Observations touching the principles of natural motions, and especially touching rarefaction & condensation together with a reply to certain remarks touching the gravitation of fluids / by the author of Difficiles nugae. Hale, Matthew, Sir, 1609-1676. 1677 Approx. 299 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 152 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2009-03 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A44236 Wing H252 ESTC R8786 11806076 ocm 11806076 49448 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A44236) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 49448) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 495:12) Observations touching the principles of natural motions, and especially touching rarefaction & condensation together with a reply to certain remarks touching the gravitation of fluids / by the author of Difficiles nugae. Hale, Matthew, Sir, 1609-1676. [14], 285 p. : ill. Printed by W. Godbid, for W. Shrowsbury ..., London : 1677. The author of Difficiles nugae was Matthew Hale. Reproduction of original in Huntington Library. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Religion and science. Motion. Gravitation. Hydrodynamics. 2008-03 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2008-04 SPi Global Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2008-05 John Pas Sampled and proofread 2008-05 John Pas Text and markup reviewed and edited 2008-09 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion OBSERVATIONS Touching the PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL MOTIONS ; And especially touching Rarefaction & Condensation : TOGETHER WITH A REPLY to certain REMARKS touching the Gravitation of FLUIDS . By the Author of DIFFICILES NVGAE . LONDON , Printed by W. Godbid , for W. Shrowsbury , at the Bible in Duke-Lane , 1677. The Right Hon. ble Algernon Capell , Earl of Essex , Viscount Maldon , and Baron Capell of Hadham : 1701. TO THE READER . READER , ABout Two or Three Years since , I was content that Two Small Books , or rather Pamphlets , that I had collected , partly in my Youth , and partly at the Recreations of leisure hours , should be published in Print ; The one Entituled , An Essay touching the Gravitation of Fluids ; The other , Difficiles Nugae , or , Observations touching the Torricellian Experiment . In the Publishing of them , I did not set them off with any Ostentation ; but let them go with uninviting Titles , and not so much as bestowed upon them my Name : For I thought that they were but Trifles , and such as were below the Perusal of the Learned men of the Age , and at best , a Divertisement of some leisure-hours , to young Students in Matters of this Nature . But beyond my expectation , these Nugae ( for so I must still call them ) had the unexpected honour to be perused and examined by Two especially of the most Learned Masters in Philosophy and Mathematicks , that this latter Age hath yielded ; and not only so , but they have given them the honour to make Observations , Animadversions and Remarks upon them . Those which came out first were short and obiter , upon occasion of another Discourse , which gave opportunity of a short Defence . Those that came out since , were more large . The Nameless Author of the Essay and Nugae , doth return to them his thankful Acknowledgment of thoir Favour , in taking Notice of such Trifles , and using them and the unknown Author with that Civility that they have expressed in their Remarks . The truth is . the Controversie falls to be of that Nature , that among the Three Contenders , every one opposeth somewhat that the other two grant ; and asserts somewhat that the other two deny : For instance , I contend against the solving of the Phaenomena in the Torricellian Experiment , by the weight or Elasticity of the Air , or by a common Spirit of Nature ; but that it is done Mechanically by Tension . My first Opponent supposeth it not done by Tension , nor the common Spirit of Nature , but by the Weight and Elasticity of the Air. The Third contends that it is neither done by the Elasticity or weight of the Air , nor by Tension ; but by the Spirit of Nature . Thus every one agrees and disagrees with the other ; and every Opponent in one kind , is in another kind the Advocate of the Party he opposeth . And this will both assist and justifie me , in writing in the farther Explication and Application of what I have asserted ; which I shall do with plainness and freeness : but without Arrogance to my self , as if I had wholly confuted my Opponents ; or detraction from my Opponents , or their Assertions , by censuring them as absurd or contradictory . For in those cases , the Judgment is the Readers , not the Opponents . In Philosophical Enquiries and Conclusions , we may observe two kinds of Methods used by some men . Some begin at their Senses , examine particular Matters of Facts , how they are , or fall out , search into Experiments and visible Trials , and those Appearances of Nature that are obvious to our Senses , and from these they deduce their Conclusions and Theorems . And certainly he that attentively reads Aristotle , especially in his History of Animals , of their Parts , Going and Generation , in his Meteorologicks , in his Books De Anima ; yea , in his very Physicks , will find , that as he was the greatest Master of Experience and Observation of this kind , so it was the great Method of his Deductions and Conclusions . And therefore they that when they would seem to cry up Experimental Philosophy , think they do but right in decrying Aristotle , either have not considered him , or surely are too injurious to him . Again , There are some that lay the first Foundations of their Philosophy in Notions , and Speculations , and preconceived Systemes of their own framing ; and then conforming the Solution of the Phaenomena in Nature , to those Notions . And these most commonly do by Nature and Natural Appearances , as that Tyrant did by his Prisoners that were too long or too short for his Iron Bed ; stretched the latter , and cut the former to its dimension ; so these handle the Phaenomena in Nature ; torture and torment them into a consonancy to their Notions ; or at best , substitute new precarious Notions to piece out their Hypotheses , and to render sensible Appearances to hold analogy with that Notional Systeme of things that they have framed : And I must needs say , that I think the general Mode and Fashion of the reassumed Philosophy of Lucretius , Epicurus and Democritus , the Restitution and Reformation of it by Des Cartes and Gassendus , hath too much of this latter Method in it , and is a very uncertain and preposterous way of forming Conclusions . I have therefore chosen the former of these Methods , and as near as I can , framed my Conclusions from the evidence of Sense and particular Experiences and Experiments . And although it is not impossible for me to be mistaken in some of my Experiments , and the Inferences made thereupon ; yet I think I have not much mistaken herein ; only one Experiment , which I call a double Trial , pag. 84. of the Difficiles Nugae , is somewhat obscurely delivered by me , and not so much to my purpose ; of which I take notice in my Reply to the 6 th Remark upon that Book . I have in the Beginning of this Book spent Ten chapters touching the Principles of Motion , Essential Forms , Rarefaction and Condensation ; which have a general influence into much of what is said concerning those matters , which often occur in the Remarks ; and thereby I at once give my sense concerning those difficult points , and save my self the labour of often Repetitions or Answers touching things therein delivered . The Subject of the Controversie , I confess , is of no great importance , neither is the fortune of Greece ( as the Proverb is ) concerned whether of the Controverters Suppositions be the truest ; or whether , it may be , some other may be discovered truer than any of the former . All that I shall say touching our Discourses of this nature , is this , That though they are not very profitable expences of time in the Writers or Readers ; yet they may be innocent Diversions to both , and may be of some use in the indagation of Natural Causes and Effects . Some Favours I must desire of the Reader . 1. That he will be contented to bear with such vulgar Expressions which serve my turn to give account of my Thoughts in a Matter of this Nature ; such as are , Architecture , Cones , Capes , Masonry , and twenty such vulgar Expressions , which , it may be , Learned men may think too mean , and repeat them with some disdain . 2. That though I do many times use Expressions that are not polished according to Grammatical or Scholastick Niceties or Modes , that I may be excused herein , and that the Reader will look to the Scope and Drift ; and mark at what I aim ; and not cavil at bare Terms and Expressions , so long as the thing they design be laid open : This is an unhappiness that too often befals men that are inquisitive after Truth ; that their Readers or Opponents miss the scope of the Writer , and fall upon Criticismes about Words and Forms of Expressions . Words are but Signs of Conceptions and Thoughts ; and as I have elsewhere said , they perform their Office well enough , when they render our Thoughts intelligible . 3. That he will be content to suspend his Censure upon Clauses or Sentences apart , till he hath perused all : It is not possible , especially in Discourses of this Nature , to speak or write all at once . Some things that are but shortly or obscurely delivered , or perchance omitted in one Sentence , Page , or Paragraph , may be supplied or explained in another . The CONTENTS . CHap. 1. Concerning Motion , and its Original . Pag. 1 Chap. 2. A farther Disquisition touching the immediate Cause of Motion . Pag. 7 Chap. 3. Concerning some other more universal or common Causes assigned to Motions , viz. Anima Mundi , Spiritus Naturae , & Principia Hylarchica . Pag. 25 Chap. 4. Touching Rarefaction and Condensation , and their Kinds . Pag. 36 Chap. 5. Concerning the Phaenomena of Rarefaction and Condensation apparent to Sense . Pag. 49 Chap. 6. Concerning the various Solutions of Condensation and Rarefaction ; and first , of that which is by supposed interspersed Vacuities . Pag. 55 Chap. 7. Concerning the Second Solution of Rarefaction and Condensation , and its insufficiency . Pag. 67 Chap. 8. Further Considerations concerning the Deficiency of the Second Solution in relation to Rarefaction and Condensation , and the Supplements that have been devised to enforce or supply it . Pag. 77 Chap. 9. Touching the Third Supposition of the Method of Rarefaction and Condensation according to the Ancient Philosophy , which seems to be the truest . Pag. 87 Chap. 10. A further Consideration of Rarefaction and Condensation , and of the Supposition of the Penetrability or Impenetrability of Bodies , Material Substances , Quantity , Extension , &c. Pag. 108 ERRATA . PAg. 39. l. 4. dele appearing . p. 43. l. 10. r. it it makes spaces . p. 63. l. 25. abstracted , r. obstructed . p. 64. l. 18. r. and with great ease , if the supposition be true . p. 65. l. 15. more , r. mere . p. 89. l. 20. Tube , r. Cube . p. 94. l. 23. dele actual . p. 95. l. 13. cancelled , r. cantelled . p. 106. l. 7. r. passion or quality of . p. 131. l. 21. r. in Condensation . p. 189. l. 6. r. preponderation . p. 192. l. 25. Ballance , r. Bottom . p. 204. l. 20. some , r. sense . p. 239. l. 24. r. preponderated . p. 276. l. 17. r. foreign . OBSERVATIONS Touching the Principles of Natural Motions ; and especially touching RAREFACTION and CONDENSATION . CHAP. I. Concerning Motion , and its Original . AS an Introduction to what follows , I shall briefly set down some Observations touching Motion of Created Material Beings ; for I shall not in this place meddle with those more Noble Beings of Angelical or Spiritual Natures , nor the Humane Soul , which is a Subject of another and higher nature , and not to be measured by those ordinary Rules or Reasons that concern Bodies , Matter , and Material Natures . We may generally find in all Material Beings the thing called Motion ; in some of one kind , in some of another ; some more simple , some more complexed and various ; some more conspicuous to sense , as Local Motion ; some less conspicuous , as Generation and Alteration ; some things are moved by others , some things seem to have the Principle or Original of motion in themselves , which communicates motion to the Subject wherein that Principle resides , and also to other things by contact of their corporeity or virtue . And therefore Aristotle somewhere as I remember , calls motion or endeavours of it , to be quasi vita quaedam quae omnibus inest , quae Natura constant . The primitive Principle or Cause of all Motion is the first Mover , the great and glorious Lord of Nature , from whom , as being so , all Motion is derived into created Beings . 1. By way of causality ; those created Beings that seem to have the immediate Principle of Motions in themselves , have that Principle from his Fiat and Institution . And , 2. By way of Concurrence and Concomitance . There is a perpetual flux from that Fountain of Being that preserves and sustains those Principles of Motion which he at first lodged in created Beings , according to their several ranks , kinds and natures , and instituted Durations ; and if this Concourse should withdraw it self but one moment , all the Motion of created Beings would cease and expire . Matter it self simply considered as such , though it be susceptive of Motion ( as we daily see ) is not the immediate principle of Motion in those subjects that seem to be self-moving , or primitive Movents of other things , according to that Law of Nature instituted by the Soveraign Lord thereof . And this seems apparent , among other Reasons , by these that follow . 1. Because Matter in it self , and simply considered , seems to be meerly passive , and receptive of active impressions from something else : It is true , one portion of Matter once set in Motion , will by contact put another portion of Matter into Motion . But we are not now upon the search of intermediate Instrumentals of Motion , but upon the search of the Principles of such Motions which seem primitively and immediately to be elicited in any Physical Subject . 2. Because Matter simply considered , seems to be one kind of uniform Entity , but diversified by its Forms , Qualities and Modifications , as Weight , Colour , Hardness , Softness , &c. The Matter of a piece of Gold , and of a piece of Wood , abstractively considered , seems to be the Materia prima of the Ancients , and of the same nature ; and consequently , if Matter simply considered were the immediate active principle of Motion , the Motions of all things would be as simple and uniform as the Matter it self . But we see by daily experience that there are Motions of several Subjects , which have the immediate principle of their Motion in and from themselves , or somewhat within them that obtains vicem Moventis , and are various , differing , differently exerted , and differently terminated from the Motions of other Bodies . Therefore if there be any things in Nature , that have their Principle of Motion in themselves , we must find out if we can , somewhat besides Matter , that is the immediate root or spring of it . It is true , the great Master in Natural Philosophy , Aristotle , tells us , that whatsoever is moved , is moved by another , which would make one suppose that he thought there were no immediate self-moving principle in those Beings we call Automata , but only the first Mover ; and truly with respect to the Soveraign Cause of all things , that every thing is moved by him that is unmoveable , as I have before shewed , cannot be questioned . But that there are created Beings , that by the powerful and soveraign Institution of Almighty God , have an immediate Principle of Motion in and from themselves , is beyond Dispute . A Brute Beast possibly may be put immediately into Motion by his Appetite , and that Appetite excited by the presence of an Object ; and here the Object hath ( as I may call it ) a Moral Principle of Motion exciting the Appetite , moving the Brute to a nearer approach to the Object . But then in the Gressus Brutalis , it is somewhat within him that gives the Local Motion it self , namely , the Brutalis Anima . And the same is evident in the Motions of Augmentation and Conformation of Vegetables , the motions of Ascent and Calefaction in Fire , the Motions of Attraction and Aversation in Magnetical Bodies , and the very Motion of Descent in heavy Bodies ; and infinite more instances of Physical Bodies , which have an intrinsick principle of exciting and communicating Motion to the Subjects of their inexistence , and to other things : Now touching this internal immediate principle of Motion , is this Enquiry upon which I am . CHAP. II. A farther Disquisition touching the immediate Cause of Motion . IN the former Chapter I have supposed these two things . 1. That there are some things that have an active self-moving Principle lodged within them . 2. That Matter simply considered , is not that immediate self-moving Principle : It remaines therefore to be enquired what that Principle is . The ancient Bi-partition of created Beings was into Substance and Accident . But this seems to me to be too narrow ( I am still speaking of created material Existences ) and I shall not be ashamed to own Helmont for my Instructer herein , because he speaks with great evidence of Reason . There seems therefore to be a third kind of Existence or Entity participating in some respect of the nature of both , and yet differing in other respects from both ; for indeed it is an Entity among created Beings belonging to Matter , far more noble than either of the two former , and is that which giveth Life , Vigor , Activity , and Motion , immediately next under the Lord of Nature , to every self-moving Being . And this Entity I call Vis , or Virtus activa , superadded to Matter , and giving immediately those Motions to it , that are specifically appropriate to that Vis , or Virtus Activa , and without which , Matter would be stupid , dull , unactive , and alwayes at rest in it self , unless accidentally moved ab extrinseco . And although those Vires or Virtutes activae , the immediate Principles of Motion in such things as are Automata , are various , and infinitely diversified , yet I shall instance but in few ; which nevertheless will be sufficient to render my self intelligible in what I say . And those are principally of two sorts ; the first of those ( the noblest below the humane Soul ) are those Vires , or Virtutes Essentiales , that are the principal Constituents of vital or substantial Forms . The second are those which are usually called active qualities , which seem to be of a lower nature and allay than the former . Under the first of these Ranks , there are different Classes , not only gradually , but essentially more or less perfect than others , viz. first , the Vis sentiens & animalis of Animals . 2. The Vis vegetans & vitalis of Vegetables , and possibly of many Minerals . 3. The Vis combustiva & calefactiva of Fire . 4. The Vis attractiva , directiva & communicativa of Magnetical Bodies . These Virtutes or Vires Essentiales even of the noblest sort ( I mean below the humane nature ) have this preheminence above the Matter or Substance whereunto they are united , that they are the immediate , vital , movent principle , that gives a kind of Life or Motion to the Subject wherein they exist , which would otherwise be destitute of Life or Motion from it self . Whether these Vires or Virtutes Essentiales are in themselves defectible or not , may be questioned : some have thought that they have certain Termini Temporales of their Existence , and Operations in themselves simply and abstractively considered , and in process of time languish and finally expire and cease , as the energy of the Spring of a Watch in its evolution , grows languid , and at last utterly ceaseth from any farther evolution or motion . Others have thought , and with great evidence of Reason , that there is no decay or natural termination of the Vis or Energia Essentialis it self , but only by the decay or defectibility , or dissolution of the material Hypostasis to which it is united , or of the Organs which it useth in its operations ; which being compounded Bodies , are subject to decay and dissolution . And therefore the Philosopher tells us , that if an old man had a young mans eye , he would see as well as in his Youth ; for the decay is not in the Visive Faculty , or Vis or Virtus Essentialis sentiens ; but in the Organ , or Subject , or Substratum of its Operation or Inexistence . But in some respects it is inferiour to Matter , and seems to participate of the nature of Accidents ; as for instance , It necessarily according to the common Laws of Nature , requires a material Hypostasis or Subject in which it may inexist , and to which it may be united : thus the Vis Sentiens & Animalis is immediately united to the Animal Spirits , or the most refined parts of the Animal Nature . The Vis Vegetans Vitalis of Vegetables is immediately united to the Vital Spirits and Succus Vitalis of Vegetables . As to Fire , whether the Vis Ignea have a proper Hypostasis of its own to which it is united ( as the Vis Sentiens hath ) or whether it hath no other Substratum but the Body in which it is , as the Cole or Iron , or as the common Body of the Air it self , through which it is universally diffused , may , I confess , be questionable ; yet certainly it hath some Hypostasis , to which it is united , and primitively inexists , and without which , it seems it cannot be . 2. Whereas no portion of Matter is lost in Nature , or annihilable but by Omnipotence , those Vires Essentiales are in their individuals extinguished and lost , and no where in Nature upon the destruction , dissipation or dissolution of the necessary Hypostasis or Subject of their inexistence : When the Animal Spirits are wholly dissipated or dissolved , the Vis Sentiens of that Animal is lost , and no where : When water is thrown upon the Cole of Fire , the Vis Ignea that was in it , is extinct and nullibi , and ( as it seems ) doth not facessere in elementum commune Ignis , at least if it have not a special Hypostasis of its own to which it is united ; and when the Magnet is burnt in the Fire , the Vis Magnetica in it is extinct . And the same is to be said of that other more ignoble Principle of Motion hereafter mentioned , viz. Active Qualities . And this , as I think , gives us a true notion of the Souls of Brutes , the Forms of Vegetables , of Fire , and other substantial Forms below the humane Soul. If any should ask me what I take the Soul of a brute animal to be , I should say , it consisted of two essential parts ; the one , this active Vis , or Virtus Sentiens Animalis , the Root and Fountain of all its motions , of Sensation , Perception , Phantasie , Appetition , and Local Motion . And the other is the immediate Hypostasis or Substratum in which this Vis Vitalis Sentiens ▪ primitively inexists , and to which it is primitively united , and by which it communicates it self to the whole Compositum ; and these are some select Crasis or Portion of the Animal Spirits : For the Animal Nature being a more curious piece than inferiour Subsistences , and fuller of variety , therefore there is a more elaborate and curious method of the union of its Essentials than in others : And next to Animals , there is a more curious method of union and colligation of the Virtus Vitalis of Vegetables to the more pure and subtil vital Spirits , or Latex Vitalis of Vegetables . But the Vis Ignea and the Vis Magnetica seem to be immediately united to the whole Fiery or Magnetical Mass : But yet still the activity of both is owing not to the bare Hypostasis or Substratum wherein it is lodged , but to that incorporeal force , virtue or energy which acts in it , upon it and by it . And upon this accompt Aristotle is to be understood , when in 1. De Anima , he stiles the Souls of Brutes to be incorporeal , and yet in other places calls them substantial , viz. they are immaterial and incorporeal with relation to the Vis or Virtus Essentialis activa , which is the regnant and noblest part of them ; but they are substantial , and not only so , but material in relation to the prima Hypostasis or Primum Substratum , the Animal Spirits , whereunto this Vis Activa is united , or rather some Nodus or concrement of a refined Substance , which is as it were the root or Focus of these Spirits , that like so many Branches , are derived from it , through the Nerves , and by them communicated to the whole Compositum . And although I do here industriously omit the Examination of the Nature of the Humane or Reasonable Soul ; yet I cannot omit this special observation of the discrimination of the Humane Soul from the Souls of Brutes , viz. that although the appropriate faculties of the Sentient or Animal Soul be admitted indefectible in themselves , yet their prima Hypostasis , or immediate subject of their inexistence is corruptible , and subject to dissipation ; but the appropriate powers or faculties of the reasonable Soul , namely , Intellect and Will , are not only indefectible powers , but also the prima Hypostasis or primum Substratum of their inexistence is by the Divine Ordination an indefectible Substratum ; namely a pure , immaterial and incorruptible Substance , and the union thereunto indissoluble ; whereby it comes to pass that the Humane Soul is immortal , and preserved both in its Essence , Existence , Personality and in duration after the dissolution of the Body . 1. It s Virtus or Vis is indefectible . 2. The Prima Hypostasis incorruptible . 3. The Union of both indissoluble by natural power . And thus far concerning the first sort of Active Principles in self-moving Automata . 2. The second sort of motive Principles are Active Qualities , as they are commonly called ; which , though possibly some of them may be the same with the former , essentiating Active Forms , yet some may be such as are of a second and more inferiour allay , as proceeding from the primitive forms themselves . I shall instance in two only . 1. In that of Heat . 2. In that of Gravity . As to the former , it is evident that Heat ( not only that which is so to the touch , but is such virtually , as in Vegetables and Minerals ) hath a power of exciting Motion both in the Subject of its inexistence , and in other Subjects , as appears in the Fermentation of Liquors and other things which are put into motion by that virtual heat that resides in its particles , though not hot to the touch . Whether Cold be of any positive nature , and so have a positive activity of its own , or whether it be an absence only of heat , either totally , as in summè frigidis , if any such be ; or partially , according to the degrees of heat abated or removed , I shall not here dispute ; for I only propound some Instances , to render what I write intelligible . 2. As to Gravity , or that Principle in heavy bodies that inclines them ab intrinseco , to descend , this seems to be a quality of most tangible bodies that we converse with , if not of all ; for some contend that there is no such thing in nature as simple Levity ( at least in any thing but Fire ) but only some bodies are minus gravia than others , and urged to ascend by the pressure or circumpulsion of other bodies more heavy ; this is not my business at this time to examine . This Gravity I take to be a quality intrinsick to heavy bodies at least , in our inferiour System of the world . Gravitation , which is a kind of second act , may not altogether improperly be applied to motions of different terminations , because it seems to be only nisus or conatus ad motum , which may have different terminations ; viz. upward , or downward , or laterally , and arise from different causes ; but Gravity it self , as it imports a disposition , propension or inclination in heavy bodies to descend , is not unfitly stiled a quality , and an intrinsick quality . For we may observe in the motions of natural bodies , some are from an extrinsecal cause or accidental ; sometimes arising from the pressure of other bodies , sometimes from the position of the bodies themselves ; as Water will be driven up perpendicularly by a forcer ; as in Water-Engines ; it will move collaterally or per declive , by reason of its own fluid nature , or by its position upon a declining Plain . But when all Obstacles of that nature are removed , a heavy body , as such , will move by a right Line to the Center , from that inherent quality of gravity , which is intrinsick to it , and puts it into motion ; so that I am unjustly blamed for saying Gravity is a quality inclining bodies to descend to the Center , and yet at the same time saying , that it is not improper to say that things may gravitate upward or laterally , as well as downward ; for when heavy bodies have another termination than downward , it is by reason of some other intervention of some external cause , or from some other property in bodies , accompanying their Gravity , as Fluidity in Water or Air , which gives them a Nisus ad motum ( which is gravitation ) of a differing termination from that of bodies purely considered as heavy . But when the motion proceeds simply and solely from that active quality of gravity , its nisus ad motum , which is its gravitation , is simply in linea recta ad centrum , which I often call a central motion or direction : This any fair Remarker might have easily seen , without charging the Second Chapter of the Essay with a contradiction , where indeed there is none . And therefore in this place I cannot chuse but take notice of two extreams in the modern Philosophy : Some are so wholly intent upon vital and plastick Principles , that they contend even almost against all Mechanical motions of Bodies , which I shall have occasion hereafter to meet with . Again , Others are so greatly taken up with the thoughts of Matter and Mechanical Motions , that they wholly exterminate any intrinsick Principles of motion , and resolve them wholly into Matter and its modifications , and Mechanism and Mechanical motions ; and therefore , 1. They suppose that there are no such things as I call Active Forms ( at least excepting the Humane Soul , though some venture hard at that also ) but that all Active Forms and their Originals are only various modifications of Matter , as Size , Figure , Position , Texture , &c. This I think is impossible to be true ; for though the Modifications of Matter may give variety of accidental or external Forms , naturally arising from the texture of Matter , as Figure , Colour , &c. And those various modifications may in relation not only to the powers of the Sentient Faculty , but to other Bodies , make various impressions , as we see is done in some tangible effects ; as by smoothness , roughness , hardness , softness , sharpness , bluntness , and the like : whereby sometimes other bodies are affected ; yet they can never arrive to those greater activities which we see in Physical Bodies , as Sense , Life , Primitive Motions of several kinds , nor can be productive of the principles thereof ; for the modifications of Matter can never raise it to such an activity , as of it self it is not capable of , but requires the union of some nobler active entity to quicken and actuate it . 2. They suppose that all the most noble motions , as well of Sense as Life in Animals and Vegetables , are nothing else but Mechanism , and not from any intrinsick active principle , which we usually call the sentient and vegetable Soul ; nay , some by a vain petulancy have gone so far as to resolve the noble faculties and motions of the rational Soul , as Intellection , Ratiocination and Memory , into a bare Mechanism , and Modification , and Motion of Particles of Matter , such extravagancies as these need no other confutation but our very Senses , in the observation of the curious properties , instincts , operations and motions of the animal and vegetable souls and faculties , and the unevident and unintelligible explications that these men offer for the support of their Suppositions ; which is not my business here at large to examine . Now touching the production of these active self-moving Principles , which I call Vires , or Virtutes activae . 1. As to their primitive institution and production , there cannot possibly , as I think , be assigned any other than that constitution , institution and communication which they received from the great Creator of all things , and that Law which he annexed and gave them in their first formation . 