bn to vwoJtal Cncpclopaeuta 3Srttanntta OR, A DICTIONARY OF ARTS, SCIENCES, AND MISCELLANEOUS LITERATURE; ENLARGED AND IMPROVED. THE FIFTH EDITION. i fHiwtcateD ixiitl) neartg sir ljunDceD Cngratoings. VOL. XIX. INDOCTI DISCANTJ AMENT MEMINISSE PERITI. EDINBURGH: Printed at the Encyclopedia Press, FOR ARCHIBALD CONSTABLE AND COMPANY, AND THOMSON BONAR, EDINBURGH: GALE, CURTIS, AND FENNER, LONDON ; AND THOMAS WILSON AND SONS, YORK. 1815. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Scripture continued from laft Volume. ss Taremiah. Scripture. TEREMIAH was called to the prophetic office in the » ^ 13th year of the reign of Jofiah the fon of Amon, A. M. 3376, A. C. 628, and continued to prophecy upwards of 40 years, during the reigns of the degene¬ rate princes of Judah, to whom he boldly threatened thofe marks of the divine vengeance which their rebelli¬ ous conduft drew on themfelves and their country. Af¬ ter the deftru&ion of Jerufalem by the Chaldeans, he was fuffered by Nebuchadnezzar to remain in the defo¬ late land of Judea to lament the calamities of his infatu¬ ated countrymen. He was afterwards, as he himfelf in¬ forms us, carried with his difciple Baruch into Egypt, by Johanan the fon of Kareah. It appears from feveral paflages that Jeremiah com¬ mitted his prophecies to writing. In the 36th chapter we are informed, that the prophet was commanded to write upon a roll all the prophecies which he had ut¬ tered ; and when the roll was deftroyed by Jehoiakim the king, Jeremiah di&ated the fame prophecies to Ba¬ ruch, who wrote them together with many additional circumftances. The works of Jeremiah extend to the laft verfe of the 51ft chapter ; in which we have thefe words, “ Thus far the Words of Jeremiah.” The 52ft chapter was therefore added by fome other writer. It is, however, a very important fupplement, as it illuftrates the accompliftiment of Jeremiah’s prophecies refpe£ling the fate of Zedekiah. The prophecies of Jeremiah are not arranged in the chronological order in which they were delivered. onus'wr'T ^^iat ^ias occa^oned this tranfpofition cannot now be determined. It is generally maintained, that if we con- fult their dates, they ought to be thus placed : In the reign of Jofiah the firft t 2 chapters. In the reign of Jehoiakim, chapters xiii. xx. xxi. v. li, 14. ; xxft. xxiii. xxv. Xxvi. xxxv. xxxvi. xlv.—-xlix. 1—33- In the reign of Zedekiah, chap. xxi. T—10. xxiv. 'Xxvii. xxxiv. xxxvii. xxxix. xlix. 34—39. 1. and li. Under the government of Gedaliah, chapters xl. xliv. The oropheeies which related to the Gentiles were con- Vol. XIX. Part I. Chronolo- gi*al ar- tings. tained in the 46th and five following chapters, being Scripture, placed at the end, as in fome meafure unconnefted with —~v—— the reft. But in fome copies of the Septuagint thefe fix chanters follow immediately after the 13th verfe of the 25th chapter. Jeremiah, though deficient neither in elegance nor fublimity, muft give place in both to Ifaiah. Jerome feems to objeft againft him a fort of rufticity of lan¬ guage, no veftige of which Dr Lowth was able to dif- cover. His fentiments, it is true, are not always the moft elevated, nor are his periods always neat and com- pa& y but thefe are faults common to thofe writers whofe principal aim is to excite the gentler affeftions, and to call forth the tear of fympathy or forrow. This obfer- vation is very ftrongly exemplified in the Lamentations!, where thefe are the prevailing paffions j it is, however, frequently inftanced in the prophecies of this author, and moft of all in the beginning of the book (l), which is chiefly poetical. The middle of it is almoft entirely hiftorical. The latter part, again, confifting of the laft fix chapters, is altogether poetical (m) ; it contains fe¬ veral different predictions, which are diftinCtly marked , and in thefe the prophet approaches very near the fubli¬ mity of Ifaiah. On the whole, however, not above half the book of Jeremiah is poetical. 57 The book of Lamentations, as we are informed in The book the title, was compofed by Jeremiah. We fhall prefent f,arnen' to our reader an account of this elegiac poem from the elegant pen of Dr Lowth. TheC amentations of Jeremiah (for the title is pro¬ perly and fignificantly plural) confift of a number of plaintive effufions, compofed on the plan of the funeral dirges, all on the fame fubjeft, and uttered without connection as they rofe in the mind, in a long courfe of feparate ftanzas. Thefe have afterwards been put together, and formed into a collection or correfpondent whole. If any reader, however, fllould expeCt to find in them an artificial and methodical arrangement of the general fubjeCt, a regular difpofition of the parts, a per- feCt connection and orderly fucceffion in the matter, A and (l.) See the whole of chap. ix. chap. xiv. 17, &c. xx. 14—18. (m^i Chap. xlvi.—li. to ver. 59. Chap. Hi. properly belongs to the Lamentations, to which it ferves as an exordium. 58. How di¬ vided. SCR [2 Scripture, and with all this an uninterrupted feries of elegance v anc{ correftnefs, he will really expeft what was foreign to the prophet’s defign. In the charafter of a mourn¬ er, he celebrates in plaintive drains the obfequies of his ruined country : whatever prefented itfelf to his mind in the midft of defolation and mifery, whatever ftruck him as particularly Avretched and calamitous, whatever the inftant fentiment of forrow di&ated, he pours forth in a kind of fpontaneous effufion. He frequently paufes, and, as it were, ruminates upon the fame objeft j fre¬ quently varies and illuftrates the fame thought with different imagery, and a different choice of language j fo that the whole bears rather the appearance of an ac¬ cumulation of correfponding fentiments, than an accu¬ rate and connefted feries of different ideas, arranged in the form of a regular treatife. There is, however, no wild incoherency in the poem j the tranfitions are eafy and elegant. The work is divided into five parts : in the firfl, fe- cond, and fourth chapters, the prophet addreffes the people in his own' perfon, or introduces Jerufalem as fpeaking. In the third chapter a chorus of the Jews is reprefented. In the fifth the whole captive Jews pour forth their united complaints to Almighty God. Each of thefe five parts is diftributed into 22 ftanzas, according to the number of the letters of the alphabet. In the firft three chapters thefe flanzas confifl of three lines. In the firft four chapters the initial letter of each period follows the order of the alphabet *, and in the third chapter each verfe of the fame ftanza be¬ gins with the fame letter. In the fourth chapter all the ftanzas are evidently diftichs, as alfo in the fifth, which is not acroftic. The intention of the acroftic was to affift the memory to retain fentences not much conne&ed. It deferves to be remarked, that the verfes of the firft four chapters are longer by almoft one half than Hebrew verfes generally are : The length of them feems to be on an average about 12 fyllables. The prophet appears to have chofen this meafure as being folemn and melancholy. “ That the fubjeft of the Lamentations is the deftruc- tion of the holy city and temple, the overthrow of the ftate, the extermination of the people •, and that thefe events are deferibed as actually accomplilhed, and not in the ftyle of prediction merely, muft be evident to every reader •, though fome authors of confiderable re- * amputation * have imagined this poem to have been com- jferome, p0fed on the death of King Jofiah. The prophet, in¬ deed, has fo copioufiy, fo tenderly, and poetically,’ be¬ wailed the misfortunes of his country, that he feems completely to have fulfilled the office and duty of a mourner. In my opinion, there is not extant any poem which difplays fueh a happy and fplendid feleCtion of imagery in fo concentrated a ftate. What can be more elegant and poetical, than the defeription of that once fiourilhing city, lately chief among the nations, fitting in the charafter of a female, folitary, afflifted, in a ftate of widowhood, deferted by her friends, betrayed by her deareft connexions, imploring relief, and feeking con- folation in vain ? What a beautiful perfonification is that of “ the ways of Sion mourning becaufe none are come to her folemn feafts ?” How tender and pathetic are the following complaints ? Is this nothing to all you who pafs along the way ? be¬ hold and fee, 3 Lowth. 59 The fub- jedt and beauty of it, Ujjerius, &c. Chap, i, it, 16, ] SCR If there be any fon*ow, like unto my forrow, which is Scripture. infliXed on me •, *[ Which Jehovah infliXed on me in the day of the vio¬ lence of his Avrath. For thefe things I w'eep, my eyes ftream with water; Becaufe the comforter is far away, that fhould tranqui- lize my foul: My children are defolate, becaufe the enemy Avas ftrong. But to detail its beauties Avould be to tranferibe the en¬ tire poem.” tfo Ezekiel was carried to Babylon as a captive, and re-Ezekiel, celved the firft revelations from heaven, in the fifth year of Jehoiakim’s captivity, A. C. 595. The book of Ezekiel is fometimes diftributed under different heads. In the three firft chapters the commiffion of the prophet is deferibed. From the fourth to the thirty-fecond chapter inclufive, the calamities that befel the enemies of the Jew s are prediXed, viz. the Ammonites, the Moab¬ ites, and Philiftines. The ruin of Tyre and of Sidon, and the fall of Egypt, are particularly foretold ; prophe¬ cies Avhich have been fulfilled in the moft literal and aftoniftung manner, as aat have been often affured by the relation of hiftorians and travellers. From the 32ft chapter to the 40th he inveighs againft the hypocrify and murmuring fpirit of his countrymen, admoniftiing them to refignation by promifes of deliverance. In the 38th and 39th chapters he undoubtedly pfediXs the final return of the Joavs from their difperfion in the lat¬ ter days, but in a language fo obfciire that it cannot be underftood till the event take place. The nine laft chapters of this book furniffi the defeription of a very remarkable vifion of a neAV temple and city, of a new religion and polity. I3»I(’» wonders. He relates of his impoftor (Pfeudomantis),^^^.^*' that he attempted nothing fupernatural in the prefence p of the Chriftians and Epicureans. This Pfeudomant^jS. 341. qxclaims before the whole affembly, “ Away with the Chriftians, away with the Epicureans, and let thofe on¬ ly remain who believe in the Deity !” (irirtvovns r« ©s») on which the populace took up ftones to drive away the fufpicious; while the other philofophers, Py¬ thagoreans, Platonifls, and Stoics, as credulous friends and protedtors of the caufe, were permitted to re¬ main f. | AIexan~ It is readily acknowledged, that the arguments*/ feu drawn from the authenticity of the New Teftament only eftablilh the truth of the miracles performed by the apoftles, and are not applicable to the miracles of^-^ig our Saviour; yet, if we admit the firtt three gofpels top. 232, 2330 be genuine, the truth of the Chriftian religion will be 244» *45’ proved from the prophecies of Jefus. For if thefe go¬ fpels were compoftd by Matthew, Mark, and Luke, at the time in which all the primitive Chriftians affirm, that is, previous to the deftrudlion of Jerufalem, they muft be infpired ; for they contain a circumftantial pro¬ phecy of the deftrudlion of .Terufalem, and determine the period at which it was accomplilhed. Now it was impoffible that human fagacity could forefee that event; for when it was predicted nothing was more impro¬ bable. The Jews were refolved to avoid an open re¬ bellion, Avell knowing the greatnefs of their danger, and fubmitted to the oppreffions of their governors in the hope of obtaining redrefs from the court of Rome.—- The circumftance which gave birth to thefe misfortunes is fo trifling in itfelf, that independent of its confe- quences, it would not deferve to be recorded. In the narrow entrance to a fynagogue in Caefarea, fume per- fon had made an offering of birds merely with a view to irritate the Jews. The infult excited their indig¬ nation, and oceafioned the fhedding of blood. With¬ out this trifl’ng accident, which no human wifdom could foreff e even the day before it happened, it is pof- fible that the prophecy of Jefus would never have been r fulfilled. .85 Their au¬ thenticity proved. SCR [9 'Scripture, fulfilled. But florus, tv ho was then procurator of Ju- dea, converted this private quarrel into public hoftili- ties, and compelled the Jewiih nation to rebel contrary to its with and refolution, in order to avoid what the .Tews had threatened, an impeachment before the Ro¬ man emperor for his exceffive cruelties. But even af¬ ter this rebellion had broken out, the deftruction of the temple was a very improbable event. It was not the pradice of the Romans to deftroy the magnificent edifices of the nations which they fubdued •, and of all the Roman generals, none was more unlikely to de- molilh fo ancient and augult a building as Titus Vef- pafian. So important then is the queftion, Whether the books of the New Teftament be genuine ? that the arguments which prove their authenticity, prove alfo the truth of the Chriftian religion. Let us now confider the evi¬ dence which proves the authenticity of the New Te¬ ftament. We receive the books of the New Teftament as the genuine works of Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, and Paul, for the fame reafon that we receive the writings of Xenophon, of Polybius, of Plutarch, of Ctefar, and of Livy. We have the uninterrupted teftimony of all ages, and we have no reafon to fufpedt impolition. This argument is much ftronger when applied to the books of the New Teftament than when applied to any other writings *, for they were addrefled to large focie- ties, were often read in their prefence, and acknowr- ledged by them to be the writings of the apoftles.— Whereas, the moft eminent profane writings which ftill remain were addrelfed only to individuals, or to no per- fons at all : and we have no authority to affirm that they were read in public 5 on the contrary, we know that a liberal education was uncommon 5 books were fcarce, and the knowledge of them was confined to a few individuals in every nation. The New Teftament was read over three quarters of the world, Avhile profane writers were limited to one nation or to one country. An uninterrupted fuccef- ifion of writers from the apoftolic ages to the prefent time quote the facred writings, or make allufions to them : and thefe quotations and allufions are made not only by friends but by enemies. This cannot be aflerted of even the beft elaffic authors. And it is highly probable, that the tranflations of the New Teftament were made fo early as the fecond century •, and in a century or two after, they became very numerous. After this period, it was impoffible to forge new writings, or to corrupt the facfed text, unlefs we can fuppofe that men of dif¬ ferent nations, of different fentiments and different lan¬ guages, and often exceedingly hoftile to one another, fhould all agree in one forgery. This argument is fo ftrong, that if we deny the authenticity of the New Teftament, we may with a thoufand times more pro¬ priety rejeft all the other writings in the world : we may even throw afide human teftimony itfelf. But as this fubject is of great importance, we (hall confider it at more length 5 and to enable our readers to judge with the greater accuracy, we ftiall ftate, from the valuable work of Michaelis, as tranflated by the judicious and learned Mr Marffi, the reafons which may induce a cri¬ tic to fufpeft a work to be fpurious. 1. When doubts have been made from its fifft appear¬ ance in the world, whether it proceeded from the au- Vol. XIX. Part I. 86 Negatively. ] . SCR thor to whom it is afcribed. 2. When the immediate Scripturf friends of the pretended author, who were abh to de- *"v cide upon the fubjedt, have denied it to be his produc-re f< U' tion. 3. When a long feries of years has elapfed af-that would ter his death, in which the book was unknown, and in prove a which it mult unavoidably have been mentioned and000^10'36 quoted, had it really exifted. 4. When the ftyle is dif-^Pu™us" ferent from that of his other writings, or, in cafe no other remain, different from that which might reafon- ably be expedted. 5. When events are recorded which happened later than the time of the pretended author. 6. When opinions are advanced which contradidf thofe he is known to maintain in his other Writings Though this latter argument alone leads to no pofitive con- clufion, fince every man is liable to change his opi¬ nion, or through forgetfulnels to vary in the circum- ftances of the fame relation, < f which Jolephus, in his Antiquities and War of the Jews, affords a linking ex- ample. _ gs I. But it cannot be ftiown that any one doubted ofjyonot ap- its authenticity in the period in which it firft appeared, ply to the 2. No ancient accounts are on record whence we may New Telti- conclude it to be fpurious. 3. No confiderable periodmcnt' elapfed after the death of the apoftles, in which die New Teftament was unknown ; but, on the contrary, it is mentioned by their very contemporaries, and the ac¬ counts of it in the fecond century are ftill more nume¬ rous. 4. No argument can be brought in its disfavour from the nature of the ftyle, it being exadtly fuch as might be expected from the apoftles, not Attic but Jewifh Greek. 5. No fadls are recorded which hap¬ pened after their death. 6. No doctrines are main¬ tained which contradict the known tenets of the au¬ thors, fince, befide the New Teftament, no Writings of the apoftles exift. But, to the honour of the New Te¬ ftament be it fpoken, it contains numerous contradic¬ tions to the tenets and doCtrines of the fathers in the fe- cond and third century, whofe morality wasdifferent from that of the gofpel, which recommends fortitude and fubmiffion to unavoidable evils, but not that enthufiaftic ardour for martyrdom for which thofe centuries are di- ftinguiflied ; it alludes to ceremonies which in the fol¬ lowing ages were either in difufe or totally unknown : all which circumftances infallibly demonftrate that the New Teftament is not a produftion of either of thofe centuries. We {hall now confider the pofitive evidence for the p0{itively. authenticity of the New Teftament. Thefe may be ar¬ ranged under the three following heads : I. The impoffibility of a forgery, arifing from the nature of the thing itfelf. 2. The ancient Chriftian, Jewifh, and Heathen teftimony in its favour. 3. Its own internal evidence. 90 1. The impoffibility of a forgery arifing from the na-Impoffibili- ture of the thing itfelf is evident. It is impoffible to1}' a for" eftabliffi forged writings as authentic in any place where 1 there are perfons ftrongly inclined and well qualified tonat|ire 0f deteCl the fraud. Now the Jews were the moft violent the thing, enemies of Chriftianity. 'They put the founder of it to death j they' perfecuted his difeiples with implacable fury 5 and they were anxious to ftifle the new religion in its birth. If the writings of the New Teftament had been forged, would not the Jews have detefted the impofture ? Is there a fingle inftance on record where a few ihdividuals have impofed a hiftory upon the world B againft 91 . From tefti- mony. SCR [ i. Scripture, again ft the teftlmonv of a whole nation ? Would the inhabitants of Paleiline have received the gofpels, if they had not bad fufficient evidence that Jefus Chrift really appeared among them, and performed the mira¬ cles afcribed to him ? Or would the churches of Rome or of Corinth have acknowledged the epiftles addreffed to them as the genuine works of Paul, if Paul had never preached among them ? We might as well think to prove, that the hiftory of the Reformation is the inven¬ tion of hiftorians j and that no revolution happened in Great Britain during the laft century. 2. The fecond kind of evidence which we produce to prove the authenticity of the New Teftament, is the teftimony of ancient writers, Chriftians, Jews, and Hea¬ thens, In reviewing the evidence of teftimony, it will not be expected that we ftiould begin at the prefent age, and trace backwards the authors who have written on this fubjeft to the firft ages of Chriftianity. This in¬ deed, though a laborious talk, could be performed in the moft complete manner 5 the whole feries of authors, numerous in every age, who have quoted from the books of the New Teftamentr written commentaries upon them, tranllated them into different languages, or who have drawn up a lift of them, could be exhibited fo as to form fuch a perfeft body of evidence, that we imagine even a jury of deifts would find it impoflible, upon a de¬ liberate and candid examination, to reject or dilbelieve it. We do not, however, fuppofe that fcepticifm has yet arrived at fo great a height as to render fuch a tedi¬ ous and circumftantial evidence neceffary. Palling over the intermediate fpace, therefore, Ave lhall afcend at once to the fourth century, when the evidence for the authen¬ ticity of the New Teftament was fully eftablilhed, and trace it back from that period to the age of the apoftles. We hope that this method of ftating the evidence will ] SCR appear more natural, and will afford more fatisfa£lion, Scripture, than that which has been ufually adopted. ' "—v “ It is furely more natural, when we inveftigate the truth of any fad which depends on a feries of teftimo¬ ny, to begin with thofe witneffes who lived neareft the prefent age, and whofe charaders are beft eftablilhed. In this Avay we lhall learn from themfelves the founda¬ tion of their belief, and the charaders of thofe from whom they derived it; and thus we afcend till we ar¬ rive at its origin. This mode of inveftigation will give more fatisfadion to the deift than the ufual way ; and we believe no Chriftian, who is confident of the goodnefs of his caufe, will be unwilling to grant any proper conceflions. The deift will thus have an oppor¬ tunity of examining, feparately, what he will confider as the weakeft parts of the evidence, thofe which are exhibited by the earlieft Chriftian writers, confifting of expreflions, and not quotations, taken from the New Teftament. The Chriftian, on the other hand, ought to wilh, that thefe apparently weak parts of the evi¬ dence were diftindly examined, for they will afford an irrefragable proof that the New Teftament was not for¬ ged : and ftiould the deift rejed the evidence of thofe early writers, it will be incumbent on him to account for the origin of the Chriftian religion, which he will find more difficult than to admit the common hypo- thefis. In the fourth century we could produce the teftimo- nies of numerous witneffes to prove that the books of the New Teftament exifted at that time ; but it will be fufficient to mention their names, the time in which they wrote, and the fubftance of their evidence. This we ftiall prefent in a concife form in the following table, which is taken from Jones’s New and Full Method of eftabliffiing the canon of the New Teftament. The names of the Writers. Times in which they lived. The variation or agreement of their catalogues with ours now received. The books in which thefe catalogues are. I. Athanafius biffiop of A- lexandria. II. Cyril biffiop of Jerufa- lem. III. The biffiops affembled in the council of Lao- dicea. IV. Epiphanius biffiop of Sa- lamis in Cyprus. V. Gregory Nazianzen bi¬ ffiop of Conftantino- ple. A. C. S'S- 34°- 364* 370. 37J- The fame perfedly with ours now received. The fame with ours, only the Re¬ velation is omitted. The Revelation is omitted. The fame with ours now received. Omits the Rev.elation. Fragment. Fpijl. Tefal, tom. ii. in Synopf. tom. i. Catech. IV. § ult. p. 101. Canon LIX. N. B. The Canons of this council were not long afterwards recei¬ ved into the body of the canons of the univerfal church. Hceref. 76. cont. Anom. p. 399. Curm. de veris et genttin. Scriptur. sen SCR [ n ] Scripture. The Names of the Writers. VI. Philaftriusbifhop of Brix- ia in Venice. VII. Jerome. VIII. Ruffin prefbyter of Aqui- legium. IX. Auftin bifhop of Hippo in Africa. X. The XLIV biffiops af- fembled in the third council of Carthage. Times in which they lived. 380. 382. 39°- 394- St Auftin was pre- fent at it. The variation or agreement of their catalogues with ours now received. The fame with ours now received ; except that he mentions only 13 of St Paul’s epiltles (omitting very probably the Epitlle to the Hebrews), and leaves out the Revelation. The fame with ours $ except that he fpeaks dubioufly of the E- piftle to the Hebrews; though in other parts of his writings he receives it as canonical. It perfectly agrees with ours. It perfe&ly agrees with ours. It perfectly agrees with ours. The books in which thefe catalogues are. Lib. de Hceref. Numb. 87. Ep. ad Paulin. TraB. 6. p. 2. Alfo commonly prefixed to the Latin vulgar. Expof. in Symb. Apojlol. § 36. int. Ep. Hieron. Par. 1. TraB. 3. p. no. et inter Op. Cypr. p. 575. De DoBrin. Chrifl. lib. ii. c. 8. Tom. Op. 3. p. 25. Vid. Canon XLVII. et cap. ult. \ Scripture Teftimo- We now go back to Eufebius, who wrote about the nies of the year 315, and whofe catalogue of the books of the New ancient Teftament we (hall mention at more length. “ Let us n lans. 0^perve ^fayS |ie) the writings of the apoftle John, which are uncontradiBed; and, firft of all, muft be men¬ tioned, as acknowledged of all, the gofpel, according to him, well known to all the churches under heaven.” Paley's E- The author then proceeds to relate the occafions of evidences of writjng the gofpels, and the reafons for placing St John’s y*- the laft, manifeftly fpeaking of all the four as equal in y' their authority, and in the certainty of their original. The fecond paffage is taken from a chapter, the title of which is, “ Of the Scriptures univerfally acknowledged, OfEufe- and of thofe that are not fuch.” Eufebius begins his bias. enumeration in the following manner : “ In the firft place, are to be ranked the facred four Gofpels, then the book of the A&s of the Apoftles ; after that are to be reckoned the epiftles of Paul: in the next place, that called the firft Epiftle of John and the Epiftle of Peter are to be efteemed authentic : after this is to be placed, if it be thought fit, the Revelation of John j about which we (hall obferve the different opinions at proper feafons. Of the controverted, but yet well known or approved by the moft, are that called the Epiftle of James and that of Jude, the fecond of Peter, and the fecond and third of John, whether they were written by the evan- gelift or by another of the fame name.” He then pro¬ ceeds to reckon up five others, not in our canon, which he calls in one place fpurious, in another controvert¬ ed; evidently meaning the fame thing by thefe two words (s). 94 A. D. 290, Vi&orin bilhop of Pettaw in Germany, Of Vido- in a commentary upon this text of the Revelation, r‘n* “ The firft was like a lion, the fecond was like a calf, the third like a man, and the fourth like a flying eagle,” makes out, that by the four creatures are intended the four gofpels j and to fhow the propriety of the fymbols, he recites the fubjeft with which each evangelift opens his hiftory. The explication is fanciful, but the tefti- mony pofitive. He alfo exprefsly cites the A£ts of the Apoftlts. p 95 . A. D. 230, Cyprian bilhop of Carthage gives the Of Cypri- following teftimony : “ The church (fays this father) an is watered like Paradife by four rivers, that is, by four gofpels.” The A£ls of the Apoftles are alfo frequently quoted by Cyprian under that name, and under the name of the Divine Scriptures.''' In his various wri¬ tings are fuch frequent and copious citations of Scrip¬ ture, as to place this part of the teftimony beyond.con- troverfy. Nor is there, in the works of this eminent African biftiop, one quotation of a fpurious or apocry¬ phal Chriftian writing.” pfp0t' A. D. 1x6, Papias, a hearer of John, and companion ot of Polycarp, as Irenmus attefts, and of the apoftolical age as all agree, in a paflage quoted by Eufebius, from a w'ork now loft, exprefsly afcribes the two firft gofpels to Matthew and Mark ; and in a manner which proves that thefe gofpels muft have publicly borne the names of thefe authors at that time, and probably long before \ for Papias does not fay, that one gofpel was written by Matthew, and another by Mark ; but, affuming this as perfectly well known, he tells us from what materials Mark collected his account, viz. from Peter’s preaching, and in what language Matthew wrote, viz. in Hebrew. Whether Papias was well informed in this ftatement or not, to the point for which this teftimony is produced, namely, that thefe books bore thefe names at this time, his authority is complete. Papias hknfelf declares that he received his accounts of Chriftianity from thofe -who were acquainted with the apoftles, and that thofe accounts which he thus received from the older Chriftians, and had committed to memory, * Pr/efat* he inferted in his books. He farther adds, that he was Op. ~ very felicitous to obtain every poflible information, efpe- cially to learn what the apoftles faid and preached, v^* 2?^/. lib.iiL luing fuch information more than what was written inc. 35. books*". nfp°i? A. D. 108, Polycarp was the biihop of Smyrna, and difciple of John the Apoftle. This teftimony concern- ^ ing Polycarp is given by Irenseus, who in his youth had feen him. “ I can tell the place,” faith Irenaeus,.“ in which the bleffed Polycarp fat and taught, and his go¬ ing out and coming in, and the manner of his life, and the form of his perfon, and the difeourfes he made to the people, and how he related bis converfation with John and others who had feen the Lord, and how he related their fayings, and what he had heard concern¬ ing the Lord, both concerning his miracles and his doc¬ trine, as he had received them from the eye-witneffes pf the word of life ; all which Polycarp related agreeable to the feriptures.” Of Polycarp, whofe proximity to the age, and country and perfons of the apoftles is thus attefted, we have one undoubted epiftle remaining ; which, though a fiiort performance, contains nearly 40 clear allufions to the books of the New Teftament. This is ftrong evidence of the refpeft which was paid to them by Chriftians of that age. Amongft thefe, although the writings of St Paul are more frequently ufed by Polycarp than other parts of feripture, there are copious allufions to the gof¬ pel of St Matthew, fome to paflages found in the gofpels both of Matthew and Luke, and fome which more nearly referable the words in Luke. He thus fixes the authority of the Lord’s Prayer, and the ufe of it among Chriftians, If, therefore, we pray th33> ?r Chrift’s difciples to little children j the faying, “ he Lllke xih that putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, com- t’Matt mitteth adultery § j” the Angular expreflion, “ having xui. 3, or received all power from his Father,” is probably an allu- Luke viii. fion to Matt, xxviii. 18. and Chrift being the “ gate,”5- or only way of coming “ to God,” is a plain allufion to ^Luke xvir John xiv. 6. x. 7. 9. There is alfo a probable allufion to A tI It has been a queftion who the foldiers were who are ^n(j fronl faid in the gofpel of Luke to have addreffed John the remarkable Baptift in thefe words, What Jhall we do ? An anfwer inftances of to this queftion maybe found in Jofephus*. Herod ™'nc“^encw the tetrarch of Galilee was engaged in a war with his j(;i'ep}lus father-in-law Aretas, a petty king in Arabia Petrma, at and the the very time that John was preaching in the wilder-r®f- nefs: and the road from Galilee to Arabia running-tjirnient" through that wildernefs, the foldiers on their march had ^ this interview with the Baptift. A coincidence like this, cap. 5. C which fed. x, s. [ 17 1 (z) The ftyle of Clemens Romanus may perhaps be an exception. By many eminent critics it has been thought fo like to that of the epiftle to the Hebrews, as to give room for the opinion that Clement either was the author of that epiftle, or was the perfon who tranflated it from the Syro-Chaldaic language, in which it was origi¬ nally compofed. Chap. ii. I ii. * Arts xxiii. a. SCR [ i Scripture, which has been overlooked by all the commentators, would not probably be attended to in a forgery. Another inftanee of an agreement no lefs remarkable we (hall quote from the valuable work of Michaelis. It has been a queftion of feme difficulty among the learned, who was the iknanias who commanded St Paul to be fmitten on the mouth when he was making his defence before the council in Jerufalem *. Krebs, in his remarks taken from Jofephus, has ffiown him to have been the fun of Nebedeni. But if fo, how can it be reconciled with chronology, that Ananias was, at that time, called high prieft, when it is certain from Jofe- phrts that the time of his holding that office was much earlier ? And how comes it to pafs that St Paul fays, “ I wift not, brethren, that he was the high prieft ?” The facerdotal garb muft have difeovered w ho he was : a jeft would have ill-fuited the gravity of a tribunal 5 and a falfehood is inconftftent with the charaTer of St Paul. All thefe difficulties vanifh as foon as we examine the fpecial hiftory of that period : “ Ananias the fon of Ne¬ bedeni was high prieft at the time that Helena queen of Adiabene fupplied the Jews with corn from Egypt during the famine which took place in the fourth year of Claudius, mentioned in the eleventh chapter of the Arts. St Paul therefore, who took a journey to Jeru¬ falem at that period, could not have been ignorant of the elevation of Ananias to that dignity. Soon after the holding of the lirft council, as it is called, at Jeru- falcm, Ananias wTas difpoffeffed of his office, in confe- quence of certain adls of violence between the Samari¬ tans and the Jews, and fent prifoner to Rome-, but being afterwards releafed, he returned to Jerufalem. Now from that period he could not be called high-priejl in the pro¬ per fenfe of the word, though Jofephus has fometimes given him the title of taken in the more exten- ilve meaning of a prieft who had a feat and voice in the Sanhedrim ; and Jonathan, though w-e are not ac¬ quainted with the circumftances of his elevation, had been raifed in the mean time to the fupreme dignity in the Jewiffi church. Between the death of Jonathan, who was murdered by order of Felix, and the high- priefthood of Ifmael, who was invefted with that dignity by Agrippa, elapfed an interval during which the fa¬ cerdotal office was vacant. Now it happened precifely in this interval that St Paul was apprehended in Jerufa¬ lem : and, the Sanhedrim being deftitute of a prefident, he undertook of his own authority the difeharge of that office, which he executed with the greateft tyranny. It is poffible therefore that St Paul, who had been on¬ ly a few days in Jerufalem, might be ignorant that A- nanias, who had been difpoffeffed of the priefthood, had taken upon himftlf a truft to which he was not entitled ; he might therefore very naturally exclaim, ‘ I wift not, brethren, that he was the high-prieft !’ Admitting him on the other hand to have been acquainted with the fa<5t, the expreffion muft be- eonfidered as an indirefl reproof, and a tacit refufal to recognize ufurped au¬ thority.^ Could fuck a correfpondenee as this fubfift between truth and falfehood, between a forgery and an authen¬ tic hiftory ? or is it credible that thefe events could be related by any perfon but a contemporary ? Impreffed with the love of truth, and feeling con¬ tempt as well as deteftation at pious frauds, we hefitate 8 1 SCR not to acknowledge, that in fume particular fatfs there Scripture, is a difference either real or apparent between Jofephus -v—* and the writers of the New Teftament. The objec-Ti 114 tions arifing from thefe differences are of two kinds : alfoappa? I. Such as would prove a book not to have been Avrit- rent incon- ten by the author to whom it is aferibed. 2. Such as fiftencies, would prove that the author w'as miftaken, and there- but. tlie:fc fore not divinely infpired. To the firft clafs belongsarTfeftonr the folloAving objedlion : St Paul fays (2 Cor. xi. 32.) overfight that the governor of Damafcus was under Aretas thein Jofe- king : but if aatc are to judge from the 18th book of^bus» the Jewiffi Antiquities, Avhich correfponds Avith the pe¬ riod of St Paul’s journey to Damafcus, that city muft have belonged at that time to the Romans ; and Avhat authority could Aretas, a petty king in Arabia Petrma, have in fuch a city ? In anfAver to this queftion, J. G. Hyne, in a differtation publiflied in 1755, has ffiown it to be highly probable that Aretas, againft Avhom the Romans, not long before the death of Tiberius, made a declaration of Avar, which they negle&ed to put in execution, took the opportunity of feizing Damafcus, Avhich had once belonged to his anceftors ; an event omitted by Jofephus, as forming no part of the JeAvilh hiftory, and by the Roman hiftorians as being a matter not flattering in itfelf, and belonging only to a diftant province. Secondly, That Aretas Avas by religion a Jcav j a circumftanee the more credible, when Ave refleft that Judaifm had been Avidely propagated in that country, and that even kings in Arabia Felix had recognized the law of Mofes. The difficulty then is fo far reimwed, that it ceafes to create fufpicion againft an epiftle Avhich has fo many evident marks of authenticity ; and it is only to be regretted that, in order to place the. fubjedft in the cleareft point of vieAV, avc are not fuf- ficiently acquainted Avith the particular hiftory of Da¬ mafcus. Examples of the fccond kind are fuch as, if alloAved their full force, might indeed prove a writer not divine¬ ly infpired, but could afford no reafon to conclude that he was not the author of the Avritings Avhich bear his name, fince miftakes may be committed by the moft ac- JT „ curate hiftorian. The chief difficulties of this nature or to his are found in the gofpel according to St Luke, and do want of au~ not apply to the writings of MattheAv, John, Paul, and identic in- Peter. Laying afide the idea of infpiration altogether, ^orm human witneffes ; and their divine authority is never to the opi- prefuppofed, when wre difeufs the queftion of miracles, nton ot guj. mereiy their credibility as human evidence. If the Michaelis. m;racqes are true which the evangelifts relate, the doc¬ trines of Chrift recorded in the gofpels are proved to be the infallible oracles of God ; and, even if w7e admit the apoftles to be miflaken in certain not effential cir- cumfiances, yet as the main points of the religion which Chrift commiflioned them to preach are fo frequently repeated, their epiftles would inftrudft us as well in the tenets of the Chriftian fyftem, as the works of Maclau- rin in the philofophy of Newton. It is poffible there¬ fore to doubt, and even deny, the infpiration of the New Teftament, and yet be fully perfuaded of the truth of the Chriftian religion : and many really entertain thefe fen time Tits either publicly or in private, to whom we 9 1 ' s C tl fhould render great injuftice, if we ranked them in the Scnptur^ clafs of unbelievers. ' v “ Yet the Chriftian religion w7ould be attended with difficulty, if our principium cognofccndixa^A not on firm¬ er ground ; and it might be objected, that fufficient care had not been taken for thofe whofe confeiences were tender, and who were anxioufly fgarful of mi fla¬ king the fmalleft of the divine commands. The chief articles indeed of Chriftianity are fo frequently'repeat¬ ed, both by Chrift and his apoftles, that even were the New Teftament not infpired, we could entertain no doubt of the folloAving do&rines : ‘ Jefus was the Mef- fias of the Jews, and an infallible meffenger of God : he died for our iniquity •, and by the fatisfaclion made by his death w7e obtain remiffion of fins, if on our part be faith and amendment of life': the Levitical law is abo- liftied, and moral precepts, with the ceremonies of Bap- tifm and the Supper of the Lord, are appointed in its ftead ; after the prefent follows an everlafting life, in which the virtuous (hall be rewarded and the nicked puniffied, and wffiere Chrift hitnfelf {hall be the Judge.’ “ To the epiftles indeed (fays Michaelis), infpiration is of real confequence ; but with refpefl to the hiftori- cal books, viz. the Gofpels and the A61s of the A- poftks, we fhould really be no lofers if we abandoned the fyftem of infpiration, and in feme refpefts have a real advantage. We fhould be no lofers, if we confidered the apoftles in hiftorical fafts as merely human witneffe?, as Chrift himfelf has done in faying, ‘ Ye alfe {hall bear witnefs, becaufe ye have been with me from the begin¬ ning And no one that attempts to convince an un- * John xv. believer of the truth of Chriftianity, would begin his 27- demonftration by prefuppofing a doftrine which his ad- verfary denies, but would ground his arguments on the credibility of the evangelifts as human biftorians, for the truth of the miracles, the death, and the refurreftion of Chrift. Even thofe who examine the grounds of their faith for their ow'n private conviftion, muft treat the evangelifts as human evidence *, fince it would be argu¬ ing in a circle to conclude that the fa&s recorded in the gofpels are Jrue, becaufe they are infpired, when we conclude the Scriptures to be infpired in confequence of their contents. In thefe cafes, then, we are obliged to confider the evangelifts as human evidence j and it would be no detriment to the Chriftian caufe to confider them at all times as fuch in matters of hiftorical fadft. We find it nowhere exprefsly recorded that the public tranf- aftions which the apoftles knew by their own experi¬ ence, and of which St Luke informed himfelf by dili¬ gent inquiry, fhould be particular objects of divine in- fpiration. We fhould even be confiderable gainers, in adjufting the harmony of the gofpels, if we were permit¬ ted to fuppofe that feme one of the evangelifts had com¬ mitted an immaterial error, and that St John has recti¬ fied feme trifling miftakes in the preceuing gofpels. The moft dangerous objections which can be made to the truth of our religion, and fuch as are molt difficult to anfwer, are thofe drawn from tho different relations of the four evtmgelifts.'’ x .S Before any inquiry is made refpeCting the Infpiration Mkrort of the books of the New Teftament, it is neceffary to™^)1™11^01 determine the meaning of the term ; for theologians have given to it a variety of fignificatiens. Moft of the German divines make it to confift in an infufion of C 2 words SCR [ 20 ] SCR , Scripture, words as well as ideas. Luther, Beza, and Salmafius, v reftridl it to ideas alone. Doddridge underftands by it an intervention of the Deity, by which the natural fa¬ culties of the mind were direfted to the difcovery of truth. Warburton and Law think it was a negative intervention to preferve the facred writers from elfential errors. Some believe every circumilance was diftated by the Holy Ghoft} others fuppofe that no fupernatural affiilance was granted except in the epiftolary writings. See INSPIRATION. As ihere is an evident diftinftion between infpiration and revelation, and as the origin of the Chriftian reli¬ gion may be {till proved divine, even though it were de¬ nied that thofe who record its fafts and do61rines were infpired in the a£t of writing, it will be moft judicious and fafe to employ the word infpiration in that fenfe which can be molt eafily defended and fupported. By doing this, much may be gained and nothing loft. It is difficult to prove to a deift that the words of Scrip¬ ture are divine, becaufe he fees that every writer has words and phrafes peculiar to himfelf. It is difficult alfo to prove that the ideas were infufed into the mind of the authors while they were engaged in the aft of writing j becaufe concerning fafts they appeal not to divine infpiration, but declare what they have feeti and heard. In reafoning they add their own fentiments to what they had received from the Lord, and fubjoin, ef- pecially in their epiftles, things not connefted with reli¬ gion. .1 he definition which Doddridge gives, feems applicable to ordinary gifts or the ufual endowments of rational creatures, rather than to the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Spirit, which were beftowed on the apoftles. Thofe who maintain that every faft or circumftance was fuggefted by divine infpiration, will find it no eafy mat¬ ter to prove their pofition. The opinion of Warburton and Law, with proper explanations, feems moft probable. The opinion of Grotius, that only the epiftles were in¬ fpired, may be eafily refuted. The proof of the authenticity of the New Teftament depends on human teftimony : The proof of its infpi¬ ration is derived from the declaration of infpired per- 119 fons- The proof In proving that the New Teftaroent is infpired, we of it tie- prefuppofed its authenticity, that the facred books were the decla wr^en ^7 apoftles whofe names they bear, and rations of ^iey have been conveyed to us pure and uncor- Chritt and rupted. This we have already attempted to prove, and his apoftles. we hope with fuccefs. The evidence of infpiration is the teftimony of Chrift and his apoftles, which we re¬ ceive as credible, becaufe they confirmed their doftrines by miracles. From the important miffion of Chrift and his apoftles, we infer that every power was beftowed which divine wifdom thought expedient j and from their conduft we conclude, that it is morally impoffible that they could lay claim to any powers which they did not poflcfs. It is proper therefore to inquire into the de¬ clarations of Chrift and his apoftles concerning the na¬ ture, degree, and extent, of the infpiration beftowed on 130 the writers of the facred books. The decla- If we confider Chrift’s more immediate promifes of Chrift5 infpirat*on to the apoftles, we ffiall find tha* he has given them, in the moft proper fenfe of the word, at ffiree feveral periods, ift, When he fent the apoftles to * Matt. x. preach the gofpel * j 2dly, In holding a public difcourfe l9> relating to the gofpel, at which were prefent a confi- derable multitude; gdly, In his prophecy of the de- Scripture. ftrudion of Jerufalem f. When he fent the apoftles to ' ' preach the gofpel, he thus addreffed them : “ When* Mark xii’* they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye *2 ftiall fpeak, for it ffiall be given you in that fame hour ' ' 4’ what ye ffiall fpeak ; for it is not you that fpeak, but the fpirit of your Father that fpeaketh in you.” The fame promne was made almoft in the fame words in the prefence of an immenfe multitude (Luke xii. 11, 12.). Irom thefe paffages it has been urged, that if the a- poftles were to be infpired in the prefence of magiftrates in delivering fpeeches, which were foon to be forgotten, it is furely reafonable to conclude that they wTould be infpired when they were to compofe a ftandard of faith for the ufe of all future generations of Chriftians. If this conclufion be fairly deduced, it would follow that the writings of the New Teftament are the di&ates of infpiration, not only in the doftrines and precepts, but in the very words. But it is a conclufion to which fincere Chriftians have made objeftions; for, fay they, though Chrift promifes to affift his apoftles in cafes of great emergency, where their own prudence and forti¬ tude could not be fufficient, it does not follow that he would diftate to them thofe fafts which they know al¬ ready, or thofe reafonings which their own calm reflec¬ tion might fupply. Befides, fay they, if the New Tef¬ tament was diftated by the Holy Spirit, and only pen¬ ned by the apoftles, what reafon can be given for the care with which Chrift inftrufted them, both during his miniftry and after his crucifixion, in thofe things per¬ taining to the kingdom of God ? I2I In anfwer to this we may obferve, that though it beProperideas difficult to prove that the identical words of the Newof infpira- Teftament were diftated by the Holy Spirit, or the traintl0n’ of ideas infufed into the minds of the facred writers, there is one fpecies of infpiration to which the New Teftament has an undoubted claim. It is this, that the memories of the apoftles were ftrengthened and their underftandingsprefervedfrom falling into effentialerrors. This we prove from thefe words of our Saviour, “ and I will pray the Father, and he will give you another comforter, that he may abide with you for ever. He ffiall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance whatfoever I have faid unto you * Jokn xi-1"* This promife wras furely not reftrained to the day of16’ x6' Pentecoft: it muft have been a permanent gift, enabling the apoftles at all times to remember with accuracy the difeourfes of our Saviour. When the apoftles there¬ fore (Matthew and John) relate thofe precepts of Chrift which they themfelves had heard, they write indeed from memory, but under the proteftion of the fpirit who fecures them from the danger of miftake : and we muft of courfe conclude that their gofpels are infpired. Were we called upon more particularly to declare what parts of the New Teftament we believe to be in¬ fpired, we would anfwer, The doftrines, the precepts, and the prophecies, every thing eflential to the Chriftian religion. From thefe the idea of infpiration is infepa- rable. As to the events, the memory of the apoftles- was fufficient to retain them. If this opinion be juft, it would enable us to account for the difcrepancies be¬ tween the facred writers, which are chiefly confined to the relation of fafts and events. All the books of the New Teftament were originally written in Greek, except the Gofpel according to Mat¬ thew Scripture. 12a Language in which the New Teftament was com- pofed. 123 Why the greateft part of it is written tn Greek. Michaelis, vol. i. chap iv. fedt. x. p. xoi. SCR [ 2 thew and the epiiile to the Hebrews, which there is reafon to believe were compofed in the Syro-Chaldaic language, which in the New Teftament is called He¬ brew. Various reafons have been afligned why the greateft part of the New Teftament was written in Greek •, but the true reafon is this, It was the language beft under- ftood both by writers and readers. Had St Paul writ¬ ten to a community in the Roman province of Africa, he might have written perhaps in Latin j but epiftles to the inhabitants of Corinth, Galatia, Ephefus, Philip¬ pi, and Theffalonica, to Timothy, Titus, and Philemon, from a native of Tarfus, could hardly be expe&ed in any other language than Greek. The fame may be faid of the epiftles of St Peter, which are addreffed to the Chriftians of different countries, who had no other language in common than the Greek j and likewife of the epiftles of St James, who wrote to Jews, that lived at a diftance from Paleftine, and were ignorant of He¬ brew. The native language of St Luke, as well as of Theophilus, to whom he addrefled his gofpel, and Afts of the apoftles, appears to have been Greek; and that St John wrote his gofpel in that language, and not in Hebrew, is by no means a matter of furprife, fince he wrote at Ephefus. With refpeft to the epiftle to the Romans, it may be afked indeed why St Paul did not write in Latin ? Now, whoever propofes this queftion, muft prefuppofe that St Paul was mafter of the Latin language in fuch a degree as to find no difficulty in writing it j a matter which remains to be proved. It is very probable that St Paul was acquainted with the Latin •, but between underftanding a language, and being able to write it, there is a very material difference. As St Paul was a native of Tarfus, his native language was Greek j he had travelled during feveral years through countries in which no other language was fpoken, and when he ad¬ dreffed the Roman centurion at Jerufalem, he fpoke not Latin, but Greek. Is it extraordinary, then, that in writing to the inhabitants of Rome he fliould have ufed a language which was there fo generally under- ftood ? It has been long remarked, that Greek was at that time as well known in Rome as French in any court of modern Europe j that according to Juvenal even the female fex made ufe of Greek as the language of familiarity and paffion j and that in letters of friend- Ihip Greek words and phrafes were introduced with greater freedom than French expreffions in German letters, as appears from CicenPs epiftles to Atticus, and from thofe of Auguftus preferved in the works of Suetonius. To this muft be added a material circum- ftance, that a great part of the Roman Chriftians con- fifted of native Jews, who were better acquainted with Greek than with Latin, as either they themfelves or their anceftors had come from Greece, Afia Minor, or Egypt, in which Greek was the language of the coun¬ try. At leaft they read the Bible in that language, as no Latin tranflation of the Old Teftament at that time exifted j and the Chriftian church at that period con- lifting chiefly of Jews, the heathen converts in Rome were of courfe under the neceffity of accuftoming them¬ felves to the Greek language. In ffiort, St Paul in his epiftle to the Romans made ufe of a language in which alone thofe who were ignorant of Hebrew could read the Bible. What has been here advanced refpe&ing the 3 1 ] SCR epiftle to the Romans is equally applicable to the Greek Scripture, of St Mark, on the fuppofition that it was written atv—' Rome. To the above arguments may be added the example of Jofephus, who, as well as the apoftles, was by birth a Jew\ He even lived in Rome, which is more than can be faid of St Paul and St Mark, who refided there only a certain time : he was likewife younger than either j he came to Italy at an age which is highly fuitable to the learning of a language, and previous to that period had fpent feveral years in the Roman camp. The Jewifh antiquities, the hiftory of the Jewiffi war, and the account of his own life, he wrote undoubtedly with a view of their being read by the Romans ; and yet he compofed all thefe writings in Greek. He ex- preffes his motive for writing his Greek account of the Jewifh war in the following terms : “ That having writ¬ ten in his native language (i. e. the Hebrew dialeft at that time fpoken) a hiftory of the war, in order that Parthians, Babylonians, Arabians, Adiabenes, and the Jews beyond the Euphrates, might be informed of thofe events, he was now refolved to write for the Greeks and Romans, who had not been engaged in the cam¬ paigns, a more certain account than had hitherto been given.” The motives which induced Jofephus to write in Greek are fully as applicable to St Paul and St Mark. Michaelis has thus chara<5lerized the ftyle of the New , .. Teftament. “ The New Teftament (fays he) was writ-voi ‘S>‘ ten in a language at that time common among the Jews, chap. iv. which may be named Hebraic Greek ; the firft traces 3* of which we find in the tranflation of the LXX. P 1I1* “ Every man acquainted with the Greek language, js fuu2Qt* who had never heard of the New Teftament, muft im-Hebrait'ms, mediately perceive, on reading only a few lines, that the ftyle is widely different from that of the claffic au¬ thors. We find this charafler in all the books of the New Teftament in a greater or lefs degree, but we muft not therefore conclude that they poffefs an uni¬ formity of ftyle. The harfheft Hebraifms, which ex¬ tended even to grammatical errors in the government of cafes, are the diftinguiffiing marks of the book of Re¬ velation j but they are accompanied with tokens of ge¬ nius and poetical enthufiafm of which every reader muft: be fenfible who has tafte and feeling. There is no tranf¬ lation of it which is not read with pleafure even in the days of childhood y and the very faults of grammar are fo happily placed as to produce an agreeable effeft. The gofpels of St Matthew and St Mark have ftrong marks of this Hebraic ftyle $ the former has harfher Hebraifms than the latter, the fault of which may be afcribed to the Greek tranflator, who has made too literal a ver- fion, and yet the gofpel of St Mark is written in worfe language, and in a manner that is lefs agreeable. The epiftles of St James and St Jude are fomewhat better y but even thefe are full of Hebraifms, and betray in other refpe£!s a certain Hebrew tone. St Luke has in feveral paffages rvritten pure and claffic Greek, of which the firft four verfesof his gofpel may be given as an inftance : in the fequel, where he defcribes the aflions of Chrift, he has very harfti Hebraifms, yet the ftyle is more agreeable than that of St Matthew or St Mark. In the A Itudy the language of the New Teflament with attention, we would ftrenuouf- ly recommend the perufal of this work, which in the Englifh tranllation is one of the molt valuable aeceflions to fcriptural criticifm that has yet appeared. We fpeak of the Englilh tranflation, which the large and judicious notes of Mr Marfli has rendered infinitely fuperior to the original. To the obfervations which have been made refpefling the language of the New Teltament, a few remarks may be added concerning the peculiarities of the Itylr and manner of the facred writers, particularly the hiftofians. Thefe remarks extend to the Old Teftament as well as to the New.—The firft quality for which the facred hi (lory is remarkable is fimplicity in the ftrufture of the fentences. The firft five verfes of Genefis furnifh an example, which confift of eleven fentences. The fubftantives are not attended by adjeftives, nor the verbs by adverbs, no fynonymas, no fuperlatives, no effort at exprefting things in a bold, emphatical, or uncommon manner. 2. The fecond quality is fimplicity of fentiment, par¬ ticularly in the Pentateuch, arifing from the very na¬ ture of the early and uncultivated ftate of fociety about which that book is converfant. 3. Simplicity of defign. The fubjeft of the narra¬ tive fo engroffes the attention of the writer, that he himfeif is as nobody/ He introduces nothing as from himfelf, no remarks, doubts, conjeftures, or reafonings. Our Lord’s biographers particularly excel in this qua¬ lity. This quality of ftyle we meet with in Xenophon and Csefar. The Evangelifts may be ranked next to Genefis for fimplicity of compofition in the fentences. John and Matthew are diftinguifhed for it more than Mark and Luke. But the fentiment is not fo remarkable for fimplicity in the Evangelift as the Pentateuch. The reafons of this difference are, I. The ftate of the Jews was totally changed j their manners, cuftoms, &c. fplit into factions both in religion and politics. 2. The objedt of our Lord’s miniftry, which is the great fubjedt of the gofpels, was to inculcate a doBrine and morality with which none of their fyftems perfectly coincided : befides, Being conftantly oppofed by all the great men, the greater part of his hiftory confifts of inftrudtions and dif- putes. 3. As it is occupied with what our Saviour faid and what he did, this makes two diftindtions of ftyle 4 1 SCR and manner ; that of our Saviour, and the facred pen¬ man’s. In their own ebaradter, they neither explain nor command, promife nor threaten, praife nor blame. They generally omit the names of our Lord’s enemies j thus diredting our hatred at the vices they committed, not at the perfons. They never mention fuch perfons wfithout neceftity ; which is the cafe with the high prieft, Pilate, Herod, and Judas : the three firft for the chro¬ nology, the fourth to do juftice to the eleven. Herodias is, indeed, mentioned with difhonour ; but her crime was a public one. On the other hand, all perfons diftinguifhed for any thing virtuous are careful¬ ly mentioned, Jofeph of Arimathea, Nicodemus, Zac- cheus, Bartimeus, Jairus, Lazarus, Mary, and Martha. They record their own faults (Peter’s, Thomas’s), nor do they make any merit of their confeffion. In one uniform ftrain they relate the molt fignal miracles and molt ordinary fadts. From the narrative is excluded that quality of ftyle which is called animation. Nothing that difeovers paf- fion in the writer, or is calculated to excite the paflions of the reader. Every thing is directed to mend the heart. But m the difeourfes and dialogues of our Saviour, the expreffion, without lofing any thing of its fimplicity, is often remarkable for fpirit and energy. Refpedting harmony and fmoothnefs, qualities which only add an external polifti to language, they had not the leaft foli- citude. As to elegance, there is an elegance which refults from the ufe of fuch words as are molt in ufe with thofe who are accounted fine writers, and from fuch arrangements in the words and claufes as have generally obtained their approbation. This is difclaimed by the facred authors. But there is an elegance of a fuperior order more nearly connected with the fentiment •, and in this fort of elegance they are not deficient. In all the oriental languages great ufe is made of tropes, efpecially meta¬ phors. When the metaphors employed bear a ftrong refemblance, they confer vivacity : if they be borrowed from objects which are naturally agreeable, beautiful, or attractive, they add alfo elegance. The Evangelifts furnifh us with many examples of this kind of vivacity and elegance. Our Lord borrows tropes from corn¬ fields, vineyards, gardens, &c. As a valuable appendage to this part of our fubject, we (hail fubjoin Dr Campbell’s method of ftudying the books of the New Teftament. This we offer to our readers as a beautiful inftanee of the judicious applica¬ tion of philofophy to facred ftudies. It is the fame method of difeovering truth by analyfis and induction, which was purfued by Sir Ifaac Newton with fuch afto- nilhing fuccefs, which fince his time has been uniformly praftifed in natural philofophy, and has been alfo ap¬ plied to chemiftry, to medicine, to natural hiltory, and to the philofophy of mind, by the ingenious Dr Reid. This is the path of found philofophy, which can alone lead to the difeovery of truth. In following it, our progrefs may be flow, but it Avill be lure. It all theolo¬ gians would fteadily adhere to it, we might then enter¬ tain the-pleafing hope of difearding for ever thofe abfurd fyftems of religion which are founded on tingle paffages and detached fragments of feripture, and of eftablithing opinions and doftrines on a folid foundation. . “ t. T» Script u re* 127 Proper me¬ thod of ftudying the Nrew Teftamert by analyfis and induo t on. SCR [2 Scripture. t: i. To get acquainted with each writer’s ftyle j to —' obferve his manner of compofition, both in fentences and C'am paragraphs; to remark the words and phrafes peculiar Ltll’/me- to him, and the peculiar application that he may fomc- thod. Prel.times make of ordinary words; for there are few of thofe Dif. to the writers who have not their peculiarities in all the re- Gofpels. fpe£ts now mentioned. This acquaintance with each can be attained only by the frequent and attentive reading of his works in his own language. “ 2. To inquire into the charafter, the fituation, and the office of the writer, the time, the place, and the occafion of his writing, and the people for whore imme¬ diate ufe he originally intended his work. Every one of thefe particulars will fometimes ferve to elucidate ex- preffions otherwife obfcure or doubtful. This knowledge may in part be learned from a diligent and reiterated perufal of the book itfelf, and in part be gathered from what authentic, or at leaf! probable, accounts have been tranfmitted to us concerning the compilement of the canon. 44 3. The laft general direction is, to confider the principal fcope of the book, and the particulars chiefly" obfervable in the method, by which the writer has pur- pofed to execute his defign. This diredtion is particu¬ larly applicable to the epirtolary writings, efpecially thofe of Paul. “4. If a particular word or phrafe occur, which ap¬ pears obfcure, perhaps unintelligible, the firlf thing we ought to do, if fatisfled that the reading is genuine, is to confult the context, to attend to the manner where¬ in the term is introduced, w'hether in a chain ofreafon- ing or in a hiftorical narration, in a defcription, or in¬ cluded in an exhortation or command. As the conclu- fion is inferred from the premiffes, or as from two or more known truths a third unknown or unobferved be¬ fore may fairly be deduced ; fo from fuch attention to the fentence in cor.neftion, the import of an exprefiion, in itfelf obfcure or ambiguous, will fometimes with mo¬ ral certainty be difcovered. This, however, will not always anfwer. “ 5. If it do not, let the fecond confideration be, whe¬ ther the term or phrafe be one of the writer’s peculia¬ rities. If fo, it comes naturally to be inquired, what is the acceptation in which he employs it in other places ? If the fenfe cannot be precifely the fame in the paflage under review, perhaps, by an eafy and natural metaphor or other trope, the common acceptation may give rife to one which perfedlly fuits the paflage in queflion.