Drunkard , Swearer , Whore master , here is salvation for thee , here is a Christ for thee , here is life for thee , though thou go on in thy swearing , drinking , whoring ; Salvation is thine , take it , assure thy self of it , it is thine ? If you do , fare you well . I dare not , lest I strengthen the hands of the wicked ; Old and New Testament are both against it . But if your meaning be , that such a sinner should alter his mind , leave his course , repent him of his evil way , give up himself wholly to Christ , and then , though never so foul , here was water to cleanse him , and bloud to purge him , mercy to pardon him , and a Christ to justifie him . If your meaning ( I say ) be this , what do you but hold out mercy conditional , even as we do , and to what end have you raised all this dust and stir ? To conclude , The peace of the Church , and edification of souls should be most dear unto us ; things wee should both preach and pray , study and labour for , and by all means possible endeavour to procure , preserve , and propagate . Now I do beseech you ( my dear brother ) seriously and sadly to consider , whether your present Tenent , and the broaching of it , doth not make a disturbance in the one , and a stop and hinderance in the other ? My heart akes to think of the late stirs in the New England Churches , occasioned by Master Wheel-write , Master Hutchison , and their followers , especially when I consider , that this very Tenent , No Condition in the Covenant , had a great influence thereon , if it were not the maine cause thereof . For here began they to look upon all those faithful Ministers of Christ , who maintained conditions , as no Preachers of free Grace , no Gospel Ministers , Legal Teachers , not yet acquainted with the Gospel Covenant , not able to give sufficient bread to their people , as appears by the examinations of Master Hutchison , and others in the book fore mentioned . Thereupon they fell to a neglect of their Sermons , contempt of the publick Ordinances , siding and faction , till in the end , for troubling of the Church her peace , they were some of the chief of them cut off and banished . May not ( my dear brother ) the like use be made of your present Doctrine ? Yea , is it not ( think you ) already made by divers ? Are not the hearts of many taken off thereby from their faithful Ministers and Pastors whom before they loved , prized , hearkened to , received good from , yea haply received their conversion by ( if they be indeed converted ? ) are not ( I say ) their hearts taken off from these their spiritual Fathers , so that they neglect their Sermons , contemne their counsels , call them , nick-name them Legal Teachers , and Ministers of the Old Testament ? when yet I hope you your selfe cannot in your conscience but acknowledg them for the true Ambassadors of the Lord Jesus . May not this ill issue of your Doctrine lye heavy on your spirits ? Again , may not the Writings of Pemble , Preston , Perkins , and other our Worthies now with God , for their holding of Conditions , and professing the conditions of Faith and Repentance , as without which we cannot have life , be laid aside and neglected ? Nay , are not these Authors themselves contemned as men of darker times , and not acquainted with such cleare light as now shineth , though you know there is more of the power and marrow of Christianity in one of their pages then in ten leaves of your new lighted Meteors ? Beside , are not many of the godly who love you , and were hearers of you , driven from your Lectures , or at least cannot come to them without fear and jealousie ? others thereby amazed , not knowing whom to follow ? and most called away from the practice of Religion , to that needlesse disquisition of a curious speculation ? When he builders clash , the Building must needs be interrupted ; and when the Witnesses disagree , the Jurors can bring in little better then an Ignoramus in their Bill . I do beseech you ( Sir ) to consider how by this your Tenent the names and Doctrine of Gods faithful Ministers , dead and living , are aspersed , the minds of the godly troubled , the peace of the Church disquieted , the hands of the wicked strengthened , the mouthes of the Adversaryes opened , and the hearts of your friends exceedingly sadded ; * and to draw back your foot before you are gone too far . By the wicket of an interpretative absolutenesse , I should hope that you might yet recover your self in safety ; however , by the door of retractation I am sure you may : and though that work be an unpleasing businesse to flesh and blood , yet is it one of the noblest Offices of a Christian souldier , in which spiritual warfare , as well as in temporal , as much honour may be gained by a good Retreat , as by a couragious Incounter , or prosperous Victory . FINIS . PAULS SAD FAREVVEL TO HIS EPHESIANS . OPENED IN A SERMON At the FUNERAL of Mr. JOHN GRAILE , Minister of TIDWORTH in the Country of WILTS . By HUMPHREY CHAMBERS , D. D. And Minister of the Gospel at Peusie in the same County . Praelucendo periit . He was a burning and a shining light , John 5. 35. The Righteous perish and no man layeth it to heart , and merciful men are taken away none considering that the righteous is taken away from the evil to come . Isai . 57. 1. London , Printed for Math. Keinton , at the Fountain in Pauls Church Yard . 1655 A Funeral Sermon . COncerning the very sad occasion of our present meeting , there is no need that I speak unto you , seeing it is , or may be knowne unto you all , that we have at this time accompanied , though not a very aged , yet an able , faithful , painful , and godly Minister of Jesus Christ unto his grave , that house prepared for all the living , where , as to his body , he is to rest until that great day , when all that are in their graves , shall hear the voice of the Son of God , and shall come forth , they that have done good to the Resurrection of life , they that have done evil to the Resurrection of damnation : at what time the faithful Ministers of Jesus Christ , how much soever contemned , clouded and cloathed with reproach in this world , who have fed the stock of God , taking the oversight thereof not by constraint , but willingly , not for filthy lucre , but of a ready mind ; neither as being Lords over Gods heritage , but being example : to the flock , when the chief Shepherd shall appear , they also shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away . Yea , they shall then , together with all other Gods servants , enter in all fulnesse into the joy of their Lord , and be possessed of an inheritance incorruptible and undefiled , that fadeth not away , reserved in heaven for them . The Holy Ghost tels us in Eccl. 7. 11. That a good name is better then precious ointment ; with that rich Embalming is our dear Brother gone unto his grave , which will make his memory sweet and precious enough to all that knew him , and love God. And of such a one , who is buryed with this sweet Odour the Holy Ghost witnesseth in the end of that verse , That the day of death is better then the day of birth . The day of Birth brings every one to an afflicted dying life , but the day of death bringeth every such one , yea every child of God to an everlasting life of never dying glory . Whether you that are the Inhabitants of this place were sensible of your blessing in the enjoying the Ministry of this our deceased Brother , or are apprehensive of your losse in his departure from you , I cannot say , ( for you are all strangers unto me ; ) but this I am sure of concerning very many , who have occasionally enjoyed the fruit of his Labours , that they sadly bewail the removing of one so furnished with skil and will to declare the truth of God , and to oppose the old Superstitious , and new , or rather renewed Errors which on the right , and left hand do oppose the Progress of a blessed Reformation amongst us . And upon this Account my heart greatly mourneth over this brother of ours whom God hath taken away from us , by whose death a great breach is made amongst us of the Ministry in these parts at this time , wherein open profanenesse and pernicious Errours do so much abound . When wee consider our Brothers Ministerial Qualifications and Graces , his Ability and Humility embracing and beautifying each other ; his conscionable and Christian circumspection over himselfe and his Doctrine , it is very doubtful whether he were more ripe for life , or fit for death : Questionlesse this our Brother after he had notice of deaths approach towards him , could not but be sensible of the Apostle Pauls strait , between a desire of living to do good to others , and dying to receive good for himselfe ; of serving the Lord Christ in life , and possessing the Lord Christ more fully in death : yet I am confident , that in this case he did prostrate himself obedientially at the feet of the will of God. And seeing the Lord hath now declared his purpose to make this our dear Brothers gain our losse , we must likewise submit without murmuring and repining , and say , The will of the Lord be done . But though we are thus to quiet our selves in the will of God , and to part with our Brother in all humble submission thereunto , yet are we not to part with him without sense of , and sorrow for ours and the Churches damage in his removal from us . Indeed , there is no cause why we should mourn as men without hope of , and comfort in the blessednesse of this our Brother , who now sleeps in Christ , and enjoyeth his presence , yet there is cause and warrant too to mourne as Christians , that so precious an instrument of good in the Church of God is taken from us . And that it may appear that wee have Scripture warrant for such our mourning at this time , I shall speak something through Gods strength , from a Scripture which upon this sad occasion the Lord hath guided my Meditations unto , which we find in Acts 20. 