Some questions resolved concerning Episcopal and Presbyterian government in Scotland Cunningham, Alexander. 1690 Approx. 65 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 19 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2003-11 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A35430 Wing C7592 ESTC R11553 12032372 ocm 12032372 52778 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A35430) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 52778) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 865:16) Some questions resolved concerning Episcopal and Presbyterian government in Scotland Cunningham, Alexander. Cunningham, Gabriel. [4], 31, [1] p. Printed for the author : and are to be sold by Randal Taylor ..., London : 1690. Reproduction of original in Britol Public Library, Britol, England. By Alexander Cunningham; ascribed in error to Gabriel Cunningham. cf. Halkett & Laing. Table of contents: p. [1] at end. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Church of Scotland -- Government. Episcopal Church in Scotland. Presbyterianism -- Early works to 1800. 2003-07 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2003-07 Apex CoVantage Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2003-09 John Latta Sampled and proofread 2003-09 John Latta Text and markup reviewed and edited 2003-10 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion SOME Questions Resolved CONCERNING EPISCOPAL AND PRESBYTERIAN GOVERNMENT IN SCOTLAND . I protest before the great God , and since I am here as upon my Testament , it is no time for me to lye in , that ye shall never find with any High-Land or border Thieves , greater Ingratitude , and more Lies , and vile Perjuries , then with these Phanatick Spirits . And suffer not the Principles of them to brook your Land , if you like to sit at rest : Except you keep them for trying your Patience , as Socrates did an evil Wife . K. J. his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , lib. 2. p. 51. Lond. LONDON , Printed for the Author , and are to be Sold by Randal Taylor , near Stationers-Hall , 1690. IMPRIMATUR , Z. Isham , R. P. D. Henrico , Episc. Lond. à Sacris . March 10 1690. THE PREFACE . THE Government by Arch-Bishops and Bishops , was in Scotland restored An. 1662 , as being most agreeable to the Word of God , most convenient for the preservation of Truth , Order , and Unity , and most suitable to Monarchy , and the peace and quiet of the State. Those motives for its Restitution are every way so great , that none others can be so worthy of the Wisdom of that Nation , which challengeth a more early Profession of Christianity , and an Ancienter Race of Kings , than any of these parts of Christendom can well pretend to . But that Ecclesiastical Government , which in its self is most agreeable to the Scriptures , and best fitted against Heresie and Schism , may to prejudiced Men seem burthensome , and by them be Misrepresented to others . From this it hath happened , that the Episcopacy ( as Exercised in Scotland these 26 years ) hath been of late abolished , as an unsupportable Grievance to the Nation , contrary to the general Inclition of the People , and inconsistent with the Legal Establishment of that Church at the Reformation : Whoever duly compares the Narratives of these Two Acts , the one , about its Restitution , and the other , about its Abolishment , may find some of their Reasons why no other Ecclesiastick Politie is yet settled in its place ; For by this delay , every Member of Parliament hath had time to consider what Church Government for Essentials is of Divine Right , and may both preserve the Church from Heresie and Schism , and the State from Usurpation and Rebellion ; and which may best conduce to the satisfaction of all Religious Protestants , and Loyal Subjects in that Kingdom . For this Effect , the due consideration of the following Questions is doubtless of great importance , and the impartial Resolution of them cannot but be at this time very seasonable . Whether they are resolved here with such impartiality as this matter requires , is submitted to the unbyassed Iudgment of the Reader : Whom I shall desire that if he has any thing to object , he will tell the world in Charity and Meekness , that are the proper Characters of Christianity , and not in that Unchristian way of Evil Speaking and Reviling , which sufficiently shews what Spirt he is of , that writ , The brief and true Account of the Sufferings of the Church of Scotland , occasioned by the Episcopalians since the year 1660. I wish I had seen that Pamphlet before this was going to the Press . It would have Occasion'd me to add some things more , tho' I do not find my self obliged by it , to alter any thing that I have Written . SOME Questions , &c. QUESTION I. Whether Presbytery ( as contrary to the Episcopacy restored in Scotland , An. 1662. ) was settled by Law when the Protestant Religion came to have the Legal Establishment in that Kingdom ? 1. ALL the Dispute here , intrinsick to the notion of a Church Governour , is purely this ; Whether he should be nominated by the State or by the Church ; whether after Nomination , the power to Elect him should be entrusted to a Delegated Number , or remain in the mixt Synod of Clergy and Laity ; and whether after the Election is past , his Institution unto his Office should be for Life , or only during Pleasure ; and lastly , whether in the Exercise of his Function he have a Negative voice over his Synod , or they a Conclusive Voice over him : Wherefore the Presbyterian Moderator An. 1662. abolished , is rightly defined , the Church-Moderator , Nominated and Elected by the Clergy , Lay-Elders and Deacons of the Synod ; instituted unto his Office during their pleasure ; invested with no fixed Power of Ordination ; nor any Negative Voice in the exercise of his Jurisdiction . And the Episcopacy which was then restored , is by the Rule of contraries a Church-Government of a Moderator Nominated by the King ; Elected by the Chapter ; invested with a fixed power of Ordination regulated by Cannons ; and of Jurisdiction balanced by assisting Presbyters . 2. Now although such an Episcopacy was in Scotland taken away April last , yet since Presbytery is not yet setl'd by Law , this question of Fact propos'd about it , may be stated and resolved according to Truth , without the crime of LEESING MAKING . 3. It is not to be doubted , but that the Protestant Religion had the Legal Establishment in Scotland , in the year 1567 , in which year by Parliamentary Statutes Popery was Abolished , a Protestant Confession of Faith Authorized , and their Kings by the Coronation Oath obliged to maintain it . 4. By the Nature of the Scottish Monarchy , neither the King without Advice of his Estates , nor they without his Royal Consent touching the Publick Act with his Scepter , can make or unmake Laws to govern the People : Wherefore the Constitution of Bishops having then the Publick Authority , ( the Popish Bishops sitting in this Parliament which thus setl'd the Reformation ) must in the construction of the Law be confest to remain firm and valid from the aforesaid year 1567 , till the full Legislative Power of the King in Parliament , concur'd to shake or destroy it . 