A treatise of oaths containing several weighty reasons why the people call'd Qvakers refuse to swear : and those confirmed by numerous testimonies out of Gentiles, Jews and Christians, both fathers, doctors and martyrs : presented to the King and great council of England, assembled in Parliament. Penn, William, 1644-1718. 1675 Approx. 317 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 87 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2007-01 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A70779 Wing P1388 ESTC R17219 12599618 ocm 12599618 64138 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A70779) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 64138) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 675:1 or 1675:14) A treatise of oaths containing several weighty reasons why the people call'd Qvakers refuse to swear : and those confirmed by numerous testimonies out of Gentiles, Jews and Christians, both fathers, doctors and martyrs : presented to the King and great council of England, assembled in Parliament. Penn, William, 1644-1718. Richardson, Richard, 1623?-1689. Parker, Alexander, 1628-1689. Whitehead, George, 1636?-1723. [2], 4, [8], 9-166 p. s.n.], [London? : 1675. Signed: "This perform'd in the name and for the service of the people call'd Quakers. William Penn, Richard Richardson." Prefixed to the "Treatise" is an address "To the King and great council of England, assembled in Parliament", subscribed by Alexander Parker, George Whitehead and several others, the signatures ending with the names of Richardson and Penn. Place of imprint suggested by Wing. Errors in paging. Item at reel 1659:3 identified as Wing P1400 (number cancelled). Reproduction of originals in Duke University Library and Harvard University Library. Includes bibliographical references and index. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Society of Friends -- Doctrines. Oaths. 2005-08 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2006-02 SPi Global Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2006-04 John Latta Sampled and proofread 2006-04 John Latta Text and markup reviewed and edited 2006-09 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion A TREATISE OF OATHS , Containing Several Weighty Reasons why the People call'd QVAKERS refuse to SWEAR : And those Confirmed by Numerous Testimonies out of Gentiles , Jews and CHRISTIANS , both Fathers , Doctors and Martyrs . Presented to the King and Great Council of England , Assembled in PARLIAMENT . Mat. 5.34 . But I say unto you , Swear not at all . Jam. 5.22 . Above all things , my Brethren , Swear not . Jer. 32.10 . Because of Oaths the Land Mourneth . Theognis , He ought to Swear neither this thing nor any thing . Maimonides , It is a great Good for a Man not to Swear at all . Chrysostom , It is not lawful to Swear , neither in a just nor unjust Cause . Printed Anno 1675. TO THE King and Great Council OF ENGLAND , Assembled in PARLIAMENT . The Case of the People call'd QUAKERS relating to OATHS further Represented ; and Recommended to their Consideration , in order to a Speedy and Effectual REDRESS . THe common Benefit of the Free People of England being undoubtedly both the first and greatest Reason for the Ancient , Just & Necessary Constitution of Parliaments ; and being also inform'd that it is your Resolution , to employ this Session to the Redress of Publick Grievances : And since We cannot but repute our selves a Member of this Great Body you represent , by Birth and English Descent ; and are not only involved in the Common Calamities of the Kingdom , but in Particular very cruelly Treated in our Persons and Estates , because we cannot for pure Conscience take any Oath at all ( though we have again and again tender'd our solemn Yea or Nay ; and are most willing to sustain the same Penalty in Case of Lying , that is usually inflicted for Perjury ) To the End we may not be interpreted to decline the Custom out of meer Humour or Evasion ( though our frequent & heavy Sufferings by Fines and tedious Imprisonments , sometimes to Death it self , should sufficiently Vindicate us against any such Incharitable Censure ) WE do , with all due Respect , present you with our Reasons for that Tenderness , and many Testimonies and Pr●sidents in their Defence ; and we entreat you , to express that Care of a Member of your own Civil Body , which Nature and Christianity excite to ; We mean , That it would please you to consider how deeply we have already suffered , in Person and Estate , the Inconveniencies we have daily to encounter , and those Injurious not only to our selves , but others we commerce with , in that both they and we , because of our Tenderness in this Matter , are constantly at the Mercy of such as will Swear any thing to advantage themselves , where they are sure that a Contrary Evidence shall be by Law esteem'd ( however True ) Invalid ; under which Difficulty several of us at this Hour fruitlesly labour : That being sensible of our Calamity , you may please to endeavour , as for others , so for this Grievance , both a Speedy and Effectual Redress ; otherwise , besides ordinary Cases , wherein many of us extraordinarily suffer , we may perhaps prove in this of Oaths the Greatest , if not the Only Sufferers of the Kingdom ; a Cruelty , we hope , you do not design against us . God Almighty , we beseech him with all Sincerity of Heart , incline you to Justice , Mercy and Truth , Amen . London , the 25th of the 3d Moneth , 1675. Subscribed on the behalf of the rest of our Friends by , Alexander Parker , George Whitehead , Stephen Crisp , William Mead , Gerrard Roberts , William Welsh , Samuel Newton , Thomas Heart , John Osgood , James Claypool , Thomas Rudyard , Richard Richardson , & William Penn. A Catalogue of the Authors , Testimonies and Presidents cited in Favour of this Treatise . AESchylus , p. 31. Albertus Magnus , p. 10 , 115. Albingenses , p. 100 , 121. W.C. Albrid . p. 12. Alexander de Ales , p. 115. Alexander ab Alexandro , p. 18. Alexid , p. 34. Alphonsus de Avendano , p. 134. Ambrosius , p. 10 , 68 , 135. Ambrosius Ansbertus , p. 112. Anabaptists , p. 100 , 101. Antiochus Palest . p. 109. Anthelmus Cantuar ▪ p. 120. Tho. Aquinas , p. 115 , 132. Aristophanes , p. 102. Aristoteles , p. 18. Athanasius , p. 50 , 54. Augustinus , p. 10 , 95 , 132 , 133. M. Aurelius Antoninus , p. 36. Ausonius , p. 36. B Bagool , pag. 100. Baptista Folengius , p. 115. Baro●ius , p. 100 , 121. Basil . Magnus , p. 10 , 60 , 100. Basilides , p. 41. J. Bechet , p. 124. Beda , p. 110 , 141. Counc . Berghamsted , p. 111. Bernard , p. 100 , 113 , 115 137 , 144. Beza , p. 102 , 141. Bible folio , printed 1578. p. 144. Bible 4 to . printed 1559. 143. Biblioth vet . patr . p. 116. Blandina , p. 41 , 45. Blastaris , p. 62 , 111. Brugensis , p. 10 , 115. Otho Brunfelfius , p. 114. Beat Bruno , p. 46. Wal. Brute , p. 123. J. Burrel , p. 126. C Cajetan , p. 133 , 135. Caesarius , p. 67. Joac . Camerar ▪ p. 143. Gui. Carmelite , p. 100. Cassiodorus , p. 46 , 108. Castro , p. 100 , 141. Caten . 65. Graec. Patr. p. 108. Cathari , p. 100. Hug. Cardinal . p. 115. Pet. Charron , p. 144 Geff. Chaucer , p. 122. Cheril , p. 33. Chromatius , 10 , 104. Chrysostom , p. 10 , 11 , 17 , 50.70 , 100 , 112 , 120 , 141. Cicero , p. 18 , 33. Clemens Alexandr . p. 15 , 43 , 47. Clemens Roman . p. 58 , 101 , 142. J. Clements , p. 124. Clineas , p. 31 , 62. Qu. Curtius , p. 29. Cyprian , p. 51. Cyril , p. 107. D J. Damascen . pag. 107. Diodorus Siculus , p. 28. Diogenes Laert. p. 33. Druthmarus , p. 114 , 141. E Archiep. Ebur . Egbert , p. 111. J. Edward , p. 124. Epictetus , p. 34. Epiphanius , p. 50 , 67. Erasmus , p. 128. Esseni , p. 37. Eusebius , p. 40 , 41 , 99. Evagrius Scholast . p. 104 , 107. F Jacob Faber , p. 138. Festus ad Lapidem , p. 18. J. Fox Martyrol . pag. 121 , 122 , 123.124 , 125 , 128. G Bp. Gauden , p. 10 , 14 , 30 , 154. Gentian Hervet . p. 48. Gennadius , p. 99 Gloss . Ordin . p. 107 , 115. Hug. Grotius , p. 31 , 34 , 37 , 150. H J.M. Hadingtonian . p. 143. Haimo , p. 112. Hercules , p. 29. Hesiod , p. 29. R. Herbert , p. 124. Hierocles , p. 31. Hilary , p. 50 , 57 Hilary Syracus . p. 100. Huetius , p. 50. Humiliati , p. 100. J. Huss , p. 126. I James on the Fathers , pag. 78. Jansenius , p. 100 , 114. Jerom , p. 11 , 92 , 127 , 136 , 141 , 143. Jews Antiquities , p. 154. Josephus , p. 37 , 136. Justin Martyr , p. 41. Irenaeus , p. 97. Isidorus Pelusiot . p. 104. Isodor . Hispalens . p. 109. Isocrates , p. 32. K Hist . ref . Kirk Scotland , p. 127. L Lactantius , p. 43. Laertius Hermip . p. 30. Libanius , p. 36. Lindenbrogius , p. 18. Lodovicus Pius , p. 148. Lollards , pag. 127. Lotharius , p. 148. Ludulphus , p. 10 , 115 , Luitprandus , p. 158. N. Lyra , p. 106 , 115. Lysander , p. 32. M Maimonides , pag. 37. Menander , p. 33. Maldonat , p. 101. 144. Manichees , p. 100. Marlorat , p. 144. Fra. de Mendoca , p. 136. Archiep. Mentz . p. 111. S. Morland , p. 128. N Grave of Nassou , p. 160 , 161. G. Nazianzen , pag. 42. 64 , Nicodemus's Gospel , p. 59 Nilus , p. 107. G. Nyssen●s , p. 63.141 . O Oecumenius , pag. 119. Olympiodorus , p. 108. Prince of Orange , p. 162. Origen , p. 30 , 49 , 100 , 101. Orthodoxographa . p. 59. P Paschatius Ratbertus , p. 113. Patrini , pag. 100. Pelagians , p. 100 , 101 Persians , p. 28. Philo Judaeus , p. 36 , 38 , 138 , 146. Plato , p. 32. Plinius , p. 18. Plowman's Complaint , p. 121. Plutarch , p. 29 , 32 , 35. Polybius , p. 10 , 18. Polycarpus , p. 40 , 45. Ponticus , p. 41 , 45. Potamicna , p. 42. Jer. of Prague , p. 126. Prateolus , p. 100. Le Pricur , p. 45. Protestants of Piedmont , p. 128. Publicani , p. 100. J. Purrey , p. 124. Pythagoras , p. 30 , 31. Q Quintilian , p. 34 R Rabanus , p. 107 , 115. Raimundus , pag. 37. Reiner . p. 120. Remigius , p. 115. Rhadamanthus , p. 32. Rigaltius , p. 46. Ruffinus , p. 115. Rupertus , p. 115. S Mich. Sadler , pag. 127. Ger. Sagarel , p. 128. Grae. Sages , p. 30. Rob. Sanderson , p. 20 , 101 , 104. W. Sawtree , p. 126. Scapula , p. 102. Scultetus , p. 43 , 46. Scythians , p. 29. Simocat . p. 34. Smaragdus , p. 115 Sociad . p. 30. Socrat. Schol. pag. 51 , 60 , 63 , 71. Solon , p. 30. Lod. Soto Major , p. 144. H. Spelman , p. 111. Spotswood , p. 127. Stobaeus , p. 30 , 34. Swarez , p. 47 , 58 , 100 , 140. W. Swinderby , p. 122. Jer. Taylor , pag. 155. Tertullian , p. 42 , 52 , 100. Gr. Thaumaturgus , p. 51. Theodoret , p. 11. 106. Theognis , p. 30. Theophylact , p. 100 , 113 , 141. W. Thorp , p. 124 , 126. Titelmannus , p. 10. Treatise of Peace , p. 163. Archiep. Triers , p. 111. V Valerius Max. p. 30 , 33. Villerius , p. 143. Vossius , p. 100. J. Usher , p. 100 , 121 , 128 , 152. W Walden , p. 100. Waldenses , p. 100 , 120. Bp. Walton , p. 102. W. White , p. 126. J. Wickliff , p. 121. Wickliffists , p. 101. Widsord , p. 100 Em. Willy , p. 124. X Xenocrates , p. 33 , 15. Xenophon , p. 102. Y Eliz. Young , p. 125. Z Euthymius Zagabonus , p. 126. Some Inducements Offer'd TO Answer this REQVEST , From a Consideration of the Cause and End of an Oath , And those REASONS AND TESTIMONIES , Given by us against the USE and IMPOSITION of it . The GROUND or Reason of Swearing . THis ( we think ) all will agree to have been the Degeneration of Man from primitive Integrity , at what time Yea and Nay were enough ; for when men grew corrupt , they distrusted each other , and had recourse to extraordinary Wayes to awe one another into Truth's-speaking , as a Remedy against Falseness ; else , what need had there been of an Oath , or any Extraordinary Way of Evidence , when every Syllable was freighted with Truth and Integrity ? It had been a meer taking of God's Holy Name in vain : Truth then flowed naturally , and wanted no such Expedient to Extort its Evidence . Thus , * Polybius , though an Heathen , in his Story of the Romans , saith , Among the Ancients Oaths were seldom used in Judicatures themselves ; but when Perfidiousness increased , Oaths increased , or then the Use of them first came in . Basilius Magnus saith , Oaths are an Effect of Sin. Gregorius Nazianzonus in his Dialogue against Swearing , saith , An Oath is nothing else but a certain consumation of Mischiefs . Ambrosius saith , Swearing is only in Condescension to a Defect . Chrysostom saith , An Oath came in when Evils increased , when men appeared unfaithful , when all things became Topsy Turvy . Again , To swear is of the Devil , seeing Christ saith , What is more ( then Yea , &c. ) is of Evil. Swearing took its Beginning for want of Truth or Punctuality . Augustin saith , An Oath is not among good , but Evil Things , and used for the Infirmity of others which is Evil , from which we pray that we may be daily delivered . Chromatius saith , What need we swear , seeing it is unlawful to Lye. Which shows that Lying was the Occasion of Oaths , and by leaving off Lying , Oaths vanquish as unprofitable . Titelmannus saith , that an Oath belongs not to Virtue . Albertus Magnus saith , Swearing is by Indulgence . Ludulphus saith , An Oath was permitted of Infirmity . Burgensis cites Jerome saying , Our Saviour teacheth that an Oath sprung from the Vices of Men. Bp. Gauden also tells us , That the Evils of mens Hearts and Manners , the Jealousies and Distrusts , the Dissimulations and Frauds of many Christians , their Vncharitableness and Insecurities are such , as by their Diseases do make solemn Oaths and judicial Swearing necessary , not ABSOLUTELY ▪ MORALLY or PRECEPTIVELY ; but as a Remedy or Expedient . Jerom ( with many of the Fathers , Chrysostom , Theodoret , and others here omitted , because largly cited hereafter ) make this the Reason why God indulged the Jews in the Use of Swearing , That they were but in the State of Infancy , and that they might be kept from Swearing by false Gods ; which the Scripture is plain in : For thou shalt fear the Lord thy God , and swear by HIS Name ; Ye shall not go after other Gods , for God is a Jealous God , &c. Which shews , that he dispensed with Swearing by his Name , that he might take them off from Swearing by False God's , because they would thereby acknowledge them , and not the True God ; so that Swearing is only better then Idolatry . It will remain that we give our REASONS why we cannot take this Liberty , and Swear , as well as other Men have done , and yet do . I. THe first is drawn from the Cause and Ground of Oaths , viz. Perfidiousness , Distrust and Falshood : God's Injunctions to avoid those hateful Crimes ; The Ability he hath given man to answer his Commands ; and Man's Duty to make that use of God's Gift : For if Swearing came in by Perfidiousness , Distrust , Dissimulation and Falshood , it is a most just Consequence that it ought to go out with them ; or that as the Rise and Increasing of those Evils were the Rise and Increasing of Oaths ; so the Decreasing and Extirpation of those Evils should be the Decreasing and Abolishing of Oaths ; otherwise there would be no Truth in the Rule of Contraries , nor Reason in that ancient Maxim , Cessante ratione Legis cessat lex ; That the Ceasing of the Reason of the Law is the Cessation of the Law : Expedients are no longer useful then to obtain what they are designed to . Means are swallowed up of their Ends ; Diseased Men only want Remedies , and Lame Men Crutches ; Honesty needs neither Whip nor Spur , She is Security for her self ; and Men of Virtue will speak Truth without Extortings ; for Oaths are a sort of Racks to the Mind , altogether useless where Integrity swayes . This we presume no man of Reason will deny , viz. That Swearing came in , and ought to go out with Perfidiousness ; and we hope it will be as easie to grant , at least it will be very easie to prove , That God hath frequently , both by Prophets and Apostles , reproved men for such Impieties , and strictly required Truth and Righteousness ; as , Isa . 59 , 3 , 4. Jer. 9.3 , 5. Rom. 12.19 . Gal. 5.19 , 20 , 21. Col. 3 8 , 9 , 10. Josh . 24.14 . 1 Sam. 12.24 . 1 King. 2.4 . Eph. 4.25 . and by abundance of other Places in Holy Scripture . And that God should enjoyn man any thing that he hath not impowered him to perform , is unworthy of any man acknowledging a God , so much as to conceive . It is true , that the unprofitable Servant in the Parable is represented to entertain so blasphemous a Thought of his Maker , that he was so hard a Master , as to reap where he did not sow ; but the same Parable also acquaints us of the dreadful Consequence of that Presumption : The Prophet Micha preached another Doctrine , The Lord hath shewed thee , O Man , what is good : and what doth the Lord require of thee , but to do Justly , to love Mercy , and to walk Humbly with thy God ? For this End hath the Grace of God appeared unto all Men , as speaks the Apostle Paul to Titus , that they should be taught to deny Vngodliness and Wor●dly Lusts , which entering & over-running the World , made way among other Expedients for that of Oaths ; so that to live that Life which needs No Oath , man is both requir'd and impower'd : And as it is only his Fault and Condemnation , if he doth not ; so certainly there can be no Obligation upon him who liveth that Life of Truth and Intetegrity to perpetuate that which rose , and therefore ought to fall with Falshood and Perfidiousness : the Reason of the thing it self excuses him ; for , he that fears Untruth , needs not swear , because he will not lye , to prevent which men exact Swearing : And he that doth not fear telling Untruth , what is his Oath worth ? He that makes no Conscience of that Law that forbids Lying , will he make any Conscience of Forswearing ? Veracity is the best Security ; and Truth speaking the Noblest Tye and Firmest Testimony that can be given . This we declare to you to be both our Judgment and Attainment ; We speak not Boastingly , but with Humility before the Great Lord of Heaven and Earth , to whose alone Power we do unanimously asscribe the Honour : He hath taught us to speak the Truth , the whole Truth , and nothing but the Truth , as plainly and readily without an Oath as with an Oath , and to abhor Lying as much as Perjury ; so that for us to swear , were to take his Holy Name in vain : Nor are we therein singular ; for that not only Christian Fathers , Mar - and Doctors , but also Jews and Heathens have had this Sense of the Rise and Use of Oaths , as will hereafter fully appear . II. Our second Reason , why we refuse to comply with this Custom , and our Superiours ought not to impose it , is this , It would Gratifie Distrusts , Humor Jealousies , and Subject Truth , and those that love it , to the same Checks , Curbs and Preventions that have been invented against Fraud ; whereby the Honour of a Nobler Profession , the Power of a veracious Example , and the just Difference that ought to be made betwixt Trustiness and Diffidence , Integrity and Perfidiousness , are utterly lost ▪ How is is possible for men to recover that ancient Confidence that good men reposed in one another , if some don't lead the Way , and hold forth to the World a Principle and Conversation beyond the Necessity of such extraordinary Expedients ? At present People lie all in a Heap ; and the Greatest Truth finds no more Favour then the greatest Fraud ; Fidelity must wear the Shackles worldly Prudence hath made against the Evil Consequences of Couzennage , and subject her self to the Customs brought up through Fraud , or go to Gaol . Be pleased to consider , that Trustiness did not all at once quit the World , nor will it return universally in the Twinkle of an Eye ; Things must be allowed their Time for Rise , Progress and Perfection : And if ever you would see the World planted with Primitive Simplicity and Faithfulness , rather cherish then make men Sufferers for Refusing to Swear , especially if they offer the same Caution to the Law with him that will swear . We dare not Swear because we dare not Lye , and that it may appear to the World , that we can speak the Truth upon easier Terms then an Oath : For us then to be forc'd to swear , is to make us do a needless thing , or to suspect our own Honesty . The first we dare not , because , as we have said , it is to take God's Name in vain ; and we have no Reason to distrust our selves , being no wayes conscious of fraudulent Purposes : Why then should we swear ? But much rather , why should we be imposed upon ? It is a Saying asscribed to Solon , That a good man should have that Repute as not to need an Oath ; that it is a Diminution to his Credit to be put to Swear . It becomes not an Evangelical Man to Swear , was a primitive Axiom ; but more of that anon : In the mean while please to remember , you have a Practice among you , to exempt your Lords in several Cases , placing the Value of an Oath in their bare Avouchment upon their Honour , supposing that men of those Titles should have so much Worth , as that their Word might be of equal Force with a Common Man's Oath : And if you will please to understand Honour in the Sense of the most ancient and best of Philosophers , to wit , VIRTVE , your own Custom gives Authority to our Reason , & makes you to say with us , That Virtue needs not Swear , much less have Oaths imposed upon her , to tell Truth , the only Use of Oaths . It was Evangelically spoaken of Clemens Alexandrinus , That a Good Life is a firm Oath ; which was memorably verified by the Judges of Athens , who , though Heathens , forbad the Tendering of Xenocrates an Oath , because of their great Opinion of his Integrity , which was Three Hundred Years before Christ came in the Flesh . III. Our third Reason for Non conformity to your Custom is , the Fear we have , lest by Complying we should be guilty of Rebellion against the Discoveries God hath made to our Souls of his ancient holy Way of Truth ; & consequently of concealing his Goodness to us , and depriving him of that Glory & the World of that Advantage this honest Testimony may bring to him & them . He has redeem'd us from Fraud ; 'T is he only that hath begotten this Conscientiousness in us ; and we dare not put this Light under a Bushel , neither can we deny his Work , or him to have the Honour of it . We intreat you , take this Tenderness of ours into Christian Consideration . IV. Oaths have in great measure lost of the Reason of their primitive Institution , since they have not that Awful Influence which was and only can be a Pretence for using them ; on the contrary , they are become the familiar parts of Discourse , and help to make up a great share of the A la mode Conversation : and those who decline their Company , or reprove their Practice , are to go for a sort of Nice and squ●amish Conscienc'd Men. These Swear without Fear or Wit , yet would be thought Witty in Swearing , Fearless they can't : Some are curious in their Impiety ; Old Oaths are too dull for men of their Invention , who almost shift Oaths with their Fashions : Nay , the most judicial Oaths are commonly administred and taken with so little Reverence and Devotion ( to say nothing of the Perjuries , that through Ignorance or Design , are too frequently committed ) that we can't but cry out , Oh the great Depravity that is in the World ! How low is Man faln from the primitive Rule of Life ? Well may the Prophet's Complaint be ours , for , If ever Land mourned because of OATHS , with great Sadness we say it , this doth . And what more effectual Remedy can any People propose against the notorious Abuse and evil Consequence of Swearing , then Truth-speaking ? for those that dare not Lye , need not Swear ; and they that make no Conscience of Lying , do not much fear an Oath , at least their Consciences are very crazy in taking it . This only Reason , were we destitute of all other Allegations , would be a strong Disswasive from Swearing ; for we hold God's Honour , and our Profession greatly concern'd to prove to so False an Age , that there is a People who are so far from vain and false Swearing , that they dare not swear the Truth ; but whose Yea and Nay shall weigh against other mens Oaths , and that with a free Offer of sustaining double Punishment in case of Miscarriage . Expedients may last a while , but TRVTH only shall have the Honour of conquering Falshood , and Virtue will and must be greater then an OATH . V. The Omnipresency of God rightly understood , shows the Uselesness of an Oath , and is with us a good Argument against Swearing ; for what need is there of that Man's being aw'd into true Evidence by such sort of Attestations and Imprecations as make up the common Form of Oaths , who knows God to be always present to reside and preside in his Soul , according to that New and Everlasting Covenant which he hath made , that his People should be his Temple , that he would dwell IN them , and walk IN them . Did the Children of men know the Power , Glory and Majesty of God , WHOM the Apostle preacht NIGH to the Athenians , and declared to the Ephesians to be Father of all , above all , through all and IN THEM ALL , there would be no Oaths , and but few Words , and those utter'd with Reverence and Truth . VI. We do not find that Oaths answer this part of the End for which they are imposed , viz. To convince those for whose sakes they are taken , of the Weight and Truth of a Man's Testimony by Force of God's Witness joyn'd therewith : For they don't behold God's concurring Witness by such an Assistance or Avenge of that Party , as the Truth or Falshood of his Testimony deserveth ; for the Judgments of God are secret , and rarely so publickly seen to Men , perhaps once in an Age , that he should give any memorable Discovery of his good Will or Displeasure in such a Case ; but whenever he doth it , it is not at Man's Appointment : And it is an evident Sign that God approveth not of that sort of Invocation , because he doth not answer them that invoke him , according to their Wish ; as neither did he in the old Law or Custom of Combating appear on his side that had the better Title or Cause , as he promised in the Law of Jealousie , that their Thigh should rot , and their Belly swell , &c. VII . We look upon it to be no less then a presumtuous Tempting of God , To summon him as a Witness , not only to our Terrene , but trivial Businesses ; such as we should doubtless account it an high Indignity alwaies to solicit an Earthly Prince to give his Attendence about . What! Make God , the Great God of Heaven and Earth our Caution in worldly Controversies , as if we would bind him to obtain our own Ends ? It is to make too bold with him , and to carry an undue Distance in our Minds towards him that made us ; An Irreverence we can by no means away with , and upon which Chrysostom is most sharp , as will be seen anon . Besides it is vain and insolent to think that a man when he pleaseth , can make the Great God of Heaven a Witness or a Judge in any matter to appear by some signal Approbation or Judgment , to help or forsake him , as the Truth or Falseness of his Oath requires , when he saith , So help me God. VIII . Besides what we have hitherto urged in Defence of our selves against the Substance of the Oath , we justly except against the Form of it ( which further adds to its Unlawfulness , and consequently to our Vindication ) as by the Contents and kissing of the Book ; Swearing by a Sign , being Heathenish or Jewish . For the Romans held a Stone , and said , If I deceive wittingly then let Diespiter cast me out of my Goods , as I this Stone : The Heroes swore by lifting up of the Scepter : Caesar swore by his Head , his House , that is , consecrated them to the Wrath of God , if he wittingly deceived , &c. The manner of the Jews is from Gen. 14.22 . that Abraham lift up his hand to God , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , If , &c. putting the Hand under the Thigh , on the Head ; passing betwixt Beasts divided , as God did to Abraham , &c. see more in Lapid . Sophoc . in Antiq. v. 270. Scoliast . Baptist . Hansen of passing through Fire , swearing by the right Hand , &c. The Use of So help me God , we find from the Law of the Almans , of King Clotharius : The laying on of three Fingers above the Book is to signifie the Trinity ; the Thumb and the little Finger under the Book , are to signifie the Damnation of Body and Soul , if they forswear , So help me God. Further be pleased to consider that the English Custom has very much overgone English Law in this Business of Oaths ; they were anciently but solemn Attestations , As the Lord liveth , &c. which are now improv'd to Imprecations , So help me God and the Contents of this Book : Though it was ●o of old at Combat ; but that concerns not our Case . For the Kissing of the Book , that is also Novil : Indeed after they rise from solemn Attestations to Imprecations , the Law required a Sight and Touch of the Book ; The Saxon Jurors were Sacratenentes ; In the first Norman Times it was Sacris tactis ; and in later Writs , Evangeliis tactis ; nay , the Priest's Hand was on his Breast ( in Matthew Paris ) not upon the Book . However Jew and Gentile , Superstition and Ceremony , have made up the present Form of Oaths , which the true Christian-man neither wants , nor we conceive , ought to perform ; much less impose where Tenderness by sober Consciences is pleaded , and equal Caution offer'd to the Law for the Integrity of Yea and Nay . IX . But were we also destitute of this Plea , and the usual Oaths of our Country the most inoffensively form'd , and best penn'd that ever any were , we have both the Example and Precept of our Lord and Saviour , Jesus Christ , to oppose to any such Practice ; for in all that History delivered to us by the four Evangelists , we never read him to have used any further Asseveration then what in English amounts to Verely , Verely , or Truly , Truly , I say unto you : Thus by his Example exciting us the more readily to obey his express Prohibition of Swearing , Mat. 5.33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37. which runs thus , Again , Ye have heard that it has been said by them of old time , Thou shalt not forswear thy self , but shalt perform unto the Lord thine Oathes ; but I say unto you , SWEAR NOT AT ALL ; neither by Heaven , for it is God's Throne ; nor by the Earth , for it is his Footstool ; neither by Jerusalem , for it is the City of the great King ; neither shalt thou swear by thy Head , because thou ca●st not make one Hair white or black ; but let your Word be YEA , YEA ; NAY , NAY ; for whatsoever is MORE then THESE cometh OF EVIL . He here prohibits even the lesser Oaths , as They thought them that reverenced Swearing by the Name of the Lord , which in old time he suffer'd by reason of the Falseness of their Hearts , and great Pronness to Idols ; even as Moses permitted them to put away their Wives , which in the precedent Verse also is disallowed by Christ , though with the Exception of Fornication ; but Swearing without any Exception : He doth not say , Swear not except before a Magistrate ( though he says , Put not away thy Wife , except for the Cause of Fornication ) but SWEAR NOT AT ALL : why ? because it is OF EVIL ; which reason reaches the Oaths taken before Magistrates , as well as other Oaths ; for Distrust & Unfaithfulness are the Cause of one as well as the other : And there is equal Reason in that respect , that a Master should swear in private to his Servant at his Entrance , that he will pay him his Wages , as that the Servant should swear in publick to a Magistrate , that at his Departure his Master would not pay him his Wages ; both which Oaths the Certainty of their Words , their Yea being Yea , and their Nay being Nay , makes vain and superfluous . Obj. We are not unsensible of the common Objection that is made against this Allegation of our Master's Command , That he only prohibited Vain Oaths in Communication : But if the words of the Text and Context be consider'd , every Oath will be proved Vain and Vnlawful ; for Christ's Prohibition was not a meer Repetition of what was forbidden under the Law , but what the Law allowed , as Bp. Sanderson well observeth ; It was not needful that Christ should forbid what was forbidden in it self , or was alwayes Vnlawful , which vain Swearing was and is by the third Commandment , Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord thy God in vain ; therefore Christ exceded the Prohibition of the Law : And the whole Chapter is a Demonstration of a more excellent Righteousness then that which either needed or used Oaths ; for Christ brings Adultery from the Act to the Thought ; in lieu of Revenge he commands Suffering , and extends Charity not only to Friends , but Enemies ; so in the Place controverted , in the room of such Oaths & Vows as ought to be perform'd unto the Lord , he introduces Yea and Nay , with a most absolute SWEAR NOT AT ALL. This was the Advance he made in his excellent Sermon upon the Mount ; he wound up things to an higher pitch of Sanctity then under the Law , or the childish State of the Jews could receive . Again , saith he , Ye have heard of old time , thou shalt not Forswear thy self , but shalt perform unto the Lord thine Oaths ; but I say unto you , SWEAR NOT AT ALL ; as plain , general and emphatical a Prohibition as can be found in Holy Scripture . However , those Persons that usually advocate for the Continuance of Oaths under the Gospel , tell us , it is not a general Prohibition , but is limited to Swearing by Creatures , either by Heaven , Earth , Jerusalem or Head , &c. VVhich is wholy inconsistent with the Scope of the Place , as we shall make appear from these Four Considerations : 1 st , The Prohibition reaches as well to serious as vain Oaths , such as men made , if they swore at all , and ought to make to God only ; for to him alone should they perform them , and are they accountable for them : These very allowed Oaths of Old Time , are the first prohibited by Jesus Christ ; It was said of Old , thou shalt not Forswear thy self ; but I say , SWEAR NOT AT ALL. 