37 , 38. ACTS 20. 37 , 38. And they all wept sore , and fell on Pauls neck and kissed him . Sorrowing most of all for the words which he spake , That they should see his face no more , and they accompanied him unto the Ship. THese words are a History of the mournful parting of the Apostle Paul , and the Elders of the Church of Ephesus , together with many other faithful Brethren , when Paul took his final farewel of them , and left them hopelesse of ever seeing his face again . I will not hold you long in the Entry to my Text : We may take notice that the Apostle Paul preached the Gospel for the space of two years in Ephesus , with much diligence and happy successe , till he was by the violence of furious enemies driven out thence , as we have it at large related in chap. 19. And being to depart from Ephesus , he called unto him the Disciples , and confirmed their hearts in the truth which they had received , and embracing them , departed from them , as appeares in ver . 1. of this twentieth Chapter . After this having bin in Macedonia , and made his abode in Greece for three months , he resolved upon a speedy Journey to Jerusalem , and made haste thitherward by the way of Ephesus , that if it were possible he might be there on the Day of Pentecost , which was then at hand , ver . 16 , In prosecution of which resolution , he came to Miletus , and from thence sent to Ephesus , and called the Elders of the Church that he might speak with them , and encourage them in that great work that God had called them unto , ver . 17. And when they were come , the Apostle , not in a way of carnal ostentation , but that he might be looked upon as a leading President to other Messengers of the Gospel , set forth his owne diligence and fidelity in preaching the Word of God , ver . 18 , 19 , 20 , 21. And ver . 22 , 23 , 24. he shewed that God had acquainted him with many afflictions which would befal him for the future in the discharge of his duty , all which he made very light of in comparison to the joyous accomplishment of his course and Ministry received from the Lord Jesus . After this the Apostle told the Ephesians , that he knew that this present parting would be his final parting with them in the flesh , ver . 25. and thereupon he appealed to their consciences concerning his diligent , full , and faithful dispensing of the Word and Counsel of God amongst them for the effecting what in him was , the salvation of all , ver . 26 , 27. then from ver . 28. to the end of ver . 31. there is a very solemn charge given by the Apostle Paul to the Elders of Ephesus to look to themselves , and to the dear bought flock of God , over which the Holy Ghost had made them Overseers , to feed them with the Word of Truth , and defend them , what they might , from those Wolvish Seducers , who rising up amongst them , should make purlyes , and seek to engrosse and draw away Disciples after them , so disturbing , and what in them lay , destroying the Peace and Unity of the Church of God. Having finished this charge , the Apostle commended them to God and the Word of his Grace for their farther edification to eternal life , ver . 32. And then protesting his freedom from the sin of Covetousnesse , and withal his known endeavour to avoid the very appearance of it , ver . 33 , 34 , 35. he concluded all that he spake unto them with prayer , ver . 36. and when prayer was ended , the Apostle and the Ephesians in a most affectionate mournful manner parted each from other , as the words of my Text give us a relation thereof , And they all wept sore , &c. In these words we are to consider , 1. The occasion of that sad mourning of the Elders of Ephesus , and other Believers mentioned in the Text ; scil . the Apostle Pauls final departing from them , according as he told them , that they should see his face no more . But these words of the Apostle must be understood with a due restriction or limitation to this present world . The Apostle did not at all doubt whether this should be a final parting between him and his believing Converts of Ephesus for ever ; he knew well there should be a happy time of meeting for them again , as we may be assured from his own words to the Thessalonians . For what is our hope , or joy , or crown of rejoycing ? Are not even ye in the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ at his coming ? For ye are our glory and our joy . These words of the Apostle inform us , that he knew that no earthly parting should be absolutely a final parting betwixt him and other Believers , when as he looked beyond this world to the coming of the Lord Jesus ; but in respect of his personal presence with the Ephesians , to counsel , instruct , and comfort them , as he had done in the wayes of God , so the Apostle told them , that they should see his face no more , and when they were apprehensive thereof , they wept . 2. The description of the mourning of the Elders of Ephesus , and other believers at their parting from the Apostle ; which is laid down in three particulars . 1. The greatnesse of it , They wept sore . 2. The generality of it , they were not some weak hearted ones alone who were the mourners at this parting , but this was a great universal mourning of all that were present , They all wept sore . 3. The pathetick expressions of affection which the believing Ephesians used towards the Apostle Paul in this mourning , at their parting from him , They fell on his neck and kissed him ; and went as far as possibly they could with him , till earth and sea necessitated their parting , They accompanied him to the Ship. I purpose at this time to gather up the sum of all these Particulars , and give it unto you in one Doctrinal Observation , easily arising from the words of the Text ; viz That A faithful Minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ is enjoyed with much love , and finally parted from with much sorrow by those who truly believe the Gospel . The sorrow here recorded of the Elders of Ephesus and other Believers for the final parting of the Apostle from them , was not under any other notion , but as he was a faithful Minister of Jesus Christ unto them , so they loved him whilst they enjoyed him , so they mourned over him when he was going from them . Ministerial faithfulnesse admitteth of degrees in those in whom it is in truth . Amongst the Ministers of the Gospel in our dayes such as attain the measure of the Apostle Pauls faithfulnesse , are , I say not rarely , but ( as I conceive ) not at all to be found . How beit , I doubt not but that through Gods grace there are some Ministers of the Gospel in our dayes , the desire of whose soul is , that they may be faithful , and who do actually attain to some degrees of faithfulnesse in the Ministry which they have received from the Lord Jesus , and shall therefore be inabled to give up the account of their Stewardship with comfort and approbation , to him their great Lord at his appearing and Kingdom . I intend through Gods assistance , in order to the opening of the Doctrine now before us , in the first place to discover when a man may be a faithful Minister of Jesus Christ . A man may be said to be a faithful Minister of Jesus Christ , 1 First , When being called , and set apart to the Gospel of God , as the Apostle was Rom. 1. 1. he looks to , and minds the discharge of the duty of the Ministry , as the great work incumbent on him , in relation to Gods glory , and the good of his people . It is fit they should turne Farmers , Merchants , State-Counsellors , any thing rather then Ministers of the Gospel , who make it their chief aim and work to get Manors , Moneys , or the Advancement of this present world . Whosoever they be that mind their corporal dues more , or as much as they do their Spiritual Duties , who look carefully after the reward , and carelesly after the Work of the Ministry , shall never be acknowledged by the Lord in the number of the faithful Ministers of the Gospel . They who account their Ministerial being to consist in their Ministerial Duties , and thē discharge of them , and accordingly presse after the same , though they trade but with one talent , and possibly bring not in visibly much advantage to their Lord , may yet expect to be accepted as faithful Ministers of the Gospel , and to hear at last from their Lord that sweet voice , Well done , good and faithful servant , thou hast been faithful over a few things , I will make thee Ruler over many things , enter thou into the joy of thy Lord , Matth. 25. 23. 2. Secondly , When a man applyeth himself to the dispensing of the whole , and of the pure Word of God to those among whom he laboureth in the Lord. He is an unfaithful Steward who with-holdeth any part of that from the Houshold which was committed to him for their good , and he cannot have the esteem of a faithful Minister of the Gospel , who wittingly keeps back any portion of that good Word and Counsel of God , which hee hath received from the Lord , to impart to others for the making of them wise unto salvation . The Apostle appealed to the knowledge and conscience of the Elders of Ephesus , that he had kept back nothing which was profitable to them , ver . 20. and that he was pure from the blood of all men , in that he had not shunned to declare unto them the whole counsel of God , ver . 