5. But whatever was done at that time in favour of Mr. Iohn Knox his Book of POLICY , ( proposing a superintendency which is another Model of Episcopacy ) or Mr. An. Melvil his Book of DISCIPLINE , ( proposing Presbytery , An. 1578 ) by Acts of Privy Council extorted in tumultuous times , through the Menacing Applications of Clergy Men Assembling themselves without Warrant ; yet before the year 1592 , there is no Act of Parliament either in Print or Unprinted , setling that Presbytery which is contrary to the Episcopacy Established before , and remaining in substance at the time of the Reformation . 6. Wherefore the impartial Resolution of the Question proposed , is in short this , That Presbytery , as contrary to the Episcopacy restored in Scotland An. 1662 , was not by Law setled 35 years after the Protestant Religion had the Legal Establishment in that Kingdom . QUESTION II. Whether ever Presbytery was setled in the Church of Scotland , without constraint from tumultuous times ? 1. KING Iames describing the Presbyterians , calls them the very Pests in the Church and Commonwealth , whom no deserts can oblige , neither Oaths nor Promises bind , brea thing nothing but Sedition and Calumnies , Aspiring without Measure , Railing without Reason , and making their own Imaginations ( without any warrant of the Word ) the square of their Conscience . And thereafter describing their Church Politie and Discipline , calls it that Parity which can never stand with the Order of the Church , nor the Peace of a Commonweal , and well Ruled Monarchy : Now when these are the Characters which the British Solomon gives Presbyterians and Presbytery ( and with a Protestation before God that he lies not ) Who can with any shadow of Reason , or grain of Charity , think that he either was so Unwise or Irreligious , as by Act of Parliament to Establish Presbytery in the Church , out of his own free choice , and not out of some kind of Compulsion : Nay , when that Government and its Admirers have these Characters from him , can any thinking man read over the Act of Restitution of Bishops An. 1606 , and not believe that , according to its Preamble , the former Act An. 1592 , impairing that first Estate of his Kingdom , was purely owing to his young years and the unsetled Condition of Affairs ? How he was forced to it we may learn from his own Book , wherein he says , that God Almighty was pleased that the Blessed Reformation of Scotland should begin with Unordinate and Popular Tumults , of men clogg'd with their own Passion and particular Respects ; that some fiery spirited Ministers got such a guiding of the People at that time of Confusion , as finding the gust of Government sweet , they began to fancy a Democracy to themselves ; that having been over well baited upon the wrack , first of his Royal Grandmother , and next of his own Mother , and usurping the liberty of time in his own long Minority , there never rose any Faction among Statesmen , but they that were of that Factious part , were careful to perswade and allure the Church-Men to espouse that quarrel as their own : Wherefore in the year 1592 , the pernicious Feuds between the Earls of Huntley and Murray , and those Contests between the Assembly Men of the Clergy and the Lords of the Session : Together with repeated Treasonable Plots carried on against his Royal Person , by Bothwel , and his Associates , of the greatest Power and best Quality , forced that young King to settle Presbytery in the Church , that thereby he might bring off Presbyterians from joyning with the Acts of their Kirk to unsettle his Throne . 3. Charles the First of ever Blessed Memory , he pleads that in Charity he may be thought desirous to preserve the English Church Government by Bishops in its right Constitution , as a Matter of Religion , wherein both his Iudgment was justly satisfied , that it hath of all others the fullest Scripture Grounds , and also the constant practice of all Christian Churches . And after he had written this Confession with Ink , and then Sealed it with his Royal Blood , who can imagine that his once giving some way to Presbytery in Scotland , was his voluntary Act , especially when his Majesties Commissioner the Earl of Traquair , ( according to instructions ) gave in his Declaration to the contrary : But here there is no need to declare the unhappy State of Affairs that forced him to it : Since there are Volumes written concerning that Religious Rebellion , which produced the most horrid Murder of the best King that ever was in these Kingdoms . 4. Wherefore the Impartial Resolution to the question proposed , is in short this , that K. Iames the 6th , and K. Charles I. setled Presbytery in the Kingdom of Scotland , being constrained thereunto by troublesome and tumultuous times . QUESTION III. Whether the Principles of Scottish Presbytery grant any Toleration to Dissenters ? 1. SINCE the solemn League and Covenant is the Canon , and the Acts of the general Assembly the Comment , of the Principles of Scotch Presbytery , this Question in reference to their Toleration of Dissenters , plainly resolves in this , Whether Covenanters and Assembly-men according to their Principles , are for Liberty of Conscience , or against it ? 2. In the first Article of the Solemn League , they swear , That they shall sincerely , really and constantly endeavour the preservation of the Reformed Religion in the Church of Scotland in Discipline and Government against their common Enemies . 3. To preserve this part of the Reformation , they swear again in the second Article against Popish Prelacy , that is , the Church Government by Arch-Bishops , Bishops , their Chancelors and Commissiaries , Dean and Chapters , Arch-Deacons , and all other Ecclesiastical Officers depending on that Hierarchy , Superstition and Heresie . 4. What is meant by their Sincere Real and constant endeavour against their common Enemies ( King or Parliament ) for preserving that Reformation in Church-Government , by extirpating such an Episcopacy , is manifest in the last Article , in which they swear to assist and def●nd all those that enter into the League and Covenant , in the maintaining and persuing thereof , and that they shall not suffer themselves directly or indirectly , by whatsoever Combination , Perswasion or Terror to be divided from their Blessed Union and Conjunction , whether to make defection to the contrary part , or to give themselves to a detestable indifferency or neutrality in the Cause , which so much concerneth the Glory of God. 5. But if after all these parts of the first , second , fourth , and sixth Articles of the Covenant compared together , any Seruple yet remains , whether those Men who make Conscience of the Oath they have taken against any Indifferency or Neutrality in this Cause against Episcopacy , ( which in Charity I believe they think the Cause of Christ ) can allow any Toleration to Dissenters , let us in the next place consider some Acts of their General Assemblies , which are the Infallible Interpreters of this Rule of their Faith about Ecclesiastical Polity . Now although the Episcopal Clergy in the times before the year 1639 , ( when they saw that destruction of the Church Government ) neither themselves appear'd in Tumults nor in Sermons , or Books , exhorted others to Tumultuate , ( for to preserve it ) yet the Presbyterians were so far from taking pains to gain them unto a Conformity , or in case they conform'd , from letting them continue in their Cures ( as the Presbyterians were dealt with , after the year 1662 ) that on the contrary they pass these following Acts. 6. The General Assembly ordaineth , the subscription of the Covevant to all the Members of that Kirk and Kingdom . 