2. But as to the subsequent and physical production of these active principles , in the common and ordinary track of Nature , they are various , according to the methods setled by the same Divine Law ; such as are Generation , the Irradiation of the Heavens and Heavenly Bodies , especially the Sun , the various mixtures of simple and compounded bodies , and therewith of their essential Forms and active Qualities , whereby there arise many times such Forms and Qualities as are sometimes called equivocal , anomalous , or of various modifications . But the origination of Forms and Active Qualities , is a large Theme , and not intended to be prosecuted farther by me in this place . CHAP. III. Concerning some other more universal or common Causes assigned of Motions , viz. Anima Mundi , Spiritus Naturae , & Principia Hylarchica . TO solve or give an account of divers motions in Nature , there have been those , that not content with the particular inherent active Principles in particular Subjects , as is mentioned in the former Chapters , have supposed certain more Catholick , and indeed nobler Existences , that manage the various Phaenomena in the Universe . Plato and his School and after him , the Arabian Philosophers , especially Avicen , supposed an intelligent Nature subordinate to Almighty God , to preside and manage the Universe ; which they call Anima Mundi , as they assign one common intelligent Nature , and depute it to the excitation , action and regiment of the humane Soul in his intellective operation , which they call intellectus Agens . Others that have assigned several Systemes of the world , each having a special Province , which they stile Vortices , or Systemata , assign a certain common intelligent Nature to be , as it were , the common Soul of every particular Vortex , and thus our Vortex , whose Center they suppose to be the Sun , and the terms of extent to reach the remotest Limits of Saturn , and his Orb hath its Anima vorticis for the regiment of the Phaenomena and motions within that Vortex . Others again have substituted another Principle , not altogether unlike the first ; but differing in name , and some qualifications . This they call Principium Hylarchicum , and sometimes Spiritus Naturae , which though they make not an intelligent being , yet they make it plastick , vital , incorporeal , and possibly sentient ; but howsoever accommodated to the regiment of Matter in the best and most orderly and convenient way ; and this I take it , they suppose a subordinate regent principle , somewhat resembling the Archeus of Helmont , which is supposed a middle principle , intervening between the Souls of Animals and their Body , and an immediate active instrument in its motions and operations . If by this Principium Hylarchicum , these men would understand the Soveraign Creator and Lord of the world ( as many of the Ancients understood the Anima mundi ) who is intimately present with all his Works , and by a continual influx supports them in their being and motions , according to the most wise Laws and Institutions that he hath established for them and fixed in them : Or if by the Spiritus Naturae they understand those active essential Virtues communicated to every created Being by the Glorious God , and that statuminated Law , and Order , and Method , and Oeconomy which he hath given them , and according to which those active principles which he hath planted in them , do exert and operate ; this will be readily agreed to them as most rational , and in a great measure evident , not only to our Reason , but to our very Sense and Experience , and the Dispute about words , would cease , and be at rest . But the substitution of such a vicarious , immaterial , common Principle , to regulate , order , excite and govern Matter , and its motions subordinate to Almighty God , a common Spirit , and different from the particular active principles variously implanted in Physical Bodies , though it be a pleasant supposition , yet it is difficult , if not impossible to evince to any tolerable satisfaction . Only I must needs say , that as Suppositions of this nature , that are founded upon Notions , are for the most part unaccessible by those common Media whereby things are to be proved to humane understanding ; so upon the same account they are difficult to be confuted : If any man should tell me that the Moon were a Globe of Water , as he could never prove it , so I could never disprove it , unless I had such Media of access to that Body , that could to my Sense and Experience confute it ; and therefore in such cases the proof must be cast upon the assertor Yet there seem to be some things that render this Supposition not very credible . 1. That it seems an unnecessary multiplication of beings , whose Offices are well enough supplied without them ; namely , by the energy of the glorious God , and those special active Principles that he hath lodged in almost all created Natures , and those Institutions and Laws that he hath alligated and annexed to the particular Works of his Creation , and the Systemes and Syntaxes of the World. 2. But principally upon a strict examination , it will appear that most of these Phaenomena in nature and motion , are performed by the active principles , residing in particular Subjects , or by the usual and necessary Mechanism of bodies , without our calling to their immediate performance this supposed Spirit of nature . 3. Again , It is very difficult to form to our selves a notion of this Spirits Nature , that may have any probable certainty : let us take but these few difficulties . 1. Is it a distinct , self-subsisting Spirit , separated from Matter ? or is it a kind of common Soul or Form residing in the Universe , as the Soul of a Brute resides in his Body , and united to it by a wonderful union ? If it be the former , it is a kind of Angelick Nature , not united to Matter , but acting separately upon it , subsisting without it , and is in all probability an Intelligence . If the latter , it were fit to know whether it were an immaterial Form , as the Humane Soul ; and then perchance we should give it too great a preference : Or is it a material Form , as that of Brutes ? And then it will be worth knowing whether it hath the like perfection of Sense , or be of a lower allay , and only vital , like those of Vegetables . Or is it a kind of connatural Sense , suted to all material Beings , together with a sentient perception and appetite , proportionate to the Nature of every material or substantial created being , as Campanella and our learned Countriman hath lately asserted . Whatever it be , we are perfectly in the dark to form any conception of it with any tolerable evidence or satisfaction . Again 2. Are there other particular or specifical Forms in the severall Classes of material Existences , as Animals , Vegetables , Minerals , &c. that exert the several operations that seem specifical to their Natures , but individuated in the several individual existences , Or is this common spirit of Nature that which exerts all these Operations which are therefore only diversified by the diversification of the compositions of those bodies in which and through which they are exerted , as the common Bellows in the Organ ; and the breath thereof gives the various sounds in the Organ-Pipe , according to their Figures , Stops or Amplitudes ? If we suppose the former , we seem to multiply Entities without necessity ; if the latter , we destroy all that we are building , and make all the Animals , and Vegetables , and Material Beings in the Universe ( if this Spirit be universal ) or in this lower World ( if singly belonging to this Systeme ) to be nothing else but pure mechanical pieces , without any sentient or vital principle of their own , but only are the dead Tools and Instruments of this spirit of Nature ; such difficulties as these would be cleared , to give us some Idea or probable fixed notion of this Spirit of Nature , or Hylarchical Principle . But now if we should suppose the interposition of this common Spirit of Nature in some Phaenomena or motions of particular Bodies , yet it seems necessary for us to suppose these two things in the exertions thereof . 1. That it doth not immediately interpose , unless upon great emergencies , and to deliver the things of Nature from some important inconvenience , which without so effectual an interposition would befall them ; as to preserve the continuity of the parts of the Universe , or avoid vacuity , and the like , and not upon those little occasions which are of no consideration and importance , whether they be relieved or supplied or not ; such as are the emergency of a Rundle of light Wood from the bottom of the Water , or the sustaining of a weight , or attraction by the Embolus of a Syringe or Air-Pump , or the keeping up of the Valve or Operculum in the lower end of a Tube immersed in Water . These and the like Instances are of so small concernment to the good of the Universe , or to the Nature of Physical Bodies , that they were scarce worthy the access of the noble Spirit of Nature ; Nodi vix tali vindice digni . 2. That if this Spirit of Nature doth at any time interpose , yet it rarely , if at all , acts by violent or convulsive motions , but pacately , and as much as may be , in consonance to the regular disposition of Bodies ; and therefore it is , that even in Animals , where their motion is exerted by a clear , internal , vital , sentient principle , it doth for the most part act regularly , and in the best Mechanism imaginable , their Bodies , Nerves , Bones , Muscles are ordered by a rare and excellent Mechanism for the exerting of those motions , and the motions themselves performed by those Organs , by the explosion and retraction of the Spirits in their several vessels , with admirable order and artifice , as will appear to any that will bestow the pains to read Galen , De usu Partium , and Aristotle , De Gressu Animalium ; and therefore we have much more reason to think that this supposed noble Spirit , the Spirit of Nature , acts not at random , or convulsively , or irregularly , but according to the best Rules and mechanical methods applicable to such motions as it doth occasionally exert . So that if we should never so much allow of the Spirit of Nature , and its interpositions , yet still the necessary instruments , modes and methods of its motion according to Mechanical Rules , must still be sought after . For it would be a pitiful refuge for a man pretending to Philosophy , to give this general solution to all Phaenomena of Nature , that this is so , because the Spirit of Nature thus orders it ; without giving some probable account of the particular means or method by which the Spirit of Nature effects it , and likewise of the end , use and design of the Spirit of Nature in what it thus effects . CHAP. IV. Touching Rarefaction and Condensation , and their kinds . BEcause much hath been said by others touching Rarity and Density of Physical Bodies , which I call Affections , Passions or Qualities of Physical Bodies ; and it may be conducible to the solution of many Physical Phaenomena ; and to the clearing of my apprehensions concerning it , and to the answering of most of the Objections of any weight , made against the Suppositions which I have stated , in the two Pamphlets above mentioned , I will endeavour to give that account concerning this matter that seems reasonable to me ; though I must confess it is possibly one of the abstrusest Subjects in Natural Philosophy , wherein I shall observe as near as I can , this Method . 1. To consider the several consistence of Bodies . 2. To shew the various kinds of Rarefaction and Condensation of those Bodies . 3. To what kinds of Bodies , and to what kinds of Rarefaction and Condensation this Argument in hand is applicable ; that so we may come closer to the business in question , and speak ad idem . As to the first and second , Sir Francis Bacon in his Historia Densi & Rari , hath in a great measure fitted them to my hand ; whose Method I shall herein follow . 1. Of Bodies , some seem to be properly called Tangible , some Pneumatica ; which though they are not Spirits , nor void of Matter , no , nor yet totally imperceptible to the Touch , yet are more subtil , and less obvious by any gross contact , to that Sense , and therefore may be called Spiritalia . Of the former sort , some are more fixt , and of a more setled consistence , as Gold , Iron , Stone , Wood , &c. Others are fluid , either from the texture of their Nature ; as Water , Oyl , Mercury ; or by Art or Accident , as Gold , Silver , Lead , &c. in Fusion or Dissolution . Of the latter sort , viz. Pneumatica , there are several kinds , and of various degrees of exaltation , as Aether , Air , Flame , Spirits of Animals or Vegetables , Smoke , Vapors , &c. Although tangible Bodies may be capable of Rarefaction and Condensation , at least in some of the acceptations thereof hereafter described , yet I shall not much meddle with them , unless it be such as be fluid , because not to my present purpose ; and because what is hereafter said touching the Rarefaction or Condensation of some Fluids , and of those Pneumatica , will in some measure explicate somewhat concerning the Condensation or Rarefaction of other tangible Bodies . 2. Touching Rarefaction and Condensation , thus much first in general is to be said , Rarefaction is when the same Body , or at least portion of material Substance , takes up a greater external dimension , or a larger appearing trine dimension , viz. of breadth , length and depth than it had before . And on the contrary , Condensation is when the same Body or portion of material Substance takes up a less external dimension than it had before ; this may suffice as the common Phaenomenon of Rarefaction and Condensation , as it stands objected to our sense ; though when we come to particulars , this general sensible description of either will not serve alwayes the Subject , nor sufficiently explicate it . Some Appearances in Bodies look like Rarefaction , which indeed are not such , but only in appearance ; such as are Augmentation of Bodies by an unperceptible accession of new matter , as in Augmentation ; sometimes by assimilation of contiguous matter into its own consistence , sometimes by the apertures or distraction of the parts of a Body , and intrusion or intermission , or attraction of other Matter of a different Nature , Quality , or Texture , or of the same Nature , Quality or Texture with it self ; these are not truly those kinds of Rarefactions whereof our enquiry is instituted ; for though the Moles or Bulk seem to be extended and enlarged , yet the true Bulk of the same Matter is the same as before , though it may be under a different configuration or position . Again , on the contrary , some appearances in Bodies , look like Condensation ; but in truth are not such ; as when part of a Body is emitted either by perspiration or dissolution of some of its more subtil parts , whereby that which remaineth , taketh up less circuit or bulk , or where some of its parts are first subtilized , and then dismissed , and some other Instances of like kind may be given ; but these are not true and real Condensations ; for the entire matter remaines not in the Body condensed , as was before , but is diminished : These therefore are not the Rarefactions and Condensations whereof the Enquiry proceeds ; for the same Body in both instances hold the same true space it had before , though the extream appearing Limits seem to be altered . 3. The Question therefore in hand is , touching that kind of Rarefaction , where the same Body or portion of material Substance , without accession of more or other bodily matter , yet takes up a larger space than it did before . 2. And where it doth not only take up a larger exterior compass , circuit or superficies ; but where it also fills those intrinsick spaces which are within the circuit of that extent , as fully as it did before . For if for the purpose , a portion of Air of a Cubique Figure six inches square , do swell to a Cubique Dimension of seven inches square , yet if in that very dilatation there be as great a disjunction or divulsion of the parts of the Air within the cubique space of six inches , as amounts to that external accession of one inch , whereby it becomes a Cube of seven inches square , here is no true Rarefaction , nor is the space enlarged , but only the Figure of the same Body , and of its Extention altered . If an Artificer take a little Cylinder of Silver of two inches long , and half an inch round , and guild it , he will by his Art draw out this little Bar into 40 yards or more of fine Silver Thred , though the length be encreased , yet the breadth is diminished , and the Silver Thred takes up no more true extent of its trine dimension than it had before ; nay , which is remarkable , the extent of the Superficies of the Silver is not enlarged , though the figure be altered ; which appears by this , that every part of the Superficies of the Silver thred will continue guilt as it was in the Superficies of the Ingot . And upon the same account it is on the other side , when a Body or portion of material Substance is said truly to be condensed . 1. It must be the same portion of matter that was before , without any diminution of its parts , or of any matter in it that contributed to its former Moles . 2. The same matter without any diminution , must really take up less room or space than it did before ; for if it only take up a less Superficies or external extent , yet withal it makes up spaces or porosities within the compass of that external extent , which before was not filled by it self , but either was simply empty of any body , or only filled with such a body as now recedes , and gives way to the body supposed to be condensed , to take it up , then here is only a change of the space it had before , and of its configuration ▪ not a less space really taken up as commensurate to that body that is supposed to be condensed . So that the Question between the ancient and modern Philosophy , is not so much de modo , how Condensation or Rarefaction is made , as concerning the thing it self , whether really and truly there be any such thing or affection in bodies as Rarefaction and Condensation ; the latter Philosophy in truth denying the thing , when they give it such an explication as really and in truth consists not with it ; as we shall see hereafter . This being therefore the state of the Notion of Rarefaction and Condensation , in its true explication , we are to consider , what bodies , or motions in bodies are such as are applicable to the Argument in hand . The special Instances that I shall use are these . 1. The Rarefaction or Condensation of bodies by Transmutation ; thus Water by Rarefaction is sometimes changed into Air , which hath thereby a greater extension than it had before by about 900 times ; and Air by Condensation is changed into Water , and thereby loseth by contraction a like proportion of space than it had before . Thus Aristotle in 4. Phys . cap. 9. and the great Verulam , in Historia Densi & Rari , pag. 88. 2. The Rarefaction that is caused by external violence , as in the Air-Pump , in the Cacabus Evacuatorius , and the Magdeburg Engin , this is a Rarefaction by Tension , whereby the Air is dilated , not only in its external Bulk , but in all the parts of it , and in its internal , as well as external parts and dimensions . And thus Mersennus and others tell us , Air may be dilated to near 70 times its former and natural extent . 3. The Condensation that is made by Compression : Some there are that think Water is thus contractible and condensible by compression : The same Verulam , ubi supra , pag. 99. tells us , that taking a Leaden hollow Globe , and fill it with Water , and then strongly stop the Orifice which took in the Water , and compress the Globe in a strong Presser , whereby it may be reduced to an eighth part of its former dimension , the Water will sustain that contraction ; but if it be pressed farther , the Water will discharge it self through the Globe ad modum parvi imbris . It is not impossible but it might do so from its first compression , though the streams , by reason of their exility , were imperceptible to the Eye , as the emanation of effluvia through the pores of the bodies of Animals , electrical effluxes , or the Odors of Herbs ; for Water , though fluid , seems very impatient of Condensation by compression ; yet it is not impossible , if under a very strong pressure ; but to the very eye it appears capable of dilatation by Tension in its discharge of it self by Bubbles , upon a strong Tension . But howsoever it is with Water , it is apparent that Air is capable of condensation and contraction by compression ; this appears visibly in the compression of the Air by Wind-Guns , and the careful injection of water by a well ordered Syringe in an empty Aeolipile , so that Air by these means may be contracted into a seventh , nay possibly a seventieth part of its natural space or dimension . 4. The Rarefaction and consequential dilatation of Bodies by Heat or Fire : Thus Water it self is rarefied and extended into Vapours by Heat . The Lord Verulam , ubi supra , pag. 28. gives us a notable Instance , by taking a Vial-Glass holding an ounce , filling it half full of Spirit of Wine , then taking an empty Bladder that held about 8 pints , and tying it about the neck of the Vial strictly , the Spirit of Wine heated upon the Coals , the Aura Spiritus Vini filled the Bladder , and yet only six penny weight of the Spirit of Wine spent , which did not amount to the 40th . part of a pint , yet filled the Bladder of 8 pints with its rarified Air. And although this Instance be in the Spirit of Wine , which is fuller of subtil Matter than the like quantity of Water , yet it will hold its proportion with the Fumes or Vapours of Water . And of the like kind is the Rarefaction by Ignition in the Gunpowder , where a grain of Gunpowder fired , will expand above a thousand times its former dimension and more . But that which is most obvious to Sense , and most apposite to my purpose , and therefore will be the Subject of most of my ensuing applications , is , the Rarefaction of Air by heat , whereby it may gain an expansion of above 70 times its natural size and dimension , as is easily found by the strong heating of a strong Brass concave Globe , which if the included Air have no vent , will break it , and if it have a vent , and after it is strongly heated , cast into a Vessel of Water , it will soon discover the proportion of its dilatation by the contraction that it receives from the cold Water , and by the quantity of Water it sucks in upon that contraction . 5. The Condensation and consequential contraction that the Air receives by the constipation of it by Cold , especially after a strong dilatation ; but although there be no such preceding dilatation or expansion of the Air by heat , yet it is visible in Weather-Glasses , and other Engines of that nature , that the Air is contracted in its dimension , by the ambient Cold , from what it usually hath at other times . CHAP. V. Concerning the Phaenomena of Rarefaction and Condensation apparent to Sense . TO pursue all the Phaenomena of Condensation and Rarefaction in its full Latitude , were too long a business , and not so much conducible to my purpose : I shall therefore take up those Phaenomena that are apparently evident to Sense in the Rarefaction and Condensation of Air ; for the due discussion of that single Subject will give an estimate and explication of other Rarefactions and Condensations . 1. It is evident to our very Senses , that a smaller portion of Air , suppose a Cubique Foot in a Vessel , being ratified by heat , will take up a far greater space than it did before such application , and the like will be when it is done by Tension , as in the Air-Pump , and the Magdeburg-Engin ; for when a great part of the Air is driven out by Heat , in the one Instance , and drawn out by Traction , in the other ; yet it is evident to Sense , that the Receiver or other Vessel remains full of a very rare and extended Air ; for sensibly no other Substance supplies it . 2. It is evident to Sense , that this distension of the Air is not only in the Extima Superficies , but in all the very internal parts of it ; for it is apparent to our Sense , that it hath a visible effect as well upon the Birds , Water , or other Body , placed in the middle of the Cavity of the Receiver , as in those that are conterminous to the Sides of it , as appears in those many Instances given by Mr. B. especially in 21 , 22 , &c. Experiments . And unless the whole Body were extended every where and every way , it were impossible that a little portion of Air included in a Bladder , should encrease its bulk by Heat , to ten times its extension , as it will do , and is apparent to our Sight by the ample distention of the Bladder . 3. It is apparent to our Sense , that if the Air be rarified by Heat in any close Vessel , as the Heat , which is the cause of its Rarefaction , decays , so the Air endeavours its contraction , to gain its primitive size , which it then attains , when the Heat is perfectly gone out , if it be not impeded by the closeness of the Vessel . This is visible in Weather-Glasses of 22 inches long ; whereby , when for the purpose , the Water riseth to ten Inches , and leaves twelve inches of Air in the Head of the Glass , the warm hand laid upon the Head of the Glass , will depress the Water , by expanding the included Air two or three inches ; but the Hand being removed , the Air will contract it self to its former Staple , and so the Water will rise to ten , as before . 4. It is evident to Sense , that the Air contracting it self , doth by that which is called by some , Motus nexus , lay hold of the inward sides of a close Vessel containing and strictly imprisoning it ; and if they be otherwise severable , yet the strong contraction of the filaments of the Air holds them together , as appears abundantly by the Instance of the Magdeburg Hemispheres , mentioned at large in the 18th . Chapter of the Observations upon the Toricellian Experiment , and other Instances of the like Nature , given in that Book . 5. It is evident to Sense , that in that strong cohesion of the Filaments of the Air to the sides of the Vessel , when by the decay of Heat , it contracts it self with a motus or conatus of restitution , and with it the ambient Vessel by a motus nexus , yet if a small degree of Heat be moved to the Vessel , that contraction is relaxed , and the Vessels fall asunder ; and the like is done by the smallest admission of the free or solute Air , though through a Pin-hole ; for by the Heat the included Air is again dilated , left lax , as before it grew cold , and by the admission of foreign Air , the included Air is relieved gradually to that expansion as is natural to it , and as it had before its Rarefaction or Condensation . 6. It is evident to Sense , that upon the smallest Pin-hole made in the Vessel where the Air is , that thus contracts and endeavours its restitution , either upon Tension , or upon growing cold after Rarefaction , the Air thus tensed or contracting it self , will greedily suck in the foreign Air , yea , or Water , for its relief against that Tension that it is under . 7. In Condensation of Air , especially by compression , it is apparent , that the Air takes up , or may take up a far less room than is natural to it , as appears in Wind-guns or Aeolipiles . 8. It is also apparent to Sense , that the compressed Air in those Instances , endeavours with great strength and force its relaxation from this compression , in so much as if it can get liberty , it will cast out a Bullet with great force in Wind-guns , and in Aeolipiles well made , and well charged with Water , by a Syringe it will throw up the Water above twenty foot high . These Phaenomena are as evident to our Sense of Sight and Touch , as any thing we see or feel ; and though there is difference among the Learned in the solution or manner of explication of these Phaenomena , yet the effects themselves are plain and sensible , and do give a sensible demonstration that surely there is some alteration of the state of this Body of the Air , or of its Texture or Fabrick under these various Appearances , which are usually called Rarefaction and Condensation . But whether they are really such , or how made or ordered , will be the Subject of farther Enquiry . CHAP. VI. Concerning the various Solutions of Condensation and Rarefaction , and first , of that which is by supposed interspersed Vacuities . RArity and Density of Bodies , although it terminate in a greater or lesser dimension or extent , which properly respects Quantity , yet they seem in themselves to be but various Passions , Affections or Qualities of Bodies arising from their different Textures , either more crass or more subtil : And Rarefaction or Condensation of Bodies seems to be those several Motions towards these Qualities of Rarity or Density , caused for the most part by some external or adventitious Agent , which changeth and altereth the Texture of any Body whereby it assumes those Qualities of Rarity or Density different from its own natural constitution , and sutable to the variety of the Texture they do for the time undergo . There have been various Solutions or Explications of these apparent Phaenomena of Condensation and Rarefaction , which I shall in the next place consider ; holding my self to that of the Air , either by compression , in case of Condensation , or by expansion by Heat , or by Tension by force , in case of Rarefaction ; because this Instance of Rarefaction and Condensation of the Air , is most obvious to Sense , and doth in a great measure explain the Rarefaction or Condensation or other Bodies capable of those Affections . These Methods of Solutions of Explications of Rarefaction or Condensation that have been taken up by several parties , are principally three . 1. Of those that suppose the same to be performed by reason of interspersed Vacuities , Porosities , or Spaces , empty of all body interposed between aery particles , which in cases of Rarefaction , are made wider by a kind of divulsion or greater apertures of the particles of Air , or other bodies rarified , whereby the Interstitia of the aerie Particles are greater , and those empty interspersed Vacuities made larger ; and in case of Condensation , the aerie Particles are crouded closer together , and those empty spaces or Interstitia made less by reception of those particles of Air into those Vacuities , in a closer posture or conjunction than they were before such compression , constipation or condensation ; and this I call the Epicurean Solution . 2. Of those that admit no Vacuities at all in the Universe , but that all places or spaces are full of some body or other , but that in the Rarefaction of the Air , whether by Heat ( which I call simple Rarefection or Expansion ) or by a forcible distraction or divulsion of the particles of such rarefied or expanded body by force , which I call Tension , those particles of the extended or rarefied body , are removed to a greater distance one from another , and as they are so removed , other more subtil , corporeal particles do interpose gradually , and fill up those Interstitia ; and in case of Condensation , the more subtil parts with which all bodies are furnished , but especially the Air , are driven out by compression , and take up a temporary residence at least in the conterminous Air. And this I call the Cartesian Solution ; though this , as shall be shewn , have some variation in the manner of its explication . But though these methods differ in the application to the matter in hand , yet they both much agree in this , that the first material Principles of Bodies are certain minute Corpuscles or Atoms ; which , though they are really bodies , and therefore Mathematically divisible , yet they are so minute , that physically and actually they are indivisible ; and therefore in themselves hard and unfrangible into lesser portions . This I shall examine hereafter in the seventh and eighth Chapters . 3. The third Solution is that of the ancient Philosophers , and some other of the Modern , which suppose that Rarity and Density are really natural Affections or Qualities of Physical bodies , and that Rarefaction is a real expansion of the very entire Moles of the body truly rarefied ; and Condensation is a real contraction of the whole dimension of the body condensed , namely , where it is truly and formally a true Rarefaction or Condensation , as the Question is above stated in the beginning of the Fourth Chapter ? And this I call the Aristotelian Solution ; and seems to me the truest , in the manner hereafter dedescribed . First therefore , Touching the first of these Solutions , by interspersed Vacuities : This , though it doth in truth take away the true Notion of Rarefaction and Condensation , as it is before stated ; for still the same body holds but the same quantity of space , though in different position or ubication of its parts , yet I must needs say , were the supposition of interspersed Vacuities true , would in a great measure ( though not altogether ) salve many of the Phaenomena of Rarefaction and Condensation . But there are these two grand Objections , that I think render this Solution impossible to be true . 