X OSS' :’V» - I ;&i J ENCrCLOPJEDIA BRITANNICA; D I C T I 6 NARY OF ARTS, SCIENCES, AND MISCELLANEOUS LITERATURE^ Conftrufted on a Plan, BY WHICH THE DIFFERENT SCIENCES AND ARTS Are digefted into the Form of Diftindt TREATISES or SYSTEMS, COMPRKUB NDINO The History, Theory, and Practice, of each, according to the Lateft Dii'coveries and Improvements; and full EXPLANATIONS given of the VARIOUS DETACHED PARTS OF KNOWLEDGE, WHETHER RELATING TO Natural and Artificial Objedts, or to Matters Ecclesiastical, Civil, Military, Commercial, &c. Including Elucidations of the molt important Topics relative to Religion, Morals, Manners, and the Oeconomy of Life : A Description of all the Countries, Cities, principal Mountains, Seas, Rivers, drc. throughout the World* A General History, dncient and Modirriy of the different Empires, Kingdoms, and States* AND An Account of the Lives of the mod Eminent Perfons in every Nation, from the earlieft ages down to the prefent times. Computed frem the-writings of the btji Authors, in fe-vera! languages ; the maft approved Diaionaries, as well of general feienee as of its parti¬ cular branches ; the Tranfaeiicm, foutnuls, and Memoirs, of Learned Societies, both at home and abroad\ the AIS. Leaures of Eminent Profejfors on different jcunces ; and a variety of Original Materials, furnijhed by an Extenftve Correfpondence. THE THIRD EDITION, IN EIGHTEEN VOLUMES, GREATLY IMPROVED, ILLUSTRATED WITH FIVE HUNDRED AND FORTY-TWO COPPERPLATES. VOL. XL 1NDOCTI DlSCjtNT, ST si M E N T MKMItflSSE PBRITI. EDINBURGH. PRINTED FOR A. BELL AND C. MACFARI^UHAR* MDCCXCVII, Cntereu in stationers! ^atl in eermsi of ttje of Jparttament Encyclopedia Britannica, MED ''Utility of -jl /rEDAL, denotes a piece of metal in^the form them J_Vx of coin, fuch as was either current money ^ 01 yJ c‘ among the ancients, or flrtick on any particular occa- fion, in order to preferve to pofterity the portrait of fome great perfon, or the memory of fome illuftrious action. Scaliger derives the word medal from the Ara¬ bic methalia ; a fort of coin with a human head upon it. But the opinion of Vofiius is generally received; viz. that it comes from metadum, “ metalof which fubftance medals are commonly made. Sect. I. Utility of Medals in Hijlory, and various other Sciences. There are few ftudies of more importance to hif- tory than that of medals ; the foie evidence we can have of the veracity of an hiftorian being only fuch collateral documents as are evident to every body, and cannot be falfified. In modern times, thefe are found in public memoirs, inflruttions to ambafladors, and flate papers of various kinds. Such memorials, how¬ ever, are fubjeft to various accidents, and belides com¬ monly remain in the countries where they are firft publifhed, and cannot therefore give to the world at large that perfect and.entire fatisfa&ion which ought to be derived from genuine hiftory; fo that more durable and widely diffufed monuments are dill to be wilhed for. Such are public buildings, infcrip- tions, and datues ; but thefe, excepting a few indances of the two lad, are always confined to particular countries; fo that medals alone remain as infallible documents of truth, capable of being diffufed over all countries in the world, and of remaining through the lated ages. Various The fird who Ihowed the importance of medals *in writers on afcertaining the dates, and arranging the order of medals. events, in ancient hidory, by means of medals, was Vaillant, in his Hidory of tie Kings of Syria, printed at Paris in 1681. By medals alone, he has been enabled to fix the chronology and important events of hidory, in the three mod ancient kingdoms of the world, viz. Egypt, Syria, and Parthia. Many coins have been difeovered fincC his time, which con¬ firm the accounts he has given. He was followed in this method by Father Hardouin, though with lefs 'fuccefs. Hardouin’s bed work is his Nerodiades, or Series of Succeffors to Herod king of Judrea. The fame plan was purfued by Noris, in.his learned Trea- tife on the Syro-Macedonian princes, and by Bayer •iV0L. XI. Part K A L S. in his Hiftory of Ofrhoene, as well as by Froelich, in Guilty of the work intitled Annales Regum et Rerum Vien. 1754, and another named Kevenhullers Regum ’ ■ ‘f veterum Numifmdta Anecdota aucl Ferrara, "ien. 1752, 4to, of which Froelich was properly the author. Cor- fini and Cary likewife publilhed works of a fimilar na¬ ture ; the former in 1744, Ue Minnifari, aliorumque Armenia Regum, Nummis, See. 5 the latter in 1752, Hijloire des Rais de Thrace, et du Bofphore Cimmerien, eclaircie par les Medal lies. ■ 4 The ftudy of the Greek coins does not diow the Of the dates of events, though it tlluftrates the chronology Greek of reigns. This defect, however, is abundantly fup-coins* plied by thofe of Rome, which commonly mark the date of the prince’s confulfhip, the year of his tri- bunician power; giving alfo, upon the reverfe, the re- prefentation or poetical fymbol of fome grand event. The year of the tribunician power is fometimes ima¬ gined by antiquaries to he fynonymous with that of the emperor’s reign: but this is not the cafe; and Mr Pinkerton is at fome pains to fet them right ifl this refpeft. He finds fault with Julius Caefar, when he affumed the fovereign authority, for taking upon him the title of Perpetual Diftator, af-being fynony¬ mous with that of king or abfolute governor, which the Romans abhorred. “ He ought (fays our author), under the difguife of fome fupreme magiftratc of an¬ nual ele&ion, to have lulled the people with a dream, that they might terminate his power when they pleafed; or that he himfelf would refign it, when the necefiities of ftate which had required his temporary elevation had fubiided.” To this error Mr Pinkerton aferibes .. 3. the affaflination of the Di&ator,' and commends the policy of Auguftus, who, with far inferior abilities, Au'uftus continued in poffeffion of the moft abfolute authority to fecure as long as he lived. The tribunelhip was an office ofhls P0,Wer> annual eleftion.; and if put into the hands of any others than plebeians, muft have been the fupreme power of the Hate, as it belonged to that office to put a negative upon every public meafure whatever. Au- guftus, being of feriatorial rank, could not affume this office ; but he invefted himfelf with the tribunichn power, which had the advantages of appearing to be only a temporary fupremacy, though in truth it was continued during his whole lifetime. Towards the end of his reign, he frequently affumed his deftined fucceffor, Tiberius, for his colleague, though in the beginning he had enjoyed it alone. This, with his artifice of refigning his power every ten years, and A re-affuming 2 MED Utility of re-affuming it at the defire, as was pretended, of the tftor'-in&ci fenate> fecured his fovereignty as long as he lived.— f His example was followed by his fucceflbrs ; fo that mod of them have the infeription ¥ribunicia Potejlate upon their medals, with the date affixed to it thus, TV. Pot. Vll. Yet though this date generally im¬ plies the year of the emperor’s reign, it fometimes happens that the emperor, by fpecial favour from a for¬ mer prince, had been endowed with this title before he came to the throne, as being the fucceffor to that prince, of which we have already given an inftance in Tiberius. Befides the tribunician power, the empe¬ rors very frequently enjoyed that of the confuls; and the date of their confulffiip is frequently expreffed in their coins. The office of Pontifex Maximus was likewife af- fumed by the Roman emperors in order to fecure them- felves in their authority ; which, Mr Pinkerton ob- ferves, was one of the moft efficacious artifices they could have fallen upon. “ In the Greek heroic times (fays he), king and prieft were carefully united in one perfon ; and when fovereigns arofe in Denmark and Sweden, the fame plan was followed, as appears from Snorro, and other writers. Nothing could lend more fecurity to the perfon of the monarch than an office of fupreme fanftity, which alfo confirmed his power by all the terrors of fuperftition. Even the Chriftian fyftem was afterwards debafed by a mock alliance with government ; though it be clear from the whole New Tefiament, that fuch an alliance is fubverfive of its genuine inftitution, and the great;eft of all its corrup¬ tions. But the Roman Catholic clergy, in the dark ages, were the authors of ‘ no church no king,’ for their own intereft ; while the Roman emperors only fought to ftrengthen their power by the dark awe of fuperftition. The title of Pontifex Maximus was fo important, that'it was retained even by the Chriftian emperors till the time of Gratian. Its influence in the ftate’was, indeed, prodigious. Cicero obferves, that to this office were fubjeft temples, altars, penates, gods, houfes, wealth, and fortune of the people.— That of augur is alfo borne by many emperors; and its authority was fuch, that by the law of the twelve tables no public bufinefs could be tranfafted without a declaration from the augur concerning its event.— The pro-confular power was alfo given to Auguftus and the other emperors. It conferred a direft autho¬ rity over all the provinces, and implied the emperor to be chief pro-conful, or governor of each, and of all. Another fpecial power affigned to the emperors, but not occurring on coins, was the Jus Relationis Tertia, 2>uartte, &c. or the right of making three or four mo¬ tions in the fenate on the fame day, while the fena- tors could only propofe one. Hence our author infers, that medals afford the moft authentic documents of the Roman hiftory, in particular, that could have been invented by man.— The hiftories of Nerva and Trajan are much-better elucidated by medals than by authors; for the hiftory of Suetonius ends with Domitian, and the Hifloria Juguja Scriptores begins with Adrian: fo that the reigns of the two emperors juft mentioned are almoft tinknown ; and Mr Pinkerton is furprifed that none of the learned have attempted to fupply the defeS. a l s. Sea. r, “ Capitolinus (fays he), in his life of Maximinus Ju- Utility 0f nior, is quite puzzled to know if Maximus and Pu- t|lem • ^ ^ ^ c r ftory. &c. pienus were two emperors, or two names for the fame. J f Had he happened on any of thofe coins which bear -M. Cl. Pupienus Maximus Aug. he would have feen at once that Maximus was only another name for Pupienus.” 4 Medals are ufeful in other fciences befides Mftory. Ufe of me- In geography, we find the fituation of towns de-dals *n geo“ tennined by their vicinity to fome poted river, moun-srap • tain, &c. Thus, MArxin nM xiutao r {hows that Magnefia was fituated under Mount Sipylus. In like manner, it is drown from-a medal, that Ephefus !1 ood on the river Cayfter; and there is extant a medal, bear¬ ing an infeription, which fignifies Alexandria on the Scamander ; a name given to Troy by Alexander the Great. The reverfe has upon it the famous Apollo Smintheus of Homer. In natural hiftory, alfo, medals jn na^uraj i are ufeful chiefly from the coins ftruck on the celubra- hiftory. tion of the fecular games, in which the figures of various animals are preferved ; and thus it may very often be determined whether any animal be known to the ancients or not. On many of the Greek medals are feveral uncommon plants and animals. Thus, on moil of the medals of Cyrene is the figure of the ce¬ lebrated Syiphlum ; and on thofe of Tyre, the fhell-fifti from which the famous Tyrian purple was procured. 6 By means of medals, alfo, the exa& delineations of tn architect many noble edifices are preferved, though not even a ture. veftige of their ruins be now exifting; fo that the ufes of them to the architedft are very confiderable. To (n ^ gn{. the connoiffeur they are abfolutely neceffary ; becaufe arts, by them alone he is enabled to aferibe ancient bulls and (latues to their proper perfons, with multitudes of other points of knowledge which cannot be othtr- wife determined. The elucidations of obfeure paf- fages in ancient authors by means of medals are fo numerous and well known, that it is needlefs to infill upon them. Mr Addifon has treated the connexion betwixt me¬ dals and poetry at confiderable length; but Mr Pin¬ kerton finds fault with him for preferring the Latin to the Greek poets. He obferves alfo, that the know¬ ledge of Greek medals is moft neceffary for a fculp- g tor, and perhaps an architeft ; but an acquaintance Latin me- with Latin ones is preferable for a poet, or perhaps a da^s of ufe painter. The reafon of this difference is, that thetoaPoet* former generally have on the obverfe the head of fome king, god, or goddefs, of exquifite relief and work- manftn'p ; but the reverfe feldom affords much fancy of lymbol in the early Greek coins; and in the impe¬ rial Greek coins, is chiefly impreffed with the temples of their deities. To a perfon of poeKcal imagination, however, the Roman coins afford the greatell enter¬ tainment, from the*fine perfonifications and fymbols to be found on their reverfes; of which our author gives the following inftances: ~ ^ “Happiness has fometimes the caduceus, or wandPerfonifica- of Mercury, which,Cicero, i. Offic. tells us was thought,tlonsonRe” to procure every wifh. She has in a gold coin of ye.man verus heads of poppy, to exprefs that our prime blefs lies in oblivion of misfortune. “ Hope is reprefented as a fprightly girl, walking quickly, and looking, ftraight forward. With her left * hand. Sea. IL MEDALS. 3 Utility of hand die holds up her garments, that they may not im- tftem ’ Pe^e t^ie rapidity of her pace ; while in her right hand . uryJ c' fhe holds forth the bud of a flower; an emblem infi- *■- nitely more fine than the trite one of an anchor, which is the fymbol of Patience and not of Hope. This perfonification, with fome others, mull have been very familiar to the ancients ; for often in this, and in a few more inllances, no name, as Spes Aug. or the like, is inferted in the legend. “ Abundance is imagined as a fedate matron, with a cornucopia in her hands, of which Ihe fcatters the fruits, and does not hold up her cornucopia and keep the contents to. herfelf, as' many modern poets and painters make her do. “ The Emperor Titus, having caufe to import a great fupply of corn during a fcarcity at Rome, that fupply, or the Annona, is finely reprefented as a fe¬ date lady, with filled cornucopia in her left hand, which flie holds upright, to indicate that Ihe does not, however, mean to fcatter it, as Abundance has a title to do, but to give it to Equity to deal out. This lafl: particular is fhown by her holding a little image of Equity, known by her fcales and hajln pura, or point- lefs fpear, in her right hand, over a balket filled with wheat. Behind the Annona is the prow of a fhip decked with flowers, to imply that the corn was brought by fea (from Africa), and that-the fhips had had a profperous voyage. The bell poet in the world would not have given us a finer train of imagery ; the bell painter would have been puzzled to exprefs fo much matter in fo fmall a compafs. “ Security Hands leaning upon a pillar, indica¬ tive of her being free from all defigns and purfuits ; and the pofture itfelf correfponds to her name. Ho¬ race, in defcribing the wife man, mentions his being teres atque rotundas ; round and poliflied, againll all the rules of chance : an idea feemingly derived from the column upon which this ideal lady reclines. “ The emblems of Piety, Modesty, and the like, are equally appofite and poetical. “ The happinefs of the Hate is pidlured by a Ihip failing before a profperous breeze : an image than which the fuperlative genius of Gray could find none more exquifite ; and he has accordingly ufed it in his moll capital production “ The Bard,” with due fuc- cefs. “ The different countries of the then known world are alfo delineated with great poetical imagery. It affords patriotic fatisfaftion-in particular to a Briton, to fee his native illand often reprefented upon the ear- ( hell imperial coins fitting on a globe, with a fymbol of military power, the labarum in her hand, and the ocean rolling under her feet. An emblem almoft prophetic of the vail power which her dominion over the fea will always give her, provided Ihe exerts her element of empire with due vigour and perfeverance. “ Coins alfo prefent us with Achaia, Africa, Ala- mannia, Alexandria, Arabia, Armenia, Alia, Bithy- nia, Cappadocia, Dacia, Dardania, Egypt, Gallia, • Hifpania, Italia, Judasa, Macedon, Mauritania, Pan- nonia, Parthia, Phrygia, Sarmatia, Sicily, Scythia, Syria, and the rivers Danube, Nile, Rhine, Tyber. This perfonification of provinces feems to have arifen from the figures of provinces carried in triumphs ; as the perfonification of our old poets fprung from the ideal perfons aClually repvefented in the myllenal Utility of pJays. _ _ _ “ There is one colonial medal of rude execution of Augullus and Agrippa, which has an high claim to merit in difplaying the ancient poetical imagery. It is infcribed Imp. and Divi. f. and on the reverfe, the conqueft of Egypt is reprefented by the metaphor of a crocodile, an animal almoll peculiar to that country, and at that period elleemed altogether fo; which is chained to a palm-tree, at once a native of the coun¬ try, and fymbolic of vidtory. ro “ As the n?verfes are fo ufeful for knowledge of vTedals ufc> perfonification, fymbols of countries and adlions, and ful to a the like ; fo the portraits to be feen on old coins ard Painter. no lefs important to a painter; the high merit of A great number of them, in every charadler,juitly intitling them to be regarded as the bell lludies in the world. Not to mention, that, to an hilloric painter, the fei- ence of ancient medals is abfolutely neceffary, that he may delineate his perfonages with the features they really bore while in exillence. This can only be at¬ tained in this way, or from llatues and bulls; any one of which will colt as much as hundreds of medals j and indeed a colledtion of fuch is only attainable by princes.” The fame things which render the Itudy of medals p0 arfcu]p; important to a painter, do Hill more fo to a fculptor;tor. and in this particular, the Hudy of the Greek coins is remarkably ufeful. The Ikill of the Greeks in the art of fculpture has always been admired throughout the world ; and on their coins the heads of feveral dei¬ ties are reprefented in the mofl exquifite alto-relievo. Our author therefore thinks it Hrange, that the Gre¬ cian coins Ihould have hitherto been fo little attended to by men of learning and tafle. They may have been looked upon, he fuppofes, as belonging only to the province of the antiquary ; but he affures us, that the Greek medals will afford fatisfaction to the perfons wdio value them only as pieces of work- manlhip. In moH refpedls, they" greatly excel thofe of Rome even in its bell times ; which our author fup¬ pofes to have been from the days of AuguHus to A-, drian. “ In the days of Adrian, in particular (fays he), the Roman mint feems to have been the very feat of art and genius; vvitnefs the yafi number of ex¬ quifite perfonifications, engraven with equal work¬ man fli ip, which fwarm on the medals of that prince. Yet from his time down to Poflhumus, coins of admi¬ rable workmanfliip are to be found. Thofe of the FauHinas and Lucilla deferve particular mention. There is one, and not an uncommon one, of the latter in great brafs, which yields to nothing of the kind. The reverfe is a Venus with the name around her. The portrait of the obverfe feems to fpring from the field of the coin ; it looks and breathes, nay talks, if you truff your eyes. The coins of Tarfus are ex¬ tremely remarkable for a kind of perfpedlive in the figures, as Froelich obferves. On others are found triumphal arches, temples, fountains, aquedudls, am¬ phitheatres, circi, hippodromes, palaces, bafilicas, co¬ lumns and obeliiks, baths, fea-ports, pharofes,, and the like. Thefe furnifh much pleafure and infiruftion to the architedl, and ferve to form his taHe to the ancient manner ; that manner which unites perfedl fimplicity with fublimity and grace ; that manner which every A 2 age Difference betwixt a medalHft and anti- ■quary. MEDALS. SeailL. age adpilres, iii proportion as it has genius to imi- moft important to their country, but leave its anti- Hiftory. tate.” quities to chance. Every thing is important but our hiftoiy ; and. we are profound in. every ancient matter Sect. IL Entertainment arlf.ngfrom the Study that is fuperficial; and fuperficial in what is profound.. cf Medals. Even England cannot boail of one general hiltorian, but trufts to the inaccuracy of Rapin,. and the igno- Besides the purpofes which the ftudy of medals rant neatnefs of: Hume. It is therefore no wonder anfwers in the ufeful arts, a great variety of fources of that, the ftudy of antiquity is here ridiculous, though, entertainment are to be found in it. Mr Pinkerton moft important in other countries; none requiring cbfervesj that the moft barbarous nations are more greater talents, learning, or induftry. But the hifto- pleafed with the rudeft efforts of art, than with the ric antiquary has the pleafure of benefiting fociety, , mqftr admirable works of nature ; and that m proper- and enlightening-whole nations, while the medallic has tion as the powers of the mind are large and various, only an innocent amufement. This amufement, con* Inch are alfo the pleafures which it receives from thofe fidered merely as riling from antiquarian objeas, has iaperlative produaions of art, which can only be the not been explained,.though.felt.by moil people, and offspring of vaft genius. Hence works of art are more by the learned. It- feems analogical with that agreeable both to the enlightened and to the ignorant, which- we derive from an extenfive profpea : for as The chief amufement, therefore, which attends, the the mind delights to expand itfelf into diftant places, ftudy of medals,, originates from the ftrength and fpi- fo alfo into diftant. times. We.connect ourfelves with rit, the finifli and beauty, which the engraver has dif- thefe times, and feel as it were a double exijtence. The played in the execution of them.. It belides gives a paffions are Angularly affe&ed by.minutepircumllances, kind of perfonal acquaintance with the perfons of whom though mute to generalities ; and the relids of anti- they are the reprefentations. Portraits have always quity imprefs us more than its general hiftory.” been highly entertaining'to mankind ; and our author is of opinion, that the love of them gave rife both to Sect III. Hijlory,of Medals. painting and fculpture. They are no where to be found fo ancient, numerous, and fo well preferved as The ftudy of medals is not of very ancient date; in medals. Amufement is alfo derived even from the None of the claflic writers give any account of collec- reprefentations of ideal heads and perfons; nay, .even tions of them ; though indeed many little particulars from the minuteft fymbols. Thus the Greek coins of are paffed without notice by them. In the times cities prefent us with heads of deities of exquifite °f the Greeks, a colle&ion • of fuch Coins, as. then workmanfhip, apparently copied from ftatues or paint- exifted muft have been but little regarded, as confift- Jiigs; fo that we may even guefs at the works of A- log onIy °f thofe ftruck by the numerous little nates pelles and Praxiteles from fome of the Greek medals, which at that time ufed the Greek chara&ers and lan» Their reverfes afford ftill greater variety ; there being guage. Hence they would have had an air of fcarce an objeft either in art or nature which is not domeftic coinage, and no attention would have been reprefented upon fome of them : and to the fatisfac- paid to them, however exquifite their workmandxip tion arifrng from a view of thefe, we may likewife add might have.been. The little intercourfe at that time that of beholding, in a-lively manner, the dreffes, man - carried on betwixt the different provinces alfo, greatly ners and cuftoms, religious and civil ceremonies, of impeded any communication of knowledge to thofe the. ancients: fa that: from medals we may obtain an. who wrote hiftories; fo that it is no wonder to find inteiefting hiftory of manners which, though very any fmall collections that might then have exifted al- lately cultivated, may perhaps afford the moft ufeful together unnoticed by them. and entertaining of all the provinces of hiftory. Almoft as foon as any communication was opened Greekcoins- There is a very-confiderable difference betwixt the between the Greeks and Romans, the latter treated imitated ky- ftudy of medals and that of a mere antiquary. The. the arts of the Greeks with all due refpeft and ap-!ilc Ro- latter frequently feems to take delight in coins mere- plaafe. Their coins were imitated by the Romans, mans‘ ly in proportion to their ruft and deformity.; fo that: and preferved in cabinets by tbe fenators among their it is often a recommendation of fome of their pieces, choiceft treafures. Suetonius informs us, that on fo- that neither portrait, reverfe, nor legend, can be dif- lemn occafions Auguftus was accuftomed to prefent covered ; at. leaft in fuch manner as can be intelligibly his friends with medals of foreign Rates and princes, explained. “ The delight of the antiquarift (fays Mr along with other valuable teftimonies of Ins friendftnp. Pinkerton) may be called a depraved appetite of the In a more advanced period of the Roman empire, mind, which feeds on tralh, and fills itfelf with empti- however, individuals would undoubtedly form collec- nefs. It is perhaps a mere childilh curiofity mingled tions of coins peculiar to their own llate ; for Dr with caprice and hypochondricifm. Again ft this cha- S.tukeley, in. Ids MedaUic Hiftory of Caranfius, in-, rafter the ridicule of Severus is;particularly Ihot, but forms us, that a complete feries- of filver coins was with little effeft ; for our antiqu'ifts exceed in vilions lately found in Britain, containing all, the emperors and nonfenfe. I fay nntlqutjls ; for the name of anti- down to Caraufius inclufively. From Banduri we quary is facred. ~£>y antiquary, in foreign countries, alfo know, that; certain. Greek coins were fpecially is implied a man who illuftrates their ancient laws, pveferved by the Romans ; and it appears from their : manners, poetry, but efpecially their ancient.hiftory. code, that ancient gold and filver coins were made ufe There, men of the raoft elevated minds are antiquaries;. of inftead of gems; to which diftinftion thofe of Sicily as Muratori, Leibnitz, Montefquteu, Du Bos. Here were particularly intitled. From the decline of the men of takots will not ftoop, forfooth, to ftudies the Roman empire till towards the end of the 5th centa- *7* Sea. nr. MED Hiftbry. ry, almoft all branches of literature were involved in darknefs, and the medallic fcience among the reft. While the Chriftian dominion of Conftantinople lafted, indeed, almoft all the arts and fciences may be faid to have been kept within its own boundaries} though the Arabs and eaftern nations had fome arts and fci¬ ences of their own : but after the deftru&ion of the imperial city by the Turks, the Greeks were once more compelled to become fathers to the European Science. Even before this time, indeed, fome veftiges of a revival of literature had appeared in Italy; “and fo intimate and neceffary a connexion (fays Mr Pin¬ kerton) has now the ftudy of medals-with that of an¬ cient erudition, that on the earlieft appearance of a revival of the latter, the former was alfo difclofed.” <&>Ue Mr Wren> Mr Chlcheley, and Mr Kemp. At prefent there are many remarkable colleftions; but that of the late Dr Hunter is defervedly elleemed the mo ft remarkable in Europe, excepting that of the French king. It was not only formed at a great ex¬ pence, but with much care and ability ; many foreign ' medals offered to it having been rejetted. The other remarkable collettions are thofe of the duke of Devon- fhire, the earl of Pembroke, earl Fitzwilliam, formerly the marquis of Rockingham’s, the honourable Horace Walpole, the reverend Mr Crachrode, the reverend Mr Southgate, Mr Townley, Mr R. P. Knight, Mr Edward Knight, Mr Tyfon, Mr Barker, Mr Brown, and feveral others. The mufeum and univerfities have alfo collettions; as well as the lawyers library, and the colleges in Scotland. Sect. IV. Materials of which Medals are con- fruftcd. tg Medals are formed of gold, filver, and the various Ancient modifications of copper. The gold ufually made ufe gold coin . of in coinage is about the finenefs of 22 carats; and as the art of purifying this metal was very much un- knowrn in former times, the moft ancient medals are for this reafon much more impure than the modern coins. Gold is never found in its native ftate above 22 carats fine; and the very ancient medals are much under that ftandard. Many of them are compofed of a mixture of gold and filver, called by the ancients eleHrum. The gold medals were made of much finer metal after Philip of Macedon became poffeffed of the gold mines of Philippi in Thrace, and the me¬ dals of his fon Alexander the Great are equally fine ; as well as thofe of fome other princes of that age. Thofe of the Egyptian Ptolemies are of the finenefs of 23 carats three grains, with only one grain of alloy. The Roman coins are very pure even from the earlieft times ; the art of refining gold being well known be¬ fore any wras coined at Rome. Some authors are of opinion, that the Roman coins begin to fall ftiort of their purity after the time of Titus; but Mr Pinker¬ ton denies that any thing of this kind takes place till the time of the Emperor Severus; and even then only in a very few inftances. Moft of the Roman gold was brought from Dalmatia and Dacia, where that •metal is ftill to be met with. A very remarkable cir- cumftance is obferved in the eaftern part of Hungary, which belonged to the ancient Dacia: It germinates in the vines of Tokay, and is found in their Items; as it is elfewhere in the ftraw of corn. Heta?call- Pliny informs us, and indeed it is generally known, thclrum. that gold and iilver are found mixed together in the earth. When the filver amounted to one-fifth part of the gold, the metal was called eleBrum but fometimes the quantity of filver was added artificially. The gold was in thofe days as well as at prefent refined by means of mercury: and the ancient artifts had certainly at¬ tained to great perfettion in this branch of metallurgy; as Bodin tells us, that the goldfmiths of Paris upon melting one of Vefpafian’s gold coins found only a0 part of alloy. Ancient fil- Moft of the ancient filver, particularly that of Greece, ,rer* is lefs pure than that of fucceeding times; even the A L S. Sea. IV. Roman filver is rather inferior to the prefent ftandard, Of what and that from the very beginning; but in the time ofconftrufted Severus, the filver appears very bad, and-continues fo * until the time of Dioclefian. Many writers upon this fubjett have miftaken the denarii arei, “ coins of brafs walked with filver,” for filver currency. Silver coins are extremely fcarce from , the time of Claudius Gothi- cus to that of Diodefian, or from the year 270 to 284; in w'hich ihort fpace no fewer than eight emperors reigned. Silver at that time was found moftly in Spain; and the commerce with that country was difturbed by the ufurpefs who arofe in Gaul: and fuch were the troubles of the times, that not only the filver, but alfo the gold coins of thofe eight emperors, are extremely fcarce. There is ftill, however, fome filver extant of thefe eight emperors; and it is certain, that copper wafhed was never ufed as filver currency, but was en¬ tirely a diftintt coinage. Occafional depravations of filver had taken place long before ; as Pliny tells us, that Mark Anthony mixed iron with his filver denarii; and Mr Pinkerton informs us, that he had feen a de¬ narius of Anthony, which was attratted by a mag¬ net. 2* The ancient brafs coins confift of two kinds : the red or Cyprian, which indeed is no other than copper; and the common yellow brafs. Our author obferves, that in the Roman coinage brafs wras of double the value of copper, and he is of opinion, that it was the fame among the Greeks; and the latter is the metal moft commonly made ufe of in the Greek coinage. The Roman feftertii are always of brafs: the middling- fized kind are partly copper and partly brafs; the for¬ mer being double th? value of the latter, which are the afes.' # Mr Pinkerton next proceeds to give an account of Mixed me- the mixed metals ufed among the Romans. In Bri- tal** tain all kinds of coins made of mixed metal are with¬ out hefitation alleged to be forgeries ; although it is certain that the variety of mixed metals ufed in coi¬ nage was very confiderable. The moft valuable mix¬ ture was that of gold or filver already mentioned, na¬ med e/eSrtf.’n; the filver commonly amounting to one- fifth part of the gold made ufe of, or perhaps more. Of this mixture are many of the early coins of Lydia, and fome other Afiatic ftates; alio thofe of the kings of the Bofporus Cimmerius, during the imperial ages 23 of Rome. Next to the elettrum were the coins of Corinthian Corinthian brafs: but Mr Pinkerton informs us, that brafs. not a fingle coin was ever ftruck of this metal by the ancients; it having been conftantly employed only in the fabrication of vafes or toys. It was in ufe at any rate only for a very ftiort time’; being altogether un¬ known in the days of Pliny the Elder. Our author therefore ridicules thofe who pretend not only to find out imperial coins of this metal, but to difeover three kinds of it; viz. one in which the gold predominates, another in which the filver prevails, and a third where the brafs is moft confpicuous. He gives zEneas Vico, one of the moft ancient writers on medals, as the au¬ thor of this idea; but whofe opinions were confuted by one Savot, a writer in the 17th century. Vico mentions a coin of this kind ftruck under uguftus, another of Livia, and a third of Claudius. The mif- take, he is of opinion, arch - from the circumftance of the firft propagator not hti-g able-to account for the various Seel. V. M E D Of what various mixtures and modifications of brafs obfervable conftru&ed jn coins of the large fize; and which in fo • * common a metal appear very odd to the moderns. Befides the authority of Pliny and other antiquaries of more modern date, who all declare that they never faw a fingle medal of Corinthian brafs, or of that metal mixed with filver and gold, our author adduces another evidence which he looks upon to be fuperior to either; viz. that thofe'who have given into this fuppofition, imagine, that the large pieces called fcjlertii, and others called dupondiarii, worth about twopence or a penny, are faid to have been compofed of this precious metal. It is unreafonable to think, that any proportion of gold or filver could have been made ufe of in thefe. The coins faid to have been ftruck upon Corinthian brafs are only done upon a modification of common brafs; of which we know, that in proportion to the quantity of zinc made ufe of in conjun&ion with the copper, the metal aflumes a variety of hues. On the ( authority of Pliny he informs us, that the coins miila- ken for Corinthian brafs were no other than prince’s metgl. The Egyptian filver coins ftruck under the Roman Egyptian emperors are at firft of tolerably pure filver; but af- £iver coins, tcrwards degenerate into a mixture of copper and tin with a little filver. They are very thick, but many of them are elegantly ftruck, with uncommon reverfes. There are likewife three fets of brafs coins belonging to this country from the earlieft times of the Roman emperors there. Some of thefe are of bell-metal or pot-metal; and after the time of Gallienus and Vale¬ rian, the coinage of brafs with a fmall addition of fil¬ ver becomes authorifed by the ftate; the coins ftrtfck upon it being called denarii arei. Tkofe of lead or copper plated with filver have been fabricated by Ro¬ man forgers. Some coins of lead, however, have been met with o.f undoubted antiquity: and an ancient wri¬ ter informs us, that tin-money was coined by Diony- fius; but none has been found. The lead coins of Tigranes king of Armenia, mentioned as genuine by Jobert, are accounted forgeries by Mr Pinkerton and other modern medallifts. Plautus, however, makes mention of leaden coins, and feveral of them have been found; but our author looks upon them to have been chiefly eftay pieces, ftruck in order to let the artift judge of the progrefs of the dye. Others are the plated kind already mentioned, fabricated by ancient forgers, but having the plating worn off. A great number of leaden coins are mentioned by Ficorini. in a work in- titled Piombi Antichi, in which he fuppofes them to have ferved as tickets for guefts; and coins of the fame kind are alfo mentioned by Pafferi. In the work xntitled Notitia Imperii Romani, there is mention of coins made of leather, but none of them have ever been found. Sect. V. Of Ancient Money. In confidering the different fizes, values, &c. of the Greek and Roman coins, our author treats of the me¬ dals as money ; a knowledge of which, he fays, is ef- fentially neceffary to every reader of the claflics; info- much that it may almoft difpute the preference with the ftudiesof ancient geography and chronology. Not- withftanding all that, has been written upon the fub- A L S. 7 je&, however, our author is of opinion, that the fcrence Ancient is ftill in its infancy, in as far as it relates'to the real, °"ey , money of the ancients. “ The ideal (fays he), which is indeed the molt important province of difeuffion, Knowledge has been pretty clearly afeertained; and we are almoft ancient as well acquainted with the Attic mna or rnina, and the perplexing progress of the Roman fferl'w, as with 1 our oven pounds. But with the aftual coin of the an¬ cients the cafe is different; and the ignorance even of the learned in this point is wonderful.” Our author now goes on, with great afperity of language, to particularife the ignorant manner in which modern authors have treated the fubjedl of medals. “ Arbuthnot and Clarke (fays he) are if poflible more ignorant of medals than Budseua the very firft. The latter profeffes his love of medals, but quotes a con- fular coin wuth the head of Cicero; and looks upon one of the 30 pieces of filver, the reward of the treach¬ ery of Judas, and which was faid to be preferved a- mong fome relidts at Paris, to be worthy of reference- and commemoration. Arbuthnot, if we may judge from his book, had never feen any ancient coins; and Clarke, it is well known, was quite ignorant of them. The latter, with all his labour, feems even to have known nothing of the theoretic part of the real ancient money. Indeed Dr Mead’s catalogue feems to have been almoft the only booh on medals which had under gone his perufal. On the other hand, the ignorance of medallifts on , this fcore is no lefs profound. To this day they look upon the didrachms of iEgina, fo celebrated in antiquity, as tridrachms of vEgium; and upon the early obolus as a brafs coin. In the Roman clafs the large brafs is efteemed the as, while it fhall be proved that it is the fefertius, and worth four afes. The denarius is reckoned at ten afes even in the impe¬ rial times ; whereas it only went at that rate for the firft 90 years after the coinage of filver at Rome. The denarius sereus is taken for filver currency; with other miftakes which evince that medallifts are as ig¬ norant of the theory as the-others are of the prac- tIce ” . . *6 In his account of the ancient. Greek money, Mr Money firflfc Pinkerton obferves, that the light of fcience, like that coined in of the fun, has proceeded from eaft to weft. “ It is t^e ea^* moft probable fays he), that the firft invention of money arofe like the other arts and fciences; and fpread from thence into the weftern parts of the world: » In its firft lhape it appeared as mere pieces of metal Its firft without any ftated form or impreffion;, in lieu ofrudcftate^ which, it was regulated by weight. Even down to the Saxon government in England, large fums were regulated by weight; and in our own times every fingle piece is weighed in gold; though with regard to filver this nicety is not minded, nor indeed does it feem pra&icable. Among the ancients, whofe commercial tranfadlions were lefs important and extenfive than thofe of the moderns, filver was weighed as well as gold; nay even brafs, in fome cafes. ^ In Greece, large fums were determined by mna or Greek mc>- mince; and the moft capital fums by talents. In every ney. country the mina is fuppofed to have contained 100 drachmas, or fmall filver coins, of that country, and the talent 60 minae. The mina is fuppofed to be a pound weight of the country to which it belonged. The Attic pound; according to Dr Arbuthnot, con¬ tained. MED cient tained 16 ounces, oqual to our avoirdupois pound: >"ey' but Mr Pinkerton looks upon this as a very abfurd opinion, and accufes the Do&or of having adopted it merely that he may explain a paflage in Livy. He is of opinion, that the Attic pound is very nearly the fame with the pound Troy. The mina of Athens had at firft 73 drachms; but by Solon it was fixed at too. The ancient drachm weighed the fame which it does at prefent in medical weight, viz. the eighth part of an ounca The mina or pound of 12 ounces had con- fequently 96 of thefe drachms; but four of them were given to the round fum to fupply delefts in the alloy; “ and indeed (fays our author), in confequence of a common praftice in all ages and in all countries, of giving fome addition to a large weight. Thus the pound in weight had but 96 drachma: in faft, while the pound in tale had 100; as the Roman libra in weight had but 84 denarii; in tale too; and as our pqund in tale, by an inverfe progrefs, is not a third of ^ our pound in common weight.” e an- Notwithftanding the very Severe criticifm on Dr <«- Arbuthnot juft mentioned, however, we find our au¬ thor adopting his account of the talents ufed in coin¬ age in feveral countries. Thus, according to the Doftor, The Syrian talent had 15 Attic mina:. .Ptolemaic - -2 0 . Antiochian - 60 Euboean - - 60 "Babylonian - 70 Larger Attic * 80 Tyrian - 80 Egyptian - 80 Eginean - too R :••••'! • ICO 'Notwithftanding the conceflion made here by Mr Pinkerton to the Doftor, he tells us, that he very much queftions this lift of talents, and that many an¬ cient writers are little to be relied upon. “Writers on this fubjeft confefs, that the numbers in all ancient manufcripts are the parts moft fubjeft to error, as be¬ ing almoft always contrafted. They ought to allow that the authors themfelves muft often be liable to wrong information. “ Herodotus mentions, that King Darius ordered gold to be paid into his treafury by the Euboic ta¬ lent, and filver by the Babylonian. The Euboic is efteemed the fame with that called afterwards the At- ■tic : and as we eftimate gold by carats, fo it is natu¬ ral to fuppofe, that the moft precious metal would be regulated by the moft minute weight. But I con¬ fefs, I take the Babylonic talent to be the fame with that of iEgina. Mr Raper has proved the firft coins of Macedon to be upon the ftandard of iEgina. Now the early Perfian coins are upon that veiy fcale, the dargeft tetradrachms weighing from 430 to 440 grains. Hence it follows, that the Perfian filver coins were of the ./Eginian ftandard; and the payment was certainly to be made according to the ftandard of the money. The larger Attic talent was of 80 lefler minae; becaufe the larger Attic mina was of 16 ounces. The Alex¬ andrian talent, according to Feftus, confifted of 12,000 denarii, being the fame with that ufed by the Egyp¬ tian kings in their coins; and is fhown by Mr Raper .to have been the fame with the talent of A>ina. Per- N»soi. A L S. Sea.V. haps the whole of the ancient coins of Afia, Africa, Ancient Greece, Magna Grecia, and Sicily, are reducible to , loilt:y- < three talents or ftandards. 1. That of fEgina, ufed in " ' • moft of the more ancient filver coinages; as would feem in even the later of Egypt, Carthage, Cyrene, &c. 2. The Attic (being the Afiatic gold ftandard, afterwards ufed by Phidon king of Argos in eftima- ting gold, and called Eiiboic from Euboea, one of the quarters of the city of Argcs), ufed in Athens and the greater part of the world as the ftandard both of gold and filver. 3. The Doric or Sicilian talent of 24 nummi, each worth an obolus and an half; whence the talent is eftimated at fix Attic drachms or three darics. Thefe weights continued to be the ftandard of money after it began to be diftingaifhed by im- preflion ; nay, to the fall of Greece and prevalence of the Roman empire.” Coinage, according to Herodotus, was firft invent- ed by the Lydians, from whom the Greeks quickly re«originates ceived it. The former could not have received it from in lydia. the Perfians, whofe empire did not begin till 570 B.C. though our author, fuppofes that it might have pro¬ ceeded from the Syrians, who carried on commerce in ^ very ancient times. The moft ancient Greek coins of Moft an- ■filver have an indented mark upon one fide, and a tor-cient Greek toife upon the other; and thofe of greateft antiquityco“1^e* have no letters upon them. Thofe of later date havelcriDed' Ain marked upon them, which medallifts interpret of iEgium in Achaia; being led into that fuppofition by the tortoife, which they look upon as the fure mark of the Peloponnefus. But though our author agrees that the tortoife was fo, he thinks that they are other- wife very far wrong in their conclufions. ./Egium in Achaia was a place of no confequence till the times of Aratus and the Achaian league; but there are 11 of thefe coins in Dr Hunter s cabinet, which fliow that they muft have been ftruck in times of the moft re¬ mote antiquity, and that the place where they were » ftruck was rich and flouriihing at the time. The coins we fpeak of are not uncommon; but thofe which have the name aiteixin at full length, and which may perhaps belong to Aigium in Achaia, are extremely . jfcarce; infomuch that in all Dr Hunter’s vaft collec¬ tion there are not above one or two. They are like- wife conftrudted upon a fcale quite different from all other Grecian money; being of 8, 13, 90, and about 186 grains. The Grecian drachma at an ave¬ rage is 66 grains; and Mr Pinkerton thinks it would have been ftrange if pieces had been ftruck of eight- tenths of an obolus, of an obolus and an half, or of a drachma and an half. dEgium being originally an ob- fcure village, could not be the firft which coined mo¬ ney.* fo that Mr Pinkerton fuppofes the name ’•1 r 1 to have ftood for JEgialus, the ancient name of Si- cyon, a wealthy and powerful city; or rather iEgina, the mint of which was much celebrated, and perhaps the moft ancient in Greece. Other arguments in favour of thefe coins being de¬ rived from iEgina, are drawn from their weight as weft as their workmanfhip, which are quite different from thofe bearing the name of iEgium at full length. The coinage of Aigina is known to have been different from that of the reft of Greece; infomuch that its drachma was worth 10 Attic oboli, while the tti-c drachma was valued only at fix. Hence the drrch- nua Sea.V. MED Ancient mas of iEgina were named by the Greeks *««««, or Money, tkicl,. a name very applicable to the coins in queftion. V- z—w prom obfervations, our author is of opinion, that we may even diftinguilh the precife weight of the an¬ cient coins of iEgina. According to the exaft pro¬ portion, the drachma of this place fhould weigh ex¬ actly no grains; and one of them very much rubbed weighed above 90. The others of larger fize, *which feem to be didrachms of iEgina, weigh from 181 to 194 grains; but the latter being the only one he could meet with in good prefervation, it was impoffible to form any juft medium. Even in thofe beft preferved, he thinks that ten grains may be allowed for a wafte of the metal in fo long a time as 2400 years, which would bring the drachma of iEgina near its proper ftandard. The obolus of iEgina was in proportion to its drachma of fix oboli. It is the piece of 15^ grains, and 13 when very much rubbed. The hemi- obolon is that of eight, and when rubbed ought to weigh nine. The^drach general denomination of the Greek money is ma the " drachma, or eighth part of an ounce; which to this moft gene-day is retained in the medical weights, the Grecian ral denomi- coins receiving their names from the weights they bore; nation. though in feme inftances the weights received their appellations from the coins. The filver drachma, ac¬ cording to Mr Pinkerton, was about nine pence fter- ling; and he finds fault with thofe who make the drachma and denarius both equal to one another, the latter being no more than eight pence. The didrachm of filver, according to the fame calculation, was worth 18 d.; but the tridrachm occurs very rarely : and Mr Pinkerton is even of opinion, that medallifts give this name to the didrachm of ^gina. The largeft of all the Grecian coins is the tetradrachm, which on the iEginean ftandard is worth five Ihillings ; but in thofe of the other ftates only four. There are, however, many fubdivifions in the filver drachma; the higheft being the tetraobolion or coin of four oboli; being in proportion to the drachma as our groat to a fixpence, weighing about 44 grains, and being in value about fixpence. The hemidrachm or triobolion comes next in value, weighing about 33 grains, and worth four- pence halfpenny. The filver diobolion, or third of the drachma, weighs about 22 grains, and is worth three pence. The obolus of filver weighs about 11 grains, and is worth only three halfpence. There is likewife a hemiobolion in filver, or half the obolus, of five grains and an half, value three farthings: and another called tetartobolion dichalcos or quarter obolus, which is the moft minute coin yet met with ; and by reafon of its extreme fmallnefs, weighing only two grains and a quarter, is now very fcarce : but there is one in the cabinet of Dr Hunter, and fome more have been lately brought from Athens by Mr Stu¬ art. Some of them are likewife met with at Taren- tum. It would appear, however, that there were fome ftill fmaller, and of value only three-fourths of a farthing. None of thefe have been met with ; and the fmallnefs of the fize renders it improbable that any will ever be met with; as the peafants, who com¬ monly difcover coins, would probably either not ob- ierve them at all, or if they did would neglect them as things of no value. Vol. XI. Part I, A L S. 9 Many different names have been impofed on. the Ancient coins belonging to the different ftates of Greece: thus l0nt:y‘ f K°?», the maiden, was a name often applied to the te¬ tradrachm, and w-hich would feem to apply to thofe Differ^,,,, of Athens; thpugh there are coins of other cities withnam-s of the head of Proferpine, and the word K’f", to which G^eek it would appear more applicable in our author's opi-com*' nion. theJhell, was the name of another coin from its type. A Sicilian coin was named Af^eri^ from Gelon’s wife. A tetradrachm was named K^aa-arayouf, and had eight or hcmidrachms. The fo called from, its country Troizene, had Pallas on one fide and a trident on the reverie. The hemiobolion was the of Lacedemon ; and the Ko/at/0@- is fuppofed to have been equal to the Roman feftertius or quarter drachma. The colophon were coins with the myftic cheft or hamper of Bacchus upon them, out of which a ferpentrifes; and are much celebrated in antiquity. We are told by Livy, that Marcus Acilius, in his triumph over Antiochus and - the Etolians, carried 248,000 of them ; Cneius Man¬ lius Vulfo in that over Gallo-Gr3ecia had 250,000; and Lucius Emilius Regillus, in his naval triumph over the fleets of Antiochus, had 131,300. Cicero like- wufe mentions his being poffeffed of a vaft fum in them. The moft probable opinion concerning them feems to be, that they are all filver tetradrachm s; fuch as be¬ long to the cities of Apamea and Laodicea in Phry¬ gia ; Pergamus in Myfia ; Sardes and Tralles in Ly¬ dia ; and Ephefue; but it is a miftake to aferibe any to Crete. Mr Pinkerton thinks it abfurd to imagine that Crete, a fmall ifland, fliould ftrike fuch vaft num¬ bers of coins; though Cicero mentions his being in poffeffion of an immenfe treafure imthem at the time he was governor of Afia Minor. “ It is moft likely (fays Mr Pinkerton), that his wealth fliould be in the coin of the countiy to which he belonged. But what had thefe triumphs ©r Cicero’s government to do with Cretan money ? But indeed the coins themfelves, as above noticed, eftablilh the faft.” Another fet of coins famous in antiquity were thofe 34 of Cyzicus in Myfia, which were of gold; but they are Co*IJS now almoft entirely vanifhed by being recoined in G>'Z1CUS* other forms. The AjiavJixov or money of Ary- andes, who was made governor of Egypt by Cam- byfes, is made mention of by Hefychius; but none of them, as far as is known, have reached our times. They muft have been marked with Perfian charadters, if with any. The coin of Queen Philijlis is mentioned by the fame writer, and many of thefe pieces are ftill extant; but we know not where this queen reigned, nor does there feem to be any method of finding it out. Mr Pinkerton inclines to believe, that (he pre- fided over Sicily ; and as a confirmation of that fup- pofition, mentions fome inferiptions of baxiaisxas Iuan and it is remarkable, that moft of them which have reached us are of a very late period, with the names of B magiilrates to MED Anc'cnt magiflrates infcribed upon them. Some of thefe bear . Money. < ^ name 0f MIthridates ; and few are older than the v " era of that prince ; who, it is well known, took the city of Athens in his war with the Romans. I fuf- pe& (fays Mr Pinkerton) that no Athenian coins of filver are pofterior to Sylla’s infamous deftruftion of that city : an event the more remarkable, as Sallull tells us, that Sylla was learned in Greek. Indeed Ca. ligula, Nero, and moil of the pefts of fociety, have been learned men, in fpfte of a noted axiom of Ovid, ingenuas didic'ijje feliciter artes Emollet mores, nec ft nit ejfe feros. It is ftill more remarkable, that the fabric of Athe¬ nian coins is almoil univerfally very rude : a lingular circumflance, if we refleft how much the arts fkmrifh- ed there. It can only be accounted for from the ex¬ cellence of their artills being fuch as to occalion all the good ones to be called into other countries, and none but the bad left at home. In like manner, the coins ftruck at Rome in the imperial times are excel¬ lent, as being done by the beft Greek artifts; while thofe of Greece, though famous at that time for pro* ducing miraculous artiils, are during that period com¬ monly of very mean execution. The opulence of A- thens in her days of glory was very great; owing in an eminent degree to her rich commerce with the kingdoms dm the Euxine fea ? carried on chiefly from Delos, which belonged to Athens, and was the grand centre of that trade.” Hence it has become matter of furprife to Neumann, that when there are fo many coins of Mycene, an illand even proverbially