7. And whereas the former Act Aug. 1630. hadnot been obeyed , it was again ordain'd by another Assembly , That all Ministers make intimation of the said Act in their Kirks , and thereafter proceed with the Censures of the Kirk against such as shall refuse to subscribe the Covenant ; and that exact account be taken of every Ministers diligence herein by their Presbyteries and Synods , as they will answer to the General Assembly . 8. Neither was this last Act , inflicting Ecclesiastical Censures only to fall heavy upon those who were hinderers of their blessed Reformation , ( whom they called Anticovenanters ) but in the Assembly , it 's appointed , that all Ministers take special notice when any secret disaffecters of the Covenant shall come within their Parishes , that so soon as they shall know the same , they may without delay , cause warn them to appear before the Presbyteries , within which their Parishes lies , or before the Commissioners of the Assembly appointed for Publick Affairs , as they shall find most convenient ; which warning the Assembly , declares shall be a sufficient Citation unto them . 9. And that all , and every one of such Offenders shall humbly acknowledge their Offence upon their knees , first , before the Presbytery , and thereafter , before the Congregation , upon a Sabbath , in some place before the Pulpit ; and in the mean time , they be suspended from the Lords Supper . And in case they do not satisfie in manner aforesaid , they be processed with Excommunication : And this is as easie an Ecclesiastick Censure as the whole body of their Acts of Assembly have upon Record , or any now alive can remember . Nay , the Assembly enjoyns this Excommunication against Covenanters themselves , who but in so far comply with Malignancy ( the King 's Evil of those times ) as to drink the health of any declar'd a Common Enemy of that Covenanted Kirk and Kingdom . 10. And in case any Excommunicated Malignant should , for all his being Heathen , be yet so much the Christian , as to long after the Communion of Christ's Body and Blood , they did all they could to hinder it : For not only is it by them ordain'd , That all Deposed Ministers , who after the Sentence of Deprivation pronounced against them , exercise any part of the Ministerial Calling in the Places they formerly served in , or else where , they should be proceeded against with Excommunication : but Five Years before , Anno 1643. it was by them provided , that if any Covenanted Minister should haunt the company of any Excommunicated Person , he should for the first fault , be suspended from his Ministry , by his Presbytery , during their pleasure : and for the second fault be deprived : and in case the Presbyteries be negligent therein , that the Provincial Assembly shall censure the Presbytery thus negligent : And when they have done sufficiently to deprive the Excommunicate person of all Spiritual Mercy ( as far as they could do ) they proceed to take from him all his temporal comfort of Liberty and Property according to their Act , whereby they order his Person to be imprisoned , after the loss of his Goods and Estate . 11. Now these being the Principles of Presbytery , founded upon the Oath of the Covenant ( to extirpate Episcopacy , and never to be indifferent in the Cause ) and explained in the Assembly-Acts , ( enjoyning Censure and Excommunication , and recommending to the State the Temporal punishment of Forfeiture and Imprisonment to pass thereupon against all Persons disaffected ) the impartial resolution to the Question is this , That the Principles of Scottish Presbytery grant no Toleration to Dissenters . QUESTION IV , Whether between the Year 1662. and the Year 1689. Presbyterian Separatists were guilty of sinful Separation ? 1. THE Larger Catechism agreed upon by the pretended Assembly at Westminster , with assistance of Commissioners from the Kirk of Scotland , and thereafter approved by their general Assembly , teacheth such Doctrine , as from it can be demonstrated how necessary it is for Salvation that every person keep Communion with the particular Church established by the Laws of the State he liveth in ; unless she either enjoyn in her Canons any sinful term of Communion , or propose in her Confession of Faith any Heretical Article , or prescribe in her Directory for Worship , any Idolatrous impurity . So that the Question here proposed plainly resolves into this , Whether the Episcopal Church of Scotland these 27 years enjoyn'd any sinful Canon as a term of Communion , or prosess'd any erroneous Doctrine to be believed , or directed any Idolatry to be performed in Divine Worship . 2. All the Presbyterians in the World cannot produce one Canon of any Synod of the Episcopal Church of Scotland , from 1662 ▪ to the last year , with which they will not readily comply , excepting those Canons that qualifie Ministers to the Exercise of the holy Function : and none of those are enjoyned the Clergy of that Perswasion , as a term of their Communion , but as a condition of their Ministration : So that however these should debar any Ministers from the Pulpit , they cannot shut them out of the Church ▪ Nay , when it hath been demonstrated to them ( in a Letter for Union , dated at Edinburgh the 4th of March last ) that never any Confession of our Reformed Church avowed a Divine Right in a parity among all Church-Officers ; and that the Solemn League did not abjure the President Bishop , and that the English Presbyterians , in Conscience of their Oath of the Covenant , petitioned for such an Episcopacy ; I think it may be presumed ( when twelve-months are past without any Reason published against the said Letter ) that they now believe that sin lieth at their door , for leaving their Charges after the Restauration of our Kingly Government , upon the point of Difference about Episcopacy . 3. In the second place , the Scottish Presbyterians , for Matters of Faith , adhere to the Westminster Consession , in obedience to the Act of their General Assembly : Now let any Presbyterian discover , if he can , one single Article of all the three and thirty Chapters of that Confession , that was ever condemn'd by the late Episcopal Church of Scotland , in any whatsoever Synod , since the time of its Restitution . 4. Thirdly , Scotch Presbyterians , for publick Worship in the Church , retain the Directory , composed by the foresaid pretended Assembly at Westminster , and thereafter approved by the General Assemblies of their Kirk . Now to this Rule of Divine Service the established Episcopal Church there hath these 27 years been more conformable than the Presbyterians ever were or are . It is true , that those who have Sworn in the Solemn Leagne to preserve the Protestant Religion as it stood reformed in Scotland , An. 1638. and to reform the Kingdom of England , in the same point of Worship , according to the Example of the Church of Scotland , are by virtue of this their Solemn Oath obliged to ling the Doxologie after the singing Psalms , ever after the year Forty Eight , as well as they did it all the ten years before ; and to avoid the sin of Perjury , they were bound to make their English Brethren to sing it , rather than at their instigation to forbear to sing it themselves . But not to insist upon this Covenant-Obligation , doubtless when the Episcopal Church of Scotland continues that Christian Hymn , which the Directory hath no where forbidden , their sin of Commission is not half so great as the Omission of the Lords Prayer , which the Directory enjoyneth to be said at Sermon times , of which Omission the Presbyterians are only guilty , of all the Christians in the world . 