'T is true , it is not particularized what Oaths they were to keep of old ; but in general Terms , that they were not to Forswear themselves ; and it is clear that God enjoyned them that would Swear , that they should only Swear by his Name . Now what can be hence inferred more evidently , then that men ought not to swear those Oaths under the Gospel , which they might swear , and ought not to forswear , but to perform unto the Lord in the Law. 2 dly , Christ himself gives the Explanation of his own Words , Chap. 23.16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22. where he teacheth us , That he that swears by the Temple , swears by it , and by him that dwells therein ; and he that shall swear by Heaven , swears by the Throne of God , and by him that sits thereon : So that he that swears by the Head , swears by him that made it : and he that swears by the Earth , swears by him that created it ; which leaves no room for the Objection , for it is as if Christ should have said , I not only command you not to Forswear , but perform , as it was said to them of old time ; but I charge you , NOT TO SWEAR AT ALL : I mean , not only that you should not swear by God , and those Oaths that the Pharisees account binding ; but also that you should not so much as swear by those lesser Oaths , as they esteem them , and which they are wont to swear by ; for they are not less nor more allowable , in that they that swear by them , swear by him that is the Author and Maker of them : wherefore being of the same Nature with the other , I forbid you to swear by them as well as by those Oaths that were of old time made , and ought not to be broak , but perform'd unto the Lord ; for this is one of my great Commandments , which they must keep that will be my Disciples , that is to say , SWEAR NOT AT ALL. Our 3 d Inducement to believe this to have been the Intention of our Lord Jesus Christ , is the concurrent Testimony of the Apostle James , which is not only a Repetition of his Master's Doctrine , but an Addition and Illustration , we hope sufficient to determin the present Question with every unprejudic'd Reader ; But above all things , my Brethren ( saith he ) swear not ; which runs parallel with Swear not at all : The Negative is as general & forcible . He proceeds , neither by Heaven , neither by the Earth ; Words of equal Import with the latter part of Christ's Prohibition : and as if he had foreseen the Cavils of our Swearing Adversaries , he adds , neither by any other Oath ; which though as clear as the Sun , if yet for their last shift they should tell us , that he only meant any other Oath of that kind , not that he prohibited Swearing by the Name of the Lord , it will not do their Business ; for that Christ hath already assured us , Whosoever swears by Heaven , swears by him that sits thereon ; and the very next words show that it was not his Design only to prohibit vain , but plainly to exclude all Swearing , But let your Yea be Yea , and your Nay , Nay , lest ye fall into Condemnation ; else why had he not said , but you may swear by the Name of God before a Magistrate ? Why must Neither by any other Oath be added after such a plain Prohibition , as , My Brethren , Above all things Swear not ? And why must Yea and Nay be substituted in the room of an Oath , if it was yet intended by the Apostle , that Christians might rise higher in their Evidence then a bare Affirming or Denying ? that is , Though their Yea be never so truly Yea , and their Nay never so sincerely Nay , or the very Truth of the Matter be spoaken , which is the Import of the Words ; yet that they ought to swear . What is this but to contradict the natural Tendency of the Command of Christ and his Apostles ? which is plainly this ; If your Yea be Yea , it is enough ; if your Nay be Nay , it is sufficient ; for Christians ought not to swear , if they do , they fall into Condemnation , in that they break their Master's Command , who hath told them , that Whatsoever is more then Yea or Nay , cometh of Evil , which is the Ground of all Oaths ; for they ought to mean so simply and honestly in what they say , as that they should never need to swear in order to tell the Truth . Our 4 th and last Consideration , and that which to us seemeth of great Moment to clear up our Lord and Saviour's sense , and rescue the Passage from the Violence of Objectors , is this Clause , For whatsoever is MORE then Yea , Yea , and Nay , Nay , cometh of Evil. This cannot be intended of more Words then Yea , Yea , and Nay , Nay , provided they are not of an higher Strain , but of the same Degree of Speach importing a plain Assertion or Denyal of a thing ; for it is not the Number , but Nature of the Words spoaken , that is here prohibited : Nor can it be only understood of Perjury ; for every body knows that to be evil in it self , which is more then that which cometh OF , or because of Evil : Therefore ▪ it must be understood as well of Swearing , as of Forswearing , which is not Evil it self , yet cometh of , or by Reason of Evil in the World : Nor is there any thing more then Yea and Nay besides Perjury , which can be intended , but an Oath ; and therefore that was intended . Christ doth not only prohibit Evil it self , but that which is Evil by Superfluity to Evangelical Sincerity , and that Swearing is ( be it of what sort it will ) wherever Yea is Yea , and Nay is Nay . In short , If what is More then Yea and Nay , cometh of Evil ; then because any Swearing , as well as Forswearing , is more then Yea and Nay ; it follows , that any Swearing cometh of Evil , and therefore ought to be rejected of Christians . Nor will our English Translation of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 shelter our Objectors : For , Communication doth not exclude those many Cases that require Evidences among men , no nor any the least Action of Man's Life ; on the contrary , they have a great Place in Human Communication , which is comprehensive of the various Discourses and Transactions of a Man's Life , as 2 Kings 9.11 . 2 Sam. 3.17 . Eph. 4.29 . Col. 3.8 . 1 Cor. 15.33 . It is a word of the same Extent with Conversation , which takes in all that can happen between man and man in this World : Thus the Psalmist , To him that ordereth his Conversation aright , Psalm 50.23 . So the Apostle , Let your Conversation be as becomes the Gospel , Phil. 1.27 . Besides , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may be rendred Word , as in Joh. 1.1 . and the Italian and French Translations have it , Let your Word be Yea , Yea ; Nay , Nay ; as much as if Christ had said , As I do not only condemn the Act for Adultery , which the Law did , but also the Conception of the Mind ; and not only Murder , but Revenge likewise ; so I do not only condemn Forswearing , which is done to my hand in the Law of God , but prohibit Swearing at all ; for I make that to be Unlawful , which the Law doth not call Unlawful : Therefore when your Evidence is called for , Swear not at all , but let your Word be Yea , Yea , and Nay , Nay ; that is , Do not speak Untruth ; for that is Evil : Don't Swear ; for that comes of Evil. To conclude ; People swear to the End they may speak Truth ; Christ would have men speak Truth , to the End they might not swear : he would not have his Followers upon such base Reserves , but their Word to carry the Weight of an Oath in it ; that as others ought not to be guilty of Perjury , Christians ought not to be guilty of Lying : For such is the Advance from Moses to Christ , Jew to Christian , that as the Christian needs not the Jew's Curb , so his Lye is greater then the Jew's Perjury , because his Yea or Nay ought to be of more Value then the other's Oath . X. And lastly ; Besides these express Prohibitions , Swearing is forbidden by the very Nature of Christianity , and unworthy of him that is the Author of it , who came not to implant so imperfect a Religion , as that which needed Oaths , or should leave Fraud , the Ground of Swearing , unextirpated ; but to promulgate that Gospel which retrives ancient Sincerity , builds up Waste Places , restores those Breaches Oaths entred at , and leads into the Ancient Holy Paths of Integrity they never trod in : He is that Powerful Lord , which cureth the Diseases of all them that come unto him , and Mystical Serpent exalted , that relieves all that believingly look up to him : His Office is to make an End of Sin , that made way for Swearing , and introduce that Everlasting Righteousness which never needs it ; The Religion he taught , is no less then Regeneration and Perfection ; such Veracity as hath not the least Wavering ; Sincerity throughout , that it might not only exceed the Righteousness of the Swearing Jews , but that Law which permitted it till the Times of Restitution , which he brought to the Degenerated World , who said , Swear not at all ; for the Law that permitted Oaths ; was given by Moses ; but Grace and Truth , that ends them , came by Jesus Christ , who therefore prohibits them . And not only is this Gospel of Christ , or the Holy Religion he taught , of so pure and excellent a Nature ; but those who will be his Disciples , are oblieged to obey it , insomuch that he himself hath said , If ye love me , keep my Commandments ; and if ye keep my Commandments , ye shall abide in my Love. Again , Ye are my Friends , if ye do whatsoever I command you : If any man will come after me , let him deny himself , and take up his Cross , and follow me : For I say unto you , that except your Righteousness shall exceed the Righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees , ye shall in no Case enter the Kingdom of Heaven : Be ye therefore Perfect , even as your Father which is in Heaven is perfect . These are the weighty Sayings of our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ ; and certainly , he who breaks not the least Commandment ( forbidden Vers . 19. ) who can Suffer rather then Revenge , love Enemies , and be perfect as his Heavenly Father is perfect , is above the Obligation of an Oath unto Truth-speaking . His Disciples preacht not another Gospel then their Master's , who prayed , that those who believed might be sanctified THROUGHOUT , in Body , Soul and Spirit , which is a perfect Removal of the Ground of Swearing ; and they were exhorted to press after the Mark of the Price of this High and Holy Calling , until they should all come unto a perfect Man , unto the Measure of the Stature of the Fulness of Christ Jesus : For even hereunto ( saith Peter ) were ye called , because Christ also suffered for us , leaving us an Example , that ye should follow his Steps , who did no Sin , neither was Guile found in his Mouth : And saith John , As he is , so are we in this World. If No Guile be found in our Mouths , then No Oaths ; for they came because of Guile : And if we ought to resemble him in this World , then must our Communication be Yea , Yea , and Nay , Nay ; that is , we must live the Life of Truth , and speak the Words of Truth , which ought to be of greater Force then Oaths , that come of Evil. If the Righteousness of the Law ought to be fulfilled in us , we ought not to swear , because we ought to be so Righteous as not to Lye. This is Evangelical ; for as he that conceives not a foul or revengeful Thought , need not to purge himself of Adultery and Murder : Neither is there any Reason , that man should purge himself of Lying by Sweating , that doth not so much as countenance an untrue Thought . The Language of the same Apostle to the Ephesians further explains this Evangelical Evidence , But ye have not so learned Christ , if so be that ye have heard him , & have been taught by him , as the Truth is in Jesus ; That ye put off concerning the former Conversation the Old Man , which is Corrupt , according to the Deceitful Lusts , & be renewed in the Spirit of your Mind , & that you put on the New Man , which after God is created in Righteousness and true Holiness : Wherefore PVTTING AWAY LYING , SPEAK EVERY MAN TRVTH with his Neighbour : Beyond which , there can be no Assurance given or desired . And if Christians ought never to Lye , it is most certain they need never to Swear ; for Swearing is built upon Lying ; Take away Lying , and there remains no more Ground for Swearing ; Truth-speaking comes in the room thereof : And this not only the Christian-Doctrine teaches and requires ; but Christ , the blessed Author of it , is ready to work in the Hearts of the Children of Men , would they but come and learn of him , who is Meek , Lowly , filled with Grace and Truth . And we must needs say , It is a shameful thing , and very Dishonourable to the Christian-Religion , that those who pretend themselves to be the Followers of Christ , for so true Christians ought to be , should so degenerate from his Example and Doctrine as to want and use scarcing Asseverations , dispenced with in some of the weakest Times of Knowledge , and such horrible Imprecations ( never known to ancient Jews and Christians ) to ascertain one another of their Faith and Truth : Religion must needs have suffered a great Ebb , and Christianity a fearful Ecclips since those brighter Ages of its Profession : For Bishop Gauden himself , in his Discourse of Oaths , confesses , That the ancient Christians were so strict and exact , that there was no need of an Oath among them ; yea , they so kept up the Sanctity and Credit of their Profession among Vnbelievers , that it was Security enough in all Cases to say , Christianus sum , I am a Christian . But to fortifie what we have hitherto urged in Defence of our Judgment and Practice ; and to the End it may more fully appear , that our Tenderness in this great Case of Oaths comes not from any Sower , Sullen or Superstitious Humor , or that we would trouble the World with any New fangled Opinion , we shall produce the concurrent Testimonies of several Famous and Good Men for above these Two Thousand Years , among Gentiles , Jews and Christians , enough to make an Occumenical Council ; We shall cite them out of the best Editions we have been able to procure , and as truly and punctually as we can render them , digested in Order of Time. Memorable TESTIMONIES against Swearing , collected out of the Writings of Gentiles , Jews & Christians ; some of which were deliver'd to the World several Ages before Swear not at all was writ by Matthew , or spoaken by Christ ; which makes Swearing , but especially Punishing for not Swearing , among Christians , so much the more Disallowable . The Whole publisht not only in Favour of our Cause ; but for the Instruction of the World , and to their Just Honour that said & writ them , as durable Monuments of their Virtue . I. The Sayings of the Gentiles or Heathens , in Dislike of Oaths . Our two first Testimonies shall be the Practice of two great People , the Persians and Scythian : . Diodorus Siculus , lib. 16. I. AMong the Persians , saith Diodorus Siculus , Giving the Right Hand was the Token of Truth-speaking : He that did it Deceitfully , was counted more Detestable then if he had Sworn . Which plainly implyes , that Swearing was Detested among them , as well as that they needed not to Swear , who so much used Truth-speaking . Quint. Curt. in vit . Alex. II. The Scythians , as it is reported by Q. Curtius , in their Conference with Alexander , upon Occasion of an expected Security , told him , Think not that the Scythians confirm their Friendship by Oath ; They Swear by keeping their Word . Which is not only a Proof of their Disuse of Common Oaths , but Swearing at all , even in Matters of greatest Importance . Plutarch Rom. Quest . 28. III. So Religious was Hercules , saith Plutarch , that he never swore but once . If it was Religiously done to swear but once in a Man's Life , it had been more Religiously done not to swear at all . How just and severe a Censure is this out of an Heathen's Mouth upon the Practice of Dissolute Christians ? Hesiod Theogon . p. 88. IV. Hesiod in his Theogonia places an Oath amongst the Brood of Contention ; An Oath , saith he , greatly hurts men . Again presently , An Oath goes with corrupt Judgments ; or an Oath flyes away together with cotrupt Judgments , that is , when Justice appears among men , Oaths vanish , as his Scope in that place shews . Seciad . in Stob. 28. V. It was one part of the Doctrine of the Seven Sages , so famous in Greece , That men ought not to Swear . Stob. Serm. 3. VI. Solon , the famous Law-giver of Athens , and one of those Seven Sages , exhorted the People to observe Honesty more strictly then an Oath . As if he had said , Honesty is to be preferred before Swearing , as another Saying of his imports , A good Man should have that Repute , as not to need an Oath ; it is a Diminution to his Credit to be put to Swear , Bp. Gaud. of Oaths , p. 41. Theognis ver . 660. VII . Theognis , the Greek Poet , writing of a Person Swearing , saith , Neither ought he to swear this or any thing : This Thing or Swearing ( it self ) shall not be . What is this less then , Swear not at all ? Valer. Max. lib. 8. cap. 18. Laert. Hermip . & Orig. contr . Cels . VIII . Pythagoras , a Grave and Virtuous Person , being earnestly intreated of the Crotonian-Senators for his Advice in things relating to the Government , did in his ●ra●ion , among other Excellent Sentences , with more then ordinary Emphasis , lay this down in the Nature of a Maxim , Let no man attest God by an Oath , though in Courts of Judicature ; but use to speak such things , as that he may be credited without an Oath . H. Grot. on Mat. 5.34 . IX . Clineas , a Just Greek , and Follower of Pythagoras , out of Love to Truth , and Respect he bore his Master's Doctrine , that injoyned him to fear and shun an Oath , chose to pay Three Talents , which amount to about Three Hundred Pound , rather then he would take any Oath : Whose Example Basilius Magnus upbraided the Christians of his Time with , that were then learning to Swear . Hierocles Comment in Carm. Pythag. p. 28. X. Hierocles testifies , That Pythagoras , in enjoyning them to revere an Oath , not only prohibits Forswearing , but requires them also to abstain from Swearing . And Aeshilus makes a sincere Beckon to a Matter a firm Oath . Stobaus Serm. 114. XI . Socrates , that worthy Gentile , and great Promoter of Virtue among the Athenians , among many Excellent Sentences delivered this , That Good Men must let the World see , how that their Manners or Dealings are more firm then an Oath . Which both proves that he saw a more Excellent Righteousness then Swearing Truth it self , and believed it attainable ; for he manifestly exhorts Good Men to that Integrity , which is a greater Caution then an Oath . He was put to Death for testifying against the Heathen Idols , acknowledging one only God. Plut. in Lacon . Epoph . XII . Lysander , the great Spartan Captain ; thought an Oath of so little Value in comparison of Truth , that he bestowed this contemptuous Saying upon Swearing , Children are to be deceived with T●yes , and Men with Oaths . Implying , that Sincerity is a greater Security then an Oath . Isocr . ad Demon. XIII . Isocrates , a Greek Orator , in his Oration to Demonicum , advises , Not to take an Oath for Money Matters . Also he teaches , That Good Men should shew themselves more credible then an Oath . Plat. de Leg. 12. XIV . Plato ( call'd Divine ) forbids Swearing in solemn Cases , That none swear himself ; That none require an Oath of another . He speaks there , how Rhadamanthus brought in Swearing by the Gods ; but that his Art therein was not agreeable to that Time ( it seems he accounted it an Art of Policy ) But that in all Actions or Causes , Laws which are made with Understanding , should take away Swearing from both Adversaries . For ( saith he ) it is an Horrible Thing , that when many Judgments are done in a City , well near half the People are forsworn in them — Therefore let the Presidents of Judgments not permit any to swear in Actions , not even for Perswasions sake ; but that he persevere in that which is Just , with a fitting Speech , &c. Valer. Max. 10. Cic. pro Corn. Balb. Diog. Laert. in vit . Xenocr . XV. Xenocrates was so renowned at Athens , for his Virtuous Life and great Integrity , that being called to give his Evidence by Oath , all the Judges stood up and forbad the Tender , because they would not have it thought , that Truth depended more upon an Oath , then the Word of an Honest Man. Menander . XVI . Menander , the Greek Poet , saith , Flee an Oath , though thou shouldst swear justly . Cherillus in Perseid . XVII . Cherillus saith , Oaths bring not Credit to the Man , but the Man must bring Credit to the Oaths . What serve they for then ? to Deceive ? It seems by this , that Credit is better then an Oath ; for it is the Credit that is the Security , not the Oath . Stobaeus in Jur. c. 27. XVIII . Alexides in Olynth , saith , A Wise Man ought alwayes to give Credit , not to Swearers , but to the Things themselves . Then Oaths are vain ; for it is not the meer Oath , but the Likelihood of the Truth of the Evidence , from the Consideration and Comparing of the Circumstances , that turns the Scale . Simocat . Epist . 33. F. XIX . Simocatus , Perfidiousness appears securer then Faithfulness ; and an Oath imposed is a fit Engin for Deceit . Strange ! that faithful Yea and Nay is stopt , when Perfidiousness with an Oath can pass all Guards , Courts and Offices . He manifestly links Oaths and Perfidiousness , and gives the Praise to Faithfulness . H. Gr●t . on Mat. 5. XX. Epictetus , a famous and grave Stoick , counselled , to Refuse an Oath ALTOGETHER . Quint. l. 8. XXI . Quintilian saith , that in Time past it was a kind of Infamy for Grave and Approved Men to Swear , as if their Authority should suffice for Credit : Therefore the Priests or Flamins were not compelled to it ; for then to compel a Noble Man to Swear , were like putting him upon the Rack , &c. Which shows an Oath to be an Unnatural and Extorting Way of Evidence , and that they preferred V●rtue and Truth before an Oath . Plutarch Rom. quest . 44. XXII . Plutarch in his 44th Rom. qu. upon the Custom of the Romans , holding it Unlawful for the Flamen Dialis , or Chief Priest , to Swear , puts the Question , Why is it not Lawful for Jupiter ' s Priest to Swear ? Is it because an Oath ministred unto Freemen is as it were the Rack & Torture tendered unto them ? For , certain it is , that the Soul , as well as the Body of the Priest ought to continue free , and not be forced by any Torture whatsoever ; or for that it is not meet to Distrust or Discredit him in small Matters , who is believed in Great and Divine Things ? or rather because every Oath endeth with Detestation and Malediction of Perjury ? And considering that all Maledictions be odious and abominable , therefore it is not thought good , that any other Priests whatsoever should Curse , or pronounce any Malediction : And in this respect was the Priestess of Minerva in Athens highly commended , for that she would never curse Alcibiades , notwithstanding the People commanded her so to do ; For I am ( quoth she ) ordained a Priestess to pray for Men , and not to curse them . Or last of all , was it , because the Peril of Perjury would reach in common to the whole Common-wealth , if a Wicked , Godless and Forsworn Person should have the Charge and Superintendence of the Prayers , Vows and Sacrifices made in the behalf of the City ? Thus far Plutarch , whose Morals have the Praise among all the Writings of Philosophers ; who is also commended himself very highly for his Virtue and Wisdom . See his Life . M. Aur. Ant. in Descript . bon . Vir. XXIII . M. Aurelius Antoninus , that Philosophical Roman Emperor , in his Description of a Good Man , sayes , That the Integrity of a truly good man is such , that there is no need of an Oath for him . Certainly then he was far from imposing Oaths upon his People , who both by his Exam-and Precept prefrr'd Integrity before an Oath . Libanius . XXIV . Libanius , a Greek Orator , though otherwise no Admirer of Christians , reckons this amongst the Praises of a Christian Emperor ; He is ( sayes he ) so far from being blackt with Perjury , that he is even afraid to swear the Truth . It seems then , they swore not in his time ; and that Libanius , an Enemy to Christians , preferr'd and admired Swear not at all . Auson . Epist . 2. XXV . We shall conclude with Ausonius , whose Saying seems to be all contracted , or those other Testimonies digested into one Axiom , that is , To swear or speak falsly , is one and the same thing . These are the Reflections upon Oaths we receive from Heathens , who by the Light they had , both discerned the Scope of the Evangelical Doctrine , Swear not at all , preceptively laid down by Christ our Lord , Mat. 5.34 . and prest it earnestly : And which is more to their Honour , but to the Christians Shame , several of them lived it sincerely . II. Testimonies from the Jews in Dislike of all Swearing . H. Grot. Com. on Mat. 5.34 . XXVI . Maimonides , out of the most ancient of the Jewish Rabbies extracts this memorable Axiom , IT IS BEST FOR A MAN NOT TO SWEAR AT ALL. Raimund . p. 135. XXVII . Raimundus quotes him thus , Maimonides in tract . de juramentis ; IT IS A GREAT GOOD FOR A MAN NOT TO SWEAR AT ALL ; The ancient and lawful Doctrine of the Synagogue . Jofeph . de bello Judaico l. 2. c. 7. XXVIII . The Esseni or Essaeans ( saith Josephus ) keep their Promise , and account every Word they speak of more force then if they had bound it with an Oath ; and they shun Oaths worse then Perjury ; for they esteem him condemned for a Lyar , who is not believed without calling God to witness . These Essaeans were the most Religious of the Jewish Pepole , though the Pharisees made the greatest Noise amongst the Rabble . Philo de decalogo , p. 583. XXIX . Philo , that excellent Jew , relates thus much concerning the same Essaeans , That what soever they said , was firmer then an Oath ; And that to Swear was counted amongst them a thing superfluous . Philo Judeus on Com. 3d. XXX . The same Philo himself thus taught in his Treatise on the Ten Commandments ; Commandment 3 d. Thou shalt not take the Name of God in vain : Many Wayes ( saith he ) do men sin against this Commandment ; so THAT IT IS BETTER NOT TO SWEAR AT ALL ; but so well accustom thy self to speak Truth alwaies , that thy Bare Word shall have the Force and Virtue of an Oath . It is become a Proverb , That to swear well and holily is a second Voyage ; for he that sweareth is suspected of Lying and Perjury . It is , saith he , most profitable and agreeable to the reasonable Nature , to abstain ALTOGETHER from Swearing . Whatsoever a godly Man speaks , let it go for an Oath . The Wisdom and Moderation of this worthy Personage reflects just Blame upon those that Pillage their Neighbours , because they Conscientiously Refuse an Oath : But that men , who pretend to be the Disciples of Jesus Christ , should commit these Cruelties , aggravates their Evils , and doubt less their Guilt . How can they ever hope to look their Lord with Comfort in the Face , who so severely Treat their Fellow-Servants ? Certainly Jews and Heathens will one Day rise up in Judgment against such Christians , for their Unnatural Carriage towards their Brethren : This is not to Love Enemies , but injure Friends . Jews and Heathens are become Names of Reproach ; yet to the Rebuke of Christians , as they call themselves , they not only discern'd the Rise and Ground of Oaths , but the Evil of using them , even while they were tolerated ; and both avoided them , and exhorted others to that Integrity which had no need of them . These Testimonies , though they are of Weight with us , and we hope they will have a due Impress upon the Minds of many of our Readers ; yet because nothing produced out of Jews and Gentiles , may advance our Cause with some , or render it ever the more acceptable , We shall next betake our selves to the more Christian Ages of the World , for Approbation of our Judgment , who we are sure will kindly entertain us , their Liberality being Extraordinary to our Cause ; and from whom we shall never want Votes for SWEAR NOT AT ALL , while their Works are in the World : May our Superiors joyn theirs with them , and we have Reason to believe , that our Deliverance from the Yoak of Oaths will be the happy Issue of this necessary Address . III. Testimonies from Christians , both Fathers , Doctors and Martyrs , in Dislike of All Swearing . Polycarpus . XXXI . The first Testimony recorded against Swearing , after the Apostles Times , was that of Polycarpus , who had lived with the Apostles , and was said to have been Disciple to John , not the least of the Apostles ; for at his Death , when the Governour bid him Swear , Defie Christ , &c. he said , Fourscore and Six Years have I served him , yet hath he never offended me in any thing . The Proconsul still urged and said , Swear by the Fortune of Caesar ; to whom Polycarpus answered , If thou requirest this Vain-glory , that I Protest the Fortune of Caesar , as thou sayest , feigning thou knowest not who I am , hear freely , I AM A CHRISTIAN . This Good man began his Fourscore and Six Years , which was about Twenty Years after James wrote Above all things , my Brethren , Swear Not ; and several years before John the Apostle deceased ; for he is called his Disciple . See his History and Commendation in Eusebius . We know it is objected by some , That he refused to Swear only because he could not swear by that Oath , which is a Guess , and no Confutation of what we alledge : But if that had been Polycarpus's Reason , why did he not rather say , The Law of God forbids Swearing by Idols ? 