Present t't) in i mm. ♦ Cncpclopaetita Brttanntta OR, A DICTIONARY OF ARTS, SCIENCES, AND MISCELLANEOUS LITERATURE; ENLARGED AND IMPROVED. THE FIFTH EDITION, jdustcateti toiti) nearlg sir tjuntireti Cngrabings. VOL. xx. INDOCTI DISCANT; AMENT MEMINISSE PER1TI. EDINBURGH : Printed at the Encyclopedia Press, FOR ARCHIBALD CONSTABLE AND COMPANY, AND THOMSON BONAR, EDINBURGH GALE, CURTIS, AND FENNER, LONDON ; AND THOMAS WILSON AND SONS, YORK. 1815. ♦ ♦ TTJAfton - eiiGa^Ajja3eiM q^a t8aDT^aiD8 ,8Ti ;3 ' Ln / a3TIJ .c:iVO' n,. < 7 ( . . ,y<\ .jo; • i eiKi;;.iM ...a:./ • <. r-t. n . Encyclopedia Britannica. Suicide. i Suicide among the Jews. a Among the Greeks. 3 The Bra- mins and Gentoos. S U I SUICIDE, the crime of felf-murder, or the perfon •who commits it. We have often wifhed to fee a hiftory of crimes drawn up by a man of ability and refearch. In this hiftory we would propofe that the author fliould defcribe the crimes peculiar to different nations in the different ftages of fo- ciety, and the changes which they undergo in the pro- grefs of civilization. After having arranged the hifto- rical fafts, he might, by comparing them with the re- ligifin and the knowledge of the people, deduce fome im¬ portant general conclufions, which would lead to a dif- covery of the caufe of crimes, and of the remedy moft proper to be applied. Some crimes are peculiar to cer¬ tain ftages of fociety, fome to certain nations, &c. Suicide is one of thofe crimes which we are led to be¬ lieve not common among favage nations. The firft in- ftances of it recorded in the Jewifh hiftory are thofe of Saul and Ahitophel 5 for we do not think the death of Samfon a proper example. We have no reafon to fup- pofe that it became common among the Jews till their wars with the Romans, when multitudes flaughtered themfelves that they might not fall alive into the hands of their enemies. But at this period the Jews were a moft defperate and abandoned race of men, had corrupt¬ ed the religion of their fathers, and rejedled that pure fyftem which their promifed Mefliah came to Jerufalem to announce. When it became remarkable among the Greeks, w’e have not been able to difcover j but it was forbidden by Pythagoras, as we learn from Athenseus, by Socrates and Ariftotle, and by the Theban and Athenian laws. In the earlieft ages of the Roman republic it was feldom committed but when luxury and the Epicurean and Stoical philofophy had corrupted the fimplicity and vir¬ tue of the Roman chara£ler ; then they began to feek fhelter in fuicide from their misfortunes or the effe&s of their own vices. The religious principles of the bramins of India led them to admire fuicide on particular occafions as honour¬ able. Accuftomed to abftinence, mortification, and the contempt of death, they confidered it as a mark of weaknefs of mind to fubmit to the infirmities of old age. We are informed that the modern Gentoos, who ftill in moft things conform to the cuftoms of their anceftors, when old and infirm, are frequently brought to the banks of rivers, particularly to thofe of the Ganges, that they may die in its faered ftreams, which thev believe Vol.'XX. Parti. S U I can wafli away the guilt of their fins. But the maxims, Smndc. ^ of the bramins, which have encouraged this pra&ice, we Sunilon,~ are affured by Mr Hoi well, are a corruption of the ?hn Rha^ do&rines of the Shaftah, which pofitively forbid fuicide vol. ii. under the fevereft puniftunent. The praflice which Hoi™ell's religion or affeftion has eftabliftied among the Gentoos, for women at the deatli of their hulhands to burn them- acc< ^ ^ felves alive on the funeral pile, we do not think ought to be confidered as fuicide, as we are not anxious to ex¬ tend the meaning of the wrord j for were we to extend it thus far, it would be as proper to apply it to thofe who cboofe rather to die in battle than make their ef- cape at the expence of their honour. Ihus we fhould condemn as fuicides the brave Spartans who died at Thermopylae in defence of their country j we ftiould al- fo be obliged to apply the fame difgraceful epithet to all thofe well-meaning but weak-minded Chriftians in this ifland, who in the laft century chofe rather to die as mar¬ tyrs than comply with commands which were not mo¬ rally w'rong. According to the Gentoo laws, “ it is proper for a woman after her hulband’s death to bum herfelf in the fire with his corpfe. Every woman who thus burns lhall remain in paradife with her hufband three crore and fifty lacks of years. If ftie cannot, (lie muft in that cafe preferve an inviolable ckaftity. If Ihe remain chafte, fhe goes to paradife 5 and if ihe do not preferve her chaftity, ihe goes to hell.” 4 A cuftom ftmilar to this prevailed among many na-Amon.S tions on the continent of America. When a chief died, fioj,ertj'on'>J a certain number of his wives, of his favourites, and of America. his flaves, were put to death, and interred together with him, that he might appear with the fame dignity in his future ftation, and be waited upon by the fame atten¬ dants. This perfuafion is fo deeply rooted, that many of their retainers offer themfelves as vi£lims j and the fame cuftum prevails in many of the negro nations in Africa. 