5. Again , in Administration of both Sacraments , the Episcopal Church of Scotland , observeth the Directory in all things , save one which is a very justifiable Practice ; and that is in the Office of Baptism , the solemn Confession of the Apostolick Creed , which both the pretended Assembly here at Westminster , and the General Assembly there in Scotland , ( at the end of the shorter Catechism ) acknowledge to be a Brief Sum of the Christian Faith , agreeable to the Word of God , and amiently received in the Churches of Christ : This their acknowledgment of its Antiquity and Scripture Purity , must force any Scotch Presbyterian , to grant that there is no more sin in saying the Apostles Creed publickly in the Church , tho' there be no precept for saying it , than there is in sprinkling water upon the Baptized Infant . 6. Now laying all these considerations together , that the purity in Doctrine which Presbyterian Synods confess , and the purity of Publick Worship , doing nothing which the Directory forbids , could be as well retained in the Episcopal Church of Scotland these 27 years , as in any Presbyterian Kirk or Meeting-House : And that no Confession of any Reformed Church , asserts the Divine Right of their Presbytery as before defined : And that the Covevenant abjures not the Epis opacy likewise defin'd , but on the contrary it was peti●ioned for by the English Covenanters , I say laying all these things together , the impartial Resolution of the present Question , is this , That between the year 1662 , and the year 1689 , Presbyterian Separatists were guilty of sinful Separation . QUESTION V. Whether the Penal Laws against Scotch Presbyterians , had any thing of Persecution in them ? 1. IT cannot be denied but there may be a party in a Kingdom of well meaning men , truly Pious and Peaceable , who yet for some Non-Conformity to the Church-Establishment , may have too severe Laws Enacted against them , by the Execution of which they may suffer for Conscience Sake ; so that the question here proposed , plainly resolves into this , Whether the Penal Laws against Scotch Presbyterians had any thing in them which cannot be justified in Christian Policy as necessary , ( at those times in which they were Enacted ) for the Preservation of true Religion and Publick Peace in the Church and State ? Or whether they were the uncharitable effects of a peevish resentment , inconsistent with good Nature or Christianity ? 2. Forasmuch as it had pleased Almighty God to compassionate the Troubles and Confusions of Scotland , by returning King Charles the 2d , to the exercise of that Royal Government , under which , and its excellent Constitution , that Kingdom had for many Ages enjoyed so much Happiness , Peace , and Plenty ; The Noble Lord the Earl of Middleton , being for his unshaken Loyalty honoured with his Majesties High Commission , the Administration of the Oath of Allegiance , to all the Members of Parliament , was the first thing enacted by the States thereof . 3. In Conscience of their Oaths of Allegiance , to maintain and defend the Sovereign Power and Authority of the Kings Majesty ; and in consideration of the sad consequences that do accompany any encroachments upon , or diminution thereof , they , from their sen●e of humble Duty , wholy applyed themselves in this Session , to Establish such wholesome Laws , as might by acknowledgment of his Majesties Prerogatives , prove Salves to cure the State from the Diseases of Anarchy and Confusion , which had before in the Usurpation seized her Vitals . 4. But all this time of the Parliaments sole application to matters of State , in this first Session , the Presbyterian Clergy did not neglect to do all they could for a Parliamentary Confirmation of their Ecclesiastical Government . 5. First , the Synod of Edenburgh , applyed themselves to a Person of great Interest with his Majesties Commissioner , that his Grace might be intreated to procure from his Royal Master , instructions to give them Presbytery without Bishops ; and they promised that they should themselves Enact , never to meet without his Majesties Commissioner , who should call and dissolve them at his pleasure : Which Act of theirs , they promised to get ratified by the first General Assembly . 6. And when they found this Address of theirs to be without any success , they sall upon another method , and send a Clergyman , whose name ( because of his Memory for his Piety and School Learning ) I shall not mention , with this threatning , that if the Estates in Parliament consirm'd not their Presbytery , they should have the People let loose upon them ▪ 7. In that first Session of the Parliament already mentioned , the King with the Advice of the Estates therein Convened , had before forbid the renewing of the Solemn League and Covenant , and by several Acts annulled all the pretended Conventions of the preceeding Rebellion ; but this imperious Address from the Ministers , gave them a new sensible occasion to be perswaded , that all the late Disorders and Exorbitances in the Church , incroachments upon the Prerogative and Right of the Crown , and Usurpations upon the Authority of Parliaments , and the prejudice done to the Liberty of the Subject , were the Natural Effects of the Invasion made upon the Episcopal Government ; and therefore upon deliberation of twenty Months , they past an Act of its Restitution , in the beginning of the second Session of that Parliament . 8. This Act of Restitution of Bishops had this effect , in reference to the Scottish Clergy : Whoever among them were disappointed in their hopes of Preferment , or were Lovers of Ease from the burthensome Service in the Church , or else impatient to be made subordinate to those with whom they so lately had been upon a Level , forsook their Ministry , but they lived quietly at their respective habitations , and in Personal Conformity to the Church Establisht . Others again ( and of them not a few ) were sensible that the Established Episcopacy , being obliged to exercise their Jurisdiction in a Synod with the ballance of Assisting Presbyters , was the only Church Government which could be obtained of the State , ( and which was not abjur'd in the Solemn League ) and therefore did keep their Charges , and were willing to own Canonical Obedience to their Diocesan Bishops . 9. This Example of Christian submission to Authority , given by the generality of Presbyterian Ministers of both sorts , gain'd the Laity of that Perswasion to a Pious and Sober observance of the Publick Worship ; so that at that time nothing was wanting to render that National Church happy without Protestant Dissenters , but a competent number of Godly , Learned , and Grave Men to fill up the vacant places of those who , for any of the Motives before mentioned , had left their charges ; and till that deplorable want ( especially in the West , ) the Separation from the regular Meetings for Divine Service , was so little observable , that before June 1663 , the wisdom of that Nation had by no Act provided against it . 10. It is true , that the libellous Sermons and Books of some wicked Men , which were written to justify the Murder of Charles the I. and the Banishment of Charles the II. the renovation of the Covenant , the necessity of taking up Arms to promote its Ends , and the sinfulness of complyance with the legal Settlement in Church or State , did now alarm that Parliament . 