1. It seems to me utterly untrue , that there are any such interspersed Vacuities , wholly destitute of Body , either in the Air or any other Body , and herein the Cartesians and I agree . And that which renders this Supposition untrue , is that excellent demonstration improved by Sir K. Digby , in his History of Bodies . If there were such interspersed Vacuities , it must necessarily follow that those Bodies of an equal Superficies , that are more rare , must have more or greater interspersions of such Vacuities , than such as are more dense ; or which is all one , the same Moles of body that is more dense , must needs have more of matter or body in it than that which is more rare ; or which seems to be equally consequential , that where the body is more weighty , the same external Moles of the more weighty body must needs have more of body , and less of interspersed Vacuities than that which is more light , where the external Moles of either is equal . And therefore a Cubique Foot of Gold must have more of Body , and less of interspersed Vacuities than the like Cubique Foot of Silver , and that than the like Cubique Foot of Water ; and that than the like Cubique Foot of Air. The Lord Verulam , in his Historia Densi & Rari , pag. 8 & 9 , by an exact computation , gives us the Estimate of the disproportion of Weight of the same extrinsick Moles of several bodies ; whereby he finds that a portion of pure Gold reduced into a Cubical Figure or Moles , weighed 20 d weight , and the like Moles of of Mercury 19 d weight and 9 grains ; the like Moles of Silver weighed 10 d weight and 21 grains ; and the like Moles of Water weighed 1 d weight and 3 grains ; and upon a like trial , pag. 20. found , that the heavier any solid body is , and more united its parts are , the lighter was the same body reduced into Dust ( though closely compressed together ) in comparison to the weight of the same body before its pulverization . His Experiment goes not so far as the disproportion between the weight or denseness of Air or Water , but Mersennus and some others that have been curious in this Computation , tell us , that the same extrinsick Moles of Water is about 14 times lighter than the like Moles of Mercury , and the same Moles of Air is at least 900 times , others say , 1300 times lighter than the like Moles of Water . The consequence whereof is , that if we should suppose a Cubick inch or foot of Mercury to be entirely full without interspersed Vacuities or other Matter in it ( which yet upon the account given , wants much ) it must follow that in one Cubique inch or foot , or other Moles of Air , for one particle of body , there must be 11699 parts of empty space , each of these spaces equal to the space that the real body of the Air takes up ; such is the disproportion of the weight between the like quantity or Moles of Air to that of like Moles of Mercury , viz. as 1 to 11700. The consequence whereof would be , that yet the Cubique foot , or inch , or other measure or a Vessel containing nothing but Air , might receive a quantity of Mercury that bears proportion , as 11699 to 1 , and a quantity of Water as bears the proportion of 899 to 1 , without extruding any part of the included Air , or overfilling or breaking the Vessel wherein it is included . And if we should suppose that in the common Air we breath in , there should be but 891 parts of Vacuities , for one part of true substantial Air ( as there must be upon this supposition ) all respiration would presently be obstructed , and indeed all that Motion which we see , especially in Meteors . But as this is prodigiously incredible , so it is apparently untrue : For take a Tube full of Air , and stop it at one end , immerse the open end into Water , and press it down as low as may be , yet not one half of the Tube will be filled with Water ; nay take an Aeolipile of Brass with a Syringe to drive in the Water , it will with great difficulty receive into it ¾ parts of Water ; and thereby the Air contracted into a quarter of its former room , and with great pains and force it may be , into a much less room ; but never any pretended it could be compressed into the 899 th part of its former room ; and yet thus it may be , and with great ease , because here are 899 empty spaces which may receive the water with as much ease as if the Bottle or vessel were not empty only of Water or Air , but perfectly empty of any other body , abating only 1 / 900 of the room to receive the Air. 2. The Second difficulty in this Supposition seems to be this , that it doth not answer the Phaenomena , especially in condensation of Air by pressure , as in Wind-Guns and Aeolipiles , which visibly with a great force endeavours its restitution , as appears in the explosion of the Air in Wind-guns , and ejection of Water pressed into Aeolipiles ; for the Air upon this Supposition , hath a free room far more than sufficient for its reception , and therefore hath no need of any such violence in its motion of restitution , it having 899 empty cavities , whereas it hath need but of 1 / 900 part thereof for its reception , and more vacuity can contribute nothing either to resist compression , or to cause a sensible force of restitution , because nothing can have no activity or motion . 3. Again , if Air or Water be strongly rarefied by Heat , we see it takes up a larger extention than before it had , and that with such an energy and force , that it will break a strong Vessel inclosing it ; which it could never do , were there any considerable interspersions of Vacuities ; because the body of the Air would with much more ease break into those vacua Interstitia , which have no resistance against it , than it would or could force its room upon the ambient Vessel that containes it , and resists its dilatation with all the strength it hath . And this very reason doth as effectually conclude against the second Solution of Rarefaction by the admission of Materia Subtilis into the supposed Interstitia , if duly considered . CHAP. VII . Concerning the Second Solution of Rarefaction and Condensation , and its insufficiency . I Come in the next place to consider the Second Solution above offered , which supposeth these things . 1. That there is no empty space or interspersed vacuity in the Air or any part of the Universe ; with which I agree . 2. That the Principles of compounded bodies are certain minute Atomical Corpuscles , physically indivisible , and yet for all this , these very minute bodies are some grosser , like little Globuli , ground to as small a magnitude as is naturally possible , and yet the Ramenta or Filings of these Globuli are smaller than the former , and make that Constituent or Principle which they call Materia subtilis , which interposeth between other grosser Atoms or Corpuscles , and filleth up the Interstitia between them ; this Supposition I deny , and shall shew my Reasons against it . 3. That in Rarefaction or Tension of the Air , or other Bodies capable of Rarefaction , there is only a separation or disjunction of the parts thereof to a greater distance one from another , which doth not at all encrease its extension , but only varies the position or vicinity of its parts ; and hereupon to fill the Interstitia between the parts thus divulsed , there is immitted into those Interstitia subtil matter , or those subtil Filings of the Globuli that fill those spaces which are therefore borrowed from the subtil matter of the other parts of circumjacent Air ; or finally from the Aether , which seems to be the subtilest matter in Nature . 4. That in Condensation of the Air , &c. by compression that Subtilissima Materia that resided before within the body of that portion of Air , is by compression squeezed out , and driven into the conterminous Air , whereby that which we call the condensed portion of Air and its parts come closer together , and take up less room or space than it seemed to have before ; namely , in the external bulk or Superficies , though in truth and reality the Air it self thus seemingly condensed , and its particles , take up really as much room or space as before , though the figure , and position , and ubication of that space that it takes up now , is only altered by its secession into the spaces wherein the subtilissima materia now flown away , did formerly reside . This Solution of Rarefaction and Condensation , I think is neither true , nor doth it in any measure answer the Phaenomena in Rarefaction or Condensation . First therefore , I think the very Supposition it self of these solute Atoms is but imaginary and the creature of the Brain , and therefore I think may deserve the Title of Idolum Epicureum , or Cartesianum , never intended by the latter as any real Truth , but only as a Supposition , Engin or Medium to explicate the Phaenomena of Nature , though now unwarily enough taken up by many Virtuosi as a Truth . 1. It robs all bodies of any real or possible continuity without a miracle , or the substitution of some cementing matter , differing from Atoms or solute bodies , to hold the parts of the Universe together ; for how can really separate bodies , such as the very least of Atoms are supposed to be , have any continuity , or so much as mutual cohesion barely by contiguity ? For as to the Atomi hamatae , they savour too rankly of fiction and invention , and the Polar Magnetism and difference of Sexes of Atoms seems as vain . 2. We see in many bodies not only a continuity , but a strong texture , whereby they will not readily be broken , that yet at first arise from a thin watry substance or concrement , as the Nerves of Animals , the Wood of Trees , the Barks of Trees and Plants ; as Withy , Flax , Nettles , nay the very Spiders Web , hath besides its continuity , a certain tenaciousness ; so hath Water it self , as appears by the traction of the water in the longer Leg of a Siphon ; this tenaciousness , glutinousness , and strong cohesion of parts of bodies one to another , could never be by the apposition of solute particles one to another , though never so small , but from a kind of intrinsick contexture of the bodies themselves . 2. Upon this Supposition , it were necessary that all bodies should be equally hard , and equally weighty , and equally dense . Those Atoms , even those that are the most minute , that are the Constituents of the Materia subtilissima , are yet supposed to be bodies , and essentially divisible , though not divided , nor indeed divisible physically by any force , and therefore hard and unfrangible ; and therefore , if we should take a Vessel of a foot square filled with Air , this Moles , though we call it of Air , is yet really made up of those hard particles , and then how is it possible it should be soft to the touch any more than Brass or Steel ? For the softness of dust of Gold or other solid Bodies , is not from the dust it self , but from the numerous interspersed particles of Air. Again this Cubique Vessel full of Air is entirely full of body , or not ; if it be not , then this supposition must necessarily admit interspersed Vacuities ; the thing that the whole Supposition of the Cartesians deny : But if it be full of body in every imaginable space thereof , why should not this Cubique Moles of Air thus constipated with a plenitude of body , be as weighty as the like Cube of water , yea , or Gold ; for as to solidity , the Atomical bodies themselves in both , are of the same consistence , and all spaces are supposed full both in the Cubique foot of Air and Water , for excess of weight , is but the effect of excess of Matter or bodily substance . 4. Again , It is most certain that the smallest Atoms or Particles of matter , even the Ramenta that are supposed the Constituents of the Materia subtilissima , are yet bodies , and consequently have their Trina Dimensio , and variety of configurations ; some spherical , some cubical , some triangular ; be these never so little , yet it is impossible they can exactly touch one another in all parts of their Superficies ; a spherical body cannot be in all its Superficies contiguous to another spherical or cubical body ; and consequently there must be some real , though small Intervals between these minute Particles , and then the Cartesians , to make good their Supposition , must have yet another matter more subtil than that which they yet call subtilissima , to fill those Chinks : Et quis custodiet ipsos Custodes ? And it is not enough to say these fissures between the minutest Particles , are inconsiderable : For if they be at all , it spoiles the Supposition ; but besides that , certainly he that holds this Supposition , must yet admit that in the Cubique Foot of Air , the Interstitia must needs be greater than in Water or Mercury of the like Moles ; for certainly otherwise the weight of Mercury , Water and Air , would be all one ; and so they fall in with the Vacuists . Therefore upon the whole Matter , it seems more agreeable both to Nature , Sense and Reason , that in the first production of bodies homogeneal , whether by Creation by Almighty God , or by Generation , according to his instituted Law of Nature , the consistency of things , and their several textures , to be the immediate effect of their first production , and that they consist of parts in union , and not separated till actual separation , and that these parts are of the like consistence and texture with the whole in bodies homogeneal , as in Air and in Water , and not of parts or principles quite of another consistence and frame from the whole ; all the parts of the Air to be Air ; but yet some Air or Airs at some times more subtil than others ; and so for Water : And therefore all this Apparatus of Atoms , and Globuli , and minute particles , are not of things that ever really existed , but only the creatures and fictions of the Brain . But if we should admit of any one common material principle of physical bodies , it is most consonant both to the Doctrine of the Scriptures , and to some of the ancient Philosophers , that it should be Water . 1. Thus it is declared in that admirable Narrative of the Creation , the first distinct body we find mentioned , is the Water . 2. This was the opinion of the Learned Thales , Milesius , and others of the Ancients , Ex Aqua omnia . 3. The accommodation of Water to the production of other bodies by the transmutation of its texture , speaks much for it to be the common principle of material bodies . 1. It is productive of Consistences rarer and more subtil than it self , as Vapours , Fumes ; yea and of the very Air it self , by the means of activity of Heat . 2. It is productive of things more crass and solid than it self , as Leaves , Fruit , Wood , Shells , Stones , which we see arise from certain concretions singly of water . 3. It is productive of consistences that have greater tenaciousness and connexion than it self ; as we see in the production of the Nerves , Tunicles , Tendons , Muscles of Animals , which are at first but certain waterish concrements , digested by the Animal heat into those Ligaments , and in the tough and strong barks and filaments of Vegetables , in their trunks , rinds , &c. which are at first but a kind of limpid juice or water sucked up into the bodies of Vegetables ; and that even where it hath no other visible nutriment but simple Water . 4. In the dissolution of bodies , either artificially or naturally , they seem most readily to reassume a waterish Consistence : Water therefore seems more accommodate to be the common material principle , much rather than these imaginable Atoms , though I take not upon me positively to determine it . CHAP. VIII . Further Considerations concerning the deficiency of this second Solution in relation to Rarefaction and Condensation , and the Supplements that have been devised to enforce or supply it . IN the last Chapter I have considered the improbability of the Supposition in general . I shall now set down those Reasons and Evidences which render the whole Supposition utterly inapplicable to the Phaenomena of Rarefaction and Condensation . 1. As to Rarefaction , the intromission of these foreign particles of Matter , to supply the supposed separation of the particles of the Air , or other body rarefied , it is not possibly consistent with that motion which rarefied bodies have in the time of their rarefaction , which is most apparently expulsive of any foreign Matter , and not receptive of it . Take a Corn of Gunpowder , and give it fire , it turns in a moment to a body of flame above 1000 times larger than it self ; it drives away the conterminous Air from it ; and if it be a good quantity of Powder , it will break the Windows . Walls and Contignations next to it , and this done in a moment , and in the moment of its expansion : Is it imaginable to any man that thinks twice , that in that moment of its expansion , when it drives all before it and from it , this Subtilissima Materia , which is so subtil and delicate , should have admission , and admission in that moment , to make good an expansion of such an extent , nature and quality ? Again , When Air in a Vessel , is brought near the fire , and warmed by this Heat , the Air is expanded , and a great part of it driven out of the Vessel ; and if the Vessel be close , it will break , from the dilatation within ; so that in all this rarefaction , the Air , and all the particles of it , and within it , have a pressure outward , not any motion of receptiveness of any thing from without , and therefore must necessarily drive away those gentle particles of Materia subtilissima , and can never admit them in the act of rarefaction done by Heat . 2. It is a very hard supposal that the subtil Matter should pass through the most impervious bodies , as Glass , Brass , yea Gold it self , for the supplying of the Interstitia of tense or rarefied bodies , as it must according to this Supposition . But , 3. It is not only difficult to believe it , but the contrary thereof is most apparently evident to the very Sense , especially in the Magdeburg Hemispheres , described , cap. 18. Nugarum : If you take the two Brass Hemispheres there described , and by heat rarefie the Air in them , then clap them together in the manner there described , when the included heat is spent , they will cohere so strong together , that 30 l. weight will not sever them , but let them receive a moderate heat again from the fire , or let there be a hole no bigger than the point of a Needle to let in any foreign Air , they will be quickly severed ; for the tension which the included particles of Air do gain by their motion of restitution , and Motus nexus , is thereby relaxed : And it is observable , that these Hemispheres , if they are kept from heat or perforation , they will remain in this posture of cohesion an hour , nay possibly a day , or week , or more : Now if this subtil matter , which must be the means of Rarefaction , or extension , according to the Cartesian Supposition , pervades the Vessel so easily , how comes it to pass that it is kept in this straight prison without avolation through the Brass Hemispheres ? Or rather , why doth not a greater quantity thereof pervade the Brass Hemisphere all this while , and release the Air from its hard tension , by separating thereby the Hemispheres , and so restoring the Air in all parts to its just and natural texture and position ? And certainly if the Spirit of Nature or Hylarchical Principle had any thing to do in matters of this Nature , or were effective in it , here were a proper business and exercise for it ; But we see that without perforation or accession of Heat , nothing of such relaxation is effected , notwitstanding the great stress that the Air is under in the Hemispheres , and which yet would be inevitably relaxed , if a considerable portion of subtil Matter did penetrate through the Hemispheres , and mix it self with the included rarefied Air , as well as if a little Air were let into it through a Pin-hole . 4. In the Instance last given , and many other of like nature , that might be given , where the filaments of the Air in their relaxation from heat , have a motion of contraction in themselves per viam restitutionis , and a consequential attraction on the Vessel including them per modum nexus , it is impossible this can be salved by the Supposition of the Cartesians and Lucretians , which suppose the Air to consist of minute particles only joyned together by contiguity , for where there is only contiguity without continuity of parts , that body can never draw another body per modum tractionis , it will be really less tenacious than a Rope of Sand ; so that such an intromission of particles thus solute , as they state most bodies to be , by a bare contiguity of Atoms , could never explicate this visible Phaenomenon that ensues upon tension of the Air , or after the avolation or extinguishment of Heat that first expanded it . 5. And as this Supposition by no means salves the Phaenomena of Rarefaction of the Air , and what ensues thereupon , so it as little salves that of Condensation or Constipation of Air by compression , as we see in Wind-Guns , and other Engines , which upon a Discharge , or a Motion of that compression , do with a force explode or discharge themselves , and press very hard upon bodies that are in their way ; so that a Wind-Gun will drive a Bullet through a pretty thick piece of Wood , which could never be , if this Solution of Rarefaction and Condensation were true . 1. If the Air it self , and also this subsidiary Materia subtilissima were but a collection of minute bodies , joyned only in contiguity one to another , all the compression in the world would give it no more elasticity , or that explosive motion , than if a portion of Calice-Sand were forced into a Gun or other Vessel , with all the compression imaginable . 2. But again , in that elastical explosion by the Air compressed into a narrower room , what is it that actually exerciseth that explosive Elasticity ? Is it the subtil matter that was mingled with the included compressed Air ? Surely no ; for according to this Supposition , that is squeezed out and permeated through the Barrel or Trunk of the Wind-gun : Or is it the grosser Particles of the Air that is yet left in the Gun , and cannot get out till the Obturaculum be removed ? But there is no reason for that to have any Elasticity ; for by the avolation of the subtil Matter , there is room enough left for it ; and under that narrow dimension that now it hath , yet hath it as much room as before ; for the avolation of the Materia subtilis hath made a perfect room for it , and left it a space exactly commensurate to its corporeal Moles . But it may be that the Materia subtilis that was driven out by the compression , now upon the aperture of the Obturaculum , pervades the substance of the Gun with that force that it gives the explosion . But it is apparent that neither this can help it ; for it doth appear that the Motion of the Subtil Matter into the Orifice of the Wind-gun upon the removal of the Obturaculum must needs run counter to the explosion of the Air , and obstruct it . Again , it is apparent that the subtil Matter is driven out gradually and with iterated force , and it cannot pervade the Iron sides of the Gun , but gradually , and with great straining , and to imagine that in a moment , the moment of a Motion of the Obturaculum , the whole body of that removed Matter should pervade the strong and close Metal in an instant to give that strong and forcible explosion , exceeds all reason , sense and credibility . And therefore it was but necessary for those that will maintain this Assertion to substitute a Spirit of Nature , or an Hylarchical Principle , which for the preservation of Bodies in their due natural state and position , should act little less than miraculously to supply all these Difficulties , which yet notwithstanding must be supposed according to this Supposition to act in contradiction to it self and Nature also . For when in Rarefaction of Bodies this Spiritus Naturae sends supplies of subtil Matter to fill the Interstitia , it must necessarily rob other parts of the Air of some of that subtil Matter that properly belonged to its texture and natural constitution ; and so when one portion of Matter is gratified , another is impoverished of what belongs to it , which seems wholly unsutable to the office which this vicarious Spirit of Nature ( according to this new Supposition ) is substituted to exercise . CHAP. IX . Touching the Third Supposition of the Method of Rarefaction and Condensation according to the Ancient Philosophy , and seems to be the truest . HAving examined the two former Suppositions , and as near as I can , discovered their insufficiency , I now come to the Third , which I think to be true , viz. as to that kind of Rarefaction and Condensation ( which before in the 4 th Chapter is stated to be the true Matter of the Question ) for in Rarefaction of a Body ( suppose Air ) either by Heat or Tension , there is a real expansion or dilatation of the same Moles of Matter of the Air , and all its parts to a larger space , extent or dimension than it had before ; and in Condensation , by Cold , ( but more evidently by compression ) the same Moles of Matter , and all its parts have a narrower or less space or expansion than before . I suppose therefore that although Rarefaction and Condensation of any Body from its natural size and dimension belonging to it , is for the most part , if not alwayes , by the agency or efficiency of some external cause , yet under such circumstances : Rarity and Density are but natural affections , or rather Passions , Qualities or Modes of such Bodies arising from their very texture and make , and are as naturally belonging to them as Heat or Cold , Humidity or Driness , Smoothness or Roughness , or other tangible Qualities to other Bodies that are more gross and corporeal . 2. I do suppose that whatever men have talkt or wrote concerning Spatia imaginaria , without relation to any Bodies to fill it , yet as time or successive duration is a kind of Attendant upon successive Motion , so space is a kind of Entity relative to Bodies , and dependent upon them . 3. To make way to what I have to say herein : It seems to me no kind of repugnancy in Nature , but altogether consonant thereunto , and that it is equally possible and reasonable that a Body that is much more rare than another , and having in it less of solid corporeity , and consequently of weight , than another , yet may as entirely fill the whole space within the compass of its external Superficies , as a body of a denser consistence , so that although Gold be 18000 times bulk for bulk heavier than Air , and near 20 times heavier than Water ; and although Water be near 14 times lighter than Mercury , yet it is no way repugnant , but highly consonant to Nature , that all the particles of a Tube of Air may be as closely united one to another , and as entirely fill that Cubical space , as the like Cubical body of Water or Mercury , or Gold : And that although it is inherent in the very nature of a rare body , not to have so firm a consistency as that which is more crass and solid ; yet such a rare body may be wholly destitute of Pores or Interstitia between its parts , as the most solid body imaginable ; for porosity or distance of parts is not an effect necessarily resulting from Rarity . For it would be a strange position , that no Body that were not summè solidum or crassum , could have been created , that had all its parts commensurate to all the space within the external dimensions , or extima Superficies of such body , and yet this must necessarily follow , if such a commensuration ex natura rei , were contradictory to , and inconsistent with any body that is not summè solidum or crassum , whereof possibly there is no instance that is or can be made ; for Gold it self is not summè crassum or solidum ; for one piece of Gold may be solider , and have more of crass Matter than another : which appears by the Disparity of weight between two several kinds of Gold of the same bulk . Nay , upon a strict search it may be found de facto true , that some kinds of Wood or Metals that are more crass , and consequently more weighty than others , may yet be more porous than some Woods or Metals that are lighter and of a greater tenuity ; yea , Glass or Crystal , that is lighter and less crass than some other bodies , may be less porous than such as are heavier and crasser ; or if comparison be made between it and common Iron-Ore , the like between Calice-Sand and yellow Wax , and many more , whereof the Table of the Lord Verulam , in his Historia Densi & Rari , may yield us many Instances . Again , we have no better measure of the Rarity or Density in Bodies than their difference of weight , Quod Rarum , leve ; quod Densum , grave . Let us resume the Instance given supra , cap. 6. Wherein it appears that Air is at least 12000 times lighter ; and consequently rarer than Mercury : Now if we should suppose the Air in a Cubique Vessel of a Foot square , should fill but 1 / 12000 of that space , and the rest , viz. 11999 parts of that space must be either totally empty , or supplied with another kind of Heterogeneous subtil Matter , differing from Air : This must be the consequence of the Supposition that the Moles aeris is not commensurate to all the spaces within the Cavity of that Cube , and yet it is so evidently against Sense , that it is not possible to be admitted , or almost conceivable by any that duly thinks of it . Water is subtiler than Mercury , by 14 times ; Air is subtiler than Water by 900 times ; and possibly the Aether above the Atmosphere , or the Elementa Stellarum is as much subtiler than common Air of our lower Atmosphere . It were a wild conceit to think that every given portion of the Ethereal world must necessarily have forty thousand equal portions , either of Vacuity , or of subtil Matter , more refined than Aether , and that no one given portion of Ethereal Matter ; suppose a Cubique Foot could be exactly commensurate to all the space within that Cubique Foot , but must have forty thousand interspersed pores , either wholly vacant , or filled with another more subtil Matter than it self . I conclude therefore , it is equally consonant to the nature of Bodies , that a more rare or subtil Body may be , and is equally commensurate to all the spaces within the extent of its Ubication , as the crassest body in the World. The thing I drive at is this real Truth , viz. that a Body though never so rare , may be entirely commensurate to all the space within the compass of its external Superficies , as well as the densest or crassest Body that is or can be in Nature ; and consequently that the same Body , if it have at several times several textures , may in these several seasons entirely possess spaces answering such textures ; as , if Water gain the texture of Air , it may be commensurate to all spaces within its Superficies . 4. It seems to me , that although some particles of Air included in the common Body of the Air , may possibly be more subtil than others , yet as to point of extension or contraction , all the parts thereof , even the minutest parts thereof , as to the quality of Rarity and Tenuity , and the motion of Rarefaction and Condensation , are of the same nature , and perfectly homogeneal ; and the like for Water ; and although some imaginable parts thereof may be rarer , others crasser , yet they are perfectly mingled together , as common Constituents of the same Body we call Air ; and therefore to suppose the first Constituent minute particles of Air or Water , are hard , or of any other nature than the whole Body , is a precarious , inevident and unreasonable Supposition . 5. I do suppose it as a certain , evident truth , that the actual existence of parts or particles of continued Bodies ( as most evidently Water and Air are ) are but only potentially , or by the operations of the Understanding in such Bodies , and not really existing , as parts , or as divided , till a real and actual separation of them with integral parts , though they may be bigger or less , according to the method of their separation ; yet , 1. Still remain Bodies . 2. Cannot be indivisible , no not physically . 3. Are of the very same nature , texture or make with the whole Body out of which they are cancelled ; and therefore when the external Superficies of the whole bulk in Rarefaction is expanded , or in Condensation is contracted , the like expansion and contraction happens in proportion in every particle thereof , in a true and proper Rarefaction or Condensation , whereof the Question is stated . 