'T is certain , the first Christians would not Swear , but thought Polycarpus's Answer Security enough to them that demanded their Oath : He refused all Oaths as a Christian ; therefore saying , he was a Christian , was Reason sufficient why he would not take that Oath . Justin Martyr , Apol. 2. pro Christianis , ad Anton. Pium oper . p. 63. XXXII . It was some time before his Suffering that Justin Martyr , who is the first we find writing of it , publisht an Apology for the Christians in the year 150. as himself saith , and a second after that , wherein he tells us , after the Doctrine of his Master , That we should NOT SWEAR AT ALL , but alwayes speak the Truth . He , that is , Christ , hath thus commanded , SWEAR NOT AT ALL ; but let your YEA be YEA , and your NAY , NAY ; and what is more then these is of Evil. See his Praise and Martyrdom in Eusebius , soon after Polycarpus . Euseb . Eccl. Hist . lib. 5. c. 1. XXXIII . Under the same Emperor ( says Eusebius ) suffered also Ponticus , of Fifteen Years of Age , and Blandina , a Virgin , with all kind of Bitter Torments ; the Tormentors now and then urging them to Swear , which they constantly Refused . Euseb . ibid. lib. 6. cap. 4. XXXIV . And in the next Emperor's Reign , Basilides , a Souldier of Authority amongst the Hoast , being appointed to lead Potamiena to Execution , and by her convinced of the Truth in Christ , was after a while required to Swear ; But he affirmed plainly , It was not lawful for him to Swear ; for ( said he ) I am a Christian . He did not lay the Unlawfulness upon that Oath , but upon Swearing at all . The History only sayes , His Companions would have him swear upon some occasion or other , not mentioning by what ; His Answer was , It is Unlawful for me to Swear ; and why ? because , saith he , I am a Christian : The Consequence is plain , Christians took no Oaths , therefore not their Oaths . Tert. Apol. pro Christianis advers . gent. cap. 32. XXXV . In the same Emperor's Reign lived Tertullian , a strict and learned Man , who wrote a very notable Apology for the Christians , wherein he answers the Objection of the Heathen , who accused them of not being Well-wishers to the Emperor , nor Caesar's Friends , in that they refused to Sacrifice and Swear by the Genius , Fortune and Health of the Emperor ( we begin with this because it is urged by some against us ) saith he , We do Swear , as not by the Genius of the Caesars , so by or for their Safety , which is more August then all Genius's or Petty Gods ; for we reverently look up unto the Judgment of God in the Emperors , who hath set them over the Nations ; and we know that to be in them which God wills , and what God wills , that we will to be safe ( that God save it ) Hoc salvum esse volumus , et pro magno id juramento habemus ; i. And that we account for a great Oath , or that we have instead of a great Oath ; namely , our Well-wishing to Caesar : the thing that was desired , the Substance of the Oath ; that Oath which the Pythagoreans said was in all reasonable Creatures , viz. a full Resolution of Mind not to transgress the Law of God , which Tertullian saith here they had Respect to ; That Oath which a Just Man sweareth by his Deeds , as Clemens Alexandrinus speaketh . In like manner Tertullian sayes , to Scapula , We do Sacrifice for the Health of the Emperor , but that Way that God pleases , by pure Prayer ; so sayes he , Here we do swear by the Health of the Emperor , by willing his Health ; and I do work for the Health of the Emperor ; for I commend him to God * Otherwise , if we take the Words of this Doctor strictly and properly , who in writing is difficult , as Scultetus notes ; and obscure , as Lactantius sayes , we shall both cross the Scope of the Place , and accuse him and the Primitive Christians and Martyrs of his time , not only of Swearing , but Sacrificing for the Health of the Emperor ; neither of which do we ever read they did , nor as much as offered to do , had they , doubtless we should have heard off me Release or Favour shown them on that Condescension : Besides we shall also make him to contradict himself ( which Scultetus accuses him not of , in this ) For in his Book de Idololatria , he speaks without any Obscurity ; saying , I speak not of Perjury , seeing it is not Lawful to Swear . And in Chap. 23. he proves , That he which signs a Bill of Security containing and confirmed by an Oath , is guilty of Swearing , as if he had spoaken it , and transgresses Christ's Command , who hath prescribed not to swear . He is before speaking of the Idolatry , Christians are obnoxious to in regard of Imployments , as School-Masters by reason of Heathenish Books and Customs ; and Merchants or Trassiquers of Covetousness and Lying ; not to speak of Forswearing , saith he , SEEING IT IS NOT LAWFUL SO MUCH AS TO SWEAR ; which if any should do , he should surely be the Servant of Covetousness , in undertaking an unlawful Practice for Gain , as he sayes Lying was ; but if they should also Forswear , so adding Swearing to Lying , that should be a Servant of Servants to Covetousness , that is Idolatry : Which if Christians had committed indeed , it is unlikely that Tertullian would have made such a sleight and short preterition with a Sentence of Eight Words . And further observe , that both Tertullian and the Martyrs make use of the most Universal Proof , to make their Testimony for God full and compleat . And though their Enemies Tryal of them were short of proving them Christians , and distinguishing them from Jews ; yet in the Wisdom of God , their Answer and Argument being General and Christian , including the Special and Jewish , proves them not only true Jews , who were forbidden by God to Forswear , or to Swear by Idols ; but true Christians , not to swear , because it was unlawful ; for Christ had forbidden it : And as his Argument in the Apology aforesaid , was , It is Unlawful to Swear , much more to Forswear ; so here , Christ ( saith he ) hath prescribed not to Swear , then sure not to Swear and subscribe Gentile Oaths . So Basilides , Because I am a Christian , it is not lawful for me to swear ; then not your Oath : this is the just Sense and Consequence of it . And said Polycarp , I would have thee to know , that I am a Christian , and the Doctrine thereof , if thou wilt appoint a Time , I shall teach thee ( that is , not to swear ) therefore it is in vain for thee to bid me swear , and defie Christ : So Blandina and Ponticus were urged to Swear ( by what it is not said , and it matters not ) but in vain ; for they were Christians : We do not read that any used the Jewish Argument , the old Commandment , Thou shalt not Swear by Idols ; but the Christian Argument , the new Commandment , It is not lawful to Swear , Christ forbad it , I am a Christian , &c. And to this Purpose speaks Le Prieur on this Place of Tertullian , in his Annotations ( which the Publishers desired because of his Obscurity ; see their Preface ) Although , sayes he , the Christians did believe that All Swearing was Forbidden them , they before all Oaths were aware of Swearing by the Genius , or Fortune of the Prince . Here he confesses they were aware of All Swearing , much more that which was never lawful , to wit , Swearing by Idols . And thereupon he brings the Example of Polycarpus : But if all Oaths , then of Swearing by the Health of the Emperor ; for that was an Oath . And this African Writer's intricate Sense ( as the Publisher's Terms are ) must needs be in this as in the other , all along mystical : and as he sayes a little before , I offer a Sacrifice ( oratione ) by Prayer ; so going along he sayes , We Swear , juramus , i. jure oramus ; for so Bruno & Cassiodorus derive the Word , Jurare dictum est , quasi juste orare , hoc est , juste loqui . Again , Ps . 61. They swear in God , or to God , or by God , who Promise an inviolable Odience of Mind to him . Jurare to swear ( saith he ) is , jure orare , to speak Equity , that he will not decline to another Party , from what he hath promised . Again , Here Swearing is firmly in mind to resolve to fulfil the good Purpose . And that this must be Tertullian's Sense , not only the Scope ( for which see Scultetus on the Place ) but his Explanation of it , by willing what God wills , and that to be to them for a great Oath ; plainly declares to sagacious Readers , and such Tertullian's African Speech requires , as Rigaltius sayes of his Writings , which have been * altered of them that could not comprehend them . But is it likely that a Man so severe , that condemned the very subscribing of a Writing wherein an Oath was contained , and for this Reason , because Christ forbad to Swear at all ; and thought it needless to speak of Perjury , because it was not lawful to swear , should yet allow it in himself and others to swear even by that which was not God ? Besides , Suarez reckons him amongst those Fathers who were more especially against Swearing . Thus are the Conspirers against this part of the Doctrine of Christ , and his Apostles , Primitive Fathers and Martyrs , forc'd out of that Sanctuary they betook themselves to , in the Sentence of this intricate Doctor . Clem. Alex. Strom. l. 7. XXXVI . Clemens Alexandrinus , his Contemporary , famous for Learning and Strict Living , to help him in his Mystical Meaning of an Oath , sayes , He who is once a Believer , why shall he make himself an * Unbeliever , as that he hath also need to Swear , and doth not so lead his Life , that the same ( to wit , his Life ) be a firm and definite Oath , and shew the Faithfulness of Confession in a constant and stable Speech — Far be it , that he who is approved and discerned in such Piety , should be propense to Lye or to Swear — He who liveth justly , transgressing in nothing of these things that should be done , the same sweareth truly and holily by his Deeds and Works ( Mark how this agrees with Tertullian's improper Swearing ) the Testimony of the Tongue is superfluous to him — It sufficeth to add unto his Affirming or Denying this , viz. I SPEAK TRULY , that he beget Faith in them who perceive not the Stability of his Answer : For it behoveth him , as I judge ( saith he ) to have a Life worthy of Credit ( or Faith ) among those that are without , that an Oath be not sought from him — Neither doth he Swear , as being one , who hath determined to put for his Affirming YEA , for his Denying NAY . — Where is there any need of an Oath to him that so lives , as one that is attain'd to the height of Truth ? He therefore that doth not Swear , is far from Forswearing : He that transgresseth in nothing that is covenanted and agreed , HE MAY NEVER SWEAR . — Seeing he is fully perswaded that God is every where , and is ashamed not to speak Truth , and professeth that it is a thing unbeseeming , and unworthy for him to speak False ; he is content with this , that God and his own Conscience know it , and therefore he doth not Lye , nor do any thing besides or against what is covenanted and agreed : By that means he neither sweareth , if he be asked ; nor denyes , so as to speak false , though he dye upon the Rack for it . Likewise in his 5th , 7th and 8th Books of Strom. also in his 3d Book of his Paedagogue with Gentianus Hervetus's Notes on it , where he forbids to set Two Prices , and commands but one single one , and to speak Truth WITHOUT an Oath , &c. Origen in Matth. Tract . 25. XXXVII . Origen , his Successor , a Man of equal Fame for Learning and Piety , succeeds him also in this Testimony concerning Swearing : Because , saith he , the Jews have a Custom to swear by Heaven ; to the fore-going ( Prohibition ) Christ added this also to reprove them , because they more easily swore by Heaven then by God ; because he deals alike unreasonably , who sweareth by HEAVEN , as he that swears by the TEMPLE , or by the ALTAR , in that who sweareth by Heaven , seemeth to swear by him that sitteth in that Throne , and doth not escape Danger , as he thinks , because he sweareth not by God himself , but by the Throne of God : And these things he speaks to the Jews , forbidding them to give heed to the Traditions of the Pharisees ; otherwise , before , HE MANIFESTLY FORBAD TO SWEAR AT ALL. The Chief Priest said unto him , I adjure thee by the Living God , that thou tell us if thou be the Christ , the Son of God. In the Law we find the Use of Adjuring ; The Priest shall adjure the Woman with the Adjurations of this Curse . Also Ahab said unto Michaeas , I adjure thee that thou tell me the Truth in the Name of the Lord. The King adjured the Prophet , not by Command of the Law , but by his own Will. And now the Priest adjures Jesus by the Living God. But I account that a Man that will live according to the Gospel , MUST NOT ADJURE ANOTHER : For it is even like that which the Lord himself forbids in the Gospel , BUT I SAY UNTO YOU , SWEAR NOT AT ALL. For if it be not lawful to swear , as to the Gospel-Command of Christ , it is also true , that it is not lawful to Adjure another , or compel him to Swear . Huetius upon him addeth , that Athanasius , Chrysostom , Epiphanius , Hilary , and many more were of of the same Mind with him : and if so , we may without Offence add , upon that Respect our Superiors seem to carry to their Names , that it must needs be very remote from the Doctrine of the ancient Church , to fine , imprison , and bitterly treat those that for Conscience of that Gospel-Command do scruple an Oath in this Age. If thou wilt return , O Israel , saith the Lord , and put away thy Abominations , then shalt thou not remove . And thou shalt swear the Lord liveth in Truth , and Judgment , and Righteousness . Origen here tells us , That this is a Reproof of them that did not Swear in Judgment , but without Judgment : Howbeit , we know ( saith he ) that the Lord said unto his Disciples , But I say unto you , SWEAR NOT AT ALL. Perhaps formerly it behoved them to Swear in Truth , Judgment and Righteousness ; that after any had given Proof of his Integrity , he might be thought worthy of being believed WITHOUT ANY OATH AT ALL. But once having YEA , he needs no Witness that it is YEA ; and having NAY , he needs no other Evidence to prove that it is NAY . Thus doth Origen prefer and extol Evangelical Verity , wrapt up in solemn Yea or Nay , above the Swearing that was in Truth , Judgment and Righteousness under the Dispensation of the Law. Socrates Scolast . lib. 4. cap. 22. of his Ecclesiastical History . XXXVIII . Gregory Thaumaturgus , so called from his working of Miracles , on Eccles . lib. 46. cap. 8. saith , It is meet to give diligent heed to the Words of the King , and to flee an Oath by all means , especially that which is taken in the Name of God. See his great Praise , his Works and Miracles . Cyprian Lib. 3. Testim . ad Quirin . XXXIX . Cyprian , a famous Father , and faithful Martyr ( who lived about the middle of the Age , in the beginning of which Origen flourished ) in his third Book of Testimonies to Quirinus , Who hath desired me ( said Cyprian ) to draw out of the holy Scriptures certain Heads , belonging to the Religious Discipline of our Sect ( for so he calleth his own , the Christian Religion ) His 12th Head amongst them is , Not to Swear . Again , Writing of Pastors and Teachers , he biddeth them , Remember what the Lord taught , and said , Let your saying be Yea , Yea ; and Nay , Nay . In another Place he saith , It is unlawful for any man to compel another to take an Oath . Hitherto the Christians , being under most cruel Sufferings , generally kept faithful to the Command of Christ in this Point ; and so we find very little in their Writings about it , besides a simple and bare asserting of it as the Doctrine of Christ , not to swear at all , as well as it was of Moses , not to swear falsly or vainly ; for more was no way needful , in that it was not Contested , but universally so Received . But after that Christian-Emperors had engaged themselves in Parties , then it seems many out of Flattery , and to engage them to their Sect , took Liberty to Swear , even by the Health of the Emperor , as is objected against us by some out of Eusebius ; but such he did not account Religious ; neither that a Religious Part so to do , much less an August Act ; and least of all , a most August Act of Divine Worship , as some would have it ; seeing Stobaeus observes from him , That whereas many exhorted that they be honest and faithful in an Oath , he , for his part , esteemed it not the Part of a Religious Man , not to avoid even Swearing it self . And we believe it will be a hard Matter to find any in the Greek Church , especially for the first Three Hundred Years , that would allow Swearing so large a Place in Sacred Things , yea , or in later Ages either , even in the Latin Church ; nay , of those who have allowed it in some Cases , many or most of them have denyed it any Place at all in the Worship of God , as of it self , accounting it an Abatement , rather then an Advancement to Christianity , which no part of the true Worship of God can be . But some perhaps taking of Tertullian's word Augustior , or more August , ( which he sayes , the Safety of the Emperor is , in Comparison of all the Genius's ) to be the highest Act of God's Worship , they would have us swear by that , after the Example of those mention'd in some Christian-Emperors Times . Tertullian's Sense we shall easily grant ; for it is so , and we do so , in that we commend our Prince and Governours to God , to God only , with earnest and sincere Desires for his and their Safety , above all such Genius's , as Tertullian calls Daemonia . But we justly deny upon the score of what we have made appear to the contrary , even from Tertullian himself , and others , That he , or the Christians in his time , or for Two Hundred Years before , or a Hundred Years after , did swear , as some would have us , least of all as a most August Act of the Worship of God , without which all others are unacceptable ; or that those who did swear afterwards were the most Religious ; seeing Eusebius esteems otherwise , and not he only , but also those very Devout Men that we have already produced , besides many which might and may be mentioned : For , all that we have yet met with , in those Times , that speak of it , speak against it ; and of the following Times Men of greatest Renown and Authority , labour'd with all Earnestness to expel Oaths the Society of Christians , and cure them of that Distemper by inculcating the Doctrine of Integrity , that needs no Oath ; proving by holy Scripture , that it was the plain and absolute Law of Christ , that Christians ought not to swear at all ; and by other Arguments , that the Original of Oaths was neither from God , nor good Men : But they crept into Use through the Corruption of Times , and meer Carelesness of Governments ; for , when they could not trust one another , they called their God's to witness ; but God separating Abraham and his Posterity from among them , to himself , the better to draw them from Idols , commanded them to swear by him only : as much as if he would have said ; If you will Swear , let it be by my Name rather then Idols , that so you may , though it be after a mean manner acknowledge a real Deity , the Only Lord of all : But how long was this Condescension to last ? But till the Fulness of Time came ; That , with other Permissions , removed all Swearing , Christ bringing men to the Truth in the Inward Parts , as in the Beginning , before Swearing was in being ; for from the Beginning it was not so . But to shew what other Fathers Reasons & Testimonies against this Heathenish and Jewish Usage , indeed Bondage , were , at the coming in of the Apostacy , we shall begin with Athanasius , a Man that was in great Renown in the dayes of Constantine the Great , and whose Creed is the Faith and Test of Christendom at this day . Athanasius on the Passion of Christ . XL. The Evangelical Sentence of the Lord is , Let your Yea be Yea , and your Nay , Nay : Thus far we , who are in Christ , may confirm our Words with Asseverations , and with no further Progress let us flee to or approach Oaths , that we alledge not God for Witness for Corruptible Money 's sake , especially since Moses so sets down the Law ; Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord thy God in a vain thing . For if any one is plainly worthy to name God , he is also worthy of Belief ; For , whosoever is meet for greater things , he will be much more fit for less : On the contrary , if he be not worthy Belief , that he may be credited without an Oath , surely he is not one that is worthy to name God. If he be not faithful in Word , how will God by any means be the Witness of an Oath for him , who is destitute of Faith , to which God hath Respect ? Again , The Lord is nigh to all that call upon him in Truth ; by which alone the Lord can be called upon : Wherefore why do they swear by God , who are not trusted even in small Matters ? Otherwise , an Oath is a Testimony of Truth , and not a Judge of Businesses , sith men do swear , not that they may signifie Businesses , but that they may confirm the Truth ; and that they may shew , that those things which they produce , are without Lying : If therefore he that swears hath Faith and Truth , WHAT USE IS THERE OF AN OATH ? But if he hath no Faith nor Truth , why do we undertake such an Impiety , that for poor silly Men , and those mortal too , we call to Witness GOD , that is above men ? For if it be a base Part to call to witness an Earthly King to the lowest Judicatures , as one that is greater then both Actors and Judges ; why do we cite him that is uncreated to created things , and make God to be despised of men ? HOUT , that exceeds all Iniquity and Audaciousness : What then is to be done ? NO MORE but that our YEA be YEA , and our NAY be NAY ; and in short , THAT WE DO NOT LYE . But if we shall seem to speak Truth , and imitate the true God , some perchance may thus contradict . If an Oath be forbidden to men , and a man imitates God in not Swearing , how is it that God is related in the holy Scriptures to swear ? for , he swore to Abraham , as Moses witnesseth : And it is written in the Psalms , The Lord swore , and will not repent , &c. For these things seem to be repugnant to the former ; and that thereby there is permitted to men a Liberty of Swearing . But this is not so , nor can any think so : For God sweareth by none ; for how can he , seeing he is Lord and Maker of all things ? But if any thing , this must be said , that His Word is an Oath , inducing the Hearers by a sure Faithfulness , that what he promiseth & speaketh , shall certainly be effected ; sith God sweareth not as Man , but his Word to us is as an Oath for V●rity . And speaking to men , he is said to swear : And this also the Saints do utter after the manner of men ; that as they themselves speaking would have Credit to be given them , so likewise they themselves should give Credit to God : For , as a man's Word confirmeth an Oath , so also those things that God speaketh , because of the Firmness and Immutability of his Will are to be reputed Oaths . The same also that is there written confirmeth my Saying , For the Lord hath sworn , and will not repent ; as a thing not to be retracted by Repenting , but certainly to be effected , according to the Engagement of an Oath . This also God doth declare in Genesis , saying , I have sworn by myself : But that is not an Oath ; for he swore not by another , which is proper for an Oath , but by himself , which contains not the Estimation of an Oath . But this is done that the Sureness of his Promise may appear ; and how confidently that ought to be believed which is spoaken . That sweet Psalmist will witness for me in his Psalm , calling God to mind , when he saith , Where are thy ancie●t Mercies , O Lord , which thou swarest to David thy Servant , in ( or by ) thy Truth ? For God sweareth not by his Truth ; But because he , who is True , speaketh in his Word , That to men is for an Oath unto Belief . So God doth not swear after the manner of men : neither must we be induced thereby to take Oaths ; but let us so Say , and so Do , and so approve our selves in saying and doing , that we need not an Oath for the Hearer ; and that our Words of themselves may have the Testimony of Truth : For , by that Way we shall plainly imitate God. Hilary on Mat. 5.34 . XLI . Hilary , a Father , very Famous in the dayes of Constantius , Son to Constantine ( but an Arrian , and which was worse , a Persecutor , so that this Hilary was banished ) in his Commentary on those words in Matthew , Ye have heard that it was said to them of old , Thou shalt not Forswear thy self , &c. thus expresseth himself , The Law set a Penalty for Perjury , that the Conscience of Religion or Fear of an Oath might restrain the Deceitfulness of Minds ; for the rude and insolent People made frequent mention of their God by a familiar Course of Swearing : But Faith doth remove the Custom of an Oath , making the Businesses of our Life to be ●etermined in Truth , and laying aside the affecting to deceive ; prescribing the Simplicity of Speaking and Hearing , that what WAS , WAS : what WAS NOT , WAS NOT ; that the Business of Deceiving might be apparent between IT IS , and IT IS NOT ; and what is more , is all of Evil : For what is , it is its Property alwayes , that so it is ; and what is not , it is its Nature , that it is not : Therefore to them that live in the Simplicity of Faith , there is no NEED of the Religion ( or Superstition ) of an OATH ; with whom alwayes what is , IS ; what is not , IS NOT : And by these both all their Words and Deeds are in Truth . Neither by Heaven ] God not only suffers us not to make Oaths to God , because all the Truth of God is to be held in the simplicity of our Word and Deed ; but also condemneth the Superstition of old Disobedience , &c. Suarez de Juram . l. 1. c. 1 , 2. XLII . The next Testimony we shall pitch upon in Confirmation of our Reasons , and the Sense we take our Master's Precept in , Swear not at all , is afforded us out of the Apostolical Institutions asscribed to Clemens Romanus , reported by Suarez , in his Book de Juramentis , Our Master ( saith Clemens ) hath commanded , that we SHOULD NOT SWEAR , no , not by the True God ; but that our Word should be more credible then an Oath it self . Which is a plain Indication of the Apostolical Doctrine to have been the absolute Prohibition of Oaths , in that Sense wherein they were only reputed Lawful : for if men ought not to Swear , no , not by the true God ; then consequently by no other Oath , as his following words not only imply , but express , viz. That the Word of a Christian should be more credible then an Oath it self . Again , He that in the Law established to Swear well , and forbad False Swearing ; commanded also , NOT TO SWEAR AT ALL. Orthodoxagrapha p. 11. LXIII . There is a Tract , call'd , The Gospel of Nicodemus : We know it is reputed spurious , but that makes nothing against us ; that disputes the Author , and not the M●tter ; for though Nicodemus never wrote such a Book , certain it is that such a Book was written , which is in Favour of Christianity , as then received : In the Place cited Pilate is made to say , I adjure you by the Health of Caesar , that these things that you say , &c. They answer'd , We have a Law , not to SWEAR , because it is a Sin. Whoever wrote it , this Benefit cometh to our Argument , that the Christians , at that time , thought an Oath a Sin ; for it is not to be doubted , but he that gave that Answer ▪ knew it to be the Doctrine and Practice of Christians ; for he was therein to represent them . Basilius Magnus on Psalm 14. XLV . Basil , called the Great , another Champion of the like Fame , and in the same time of Valens , the Persecuting Arrian Emperor , by whom he suffered Imprisonment and Cruel Threatnings ( see their Praises in Socrates Scolasticus ) on the 14th Psalm , with us the 15th , He that sweareth , and deceiveth not his Neighbour ; so Basil hath it , and upon it these words : Here he seemeth to allow an Oath to a Perfect Man , which in the Gospel is ALTOGETHER forbidden ; But I say unto you , not to Swear at all . What shall we say then ? That every where the Lord , as well in the old as in the new Law , hath the same Consideration of Commanding ; for desiring to anticipate the Effects of Sins , and prevent them by Diligence , and to extinguish Iniquity at the first beginnings , As the old Law saith , Thou shalt not commit Adultery ; the Lord saith , Thou shalt not Lust : The old Law saith , Thou shalt not Kill ; the Lord ordaining Perfection , saith , Thou shalt not be Angry : So also in this place , the Prophet indeed seemeth to assent to an Oath ; but the Lord , to take away all Occasion of Perjury , and willing to prevent the Dangers of Swearers , takes away Swearing ALTOGETHER : For he names an Oath in many places the immutable and firm Constancy of any thing or purpose . I have sworn , and have stedfastly purposed to keep the Judgments of thy Righteousness : Also , The Lord hath sworn , and will not repent . Not that David brought the Lord for a Witness of his Sayings , and to get Belief to his Doubting , but that he confirmed the Grace of his Profession by an Immutable and firm Decree : so also he could have said here , that is , He that sweareth , and deceiveth not his Neighbour , that it may agree with the Saying of our Saviour , Let your Word be YEA , YEA ; NAY , NAY . To things that are , thou mayst affirm and assent ; but of things that are not , although all men urge thee , yet thou mayst never be drawn by any means to affirm against the Nature of the Truth : Is the thing not done , let there be a Denyal ; is it done , let it be affirmed by Word . And he that shall not assent to him so affirming , * let him look to it , and feel the Harm of his Unbelief . It is a base and a very foolish thing to accuse one's self , as one unworthy of being believed , and to betake and refer one's self to the Security of an Oath . Now , there are some Speeches which have the Forms of Oaths , and yet are no Oaths at all , but rather Remedies to perswade ; as Joseph to make the Aegyptian familiar with him , swore by the Health of Pharaoh ( 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 live Pharaoh ) And the Apostle , willing to shew his Love to the Corinthians , said , By the Glorying of you , which I have in Christ Jesus , our Lord : For he did not depart from the Doctrine of the Gospel who , by a thing before all most dear unto him , simply sought Belief to the Truth . He refused to swear at the Council of Chalcedon : And speaking of Clineas , a Pythagorean , who might have avoided a Mulct of Three Talents , if he would have sworn , which he rather suffered ; saith , In keeping these things he seems to have heard that Command concerning an Oath that is forbidden us . And he upbraided the Christians of his time with it , that would swear . This Basil the Great , in his 29th Canon to Amphilochius , writes thus , Because an Oath is ALTOGETHER FORBIDDEN , such an one as is taken to an Evil Purpose , is much more to be condemned — Again , If an Oath , simply as such , be prohibited , of greater Reason when it is to effect some Mischievous End — The Cure consisteth in a twofold Admonition ; 1. NOT TO SWEAR ; 2. TO SVPPRESS THE FORM OF OATHS . Blastaris Syntagma Tit. E. c. 32. XLV . There was an ancient Law made to this effect , It is FORBIDDEN to all , from the Bishop and Clergy-Men to the Readers , to TAKE ANY OATH AT ALL. Blastaris also brings in this Objection , But since those are punished who swear falsly , and those are passed by who swear well , some may say , Therefore it is permitted to swear . To which he answers , But where shall we dispose , o● how shall we dispense with the Evangelical Precept in the Gospel , THAT FORBIDS STAKING ANY OATH AT ALL ? Adding , But I believe that the Gospel endeavoured to root out that Wicked Stem ( as I may say ) which is in sinful me● , and FOR THAT CAVSE PROHIBITED AN OATH , which is as the Door or In-let to Perjury . Gregor . Nyssenus on Cant. orat . 13. XLVI . Gregory Nissenus , Brother to Basil , spoaken of by Socrates Scolasticus in the same place , and in lib. 5. cap. 9. His Works are Famous : And in his Explanation on the Canticles , bestows this Testimony upon us : He , who by Moses established the Beginnings of the Law , by himself fulfilled all the Law and the Prophets , as he saith in the Evangels : I came not to destroy the Law , but fulfil it ; who taking away Anger , abolisheth Killing also ; and together with Lust , took away Adultery . He also casts out of men's Lives accursed Perjuries , whilst by the Prohibition of an Oath , he has put in his Sith as it were to Security : For it cannot be , that any should not keep an Oath when there is no Oath ; Therefore saith he , You have heard , that it was said to them of old time , Thou shalt not Forswear , but shalt render to the Lord thy Oaths ; but I say unto you , SWEAR NOT AT ALL , neither by Heaven , &c. but let your YEA be YEA , and your NAY , NAY ; for whatsoever is more , is of the Devil . Thus do they mostly end ; which shows how they understood Christ's Words . Greg. Nazianz. in his Dialogue against Swearing , Jamb . 