A Discourse concerning a guide in matters of faith with respect especially to the Romish pretence of the necessity of such a one as is infallible. Tenison, Thomas, 1636-1715. 1683 Approx. 104 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 25 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2005-10 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A64357 Wing T695 ESTC R37882 17150689 ocm 17150689 105906 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A64357) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 105906) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 1160:15) A Discourse concerning a guide in matters of faith with respect especially to the Romish pretence of the necessity of such a one as is infallible. Tenison, Thomas, 1636-1715. [6], 43 p. Printed for Ben. Tooke ... and F. Gardiner ..., London : 1683. Other eds. show author's name on t.p. Advertisement: 1 sheet bound before t.p. Running title: Of a guide in matters of faith. Errata: prelim. p. [6] Reproduction of original in the Union Theological Seminary Library, New York. Includes bibliographical references. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Catholic Church -- Controversial literature. Popes -- Infallibility. Faith. 2003-05 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2003-06 SPi Global Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2005-02 Rachel Losh Sampled and proofread 2005-02 Rachel Losh Text and markup reviewed and edited 2005-04 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion BOOKS Printed for Fincham Gardiner . 1. A Perswasive to Communion with the Church of England . 2. A Resolution of some Cases of Conscience which respect Church-Communion . 3. The Case of Indifferent things used in the Worship of God , proposed and Stated , by considering these Questions , &c. 4. A Discourse about Edification . 5. The Resolution of this Case of Conscience , Whether the Church of Englands Symbolizing so far as it doth with the Church of Rome , makes it unlawful to hold Communion with the Church of England ? 6. A Letter to Anonymus , in answer to his three Letters to Dr. Sherlock about Church-Communion . 7. Certain Cases of Conscience resolved , concerning the Lawfulness of joyning with Forms of Prayer in Publick Worship . In two Parts . 8. The Case of mixt Communion : Whether it be Lawful to Separate from a Church upon the account of promiscuous Congregations and mixt Communions ? 9. An Answer to Dissenters Objections against the Common Prayers , and some other parts of Divine Service prescribed in the Liturgy of the Church of England . 10. The Case of Kneeling at the Holy Sacrament stated and resolved , &c. In two Parts . 11. A Discourse of Profiting by Sermons , and of going to hear where Men think they can profit most . 12. A serious Exhortation , with some important Advices relating to the late Cases about Conformity , recommended to the present Dissenters from the Church of England . 13. An Argument to Union ; taken from the true interest of those Dissenters in England who profess and call themselves Protestants . 14. Some Considerations about the Case of Scandal , or giving Offence to the Weak Brethren . 15. The Case of Infant-Baptism , in Five Questions , &c. 16. The Charge of Scandal , and giving Offence by Conformity , Refelled , and Reflected back upon Separation , &c. 1. A Discourse about the charge of Novelty upon the Reformed Church of England , made by the Papists asking of us the Question , Where was our Religion before Luther ? 2. A Discourse about Tradition , shewing what is meant by it , and what Tradition is to be received , and what Tradition is to be rejected . 3. The Difference of the Case between the Separation of Protestants from the Church of Rome , and the Separation of Dissenters from the Church of England . 4. The Protestant Resolution of Faith , &c. A DISCOURSE Concerning a GUIDE IN Matters of Faith ; With respect , especially , to the ROMISH pretence of the necessity of such a one as is infallible . LONDON , Printed for Ben. Tooke at the Ship in St. Paul's Church-yard , and F. Gardiner at the White-horse in Ludgate-street . 1683. THE CONTENTS . THE Question , Whether a Man , without submitting his judgment to an infallible Guide on Earth , may arrive at certainty in Matters of Faith. p. 1. The Moment of this Question . p. 2. The Temptations to a belief of the negative part of it , Sloth and vitious Humility . p. 2. The Resolution of the Question in six Propositions . p. 3. Propos. 1. The True Faith and the Profession of it never failed yet , nor shall it ever fail , in all places . 3 , 4 , 5. Propos. 2. Wheresoever God requires Faith , he gives means sufficient for the obtaining of it . 5 , 6. Propos. 3. Whatsoever those means are , the Act of Assent is ultimately resolved into each Mans reason . 6 , 7 , 8. Propos. 4. No true reason directeth to an infallible Guide on Earth . 8. This is proved by several Considerations . Consid. 1. God did not set up such a Guide amongst the Israelites . 8 , 9. Consid. 2. God hath no where promised such a Guide to Christians . 9 , 10. Either directly . 10 , 11 , 12. Or by consequence . 12 , 13. Consid. 3. God hath not given direction for the finding of such a Guide ; which he would have done , had he designed the setting of him up . 13 , 14. Consid. 4. We cannot find out such a one by the strictest enumeration . 14. For 1. This Guide is not the Church diffusive of the first Ages . 14. Nor 2. The Faith of all the Governours of all the Primitive Churches . 14. Nor 3. An Universal or General Council . 14 , 15 , 16 , 17. Which whilst the Reformed deny , they do not assume to themselves such Authority in their Synods . 17 , 18. Nor 4. Is this Guide any present Church pretending to declare the sense of the Churches of former Ages . 18 , 19. Nor 5. Is this Guide the Bishop of Rome . 20. This is shewed by the following Arguments . Arg. 1. The Romanists themselves are not at agreement about his Authority . 20. Arg. 2. The infallible Guidance of it is denied in the publick form of the Popes Profession . 21. Arg. 3. His Plea for this Guidance as Successor of St. Peter is insufficient . 21. Arg. 4. The Writings of the Popes manifest their Ignorance and Fallibility . 21. Both in lesser matters . 22 , 23. And in Matters of Faith. 23. Particularly , Pope Vigilius erred in a Matter of Faith. 23 , 24. And Pope Honorius . 24 , 25 , 26. Arg. 5. There seems not , in the constituting such a Guide , either necessity or fitness . 26. Propos. 5. The Reformed , especially those of the Church of England , refuse not all Ecclesiastical Guidance , though they submit not to any pretended infallible Guide . 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30. Nor doth our Church pretend to immediate illumination in Matters of necessary Faith. 30 , 31. Nor doth it exalt private reason to the prejudice of just Authority . 31 , 32. But the Vnlearned have more of the just Guidance of Authority in it , then in the Church of Rome it self . 32. Propos. 6. Though Ecclesiastical Authority is a help of our Faith , yet the Scripture is the only infallible rule of it . 32 , 33. This Proposition is handled in three Assertions . Assert . 1. A Man , without a Papal Guide , may know which are the true Canonical Books . 33 , 34. Assert . 2. He may also find out the necessary Articles of Faith contained in those Books . 35. The necessary Doctrines are therein contained . 35 , 36. The sense of the words in which they are delivered , may be found out without submission to such a Guide . 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , &c. Assert . 3. A submission of our unprejudiced Assent to the Holy Scripture as the Rule of Faith , is the true means to Vnion in Faith in the Christian Church . p. 42. ERRATA . PAge 2. marg . l. 5. for , affirmative r. negative . p. 16. l. 13. for , Abots r. Abbots . p. 17. l. 10. for doubts r. doubles . p. 18. l. 21. for Christian Ancient r. Ancient Christian. p. 19. l. 19. for , them r. it . p. 20. l. 27. blot out the Comma betwixt Mauritius and Burdin . p. 22. l. 13. for . Salvations r. Salutations . p. 23. l. 2. after this add ; refuse matter , It. l. 12. for nomina r. nomine p. 24. l. 3. after ▪ of , — add , an . l. 25. for , rigour r. vigour . p. 26. marg . l. 3. for Consid. 5. r. Arg. 5. p. 36. marg . put p. 583. after Critique . p. 38. l. 1. for Council r. Counsel . p. 40. l. 6. for , relectance r. reluctance . A DISCOURSE Concerning a GUIDE IN Matters of Faith. THE design of this Discourse is the Resolution of the following Query . Whether a Man who liveth where Christianity is profess'd , and refuseth to submit his Judgment to the Infallibilty of any Guide on Earth , and particularly to the Church or Bishop of Rome , hath , notwithstanding that refusal , sufficient means still left him whereby he may arrive at certainty in those Doctrines which are generally necessary to the Salvation of a Christian Man. Satisfaction in this Inquiry is of great Moment . For it relateth to our great end , and to the way which leads to it . And it nearly concerneth both the Romanists and the Reformed . If there be not such a Guide , the Estate of the Romanists is extreamly dangerous . For then the Blind take the Blind for their unerring Leaders ; and being once misled , they wander on without correcting their Error , having taken up this first as their fixed Principle , that their Guide cannot mistake the way . On the other hand , If God hath set up in his Church a Light so very clear and steddy as is pretended ; the Reformed are guilty of great presumption , and expose themselves to great uncertainty , by shutting their Eyes against it . Now , there lyes before Men a double Temptation to a belief of the being of such a Guide in the Christian Church ; Sloth and Vitious Humility of Mind . Sloth inclineth Men rather to take up in an Implicit Faith , than to give themselves the trouble of a strict Examination of things . For there is less Pain in Credulity , then in bending of the Head by long and strict Attention and severe Study . Also there is a Shew of Humility , in the deference which our understandings pay unto Authority ; especially to that which pretends to be , under Christ , Supreme on Earth . Although , in the paying of it without good reason first understood , Men are not Humble but Slavish . But these Temptations prevail not upon honest and considerate Minds , which inquire , without prejudice , after Truth , and submit to the Powerful Evidence of it . Such will resolve the Question in the Affirmative ; and they may reasonably so do by considering these Propositions which I shall treat of in their order . First , The Christian Church never yet wanted , nor shall it ever want , either the Doctrines of necessary Faith , or the Belief and Profession of them . Secondly , Wheresoever God requireth the Belief of them , he giveth means sufficient for Information and unerring Assent . Thirdly , Whatsoever those means are , every Man 's Personal reason giveth to the Mind that last Weight which turneth Deliberation into Faith. Fourthly , The means which God hath given us towards necessary Faith and the certainty of it , is not the Authority of any Infallible Guide on Earth . Yet , Fifthly , All Ecclesiastical Guidance is not to be rejected , in our pursuance of the Doctrines of Christian Faith , in the finding out or stating of which it is a very considerable