5 If we can believe the hiftorians of Japan, voluntary Japa> death is common in that empire. The devotees of the116*®’ anc‘ idol Amida drown themfelves in his prefence, attended by their relations and friends, and feveral of the pritfts, who all confider the devoted perfon as a faint who isRaynal't gone to everlafting happinefs. Such being the fuppofed honours appropriated to a voluntary death, it is not prifing that the Japanefe anxioufly eheriih a contempt of^,-^, voi, i. life. Accordingly it is a part of the education of their children u to repeat poems in which the virtues of their A anceflor 6 Scythians, , 7 and Scan¬ dinavians. S U I l 2 Suicide, anceftors are celebrated, an utter contempt of life is inculcated, and fuicide is fet up as the moft heroic of aftions.” A notion feems alfo to have prevailed among the an¬ cient Scythian tribes, that it was pufillanirnous and ig¬ noble for a man whofe ftrength was wafted with difeafe or infirmity, fo as to be ufelefs to the community, to continue to live. It was reckoned an heroic aflion vo¬ luntarily to feek that death which he had not the good fortune to meet in the field of battle. Perverfion of moral feeling does not fpring up, we hope, fpontane- oufly in any nation, but is produced by fome peculiari¬ ties of fituation. A wandering people like the Scythi¬ ans, who roamed about from place to place, might of¬ ten find it impoflible to attend the fick, or to fupply from their precarious ftore the wants of the aged and infirm. The aged and infirm themfelves, no longer able to fup- port the chara£l:e.r of warriors, would find themfelves unhappy. In this way the pra&iee of putting to death fuch perfons as were ufelefs to the community might originate, and afterwards be inculcated as honourable j but he who put an end to his infirmities by his own hand, obtained a chara&er ftill more illuftrious. The tribes of Scandinavia, which worlhipped Odin the “ father of {laughter,” were taught, that dying in the field of battle was the moft glorious event that could befal them. This was a maxim fuited to a warlike na¬ tion. In order to eftablilh it more firmly in the mind, all were excluded from Odin’s feaft of heroes who died a natural death. In Afgardia flood the hall of Odin ; where,'feated on a throne, he received the fouls of his departed heroes. This place was called Valhalla, fig- bifying “ the hall of thofe who died by violence.” Na¬ tural death being thus deemed inglorious, and punilhed with exclufion from Valhalla the paradife of Odin, he who could not enjoy death in the field of battle was led to feek it by bis own hands when ficknefs or old age be¬ gan to aflail him. In fuch a nation fuicide muft have been very common. As fuicide prevailed much in the decline of the Ro¬ man empire, when luxury, licentioufnefs, profligacy, and falfe philofophy, pervaded the -world, fo it conti¬ nued to prevail even after Chriftianity was eftablifhed. The Romans, when they became converts to Chriftiani¬ ty, did not renounce their ancient prejudices and falfe opinions, but blended them with the new religion which they embraced. The Gothic nations alfo, who fubvert- ed the Roman empire, while -they received the Chrif- tian religion, adhered to many of their former opinions and manners. Among other criminal practices which were retained by the Romans and their conquerors, that of fuieide was one ; but the principles from which it proceeded were explained, fo as to appear more agree¬ able to the new fyftem which they had efpoufed. It was committed, either to fecure from the danger of apoftafy, to procure the honour of martyrdom, or to preferve the crown of virginity. When we defcend to modern times, we lament to find fo many inftances of fuicide among the moft polifh- ed nations, who have the beft opportunities of knowing the atrocity of that unnatural crime. The Englifh have long been reproached by foreigners