26 , 27. It is certain that all Ministers of the Gospel do not arrive at the same height of knowledge in the Mysteries of the Gospel , and counsels of God ; howbeit every Minister of the Gospel is to look and enquire diligently into the Scriptures after the Mysteries of the Gospel and mind of God , and as he hath received , so he is to administer the good Word of God to others , without imbezeling or concealing any part of it ; which whilst he makes conscience , and is careful to do according to his measure , how smal soever , his Ministerial Fidelity in this regard is to be acknowledged , and he shall be accepted according to what he hath , and not according to what he hath not . And as a faithful Minister is careful to dispense the whole , so likewise the pure Word of God , not allaying and attempering the same by carnal mixtures unto the Lusts and likings of corrupt men . The Lords charge in this kind is full of divine Majesty . Jer. 23 28 , 29. The Prophet that hath a Dream , let him tell a Dream , and he that hath my Word , let him speak my Word faithfully . What is the chaff to the wheat , saith the Lord ? Is not my Word like to a fire , saith the Lord , and like a hammer that beateth the rock in pieces ? And herein the Apostle with much joy testified his own , and the fideity of his fellow Laborers in the Gospel , professing that they were not as many which corrupt the Word of God , but as of sincerity , as of God , in the sight of God , spake they in Christ , 2 Cor. 2. 17. 3. Thirdly , A faithful Minister of the Gospel is one that takes care rightly to divide the Word of Truth , and give every one in Gods family that portion of the Word which belongeth unto him . At this branch of Ministerial fidelity the Apostle pointed in that charge , which with so much seriousnesse and solemnity he gave to Timothy , I charge thee before God and the Lord Jesus Christ , who shal judg the quick and dead at his appearing , and his Kingdom : Preach the Word , be instant in season , out of season , reprove , rebuke , exhort with all long suffering and Doctrine . Gods faithful Messengers are careful to dispense instruction to the ignorant , comfort to the feeble minded , terror to the obstinate : On some to have compassion , others save with fear , plucking them out of the fire . This Ministerial fidelity and wisdome is very necessary , and highly accounted of by the Lord in his servants , as appeareth evidently from our Saviours words , Who then is that faithful and wise Steward , whom the Lord shall make Ruler over his houshold , to give them their portion of meat in due season ? Blessed is that servant whom the Lord when he cometh shall find so doing . This fidelity the Apostle Paul again and again called Timothy unto : that commanding counsel cannot be overlooked in this kind , Study to shew thy self approved to God , a workman that needeth not to be ashamed , rightly dividing the Word of Truth . And doubtless , every faithful Minister hath it upon his conscience , and in his care and earnest desire , according to the degree of wisdom received from God , to dispense the Word of God in such wise , that every one may have a seasonable and sutable portion of the same , as shall be necessary for the bringing him in , or building him up , to receive an inheritance amongst those that are sanctified by faith in Christ Jesus . 4. Fourthly , As a faithful Minister of the Gospel is careful to preach , so likewise to pray for the people amongst whom God hath set him . A Preacher that speaks not oftner to God for , then from God to his people , may partingly shake hands , but cannot partakingly joyn hands with the faithful Ministers of Jesus Christ as belonging to their number . The Prophet Jeremiah witnessed his fidelity towards the people in praying to the Lord for them , Remember how I stood before thee to speak good for them , and to turne away thy wrath from them . This is much of the close and closet-work of the faithful Ministers of Jesus Christ . Very many there are now adayes , who think sleightly of the Ministers of the Gospel and their work , supposing that they have little to do , and might well be spared . But did such persons know what is done in private by the faithful Ministers of Christ , how they ply the Lord with prayers for the people , that he would divert his judgments from them , continue and blesse his Ordinances unto them , subdue their sins , increase their graces , comfort their hearts , and save their souls , they could hardly retain such thoughts , or utter such words as they do concerning the despised servants of Jesus Christ . But how ever they are esteemed , or dis-esteemed by men , it is knowne to the Lord , and that is enough , that a faithful Minister is an importunate suter unto him in the behalf of his people , as the Apostle Paul assured the Philippians he was in respect of them . I thank my God upon every remembrance of you , alwayes in every prayer of mine for you all , making request with joy , Philip. 1. 3 , 4. 5. Fifthly , A faithful Minister of the Gospel is to exemplifie what he teacheth others in the course of his owne life . A wicked well speaking Minister , shall never obtain approbation for fidelity from the Lord Jesus . Though a mans words be celestial as of an Angel of Heaven , yet if his Conversation be low , loathsome and corrupt , his prophecying in Christs name , will not prevail with the Lord Christ in the day of Judgment , ●o own and acknowledg him for one of his faithful servants , but he shall then bee found amongst those wretches to whom our Saviour will utter that dreadful voice , I never knew you , depart from me ye that work iniquity . The Apostle Paul exhorted Timothy , and in him all Ministers of the Gospel , who desire to be found faithful , to look to it that they be an example of Believers in Word , in Conversation , in Spirit , in Faith , in Purity . He multiplyed words , as we see , that Timothy and every faithful Minister of the Gospel might see a necessity laid upon him , to make it his great aim and endeavour to walk exemplarily and inoffensively before Gods people in all things . The Proto-Type of Holiness is our Lord Christ , all his faithful Ministers are to be followers of him , that they may be examples to the flock , 1 Cor. 11. 1. He that faileth in this Duty , and is not deeply humbled for his failing , is far from Ministerial faithfulnesse , and by his evil conversation doth more effectually cry down , then by his good Doctrine preach up the power of godliness . 6. Sixthly , Of a faithful Minister of the Gospel it is required that he watch over the souls of those amongst whom he liveth , both for the preventing of hurtful errors , and practical evils , both which tend to the destruction of souls . It appeareth from Heb. 13. 17. that a special part of the work of the Ministers of the Gospel is to have an eye to the souls committed to them , that they be not unawares surprised by Errors in Doctrine , or evils in practice . Errors against the truth or holinesse of the Gospel , are of an insinuating nature , if they be not timely resisted they will make room for themselves , and bring on a shipwrack of faith and a good conscience together . Ministers of the Gospel are therefore in faithfulness to hold fast the faithful Word as they have been taught , and by sound Doctrine both to exhort and convince the gainsayers : They are with all circumspection , specially in such Apostatizing times as we are fallen into , to look to the flock of God , that they be not led away by the errour of the wicked , or possibly of some good men misguided in some particulars , to fall from their own sted fastnesse , but may stand fast and grow in grace , and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ . It may seem at first a small matter to let errour against the Truth or Holinesse of the Gospel into the judgment ; but the judgment tainted with such Errour , is apt to grant out dispensations for the practice of sin , and so a little Errour many times draweth a great sluce to let in a sea of pollution upon men to the drowning of them in everlasting perdition . It therefore belongeth to the faithfulnesse of the Ministers of the Gospel to fortifie and establish their people , what in them lyeth , in the Truth of the Gospel , that they may not be as children tossed to and fro , and carried about with every wind of Doctrine , by the sleight of men , and cunning craftiness , whereby they lye in wait to deceive . but may have their ears shut up against the voice of strangers , and opened only to the teaching of that good Shepherd who hath the words of eternal life . And as faithful Ministers are to watch over the people in respect of Doctrinal Errors , so also of practical evils , that they do not overspread them ; they are often to inculcate the Apostle Doctrine , that the grace of God which bringeth salvation , teacheth us , that denying ungodliness and worldly lusts , we should live soberly , righteously and godly in this present World ; and again , That our Lord Jesus gave himself for us , that he might redeem us from all iniquity , and purifie unto himself a peculiar people zealous of good works ; and therefore that every one that nameth the name of Christ should depart from iniquity . And if they see any one taken in a fault through infirmity , it belongeth to them not only in the right of charity , but special duty to restore such a one with the Spirit of meeknesse ; and when they discover others hardning themselves obstinately in their evil wayes , they are boldly to reprove them , and yet with meeknesse to instruct them , yea though they oppose themselves , if God peradventure would give them repentance to the acknowledgment of the truth , that they may recover themselves out the snare of the Divel , who are taken captive at his will. The sum of all is , When a servant of Jesus Christ separated to the Ministry of the Gospel carefully mindeth his work , and bendeth himself to deliver the Word of God wholly , purely , and seasonably , labouring instantly with God by prayer to procure a blessing on his people , and his labours amongst them , and withal is careful to exemplifie his own Doctrine , that the people may see in him what they hear from him ; and lastly , hath his eyes open to observe , and his mouth open to g●ve warning of such pernicious Errors and Practices , as he seeth breaking in upon such as are committed to his oversight , such a one , however he speed in his own judgment , and the judgment of others , shall not fail before the Judgment Seat of God , to stand in the rank , and passe in the account of the faithful servants and Ministers of Jesus Christ . Having thus shewed when a man may be said to bee a faithful Minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ , I come in the next place to consider , who are they who truly believe the Gospel to whom such faithful Ministers are precious , who enjoy them in love , and part from them in sorrow . There is hardly any thing ( as I conceive ) in our unsettled times more pernicious , then the mistake which many are subject to about the nature of believing . Much talk there is of faith and the Gospel , whilst few consider what is indeed the faith of the Gospel . I shal therefore indeavour in few and plain words , to clear unto you from the Scriptures who are the truly faithful , the true Believers of the Gospel . 