help . Sixthly , By the help of it , and Principally as it offers to us the Holy Scriptures in the Quality of the Rule of Faith , we have means sufficient to lead us to certainty in that Belief which is necessary to Life Eternal . First , The Acknowledgment and Profession of the necessary Doctrines of the Christian Faith , are annexed inseparably to the Christian Church . There is but one Faith ; and according to the saying of Leo the great * , If it be not one , it is not at all : For it cannot be contrary to it self . And though it be but one , yet Men of differing Creeds pretend to it , as the Merchants of Relicks in the Church of Rome shew , in several places , the one seamless Coat of Christ † . This one Faith never did , nor ever shall in all places fail . The Apostles were themselves without error both in their own assent to the Fundamentals of the Christian Faith , and in the delivery of them . They heard the Oracles of Christ from his own mouth , and they were Witnesses of his Resurrection ; And they spake * what they had seen and heard . And they gave to the World Assurance of the Truth , by the miraculous signs of their Apostolical Office. And if they had not had such Assurance themselves , and could not have given proof to others of their mission , there would have been a defect in the first promulgation of the Gospel ; and such as could not afterwards have been amended . That which , at first , had been delivered with uncertainty , would , with greater uncertainty , have been conveighed down to after Ages ; and Men , who , in process of time , graft error upon certain Truth , would much more have grafted error upon uncertain Opinion . Ever since the Apostles times there has been True Faith , and the Profession of it in the Catholick Church : And it will be so till Faith shall expire , and Men shall see him on whom they before believ'd . For a Church cannot subsist without the Fundamentals of Christianity . And Christ hath Sealed this Truth with his promise , that there shall be a Church as long as this World continues . * I mean by a Church a visible Society of Christians both Ministers and People ; for publick Worship on Earth cannot be invisible . But the True Faith and the Profession of it is not fixed to any place , or to any succession of Men in it . God's Providence has written the contrary in the very Ashes of the Seven Churches of the lesser Asia . Neither is any particular Church , though so far infallible in Fundamentals as to be preserved from actual error , an infallible Rule to all other Christians . If they follow the Doctrine of it , they err not , because it is true ; but if they follow that Church as an unerring Guide or Canon , they mistake in the Rule and Motive of their Faith. For that particular Church which Teacheth Truth , might possibly have err'd ▪ and the Church which errs , might have shined with the True Light. But the whole Church cannot so err in any Age ; for then the very being of a Church would cease . Neither doth it , hence , follow , that the Faith of the Roman Church , when Luther arose , was the only true and certain Doctrine . For that Church was not then the only visible Church on Earth . The Greek Church ( for instance sake ) was than more visible than now it is , and more Orthodox : The Rich Papacy having much prevailed upon the necessities of it by Arguments guilded with Interest . That Church did not err in Fundamental Points ; the Article of the Procession of the Holy Ghost from the Father by the Son , which the Romans accuse of Heresie , being easily acquitted of it , if Men , agreeing in the sense , forbear contention about the Phrases . Besides ; if our Fore-Fathers under the Papacy embraced the True Faith , we have it still ; the Faith not being removed , but the Corruption . Their Question therefore [ Where was your Religion before Luther ? ] is not more pertinent amongst Disputers than this is amongst Husbandmen , [ Where was the Corn before it was weeded ? ] We have seen that necessary Faith is perpetual , and it is as manifest that wheresoever God requireth the belief of it , he vouchsafeth sufficient means for information , and unerring Assent . Of all he does not require this belief , for to all the Gospel is not preached , and where it is preached there are Infants , and Persons of Age so distempered in Mind , as to remain unavoidably Children in understanding . And though the same Sum of Doctrines is generally necessary to Salvation , yet the Creed of all Men is not of equal length , seeing they have unequal capacities . But wheresoever there is a particular Society of Men , who call themselves a Church , yet err actually in the necessary Articles of the Faith , it is certain they were not forced into that error for want of external means . For the Just Judge of the World would never have required Unity in the Faith upon pain of his Eternal displeasure , if he had not given to Men Power sufficient for such Unity . No Tyrant on Earth has been guilty of such undisguised injustice as that is , which maketh a Law for the punishment of the Blind because they miss their way . The Art●cles of Christian Religion come not to the Mind by natural reason but by Faith ; and Faith comes by hearing or reading ; and where these means are not offered , a Man is rather an Ignorant Person than an Unbeliever . Wherefore our Saviour told the perverse Jews , * that if the Messiah had never been reveal'd to them , they had not been answerable for the Sin of Infidelity : But that , since he was come to them , and by them despised , their Infidelity was blackned with great aggravation . The means , then , are sufficient wheresoever the end is absolutely required ; but whatsoever those means are , the Act of Assent is to be ultimately resolved into each Mans Personal reason . For no Man can believe or assent but upon some ground or motive which appears credible to him . He could not believe unless he had some reason or other why he believed . When all is done ( said Mr. Thorndike * ) Men must and will be Judges for themselves . I do not quote the saying because it is extraordinary , but because that Learned Man said it who was careful to pay to Authority its minutest dues . If a Man believes upon Authority , he hath a further reason for the believing of it . He is not willing to take Pains in examining that which is proposed to him ; or he thinks himself of less Ability in understanding than those from whom he borrows his Light. If he desireth another to judge for him , his choice is determined by the Opinion he hath conceived of him . Every Man has his reason , though it be a weak one , and such as cannot justify it self or him . Something at last turns the Ballance , though it be but a Feather . This the Romanists own as well as the Reformed , till it toucheth them in the case of a new Convert . To induce a Man of another particular Church to embrace their Communion , they submit these weighty points to his private Judgment : What is a True Church , and which are the marks of it ? What is the Roman Church ? And whether the marks of the True Church do only belong unto the Roman ? What Men or what Books speak the sense of that Church ? They tell us * That the Light of a Man 's own reason first serves him so far as to the discovery of a Guide ; Also that , in this discovery , the Divine Providence hath left it so clear and evident , that a sincere and unbyassed quest cannot miscarry . But when once this Guide is found out , the Man is afterwards , for all other things that are prescribed by this Guide , to subject and resign his reason . As if it were not as difficult to judge of such a Guide , as of his direction . It seems , the Roman Church is like a Cave , into which a Man has Light enough to enter ; but when once he is entred , he is in thick Darkness . But , how subservient soever our reason may be to our Faith ; The means which God hath given us towards the certain attaining of it , is not the Authority of any infallible Guide on Earth . This will not be disbelieved by those who weigh well the following considerations . First , God did not set up such a constant , infallible Guide among the Jews ; though , at first , he gave Assurance to them by Miracle , that Moses had received his Commission from him , and had brought to them the Tables which he had Written , for their direction , with his own finger . Some of the Sanedrim were of the Sect of the Sadduces , who erred in the Fundamental point of a future State. Most of them erred in the Quality of the Messiah , not considering their Scriptures so much as their Traditions . And of the errors of the Levitical Priesthood there is , in the Old Testament , * frequent mention , and great complaint . And the Prophet Malachy , † as soon as he had said , The Priests lips shall preserve Knowledge , he adds this reproof , but ye are departed out of the way . It is true , the Israelites were , by God , directed in difficult cases to an Assembly of Judges * . But they were not Judges of controversies in Doctrine , but in Property . To their sentence the People were to submit , as to an expedient for Peace ; though Judgment might be perverted , or mistaken . It must be , also , confessed that God spake to them by the Oracle of Vrim , and that the voice of it was infallible . But its answers concerned not the necessary Rudiments of the Mosaick Law , but emergencies in their civil affairs ; those especially of Peace and War. But if we admit that there was under Judaism a living infallible Guide ; it does not , thence , follow , that it must be so under Christianity . For their small precinct ( the People of which were thrice in a year to come up to the Temple ) was much more capable of such a judge than the Christian Church , which is as wide as the World. Also the new Revelation is more clear and distinct than the old one was , and stands not in such need of an Interpreter . Secondly , God hath , no where , promised Christians such a judge : He hath no where said that he hath given such a one to the Christian Church . And seeing such a one cannot be had without Gods supernatural assistance , the most knowing amongst Men being subject both to Error and to Falshood ; it is great arrogance , whilst the Scripture is silent , to say he is in being . And to affirm that if there were not such a Guide , God would be wanting in means sufficient for the maintenance of Peace and Truth , is presumptuously to obtrude the schemes of Mans fancy upon God's Wisdom . He can Govern his Church without our methods . Now , God hath no where promised such a judge to Christian Men ; though he hath promised help on Earth , and assistance from Heaven to Men diligent and sincere in their inquiries after Truths which are necessary for them . There are two places of Scripture , which are by some taken for Promises of such a nature , though they were not , by the Divine Wisdom , so intended . Of these , the First is that which was spoken by Christ unto St. Peter . * The Gates of Hell shall not prevail against ( the Church . ) Which Promise concerneth the Church in general , and the necessary Faith of it , and not any particular persons , or places , or successions of persons in them . And Christ doth here assure us , that the Gates of the Grave shall not swallow up the Church ; that it shall not enter in at them ; that it shall not die or perrish . But he doth not say he