11. They considered how seditious , and of how dangerous example and consequence Seperation from the rugular Church might prove for the future : And therefore for security of the State from the confusions they had so lately smarted under , they were forced to enact a Penal Law against it , importing , That every Person having an Inheritance , should pay the fourth part of his yearly Estate ; every Yeoman Tenant or Farmer the fourth part of his free moveables ( after the payment of their Dues to their Master ; ) and that every Burgess should lose all the Priviledges within the Borough , and the fourth part of his moveables . 12. But notwithstanding this Penal Law , the contagion of those Books and Sermons which poisoned so many with Principles of Separation from the established Church , produced the renovation of the Covenant , contrary to the Authority of the King and Parliament ; and that again was followed by an open Rebellion of the Western parts ( known by the name of Pentlin Hills ) in the Year 1666 , defeated by the King's Army , so that they were out of capacity of resisting : However , the King in his Royal Clemency , at the Address of some States-men , gave them indulgence to convene in Meeting-Houses for Divine Worship ; and they made this good use of his Mercy , as that by them the incumbent Ministers ( whose Characters would have secured them any where but in the West of Scotland ) had their Houses in the night time invaded , their Persons assaulted , wounded and pursued for their Lives . Then indeed , that merciful Prince , with advice of his Estates in Parliament , having a just indignation of such horrid and unchristian Villanies , thought fit to brand the same with a signal mark of displeasure . And this Act of the Date , Aug. 1670. is the first that punisheth with Death and confiscation of Goods . 13. It is true indeed , the King and his Estates of Parliament , filled with indignation at the scandalous sin , which procured this former Penal Law ; and understanding from thence , that the specious pretences of Religion were altogether false , and taken up by seditious Persons ; They immediately pass'd another Act against Conventicles ; the Preamble of which last Act declares , That such Meetings were the ordinary Seminaries of Rebellion as well as Separation , that they tended to the alienating the Hearts of the Subjects from their Duty and Obedience they owe to his Majesty and the Publick Laws , and by consequence , to the reproach of the Authority of the King and Parliament , as well as the prejudice of Gods publick Worship , and the scandal of the Reformed Rel●gion : And therefore they were obliged in reason of State , as well as for the Peace of the Church , to make the Penalty of this Law fall heavy upon the Transgressors thereof . 14 And the Penalties therein contained ( as nigh as I can value Scottish Mony by the current Coin in England ) are these following : That every Minister , preaching at a Conventicle , should be imprisoned till he find surety for 275 l. that he should not do the like thereafter , or else oblige himself by Bond to remove out of the Kingdom , and never to return without his Majesties leave ; that every one of any Inheritance should pay the fourth part of his yearly Estate ; that every Servant should pay the fourth part of his yearly Wages ; that every Farmer should pay Forty Shillings , and every Tenant under them Twenty . 12. Further , His Majesty understanding that divers disaffected Persons had been so maliciously wicked and disloyal , as to convocate his Subjects to open Meetings in the Fields ; and considering that those Meetings were the rendezvous of Rebellion , and tending in a high measure to the disturbance of the publick Peace , declares , that those who in Arms did convocate in Field Conventicles , should be punishable by Death , and confiscation of Goods ; and that those present at them , should be punished in double the respective Fines appointed against House-Meetings . This Act is dated Aug. the 30th . 1670. 13. These acts against Separation in Meeting-houses , or in the Fields , were appointed to endure only for the space of three years , unless his Majesty should think fit to continue them longer ; wherefore his Majesty considering that they had not received due Obedience , and that the execution thereof had not been so prosecuted , as by the Tenor of the same is prescribed , found it necessary , with the advise of his Estates in Parliament , in Sept. 1672. that they should remain in force for other three Years to come . 14. These are the Penal Laws in Scotland against the Presbyterians , made by divers free Parliaments against their sinful Separation from the Church , to frequent Meeting-houses or Field-Conventicles , upon mature consideration of the inconsistency of it , with Religion towards God ; Affection to the Laws ; Loyalty to the King ; or Study of the publick Peace of the State : And three Rebellions in 23 years ( from the year 1663 to the year 1686 ) have justifyed the Justice and Wisdom of these Parliaments . But none ever suffered for meer Separation but in purse ; and never any was punished that way , but such as came to Church to save their Money , notwithstanding all their pretended scruples of Conscience : Wherefore unless we derogate from the Authority of King and Parliament , justify Rebellion , and prefer private Humour to publick Peace , the impartial Resolution of the present Question is this , That the Penal Laws against the Scotch Presbyterians had nothing of Persecution in them . QUESTION VI. Whether the Episcopal Clergy in Scotland from the Year 1662 to the Year 1686 , shewed any thing of the Spirit of Persecution against Presbyterians ? 1. NOtwithstanding that the Presbyterians are pleas'd to say , they were dragoon'd by the Bishops and Episcopal Clergy , alluding to that way of Conversion in France , which indeed was procur'd by an Address of the Assembly of the Clergy of that Kingdom ; yet this is a palpable Injustice and Calumny . For certain it is , that all these twenty four years never produced one Address of the Presbyterial , Diocesan , Provincial , or National Assembly of the Established Church of Scotland , either beseeching the High Court of Parliament , or the Lords of the Privy Council , to make or execute Laws against Protestant Dissenters : Wherefore , notwithstanding all the passionate Exhortations in private , and the publick Sermons in the Church , concerning the guiltiness of Schism , and the necessity of Union among Protestants , against their common Adversaries , the Inferiour Clergy there cannot be possibly charged with the Spirit of Persecution against Presbyterians . Nay , upon the contrary , our Clergy were so averse from giving obedience to the Act that enjoyned them to present written Lists of the Dissenters in their respective Parishes , and so very inflexible to the Publick Order for their Judicial informing upon Oath against Separatists , that the Judges competent , and Officers of State chid them in Publick for disaffection to the Royal Government ; so that under that Imputation they had nothing but their Innocency to support them , in the Spirit of Meekness and Charity to their sworn Enemies . 