20. XLVII . Gregory Nazianzen , a great Man in the Church , also speaketh to the same Purpose , in his Dialogue against Swearing , saying , B. What Oath dost thou leave to us ? A. I wish I might leave none , and that there were never any more . But thou sayest , We have heard that God himself sometimes swore : The holy Scriptures record that ; But is there any thing better then God ? Surely nothing is found better then He : If therefore nothing be better then he , it should follow , that he never swears . B. Why therefore do they record that he swore ? A. When God saith any thing , that is the Oath of God. B. And how doth he swear by himself ? A. How ! He should not at all be God , if he should lye . B. Thou speakest strangely ! A. No Wonder ; that is the Nature of God peculiarly , that he cannot lye : There is none that can deny this . B. But what wilt thou say to me of the old Covenant ? Surely it doth not prohibit an Oath , but requires a true one ? A. No Wonder : At that time only it was prescribed in the Law concerning Murder ; but now it is not lawful for any Cause so much as to smite or beat : then the End of an Evil Deed only came into Judgment ; but now that also which moveth to the End. This is my Judgment : for now we have made , a long Progress ; wherefore a Wise Man will abstain from Oaths . B. What then ? Dost thou give to some as Infants a kind of first Food , that they may at length receive a succeeding kind of Meat ? A. Thou judgest right and wisely . B. But Paul also swore , as they say ? A. Who said so ? Oh , what a vain Jangler was he that said it ! Quoth he , God is my Witness , and God knoweth : Those words are not an Oath , but a certain Asseveration in such great things , constant and inviolable . B. Wilt thou allow the same also to me ? A. I wish , that to thy Power thou wouldst plainly become a Paul , and so thou wouldst have a Right Rule of thine Actions . B. What if I use an Oath Unwillingly , but to free me from Danger ? A. Let another allow thee that . B. What if an Oath be written , and not pronounced with the Voice ? A. And what 's the Meaning of a Writing ? Surely amongst all other Obligations , a Writing doth more bind and obliege us . B. What if we be drawn by Necessity to give an Oath ? A. Why didst thou not rather Dye ? For surely , thou shouldst rather Dye then do that . B. What if the Books of the holy Scriptures be not used ? A. What! Is Religion placed in a Leaf ? Is God absent by this Means ? It is evident that thou fearest ( Paper , or ) Parchment , and I fear God more : This is a frequent Disease to many , and usual ; neither is it otherwise then if a Man beat the Master , and Disgrace him , and make his Servant a Free-man , and do him Honour ( What a notable Reproach should that be ? ) or as if a Man should preserve the King's Image , and in the mean time destroy the King. B. It is even as thou sayest : But I would have thee say what is more to be shewn . A. Many use to say , I swore with my Tongue , but my Mind is free from Swearing . Any thing may be more cunningly excused then an Oath : Let him not suffer any Colour to be made for himself ; For this is an Oath : And how much Mischief , tell me , comes from Deceit it self ? Let us see what an Oath is : Nothing else but the very Meaning ( or Mind ) of those things which we set down — Thou wouldst have me add what remains : Surely an Oath is nothing else , but a certain Consummation as it were of Mischiefs : O Dangerous Flame ! B. But Plato doth some such thing . He is Religiously aware , that he swear not by any God. A. Truly I know what thou art about to say : There was a certain Plane Tree , by which alone he made Oath : But he did not swear rightly , neither by that ; For he had an Understanding in something ; but what a just & religious Oath should be , that he could not understand . And what was this , tell me now ? A certain Shadow of an Oath ; a Declaration without a Name ; an Oath no ▪ Oath , as the Philosophers swore by a strange and unknown God. Lastly , it is nothing else , but to make Oath by any thing . Here our Speech let be an End. Thou threatnest that thou wilt leave me athirst sooner then I would . A. If an Oath seem a small thing to thee , truly I cannot commend thee : But if it is , as it is , in the number of horrible things , I will also dare to produce a mighty thing : I do adjure by a very Oath it self , that thou abstain from , and beware of Oaths , and thou hast the Victory . B. I wish I had . What Fruit gets he that often sweareth ? Laughter . What more ? That when he speaks Truth , he shall not be believed . In another place he saith , That to swear by Creatures is to swear with regard to God himself ; so Christ himself saith , Mat. 5.35 . and chap. 23.16 , 23. Caesarius , Num. 43. XLVIII . Caesarius , Brother to Gregory Nazianzen ; in his spiritual Sentences , hath this Sentence , Flee ALL Swearing , or EVERY Oath : How then shall we get Belief ? As well by Speech as by virtuous Actions and Carriages , that gain Belief to our Speech . Perjury is a Denying of God : What need of God in this Matter ? Interpose and put in ure thy Actions . Epiphan . adv . Heres . lib. 1. ord . 19. §. 6. XLIX . Epiphanius , whom S●crates Scholasticus , lib. 6. cap. 9. calls a Man of great Fame and Renown , and a Virtuous and Godly Person ; in his first Book against Heresies ●not accounting Denying to Swear an Heresie , but rather the contrary , as may appear by his words , which are these ) In the Law , as well as the Gospel , it is commanded not to use another Name in Swearing : but in the Gospel he commanded not to Swear , neither by Heaven nor Earth , nor other Oath ; but let Yea Yea ; Nay , Nay ; BE AS AN OATH as Petavius translates it ) for what is more then these is of Evil. Therefore I suppose that the Lord ordained concerning this , because of some mens Allegations , that would swear by other Names ; and first , that we must not Swear , no , not by the Lord himself , nor by any other Oath ; for it is an Evil thing to swear at all . Therefore he is Evil that compels not only to swear by God , but by other things , &c. Ambros . de Virgin. lib. 3. L. Ambrose , soon after , being a Lay man or Citizen of Milan , was by the People , against his Will , chosen Bishop of that City , for his great Worth and Godliness , whose Writings are of great Account ; And speaking of the Inconveniency occasion'd by an Oath , saith , Wherefore not without Cause doth the Lord in the Gospel command not to Swear , that there may be no Cause of Forswearing , that there may be no Necessity of Offending . He that Sweareth not , certainly he never Forsweareth ; but he that Sweareth , sometimes he must needs fall into Perjury , because all Men are subject to Lye. Do not therefore Swear , lest thou beginnest to Forswear . Therefore the Lord , who came to teach the little Ones , to INSPIRE Novices , to confirm the * Perfect , saith in the Gospel , YE MUST NOT SWEAR AT ALL ; because he spoak to the Weak . Lastly , He spoak not only to the Apostles , but to the Multitude ; for he would not have thee to Swear , lest thou shouldst Forswear . And he added , Not to swear , neither by Heaven , nor by the Earth , &c. namely , by those things that are not subject to thy Power . The Lord Sware , and shall not Repent . He may swear , who cannot repent of his Oath : And what did the Lord swear ? That Christ is a Priest forever : Is that Uncertain ? Is that Impossible ? the Lord has sworn . Can it any way be changed ? Do not therefore use the Example of an Oath , because thou hast not Power to fulfil an Oath . Also , in his Commentary on the Hebrews , he saith , Because Mankind is incredulous , God condescendeth to us , if even he sweareth for us . So that he shews , that not to be an Argument for Swearing to be desired , seeing it is only in Condescension to a Defect ; not to be encouraged from it to swear , or to require it . Chrysost . on Gen. hom . 15. LI. Chrysostom , in those dayes very Famous in the Church , and therefore styl'd the Golden Doctor ; in his 15th Homily on Genesis , saith ; A Christian must flee Oaths by all means , hearing the Sentence of Christ , which saith , It was said to them of old , Thou shalt not Forswear ; But I say unto you , SWEAR NOT AT ALL. Let none say therefore , I swear in a Just Business . IT IS NOT LAWFUL TO SWEAR , NEITHER IN A JUST NOR UNJUST THING . To swear is of the Devil , seeing Christ faith , For what is more , is of Evil , or the Evil One. Swearing took not its Beginning from the Will , but from Negligence only . Thou hast heard ( saith he ) the Wisdom of Christ , saying , That not only to Forswear , but also in ANY MANNER TO SWEAR , is Devilish , and all a Device of the Evil One. IF TO SWEAR IS FOUND TO BE DEVILISH , how are they to be punished who Forswear ? IF TO SWEAR TRULY BE A CRIME , and a transgressing of the Commandment , where shall we place Perjury ? Speaking of a Christian ( so call'd ; for he that dare do such things we cannot call a sincere Christian ) whom he saw compelling a certain Honest , Ingenuous , Modest and Faithful Matron , to go into the Jews Synagogue , there to be Sworn about some Business in Controversie betwixt them , she desiring Help , and imploring to be freed from this Wicked Force , &c. I ( saith he ) kindled with Zeal , arose , and not suffering her to be further drawn into this Prevarication , rescued her ; and enquired of him that had drawn her to it , Whether he were a Christian or not ? Who confessing he was ; I severely urged and upbraided him with his Folly and Extream Madness , to go about to draw any Body , he professing himself to be a Worshipper of Christ , TO THE JEWS DENS , who had crucified him . And going on in speaking , I taught him out of the holy Gospel , THAT IT IS NOT LAWFUL TO SWEAR AT ALL , NOR TO INCITE ANY TO SWEAR , after that ; not one that is a Believer or initiated , no , nor one that is not initiated , to be drawn to that Extremity : After I had spoaken much , and a long time of it , I delivered his Mind from the Error of Opinion , &c. Be pleased to observe how Chrysostom , a Zealous and Famous Man , both for his Books , and the Persecution that he suffered , being Patriarch or Prime Oversees of the Church at Constantinople , one of the Four of the chiefest in the World , uses no Distinction of private and publick Oaths , the common Talk of our Imposers ; for here he labours against drawing any to Swear at all , even in Judicature , because it was not lawful TO SWEAR SO AT ALL , no , not as the Jews swore , much less as the Gentiles . Again , Let none say to me , What if any lay on me a Necessity of Swearing ? And what if he do not believe ? Certainly where the Law is violated one , must not make any mention of Necessity ; for there is one unavoidable Necessity , NOT TO OFFEND GOD. Moreover , this I say , That in the mean time we may cut off superfluous Oaths , those , I mean , which are made rashly and without any Necessity amongst Friends and Servants ; And if thou take away these , in the other thou shalt need me no more : For that Mouth which hath learned to fear and flee an Oath , if any would compel it ten thousand times , it will never admit of falling into that Custom , &c. But if thou fear nothing else , at least fear that Book which thou takest in thy hands , bidding another to Swear ; and when thou turnst it , and markst what Christ hath there commanded concerning Oaths , QUAKE & FORBEAR . What doth it say then of OATHS there ? Answ . But I say unto you , Swear not at all . Dost thou make that Law an Oath , which forbids to Swear ? Oh Injurious , Oh Unjust thing ! For thou dost , as if a man should take for his Companion a Law giver that forbids to kill , and command him to be made a Murderer . As therefore , when a Fight is begun , although we are often Reviled ; yet we endure it well , and we say to him that doth it , that Patron of thine hath hurt me , he holds my Hands ; and this serves us for Solace . After the same manner if thou wilt exact an Oath of any , restrain thy self , and with-hold ; and say to him that is about to swear , What shall I do to thee , sith God hath commanded , neither to swear , nor to compel to swear ; he now with-holdeth me ? This is enough for the Law-giver's Honour , for thy Security , and his Fear who should swear . Do thus much for me therefore , that they that come hither may say , That is not to be seen in any City , which is at Antioch ; For they that inhabit that City had rather their Tongues should be cut out , then an Oath should proceed out of their Mouth , &c. What is it ? Thou shalt render unto the Lord thy Oaths : that is , in swearing thou shalt speak true ; But I say unto you , NOT TO SWEAR AT ALL : And then , to put off the Hearers , that they should not swear by God , he saith , Neither by Heaven , for it is the Throne of God ; nor by the Earth , for it is his Foot-stool , &c. For he said not , because the Heaven is Fair and Great , nor because the Earth is Vile ; but because that is the Throne of God , and this his Foot-stool ; by all which he drives them to the Fear of God. — What then , if any require an Oath , and impose a Necessity of Swearing ? A. Let the Fear of the Lord be more forcible to thee then all Necessity or Compulsion : For if thou wilt alwayes object such like Occasions , thou wilt keep none of those things which are commanded : For thou mightst also say it concerning thy Wife ; What if she be a Scold ? What if she be Nice and Curious ? And of thy Right Eye ; What if I have a Delight in it , and be inflamed with the Love of it , & c. ? and so thou wilt trample upon all things that are commanded . But in the Laws which Men command thou darest alledge no such thing , as , What if this or that , & c ? And if thou wilt keep the Law of Christ , thou wilt not suffer any Compulsion to hinder thee from the Observation thereof ▪ for he that heard the Blessedness that is before , in the same Sermon , and shews himself such an one as Christ commendeth , he shall suffer no such Compulsion from any , seeing he is Venerable and Admirable with all Men. What then shall we say is beyond Yea and Nay ? A. Without doubt AN OATH , not Perjury ; sith this is altogether manifest , and none needs be taught that it is of Evil ; and not so much Superfluous , as Altogether Contrary . Now , that is superfluous which is added needlesly , and too much ; which surely is an Oath . Why then shall this be said to be of Evil ? And if it was of Evil , how was it commanded in the Law ? A. Thou wilt say that also concerning thy Wife ; How is it now Adultery , which was sometime suffered ? What then shall we say to these things ? But that many of those things which were then spoaken , the Weakness of them that received the Law required : For it is a thing very unmeet for God to be worshipped with the Smell of Sacrifices , even as it is not congruent for a Philosopher to stutter and bable ; Therefore such a Divorce is now called Adultery ; and an Oath now comes of Evil , when the Increasings of Virtues are come to their Perfection . But if these things had been the Laws of the Devil from the beginning , they had never come to such Proficiency ; for unless those things had gone before , those other had never been so easily received . Do not therefore desire the Virtue of those things , whose Use is now past : They were available indeed then when the time required , yea , if thou pleasest , now also : For now their Virtue is shewn in that same thing also , wherein we most accuse ; for that they now appear such , is their great Praise : For , unless they had nurs'd us up well and profitably , and had made us fit for the receiving of greater things , they would not now seem to us to be such . For as the Nurse's Teat , when it hath done all its Office , and brought the Child to the measure of the stronger Age , seems to be unprofitable ; and the Parents , who formerly judged the Teat to be Necessary for their Child , do afterward pursue it with very many Scorns , and usually do not only make it Uncomely in Words , but also besmear it with certain bitter Juices of Herbs , that when they cannot bridle the eager unseasonable Desire of the Child about it , they may quench it at least with those things . So also Christ said , It was of Evil ; not that he might shew the old Law to be of the Devil , but that also he might recall them more vehemently from the old Vileness : And these things he said unto his Disciples ; but unto the stupid Jews , and them that persist in the same Impiety , as with a certain Bitterness , he so compast their City , they being captivated with Fear , as that he made it inaccessible : And because he could not hereby restrain them , but that they again desir'd to see it , as Children running back to the Teat , he took it quite away , destroying it , and scattering them , most of them , far away from it ; as men usually shut up Calves from their Dams , that they may gain them to be weaned from their accustomed Food of Milk. But if the old Testament were of the Devil , he would not have forbidden * Images to be worshipped ; and to the contrary , have brought in and commanded such a Worship as this ; for the Devil would have such a thing to be done . But now we see that the Law did on the contrary ; and for that Cause also the Way of Swearing was in times permitted , † lest men should Worship Images , and Swear by them , Swear , saith he , by the true God. So the Law brought not a mean Good to men ▪ but a very great one , if it sought to bring them to solid Meat . What Evil therefore hath Swearing ? Much Evil , without question ; But now at this time , after SO GREAT MANIFESTATIONS of Power ; not then by any means . Thou wilt say ; How can it be , that the same is sometimes Good , sometimes not ? I will also produce too against thee , How is it that the same thing is sometimes good , sometimes not good ▪ Doth not all that is in the World proclaim the same , as , Educations , Arts , Fruits and all other things ? Therefore first weigh that in our own Nature : For to be carryed in one's Arms , is a good Part in the first Age , afterwards a very pittiful thing . To use Chew'd Meats in the beginning of one's Life is good , afterwards very full of Indecency and Loathsomness : To be fed with Milk & to flee to the Nourishment of the Teats , at the first is profitable and wholsome , but afterwards hurtful & noisom . Thou seest how the same things are sometimes good , according to the times , and sometimes appear to be of another Nature : For it is a comely thing for a Child to wear a Child's Vesture , but shameful for a Man. Wouldst thou also learn on the contrary , how those things are not fit for a Child , which are not for a Man ? Give a Man's Vesture to a Child , and great Laughter will follow thereupon , and greater Danger in Going , making him to reel this way and that way : Commit unto him the Care of Civil Businesses and Affairs , either to Traffique , or Sow or Reap , and again it will be very ridiculous . But what do I speak of these ? Even Man-slaughter it sel● , which Christ calls evidently a Work of the Devil , sometime in due season done , hath been praised ; as Phineas killed a Man , and it was reputed to him for Righteousness ; Abraham also was not only a Homicide , but a Parrici●e ; and Peter sl●w ●wo , but it wa●● Spiritual Wo●k : So we must not only consider the Actions , but the Time , Cause , Will and Difference of Persons , and all other Circumstances . Again , in his 〈…〉 Work , cap 5. It hath been said , Thou shalt not for●wear ; but shalt perform to the Lord thy Oath● But I say unto you , SWEAR NOT 〈…〉 ] Behold the fourth Command , ●hi●h Covetous Men account the least , because they do not account it a Sin to Swear , without which the Command of the Law cannot stand ? For unless Swearing it self be forbidden , False Oaths cannot be taken away , because out of Swearing springs up Forswearing ; for , whosoever swears often , at one time or other swears falsly ; for this Reason Solomon gives that Admonition , Accustom not thy Mouth to Swearing ; for there is much Danger therein . For , as he that accustoms himself to talk much , must needs at one time or other utter Unseasonable Words ; and he that useth frequently to strike with his Hand , cannot but sometimes strike Unjustly ; so he that accustoms himself to Swear in things Convenient , oft-times Forswears himself , even against his Will ( Custom prevailing in him ) in things superfluous ; for we can accustom our selves to any thing when we will , but we cannot turn off that Custom when we will. And what the Judgment of God is against them that swear , Solomon teacheth ; A man , saith he , that Swears much , a Wound shall not depart from his House . If then a Wound depart not from them that swear , how shall it at length depart from them that forswear . Tell me , my Friend , What dost thou get by Swearing ? For if thy Adversary did believe that thou would'st Swear well , he would never force thee to swear at all ; but because he thinks thou wilt swear falsly , therefore it is that he compels thee to swear ; and when thou hast sworn , he doth not sit down as satisfied in the Truth of thine Oath , but goes away full of Revenge , as it were in Condemnation of thy Perjury . An Oath never has a good End ; for , some will judge thou hast sworn for Covetousness ; and some too , that thou hast Forsworn : But they that are willing to suppose well of thee , although they do not believe thou hast sworn FALSLY , yet they are not able to affirm thou hast sworn IN TRUTH : But no man can maintain thou hast done RELIGIOUSLY . By Swearing therefore thou comest into Reproach with thy Enemies , and into Suspicion with thy Friends . But thou wilt say perhaps , What shall I do ; he neither doth nor will believe me , unless I Swear ? Be content rather to lose thy Money then thy Salvation ; set more by thy Soul , then by thy Estate : If thou shouldst lose any part of thy Estate , thou may'st live notwithstanding ; but if thou losest God , whereon wilt thou live ? Dost thou not know , that what thou partest Self-denyingly with for the Fear of God , thou receivest a greater Reward for it , then if thou hadst given Alms ; because , the more we bear the Gross , the more worthily are we crowned for it ? Behold , my Friend , I advise thee not to Force any man to swear ; if thou thinkest he will swear well , avoid it ; or if thou thinkest he will swear amiss , avoid it so much the rather : For although he swear well , yet thou , as far as relates to thy Conscience art become the Cause of his Perjury , because thou compellest him to take an Oath with this Intention , not barely that he should Swear , but that he should Forswear ; for if thou hadst thought he would have sworn honestly , thou wouldst not have forced him to swear at all . Oh foolish man , that compellest another to Swear ! Thou knowest not what thou doest : He , although he forswear himself , yet does it with Advantage ; but thou , without any Advantage , art found a Partaker of his Perjury . He that does not stick at Lying , does not fear Swearing ; for he that tells a Lye , goes beyond the Truth in his Heart ; and he that swears falsly , passes over God in his Words : What then is the Difference between passing over God , and going beyond the Truth , seeing God is Truth it self ? This is the only Difference , That when we Lye , we pass over the Truth in our Heart ; but when we Forswear , we pass over God in Words ; For , to men we give Satisfaction by WORDS ; to God , by CONSCIENCE . God himself , who forbad Forswearing , even he afterward commanded NOT TO SWEAR : He therefore that is not afraid to set light by the Commands of God in Swearing , will not be afraid to do the like in Forswearing . But what wouldst thou have ? Doth he fear God , or doth he not fear him ? If he be one that fears God , he will not Lye , though he be not sworn ; but if he be one that does not fear God , he cannot speak Truth , though he be sworn . Hear , ye CLERGY-MEN , who bring the HOLY GOSPELS for men to swear upon ; How can ye be secure from that Oath , who sow the Seed of Perjury ? He that brings the Fire by which an House is burnt , is he a Stranger to the Burning ? or who reaches a Sword , whereby a man is slain , is not he an Accessory to the Slaughter ? So he that gives the Opportunity of Forswearing , is a Partaker of the Perjury : If it were well done to swear , ye said rightly , that we gave them the Gospel to Swear , not to Forswear ; But now ye know , THAT IT IS A SIN EVEN TO SWEAR WELL , how can ye be acquitted that give the Occasion of Sinning against God ? Let the Fire cease , and there is no Burning ; take away the Sword , and the man is not slain ; SO TAKE AWAY SWEARING , AND THERE IS NO FORSWEARING . Be these things spoaken of them that swear by God ▪ But as for them that swear by the Elements , their Iniquity is more detestable ; for Heaven and Earth , and the rest of the Elements God made for his own Service ; not for men to swear by : For , behold , in the Law it is commanded , that they should swear by none but God : He therefore that swears by Heaven , or by the Earth , or whatsoever it is he swears by , makes a God of it ; Therefore every one commits Idolatry , who swears by any thing besides God , if it were at all lawful to swear , because he does not perform his Oaths to the Lord his God , but to the Elements : And so he commits a double Sin ; first , in that he swears ; and 2 dly , in making a God of that by which he swears , &c. Again , in Chap. 23. Homil. 43. on these words , Wo unto you Blind Guides , who say , Whosoever shall swear by the Temple , it is nothing ; but whosoever shall swear by the Gold of the Temple , he is a Debter — Many Christians ( saith he ) now adayes do so unwisely understand many things ; for lo , if there shall be any Cause , he seems to do a small matter , who swears by God ; but he that swears by the Gospel seems to have done some greater thing : To whom it may be said , Fools ! The holy Scriptures are for God , not God for the Scriptures ; for God is GREATER which sanctifieth the Gospel , then the Gospel which is sanctified of God. Again , Hom 9. on Acts of the Apostles , ch . 3. To this conduces not a little , not to Swear , and not to be Angry ; for , in not being Angry , we shall not have an Enemy ; and cast off a mans Oath , and withal thou shalt cast off those things that concern Wrath , and shalt extinguish all Anger : For Wrath and an Oath are like the Wind. We set forth sail , but there is no benefit of the Sail if there be no Wind : so if we do not cry out , nor swear , we cut the Sinnews of Wrath. Come , tell me for what Cause an Oath was introduced , and why it was allowed ? Let us tell its Original , and whence it sprung up again , and how , and by whom ; and by our Declaration we shall gratifie your Attention : For , he that doth justly , must necessarily be also studious of Wisdom ; and he that is not yet such , is not worthy to hear a Discourse : For , Abraham made Covenants , and sacrificed Sacrifices , and offered Offerings ; and as yet there was not an Oath : Whence then came in an Oath ? When Evils increased , when all things became topsiturvy , when they inclined to Idolatry ; then verily when they appear'd unfaithful , they called God to witness , as giving a Surety for Security for their Words ; for an Oath is a Suretiship , where their Behaviours have no Trust or Credit : Whereupon , first he that swears is taxed , If he have no Credit without an Oath , and the greatest Surety : And because men so little trust one another , they seek God for a Surety , not Man. Secondly , He is in the same Crime who receives an Oath , if he draw God to be a Surety for Contracts ; and say , THAT HE WILL NOT TRVST EXCEPT HE HAVE HIM . Oh monstruous thing ! Oh shameful Disgrace ! Thou a Worm , Dust and Ashes , and a Vapour ; darest thou snatch thy Lord , who art such an one for a Surety , and compellest to accept him ? Tell me , if a Fellow-Servant should say to your Children , striving among themselves , and not trusting one another , Unless the common Master become a Surety , there is no trusting ; would not many Stripes be inflicted , that he might learn , that he should make use of him as a Lord in other things , not in these ? What do I speak of a Fellow-Servant ? For , if one would have a more Venerable Man , would not the Case have Disgrace in it ? But I shall ( saith he ) therefore neither compel him , because this is also amongst men . He may say thus , Sometimes thou may'st not receive a Surety to thine . What then ? And I shall lose ( saith he ) what is given . I would not say this ; but do not thou endure that God be reproached . Therefore he which Compels hath a MORE Unavoidable Punishment then he which Swears . Likewise he also which swears when none requires ; this also is harder , that one swears for a Half-Penny , for a little Commodity , for Unrighteousness . And these things are so dangerous , when there are no Perjuries ; but if Perjuries are committed , then all things are confounded , and both he that swears , and he that receives an Oath , are the Cause . But there are some things that are not known , say they . But sore-seeing these things , thou must do nothing rashly ; but if thou shalt do any thing negligently , take the Penalty of the Inconvenience in thy own Hand ; better so to suffer Loss then otherwise . For , tell me , Thou halest a man to an Oath ; What dost thou seek ? Wouldst thou have him to Forswear ? But this is extream Folly ; for the Loss will turn upon thy own Head : It were better to lose thy Means , then that he should be lost ; wherefore thou dost this to thy own Dammage , and to God's Dishonour ; such is the Soul of a Beast and of a Wicked Man ! But I expect that he may not Forswear . Therefore believe him Without an Oath also . But there are many , say they , who without an Oath dare Defraud , who with an Oath do not do it . Thou deceivest thy self , O Man ! A Man who hath learn'd to Steal and to Wrong a man , will also trample upon an Oath often : But if he hath a Reverence in Swearing , much more in doing Unjustly . But thou wilt say , He suffers this unwillingly . Therefore he is worthy of Excuse . But what shall I say of Oaths of the Courts that are left ? for there thou canst say no such thing ; for there for Six Pence both Oaths and Perjuries are made : For , because a Thunder-Bolt doth not come down from above , and all things are not overturned , thou standest , and WILT * BIND GOD : Why ? That thou mayst get Herbs and Shoes for a small Price , thou callest him to witness . Do we therefore think we do not sin , because they are not punished ? This is the Lord's Mercy , not our Desert . Swear by thy own Child , swear by thy self ; say , So let the Officer keep from my Sides : But thou art afraid of thy Sides ; IS GOD MORE VILE , more Contemptible then thy Head ? Say , So may I not be blind ? But Christ so spareth us , that he FORBIDS US TO SWEAR EVEN BY OUR OWN HEAD . But we do so despise the Glory of God , that he is drawn every where : Ye know not what God is , and with what a Mouth he ought to be invocated . Moreover , when we speak of any Virtuous Man , we say , Wash thy Mouth , that so thou mayst be heedful . But now we vainly distract that Honourable Name , which is a Name above every Name , which is Wonderful in all the Earth , which the Devils hearing do tremble at : OH MOST CONTEMPTIBLE CUSTOM WHICH HATH DONE THAT ! Lastly , If thou shalt impose on any a Necessity of Swearing in the holy House , how horrible an Oath dost thou enjoyn , if thou dost so ? Is it that we abuse that simply , this not so ? Ought not one even to Dread when God is named ? But even among the Jews this Name was so Reverend , that it was written on the Pla●e of the Mitre , and none might bear those Letters of the Name of God , but only the High Priest : And now also we so bear his Name tenderly . If it was not lawful for all to Name God simply , how great Audaciousness is it to call it in Witness ? Tell me now , how great Madness is it ? Behold , I say ▪ and testifie to you , amend those Court-Oaths , and shew me all those that do not obey : Behold , even in your Presence I will command them that are set apart for the Ministry , the House of Prayer , and admonish and shew , THAT IT IS NOT LAWFUL FOR ANY TO SWEAR , nor otherwise neither . Let him therefore be brought to me , whosoever he be , because these things also ought to be done before us , because ye are Children . † Oh Shame ! for , it is Confusion that ye have need to be instructed in some things . Darest not thou that art initiated touch the holy Table ? But that is yet worse , thou which art initiated , darest thou touch the holy Table , and that which it is not lawful for all the Priests to touch , AND SO SWEAR ? but being gone out , thou wouldst not touch the Head of thy Child ; but touchest thou the Table , and doest not dread nor fear ? Bring such to me , I will inflict a just Punishment ; and with Joy will send both away with this Commandment , Do as you list , I * Impose this Law , NOT TO SWEAR AT ALL : What Hope is there of Salvation , when you so contemn and despise all things ? Hast thou therefore received Letters and Badges that thou shouldst lose thy Soul ? What so great thing hast