will preserve it by the means of any Earthly Infallible Guide . He can , by other ways , continue it till time it self shall fail . The other place of Scripture is , the promise of Christ a little while before his Ascension into the Heavens . † Lo , I am with you alway , even unto the end of the World : As long as this Age of the Messiah shall last , and that is the last time or Age. This promise is , indeed , made to the Apostles , and to their successors also . But it is a promise of general assistance ; and it is made upon condition that they go forth and make Disciples of all Men of all Nations , and Baptize them , and give them further instruction in the things which Christ gave in charge to them . And some of the successors of the Apostles have not performed these conditions ; and the Governour of the Church of Sardis had not held fast what he had received and heard . As God hath not promised an unerring Guide , so neither hath he said he hath set up such an one in any Church on Earth . He hath not said it , either directly , or by consequence . The places which are supposed directly to affirm this , are two , and both mistaken . One of them is that of Christ to his Disciples , after he had given Commission to them to preach the Gospel , * He that heareth you , heareth me ; me the infallible way and the Truth . This Speech , if it be extended to all Ministers , it makes them all infallible Guides . And it is certain they are so , as long as they deliver to the People what they received from Christ. But the words are especially directed to the seventy Disciples who were taught to preach a plain Fundamental Truth , that the Kingdom of God was come nigh to the Jews . † And these Disciples were able to give to the Jews a demonstration of the Truth of that Doctrine which they taught , by miraculous signs : By healing the Sick , * and doing , among them , mighty works . Another place , used as an express Testimony is that in the first to Timothy to whom St. Paul saith , that the Church is the Pillar and Ground of Truth . But this place also is misapplied . It seemeth to be spoken of that Church of Ephesus in which St. Paul advised Timothy to behave himself with singular care : Which place hath so far failed that the lofty Building called St. John's Church , † is now become a Turkish Mosch . But if it were spoken in a general sense , it would amount only to this meaning : A Christian Church is like a Pillar sustained by a Pedestal on which a writing is so fixed , that all who pass by may see it . It is ( as Jerusalem once was to the Heathen-World ) a City on a Hill : It is a visible Society which giveth notice to Jews and Gentiles of Christianity , and is instrumental to awaken their observation , and by their sense to prepare the way to their belief . For , this advertisement being so publickly given to them , they have fair occasion of examining the grounds of Christian Truth , which when they find , they will be induced to build upon them . In this sense likewise , though not in this alone , Apostolical Men were called Lights and Pillars . In the Book of the Revelation * this promise is made to him who persevereth in his Christianity , notwithstanding the cross which it brings upon him . Him will I make a Pillar in the Temple of my God , and I will write my name upon him , and the name of his God , and the name of the City of his God which is new Jerusalem [ or the Christian Church . ] And S. Chrysostom † gives S. Paul the Titles of the Light of the Churches , the Foundation of the Faith , the Pillar and Ground of Truth . The Governours of the Church do ministerially exhibit Christian Truth ; they do not by mere Authority impose it . Among the Places which are said to prove , by good consequence , that there is a Living Guide of Faith , that in the eighteenth of St. Matthews Gospel * is the Principal . There our Saviour , requireth his Followers , if their Brethren persisted in their offences , to tell it to the Church , and to esteem them no longer Members of their Society , if they despised the Sentence of it . From whence they conclude with strange Inadvertence , that such a Decree is therefore infallible . But our Lord speaks of their Brothers Trespasses against them , and not of his Heresie : And of the Discipline , and not of the Doctrine , either of the Synagogue or the Church . In which case if we submit , even where there is error in the Sentence , for Peace sake , and because we are come to the last Appeal ; we worthily sacrifice private Good to publick Order . And such Submission is safe in point of property , though not in point of Doctrine ; for we may , without Sin , depart from our property , but not from our Faith. Now , much of this that has been said in order to the explication of the foregoing places , might have been well omitted , if I had designed this little Discourse for the use only of such Romanists as had been conversant with the writings of the Fathers . For then I should have needed only to have cited those Ancients , and shewed that their sense of these several places was plainly different from the modern interpretations of the Church Men of Rome . And , by this way of arguing , they are self-condemned . For they fall according to their own Rule of expounding Scripture by the unanimous consent of the Primitive Fathers , who with one voice , speak another sense . Those who doubt of this may receive satisfaction from the Learned Letters of Monsieur Launoy . * If God had promised an infallible Guide , or told us he had given one to his Church , he would , doubtless , have added some directions for the finding of him . For , to say in general , you shall have a Star which will always Guide you without all dangerous error ; and not to inform us in what part of the Firmament it is to be seen , is to amuse rather than to promise . Now , God hath no where given us such direction . He hath no where pointed us to this Church , or that Council ; to this Person , or that Local succession of Men. He hath not said the Guide is at Antioch , or Hierusalem ; at Nice , or Constantinople ; at Rome or Avignon . You will say , he hath directed us to St. Peter . I answer , no more than to the rest of the Apostles , to whom he gave equal power in their Ordination ; * All of whom he made equally Shepherds of the Flock ; † to all of whom he gave equal Commission to make Proselytes of all Nations . * And in this sense St. Chrysostom † affirmed concerning St. Paul that the whole World [ or the World of the Roman Empire ] was his Diocese . You will reply , that he promised , on him particularly upon this Rock , or Stone , this Kipha ( a Syriac Word of the Masculine Gender † ) this Peter ; to build his Church . I answer , the Ancients took the Word as Feminine , * and understood it rather of his Confession than of his Person . If it was spoken of his Person , it was spoken by way of Emphasis , not Exclusion ; for there were twelve Foundations † of these he might be called the first , having first preached the Gospel to Jews and Gentiles , * the Eleven standing up with him , and he speaking as the Mouth of the Apostolical Colledge . We cannot , by the strictest ennumeration , find out any living infallible Guide existing in any Age after St. Peter in the Christian Church . 1. This Guide could not be the Church diffusive of the first Ages . For the suffrages of every Christian were never gathered . And if we will have their sense , they must rise from the dead and give it us . 2. This Guide cannot be the Faith ( as such ) of all the Governours of all the Primitive Churches . The sum of it was never collected . There were anciently general Creeds , but such as especially related to the Heresies then on foot ; and who can affirm , upon grounds of certainty , that each Bishop in the World consented to each Article , or to each so expressed ? 3. This Guide is not a Council perfectly free and universal . For a Guide which cannot be had , is none . If such a Council could assemble , it would not err in the necessaries of Faith. For there cannot be a regular Flock without a Shepherd ; and if all the Spiritual Shepherds in the World should at once , and by consent , go so much astray ; the whole Flock of the Church Catholick would be scattered . And that would contradict the promise of Christ the Supreme , Faithful , Infallible Pastor . But there never was yet an universal Council properly so called : Neither can we suppose the probability of it but by supposing the being of one Temporal Christian Monarch of the World who might call , or suffer , it . In the Councils called General , if we speak comparatively , there were not many Southern or Western Bishops present at them . It was thus , at that first Oecumenical Council , the Council of Nice ; though , in one sacred place ( as Eusebius † hath noted ) there were assembled , Syrians and Cilians , Phoenicians , and Arabians ; Paloestinians Egyptians , Theboeans , Libyans , Mesopotamians ; a Persian , a Scythian Bishop ; and many others from other Countries . But there was but one Bishop for Africa , one for Spain , one for Gaul ; two Priests as Deputies of the infirm and Aged Bishop of Rome . Whilst ( for Instance sake ) there were seventeen Bishops for the small Province of * Isauria ; yet such Councils are very useful ; such we reverence ; but God did not set them up as the only and the infallible Guides of Faith. If these were such Guides , what Guided the Church which was before them ? By what rule was Ebion judged before the Council of Nice ? How can we be infallibly Guided by them in Controversies of Faith not determined by them ; nay not brought before them ; nay scarce moved till these latter days ? Such ( for the purpose ) are the Controversies about the vertue of the Sacrifice of Christ , and of Justification by the Faith of mere recumbence upon his Merits . Or how shall a private Man who errs in the Faith , be deliver'd from his Heresy , seeing he may die some years ere a Council can assemble , or , being assembled , can form its decrees . Arius vented his Heresy about ten years before the Council of Nice was called for the suppressing of it . And soon after he had given vent to it , it spread throughout Egypt and Lybia and the upper Thebes , as Socrates † has reported : And , in a short time many other Provinces and Cities were infected with the contagion of it . And , in the pretended Council of Trent , no less than five Popes were successively concerned ; and it lasted , in several places longer than two legal lives of a Man. * There was , indeed , a Canon in the Western Church † for the holding of a Council once in the space of each ten years : But that Canon has not been , hitherto , obeyed ; and as affairs stand in the Church , it is impracticable . For the Pope will exclude all the Greek and Reformed Bishops : he will crowd the Assembly with Bishops of his own Creation ; and with Abots also ; he will not admit of former Councils unless they serve his purpose ; not so much as that of Nice it self . * He will be the Judge , though about his own Supremacy . He will multiply Italians and others who , upon Oath † owe their votes to him . He will not hold a Council upon the terms approved by all Romish Princes . Nor did they agree at their last Council ; the Emperour would not send his Bishops to Bologna , nor the French King his to Trent . And though the French Church believed