2. Again , it were a great Injustice to the Lords Spiritual , the Bishops , to charge any of them as having been the first movers of those Penal Laws against Separation ; but since the repeated Rebellions of Forty Years past , convinced all Mankind of the necessity of those Laws for the security of Religion and the Peace of the State , the Bishops consenting , or even advising to those Laws , is so far from inferring their having a Persecuting Spirit , that on the contrary , their doing otherwise , had demonstrated them to be Enemies to the Commonwealth , in all its concerns both Sacred and Civil . 3. But withal , it cannot but be acknowledged by any one that considers things calmly , that none of those Bishops had it ever in their power to shew acts of Compassion towards deluded Separatists of whatever quality , but he chearfully did it , in relieving their Necessities , or mitigating the execution of the Penalties by Law enjoin'd . To make a proof of this by enumerating particular Acts of Charity ( which Presbyterians , to this day alive , will acknowledge ) would make the Resolution of this Question swell Four times bigger than all the Four Letters concerning the present Persecution of their Clergy ; therefore I shall forbear it . 4. Now since Private Exhortations , and Publick Sermons against Schism , and recommending Union , were all the appearances made by that Inferiour Clergy against Separatists ; and since all the Bishops in Parliament advis'd to no Penal Laws against Separation , but such as were justified to the World by a Threefold Rebellion , to be necessary in Policy as well as Religion , for the common good of the State as well as Church ; I say , after all , the impartial Resolution of the present Question is this , That the Episcopal Clergy in Scotland , from the year 1662 to the year 1686 , shewed nothing of the Spirit of Persecution against Presbyterians . QUESTION VII . Whether the Episcopal Church of Scotland were Compliers with the Designs for taking away the Penal Laws against the Papists ? 1. FOr the clearer resolution of this Question , let us distinguish betwixt the Scottish Episcopal Church , diffused through all the Laity of that Kingdom ; and that Church again under the more restrained notion of Representative , comprehending the Clergy : and let us likewise distinguish the Clergy unto the Lords Spiritual the Bishops , and the subordinate Ministers and Pastors ; that so without partiality , every one of these Societies of Protestants may be considered in reference to the matter of fact in question . 2. And to begin with their Episcopal Church Diffusive . The Two Estates of Barons ( great and less ) and Burgesses , fully represent them , in Parliamentary Assemblies ; the free and full Parliament convened An. 1685. consisted of such Men as had all of them sworn in the Test against the Covenant-Principles of Presbytery : This Episcopal Parliament so resolutely own'd themselves to be averse from taking away these Legal Restraints upon Papists , that the Vote about repealing those Penal Laws came never further than the Lords of the Articles : All this the Episcopal Church Diffusive did , with the apparent hazard of displeasing the Prince , who was then so zealous for an extensive Liberty to Papists , that for the disappointment which he found therein from that Parliament , he chose to turn out of his Service , some who had been the most faithful to him both in Civil and Military Affairs . 3. Again , for the Church Representative of Scotland , the most malicious Enemies to the Episcopal Order , asperse but two of fourteen Bishops , for their complyance to these designs ; and it is as well known that two of the twelve were depriv'd . 4. Then as for the inferior Clergy , they were constantly faithful in Preaching against the Doctrines of the Roman Church , notwithstanding the necessity they were under , of reading the Law against LEESING MAKING , every quarter of the year , to affright them into silence ; they as often as they preached , remembred in their Publick Prayers , the persecuted Protestants in France , notwithstanding all that was done to stifle and disparage the belief of the Persecution ; nay , in none of their Synodical Sermons , was the eminent danger from the busie Jesuites and other Papists forgotten ; nor in any Sermon , the miserable Fopperies of Popery omitted , even before his Majesties own Commissioner , whether in the Cathedral Church at Edenborough , or the Chappel Royal at Holy-Rood-House : And in the Synod of April 1685 , ( when the Bishops could not be with them , by reason of the approaching Parliament ) they drew up their Remonstrances against Popery ; and like dutiful Sons and Zealous Protestants , shewed their ready concurrence with the Bishops , in that day of Tryal : And it 's certain , that to their Interest with the Country , it is chiefly to be attributed , that the Penal Laws against Papists were not then repealed . 5. All this they did , not with connivance of the Court , but with apparent hazard of its heaviest displeasure , executed in the censuring of some , suspension of others , and deposition of others , who were all patient and chearful Confessors for that Holy Religion , which they Professed and Taught in season and out of season : Wherefore the impartial Resolution to the present Question , is this , That neither the Episcopal Church Diffusive , nor Representative the Clergy , whether Superior , or Inferior , were Compliers with the Designs for taking away the Penal Laws against Papists . QUESTION VIII . Whether the Scottish Presbyterians were Complyers with the Designs for taking away the Penal Laws against Papists ? IN satisfying this Question , let us take the same method which we took to satisfie the former : And to begin with the Laity of the Presbyterian Perswasion , none of these were ignorant that the Convening of the Parliament in 1685 , was to obtain of them a free admission of Papists into all places of Trust ; King Iames his Principles for Liberty of Conscience , fill'd up all his Declarations for Indulgence within his Kingdoms ; none of the Presbyterians were unacquainted that he had sent an Ambassador to the Pope , and that the Pope had his Nuncio at Whitehall ; none of them believed that the English Court in those circumstances , would do any thing relating to Religion , but what was agreeable to the measures of the Conclave ; none of them were ignorant , that Papists call all Protestants Hereticks , and that they damn all Hereticks to Hell ; and that King Iames oft declared , that Presbyterians could not be Loyal ; and that he could never so much forget the Murder of his Royal Father of ever Blessed Memory , as to trust them himself : There was none of them but knew , that every Zealous Papist believes the Roman Church Infallible ; and that Infallibility is inconsistent with Liberty of Conscience : And therefore all the Presbyterian Laity were doubtless conscious , that the Indulgence given to them by a Popish King , assented unto by the Pope's Nuncio , conformable to the Sense of the Roman Conclave , could never be intended for the Ease of Protestant Dissenters , but with design of making Papists share in the Blessing ; and that by this step Papists , got into Power , might apply it to the overthrow of the Reformation , was doubtless obvious to every Presbyterian : And therefore the acceptance of , and thanksgiving for such an Indulgence , was a gross complyance with the designs for Popery , tending to the destruction of the Protestant Religion . 