for the frequent com million of it •, and the “ gloomy month of Novem¬ ber” has been ftigrnatized as the feafon when it is moft common. ' But this difgraceful imputation, -we think, 8 It prevail¬ ed much in the decline of the Ro¬ man em¬ pire. 9 Too com¬ mon in mo¬ dern times, but not more fo in England than in o- ther coun- tri.es. ] S U I may be juftly attributed, not to the greater frequency Suicide, of the crime in England than in other places, but to the 1 V / cuftom of publifhing in the newfpapers every inftance of fuicide which is known. Mr Moore, who lately publifhed a full inquiry into this fubjeft, was at great pains to obtain accurate information concerning the per¬ petration of this crime in different countries. Mercier, Mercier's who wrote in 1782, fays, that the annual number of Tableau de filicides in Paris was then about 150. He does not tell Parls' us how he came by the information ; but we have the xiie num- authority of the Abbe Fontana for afferting, that more her of fui- perfons put an end to their lives in Paris than in Lon-cj^es in f’a- don. The Abbe had this information from the lieute- nant of the police. Mr Moore was informed by one neVa of the principal magiftrates of Geneva, that in that ci- according ty, which contains about 25,000 inhabitants, the ave-1° the heft rage number of filicides is about eight. The averageaccounts* number of filicides, from what caufe foever, for the laft 28 years, has been 3 2 each year for London, South¬ wark, and Weftminfter. In Edinburgh, which con¬ tains 80,000 inhabitants, we are convinced the average number of filicides does not exceed four. Mr Moore found, from the accounts with which he was favoured by the feveral coroners of the county of Kent, that for the laft 18 years the number has been upwards of 32 each year. Kent is fuppofed to contain 200,000 inha¬ bitants, and London 800,000. It is eafy therefore to fee, that in the metropolis many inftances of filicide muft occur which are never the fubjeft of legal inquiry, and confequently never made known to the world. Whereas in the country towns and villages of Kent it is fcarcely poflible to conceal fuch an a&ion as felf-murder from the knowledge of the whole neighbourhood. The calculation therefore refpefling Kent we may receive as true, while we muft increafe the average number in London very confiderably. Mr Moore computes the average number of filicides in England every year at a thoufand j but the principles on which he founds this opinion are fo imperfedt and vague, that we do not think it can be depended on as coming near the truth. „ It might lead to fome interefting conclufions to com- In what pare together, not only the number of filicides in differ-rank an committed. Mercier fays, that at Paris it was the lower mon. ranks who were moft commonly guilty of it j that it was moftly committed in garrets or hired lodgings; and that it proceeded from poverty and oppreffion. A great ma¬ ny, he fays, wrote letters to the magiftrates before their death. Mr Moore’s correfpondent from Geneva inform- Moore's ed him, that from the year 1777 to 1787 more than 100 Full In- fiiicides were committed in Geneva 5 that two-thirds into thefe unfortunate perfons were men ; that few7 of the cle- rical order have been known to commit it ; and that it is not fo much the end of an immoral, irreligious, difR- ^ pated life, as the effeft of melancholy and poverty. By the information obtained from the coroners of Kent, it appears, that of the 32, three-fourths have deftroyed themfelves by hanging 5 that the proportion of males to females has been about two-thirds of the former \ that no one feafon of the year is more diftinguifbed for this crime than another ; and that filicide is upon the in- ereafe. Our accounts refpe&ing the city of London are very imperfeft; but we think ourfelves intitled to con¬ clude, that filicide is more common among the great and wealthy S U I [ 3 1 S U I Suicide. phyficat caufes to which it has been afcribed ia Britain. 13 And moral caufes. 