6. I do not think that corporeity or bodily consistence is the same thing with quantity or trina dimensio ; but that this is but an affection or consequence of it ; for otherwise all Bodies that have an equal trina dimensio , must needs have the same Density , or an equal mass of Matter , or Corporeal Moles , which is contrary to Experience ; for a Cubique Foot of Water hath less of Matter than a Cubique Foot of Mercury , as appears by the disparity of their weight , the best indication of the disparity of the Moles of Matter . These things being thus premised , I now proceed to declare my thoughts touching Rarefaction and Condensation , holding my self singly to it as it is stated , to be the Question in the 4 th Chapter , and principally applying my self to those Bodies that are most Pneumatical or Spirital ( I say not Spiritual . ) It seems therefore to me , that as several Bodies of the same external extent or Superficies ; as , suppose a Cubical Foot of Air , Water , Mercury , or Gold , may have , and have yet a close continuity of all their particles without any Interstitia of vacuous spaces , or of other Matter , to fill them up , and all this arising from the various textures of those bodies , so the same body by a various texture acquired by accidental emergencies either of heat , tension or compression , may acquire a greater or less expansion , according to those varieties of acquired textures , yet without any new accession of substance , or deperdition of any its included particles , but still remaining individually the very same Matter . For if several bodies of various textures , may be some more rare , and some more dense , from their very Make and texture , and yet as well those that are more rare , as suppose Air or Water may as exactly fill all the spaces within the compass of their extension , without the subsidiary help of vacuities or other interspersed bodies , as well as those of a more condense consistency ; suppose Gold , Lead : or Mercury ; the very same reason doth enforce that the same body , if its texture be either by force or accident , altered to a greater Rarity or Density than it had before , may alter its space , and yet be entirely and exactly commensurate to a greater or lesser space , according to such alteration of its texture , as well as those several bodies that had primitively the like variety of texture constant to their nature . For Matter or material substance is of it self equally susceptive of a laxer or crasser , a rarer or denser consistence or texture of parts ; only when it is lax or rare , the same portion of Matter takes up more space , when it is crass or dense , it takes up less space . For instance , in Distillation we will suppose that first by some moderate Heat the distillatory Vessels , the Vessel ( wherein the Roses for the purpose are placed to be distilled ) the Head of the Still , and the Recipient to be as much evacuated of Air , or the included Air attenuated as much as may be , and then the Vessels closely luted one to another , the moist Matter of the Roses by gentle heat is resolved first into a subtil Fume or Vapour , and so rarefied from what it was in the Rose-Leaves : Then again these Fumes or Vapors partly by the coldness of the Head of the Still , partly by the collection and aggregation of the Vapors themselves , resolve into drops of water , and so discharge themselves into the Receivers : Here the very same body by the change of its texture , namely , the watry or moist substance of the Roses is first dilated into Fumes or Vapors , and then contracted into Water ; and the first receive a dilatation or expansion into Vapors , where it takes up a larger dimension in all its parts , as well as in its ambient Superficies , and then a contraction into a narrower compass , when resolved into Water , and yet continues still the same body ; but by variation of its textures , assumes a larger or narrower dimension in all its parts without reception of new foreign particles to dilate it , or emission of some of its substance in contraction or condensation . Which Instance explains what I intend ; namely , that the same individual body , according to the variety of its textures , may acquire a larger or less space , and yet continue the same body , though altered in the textures of Rarity or Density ; as Air hath a larger expansion than Water , so if Water be converted into Air , and thereby its texture altered into a more subtil expansive body , it takes up the same dimension as if it had been never Water , but alwayes Air. And if Air again be converted into Water , it takes up the same contracted dimension , as if it had ever been Water . And this method of solution of Condensation and Rarefaction , answers all the evident , apparent and sensible Phaenomena in Rarefaction and Condensation above delivered , and that without any difficulty or strained supposition : For instance , In Rarefaction by Heat , or by tension of a Cubical Foot of Air in a Vessel , it is visible that the Air , and every particle of it , gains a larger extent every way ; for it will break the Vessel , unless it have vent , which it could not do , unless the entire body were extended , and not barely the Superficies , because unless the whole Moles were every way expanded , it would have room enough within it self for its reception without breaking the Vessel that contains it . Again , when the Heat decays , and consequently the Air relaxed from that extent , it endeavours its own contraction to its just and natural size and texture which it lost for the time , by the foreign violence of expansion by Heat or Tension , and this by a natural motion of restitution to its natural texture ; and because it cannot gain its relaxation to its former texture by contraction , by reason of the vacuity that would thereupon follow , it doth as much as it may , and lays hold on the internal sides of the Vessels wherein it is imprisoned , and pulls them together ; but as soon as it gains a relaxation by the admission of foreign Air into it , the very same portion of expanded Air that under its expansion filled a Cube of a Foot square , will subside into a space of less than six inches square , which was its true natural space resulting from the texture it then had , by that admission of foreign Air. Again , in Condensation a portion of Air , suppose a Cubique Foot in its just and natural texture , entirely fills all the space within that Cubical Foot ( for its texture is suited to such a space ) but being compressed forcibly into a Wind-gun or Aeolipile , the texture is changed by this violence , and it takes up perchance not the twentieth part of that space : The difference of its extension ariseth from the alteration of its texture by this external compressive force used upon it ; and hereupon it gains an Elasticity , which is nothing else but a natural motion or conatus to be restored to its former just and natural texture , and consequently to that just extent , and Liberty , and position of space that belongs naturally to it , as a Stick , or Branch of a Tree , or Spring of Steel being bent beyond , or against its just position , hath its motion of restitution to its former position , with a force or resilition : For the Air in its natural constitution , hath a certain determinate texture belonging to it , and consequently a just and natural extension proportionate to that texture . And this it greedily endeavours to keep ; and when disturbed from it , to re-acquire , which is the motion of restitution which I often express by the natural and spontaneous contraction of a Lute-string , after an extention beyond its proper texture . And this is the genuine and true cause of that strong and violent explosion that happens in those Pneumatical Engins of various sorts . So that in these and all other Phaenomena of Rarefaction and Condensation , this plain , and common , and ancient Solution squares exactly with them , as might be instanced in infinite more Particulars , if it were needful . And with this agree the best Philosophers both Ancient and Modern . Aristotle , that great Priest of Nature , in 4 Physicor . cap. 9. wherein he answers the Objections brought by others to prove Vacuities from the Phaenomena in Rarefaction and Condensation , tells us that Rarity and Density properly so called , are not by accession of new Matter , or loss of any of the old , but from the potentiality of Matter it self , to undergo several textures , and consequently several extensions , Si factus est Aer ex Aqua , eadem materia facta est Aer , nulla re insuper alia assumpta sed quod erat potentia , id tandem facta est actu ; & simili modo si orta est Aqua ex Aere , eadem namque materia nunc in magnam ex parva , nunc in parvam ex magna vertitur molem , &c. Qua re ipsa Moles sensibilis non ideo extenditur aut constringitur quia materiae aliquid insuper adjicit aut objicit , sed quia ipsa Materies utrumque subire potest , quo sit ut idem sit rarum & densum , & utriusque Materia una , atqui densum est grave , rarum autem leve . Again , the Lord Verulam , a great inquisitor into Nature , and not very friendly to Aristotle in his Historia Densi & Rari , after several Instances of Pseudo-rarefactions , when he speaks of Rarefaction of Air by Heat , pag. 43. tells us , Aer per calorem dilatatur simpliciter , neque enim separatur quippiam , aut emittitur , ut in tangibilibus , sed simpliciter fit expansio . This Rarefaction is not therefore by the distraction of the particles of Air one from another to a greater distance , and interposing porosities or interstitia either of perfect empty spaces as the Vacuists would have it , or filled with adventitious subtil Matter , as the Cartesians would have it ; neither in Condensation are any parts of Air , or included in Air drawn out , and thereby the remaining particles rendred into a closer order and contiguity one to another : But in the former the extension of the whole portion of Air , and of every particle is thereof quaquaversum enlarged , and in Condensation the entire extension of the Air and every part thereof is quaquaversum contracted , and this variation is no other but a common affection , or rather position or quantity of Matter necessarily arising from the various textures that it successively acquires . And therefore the great Objections that are made against this Method of the Ancients in their accounts of Rarefaction and Condensation , fall to just nothing ; as for instance , 1. That in Rarefaction of the Air , it must be softer to the touch , and in Condensation harder : I would gladly hear of that man that ever knew de facto Air condensed but to its 100 th part yet if it were condensed 900 times , it would not be so dense as Water , or what disproportion to the touch he can find between Smoke and Air , and yet the former is far more dense ; for it is conspicuous to the view : so that he had need be a man of exquisite sense , to make any conclusion from his touch , touching the Rarity and Density of a Pneumatical Body . Again , if the Atomical Hypothesis were admitted , it is not conceptible but that all bodies , whether in their natural texture , or under the motions of Rarefaction and Condensation , must be hard and equally hard , because consisting of a plenitude of Atoms , which are all supposed to be hard and infrangible . CHAP. X. A farther Consideration of Rarefaction and Condensation , and of the Supposition of the penetrability or impenetrability of Bodies , Material Substances , Quantity , Extension , &c. THe principal Objection against the method of Rarefaction and Condensation , propounded in the former Chapter , is this , That it is impossible the same Moles of Matter can assume a larger space and dimension , as in Rarefaction , without a division of one part from another , and thereby leaving certain vacant Interstitia between the parts separated , or without a supposition of a pre-existent penetration of the parts of Matter , while in its former more condensed consistence , and in Rarefaction thrusting out those parts that formerly penetrated one another , being unfettered in Rarefaction , or by admission of new porosities made in the rarefied Matter , and reception therein of other foreign Matter . Again , Condensation of the same portion of Matter cannot be without supposition of vacant empty Spatiola , which are closed up by the strict coalition of parts , or by supposing a penetrability and penetration of the parts of the same portion of Matter in its new acquired state of Condensation , or by driving out from that portion of Matter some of its more subtil parts , whereby the remaining parts are fewer , and take up less room or space than before such Condensation : The first is the first way propounded by the Vacuists , and is rejected . The second is in effect the way propounded by me in the former Chapter , but is said to be inconsistent in nature , because penetrability of bodies or of extension of Material Substance , is rejected by almost all Philosophers ; therefore the last , which is the middle way , contended against in the 8 th Chapter , must be the true Method of Rarefaction and Condensation . I answer , It is true , I have laid aside , and that justly , the Opinion of the Vacuists , in the 7 th Chapter , and likewise the Opinion of acquest of new Matter , and expulsion of part of the old , in the 8 th Chapter , and have entertain'd the Opinion of the Ancient and some of the Modern Philosophers , in the 9 th Chapter . And it is true that this Opinion thus by me entertained , cannot well be supported without a supposition of the penetrability of material Substances , or somewhat analogal thereunto , viz. Contraction and Dilatation : And it is true , that although I think that this penetrability of Material Substance , be a great truth , yet it is some difficulty to explain it ; which nevertheless I shall endeavour to do ; and in doing of it , the Answer to the Objection will evidence it self . And I shall choose to do it this way , namely , by explication of Terms and Words , and rendring my apprehensions sutable to those Explications , though it may be in a different manner from the usual or Scholastick expressions . 1. Concerning Penetrability and Impenetrability . 2. Concerning Material Substance . 3. Concerning Body , and wherein it differs from the Notion of Substance . 4. Concerning Quantity . 5. Concerning Rarity and Density . 6. Concerning Extension or Dimension . 7. Concerning Penetrability , how it is or is not applicable to the former Subjects . First , Penetrability or Penetration of Matter or Bodies , &c. is of three sorts , viz. 1. The permeation or penetration of one Body into or through another , by porosities of the penetrated Body , either found or made by the penetrating Body ; this is common almost to all Bodies , and is not the Penetrability in question . 2. The separation , distraction or division of the parts of a penetrated Body by the force and energy of another Body ; as the Arrow through the Air , or the Bullet through the sides of a Ship ; this is also usual , and is not the penetration or penetrability in question . 3. When one part or particle of Matter is taken into another portion of Matter by a kind of contraction , and swallowed up and drowned as it were , in another portion of Matter , by a stricter union than it had before ; whereby the same numerical portion of Matter hath a less extension and space than it had before , and yet continues the same portion of Matter without diminution or encrease of substance , and this is that which is the Subject of the Question in hand . And this penetration of Matter or Bodies may be considered two ways . 1. When two distinct divided bodies or portions of Matter are said thus to penetrate each other . 2. When the united parts of the same portion of Matter do penetrate and swallow each other , as is supposed to be done in Condensation ; and though the former be considerable , yet this latter is that kind of penetration touching which the Question grows . Secondly , Matter or Material Substance is the Substratum of Bodies ; and although it is not possible for it to exist one moment without a determinate extent and determination into some Body compleated in Esse Corporeo , yet it is of it self indifferent to any particular extension or bodily Concrement . This is that Materia Prima , the Subject of all Generation and Corruption , yet it self ingenerable and incorruptible ; that Proteus which in various successions is capable of various Forms , Extensions and Variety of Bodies ; as we see in a piece of Wood thrown into the Fire , that same material substance which but now was Wood , assumes several Natures and Extensions , some more fixed than the Wood , as its Salts ; some more lax , as Ashes and Smoke , and accordingly undergoes Varieties of Extensions different from what the very same portion of Matter had before : the very same individual supposed portion of Matter is capable of being determined into Air , Water , or some other Body ; and if determined into Water , it may be the supposed portion of Matter would make up a Cubical Body of an inch square ; but if determined into Air , it would make a Cubical body of above 1000 times that extension , and yet the individual portion of Matter simply the same , and neither more nor less under those different textures and extensions ; for Material Substance is naturally susceptive successively of various textures and consistences , from whence do necessarily result successively various extents or diminutions of that one individual particle of Matter under those various consistences . Thirdly , Body is nothing else but Matter determined into a Body of this or that Nature , Figure , Texture , Plexus , Quality and Dimension ; these are superadditions to Matter , and being added to it , determine it into Body ; and when this Body by the power of the Agent , assumes another distinct consistence ; then is that Body , either essentially changed into another kind of Body , or else accidentally altered in figure , dimension , texture , or otherwise , and yet the Matter continues entirely the same , as in some Bodies ; the very same Cubique inch of Bees-Wax may be moulded into a Globe , a Cone , a Trigone , &c. and yet continues the same numerical and individual piece of Wax . Fourthly , Quantity ; and herein I shall take the Liberty to use this word according to my own sense , abstracted from others acceptation : I call therefore Quantity that Habitude whereby a Material Substance under any determination is denominated more or less , and is a kind of proper inseparable Accident ( if we will call it so ) of Material Substance , and intrinsick to it , and really differs from Extension or Dimension : For instance , a Cubique inch of Water is rarefied into 1000 Cubique inches of Air ; or a Cubique Foot of Air is by heat rarified into five cubique Feet of Air ; here is variety of Extension , and yet the same quantity of Matter in the cubique inch of Water , and in the cubique foot of Air , as is after Rarefaction in the 1000 cubique inches of Air , and 5 cubique feet of Air , Quantity being closely knit to Material Substance , but this or that particular extension variable , though the quantity ( i. e. ) the Moles , the muchness of Substance be the same . And herein , among other things , it differs from Extension , that Extension is measured by artificial measures of Inches , Palms , Feet , Cubits ; but Quantity , in my acceptation , is measured by weight , which gives the discrimination of Quantity or Muchness of Matter , where , it may be , the extent is equal ; as a cubique foot of water is equal in dimension to a cubique foot of Mercury ; but there is 14 times more weight , and consequently more Matter and Material quantity in the latter than in the former . Fifthly , Density and Rarity are various Qualities both of Bodies and Material Substance ; and they are equally susceptive of those qualities , as they are of Colour , Figure , variety of Texture , or the like , namely , in successive portions of Time or Duration : and hence it is infallibly true that the same Material Substance that is now actually rare , is potentially dense ; or that which now is actually dense , is potentially rare , without any admission of new Substance , or deperdition of any of the old . And as several portions of Material Substance are susceptive of , or actually under several degrees of Rarity or Density , as Gold , Iron , Wax , Water , Air ; so the same portion of Material Substance may in successive portions of times be susceptive of several degrees of Rarity or Density ; for , as I said , they are but several qualities , or if you will , modes of Matter . The Motion to Rarity or Density , is that which is usually called Rarefaction or Condensation ; and though Matter or Body be susceptive of it ( some more easily , some more difficultly ) yet it is most ordinarily the effect of an extrinsecal Agent , as Fire , Tension , Constipation , Compression . The Method whereby the alteration from Rarity to Density , or to a less degree of Density , and e converso , is effected , is the alteration of the texture of the Body so rarefied or condensed into a more dilate or contracted consistence . And this Alteration is sometimes so great , that it alters the very nature or Species of the Body , as when Air is condensed into Water , or Water into Air ; sometimes it only alters the texture , without altering the nature ; as when Air is compressed into a narrower compass in Wind-guns , or dilated by heat in Aeolipiles , it remains Air still , though under differing texture from what it had before . The effects of Rarefaction and Condensation are neither increase nor diminution of the Substance thus condensed or rarefied , nor of its quantity or muchness : If a cubique inch of Brass were condensed into Gold , indeed the Moles would be less in extent ; but there would be the very same individual portion of material substance in both ; and the very same weight that the cubique inch of Brass had , would the portion of Gold have upon such a condensation : For weight and not extent is the best measure of equality or disparity of material substance . But indeed as to Extension , the measures would differ ; the same Moles of Matter condensed might not take up half the extent it did before , and being rarefied , might take up ten times its extension or dimension . Sixthly , Dimension or Extension ; Though as Quantity imports much or little , it be inseparable from the notion of material Substance , yet actual Extension in this or that determinate measure or degree , is but purely accidental to Material Substance ; for it may have one extension one hour , and the next hour have another , as its texture is altered : For variety of extension is consequential , and necessarily consequential upon alteration of texture . There are certain distinctions to be observed touching Extension , viz. 1. An actual , and an habitual , aptitudinary and potential extension , although de facto every portion of matter is under some actual extension , yet , as I said , this or that actual extension is not intrinsecal or essential to Matter ; for as it is capable of a variation of its texture , so it is capable of a change , variation and alteration of its dimension . But that habitual , aptitudinary and potential extension whereby it must necessarily be at some time or moment under some determinate extension or other , is intrinsick to it , though it be successively alterable as its texture is alterable . Again , 2. We must distinguish between the extension in the superficial and external dimension , and that which is the whole portion of Matter ; the former may be without the true and real encrease of extent or dimension ; for possibly by the distraction and separation of the more interior parts of Matter , and the production thereby of porosities , the external superficial extent may be enlarged , and yet the whole extent continues the same , but only with a diversified ubication of the more interior parts of Matter ; but that extension which is intended by me in Rarefaction , is an entire extension of the whole Matter and all its parts , without which there is no true and adequate extension ; and that contraction or penetration of Material Substance to Condensation , is the contraction of the whole triple dimension , length , breadth and thickness of the whole Body and every part , yet retaining the same quantity or muchness of Substance . And as I have shewed that in several portions of Material Substance , it is not only consistent with the Laws of Nature , but evidently true in fact that a portion of rarefied Matter ( suppose it Air ) may be , and is co-extended to all the spaces within the compass of that Matter , and fills them as entirely as a most dense Body or portion of Matter fills all the spaces within its superficial dimension ( as suppose it Water , or even Mercury or Gold it self ) so the same portion of compacted Matter , suppose it Water or Mercury , being rarefied into a more dilated and expanded consistence , as into Air or Fumes , may upon the very same account fill all the spaces within the extent of that dilated extension , without any hiatus or interstitia of empty spaces , or the acquest of any additional Matter , because the texture of that portion of Matter is only changed , and a greater extension or dimension is necessarily consequential upon , or concomitant with the variation of the texture of that very same portion of Matter to a greater expansion in Rarefaction . Seventhly , The Contraction or Evolution and Expansion of a Spirit or Spiritual Substance , which is commonly called Penetration , is incident to Spirits and Spiritual Substances , that are void of Matter ; but this doth not at all impeach that natural penetration of Material Substance whereof I have spoken ; for they differ toto coelo one from another . 1. In the principle of each Penetration : In Material Substance it always , or at least , commonly , proceeds from an external efficient or force , as in Contraction or Penetration of Material Substances by compression , or by constipations from without ; but the penetration or contraction , or dilatation of a Spiritual Substance , is from an internal principle , possibly the determination of the will of such a Spirit to contraction or evolution . 2. In the Consequent , or rather Concomitant of such Penetration or Expansion : In Material Substance , upon contraction or penetration , the Matter is necessarily thereupon more dense ; and in evolution or expansion , more rare ; for it cannot be one or other without the acquest of a new texture of its parts , viz. more lax in Rarefaction , more close and compact in Condensation ; but in the contraction or evolution of a Spirit , there is no alteration in the texture , or Rarity or Density of a spiritual substance : For Rarity and Density are Qualities and Affections competible only to Bodies and Material Substances , not to Spirits or Substances purely immaterial ; therefore I do dismiss the Penetrability of Spirits , as a thing wholly unapplicable to the Matter in Question , and no way applicable to the Argument in hand . Eighthly , Now to apply the business of Penetrability or Impenetrability to what hath been formerly delivered . First , In case of several Bodies that are under several actual dimensions , and not united one to another by continuation , this concerns not the present Question , which is touching one common portion of Matter , whose parts are united one to another , and so in a state of union : yet whether that a Body may not be of so high a rectified purity and tenuity , that it may penetrate the dimensions of a grosser Body without porosities for its transition , either found or made in that penetrated Body , may be difficult to determine , because we are unacquainted with the highest degrees of subtilty of Bodies , and consequently of those Energies that are consequential thereupon : Only if Light be a Body , or if the Magnetical effusion be corporeal effluxes as some of the late Philosophers assert , it seems to favour such a penetrability of such subtil Bodies ; for Light will pervade every part of the Diaphanum , and Magnetical Effluxes will pervade the solidest Bodies , even Gold it self , as Experience shews us , without making porosities for its transition . But I dismiss this as not to the Question in hand ; and possibly the Supposition that Light or Magnetical Effluxes are Bodies , is untrue . Secondly , As to portions of Matter , Bodies and Extensions thereof , where its parts are united in one common continuity , as in the case of proper Rarefaction and Condensation , it seems that such a penetration of actual dimensions , or of Bodies determined in or under actual dimensions , such a penetration either of Bodies or actual dimensions , or extensions , is impossible and contradictory in it self , so long as such actual dimensions continue unaltered by an alteration of the texture of such Body , and consequentially of such actual dimensions ; for a cubique Body of 12 inches cannot be more or less in extension than it is , so long as it is a cubique Body of 12 inches : This is that penetration of Bodies and Dimensions that we do reject under that name . Thirdly , But in as much as the very same portion of Material Substance is successively capable of several textures , and consequently of several dimensions , there is nothing in Nature or Reason that prohibits a successive penetration of Material Substances under such a mutation of textures and actual dimensions , so that one and the very same numerical portion of Matter that this moment is under a texture accommodate to the nature of the most subtil Air , being condensed into a degree of Air less subtil , or condensed into Water , its parts will be constipated and contracted into a closer posture , and take up less space according to the degree of its Condensation ; which contraction or constipation of its parts , may not improperly be called penetration of material Substance , but is not properly a penetration of Bodies , or extension actually determined , and remaining unaltered in its texture . And this gives the difference between 1. Penetration of actual Dimensions ; and , 2. Penetration of Bodies . 3. Penetration of Material Substance . The two former are impossible without an alteration of the dimension or texture of the Body . The third is not only possible but necessary , and necessarily consequential upon the alteration of the texture of the Body into a more rare or dense consistency . And the evidence of the Truth hereof is , because the same numerical portion of Substance material in a state of Rarity , is as commensurate to all the particles of Space within the compass of its external Superficies , and hath as perfect and undivided continuation of its parts one to another ; as when it is condensed into a consistence that bears not the 100 th part or 1000 th part of the same superficial dimension ; for otherwise it were not possible to conceive , but that in the whole Body of Air and Aether , for one portion of Material Substance , there must be 1000 portions of empty spaces or nothings , which is against Nature . And this Sentiment , though not warily enough examined and considered by some Philosophical Heads , hath made them run on with one common cry against all penetration of Material Substances , under the name of penetration of Bodies and Extensions , as a great absurdity : But of latter times , some more considerate and inquisitive persons have searched more freely and impartially into this business ; and though they do reject that impossible and contradictory penetration of Bodies and actual Extensions or Dimension remaining unaltered in the sense before given ; yet do not only allow , as possible ; but also assert , as natural and necessary penetration of the parts of the same individual portion of Material Substance , consisting in a State of union , and under an alteration of textures , and consequently a change of extensions , as any man may see in the Learned Treatise of Bodies , of Sir K. Digby , pag. The large Dispute of Guarinus , Guarini Disputatione 4to Expensione , 2. De Rarefactione & Condensatione . And our Learned Countrey-man , Dr. Glisson , in his Tractate De Natura Substantiae Energetica , cap. 27 , 28. Wherein , among other clear Explications of this Matter of Penetrability of Material Substances , he hath these Passages , namely , the prejudice that men have taken up against penetrability of Matter , is , Quod ab incunte aetate consuevimus cogitare & dicere non dari penetrationem Corporum aut dimensionum quodque simul pro concesso habuimus penetrationem Corporum & Substantiarum idem sonare . Again , Impossibile est , ut manente eadem Extensione , mutetur Densitas , aut ut hac mutata , illa non mutetur ; mutata dimensione , ut in Condensatione , Materia partes aliquas sui quasi absorbet in seipsam . And again , Sola terminata extensio est quae materiam durante eadem terminatione , & non diutius impenetrabilem pr●stat . Neither is this any Novel Doctrine , but the very Natural Sense of Aristotle in 4 to Physicorum , cap. 9. before cited , and those expressions of the potentiality of the very same portion of Matter to become rare or dense , and thereby the Extension altered , without any diminution of its Matter in Condensation , or acquisition of new Matter , in Rarefaction ; though it mention not Penetrability in express words , yet asserts the thing , as it is above declared . Upon the whole Matter therefore it seems , 1. There is no necessity of a Supposition of a penetration of Dimensions on Condensation ; neither is it indeed possible where the Dimensions continue the same , but would be a kind of contradiction . And , 2. Consequently where the Dimensions continue the same without alteration , it is impossible there should be a penetration of Bodies or Material Substances , remaining under the same actual dimension unaltered . 