thou gained , as that which thou hast lost ? Hath he forsworn ? Thou hast lost both thy self and him : But hath he not Forsworn ? Even so thou hast lost , who hast driven him to transgress the Commandment . Let us expel this Disease from the Soul : Let * us drive it now from the Court , and from all Merchants & Tradesmen's Shops . It was a greater Labour to us , do not you think , that Worldly things are corrected by the Transgressings of Divine Laws . But he doth not believe , saith he ; for I have also heard this of some , Unless I swear many Oaths they will not believe me : Thou art the Cause of these things , who swearest so promptly and easily . But if this were not , but it were manifest to all , that thou wouldst not swear , believe me , more Credit would be given to thy very BECK , then those who swear abundance of Oaths . Whom therefore do you more believe , me that do not swear , or them that do swear ? But , sayes he , thou art a Prince and a Bishop . What then , if I shall shew thee , that it is not this only ? Answer me in Truth now : If I had sworn alwayes , and at every season , what Priviledge would my Principality have ? No , thou seest that it is not for this : What gainest thou then , tell me now ? Paul Hungerd ; and do thou chuse rather to Hunger then to transgress any of God's Commandments : Why art thou so Unbelieving ? Shalt thou chuse to do and to suffer all things , that thou mayst not swear , and shall not he Reward thee ? But he feeds daily Forswearers and great Swearers , and will he give thee up to Famish , because thou hearkenest to him ? Let all men know , that NONE MAY SWEAR THAT ARE OF THIS CONGREGATION ; and hereby we may be assured , and by this Sign be distinguished from the Greeks and from all men , and not only by the Faith ( or Christian - Profession . ) Let us have this Mark from heavenly things , that we may shine with it every where , as the King's Flock . We are now known by the Mouth and the Tongue , as the Barbarians , and they that know to speak Greek ; for we are discerned from the Barbarians by the Tongue . Tell me now , How are Parrets known ? Is it not that they speak like Men ? And we also may be known , if we speak like the Apostles , and speak as the Angels : For , if any one say , Swear ; let him hear , that Christ hath commanded , EVEN NOT TO SWEAR : This sufficeth to bring in all Virtue . It is a certain Gate of Godliness , a Way bringing on unto the Love of Wisdom ( or Philosophy ) It is a certain Exercise ( or Mastery ) Let us keep these things , that we attain both present and future good things , by the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ , with whom , to the Father , with the holy Spirit , be Glory , Dominion , Honour , now and forever and ever , Amen . These Precepts were because of the Jewish Depravation ; but those perfect ones , to despise and relinquish Riches , stand manfully , lay down thy Life for Preaching ; despise all Earthly things ; have nothing to do with this present Life ; do good to them that unjustly afflict thee ; if thou be defrauded , bless thou ; if any slander thee , honour thou him ; be over all things : It was fit to hear these and such like things ; But now we discourse concerning an Oath . And it is even as if when a man should come to Philosophy , he should draw him away from those his Teachers , and make him spell with Letters and Syllables . Consider now , what a Confusion it would be for a man that hath a w●ighty Scrip , and a Staff , and a Gown to go to the Grammar-School with Boyes , and to learn the same things that they do ; would it not be a Matter of much Laughter ? but more from you ; for there is not so great a Difference betwixt Philosophy and the Elements of Speech , as between the Jewish Matters , and Ours ; but as much as is between Angels and Men. Tell me now , if any should call down an Angel from Heaven , and tell him , That he must stand and hear our Sermons , as if he must be thereby instructed , would it not be a ridiculous and confused thing ? And if it were a ridiculous thing to be yet instructed by these ; tell me now how great Condemnation , and how great Confusion were it , not to give Attention to those former ? And how then is it not Confusion , that a Christian must be instructed , that he must not swear ? But let us repress our Affections , that we be not more laught at . Let us now discourse concerning the Jewish Law to day : What is that , will he say ? Do not use thy Mouth to Swear , nor be familiar with the Holy Name . Why ? For as a Servant , if he be continually scourged , shall not be clear from Marks , so neither he that sweareth . Consider the Wisdom of that Wise Man ; He said not , Do not use thy Mind , but thy Mouth ; because he knew it to be all of the Mouth , and which is easily amended , &c. The Punishment here that is opposed to it , tells us , that it is not Perjury , but Swearing , that is here to be removed ; Therefore TO SWEAR IS A SIN . Verily the Soul is full of such Wounds and Scars . But if thou swear because he doth not believe ; say thou , Believe , or if thou wilt not , swear by thy self ; and I do not say , that thou art contrary to the Law-giver : Far be it ; for , saith he , Let your Word be YEA , YEA , and NAY , NAY ; that herein I may condescend to you , and bring you to this , that I may free you from this Tyrannical Custom . Will you learn why they allowed them of old to Swear , not to Forswear ? It was because they swore by Idols : You must not be confounded in these Laws , in which they that were weak were conversant . For , if I now take a Greek , I do not forthwith enjoyn him this ; but now I admonish him , That Christ must be known : But a Believer , and one who hath learned him , and heard , if he should use the same Indulgence and Liberty , as the Greek , What Profit and Advantage would there be ? Christ hath made a Law , that NONE SWEAR ; Tell me now what is done about this Law , lest perchance coming again , as the Apostle saith , I do not spare . We hope none will dispute whether Chrysostom was against All Swearing , or that he understood Christ's Doctrine as we do ; yet no Body can Promise for them that endeavour to squeeze Swearing out of Christ's SWEAR NOT AT ALL. We have been the larger in this Authority , partly because he excellently disputes it ; and partly , because our Case needs it ; and lastly , to show Christians their Apostacy , that they may reform . Jerom. Libr. Epistol . part 3. Tract . 2. Epist . 2. Of Obedience , Knowledge and Revenge . LII . Thou saidst , if I mistake not , That on this Account thou mayst justly render Evil for Evil , and oughtest to swear with them that swear , because the Lord sometimes swore , and rendred Evil for Evil. First , I know that all things are not fit for us , that are Servants , which are agreeable to the Master , &c. I know the Lord oftentimes swore , who hath forbidden us to Swear ▪ Nor must we rashly speak Evil of , or Blaspheme in this , that he forbad another what he did himself ; because it may not be said , the Lord swore as Lord , whom none forbad to swear : It is not lawful for us as Servants to Swear ; because we are Forbidden by the Law of our Lord to Swear . But lest we should suffer an Offence by his Example , since the time he forbad Us to Swear , neither did he himself ever Swear , &c. Upon Zachary , Book 2. Chap. 8. And love ye not a False Oath ] — As to the Lord 's commanding in the Gospel , But I say unto you , Swear not at all ; but let your Word be YEA , YEA ; NAY , NAY : He that shall Never Swear , can never Forswear : But he that sweareth , let him hear that which is written , Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord thy God in a vain thing ; for 〈◊〉 these things I hate , saith the Lord , according to the words of Malachy , saying , And ye did all that I hate . In Precepts which belong to Life , and are clear , we ought not to ●eek an Allegory , lest we seek a Knot in Rush , as sayes the Comick . On Jeremy 4. Book 1. chap. 3. And thou shalt Swear the Lord liveth in Truth and Righteousness , and Judgment , &c. And how doth the Gospel forbid us to Swear ? But ●ere it is said for a Confession , thou shalt Swear , and for the Condemnation of Idols , by which Israel swore . Lastly , Offences are taken away ●d he sweareth by the Lord ; and what is said in the Old Testament , the Lord liveth , is an Oath , to the condemning of all the Dead , by whom all Idolatry sweareth . And it is also to be minded , that an Oath hath these Companions , Truth , Judgment and Righteousness ; if these be wanting , it is not Swearing , but Forswearing . Also on Matth. Book 1. chap. 5. But I say unto you , Swear not at all , neither by Heaven , &c. The Jews had alwayes this Custom of Swearing by the Elements , as the Prophet's Speech often reproves them . He that sweareth , either reverenceth or loveth him by whom he sweareth : In the Law it is commanded , that we must not swear but by the Lord our God. The Jews Swearing by the Angels , and the City Jerusalem , and the Temple , and the Elements , did worship the Carnal Creatures with the Honour and Observance of God. Lastly , consider , that here the Saviour forbad not to swear by God , but by Heaven , &c. and this was allowed by the Law , as to little ones , that as they offered Sacrifices to God , lest they should sacrifice to Idols , so also they were suffered to Swear by God ; Not that they did this rightly , but that it was better to yield that to God then to Devils . But the Truth of the Gospel doth not receive an Oath , since every faithful Word is for an Oath . Those of after Times , that in some respect allow of an Oath , ground most upon the Authority of Augustine , as he from the larger acceptation of the Word Swear and Oath , which he extends to that which Nazianzen ( as before ) calls but a firm Faithfulness joyned to his words , which yet he will not admit of , but to a Paul , a Planter of Churches , speaking by the Spirit of God to them he had begotten in the Gospel , in Danger to be seduced by False Apostles , and to sleight him , and seek a Proof of Christ speaking in him , compelled by them to seem a Fool in glorying , and so driven , and no otherwise , to seem a Swearer too , yea , even to an Augustine , and so to compel him ( even Augustine ) to say , It is a hard Question ; I have alwayes avoided it . But though he durst not condemn it altogether out of Reverence to the Apostle , which he thought used it , because of the Form of Speech ; yet to shew that he did little encourage men to practise it , as any Act at all of the Worship of God , much less an August Act , He saith , That False Swearing is Deadly ; True Swearing , Dangerous ; No-Swearing , Safe ; God only Swears Safely , who cannot be deceived . Augustine de Sermone Domini , Serm. 28. LIII . And Augustine himself confesseth , That it was usual to alledge Christianity for not Swearing , bringing in one Saying , It is not lawful for a Christian to Swear , when an Oath is required of him ; Lam a Christian ; it is not lawful to swear . And on Psalm 88. as allowing the Unlawfulness , he saith , It is well that God hath forbidden men to Swear , lest by Custom of it ( inasmuch as we are apt to Mistake ) we commit Perjury . There is none but God can safely Swear , &c. And in that very Book , which is alledged for it , he saith , I say unto you , SWEAR NOT AT ALL , lest by Swearing ye come to a Facility of Swearing ; from a Facility to a Custom ; and from a Custom ye fall into Perjury . But if any think that Book makes most for them , let them consider the Author hath retracted it ; for what Cause let himself speak in the end of his Book of Retractations : For sure , that which we have here cited out of it , agreeth with his other Works , which contain much more to this Purpose . Where , sayes he , wouldst thou chuse to walk ? Upon the Brink of a Precipice , or far from it ? I think far from it . So he which swears , walks in the Border , and walketh with unsure Feet , because humane : If thou stumblest , down thou goest ; if thou fallest , down thou goest . We would fain know , if a most August Act of God's Worship be nighest the Pit's Brink , or farthest from it ? for there all ought to chuse to walk ; in whose Way they that walk , walk safely ; their Place is sure , and their Foot-steps shall not slide ; but the Wicked's Feet are in slippery Places , where Augustine says , Swearers walk . Consider what he saith on those words of Christ in Mat. 5. It is the Righteousness of the Pharisees , not to Forswear ; This he confirmeth , who forbiddeth to swear , which * belongeth to the Righteousness of the Kingdom of Heaven : For , as he which doth not speak , cannot speak a Lye , so he cannot Forswear , which doth not Swear . He goes on to excuse Paul , and sayes , That an Oath is not among good things , but among † evil things , and used for the Infirmity of others , which is Evil , from which we pray , that we may be daily delivered . But there is this to be said for Augustine , and some others after him , that he and they write not clearer in a Point so constantly maintained ; His Horizon then was over-casting apace . Apostacy , as a mighty Torrent , did not only swell and beat against the Simplicity of the Christian-Doctrine and Discipline ; but like an Unruly and impetuous Sea broak down the Banks of Primitive Society , and made way for all sort of Superstition , worldly Interest & Fraud ; that , to say no more then he did , was to incur , perhaps , the Censure of the Grandees of his Age , who had joyn'd Earthly Policy to Christian-Religion , and cast off the Blessed Yoak of their Self-denying Lord , to swim in the Delicious Liberty of the World : A Time full of such Circumstances as seem'd to conspire the Return of Oaths , that were not dead , but retired only : For as men grew False and Distrustful , Truth became burdensom , and Yea and Nay no Security with them ; and therefore declin'd , or rather exil'd them their Government ; Old Judaism or Gentilism pleas'd them better . 'T was harder Living that Watchful Life that was sufficient to credit a Yea or Nay , then to take an Oath , that dependeth upon the saying of so many Words only : This was considerable , and made Swearing then , and continues it grateful to our very Times . But sad it is , that Oaths rid thus in Sate , while Integrity went Barefoot , and Evangelical Yea and Nay turn'd off for a Non-sufficient , and that too , not without Fines , Prisons , and a great deal of Reproach . However , we must acknowledge , that the Gravity and Christian Care of this Person , and other his Contemporaries , appeared in not only disswading , but deterring those Ages from the Brink ( for so he calls Swearing at all ) and turning their Faces after the Woman , now on her Flight into the Wilderness : During all which Time , the Witnesses , though fewest in Number , and mystically cloathed in Sack-cloth , forbore not to prophesie even in this Particular . And we hope , having no certain Knowledge to the contrary , that most of them , at least that were Men fearing God , and serving him according to what they knew and in that Manner they were perswaded was most acceptable to him . And as Irenaeus said of the Poets and Philosophers , These Men , every one seeing that which was connatural from Part of the Divine-sown-Reason , spoak excellently , and where right and consistent with themselves , they are ours , Iren. lib. 5. cap. 18. So we sincerely declare of Men differing from us , that as we desire the Good of all , so we can own the Good in all , and the Truth in all , and receive it from them , though in other Respects our Adversaries ; and would have all to do the like with us and each other : And howbeit our Adversaries may have hard Thoughts of some of the Persons our Matter leads us to instance , as Men interessed in the Doctrine and Practices of those darker Times they lived in , and of us for making Use of such for Authorities ; yet we hope they would also judge it an hard and very cruel Thing to repute them utter Cast-awayes . And though we know that Men differ within themselves , and all of them more or less from the Truth , yet since there may be some Truth and Sincerity , we cannot but acknowledge and embrace : And we hope , the Reasons and Authorities of others they bring , and the Concessions and Confessions they make , may , and indeed ought to be of Weight in that Point , at least to shew , that it is no new , strange or unreasonable Thing for us to refuse Oaths . And though some might with a Mixture of Sup●rstition and W●ll-worship , undertake and maintain that Strictness and Preciseness , which some of the holy Ancients by the Spirit of Truth were led to practise ( the ancient Hist●ries of whom , from Eye-Witnesses , as the Word signifies , of some of them , we in a great Part believe ) And some later more Enlightened and Zealous Men , taking Offence thereat , but especially at the Hypocrisie and Abomination , palliated by such fair Pretences , have streined much in Opposition to that Evangelical Doctrine , yet is the Doctrine nevertheless a Truth in it self . Nor can we believe that all that were accounted Hereticks , were out of the Catholick or Universal Church ; for the Word Catholick signifies Vniversal , containing all that are in the Church ( that is in God the Father of the Lord Jesus Christ ) in all Times , and those were not all of the same Mind in all Things , as may be read in the Holy Scriptures , and also in Eusebius and other Ecclesiastical Histories , where Men are commended for Holiness and Virtue , yet at much Difference in some Things . Synesius , though he believed not the Resurrection , was chosen to minister , and afterward was made a Bishop , the Charity of Christians was so great in that Age. And some accounted Hereticks , suffered Martyrdom , that are commended or excused by Eusebius ; one in particular that dyed with Polycarpus , and another called Asclepius , called Marcionites . See also the beginning of his eighth Book concerning the Divisions among them that afterward suffered for the Testimony of the Universal or Catholick Truth ; nor can we receive their Judgment , that branded those with the Name of Hereticks , Pelagians , &c. who denyed Swearing in those declining Ages , and suppressed their Works under that Name and Aspersion only ; not allowing them to speak for themselves to us of latter Times . We see how unjustly we our selves are aspersed in almost every Doctrine we hold , and that under Pretence of serving God ; particularly , with seeking to work our Salvation by our own Power , and when they have made us this Belief , they bestow Pelagianism upon it ( for Fathers have Right to name their own Children ) whereas of all other People , we especially disclaim our own Ability , and wait to be renewed and guided by the Spirit of Christ , and to be found in his Righteousness , and therefore on the other hand reputed Phanaticks , Enthusiasts , &c. and mocked for being moved by the Spirit , following the Light , &c. But let their Example or Authority be as it will , or however they were in other Respects , the Doctrine of the ancient primitive Fathers , and Practice of that Church , as also the Doctrine of famous Men among themselves , neither of which Sort dare they condemn for Hereticks , do sufficiently defend them from the Aspersion of Heresie in that Particular : And so we shall come to our remaining Testimonies , it being our Business , not to maintain every one of their Principles we cite ; but this Doctrine of Swear not at all , to have had the Voice of several Ages to confirm it . The ancient Waldenses , reputed to have continued Vncorrupted with the Grosness of the Apostacy , ever since the Apostles Times ( see their History in P. Perin , S. Moreland and Bp Vsher de Succes . ) we have good Cause to say , denyed the taking of any Oath in what Sense the Primitive Christians and Fathers refused , and that was altogether . Sure , their Enemies charg'd them with it for above three hundred Years , and we cannot find they then denyed the Charge : We suppose none will attempt to prove they did ; Though one of our Adversaries joyns with theirs , traducing them for Perjurers , and with them abuses that worthy and learned Man Bp. Vsher , who defends them from that improbable and contradictory Aspersion , of Lying and Forswearing , and yet of Denying to Swea● ; who sayes , that they were as far from Lying and Forswearing , as their Enemies were from Mod●sty and Truth , which did appear in that they were charg'd by them , Not to swear at all : Peruse that part of his Book de Successione , where he treats of them ; and where also you may read of their Succession , how that the Syrians & Armenians came out of the East into Thracia , thence in process of Time into Bulgaria and Sclavonia , thence into Italy and Lumbardy , and were called by several Names , of several People , or at several Times , as Manichees , Waldenses , Albingenses , Cathari or Puritans , Patrins , Publicans , Humiliati , &c. who were charged with denying Swearing ; And how that several of the better sort of the Clergy , and of the nobler Laity ( who refused the present Use of Baptism and the Lord's Supper ) were burnt under the Name of Manichees . Suarez also reckons-up the Catharists , Alba. Bagnald , and others which Prateolus and Castro relate , the Waldenses , the Anabaptists , &c. And which Jansenius also out of Augustine , Epist . 89. the Pelagians out of Hilary Syracusanus , Epist . 88. Bernard homil . 69. on Cant. The Fathers , sayes he , seem to favour this Opinion , especially Basil , hom . in Psal . 14. Chrysostom hom . 19.78 . ad popul . and 17. on Mat And Theophylact on Mat. 5. Origen Tract 35. Mat. Tertullian de Idololat . Clem. Rom. l. 6. Constitut . Apost . Maldonat on Mat. 5.34 . saith , the Anabaptists , the Wickliffists , some Syracusans , a kind of Pelagians , denyed Swearing , and that Origen was not far off that Opinion . Here the Hereticks , as accounted , and the Fathers are reckoned up together , as holding the same Opinions : Sure in this they were not Hereticks ; for then the Fathers should be condemned with them , and called Hereticks too , as well as they , or else these Men are partial and contradictory . On Jam. 5. of the words of the Apostle , thus , Ser. 30. Perhaps it is meet for the Lord alone to swear , who cannot forswear . And so he goes on to shew how hard it is for men to avoid Perjury . In Serm. 3. ad competentes : Let them not only abstain from Perjury , but from Swearing ; because he doth not Lye who saith , A man Swearing much , shall not depart from Iniquity , and the Plague shall not depart from his House , Eccles . 23. But if it were an August Act of the Worship of God , he would on the contrary have exhorted at least , if not commanded them to swear , which we never read any Command for , but in Opposition to Idols , even in the time of the Old-Testament-Writings , as the Testimonies before alledged declare , and in the time of the New , no Command at all ; but on the contrary , a Prohibition by the Lord himself , and another by his Apostle , nor any Example ; for that of Paul's was but an Asseveration , as by the Testimonies already produced , and to be alledged appears : For besides those of the Fathers and other Doctors , of late Bp. Ro. Sanderson in his Oxford Lectures , shows , that is sometimes used in the Form of an Oath which is no Oath ; and so he defendeth Joseph from breaking God's Command , that is , not to have sworn so ; and therefore not to have sinned , but to have used an Asseveration , as if he had said , as sure as Pharaoh liveth ye are Spyes : So may Paul be defended against the breaking Christ's Command , as if he had said , as sure as ye , or as some Greek Copies have it , We Rejoyce in Christ Jesus : For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , which they translate , I protest by , hath sometimes the same signification that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , yea , hath , as may be seen in Scapula ; For he sayes , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ( translated , I protest by ) is a Particle , sometimes of granting and affirming ; sometimes it is put for verily , indeed ; and he interprets 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the same word , which is translated yea , which Scapula saith , is also sometimes used in Swearing , and cites Aristophanes and Xenophon for it : And that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used also in Composition , for affirming , as in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , profusus , lavishing ; which cannot signifie Swearing . And how easily might the Transcriber , through that common Use , alter a Letter , being of the same signification , seeing in that very Verse , in some Copies , there is not only in another word an Alteration of a Letter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 & 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , our and your , but in another word five Letters , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 & 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , referring it to the Verse before ; yea , a whole Word of Seven Letters added , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . And of about Thirty Greek Copies there are not Two of them that agree , but they interfer , some in one place , some in another ; insomuch that there are Thousands of various Readings , which many of the ancient Fathers diversly follow , some one , some another . See the ( various Lections ) Variae Lectiones Graec. Nov. Test . in Bp. Walton's Polyglot , vol. 6. also the Preface and Beza's Epistle therein : And consider how hard a thing it is to construe , limit , and lay the Interpretation of the Sayings of Christ and his Apostles , and the Weight of a Doctrine , and that as men would avoid Penalties too , upon a Letter ( which yet alters not the Signification ) upon Credit of the Transcribers , especially in Paul's Epistles , wherein Peter sayes , many things are hard to be understood , and wrested by the Vnlearned , which he must needs intend in such Learning as he himself had , and that was not of Worldly Academics ; but from the Holy Spirit . And these words , which are joyned with that Particle , are not such words as men use in Swearing , but for a Ground of his Fidelity , and a Remedy against their Incredulity , and questioning of the Weight of his Assertions , amongst whom other Teachers were preferred , and who compelled him to speak as a Fool , he says , even to commend himself . So that it is not strange , if to them , and not to other Churches , he used such forcible Asseverations from the Testimony that they had of him , of the Truth and Work of Christ in ●im , and the Record thereof upon his Soul , and his Joy therein , that he spoak the Truth to them , and did not lye ; so that he brings his Perfections against their Imperfections , to gain Belief , which can amount to no more then a Voluntary Condescension for the time being , and cannot prove or countenance a Compulsory , Promissory , Formal , Ceremonial Oath to be exacted or taken up for the future . But Mark , that the word Oath , or Swear , used both by Christ and the Apostle James in their Prohibition , is never used by Paul in his Asseverations , neither doth he ever apply it to Brethren ; b●t speaking to them of the Oath that was in old time , and of men ( indefinitely ) that use to swear , he saith , Men swear , and to them an Oath is for Confirmation ; that is , as among the Jews and Heathen ; he doth not say to Vs , or to You ; or We , or Ye swear , who are not in Strife , which , if had that been true , it might have stood the present Oath-Advocates in stead : So that such as will have it , that Paul swore , must being the word swear , or Oath , to prove it ; But if they could ▪ his Example then were not enough to invalidate to us now the Command of Christ , for the Abolishing of Swearing , no more then his shaving his Head at Cenchrea , because he had a Vow ; or his purifying himself in the Temple , and offering with the four Jews that had a Vow ; or his circumcising of Timothy , because of the Jews , can warrant us to the Observation of those legal Rites and Ceremonies , which so long since are not only dead , but deadly , as the Fathers and Bp. Sanderson distinguish about them . And those that would therefore bring in Swearing and Vows , might under the same Colour , bring in sacrificing and circumcising too . LIV. ISIDORUS PELUSIOTA , who as Euagrius Schol. writes , lived at the same time with Cyrill , and that the Fame of his Sayings and Doings was spead far and near , and rise in every man's Mouth , that He led on Earth the Life of an Angel , and wrote many notable Works , amongst which are his Epistles , in one whereof he writeth against Swearing thus ; If thou art of our Flock , and art ordered under a good Shepherd , deny the Nature of Wild Beasts , and obey his Voice that Forbiddeth to Swear AT ALL. Moreover not to Swear is , not to require an Oath of another : Now , if thou wilt not swear , neither require thou an Oath of another , for two Causes ; either because he who is asked loves Truth , or on the contrary to Lye : If the man speaks Truth usually , he will alwayes speak Truth without an Oath ; but if he is a Lyar , he will Lye , though he Swear : Therefore for both these Causes , one ought not to require an Oath . LV. CHROMATIUS , Bishop of Aquileia , about or not long after that time , upon these words , But I say unto you , Swear not at all , paraphraseth thus ; The Law ( saith he ) given by Moses received a Growth , Proficiency or Perfection by the Grace of the Doctrine of the Gospel . In the Law it was commanded , not to Forswear ; but in the Gospel NOT TO SWEAR : Which very thing heretofore the Holy Ghost did premeditate that Solomon should command or teach , saying , Let not thy Mouth use to Swear . And again , As a Servant beaten continually , is not lessened from the Paleness of his Stripes ; so every one that sweareth , shall not be purg'd from Sin. Wherefore it is not meet for us to Swear AT ALL : For , what need is there for any of us to Swear , seeing that it is not at all LAWFUL FOR US TO LYE ; whose Words ought always to be so True , so very Faithful , that they may be accounted for Oaths . And therefore the Lord not only forbids us to Forswear , BUT EVEN TO SWEAR ; that we may not seem to speak Truth ONLY when we swear ; That we may not think that those whom he hath appointed to be True in all their Speech , may have Liberty to Lye without an Oath : For this is the Cause of an Oath , Because that every one who sweareth , doth swear to this End , that he will speak that which is true , and therefore the Lord would have no Difference to be between their Oath and their Word : Because as in an Oath there ought to be no Perfidiousness , so in our Words there ought to be no Lye , in that both Perjury and Lying is condemned by the Punishment of the Judgment of God , seeing the Scripture saith , The Mouth which Lyeth killeth the Soul : Therefore whosoever speaketh Truth , sweareth ; because it is written , A Faithful Witness doth not Lye. And therefore holy Scripture ( not without Cause ) often relates , that God hath sworn , because whatsoever is spoaken of God , who is true , and cannot lye , is counted for an Oath , because all which he speaks is true — Now we find God sometimes swearing , but it is for the Perfidiousness of the Jewish Infidelity , who think that all Truth consists in the Credit of an Oath ; Therefore also God would swear , that they who would not trust God speaking , might trust him when he swore : Therefore our Lord saith , Ye have heard it said of old , Thou shalt not Forswear ; But I say unto you , SWEAR NOT AT ALL , &c. LVI . THEODORET on Deut. 6. pag. 57. Why doth the Law command , that they should swear by God ? Lest they should swear by false Gods : For he said the same by the Prophet , If thou takest the Names of Baalam out of thy Mouth , and shalt swear , The Lord liveth with Truth : And here , when he had said , Thou shalt fear the Lord thy God , and him only shalt thou serve , and shalt cleave unto him and shalt swear by his Name , he subjoyned , Ye shall not w●k ●ter other or strange Gods , which are of the Gods of the Nations , which are round about you . Lyra saith the same . LVII . Ordinary Gloss . on Mat. 5.37 . hath this Sentence , A Faithful Speech ought to be accounted for an Oath . LVIII . Johannes Damascenus , Parallel . lib. 3. cap. 16. bringeth a Testimony of one Nilus , against Swearing . There was one nam'd NILUS in Aegypt , a Martyr , mention'd by Eusebius . Another Bishop of Constantinople , spoaken of by Socrates , both very famous ; the words are these : It is not profitable to Swear , but very pernicious , and execrable and abominable : Wherefore hereafter make an End of Swearing ; nor commit such a thing , as that thy Tongue use Oaths . In the same place he alledgeth Testimonies out of J. Chrysostom , Hom. 13. ad Populum Antiochenum . LIX . CYRILL , whom Evagrius Scholast . styles Renown'd , in his Commentary on Jeremy the 4th ; And shall swear , the Lord liveth in Truth , and in Judgment , and in Righteousness ; saith , Let us look , who swear , how we do not swear in Judgment , but without Judgment ; so that our Oaths are by Custom rather then Judgment ; we are lashed therefore , and the Word reproving that same thing , saith , and if he shall swear the Lord liveth in Truth , in Righteousness and Judgment : For we know it is said in the Gospel by the Lord unto his Disciples , But I say unto you , that you Swear NOT AT ALL. But let us consider also this Saying , and if God grant , both shall be rewarded : For , perhaps , it first behoveth to swear in Truth , in Judgment , and in Righteousness ; and after one hath made Proficiency , he may be made worthy NOT TO SWEAR AT ALL , but may have YEA , not needing Witnesses that IT IS SO ; and may have NAY , not needing Witnesses that IT IS VERILY NOT So. And sayes Cyrill further , Let none because he hears that God swore to Abraham , use to swear : For , as that which is called Wrath in God , is not Wrath ; nor doth it signifie a Passion , but a Punishing Power , or some such like Motion ; so neither is Swearing SWEARING : For , God doth not Swear ; but shews the Certainty , that what he saith shall come to pass , certainly : For the Oath of God is his own Word , filling the Hearers , and making every one believe , that what he hath promised and said , shall surely come to pass . LX. CASSIODORUS , on Psalm 94. saith , Hence it is , that men are forbidden to swear , because by their own Power they cannot perform their Promises , This Cassiodorus was Famous about the year 500. LXI . OLYMPIODORUS was also Famous about the same time , who on Eccl. 8. saith thus , Keep the Mouth of the King , and do not study concerning the Word of the Oath of God , but go far from the Face of it , viz. of an Oath ; that is , Refrain and depart from it , and do not AT ALL endure to take an Oath into thy Mouth . LXII . ISIDORUS HISPALENSIS was famous about that time , and liv'd with him they calld St. Gregory , who disliked the bringing in the Title of Universal Bishop , and also the Use of Swearing : his Words are these , Many are slow to believe which are moved at the Belief of the Word : But they do grieveously offend , who compel them to Swear that speak to them . LXIII . ANTIOCHUS said to be a Man famous for Holiness & Learning , living in Palestine about the time of Heraclius , the Emperor , that was about the Year 614. In his Pandects of Scripture , Hom. 62. concerning Swearing saith thus in the Greek ( which see ; for the Latine Translation is in some things imperfect ) The old Law , as giving Laws to Children , which for their Age were not capable of more holy Doctrine , not unseasonably commands , To Swear nothing to their Neighbour in Deceit ; But us our Lord and Saviour commandeth , NOT TO SWEAR AT ALL , neither out of Season , nor in Season ; for he saith to us , Let your YEA be YEA , and your NAY , NAY ; for whatsoever is more , is of the Evil. And saith he to the first People of a Stiff Neck , I commanded , Thou shalt not forswear , but shalt perform thy Vows unto the Lord , as to them that were Hard-hearted and Disobedient to me : But to you that believe in me , to whom I have given Power to become the Sons of God , that are born again of the holy Spirit , I command , NOT TO SWEAR AT ALL , neither little , nor great Oaths ; that a Difference may plainly appear who are Bastards , and who true Sons . Let us therefore , Dear Friends , fear him , who hath vouchsafed us so much Honour , even the Lord and Father , with all Fear ; as sincere ingenuous Servants let us keep his Commandments , NOT TO SWEAR AT ALL , lest he say as in Isa . 