1. First , They truly believe the Gospel , who glorifie the Word of the Lord , as it is testifyed of the believing Gentiles , to whom Paul preached the Gospel at Antioch . When the Gentiles heard this , they were glad , and glorified the Word of the Lord , and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed . Every true Believer glorifieth the Word of the Gospel , by yeilding a firme assent unto it as a word of Truth , setting a high price upon it as the only saving Truth , holding it fast as a stable , everlasting Truth , and still desiring of it , and delighting in it , as an edifying and perfecting Truth , which is able to build men up , and give them an inheritance amongst those that are sanctified . If men boast never so much of believing because they are confident that Christ is theirs , and that all the benefits which flow from the Lord Christ are theirs ; yet if they do not glorifie the Word of the Lord , the Word of the Gospel , making an high account of it as a Word of Truth , a saving , everlasting , edifying perfecting Word ; they shall never make it out before the presence of God , that they have the true faith of the Gospel in them . 2. Secondly , True Believers of the Gospel are such as receive the Word of the Gospel with spiritual gladnesse , as we read of that flock of faithful Converts , brought in at one Sermon , Then they that gladly received the word , were baptized . The Word of the Gospel cannot by faith enter into the soul , but it bringeth in spiritual gladness with it . Temporal believing hath a sleight and suddain joy accompanying it , as our Saviour testified in the interpretation of the Parable of the Sower , as to the stony ground , He that received the seed in stony places , the same is he that heareth the word , and anon with joy receiveth it , yet hath he not root in himself , but dureth for a while . An unrooted faith yeildeth an unsettled joy , but when the Word is with a stedfast , sound , and saving faith received , it usually , out of the state of strong temptation , and spiritual disertion , filleth the soul with joy and peace in believing . Now this receiving the Word by faith importeth a taking of it into all the faculties of the soul , to new mould and transform them according to the holiness of the Gospel . The Apostle James calleth it , the receiving of the engrafted word , because the word of the Gospel thus received , as the graft set into the stock , causeth all the sap of the inward faculties of the soul to bring forth such fruit as is sutable to the holy Word of the Gospel . It is a very unworthy and ungrounded Opinion , that a man can believingly receive the word of the Gospel , and not be new moulded by it unto holines . If any think that the Word of the Gospel shall be mighty to save them , when it is not effectual to sanctifie them , they deceive themselves , and should attend to the Apostle James his Doctrine for right information in this point , who sheweth that the Word of the Gospel is received as an ingrafted , new moulding word , in all those towards whom it is effectual to save their souls . 3 Thirdly , They that believingly receive the Word of the Gospel , are brought off from trusting upon their own works and righteousnesse , to trust , and rest their souls upon the Lord Jesus Christ , as the one , which in Scripture dialect imports the only Mediatour between God and man , for forgivenesse of sins , peace with God , righteousnesse and eternal life . The Apostle Paul called believing in Christ , hoping , or trusting in Christ , Ephes . 1. 12 , 13 because all that truly believe , cast away the thought of acceptance with God unto life in the merit of their own Righteousnesse , and as worthlesse sinners build their hope of righteousness to life fully and wholly upon the Lord Jesus as the Mediator of the New Testament , through whom they finally bottom their faith and hope on God , 1 Pet. 1. 21. 4 Fourthly , They truly believe the Gospel who trusting on Christ for Righteousnesse and life , have their hearts brought on by believing , to the love and high prizing of the Lord Jesus as most precious and desirable , 1 Pet. 2. 7. Faith looking and resting upon Christs love , inflameth the heart with the love of Christ , according to the Apostles words , In Christ neither Circumcision availeth any thing , nor uncircumcision , but faith which worketh by love . And this true love of Christ , the necessary and inseparable product of Gospel faith in all true Believers , is obediential , causing the faithful heart to stoop to the yoak and work of the Lord Christ , as we learne from our Saviours own mouth , If ye love me keep my Commandments . And again , He that hath my Commandments and keepeth them , he it is that loveth me . And yet further , If any man love me , he wil keep my words . By all this it is manifest , That they who truly believe the Gospel are such as glorifie the Gospel , by embracing it as a saving , everlasting , edifying , and perfecting Word of Truth ; who with gladnesse receive this word into all the faculties of the soul , to mould them into a frame of Gospel holinesse , who rest themselves upon the Lord Christ for Righteousnesse and life according to the Gospel , and in the strength of that faith have their hearts knit to the Lord Christ , in high prizing obediential love of him . These two Points being dispatched ; viz. Who is a faithful Minister , and Who are the true Believers of the Gospel : I proceed in the next place to shew that such a Minister is enjoyed with much love by such a people . This we have fully ascertained by the Apostles testimony which hee bare unto the Galatians , when the faith of the Gospel at first prevailed amongst them , My temptation ( saith he ) which was in my flesh , ye despised not , nor rejected , but received me even as an Angel of God , even as Christ Jesus . It is not possible to make a higher expression of enlarged love , then this is , whereby the Apostle set forth the affection which the believing Galatians bare towards him as a Minister of the Gospel ; who loved him , and welcomed him upon this account , as they would have done an Angel from Heaven , or the Lord Jesus Christ himselfe , if he had personally appeared and spoken to them . The Grounds of this enlarged love of true Believers towards the faithful Ministers of the Gospel are , amongst others , which it would be too large exactly to treat of , these which follow . 1. First , Believers look upon the faithful Ministers of the Gospel , as a special gift of Christ unto his Church . What thoughts soever others have of faithful Ministers , yet true Believers know that they are in much love , given by the Lord Christ , for the edifying of his body , till all the Members thereof come in the unity of the Faith and Knowledge of the Son of God unto a perfect man , to the measure of the stature of the fulnesse of Christ . And therefore Believers cannot but love such a guift of love proceeding from their beloved Lord and Saviour . 2. Secondly , True Believers look upon the faithful Ministers of the Gospel as Ambassadors for Christ , in whome hee negotiateth with them in much mercy for the accomplishing their reconciliation to God , and eternal happinesse . 2 Corinth . 5. 19 , 20. And therefore beholding Christ in them , they cannot but greatly love them in Christ , and very highly esteem them in love for their works sake . 