poor, there Ihould be none of Delos. But Mr Pinker¬ ton accounts for this from Mycene’s being a free ftate, and Delos fubjeft to Athens. “ It may be well fup- pofed (fays he', that Athens had a mint at Delos; and fuch Athenian coins as have fymbols of Apollo, Diana, or Latoha, were ftruck in this iftand.'5 36 The copper-money of the Greeks is next fn anti- Greek cop- qU;ty to the filver. Mr Pinkerton is of opinion, that per money. jt was not ufe(j at Athens till the 26th year of the Pe- loponnefian war ; about 404 years before Chrift, and 300 after filver was firft coined there. The firft cop¬ per coins were thofe of Gelo of Syracufe, about 490 B. C. 37 The chalcos of brafs, of which eight went to the Of the chal- £}ver 0bolus, feems to have been the firft kind of ^0,' Greek coin. At firft it was looked upon as of fo little confequence, that it became proverbial; and to fay that a thing was not worth a chalcos, was equivalent to faying that it was worth nothing. As the Greeks became poor, however, even this diminutive coin was fubdivided into two, four, nay eight rixTa. or fmall Coins; but our author cenfures very feverely thofe who have given an account of thofe divifions. “ Pol¬ lux and Suidas, copying from him (fayshe), tell us, that there were feven lepta to one chalcos; a number the moft unlikely that can be, from its indivifibility and incapacity of proportion. “ Pollux Ijved in the time of Commodus, fo was too late to be of the fmalleft authority : Suidas is four or five centuries later, and out of the queftion. Pliny tells us, that there were ten chalci to the obolus; Diodo¬ rus and Cleopatra that there were ffix ; Ifidorus fays there were four; and if fuch writers differ about the A I. s. Sea. V. larger denomination, we may well imagine that the Ancient fmaller equally varied in different ftates ; an idea fup- M,ney- , ported by thefe undeniable witneffes the coins which remain. Moft of the Greek copper-coin which has reached our times confifts of chalci; the lepta bei.ng fo fmall as to be- much more liable to be loft.” In Dr Hunter’s cabinet, however, there are feveral of the di- lepta of Athens: and from being ftamped with the reprefentation of two owls, feem to be the fame with the filver diobolus: “ a circumftance (fays Mr Pinker¬ ton) of itfelf fufficient to confute Pollux; for a dilep¬ ton can form no part of feven; a number indeed which never appeared in any coinage of the fame metals, and is contradidtory to common fenfe. It may be ob- ferved, that the whole bcafs coins of Athens publiftied by Dr Combe are reducible to four fixes, which may Be the lepton, dilepton, tetralepton or hemichalcos, and 38 chalcos. The firft is not above the fixe of one of king lepton, James I.’s farthing tokens; the laft about that of our^.et>tou* common, farthing.” The lepta was alfo called as beings change for the poor. The Kofap®-, perhaps fo called from the figure of a wolf upon it, was the coin of a particular ftate, and if of brafs muft have weighed three chalci. The other names of the copper-coins of Greece are but little known. Lycurgus ordered iron money to be coined at Sparta ; but fo periftiable is this metal, that none of that kind of money has reach¬ ed our times. After the conqueft of Greece by the Romans, moft of the coins of that country diminiflied very much in their value, the gold coinage being totally difeonti- nued: though fome of the barbarous kings who ufed the Greek charadter Fwere permitted to coin gold, but they ufed the Roman model; and the ftandard ufed by the few cities in Alia who fpoke the Greek, language in the times of the emperors is entirely un¬ known. Copper feems to have been the only metal coined at that time by the Greeks themfelves ; and that upon the Roman ftandard, then univerfal through the empire, that there might be no impediment to the circulation of currency. They retained, however, fome of their own terms, ufing them along with thofe of the Romans. The ajfarion or ajfarium of Rome, the name of the diminifhed as, being 16 to the drachma or denarius, the obolus was fo much diminiflied in va¬ lue as to be ftruck in brafs not much larger than the old chalcus, and valued at between two and three af- faria; which was indeed its ancient rate as to the drachma. This appears from the copper coins of Chios, which have their names marked upon them. The brafs obolus, at firft equal in fixe to the Roman feftertiusor large brafs, leffensby degrees to about the fixe of a filver drachma. From the badnefs of the imperial coinage in Greece alfo, it appears that brafs was very fcarce in that country, as well as in all the cities ufing the Greek charadfers; being found moftly in the weftern countries of the Roman empire. The 3p time of this declenfion in fixe of the Greek coins is Era of the by Mr Pinkerton fuppofed to have been from Au- declenfion guftus down to Gallienus. He is of opinion, however, Grjetsoin- that the copper obolus, at firft above the fixe of large age. brafs, was ufed in Greece about the time of its firft fubje&ion to Rome ; and that the lepta ceafing, the chalci came in their room, with the dichalcus and the hemiobolion of brafs. With Sea.’V. MED Ancient With refpeA to the gold coins of the Greeks, Mr . M°ney. Pinkerton is of opinion that none of that metal was 4Q coined before the time of Philip of Macedon, as none va There were befides fome leffer divifions of gold coins, which could not be worth above two drachmas. Thefe were coined in Cyrcne ; and there were befides feveral old gold coins of Afia Minor, the value of which is now unknown. Our author fuppofes that they were coined not with relation to their weight as parts of the drachma, but merely to make them correfpond with fo many filver pieces as was necefiary. There are alfo larger coins than the x- but denies that the as, or libra, a coin, was from Sicilian model. The Sicilians had indeed a coin named but it was of filver, and of equal value to. the Eginean ftandard, ten of which went to the Sicilian He differs from Gro¬ novius, that the ftandard of jEgina was ufed at Co¬ rinth, and of courfe at Syracufe 5 as it appears from Arillotle, that the Sicilians had a talent or ftandard of their own. The Sicilian obolus or contained al¬ fo 12 ounces or chalci, fo named at firft becaufe they weighed an ounce weight; but the 0f Hiero weigh more than a troy ounce; and the brafs coins of Agrigentum are marked with cyphers as far as fix: the largeft weighing only 186 grains, or about one third of the primitive ounce. Our author denies that even the Roman denarius took its rife from the Si- of 34 and of 53 Roman ounces; having upon oneman S0lDS‘ fide the figure of a bull rudely impreffed, and upon the other the bones of a fifh. They are moft com¬ monly found at Tudder, or Tudertum in Umbria J but they appear always broken at one end : fo that Mr Pinkerton is of opinion that perhaps fome might be ftruck of the decuffis form, or. v/eighing ten pounds. Thefe pieces, in our author’s opinion, make it evi¬ dent, that the Romans derived their large brafs coin» from the Etrufcans and the neighbouring ftates : they are all call in moulds ; and the greater part of them appear much more ancient than the Roman afes, evea fuch aa arc of the greateft antiquity. Se£t, of the dates of the Roman coinage is given by Mr A"“ Pinkertqn. Mo The libralis, coined by TuIIus with the figures of oxen, See. about 167 years after the building of Rome, according to Sir Ifaac Newton, or about the year be- V. MEDALS. nt Mr Pinkerton agrees with Sir Ifaac Newton as to the y- time that Servius Tullius reigned in Rome, which he fuppofes to be about 460 B. C. His coinage feems to have been confined to the as, or piece of brafs having the impreffion of Janus on the one fide and rhe prow of a ihip on the other, becaufe Janus arrived in Italy by fea. fore Chrift Varro, however, informs us, that the very firft coins As libralis with Janus and the prow of a Ihip of Tullius had the figure of a bull, or other cattle As of ten ounces upon them, like the Etrufcan coins, of which they were imitations. Thofe with the figure of Janus and the prow of a Ihip upon them may be fuppofed firft to have appeared about 400 B. C. but, in a Ihort time, various fubdivifions of the as were coined. The *3 Eight Six Four Three Two, according to Pliny 1 4'8 femis or half is commonly llamped with the head ©f One, according to the fame author Iso/the JuP'ter laureated ; the trieru or third, having four cy- , phers, as being originally of four ounces weight, has the head of Minerva; the quadrant or quarter, marked with three cyphers, has the head of Hercules wrapt in the lion’s Ikin; the fextans or fixth, having only two cyphers, is marked with the head of Mercury with a cap and wings ; while the uncia having only one cypher, is marked with the head of Rome. All 460 400 3 00 290 280 270 260 250 214 About 175 B. C. alfo, we are informed by Pliny, that the as was reduced to half an ounce by the Papy- rian law, at which it continued till the time of Pliny himfelf, and long after. After the Romans began to have an intercourfe with Greece,a variety of elegant figures appearupon the parts of the as, though not on the as itfelf till after the time of Sylla. Towards the latter end of the republic alfo, thefe coins appear to have been call in moulds, by a dupondii, or double afes, were coined, together with confiderable number at a time; and in the Britilh mu- the feftertii serei, which came in place of the quadruf- feum there are four of them all united together as fes> when the denarius began to be reckoned at 16 afes ; taken out of the mould in which perhaps dozens were probably at the time the latter was reduced to half an call together. In procefs of time, however, thefmall- ounce. In fome inllances it is to beobferved, that the er divifions were ftruck inllead of being call ; but " the larger Hill continued to be call until the as fell to two ounces. Even after this time it was ft ill called libra, and accounted a pound of copper; Romans accommodated their coins to the country where j r. their army was ftationed ; whence we have many coins CoIbs on marked as Roman, which have been coined in Magna Grecia and Sicily, and are evidently upon, the Greek/j as Ro- " Larger de- though there were now larger denominations of it and not the Roman feale. In the latter part of the noirina coined, fuch as the biffas or double as : treffis and qua- republican times, alfo, the types begin to vary ; fo tions of it drufis of three and four afes; nay as far as decujfis or that we have a brafs coin fuppofed to be ftruck by ruc * ten afes, marked X. Olivieri mentions one in his own Sextus Pompeius in Sicily, having upon it a double cabinet weighing upwards of 25 ounces, and call when head of that warrior, reprefenting a Janus. Mr Pin- the as was about three ounces weight. There is likewife kerton fuppofes it to have been a dupondius ; which in the Mufseum Etrufcum a decuflis of 40 Roman indeed appears to be the cafe from the double head, ounces, call when 'the as was at four ounces. There This coin is of copper, and ftill weighs an ounce, not- was likewife a curious decuflis in the Jefuit’s library withftanding its antiquity. at Rome, for which an Englilh medallift offered 20I.; but it was feized by the Pope along with every other thing belonging to the fociety. Mr Pinkerton eontefts the opinion of Pliny that The largeft imperial copper coin was the feftertius, 5* apiece worth about two-pence of our money. Mrr^e k*’' Pinkerton cenfures feverely the opinion of otlier me-^ertnM*’ dallifts, all of whom fay that the feftertius'was of id- Lecreafc of the as continued of a pound weight till the end of ver. “ In faA (fays he), it would be as rational in the firft Punic war. His opinion (he fays) is con¬ futed by the coins which ftill remain ; and it appears probable to him that the as decreafed gradually in weight; and, from one or two of the pieces which ftill exift, he feems to think that the deereafe was flow, as from a pound to eleven ounces, then to ten. any antiquary, a thoufand years hence, to contend that the halfpenny and farthing are of filver, becaufe they were fo in the reign of Henry VIII.” In con¬ firmation of his own opinion, he quotes the following paflage from Pliny “ The greateft glory of brafs is now due to the Marian, called alfo that of Cordova. nine, &c.; but neither the as nor its parts were ever This, after the Livian, moft abforbs the lapis calami- eorre&ly fized. During the time of the feeond Punic Baris, and imitates the goodnefs of native orichalcum war, when the Romans were fore prefled by Hanni- in our feftertii and dupondiarii, the afes being con- bal, the as was reduced to a Angle ounce. It is faid tented with their own copper.” Gronovius confefles to have taken place in the 215th year before our era, that he does not know what to make of this paflage, being about 36 years after the former change. This and that it caufes him hefitate in his opinion. The as libralis, with the face of Janus upon it, is the form Livian mine mentioned here by Pliny, is fuppofed to moft commonly met with previous to its being redu- have got its name from L'roia the wife of Auguftus j ced to two ounces. Our author fuppofes that the as and it is probable that the pieces marked with her libralis continued for at leaft a century and an half portrait, intitkd Justitia, Salus, Vrarus, &c. after the coinage of Tullus, down to 300 B. C. about were dupondii from this very mine, the metal being, the year of Rome 452, between which and the 502d exceedingly fine, and of the kind named Corinthian. year of Rome a gradual diminution of the as to two- brafs by the ancient medallifts. “ Perhaps (fays Mr eunces oiuft have- taken place. The following table Pinkerton) the mine received its name from this very u MED Ancicnf circumfiance-erf her coins being ftruck in the metal Money. ta}ien from it.” ^ No change took place in the Roman coinage from . (jokfagc the time that the as fell to half an ounce to the of > ellow davs of Pliny: but Mr Pinkerton obferves, that be- ■tsrdf;, fore the time- of Julius Cefar yellow brafs began to be ufed, and was always looked upon to be double the value of Cyprian Or red copper. There are but few coins in large brafs immediately before Julius Ctefar, or even belonging to that emperor ; but from the time of Auguttus downward, the large coins are all found of brafs, and not one of them copper. The largeft of what are called the middle iize are all of yellow brafs; and the next fize, which is the as, and weighs half an ounce, is unive*rfally copper. What the ancients na¬ med ork/w/cam, or what we call lrajs, was always look¬ ed upon to be greatly fuperior in value to the ass cy- prium. Procopius, fpeaking of a ftatue of Juftinian, tells us, that brafs infei-ior in colour to gold is almoft equal in value to filver. The mines of native brafs were very few in number, and were owing entirely to the lingular combination of copper and lapis calamina- ris in the bowels of the earth, which very feldom oc¬ curs ; and the ancients were far from being well ac¬ quainted with the method of combining thefe two bo¬ dies artificially; fo that yellow brafs was always efteem- ed at double the value of copper: and hence, in the ancient coinages, the brafs and copper pieces were kept as diftindt as-tliofe of gold and filver. Mr Pinkerton challenges to himfelf the difeovery > that the imperial fellertius was of brafs; and is at con- fiderable pains'to bring proofs of it. Befides the te¬ stimony of Pliny, which of itfelf would be decifive, this isfupported by the llrongeft collateral evidence of other authors. From a pafiage in Julius Africanus, who wrote the ©r Treatife on Medicine, it ap¬ pears that the nummus, or feftertius, weighed an ounce, and of confequence that it could not be filver but brafs; and all the large imperial Roman coins weigh an ounce. We know not the age in which Ju¬ lius Africanus lived ; but as he makes the denarius to contain 16 afes, he mull have been before the age of Gallienus, when it had 60. Gronovius fuppofes him to have been the fame mentioned by Eufebius. This author fpeaks of a Julius Africanus who lived in the time of Heliogabulus, and whom Mr Pinkerton fup¬ pofes to have been the fame with him above men- tioned. Diminution The feftertius underwent no change till the time of of the fe- Alexander Severus, when it was diminifhed by one ftertius. third of its weight. Trajanus Decius was the firft who coined double feftertii, or quinarii, of brafs ; but from the time of Trebonianus Gallus to that of Gal- lieiur, when the firft brafs ceafes, the feftertius does not weigh above the third part of an ounce: the lar¬ ger coins are accounted double feftertii ; and after the time of Gallienus it totally vanifhes. In the time of Valerian and GaUienu* we find a new kind of coin¬ age, mentioned by ti e name otdenarii arts, or Philip* pi ar'ei. Two fizes of denarii began to be ufed in the time of Caracalla ; the larger of .fix feftertii, or 24 afiaria ; the fmaller of four feftertii, or 16 affaria as ufual. In the time of Pupienus, the latter was redu¬ ced to fuch a fmall fize as not to weigh more than 36 grains j though in Caracallatime it weighed 56. A L S. Sect. v. After-the time of Gordian III. the fmaller coin fell Ancient into difiife, as breeding confufion. The larger dena- Money' rius of fix feftertii, though diminifhed at lait to the fize of the early denarius, {till retained its value of fix feftertii, or 24 aflaria. The Phdippus areas came at length in place of the fefteitius. It was alfo called denarius ; from which we may learn not only their .fize, but that they were in value ten aflaria as the firft denarius. In the reign of Dioclefian, the place of the feftertius was fupplied by the follis, that emperor having reftored the filver coin to its purity, and like- wife given this form to the copper; but it would feem that this reftoration of fhe coinage only took place to¬ wards the end of his reign ; whence we have but few of his filver coins, and ftill fewer of the folks, though the denarii arei continue quite common down to the time of Conftantine. The follis of Diocldian feems to have weighed above half an ounce ; and Mr Pin¬ kerton is of opinion, that Dioclefian deiigned this coin to fupply the place of the denarius sereus; which of courfe was worth ten affariae, and fix of them went to the filver denarius. From this time the aflarium diminilhes to the iize of 30 grains ; and foon after the follis appeared, the denarius aereus was entirely drop¬ ped, the former having gradually fupplied its place. Some mints appear to have retained the ufe of the de¬ narius longer than others ; and in fome the change was preceded, and gradually brought in by wafhing the follis with filver or tin, as the denarius had for¬ merly been. Pieces of this kind occur in the times of Dioclefian, Maximian I. and II. and Conftantius I.j that is, for about ten years after the follis made its ap¬ pearance. Some countries, however, retained the de¬ narius cereus ; others the follis; and fome had a me¬ dium betwixt the two, or the follis wafhed in imita¬ tion of the denarius. Towards the end of the reign of Conftantine La new coinage was introduced throughout the whole empire. The follis coined by this prince was of halfduced by' an ounce v/eight; 24 of them going to the milliaren-Conftan- fis, or larger filver coin. The word fo/lis fignifies alfotine *• a purfe, in which fenfe we fometimes find it mention¬ ed in the Byzantine hiftory. The common follis of filver, when it occurs by itfelf, means a puri'e of 250 milliarenfes, as the feftertium was 250 denarii; and by a law of Conftantine 1. every man paid to the fta.te a fol¬ lis or purfe according to his income. The method of counting by purfes continues in Turkey to this day. The duponchus was only half the value of the feftertius, *6 or about one penny Sterling; and Before the yellow Of the dit- brafs appeared it feems to have been ftruck upon cop-Pou<*‘us* per, and double the fize of the as. There are fome of this coin, ftruck in the time of Julius Cstfar, in yel- low brafs, weighing half an ounce, with a head of Venus Vi£trix upon one fide; on the reverfe, a female figure, with ferpents at her feet: while others have a Vitlory on the reverfe, with Q^Oppius Pr. After the time of Auguftus, the dupondnts was ftruck in yellow brafs ; which Pliny tells us was alfo the cafe in his time. The word dupondiarius feemsto have been ufedby Pliny, and adopted, not to exprefs that the coin was dupondius, but that it was of dupondiary value. Neither was the former word confined to fignify double weight, but was ufed alfo for double length or meafure, as in the in- ftance of dupond'ms pes, or two feet, &c. In the im¬ perial Sea. V. MED Ancient perial times, therefore, dupondius was ufed, not to fig- Money. £;fy a coin 0f double the weight of the as, but of double the value. It was one of the moll common of the Roman coins ; and feems to have been very com¬ mon even in Conftantinople. In the time of Juf- tinian, it feems there was a cuftom of nicknaming young Undents of the law dupondii, againft which the emperor made a law ; but it is not known what gave rife to the name. The dupondms, though of the fame fue with the as, is commonly of finer workman- Ihip, the metal being greatly fupenor in value. It continues to be of yellow brafs, as well as the ielter- tins, to the time of Gallienus ; but the as is always of copper. 57 The imperial as, or atfarium, was worth only an Of the af- halfpenny. At firtt it weighed half an ounce, and feriuni- was always of copper till the time oi Gallienus, when it was made of brafs, and weighed only^ the eight part of an ounce. From the time of Galhenus to that of Dioclefian, it continued to dimimlh ihll more, thefize being then twenty to an ounce. This was the fame with the lepta, or fmallelt coins but the vowua, which weighed only ten grains. & The parts of the as occur but leldom ; which may, fharts of indeed, be well expefted, confidering the low value of 6 aS' it; though there ftill occur fome oi thofe called femis, triens, quadrans, fextans, and uncia, coined in the times of Nero and Domitian. There is no fmall brafs from the time of Pertinax to that of Gallienus, ex¬ cepting that of Trajanus Decius ; but in the time of Gallienus it becomes extremely common ; and the coins of fmall brafs, as well as the larger, are always mark¬ ed S. C. fuch as want it being umverfally accounted forgeries, and were plated with filver, though the plating be now worn off. The fmall pieces itruck for Haves during the time of the faturnaha muff alio be diffinguiihed from the parts of the as. The S. C. upon thefe moff probably iignifies Saturm ConfuUo, and were ffruck in ridicule of the true coins, as the ilaves 59 on that occafion had every privilege oi irony. Of the The feftertius dimihifhes from Pertinax to Gallienus Roman fo faft that no PartS °f the aS ^ itrUtk’ kfelf bCin£ coins.”1 fo fmall. Trajanus Decius, indeed, coined iome imaii pieces, which went for the femis of the time. 'I he fmall brafs coins under Gallienus were called affaria, fjxty of which went to the filver denarius. They are about the iize of the denarius, and fome of them oc¬ cur of the coinage of Gallus and his family, of half thatfize, which appear to have been ftruck during the latter part of his reign, when the affarium was dimi- nifiled to a ftill fmaller fize. It is probable, however, that fome of thefe very fmall coins had been ftruck in all ages of the empire, in order to fcatter among the 60 people on folemn occafions. Mr Pinkerton is of opi- Of the mif- nion that they are the mijjiha, though moft other me- daliifts think that they were medallions. “ But if fo (fays our author), they were certainly called mijjika a non mittendo j for it would be odd it fine medallions were fcattered among the mob. It is a common cuf¬ tom juft now to ftrike counters to fcatter among the populace on fuch occafions, while medals are given to peers of the kingdom ; and we may very juftly reafon from analogy on this occafion.” The ajjarion vr Upton of the Conftantinopolitan em- A L S. 15 pire was, as we have already obfmed, one of the Ancient fmalleft coins known in antiquity, weighing no more Money~ , than 20 grains; and the noumia were the very fmalleft ^ which have reached our times, being only one-half of the former. By reafon of their extreme fmallnefs, they are very fcarce ; but Mr Pinkerton informs us, that he has in his poffeffion a fine one of Theodofius II. which has on it the emperor’s head in profile. Theo¬ dofius P. F. AV.; on uthe reverfe a wreath, having in the centre vot. xx.: mult. xxx. The principal coin of the lower empire was the fol- 61 lis, which was divided into an half and quarter, narned^1°^v^gr 3>t!ero^x;®-and Tsrzf j-v; the latter of which is fliownempjre> by Du Cange to have been a fmall brafs coin, as the other is fuppofed to have been by Mr Pinkerton.— Befides thefe, the follis was divided into 8 oboli, 16 affaria or lepta, and 32 noumia, though in common computation it contained 40 of thefe laft. This coin, notwithftanding fo many divifions, was of no more • value than an halfpenny. Mr Pinkerton controverts an opinion, common among medallifts, that the largeft brafs coin or follis of the lower empire had 40 fmall coins, expreffed by the letter M upon it ; the next had 3c, exprefftd by the letter a ; the half by the letter K ; and the quar¬ ter marked I, which contained only io. Mr. Pinker¬ ton informs us, that he has three coins of Anaftafius,. all marked M in large : one of them weighs more than half an ounce ; the fecond 40 grains lefs; and the third of 160 grains, or one-third of an ounce ; but the fize is fo very unequal, that the laft, which is very thick, does not appear above half the fize of the firft. There are pieces of Juftinian which weigh a whole ounce; but the fize of copper was increafed as the filver became fcarcer ; and the value of the coinage cannot be deduced from the weight of the coins, as it is plain that our own coinage is not of half the value with regard to the metal. A great number of medal¬ lions were ftruck by Conftantius II. but there is no other copper larger than the half ounce, excepting that of Anaftafius, when the follis began to be ftruck larger. All medallifts allow the others to be medallions. The metal employed in thefe very fmall coins, though at firft of brafs, was always a bafe and refufe kind j but copper is generally made ufe of in the parts of the as from the earlieft times to the lateft ; and if brafs be fometimes employed, it is never fuch as ap¬ pears in the feftertii and dupondiarii, which is very fine and beautiful, but only the refufe. “ Yellow brafs of the right fort (fays Mr Pinkerton) feems totally to have ceafed in the Roman coinage with the fefter¬ tius, under Gallienus, though a few fmall coins of very bad metal appear under that hue as late as Ju¬ lian II.” Silver was coined in Rome only as late as the 485th year of the city, or 266 B. C. Varro indeed fpeaksRoman of filver having been coined by Servius Tullius, and^ver. the libella having been once in filver ; but Pliny’s au¬ thority muft be accounted of more weight than that of this author, as he miftakes the of Sicily for Roman coins, having been current at Rome during the time of the firft Punic war. Even Pliny, accord¬ ing to our author, very frequentlynniftakes with regard, to matters much antecedent to his own. time; and; J among.; i6 MED Ancient among the moderns he criticifes feverely Erafmus and , M, liey~ Hume. “ Erafmus (fays he), who had been in Eng- L"' janci for fome time, talks of leaden money being ufed here. Not even a leaden token was ftruck in the reign of Henry VIII.; yet his authority has been fol¬ lowed with due deference to fo great a name ; for how could Erafnaus, who mull have feen the matter with his own eyes, afl'ert a direft falfehood ? To give a later inftance in a writer of reputation, Mr Hume, in vol. vi. of his hiftory, has thefe words, in treating of the reign of James I. “ It appears that copper halfpence and farthings began to be coined in this reign. Tradefmen had commonly carried on their re¬ tail bufinefs by leaden tokens. The fmall filver penny was foon loft; and at this time was nowhere to be found.” Copper halfpence and farthings were not ftruck till Charles II. 1672 : there were fmall tokens for farthings ftruck in copper by James I. but not one for the halfpenny. The filver farthings had ceafed with Edward VI. but the filver halfpence continued the foie coins till Charles II. It was by copper tokens that fmall bufinefs was carried on. The filver penny was much ufed till the end of the reign of George I.; and, fo far from being nowhere to be found, is fuper- abundant of every reign fince that period, not except¬ ing even the prefent reign of George III. From thefe inftances the reader may judge how ftrangely writers of all ages blunder, when treating a fubjeft of which they are entirely ignorant.” The firft filver denarii coined at Rome, are fup- Denarii pofed by our author to have been thofe which are im- when firft preffed with the Roma ; and he inclines to account coined. the moft ancient which have a double female head on the one fide, and on the reverfe Jupiter in a car, with Victory holding the reins, and the word Roma indented in a rude and Angular manner. The double female head feems to denote Rome, in imita¬ tion of the Janus then upon the as. There are 15 of thefe in the Cabinet of Dr Hunter; one of the largeft weighs 98J- grains: and the reft, which feem to be of greateft antiquity, are of various weights betwixt that and 84; the fmaHer and more modern weigh 58 or 59 grains ; but Mr Pinkerton is of opinion, that the large ones are of the very firft Roman coinage, and ftruck during that interval of time betwixt the coin¬ age of the firft filver denarius and the as of two ounces. He takes the indentation of the word Roma to be a mark of great antiquity ; fuch a mode being fcarcely known any where elfe, except in Caulonia, Crotona, and other towns of Italy ; all of them allowed to be ftruek at leaft 400 B. C. As thefe large coins are not double denarii, they muft have been ftruck prior to the fmall ones ; and Newmann has given an account of one of them recoined by Trajan, in which the inden¬ tation of Roma is carefully preferved. The firft de¬ narius was in value 10 afes, when the as weighed three ounces ; and allowing 90 grains at a medium for one of thefe large denarii, the proportion of copper to filver muft have been as 1 to 160 ; but when the as fell to one ounce, the proportion was as 1 to 80 ; when it fell to half an ounce, fo that 16 afes went to the denarius, the proportion was as 1 to 64, at which it remained. Copper with us, in coinage, is to filver as 1 to 40 ; but in aftual value as 1 to 72. At Rome the denarius was worth 8d.: the quina* N° 201. A L S. Sea. V. rius 4d.; and the feftertius, whether filver or brafs, 2d. Ancient The denarius is the coin from which our penny is de- Money« rived, and was the chief filver coin in Rome for 600 years. According to Celfus, feven denarii went VaiKf to the Roman ounce, which in metals did not exceed the denarius 430 grains ; but as all the denarii hitherto met with and its weigh at a medium only 60 grains, this would feem Part8, to make the Roman ounce only 420 grains ; though perhaps this deficiency may be accounted for from the unavoidable wafte of metal even in the beft preferved of thefe coins. According to this proportion the Ro¬ man pound contained 84 denarii ; but in tale there was a very confiderable excefs; for no fewer than 100 denarii went to the Roman pound. The Greek ounce appears to have been confiderably larger than that of Rome, containing about 528 grains ; yet not- withftanding this apparently great odds, the difference in the coins was fo fmall, that the Greek money went current in Rome, and the Roman in Greece. The denarius at firft went for 10 afl'es, and was marked X; it was afterwards raifed to 16; which Mr Pinkerton fuppofes to have been about 175 B. C. Some are met with bearing the number XVI. nay, with every number up to CCCCLXXVI. Thefe large numbers are fuppofed to have been mint-marks of fome kind or other. After being raifed to 16 afes, it continu¬ ed at the fame value till the time of Gallienus; fo that till that time we are to look upon its conftituent parts to be 16 afes or affaria, eight dupondii, four brafs feftertii, and two. filver quinarii. Under the emperor Severus, however, or his fucceffor Caracalla, denarii were ftruck of two fizes, one of them a third heavi£rthanthecommon; whichwemuft ofconfequence fuppofe to have borne a third more value. This large piece obtained the name of argenteus, and argenteus Philippus, or the “ filver Philip the name of Philip having become common to almoft every coin. The common denarii now began to be termed minuti and argentei Philippi minutuli, &c. to exprefs their being fmaller than, the reft. Some have imagined that the large denarii were of the fame value with the fmall, only of worfe metal; but Mr Pinkerton obferves, that among the few which have any difference of metal, the fmalleft are always the worft. The firft mention of the minuti is in the time of Alexander Severus, who reduced the price of pork from eight minuti at Rome to two and to one. The minutus argenteus of that age was about 40 grains; and from the badnefs of the metal was not worth above 4d. of our money. Thus the price of meat was by this prince reduced firft to 8d. and then to 4d. According to Zozimus and other writers, the pu- 64 rity of the Roman coin was reftored by Aurelian : Reftorat'oa but Mr Pinkerton controverts this opinion ; thinking^yh0ef^‘ it more probable, that he only made the attempt with- Rotnam out fuccefs ; or that his reformation might be entirely coins, confined to gold, on which there is an evident change after the time of this emperor. His fucceffor Taci. tus is faid to have allowed no brafs to be mixed with filver upon any account; yet the few coins of this emperor are very much alloyed. We are certain, however, that the emperor Dioclefran reftored the fil¬ ver to its ancient purity ; the denarii ftruck in his reign being very fmall indeed, but of as fine filver as the moft ancient coins of the empire. After Gor¬ dian Sea.V. MED Ancient dlan III. the fmall denarius entirely vanifhed, while Money. t^e iarge one was f0 much diminifhed, that it refem- V’" -'r bled the minutus, or fmall one of Caracalla in fize. Gallienus introduced the denarii arei in Head of the fe- Jlertii. The argenteus, though reduced more than one third in fize, contained fix denarii aerei, the old ftand- ard of feftertii. According to the writers of this pe¬ riod, and fome time afterwards, the denarius or ar- genteus contained 60 affaria; whence it follows, that each denarius sereus had io; and from this it probably had its name. The affaria are of the fize of the ar- gentei already mentioned ; and (how the copper to have retained nearly its old proportion of value to the 65 filver, viz. 1 to 60. Reforms- A larger filver coin was introduced by Conftan- tion of t e t; j wh0 accommodated the new money to the by Conftsn- pound or gold in iuch a manner, that 1000 or the ror- tine. mer in tale were equal to the latter in value ; fo that this new piece from thence obtained the name of the milliarenjis or “ thoufander.” Its weight at a medi¬ um is 70 grains, or 70 to the pound of filver : but Mr Pinkerton is of opinion, that it might have contained 72 grains, of which two have now perifhed by the foftnefsof the filver; that the pound contained 72 ; or that two of the number might be allowed for coinage; while the alloy alone would pay for coining gold. The code fays, that 60 went to the pound ; but the numbers of this are quite corrupt. The milliarenfu was worth about a Ihilling fterling. The argentei or de¬ narii, however, were itill the moft common currency; and having been originally rated at the 100 to the pound of filver in tale, they from thence began to be called centenionales, or “ hundreders.” Thofe of Con- ftantine I. and II. Conftans, and Conftantius, weigh from 50 grains down to 40 ; thofe of Julian and Jovian, from 40 to 30 ; and of the fucceeding emperors from that time to Juftinian, from 30 to 20. Under Hera- clius they ceafed entirely; and from Juftinian to their total abolition, had been brought down from 15 to 10 grains. A like decreafe of weight took place in the milliarenfis ; thofe of Conftantine and Conftans being above 70 grains in weight; thofe of Arcadius not above 60; and the milliarenfis of Juftinian not more than 30 grains; but, from the weight of thofe in Dr Hunter’s cabinet, Mr Pinkerton deduces the medium to have been exaftly 70r8T grains. Thefe 65 coins were alfo called majorities. Account of The fmaller filver coins of Rome were, 1. The qui- the fmall narius, at firft called viSoriatus, from the image of Vic- tory on its reverfe ; and which it continued to bear from firft to laft. Its original value was five afes, but it was afterwards raifed to eight, when the value of the denarius increafed to 16. According to Pliny, it was firft coined in confequence of the lex Clodia, about the 523th year of Rome. Some are of opinion, that it was called under the Conftantinopolitan empire, becaufe it was worth a of gold, 144 of which went to the ounce : but this is denied by Mr Pinkerton, becaufe at the time that the word firft appears in hiftory, the denarius did not weigh above 30 grains; and of confequence, as 25 mufthave gone to the gold folidus, of which there were fix in the ounce, 130 denarii mull have gone to the ounce of gold. He is therefore of opinion, that the word Vol. XI. Part I. A L S. 17 x!£«Tiov was only another name for the denarius when Ancient much reduced in fize ; probably owing to the great Money' . fcarcity of filver in Conftantinople, though in the fame "" v city there was plenty of gold ; and of confequence, the gold folidus was never diminifhed. “ For Montef- quieu (fays our author) has well obferved, that gold muft be common where filver is rare. Hence gold was the common regulation of accounts in the Eaftern empire.” The met with in ancient authors, according to Mr Pinkerton, was merely an improper name for the tnilliarenfis; when, on account of the fcarcity of filver, the denarius was reduced, and no milliarenfis coined : fo that the current milliarenfis of former reigns happened to be double to the denarius or centenonialis. The quinarius diminifhes in fize along with the other coins: thofe of Auguftus weigh¬ ts 3° grains, of Severus 25, of Conftantine I. 20, of Juftinian 12, and of Heraclius only 5. A new filver coinage feems to have taken place after the days of this emperor ; as the little we then meet with, which in the beft cabinets fcarce exceeds a dozen of coins, confifls entirely of large unlhapely pieces of coarfe metal. 2. The confular denarius had alfo four filver fefter- Divifions of tii, till the as fell to half an ounce, when it was thought dena- proper to coin the feftertius in brafs, as it continuednus‘ to be ever afterwards. “ The very laft filver fefter¬ tius (fays Mr Pinkerton) which appears, is one with a head of Mercury, and H. S.; on the reverfe a Caduceus p. sepvllivs ; who appears to be the p. sepvllivs macer of the denarii of Julius Caefar. If fo, as is moft probable, the feftertius was coined in filver down to Auguftus; and it is of courfe not to be expefted that any of brafs can appear till Auguftus, under whom they are a&ually quite common. I have in¬ deed feen no coin which could be a confular brafs fe¬ ftertius ; and tho’ we have certainly brafs dupondii of Caefar, yet it is reafonable to infer, that the brafs fe¬ ftertius was firft coined by Auguftus. Not one filver feftertius appears during the Whole imperial period, yet we know that the feftertius was the moft common of all filver coins. The confular feftertii of filver, marked H. S. are not uncommon, nor the quinarii ; but the latter are very fcarce of all the emperors, if we except one inftance, the as 1 a recepta of Au¬ guftus. “ The Roman gold coinage was ftill later than that Roman of filven Pliny tells us, that “ gold was coined 62 S0^- years after filver; and the fcruple went for 60 fefter- ces. It was afterwards thought proper to coin 40 pieces out of the pound of gold. And our princes have by degrees diminilhed their weight to 45 in the pound.” This account is confirmed by the pieces which ftill remain ; for we have that very coin weigh¬ ing a fcruple, which went for 20 felterces. On one fide is the head of Mars, and on the other an eagle ; and it is marked xx. We have another coin of the fame kind, but double, marked xxxx; and its triple, marked or 60; the 't* being the oldy numeral character for 50.” Mr Pinkerton, the difeoverer of this, treats other medallifts with great afperity. Sa- vot and Hardouin are mentioned by name; the latter (he fays) is “ ignorant of common fenfe ;” and^iei- ther he nor Savot could explain it but by reading C back- i8 MED Ancunt backward ; pat the 4, for the Roman V, and thus ma- , Mor-e^ , king it xv. Other readings have been given by vari- OU3 medallifts, but none have hit upon the true one excepting our author, though the coin itfelf led to it; being juft three times the weight of that marked xx. We have likewife half the largeft coin, which is mark¬ ed xxx, and which weighs 26 grains; the fmalleft is only 17x5 the xxxx weighs 34; and the lx or drachma 53. There is alfo the didrachm of this coin- 69 age, of ic6 grains. Account of The aurei or Roman gold coins, were at firft 48 in the aurei. tbe pound; but they were afterwards diminilhed in number to 40, owing to an augmentation in the weight of each coin. In the time of Sylla, the aureus weigh¬ ed no lefs than from 164 to 168 grains, and there were only 30 in the pound; but fuch confufion in the coinage was introduced by that conqueror, that no perfon could know exaftly what he was worth. Till this time the aureus feems to have continued of the value of 30 filver denarii, about one pound fterling j for about that time it was enlarged a whole third, that it might ftill be equivalent to the full number of denarii. But after Sylla had taken Athens, and the arts and manners of Greece became obje&s of imita¬ tion to the Romans, the aureus fell to 40 in the pound, probably when Sylla had abdicated his dicfatorfliip. Thus, being reduced near to the fcale of the Greek Xpiot®*, it pafied for 20 denarii, as the latter did for as many drachmas, being in currency 133. 4d. fter¬ ling. “ This (fays Mr Pinkerton) is the more pro¬ bable, becaufe we know from Suetonius, that the great Caefar brought from Gaul fo much gold, that it fold for nine times its weight of filver: but the Gallic gold was of a very bafe fort.” In the time of Claudius, the aureus was valued at 100 feftertii, or 25 filver denarii, at which it conti¬ nued till the time of Heliogabalus, when it fell to about 02 grains at a medium, or rofe in number to 55 in the pound. In the reign of Philip, during which the city completed its thoufandth year, the aureus was coined of two or three fixes. Thefe are impreffed with a head of Rome on one fide, and various figures on the other; but the workmanlhip is fo rude, that they are fuppofed to have been ftruck in fome of the more uncivilized provinces of the empire. The praftice of having different gold coins, however, con¬ tinued under Valerian, Gallienus, and his fucceffors. In the time of Gallienus, they were of 30, 65, and 1 from 86 to 93 grains; the double aurei being from 172 to iSjx grains; but the aureus properly fo call¬ ed was from 86 to 93 ; thofe of 30 and 32 being the trie rites aurei of the Hijlor'ut Augujhz Scriptores ; while the larger, from 62 to 65, are to be accounted double trientes, and were perhaps called minuti aurei. The value of thefe different fizes of aurei is not known. Alteration That Aurelian made fome alteration in the coin is in the gold certain ; but Mr Pinkerton fuppofes it to have been coin made on]y tyie g0i(j . becaufe under him and his fucceffor Jianf'Ure" Probus, the common aureus was of 100 grains, a fize confined to thofe emperors: there are likevvife halves ef about 50 grains ; and double aurei, commonly of very fine workmanfhip, of upwards of 200 grains. In the time of Gallienus, the precious metal was fo common, that this emperor vied in magnificence with Nero and Heliogabalus. Aurelian, who plundered the A L S, Sea.V. rich city of Palmyra, and thus became mafter of the Ancient treafures of the eaft, obtained fuch a profufion of gold, Money, that he looked upon it to be produced by nature in 1 greater plenty than filver. It is remarkable, that du¬ ring this emperor’s reign there was a rebellion among the money-coiners, which could not be quelled but by the deftruftion of feveral thoufands; which Mr Pin¬ kerton aferibes to his having ordered the gold to be reftored to its former fize, but to go for no m^ire filver than it formerly did. “ So very little filver (fays he) occurs of this period, that it is plain no altera¬ tion in the filver produced the war with the money- ers : and in the brafs he made no change ; or if he had, it were ftrange that fuch commotions fiiould arife about fo trifling a metal. But if, as appears from the coins, he ordered the aureus, which had fallen to 80 grains, to be raifed to about 100, it is no wonder that the contra£tors (hould be in an uproar; for a whole quarter of their coinage, amounting as would feem to all their profits, was loft. Aurelian judged, that when he found gold fo common in the eaft, it was equally fo in the weft ; and that the moneyers muft have made a moft exorbitant profit ; but his ideas on this fubjeft were partial and unjuft : and after his fliort reign* which did not exceed five months after the alteration* the gold returned to its former courfe; though a few pieces occur of Aurelian’s ftandard, ftruck, as would feem, in the commencement of the reign of Probus his- fucceffor. From this time to that of Conftantine I. the aureus weighed between 70 and 80 grains; but in his reign it was changed for the folidus, of which fix went to the ounce of gold, which went for 14 milliarenfes, and 25 denarii as before; the value of filver being now to- gold as 14 to x. This new coin continued of the fame value to the final downfal of the Conftantinopo- litan empire; gold being always very plentiful in that city, though filver became more and more fcarce. The folidus was worth 12 s. fterling. Here again our am thor moft feverely criticifes Mr Clarke and Mr Raper: the former (he fays) with refpeft to the value of gold in the time of Conftantine I. “ has left all his fenfes behind him. In page 267. he abfurdly afferts, that 20 denarii went to the folidus in the time- of Theo-- dofius I. and proceeds with this deplorable error to the end of his work. He then tells us, that only «4 denarii went to the folidus under Conftantine I; &c.” To Mr Raper, however, he is a little more merciful, as he owns, that “ though he (Mr Raper) has ttrange- ly confounded the milliarenfis with the denarius, he has yet kept common fenfe for his guide.” Mr Pin¬ kerton argues, indeed with great probability, “ that had any change in the coinage taken place between, the time of Conftantine and Theodofius I. that is, in. lefs than 50 years, the laws of that period, which are all in the Theodoftan code, muft have noticed it.” To this and other arguments upon the fubjedf, Mr Pinkerton adds the following obfervation upon the va¬ lue of gold and filver: “ As a Hate advances to its height, gold i> icreafes in value ; and as a ftate declines, it decreafes, providing the metals are kept on a par as to purity. Hence we may argue, that gold decreafed in its relation to filver perhaps four or five centuries, fnrnilhed moft European kingdoms with gold in coin, which otherwife would, from their want of arts, and Ancitnt of intercourfe with the caff, then the grand feminary Money. 0f t]iat metal, have almoft been ignorant of what gold was. Thefe gold coins were called Bezants in Eu¬ rope, becaufe lent from Byzantium or Conftantinople; and were folidi of the old fcale, fix to the ounce In Byzantine writers, the folidus is alfo called nomlfma, or “ the coin cryjinos, becaufe of gold ; hyper per ns, from its being refined with fire, or from its being of bright gold flaming like'fire. The folidi alfo, as the aurei formerly, received names from the princes whofe portraits they bore ; as Michelati, Manuelati. Solidus is a term ufed alfo for the aureus by Apuleius, who lived in the time of Antoninus the Philofopher; nay, as early as in the Praetorian edicts of the time of Trajan. It was then a diitinftion from the femiflis or half In the time of Valerian, when aurei of different fizes had been introduced, it became neceffary to diftin- guiflr the particular aurei meant. Hence in the Im¬ perial Refcripts, publifhed by the HiJloriteAuguJltz Scrip- tores, Valerian ufes the term Philippeos nojlri vultvs, for the common aurei. Aurelian ufes the fame term au¬ rei Philippa, for the aurei winch he had reltored to their fize in fome degree. Gallienus ufes aurei Vale- riani for his father’s coins. Aurei Antoninuini are like- wife put by Valerian for coins of the early Antonini, of fuperior flandard to any then ufed. Divifinns of Jn the gohj coinage at Rome, the aureus was the aureus, ;nto four parts ; the femiffis of 60 fertertii ; the tremiflis, or t;>: d, of 40 ; the fourth, the name of which is not menthmed, of 30 ; and the fcrupulum of 20. But in a flrort time all of thefe fell into difufe, except the femiflis or half, which is extremely fcarce ; fo that it is probable that few have been ftruck. It is an erroneous opinion (according to Mr Pinkerton) that the femifiis was called a denarius aureus. The aureus itfelf indeed had this name ; but the name of qtlinarius is applied to the femiflis with greater proprie¬ ty than the former. Trientes, or tremiffes of gold, are found of Valerian and hisfon Gallienus, and weigh about 30 grains. Thofe of Salonina the wife of Gal¬ lienus weigh 33 grains. Under the Conftantinopo- litan empire, tremiffes again make their appearance ; and from the time of Valentinian downwards, the thirds are the moft common coins of gold, being worth about 4 s. flerling. The femiflis is likewife mention¬ ed, but none occur earlier than the time of Bafilifcus. The gold tremiflis was the pattern of the French and Spanifli gold coins ; as the filver denarius, in its dimi- nilhed Hate, was of the Gothic and Saxon penny. th^Roman ^ e c^°^e this account of the Roman money method of W1'th fome remarks concerning the mint, and method coining of coinage. This ay, fometimes the reverfe ; but among us it is renewed by puncheons, though with variations in the lettering or other minute ftrokes; while the ancients were forced to recur to another dye differently engraven. The Engravers of the dye were called ccelatores; other officers employed in the mint were the fpeQatores, expedatores, or nummularii. The melters were ftyled fufarii, Jlatuarii, and Jlaturarii; thofe who adjufted the weight were called aquatores mo- netarum ; thofe who put the pieces, into the dye fup- pcfitores, and thofe who ftruck them malleatores. At the head of each office was an officer named primke- rius, and the foreman was named optio et exaftor.” In order to aflift the high relief on the coins, the metal, after being melted and refined, was caft into bullets, as appears from the ancient coins not being cut or filed on the edges, but often cracked, and al¬ ways rough and unequal. Thefe bullets were then put into the dye, and received the impreffion by re¬ peated ftrokes of the hammer, though fometimes a machine appears to have bsei? ufed for this purpofe: for Boiterue informs us, that there was a pifture of the Roman mintage in a grotto near Baia>, where a machine was reprefented holding up a large (tone as if to let it fall fuddenly, and ftrike the coin at once. None of the ancient money was cafi in moulds, except- 20 MED Preferva- ing the moft ancient and very large Roman brafs, com- t t‘on* monly called weights, and other Italian pieces of that * fort; all the reft being mere forgeries of ancient and modern times. Some Roman moulds which have been found are a proof of this ; ami from thefe fome medal- lifts have erroneoufly imagined that the ancients firft call their money in moulds, and then (lamped it, in order to make the impreftion more clear and ftiarp. The ancients had fome knowledge of the method of crenating the edges of their coins, which they did by cutting out regular notches upon them; and ©f this kind we find fome of the Syrian and ancient con- fular coins, with a few others. The former were call in this lhape, and then ftruck; but, the latter were crenated by incifion, to prevent forgery, by (howing the infide of the metal: however, the ancient forgers alfo found out a method of imitating this; for Mr Pink¬ erton informs us, that he had a Roman confular coin, of which the incifions, like the reft, were plated with filver over the copper. Sect. VI. Of the Prefervation of Medals. We now come to confider what it is that diftin- guifties one medal from another, and why fome are fo * highly prized more than otheis. This, in general, befides its genuinenefs, confifts in the high degree of prefervation in which it is. This, by Mr Pinkerton, is called the confervation of medals, and is by him re¬ garded as good and as perfeQ. In this, he fays that a true judge is fo nice, that he will rejedt even the rareft coins if in the leaft defaced either in the figures or legend. Some, however, are obliged to content themfelves with thofe which are a little rubbed, while thofe of fuperior tafte and abilities have in their ca¬ binets only fuch as are in the very ftate in which they came from the mint; and fuch, he fays, are the ca¬ binets of Sir Robert Auftin, and Mr Walpole of Roman filver at Strawberryhill. It is abfolutely. ne- ceftary, however, that a coin be in what is called good prefervation ; which in the Greek or Roman empe¬ rors, and the colonial coins, is fuppofed to 6e when the legends can be read with fome difficulty; but when the confervation is perfedl, and the coin juft as it came from the mint, even the moft common coins are valuable. B-afs and ^ he fine ruft, like varnifh, which covers the fur- 'opper beft face of brafs and copper coins, is found to be the beft prcferved preferver of them ; and is brought on by lying in a (b£thc ruft certain kind of foil. Gold cannot be contaminated th«in.0VerS kut hy iron mold, which happens when the coin lies in a foil impregnated with iron; but filver is fufcep- tible of various kinds of ruft, principally green and ted; both of which yield to vinegar. In gold and filver.coins the ruft mull be removed,, as being preju¬ dicial ; but in brafs and copper it is prefervative and ornamental; a circumllance taken notice of by the ancients. “ This fine ruft (fays Mr Pinkerton), which is indeed a natural varniffi not imitable by the art of man, is fometimes a delicate blue, like that of a tur- quoife ; fometimes of a bronze brown, equal to that obfervable in ancient ftatues of bronze, and fo highly prized ; and fometimes of an exquifite green, a little on the azure hue, which laft is the moft beautiful of all. It js.alfo found of a fine purple, of ©live, and of a cream colour or pale yellow : which laft is exqui- A L s. Sea. V. fite, and (hows the impreffion to as much advantage Preferva- as paper of cream colour, ufed in all great foreign tlon' , preffes, does copperplates and -printing. The Neapo- ’ J litan patina (the ruft in queftion) is of a light green; and when free from excrefcence or blemiih is very beautiful. Sometimes the purple patina gleams thro’ an upper coat of another colour, with as fine effedt as a variegated filk or gem. In a few inftances a ruft of a deeper green is found ; and it is fometimes fpot- ted with the red or bronze (hade, which gives it quite the appearance of the Eaft Indian (lone called the bloodJlone. Thefe rufts are all, when the real product of time, as hard as the metal itfelf, and preferve it much better than any artificial varnifti could have done; concealing at the fame time not the moll minute par¬ ticle of the impreffion of the coin.” ^ The value of medals is lowered when any of the Meda's letters of the legend are mifplaced ; as a fufpicion of h?w forgery is thus induced. Such is the cafe with many"!llue m of thofe of Claudius Gothicus. The fame, or even greater, diminution in value takes place in fuch coins as have, not been well fixed in the dye, which has oc- cafioned their flipping under the ftrokes of the ham¬ mer, and thus made a double or triple image. Many coins of this kind are found in which the one fide is perfectly well-formed, but the other blundered in the manner juft mentioned. Another blemifti, but of fmaller moment, and which to fome may be rather a recommendation, is when the workmen through in¬ attention have put another coin into the dye without taking out the former. Thus the coin is convex on one fide, and concave on the other, having the fame figure upon both its fides. The medals faid by the judges in this fcience to be countermarhd are very rare, and highly valued. TheyniP(1aig_ jDifferent kin.'s of -tills i lift. Counter- highly valued. They have a fmall (lamp imprefied upon them, in fpme an head, in others a few letters, fuch as Aug : n. pro¬ bus, &c. which marks are fuppofed to imply an al¬ teration in the value of the coin; as was the cafe with the countermarked coins of Henry VIII. and Queen Mary of Scotland. Some have a .fmall hole through them; fometimes with a little ring faftened in it, having been ufed as ornaments; but this makes no altera¬ tion in their value. Neither is it any diminution in the value of a coin that it is fplit at the edges ; for coins of undoubted antiquity have often been found in this (late, the caufe of which has already been explained. On the contrary, this cracking is generally confidered as a great merit; but Mr Pinkerton fufpedts that one of thefe cracked coins has given rife to an error with refpeft to the wife of Carauiius who reigned for fome time in Britain. The infeription is read oriuna Aug : and there is a crack in the medal juft before the O of oriuna. Without this crack Mr Pinker¬ ton fuppofes that it would have been read Fortuna Aug. * . 