the Doctrines of that Synod , yet they did not receive them from the Authority of it , but they embraced them as the former Doctrines of the Roman Church . And the Parisian Faculty (a) prepared the way to the Articles of Trent . Notwithstanding all this , we firmly believe that at least the first four general Councils did not err in Faith ; and it is pious to think that God would not suffer so great a temptation in the Church on Earth . Yet still we believe those Councils not to be infallible in their constitution , but so far as they followed an infallible rule . For the greatest Truth is not always with the greatest number : And great numbers may appear on contrary sides . The Council of Constantinople under Constantine Copronymus , consisting of three hundred thirty eight Bishops , decreed against the use of Images in Churches . Yet the second Synod of Nice consisting of about three hundred and fifty Bishops determin'd for it . And , a while after , in the West , the Council of Frankford consisting of about three hundred Bishops , reversed that decree : And , after that , the Council of Trent did re-establish it ; though there the voting Persons were not fifty . With such uncertain doubts of belief must they move who follow a Guide in Religion without reference to a further rule . But , here , there is offered to us , by the Guide in Controversies , * an Objection , of which this is the sum . The fifth Canon of the Church of England does declare that the thirty nine Articles were agreed upon for the avoidance of the diversities of opinions and the establishing of consent touc●ing true Religion . Consent touching true Religion is consent in Matter , of Faith. Establishing of consent relateth both to Layety and Clergy . The third and fourth Canons of 1640. decree the Excommunication of those who will not abjure their holding Popery and Socinianism . The Re●ormed Churches in France teach the like Doctrine , threatning to cut them off from the Church who acqu●e●ce not in the resolution of a National Synod . † The same course was taken with the Remonstrants in the Synod of Dor● . * Wherefore Protestants ought not to detract from the Authority of general Councils , whilst they assume to themselves so great a Power in their particular Synods . The force of this Objection is thus removed . Every Church hath Power of admitting or excluding Members , else it hath not means sufficient to its end , the order and concord of its Body . Every particular Church ought to believe that it does not err in its definitions ; for it ought not to impose any known error upon its Members . But though it believes it does not err , it does not believe it upon this reason , because God hath made it an infallible Guide ; but rather for this , because it hath sincerely and with Gods assistance followed a rule which is infallible . And , upon this supposition , it imposeth Doctrines , and excludeth such as with contumacy dissent from them (a) 4. This Guide is not the present Church declaring to particular Christians the sense of the Church of former Ages . How can this declaration be made , seeing Churches differ , and each Church calls it self the true one , and pretendeth to the Primitive pattern . The Church of Rome hath , on her side , the suffrages of all the Councils and Fathers , the first , the middle the last , if Campian the Jesuite may be believed (b) On the other hand Monsieur Larroque hath Written a Book of the Conformity of the Protestant Churches in France with the Discipline of the Christian Ancient Church , taking it for granted that their Doctrine was Catholick . And we likewise pretend , both to the Doctrine and Discipline of it . All of us cannot be in the right . The Roman Church , without any proof , calleth her self the Church Catholick ; and she pretendeth to conveigh to us the sense of the Ancient Fathers and Councils ; which sense was that they understood formerly by the word Tradition . * And in this sense a Romanist said of Pope Honorius † , that he had broken the rule of Tradition . But how can we esteem that Church a faithful representer of the sense of the Ancients whilst the Reformed consult the Ancients with equal ability , and find a contrary sense in them ? Whilst the Church of Rome , * by a kind of Ecclesiastical Coinage , stampeth Divine Authority upon Books esteemed by the Councils and Fathers to be Apochryphal ? † Whilst it hath forged decrees of Popes , * and ( like a deceitful Gibeonite ) rendred that which was really new , in appearance old and mouldy , on purpose to promote imposture ? How doth it give us the sense of the Ancients , when it owneth what it formerly disowned as Canonical , the Epistle to the Hebrews † ? When it taketh away the Cup which Pope Gelasius called a grand Sacrilege * ? When it now rejecteth the Communicating of Infants which , in former times , was esteemed by many a very necessary point ? When a former Pope Gregory condemns the Title of Universal pastor as Anti-Christian , and a latter insists upon it as the choicest flour in the papal Prerogative ? When St. Austin (a) and from him the very Breviary (b) shall expound Christs promise , of being always with his Church , of the presence of his Divinity and of his Spirit , and not of his Body : And Pope Innocent the third shall interpret them as meant also of his corporal presence (c) ? And , if the Roman Church falsifyeth written Tradition , how shall we trust her for Oral ? And how and at what time did that Oral Tradition remove from Greece to Rome where the Greek Church , which it alloweth to have been once possessed of the true Tradition , is accused of Heresie ? At the same time ( I suppose ) that the Chappel of the Virgin removed from Nazareth to Loretto . This principle of Oral Tradition is most uncertain to their Judges ; and to those to whom they offer it , it is most obscure . It is a principle on which they can serve a purpose , in justifying novel Doctrines as Oral Traditions not known to any but the Roman Church , which pretendeth to the custody of them . 5. God hath not set up any one Person in the Catholick Church in the Quality of an unerring Guide in the Christian Faith. The Bishops of Rome who pretend to this Prerogative , do but pretend : It is a tender point ; and the Pope's Legates , in the Council of Trent , * were enjoyned to give forth this Advertisement , that the Fathers , upon no account whatsoever , should touch it , or dispute about it . They who examine it , will soon reject it as false and useless . And , 1. Whether the Pope be or be not the Guide , the Men of the Roman Communion are exposed to dangerous uncertainty . For , it is not yet determined amongst them , whether they are to follow the Pope , with , or without , or against a Council . Yet a Pope hath owned a Council which deposed other Popes , and by decree , set it self above them , or rather vindicated the superiority due to it . Thus Martin the fifth received the Papal Mitre from the Council of Constance , after it had deposed Gregory the twelfth , Benedict the thirteenth , and John the twenty third . Again , there have been , by the account given us in their own Historians , † more than twenty formed Schisms in that Church ; two or more Popes pretending at the same time to the infallible Chair , and each of them not being without their followers and giving Holy Orders . And at this time there is risen an Apologist * for Mauritius , Burdin or Gregory the eighth , though he was ejected by the Roman Church , which received Gelasius into his place ; Burdin being disliked by them as a Creature of Henry the Emperour . This Schism ( saith St. Bernard † ) distracted that Church and gave it a wound only not incurable . And Baluzius * professeth that it was then difficult to understand which of the two , Gregory or Gelasius , was the Legitimate successour of Pope Paschal . Now , how useless , to them , is the pretence of a Guide , when they want some other Guide who should tell them which of the pretenders they may securely follow ? Secondly , the Popes themselves , in their Solemn Profession , suppose themselves liable to the misleading of the People even in Matters of Faith. For , having owned the Faith of the Six general Councils , * They further profess themselves and others to be subject to an Anat●ema , if they advance novelty contrary to the aforesaid Evangelical Tradition , and the integrity of the Orthodox and Christian Faith. Thirdly , If the Pope challengeth this Power of infallible Guidance , he must lay claim to it by his succeeding of St. Peter in the Chair Apostolical . But , then , by equal reason , the successors of each Apostle may challenge the office of an infallible Guide . For the Power which Christ gave to St. Peter , he gave to the rest : It was not special . And , for the Bishops of Antioch who first succeeded St. Peter , they have a much fairer pretence than those of Rome . The Truth is , Hierusalem was properly the Mother-Church : Though Rome was the Imperial City ; and if , by this means , the Popes had not sate higher , they would not have pretended to see further than others . Fourthly , those who have considered the writings of many Popes , and the decrees made by them , have found no reason to lay their Faith at their Golden Sandal . It is manifest to every Learned Man that the Eyes of the Pope are not ( metaphorically ) like those of Augustus in which ( it is said ) there appeared a brightness like that of the Sun. If we had more of their History , and more of their Writings , we should find more of their errors . They have shewed both ignorance and extravagance in opinion , and error in the Faith it self . There are not , perhaps , weaker or more absurd passages in any Ecclesiastical Writer , than we may find in the works of Pope Innocent the third , who was called the Wonder of the World * . He saith of Subdeacons that they represented the Nethinims † ( or Nathinnims as he calls them ; ) and that Nathaniel was one of that Order . * That the Pope does not use a Pastoral rod , because St. Peter sent his Staff to Eucharius the first Bishop of Treves , to whom Maternus succeeded , who , by the same Staff , was raised from the dead . † That the People have seven Salvations in the Mass , in order to the expelling the seven deadly Sins , and receiving the seven fold Grace of God. * That an Epistle , signifying in Greek an Over-sending or supererogation , the word agrees very well to the Apostolical Epistles , which are superadded to the Gospel (a) He allots to each Article of the Apostolical and Constantinopolitan Creeds , a particular Apostle , and finds the mystery in all things that are twelve in number . For example sake , in the twelve loaves of Shew-Bread ; in the twelve Tribes ; twelve hours , twelve Months . He gives this reason why Water is by the Bishop mixed with Wine in the Holy Chalice ; because it is said in the Revelation , that many Waters signify many People , and that Christ shed his Blood for the People (b) He saith that Judas was not at the Sacrament (c) because he was not to drink it new with Christ in his Kingdom , which priviledge he had promised to all the partakers . He teacheth that Mice eat only the Shews of Consecrated Bread (d) He professeth rather to venerate Sacraments than to prie into them (e) because it is written in Exodus the twelfth , concerning the Paschal Lamb , Eat not of it raw , nor sodden