— llecourfe to the other places wherein the word or phrafe occurs in the fame author is of confiderable ufe, though the term ftiould not be peculiar to him. 44 6. But thirdly, if there fnould be nothing in the fame writer that can enlighten the place, let recourfe be had to the parallel paffages, if there beany fuch, in the other facred writers. By parallel paffages, I mean thofe places, if the difficulty occur in hillory, wherein the fame or a fimilar flory, miracle, or event, is related } if in teaching or reafoning, thofe parts wherein the fame argument or doflrine is treated, or the fame pa¬ rable propounded 5 and in moral leffons, thofe wherein the fame clafs of duties is recommended : or, if the dif¬ ficulty be found in a quotation from the Old Teftament, let the parallel paffage in the book referred to, both in the original Hebrew, and in the Greek verfion, be con- fulted. 3 ] SCR “ <7. Blit if in thefe there be found nothing that can Scripture, throw light on the expreflion of which we are in doubt, ~ i* the fourth recourfe is to all the places wherein the word or phrafe occurs in the New Teilament, and in the Sep- tuagint verfion of the Old, adding to thefe the confidera¬ tion of the import of the Hebrew or Chaldaic word, whofe place it occupies, and the extent of fignification, of which in different occurrences fuch Hebrew or Chal- daic term is fufceptible. “ 8. Perhaps the term in queflion is one of thofe which very rarely occur in the New Teflament, or thofe called Asyo^svss, only once read in Scripture, and not found at all in the tranflation of the Seventy. Se¬ veral fuch words there are. There is then a neceffity, in the fifth place, for recurring to the ordinary accep¬ tation of the term in claffical authors. This is one of thofe cafes wherein the interpretation given by the ear- lieft Greek fathers deferves particular notice. In this, however, I limit myfelf to thofe comments wherein they give a literal expofition of the facred text, and do not run into vifion and allegory.” 129 The manuferipts of the New Teftament are the na-Manu- tural fource from which the genuine readings of the^PP^^ Greek Teftament are to be drawn. The printed ecfi-xeftamen tions are either copies of more ancient editions, or of manuferipts 5 and they have no further authority than as they correfpond to the manuferipts from which they were originally taken. By manuferipts of the New Te¬ ftament, we mean thofe only which were written before the invention of printing. The moft ancient of thefe are loft, and there is no manufeript now extant older than the fixth century. Few' contain the whole New Teftament ; fome contain the four gofpels ; fome the Afts • f the Apoftles and Epiftles •, and others the book of Revelation. The greateft number are thofe which con¬ tain the firft part 5 thofe which have the fecond, or the firft and fucond together, are likewife numerous ; but thofe of the third are extremely fewr. It muft be added alfo, that in many manuferipts thofe epiftles are omitted whofe divine authority was formerly doubted. There are many manuferipts which have been exa¬ mined only for a fingle text, fuch as I John v. 7. or at lead for a very fmall number. Others have been exa¬ mined from the beginning to the end, but not com¬ pletely and in refpeft of all the readings. A third elafs confilts of fuch as either have been, or are faid to have been, completely and accurately collated. But this re¬ quires fuel) phlegmatic patience, that we can hardly ex¬ pert to find in critical catalogues all the various read¬ ings which have been only once collated. Wetftein, in collating many manuferipts anew, made difeoveries which had entirely efcaped the notice of his predectffors. The fourth clafs confifts of fuch as have been com¬ pletely and accurately collated more than, once \ but here alfo we are in danger of being led into error.— When various readings are transferred from one critical edition to another, as from that of Gregory to Mill’s edition, and from the latter to thofe of Bengel and Wetftein, the manuferipts muft fometimes be falfely named, and various readings muft frequently be omit¬ ted. And as Wetftein has marked by ciphers manu¬ feripts that in former editions had been denoted by their initial letters, he could fcareely avoid fubflituting, in fome cafes, one figure inflead of another. The fifth clafs, which is by far the moft valuable, confifts of fuch as have SCR [ H ] SCR Scripture, have been printed word for word, and therefore form an 1 '' original edition of the Greek Teilament. We can boall: but of a very few manufcripts of this kind. Hearne printed at Oxford, in 1715, the A6ls of the Apoftlesin Greek and Latin from the Codex Laudianus 3.5 Knit- tel has annexed to his edition of Ulphilas, p. 53—1x8, a copy of two very ancient fragments preferved in the library of Wolfenbuttle ; the one of the four Gofpels in general, the other of St Luke and St John. Woide printed in 1786 the Codex Alexandrinus, a manufcript of great antiquity, which fhall afterwards be more fully defcribed ^ and the univerlity of Cambridge has refolved to publilh, in a limilar manner, the Cod. Cant. I. or, as it is fometimes called, the Codex Bezae, the care of which is intrufted to Dr Kipling, a publica¬ tion which will be thankfully received by every friend to facred criticifm. It was the intention of the Abbe Spoletti, a few years ago, to publilh the whole of the celebrated Codex Vaticanus j which would likewife have been a moft valuable acceflion, fince a more important manufcript is hardly to be found in all Europe. He delivered for this purpofe a memorial to the pope ; but the defign was not put into execution, either becaufe the pope refufed his affent or the abbe abandoned it himfelf. See the Oriental Bible, vol. xxii. N°333. and vol. xxiii. N° 348. “ A very valuable library,” fays Michaelis, “ might be compofed of the impreflions of ancient manufcripts, of taking an though too expenfive for a private perfon, fhould be admitted into every univerlity colleddion, efpecially the Alexandrian and Cambridge manufcripts, to which I would add, if it were now poflible to procure it, Hearne’s edition of the Codex Laudianus 3. A plan of this fort could be executed only in England, by a private fubfcription, where a zeal is frequently difplay- ed in literary undertakings that is unknown in other countries j and it were to be wilhed that the project were begun before length of time has rendered the ma¬ nufcripts illegible, and the attempt therefore fruitlefs. Ten thoufand pounds would go a great way towards the fulfilling of this requelt, if the learned themfelves did not augment the difficulty of the undertaking, by adding their own critical remarks, and endeavouring thereby to recommend their publications, rather than by prefenting to the public a faithful copy of the original. Should pollerity be put in poffeffion of faithful impreffions of important manufcripts, an acquifition which would render the higheft fervice to facred criticifm, all thefe editions of the New Teftament ffiould be regulated on the fame plan as Hearne’s edition of the A£ts of the Apoftles.” It muft be highly flattering to the patrio¬ tic fpirit of an Engliffiman to hear the encomiums which learned foreigners have fo profufely bellowed on our li¬ berality in fupporting works of genius and learning and public utility. The plan which Michaelis propofes 130 Michaelis’s propofal impreffion of ancient manu¬ fcripts, •vol. ii. p. 182. to us, in preference to all the other nations in Europe, Scripture, is noble and magnificent, and would certainly confer 1"" "V ■ immortality on thofe men who would give it their pa¬ tronage and affiltance. There are many ancient manufcripts, efpecially in Italy, which have never been collated, but lie Hill unex¬ plored. Here is a field where much remains to be done. See Marlh’s Notes to Michaelis, vol. ii. p. 643. Michaelis has given a catalogue of ancient manufcripts, amounting in number to 292, to which he has added a ffiort account of each. In this place we fhall confine our obfervations to the moft celebrated, the Alexan¬ drian and Vatican manufcripts, which we have chiefly extracted from Michaelis. The Alexandrian manufcript confifts of four volumes j Acc^t of the firft three of which contain the Old Teftament, the the Adexan- fourth the New Teftament, together with the firft Epi-drian ma- ftle of Clement to the Corinthians, and a fragment of the nulcr*Pt- fecond. In the New Teftament, which alone is the ob¬ ject of our prefent inquiry, is wanting the beginning as far as Matthew xxv. 6. a j likewife from John vi. 50. to viii. 52. and from 2 Cor. iv. 13. to xii. 7. It muft likewife be obferved, that the Pfalms are pre¬ ceded by the epiftle of Athanafius to Marcellinus, and followed by a catalogue, containing thofe which are to be ufed in prayer for each hour, both of the day and of the night; alfo by 14 hymns, partly apocryphal, partly biblical, the nth of which is an hymn in praife of the Virgin Mary, entitled tjjj S-utoxx : fur¬ ther, the Hypothefes Eufebii are annexed to the Pfalms, and his Canones to the Gofpels. It is true, that this has no immediate reference to the New Teftament, but may have influence in determining the antiquity of the manufcript itfelf. It has neither accents nor marks of afpiration ; it is written with capital, or, as they are called, uncial let¬ ters, and has very few abbreviations. There are no in¬ tervals between the words ; byt the fenfe of a paflage is fometimes terminated by a point, and fometimes by a vacant fpace. Here arifes a fufpicion that the copyift did not underftand Greek, becaufe thefe marks are fometimes found even in the middle of a word, for in- ftance Levit. v. 4. ttvcpos y for ecu opoa-y, and Numb. xiii. 29. pu Yiryf. This manufcript was prefented to Charles I. in 1628, by Cyrillus Lucaris patriarch of Conftantinople. Cy- rillus himfelf has given the following account: “ We know fo much of this manufcript of the holy writings of the Old and New Teftament, thatThecla an Egyptian lady of diftinftion (nobillsfcemina JEgyptia') wrote it with her own hand 1300 years ago (a).” She lived foon after the council of Nice. Her name was formerly at the end of the book ; but when Chriftianity was fubvert- ed in Egypt by the errors of Mahomet, the books of the Chriftians fuffered the fame fate, and the name of Thecla (a) He wrote this in the year 1628. According to this account, then, the manufcript muft have been written in 328 ; a date to which fo many weighty objefb’ons may be made, that its moft ftrenuous advocates will hardly undertake to defend it. But this error has furniffied Oudin with an opportunity of producing many arguments againft the antiquity of the Codex Alexandrinus, which feem to imply, that Grabe and others, who have referred it to the fourth century, fuppofe it to have been written in the above-mentioned year. Now it is probable, that the inference which has been deduced from the account of Cyrillus is more than he himfelf intended to exprefs, as be relates that Thecla lived after the council of Nice. SCR t Scripture. Thecla was expunged. But oral tradition of no very “ '' ancient date {mamria et tradhio recens') has preferved the remembrance of it. But the reader will fee that this account is merely traditional. Dr Semler very properly obferves, that there is no more reafon to rely on a tradition refpeding the tranfcriber of an ancient manufcript, than on a tra¬ dition which relates to an ancient relic. The argu¬ ments which have been urged by Wetftein, Semler, Oudin, and Woide, to fix the date of this manufcript, are fo many, that it would be tedious to repeat them. But, after all, its antiquity cannot be determined with certainty, though it appears from the formation of the letteVs, which referable thofe of the fourth and fifth cen- 25 1 then follow the Epiftles of St Paul, SCR but not in the Scripture. ufual order j for the Epiftle to the Hebrews is pla- ced immediately after thofe to the 1 heffalonians: and it is not improbable, that in the more ancient manu- fcript, from which the Codex Vaticanus was copied, this Epiftle was even placed before that to the Ephefians, and immediately after the Epiitle to the Galatians (b)j for the Epiftles of St Paul are divided into 93 fec- tions by figures written in the margin with red ink j but the Epiftle to the Galatians ends with 39, and that to the Ephefians begins with 70 *, the Epiftle to the Hebrews, on the contrary, begins with 60, and ends with 69. With the words ccpapav tcw ©sw, Heb. ix. 14. the manufcript ceafes, the remaining leaves being loft. turies, and the want of accents, that it was not written * There is wanting, therefore, not only the latter part oi 13a Account of the Va- dean ma¬ nufcript. fo late as the tenth century. In this century it placed by Oudin, while Grabe and Schulze have refer¬ red it to the fourth, which is the very utmoft period that can be allowed, becaufe it contains the epiftles of Athanafius. Wetftein, with more probability, has cho- fen a mean between thefe two extremes, and referred it to the fifth century: but we are not juftified in drawing this inference from the information of the letters alone, for it is well known that the fame mode of forming the letters was retained longer in fome countries and in fome monafteries than in others. We are now in poffeflion of a perfect impreflion of this manufcript, which is accompanied with fo complete and fo critical a colleftion of various readings, as is hardly to be expected from the edition of any other manufeript. Dr Woide publifhed it in 1786, with types call for that purpofe, line for line, without intervals be¬ tween the words, as in the manufcript itfelf: the copy is fo perfeft a refemblance of the original, that it may fupply its place. Its title is Novum Tejiamentum Gra-- cum e codice MS. Alexandrino qui Londini in Bibliotheca Mufei Britannici ajjervatur deferiptum. It is a very fplendid folio *, and the preface of the learned editor con¬ tains an accurate defeription of the manufcript, with an exa£I lift of all its various readings, that takes up no lefs than 89 pages j and each reading is accompanied with a remark, in which is given an account of what his predecelfors Juninus, Walton, Fell, Mill, Grabe, and Wetftein, had performed or neglefted. The Vatican manufcript contained originally the whole Greek Bible, including both the Old and New Teftament j and in this refpedt, as well as in regard to its antiquity, it refembles none fo much as the Codex Alexandrinus, but no two manuferipts are more diffi- milar in their readings, in the New Teftament as well as in the Old. After the Gofpels, which are placed in the ufual order, come the Afts of the Apoftles, which are immediately followed by the feven catholic epiftles. This muft be particularly noted, becaufe fome have con¬ tended that the fecond Epiftle of St Peter, with the fecond and third of St John, were wanting. Profeffor Hwiid, in a letter dated Rome, April 12. 1781, affu- red Michaelis that he had feen them with his own eyes, that the fecond Epiftle of St Peter is placed folio 1434, the fecond of St John fol. 1442, the third fol. 1443 : Vol. XIX. Part I. this Epiftle, but the Epiftles to Timothy, Titus, and Philemon, with the Revelation of St John : but this laft book, as well as the latter part of the Epiftle to thei Hebrews, has been fupplied by a modern hand in the 15th century. In many places the faded letters have been alfo retouched by a modern, but careful hand} and when the perfon who made thefe amendments, who appears to have been a man of learning, found a read¬ ing in his own manufcript which differed from that of the Codex Vaticanus, he has noted it in the margin, and has generally left the text itfelf untouched, though in fome few examples he has ventured to erafe it. It is certain, that this manufcript is of very high an¬ tiquity, though it has been difputed which of the two in this refpeft is entitled to the preference, the Vatica¬ nus or Alexandrians. The editors of the Roman edi¬ tion of the Septuagint, in 1587, referred the date of the Vatican manufcript to the fourth century, the pe¬ riod to which the advocates for its great rival refer the Code% Alexandrinus. More moderate, and perhaps more accurate, are the fentiments of that great judge of an¬ tiquity Montfaucon, Avho, in his Bibliotheca Bibhothe- carum, p. 3. refers it to the fifth or fixth century j and adds, that though he had feen other manuferipts of equal antiquity, he had found none at the fame time fo complete. The Codex Vaticanus has a great refemblance to the manuferipts noted by Wetftein, C. D. L. 1. 13. 33. 69. 102. and to the Latin, Coptic, and Ethiopic ver- fions } but it is preferable to moft of them, in being al- moft entirely free from thofe undeniable interpolations and arbitrary corrections which are very frequently found in the above-mentioned manuferipts, efpecially in D. 1. and 69. It may be applied, therefore, as a mean not only of confirming their genuine readings, but of detecting and correcting thofe that are fpurious. It is written with great accuracy, and is evidently a faithful copy of the more ancient manufcript from which it was tranferibed. Peculiar readings, or fuch as are found neither in other manuferipts nor ancient verfions, are feldom difeovered in the Codex Vaticanus', and of the few which have been aCtually found, the greateft part are of little importance. But in proportion as the number of fuch readings is fmall, the number of thofe is great j in fupport of which few only, though ancient D authorities, (b) Probably becaufe the Epiftle to the Hebrew's, as well as the Epiftle to the Galatians, relates to the aboli¬ tion of the Mofaic law. SCR [2 Saiphut.. authorities, have been hitherto produced : But this manuicript has not throughout the whole New Tefta- ment the lame uniform text. As we have now a beautiful printed edition of the Alexandrian manufcript by Dr Woide, it is much to He wifhed that we had alfo an exadt impreffion of the \ atican manufcript. From the fuperilitious fears and intolerant ipirit of the inquifition at Rome, all accefs to this manufcript was refufed to the Abbe Spoletti, who pi-efented a memorial for that purpofe. Unlefs the pope interpofe his authority, rve mull therefore defpair of having our withes gratified 5 but from the liberality of fentiment which the head of the Catholic church has fhown on feveral occafions, rve hope that the period is not tar ddlant when the Vatican library will be open to the learned, and when the pope will think it his great- eft honour to encourage their refearches. 1 he molt valuable editions of the Greek New' Tefta- ment are thofe of Mill, Bengel, and Wetftein. The edition of Mill, which was only finiftied 14 days I33 The belt editions of the Greek New Tefta- ment are thofe of Mill, before his death, occupied the attention of the author for 30 years. The collections of various readings which had been made before the time of Mill, the Velefian, the Barbe- rini, thofe of Stephens, the London Polyglot, and Fell’s edition, with thofe which the bifhop had left in manu¬ fcript, and whatever he was able to procure elfewhere, he brought together into one large colledtion. He made likewife very coniiderable additions to it. Fie collated feveral original editions more accurately than had been done before : he procured extracts from Greek manu- fcripts which had never been collated ; and of fuch as had been before collated, but not with fuffieient atten¬ tion, he obtained more complete extra&s. It is faid that he has colle&ed from manuferipts, fathers, and ver- ftons, not fewer than 30,000 various readings. This col- leftion, notwithftanding its many imperfedlions, and the fuperxority of that of Wetftein, is ftill abfolutely ne- ceflary to every critic : for Wetftein has omitted a great number of readings which are to be found in Mill, ef- pecially thofe which are either taken from the Vulgate, or confirm its readings. Mill was indeed too much at¬ tached to this verfton j yet he cannot be accufed of par¬ tiality in producing its evidence, becaufe it is the duty of a critic to examine the witnefles on both Tides of the queftion : and Wetftein, by too frequently negledl- ing the evidence in favour of the Vulgate, has rendered his colledtion lefs perfedt than it would otherwife have been. He likewife added, as far as he was able, read¬ ings from the ancient verfions •, and is much to be com¬ mended for the great attention which he paid to the quotations of the fathers ; the importance of which he had fagacity enough to difeern. It cannot, however, be denied, that Mill’s Greek Te- ftament has many imperfedtions, and fome of real im¬ portance. His extradts from manuferipts often are not only incomplete, but erroneous ; and it is frequently ne- eeflary to corredf his miftakes from the edition of Wet¬ ftein. Flis extradls from the oriental verfions are alfo imperfedi, becaufe he wTas unacquainted with thefe lan¬ guages •, and in feledting readings from the Syriac, the Arabic, and Ethiopic, he was obliged to have recourfe to the Latin tranflations, which are annexed to thofe verfions in the London Polyglot. ] S C R _ The great diligence which Mill had ftiown in collec- Scripture, ting fo many various readings, alarmed the clergy as if""V— the Chriftian religion had been in danger of fubverfion. It gave occafion tor a time to the triumphs of the deift, and expofed the author to many attacks. But it is now univerfally known, that not a fingle article of the Chriftian religion would be altered though a deift were allowed to feledt out of Mill’s 30,000 readings what¬ ever he ftiould think moft inimical to tlxe Chriftian caufe. I734> Bengel abbot of Alpirfpach, in the duchy penc^f of Wurtemburg, publiftied a new edition of the Greek Teftament. The fears which Mill had excited began to fubfide on this new publication j for Bengel was univerfally efteemed a man of piety. Bengel was not only diligent in the examination of various readings, but in the ftridteft fenfe of the word confeientious 5 for he conftdered it as an offence againft the Deity, if, through his own fault, that is, through levity or care- leffnefs, he introduced a falfe reading into the facred text. His objedt was not merely to make a collection of readings, and leave the choice of them to the judge¬ ment of the reader, but to examine the evidence on both fides, and draw7 the inference } yet he has not given his own opinion fo frequently as Mill, whom he refemblcd in his reverence for the Latin vtrfion, and in the pre¬ ference which he gave to harfft and difficult readings, before thofe which were fmooth and flowing. It may be obferved in general, that he was a man of profound learning, and had a cool and lound judgment, though it did not prevent him from thinking too highly of the Latin readings, and of the Codex Alexandrinus, with other Latinizing manuferipts. The imperfedtions of Bengel’s edition arife chiefly from his diffidence and caution. He did not venture to infert into the text any reading which had not al¬ ready appeared in fome printed edition, even though he believed it to be the genuine reading. In the book of Revelation indeed he took the liberty to infert read¬ ings which had never been printed; becaufe few manu¬ feripts had been ufed in the p inting of that book. The celebrated edition of John James Wetftein, ^(jofyget which is the moft important of all, and the moft necef-fteiic C * fary to thofe engaged in facred criticifm, was publiftied at Amfterdain in 1751 and 1752, in tw'o volumes folio. No man will-deny that Wetfteih’s Prolegomena difeover profound erudition, critical penetration, and an intimate acquaintance with the Greek manuferipts. It is a work which in many refpe&s has given a new turn to facred criticifm, and no man engaged in that ftudy can dif- penfe with it. Wherever Wetftein has delivered his fentiments refpedting a Greek manufcript, which he has done lefs frequently than Mill, and indeed lefs frequently than w'e could have wiffied, he ftiows himfelf an experienced and fagacious critic. He is likewife more concife than Mill in delivering his opinion, and does not fupport it by producing fo great a number of readings from tbe manufcript in queftion. This concifenefs is the confequence of that warmth and halte which were peculiar to Wetftein’s charadler, and which have fometimes given birth to miftakes. The fire of his difpofition was likewife the caufe of his advancing conjedtures, in regard to the hiftory of his manuferipts, which exceed the bounds of probability. But the cri- tiesd, SCR [ 27 ] SCR Sc-rlptoe. tical rules which he has delivered are perfe&ly juft ; and in this refpeft there is a remarkable agreement between him and his eminent predeceflors Mill and Bengel. In regard to the Latin verfion alone they appear to differ : in Mill and Bengel it has powerful, and per¬ haps partial, advocates j but in Wetftein a fevere and fagacious judge, who fometimes condemns it without a caufe. The Greek manufcripts which confirm the read¬ ings of the Vulgate, and which he fuppofed had been corrupted from it, he of courfe condemned with equal feverity : and fome colle£iions of various readings which had been made by Catholics, he made no fcruple to pronounce a forgery, faying, “ Tuneo Danaos et dona ferentes." But in confequence of his antipathy to the Vulgate, his colle£lion of various readings is lefs perfect than it might have been. It has been alked, 1. Whether he has quoted his manufcripts either falfely or imperfedlly, in order to eftablilh his own religious opinions ? or, 2. Whether his diligence and accuracy have been fuch that we may at ail times depend upon them ? To the firft of thefe quef- tions there can be no other anfwer, than that Wetftein, in his chara&er of a critic, is perfectly honeft. With refpedl to the fecond, his diligence and accuracy, Mi- ehaelis thinks there is lefs reafon to pronounce him faultlefs. But Mr Marfti has examined the examples on which Michaelis founds his affertion, and declares that Michaelis is miftaken in every one of them. The diligence of Wetftein can fcarcely be queftioned by any who are acquainted with his hiftory. He tra¬ velled into different countries, and examined with his own eyes a much greater number of manufcripts than any of his predeceffors. His colleflion of various read¬ ing amounts to above a million; and he has not only produced a much greater quantity of matter than his predeceffors, but has likewife corrected their miftakes, The extracts from manufcripts, verfionfe, and printed editions of the Greek Teftament, which had been quoted by Mill, are generally quoted by Wetftein. Whenever Wetftein had no new extradls from the ma¬ nufcripts quoted by Mill, or had no opportunity of ex¬ amining them himfelf, he copied literally from Mill; but wherever Mill has quoted from printed editions, as from the margin of Robert Stephens’s for inftance, or from the London Polyglot, Wetftein did not copy from Mill, but went to the original fource, as appears from his having correfted many miftakes in Mill’s quo¬ tations. In the opinion of Michaelis, there are many defedls in the edition of Wetftein, which require to be fupplied, and many errors to be qorreded. Yet ftill it mull be allowed to be a work of immenfe labour, and moft valu¬ able to thofe engaged in facred criticifm 5 and it is fur- prifing, when we confider the difficulties and labour which Wetftein had to encounter, that his errors and impefiedlions are fo few. The propofal of Michaelis, however, of a new col¬ lation of manufcripts, in order to form a complete col¬ lection of various readings, is worthy the attention of the learned. In mentioning this propofal, Michaelis turns a wifhfal eye towards Britain, the only country, he fays, which poffeffes the will and the means to exe¬ cute the talk. Should a refolution, he adds, be formed in this ifland, fo happily fituated for promoting the purpofes of general knowledge, to make the under- Scripture, taking a public concern, to enter into a fubfeription, ~‘ and to employ men of abilities in collating manufcripts both at home and abroad, they would be able to do more in ten years than could otherwife be done in a century. And could tiff s nation direCl its attention to any objeCl more glorious or more ufeful than in afeertaining the text of the facred Scriptures, and giving to pofterity an accurate edition ? jj# As the fenfe of Scripture, as well as all other books, PunClua- is affeCled by the punCtuation, it is of importance to de-t,on •h* • 1.1 /u o • » 1 • u c j • NewTefta- termine whether the ftops or points which we find mlcent the facred books were ufed by the facred writers, or have been inferted by modern tranferibers. We are told by Montfaucon, in his Faheagraphia Greeca, p. 31. that the perfon who firft diftinguilhed the feveral parts of a period in Greek writing, by the introduction of a point, was Ariftophanes of Byzantium, who lived under Ptolemseus Epiphanes, in the 145th Olympiad. But though points ivere not ufed in books before this period, they were employed in inferiptions above 400 years before the birth of Chrift. See Mont. Pal. Grcec. p. 1 q 5. Under the article Punctuation we mentioned, on authority which we reckoned unqueftionable, that the ancient manufcripts were written without any points. We have now, however, drfeovered, from Woide’s edi¬ tion of the Codex Alexandrians, that points are ufed in that manufeript, though omitted in the facJimile given by Montfaucon. That they are found too in the Codex Vaticanus, though not frequently, is related by Birch in his Prolegomena, p. 14. As the fad has not been generally known, that the ancients pointed their marrtiferipts, and as it is an im¬ portant and interefting faCt, we fliall prefent our readers with the firft fix lines of St John’s Gofpel, as they are pointed in the Alexandrian manufeript: ENAPXHHNOAOrOSKAIOAOrOSHN nPOSTONQN KAI0SHNOAOFO2’ OTTOEHNENAFXHriPOSTONeN ITANTAAlAYTOYErENETO KAIXft PEISAYTOYErENETOOYAEEN- OrEFONENENAYTnznHHN- Whether any points for marking the fenfe were ufed by the apoftles, cannot be determined j but the points now in ufe have been invented fince. In the fourth century, Jerome began to add the com¬ ma and colon to the Latin verfion ; and they were then inferted in many more ancient manufcripts. In the fifth century, Euthalius a deacon of Alexandria divided the New Teftament into lines. This divifion was re¬ gulated by the fenfe, fo that each line ended where feme paufe was to be- made in fpeaking. And w'hen a co- pyift was difpofed to contract his fpace, and therefore crowded the lines into each other, he then placed a point where Euthalius had terminated the line. In the eighth century, the ftroke was invented which we call a comma. In the Latin manufcripts, Jerome’s points were introduced by Paul Warnfried and Alcuin, at the command of Charlemagne. In the ninth cen¬ tury, the Greek note of interrogation (•,) was firft .ufed. At the invention of printing the editors placed the U 2 points 137 Divifion into chap ters. SCR [28 Scripture.^ points arbitrarily, probably without bellowing the ne- ^ ceffary attention •, and Stephens, in particular, varied his points in every edition (d). The meaning of many paflages in the Scripture has been altered by falfe pointing. We lhall produce one inllance of this: Mat. v. 34. is commonly pointed in this manner, iy*» ?£ Myu vfuv, ^ opoa-ea oA»s’ sv ru ugxico, and confequently tranllated, “ But I fay unto you, fwear not at all.” But if, inlfead of the colon placed after oXvs, we fublfitute a comma, the tranllation will be, “ But I fay to you that you ought by no means to fwear, either by heaven, for it is his throne, or by earth, for it is his footftool.” The command of Chrift therefore applies particularly to the abufe of oaths among the Pharifees, who on every trivial occafion fwore by the heaven, the earth, the temple, the head, &c. but it implies no prohibition to take an oath in the name of the Deity on folemn and important occa- fions. The ancients divided the New Tellament into two kinds of chapters, fome longer and fome {hotter. This method appears to be more ancient than St Jerome, for he expunged a palfage from the New Teftament, which makes an entire chapter. The longer kind of chapters were called breves, the fhorter capitula. St Matthew contained, according to Jerome, 68 breves $ Mark con¬ tained 48 ; Luke 83 •, and John 18. All the evange- lills together conlifted of 2x7 breves and 1126 capitula. The inventor of our modern divilion into chapters was Hugo de S. Caro, a French Dominican friar, who lived in the 13th century. The ancients had two kinds of verfes, one of which they called and the other ^n/xxTx. The remata were lines which contained a certain number of letters, like our printed books, and therefore often broke off in the middle of a word. Jofephus’s 20 books of Antiqui¬ ties contained 60,000 of them, though in Ittiquis’s edi¬ tion there are only 40^000 broken lines. Stichi were lines meafured by the fenfe : according to an ancient written lift mentioned by Father Simin, there were in the New Teftament 18,612 of thefe. The verfes into which the New Teftament is now divided are more modern, and an imitation of the di¬ vifion of the Old Teftament. Robert Stephens, the firft inventor, introduced them in his edition in the year ] SCR . .'S8 Divifion m to veifes, I55I\ made this divifion on a journey from Lyons Scripture, to Paris ; and, as his fon Henry tells us in the preface *■■■—y— to the Concordance of the New Teftament, he made it inter eqmtandum. This phrafe probably means, that when he was weary of riding, he amufed himfelf with this work at his inn. ^ i his invention of the learned printer was foon intro- Its difad- duced into all the editions of the New Teftament; and vantages* it muft be confefled, that in confulting and quoting the Scriptures, and in framing concordances for them, a fub- divilion into minute parts is of the greateft utility. But all the purpofes of utility could furely have been gain¬ ed, without adopting the hafty and indigefted divifion of Stephens, which often breaks the fenfe in pieces, renders plain paflages obfcure, and difficult pafiages un¬ intelligible. To the injudicious divifion of Stephens we may afcribe a great part of the difficulties which attend the interpretation of the New Teftament, and a great many of thofe abfurd opinions which have dif- graced the ages of the Reformation. For as feparate verfes appear to the eyes of the learned, and to the minds of the unlearned, as fo many detached fentences, they have been fuppofed to contain complete fenfe, and they have accordingly been explained without any re¬ gard to the context, and often in direift oppofition to it; _ Were any modern hiftory or continued difcourfe divided into fragments with as little regard to the fenfe, we ftiould foon find, that as many oppofite meanings could be forced upon them as have been forced upon the books of the New Teftament. The divifion into verfes has been ftill more injurious to the Epiftles than to the Gofpels, for there is a clofe connexion between the different parts of the Epiftles, which the verfes en¬ tirely diflolve. It is therefore to be wiffied that this divifion into verfes were laid afide. The Scriptures ought to be divided into paragraphs, according to the fenfe ; and the figures ought to be thrown into the mar¬ gin. In this way, the figures will retain their utility without their difadvantages. Dr Campbell, in his beautiful tranllation of the Gofpels, has adopted this method with great judgment and fuccefs ; and he who will read that tranllation, will perceive that this fingle alteration renders the Gofpels much more intelligible, and, we may add, more entertaining (e). The word EYAITEAION fignifies any joyful tidings, Me^°g of and the word GofpeU (d) The reader will perceive that the account of the origin of points is different from that given under PuNC- iHJATiON. But the beft authors differ upon this fubjett. We lhall perhaps reconcile the difference, byfuppofing t hat points were invented at the time here mentioned, but were not in general ufe till the time mentioned under the article Punctuation. (e) We lhall here fubjoin, as a curiofity, what the anonymous author terms the Old and New Tejlament diffeB- ed. It contains an enumeration of all the books, chapters, verfes, words, and letters, which occur in the Englilh Bible and Apocrypha. It is faid to have occupied three years of the author’s life, and is a Angular inftance of the trilling employments to which fuperftition has led mankind. Books in the Old Chapters Verfes Words Letters The Old and New Testament differed. 39 in the New - 27 Total 929 - - - 260 23,214 - - - 7959 59M39 - - - 181,253 ' 2,728,100 - - - 838,380 - ' 66 1189 3M73 773,692 3,566,480 Apocryph. Chapters 183 Verfes 6081 Words 152,185 I The SCR [ 29 ] SCR Scripture 141 Gofpel ac¬ cording to St Mat¬ thew. 142 It# authen¬ ticity. * Hift. lib. vi. cap. 35. and exactly correfponds to our Englifh tvord Gospel. In the New Teftament this term is confined to “ The glad tidings of the coming of the IV[effiah.,1 Thus, in Mat. xi. 5. our Lord fays, “ The poor have the Gofpel preached that is, The coming of the Mefliah is preached to the poor. Hence the name of Gofpel was given to the hiftories of Chrift, in which the good news of the coming of the Meffiah, with all its joyful circum- ftances, are recorded. That the Gofpel according to Matthew -was compo- fed, fays Dr Campbell, by one born a Jew, familiarly acquainted with the opinions, ceremonies, and cuftoms of his countrymen •, that it was compofed by one con- verfant in the facred writings, and habituated to their idiom 5 a man of plain fenfe, but of little or no learning, except what he derived from the Scriptures of the Old Teftament} and finally, that it was the production ef a man who -wrote from conviction, and had attended clofely to the faCts and fpeeches which he related, but who in writing entertained not the moft diftant view of fetting off himfelf—we have as ftrong internal evi¬ dence as the nature of the thing will admit, and much ftronger than that wherein the mind ninety-nine cafes out of a hundred acquiefces. That the author of this hiftory of our bleffed Savi¬ our was Matthew, appears from the teftimony of the early Chriftians. It is attefted by Jerome, Auguftin, Epiphanius, and Chryfoftom, and in fuch a manner‘as fhews that they knew the faCl to be uncontroverted, and judged it to be uncontrovertible. Origen, who flouriftied in the former part of the 3d century, is alfo refpeftable authority. He is quoted by Eufebius in a chapter * wherein he fpecially treats of Origen’s account of the facred canon. “ As I have learned (fays Ori¬ gen) by tradition concerning the four gofpels, which alone are received without difpute by the whole church of God under heaven ; the firft was written by Mat¬ thew, once a publican, afterwards an apoftle of Jefus Chrift, ijoho delivered it to theJewifh believers, compofed in the Hebrew language^ In another place he fays, “ Matthew Avriting for the Hebrews Avho expefted him who Avas to defcend from Abraham and David, fays the lineage of Jefus Chrift, fon-of David, fon of Abra- Scripture, ham.” It muft be obferved, that the Greek Avord' ^ 7rct%xtb>y an- Martyr fix times, by Irenaeus, and above forty times by chn‘ Clemens AleXandrinus. jgg The book Avhich Ave intitle the Adis of the Apoftles Ads of the connedts the gofpels and the epiftles. It is evidently a apoftles. continuation of Luke’s gofpel, which appeafs both from the introdudlion and from the atteftations of ancient Chriftians. Both are dedicated to Theophilus ; and in the beginning of the Adis a reference is made to his gofpel, which he calls a former treatife, recording the adlions and difeourfes of Jefus till his afeenfion to hea¬ ven. Luke is mentioned as the author of the Adis of the Apoftles by Irenseus, by Tertullian, by Origen, and Eufebius. From the frequent ufe of the firft perfon plural, it is manifeft that Luke the author Avas prefent at many e£ E tire (f) It has been argued from a paffage in this gofpel, that it muft have been Avritten before the deftrudtion of Jerufalem. In fpeaking of the pool of Bethefda, John ufes the prefent tenfe : His Avords are, “ Ihere is at Jefu- falem.” Noav if thefe Avords had been Avritten after the deftrudtion of Jerufalem, it is urged the pad tenfe Avolild have been ufed, and not the prefent. This argument is more fpecious than forcible. Though Jerufalem Avas dt- molilhed, does it fttloAV that the pool of BethefdaAvas dried up ? Scripture. 169 Contents of that book. 170 Often cited by the ear¬ ly Chrifti- ans. I7 * The epif- tles. 172 General plan of them. *73 Arranged in chrono¬ logical or¬ der. SCR [3+ t!ie tranfaftions which he relates. He appears to have accompanied Paul from Troas to Philippi. He attend¬ ed him alfo to Jerufalem, and afterwards to Rome, where he remained for two years. He is mentioned by Paul in feveral of thofe epiftles which were written from Rome, particularly in the 2d epiftle to Timothy, and in the epiftle to Philemon. This book contains the hiftory of the Chriftian church for the fpace of about 28 or 30 years, from the time of our Saviour’s afeenfion to Paul’s arrival at Rome in the year 60 or 61. As it informs us that Paul refided two years in Rome, it mull have been written after the year 63 ; and as the death of Paul is not mentioned, it is probable it was eompofed before that event, which hap¬ pened A. D. 65. The Adis of the Apoftles may be divided into feven parts. 1. The account of our Saviour’s afeenfion, and of the occurrences which happened on the firft Pente- coll after that event, contained in chap. i. ii. 2. The tranfadlions of the Chriifians of the circumcifion at Jerufalem, in Judea, and Samaria, chap. iii.—ix. xi, i — 2i. xii. 3. Tranfadtions in Caefarea, and the admif- fion of the Gentiles, chap. x. 4. The firil circuit of Bar¬ nabas and Paul among the Gentiles', chap. xi. 22. xiii. xiv. 5. Erabaffy to Jerufalem, and the firft council held in that city, chap. xv. 6. Paul’s fecond journey, chap. xvi.—xxi. 7. His arreftment, trial, appeal to Caefar, and journey to Rome, chap. xxi. to the end of the book. The Adis of Apoftles are cited by Clemens Romanus, by Polycarp, by Jurtin Martyr, thirty times by Irenseus, and feven times by Clemens Alexandrinus. All the efiential dodfrines and precepts of the Chrif¬ tian religion were certainly taught by our Saviour him felf, and are contained in the gofpels. The epiftles may be confidered as commentaries on the dodfrines of the gofpel, addreffed to particular focieties, accommodated to their refpedtive fituations •, intended to refute the errors and falfe notions which prevailed among them, and to inculcate thofe virtues in which they were moft deficient. The plan on which thefe Letters are written is, firft, to decide the controverfy, or refute the erroneous notions which had arifen in the fociety to which the epiftle was addreffed : And, fecondly, to recommend thofe duties which their falfe dodlrines might induce them to negledl ; at the fame time inculcating in ge¬ neral exhortations the moft important precepts of Chrif¬ tian morality. Of the epiftles fourteen were written by St Paul. Thefe are not placed according to the order of tihae in which they were compofed, but according to the fup- pofed precedence of the focieties or perfons to whom they were addreffed. It will be proper, therefore, to exhibit here their chronological order according to Dr Lardner. A Table of St Paul's Eptstles, with the Places where, and times when, written, according to Dr Lardner. SCR Ep> fries 1 Thefialonians 2 Theflalonians Galatians { Places. Corinth Corinth Corinth or Ephefus Epiftles. I Corinthians 1 Timothy Titus 2 Corinthians Romans Ephefians 2 Timothy Philippians Coloflians Philemon Hebrews Places. Ephefus Macedonia C Macedonia \ or near it Macedonia Corinth Rome Rome Rome Rome Rome C Rome or £ Italy A. D. Swiptutc, the beginning of 53 -y——* bef. the end of about October about February about April about May bef. the end of bef. the end of bef. the end of ^j- in Spring of 56 57 58 61 61 62 62 62 63 A Table of the Catholic Epistles, and the Reve¬ lation, according to Dr Lardner. Epiftle. J ames The two epiftles of Peter I John 2d and 3d of John Jude Revelation Place. Judea ^ Rome Ephefus ^ Ephefus Unknown C Patmos or \ Ephefus f or beg. of A. D. 61 62 about y between i and } 64 80 80 90 64 or 65 95 or 96 *74 A. D. 52 52 1 near the end of 52 3 or beginning of 53 It is more difficult to underftand the epiftolary wri- Caufes of tings than the gofpels j the caufe of which is evident, their obfeu- Many things are omitted in a letter, or (lightly mention- nty- ed, becaufe fuppofed to be known by the perfon to whom it is addrefled. To a ftranger this will create much difficulty. The bufinefs about which St Paul wrote was certainly well known to his correfpondents •, but at this diftance of time we can obtain no information concern¬ ing the occafion of his writing, of the chara&er and circumftances of thofe perfons for whom his letters were intended, except what can be gleaned from the writings themfelves. It is no wonder, therefore, though many allufions ffiould be obfeure. Befides, it is evident from many paflages that he anfwers letters and queftions which his correfpondents had fent him. If thefe had been preferved, they would have thrown more light up¬ on many things than all the notes arid conjedlures of the commentators. The caufes of obfeurity which have been now men-Caufes of tioned are common to all the writers of the epiftles j obfeurity but there are fome peculiar to St Paul. 1. As he had PecilIiiff;t0 an acute and fertile mind, he feems to have written 3 with great rapidity, and without attending much to the common rules of method and arrangement. To this caufe we may aferibe his numerous and long parenthe- fes. In the heat of argument he fometimes breaks off abruptly to follow out fome new thought $ and when he has exhaufted it, he returns from his digreflion with¬ out informing his readers •, fo that it requires great at¬ tention to retain the connexion. 2. His frequent change of perfon, too, creates ambiguity : by the pronoun I he fometimes means himfelf j fometimes any Chriftian j fometimes a Jew, and fometimes any man. In ufing the pronoun we he fometimes intends himfelf 5 fome¬ times comprehends his companions j fometimes the apof¬ tles : SCR [ 35 ] SCR Scripture. t|es • at one time he alludes to the converted Jews, at another time to the converted Gentiles. 3. 1 here is a third caufe of obfcurity •, he frequently propofes ob- jeftions, and anfwers them without giving any formal intimation. i'liere are other difficulties which anfe from our uncertainty who are the perfons he is addret- fing, and what are the particular opinions and practices to which he refers. Fo thefe we may add two exter¬ nal caufes, which have increafed the difficulty of under- Handing the epiftles. X. The dividing them into chap¬ ters and verfes, which diffolves the conneftion of the parts, and breaks them into fragments. It Cicero’s 'epiftles had been fo disjointed, the reading of them would be attended with lefs pleafure and advantage, and with a great deal more labour. 2. We are accuftomed to the phrafeology of the epiftles from our infancy } but we have either no idea at all when we ufe it, or our idea of it is derived from the articles or fyftem which we have efpoufed. But as different lefts have arbitrary definitions for St Paul’s phrafes, we fhall never by fol¬ lowing them difeover the meaning of St Paul, who cer¬ tainly did not adjuft his phrafeology to any man’s fyf¬ tem. The beft plan of ftudying the epiftles is that which was propofed and executed by Mr Locke. This we fhall prefent to our readers in the words of that acute j-5 and judicious author. Mr Locke’s “ After I had found by long experience,^ that the plan of ftu- reading of the text and comments in the ordinary way See 2 Cor. ix. 1.—5. viii. and xiii. I. 1 St Paul’s firft Epiftle had wrought different effedls State of the among the Corinthians: many of them examined their Corinthian conduft ; they excommunicated the inceftuous man $ church. requefted St Paul’s return with tears •, and vindicated him and his office againft the falfe teacher and his ad¬ herents. Others of them ftill adhered to that adverfary 5 even mans of St Paul, exprefsly denied his apoftolic office, and even Scripture, furnifhed themfelves with pretended arguments from that " * ' 1 '' Epiftle. He had formerly promifed to take a journey from Ephefus to Corinth, thence to vifit the Macedo- and return from them to Corinth (2 Cor. i. 1 $■, 16.). But the unhappy ftate of the Corinthian church made him alter his intention (verfe 23.), fince he found he muft have treated them with feverity. Hence his adverfaries partly argued, I. That St Paul was irrefo- lute and unfteady, and therefore could not be a prophet: 2. The improbability of Ids ever coming to Corinth again, fince he was afraid of them. Such ivas the ftate of the Corinthian church when St Paul, after his depar¬ ture from Ephefus, having vifited Macedonia (Adlsxx. I.), received an account of the above particulars from Titus (2 Cor. vii. 5, 6.), and therefore ivrote them his fecond Epiftle about the end of the fame year, or the beginning of 58. ... xSS But to give a more diftindl view of the contents of view of this Epiftle : the con- l- The apoftle, after a general falutation, expreffes histert' grateful fenfe of the divine goodnefs; profeffing his con- "vo^ fidence in God, fupported by a fenfe of his own integri- F ty ; makes an apology for not having vifited the Corin¬ thians as he had intended, and vindicates himfelf from the charge of ficklenefs, (chap. i ). 2. He forgives the inceftuous man, whofe conduft had made fo deep an impreffion on the apoftle’s mind, that one reafon why he had deferred his journey to Co¬ rinth was, that he might not meet them in grief, nor till he had received advice of the effeftof his apoftolical admonitions. He mentions his anxiety to meet Titus at Troas, in order to hear of their welfare 5 exprefles his thankfulnefs to God for the fuccefs attending his miniftry, and fpeaks of the Corinthians as his cre¬ dentials, written by the finger of God, (chap. ii. iii. i.—6.). 3. He treats of the office committed to him of preaching the redemption •, and highly prefers it to preaching the law : to which probably his adverfaries had made great pretences. They had ridiculed his fuf- ferings •, which he fhows to be no difgrace to the go¬ fpel or its minifters ; and here he gives a ftiort abftrafk of the do£lrine he preaches, chap. iii. 6. v. to the -end). He expatiates with great copioufnefs on the temper with which, in the midft of afllictions and perfecutions, he and his brethren executed their important embaffy j and with great affection and tendernefs he exhorts them to avoid the pollution of idolatry, (chap. vi.). He en¬ deavours to win their confidence, by telling them how much he rejoiced in their amendment and welfare, and how forry he had been for the diftrefs which his necef- fary reproofs had occafioned, (chap. vii.). He then ex¬ horts them to make liberal contributions for the Chri¬ ftians in Judea. He recommends to them the example of the Macedonians, and reminds them of the benevo¬ lence of the Lord Jefus. He exprefles his joy for the readinefs of Titus to affift in making the colleftion-, and makes alfo honourable mention of other Chriftian bre¬ thren, whom he had joined with Titus in the fame com- miffion, chap. viii.). He then, with admirable addrefs, urges a liberal contribution, and recommends them to the divine bleffing, (chap. ix.). 4. Next he obviates fome reflexions which had been thrown SCR [ 39 ] SCR 189 Epiftle to the Gala¬ tians. Scripture, thrown on him for the mildnefs of his conduct, as if it ““’'■v had proceeded from fear. He afierts his apoftolical power and authority, cautioning his opponents againft urging him to give too fenfible demonftrations of it, (chap. x.). He vindicates himfelf againft the infinua- tions of fome of the Corinthians, particularly for having declined pecuniary fupport from the church ; an aftion which had been ungeneroufly turned to his difadvan- tage. To fttow his fuperiority over thole defigning men who had oppofed his preaching, he enumerates his fufferings *, gives a detail of fome extraordinary revela¬ tions which he had received ; and vindicates himfelf from the charge of boafting, by declaring that he had been forced to it by the defire of fupporting his apofto¬ lical charafter, (chap. xi. xii.). He clofes the Epiftle, by affuring them with great tendernefs how much it would grieve him to demonftrate his divine commiftxon by feverer methods. The Galatians were defcended from thofe Gauls who had formerly invadedt Greece, and afterwards fettled in Lower Afia. St Paul had preached the gofpel among them in the year 51, foon after the council held at Jeru- falem, (Afts xvi. 6.). Afia fwarmed at that time with zealots for the law of Mofes, who wanted to impofe it on the Gentiles, (Acfs xv. 1.). Soon after St Paul had left the Galatians, thefe falfe teachers had got among them, and wanted them to be circumcifed, &c. This occafionedthe following Epiftle, which Michaelis thinks was written in the fame year, before St Paul left Thef- falonica. Dr Lardner dates it about the end of the year 52, or in the very beginning of <13, before St Paul fet out to go to Jerufalem by way of Ephefus. The fubjeft of this Epiftle is much the fame with that of the Epiftle to the Romans •, only this queftion is more fully confidered here, “ Whether circumcifion, and an obfervance of the Levitical law, be neceffary to the falvation of a Chriftian convert ?” It appears, thefe Judaizing Chriftians, whofe indire£l views St Paul ex- pofes (Afts xv. I. Gal. v. 3, 9.), at firft only reprefen- ted circumcifion as neceflary to falvation *, but afterwards they infifted upon the Chriftians receiving the Jewifli feftivals, (Gal. iv. to.). As St Paul had founded the churches of Galatia, and inftrufled them in the Chriftian religion, he does not fet before them its principal doflrines, as he had done in the Epiftle to the Romans ; but referring them to what he had already taught (chap, i, 8, 9.), he proceeds at once to the fubjefl of the Epiftle. As it appears from feveral paffages of this Epiftle, particularly chapter i. 7, 8, 10. and chapter v. II. that the Judaizing Chriftians had endeavoured to perfuade the Galatians that Paul himfelf had changed his opi¬ nion, and now preached up the Levitical law •, he de¬ nies that charge, and affirms that the doctrines which he had taught were true, for he had received them from God by immediate revelation. He relates his miracu¬ lous converfion ; afierts his apoftolical authority, which had been acknowledged by the difciples of Jefus *, and, as a proof that he had never inculcated a compliance with the Mofaic law, he declares that he had oppofed Peter at Antioch for yielding to the prejudices of the Jews. Having now vindicated his charadler from the fufpi- eion of ficklenefs, and fhown that his commiffion was 190 The date 191 and con¬ tents of it. divine, he argues that the Galatians ought not to fub- Scripture;^ mit to the law of Mofes : 1. Becaufe they had received ^ the Holy Ghoft and the gift of miracles, not by the Arguments law, but by the gofpel, (chap. iii. 1—5.). 2. Becaufe by which the promifes which God made to Abraham were nottheapofUe reftrifted to his circumcifed defcendants, but extended to, all who are his children by faith, (chap. iii. 6—18.). Mopes was In anfwer to the objection, To what then ferveth M^not obliga- law ? he replies, That it was given becaufe of tranf- tory on the greffion j that is, to preferve them from idolatry till the Galatians. Meffiah himfelf ftiould come. 3.. Becaufe all men, Locke on ther Jews or Gentiles, are made the children of God by the Epi~ faith, or by receiving the Chriftian religion, and there- fore do not ftand in need of circumcifion, (chap. iii. 26 —29.). From the ift verfe of chap. iv. to the nth, he argues that the law was temporary, being only fitted for a ftate of infancy ; but that the world, having at¬ tained a ftate of manhood under the Meffiah, the law was of no farther ufe. In the remaining part of chap¬ ter iv. he reminds them of their former alfedlion to him, and affures them that he was ftill their fincere friend. He exhorts them to ftand faft in the liberty with which Chrift had made them free 5 for the fons of Agar, that is, thofe under the law given at Mount Sinai, are in bondage, and to be caft out 5 the inheritance being de- figned for thofe only who are the free-born fons of God under the fpiritual covenant of the gofpel. The apoftle next confutes the falfe report which had How he- beerr fpread abroad among the Galatians, that Paul vimlicatea himfelf preached up circumcifion. He had already in- dire&ly refuted this calumny by the particular account frorn fajfe which he gave of his life j but he now diredlly and afperfions. openly contradi£ls it in the following manner : 1. By alluring them, that all who thought circumci¬ fion necefiary to falvation could receive no benefit from the Chriftian religion, (chap. v. 2.-—4.). 2. By declaring, that he expefted juftification only by faith, (verfe 5, 6.). 3. By teftifying, that they had once received the truth, and had never been taught fuch falfe doftrines by him, (verfe 7, 8.). 4. By infinuating that they fliould pafs fome cenfure on thofe who mifled them (verfe 9, io.), by declaring that he was perfecuted for oppofing the ciroumcifion of - the Chriftians, (verfe 11.). 5. By expreffing a wifti that thofe perfons ffiould be cut off who troubled them wfith his do&rine. This Epiftle affords a fine inftance of Paul’s {kill in managing an argument. The chief objedlion which the advocates for the Mofaic law had urged againft him was, that he himfelf preached circumcifion. In the beginning of the Epiftle he overturns this fiander by a ftatement of fails, without taking any exprefs notice of it 5 but at the end fully refules it, that it might leave a ftrong and lafting impreffion on their minds. He next cautions them againft an idea which his ar¬ guments for Chriftian liberty might excite, that it con- fifted in licentioufnefs. He {hows them it does not confift in gratifying vicious defires; for none are un¬ der ftronger obligations to moral duties than the Chri¬ ftian. He recommends gentlenefs and meeknefs to the weak (chap vi. 1—5.), and exhorts them to be liberal to their teachers, and to all men (ver. 6—10.). He concludes f Setipture. 194 Epiftle to tha Ephefi- T9S The date T96 and defign of it. . *97 Epiftle to the Philip- pians. SCR concludes with expofing the falfe pretence daizing teachers, and afferting the integrity of his own conduit. Itphefus was the chief city of all Aha on this fide Mount Taurus. St Paul had palled through it in the year 54, but without making any Itay, (Acts xviii. 19 •—21.). The following year he returned to Ephefus again, and llaid there three years, (chap, xix.). Dur¬ ing his abode there he completed a very flourillung church of Chriftians, the firft foundations of which had been laid by fome inferior teachers. As Ephefus was frequented by perfons of dill in it ion from all parts of Alia Minor, St Paul took the opportunity of preach¬ ing in the ancient countries (ver. 10.) 5 and the other churches of Alia were confidered as the daughters of the church of Ephefus; fo that an Epiftle to the Ephe- fians was, in effeil, an epiftle to the other churches of Alia at the fame time. Dr Lardner (hows it to be highly probable that this epiftle was written in the year 61, foon after Paul’s ar¬ rival at Rome. As Paul was in a peculiar manner the apoftle of the Gentiles, and was now a prifoner at Rome in confe- quence of having provoked the Jews, by aflerting that an obfervance of the Mofaic law was not neceffary to obtain the favour of God, he was afraid leaft an advan¬ tage ftiould be taken of his confinement to unfettle the minds of thofe whom he had converted. Hearing that the Ephefians flood firm in the faith of Chrift, without fubmitting to the law of Mofes, he writes this Epiftle to give them more exalted views of the love ef God, and of the excellence and dignity of Chrift. This epiftle is not compofed in an argumentative or didadic ftyle ; The firft three chapters confift almoft entirely of thankf- givings and prayers, or glowing deferiptions of the bleftings of the Chriftian religion. This circumftance renders them a little obfeure •, but by the afliftance of the two following epiftles, which were written on the fame oecafion, and with the fame defign, the meaning of the apoftle may be eafily difeovered. The laft three chapters contain practical exhortations. He firft incul¬ cates unity, love, and concord, from the confideration that all Chrifiians are members of the fame body, of which Chrift is the head. He then advifes them to forfake the vices to which they had been addifted while they remained heathens. He recommends juftice and charity ; ftrenuoufly condemns lewdnefs, obfeenity, and intemperance, vices which feem to have been too com¬ mon among the Ephefians. In the 6th chapter he points out the duties which arife from the relations of hufhands and wives, parents and children, mafters and fervants j and concludes with ftrong exhortations to fortitude, which he deferibes in an allegorical manner. The church at Philippi had been founded by Paul, Silas, and Timothy (Afts xvi.), in the year 51, and had continued to lliow a ftrong and manly attachment to the Chriftian religion, and a tender afi’eflion for the apoftle. Hearing of his imprifonment at Rome, they fent Epaphroditus, one of their paftors, to fupply him with money. It appears from this epiftle that he was in great want of neceflaries before-this contribution ar¬ rived } for as he had not converted the Romans, he did not confider himfelf as intitled to receive fupplies from them. Being-a prifoner, he could not work as former¬ ly ; and it was a maxim of his never to accept any pe- [ 4° ] SCR of the Ju- cuniary afflftance from thofe churches where a fa^lioh Scripture, had been raifed againft him. From the Philippians he was not averfe to receive a prefent in the time of want, becaufe he confidered it as a mark of their affedion, and becaufe he was .allured that they had conducted them- felves as fincere Chriftians. IoS It appears from the apoftle’s owm words, that this The date letter was written while he wras a prifoner at Rome, (chap. i. 7, 13. iv. 22.) ; and from the expectation which he difeovers (chap. ii. 24.) of being foon releafed and reftored to them, compared with Philemon, v. 22. and Heb. xiii. 13. where he expreffes a like expedation in ftronger terms, it is probable that this epiftle was writ¬ ten towards the end of his firft imprifonment in the year 62. _ _ . ,09 The apoftle’s defign in this epiftle, which is quite and defign of the pradical kind, feems to be, “ to comfort thect it* Philippians under the concern they had expreiled at the news of his imprifonment ; to check a party-fpirit that appears to have broken out among them, and to pro¬ mote, on the contrary, an entire union and harmony of affedion ; to guard them againft being feduced from the purity of the Chriftian faith by Judaizing teachers ; to fupport them under the trials with which they ft niggled* and, above all, to inlpire them with a concern to adorn their profeflion by the moft eminent attainments in the divine life.” After fome particular admonitions in the beginning of the 4th chapter, he proceeds in the 8th verfe to recommend virtue in the moft extenfive fenfe, mentioning all the different foundations in w hich it had been placed by the Grecian philofophers. Towards the clofe of the epiftle, he makes his acknowledgments to the Philippians for the feafonable and liberal fupply which they had fent him, as it was fo convincing a proof of their affedion for him, and their concern for the fup¬ port of the gofpel, which he preferred far above any private fecular intereft of his owm * exprefsly difclaiming all felfifh, mercenary views, and affuring them with a noble fimplicity, that he was able upon all occafions to accommodate his temper to his circumftances * and had learned, under the teachings of Divine grace, in what¬ ever ftation Providence might fee fit to place him, there¬ with to be content. After which, the apoftle, having encouraged them to exped a rich fupply of all their wants from their God and Father, to whom he devoutly aferibes the honour of all, concludes with falutations from himfelf and his friends at Rome to the whole church, and a fblemn benedidion, (verfe io. to the end) *, and declares, that he rejoiced in their liberality chiefly on their own account. 