2. All this Charge lies equally heavy upon the Ministers of that Perswasion , with these aggravating circumstances , that whereas in the Reign of a Protestant King , they preached against Popery as imminent and at hand ; they in the Reign of a Popish King , were guilty ( for the most part ) of shameful silence ; yea when one of their number ( more faithful than the rest ) viz. Doctor Hardy , in a Sermon at Edenborough , which he preached at their Provincial Assembly , had Exhorted them to take heed , that the Indulgence to Proustant Dissenters , might not be an Engine for bringing Popery into the Kingdom ; and when for the preaching of this Sermon , he was Arraigned for his Life , none of all his Brethren , nor any of the Laity , ( except the good Mr. R. B — d Merchant in Edenborough ) would shew him any Friendship : But on the contrary , they did openly condemn his doing his Duty , as indiscreet Zeal : And certainly he had suffered as the worst of Malefactors ; had it not been for the Episcopal Advocates that pleaded for him , and the Episcopal Judges that acquitted him , and took all his danger upon themselves : Wherefore the impartial Resolution to the present Question , is this , That the Scotch Presbyterians were Compliers with the late Designs for taking away the legal Restraints against Papists . QUESTION IX . Whether Scottish Presbytery in the Church , be consistent with the Legal Monarchy in that Kingdom ? 1. AS the Solemn League is the Canon , and the Acts of their General Assemblies , the Interpreters of the Principles of Scottish Presbytery ; so on the other hand , the Acts of Parliament of that Kingdom , are the only Interpreters of the Rights of their Monarchy : Wherefore the Question here proposed , resolveth unto this , Whether the Scotch Presbyterians in their Assembly Acts , which are founded upon the Covenant , make any Enchroachment upon the Royal Prerogatives of that Crown , which are asserted by their Acts of Parliament unrepealed . 2. To chuse Persons qualified by Law to be Officers of State , Councellors , and Iudges , is one Prerogative acknowledged to be inherent in the Kings of Scotland : but the Principles of their Presbytery , make this to be the Prerogative of the Kirk ; as appears by the 4th Article of the Covenant , wherein they swear to endeavour with all faithfulness the discovery of all such as have been or shall be evil Instruments , by making any Parties contrary to that Covenant , that they may be brought to publick Tryal , and receive condign punishment . This is farther declared in their Answer to the pretended Committee of Estates ; by which Answer they propose as a safe Rule in this case , that the Duties of the Second Table , as well as of the First , namely the Duties between King and Subject , Masters and Servants , being contained in , and to be taught and cleared from the Word of God , are a subject of Ministerial Doctrine , and in difficult cases a subject of cognizance and judgment , to the Assemblies of the Kirk : Now what cases are difficult , in which King and Subjects are the Parties , the Kirk must judge , and be as Infallible in Scotland as in Rome . 3. Another Perogative of the King of Scotland , is declared , his power of Calling and Dissolving Parliaments ( by himself ) and making of Laws with their Advice and Councel . And this Prerogative , in all its Branches , is usurped upon by the Principles of Presbytery . As for his power of calling Parliaments by himself , either Presbyterian Kirk-men are not Subjects of the Scottish King , or else by their acknowledgement of this Royal Prerogative , his Letters Patents directed to them , may command their Assembling about Ecclesiastical Affairs , as well as the other Estates to convene for Matters Civil : But should they once grant that the power of their Assembling flows immediately from the King their Soveraign , and not immediately from Christ ; then should they by Laws of consequence be obliged to confess , that Christ gives them no Warrant to Assemble without Warrant from their King. But this the Presbyterian Kirk cannot grant to the State , because thereby their Covenant should become an unlawful bond of Treason , and the most of their Assembly Acts null and void ; since first that Oath was sworn , and thereafter the most of those Acts were pass'd without , yea , and contrary to the express Will and Pleasure of their King. 4. Then the Kings Power to Dissolve Parliaments by himself is another Branch of his Royal Prerogative : But this is likewise Usurped upon by the Principles of Presbytery ; for as much as the Second Article of the Covenant bindeth to preserve the Priviledges of Parliament , with the preservation of which Priviledges , the General Assembly declares the Kings negative Voice inconsistent . Now if the King have no Negative Voice in a Parliament that enjoys its Priviledges , then any thing concluded by the Majority of such a Parliament , may pass into a formal Act , though the King should deny his concurrence ; and by consequence , without the Royal Assent , they might make a Law for continuing their Session as long as they please ; by vertue of which Law , the Royal Authority could not Dissolve them , according to these Covenanting Principles . 5. In the Third place , the power of making Laws is Usurped from King and Parliament by the Principles of Presbyterians : For in the last Article of their Covenant they swear that they shall all the Days of their lives zealously and constantly continue therein against all opposition , letts , and impediments whatsoever ; and in conscience of this part of their Oath the Kirk Assembly Men pass'd an Act declarative against an Act of Parliament and Committee of Estates ( dated in June , the same year , ) and in general , against all others made in the common cause without consent of the Church . 6. A Third Prerogative Royal in the Crown of Scotland , is that of making Leagues and Conventions of the Subjects . Now that cannot consist with the Principles which flow from that Covenant which was entred into by the Assembly of the Subjects , without the King ; and more particularly is it Invaded by those Principles by which they emitted an Act declaring against the bond subscribed by the Scotch Lords at Oxford , and inflicting the highest Ecclesiastical Censures against any who subscribed , or framed , or were accessary to the Execution of the same . 7. The making Peace and War with Foreign Princes , is another Branch of this Prerogative of the Crown of Scotland , acknowledged to be in the King. But this also , according to the Principles of Presbytery , is Usurped upon by that Kirk ; for she , in the Explication of the Sixth Article of the Covenant ( already mention'd in the Fourth number concerning the Third Question ) declares her self in her solemn and seasonable warning to all her Children of the Covenant , after this manner , Whosoever he be that will not according to publick Order and Appointment adventure his Person , or send out those that are under his power , or pay the Contributions imposed for the maintenance of the Forces , must be taken for an Enemy , Malignant , and Covenant-breaker , and so involved both into the displeasure of God , and censures of the Kirk . 8. Now the King's Power to chuse Officers of State , Counsellours and Iudges qualified by Law , to Call and Dissolve Parliaments by himself , and make Laws with their Advice , to make Leagues and Conventions of the Subjects , and to make Peace and War , being all Prerogatives Royal of the Crown of Scotland , asserted by Acts of Parliament unrepealed ; and all these being so notoriously Usurped upon by the Presbyterian Kirk , the impartial Resolution of the Question is this , That this Scottish Presbytery in the Church , is Not Consistent with legal Monarchy in that Kingdom . QUESTION X. Whether Scottish Presbytery be agreeable to the general Inclination of that People ? 