3. But there is not only a possibility of the change of Extension , but the same will necessarily follow upon the change of the texture of the Body or Matter under such Extension : And , 4. Consequently the Extension there remaines not the same , but is changed . And , 5. Under such a change of Dimension or Extension , or together with it , there may be , and will follow that which is called a penetration of Matter or Material Substance ; for that which was the impediment thereof , namely , the actual Extension or Dimension is not only changeable , but now changed . And , 6. Therefore it seems no absurdity in Nature or Reason , to suppose such a penetration of Material Substances , in the case of Condensation , and is the most reasonable Solution of it . And thus I have given an Accompt of what seems probable to me touching this dark and intricate Enquiry touching Rarefaction and Condensation ; and therefore I have been the longer in it , because I would be understood , and because in the ensuing Remarks it is often urged against the Solution offered of the Phaenomena of the Torricellian Experiment ; and I shall remit the Answer of the Remarks of that kind to this Preliminary Discourse ; which , though possibly it may not satisfie every Reader , yet it will at least render it evident , that the Objections made upon these obscure and intricate Suppositions of impenetrability of Material Substance , are not so effectual , nor indeed proper to evince or prove , unless we had a clearer Discovery of the Nature and Affections of Bodies , than we have yet attained . And therefore Objections made from this Topique , lose their use , in as much as the Medium is more obscure than the very thing contended about . And now I shall proceed to the Remarks themselves . REMARKS upon the Essay touching GRAVITATION of FLUIDS . REMARK I. Upon the Second CHAPTER . THis Remark fiercely , and in the first greeting , chargeth the Second Chapter of the Essay with contradiction , in that in some places thereof , it is said , That Gravity is a quality whereby heavy Bodies tend to the Center ; and yet in other places it is said , That Gravitation is but Nisus or Conatus ad Motum ; and therefore that it is not improper to say , that Bodies that have a Nisus or Conatus ad Motum verticalem , do gravitate upward ; which the Remarker thinks to have been more properly expressed by Levitation ; and to call it Gravitation , is repugnant and contradictory to what is said of the quality of Gravity . But to avoid a frivolous contention of Words , it might have been fairly and easily observed , that in truth all kind of Gravitation is but Motion or Conatus ad Motum . But in that Conatus or Nisus ad Motum , we are necessarily to consider two things . 1. The Principium Motivum . 2. The Terminus Motus , or Conatus ad Motum . The Principium Motivum may be various , and tending to various terminations , it may be extrinsecal and accidental ; as when I throw a Stone into a Bucket of Water , the motion of the Water is thereby caused upward , and raiseth its Superficies , and the motion of the Water upward , is not altogether improperly called Gravitation upward , coming from an external force . Again , The Principle of the Motion , or Conatus ad Motum , may be intrinsick , and from that intrinsick Principle , may have a motion or Conatus ad Motum downward , which I call the intrinsick quality of Gravity ; this intrinsick quality governs and enclines the Motion and Conatus ad Motum , to a central termination , when it hath no collateral impediment . Any man with half an eye may see here is a Conatus ad Motum of the heavy Body to a central motion , which is its Gravitation , and yet the Principle that impresseth this kind of termination of its Motion , is that which I call , and call truly , the Quality of Gravity in the heavy Body . In the very Instance of the Motion of Water in relation to the Rundle of Wood , specifically lighter than Water , we may observe both these Gravitations or Motions the Water presseth downward from its intrinsecal Principle or Quality of Gravity , and thereby undermines and gets below the Rundle ; and then by a relative , occasional or accidental motion , in relation to the Rundle of Wood , it presseth upward , and drives up the Rundle of Wood with a force and kind of gravitation or motion upward to the Superficies of the Water : The same Water hath these various terminations , one downward , from its own intrinsick quality of Gravity , though the exercise thereof be suspended till it find a lighter Body within its dimension to exert it ; the other , upward , in relation to the Rundle of Wood , which by circumpulsion it drives upward . And therefore the kind consequences that I hold , there is nothing but mobility in Bodies , and that I use the phrase of Gravity according to the vulgar acceptation , and as Idolum fori , or that the actual descent of Water or other heavy Body , is from a distinct Being , as is inferred in the first , second and sixth Sections of that Chapter , are but mistaken Collections , and have no concession from me or any thing I have therein asserted , nor are at all true , as I think . As to the 4 th and 5 th Illation in that Remark , where it is said , The Water hath no Nisus ad motum upward into the Tube immersed , and stopped at the lower end , till opened , that , in the Sequel of this Enquiry will appear not to be altogether true : But if it were never so true , yet it impugnes not what is above by me delivered ; for the Water is driven up into the Tube by the weight of the body of the Water in the Bucket , upon the Cavity of the Tube filled only with Air , and so the rising of the Water into the Tube , is by the pressure of an accidental Position , and the fluidity of the ascending Water , meeting with an Element in the Tube lighter than the Water . We see in a pair of Scales a weight of two pound in one Scale , makes the weight of one pound in the other Scale , to ascend , though both are heavy Bodies ; and this by Mechanique and Statique Principles : So in the Siphon , A B , Water poured into the Leg A , raiseth the water in the other Leg , to an equal Superficies , upon necessary statique grounds , without calling in any subsidiary Spirit of Nature to effect the ascent ; for rhe Siphon is a kind of natural Libra : And so when the Tube stopped with the Finger beneath , is immersed into a Bucket of Water , and then opened , the circumjacent water being both fluid and heavy , is driven up into the vacant Tube , till it come to an equal Superficies with the rest of the water in the Bucket , by a kind of due Equipondium . And all this is most regularly and necessarily effected according to the common Mechanism of Statique Principles , without any help from the supposed Spirit of Nature , to fetch out the Air out of the Tube , or to raise the Water into it . There be many accidental causes of the motion of water vertically upward , which yet consist with its intrinsecal principle or quality , which I call Gravity , or Conatus to a central motion ; For instance , 1. It is moved upward by casting into it a heavier Body , which takes up some of its room ; as throwing a Stone into a Bucket of water . 2. It is moved upward by attraction ; as in Pumps and Syringes . 3. It is moved upward , when within its own dimension it meets with a lighter body than it self ; as in the instance of the Tube of Air immersed , and then unstopped at the bottom ; or where a Rundle of lighter Wood is immersed in it , it is apparent the water raiseth it , and casteth it to the Superficies with a kind of Force ; so that it will leap above the Superficies of the water , when it comes thither . But these accidental vertical Motions do not at all take away the intrinsick principle of its Gravity , but consist with it ; and therefore it is no contradiction to say that Gravitation is but Conatus ad Motum , be the motion lateral or vertical , or central ; and yet at the same time to say , that Gravity is a quality in heavy bodies , that specificates and determines their Conatus ad Motum to be central or perpendicular . REMARK II. Descent of Bodies . THis Remark would surely have have been spared , if the Author had been pleased to have read the next Page ; where it is affirmed , that Water powred through the Air , hath a direct central Direction and Gravitation , Pag. 14. of the Essay . REMARK III. Touching the Gravitation of Parts of Solid Bodies one upon another . THat every part of a Solid Body hath its common quality of heaviness , and would in a state of Separation , descend , and that every part contributes to the weight of the whole , is no where questioned ; only when the Body is in continuity , and of an equal consistence , that there is a suspension of actual Gravitation of one part upon another , is that which is affirmed : But where they are of different Consistencies , there many times happens actual and sensible Gravitation of one part of a Solid Body upon another . This is observed in the Third Chapter of the Nugae , pag. 1. And had it been observed , the Remark I suppose would have been spared . REMARK IV , V , VI , VII . Upon the Fourth CHAPTER . FOr the rendring my Thoughts more intelligible , touching Gravitation of FLUIDS , and to make my Approaches to it the more easie and fair , I give in that Chapter Instances of solute solid Bodies , and how the pressure of their parts are refracted , I begin with meer gross Bodies , square Stones of a foot square ; then descend to Wheat , Shot and Sand ; and in these latter , I make my application to their own incumbency upon an Egg-shell , because not so easily explicable by a perforation of their Base in respect of the exility of their Corpuscles . But yet I must tell the Reader , that allowing the proportion of their perforated Hole in the Base , to be but answerable to the exility of their Bodies , the coalition of more grains of Wheat , Shot or Granules of Sand at the same Orifice so proportioned , would stop their subsiding ; as appears to any that thinks it not below him , to observe in Hour-glasses , where the passage , though big enough for one Granule of Sand , will not admit the passage of two or three crowded together ; and Wheat will quarre in the Binn of a Mill if not shaken by the Clack . But as to the thing designed by these Instances , it is only to shew how by various , especially lateral pressures , the pressure of a Column of Stone , Wheat , Shot or Sand upon a subjected Body , is much broken . And certainly in solid Bodies , ita se habent minora ad minora , ut majora ad majora . If we had a good Magnifying-Glass , we should find the piling of the Granules of Sand upon Sand , though not so regular as is done by Masonry ; yet holding a fair and well-near equal analogy to it ; one Granule of Sand would appear to support two or three , and those again others ; and the declivity of the motion of the Sands would be conspicuous , and their bearing against the sides of the Vessel , and their declination from the middle of the Vessel . But the great Objection that is all along made , is , that the Corpuscles of Water are not to be resembled to those of Sand , but are much more minute and glib , and therefore the Instances hold no proportion to that of water . If I should admit the Remarkers Assertion , that Water is no continued Body , but consists of minute separate Corpuscles , yet it would not much advantage the Objection , for these Corpuscles are not Indivisibles , but Bodies consisting of trine dimension , and possibly there is not that disproportion between such an Atome of Water and a Granule of Sand , as between a Granule of Sand and a white Pease , much less a Cube of 12 inches square . And certainly in Bodies , ita se habent minora corpora ad minus spatium , ut majora ad majus : But I must not admit of this Supposition , that Water is no continued Body ; for certainly Water conjunct , though it be a fluid Body , is as really a continued Body , as Steel or Gold. But to render the Instances of Sand , &c. as reasonably explicative of this Phaenomenon in Water , I shall subjoin and explicate this rude Diagram . Suppose C D a Vessel of Water , with its various Lines of Declivity , and perpendicular direction , if you please , A , the Egg-shell , F , my imaginary Cone or Cap , impending upon it , B A , and A D , a Circle of water in the Base of the Vessel encircling the Egg-shell . I say it is impossible the Column of water incumbent on the shell , could press upon it , unless it could press upon and remove the circular Base of Water , encircling the shell , and unless that sink or remove by the incumbent water , the Egg-shell can be pressed no more in the instance of water , than that of Sand or Pease mentioned , pag. 7. of the Additions to the Pamphlet . But since the encircling water B A D , is of the same texture , weight and consistence with the rest of the water , it must remain unmoved as a Rock , and bear the pressure both of the perpendicular and declining water , which must necessarily protect the shell from the entire pressure of a Column of water commensurate in Base to the Egg-shell , which cannot be without pressing upon and displacing the circumjacent water , which is not possible ; for now the water incumbent upon the shell , and the circumjacent water , make , as it were , one common Basis to the superior water . The analogy therefore between the instance of the sand and water , and the accommodateness of the former to the explication of the latter , in this Phaenomenon of the non-gravitation of Fluids upon included heavy bodies , consists in these two Parallels . 1. Of the upper parts of the sand or water , in relation to the lower parts , viz. premendo the lateral and inclining motion and pressure of both , breaking and allaying their perpendicular or central pressure . 2. Of the lower parts of the sand and water in relation to the upper , viz. sustinendo the Base of water or sand , circumjacent to the Egg-shell , contributing to the sustentation of the whole superior mass of sand or water , and every particle incumbent upon that Base , sustaining a numerous company of other Particles , and those again others , so that the whole commensurate Column of the superior sand or water ( abating that small proportion , which , for want of a better expression , I call a Cap or Cone ) incumbent upon the shell , cannot gravitate upon it . And thus I use my Masonry of cubique Stones to explicate the manner of the gravitation of Sand , and the Arch of Sands , to explicate how the perpendicular pressure of water upon a subjected body in a Column commensurate thereunto , is remedied ; only in Sand the Monads and their mutual sustentation is more conspicuous to the Eye , than in Water ; but in Water the advantage is in some respect more effective of this alleviation by the continuity of its Matter . Upon REMARK VIII , IX . IT is thereby imagined , that the lateral pressure being checked by the sides of the Tube should spend their direction perpendicularly downward , and so more endanger the shell , which , as it is evidently contrary to the Sense and Experience of the fact , so it is contrary to Reason ; for the tendency of the lateral motion is still the same as at first , and the bare obstacle of its expansion cannot in a body of this nature , give it a motion of resilition to a perpendicular gravitation ; and if it could , it is impeded by the intervening Sand. As to the 9 th Remark , it is answered in the Observations upon the 4 th and 5 th Remark : But by the way , the jumbling of water hinders not its continuity , so long as the parts thereof are in conjunction one with another . REMARK X , XI . IT is agreed between us , that Gravitation is Nisus ad Motum ; but it never was , nor ever can be agreed by me or any person , that thinks before he writes or speaks , that such a Gravitation may not be excited and directed by a quality inherent in the Subject , which may terminate that motion , and incline and direct its motion to the Center . Gravity therefore is not of the same extent with mobility , but it is a mobility determined in its termination by the principle that puts it in motion , which , in the instance in hand , is the quality of Gravity , which is a determinate specifical principle , determining the mobility of heavy bodies naturally to a central direction , though it may be some time accidentally impeded , and ordinarily impeded by the fluidity of a fluid body . REMARK XII , XVI , XVIII . THat the parts of Water , when in conjunction one with another , are only contiguous , I do admit by way of Argument ; but I no where admit it by way of Concession : for if I should , I think I should grant that which is by no means true . I only therefore in that place argue , that were the parts of water solute , and only contiguous , yet even there the actual gravitation of them would be suspended as well as in Sand. And because the business of continuity and contiguity often occurs in the Remark , and great endeavours are therein used to prove the particles of Water and Air only contiguous , I shall here once for all , make some Observations touching Continuity and Contiguity , that I may avoid Repetition . We learn both from the Ancient and Modern Philosophy , that Contigua sunt , quorum ultima sunt simul in situ , & non est possibile quod inter ea cadat aliquid quod habet situm . Continuum autem illud , cujus natura est quod inter partes ejus reperitur unus terminus communis , or , quorum ultima sunt unum in actu : which is a little clearer explained by the Moderns , that Continua sunt , quando ex pluribus quantis fiat unum totum nulla sensibili commissura inter partes remanente ; or , implicatio & incorporatio partium unitarum ; so that they , as it were , run one into another without any sensible discrimination of their Moles or Situs . Although in grosser Bodies there is more required than contiguity , to make them continuous , yet in Liquids , especially perfectly homogeneal , as Water and Water , Air and Air , Mercury and Mercury , there ariseth a continuity of parts meerly upon their contiguity or contingency ; for thereupon they presently incorporate , implicate and mingle so one with another , that there remaines no possible distinction of the parts united , one drop of water touching another , one portion of Air touching another , one little globule of Mercury touching another , become perfectly continued bodies without more ado , though they were before divided by their distance , and interposition of another Body ; this is apparent to our very Sense , that these are undistinguishably united , incorporated and implicated one in another by their very contact , as closely , though not so firmly as Lead , Iron , or Gold , after Hammering or Fusion . In all Bodies that are in continuity , as there is a unity of Existence , so ( ordinarily , though not alwayes ) follows a unity of motion . It doth not alwayes follow , because there may intervene something that may disorder or break it . But in things barely contiguous , as they are not in themselves united so regularly ; ad motum unius non sequitur motus alterius , unless united by alligation , as in Chains of several Links ; by some other accidental intervention , as in the cohesion of distinct contiguous bodies , for the avoiding of Vacuity , as in polished Marble , &c. And herein we may easily observe the continuity of Water . Take a Siphon , and fill it with water , stopping both Legs with your finger , till the shorter Leg be immersed into a Vessel of water , the water will be entirely drawn out of the Vessel by a Funiculus of continued water , ascending and descending from the first immersion , as is shewed in the Additions to the Nugae . But fill the Siphon with the finest Powder or Sand , that traction will never follow upon its immersion into a Vessel of the same or the like Sand or Powder ; for in the former there is a traction by the continued Body of Water : But in the latter , the particles are solute , and only contiguous , and will not cohere , but gives us the Proverb of a Rope of Sand. And what is here observed touching the continuity of Water , and the traction wrought in the virtue of that continuity , is observable touching the Air , and the traction wrought by its filaments , as appears most evidently in the Magdeburg Hemispheres , in the 18th . Chapter of the Difficiles Nugae , and in the raising and holding up of water in the heated Tube or Glass , described in the 16th . Chapter , which could never be effected , did the Air consist only of contiguous and solute particles , unless we should dream they were fastened together by Hooks or Chains . And upon what hath been said , it is most apparent , that neither the softness of the Air , nor its easie divisibility or separability by a Feather or a Cobweb , nor the attenuation of the particles of water into vapors , by the heat of the Sun , are so much as tolerable Reasons against their continuity ; for although the disjunction and separation of the parts interrupt the continuity between the parts , when actually separated , yet the separability or easiness of separability of the parts of it , are not so much as a shadow of Argument against their continuity , till such an actual separation be made . No man that thinks twice , can imagine that Lead in fusion , is less a continued Body , than when it was solid ; or that Gold beaten into Leaf , is less continued than when in the Ingot , and yet the separability of its parts much more facile than before . And therefore the Fancy of contiguity only of fluid Bodies , is the effect of that Idolum Democraticum or Cartesianum , which with his imaginary Globuli , and their Ramenta , the Materia Subtilis , hath disordered mens Sentiments , as in many other things , so in this , touching Continuity and Ratio Continui . REMARK XIII . I Am very well contented to be rectified touching the Nature of the Principium Hylarchicum of the Learned Remarker . I must confess , when I found so much of a Spiritual Nature attributed to it , and that great and ready accommodation of it to the solving of most of the admirable Phaenomena in Nature , whether Mechanical or Vital , I thought it had been some intelligent Spirit or Intelligence ; but now I understand that it is only plastick and vital , not intelligent , and doubtful whether sentient or not : But of whatever nature it be supposed to be , it seems necessary to prove its very existence by such instances as are not meerly Mechanical ; otherwise I fear more is asserted than proved . REMARK XIV , XIX , XX. IN these Remarks lies most of the Elixir of the precedent Remarks . And besides , they offer at somewhat of experimental proof of what they assert , besides bare Notions ; but how far these proofs are sufficient or effectual , we shall see hereafter : And therefore I shall insist somewhat larger upon them and the Observations that are to be made upon them . Archimedes , in his Third Proposition De Insidentibus Humido , tells us , that if solid Bodies , having a Bulk or Moles , be equally heavy to the Water wherein they are placed , being let down into the Water , are so immersed , that nothing of the Superficies of the Water is above them , yet they are not pressed downward . And in the Sixth Proposition , he tells , that a Solid Body , lighter than the Water , being forced down into the Water , is driven up with such a force , as the Water having an equal Moles to that immersed Body , is heavier than that Body . And this driving upward of the lighter Body , is by that circumpulsion of a heavier fluid Body upon another Body lighter than it self , which will ( if it can ) take up the place that the lighter Body hath invaded within its Dimensions , and the Limits of its Province . And the truth is , the reason of the motion of a Ballance or Libra Artificialis in the Air , wherein a heavier weight in one Scale , lifts up a lighter weight in the other Scale , is in effect the same with this natural libration between the heavier Body of the Water , and the lighter Body of the Wood ; only here it seems like a Ballance inverted , wherein the counterpoise of the Moles of Water being greater and more than the like Moles of a lighter solid Body , must needs overweigh it , and if it be possible , get below and under it , as in this Scheme . Suppose A , be a Cube of Wood of 6 inches square , immersed towards the bottom of the Cubical Vessel of Water C D , and lighter than the like Moles of water , this Cube takes up the room of 234 square inches , which ( were not the Cube there ) would be in a great measure taken up by the Water . The Cube of wood is environed with a quantity of water equal in Moles to this Cube of wood , but exceeding it considerably in weight , the weight of the water must necessarily preponderate the Cube of wood , and consequently must thrust it upward , that it may possess the place the Cube of wood hath invaded , and so in this Libra Naturalis the heavier Moles of water must necessarily drive up the lighter Moles of wood , as in the artificial Scale , the heavier Scale raiseth the lighter . And hence it is that without the aid of an Hylarchical Principle the Water bears and carries up the Rundle of light wood in the Instance so often magnified by the Remarker . For unless the Rundle were so closely fastned to the Base , either by some glutinous matter , or by its strict jointing and adhesion to the sides or Base of the Vessel , as would be too strong for the water , to displace it , it is hardly possible by any art whatsoever to make the Rundle so close to the Base of the Vessel , but the subtil particles of water will creep between the Rundle and the Base , and throw it up in spite of the imaginary Column of water , commensurate to the Rundle that is supposed to keep it down : and herein , as I before observed , the water hath accidentally , and upon this occasion a motion upward , which yet is but the Consequent of its motion downward below the Rundle . And upon the same account it is , if you take a hollow Cane , suppose one inch diameter , 12 inches long , let the Base thereof be filled with a quantity of Lead for about an inch , then let there be powred in 6 inches of water , and then there will remain 5 inches of Air in the upper part of the Cane , although the Lead be heavier than so much water , and the water in the Cane equal in specifical weight to so much water ; yet as long as the whole weight of the Cane thus compounded , doth not equal the weight of a like Moles of water , this Cane immersed into a Vessel of water 12 inches deep , will not subside or rest at the bottom of the Vessel , but will be driven up to that height in the water , that the parts of the Cane subsiding in the water , will countervail a Moles of water equal to the weight of the whole Cane , and there it will swim erect . Experience and the very Reason of the thing , makes the truth hereof apparent . Stevin ( that next to Archimedes , hath written best of Hydrostatiques ) in his 5 th Book , Prop. 2. supposeth nevertheless , that if this Rundle cover a hole in the bottom of the Vessel , it will not rise , but will be kept down by the impending Column of water commensurate to the Base of the Rundle . Albert Girard , the Commentator , denies this ; unless the Rundle be of equal or greater weight than the like quantity of water . But the truth lies between them both ; for the Rundle lighter than the water , will be undermined in the Rims and Edges , and so the water will get out , do what the Artist can , if the Rundle be lighter than the like Moles of water . But then when the water hath thus gotten a passage to pass through the Orifice into the free Air ( upon which it hath been shewn , the Moles of water commensurate to the passage it hath now , presseth with its full swing ) and if it meets with the Rundle in the way of its motion , so long as it stands in its way , it will gravitate upon it till the water hath wholly discharged it self through the Orifice . And therefore the reason is obvious why there is some impediment in the ascent of the Rundle , when it is thus placed upon an Orifice , without calling in any other principle than the natural pressure of the water upon that Orifice , now giving it an access to an Element that it can press upon , viz. the Air below the Orifice . Just as we see in our Kettles and Brewing Furnaces , when they have a small Leak , the Servant throws in a handful of Bran , which though perchance it would not so readily sink , much less sink to the Leak , yet the motion of the water to the Leak , will carry those light and small particles thither , which being crouded in by the weight of that Column of water that is commensurate to the Orifice of the Leak , stops it . And the like is done upon a Leak in a Ship , where a light Fardel thrown out into the Sea , will be carried down to the Leak , and crowded into it by the water , & sometimes stop the Leak . And therefore touching the gravitation of the Column of Water upon the Rundle of light wood , where there is a hole under it in the Base ( which I add as an exception , pag. 57. and is no more than what Stevin tells us in the 5 th Book of his Practical Hydrostatiques ) both He and I must be understood where any little water passeth under the Rundle to the Hole , and therefore to clear that Experiment , and the reason of it , I made exact trials concerning it , as followeth . Then oyling the Base and Rundle as before , and uniting them , I filled the Bucket with water , which by reason of the glutinous Oyl , did not pass , nor sever the Rundle from the Base . Then fixing the Rundle as before , to a Scale , I tried what weight was sufficient to sever the Rundle from the Base , being under the supposed pressure of that imaginary Colum of water of 5 inches deep , and I found that very near the same weight would sever it from the Base under water , as did sever it when it lay dry ; and though in several trials there was some little disparity , which might arise from the unequal strictness of the juncture , either by the quantity of Oil , or position of the Rundle , wherein I could not possibly be exactly uniform , yet the Rundle was separated under tnat Moles of water , sometimes with seven ounces weight , sometimes with eight ; but at most , with ten ounces . And yet in the Column of water commensurate to the Rundle , were 55 square inches ; which , according to the exactest computation of the weight of water , amounted to at least 24 ounces weight : And this sheweth that gravitation of the water upon the Rundle , is to be understood , when there is some passage to give the water motion . So that it seems to me , the Conclusion that the Remarker makes from this Instance , in favour of the Hylarchical Principle , or the supposed Gravitation of a Cylinder of water upon the Rundle where no water passeth , must be laid aside , as no way assisting his Hypothesis , in impugning mine . And therefore , whereas Stevinus in his Practical Hydrostatique , ubi supra , grants , that the Body of a man , or other Body , lying flat upon the bottom of a great Vessel of water , feels no considerable pressure of the incumbent water , yet if there be a hole in the bottom of the Vessel under that body , it shall find a considerable pressure of the incumbent water ; this is to be understood cum grano Salis , viz. if the Body do not so entirely and closely stop the Orifice in the bottom of the Vessel ; but that the water finds a passage between it and the Base , to discharge it self , the Body then indeed shall find a pressure from the superior water at least , according to the weight of such a Column of water as can thus discharge it self between the Body and bottom through the Orifice . But if it stop the Orifice so entirely and close , that no water can pass that way , there will ensue no Gravitation upon the Body , by reason of that Hole or Orifice thus stopped ; for it is as if it were not : the body becomes as it were part of the entire close Base of the Vessel . And thus much may serve to explicate the Phaenomenon of the orifice or hole in the Base of a vessel under the Rundle . But now as to the Instance given in the 20 th Remark , whereunto the Learned Remarker appeals as an irrefragable Instance to take away at once the Mechanical Accounts of Continuity and Architecture , I doubt the Author gives us this