5 Some particular foils have the property of giving ^ and filver a yellow colour as if it had been gilt. It natu-h°w rally acquires a black colour through time, which any tarntlh6d* fiulphureous vapour will bring on in a few minutes. From its being fo fufceptible of injuries, it was ab ways mixed by the ancients with much alloy, in or¬ der to harden it. Hence the impreffions of the ancient filver coins, remain perfeft to this day,, while thofe of modern coins are obliterated in a few years.. On this Sea.VL MED Preferva- account Mr Pinkerton expreffes a wirti, that modern ilates would allow a much greater proportion of alloy " , in their filver coin than they ufually do. As gold admits of no ruft except that from iron above mention¬ ed, the coins of this metal are generally in perfect confervation, and frefli as from the mint. How to To cleanfe gold coins from this ruft, it is beft to ctear.fc fteep them in aquafortis, which, though a verypower- them. ful folvent of other metals, has no effect upon gold. Silver may be cleanfed by fteeping for a day or two in vinegar, but'more efredtually by boiling in water with three paits of tartar and one of fea-fait; on both thefe metals, .however, the ruft is always in fpots, and never forms an entire incruftation as on brafs or copper. The coins of thefe two metals mu ft never be cleanfed, as they would thus be rendered full of fmall holes eaten by the ruft. Sometimes, however, they are found fo totally obfcured with ruft, that no¬ thing can be difcovered upon them ; in which cafe it is beft to clear them with a graver; but it may alfo be done by boiling them for 24 hours in water with three parts of tartar and one of alum ; not fea-faltas Why an- in fdver coins. ciei.t coins The high ftate of prefervation in which ancient are 'n ■|uth coii*s are ufually found, is thus accounted for by Mr ftltepf) re Hancarville. He obferves, that the chief reafon is feiva ioi). the cuftom of the ancients always to-bury one or more coins with their dead, in order to pay for their paf- fage over the river Styx. “ From Phidon of Argos (fays he) to Conftantine I. are 36 generations: and from Magna Graecia to the Euphrates, from Cyrene to the Euxine Sea, Grecian arts prevailed, and the inhabitants amounted to about 30,000,000. 'i here died therefore, in that time and region, not lefs than ten thoufand millions of people, all of whom had coins of one fort or other buried with them. The tombs were facred and untouched; and afterwards negle&ed, till modern curiofity or chance began to difelofe them. The urn of blavia Valentina, in Mr Towley’s capital collection, contained feven brafe coins of Antoninus Pius and Eleagabalus. . Such are generally black, from being burnt wdth the dead. The beft and freftr- eft coins were ufed on thefe occaftons from refpeCl. to the dead; and hence their fine confervation. At Sy- racufe a Ikeleton was found in a tomb, with a beauti¬ ful gold coin in its mouth; and innumerable otherin- ftances might be given, for hardly is a funeral urn found without coins. Other incidents alfo confpire to furnifh us with numbers of ancient coins, though the above-recited circumftance be the chief caufe of perfed confervation. In Sicily, the filver coins with the head of Prcferpine were found in fach numbers as to weigh 600 French livres or pounds. In the t6th century, 6o,coo Roman coins were found at Modena, thought to be a military cheft hid after the battle of Bedriacum, when Otho was defeated by Vi- tellius. Near Brett, in the year 176c, between 20 and 30,000 Roman coins were found. A treafure of gold coins of LyftmacLus was found at Deva on the Marus; and Strabo, lib. vii. and Paufan in Jlttic. tell that be was defeated by the Getae ; at which time 77 this treafure feems to-have fallen into their hands.” Number of Thus Mr. Pinkerton, from the authority of Mr ancient Hancarville and others : but confidering thefe vaft com*. numbers of coins found in various places, it feems fur- s. 2T prifing how fo few fhould now remain in the cabinets H<.w to dfc. of the curious, as the fame author informs us that the whole of the different ancient coins known to us co.jrrer- amount only to about 80,000, though he owns that feits. the calculation cannot be efteemed accurate. ....-v.-.*w SeCl. VII. H'jV) to dijlivginjh true Medals from counterfeits. Thi- moft difficult and the moft important thing in the whole fcience of medals is the method of dif- tinguifliing thfc true from the counterfeit. The value put upon ancient coins made the forgery of them al- moft coeval with the feience itfelf; and as no laws in- fii£t a punifliment upon fuch forgers, men of great genius and abilities have undertaken the trade: but whether to the real detriment of the fcience or not, is a matter of fome doubt; for if only exadl copies of genuine medals are fold for the originals, the impofi- tion may be deemed trifling : but the cafe muft be ac¬ counted very different, if people take it upon them to forge medals w’hich never exifted. At firlt the for¬ geries were extremely grofs ; and medals were forged of Priam, of Ariftotle, Artemifia, Hannibal, and moft of the other illuftrious perfonages of antiquity. Moft of thefe w'ere done in fuch a manner, that the fraud could eafily be difcovered ; but others have impofed even upon very learned men. Mr Pinkerton mentions a remarkable medal of the emperor Heraclius, repre- fenting him in a chariot on the reverfe, with Greek and Latin inferiptions, which Jofeph Scaliger and Lipfius imagined to have been ftruck in his own time,, but which was certainly iffued in Italy in the 15th century. i“ Other learned men (fays our author) have been ftrangely milled, when fpeaking of coins; for to he learned in one fubjedf excludes not grofs ignorance in others. Budaeus, de Affe, quotes a denarius of Cieero, m. toll. Erafmus, in one of his Epiftles, tells us with great gravity, that the gold coin of Brutus, itryck in Thrace, xosns', bears the patriarch Noah coming out of the ark with his two fons, and takes the Roman eagle for the dove with the olive branch. Winkelman, in his letters, informs us, that the fmall brafs piece with Virgil’s head, reverfe f.po, is undoubtedly ancient Roman ; and adds, that no knowledge of coins can be had out of Rome: but Winkelman, fo converfant in ftatues, knew nothing of coins. It is from other artifts and other produc¬ tions that any danger of deceit arifes. And there is no wonder that even the Ikilful are milled by fuch cirlifts as have ufed this trade for among them appear go the names of Viffor Gambello, Giovani del. Cavino, Coins fir- called the Papuan, and his fon Aleffandro Baffiano,f'e'! b>' e!S' likewife of Padua, Benvenuto Cellini, Alcffandro^^nt ar* Greco, Leo Aretino, Jacobo da' Erezzo, Eederigo Bonzagna, and Giovani Jacopo, his brother ; Sebaf- tiano Plumbo, Valerio de Vicenza, Gorljeus a-Ger¬ man, Carteron of Holland, and others, all .or-moft of them of the 16th century ;. and Cavino the Paduan, who is the moft famous, lived m the middle of that century. The forgeries of- Cavino are held in no little efteem, being of wonderful exe¬ cution. His and thofe of Carteron are the moft nu¬ merous, many of the other artifts here mentioned not having forged above two or three coins. Later forgers were • 22 MED How t<-> rh- were Dervieu of Florence \vlio confined himfelf to true^rom me^a^'ons> a;1d Cogornier who gave coins of the 30 counter- ty,a'nts in fmall brats. The chief part of the forgeries frits. of Greek medals which have come to my knowledge --v are of the firft mentioned, and a very grofs kind, repre- fenting perfons who could never appear upon coin, fuch as Priam, ^Eneas, Plato, Alcibiades, Artemi- iia, and others. The real Greek coins were very little known or valued till the works of Goltzius appeared, which were happily pofterior to the tera of the grand forgers. Why later forgers have feldom thought of counterfeiting them cannot catily be accounted for, if it is not owing to the mafterly workmanthip of the ori¬ ginals, which fets all imitation at defiance. Forgeries, however, of moil ancient coins may be met with, and Sj of the Gre6k among the reft. Romun hr- “ The forgeries are more confpicuous among the Ro- gerxs more man medals than any other kind of coins; but we are than Gvteknot t0 uPon tbefe as the work of modern outs. artifts. On the contrary, we are affured that many of them were fabricated in the times of the Romans themfelves, fome of them being even held in more ef- timation than the genuine coins themfelves, on account of their being plated, and otherwife executed in a manner to which modern forgers could never attain. Even the ancients held fome of thefe counterfeits in fuch eftimation, that Pliny informs us there were fre¬ quently many true denarii given for one falfe one."— Caracalla is faid to have coined money of copper and lead plated with filver ; and plated coins, the work of ancient forgers, occur of many Greek cities and princes ; nay, there are even forgeries of barbaric coins. “ Some Roman coins (fays Mr Pinkerton) are found of iron or lead plated with brafs, perhaps trials of the fkill of the forger. Iron is the moft com¬ mon ; but one decuriio of Nero is known of lead plated with copper. Neumann juitly obferves, that no hif- toric faith can be put in plated coins, and that moft faulty reveries, &c arife from plated coins not being $2 noticed as fuch. Even of the Roman confular coins Denarms of not very many have ever been forged. The celebrated rutus. hlver denarius of Brutus, with the cap of liberty and two daggers, is the chief inftance of a confular coin of which a counterfeit is known. But it is cafdy . re¬ jected by this mark : in the true coin the cap of liber¬ ty is below the guard or hilt of the daggers ; in the 83 falfe, the top of it rifes above that hilt.” medals^ ^ *mPer'a^ feries medals is the grand ebjeCl of modern medallic forgeries ; and the deception was at firft extended to the moft eminent writers upon the fubjeCt. The counterfeits are by Mr Pinkerton di¬ vided into fix claffes: I. Such as are known to be imitations, but valued on account of the artilfs by which they are executed. In this clafs the medals of the Paduan rank higheft; the others being fo numerous, that a complete feries of imperial medals of almoft every kind, nay almoft of every medallion, may he formed from among them. In France, particularly, by far the greater part of the ca¬ binets are filled with counterfeits of this kind. They are diitinguiftied from fuch as are genuine by the fol¬ lowing marks : x. The counterfeits are almoft uni- verfally thinner. 2. They are never worn nor damaged. 3. The letters are modern. 4. They are either defti- tute of varniih entirely, or have a falfe one, which is a l s. Sea. vir. eafily known by its being black, finning, and greafy, How to di- and very eafily hurt with the touch of a needle, while the varnifh of ancient medals is as hard as the metal co,,nt»r- itfelf. In'lead of the greafy black varnifh above feits. mentioned, indeed, they have fometimes a light green -y——J one, fpotted with a kind of iron marks, and is com- pofed of fulphur, verdigreafe, and vinegar. It may frequently be diftinguiftied by the hairftrokes of the pencil with which it was laid on being vifibl.e upon it. 5. The fides are either filed or too much fmoothed by art, or bear the marks of a fmall hammer 6. The counterfeits are always exaftly circular, which is not the cafe with ancient medals, efpecially after the time of Trajan. 84 The Paduan forgeries may be diftinguifhed from Paie phur, the grey is made of chalk fteeped in urine, the coin being left for fome days in the mixture. The ruf- fet is next to the natural, by reafon of its being a kind of froth which the fire forces from ancient coins ; but when falfe, it ftiines too much. To make it they frequently took the large brafs coins of the Ptolemies, which were often corroded, and made them red hot in the fire; put the coins upon them, and a fine patina adhered. Our author does not fay in what manner the iron-covered patina was made. “ Sometimes (adds he) they take an old defaced coin, covered with real patina, and itamp it anew ; but the patina is then too bright in the cavities, and too dull in the protu¬ berances. The trial of brafs corns with the tongue is not to be defpifed ; for if modern the patina taftes bitter or pungent, while if ancient it is quite tafte- lefs.” Mr Pinkerton informs us, that all medallions from Julius Caefar to Adrian are much to be iufpe&ed of forgery ; the true medals of the firft 14 emperors he* Sefl.Vir. MED How to di- ing exceedingly valuable, and to be found only in the ftin^uifii cabinets of princes. ^ounterm The fecond clafs of counterfeit medals contains feits. thofe caft from moulds taken from the Paduan forge- u—- ries, and others done by eminent mafters. Thefe are 8? fomeiimes more difficult to be difcovered than the for- fron^the^mer’ fiecaufe in calling them they can give any degree Paduan for- of thicknefs they pleafe ; and, filling the fmail fand- gcries* holes with mallic, they retouch the letters with a gra¬ ver, and cover the whole with varnifli. The inltruc- tions already given for the former clafs, however, are alfo ufeful for thofe of the fecond, with this addition, that medals of this clafs are generally Ughter than the genuine, becaufe fire rarefies the metal in fome degree, while that which is ftruck is rather condenfed by the ftrokes. In gold and filver medals there cannot be any deception of this kind ; becaufe thefe metals ad¬ mit not of patina, and confequently the varnifh be¬ trays the impofition. The marks of the file on the margin of thofe of the fecond clafs are a certain fign of forgery ; though thefe do not always indicate the forgery to be of modern date, becaufe the Romans often filed the edges of coins to accommodate them to the purpofes of ornament, as quarter guineas are fome- times put into the bottom of punch laddies. It is com¬ mon to imitate the holes of medals made by time by means of aqua-fortis; but this deftroys the fides of a coin more effeclually than if it had been eat into na¬ turally. The fraud, however, is not eafily diftin- guifhed. *8 III. Medals cajl in moulds from an antique.—In this Mstlals caft mode fome forgers, as Beauvais informs us, have been f om anan-jf0 very careful, that they would melt a common me- *,^ue’ dal of the emperor whom they meant to counterfeit, left the quality of the metal ftiould betray them. “ This (fays^Mr Pinkerton) has been done in the fil¬ ver Septimius Severus, with the reverfe of a trium¬ phal arch, for which a common coin of the fame prince has been melted ; and in other inftances. Putting me¬ tals in the fire or upon hot iron to cleanfe them, gives them an appearance of being caft ; for fome fpots of the metal being fofter than the reft will run, which makes this one of the worft methods of cleaning medals — The directions given for difcovering the two former deceptions hold good alfo in this. IV. Ancient medals retouched and altered.—This is a clafs of counterfeits more difficult to be difcovered than any other. “ The art (fays Mr Pinkerton) ex¬ erted in this clafs is aftonifhing ; and a connoiffeur is the lei's apt to fufpect it, becaufe the coins themfelves are in faeen a^reac^y remarked, that many true medals are dais &c. * cracked in the edges ; owing to the repeated ftrokes of the hammer, and the little degree of ductility which the metal pofieffes. This the forgers attempt to imi¬ tate by a tile ; but it is eafy to diliinguifh betwixt the natural and artificial cleft by means of a fmall needle. The natural cleft is wide at the extremity, and appears to have a kind of almoft imperceptible filaments ; the edges of the crack correfponding with each other in a manner which no art can imitate. The plated medals which have been forged in an¬ cient times were long fuppofed to be capable of refill¬ ing every effort of modern imitation; but of late years, “ fome ingenious rogues (fays Mr Pinkerton) thought of piercing falfe medals of filver with a red hot needle, which gave a blacknefs to the infide of the coin, and made it appear plated to an injudicious eye. This fraud is eafily diitinguilhed by feraping the infide of the metal.” It is, however, very difficult to diftinguilh the forgeries of rude money when not caff; and our author gives no other direction than to confult \ ikilful medallift./ Indeed, notwithllanding all the di¬ rections already given, this feems to be a refource w hich cannot by any means with fafety be neglected. - ' real and practical knowledge of coins “ is only to be acquired (fays he; by feeing a great number, and . jg comparing the forged with the genuine. It cannot iais. therefore be too much recommended to the young connoiffeur, who wiffies to acquire fome knowledge in this way, to vifit all the fales and cabinets he can, and to look upon all ancient medals with a very microfco- pic eye. By thefe means only is to be acquired that ready knowledge which enables at firft glance to pro¬ nounce upon a forgery, however ingenious. Nor let the feience of medals be from this concluded to be un¬ certain ; for no knowledge is more certain and imme¬ diate, when it is properly fludied by examination of the real objefls. A man who buys coins, trailing merely to his theoretic perufal of medallic books, will find himfelf woefully miilaken. He ought to iludy coins firft, where only they can be iludied, in them- felves. Nor can it be matter of wonder or implica¬ tion of caprice, that a medallift of ikill ffiould at one perception pronounce upon the veracity or falfehood of a medal; for the powers of the human eye, em¬ ployed in certain lines of fcience, are amazing. Hence a ftudent can diftinguiffi a book among a thoufand fi- milar, and quite alike to every other eye: hence a ffiepherd can difeern, &c.: hence the medalliil can Forgeries ^aY an inftant, ‘ this is a true coin, and this is a a£ modern falfe,’ though to other people no diltinflion be percep- coins. tible.” Forgeries of modern coins and medals, Mr Pinker¬ ton obfer.ves, are almofl as numerous as of the ancient. The fatync coin of LouisXII. Perdam Babylonis nomen, is a remarkable inftance: the falfe coin islaraer than the true, and bears date 1512. The rude coins of the middle ages are very eafily forged, and forgeries have accordingly become common. Forged coins of Alfred and other early princes of England have ap- N°20I. a I. s. Sea. VIII. peared, fome of which have been done with great art, “ The two noted Engliffi pennies of Rich. I. fays our author, are of this flamp ; and yet have impofed upon Meffrs Folkes and Snelling, who have publiffied them as genuine in the two bell books upon Englifti coins. But they were fabricated by the late Mr White of Newgace-ftreet, a noted collector, who contaminated an otherwife fair charadler by fuck practices. Such forgeries, though eafy, require a Ikill in the hiftory and coinage of the times which luckily can hardly fall to the lot of a common Jew or mechanic forger. But the practice is deteftable, were no gain propofed: and they who ftoop to it muft fuppofe, that to embarraft; the path of any fcience with forgery and futility, im¬ plies no infamy. In forgeries of ancient coin, the fiflion is perhaps fufficiently atoned for by the vaft Ikill required; and the artift may plaufibly allege, that his attention was not to deceive, but to excite his ut- moft powders, by an attempt to rival the ancient ma- fters. But no poffible apology can be made for for¬ ging the rude money of more modern times. The crime is certainly greater than that which leads the common coiner to the gallows; inafmuch as it is com¬ mitted with more eafe, and the profit is incomparably larger.” Value. Sect.VIII. Of the Value of Medals. Alb ancient coins and medals, though equally ge¬ nuine, are not equally valuable. In medals, as well as in every thing elfe, the fcarcity of a coin ftamps a value upon it which cannot otherwife be derived from its intrinfic worth. There are four or five degrees of rarity reckoned up; the highefl of which is called unique. The caufe is generally aferibed to the few- nefs of number thrown off originally, or to their having been called in, and recoined in another farm. To the former caufe Mr Pinkerton aferibes the fcarcity af the copper of Otho and the gold of Pefcennius Niger; to the latter that of the coinage of Caligula: “ though this laft (fays he) is not of Angular rarity; which (hows that even the power of the Roman fenate could not annihilate an eftabliffied money; and that the firft caufe of rarity, arifing from the fmall quantity originally ftruck, ought to be regarded as the principal.” ^ In the ancient cities Mr Pinkerton aferibes the fear-Caufes of city of coin to the poverty or fmallnefs of the ftate;t}le Scarcity but the fcarcity of ancient regal and imperial coins arifes principally from the ffiortnefs of the reign; and titles, fometimes from the fuperabundance of money be¬ fore, which rendered it almoft unneceffary to coin any money during the reign of the prince. An example of this we have in the fcarcity of the (hillings of George III. which (hows that (hortnefs of reign does not always occafion a fcarcity of coin ; and thus the coins of Harold II. who did not reign a year, are veiy numerous, while thofe of Richard I. who reigiv ed ten, are almoft unique. Sometimes the rarelt coins lofe their value, and be¬ come common. This our author aferibes to the high price given for them, which tempts the poffeffors to j bring them to market ; but chiefly to the difeovering of hoards of them. The former caufe took place with Queen Anne’s farthings, fome of which formerly fold at five guineas; nay, if we could believe the newfpa- pers, Sea. IX. MED ■vcrfii. , 95 Silver co in what Value, petr, one of tKrm was fome years ago fold for 9601. the latter with the coins of Canute, the Danilh king Rare coin* England ; which were very rare till a hoard of them Tometimes was difeovered ih the Orkneys. As difeoverifis of become this kind, however, produce a temporary plenty, fo when they are difperfed the former fcarcity returns *, while on the other hand fome of the common coins become rare through the mere circumllance of ne- As doable the number of copper-coins of Greek in what c‘t'es ^ to met w^h that there ire of filver* the cafe's ir.oft ^atter are rtf confeqnence much more ellcemed: but eheemed. the reveVfe is the cafe with tliofe of the Greek princes. All the Greek civic coins of filver are very rare ex¬ cepting thofe of Athens, Gorinth, Meffana, Dyrrha- chium, MafTilia, Syracufe, and fortie others. Of the 'Greek monarchic coins, the moft rire are the tetfa- drachms of the kings of Syria, the Ptolemies, the fo- vereigns of Macedon and Bithynii, excepting thofe of Alexander the Great and Lyfimachus. Thofe of the kings of Cappadocia are of a fmall fize, and fcarce to be met with. Of thofe of Numidia and Mauritania, the coins of Juba the father are common ; but thofe of the fon and nephew Ptolemy fcarce. Coins of the kings of Sicily, Pirthia, arid Judfca* are fate 5 the laft very milch fb-. We meet with no coins of the kings of Arabia and Comagene except in brafs: thofe of the kings of Bofphorus are in eleftrum* and a few in brafs, but all of them rare; as are likewife thdfe of Philetenis king of Pergamus and of the kings of Pontus. In the year 1777, a coin of Mithndates fold for L. 26, Didrachms of all kings and cities are fcarce excepting thdfe bf Corinth and her colonies! but the gold Coins of Philip of Macedoii, Aiekander the Great, and Lyfimachusy as has already been ob- ferved, are common The ftlver tetradfaehms of all kings bear a Very high price. The didrachm of Alex¬ ander the Great is one of the fcarceft of the fmaller Greek filver coins; fome of the other princes are not uncommom 96 In moft cafes the copper mrifiey of the Greek mo- teTcoins0*1"narc^3 ‘s fcarce ; blit that of Hieto I. of Syracufe is Uncommonly plenty, as Well as that of feVefal of the Ptolemies. Roman con- ^ ™°ft rare the confular Roman coins are thofe fular coitis. teftored by Trajan : of the others the gold confular coins ate the moft rare, and the fdvet the moft com¬ mon; excepting the cbift of Brfttus with the cap of Liberty already mentioned, with fome others. Some of the Rbtna'n imperial Coins are Very fcarce; particu¬ larly thofe of Otho in brafs; nor indeed dbes he occut at all on any coin ftruck at Rome *, blit the reafon of this may with great probability be fuppofed to have been the fhortneis of his feign. His portrait upon the brafs coins of Egypt and Antioch is very bad ; as Well as almoft all the other imperial coins of Greek cities. The heft iikenefs is on iiis gold and filver coins ; the litter of which are very common. The Greek and Egyptian coins are all of fmall or middling fizes, and have reverfes of various kinds: thofe of An¬ tioch have Latin legends, as well as moft of the other i mperial coins of A ntioch. They have no other reverfc but the BC in a wreath ; excepting in one inftance or two of the large and middle brafs, where the inferip- tions are in Greek. Latin coins of Otho in brafs, VOL.XI. Parti. A L 5. 25 with figures on the reverfe, are certainly falfe; though Value, in the cabinet of D’Ennery at Paris there was art ' Otho in middle brafs reftored by Titus, which was efteemed genuine by connoilfeurs. ^ The leaden corns of Rome are very fcarce: MoftLeaiitn Ro-* of them are pieces ftruck or call on occafion of the man coin*, fatumalia; others are tickets for feftivals and exhi¬ bitions; both private and publia The commoa tickets for theatres were made of lead, is were the contorniati', perpetual tickets, like the Englilh filver tickets for the opera. Leaden medallions are alfb found below the foundations of pillars and other public buildings, in order to perpetuate the memory of the founders. From the time of Auguftus alfo we find that leaden feals Were ufed. The work of Ticorini upon this fubjett, Intitled Piomli Antiochi, is much re¬ commended by Mr Pinketton. The Roman coins, which have beeri blundered in of coin* the manner formerly mentioned, rtne very rare, arid un- jw n Wed defervedly valued by the connoiffeurs. The blundersl;: '^eniint- iri the legends of thefe coins, which in all probability a8e‘ are the mere effe&s of accident, have been fo far mi- ftaken by Tome medalliftsy that they have given rife td imaginary emperors who never exifted. A coiri of Fatiftina, which has on the reverfe sousti. s. c. puzzled all the German antiquaries, till at laft Klotz gave it the following facetious interpretation : Sine omni utibtate fedamini tantas ineptias. too The heptarchic coins of England art generally rare Hepta’-chift except thofe calledyfyetfr, which are verycommon, as well coin= as thofe of Burgred king of Merciai The coins of Al-E‘ 8‘ai' * fred w'hich bear his bull are fcarce, and his other mo¬ ney much more fo. Tliofe of Hardyknute are fo rare, that it was even denied that they had an exift- ence; but Mr Pinkerton informs us, that there are three in the Britilh mufeum, upon all of which the name harthcanut is quite legible. No Englilh coins of King John are to be met with; tho’ there are fome Irilh ones j and only Fferich coins of Richard I. “ Leake (fays Mr Pinkerton) made a ftrartge blunder in aferibing coin's of different kings with two faces, and otherwife fpoiled in the ftamping, to this prince ; in w'hich, as ufual, he has been followed by a mified number.” icr Coins of Alexander II. of Scotland are rather fcarce, ScMtifll but ‘thofe of Alexander III. are more plentiful. Thofe cchis. of John Baliol are fare, and none of Edward Baliol to be found. Sect. IX. Of the Purchafe of Medals. Medaus are to be had at the Tho'ps of goldfmiths and filveffmiths, with thofe Who deal ih curipfities; &c. but in great cities there are profeffed dealers in them. The heft method of ptirchafing medals, how¬ ever, is that of’buyirfg Whole cabinets, which are every year expdfed to auction at London. Iri thefe the rare medals are fold by themfelves; but the common ones are put up in large lots, fo that the dealers commonly prtrehafe them. Mr Pinkerton thinks it would be better that medals were fold one by orie ; becaufc A lot is often valued and prtrehafed for the fake .of a fingle coin ; while the others feparately wotild fell fof perhaps four times the price of the w’hole lot. “ If any man of common fenfe and honefty ( fays Mr Piri- D kcn«j •f Car¬ thage, &c. Spreek cop. |>er coins. Cold coins of Philip and Alexan¬ der. ic6 Creek cop¬ per coins more rare than the jsiver. MED kerton) were to take up the trade of felling coins in London, he would make a fortune in a fhort time. This profitable bufinefs is now in the hands of one or two dealers, who ruin their own interefl by making an elegant ftudy a trade of knavery and impofition. If they buy 300 coins for 10s. they vviil aik 3s. for one of the work of them! nay, fell forged coins as true to the ignorant. The fimpletons complain of want of bufinefs. A knave is always a fool.” The gold coins of Carthage, Cyrene, and Syracufe, are worth about twice their intriniic value as metal; but the other gold civic coins from 5I. to 30I. each. The only gold coins of Athens certainly known to exift are two lately procured by the king. One of thefe remains in pofleffion of his majefty, but the other was given by' the queen to Dr Hunter. There was another in the Britifli mufeum, but fufpe&ed not to be genuine. Dr Hunter’s coin, then, if fold, would bear the higheft price that could be expedted for a coin. . The filver coins of SyrScufe, Dyrrhachium, Maffi- lia, Athens, and a few other ftates, are common; the drachmas and coins of leffer fize are worth’ about five fliillings ; the didrachms, tetradrachms, &c. from five to ten, according to their fize and beauty; the largeft, as -might naturally be expedted, being more valuable than the fmall ones. The tetradrachms, when of cities whofe coins are common, are worth from 7 s. 6d. to il. is. but it is impoffible to put a value upon the rare civic coins ; ten guineas have been given for a fingle one. The Greek copper coins are common, and are al- moft all of that kind called [mall Irafs; the middle fize being fcarce, and the largeft in the ages prior to the Roman emperors extremely fo. The common Greek coins of brafs bring from 3d. to 18d. according to their prefervation; but when of cities, whofe coins are rare, much higher prices are given. “ The want of a few cities, however (fays Mr Pinkerton), is not thought to injure a colkdtion ; as indeed new names are dif- covered every dozen of years, fo that no aflbrtment can be perfedt. To this it is owing that the rarity of the Grecian civic coins is not much attended to.” The gold coins of Philip and Alexander the Great being very common, bear but from five to ten /hillings .above their intrinfic value; but thofe. of the other- princes, being rare, fell from 31. to 30I. each, or even more. The tetradrachms are the deareft of the filver mo¬ narchic money, felling from five to ten (hillings; and if very rare, from 3I. to 30I. Half thefe prices may be obtained for the drachmas, and the other denomi¬ nations in proportion. The Greek copper coins are for the moft part fcar- cer than the filver, except the Syro-Grecian, which are common, and almoft all of the fize called fmall brafs. “They ought (fays:Mr Pinkerton) to bear a a high price ; but the metal and fimilarity to the cop¬ per civic coins, which are common, keep their adtual piirchafe moderate, if the feller is not well inftrudted, and the buyer able and willing to pay the price of rarity.”’ The name of weights given to the ancient Roman a£es is, according to our author, exceedingly impro¬ per y as. that people had weights of lead and brafs A L S. Sea.IX. (ides, without the leaft appearance of a portrait upon'Purchafe. them. Thefe denote the weight by a certain number ^ f of knobs ; and have likewife fmall fleunttes engraved upon them. According to Mr Pinkerton, whenever we meet with a piece of metal (lamped on both (ides with bufts and figures, we may lay it down as a certain rule that it is a coin ; but when (lightly ornamented and marked upon one fide only, we may with equal certainty conclude it to be a weight. _ ■ The ancient Roman afes are worth from 2s. to 2I. p[.;Cj.0f the according to the (ingularity of their devices. Confu-ancient K.o* lar gold coins are worth from il. to 5I. Pompey withman alcs* hisfons 211. and the two Bruti 25I. The filver coins are univerfally worth from a (hilling to half a crown, excepting that of the cap of Liberty and a few others, which if genuine will bring from 10 s. to 5I. The confular copper bears an equal price with the filver, but is more rare ; the confular filver coins reltored by Trajan are worth 20$. each. With regard to the Roman imperial coins, it is to be obferved, that fome of thofe which belong to princes whofe coins are numerous, may yet be ren¬ dered extremely valuable by uncommon reverfes. Mr Pinkerton particularly points out that of Auguftus, with the legend-C. Marius Trogvs, which is worth three guineas, though the filver coins of that prince in general are not worth above a (hilling. In like manner, the common g<5ld coins of Trajan are not worth above twenty (hillings, .while thofe with Bafrii- ca Ulpia, Forum Trajani, Dlvi Nerva et Fraj anus ■, Patery D'vvi Nerva et Platina Aug. Profeclio Aug. Regna AJJignata, Rex Par thus, and fome others, bear from three to fix pounds. The ticket medals belong to the Roman Senate, and are worth from three to ten (hillings. The forged coins and medallions of the Paduan fell from one to three (hillings each. ioS Of the coins of other nations, thofe of Hilderic Barbaric king of the Vandals are in filver, and worth 10 s.; coins, the fmall brafs of Athanaric, 5 s. ;.the gold of Theo- doric 2 1.; the fecond brafs of Theodahat 5 s. ; the fecond brafs of Badueta rare, and worth 1 o s.; the third brafs, 3 s. The Britilh coins are very rare, and worth from ten (hillings to -two guineas each, fome- times much more.- Medals with unknown characters are always fcarce and dear. Saxon pennies of the heptarchy are rare, and worth from ten (hillings to ten pounds, according to their fcarcity and preferva¬ tion. The coins of the Englifir kings are common ; thofe of Edward the Confeffor, in particular; others are rare, and worth from ten (hillings to two guineas, while two of Har4yknute are worth no lefs than ten guineas. The gold'medals of Henry, in 1545, and the coronation of Edward, are worth 201. each : the Mary of Trezzo, 3 1. ; Simon’s head of Thurloe in gold is worth 121. ; his oval medal in gold upon Blake’s naval victory at fea is worth 30 1. ; and «his trial piece, if brought to a fale, would, in Mr Pinker¬ ton’s opinion, bring a (till higher price. The medals of Queen Anne, which are intrinfically worth about two guineas and a half, fell for about 3 1. each ; the filver, of the fize of a croa n piece, fell for 10 s. and the copper from five to ten (hillings. Dalfier’s copper pieces fell from tv o to five (hillings, and a few bear a. higher price. The Scpttilh gold coins fell higher than the. Eng?. lift*- Sed. x: , ‘ MEDALS. 27 Arrange- lift, but the others are on a par. The ftilling of an infallible mark of foyerefgn poorer. In the Roman Arrange¬ ment, &c. Mary with the baft, is rare, and fells for no lefs than confular coins it is feen in conjun&ion with Numa and me! t’ 30 L; the half 3 1.; and the royal 5 1. 5 s. The Ancus, but never afterwards till the time of Uciniue, Gold°coin« French teftoon of Francis and Mary brings 10I. 10 s. the colleague of Conftantine. Dioclefian, indeed, ac* of Scotland and the Scottift one of Mary and Henry would bring cording to Mr Gibbon, firft wore the diadem, but hi> 501. as would alfo the medal of James IV. The co- portrait upon coins is never adorned with it. So ronation medal of Francis and Mary is worth 201. great an averfipn had the Romans to kingly power, BrioFs coronation medal fold in 1755 only for two that they rather allowed their emperors to affume the guineas at Dr Mead’s fale ; but would now bring 20I. radiated crown, the fymbol of divinity, than to wear a if fold according to rarity. diadem ; but after the time of Condantine it becomes no The Englift coins ftruck in Ireland are of much the common. The radiated crown appears firft on the fengl-fti fame price with thofe of the native country ; but the pofthumous coins of Auguftus as a mark of deifica- St Patrick’s halfpence and farthings are rather fcarce, tion, but in fomewhat more than a century became Ui S and the rare crown of white metal is worth 41. The common. gun-money of James 11. and all other Irifli coins are very common. Se6l. X. Arrangement of Medals, ■with the In- Jlruftion to be derived from them. felcm nf fovereign authority. The laurel crown, at firft a badge of conqueft, was afterwards permitted by the fenate to be worn by Ju¬ lius Csefar, in order to hide the baldnefs of his head. From him all the emperors appear with it on their medals, even to our own, times. In the lower empire the crown is fometimes held by a hand above the head. Having thus given a full account of every thing in as a mark of piety. Befides thefe, the naval, mural, general relative to medals, we muft now come to fome and civic crowns, appear on the medals bot-h of empe- particulars refpe&ing their arrangement, and the enter- rors and other eminent men, to denote their great ac- tainment which a medallift may expeft from the trouble tions. The laurel crown is alfo fometimes worn by and expence he is at in making a collection. the Greek princes. The Arfacidas of Parthia wear It has already been obferved, that one of the prin- a kind of faft round the head, with their hair in rows cipal ufes of medals is the elucidation of ancient hif- of curls like a wig. The Armenian kings have the tory. Hence the arrangement -of his medals is the tiara, a kind of cap which was efteemed the badge of firft thing that muft occur in the formation of a cabi- imperial power in the eaft. Conical caps are feen on net. The moft ancient medals with which we are ac- the medals of Xerxes, a petty piirice of Armenia, quainted are thofe of Alexander 1. of Macedon, who and Juba the father, the former having a diadem began to reign about 501 years before Chrift. The around it. m feries ought of confequence to begin w ith him, and to The impious vanity of Alexander and his fucceftbrs Symbols be fucceeded by the medals cf Sicily, Caria, Cyprus, in affuming divine honours is manifeft on their medals, d,vin>ty on Heraclia, and Pbntus. Then follow Egypt, Syria, where various fymbols of divinity are met with. Some ^ the Cimmerian Bofphorus, Thrace, Bithynia, Par- of them have an horn behind their ear, either to de- and j,;s thia, Armenia, Damafcus, Cappadocia, Paphlagonia, note their ftrength, or that they were the fucceffors of ceffors. Pergamus, Galatia, Cilicia, Sparta, Pasonia, Epirus, Alexander, to whom this badge might be applied as Illyricum, Gaul, and the Alps, including the fpace of the fon of Jupiter Ammon. This, howrever, Mr time from Alexander the Great to the birth of Chrift, Pinkerton obferves, is the only one of. thefe fymbols and w'hich is to be accounted-the third medallic feries which certainly denotes an earthly fovereign, it being of ancient monarchs. The laft'feries goes down to doubted whether the reft are not all figures of gods.—. the fourth century, including fome of the monarchs According to Eckhet, even the horn and diadem be-^ of Thrace, Bofphorus, and Parthia, with thofe of long to Bacchus, who invented the latter to cure his Comagene, Edefla or Ofrhoene, Mauritania, and headachs ; and, according to the fame author, the. Judsea. A moft diftinft feries is formed by the Ro- only monarch who appears on coins with the horn is man emperors, from Julius Casfar to the deftruftion Lyiimachus. We are informed, however, by Plutarch, of Rome by the Goths; nay for a much longer pe- that Pyrrhus had a creft of goats horns to his helmet i riod, were it not that towards the latter part of it. and the goat we know was a fymbol of Macedon. the coins become fo barbarous as to deftroy the beau- Perhaps the fucceflbrs of Alexander wore this badge ty of the colleftion. Many feries may be formed of the horn in confequence. The helmet likewife fre- of modern potentates. quently appears on.the heads of fovereigns, and Con- By means of medals we can with great certainty ftantine I. has helmets of various forms curioufly or- determine the' various ornaments worn by ancient namented. princes as badges of diftindtion. The Grecian kings The diadem is w’orn by moft of the Greek queens, by ;; have generally the diadem, without any other orna- Orodaltis, .daughter of Lycomedes, king of Bithynia .; . ment; and though in general the fide of the face is and though the Roman emprefies never appear with prefented to view, yet in fome very ancient Greek and it, yet this is more than compenfated by the variety of Roman confular coins, full faces of excellent wTork- their head-dreffes.- Sometimes the bull of an emprefs manftiip are met with. On feveral coins alfo two or is fupported by a crefcent, to imply that fte w'as the three faces are to be feen, and thefe are always ac- moon as her huftand was the fun of the ftate. The counted very valuable. toga, or veil drawn over the face, at firft implied that The diadem, which was.no more than a ribbon tied the perfon was invefted with the pontifical office ; and round the head wdth a floating knot behind, adorns accordingly we find it on the bufts of Julius Casfar, all the Grecian princes from firft to laft, and is almoft while Pontifex Maximua. It likewife implies the au- D 2 gurfhip, 28 Med Arrange- gurflup, the augurs having a particular kind of gown rnenr, &c. ca]ie(j Janat with which they covered their heads when 'J ' sbferving an omen. In latter times this implies only confecration, and is common in coins of empreffes. It is firft met with on the coins of Claudius Gothicus as the mark of confecration of an emperor. The nimbus, or glory, now appropriated to faints, has been already mentioned. It is as ancient as Auguftus, but is not to be met with on many of the imperial medals, even after it began to be appropriated to them. There is a curious coin, which has upon the reverfe of the common piece with the head of Rome Urbs Roma, in large brafs, Conftantine I. fitting amid vidlories and genii, with a triple crown upon his head for Eu¬ rope, Afia, and Africa, with the legend Securitas Romas. Portrays £enera^ only the bull is given upon medals, iipoi/m - though fometimes half the body or more ; in which dais. latter cafe the hands often appear with enfigns of ma- jefty in them ; fuch as the globe faid to* have been in¬ troduced by Auguftus as a fymbol of univerfal domi¬ nion ; the feeptre fometimes confounded with the con- fular ftaff, a roll of parchment, the fymbol of legifla- tive power, and an handkerchief exprelfive of the power over the public games, where the emperor gave the fignal Some princes hold a thunderbolt, flowing that their power on earth was equal to that of Jupiter in Heaven ; while others hold an image of Viffory. Medals likewife afford a good number of portraits of illuftrious men ; but they cannot eafily be arranged in chronological order, fo that a feries of them is not to be expedfed. It is likewife vain to attempt the formation of a feries of gods and goddeffes to be foun4 on ancient coins. Mr Pinkerton thinks it much bet¬ ter to arrange them under the feveral cities or kings whofe names they hear. A colledfion of the portraits of illuftrious men may likewife be formed from medals of modern date. JUverfes of ^‘e reverfes of ancient Greek and Roman coins Greek ami afford an infinite variety of inftrudlion and amufement. Roman They contain figures of deities at full length, with coins. their attributes and fymbols, public fymbols and diver- fions, plants, animals, &c. &c. and in fhort almoft every objedl of nature or art. Some have the por¬ trait of the queen, fon, or daughter of the prince whofe image appears on the face or obverfe ; and thefe are efteemed highly by antiquaries, not only becaufe every coin ftamped with portraits on both fides is ac¬ counted valuable, but becaufe they render it certain that the perfon reprefented on the reverfe was the wife, fon, or daughter of him who appears on the obverfe ; by which means they afiift greatly in the ad- jufting of a feries. Some, however, with two portraits arc common, as Auguftus, the reverfe of Caligula; and Marcus Aurelius, reverfe of Antoninus Pius. We find more art and defign in the reverfes of the Roman medal’s than of the Greek r but, on the oilier hand, the latter have more exquifite relief and work- manfhip. The very ancient coins have no reverfes, excepting a rude mark ftruck into the metal refem- bling that of an inftftiment with four blunt points on which the coin was ftruck ; and was owing to its ha¬ ving been fixed by fuch an inftrument on that fide to receive the imprelfion upon the other. To this fuceeeds the image of a dolphin, or fbme fmall animal, 3 A L S. Sefl. X. in one of the departments of the rude mark, or in an Arrange- hollow fquare: and this again is fucceeded by a more ,ment’ perfect image, without any mark of the hollow fquare. Some of the Greek coins are hollow in the reverfe, as thofc of Caulonia, Crotona, Metapontum, and fome other ancient cities of Magna Grecia. About 500 B. C. perfect reverfes appear on the Greek coins, of exquifite relief and workmanfhip. “ The very muf- cles -of men and animals (fays Mr Pinkerton) are ieen, and will bear inipeftion with the largeft magnifier as ancient gems. The ancients certainly had not eyes different from ouVs ; and it is clear that they muft have magnified obje&s. A drop of water forms a micro- feope ; and it is probable this was the only one of the ancients. To Greek artifts we are indebted for the beauty of the Roman imperial coins; and thefe are fo highly finifhed, that on fome reverfes, as that of Nero’s decurfion, the advent us and progrejfus of vari¬ ous, emperors, the fundator pacts of Severus, the fea¬ tures of the emperor, riding or walking, are as exa£b as on the obverfe. But though the bell Greek ar¬ tifts wrere called to Rome, yet the Greek coins under the Roman emperors are fometimes well executed, and always full of variety and curiofity. No Roman or Etrufcan coins have been found of the globular form, or indented on the reverfe like the early Greek. The firft Greek are fmall pieces of filver, while the Roman are large maffes of copper. The former are ftruck ; the latter call in moulds. The reverfes of the Roman coins are very uniform, the prow of a fhip, a car, or the like, till about the year 100 B. C, when various reverfes appear on their confular coins in all metals. The variety and beauty of the Roman impe¬ rial reveifes are well known. The medallift much va¬ lues thofe which have a number of figures; as the Puella FauJUnianee, of Fauftina, a gold coin no larger than a fixpence, which has 12 figures ; that of Trajan, regna ajpgnata, has four; the congiarium of Nerva five ; the allocution of Trajan feven } of Hadrian 1,0 ; o£ Probus 12. Some Roman medals have fmall figures on both fides, as the Jpolloni fanSo of Julian II. Such have not received any peculiar name among the medal- lifts. Others have only a reverfe, as the noted fpintri- ati, which have numerals I. II. &c. on . the ob¬ verfe.” i*y The names of the deities reprefented on the rever- Of the dei- fes of Greek coins are never expreffed ; perhaps, as Mr j.,es '-epre- Pinkerton fuppofes, out of piety, a fymbolical repre-^^P0* fentation of their attributes being all that they thought £u;nJ,‘ proper to delineate ; but the Roman coins always ex¬ press the name, frequently with an adjuntl, as Veneri Victrici, &c. In others, the name of the empe¬ ror or emprefs is added t as Pudiciti.® August®, round an iraa^e of Modefty; Virtus Augusti, a legend for an image of Virtue. The principal fymbols of the divine attributes to be met with on the Greek medals are as follow: t. Jupiter is known on the coins of Alexander the Great by his eagle and thunderbolts; but when the figure occurs only on the obverfes of coins, he is di- ftingiwfhed'by a laurel crown, and placid bearded coun¬ tenance. Jupiter Ammon is known, by the ram’s- hern twilling round his ear ; a fymbol of power and ftrength, affumed by fome of the fucceffors of Akx- ander the Great, particularly by Lyfimaehus. 2. Nep- sea. X. M E l Arrange- 2. Neptune is known by his trident, dolphin, or be- . ate nr, 6cc, jng drawn by fea-horfes; but he is fcldora met with on ' the Grecian coins. 3. Apollo is dillinguifhed by an harp, branch of laurel, or tripod; and fometimes by a bow and arrows. In the character of the. Sun, his head is furrounded with rays •, but when the butt only occurs, he has a fair young face, and is crowned with laurel. He is frequent on the coins of the Syrian princes. 4. Mars is diftinguiflied by his armour, and fome¬ times by a trophy on his Ihbulders. His head is . armed with a' helmet, auid lias a ferocious counte¬ nance. 5. Mercury is reprefented as a youth, with a fmall cap on his head, wings behind his ears and on his feet. He is known by the cap, which refembles a fmall hat, and the wings. He appears alfo with the caduceus, or wand twined with ferpents, and the mar- Jupium, or purfe, which he holds in his hand. 6. iEfculapius is known by his bufhy beard, and his leaning on a club with a ferpent twitted round it. He fometimes occurs with his wife Hygeia or Health, with their fon Telefphorus or Convalefcence between them. 7. Bacchus is known by his crown of ivy or vine, his diadem and horn, with a tiger and fatyrs around him. 8. The figure of Hercules is common on the coins of Alexander the Great, and has frequently been mi- flaken for that of the prince himfelf. He appears fometimes as a youth and fometimes with a beard. He is known by the club, lion’s Ikin, and remarkable apparent ftrength; fometimes he has a cup in his hand, and a poplar tree, as a fymbol of vigour, is fometimes added to the portrait. 9. The Egyptian Serapis is known by his bufhy beard, and a meafure. upon his head. 10. Apis is delineated in the form of a bull, with a flower of the lotos, the water-lily of the Nile, fup- pofed by Macrobius to be a fymbol of creation; and Jamblichus tells us, that Ofiris was thought to have his throne in it. xi. Harpocrates, the god of Silence, appears with his finger on his mouth ; fometimes with the fiftrum in his left hand ; a fymbol common to molt of the.Egyp¬ tian deities. 12. Canopus, another Egyptian deity, appears in the fhape of an human, head placed on a kind of pitch¬ er. “ This deified pitcher (fays Mr Pinkerton) feems to refer to an anecdote of ancient fuperftition, .which, I. believe, is recorded by Plutarch. It feems fome Per- fian and Egyptian prietts had a conteft which of their deities had the fuperiority. The Egyptian faid, that a fmgle vafe, facred to Serapis, would extinguifh the whole power of the Perfian deity, of fire. The expe¬ riment was tried; and the wily Egyptian, boring holes in the vafe and flopping them with wax, afterwards filled the vafe with water; which, guttling through the holes as the wax melted, extinguiflted the Perfian deity. Hence the vafe was deified.” 13. The Holy Senate and Holy People, appear fre¬ quently on Greek imperial coins,.fometimes reprefent¬ ed as old men with beards, at others as youths. The goddefles reprefented on medals are, x. Juno) reprefented by a beautiful young woman, > A L S. *5 fometimes with a diadem, fometimes without any Arrange • badge, which is reckoned a fufficient diftindlion, as the other goddefies all wear badges. Sometimes fhe • 1 appears as the goddefs of marriage ; and is then veiled to the middle and fometimes to the toes. She is known by the peacock, a bird facred to her from the fable of Argus. 