14 Not owing always to knfanity, Wealthy than among the lower ranks, and that It is ufu- ally the efFeft of gaming and diffipation. Thofe who have inquired into the caufes of fuicide in Britain have enumerated many pbyfical as well as moral caufes. They have afcribed it to the variablenefs of our climate, to the great ufe of animal food, to ftrong fpiri- tuous liquors, to tea, and to the fulphureous exhalations of the pit coal ufed as fuel, which are faid to produce a depreffion of fpirits and nervous affections. Of our cli¬ mate, we have no caufe to complain, nor have we any r^ifon to impute any of our vices to its influence. There are many climates much more unfavourable where fui¬ cide is fcarcely known. That an exceflive quantity of grofs animal food, or of ftrong liquors, or of tea, will powerfully affe.Ct the human conftitution, we will not deny : but before we confider thefe as caufes, it muft firft be determined, whether thofe who are guilty of felf-mur- der be much addicted to them; and if they are, whether there be not other caufes much more violent in their na¬ ture which have operated on their mind } for we ought not rafhly to attribute vicious effeCts to any of thofe things which feem to have been created on purpofe for the comfort or convenience of man. We are rather fur- prifed to find that coal is mentioned even as a diftant caufe of fuicide •, for it is one of the bleflings of our ifland y and a good coal fire we have always found rather conducive to good fpirits than injurious to them. Among the moral caufes which are fuppofed to co¬ operate in producing fuicide in Britain, the freedom of our conftitution and laws is reckoned one. That rational liberty ftiould have any tendency to encourage crimes of any kind, a Chriftian philofopher can never allow ; for fuch an opinion is totally difcountenanced by enlighten¬ ed views of nature. Mercier has afcribed the frequency of fuicide in Paris to the oppreflion of the late govern¬ ment. Now it appears fomewhat extraordinary, that fuicide in one country fhould be occafioned by liberty, and in another by the want of it. One of thefe opi¬ nions muft be falfe, and it is furely not difficult to diftin- guilli which. Humanity would in moft cafes difpofe us to conclude, that fuicide is the effect of infanity, were there not fo many inftances of cool deliberate felf-murder. That fui¬ cide is an unnatural crime, which none but a madman would commit, compaffion indeed may fuppofe j but the Suicide. murder of a wife, a father, or a child, are' alfo unnatu- ' i 11•"* ral ; yet compaffion does not teach us in all cafes to a- fcribe fuch a crime to madnefs. Paffion may often arife to fuch a height of outrage as to be fcarcely diftinguith- able from madnefs in its fymptoms and its effects ; yet we always make a diftindtion between that madnefs which arifes from difeafe and that which is owing to a violent perturbation of mind. If a perfon be capable of managing his wordly affairs, of making a will, and of. difpofing of his property, immediately before his death, or after he formed the refolution of dying by his own hands, fuch a man is not to be confidered as infane. j- But though a regard for truth prevents us from aferib* but often ing fuicide in all cafes to infanity, we muft aferibe it ei- t0 ther to infanity or to vicious paffion. Thefe two divi-^W0115 Pa * Irons, we imagine, will comprehend every fpecies of it, whether arifing from melancholy, tcedium vita or ennui, difappointment in fchemes of ambition or love, pride, gaming, or a defire to avoid the ftiame of a public exe¬ cution j paffions which are often increafed by falfe views of God, of man, and of a future ftate, arilingfrom deifru and infidelity. If thefe be the caufes of fuicide in mo¬ dern time, what a difgraceful -^contraft do they form to thofe principles which afluated many of the ancient phi- lofophers, the Gentoos, the Japanefe, and the worfhip- pers of Odin? When they committed fuicide, they com¬ mitted it from principle, from a belief of its lawfulnefs, and the hope of being rewarded for what they judged an honourable facrifice. But in modern times, we are forry to fay, when it is not the effedt of madnefs, it is the effeiff of vice : and when it is the effedt of vice, it proves that the vicious paffions are then indulged to the higheft degree ; for there is no crime which a man can commit that is fo ftrong a fymptom of the violence of particular paffions. It is from not attending to this cir- cumftance, that it has been found fo difficult to refute the arguments in favour of fuicide. If the criminality of fuicide be confined merely to the violent adtion, many apologies may be made for it ; but if it be confidered folely as the effedt of vice, as the ftrongeft fymptom of ungoverned paffion, he who undertakes its defence muft; undertake the defence of what all men will loudly con¬ demn (a). A 2 It (a) Several of the heathens entertained a very juft fenfe of the atrocity of fuicide. Quintus Curtius introduces Darius with the following fpeech, when he had loft his empire : “ I wait (fays the unfortunate monarch) the iffue of my fate : you wonder, perhaps, that I do not terminate my own life j but I choofe rather to die by the crime of another than by my own. We cannot refufe ourfelves the pleafure of prefenting to our readers the following beautiful paffage upon this fubjedt from Fitzofborne’s letters * : “ I am perfuaded (fays this elegant writer) this difguft of life is frequently *Lettel indulged out of a principle of mere vanity. It is efteeraed as a mark of uncommon refinement, and as placing aiv. man above the ordinary level of his fpecies, to feem fuperior to the vulgar feelings of happinefs. True good fenfe, however, moft certainly confifts not in defpifing, but in managing our ftock of life to the beft advantage, as a cheerful acquiefcence in the meafures of Providence is one of the ftrongeft fymptoms of a well-conftituted mind. Self-wearinefs is a circumftance that ever attends folly) and to condemn our being is the greateft, and indeed the peculiar infirmity, of human nature. It is a noble fentiment which Tully puts into the mouth of Cato, in his Treatife upon old Age; Non lubet mihi (fays that venerable Roman) deplorare vitam, quod multi, ct 11 doEli, Jape fecerunt; neque me vixijfe pcenitet: quoniam ita vixi, ut non frujlra me natum exijlimetn. “ It is in the power, indeed, of but a very fmall portion of mankind to adt the fame glorious part that afforded fuch high fatisfadiion to this diftinguiftied patriot; but the number is yet far more inconfiderable of thofe who cannot, in any ftation, fecure themfelves a fufficient fund of complacency to render life juftly valuable. Who is it that is placed out of the reach of the higheft: of all gratifications, thofe of the generous affedtions, and that cannot provide fat S U I [ 4 ] S U 1 Suicide. It is unneccfiary then to enter particularly into the arguments of thofe cafuifts who have undertaken the de- Unnecei fpicable otfice of advocates for the crime of fuicide. luytoen Their talents might furely have been employed more ter into the ufefully to the world, and more honourably to them- arguments f(,|v-eSj than in pleading for a crime, which, if it were committed by every man to whom their principles would make it lawful, would totally deftroyfome of thenobleft virtues, fortitude, patience, and refignation ) nay, would deftroy fociety itfelf, and teach us to defpife the opinion that this world is a date of preparation for another. “ I came into life without my own confent, and may I not of cafuifts upon this fubject. quit it at pleafure ?” (fay the advocates for fuicide). If, becaufe. we came into life without our own confent, we might quit it at pleafure, why may we not fpend our life alfo as we pleafe ? Why may we not rob and murder, and commit every kind of crime, if mere inclination is to be the rule of aftion ! Thus upon the principles of fuicide the highwayman and murderer may reafon, and every man may find a fafficient apology for any crime which he is tempted to commit. Or this abfurdity may be othervvife anfwered: As we came into life without qur own confent, we muff have come with the confent of fome other being ; and logic fays, that with the con- fent of that Being only can we lawfully quit it. Its great It is fufficient Ihortly to fay, that fuicide is contrary criminality to the ftrongeft principle of the human confiitution, felf- dence^H1' prefervation ; that it is rebellion againft God ; that it is cruelty to the feelings and reputation, and often takes away the fubfiftence of a wife, a child, or a father ; that it proves a want of fortitude to brave misfortunes ; that it delivers only from imagined to plunge into real evils. We may add, that almoft every inftance of fuicide of which we have heard was rafti, imprudent, and prema¬ ture, interrupted a ufeful life, or prevented a more ho¬ nourable death. Had Cato’s pride permitted him to yield himfelf to the generofity of Caefar, his charafler and his influence might have contributed to retard the flavery of his country, which his death tended to haftem Had Brutus and CafTius not executed the fatal refolu- tion which they had formed, of dying by their own hands in cafe of misfortune, the battle of Philippi might have had a very different iffue. Had Hannibal furren- dered himfelf to the Romans, inflead of fwallowing pot- fon, he would have gained more glory in braving their tortures than he won in the battle of Cannae j for to die innocently and heroically is the greateft exertion of hu- znan fortitude. As fuicide was deemed a crime by the