20C The epiftle to the Coloflians was written while Paul Epiftle to was in prifon (chap. iv. 3.), and was therefore probably the Colofli- compofed in the year 62. The intention of the apoftle, ans''7I?^te as far as can be gathered from the epiftle itfelf, was to ^lt * l°n fecure the Coloflians from the influence of fome doc¬ trines that were fubverfive of Chriftianity, and to excite them to a temper and behaviour worthy of their facred charader. A new fed had arifen, which had blended the oriental philofophy with the fuperftitious opinions of the Jews. 20T They held, 1. That God was furrounded by demons To guard or angels, who were mediators with God, and therefore the Coloffi- to be worfhipped. 2. That the foul is defiled by the ans againft body * that all bodily enjoyments hurt the foul, whichthe ^anger‘ they believed to be immortal, though they feem to have ^ies°of denied the Jews. SCR C 4* ] SCR Scripture, denied the refurreftion of the body, as it would only ^ render the foul finful by being reunited to it. 3. That Percy's tjjere was a great myftery in numbers, particularly in ^Nev^Te- ^ nund361- feven *, they therefore attributed a natural jlament. holinefs to the feventh or Sabbath day, which they ob- ferved more ftri&ly than the other Jews. They fpent their time moftly in contemplation *, abftained from mar¬ riage, and every gratification of the fenfes •, ufed w a fil¬ ings, and thought it finful to touch certain things ; re¬ garded wine as poifon, &c. The arguments againft tliefe do£lrines are managed with great fkill and addrefs. He begins with exprefiing great joy for the favourable character which lie had -apottle em- }jearj 0f them, and affures them that he daily prayed 102 The argu- mei^U which the ploys. 103 Exhorta¬ tions. 104 FirftEpiftle to the Thef- 'ialonians. for their farther improvement. Then he makes a ftiort digreffion, in order to defcribe the dignity of Jefus Chrift •, declares that he had created all tilings, whether thrones or dominions, principalities and powers ; that he alone was the head of the church, and had reconciled men to the Father. The inference from this defcription is evident, that Jefus was fuperior to angels •, that they were created beings, and ought not to be worfiiipped. Thus he indireflly confutes one doftrine before he for¬ mally oppofes it. Paul now returns from his digreffion in the 2ift verfe to the fentiments with which he had introduced it in the 13th and 14th verfes, and again expreffes his joy that the Philippians remained attached to the gofpel, which was to be preached to the Gentiles, without the reftraints of the ceremonial law. Here again he ftates a general doftrine, which was inconfiftent with the opinions of thofe who were z- alous for the law of Mofes ; but he leaves the Coloffians to draw the infer¬ ence, (chap. i.). Having again affured them of his tender concern for their welfare, for their advancement in virtue, and that they might acknowledge the myftery of God, that is, that the gofpel was to fuperfede the lawT of Mofes, he proceeds direflly to caution them againft the philofophy of the new teachers, and their fuperftitious adherence to the law ; fhows the fuperiority of Chrift to the angels, and warns Chriftians againft worffiipping them. He cenfures the obfervation of Sabbaths, and rebukes thofe who required abftinence from certain kinds of food, and cautions them againft perfons who affume a great appear¬ ance of wifdom and virtue, (chap. ii.). In the 3d chapter he exhorts them, that, inftead of being occupied about external ceremonies, they ought to cultivate pure morality. He particularly guards them againft impurity, to which they had before their con- verfion been much addi&ed. He admonifties them againft indulging the irafcible paffions, and againft committing falfehood. He exhorts them to cultivate the benevolent affeftions, and humility, and patience. He recommends alfo the relative duties between huf- bands and wives, parents and children, mafters and fer- vants. He enjoins the duties of prayer and thankfgiving (chap. iv. 2.), and requefts them to remember him in their petitions. He enjoins affability and mild behavi¬ our to the unconverted heathens (verfe 6th) j and con¬ cludes the epiftle with matters which are all of a private nature, except the directions for reading this epiftle in the church of Laodicea, as well as in the church of Coloffe. This epiftle is addreffed to the inhabitants of Theffa- Vol. XIX, Part J. lonica, the capital of Macedonia, a large and populous Scripture.^ city. It appears from the A£ts, chapter Xvii. 1. that the Chriftian religion was introduced into this city by Paul and Silas, foon after they had left Philippi. At firft they made many converts $ but at length the Jews, ever jealous of the admiffion of the Gentiles to the fame privileges with themfelves, ftirred up the rabble, which affaulted the houfe where the apoftle and his friends lodged •, fo that Paul and Silas were obliged to flee to Berea, -where their fuceefs rvas foon interrupted by the fame reftlefs and implacable enemies. The apoftle then withdrew to Athens *, and Timothy, at his defire, re¬ turned to Theffalonica (1 Theff. iii. 2.), to fee what were the fentiments and behaviour of the inhabitants after the perfecution of the Jews. From Athens Paul went to Corinth, where he flayed a year and fix months j during which, Timothy returned with the joyful tidings, that the Theffalonians remained ftedfaft to the faith, and firmly attached to the apoftle, notwithftanding his flight. Upon this he fent them this epiftle, A. D. 52, in the 12th year of Claudius. 205 This is generally reckoned the-firft epiftle which Paul The date wrote j and we find he was anxious that it fhould be read to all the Chriftians. In chap. v. 27. he ufes thefe words ; “ I adjure you by the Lord, that this epiftle be read unto all the holy brethren.” This direclien is very properly inferted in his firft epiftle. 206- The intention of Paul in writing this epiftle was evi- and defign dently to encourage the Tbeffalonians to adhere to theofh* Chriftian religion. This church being ftill in its in¬ fancy, and oppreffed by the powerful Jews, required to be eftablifhed in the faith. St Paul, therefore, in the three firft chapters, endeavours to convince the Theffa- s lonians of the truth and divinity of his gofpel, both by the miraculous gifts of the Holy Ghoft which had been imparted, and by his own conduft when among them. While he appeals, in the firft chapter, to the mira¬ culous gifts of the Holy Spirit, lie is very liberal in his commendations. He vindicates himfelf from the charge of timidity, probably to prevent the Theffalo¬ nians from forming an unfavourable opinion of his forti¬ tude, which his flight might have excited. He afferts, that he was not influenced by felfifli or difhonourable motives, but that lie was anxious to pleafe God and not man. He exprefies a ftrong affeflion for them, and how anxious he was to impart the bleffings of the gofpel. He congratulates himfelf upon his fucccfs ; mentions it to their honour that they received the gofpel as the word of God and not of man, and therefore did not re¬ nounce it when perfecution was railed by the Jews. He expreffes a ftrong defire to vifit the Theffalonians j and affures them he had been hitherto retained againft his will. As a farther proof of his regard, the apofile informs them, that when he came to Athens, he vras fo much concerned, leaft, being- difeouraged by his fufferings, they ftiould be tempted to caft off their profeffion, that he could not forbear fending Timothy to comfort and ftrengthen them ; and expreffes, in very ftrong terms, the fenfible pleafure he felt, in the midft of all his afflic¬ tions, from the favourable account he received of their faith and love ; to which he adds, that he wras continu¬ ally praying for their farther eftabliftiment in religion, and for an opportunity of making them another vifit, in F order 2C7 Second E- piftle to the Thefla- lonians. 208 Contents of k. S C Ft [ •Scrip-are^ order to promote their edification, whiclrlay fo near his — ' heart, (chap. iii. throughout). Having now fhown his paternal affection for them, ■with great addrefs he improves all that influence which his zeal and fidelity in their fervice mult naturally have given him to inculcate upon them the precepts of the gofpel. He recommends chaftity, in oppofition to the prevailing practice of the heathens •, jullice, in oppofi¬ tion to fraud. He praifes their benevolence, and en¬ courages them to cultivate higher degrees of it. He recommends induflry and prudent behaviour to their heathen neighbours. In order to comfort them under the lofs of their friends, he affures them that thofe who were fallen afleep in Jeius (liould be raifed again at the lad day, and fhould, together with thofe who remained alive, be caught up to meet their Lord, and fliare his triumph, (chap. iv.). He admonifhes them to prepare for this folemn event, that it might not come upon them unawares •, and then concludes the epiftle with various exhortations. I he Lcond epiftle to the Theffalonians appears to have been written foon after the firft, and from the fame place ; for Silvanus or Silas, and Timothy, are joined together with the apoftle in the inferiptions of this epiftle, as well as the former. The apoftle begins with commending the faith and charity of the Theffalonians, of which he had heard a favourable report. He expreffes great joy on account of the patience with which they fupported perfecution 5 and obferves that their perfecution was a proof of a righteous judgment to come, where their perfecutors would meet with their proper recompenfe, and the / righteous be delivered out of all their affliftions. He affures them of his conftant prayers for their farther im¬ provement, in order to attain the felicity that was pro- mifed, (chap. i.). From mifunderftan-ding a paffage in his former letter, it appears that the Theffalonians believed the day of judgment was at hand. To re£Hfy this miftake, he informs them that the day of the Lord will not come till a great apoftafy has overfpread the Chriftian world, the nature of which he deferibes (g). Symptoms of this myftery of iniquity had then appeared j but the apoftle expreffes- his thankfulnefs to God that the Theffalo- nians had efcaped this corruption. He exhorts them to ftedfaftnefs, and prays that God would comfort and ilrengthen them, (chap. ii.). He requefts the prayers of the Theffalonians for him and his two afliftants, at the fame time exprefling his eonfidence that they would pay due regard to the in- ftruftions which he had given them. He then pro¬ ceeds to correct fome irregularities. Many of the Theffalonians feem to have led an idle diforderly life ; thefe he fevercly reproves, and commands the faithful to fhun their company if they ilill remained incorri- ,09 §IbTleT; Fkft Epiftle When the firfl: Epiftle to Timothy was written, it is to Timothy, difficult to afeertain. Lardner dates it in 56} Mill, when writ- Whitby, and Macknight, pla ee it in 64 : but the ar- 42 ] SCR guments on which each party founds their opinion are Scripture, too long to infert here. 1 v—^ Timothy was the intimate friend and companion ofj { Paul, and is always mentioned by that apoftle with much affeftion and efteem. Having appointed him to tents of it. fuperinlend the church of Ephefus during a journey which he made to Macedonia, he wrote this letter, in order to direct him how to difeharge the important truft which was committed to him. This was the more ne- ceffary, as Timothy was young and inexperienced, (1 Tim. iv. 12.). In the beginning of the epiftle he reminds him of the charge with which he had intruded him, to wit, to preferve the purity of the gofpel again!! the pernicious doctrines of the Judaizing teachers, whofe opinions led to frivolous controverfies, and not to a good life. He ftiows the ufe of the law of Mofes,.of which thefe teachers were ignorant. This account of the law* he affures Timothy, was agreeable to the reprefentation of it in the gofpel, with the preaching of which he was intruded. He then makes a digreflion, in the fulnefs of his heart, to exprefs the fenfe which he felt of the goodr nefs of God towards him. In the fecond chapter, the apoftle preferibes the man¬ ner in which the worftiipof God was to be performed in the church of Ephefus •, and in the third explains the qualifications of the perfons whom he was to ordain as bifhops and deacons. In the fourth chapter he foretels the great corruptions of the church which were to pre¬ vail in future times, and inftrufls him how to fupport the facred charadler. In the fifth chapter he teaches Timothy how to admoniffi the old and young of both fexes $ mentions the age and character of fuch widows as were to be employed by the foeiety in fome peculiar office j and fubjoins fome things concerning the refpeft due to elders. In the fixth chapter he deferibes the duties which Timothy was to inculcate on Haves j con¬ demns trifling controverfies and pernicious difputes; ten- fures the exceffive love of money, and charges the rich to be rich in good wrords. That the fecond Epiftle to Timothy w as- written sec0n”£ from Rome is univerfally agreed ; but w'hether it was piftie to during his firft or fecond imprifonment has been much Timothy, difputed. That Timothy wfas at Ephefus or in Alia Minor when this Epiftle was fent to him, appears from the frequent mention in it of perfons refiding at Ephe- 212 fus. The apoftle feems to have intended to prepare Ti- Defign and mothy for thofe fufferings which he forefaw he would ™f tcnts ot' be expofed to. He exorts him to conftancy and perfe- verance, and to perform with a good confcience the du¬ ties of the facred function. The falfe teachers, who had. before thrown this church into confufion, grew: every day worfe : info much that not only Hymenaeus, but Philetus, another Ephe- fian heretic, now denied the refurreftion of the dead. They were led into this error by a difpute about words. At firft they only annexed various improper fignifica- tions to the word refurre&ion, but at laft they denied it altogether (h) 5 pretending that the refurreftion of the dead was only a refurredlion from the death of fin, and fo (g) For an explanation of this prophecy, Dr Hurd’s fermons may be confulted. He applies it to the papal power, to which it correfponds with aftonifhing exa&n.efs. (ft) This is by no means uncommon among men 3 to begin to difpute about the fignification of words, and to _2T3 Epiftle to Titus. 414 Scripture, fo was already paft 1 -v 1 ved from the eaftern philofophy, which placed the origin of fin in the body (chapter ii.). He then forewarns him of the fatal apoftafy and declenfion that was beginning to appear in the church ; and at the fame time animates him from his own example and the great motives of Chriitianity, to the moft vigorous and refolute difcharge of every part of the miniderial office. This E pi tile is addreiTed to Titus, whom Paul had appointed to prefide over the church of Crete. It is difficult to determine either its date or the place from which it was fent. The apoftle begins with reminding Titus of the reafons for which he had left him at Defigns and Crete *, and directs him on what principles he was to contents of ^ jn ordaining Chriftian pallors : the qualifications of whom he particularly defcribes. To ffiow him how cautious he ought to be in felefting men for the facred office, he reminds him of the arts of the Judaizing teachers, and the bad chara&er of the Cretans (chap¬ ter i.). He advifes him to accommodate his exhortations to the refpedtive ages, fexes, and circumftances, of thofe whom it was his duty to indraft ”, and to give the greater weight to his indruftions, he admoniffies him to be an example of what he taught (chap. ii.). He exhorts him alfo to teach obedience to the civil magif- trate, becaufe the Judaizing Chridians affirmed that no obedience was due from the worlhippers of the true God to magidrates who were idolaters. He cautions againd cenforioufnefs and contention, and recommends meeknefs ; for even the bed Chridians had formerly been wicked, and all the bleffings which they enjoyed they derived from the goodnels of God. He then en¬ joins Titus drenuoudy to inculcat^ good works, and to avoid ufelefs controverfies ; and concludes with direft- ing him how to proceed with thofe heretics who at¬ tempted to fow diflenfion in the church. The Epidle to Philemon was written from Rome at the fame time with the Epidles to the Coloffians *nd Philippians, about A. D. 6201- 63. The occafion of the letter was this : Onefimus, Philemon’s Have, had robbed his mader and fled to Rome •, where, happily for him, he met with the apodle, who was at that time a prifoner at large, and by his indruftions and admoni¬ tions was converted to Chridianity ; and reclaimed to a -Doddridge’sfenfe his duty. St Paul'feems to have kept him for Family Ex- fome confiderable time under his eye, that he might be fojitor. fatisfied of the reality of the change •, and, when he had made a fufficient trial of him, and found that his beha¬ viour was entirely agreeable to his prcfeffion, he would not detain him any longer for his own private conveni¬ ence, though in a fituation that rendered fuch an affid- ant peculiarly defirable (compare ver. 13, 14.), but fent him back to his mader ; and, as a mark of his edeem, entruded him, together with Tychicus, with the charge of delivering his Epidle to the church at Coloffe, and giving them a particular account of the date of things at Rome,’recommending him to them, at the fame time, as a'faithful and beloved brother (Col. iv. 9.). e R [ 43 1 SCR This error was probably deri- And as Philemon might well be fuppofed to be drongly Scripture. ,4IS Epiftle to Philemon. —Date and defijni of it. prejudiced againd one who had left his fervice in fo infamous a manner, he fends him this letter, in which he employs all his induence to remove his fufpicions, and reconcile hirn to the thoughts of taking Onefimus into his family again. And whereas St Paul might have exerted that authority which his charafter as an apodle, and the relation in which he dood to Philemon as a fpiritual father, would naturally give him, he choofes to entreat him as a friend } and with the fofteft and mod infinuating addrefs urges his fuit, conjuring him by all the ties of Chridian friendlhip that he would not deny him his requed : and the more effeftually to prevail upon him, he reprefents his own peace and hap- pinefs as deeply intereded in the event; and fpeaks of Onefimus in fuch terms as were bed adapted to foften his prejudices, and difpofe him to receive one who was fo dear to himfelf, not merely as a fervant, but as a fel¬ low Chridian and a friend. It is impoffible to read over this admirable Epidle, The ikill without being touched with the delicacy of fentiment, and addrefs and the maderly addrefs that appear in every part of it. which the We fee here, in a mod driking light, how perfeftly con- ^°utse;nU* fident true politenefs is, not only with all the warmth tys £piftiQ. and fincerity of the friend, but even with the dignity of the Chridian and the apodle. And if this letter were to be confidered in no other view than as a mere human compofition, it mud be allowed a mader-piece in its kind. As an illudration of this remark, it may not be improper to compare it with an epidle of Pliny, that feems to have been written upon a fimilar occafion, (lib. ix. lit. 21)5 which, though penned by one that was rec¬ koned to excel in the epidolary dyle, and though it has undoubtedly many beauties, yet mud be acknowledged, by every impartial reader, vadly inferior to this anima¬ ted compofition of the apodle. 2Iy The Epidle to the Hebrews has been generally Epiftle to afcribed to Paul •, but the truth of this opinion has been the He- fufpefted by others, for three reaibns : 1. The name of^^^** the writer is nowhere mentioned, neither in the begin- by pau£ ning nor in any other part of the Epidle. 2. T he dyle is laid to be more elegant than Paul’s. 3. There are expreffions in the Epidle which have been thought un- fuitable to an apodle’s charafter. I. In anfwer to the fird objeftion, Clemens Alexandrinus has affigned a very good reafon : “ Writing to the Hebrews (fays he), who had conceived a prejudice againd him, and were on the E- fufpicious of him, he wifely declined fetting his xmcn&fijllcs. at the beginning, led he ffiould offend them.” 2. Ori- gen and Jerome admired the elegance of the dyle, and reckoned it fuperior to that which Paul had exhibited in his Epidles : but as ancient tedimony had affigned it to Paul, they endeavoured to anfwer the objeftion, by fuppofing that the fentiments were the apodle’s, but the language and conrpofition the work of fome other perfon. If the Epidle, however, be a trandation, which wc believe it to be, the elegance of the language may belong to the trandator. As to the compofilion and arrangement, it cannot be denied that there are many fpecimens in the writings of this apodle not in- F 2 ferior -to be led gradually to deny the thing fignified. This appears to have been the c^ufe of mod difputes and the general beginning of fcepticifm and infidelity. , Scripture. s C P. [ 44 I s ferior in tliefe qualities to the Epiftle to the Hebrews, ence with his dominion C R ns Quoted as his by an- sient wri¬ ters. 219 Written in the Syro- Chaldaic language. 220 Bate of it. Percy's Key to the New Tef- titment. 221 Defign of it to prove to the Jews the truth of the Chri- itian reli¬ gion and its fuperi- 01 ity to the law of Mefes; 3. It is objected, that in Heb. ii. 3. the writer of this Epiftle joins hinifelf with thofe who had received the gofpel from Chrift’s apoftles. Now Paul had it from Chrift himfelf. But Paul often appeals to the teftimony of the apoftles in fupport of thofe truths which he had received from Revelation. We may inftance 1 Cor. xv. 5, 6, 7, 8.; 2. Tim. ii. 2. This Epiftle is not quoted till the end of the fecond century, and even then does not feem to have been uni- verfally received. This filence might be owing to the Hebrews themfelves, wrho fuppofing this letter had no relation to the Gentiles, might be at pains to diffufe co¬ pies .of it. The authors, however, on whofe teflimony rve receive it as authentic, are entitled to credit; for they lived fo near the age of the apoftles, that they were in no danger of being impofed on ; and from the numerous lift of books which they rejedled as fpurious, we are allured that they were very careful to guard againft impofition. It is often quoted as Paul’s by Clemens Alexandrinus, about the year 194. It is received and quoted as Paul’s by Origen, about 230 ; by Dionyfius bifhop of Alexandria in 247 ; and by a numerous lift of fucceeding writers. The Epiftle to the Hebrews was originally written in Hebrew, or rather Syro-Chaldaic 5 a fa£t which we believe on the teftimony of Clemens Alexandrinus, Je¬ rome, and Eufebius. To this it has been objedled, that as thefe writers have not referred to any authority, we ought to confider what they fay on this fubjeft mere¬ ly as an opinion. But as they ftate no reafons for adopting this opinion, but only mention as a fa£t that Paul wrote to the Hebrews in their native language, • •• • #oo7 Ave mult allow that it is their teftimony which they produce, and not their opinion. Eufebius informs us, that feme fuppofed Luke the Evangelift, and others Clemens Romanus, to have been the tranflator. According to the opinion of ancient writers, particu¬ larly Clemens Alexandrinus, Jerome, and Euthalius, this Epiftle was addreffed to the Jewrs in Paleftine.—: The fcope of the Epiftle confirms this opinion. Having now given fufficient evidence that this Epiftle was written by Paul, the time when it was written may be eafily determined : For the falutation from the faints of Italy (chap. iv. 24.), together with the apoftle’s promife to fee the Hebrews (ver. 23.), plainly intimate, that his confinement was then either ended or on the eve of being ended. It muft therefore have been writ¬ ten foon after the Epiftles to the Colofiians, Ephefians, and Philemon, and not long before Paul left Italy, that is, in the year 61 or 62. As the zealous defenders of the Mofaic law rvould naturally infill on the divine authority of Mofes, on the majefty and glory attending its promulgation by the miniftry of angels, and the great privileges it afforded thofe who adhered to it 5 the apoftle ftiows, I. That in all thefe feveral articles Chriftianity had an infinite fuperiority to the law. This topic he purfues from chap. i. to xi. wherein he reminds the believing Hebrews of the extraordinary favour ftiown them by God, in fending them a revela¬ tion by his own fon, whofe glory was far fuperior to that of angels (chap. i. throughout) ; very naturally inferring from hence the danger of defpifing Chrift on account of his humiliation, which, in perfect confift- 3 over the world to come, was Scripture, voluntarily fubmitted to by him for wife and important reafons 5 particularly to deliver us from the fear of death, and to encourage the freedom of our accefs to God (chap. ii. throughout). With the fame view he magnifies Chrift as fuperior to Mofes, their great legif- lator j and from the punilhment inflicted on thofe who rebelled againft the authority of Mofes, infers the dan¬ ger of contemning the promifes of the gofpel (chap. iii. 2—13.). And as it was an eafy tranfition to call to mind on this occafion that reft in Canaan to which the authority invefted in Mofes was intended to lead them j the apoftle hence cautions them againft: unbelief, as what would prevent their entering into a fuperior ftate a of reft to what the Jews ever enjoyed (chap. iii. 14. iv. 11.). This caution is ftill farther enforced by aw ¬ ful views of God’s omnifcience, and a lively reprefenta- tion of the high-priefthood of Chrift (chap. iv. to the end } and chap. v. throughout). In the next place, he intimates the very hopelefs fituation of thofe who apo- ftatife from Chriftianity (chap. vi. 1—9.) ; and then, for the comfort and confirmation of fincere believers, difplays to them the goodnefs of God, and his faithful adherence to his holy engagements $ the performance of which is fealed by the entrance of Chrift into heaven as our forerunner (chap. vi. 9. to the end). Still far¬ ther to illuftrate the charafter of our Lord, he enters into a parallel between him and Melchizedec as to their title and defeent j and, from inftances wherein the priefthood of Melchizedec excelled the Levitical, infers, that the glory of the priefthood of Chrift furpaffed that under the law (chap. vii. 1—17.). From thefe premifes the apoftle argues, that the Aaronical priefthood was not only excelled, but confummated by that of Chrift, to which it was only introduftory and fubfervient j and of courfe, that the obligation of the law was henceforth diffolved (chap. vii. 18. to the end). Then recapitu¬ lating what he had already demonftrated concerning the fuperior dignity of Chrift’s priefthood, he thence illu- ftrates the diftinguiflied excellence of the new cove¬ nant, as not only foretold by Jeremiah, but evidently enriched with much better promifes than the old (ch. viii. throughout) : Explaining farther the doftrine of the priefthood and interceflion of Chrift, by comparing it with what the Jewifh high-prieft did on the great day of atonement (chap. ix. I—14*)* Afterwards he enlarges on the necefiity of ftiedding Chrift’s blood, and the fufficiency of the atonement made by it (chap. ix. 15. to the end) ; and proves that the legal ceremonies could not by any means purify the confcience : whence he infers the infufticiency of the Mofaic law, and the neceflity of looking beyond it (chap. x. 1—15.). He then urges the Hebrews to improve the privileges which fuch an high-prieft and covenant conferred on them, to the purpofes of approaching God with confidence, to a conftant attendance on his worlhip, and moft benevo¬ lent regards to each other (chap. x. 15—25.). The apoftle having thus obviated the inlinuations and objections of the Jew's, for the fatisfaClion and eftablifh- ment of the believing Hebrews, proceeds, 222 II. To prepare and fortify their minds againft theandtoam- ftorm of perfecution which in part had already befallen111316 them them, which was likely to continue and be often renew- -c ed, he reminds them of thofe extremities they had endu- ^ith^forti^ red, and of the fatal effe&s which would attend their tude. apoftafy calling of faith and forti- 2Z3 The feven Catholic epiftles. SCR Scripture, apoflafy (chap. x. 26. to the end) r remembrance the eminent example tude exhibited by holy men, and recorded in the Old Teftament (chap. xi. 1—29.). He concludes his dif- courfe with glancing at many other illuftrious worthies j and, befides thofe recorded in Scripture, refers to the cafe of feveral who fuffered under the perfecution of An- tiochus Epiphanes (2 Maceab. chap. viii. &c. chap. xi. 3°. xii. 2.). . Having thus fmidled tlie argumentative part of the Epiftle, the apoitle proceeds to a general application ; in which he exhorts the Hebrew Chriftians to patience, peace, and holinefs (chap. xii. 3—14.) j cautions them againft fecular views and fenfual gratifications, by lay¬ ing before them the incomparable excellence of the bleffmgs introduced by the gofpel, which even the Jew- ilh economy, glorious and magnificent as it was, did by no means equal j exhorts them to brotherly affeftion, purity, compaflion, dependence on the divine care, Ifed- faftnofs in the profeflion of truth, a life, of thankfulnefs to God, and benevolence to man : and concludes the whole with recommending their pious minifters to their particular regard, intreating their prayers, faluting and granting them his ufual benediftion. The feven following Epiftles, one of James, two of Peter, three of John, and one of Jude, have been dif- tinguilhed by the appellation of catholic or general epit- tles, becaufe mod; of them are inferibed, not to parti¬ cular churches or perfons, but to the body of Jewitli or Gentile converts over the world. The authenticity of fome of thefe has been frequently quellioned, viz. The Epiftle of James, the fecond of Peter, the Epiftle of Jude, and the fiecond and third of John. The ancient Chriftians were very cautious in admitting any books into their canon whole authenticity they had any reafon Macknight to fufpefl. They rejefted all the writings forged by heretics in the name of the apoftles, and certainly, there¬ fore, ivould not receive any without firft fubjecting them to a fevere ferutiny. Now, though thefe five epiftles were not immediately acknowledged as the writings of the apoftles, this only (hows that the perfons who doubted had not received complete and inconteftable evidence of their authenticity. But as they were af¬ ter-wards univerfally received, we have every reafon to conclude, that upon a Uriel: examination they were found to be the genuine productions of the apoftles. The truth is, fo good an opportunity had the ancient Chriftians of examining this matter, fo careful were they to guard aagainft impofition, and fo well founded was their judgment concerning the books of the New Tefta¬ ment, that, as Dr Lardner obferves, no writing which they pronounced genuine has yet been proved fpurious, nor have we at this day the leaft reafon to believe any book genuine which they rejected. That the Epiftle of James was written in the apofto- lical age is proved by the quotations of ancient authors. Clemens Romanus and Ignatius feem to have made re¬ ferences to it. Origen quotes it once or twice.—.There are feveral reafons why it was not more generally quoted by the firft Chriftian writers. Being written to cor- re£t the errors and vices which prevailed among the Jews, the Gentiles might think it of lefs importance to them, and therefore take no pains to procure copies of it. As the author wras fometimes denominated James the Juft, and often called bifhop of Jerufalem, it might be doubt- on the E- piJUes. 224 Eplftle of Tames the Lefs. t 45 1 SCR to their ed whether he was one of the apoftles. But its au- Scripture, thenticity does not feem to have been fufpedled on ac-v-—-' count of the doftrines which it contains. In modern times, indeed, Luther called it a ftrawy epiftle {epiftola Jlraminea), and excluded it from the facred writings, on account of its apparent oppofition to the apoftle Paul concerning juftification by faith. This Epiftle could not be written by James the Elder, the Ion of Zebedee, and brother of John, -who was be¬ headed by Herod in the year 44, for it contains paffages which refer to a later period. It mull, therefore, have been the compofition of James the Lefs, the fon of Alpheus, who was called the Lord's brother, becaufe he was the fon of Mary, the filler of our Lord’s mother. 225 As to the date of this Epiftle, Lardner fixes it in the The date year 61 or 62. James the Lefs ftatedly refided at Jerufalem, whence lie hath been ilyled by lome ancient fathers bilhop of that city, though without fufficient foundation. Now Loddrid- James being one of the apoftles of the circumcifion,^ ■f Family while he confined his perfonal labours to the inhabitants ’ of Judea, it was very natural for him to endeavour by his writings to extend his fervices to the Jewilh Chrif¬ tians who were difperfed abroad in more diftant re- t2(^ gions. For this purpofe, there are two points which and defign the apoftle feems to have principally aimed at, though he hath not purfued them in an orderly and logical me¬ thod, but in the free epiftolary manner, handling them jointly or diftintftly as occafions naturally offered. And thefe were, “ to correct thofe errors both in dotffrine and praftice into which the Jewifli Chriftians had fallen, which might otherwife have produced fatal confequen- ces j and then to eftablilh the faith and animate the hope of fincere believers, both under their prefent and their approaching fufferings.” The opinions -which he is moft anxious to refute are thefe, that God is the author of fin, (ch. i. 13.) 5 that the belief of the doftrines of the gofpel was fufficient to procure the favour of God for them, however defi¬ cient they were in good ivorks, (ch. ii.). He diffuades the Jews from afpiring to the office of teachers in the third chapter, becaufe their prejudices in favour of the law of Mofes might induce them to pervert the doctrines of the gofpel. He therefore guards them againft the fins of the tongue, by reprefenting their pernicious ef¬ fects ; and as they thought themfelves wile and intelli¬ gent, and were ambitious of becoming teachers, he ad- vifes them to make good their pretenfions, by ffiowing themfelves pofl’efled of that wifdom which is from above, (ch. iii.). The deftrudlion of Jerufalem was now approaching j the Jews were fplit into faftions, and often flaughtered one another ; the apoftle, therefore, in the fourth chap¬ ter, admonilhes them to purify themfelves from thofe vices which produced tumults and bloodlhed. To roufe them to repentance, he foretels the miferies that were coming upon them. Laftly, he checks an irreligious fpirit that feems to have prevailed, and concludes the Epiftle with feveral exhortations. The authenticity of the firft Epiflle of Peter has Firft never been denied. It is referred to by Clemens piftle o£ Romanus, by Polycarp, and is quoted by Papias, Ire-Peter> nceus, Clemens Alexandrinus, and Tertullian. It is addrefled to the ftrangers fcattered through Pontus, &c. who arc evidently Chriftians in general, as appears from chap. SCR [ 46 1 “In time part they were not a people, controverted azS The date 229 and defign of it. Scripture. chap. ii. 10. ' ^ ' but are now the people of God.” From Peter’s fend ing the falutation of the church at Babylon to the Chriftians in Pontus, &c. it is generally believed that he wrote it in Babylon. There was a Babylon in and another in Aflyria. It could not be the former, for it was an obfcure place, which feems to have had no church for the firlt four centuries. We have no authority to affirm that Peter ever was in Af- fyria. Ihemoft probable opinion is that of Grotius, Whitby, Lardner, as well as of Eufebius, Jerome, and others, that by Babylon Peter figuratively means Rome. Lardner dates it in 63 or 64, or at the lateft 65. St Peter’s chief defign is to confirm the do&rine of St Paul, which the falfe teachers, pretended he was op- pofing 5 and to allure the profelytes that they rtood in the true grace of God, (ch. v. 12.). With this view he calls them ele£! ; and mentions, that they had been declared fuch by the effufion of the Holy Ghoft upon them, (ch. i. 1, 2.), He aflures them that they were regenerate without circumcifion, merely through the gofpel and refurre&ion of Chrift, (ver. 3, 4,. 21—25.) ; and that their fufferings were no argument of their be¬ ing under the difpleafure of God, as the Jews imagined, (ver. 6—12.). He recommends it to them to hope for grace to the end, (ver. 13.). He teftifies, that they were not redeemed by the Pafchal lamb, but through Chrift, whom God had preordained for this purpofe before the foundation of the world, (ver. 18—20.). The lecond Epiftle of Peter is not mentioned by any ancient writer extant till the fourth century, from which The time it has been received by all Chriftians except the Sy- 1C1' rians. Jerome acquaints us, that its authenticity was difputed, on account of a remarkable difference between the ftyle of it and the former Epiftle. But this re¬ markable difference in ftyle is confined to the 2d chapter of the 2d Epiftle. No objedftion, however, can be drawn from this circumftance j for the fubjeft of that chapter is different from the reft of Peter’s writings, and nothing is fo well known than that different fubjedts fuggeft different ftyles. Peter, in defcribing the cha- rafler of fome flagitious impoftors, feels an indignation which he cannot fupprefs : it breaks out, therefore, in the bold and animated figures of an oriental 'Writer. Such a diverfity of ftyle. is not uncommon in the beft writers, efpecially when warmed with their lubjedh This objedlion being removed, we contend that this Epiftle was written by Peter, from the infcription, Si¬ mon Peter, a fervant and an apojlle of Jefus Chrijl. It appears from chap. i. 16, 17, 18. that the writer was one of the difciples who faw the transfiguration of our Saviour. Since it has never been afcribed to James or John, it muft therefore have been Peter. It is evident, from chap. iii. x. that the author had written an Epiftle before to the fame perfons, which is another eireum- ftance that proves Peter to be the author. It is acknowledged, however, that all this evidence is merely internal; for we have not been able to find any external evidence upon the fubjeft. If, therefore, the credit which we give to any fadl is to be in proportion to the degree of evidence with which it is accompanied, we fliall allow more authority due to the gofpels than to the epiftles ; more to thofc epiftles which have been generally acknowledged than to thofe which have been sen 230 Second E- piftle of Peter, authentici ty of it -proved * 231 from inter¬ nal evi¬ dence. and therefore no doftrine of ChrfTtianity Scripture ought to be founded folely upon them. It may alfo be -v—- added, that perhaps the beft way of determining what are the cffential dodtrines of Chriftianity would be to examine what are the doctrines which occur ofteneft in the gofpels ; for the gofpels are the plaineft parts of the New leftament; and their authenticity is moft completely proved. They are therefore beft fitted for common readers. Nor will it be denied, we prefume, that our Saviour taught all the doftrines of the Chrif- tian religion himlelf j that he repeated them on different occafions, and inculcated them with an earneftnefs pro¬ portionable to their importance. The Epiftles are to be confidered as a commentary on the effential do&rines of the gofpel, adapted to the fituation and circumftances of particular churches, and perhaps fometimes explaining doftrines of inferior importance. 1. The effential doc¬ trines are therefore firft to be fought for in the gofpels, and to be determined by the number of times they occur. 2. They are to be fought for, in the next place, in the uncontroverted Epiftles, in the fame manner. 3. No effential doftrine ought to be founded on a fingle paffage, nor on the authority of a controverted Epiftle. That Peter was old, and near his end, when he wrote this Epiftle, may be inferred from chap. i. 14. “ Know¬ ing that ftiortly I muft put off this tabernacle, even as our Lord Jefus has (hewn me.” Lardner thinks it was written foon after the former. Others, perhaps with more accuracy, date it in 67. The general defign of this Epiftle is, to confirm tbeDe^ot- doffrines and inftruffions delivered in the former j “ toit. * excite the Chriftian converts to adorn, and ftedfaftly ad¬ here to their holy religion, as a religion proceeding from God, notwithftandingthe artifices of falfe teachers, whofe character is at large deferibed; or the perfecution of their bitter and inveterate enemies.” ,33 The firft Epiftle of John is afcribed by the unanimous Tirft E- fuffrage of the ancients to the beloved difciple of ourP'ftleof r j t. • r , . , t, , • T, . - John. I Lord. Its It is referred to by Polycarp, is quoted by Pa- aut}ient; pias, by Ireneeus, and was received as genuine by Cle- c;ty ari(j" mens Alexandrinus,'by Dionyfius of Alexandria, by Cy-ftyie. prian, by Origen, and Eufebius. There is fuch a refem- blance between the ftyle and fentiments of this Epiftle and thofe of the gofpel according to John, as to afford the higheft degree of internal evidence that they are the compofition of the fame author. In the ftyle of this apoftle there is a remarkable peculiarity, and efpecially in this Epiftle. His fentences, coniidered feparately, are exceeding clear and intelligible ; but when we fearch for their connexion, we frequently meet with greater dif¬ ficulties than we do even in the Epiftles of St Paul. The principal fignature and charafteriftic of his manner is an artlefs and amiable fimplicity, and a fingular mo- defty and candour, in conjunction with a wonderful fub- limity of fentiment. His conceptions are apparently de¬ livered to us in the order in which they arofe to his own mind, and are not the product of artificial rtafoning or laboured inVeftigation. It is impoflible to fix with any precifion the date of this Epiftle, nor can we determine to what perfons it Avas addreffed. The leading defign of the apoftle is to thoAV the in-Deficit ef fufficiency of faith, and the external profeffion of reli-it. ^ gion, feparate from morality ; to guard the Chriftians to Avhom he xvrites againft the delufive arts of the cor¬ rupters S C R £ Scripture. 235 , Second and third E- piftles of John. 23d Epiitie of Jude. Its authenti¬ city rupters of Chriftianity, whom he calls Antichrlft j to inculcate univerfal benevolence. His admonitions concerning the neceflity of good morals, and the inef¬ ficacy of external profeffions, are fcattered over the Epiftle, but are moil frequent in the ill, 2d, and 3d chapters. The enemies or corrupters of Chrillianity, againll whom he contends, feem to have denied that Jefus was the Mefliah the Son of God (chapter ii. 22. v. 1.), and had aflually come into the world in a human form, (chap. iv. 2, 3.). The earneftnefs and frequency with which this apoltle recommends the duty of bene¬ volence is remarkable. He makes it the diftinguilhing charaileriftic of the difciples of Jefus, the only fure pledge of our love to God, and the only affurance of eternal life, (chap. iii. 34, 15.). Benevolence was his favourite theme, which he affectionately preffed upon others, and conllantly praClifed himfelf. It was conlpi- cuous in his conduCl to his great Matter, and in the re¬ ciprocal affedlion which it infpired in his facred breaft. He continued to recommend it in his laft words. When his extreme age and infirmities had fo walled his llrength that he was incapable to exercife the duties of his office, the venerable old man, anxious to exert in the fervice of his Mailer the little llrength which Hill remained, eaufed himfelf to be carried to church, and, in the midll of the congregation, he repeated thefe words, “ Little children love one another.” It has been obferved by Dr Mill that the fecond and third Epillles of John are fo ffiort, and referable the firft fo much in fentiment and llyle, that it is not worth ivhile to contend about them. The fecond Epiltle con- fills only of 13 verfes •, and of thefe eight may be found in the ill Epiltle, in which the fenfe or language is pre- cifely the fame. I he fecond Epiltle is quoted by Irenams, and was received by Clemens Alexandrinus. Both were ad¬ mitted by Athanafius, by Cyril of Jerufalem, and by Jerome. The fecond is addreffed to a woman of di- IlinClion whofe name is by fome fuppofed to be Cijria (taking y-v^u, for a proper name), by others Kc/e£ia. The third is infcribed to Gaius, or Caius according to the Latin orthography, who, in the opinion of Lardner, was an eminent Chriltian, that lived in fome city of Alia not far from Ephefus, where St John chiefly re- lided after his leaving Judea. The time of writing thefe two Epillles cannot be determined with any cer¬ tainty. They are fo Ihort that an analyfis of them is not neceffary. The Epiltle of Jude is cited by no ancient Chriltran writer extant before Clemens Alexandrinus about the year 194 ; but this author has tranfcribed eight or ten verfes in his Stromata and Pedagogue. It is quoted once by Tertullian about the year 20Q ; by Origen frequently about 230. It was not however received by many of the ancient Chriltians, on account of a fuppofed quotation from a book of Enoch. But it is not certain that Jude quotes any book. He only fays that Enoch prophejied, faying, The Lord cometh with ten thoufand of his faints. Thefe might be words of 47 J- S G R . and a prophecy preferved by tradition, and inferted occafion- Scripture, ally in different writings. Nor is there any evidence —v— that there was fuch a book as Enoch’s prophecies in the time of Jude, though a book of that name was ex¬ tant in the fecond and third centuries. As to the date of this Epiltle nothing beyond conjedlure can be pro- duced. _ . . 237 The defign of it is, by deferibing the chara&er of the and delign. falfe teachers, and the punilhments to which they were liable, to caution Chriltians againll lillening to their fuggeltions, and being thereby perverted from the faith and purity of the gofpel. 2jS The Apocalypfe or Revelation has not always been The Apo- unanimoully received as the genuine production of thecal^Pfe‘. Its apoltle John. Its authenticity is proved, however, by the tellimony of many refpeClable authors of the firllVed/ centuries. It is referred to by the martyrs of Lyons : it was admitted by Jultin Martyr as the work of the apoltle John. It is often quoted by Irenaeus, by The- ophilus bilhop of Antioch, by Clement of Alexandria, by Tertullian, by Origen, and by Cyprian of Carthage. It was alfo received by heretics, by Novatus and his fol¬ lowers, by the Donatills, and by the Arians. For the firlt two centuries no part of the New Teltament was more univerfally acknowledged, or mentioned with higher refpedt. But a difpute having arifen about the millennium, Caius with fome others, about the year 212, to end the controverfy as fpeedily and effeCtually as poflible, ventured to deny the authority of the book which had given occafion to it. The book of Revelation, as we learn from Rev. i. 9. The date was written in the ifle of Patmos. According to th©of it* general tellimony of ancient authors, John was baniffied into Patmos in the reign of Domitian, and reltored by his fucceffor Nerva. But the book could not be pu- blifhed till after John’s releafe, when he returned to E- phefus. As Domitian died in 96, and his perfecution did not commence till near the end of his reign, the Re¬ velation might therefore be publilhed in 96'or 97. Here we ffiould conclude j but as the curious reader Percy's may defire to be informed hovr the predictions revealed Key to the in this book of St John have ufually been interpretedTe~ and applied, wTe lhall confiltently with our fubjeft {u\)-ment' join a key to the prophecies contained in the Revelation. This is extracted from the learned differtations of Dr Newton, bilhop of Briltol (1) : to which the reader is referred for a more full illultration of the feveral parts, as the concifenefs of our plan only admits a fhort ana¬ lyfis or abridgment of them. 140 Nothing of a prophetical nature occurs in the firlt three Dr New- chapters, except, 1. What is laid concerning the church t?”,s of Ephefus, that her “ candleltick ihall be removed out thep^o- ° of its place,” which is now verified, not only in this, butphecies in all the other Afiatic churches which exifted at that which have time $ the light of the gofpel having been taken from^ee“ a‘" them, not only by their herefies and divifions from with-^.4^’^ in, but by the arms of the Saracens from without : And, 2. Concerning the church of Smyrna, that IHe {hall “ have tribulation ten days j” that is, in prophetic lan- guage, (1) Differtations on the prophecies which have remarkably, been fulfilled, and at this time are fulfilling, in the* world, vol. iii. 8vo. 2 SCR [ 48 1Pture- guagej ten years 5” referring to the perfecution of Diocletian, which alone of all the general perfecutions lafted fo long. The next fiye chapters relate to the opening of the Seven Seals ; and by thefe feals are intimated fo many different periods of the prophecy. Six of thefe feals are opened in the fixth and feventh chapters. The JirJl feal or period is memorable for conquefts. It commences with Vefpafian, and terminates in Nerva j and during this time Judea was fubjugated. The fe- condfeal is noted for war and daughter. It commences with Trajan, and continues through his reign, and that of his fucceffors. In this period, the Jews were entire¬ ly routed and dilperfed j and great was the daughter and devadation occafioned by the contending parties. The third feal is characterifed by a rigorous execution of judice, and an abundant provifion of corn, wine, and oil. It commences with Septimius Severus. He and Alexander Severus were juff and fevere emperors, and at the fame time highly celebrated for the regard they paid to the felicity of their people, by procur¬ ing them plenty of every thing, and particularly corn, wine, and oil. This period lafted during the reigns of the Septimian family. The fourth feal is di- *ftinguiftied by a concurrence of evils, fuch as war, fa¬ mine, peftilence, and wild beafts j by all which the Ro¬ man empire wras remarkably infefted from the reign of Maximin to that of Diocledan. The fifth feal begins at Dioclefian, and is fignali'Zed by the great perfecution, from whence arofe that memorable era, the Era of Martyrs. With Conftantine begins the fixth feal, a period of revolutions, pi&ured forth by great commo¬ tions in earth and in heaven, alluding to the fubverfion of Paganifm and the eftablifhment of Chriftianity. This period lafted from the reign of Conftantine the Great to that of Theodofius the Firft. The feventh feal includes under it the remaining parts of the prophecy, and com¬ prehends feven periods diftinguifhed by the founding of feven trumpets. As the feals foretold the ftate of the Roman empire before and till it became Chriftian, fo the trumpets fore- Ihow the fate of it afterwards ; each trumpet being an alarm to one nation or other, roufing them up to over- throw that empire. Four of thefe trumpets are founded in the eighth chapter. At the founding of the firft, Alaric and his Goths invade the Roman empire, befiege Rome twice, and fet it on fire in feveral places. At the founding of the fe- cond, Attila and his Huns wafte the Roman provinces, and compel the eaftern emperor Theodofius the Second, and the weftern emperor Valentinian the Third, to fub- mit to fhameful terms. At the founding of the third, Genferic and his Vandals arrive from Africa j fpoil and plunder Rome, and fet fail again with immenfe wealth and innumerable captives. At the founding of the fourth, Odoacer and the Heruli put an end to the very name of the weftern empire 5 Theodoric founds the kingdom of the Oftrogoths in Italy \ and at laft Italy becomes a province of the eaftern empire, Rome being governed by a duke under the exarch of Ravenna. As the foregoing trumpets relate chiefly to the downfal of the weftern empire, fo do the following to that of the eaftern. They are founded in the ninth, tenth, and .part of the eleventh chapters. At the founding of the ] SCR fifth trumpet, Mahomet, that blazing ftar, appears, opens Scripture, the bottomlefs pit, and with his locufts the Arabians vt—«■ darkens the fun and air. And at the founding of the fixth, a period not yet finilhed, the four angels, that is, the four fultans, or leaders of the Turks and Othmans, are loofed from the river Euphrates. The Greek or Eaftern empire was cruelly “ hurt and tormented” un¬ der the fifth trumpet; but under the fixth, was “ flain,” and utterly deftroyed. I he Latin or Weftern Church not being reclaimed by the ruin of the Greek or Eaftern, but ftill perfifting in their idolatry and wickednefsj at the beginning of the tenth chapter, and under the found of this fixth trumpet, is introduced a vifion preparative to the prophecies re- fpeding the Weftern Church, wherein an angel is repre- fented, having in his hand a little book, or codicil, de- feribing the calamities that fhould overtake that church. The meafuring of the temple (hows, that during all this period there will be fome true Chriftians, who will con¬ form themfelves to the rule of God’s word, even whilft the outer court, that is, the external and more extenfive part of this temple or church, is trodden under foot by Gentiles, z. e. fuch Chriftians as, in their idolatrous worfhip and perfecuting practice, referable and outdo the Gentiles themfelves. Yet againft thefe corrupters of re¬ ligion there will always be fome true witneffes to proteft, who, however they may be overborne at times, and in appearance reduced to death, yet will arife again from time to time, till at laft they triumph and glorioufly afeend. The eleventh chapter concludes with the found¬ ing of the feventh trumpet. In the twelfth diapter, by the woman bearing a man- child is to be underftood the Chriftian church j by the great red dragon, the heathen Roman empire ; by the man-child whom the woman bore, Conftantine the Great 5 and by the war in heaven, the contefts between the Chriftian and Heathen religions. In the thirteenth chapter, by the beaft with feven heads and ten horns, unto whom the dragon gave his power, feat, and great authority, is to be underftood, not Pagan but Chriftian, not imperial but papal Rome j in fubmitting to whofe religion, the world did in effeft fubmit again to the religion of the dragon. The ten¬ horned beaft therefore reprefents the Romifti church and ftate in general: but the beaft with two horns like a lamb is the Roman clergy •, and that image of the ten-horned beaft, which the two-horned beaft caufed to be made, and infpired with life, is the pope j rvhofe number is 666, according to the numerical powers of the letters conftituting the Roman name Axlttto;, Latinus, or its equivalent in Hebrew, n"m“i Romith. 30 I 300 5 10 50 7° 200 200 n 6 t 40 10 v 10 ' 400 n 666 666 Chapter xiv. By the lamb on Mount Sion is meant Jefus •, by the hundred forty and four tboufand, his church and follorVers, by the angel preaching the ever- lafting SCR t 49 ] S C U Scripture lading gofpel, the firft principal elFort made towards a II reformation by that public oppofition formed againil the -Scruple. . 0f faints and images by emperors and biihops in the eighth and ninth centuries; by the angel crying, “ Babylon is fallen,” the Waldenfes and Albigenfes, ivho pronounced the church of Rome to be the A- pocalyptic Babvlon, and denounced her deftrutlion j and by the third angel Martin Luther and his fellow reformers, who protefted againil; all the corruptions of the church of Rome as deitructive to falvation. For an account of the doctrines and precepts contained in the Scriptures, fee Theology. For proofs of their divine origin, fee Religion, Prophecy, and Mira¬ cles. SCRIVENER, one who draws contrails, or whofe bufinefs it is to place money at intered. If a fcrivener be entrufted with a bond, he may receive the intereft; and if he fail, the obligee (hall bear the lofs: ?nd fo it is if he receive the principal and deliver up the bond; for being entrufted with the fecurity itfelf, it muft be prefumed that he is trufted with power to receive inte¬ reft or principal; and the giving up the bond on pay¬ ment of the money fhail be a difcharge thereof. But If a fcrivener fhall be entrufted with a mortgage-deed, he hath only authority to receive the intereft, not the principal; the giving up the deed in this cafe not being fufficient to reftore the eftate, but there muft be a re¬ conveyance, &c. It is held, where a fcrivener puts out his client’s money on a bad fecurity, which upon in¬ quiry might have been eafily found fo, yet he cannot in equity be charged to anfwer for the money ; for it is here faid, no one would venture to put out money of another upon a fecurity, if he were obliged to warrant and make it good in cafe a lofs Ihould happen, without any fraud in him. SCROBICULUS cordis, the fame as Anticar- DIUM.. SCROFANELLO, in Ichthyology, a name by which fome have called a fmall filh of the Mediterra¬ nean, more ufually known by the name of the fcor- periia. SCROLL, in Heraldry. See that article, chap. iv. fe- not folely from idbia- tiy; TS the art of carving wood or hewing ftone into images. It is an art of the moll remote antiquity, being praftifed, as there is reafon to believe, before the general deluge. We are induced to affign to it this early origin, by confidering the expedients by which, in the firft ftages of fociety, men have every where fupplied the place of alphabetic characters. Thefe, it is univerfally known, have been piCture-writing, fuch as that of the Mexicans, which, in the progrefs of refinement and knowledge, was gradually improved into the hierogly¬ phics of the Egyptians and other ancient nations. See Hieroglyphics. That mankind Ihould have lived near 1700 years, from the creation of the world to the flood of Noah, without falling upon any method to make their concep¬ tions permanent, or to communicate them to a diftance, is extremely improbable ; efpecially when we call to mind that fuch methods of writing have been found, in modern times, among people much lefs enlightened than thofe mufl: have been who rvere capable of building fuch a veffel as the ark. But if the antediluvians were acquainted with any kind of writing, there can be little doubt of its being,hieroglyphical writing. Mr Bryant has proved th&t the Chaldeans were poffeffed of that art before the Egyptians 5 and Berofus * informs us, that a delineation of all the monftrous forms which inhabit¬ ed the chaos, wrhen this earth was in that Hate, was to be feen in the temple of Belus in Babylon. This deli¬ neation, as he defcribes it, mufl: have been a hiflory in hieroglyphical chara&ers ; for it confifted of human fi¬ gures with wings, with two heads, and fome with the horns and legs of goats. This is exaftly fimilar to the hieroglyphical writing of the Egyptians 5 and it was preferved, our author fays, both in drawings and engra¬ vings in the temple of the god of Babylon. As Chal¬ dea was the firft peopled region of the earth after the flood, and as it appears from Pliny f, as well as from Berofus, that the art of engraving on bricks baked in the fun was there carried to a confiderable degree of perfeftion at a very early period, the probability cer¬ tainly is, that the Chaldeans derived the art of hiero¬ glyphical writing, and confequently the rudiments of the art of fculpture, from their antediluvian anceftors. It is generally thought that fculpture had its origin from idolatry, as it w'as found neceffary to place before the people the images of their gods to enliven the fer¬ vour of their devotion : but this is probably a mxftake. The worlhip of the heavenly bodies, as the only gods of the heathen nations, prevailed fo long before the dei¬ fication of dead men was thought of (fee Polytheism), that we cannot fuppofe mankind to have been, during all that time, ignorant of the art of hieroglyphical xvri- ting. But the deification of departed heroes undoubt¬ edly gave rife to the almoft univerfal pra&ice of repre- fen'ing the gods by images of a human form j and therefore we muft conclude, that the elements of fculp¬ ture Avere known before that art was employed to enliven the devotion of idolatrous worlhippers. The pyramids and obeliflcs of Egypt, which were probably temples, or rather altars, dedicated to the fun (fee Pyramid), were covered from top to bottom Avith hieroglyphical emblems of men, beafts, birds, fillies, and reptiles, at a period prior to that in which there is any unexception¬ able evidence that mere itatue-AVorlhip prevailed even in that nurfery of idolatry. ^ But though it appears thus evident that pi&ure- though it writing was the firft employment of the fculptor, AveProbabIy are far from imagining that idolatrous Avorfliip did not ^°nctnbuted contribute to carry his art to that perfedlion which it the ar^to attaihed in fome of the nations of antiquity. Even in perfection. • the dark ages of Europe, Avhen the other fine arts Avere almoft extinguiftied, the mummery of the church of Rome, and the veneration which flie taught for her faints and martyrs, preferved among the Italians fome N veftiges of the fifter-arts of fculpture and painting j and therefore, as human nature is every Avhere the fame, it is reafonable to believe that a fimilar veneration for he¬ roes and demigods Avould, among the ancient nations, have a fimilar effeft. But if this be fo, the prefump- tion is, that the Chaldeans Avere the firft Avho invented the art of herving blocks of Avood and ftone into the fi¬ gures of men and other animals 5 for the Chaldeans were unqueftionably the firft idrdaters, and their early pro¬ grefs in fculpture is confirmed by the united teftimonies of Berofus, Alexander Polyhiftor, Apollodorus, and Pliny ; not to mention the eaftern tradition, that the father of Abraham Avas a ftatuary. ^ Againft this conclufion Mr Bromley, in his late Hi- Mr Brom- ftory of the Fine Arts, has urged fome plaufible argu- ley’5 theo- ments. In ftating thefe he profefies not to be original, *7’tbat or to derive his information from the fountain-head of v™sPinvent^ antiquity. He adopts, as he tells us, the theory of a ed by the French Avriter, Avho maintains, that in the year of the Scythians, world 1949, about 300 years after the deluge, the Scy¬ thians under Brouma, a defcendant of Magog the fon of Japhet, extended their conquefts over the greater part of Afia. According to this fyftem, Brouma was not only the civilizer of India, and the author of the brami- nical do&rines, but alfo diffufed the principles of the Scythian mythology over Egypt, Phoenicia, Greece, and the continent of Afia. Of thefe principles Mr Bromley has given us no di- ftindl enumeration ; the account which he gives of them is not to be found in one place, but to be collefted from a variety of diftant paflages. In attempting therefore to prefent the fubftance of his fcattered hints in one vieAV, avc Avill not be confident that avc have omitted none of them. The ox, fays he, Avas the Scythian em¬ blem of the generator of animal life, and hence it be¬ came the principal divinity of the Arabians. The fer- pent was the fymbol of the fource of intelligent nature. Thefe Avere the common points of union in all the firft religions SCULPTURE. 