2. Minerva is very common on the coins of Alex¬ ander the Great; and her butt has been miftaken by the celebrated painter Le Brun for the hero himfelf. She is very eafily diftinguifhed by the helmet. Her fymbols are, her armour ; the fpear in her right hand, and the aegis, with a Medufa’s head, in her left; an ovvT’ commonly Handing by her. 3. Diana of Ephefus is commonly reprefented on the Greek imperial coins; and appears with a great number of breatts, fuppofed to denote univerfal Na¬ ture. She is fupported by two deer, and carries a pannier of fruit upon her head. The butt of this goddefs is known by the (mefeent on her brow, and' iometimes by the bow and quiver at her fide. 4. Venus is known by an apple, the prize of beau¬ ty, in her hand. Sometimes ftie is diftinguittied only by her total want of drefs; but is always to be known by her extraordinary beauty, and is fometimes adorned with pearls about the neck. 5. Cupid is fometimes met with on the Syrian coins, and is known by his infancy and wings. 6. Cybele is known by a turreted crown and lion or is feen in a chariot drawn by lions. 7. Ceres is known by her garland of wheat, and is common on the Sicilian coins ; that ifland being re¬ markable for its fertility. Sometimes fhe has two fer¬ pents by her, and is fometimes drawn in a chariot by them. She carries in her hands the torches with which Ihe is fabled to have gone in fearch of her daughter Proferpine. 8. Proferpine herfelf is fometimes met with on coins with the name of or the 9. The Egyptian Ifis. has a bud or flower on her head ; a fymbol of the perpetual bloom ef the inha¬ bitants of heaven. She carries alfo a fiftrum in her hand. 10. The Sidonian Aftarte appears on a globe fup¬ ported on a chariot with two wheels, and drawn by two horfes. Thefe are the deities moft commonly reprefented on the Greek coins.. The more uncommon are, Saturn with his feythe, or with a hook on the He-raclian coins ; . Vulcan with his tongs, on the reverfe of a coin of Thyatira, reprefented at work in the prefence of Minerva. Adranus, a Sicilian god, is fometimes re¬ prefented on coins with a dog. Anubif, an Egyp¬ tian deity, has a dog.’s head.. Ati* is known by his Phrygian bonnet; Caftor and Pollux by a liar on the head of each ; Dis, by his old face, di fhe veiled hair and beardj and a hook ; Flora by her crown of flow¬ ers ; Nemefis by her wheel-; and Pan by his horns and ears belonging to fome kind of beaft. There are likewife to be found on medals many x^te 0f different fymbols by themfelves; of the moft remark-Symyol*« able of which we (hall give the following table, with their fignifieations : Symbols. Signification.- 1. Vafes with-fprigs, « Solemn games. 2. SaaaU.^ M Symbols. _c\ 2. Small cheft or hamper, with ferpent leaping out. 3. Anchor on Seleucian medals, E D Signification. CMyftic rites of 2 Bacchus. Coin ftruck x at Antioch, < where an an- r chorwasdug ^ up. 4* inerted hamper a" ^ ^ {Covered tripod. 5. Bee, 6. Laurel, 7. Reed, 8. Ivy and grapes, 9. Poppy, 10. Corn, a 1. Owl and olive, is. Dove, 13. Torch, " 14. Mudnis, or conic Hone, Symbols of Countries, &c. •15. Pomegranate flowers, - Rhodes. 16. Owl, - - - Athens. 17. Pegafus, - - Corinth. 18. Wolf’s head, - Argos. 19. Bull’s head, - - Boeotia. 20. Minotaur’s head and labyrinth, Crete. 21. Horfe’s head, - Pharfalia. 22. Lion, - - Marfeilles. 23. Tortoife, - - Peloponnefus. 24. Sphinx, - - Scio. 25. Three legs joined, as in the Ifle Jo- m of Man-monev. / IC1 A I s: Symbols. 35. Globe on an altar with three ftars. 36. Fort and gate, 37. Tribuli, a kind of Chevaux de Prize, - 38. Altar or tripod, 39. Dolphin, 40. Le&ifternia, 41. Lituus, or twifted wand, 42. Apex, or cap with firings, 43. Thenfa, or chariot employed to carry images, 44. Peacock, 45. Eagle, - - Sea. XI; Signification. Arranee* I Pie world pre- ment» &c>.| ferved by the ' J- I gods for the j three fons of I Conftantine LL.' 1 Security. ^ Unknown. Piety. Apollo. Feftivals. Augurfhip. Pontificate. ( Confecrationof l an emprefs. Ditto. ( Confecrationof I an emperor. of Man-money, 26. Horfe, 27. The crefcent, 28. Bull, 29. Enfign, with the letters col. 30. Bull, 31. Caduceus, 32. Cornucopia, 33. Pontifical hat, 34. Parazonium, - — Theflaly. Byzantium(A). C Suppofed to be 2 a river. C A colony drawn ■< from one le- C gion. 5 Apis, ftrcngth \ or fecurity. f Peace and con- \ cord. Abundance. Priefthood. C Baton of com- 2, mand. The legends put upon medals are defigned as ex- *17 planations of them ; but as the compafs of even the large ft coins does not admit of any great length of infcription, it has always been found neceflary to ufe abbreviations; and in readily decyphering thefe lies a confiderable part of the difficulty of the fcience. This, however, is greater in the Roman than in the Greek medals; for the Greeks commonly infert as much of the word as is fufficient to enable us eafily to under- ftand its meaning ; but it is common for thofe who at¬ tempt to explain letters that do not often occur, to fall into very ridiculous errors. Of this Mr Pinker- ton gives a moft remarkable inftance in Fortunius Li-„*r cetus, a learned man, who finding upon a coin of A- take of For- drian the letters r. ia. fignifying the 14th year of that tuniusLice- emperor’s reign, imagined that they flgnified Lucer-tU5‘ nas invenit Delta ; “ Delta invented lanthorns and thence afcribed the origin of lanthorns to the Egyp¬ tians. Tables explaining the meaning of the abbrevi¬ ations found upon medals have been publilhed by Pa- tin, Urfatus, and others. Sect. XL Of Medallions, Medalets, &c. Besides the ordinary coins of the ancients, which pafled in common circulation through the country, there were others of a larger fize, which are now term¬ ed medallions. Thefe were ftruck on the commence¬ ment of the reign of a new emperor and other folemn occafions : frequently alfo, by the Greeksin particular, as monuments,-of gratitude or of flattery. Sometimes they were mere trial or pattern pieces; and thofe abound after the time of Maximian with the words Tres Monette on the reverfe. The common opinion (a) This appears Cn the early coins of Byzantium, with the legend btzantin xit. “ the preferver of Byzantium.” The reafon of this was, that when Philip of Macedon befieged the city, and vras about to ftorm it in a cloudy night, the moon flione out on a fudden and difcgvered, him ; by which means the inhabi¬ tants had time to colle& their forces and repulfe him. . The Turks, on entering Conftantinople, found this badge in many places ; and fufpe&ing fome magical power in it, aflumed the fymbol and its power to them- felve® ; fo that the crefcent is now the chief Turkilh enfign. Sea. XT. MED Medal- is, that all the Roman pieces of gold exceeding the lions, &c. denarius aureus, all in filver exceeding the denarius, 'J" * and all in brafs exceeding the feilertius, went under the denomination of medallions: but Mr Pinkerton thinks that many of thefe large pieces went in circu¬ lation, tho’ not.very commonly, as our five and two guinea pieces, filver crowns, &c. do in this country* The fineft medallions were prefented by the mint-ma- fters to the emperor, apd by the'emperor to his friends, as fpecimens of fine workmanfiiip. The belt we have at p; Tent are of brafs, and many of them compofed of two forts of metal; the centre being copper, with a ring of brafs around it, or the contrary ; and the infcription is fometimes confined to one of the metals, fometimes not. There is a remarkable difference be¬ tween the Greek and Roman medallions in point of thicknefs ; the latter being frequently three or four lines thick, while the other feldom exceed one. Very few medallions, however, were ftruck by the Greeks before the time of the Roman emperors ; but the Greek medallions of the emperors are more numerous than thofe of the Romans themfelves. All thefe pieces, however, are of fuch high price that few private per- fans are able to purchafe them. In the laft: century Chriffina queen of Sweden procured about 300. In the king of France’s cblle£fion there are 1200; a num¬ ber formerly fuppofed not to exifl ; and Dr Hun¬ ter’s collection contains about 400, exclufive of the Egyptian. Befides thefe large pieces, there are fmaller ones of a fize fomewhat larger than our half-crowns; and by Italian medallifls are called medaglion cini, or fmall medallions. They are ftill fcarcer than the large kind. tI^ There is ftill a third kind, which have almoft efca- @f meda- Ped the notice of medallifts, viz. the fmall coins or lots. mijfdia fcattered among the people on folemn occa- fions ; fuch as thofe ftruck for the flaves. on account of. the faturnalia ; counters for gaming ; tickets for baths and feafts; tokens in copper and in lead; ,&c. Thefe are diftinguiftied by Mr Pinkerton by the name of medalets. Many, or perhaps almoft all, of thofe ftruck for the faturnalia were fatyrical; as the Haves had then a licence to ridicule not only their mafters but any perfon whatever. Mr Pinkerton mentions one of the moft common pieces of this kind, which has on the obverfe the head of an old woman veiled,, with a laurel crown ; the reverfe only s. c.‘ within a wreath. Baudelot is of opinion that it is the head of Acca Laurentia, the nurfe of Romulus, to whom a feftival was ordained. “ Perhaps (fays Mr Pinkerton), it was ftruck in ridicule of Julius C JDirenifh. ‘ XX. Coins of northern nations ufing uncommon charafters, as the Punic and German. “ In Ae modern part no feries can be formed of copper that will go back above two centuries; but fe- K3 201. The moft ancient coins, according to Froelich, arc diftinguifhed by the following marks, which he ac counts infallible. 1, Their oval circumference, and globulouS fwelling fhape. i. Antiquity of alphabet, 3. The characters being retrograde, or the firft divi- fion of the legend in the common flyle, while the next is retrograde. 4. The indented fquare already deferi- bcd. 5. The fimple ftruCture of the mintage. 6. Some of A L S. Sed. Xltj quences (chronological feries) of gold and filver may Direftion* be arranged of all the different empires, kingdoms, and for making 1 ftates, as far as their feveral coinages will allo^v. Thofe ca'1 Bct*- • 1 of England and France will be the moll perfect. Mo- v“' dern filver is commonly arranged in three fequences j the dollar, the groat, and the penny fizes. The me¬ dals of each modern country ought of courfe to be feparated; though it is beft to arrange each fet in chronological order, let their fize of metal be what they will. It may be remarked here, that our modern medals, of the fize of a tea-faucer, are only fo many mo¬ numents of barbarifm. The ancient medallions are almoft univerfally but little larger than our crown-piece, though three or four of them may extend to about two. inches diameter, but very many modern -medals to four inches and more. A large medal always declares an ig~- norant prince or an ignorant artift. Into the fize of a crown-piece the ancients threw more miracles in thi-s way than Will ever appear in thefe monftrous productions.” Thefe directions will likewife apply to the forma¬ tion of a cabinet of the fecond kind : but if the col¬ lector means to form a ferks of large Roman brafs, he will find the coins of four or five emperors fo fcarce as not to be attainable in that feries, even at any price. He muft therefore fupply their places with middle brafs, as is allowed with regard to Otho ; even iti the beft cabinets, there not being above three coins of that emperor in large brafs known in the world ; whereas of the middle brafs, two or three hundred may exift. For this reafon Mr Pinkerton concludes, that in cabinets of the fecond clafs, the collector may mingle the large and fecond brafs together as he thinks proper, in order to fave expencc; though it would not do fo well to unite fuch difproportionate fizes as the large and fmall. “ In the fmall fequence, however (fays he), there can be no harm in his mix¬ ing gold, filver, and brafs, as chance or curiofity may- lead him to purchafe any of thefe metals. And tho' your ftarched bigotted medallift may fneer becaufe fuch a fequence would controvert his formal and narrow way of thinking, common fenfe will authorife us to laugh at the pedant in our turn, and to pronounce fuch * feries more various, rich, and interefting, than if the colle&or had arranged only one metal, and re¬ jected a curious article becaufe he did not colleCt gold or filver. In like manner, if, in the modern part of the fmaller cabinet, any coin of a feries is of high price, or of bad iffipreflion, there can be no impro¬ priety in putting another of the fame reign, which h cheaper, or better executed, though of a different de¬ nomination or of a little larger iize. In fhort, the colkClor has no rules but in the Greek cities and Ro¬ man families, to obferve alphabetical order and chro¬ nology in every thing elfe. Tables of Ancient Coins. Tables. MED Ancient 0f tlw very old coitis are hollowed on the reverfe, with Coins, tfre image Imprefled on the front. 7. The drefs, fym- * 13 v bols, &c. frequently of the rudeft defign and execu¬ tion. T'able I. Ancient Greek Coins. 1. Thofe without imprefiion. 2. With one or more hollowindented marks on one fide, and an impreflion in relief on the other.— Of Chal- cedon on the Hellefpont, Lefbos, Abdera in Thrace, Acanthus in Macedon, thofe faid to belong to Egium in Achaia. This clafe continues from about 900 to 700 B.C. 3. With an indented fquare divided into fegments, having a fmall figure in One of them ; the reft blank, with a figure in relief on the obverfe.—Of Syracufe and other places adjacent.—Continue from 700 to 600 B. C. 4. Coins hollow on the reverfe, with figures in relief on the obverfe.- Of Caulonia, Crotona, Metapontum, &c. Suppofed by fome to be a local coinage of Magna Graecia; but probably of equal antiquity with the former. 5. Coins in which a fquare dye is ufed on one or both fides.—Of Athens, Cyrene, Argos, &c.—Of Alexander I. and Archelaus I. of Macedon. Difufed in the reign of the latter about 420 B. C. 6. Complete coins, both in obverfe and reverfe, oc¬ cur firft in Sicily in the time of Gelo, about 491 B. C. 7. Coins of Alexander the Great and his fucceflbrs. About the time of this hero the Greek coins began to attain to perfection, and were ftriick of uncommon beauty. It is remarkable, that on the coins of this monarch his own image feldom occurs. The only one yet found of Alexander with his portrait upon it, and ftruck during his reign, is a filver hemidrachm in Dr Hunter’s cabinet, which is reprefented PlateCCXCII. n' 3. After his death many coins bear his portrait. Trebellius Pollio informs us, that fome coins, parti- ticularly thofe of Alexander, ufed to be worn as amu¬ lets ; and many medals are met with in cabinets bo¬ red feemingly with that intention. 8. Coins, of the fucceffors of Alexander.—Thofe of the Syrian monarchs almoft equal the coins of Alex¬ ander himfelf in beauty, Thofe of Antiochus VI. are fuppofed to be the moft perfedf patterns of male beauty to be met with anywhere. The Egyptian Ptolemies are fomewhat inferior. 9. The coins of the Arfacidoe of Parthia done by Greek workmen. 10. The Greek imperial coinsi being fuch as have the head of an emperor or emprefs; fuch as have not thefe impreflions being dafied with the civic coins, though ftruck under the Roman power. None of the imperial coins occur in gold. Of filver there are thofe of Antioch, Tyre, Sidon, Tarfus, Berytus, Ctefarea. Egyptian filver coins of bafe metal. Syrian filver coins, which fometimes bear on the reverfe the club of Her¬ cules, or the Tyrian Ihell-filh. Thofe of Sidon bear the image of the goddefs Aftarte, or her chariot. Thofe of Csefarea in Cappadocia of better work than the Syrian. Lycian coins of good workmanlhip : on the reverfe; two harps and an owl fitting upon them. Silver coins of Gelon in Sarmatia refembling the Sy- Vol. XI. Part I. b ' A L S. 33 rian. The fituation of this town is very much un- Ancient known. It feems to have been fituated on the north , t of the Euxine fea, where fome Sarmatic or Sclavonic tribes were mingled with the Scythians or Goths. The Greek imperial brafs coins are very numerous. A feries of almoft all the emperors may be had from thofe of Antioch, with a Latin legend on the obverfe jmd Greek on the reverfe. Thofe of Bithynia and Phrygia remarkable for good workmanfhip. The coins of Tarfus remarkable for their curious views of ob- je&s, almoft in perfpeftive. The Egyptian coins, from the time of Auguftus to Nero, are worfe ex¬ ecuted than afterwards. From Nero to Commo- dus they are frequently of admirable workmanfhip, and in a peculiar ftyle, diftinft both from the Greek and Roman. From the time of Commodus they de¬ cline, and are loft after the reign of Conftantius I. The Egyptian brafs coins of the Roman period are likewife of excellent workmanfhip, efpecially in the time of Antoninus Pius. Table II. Roman Coins. I. The confular coins, called alfo the coins of fami¬ lies, and arranged alphabetically in cabinets, accord¬ ing to the names of the families which appear on them. They are, 1. Brajs Coins.—Thefe confift chiefly of large pieces of rude workmanfhip without any interefting imagery. In cabinets they are generally kept in boxes apart by themfelves. The as bears the head of Janus; the fe- mis of Jupiter with S ; the triens of Minerva with four ciphers; the quadrans of Hercules with three ci¬ phers ; the fextans of Mercury with two cyphers; and the uncia bears the head of Rome with one ci¬ pher. In all thefe pieces the prow of a fhip is con- ilantly the figure on the reverfe, with very few excep¬ tions. Sometimes, indeed, they have a fhell, two heads of barley, a frog, an anchor, or a dog, on the re¬ verfe. About the time of Julius Caefar both the ob- verfes and the reverfes of the coins began to be al¬ tered. 2. Silver. Of this the denarius was the firft and principal coin. It was ftamped originally with X, denoting that the value was ten afes. On the reverfe was Caftor and Pollux, or a chariot of Viftory. Af¬ terwards the bufts of various deities make their ap¬ pearance ; and in the feventh century of Rome the portraits of illuftrious perfons deceafed are met with : but till the time of Julius Cxfar no figure of any living perfon is to be met with ; Julius himfelf being the firft who afiumed that honour. The workmanfliip on the beft and worft filver is much the fame. The reverfes are very curious, and point out many remark¬ able events in Roman hiftory ; but none of thefe oc¬ cur till about a century before the Chriftian era. The large denarii, with Roma, are the moft ancient ; and fome of thefe bear the Pelafgic A, not the Roman. The filver feftertii have a head of Mercurv, with a caduceus on the reverfe. The quinarii have always a head of Jupiter, with a Viftory on the reverie. 3. Gold. — Moft of thefe are of great value. The number of thefe exceeds not 100 ; thofe of brafs 200; and of filver 2000. The aureus is the general gold coin; but two or three gold femifies of families like¬ wife occur. E II. MEDALS. Tables. II. Roman imperial coins. i. Brafs,—This is of three fizes; large, middle, and fmall. The firft forms a moil beautiful feries, but very expenfive. The various colours of the pati¬ na have the fineit effedl. It is the moil important of all the Roman coins, and exceeds even the gold in value. The middle brafs is next in value to the former; and in it are many rare and curious coins, particular¬ ly interefting to Britons, as elucidating the hiftory of the ifland. Of thefe are the triumphal arch of Clau¬ dius; the Exerc. Britannicus of Adrian; the coins of Antoninus Pius, Commodus, Severus, with a Vidlory, Victoria Britan. : but efpecially thofe perfonifying the country Britannia. “ The num- “ ber of Roman coins relating to Britain (fays Mr Pin¬ kerton) is remarkable, more than 20 having been (truck at various times ; while thofe perfonifying Italy, Gaul, Spain, and other regions of the empire, exceed not four or fix at mod for each country. Only one country vies with Britain, and that is Dacia on the extreme north-eaft of the empire, as Britain on the extreme north-weft. No doubt this cireumftance of rernste- nefs in thefe two countries recommended them to this particular attention, as more expreflive of the Roman power. The fmall brafs feries abounds alfo with curious coins. They are fcarce till the time of Valerian and Gallienus, but very common afterwards. Mr Pinker¬ ton recommends, therefore, to form a feries in filver as well as brafs; both being the cheapeft of all the Roman coins. “ In this feries (fays he), it is a common fault to arrange many coins which have been plated with gold or filver, the forgeries of ancient times, but which time has worn off either wholly or in part. All real brafs coins have the s. c. till the time of Gallienus ; as the fenate alone had the power of ftriking brafs, while the emperor himfelf had that of gold and filver. When the s. c. therefore, is wanting, the coin was certainly once plated; as, in general, the different type and fabric, being thofe of gold and filver, fufficiently (how themfelves. With Pertinax, A. D. 192, there is a temporary ceffation of fmall brafs; nor after him do any princes occur in that feries till Valerian, A. D. 254, excepting Traja- nus Decius, A. D. 250 only. After Valerian the fe- ries is continuous and common. The brafs coinage gradually declined in fize from the time of Severus; fo that parts of the as could not be ftruck, or at leaft it was held unneceffary to ftrike them. Trajanus De¬ cius attempted in vain to reftore the coinage ; and Va¬ lerian and Gallienus were forced to iffue denarii aerei and fmall affaria. The feries of large and of middle brafs are of two fixed and known fizes ; the former a- -bout that of our crown, the latter of the half crown : though after Severus they gradually leffen. But the fmall brafs takes in all parts of the as ; and every brafs coin not larger than our (hilling belongs to this feries. The minimi., indeed, or very (mailed, it is proper to keep apart. The coins of Julius Cefar in this fizeare of peculiarly fine workmanlhtp. They bear his. por¬ trait reverfe of Auguftus, or the reverfe has a croco¬ dile Egypto capta. There are feveral with Mark Anthony, and fome with Cleopatra ; but the more common pieces are tbofe with only numerals on the Ancient obverfe, which go the length of XIII; probably tic- c°!ns’ kets for the baths. A great many occur in the time ”"v of Nero ; of which Mr Pinkerton particularifes one which has “ on the reverfe a table ornamented with griffins and other devices. Upon it is placed a wreath of laurel, and a beautiful vafe, of which the emboffed human figures are fo minute, and finiffied fo furprifing- ly, as to (lamp thefe coins the mod exquifite produc¬ tions of the ancient mint.” From the time of Nero to that of Vefpafian no fmall brafs occurs: but there are many of this emperor and of his fon Titus ; while Domitian has as many as Nero, and Domitia his wife has almoft as many. Succeeding emperors to the time of Pertinax have alfo many brafs coins ; but from his time to that of Valerian there are no real fmall brafs, excepting thofe of Trajanus Decius. After Gallienus there are a great many coins of this kind; and Mr Pinkerton mentions one in Dr Hunter’s cabinet, of an unknown perfon named Nigrianus. The coin feems to have been ftruck at Carthage ; and our author con¬ cludes that he was an African Ufurper, father to Ni- grinianus. 2. Silver—This feries is very complete, and the cheapeft of any ; efpecially as the fmall brafs be¬ comes a fi»e fupplement to it: the latter being had in plenty when the filver becomes fcarce, and the filver being plentiful when the brafs is fcarce. 3. Gold.—The Roman imperial gold coins form a feries of great beauty and perfection ; but on account of their great price are beyond the purchafe of private perfon s. 4.. The colonial coins oqcut only in brafs, none, excepting that of Nemaufus, having a right to coin filver. They begin in Spain with Julius Caefar and Anthony, and ceafe with Caligula, who took away the privilege of coinage from the Spaniffi colonies^ The mod beautiful are thofe of Corinth. The other remarkable colonial coins are thofe of Emerita, Ilice, Terraco, Caffandria, Babba, Berytus, Caefarea, Pa¬ tras, Emifa, Heliopolis or Balbec, Ptolemais, Sidon, Tyre, Deulton, Dium, Troas, Rhefaina, Neapolis of Samaria, which bears a reprefentation of Mount Gerizzim with the temple on it, Hippo in Africa, &c. On many of thefe coins we meet with fine re- prefentations of temples, triumphal arches, gods, god- deffes, and illuftrious perfons. But coins with thole reprefentations are by no means common ; the colonial coins till the time of Trajan bearing only a plouglr, or fome other fimple badge of a colony. Camelodu* num is the only colony in, Britain of which we have any coins. 5. The minimi.—This includes the (mailed coins of all denominations, mod of which do not exceed the fize of a filver penny. Th^y are the mod curious of all; but no feries of them was ever formed by any per¬ fon except the Abbe Rothelin, whole collection form¬ ed of all metals paffed to the queen of Spain. The reafon of the fcarcity of thefe fmall coins is probably their diminutive fize ; by reafon of which they are moftly loft. It is furprifing that numbers of Roman coins are found through all countries once fubjeft to that power¬ ful people. Some have been met with in the Ork- 6 neys. Tables. MED Ancient n«ys, and many in the moft remote parts of Europe> ^ Co‘ils- Alia, and Africa, known to the ancients. Table 111. Coins of other ancient Nations. 1. The Lydians appear to have invented coinage; though, perhaps, this honour may be difputed with them by the Greeks. 2. The Aflyrians, Medes, Babylonians, Phenicians, and Egyptians, had no coins. In the mouths of the mummies are only thin, unftamped, and round pieces of gold to pay Charon’s fare. 3. No Indian or Chinefe coins are to be met with till a very late period ; and even then fo rude as fcarce to be worth notice. Voltaire mentions a colleftion of ancient Chinefe and Indian coins made by the emperor of China in 1700; but Mr Pinkerton fuppofes it to have confided only of the Greek and Roman' money which had been introduced into thefe countries. 4. The Lydian coins have no legends ; fo that mere conjefture only determines the ancient coins of eleftrum and filver found in Afia, and different from the Per- iian, to belong to Lydia. Croefus coined gold into a form which he called Jiaters; and Mr Pinkerton mentions a very ancient gold coin in Dr Hunter’s ca- hinet, which he fuppofes to have been one of thefe. It has a globous figure,with indented marks on one fide, and on the other a man kneeling, with a fifh held out in the left hand, and a fword depending in the right. It weighs four drams; which Jofephus tells us was the weight of the Lydian gold coins. In the fame col- leftion are other gold coins little inferior in antiqui¬ ty ; the moft ancient of which, our author fuppofes, may have been coined by the cities bf Afia Minor, as coinage paffed through them to Greece. 'They are of admirable workmanfhip, and as much fuperior to the bell Sicilian coins, as the latter are to all the reft in the world. Thefe gold coins are all extremely pale; owdng to the want of knowledge in refining gold. 5. Perfian coins.—Thefe were firft ftruckby Darius Hyftafpes, whence they had the name of Darks. They are of gold, and generally have the figure of an archer:, they weigh about four drachms; and fome occur with the indented mark on one fide, while others have figures upon both. The filver coins have generally a king in a chariot of two horfes, with a charioteer, and fometimes another figure on foot be¬ hind on the obverfe , while the reverfe prefents a ftiip, fometimes a ram, bull, or other animal. The gold coin^, w'hich only had the title of Darks, are ex¬ tremely fcarce, having been melted down, as is fup- pofed, and recoined by Alexander the Great on his conqueft of Afia. There is a fecond feries of Perfian coins beginning with Artaxares, or Artaxerxes, who overthrew the Parthian monarchy about the year 210. Thefe are large and thin, with the king’s buft on one .fide and the altar of Mathras on the other ; generally with a human figure on each fide. Thefe coins continue till the year 636, when Perfia was conquered by the Sa- # racens. Thefe have only Perfian letters upon them, which have never been explained by any antiquaries. Mr Pinkerton fays that they feem to partake of the ancient Greek, Gothic,' and Alanic. 6. The Hebrew Ihekels, originally didrachms, but A L S. 35 after the time of the Maccabees tetradrachms, are al- Ancient moft all forgeries of modern Jews, as well as the brafs r-'°“ia' , coins with Samaritan charafters upon them. They have all a fprig upon one fide and a vafe on the other. Mr Pinkerton fays, that the admifiion of one of them into a cabinet would almoft be a difgrace to it. 7. Phoenician and Punic coins are vary interefting on account of the great power and wealth of thefe na¬ tions. The alphabets have been cleared by their re¬ lation to the Hebrew and Syriac languages. 8. The coins of Palmyra come under the fame de¬ nomination with the former, Palmyra being a Syrian city. 9. The Etrufcan coins have the charafters of that nation, which have been explained by their affinity to the Pelafgic, or oldeft Greek and Latin. 10. The Spanifh coins are infcribed with two or three alphabets allied to the old Greek or Punic ; but the infcriptions have not been fufficiently explained. 11. Gauliffi coins.—Thefe are numerous; but the moft ancient have no legends; and even after the Greek letters were introduced into Gaul by a colony at Marfeilles, the legends are very difficult to be ex¬ plained. 12. Britifti coins. From a paftage in Caefar’s com¬ mentaries, it has been inferred that the Britons ufed fome kind of coins even in his time. Mr Pinkerton in¬ forms us, that fome rude coins of copper very much mingled with tin are frequently found in England ; which, he fuppofes, may be fome of the ancient Bri- tifh money. They are of the fize of a didrachm, the common form of the nummus aureus among the an¬ cients. After the time of Caefar, coinage increafed among the Britons; and there are many found of Cu- nobelinus mentioned in-the Roman hiftory. Moft of thefe have on one fide cuno, with an ear of wheat, a horfe, a kind of head of Janus, or other fymbol; and have frequently alfo the letters camu ; fuppofed to mean Camelodunum. Sometimes the word Tascia occurs; the meaning of which has not yet been ex¬ plained. 13. Gothic coins of France, Italy, and Spain, to the time of Charles the Great. Thefe have the Ro¬ man charafters upon them. The Italian coins are moftly of the fize of fmall brafs; and in this way we meet with coins of Athalaric, Theodahat, Witigez, and other Gothic princes. Many others occur, the infcriptions of which, though meant for Roman, are fo perverted as to be illegible. Table IV. Modern Coins. 1. Of Japan.—Thefe are thin plates of gold and filver, of an oval figure, with fmall marks or figures ftamped on them. 2. China.—Thefe are only copper, about the fize of a farthing, with a fquare hole in the middle to put them .on firings. The infcriptions on them do not exprefs the name of the fovereign, but the year of his reign ; as the happy year, the illujlrious year, See. 3. The Tartarian coins are rude, having only in¬ fcriptions upon them ; and they are all pofterior to the time of Jenghiz khan. 4. Coins of Thibet, Pegu, and Siam, are much the E 2 fame. 3(5 MED Modem fame, prefenting only inferiptions without any figures. . Coi'ng* . They are alfo of late date. 5. India.—Some old coins have been found in the neighbourhood of Calcutta, of gold, filver, cop¬ per, and tin, all mixed together. Thefe have com¬ monly a warrior with- a fword on one fide and an In¬ dian female idol on the other, of the fame form with the celebrated fculptures in the ifland of Elephanta; but it is impofiible to tell what antiquity they are of. The modern coins are the pagoda of gold,, worth little more than fix {hillings; the r'oupee of filver upwards of two {hillings ; and the cafh, of copper. There is a remarkable let of roupees, which {how the twelve figns; a lion on one, a bull on another, &e. but the oecafion on which they were {truck is unknown. The other coins of India have generally Ptrfian inferiptions upon them. 6. Ptrfia.—The Perfic coins- fince its conqueft by the Arabs continue on the Arabian model. 7. Arabia.—Some coins of the petty princes of Arabia are met with as old as the imperial ages of Rome ; but till the time of Haroun Alrafhid, no re*- gular coinage appears in the vaft empire of the Sar racens. Even then the reverfe has only an inferip- tion, and the obverfe is copied from any Greek or Syrian coin which happened to fall in the moneyer’s way. 1 he later Arabian coins are moftly filver, with the name and titles of the prince on one fide, and feme infeription from the Koran on the other. The more modern coins of this, country are in the {hape of a fifli-hook, with Arabic inferiptions. 8- Turkey.—No regular coinage was formed by the Turks till they became mafters of Conftantinoplc. They refemble thofe of Perfia and Arabia, having merely infeiptions on both fides. 9. The coins of the African ftates, at leaft fuch.as profefs the Mohammedan religion, have merely inferip¬ tions without any figures: thofe of the internalflarts are unknown; and no coinage was ufed among the Mexicans and Peruvians, the only civilized nations in America ; but La Hontan mentions an American fa- rage who had a {Square medal of copper depending from his neck. Mr Pinkerton fuppofes. it to have come from Japan. 10. Modern Italic coins. Befides the Gothic prin¬ ces mentioned in the former table, the exarchs of Ra¬ venna coined money with the infeription Felix Ra- venna, &c. The Lombards ifiued no coins, but there are fome llil-l extant of Charlemagne. The follow¬ ing lift {hows the origin of the coinage in various Ita¬ lian ftates. Rome. Papal coinage originates with Hadrian 1. Size of filver pennies, with the Pope’s name on one fide, and Scos Petrus on the other. No coins appear from 975 to 1099, excepting of Leo IX. In 1303 appear pennies of the fenate and people of Rome, with Peter on the one fide and Paul on the other. There are groats of Clement V. with his portrait three quarters length; but the fide-head begins with Sixtus V, in 1470. Gold was firft coined by John XXII. in 1316. The coins of Alexander VI. Julius II. and Leo X. are remarkable for beauty and elegance. Milan. Coinage began with Charlemagne. The A L S. Tables. firft coin of the family of Vifconti occurs in 1330 un- Modem der Azo. The fet finiflres with Louis XII. Coin?- Naples. Coinage begins in 840 and 880, withv Duke Sergius and Bifhop Athanafius. The next coins are of Roger of Sicily, and Roger II. in 1130, William I. II. and Tancred. Naples and Sicily were fubdued in 1194. by the emperor of Germany; in 1255 Manfred appears ; in 1266 Charles of Provence j and others till Joan in 1414: after which follow the houfe of Arragon, and later kings. Venice begins in the. 10th century. The firft coins are filver pennies-marked Ve.neci. Then follow the coins of Henrico Dandulo in 1192, of Ziani in 1205,. &c. Gold was firft coined at Venice in 1280, and copper in 1471 ; but the filver groats are as old as 1192. Florence. Silver was coined here in the 1 2th cen- tui*y, or before; but in 1252 the firft gold coins ftruck in Europe after the 8th century made their ap¬ pearance, and were named Jlorins from the flower of the lily upon them. They were imitated by the popes, by France, and England. They have on one fide St John the Baptiil Handing, on the other a large Jleur de Its, and it is not doubted that the Frenchjleurs df Us took their origin from thefe coins. They weigh a drachm, and are no lefs than 24 carats fine accord¬ ing to Italian writers, and are worth about 12 {hil¬ lings. firft began to coin money in 1129, under the government of Conrad. Thofe of the dukes of Savoy began in the fame century. Aquileia. Coins were iffued from- this city by the patriarchs from 1204 t() i4t0* Ferrara. Coins of the marquifes from 1340. ir. French coins During the race of Clovis, from 490 till 751, the coins are chiefly gold trunksy with iome (plidi and femiffh. The former are of good workmanlhip, with the heads of kings. The reverfe has a crofs, with the name of the town where they were ftruck. The coins of the fecond race begin with Pepin in 751, and continue till Hugh Capet in 987. 'five coins of the firft race are elegant, but thofe of the fe¬ cond entirely the reverfe, being almoft all iilver pen¬ nies, and feldom bearing the portrait of the king. Thofe of Charlemagne have only Carolus in the field ; while the reverfe bears r. f. or fome fuch in- feription ; though one piece ftruck at Rome has a rude bull of him. '1 he coins of Louis le Debonuaire are better done. The third race begins with Hugh Capet in 987, and extends to this time. The coinage did not begin to improve till 1226 under St Louis, when the groat appears. Its name in Italian is groffo, in French in Englifh groat, or great coin j fo called from its fixe in comparifon with the penny ; and it pafiedfrom Ita¬ ly to France, to Germany, and to England. After the conqueft of France by the Englilh, bafe coins of many kinds were introduced ; and in the year 1574* in the time of Henry III. copper was firft introduced into the French coinage. Befides thefe, the other re¬ markable coins of France are, the blancs or billon groats, firft iflued in 1348 ; the ecus a la couronne, os crowns of gold, fo called from the crown on one fide. Tables. M E D Modern and begun by Charles VI. in 13S4 ; thofe of Ann of Coins. Bretagne in 1493: the teflon, or piece with the king’s head, of Louis XII.; the Henri of Henry II. with Gaul fitting in armour, and a Victory in her Hand. There are many coins of cardinal Bourbon, elected king in 1589,; and in (642, Louis XIV. takes the title of Catalonia; Ppinceps. The firfl Louis d'Or made its appearance in 1640 ; but fuch was the poverty of France, if we believe certain au¬ thors, that in 1719 the duke of Orleans regent ftmck copper for lilver. 12. Spanilh coins. The molt early feries of thefe confifts almolt entirely of trientes, finely done. On one fide they have the head of the king with his name, and on the other a crofs, with the name of the town, commonly in Boetica> or the fouth part of Spain, where there were a great many Roman colonies, and which was fertile to a proverb. The Mo.refque coins of Spain, like thofe of the reft of the Mohammedan ftates, prefent us only with infipid infcriptions on both fides. Indeed the Mohammedan religion, by its abfo- lute refufal to allow the reprefentation of any living creature, has prevented the progrefs of coinage in any degree throughout thofe regions which it has over- fpread. The infcriptions on the ancient Spanilh coins are in the Ciific or old Arabic characters. 13. Portugal. No defcription of the coins of this kingdom has yet appeared. 14. Germany. No account of the German coins lias been publilhed ; though it is well known that not only the emperors, but many of the cities, particular¬ ly thofe called Han/e-towns, iflued money ; and many of the coins iflued by the cities were fuperior in ele¬ gance even to thofe iflued by the emperors. 1 c. Denmark. Here the coinage begins with Ca¬ nute the Great in 1014. The pieces are at firft ex¬ tremely rude, ornamented only with rings and runic charaifters. Thefe are fucceeded by copper pieces, fome of which have a crofs, others a paitoral ftafF on one fide, with the letter A on the other. Later coins have ftrokes 1111, &c. all round them ; but thofe of Harold, Hardicanute, and Magnus Bonus, in 1041, are of neat workmanlhip, and have the portraits of the princes at half length. The coins of Nicolas or Niel, as he is called by the Dane , are mde, as well as thofe of Waldemar I. and the celebrated Margaret. In 1376 Olaf caufed money to be ftruck with a grinning full face, with a crowned O upon the other fide. “ The Swedes (fays Mr Pinkerton) took thefe coins extremely ill, as they thought they grinned at them.” Silver was firft coined in Denmark by Philippa queen of Eric, and daughter to Henry IV. of. Eng¬ land. 16, Sweden. The coinage of this kingdom began in 818 under Biorno, on the plan of Charlemagne. The coins are marked with a crofs. Next follow thofe of Olaf in 1019 ; which Mr Pinkert#n fuppofes to have been the firft true Swedifti coins ; and that the art of coinage firft pafled from England into Den¬ mark in the time of Canute the Great, and from Den¬ mark into Sweden. Thefe coins were ftruck on the Englifh model. During the time that Sweden was lubjeft to Denmark, or miferably harafled by the Danes, the coins of both kingdoms were the fame ; but after the time of Guilavus Vafa many elegant pie- A L S. ces appear. In ■ 1634r dollars were coined with the Modern portrait of Gnftavu. Adolphus, who was killed two f years before: On the reverfe they have the arms of Sweden, with the chemical marks of mercury and fulphur. In 1716, 1717, and 1718, Charles XII. being in extreme want of money, iffued fmall copper coins with Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, &c. upon them, to go for dollars; and on account of thisfcheme, Ba¬ ron Goerta, the fuggeftor of it, was brought to the block. 17. Norway. The coins of this country begins with Olaf in 1006} after which time there are vari¬ ous coins of other princes; but copper was not coined till the year 1343. Befides the coins already mentioned, there are ec- clelialtic coins of France, Germany, Denmark, Swe¬ den, Norway, &c. Thofe of Denmark and Sweden are numerous, but the Norwegian coins of this deno¬ mination are rare. Mr Pinkerton defcribes a filver one in his pofieffion as having arms and a mitre, with the infcription on one fide Sanctus Olaws Rex Norvey ; on the reverfe Olaws Dei Gra. Arcef. Nid’sen, meaning Nidrosiensis, or archbilhop of Nu/ros, now Drontheim., 18. Bohemia. The coinage of this kingdom ap¬ pears at a very early date, viz. in the year 909, under duke Boleflaus 1. Thefe coins are followed by othera. of Boleflaus II. and Emma his wife in 970 ; of Bo¬ leflaus III. in 1002 ; Jaromir in 1020 ; Udalrich iu- 1030, and other princes. The iraffeate money of Ot- tocar I. was coined in 1197. 19. Poland. The coinage of this country is nearly as ancient as that of Bohemia. The coins are on the German model, but no particular account of them has been publiftied. 20. Ruffia. None of the Ruffian money appears to be more ancient than the 13th century. The firft are the kopecks or filver pennies, which have upon them rude figures of animals on one fide,, and a man Hand¬ ing with a bow or fpear on the other. There are like- wife coins of-Mbfeow ftruak by Ariftoteles the archi¬ tect in 1482. The roubles or dollars and their halfs. There are fome of the impoftor Demetrius in 1605, which are very fcarce. 21- Pruffia. The firft Pruflian coins were ftruck . at Culm by the Teutonic knights in 1230. They were filver pennies, and upon the German plan. In the, next century were ftruck fliillings,, groats, and fchots; the laft were the largeft, and are extremely rare. They have the Pruflian ftiield, an eagle fur¬ mounting a crofs, with a rofe-lhaped border, moneta dominorum Prussije-.: on the reverfe is a crofs fleu- rie, within a border of a fimilar kind, having the in¬ fcription HONOR MAGISTRI, JUSTITSAM DILIGIT. Gold coins were ftruck. in the fame century. In the time of Copernicus the money was fo debafed,. that t2 or 13. marks were worth but one of pure filver. 22. England. The Englifh coins are of various kinds.. 1 it. Heptarchic. Thefe are only of two forts, viz. the Jkeatta or penny of filver, and theJlyca of copper. Few of the pennies appear till after the year 700 though fome are met with which bear the name of Ethelbert I. king of Kent, as old as 560. At firft they had only rude figures of Jerpents, but in latter 5 timsa.- g8 MED Modern times 'legends were Kkewife added. Moft of thefe , Coins- j pennies have pagan fymbols upon them. The ftyca was only coined in Northumberland, and was a very ^mall piece about the value of half a farthing. 2d. Goins of the chief nwvarchs of England. Mr ■Pinkerton denies that an end was put to the heptar¬ chy by Egbert in 832, as is commonly fuppofed; .though he owns that he was chief monarch of the coun¬ try, as feveral others had been before him. Edgar, who reigned in 959, according to him was the firft king of England ; and the coins of the chief monarchs form almoft a complete feries from the time of Egr bert to Edgar. The only chief monarch of whom there are no coins is Ethel bald, who reigned in 857. Moft of thefe coins bear rude portraits ; but the re- - verfes are fometimes curious and interefting. Same have view§,of cathedrals and other buildings ; particu- ' Jarly one of Edward the Elder in 900 ; which has the cathedral of York with three rows of windows, round arched as the other Saxon and Norman buildings,; the Gothic arch being quite unknown till after the 12th century. Some coins of Anlaf king of Northumber¬ land have the famous raven, the Daniih cnlign ; and thofe of other princes have frequently very curious re- verfes. > 3d. Ecclefqflic coins appear of the archbifhops of Can¬ terbury, Wulfred, in 804, Ceolnoth in 830, and Pleg- mund in 889. 4th. Coins of the lings of England. The iilver pen¬ ny, which had begun dining the heptarchy, continued to be the general coin after the kingdom had been united under one head; and extends in a continued feries from Egbert almoft to the prefent reign. The -only kings wanting are Edmund Ironfide, Richard I. and John. At firft the penny weighed 224- grains ; but towards the clofe of the reign of Edward III. it fell to 18 grains ; and in that of Edward IV. to 12. In the time of Edward VI. it was diminifhed to eight grains; and in Queen Elizabeth’s reign to yf-j-; at which it ftill continues. Halfpennies and farthings were firft ftruck in filver by Edward I. in 1280 ; the former continued to the time of the commonwealth, but the latter ceafed with Edy/ard VI. The groat was introduced by Edward III. in 1354, and continues to this day, though not in common circulation. The half-groat or two¬ pence is of the fame date, and alfo continues to the prefent time. Shillings were firft coined by Henry VII. in 1503. At firft it was called tejloon, from the tejle, tcte, or head of the king upon it; the name Jhilling being derived from the German fchelling; under which appellation coins had been ftruck at Hamburgh in 1407. The crown was firft coined in its prefent form by Henry VIII. Formerly it had appeared only in gold, whence the phrafe of crowns of gold; though thefe indeed were the largeft gold coins known for a long time in France and other countries on the continent, being worth about 10s. fterliug. They had their name from the crown ftamped on one fide, and were firft coined by Charles VI. in 1384, and continued till the time of Toms XIV. The half-crown, fixpence, and three¬ pence, were coined by Edward VI. In 15^8 Queen Elizabeth coined three halfpenny, and in 1561 three farthing, pieces ; but they were difcontinued in 1582. A L S, Tables; From the year 1601 to the prefent time the coins of Modern England remain the fapie. Cu*n8, ? Gold was coined in England by Henry III. in 1257 ; the piece was called ^ gold penny, and was lar¬ ger than the filver one ; and the execution is by no means bad for the time. The feries of gold coinage, however, commences properly from Edward III. In 1344 this monarch firft ftruck florins, in imitation of thofe in Italy ; and it is remarkable, that though thefe coins at the time they were firft iffued bore only fix ftiilUngs value, they are now intrinfically worth *98. ; fo much has the value of gold increafed fince that time. The half and quarter florin were ftruck at the fame time, but only the laft has been found. The florin, however, beingYound inconvenient, gave place to the noble, of 6s. 8d. value, and exaftly half a mark. The latter had its name from being a limited fum in accounts ; and was eight ounces in weight, two-thirds of the money pound. It is fometimes alfo called feli- bra, as being one half of the commercial pound of 16 ounces. The noble had its name from the nobility of the metal; the gold of which it was coined being of the fineft fort. Sometimes it is called Rofe Noble, from both fides being impaled in an undulating circle. It continued with the half and quarter noble to be the only gold coin till the angels of Edward IV. appeared in 1465. Thefe had their name from being ftamped with the image of Michael and the dragon. The an- gelites of 3 s. 4d. value were fubftituted in their place. In 1527 Henry VIII. added to the gold coins the crown and half-crown at their prefent value; and the fame year he gave fovereigns of 22 s. 6d. and ryals of ns. 3d. angels at 7 s. 6d. and nobles at their old value of 6s. 8d. In 1546 Ije caufed fovereigns to be coined of the value of 2os. and half fovereigns in proportion. His gold crown is about the fize of our (hilling, and the half-crown of fixpence, but thin. All his coins, however, gold as well as filver, are much debafed ; and it was not without much labour and trouble that Ed¬ ward VI. brought it back to its former ftandard. On the union of the two crowns, James gave the fovereign the name of unite; the value continuing of 20s. as before. He coined alfo rofe-ryalsof 30s. value, fpur- ryals of 15 s. angels of 10s. and angelets of 5 s. Un¬ der the commonwealth, the fovereign got the name of the twenty-Jhilling piece, and continued current till the coinage of guineas. Thefe were fo called from their being coined of Guinea gold, and were at firft only to go for 20s. though by an univerfal but tacit confent they always pafled for 21s. Half-guineas, double guineas, and five guinea pieces, were alfo coined du¬ ring the fame reign ; which ftill continue, though the two latter are not in common circulation. Quarter guineas were coined by George I. and likewife by his prefent majefty ; but they were found fo trouble- fome on account of their fmall fize, that they were (lop¬ ped within a year or two when received at the bank of England ; and thus are not to be met with at pre- fent. A few pieces of 7 s. value have likewife been coined, and are known by the lion above the helmet; but none have been iflfued. In 1688 the guinea rofe to 2is. 6d. and continued to increafe in value till 1696, when if was as high as 30 s.; but after the re¬ coinage in 1697 and 169811 fell by degrees, and in 1717 was at its old ttandard of 21s. and at that time filver Tables. MED iModem was fixed at its prefent ftandard value, viz. as i to 15^ . Co^ns- in weight. v Though the firft money coined in Britain, as we have already obferved, was copper, yet, excepting the Northumbrian ftycas, no copper coin was found in England from the time of the Saxon conqueft till the year 167.1. An averfion to a copper coinage it feems was prevalent throughout the nation ; and Queen Eli¬ zabeth, who without hefitation ufed bafe money for Ireland, yet fcrupled at coining copper for England. This want of fmall coin occafioned fuch an increafe of private tokens for halfpennies and farthings, that it be¬ came a ferious obje& to government; and in 1594a cop¬ per coinage was ferioufly thought of. This year a fmall copper coin was ftruck about the fize of a filver two¬ pence, with the queen’s monogram on one fide, and a rofe on the other; the running legend on both fides being the pledge of a halfpenny. Of this there are patterns both in copper and filver, but both of them foon fell into difufe. On the 19th of May 1613, King James by royal proclamation iffued farthing to¬ kens. They are generally of the fame fize with the two pence, with two feeptres in faltier furmounted with a crown, and the harp upon the other; with an intention, as it would feem, that if they were refufed in England they might pafs in Ireland. In 1635 Charles 1. coined thofe with the rofe inftead of the harp ; but the circulation of thefe was entirely flopped by the vaft number of counterfeits which appeared, and by the king’s death in 1648. After this the pri¬ vate tokens began again to circulate, till put a flop to by the coinage of farthings in 1672. The workman- fhip of the tokens is quite contemptible. In 1672 the halfpence as well as the farthings which had been ftruck two years before began to circulate. They were of pure Swedilh copper, the dyes engraved by Rocttier ; and they continued till the year 1684, when fome difputes arofe about the copper lately obtained from theEnglilh mines. Tin farthings were coined with a ftud of copper in the centre, and inferibed round the edge as the crown pieces, with nummorum famulus-, 1685 or 1686. In 1685 halfpence of the fame kind were coined; and the tin coinage continued till the year 1692, to the value of more than L. 65,000; but next year the tin was all called in by government, and the capper coinage recommenced. The farthings of Queen Anne are all trial pieces excepting thofe ®f 1714, the laft. year of her reign. “ They are (fays Mr Pinkerton) of exquifite workmanftiip, exceeding moft copper coins either ancient or modern, and will do honour to the engraver Mr Croker to the end of time. The one, whofe reverie is Peace in a car, pax missa per orbem, is the moft etteemed ; and next to it the Britannia under a portal.. The other half- pence and farthings are lefs valuable. 23. Scotland. Silver pennies of Alexander I. who reigned in 1107, are believed to exift ; and there cer¬ tainly are fome of Alexander II. in 1214. There are hkewife coins of David in 1124; but perhaps none of Malcolm IV. his fucceffor, whofe reign was-very fhort; There are many coins of William I. in. 1165; and a large hoard of his pennies was found at Invernefs in 1780. The money of Scotland continued to be of the fame value with that of England till,tlie . country was drain.- A L S. 3^ ed by the vaft ranfom of David II. after which it be- Modern: came necefiary to reduce its fize ; and fo much did this diminution affecl England, that Edward III. found himfelf obliged to leffen the Engliih coin alfo. The diminution of the Scottiih coin, however, continued ftill to go on until it became imprailicable to keep- par with that of England. In the firft year of Ro¬ bert III. it pafled only for one half its nominal value in England : in 1393, Richard II. ordered it only to go for the weight of the genuine metal it contained. In 1600 it had funk to fuch a degree as to pafs only for a twelfth part of the Englifh money, and conti¬ nued at that low ebb till the coinage of Scotland was entirely cancelled by the Union of the two king¬ doms. Of filver coins we have only pennies till the year t 293, when Edward I. having coined halfpence and farthings, Alexander III. of Scotland coined alfo halfpence, of which we have a few, but no farthings are to be met with ; but there are filver farthings of Robert I. and David II. The latter introduced the groat and half-groat, which completed the fet df Scbt- ti(h filver. It continued unaltered till the time of Queen Mary, when they all ceafed to be coined in filver, on account of the high price of that metal. In 1553 {hillings were firft coined, with the buft of the queen on one fide and the arms of France and Scotland on the other. The filver crown was firft coined in 1565, which went for 30 s. Scots; lefftr pieces of 20 s. and 10s. having likewife.beeij ftruck,. and marks of filver, worth 3:8. 