mod: illuftri- ous and virtuous of the Greek and Roman philofophers, Suicide, it was confidered as a crime by the laws, and treated —v——1 with ignominy. By the law of Thebes filicides were H,)WlSr to have no honours paid to their memory *. The At he- nifnerfby nian law ordained the hand which committed the deed the Greeks,, to be cut off, and burnt apart from the reft of the body. ('e?nS &c* The body was not buried with the ufual folemnities, but was ignominioufly thrown into fome pit. In Cea in ™ ‘ and Maffilia (the ancient Marfeilies'), it was confidered Atticas, as a crime againft the ftate; and it was therefore necef-p- 523. fary for thofe who wifhed to deftroy themfelves to obtahi permifiion from the magiftrates. f Plutarch acquaints f Plutarch us, that an unaccountable paffion for filicide feized the w the Vir. Milefian virgins; from indulging which they could nottlies be prevented by the tears and entreaties of parents and. men‘ friends: but what perfuafion and entreaty could not effeft was accomplifhed by very different means. A decree was iffued, “ that the body of every young woman who hanged herfelf fliould be dragged naked through the ftreets by the fame rope with which ftie had committed the deed.” This wife edi£t put a complete flop to the extraordinary frenzy, and fuicide was no longer com¬ mitted by the virgins of Miletus. I5) In the early part of the Roman hiftory there feems to By the Re- have been feldom occafion for framing any laws againft mans, filicide. The only inftance recorded occurs in the reign of Tarquinius Prifcus. The foldiers who were appoint¬ ed to make drains and common fewers, thinking them¬ felves difgraced by fuch fervile offices, put tbemfelves to death in great numbers. The king ordered the bodies of all the felf-murderers to be expofed on crofies, and this put an effie£lual flop to the praftice. It is doubtful whether there was any ftanding law againft fuicide dur¬ ing the exiftence of the republic ; but during the reign of the emperors it was thought proper to lay it under certain regulations, though not abfolutely to condemn it as a crime. In Juftinian’s Digefts there is a law, by Lib. xlviiL which it was enafted, “ that if perfons accufed, or who Tit. xxi. had been found guilty, of any crime, fliould make away l’ar* 3* with themfelves, their effiefts fhould be confifeated.” But this punifhment only took place when confifcation of goods happened to be the penalty appointed by the law for the crime of which the felf-murderer was accu¬ fed or found guilty, and was not inflifted for filicide committed in any other cireumftances. When the Chriftian church had extended its jurif- ArdT'- diftion in the Roman empire, it was decreed in the fixth Chriftians. century, that no commemoration fhould be made in the eucharift for fuch asdeftroyed themfelves: neither ftiould their for his own happinefs, by contributing fomething to the welfare of others ? As this difeafe of the mind generally breaks out with the mofi violence in thofe who are fuppofed to be endowed with a greater delicacy of tafte and reafon than is the ufual allotment of their fellow creatures, one may afk them,*1 whether there is any/atiety in the purfuits of ufeful knowledge ? or,, if one can ever be weary of benefiting mankind ? Will not the fine arts fupply a lafting feaft to the mind ; or, can there be wanting a pleafureable enjoyment, fo long as there remains even one advantageous truth to be difeovered or confirmed ? To complain that life has no joys, while there is a fingle crea¬ ture whom we can relieve by our bounty, affift by our counfels, or enliven by our prefence, is to lament the lofs of that which we poffiefs, and is juft as rational as to die for thirft with the cup in our hands.. But the misfortune is, when a man is fettled into a habit of receiving all his pleafures from the mere felfifh indulgences, he wears e.ut of his mind the reliftl of every nobler enjoyment,, at the fame time that his powers of the fenfual kind are growing more languid by each repetition. It is no wonder, therefore, he ftiould fill up the meafure of his grati¬ fications long before he has completed the circle of his duration ; and either wretchedly fit down, the remainder cf bjs days in, difqontent, or raflily throw them up in defpair.” 