at all with Water , but rost with Fire . I have not narrowly ransacked the plaits of the Popes Vestments , for this is obvious enough ; and so were a great many other sayings of equal weakness ; but I am weary of the folly of them . There have been other Popes , also , injudicious even to duncery . Eugenius the third approved of the Prophesies or Enthusiastick Dreams of Hildegardis , in the Synod of Tryers , as Inspirations . Pope Zachary judged the true Doctrine of Antipodes , to be heretical in the case of the more Learned and Knowing Virgilius (a) Herein the Pope committed a greater error than the poor Priest who Baptized in nomina Patria & filia & Spiritûs Sancta (b) and whose lack of Latin Boniface the German Apostle would have punished by the Rebaptization of his Proselytes , if the said Virgilius had not , by application to that Pope , prevented it . It is true , Virgilius was accused as an Heretick who had set up another Sun and another Moon , as well as another World of Men whose feet were opposite to ours . But Velserus himself (c) hath the ingenuity to confess that this was meant only of the Sun and Moon as shining to our Antipodes , as well as to us : And that the accusation was framed by ignorant Men who had not the acuteness to understand the Globular form of the Earth , and the scheme of the proposer . Neither had Pope Zachary himself sagacity enough to discern the nature of this ridiculous charge . He who can mistake Truth for Heresie , may mistake Heresie for Truth . Now that Popes have erred not only in lesser things , but even in Matters of Faith , is plain from History . I will instance , only , in Vigilius , and Honorius , for-bearing to speak of Liberius and divers others who swerved from the truly Ancient Catholick Faith. Pope Vigilius framed a Constitution in favour of the three Chapters or Nestorian-Writings of Ibas Bishop of Edessa , Theodorus of Mopsuestia , and Theodoret Bishop of Cyrus . This Constitution was published by Cardinal Baronius † out of Ancient Manuscript in the Vatican Library : And he calls it a Decree * in defence of these Chapters . In this Decree the Pope doth not only justify these Heretical Writings , but , with the Followers of Theodorus , he falsly chargeth upon the Council of Chalcedon the Epistle of Ibas * , and calls it Orthodox . This charge the Fathers of the fifth general Council (a) shew to be unjust and false . That Council condemneth those three Chapters as Heretical . And , together with them , it condemneth (b) Pope Vigilius and others under the name of Sequaces or Followers of Nestorius and Theodorus . Baronius himself acknowledgeth that the decree of that Council was set up against the decree of that Pope (c) These Chapters had not been condemned if they had not contained in them the Nestorian-Heresie . The Epistle of Ib●● does , in particular manner , extoll The d●r●● . And the Council affirmeth concerning his Creed , that the Father of lies composed it . And it denounceth a ●●rse against both the Composer and the Believers of it . Yet doubtless , these writings were , in themselves , inconsiderable enough . But the Council opposed them with such rigour , because the Faction had made them very popular , and advanced them into the Quality of a kind of Bible of the Party . For Pope Honorius , he fell into the Heresie of the Monothelites . * That is , of those who held that there is but one Will in both the Natures of Christ. This Doctrine he published in his Epistles . This he declared in the sixth general Council † he is , in the seventh Council * condemned as a Monothelite . And he was expressly anathematized for Confirming the Wicked Doctrine of Sergius . The guilt of Heresie in Honorius , is owned in the Solemn Profession of Faith made by the Popes at their entrance on the Papacy (a) This matter is so manifest that Melchior Canus (b) professeth , no Sophistry is artful enough to put the Colour of a plausible defence upon it . A late Romanist hath undertaken to write the History of the Monothelites (c) ; and the Defence of Honorius seemeth to be the principal motive to that undertaking . Yet so great is the power of Truth , and such , in this case is the plainness of it , that , in the Apologist himself , we find these concessions : That the Pope (a) was condemned by the Council , and that the Council was not to be blamed † ; that Pope Leo the second owned both the Council and the Sentence , and that Honorius was Sentenced as an Heretick . * He would abate this guilt by saying (b) that Honorius erred as a private Person , and not as Head of the Church , because his Epistle was hortatory , and not compulsive . It is true , he erred not as Head of the Church , for such he was not , neither as such was he owned . But he erred as a publick person and with Heretical obstinacy . For Pope Leo , as he noteth , said concerning him , that he had made it his business to betray and subvert the Holy Faith. (c) Now this matter of Fact sufficeth for the refuting all the fallacious reasonings of the patrons of Papal infallibility . For all must agree that they are not unerring Guides who actually err . The Sieur de Balzac (d) mocks at the weakness of one of the Romish Fathers who offered four reasons to prove that the Duke D' Espernon was not returned out of England : And offered them to a Gentleman who had seen him since his return . There seemeth no sitness in the constituting of such a Guide ; nor any necessity for it . Had it been agreeable to Gods Wisdom , his Wisdom would not have been wanting to it self . God having made Man a Reasonable Creature , would not make void the use of deliberation , and the freedom of his judgment . There is no vertue in the Assent , where the Eye is forced open , and the Light held directly to it . It is enough that God ▪ the rewarder of them who believe , hath given Men sufficient faculties , and sufficient means . And , seeing Holiness is as necessary to the pleasing of God , and to the peace of the World , as Union in Doctrine ( to which there is too frequently given a lifeless Assent ; ) seeing there must be Christian Obedience as long as there is a Church ; seeing ( as the Guide in Controversy * himself urgeth ) the Catholick Church and all the parts of it are believed , in the Creed , to be Holy as well as Orthodox ; We ask not the Romanists an impertinent Question when we desire them to tell us , why a means to infallibility in the judgment , rather than irresistibleness in the pious choice of the Will , is to be , by Heaven , provided in the Church ? Both seem a kind of Destination of equal necessity . But , though the Reformed , especially those of the Church of England , see no necessity for an infallible Guide , nor believe there is one on the face of the Earth , yet they do not reject all Ecclesiastical Guidance ; but allow it great place in matters of Discipline and Order ; and some place also ( though not that of an unerring Judge ) in Matters of Faith. At the beginning of the Reformation the Protestants , though they refused the judgment of the Pope their Enemy , yet they declined not the determination of a Council . And , in the Assembly at Ausburgh , the Romanists and Protestants agreed in a Council as the Umpire of their publick difference . At this the Pope was so alarumed ( saith the Sieur de Mezeray * ) that he wrote to the Kings of France and England , that he would do all they would desire , provided they hindred the calling of a Council . In the Reformation of the Church of England great regard was had to the Primitive Fathers and Councils . And the aforesaid French Historian was as much mistaken in the affairs of Our Church , when he said of our Religion , that it was a medly of the Opinions of Calvin and Luther (a,) as he was afterwards in the affairs of our State , when he said King James was elected at the Guild-hall King of England (b.) The Romannists represent us very falsly , whilst they fix upon us a private Spirit , as it stands in opposition to the Authority of the Catholick Church . Mr. Alabaster (c) expresseth one motive to his conversion to the Roman Church in these Words : Weigh together the Spouse of Christ , with Luther , Calvin , Melancthon : Oecumenical Councils with private opinions . The Reverend and Learned Fathers with Arius , Aetius , Vigilantius , Men always in their time Burned for Hereticks [ of which words , the former are false reasoning , the latter are false History . ] The Bishop of Meaux (d) reasons after the same fallacious manner , Supposing a Protestant to be of this perswasion that he can understand the Scriptures better than all the rest of the Church together , of which perswasion he saith very truly , that it exalteth Pride , and removeth Docility . The Guide in Controversies (d) puts the Question wrong in these terms . Whether a Protestant , in refusing the submission of his judgment to the Authority or Infallibility of the Catholick Church in her Councils , can have , in several Articles of necessary Faith , wherein the sense of Scripture is controverted , as sure a Foundation of his Faith , as he who submits his judgment to the foresaid Authority , or also Infallibility ? Here the Catholick Church is put in place of the Roman , Authority and Infallibility are joyned together ; and it is suggested dishonestly concerning the Reformed , that they lay aside the Authority of the Catholick Church in her general Councils . Authority may be owned where there is no infallibility ; for it is not in Parents Natural or Civil : Yet both teach and govern us . If others reject Church-Authority , let them who are guilty of such disorderly irreverence , see to it . The Christians of the Church of England are of another Spirit . Of that Church this is one of the Articles : The Church hath power to decree Rites and Ceremonies , and Authority in Controversies of Faith. There is a Question ( saith Mr. Selden * ) about that Article concerning the power of the Church , whether these words [ of having power in Controversies of Faith ] were not stolen in . But , it 's most certain , they were in the Book of Articles that was confirmed ; though , in some Editions , they have been left out . They were so in Dr. Mocket's † ; but he is to be considered in that Edition as a private Man. Now this Article does not make the Church an infallible Guide in the Articles of Faith , but a Moderator in the Controversies about Faith. The Church doth not assume that Authority to it self in this Article which , in the foregoing * , it denied to the Churches of Jerusalem , Alexandria , Antioch and Rome . When perverse Men will raise such Controversies , who is so fit , for Peace sake , to interpose , as that Church where the Flame is kindled ? There can be no Church without a Creed ; and each particular Church ought to believe her Creed to be true , and , by consequence , must exercise her Authority in the defence of presumed Truth . Otherwise she is not true to her own constitution . But still she acts under the caution given by St. Augustine . (a) You bind a Man on Earth : Take heed they be just bonds in which you retain him . For Justice will break such as are unjust in sunder . And whilest the Church of England challengeth this Authority , she doth not pretend to it from any supernatural gift of infallibility , but so far only as she believes she hath sincerely followed an infallible Rule . For of this importance are the