4 d. Englifii, were alfo coined about the fame time. Thefe coins have upon them the marks xxx. xx. x. to denote their value. - They are commonly called Cruickftone. dollars, from the palm-tree upon them, rniftaken for a remarkable yew at Cruickfton near Glafgow, where Henry Darn- ley refided. It is deferibed, however, m the aft as a palm,, with a “ fhell-padoc” (a tortoife) crawling up; This alludes to Darnley’s marriage with the queen, as the motto from Propertius Dat Gloria Vires alfo implies. The motto Nemo me Impune Laces set firft appears on the Scottiftr coins in 1778,.and the in¬ vention isgiven to the celebrated Buchanan; In 1582, the crown of an ounce weight went for 40 s. Scots* and was accordingly marked XL. ; in 159-7 the mark was L. the Scottifh money being then only one-tenth of the Englilh : the mark was LX in 1601, the value being then reduced to .one twelfth, at which it has ever fince continued. In the time of Charles I. half marks, 40 and 20 penny^pieces, were coined. In 1675 the Scottifh dollars firft appeared,. in value 56 s. Scots* with, halves and quarters of proportional value. In 1686,. James VII. coined 60,. 40, 20, 10, and 5 Si pieces; but only thofe of 4pand Tos. are known,, with thefe numbers under the buft. At the Union of the kingdoms, ail the Scottifti coins were called in* and recoined at Edinburgh, with the mark, e under- the buft to diftinguifti it;, fince which„there has been no coinage in. Scotland. The Sccttifti-filver coins are in .general equal, if not fuperior,. in the workmanfhip to the Englilh. Gold'was .firft. iffued by Robert II. about 30 years- after Edward III. of England had coined the fame metal in that country. The pieces were at firft called: St Andrew’s, from the figure of that tutelar Saint upon. MEDAL S. Tables, upon the crdt's, and who appears on the obverfe with the arms of Scotland, and on the reverfe a lion in a Ihield. The lion was another name for the largeft gold coin in Scotland, from the arms of the kingdom upon it. The next was the unicorn, under-James HI.; which were followed by the bonnet-pieces of James V. Thefe laft are of admirable workman iliip, being almoft equal to the ancient coins in. this refpedt. In imita¬ tion of the French, the monarch we fpeak of dimi- niihed the fize of the coin without leflening its weight; an improvement .not adopted by the Engliflt for a •whole century. The laft gold coined in Scotland was ■ the piftole and half piftole, of twelve and fix pounds Scots. Thefe coins have the fun under the head. The gold coins of Scotland fell in the fame proportion with the filver. The copper coinage cf'Scotland is of more early date than that, of England. It was preceded by mo¬ ney of billon, or, copper wafhed with filver, called black ; money. James III. firft coined black farthings in 1466 ; and this is recorded by hiftorians as one of his greateft faults. This kind of coinage, however, con¬ tinued as late as the reign of James VI. In his time the true copper coinage began ; but as the value, of Scottifh money was now declined almoft to the ut- moft, the pieces fuddenly affumed a form almoft re- fembling that of the French coins. The bodle, fo called from Bothwell the mintmafter, being equal in fize to the Hard, and worth two pennies Scottifh, was ftruck. The billon coin, formerly called bas-p'iece, and worth fix pennies Scots, was now coined in cop¬ per, and termed the haw-bee. Thus it correfponded with the French half fol and Englifh halfpenny, ;the Scots penny being now equivalent to the French de¬ nier. Some pieces named Atkivfons were coined by James VI. in 1582, when the Scottifh money was to the Englifh as I to 8 ; but on its being flill farther reduced, they went for 8 pennies, a third more than the value of the baw~bee. Befides thefe there were the hardie and plack, the former being worth three and the latter four pennies Scots. This coinage con¬ tinued through the reigns of Charles I. and II. but Scottish coins of the former are, perhaps, the fcarceft of any. 24. Ireland. The firft coins introduced into this king¬ dom feem to have been tbofe of the Danes, and which have only a number of ftrokes around them inftead of letters. In the tenth century, however, this coinage had been confiderably improved ; and in 930 and 994 there are pennies ftruck in Dublin, with the infcrip- tion on Dvfli or Dyfli, Dujlin or Dyflin being the Danifh name of that city. There are iikevvife coins of the Irifh princes themfelves, and of the Englifh monarchs, ftruck in Ireland as early as the ninth cen¬ tury ; and it i; aflerted by fome, that Irelan* even in thefe days had been conquered by England ; of which, indeed, thefe coins feem to be a proof. None of the Inih coins of Henry II. are to be met with, but we have fome of the coins of John ; and from his time to that of Henry V. the Irifh coins are known by a triangle inclofmg {.he king’s head, which;appears alio upon the coins of other nations at this period- The harp does not appear upon the Irifh coins till the time of Henry VIII. Till the time of this monarch, the Englifh and Iriih coins are the fame; but the fame de- NJ 20!. bafement of the coin which at that time took place in Modern England extended alfo to Ireland ; but in 1601 copper ^"im. halfpence and farthings were coined alfo for this king- " , " U dom. Thefe circulated in Ireland when James VI. iffued his farthing-tokens of copper, the latter being of two fizes, that if they failed in England they might be fent to Ireland as pennies and halfpence. In 1635 a mint was eftablifhed in Dublin by Charles I. but it was flopped by the Irifh maflacre, and the many dif- turbances which followed ; ftnce which time the fcheme has not been refumed. After the maffacre, St Pa¬ trick’s halfpence and farthings were coined by the Pa- pifts, bearing the legends Flore at Rex, and on the reverfe Ecce Grex ; on the farthing Quiescat Plebs. Copper-tokens were ftruck by towns and tradefmen, as in England and Scotland. In 1680, half¬ pence and farthings were iffued by authority, with the harp and date. In'1689, James II. having invaded Ireland, inftituted a mint, and coined fhillings and half-crowns of all the refufe metal he could find, par¬ ticularly fome brafs guns were employed, whence the coinage is commonly called gun-money. Even this metal, however, foon became fo fcarce, that a diminu¬ tion in its fize is quite apparent from June 1689 to July 1690; and as the month of their mintage is marked upon them, this decreafe is eafily perceived. In March 1690, pennies of lead mixed with tin were iffued ; and on the 15 th of June the fame year, crowns of white metal were coined; but thefe are now very fcarce. In 1722, the patent for coining halfpence and farthings was given to William Wood, which excited fuch difcontent in Ireland. From the fmall fize allow¬ ed by the patent to thefe pieces, it was fuppofed that the patentee would have gained 60,0001. but as he caufed them to be ftruck of a fize Hill fmaller, his gains were eftimated at 100,000 1. The coins, how¬ ever, are of admirable workmanfhip, and very fine copper, bearing the beft portrait of king George I. to be found any where. Sir Ifaac Newton, at that time at the head of the mint, declared that they were fuperior to the Engliih coins in every thing except the fize. In 1737 the Irifh halfpence and farthings, with the harp on the reverfe, were coined, and continue to the prefent time. In 1760, there was fuch a fcarcity of copper coin, that fome private perfons applied for leave to coin halfpence, which appeared with a very bad portrait of George II. and the words Voce Pe¬ ru li around it. No gold or filver has been coined in Ireland fince the maflacre of 1641. Table V. Modern Medals, properly fo called. 1. Scottifh medals. Thefe take the lead in the pre¬ fent article, the firft modern medals of gold being thofe of David II. ftruck between the years 1330304 1370. Only two of them now exift; one in the col- le&ion of Mr Barker of Birmingham, and the other in that of Dr Hunter. In 1478, there is a medai of James III. fent to the flirine of St Amboife in France-. It is deferibed as ;of two inches and a third in diame¬ ter ; the weight near two ounces ; having on the ob- verfe a beardleB king, with long hair, fitting on a throne, holding in one hand a naked fword in the other a Afield, with the Scottifh arms. On the bor¬ ders of the canopy above the throne is an inferipuon in Gothic letters, in mi deffen, being corrupt French Tables. MED French for In my defence | a common motto in the Medal?. Scottilh arms. Above the canopy is. Villa Ber- ‘--"“v—^rici : the reverfe bears St Andrew and his crofs, SALVUM FAC POPULUM TUUM DOMINE. There IS alfo a medal of James IV. in the collar of St Michael, having on the reverfe a Doric pillar furmounted by a young Janus, Handing on a hill, beyond which ii the Pea, and land on either fide. This, however, is by Pome fufpe&ed to be a forgery. The moft remarkable Scottiih medals are thofe of the unfortunate Mary. The firft is properly French, having been iffued at her coronation as queen of France, along with her hufband king Francis II. On the obverfe of this piece there are portraits of Francis and Mary, face to face, with three legends around them, the outermoft containing their titles; the middle one the following fentence: hora nona dominus j. h. s. eipiravit belli clamans; the innermoft the name of the city (Paris). On the reverfe are the arms of France and Scotland. Fine teftoons were alfo coined upon the fame plan, and are now fo rare that Dr Hunter gave ten guineas for one he has in his colle&ion. The fame portraits appear on the fine crown of Mary and Henry, in 1565, which is fo rare as to be dleemed a medal of the higheft va¬ lue ; and Mr Pinkerton imagines, that if brought to a fale it would bring 40 or 50 guineas. Another remarkable medal of Mary reprefent- her full faced, and weeping, with the infeription, O God GRANT PATIENCE IN THAT I SUFFER VRANG. The reverfe has in the centre, Quho can compare with ME IN GRIEF, I DIE AND DAR NOCH'T SEEK RE¬ LIEF; with this legend around, Hourt not the (figure of a heart) quhais joy thou art. There are alfo many counters of this unfortunate princefs, being thin filver-pieces of the fize of a (hilling. “They all appear (fays Mr Pinkerton) to have been done in France by Mary’s direction, who wa fond of de¬ vices. Her cruel captivity could not debar her from intercourfe with her friends in France, who muft with pleafure have executed her orders, as affording her a little confolation.” The coronation medal of Charles I. ftruck at Edin¬ burgh for his inauguration, June 18. i66y, is remark¬ able as being the only one ever coined of Scottifh gold, and the firft in Britain Itruck with a legend on the edge. With refpeft to the workmanfhip, it is inferior to Simon’s. Of thefe medals only three are known to exift, of which one is in the Mufeum. It is not un¬ common in (liver; in which cafe it fometimes wants the legend on the edge. 2. Italian medals. Thefe appear in the 15th cen¬ tury, and from that time fucceffively in moft Euro¬ pean countries. Vittore Pifano, a painter of Verona, is celebrated as the reftorer of the art, but it remains to be accounted for how the medals of king David al¬ ready mentioned came to exifl fo long before. Mr Pinkerton confiders this artifl rather as an inventor than a reftorer, his medals having no refemblance to the ancient coins, as being large, and all call. They were fit ft modelled in wax, then a mould taken from the model in fine fand, and other ingredients. After a good caft was procured, it was touched up, and made a model for the reft. Thefe medals of Pifano are almofl always inferibed Opus Ptfani Piaoris. The Vol.XI. Parti. A L S. 4* portraits of a great number of illuflrious men were Modem done by him in this manner ; .and in the Britifh Mu- a ~~ feum is a large brafs medal of Pifano by himfelf.— J Other artifts were Boldu, Marefcotto, Matthsens de Paftus, Sperandes, Mifaldone, &c. Towards the end of the century, however, the medals began to affume a more elegant appearance ; and the Papal ones are not only the molt elegant but the mofl ancient feries of all the modern medals. The improvement began in the reign of Alexander V I. fo famous for his own crimes, and thofe of his nephew Casfar Borgia. His fucceffors, Julius II. Leo X. Hadrian VI. and Cle¬ ment VII. had many of their medals defigned by Ra¬ phael, Julio Romano, and other eminent painters, and the engraving executed by artifls of equal merit. Among thefe were the celebrated Cellini, and the noted Paduan forgers of Roman coins, Cavino and Baffiano. In 1644 Cormanni, a medallic artiit, was imprifoned on account of a piece which reprefented the Pope upT on one fide, and Olympia Maidalchina, the relation of his holinefs, on" the other- The unfortunate Cor¬ manni poifoned himfelf. About this time the family of the Hamerani, originally from Germany, began to engrave the papal medals ; which they did with fur- prifing merit for feveral generations. Each of the daughters did a fine medal, as we are informed by Venuti. Befides the papal medals, there are many iflued by the various Hates of Italy. There are medals o(' Frederic II. of Sicily in 1301, of feveral Venetian ge¬ nerals in 1509, of Alfonfo duke of Ferrara in 1511, and of the celebrated Andrew Daria in 528. 3 French medals. Till the reign of Louis XIV. the medals of this country are neither fine nor nume¬ rous ; but this monarch exceeds all modern princes in this way. Many of his pieces are well defigned and executed, though objectionable on account of their falfehood. 4. Danifli medals. Thefe appear of ChriHian II. in ij 16, of Frederic' and Sophia in 1542, of Frede¬ ric I. and ChriHian III. in bonnets worn in the 16th century. The elephant of the houfe of Oldenburg is frequent upon Danifh medals. 5. Swedifii medals ''hefe begin with GuHavus Vafa ; and feveral of ChriHina are likewife to be met with. There are alfo fome curious ones of Charles XIL 6. Dutch medals Thefe begin in < 566; and many of them are remarkable for maps and plans, which muH be very intereHing to poilerity. “ Had the Greeks and Romans (fays Mr Pinkerton) given us maps and plans, what a fine fyllem of ancient geography and topo¬ graphy a cabinet of medals muH have been!’’ 7. Medals of Spain, Portugal, and Germany. The Spanifh medals began with Gonfalo in 503, many of which are curious and intereHing. Under Cha V. there are many curious'Spanifh medals; but thofe of Germany begin with Frederic in 14J4. :'hey are ex¬ tremely numerous ; as we may eafily fuppofe from the greatnefs of the empire, and the various Hates which compofe it. There is a famous medial of SebaHian king of Portugal, famous for his unfortunate expedi¬ tion into Africa in 1578; with his bull, full face, and three quarters in length. On the reverfe is a (hell-fi(h in the fea, with the moon and (even Hars, bearing the infeription Serena Calsa pavent. There is alfo a F curioua 42 > M E D Modern curious !o^engc-(Ti?.pccl coin of the fame with tlie arms Medals. of portUgal, and the king’s name and title : On the ^ reverfe is a crofs with the infciiption In hoc signo VINCES, 1578. 8. Satyric medals Thefe began almoft as foon as the knowledge of the art of coining medals was revived. They feem to have been almoft unknown to the an¬ cients. One indeed of the Emperor Gallienus is fup- pofed to have been fatyric. It has on the front the emperor’s butt, with the infcription Gallien.e aug. the reverfe is Peace in a car. Pax Ubique; but this has been proved to be only a blundered coin. Some other ancient medals, however, are not liable to this obje&ion. The firft modern fatyric medal publifhed was that of Frederic king of Sicily in. 1501 againft his antagonift Ferdinand king of Spain. It has on one fide the head of Ferdinand, with the infcription Ferdinandus r. ar. vetus vulpes orbis ; on the reverfe a wolf carrying off a ftieep, Jvgvm mjevm svave est et onvs mevm leve. Many others have been ftruck, of which the wit would now perhaps be difficult to be found out: but of all nation- the Dutch have moft diftinguifhed themfelves in this way j and paid very dear for their condmft, as they brought upon themfelves by one or two fatyric medals the whole power of France under Louis XIV. q Engliih medals. The firft of thefe is in the duke ef Devonffiire’s colleftion. It is of a large fize, and done on the plan of the early Italian medals. It has on the reverfe the arms of Kendal, with the infcrip¬ tion TEMPORE OBS1DION1S TURCORUM, MCCCCLXXX. On the other fide is a portrait with 10. kendal rhodi t v r c V p e l l e r I v s It wa found laft century in Knaref* borough foreft; but Mr Pinkerton has no doubt of its having been done in Italy. The next is that of Henry VIII. in 1545, and is of gold, larger than the erown-piece, with the king’s head upon the obverfe, and three legends within each other, including his titles, See. The reverfe contains two inferiptions, de¬ claring him to be the head of the church ; the one in Hebrew, the other in Greek. It was imitated exa&ly by Edward VI. whole coronation-medal is the firft we have. There are two medals of Philip and Mary, whofe execution is tolerably good; but thofe of Eli¬ zabeth are very poor. There are good medals of James I. and his queen ; with a fine one of Charles I. and Henrietta, though the workmanlhip is much in¬ ferior to the antique. There are many good medals of Charles, with various devices upon their reverfes. Under the commonwealth the celebrated Simon pro¬ duced medals which are defervedly reckoned the moft admirable pieces of modern workmanihip. There are many good medals of Charles 11. James II. and .Wil¬ liam III. Some are alfo found of James after his ab¬ dication. Some fine gold, filver, and copper medals, were iffued in the time of Queen Anne ; the two laft affording a feries of all the great a&ions of the duke of Marlborough. About the year 1740, a feries of medals was engraved in London by Daffier, a native of Geneva, containing all the kings of England; being 36 in number. They are done upon fine copper, and executed with great tafte. There are befides many A L S. Tables. medals of private perfons in England; fa thafit may Ahbrevia- juftly be faid, that this country for medals exceeds al- tions- moft every other in Europe. " * ""l- To this account of modern coins and medals we lhall add that of another fet called Jitge piecesy and which were iffued during the time of a fiege in cafes of urgent neceffity. Thefe were formed of any kind of metal; fometimes of no metal; and Patin mentions a remarkable one ftruck at Leyden in 1 ^74, when the place was befieged by the Spaniards. It was of thick paper or pafteboard, having a lion rampant, with this infcription, pvgno pro patria, 1574; and on the reverfe, Lvgdvnvm Batavorvm. There are various fiege-pieces of Charles I. both in gold and filver, fome of the latter being of the value of zo ftiillings The nummi brafteati are a fpecies of modern coins fomewhat between counters and money; and have their name from the word bractea, a fpangle or thin bit of metal. They are commonly little thin plates of" filver, ftamped as would feem with wooden dies upon one fide only, with the rude impreffion of various fi¬ gures and inferiptions. Moft of them are ecclefiaftic, and were ftruck in Germany, Switzerland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and a few in Poland. They con¬ tinued to be in ufe in Germany till the end of the 15th century; and fome are ftill ufedin Switzerland at this day. Table of Abbreviations vfed in the Legends of Medals ; from Mr Pinkerton. A. Athens, Argos, Aulus, A- fylum; pi imi or firit; as Eptcnav A. Atritz;, “ Kphe- fians, firft people of Alia” A. Abbaffus, Abdera, Abydus on Hcllefpont AB. Abydns in Egypt ABT. Abydus on Heliefpont, A0. A<3E. Athens Air. Aegina Airosno. Aigofpotamos AIA. Aelius, Aelia Capitolina AIN. Aenos AK.-AKPATAN. Agrigentum AKI. Aciliupi AKT. AdHum AAE. Alexandria AM. Amyntas AMBP. Ambracia AM!. Amphilochia AN0. AvbvTruTov, Proconful ANTI2. Antiffa ANA. Ana&oria ANTI. Antium AN. Ancyra ANT, Antoninus, Antioch AT. Axu- in Crete AON. Aonitae AoTE. Avenio, fell. ATI. Appiu i AHA. Apamea. AITOi Apollonia AIITA. Aptara AP. Aradus, Harma APrE. Argennos APT. Argos API. Aric.mda APIM Ariminum AP2I. Arfinoe APT. Aryca. APX. Apxugtvs or high priett or niagiftrate , A2IAPX. Afiarchs, prefidents of the games of Afiii(B) AT. Afylum A. T. UpoToi 'Xvpia.c, Firft of Syria ATK. Afcalon AT. Atabyrium aTAP. Atari];® ATT. Auguftus ATPHA. Aurelius AT. ATT. AuTOxparop, Emp*» ATTON. Avroioftoi, enjoying their own laws Al. Aphyta AP. Afncarus AX. Achaii B B. Bouxnr, Council: Berytus: Bithynia BATH A AO. Bagadaonia BAA. Valerius BH. Berytus BITON. Bitontum- BOI. Boeoria BPTN. Brundufmm BT. Byzantium r r. TP. TP AM. Grammaticus, or keeper of the records T. Gaius, or Caius FA. Gailus, Galerius, Gallienus r. rtapipaw, Ihuftrious TEA. (b) There were alfo Syriarchte, Lyciarcbse, Gahtarchse, Bithyniarchse, Cappadociarchse, &c. Morel Spec. Tables. Abbrevia TEA, Gelas TEP. GermaiiicAii , FN. Gneius roPTT- Gortyna FPA. Gravifca A A. Decimuo, Dymat AAK. Oacicus A AM. Damafcu* AAP. Dai danum AH. Anpoi, the people AHMAPX. ESOT2. with Tli- bunitian power AE. Dccelia AEK Decius AEP. Derbe in Lyoaonia AH, Delos AI. Diofpoiis APE- Drepanum ATP. Dyrrachiuni E E Eryce E. EPE2. Erefus FAET. Eleufis EAET0. EAivSfpoi, Free Em. Epidaurus EPI Enza in Caria EPX- firchia EPT. Erythras ET. ETO. Erouf, Year ET. Etennain Pamphylia EX. Exova-ia, Power ET.ETBO. Euboea ETE. Evo-i^r, Pious ETT. Happy E4>. E<»E. Ephefus Z ZA. Zacynthus ZANKA. Zancle, Meffana an- ciently fo called H H. Eliutn irr. H >.(«»»,-, Prefident hPAK. Heraclea & ©A. Thafiis ©E. ThefpLae ©E2. Theffalonica ©E. ©HB. Thebaj I. IEP. Itpx;, Sacred JEPAPT. Hverapytha IKAP. Hiccara I At. Ilium tor. Julis a city, or Julius IOTA. Julia mA. Hippana IP. Irene Inf. Pellerin. IX. U'us, Iftisea K K. Cains; Kou. Cephalajilis KI. Cianus, CibiEum KIA. Cilbiani KA. C'.ao: x, Claudius KAA. Olazomene Km. Cmdus MED KO, Corinth koin. Kcuvov, Community KOA. Komvix(, Colony, Colo* phon Kom. Commodus KOP. Corcyra KP. Cragus in Lycia KPA. Cranos KPH. Crete Kth. Gtemenae, Pell. KT. Cuma, Cydonium, Cyoa KT©. Cythnus KTET. Cyprus KTP. Cyrene A. or L. Aux«C«»rof, Year A. Lucius AA. Lacedaemon AAM. Lamea; Lampfacus AAP. Lariffa AAPI. Larinum AE. AET. Leucas AEON. Leontium AH M. Lemnos Ain. Lipara AITI. Liviopolis AO. AX1K. Locri AOF, Longone ATF. ATK. Lydus M M. Marcus, Malea, Megalopo¬ lis, Mazaka ’ MA. Maronea, Maflilia, Mace¬ donia MAT. Maguefia MAKPO. Macrocephali MAM. Mamertini MAXX. Maflilia MAZ. Mazara ME. Menelais, on Syrian regal MENEK. Menecrates ME. MET. Megara, Megalopo¬ lis Melite MET. MtyxMf, Great MEX. Meflana META. Metapontum M. MHTPO. Metropolis MI. Miietus MK. Mazaka of Cappadocia, on coins of Mithridates VI. MOP. Morgantia MT. Mycenae MTP. Mj rlea MTTI. Mytilene N N. Naupados NA3. Naxos N A T A PX. 'Navapxitoi, enjoying a fea-port NE. Nemea N. NfiriK. Neocori NEOn. Neopolis. NEP. Nerva NIK. Nicaeum, Nicomedia NTE. Nyfaei, on coins of Scy- thopolis, Pell. o Ol. Oethaei ON. p»T»f, being. onEA. Opelius on. Opus OPT. Orycus OPX. Orchomenus OTn.orTn. OuTarOfor Trce- rof, Conful OTEP, Verus OTH. Verus OTEXII. Vefpafianus OTITEA. Vitellius ©ardu XE. Seriphus, Segefte XEB. Xf^arTof, Auguftus XEA. Selinus, Seleucia XEnr. Septimius XI. Siphnos. XIA. Side XlNn. Sinope 43 XMT. Smyrna Abbrevia- XTP. XTPA. Xrfarsysf, Prx- tions. 2TB. Sybaris * XT. Xtpa. Syracufe XTP. Syria XIF. Solx. r T. Titus TABAA. Tabala T’A. TANA. Tanagra TAP. Tai-entum, Tarfut Tatp. Tauromenum TE. Tementis TEP. Terina TH. Tenus TI. TIB. Tiberiu* TPA. Trallis TPI. Tripolis TPO. Troizene TTAN. Tyana TT. Tyndaris. TTP. Tyre (monogram) T TE. TEA, Velia Til. that. Tir.ror, Conful . Philip; Phceflus, Philun* A. Phafelis OAP. Pharfalus •SI. Vibius, Philippopolis •PINE. Phineium A. Flavius «I>OK. Phocxum OTA. Fulvia T. Phycus in Cyrene. X X. Chios XAA. Ghalcis XEP. Cherfonefus XI. Chytri in Crete. •r Oi 6 7 q or q 90. poo. Examples. I is 10: add A or I, and IA makes it: folB, m ir, 13, &c. K is 20, KA, ax, &c. PI A makes m. The ling* lilh word air marks tlie grand initial numerals. On coins the. numeral- are often placed in retrograde Older;, which makes no difference in the value, as every leiret is appropriated to its num¬ ber. Thus TAF or FAT imply the fame, 333. iiut this advan¬ tage being unknown to he Roman numerals and Arabic ciphers, is apt to puzzle the beginnei. Roman Coins. A. aulus: in the exergue it implies the firu mint, as an t. A. coined at An¬ tioch in the firft mint. A. A. A. F. F. Auro,: argen- to, uEre, Flando, Feri- undo. A. or an. Annus. a. a. Apollo Augufti. a. f. A. n. Auli filius, Auli nepos. abn. Abnepos. act. Adiacus, or A&ium. AD FRV. EMV, Ad flUgCS emundas. adiab. Adiabenicus. adop. Adoptatus. ADQ^ Adquihta. adv Adventus. A ed. Aides. aed. p. Aidilitiapoteftatc. aed. s. Aides facrag. aed. cvr. Aidilis Curulis. aed. pl. Aidilis Plebis. a el. ALlius. AEM. 44 Abbrevia- AEM. or A!MiL. jF.milius. aet. Kternitas. APR. Africa, orAfricanus. A lb in. Albinus. ALiM.iTAL.Alimenta Ita¬ lic. Ann. avg. Aniiona Au- gufti. A. n. p. p. Annum Novum Fauftum Felicem. anic. Anicius. ANN. DCCCL^JIII. NAT. vrb. p. cir. con. An¬ no 864Natali Urbis Po- puloCircenfesconuituti. ant. avg. Antonius Au¬ gur. ant. Antonius,, or Anto- ap. Appius. A. p. f. Argento Publico Feriundo. A POP. FRVG. AC. A Po- pulo Fruges Accepts. AQiOr aqx. Aquiliu . aqva mar. Aqua Martia. arab. ADQ;, Arabia Ad- quifita. arr. Arrius. avg. Augur, Auguftus, Augufta. AVG. d. 7. Auguflus Divi Filius. AVGG. Two, Augufti. avggg. Three Augufti. avr. or avrel. Aurelius. B B. The mark of the fecond mint in any. city. bon. event. BosusEven- tus. b. r.p.nat. Bono Reipub- licae Nato. brit. Britannieus. brvt. Brutus. C c. Caius, Colonia. c. a. Caefarea Augufta. c. cae. or cabs. Casfar. caess. Caefares. carth. Carthage. cen. Cenfor. e e n s. p. Cenfor Perpetuus. cest. Ceftius, or Ceftia- nus. cir. con. Circum Condi- dit, or Circenfes Con-- cefiit. CIVIB. ET SIGN. MILIT. A. PARTH. RECVP. CivibuS et Signis Militaribus a Parthi' Recuperatis. cn Cneius. eeEL. Ccelius,. M E D CON. ob. Conftantinopoli Obfignata, or Comtan- tinopoli Ofticina fecun- da, or Conflata Obryzo. col. Colonia. c o n . s v o. Confervatori fuo. concord. Concordia. cl. v. Clypem Votivus. comm. Commodus. clod. Clodius. cl. or cl a vd. Claudius, cos. Conful. coss. Confules. corn. Cornelius. cvr. x. f. Curavit Dena- rium Faciendum. D d. Decimus, Divus, De- ftgnatu.s. sac. Dacicus. d. f. Dacia felix. s. m. Diis Manibus. DEs.orDEsiG. Defignatus. dict. Diftator. dom it. Domitianus. s. n. Dominus nofter. did. Didius. d. p. Dii Penates. dv. Divus. E eid. mar. Idus Martiae. ex. cons. d. Ex Confenfu Decuriorum. ex. s. c. Ex Senatus Con- fulto. eq^ ordin. Equeftris Or- dinis. ex. a. pv. Ex Argento, or P^blica. EXER. etr. Etrufcus. F F. Filius, or Filia, or Felix, or Faciundum, orFecit. fel. Felix. felic. Felicitas. fl. Flavius. flam. Flamen. fort. red. Fortunae Re- duci. fovri. Eourius forFurius, fontj Fonteius. frvgif. Frugiferae (Cere- ri). fvl. Fulvins. fvlg. Fulgerator. G G. Gneius, Genius, Gau- dium. ga. Gaditanus. G. d. Gerraanious Dacicus. gen. Genius. germ. Germanic us. gl. e. r. Gloria Exercitus Ramani. A L S. GL. P. R. Gloria Populi Romani. goth. Gothicus. g. p. r. Genio Populi Ro¬ mani. G. t. a. Genius Tutelaria JEgypti, or Africae. H hel. Helvius. hel. Heliopolis. her. Herennius, or He- rennia. ho. Honos. hs. Seftertius. I i. Imperator, Jovi, Julius. ian. clv. Janum clulit for clauftt. imp. Imperator. impp. Imperatores. i. s. m. r. Juno Sofpita, Mater or Magna Re¬ gina. it. Italia, Iterum. iTe. Iterum. ivl. Julius or Julia. IVST. Juftus. i-i. s. Seftertius. l. O. M. SACR. Jovi Opti¬ mo, Maximo, Sacrum. u. vir. Duumvir. m. vir. r. p. c. Triumvir Reipublicae Conftituen- dae. mi. vir. a. p. f. Quatu- orvir, or Quatuorviri, Auro, or Argento, or ^Ere, Publico Feriundo. ivn. Junior. L L. Lucius. lat. Lr^-'nus. leg. propr. J /'gatusPro- praetoris. leg. i. &c. Legio Prima, See. lep. Lepidus. LENT. CVR. k. F. LentU- lus Curavit Denarium Faciundum. libero p. Libero Patri. l i b . p v b . Libertas Publica. Lie. Licinius. l. s. den. Lucius Sieinius Dentatus. lvc. Lucifera. lvd. cir. Ludi Circenfes. lvd. Eq. Ludi Equeftres. lvd. sae-c. f. Ludos S«- cularss Fecit. M m. Marcus, or Marius. mar. cl. Marcellus Clo¬ dius. H, f. Maroi Filius. Tabless'' M. OTAClfc, Marcia Ota- Abbreviaji- cilia. tlons* 1; mag. or magn. Magnus. mac. Macellum. max. Maximus. mar. Martia (aqua). mar. vlt. Marti Ultori. mes. Melfius. metal. Metallum. min at. Minatius. miner. Minerva. m. m. i. v. MunicipesMu- nicipii Julii Uticenfis. mon. or monet. Moneta. N N. Nepos or Nofter. n. c. Nobiliffimus Csefar. nat. vrb. Natalis Urbis. nep. N^pos. nep. red. Neptuno Re- duci. O o. Optimo. ob. c. s. Ob Gives Serva- tos. * of. Officina. opel. Opelius. orb. terr. Orbis Terra- rum. P p. or pot. Poteftafe. pac. orb. ter. Pacatori Orbis Terrarum. papi. Papius or Papirius. parth. Parthicus. perp. Perpetuu .' pert, or pertin. Pertinax. pesc. Pefcennius. p. f. Pius Felix. PL aet. Pketonius. p. l. n. Pecunia Londiiii Notata. p,lon. s. Pecuaia Londini p. m. or font. max. Pon- tifex Maximus. pomp. Pompeius. p. p. Pater Patriae. pr. Praetor. p. r. Populus Romanus. PRAEF. CLAS. ET. OR. MA- rit. Praefedtus Claffis et Orae Maritimae. princ. ivvent. Princeps Juventutis. priv. Privernum., proc. Proconful. prOn. Pronepos.. prop. Propraetor. PROQi Proquaeftor. prov. deor. Providentia Deprum. pvpien. Pupienus. Quintus, or Quaeftor. /£. t Ms/Ar™, .//<'&/<■«/or/erJ. MEDALS. /£. Plate CCXCjr. /. ' MEDALS. Elate C OXeUL 2(3. A A TJiA^AA.n tt A TOT O /v A A b ^ e ^ d ccfcFircv i>dpbDr,jt>> £ E£6EG«e f /=■ r G G 9 <> S L b 5-U G H h.H.li. I I E K. -U. i. U 4.^ 2<$ A.. . 'fc .-€. . CR.C^ . HE.FE . MA£* VY E . /AO. <5 .'o'. M./w, n. m-1. rn.'T0. m. xi*. rn. 1H.S0. »Af. w. va . h . u • ivr.p. iv.v^.H.w.n.ii. p. r. r./* . i>. /?.^ y2. n. 4. $. v^.^.-v.S.Z-A.E.X T. T. r. v. v. v. 11. vc. u. y- w. w.P.YT. b.f. P- p V • X . +. no zz.yc.<£. t- • y. y. 2 0. KG- he . TSJ w . |sp . REX . Tic • Rua\ . vc . T/t . T H • ©.!>.•»;). y .v.jy 4-3.P. thb.* . ■ Tables. MED AMrevia- c. M. V. I. Quintus C'X- tll>ns . cilius Metellus Pius Im- '' *v perator. q,. desig. Qunsftor Defig- natus. <2^ p. Quasftor Praetorius. ^ pr. Qiiseftor Provincia- lis. R r. Roma, Reftituit. recep. Receptis, or Re- ceptus. rest. Reftituit. rom. et avg. Romas et Augufto. r. p. Refpublica. S SAEC. AVR. Sasculum Au- reum.- saec.fel. SseculiFelicitas. sal. Salus. sall. Salluftia. sarm. Sarmaticus. s. c. Senatus Confulto. sc ip. asia. Scipio Afiati- cus. Sec. orb. Securitas Orbis sec. perp. Securitas Per- petua. sec. temp. Securitas Tern- porum. sen. Senior. sept. Septimius. ser. Servius. sev. Severus. sex. Sextus. sic. v. sic x. Sicut Quin- quennalia, fic Decenna- lia. sig. Signis. s. m. Signata Moneta. s. p. q^r. Senatus Popu- lufque Romanus. stabil. Stabilita (terra). svl. Sulla. T T. Titus, Tribunus. ter. Terentius, or Terti- um. temp. Temporum. ti. Tiberius. tr. or trev. Treveris. treb. Trebonianus. tr. mil. Tribunus Milita- ris. TR. P. or TRIB. POT. Tri- bunicia Poteftate. V v. Quintum. v. c. Vir Clariflimus. vesp. Vefpafianus. vib. Vibius. viCt. Viftoria. vn. vir. epvl. Septem- vir Epulonum. vil. pvb. Villa Publica. virt. Virtu;. vn. mr. Venerandse Me¬ moriae. VOT. X. MVLT. XX. VotlS Decennalibus Multipli- catis Vicennalibus. X x. Decern, Denarius. XV. VIR. SACR. FAQ., Qum- decim Vir Sacris Faci- undis. Abbreviations on the Exergue; from Banduri and Mo- naldini. Pinkerton. a. Officina Prima. ale. Alexandria. amb. Antioehenfis Mone¬ ta Secundse Officinae. an. ant. anti. Antiochia. ANB. Antiochiae Secunda OfF-ina : to anu. An- tiochiae OAava Officina. A. p. l. (In officina) Prima percufla Lugduni. aq^ aql. Aquileiae. Aq. o. b. f. Aquileiae Of¬ ficinae Secundae Fabrica. aq. p. s. Aquileiae Pecunia Signata. Aq. s. Aquileiae Signata. a. ar. arl. Arelate. A. sisc. Prima (in officina) Sifciae. B. sirm. Secunda Sirmii. *. s. L. c. Secunda. Signa¬ ta Lugduni. c. ©• Conftantinopoli No- comob. Conflata Moneta Obryzo. Only on gold or filver from a gold dye. con. Conftantinopoli. conob. Conflata Obryzo. Only on gold. cons. Conftarntinopoli. kart. Carthago k. ,o. Carthaginenfis Offi¬ cina. l. lc. lvc lvg. Lucduni, Lugduni. L. lon. Londini. l. p. Lugdunenfis vel Lon- dinenfis Pecunia. lvc p. s. Lugduni Pecu¬ nia Signata mops Mediolani Pecunia Signata. A L S. M. k. v. t.. Moneta Karta. ginenfis Urbis (in offici¬ na) Tertia. M. l. Moneta Lugdunenfis vel Londinenfis. mostt. Moneta Officinse Secundae Treverorum. mstr. Moneta SignataTre- veris. o. Officina. off. in. const. Officina Tertia Conftantinopoli. parl. Percufla or Pecunia Arelate. plon. PecuniaLondinenfis. plvg. Pecunia Lugdunen¬ fis. p. r. Pecunia Romana, or Percufla Romae. p. t. Pecunia Treverenfis. q. ar. Quindta Arelatenfis (officina). r. ro. rom. Romse. ra. Ravennoe. 4* ROPS. Rom* Pecunia Sigw AtibrevU- uata. tions. s. ar. Signata Arelate. v 1 s.. const. Signata Con¬ ftantinopoli. sis, Sifcise. ss. p. Sifcienfis Pecunia. sisc. v. Sifcia Urbs. sma. Signata Moneta An- tiochiae. s. m. her. Signata Moneta. Heracleae. s. m n. Signata Moneta Nicomedise. s. m. r. Signata Moneta Romae. s. t. Signata Treveris. tesob, i’eflalonicae Offici¬ na Secunda. theopo. Theopoli. tr. Treveris. trob. Treveris Officina Secunda. A Idft of Roman Colonies avhofe Coins remain ; and Ab¬ breviations on thefe Coins, Abdera in Spain. Acci in Spain. Achulla in Africa. iElia Capitolina in Judaea. Agrippina in Germany. Antiochia in Pifidia. in Syria. Apamea in Bithynia. Arna in Theflaly. Aftigi in Spain. Babba in Mauritania Tin- gitana. Berytus in Phoenicia. Bilbilis in Spain. Boftra in Arabia. Bracara Augufta in Spain. Buthrotum in Epirus. Cabellio in Gaul. Caefar-Augufta in Spain. Caefarea in Paleftine. Calagurris in Spain. Calpe in Spain. Camalodunum in Britaim Carrhae in Mefopotamia. Carteia in Spain. Carthago in Africa. Carthago Nova in Spain. Cafcantum in Spain. Caflandria in Macedon. Celfa in Spain. Clunia in Spain. Coillu in Numidia. Comana in Cappadocia. Corinthus in Greece. Cremna in Pifidia. Culla in Thrace., Damafcus in Celefyria. Dertofa in Spain. Deulton in Thrace. Dium in Macedon. Ebora in Spain. Edefla in Mefopotamia. Emerita in Spain. Emefa in Phoenicia. Ergavica in Spain. Germe in Galatia. Graccuris in Spain. Hadrumetum in Africa. Heliopolis in Celefyria. Hippo Regius in Africa. Iconium in Lycaonia. Ilerda in Spain. Illergavonia in Spain, Illeci in Spain, lol in Mauritania. Italica in Spain. Laelia in Spain. Laodicea in Syria Leptis in Africa. Lugdunum in Gaul. Neapolis in Paleftine. Nemaufu; in Gaul. Nefibis in Mefopotamia. Norba Caefarea in Mauri tanica. Obulco in Spain Oea in Africa. Olba in Pamphylia. Ofca iu Spain. Oficarda in Spain. Panormus in Sicily.. Pariuai in Myfia. Farlaia 46 .rtbbrevts. Parlais in Lycaom'a, . tl°n8, Patricia (Corduba) in - Pella in Macedon. Philippi in Macedon. Philippopolis in Arabia. Ptolemais in Phoenicia. Rufcino in Gaul.' Romula (Hifpalis) in Spain. Rhefasna in Mefopotamia. Sabaria in Hungary. Saguntum in Spain. Sebafte in Paleftine. Segobriga in Spam. Abbreviations MED Sidon in Phoenicia. Singara in Mefopotamia. Sinope in Pontus. Stobi in Macedon. Tarraco in Spain. Theflalonica in Macedon. Tradu&a (Julia) in Spain. Troas in Phrygia. Turiafo in Spain. Tyana in Cappadocia. Tyrusin Phoenicia. Valentia in Spain. Vienna in Gaul. Viminacium in Mcefia. Utica in Africa. Colonial Coins. acci. Accitana Colonia, Guadix in Spain. adi. Adjutrix legio. ael. mvn. coel. ./Elium Municipium Coela, near Sef- ios on the Hellefpont. AST. Aftigitana, Eceja in Andalufia. Ti. a. Braccara Augufti, Brague in Portugal. c. A. Csefaria Antiochiae. c. a. a. p. or patr. Colonia Augufta Aroe Patrenfis. cab. Cabellio. c. A. bvt. Colonia Augufti Buthrotum, in Epirus. ■c. A. c. Colonia Augufta Caefarea. c. A. i. Colonia Augufta Julia, Cadiz. c. A. E. Colonia Aug. Emerita, Merida. cal. Calagurris, Calahorra in Spain. c. A. o. A. f. Colonia Antoniana Oea Aug. Felix, Tri¬ poli in Africa. -c. A. pi. met. sid. Colonia Amelia Pia Metropolis Sidon. >c. A. r. Colonia Augufta Rauracorum, or Colonia Afta Regia: Augft in Switzerland, or Aft near Xeres de la Frontera in Spain. •c. c. A. Colonia Csefarea Augufta, Saragoffain Spain. 'C. c. col. lug. Claudia Copia Colonia Lugdunenfis. c. c. i. B. Colonia Campeftris Julia Babba, in Mau¬ ritania. -c. c. i. b. d. d. Colonia Campeftris Julia Babba, De- creto Decurionum. c. c. i. h. p. a. Colonia Concordia Julia, Hadrume- tina, Pia Augufta. c. civ. d. d. p. Corona Civica data Decreto Publico, •c. c. n. a. Colonia Carthago Nova Augufta. rc. c. n» c. d. d. Colonia Concordia, Norba Caefarea- na, Decreto Decurionum. -c. cor. Colonia Corinthus. c. c. t. Ducentefima Remiffa. c. g» s. Golonia Claudia Sabaria, in Hungary,. c. f. p. d. Colonia Flavia Pacenfis Develtum, DeveL turn in Thrace. c. c. i. h. p. a. Colonia Gemella Julia Hadriana, Pa- riana, Augufta. c. i. c. a. Colonia Julia Concordia, Apamea. •c. i. a. d. Colonia Julia Augufta Dertona, Tortona near Milan. c. i. av. Colonia Julia Aug. Cadiz. c. i. avg. f. sin. Colonia Julia Augufta Felix Sinope. e. i. B. Colonia Julia Baiba, in Mauritania. c. i. c. a. p. a. Colonia Julia Carthago Augufta Pi A L S. Tables. Antiqua, or Corinth, or Carthago Nova, AbbVevij- c. i. cal. Colonia Julia Calpe, Gibraltar. bout. C; i. f. Colonia Julia Felix, Cadiz. ^ c. i. g. a. Colonia Julia Gemella (c) Augufta. c4 i. i. A. Colonia Immunis Mice Augufta, E/cle in Spain. c. i. n. c. Colonia Julia Norba Csfareana, or Alcan¬ tara : fometimes it means Col. Julia Nova Carthago, c. i. v. Colonia Julia Valentia, Valencia in Spain. c. v. t. Colonia Vi&rix Varraco. c. l. i. cor. Colonia Laus Julia Corinthus. c. l. i. n. avg. Colonia Laus Julia Nova Augufta, Laus or Lodi in Lucania. c. m. l. Colonia Metropolis Laodicea, in Ccelefyria. co. dam. metro. Colonia Damafcus Metropolis. cohh. pret, vii. p. vx. f. Cohortes Pnetorianae Septi- mum Pise, Sextum Felices. coh. i. cr. Cohors prima Cretenfis. con. pret. phil. Cohors Praetoriana Philippenfium. col. ael. a. h. met. Colonia iElia Augufta Hadru- metina Metropolis, in Africa col. ael. cap. comm. p. f. Colonia iElia Capitolina Commodiana Pia Felix. col. alex. troas. Colonia Alexandriana Troas. col. amas. or ams. Colonia Amaftriana, in Paphlago- COL. ant. Antioch in Pifidia. col. arelat. sextan. Colonia Arelate Sextanorum, Arles. col. ast. avg. Colonia Aftigitana Augufta, Eceja in Spain. col. a,vg. fel. ber. Colonia Augufta Felix Berytus. col. avg. fir. Celonia Aug. firma, Eceja. col. avg. ivl. Philip. Colonia Augufta Julia Philip- penfis. cOl. avg. pat. trevir. Colonia Augufta Paterna Tre- virorum, Treves in Germany, fenl from Paternum in Italy. col. avr. kar. comm. p. f. Golonia Aurelia Karrhae , Commodiana Pia Felix, or Carneatum Commagene, or Carrhte in ffia. col. b. a. Colonia Braccara Augufta, Prague. col. bryt. l v. Colonia Berytus Legio Quinta. col. cabe. Colonia Cabellio. col. caes. avg. Colonia Caefarea Augufta, in Pale- JHne. col. camalodvn- Colonia Camalbdunum, England. COL. Gasilin. Colonia Cafilinum, Caflellazo in Italy. col. cl. ptol. Colonia Claudia Ptolemais, Acre in Phcenicia. col. -damas. metro. Colonia Damafcus Metropolis. col. f. i. a. p. barcin. Colonia Flavia Julia Augufta Pia, Barcino or Barcelona. col. fl. pac. devlt. Colonia Flavia Pacenfis Deul- tum, Develtum in Thrace. col. ha. me. t. Colonia Hadriana .Mercurialis Thae- nitana, Mercuriali, Fermo in Italy, and Thenes in Africa. . . . col h. (or hel. ) leg. h. Colonia Heliopolis Legio Heliopolitana. Col, hel. i. o. m. h. Colonia Heliopolis Jovi Optimo Maximo Heliopolitano. col. ivl. avg. c. i. f. coman. Colonia Julia Augufta Concordia Invi&a Felix Comanorum, drawn from Cow (c) Gemella implies a colony drawn from two others. ■5 Tables# M E D If^hhreyia- Concordia in Italy, andfenl to Comana in Cappadocia. i| col. ivL, avg. fel. cremna. Colpnia Julia Augufta j” v Felix Cremna, in Pampbylia. COL. IVL; CER. SAC. AVG. FEL. CAP. OECVM. ISE. HEL. Co- lonia Julia Certamen Sacrum Auguftum Felix Ca- pitolinumOecumenicum Ifelafticum Heliopolitanum. col. ivl. conc. apam. avg. d. d. Colonia Julia Con¬ cordia Apamea Augufta Decreto Decurionum. COL. ivl. pater, nar. Colonia Julia Paterna Narbo- nenfis. col. nem. Colonia Nemaufus. col. niceph. cond. Colonia Nicephorium Condita}. in Mefopotamia. COL. PATR. Colonia Patrenfis or Patricia, Patras in Greece, or Cordova in Spain. col. p. f. avg. f. caes. met. Colonia Prima Flavia Aug. Felix Caefarea Metropolis, in Pakjline. col. p. fl. avg. caes. METRO? p. s. p, fame as above, p. s. p. is Provinciae Syriae Paleftinre. col. pr. f. a. caesar. Colonia Prima Flavia Augufta Ciefarea, in Palejline. col. R. f. avg. fl. c. metrop. Colonia Romana Felix Aug. Flavia Caefarea Metropolis The fame. col. rom. Colonia Romulea, or Seville. col. rom. lvg. Colohia Romana Lugdunum. col. rvs. leg. vi. Colonia Rufcino Legio Sexta, Rouf- 1 , flIlon in France. col. sabar. Colonia Saburiae. col. sabas. Sebafte in Palejline. I col. ser. g. neafol. Colonia Servii Galbie Neapolis, in Palejline. col. v i. celsa, orcoL. vic. ivl. celsa. Colonia Vic- trix Julia Celfa, Kelfa in Spain. col. vie. ivl. lep. Colonia Viftrix Julia Leptis, in Africa. col. vim. an. i. or ii, &c. Colonia Viminacium Anno prime, Widtn in Servia. col. vlp. tra. Colonia Ulpia Trajana: Kellen, or , Warhal in Tranftlvania. co. p. f. coe. metro. Colonia Prima Flavia Caefarea Metropolis. co. p. i. a. Colonia Pacenfis Julia Augufta, or Col. O&aviana. c. r. i. f. s. Colonia Romana Julia Felix Sinope. c. t. t. Colonia Togata Tarraco. c v. il. Colonia Vicftrix Mice, Elche in Spain. o. Decurioneg. d. c. a. Divus Cief. Aug. pert. Dertofa. gen. col. ner. patr. Genio Coloniae Neroniame Pa¬ trenfis. A L S. 4. g* l. s. Genio Loci Sacrum. Exp!ana- m. h. illergavonia dyrt. Municipium Hibera filer- t!.on gavonia Dertofa, Tortofa in Catalonia. lJ ates' , m. m. 1. v. Municipes Municipii Julii Uticenfis. M. r. Municipium Ravennatium. mvn, cal. ivl. Municipium Calagurris Julia, in Spain. mvn. clvn. Municipium Clunia, Crunna in Spain- mvn, fane. jei.. Municipium Faneftre Aelium. Fano. mvn. stob. Municipium Stobenfe, Sobi in Macedon. mv. tv. Municipium Turiafo, in Spain. n. tr. alexandrianae col. bostr. Nerviae Trojan* Alexandrian* Goloni* Boftrse, in Palefline. sep. col. lavd. Septimia Colonia Laudicea, or Lao- dicea. sep. tyr. met. Septima Tyrus Metropolis, Explanation of the Plates. Fig. I. A Perfian Daric. Plates 2. A drachm of Egina. CCXCII, 3. A filver hemidrachm of Alexander the Great; rianpI 4. Tigranes the younger of Armenia, with his CCX ftfter. 5. One of the coins of the Arfacidae of Parthia. 6. A coin of the Safianidae of Perfia. Firft pub- lifhed by Mr Pinkerton. 7. Denarius of Cneius Pompey from Mr Pinker¬ ton,. reverfe. Received by Spain. 8. A brafs coin of Cunobelinus. 9. Pefcennius Niger. Struck at Antioch ; u- nlque. In Dr Hunter’s cabinet; publilhcd by Mr Pinkerton. 10. A filver coin of Caraufius. * 11. Reverfe of Claudius in ftrft brafs. 12. Reverfe of Adrian. 13. Of Antoninus Pius. 14. Of Commodus. 15. Of Severus. 16. A Saxon penny. 17. A Saxon ftyca. ^8. 19. Ancient pennies, fuppofed to be Scottifii. 20. A penny of William of Scotland. 21. A penny of Robert the Great. 22. An Irifti penny. 23. The gold penny of Henry III. 24. The large noble of the firft coinage of Ed* ward III. 25. The gold medal of David II. of Scotland. 26. The ryal of Queen Mary of Scotland. 27. Letters on Anglo-Saxon coins. 28. Abbreviations on ditto. 29. Monetarius. MED (Vfeda'lior. v ' I ImpreJJions of Medals. See Casting. MEDALLION, or Medalion, a medal of an ex¬ traordinary fize, fuppofed to be anciently ftruck by the emperors for their friends, and for foreign princes and ambaifadors. But, that the fmallnefs of their num¬ ber might not endanger the lofs of the devices they bore, the Romans generally took care to ftamp the fubjeft of them upon their ordinary coins. Medallions, iri refpeft -of the- other coins, wer.e the fame as modern medals in refpedf of modern money : they were exempted from all commerce, and had no 7 MED other value than what was fet upon them by the fancy of the owner. Medallions are fo fcarce, that there ^'' cannot be any fet made of them, even though the me¬ tals and fixes fliould be mixed promifeuoufty. MEDE (Jofeph), a very learned Englifli divine of the 17th century, was educated at Cambridge, and foon diftinguiflied himfelf to great advantage ; for by the time he had taken the degree of mailer of arts in 16' o, he had made an uncommon progrefs in all aca¬ demical ftudies. His firft appearance as a writer was- by an addrefs to Dr Andrews, then biihop of Ely, in a M K d [ 48 ] MED a Latin traft De Sanditate Relative/, whicli was higli- ly approved of by that prelate, who deiired him to be his domeftic chaplain. This Mr Mede very civilly re- fufed; vahring die liberty of his ftudies above any hopes of preferment, and efteeming that freedom which he enjoyed in his cell, fo he ufed to call it, as the ha¬ ven of all his willies And indeed thefe thoughts had pofleffed him betimes; for when he was a fchool-boy, he was fent to by his uncle, Mr Richard Mede, a mer¬ chant, who, being then without children, offered to adopt him for his fon if he would live with him: but he refufed the offer, preferring, as it fhould feem, a life of fiudy to a life of gain. He was not chofen fellow of his college till after he was mafter of arts, and then not without the affiitance of his friend bifhop Andrews: for he had been paffed over at feveral ele&ions, on account of a caufelefs fuf- picion which Dr Caiy, then mafter of the college, af terwards bifhop of Exeter, had conceived of him, that “ he looked too much towards Geneva.” Being made fellow, he became an eminent and faithful tutor. Af¬ ter he had well grounded his pupils in humanity, lo¬ gic, and philafophy, fo that they were able to walk ns it were alone, he ufed to fet every one his daily talk ; which he rather chofe, than to confine himfelf and them to precife hours for leisures. In the evening they all came to his chamber; and the firft queftion he put to each was, £>uid dubitai ? “ What doubts have you met with in your ftudies to-day 1” For he J'uppofed, that to doubt nothing and to underftand nothing was juft the fame thing. This was right, and the beft method to make young men exercife their ra¬ tional powers, and not acquiefce in what they learn mechanically, and by rote, with an indolence of fpirit which prepares them to receive and fwallow implicitly whatever is offered to them. As to himfelf,he was fo en¬ tirely devoted to the ftudy of all excellent knowledge, that he made even the time he fpent in his amufements ferviceable to his purpofe. He allowed himfelf little no exercife hut walking ; and often, in the fields or college garden, would take occafion to fpeak of the heauty, fignatures, virtues, or properties of the plants then in view. for he was a curious florift, an accurate herbalift, and thoroughly verfed in the book of na¬ ture. The chief delight he took in company was to difeourfe with learned friends. Mr Mede was a curious inquirer into the moft ab- ftrufe parts of learning, and endeavoured after the knowledge of thofe things which were moft remote from the vulgar track- Among other things, he fpent no fmall pains and time in founding the depths of a- ftrology, and blotted much paper in calculating the nativities of his near relations and fellow-ftudents: but this was in his younger years, and he afterwards dif- •covered the vanity and weaknefs of this fanciful art. He applied himfelf to the more ufeful ftudy of hiftory and antiquities; particularly to thofe myfterious fei- ences which made the ancient Chaldeans, Egyptians, and other nations, fo famous ; tracing them as far as he could have any light to guide him in their oriental fchemes and figurative expreffions, as likewife in their hieroglyphics, not forgetting to inquire alfo into the oneirocritics of the ancients : which he did the rather, becaufe of that affinity he conceived they might have N‘zo2. 7 with the language of the prophets. He was a curious Meleij and laborious fearcher of antiquities relating to reli- —v—* gion, ethnic, Jewifh, Chriftian, and Mahometan : to which he added other attendants, neceffary for under- ftanding the more difficult parts of Scripture. In 1620, he refufed the provoftftn'p of Trinity-col¬ lege, Dublin, into which he had been elefted at the recommendation of archbifliop Uffier, who was his par¬ ticular friend; as he did alfo when it was offered to him a fecond time, in 1630. The height of his am¬ bition was, only, to have had fome fmall donative fine- cure added to his fellowlhip, or to have been thrown into fome place of quiet; where, retired from the noife . | and tumults of the world, and poffeffed of a compe¬ tency of fortune, he might have been entirely at leifure for ftudy and afts of piety. In the mean time, al¬ though his circumftances were fcanty, for he had no¬ thing but his fellowlhip and a college ledhire, his cha¬ rity was diffufive and uncommon ; and, ftrange as it may now feem, he devoted the tenth of his income to pious and charitable ufes. But his frugality and tempe¬ rance always afforded him plenty. His prudence or moderation, either in declaring or defending his pri¬ vate opinions, was very remarkable; as was alfo his free¬ dom from partiality, prejudice or prepoffeffion, pride, anger, felfilhnefs, flattery, and ambition. He was meek, patient, equally remote from fuperftition and licentiouf- nefs of thinking ; and, in Ihort, poffeffed every virtue. This great and good man died in 1638, in his 52d year, having fpent above two-thirds of his time in college. MEDEA, in fabulous hiftory, a celebrated forcerefs, daughter of JEetes king of Colchis. Her mother’s name, according to the more received opinion of He- fiod and Hyginus, was Idyia, or, according to others, Ephyre, Hecate, Afterodia, Antiope, and Neaera. She was the niece of Circe. When Jafon came to Colchis in queft of the golden fleece, Medea became enamoured of him, and it was to her well-direfted labours that the Argonauts owed their prefervation. Medea had an interview with her lover in the temple of Hecate; where they bound themfelves by the moft folemn oaths to eternal fidelity. No fooner had Jafon overcome all the difficulties which iEetes had placed in his way, than Medea embarked with the conquerors for Greece. To flop the purfuit of her father, Ihe tore to pieces her brother A bfyrtus, and left his mangled limbs in the way through which iEetes was to pafs. This adt of barbarity, fome have attributed to Jafon, and not to her. When Jafon reached lolchos his na¬ tive country, the return and victories of the Argo¬ nauts were celebrated with univerfal rejoicings; but JEfon the father of Jafon was unable to affift at the folemnity on account of the infirmities of his age. Medea, at her hulband’s requeft, removed the weak¬ nefs of JEfon ; and by drawing away the blood from his veins, ^nd filling them again with the juice of cer¬ tain herbs, ihe reftored him to the vigour and fpright- linefs of youth. This fudden change in iEfon afto- niihed the inhabitants of lolchos ; and the daughter* of Pelias were alfo defirous to fee their father reftored by the fa,me power to the vigour of youth. Medea, willing to revenge the injuries which her huiband’s fa¬ mily had fuffered from Pelias, increafed their curi- oiity ; and betrayed them into the murder of their fa- ' thet MED ther as preparatory to his rejuvenefcence, which (he afterwards refufed to accompliih. This adtion great- j ly irritated the people of lokhos ; and Medea with her hu/band fled to Corinth to avoid their refentment. Here they lived^for 10 years with mutual attachment, when the love of Jafon for Glauce the king’s daugh¬ ter interrupted their harmony, and Medea was divor¬ ced. Medea revenged the infidelity of Jafon, by cau- [ 49 3 MED cording to Ptolemy, on the north by part of the Caf- pian Sea ; on the fouth by Perfis, Sufiana, and Afl’yria} on the eaft by Parfhia and Hyrcania; and on the weft by Armenia Major. It was anciently divided into fe- veral provinces, v'vz. Tropatene, Charomithrene, Da> rites, Marciane, Amariace, and Syro-Media. By a later divifion, however, all thefewere reduced to two; the one called Media Magna, the other Media Atrer- fing the death of Glauce, and the deltrudtion of her patia, or Amply Atropatene. Media Magna was bound family. She alfo killed two of her children in their father’s prefence ; and when Jafon attempted to punifh the barbarity of the mother, (he fled through the air upon a chariot drawn by winged dragons. From Co¬ rinth Medea came to Athens, where, after ihe had un¬ dergone the neceflary purification of her murder, fhe married king iEgeus, or (according to others) lived in an adulterous manner with him. From her condudf ■with vEgeus, Medea had a fon who was called Medus. Soon after, when Thefeus wilhed to make, himfelf known to his father, Medea, jealous of his fame and fearful of his power, attempted to poifon him at a feaft which had been prepared for his entertainment. Her attempts, however, failed of fuccefs, and the fight of the fword which Thefeus wore by his fide convin¬ ced iEgeus that the ftranger againft whofe life he had fo bafely confpired was his own fon. The father and the fon were reconciled ; and Medea, to avoid the puniihment which her wickednefs deferved, mount¬ ed her fiery chariot and difappeared through the air. She came to Colchis ; where, according to fome, ihe ed by Perfis, Parthia, Hyrcania, the Hyrcanian Sea and Atropatene, and contained the cities of Ecbatan Laodicea, Apamea, Raga, Rageia or Ragea, &c. Atropatene lay between the Cafpian mountains and the Cafpian Sea. This country originally took its name from Madai, the third fon of Japhet ; as is plain from Saripture, where the Medes are conftantly called Madai. Among profane authors, fome derive the name Media, from one Medus the fon of Jafon and Medea ; others from a city called Media. Sextus Rufus tells us that in his time it was called Medena, and from others we learn that it was alfo called Aria. The moft probable hi- ftory of the Medes is as follows. This people lived in fubje&ion to the Affyrians till the reign of Sennacherib, when they threw off the yoke, and lived for fome time in a ftate of anarchy. But at laft, rapine and violence, the natural confequences of fuch a fituation, prevailed fo much that they were con- ftrained to have recourfe to fome kind of government, that they might be enabled to live in fafety. Accord- was reconciled to Jafon, who had fought her in her na- ingly, about 699 B. C. one Dejoces having procured tive country after her fudden departure from Corinth. She died at Colchis, as Juftin mentions, when Ihe had been reftored to the confidence of her family. After death fhe married Achilles in the £lyfian fields, ac¬ cording to the traditions mentioned by Simonides. The murder of Mermerus and Pheres, the youngeft of Jafou’s children by Medea, is not to be attributed to the mother, according to Elian ; but to the Corin¬ thians, who affaflinated them in the temple of Juno Acrsea. To avoid the refentment of the gods, and to deliver themfelves from the peftilence which vifited himfelf to be chofen king, united the fcattered tribes into which the Medes were at that time divided; and having applied himfelf as much as poflible to the civi¬ lization of his barbarous fubjeCts, left the throne to his fon Phraortes, after a reign of 53 years. . The new king, who was of a warlike and enterpri- fing difpofition, fubdued almoft all the Upper Afia ly¬ ing between Mount Taurus and the river Halys which runs through Cappadocia into the Euxine Sea. Elated with this good fuccefs, he invaded Affyria, the empire of which was now much declined, and greatly weak- their country after fo horrid a maflacre, they engaged ened by the revolt of many nations which had follow- the poet Euripides for five talents to write a tragedy, which cleared them of the murder, and reprefented Medea as the cruel affaffin of her own children. And befides, that this opinion might be the better credit¬ ed the example of the Medes. Nebuchodonofor < Chyniladan, however, the reigning prince, having af- fembled what forces he could, engaged Phraorte", de¬ feated, took him prifoner, and put him to death ; af- ed, feftivals were appointed, in which the mother was ter which, entering Media, he laid wafte the country, reprefented with all the barbarity of a fury murdering took the metropolis of Ecbatan kfelf, and levelled it her own fons. MEDEOLA, climbing African asparagus, in botany : A genus of the hexandria order, belong¬ ing to the trigynia clafs of plants; and in the natural method ranking under the nth order, Sarmentacece. with the ground. On the death of Phraortes, his fon Cyaxares was pla¬ ced on the throne. He was no lefs valiant and enter- prifing than his father, and had better fuccefs againft the Aflyrians. With the remains of that army which There is no calyx; the corolla is fexpartite and revolu- had been defeated under his father, he not only drove ted ; the berry trrfpermous. Its charafters are thefe: The flower has no empalement; it has fix oblong oval petals, and fix awl-lhaped. ftamina terminated by in¬ cumbent fummits; and three horned germina termi¬ nating the ftyle ; the germina afterward turn to a roundifh trifid berry with three cells, each contain¬ ing one heart-ihaped feed. There are two fpe- cies. MEDIA, now the province of Ghilan in Perfia, once the feat of a potent empire, was bounded, ao V-ol. XI. Part L the conquerors out of Media, but obliged Chyniladan to fhut himfelf up in Nineveh. To this place he im¬ mediately laid dofe fiege; but was obliged to give over the enterprize on account of an irruption of the Scy¬ thians into his own country. Cyaxares engaged thefe new enemies with great refolution; but was utterly defeated; and the conquerors over-ran not only all Me¬ dia, but the greateft part of Upper Afia, extending their conquefts into Syria, and as far as the confines of Egypt. They continued mailers of all this vaft 0 tradl MED [ 50 ] MED Media traft of country for 28 years, till at laid Media was , II .. delivered from their yoke by a general maflacre at the inftigation of Cyaxares. » -i After this deliverance, the Medes foon repofleffed themfelves of the territories they had loft ; and once more extended their frontiers to the river Halys, their ancient boundary to the weftward. After this we find the Medes engaged in a war with the Lydians ; which, however, ended without any remarkable tranfaftion : but on the conclufion of it, Cyaxares having entered into a ftrict alliance with Nebuchadnezzar king of Ba¬ bylon, returned in conjunction with the Babylonians before Nineveh j which they took and levelled with the ground, putting moft of the inhabitants, to the fword. After this victory the Babylonian and Median em¬ pires feem to have been united : however, after, the death of Nebuchadnezzar, or rather in his lifetime, a war enfued, which was not extinguifhed but by the diffolution of the Babylonian empire. The Medes, un¬ der Aftyages the fon of Cyaxares I. withftood the power of the Babylonian monarchs; and under Cyrus and Cyaxares II. utterly deftroyed their empire by the taking of Babylon, as is related under that article. After the death of Cyaxares, the kingdom fell to Cy¬ rus, by whom the feat of the empire was transferred to Persia, under which article the hiftory of Media now falls to be confidered, as alfo the manners, &c. of the inhabitants. MEDIANA, the name of a vein or little veffel, made by the union of the cephalic and bafilic, in the bend of the elbow. MEDIASTINUM, in anatomy, a double mem¬ brane, formed by a duplicature of the pleura ; ferving to divide the thorax and the lungs into two parts, and Mediat to fuftain the vifeera, and prevent their falling from Mecj;'|ins one fide of the thorax to the other. See Anatomy, n° IM¬ MEDIATE, or Intermediate^ fomething that Hands betwixt and connects two or more terms confi- dcred as extremes; in which fenfe it ftands oppofed to immediate. MEDIATOR, a perfon that manages or tranfafts between two parties at variance in order to reconcile them. The word, in Scripture, is applied, 1.T0 Jefus Chrift, who is the only interceflbr and peace-maker between God and man, (1 Tim. ii. 5.) 