4, $ De Legi- itus et Con- fuetudini- bus Anglia, Lib. iii. Traft. II. 21 Difficult to devifea pu- niflmient that would be an effec¬ tual pre¬ ventive. S U I [5 their bodies be carried out to burial will) pfalms nor have the ufual fervice fa id over them. Ibis ecclelialti- cal law continued till the reformation, when it was admitted into the ftatute code of England by the au¬ thority of parliament. As an additional punilhment, however, confifcation of land and goods feems to have been adopted from the Danes, as we learn from Brac- ton t. At prefent the punifliraent confids in confilca- ting'all the perfonal property of a felo de fe for the ufe of the crown, and in excluding his body from interment in confecrated ground. The warrant of the coroner requires that the body fliould be buried in fome public highway, and a flake driven through it to increafe the ignominy. r . To inquire into the prevalence and caules ot crimes, ■in order to difcover the moft judicious methods of pre¬ venting them, is the duty of the Patriot and the Chnf- tian. Suicide, we find, is a common and an increafing evil : but it is a difficult matter to find an efte&ual re¬ medy ; for what motives can be held out fufficient to influence that man’s mind who is deaf to the voice of nature fpeaking within him, and to the voice of nature s God declaring that he is ftationed at a pofl which it is his duty to maintain ? His reputation and property arc indeed within the reach of the laws, his body may be treated with ignominy, and his property confifcated j but this puniflunent will not be a preventive, even it it could be always inflifted •, and that it is feldom infli£led, though the laws have decreed it, is well known. I he humanity of the prefent age difpofes us to fympathife with the relations of the deceafed, inflead of demanding that the fcntence of the law fhould be executed. It is a generally received opinion, and a juft one, that punifh- jnents decreed by human laws ftiould be dire<51ed only againft fuch crimes as are injurious to fociety ; but when it is hence inferred, that fuicide ought not to be fubjeft to the cognizance of human laws, every rule of logic.is.■ violated. ^Aliere is no man, however mean in ftation and in talents, whofe life may not, on fome occafions, be uieful to the community at large •, and to conclude, that a perfon who fancies himfelf ufelefs may therefore lawfully put a period to his life, is as falfe reafoning as it would be to conclude, that by killing a poor man, who lives on the public, we fhould perform an affion not only innocent but meritorious, as we fliould thereby, free fociety from one of its burdens. SUIDAS, a Greek writer, according to fome, flour- ifhed in the nth century, under the reign of the em-- peror Alexius Comnenus ; according to others,, before the loth century. He wrote in Greek an Hiftorical and Geographical Dictionary or Lexicon 5 a W’ork which, though not always ftri&ly accurate, is neyer- thelefs of great importance, as it contains many things taken from the ancients that are nowhere elfe to be found. The belt edition of Suidas is that of Kuilter, in Greek and Latin, with notes, printed in 3 vols. fol. which has been much improved by Toup. Lapis SUILLUS. See Mineralo¬ gy Index. SUIT, is ufed in different-fenfes ; as, 1. Suit of court, or fuit-fervice, which is an attendance the tenant owes to his lord’s court. 2. Suit-covenant, where a perfon has covenanted to do fervice in the court of the lord. 3. Suit-cuftom, which is where one and his anceftors have owed fuit time out of mind. 4. It is ufed for a Suit. 5 S U I petition to the king or any perfon of dignity, where a lord diftrains his tenant for fuit, and none is due. In this cafe, the party may have an attachment againft. him to appear in the king’s court. . Suit, in Law, the fame with a£tion. The unmans introduced pretty early fct forms for actions and fuits into their law, after the example of the Greeks *, and made it a rule, that each injury (hould be redreffed by its proper remedy only. il ASltones, (fay the Pandc£ts) compojitce Junt (juibus inter fe homines difceptcireni, quas acliones nc populus provt vellet injlitueret, certas fo!em~ ncfque e/]e volucvuntl^ 1. he forms of thele actions were originally preferved in the books of the pontifical col¬ lege as choice and ineftimable fecrets, till one Cneius Flavius, the fecretary of Appius Claudius, ftole a copy and publilhed them to the people. 1 he concealment wTas ridiculous : but the eftablifhment of fome ftandard was undoubtedly neceffary to fix the true ftate of a que- hlackfl. ftion of right; left, in a long and arbitrary procefs, it Co"I?ne*ev might be fhifted continually, and be at length no lon¬ ger difcernible. Or, as Cicero expreffes it, *''' flint jura v funt formulae, de omnibus rebus conjlitula:, ne