1. I have nourish'd and brought up Children , and they have rebell'd against me : Let 's not be Sleighters and Despisers of this Commandment of the Lord ; for those things that are said and done without an Oath , are more credited by Men , and more pleasing to God. LXIV . In the next Century , BEDA , an English man , the most famous of those Dayes , and styl'd Venerable , in his Exposition upon these words , Before all things , my Brethren , swear not , &c. saith , Because he desires entirely to draw out the deadly Poison of the Tongue in his Hearers , he forbad to detract or slander any man , or to judge his Neighbour , who forbad to grieve in Adversities , which are open Sins ; he adds this also ( seeming light to some ) that he may take away the Custom of Swearing . For that this also is not to be esteem'd a light matter , plainly appears to them , that carefully consider that Sentence of the Lord , where he faith , Of every idle Word that men shall speak , they shall give Account in the Day of Judgment . [ That ye fall not into Condemnation . ] Therefore ( saith he ) I restrain you from the Fault of Swearing , lest by Swearing frequently true things , ye fall sometimes also into Forswearing ; but stand so far from the Vice of Forswearing , that you will not Swear neither , but by the greatest Necessity . But he also falls under the Judgment of Guilt , who although he never Forswear , yet sweareth true oftener then there is need ; namely , he offends in the very Idleness of superfluous Speech , and he offendeth the Judge , which forbad both every unprofitable Word and OATH . From this chief man among the English of that time , it is manifest that this was the Doctrine they then held , as further appears from H. Spelman , that learn'd English Knight , in his Book of Brittish Councils , Canons , &c. in the Exceptions or select Collections of Egbert , Arch Bishop of York , Artic. 19. That no Priest wha●soever may swear an Oath , but let him speak all things simply , in Purity ond Truth . And in the same Author and Council , Art. 18. the chief of Monasteries , Priests & Deacons should say ( without Swearing ) when they were to purge and clear themselves , only thus , I speak the Truth in Christ , I lye not . And in pag. 259. In England , at the Council of Berghamst●d about the Year 750. Artic. 17. That a Bishop or a King's Word or Affirmation without an Oath is irrefragable . This agrees with Blastaris Canons above mention'd . And at this Day in some Countries , as the Electoral Arch-Bishops in Germany , of Colen , Mentz and Triers , and many Noble Men in their Station , speak without an Oath , upon their Honour , &c. Certainly then it is much below the Nobility of true Christians in their Spiritual Station to Swear , as Chrysostom and the Ancients have well observ'd . LXV . HAIMO lived about 840. who on the Revelations saith , That it 's lawful only for Men and Angels to swear ; but to Men it is forbidden . LXVI . AMBROSIUS ANSBERTUS , Gallus Presbyter : Seeing the Lord cohibits the Faithful from every Oath , saying , Swear not at all , neither by Heaven , &c. but let your Yea be Yea , and your Nay , Nay ; what abounds more then them is from the Evil : Who stretcheth out his Hand to Heaven , and sweareth by him that liveth forever , Are not his Sayings and Actings set for Examples for Believers to imitate ? But only in that men are often deceived by an Oath ; but he , who is the Truth , never is deceived ; for he would not have prohibited men from an Oath if he had not known Sin to be in it : For , what do we understand to be figured by the Hand of the Angel , unless ( as before noted ) a Dispensation of Redemption of Mankind ? For , his Hand is the Operation of our Salvation ; although also , if it may be so said , the same Son be his Right-Hand , as when the Word of the Father speaketh , he sheweth that he is the Word of the Father . LXVIII . THEOPHYLACT , Arch-Bishop of the Bulgarians , whom some place in the Ninth Century , others after ; to be sure very Famous ; being as it were their Apostle ; in his Comment on Mat. 5. saith , To swear , or adjure more to Yea or Nay , is of the Devil . Moreover ( sayes he ) if thou shouldst say , That the Law also given to Moses was evil , because it commandeth to swear , Learn , that then it was not Evil to swear ; but after Christ , it is Evil , as also to be circumcised ; and in brief , whatsoever is * Jewish : For , it is convenient for a Child to suck , but not at all for a Man. LXIX . Barnard ; The Truth needs not an Oath . De modo bene vivendi , Ser. 32. De perjurio . A Faithful Word holds the Place of an Oath ; as he cannot Lye who doth not Speak , so he cannot Forswear who doth not undertake to Swear : grounded on Matthew 5. LXX . PASCHALIUS RATBERTUS on Mat. 5. Ye have heard , &c. In this place , as also every where in those things , the Perfection in Righteousness is renew'd ; for by what every one swears , he either worships , loveth or fears it ; Therefore by the Law , for the carnal People it was lawful to swear by God , and this was allow'd as to little Ones , that as they offer'd Sacrifices to God , lest they should offer them to Idols ; so also it was permitted to them to swear by God : Not that they did this well ; but because it was better to give it to God then to Devils . LXXI . OTHO BRUNFELSIUS on Mat. 5. But let your Word be Yea , &c. That is the Duty of a Christian man , to be so sure in his Words , that being Unsworn he surpass any Jew or Heathen , swearing by all his holy Things , namely in these bare Words only , Yea , Yea ; Nay , Nay : Such Faithfulness & Constancy is commended in good men by prophane Authors ; Read Seneca , Cicero , Valerius Maximus . But thou wilt say , I shall not be trusted , unless I swear : Even so it is permitted by the Popes , to swear good Words in a good Cause . But such Distrust ought not to reign in the Faithful : But if we trust not Words , what should an Oath do ? It is a Proverb , None is less trusted then he which shall often swear . Moreover , Who gave Power to Popes , to break the Command of God ? LXXII . DRUTHMARUS on Math. 5. Lest the Jews should Swear by Idols Names , the Lord suffered them to swear by his own Name . — The Lord taught us Perfection , that such Trust is to be among Christians , that there should be no need to interpose the Name of God for Witness . LXXIII . JANSENIUS on Matth. 5. If all Christians were such as they ought to be , it would certainly be needless both to require and take an Oath — I think this more Christian ; and not to Swear at all , nor Compel to Swear , more Spiritual — Yea and Amen are the same , 2 Cor. 1. not Swearing , but Affirming : So Christ swore not . See Bernard , Hom. 69. in Cant. De more bene vivendi , Serm. 32. LXXIV . ALBERTUS MAGNUS , on Mat. 5. Swearing is by Indulgence . Thomas Aquinas cites Rabanus on Mat. 5. LXXV . Alex. de Ales citeth HUG . CARDINAL , saying , The Lord Forbad Swearing , lest any should desire to swear as a Good Thing , also that none might fall into Perjury . LXXVI . REMIGIUS on Rom. 1. Who never Swears , never Forswears . LXXVII . RUFFINUS on Psal . 14. Not to Swear at all is of Perfect Men. See also Smaragdus on Mat. 5. Titelmannus on Psal . 14. Brugensis on Mat. 5. Ludolphus Carthusianus , vita Christi , part . 2. cap. 12. Rupertus , de operibus spiritus sancti , fol. 453. Baptista Folengius , on Psal . 15. Nic. Lyra and Ordinary Gloss on Mat 5. LXXVIII . EUTHYMIUS ZAGABONUS , on Matth. 5. p. 43. saith thus ; Again , ye have heard , that it hath been said to them of old time , Thou shalt not Forswear , &c. but I say unto you , Swear not at all , &c. Now the old Law saith , Thou shalt not Forswear , but shalt offer to the Lord thine Oaths ; which he added that he might put Fear into the Swearer , that he should not Forswear , knowing that God , which knows all things , undertakes the Oath . [ But I say unto you , Swear not at all ] For he that easily sweareth , sometimes perchance may Forswear , by the Custom of Swearing ; but he that Swears by no means , will never Forswear . Besides , thou that swearest , so be thou do not Forswear , thou observest the Worship of God ; but Swearing by no means , thou dost promote it : And the other is the part of mean and imperfect Philosophy ; but this of that which is the highest and perfect . The other , Thou shalt not Forswear , is written in the Book of Exodus ; but this , Thou shalt restore to the Lord thine Oaths , in the Book of Deuteronomy , but in other words : Now he commanded this , lest they should swear by Gods of a false Name . Again , Not to Swear , and not to require an Oath , comes to the same thing : For , how canst thou induce thy Brother unto that , which thou avoidest thy self ; if so be that thou art a Lover of thy Brother , and not rather of Money ? Nor by Heaven ; for it is the Throne of God , &c. Lest they should think , that he forbad to swear by God only , in saying , By God , he adds also other kind of Oaths , by which then the Jews did swear ; for he that sweareth by these things , sweareth again by God , who fills these things , and rules them ; for they have these things in Honour for him , and not for themselves ; for he saith by the Prophet , Heaven is my Throne , and the Earth is my Foot-stool ; the Prophet manifesting by this , that God filleth all things : Do not I fill Heaven and Earth ? David also saith , The City of the Great King. Neither by thy Head. Therefore thou shouldst not swear the meanest Oath ; I say , even by thy own Head , lest thou proceed to greater , or by any other manner ; for the Creature is also the Possession of God ; And again , the Oath is made by God , who hath it ( the Creature ) in his Power ; for , although it ( the Head ) be made thine , yet it is not thy Work , which is manifest from this , That thou canst not make one Hair white or black . But let your Words be Yea , Yea ; Nay , Nay , &c. Let your Speech be when ye affirm , Yea ; and when ye deny , Nay ; and use only these for , or instead of Oaths to Confirmation , and no other then Yea and Nay ; what is adjoyned besides these , he calleth an Oath . Quest . But if an Oath be of the Devil , how did the old Law permit 〈◊〉 : Answ . Because the Sacrifices of Living Creatures were also of Evil , and by the Deceit of Idols ; yet the Law permitted them , because of the Infirmity of the Hebrews : For , whereas they were Gluttons and Smell-Feasts , they lov'd the Sacrifices of Idols ; and whereas also they were Unbelieving , they also loved an Oath : And that they should not afterwards either sacrifice to Idols , or swear by Idols , the Law permitted them to sacrifice and to swear ; and if there were any thing else of that kind , they transferred all unto God. Now it was to come to pass , that in process of time , he would cut off these things also , by a more sublime Law to be brought in ; because it is good for Infants to be suckled ; but for men it is very unfit : There we allow this to them that live after the manner of Infants ; but we with-draw or prohibit them that are manly from it . Quest . What then is to be done , if any require an Oath , yea , compel to Swear ? Answ . Let the Fear of God be more forcible then this Compulsion or Necessity ; and chuse rather to suffer all things , then to transgress the Command , sith in every Precept Force and Violent Danger will often meet with thee : And unless thou esteemest the Command of God every where more forcible , all things will depart from thee Void and Unperformed . In the following Passages the Lord saith , The Kingdom of Heaven suffered Violence , and the Violent take it by Force . LXXIX . OECUMENIUS , a Famous Greek Writer , about Ann. 1070. writes on Jam. 5.12 . thus , But some will say , If any be forced to swear , what is to be done ? We say , that the Fear of God shall be stronger then the Force of him that compels . But some may doubt , How it comes to pass , that Grace doth not command this , as did the Old Law , affording Praise to him that did swear by the Name of the Lord ? We say , The old Law leading the Jews not to swear by Devils , appointed to swear by God , as it commanded them to sacrifice , drawing them from the Sacrifice of Idols or Devils : But when it had sufficiently taught them to have a Religious Respect to God , then it rejected Sacrifices as unprofitable , seeking not a Sacrifice by Beasts , but a Broaken Spirit ; that is , a sweet whole Burnt-Sacrifice , enflamed by the Fire of Love. That ye fall not into Hypocrisie ( so some Copies have it ; for the words in Greek are something alike ) Hypocrisie he saith , or Condemnation , which follows them that Swear without sparing , and through the Custom of Oaths are carryed out to Forswear . The Word Hypocrisie signifies thus much , that which being one thing appears another ; How then falleth he into Hypocrisie that sweareth ? Answ . When he that is believed for the Oath 's sake to be true , and yet Transgression following , is declared to be a Lyar , instead of a true Man , not producing Yea in Certainty . He forbids to swear by God , because of Perjury ; but by Heaven and other Oaths , that men should not bring these things into the Honour of God ; for all that swear , do swear by the Greater . LXXX . ANSHELMUS , Bishop of Canterbury , about Ann. 1090. on that place of Mat. 5. thus , pag. 38. Thou shalt not Forswear , &c. Moses seeing that he could not take away Swearing , takes away Perjury . And again , Because men have in great Reverence those things by which they swear , lest they should make the Creatures Gods to themselves , he commands them , to render their Oaths to God , and not to swear by Creatures : But the Lord removes them more perfectly from Perjury , when he forbids them to Swear at all . LXXXI . The Ancient WALDENSES we have good Cause to say , Deny'd the taking of any Oath in what Sense the Primitive Christians and Fathers refused , and that was altogether : To be sure their Enemies charged them with it for above Three Hundred Years ; and we cannot find , that they then deny'd the Charge : We suppose none will attempt to prove they did ; for they were well known in the World as to this Particular . LXXXII . And Bp. USHER pleads for them , against the Papists , who were Swearers . LXXXIII . Likewise , a People of Albi in France , Ann. 1176. held , It was Unlawful to Swear . LXXXIV . The Plowman's Complaint , containing , as abundance of mournful Applications to God , so many notable and serious Reprehensions of the Lapst , Erroneous and Cruel Nature of Men ; among others it hath this notable Passage to our Purpose , Lord , thou givest us a Command of Truth , in bidding us say , Yea , Yea ; and Swear for Nothing ; but , Lord , he ( Pope ) that calls himself thy Vicar on Earth , hath broken the Commandment , so makes a Law to Compel men to Swear . Who was the Author of this , is not certainly known ; but to be sure it was embraced of the Wickliffians , as worthy of their Patronage ; and remembred and recorded by John Fox , as not unworthy to keep Company with Protestant Martyrs . LXXXV . JOHN WICKLIFF , our Country-man , and in his time Divinity-Professor of Oxford ( Famous for his Learning and Godly Courage in oppugning the Doctrines and Practices of Rome , in the time of Edward the third , and Richard the second , about the year 1370. ) was accused among other things , for maintaining , that all Oaths , which be made for any Contract or Civil Bargain betwixt man and man , are Unlawful . LXXXVI . We will bring in here a Passage out of the Plowman's Tale , as it lyes in GEFFRY CHAUCER's Works , not impertinent to our Purpose ; whose Learning , Honour and Wit was great in the time he lived , which was about 1360. John Wickliff's Contemporary . ' These Wollen make men to Swear , ' against Christ's Commaundment ; ' And Christ's Members all to tear , ' on rood as he were new yrent : ' Such Laws they maken by common Assent , ' each one it throweth as a Ball ; ' Thus the Poor be full shent ; ' but ever Falshood foul it befal . He hath Expressions not less disliking Oaths in his Parson's Tales , where he makes the Parson to say , After those , then cometh Swearing , expresly against the Commandment of God , and our Lord Jesus Christ , who saith by St. Matthew's words , Ne shall ye not Swear in all manner , or on no Account . LXXXVII . WILLIAM SWINDERBY , Priest , and a Zealous Follower of John Wickliff , also lived in the time of Richard the second , as appears by his Appeal to that King , from the Unjust Sentence of the Bishop of Hereford , in which , to this part of the Charge exhibited ( That no man ought to swear for any thing , but simply , without an Oath , to Affirm or Deny ) he answers thus , Whereas Christ's Law forbids Swearing , the Pope's Law justifieth Swearing , and compels men thereunto : Methinks ( saith he ) there is no need to Comfort or Encourage the People in Swearing . LXXXVIII . WALTER BRUTE , also an early Dissenter from the Roman Church , and Intimate of William Swinderby ; being charged , among other things , with saying , That it is not Lawful for Christians , for any Cause to swear by the Creator , neither by the Creature ; thus answer'd for himself , and indeed , it comprehends much of our Belief in this Matter : As concerning Oaths , I believe and obey the Doctrine of Almighty God , and my Master , Jesus Christ , which teacheth , That Christian-men in Affirmation of a Truth should pass the Righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees , the old Testament , or else he excludes them from the Kingdom of God : For Christ sayes , Unless your Righteousness exceed the Righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees , ye cannot enter into the Kingdom of Heaven . And as concerning Oaths , Christ saith , It hath been said by them of old time , thou shalt not Forswear thy self , but shalt perform unto the Lord those things that thou knowest : But I say unto you , Thou shalt not swear at all , neither by Heaven , nor yet by the Earth , &c. but let your Communication be Yea , Yea ; and Nay , Nay ; for , whatsoever shall be more then this , proceedeth of Evil : Therefore , as the Perfection of the ancient Men of the Old Testament was , Not to Forswear themselves ; so the Perfection of Christian Men is , Not to Swear at all , because we are so commanded of Christ , whose Commandments must in no Case be broaken . Thus much of W. Brute . LXXXIX . John Purrey , John Edward , John Becket , John Clements , Richard Herbert and Emmot Willie , with many more in the time of Henry the fourth , through Fears and Hopes deserted their Profession , and revolted ( as John Fox tells us ) from their Faith , which was the Religion then profest of those called Wickliffians or Lollards ( the True , Poor , Persecuted Christians of that time ) And of the Fifteen Articles , by them abjured , this was one ; Item , That neither the * Pope , nor the Prelate , neither any Ordinary can compel any man to Swear by any Creature of God , or by the Bible-Book . XC . WILLIAM THORPE , whom John Fox calls , The Constant and Blessed Servant of God , and good Man and Servant of Christ , &c. refused to swear upon a Bible , when the Arch-Bishop tendered the Oath to him ; for , he thought it Not Lawful to take or give an Oath thereon , Because a Book is nothing else ( sayes he ) but divers Creatures , of which it is made ; and such Swearing is ever Unlawful , as witnesseth Chrysostom plainly , blaming them greatly , that bring out a Book to swear upon ; charging Clarks , that in no wise they constrain any Body to swear well , when that thing is sooth ( or true ) that they swear for . And also , full many Men and Women now say , That it is well done to swear by God , and by our Lady , and by other Saints , to have them in mind ; others say , That they may not swear , when they may otherwise be believed : But since all these Sayings are Excuses , and Sin , methinks , Sir ( saith he ) that this Sense of Chrysostom may be alledged well against all such Swearers . XCI . ELIZABETH YOUNG , who was brought to Examination in the Marian-days , before the Catholick Inquisitors of Heritical Pravity , as they then called themselves , and commanded to Swear , this Language was used to her . Dr. Martin , Thou shalt he racked Inch-meal , thou Trayterly Whore and Heretick ; but thou shalt swear before a Judge before thou go . Eliz. Young , Sir , I understand not what an Oath is , and therefore I will take no such thing upon me . Dr. Martin , She refuseth to swear upon the four Evangelists before a Judge ; for , I my self and Mr. Hussey , have had her before us Four Times , but we cannot bring her to swear . Then said the Bishop , Why wilt thou not swear before a Judge , & c ? Eliz. Young , My Lord , I will not swear , that this Hand is mine . No , said the Bishop ; and why ? Eliz. Young , Christ saith , That whatsoever is more then Yea , Yea ; or Nay , Nay , it cometh of Evil. Then Dr. Cook brought her to a Book , commanding her to lay her Hand thereon . Eliz. Young , No , my Lord , I will Not Swear . And so she persisted , till God delivered her out of their Hands . John Huss , Jerom of Prague , Walter Brute , William Swinderby , William Sawtry , William White , William Thorpe , &c. are recorded by those of other Nations , both High and Low Dutch , to have refused all Swearing ; as well by God , as by Creatures , in any Case , private or publick . Though such as admit of Oaths in some Cases , labour , as John Fox in England , and the Calvinists abroad , to ecclipse and mutilate their Testimony ; as if they were one while only against Book-Swearing , as being a Creature ; another while , only against Swearing in Private Cases ; another while , as J. Fox relates in John Burrell , That it is not lawful to swear , but in Case of Life and Death , &c. But most evident it is , that they were against All Swearing , or Swearing at all ; else , why should they so frequently alledge Chrysostom , who , though he accounted swearing by Creatures a more execrable Sin , then to swear by God ; yet constantly counted Swearing at all , a Sin in Christians , as cleaving to that which Christ had abrogated , being only permitted to the Jews , for the Hardness and Blindness of their Hearts , their Unbelief and Propensity to follow the Course of the Heathens , and swear by their Gods. Let it not be forgotten , that Chrysostom not only inveighs against them that bring forth the Book to swear by , because it is a Creature ; but that he also upbraided them with Impudence and Audaciousness , that dare make use of that Law to administer an Oath by , that so strictly forbids an Oath . Ridiculous it is , to make them deny Swearing only in private Cases , and to be ready to swear in Case of Life and Death : For where is there any Shadow of such a Law ? And how should those Honest Men invent one ? Christ's Law we read Mat. 5. The Doctors , Chrysostom and Jerom's Judgment , whom they had mostly in their Mouths , we have repeated here at large , in which is not the least Restriction . These Good Men then must needs be understood to take the Law of Christ either to have forbidden Swearing in any Case , and then not to swear in Case of Life ; or not to forbid Swearing at all , and then they not only might swear to save their Lives , but Liberties and Estates , and ought so to do . But we hope there can be no room left for this Objection . XCII . The LOLLARDS of Kille in Scotland were against all Swearing , as both Spotswood in his Chronicle doth relate , and the Book called , The History of the Reformation of the Kirk of Scotland . XCIII . MICHAEL SADLER ( an Eminent Man , call'd a Lord ) was Cruelly Tortur'd and put to death by some Papists under the Emperor of Germany , whose Brethren were also Executed with the Sword , and his Wife and Sisters Drowned , Ann. 1527. One Article alledged against him was , that he had said , That men should not Swear to , or before the Magistrate . XCIV . The CHRISTIAN-PROTESTANTS in the Valley of Piedmont , who were Cruelly Tortured to Death by the Papists , about Ann. 1655. One Article alledged against them was , That they believed it was not lawful to Swear any thing , be it True or False . XCV . GERARD SAGARELD of Parma , and his Followers , Denyed all Oaths and Vows . So did several in Germany , mention'd by B. Usher , in his Book De Successione : In Germany , Jury and Swearing is well excluded , and need not much to be required . XCVI . ERASMUS , Now ye shall hear another thing . Commandment was given unto your Elders , none otherwise ; but if they had made an Oath , they should perform it , and not be Forsworn ; for now they are bound to God , and not to man only : Wherefore among the Jews only Perjury is punishable ; but he that deceives his Neighbour without any Oath made , he goes unpunished ; but yet the Law of the Gospel condemneth him ; the which , that ye may be the more remote from Perjury , doth utterly condemn all manner of Oaths ; that it is not lawful to Swear , neither by God , nor by those things which seem to the Common Sort to be things of less Religion , that is , Neither by Heaven , because it is the Seat of God ; nor by the Earth , because it is his Foot-stool ; nor by Jerusalem , because it is the City of the Great King , that is to say , of him that hath made all things : Neither as the Heathen swear , by the Head of another Man , whereof thou hast no Authority ; but it is consecrate to God , that hath made all things as he would ; for thou canst not make one White Hair Black , nor the contrary : And because all things are consecrate to God , the Maker , thou oughtest to be fearful to swear by any thing . And what needeth any Oath among them , where no man , because of their Simplicity , can distrust ; nor no man can desire to deceive , though they might do it ? Such is their Sincerity and Perfectness , specially in those things of the which they declare themselves to be Despisers . Therefore among you , plain and simple Speech ought to be more holy and more sure then the devout and solemn Oath among the Jews : For , among you , whose Hearts and Mouths ought to agree , there is no other use of Speech , but to express your Minds each to other . In your Bargains ye need no Oath , ye need no Execration , or Cursing , or such like , to bind the Promiser , or to assure him to whom the Promise is made : Two Words be sufficient , Nay and Yea , whereby thou denyest that which thou dost not promise , and whereby thou dost perform that which thou didst promise by plain Word , that thou wouldst do : For , there is no man less bound by his simple and bare Word , then the Jew Swearing by all holy Things ; and he whom thou makest thy Promise unto , doth trust thee as much as if thou hadst made a solemn Oath . If there be any more besides these , it must needs come of Evil and Sin : For , he that sweareth , either be thinketh Evil of him to whom he sweareth , ; or else , he that requireth the Oath , doth distrust : But none of these ought to be in you , whom I would have perfect in all Points . Therefore , when I utterly forbid Swearing , I do not abolish the Law which doth prohibit Perjury ; but I make the Law more full , and I with-draw men further from that , which the Law doth punish . Let your Mind be pure and plain , and let your Heart and your Mouth go both together : Let no man with feign'd words deceive his Neighbour . But especially , my Brethren , Swear Not , lest by little and little you accustom your selves to Forswear . Among Jews and Heathens , for Fidelity's sake , there is an Oath put ; But among Christians , which ought neither to distrust any man , nor to deceive , it is a Vain Thing to Swear . Whosoever is accustomed to Swear , is Cousen-german to the Peril of Forswearing . Be you afraid , not only to Swear by God in humane Affairs , and in light Matters , but also abstain from all kind of Swearing , that you Swear neither by Heaven , neither by Earth , or any other thing , that the Common People esteem for Holy and Religious . Whosoever dare be bold to Lye without Swearing , he dare do the same also when he Sweareth , if he list . To be brief : He that is a good man , will believe a man without Swear●ng ; and he that is naught , will not trust a man though he Swear : But among you that are furnished with Evangelical Plainness , there is neither place to distrust , nor to imagine Deceit ; But let your Plain Communication be regarded for no less True and Stedfast , then any manner of Oath of the Jews or Pagans , how holy soever it be . As often as you confirm any thing , confirm it with all your Heart ; and perform indeed the thing that you speak : As oft as you deny any thing , deny it with your whole Heart ; neither let any thing else be in your Heart then your Mouth speaketh , that there be no Counterfeiting in you , seeing you are Disciples of the Truth . Thus far , we hope , is put altogether out of Question , Whether many Learned and Christian Men have not flatly denyed the Vse of Oaths to True Christians : And though we need not the Contribution that is afforded us by several School and other Roman Doctors , yet to evidence a kind of Succession , and Universality of Testimony to this Doctrine , we think it not improper to mention some of them . The Judgment of Shoolmen and others , in this Point . XCVII . T. AQUINAS , Non j●rare omnino , &c. Not to swear at all , &c. The Lord had taught before , Wrong is not to be done to our Neighbour , as in forbidding Anger with Murder , Lust , Adultery , putting away of one's Wife ; and now he teacheth consequently , that we must abstain from the wronging of God , when he doth not forbid only Forswearing , as Evil , but also an Oath , as the Occasion of Evil , from whence he saith , hear thou again , For it was said of old time , Thou shalt not forswear thy self : and lest that they might make to themselves the Creatures Gods , he commandeth , to render the Oaths to God , and not to swear by the Creatures ; from whence it follows , Render to God , &c. that is , If one shall happen to swear by the Creator , not by the Creature , whence he saith in Deuteronomy , Thou shalt fear the Lord thy God , and by his Name shalt swear ; and this was allowed by the Law , as to Children , that as they did offer Sacrifice to Idols , they should not offer them to Idols ; so they were permitted to swear by God , not that they might do this rightly , but that it might be better to give this to God , them to Devils . Chrysostom upon Matthew , For no man sweareth frequently that sometimes may not forswear ; as he that makes it a Custom to speak many things , sometimes he speaks unfit things . Augustine against Fauslus , The Lord was more willing that we not Swearing might come short of the Truth , then Swearing the Truth , to come nearer to Perjury : Whence it follows , I say unto you , Swear not at all . Augustine on the Words of the Lord in the Mountain , in which he confirms the Righteousness of the Pharisees , which is , Not to Forswear , For be cannot Forswear , that doth not Swear . XCVIII . CAJETAN , Again , Ye have heard ] He perfects another Precept of the Old Law concerning Perjury ( because it was said to them of old time , Thou shalt not Forswear ) Exod. 20. Thou shalt not take the Name of thy God in vain : And Levit. 