Experiment without exact trial ; for if he had tried it , I think he would never have urged it . The Experiment , as I take it , is this ; Take a Cylindraceous Bucket of 63 parts in the internal Diameter , and let another Cylindraceous Bucket be of 62 parts external diameter , with 4 sloping holes at the bottom , and put the less into the greater , and fill them up with Water to the Brims , then take away your hand , and the narrower Bucket will emerge , leaving no more in the water than what is equal to the weight of such a Moles of water as is equal to the whole Vessel in weight . I shall take this Instance in pieces , and then we shall see what is in it , And for the better clearing of it , I shall make my way to it by Instances , though not altogether like it , yet giving a great light to it , and it may be , to other matters of this kind ; and I shall first consider the comparison between Bodies specifically heavier than the fluids , and then in Bodies specifically lighter . If there be a Bucket or a Cylindraceous Vessel , suppose 9 inches deep , then take a Cylinder of 9 inches high , and narrower than the Bucket , but of a Material specifically heavier than the like Moles of water , as suppose it Tin or Ebony ; if the Vessel be filled with a Moles of water of twice or thrice , or ten times the extrinsick weight of that Cylinder , yet the Cylinder will still sink to the bottom , by its advantage of its intrinsick or specifical over-weight or heaviness more than water . Now I shall consider the proportion where the solid Body is specifically lighter than Water or other fluid Body in Which it is immersed . I took a Cylinder of wood 4 inches deep , and 4 inches diameter , which weighed 18 ounces . The like Bulk of Water equal in Bulk to that Cylinder of Wood , weighed 32 ounces . So that the Water had a specifical or intrinsick weight near double to the Wood. And consequently the Wood being immersed in a Vessel of Water , near one half thereof lay above the Superficies of the Water , as it must do according to the Rule of Hydrostatiques . I took 2 Cylindrous Vessels , one of 6 inches diameter , the other of 9 inches diameter ; I put the Cylinder of wood into the Vessel of 6 inches diameter , and as much water as countervailed the Wood-Cylinder in extrinsick weight , but not in Bulk , and the wood-Cylinder would not swim ; for though the intrinsick weight of the Water was near double to the weight of the Wood , yet the extrinsick weight of both was equal , viz , 18 ounces , and so there was an Equipondium between the Water and the Wood , and consequently that Water would not raise the Wood from the Base of the Vessel . But putting in so much Water more into that Vessel , as that the lateral or ambient Water would rise so high as to cover a little more than one half of the Cylinder of Wood ( namely , such a quantity thereof as was equal to a Moles of Water , equiponderating the weight of the whole Cylinder of Wood ) then the Cylinder of Wood would swim , though the Base of the Water between the Cylinder of Wood and the bottom of the Vessel had not half an inch in depth . And the reason is , because the entire water both lateral , and at the bottom , is one continued body , and entirely presseth the Cylinder of wood upward , in as much as the lateral or ambient water hath gained an height upon the Cylinder , somewhat more than the immersed parts of the Cylinder of wood proportionable to a Moles of water equal to the whole weight which that whole Cylinder of wood amounts unto ; for the Cylinder of wood weighed but 18 ounces , but the whole weight of the water might be 20 ounces or more . But again , put this Cylinder of wood into the Cylindrous Vessel or Bucket of 9 inches diameter close to the Base , and pour in four or five times the quantity of water into the Bucket more than what was in the former Cylindrous Vessel of six inches diameter ; as suppose it be five pounds of water , yet unless the Superficies of that water rise not to more than the height of half the Cylinder of wood , viz. something more than two inches high upon the sides , the Cylinder of wood will rest upon the Base , and will not swim : And the reason is , because the water presseth according to its altitude , and not according to its amplitude , and therefore though the whole water in the 9 inches bucket be five times more in weight than the Cylinder of wood is , if it rise not so high as to take something more than half of the height of the Cylinder of wood , namely , such a quantity thereof as is commensurate to a quantity of water equal in weight to the whole weight of the Cylinder of wood , the Cylinder of wood would not swim , but will stand upon its Base at the bottom of the Vessel . And this is the reason why a Ship or Vessel that draws for the purpose 4 fathom of water , will swim in a narrow Cut or Channel that hath 5 or 6 fathom of water , though the Channel be less than 20 fathom over in breadth ; and if the Channel were 20 Miles over , and of a less depth than the Ships draught of water , viz. 4 fathom , the Ship will be on ground , and will not swim , and yet the weight and quantity of whole water in the broader Channel , is many thousand times more than that in the narrow Channel . And the like Instance may be given in Floats of Timber in a deep and narrow Channel , and a broad and shallow Channel . For the pressure of water is more or less according to the height or depth of water , and not according to its amplitude or breadth , though the water with ampler Superficies be a thousand times more in weight and bulk than the deeper water . Now to the Buckets instanced in the Remarks ; If there be a Bucket of 20 inches diameter , and another of equal height but of 6 inches diameter , fill the lesser Bucket with water , and place it in the middle of the greater Bucket , and then fill the circumjacent sides of the greater Bucket with water , though the greater Bucket hold 5 times the water of the lesser Bucket , yet ( allowing , as I must , the wood of the lesser Bucket to be but of the same weight with the like Moles of Water ) the lesser Bucket will still remain contiguous to the bottom , and will not rise one inch , and the reason is , because the water without , and the water within the Bucket , though of a different Moles , yet have the same specifical weight , and ( as to this purpose ) as if it were so much unvesseled water ( I say , as to this purpose , for as to the other purposes , there will be a difference , as I shall shew hereafter . ) But if the lesser Bucket be totally empty , or only filled part with water , suppose half way , then the water in the greater Bucket , will drive up the lesser ; but not till only so much be immersed as countervails its defect of weight , according to the 4 th . 5 th and 6 th . Proposition of Archimedes , ubi supra . But now to come to the Experiment of the lesser Bucket or Cylindraceous Vessel perforated in the bottom , and then water poured into the greater or lesser ( for it comes all to one account ) will the lesser Bucket emerge , unless held down by the hand ? By no means in the world ; for the water will presently pass through the perforations from one Bucket to the other , till they come to one common superficial height , and still the lesser Bucket will rest upon the Base of the greater , because they have an equipondium ; supposing ( as we must ) that the wood of the lesser Bucket is of equal specifical weight to the like Moles of water . Indeed it is true , that if the holes be small , so that there must be a Mora before the water can be conveyed from one Vessel to another , then if the water be plentifully poured into the sides of the greater Bucket , the lesser will rise till it have received so much water as equals the Superficies of both , and then the lesser Bucket will subside contiguous to the Base ; for the water in both Buckets being of an equal height , was in aequipendio . So that as the Instance it self conduceth little to the ends propounded , were it true ; so I doubt it is mistaken , and upon trial will not be found true . I did expect to have met with an Objection which may seem prima facie to impugne what I have formerly delivered ; yet upon a strict examination it would not have any efficacy . Take a Cube or Cylinder of wood of equal intrinsick weight with so much water , suppose it a Cube of six inches diameter , and put it into a Cylinder or cubique Vessel of water of eight inches deep , and twelve inches diameter , this Cube or Cylinder would rest two inches above the Base of the Vessel , and would not gravitate either upon the two inches of water in the Base of the Vessel , nor upon any Body that were but two inches thick , and lay between the Cube and the Base of the Vessel of water , yet here can be no lateral pressure or per declive in the Cube , it self being solid , and having only a central gravitation ; so that it may seem the lateral pressure which is the Subject of the Eighth Chapter of the Essay , applied to the Water , is no ingredient into its Non-gravitation . I answer , that the Fact is true , but the illation thereupon is not consequential . In my Observation upon the 4 th , 5 th , and 7 th . Remark , I say the non-gravitation of Fluids is in relation to the pressure of the upper parts upon the lower , which is per declive premendo : and in relation of the lower parts to the upper sustinendo ; now although in this Instance the former hath no part , yet the latter hath . In this instance the Cube or Cylinder is sustained and born up by the subjacent water , which is as the pedestal upon which it is bottomed ; and therefore neither doth nor can press below the position it holds : But suppose the Body subjacent to it , were 6 inches deep , then it would be under the pressure of that Cylinder or Cube of wood , as much as the weight of 4 inches of the Cube amounts to in the water , and the body would be under a pressure commensurate at least to so much weight as the Cube , or so much thereof as is thereby driven out of the Superficies of the water , exceeds in its extrinsick weight the like Moles of water , with so much of the Cube as lies in the water . But on the other side , where there is nothing impending upon the subjacent body but the superior imaginary Column of water , the subjected body is not compressed at 9 , 6 or 3 inches immersion below the Superficies of the water , partly by reason of the Mechanism ( I do not say Masonry of the water , though that expression is frequently , but needlesly used by the Remarker ) and partly by reason of the various termination of the motions of fluid Bodies . It shall not be altogether impertinent to subjoin the ensuing Experiment . I took a Cube of wood 4 inches square , and very near of an equal specifick weight of the like Moles of water ; for it did not rise half an inch above the water , and being let down to subside freely in a Vessel brim-full of water , it threw over a portion of water very near of the same weight with it self , viz. 28 ounces and a half . This Cube being laid into a Vessel of 8 inches deep of water , therefore was raised at his Base about 4 inches above the water in the Base of the Vessel , which water sustained it . And now it had been unquestionable that if a body of less than 4 inches thick , had been subjected under the Cube , it would have sustained no pressure from the water nor from the Cube , which was entirely born up to that height by the subjacent water . But if the body subjected to the Cube , had been 5 , 6 or 7 inches thick , it would have been pressed upon by various proportions from the impending Cube . For fixing a string and hook to the middle of the Superficies of the Cube , it required near 12 ounces in the opposite Scale , to raise the Superficies 2 inches above the water ; near 20 ounces to raise it 3 inches above the water ; and near 28 ounces and a half to raise the lower Superficies of the Cube equal in height to the upper Superficies of the water , which answered the full weight of the Cube of wood ; and therefore according to these proportions , it would gravitate upon a subjacent body that gave it the like elevations . But in water we see the pressure different from the pressure of such a wooden Cube ; for in whatsoever depth the subjected body is immersed , whether deeper or shallower , it sustains no sensible difference of the pressure of the Column of water impending upon it , nor indeed any sensible pressure at all , though at five or ten fathoms deep ; which , as it gives us the difference between the pressure of a solid and fluid body , upon a body in water subjected to it , so it gives us the reason of it , viz. the pressure of the solid body is impeded only by the subjected water , bearing it up , viz. sustinendo . But there are two impediments that hinder the pressure of the superior water upon the lower water on the body under it , viz. the sustentation of the superior water by the inferior ; and likewise the lateral and declivous motion of the water , refracting its perpendicular pressure , while it is solute water . And now because that the various habitudes of heavier or lighter bodies immersed in fluids heavier or lighter than themselves , seems to be a pleasant , and possibly a useful Speculation , and yet is difficult to be distinctly , and explicitly , and clearly declared : And possibly in what is before said in this Observation , the same is not so distinctly delivered as might be wished ; I shall therefore desire the Readers pardon , if I resume and repeat much of what is before said , and digest the whole in somewhat a clearer method . First , I shall declare the difference between the terms of intrinsick and extrinsick weight , whether of fluids or solids , and what I mean by those terms , and how one body is said to exceed another in intrinsick or extrinsick weight , or both ; That body which hath more of bodily Moles or Matter than another body of the same dimension , is intrinsecally heavier than that body which hath the same dimension , and yet hath less corporeal Matter or material Substance in it ; and therefore is denser and crasser than the latter , and the indication of that density and crassitude is by the over-weight it hath over the other body ; as a cubique inch of Gold is heavier , and therefore hath more of material substance than a cubique inch of Brass or Iron ; and a cubique inch of Mercury is heavier , and therefore hath more of material substance in it than a cubique inch of water . And therefore a heavier body immersed into a lighter fluid , as a cubique inch of Gold , Brass , Iron , &c. into water , though it take up but the room and dimension of a like cubique inch of the water wherein it is immersed , must needs sink into the water , and drive up that cubique inch of water in its motion of descent ; for it out-weighs it : and as in an artificial ballance , the Scale that is charged with the greater weight , raiseth up the other that hath the lesser ; so it is in this natural libration between the heavier body and the lighter fluid . And that I may here say it once for all , there is a most perfect analogy between the artificial Ballance and this natural Ballance , in relation to the motions of and in fluids ; and he that means to have a true image of the latter , must attain it best by comparison of it with the former . A body that is specifically or intrinsecally lighter than another , yet by accession , or accumulation , or acquisition of more parts of Matter than another body intrinsecally heavier , hath , may thereby extrinsecally , and in denomination , and also in its effect of preponderation , be heavier than that other ; as two pounds of water is heavier extrinsecally , and in preponderation than a pound of Gold , though intrinsecally heavier : And therefore , if a Cube or Cylinder of wood be supposed intrinsecally lighter than water , yet if such a Cylinder of wood , weighing 4 pounds , be immersed into a like cylindrous Vessel of water , which water hath not 4 pounds of weight , the cylinder of wood will sink , and will not emerge , because in extrinsick weight it exceeds the extrinsick weight of the water in the Vessel into which it is immersed . But if the water be of the weight of four pound and a half ( and in a due position , as shall be shewed ) the cylinder of wood will rise and swim in the water , because , now as well the extrinsick , as the intrinsick weight of the wooden cylinder is over-weighed by the water . If a body that is intrinsecally heavier , be immersed into a body intrinsecally lighter , as Gold into water , it will subside , as hath been said : But yet a body intrinsecally heavier than the fluid wherein it is immersed , may accidentally be extrinsecally lighter than the body wherein it is immersed , namely , when it acquires a Bulk or capacity so large , that a like Moles of water will be of a greater weight than such an immersed body specifically and intrinsecally heavier , and then that body , though intrinsecally heavier , will swim upon the water , and be sustained by it . The most obvious Instances of this kind , are two , viz. 1. When that body intrinsecally heavier is mingled and concreted with other bodies intrinsecally lighter than the fluid wherein it is immersed , and so the whole concrete immersed body weighs less than the like Moles of water would weigh ; as where a small quantity of Gold or Lead is mingled with a greater quantity of wood lighter than water , and so both make up a concrete body lighter than so much water . 2. When the body intrinsecally heavier , is formed into a Cavity , as in Tin , Silver or Lead-Bottles , though the Material be specifically heavier than water , yet if they have such a dimension as that a quantity or Moles of water , of the same external dimension , will exceed such Bottle ( as it stands empty ) in weight , this body intrinsecally heavier , yet extrinsecally is lighter than the water wherein it is immersed , and therefore will be sustained by it . And upon this reason it is that Ships and other Vessels are born up by the water , although they are often lad●● with great Ordnance , Bullets , and other things intrinsecally heavier than the like quantity of water ; yet in as much as the whole Ship or Vessel hath a great Cavity , and takes up room in the Sea , proportionable to that structure , and a Moles of water commensurate to the hull of the Ship , as it hath that concave posture , is of much greater extrinsick weight than the Vessel , therefore it is born up and sustained by it . And thus a body intrinsecally heavier than a fluid wherein it is immersed , may be extrinsecally lighter . 1. In respect of its concretion or composition . 2. In respect of its structure and cavity , which gives a greater amplitude to it . That body is said to be both extrinsecally and intrinsecally heavier , when it exceeds another body in both respects , as an Ingott of Gold that weighs two pounds , is both extrinsecally and intrinsecally heavier than an Ingot of Silver , weighing only one pound . And thus far concerning weight extrinsick and intrinsick . Secondly , The Second thing which I intend , is , to declare the various habitudes of heavier or lighter bodies , with relation to the fluids in which they are immersed ; whereby possibly much of the Learning and Experience De insidentibus humido , may be explicated , namely , 1. Where a body specifically or intrinsecally heavier , is immersed in a fluid intrinsecally lighter than it self , as Gold , Lead or Iron in water . 2. Where a body is immersed into a fluid of equal weight with it self , which though it may be difficult to attain , yet attainable it is , as shall be shewed . 3. When a body specifically or intrinsecally lighter , is immersed into a fluid , and intrinsecally heavier than it self ; as a Globe or Cube of Fir or Elm into water , which is much heavier intrinsecally than such light Woods . 4. When a body intrinsecally lighter , y●● extrinsecally heavier than that portion of fluid wherein it is immersed , be equal in weight to it , as where a Globe or Cube of Fir or Elm , weighing six pounds , is immersed into a Vessel of water containing just six pounds weight of water , or any quantity less than it . Therefore , 1. If a dense body being immersed in a fluid intrinsecally lighter than it , that dense body will subside to the bottom , though the fluid body in extrinsecal weight be more than forty times of greater extent than such a dense body ; as if a Cube or Globe of Lead or Mercury , though but of an inch diameter , be cast into the deep Ocean , for the Reasons before given , where I treat of the difference between extrinsick and intrinsick disparity of Gravity : Only it hath those Exceptions before given , touching the mixture of such heavier body with a lighter , and the configuration of such dense body into Cavity or hollowness , for the Reasons there given , which I need not repeat . 2. If a dense body be immersed into a fluid of an equal intrinsick weight with such dense body , it is generally thought that such dense body will keep any position that it is put into , if placed near the top , or in the middle , or near the Ballance of the Vessel containing the fluid ( though I have for the most part observed it to rise towards the Superficies of the fluid , and hold its upper Superficies equal to it ) as suppose a Cube of water six inches square weigh 14 pound , a like cubique piece of wood of the same dimension and weight , will stand at all positions in a Vessel of 7 or 8 Gallons of water ; for such a dense Body is as so much water in this respect , they being of equal Bulk , and equal intrinsick weight . But it is a very difficult matter to find just such an equality between Solids and Fluids , being of such different textures . The best Expedient is by a hollow Vial-Glass , reduced to such an equipondium by immission of small leaden Shot into it , till the Glass and Shot arise to the just equipondium of a Bulk of water equal to the whole Superficies of the Glass . 3. When a Body intrinsecally lighter than a Fluid is immersed in such fluid , part of that lighter Body will rise above the Superficies of the water , or other Fluid into which it is immersed , and will leave so much of it self under the Superficies of the water , as is equal to a Body or Bulk of water fully commensurate to the whole weight of such immersed Body . For instance , Suppose a Globe of light wood of six inches diameter weigh 5 pound , and a globular portion of water of the like diameter weigh 10 pounds , this globe of wood immersed in a large Vessel of water , will rise so that one half thereof will be above the Superficies of the water and the other half will be below the Superficies of the water ; for the intrinsick weight of the water is double to the intrinsick weight of the wood ; so that a portion of water equal to half the Globe of wood , weighs as much as the whole Globe of wood . And the like proportion will hold where the Globe of wood is lighter than the like portion of water by one third , or one fourth , or one sixth part , mutatis mutandis . 4. If a gross Body ( suppose of wood ) specifically lighter than the like quantity of water , be immersed into a quantity of water extrinsecally lighter than that immersed Body , that Body , though specifically and intrinsecally lighter , will not rise from the bottom of the Vessel , but will sink down to the Base or bottom of the Vessel , and remain contiguous to it , notwithstanding the intrinsecal overweight of the water to the immersed Body ; as if in the former instance , a Globe of wood of 6 inches diameter , and 5 pound weight , be lighter by half intrinsecally than the like portion of water , if this Globe of wood be immersed into a cylindrous Vessel of 7 or 8 inches diameter containing 4 pound weight , nay 5 pound weight of water , the Globe of wood shall not swim nor rise from the Base of the Vessel , and the reason is apparent , because though in intrinsick weight , the water is double to that wood , yet in extrinsick weight the Globe of wood in one instance exceeds , in the other instance equals the extrinsick weight of the water , and so the intrinsick weight of the water , is over-matched by the extrinsick weight of the wood , and therefore cannot preponderate it , nor consequently drive it up ; as in a pair of Scales , if there be two pound of Feathers in one Scale , and but a pound of Lead in the other , the pound of Lead , though intrinsecally heavier than the Feathers , will not raise the Scale of the Feathers , but will be raised up by them ; and if in one Scale there be two pound of Feathers , and in the other two pound of Lead , neither Scale will be raised by the other , but stand in a state of rest , because in Aequilibrio . 5. If a Cube or Globe of wood of six inches diameter , and weighing six pound , be but half so heavy as the like Globe or Cube of water ( weighing for the purpose 13 pound ) and be immersed into a Vessel of water ten or twenty foot square , which is filled with water only to two inches deep ; though this water be of an intrinsick double weight to the Cube or Globe of wood , and extrinsecally it may be above forty times more weighty than that Cube or Globe of wood ; yet that Cube or Globe of wood will subside to the Base of the Vessel , or rest there in contiguity to it , without any swimming or bearing up above the Base of the Vessel . And the reason is , because the strength of the pressure of water is alwayes secundum altitudinem vel profunditatem , and not at all secundum latitudinem vel amplitudinem ; and the water in the Vessel rising but two inches high , doth not equal the half weight of the Cube or Globe , which requires somewhat more than three inches of water to overmatch the extrinsecal weight of the Cube of wood , without which , it will not be moved by the preponderation of the water ; but the wood will preponderate the energy of that expanded water , or at least be in aequilibrio with it , and so not moved from the Base of the Vessel . 6. But if in the Instance last given , a Globe of wood of six inches diameter and six pounds weight , being but of half the weight of the like Globe of six inches diameter of water ( weighing therefore 12 pound ) be immersed into a cylindrous Vessel of water of 7 or 8 inches diameter , and of such a depth as may hold 7 or 8 pound of water , without being forced over by the immission of the wooden Globe into it , and let there be but 7 or 8 pound of water powred into it , and then let the Globe of wood of half the intrinsick weight of the water be put into it ; or let the wooden Cube be first put in , and then the 7 pound of water ; here the water between the Base of the wooden Globe and the Base of the Vessel , it may be , will not be an inch deep ; but the water in the sides of the cylindrous Vessel may rise four , five , or six inches higher . In this Instance , this wooden Globe will swim , and the reason is plain . 1. Because the water in the Vessel is not only intrinsecally , but also extrinsecally heavier than the Globe of wood , this weighing only 6 pounds , and the water in the Vessel 7 or 8 pounds ; but that over-weight of water alone would not be sufficient to bear up the Globe of wood , as is shewed in the next precedent Observation . Therefore , 2. The immediate reason thereof is , because the ambient or lateral water between the Globe and the Vessel , riseth to above half the diameter of the wooden Globe , and presseth secundum altitudinem , upon the little portion of water next the Base of the Vessel , as a weight of water of near 7 or 8 pound and so exceeds the whole weight of the Globe of wood . But if by reason of the amplitude of the Vessel , the lateral water encircling the Globe of wood , had risen but an inch or two above the Base of the Globe of wood , that would never raise the Globe of wood from the Base of the Vessel , but there it would stand contiguous to the Base of the Vessel ; or if the Globe of wood were put into such a Vessel of water , it would sink to the bottom , for it preponderates the weight of the water in such a position ; these Figures will explain it . In the lesser Vessel A B , where the 7 or 8 pound of water riseth never so little above the diameter of the wooden Globe C , the wooden Globe of six inches diameter , and 6 pound weight , will swim : But in the greater Vessel , or where by reason of its amplitude , the lateral water doth not arise above the diameter of the Globe , the Globe will not swim , but rest contiguous to the bottom , though the water in that Vessel were 20 or 40 pound weight . REMARK XXI . THis Remark is sufficiently answered before , where I say that heaviness in bodies , is an intrinsick quality , that it is not mobility at large , but a special or specifick mobility , whereby its Gravitation is naturally determined to be central . That mobility upward in heavy Bodies , is occasional and accidental , and not purely natural , as a heavy body . I must confess , I do not understand what the Remark means , when it says , that Water hath no tendency to motion downward , but when it is out of its place , what is meant by the place of Water ? Is it a place determinate with relation to the position of the Vniverse ? If so , we find no place in Nature , but the Water will descend from it , unless it be in the very indivisible Center , which though it be the termination of its motion , was surely never intended for its place , because never ample or capable to receive it ; let the water be in the Ocean , or in the middle Region of the Air , or in the Bowels of the Earth , it will still , as a heavier Body , descend , if it be not impeded : Or , is the place of it , that place where any portion of water is placed ; suppose in a Vessel upon my Table , or upon the top of my House , or on the top of a Steeple ; yet there this water will still descend if it be not impeded ? Or is it , that the Water having gotten into any place in its fluid consistence , it is now become its natural place per occupationem , and all other Bodies invading that place , are intruders , and put it out of its place , and so give it a Nisus downward ? But the Water it self , when I remove a Vessel of it out of the River , into a Boat , or upon the Shore , invades the place that the Air before had , and so cannot be the proper place of the Water . So that upon the whole account , the Water unless otherwise impeded , must necessarily move downward in all positions , though sometimes it hath an accidental or consequential motion upwards ; and by reason of its fluidity , a lateral motion : therefore I confess I am to seek what is meant , when it is said that the Nisus of Water downward is occasional , and pro re nata as well as upward , namely when it is out of its place . REMARK XXII , XXIII , XXIV , XXV , XXVI , XXVII , XXVIII . I Answer to the Demand , the Mobility of the Water downward , is natural , being thereunto , as a heavy Body , determined by the Principle thereof , viz. intrinsick Gravity , but the other Motions are either from its fluidity , or occasional . Though it be not pertinent to the Debate , yet it is plain that at the same time Water may have an occasional motion upward or laterally , and yet a natural motion downward . The Bucket of Water weighing 12 pound , will weigh as much when a Tube stopped below and immersed , and then opened below , gives an occasional motion to part of the Water upward into the Tube . And the same is apparent when it drives up a light Rundle of Wood from the Base to the Superficies . The rest of the Remark is principally levelled against Continuity of Water ; the contrary whereof is here affirmed to be proved in the former Remarks . Indeed I find this often said , but without any proof that I can find . And indeed it requires a very evident proof ; for its Continuity is affirmed by all others that I know of , and is evident to some . Concerning the motion and pressure of Sand , I have said enough ; only where it is said , that an Animal is not damnified under a high heap of Sand , may have some such reason as the suspension of Fluids ; I freely agree herein ; for , as I take it , the Animal is protected in both by the Mechanism of the incumbent parts , but not by such Hylarchical Principle as the Author supposeth . REMARK XXIX , XXX . THat the natural gravitation downward , is not inconsistent with an occasional gravitation lateral ; yea , and in some cases vertical , is most evident by what hath been said upon the last Remark : And therefore those other actual gravitations are not bare imaginations , but may be as real effects in Nature ; as when a Bullet is shot out of a Gun in a horizontal Line , at the same time there is a conatus ad motum Horizontalem & Centralem ( for otherwise the Bullet could never sink from a straight Line ) the former is conatus ad motum violentum , and the latter ad motum naturalem . But as to the distinction that I make between the fluid Water in the Bucket and the Bucket , containing an entire Cylinder , constituted both of the Bucket and Water in it , and that the latter