3. Thirdly , True Believers are experimentally assured , that the faithful Ministers of the Gospel are Ministerial Fathers to some , and Nurses to all Gods people who hear the Gospel from their mouthes . To such as are brought out of a state of ignorance and wickednesse , unto the faith and obedience of Jesus Christ , by the Gospel which they preach , they are ministerial Fathers , as we learne from what the Apostle wrote to the Corinthians , Though ye have ten thousand Instructors in Christ yet have ye not many Fathers ; for in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the Gospel . The Lord of his own will originally begetteth his children by the word of Truth , dispensed in the mouthes of the Preachers of the Gospel ; for , How shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard ? How shall they hear without a Preacher ? and how shall they preach except they be sent ? As it is written , How beautiful upon the mountaines are the feet of them that preach the Gospel of peace , and bring glad tidings of good things ? The faithful Ministers of the Gospel of peace , given by our Lord Christ for the work of the Ministry , are therefore Ministerial Fathers too , and so as spiritual parents acknowledged and beloved by those who through their Ministry are brought to the faith of the Gospel . To others who have formerly entertained the truth of the Gospel in a regenerating power , the faithful Ministers of the Gospel are as Nurses , cherishing and strengthening them by the Word of God , which they preach . For the same Word of the Gospel which begetteth , nourisheth and buildeth up the people of God unto eternal life . And in this second cherishing work the Ministers of the Gospel are and are acknowledged by believers for spiritual Nurses , according to the Apostles expression to the Thessaloniuns , We were gentle amongst you , even as a nurse cherisheth her own children . Now Nurses ( we know ) sometimes get away the love of children from their true parents ; and in the case before us it is often seen , that though true believers cannot forget their ministerial Fathers , yet they are apt to fall much in love with their spiritual Nurses , who at present feed and refresh them with the word of Truth : The sum is , that as Fathers , or Nurses , or both , all those that truly believe the Gospel , are ready to love the faithful Ministers of the Gospel whilst they enjoy them . Now this Truth being acknowledged , the last point I am to speak to in the Doctrine , becometh evident of it selfe ; namely , That a faithful Minister is finally parted from with much sorrow by those who truly believe the Gospel ; for love is a strong bond , knitting the soul so fast to that which is beloved , that it cannot lose it , or be loosed and parted from it without much sorrow . We read , that Jacob loved Joseph more then all his brethren ; and when he thought that Joseph was finally taken from him , He rent his cloathes , and put sackcloath upon his loynes , and mourned for his son many dayes . And all his sons and daughters rose up to comfort him , and he refused to be comforted ; and he said , For I will go down into the grave unto my son mourning . And even thus it is betweene true Believers and faithful Ministers of the Gospel , the true and great love which such Believers bear unto such Ministers , makes their presence sweet , and therefore necessarily their final parting very grievous unto them . To this I will briefly add two further grounds of much sorrow in those who truly believe the Gospel for the final removal of faithful Ministers by death from them . 1. First , When faithful Ministers are taken away by death , Believers are at an utter losse , as to the enjoyment of any comfort or benefit from the person or personal Ministry of them that are so removed from them . If they could have the least hope of re-enjoying a faithful Minister after death , there would be yet some string of comfort to hold by at their departing ; but Believers know that this is a final parting from a faithful Minister , they must never seek counsel , or comfort , or instruction more from his mouth ; death unavoydably putteth the servants of Christ to silence , and taketh them off from being in their persons useful in the work of the Ministry unto the living , for ever . The Apostle Paul wrote to the Philippians , that his abiding in the flesh would be needful for them for their furtherance and joy of Faith , Philip. 1. v. 24 , 25. and thereby intimated , that when he was by death removed from them , they neither could expect , nor should receive any farther benefit from his person or personal Ministry . Herein our blessed Saviour happily differeth from , and hath a transcendent preheminence above his servants in the Ministry , that whereas their final parting from their people in the flesh maketh them personally unuseful to others for the time to come ; it was not so with our Lord Jesus Christ . His parting from his people in the flesh , caused a greater imparting of himself unto them in spiritual benefits , as is testified by our Saviour himselfe saying to his Disciples , Neverthelesse I tell you the truth , it is expedient for you that I go away ; for if I go not away , the Comforter will not come unto you , but if I depart , I will send him unto you . Our Saviour went away as a Mediatour and Advocate between God and Man , and not as a bare Minister of the Gospel ; and in that regard he was forward by his departure in doing good to his servants , and continueth more able to communicate himself in all celestial and spiritual blessings to those that wait upon him ; for , he is still walking in the midst of the golden candlesticks , and hath the stars in his right hand ; and is able to save to the uttermost them that come to God by him , because he ever liveth to make Intercession for them . But none of these things hold in the inferiour Ministers of the Gospel ; when they are removed by death , their personal Ministry , from the moment of their death , ceaseth for ever as to all uses and advantages in respect of others ; and that consideration layeth a heavy weight of sadnesse upon the hearts of Believers , when their faithful Ministers are by death taken from them . 2. Secondly , True Believers know that the final removal of faithful Ministers from any people , carryeth in it the face of a Judgement from the Lord. It was a Promise of great love , I will give you Pastors according to my heart , which shall feed you with knowledge and understanding . And on the contrary , when the Lord taketh away faithful Ministers from any people , he then depriveth them of one of his choicest mercyes upon earth , which cannot therefore but have the appearance of a Judgement in the eyes of true Believers . The Prophet Micah represented evil men as weary of the faithful Teachers , and saying to them , Prophecy ye not , and then from the Lord denounced the Judgement of their ceasing from amongst them , They shall not prophecy unto them . Their refusal of the Prophets was their great sin , and the Lords removal of his Prophets was his heavy judgment upon them . If it be asked concerning a faithful Minister when he dyeth , of what Disease he dyed ? it may be often truly answered , of the judgment of God upon an unthankful people . When men are sick again of their faithful Ministers , and long to be rid of them , it is a righteous thing with God to let them dye , that such a people may dye without instruction . The contempt of the Ministers of the Gospel who desire to be faithful , is a spreading Disease amongst us at this day . Men looking divers wayes , do yet unanimously consent to render the Ministers of the Gospel in this Nation as odious as possibly they can . Without distinction they are all branded as Tythe-Mongers , Time servers , Antichristian , Self-seekers , and what not ? But it is enough , that God is the supreme Judge of those that are thus traduced , and of their Accusers 〈◊〉 howbeit , whilst this Disease so generally reigneth and rageth , it is no marvel though many of Gods faithful servants dye of it , whose removal by death , though possibly some triumph in , yet the true Believers of the Gospel , of whom there is ( blessed be the Lord ) a very considerable number throughout our Land , ●annot but be , as they are , much sadded at it , as carrying the face of an ill presaging judgement in it . Having thus gone through the Doctrine proposed , I come now to a few words of Application . 1. Here is one work whereby they that truly believe the Gospel may have reflexive knowledge of themselves ; namely , by their enjoying the faithful Ministers of the Gospel in love , and parting with them in sorrow . I know there is great difference of judgement at this day , who are to be accounted the faithful Ministers of the Gospel of Christ ? To this an answer may be gathered from what I have before delivered ; at present I shall only say this , That they who being in the place of the Ministers of the Gospel , do visibly apply themselves to do the work of the Ministers of the Gospel , labouring in the Word and Doctrine , that they may ministerially translate men out of darknesse into the Kingdom of Gods dear Son , and build them up in faith and holinesse to eternal life , are so farre ( doubtlesse ) unto others at least , the faithful Ministers of the Gospel , that they who take them to be such , and as such , enjoy them in love , and part from them in sorrow , may from that disposition of theirs receive some evidence in themselves that they are in the number of the true Believers of the Gospel , whereas they who make it a chief ingredient of their Religion , to scorne and revile the Ministers of the Gospel whilst they live , and to insult over them when they dye , to vomit out their choler upon them both living and dying , are not likely , for ought I can learne from the Scriptures , to be approved by our Lord Jesus Christ at his appearing as true Lovers , and Believers of his blessed Gospel . 