5f religions of the earth. From Egypt the Ifraelites car¬ ried with them a religious veneration for the ox and the ferpent. Their veneration for the ox appeared foon af¬ ter they marched into the Avildernefs, when in the ab- fence of Mofes they called upon Aaron to make them gods which flrould go before them. The idea of ha¬ ving an idol to go before them, fays our author, was completely Scythian •, for fo the Scythians afted in all their progrefs through Alia, with this difference, that their idol Avas a living animal. The Ifraelites having gained their favourite god, Avhich Avas an ox (not a calf as it is rendered in the book of Exodus), next proceed¬ ed to hold a feftival, which Avas to be accompanied Avith dancing ♦, a fpec’Ts of gaiety common in the fefti- vals Avhich were held in adoration of the emblematic Urotal or ox in that very part of Arabia near Mount Sinai Avhere this event took place. It is mentioned too as a curious and important fa£t, that the ox Avhich Avas revered in Arabia Avas called Adonau According¬ ly Aaron announcing the feaft to the ox or golden calf, fpeaks thus, to-morrow is a feajl to Adonai, which is in our tranflation rendered to the lord. In the time of Jeroboam avc read of the golden calves fet up as objects of Avorfliip at Bethel and Dan. Nor was the reverence paid to the ox confined to Scythia, to Egypt, and to Afia •, it extended much farther. The ancient Cimbri, as the Scythians did, carried an ox of bronze before them on all their expeditions. Mr Bromley alfo informs us, that as great refpe£t Avas paid to the living ox among the Greeks as Avas offered to its fymbol among other na¬ tions. The emblem of the ferpent, continues Mr Bromley, Avas marked yet more decidedly by the exprefs direc¬ tion of the Almighty. That animal had ever been confidered as emblematic of the fupreme generating power of intelligent life : And Avas that idea, fays he, difcouraged, fo far as it Avent to be a fign or fymbol of life ? when God faid to Mofes, “ Make thee a brazen ferpent, and fet it on a pole, and it fhall come to pafs that every one Avho is bitten, Avhen he looketh on it, ftiall live.” In Egypt the ferpent furrounded their Ifis and Ofiris, the diadems of their princes, and the bon¬ nets of their priefts. Theferpents made a diftinguifhed figure in Grecian fculpture. The fable of Echidne, the mother of the Scythians, gave her figure termina¬ ting as a ferpent to all the founders of ftates in Greece ; from Avhich their earlieft fculptors reprefented in that form the Titan princes, Cecrops, Draco, and even Eric- thonius. Befides the fpear of the image of Minerva, Avhich Phidias made for the citadel of Athens, he pla¬ ced a ferpent, Avhich Avas fuppofed to guard that god- defs. The ferpent Avas combined Avith many other figures. It fometimes Avas coiled round an egg as an emblem of the creation j fometimes round a trident, to fhoAV its power over the fea ; fometimes it encircled a flambeau, to reprefent life and death. In Egypt, as Avell as in Scythia and India, the di¬ vinity Avas reprefented on the leaves of the tamara or lotus. Pan Avas Avorfhipped as a god in that country, as Avell as over the eaft. Their fphinxes, and all their combined figures of animal creation, took their origin from the mother of the Scythians, Avho brought forth an offspring that Avas half a woman and half a ferpent. Their pyramids and obelifks arofe from the idea of flame j the firft emblem of the fupreme principle, introduced by the Scythians, and which even the influence of Zoroa- fter and the Magi could not remove. We are told that the Bacchus of the Greeks is de¬ rived from the Brouma of the Indians 5 that both are reprefented as feated on a fAvan fwimming over the waves, to indicate that each A\*as the god of humid^ na¬ ture, not the god of Avine, but the god of waters. Ihe mitre of Bacchus Avas fhaped like half an egg 5 an em¬ blem taken from this circumflance, that at the creation the egg from Avhich all things fprung was divided in the middle. Pan alfo was revered among the Scythians j and from that people Avefe derNed all the emblems by which the Greeks reprefented this divinity. It Avould be tedious to follovv our author through the Avhole of this fubjedt $ and Avere avc to fubmit to the la¬ bour of colledting and arranging his fcattered materials, avc fhould flill vieAV his fyflem Avith fome degree of fuf- picion. It is drawn, as he informs us, from the Avork of M. D’Ancarville, intitled, Recherches fur ROrigine, RE/prit, et les Prog res, des Arts de la Grece. 5 To form conclufions concerning the origin of nations,ll1 founded, the rife and progrefs of the arts and fciences, without the aid of hiftorical evidence, by analogies which are fometimes accidental, and often fanciful, is a mode of reafoning which cannot readily be admitted. 1 here may indeed, avc acknoAVledge, be refemblances in the re¬ ligion, language, manners, and cuftoms, of different na¬ tions, fo ftriking and fo numerous, that to doubt of their being defcended from the fame ftock would favour of fcepticifm. But hiftorical theories muft not be adopt¬ ed raftily. We muft be certain that the evidence is credible and fatisfa&ory before avc proceed to deduce any conclufions. We muft firft knovv Avhether the Scythian hiftory itfelf be authentic, before Ave make , any comparifon Avith the hiftory of other nations. But what is called the Scythian hiftory, every man of learn¬ ing knoAvs to be a colleftion of fables. Herodotus and Juftin are the tAvo ancient Avriters from whom Ave have the fulleft account of that AA'arlike nation ; but thefe tAvo hiftorians contraditt each other, and both Avrite what cannot be believed of the fame people at the fame pe¬ riod of their progrefs. Juftin tells us, that there Avas a long and violent conteft between the Scythians and E- gyptians about the antiquity of their refpeftive nations ; and after ftating the arguments on each fide of the que- ftion, Avhich, as he gives them * , are nothing to the pur- * Lib. u. pofe, he decides in favour of the claim of the Scy-caP-*’ thians. Herodotus Avas too partial to the Egyptians, not to give them the palm of antiquity : and he Avas probably in the right j for Juftin defcribes his moft an¬ cient of nations, even in the time of Darius Hyftafpes, as ignorant of all the arts of civil life. “ They occu¬ pied their land in common (fays he), and cultivated none of it. They had no houfes nor fettled habitations, but Avandered Avith their cattle from defert to defert. In thefe rambles they carried their wives and children in tumbrels covered Avith the {kins of beafts, which fer- ved as houfes to proteft them from the {forms of win¬ ter. They Avere without laAVs, governed by the dictates of natural equity. They coveted not gold or filver like the reft of mankind, and lived upon milk and honey. Though they Avere expofed to extreme cold, and had abundance of flocks, they kneAv not hoAV to make gar¬ ments of avooI, but clothed themfelves in the {kins of G 2 wild 52 ■f Lib. ii. cap. a. } Lib. v i. $ Lib. iv. cap. 62. 6 Egyptian icuipture. SCULP 'ivild bcafts f.” This is the mbft favourable account which any ancient writer gives of the Scythians. By Strabo J and Herodotus § they are reprefented as the moft favage of mortals, delighting in war and bloodfhed, cutting the throats of all ftrangeys who came among them, eating their flefli, and making cups and pots of their Ikulls. Is it conceivable that fuch favages could be fculptors •, or that, even fuppofing their manners to have been fuch as Juflin reprefents them, a people fo ilmple and ignorant could have impofed their mytho- logy upon the Chaldeans, Phenicians, and Egyptians, whom wre know by the moft incontrovertible evidence to have been great and poliihed nations fo early as in the days of Abraham ? No ! We could as foon admit other novelties of more importance, with which the French of the prefent age pretend to enlighten the world, as this origin afiigned by Mr Bromley to the art of fculpture, unlefs fupported by better authority than that of D’Ancarville. The inference of our author from the name of the facred ox in Arabia, and from the dancing and gaiety which were common in the religious feftivals of the Arabians, appears to us to be very haftily drawn. At the early period of the departure of the Ifraelites from Egypt, the language of the Hebrews, Egyptians, and Arabians, differed not more from each other than do the different diale£!s of the Greek tongue which are found in the poems of Homer (fee Philology, Se6t. III.) ; and it is certain, that for many years after the formation of the golden-calf, the Hebrews were ftran- gers to every fpecies of idolatry but that which they had brought with them from their houfe of bondage. See Remphan. Taking for granted, therefore, that the Scythians did not impofe their mythology on the eaftern nations, and that the art of fculpture, as well as hieroglyphic writing and idolatrous worlhip, prevailed firft among the Chal¬ deans, we (hall endeavour to trace the progrefs of this art through fome other nations of antiquity, till we bring it to Greece, where it was carried to the higheft perfec¬ tion to which it has yet attained. The firft intimation that we have of the art of fculp¬ ture is in the book of Genelis, where we are informed, that when Jacob, by the divine command, was return¬ ing to Canaan, his wife Rachel carried along with her the teraphim or idols of her father. Thefe we are af- fured were fmall, fince Rachel found it fo 'eafy to con¬ ceal them from her father, notwithftanding his anxious fearch. We are ignorant, however, how thefe images were made, or of what materials they were compofed. The firft perfon mentioned as an artift of eminence is Bezaleel, who formed the cherubims which covered the mercy-feat. The Egyptians alfo cultivated the art of fculpture ; but there were two circumftances wThich obftrufted its progrefs. 1. The perfons of the Egyptians were not poffeffed of the graces of form, of elegance, or of fym- metry •, and of confequence they had no perfeft ftandard to model their tafte. They refembled the Chinefe in the caft of their face, in their great bellies, and in the clumfv rounding of their contours. 2. They were re- ftrained by their laws to the principles and praftices of their anceftors, and were not permitted to introduce any innovations. Their ftatues were always formed in the fame ftiff attitude, with the arms hanging perpendicular- T U II E. ly down the fides. What perfection were they capable of who knew no other attitude than that of chairmen ? So far were they from attempting any improvements, that in the time of Adrian the art continued in the fame rude date as at firft j and ■when their llavifli adu¬ lation for that emperor induced them to place the fta- tue of his favourite Antinous among the objefts of their worlhip, the fame inanimate ftiffnefs in the atti¬ tude of the body and pofition of the arms was obferved. We believe it will fcarcely be neceffary to inform our readers that the Egyptian ftatue juft now mentioned is very different from the celebrated ftatue of Antinousj of which fo many moulds have been taken that imita¬ tions of it are notv to be met with almoft in every cabi¬ net in Europe. Notwithftanding the attachment of the Egyptians to ancient ufages, Winkelman thinks he has difcovered two different ftyles of fculpture which prevailed at different periods. The firfb of thefe ends with the conqueft of Egypt by Cambyfes. The fecond begins at that time, and extends beyond the reign of Alexander the Great. ^ In the firft ftyle, the lines which form the contour are ftvle, ftraight and projefting a little ; the pofition is ftiff and unnatural ; In fitting figures the legs are parallel, the feet fqueezed together, and the arms fixed to the fides j but in the figures of women the left arm is folded acrofs the bread •, the bones and mufcles are faintly difcernible j the eyes are flat and looking obliquely, and the eyebrow's funk—features which deftroy entirely the beauty of the head 5 the. cheek-bones are high, the chin fmall and piked *, the ears are generally placed higher than in na¬ ture, and the feet are too large and flat In (hort, if we are to look for any model in the ftatues of Egypt, it is not for the model of beauty but of deformity. The ftatues of men are naked, only they have a (hort ;apron, and a few folds of drapery furrounding their waift : The veftments of women are only didingui(liable by the border, which rifes a little above the furface of the ftatue. In this age it is evident the Egyptians knew little of drapery. g Of the fecond ftyle of fculpture praftifed among the Second Egyptians, Winkelman thinks he has found fpecimens ftyle. in the twro figures of bafaltes in the Capitol, and in an¬ other figure at Villa Albani, the head of which has been renewed. The firft two of thefe, he remarks, bear vifible traces of the former ftyle, which appear efpecial- ly in the form of the mouth and (hortnefs of the chin. The hands poffefs more elegance j and the feet are placed at a greater diftance from each other, than was cuftomary in more ancient times. In the firft and third figures the arms hang down clofe to the fides. In the fecond they hang more freely. Winkelman fufpefts that thefe three ftatues have been made after the con¬ queft of Egypt by the Greeks. They are clothed with a tunic, a robe, and a mantle. The tunic, which is puckered into many folds, defcends from the neck to the ground. The robe in the firfl: and third ftatues feems clofe to the body, and is only perceptible by fome little folds. It is tied under the bread, and cover¬ ed by the mantle, the two buttons of which are placed under the epaulet. The Antinous of the Capitol is compofed of two pieces, which are joined under the haunches. But as all the Egyptian ftatues which now remain have been hewn out of one block, we muft: believe that Diodorus, in 53 SCULP in faying the ftone was divided, and each half hnilhed by a feparate artizan, fpoke only of a coloffus. T. he fame author informs us, that the Egyptians divided the human body into 24^ parts 5 but it is to be regretted that he has not given a more minute detail of that di- vifion. The Egyptian ftatues were not only formed by the chifel, they were alfo polilhed with great care. Even thofe on the fummit of an obeliik, which could only be viewed at a diftance, were finifhed with as much labour and care as if they had admitted a dole infpeftion. As they are generally executed in granite or bafaltes, flones of a very hard texture, it is impoflible not to admire the indefatigable patience of the artifts. The eye was often of different materials from the reft of the flatue; fometimes it was compofed of a precious ftone or metal. We are allured that the valuable dia¬ mond of the emprefs of Ruflia, the largeft and molt beautiful hitherto known, formed one of the eyes of the famous ftatue of Scheringham in the temple of Brama. Thofe Egyptian ftatues which ftill remain are com¬ pofed of wood or baked earth : and the ftatues of earth are covered with green enamel. Phenitian The Phenicians poffeffed both a charafler and fitua- fculpture. tion highly favourable to the cultivation of ftatuary. They had beautiful models in their own perfons, and their induftrious charafler qualified them to attain per- feflion in every art for which they had a tafte. I heir fituation raifed a fpirit of commerce, and commerce in¬ duced them to cultivate the arts, i heir temples fhone with ftatues and columns of gold, and a profufion of emeralds was everywhere fcattered. Ail the great works of the Phenicians have been unfortunately deftroyed ; but many of the Carthaginian medals are ftill preferved, ten of which are depofited in the cabinet of the grand duke of Florence. But though the Carthaginians were a colony of Phenicians, we cannot from their works IO judge of the merit of their anceftors. This art not The Perfians made no diftinguilhed figure in the arts cultivated 0f defign. They were indeed fenfible to the charms of among the beauty? blit they did not ftudy to imitate them. Their PeiTians. con{ifted of long flowing robes concealing the whole perfon, prevented them from attending to the beauties of form. Their religion, too, which taught them to worfhip the divinity in the emblem of fire, and that it was impious to reprefent him under a human form, feemed almoft to prohibit the exercife of this art, by taking away thofe motives which alone could give it dignity and value 5 and as it was not cuftomary among them to raife ftatues to great men, it was impoflible that IX ftatuary could flourifti in Perfii. Etrurian The Etrurians or ancient Tufeans, in the opinion of fcutpture. Winkelman, carried this art to feme degree of perrec- tion at an earlier period than the Greeks. It is faid to have been introduced before the fiege of Troy by De- dalus, who, in order to efcape the refentment of Minos king of Crete, took refuge in Sicily, from whence he paffed into Italy, where he left many monuments of his art. Paufanias and Diodorus Siculus informs us, that Fotne works aferibed by him were to be feen when they wrote, and that thefe poffefled that charafter of ma- jefty which afterwards diftinguifhed the labours of Etruria. A character ftrongly marked forms the chief diftinc- T U R E, tion in thofe productions of Etruria which have defeend- ed to us. Their ftyle was indeed harlh and overchar¬ ged j a fault alfu committed by Michael Angelo, the celebrated painter of modern Etruria; for it is not to be fuppofed that a people of fuch rude manners as the Etrurians could communicate to their works that vivid- nefs and beauty which the elegance of Grecian man¬ ners infpired. On the other hand, there are many of the Tufcan ftatues which bear fo clofe a refemblance to thofe of Greece, that antiquarians have thought it probable that they were conveyed from that country, or Magna Graecia, into Etruria, about the time of the Roman conqueft, when Italy was adorned with the fpoils of Greece. . l2 Among the monuments of Etrurian art two different F;rft ftylei- ftyles have been obferved. In the firft the lines are ftraight, the attitude ftiff, and no idea of beauty ap¬ pears in the formation of the head. The contour is not v-ell rounded, and the figure is too flender. The head is oval, the chin piked, the eyes flat, and looking afquint. Thefe are the defedls of an art in a ftate of infancy, which an accomplifhed mafter could never fall into, and are equally confpicuous in Gothic ftatues as in the pro¬ ductions of the ancient natives of Florence. They re¬ ferable the ftyle of the Egyptians fo much, that one is almoft induced to fuppofe that there had once been a communication between thefe two nations ; but others think that this ftyle Avas introduced by Dedalus. . jj Winkelman fuppofes that the fecond epoch of this Second art commenced in Etruria, about the time at which itftyle* had reached its greateft perfection in Greece, in the age of Phidias •, but this conjeCture is not fupported by any proofs.. To deferibe the fecond ftyle of fculpture among the Etrurians, is almoft the fame as to deferibe the ftyle of Michael Angelo and his numerous imita¬ tors. ^ The joints are ftrongly marked, the mufcles raifed, tlm bones diftinguifliable j but the whole mien harfti. In defigning the bone of the leg, and the fepa- ration of the mufcles of the calf, there is an elevation and ftrength above life'. - The ftatues of the gods are de- figned with more delicacy. In forming them, the ar¬ tifts were anxious to fliow that they could exercife their power without that violent diftenfion of the mufcles which is neceffary in the exertions of beings merely human ; but in general their attitudes are unnatural, and the aClions ftrained. If a ftatue, for infiance, hold ai>y thing Avith its fore fingers, the reft are ftretched out in a ftiff pofition. According to ancient hiftpry, the Greeks did not emerge from the favage ftate till a long time after the Egyptians, Chaldeans, and Indians, had arrived at a confiderable degree of civilization. The original rude inhabitants of Greece Avere civilized by colonies Avhich arrived among them, at different times, from Egypt and Phenicia. Thefe brought along Avith them the re¬ ligion, the letters, and the arts of their parent coun¬ tries : and if fculpture had its origin from the Avorfhip of idols, there is reafon to believe that it Avas one of the arts which were thus imported j for that the gods of Greece Avere of Egyptian and Phenician extraCfion is a fad incontrovertible; (fee Mysteries, Mytho¬ logy, Philology, Seft. VII. Philosophy, N° 19, and Titan). The original ftatues of the gods, how¬ ever, were very rude. Tke earlieft; objeCls of idolatrous worftup 54 SCULP Worftup have everywhere been the heavenly bodies j and the fymbols confecrated to them were generally pil¬ lars of a conical or pyramidal figure. It was not till hero-worfhip was engrafted on the planetary, that the Iculptor thought of giving to the facred ftatue any part of the human form (fee POLYTHEISM, N° 19, 23.) •, and it appears to have been about the era of their revolution in idolatry that the art of fculpture was introduced among the Greeks. The firlt reprefentations of their gods were round ftones placed upon cubes or pillars j and thefe ftones they afterwards formed roughly, fo as to give them fotnething of the appearance of a head. Agreeable to this defcription was a Jupiter, which Pau- fanias faw in Tegeum, in Arcadia. Thefe repi*< fenta- tions were called Hermes ; not that they reprefented Mercury, but from the word Herma, which fignified a rough done. It is the name which Homer gives to the ftones which were ufed to fix veffels to the fhore. Paufanias faw at Pheres 30 deities made of unformed blocks or cubical ftones. The Lacedaemonians repre¬ fented Caftor and Pollux by two parallel pofts ; and a •tranfverfe beam was added, to exprefs their mutual af- feftion. If the Greeks derived from foreign nations the rudi¬ ments of the arts, it muft redound much to their ho¬ nour, that in a few centuries they carried them to fuch •wonderful perfeftion as entirely to eclipfe the fame of ■their mafters. It is by tracing the progrefs of fculpture among them that we are to ftudy the hiftory of this art; and we (hall fee its origin and fucceflive improvements correfpond with nature, which always operates flowly and gradually. View of Grecian Sculpture. Caufes^ The great fuperiority of the Greeks in the’ art of which pro-'fculpture may be afcribed to a variety of caufes. The moted thej -influence of climate over the human body is fo ftriking, ture°i ^CU^” tbat it muft have fixed the attention of every thinking Greece. man wh° has reflected on the fubjedl. The violent heats of the torrid zone, and the excelfive cold of the polar regions, are unfavourable to beauty. It is only in the mild climates of the temperate regions that it appears in its moft attractive charms. Perhaps no country in the world enjoys a more ferene air, lefs taint¬ ed with mill and vapours, or poffeffes in a higher degree that mild and genial warmth which can unfold and ex¬ pand the human body into all the fymmetry of mufcular ftrength, and all the delicacies of female beauty in great¬ er perfection, than the happy climate of Greece •, and never was there any people that had a greater tafte for beauty, or were more anxious to improv* it. Of the four wilhes of Simonides, the fecond was to have a hand- fome figure. The love of beauty was fo great among the Lacedaemonian women, that they kept in their chambers the ftatues of Nereus, of Narciffus, of Hya- cinthus, and of Caftor and Pollux j hoping that by often contemplating them they might have beautiful children. x There was a variety of circumftances in the noble and virtuous freedom of the Grecian manners that rendered thefe models of beauty peculiarly fubfervient to the cultivation of the fine arts. There were no tyrannical laws, as among the Egyptians, to check their progrefs. They had the beft opportunities to ftudy them in the 2 T U R E. public places, where the youth, who needed no other veil than chaftity and purity of manners, performed their various exercifes quite naked. They had the ftrongeft motives to cultivate fculpture, for a ftatue was the high- eft honour which public iperit could attain. It was an honour ambitioufly fought, and granted only to thofe who had diftinguiflied themfelves in the eyes of their fellow citizens. As the Greeks preferred natural qua¬ lities to acquired accomplifhments, they decreed the firft rewards to thofe who excelled in agility and ftrength of body. Statues were often raifed to wreftlers. Even the moft eminent men of Greece, in their youth, fought renown in gymnaftic exercifes. Chryfippus and Cle- anthes diftinguithed themfelves in the public games be¬ fore they were known as philofophers. Plato appeared as a wreftler both at the Ifthmian and Pythian games j and Pythagoras carried off the prize at Elis, (fee Py¬ thagoras). The paflion by which they were infpired was the ambition of having their ftatues erefted in the moft facred place of Greece, to be feen and admired by the whole people. The number of ftatues eredted on different occafions was immenfe ; of courfe the number of artifts muft have been great, their emulation ardent, and their progrefs rapid. As moft of their ftatues were decreed for thofe who vanquilhed in the public games, the artifts had the op¬ portunity of feeing excellent models ; for thofe who furpaffed in running, boxing, and wreftling, muft in ge¬ neral have been well formed, yet would exhibit different kinds of beauty. The high eftimation in which fculptors were held was very favourable to their art. Socrates declared the artifts the only wife men. An artift could be a legifla- tor, a Commander of armies, and might hope to have his ftatue placed befide thofe of Miltiades and Themif- tocles, or thofe of the gods themfelves. Befides, the honour and fuccefs of an artift did not depend on the caprice of pride or of ignorance. The productions of art were eftimated and rewarded by the greateft fages in the general affembly of Greece, and the fculptor who had executed his work with ability and tafte was confi¬ dent of obtaining immortality. It was the opinion of Winkelman, that liberty was highly favourable to this art j but, though liberty is ab- folutely neceffary to the advancement of fcience, it may be doubted whether the fine arts owe their improvement to it. Sculpture flouriftied moft in Greece, when Pe¬ ricles exerciled the pourer of a king j and in the reign of Alexander, when Greece was conquered. It attain¬ ed no perfeftion in Rome till Auguftus had enflaved the Romans. It revived in Italy under the patronage of the family of Medici, and'in France under the defpotic rule of Louis. XIV. It is the love of beauty, luxury, Avealth, or the patronage of a poAverful individual, that promotes the progrefs of this art. z ^ It Avill noAv be proper to give a particular account of(-recjan the ideas which the Greeks entertained concerning the ideas of ftandard of beauty in the different parts of the human l>eauty. body. And Avith refpeft to the head, the profile which l(t they chiefly admired is peculiar to dignified beauty. It Tha profile, eonfifts in a line almoft ftraight, or marked by fuch flight and gentle inflections as are fcarcely diftinguifh- able from a ftraight line. In the figures of Avomen and young perfons, the forehead and nofe form a line ap¬ proaching to a perpendicular. Ancient SCULP 17 Ancient writers, as well as artifls, affure us that the The fore- Greeks reckoned a {mall forehead a mark of beauty, hcad' and a high forehead a deformity. From the fame idea, the Circaffians wore their hair hanging down over their foreheads almoft to their eyebrows. To give an oval form to the countenance, it is neceffary that the hair (hould cover the forehead, and thus make a curve about the temples •, otherwife the face, which terminates in an oval form in the inferior part, will be angular in the higher part, and the proportion will be deftroyed. This rounding of the forehead may be feen in all handfome perfons, in all the heads of ideal beauty in ancient fta- tues, and efpecially in thofe of youth. It has been over¬ looked, however, by modern ilatuaries. Bernini, who modelled a ftatue of Louis XIV. in his youth, turned l8 back the hair from the forehead. The eyes. It is generally agreed that large eyes are beautiful; but their fize is of lefs importance in fculpture than their form, and the manner in which they are enchafed. In ideal beauty, the eyes are always funk deeper than they are in nature, and confequently the eyebrows have a greater proje&ion. But in large ftatues, placed at a certain diftance, the eyes, which are of the fame colour with the reft of the head, would have little effeft if they were not funk. By deepening the cavity of the eye, the ftatuary increafes the light and ftiade, and thus gives the head more life and expreflion. The fame praftice is ufed in fmall ftatues. The eye is a chara&eriftic feature in the heads of the different deities. In the ftatues of Apollo, Jupiter, and Juno, the eye is large and round. In thofe of Pallas they are alfo large ; but by lowering the eyelids, the virgin air and expreflion of mo- defty are delicately marked. Venus has fmall eyes, and the lower eyelid being raifed a little, gives them a lan- guilhing look and enchanting fweetnefs. It is only neceffary to fee the Venus de Medicis to be convinced that large eyes are not effential to beauty, efpecially if we compare her fmall eyes with thofe which refemble them in nature. The beauty of the eyebrows confxfts in the finenefs of the hair, and in the ftiarpnefs of the bone which covers them ; and mafters of the art con- fidered the joining of the eyebrows as a deformity, though it is fometimes to be met with in ancient fta- 10 tues* The mouth. The beauty of the mouth is peculiarly neceffary to conftitute a fine face. The lower lip muft be fuller than the upper, in order to give an elegant rounding to the chin. The teeth feldom appear, except in laugh¬ ing fatyrs. In human figures the lips are generally clofe, and a little opened in the figures of the gods. The lips of Venus are half open. In figures of ideal beauty, the Grecian artills never interrupted the rounding of the chin by introducing a dimple : for this they confidered not as a mark of beau¬ ty, and only to be admitted to diftinguifh individuals. The dimple indeed appears in fome ancient ftatues, but antiquaries fufpedl it to be the work of a modern hand. It is fufpe&ed alfo, that the dimple which is fometimes found on the cheeks of ancient ftatues is a modern inno¬ vation. Thee° ' Part t^ie ^eac^ WaS execute<^ ^7 t^e ancients 5' with more care than the ears, though little attention has been given to them by modern artifts. This chara&er is. fo decifive, that if we obferve in any ftatue that the ear* are not highly finiftied, but only roughly marked, T u R E. 55 we may conclude with certainty that we are examining a modern production. The ancients were very attentive to copy the precife form of the ear in taking likeneffes. Thus, where we meet with a head the ears of which have a very large interior opening, we know it to be the head of Marcus Aurelius. tr The manner in which the ancient artifts formed the The hair, hair alfo enables us to diftinguifti their works from thofe of the moderns. On hard and coarfe Hones the hair was fhort, and appeared as if it had been combed with a wide comb ; for that kind of ftone was difficult to work, and could not without immenfe labour be formed into curled and flowing hair. But the figures executed in marble in the molt flouriftiing period of the art have the hair curled and flowing •, at leaft where the head was not intended to be an exaft refemblance, for then the artift conformed to his model. In the heads of women, the hair was thrown back, and tied behind in a waving manner, leaving confiderable intervals ; which gives the agreeable variety of light and ffiade, and pro¬ duces the effeCts of the claro-obfcuro. ihe hair of the Amazons is difpofed in this manner. Apollo and Bac¬ chus have their hair falling down their ffioulders j and young perfons, till they arrived at manhood, wore their hair long. The colour of the hair which was reckon¬ ed moft beautiful, was fair ; and this they gave without diftinClion to the moft beautiful of their gods, Apollo and Bacchus, and likewife to their moft illuftrious he¬ roes. 23 Although the ravages of time have preferved but The hands, few of the hands or feet of ancient ftatues, it is evident from what remains how anxi©us the Grecian artifts were to give every perfection to thefe parts. The hands of young perfons were moderately plump, rvith little cavities or dimples at the joints of the fingers. The fingers tapered very gently from the root to the point, like well-proportioned columns, and the joints were fcarcely perceptible. The terminating joint was not bent, as it commonly appears in modern ftatues. 23 In the figures of young men the joints of the knee The legs are faintly marked. The knee unites the leg to the and feeU thigh without making any remarkable projections or cavities. The moft beautiful legs and beft-turned knees, according to Winkelman, are preferved in the Apollo Sauroclhones, in the Villa Borghefe ; in the Apollo which has a fwan at its feet •, and in the Bacchus of Vil¬ la Medicis. The fame able connoiffeur remarks, it is rare to meet with beautiful knees in young perfons, or in the elegant reprefentations of art. As the ancients did not cover the feet as we do, they gave to them the moft beautiful turning, and ftudied the form of them with the moft fcrupulous attention. 24 The breafts of men were large and elevated. TheThebreaft breafts of women did not poffefs much amplitude. The a«d figures of the deities have always the breafts of a virgin, l'ne the beauty of which the ancients made to confift in a gentle elevation. So anxious were the women to re¬ femble this ftandard, that they ufed feveral arts to re- ftrain the growth of their breafts. The breafts of the nymphs and goddeffes were never reprefented fwelling, becaufe that is peculiar to thofe women who fuckle. The paps of Venus contraCl and end in a point, this being confidered as an effential charaCleriftic of perfeCt beauty. Some of the moderns have tranfgreffed thefe rules, and have fallen into great improprieties. Tks 56 SCULP The lower part of the body in the ftatues of men was formed like that of the living body after a profound ileep and good digeftion. The navel was coniiderably 25 funk, efpecially in female ftatues. Ideal beau- As beauty never appears in equal perfedlion in every *7* part of the fame individual, perfect or ideal beauty can only be produeed by felecling the moft beautiful parts from different models *, but this muft be done with fuch judgment and care, that thefe detached beauties when united may form the moft exaft fymmetry. Yet the ancients fometimes confined themfelves to one indivi¬ dual, even in the moft fluurifhing age. Theodorus, whom Socrates and his difciples vifited, ferved as a mo¬ del to the artifts of his time. Phryne alfo appears to have been a model to the painters and fculptors. But Socrates, in his converfation with Parrhaftus, fays, that when a perfeft beauty was to be produced, the artifts joined together the moft ftriking beauties which could be collected from the fineft figures. We know that Zeuxis, when he was going to paint Helen, united in one picture all the beauties of the moft handfome women of Crotona. 26 The dra- The Grecian fculptors, who reprefented with fuch tues ^a" ^ucce^s the moft perfect beauty of the human form, were not regardlefs of the drapery of their ftatues. They clothed their figures in the moft proper ftuff, which they wrought into that ftiape which was beft calculated to give effect to their defign. The veftments of women in Greece generally con- fifted of linen cloth, or fome other light ftuff, and in latter times of filk and fometimes of woollen cloth. They had alfo garments embroidered with gold. In the works of fculpture, as well as in thofe of painting, one may diftinguifli the linen by its tranfparency and fmall united folds. The other light fluffs Avhich were worn by the women (a) were generally of cotton produced in the ifle of Cos *, and thefe the art of ftatuary was able to diftinguilh from the linen veftments. The cotton cloth was fometimes ftriped, and fometimes embellilhed with a profufion of flowers. Silk was alfo employed •, but whether it Avas known in Greece before the time of the Roman emperors cannot eafily be determined. In paint¬ ings, it is diftinguifhable by changing its colour in dif¬ ferent lights to red, violet, and fky-blue. There were two forts of purple } that which the Greeks called the colour of the fea, and Tyrian purple, which refembled lac. Woollen garments are eafily known by the ampli¬ tude of their folds. Befides thefe, cloth of gold fome-’ times compofed their drapery : but it was not like the modern fabric, confifting of a thread of gold or of filver fpun with a thread of filk $ it was compofed of gold or filver alone, without any mixture. The veftments of the Greeks, which deferve particu- 2^ lar attention, are the tunic, the robe, and the mantle. Tire tunic. The tunic was that part of the drefs which was next to the body. It may be feen in fleeping figures, or in thofe in difhabille ; as in the Flora Farnefe, and in the ftatues of the Amazons in the Capitol. The youngeft of the daughters of Niobe, who throws herfelf at her T U R E. mother’s fide, is clothed only with a tunic. It was of linen, or fome other light fluff, without fleeves, fixed to the fhoulders by a button, fo as to cover the whole breaft. None but the tunics of the goddefs Ceres and comedians have long ftraight fleeves. 2g The robes of women commonly confifted of two long The robe, pieces of woollen cloth, without any particular form, at¬ tached to the fhoulders by a great many buttons, and fometimes by a clafp. They had ftraight fleeves which came down to the wrifts. The young girls, as well as the women, faftened their robe to their fide by a cinc¬ ture, in the fame way as the high-prieft of the Jews faf¬ tened his, as it is ftill done in many parts of Greece. The cinfture formed on the fide a knot of ribbons fometimes refembling a rofe in fhape, which has been particularly remarked in the two beautiful daughters of Niobe. In the younger of thefe the cinffure is feen paf- fing over the fhoulders and the back. Venus has two cimftures, the one pafling over the fhoulder, and the other furrounding the waift. The latter is called cejlus -by the poets. 29 The mantle was called pcplon by the Greeks, which The man.« fignifies properly the mantle of Pallas. The name was tie- oftervvards applied to the mantles of the other gods, as well as to thofe of men. This part of the drefs was not fquare, as fome have imagined, but of a roundifh form. The ancients indeed fpeak in general of fquare mantles, but they received this ftiape from four taffels which were affixed to them ; two of thefe were vifible, and two were concealed under the mantle. The mantle was brought under the right arm, and over the left fhoulder j fometimes it was attached to the fhoulder by two buttons, as may be feen in the beautiful ftatue of Leucothoe at Villa Albani. go The colour of veftments peculiar to certain ftatues is The eolo«r too curious to be omitted. To begin with the figures of°ftheve^” the gods.—The drapery of Jupiter was red, that of Nep-mentb’ tune is fuppofed by Winkelman to have been fea-green. The fame colour alfo belonged to the Nereids and Nymphs. The mantle of Apollo was blue or violet. Bacchus was dreffed in white. Martianus Capella af- figns green to Cybele. Juno’s veftments were fky-blue, but flie fometimes had a white veil. Pallas was robed in a flame-coloured mantle. In a painting of Hercula¬ neum, Venus is in flowing drapery of a golden yellow. Kings were arrayed in purple ; priefts in white } and conquerors fometimes in fea-green. With refpett to the head, women generally were no covering but their hair ; when they wifhed to cover their head, they ufed the corner of their mantle.— Sometimes we meet with veils of a fine tranfparent tex- ture. Old women wore a kind of bonnet upon their head, an example of which may be feen in a ftatue in the Capitol, called the Prcefica; but Winkelman thinks it is a ftatue of Hecuba. The covering of the feet confifted of fhoes or fandals. The fandals were generally an inch thick, and compofed of more than one foie of cork. Thofe of Pallas in Villa Albani has two foies, and other ftatues had no lefs than five. Winkelman (a) Men fometimes wore cotton, but all who did fo were reckoned effeminate. S C U L I 31 Wink ELM AN lias afligned four different ftyles to this Four ftyles Xhe ancient ffyle, which continued until the time of this art p],jj;as . t]ie grarul ftyle, formed by that celebrated Greeks! C ftatuary ; the beautiful, introduced by Praxiteles, A- pelles, and Lyfippus ; and the imitative ftyle, praclifcd by thofe artifts who copied the works of the ancient mafters. The an- The moft authentic monuments of the ancient ftyle tient ftyle, are medals, containing an. infcription, which leads us back to very diftant times. The writing is from right to left in the Hebrew manner \ a ufage which was aban¬ doned before the time of Herodotus. The ftatue of Agamemnon at Elis, which was made by Ornatas, has an infcription from right to left. This artifan flourifti- ed 50 years before Phidias ; it is in the intervening pe¬ riod therefore between thefe two artifts, that we are to look for the ceffation of this prattice. The ftatues formed in the ancient ftyle were neither diftinguilhed by beauty of ftiape nor by proportion, but bore a clofe refemblance to thofe of the Egyptians and Etrurians (b) •, the eyes were long and Hat; the feriion of the mouth not horizontal ; the chin was pointed *, the curls of the hair were ranged in little rings, and refembled grains inclofed in a heap of raiftns. What was ftill worfe, it was impoftible by infpefting the head to diftin- guith the fex. The characters of this ancient ftyle were thefe : The defigning was energetic, but harih *, it was animated, but without gracefulnefs; and the violence of the ex- 23 preffion deprived the whole figure of beauty. The grand The grand ftyle was brought to perfection by Phi- dias, Polycletus, Scopas, Alcamenes, Myron, and other illuftrious artifts. It is probable, from fome paffages of ancient writers, that in this ftyle were preferved fome characters of the ancient manner, fuch as the ftraight lines, the fquares and angles. The ancient mafters, fuch as Polycletus, being the legiflators of proportions, fays Winkelman, and of confequence thinking they had a right to diftribute the meafures and dimenfions of the parts of .the human body, have undoubtedly facrificed fome degree of the form of beauty to a grandeur which is harfh, in comparifon of the flowing contours and graceful forms of their fucceffors.—The molt confider- able monuments of the grand ftyle_are the ftatues of Niobe and her daughters, and a figure of Pallas, to be feen in Villa Albani 5 which, however, muft not be confounded with the ftatue which is modelled according to the firft ftyle, and is alfo found in the fame place. The head pofteffes all the characters of dignified beauty, at the fame time exhibiting the rigidnefs of the an¬ cient ftyle. The face is defeClive in gracefulnefs •, yet it is evident how eafy it would have been to give the features more roundnefs and grace. The figures of Niobe and her daughters have not, in the opinion of Winkelman, that aufterity of appearance which marks the age of the ftatue of Pallas. They are charaCterifed by grandeur and fimplicity : fo Ample are the forms, that they do not appear to be the tedious productions of art, but to have been created by an inftantaneous effort of nature. Vol. XIX. Part I. TURK. 57 The third ftyle was the graceful or beautiful. Ly- 34 fippus W'as perhaps the artift who introduced this ftyle. Being more converfant than his predeceffors with the fweet, the pure, the flowing, and the beautiful lines of nature, he avoided the fquare forms which the mafters of the fecond ftyle had too much employed. He was of opinion that the ufe of the art was rather to pleafe than to aftonilh, and that the aim of the artift ftiould be to raife admiration by giving delight. I he artifts who cultivated this ftyle did not, however, negleCt to ftudy the fublime works of their predeceffors. They knew that grace is confiftent with the moll dignified beauty, and that it poffeffes charms which muft ever pleafe : they knewy alfo that thefe charms are enhanced by dig¬ nity. Grace is infufed into all the movements and atti¬ tudes of their ftatues, and it appears in the delicate turns of the hair, and even in the adjufting of the drapery. Every fort of grace was wTell known to the ancients j and great as the ravages of time have been amongft the works of art, fpecimens are ftill preferved, in which can be diftihguiftred dignified beauty, attraEiive beauty, and a beauty peculiar to infants. A fpecimen of dignified beauty may be feen in the ftatue of one of the mufes in the palace of Barberini at Rome •, and in the garden of the pope, on the Ouirinal, is a ftatue of another mufe, which affords a fine inftance of attraClive beauty. Win¬ kelman fays that the moft excellent model of infant beauty which antiquity has tranfinitted to us is a fatyr of a year old, which is preferved, though a little muti¬ lated, in Villa Albani. _ 35 _ The great reputation of Praxiteles and Apelles raifed The imita- an ardent emulation in their fucceffors, who defpairingtive to furpafs fuch illuftrious mafters, were fatisfied wdth imitating their works. But it is well known that a mere imitator is always inferior to the mafter whom he at¬ tempts to copy. When no original genius appears, the art mull therefore decline. Clay was the firft material which was employed in Materials ftatuary. An inftance of this may be feen in a figure Grecian of Alcamenes in bas-relief in Villa Albani. The an- atuC5- cients ufed their fingers, and efpeeially their nails, to render certain parts more delicate and lively : hence 37 arofe the phrafe ad unguem faElus homo, “ an accom- Gay and plilhed man.” It was the opinion of Count Caylus thatPlafter* the ancients did not ufe models in forming their ftatues. But to difprove this, it is only neceffary to mention an engraving on a ftone in the cabinet of btofch, which re- prefents Prometheus engraving the figure of a man, with a plummet in his hand to meafure the proportions of his model. The ancients as well as the moderns made works in plafter •, but no fpecimens remain except fome figures in bas-relief, of which the moft beautiful were found at Baia. 3S The Avorks made of ivory and filver Avere generally Ivory, fiE of a fmall fize. Sometimes, hoAvever, ftatues of a pro-vej‘’and digious fize AArere formed of gold and ivory. The co-® loffal Minerva of Phidias, Avhich Avas compofed of thefe materials, was 26 cubits high. It is indeed fcarcely II poflible (b) This is a proof additional to thofe that Avill be found in the articles to Avhich Ave have referred, that the Greeks received the rudiments of the art of fculpture from the nations to which they Avere confeffedly indebted for the elements of fcience. 39 Marble. 40 fiorphyry. 41 Ixpreffion gnd atti¬ tude. 42 In the ft a-, tues of the. gods. In the fta- tues of heroes. SCULPTURE. poiTible to believe that ftatues of fuch a lize could en¬ tirely confift of gold and ivory. The quantity of ivory neceflary to a colofial ftatue is beyond conception. M. de Paw calculates that the llatue of Jupiter Olympus, •which was 54 feet high, would confume the teeth of 300 elephants. The Greeks generally hewed their marble ftatues out of one block, though they after worked the heads fepa- rately, and fometimes the arms. The heads of the famous groupe of Niobe and her daughters have been adapted to their bodies after being feparately finifhed. It is proved by a large figure reprefenting a river, which is preferved in Villa Albani, that the ancients firft hewed their ftatues roughly before they attempted to finilh any part. When the ftatue had received its per- fe£t figure, they next proceeded to polifli it with pumice- ftone, and again carefully retouched every part with the chifel. The ancients, when they employed porphyry, ufually made the head and extremities of marble. It is true, that at Venice there are four figures entirely compofed of porphyry j but thefe are the produftion of the Greeks of the middle age. They alfo made ftatues of bafaltes and alabafter. Without expreflion, gtfture, and attitude, no figure can be beautiful, becaufe in thefe the graces always re- ftde. It was for this reafon that the graces are always reprefented as the companions of Venus. The expreflion of tranquillity was frequent in Grecian ftatues, becaufe, according to Plato, that was confider- ed as the middle ftate of the foul between pleafure and pain. Experience, too, fhows that in general the moft beautiful perfons are endowed with the fweeteft and moft engaging manner. Without a fedate tranquillity digni¬ fied beauty could not exift. It is in this tranquillity, therefore, that we muft look for the complete difplay of genius. The moft elevated fpecies of tranquillity and repofe was ftudied in the figures of the gods. The father of the gods, and even inferior divinities, are reprefented with¬ out emotion or refentment. It is thus that Homer paints Jupiter ftiaking Olympus by the motion of his hair and his eyebrows. Shakes his ambrofial curls, and gives the nod. The ftamp of fate and fanftion of the god. Jupiter-is not always exhibited in this tranquil ftate. In a bas-relief belonging to the marquis Rondini he ap¬ pears feated on an arm-chair with a melancholy afpedh The Apollo of the Vatican reprefents the god in a fit of rage againft the ferpent Python, which he kills at a blow-. The artift, adopting the opinion of the poets, has made the nofe the feat of anger, and the lips the feat of difdain. To exprefs the adlion of a hero, the Grecian feulptors delineated the countenance of a noble virtuous cliaracltr reprefting his groans, and allowing no expreflkm of pain to appear. In deferibing. the a61 ions of a hero the poet has much more liberty than the artift. The poet can paint them fuch as they were before men were taught to fubdue their paflions by the reftraints of law, ©r the refined cuftoms of focial life. But the artift, obliged to feledl the moft beautiful forms, is reduced to the i.eceflity of giving fuch an expreflion of the paflions as may not (hock our feelings and difguft us with his produdlion. The truth of thefe remarks will be ac¬ knowledged by thofe who have feen two of the moft . beautiful monuments of antiquity j one of which repre ¬ fents the fear of death, the other the moft violent pains and fufferings. The daughters of Niobe, againft whom Diana has difeharged her fatal arrows, are exhibited in that ftate of ftupefadtion which wre imagine muft take place when the certain profpedl of death deprives the foul of all fenfibility. The fable prefents us an image of that ftupor which Efchylus deferibes as feizing the daughters of Niobe when they were transformed into a rock. The other monument referred to is the image of Laocoon, which exhibits the moft agonizing pain that can affe6t the mufcles, the nerves, and the veins. The fufferings of the body and the elevation of the foul are exprefled in every member with equal energy, and form the moft; fublime contrail imaginable. Laocoon appears to fuflfer with fuch fortitude, that, whilft his lamentable fituation pierces the heart, the whole figure fills us with an ambitious defire of imitating hisconftancy and mag¬ nanimity in the pains and fufferings that may fall to our lot. Philo61etes is introduced by the poets fhedding tears, uttering complaints, and rending the air wdth his groans and cries j but the artift exhibits him filent and bear¬ ing his pains with dignity. The Ajax of the celebra¬ ted painter Timomachus is not drawn in the a6t of de- ftroying the flieep which he took for the Grecian chiefs, but in the moments of refle6lion which fucceeded that frenzy. So far did the Greeks carry their love of calmnefs and How movements, that they thought a quick ftep always announced rufticity of manners. De- mofthenes reproaches Nicobulus for this very thing j and from the words he makes ufe of, it appears, that to fpeak with infolence and to walk haftily were reckoned fynonymous. In the figures of women, the artifis have conformed in the^fU- to the principle obferved in all the ancient tragedies, and tues of recommended by Ariftotle, never to make women ihow wcinen* too much intrepidity or exceflive cruelty. Conforma¬ ble to this maxim, Clytemneftra is reprtfented at a little diftance from the fatal fpot, watching the murderer, but without taking any part with him. In a painting of Timomacbus reprefenting Medea and her children, when Medea lifts up the dagger they fmile in her face, and her fury is immediately melted into compaflion for the innocent victims. In another reprefentation of the- fame fubjedl, Medea appears hefitating and indecifive. Guided by the fame maxims, the artifts of moft refined tafte were careful to avoid all deformity, ehoofing rather to recede from truth than from their accuftomed refpedf for beauty, as may be feen in feveral figures of Hec uba. Sometimes, however, ftie appears in the decrepitude of age, her face furrowed with wrinkles, and her breads hanging down. llluftrious men,, and thofe invefted with the offices of in thefta- dignity, are reprefented with a noble affurance and firm tues of the afpedl. The ftatues of the Roman emperors referable Ronian cm“ thole of heroes, and are far removed from every fpeciesPerors‘ of flattery, in the gefture, in the attitude, and adlion. They never appear with haughty looks, or with the fplendour of royalty ; no figure is ever feen prefenting any thing to them with bended knee, except captives j and none addreffes them, with an inclination of the head. In* 59 46 Of propor¬ tion. SCULPTURE. fit modern works too little attention has been paid, to the ancient cojlume. Winkelman mentions a bas-relief, which was lately executed at Horae for the fountain, of Trevi, reprefenting an architeft in the aft of prefenting the plan of an aqueduft to Marcus Agrippa. The mo¬ dern fculptor, not content with giving a long beard to that illuftrious Roman, contrary to all the ancient mar¬ ble llatues as well as medals which remain, exhibits the architeft on his knees. In general, it was an eftabliihed principle to banifh all violent paffions from public monuments. This will ferve as a decilive mark to ditlinguilh the true antique from fuppofititious works. A medal has been found exhibiting two Affyrians, a man and woman, tearing their hair, with this infcription, Assyria, et. pa- EAESTINA. IK. POTEST. P. R. REDAC. S* c. The for¬ gery of this medal is manifeft from the word Pa/aeJH- na, which is not to be found in any ancient Roman me¬ dal with a Latin infcription. Befides, the violent ac¬ tion of tearing the hair does not fuit any fymbolical figure. This extravagant ftyle, which was called by the ancients parenthijrfis, has been imitated by moft of the modern artifts. Their figures referable comedians on the ancient theatres, who, in order to fuit the dillant fpcc- tators, put on painted malks, employed exaggerated geftures, and far overleaped the bounds of nature. This ftyle has been reduced into a theory in a treatife on the pafiions compofed by Le Brun. The defigns which ac¬ company that work exhibit the padions in the very higheft degree, approaching even to frenzy : but thefe are calculated to vitiate the tafte, efpecially of the young *, for the ardour of youth prompts them rather to feize the extremity than the middle •, and it will be dif¬ ficult for that artift rvho has formed his tafte from fuch empadioned models ever to acquire that noble fimplicity and fedate grandeur which diftinguifhed the Works of ancient tafte. Proportion is the balls of beauty, and there can be no beauty without it ^ on the contrary, proportion may exift where there is little beauty. Experience every day teaches us that knowledge is diftinft from tafte ; and proportion, therefore, which is founded on knowledge, may be ftriftly obferved in any figure, and vet the figure have no pretentions to beauty. The an¬ cients confidering ideal beauty as the moft perfeft, have frequently employed it in preference to the beauty ■of nature. The body confifts of three parts as well as the mem¬ bers. The three parts of the body are the trunk, the thighs, and the legs. The inferior parts of the body are the thighs, the legs, and the feet. The arms alfo confift of three parts. Thefe three parts mult bear a certain proportion to the whole as well as to one an¬ other. In a well formed man the head and body muft he proportioned to the. thighs, the legs, and the feet, in the fame manner as the thighs are proportioned to the legs and the feet, or the arms to the hands. The face alfo confifts of three parts, that is, three times the length of the nofe *, but the head is not four times the length of the nofe, as feme writers have afierted. From the place where the hair begins to the crown of the head are only three-fourths of the length of the nofe, or that part is to the nofe as 9 to I 2. It is probable that the Grecian, as well as Egyptian artifts, have determined the great and fmalt proportions by fixed rules j that they have eftablilhed a pofitive meafure for the dimenfions of length, breadth, and cir¬ cumference. This fuppofition alone can enable us to account for the great conformity which we meet with in ancient ftatues. Winkelman thinks that the foot was the meafure which the ancients ufed in all their great dimenfions, and that it was by the length of it that they regulated the meafure of their figures, by giving to them fix times that length. This in faft is the length which Vitruvius affigns, Pes verq altitudinis cor¬ poris fextec, lib. iii. cap. 1. That celebrated antiquary thinks the foot is a more determinate meafure than the head or the face, the parts from which modern painters and fculptors too often take their proportions. This pro¬ portion of the- foot of the body, which has appeared ftrange and incomprehenfible to the learned Huetius, and has been entirely rejefted by Perrault, is how'ever found¬ ed upon experience. After meafuring with great care a vaft number of figures, Winkelman found this pro¬ portion obferved not only in Egyptian ftatues, but alfo in thofe of Greece. This faft may be determined by an infpeftion of thofe ftatues the feet of which are per¬ feft. One may be fully convinced of it by examining fome divine figures, in which the artifts have made fome parts beyond their natural dimenfions. In the Apollo Belvidere, which is a little more than feven heads high, the foot is three Homan inches longer than the head. The head of the Venus de Medicis is very fmall, and the height of the ftatue is feven heads and a half: the foot Is three inches and a half longer than the head, or precifely the fixth part of the length of the whole ftatue. Practice of Sculpture. 47 We have been thus minute in our account of the Grecian Grecian fculnture, becaufe it is the opinion of the ableft lcuh:)tlfre . . , 1 , • n 1 1 A , r . to be ftu- cntics that modern artnts have been more or leis emi-bv the nent as they have ftudied w’itli the greater or lefs atten*modern ar- tion the models left us by that ingenious people : tifts. Winkelman goes fo far as to contend that the moft fi~ nifhed works of the Grecian mailers ought to be ftudied in preference even to the works of nature. This ap¬ pears to be paradoxical ; but the reafon affigned by the Abbe for his opinion is, that the faireft lines of beauty are more eafily difeovered, and make a more ftrikin'g and powerful impreflion, by their reunion in thefe fub- lime copies, than when they are fcattered far and wide in the original. Allowing, therefore, the ftudy of na¬ ture the high degree of merit it fo juflly claims, it muft neverthelefs be granted, that it leads to true beauty by a much more tedious, laborious, and difficult path, than the ftudy of the tuiticjue, which prefents immediately to the artift’s view the objeft of his refearches, and com¬ bines in a clear and ftfong point of light the various rays of beauty that are difperfed through the wide do¬ main of nature. As foon as the artift has laid this excellent founda¬ tion, acquired an intimate degree of familiarity with the beauties of the Grecian ftatues, and formed his tafte af¬ ter the admirable models they exhibit, he may then pro¬ ceed with advantage and affurance to the imitation of nature. The ideas he has already formed of the perfec¬ tion of nature, by obferving her dilperfed beauties com¬ bined and collefted in the compofitions of the ancient H 2 artifts. 6o 48 Two ways of imita¬ ting na¬ ture. 49 Models of ftatues. SCULPT U R E. artifts, will enable him to acquire with facility, and to employ with advantage, the detached and partial ideas of beauty which will be exhibited to his view in a fur- vey of nature in her aftual date. When he difcovers thefe partial beauties, he will be capable of combining them with tlxofe perfedt forms of beauty with which he is already acquainted. In a word, by having always prefent to his mind the noble models already mentioned, he xvill be in fome meafure his own oracle, and will draw rules from his owm mind. There are, however, two ways of imitating nature. In the one a lingle objedl occupies the artift, who en¬ deavours to reprefent it with preciiion and truth •, in the other, certain lines and features are taken from a variety of obiedls, and combined and blended into one regular whole. All kinds of copies belong to the firlt kind of imitation ; and produ&ions of this kind muft be executed neceffarily in the Dutch manner, that is to fay, with high finilhing, and little or no invention. But the fecond kind of imitation leads diredlly to the invefti- gation and difcovery of true beauty, of that beauty whofe idea is connate with the human mind, and is only to be found there in its higheft perfedlion. This is the kind of imitation in which the Greeks excelled, and in which men of genius excite the young artitfs to ex¬ cel after their example, viz. by Undying nature as they did. After having ftudied in the produdlions of the Gre¬ cian mafters their choice and expreflion of feledt na¬ ture, their fublime and graceful contours, their noble draperies, together with that fedate grandeur and ad¬ mirable fimplicity that conftitute their chief merit, the curious artifts will do rvell to ftudy the manual and me¬ chanical part of their operations, as this is abfolutely neceffary to the fuccefsful imitation of their excellent manner. It is certain that the ancients almoft always formed their firft models in wax: to this modern artifls have fubftituted clay, or fome fuch compofition : they prefer clay before wax in the carnations, on account of the yielding nature of the latter, and its flicking in fome meafure to every thing it touches. We mull not, how¬ ever, imagine from hence that the method of forming models of wet clay was either unknown or negle&ed among the Greeks : on the contrary, it was in Greece that models of this kind xvere invented. Their author was Dibutades of Sicyon ; and it is well known that Arcefilas, the friend of Lucullus, obtained a higher de¬ gree of reputation by his clay models than by all his other produdlions. Indeed, if clay could be made to preferve its original moidure, it would undoubtedly be the fitted: fubfiance for the models of the fculptor; but when it is placed either in the fire or left to dry im¬ perceptibly in the air, its folid parts grow more com- padl, and the figure lofing thus a part of its dimenfions, is neceffarily reduced to a fmaller volume. This dimi¬ nution would be of no confequence did it equally affecl the whole figure, fo as to preferve its proportions en¬ tire. But this is not the cafe : for the fmaller parts of the figure dry fooner than the larger ; and thus lofing more of their dimenfions in the fame fpace of time than the latter do, the fymmetry and proportions of the figure inevitably fuffer. This inconveniency does not take place in thofe models that are made in wax. It is in¬ deed extremely difficult, in the ordinary method of working the wax, to give it that degree of fmoothnefs that is neceffary to reprefent the foftnefs of the carnations or fleihy parts of the body. This inconvenience may, however, be remedied, by forming the model firft in clay, then moulding it in plafter, and laftly calling it in wax. And, indeed, clay is feldom ufed but as a mould in which to call a figure of plafter, ftucco, or wax, to ferve henceforth for a model by which the meafures and proportions of the ftatue are to be ad- jufted. In making waxen models, it is common to put half a pound of colophony to a pound of wax j, and fome add turpentine, melting the whole with oil of olives. So much for the. firft or preparatory fteps in this Method of procedure. It remains to confider the manner of work-working ing the marble after the model fo prepared j and thethe mar- method here followed by the Greeks feems to haveble’an, Fig. a, which connects them. Experience has {hewn, however, that the gatherer is in general preferable to thefe hoops, as it does not leave an ear of corn behind. SCYTHIA, an ancient name for the northern parts of Afia, now known by the name of Tarta>~y ; alfo for fome of the north-eaftern parts of Europe. This vail territory, which extends itfelf from the Ifter or Danube, the boundary of the Celts, that is, from about the 25th to almoft the noth degree of call lon¬ gitude, was divided into Scythia in Europe and Scythia in Afia, including, however, the two Sarmatias} or, as they are called by the Greeks, Sauromotias, now the Circaftian Tartary, which lay between and fevered the two Scythias from each other. Sauromatia was alfo di- ftinguiihed into European and Afiatic} and was divided from the European Scythia by the river Don or Tanais, which falls into the Palus Meotisj and from the Afiatic by the Rha, now Volga, which empties itfelf into the Cafpian fea. 1. The Afiatic Scythia comprehended in general, Great Tartary, and Ruffia in Afia } and, in particular, the Scythia beyond or without Imaus, contained the re¬ gions ot Bogdoi or Oftiacoi, and Tanguti. That within, or on this fide Imaus, had Turkeftan and Mongal, the Ufbeck or Zagatai, Kalmue and Nagaian Tartars } be- fides Siberia, the land of the Samoiedes and Nova Zem- bla. Thefe three laft not being fo foon inhabited as the former, as may be reafonably fuppofed, were w holly un¬ known to the ancients } and the former were peopled by the Eaftrians, Sogdians, Gandari, Sacks, and Maffagetes. As for Sarrmitia, it contained Albania, Iberia, and Colchis } which makes now the Circaflian Tartary, and the province of Georgia. 