19. Thou shalt not Forswear in the Name of the Lord ; but shalt render to the Lord thy Oaths . The first part of this Precept ( namely , Thou shalt not Forswear ) is negative , forbidding Evil in its kind ; for Perjury is Evil of it self , therefore by no Reason it can be exc●sed . But the second part ( namely , Thou shalt render to the Lord thy Oaths ) is affirmative , and doth not signifie to fulfil the Oaths which thou hast promised ( as it appears ) and thereupon nothing follows of fulfilling of Promises ) but it signifies , that the Oaths to God are to be rendred ; that is , that Swearing must be by the Lord , not by the Creatures : For these words are not in the Law , but the Sense of them is , Deut. 6. Thou shalt swear by the Name of the Lord thy God : Where Swearing is not commanded , but is but regulated , that it should be by the Name of God , and not by the Name of the Creatures : For , the Law commandeth , that this Act of Religion , which is , to swear , should be exhibited to God , and to no Creatures or Idols whatsoever . But I say unto you ] He perfecteth both the Precepts , adjoyning two Precepts ; the one negative , the other affirmative ( Not to Swear at all ) Lo a negative Precept , wherein two things are contained , that is , Not to Swear , and Not at all ; he forbids us to Swear at all , by all means , as well in expressing God , as not in expressing God ; suppose by Heaven and Earth , and by the rest of the Creatures : And in this he perfects the Precept concerning not Forswearing , not only by taking away an Oath , but the Occasion of Forswearing ; for , 't is impossible to incur Forswearing without an Oath : and also , the Precept of performing the Oath to God , by taking away the Care of Performing ; for where nothing is sworn , there is no need of any Care of performing the Oath to God. CV . ALPHONSUS de Avendano , It 's to be noted out of Cajetan , that in this the Lord perfected the Command of not Forswearing , by taking away not only Forswearing , but the Occasion of not Forswearing ; because , without an Oath it is impossible to incur Perjury . An Oath was not necessary by the first Intention of Nature ; for if men had continued in the Truth , they had not lyed ; and because Christ came , that he might bring back men to this first Innocency , an Oath was not necessary , supposing that men ought to return unto it , then to men that live according to the Simplicity of the Gospel , an Oath is not necessary , and therefore not Good. Reasons for avoiding Caths , from the same Author . 1 st , Lest by Swearing they fall into Perjury , for which Cause Swearing is of an ill Report amongst the Saints , as in Ambrose , Psalm 18. 2 dly , For Reverence of the Name of God. 3 dly , For the mutual Confidence which one Christian should have of another , which ought to be so great , that every one should be sure , and not possible to be deceived in the least thing , although he should speak in a single Assertion ; and for the Authority of the Saints , which do seem to forbid all Oaths to Christians , and that the Truth of the Gospel receives no Oath , as good and desirable of it self ; seeing every one is of Evil. Lastly , Out of Cajetan , The Lord perfecteth this Precept of not Forswearing , by taking away not only Perjury , but the Occasion of it , and taking away the Care : For , where there is no Swearing , there is no need of Care of Rendering . Oh! how Sincere and True would the Lord make his Christians , that all Affirmations should be included in Three Letters only , all Denyals in other Three , that the Truth should be so familiar to us , as to be included in the Compendium of Three Letters ? C. FRANCISCUS de MENDOCA , Olysiponensis , Dr. Theol. in Eburens . Academia , Sacr. lit . Interpres , in 4. lib. Reg. Tom. 3. Speak , saith he , of me , &c. In the Hebrew it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. testifie , from the verb 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , which not only sig●ifieth to speak but also to bear Testimony , as it is to be seen Ex. 〈◊〉 . n. 14. Deut. 19. n. 15. Job 16. n. 9. et passi● alib● , and many other places ▪ as if there were no Difference with the Hebrews of speaking and testifying , nor without Cause ; for there ought to be so much Veracity of Good Men , that their Simple Speech may be accounted sworn , and their private Conference be accounted a publick Testimony , which was to be accounted the Fidelity of Cato , who was believed in a Court-Case even Unsworn ; which also S. Jerome , in his Epistle to Celantia , inculcates ; Let there be , saith he , so much Love of Truth in thee , that whatsoever thou sayest , thou mayst think to be sworn . The same Jerome to that of Mat. 5. Swear not , &c. The Gospel-Truth , saith he , doth not receive an Oath , sith every Faithful Speech is for an Oath . To which Opinion is agreeable the Doctrine of Philo Alex. in his Book of the Decalogue , It will be most profitable , saith he , and most agreeable to the rational Nature , to abstain Altogether from Swearing ; and be so accustom'd to Truth , that one's single Word may have the Force of an Oath . The like relateth Josephus , in the second Book of the Jewish War , cap. 7. De his Esseni , most sincere Worshippers of Truth ( vericultoribus . ) The Hebrew Elders also , when they would make their Innocency about the man kill'd by an Uncertain Author , testified with an Oath , as the Rabbins , Solomon and Moses in Lyran. affirm , Deut. 21. Nevertheless , they are brought in by the Scripture , asseverating it only with simple Speech ; And they shall say , saith he , Our Hands have not shed this Blood , nor our Eyes seen it . Because the simple and Naked Speech of a Wise Man , is equivalent to an Oath ; which St. Bernard vehemently commendeth in Comite Theobaldo , in Epist . 38. to the same , And indeed , saith he , in other Princes , if at any time we take a Word of Lightness or Falseness , we account it neither new nor wonderful : But with Count Theobald , we do not at all patiently hear Yea & Nay , to whom , as it is said , Simply to speak , is to Swear ; and a light Lye is accounted a heavy Perjury ; for among very many Ensigns of Virtue , which do very much ennoble your Dignity , and make your Name Renowned and Famous throughout the World , the Constancy of Truth is especially praised in you . 3. Certainly God himself hath ( tantundem ) so much to speak nakedly , and to swear by himself holily : For that he promised with an Oath an Off-spring to David , which should sit on his Throne , is read no where in the Scripture ; And yet Abner , 2 King. 3. n. 9. acknowledges an Off-spring sworn to David , The Lord do so to Abner , saith he , and add these things to him , unless as the Lord hath sworn to David , so I do with him . And in Psalm 88. God himself saith , Once have I sworn in my Holiness , if I Lye to David , &c. Also the Land of Canaan is no where found , in the holy Scriptures promised to the ancient Fathers with an Oath ; but God promised it simply to Abraham , Gen. 12 , 13 , & 17. to Isaac , Gen. 26. to Jacob , Gen. 28. Yet Moses , in Deut. 1. Possess , saith he , the Land , for which the Lord sware to your Fathers . Philo Alex. in the Book of Abraham , at the end looses the Knot notably ; That therefore the simple Promise of God in those places is called an Oath , because it hath the Force of an Oath . CI. JACOBUS FABER , It is the part of a Spiritual Man , not only Not to Swear in a Vain Thing , but also not in any Serious thing ; for , you which are such , are true : Unto true men it 's sufficient that a true man gain Belief , if he say , that the Lord hath commanded Yea , Yea , in Affirming ; Nay , Nay , in Denying : But if with incredulous and Evil men a Speech also be had concerning a serious and necessary Matter , why shall one Swear for their Badness , that he may gain Belief with them ? Who ever spake more seriously then our Saviour ? Who more necessary things ? Yet he never used other Speech then that , Verely , verely , I say unto you , or some other such like , which was a true Form or Manner to them , that swore not . Therefore that now some Swear , to gain Belief concerning some profitable and necessary things , which they think is to be given rather to the Oath then to the Person : Perhaps also there is a Danger when an Oath is required in Judgment , lest he that exacteth it , sin ; For if it be manifest , that he that is called into Judgment be verely good and true , it is enough to hear of him Yea or Nay ; but if that be not evident , or that it be evident , that he is bad , perhaps that 's required of him which ought not to be required . What then ? It is lawful to Adjure : For the Lord made Answer to an Adjuration , but he did not Swear ; and Adjurations are found in the New Law : But if any one being Adjured of another , speak the Truth , by answearing Yea or Nay , or by declaring the thing requir'd , neither the one nor the other offendeth ; but if he speak a Falsity , he offends , and incurs the Offence of a False Testimony , but perchance he sinneth less then if by Swearing he had also fallen into the Guilt of Perjury : For , as he that ( being adjured ) answereth in Truth , doth not Swear ; so he that answereth in Falsness , doth not Forswear , but he is a False Witness : but he also who hath adjured , is altogether guitless ; for , there is no doubt but he hath required that which was lawful to require . And although it s not my Purpose to contradict the Ordinances of Judgments , yet I may think this to be more Christian , both N●t to Swear at all , neither to Compel to Swear , to be more Spiritual : But yet , if the Badness of men would permit it , although you would have this Sentence of the Lord concerning not Swearing , to be applyed to the Believers common and daily Custom of speaking ( for he speaks to his Disciples ) which is very true , especially if the old Law , which the Lord declares , Thou shalt not Forswear , but shalt render to the Lord thine Oaths , was given concerning common and daily Speech ; but afterwards the Lord amendeth another thing , which was written in the Old Law , that the Law might be perfect , and that he might shew how he hath fulfilled it ; and it may be fulfilled of others , as Matthew shews . CII . SUAREZ : He affirmeth , Christ did not Swear , because that which he could not lawfully do , he could not simply do ; but he could not lawfully swear , therefore he could not at all : But that he never swore , is proved , because that he himself commanded or counselled , Not to swear at all ; but simply to speak , Yea , it is ; Nay , it is not , &c. therefore ought to go before the Example . It is spoaken of him only sometimes that he said Amen , or Truly or Verily , which we have before shewed to be no Particle of Swearing . It 's not only forbidden in the New , but also in the Old Testaments , Not to Swear , as Hos . 4. Zach. 5. quoteth Tertullian , lib. de Idololat . cap. 11. saying , I am silent about Perjury , seeing that indeed it is not lawful to Swear . And those very words of Christ , Swear not at all , signifie this ( seeing he subjoyns , Neither by Heaven , &c. ) as if he had said , not only greater Oaths , but also these , which seem less , you are to take heed of , and it is apparent from the Reason which he adjoyns , saying , Neither by Heaven : If therefore Christ forbiddeth to swear by Heaven , because God dwells therein , much more he forbiddeth to swear by God , &c. Now he forbiddeth all manner of Swearing by the Creatures , and every Oath by God himself , as Greg. Nyssen rightly argues , and Christ himself hath plainly so declared , Mat. 23. Lastly , The following Words of Christ are opposit , Let your Word be Yea and Nay ; for , by them he declareth , that he before forbad the Addition of any Oath . 2 dly , Jerome answers , Swearing was permitted to the Jews , as to Children ; but Evangelical Verity receives not Swearing , seeing every Faithful Word is for an Oath . The same Doctrine and Exposition doth Chrysostom follow . Theophylact , after Christ , It is an Evil to Swear , as to be Circumcised , and in brief , whatsoever is Jewish . Beda , also Castro and Druthmarus confess , and Bernard himself denyes not , that it is the Counsel of Christ , not to Swear . And Precepts are not contray to Counsels . Libr. 1. cap. 14. p. 282. Whether an Oath be an elicit Act of Religious Virtue ? There may be a Reason of Doubting , because every Act of Religion is Principally intended for the Worship of God : But an Oath is not made primarily , and of it self ( per se ) for the Worship of God ; but for confirming , &c. as Heb. 6. From whence it seems plainly to follow , That an Oath is not an Act of Religion . It may be declared by Reason ; because , 1 st , It is impossible that man can bring God for a Witness , although he would never so fain : Therefore the Name of God is taken in vain , as often as it is taken to swear ; Therefore it is Evil in it self ( per se . ) 2 dly , Grant this were possible , to bring God for a Witness ; it seems disorderly to bring the Person of God to confirm men's Businesses , Covenants , or Words , because it is disorderly to order things of an higher Order to those that are inferiour : Much more is it disorderly , to mix the sacred Authority of God to the prophane ( or common ) Words , and Businesses of Men. 3 dly , Though-in some Case an Oath might be used without Inconvenience , yet it is so exposed to Dangers , that it can scarce be done without Crime : But in the Law of Grace ; because of the Perfection of it , not only Sins are to be forbid , but also those things which do morally and nearest entangle into Sin : For he that loveth Danger , shall perish in it . He quotes Clemens Romanus , lib. 6. Constitut . Apost . as before ; Our Master commanded , that we should not Swear , no , not by the true God ; that our Word should be counted more firm and credible then an Oath it self . He quotes also Greg. Nazianzen , as before , upon these words , But I say unto you , &c. ] He forbiddeth all manner of Swearing by the Creatures , even with Respect to God : Hence it follows from the forcibler , as I said , that he forbad all Swearing by God himself , as Gregory Nazianzen rightly argues , as before , on Cant. Homil. 18. And Christ himself plainly so declared , Mat. 23. He that Sweareth by Heaven , Sweareth by the Throne of God , &c. Lastly , The words withstand , which Christ subjoyns , Let your Word be , &c. ] For , by them he declares , that he had before forbidden the adding of any Oath : Therefore Jerome answered , That Oaths , &c. were permitted to the Jews , as to Children . He uses many other Arguments , and quotes many Authors , as may be seen at large in his Book concerning Swearing . CIII . JO. MAJOR HADINGTONIANI , on Mat. 5. Not to Swear at all : That Precept was given to the Disciples ( the Basis ) of the first Church . CIV . JO AC . CAMER . and P. LOSELER VILLERIUS's Marginal Note upon Mat. 5.37 . Whatsoever you vouch , vouch it barely ; and whatsoever you deny , deny it barely , without any more words . CV . Bible , imprinted An. 1559. in Quarto . What is more is of Evil ] Marginal Note , From an evil Conscience , or from the Devil . CVI. MARLORAT on Mat. 5. saith , Some men , not bad , hold against Swearing . Maldonat on Mat. 5. reckons up several against Swearing . CVII . PETER CHARRON , Doctor of Law in Paris , in his Book of Wisdom , chap. 37. An Oath , what is it , but a Symptom and shameful Mark of Distrust , Infidelity , Ignorance , Humane Infirmity , both in him that Requires it , that Gives it , that Ordains it ( alluding to Christ's Words , saith he ) Quod amplius est a malo ; What is more , is from the Devil . CVIII . BEZA , on James 5.12 . That which you have to say or affirm , speak or affirm it simply , and without an Oath ; and that you have to deny , deny it simply and flatly . CIX . Folio Bible , printed Ann. 1578. Marginal Note on Mat. 5.34 . Swear not at all , Let Simplicity and Truth be your Words , and then you shall not be so light , and ready to Swear . CX . LODOVICUS SOTO Major , In the Gospel , this Particle ( Amen ) is often used by Christ our Lord , confirming his Words by it , as Hierem also noteth ; yet it 's not to be thought ( that none be deceived ) that Christ our Lord swore , or would have to Swear , as often as he useth this Word or Form of Confirming ; but rather so to have been willing , more to Confirm , and Perswade , and Commend those Things which he taught , and especially , by Reiterating or Repeating this Word , as he often useth ; for neither in this doubling of the Word , for nought that Christ our Lord sometimes useth it in the Gospel , but rather it hath a great Emphasis & Encrease , that is , great Moment and Weight to perswade and gain Belief , as Augustine rightly teacheth and explaineth in his 41. Tract upon the Gospel of John , expounding those Words of Christ , saying , Amen , or verely , verely , I say to you , He that doth Sin , is the Servant of Sin : although therefore that it be not a Swearing , yet it is a certain greater Confirmation and Asseveration of those Things which are spoaken ; yet nevertheless it is not Swearing ; for otherwise , is it likely that Christ the Lord , who himself d●horts others from Swearing at all , for Danger of Forswearing , should himself Swear so often ? for he not only forbad his to Swear , Mat. 5. but also at the same Time , and that very wholsomly that they should only use in their Speech a simple Affirmation and Denyal , without any Oath , saying , Swear NOT at all , &c. for this much more becomes the Simplicity , Sincerity , Piety and Modesty of Christians ; for nothing is more Simple , Brief and Effectual to perswade ( the Badness and Naughtiness of Men being removed ) then a single Affirmation or Denyal , although there were no Danger of Perjury . In this Sense in a Manner , do mostly all the graver Authors interpret that Place of the Gospel , or Command of Christ , of Not Swearing at all ; but especially Augustine lib. 4. of the Lord's Words in the Mount , C●p. 30. and 31. and in his Book de Mendacio , cap 15. and Epist . 154. to Publicola , and often else-where ; For which Interpretation or Understanding votes also Philo Judaeus in his Book of the Decalogue , Tom. 2. p. 129. where treating of an Oath , he thus congruently writeth ; Men sin in this Respect many and divers Wayes , therefore it will be most profitable and most agreeable to the Reasonable Nature , to abstain ALTOGETHER from Swearing , and so to accustom to Truth , that simple Sp●ech may have the Force of an Oath , &c. Which Things Philo in the same Place pursues to the same Sense , very congruently in the Gospel , that which also he confirms in his Book of Special Laws , Tom. 2. pag. 137. And afterwards , If therefore , as I said before , Christ the Lord for the Danger of Perjury , and also for the Reverence or Religion of an Oath , commands his NOT to Swear at all , though otherwise , it be true which they affirm ; If I say , there be so much Reverence of an Oath , how great is the Perfection ? It is not likely nor agreeable to Reason , that the Lord Christ , the Patern of true and solid Virtue , every Action of whom is our Instruction , did Swear so often , that is , should swear as often as he used this Form , Verely , verely , I say unto you , &c. For how can every moral Action of his , or in his Conversation , be our Instruction or Example , if he so frequently and every where seems to do that , which he so vehemently and earnestly commanded his , even his chosen Disciples , that is , his Apostles , that they should not do it at all ? Yet Augustine in his Book of the Apostles Words , Ser. 30. seems by his Authority to create some Scruple and Ado for us , inasmuch as he seems to censure and say , That it is a kind of Perjury when any wittingly & willingly ( that is , with certain Reason and Will , or of set Purpose ) useth this Word VERELY , to confirm any Thing : Yet if we diligently mark and weigh the Words of St. Augustine there , he intends no other then what we intend , acknowledge and confess , and is necessarily to be confessed , namely , that he which from a false Opinion and Perswasion , and an Erroneous Conscience , as Divines call it , thinketh and believeth that he Sweareth in very Deed in using this Word , as if this Word were an Adverb of Swearing , that sometimes he happens in a Manner to Forswear , if that which he affirms in this Manner be false ; yet this is accidentary and adventitious , namely , by the Intention of him that sweareth of his own Will , or rather Error or Ignorance , and not by the Force and Propriety of the Word Amen or Ve●ely , seeing , as we have said even now , that it is not a Word or Note of Swearing , but rather of confirming , as we confess : and the same St Augustine teacheth else-where , but especially in Tract 41. on the Gospel of John , on those Words of Christ the Lord , Verely , verely , &c. where Augustine moderating his Words , saith thus , Verely , verely , is , if we may so say , in a certain Manner , a Sw●aring of Christ . Now these Words of Augustine are to be weighed ; he dealeth not simply , but with an Additament and Caution . Verely , verely , to be ( if it be lawful to say it ) after a Manner a Swearing of Christ ; for so he declares plain enough , that Verely , verely , is not properly ●wearing , or a Note of Swearing , but only improperly , and after a certain Manner , viz. So far forth as Christ the Lord doth familiarly use this Word as Swearing , although in very Deed , and properly it be not an Adverb of Swearing , but rather affirming and asserting simply and in good Faith , to gain a better Perswasion of the Matter or Doctrine ; for Christ never seems to have Sworn , if we will ●peak truly and properly of Swearing , but alwayes us'd a simple Speech though sometimes by am●sicationem ; he hath used this , even repeated , I say , for the ●reater Perswasion of his Heavenly Doctrine , that by this ●eans he might give his an Example of Not Swearing rashly and every where , as we have already said , to whom he plainly commanded , saying , Swear not at all , &c. but , &c. so great is the Religion of Swearing , and the Danger of Forswearing . The Approbation and Commendation of the Doctors of Paris . We have carefully read these Commentaries on the Epistles of St Paul , and Timothy , and Titus , wherein the most Learned Author , according to the great Learning wherein he excells , largely and elegantly opens the more hidden Senses of the Apostles ; and we have thought them worthy to be printed for publick Profit , Act Par. 16. Feb. 1610. F. Coeff . F.J. Tourn , &c. CXI . LODOVICUS PIUS Emperor , who in his Prologue saith , That from his Youth , by Christ's Inspiration , he had the Desire of the Worship of God , Capitul . Addit . 4. Tit. 96. Of not Swearing : That every one beware of Swearing ; because Forswearers as also Adulterers , shall not inherit the Kingdom of God. CXII . King LUITPRANDUS ; The Law of the Lumbards , Tit. 28. Law 2. If he that enquires concerning Theft , believe not the Witnesses , the Witnesses may confirm it with an Oath , except they be such Persons as the King or Judge may trust without an Oath . CXIII . The Emperor LOTHARIUS , Of the Law of the Lumbards , Tit. 3. Law 10. Of those that enforce Payment of Tythes , we will not have them to be constrain'd with an OATH , for Fear of Forswearing . CXIV . Of the Law of the VISOGOTHS , L. 2. Tit. 1. Law 23. which was ancient : Let none come easily to an Oath : For the true Search of Justice rather commendeth this , that the Scriptures in all things may intercur , and the Necessity of Swearing may altogether suspend it self . Thus much against Swearing from several Roman Doctors and others . We shall in the next Place produce the Judgment of those Men , who run not so high in their Censure of Oaths , as the Persons that we have hitherto cited , but that believe it is not unlawful in any Case to take an Oath , and from them we doubt not to make appear , that it is best Not to swear at all ; so far they from pleading for Swearing , or punish those that conscientiously refuse it . CXV . WILLIAM TINDAL saith , Our Dealing ought to be so substantial , that our Words might be believed without an Oath : Our Words are the Signs of the Truth of our Hearts , in which there ought to be pure & single Love toward thy Brother . Again he sayes , Swearing can only be allowed in Charity , where Yea and Nay have lost Credance ; however , that no Judge or other ought in any Case to compel any Man to swear against his Will. Peter Martyr , who deserves well of the English Protestants , confesseth , That Christians ought to live so Charitably and Uprightly , as not to need an Oath , and that they may not be called upon to Swear . Again , Let us so live that there may be no need for us to Swear , either by God , or any other Thing at all ; and this ( sayes he ) is that same AT ALL , which Christ spoak of . N. Zegerus upon Mat. 5.34 . tells us , That the most Ancient Writers from thence concluded all Oaths forbidden , and that the bare Word of Christians ought to be more Sacred and Firm then the most Religious Oaths of the Jews . CXVI . H. GROTIUS , a great & Learned Man , excludes all Oaths , not only such as are used in common Conversation ; but such as relate to Trade or pecuniary Matters ; allowing some oth●rs for avoiding Infamy , for preserving a Friend , & for a great Service to their Country , as not morally necessary , and by Precept , but only by Consequence and Remedy ; concluding that it is best to live so , as not to need an Oath : And so both many of those Oaths imposed upon us , are laid aside by him ; and also he gives many Cautions shewing that it is best not to Swear at all , if it may possibly be avoided : But in Answer to his Interpretation ; All Oaths are forbid that are performable to the Lord ▪ Now unles the vain inconsiderate , Oaths , such as are used in common Traffique are only those that are to be perform'd to the Lord , Solemn Oaths , such as the Law allow'd , are also prohibited . Besides , the Yea and Nay of a true Christian is as capable of all those good Services as an Oath , if the Sanctity of his Faith and Profession be allowed : And if any Prejudices come to a Man's Friend , Country or Self , because his Yea and Nay is rejected , it will never lye at his Door , who offers all Christ permits him , and his Conscience will dispense with ; but on the Distruster's Side , especially , when he that in Conscience can't Swear , offers as large CAUTION as he that SWEARS , and is willing to undergo Equal Punishment , in Case of Vntruth , that the other by Law sustains for Perjury . And those that will have it to relate to Rash , and not Judicial Oaths , quite cross the Text ; for Christ prohibits not only vain and superfluous Oaths , as now called , such as were alwayes unlawful , even under the Law ; but such as were allowed in the Times of the Law , rendring them also by Evangelical Verity under the Gospel , Vain , superfluous and Vnlawful : For well said Bp. Sanderson , No Need to forbid by a new Command Things that of themselves were alwayes unlawful . Otherwise , we must read Christ's Words thus , Ye have heard by them of Old Time , thou shalt not forswear thy self , but shalt perform unto the Lord thine Oaths ; but I say unto you , Swear not at all , except before a Judge ; as if Swearing before a Judge under the Law , were not an Oath performable to the Lord ; and such it self the Place most expresly forbids ; or thus , Of Old it was said , thou shalt not forswear thy self , but let your Yea be Yea , and your Nay , Nay , th● is , perform to God thine Oaths in Truth and Righteousness : But I ( who say more then was said of Old ) say unto you , Swear not at all , but perform thine Oaths to God in Truth and Righteousness ; The Inconherence of which must needs be obvious to every considerate Person ; yet it is the only Reading that ●an be left upon those Interpretations . We say , that what God dispensed with under the Law , he resolved to remove under the Gospel , and to wind up Things to a higher Pitch of Truth & Righteousness : from Adultery in the Act , to Adultery in the Thought ; from Revenge , to Sufferance ; from True Swearing , to NO Swearing at all , whereby all Abuse of Oaths and Perjury come to be removed with the Oaths themselves , by working out of Man's Heart that Fraud and Falshood that brought them in , and implanting Evangelical Verity in room thereof , which speaketh the Truth , the whole Truth , and nothing but the Truth to his Neighbour , and makes a like Matter of Conscience to t●ll a Lye , as to Forswear . And it is known to Almighty God , and we most heartily desire it may be known and belived by you , that we have no other End nor Inducement to this so general Refusal we are found in throughout the Nation . CXVII . Bp. USHER is so tender in this Point , that set aside his Vindication of the Waldenses , in his Sum of Christian - Religion , he makes it necessary to the taking of an Oath , that it be considered , First , If the Party we deal with ( really ) doubt of the Thing we affirm or deny , thereby making Distrust the Cause of Swearing , and implying , that not Custom , but real Diffidenc● should only continue Swearing ; consequently , not to continue where Distrust is done away . Secondly , It is to be weighed if the Party's Doubt whereof we speak , be Weighty , and Worthy of an Oath , which we fear , is seldom thought upon ; Custom prevailing even to Triffles , as well as most excessive vain Swearing in Common Conversation . Thirdly , If the Question be Weighty , w●e●her ( saith the Bishop ) the Doubt may be ended with Truly or Verely ; or doubting , it Verely ▪ Verely , as Christ did for you , by his Example we ought to forbear an Oath ? Mat. 5.37 . Wherefore should it not , especially among Christians . Fourthly , Whether there be not yet any other fit Means to try out the Matter before we come to an Oath . This is our Case ; and we make it our Sober Request , that it would please you to consider this Particular ; for doubtless , an Expedient may very easily be found , without bringing us under the Bondage of an Oath . CXVIII . JER . TAYLER , Chaplain in Ordinary to K. Charles I. and late Bishop of Doun and Conner , in his Book call'd ' 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , A Course of Sermons , London printed 1673. Serm. Of Christian Simplicity , fol. 228. Thus , Our blessed Lord would not have his Disciples to Swear at all ( not in publick Judicature ) if the Necessity of the World would permit him to be obey'd . If Christians will live according to the Religion , the WORD of a Christian were a sufficient Instrument to give Testimony , and to make Promises , and to secure a Faith ; and upon that Supposition , Oaths were useless , and therefore forbidden ; because there would be no Necessity to invoke God's Name in Promises or Affirmations , if men were INDEED Christians ; and therefore in that Case would be a Taking in vain : But because MANY are not ; and they that are in NAME , oftentimes are in nothing els , it became necessary that Men should Swear in Judgment and in publick Courts . But consider who it was that invented and made the Necessity of Oaths , of Bonds , of Securities , & all the Artifices of Human Diffidence and Dishonesty : These Things were indeed found out by Men , but the Necessity , of these was from him that is the Father of all Lyes ; from him that hath made many fair Promises , but never kept any ; or if he did , it was to do a bigger MISCHIEF , to slatter the more ; For so does the DEVIL . See Jews Antiquities , Chap. 12 Pag. 52. Concerning the Pythaegoreans , the Esseni , and concerning the Just Man at Athens , which they would not have to swear ; And what the Scholiast on Aristophanes , Lib. 12. p. 286. saith of Rhadamanthus . CXIX . Lastly , Bp. CAUDEN in his Discourse for Solemn Swearing , sayes thus much against it . 