next words of the Article before remembred . — It is not Lawful for the Church to ordain any thing that is contrary to Gods word written . — And besides the same it ought not to enforce any thing to be believed for necessity of Salvation (b.) After this manner the Church of England asserteth her own Authority ; and she runs not into any extream about the Authority of Councils , or the Catholick Church . We make Confession of the Ancient Faith expressed in the Apostolical , Nicene , or Constantinopolitan and Athanasian Creeds . The Canons of forty reject the Heresie of Socinus as contrary to the first four general Councils (c.) Our very Statute-Book hath respect to them in the adjudging of Heresie . (d) Yet our Church still teacheth concerning them (e) , that things by them ordained have neither Strength nor Authority , unless it may be declared that they be taken out of Holy Scripture . When Controversies arise , especially when the doubts concern not so much the Article of Faith it self , as the Modes of it , we grant to such venerable Assemblies a Potiority of Judgment . Or if we assent not , yet for Peace sake we are humbly silent : We do not altogether refuse their Umpirage . We think their Definitions good Arguments against unquiet Men who are chiefly moved by Authority . We believe them very useful in the Controversies betwixt us and the Church of Rome ; and as often as they appeal to Primitive Fathers and Councils ; to Fathers and Councils we are willing to go with them , and to be tryed by those who were nigher to the Apostles , in the Quality of Witnesses rather than Judges . We believe that in matters of Truth of which we are already well perswaded , there may be added by the Suffrages of Councils and Fathers , a degree of Corroboration to our Assent . In sum we say with S. Aust●ne * that there is of Councils in the Church of God a most wholesome [ though not an infallible ] Authority . And if S. Gregory Naz●anzen never saw ( as he saith ) a happy effect of any Synod , (a) this came not to pass from the Nature of the means as not conducive to that end , but from the looseness of Government , and the depraved manners of the Age in which he lived : For such were the times of Valens the Emperour . It is true , there are some among us , though not of us , who , with disdainful insolence , contemn all Authority ; even that of the Sacred Scripture it self . These pretend to an infallible Light of immediate and personal Revelation . It hath hapned according to the Proverb , every Man of them hath a Pope within him . Henry Nicholas puffed up many vain ignorant people with this Proud Imagination . Hetherington a Mechanick , about the end of the Reign of King James , advanced this notion of Personal Infallibility . His followers believed they could not err in giving deliberate Sentence in Religion (a) And this was the principle of Wynstanley and the first Quakers , though the Leaders , since they were embodied , have in part forsaken it . But these Enthusiasts have intituled the Holy Spirit of God to their own Dreams . They have pretended to Revelations which are contrary to one another . They can be Guides to themselves only , because they cannot by any supernatural sign prove to others that they are inspired . And such Enthusiasm is not otherwise favoured in the Church of England then by Christian pity , in consideration of the infirmity of Humane Nature ; but in the Church of Rome , it hath been favoured to that Degree , that it hath founded many Orders and Religious Houses , and given Reputation to some Doctrines , and canoniz'd not a few Saints amongst them . The Inspiration of S. Hildegardis , S. Catharine of Siena , S. Teresa , and many others seemeth to have been vapour making impression on a devout fancy : Yet the Church of Rome in a Council under Leo the Tenth , hath too much encouraged such distemper as prophesie * . For private Reason , it is the handmaid of Faith ; we use it , and not seperately from the Authority of the Church , but as a help in distinguishing true from false Authority . And in so plain a case as Heresie , if our Church thinketh a private Man may without an infallible Guide on Earth judge aright of it , it does but believe as Pope Adrian believed , as he professed in a Synod at Rome , of which profession report is made in the second Synod of Nice † For , speaking of the Sentence against Pope Honorius , he excuseth it in point of good behaviour , because it was given in the case of Heresie . For in that case , and in that case alone , he allowed Inferiors ( so he was pleased to call the Oriental Bishops ) to reject the corrupt sense of those who are superior to them . I will hasten to the next Proposition , after I have added one thing more which relates to the guidance of Ecclesiastical Authority : And it is this . Those of the Unlearned Laity who are Members of the Church of England , have much more of the just guidance of Ecclesiastical Authority than the like order of Men in the Church of Rome . For the Authentick Books of that Church being all written in the Latin Tongue , the illiterate People resolve their Faith into the ability and honesty of their Confessor or Parish Priest. They take it upon his word , that this is the Doctrine , this the Discipline , this the Worship , of their Church . Whereas each Minister in our Church can direct the People to the Holy Bible , to the Books of Homilies , Articles , Canons , Common-Prayer , Ordination , as set forth in their native Tongue , by publick Authority . Of this they may be assured by their own Eyes , as many as can but competently read . They do not only take this from the mouth of a Priest , but from the Church it self . Where the Laws of the Church and the Statutes of the Civil Government are written in an unknown Tongue , there the Unlearned depend more upon private than publick Authority ; for they receive the Law from particular Priests or Judges . Though Ecclesiastical Authority be a help to our Faith , yet the Holy Scripture is the only infallible Rule of it ; and by this Rule and the Ministerial Aids of the Christian Church , we have sufficient means without Submission to papal . Infallibility , to attain to certainty in that Faith which is generally necessary to Salvation . I do not mean that , by believing the whole Canon of the Scripture in the gross , we thereby believe all the necessary Articles of the Faith , because they are therein contained . That looks too like a fallacy ; and it giveth countenance to an useless Faith. For he that believes on this manner , hath as it were swallow'd a Creed in the lump only , whereas it is necessary for a Christian to know each particular Article and the general Nature and Tendency of it . Otherwise his Faith will not have a distinct influence upon his Christian behaviour to which if it were not useful , it were not necessary . To believe in general as the Scripture believes , is with the Blind and Flexible Faith of a Romanist , to believe at adventure . He believes as his Church believes , but he knows not what is the belief of his Church ; and therefore is not instructed by that Faith to behave himself as a Member of it . The Scripture is that rule of Faith which giveth us all the particular Articles which are necessary to eternal Life . By this rule the Primitive Fathers govern'd themselves , and this they commended to the Churches . And Clemens Alexandrinus (a) does in terms , call the Consent of the Old and New Testament the Ecclesiastical Canon , and the Touchstone of true and false . I will not multiply Testimonies ; enough of them are already collected (b) . I will rather pursue the Argument before me , in these three Assertions . First , a Protestant without the submission of his Judgment to the Roman Church , may be certainly directed to the Canonical Books of Holy Scripture . Secondly , He may without such submission , sufficiently understand the Rule of Faith , and find out the Sense of such places in those Canonical Books , as is necessary to the belief of a true Christian. Thirdly , This rule of Faith is the principal means of Union in Faith in the Christian Church . First , a Protestant without the submission of his Judgment to the Roman Church may be certainly directed to the Holy Scriptures . It is commonly said by Men of the Roman perswasion , but injudiciously enough , that we may as well receive our Creed from them , as we do our Bible . The Scribes and Pharisees might have said the like to the People of the Jews . But with the good Text , they conveighed down to them a very false gloss , and misinterpreted the Prophesies , as meant of a pompous temporal Messiah . But , for the Reformed , they have received neither Creed nor Bible from the Church of Rome . The first enumeration of those Books they find in the Apostolical Canons , and in those of the Council of Laodicea ; no Western writings . They have received the Scriptures from the Universal Church of all Ages and Places , the Copies of them having been as widely dispersed as the Christians themselves . And they receive them not from the infallibility of any particular Church , but upon the validity of this sure principle , that all the Christian World , so widely dispersed , could not possibly conspire in the imposing of false Books upon them . For particular Churches , we may , of all others suspect the Roman , in reference to the Scriptures . For what sincerity of dealing may we hope for from such a Cabal of Men as has forged decrees of Councils and Popes , obtruded upon the World Apocryphal Books as Books Canonical , purged out of the writings of the Fathers such places as were contrary to their Innovations , depressed the Originals under an imperfect Latin Copy , and left on purpose in that Copy , some places uncorrected for the serving of turns . For example sake , they have not either in the Bible of Sixtus , or in that of Clement ( both which , though in War against each other , are made their Canon ) changed the word [ She ] in the third of Genesis , (a) for [ That , or , He. ] But , contrary to the Hebrew Text , to the Translation of the Seventy , to the Readings of the Fathers , they persist in rendring of it after this manner ; She shall break thy Head. They believe this Reading tendeth most to the Honor of the blessed Virgin , whom they are too much inclined to exalt , in the Quality of a Mother , above her Son. The English Translation of Doway hath followed this plain and partial corruption . Secondly , A Protestant may without Submission of his judgment to the Roman Church , find out , in the Books of Holy Scripture , the necessary Articles of Christian Faith. Two things are here supposed ; and both of them are true . First , That the Scriptures contain in them all the necessary Articles of our Faith. Secondly , That the sense of the Words in which these Articles are expressed in Scripture may be found out by a Protestant , without the Submission of his judgment to the Papacy . First , The Scriptures contain in them all the necessary Articles of the Faith. This is true , if the Scriptures themselves be so : For this they Witness * St. Paul (b) saith of the Old Testament , as expounded of Christ , that it was able to make a Man wise unto Salvation . Much more may this be affirmed of the entire Canon . The Apostles preached the necessaries to Salvation , and what they had preached they wrote down * concerning