2. Scythia in Europe reached (towards the fouth- weft) to the- Po and the Alps, by which it was divided from Celto-Gallia* It was bounded on the foutlx by the SEA [ 64 1 SEA Scythia the Iftef or Danube and the Euxine Tea. Its northern lieved the exiftence of a vaft fouthern continent, which Sea. It limits have been fuppofed to ftretch to the fpring-heads Captain Cook has ihovn to be vilionary. It was this v “■./ , of the Borifthenes or Nieper, and the Rha or Volga, and cireumftance which milled him. According to the fo to that of the Tanais.—The ancients divided this moft accurate obfervations hitherto made, the lurface of country into Scythia Arimafpsea, which lay eaitward, the fea is to the land as three to one 5 the ocean therefore joining to Scythia in Afia 5 and Sarmatia Europeana extends over 128,2355759 m^es> fuppoling the on the weft. In Scythia, properly fo called, wrere the fuperficies of the whole globe to be Iquare Arimafpsei on the north } the Getee or Dacians along miles. I o afcertain the depth ol the lea is ftill more ^ ^ ^ the Danube, on the fouth j and the Neuri between difficult than its fuperficies, both on account of the thepfea° thefe two. So that it contained the European Ruffia numerous experiments which it would be neceffary to or Mufcovy, and the Leffer Crim Tartary eaftward 5 make, and the want of proper inftruments for that pur- and, on the weft, Lithuania, Poland, part of Hungary, pofe. Beyond a certain depth the fea has hitherto Tranfylvania, Walachia, Bulgaria, and Moldavia. Sar- been found unfathomable •, and though feveral methods matia is fuppofed to have reached northward to that have been contrived to obviate this difficulty, none of part of Swedeland called Feningia, now Finland; in them has completely anfwered the purpofe. Vve know which they placed the Ocenes, Panoti, and Hippopodes. in general that the, depth of. the fea increafes gradually This part they divided from Northern Germany, now as we leave the {here } but it this continued beyond a the w'eft part of Sweden and Norway, by the Mare certain diftance, the depth in the middle ot the ocean Sarmaticum or Scythicutn, which they fuppofed ran up would be prodigious. Indeed the numerous ihands into the northern ocean, and, dividing Lapland into two everywhere fcaticred in the tea demonftrate the con- parts, formed the weftern part of Swreden, with Norway, trary, by Ihowing m that the bottom of the water L into one ifland, and Finland into another 5 fuppofing this unequal like the land, and that fo lar from uniformly alfo to be cut off from the continent by the gulf of finking, it fometimes riles into lofty mountains. If the that name. depth of the fea be in proportion to the elevation of Although tbe ancieint Scythians were celebrated as the land, as has generally been fuppofed, its greateft a warlike people, yet their hiftory is too uncertain and depth will not exceed five or fix miles, for there is no obfcure to enable us to give any detail which would not mountain fix miles perpendiculai above the level of the prove equally tirefome and uninterefting to the reader, fea. I he fea has never been actually founded to a MrPinkerton, in a differtation on their origin', endeavours greater depth than a mile and 66 feet j every thing be- to prove that they were the moft ancient of nations } yond that therefore refts entiiely upon conjecture, and and he affigns for the place of their firft habitation the analogical reaioning, which ought never to be admitted country known by the name of Perfia. From Perfia, to determine a fingle point that can be afcertained by lie thinks, they proceeded in numerous hordes weft ward, experiment, becaule, when admitted, they have too often furrounded the Euxine, peopled Germany, Italy, Gaul, led to falfe conelufions. Along the coafts, vhere the the countries bordering on the Baltic, Avith part of depth of the fea is in general uell known, it has always Britain and Ireland. That the Scythiatis Avere of Afia- been found proportioned to^ the height of the ftiore : tic origin, cannot, we think, be queftionedj and as Perfia Avhen the coaft is high ana mountainous, the fea that Avas peopled at a Arery early period, it may not impro- wadies it is deep } Avhen, on the contrary, the coaft is bably have been their parent country : but Avlien our Ioav, the Avater is dialloAv. V hether this analogy holds author contends that their empire had fubfifted for more at a diftance from the ffiore, experiments alone can de- than 1500 years before Ninus the founder of the Ally- termine. . . 3 rian monarchy, and that it extended from Egypt to the Fo calculate the quantity of Avater contained in the Quantity Ganges, and from the Perfian gulf and Indian fea to lea, Avhile its depth is unknown, is impoffible. But if ot water the Cafpian, Ave cannot help thinking that his prejudices avc fuppofe Avith Buffon that its medium depth is the againft the Celts, and his defire to do honour to his fa- fourth part of a mile, the ocean, it its luperficies be vourite Goths, have made him advance a paradox incon- 120,235,759 filuare miles, Avill contain 32?°5^5939’75 fiftent Avith the moft authentic records of antiquity. His cubic miles Aif Avater. differtation hoAvever is ingenious, and replete Avith a \7a- Let us mnv endeavour to compute .the quantity of rietv of curious learning. xvater Avhich is conftantly difcharged into the fta. For ScTTHIAN Lamb, in Natural Flijlory. See Scythian this purpofe let us take a river whofe velocity and quan- Lamb. tity of Avater is known, the Po, for inftance, Avhich ac- SCYTHROPS, or Channel-bill, a genus of birds cording to Riccioli is 1000 feet (or ico perches of^^0^ belonging to the order of Picse. See Ornithology, Bologna) broad, 10 feet deep, and runs at the rate of art> IOi N° 149.° fyur miles ln an hour; confequently that river dif- SEA, in a ftrifl fenfe, fignifies a large portion of charges into the fea 200,000 cubic perches of AA^ater in Avater almoft furrounded by land, as the Baltic and an hour, or 4,800,000 in a day. A cubic mile con- Mediterranean feas ; but it is frequently ufed for that tains 125,000,000 cubic perches ; the Po therefore T vaft body of Avater Avhich encompaffes the whole earth. will take 26 days to difeharge a cubic mile of Avater What pro- What proportion the fuperficies of the fea bears to into the fea. Let us noAV fuppofe, Avhat is perhaps not ■portion the 0f t}je lanJ cannot eafily be afcertained. Buflbn has very far from the truth, that the quantity of Avater furface of f^ppofed that the furface of our globe is equally divided Avhich the fea receives from the rivers in any country is bear.f to between land and Avater, and has accordingly calculated proportioned to the extent of that country. The Po that of the the fuperficies of tlie fea to be 85,490,506 fquare miles, from its origin to its .mouth traverfes a country 380 land. ]3ut ft is now Avell known that the ocean covers much miles long, and the rivers Avhich fall into it on every more than the half of the earth’s furface. Buffon be- fide rife from fources about fixty miles diftant from it. The Sea. 4 Why it does not increafe. SEA- [ The Po, therefore, and the rivers which it receives, wa¬ ter a country of 45,600 fquare miles. Now fmce the whole fuperficies of the dry land is about 42,745,253 fquare miles, it follows, from our fuppofition, that the quantity of water difcharged by all the rivers in the world, in one day, is 3^ cubic miles, and in a year 13,140. If therefore the fea contains 32,058,939 cubic niiles of water, it would take all the rivers in the world 2439 years to difcharge an equal quantity. It may feem furpriiing that the fea, lince it is con¬ tinually receiving fuch an immenfe fupply of water, does not vifibly increafe, and at laft cover the whole earth. But our furprife will ceafe, if we confider that the ri¬ vers themfelves are fupplied from the fea, and that they do nothing more than carry back thofe waters which the ocean is continually lavifliing on the earth. Dr Halley has demonftrated that the vapours raifed from the fea and tranfported on land are fufficient to main¬ tain all the rivers in the world. The fimplicity of this great procefs is aftonilhing : the fea not only connefts diftant countries, and renders it eafy to tranfport the commodities of one nation to another, but its waters tiling in the air defcend in (bowers to fertilize the earth and nourilh the vegetable kingdom, and collecting into rivers flow onwards, bringing fertility and wealth and commerce along with them, and again return to the fea to repeat the fame round. The knowledge of this procefs of nature might, one would think, have convinced philofophers that the pro¬ portion between fea and land continued always nearly the fame. Philofophers.however have formed different theories about this as well as moft other fubje&s,. main¬ taining on the one hand that the fea is continually encroaching on the land, and on the other that the land is conftantly gaining on the fea. Both fides have fup- ported their theories by arguments, demonftrations, and incontrovertible faCls! The height of the mountains, fay the philofophers »» who fupport the encroachments of the fea, is continual- who affirm jy diminifhing •, expofed to the violence of every ftorm, that the fea the harde{l rocks mull at laft give way and tumble ingonThe down. The rivers are continually fweeping along with Sea. 5. Theories philofo phers on this fub- jeft. Ar guments of thofe land. them particles of earth which they depolite in the bot¬ tom of the fea. Both the depth of the ocean then and the height of the dry land mult be always decreafing j the waters therefore muft, unlefs a part of them were annihilated, fpread over a greater extent of furface in proportion as thefe caufes operate. 1 his reafoning, convincing as it is, might be confirmed by a great number of faCts: it will be fufficient however to.men- tion one or two. In the reign of Auguftus the ifle of Wight made a part of Britain, fo that the Englilh crolfed over to it at low water with cart loads of tin > yet that illand is at prefent feparated from Britain by a channel half a mile wide. The Godwin fands on the eaftern Ihore of England were formerly the fertile eftate •f Earl Godwin. Nor are the encroachments of the fea confined to Britain, In the bay of Baiae near Na¬ ples there are remains of houfes and ftreets ftill vilible below the prelent level of the fea. The fea, therefore, is making continued encroachments upon the land ; and the time will come, fay they, when the waters will again cover the furface of the earth. Such are the arguments of thofe philofophers W'hb maintain the continual encroachments of the fea, Thofe VOL. XIX. Part I, 65 ] SEA who maintain the oppofite theory, that the land is gra¬ dually gaining on the fea, though they pretend not to deny the fads advanced by their opponents, affirm that Argu,nents they are altogether infufficient to eflablilh the hypo-0f tliofe thelis which they were brought forward to fupport. who affirm Though the rivers carry down particles of earth into|^^e the fea, thefe, fay they, are either accumulated on other ^a"in;ng oft ffiores, or, collefling in the bottom ot the ocean, harden the fea. into ftone, which being polfeffed of a vegetative power rifes by degrees above the furface of the fea, and forms rocks, and mountains, and illands. The vegetative na-. ture of ftone indeed is fufficient, of itfelf, to convince us that the quantity of earth muft be daily accumula- ting, and confequently that the furface of the fea is di- miniffiing in extent. Celfius, a Swedilh philnfopher (for this difpute has been carried on in Sweden with the greateft keennefs), has endeavoured to build this theory with more folid materials than vegetable ftone. In a curious memoir, publilhed in 1743* he afferts that the Baltic and the Atlantic, at leaft that part of it which waffies Norway, is conftantly diminilhing } and he proves this by the teftimony of a great many aged pilots and fiffiermen, who affirmed that the fea was become much lhallower in many places than it had been during their youth : that many rocks formerly covered with water were now feveral feet above the furface of the fea : that loaded velTels ufed formerly to ride in many places where pinnaces and barks could now with difficulty fwim. He produces inftanees of ancient fea-port towns now feveral leagues from the Ihore, and of anchors and wrecks of veffels found far within the country. He mentions a particular rock which 168 years before was at the bottom of the fea, but was then raifed eight feet above its furface. In another place where the water 50 years before had reached to the knee there was then none. Several rocks, too, which during the infancy of fome old pilots had been two feet under water, were then three feet above it. From all thefe obfer vat ions M. Celfius concludes, that the water of the Baltic de- creafes in height 4^ lines in a year, 4 inches 5 lines in 18 years, 4 feet 5 inches in a hundred years, and in a thoufand years 45 feet. Confcious, however, that thefe fads, how conclufive foever as far as relates to the Bal¬ tic, can never determine the general queftion, M. Celfius advances another argument in fupport of his theory. All that quantity of moifture, fays he, which is imbibed by plants is loft to the general mafs of water, being con¬ verted into earth by the putrefa&ion of vegetables. This notion had been mentioned by Newton, and was adopted by Van Helmont: if granted, it follows as a confequence that the earth is continually increaling and the water diminilhing in a very rapid degree. s Such are the arguments advanced in fupport of both Thefe a*, theories 5 for it is needlefs to mention a notion of Lin- neeus that the whole earth was formerly covered witht water except a (ingle mountain. When fairly weighed, they amount to nothing more than this, that the fea has encroached upon the land in fome places, and reti¬ red in others *, a conclufion which we are very willing to allow. What was advanced by thofe philofophers who maintain that the fea is continually encroaching on the land, about the depth of the fea conftantly di- minilhing, muft remain a mere affertion, till they prove by experiments, either that this is really the cafe, or that nature has no way of reftoring thofe particles of I earth Sea. 9 .Bottom of the fea. SEA [66 earth which are wafhed down by the rivers. Nor have they any good reafon to affirm that the height of the mountains is decrealing. Can a Angle uncontrovertible inftance be produced of this ? Are the Alps or the Apen¬ nines, or Taurus, or Caucafus, lefs lofty now than they were a thoufand years ago ? We mean not to deny that the rain actually waffies down particles of earth from the mountains, nor to affirm that the hardeft rocks are able to refill continual llorms, nor that many mountains yhave fuffered, and continue to fuffer daily, from a thou¬ fand accidents. But the effefts produced by all thefe caufes are lb trifling as to be altogether impercepti¬ ble (a). Nature has affiduoufly guarded againlt fuch accidents 5 fhe has formed the mountains of the moft durable materials; and where they are covered with earth, the has bound it together by a thick and firm matting of grafs, and thus fecured it from the rains 5 and Humid accident deprive it of this covering, Ihe takes care immediately to fupply the defeft. Even fliould the earth be fwept away together with its covering, na¬ ture has Hill fuch refources left as frequently reftore things to their former ftate. Many kinds of mofs, one would be tempted to think, have been created for this very purpofe : they take root and flouriffi almofl: upon the bare rock, and furnifh as they decay a fufficient bed for feveral of the hardy Alpine plants. Thefe ptriffi in their turn, and others fucceed them. The roots of the plants bind fall the earth as it accumulates, more plants fpring up and fpread wider, till by degrees the whole furface is covered wfith a firm coat of grafs. As the fea covers fo great a portion of the globe, we fhould, no doubt, by exploring its bottom, difcover a vafl: number of interefiing particulars. Unfortunately in the greater part of the ocean this has hitherto been impoffible. Part, however, has been examined; and the difcoveries which this examination has produced may enable us to form fome idea at leafl: of the whole. The bottom of the fea, as might have been conje&ured in¬ deed beforehand, bears a great refemblance to the fur- face of the dry land, being, like it, full of plains, rocks, caverns and mountains ; fome of which are abrupt and almofl: perpendicular, while others rife with a gentle de¬ clivity, and fometimes tower above the water and form iflands. Neither do the materials differ which compofe the bottom of the fea and the bafis of the dry land. If we dig to a confiderable depth in any part of the earth, we uniformly meet with rock ; the fame thing holds in the fea. The ffrata, too, are of the fame kind, difpo- fed in the fame manner, and form indeed but one whole. The fame kind of mineral and bituminous fubftances are alfo found interfperfed with thefe ftrata ; and it is to them probably that the fea is indebted for its bitter tafte. Over thefe natural and original ftrata an artifi¬ cial bed has pretty generally been formed, compofed of different materials in different places. It confifts fre¬ quently of muddy tartareous fubftances firmly cemented 1 SEA together, fometimes of fliells or coral reduced to pow- Sea. der, and near the mouths of rivers it is generally com- pofed of fine fand or gravel. The bottom of the fea refembles the land likewife in another particular : many freffi fprings and even rivers rife out of it, which, dif- placing the fait water, render the lower part of the fea wherever they abound quite freffi. An inftance of this kind occurs near Goa on the weftern coaft of Indo- ftan #, and anotherf in the Mediterranean fea not far * Boy/e da from Marfeilles. Thefe fadts occafioned a notion, which Fu/ido Ma~ later experiments have exploded, that the fea beyond & r r certain depth wras always freffi. HiJUnre 1 Subftances of a very beautiful appearance are fre- Phxfique de quently brought up by the founding line from the bot- la Mar, tom of the fea. The plummet is hollowed below, and Partle I* this cavity filled with tallow, to which fome of the fub¬ ftances adhere which form the bed of the ocean. Thefe are generally fand, gravel, or mud ; but they are fome¬ times of the brighteft fcarlet, vermilion, purple, and yellow ; and fometimes, though lefs frequently, they are blue, green, or white. Thefe colours are owing to a kind of jelly which envelopes the fubftances, and va- niih entirely as foon as this jelly dries. At times, how¬ ever, they affume the appearance of tartareous crufts, and are then fo permanent, that they can be received into white wax melted and poured round them, and perhaps by proper care might be converted into valuable paints. 10 Sea-water is really, as any one may convince himfelf Colour of by pouring it into a glafs, as clear and tranfparent as^16^63, river w'ater. The various appearances therefore which it affumes are owing to accidental caufes, and not to any change in the water itfelf. The depth, or the materials which compofe the bottom of the fea, occafions it to affume different colours in different places. The Ara¬ bian gulf, for inftance, is faid to be red from the co¬ lour of the fands which form its bed. The appearance of the fea is affedted too by the winds and the fun, while the clouds that pafs over it communicate all their various and fleeting colours. When the fun ffiines it is green ; when the fun gleams through a fog it is yel¬ low ; near the north pole it appears black ; while in the torrid zone its colour is often brown. Sometimes the fca affumes a luminous appearance. See Light, Yol. XII. page 2. ir The fea contains the greateft quantity of fait in the Saltnefs of torrid zone, where otherwife from the exceflive heat the fea. it would be in danger of putrefaction: as we advance northward this quantity diminiffies, till at the pole it nearly vaniffies altogether. Under the line Lucas found that the fea contained a feventh part of folid contents, confifting chiefly of fea-falt. At Harwich he found it yielded -/j-th of fea-falt. At Carlfcroon in Sweden it contains yg-th part (b), and on the coaft of Greenland a great deal lefs. This deficiency of fait near the poles probably contributes a good deal towards the prodigi- (A) M. Genfanne pretends that the Pyrenean mountains become an inch lower every ten years. But even ac¬ cording to his own calculation, it would require a million of years to level thefe mountains with the plain, though they continued to decreafe at the fame rate; and philofophers tell us that this rate is conftantly dx- minilhing ! (b) This gradual diminution of faltnefs from the equator to the pole is not, however, without particular excep¬ tions. The Mediterranean fea contains -^th of fea-falt, which is left than the German fea contains. SEA [ 67 ] SEA Sea. ous quantities of ice which are met with in thefe feas; for fait water requires a much greater degree of cold to freeze it than frelli water. It was this circumftance, probably, together with its conflant motion, which in¬ duced the ancients to believe that the fea never froze. Even among the moderns it has been a generally re¬ ceived opinion, that fea-ice is originally formed in ri¬ vers. Buffon has made the great quantities of ice with which the South fea abounds an argument for the exiftence of a continent near the Antarflic pole. But it is now well known that great quantities of ice are formed at a diftance from land. Sea-ice is of two kinds; field ice, which extends along the (bore, and is only two or three feet thick ; and mountain ice, which abounds in the middle of the ocean. The fize of thefe moun¬ tains is fometimes prodigious. The fea-ice is always frelh, and has been often of great ufe to navigators. The weight of fea-water is to that of river-water as 73 to 70 ; that is, a cubic foot of fea-water weighs 731b. while the fame quantity of river-water weighsonly 7olb. •, but this proportion varies in different places. It is worthy of our attention, too, that the water at the fur- face of the fea contains lefs fait than near the bottom •, the difference indeed is inconfiderable, but ftill it is fomething. The Compte de Marfigli found the fame quantity of water, when taken from the bottom of the Mediterranean, to weigh one ounce three pennyweights 51 grains; whereas from the furface it weighed only one ounce three pennyweights 49 grains. He repeated the experiment frequently with nearly the fame refult. The fca, with refpeft to temperature, may be divided into two regions: The firft begins at the furface of the water, and defcends as far as the influence of the fun’s rays; the fecond reaches from thence to the bottom of the fea. In fummer the lower region is confiderably colder than the upper: but it is probable that during Submarbia- winter the very reverfe takes place; at lead the Compte rum. " de Marfigli found it fo repeatedly in the Mediterranean. This naturally refults from the fituation of the water near the bottom of the fea. Uninfluenced by the chan¬ ges in the atmofphere, it retains always nearly the fame degree of temperature : and this is confiderably above congelation ; for the lower region of the fea, at leaft in the temperate parts of the world, was never known to Phil. Tranf. freeze. Captain Ellis let down a fea-gage (fee Gage) tor 1S7I> in latitude 250 12' north, and longitude 250 13' weft, to take the degrees of temperature and faltnefs of the fea at different depths. It defcended 5346 feet, which is a mile and eleven fathoms. He found the fea falter and colder in proportion to its depth till the gage had defcended 3900 feet, when the mercury in the thermo¬ meter came up at 53 ; but the water never grew colder, though he let down the gage 2446 feet lower. At the furface the thermometer flood at 84. The fea has three kinds of motion: 1. The firft is that undulation which is occafioned by the wind. This motion is entirely confined to the furface; the bottom even during the moft violent ftorms remains perfeftly calm. Mr Boyle has remarked, from the teftimony of feveral divers, that the fea is affe&ed by the winds only to the depth of fix feet. It would follow from this, that the height of the waves above the furface does not exceed fix feet; and that this holds in the Mediter¬ ranean at leaft, we are informed by the Compte de Mar¬ figli, though he alfo fometimes obferved them, during Sea. 12 Tempera¬ ture of the fea. Boyle de Temperie p. 215. 13 The fea has three motions. Motion occafioned by the wind a very violent tempeft, rife two feet higher. It is af¬ firmed by Pliny, and feveral other ancient writers, that 7 "“r’ oil calms the waves of the fea ; and that divers were ac- p.;pe4\y cuftomed to carry feme of it for that purpofe in their 0;i. mouths. This account was always confidered by the moderns as a fable, and treated with fuch contempt, that they did not even deign to put it to the teft of expe¬ riment, till Dr Franklin accidentally difcovered its truth. Happening in 1757 to be in the middle of a large fleet, he obferved that the water round one or two veffels was quite calm and fmooth, while everywhere elfe it was very much agitated by the winds. He ap¬ plied to the captain for an explanation of this phenome¬ non, who replied, that the cooks, he fuppofed, had thrown their greafy water out at the fcupper-holes, and by that means oiled the fides of the veffels in queftion. This anfwer did not fatisfy the Do£tor at firft ; but re¬ collecting what Pliny had faid on the fubjeCt, he refol- ved at leaft to make the experiment. He did fo accord¬ ingly in 1762, and found that oil actually calmed the waves of the fea. He repeated the experiment upon a pond at Clapham: the oil fpread itfelf with great rapidity upon the furface, but did not produce the defired effect, becaufe, having been thrown in upon the fide oppofite to the wind, it was immediately driven to the edge ot the water. But upon throwing in a like quantity upon the other fide of the lake, it calmed in an inftant feve¬ ral yards of the furface ; and gradually fpreading, ren¬ dered all that part of the lake, to the extent of at leaft; half an acre, as fmooth as glafs. The curious effect pro¬ duced by this liquid may be accounted for by the repul- fion which exifts between oil and water, and between oil and air, which prevents all immediate contaft, all rub¬ bing of the one upon the other. T „ 2. The fecond kind of motion is that continual ten-M0tk,n to dency which the whole water in the fea has towards the wards the weft. It is greater near the equator than about theweft—Cur- poles ; and indeed cannot be faid to take place at all inreHts’ the northern hemifphere beyond the tropic. It begins on the weft fide of America, where it is moderate : hence that part of the ocean has been called Pacific. As the waters advance weftward their motion is accele¬ rated ; fo that, after having traverfed the globe, they ftrike with great violence on the eaftern Ihore of Ame¬ rica. Being flopped by that continent, they turn north- ward, and run with conftderable impetuofity in the gulf of Mexico; from thence they proceed along the coaft of North America, till they come to the fouth fide of the great bank at Newfoundland, when they turn off, and run down through the Weftern Ifles. This current is called the Gulf Stream. It was firft accurately defcribed by Dr Franklin, who remarked alfo, that the Avater in it having been originally heated in the torrid zone, cools fo gradually in its paffage northward, that even the latitude might be found in any part of the ftream by means of a thermometer.— This motion of the fea weftward has never been ex¬ plained : it feems to have fome conneftion Avith the trade-winds and the diurnal revolution of the earth on its axis. _ }* 3. The third and moft remarkable motion of the fea is the tide, which is a regular fwell of the ocean once every 12 hours, oAving, as Newton has demonftrated, to the attraftion of the moon. In the middle of the fea the tide feldom rifes higher than one or two feet, I 3 but SEA [ 68 ] SEA but on tbe coafl: it frequently readies the height of 45 feet, and in fome places even more. The tide ge¬ nerally rifes higher in the evening than in the morn¬ ing : on the coaft of Britain this holds in winter, but in fummer the morning tides are higheft. In fome leas it is faid that there are no tides. This cannot be owing to their being furrounded by land, becaufe there is a tide in the lakes of North America. For an ex¬ planation of thefe and other phenomena we refer to the article Tide. SEA- Air, that part of the atmofphere which is above the fea. Sea-air has been found falubrious and remarkably beneficial in fome diftempers. This may be owing to its containing a greater portion of oxigenous gas or vi¬ tal air, and being lefs impregnated with noxious vapours than the land. Dr Ingenhoufz made feveral experi¬ ments to afcertain the falubrity of fea-air. By mixing equal meafures of common air and nitrous air, he found, that at Gravefend, they occupied about 104, or one mea- fure and of a meafure: whereas on fea, about three miles from the mouth of the Thames, two meafures of air (one of common and one of nitrous air) occupied from 0.91 to 0.94. He attempted a fimilar experiment on the middle of the channel betiveen the Englifh coafl: and Oftend j but the motion of the fliip rendered it im¬ practicable. He found that in rainy and windy weather the fea-air contained a fmaller quantity of vital air than when the weather wTas calm. On the fea-ihore at Oftend it occupied from 944 to 97; at Bruges he found it at 105 *, and at Antwerp ic>94- Dr Ingenhoufz thus con¬ cludes his paper : It appears, from thefe experiments, that the air at fea and clofe to it is in general purer and fitter for ani¬ mal life than the air on the land, though it feems to be fubjeCI to the fame inconftancy in its degree of purity with that of the land j fo that we may now with more confidence fend our patients, labouring under confump- tive diforders, to the fea, or at leaft to places fituated clofe to the fea, which have no marflies in their neigh¬ bourhood. It feems alfo probable, that the air will be found in general much purer far from the land than near the fliore, the former being never fubjeCI to be mixed with land air. Dr Damman, an eminent phyfician and profeflbr royal of midwifery at Ghent, told Dr Ingenhoufz, that when he was formerly a praCHtioner at Oftend, during leven years, he found the people there remarkably heal¬ thy ; that nothing was rarer there than to fee a patient labouring under a confumption or afthma, a malignant, putrid, or fpotted fever j that the difeafe to which they are the moft fubjeft, is a regular intermittent fever in autumn, when hidden tranfitions from hot to cold wea¬ ther happen. People are in general very healthy at Gibraltar, though there are very few trees near that place 5 which Dr Ingenhoufz thinks is owing to the purity of the air arifing from the neighbourhood of the fea. Mpft fmall iflands are very healthy. At Malta people are little fubjefl to difeafes, and live to a very advanced age. SEA-Anemony. See A NIMAL ■ Flower. SEA Bear. \ g p 1 Sea-Calf, j ’ > Mammalia Index. SEA-Cow. See Trichecus, J SEA-Crow, Mire-Crow, or Pewit. See Larus, Or- ^ NITHOLOGY Index. SEA, Dead. See Asphaltites. SEA-Devil. See Lophius, ICHTHYOLOGY Index. SF.A-Dragon, a monfter of a very lingular nature. In the Gentleman’s Magazine for the year 1749, we have the account of a fea-dragon which was laid to be taken between Orford and Southwould, on the coaft of Suf¬ folk, and afterwards carried round the country as a cu- riofity by the filhermen who caught it. “ Its head and tail (fays the writer) refemble thofe of an alligator ; it has two large fins, which ferve it both to fvvim and to fly; and though they were fo dried that I could not extend them, yet they appear, by the folds, to be lhaped like thofe which painters have given to dragons and other winged monfters that ferve as fuppor- ters to coats of arms. Its body is covered with impene¬ trable feales; its legs have two joints, and its feet are hoofed like thofe of an afs: it has five rows of very white and Iharp teeth in each jaw, and is in length about four feet, though it was longer when alive, it having Ihrunk as it became dry. “ It was caught in a net with mackerel; and being dragged on fliore, was knocked down with a ftretclier or boat-hook. The net being opened,- it fuddenly fprung up, and flew above 50 yards '■ the man who firft feized it had feveral of his fingers bitten off; and the wound mortifying, he died. It afterwards fattened on the man’s arm who ftiows it, and lacerated it fo much, that the mufcles are ihrunk, and the hand and fingers diftorted \ the wound is not yet healed, and is thought to be incurable. It is faid by fome to have been deferibed by naturalifts under the name of the Sea- dragon.'1' We muft add to the account now given of the monfter called a fea-dragon, that we think it ex¬ tremely probable that the animal was nothing more than a diftorted or overgrown individual of fome of the well known fpecies of fifti. SEA-Gage. See Sea GAGE. SEA-Hare. See Lapjlysia, Helminthology In¬ dex. SEA-Horfe, in Ichthyology, the Englifh name of the Hippocampus. See Syngnathus, Ichthyology In¬ dex. SEA-Lemon. See Doris, Helminthology Index. SEA-Lion. See Phoca, Mammalia Index. SEA-Mall, or SEA-Mew. See Larus, ORNITHOLO¬ GY Index. SEA-Man. See Mermaid. SEA-Marks. The erettion of beacons, light-houfes,, and fea-marks, is a branch of the royal prerogative* By 8 Eliz. 13. the corporation of the Trinity-houfe are empowered to fet up any beacons or fea-marks wherever they (hall think them neceffary j and if tne owner of the land or any other perlon lhall deftroy them, or take down any fteeple, tree, or other known fea-mark, he fliall forfeit 100I. fterling j or, in cafe of inability to pay it, he ftiall be ipfo fadlo outlawed. SEA-Needle, Gar-ffh. See Esox, Ichthyology Index. SEA-Nettle. See AlNIMAL-Flower. SEA-Pie, or Oyjler-Catcher. See Ha:MATOPUS, OR¬ NITHOLOGY Index. SEA-Plants, are thofe vegetables that grow in falt- water within the ftiores of the fea.. The old botanifts divided SEA [ 69 ] SEA Sea. divided thefe into three claffes. I. The firft clafs, ae- —V cording to their arrangement, contained the a/g r, the fuci, tlie fea-mqjjes, or confervas, and.the different ipe- cies of fponges. 2. The iecond contained fubftances of a hard texture, like ftone or horn, which feem to have been of the fame nature with what we call %oophyta, with this difference, that we refer fponges to this clafs and not to the firft. The third clafs is the fame with our lithophyta, comprehending corals, madrepora, &tc. It is now Avell known that the genera belonging to the fecond and third of thefe claffes, and even fome refer¬ red to the. firft, are not vegetables, but animals, or the productions of animals. See CoRALLlNA, Madrepora, Spongia. Sea-plants, then, properly fpeaking, belong to the clafs of cryptogamia, and the order of algaj •, and, according to Bomare, are all comprehended under the genus of fucus. We may alfo add feveral ipecies of the ulva and conferva and the fargazo. The fuel and marine ulvae are immerfed in the fea, are fefiile, and without root. The marine confervae are either feilile or floating. The fargazo grows beyond foundings. As fome fpecies of the fucus, when dried and pre- ferved, are extremely beautiful, the curious, and efpeci- ally thofe who profecute the ftudy of botany, muft be anxious to know the beft method of preferving them, without deftroying their colour and beauty. The fol¬ lowing method is recommended by M. Mauduyt. I ake a fheet of paper, or rather of pafteboard, and cover it with varnilh on both fides; and having rowed in a boat to the rock where the fucus abounds, plunge your var- niftied paper into the water, and, detaching the fucus, receive it upon the paper. Agitate the paper gently in the water, that the plants may be properly fpread over it; and lift them up together foftly out of the water : then fix down with pins the ftrong ftalks, that they may not be difplaced, and leave the plant lying upon the varniftied paper to dry in the open air. When it is fully dry, the different parts will retain their pofition, and the plant may be preferved within the leaves of a book. To free it from the flime and fait which adhere to it, wafh it gently in freftv water, after being removed from the rock on which it grew. SEA-Serpcnt, a monftrous creature, faidto inhabit the northern feas about Greenland and the coafts of Nor¬ way. The following marvellous account of this monfter is given by Guthrie. 44 In 1*]y6, one of them was ftiot by a mafter of a ftiip : its head refembled that of a horfe ; the mouth was large and black, as were the eyes, a white mane hanging from its neck : it floated on the furface of the water, and held its head at leaft two feet out of the fea : between the head and neck w’ere feven or eight folds, which were very thick 5 and the length of this fnake was more than 100 yards, fome fay fa¬ thoms. They have a remarkable averfion to the fmell of caftor ; for rvhich reafon, ftiip, boat, and bark mailers provide themfelves with quantities of that drug, to pre¬ vent being overfet, the ferpent’s olfadlory nerves being remarkably exquifite. JThe particularities related of this animal would be incredible, were they not attefted upon oath. Egede, a very reputable author, fays, that on the 6th day of July 1734, a large and frightful fea-monfter raifed itfelf fo high out of the water, that its head reached above the main-top-maft of the (hip , that it had a long iharp fnout, broad paws, and fpouted water Jike a whale j that the body feemed to be covered w ith feales ) the ikin was uneven and wrinkled, and.the lower ^ part was formed like a fnake. 1 he body of this monher is faid to be as thick as a hogftiead ; his Ikin is varie¬ gated like a tortoife {hell ; and his excrement, which floats upon the furface of the water, is corrofive.'” . Not- withftanding the belief of Guthrie, and the teftimony which he produces, we cannot help doubting of the ex- iftence of the fea-ferpent. Its bulk is faid to be lo dif- proportionate to all the known animals of our globe, that it requires more than ordinary evidence to render it credible : but the evidence which is offered is fo very feeble and unfatisfaclory, that no man of found judge¬ ment wrould think it fufficient to ettablifli the truth of an extraordinary fadt. Attempts have lately been made to revive the opi¬ nion of the exiftence of mermaids and fea-ferpents. An individual of the latter, it is fuppofed, was lome time ago thrown on fliore in Orkney. Part of the Ikeleton is faid to be in the mufeum of the Univerfity of Edin¬ burgh, and another part is in the poffe.ffion of Mr Home of London, who thinks that it may have belonged to an individual of fome of the whale tribe, perhaps a monuer of that tribe ; but according to others it is to be con- fidered as conftituting a diftindl genus. We cannot avoid obferving, that this point muft remain unfettled till other fpecies of this new genus have been difeover- ed, or at leaft till an entire individual have been de- feribed by an experienced naturalift. SEA-Sicknefs, a diforder incident to moft perfons on their firft going to fea, oecafioned by the agitation of the veffel. This diforder has not been much treated of, although it is very irkfome and diftrefling to the pa¬ tient during its continuance. It lias, however, been found beneficial in afthmatic and pulmonary complaints, and the inftances in which it has proved fatal, are ex¬ tremely rare. The fea ficknefs appears to be a fpafmo- dic affeftion of the ftomach, occaiioned by the alternate preffure and recefs of its contents againft its lower inter¬ nal furface, according as the rife and fall of the ftiip op- pofe the adlion of gravity. The feas in which the attacks of this diforder are ac¬ companied with the greateft violence, are thofe where the waves have an uninterrupted freedom of adlion and of confequence bays, gulfs and channels, may be navigated with lefs inconvenience, as the waves, meet¬ ing with more frequent refiftance, the veffel does not experience that gentle uniform vacillation which in¬ duces ficknefs, and renders the head giddy. A perfon feels lefs inconvenience from the diforder in a fmall vef¬ fel on the wide ocean, on which the High tell motion of the waves makes a ftrong impreflion. He is alfo lefs expofed to it in a very large veffel deeply laden, as the waves, in this cafe, fcarcely affedl the veffel. It is in (hips of an ordinary fize, and which carry but a light cargo, that the paffenger fuffers moft from the fea fick¬ nefs. The fooner it takes place after embarkation, the continuance of it becomes the more probable. It does not always ceafe immediately on landing, but in fome cafes continues for a conliderable time. Many methods of preventing, or at leaft of mitigat¬ ing this diforder, have been recommended, of which the moft efficacious appear to be the following. 1. Not to go on board immediately after eating, and not to eat, when on board, any large quantity at a time. Sea. 2. To SEA [ 70 ] SEA 2. To take muck exercife, Avitk as little intermiffion as poflible j as indolent paffengers are always the greateft fufferers from the diforder. 3. To keep much upon deck, even when the weather is ftormy, as the fea breeze is not fo apt to affedt the ftomach as the impure air of the cabin, rendered fo for Want of proper circulation. 4. Not to watch the motion of the waves, particularly when ftrongly agitated with tempeft. 5. Carefully to (bun all employments by which the mind may be haraffed, as reading, ftudying, gaming, &c. and to feek all opportunities of mental relaxation. 6. To drink occafionally liquids containing carbonic acid, as the froth of beer ftrongly fermented, or wine and Seltzer water mixed together, and fweetened with pounded fugar. 7. It will alfo be beneficial to take fulphuric acid dulcified, dropped on a bit of fugar, or in peppermint water, or ten drops of ether. The proper diet confifts of bread and frefh meat, to be eaten cold with pepper. All fweet favoured food fhould be carefully avoided, and the paflenger ought to refrain from fat, and particularly from fuch meat as is in the fmalleft degree tainted. Even the fmell of flowers is injurious, for which reafon marine produftions ought not to be examined ; but the fumes of vinegar may be advantageoutly inhaled. The drink fhould confift of lemonade or tart wines, but never of common water. An accidental diarrhoea has often relieved the patient from fea-ficknefs, and therefore a gentle laxa¬ tive in fuch a diforder feems to be indicated. It will alfo be found ufeful to apply a tonic anodyne plafter to the pit of the ftomach, fpread upon leather, and covered with linen. When fymptoms of vomiting appear, they may often be remedied by the patient placing himfelf in a horizon¬ tal pofition on his back or belly, and lying perfedtly ftill. If the fits of vomiting are too violent to be re- prefled, they fhould be promoted by a ftrong dofe of fait Avater ; not, however, to be often repeated, as it debilitates the ftomach. When the emetic operates, the patient fhould bend his body, bringing his knees to¬ wards his breaft, and fupporting his head againft a firm refting-place. His garters and cravat muft be untied, a precaution which will fecure him from the danger of a rupture. The vomiting having fubfided, a ftate of repofe will prevent its return, and the eyes may be kept fhut for a confiderable time. The patient muft make choice of a cool, ventilated place, remembering to keep himfelf warm and well clothed, as perfpiration is highly bene¬ ficial. A gargle of fugar diflblved in vinegar is to be taken in the morning, accompanied with frequent and fpare eating. Water mull never be taken in its pure Sea. ftate, but mixed with wine, vinegar, or brandy. A u—“V glafs of wine may be taken in the morning,'vvith an in- fufion of orange peel, gentian root, or peruvian bark. A glafs of punch occafionally taken will be extremely beneficial, by which perfpiration is promoted. Perfons aceuftomed to fmoke tobacco, will find the ufe of the pipe falutary on fuch occafions, but the praftice of fmoking will be injurious to all others. We may add that Warm clothing, flannel Hurts, caps, trowfers, &c. are powerful remedies againft exceflive expectoration, with every other fymptom of this dread¬ ful malady. SEA-Star. See Asterias, ^ Helminthology /«- SEA-Urchin. See Echinus, £ dex. SEA-Water, the fait water of the fea. The principal falts contained in fea-water are, ift, Common marine or culinary fait, compounded of foffil alkali or foda and marine acid 5 2dly, A fait formed by the union of the fame acid with magnefian earth ; and, laftly, A fmall quantity of felenite. The quantity of faline matter contained in a pint of fea-water, in the Britifti feas, is, according to Neumann, about one ounce in each pint (a). The faltnefs of this water is fuppofed to arife from numerous mines and mountains of fait difperfed here and there in the depths of the fea. Dr Halley fuppofes that it is probable the greatert part of the fea-falt, and of all fait lakes, as the Cafpian fea, the Dead fea, the lake of Mexico, and the Titicaca in Peru, is derived from the water of the rivers which they receive : and fince this fort of lakes has no exit or difcharge but by the exhala¬ tion of vapours, and alfo fince thefe vapours are entirely frefti or devoid of fuch particles, it is certain that the faltnefs of the fea and of fuch lakes muft from time to time increafe 5 and therefore the faltnefs at this time muft be greater than at any time heretofore. He further adds, that if, by experiments made in differ¬ ent ages, we could find the different quantity of fait which the fame quantity of water (taken up in the fame place, and in all other the fame circumftances) would afford, it would be eafy from thence, by rules of proportion, to find the age of the world very nearly, or the time wherein it has been acquiring its prefent faltnefs. This opinion of Dr Halley is fo improbable, that it is furprifing fo acute a philofopher could have adopted it. That frefti water rivers ftiould in the courfe of many thoufand years produce faltnefs in the fea, is quite incredible. If this were the cafe, every fea or great body of water which receives rivers muft be fait, and muft pofiefs a degree of faltnefs in proportion to the quantity of water which the rivers difcharge. But (a) In Bergman’s analyfis of fea-water taken up in the beginning of June 1776, about the latitude of the Ca¬ naries from the depth of 60 fathoms, the folid contents of a pint of the water were, ’ Grs. 1 5. 5 Grs. or 5 1 iot9t Of common fait Salited magnefia Gypfum Total 253tt 69TT 8tV 3 3° A ( SEA [ 7 fo far is this from being true, that the Palus Meotis and the great lakes in America do not contain fait but frelh water. It may indeed be objected, that the quan¬ tity of fait which the rivers carry along with them and depofit in the fea, mult depend on the nature of the foil through which they flow, which may in fome places contain no fait at all : and this may be the reafon why the great lakes in America and the Palus Meotis are frefu. But to this opinion, which is merely hypotheti¬ cal, there are unfurmountable objeflions. It is a curious fafit that the faltnefs of the fea is greatetl under the line, and diminilhes gradually as we advance to the poles : We muft therefore fuppofe, if Dr Halley’s theory be true, that the earth contains more fait in the tropical regions than in the temperate zones, and more in the temperate zones than in the frigid j and confequendy that the rivers in thefe different regions contain a quan¬ tity of fait proportionable to their diftance from the equator. This, however, muft be firft proved by ex¬ periment, and cannot be affumed as an eftablifhed fa6t. But there is another circumftance that entirely deftroys this theory. If we allow that the fea receives its falt¬ nefs from the rivers, it muft be equally fait or nearly fo in every part of the earth. For, according to a Ample and well known principle in chemiftry, “ when any iub- ftance is diffolved in water with the afliftance of agita¬ tion, at whatever part of the water it is introduced, it will be equally diffufed through the whole liquid.” Now though it were true that a greater quantity of fait were introduced into the fea under the line than towards the poles, from the conftant agitation occafioned by the wind and tide, the fait muft foon pervade the whole mafs of water. To fay that the fuperior degree of heat in the tropical regions may diiTolve a greater quantity of fait, will not deftroy our argument •, for it is an efta- bliftied principle in chemiftry, that cold water will dif- folve nearly as great a quantity of fait as hot water can diflolve. The faltnefs of the fea has alfo been afcribed to the folution of fubterraneous mines of fait, which is fuppofed to abound in the bottom of the fea and along its fliores. But this hypothefis cannot be fupported. If the fea were conftantly diffolving fait, it would foon become faturated •, for it cannot be faid that it is depri¬ ved of any part of its fait by evaporation, fince rain¬ water is frefti. If the fea were to become faturated, neither fifties nor vegetables could live in it. We muft therefore defpair of being able to account for the falt¬ nefs of the fea by fecond caufes ; and muft fuppofe that it has been fait from the creation. It is impoflible in¬ deed to fuppofe that the waters of the fea were at any period freth fince the formation of fifties and fea-plants : for as thefe will not live in water faturated with fait, neither will they live in water that is frefti ; we therefore conclude that the faltnefs of the fea has been nearly the fame in all ages. This is the fimpleft hypothefis of the three that has been mentioned. It explains beft the various phenomena, and is involved in feweft difficulties. We ftiall, however, allow that there may be fome ex¬ ceptions •, that the faltnefs of fome feas, or of particular parts of the fame fea, may be increafed by mines of rock-falt difperfed near its ftiores. With regard to the ufe of thh fait property of fea- water, it is obferved, that the faltnefs of the fea pre- ferves its waters pure and fweet, which otherwife would i ] SEA corrupt and ftink like a filthy lake, and confcquently that none of the myriads of creatures which now live k*" therein could then have a being. From thence alfo the fea water becomes much heavier, and therefore (hips of greater fize and quantity may be ufed thereon. Salt¬ water alfo doth not freeze fo foon as frefti-water, whence the feas are more free for navigation. We have a dif- fertation, by Dr Rulfel, concerning the medical ufes of fea-water in difeafes of the glands, &c. wherein the au¬ thor premifes fome obfervations upon the nature of fea-water, conlidered as impregnated with particle* of all the bodies it pafles over, fuch as fubmarine plants, filh, falls, minerals, &c. and faturated with their feveral ef¬ fluvia, to enrich it and keep it from putrefaction : whence this fluid is fuppofed to contraCl a foapinefs; and the whole collection, being pervaded by the fulphureous fleams paffing through it, to conftitute what we call fea-water ; the confeffed diftinguiftiing charaCteriftics of which are faltnefs, bitternefs, nitrofity, and unCtuofity : whence the author concludes, that it may be juftly ex- peCted to contribute fignally to the improvement of phyfic. The cafes in which our author informs us we are to expeCt advantages from fea-water are, I. In all recent obltruCtions of the glands of the inteftines and mefentery. 2. All recent obftruftions of the pulmo¬ nary glands, and thofe of the vifeera, which frequently produce confumptions. 3. All recent glandular fwel- lings of the neck, or other parts. 4. Recent tumours of the joints, if they are not fuppurated, or become fchirrous or cancerous, and have not carious bones for their caufe. 5. Recent defluxions upon the glands of the eyelids. 6. All defoedations of the fldn, from an eryfipelas to a lepra. 7. Difeafes of the glands of the nofe, with their ufual companion a thicknefs of the lip. 8. ObftruCIions of the kidneys, where there is no in¬ flammation, and the ftone not large. 9. In recent ob- ftrudions of the liver, this method will be proper, where it prevents conftipations of the belly, and affifts other medicines direCled in iCterical cafes. The fame remedy is faid to be of fignal fervice in the bronchocele 5 and is likewife recommended for the prevention of thofe bilious colics that fo frequently affeft our ma¬ riners. Prefervation of SEA-Water from PutrefaBion. As it is fometimes neceflary to preferve fea-water in calks for bathing and other purpofes, it is of importance to know how to keep it from putrefaftion. Many experiments were made to determine this point by Mr Henry, and are recorded in the firft volume of the Memoirs of the Literary and Philofophical Society of Manchefter. His firft experiment we ftiall here prefent to our readers. “ To one quart of fea-water were added two fcruples of frefti quick-lime •, to another, half an ounce of com¬ mon culinary fait ; and a third was kept as a ftandard without any addition. The mouths of the bottles being loofely covered with paper, they were expofed to the adtion of the fun in fome of the hotteft weather in fummer. In about a week the ftandard became very offenfive and the water, with the additional quantity of fait, did not continue fweet many hours longer 5 whereas that with lime continued many months without ever exhibiting the leaft marks of putridity.” When he added a dram more of quicklime, the whole of the magnefia contained in the water was feparated ; and when a further addition was made, a lime-water was immediately SEA [ 72 ] SEA Sea- Iramediately formed. He therefore concluded, that two v fcruples of quicklime are fufficient to preferve a quart of fea-water. The proportions, however, may vary a little, according to the ilrength of the quicklime em- 1 ployed. Different FreJJjenitig of SEA-Water. The method of making methods of fea-water frelh was long a defideratum in navigation, frelliening j\jany metl10ds have been propofed for this purpofe. Mr lea-water, pUbli{hed an account of a procefs which he had inftituted in the year 1734. He dillilled fea-water with a quantity of /apis infernalis and calcined bones 5 but this procefs was foon laid alide, as it w'as not only difficult in itfelf, but rendered the water unpalatable. Dr Butler propofed foap-leys in place of Mr Appleby’s ingredients j but the water was Itill liable to the fame objeftion. Dr Stephen Hales recommended powdered chalk ; but his method was expenfive, and did not im¬ prove the tafte of the water. Dr Lind of Portfmouth diftilled fea-water without any ingredients •, but as the experiment he made was performed in a veflel contain¬ ing only two quarts, with a glafs receiver, in his Itudy, 2 nothing conclufive can be drawn from it for the ufe of Dr Irving’s, failors. At length Dr Irving brought the procefs to a very high degree of fimplicity and perfe&ion, by which the water is obtained pure, without much expence of fuel or a complicated apparatus. For this valuable dif- covery he received a reward of 5000I. The advantages of this method remain to be dated, which may be redu¬ ced to the following : I. The abolifhing all dills, dill- heads, worm-pipes, and their tubes, which occupy fo much fpace as to render them totally incompatible with the neceffary bufmefs of the diip *, and ufmg in the room of thefe the ffiip’s kettle or boiler, to the top whereof may occadonally be applied a fimple tube, which can be ealily made on board a veffel at fea, of iron plate, dove funnel, or tin ffieet *, fo that no fituation can prevent a drip from being completely fupplied with the means of diddling fea-water. 2. In confequence of the principles of didillation being fully afcertained, the contrivance of the fimpled means of obtaining the greated quantity of diddled water, by making the tube diffidently large to receive the whole column of vapour, and placing it nearly in a horizontal diredion, to prevent any com- preffion of the duid, which takes place fo much with the common worm. 3. The adopting of the fimpled and mod efficacious means of condenling vapour j for nothing more is required in the didillation but keeping the furface of the tube always wet, which is done by having fome fea-water at hand, and a perfon to dip a ynop or fwab into this water, and pafs it along the upper furface of the tube. By this operation the vapour con¬ tained in the tube will be entirely condenfed with the greated rapidity imaginable4 for by the application of the wet mop thin ffieets of water are uniformly fpread, and mechanically preffed upon the furface of the hot tube; which being converted into vapour make way for a fucceffion of freffi (beetsand thus, both by the eva¬ poration and clofe contaft of the cold water condantly rept ated, the heat is carried off more effe&ually than by any other method yet known. 4. 1 he carrying on the didillation without any addition, a correft chemical ana- lyds of fea-water having evinced the futility of mixing ingredients with it, either to prevent an acid from rifing with the vapour, or to dedroy any bituminous oil dip pofed to exid in fea- water, and to contaminate the di¬ ddled water, giving it that dery unpalatable tade infe- Sea. parable from the former precedes. 5. The alcertaining 1 " v the proper quantity ot fea-water that ought to be didd¬ led, whereby the Ireffi water is prevented from contract¬ ing a noxious impregnation ot metallic (aits, and the veffel from being corroded and otherwift damaged by the falls caking on the bottom of it. 6. I he produc¬ ing a quantity of (weet and uholefome water, per¬ fectly agreeable to the tade, and fufficient for all the purpofes of dripping. 