2. To Mofea* who interpofed between the Lord and his people, to declare unto them his word; (Deut. v. 5. iii. 19.) MEDICAGO, Snail-trefoil, in botany: A genus of the decandria order, belonging to the diadel- phia clafs of plants ; and in the natural method rank¬ ing under the 3 2d order, Papilionacea. The legumen is compreffed and fere wed ; the carina of the corolla luring down from the vexillum. There are nine fpe- cies, though only five are commonly cultivated in this country. They are low trailing plants, adorned with fmall yellow flowers, fucceeded by fmall, round, fnaii- (haped fruit, which are downy, and armed with a few fhort fpines. They are all eafily propagated by feeds. For the properties and culture of Lucern, a fpecies of this genus, fee Agriculture, n° 183. MEDICINAL, any thing belonging to medi- Medicinal Springs, a general name for any foun¬ tain, the waters of which are of ufe for removing cer¬ tain diforders. They are commonly either chalybeate or fulphureous. See Springs and Water. M E D I MEDICINE is the art of preventing, curing, or alleviating, thofe difeafes to which the human fpecies are fubje&ed. History of Medicine. t J Oriein of T h e fabulous hiftory of the ancients derives this art medicine Jmmeci;ately from their gods; and, even among the Tews; moderns, tome are or opinion that it may juitly be confidered as of divine revelation. But without adopt¬ ing any fuppofition of which no probable evidence can be given, we may conclude that mankind were naturally led tQ it from cafual obfervations on the dif¬ eafes to which they found themfelves fubje&ed ; and that therefore, in one fenfe at leaft, it is as Ancient as the human race. But at what period it began to be practifed as an art, by particular individuals following it as a profeffion, is not known. The moft ancient phyficians we read of were thofe who embalmed the patriarch Jacob by order of his fon Jofeph. The facred writer ftyles thefe phyficians fer-vants to Jofeph : whence we may be allured that they were not priejls, as the firft phyficians are generally fuppofed to have been ; for in that age we know the Egyptian priefts were in fuch high favour, that they retained their li¬ CINE. berty, when, through a public calamity, all the reft of the people were made Haves to the prince. It is not probable, therefore, that among the E- gyptians religion and medicine were originally con¬ joined ; and if we fuppofe the Jews not to have in¬ vented the art, but received it from feme other nation, it is as little probable that the priefts of that nation were their phyficians as thofe of Egypt. That the Jewilh phyficians were abfolutely diftinct from their priefts, is very certain. Yet as the Jews re- fided for fuch a long time in Egypt, it is probable they would retain many of the Egyptian cuftoms, from which it would be very difficult to free them. We read, however, that when king Afa was difeafed in his feet, “ he fought not to the Lord, but to the phyficians.” Hence *we may conclude, that among1 the Jews the medicinal art was looked upon as a mere human invention ; and it was thought that the Deity never cured difeafes by making people acquainted with the virtues of this or that herb, but only by his miraculous power. That the fame opinion prevail¬ ed among the heathens who were neighbours to the Jews, is alfo probable from what we read of Ahaziah king of Judah, who having fent mefleogers to inquire 3 iHiftory. M E D I 9 'Origin of of Baal-zebub god of Ekron concerning his difeafe, * Medic ne. jje not defire any remedy from him or his priefts* ’i ’ but limply to know whether he fhould recover or not. What feems moll probable on this fubjeft therefore is, that religion and medicine came to be mixed toge* ther only in confequence of that degeneracy into ig¬ norance and fuperftition which took place among all nations. The Egyptians, we know, came at lall to be funk in the moft ridiculous and abfurd fuperlli- tion ; and then, indeed, it is not wonderful to find their priefts commencing phyficians, and mingling charms, incantations, &c. with their remedies. That this was the cafe, though long after the days of Jofeph, we are very certain ; and indeed it feems as natural for ignorance and barbarifm to combine, reli¬ gion with phyfic, as it is for a civilized and enlighten¬ ed people to keep them feparate. Hence we fee, that j)~ * among all modern barbarians their prielts or conjurors I, are their only phyficians. tnong the We are fo little acquainted with the Hate of phyfic gyptians; among the Egyptians, that it is needlefs to fay much 1 concerning them. They attributed the invention of medicine, as they did alfo that of many other arts, to Thoth, the Hermes or Mercury of the Greeks. He is faid to have written many things in hieroglyphic characters upon certain pillars, in order to perpetuate his knowledge, and render it ufeful to others. Thefe were tranfcribed by Agathodemon, or the fecond Mer¬ cury, the father of Tat, who is faid to have compofed books' of them, that were kept in the moll facred places of the Egyptian temples. T’he exiltence of fuch a perfon, however, is very dubious, and many of the books afcribed to him were accounted forgeries as long ago as the days of Galen ; there is alfo great rea- fon to fufpedt that thofe books were written many ages after Hermes, and when phyfic had/inade confi- derable advances. Many of the books attributed to him are trifling and ridiculous; and though fometimes he is allowed to have all the honour of inventing the art, he is on other occafions obliged to lhare it with Ofiris, Ills, and Apis or Serapis. After all, the Egyptian phyfic appears to have been little elfe than a cofie&ion of abfurd iiiperllitions. Ori- gen informs us, that they believed there were 3b de¬ mons, or gods of the air, who divided the human body among them ; that they had names for all of them; and that by invoking them according to (the part affecled, the patient was cured. Of natural medicines we hear of none recommended by the father of Egyptian phy¬ fic ; except the herb moty, which he gave to Ulyfles in order to fecure him from the enchantments of Circe } and the herb mercury, of which he firll difcovered the life. Hio fucceflbrs made ufe of venefe&ion, cathartics, emetics, and, clyllers. There is no proof, however, that this praftice was ellablilhed by Hermes ; on the con¬ trary, the Egyptians themfelves pretended that the firll hint ,of thofe rerpedies was taken from fome ob- fervations on brute animals. Venefedtion was taught them by the hippopotamus, which is faid to perform this operation upon itfelf. On thefe occafions, he comes out of the river, and ftrikes his leg againll a lharp-pointed reed. As he takes care to diredt the llroke againll a vein, the contequence mull be a con- fiderable effufion of blood'; and this being fuffered to run as long as the creature thinks proper, he at lall CINE. 51 flops up the orifice with mtfd. The bint of clyflers Origin of was taken from the ibis a bird which is faid to give ■'ie(iicine-, itfelf clyfters with its bill, &c. They ufed venefec- ' tion, however, but very little, probably on account of the warmth of the climate ; and the exhibition of the remedies above mentioned, joined with abllinence, formed the moft of their pradlice. 3 The Greeks too had feveral perfons to whom they Among tbs attributed the invention of phyfic, particularly Pro-0165*13, metheus, Apollo or Prean, and iEfculapius ; which lall was the moft celebrated of any. But here we mull obferve, that as the Greeks were a very w arlike people, their phyfic feems to have been little elfe than what is now called furgery, or the cure of wounds, frac¬ tures, &c. Hence VEfculapius, and his pupils Chi¬ ron, Machaon, and Podalirius, are celebrated by Ho¬ mer only for their Hull in curing thefe, without any mention of their attempting the cures of internal dif- eafes. We are not, however, to fuppofe that they confined themfelves entirely to furgery. They no doubt would occafionally preferibe for internal difor- ders ; but as they were moft frequently converfant with wounds, we may naturally fuppofe the greatell part of their fkill to have confifted in knowing how to cure thefe. If we may believe the poets, indeed, the know¬ ledge of medicine feems to have been very generally diffufed. Almoll all the heroes of antiquity are re¬ ported to have been phyficians as well as warriors. Moll of them were taught phyfic by the centaur Chi¬ ron. From him Hercules received inftrudlions in the medicinal art, in which he is faid to have been no lefs expert than in feats of arms. Several plants were called by his name 5 whence fome think it pro¬ bable that he found out their virtues, though others are of opinion that they bore the name of this re¬ nowned hero on account of their great efficacy in re¬ moving difeafes. Ariftasus king of Arcadia was alfo one of Chiron’s fcholars; and is fuppofed to have dif¬ covered the ufe of the drug called jilph'ium, by fome thought to be afafastida. Thefeus, Telamon, Jafon, Peleus, and his fon Achilles, were all renowned for their knowledge in the art of phyfic. The laft is faid to have difcovered the ufe of verdegrife in clean- fing foul ulcers. All of them, however, feem to have been inferior in knowledge to Palamedes, who hinder¬ ed the plague from coming into the Grecian camp af¬ ter it had ravaged moft of the cities of Hellefpont, and even Troy itfelf. His method was to confine his foldiers to a dpare diet, and to oblige them to ufe much exercife. The praflice of thefe ancient Greek phyficians, not- withftanding the praifes bellowed on them by their poets, feems to have been very limited, and in fome cafes even pernicious. All the external remedies applied to Homer’s wounded heroes were fomentations ; while inwardly their phyficians gave them wine, fometimes. mingled with cheefe feraped down. A great deal of their phyfic alfo confifted in charms, incantations, a- mulets, &c. of which, as they are common to all fu- perftitious and ignorant nations, it is fuperfluous to take any farther notice. In this way the art of medicine continued among the Greeks for many ages. As its firft profeffors knew nothing of the animal oeconomy, and as little of the theory of difeafes, it is plain, that whatever they did G 2 mult 52 M E D I 4 muft have been in confequence of mere random trials, yfcrcui..pni-.or ejnpincifm, in the moll ftridl and proper fenfeof the '' ' word. Indeed, it is evidently impoflible that this or almoft any other art could originate from another fource than trials of this kind. Accordingly, we find, that fome ancient nations were accuflomed to expofe their fick in temples, and by the fides of highways, that they might receive the advice of every one who paffed. Among the Greeks, however, iEfculapius was reckoned the moll eminent pradlitioner of his time, and his name continued to be*revered after his death. He was ranked amongft the gods; and the prin¬ cipal knowledge of the medicinal art remained with his family to the time of Hippocrates, who reckoned himfelf the feventeenth in a lineal defeent from JEfcu- lapius, and vrho was truly the firll who treated of me- § dicine in a regular and rational manner. JhppQ- Hippocrates, who is fuppofed to have lived 400 traces. years before the birth of Chrill, is the moll ancient author whofe writings exprefsly on the fubjeft of the medical art are preferred ; and he is therefore jullly confidered as the father of phyfic. All the accounts which we have prior to this time, if riot evidently fa¬ bulous, are at the utmoll highly conjedlural. Even the medical knowledge of Pythagoras, fo much cele¬ brated as a philofopher, can hardly be confidered as relling on any other foundation. But from the time of Hippocrates, medicine, feparated from phflofophy and religion, feems to have a (fumed the form of a fei- ence, and to have been pra£lifed as a profeffion. It may not, therefore, be improper to give a particular account of the Hate of medical knowledge as tranfmit- ted to us in his writings. The writings of Hippo¬ crates, however, it may be remarked, are even more than preferred. Nor is it wonderful that attempts ^ fhould have been made to increafe the value of manu- IT.S Wri- fcnPts> by attributing them to a name of fuch emi- tings. nence. But although what are tranfmitted to us un¬ der the title of his works may' have been written by different hands, yet the prefumption is, that moll, if not all of them, are of nearly as early a date, and con¬ tain the prevailing opinions of thofe times. According to the moll authentic accounts, Hippo¬ crates was a native of the iiland of Cos, and born in the beginning of the 88th Olympiad. In the writings tranfmitted to us as his, we find a general principle adopted, to which he gives the name of Nature. To ■this principle he aferibes a mighty power. “ Nature (fays he) is of itfelf fufficient to every animal. She performs every thing that is neceffary to them, with¬ out needing the leaft inllruftion from any one how to do it.’* Upon this footing, as if Nature had been a principle endowed with knowledge, he gives her the title of ju/?; and aferibes virtues or powers to her, which are het fervants, and by means of which fhe performs all her operations in the bodies of animals : and dillributes the blood, fpirits, and heat, through all parts of the body, which by thefe means receive life and fenfation. And in other places he tells us, that it is this faculty which gives nourilhment, prefervation, ? and growth, to all things. His idea The manner in which nature adls, or commands her •fnatuie. fubfervient power to aft, is by attra&ing what is good and agreeable to each fpecies, and by retaining, preparing, and changing it; and on the other fide in. CINE. Hiftory. rejefting whatever is fuperfluous or hurtful, after Ihe has Hippo- | feparated it from the good. This is the foundation of ciatg;l' J the dodlrine of depuration, concoflion^ and crilis in *" fevers, fo much infilled upon by Hippocrates and moll other phyficians. He fuppqfes alfo, that every thing has an inclination to be joined to what agrees with it, and to remove/from every thing contrary to it; and likewife that there is an affinity between the feveral parts of the body, by which they mutually fympa- thize with each other. When he comes to explain what this principle called nature is, he is obliged to refolve it into heat, which, he fays, appears to have fomething immortal in it. 8 I As far as he attempts to explain the caufes pf dif-°f tb6 cafe, he refers much to the humours of the body, par- ^ ll ticularly to the blood and the bile. He treats alfo of ’ ,j the effebls of lleep, watchings, exercife, and relt, and all the benefit or mifehief we may receive from them. Of all the caufes of difeafes, however, mentioned by Hippocrates, the moll general are diet and air. On 'the fubjefl of diet he has compofed feveral books, and in the choice of this he was exa&ly careful; and the more fo, as his praftice turned almoll wholly upon it. He alfo confidered the air very much ; he examined what w inds blew ordinarily or extraordinarily ; he con¬ fidered the irregularity of the feafons, the riling and fetting of liars, or the time of certain conllellations ; alfo the time of the folllices, and of the equinoxes ; thofe days, in his opinion, producing great alterations in certain dillempers. 9 He does not, however, pretend to explain how, His divi. 1 from thefe caufes, that variety of dillempers arifes ®®ns j which is daily to be obferved. All that can be ga- ‘ ^ i thered from him with regard to this is, that the diffe¬ rent caufes above-mentioned, when applied to the different parts of the body, produce a great va¬ riety of dillempers. Some of thefe dillempers he accounted mortal, others dangerous, and the retl eafily curable, according to the caufe from whence they fpring, and the parts on wffiich they fall. In feveral places alfo he dillinguiffies difeafes, from the time of their duration, into acute or Jhort, and chronical or long. He likewife dillinguilhes difeafes by the par¬ ticular places where" they prevail, whether ordi¬ nary or extraordinary. The firll, that is, thofe that are frequent and familiar to certain places,, he called endemic difeafes; and the latter, which ravaged extraordinarily fometimes in one place,, | fometimes in another, wdiich feized great numbers at certain times, he called epidemic, that is, popular difeafes; and of this kind the moll terrible is the plague. He likewife mentions a third kind, the oppofite of the former; and thefe he calls fporadic,. 6r llraggling difeafes: thefe lall include all the diffe¬ rent forts of diltempers which invade at any one feafon, which are fometimes of one fort, and fometimes of another. He dillinguilhed between thofe difeafes which are hereditary, or born with us, and thofe which are contracted afterwards; and likewife be¬ tween thofe of a kindly and fuch as are of a malignant nature, the former of which are eafily and frequently cured, hut the latter give the phyficians a great deal of trouble, and are feldom overcome by all their care. Hippocrates remarked four ftages in dillempers.;. viz*. Hiftory. MED] , Hippo- viz. the beginning of the difeafe, its augmentation, cratca' ft^te or height, and its declination. In fuch difeafes as terminate fatally, death comes in place of the declination. In the third ftage, therefore, the change is molt confiderable, as it determines the fate of the fick perron ; and this is moft commonly done by means of a cr'ifu. By this word he underftood any fudden change in ficknefs, whether for the better or for the worfe, whether health or death fucceed im¬ mediately. Such a change, he fays, is made at that time by nature either abfolving or condemning the patient. Hence we may conclude, that Hippocrates imagined difeafes to be only a difturbance of the ani¬ mal economy, with which Nature was perpetually at variance, and uling her utmoil endeavours to expel the I offending caufe. Her manner of adling on thefe occa- fions is to reduce to their natural ftate thofe humours whofe difcord occafions the diftuihance of the whole body, whether in relation to their quantity, quality, mixture, motion, or any other way in which they become offenfive. The principal means employed by I io nature for this end is what Hippocrates calls concoSion. HU opinion Jgy this he underftood the bringing the morbific ©f a crifls. matter lodged in the humours to fuch a ftate, as to be eafily fitted for expulfion by whatever means nature might think moft proper. When matters are brought to this pafs, whatever is fuperfluous or hurtful imme¬ diately empties itfelf, or nature points out to phy- ficians the way by which fuch an evacuation is to be accompliihed. The crifis takes place either by bleeding, ftool, vomit, fweat, urine, tumors or abf- cefles, fcabs, pimples, fpots, &c. But thefe evacutions are not to be looked upon as the effedls of a true crifis, unlefs they are in confiderable quantity •> fmall difchar- ges not being fufficient to make a crifis. Oh the contra¬ ry, fmall difcharges are a fign that nature isdeprefied by the load of humours, and that (he lets them go thro’ weaknefs and continual irritation. What comes fortb in this manner is crude, becaufe the diftemper is yet too ftrong; and while matters remain in this ftate,. nothing but a bad or imperfect crifis is to be expedted. This ihows that the diftemper triumphs, or at leaft is equal in ftrength to nature, which prognofticates death, or a prolongation of the difeafe. In this- laft cafe, however, nature often has an opportunity of attempting a new crifis more happy than the for¬ mer, after having made freih efforts to advance the concodtion of the humours. — It muft here be obfe’rved, however, that, according to Hippocrates, concodtion cannot be made but in a certain time, as every fruit has a limited time to ripen ; for he compares the humours which nature has digefted to fruits come to maturity. The time required for eoncodlion depends on the differences among diftempers mentioned above. In thofe which Hippocrates call -very acute, the digeftion or crifis happens by the fourth- day; in thofe which are only tfcate, it happens on the feventh, nth, or 14th day ; which laft is the longeft period generally allowed by Hippocrates in dillempers that are truly acute: though in fome places he ftretches it to the 20th, or 21 ft, nay, fometimas to the 40th or 6cth days. All difeafes that exceed this laft term ate called chronica!. And while in thofe difeafes that CINE. exceed 14 days, he confiders every fourth day as cn- Hq tical, or at leaft remarkable, by which we may judge whether the crifis on the following fourth day will be v favourable or not; fo in thofe which run from 20 to 40 he reckons only the fevenths, and in thofe that ex¬ ceed 40 he begins to reckon by 20. Beyond the 120th he thinks that the number of days has no power over the crifis. They are then referred to the general changes of the feafons ; fome terminating about the equinoxes ; others about the folftices ; others about the rifing or fetting of the ftars of certain conftella- tions; or if numbers have yet any place, he reckons by months, or even whole years Thus (he fays),, certain difeafes in children have their crifis in the feventh month after their birth, and others in their feventh or even their 14th year. Though Hippocrates mentions the 21ft as one of the critical days in acute diftempers, as already noticed; yet, in other places of his works, he mentions alfd the 20th. The reafon he gives for thh in one of thofe places of his works is, that the days of ficknefs were not quite entire. In general, however, he is much attached to the odd days: infomuch that in one of his aphorifms he tells uj, “ The fweats that come out upon the 3d, jth, 7th, 9th, nth, 14th, 17th, 2ift,. 27th, 31ft, or 3-4111 day. , are beneficial ; but tbofe that come out upon other days fignify that the fick ftiall be brought l@w, that his difeafe ftiall be very tedious, and that he ftiall be fubjeft to relapfes.” He further fays, “ That the fever which leaves the fick upon any but an odd day is ufually apt to relapfe.” Sometimes, however, he confeffes that it is otherwife ; and he gives an in- ftance of a falutary crifis happening on the fixth day. But thefe are very rare inftanees, and there¬ fore cannot, in his opinion, overthrow the geveral rule. Befides the crifis, however, or the change which determines the fate of the patient, Hippocrates often fpeaks of another, which only change; the fpecies of the diftemper, without reftoring the patient to health ; as when a vertigo is turned to an epilepfy, a tertian fever to a quartan, or to a continual, &c. Ir But what has chiefly contributed to procure the vaft refpeft generally paid to Hippocrates,, is his in- Uoftics • duftry in. obferving the moft minute circumftances of difeafes, and his exaftnefs in nicely deferibing every thing that happened before* and every accident that appeared at the fame time with them ; and likewife what appeared to give eafe, and what to increafe the malady : which is what we call rw> king the hijlory cf a difeafe.—Thus he not only diftinguifhed one difeafir ff om another by the figns which properly belonged to each ; but by comparing the fame fort of diftemper which happened to feveral perfons, and the accidents- which ufually appeared before and after, he could, often foretel a difeafe before it came, and afterwards give a right judgment of the event of it. By this way of prognofticating, he came to be exceedingly admired: and this he carried to fuch a height, that, it may juftly be faid to be his mafter-piece ;. and Cel- fus, who lived after him, remarks, that fucceeding phyficians, though they found out feveral new things- relating to the management of difeafes, yet were obli- 4. * ^ o 54 Hippo¬ crates. From the look; Trom the fofture in ed; MEDICINE. Hi doty* get! to the writings of Hippocrates for all that they of thofe that rah upoft fnoarnfal fubjecls, than fuch as Hippo- knew of figns. are accompanied with mirth. crates- t The firft thing Hippocrates confidered, when called When a patient breathes fall, and is oppreffed, it is Fromvr<._ to a patient, was his looks. — It was a good fign with a fign that he is in pain, and that the parts above the fpiration 5 him to have a vifage refembling that of a perfon in diaphragm are inflamed. Breathing long, or when health, and the fame with what the fick man had be- the patient is a great while in taking his breath, fore he was attacked by the difeafe. As it varied (hows him to be delirious; but eafy and natural re- from this, fo much the greater danger was appre- fpiration is always a good fign in acute difeafes. Hip- hended. The following is the defcription which he pocrates depended much on refpiration in making his gives of the looks of a dying man.—“ When a pa- prognoflics ; and therefore has taken care in feveral tient (fays he) has his note fliarp, his eyes funk, his places to defcribe the different manner of a patient’s temples hollow, his ears cold and contracted, the Ikin breathing. Continual watchings in acute difeafes, of his forehead tenfe and dry, and the colour of his are figns of prefent pain, or a delirium near at face tending to a pale-green, or lead colour, one may hand. . give out for certain that death is very near at hand ; Hippocrates alfo drew figns from all excrements, From ex- unlefs the ftrength of the patient has been exhaufted whatever they are, that are feparated from the body cremenciti- all at once by long watchings, or by a loofenefs, or of man. His mofi remarkable prognoflics, however, ou3 dlfcly* being a long time without eating.” This obfervatioft were from the urine. The patient’s urine, in his opi-^ei' has been confirmed by thofe of fucceeding phyficians, nion, is bell when the fediment is white, foft to the who have, from him, denominated it the Hippocratic touch, and of an equal confiftence. If it continue fo face. The lips hanging relaxed and *:old, are like- during the courfe of the diflemper, and till the time of wife looked upon by this author as a confirmation of the crifis, the patient is in no danger, and will foon be the foregoing prognoflic. He took alfo his figns well. This is what Hippocrates called concoQed urine, Urine, from the difpofition of the eyes in particular. When or what denotes the concoction of the humours ; and a patient cannot bear the light; when he fheds tears he obferved, that this concoftion of the urine feldom involuntarily; when, in fleeping, fome pare of the appeared thoroughly, but on the days of the crifis white of the eye is feen, unlefs he ufually fleeps after which happily put an end to the diftemper. “ We that manner, or has a loofenefs: upon him : thefe figns, Ought (faid Hippocrate ) to compare the urine with as well as the foregoing ones, prognoflicate danger, the purulent matter which runs from ulcers. As the The eyes deadened, as it were with a mill fpread over pus, which is white, and of the fame quality with the them, or their brightnefs loft, likewife prefages death, fediment of the urine we are now fpeaking of, is a or great weaknefs. The eyes fparkling, fierce, and fign that the. ulcer is on the point of clofing ; fo that fixed, denote the patient to be delirious, or that which is clear, and of another colour than white* he foon will be feized with a frenzy. When the and of an ill fmell, is a fign that the ulcer is virulent, patient fees any thing red, and like fparks of fire and in the fame manner difficult to be cured: the and lightning pafs before his eyes, you may ex- urines that are like this we have deferibed are only peft an haimorrhagy ; and this often happens before thofe which may be named good; all the reft are thofe crifes which are to be attended by a lofs of ill, and differ from one another only in the degrees of blood. more and lefs. The firft never appear but when na- The Condition of the patient is alfo ftiown by his ture has overcome the difeafe ; and are a fign of the 1 pofture in bed. If you find him lying on one fide, concoClion of humours, without which you cannot hope his body, neck, legs, and arms, a little contracted, for a certain cure. On the contrary, the laft are made which is the pofture of a man in health, it is a good as long as the crudity remains, and the humours con- fign : on the contrary, if he lies on his back, his arms tinue unconco&ed. Among the urines of this laft ftretched out, and his legs hanging down, it is a fign fort, the beft are reddifti, with a fediment that is foft, of great weaknefs; and particularly when the patient and of an equal confiftence ; which denotes, that the Aides or lets himfelf fall down towards the feet, it de- difeafe will be fomewhat tedious, but without danger, notes the approach of death. When a patient in a The ivorft are thofe which are very red; and at the burning fever is continually feeling about with his fame time clear and without fediment; or that are hands and fingers, and moves them up before his face muddy and troubled in the making. In urine there is and eyes as it he was going to take away fomething often a fort of cloud hanging in the veffel in which it that paffed before them ; or on his bed-covering, as if is received ; the higher this rifes, or the farther diftant he was picking or fearching for little ftraws, or taking it is from the bottom, or the more different from the away fome filth, or drawing out little flocks of wool; colour of the laudable fediment abovementioned, the all this is a fign that he is delirious, and that he will more there is of crudity. That which is yellow, or of die. Amongft the other figns of a prefent or ap- a fandy colour, denotes abundance of bile; that which proaching delirium, he alfo adds this: When a patient is black is the worft, efpecially if it has an ill fmell, who naturally fpeaks little begins to talk more than and is either altogether muddy or altogether clear, he ufed to do, or when one that talks much becomes That whofe fediment is like large ground wheat, or filent, this change is to be reckoned a fort of delirium, little flakes or feales fpread one upon another, or bran, or is a fign that the patient will foon fall into one. prefages ill, efpecially the laft. The fat or oil that The freqi ”• -... - ..... . .. . the wrift, rent forts itnt tremoung or itamng 01 the tendons or iometimes Iwims upon the top or the urine, and ap- prefage likewife a delirium. As to the diffe- pears in a form fomething like a fpider’s web, is a fign of delirium, Hippocrates is much more afraid of a confumption of the flefir and folid parts. The ma» , Hi (lory. M E D I i Hippo- king of a great quantity of urine is the fign of a cri- tl'att:8- and fometimes the quality of it fhows how the blad- * " *' ' der is affefted. We muft alfo obferve, that Hippo¬ crates compared the ftate of the tongue with the urine; that is to fay, when the tongue was yellow, and char¬ ged with bile, the urine he knew mull of courfe be of the fame colour ; and when the tongue was red and moift, the urine was of its natural colour. His prognoftics from the excretions by ftool are as follow. Thofe that are foft, yellowilh, of fome con- fiftence, and not of an extraordinary ill fmell, that an- fwer to the quantity of what is taken inwardly, and that are voided at the ufital hours, are the bell of all. They ought alfo to be of a thicker confiftence when the diftemper is near the crifis; and it ought to be ta¬ ken for a good prognoftic, when fome worms, round and long, are evacuated at the fame time with them. The prognofis, however, may ftill be favourable, though the matter excreted be thin and liquid, provided it make not too much noife in coming out, and the eva¬ cuation be not in a fmall quantity nor too often ; nor in fo great abundance, nor fo often, as to make the pa¬ tient faint. All matter that is watery, white, of a pale green, or red, or frothy and vifcous, is bad. That which is blackilh, or of a livid hue, is the moll pernicious. That which is pure black, and no¬ thing elfe but a difcharge of black bile, always prognolticates very ill; this humour, from what part foever it comes, (howing the ill difpofition of the inteftines. The matter that is of feveral different co¬ lours, denotes the length of the diftemper; and, at the fame time, that it may be of dangerous confequence. Hippocrates places in the fame clafs the matter that is bilious or yellow, and mixed with blood, or gr-een and black, or like the dregs or fcrapings of the guts. The ftools that confift of pure bile, or entirely of phlegm, he alfo looks upon to be very bad. Matter caft up by vomiting ought to be mixed with, bile and phlegm; where one of thefe humours only is obferved, it is worfe. That which is black, livid, green, or of the colour of a leek, indicates alarming confequences. The fame is to be faid of that which -fmells very ill; and if at the fame time ft be livid, death is not far off. The vomiting of blood is very often mortal. ^Expe&ora- The fpittings which give eafe in difeafes of the lungs and in pleurifies, are thofe that come up readily and, without difficulty ; and it is good if they be mix¬ ed at the beginning with much yellow: but if they appear of the fame colour, or are red, a great while after the beginning of the diftemper, are fait and acrimonious, and caufe violent coughings, they are not good. Spittings purely yellow are bad ; and thofe that are white, vifcous, and frothy, give no eafe. " Whitenefs is a good ftgn of concoftion in regard to fpittings; but they ought not at all to be vif¬ cous, nor too thick, nor too clear. We may make the fame judgment of the excrements of the nofe ac¬ cording to their concoftion and crudity. Spittings that are black, green, and red, are of very bad confe¬ quence. In inflammations of the lungs, thofe that are mixed with bile and blood prefage well if they ap¬ pear at the beginning, but are bad if they arife not about the feventh day. But the worft fign in thefe diftempers is, when there is no expe&oration at all, CINE. 55 and the too great quantity of matter that is ready to Hippo- be difcharged this way makes a rattling in the fcreaft. crates~ . After fpitting of blood, the difcharge of purulent mat- v ter often follows, which brings oh a confumption, and at laft death. A kind good fweat is that which arifes on the day Sweat, of the crifis, and is difcharged in abundance all over the body, and at the fame time from all parts of the body, and thus carries off the fever : A cold fweat is alarming, efpecially in acute fevers, for in others it is only a fign of long continuance. When the patient fweats no where but on the head and neck, it is a 'fign that the difeafe will be long and dangerous. A gentle fweat in fome particular part, of the head and breaft, for. inftance, gives no relief, but de¬ notes the feat of the diftemper, or the weaknefs of the part. This kind of iweat was called by Hippo¬ crates ephidrofis. The hypochondria, or the abdomen in general, From th$* ought always to be foft and even, as well on the rightPul^c' fide as on the left. When there is any hardnefs or un- evennefs in thofe parts, or heat and fwellings, or when the patient cannot endure to have it touched, it is a fign the inteftines are indifpofed. Hippocrates alfo inquired into the ftate of the pulfe, or the beating of the arteries. The moft ancient phy- ficians, however, and even Hippocrates himfelf, for a long time, by this word underftood the violent pulfa- tion that is felt in an inflamed part, without putting the fingers to it. It is obferved by Galen, and other phyficians, that Hippocrates touches on the fubjeft of the pulfe more llightly than any other on which he treats. But that our celebrated phyfician underftood fomething even on this fubjeft, is eafily gathered from feveral paffages in his writings; as when he obferves, that in acute fevers the pulfe is very quick and very great; and when he makes mention, in the fame place, of trembling pulfes, and thofe that beat flowly ; when he obferves, that in fome difeafes incident to women, when the pulfe ftrikes the finger faintly, and in a lan- guifhing manner, it is a fign of approaching death. He remarks alfo, in the Coaca Pranotiones, that he whofe vein, that is to fay, whofe artery of the elbow, beats, is juft going to run mad, or elfe that the perfon is at that time very much under the influ¬ ence of anger. From this account of Hippocrates, it will appear, that he was not near fo much taken up with reafoning on the phenomena of difeafes, as with reporting them. He was content to obferve thefe phenomena accurate¬ ly, to diftinguifh difeafes by them, and judged of the event by comparing them exa&ly together. For his Ikill in prognoftics he was indeed very remarkable, as we have already mentioned, infomuch that he and his pupils were looked upon by the vulgar as prophets. What adds very much to his reputation is, that he li¬ ved in an age when phyfic was altogether buried in fu- perftition, and yet he did not fuffer himfelf to be carried away by it; on the contrary, on many occafions, he ex- preffes his abhorrence of it. Having thus feen in what Hippocrates makes the difference between health and ficknefs to confift, and likewife the moft remarkable figns from whence he drew his prognoftics, we muft now confider the means he preferibed for the prefervation of health, and the cure 5$ . M E D I ■«- cure of difeafcs. ©nc of his principal maxims was . Cf3.rs- this, That, to preferve health, we ought not to over¬ charge ourfelves with too much eating, nor negledl Misma-cm!, the ufe of exercife and labour. In the next place, That f>- he pre- we ought by no means to accullom ourfelves to too fervation nice and exaft a method of living ; becaufe thofe who ct health. yave orjce begun to aft by this rule, if they vary in the leafl. from it, find themfelves very ill; which does not happen to thofe who take a little more liberty, and live fomewhat more irregularly. Notwithftanding this, he does not negleft to inquire diligently into what thofe who were in health ufed for food in his time. Diet. Here we cannot help taking notice of the prodigious difparity between the delicacy of the people in our days and in thofe of Hippocrates : for he takes great pains to tell the difference between the fifth of a dog, a fox, a horfe, and an afs $ which he would not have done if at that time they had not been ufed for vic¬ tuals, at leaft by the common people. Befides thefe, however, Hippocrates {peaks of all other kinds of pro- vifion that are now in ufe ; for example, falads, milk, whey, cheefe, flefh as well of birds as of four- footed beafts, frfth and fait fifh, eggs, all kinds of pulfe, and the different kinds of grain we feed on, as well as the different forts of bread that are made of it. He alfo fpeaks very often of a fort of liquid food, or broth, made of barley-meal, or feme other grain, which they fteeped for fome time, and then boiled in water. With regard to drink, he takes a great deal •of pains to diltinguifh the good waters from the bad. The bed, in his opinion, ought to be clear, fight, without fmell or talle, and taken out of the fountains that turn towards the eaft. The falt-waters, thofe that he calls hard, and thofe that rife out of fenny ground, are the worft of all; he condemns alfo thofe that come from melted fnow. But though Hippo¬ crates makes all thofe diftiffftions, he advifes thofe .' ho are in health to drink of the firft water that comes in their way. He fpeaks alfo of alum waters, and thofe that are hot; but does not enlarge upon their quali¬ ties. He advifes to mix wine with an equal quan¬ tity of water: and this (he fays) is the juft pro¬ portion ; by ufing which the wine will expel what is hurtful to the body, and the water will ferve to temper the acrimony of the humours. Exercife. For thofe that are in health, and likewife for fuch as are fick, Hippocrates advifes exercife. The books, however, which treat on this fubjeft, M. Le Clerc conjeftures to have been written by Herodicus, who firft introduced gymnaftic exercife into medicine, and who is faid by Hippocrates himfelf to have killed feve- ral people by forcing them to walk while they were af- flifted with fevers and other inflammatory diforders. The advices given, in them eonfift moftly in direftions for the times in which we ought to walk, and the con¬ dition we ought to be in before it; when we ought to walk flowly, and when to run, &c.; and all this with refpeft-to different ages and temperaments, and with defign to bring the body down, or diffipate the hu¬ mours. Wreftling, although a violent exercife, is numbered with the reft. In the fame place alfo mention is made of a play of the hands and fingers, which was thought good for health, and called chl- ronomie ; and of an®ther diverfion which was perform¬ ed round a fort of ball hung up, which they called N0 202. CINE. Hiftory* corycus, and which they flruck forward with both Hippo-; their hands. cr»es. I ■ With regard to thofe things which ought to be ] feparated from, or retained in the human body, *C 6 l0j Hippocrates obferves, that people ought to take great care- not to load themfelves with excrements, or keep them in too long ; and befides the exercife above-mentioned, which carries off one part of them, and which he preferibed chiefly on this account, he advifes people to excite and roufe up nature when file flagged, and did not endeavour to expel the reft, or take care of the impediments by which fhe was refifted. For this reafon he preferibed meats proper for loofening the belly; and when thefe were not fufficient, he direfted the ufe of clyfters and fuppofitories. For thin and emaciated perfons he di¬ refted clyfters compofed only of milk and oily unftu- ous fubftances, which they mixed with a decoftion of chick-peafe ; but for fuch as were plethoric, they only- made ufe of fait or fea-water. As a prefervative againft diftempers, Hippocrates alfo advifed the ufe of vdmits, which he direfted to be taken once or twice a month during the time of winter and fpring. The moft fimple of thefe were made of a decoftion of hyffop, with an addition of a little vine¬ gar and fait. He made thofe that were of a ftrong and vigorous conftbution take this liquor in a morning fall, ing ; hue fuch as were thin and weakly took it after fupper.—Venery, in his opinion, is wholefome, pro¬ vided people confult their ftrength, and do not pur- fue it to excefs ; which he finds fault with on all occa- fions, and would have excefs avoided alfo in relation to fleep and watching. In his writings are likewife to be found feveral remarks concerning good and bad air j and he makes it appear that the good or bad difpofi- tion of this element does not depend folely on the dif¬ ference of the climate, but on the fituation of every place in particular. He fpeaks alfo of the good and bad effefts of the paflions, and recommends moderation in regard to them. From what we have already related concerning the opinions of Hippocrates, it may naturally be. con¬ cluded, that for the moft part he would be contented with obferving w hat the ftrength of nature is able to accompfifh without being aflifted by the phyfician. That this -was really the cafe, may be eafily perceived from a perufal of his books entitled, “ Of epidemical diftempers which are, as it were, journals of the praftice of Hippocrates: for there we find him often doing nothing more than defdribing the fymptoms of a diftemper, and informing us what has happened to the patient day after day, even to his death or recovery, without fpeaking word of any kind of remedy. Sometimes, however, he did indeed make ufe of rt- | medics ; but thefe were exceedingly fimple and few, in comparifon of what have been given by fucceed- 1 ing praftitioners. Thefe remedies we fhall prefently confider, after we have given an abridgement of .J; the principal maxims on which his praftice is founded. 13 _ J Hippocrates afferted in the firft place, That contra- Hismaiia*» ries, or oppofites, are the remedies for each other; ^ and this maxim he explains by an aphorifm ; in w-hich eafCi he fays, that’evacuations cure thofe diftempers which come from repletion, and repletion thofe that are caa- fed Hrftory. M E D I Hippo - fed by evacuation. So heat Is deftroyed by cold, and t cr:‘te;‘ cold by heat, &c. In the fecond place, he afferted, * ' that phylic Is an addition of what is wanting, and a ■fubtra&Ion or retrenchment of what is fuperfluous: an axiom which is explained by this, viz. that there are fome juices or humours, which in particular cafes ought to be evacuated, or driven out of the body, or dried up ; and fome others which ought to be reftored to the body, or caufed to be produced there again. As to the method to be tahen for this addition or retrench¬ ment, he gives this general caution. That you ought vto be careful how you fill up, or evacuate, all at once, or too quickly, or-too much; and that it is equally dan¬ gerous to heat or cool again on a hidden ; or rather, you cught not to do it: every thing that runs to an «xcefs being an enemy to nature. In the fourth place, Hippocrates allowed that we ought fometimes to di¬ late, and fometitnes to lock up: to dilate, or open the palfages by which the humours are voided naturally, when they are not fufSciently opened, or when they are clofed ; and, rm the contrary, to lock up orllraiten the paffages that are rdaxed,when the juices that pafs there ought not to pafs, or when they pafs in too great quantity. He adds, that we ought fometimes to fmooth, and fometimes to make roughs fometimes to harden, and fometimes to foften again; fometimes to make more fine or fupple; fometimes to thicken ; fometimes to roufe up, and at other times to ftupify or take away the fenfe; all in relation to the folid ■parts of the body, or-to the humours. He gives alfo this farther leffon, That we ought to have regard to the courfe the humours take, from whence they come, and whither they go ; and in confequence of thar, when they go where they ought not, that we make them -take a turn about, or carry them another way, almofl l^ce the turning the courfe of a river: or, upon other J , occafions, that we endeavour if pofiible to recal, or make the fame humour^ return back again ; drawing upward fuch as have a tendency downward, and draw¬ ing downward fuch as tend upward. We ought alfo to carry off, by convenient ways, that which is necef- ■fary to be carried off ; and not let the humours once evacuated enter into the veffels again. Hippocrates gives alfo the following inftru&ion, That when we do any thing according to reafon, though the fuccefs be not anfwerable, we ought not too eafily, or too haftily, to alter the manner of atffing, as long as the reafons for it are yet good. But as this maxim might fometimes prove deceitful, he gives the following as a corrector to it-: “ We ought (fay^s he) to mind with a great deal of attention what gives eafe, and what creates pain ; what is eafily fupported, and what cannot be endured.” We ought not to do any thing rafiily; but ought often to paufe, or wait, without doing any thing: by this way, if you do the patient no good, you will at leaft do him no hurt. Thefe are the principal and moil general maxims of the pra&ice of Hippocrates, and which proceed up¬ on the fuppoiition laid down at the beginning, viz. that nature cures difeafes. We next proceed to con- fider particularly the remedies employed by him, which will ferve to give us further inftru&ions concerning his pra&ice. ! His max- ^iet was the firft, the principal, and often the only it ims refpe(3-rerne^)r mSc^e °f by this great phyfician to anfwer ing diet) Vot. XL Part I. CINE. the greateft part of the intentions above mentioned : by means of it he oppofed moift to dry, hot to cold, cr: Src.; and what he looked upon to be the moft con- fiderable point was, that thus he fupported nature, and affifted her to overcome the malady. The diete¬ tic part of medicine was fo much the invention of Hippocrates himfelf, that he was very defirous to be accounted the author of it; and the better to make it appear that it was a new remedy in his days, he fays, exprefsly, that the ancients had wrote almoff nothing concerning the diet of the fick, having omitted this, point, though it was one of the moft effential parts of the art. The diet preferibed by Hippocrates for patients la-j-,^1 bouring under acute diftempers, differed from tliat!lcute which he ordered for thofe afflifted with chronicaleafes. ones. In the former, which require a more particular exactnefs in relation to diet, he preferred liquid food to that which was folid, efpecrally in fevers. For thefe he ufed a fort of broth made of cleanfed barley ; and to this he gave the name of ptifaiu The manner in which the ancients prepared a ptifan was as follows They firft fteeped the barley iu water till it was plump¬ ed up ; and afterwards they dried it in the fun, and beat it to take off the hulk. They next ground it j. and having let the flour boil a long time in the wa¬ ter, they put it out into the fun, and when it was dry they preffed it clofe. It is properly this flour fo pre¬ pared that is called ptifan. They did almoft the fame thing with wheat, rice,, lentils, and other grain : but they gave thefe ptifans the name of the grain from, whence they were extracted, as ptfan of lentils, rice, Ike* whereas the ptifan of barley was called Amply ptifany on account of the excellency of it. When they wanted to ufe it, they boiled one part of it in xo or 15 of wa-> ter; and when it began to grow plump in boiling,, they added a little vinegar, and a very fmall quantity of anife or leek, ta keep it from clogging or filling the ftomach with wind. Hippocrates preferibes this broth for women that have pains in their belly after- delivery. “ Boil fome of this ptifan ffays he), with fome leek, and the fat of a goat, and give it to the woman in bed.” This will not be thought very Angular, if we refleA on w-hat has been hinted above concerning the indelicate manner of living in thofe times. He preferred the ptifan to all other food in fevers, becaufe it foftened and moiftened much, and was befides of eafy digeftion. If he was concerned in a continual fever, he would have the patient begin with a ptifan of a pretty thick coniiftence, and go on by little and little, leffening the quantity of barley- flour as the height of the diftemper approached ; fa that he did not feed the patient but with what he called the juice of the ptifan; that is, the ptifan ftrained, where there was but very little of the flour remaining, in order that nature being difeharged in part from the care of digefting the aliments, fhe might the more eafily hold out to the end, and overcome the diftem¬ per, or the caufe of it. With regard to the quantity, he caufed the ptifan to be taken twice a-day by fuch patients as in health ufed to take two meals a-day, not thinking it convenient that thofe who were Tick fhould eat oftener than when they were well. He alfo would, not allow eating twice a-day to thofe who eat but once in that time when in health. In the paroxyfm of a H fever , j8 ' M E D I H:pro- fever he gave nothing at all; and in all diftempers t crates» where there are exacerbations, he forbid nourithment v while the exacerbations continued. He let children eat more; but thofe who were grown up to man’s eftate, or were of an advanced age, lefs; making al¬ lowance, however, for the cuftom of each particular perfon, or for that of the country. But though he was of opinion that too much food ought not to be allowed to the fick, he was not of the mind of fome phyficians who prefcribed long abfti- nence, efpecially in the beginning of fevers. The rea- fon he gave for this was, that the contrary pra&ice weakened the patients too much during the firft days of the diftemper, by which means their phyficians were obliged to allow them more food when the illnefs was at its height, which in his opinion was improper. Be- fides, in acute diftempers, and particularly in fevers, Hippocrates made choice of refrelhing and moiftening nouriihment; and amongft other things prefcribed orange, melon, fpinach, gourd, and dock. This fort of food he gave to thofe that were in a condition to eat,-or could take fomething more than a ptifan. Drink ^ie he commonly gave to his patients was made of eight parts of water and one of honey. In fome diftempers they added a little vinegar; but be- fides thefe, they had another fort named *-vr.iv,, 0r mix¬ ture. One prefcription of this fort we find intended for a confumptive perfon ; it confifted of rue, anife, celery, coriander, juice of pomegranate, the rougheft red wine, water, flour of wheat and barley, with old cheefe made of goats milk. Hippocrates did not ap¬ prove of giving plain water to the fick ; but though he generally prefcribed the drinks above mentioned, he did not abfolutely forbid the ufe of wine, even in acute diftempers and fevers, provided the patients were rot delirious nor had pains in their head. Befides, he took care to diftinguifti the wines proper in thefe cafes: preferring to all other forts white-wine that is clear and has a great deal of water, with neither fweet- nefs nor flavour. 