the manner of it , Eusebius may be consulted † . For the Primitive Fathers , they allowed the Scriptures to be a sufficient Rule . Irenaeus said of them they were perfect * ; and of the words of St. Austine this is the sense ; Among those things which are plainly set down in Scrpture , all those things are to be found which comprehend Faith and Good Manners . Nay , the Romanists themselves attempt to prove their very additional Articles out of the Bible . That there are in it the Articles of the Apostolical Creed , is evident enough to a common Reader . But how the Romish Articles should be found in that Bible which was written some hundreds of years before they were invented , is a riddle beyond the skill of Apollo . Secondly , the sense of the Scriptures , in matters necessary to Salvation , may be found out by Men of the Reformed Religion , without Submission to Roman Infallibility . The Learned know the Originals , and the true ways of Interpretation . And amongst us , those of the Episcopal Clergy have obliged the World with such an Edition of the Bible in many Languages as was not before extant in the Roman Church . And a Romanist who writes with great mastery in such matters , prefers it before the great Bible of Paris (a.) For those of the Laity who are Unlearned , they have before them a Translation which errs not in the Faith. And the phrases are not so obscure , but that , by study and Ministerial helps , they may understand them . They have , before them , a Translation which errs not in the Faith. Of this the Italians and French may be convinced by comparing the Translations of James de Voragine , and the Divines of Lovain with those of Signior Diodati , and Olivetan or Calvin . And the English may receive satisfaction in this matter by comparing their Translation with that of Doway . In all of them they will find the same Fundamental Doctrines of Faith. And were there any such material alteration made in our Bible , it would appear by the notorious inconsistence of one part of the Canon with another : It would have been , long ago , detected , and exposed to publick shame , both by the Romanists and the other Dissenters from our Communion . But the former are not able to produce one instance ; and the latter agree with us in the use and excellence of the Translation , though in other things , they extreamly differ from us : And where they do but dream we err they forbear not to proclaim it . In so much that a difference in the Translations of the Psalter which concerns not Faith or Manners † and a supposed defect in the Table for keeping Easter have been made by them publick Objections * and stumbling blocks in the way to their Conformity . It is true , there is a Romanist who hath raved against the Bible of the Reformed , in these extravagant words (a;) The Sectaries have as many different Bibles , in Canon , Version , and sense , as are days in the year . — The Sectarian Bible is no more the Word of God then the Alcoran , Almanack , or Aesops Fables . Of great corruption he speaks in general , but his madness has admitted of so much caution , that he forbears the mention of any one particular place . The Learned Romanists understand much better , and the Ingenuous Will confess it . And they are not ignorant that we Translate from the Original Tongues , after having compared the Readings of the most Ancient Copies , and of the Fathers : Whilst they Translate the Bible from the Vulgar Latin , which , indeed , in the New Testament is a tolerable , but in the Old , a very imperfect Version . If our English Bible were turned into any one of the Modern Tongues by a Judicious Romanist who could keep Council , it would pass amongst many of that Church for a good Catholick Translation . And this is , the rather , my perswasion , because I have read , in Father Simon (a,) that not unpleasant story concerning the Translation of Mr. René Benoist a Doctor of the Faculty of Paris . This Doctor had observed that a new Latin Translation of the Organon of Aristotle , performed by a person who understood not the Greek Tongue , had been very well received : Upon this occasion he was moved to turn the Bible into the French Tongue , though he was ignorant of those of the Greek and Hebrew . For the accomplishing of this Design , he served himself upon the French Translation of Geneva ; changing only a few words , and putting others of the same signification in their room . But , it seems , he was not exact enough in this change of words . For he having over-looked some words which were used by the Genevians and not the Romanists , a discovery was made by the Divines of Paris , and this Edition of the Bible was condemned by them , though published under the name of one of their Brethren . I do not say that such places of Scripture as contain Matters of Faith , are plain to every Man. But those who have a competence of capacity , who are not prejudiced against the Truth , who pray to God for his assistance , who attend to what they read , who use the Ministerial helps which are offered to them , shall find enough in Holy Writ to Guide them to everlasting life . In finding out the sense of the Scriptures , the Church gives them help , but it does not , by its Authority , obtrude the sense upon them . The Guides of it are as Expositors and School-Masters to them : And by comparing phrase with phrase , and place with place , and by other such ways , they teach them how to judge of the meaning themselves . They give them light into the nature of the Doctrine , they do not require them to take it upon trust . They endeavour to open their understandings that they may , themselves , understand the Scriptures . And if they cannot themselves understand the Doctrine , it will be of little use to them in their lives . For they then believe in general that it is a necessary Truth ; but what Truth it is or for what ends it is necessary , they apprehend not . A Foolish Master in the Mathematicks may require his Schollars to take it upon his word that a Problem is demonstrated : But a wise and useful teacher will give them light into the manner of the demonstration , in such sort , that they themselves shall at last be able to judge that it is truly performed : And till they can do this , they are not instructed . St. Hierom relates it in praise of Marcella a Roman Lady (a,) that she would not receive any thing from him after the Pythagorean manner , or upon bare Authority . She would , with such care examine all things , that She seemed to him , not so much his Schollar as his Judge . It is certain that there are great depths and obscure Mysteries in the Holy Bible . But the Doctrines of Christian Faith are , to the sincere and industrious and such as wait on God in the way of the Reformed Church , sufficiently plain . But to the Idle , the prejudiced , the captious , Light it self is Darkness . The Romanists affright with this pretence of obscurity and profoundness ; as if we must not adventure into any part of the Waters , because in some places , we may go beyond our depth . If there are hard and difficult places which the Vnstable wrest ; who required their meanness to make a judgment of that for which they might perceive themselves to be insufficient ? But whilst St. Peter speaketh of some few places in St. Paul's writings which are obscure , he does , at the same time , suppose many others to be plain enough for the capacities of the Unlearned . And if they be evil Men , though very Learned , they will wrest the plainest places ; and ( as some did in St. Hieroms * days ) they will draw violently to their private sense a Text of Scripture which is incongruously , and with relectance applied to it . It is true all Sects of Christians cite the Scriptures ; but that does not prove the obscurity of those Sacred writings : It rather shews the Partiality , Boldness , and Sophistry of those who alledge them . All Laws are obscure if this Argument hath force in it . For every Man , in his own case , has the Law on his side . Men take up their opinions and Heresies from other reasons ; and then , because the name of Scripture is venerable , they rake into the several Books of it , and they bend and torture places , and force them on their side by unnatural construction . So do the Socinians , producing all the niceties of Grammar and Criticism in a matter of Faith. Yet the Guide in Controversies (a) useth it as an Argument against the plainness of this Rule of Faith , that the Socinians cite the Holy Scriptures in favour of their Heresie . But is not this Argument two-edged ? And will it not cut as well on the other side , and do Execution against the words , of Fathers and Councils , and the Apostolical Creed it self ? For the Socinians ( those especially who are turned Arians ) since Petavius hath furnished them with Quotations , will cite the writings of the Ancients : And Slichtingius , a mere Socinian , * hath expounded every Article of the Creed in a sense agreeable to the Heresie of his Master . But , if the Scriptures were so obscure in necessary matters , what remedy would be administred by the Roman Church ? They cannot offer to us any Ancient ; infallible exposition . What the Antients have said , the Reformed generally understand much better then Popes , amongst whom there have been some who could scarce read the Holy Gospel in Latin. For the Fathers of the earliest Ages , they were more busied in writing against Heresies , then in explaining of Scriptures . Nor , to this day hath the Roman Church , given any Authentick Collection of Expositions , either of the Ancients or of her own . And if we must go to any Church for a comment on the Scriptures , let the Roman be one of our last Refuges . For it is manifest that the Key the Papalins use , is the Worldly Polity of that Church . And as they like , so they interpret . Had not they governed themselves by this art , we should not have found in the writings of their Popes , and in the very Canon Law it self , those words which were spoken to Jeremiah expounded of the Supremacy of the Bishop of Rome (a) I have set thee over Kings , to root out , to pluck up , and to destroy . (b) The Donatists found their Church in these words of the Canticles , Tell me ( thou whom my Soul loveth ) where thou feedest ; where thou makest thy Flock to rest at noon . For they expounded this ( as it liked them best ) of the Flock of their party in the Southern Country of Africa . Such Expounders of Scripture are those Popish Writers , who interpret [ Feed my Sheep ] of the Universal Monarchy of the Bishop of Rome , and conclude that a Pastor must drive away Wolves or depose Princes hurtful to the Church . But the straining of such Metaphorical expressions ( as an excellent Person * saith ) proves only that they want better proofs . And , by a like way of interpretation , from the same Text it might be concluded that all Christians are Fools , because Sheep are silly Creatures . No expositions are more besides the sense of the Text , or more ridiculous , then some of those which may be found in the Authentick Books of the Roman Church . And those who composed them appear to have looked asquint on the Scriptures . For whilst they looked on them , they seem to have looked another way . I will instance only in a few of those many absurd expositions , with which the Roman Breviary abounds . The words of the Angel to the