2. Secondly , This should be a strong inducement to those that are imployed in the Ministry of the Gospel to make it their special desire , care , and study to be found faithful in the Work of the Lord committed to them , that they may bee enjoyed in love , and have the true Believers of the Gospel their unfeigned Mourners at their Funeral . The Apostle saith , Let a man so account of us , as of the Ministers of Christ , and Stewards of the mysteries of God. Moreover it is required in Stewards , that a man be found faithful . The Office ( as we see ) which God hath called the Ministers of the Gospel unto , calleth upon them to be faithful . Without faithfulnesse a nominal Minister of the Gospel , how much soever he boasteth and prideeth himselfe in his Office , is but like unsavoury salt , good for nothing but to be trodden under foot with contempt both by God and men . But when faithfulnesse is found in a Minister of the Gospel , it maketh him shine as a Star , very gloriously in the eyes of the Lord , and all true Believers . That Minister of the Gospel hath the best monument to perpetuate his name with honour , whose faithfulnesse in the Ministry , hath procured him the love of true Believers , so that his presence is pleasant to them in life , and his memory precious with them after death . 3. In the third place , the servants of God may here read their warrant for sadly bewailing and mourning over such as have been faithful in in the Ministry of the Gospel , when they are by death finally taken from them . Heathenish mourning over the dead accompanied with murmuring and impaciency against God , becometh not the children of God in any wise . It is the Lords command given of old to the Jewes , Ye are the children of the Lord your God , you shall not cut your selves ; nor make any baldnesse betweene your eyes for the dead . Because they were by Covenant the children of God above other Nations , therefore they were not to follow the practice of other Nations in their excessive mourning for the dead , but to quiet themselves in the will of their God and Father , knowing that his Saints are precious in his sight both in life and death . And accordingly the Apostle Paul carefully provided that the Thessalonians having imbraced the Gospel of Christ , might not sorrow over their dead as Heathens , destitute of hope of a future happinesse or glorious Resurrection , 1 Thess . 4. 13. Howbeit , with due moderation , in humility of soul , and quiet submission to the will of God , it is not onely warrantable , but laudable ; a practice which grace bringeth the people of God unto , to mourne over the faithful Messengers of God , when they are by death called home out of this present world . When Steven was slaine by the Jewes , Devout men carried him to his Burial , and made great lamentation over him . This is mentioned by the Holy Ghost not as a groundlesse , but as a gracious practice of these Believers , evidencing their Christian love to Stephen , that blessed Martyr of the Lord. In proportion to this great lamentation made by devout men at Stephens Funeral , and the sore weeping of the Believers of Ephesus , at Pauls final parting from them , mentioned in my Text , I doubt not but our mourning over our deceased Brother at this time is lawful , and laudable in the presence of the Lord. I will not multiply words in reference to this our Reverend Brother now taken from us , I shall leave his Works to praise him in the Gate , being well assured , that many who have felt and tasted the power and comfort of his Ministry , will beare witnesse to him , and the working of God in him for their good . One thing there is relating to his death which I cannot omit , that the Lord greatly testified his acceptation of him in his Work , in that he dyed of Epaphroditus his sicknesse , of whom the Apostle wrote , That for the work of Christ he was nigh unto death . The Work of Christ , of which Epaphroditus was sick , was , as far as wee can judge , a special part of the Disease of which this our Brother dyed ; for after that some symptomes and beginnings of a bodily weaknesse had seized upon him , his turn came to supply a Lecture at a place somewhat remote from his owne habitation , which therefore some , neerly related to him , earnestly perswaded him to forbear for that time ; but such was his Zeal towards the work of Christ , that it caused him to neglect his friends advice and his own health , and to overlook his present danger , and so undertake the Work of Preaching the Gospel in his course , under the weight of which labour of love , his weak body did apparently sink in the time and place of that publick service ; after which returning home , he declined more and more untill the time of his death . Our Saviours words therefore seem plainly to reach this our Brother , and pronounce him blessed , Blessed is that servant whom the Lord when he cometh shall find so so doing . The Lord when he came to this our Brother , by death , found him doing , so doing , doing his Lords Work faithfully , and therefore looking on him , we have cause to part with him rejoycingly , being much assured of his blessednesse ; yet looking at our selves , we have cause to part with him sadly , when we consider that we shal have his help , and see his face no more . A Pillar is fallen , and by the fall thereof a great breach made in this place , this County , this Land ; which that the Lord may be pleased in mercy to make up , by increasing the number , strengthning the hands , and blessing the Labours of his faithful Servants in the Ministry , we have great cause to bow our knees before him , and to beg this favor from him in the name of the Lord Jesus ; to whom with the Father , and blessed Spirit , be praise and Glory for ever . Amen . FINIS . Notes, typically marginal, from the original text Notes for div A85510-e30 a Vind. Ley Lect. 26. pag. 249. b Ames coron . artic . 1. c. 1. § 4 Impetration is the foundation of application . c Camero in Ps . 68. inter Arg Solut. Med. ult d Prideaux Ser● Draught of the brook . And Perk. Ref. Cath. of Merit . e Panstr . Cathol . tom . 3. l. 14. c. 16. & 21. ad 25. f Ibid. 9. 38. 12 Cor. 4. 17. h Jer. 3. 13. i 〈…〉 k 〈…〉 p. 112. l Gataker Rejoynd . p. 31. m Fidem ponī ut conditionem salutem quidem antecedentem ; sed electionem ipsam consequentem nunquam à nostris negatum fuit ; summā verò cum religione constanter traeditum . Cor. de Elect. c. 1. §. 4. p. 7. n 2 Thes . 2. 11. o Rejoynder p. 47. p Si igitur haec esset mens et sententia Synodi , quod simpliciter vellet monstrare illum , de quo jam diximus , modum et ordinem , quo juxta Scripturae traditionem Deus utitur quando homines vult deducere ad justificationem ; et si illa quae Scriptura tradit procedere , tribuerent non viribus liberi arbitrii , sed gratiae Dei , et operationi Sp. Sancti , nec in illis praeparationibus constituerem meritum aut dignitatem , propter quam justificemur : facilè posset de vocabulo praeparationis , dextrè juxta Scripturam intellecto , conveniri . Exam. part 1 p. 172. q Falsum est igitur quod in 9 canone nobis tribuunt , quasi docemus nullum plane motum voluntatis divinitus donatum et excitatum , praeced ere acceptionem justificationis : Omnino enim docemus poenitentiam et contritionem praecedere . Non dicimus , praecedere tanquam meritum , quod suâ dignitate cooperatur ad justificationem consequendam , sed sicut sensus morbi aut dolor vulneris non est meritum sanationis , sed urget et impellit ad desiderandum , quaerendum , et sucipiendum medicum . r At Evangelium non promittit salutem absque ulla conditione legis observandae ; neque id nostrumquisquam docuit : modò ne conditio pro merito sumatur . tom . 3. l. 15. c. 2. § 9. nam et fidei conditio non est antecedens sed consequens , quia nullum fidei meritum attenditur , sive fides non est causa salutis . ſ Non negamus bona opera ullam relationem habere ad salutem ; habent enim relationem adjuncti consequentis , et effecti ad salutem ( ut loquuntur ) adeptam ; et adjuncti antecedentis , ac disponentis ad salutem adipiscendam ; atque etiam argumenti confirmantis , fiduciam ac spem salutis : sed negamus ulla opera nostra causam esse posse meritoriam justificationis ac salutis . Bel. ener . tom 4. lib. 6 cap 6. s Promissiones cum conditione obedientiae ut causae juris quod habemus ad rem promissam , sunt propriae legis : sed promissiones cum conditione obedientiae , ut adjuncti aut effecti rei promissae , vel dona●ionis ejus , locum suum habent in benignissimae gratiae regno , ubi meritis nostris nullus habetur locus . cap. 5. §. 2. t Haec et hujusmodi opera cordis interna sunt omnibus justificatis necessaria : non quod contineant in se efficaciam seu meritum justificationis , sed quod juxta ordinationem divinam vel requirentur ut conditiones praeviae seu concurrentes , sicuti poenitere et credere ; vel ut effecta à fide justificante necessariò manartia , ut amare Deum , diligere proximum . De just . act . cap. 30. Q. 1. Argum. 1. u In Psal . 68 in solut . arg . med . ult . v Tract . of Justif . Sect. 2. c. 1. Per modum causae efficientis & meritoriae , impetrando , promerendo ; & suo modo inchoando justificationem . w Non controvertitur an promissiones Evangelicae ut sint fructuosae & salutares , requirant fidem : Nocum est illud Christi , Mar ult 6. Johan . 1. 16. Nec in controversiam vocatur , An promissiones Evangelicae ita gratuitae sint & absolutae , ut absolvant hominem à dolore serio ob peccata , et ab omni studio b●norum operum ? Infans enim sit oportet in Scriptu●is , cui non innotuerae bae Spiritus sancti assertiones : Rom. 6. 1 , 2. & 8. 1. Tit. 4. 10. Genuinus autem quaest : onis status est , An Evangelium propter ullam nostram dignitatem , intentionem , opus , me itum , ullámve in nobis dispositionem , promi●tat nobis gratiam , misericordiam , remissionem peccatorum , & vitam aeternam ; an ve ò per & propter Jesum Christum fide apprehensum ? Syst . tom 2. art . de Evang. c. 2. x An in gratuita remissione peccatorum , requiratur conditio fidei , ut aliquod opus nostrum , aut aliqua in nobis dispositio ; cui ut cau●ae efficienti , adjutanti , aut cooperanti , ascribatur gra●uita remissio peccatorum ; quod rotundè negamus y Vind. Leg. Lect. 26. p. 249. A Reward of is Justic . Ball. ●ov . p. 25. Conditio Antecedens est effectiva . z Tom. 3. l. 5. c. 5. §. 