16 Thefe are the moft remarkable particulars concern- Dletischro Jng the diet prefcribed by Hippocrates in acute di¬ nk dikafcs. ftempers. ;,•> chronical ones he made very much ufe of milk and whey; though we are not certain whe¬ ther this was done on account of the nourifliment expe&ed from them, or that he accounted them me¬ dicines. There were many difeafes for which he judged the His maxims bath was a proper remedy ; and he takes notice of all the circumftances that are necefiary in order to ' caufe the patient receive benefit from it, among which the following are the principal. The patient that bathes himfelf muft remain ftill and quiet in his place without fpeaking while the affiftants throw water oven his head or are wiping him dry t for which laft pur- pofe he defired them to keep fponges, inftead of that inftrument called by the ancients Jlrigil, which ferved to rub off from the fkin the dirt and naftinefs left upon it by the unguents and oils with which they anointed themfelves. He mull alfo take care not to catch cold; and muft not bathe immediately after eating and drinking, nor eat or drink immediately after coming cut of the bath. Regard muft alfo be had whether the patient has been accuRomed to bathe while in C I N E. Hiftory.. health, and whether he has been benefited or hurt by it Laftly, he muft; abftain from the bath when the —-- , body is too open, or too coftive, or when he is toa ~ v'"**"; weak; or if he has an inclination to vomit, a great lofs of appetite, or bleeds at the nofe. The advantage of the bath, according to Hippocrates, confifts in moi¬ ftening and refrefhing, taking away wearinefs, making the fkin foft and the joints pliant; in provoking urine, making the noftrils open, and opening the other ex- cretories. He allows two baths in a day to thofe who have been accuftomed to it in health. ,3 In chronical diftempers Hippocrates approved very Hk maxim#! much of exercife, though he did not allow it in acute refpodting ones: but even in thefe he did not think that a pa-exere‘fe. tient ought always to lie a-bed; but tells us, that “we muft fometimes pufh the timorous out of bed, and roufe up the lazy.” When he found that diet and exercife were not 19 ; fiifficient to eafe nature of a burden of corrupted hu- His maxims- mours, he was obliged to make ufe of other means, 0f r' fi,ea‘nS which purgation was one. By this word he underftood tlur£aaun• all the contrivances that are made ufe of to difeharge the ftomach and bowels ; though it commonly fignifies only the evacuation by the belly by ftool. This eva¬ cuation he imagined to be occafioned by the purgative medicines attracting the humours to themfelves. When, firft taken into the body, he thought they attradied that humour which was moft fimilar to them, and then- the others, one after another.—Moft of the purgatives ufed in his time were emetics alfo, or at leaft were very violent in their operation downwards. Thefe were the white and black hellebore; the firft of which is now reckoned among the poifons. He ufed alfo the Cnidian berries, which are nothing elfe but the feeds of thymelea or chamaelea ; cneorum peplium, which is a fort of milk-thiftle ; thapfia ; the juice of hippo- phae, a fort of rhamnus ; elaterium, or juice of the wild cucumber; flowers of brafs, coloquintida, fcam- mony the magnefian ftone, &c. As thefe purgatives were all very ftrong, Hippo¬ crates was extremely cautious in their exhibition. He did not preferibe them in the dog-daysnor did he ever purge women with child, and very feldom chil¬ dren or old people. He principally ufed purgatives in- chronical diftempers ; but was much more wary in acute ones. In his books intitled “ Of Epidemical Hiftempers,” there are very few patients mentioned lo¬ wborn he gave purgative medicines. He alfo takes notice exprefsly, that thefe medicines having been given in cafes of the diftempers of which he was treating,, had produced very bad effefts. We are not, however, from this to conclude, that Hippocrates abfolutely con¬ demned purging in acute diftempers; for in fome places he exprefsly mentions his having given them with fuc- cefs. He was of opinion, for inftance, that purging was good in a pleurify when, the pain was feated be¬ low the diaphragm.; and in this cafe he gave black hellebore, or fome peplium mixed with the juice of la- ferpitium, which is fuppofed to have been our afafstida. The principal rule Hippocrates gives with relation, to purging is, that we ought only to purge off the humours that are conco&ed, and not thofe that are yet crude, taking particular care not to do it at the beginning of the diftemper, left the humours fhould Hiftory. M E D I Hippo- be dlfturbed or ftirred upi which happens pretty often. crates. j^e was not> however, the firft: who remarked tlpt ^ it would be of ill confequence to ftir the humours in the beginning of an acute diftemper. The Egyptian phyficians had before obferved the fame thing. By the beginning of a diftemper, Hippocrates underftood all the time from the firft day to the fourth complete. Hippocrates imagined that each purgative medicine waS adapted to the carrying off fome particular hu¬ mour; and hence the diftinftion of purgatives intohy- dragogue, cholagogue, &c. which is now juftly explo¬ ded. In confequence of this notion, which prevailed long after his time, he pretended that we knew if a pur¬ gative had drawn from the body what was fit to be eva¬ cuated according as we found ourfelves well or ill upon it. If we found ourfelves well, it was a fign that the medicine had effe&ually expelled the offending humour. On the contrary, if we were ill, he imagined, whatever quantity of humour came away, that the humour which caufed the illnefs ftill remained ; not judging of the goodnefs or badnefs of a purge by the quantity of matters that were voided by it, but by their quality and the effeft that followed after it. Vomits were alfo pretty much ufed as medicines by Hippocrates. We have already feen what thofe were which he prefcribed to people in health by way of preventives. With regard to the fick, he fometimes advifed them to the fame, when his intentions were only to cleanfe the ftomach. But when he had a mind to recal the humours', as he termed it, from the inmoft receffes of the body, he made ufe of brifker remedies. Among thefe was white hellebore ; and this indeed he moft frequently ufed to excite vomiting. He gave this root particularly to melancholy and mad people ; and from the great ufe made of it in thefe cafes by Hippocrates and other ancient phyficians, the phrafe to have need of hellebore, became a proverbial expreffion for being out of one’s fenfes. He gave it alfo in de¬ fluxions, which come, according to him, from the brain, and throw themfelves on the noftrils or ears, or fill the mouth with faliva, or that caufe ftubborn pains in the head, and a wearinefs or an extraordinary hea- vinefs, or a weaknefs of the knees, or a fwelling all over the body. He gave it to confumptive perfons in broth of lentils, to fuch as were afflidted with the dropfy < ailed leucophlegmatia, and in other chronical diforders. But we do not find that he made ufe of it in acute di- ftempers, except in the cholera morbus, where he fays he preft ribed it with benefit. Some took this medi¬ cine falling; but moft took it after fupper, as was com¬ monly pra&ifed with regard to vomits taken by way of prevention. Thereafon why he gave this medicine moft commonly after eating was, that by mixing with the aliments, its acrimony might be fomewhat abated, and it might operate with lefs violence on the mem¬ branes of the ftomach. With the.fame intention alfo he fometimes gave a plant called Jefamoides^ and fome¬ times mixed it with hellebore. Laftly, in certain cafes he gave what he called foft or fweet hellebore. This term had fome relation to the quality of the hel¬ lebore, or perhaps to the quantity he gave of it. When Hippocrates intended only to keep the body open, or evacuate the contents of the inteftines, he made ufe of fimples ; as for example, the herb mer¬ cury, or cabbage ; the juice or decodiion of which he CINE. 59 ordered to be drank. For the fame purpofe he ufed Hippo- whey, and alfo cows and afles milk; adding a little fait, cratt8, , to it, and fometimes letting it boil a little. If he gave “"-v affes milk alone, he caufed a great quantity of it to be taken, fo that it muft of neceffity loofen the body. In one place he prefcribes no lefs than nine pounds of it to be taken as a laxative, but does not fpecify the time in which it was to be taken. With the fame in¬ tention he made ufe of fuppofitories and clyfters. The former were compounded of honey, the juice of the herb mercury, of nitre, powderof colocynth, and other fliarp ingredients, to irritate the anus. Thefe they formed into a ball, or into a long cylindrical mafs like a finger. The clyfters he made ufe of for fick people were fometimes the fame with thofe already mention¬ ed as preventives for.people in health. At other times he mixed the deco&ion of herbs with nitre, honey, and oil, or other ingredients, according as he imagined he could by that means attradl, waih, irritate, or foften. The quantity of liquor he ordered was about 36ounces; from which it is probable he did not intend that it fhould all be ufed at one time. On fome occafions Hippocrates propofed to purge the head alone. This pradtice he employed, after pur¬ ging the reft of the body, in an apoplexy, inveterate pains of the head, a certain fort of jaundice, a con- fumption, and the greateft part of chronical diftem- pers. For that purpofe he made ufe of the juices of feveral plants, as celery; to which he fometimes added aromatic drugs, making the patients fnuff up this mix¬ ture into their noftrils. He ufed alfo powders com¬ pounded of myrrh, the flowers of brafs, and white hellebore, which he caufed them put up into the nofe, to make them fneeze, and to draw the phlegm from the brain. For the fame purpofe alfo he ufed what he calls tetragonon, that is, “ fomething having four angles;” but what this was, is now altogether un¬ known, and was fo even in the days of Galen. The latter phyfician, however, conjedlures it to be antimo¬ ny, or certain flakes found in it. In the diftemper called empyema (or a co'ledlion of matter in the breaft), he made ufe of a very rough me¬ dicine. He commanded the patient to draw in his tongue as much as he was able; and when that was done, he endeavoured to put into the hollow of the lungs a liquor that irritated the part, which, railing a violent cough, forced the lungs to difeharge the purulent matter contained in them. The materials that he ufed for this purpofe were of different forts; fometimes he took the root of arum, which he ordered to be boiled with a little fait, in a fufficient quantity of wa¬ ter and oil ; diffolving a little honey in it At other times, when he intended to purge more ftrongly, he took the flowers of copper and hellebore ; after that he (hook the patient violently by the (boulders, the better to loofen the pus. This remedy, according to Galen, he received from the Cnidian phyficians ; and < it has never been ufed by the fucceeding ones, probably becaufe the patients could not fuffer it. 20 Blood-letting was another method of evacuation His maxim* pretty much ufod by Hippocrates. Another aim he i^fpedting had in this, befides the mere evacuation, was to divert b.loo<1 ^et' or recal the courfe of the blood when he imagined itUns‘ was going where it ought not. A third end of bleed¬ ing was to procure a free motion of the blood and fpi- H 2 rits, O X M E D I C I N E. Hiftory* ifpo- ths, as we may gather from the following paffage : be taken from the parts farthell off, with a Jefign to Hippo- cratei' “ When any one becomes fpeechlefs of a fudden divert the blood infenfibly from the feat of pain. The crates* . (fays he), it is caufed by the (hutting of the veins, higheft buniing fevers^ which (how neither iigns.of in- ' > especially when it happens to perfons otherwife in ^animation nor pain,, he does not rank among thofe good health, without any outward violence. In thiV diftempers that require, bleeding. On the contrary, cafe the inward vein of the right-arm mud be opened, he maintains that aTever itfelf is in fome cafes a reaforv and more or lefs blood taken away, according to the age or conftitution of the patient. Thofe that lofe their fpeech thus have great flufhings in their face, their eyes are (tiff, their arms are diftended, their teeth gnafli, they have palpitations of the arteries, cannot open their jaws, the extremities are cold, and the fpi- rits are intercepted in the veins. If pain enfues, it is by the acceffion of the black bile and (harp humours. For the internal', parts being vellicated or irritated by thefe humours,,fuffer very much: and the veins, being alfo irritated and. dried, diftend themfelves extraordi¬ narily, and are inflamed, and draw all that chn flow, to them; fo that the blood corrupting, and the fpirits not being able to pafs through the blbod by . their or¬ dinary paflages, the parts grow cold by reafon of this ftagnation of the fpirits. Hence come giddinefs, lofe of fpeeeh, and convulfions, if this difdrder reaches to the heart, the liver, or to the great veins. From hence arife alfo epilepfies and palfies, if the defluxions fall upon the parts laft mentioned ; and that they dry up, becaufe the fprrits are denied a paffage through them. In this cafe, after fomentation, a vein muff be opened, while the fpirits and humours are yet fufpended and unfettled. ” Hippocrates had alfo a fourth intention for bleed¬ ing, and this was refrefhment. So in the iliac paffion, he orders bleeding in the arm and in the head; to the end, fays he, that the fuperior venter, or the bread, may ceafe ta be overheated. With regard to this eva¬ cuation, his conduct was much the fame as to purging, in refpeft of time and perfons. We ought, fays he, to let blood in acute difeafes, when they are violent, if the party be lufty and in the flower of his age. We ought alfo to have regard to the time, both in refpeft to the difeafe and to the feafon in which we let blood. He alfo informs us, that blood ought to be let in great pains, and particularly in inflammations. Among thefe he reckons fiich as fall upon the principal vifcera, as the liver,, lungs, and fpken, as alfo the quinfy and pleurify, if the pain of the latter be above the dia¬ phragm. In thefe cafes he would have the patients blooded till they faint, efpecially if the pain be very acute; or rather he advifes that the orifice (hould not be clofed till the colour of the blood alters, fo that from livid it turn red, or from red livid. In a quinfey he blooded in both arms at once.. Difficulty of breathing he alfo reckons among the diftempers that require bleeding; and he mentions another fort of inflamma¬ tion of the lungs, which he calls a fwellisg or tumor of the lungs ariiing from heat; in which cafe he ad¬ vifes to bleed in all parts of the body; and dire&s par¬ ticularly to the arms, tongue, and noftrils. To make bleeding the more ufeful in all pains, he dire&ed to open the vein neareft the part affe&ed; in a pleurify he direfts to take blood from the arm of the fide affec¬ ted; and for the lame reafon, in pains of the head, he diredfs the veins of the nofe and forehead to be opened. When the pain was not urgent, and bleeding was ad- vifcd by way of prevention, he direded the blood to againft bleeding. If any one, fays he, has an ulcer in the head, he muft‘ bleed, .unlefs he has a fever. He fays further, thofe that lofe their fpeech - of a fudden muft be blooded,, unlefs they have a fever. Perhaps he was afraid of bleeding in fevers, becaufe he fuppofed thatr they were produced by the bile and pkuita, which grew hot, and. afterwards heated the whole body, which is, fays he, what we call fever, and which, in his opinion, cannot well be. evacuated by bleeding. In other places alio be looks upon the prefence or abun¬ dance of bile to bean objection to bleeding; and he orders to forbear venefedtion even in a pleurify, if there be bile. To this we muft add, that Hippocrates di- ftinguilhed very particularly between a fever which followed no other diftemper, but was itfelf the original malady, and a fever which came upon i nil am mu t ion. In the early ages of phyfic, the firft were only proper¬ ly called fevers: the others took their names from the. parts affedted; as pleurify, peripneumony, hepatitis, ne¬ phritis, &c. which names fignify that the pleura, the lungs, the liver, or the kidneys, are difeafed, but da not intimate the fever which accompanies the difeafe. In. this latter fort of fever Hippocrates conftantly or- dered bleeding, but not in the former. Hence, in his books Of Epidemic Diftempers, we find but few di- redtions for bleeding in the acute diftempers, and par¬ ticularly in the great number of continual and burning fevers there treated of. In the firft and third book we find but one iingle inftance of bleeding, and that in a pleurify ; in which, too, he ftaid till the eighth day of the diftemper. Galen, however, and moft o- ther commentators on Hippocrates, are of opinion that he generally blooded his patients plentifully in the beginning of acute diforders, though he takes no no¬ tice of it in his writings. But had this been the cafe,' he would not perhaps have had the opportunity of feeing fo many fevers terminate by crifes, or natural evacua¬ tions, which happen of themfelves on certain days* Hippocrates, in fadf, laid fo much weight upon the affiftance of nature and the method of diet, which was his favourite medicine, that he thought if they took care to diet the patients before mentioned, according to rule, they might leave the reft to nature. Thefe are his principles, from which he never deviates; fo that his pieces Of Epidemical Difeafes feem to have been compofed only with an intention to leave to po- fterky an exadt model of management in purfuance of thefe principles. With regard to the rules laid down by Hippocrates for bleeding, we muft further take notice, that in a l difeafes winch had their feat above the liver, he blood¬ ed in the arm, or in fome of the upper parts of the body ; but for thofe that were fituated below’ it he opened the veins of the foot, ankle, or ham. If the belly was too laxative; and bleeding was at the fame time thought neceffary, he ordered the loofenefs to be flopped before bleeding. Almoft all thefe inftances, however, regard fcarce any thing but acute diftempers; but we find feveral Hiftory, M E D I Hippo- concernrng chronical dlfeafes. “ A young man com . crate!i- plained of great pain in his belly, with a rumbling ' ~ while he was falling, which ceafed after eating: this pain and rumbling continuing, his meat did him no ! good; but, on the contrary, he daily wafted and grew lean. Several medicines, as well purges as vomits, were given him in vain. At length it was refolved to bleed him by intervals, firftin one arm and then in the other, till he had fcarce any blood left, and by this method he w'as perfedtly cured.” Hippocrates let blood" alfo in a dropfy, even in a tympany -r and in both cafes he prefcribes bleeding in the arm. In- a dileafe occalioned by an overgrown fpleeh, he propofes bleeding feveral times repeated at a vein of the arm which he calls the 'fphmetic; and in a hind of jaundice, he propofes bleeding under the tongue. On fome occalions he took away great quan¬ tities of blood, as appears from what we have already obferved. Sometimes he continued the blooding till the patient fainted : at other times he would bloody in both arms at once ; at others, he did it in feveral pla¬ ces of the body, and at feveral times. The veins he opened were thofe of the arm, the hands, the ankles onvboth fid'es, the hams, the forehead, behind the head, the tongue, the nofe, behind the ears, under the breafts, and thofe of the arms; befides which, he burnt others, and opened feveral arteries. He likewife ufed cup- ping-vcftels, with intent to recal or withdraw the humours which fell upon any part. Sometimes he contented hinrfelf with the bare attraflion made by the cupping-vedels, but fometimes alfo he made fcari- fications. ax When bleeding and purging, which were the prin- Hismaximscipal and moft general means ufed by Hippocrates diuretics^ ^or tak'ng off a plethora, proved infufficient for that and i'udori- purpofe, he had recourfe to diuretics and fudorifics. £cs. The former were of different forts, according to the eonftitution of the perfons: fometimes baths, and fometimes fweet wine, were employed to provoke urine; fometimes the nourifhment which we take con¬ tributes to it: and among ft thofe herbs which are commonly eaten, Hippocrates recommends garlic, leeks, onions, c ucumbers, melons, gourds, fennel, and all other things which have a biting talle and a ftrong fmell. With thefe he numbers honey, mixed with water or vinegar, and all fait meats. But, on fome occafions, he took four cantharides, and, pulling off their wings and feet, gave them in wine and honey. Thefe reme¬ dies were given in a great number of chronical di- ftempers after purging, when he thought the blood was overcharged with a fort of moifture which he calls ichor; or in fuppreffions of urine, and when it was made in lefs quantity than it ought. There were alfo fome cafes in which he would force fweat- as well as. uriHe ; but he neither mentions the difeafes in which fudorifics are proper, nor lets us know what medicines are to be ufed for this purpofe, except in one iingle paffage, where he mentions fweating, by pouring upon the head a great quantity of water till the feet fweat; that is, till the fweat diffufes itfelf over the whole body, running from head to foot. After this he would have them eat boiled meat, and drink pure wine, and being well covered with clothes, lay themfelves down to reft. The difeafe for which he propofes the above mention¬ ed remedy is a fever; which is not, according to him,. CINE. produced by bile or pituita, bpt by mere laffilude, or fome other fimilar caufe; from whence we may con¬ clude that he did not approve of fweating in any other kind of fever. Other remedies which Hippocrates tells us he made ufe of were thofe that purged neither bile nor phlegm, but a6t bv cooling, drying, heating, moiftening, or by doling and thickening, refolving and diffipating. Thefe medicines, however, he does not particularly mention ; and it is probable they were only fome particular kinds of food. To thefe he joined hypnotics., or fuch things as procure fleep; hut thefe laft were ufed very ftldom, and, it is moft probable, were only different prepara¬ tions of poppies. Laftly, befides the medicines already mentioned,ufe ho which adied in a fenfible manner, Hippocrates ^ ufe of others called fpecifics ; whofe adtion he did not underftand, and for the ufe of which he could give no reafon befides his own experience," or that of other phyficians. Thefe he had learned from his prede- ceffors the defeendanfs of ALfculapius, who, being empirics, did not trouble themfelves about inquiring into the operation of their remedies, provided their patients were cured. 23 Of the external remedies preferibed by Hippos His exter- crates, fomentations were the chief. Thefe were.of two kinds. The one was a fort of bath, in which the patient fat in a veffel full of a decoction of fimples appropriated to his malady ; fo that the part affected was foaked in the decodtion. This was chiefly ufed in diffempers of the womb,, of the arms, the bladder, the reins, and generally all the parts, below the dia¬ phragm. The fecond way of fomenting was, to take pom^ta„ warm water and put it into a fkin or bladder, or even -ion,, into a copper or earthen veffel,. and to apply it to the part affected ; as, for example, in a pleurify. They ufed likevvife a. larg.e fponge, which they dipped in the water, or other hot liquor, and fqueezed out part of the liquor before they applied it. The fame ufe they made of barley, vetches, or. bran, which were boiled in fome proper liquor, and applied in a linen bag. Thefe are called mo'jl fomentations. The dry ones were made of fait or millet, heated confiderably,. and applied to the part. Another kind of fomenta¬ tion was the vapour of fome hot liquor; an inftance. of which we find in his firft hook .of Womens Diftern- pers. He call, at feveral times, bits of red-hot iron into urine, and, covering up theqratient clofe, caufed her to receive the fleam below. His defign in thtfe kinds of fomentations was to warm the part, to re- folve or diflipate, and draw out the peccant matter, to mollify and affuage pain, to open the paffages, or even to fhut them, according as the fomentations were emol¬ lient or aftringent. Fumigations were likewife very often ufed by-Hip-Himiga* pocrates. In the quinfey, he burned hyflop with’10”8' fulphur and pitch, aifo caufed the fmoke to be drawn into the. throat by a funnel; and by this means he brought away abundance of phlegm through the mouth and through the nofe. For this purpofe he took nitre, maijoram, and crefs-feeds, which he boiled in water, vinegar, and oil, and, while it was on the fire, caufed the patient to draw in the fleam by a pipe- In his works we find a great number of fumigants for the diftempers of women, to promote the menftrual flux;, Colly,:: MED! flmr,to check It, to help conception, and to cafe pains in the matrix, or the fuffocation of it. On thefe oc- cafions he ufed fitch aromatics as were then known, viz. cinnamon, caffia, myrrh, and feveral odoriferous plants; likewife fome minerals, fuch as nitre, fulphur, and pitch, and canted them to receive the vapours through a funnel into the uterus. Gargles, a kind of fomentations for the mouth, were alfo known to Hippocrates. In the quinfey he ufed a gargle made of marjoram, favory, celery, mint, and nitre, boiled with water and a little vinegar. When this was {trained, they added honey to it, and walked their mouths frequently with it. Oils and ointments were likewife much ufed by Hippocrates, with a view to mollify and abate pain, to ripen boils, refolve tumors, refrefh after wearinefs, make the body fupple, &e. For this purpofe, fome- times pure oil of olives was ufed ; fometimes certain fimples were infufed in it, as the leave's of myrtle and rofes ; and the latter kind of oil was in much requeil among the ancients. There were other forts of oils fometimes in ufe, however, which were much more compounded. Hippocrates fpeaks of one called/w/f- tmm, which was made of the flowers of the iris, of fome aromatics, and of an ointment of narciflus made with the flowers of narciflus and aromatics infufed in oil. But the mofl compounded of all his ointments was that called netopum, which he made particularly for women ; and confided, according to Hefychius, of a great number of ingredients. Another ointment, to which he gave the name of ceratum, was cempofed of oil and wax. An ointment which he recommends for the foftening of a tumor, and the cleanfing of a wound, was made by the following receipt: “ Take the quantity of a nut of the marrow or fat of a {beep,' of maftic or turpentine the quantity of a bean, and as much wax; melt thefe over a fire, with oil of rofes, for a ceratum.” • Sometimes he added pitch and wax, and, v>nth a fufficient quantity of oil, made a compo- jition fomewhat more confident than the former, which he called cerapi/fm. . Cataplafms were a fort of remedies lefs confident "■ than the two former. They were made of powders or herbs deeped or boiled in water or fome other li¬ quor, to which fometimes they added oil. They were tiled with a view to foften or refolve tumors, ripen abfcefics, &c . though they had alfo cooling cataplafms made of the leaves of beets or oak, fig or olive-trees, boiled in water. Ladly, to complete the catalogue of the external ^remedies ufed by Hippocrates, we diall mention a fort of medicine called collyrium. It was compounded of powders, to which was added a fmall quantity of feme ointment, or juice of a plant, to make a folid or •dry mafs; the form of which was long and round, which was kept for ufe. Another compofition of much the fame nature was a fort of lozenge of the bignefs of a fmall piece of money, which was burnt upon coals for a perfume, and powdered for par- t cular ufes. In his works we find likewife deferip- tions of powders for feveral ufes, to tifke off fungous fleff, and to blow into the eyes in opthalmies, &c. k hefe were almoft all the medicines ufed by Hip¬ pocrates for external purpofes. The compound me¬ dicines given inwardly were either liquid, folid, or lambative. The liquid ones were prepared either by CINE. Hl^orj decoftion or infufion in a proper liquor, which, when Hippo-j {trained, was kept for ufe ; or by macerating certain powders in fuch liquors, and fo taking them toge¬ ther-, or By mixing different kinds of liquors toge¬ ther. The folid medicines confifted of juices infpif- fated ; of gums, refins, or powders, made up with them or. with honey, or fomething proper to give the neceffary confillence to the medicine. Thefe were made up in a form and quantity fit to be fwallowed with eafe. The lambative was of a confiftence bet tween folid and fluid; and the patients were obliged to keep it for fome time to diffolve in the mouth, that they might fwallow it leifurely. This remedy was ufed to take off the acrimony of thofe humours which fometimes fall upon this part, and provoke coughing and other inconveniences. The bafis of this lait com- pofition was honey. *It is worth our obfervati’on, that the compound medicines of Hippocrates were but very few, and cempofed only of four or five ingredients at moft; and that he not only underftood pharmacy, or the art of compounding medicines, but prepared fuch as he ufed himfelf, or caufcd his fervants prepare them in his houfe by his directions. We have thus given fome account of the ftate of medicine as pra&ifed and taught by Hippocrates, who, as we have already obferved, has for many ages been juftly confidered as the father of phyfic. For when we attend to the flute in which he found medicine, and the condition in which he left it, we can hardly be. flow fufficient admiration on the judgment and ac¬ curacy of his obfl-rvatious. After a life fpent in un¬ wearied indiGry, he is faid to have died at Lariffa, a city in Theffaly, in the ioift year of his age, 361 years before the birth of Chrift. After the days of Hippocrates, medicine in ancient Greece gradually derived improvement from the la¬ bour of other phyficians of eminence. And we may particularly mention three to whom its future progrefs feems to have been not a little indebted, viz. Praxa- goras, Erafiftratus, and.Herophilus. The firft phyfician of eminence who differed confi. p 33 derably in his practice from Hippocrates was Praxa- “ " goras. Codius Aurelianus acquaints us, that he made great ufe of vomits in his pradtice, infomuch as to exhibit them in the iliac palfion till the ex¬ crements were difeharged by the mouth. In this di- flemper he alfo advifed, when all other means failed, to open ^he belly, cut the intefline, take out the in¬ durated fasces, and then to few up all again; but this praifice has not probably .been followed by any fub- fequent phyfician. Eraflltratus was a phyfician of great eminence, and flouriflied in the time of Seleucns, one of the Erafiflratn*n' fucceffors of Alexander the Great. According to Galen, he entirely baniflied venefe&ion from medi¬ cine ; though fome affirm that he did not totally dif- card it, but only ufed it lefs frequently than other phyficians. His reafons for difapproving of venefec- tion are as follow-: It is difficult to fucceed in vene- feftion, becaufe we cannot always fee the vein we in¬ tend to open, and becaufe we are not fure but we may open an artery inftead of a vein. We cannot afeertain the true quantity to be taken. If we take too little, the intention is by no means anfwered: if we take too much, we run a rifle of deftroying the patient. The evacuation of the venous blood alfo is ' 6 fuc- 'liflory. M E D I ' rafiftratus. fucceeded by that of the fpirits, which on that oc- —>— cafion pafs from the arteries into the veins. It mu!l Kkewife be obferved, that as the inflammation is formed in the arteries by the blood coagulated in their orifices, venefeftion muft of courfe be ufelefs and of no effeft. As Erafiftratus did not approve of venefe&ion, fo neither did he of purgatives, excepting very rarely, but exhibited clyfters and vomits ; as did alfo his ma¬ tter Chryfippus. He was of opinion, however, that the clyfters Ihould be mild ; and condemned tke large quantity and acrid quality of thofe ufed by the an¬ cients. The reafon why purgatives were not much nfed by him was, that he imagined purging and vene- feftion could anfwet no other purpofe than diminilh- 1 ing the fulnefs of the veffcls ; and for this purpofe he afferted that there were more effe&ual means than ei¬ ther phlebotomy or purging. He afl'erted that the humours difcharged by cathartics were not the fame in the body that they appeared after the difcharge-; but that the medicines changed their nature, and produced a kind of corruption in them. This opinion has lince been embraced by a great number of phyficians. He did not believe' that purgatives adled by attra&ion ; but fubftituted in the place of this principle what Mr Le Clerc imagines to be the fame with Ariftotle’s fug a vacui. The principal remedy fubftituted by him in place of purging and venefection was abftinence. I When this, in conjuft&ion with clyfters and vomits, was not fufficient to eradicate the difeafe, he then had recourfe to exercife. All this was done with a view to diminiih the plenitude, which, according to him, was the mo'l frequent caufe of all difeafcs. Galen alfo informs us, that Erafiftratus had fo great ah opi- fcion of the virtues of fuccory in difeafes of the vifcera and lower belly, and efpecially in thofe of the liver, that he took particular pains to defcribe the method of boiling it, which was, to boil it in water till it I was tender; then to put it into boiling water a fecond time, in order to ddiroy its bitternefs; afterwards to take it out of the water, and preferve it in a vefiel with oil; and laftly, when it is to be ufed, add a little weak vinegar to it. Nay, fo minute and circumftantial was Erafiftratus with regard to the preparation of his fa¬ vourite fuccory, that he gave orders to tie feveral of the plants together, becaufe that was the more com¬ modious method of boiling them. The reft of Era- fiftratus’s medicines corififted almoft entirely of regi¬ men ; to which he added fome topical remedies, fuch as cataplafrhs, fomentations, and un&ions. In Ihort, as he could neither endure compounded medicines, nor fuperftitious and fine-fpun reafonings, he reduced medicine tb a very fimple and compendious art. With regard to furgery, Erafiftratus appears to hav.e been very bold; and as an anatomift he is faid to have been exceedingly cruel, infomuch that he is re- prefented by fome as having diffetbed criminals while v* * £Tyct aftve *• In a fcirrhous liver, or in tumors of that organ, Ccelius Aurelianus obferves, that Erafiftra- | tus made an incifion through the Ikin and integu- ments, and having opened the abdomen he applied medicines immediately to the part affedted. But tho* he was thus bold in performing operations on the liver, yet he did not approve of the paracentefis or tapping in the dropfy j becaufe (faid he} the waters being eva- C I N E. ^ cuated, the liver, which is inflamed and become hard .fiftratus, like a ftone, is more preffed by the adjacent parts ”'“'v which the waters kept at a diftance from it, fo that by this means the patient dies. He declared alfo againft drawing teeth which were not loofe; and ufed to tell thofe who talked with him on this operation, That in the temple of Apollo there was to be feen an inftrument of lead for drawing teeth ; in order to in- finuate that we muft not attempt the extirpation of any but fuch as are loofe, and call for no greater force for their extirpation than what may be fuppofed in an inftrument of lead. Herophilus, the difciple of Praxagoras, and cotem- 34 porary of Erafiftratus, followed a lefs fimple praftice: Herophb he made fo great ufe of .medicines both limple andlu’’ compound, that neither he nor his difciples would undertake the cure of any diforder without them. He feems alfo to have been the firft who treated accurate¬ ly of the dodtrine of pulfes, of which Hippocrates had but a fuperficial knowledge. Galen, however, affirms, that on this fubjedt he involved himfelf in difficulties and advanced abfurdities ; which in¬ deed we are not greatly to wonder at, confidering the time in which he lived. He took notice of a difeafe at that time pretty rare, and to which he aferibes certain fudden deaths. He calls it a pa//v of the heart; and perhaps it may be the fame difeafe with what is now termed the angina pe it oris. According to Celfus, it was about this time that medicine was firft divided into three branches viz. the dietetic, the pharmaceutical, and the chirurgical medi¬ cine. The firft of thefe employed a proper regimen in the cure of difeafes; the fecond, medicines; and the third, the operation of the hands: and the fame author informs us, that thefe three branches became now the bufinefs of as many diftifnft: claffes of men ;. fo that from this time we may date the origin of the three profeflions of phyficians, apothecaries, and fur- geons.—Before this divifion, thofe called phgficians difcharged all the feveral offices belonging to the three profeflions ; and there were only two kinds of them, viz. one called who only gave their advice to the patients, and directions to thofe of an inferior clafs, who were called and worked with their hands either in the performing operations, or in the compofition and application of remedies. ^ The firft grand revolution which happened,in the The iimp*. medicinal art after the days of Herophilus and Era- iics. fiftratus was occafioned by thefounding of the empiric feCt by Serapion of Alexandria about 287 years before Chrift. The divifion into dogmatifts and empirics had indeed fubfifted before ; but about this time the 34 latter party began to grow ftrong, and to have cham- Serai ion, pions publicly afferting its-caufe. Galen informs us, that Serapion ufed Hippocrates very ill in his wri¬ tings, in which he difeovered an excefs of pride, felf- fufficiency, and contempt for all the phylicians that went before him*. ■ We have fome fketebes of his praCftice in Ceelius Aurelianus, from which we may infer that he retained the medicines of Hippocrates and tire other phyficians who went before him, thor he rejeCted their reafoning. We know not what ar¬ guments he advanced for the fupport of has fentiments, fince his works are loft, as well as thoft of the other empirics j and we flrould know nothing at all ©f any Hiftory. M E D I j ATclepiades particular, he thinks, proceeds from the fielh being | perforated with various fmall holes, which convert the nouri/hment received into them into water. Hunger, and efpecially that fpecies of it called fames canina, proceeds from an opening the of large pores of the flomach and belly ; and thiift from an opening of their fmall ones. Upon the fame principles he ac¬ counted for intermittent fevers. Quotidian fevers are caufed by a retention of the largeft corpufcles, thofe of the tertian kind by a retention of corpufcules fome- what fmaller, and quartan fevers are produced by a retention of the fmalleft corpufcles of all. The praftice of Afclepiades was fuited to remove thefe imaginary caufes of diforders. He compofed a book concerning common remedies, which he princi¬ pally reduced to three, viz. geftation, friftion, and the ufe of wine. By various exercifes he prbpofed to render the pores more open, and to make the juices and fmall bodies, which caufe difeafes by their reten¬ tion, pafs more freely; and while the former phy- ficians had not recourfe to geftation till towards the end of long continued diforders, and when the pa¬ tients, tho’ entirely free from fever, were yet too weak to take fufficient exercife by walking, Afclepiades ufed geftation from the very beginning 6f the moft burn¬ ing fevers. He laid it down as a maxim, that one fever was to be cured by another; that the ftrength of the patient was to be exhaufted by making him watch and endure thirft to fuch a degree, that, for the two firft days of the diforder, he would not allow them to cool their mouths With a drop of water. Celfus alfo pbferves, that though Afclepiades treated his patients like a butcher during the firft days of the diforder, he indul¬ ged them fo far afterwards as even to give diredtions for making their beds in the lofteft manner. On fe- veral occafions Afclepiades ufed fridtions to open the pores. The dropfy was one of the diftempers in which this remedy was ufed ; but the moft fmgular attempt was, by this means, to lull phrenetic patients afleep. But though he enjoined exercife fo much to the lick, he denied it to thofe in health ; a piece of condudt not a little furprifing and extraordinary. He allowed wine freely to patients in fevers, provided the violence of the diftemper was fomewhat abated. Nor did he forbid it to thofe who were afflidted with a phrenzy: nay, he ordered them to drink it till they were intoxicated, pretending by that means to make them fleep; be- caufe, he faid, wine had a narcotic quality and procured fleep, which he thought abfolutely neceffary for thofe who laboured under that diforder. To lethargic pa¬ tients he ufed it on purpofe to excite them, and roufe their fenfes: he alfo made them fmell ftrong-feented fubftances, fuch as vinegar, caftor, and rue, in order to make them fneeze; and applied to their heads cata- plafms of muftard made up with vinegar. Befides thefe remedies,' Afclepiades enjoined his pa¬ tients abftinence to an extreme degree. For the firft; three days, according to Celfus, he allowed them no aliment whatever ; but on the fourth began to give them vi&uals. According to Caelius Aurelianus, how¬ ever, he began to nourifti his patients as foon as the acceflion of the difeafe was diminilhed, not waiting till an entire remiSon; giving to feme aliments on the firft, to others on the fecond, to others on the third, and fo on to the feventh day. It feems almoft incredible to us, that people ihould be able to fail till Vol. XL Part I. CINE. 65 this laft mentioned term ; but Celfus aiTures us, that Afclerudv* abftinence till the feventh day was enjoined by the v——v**—-' predeceffors of Afclepiades, and by Heraclides Taren- tinus. The next great revolution which happened in the medicinal art, was brought about by Themifon, the difciple of Afclepiades, who lived not long before the time of Celfus, during the end of the reign of Augu- ftus, or beginning of that of Tiberius. . The fe6t ^ founded by him was called methrdic, becaufe he endea-'\yet£0'];c voured to find a method of rendering medicine, more feift. eafy than formerly. < . He maintained, that a knowledge of the caufes of rhemifun. difeafes was not neceffary, provided we have a due re¬ gard to what difeafes have in common and analogous to one another. In confequence of this principle, he divided all difeafes into two, or at moft three, kinds. The firft included difeafes arifing from ftridhire ; the fecond, thofe ariling from relaxation ; and the third, thofe of a mixed nature, or fuch as partook both of ftrifture and relaxation. Themifon alfo afferted, that difeafes are fometimes acute, and fometimes chronical; that for a certain time they increafe; that at a certain time they are at their height; and that at laft they were obferved to dimi- flifh. Acute difeafes, therefore, according to him, miift be treated in one way, and chronical ones in an¬ other ; one method muft be followed with fuch as are in their augmentation, another with fuch as are at their height, and a third with fuch as are fn their de- clenfion. He afferted, that the whole of medicine con- fifted in the obfervation of that fmall number of rules which are founded upon things altogether evident. He faid, that all diforders, whatever their nature was, if included under any of the kinds above mentioned, ought to be treated precifely in the fame way, in what¬ ever country and with whatever fymptoms they hap¬ pen to arife. Upon thefe principles, he defined me¬ dicine to be a method of conducing to the knowledge of what difeafes have in common with each other, and which at the fame time is evident. Themifon was old when he laid the foundation of the Methodic fe& ; and it was only brought to perfec- tion by Theffalus, who lived under the emperor Nero. Thelfalus. Galen and Pliny accufe this phyfician of intolerable in - folence and vanity, and report that he gave himfelf the air of defpifing all other phyficians; and fo intole¬ rable was his vanity, that he affumed the title of the conqueror of phyjiciatis, which he caufed to be put up¬ on his tomb in the Appian way. Never was moun¬ tebank (fays Pliny) attended by a greater number of fpedlators than Theffalus had generally about him ; and this circumftance is the lefs to be wondered at, if we confider that he promifed to teach the whol£ art of medicine in. lefs than fix months. In reality, the art might be learned much fooner if it comprehended no more than what the methodifts thought neceffary : for they cut off the examination of the caufes of difeafes followed by the dogmatics; and fubftituted in the room of the laborious obfervations of the empirics, indica¬ tions drawn from the analogy of difeafes, and the mu¬ tual refemblance they bear to each other. The moft fkilful of all the methodic feft, and he who put the laft hand to it, was Soranus. He lived under the emperors Trajan and Adrian, and was a native of Ephefus. One of the moft celebrated medical writers of an- Celius. I tiquity 66 M E D I Celfi.'p. t'quity was Celfus, whom we have already had oc- cafion to mention. Moft writers agree that he lived in the time of Tiberius, but his country is uncertain. It is even difputcd whether or not he was a profeffed phyfician. Certain it is, however, that his b(^oks on medicine are the moft valuable of all the ancients next to thofe of Hippocrates. From the latter, indeed, he has taken fo much, as to acquire the name of the La¬ tin Hippocrates; but he has not attached himfelf to him fo clofely as to rejeft the afliftance of other au¬ thors. In many particulars he has preferred Afcle- piades. With him he laughs at the critical days of Hippocrates, and afcribes the invention of them to a foolifh and fuperftitious attachment to the Pythago¬ rean do&rine of numbers. He alfo rejected the doc¬ trine-of Hippocrates with regard to venefeftion, of which he made a much more general ufe ; but did not take away fo much at a time, thinking it mueh better to repeat the operation than weaken the patient by too great an evacuation at one time. Fie ufed cupping alfo much more frequently, and differed from him with regard to purgatives. In the beginning of dif- orders, he faid, the patients ought to endure hunger and third:: but afterwards they were to be nouridied with good aliments; of which, however, they were not to take too much, nor fill themfelves all of a fudden, after having faffed. He does not fpecify how long the patient ought to praftife abftinence ; but affirms, that in this particular it is rieceffary to have a regard to the difeafe, the patient, the feafon, the climate, and other circumftances of a like nature. The figns drawn from the pulfe he looked upon.to be very precarious and uncertain. “ Some (fays he) lay great ftrefs up¬ on the beating of the veins or the arteries ; which is a deceitful circumftance, fince that beating is flow or quick, and varies very much, according to the age, fex, and conftitution of the patient. It even fometimes happens that the pulfe is weak and languid when the ftomach is difordered, or in the beginning of a fever, though in other refpetfts the body be in a good date ; fo that we might, in this latter cafe, be induced to be¬ lieve, that a man is very weak, when he is juft enter¬ ing into a violent paroxyfm, has ftrength enough left, and may be eafily recovered from it. On the con¬ trary, the pulfe is often high, and in a violent com¬ motion, when one has been expofed to thj fun, or comes out of a bath, or from ufingexercife ; or when one is under the influence of anger, fear, or any other paflion. Befides, the pulfe ,is eafily changed by the arr ived of the phyircian, in confequence of the patient’s anxiety to know what judgement he will pafs upon his cafe. To prevent this, the phyfician muft not feel the patient’s pulfe on his firft arrival: he muft firft fit down by him, affume a chearful air, inform himfelf of his con¬ dition ; and if he is under any dread, endeavour to re¬ move it by encouraging difeourfe ; after which he may examine the beating of the artery. This neverthelefs does not hinder us from concluding, that if the fight of the phyiician alone can produce fo remarkable a change in the pulfe, a thoufand other caufes may pro¬ duce the fame efferft.” But although Celfus thought tor himfelf, and in not a few particulars differed from his predeceffors, yet in his writings, which are not only dill preferred, but have gone through almoft innu¬ merable editions, we have a compendious view of the practice of almoft all his predeceffors : and he treats. 