Holy Virgin [ a Sword shall go through thine own Soul also ] are (a) interpreted of that word of God which is quick and powerful , and sharper then any two-edged Sword. And this sense is designed as an evasion of their reasoning , who from that Text , conclude concerning the blessed Virgin , that she died , and was not miraculously assumed . The Ascension of Elias is thus expounded . (b) He was taken up into the aerial , not the aetherial , Heavens ; from whence he was dropped in an obscure place on Earth , there to remain to the end of the World , and then to expire with it . They say † of Job , That when he spake of a Bird , and of her path in the Air , he , by a figure , called Christ a Bird , and , by the motion of it in the Air , figured also our Lords Ascension . We may perceive , by these few Instances , what an entrance into the sense of Scripture is like to be given , whilst a Pope has the Key of Knowledge in his keeping . Thirdly , If Men would use the Church as their Ministerial Guide , and admit of the Scripture as the only Rule by which all Matters of Faith are to be measured , they would agree in the proper means to the blessed end of Unity in the Faith. This was the perswasion of St. Austin who thus applieth himself to Maximinus * ; Neither ought I at this time to alledge the Council of Nice , nor you that of Ariminum : For neither am I bound to the Authority of the one , nor you to that of the other . Let us both dispute with the Authorities of Scripture which are Witnesses common to both of us . Whilst the Romanists ascribe the differences which arise amongst the Reformed to their want of an infallible Guide , and to their different interpretations of the Scriptures , they unskilfully derive effects from causes which are not the natural Parents of them . There is ( saith St. Austine ) one Mother of all strifes , and she is Pride . Neither doth the Scripture divide us , nor does the infallibility of their judge unite them . Their Union ( such as it is ) ariseth from the mighty force of their External Polity ; and they speak not differently because they dare not ; and the strength of that Polity arose at first from Rome , not as the Chair of St. Peter but as the Seat of the Empire . Our divisions like theirs , arise ( as all Wars do , be they Ecclesiastical or Civil ) from the unruly Lusts and Passions of Men. And from these likewise , arise generally the misinterpretations of plain Laws , and Rules ; the sense of which must be made to chime according to the Interest of prejudiced Men , or else they will not give attention to them . If the Lusts and Passions of Men were mortified ; all Christians agreeing in the certainty of the Scriptures , though not of any Living Guide ; and the words of the one being as intelligible as those of the other : All might agree in one Creed , and put an end to those unnecessary Controversies which entangle Truth , and extinguish Charity . FINIS . Notes, typically marginal, from the original text Notes for div A64357-e1630 The Question . The moment of ●his Question . The Temptations to believe the Affirmative part of this Question . The true Resolution of the Query . Prop. I. * Nisi una est Fides , non est . L. M.Ser . 23. † See Ferrand . l. 1. c. 1. Sect. 4. disquis . Relig. * Acts 4.19 , 20. * S. Mat. 28.20 . Prop. II. * Jo● . 15.22 , 24. Prop. III. * To the Reader of the Dis. of Govern. of Church●s . * R. H. Guide in Controv. in Pref. p. 3. Prop. IV. Consid. I. * Isai. 56.10 . Jez . 2.8 . Ez. 7.26 . C. 22.26 . † M●l . 2.7 , 8. * Deut. 17.8 . to 12. See Levit. 4.13 . Consid. II. * S. Mat. 16.18 . † S. Mat. 28.20 . Revel . 3.1 , 2 , 3. * S. Luke 10.16 . † S. Luke 10.1 , 9. * Ver. 12. 1 Tim. 3.15 . † Ryc . of the Greek Ch. p. 44. * Revel . 3.12 . † In 1 Cor. 9.2 . — 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , &c. * S. Mat. 18.15 , 16 , 17. See Deut. 17.6 . * Launoy in Epist . ad Carol. magistrum ad Jacob. Bevil . ad . Guil. Voell . ad Raim . Formentinum in 5. par . Epist. Consid. III. * Joh. 20.21 . † S. Mat. 9.36 . C. 10.6 . 2. Pet. 5.2 . * S. Mat. 28.16 , 17 , 18 , 19. † S. Chrys. in 1 Cor. 9.2 . 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , &c. † See R. H. Guide in Controv . Dis. 1. p. 5. and Socin . in Loc. * S. Hil. de Trin. l. 6. dixit Petrus , Tu es filius Dei , &c. super hanc igitur Confessionis Petram Ecclesiae edificatio est v. Launoy in Epist ad Voellum . † Revel . 21.14 . Ephes. 2.20 . * Act. 2.14 , 41 , 47. IV. Consid. † Euseb. l. 3. vit . Const. c. 7. ▪ 8. p. 487. Socrat. E. H. l. c. 8. p. 19. * V. Concil . Lab● . Tom. 2. p. 50 , &c. † Socr. Eccl. Hist. l. 1. c. 6. p. 9. * From A. 1545. to A. 1563. † V. Council . Const. sess . 39. * V. Greg. magn . Ep. 6.31 . Leo. 1. Ep. 53. Gelas . 1. Ep. 13. † Concil . Labb . Tom. 10. p. 23 , 379. & Pontific . Roman . (a) A. D. 1542. in Coll. Sorb . See Richer . H. Conc. general . vol. 4. p. 162 , 163 , &c. Object . * R.H. Annot. on D. Still . Answer . p. 82 , 83. † Art. 31. Ch. 5. du consistoire . si un ou plusieurs , &c. * Syn. Dord . sess . 138. Answer . (a) See Artic. 20 , 21 , 22. (b) Camp. Rat. 3. p. 180. Rat. 5. p. 185. * Lib. diurn . Pontif. p. 35. etenim hujus Apostolicae Traditionis normam quam venerandam Sanctorum 318. Patrum Con●ilium quod in Nicaea , &c. & p. 43. hujusmodi Evangelicam Traditionem . † Ant. Dezallier in Histor. Monoth . p. 123. * Conc. Trid. Sess. 4. decr . 1. † V. constit . Apost . can . Apost . conc . Laod. conc . Nic. 1. S. Hieron . Prolog . &c. Euseb . E. H. l. 4. c. 26. p. 149. Cron. l. 2. &c. * V. Blondelli Pseudo-Isodorum . † V. S. Hieron . in Isai. c. 6.8 . * Gratian in de Consecr . dist . 2. cap. 2. (a) S. Aug. tract . 30. in Job . & tract . 50. (b) Brev. Rom. Dom. infra . oct . Asc. 3. noct . lect . 7. p. 440. (c) Innoc. 3. Myst. miss . l. 4. p. 196. * H. Conc. Trid. l. 2. Arg. I. † See the Index of Onuphrii , vit . Pontif. ed. Colon. 1610. * Steph. Baluz . in miscellan . l. 3. p. 471. to 514. † S. Bern. Ep. 219. * Baluz . ibid. p. 514. difficile tum erat , &c. Arg. II. * Lib. diurn . Pontif. 2. professio fidei . p. 43. — Vndè & districti Anathematis interdictioni subjicimus , si quis unquam , se● n●s , sive est Al●us , qui novum aliquid praesumat contra bujusin●di Evangel●cam Traditionem , & Orthodox●efid●i , Christianaeque Religionis integritatem , &c. Arg. III. Arg. IV. * Mat. par . A. 1217. stupor mundi . † Ezra . 8.20 . * Innoc. 3. Myst. missae l. 1. c. 2. fol. 158. † Innoc. 3. ibid. c. 62. fol. 165. * Ibid. l. 2. c. 24. fol. 170. (a) Ibid. c. 29. fol. 171. (b) Ibid. c. 58. fol. 177. (c) Ibid. l. 4. c. 13. fol. 189. (d) Ibid. c. 16. fol. 190. (e) Ibid. c. 19. (a) Epist. Zach. p. ad Bonifac. inter op . M. Velseri . in l. 5. Rer. Boic . p. 148. de perversa autem [ Virgilii ] Doctrinâ , quam contra dominum & animam suam locmutus est , quod scil . alius mundus & alii homines sub terrâ sint , ali●squeSol & Luna , si convictus fuerit ita consiteri , hunc accito Concilio ab Ecclesiâ pelle Sacerdotii honore privatum . (b) Velser . op . Ibid. p. 147. (c) Vels . Ibid. p. 149. † Baron . Annal . A. 553. N. 48. ed. Colon. p. 486. * Id. Ibid. N. 218. p. 419. * Id. An. 553. N. 192. p. 511. (a) Conc. Constant . 2. Collat . 6. (b) Defin. Conc. col . 8. (c) Baron . Annal . 553. N. 212. p. 417. — Act. mque est ( ut apparet ) adversus Vigihi constitutum , licet pre reverentà ipsum non nominaverint . * Dezall . Hist. mon. scrut . 5. p. 192 , 193. Altera phrasis Honoriana longè dificilior , munimè tamen dissimulanda , ea est , quod dicat apertè . Unde & unam voluntatem fatemur dom . nostri Jesu Christi . † Syn. 6. act . 13. See Richer . Hist. Conc. General . vol. 1. p. 569. &c. * Syn. 7. Act. ult . p. 886. Con. in Labb . Richer . H. Conc. Gen. vol. 1. p. 658. Ad calc . ejusd . Act. 7. in ●mn . editionibus Concil . legitur Epist. Synod . quam Tarasius , &c. — Et diserte narrat cunctos Patres — Honorium damnasse . (a) Lib. diurn . Pontif. Conf. fid . 2. p. 41. Autores verò novi haeretici dogmatis , Sergion , Pyrrhum , Paulum , & Petrum Episcopos , unà cum Honorio ( qui pravis corum assertionibus fomentum impendit ) pariterque & Theodorum Pharamitanum , & Cyrum Alexandrinum , cum eorum imitatoribus , &c. (b) Melch. Can. Loci com . l. 6. c. ult . p. 242 , 243. &c. (c) Anton. Dezallier . Hist. Mon. Par. 1678. (a) Id. ib. p. 224 , 225 , 226. † 218. * Id. p. 220. (b) P. 207 , 208. (c) Id. p. 122. profanâ proditione immaculatam fidem subvertere conatus est . — Flammam confovit , p. 123. (d) Socr. 〈◊〉 . p. 4●0 . C●●●id . V. * R. H. Annot. on D. St. Answ. p. 81. Prop. V. * Hist. Fran. A. 1530. (a,) Mez. Hist. A. 1548. (b.) Id. ib. A. 1603. (c) See I. Racsters 7 motives of W. A. p. 11 , 12. (d) Confer . avec M. Claude . p. 110. (d) R. H. Annot . on D. St. Answ. p. 84. Art. 20. * Mr. Selden in his Colloquies ; a Ms. in the word Church . Sect. 5. † Doctr. & Polit . Eccl. Ang● . A. 1617. p. 129. * Artic. 19. (a) S. Aug. d● verb. Dom. super Mat. Ser. 16. (b.) Art. 20. (c.) Can. 5. (d) 1 Eliz. 1. Sect. 36. (e) Art. 21. * Ep. 118. Concil . in Eccl. Dei saluberrimam esse Authoritatem . (a) Greg. Naz. Ep. 42 , ad Procopium . (a) See D. Dennisons white wolf . * Conc. Lat. sess . 11. A. 1516. inter Labb . Conc. Max. p. 291. Caeterùm si quibusdam eorum Dominus futura quaedam in Dei Ecclesia inspiratione quapiam revelaverit , ut per Amos prophetam ipse promittit , & Paulus Ap. praedicatorum princeps Spiritum , inquit , nolite extinguere , prophetas nolite spernere , hos aliorum fabulosorum & mendaciumgregi connumerari vel aliter impediri minime , volumus . † Syn. Nic. 2. Art. 7. sec. vers . Anastasii . Licet enim Honorio post mortem Anathema sit dictum ab Orientalibus , sciendum tamen est quia fuerat super haeresi accusatus , propter quam solam licitum est minoribus majorum suorum moribus resistendi , vel pravos sensus liberè respuendi , &c. Prop. VI. (a) Cl. Alex. Strom. 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , &c. & Strom. 7. — 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . (b) V. Davenant . de Judice & norm● fidei . c. 12. p. 53. &c. D. Till . Rule of Faith. part . 4. sect . 2. p. 320. &c. Assert . I. (a) Gen. 3.15 . Assert . II. * See S. Joh. 20.30 , 31. C. 21.25 . (b) 2 Tim. 3.15 , 16 , 17. * Iren. l. 3. c. 1. † Eus. Hist. Eccl. l. 2. c. 14. * Iren. l. 2. c. 47. S. Aug. de doct . Christ. l. 2. c. 9. (a.) V. P. S. p. Hist. Critique . p. — Mais elle est 583. plus ample & plus commode ; &c. † See Hook. Eccl. Pol. Book fifth . Sect. 19. * Mr. Hs. peaceable design renewed . p. 14. (a;) A. S. Reconciler of Religions , Printed 1663. c. 11. p. 38 , 39. (a,) Histoire Critique . Ch. 25. p. 392 , 393. (a,) S. Hieron . in prf . ad Comment . in Epist. ad Galat. — Vt sentirem me non tam Discipulam habere quam judicem . v. Psal. 119.99 . * S. Hieron . in Ep. ad Paulin. ad sensum suum incongrua aptant Testimonia — Et ad voluntatem suam S. Scripturam repugnantem trabunt . (a) R. H. Guide , &c. Disc. 4. p. 375 , 376 , 377 , 378 , &c. * V. Confess . fid . Christ. ed. nom . Eccles. Polon . &c. (a) V. Innoc. 3. in decret . Greg. l. 1. tit . 33. c. 6. Greg. 7. Ep. l. 8. Ep. 21. Extrav . de Major & Obed. c 1. P. Pi. 5. in Bull● Cont. R. Eliz. in Camd. Annal . A. 1570. (b) Jerem. 1.10 . * D. Falkner in Christ. Loy . p. 315. (a) Domin . infrâ Octav. Nativ . in 2. nocturno Lect 8. p. 175. (b) Dom. infrâ Oct. Asc. in 3. Noct. p. 443. † Infra . Oct. Asc. 3. Noct. Lect. 8. p. 447. Assert . III. * S. Aug. Cont. Max. l. 3.