7- ^ taking advantage of the dreding the Ihip’s provifions, fo as to didil a very confi- derable quantity of water from the vapour, -which would otherwife be lod, without any addition of fuel. To dim up the merits of this method in a few words : The ufe of a fimple tube, of the mod eafy condruCtion, , applicable to any drip’s kettle. The rejeCling all ingre¬ dients j afeertaining the proportion of w ater to be di¬ ddled, with every advantage of qualityfaving of fuel, and prefervation of boilers. The obtaining freih water, wholefome, palatable, and in fufficient quantities. Ta¬ king advantage of the vapour which afeends in the ket¬ tle while the Ihip’s providons are boiling. All thefe advantages are obtained by the above-mentioned fimple addition to the common drip’s kettles. But Dr Irving propofes to introduce two further improvements. The fird is a hearth, or dove, fo confiru&ed that the fire which is kept up the whole day for the common budnefs of the drip ferves likewife for didillation ; whereby a fufficient quantity of water for all the economical pur¬ pofes of the drip may be obtained, with a very inconfi- derable addition to the expence of fuel. The other im¬ provement is that of fubdituting, even in the larged drips, cad-iron boilers, of a new condruCtion, in the place of coppers. . _ 3 As foon as fea-water is put into the boiler, the tube Diredtiorrs is to be dtted either into the top or lid, round which, if for diftill- neeeffary, a bit of wet linen may be applied, to makefea-w* it fit clofe to the mouth of the vefiel ; there will be no occafion for luting, as the tube aCts like a funnel in car¬ rying off the vapour. When the water begins to boil, the vapour drould be allowed to pafs freely for a minute, which will effectually clean the tube and upper part of the boiler. The tube is afterwards to be kept con¬ dantly wet, by paffing a mop or fwab, dipped in fea water, along its upper furface. The w'ade water run¬ ning from the mop may be carried off by means of a board made like a fpout, and placed beneath the tube. The didillation may be continued till three-fourths of the water be drawn off, and no further. This may be afcertained either by a gauge-rod put into the boiler, or by meafuring the water didilled. The brine is then to be let out. ‘ Water may be didilled in the fame manner while the provifions are boiling. When the tube is made on {bore, the bed fubdance for the purpofe is thin copper well tinned, this being more durable in long voyages than tih-plates. Indead of mopping, the tube, if required, may have a cafe made alio of copper, fo much larger in diameter as to admit a thin (heet of wa¬ ter to circulate between them by means of a fpiral cop¬ per thread, with a pipe oi an inch diameter at each end of the cafe ; the lower for receiving cold water, and the upper for carry it off wffien heated. When only a very (mall portion of room can be con¬ veniently allow for didillation, the machine (fig. 2.), which is only 27 inches long, may be fubdituted, as was S C YTHE S . FLATE fY7r(rLXXV//I. SERIES Sea. Plate cccclxxviii. fig. i. A [ 73 ] SEA- The principal intention of than of a compact body, and the quantity of the fluid Fig. z. 4 Lorgna’s method of frelhening it by conge Nation. S E was done in this voyage, this machine, however, is to diftil rum and other li¬ quors for which purpofe it has been employed with extraordinary fuccefs, in preventing an empijreuma, or fiery tafte. Figure i. reprefents in perfpeftive a feclion of the two boilers taken out of the frame. In the back part at D, E, are feen openings for the cocks. On the top is a diftilling tube A, B, C, five inches diameter at A, and decreafing in fize to three inches at C j the length from B to C is five feet. Near C is a ring to prevent the water which is applied to the furface from mixing with the diltilled water. In the infide of the tube be¬ low B, is a fmall lip or ledging, to hinder the diftilled Avater from returning into the boiler by the rolling of the (hip. In figure 2. A, B, C, D, reprefent a vertical fedlion of a copper box, 27 inches long, feven inches Avide, and 11 in height, tinned on the infide. In the bottom F is an aperture about fix inches in diameter, having a ring to fit on the ftill or boiler. The dotted lines Avhich run nearly horizontal, are veflels of thin copper, tinned on the outfide, two feet long, feven inches Avide, and three quarters of an inch deep. At G is a funnel to receive cold water, Avhich is coiweyed into the veflels by com¬ municating pipes, contrived in fuch a manner as to form a complete and quick circulation of the Avater through their Avhole extent. When the Avater is become hot by the action of the fleam, it is difeharged by the horizon¬ tal pipe at A. E is a pipe from which the diftilled Ava¬ ter or fpirits run, and is bent in fuch a form that the li¬ quor running from it a£ts as a val\^e, and hinders any fleam from efcaping that Avay. On the top of the box, at H, is a fafety-valve, which prevents any danger from a great accumulation of vapour not condenfed for Avant of a proper fupply of cold Avater. We (hall noAV mention a different method, difeovered by the Chevalier Lorgna, by congelation of fea-vvater. Sea-Avater requires a very great degree of cold in order to become ice. Our author found that a freezing mix¬ ture, made by mixing three parts of pounded ice Avith two parts of common fait, Avas quite fufficient to freeze it. The cold produced by this mixture is equal to about 40 beloAV o of Fahrenheit’s thermometer. A quantity of fea-Avater is never entirely congealed, a portion of it always remaining fluid j and, what is very remarkable, this fluid part is incomparably more full of fait and more naufeous than the reft : hence, if this be feparated from the congealed part, the latter on being melted Avill be found to contain much lefs fait than it did before congelation. This Ave {hall call the water of the firjl purification. If the Avater of the firft purification be again congeal¬ ed, apart of it Avill remain fluid as in the firft operation. This fluid portion Avill contain a greater proportion of fait than the reft, which is of courfe more pure, and, be¬ ing melted, forms the water of the fecond purification. Thus, by repeatedly freezing the fame fea-Avater, and feparating the fluid from the congealed part in every operation, it is at laft perfedlly purified, fo as to be en¬ tirely divefted of fait, and as fit for drink and other pur- pofes as the pureft Avater that is ufed. At firft the fea-Avater, in order to be congealed, re¬ quires a very great degree of cold, as mentioned aboAre, the ice formed in it confifts rather of feales or filaments VOL. XIX. Part I. parts bears a confiderable proportion to the quantity of ^ ice. But as the Avrater, by undergoing the fucceflive congelations, becomes more and more pure, fo it be¬ comes capable of being congealed by a Imaller and fmaller degree of cold; the ice is at the fame time more compaft, and in greater quantity j the fluid part at lalt becoming very inconfiderable. SEA-Weed, or A/ga Marina, is commonly ufed as a manure on the fea-coaft, Avhere it can be procured in abundance. The beft fort groAVS on rocks, and is that from Avhich kelp is made. The next to this is called the peafy fea-weed; and the Avorft is that Avith a long ftalk. In the neighbourhood of Benvick, the farmers mix it Avith ftable-dung and earth, and thus obtain a great quantity of excellent manure. Sea Aveed is found alfo to be a very fit manure for gardens, as it not only enriches them, but deftroys the vermin by which they are ufually infefted. SEA-Wo/f. See Anarrhicas, Ichthyology Salinefs of the SEA. See SEA-Water. South Sea. See PACIFIC Ocean, and SOUTH Sea. SEAL, a puncheon, piece of metal, or other matter, ufually either round or oval; Avhereon are engraven the arms, device, &c. of fome prince, flate, community, ma- giftrate, or private perfon, often Avith a legend or in- icrjption 5 the impreflion avhereof in wax ferves to make acts, inftruments, &c. authentic. The ufe of foals, as a mark of authenticity to letters and other inftruments in Avriting, is extremely ancient. We read of it among the .L avs and Perfians in the ear- lieft and moft facred records of hiftory. And in the book of Jeremiah there is a very remarkable inftance, not only of an atteftation by feal, but alfo of the other ufual formalities attending a JeAvilh purchafe. In the civil Eav alfo, feals Avere the evidences of truth, and were required, on the part of the Avitneffes at leaft, at the atteflation of every teftament. But in the times of our Saxon anceftors, they Avere not much in ufe in England. For though Sir EdAvard Coke relies on an inftance of King Edvvyn’s making ufe of a feal about 100 years before the Conqueft, yet it does not folloAV that this Avas the ufage among the Avhole nation : and perhaps the charter he mentions may be of doubtful authority, from this very circumftance of its being foal¬ ed •, fmee avc are allured by all our ancient hiflorians that fealing Avas not then in common ufe. The method of the Saxons Avas, for fuch as could Avrite to fubferibe their names, and, Avhether they could Avrite or not, to affix the fign of the crofs •, which cuftom our illiterate vulgar do for the moft part to this day keep up, by figning a crofs for their mark when unable to Avrite their names. And indeed this inability to Avrite, and therefore making a crofs in its Head, is honeftly avoAV- ed by CeedAvalla, a Saxon king, at the end of one of his charters. In like manner, and for the fame infurmount- able reafon, the Normans, a bravre but illiterate nation, at their firft fettlement in Fiance ufed the pradlice of fealing onty, without Avriting their names; Avhich cuftom continued Avhen learning made its Avay among^them, though the reafon for doing it had ceafed ; and hence the charter of EdAvard the Confeffor to Weftminfter- abbey, himfelf being brought up in Normandy, was Avitneffed only by his feal, and is generally thought to be the oldeft foaled charter of any authenticity in Eng- K land. Sea, Seal. SEA Seal- land. At the Conqueft, the Norman lords brought v over into this kingdom their own fadiions ; and intro¬ duced waxen feals only, inllead of the Englifh method of writing their names, and figning with the fign of the crofs. . The impreflions of thefe feals were fometimes a knight on horfeback, fometimes other devices; but coats of arms were not introduced into feals, nor in¬ deed ufed at all till about the reign of Richard I. who brought them from the croifade in the Holy Land, where they were firft invented and painted on the fliields of the knights, to diftinguilh the variety of perfons of every Chriftian nation who reforted thither, and who could not, when clad in complete Reel, be otherwife known or afcertained. This negleft of figning, and refting only upon the authenticity of feals, remained very long among us j for it was held in all our books, that lealing alone was fuf- ficient to authenticate a deed: and fo the common form of attelling deeds, “ fealed and delivered,” continues to this day j notwithftanding the ftatute 29 Car. If. c. 3. revives the Saxon cuftom, and exprefsly dire&s the fign¬ ing in all grants of lands and many other fpecies of deeds : in which, therefore, figning feems to be now as neceffary as fealing, though it hath been fometimes held that the one includes the other. The king’s great feal is that whereby all patents, commiffions, warrants, &c. coming down from the king are fealed •, the keeping whereof is in the hands of the lord chancellor. The king’s privy feal is a feal that is ufually firll fet to grants that are to pafs the great feal. Seal. See KEEPER of the Privy Seal. SEA Seal is alfo ufed for the wax or lead, and the im- Seal, preflion thereon affixed to the thing fealed. An amalgam of mercury with gold, reduced to the _ _ confidence of butter, by itraining off part of the mer¬ cury through leather, has been recommended as a pro¬ per material for taking off the impreffion of feals in wax. In this ftate, the compound fcarcely contains one part of mercury to two of gold; yet is of a filver whitenefs, as if there was none of the precious metal in it. In this ftate it grows foft on being warmed or worked be¬ tween the fingers; and is therefore proper for the pur- pofe above mentioned, but is not fuperior to fome amal¬ gams made with the inferior metals, as is well known to fome impoftors, who have fold for this ufe amalgams of the bafe metals as curious preparations of gold. Seal. See Phoca, Mammalia Index. SEALER, an officer in chancery appointed by the lord chancellor or keeper of the great feal, to feal the writs and inftruments there made in his prefence. SEALING, in Archite&ure, the fixing a piece of wood or iron in a wall with plafter, mortar, cement, lead, or other folid binding. For ftaples, hinges, and joints, plafter is very proper. Sealing- Wax. See Wax. SEAM, or Seme, of corn, is a meafure of eight bu- ftiels. Seam of Glafs, the quantity of 1 20 pounds, or 24 ftones, each five pounds weight. The feam of wood is an horfe-load working. Seam, in mines, the fame with a ftratum or bed; as a feam of coal. [ 74 1 SEAMANSHIP. Definition. T) Y this word we exprefs that noble art, or, more -C' purely, the qualifications which enable a man to exercife the noble art of working a ftiip. A seaman, in the language of the profeffion, is not merely a mari¬ ner or labourer on board a ftiip, but a man who under- ftands the ftru&ure of this wonderful machine, and eve¬ ry fubordinate part of its mechanifm, fo as to enable him to employ it to the beft advantage for puftiing her for¬ ward in a particular direflion, and for avoiding the num- berlefs dangers to which Ihe is expofed by the violence of the winds and waves. He alfo knows what courfes can be held by the ffiip, according to the wind that blows, and what cannot, and which of thefe is moft con¬ ducive to her progrefs in her intended voyage; and he rauft be able to perform every part of the neceffary ope¬ ration with his own hands. As the feamen exprefs it, he muft be able to “ hand, reef, and fteer.” We are juftified in calling it a noble art, not only by its importance, which it is quite needlefs to amplify or embellilh, but by its immenfe extent and difficulty, and the prodigious number and variety of principles on which it is founded—all of which muft be poffeffed in fuch a manner that they ffiall offer themfelves without reflec¬ tion in an inftant, otherwife the pretended feaman is but a lubber, and cannot be trufted on his watch. The art is pra&ifed by perfons without what we call education, and in the humbler walks of life, and there¬ fore it fuffers in the eftimation of the carelefs fpc&ator. Importance of it. It is thought little of, becaufe little attention is paid to it. But if multiplicity, variety, and intricacy of principles, and a fyftematic knowledge of thefe prin¬ ciples, intitle any art to the appellation of fcientifc and liberal, feamanlhip claims thefe epithets in an eminent degree. We are amufed with the pedantry of the fea¬ man, which appears in his whole language. Indeed it is the only pedantry that amufes. A fcholar, a foldier, a lawyer, nay, even the elegant courtier, would difguft us, were he to make the thoufandth part of the allufions to his profeffion that is well received from the jolly fea¬ man ; and we do the feaman no more than juftice. His profeffion mufl engrofs his whole mind, otherwife he can never learn it. He poffeffes a prodigious deal of know¬ ledge ; but the honeft tar cannot tell what he knows, or rather what he feels, for his fcience is really at his fin- ^ gers ends. We can fay with confidence, that if a per- Difficulty fon of education, verfed in mechanics, and acquainted of the art, with the ftnnfture of a ftiip, were to obferve with at¬ tention the movements which are made on board a firft or fecond rate ffiip of war during a ffiifting ftorm, under the direflion of an intelligent officer, he would be rapt in admiration. What a pity it is, that an art fo important, fo diffi¬ cult, and fo intimately connefted with the invariable laws of mechanical nature, ffiould be fo held by its pof- feffors, that it cannot improve, but muft die with each individual. Having no advantages of previous educa- 75 SEAMANSHIP. tlon, trrey cannot arrange tlreir thoughts ; they can hardly be faid to think. They can far lefs exprefs or communicate to others the intuitive knowledge which they poffefe ; and their art, acquired by habit alone, is little different from an inftinft. We are as little in- titled to expedt improvement here as in the architec¬ ture of the bee or the beaver. The fpecies (pardon the allulion, ye generous hearts of oak) cannot improve. Yet a Ihip is a machine. We know the forces which •atf on it, and we knoxv the refults of its conltruclion— all thefe are as fixed as the laws of motion. What hin¬ ders this to be reduced to a fet of pra&ieal maxims,. as well founded and as logically deduced as the working of a iteam engine or a cotton mill. ’I he ftoker or the fpinner a£ls only with his hands, and may u whiftle as he works, for want of thought 5” but the mechanic, the •engineer, thinks for him, improves his machine, and di¬ rects him to a better pra£tice. May not the rough Tea¬ man look for the fame affiltance j and may not the inge¬ nious fpeculatift in his clofet unravel the intricate thread of mechanifm which connects all the manual operations with the unchangeable laws of nature, and both furnith the fcaman with a better machine and direct him to a more dexterous ufe of it ? which has We cannot help thinking that much may be done •, been zeal- nay, we may fay that much has been done. We think oufly culti- highly of the progreflive labours of Renaud, Pitot, Bou- vated by guer, Du Hamel, Groignard, Bernoulli, Euler, Komme, phi'Ao-1 ancl others ; and are both furprifed and forry that Bri- phers. tain has contributed fo little in thefe attempts. Gor¬ don is the only one of our countrymen who has given a profeffedly fcientific treatife on a fmall branch of the fubje£t. The government of France has always been itrongly impreffed with the notion of great improve¬ ments being attained by fyftematic ftudy of this art j and we are indebted to the endeavours of that ingenious nation for any thing of praftical importance that has been obtained. M. Bouguer was profeffor of hydro¬ logy at one of the marine academies of France, and was enjoined, as part of his duty, to compofe differta- tions both on the conftru&ion and the working of (hips. His Traite du Navire, and his Manoeuvre des VaiJJeaux, are undoubtedly very valuable performances: So are thofe of Euler and Bernoulli, confidered as mathemati¬ cal differtations, and they are wonderful works of ge¬ nius, confidered as the productions of perfons who hard¬ ly ever faw a ihip, and were totally unacquainted with the profeflion of a feaman. In this refped Bouguer had great fuperiority, having always lived at a fea-port, and having made many very long voyages. His trea- tifes therefore are infinitely better accommodated to the demands of the feamen, and more directly inftruftive ; but ftill the author is more a mathematician than an ar- tift, and his performance is intelligible only to mathe¬ maticians. It is true, the academical education of the young gentlemen of the French navy is fuch, that a great number of them may acquire the preparatory knowledge that is neceffary •, and we are well informed that, in this refpeft, the officers of the Britiffi navy are greatly inferior to them. Argument But this very circumftance has furnilhed to many againft the perfons an argument againft the utility of thofe per- utihty of formances. It is faid, “ that notwithftanding this fu- formanTes Per*or mathematical education, and the poffeffion of ’ thofe boafted performances of M. Bouguer, the French are greatly inferior, in. point of feamanffiip, to our coun¬ trymen, who have not a page in their language to in- flruft them, and who could not perufe it if they had it.’* Nay, fo little do the Frencli themfelves feem fenfible of the advantage of thefe publications, that no pcrfon a- mong them has attempted to make a familiar abridge¬ ment of them, written in a way fitted to attraft atten¬ tion- •, and they ftill remain neglected in their original ab ft rule and uninterefting form. We wiffi that we could give a fatisfaflory anfwer to this obfervation. It is-juft, and it is important. Thefe very ingenious and learned differtations are by no means fo ufeful as we thould expedh They are large books., and appear to contain much and as their plan is logical, it feems to occupy the whole fubjeift, and therefore to have done almoft all that can be done. But, alas! they have only opened the fubjett, and the ftudy is yet in its infancy. The whole fcience of the art muft proceed on the knowledge of the impulfions of the wind and water. Thefe are the forces which aft on the machine ^ and its motions, xvbich are the ultimatum of our re- fearch, whether as an end to be obtained or as a thing to be prevented, muft depend on thefe forces. Now it is with refpeft to this fundamental point that we are as $ yet almoft totally in the dark. And in the perform-which are ances of M. Bouguer, as alfo in thofe of the other au- cor/cflcdly thors we have named, the theory of thefe forces, by ^r™tePus which their quantity and the direflion of the ir action fun^amen. are afeertained, is altogether erroneous •, and its refults tal princi- deviate fo enormoufty from what is obferved in the mo-p^es; tions of a (hip, that the perfon who ftiould direff the operations on fliipboard, in conformity to the maxims dedueible from M. Bouguer’s propofitions, would be baffled in moft of his attempts, and be in danger of lofing the ftiip. The whole proceeds on the fuppofed truth of that theory which ftates the impulfe of a fluid to be in the proportion of the fquare of the fine of the angle of incidence •, and that its aflion on any fmall portion, fuch as a fquare foot of the fails or hull, is the fame as if that portion were detached from the reft, and were expofed fingle and alone, to the wind or water in the fame angle. But we have fhown, in the article Resistance of Fluids, both from theory and experi¬ ence, that both of thefe principles are erroneous, and this to a very great degree, in cafes which occur moll frequently in pra&ice, that is, in the fmall angles of in ¬ clination. When the wind falls nearly perpendicular on the fails, theory is not very erroneous : but in thefe cafes, the circumitances of the {hip’s fituation are gene¬ rally fuch that the practice is eafy, occurring almoft without thought •, and in this cafe, too, even confider- able deviations from the very bell pradlice are of no great moment. The interefting cafes, where the in¬ tended movement requires or depends upon very oblique actions of the wind on the fails, and its prafticability or impra£licability depends on a very fmall variation of this obliquity *, a miftake of the force, either as to in- tenfity or dire£lion, produces a mighty effedt on the re- fulting motion. This is the cafe in lailing to w indward *, the moll important of all the general problems of fea- manlhip. The trim of the fails, and the courfe of the Ihip, fo as to gain moil on the wind, are very nice things that is, they are confined within very narrow limits, and a fmall millake produces a very confiderable effe6l. The fame thing obtains in many of the nice pro- K 2 blems 7< SEAMANSHIP. blems of tacking, box-hauling, wearing after lying to in a florm, &c. The error in the fecond affertion of the theory is ftill greater, and the aftion on one part of the fail or hull is lb greatly modified by its aftion on another adjoining part, that a ifay-fail is often feen hanging like a loofe rag, although there is nothing between it and the wind ; and this merely becaufe a great fail in its neighbourhood fends off a lateral ftream of wind, which completely hinders the wind from getting at it. Till the theory of the aclion of fluids be eftablifhed, therefore, we cannot tell what are the forces which are afting on every point of the fail and hull : Therefore we cannot tell either the mean intenfity or direftion of the whole force which afts on any particular fail, nor the intenfity and mean dire&ion of the refiftance to the hull ; circumftances abfolutely neceffary for enabling us to fay what will be their energy in producing a rotation round any particu¬ lar axis. In like manner, rve cannot, by fuch a com¬ putation, find the fpontaneous axis of converfion (fee Rotation), or the velocity of fuch converfion. In ihort, we cannot pronounce with tolerable confidence a priori what wdll be the motions in any cafe, or what difpofitions of the fails will produce the movement we wifh to perform. The experienced feaman learns by habit the general effedfls of every difpofition of the fails ; and though his knowledge is far from being accurate, it feldom leads him into any very blundering operation. Perhaps he feldom makes the bed adjuftment poflible, but feldomer ffill does he deviate very far from it \ and in the mod general and important problems, fuch as working to windward, the refult of much experience and many corre£tions has fettled a trim of the fails, which is certainly not far from the truth, but (it mud be acknowledged) deviates widely and uniformly from > the theories of the mathematician’s clofet. The honed tar, therefore, mud be indulged in his joke on the ufe- lefs labours of the mathematician, who can neither hand, reef, nor fleer. After this account of the theoretical performances in the art of feamanftiip, and what we have faid in another place on the fmall hopes we entertain of feeing a perfect theory of the impulfe of fluids, it will not be expefted 7 that we enter very minutely on the fubjeft in this place ; though ufe nor is it our intention. But let it be obferved, that the may be theory is defeflive in one point only *, and although this •tem °f *s a ni°ft important point, and the errors in it deflroy the conclufions of the chief propofitions, the reafonings remain in full force, and the modus operandih precifely fuch as is dated in the theory. The principles of the art are therefore to be found in thefe treatifes 5 but falfe inferences have been drawn, by computing from errone¬ ous quantities. The rules and the praftiee of the com¬ putation, however, are dill beyond controverfy : Nay, fmce the procefs of invedigation is legitimate, we may make ufe of it in order to difcover the very circumflance in which we are at prefent miflaken : for by converting the propofition, indead of finding the motions by means of the fuppofed forces, combined with the known me- ehanifm, we may difcover the forces by means of this 8 mechamfm and the obferved motions. Defign of We fliall therefore in this place give a very general this article, view of the movements of a Ihip under fail, fhowing how they are produced and modified by the aftion of the wind on her fails, the water on her rudder and on her bows. We fliall not attempt a precife determina¬ tion of any of thefe movements ; but we fliall fay enough to enable the curious landfman to underdand how this mighty machine is managed amidfl the fury of the winds and waves: and, what is more to our with, we hope to enable the uninflru&ed but thinking feaman to gene- ralife that knowledge which he poffeffes *, to clais his ideas, and give them a fort of rational fyflem ; and even to improve his practice, by making him fenfible of the immediate operation of every thing he does, and in what manner it contributes to produce the movement which he has in view. " ^ A fliip may be confidered at prefent as a mafs of inert A fliip con- matter in free fpace, at liberty to move in every direc-fidered as tion, according to the forces which impel or refid her :*n ^re® and when die is in actual motion, in the diredlion of her courfe, we may dill confidcr her as at red in abfolute relifted by fpace, but expofed to the impulfe of a current of wateroppofite moving equally fad in the oppofite direction : for ;nl°rces* both cafes the preffure of the water on her bows is the fame ; and we know that it is poflible, and frequently happens in currents, that the impulfe of the wind on her fails, and that of the water on her bows, balance each other fo precifely, that flie not only does not dir from the place, but alfo remains deadily in the fame pofition, with her head dire£ted to the fame point of the compafs. This date of things is eafily conceived by any perfon accudomed to confider mechanical fubjefts, and every feaman of experience has obferved it. It is of importance to confider it in this point of view, be¬ caufe it gives us the mod familiar notion of the man¬ ner in which thefe forces of the wind and wrater are fet in oppofition, and made to balance or not to balance each other by the intervention of the fliip, in the fame manner as the goods and the weights balance each other in the feales by the intervention of a beam or fleelyard. IO When a fliip proceeds deadily in her courfe, withoutimpUlt'e of changing her rate of failing, or varying the diredtion of the wind her head, we mud in the firfl place conceive the accu-on *^e mulated impulfes of the wind on all her fails as precife-,to ly equal and directly opponte to the impulle ot the wa-wateron ter on her bows. In the next place, becaufe the fliip the bows., does not change the diredtion of her keel, flie refembles the balanced fleelyard, in which the energies of the two weights, which tend to produce rotations in oppofite diredtions, and thus to change the pofition of the beam, mutually balance each other round the fulcrum ; fo the energies of the adlions of the wind on the different fails balance the energies of the water on the different parte of the hull. The feaman has two principal talks to perform. The firff is to keep the (hip deadily in that courfe which will bring her farthefl on in the line of her intended voyage. This is frequently very different from that line, and the choice of the bed courfe is fometimes a X1 matter of confiderable difficulty. It is fometimes pof-skill of the fible to fhape the courfe precilely along the line of the feaman dif- voyage ; and yet the intelligent feaman knows that he played in wdll arrive fooner, or with greater fafety, at his port, 5 by taking a different courfe 5 becaufe he will gain more by increafing his fpeed than he lofes by increafing the didance. Some principle mud diredl him in the felec- tion of this courfe. This we mud attempt to lay before the reader. Having chofen fuch a courfe as he thinks mod advan- tageous, 77 IS Impulfe of the water computed in ounces on the fquare foot SEA M A ta?eous, he muft fet fuch a quantity of fail as the ftrength ef the wind will allow him to carry with fafety and ef- fe&, and mult trim the fails properly, or fo adjuft their pofidons to the direftion of the wind, that they may have the greateft poflible tendency to impel the (hip m the line of her courfe, and to keep her iteadily in that dire&ion. . His other talk is to produce any deviations which he fees proper from the prefent courle of the fliip j and to produce thefe in the moil certain, tiie fafeft, and the moll expeditious manner. It is chiefly in this movement that the mechanical nature of a fliip comes into view, and it is here that the fuperior addrefs and refource ot an expert fearnan is to be perceived. Under the article Sailing fome notice has been taken of the fir ft talk of the feaman, and it was there fhown how a ftiip, after having taken up her anchor and fitted her foils, accelerates her motion, by degrees which con¬ tinually diminilh, till the increasing reliftance of the wa¬ ter becomes precifely equal to the diminilhed impulfe of the wind, and then the motion continues uniformly the fome fo long as the wind continues to blow with the fome force and in the fame direction. It is perfectly confonant to experience that the impulfe of fluids is in the duplicate ratio of the relative velocity. Let it be fuppofed that when water moves one foot per fecund, its perpendicular preffure or impulfe on a fquare foot is m pounds. Then, if it be moving with the velo¬ city V eftimated in feet per fecond, its perpendicular impulfe on a furface S, containing any number of fquare feet, muft be m SV*. In like manner, the impulfe of air on the fame fur- face may be reprefented by n SV* ; and the proportion of the impulfe of thefe two fluids will be that of 771 to //. We may exprefs this by the ratio of ^ to I, making m M. Bouguer’s computations and tables are on the fuppolition 'that the impulfe of fea-water moving one foot per fecond is 23 ounces on a fquare foot, and that the impulfe of the wind is the fomte when it blows at . the rate of 24 feet per fecond. Thefe meafures are all J'l’tjfiQh. I hey by no means agree with the experi¬ ments of others *, and what we have already faid, when treating of the RESISTANCE of Fluids, is enough to {how us that nothing like precife meafures can be ex- pefled. It was fhown as the refult of a rational invef- tigation, and confirmed by the experiments of Buat and others, that the impulfions and refiftances at the fome furface, with the fame obliquity of incidence and the fome velocity of motion, are different according to the form and fituation of the adjoining parts. Thus the total refiftance of a thin board is greater than that of a long prifm, having this board for its front or bow, &c. We are greatly at a lofs what to give as abfolute mea¬ fures of thefe impulfions. 1. With refpeft to water. The experiments of the French academy on a prifm two feet broad and deep, and four feet long, indicate a refiftance of 0.973 pounds avoirdupois to a fquare foot, moving with the velocity of one foot per fecond at the furface of ftill water. Mr Buat’s experiments on a fquare foot wholly im- merfed in a ftream were as follow : 4-: N S H I P. A fquare foot as a thin plate - 1,81 pounds. Ditto as the front of a box one foot long ... - 1,42 Ditto as the front of a box three feet long - - - - i»29 The refiftance of fea-water is about f-g greater. 2. With refpeft to air, the varieties are as great— The refiftance of a fquare foot to air moving with the velocity of one foot per fecond appears from Mr Ro¬ bins’s experiments on 16 fquare inches to be on a fquare foot - - - 0,001596 pounds, Chevalier Borda’s on 16 inches 0,001757 — on 81 inches 0,002042 Mr Roufe’s on large furfaces 0,002291 Precife meafures are not to be expe&ed, nor are they necefiary in this inquiry. Here we are chiefly intereft- ed in their proportions, as they may be varied by their mode of aftion in the different circumftances of obliqui¬ ty and velocity. We begin by recurring to the fundamental propofi- tion concerning the impulfe of fluids, viz. that the abfo¬ lute preffure is always in a direction perpendicular to the impelled furface, whatever may be the direflion of the ftream of fluid. We muft therefore illuftrate the Diredt im- doflrine, by always fuppofing a flat furface of foil ftretched on a yard, which can be braced about in an7 diredlion, and giving this foil fuch a pofition and fueh jar t0 tjie an extent of furface, that the impulfe on it may be the yard, fame both as to direftion and intenfity with that on the .real foils. Thus the confideration is greatly fimpli- fied. The direftion of the impulfe is therefore perpen¬ dicular to the yard. Its intenfity depends on the ve¬ locity with which the wind meets the foil, and the obli¬ quity of its ftroke. We fhall adopt the conftru&ions founded on the common doftrine, that the impulfe is as the fquare of the fine of the inclination, becaufe they are fimple; whereas, if we were to introduce the values of the oblique impulfes, fuch as they have been obfer- ved in the excellent experiments of the Academy of Paris, the conftrudlions would be complicated in the extreme, and we could hardly draw any confequences which would be intelligible to any but expert mathema¬ ticians. The conclufions will be erroneous, not in kind but in quantity only *, and we (hall point out the necef- fory corrections, fo that the final refults will be found not very different from real obfervation. 14 If a fhip were a round cylindrical body like a flat A fliip tub, floating on its bottom, and fitted with a maft and fail in the centre, fhe would, always foil in the direction perpendicular to the yard. This is evident. But fhe is an oblong body, and may be compared to a cheft, whofe length greatly exceeds its breadth. She is fo flsaped, that a moderate force will pufli her through the water with the head or ftern foremoft j but it re¬ quires a very great force to pufh her fidewife with the fome velocity. A fine foiling fhip of war will require about 12 times as much force to pufh her fidewife as to pufh her head foremoft. In this refpeft therefore fhe will very much refemblea cheft whofe length is 12 times its breadth *, and whatever be the proportion of tbefe refiftances in different (hips, we may always fubftitute a box which fhall have the fome refiftances headwife and fidewife. Let EFGH (fig. 1.) be the horizontal feClion of fuch 7§ Plate CCCCLXXXX. fig. I. Makes lee¬ way when not failing •direcftiy be¬ fore the wind. 16 Kotv to find the quantity of foeway, SEAMANSHIP. fuch si box, and AB its middle line, and C its centre. In whatever dire&ion this box may chance to move, the dire&ion of the whole refiftance on its two fides will pafs through C. -For as the whole ftream has one incli¬ nation to the fide EF, the equivalent of the equal im- pulfcs on every part will be in a line perpendicular to the middle of EF. For the fame reafon, it will be in a line perpendicular to the middle of FG. Thefe per¬ pendiculars muft crofs in C. Suppofe a maft ereftcd at C, and YCy to be a yard hoi tied on it carrying a fail. Let the yard be firft conceived as braced right athwart at right angles to the keel, as reprcfented by Yjy. Then, whatever be the direction of the wind abaft this fail, it will impel the veffel in the direction CB. But if the fail has the oblique pofition Y the impulfe will be in the direction CD perpendicular to CY, and will both pufh the veflel ahead and fidewife: For the impulfe CD is equivalent to the two impulfes CK and Cl (the fides of a reflangle of which CD is the diagonal). The force Cl pulhes the veffel ahead, and CK pulhes her fidewife. She muft therefore take fome intermediate direction a b, fuch that the refiftance of the water to the plane FG is to its refiftance to the plane EF as Cl to CK. The angle b CB between the real courfe and the di- re6Kon of the head is called the Leeway ; and in the courfe of this differtation we lhall exprefs it by the fymbol x. It evidently depends on the ftiape of the veffel and on the pofition of the yard. An accurate knowledge of the quantity of leeway, correfponding to different circumftances of obliquity of impulfe, extent of furface, &c. is of the utmoft importance in thepradlice of navigation j and even an approximation is valuable. The fubjeft is fo very difficult that this muft content us for the prefent. Let V be the velocity of the ffiip in the dire£lion C b, and let the furfaces FG and FE be called A' and B'. Then the refiftance to the lateral motion is tn V* X B' X ffne *, b CB, and that to the direft motion is m V1 X A' X fine*, b CK, or V* X A' X cof. 1 Z>CB. Therefore thefe- refiftances are in the proportion of B'xfme # t° A'Xc°f-*, x (reprefenting the angle of leeway b CB by the fymbol ic). Therefore we have Cl I CK, or Cl : ID =r A'. cof. lx : B'' • fine = A': B' • -A-'-* == A : B • tan- col. 1 x gent * x. Let the angle YCB, to which the yard is braced up, be called the Trim of the fails, and expreffed by the fymbol b. This is the complement of the angle DCI. Now Cl : ID cz: rad. ; tan. DCI, =1 : tan. DCI, —1 : cotan. b. Therefore We have finally 1 : co¬ tan. b—A! : B' * tan. 1 x, and A! • cotan. bzzW • tan- A gent * x, and tan. * — cot. b. This equation evi¬ dently afcertains the mutual relation between the trim of the fails and the leeway in every cafe where we can tell the proportion between the refiftances to the direft and broadfide motions of the fliip, and where this pro¬ portion does not change by the obliquity of the courfe. Thus, fuppofe the yard braced up to an angle of 3O0 with the keel. Then cotan. 30° rz 1,732 Very nearly. Suppofe alfo that the refiftance fidewife is r'2 times greater than the refiftance headwife. This gives A'r= 1 and B'— 12. Therefore 1,^32“ 12 X tan* 17 2 2 gent z*, and tangent 'x~ —:::::0>I4434> and tan* a — 0,3 799, and x — 20° 48', very nearly two points of leewayi This computation, or rather the equation which gives room for it, fuppofes the refiftances proportional to the Iquares of the fines of incidence. The experiments of the Academy of Paris, of which an abftraft is given in the article RESISTANCE of Fluids, ffiow that this fuppofition is not far from the truth when the angle of incidence is great. In the prefent cafe the angle of in* cidence on the front FG is about 70°, and the experi¬ ments juft now mentioned ffiow that the real refiflanccs exceed the theoretical ones only T^. But the angle of incidence on EF is only 20° 48', Experiment fliows that in this inclination the refiftance is almoft quadruple of the theoretical refiftances. Therefore the lateral refiftance is affumed much too fmall in the pre¬ fent inftance. Therefore a much fmaller leeway will fuffice for producing a lateral refiftance which will ba¬ lance the lateral impulfe CK, arifing from the obliquity of the fail, viz. 30°. The matter of fad is, that a pret¬ ty good failing (hip, with her fails braced to this angle at a medium, will not make above five or fix degrees leeway in fmooth water and eafy weather; and yet in this fituation the hull and rigging prefent a very great furface to the wind, in the moft improper pofitions, fo as to have a very great effeft in incteafing her leeway. And if we compute the refinances for this leeway of fix degrees by the adlual experiments of the French A- cademy on the angle, we lhall find the refult not far from the truth ; that is, the diredt and lateral refiftanees will be nearly in the proportion of Cl to ID. It refults from this view of the matter, that the lee¬ way is in general much fmaller than what the ufual theo¬ ry affigm. We alio fee, that according to whatever law the re- whicf^<3e- fiftances change by a change of inclination, the leeway pends on remains the fame while the trim of the fails is the fame, the trim of The leeway depends only on the diredlion of the jm_dwells, pulfe of the wind ; and this depends folely on the pofi¬ tion of the fails with refpeft to the keel, whatever may be the dire&ion of the wind. This is a very important obfervation, and will be frequently referred to in the progrefs of the prefent inveftigatiofi. Note, however, that we are here confidering only the adliort on the fails, and on the fame fails. We are not confidering the ac¬ tion of the wind on the hull and rigging. This may be very confiderable ; and it is always in a lee direclion, and augments the leeway ; and its infiucence muft be fo much the more fenfible as it bears a greater proportion to the impulfe on the fails. A fhip under courfes, or clofe-reefed topfails and courfes, muft make more leeway than when under all her canvas trimmed, to the fame angle. But to introduce this additional caufe of devia-. tion here Would render the inveftigation too complicated to be of any ufe. ^ This dodrine will be confiderably illuftrated by at-xHngration tending to the manner in which a lighter is tracked a-of this doc- long a canal, or fwings to its anchor in a flream. The tr’ne Fy track rope is made fall to fome ftaple or bolt E on theexPeri~ deck (fig. 2.), and is palled between two of the timber* 2" heads of the bow D, and laid hold of at F on ffiore. 6 The men or cattle walk along the path FG, the rope keeps 19 On models and 10 on fliips. F:g- i- SEAMANSHIP. keeps extended in the direftions BF, and the lighter ar¬ ranges itfelf in an oblique poiitxon AB, and is thus dragged along in the direction a b, parallel to the fide of the canal. Or, if the canal has a current in the op- pofite diredlion b a, the lighter may be kept Heady in its place by the rope DF made faft to a poll at F. . In this cafe, it is always obferved, that the lighter fvvings in a pofition AB, which is oblique to the ftream a L Now the force which retains it in this pofition, and which precifely balances the action of the ftream, is cer¬ tainly exerted in the direction OF and the lighter would be held in the fame manner if the rope were made faft at C amidthip, without any dependence on the timberheads at D ; and it would be held in the fame pofition, if, inftead of the fingle rope CF, it were riding by two ropes CG and CH, of which CFI is in a direc¬ tion right ahead, but oblique to the ftream,. and the other CG is perpendicular to CH or AB. And, drawl¬ ing DI and DK perpendicular to AB and CG, the ftrain on the rope CH is to that on the rope CG as Cl to CK. The a&ion of the rope in thefe cales is pre¬ cifely analogous to that of the fail y ^ } tmd the obliquity of the keel to the direftion of the motion, or to the direction of the ftream, is analogous to the lee¬ way. All this muft be evident to tiny perfon accuftom- ed to mechanical difquifitions. A moft important ufe may be made of this illufra- tion. If an accurate model be made of a ftiip, and if it be placed in a ftream of water, and ridden iu this manner by a rope made faft at any point B of the bow, it will arrange itfelf in fome determined pofition AB. There will be a certain obliquity to the ftream, mea- fured by the angle B 0 £ ; and there will be a corre- fponding obliquity of the rope, meafured by the angle FCB. Let y CY be perpendicular to CF. i hen CY will be the pofition of the yard, or trim of the fails cor- refponding to the leeway b CB. Ihen, if we fhift the rope to a point of the bow diftant from B by a fmall quantity, we (hall obtain a new pofition of the ftiip, both with refpeft to the ftream and rope ^ and in this way may be obtained the relation between the pofition of the fails and the leeway, independent of all theory, and fufeeptible of great accuracy j and this may be done with a variety of models fuited to the moft ufual forms of (hips. In farther thinking on this fubjeft, we are perfuaded that thefe experiments, inftead of being made on mo¬ dels, may with equal eafe be made on a fhip-of any fize. Let the fliip ride in a ftream at a mooring B (fig. 3.) by means of a fhort hawfer BCB from her bow, hav¬ ing a fpring AC on it carried out from her quarter. She will fwing to- her moorings, till flie ranges herfejf in a certain pofition AB with refpetft. to the direGion a A of the ftream ; and the direaion of the hawfer BC will point to fome point E of the line of the keel. Now, it is plain to any perfon acquainted with mechanical dil- quifitions, that the deviation BE b is precifely the lee¬ way that the ftiip will make when the average pofition of the fails is that of the line GEH perpendicular to EB •, at leaft this will give the leeway which is produ¬ ced by the fails alone. By heaving on the fpring, the knot C may be brought into any other pofition we pleafe j and for every new pofition of the knot the ftiip will take a new pofition with refpect to the ftream and to the haw¬ fer. And we perfift in faying, that more information will be got by this train of experiments than from any mathematical theory: for all the theories of the impulfes of fluids muft proceed on phyfical poftulates with relpedft to the motions of the filaments, which are exceedingly conjectural. 21 And it muft now be farther obferved, that the fub-The coin- ftitution which we have made of an oblong parallelopi- ped for a ftiip, although well fuited to give us clear no- an olqong tions of the fubjetft, is of fmall ufe in pradtice : for it is body is next to impoflible (even granting the theory of oblique only ufe- impulfions) to make this fubftitution. A Hup is of a^G°S^ve form which is not reducible to equations; and therefore on" the adtion of the water on her bow or broadfide can only tbe fubjedh be had by a moft laborious and intricate calculation for almoft every fquare foot of its furface. (See Bezout's Gdurs de Mu them. vol. v. p. 72, &c). And this muft be different for every ftiip. But, which is more un¬ lucky, when we have got a parallelepiped which will have the fame proportion of diredt and lateral refiftance for a particular angle of leeway, it will not anfwer for another leeway of the fame fliip •, for when the leeway changes, the figure adlually expofed to the adfion of the water changes alfo. When the leeway is increafed, more of the lee-quarter is adted on by the water, and a part of the weather-bow is now removed from its action. Another parallelepiped muft therefore be difeovered, whofe refiftances ftiall fait this new pofition of the keel with refpedt to the real courfe of the ftiip. We therefore beg leave to recommend this train of experiments to the notice of the Association for the Improvement of Naval Architecture as a very promifing method for afeertaining this important point. And we proceed, in the next place, to afeertain the re¬ lation between the velocity of the fliip and that of the wind, modified as they may be by,the trim of the fails and the obliquity of the impulfe. 22 Let AB (fig. 4, 5, and 6.) reprefent the horizontal The rek- fedtion of a fliip. In place of all the drawing fails, that*^”^6'^ is, the fails which are really filled, we can always fubfti- veiocjty 0f tute one fail of equal extent, trimmed to the fame angle the fhip with, the keel. This being fuppofed attached to the and wind yard BCB, let this yard be firft of all at right anglesafeertiuned, to the keel, as reprefented in fig. 4. Let the, wind b lg'4> blow in the diredlion WC, and let CE (in the diredlion WC continued) reprefent the velocity V of the wind. Let CF be the velocity v of the ftiip, It muft alfo be in the diredlion of the ftiip’s motion, becaule when the fail is at right angles to the keel, the abfolute impulfe on the fail is in the diredlion of the,keek, and there is no lateral impulfe, and confequeutly no leeway. Braw EF, and complete the.parallelogram CFE*’, producing rC through the centre of the yard to cu. Then wC will be the,relative or apparent diredlion of the wind, and Ce or FE will be its apparent or relative velocity : For if the line C e be carried along CF, keeping always parallel to its firft pofition, and if a particle of air move uniformly along CE (a fixed line in abfolute fpace) in the fame time, this particle will always be found in that point of CE where it is interfedled at that inftant by the moving line C ; fo that if C e were a tube, the par¬ ticle of air, which really moves in the line CE, would always be found in the tube C e. While CE is the real diredtion of the wind, C e will be the pofition of the vane go S E A M A vane at the mafl head, which will therefore mark the apparent diredtion of the wind, or its motion relative to the moving (hip. We may conceive this in another way. Suppofe a cannon-ihot fired in the direction CE at the palling fiiip, and that it pafles through the mail; at C with the velo¬ city of the wind. It will not pafs through the off-fide of the fhip at P, in the line CE : for while the Ihot moves from C to P, the point P has gone forward, and the point p is now in the place where P was when the fhot paired through the mall. I he fhot will therefore pafs through the fhip’s fide in the point and a perfon on board feeing it pafs through C and p will fay that its motion w'as in the line C p. When a Thus it happerts, that when a {hip is in motion the fhip is in apparent diredlion of the Avind is always ahead of its motion the real diredlion. The line iuC is always found within diredtion of t^e an§le W<-B. It is eafy to fee from the conftruc- thcTwind ° tion, that the difference between the real and apparent is always diredtions of the w'ind is fo much the more remarkable different as tlie velocity of the fliip is greater : For the angle *7/'* WCiu or EC e depends on the magnitude of E ? or lira. IlLC CF, in proportion to CE. Perfons not much accuf- tomed to attend to thefe matters are apt to think all at¬ tention to this difference to be nothing but affedlation of nicety. They have no notion that the velocity of a fhip can have any fenfible proportion to that of the wind. “ Swift as the wind” is a proverbial expref- fion ; yet the velocity of a fhip always bears a very len- fible proportion to that of the wind, and even very fre¬ quently exceeds it. We may form a pretty exadl no¬ tion of the velocity of the wind by obferving the llia- dows of the fummer clouds Hying along the face of a * country, and it may be very well meafured by this me¬ thod. The motion of fuch clouds cannot be very differ¬ ent from that of the air below 5 and when the preffure of the wind on a fiat furface, while blorving with a ve¬ locity meafured in this way, is compared with its pref¬ fure when its velocity is meafured by more unexcep¬ tionable methods, they are found to agree with all de- firable accuracy. Now obfervations of this kind fre¬ quently repeated, {how that what we call a pleafant brilk gale blows at the rate of about 10 miles an hour, or about 15 feet in a fecund, and exerts a preffure of half a pound on a fquare foot. Mr Smeaton has fre¬ quently obferved the fails of a windmill, driven by fuch a wind, moving fafter, nay much fafter, towards their extremities, fo that the fail, inftead of being preffed to the frames on the arms, was taken aback, and flutter¬ ing on them. Nay, we know that a good fliip, with alf her fails let and "the wind on the beam, will in fuch a fituation fail above ten knots an hour in fmooth wa¬ ter. There is an obfervation made by every experienced feaman, which fliows this difference between the real and apparent directions of the wind very diftinftly. When a ftiip that is failing brifldy with the wind on the beam tacks about, and then fails equally well on the other tack, the wind always appears to have fhifted and come more ahead. This is familiar to all feamen. The fea¬ man judges of the direttion of the wind by the pofition of the {hip’s vanes. Suppofe the {hip failing due weft on the {larboard tack, with the wind apparently N.N. W. the vane pointing S. S. E. If the {hip put about, and Hands due eaft on the larboard tack, the vane will be found no longer to point S. S. E. but perhaps S. S. W. the N S H I P. wind appeal ing N.N.E. and the ftiip muff be nearly clofe- hauled in order to make an eaft courfe. The wind ap- 1 pears to have fhifted four points. If the ftiip tacks again, the wind returns to its old quarter. We have 24 often obferved a greater difference than this. The ce- Obferva- lebrated aftronomer Dr Bradley, taking the amufement^" 7 of failing in a pinnace on the river Thames, obferved ^ fubjef S X V X fin. a—v*JS, and ^/S X u X fin. a__V X fin. a_ V X fin, a We fee, in the firft place, that the velocity of the fiiip is (carteris paribus) proportional to the velocity of the wind, and to the fine of its incidence on the fail jointly ; for while the furface of the fail S and the equivalent furface for the bow remains the fame, v in- creafes or diminifhes at the fame rate with V • fin. a.— When the wind is right aftern, the fine of a is unity, . . v and then the {hip’s velocity is J m A n S fi- Note, that the denominator of this fraftion is a com¬ mon number j for tn and n are numbers, and A and S being quantities of one kind, -g- is alfo a number. It muft alfo be carefully attended to, that S expreffes a quantity of fail actually receiving wind with the in¬ clination a. It will not always be true, therefore, that the velocity will increafe as the wind is more abaft, be¬ caufe feme fails will then becalm others. This obferva- tion is not, however, of great importance •, for it is very unufual to put a (hip in the fituation confidered hither¬ to •, that is, with the yards fquare, unlefs Ihe be right before the wind. If we would difeover the relation between the velo¬ city and the quantity of fail in this fimple cafe of the , • V wind right aft, obferve that the equation v— ■ ' " +1 /nj m A gives us J n S m A —,+ll=v, and J , m A and v n o —V —v. n o and becaufe is propor*. —V—cy* and 4 5 ’ mA (V—u)* ’ n and m and A are conflant quantities, S ^ . • . tional to or the furface of fail is proportional to the fquare of the fid p’s velocity direefily, ahd to the iqUare of the relative velocity inverfely. Thus, if a ftiip VOL. XIX. Part I. N S H I P. be failing with one-eighth of the velocity of the wind, and we would have her fail with one-fourth of it, we muft quadruple the fail. This is more eafily feen in another way. The velocity of the fidp is proportional to the velocity of the wind ; and therefore the relative velocity is alfo proportional to that of the wind, and the. impulfe of the wind is as the fquare of the relative velo¬ city. Therefore, in order to increafe the relative velo¬ city by an increafe of fail only, we mull make this in¬ creafe of fail in the duplicate proportion of the increafe of velocity. Let us, in the next place, confider the motion of a {hip whofe fails {land oblique to the keel. 26 The conitruction for this purpofe differs a little from Its velocity the former, becaufe, when the fails are trimmed to any vviien ,-he oblique pofition DCB (fig. 5. and 6.), there muft be a^'Jj deviation from the direction of the keel, or a leeway the keel BC b. Call this x. Let CF be the velocity of the {hip. an[j Draw, as before, E^- perpendicular to the yard, andg^’^ an FG perpendicular to alfo draw FH perpendicu¬ lar to the yard : then, as before, EG, which is in the fubduplicate ratio of the impulfe on the fail, is equal to E^—Gjr. Now E^- is, as before, =:V X fin. a, and G^- is equal to FH, which is —CF Xfin. FCH, or =: v X fin. (b-\-x'). Therefore we have the impulfe —n S (V • fin. a—v • fin. (£-}-#)*. This exprefiion of the impulfe is perfectly fimilar to that in the former cafe, its only difference confifting in the fubduftive part, which is here ■yxfin. b-\-x inftead of v. But it expreffes the fame thing as before, viz. the diminution of the impulfe. The impulfe being rec¬ koned folely in the direflion perpendicular to the fail, it is diminiftied folely by the fail withdrawing itfelf in that direEiion from the wind ; and as ^ E may be confi- dered as the real impulfive motion of the wind, GE muft be confidered as the relative and effeftive impulfive motion. The impulfe would have been the fame had the ftiip been at reft, and had the wind met it perpen¬ dicularly with the velocity GE. We muft now ftiow the connexion between this im- Connec- pulfe and the motion of the ftiip. The fail, and con- tion be- fequently the ftiip, is preffed by the wind in the direc-!;ween t*1® tion Cl perpendicular to the fail or yard with the force ”^1 ^motion which we have juft now determined. This (in the ftate 0f the fliip. of uniform motion) muft be equal and oppofite to the aftion of the water. Draw IL at right angles to the keel. The impulfe in the direflion Cl (which we may meafure by Cl) is equivalent to the impulfes CL and LI. By the firft the ftiip is impelled right forward, and by the fecond file is driven fidewife. Therefore we muft have a leeway, and a lateral as well as a direfl refiftance. We fuppofe the form of the ftiip to be known, and therefore the proportion is known, or dif- coverable, between the diredl and lateral refiftances cor- refponding to every angle x of leeway. Let A be the furface whofe perpendicular refiftance is equal to the di- ref! refiftance of the ftiip correfponding to the leeway .v, that is, whofe refiftance is equal to the refiftance real¬ ly felt by the (hip’s bows in the direction of the keel when (he is failing with this leeway j and let B in like manner be the furface whofe perpendicular refiftance is equal to the. aflual refiftance to the (hip’s motion in the direction LI, perpendicular to the keel. (A. E. This is not equivalent to A and B' adapted to thexeflangular box, but to A! * cof.* x and B' • fin.* x). We have L therefore 82 SEAMANSHIP. B=CL : LI, and LI= CL-B Alfo, therefore A becaufe CI~ -j-LI2, we have A : \/ Aa + B1 -CL : CL and CI=CL‘^Al + BS A The refiftance in the direction LC is properly meafured by mAva, as has been already obferved. Therefore the refiftance in the diredtion IC muft be exprefled hy msjA1 B2} v2 j or (making C the furface which is equal to A2 + B2, and which will therefore have the fame perpendicular refiftance to the water having the velocity v') it may be exprefled by m C va. Therefore, becaufe there is an equilibrium between the impulfe and refiftance, we have m C v2~n SCV- fin. a—v * fin. b-\-x')* and ~ Cn2, or ^Cd2—S(V’fin. c—v fin. ^-f-^)2, and q \/ C vz= S (V * fin. a—v * fin. £-{-«)• \/ S * V • fin. « Therefore v: V • fin. a -yZ q C -j- S Sin. fin. b-\-x yj q b-\-x’ : V VS Obferve that the quantity which is the coefficient of V in this equation Is a common number ; for fin. a Is a number, being a decimal fradtion of the radius I, Sin. b--\-x is alfo a number, for the fame reafon. And m finee m and n were numbers of pounds, ■common number. And becaufe C and S are furfaces, C or quantities of one kind, — is alfo a common num- o ber. This is the fimpleft expreflion that we can think of for the velocity acquired by the fliip, though it muft be acknowledged to be too complex to be of very prompt ufe. Its complication arifes from the neceffity of introducing the leeway x. This a fife 61 s the whole of the denominator; for the furface C depends on it, be¬ caufe C is A2-f-B2, and A and B are analogous to A! cof.2 x and B? fin.2 at. Important But we can deduce feme important confequences from eonfequen- this theorem. ces (ledu- While the furface S of the fail actually filled by the the tore- wi^d remains the fame, and the angle DCB, which in going theo- future we ftiall call the Trim of the fails, alfo remains cem, the fame, both the leeway x and the fubftituted furface C remains the fame. The denominator is therefore con- ftant; and the velocity of the fliip is proportional to t/ S • V ' fin. a; that is, directly as the velocity of the wind, dire6tly as the abfolute inclination of the wind to- the yard, and diredtly as the fquare root of the fur¬ face of the fails. We alfo learn from the conftruction of the figure that FG parallel to the yard cuts CE in a given ratio. For CF is in a conftant ratio to as has been juft now demonftraied. And the angle DCF is conftant. There¬ fore CF • fin. £, or FH or G^, is proportional to Ejf, and GC to EC, or EC is cut in one proportion, what¬ ever may be the angle ECD, fo long as the angle DCF is conftant. We alfo fee that it is very poflible for the velocity of the fhip on an oblique courfe to exceed that of the wind. This will be the cafe when the number fin. a exceeds unity, or when fin. a is Vi q-^- -f- fin. b x greater than V il-f-fin. Now this may eafily s be by fufficiently enlarging S and diminifhing Z'-J-.r. It is indeed frequently feen in fine failers with all their fails let and not hauled too near the wind. We remarked above that the angle of leeway x af- fe6ls the whole denominator of the fra6Hon which ex- prefies the velocity. Let it be obferved that the angle I CL is the complement of LCD, or of b. Therefore, CL : LI, or A : B—I : tan. ICL, — I : cot. Zq and B—A • cotan. b. Now A is equivalent to A'' cof. 2^, and thus b becomes a fumffion of x. C is evidently fo, being A24-B2. Therefore before the value of this fradtion can be obtained, we muft be able to compute, by our knowledge of the form of the Ihip, the value of A for every angle x of leeway. This can be done only by refolving her bows into a great number of elemen¬ tary planes, and computing the impulfes on each and adding them into one fum. The computation is of im-*- menfe labour, as may be feen by one example given by - Bouguer. When the leeway is but fmall, not exceed¬ ing ten degrees, the fubftitution of the rectangular prilm of one determined form is abundantly exadl for all lee¬ ways contained within this limit; and we ftiall foon fee reafon for being contented with this approximation. We may now make ufe of the formula exprefting the velo¬ city for folving the chief problems in this part of the feaman’s talk. 20 And firft let it be required to determine the belt poll- Problem I, tion of the fail for Handing on a given courfe ab, when To deter- CE the direction and velocity of the wind, and its angle m’ne t'be with the courfe WCF, are given. This problem hasj^ of tlie exercifed the talents of the mathematicians ever fince fails for the days of Newten. In the article Pneumatics we Itar.ding' gave the folution of one very nearly related to it, name- cn a given ly, to determine the pofition of the fail which would ^elfthc produce the greateft impulfion in the diredlion of the direction eourfe. The folution was, to place the yard CD in fuch and veioci- a pofition that the tangent of the angle FCD may be T.t^e one half of the tangent of the angle DCW. This will qTanTe^ indeed be the bell pofition of the fail for beginning the wit‘h the motion; but as foon as the fliip begins to move in the courfe are diredtion CF, the efxedHve impulfe of the wind is di-given* miniftied, and alfo its inclination to the fail. The angle DC‘to diminilhes continually as the Ihip accele¬ rates 5 for CF is now accompanied by its equal e E, and by an angle EC e or WCw. CF increafes, and the impulfe on the fail diminilhes, till an equilibrium obtains between the refiftance of the water and the im¬ pulfe of the wind. The impulfe is now meafured by CE2 xfin.2 e CD inftead of CE2xfin.2 ECD, that is,, by EG2 inftead of E^2. This introduflion of the relative motion of the wind renders the dctual folution of the problem extremely difficult. Fig. 7- 30 Problem II. To deter- tnine the courfe and trim of the fails moft proper for plying to windward. 31 Problem III. To de- t ermine the heft courfe and trim of the fails for getting a- way from a given line of coaft. 32 Obferva- tions on the preceding problems. SEA M A difficult. It is very eafily expreffed geometrically : Divide the angle wCF in luch a manner that the tan¬ gent of DCF may be half of the tangent of DCm, and the problem may be conftrudted geometrically as fol¬ lows. Let WCF (fig. 7.) be the angle between the fail and courfe. Round the centre C defcribe the circle WDFY; produce WC to £),. fo that CQ=fWC, and draw QY parallel to CF cutting the circle in Y j bifedt the arch WY in D, and draw DC. DC is the proper pofition of the yard. Draw the chord WY, cutting CD in V and CF m T •, draw the -tangent PD cutting CF in S and CY in R. . It is evident that WY, PR, are both perpendicular to CD, and are bifeaed in V and D ; therefore (by reafon of the parallels QY, CF) 4 : 3r=Qv\f : CW, —Y W : TW, =RP : SP: Therefore PD : PS=r2 : 3, and PD : DS=2 : 1. % E. D. But this djvifion cannot be made to the bell advantage till the fliip has attained its greateft velocity, and the angle w CF has been produced. We muff confider all the three angles, a, by and x, as variable in the equation which exprefles the value of v, and we muft make the fluxion of this equation — o; then, by means of the equation B =: A' cotan. b, we muft obtain the value of b and of b in terms of x and x> With relpedl to cr, obferve, that if we make the angle WCFzr^, we have/)“«-}-; andbeing a con- ftant quantity, we have a Subftituting for a, b, a and b, their values in terms of x and x, in the fluxionary equation = 0, we readily obtain x, and then a and b, which folves the problem. Let it be required, in the next place, to determine the courfe and the trim of the fails moft proper for ply¬ ing to windward. In fig. 6. draw FP perpendicular toWC. CF is the motion of the fhip •, but it is only by the motion PC that flie gains to windward. Now CP is= CF X cofin. WCF, or v ’ cofin. (a-H?