3 CINE. Hiftory. of the healing art in all its branches, whether per- Celfu-. formed manu, viftu, vel medicamentis. His writings, v therefore, will naturally be had recourfe to by every one who wifhes either to become acquainted with the pra&ice of the ancients prior to the fall of the Roman empire, or to read medical Latin in its greateft pu- rit^' 4r About the 131ft year after Chrift, in the reign of Galen- the emperor Adrian, lived the celebrated Galen, a na¬ tive of Pergamus, whofe name makes fuch a confpicu- ous figure in the hiftory of phyfic. At this time the dogmatic, empiric, methodic, and other fefts, had each their abettors. The methodics were held in great efteem, and looked upon to be fuperior to the dogmatics, who were ftrangely divided among them¬ felves, fome of them following Hippocrates, others Erafiftratus, and others Afclepiades. The empirics made the leaft confiderable figure of any. Galen un¬ dertook the reformation of medicine, and reftored dogmatifm. He feems to have been of that feet which was called eclectic, from their choofing out of different authors what they efteemed good in them, without being particularly attached to any one more than the reft. This declaration he indeed fets out with; but, notwithftanding this, he~ follows Hippo- crates much more than any of the reft, or rather fol¬ lows nobody elfe but him. Though before his time feveral phylicians had commented on the works of Hippocrates, yet Galen pretends that none of them had underftood his meaning. His firft attempt there¬ fore was to explain the works of Flippocrates ; with which view he wrote a great deal, and after this fet about compofing a fyftem of his own- In one of his books entitled, “ Of the eftablifliment of medicine,” he defines the art to be one which teaches to pre- ferve health and cure difeafes. In another book, however, he propofes the following definition : “ Me¬ dicine (fays he) is a fcience which teaches what is found, and what is not fo ; and what is of an indiffe¬ rent nature, or holds a medium between what is found and what is the reverie.” He affirmed, that there are three things which conftitute the objeft of medicine, and which the phyiician ought to confider as found, as not found, or of a neutral and indifferent nature. Thefe are the body itfelf, the figns, and' the caufes He efleems the human body found, when it is in a good ftate or habit with regard to the Ample parts of which it is compofed, and when beiides there is a juft proportion between the organs formed of thefe Ample parts. On the contrary, the body is reckoned to be unfound, when it recedes from this ftate, and the julf proportion above mentioned. It -is in a ftate of neu¬ trality or indifference, when it is in a medium between foundnefs and its oppofite ftate. The falutary figns are fuch as indicate prefent health, and prognofticater that the man may remain in that ftate for £bme time to come. The infalubrious’figns, on the contrary, indi¬ cate a prefent diforder, or lay a foundation forfufpec- ting the approach of one: The neutral, figns, or fuch as are,of an indifferent nature, denote neither health nor indifpofition, either for the prefent, or for the time to. come. In like manner he fpeaks of caufes falutary, unfalutary,, and indifferent. Thefe three difpofitions of the human body, that is, foundnefs, its reverfe, and a neutral ftate, comprehend all the differences between health and diforder or in- difpo- Hiftory. MEDICINE. Galen, difpofition : and each of thefe three ftates or difpo- tions has a certain extent peculiar to itfejf. A found habit of body, according to the definition of it already given, is very rare, and perhaps never to be met with ; but this does not hinder us to fuppofe fuch a model for regulating our judgment with refpeft to different con- flitutions. On this principle Galen eftablifhes eight other principal conftitutiens, all of' which differ more or lefs from the perfeft model abovementioned. The four firft are fuch as have one of the four qualities of hot, cold, moift, or dry, prevailing in too great a degree ; and accordingly receive their denomination from that quality which prevails over the reft. The four other fpecies of conftitutions receive their deno¬ minations from a combination of the abovementioned ; fo that, according to his definition, there may be a hot and dry, a hot and moift, a cold and moift, and a cold and dry, conftitution. Befides thefe differences, there are certain others which refult from ocult and latent caufes, and which, by Galen, are faid to arife from an idiofyncrafy of conftitution. It is owing to this idiofyncrafy that fome have an averfion to one kind of aliment and fome to another ; that fome cannot en¬ dure particular fmells, &c. But though thefe eight laft-mentioned conftitutions fall fhort of the perfec¬ tion of the firft, it does not thence follow, that thofe to whom they belong are to be claffed among the va¬ letudinary and difeafed. A difeafe only begins when the deviation becomes fo great as to hinder the a£tion of the parts. * Galen defcribes at great length the figns of a good or bad conftitution, as well as thofe of what he calls a neutral habit. Thefe figns are drawn from the origi¬ nal qualities of cold, hot, moift, and dry, and from their juft proportion or difproportion with refpeft to the bulk, figure, and fituation, of the organical parts. With Hippocrates he eftablifhes three principles of an animal body ; the parts, the humours, and the fpirits. By the parts he properly meant no more than the fo- lid parts ; and thefe he divided into fimilar and orga- nical. Like Hippocrates, he alfo acknowledged four humours ; the bloocl, the phlegm, the yellow bile and black bile. He eftablifhed three different kinds of fpirits; the vital, the animal, and the natural. The firft of thefe are, according to him, nothing elfe but a fubtle vapour arifing from the blood, which draws its origin from the liver, the organ or inftrument of fan- guification. After thefe fpirits are conveyed to the heart, they, in eonjun&ion with the air we draw into the lungs, become the matter of the fecond fpecies, that is, of the vital fpirits, which are again changed into thofe of the animal kind inthebrSin. He fuppo- fed that thefg three fpecies of fpirits ferved as inftru- ments to three kinds cf faculties, which refide in the refpeftive parts where thefe faculties are formed. The natural faculty is the firft of thefe, which he placed in the liver, and imagined to prefide over the nutrition, growth, and generation, of the animal. The vital fa¬ culty he lodged in the heart, and fuppofed that by means of the arteries it communicated w armth and life to all the body. The animal faculty, the nobleft of all the three, and with which the reafoning or go¬ verning faculty was joined, according to him, has its feat in the brain ; and, by means cf the nerves, dif- tributes a power of motion and fenfation to all the parts, and prefides ever all the other faculties. The original fource or principle of motion in all thefe fa¬ culties, Galen, as well as Hippocrates, defines to be Nature. Upon thefe principles Galen defined a difeafe to be “ fuch a preternatural difpofition or affe&ion of the parts of the body, as primarily, and of itfelf, hinders their natural and proper aftion.” He eftablifhed three principal kinds of difeafes : the firft relates te the fi¬ milar parts; the fecond, to the organical; and the third is common to both thefe parts. The firft kind of difeafes confifts in the intemperature of the fimilar parts ; and this is divided into an intemperature with¬ out matter, and an intemperature with matter. The firft difeovers itfelf when a part has more or lefs heat or cold than it ought to have without that change of quality in the part being fupported and maintained by any matter. Thus, for inftance, a perfon’s head may be overheated and indifpofed by being expofed to the heat of the fun, without that heat being maintained by the continuance or congeftion of any hot humour in the part. The fecond fort of intemperature is when any part is not only rendered hot or cold, but alfo fill¬ ed with a hot or cold humour, which are the caufes of the heat or cold felt in the part. Galen alfo ac¬ knowledged a Ample intemperature : that is, when one of the original qualities, fuch as heat or cold, exceeds alone and feparately ; and a compound intemperature, when two qualities are joined together, fuch as heat and drynefs, or coldnefs and humidity. He alfo efta- blilhed an equal and unequal temperature. The for¬ mer is that which is equally in all the body, or in any particular part of it, and whrdr creates no pain, be- caufe it is become habitual, fuch as drynefs in the hec¬ tic conftitution. The latter is diftinguifhed from the former, in that it docs not equally fubfift in the whole of the body, or in the whole of a part. Of this kind of intemperature we have examples in certain fevers, where heat and cold, equally, and almoft at the fame time, attack the fame part; or in other fevers, which render the furface of the body cold as ice, while the internal parts burn with heat; or laftly, in cafes where the ftomach is cold and the liver hot. The fecond kind of diforders, relating to the orga¬ nical parts, refults from irregularities of thefe parts, with refpeft to the number, bulk, figure, fituation, &e.; as when one has fix fingers, or only four ; when one has any part larger or fmaller than it ought to be, &c. The third kind, which is common both to the fimilar and the organical parts, is a folution of conti¬ nuity, which happens when any fimilar or compound part is cut, bruited, or corroded. Like Hippocrates, Galen diftinguifhed difeafes into acute and chronical; and, with refpedf to their nature and genius, into benign and malignant; alfo into epi¬ demic, endemic, and fporadic. After having diftinguifhed the kinds of difeafes, Ga¬ len comes to explain the caufes ; which he divides into external and internal. The external caufes of difeafes, according to him, are fix things, whi.h contribute to the prefervation of health when they are well difpofed and properly ufed, but produce a contrary effect when they are imprudently ufed or ill difpofed. Thefe fix things are, the air, aliments and drink, motion and reft, fleeping and watching, retention and excre¬ tion, and laftly the paffions. All thefe are called the procatardic or beginning caufes, becaufe they put I 2 in 68 which prevails over the reft. According to thefe prin- ciples, there may he a fanguine, a bilious, a pituitous, or a melancholy plenitude : but there is this difference between the fanguine and the three other plenitudes, MEDICINE. Hiftory^jU in motion the internal caufes ; which are of two kinds, Galen’s method of teaching the medical art, it is evi- Galen- the antecedent and the conjunil. The former is dif- dent that his fyftem was little elfe than a colle&ion of v—— covered, only by reafoning ; and confifts for the moft fpeculations, diftinftions, and reafonings ; whereas that part in a peccancy of the humours, either by pleni- of Hippocrates was founded immediately upon fafts, tude or cacochymy, i. e. a bad Hate of them. When which he had either obferved himfelf, or had learned the humours are in too large a quantity, the cafe is from the obfervation of others. called a plethora ; but we muft obferve, that this word The fyftem of Galen, however, notwithftanding its equally denotes too large a quantity of all the humours defefts and abfurdities, remained almoft uncontradift- together, or a redundance of one particular humour ed for a very long period. Indeedit may be consider¬ ed as having been the prevailing fyftem till the inun¬ dation of the Goths aud Vandals put an almoft entire flop to the cultivation of letters in Europe. But du¬ ring the general prevalence of the fyftem of Galen, that the blood, which is the matter of the former, may there appealed fome writers to whom medicine was in- far furpafs the reft : whereas, if any of the three laft debted for improvements, at leaft in certain particulars, mentioned ones do fo, the cafe is no longer called p/eni- Among the moft diftinguiftied of thefe we may men- tude, but cacochymy; becaufe thefe humours, abound- tion Oribafius, JEtius, Alexander, and Paulus. ing more than they ought, corrupt the blood. The Oribafms flouriftied about the year 360, and was0r;bafius. caufes he alfo divides into fuch as are manifeft and evi- phyfician to the emperor Julian. He fpeaks very dent, and fuch as are latent and obfcure. The firft are fully of the effefts of bleeding by way of fcarification, fuch as fpontaneoufly come under the cognizance of a thing little taken notice of by former writers ; from our fenfes when they aft or produce their effefts: the his own experience he aflures us that he had found it lecond are not of themfelves perceptible, but may be fuccefsful in a fuppreffion of the menfes, defluxions difcovered by reafoning: the third fort, i. e. fuch as of the eyes, headach, and ftraitnefs of breathing even he calls occult or concealed, ^cannot be difcovered at all. when the perfon was extremely old. He tells his own Among this laft he places the caufe of the hydro- cafe particularly, when the plague raged in Afia, phobia. . and he himfelf was taken ill, that the fecond day he He next proceeds to confider the fymptoms of dif- fcarified his leg, and took away two pounds of blood; eafes. A fymptom he defines to be “ a preternatural by which means he entirely recovered, as did feveral affeftion depending upon a difeafe, or which follows it others who ufed it. In this author alfo we find the as a fhadow does a body.” He acknowledged three firft defcription of a furprifing and terrible diftemper, kinds of fymptoms : the firft and moft confiderable of which he termed *v*.cvib(tu*a., a fpecies of melancholy thefe confifted in the aftidn of the parts being injured and madnefs, which he defcribes thus. “ The per- or hindered ; the fecond in a change of the quality of fons affefted get out of their houfes in the night-time* the parts, their aftions in the mean time remaining and in every thing imitate wolves, and wander among entire ; the third related to defefts in point of excre- the fepulchres of the dead till day -break. You may tion and retention. know them by thefe fymptoms : i'heir looks are pale ; After having treated of fymptoms, Galen treats of their eyes heavy, hollow, diy, without the leaft moif- the ftgns of difeafes. Thefe are divided into diag- ture of a tear; their tongue exceedingly parched and nojlic and prognojlic. The firft are fo called becaufe dry, no fpittle in their mouth, extreme thirft ; their they enable us to know difeafes, and diftinguifti them legs, from the falls and the bruifes they receive, full from each other. They are of two {arts, pathognomonic of incurable fores and ulcers.” and adjunct. The firft are peculiar to every difeafe, iEtius lived very near the end of the fifth, or in the^.^^5 make known its precife fpecies, and always accom- beginning of the fixth century. Many paflages in pany it, fo that they begin and end with it. The his writings ferve to ftiow us how much the aftual and fecond are common to feveral difeafes, and only ferve potential cautery were ufed by the phyficians of that to point out the difference between difeafes of the age. In a palfy, he fays, that he fliould not at all fame fpecies. In a pleurify, for inftance, the pathog- hefitate to make an efchar either way, and this in fe- nomonic figns are a cough, a difficulty of breathing, a veral places ; one in the nape, where the fpinal mar- pain of the fide, and a continued fever; the adjunft row takes its rife, two on each fide of it; three or figns are the various forts of matter expeftorated, four on the top of the head, one juft in the middle,, whirn lOmPtrmPS Klonrlv. ■TnTYlPtim^Q Kilir\no Rrr> ortrl til****** WMinrl if* T-Tn nAAo f-Vanf’ in f-V»»<* which are fometimes bloody, fometimes bilious, &c. and three others round it. He adds, that in this —The diagnoftic fig/ls were drawn from the defeftive cafe, if the ulcers continue running a good while, he or difordered difpofition of the parts, or from the ftiould not doubt of a perfeft recovery. He is ftill difeafes themfelves ; fecondly, from the caufes of dif- more particular when he comes to order this applica- eafes; thirdly, from their fymptoms; and laftly, from tion for an inveterate afthma, after all other remedies- the particular difpofitions of each body, from things have been tried in vain. One, he fays, fliould bemade which prove prejudicial and thofe that do fervice, on each fide near the middle of the joining of the cla- and from epidemical difeafes.—The proghoftic figns vide, taking care not to touch the wind-pipe : two. he gathered from the fpecies, virulence, and peculiar other little ones are then to be made near the carotids genius of the difeafe : but as we have already foken fo under the chin, one on each fide, fo that the cauftic largely concerning the pr.ognoftics of Hippocrates, may penetrate no further than the fldn ; two others it is fuperfluous to be particular on thofe of Galen.— under the breafts, between the third and fourth ribs ; His method of cure differed little from that of Hip- and again, two more backwards towards the fifth and pocrates ; but from the fpecimen already given of fixth ribs. Befides thefe there ought to be one in the I middle iftory. M E D I 'lEtius. middle of the thorax near the beginning of the xi- phoid cartilage over the orifice of the ftomach; one on each fide between the eighth and ninth ribs ; and three others in the back, one in the middle, and the two others juft below it, on each fide of the vertebrae. Thofe below the neck ought to be pretty large, not very fuperficial, not very deep : and all thefe ulcers ftiould be kept open for a very long time. .5£tius takes notice of the worms bred in different parts of the body called dracunculi, which were un¬ known to Galen. He feems alfo to be the firft Greek writer among the Chriftians, who gives us any fpeci- men of medicinal fpells and charms; fuch as that of a finger of St Blafius for removing a bone which fticks in the throat, and another in relation to a fiftula. He gives a remedy for the gout, which he calls the grand drier ; the patient is to ufe it for a whole year, and obferve the following diet each month. “ in September, he muft eat and drink milk : In Oftober, he muft eat garlic; in November, abftain from ba¬ thing ; in December, he muft eat no cabbage; in January, he is to take a glafs of pure wine in the morning; in February, to eat no beet; in March, to mix fweet things both in eatables and drinkables ; in I April, not to eat horfe-radilh, nor in May the fifh called polypus ; in June, he is to drink cold water in a morning ; in July, to avoid venery ; and laftly, in Auguft, to eat no mallows.” This may fuffi- ciently ftiow the quackery of thofe times, and how fuperftition was beginning to mix itfelf with I the art. UV.. Alexander, who flourilhed in the reign of Juftinianr is a more original author than either of the two for¬ mer. He confines himfelf direftly to the defcribing the figns of difeafes, and the methods of cure, with¬ out meddling with anatomy, the materia medica, or furgery, as all the reft did. He employs a whole book in treating of the gout. One method he takes of relieving this difeafe is by purging ; and in moft of the purges he recommends hermeda&yls, of which he has a great opinion. In a caufus, or burning fever, where the bile is predominant, the matter fit for eva¬ cuation, and the fever not violent, he prefers purging to bleeding, and fays that he has often ordered purging in acute fevers with furprifing fuccefs. In the caufus alfo, if a fyncope happens from crude and redundant humours, he recommends bleeding. 1 n a fyncope fuc- eeeding the fuppreffion of any ufual evacuation, he re¬ commends bleeding, with fridlions. The diagnoftics upon which he founds this practice are the following viz. a face paler and more fwelled than ufual, a bloated habit of body, with a little fluggilh pulfe, having long intervals between the ftrokes. In tertian, and much more in quartan fevers, he recommends vomits above all other remedies, and affirms that by this remedy I alone he has cured the moft inveterate quartans. On the bulimus, or canine appetite, he makes a new ob- fervation, viz. that it is fometimes caufed by worms. He mentions the cafe of a woman who laboured un¬ der this ravenous appetite, and had a perpetual gnaw¬ ing at her ftomach and pain in her head after taking hiera, Are voided a worm above a do?err of cubits long, and was entirely cured of her complaints.—He is alfo the firft author who takes notice of rhubarb ; which he recommends in a weaknefs of the liver and CINE. dyfentery.—Alexander is recommended by Dr Freiqd Alexander, as one of the beft pradlical writers among the ancients, ——v——^ and well worthy the perufal of any modern. 4J Paulus was born in the ifland iEgina, and lived in Paulas, the 7th century. He tranfcribes a great deal from Alexander and other phyficians. His defcriptions are fhort and accurate. He treats particularly of wo¬ mens diforders ; and feems to be the firft inftance up¬ on record of a profeffed man-midwife, for fo he was called by the Arabians : and accordingly he begins his book with the diforders incident to pregnant wo¬ men. He treats alfo very fully of furgery ; and gives fome dire&ions, according to Dr Freind, not to be found in the more ancient writers.. After the downfal of the Roman empire, and when Arabian the inundation of Goths andJ Vandals had almoft Phyfi<:un*- completely exterminated literature of every kind in Europe, medicine, though a pra&ical art, ftiared the fame fate with more abftrad fciences. Learning in general, banifhed from the feat of arms, took refuge among the eaftern nations, where the arts of peace Hill continued to be cultivated. To the Arabian phy¬ ficians, as they have been called, we are indebted both for the prefervation of medical fcience, as it fubfifted among the Greeks and Romans, and likewife for the j defcription of fome new difeafes, particularly the fmall-pox. Among the moft eminent of the Arabians, we may mention Rhafes, Avicenna, Albucafis, and Avenzoar. ^lutof their writings it would be tedious, and is unneceffary to give any particular account They were for the moft part, indeed, only copiers of the Greeks j we are, however, indebted to them for fome improvements. They were the firft who intro¬ duced chemical remedies, though of thefe they ufed but few, nor did they make any confiderable progrefs in the chemical art. Anatomy was not in the lealt im¬ proved by them, nor did forgery receive any advance¬ ment till the time of Albucafis, who lived probably in the 12th century. They added a great deal to botany and the materia medica, by the introduftion of new: drugs, of the aromatic kind efpecially, from the eaft, many of which are of confiderable ufe. They alfo found out the way of making fugar ; and by help of that, fyrups ; which two new materials are of great ufe in mixing up compound medicines. With regard to their pra&ice, in fome few particu¬ lars they deviated from the Greeks. Their purging medicines were much milder than thofe formerly in ufe ; and even when they did prefcribe the old ones, they gave them in a much lefs dofe than formerly. The fame reflection may be made concerning their manner of bleedi*^, which was never to that exceffive degree pradlifed by the Greeks. They deviated from Hippocrates, however,, in one very trivial circum- ftance, which produced a violent controverfy. The queftion was, Whether blood in a pleurify ought to be drawn from the arm of the affefted fide or the oppofite ? Hippocrates had direfted it to be drawn from the arm of the affe&ed fide; but the Arabians, following fome other ancient phyficians, ordered it to be drawn from the oppofite one. Such was the igno¬ rance of thofe ages, that the univerfity of Salamanca in Spain made a decree, that no one ftiould dare to let blood but in the contrary arm ; and endeavoured to procure an edift from the emperor Charles V. to fecoud it 3. 70 M E D I Arabian it ; alleging that the other method was of no lefs per- Phyficiam. i]icious confequenee to medicine, than Luther’s herefy v " had been to religion. In confequence of the general decay of learning in the wellern parts of the world, the Greek writers be¬ came totally forgot, becaufe nobody could read the lan¬ guage ; and the Arabians, though moftly copiers from them, enjoyed all the reputation that was due to the others. The Arabian phyfic was introduced into Europe veiy early, with the moft extravagant ap- plaufe : and not only this, but other branches of their learning, came into repute in the weft; infomuchthat in the nth century, the ftudies of natural philofophy and the liberal arts were called the Jiudies of the Sara- cens. This was owing partly to the crufades under- 48 taken againft them by the European princes ; and College of partly to the fettlement of the Moors in Spain, and fca ernum. ^ intercourfe they and other Arabians had with the Italians. For, long before the time of the crufades, probably in the middle of the 7th century, there were . Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin profeffors of phyfic fettled at Salernum : which place foon grew into fuch credit, that Charles the Great thought proper to found a 49 college there in the year 802 ; the only one at that tine^an" t^me Europe. Conftantine the African flourifhed here towards the latter end of the 11 th century. He was a native .of Carthage ; but travelled into the call, and fpent 30 yjears in Babylon and Bagdad, by which means he became mafter of the oriental languages and learning. He returned to Carthage; but being in¬ formed of an attempt againft Ins' life, made his efcape into Apulia, where he was recommended to Rfiftert Guifcard, created in 1060 duke of that coun¬ try, who made him his fecretary. Fie w’as reputed to be very well verfed in the Greek, as well as the eaftern -State of tongues ; and feems to have been the firft who intro- •incdicir.e in duced either the Greek or Arabian phyfic into Italy, the 15th His works, however, contain nothing that is new, or Centuries mater‘a^ > though he was then counted a very learned man, and for that age no doubt was fo. From this time to the end of the 1 5th and begin¬ ning of the 16th century, the hiftory of phyfic fur- nilhes us with no interefting particulars. This period, however, is famous for the introdu&ion of chemiftry into medicine, and the defeription of three new dif- tempers, the fweating ficknefs, the venereal difeafe, and the feurvy. The fweating ficknefs began in 1483, in the army of Henry VII. upon his landing at Mil- Swearing ford-haven, and fpread itfelf at London from the 21ft .ficknefs in of September to the end of Oftober. It returned here England, five times, and always in fummer ; firft in 1485, then in 1506, afterwards in 1517, when, it was fo violent that it killed marry in the fpace of three hours, fo that numbers of the nobility died, and of the commonalty in feveral towns often the one-half periftred. It ap¬ peared the fourth time in 1528, and then proved mor¬ tal in fix hours ; many of the courtiers died of it, and Henry VIII. himfelf was in danger. In 1529, and Only then, it infefted the Netherlands and Germany, in which laft country it did much mifehief. The laft return of it was in 1551, and in Weftminfterit carried off 120 in a day. Dr Cains deferibes it as a peftilent contagious fever, of the duration of one natural day ; the fweat he reckoned to be only a natural fymptom, or crifis of the diltemper. . It firft afic&ed fume par- C I N E. HifUv. ticular part, attended with inward heat and burning, MojlWs. unquenchable thirft, reftleffnefs, ficknefs at ftomach, but feldom vomiting, headach, delirium, then faint- nefs, and exceffive drowfinefs. The pulfe was quick j and vehement, and the breath ftiort and laborious.— Children, poor and old people, were lefs fubjeft to it. Of others, fcarce any efcaped the attack, and moft of | them died. Even by travelling into France or Flan¬ ders they did not efcape ; and what is ftill more ftrange, j the Scots were faid not to be affected: abroad the Englifh only were feized, and foreigners in England were free. At firft the phyficians were much puzzled how to treat this difeafe. The only cure they ever | found, however, was to carry on the fweat for a long time ; for, if ftopped, it was dangerous or fatal. The j | way, therefore, was for the patient to lie ftill, and not expofe himfelf to cold. If nature was not ftrong j j enough to force out the fweat, it was ueceflary to af- \ j j fill her by art, with cloaths, wine, &c. The violence ’ | ’ of the diltemper was over in 15 hours ; but there was no fecurity for the patient till 24 were palled. In j : fome ftrong conftitutions there was a neceffity to re- | peat the fweating, even to 13 times. The removing out of bed was attended with great danger; fome who had not fweated enough fell into very ill fevers.—. No flelh-meat was to be allowed in all the time of the 1 diftemper; nor drink for the firft five hours. In the feventh, the diftemper increafed ; in the ninth the delirium came on, and lleep was by all means to be avoided. However terrible this diftemper appeared at j firft, it feldom proved obllinate, if treated in the a- bove-mentioned manner. , In the beginning oY the 16th century, the famous paracelf > chemift Paracelfus introduced a new fyllem into me¬ dicine, founded on the principles of his att. The Galenical fyftem had prevailed till his time ; but the practice had greatly degenerated, and was become quite trifling and frivolous. The phyficians rejected the ufe of opium, mercury, and other efficacious re- ] medics. Paiacelfus, who made ufe of thefe, had therefore greatly the advantage over them ; and now all things relating to medicine were explained on ima¬ ginary chemical principles. It will eafily be con¬ ceived that a practice founded in this manner could be no other than the moft dangerous quackery. At this time, however, it was neceffary; for now a new difeafe over-ran the world, and threatened greater de- ftrufilion than almoft all the old ones put together, both by the violence of its fymptoms, and its baffling the moft powerful remedies at that time known.— This was the venereal difeafe, which is faid to have been imported from the Weft-Indies by the companions of Chriftopher Columbus. Its firft remarkable appear- \ ance was at the fiege of Naples in 1494, from whence it was foon after propagated through Europe, Afia, App/a^. and Africa. The fymptoms with which it made the ance of the attack at that time were exceedingly violent, much venereal more fo than they are at prefent; and confequently dlfeafe. were utterly unconquerable by the Galeaifts. The quacks and chemiils, who boldly ventured on mer¬ cury, though they no doubt deftroyed numbers by their exceffive ufe of it, yet ihowed that a remedy for this terrible diftemper was at laft found out, and that a proper method of treating it might fo.on be fallei* upon. Shortly after, the Weft-Indiao fpecific, guaia- cum, jiftory. M E D I tod cm-, cum. was difcovered: the materia medica was enriched i—y 1 and many ©ther valuable medicines, both from the Eaft and Weft-Indies: which contributed confiderably to the improvement of the praftice of phytic. At this period, as fea voyages of confide- rable duration became more frequent, the fcurvy be- 'i came a more frequent diftemper, and was of courfe more accurately defcribed. But probably, from fup- pofed analogy to the contagions which at that time were new in Europe, very erroneous ideas were enter¬ tained with regard to its being of an infeftious nature: » And it is not impoflible, that from its being attended alfo with ulcers, it-was on fome occafions confounded | . with fyphilitic complaints. ' ^fsof The revival of learning, which now took place ildne in throughout Europe, the appearance of thefe new dif- u-th tempers, and the natural fondnefs of mankind for ■ftSth novelty, contributed greatly to promote the advance- series. ment 0f medicine as well as other fciences. While at the fame time, the introduftion of the art of print- | ing rendered the communication of new opinions as well as new practices fo eafy a matter, that to enume- r rate even the names of thofe who have been juftly ren¬ dered eminent for medical knowledge would be a very tedious talk. It was not, however, till 1628 that Dr | William Harvey of London demonftrated and commu- I nicated to the public one of the moft important dif- coveries refpefting the animal economy, the circula¬ tion of the blood. This difeovery, more effeftually JSJ than any reafoning, overturned all the fyftems which Loir- kad fubfifted prior to that time. It may jultly be rec- dion. koned the moft important difeovery that has hitherto been made in the healing art: for there can be no doubt that it puts the explanation of the phenomena ] ' of the animal body, both in a ftate of health and dif- eafe, on a more folid and rational footing than for¬ merly. It has not, however, prevented the rife of numerous fanciful and abfurd fyfteras. Thefe, though fafhionable for a Ihort time, and ftrenuoufly fupported by blind adherents, have yet in no long period fallen into deferved contempt. And notwithftanding the J| abilities and induftry of Stahl, Hoffman, Boerhaave, and Cullen, we may eafily venture to affert that no a general lyftem has yet been propofed which is not d liable to innumerable and unfurmountable objeftions. - Very great progrefs has indeed been made in explain- | ing the philofophy of the. human body,, from afeer- C I N E. taining by decifive experiment the influence of the cir- Modems, culating, the nervous, and the lymphatic fyftems in the animal economy. But every attempt hitherto made to eftablifh any general theory in medicinb, that is to conduit the cure of every difeafe on a few gene¬ ral principles, has equally deviated from truth with 71 thofe of Hippocrates and Galen ; and has equally tended to miflead thofe who have adopted it. Indeed we may with confidence venture to affert, that from the very nature of the fubjeit itfelf, medicine does not admit of fuch fimplicity. No one can deny that the human body confiits of a very great number of diffe¬ rent parts, both folids and fluids. It is, however, equally certain, that each of thefe is from many diffe¬ rent caufes liable to deviations from the found ftate. And although fome flight changes may take place without what can be called a morbid affeition, yet we well know, that every change taking place to a certain degree in any one part will neceffarily and unavoidably produce an affeftion of the whole. Hence we may without hefitation venture to affirm, that eve¬ ry general theory which can be propofed, attempting to explain the phenomena,- and conduft the cure of all difeafes on a few general principles, though for fome time it may have ftrenuous advocates, will yet in the end be found to be both ill-grounded and per¬ nicious. The art of medicine has been much more ufefully improved by careful attention to the hiftory, theory, and pra&iee of particular difeafes, and by endeavour¬ ing to afeertain from cautious obfervation the fymp- toms by which they are to be diftinguifhed, the caufes by which they are induced, and the means by which they are to be prevented, alleviated, or cured. On this footing, therefore, we (hall endeavour to give a brief account of at leaft the moft important affe&ions to which the human body is fubjefted, delivering what appear to: us to be the beft eftahliftied fadls and obfer- vations refpe&ing each. But before entering on the confideration of parti¬ cular difeafes, or what has commonly been ftyled the practice of medicine, it is neceffary to give a gene¬ ral view of the moft important fundtions of the animal ' body, and of the cljief morbid affedtions to which they are fubjected; a branch which has ufually been named - the ’Theory ox Injlitutions of Medicine. Theory of Medicine, or an Account of the principal Functions of the Animal Body. WHILE thefun&Ions of living animals, but par¬ ticularly of the human fpecies, are. very nume¬ rous, the accounts given of thefe both in a ftate of health and difeafe are very various. Without, therefore, pre¬ tending to enumerate the' cOntradidlory opinions of different authors,, we ftiall here prefent the reader with a view of this fubjedt, extradled from one of the lateft: and beft publications refpediing it, the Confpedus Me¬ dian a Theoretics of Dr James Gregory, formerly pro- feffor of the inftitutions-of medicine in the univerfity; of Edinburgh, and now profeffor of pradtice. In this work, which was firft publiflied in 178c, and. afterwards reprinted under an enlarged form in rySs, Dr Gregory introduces' his fubjedl by obfer-D'vUi. n of ■ ving, that fome fundtions of thehumanbody.relatethefunc- to itfelf only, and'others to external'things. To thetions’: t0 a" latter clafs belong thofe which by phyfioians are call- ™' ed the animal fvndions ; to- which are to be referred alltural, our fenfes, as well as the power of voluntary motion, by which We become acquainted'with the univerfe, and enjoy this earth. Among the fundtions* which relate to the body, only fome have been named ’vital, fuch as the circulation, of the blood and refpiration ; becaufe, without the conftant continuance of thefe life cannot fubfift. Others, intended for repairing the wafts of the fyftera, have been turned the natural func- twm - M E T) I tlons; for by the conflant attrition of the folids, and the evaporation of the fluid parts of the body, we ftand in need of nouriihment to fupply this walle ; after which the putrid and excrementitious parts muft be thrown out by the proper paffages. The digeftion of the food, fecretion of the humours, and excretion of the putrid parts of the food, are referred to this clafs ; which, though neceffary to life, may yet be interrupted for a confxderable time without danger. Diftin an^ when changed alfo changes it.—There are alfo remote caufes, which phyAcians have been ac- cuftomed to divide into the predifponent and exciting ones. The former are thofe which only render the 60 body At for a difeafe, or which put it into fuch a fxciting ftate that it will readily receive one. The exciting oufe. caufe is that which immediately produces the difeafe in-a body already difpofed to receive it. The predifponent caufe is always inherent in the body itfelf, though perhaps it originally came from without; but the exciting caufe may either come from within or from without. From the combined aftion of the predifponent and exciting caufes comes the proximate caufe, which nei- 61 ther of the two taken flngly is able to produce ; feeing Proximate neither every exciting caufe will produce a difeafe in <:aa e’ every perfon, nor will every one predifpofed to a difeafe fall into it without an exciting caufe.—A body predifpofed to difeafe therefore has already declined fomewhat from a ftate of perfeft health, although none of its functions are impeded in fuch a manner that we can truly fay the perfon is difeafed. Yet fometimes the predifponent caufe, by continuing long, may. arrive at fuch an height, that it alone, without the addition of any exciting caufe, may pro- N1* 202. CINE. Thefy, duce a real difeafe.—Of this we have examples in the- Orig if debility of the Ample folids, the mobility of the,ljllg;] living folids, and in plethora.—The exciting caufe ^" alfo, though it (hould not be able immediately to bring on a difeafe ; yet if it continues long, will by 1 ] degrees deftroy the ftrongeft conftitution, and render it liable to various difeafes ; becaufe it either pro- i I duces a predifponent caufe, or is converted into it, j |1 fo that the fame thing may fometimes be an exciting , j j caufe, fometimes a predifponent one; of which the inclemencies of the weather, lloth, luxury, &c. are examples. , J 1 Difeafes, however, feem undoubtedly to have their Herej; origin from the very conftitution of the animal ma-difeafe! ^ chine ; and hence many difeafes are common to every body when a proper exciting caufe occurs, though ] fome people are1 much more liable to certain difeafes ■; than others. Some are hereditary ; for as healthy pa- | rents naturally produce healthy children, fo difeafed parents as naturally produce a difeafed offspring. Some of thefe difeafes appear in the earlieft infancy ; others j occur equally at all ages; nor are there wanting fome j which lurk unfufpecfed, even to the lateft old age, at ’ laft breaking out with the utmoft violence on a proper | occaAon. Some difeafes are born with us, even though they have no proper foundation in our conftitution, as when a foetus receives feme hurt by an injury done to the mother; while others, neither born with us nor having any foundation in the conftitution, are fucked ; in with the nurfe’s milk. Many difeafes accompany Dlfea(fi the different ftages of life ; and hence fome are proper from ag to infancy, youth, and old age. Some alfo are proper and fex.; to each of the fexes : especially the weaker fex, pro¬ ceeding, no doubt, from the general conftitution of the body, but particularly from the ftate of the parts fub- ; j fervient to generation. Hence the difeafes peculiar to virgins, to menftruating women, to women with 1 child, to lying-in women, to nurfes, and tp old wo- ^ men. The climate itfelf, under which people live, Difealesl produces fome difeafes; and every climate hath a ten-fromdjj dency to produce a particular difeafe, either from its111*16, t excefs of heat or cold, or from the mutability of the weather. An immenfe number of difeafes alfo may be m produced by impure air, or fuch as is loaded with pu- j trid, marlhy, and other noxious vapours. The fame :■ thing may happen likewife from corrupted aliment, 1 whether meat or drink; though even the beft and moft ■ |S nutritious aliment will hurt if taken in too great quan- | tity ; not to mention poifons, which are endowed with j fuch pernicious qualities, that even when taken in a | very fmall quantity they produce the moft grievous j difeafes, or perhaps even death itfelf. Laftly, from gy : innumerable accidents and dangers to which mankind Difeafe*^ are expofed, they frequently come off with broken limbs, wounds, and contuAons, fometimes quite incu-Ci el ;| table ; and thefe misfortunes, though proceeding from an external caufe at flrft, often terminate in internal difeafes. Hitherto we have mentioned only the dangers which come from without; but thofe are not lefs, nor fewer j in number, which come from within. At every breath, man pours forth a deadly poifon both to himfelf and others. Neither are the effluvia of the lungs alone hurt- 9 ful: there flows out from every pore of the body a moft fubtile and poifonous matter, perhaps of a putre- fcent Theory, MED! Oriyi- <'l feent nature, which being long accumulated, and not IMfeafts. allowed to difFufe itfelf through the air, infedts the tu body with moft grievous difeafes ^ nor does it ftop here, but produces a contagion which fpreads devafta- tion far and wide among mankind. From too much or too little exercife of our animal-powers alfo no fmall danger enfues. By inadlivity either of body or mind, the vigour of both is impaired j nor is the dan¬ ger much lefs from too great employment. By mode¬ rate life, all the faculties of the mind, as well as all the parts of the body, are improved and ftrengthened ; and here nature has appointed certain limits, fo that exercife can neither be too much neglefted, nor too much increafed, with impunity. Hence thofe who ufe violent exercife, as well as thofe who fpend their time in doth and idlenefs, are equally liable to difeafes; but each to difeafes of a different kind : and hence alfo thft bad efFefts of too great or too little employment of the 56 mental powers. a-fcs Befides the dangers arifing from thofe actions of the iconsofthe body and mind which are in our own power, there are uinuud. others arifing from thofe which are quite involuntary. Thus, pafiions of the mind, either when carried to too great excefs, or when long continued, equally deftroy I the health j nay, will even fometimes bring on fudden death. Sleep alfo, which is of the greateft fervice in reftoring the exhaufled flrength of the body, proves noxious either by its too great or too little quantity. In the moft healthy body, alfo, many things always require to be evacuated. The retention of thefe is hurtful, as well as too profufe anevacution, or the ex¬ cretion of thofe things either fpontaneoufty or artifi¬ cially which nature directs to be retained. As the folid parts fometimes become flabby, foft, almeft dif- -folved, and unfit for their proper offices; fo the fluids are fometimes infpiflated, and formed even into the hardeft folid mafles. Hence impeded actions of the organs, vehement pain, various and grievous difeafes. JLaftly, feme animals are to be reckoned among the caufes of difeafes: namely, fuch as fupport their life at the expence of others: and thefe either invade us from without, or take up their refidence within I _ the body, gnawing the bowels while the perfon is yet alive, not only with great danger and diftrefs to the patient, but fometimes even producing death M «7 itfelf. mPts vtcdica- Man, however, is not left without defence againft "*tura‘ fo many and fo great dangers. The human body is pof- feffed of a moft wonderful power, by which it preferves itfelf from difeafes, keeps oft" mar*, and in a very ftiort time cures fome already begun, while others are by the fame means more flowiy brought to a happy con- I clufion. This power, called the antocrateia, or vis me- dicatrix naUira-, 'is well known both to phylicians and philofophers, by wffiom it is moft juftly celebrated ; this alone is fufficient for curing many difeafes, and is of fervice in all. Nay, even the beft medicines ope¬ rate only by exciting and properly dire&ing.this force} for no medicine will a growth, ftate, decreafe of the body; its rigidity Qualitietl J ■daily increafing; and at laft the unavoidable death of the I incident to old age from a continuance of the fame mal So“cl*T;ilT caufes. * 'i" 1 Perhaps the different denfity of the folids is in fome meafure owing to Nature herfelf; but it feems rather to depend more on the powers of exercife or inadlivity in changing the ftate of the folids, the effedts of which on the body, whether good or bad, may hence be ea- fily underftood. Heat relaxes and expands all bodies, but cold ren¬ ders them more denfe and hard ; the effedts of which on the human body are well known to moft people. Though the body is found to preferve a certain de- „ ||.] j gree of heat almoft in every fituation, it is impoflible but that its furface muff be affedted by the tempera¬ ture of the ambient atmofphere; and we have hot the leaft reafon to doubt that every part of the body may thus feel the effedts of that temperature. What a dif¬ ference is there between one who, expofed to the fouth- wind, becomes lazy and languid, fcarce able to drag along his limbs; and one who feels the force of the cold north-wind, which renders the whole body alert, ftrong, and fit for adtion ? That thefe various caufes, each of which is capable of affedting the conftitution of the body when take# fingly, will produce much greater effedts when com- binedr is fufficiently evident. The experiments of . j Bryan Robinfon, the effedts of the warm bath, and in¬ deed daily experience, ftiow it fully. It is not yet certainly known what is the ultimate ftrudture of the minuteft parts of the animal-folid % whether it confifts of ftraight fibres or threads, whofe length is very confiderable in proportion to their breadth, varioufly interwoven with one another, as Boerhaave fuppofes ; or of fpiral ones, admirably con¬ voluted and interwoven with one another, as fome mi- crofcopical experiments feem to ftiow ; or whether the cellular texture be formed of fibres and lamina, and from thence the greateft part of the body, as the ce¬ lebrated Haller hath endeavoured to prove. The cellular texture is obferved throughout the 0ej|uiar I whole body: it furrounds and connedts the fibres texture- 1 themfelves, which are fufficiently apparent in many of the organs; and flightly joins the different parts which ought to have any kind of motion upon the neighbour¬ ing ones. By a condenfation of the fame fubftance alfo, the ftrongeft, and what feem the thinneft, mem¬ branes are formed; the moft fimple of which, being accurately examined, difeover the cellular ftrudture.. This cellular fubftance fometimes increafes to a furprr* fing degree, and cdl parts formed of it, membranes, veflels, &c. efpecially by a gentle diftenfion ; for % fudden and violent diftenlion either breaks it altoge¬ ther, or renders it thinner. Sometimes alfo it grows between neighbouring parts, and joins thofe which na¬ ture has left free. Preternatural concretions of this kind are often obferved after an inflammation of the lungs or of the abdominal vifeera; and thefe new membranes are found to be truly cellular. This fub¬ ftance, when cut, or by any other means di vided, grows together of its own accord ; but if, by reafon of very great inflammation and fuppurat:on, a large portion of the cellular texture has been deftroyed, it is never again renewed, and an. ugly fear is left. It,is even- Theory. M E D I Cellular fald, that this fubflanee, in certain cafes, is capable '^Texture. 0f joining the parts either of the fame body with one another, or of a foreign body with them ; and upon this, if on any foundation, refts the art of Taliacotius and that of tranfplanting teeth, lately fo much talk- ^ ed of. The cellular texture is in fome places merely a kind of net-work, In others filled w ith fat. Wherever too great bulk or compreffion would have been inconve¬ nient or dangerous, as in the head, lungs, eyes, eye- I brows, penis, fcrotum, &c. there it coUefts no fat, but is lax, and purely reticulated; but between the mufcles of the body and limbs below the Ikin, in the abdomen, efpecially in the omentum and about the kidneys, very much fat is fecreted and colle&ed. Animal fat. The fat is a pure animal oil, not very different from the expreffed and mild vegetable ones ; during life it is fluid, but of different degrees of thicknefs in dif¬ ferent parts of the body. It is fecreted from the blood, and is often fuddenly reabforbed into it, though pure oil is very rarely obferved in the blood. It is indeed very probable, that oil, by digeflion, partly in the primjE vise, and partly in the lungs, is converted into gluten, and this again into oil by means of feeretion ; though no organs fecreting the fat can be fhown by anatomifts. It is, however, probable, that there are fuch organs ; and that the cellular texture has fome peculiar ftrufture in thofe parts which are deftined to contain the fat already fecreted, without fuffering it to pafs into other places; for it never pafles into thefe parts which are purely reticulated, although the cel¬ lular texture is eafily permeable by air or water over the whole body from head to foot. The fat is augmented by .the ufe of much animal- food, or of any other that is oily and nourifhing, pro¬ vided the digeftion be good; by the ufe of flrong drink, efpecially malt-liquor; by much reft of body and mind, much fleep and inactivity, caftration, cold, repeated bloodletting, and in general by whatever di- minifhes the vital and animal powers. Much, how¬ ever, depends on the conftitution of the body itfelf; nor is it pofiible to fatten a human creature at pleafure like an ox. A certain degree of fatnefs, according to the age of the perfon, is a fign and effeft of good health ; but when too great, it becomes a difeafe of itfelf, and the caufe of other difeafes. It may al¬ ways be very certainly removed by ftrong exercife, little fleep, and a fpare and folid diet. The fat al¬ ways makes up a confiderable part of the bulk of the body, and very often by far the greateft part. Its ufe feems to be to make the motion of the body more eafy and free by leffening the friCtion of the moving parts, and thus preventing the abrafion of the folids, which would otherwife happen. It is alfo of ufe to hinder the parts from growing together, which fometimes happens, when by an ulcer or any other accident a part of the cellular texture containing the fat is de- ftroyed. Befides all this, the fat contributes not a little to the beauty of the body, by filling up the large interftices between the mufcles, which would -otherwife give the perfon a deformed and Stocking ap¬ pearance. It is thought to be nutritious, when ab- forbed from its cells by the blood; but of this we have no great certainty. It feems to have feme power C I N E; 75 of defending from the cold, fteing nature has beftow- Animal ed it in very great quantity on thofe animals which in- Fat' . habit the colder regions. Thofe parts of the body which enjoy fenfe and mo-Vital fo- bility, are called living or vital folids. They are the hd*. brain, cerebellum, medulla oblongata, fpinal marrow, the nerves ariflng from thefc and diffufed throughout the whole body, and which are diftributed through tire various organs of fenfe and through the mufcles, and laftly the mufcles themfelves. Senfation is much more general than mobility, as being common to all the parts already mentioned. Mobility is proper to the nrufcular fibres alone : wherever there is fenfation, therefore, we may believe that there are nerves; and wherever there is mobility, we may believe that muf- cular fibres exift. Nay, even mobility itfelf feems to originate from the comre&ion which the mufcles have with the nerves; for foon after the nerves are com- prefled, or tied, or cut, the mufcles to which they are diftributed lofe their faculties; which happens, too, when the brain itfelf, or the origin of the nerves, is affe&ed. Some reckon that the mufcles are produced from the nerves, and confift of the fame kind of mat¬ ter. Both indeed have a fimilar fthnfture, as being fibrous and of a white colour: for the mufcles when well freed from the blood, of which they contain a great abundance, are of this colour as well as the nerves; nei¬ ther can the nervous fibres by any means be diftin- guifhed from the mufcular fibres themfelves. Both have alfo fenfation ; and both ftimulants and fedatives ail in the fame manner, whether they be applied to the mufcles themfelves or to the nerves. It is difficult for us to difeover the origin of many parts of the body, or to afeertain whether they are produced all at the fame time or one after another : yet it muft be owned, that many of the mufcular parts, are obferved to have attained a remarkable degree of ftrength, while the brain is ftill foft and almoft fluid ; and that the action of thefe mufcular parts is required for the adfion and growth of the brain. The nuifcles are alfo of a much firmer contexture than the nerves; and enjoy a power of their own, namely, that of irri¬ tability, of which the nerves never participate. Of ne- ceflity, therefore, either the mufcles muft be conftruc- ted of fome kind of matter different from that of the nerves ; or if both are made of the fame materials, their organization muff be exceedingly different. But if the fubftance of the mufdes and nerves be totally dif¬ ferent, we may eafily be convinced that much of the one is always mixed with the other; for it is impof- fible to prick a mufcle even with the fmalleft needle, without wounding or lacerating many nervous fibres at the fame time. Since, therefore, there is fuch a clofe conne&ion between the mufcles and nerves both as to their fun&ions and ilru&ure, they are defer- vedly reckoned by phyfiologifts to be parts of the fame genus, called the genus nervofum, or nervous fxftem. After treating of fenfe in general, Dr Gregory senrltf proceeds to confider particularly each of the fenfes feeling. both external and internal. He begins with the fenfe of feeling, as being the moft Ample, and at the fame time in common to every part of the ner¬ vous fyftem. In fome places, however, it is much more acitfe than in others; iij the ikin, for in- £ 2 ftance. 76 M E D I Externa] ftanee, and efpeclally In the points of the fingers. , Senfe^ Thefe are' reckoned to have nervous papilLe, which v by the influx of the blood are fomewhat erefted in. the aftion of contact, in order to give a more acute fenfation ; though indeed this opinion feems rather to be founded on a conjefture derived from the ftrufture of the tongue, which is not only the organ of tafte, but alfo a moft delicate organ of touch, than upon any certain obfervations. Tain- From the fenfe of feeling, as well as all the othei fenfes, either pain or pleafure may arife; nay, to this fenfe we commonly refer both pain and almoft all other trouble- fhme fenfations, tho’ in truth pain may arife from every vehement fenfation. It is brought on by any great force applied to the fentient part; whether this force comes from within or from without. Whatever, therefore, pricks, cuts, lacerates, diftends, compreffes, bruifes, ftrikes, gnaws, burns, or in any manner of way ftimulates, may create pain. Hence it is fo fre¬ quently conjoined with fo many difeafes, and is often more intolerable even than the difeafe itfelf. A mo¬ derate degree of pain ilimulates the affe&ed part, and by degrees the whole body; produces a greater flux of blood and nervous power to the part affe&ed; and of¬ ten ftimulates to fuch motions as are both neceflary and healthful. Hence, pain is fometimes to be rec¬ koned among thofe thi ngs which guard our life. When very violent, however, it produces too great irritation, inflammation and its confequences, fever, and all thofe evils which flow from too great force of the circula¬ tion ; it diforders the whole nervous fyftem, and pro¬ duces fpafms, watching, convulfions, delirium, debi¬ lity, and fainting. Neither the mind nor body can long bear very vehement pain; and indeed Nature has appointed certain limits, beyond which