hath one simple motion downward , as a heavy Body , or as a Keg of Ice ; but the fluid water in the Bucket , had as a fluid Body , those various motions , which in this Chapter I assign unto it . I must confess , when I wrote it , I thought , and still think it so plain , and intelligible , and evident , that I wonder it should not be understood , or should be thought a repugnancy in Nature . The Water in the Bucket is perfectly a fluid Body , and hath its perpendicular motion downward ; which is simply natural to it as a heavy Body , and its lateral motion belonging to it , as a fluid Body ; by which it would drive out the sides of the Bucket , near the top , especially , were it not well fenced ; and though by the strong gards of the Bucket , it be kept in , that it cannot effect what it endeavours ; yet it hath still its conatus ad motum lateralem ; but that conatus is still kept in by the strong sides and bottom of the Bucket . But the Bucket of Water is now one entire aggregate Body consisting of Wood formed into a Cylindraceous form , and Water contained within it , and so presseth simply centrally , as if the Water were congealed into Ice ; or as if Water and Earth were mingled together into one solid Mass , in which Instances the Bucket of Water presseth not as a fluid Body of Water , but as a common solid aggregate Body . And now if you ask , But why doth not the Bucket of Water press laterally as well as the Water in the Bucket ? The Answer offers it self , even before the Question asked ; because the sides of the Bucket are solid , and not fluid , and can no more press laterally upon the circumjacent Air , than if they were empty of Water ; the Water within the Bucket presseth upon the interior sides and cavity of the Bucket , but is restrained from pressing farther by the contignation of the Bucket , but the convexity of the sides of the Bucket do not , cannot press upon the ambient Air ; and so the whole weight is discharged from it in a central direction , as in truth it doth alwayes in a solid Body . And the consequence that would be drawn from hence , that then Water congealed should be heavier than the same Water solute , is the vainest inference imaginable ; for the Water as one common Body , had the same , and possibly a little more weight before its congealing , than after ; and though its congealing hinder the various motions of it as a fluid Body , it doth not encrease nor considerably impair its weight upon the Scale as a heavy Body . Methinks the Reasoning of the Remarker in this Case , is just as if a ship were sayling from North to South , a man should say it were unconceptible that a Passenger should walk upon the Deck from South to North ; for then he should be moved with two contrary motions , and of contrary terminations at the same time , and yet is apparently true , that at the same time he is moved ad motum Navis , from North to South , and ad motum proprium , from South to North : so the same Vessel of water , as it is one entire heavy bulk , hath simply its central termination ; yet the several included fluid parts in their fluid consistence , have and may have various terminations , as well lateral or inclining , as perpendicular or central . But to put a period to this Debate , when I speak of the various motions of fluids as fluids , I speak of the motions of the parts of that common body which is fluid , and those are horizontal , per declive , lateral and central . But when I speak of its motion as one common body , then it is true the motion is central , which is its motion of natural gravitation upon the Scale ; and therefore 12 pound of water without relation to the Vessel wherein it is , will weigh still 12 pound upon the Scale , and yet its parts have those several motions before described , which abate not the weight of the whole Mass , but correct the particular pressures of it , and the several parts thereof while in fluore . And by way of illustration of what I say , take these few Instances ; a Barrel of new Wine or Beer , suppose it weigh 100 pound , after a little time , it will gain a motion of fermentation ; which by reason it proceeds from heat , is principally upward , towards the Superficies , yet notwithstanding this motion , the Barrel of Beer or Wine , will as a heavy body , weigh as much as before the excitation of tha● motion , unless some of the Liquor b● spent at a vent , or break the Barrel . In Animals there is a great variety of the motions , not only of the Spirits , but of the Blood , the Chyle , the Lympha , and most considerably upward towards the Head and superio● parts of the Body , whereupon it wa● supposed by some Learned men , tha● the Body of a dead Animal that by such death had lost none of his blood should weigh more than the same body living ; but upon strict trials it hath been found that the weight continues the same upon the Scale ; so that the various motions of the Blood , Humors , Chyle and Lympha , which are of a different , yea , and in many respects , of a contrary termination to that of natural gravity , doth not only consist with the proper motion of gravity of the whole Moles Corporea , but doth not so much as abate it ; yet these particular partial motions of the Blood , Humors , Chyle and Latex , may one correct the other . And the same I say of Water ; though there be particular motions of its parts , as a fluid body , and those correct and refract one another ; yet the motion of the entire Moles Corporea , as constituting one entire body , retains its entire weight upon the Scale , viz. 12 pound , and this without any repugnancy to , or diminution of the Laws of Nature , in relation to the descent of heavy bodies to the Center . Take a Ballance , and charge one Scale with 3 pound weight , the other with 2 pound weight , the preponderation of the Scale with 3 pound weight , will raise up the Scale with 2 pound weight , so that in a relative consideration between the weights , the latter hath no sensible gravitation , and yet the hand that holds the Ballance , will sustain and feel in both Scales together the weight of 5 pound ; and it were an unreasonable way of argumentation to urge , that because the lighter weight hath lost its actual gravitation in relation to the heavier weight , therefore the weight of both should be but 3 pound , which is the preponderating weight of the heavier Scale . 1. That notwithstanding this aequipondium in this Instance between the 2 pound and 4 pound , whereby the relative weight of each is abated , yet the entire Engin with its weights , will weigh 6 pound besides the weight of the Engin. 2. That by the declivity of the motion of D , it loseth half of that weight that it would have in a direct descent from C to B ; and so this accidental interposition of a motion per declive , corrects that natural gravitation that is truly central and perpendicular . 3. But yet it doth not wholly remove or take it away , only the declive termination or direction takes off one half of the actual perpendicular or central gravitation . And this Instance explicates , and in a great measure proves what I have said , and evinceth that these 29 , 30 Remarks are not of that moment as the Remarker takes them to be . So that upon the whole Matter , though a Tun of Water in a Vessel , weigh 2000 pound weight , and that a man being laid upon his back in the bottom of that Vessel , be subjected to a Pile or Column of Water , equal in Base to the half of that Tun of Water , yet the man shall not be pressed with 1000 pound weight of Water , nor the 1000 th part thereof ; and yet the whole Vessel of Water , or the whole water in the Vessel , shall nevertheless weigh 2000 pound , upon the Reasons given in the 7 th and 8 th Chapters of the Essay , without the help of an Hylarchical Spirit , whether intelligent , sentient , or plastick only . And thus I have done with the Remarks upon the Pamphlet , called , An ESSAY touching the Gravitation of Fluids : The Brief of what I have herein and there delivered , are as followeth . I. That there seems to me a double Reason of the Non-gravitation of Fluids upon Bodies within them of a narrower Base at least , than the Base of the whole Moles of the Water incumbent upon them ; namely , 1. Mechanical , which is principally sustinendo ; the inferior parts of the Water sustaining and bearing up the superior , as analogical to the sustentation of the superior parts of Sands or other minute Bodies by the inferior . 2. Natural , premendo ; which is the motion of the parts of Water it self , as a fluid , though withal a heavy Body ; which being per declive , and very near horizontal , corrects the central gravitation . II. That although the Moles of Water , considered as one common Mass or Moles , moves as a heavy Body , in a central termination , yet the Water and its parts considered in their fluid consistency , have differing motions , as a fluid body , and with various terminations , viz. central , lateral , and per declive , which check and refract the pressure of each other ; so that the entire pressure of the parts of water is not all one way , because a fluid Body , though as one entire Moles , it press with one single central termination as a heavy body , yet the parts thereof in their common consistency , have various motions or Conatus ad motum . III. That although the various Conatus ad motum of the parts of water in fluore , do correct the motions of water , in relation to their terminations , as a fluid body , whereby Divers ( Urinatores ) are not pressed to death , yet these motions of its parts , as a fluid body , do not abate or alter the common motion of the whole Moles , when in one collection , in its central termination , as a heavy body . IV. That besides these motions incident to Water , as a heavy or a fluid body , there are or may be certain accidental motions ab extrinseco , which may give water a vertical ascending motion of pressure , by an external force , as that motion which ariseth by circumpulsion , where it meets with a lighter body below the Superficies , as in that of the Rundle of a lighter body , as a Rundle of Wood , the rising up of Water into a Tube full of Air , the instance of the value given in the ensuing Remarks ; all which , though they partly happen from the fluidity of water , yet they are effected from an accidental interposition , and most ordinarily are consequential upon a descent of the Water first , all which motions of parts of fluids arising either ab extrinseco , or from its fluidity , yet are consistent with its intrinsecal quality of a heavy body , and the motion or Conatus ad motum of the entire Moles thereof in a central termination or motion towards the Center , which I usually express by a central motion or termination . Touching the REMARKS upon Difficiles Nugae . REMARK I. I Now come to the Second Course of Remarks upon Difficiles Nugae , and begin with the first . In this Remark the Learned Author hath fallen upon one of the subtillest Subjects in Philosophy , and such as would require more than a small Treatise to give a tolerable accompt touching it , namely , Rarefaction and Condensation . I have more largely given an account of my thoughts touching it , in the beginning of this Book ; whereby it will appear whether the Principles I take up , are unproved ; or whether they or the Remarkers Principles be , or can be proved by any Experiment or Reason in Nature , or whether his Principles or mine are such as are repugnant to Reason , and absurd , if we closely canvass them , and more considerately search into them . It was not in that place here remarked upon , necessary to prove them , but to suppose them ; the proof was therefore there omitted : I having therefore now in the beginning supplied that defect in some measure . REMARK II. THe Learned Remarker mistakes the Scope of the Assertion ; it is true that the conjunction of solid heavy bodies contribute to their weight , and consequently to the motion of the whole solid body downward . But the actual gravitation of one part upon another , is suspended by their continuity , the lower parts receiving , and sustaining , and so de facto suspending the actual gravitation of the upper parts upon the lower ; so that although the superior parts contribute to the total weight , yet they do not superately and actually gravitate upon the lower parts . REMARK III. I Must confess the substiturion of an Hylarchical Principle to perform all the Phaenomena of motions in Natural Bodies , is a compendious and easie way for the answering of all difficulties : But he that but observes the Instance here endeavoured to be confuted , will find ( as in many others , that I shall hereafter mention ) they do not stand in need of such a help ; for it is meerly Mechanical , from the various Librations of the Water and Oyl , at various immersions , by a kind of inverted natural Ballance between the Water and Oyl in these various positions ; therefore I shall refer the truth of the Solution to the Readers trial , and what hath been before said upon the former Remarks . REMARK IV. IT is cautiously said , that ( in a manner ) I acknowledge what is endeavoured to be proved in the first Remark : For in the Atmosphear the Air is more compounded than above it ; and yet all are connexed together by continuity , and so , in a manner , I do not acknowledge it also . Touching the continuity of the Air , it is said by the Author to be sufficiently disproved ; but it is only said so : And I think the continuity of the Air is sufficiently proved , and in it self most evident , if no proof were offered of it . REMARK V. THe exclusion of innate Gravity , because the parts compressed will sensibly gravitate , but do not sensibly gravitate before compression , seems to me as strange a consequence , as if a man should say , a Feather hath no sensible gravitation , but a peck of Feathers put together , have a sensible gravitation ; therefore there is no such thing as intrinsick gravity in the Feather . REMARK VI. ANd I have before noted , that Continuity consists not in the facility or difficulty of separation of parts , which yet till such separation , are in continuity , and when that separation is past , may grow together into continuity again , by the first contact of the separated parts , as the Air and Water do upon removing of what separates their parts . REMARK VII . IN the 4 th Chapter , pag. 64. of the Nugae , I have given an account touching the various pressure of solute and included water ; namely , that in a Siphon there described , the Water in the open Air poured into the longer Leg , being 24 inches , depressed the Mercury 2 inches and ¼ , and drove it out of the short Leg ; but the solute water in an open Tube incumbent upon the shorter Leg , drove back only one inch , the longer Leg being empty : Now if the impelling down of 2 inches and ¼ of Mercury by the 24 inches of Water in the longer Leg , be no more than the pressing down of one inch of Mercury , by the solute Water of 24 inches deep in the shorter Leg , the Remarker is in the right , and I was in the wrong ; but if these be differing pressures , and the pressing down of one inch of the Mercury by the solute Water leaning upon the short Leg , be less than the pressing of two inches and ¼ by the 24 inches of Water included in the longer Leg , then I was not mistaken ; and a little Arithmetick will serve to discover it . The Remark gives this Answer to this part of the Experiment , That more was impelled up by the solute Water , because the shorter Leg was wider , and so required more Mercury in the other Leg to counterpoise it . But to give the Remark satisfaction herein , I have made a most exact scrutiny into this part of the Experiment ; and to the Objection I give these Answers . 1. The Cavity of the Siphon in the shorter Leg was ⅛ parts of an inch , or ¼ of half an inch , the breadth of the Cavity of the longer Leg was not the 40 th part of an inch less than the shorter , which is so small a disproportion that it could scarce be sensible , and this upon an exact admeasurement : And again , when the Mercury in the shorter tube was depressed an inch by the solute Water incumbent upon it , there was not any visible difference between the extent of the Mercury driven up in the longer , and depressed in the shorter Leg , both being indistinguishably the same , viz. an inch subsiding in the shorter , and an inch only rising in the longer Leg , which evidenceth the imperceptibleness of the difference . 2. If it gave an advantage of raising of the Mercury , it must be to the shorter Leg , because it had a greater Moles of Mercury in it , and of Water upon it . 3. But the truth is , the pressure of Water or Mercury in an inverted Siphon , is equal , though the amplitude of the Legs differ ; for Fluids in that Instance , press secundum altitudinem or longitudinem , not secundum amplitudinem . A Siphon inverted , having one Leg of 6 inches diameter , and the other but of an inch diameter , filled with Water or Mercury , will have their Superficies of equal heights , notwithstanding the disproportion of their amplitude . This part of the Experiment therefore stands unshaken by the Remark , and therefore surely the Experiment it self , nor the Collection thereupon made by the Remark , gives little countenance to the magnified demonstration mentioned in the Remark , but concludes effectually against it . Indeed as to the second Instance or Trial , which I call the double Trial , pag. 66. it hath reasonably given a just cause of exception , yet not without some Mistake in the Remark , because it was tried when two inches and more of the Mercury was first driven out of the Siphon , by the Water poured into the longer Leg , and therefore I lay no weight upon it ; yet even there , there is a disparity in the pressure of the solute and enclosed water , there being a greater height of water pressing upon the Mercury in the shorter Leg than in the longer : But because this second trial is less evident , I lay it aside ; yet howsoever this doth not impeach the former trial , nor the Conclusion which I lay upon it , viz. that the force of the same Column of water contracted in the longer Leg of the Siphon , and having no other Base but the Mercury it self , is of greater force than the like Column of solute Water in the open Vessel impending upon the shorter Leg , especially since in the one case and the other , the open Air gives the most fair trial to the energy of both : and therefore the disparity of the pressure of enclosed and solute water , which the Remarker is pleasantly disposed to call the Masonry of the water , is not hereby impeached , nor the notable demonstration in the Enchiridion Metaphysicum , by the Rundle of wood any way relieved . And for evidence of the truth of the pressure of water secundum altitudinem , and not secundum amplitudinem , and also the disparity of pressure of solute water , and water under a constriction to a narrow Basis , I have observed that if a Tube of half an inch diameter , and 4 foot high , with a Lumen of a quarter of an inch diameter in the side near the Base , be filled with water , the parabolical Line that the water will make out of that Vessel in its first exsilition , will be as long , yea , and somewhat longer than the like parabolical Line made in the first exsilition , by the like Lumen out of a Vessel of six inches diameter , and the same height , which must needs proceed from the greater pressure by that Column of water that hath an equal height , but a Base of more equality to the Lumen , according to the subjoined Figure . REMARK VIII , IX . THe true reason of the rising of the Rundle of wood is neither from the Spirit of Nature , nor from an Hylarchical Principle , but from the plain common known Rules of Hydrostaticks , whereby necessarily a fluid Body drives up a solid Body lighter than it self , to the Superficies , if it can by any means in the least proportion , insinuate it self between the Rundle and the Base of the Vessel , and this is done by circumpulsion . But as touching Stevinus his Experiment of the Rundle covering a pertuse or hole in the Basis of the Vessel , I must needs say , Stevinus delivers it in his Observations upon the 10 th . Proposition of his Hydrostatiques , from whence I transcribe it , pag. 94. of the Nugae . I have said enough touching this Business before upon Remark 19 , 20. upon the Essay ; I shall therefore shortly collect somewhat of what is there more fully delivered . If the Rundle of Wood be specifically lighter than a portion of water equal to its Moles , and the Rundle be pressed down as contiguous as may be to the plain Basis of the Vessel , yet it will rise ; for by reason of the porosities and chamfers of the wood , all the industry imaginable will not press it so close , but there will be some interstitia between the Rundle and the Basis or bottom of the Vessel into which the Water will creep , and so undermine and drive up the Rundle to the Superficies of the Water , by an ascending pressure of the Water , which ascending pressure is nevertheless wrought and effected first by a descent of the water round the sides of the Rundle , and so by a kind of Ballance , overweighing the Rundle of wood , and thereupon necessarily weighing it up . 2. If the Rundle be closely fixed to the bottom by a viscous , or glutinous , or thick Oylie matter , that the water cannot get under it , the Rundle will not rise , upon this double account . 1. Because that adhering Oyl by the mutual adhesion to the Rundle and Base , renders the Rundle consequentially , and effectively , and extrinsecally heavier by its adhesion , than the like Moles of Water , whereby the Water cannot raise it . But , 2. and principally , Because the interposed viscous Oyl doth obstruct the migration or insinuation of the Water between the Rundle and Basis or bottom of the Vessel , and so it cannot get under it to drive it up ; but stands now as one common fixed Base of the Vessel united to the true Base thereof , 3. If there be a hole in the bottom of the Vessel , suppose of two inches diameter , and the Rundle of light wood be 4 inches diameter , and so overlap the Orifice , the Rundle will not rise , because the Water , notwithstanding all the care imaginable , will creep under the sides of the Rundle , and discharge it self gradually through the hole ; for the water having never so little passage through the pertuse or hole , though not commensurate to the 40th . part of its amplitude , will contend and press that way , and so gravitate upon the Rundle that lies in its way , by its Conatus ad motum to that Orifice , where it finds never so little vent that it may discharge it self ; for the water pressing upon and through the Orifice , doth necessarily press upon the interposed Rundle . 4. And if the Rundle of wood could be kept so close to the bottom , either by its own exquisite smoothness ( which is hardly possible ) or by any viscous Oyl , or by any fixation to the bottom or Base of the Vessel , now it stands as one common Base to the water , as the rest of the bottom of the Vessel doth , and is of no use to explicate the Phaenomenon ; for it is all one as if it were one continued solid Base to the Vessel , unmoved and unmoveable by the water . And this upon more than one trial , I find true ; and when duly weighed , it makes nothing in favour of the Remarkers Hypothesis , or to the disadvantage of my Supposition in the Essay , though I confess it doth more distinctly and clearly explicate the Phaenomenon . REMARK X. THe adequate Reason is truly given by me , if the Glass were excessively strong , or if it were filled with water , it would not break , because the internal water bears as strongly against the external pressure of the external water , as that can downward against it . As we see in making new Cuts and Rivers ; if there be a River with a small or weak bank on its South side , and another Cut of Water be made on the South side of that slender Bank , the water in the River will not break the Bank ; for the adjacent Cut filled with water , strengthens the Bank by its renitence ; but if the Cutt be empty of water , the Bank of the River will break , because the conterminous Air is not of strength enough to balance it . The sides of the Glass-Bottles of themselves being too weak to protect them , and the included Air capable of compression by the heavier Element of water , it wants strength to protect it , and so breaks . But as for the Air being out of its place when under water , I have observed enough before of the vanity of that Reason , and the ensuing Remarks will give me occasion to re-inforce it . REMARK XI . IF the Remarker had been pleased to take notice of what is so often mentioned in both the Tracts upon which he remarks , and is of infallible truth , that the pressure of water in this Instance and divers others , is never secundum amplitudinem , but secundum altitudinem : Much of this Remark might have been spared , and the censure of absurdity would have been reserved to better purpose ; for the water in the Pipe of one quarter of an inch diameter , must be counterpoised with a Cylinder of external water , of equal height and length to that in the Tube . And if the height be less , though the amplitude of the Water be more , it will not counterpoise it in this motion . REMARK XII , XIII . I Come to the Instance which I call the Valve , he calls the Obturaculum . I have given my reason of that Phaenomenon , why the Obturaculum will not subside in such an immersion into water ; this is the Subject of Cap. 6. Nugarum , pag. 102 , &c. and in the Observation upon the Remark ; which is this in effect . When the whole Tube with its Valve closed , is counterpoised with a portion of water of greater , or at least , equal weight to the whole instrument , and of equal Bulk to so much thereof as is immersed in the water , the whole Engin must necessarily swim ; for it is in aequilibrio with , or preponderated by so much water , which it displaceth by its immersion . And it is in effect no other , than if a Cylindrical Body , suppose a Cane , were of two inches diameter , and of two foot long , the bottom filled about an inch with Lead , and then 11 inches with Water , and the rest with Air , and suppose the whole Cane were lighter than the like Bulk of Water , so that a Moles of water countervailing 12 inches of this Cylinder , would counterpoise it , it is absolutely necessary that this Cylinder must swim perpendiculary and erect in the water at an immersion of twelve inches ; for the water bearing against its Basis , must necessarily sustain it at that height . And perfectly the same reason is that which keeps up the Obturaculum , by pressing against it at the bottom ; which now is as it were one common piece of the whole Latin Cylinder or Valve ; And this aequilibrium is the true Cause of its sustentation . But the Remarker hath given us another kind of Solution ; which if I understand aright , is to this purpose , that in this Instance the Air is out of its place being in the Latin Cube below the Superficies of the Water , and that the Spirit of Nature , or the Principium Hylarchicum , to rescue it from this inconvenience , draws up the Air , and drives down the contiguous water , and therewith draws and drives up the Obturaculum , which by the Abituriency ( as it is called ) of the Air , is sustained : And as a strong proof hereof , it is said both in the Remark , and in the Enchiridion Metaphysicum , that if the Tube be stopped near the Sucker or Obturaculum , it will by no means be sustained ; because now the Obturaculum is not concerned in the abiturience of the Air thus separated from it by the interposed obstruction . This I call an obscure Solution ; and had I then searched into it , as I have done since , I should have stiled it a mistaken Solution ; for so it is . 1. I do not understand how the Air is out of its place , when it fills the Tube below the Superficies of the Water , any more than if the Vessel were placed upon a Steeple , the Air on either side reaching below the fund of the Vessel , it may be 40 yards , were out of his place , because the Bucket of Water stands above it . 2. Neither do I understand how the Spirit of Nature is concerned to fetch up the Air out of the Tube , or to bring the water into the Tube ; but it is performed by a plain statical necessity , and the relative pressure of the Water upon the Basis of the Tube , being lighter than the like Moles of Water . 