-}-#). This muft be ren¬ dered a maximum, as follows. By means of the equation which exprefles the value of v and the equation Bar A’ cotan. b, we exterminate the quantities v and b ; we then take the fluxion of the quantity into which the expreflion -y* cof. («-}-£-j-tf) is changed by this operation. Making this fluxion no, we get the equation which muft folve the problem. This equation will contain the two variable quantities a and x with their fluxions j then make the coefficient of x equal to 0, alfo the coefficient of a equal to 0. This will give two equations ivhich will determine a and aq and from this we get b—p—a—x. Should it be required, in the third place, to find the beft courfe and trim of the fails for getting away from a given line of coaft CM (fig. 6.), the procefs perfe&ly refembles this laft, which is in fa£t getting away from a line of coaft whicb makes a right angle with the wind. Therefore, in place of the angle WCF, we muft fubftL tute the angle WCMrirWCF. Call this angle c. We muft make v- Cof. (e=±:ar!r£ri=tf) a maximum. The analytical procefs is the fame as the former, only e is here a conftant quantity. Thefe are the three principal problems which can be folved by means of the knowledge that we have obtain- N s H 1 P. 83 ed of the motion of the (hip when impelled by an ob¬ lique fail, and therefore making leeway ; and they may be confidered as an abftraft of this part of M. Bouguer’s work. We have only pointed out the procefs for this folution, and have even omitted fome things taken no¬ tice of by M. Besout in his very elegant compendium. Our reafons w ill appear as we go on. The learned read¬ er will readily fee the extreme difficulty of the fubjett, and the innnenfe calculations which are ncceflary even in the fimpleft cafes, and will grant that it is out of the power of any but an expert analyft to derive any ufe from them ; but the mathematician can calculate tables for the ufe of the praftical feaman. I bus he can calcu¬ late the beft pofition of the fails for advancing in a courfe go0 from the wind, and the velocity in that courfe } 33 then for 85°, 8o°, 750, &c. M. BougUer has given aM. Bou-^ table of this kind } but to avoid the immenfe difficulty of the procefs, he has adapted it to the apparent direc-t^ie lion of the wind. We have inferted a fewr of his num-pofition of bers, fuited to fuch cafes as can be oi fervice, namely, the fails for when all the fails draw, or none Hand in the wray of:^'a™cin° others. Column ill is the apparent angle of the wind“urf^ and courfe ; column 2d is the correfponding angle of the fails and keel ; and column 3d is the apparent angle of the fails and wind. 1 1 wCF DCB I°3053' 42° 99 J3 40 — 94 25 37 3° 89 28 35 — 84 23 S2 3° 79 06 30 — 73 39 27 3° 68 — 25 — 3 wVD 6i° 23' 59 I3 56 55 54 28 51 53 49 06 46 09 43 “ In all thefe numbers we have the tangent of w CD double of the tangent of DCF. 34 But this is really doing but little for the feaman. Inutility of The apparent direction of the wind is unknown to him jhe/e calcu" till the fhip is failing with uniform velocity ; and he islatlons' ftill uninformed as to the leeway. It is, however, of fer¬ vice to him to know, for inftance, that when the angle of the vanes and yards is 56 degrees, the yard fhould be braced up to 370 30', &c. But here occurs a new difficulty. By the conftruc- tion of a fquare-rigged ffiip it is impoffible to give the yards that inclination to the keel \yhich the calculation requires. Few fliips can have their yards braced up to 37° 3°' 5 and yet reciuired in order to have an in¬ cidence of 56°, and to hold a courfe 940 25' from the apparent dire£tion of the wind, that is, with the wind apparently 40 25' abaft the beam. A good failing Ihip in this pofition may acquire a velocity even exceeding that of the wind. Let us fuppofe it only one half of this Velocity. We fliall find that the angle WC w is in this cafe about 290, and the fhip is nearly going 123® from the wind, with the wind almoft perpendicular to the fail •, therefore this utmoft bracing up of the fails is only giving them the pofition fuited to a wind broad on the quarter. It is impoflible therefore to comply with the denland of the mathematician, and the feaman muft be contented to employ a lefs favourable difpofition of bis fails in all cafes where his courfe does not lie at leaf eleven points -from the wind. L 2 Bet 34 S E A M A Let us fee whether this reftriftion, arifing from ne- cefiity, leaves any thing in our choice, and makes one eourfe preferable to another. We fee that there are a prodigious number of courfes, and thefe the moft ufual and the moif important, which we muft hold with one trim of the fails •, in particular, failing with the wind on the beam, and all cafes of plying to windward, muft be performed with this unfavourable trim of the fails. We are certain that the fmaller we make the angle of inci¬ dence, real or apparent, the fmaller will be the velocity of the fbip •, but it may happen that w'e fhall gain more to windward, or get fooner away from a lee-coaft, or any objeft of danger, by failing (lowly on one courfe than by failing quickly on another. We have feen that while the trim of the fails remains the fame, the leeway and the angle of the yard and courfe remains the fame, and that the velocity of the Ihip is as the line of the angle of real incidence, that is, as the fine of the angle of the fail and the real diredlion of the wind. Fig. 8, Let the {hip AB (fig. 8.) hold the courfe CF, with the wind blowing in the direction WC, and having her yards DCD braced up to the fmalleft angle BCD which the rigging can admit. Let CF be to CE as the velocity of the (hip to the velocity of the w’ind ; join FE and draw C w parallel to EF ; it is evident that FE is the relative motion of the wind, and w CD is the relative incidence on the fail. Draw FO parallel to the yard DC, and defcribe a circle through the points COF; then we fay that if the (hip, with the fame wind and the fame trim of the fame drawing fails, be made to fail on any other courfe C f, her velocity along CF is to the velocity along Cf as CF is to C f; or, in other words, the fliip will employ the fame time in going from C to any point of the circumference CFO. Join fO. Then, becaufe the angles CFO, cfO are on the fame chord CO, they are equal, and fO is pa¬ rallel to d C d, the new pofition of the yard correfpond- ing to the new pofition of the keel a b, making the angle d C Z'rrDCB. Alfo, by the nature of the circle, the line CF is to Cf as the fine of the angle CFO to the fine of the angle COf that is (on account of the parallels CD, OF and C d, O f), as the fine of WCD to the fine of WC d. But when the trim of the fails remains the fame, the velocity of the fliip is as the fine of the angle of the fail wuth the dire£lion of the wind ; therefore CF is to C f as the velocity on CF to that on Cf and the propofition is demonftrated. To deter- Let it now be required to determine the beft courfe mine the for avoiding a rock K lying in the direction CR, or for belt eourfe withdrawing as fall as poffible from a line of coaft PQ. tng^ ro-k Draw CM through R, or parallel to PQ, and let m be the middle of the arch C m M. It is plain that m is the mofi: remote from CM of any point of the arch C m M, and therefore the fhip will recede farther from the coaft PQ^ in any given time by holding the courfe C m than by any other courfe. This courfe is eafily determined; for the arch C tn M =r36o°— (arch CO -{-arch QM), and the arch CO is the meafure of twice the angle CFO, or twice the angle DCB, or twice bfx, and the arch OM mea- fures twice the angle ECM. Thus, fuppofe the lharpeft poftible trim of the fails to be 3 50, and the obferved angle ECM to be 70° 5 then CO-{-OM is 7o°-j-i400 or 2100. This beingta- N S H I P. ken from 360°, leaves 150°, of which the half M m is 750, and the angle MC m is 370 30'. This added to FCM makes TLCm 107° 30', leaving WC m,=zt]20 30', and the fhip muft hold a courfe making an angle of 72° 30' with the real diredlion of the wind, and W CD will be 370 30'. This fuppofes no leeway. But if we know that un¬ der all the fail which the fhip can carry with fafety and advantage fhe makes 5 degrees of leeway, the angle DC to of the fail and courfe, or b-\-x, is 40°. Then CO-{-OM=r 220°, which being taken from 360° leaves 140°, of which the half is 70°, —M to, and the angle PJC to = 350, and EC to — 105°, and WC m — 750, and the fhip muft lie with her head 7o°from the wind, making 5 degrees of leeway, and the angle WCD is 35°- l he general rule for the pofition of the fhip is, t/iat the line on fbipboard which bifcBs the angle b-f-x may alfo bifcB the angle WCM, or make the angle between the courfe and the line from which we wifh to withdraw equal to the angle between the fail and the real direc¬ tion of the wind. ^,6 It is plain that this problem includes that of plying Corollaries, to windward. We have only to fuppofe ECM to be 90° then, taking our example in the fame fhip, with the fame trim and the fame leeway, we have Z'-j-.v—40°. This taken from 90° leaves 50° and WC//—9c—2qz= 65, and the fliip’s head muft lie 6o°from the wind, and the yard muft be 250 from it. It muft be obferved here, that it is not always eligi¬ ble to fele<5l the courfe which will remove the fliip faft- eft from the given line CM ; it may be more prudent to remove from it more fecurely though more flowly. In fuch cafes the procedure is very Ample, viz. to fliape the courfe as near the wind as is poffible. The reader will alfo eafily fee that the propriety of thefe pra£!ices is confined to thofe courfes only where the practicable trim of the fails is not fufficienlly fliarp. Whenever the courfe lies fo far from the wind that it is pofiible to make the tangent of the apparent angle of the wind and fail double the tangent of the fail and courfe, it fliould be done. Thefe are the chief pradical confequences which can The adjuft- be deduced from the theory. But we fliould confider ment of the how far this adjuftment of the fails and courfe can be performed. And here occur difficulties fo great as to^ 'n t-'ie A ^ theory nn— make it almoft impracticable. We have always fuppo- practicable. fed the pofition of the furface of the fail to be diftinCtly obfervable and meafurable ; but this can hardly be af¬ firmed even with refpeCt to a fail ftretched on a yard.. Here we fuppofed the furface of the fail to have the fame inclination to the keel that the yard has. This is by no means the cafe 5 the fail affumes a concave form,, of which it is almoft impoffible to affign the direction of the mean impulfe. We believe that this is always- confiderably to leeward of a perpendicular to the yard, lying between Cl and CE (fig. 6.). This is of fome advantage, being equivalent to a (harper trim. We can¬ not affirm this, however, with any confidence, becaufe it renders the impulfe on the weather-leech of the fail fo exceedingly feeble as hardly to have any effeCl. In failing clofe to the wind the (hip is kept fo near that the weather-leech of the fail is almoft ready to receive the wind edgewife, and to flutter or fliiver. The moft effeClive or drawing fails with a fide-wind, efpeciafly when. S E A M A- N S H I P. ■when plying to windward, are the flay fails. We be¬ lieve that it is impoflible to fay, with any thing ap¬ proaching to precifion, what is the petition _of the gene¬ ral furface of a ftayfail, or to calculate the inteniity and direction of the general impulfe ; and we affirm with confidence that no man can pronounce on thefe points with any exa£tnefs. If we can guefs within a third or a fourth part of the truth, it is all v^e can pretend to 5 and after all, it is but a guefs. Add to this, the fails coming in the way of each other, and either becalming them or fending the wind upon them in a dirc&ion widely different from that of its free motion. Ail thefe points avc think beyond our poAver of calculation, and therefore that it is in vain to give the feaman mathema¬ tical rules, or even tables of adjuftment ready calcula¬ ted 5 fince he can neither produce that medium pofition of his fails that is required, nor tell what is the pofition 33 The theory itfelf erro¬ neous, Avhich he employs. This is one of the principal reafons why fo little ad¬ vantage has been derived from the very ingenious and promifing difquifitions of Bouguer and other mathemati¬ cians, and has made us omit the aflual folution of the chief problems, contenting ourfelves with pointing out the procefs to fuch readers as have a reliffi for thefe ana¬ lytical operations. But there is another principal reafon for the fmall progrefs Avhich has been made in the theory of feaman- (hip ; This is the error of the theory itfclf, Avhich fup- pofes the impulfions of a fluid to be in the duplicate ra¬ tio of the fine of incidence. The mod careful compari- fon which has been made between the refults of this theory and matter of faft is to be feen in the experi¬ ments made by the members of the Royal Academy of Sciences at Paris, mentioned in the article RESISTANCE of Fluids. We fubjoin another abftrafl of them in the following table j ay here col. ill gives the angle of inci¬ dence *, col. 2d gives the impulfions really obferved •, col. 3d the impulfes, had they folloAved the duplicate ratio of the fines-, and col. 4th the impulfes, if they were in the Ample ratio of the lines. Angle of Incid 90 84 78 72 66 60 54 48 42 36 3° 24 18 12 6 Impul- lion obferved- 989 958 908 845 771 693 615 543 480 440 424 414 406 400 Impulfe, as Sine J. IOOO 989 957 9°5 835 75° 655 552 448 346 250 165 96 43 11 Impulfe as Sine. ICOO 995 978 95' 9I4 866 8-9 743 669 587 coo 407 3°9 208 i°5 Here Ave fee an enormous difference in the great ob¬ liquities. When the angle of incidence is only fix de¬ grees, the obferved impulfe is forty times greater than the theoretical impulfe j at *2° it is ten times greater 5 at 18° it is more than four times greater ; and at 240 it is almoft three times greater. 39 No Avonder then that the deduftions from this theory- ami t'16 , the force B * fin.2 x muil prevail, and the body is not only retarded in its motion, but its head turns towards the -wind. But this effedt of the leeway is greatly increafed by the curved form of the (hip’s bows. This occafions the centre of eft'ort of all the impulfions of the water on the leefide of the {hip to be very far forward, and this fo much the more remarkably as Hie is (harper afore. It is in general not much abaft the foremaft. Now the centre of the (hip’s tendency to continue her motion is the fame with her centre of gravity, and this is generally but a little be¬ fore the mainmail. She is therefore in the fame con¬ dition nearly as if (he rvere purtied at the mainmail; in a diredlion parallel to C b, and at the foremafl by a force parallel to IC. The evident confequence of this is a tendency to come up to the ■wind. This is inde¬ pendent of all fituation of the fails, provided only that they have been trimmed obliquely. Grimtf This tendency of the (hip’s head to windward is call- * ed GRIPING in the feaman’s language, and is greateft in (hips which are (harp forward, as we have faid al¬ ready. This circumftance is eafily underilood. What¬ ever is the diredlion of the (hip’s motion, the abfolute impulfe on that part of the bow immediately contigu¬ ous to B is perpendicular to that very part of the fur- face. The more acute, therefore, that the angle of the bow is, the more will the impulfe on that part be per¬ pendicular to the keel, and the greater will be its ener- 4- gy to turn the head to windward. Propriety of Thus we are enabled to underftand or to fee the pro- the difpofi- priety of the difpofition of the fails of a (hip. We fee tion of the her crowded with fails forward, and even many fails ex- ’h/5 a tended far before her bow, fucb as the fprit fail, the bowfprit-topfail, the fore-topmaft (layfail, the jib, and flying jib. The fails abaft are comparatively fmaller. The fails on the mizemnaft are much fmaller than thofe on the foremafl:. All the (layfails hoifted on the main- mad may be confldered as headfails, becaufe their cen¬ tres of effort are confiderably before the ce ntre of gra¬ vity of the (hip : and not with dandihg this difpofition, it generally requires a fmall adlion of the rudder to counteradl the windward tendency of the lee-bow. This is confidered as a good quality when moderate ; be- eaufe it enables the feaman to throw the fails aback, and flop the (hip’s way in a moment, if (lie be in danger N S H I p. 87 from any thing a-head *, and the fhip which does not carry a little of a weather helm, is always a dull failer. ^ In order to judge fomewhat more accurately of the Adion of a6Hon of the water and fails, fuppofe the (hip AB the water (fig. 9.) to have its fails on the mizenmad D, the main- mail E, and foremad F, braced up or trimmed alike, pjg and that the three lines D 2, E e, Fj^ perpendicular to the fails, are in the proportion of the impulfes on the fails. The fhip is driven a-head and to leeward, and moves in the path a C b. This path is fo inclined to the line of the keel that the medium direclion of the refidance of the water is parallel to the diredlion of the impulfe. A line Cl may be drawn parallel to the lines D E e, Fyj and equal to their fum : and it may be- drawn from fuch a point C, that the adlions on all the parts of the hull between C and B may balance the momenta of all the adtions on the hull between C and A. 4- This point may judly be called the centre of effort, or Centre of the centre of refijlance. We cannot determine this point e^ort for want of a proper theory of the refidance of fluids. Nay, although experiments like thofe of the Parifian academy fhould give us the mod perfedl knowledge of the intenflty of the oblique impulfes on a fquare foot, we (huuld hardly be benefited by them : for the adlion of the water on a fquare foot of the hull at p, for inftance, is fo modified by the intervention of the dream of -wa¬ ter which has druck the hull about B, and glided along the bow Bo/?, that the preffure on p is totally different from what it would have been were it a fquare foot or furface detached from the red, and prefented in the fame pofition to the water moving in the diredlion b C. For it is found, that the refidances given to planes join¬ ed fo as to form a wedge, or to curved furfaces, are widely different from the adcumulated refidances, calcu¬ lated for their feparate parts, agreeably to the experi¬ ments of the academy on (ingle furfaces. We therefore do not attempt to afeertain the point C by theory •, but it may be accurately determined by the experiments which we have fo drongly recommended j and we offer this as an additional inducemertt for profecuting them. Draw through C a line perpendicular to Cl, that is, to be de- parallel to the fails 5 and let the lines of impulfe of the termined three fails cut it in the points 2, d, and m. This line experi- im may be confidered as a lever, moveable round C,ments’ and adled on at the points 2’, and 7/z, by three forces. The rotatory momentutn of the fails on the mizenmad is Df X fCj that of the fails on the mainmad is E f X C ; and the momentum of the fails on the fore- mad is FfxmC. The two fird tend to prefs forward the arm C 2, and then to turn the (hip’s head towards ^ the wind. The aflion of the fails on the foremad tends Equili- to pull the arm C m forward, and produce a contrary bnum pre- rotation. If the (hip under thefe three fails keeps dea- drved by dily in her courfe, without the aid of the rudder, we ^ Po(lt‘on mud have D fx f C + E •,•* . . vitv is — (fee Rotation, N° 96.), and it is ^ M'Gq taken on the oppofite fide of G from <7, that is, S and q are on oppofite fides of G. Let us exprefs the external force by the fymbol F. It is equivalent to a certain number of pounds, being the preffure of the wind moving with the velocity V and inclination a on the furface of the fail D; and may therefore be computed either by the theoretical or ex¬ perimental law of oblique impulfes. Having obtained this, we can afcertain the angular velocity of the rota¬ tion and the abfolute velocity of any given point of the fliip by means of the theorems ellablilhed in the article S2 Rotation. Action of But before we proceed to this inveftigation, we Ihall the rudder, confider the adlion of the rudder, which operates pre- Fig. xi. cifely in the fame manner. Let the fliip AB (fig. 11.) have her rudder in the pofition AD, the helm being hard a-ftarboard, while the fliip failing bn the ftar- board tack, and making leeway, keeps on the courfe ab. The lee furface of the rudder meets the water obliquely. The very foot of the rudder meets it in the diredlion DE parallel to a b. The parts farther up meet it with various obliquities, and with various velo¬ cities, as it glides round the bottom of the fliip and falls into the wake. It is abfolutely impoflible to cal¬ culate the accumulated impulfe. We fliall not be far miftaken in the defleftion of each contiguous filament, as it quits the bottom and glides along the rudder ; but we neither know the velocity of thefe filaments, nor the defledlion and velocity of the filaments gliding without them. We therefore imagine that all compu¬ tations on this fubjefl are in vain. But it is enough for our purpofe that we know the diredlion of the ab¬ folute preffure which they exert on its furface. It is in the diredlion Drf, perpendicular to that furface. We alfo may be confident that this preffure is very confider- able, in proportion to the action of the water on the fhip’s bows, or of the wind on the fails 5 and wre may fuppofe it to be nearly in the proportion of the fquare of the velocity of the ftiip in her courfe; but we cannot affirm it to be accurately in that proportion, for reafons that will readily occur to one who confiders the way in which the water falls in behind the fliip. Greateftin It is obferved, however, that a fine failer always afinefailer. fteers well, and that all movements by means of the rudder are performed with great rapidity when the velocity of the fliip is great. We fliall fee by and by, that the fpeed with which the fliip performs the angu¬ lar movements is in the proportion of her progreflive velocity: For we fliall fee that the fquares of the times of performing the evolution are as the impulfes inverfe- ly, which are as the fquares of the velocities. There is perhaps no force which a£ls on a ftiip that can be more accurately determined by experiment than this. Let the fliip ride in a ftream or tideway whofe velocity is accurately meafured; and let her ride from two moor¬ ings, fo that her bow may be a fixed point. Let a fmall tow-line be laid out from her ftern or quarter at right angles to the keel, and connefled with fome ap¬ paratus fitted up on fhore or on board another ftiip, by Vol. XIX. Part I. N S H I P. 89 which the ftrain on it may be accurately meafured ; a perfon converfant with mechanics wiii fee n.airv ways 54 in- which this can be done. Perhaps the following may r’ow to de- be as good as any: Let the end of the tow-line be fixed teraune 1 • to fome point as high out ol the water as the point of the flap from which it is given out, and let this be very high. Let a block with a hook be on the rope, and a confiderable weight hung on this hook. Things be¬ ing thus prepared, put down the helm to a certain angle, fo as to caufe the fiiip to ftieer off Iron- the point to which the far end ot the tow-line is attached. Ihis will ftretch the rope, and raife the weight out ol the water. Now heave upon the rope, to bring the fliip back again to her former pofition, with her keel in the direction of the ftream. When this pofition is attained, note care¬ fully the form of the rope, that is, the angle which its two parts make with the horizon. Call this angle a. Every perfon acquainted with thefe fubjedls knows that the horizontal ftrain is equal to half the weight multi¬ plied by the cotangent of «, or that 2 is to the co¬ tangent of a as the weight to the horizontal ftrain. Now it is this ftrain which balances and therefore mea- fures the a£!ion of the rudder, or De in fig. 11. There¬ fore, to have the abfolute impulfe Dr/, we muft increafe D e in the proportion of radius to the fecant of the angle b which the rudder makes with the keel. In a great (hip failing fix miles in an hour, the impulfe on the rudder inclined 30° to the keel is not lefs than 3000 pounds. The furface of the rudder of fuch a Ihip contains near 80 fquare feet. It is not, however, very neceffary to know this abfolute impulfe D r/, be- caufe it is its part D e alone which meafures the energy of the rudder in producing a converfion. Such expe¬ riments, made with various pofitions of the rudder, will give its energies correfponding to thef pofitions, and will fettle that long difputed point, which is the beft: pofition for turning a fliip. On the hypothefis that the impulfions of fluids are in the duplicate ratio of the fines of incidence, there can be no doubt that it fhould make an angle of 540 4^ with the keel. But the form of a large ftiip will not admit of this, becaufe a tiller of a length fufficient for managing the rudder in failing with great velocity has not room to deviate above 30 from the direftion of the keel j and in this pofition of the rudder the mean obliquity of the filaments of xva- ter to its furface cannot exceed 4c0 or 450. A greater angle would not be of much (ervice, for it is never for want of a proper obliquity that the rudder fails of producing a converfion. A (hip miffes flays in rough weather for want of fufficient progreflive velocity, and becaufe her bows are miffes ftays, beat off by the waves: and there is feldom any diffi-&.c. culty in wearing the ftiip, if (lie has any progreflive motion. It is, however, always definable to give the rudder as much influence as poflible. Its furface fhould be enlarged (efpecially below) as much as can be done confidently with its ftrength and with the power of the fteerfmen to manage it •, and it ftiould be put in the moft favourable fituation for the water to get at it with great velocity *, and it fliould be placed as far from the axis of the (hip’s motion as poflible. Thefe points are obtained by making the ftern-poft very upright, as has always been done in the French dockyards. The Bri- tifli (hips have a much greater rake •, but our builders are gradually adopting the French forms, experience ha- M ving <)0 SEAMANSHIP. ving tauglit us that their (hips, when in our pofleffion, are much more obedient to the helm than our own.— In order to afcortain the motion produced by the ac* lion of the rudder, draw from the centre of gravity a line G q perpendicular to D d (D d being drawn through the centre of effort of the rudder). Then, as in the confideration of the action of the fails, we may con- peive the line <7 G as a lever connefled with the thip, and impelled by a force Dh ' qG angular velocity (fee Rotation, N° 22.) and, as was fhown in that article, this velocity of rota¬ tion increafes in the proportion of the time of the forces uniform aflion, and the rotation would be uniformly ac¬ celerated if the forces did really a£I uniformly. This, however, cannot be the cafe, becaufe, by the fhip’s change of. pofition and change of progreffive velocity, the direttion and intenfity of the impelling force is con¬ tinually changing. But if two {hips are performing fimilar evolutions, it is obvious that the changes of force are fimilar in fimilar parts of the evolution. Therefore the confideration of the momentary evolution is fufficient for enabling us to compare the motions of {hips aftuated by fimilar forces, which is all we have in view at prefent. The velocity v, generated in any time t by the con¬ tinuance of an invariable momentary acceleration (which is all that we mean by faying that it is produced by the adlion of a conftant accelerating force), is as the acce¬ leration and the time jointly. Now what we call the angular velocity is nothing but this momentary accele¬ ration. Therefore the velocity v generated in the time F ' qG / is zr t. far3, J . . 5s The expreffion of the angular velocity is alfo the ex- Angular preffion of the velocity v of a. point lituated at the di- velocity, ftance 1 from the axis G. Let 2; be the fpace or arch of revolution deferibed in the time t by this point, whofe diilance from G is Y • q G — 1. Then x — v t — k t t, and taking the ' /*. This arch meafures the whole fluent % — r Jpr' angle of rotation accompliflied in the time t. Thefe are therefore as the fquares of the times from the begin¬ ning of the rotation. Thofe evolutions are equal which are meafured by equal arches. Thus two motions of 45 degrees each are equal. Therefore becaule % is the fame m both, Y’qG . J . the quantity 7H—t* is a conftant quantity, and t* is 7‘ P reciprocally proportional to r h p ? or is proportional rp r2 . ^ f p r1 toj ■, and t is proportional to J —. That F ’qG VY-qG is to fay, the times of the fimilar evolutions of two {hips are as the fquare root of the momentum of iner¬ tia diredlly, and as the fquare root of the momentum of the rudder or fail inverfely. This will enable us to make the comparifon eafily. Let us fuppofe the lhips perfectly fimilar in form and rigging, and to difter only in length L and /; J'Y ' R1 is toJ'p r1 as Ls to Is. For the fimilar particles P and p contain quantities of matter which are as the cubes of their lineal dimenfions, that is, as L3 to /3. And becaufe the particles are fi- milarly fituated, R1 is to r* as L* to /*. Therefore P • R* : /> • r2—L5 : Is. Now F is to f as L1 to /*. For the furfaces of the fimilar rudders or fails are as the fquares of their lineal dimenfions, that is, as L1 to /2. And, laftly, G^ is to as L to /, and therefore Y • G q \ f ’ g q -zzY? \ ll. Therefore we have T2 ; _J p R* 1 ~ Y-Gq ' f'gq~V /3 = L* : /2, and T : l zz L : /. 59 Therefore the times of performing fimilar evolutions Times of fi- with fimilar fhips are proportional to the, lengths of the milar evo- Ihips when both are failing equally faft j and fince the W1 evolutions are fimilar, and the forces vary fimilarly in their 9i SEAMANSHIP. tlieir different parts, what is here demonftrated of^ the fmalleft incipient evolutions is true of the whole. They therefore not only defcribe equal angles of revolution, but alfo fimilar curves. A fmall (hip, therefore, works in lefs time and in lefs room than a great (hip, and this in the proportion of its length. This is a great advantage in all cafes, particularly in wearing, in order to fail on the other tack clofe-hauled. In this cafe (lie will always be to windward and a-head of the large fhip, when both are got on the other tack. It would appear at firft fight that the large (hip will have the advantage in tacking. Indeed the large (hip is farther to windward when again trimmed on the other tack than the fmall {hip when {lie is juft trimmed on the other tack. But this happened before the large {hip had completed her evolution, and the fmall {hip, in the mean time, has been going forward on the other tack, and going to windward. She will therefore be before the large {hip’s beam, and perhaps as far to windward. We have feen that the velocity of rotation is propor¬ tional, cceteris paribus, to F x G y. F means the ab- folute impulfe on the rudder or fail, and is always per¬ pendicular to its furface. This abfolute impulfe on a fail depends on the obliquity of the wind to its furface. The ufual theory fays, that it is as the fquare of the fine of incidence : buFwe find this not true. We muft content ourfelves with exprefling it by fome as yet un¬ known fumftion

i fential requilites in a Ihip. Ofimpor- We believe that this is the chief circumftance in termine die W^at *S ca^e(* t^e tr'm a &ip i an^ were great\y beft place 6 to be willted that the belt place for the centre of gravi- for a fhip’s ty could be accurately afcertained. A praftice pre¬ centre of vails, which is the oppofite of what we are now ad- gravity. vancing. It is ufual to load a Ihip fo that her keel is not horizontal, but lower abaft. This is found to im¬ prove her fteerage. The reafon of this is obvious. It increafes the afting furface of the rudder, and allows the water to come at it with much greater freedom and regularity 5 and it generally diminilhes the griping of the Ihip forward, by removing a part of the bows out of the water. It has not always this effedl ; for the form of the harping aloft is frequently fuch, that the tendency to gripe is diminiihed by immerfmg more of the bow in the water. But waving thefe circumlfances, and attending only to the rotatory energy of the rudder, we fee that it is of advantage to carry the centre of gravity forward. The fame advantage is gained to the a6bon of the after fails. But, on the other hand, the adlion of the head¬ fuls is diminiihed by it •, and we may call every fail a headfail whofe centre of gravity is before the centre of gravity of the Ihip ; that is, all the fails hoilled on the bowfprit and foremaft, and the ftayfails hoifted on the mainmall; for the centre of gravity is feldom far before the mainmaft. Suppofe that when the rudder is put into the pofi- tion AD (fig. 11.), the centre of gravity could be Ihifted to g, fo as to increafe q G, and that this is done without increaling the fum of the produffs p r*. It is obvious that the velocity of converfion will be increafed in the proportion of ^ G to qg. I Ins is very pollible, by bringing to that fide of the Ihip parts of her loading which were fituated at a diftance from G on the other fide. Nay, we can make this change in fuch a manner that p r3 lhall even be lefs than it was before, by taking care that every thing which we Ihift lhall be nearer to g than it was formerly to G. Suppofe it all placed in one fpot in, and that m is the quantity of mat¬ ter fo Ihifted, while M is the quantity of matter in the whole Ihip. It is only neceffary that w ^ G1 lhall be lefs than the fum of the produffs p r* correfponding to the matter which has been Ihifted. Now, although the matter which is ealily moveable is generally very fmall in comparifon to the whole matter of the Ihip, and there¬ fore can make but a fmall change in the place of the centre of gravity, it may frequently be brought from places fo remote that it may occafion a very fenfible di¬ minution of the quantity J'p r*, which expreffes the whole momentum of inertia. A practice This explains a praffice of the feamen in fmall wher- of feamen j-Jpg or Ikiffs, who in putting about are accultomed to in putting jace themselves to leeward of the mall. They even about ex- " . . . *1 • 1 .• _ plained. N S H I P. boats by the way in which they reft on their two feet, fometimes leaning all on one foot, and fometimes on the other. And we have often feen this evolution very fen- fibly accelerated in a Ihip of war, by the crew running fuddenly, as the helm is put down, to the lee-bow. And we have heard it aflerted by very expert feamen, that after all attempts to wear {hip (after lying-to in a ilorm) have failed, they have fucceeded by the crew collefting themfelves near the weather fore-lhrouds the moment the helm was put down. It muft be agreeable to the refleffing feaman to fee this praflice fupported by un¬ doubted mechanical principles. It will appear paradoxical to fay that the evolution rheevolu- may be accelerated even by an addition of matter to thetion accele- ftiip ; and though it is only a piece of curiofity, our rated by- readers may with to be made fenfible of it. Let m be a two of which are radii, or lines drawn from the centre of the figure to the curve, and the intercepted arc or part of that curve. , SECTOR of a Sphere, is the folid generated by the re¬ volution of the feftor of a circle about one of its’radii $ the other radius describing the furface of a cone, and the circular arc a circular portion of the furface of the Sphere of the fame radius. So that the fpherical feftor confifts of a right cone, and of a feg\nent of the Sphere having the fame common bafe with the cone. Hence the folid content of it will be found by multiplying the bafe or fpherical furface by the radius of the fphere, and taking one third of the produft. Agronomical Sector. See Astronomical Se&or. Dialing SECTOR. See DIALING. SECULAR, that which relates to affairs of the pre¬ fect world, in which fenfe the word Hands oppofed to fpiritual, ecclejiafical: thus we fay fecular power, &.c. Secular, is more, peculiarly ufed for a perfon who lives at liberty in the World, not {hut up in a monaftery, nor bound by vows, or fubjefted to the particular rules of any religious community 5 in which fenfe it (lands op- pofed to regular. The Romifh clergy are divided into fecular and regular, of which the latter are bound by monaftic rules, the former not. SECULAR Games, in antiquity, folemn games held among the Romans once in an age. Thefe games lail- ed three days and as many nights ; during which time facrifices were performed, theatrical (hews exhibited, with combats, fports, &e. in the circus. The occafion of thefe games, according to Valerius Maximus, was to Hop the progrefs of a plague. Valerius Publicola was the firfi who celebrated them at Rome in the year of the city, 245. The folemnity was as follows : The whole world was invited by a herald to a feall which they had never feen already, nor ever fiiould fee again. Some days before the games began, the quindecemviri in the Capitol and the Palatine temple, diilributed to the people purifying compofitions, of various kinds, as flambeaus, fulphur, &c. From hence the populace palfcd to Diana’s temple on the Aventine mount, with wheat, barley, and oats, as an offering. After this, whole nights were fpent in devotion to the DeHinies. When the time of the games was fully come, the people affembled in the Campus Martins, and facrificed to Ju¬ piter, Juno, Apollo, Latoiia, Diana, the Parc®, Ceres, Pluto, and Proferpine. On the firfl night of the feafl, the emperor, with the quindecemviri, caufed three altars to be erefted on the banks of the Tiber, which they fprinkled with the blood of three lambs, and then pro¬ ceeded to regular facrifice. A fpace was next marked out for a theatre, which Was illuminated with innumer¬ able flambeaus and fires. Here they fung hymns, and celebrated all kinds of fports. On the day after, having offered viftims at the Capitol, they went to the Campus Martius, and celebrated fports to the honour of Apollo and Diana. Thefe lafled till next day, when the noble matrons, at the hour appointed by the oracle, went to the Capitol to fing hymns to Jupiter. On the third day, which concluded the foleiHnity, twenty-feven boys, and as many girls, fung in the temple of Palatine Apollo hymns and verfes in Greek and Latin, to recommend the city to the proteftion of thofe deities whom they 'defigned particularly to honour by their facrifices. The inimitable Carmen Seculare of Horace was cotft- pofed for this lafl day, in the Secular Games, held by AuguHus. It has been much difputed whether thefe games Were held every hundred, or every hundred and ten years. Valerius Antius, Varro, and Livy, are quoted in fup- port of the former opinion : In favour of the latter may be produced the quindecemviral regiHers, the edifts of AuguHus, and the words of Horace in the Secular poem, Secular 11 Secundus. Ccetus undems dccits per annos. It rvas a general belief, that the girls who bore i part in the fong fliould be fooneH married and that the children who did not dance and fing at the coming of Apollo, fliould die unmarried, and at an early period of life. SECULAR Poem, a poem fung or rehearfed at the fe¬ cular games : of which kind we have a very fine piedfe among the works of Horace, being a fapphic ode at the end of his epodes. SECULARIZATION, the aft of converting a re¬ gular per Ion, place, or benefice, into a fecular one. Al- mofl all the cathedral churches were anciently regular, that is, the canons were to be religious •, but they have been fince fecularized. For the fecularization of a rei gular church, there is requited the authority of the pope, that of the prince, the bilhop of the place, the patron, and even the confent of the people. Religious that want to be releafed from their vow, obtain briefs of fe¬ cularization from the pope. SECUNDINES, in Anatomy, the feveral coats of membranes wherein the foetus is wrapped up in thb mother’s womb j as the chorion and amnios, with the placenta, &c. SECUNDUS, Joannes Nicolaius, an elegant wri¬ ter of Latin poetry, was born at the Hague in the year 1511. His defeent was from an ancient and honour¬ able family in the Netherlands ; and his father Nicolaus EverardUs, who. was born in the neighbourhood of Mid- dleburg, feems to have been high in the favour of the emperor Charles V. as he was employed by that monarch in feveral Hations of confiderable importance. We find him firfl a member of the grand parliament or council of Mechelen, afterwards prefident of the ftates of Hol¬ land and Zealand at the Hague, and laftly holding d fimilar office at Mechelen, where he died, Augufl 5. 2 aged 7°- Thefe various employments did not occupy the whole of Everardus’s time. Notwithflanding the multiplicity of his bufinefs, he found leifufe to cultivate letters with great fuccefs, and even to aft as preceptor to his own children, who Were five fons and three daughters. They all took the name of Nicolaii from their father j but on what account our author svas called Secundus is not known. It could not be from the order of his birth, for he was the youngeft fon. Perhaps the name was not given him till he became ominent j and then, ac¬ cording to the fafhion of the age, it might have its rife from fojrue pun, fuch as his being Poetarum netntni Secundus. Poetry, however, was by no means the pro- feflion which his father wiflied him to follow. He in¬ tended him for the law, and when he could no longer direft his ftudies himfelf, placed him under the care of P 2 Jacobus SEC. [i Secupdus. Jacobus Valeardus. This man is faid to have been every ‘"“""V way well qualified to difeharge the important truft which w'as committed to him \ and he certainly gained the affeftion of his pupil, who, in one of his poems, mentions the death of Valeardus with every appearance of unfeigned forrow. Another tutor was foon provi¬ ded j but it does not appear that Secundus devoted much of his time to legal purfuits. Poetry and the filler arts of painting and fculpture had engaged his mind at a very early period 5 and the imagination, on which thefe have laid hold, can with difficulty fubmit to the dry fiudy of muily civilians. Secundus is faid to have written verfes wrhen but ten years old) and from the vail quantity which he left behind him, we have reafon to conclude that fuch writing was his principal employ¬ ment. He found time, however, to carve figures of all his own family, of his millreffes, of the emperor Charles V. of feveral eminent perfonages of thofe times, and of many of his intimate friends j and in the laft edition of his works publiffied by Scriverius at Leyden, 1631, there is a print of one of his miltreffes with this infeription round it j Vatis amatoris Julia sculpta JIANU. '; Secundus having nearly attained the age of twenty- ®ne, and being determined, a3 it would feem, to comply as far as poffible with the wiffies of his father, quitted Mechelen, and went to France, where at Bourges, a city in the Or/eanois, he lludied the civil law under the cele¬ brated Andreas Alciatus. Alciatus was one of the moll learned civilians of that age; but what undoubtedly endeared him much more to our author was his general acquaintance with polite literature, and more particular¬ ly his talle in poetry. Having lludied a year under this eminent profeffor, and taken his degrees, Secundus returned to Mechelen, where he remained only a very few months. In 1533 he went into Spain with warm recommendations to the count of Nafiau and other per- fons of high rank ; and foon afterwards became fecre- tary to the cardinal archbiffiop of Toledo, in a depart¬ ment of bufinefs which required no other qualifications than what he poffeffed in a very eminent degree, a faci¬ lity in writing with elegance the Latin language. It was during his refidence with this cardinal that he wrote his Bajia, a feries of wanton poems, of which the fifth, feventh, and ninth carmina of Catullus feem to have given the hint. Secundus was not, however^ a fervile imitator of Catullus. His expreffions feem to be bor¬ rowed rather from Tibullus and Propertius ; and in the warmth of his deferiptions he furpafles every thing that has been written on fimilar fubjedls by Catullus, Tibullus, Propertius, C. Gallus, Ovid, or Horace. In 1535 he accompanied the emperor Charles V. to the fiege of Tunis, but gained no laurels as a foldier. The hardffiips which were endured at that memorable fiege were but little fuited to the foft difpofition of a votary of Venus and the mufes *, and upon an enterprife which might have furniffied ample matter for an epic poem, it is remarkable that Secundus wrote nothing which has been deemed worthy of prefervation. Hav¬ ing returned from his martial expedition, he was fent by the cardinal to Rome to congratulate the pope upon the fuccefs of the emperor’s arms j but was taken fo ill on the road, that he was not able to complete his journey. He was advifed to feek, without a moment’s 6 ] SEC delay, the benefit of his native air j and that happily re- Secnndo* covered him. II Having now quitted the fervice of the archbiffiop of [^ecu|ort:j- Toledo, Secundus was employed in the fame office of fecretary by the biffiop of Utrecht ; and fo much had he hitherto diftinguiffied himfelf by the claffical elegance of his compofitions, that he was foon called upon to fill the important poll of private Latin fecretary to the em¬ peror, who was then in Italy. This was the molt ho¬ nourable office to which our author was ever appointed j but before he could enter upon it death put a Hop to his career of glory. Having arrived at Saint Amand in the diltrict of Tournay, in order to meet, upon bufinefs, with the biffiop of Utrecht, he was on the 8th of Odlober 1536 cut off by a violent fever, in the very flower of his age, not having quite completed his twenty-fifth year. He was interred in the church of the Benedidlines, of which his patron, the biffiop, was abbot or pro-abbot; and his near relations erefted to his memory a marble monument, wdth a plain Latin infeription. The works of Secundus have gone through feveral editions, of which the bell and moll copious is that of Scriverius already mentioned. It confifts of Julia, Eleg* lib. j. j Amores, Eleg. lib. ii. j ad Diversos Eleg. lib. iii. j Basia, flyled by the editor incomparabilis et divinus prorfus liber ; Epigrammata •, Odarum liber unus ; Epistolarum liber unus Elegiaca ; Epistola- Rum liber alter, heroico carmineferiptus; Funerum liber unus; Sylva: et Carminum fragmenta; Poemata nonnulla fratrum; Itineraria Secundi tria, &c. j EpistoLvE totidem,foluta oratione. Of thefe works it would be fuperfluous in us to give any charadler after the ample teftimonies prefixed to them of Lelius Greg. Gyraldus, the elder Scaliger, Theodore Beza, and others equally celebrated in the republic of letters, who all fpeak of them with rapture. A French critic, indeed, after having affirmed that the genius of Secundus never produced any thing which was not excellent in its kind, adds, with too much truth, Mais fa mufe ejl un peu trop lafeive. For this fault our author makes the following apology in an epigram addreffed to the grammarians : Carmina cur fpargam cunflis lafeiva libellis, Queritis ? Infulfos arceo grammaticos. Fortia magnanimi canerem fi Caefaris arma, Faflave Divorum religiofa virum : £)uot mifer exciperemque notas, patererque lituras ? Quot fierem teneris fuppliciurn pueris ? At nunc uda mihi didlant cum Basia carmen, Pruriet et verfu mentula multa meo r Me leget innuptae juvenis placiturus amicae, Et placitura nova blanda puella viro : Et quemeunque juvat lepidorum de grege vatum Otia fellivis ludere deliciis. Lufibus et laetis procul hinc abfillite, salvi Grammatici, injuftas et cohibite manus. Ne puer, ab malleis caefus lacrymanfque leporis \ Duram forte meis ossibus optet humum. SECURIDACA, a genus of plants belonging to the clafs diadelphia. See Botany Index. SECUTORES, a fpecies of gladiators among the Romans, wffiofe arms were a helmet, a ffiield, and a fword or a leaden bullet. They wrere armed in this man¬ ner, becaufe they had to contend with the retiarii, who were 4. S E D [i Stfcutores were dreffed in a ihort tunic, bore a three- pointed lance II in their left hand, and a net in their right. The reti- i Sedition. arjug attempted to caft his net over the head of the fe~ * cutor ; and if he fucceeded, he drew it together and flew him with his trident: but if he miffed his aim, he im¬ mediately betook himfelf to flight till he could find a fecond opportunity of entangling his adverfary with his net. He was purfued by the fecutor, who endeavoured to difpatch him in his flight. Secutores was alfo a name given to fuch gladiators as took the place of thofe killed in the combat, or who engaged the conqueror. This poll was ufually taken by lot. SEDAN is a town in France, in the department of the Ardennes, in E. Long. 4. 45. N. Eat. 49. 46. This is the capital of a principality of the fame name, fituated on the Maefe, fix miles from Bouillon, and fifteen from Charleville. Its fituation on the frontiers of the territory of Liege, Namur, and Limburg, formerly rendered it one of the keys of the kingdom. It is extremely well fortified, and defended by a ftrong citadel. The caftle is fituated on a rock, furrounded with large towers and flrong walls j here you fee a moft beautiful magazine of ancient arms. The governor’s palace is oppofite the caftle. From the ramparts you have a moft agree¬ able profpedl of the Maefe and the neighbouring coun¬ try. Though the town is but finall, yet it is full of tradefmen, as tanners, weavers, dyers, &c. the manu- facfure of fine cloth in this city employing a great number of hands. The principality of Sedan former¬ ly belonged to the duke of Bouillon, who was obliged in the beginning of the laft century to refign it to the crown. SEDAN-chair is a covered vehicle for carrying a Angle perfon, fufpended by two poles, and borne by two men, hence denominated chairmen. They were firft introduced in London in 1634, when Sir Sanders Dun- comb obtained the foie privilege to ufe, let, and hire a number of the faid covered chairs for fourteen years. SEDGMOOR, a large and rich traft of land in Somerfetfliire, memorable for the defeat of the duke of Monmouth, in 1685. It lies between Somerton and Bridgewater. SEDITION, among civilians, is ufed for a facHous commotion of the people, or an affembly of a number of citizens without lawful authority, tending to difturb the peace and order of the fociety. This ofl'enee is of different kinds : fome feditions more immediately threat¬ ening the fupreme power, and the fubverfion of the prefent conftitution of the ftate ; others tending only towards the redrefs of private grievances. Among the Romans, therefore, it was varioufly puniftied, according as its end and tendency threatened greater mifehief. See lib. i. Cod. de Seditiojis, and Mat. de Crimin. lib. ii. n. 5. deLcefa Majejiate. In the punifhment, the authors and ringleaders were juftly diftinguiftiedfrom thofe who, with lefs wicked intention, joined and made part of the multitude. The fame diftin&ion holds in the law of England and in that of Scotland. Some kinds of fedition in England amount to high treafon, and come within the Hat. 25 Edw. III. as levying war againft the king. And feveral feditions are mentioned in the Scotch a61s ef parliament as treafonable. Bayne's Crim. Law of Scot/and,, p. 33, 34. The law of Scotland makes riot- 7 ] S E D . ■ - ous and tumultuous affemblies a fpecies of fedition. Sedition But the law there, as well as in England, is now chiefly „ |l regulated by the riot a£t, made x Geo. I. only it is to be ■ e ey' obferved, that the proper officers in Scotland, to make the proclamation thereby ena&ed, are flieriffs, ftewards, and bailies of regalities, or their deputies •, magiftrates of royal boroughs, and all other inferior judges and ma¬ giftrates $ high and petty conftables, or other officers of the peace, in any county, ftewartry, city, or town. And in that part of the ifland, the punifhment of the offence is any thing Ihort of death which the judges, in their diferetion, may appoint. SEDATIVES, in Medicine, a general name for fuch medicines as weaken the powders of nature, fuch as blood-letting, cooling falts, purgatives, &c. SE-DEFENDENDO, in Law, a plea ufed for him that is charged with the death of another, by alleging that he was under a neceffity of doing what he did in his own defence : as that the other affaulted him in fuch a manner, that if he had not done what he did, he mull have been in hazard of his own life. See Homicide and Murder. SEDIMENT, the fettlement or dregs of any thing, or that grofs heavy part of a fluid body which finks to the bottom of the veffel ■when at reft. SEDLEY, Sir Charees, an Englifh poet and wit, the fon of Sir John Sedley of Aylesford in Kent, was born about the year 1639. t^ie federation he came to London to join the general jubilee ; and commen¬ ced wit, courtier, poet, and gallant. He was fo much admired, that he became a kind of oracle among the poets 5 which made King Charles tell him, that Na¬ ture had given him a patent to be Apollo’s viceroy. The produdlions of his pen were fome plays, and feveral delicately tender amorous poems, in which the foftnefs of the verfes was fo exquifite, as to be called by the duke of Buckingham Scdley's witchcraft. “ There xvere no marks of genius or true poetry to be deferied, (fay the authors of the Biographia Britannica) ; the art wholly confided in raifing loofe thoughts and lewd defires, without giving any alarm ; and fo the poifon worked gently and irrefiftibly. Our author, we may be fure, did not efcape the infe&ion of his own art, or rather was firft tainted himfelf before he fpread the in- fedlion to others.”—A very ingenious writer of the pre¬ fent day, however, fpeaks much more favourably of Sir Charles Sedley’s writings. “ He ftudied human na¬ ture ; and was diftinguilhed for the art of making him¬ felf agreeable, particularly to the ladies ; for the verfes of Lord Rochefter, beginning with, Sedley has that pre¬ vailing gentle art, &c. fo often quoted, allude not to his writings, but to his perfonal addrefs." \^Lan^horn's LLffufions,^^.^—But while he thus grew in reputation for wit and in favour with the king, he grew poor and debauched : his eftate was impaired, and his morals were corrupted. One of his frolics, however, being followed by an indi61ment and a heavy fine, Sir Charles took a more ferious turn, applied himfelf to bufinefs, and be¬ came a member of parliament, in which he vras a fre¬ quent fpeaker. We find him in the houfe of com¬ mons in the reign of James II. whofe attempts upon- the conftitution he vigoroufly withftood ; and he was very aflive in bringing on the revolution. This was thought more extraordinary, as he had received favours from James. But that prince had taken a fancy to Sir Charles’s S E D [ I Secllcy Charles’s daughter (though it feems (he was not very II handfome), and, in confequence of his intrigues with ^ecu ion. jier^ jie createci Mifs Sedley countefs of Dorchefter. This honour, fo far from pleafing, greatly fhocked Sir Charles. However libertine he himfelf had been, yet he could not bear the thoughts of his daughter’s dif- honour j and with regard to her exaltation, he only confidered it as rendering her more confpicuoully in¬ famous. He therefore conceived a hatred for the king; and from this, as well as other motives, readily joined to difpofiefs him of the throne, A witty faying of Sedley’s, on this occafion, is recorded, “ I hate in¬ gratitude, (faid Sir Charles) ; and therefore, as the king has made my daughter a countefs, I will endeavour to make his daughter a queen meaning the princefs Mary, married to the prince of Orange, who difpoflelTed 'James of the throne at the revolution. He lived to the beginning of Queen Anne’s reign ; and his works were printed in two vols. 8vo. 171$. SEDR, or SEDKE, the high-prieft of the feft of All among the Perfians. The fedre is appointed by the • emperor of Perfia, who ufually confers the dignity on his neared relation. The jurifdiftion of the fedre ex¬ tends over all effe£ts deftined for fnous purpofes, over all mofques, hofpitals, colleges, fepulchres, and mo- naderies. He difpofes of all ecclefiadical employments, and nominates all the fuperiors of religious houfes. His decifions in matters of religion are received as fo many infallible oracles : he judges of all criminal matters in 'Jus own houfe without appeal. His authority is ba¬ lanced by that of the muddtehid, or fird theologue of the empire. v , SEDUCTION, is the aft of tempting and drawing afide from the right path, and comprehends every en¬ deavour to corrupt any individual of the human race. This is the import of the word in its larged and mod general fenfe ; but it is commonly employed to exprefs the aft of tempting a virtuous woman to part with her chadity. The feducer of female innocence praftifes the fame ftratagems of fraud to get polfedion of a woman’s per- fon, that the /windier employs to get poffedion of his neighbour’s goods or money ; yet the law of honour, which pretends to abhor deceit, and which impels its votaries to murder every man who prefumes, however judly, to fufpeft them of fraud, or to quedion their veracity, applauds the addrefs of a fuccefsful intrigue, though it be well known that the feducer could not have obtained his end without fwearing to the truth of a thoufand falfehoods, and calling upon God to witnefs promifes which he never meant to fulfil. The law of honour is indeed a very capricious rule, which accommodates itfelf to the pleafures and conve¬ niences of higher life ; but the la\v of the land, which is enafted for the equal proteflion of high and low, may be fuppofed to vieiv the guilt of feduffion with a more impartial eye. Yet for this offence, even the laws •of this kingdom have provided no other punifhment than a pecuniary fatisfaftion to the injured family ; which, in England, can be obtained only by one of the quainted fictions in the world, by the father’s bringing his action againd the feducer for the lofs of his daugh¬ ter’s fervice during her pregnancy and nurturing. See Paley’s Moral PhilofopJiy, Book III. Part iii. Chap. 3. The moralid, however, who edimates the merit or 8 ] S E D demerit of addions, not by laws of human appointment, Sedu&M but by their general confequences as edablithed by the ^ ^ laws of nature, mud condder the feducer as a criminal of the deeped guilt. In every civilized country, and iq many countries where civilization has made but fmall progrefs, the virtue of women is collected as it were in¬ to a fingle point, which they are to guard above all things, as that on which their happinefs and reputation wholly depend. At fird fight this may appear a capri¬ cious regulation ; blit a moment’s reflection 'ivill con¬ vince us of the contrary. In the married date fo much confidence is neceflarily irepofed in the fidelity of wo¬ men to the beds of their hufbands, and evils fo great redflt from the violation of that fidelity, that whatever contributes in any degree to its prefervation, mud be agreeable to him who, in edablidiing the laws of na¬ ture, intended them to be fubfervient to the real happi- nefs of all his creatures. But nothing contributes fo much to preferve the fidelity of wives to their hufbands, as the imprefling upon the minds of women the higheft veneration for the virtue of chadity. She who, when unmarried, has been aecudomed to grant favours to dif¬ ferent men, will not find it eufy, if indeed poflible, to refid afterwards the allurements of variety. It is there¬ fore a wife iriditution, and agreeable to the will of Him who made us, to train up women fo as that they may look upon the lofs of their chadity as the mod disgrace¬ ful of all crimes : as that which firiks them in the order of fociety, and robs them of all their value. In this light virtuous women actually look upon the lofs of chadity. The importance of that virtue has been fu deeply impreffed upon their minds, and is fo clofely af- fociated with the principle of honour, that they cannot think but with abhorrence upon the very deed by which it is lod. He therefore who by fraud and falfehood perfuades the unfulpe&ing girl to deviate in one indance from the honour of the fex, weakens in a great degree her moral principle ; and if he reconcile her to a repe¬ tition ojc her crime, he dedroys that principle entirely^ as die has been taught to condder all other virtues as inferior to that of chadity. Hence it is that the hearts of proditutes are generally deeded againd the miferies of their fellow-creatures; that they lend their aid to the feducer itl his practices upon other girls; that they lie and fwear and deal without compunction ; and that too many *)f them hefitate not to commit murder if it can ferve any felfilh purpofe c>f their own. The lofs of virtue, though the greated that man or woman can fudain, is not the only injury which the feducer brings on the girl whom he deceives. She cannot at once reconcile heiftlf to proditution, or even to the lofs of charadler; and while a fenfe of Ihame re¬ mains in her mind, the mifery which die differs mud be exquifite. She knows that die has forfeited what in the female character is mod valued by both fexes; and fhe mud be under the perpetual dread of a difeovery. She cannot even confide in the honour of her feducer, vdio may repeal her fecret in a fit of drunkennefs, and thus rob her of her fame as well as of her virtue ; and while die is in this date of anxious uncertainty, the agony of her mind mud be infupportable. That it is ' fo in fact, the many indances of child murder by unmar¬ ried women of every rank, leave us no room to doubt. The affection of a mother to her new-born child is one of the mod tt&equivocal and ftrongeit inftin&s in human nature S E D. [ i Sedu&ion. nature (fee Instinct)-$ and nothing fhort of the ex- tremity of diftrefs could prompt any one fo far to op- pofe her nature as to embrue her hands in the blood of her imploring infant. Even this deed of horror feldom prevents a detec- iion of the mother’s frailty, which is indeed commonly difcovered, though no child has been the confequence of her intrigue. He who can feduce is bafe enough to betray ; and no woman can part with her honour, and retain any well-grounded hope that her amour lhall be kept fecret. The villain to whom fire furrendered will, glory in his victory, if it was with difficulty obtained ^ and if fhe furrendered at difcretion, her own behaviour will reveal her fecret. Her reputation is then irretrie¬ vably loft, and no future circumfpedHon will be of the fmalleft avail to recover it. She will'be ftmnned by the virtuous part of her own fex, and treated as a mere in- ftrument of pleafure by the other. In fuch circum- ftances (he cannot expedl to be married with advantage. She may perhaps be able to captivate the heart of a heedlefs youth, and prevail upon him to unite his fate to her’s before the delirium of his paffion (hall give him time for reflection •, the may be addrefled by a man who is a ftranger to her ftory, and married while he has no fufpicion of her fecret; or Ihe may be foljcited by one of a ftation inferior to her own, who, though acquaint¬ ed with every thing that has befallen her, can barter the delicacy of wedded love for lome pecuniary advantage j but from none of thefe marriages can ftre look for hap- pinefs. The delirium which prompted the firft will foon vanifh, and leave the hufband to the bitternefs of his own reflexions, which can hardly fail to produce cruelty to the wife. Of the fecret, to which, ip the fecond cafe, the lover was a ftranger, the hufband will foon make a difcovery, or at leaft find room for har¬ bouring ftrong fufpicions; and fufpicions of having been deceived in a point fo delicate have hitherto been uni¬ formly the parents of mifery. In the third cafe, the man married her merely for money, of which having got the poffeflion, he has no farther inducement to treat her with refpeX. Such are fome of the confequences of feduclion, even when, the perfon feduced has the good fortune to get afterwards a bufband ; but this is a for¬ tune which few in her circumftancesxan reafonably ex¬ pect. By far the greater part of thofe who have been defrauded of their virtue by the arts of the feducer fink deeper and deeper into guilt, till they become at laft common proftitutes. The public is then deprived of their fervice as wives and parents ; and inftead of con¬ tributing to the population of the ftate, and to the fum of domeftic felicity, thefe outcafts of fociety become fe- ducers in their turn, corrupting the morals of every young man whofe appetites they can inflame, and of every young woman whom they can entice to their own praXices. All this complication of evil is produced at firft by arts, which, if employed to deprive a man of his pro¬ perty, would fubjeX the ofl'ender to the execration of his fellow-fubjeXs, and to an ignominious death : but while the forger of a bill is purfued with relentlefs ri¬ gour by the minifters of juftice, and the fwindler load¬ ed with univerfal reproach, the man who by fraud and forgery has enticed an innocent girl to gratify his, de¬ fires at the expence of her virtue, and thus introduced fcer into a path which muft infallibly lead to. her own 5 ig ] S E- E ruin, as well as to repeated injuries to the public at SeduXioa. large, is not defpifed by his own fex, and is too often II, careffed even by the virtuous part of the other. Yet ee S* » the lofs of property may be ealily repaired j the lofs of honour is irreparable ! It is vain to plead in allevia¬ tion of this guilt, that women ftiould be on their guard againft the arts of the feducer. Moft unquellionably they fhould ; but arts have been ufed which hardly any degree of caution would have been fufficient to coun- teraX. It may as well be faid that the trader ftiould be on his guard againft the arts of the forger, and ac¬ cept of no bill without previoufly confulting him in whofe name it is written. Cafes, indeed, occur in trade, in which this caution would be impoflible $ but he muft be little acquainted with the workings’ of the human heart, who does not know that fituations like- wife occur in life, in which it is equally impoflible for a girl of virtue and tendernefs to refill the arts of the man who has completely gained her affeXions. The mentioning of this circumftance leads us to con- ftder another fpecies of feduXion, which, though not fo highly criminal as the former, is yet far removed from innocence ; we mean the pjraXice which is too prevalent among young men of fortune ef employing every art in their power to gain the hearts of heedlefs girls whom they refolve neither to marry nor to rob of their ho¬ nour. Should a man adhere to the latter part of this refolution, which is more than common fortitude can always promife for itfelf, the injury which he does to the objeX of his amufement is yet very great, as he raifes hopes of the moft fanguine kind merely to dilap- point them, and diverts her affeXions perhaps for ever from fuch men as, had they been fixed on one of them, might have rendered her completely happy. Hifap- pointments of this kind have fometimes been fatal to the unhappy girl •, and even when they have neither de¬ prived her of life, nor difordered her reafon, they have often kept her wholly from marriage, which, whatever it be to a man, is that from which every woman ex- peXs her chief happinefs. We cannot therefore con¬ clude this article more properly than with warning our female readers not to give up their Hearts haftily to men whofe ftation in life, is much, higher than their own 5 and we beg leave to affure every one of them, that the man who folicits the laft favour under the moft folemn promife of a fubfequent marriage, is a bafe feducer, who prefers a momentary gratification qf his own to her honour and happinefs through life, and has no intention to fulfil Ins promife. Or, if he Ihould by