2. a ibid. §. 16 Quum promissiones de perseverantia obsolutas esse negant , sed conditionatas tantum , &c. Ames . Cor. p. 389. In Cap. 5. ad Rom. v 14. In illa verba Qui est typus su uri . c Donatam igitur & gratiam & salutem omnes & singuli habent ; quamvis rei donatae possessionem non habent ante fidem . Cor. p. 126 , 127. Fas est ab hosto doceri . § 1. c. 3. of Justific . We grant that God doth justifie an ungodly person but in sensu diviso , not in sensu composito ; so as he makes the lame to leap , the blind to see Isai . 33. 6. Mat. 11. 5. By order of Nature he is first a believer , and then is justified . Rutherford Survey of Antin . p. 110 c New Cov. p. 26. f Lib. 2. Par. 16. g Circumcisio erat signum obligatorium foederatorum , seu restipulationis Abrahami , obligans eum & postoros ad fidem & obedientiam foederis Deo praestandam . Peraeus in Gen. 17. 11. Who adds , that both Sacraments , Circumcision and Baptism , do agree , as in other ends , so in this , Quod utroque fit obligatio solennis ad fidem & obedientiam oederis Deo praestandam . Ibid. h Grounds and Ends of Infant Baptism p. 38. i Hos . 2. 23. k Dicere Dei est efficere ; dicam ego , i. e. efficiam populum meum . Dicere nostrum est fides & obedientia nostra . l Chap 3. 3. Lex fidei doctrina fidei . quae fidem exagit , per quam sine operibus expectatur à Deo justitia . Alio nomine lex Evangelii . Par. & Mart. in loc . n Rom. 6. 20. o Ver. 18 , 19 , 20 See Dr. Preston N. Coven . p. 458 459. 500. &c. p Baptismus nulli adulto conferendus est , nisi priu● ediderit confessionem peccatorum & fidei in Christum ; ac praterea primissionem sanctae vitae . in Mat 3. Obs . ex ver . 6 , 8 , 10. Baptizari in nomen alicujus est illi consecrari ad cultum , ut quis ab illo tanquam suo Domino denominatur ciusque servitio se totum ad●rcat . Pisin Marth . 28 v. 19. r Est tess●●a & nota qua sicut differimus ab iis omnibus Gentibus , sic etiam protestamur velle differre , & cum solo populo Dei communionem 〈◊〉 bere , ac foederis quod sancitum est in Christo inter Deum & nos conditiones servare velle . In cap. 5 ad Ephes . de Bapt. cap. 3. Thes . 37. ſ Baptismus est pactum purioris cum Deo , curandum itaque ut quod semel gestum est in baptismo Sacram entaliter semper in vita peregatur veraciter , Dav. in Colos . 2. v. 1 2. Cor. 2. s Quemadmodum milites jurant in nomen Imperatoris , atque ita illi obstring untur , ut postea non liceat eis versa●i in castris hostium , quod si secus fecerint sit Capital : ita nos in baptismo obstring imur Christo , ju●amusque nos postea nunquam defecturos ad Diabolum . Martyr in Rom 6. 3. t Notum est ex catechesis nos baptizari in nomine Sacrae Sanctae Trinitatis tanquam unius Dei , quia in fidem , cultum , obedientiam Dei nomine astringimur , & nos haec ipsa Deo restipulamur . Baptizamur in mortem Christi dupliciter : Primùm respectu Dei , quatenus is beneficia mortis Christi baptismi signaculo nobis donat & obsignat : Deinde quantum ad nos , restipulando fidem tantorum beneficiorum Christi , & mortificationem peccati virture mortis Christi , ne nobis dominetur . Paraeus in loc . u Byfield in Col. ● v. 12. Luth. Gal 3. vers . 19. All the Faithful have had al way one and the self same Gospel , and by that they were saved . So also Pemb. vind . fid . 138 p. Treat . of Justif . Sect. 4 cap. 1. Dr. Preston N. Coven . p. 398. When a man doth this , at that very hour hee is entered into Covenant , he is translated from death to life . v Christ set forth in his Death , &c. p. 28. w Jus & proprictas doni ex donantis benefica largitione resultai : acciperet aliàs non suum donatorius quum rem donatam teneret . Cor. p. 127. Qui alterum incusai probri ipsum se intueri oporiet . See this distinction of complacency and compassion confirmed by Rutherford his Survey of Antinomianism . x Qui creavit te sine te , non salvabit te sine te . Quemcunque trahit volentem trahit . Nostra fides justos ab injustis , non operum , sed ipsius fidei lege discernir . In quo dormit fides , non vigilat Christus . Justificatio per fidem Jesu Christi data est , datur , & dabitur credentibus ante legem , sub lege , & post legem eadem . Credendo invenimus quod Judaei amiserunt . y Jubendo monet & facere quod possumus , & petere quod non possumus . O homo , in praeceptione cognosce quid debeas habere , in correptione cognosce tuo te vitio non habere ; in oratione , unde accipias quod vis habere . De Cor. & gra . c. 3. z Non quia omnes in eum credunt , sed quia nemo Justificatur nisi in eum credat . Itaque omnes dictum est , ne aliquo modo alio praeter ipsum quisquam salvus fieri posset , credatur . De Nat. & grat . c 41. a Fides est justitiae fundamentum quam nulla bona opera praecedunt , sed ex qua omnia procedunt . Inde , i.e. ex Doctrina Apostolica , capit quisque vitam , quam parit una fides . b Hoc ergo byssopo asperges me , quando vit tutem Sanguinis ejus effundes super me , quando & fidem habitabit Christus in me . Moses distinxit in Levitico inter utramque justitiam , fidei scilicet atque factorum , quod altera operibus , altera dola fidei credulitate accedente fiat . c Secundùm propositum gratiae , sic decretum est à Deo , ut cessante lege , solam fidem gratia Dei posceret ad salutem , in Rom. 4. Haec lex ( scil . Spiritus ) dat libertatem , solam fidem poscens . Idem . in 2 Cor. 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . Like to which he hath another passage : The true office of the Law , which can be never enough magnified , is to shew us our sins , to humble us , kil us , bring us down to hel , that we may be justified . Cha. 3 vs . 23. ad finem . d Negamu : testamentum Dei de remissione peccatorum in Christo habere adjunctā conditionem . Com. in Rom. c. 11. p. 1281. e Nonne hic satis perspicuè dicitur , oportere nos credere , illum Jesum Christum , quem Deus refuscitavit , mortuum fuisse & resurrexisse , ut nos justificaremur , & nobis omnia delicta condonarentur . Pag. 1292. f Omnis qui videt filium & credit in eum , habet vitam aeternam . Sic ergo inferimus , At ego credo in Filium Dei , ergo hab●● Jam , et ●abebo id quod promisit . p. 1293 g Nisi fides desit , qua oblata apprehendamus , per promissiones justificamur . Pag. 1294. h Lex recipitur faciendo & exactissimè praestando quod praecipitur ; Evangelium autem per vivum & effic●cem fidei assensum . Moses quoque Deut. 30. de eadem lege scripsit , se prop●suisse populo vi●am & mortem ; manifeste docens , si reciperetur lex & impleretur , vitam & quidem ae●ernam secum fore allaturam . Verum cum excludamur hoc commodo , misericors Deus aliud verbum providit , nempe fidei ; quod si assentiendo recipiatur , vitam secum habet . Ex hoc loco apparet promissiones legis datas ex hypothesi , seu conditione praecedentium operum . In Evangelio autem si promissionibus annectantur opera , ea non sunt accipienda vel ut merita , vel ut causa illarum promissionum : sed ita statuendum est , ut illa Dei dona quae promittuntur post opera sequantur , cametsi non perfecta fuerint & absoluta ut à lege imperantur . P. 1026 , 1027. i Non in eo discrepant , ut quidam putant , quod Evangelicae non habeant adjectas conditiones ; Legales autem sine conditionibus nunquem offerantur . Quemad modum enim dicitur , Honora patrem & matrem , ut sis longaevus super terram ; & si volueritis , & audieritis me , bona terrae comdedatis . Ita in Evangelio etiam legimus : Remittite & remittetur , Date & dabitur , &c. quare cum hoc discrimen non sit , aliud quaerendum est . Quamobrem apparet diligenter intuenti , conditiones leges potuisse causas esse consecutionis praemiorumquae promittebantur . Nam fi●illae perfectae & absolutae fuissent , ut erant à e●e imperatae , cum ipsis praemils comparari potuissent et meriti rationem habuissent . Sed cum illae prestari ab hominibus non potuissent , Deus ex sua misericordia subjecit promi●siones Evangelicas illorum loco : quae quamvis conditiones adjectus habent , tamen offeruntur gratis . Pag. 667. Quare si haec tria conjungis , praemiae Evangelica promitti gratis ; conditiones illis non posse aequari , & promissiones oportere esse firmissimas ; & meriti rationem auferes , quo discrimine illa à segalibus differant , facilè cernes . Pa. 668. k 〈◊〉 conditionem aut stipulationem ulli● bonae cogitationis ab ipsorum viribus . De subst-foed . grat . p. 3 edit . Gen. Anno 1585. l Qui cum tales sint , nolle se , ait Dominus , ejusmodi ●oedus cum illis percutere , cujus vel minima pars in ipsorum viribus fundata sit , Pag. 12. m Quamobrem , ne concidat foedus apud mileros homines , in peccatis mortuos , corda habentes lapidea , qui legi Dei non subjiciuntur , & ne possunt quidem , Rom 8. qui denique non idonei sunt ad cogitandum quicquam boni ex se ipsis 2 Cor. 3. Sed ut firmum maneat , ejusmodi foedus promittit , cujus universa essentia à se solo dependeat , & in Christo suo fundata sit . — Modum etiam exequendi sui decreti in nobis ejusmodi promittit , cujus vis & efficacia non à corrupto homine , sed à se solo Proficiscatur . Pag. 13. n Nullā que conditione nostrae dignitatis , meritorum , aut propriā virium niti . Pag. 14. o P. 211 , & 215 p Pag. 3. q Universa substantia foederis gratuita est : Quoad Deum , is propriè foedus nobiscum percuti● , cum promissionem reconciliationis gratuitae in Evangelio oblatam per Spiritum Sanctum cordibus obsignat , & renovationem ad vitam aeternam inchoat , in●ies promovet , ac tandem perficit , Quoad nos , qui mortui eramus in peccatis , recipitur foedus , dum gratis nobis donatur Spiritus Sanctus , per quem excitati è morte in vitam , fit , ut non modo velimus & possimus credere gratuitae promissioni de reconciliatione per Christum , & instauratione nostri ad adeundum haereditatem regni Coelestis ; sed etiam ut credamus , seu ipsam fidem accipiamus . Pag. 15. r Atque ita totum haec foedus merè esse gratuitum , & nullâ conditione nostrarum virum , sed gratuita Dei misericordia in Christo , per fidem , quam ipse donat , apprehensa , constare , certum est ; oblatio duplicis promissionis in Christo , remissionis scil . peccatorum , & sanctificationis , atque ipsius Christi donatio , quoad Deum , est gratuita : acceptatio ex parte nostra etiam est gratuita , quia est Dei actio in nobis , qua promissionem suam obsignat cordibus , ut acti agimus , &c. Pag. 16. ſ Pag. 211 , 212 213 , 216. t Quia foedus non inter invitos , sed volentes contrabitur , testimonia visibilia instituit , quibus & assensum nostrum in gratuitum foedus in verbo oblatum stipuletur , quem ut ipsemei in elect is operatur , ita publicè ad suam gloriam apparere , vult , & fimul in verbo oblatum foedus symbolis ( solemni contestatione prius facta , velle vim , ipsos esse suum populum ) obfignat . Part 2. p. 311. Quia Deus non aliis jurat quam credentibus , ideo cum ad actionem foederatoriam descendit , prius assensum à nobis stipulatur , mandando ejus testificationem solenni ritu , quam ad promissionis obsignationem atque impletionem ipse descendat . Pag. 302. vide plura pag. 304 , 305. ad 320. Sine ulla interjecta vel poeni tentiae vel fidei conditione absolutissimè ait Desponsabo te mihi in perpetuum . In Hos . 