1. That Dissimulations , Frauds , Jealousies , &c. gave Rise to Oaths . 2. That The Ancient Christians and Fathers , that they might not be short of the Esseni , who WOULD NOT TAKE AN OATH , REFUSED TO SWEAR , saying to the Heathen , Christianus sum , I am a Christian ; to each other , Yea , yea ; Nay , nay ; thereby keeping up the Sanctity and Credit of their Profession . 3. That as Christians , truly such , we should possibly need no Swearing ; for an Oath is not ( sayes he ) Moral or Preceptive , but an Expedient or Remedy only against Falseness . Lastly , That neither a true Christian and good Man need to be Compelled to Swear , in Order to the Awing him into Truth-telling — Nor is ill Mens Swearing of much Credit ; with more to that Purpose : What Need then is there of either's Swearing ? The Substance of all which is this ; Oaths rise with Fraud ; Mens growing False and Jealous , Swearing or Awing by Oaths into True Evidence , became an Expedient ; and during this imbecil and imperfect State of Mankind , Almighty God , that hath been ever wont to stoop to Man's Weakness , condescended to yield the Jews that Custom , provided that they refrain'd from Common and Idolatrous Oaths ; and when they were called to Swear , they did it by the Name of the True God ▪ thereby manifesting their Acknowledgment of him ; but Christ , who is the Restorer of Breaches , the Builder of waste Places , the Bringer back of the Captivity of his People ( where Oaths were first wanted and learned ) and the Setter up of the Kingdom of God ( which stands in Righteousness ) redeems into Truth-speaking which fulfils the Law by taking away the Occasion of an Oath ; and such as are the true , humble and faithful Followers of this worthy Leader , need no Oath to compel them into Truth , to whom Truth is Natural , being freed by it , Joh. 8.32 . from Fraud & Falseness , and consequently from Swearing , which took Occasion by it to enter the World. Now we profess our selves in the Fear of Almighty God to be such as have thus learned Christ Jesus , and for the Reverence and Holy Love we bear to his Righteous Commandment we can't take an Oath in any Case . Object . 'T is True , and you say well , Oaths only serve till Truth-speaking comes , and you say , it is come to you ; But how shall we know that ? Answ . We intreat you to try us : No Man can be justly condemn'd before he be guilty ; nor reputed guilty in the Sight of men , till discover'd , You will have as easie a Way to catch us at Lying , as others at Forswearing ; and if you find us such , inflict the same Punishment for Our Lye , which is enacted for their Perjury . Be pleased to consider : I. The Rise of OATHS . II The Prohibition of CHRIST . III. The Judgment of so many good HEATHENS . IV. The Belief & Practice of so many primitive CHRISTIANS , Celeb●ious FATHERS , Godly MARTYRS , and Learned PROTESTANTS . V. The Caution they use who in any Sense allow of an Oath . VI. That it is matter of Faith ; and What is not of Faith , is Sin : And that we cannot alter our Minds without Conviction , unless we should turn Hypocrites ; And what Security can or will you have from our Oaths , who must first make us to break the Tye of our own Conscience before we can take them ? It can't be thought , we should keep with you , when you make us break with our selves . VII . Consider what express Scripture we have for it , and that in the Judgment and Martyrdom of many good and famous Persons . VIII . Be pleased to weigh the great PERJURY that is now in our World , and daily Numerous Oaths belcht forth by some , to show they dare be bold with Sacred Things ; by others , to vent Passion ; by too many ( as they impiously think ) to grace their Matter , whilst others have so great Doubt of their own Credit , that they Swear , to drive , what they say , home ; and not a few use it , meerly to fill up vacant places , being barren of better Matter . We tkink that instead of taking Advantage against us for Not Swearing , in so Forswearing an Age , we should rather receive Incouragement for speaking That Truth without an Oath , which others are compell'd to by Oath , if yet they speak it . False-speaking necessitated the Use of Oaths ( say many ) But Oaths proving now not the Remedy , but the Disease , What better Expedient can be used then to come back to Truth-speaking , which endeth Oaths in their first Cause , or Occasion at least : However , that such as are not Sick should be oblig'd to take the Potions of the Sick , only to keep them Company , That seems Vnreasonable . IX . Be pleased to consider the perishing Difficulties we meet withal in our Commerce in the World , particularly as Creditors , Executors , Merchants , Ship-Masters , Apprentices , &c. Men making us pay because of our Tenderness in this Matter . Oh the OPPRESSION that is exercised in Petty Courts and Sessions upon many Hundreds of us , who know not which Way to Right our selves , an Oath still being required in the Case ; the Refusal of which for Conscience sake , exposing us to great Losses , both of Estate , Liberty and sometimes Life by Tedious and Cruel Imprisonments . X. But the Loss and Trouble is not alwayes our own ; Our Neighbours frequently become Sufferers against our Wills : First , In that we can perform no Office in common with them , however otherwise able to discharge it . Secondly , Nor can we serve them in the Capacity of Witnesses , which Qualification goes a great Way towards the Maintenance of Justice ; and all because our solemn Word will not be received instead of an Oath : Relieving us here is a double Benefit , for our Neighbours share with us in it ; and it manifestly tends to the Preservation of Society . And whatever any may please to think of us , we are as willing and ready to contribute all Honest Assistance to the Maintenance of Justice , and answering the Ends of Government , according to our Ability and Conscience , as any Sort of Men that live under it . XI . And Lastly , We intreat you further to consider , that Our CAUTION is as large as the Man that Swears : For though you make a Difference between him that tells an Vntruth , and he that Forswears , in Favour of the former ; yet we cheerfully submit our selves to the Punishment of the Perjured , if we break our WORD ; do you but please to take us into equal Priviledge with the Swearer : If there be any Dammage , we conceive it is done to Vs , who sustain the same Punishment for an Vntruth , which is the only Due of Perjury ; and if you condescend to yield us the Kindness of the one , we offer our Persons to answer the just Severity of the other . We will add here out of Hoof●'s History of the Netherlands , a President , not impertinent to our Purpose , fol. 464 , 465. translated out of Latin as follows . CXX . In this Assembly of the States ( saith Hooft ) there was something attempted towards the Oppression of the Menists , as appears by a certain Letter , written from Dort , the last of March , by the Ld. St. Aldegonde , to the Minister Caspanus Heidanus ; which was thus worded . The Cause of the Menists hath since receipt of your and Taffin's Letters yesterday been treated of with the most illustrious Prince ; And verely , I find it more difficult then I had hoped [ for ever may and will such Cursed Hopes meet with such Wise Repulses from prudent Rulers ] For , he had at Middelburgh given me great Hopes , that we should seclude from the Freedom of Burgesses , or at leaft , not so solemnly receive those that refused an Oath . Now he alledgeth , that such a thing cannot be concluded without a new Convulsion in the Churches , because the States will never suffer , that such a Law be made , as they judge no wayes conducing to the Common Good of the Republick . Yea , he avers , That this was the only Cause formerly , which brought their Consistories so far into the Displeasure of the States , that it differed very little , but they had been all at once voted down , and laid aside by the Council . That they [ the Clergy ] were now again about the same thing , and that in such a season , that no doubt many would pour in cold Water out of the Popish Hodg-podge . That his settled Judgment was , that this would turn to great Disadvantage , and breaking down of their Churches . And when I [ saith Aldegonde ] fervently urged , That we could easily reject those that broak the Band of all Humane Society , upon Pretence of Civil and Political Order : and when I added ( saith he ) how much Danger and Peril Church and State were threatned with by such a Conclusion of the Council , in it self Ungodly , He answered me sharply enough , That those men's YEA must pass for an Oath ; and that we must not urge this thing any further , or we must confess , that the Papists had Reason to Force us to a Religion that was against our Consciences ; and that the North-Hollanders would not at all allow of it . In short ( saith he ) I scarce see any thing we can get done in this Point , which verely [ ye may believe him upon his Protestation ] Is the greater Smart to me , the more I observe that the Minds of many Honest Men , by the pretending of I know not what unseasonable Stumbling Blocks , will be thereby imbitter'd , yea , I could almost say , wounded , to see them less affected ●o those , that to their uttermost seek to advance the Cause of the Church . The PRINCE ( saith he ) partly in the Name of the State , and partly of himself , chid me , as if we were about to set up in our Clergy a Dominion over the Conscience ; and as if they endeavour , by their Laws and Constitutions , to subject all others to them : And he praised the Saying of a Monk that was lately here , who answered to the Objection [ of the Persecuting Spirit of the Romish Church ] That our Pot had not gone so long to the Fire as theirs , whom we did so much revile upon that Account — And that he clearly saw , That before two Ages passed , the Church-Dominion would upon both sides stand on even Ground . To which Hooft adds , By this we may observe , of what Consequence the Prince and States then held Liberty of Conscience to be . And that what we have hitherto said may not be thought a thing impracticable , we shall present you with the Judgment and Edicts of Forreign Governments . Here follow Two Letters of the Grave of Nassou and Prince of Orange , to the Magistrates of the City of Middelburgh , in Behalf of the Menists there . CXXI . A Copy of the First Letter . FOrasmuch as a Supplication hath been presented unto his Excellency in behalf of certain Inhabitans of this City of Middelburg ; complaining thereby , That the Magistrates of the said City had lately caused their Shops to be shut , and consequently prohibited their Trade , which yet the only means which they have to maintain their Families ; the s●id Prohibition proceeding from their not having yet taken the Usual OATH , as others : The said Inhabitants further remonstrating , how that they now , for a certain long Term of Years , have , without taking the said Oath , freely born all Civil Burdens , Contributions and Taxes , equally with other Burgesses and Inhabitants of this said City , without ever having been in any Default : and therefore ought at present still to remain unmolested , seeing they do therein not desire any thing else , then to live in the Liberty of their Consciences , upon which Account this present War against the King of Spain hath been by his Subjects taken up , and all Ceremonies contrary thereunto resisted ; in which such Advance is , through the Help of God , made , that the afore-said Liberty of Conscience is preserved ; and therefore it would be an Unequal Thing to Deprive the Supplicants thereof , who have helped to acquire the same by bearing Taxes , Contributions , and other Burdens , not without great Peril of their Bodies and Lives ; consonant to which they having presented a Request to the aforesaid Magistrates , but got for Answer , That they must regulate themselves according to the Policy and Order of the aforesaid City : Whereby ( saith the Petition ) the aforesaid Magistrates seem to endeavour by the Oath , not only totally to ruin and expel out of these Lands the Petitioners , with their Wives & Children , residing in Middelburgh ; but consequently innumerable others , in Holland and Zeeland , who have ( according to his Excellency's Proclamations ) placed themselves under his Excellency's Protection , by which no man can be any wayes benefited ; but all these Lands received great and considerable Dammage , because thereby the Traffique thereof would be every where greatly diminished : Intreating therefore , and humbly begging his Excellency , that looking upon their Case with Compassion , he would take due Course about it , especially seeing that the aforesaid Petitioners do proffer , that their YEA passing for an Oath , the Transgressors hereof should be punished as Oath-Breakers . Therefore , his Excellency having considered the Premises , and having maturely deliberated upon the same , hath , with the previous Advice of the Governour and Council of Zeeland , ordered and appointed , ordereth and appointeth hereby , That the aforesaid Petitioners , YEA shall be received by the Magistrates of the aforesaid City instead of an OATH ; provided , that the Transgressors thereof shall be punished as Oath-Breakers and Perjured Persons . His Excellency charging and commanding the Magistra●es of Middelburgh , and all others whom this may concern , No further to oppress the Petitioners contrary to their Consciences , concerning the Oath ; but suffer them to Open their Shops , and Enjoy their Trades , as they formerly have done : all by Provision , and till such time as there shall be , in more Tranquillity of Affairs , with ripe Deliberation , regard being had thereunto , ordained therein , as shall be found convenient . By my Gracious Lord , the Prince , subscribed , De Baudemont . This done under his Excellency's Name and Seal , in the City of Middelburgh , upon the 26. January , 1577. Guilliaume de Nassou . CXXII . A Copy of the Second Letter . The Prince of Orange , Grave of Nassau , Lord and Baron of Bueda , Diest , &c. Honourable , Honest , Worshipful , Wise , Discreet , Dear and Singular : FOrasmuch as certain House-keepers there inhabiting , being , as they say , Menists , have , by way of Complaint divers times signified to us , how that You are daily Molesting them , and Depriving them of the Means of Gaining in Rest & Quietness their Livings for them and their Families ; forbidding them to open their Shops , under the Pretence , that they should Refuse to take an Oath in the same Form as other Burgesses ; upon which we having taken ripe Deliberation : And forasmuch as the aforesaid People do proffer to bear equally all Burdens with other Citizens , and even in the Case of Arms , which mostly moves them to contribute , do you such Performances at their Charges , as your selves , or they that shall have the Orders shall find in all Reason and Equity fit to be done , and they will bear it : We therefore conceive , that ye do very ill , not to permit them to live in Peace and Quietness , according to the Mind of their Conscience , according to the Act which we , with the Advice of the Governour and Council formerly afforded them , which they say , they have exhibited to you ; And yet notwithstanding , we find that you have hitherto refused to give heed unto it , and to our precedent Letters , and so we are constrain'd for this last time to write this , by which we plainly declare unto you , That it concerns not you to trouble your selves in particular with any Man's Conscience , so long as nothing is tre●ted or done that might extend to any Man's Scandal ; in which Case we will neither respect nor bear any Man. And therefore we charge and order you expresly , To desist all further Molestation or Hinderance of the said Menists in their Merchandize or Handicrafts to gain their Livelihood for their Wives and Children ; suffering them to open their Shops , and work as they have in times past done ; till such time as there shall be otherwise ordered by the Generality ( who are thereunto qualified ) And therefore take heed that ye do nothing against this , and the Act to them granted , or to further any Fines from them upon that Account ; provided , nothing be by them attempted , which might tend to the Scandal of any Man : And they shall bear all Civil and Equal Burdens , as other Men. Herewith , &c. subscribed by Copy , De Baudemont . CXXIII . Also , by the Treaties of Peace between the States General of the United Provinces , and the Kings of England , Spain , &c. ann . 1674. there is a special Article therein contained , That All their Ship-Masters of Merchant Ships , shall carry along with them a Sea-Brief , according to the Form thereby prescribed . In which it is expresly declared , tha● Such Master shall come before the Magistrates , and by his solemn Oath testifie , that such Ship , whereof he is Master , doth properly belong unto the Subjects of the said States General ; unto which Sea-Brief , under the Seal of the City's intire Faith and Credit is given . And although by the said Treaties , the Master was to give his Oath , yet the Magistrates in Holland do take the Solemn Affirmation of such as Cannot Swear instead of an Oath , and insert it so accordingly in their Sea-Briefs ; and then it runs thus , These are to certifie , &c. That A.B. hath before us Solemnly Affirmed and Declared , that the Ship C.D. whereof he is Master , doth properly belong and appertain to the Subjects of the States General of the United Provinces , &c. Which can be sufficiently evidenced , if required . This was the Care , this the Condescension of other Governments , for the Relief of Persons under our Circumstances : And we take Liberty to affirm , That the Trade and Wealth of the Vnited Provinces , are owing more to the Ingenuity and Industry of those Indulg'd Dissenters then to them of the National Religion , who would have slugg'd and tyranniz'd all into Poverty and Vassallage . Have Regard to our Suffering Condition , we beseech you , and shew your selves both Natural to a Member ( be we reputed the meanest ) of your own Civil Body , and so far Lovers of him who said , Swear not at all , as not to continue us Sufferers for not acting against his Command , at least , our Sense of it , and therein of our own Consciences ; But make some Provision for us , as well as other Countries have done before you , as in your Wisdom you shall think meet ; that all those , who are of the Society of the People called Quakers , and known of themselves to be so , shall not be molested for the future upon the Account of Swearing , but their S●lem● YEA or NAY shall be taken in lieu thereof , and their Untruth , or Breach of Word , Punishable as Perjury . God , we know , that delights in Mercy , and in all Acts of Tenderness to the Sons of Men , will favour so Natural , so Generous and so Christian an Enterprize ; and the Proposers , Promotors & Effecters of this happy Deliverance from the heavy Clog of Swearing , under which we and our Families have so long groaned , will not , we da●e believe , go without their Rewards at the Hands of the Almighty , whom , at what rate soever ye shall deal with us , we do , from the bottom of our Souls , humbly and heartily implore , That it would please him so to dispose your Hearts , as ●ou may best Discharge that High Trust reposed in you , to the Ho● of his Great Name , and the Prosperity of this Famous 〈◊〉 , the most certain Foundation of True Feli●ity 〈…〉 ●nd which will give , as a good Example 〈…〉 ●st Reputation to you and your Posterity . This perform'd in the 〈…〉 for the Service of the Pe●le 〈…〉 William 〈…〉 Richardson . Notes, typically marginal, from the original text Notes for div A70779-e3570 * Lived before Chr. 200. years . H. Grotius on Mat. 5. Bp. Gauden of Oaths , p. 36. in Psalm 14. ●amb . 20. Commen● . on Hebr. c 6. Hom. 9. on Acts 3. Hom. Psal . 5. Ad Pop. Antioc . on Mat. 5. on Mat. 5. on Psal . 14. on Mat. 5. Vit. Chr. p. 2. c. 12. on Mat. 5. p. 17. and 23. on Mat. 5.3 , 37. Deutr. 6.13 ▪ 14 , 15. Mic. 6.8 . Bish . Gaud. of Oaths , p. 41. Acts 17.28 . Ephes . 4.6 . Numb . 5 21 , 22. Fest. ad Lapid . Polyb. l. 3. c. 25. Alex. ab Alex. l. 5. gen dier . 10. Cic. l. 5. Ep. 1. Arist . 3 Pol. 10. Plin. in pan . ad . Trajan . c. 64. Lindenbro . c. 3. sect . 7. Bp. R. Sanders . de Jur Oblig . p. 141. Joh. 14.15 . & 15.10 , ●4 . Mat. 16.24 . Mat 5.20.48 . 1 Thess . 5.23 . Phil. 3.14 . Ephes . 4.13 . 1 Pet. 2.21 , 23. 1 John 4.17 . Ephes . 4.20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25. These Nations were many Hundred Years bef . Christ . Liv'd before Christ about 1280. years ; being in the dayes of Gideon , Judg. 8. Bef . Christ 800. years ; in the dayes of Hosea , Joel and Amos. Bef . Christ 620. years ; in the dayes of Josiah . Bef . Christ 593. years . Bef . Christ 500. years ; These Three Persons liv'd in the time of Jeremiah and Ezekiel . Bef . Christ 560. years . Bef . Christ 422. years ; in the time of Ahasuerus , Ezra 4. Bef . Christ 422. years ; in the dayes of Haggai & Zachariah . Bef . Christ 400. years . Bef . Christ 394. years . These two lived in the days of Malachi . Bef . Christ 266. years . Bef . Christ 337. Years . Bef . Christ 336. Years . If it be a great Good , not to Swear at all ; what is it to Impose an Oath ? Page 583. Page 515. Euseb . Eccl. Hist . lib. 4. cap. 15. Euseb . lib. 4. cap. 16. Tertullian was a Lawyer , Son to a Centurion of Pro●consular Dignity . See his Life . Rigaltius adds , I will speak plainly , that the Emperor is Lord , but after the common manner . Tertul. ad Scap. c. 1 , 2. Apol. c. 33. * I do offer Sacrifice by Prayer , c. 30. Tertul. de Idololatria , cap. 11. It is confest by le Prieur , that the Christians did deny all Swearing . Bruno and Cassiodorus on Psalm 14. & Psalm . 61. This Cassiodorus was a Roman Senator & Counsellor of Theodoricus , about the year 490. * There are about 2000. Corrections in Tertullian his Works . Suarez . de Juram . c. 2. * Infidelity keeps Company with Swearing : And for a Christian to Swear , is with Clem. Alexandr . to turn Infidel again . He makes two Prohibitions , as we do : 1. Swear not by God ; 2. by no Creatures . Ibid. Tract . 35. Mat. 26. Num. 5.19 . 1 King. 22.16 . Orig. against all Swearing with us ; and Compelling . Orig. on Jer. 4.1 , 2. Cypr. Epist ad Corn. n. 5 Cyprian de Mortal . Euseb . apud Stob. de Jure●ur . c. 27. Athanas his Abhorrence and Derision of Oaths . Athanasius his Reason and Dislike of Oaths . Object . Answ . Athanasius will not have it , that God ever swoar , properly & strictly taken ; only in a way of speaking , having the Truth & Immutability of the truest and greatest Oath This , if that Clemens , should have been first , because he liv'd in Paul's time ; but we were not willing to begin our Testimonies with a Suspicion : howbeit it is an Ancient Writing . l. 6. c. 25. Socrat. Eccl. Hist . lib. 4. cap. 21. * Pray mark where Basil layeth the Blame , if a Word go not for an Oath . Joseph swore not . Paul swore not . Ad Nepotes . above 300. l. Basil . Mag. can . 29. Basil's Expedient , to remove Oaths . The Reason of prohibiting Oaths . God swears not . Paul did not Swear . See Tertullian before , to whom this agrees . Mark how Gregor . Naz. speaks of the Scripture , in Comparison of God's Omnipresence with the mind and the sense , and regard man ought to have of it . Greg. Naz. his Account of an Oath . Greg. Naz. on Cant. Hom. 18. Exhortat . ad Virgin. Ambrose on Mat. 5. * He was for Inspiration & Perfection . Psalm 109. Ambr. Com. on Heb. c. 6. Oaths founded on Defect , not to be encouraged ; then not to be imposed . Id. Hom. Psa . 5. Ad pop . Antioch . Hom. 19. The Reason of Oaths . Against the Dispraise of solitary Life l. 1. Of Compunction of Heart , l. 1. Against the Jews , Hom. 34. Agreeing with Euse bius before . The Godly Zeal of Chrysostom Commendable . Much less to force others . Chrys . calls Swearing & Compelling to Swear at all , an Error ; then we are Orthodox . See his great Praise in Soc. Schol. l. 6. c. 3. He was of the Race of Senators . Remember Tertullian's Case by this . Homil. 28. Ecclog . de juram . Hom. 5. ad pop . Avitioc . Chrysost . against giving an Oath . Chrysost . exexhorts to be Right Quakers by Trembling , & not Swearing . Against Compelling to Swear , & shows how to avoid it . He differs much from those that punish us for not swearing . On Mat. Homil. 17. ● Object . Constancy in not Swearing getteth Veneration . Object . Great Rea●on . Object . This is True Christian Doctrine . With Christians it ought to be so . What Evil is it then to hale men back again upon Penalties ? * A great Enemy to Images . † The Reason why God admitted Oaths . No Ordinance of God or man originally , but ▪ Corruption insensibly brought it , & God only suffer'd it by a true Deity till the Times of Reformation . Object . His Reason our Reason . Object . Much regarded and observed by venerable Antiquity , said Jam●s and the Fathers , part 2. page 36. Act. Mon. v. 1. p. 701. A Great ●ruth ; Forswearing ends in No Swearing . Excellently distinguisht , and the Sordidness of Oaths fully represented . According to Eusebius . The Unhappiness of Swearing , especially against Conscience . His Advice about the — Matter , when drove to a Pinch . Object . His Caution to those that impose Oaths , and Reflection upon the Practice . Lying as bad as Swearing in his Esteem . Admirably well argued . His Rebuke to the Clergy for tendring the Gospels ( or Bible ) to swear on . Again , the Original of an Oath . He concurs with us . The Definition of an Oath . A severe Declamation against Compelling People to swear . Again , of the Danger of Compelling People to swear ▪ Object . Object . Object . Object . * An Oath is a Binding of God for our Security . A Pathetical Censure of Oaths , and them that use them even in Courts With what Tenderness God's Name should be used . Chrysostom's Boldness . He testifies our Mind . † Mark the great Zeal of Chrysost . in this place . * Men never could plead Conscience for not being believed without an Oath ; many have , to be credited without one . * This was Chrysostom 's Exhortation Now it s said , How can we Trade without an Oath ? Object . Encouragement to sustain the Penalty . Our Doctrine made an Axiom by Chrysostom . Hom. 10. p. 101. God never ●wore properly . An excellent Reason why Oaths were permitted . This between the Two Stars seems a self-contradiction ; but doubtless he intends it of the 2d Prohibition in a further Reason , why Oaths were permitted . This between the Two Stars seems a self-contradiction ; but doubtless he intends it of the 2d Prohibition in a further Reason , why Oaths were permitted . If men can't Swear safely , then it is more dangerous to swear then not to swear and it is better for People , nay , they are bound to refuse it . de mend●c . It is obscure & intricate . De Verb. Jacobi , Ante omnia nolite jurare , Serm. 28. * If it belongs to the Righteousness of the Kingdom of Heaven , Not to Swear , then what will become of those that not only break that Commandment of , Swear not at all , but teach men so to do ? nay , punish men for not obeying such Anti-Evangelical Doctrine . † Then certainly they are to be rejected of true Christians . Euseb . Pam. Socr. Schol. Evagr. &c. Thes . 1.1 . Phil. 3.15 . Soc. l. 6. c. 1● Evagr. l. cap. 11. c. 9. Euseb . Eccl. His . l. 8 c. 28. l. 4. c. ●5 . Pelagiu● , a Brittain , an . 400. wrote Notable Books , saith Sennaida , who lived soon after him . See Baronius , an ▪ 1310. Joh. Walden against John Wickl●f and Waldenses . Reiner . Rub. Capitan . W. W●dford . Gui Carmel . V●ss . Histor . Pelag. l. 5 p. 2. Bp. Vsher , de Success . de Juramentis , l. 1. c. 1 , 2. Agreeing with Chrysostom . L. 1. c. 15. Ep. lib. 1. Epist . 155. Not to require an Oath by any means of another man. On Mat. 5. Suspicion , the Cause of an Oath . On Deut. 6. A smart and true Answer . Nilus forbids Oaths . On Jer. 4. Cyril . See Catena . 65. Grae● . Patr. on Luk. 1. p. 23. On Psal . 94. agreeth with Augustine . On Eccles . 8. Chap. 31. Beda in Ep. Jam. c. 5. Spelm. Brit. Council . p. 260. On the Revelations , p. 196. * He makes Oaths Jewish , at least in Opposition to Evangelical ; because imperfect , & permitted to the Jews in Condescension . p. 3. q. 59. See Bibliotheca veter . Patrum . They all agre in the Reason of suffering Oathes under the Law , viz. the Jews Weakness . Vid. Baron . Anno 1310. Joh. Walden adv . Wicklif & Waldens . Reiner . Rub. Capitan . W. Woodford . De Success . l. 6. Ban. Anno 1310. n. 3. J. Fox Mart. v. 1. p. 527. Men honoured by Protestants . J. Fox Mart. v. 1. p. 554 , to 558. Geff. Chauc . Works , fol. 86. J. Fox Mart. v. 1. p. 614 , 618. J. Fox Mart. v. 1. p. 623 , 359. J. Fox Mart. v. 1. p. 687. * If they could not , it was then held none could ; so that then it was denying all Tenders . Ibid. p. 701 , 702. J. Fox Mart. v. 3. p. 910 , 911. Spots . Hist . pag. 61. W.C. Albrid p. 193 , 194 , 195. Morl. Hist . p. 217 , 218. J. Fox Mart. v. 2. p. 420. Comm. on Mat. 5. Erasm . here plainly forbiddeth all Swearing on any account . Comm. on Jam. 5. Then not by God ; for the common people esteemed him sacred . Gloss on Mat. 5. p. 22. On Mat. 5. fol. 18. Comm. on Mat. 5. On 1 King. 12. n. 3. II. On Mat. 5. p. 23 , 24. De quaest . jur . Christ . p. 306. pag. 227. Hom. 18. in Cant. pag. 276. Const . 6. & 11. Comm. on 1 Tim. 1. pag. 210. Lindenbrog . Cod. l●g . antiquar . Ibid. Ibid. Ibid. On Mat. 5. & De Jur. Bell. ac Pac. p. 2. c. 26. ad 47. De juram . Praelect . 5. Viz. All their Reverent Fathers in God , Arch-Bishops , Bishops , Deans , and the● Judges of the Land , Justices of the Peace , and all Officers term'd Ecclesiastical or Civil , Judges , Priests and People NO Christians , else would they suffer Christ's Doctrine to be obeyed , who not only enforce OATHS on Strangers , but having the like D●ffidence , One Father in God of Another , one Judge and Justice of another , impose them on their Brethren and Fathers , with Equal D●strust .