1. AFter it hath been Demonstrated that the Principles of Scotch Presbytery are inconsistent with that Monarchy , to say that Presbyterian Church-Government were agreeable to the mind of the Representatives of that People in the current Parliament , might be constructed the capital Crime of LEISING MAKING to his Majesty , against his Supreme Judicature : And therefore this Question hath Reference to the People whom they represent ; and resolveth into this , Whether the generality of the Scottish Nation would be glad to accept of Presbytery , instead of the Episcopacy lately abolished . 2. For the clearer resolution of the Question thus stated , that Kingdom may be distinguished into the Laity and Clergy ; and the Laity distinguished into the Nobility , Gentry , and Commons : And the Clergy again into the Bishops and subordinate Pastors , after whom we may consider the Universities and Colledges of Learning . 3. As for the Nobility . Since that Honourable Estate of the Kingdom have by birth their Peerage in Parliament , beside that it were Scandalum magnatum to say that they inclin'd to that Church Government , which is not consistent with their Monarchy ; it were also a Scandalum Christianorum , to say that those Men of Honour and Conscience , who ( a very few excepted ) swore in the Test against all Fanatical Principles , and renounced all Covenant-Obligations , do incline to Presbytery . And it 's well known that there never were in Scotland above a dozen of Peers so much Presbyterian as to refuse the Declaration against the Covenant-Principles , the taking of which qualified them to sit in Parliament ▪ 4. Again , for the Scottish Gentry , it 's certain , that not One of Forty in all Scotland but has taken the Test ; and Four years ago , not Fifty in all Scotland ( out of the West ) did upon the Indulgence , forsake their Churches to frequent Meeting-Houses . And it cannot be supposed of any who have so generous Blood in their Veins , that they should have so little Honour or Conscience as to Incline to that Church Government , which usurps the Priviledge of entring into Covenants and Leagues , and Convening in Assemblies , for Treating , Consulting and Determining in matters Ecclesiastical , without the Royal Command , or express License : Which is a Practice contradicting the Promissory part of that Oath of the Test. 5. Then for the Commons ; it is certain that the generality of them ( as well as the richest and most sensible part ) live in Cities and Market Towns ; now all such Burgesses who were either worthy to be of the Common Council of the Towns they lived in , or were able to follow any ingenuous Trade , were obliged to take the Test before they could be qualified to elect Burgesses for Parliament ; and therefore , according to their Sense and Conscience of an Oath , they cannot but have an aversion against Presbytery ; yea , their loud Cries and Rivers of Tears at the Farewel-Sermons of their Episcopal-Pastors ( for whom they would have pluckt out their right Eyes ) in all other parts of Scotland but the Western Shires , heighteneth the probability , that they are not in love with Presbytery . 6. Then for the Clergy ; since they all have owned Episcopal Ordination , sworn the Oaths of Allegiance , Supremacy , and the Test , it cannot be suspected of any of them , without a blemish of their Integrity or Constancy , that they should be inclin'd to Presbyterian Government . And if Twenty of a Thousand are Trimmers betwixt the Bishop and the Presbyterian Moderator , yet sure those Twenty added to all the Field-Preachers and Meeting-housekeepers ▪ will not make up the number of a fifth part of the Episcopal Clergy : No doubt they will say , that what they want in the number , they have in the worth of their Ministers : But how far we may believe them in their setting value upon themselves , may partly appear from the consideration of their late Commissioners to this Court ; for doubtless , for the managing of their Cause , they made choice of the fittest Men they had , as for all other Abilities , so especially for soundness in the Principles of Presbytery , also of the greatest moderation ; and yet one of the Three , Mr. W — son , before he got his First Wife , was a malignant Lecturer under Bishops , and so continued , till his first disappointment of getting his Rectors Place , made him desert his own with Indignation , and that made him an enemy to Episcopacy . Another of them , Mr. K — dy , was , before the restitution of Bishops , deprived by his Presbyterian Brethren , ( to use their own Words as near as I can remember ) as a Firebrand of Hell to inflame the Church on Earth . The Third is so famous , that I never heard of him till he came in this Character . 7. Then in all the Four Universities , it is certain that not Four Masters , Head or Fellow , incline to Presbytery ; and the Colledges of Justice and Physick at Edenborough , were so averse from it , that the generality of them were ready last Summer , to take Arms in defence of their Episcopal Ministers . Wherefore , since neither the most part of the Scotch Noblemen , Gentry or Commons , Clergy , Universities or Colleges , are for Presbytery , or in Honour or Conscience can be ; we conclude , That Scottish Presbytery is not agreeable to the mind of that People . FINIS . The CONTENTS . Quest. 1. Concerning the time of the first settlement of Presbytery in Scotland . pag. ● Quest. 2. Concerning the manner of the settlement 〈◊〉 Presbytery in Scotland , in the Reigns of K. Ja. V● and Charles I. pag. ● Quest. 3. Concerning the Principles of Scottish Presbytery in reference to Dissenters , pag. ● Quest. 4. Concerning the Separation of Scotch Presbyterians from the Episcopal Church since the Year 1662. p. ● Quest. 5. Concerning the Penal Laws against Scotch Presbyterians , since the Year 1663. pag. ●● Quest. 6. Concerning the Carriage of the Episcopal Clergy of Scotland , towards Dissenters , pag. ●● Quest. 7. Concerning the Carriage of the Episcopal Church of Scotland , in reference to the Penal Law against Papists . pag. ●● Quest. 8. Concerning the Carriage of Scotch Presbyterians , in reference to the Penal Laws against Papists . pag. 23. Quest. 9. Concerning the Principles of Scottish Presbytry , in referenee to the power of the King. pag. 25. Quest. 10. Concerning the mind of the people in Scotland , in reference to the Presbyterian Government in the Church . pag. 28. FINIS . Notes, typically marginal, from the original text Notes for div A35430-e370 K. Iames 6. Parl. 1. Act. 2 , 3 , 8. Spotswood's 3 Book Spotswood Book 3. p. 152. Book 6. p. 289. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . lib. 2. p. ●8 . Lond. Ed. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , l. 2. Spotswood 6 Book . K. Charles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , 17 Chap. August 30. 1639. Aug 1639. Aug. 1643. May 1644. A●g . 164● . 〈…〉 An. 1661. Aug. 1647. Feb. 1645. K. Ch. 2. Parl. 1. Act. 7 , 9 , 10. K. Ch. 2. Parl. 1. Sess. 2. Act. 1. K. Ch. 2. Parl. 1. Sess. 3. Act. 2. K. Ch. 2 Parl. 2. Ses. 2. Act. 4. K. Ch. 2. Parl. 2. Ses. 2. Act. 5. K. Ch. 2. Parl. 1. Act. 2. Aug. 1648. K. Ch. II. Part. 1. Act. 3. Iuly 1648. Iuly 28. 1648. Iune 3. 1644. K. Ch. 2. Part. 1. Act. 5. Feb. 12. 1645.