2. onal . in v. 21 , 22. § 1. ſ Promittit & novum connubium , & omnia quae ad hoc connubium etiam ex parte exotis contrabendum , ●um confirmandum inperpetuum pertinent . t Promittit se effecturum & perpetuo connubio simul ei copulati . Perpe●uum autem esse non potest connubium , nisi sicut in Deo , sic etiam in nobis perpetua sit fides & Spiritus Christi , per quem hoc connubium & contrahitur , & conservatur . Ergo promittit se effectum ut perpetua in nobis e●ect●s , sit fides , & Spiritus Christi . Ibid● §. 25. §. 26 , 27 , ad 33. u Notandum , hanc esse simplicem & evangelicam sine ulla conditione promissionem . Hic enim nihil exigit Deus , sed simpliciter promittit quod velit ipse ecclesiae suae facere ; adeo ut promittat etiam fidem , sine qua reliquae promissiones in nobis locum habere non possunt . w Innuit illa dictione , Ego , Deum esse authorem nostrae reconciliationis , & consequentur nostrae salutis . Ipse est qui prior venit ad nos , & nos sibi ipse desponsar . Nos non ipsum praeve nimus aut quaerimus in sponsum , sed ipse praevenit nos ut desponset nos sibi . Ego , inquit , desponsabo te ; huc illud 1 Joh. 4. Non quod nos prius dilexerimus eum , sed ipse prior dilexerit nos . Vae nobis si Deus nos non praeveniret , § 5. Desponsabo . x Deut. 7. y Ratio foederis faciendi seu promittendi , est , qua Deus ex gratia , extra nostra merita foedus hoc nobiscum init ; foedesque hoc nullis nostris suffultum est meritis . Pag. 44. §. 3. Ratio . z Foederis vinculo se unit cum populo , & populus vicissim unitur Deo : sicut sponsus cum sponsa , & sponsa cum sponso , fide conjugii utrinque data . P. 43 §. Cum autem . a Ibid. 43. Col. ● . Ex parte nostri substantia foederis est id quod à nobis stipulatur , & nos premittimus . &c. p. 45. a In 1. Epist . Joha . cap. 1. loc . de rem . peccat . q. 6. Quibus conditionibus remissio peccatorum offeratur & conferatur . b Sunt conditiones non propter quas , sed citra quas peccatorum remissio non obtinetur . — Et si citra bas conditiones obtineri remissio peccatorum non potest , non tamen propter eas tanquam propter merita . Ideo Johannes ait , Si confiteamur , ecce conditionem ; non tamen ait , propter confessionem — Nam etiam citra fidem haberi non potest justificatio , non tamen propter dignitatem fidei haberi eam dicimus , sed gratis . — Deinde illud notandum est , etiam has conditiones quas requieit à nobis Deus , donari nobis à Deo , & esse dona Dei ; non ergo meritis ullo modo , sed soli Dei gratiae danda est remissio peccatorum . c Vsum istius nominis in hac significatione Classicis authoribus non fuisse incognitum ante in oratione quadam demonstravimus . Patal . l. 3. c. 9. d Dei gratiam luculentiorem hominibus explicatam esse , quòd suis non foedus , sed Testamentum dederit . Quiae foedus conditiones mutuas fuisset habitum , quas si altera pars non praestet , foedus est irritum . Testamentum verò liberalitatis & gratiae , citra ullam conditionem instrumentum est , ex quo haeredes vocantur & instituuntur citra contemplationem ullius officii quod ab ipsis proficissi possit . e Substantia utriusque restamenti una quidem atque communis est in Christo Jesu ; eaque partibus duabus comprehensa pro ut Abrahamo primum , Gen. 17. deinde vero posteris illius fuit exposita ; una , promissionis , quum Deus inquit , futurus sim ipsis D●us : altera , conditionis appositae , qua Deus petit ut nos viciss●m pareamus ad stipulationem ip●●● , quam ●i , & ipsi e●unt mihi populus . Par. l. 3. c. 8. f Hujus promissionis Evangelicae antecedens sive 〈◊〉 conditio poterat multorum animos deterrere , ac potius omnium si legis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in carne nostra ( ut necesse est ) expendissent ; cujus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 inde à principio sermonis hujus conditionem Moses expresserat , dicens , nondum dedit vobis Jehova mentem ad cognoscendum . — Ne igitur impossibilem conditionem propositam sibi à Deo fuisse quererentur , commoditatem istius Moses his verbis explicat ; Nam praeceptum hoc quod ego praecipio tibi , &c. quasi dicat , hactenus proposui tibi partem priorem foederis , ut obsequaris Deo : sed quia altera quaeque pars foederis est tibi necessaria , ut Deus tuus quasi novo foedere ( quod tamen reipsa unum est ) suis partibus erga te defungatur cum tu ipse non possis ; & circumcidens cor tuum inscribat ei legem suam & foedus suum ad obedientiam fidei . Par. lib. 2. part 16. g Hoc praeceptum fidei quod cloquor neque occultum , neque longinquum , & cum id ipsum in ore tuo , & corde tuo gratiosè Deus ind● , si tantum fide potes prehendere . h Concedimus , hominis officium requiri , illud insuper contendentes , Deum hujus premissionis vi effecturum in suis , ut officium illud faciant , quatenus necessariò est faciendum Cor. act . 5 p. 400. To●a dispositio Testamentariam habet 〈◊〉 , ut simpliciter 〈…〉 conditio ; atque hac ratione , ad modum foederis aliquando proponitur : qui tamen proponendi modus non sic est accipiendus , ut Testamenti naturam in ulla parte mutet . Utrumque à nostris optimè conjungi solet , quum justitiam ac vitam , sub conditione fidei promitti docent , & fidem ipsam electis dari , vel conditionem foederis in ipso foedere simul promitti . Pag. 40. Mark 16 k Survey of Antinom . p. 129. l Socin . Disc & Consut p. 225. m Order of the causes of Salvation . c. 31. n Ref. Cath. tit . of Justif . Diff. 2. 2. o Treat . of the N. Cov. p. 17. p Of Justif . §. 4. c. 1. q Tract . 1. of Justif . l. 6. c. 8. §. 10. r In fodere Evangelico aliter se res habet ; nam in hoc foedere ad obtinendam reconciliationem , justificationem & vitam aeternam , non alia requiritur conditio quam verae & vivae fidei : Sic Deus dilexit mundum . Joh. 3. 16. Rom. 4. 5. Gal. 3. 8. Justificatio igitur & jus ad vitam aeternam ex conditione solius fidei suspenditur . De just . act . c. 30. in resp . ad ob . 3. ſ Lex in conditione operum habet ipsam vim & formam icti foederis : At Evangelium in Mediatoris sanguine fide apprehenso collocat ipsam vim & formam foederis . Ibid. s Promissio vitae aeternae juxta pactum Evangelicum & foedus gratiae , pendet ex conditione fidei . Id. cap. 32. in sol . ad ob . 1. p. 407. Si per conditiones salutis intelligamus conditiones foederis quibus recipimur in favorem Dei , & ad jus vitae aeternae : haec enim pendent ex solo conditione fidei Christum Mediatorem apprehendentis . Ibid. p. 406. t De trip . foed . Thes . 8 , 9. In foedere naturae exigitur Justitia naturalis , at in foedere gratiae exigitur tantum fides . u Foedus gratiae est illud quo Deus proposita conditione fidei in Christum , remissionem peccatorum in ejus sanguine , & vitam coelestem pollicetur , idque eo fine ut ostendat divitias misericordiae suae . Thes . 82. v In 3. ad Rom. 23 in illa verba , Per fidem . w Ex illa vitam nemo consequitur , quia conditio faciendi omnia leg●s , nulli est possibiis extra Christum . Ex hoc fructum & vitam consequi facile est , quia conditio confitendi Dominum Jesum , & credendi ejus Resurrectionem prope est , in ore , & in corde nostro . In cap. 10. ad Rom. v. 9. x Nos legis & Evangelii discrimen cum quaerimus utrumque nominare contracta illa significatione , secundum quam Paulus oponit legem operum , legi fidei . Hoc est , legem operum proponere salutem sub conditione legis per ficiendae . At legem fidei candem preponere , sub conditione tantum credendi in Christum : nimirum , ut u●rinque conditio sumatur codem sensu . Tom. 3. lib. 15. cap. 3. § 26. § 27 , 28 , 29. Penes quos est vis 〈◊〉 loq●di * This Book was delivered unto Mr. Eyre in the Authors life time , some years since , before his Book against Mr. Woodbridge , Mr. Crauford , and Mr. Baxter came forth . Notes for div A85510-e12940 Job 30. 23. John 5. 28 , 29 1 Pet. 5. 2 , 3 , 4 Phil. 1. 23 1 Thes . 2. 19 , 20 Doctr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . 1 Tim 4. 15 2 Tim. 4. 1 , 22 Jude v. 22 , 23 ● Luke 12. 42 , 43 2 Tim. 2. 15 Jer. 19. 20 Matth. 7. 23 1 Tim. 4. 12 Tit. 1. 9 Ephes . 4. 14 Tit. 2 , 11 , 12 and 14 2 Tim. 2. 19 Gal. 6. 1 1 Tim. 5. 20 2 Tim. 2. 25 , 26 Acts 13. 48 Acts 2. 41 〈◊〉 . 13. 20 , 21 ●om . 15 13 ●ames 1 21 Gal. 5. 6 Joh. 14. 15. 21 , 23 Gal. 4. 14. Ephes . 4. 11 , 12 1 Cor. 4. 15 James 1. 18 1 Thess . 2. 7 Gen. 37. 34 , 35 John 16. 7 Revel . 1 Heb. 7. 25 Jer. 3. 15 Micah 2. 6 1 Cor. 4. 1 , 2 Deut. 14. 1. Acts 8. 2 Phil. 2. 30 Matth. 24. 4 6.