3. Be it in his place , or out of his place ; if the instance given by the Remarker of the falling off of the Valve or Obturaculum , when another Obturaculum is interposed , were as true as it is confidently affirmed , there might have some relief thereby been given to the Solution , which I called obscure : But most plainly it is not true ; and by frequent trials I have found that notwithstanding that interposed stopping a little above the Sucker , or Obturaculum , the Obturaculum will continue suspended as well as if there were no such interposed stoppage . I took a Latin Tube of two foot five inches long , and one inch and a quarter diameter , with its Valve and Obturaculum closely fitted each to other , but so as with its own weight the Obturaculum would subside in the open Air , the weight of the whole Engin weighed 12 ounces and a half and 9 d weight . I stopped the Tube within less than ah inch above the Obturaculum with Cork , so every way encompassed with a strong Cement , that all possible intercourse between the superior Air and the lower brazen Obturaculum was entirely stopped . The Valve or Obturaculum being put up , and the Tube immersed into a full Vessel of Water , subsided to 18 inches depth , and thereby drave over a portion of Water equal in weight to the weight of the Engin , and equal in Bulk or Moles to the 18 inches of the Engin immersed in the Water ; and all this while the Obturaculum stuck fast ; I therefore gently raised the Engin till it came within 5 or 6 inches of the Superficies of the Water , and yet it continued sustained till it was raised to such a height as the weight of the Obturaculum counterpoised a Column of Water commensurate in weight unto it , and so long the Obturaculum continued suspended ; but when the Tube was lifted higher , so that the aequipondium between the Obturaculum and the like Moles of Water was lost , then the Obturaculum fell down , as in the instance of the Valve , that had no such interposed obstruction . This was the event of this Experiment often made , and will doubtless fall out upon any other mans Trial , if it be carefully and soberly put in ure . Only this must be remembred , if the Obturaculum be not very true and exact , but that the water comes in considerably between the Obturaculum and the Valve , the Obturaculum will fall off after a little while at least , as well in this , as in the unstopped Tube described in the Fifth Chapter of the Nugae , partly by reason of the laxness of its adhesion , and partly by reason of the additional weight of water getting in above the lower Obturaculum . And yet it must be remembred also , that though there be the greatest care imaginable used , if the Obturaculum be so lax as to fall from the Valve in the open Air , though it be so close as to stick together in the Water , the Water will creep between the Fissures of the Obturaculum and the Valve , with a force , if it have any room to receive it . And whether even that very pressure of the water upwards through that Fissure , may for a while contribute to the bearing up of the Valve ( as in the instance of the Rundles of Wood covering the Orifice in the Base , it contributes to the keeping down of the Rundle ) may be considerable . But howsoever , if it receive too much water , it presseth the Obturaculum the more downward , and thereby in time weakens the adhesion thereof . And now what part hath this Spiritus Naturae to act in this case ? I shall therefore conclude this Remark upon which so great a stress is laid to prove the Hylarchical Principle , and the manner of its sustaining the Obturaculum , by evocating the Air , and its ready obsequious abituriency , to be not so much an obscure , as a mistaken Solution , and bottomed upon a mistaken Experiment . REMARK XIV . IN this Remark , the Author is pleasant with his Hylarchical Principle , attributing to it a pretty kind of Intelligence , only where he sayes , that it is the Pulp , not the Skin of the Finger that feels the monition of the Hylarchical Principle ; it is certainly both ; for the Pulp cannot be attracted , unless the intervening Skin be attracted . The 15 th . Remark will come to be considered hereafter . REMARK XVI . EXception is taken because I say , regularly bodily effects are wrought by contact of some active body upon the Patient : The Remarker might , if he had pleased , have taken notice that I often say , In bodily motions some things act from an inward active principle inherent in them , as the descent of heavy Bodies . Other things there are that are moved by an external or foreign active principle , or at least , some other body put into motion , as in a Clock , the descent of the weight of Lead is ab intrinseco principio , and not by any contact , but the turning about of the Wheels of the Clock , is by the connexion of the Line to the weight , and its circumvolution about the wheel per contactum . To the former I never apply this Axiom , as he calls it , as he himself after in his 37 th Remark fairly confesseth . This active intrinsick principle I call the Law of Nature alligated to heavy bodies ; and if he had called it an Hylarchical Principle , I should not have contended with him about the word : But in these motions ab extrinseco , I dare think at least , he will not deny it to be regularly true . REMARK XVII , XVIII , XIX , XX. THere is no great matter in these , but only touching the porosity of Glass ; and the difficulty of the transition of the Materia Subtilis through it , by the renitence of the Air ; upon which little more need to be said than what occurs before . Only where the Remarker subjoynes that upon the gentle gradual inclining of the Tube of Mercury , yet when it comes to an erect posture the Mercury subsides to 29 inches , is an Argument that there are no such effluvia from the Mercury , to supply the derelicted space in the top of the Tube . This , though often repeated by him in the subsequent Remarks , seems to be no Objection ; for whether the subsiding be more gradual , or more sudden , the compression of the Mercurial parts , and traction upon them , are equal when it attains its perpendicular pressure ; as to use my old comparison , if a man strain a Lute-string from a lower to a higher Note , suppose from an Eighth to a Third , if he do it rapidly , he shall indeed endanger the Lute-string ; but whether it be wound up swifter or slower , the tension of the Lute-string is the same at an equal height , in both motions of the Pin : Indeed while the inclination continues , the pressure and gravitation of the Mercury upon it self , is less , and consequently the tension weaker ; and therefore the portions of Effluvia sent or drawn out in that posture , are less ; but when it comes to an erect perpendicular posture , the pressure and gravitation , and traction and tension is equal , whether that posture be attained suddenly or more leisurely . As to the length of the Tube , or its capacity in the top to receive more Mercury , as I have made the Objection ; so the Answer that I give , that the more Mercury descends , the more effluvia are emitted , seems to me a sufficient Answer , whether the Tube be leisurely or suddenly brought to a vertical posture . REMARK XXI , XXII , XXIII , XXIV , XXV , XXVI , XXVII . THere is in these Remarks no difference between us ; for it seems I write herein according to his Sense ; only in the Solution by me given by Tension , and Rarefaction , and Attraction thereby wrought , It agrees not to his Judgment , as contradicting the instance of the sustaining of the Embolus of the Air-pump , upon which the Enchiridion layes great stress to prove an Hylarchical Principle ; therefore most of the ensuing Remarks are levelled against that Solution . REMARK XXVIII , XXIX , XXX , XXXI . TOuching the various position of the Mercury upon the top and bottom of a Hill , I need not say more than what is said in my 14 th Chapter of the Nugae , and therefore I spare repetition . Touching the reason assigned by the Remark of the swelling of a Bladder , and the raising of Bubbles out of Water and Spirit of Wine in the Air-pump , by me attributed to Tension and Attraction , thereby wrought ; but by the Remarker to a tumultuary agitation of the parts of Water , &c. As he is little satisfied with my explication , so I am as little satisfied with his ; both indeed produce an agitation of the Water in the Glass ; but that which I assign , is regular , orderly and sutable to the effect produced ; but the tumultuary agitation of the Remarker , is confused , irregular , and unproductive of such regular motion ; and besides , is unevident , and contradicted by Phaenomena of like nature ; as we shall see plainly in the Magdeburgh Hemispheres . The Ludicrous Instance , as I call it , of the Attraction of Tobacco through Water , is properly brought in by me in this place , to shew that in many Instances , Attraction may be made through Water , which was seasonable in that place , and proper enough . REMARK XXXII , XXXIII . IN these two Remarks the Remarker endeavours to shew , 1. The Groundlessness of the Solution offered by me to the Torricellian Phaenomena . And , 2. It s Repugnancy . The former he saith he hath shewn in Remark 32. But all that is done to shew it , is to substitute certain inevident , and I think , mistaken Suppositions : As , 1. The perviousness of Glass to the subtiler aerial particles ; this indeed he hath often said , but no where proved ; and if it were admitted , would not only perfectly destroy the apparent Phaenomena in that Instrument , but would utterly confound his Answer to the resiliency of the Mercury upon a sudden lifting up and separation of the Tube from the restagnant Mercury : For what need such a violent resilition where the top of the Tube admits the subtiler aerial particles to pervade the Glass ? 2. The gentle inclining of the Tube to prevent the tumultuary agitation of the Mercury . But what I have shewn in my Observation upon Remark 17 , &c. I think sufficiently discovers the impotence of this Objection . 3. The gravitation upward by a Circle of motion , is utterly unapt to salve the resilition ; for that circulation can be but a slow , gentle motion , and cannot possibly have so rapid a motion by the imaginary straightness of the Channel ; as we may suppose in the Streights in the Sea ; upon which the Ocean presseth ; but this neither can nor need receive a greater portion of subtil Air to relieve it than possibly 2 inches in height , and the 8 th part of an inch in Diameter , where the amplitude of the Tube is no greater . As to the Second , namely , the repugnancy which is assigned . 1. In that I deny a Vacuum , which he saith cannot be by another way prevented , but by the transition of the subtil particles of Air through the Glass ; but such a course of argumentation seems to be of kin to that which is called Petitio Principii , he knows I assign another cause , though he dispute the truth of it . Then he proceeds to the leisurely inclining of the Tube ; which I confess is often repeated , but I think need not be more than once answered , which I think is done in my Observations upon Remark 17 , &c. Then he proceeds to the Argument touching Rarefaction , and the inconvenience of the penetration of dimensions , and so endeavours to prove repugnancies in what is said by a Problem that deserves more discussion than the Argument in hand , as hath been shewed in the beginning of this Book , wherein I have nevertheless expressed my thoughts touching it . I cannot tell what the Remarker imagines or conceives against the cohesion of grosser Bodies by the tension of lighter bodies , but I can tell what is evident to my sense , and so may any that will give his Senses leave freely to determin , without stifling them by Notions , namely , that there is as plain a cohesion in the Magdeburgh Hemispheres ; yea , and in the Torricellian Engin , as there is between things fastned each to other by a string : And therefore I cannot so over-readily change the conviction of my Senses , for a Notion or Conception asserted and magnified , but not proved . But to infer that because Water , which is above 900 times crasser than Air , is not compressible to a sensible smaller room by a great weight , therefore a portion of subtil Matter cannot be extracted out of it or Mercury , with so small a weight as the Mercurial Cylinder , or that the effluvia of Water or Mercury , which are as subtil as Air , cannot be expanded by a less weight than Water compressed into a sensible narrower room , seem hard illations , and very inconsequential ; for we see the heat of a mans hand will expand Air in Weather-Glasses to near a double extension . REMARK XXXIV . I Do prove the attraction of tensed Bodies by the plain evidence of Sense , and I assign the preservation of the continuity of the Universe , as the end thereof , and the supream efficient cause thereof to be , the most wise and powerful Creator of all things , and the immediate effective cause , that instituted Law that he hath placed in things natural ; the immediate instrumental cause in many motions that are not primitive in their Subjects , to be from the singular disposition of the part of the Universe , & their admirable mechanical adaptation each to other . And as to the vicarious Spirit of Nature , as a distinct incorporeal subsistence , when the Author hath given us better proofs thereof than the suspending of Mercury in the Torricellian Experiment , the driving up a Rundle of light wood by the Water , and potentia attractiva of the Embolus of the Air-Pump , and such like petty Instances , together with his bare Notion touching it : It may possibly obtain a better entertainment than yet I find it doth , at least with me . REMARK XXXV . THis Instance in the Bladder and Cupping-Glasses , is passed over in this Remark very lightly , and it was necessary so to be dealt with , because too troublesome to be explicated otherwise than by Tension and Attraction , and it would require an admirable process in the Hylarchical Principle ; to effect this , and some proof besides single Notions and Conceptions of such explication by such a principle . REMARK XXXVI . THe Instance here given , hath put the Remarker to a great deal of pains to find a solution for it and the consequences of it ( for the Hypothesis of Attraction is confidently said to be fully confuted , though it be only so said , but not so done . ) But yet the Hylarchical Principle is at length furnished with an Hylostatical Libration and Hylostatical power of union of the several parts of Water , Air and Glass : And at this rate I confess there will never want a ready solution to any difficulty ; for it is but asserting that the Spirit of Nature is furnished with that effectual power , and the knot is untied or cut , though there be not a Syllable of proof offered for it ; but it is only graffed on to the Hypothesis of the Spirit of Nature by the wit of the Assertor , to accommodate the Hypothesis . REMARK XXXVII . I Refer my self to what is said before in the first Chapter of this Book , and upon the same Remark , there need not be said more . The Laws of Nature were the Laws of God imprinted upon the nature of Physical Beings by his Almighty Fiat ; and though as to particular Beings , he hath substituted particular active principles , usually called Essential and Vital Forms ; yet as to the Universe it self , it seems to be too great an Empire to be put into the vicariat hands of that which is here called the Spirit of Nature . The great God that gave the Laws of Nature , is sufficient without such a Substitute , and is only sufficient for the regiment of so great an Empire ; and this may serve also to Remark 38. We are not disputing whether such a Spirit of Nature be possible to be , but whether de facto it be or not , or that it is necessary that it should be , at least as to those motions which have so evident explication from other principles . REMARK XXXIX . HErein we differ not as to the rejecting of the great Elasticity of the Air. REMARK XL. I Confess when I read the beginning of this Remark , I hoped to meet with such a Solution to the Instance remarked upon , as would be close and clear ; because this Instance bears so hard against most of what the Remarker hath before affirmed ; but I was deceived herein . In this Instance of the Magdeburg Hemispheres , these things are most evident to any mans Sense . 1. That the included Air is certainly expanded and rarefied by the heat , beyond its natural size . 2. That while they are so hot , and the Air so expanded and lax , they do not at all cohere . 3. That as they grow cold , they do most evidently cohere ; so that they will not be divulsed without a considerable strength . 4. That most necessarily as the included Air grows cold , and the heat which was the cause of its expansion ; decayes , so the Air must needs endeavour its restitution to its natural dimension , by contracting it self inward to its natural size . 5. And yet if it have such a degree of heat , as again gives a more lax state to the included Air , the cohesion will cease , and the Hemispheres fall asunder . 6. And as the Remarker confesseth , and the most clear evidence of Sense evinceth , those Phaenomena are not wrought , nor indeed possible to be wrought , either by the weight , pressure or elasticity of the external Air , as the Elaterists would have it . The Consequence of all which is , that certainly as far as Sense can lead us , the Air is rarefied by the Heat ; and as the Heat decayes , the Air endeavours its own contraction , and there necessarily follows , even to our Sense , an attraction upon the sides of the Hemispheres , whereby they cohere ; and that cohesion will continue till relaxed by another accession of Heat , or admission of more Air. But now what doth the Remark propound in this Instance ? Marry , an Hylostatical Spirit , which , pro re nata , works these various Phaenomena , which is only a conjecture , and hath no evidence to prove it besides Notion or Imagination ; but the method of the effecting it by this Hylostatical Spirit , is more admirable , though it is pleasantly offered , that thereby all goes off glibly . And it is to this effect , as I take it . The Hylostatical Spirit finding the subtilty of Matter imprisoned in an undue place between the Hemispheres , presently makes up an occasional Gravitation or Elasticity in the ambient Air to squeeze out the included subtil Matter , and give it liberty , and thereby presseth the Hemispheres together . And so in this glib Hypothesis the Remark doth two things . viz. 1. It creates a weight or elasticity in the ambient Air pro re nata , which as it is in effect contrary to all that he hath before delivered against the weight or elasticity of the Air , so it hath this disadvantage , as is proposed by the Remark , that it is infinitely more incredible than the common Supposition of the Elaterists , and indeed little less than miraculous . And 2. It is a Conatus of this Hylostatical Spirit to no purpose at all , and meerly frustraneous , unless by such an admirable condensation of the ambient Air it could break the brazen Ribs ; whereas indeed it makes the Prison the stronger . I must confess , this Fetch goes not down so easily with me , nor I believe with many more . REMARK XLI . I Come to the Remarks upon the Phaenomena of the Glass-Pump , wherein I attribute the raising of the Water in the Glass to the traction made by the tensed Air in the Shank of the Pump , and the dilatation of the Air in the top of the Glass , by the extraction of the Water . And the reason why after iterated evacuations of the Water by that suction or traction , no more will rise , to be , because the Air in the Bottle hath undergone as great a tension or dilatation as a Pump of that length can give it . These things I must observe touching this Pump . 1. The length of the Shank or Pump if self above the Glass , was not much above fourteen inches , and the Embolus proportionable thereunto , if it had been longer , the attractive force must have been greater , and would probably have given a stronger traction , and consequently a greater expansion , tension or rarefaction to the Air in the upper part of the Glass . 2. That in this Instance here is no misplacing of the Air or Water ; upon which the Author builds much of the activity of his Hylarchical Principle in divers of his Remarks ; for the Air in the Bottle , and in the Shank of the Pump , are both above the scituation of the Water in the Bottle . And here the Author , after some recourse to the impossibility of penetration of dimensions , which he so often inculcates , gives us his Solution , returns to the activity of the Hylostatical Principle , which because the subtil Matter misplaced , invigorates the external Air to do something in this business , but tells us not expresly what , or how , in this place : We shall hereafter , it may be , find what is meant . Only he tells us two things . 1. That it is impossible so heavy a Body as Water , should rise so high into so extream a thin Body in the Glass , and that without fresh Air succeeding . 2. That the Embolus that at the first pumping , overcame the consistence of the Air should as reasonably overcome it still . As to the first , It seems he is now pleased to admit an intrinsick Gravity in the Water , which renders it unwilling to ascend ; but besides , according to the Authors Assertion in his Remarks , the more subtil parts of the Air will pervade the Glass , if that were true , there would be supplemental subtil Air at least , to supply the evacuation of the Water to the last drop . As to the Second , There is nothing more plain to our very Sense , than that any extendible or tensible Body till it be broken , doth more easily yield to the first attempts of its extension , which yet with more difficulty , succeeds afterward as is evident in the Air-Pump and a Lute-string , which is an Instance I frequently use , I confess ; but it explains my meaning ; so that this Remark concludes nothing against what I have delivered in relation to my Glass-Pump , nor to evidence the interposition therein of the supposed Hylarchical Principle . REMARK XLIII , XLIV , XLV , XLVI . BEfore I come to my Observations upon these Remarks , it may be convenient to give an explication of the dimensions of the Glass-Pump that I made use of ; referring my self to the Figure thereof , described in the Nugae , Fig. 21. The whole length from the upper end of the Embolus to the bottom of the Glass-Globe , was near 21 Inches ; whereof the Embolus reaching to D , near as low as H , where the Water was to be pumped out , was about 8 inches from H , to the upper Surface of the Glass , near 4 inches ; from the upper Surface of the Glass to the bottom of it , about 9 inches , which was the diameter of the globular Glass ; the continued Pipe of the Pump being less , running into the Glass about 7 inches , and so at E , opening and ending about 2 inches from the bottom of the globular Glass ; consequently from the lower end of the Sucker at D , to the middle of the globular Glass about 8 inches and a half or 9 inches ; the cavity of the Pump it self near two inches diameter or thereabouts ; so that the Air between the bottom of the Embolus and the top of the Glass , might be a Cylinder of near 2 inches diameter , and about 4 inches long ; by the tension whereof , the Water in half the Glass is by me supposed to be attracted and raised . The other and upper half of the Glass contains the other half of the Globe , and is filled with Air , which contained about 5 pints ; which was more than twenty times the quantity of Air contained in the Pump , between the lower end of the Embolus and the top of the Water . I say , by iterated pumpings I drew out a quart of Water , which made the water subside in the lower half of the Bottle above an inch and an half ; and consequently the Air in the upper half of the Bottle expanded so , that now it contained about 7 pints of Air ; after which , it was not capable of a greater expansion by my small Pump : The Engin it self is more punctually described in the 19 th Chapter of the Nugae ; but the dimensions not so fully mentioned there as here . This Instance I use as an evidence to prove the attraction of the Water by the tension of that little portion of Air in the cavity of the Pump and the sequaciousness of the Water to relieve that tension , and to preserve the continuity of the Mundana Materia which in these Remarks is opposed by my learned Antagonist . And the Instance is opposed upon this account , that the Air in the Glass is tended from 7 to 5 ; whereas the Air in the Pump is tended from 1 to 5 spaces at least , which is said , is an evidence that there is no such tension ; for if there were , the Air in the Glass would receive a greater tension than from 5 to 7 , when the Air in the Pump is supposed to be tended from 1 to 5 , which is ever proportionate to the tension of the Air in the Glass . But surely this is an Objection of no force , for apparent Reasons : Though the expansion of 5 to 7 , is not in proportion the same with the expansion from 1 to 5 , yet such a proportion need not , nor indeed is possible in this case ; for as the Body of the Air in the Glass , is above 20 times the quantity of the Body of the Air in the Pump , so such an expansion serves its turn , as may make good the space that is left by the evacuated water , which being no more but one quart , the Air in the Glass can receive no greater amplitude of expansion than one quart of space more than it had before . The measure of the extension of the Air not being governed by the bare proportion which happens in another distinct portion of Air , and that of a less dimension : But by the room or space that is left by its next contiguous Body that must be supplied by its expansion . In the 45th Remark , that which was before wanting , seems now to be supplied , viz. The method which the Hylostatical Spirit useth in raising the Water in this and in other Pumps , viz. by a circular pressure and gravitation of the Air and Water incumbent upon the Superficies of the Water that the bottom of the Pump is on , which jointly gravitates upwards , in regard of that subtil Element in the top of the Tube , that there may be no bare subtil Matter in the Pump ; which gravitation and circulation is carried on by the Hylostatical Principle , that there may be no misplacing of the Elements of the Universe , whereof the Materia Subtilis is one . This is the Solution in substance , and very near the words of the Learned Author . This Solution , in my understanding , is not only wonderful inevident , but also very improper . 1. Here is granted an occasional Elasticity of the Air and of the Water also , though supposed to be effected by the Spirit of Nature or Principium Hylarchicum ; which Elasticity I had thought the Author would not have granted to Air , much less to Water . 2. But the Supposition of this Circulation encounters it self : For either the Materia Subtilis ( which is supposed subtil enough to pervade the Glass , though the crasser parts of the Air cannot ) is either a distinct Element of it self , not incorporated with the Air , but of a distinct consistence ; or else is part of the aery concretion of the Air , the subtil part thereof , and mingled with the Air as one constituent part thereof , though in some cases severable from it ; which way soever we take it , the difficulties of the Authors Supposition are unanswerable . It is plain , the Air in the upper part of the Glass , upon the exsuction of a quart of Water , takes up a quart more of room or space than it had before : If this be caused by the perforation of the Glass by the Materia Subtilis , as a distinct Element , and so uniting it self to the Air in the Glass , then this Materia Subtilis ( which in respect of its purity , must needs have its proper place rather above the place of the Air , by the Laws of Nature , and not below it ) is called down by the Spirit of Nature , from its proper position into the cavity of the Glass , and so the natural Order , Position and Taxis of the parts of the Universe disordered and discomposed . Again , if the Materia Subtilis be but a constituent part of the Air , then is the fas ; ter external Air robbed of part of its constitution , and impoverished of what naturally belongs to it , to supply the space in the Glass derelicted by the exhausted Water , and that portion of Air in the Glass furnished with a greater portion of the Materia Subtilis , then belongs to it ; and all this done by the Spirit of Nature , which is supposed to be an active plastick principle to conserve the order of the Universe , and not to disorder it ; which according to the Learned Authors supposition , must yet be the necessary consequence of this imaginary transposition of the Materia Subtilis in this Circulation . 3. Again , in this Circulation and circular pressure , we shall find the Chain broken , and the Circulation interrupted , or a worse inconvenience ; the Air in the Glass moves upon the Water , and that again presseth upward , and moves upon the subtilized Air in the Pump , and then it is thrown out in the open external Air , and so moves upon that : It remains therefore , for the compleating of the Circle , that now at last by ther interposition of the Hylostatical Principle , the external Air must circulate by a pressure upon the Air in the upper part of the Glass , and so the Dance is finished . But 1. We must note that even the Author himself agrees that the grosser parts of the Air cannot pervade the Glass , but it must be the Materia Subtilis . I demand therefore , whether this Materia Subtilis pervades the Glass , and is united to the Air in the top of the Glass or not ? If it do not , surely the Circle is broken , and with it , the circular pressure or gravitation . If it do pervade the Glass , and be united to the Air included in the Bottle , these insuperable difficulties ensue . 1. The Hylostatical Spirit , whose Office it seems is to keep the Universe in its due Libration , and to preserve the Air it self in its just size and consistency of gross and subtil Matter , as is above observed ; breaks that order that it is placed there to conserve ; for it takes too great a proportion of subtil Matter from the common external Air which is due to it , and crowds it into the Air in the top of the Glass , which hath already more , or at least , as much as belongs to it . 2. It would follow that by such a Current of subtil Matter through the Pores of the Glass , that the Water should rise into the Pump even to the last drop ; for here is a perpetual spring and supply of subtil Matter , strained every where through the Glass into the Air or aery space that was in the head of the Glass , and no fear of any Vacuum to ensue by the passing away of the Water ; so that it may ( to use the Authors word ) as glibly pass to the last drop , as at the first , which is evidently contrary to experience . This Circular Gravitation therefore is but a supplemental Invention , to help the Flaws that arise from the Hypothesis of the Interposition of the Hylarchical Principle , as the true cause of this Phaenomenon . REMARK XLVII . I Shall not need say any thing upon this Remark ; for herein we are very much agreed ; and he useth me and my Book with much Civility , and is pleased to contribute his own Learned Observations in favour of it . THE CONCLUSION . I Shall not spend many words touching the Conclusion . In some things therein mentioned , we very well agree ; namely , in the exclusion of that prodigious Gravity and Elasticity of the Air , whereunto the late Philosophers attribute the Solution not only of the Torricellian Experiment , but many other Phaenomena . In some things we differ ; he from me , in my Solution of many of the Phaenomena mentioned in my Pamplets , by Rarefaction , Condensation and Attraction . I differ also from him , and the state of that difference I set down shortly thus , both in the Negative , and in the Affirmative . 1. I do not deny , but do really assure my self , there are created Spirits , some simply void of all corporeal or physical matter ; others , that though possibly they may have a material or physical Hypostasis or Substratum ; yet it is so subtil , that it may deserve the name of a spiritual being in common expression . 2. I do not conclude it impossible in Nature , but that there may be such a kind of common Spirit of Nature as the Author would have , and not much unlike to Helmonts Archeus , which he puts into a middle Office between the Soul and Body , or the Colcoda of Avicen . 3. But yet I do say I am not satisfied that there is sufficient evidence clearly to evince the same ; & the rather , because I see no necessity for such a being , in as much as Almighty God and his intimate presence with all his Works , and the Laws that he hath alligated to the natures of things , abundantly supply all the general Offices for the common good and order of the Universe , deputed to this Spirit of Nature : And the particular active Forms or Principles of Life or Motion , placed by the God of Nature in the several Ranks of Beings , supplies what is necessary for their particular motions , operations and instincts . 4. That the existence of a Spirit of Nature is not at all proved by those Motions and Effects in Nature , that are either purely mechanical , or that have any other immediate cause of greater , or but as great probability as such an unseen Spirit of Nature . 5. That consequently the rising of a Rundle in the Water , or the suspension of a weight in the Embolus of an Air-Pump , the Phaenomena in the Torricellian Experiment , or in the Magdeburgh Hemispheres , or in Pumps or Siphons , are non only invalid Arguments to prove such an Hylarchical Spirit , but very improper and disadvantageous to the Supposition it self . 6. But if there be any such Hylarchical Spirit , the proofs thereof should be made from such things as seem to have in themselves the Principles of their own motions , or at least , no other visible or probable immediate external cause of such their motions . 7. That if there be such an Hylarchical Principle as is contended for , and that he doth interpose in many things that are not Automata , yet it is most reasonable to suppose that the most exquisite methods of Mechanism are the most probable Media whereby it performeth such operations . 8. That therefore the Author of the Remarks should not be too much averse to the Mechanism of those Motions in Nature , as purely inconsistent with his Hylarchical Hypothesis ; for hereby he renders it less credible , by denying things that are evident to Sense , and transposing them beyond credibility , lest they should seem to prejudice his Supposition of an Hylarchical Principle . It is too much the fashion of men engaged in Suppositions , to run into extreams , and that even in this Instance of Mechanism and Mechanical Motions in Natural Bodies ; as I have shewed in the second preliminary Chapter of this Book ; some attributing too much to the Mechanism of things in Nature , and some too little . And it seems to me that the Learned Author of these Remarks , out of the zeal he hath for the asserting of a most certain Truth , namely , the existence of incorporeal Spirits , hath gone farther than was either fit or needful , in the attribution of these Phaenomena in Nature , whereof we have been debating , to the immediate operation of an incorporeal vital Spirit ; which he calls the Spirit of Nature ; which yet are reasonably salved by the Mechanism of Bodies , and the most wise Order , Institution and Laws setled by the great Creator of all things , which Laws are called the Laws of Nature . FINIS . Books printed for , and to be sold by William Shrowsbury , at the Sign of the Bible in Duck-lane . AN Essay touching the Gravitation or Non-Gravitation of Fluid Bodies , and the reasons thereof ; in 8. Stereometric , or the Art of Practical Gauging ; shewing in two Parts , 1. Diverse facile and compendious ways for Gauging of ●uns and Brewers Vessels , of all Forms and Figures , either in whole , or gradually from Inch to Inch , whether the Tun or Vessels Bases above and below be Homogeneal , or Heterogeneal , parallel , and alike situate or not . 2. The Gauging of any Wine , Brandy , or Oyl-Cask ; be the same assum'd as Sphaeroidal , Parabolical , Conical , or Cylindrical , either full , or partly empty , and at any position of the Cask , or Altitude of contained Liquor ; performed either by brief Calculation , or Instrumental Operation . Together with , a Large Table of Area's of a Circles Segments , and other necessary Tables , and their excellent Utilities and Improvements ; with a copious and methodical Index of the whole ; rendring the Work perspicuous and intelligible to Mean Capacities . By John Smith , Philo-Accomptant : in 8. Franconis Burgersdicii Idaea Philosophiae Naturalis , sive Methodus Definitionum & Controversiarum Physicarum . Editio Novissima . Huc accessit Idea Oeconomicae & Politicae Doctrinae , Eodem Auctore . Opus Posthumum . 12. De Antiqua Ecclesiae Britannicae Libertate , atque de legitima ejusdem Ecclesiae exemptione à Romano Patriarchatu Diatribe per aliquot Theses diducta : Autore I. B. S S. Theol. Professore . 4. Contemplations Moral and Divine , First and Second Part ; in 8. Spadacrene Dunelmensis ; Or , A short Treatise of an ancient Medicinal Fountaln , or Vitrioline Spaw near the City of Durham . Together with the Constituent Principles , Virtues and Uses thereof . By E. W. Doctor in Physick .