w to ertain 3 moft vantage- spropor- n be- een the iving : ■ver and l: load. E r 659 ] S T E Mr Buat, in his examina- fometimes fo conftru&ed, the arches at the ends of the working beam being completed to a circle. It muft be unequally loaded that it may move. It is loaded, during the working ftroke, by the prtffure of the atmofphere on the pifton fide, and by the column of water to be raifed and the pump-gear 'on the pump fide.—During the returning ftroke it is loaded, on the pifton fide, by a fmall part of the atmofpheric preffure, and on the pump fide by the pump-gear adling as a counter weight. 1 he load during the working ftroke muft therefore confift of the column of water to be raifed and this counter weight. 1 he performance of the machine is to be meafured only by the quantity of water raifed in a given time to a given height. It varies, therefore, in the joint proportion of the weight of the column of water in the pumps, and the number of ftrokes made by the machine in a minute. Each ftroke confifts of two parts, which we have called the working and the returning ftroke. It does not, therefore, depend Amply on the velocity of the working ftroke and the quantity of water raifed by it. If this were all that is to be attended to, we know that the’ weight of the column of water ftrould be nearly |fths of the preffure of the atmofphere, this being the proportion which gives the maximum in the common pulley. But, the time of the returning ftroke is a neceffary part of the whole time elapfed, and therefore the velocity of the re¬ turning ftroke equally merits attention. This is regu¬ lated by the counter weight. The number of ftrokes per minute does not give an immediate proof of the goodnefs of the engine. A fmall load of water and a great counter weight will enfure this, becaufe thefe con¬ ditions will produce a brilk motion in both directions.— The proper adjuftment of the preffure of the atmofphere on the pifton, the column of water to be raifed, and the counter weight, is a problem of very great difficul¬ ty j and mathematicians have not turned much of their attention to the fubjeCt, although it is certainly the moft interefling queftion that practical mechanics affords them. Mr Boffut has folved it very ffiortly and fimply, upon Mr Bofiut's this fuppofition, that the working and returning ftroke lo^ut^on» ffiould be made in equal times. This, indeed, is gene¬ rally aimed at in the ereCtion of thefe machines, and they are not reckoned to be well arranged if it be otherwife. We doubt of the propriety of the maxim. Suppofing, however, this condition for the prefent, we may com¬ pute the loadings of the two ends of the beam as fol¬ lows. Let a be the length of the inner arm of the work¬ ing beam, or that by which the great pifton is fupported. Let b be the outer arm carrying the pump rods, and let W be a weight equivalent to all the load which is laid on the machine. Let c1 be the area of the pifton ; let H be the height of a column of water having c* for its bafe, and being equal in weight to the preffure exerted by the fleam on the under fide of the pifton ; and let h be the preffure of the atmofphere on the fame area, or the height of a column of water of equal weight. It is evident that both ftrokes will be performed in equal times, if h c* a—W b be equal to (^—H) c1 a-f-W The firft of thefe quantities is the energy of the machine during the working ftroke, and the fecond expreffes the fimilar energy during the returning ftroke. This equa- 2hc*a—He* a (2//—H) c* a 3r tion gives us W= • 4 O 2 2b 2b If we 32 founded on an errone- S T E [ we fuppofe the arms of the lever eefual and we ^1 h have W—c1— j that is, the whole weight of the outer 2- . end of the beam fliould be half the preffure of the air on the great pifton. This is nearly the ufual prabtice ; and the engineers exprefs it by faying, that the engine is loaded with feven or eight pounds on the fquare inch. This has been found to be nearly the moft advantageous load. This way of expreffing the matter would do well enough, if the maxim were not founded on erroneous ous maxim, noti0ns, which hinder us from feeing the date of the machine, and the circumftances on which its improve¬ ment depends. The pifton bears a preflure of 15 pounds, it is faid, on the fquare inch, if the vacuum below it be perfect •, but as this is far from being the cafe, we muft not load it above the power of its vacuum, which very little exceeds eight pounds. But this is very far from the truth. When the cylinder is tight, the vacuum is not more than -^th deficient, when the cylinder is cool¬ ed by the injedtion to the degree that is every day prac¬ ticable, and the pifton really bears during its defcent a preflure very nfar to 14 pounds on the inch. The load muft be diminifhed, not on account of the imperfedl va¬ cuum, but to give the machine a reafonable motion. We muft confider not only the moving force, but alfo the quantity of matter to be put in motion. This is fo great in the fteam-engine, that even if it were balanced, that is, if there were fufpended on the pifton arm a weight equal to the whole column of water and the counter weight, the full preflure of the atmofphere on the fteam pifton would not make it move twice as faft as it does. This equation by Mr Boflut is moreover eflentially faulty in another refpedl. The W in the firft member is not the fame-with the W in the fecond. In the firft it is the column of water to be raifed, together with the counter weight. In the fecond it is the counter weight only. Nor is the quantity H the fame in both cafes, as is moft evident. The proper equation for enfuring the equal duration of the two ftrokes may be had in the fol¬ lowing manner. Let it be determined by experiment what portion of the atmofpheric preflure is exerted on the great piflon during its defcent. This depends on the remaining elafticity of the fteam. Suppofe it T^ths: this we may exprefs by a a being =rT^-ths. Let it alfo be determined by experiment what portion of the atmofpheric preflure on the pifton remains unbalanced by the fteam below it during its afeent. Suppofe this -j%th, we may exprefs this by b h. Then let W be the weight of the column of water to be raifed, and c the counter weight. Then, if the arms of the beam are equal, we have the energy during the working ftroke —ah—W—c, and during the returning ftroke it is ~c—bh. Therefore <7—b h^za h—W—c; and c~ ——5 which, on the above fuppofition of 33 and laul- ty in an¬ other re- fperve ■ |rticular nfidera- a. falling through the air, and may be determined in the manner laid down in the article RESISTANCE of Fluids^ viz. by an exponential calculus. We tliall content our- felves here with faying, that the reiiftances in the pre- fent cafe are fo great that the motion would be to ail fenfe uniform before the piitons have defcended one- third of their itroke, even although there were no other 40 circumitance to affedt it. ie motion But this motion is aflfedled by a circumflance quite dded by unconne6ted with any thing yet coniidered, depending rediat on con(iitions not mechanical, and fo uncertain, that we Vrve, are not yet able to afcertain them with any precifion ; yet they are of the utmoft importance to the good per¬ formance and improvement of the engine, and therefore deferve a particular confideration. The counter weight has not only to pufh down the pump rods, but alfo to drag up the great pifton. This it cannot do unlefs the fleam be admitted into the cy¬ linder. If the fleam be no ftronger than common air, it cannot enter the cylinder except in confequence of the pifton’s being dragged up. If common air were admit¬ ted into the cylinder, fome force would be required to drag up the pifton, in the fame manner as it is required to draw up the pifton of a common fvringe j for the air would rufh through the fmall entry of the cylinder in the fame manner as through tire fmall nozzle of the fyringe. Some part of the atmofpheric preffure is em¬ ployed in driving in the air with fufficient velocity to fill the fyringe, and it is only with the remainder that the admitted air prelfes on the under furface of the fy¬ ringe. Therefore fome of the atmofpheric preflure on its upper furface is not balanced. This is felt by the hand which draws it up. The fame thing muft happen in the fleam engine, and fome part of the counter weight is expended in drawing up the fleam pifton. We could tell how much is thus expended if we knewr the denfty of the fleam ; for this would tell us the velocity with which its elafticity would caufe it to fill the cylinder. If we fuppofe it 12 times rarer than air, which it cer tainly is, and the pifton rifes to the top of the cylinder in two feconds, we can demonftrate that it will enter with a velocity not lefs than 1400 feet per fecond, where¬ as 500 feet is enough to make it maintain a denfity ^ths of that of fleam in equilibrio with the air. Hence it follows, that its elafticity will not be lefs than |gths of the elaflieity of the air, and therefore not more than T^th of counter weight will be expended in drawing up the fteam-pifton. But all this is on the fuppofition that there is an un¬ bounded fupply of fleam of undiminifhed elafticity. This is by no means the cafe. Immediately before opening the fleam-cock, the fleam was iftuing through the fafe- ty valve and all the crevices in the top of the boiler, and (in good engines) was about -j%-th ftronger or more elaftic than air. 'This had been gathering during fome- thing more than the defcent of the pifton, viz. in about three feconds. The pifton rifes to the top in about two feeonds ; therefore about twice and a half as much fleam as fills the dome of the boiler is now fhared between the boiler and cylinder. i he dome is commonly about fix times more capacious than the cylinder. If therefore no fleam is condenfed in the cylinder, the denfity of the fleam, when the pifton has reached the top, muft be a- bout r|ths of its former denfity, and (fill more elaftic than air. But as much fleam is condenfed by the cold cy- [ 663 ] S T E Steam - Engine. 41 Under, its elafticity mull be lefs than this. We cannot tell how much lefs, both becauie we do not know how much is thus condenled, and becaufe by this diminution of its preffure on the furface of the boiling water, it mult be more copioufly produced in the boiler; but an atten¬ tive obfe.vation of the engine will give us fume infor¬ mation. The moment the fleam cock is opened we have a ftrong puff of fleam through the (hitting valve. At this time, therefore, it is ftiil more elaltic than air ; but after this, the fnifting valve remains (hut during the whole rife of the piiton, and no fleam any longer iffues through the fatety-valve or crevices 5 nay, the whole dome of the boiler may be obierved to fink. Thefe fadls give abundant proof that the elafticity of The elafti- the fleam during the afcent of the pifton is greatly dbCIty of the miniihed, and therefore much of the counter weight is^;ean\CU expended in dragging up the fleam piiton in oppofition afcent of to the unbalanced part of the atmofpheric preffure. The the pifton motion ot the returning ftroke is therefore fo much de-§r.eatly cll_ ranged by this foreign and inappreciated circuinftance,minillied* that it would have been quite ufelefs to engage in the intricate exponential invefligation, and we mult fit down contented with a lefs perfedl adjuftment of the counter weight and weight of water.— Any perfon who attends to the motion of a fleam engine will perceive that the defcent of the pump-rods is fo far from being accelera¬ ted, that it is nearly uniform, and frequently it is fenfi- bly retarded towards the end. We learn by the way, that it is of the utmoft importance not only to have a quick produ&ion of fleam, but alfo a very capacious dome, or empty fpace above the water in the boiler. In engines where this fpace was but four or five times the capacity ot the cylinder, w7e have always obferved a very fenfible check given to the defcent of the pump-rods after having made half their ftroke. This obliges us to employ a greater counter weight, which diminifties the column of water, or retards the working ftroke j it alfo obliges us to employ a ftronger fteam, at the rifk of burfting the boiler, and increafes the expence of fuel. 42 It would be a moft defirable thing to get an exaift How to knowledge of the elafticity of the fteam in the cylinder jklI0'y .tlie and this is by no means difficult. Take a long glafs tube exaftly calibered, and clofe at the farther end. Putin the cy- a fmall drop of fome coloured fluid into it, fo as to ftand finder, at the middle nearly.—Let it be placed in a long box filled with water to keep it of a conftant temperature. Let the open end communicate with the cylinder, with a cock between. The moment the fteam-cock is open¬ ed, open the cock of this inftrument. The drop will be pufhed towards the clofe end of the tube, while the fteam in the cylinder is more elaftic than the air, and it will be drawn the other way while it is lefs elaftic, and, by a fcale properly adapted to it, the elafticity of the fteam corresponding to every pofition of the pifton may be difcovered. The fame thing may be done more ac¬ curately by a barometer properly conitrufted, fo as to prevent the ofcillations of the mercury. 43 It is equally neceffary to know the ftate of the cylin- Ncceflary der during the defcent of the fteam-pifton. We have hitherto fuppofed P to be the full preflure of the atmo- The fphere on the area of the pifton, fuppofing the vacuum cylinder below it to be complete. But the infpedtion of our(lUnn£ die table of elafticity (hows that this can never be the cafe,^lcent of becaufe the cylinder is always of a temperature far aboveLhe riltoai 32°. We have made many attempts to dflcover its tem¬ per a ture^ S T E [ 664. ] S T E Steam- perature. We have employed a thermometer in clofe con- Engine. ta(^. t]ie 0£ t}ie cylinder, which foon acquired a ' " ileady temperature: this was never lefs than 1450. We have kept1 a thermometer in the water which lies on the pifton: this never funk below 13 50. It is probable that the cylinder within may be cooled fomewhat lower ; but for this opinion we cannot give any very fatisfaftory reafon. Suppofe it cooled down to 1 20°} this will leave an elaf- ticity which would fupport three inches of mercury. ^ e cannot think, therefore, that the unbalanced preflure of the atmofphere exceeds that of 2*7 inches of mercury, which is about 13-yd pounds on a fquare inch, or io4 on a circular inch. And this is the value which we (hould employ in the equation P~L-}~y. 1 his queftion may be decided in the fame way as the other, by a barometer conne&ed with the infide of the cylinder. And thus we {ball learn the ftate of the moving forces in every moment of the performance, and the machine will then be as open to our examination as any water or horfe mill 5 and till this be done, or fomething equiva- •lent, we can only guefs at what the machine is a£hially performing, and we cannot tell in what particulars we can lend it a helping hand. We are informed that Meffrs Watt and Boulton have made this addition to fome of their engines j and we are perfuaded that, from the information which they have derived from it, they have been enabled to make the curious improvements from which they have acquired fo much reputation and 44 profit. '.’Quantity There is a circumftance of which we have as yet ta- ■te^tobe*'* ken no notice» V1Z' ^ie quality °f c°ld water inje£led. injedted! Here we confefs ourfelves unable to give any precife in- ftruftions. It is clear at firft fight that no more than is abfolutely neceffary ihould be injected. It muft ge¬ nerally be fupplied by the engine, and this expends part of its power. An excels is much more hurtful by cool¬ ing the cylinder and pifton too much, and therefore wafting fleam during the next rife of the pifton. But the determination of the proper quantity requires a knowledge, which we have not yet acquired, of the quantity of heat contained in the fleam in a latent form. As much water muft be injedfted as will abforb all this without rifing near to the boiling temperature. But it is of much more importance to know how far we may cool the cylinder with advantage } that is, when will the lofs of fleam, during the next rife of the piflon, compenfate for the diminution of its elafticity duting its prefent defcent ? Our table of elallicities fhows us, that by cooling the cylinder to 120°, we Hill leave an elafticity equal to one-tenth of the whole power of the engine $ if we cool it only to 140, we leave an elafticity of one-fifth ; if we cool it to a blood- heat, we leave an elafticity of one-twentieth. It is ex¬ tremely difficult to choofe among thefe varieties. Expe¬ rience, however, informs us, that the bell engines are thofe which ufe the fmalleft quantities of injeftion wa¬ ter. We know an exceedingly good engine having a cylinder of 30 inches and a fix feet ftroke, which works with fomething lefs than one-fifth of a cubic foot of wa¬ ter at each inje&ion} and we imagine that the quantity Ihould be nearly in the proportion of the capacity of the cylinder. Defaguliers obferved, that a very good en¬ gine, with a cylinder of 32 inches, worked with 300 inches of water at each inje&ion, which does not much exceed one-fixth of a cubic foot. Mr Watt’s obferva- tions, by means of the barometer, muft have given him Steam, much valuable information in this particular, and we Engine, hope that he will not always withhold them from the public. We have gone thus far in the examination, in order This exa. feemingly to afcertain the motion of the engine whenmination, loaded and balanced in any known manner, and in or- though m? der to difcover that proportion between the moving power and the load which will produce the greateft ti,e atter quantity of work. The refult has been very unfatis-tion toth- fadlory, becaufe the computation of the returning ftroke principal is acknowledged to be beyond our abilities. But it has given us the opportunity of directing the reader’s atten¬ tion to the leading circumftances in this inquiry. By knowing the internal ftate of the cylinder in machines of very different goodnefs, we learn the connection be¬ tween the ftate of the fteam and the performance of the machine ; and it is very poflible that the refult of a full examination may be, that in fituations where fuel is expenfive, it may be proper to employ a weak fteam which will expend lefs fuel, although lefs work is per¬ formed by it. We Ihall fee this confirmed in the clear- eft manner in fome particular employments of the new engines invented by Watt and Boulton. In the mean time, we fee that the equation which we gave from the celebrated Abbe Boffut, is in every re- fpeft erroneous even for the purpofe which he had in view. We alfo fee that the equation which we fubfti- tuted in its place, and which was intended for determi- ' h- ning that proportion between the counter-weight and the moving force, and the load which would render the working ftroke and returning ftroke of equal duration, is alfo erroneous, becaufe thefe two motions are extreme¬ ly different in kind, the one being nearly uniform, and the other nearly uniformly accelerated. This being fuppofed true, it {hould follow that the counter-weight {hould be reduced to one-half *, and we have found this to be very nearly true in fome good engines which we have examined. 46 We fnall add but one obfervation more on this head. An errore. The pra6lical engineers have almoft made it a maxim, that the two motions are of equal duration. Buttbetwomo_ only reafon which we have heard for the maxim, is, tions are of that it is awkward to fee an engine go otherwife. But equal dura- we doubt exceedingly the truth of this maxim ; and,'1011, without being able to give any accurate determination, -we think that the engine will do more work if the working ftroke be made {hnver than the returning ftroke. Suppofe the engine fo conftrufted that they are made in equal times 5 an addition to the counter-weight will accelerate the returning ftroke and retard the working ftroke. But as tire counter-weight is but fmall in pro¬ portion to the unbalanced portion of the atmofpheric preffure, which is the moving force of the machine, it is evident that this addition to the counter-weight muft bear a much greater proportion to the counter-weight than it does to the moving force, and muft therefore ac¬ celerate the returning ftroke much more than it retards the working ftroke, and the time of both ftrokes taken together muft be diminiflied by this addition and the performance -of the machine improved ; and this muft be the cafe as long as the machine is not extravagantly loaded. The beft machine which vse have feen, in re- fpefl of performance, raifes a column of water whofe weight is very nearly two-thirds of the preffure of the atmofphere S T E IlSteam- |:inginc. f 66 ahnofpliere on the pifton, making 11 ftrokes of fix feet each per minute, and the working ftroke was almoft twice as flow as the other. This engine had worked pumps of 12 inches, which were changed for pumps of 14 inches, all other things remaining the fame. In its former ftate it made from 12 and a half to 13 and a half ftrokes per minute, the working ftroke being con- fiderably flower than the returning ftroke. The load was increafed, by the change of the pumps, nearly in the proportion of three to four. This had retarded the working ftroke; but the performance was evidently in¬ creafed in the proportion of 3 X 13 to 4 X 11, or of 39 to 44. About '300 pounds were added to the counter¬ weight, which increafed the number of ftrokes to more than 12 per minute. No fenfible fcbange could be ob- ferved in the time of the working ftroke. The per¬ formance was therefore increafed in the proportion of 39 to 48. We have therefore no hefitation in faying, that the feemly equality of the two ftrokes is a facfifice to fancy. The engineer who obferves the working ftroke to be flow, fears that his engine may be thought feeble and unequal to its work *, a fimilar notion has long mifled him in the oonftruftion of water-mills, efpecially of overfhot mills 5 and even now he is fub- mitting with hefitation and fear to the daily correction of experience. It is needlefs to engage more deeply in fcientific cal¬ culations in a fubjeft where fo many of the data are fo very imperfeCtly underftood. We venture to recommend as a maxim of conftruClion (fuppofing always a large boiler and plentiful fupply of ^pure fteam Anmixed with air), that the load of work be 1 ,oufl([s ’not lefs than 10 pounds for every fquare inch of the pi- fti;v*ry fton, and the counter-weight fo proportioned that the f: reitich time of the returning ftroke may not exceed two-thirds e i6 pi- 0f tliat of the working ftroke. A ferious objection may be made to this maxim, and it deferves mature confide- ration. Such a load requires the utmoft care of the ma¬ chine, that no admiflion be given to the common air ; and it precludes the poffibility of its working, in cafe the growth of water, or deepening the pit, ftiould make a greater load abfolutely neceflary. Thefe confidera- tions muft be left to the prudence of the engineer. The maxim now recommended relates only to the belt aClual performance of the engine. lol Before quitting this machine, it will not be amifs to tq mting give fome eafy rules, fanClioned by fuccefsful praftice, tljiier- for computing its performance. Thefe will enable any attift, who can go through Ample calculations, to fuit the fize of his engine to the talk which it is to per¬ form. The circumftance on which the whole computation muft be founded is the quantity of water which muft be drawn in a minute, and the depth of the minej and the performance which may be expected from a good engine is at leaft 12 ftrokes per minute of fix feet each, working againft a column of water whofe weight is equal to half of the atmofpheric preflure on the fteam- pifton, or rather to 7.64 pounds on every fquare inch of its furface. It is moft convenient to eftimate the quantity of wa¬ ter in cubic feet, or its weight in pounds, recollefling load tvork ftld not kefs than IUs for hi ance of/e fttfi-en «ib 0 1 , . S T E that a cubic foot of water weighs 62^ pounds. The depth of the pit is ufually reckoned in fathoms of fix feet, and the diameter of the cylinder and pump is ufually reckoned in inches. Let £) be the quantity of water to be drawn per minute in cubical feet, and f the depth of the mine in fathoms $ let c be the diameter of the evlinder, and p that of the pump 5 and let us fuppofe the arms of the beam to be of equal length. I ft, To find the diameter of the pump, the area of the pifton in fquare feet isX °*^ —• The length 144 of the column drawn in one minute is 12 times 6 or 72 feet, and therefore its folid contents is ^ 72 X 0.78 .4 r • . 144 cubical feet, or 7?1 XO.3927 cubical feet. This muft be equal to Q 1 therefore px muft be ——— or nearly O o,39?7 X Hence this pra&ical rule : Multiply the cubic feet of water which muft be drawn in a minute by 2f, and extra# the fquare root of the produ# : this will be the diameter of the pump in inches. Thus fuppofe that 58 cubic feet muft be drawn every minute j 58 multiplied by 2\ gives 145, of which the fquare root is 12, which is the required diameter of the pump. 2. To find the proper diameter of the cylinder. The pifton is to be loaded with 7.64 pounds on every fquare inch. This is equivalent to fix pounds oh a cir¬ cular inch very nearly. The weight of a cylinder of water an inch in diameter and a fathom in height is 2-^ pounds, or nearly two pounds. Hence it follows that 6 c* muft: be made equal to 2/p* and that c1 is equal to . fp- or to Vol. XIX. Part II. 6 ' 3 Hence- the following rule : Multiply the fquare of the diameter of the pump pifton (found as above) by the fathoms of lift, and divide the produ# by 3 ; the fquare root of the quotient is the diameter of the cylin¬ der. Suppofe the pit to which the foregoing pump is to be applied is 24 fathoms deep; then -4 ^ 144 gives 1152, of which the fquare root is 34 inches very near- ly" This engine, conftru#ed with care, will certainly do the work. Whatever is the load of wctler prrtpofed for the en¬ gine, let 10 be the pounds on every circular inch of the fteam pifton, and make cxz=pt x —, and the fquare root will be the diameter of the fteam pifton in inches. To free the practical engineer as much as poflible from all trouble of calculation, we fubjoin the follow¬ ing TABLE of the Dimenjiwis and Power of the Steam Engine, drawn up. by Mr Beighton in 1717, and fully verified by practice fince that time. The meafure is in Englifh ale gallons of 282 cubic inches. 4P . Steam- Engine, S T E [ 666 ] S T E Steam- Engine. 49 Mr Beigh- ton’s table of the di- menlions and power of the fteam- engine. Diain. of pump. Inch. 8 7^ 6 5i 5 4t 4 Holds in one yard. Draws by a fix feet ftroke. Gail. I4-4 12.13 10.02 8.12 7.26 6.41 6.01 c.66 4.91 4-23 3.61 3-T3 2-51 2.02 1.6 Gall. Lb.' avoir, 28.8 24.26 20.04 16.24 M-52 12.82 12.02 II.32 9.82 8.46 7.2 6.2 5-° 4.04 3-2 Weighs in one yard. At 16 ftrokes per min. ‘Gall. 462 338 32O 239.8 232-3 205.2 192.3 l8l.I I57,r 135-3 H5-5 .99.2 80.3 64.6 51.2 Ditto in hogf- heads. (Id. Gal Ditto per hour Hd. Gal. 7.21 6.20 5-5 4-7 3-43 3.16 3-2 2-55 2.31 2.9 1.52 1.36 i-7 1.1 0.51 The depth to be drav^n in yards. l5 440. 369-33 304.48 247.7 221.15 1 Q t.22 x 8 2.13 i72-3° 149.40 128.54 110.1 94-3° 66.61 60.60 48.5! ’ ‘f . ^ r 181 I5i I3i 124 I 2 II jo! 10 9i 20 | 25 2Ii24 19I22 18 j20 i6|i8 >5^i7l 144 14 ‘154 13455 13 12 11 10 3° 264 25 2 20 '9 184 >71 164 154 '4 13 12 11 10 35 28 26 234 3°4 28 204 >9 i87 18 162 40 3 24j34l 2941314 254 23 2% 204 I9l 16^; '3 11 45 ! 5o 27 244 23 214 21 20 l9 18 16 *5 i34 12 11 28I 25 24 23 22 214 204 !9 !7 !54 14 *34 11 60 70 371 34’ 3J4 28 264 25 24l 231 22 20 *9 x7 154 M 12 40 37 34 3°4 284 25 22 20 i >9 164 >5 >34 80 90 43t 39i 36 33 31 29 28 27 25i 23 22 20 184 16 f4 38i 35 32i 3°i 294 284 27 24i 23 21 >94 >7 !5 Steam* Engine. The firft part of the table gives the fize of the pump fuited to the growth of water. The fecond gives the lize of the cylinder fuited to the load of water. If the depth is greater than any in this table, take its fourth part, and double the diameter of the cylinder. Thus if 1 co’hoglheads are to be drawn in an hour from the depth of 100 fathoms, the laft column of part firft gives for 149.40 a pump of feven inches bore. In a line ivitn this under the depth of 50 yards, which is one-fourth of 100’fathoms, we find 2o4, the double of which is 41 inches for the diameter of the cylinder. It is almoft impoflible to give a general rule for ftrokes of different lengths, &c. but any one who profeffes the ability to ere£t an Engine, ftiould furely know as much arithmetic as will accommodate tne rule now given to any length of ftroke. We venture to fay, that no ordinary engineer can tell a priori the number per minute which an engine will give. We took 12 ftrokes of fix feet each for a ftandard, which a careful engineer may eafily accom- plith, and which an employer has a right to expeft, the engine being loaded with water to half the preffure of the atmofphere : if the load be lefs, there is fome fault— an improper counter weight, or too little boiler, or leaks, &c. &c. Such is the ftate in which Newcomen’s fteam-engine ot had continued in ufe for 6d years, negleded by the phi- converting lofopher, although it is the moft curious objeft which its recipro- human ingenuity has yet offered to his contemplation, and abandoned to the efforts of the unlettered artift. Its ufe has been entirely confined to the raifing of water.. Mr Keane Fitzgerald indeed publilhed in the Philofophi- cal Tranfaftions a method of converting its reciprocating motion into a continued rotatory motion by employing the great beam to work a crank or a train of wheel-work. As the real a£tion of the machine is confined to its work¬ ing ftroke, to aefeomplith this, it became neceffary to connect xvith the crank or wheeled work a very large and heavy fly, which ftiould accumulate in itfelf the whole preffure of the machine during its time of adtion, and therefore continue in motion, and urge forward 5° Mr- Fitzge raid’s me¬ thod of eating mo¬ tion into a continued rotatory motion. the working machinery, while die fteam-engine was going through its inaaive returning ftroke. This will be the cafe, provided that the refiftance exerted by the tvorking machine during the whole period of the work¬ ing and returning ftroke of the fteam-engine, together with the friaion of both, does not exceed the whole preffure exerted by the fteam-engine during its work¬ ing ftroke ; and provided that the momentum of the fly, arifing from its great weight and velocity, be very great, fo that the refiftance of the work during one re¬ turning ftroke of the fteam-engine do not make any very fenfible diminution of the velocity of the fly. This is evidently poffible and eafy. The fly may be made of any magnitude ; and being exaaiy balanced round its axis, it will foon acquire any velocity confident with the motion of the fteam-engine. During the working ftroke of the engine it is uniformly accelerated, and by its ac¬ quired momentum it produces in the beam the movement of the returning ftroke -, but in doing this, its momen¬ tum is (hared with the inert matter of the fleam-engine, and confequently its velocity diminiftied, but not entire¬ ly taken away. The next working ftroke therefore, by prefling on it afrefh, increafes its remaining velo¬ city by a quantity nearly equal to the whole that it acquired during the firft ftroke. We fay nearly, but not quite equal, becaufe the time of the fecond working ftroke muft be fhorter than that of the firft, on account of the velocity already in the machine. In this manner the fly will be more and more accelerated every fuccet?d- ing ftroke, becaufe the preffure of the engine during the xvorking ftroke does more than reftore to the fly the momentum Avhich it loft in producing the returning movement of the fteam-engire. Noav fuppoje the working part of the machine to be added. I he acce¬ leration of the fly during each working ftroke of the fteam-engine AA'ill be lefs than it was before, becaufe the impelling preffure is noxv partly employed in driving the Avorking machine, and becaufe the fly Avill lofe more of its momentum during the returning ftroke of the fteam- engine, part of it being expended in driving the work- inti machine. It is evident, therefore, that a time avi ° come S T E Steam- come when the fucceffive augmentation of the fly’s velo- !Engine- cii;y willceafe j for, on the one hand, the continual acce- |'"n' leration diminifhes the time of the next working flroke, and therefore the time of adlion of the accelerating power. The acceleration mull diminilh in the fame proportion •, and on the other hand, the refillance of the working ma¬ chine generally, though not always, increafes with its velocity. The acceleration ceafes whenever the addi¬ tion made to the momentum of the fl\ duiing a work¬ ing llroke of the fteam-engine is juft equal to what it lofes by driving the machine, and by producing the re- ^ turning movement of the fleam engine. . n impor- This mud be acknowledged to be a very important int addi- addition to the engine, and though fufficiently obvious, it is ingenious, and requires conlidcrable {kill and ad- dreft to make it effe6live (b). The movement of the working machine, or mill of whatever kind, mull be in fome degree hobbling or un¬ equal. But this may be made quite infenlible, by ma¬ king the fly exceedingly large, and difpofing the great- eft part of its weight in the rim. Bv thefe means its momentum may be made fo great, that the whole force required for driving the mill and producing the return¬ ing movement of the engine may bear a very fmall pro¬ portion to it. The diminution of its velocity will then be very trifling. No .counter weight is neceffary here, becaufe the re¬ turning movement is produced by the inertia of the fly. A counter weight may, however, be employed, and ftiould be employed, viz. as much as will produce the returning movement of the fteam-engine. It will do this better than the fame force accumulated in the fly *, for this force mull be accumulated in the fly by the in¬ tervention of rubbing parts, by which fome of it is loft ; and it mull be afterwards returned to the engine with a fimilar lofs. But, for the fame reafon, it would be im¬ proper to make the counter weight alfo able to drive the mill during the returning ftroke. ’k feldotn By this contrivance Mr Fitzgerald hoped to render never the fteam-engine of moll extenfive ufe j and he, or others opted, aflbeiated with him, obtained a patent excluding all others from employing the fteam-engine for turning a crank. They alfo publifhed propofals for ere£ling mills of all kinds driven by fteam-engines, and Hated very fairly their powers and their advantages. But their pro¬ pofals do not feem to have acquired the confidence of the public ; for we do not know of any mill ever having been erefted under this patent. le great great obftacle to this extenfive ufe of the fteam- oenfe of engine is the prodigious expence of fuel. An engine i!l having a cylinder of four feet diameter, working night and day, confumes about 3400 chaldron (London) of good coals in a year. S T E ■ This circumftance limits the ufe of fteam-engines ex- Steam- ceedingly. To draw water from coal-pits, where they Engine. ^ can be flocked with unfaleable fmall coal, they are. of ^ univerfal employment : alio for valuable mines, for limits the fupplying a great and wealthy city with water, and a ufe of few other purpofes where a great expence can be bornt , hyam-etv- they are very proper engines; but in a thoufand cafes where their unlimited powers might be vaftly fervice- able, the enormous ex pence of fuel completely excludes them. We cannot doubt but that the attention of engi¬ neers was much diredled to every thing that could pro- mife a diminution of this expence. Every one had his particular noftrum for the conftruflion ot his furnace, and fome were undoubtedly more fuccefsful than others. But fctence^was not yet fufficiently advanced : It was not till Dr Black had made his beautiful difeovery of latent heat, that we could know the intimate relation between the heat expended in boiling off a quantity of water and the quantity of Hearn that is produced. Much about the time of this difeovery, viz. 1763, Mr James Watt, eftablilhed in Glafgow in the com¬ mercial line, was amufing himfelf with repairing a working model of the fteam-engine which belonged to the philofophical apparatus of the univerfity. Mr Watt was a perfon of a truly philofophical mind, eminently converfant in all branches of natural knowledge, and the pupil and intimate friend of Dr Black. In the courfe of the above-mentioned amufement many curious 55 fadls in the production and condenfation of fleam 0c-at£ curred to him ; and among others, that remarkable fad which is always appealed to by Dr Black as the proof contains an of the immenfe quantity of heat which is contained in immenfe a very minute quantity of water in the form of elaftic fufpended by double chains like the pi Hons of the en¬ gines for extinguilhlng fires •, and Mr Watt has accor¬ dingly done fo in fotne of his engines. But in his drawing from which this figure is copied, he has com¬ municated the force of the pifton to the beam by means of a toothed rack OO, Avhich engages or Avorks in thfe toothed fe&or ££ on the end of the beam. The rea- der will undetftand, without any farther explanation, hoAV the impulfe given to the pifton in either direction is thus tranfmitted to the beam without diminution. The fly XX, with its pinion Y, Avhich alfo Avorks in the toothed arch Q£>, may be fuppofed to be removed for the prefent, and will be confidered aftenvards. We {hall take the prefent opportunity of deferibing Mr Watt’s method of communicating the force of the fleam-engine to any machine of the rotatory kind. VV reprefents the rim and arms of a very large and heavy metalline fly. On its axis is the concentric toothed Avheel U. There is attached to the end of the great beam a ftrong and ft ill rod 1 I, to the loA'-er end of Avhich a toothed Avheel is firmly fixed by Iavo bolts, fo that it cannot turn round. This Avheel is of the fame fizo and in the fame vertical plane with the wheel U ; and an iron link or {trap (which cannot be feen here, beCaufe it is on the other fide of the two wheels) conne&s the centres of the two Avheels, fo that the one cannot quit the other. I he engine being in the pofition reprefented in the figure, fuppofe the fly to be turned once round by any external force in the di- re&ion of the darts. It is plain, that fince the toothed Avheels cannot quit each other, being kept together by Steam Engine . /'/.ATE DI. BEICtHTON’S steam engine WATT’S STEAM ENGINE. PLATE mil. FLA T E Df V. A’. AfUcktU ScJp1 S T E [ S»*am- the link, the inner half (that is, the half next the cylin- Engwe. far) of the wheel U will wTork on the inner half of the v wheel W, fo that at the end of the revolution of the .fly the wheel W mud have got to the top of the wheel U, and the outer end of the beam mud be raifed to its higheft pofition. The next revolution of the fly will bring the wheel W and the beam connefted with it to their firfl: pofitions*, and thus every two revolutions of the fly will make a complete period of the beam’s re¬ ciprocating movements. Now, inftead of fuppofmg the fly to drive the beam, let the beam drive the fly. The motions muft be perfeftly the fame, and the afcent or defcent of the pifton will produce one revolution of the %• .12. A fide view of this apparatus is given in fig. 12. marked by the fame letters of reference. This {hows the fituation of parts which were fore-fliortened in fig. ix. particularly the defcending branch C of the fleam- pipe, and the fituation and communications of the two pumps K and I. 8, 8 is the horizontal part of the fleam- pipe. 9 is a part of it whofe box is rcprefented by the dark circle of fig. n. D is the box of the fleam- clack; and the little circle at its corner reprefents the end of the axis which turns it, as will be defcrihed af¬ terwards. N is the place of the upper edu6iion valve. A part only of the upper eduftion-pipe G is reprefent- ed, the reft being cut off, becaufe it would have covered the defcending fleam-pipe CC. When continued dorvn, it comes between the eye and the box E of the lower fleam-valve, and the box F of the lower eduiffion-valve. Let us now trace the operation of this machine through all its fteps. Recurring to fig. n. let us fup- pofe that the lower part of the cylinder BB is exhauft- ed of all elaftic fluids; that the upper fleam-valve D and the lower eduftion-valve F are open, and that the lower fleam-valve E and upper eduftion-valve N are fliut. It is evident that the pifton muft be prefled toward the bot¬ tom of the cylinder, and muft pull down the end of the working beam by means of the toothed rack OO and feflor QQ, caufing the other end of the beam to urge forward the machinery with which it is connefted. When the pifton arrives at the bottom of the cylinder, the valves D and F are {hut by the plug frame, and E and N are opened. By this laft paflage the fleam gets into the eduftion-pipe, where it meets with the injeftion water, and is rapidly condenfed. The fleam from the boiler enters at the fame time by E, and preffing on the lower fide of the pifton, forces it upwards, and by means of the toothed rack OO and toothed feftor 0(^ forces up that end of the working beam, and caufes the other end to urge forward the machinery with which it is connefted: and in this manner the operation of the engine may be continued for ever. The injeftion water is continually running into the eduftion-pipe, becaufe condenfation is continually go¬ ing on, and therefore there is a continual atmofpheric preflure to produce a jet. The air which is difengaged from the water, or enters by leaks, is evacuated only during the rife of the pifton of the air-pump K. When this is very copious, it renders a very large air-pump neceflfary; and in fome fituations Mr Watt has been obliged to employ two air-pumps, one worked by each arm of the beam. This in every cafe expends a very confiderable portion of the power, for the air-pump is Vol. XIX. Part II. 673 ] S T E always working again!! the whole preffure of the atmo- fphere. It is evident that this form of the engine, by main¬ taining an almoft conftant and uninterrupted impulfion, is much fitter for driving any machinery of continued motion than any of the former engines, which were'in- aftive during half of their motion. It does not, how¬ ever, feem to have this fuperiority when employed to draw water: But it is equally fitted for this talk. Let the engine be loaded with twice as much as would be proper for it if a fingle-ftroke engine, and let a fly be connefted with it. Then it is plain that the power of the engine during the rife of the fteam-pifton will be ac¬ cumulated in the fly; and this, in conjunftion with the power of the engine during the defcent of the fteam-pi¬ fton, will be equal to the whole load of water. In fpeaking of the fteam and eduftion-valves, we faid that they were all puppet-valves. Mr Watt employed cocks, and alfo fliding-valves, fuch as the regulator or fteam-valves in the old engines. But he found them always lofe their tightnefs after a fhort time. This is not iurprifing, when we confider that they are always perfeftly dry, and almoft burning hot. He was there¬ fore obliged to change them all for puppet-clacks, which, when truly ground and nicely fitted in their motions at firft, are not found to go out of order by any length of time. Other engineers now univerfally ufe them in the old form of the fteam-engine, without the fame reafons, and merely by fervile and ignorant imita¬ tion. The rvay in which Mr Watt opens and fhuts thefekig. 1 valves is as follows. Fig. 13. reprefents a clack {with its feat and box. Suppofe it one of the eduftion-valves. HH is part of the pipe which introduces the fteam, and GG is the upper part of the pipe which communicates with the condenfer. At EE may be obferved a piece more faintly lhaded than the furrounding parts. This is the feat of the valve, and is a brafs or bell-metal ring- turned conical on the outfide, fo as to fit exaftly into a conical part of the pipe GG. Thefe two pieces are fitted by grinding; and the cone being of a long ta¬ per, the ring fticks firmly in it, efpecially after having- been there for fome time and united by ruft. The clack itfelf is a ftrong brafs plate D, turned conical on the edge, fo as to fit the conical or floping inner edge of the feat. Thefe are very nicely ground on each other with emery. This conical joining is much more obtufe than the outer fide of the ring; fotbat although the joint is air-tight, the two pieces do not ftick ftrongly together. The clack has a round tail DG, which is freely move- able up and down in the hole of a crofs piece FF. On the upper fide of the valve is a ftrong piece of metal DC firmly joined to it, one fide of which is formed into a toothed rack. A is the feftion of an iron axle which turns in holes in the oppofite fides of the valve-box, where it is nicely fitted by grinding, fo as to be air¬ tight. Collets of thick leather, well foaked in melted tallow and rofin, are ferewed on the outfide of thefe holes to prevent all ingrefs of air. One end of this axis pro- jefts a good way without the box, and carries a fpanner or handle, which is moved by the plug-frame. To this axis is fixed a ftrong piece of metal B, the edge of which is formed into an arch of a circle having the axis A in its centre, and is cut into teeth, which work in tho 4 Q. teeth Stcam^ Engine. S T E [ 674 ] S T E Steam- teeth of the rack DC. K is a cover which is fixed by Engine. fcrews to the top of the box HJJH, and may be taken oft' in order to get at the valve when it needs repairs. From this defcription it is eafy to fee that by turn¬ ing the handle which is on the axis A, the feftor B mmt lift up the valve by means of its toothed rack DC, till the upper end of the rack touch the knob or button K. Turning the handle in the oppofite dire Rrengt},. quires a vaft mafs of matter, not lefs indeed in an en-e,n the great gine with a cylinder of 54 inches than three tons and abeam, half, moving Avith the velocity of three feet in a fecond, which muft be communicated in about half a fecond. This mafs muft be brought into motion from a ftate of reft, muft again be brought to reft, again into motion, and again to reft, to complete the period of a ftroke. This confumes much potverj and Mr Watt has not been able to load an engine Avith more than 10 or 11 pounds on the inch and preferve a fufficient quantity ot motion, fo as to make 12 or 15 fix-feet ftrokes in a fecond. Many attempts haAre been made to lefl'en this mafs by ufing a light framed Avheel, or a light frame of carpen¬ try, in place of a folid beam, i hefe have generally been conilrufled by perfons ignorant of the true Icien- tific principles of carpentry, and have fared according¬ ly. Mr Watt has made fimil&r attempts 5 but found, that although at firft they Avere abundantly ftrong, yet after a ftiort time’s employment the ftraps and bolts Avitli which tbe Avooden parts Avere connefled cut their way into the Avood, and the framing greAv loofe in the joints, and, without giving any Avarning, Avent to pieces in an inftant. A folid maffy firnple beam, of fufficient Itrength, bends, and fenfibly complains (as the carpenters exprefs it), before it breaks. In all great engines, therefore, fuch only are employed, and in Imaller engines he fome- times ufes call-iron Avheelsor pulleys; nay, he frequent¬ ly ufes no beam or equivalent whatever, but employs the- fteam-pifton rod to drive the machinery to which the engine is applied. We prefume that our thinking readers will not be difpleaitd S T E [ 675 ] S T E Steam- difpleafed with this rational hiftory of the progrefs of Engine, engine in the hands of its ingenious and worthy in- “ ^ ventor. We owe it to the communications of a friend, lr Watt well acquainted with him, and able to judge of his .ociated merits. The public fee him always affociated with the iith Mr no lefs celebrated mechanic and philofopher Mr Boulton .mlton. 0p g0])0 near Birmingham (fee Soho). They have •lhared the royal patent from the beginning ; and the alliance is equally honourable to both. 'hence The advantages derived from the patent right fhow ieir pro- both the fuperiority of the engine and the liberal minds :s are de- of the proprietors. They erefl the engines at the ex- ved in e- pence of the employers, or give working drafts of all •ies^ ^ ^ie Prt3’ vv^b i^ftruftions, by which any refident en¬ gineer may execute the work. The employers feledt the belt engine of the ordinary kind in the kingdom, compare the quantities of fuel expended by each, and pay to Meffrs Watt and Boulton one-third of the an¬ nual favings for a certain term of years. By this the patentees are excited to do their utmoft to make the engine perfect; and the employer pays in proportion to the advantage he derives from it. It may not be here improper to Hate the actual per¬ formance of fome of thefe engines, as they have been ^ afcertained by experiment. I hat the An engine having a cylinder of 31 inches in diame- aial per- ter, and making 17 double ftrokes per minute, performs mance of^g Work of forty horfes working night and day (for feen which three relays or 1 20 horfes mutt* be kept), and burns 11,000 pounds of Staffordfhire coal per day. A cylinder of 19 inches, making 25 ftrokes of 4 feet each per minute, performs the work of 12 horfes working conftantly, and burns 3700 pounds of coals per day. A cylinder of 24 inches, making 22 ftrokes of 5 feet, burns 5500 pounds of coals, and is equivalent to the conftant work of 20 horfes. And the patentees think themfelves authorized by experience to fay in general, that thefe engines will raife more than 20,000 cubic feet of wrater 24 feet high for every hundred weight of good pit-coal confumed by them. In confequence of the great fuperiority of Mr Watt’s engines, both with refpeft to economy and manageable- nefs, they have become of moft extenfive ufe j and in every demand of manufacture on a great fcale they of- 77 fer us an indefatigable fervant, whofe ftrengtb has no ]-poled to bounds. The greateft mechanical projeft that ever en- 'kV*36 the attention of man was on the point of being dvrl™ executed by this machine. The States ox Holland were tr fteam- treating with Meffrs Watt and Boulton for draining the 'line. Haerlem Pvleer, and even reducing the Zuyder Zee: and we doubt not but that it will be accomplifhed when¬ ever that unhappy nation has fufficiently felt the diffe¬ rence between liberty and foreign tyranny. Indeed fuch unlimited powers are afforded by this engine, that the engineer now thinks that no talk can be propofed to him 7S which he cannot execute with profit to his employer. ’’I! at- No wonder then that all claffes of engineers have Jiptsto turned much of their attention to this engine •, and fee- ^15 Watt’ t^at 1't ^ias d°ne wiuch, that they try to make it yine in <^° Hill more. Numberlefs attempts have been made to yeralof improve Mr Watt’s engine •, and it would occupy a vo- T'e-ad- lume to give an account of thercq whilft that account ta£e > would do no more than indulge curiofity. Our engi¬ neers by profeflxon are in general miferably deficient in that accurate knowledge of mechanics and of chemiftry which is neceffary for underftanding this machine ; and Stearr- we have not heard of one in this kingdom who can be , 1 'H‘- i put on a par with the prefent patentees in this refpedft. Moft of the attempts ot engineers have been made with the humbler view of availing themlelves of Mr Watt’s difeoveries, fo as to conilruct a Iteam-engine fuperior to Newcomen’s, and yet of a form fufficiently different from Watt’s to keep it without the reach of his patent. This they have in general accompliftied by performing the condenfation in a place which, with a little ftretdb of fancy, not unfrequent in a court of law, may be called part of the cylinder. - ^ The fueeefs of moft of thefe attempts has interfered ard the fo little with the intereft of the patentees, that they iuc^e!j ot have not hindered the eredtion of many engines which the law would have deemed encroachments. We think the other, it our duty to give our opinion on this fubjedt without referve. Thefe are moft expenfive undertakings, and few employers are able to judge accurately of the me¬ rits of a projedt prefented to them by an ingenious ar- tift. They may lee the pradticability of the feheme, by having a general notion of the expanfion and cendenfa- tion of fteam, and they may be milled by the ingenuity apparent in the conftrudlion. The engineer himfelf is frequently the dupe of his own ingenuity ; and it is not always dilhonefty, but frequently ignorance, which makes him prefer his own invention or (as he thinks it) improvement. It is a moft delicate engine, and requires much knowledge to fee what does and what does not improve its performance. We have gone into the pre¬ ceding minute inveftigation of Mr Watt’s progrefs with the exprefs purpofe of making our readers fully mafters of its principles, and have more than once pointed out the real improvements, that they may be firmly fixed and always ready in the mind. By having recourfe to them, the reader may pronounce with confidence on the merits of any new conftrudlion, and will not be decei¬ ved by the puffs of an ignorant or diflioneft engineer. j0 We muff; except from this general criticifm a con-Exception ftruflion by Mr Jonathan Hornblower near Briftol, on^ntavour account of its Angularity, and the ingenuity and real^M^j {kill which appears in fome particulars of its conftruc- cr tion. The following ftiorl defeription will fufficiently explain its principle, and enable our readers to appre¬ ciate its merit. A and B (fig. 15.) reprefent two cylinders, of which Plate A is the largeft. A pifton moves in each, having their P'lv* rods C and D moving through collars at E and F. Defeription Thefe cylinders may be fupplied with fleam from the of his boiler by means of the fquare pipe G, which has a flanch fteam-en- to connedt it with the reft of the fteam-pipe. This S*ne' fquare part is reprefented as branching off to both cy¬ linders. c and d are two cocks, which have handles and tumblers as ufual, worked by the plug-beam W. On the fore-fide (that is, the fide next the eye) of the cylinders is reprefented another communicating pipe, whofe fedlion is alfo fquare or rectangular, having alfo two cocks a, b. The pipe Y, immediately under the cock Z>, eftablifhes a communication between the upper and lower parts of the fmall cylinder B, by opening the cock b. There is a fimilar pipe on the other fide of the cylinder A, immediately under the cock d. When the cocks c and a are open, and the cocks b and d are ftiut, the fteam from the boiler has free admiflion into the upper part of the cylinder B, and the fteaiu 4 Q, 2 from S T E [ 676 ] S T E Steam- from the lower part of B has free admifTion into the Engine. Upper part of A j but the upper part of each cylinder “'~'v has no communication with its lower part. From the bottom of the great cylinder proceeds the edu£Hon-pipe K, having a valve at its opening into the cylinder, which bends downwards, and is connefted with the conical condenfer L (c). The condenfer is iixed on a hollow box M, on which Hand the pumps N and O, for extradting the air and water j which laft runs along the trough T into a ciftern U, from which it is raifed by the pump V for recruiting the boiler, be¬ ing already nearly boiling hot. Immediately under the condenfer there is a fpigot-valve at S, over which is a fmall jet-pipe, reaching to the bend of the edu£tion- pipe. The whole of the condenfmg apparatus is con¬ tained in a ciltern R of cold wTater. A fmall pipe P comes from the fide of the condenfer, and terminates on the bottom of the trough T, and is there covered rvith a valve £>, which is kept tight by the water that is al- ways running over it. Laitly, the pump-rods X caufe the outer end of the beam to preponderate, fo that the quiefcent polition of the beam is that reprefented in the figure, the piftons being at the top of the cylinders. Suppofe all the cocks open, and fleam corning in ' eopioufly from the boiler, and no condenfation going on in Lj the fleam mull drive out all the air, and at laft follow it through the valve O. Now Hint the valves b and d, and open the valve S of the condenfer. The condenfation will immediately commence. There is now' no preffure on the under fide of the pillon of A, and it immediately defcends. The communication be¬ tween the lower part of B and the upper part of A being open, the fleam will go from B into the fpace left by the piilon of A. It mull therefore expand, and its elaflicity muft diminifh, and will no longer ba¬ lance the preffure of the fleam above the piflon of B. This piflon therefore, if not withheld by the beam, would defcend till it is in equilibrio, having fleam of equal denfity above and below it. But it cannot de¬ fcend fo far ; for the cylinder A is wider than B, and the arm of the beam at which its piflon hangs is longer than the arm which fupports the pillon of B: therefore when the piilon of B has defeended as far as the beam will permit it, the fleam betrveen the two piftons occu¬ pies a larger fpace than it did when both piftons were at the tops of their cylinders. Its denfity, therefore, and its elaflicity, diminilh as its bulk increafes. It is therefore not a balance ; for the fleam on the upper fide of B, and the pifton B, pulls at the beam with all the difference of thefe preffures. The flighteft view of the fubieft muft Ihow the reader, that as the piftons de- feend, the fleam that is between them will grow conti¬ nually rarer and lefs elaftic, and that both piftons will pull the beam downwards. Suppofe now that each has reached the bottom of its cylinder. Shut the cock a and the eduction-cock at the bottom of A, and open the cocks b and d. The communication being now ellablifhed between the upper and lower part of each cylinder, nothing hinders the counter weight from raifing the piflons to the top. Let them arrive there. The cylinder B is at this time fill- Steam, ed with fleam of the ordinary denfity, and the cylin- ^aginev der A with an equal abfolute quantity of fleam, but ex- ~'v' ' panded into a larger fpace. Shut the cocks b and d, and open the cock a, and the edu£tion-cock at the bottom of A \ the conden¬ fation will again operate, and the piftons defcend. And thus the operation may be repeated as long as fleam is fupplied 5 and one full of the cylinder B of ordinary fleam is expended during each working ftroke. Let us now examine the power of this engine. It is evident, that when both piflons are at the top of their relpeClive cylinders, the aCtive preffure (that is, the dif¬ ference of the preffure on its two fides) on the piflon of B is nothing, while that on the piflon of A is equal to the full preffure of the atmofphere on its area. This, multiplied by the length of the arm by which it is fup- ported, gives its mechanical energy. As the piftons defcend, the preffure on the pifton of B increafes, while that on the pifton of A diminilhes. When both are at the bottom, the preffure on the pifton of B is at its maximum, and that on the pifton of A at its mini¬ mum. Mr Hornblower faw that this muft be a beneficial employment of fleam, and preferable to the practice of condenfing it while its full elaflicity remained ; but he has not confidered it with the attention neceflary for af- certaining the advantage with precifion. Let a and b reprefent the areas of the piflons of A and B, and let « and /3 be the lengths of the arms by which they are fupported. It is evident, that when both piftons have arrived at the bottoms of their cylin¬ ders, the capacities of the cylinders are as and b(2. Let this be the ratio of rn to 1. Let g Ji 1 k (fig. 16.) and Imno be two cylinders of equal length, communi¬ cating with each other, and fitted with a piflon-rod p y, on which are fixed two piftons a a and bb, v. hofe areas are a* m and 1. Let the diftanee between the piflons be precifely equal to the height of each cylinder, which height we fhall call h. Let x be the fpace g b or bo, through which the piftons have defeended. Let the upper cylinder communicate with the boiler, and the lower cylinder with the condenfer or vacuum V. Any perfon in the lead converfant in mechanics and pneumatics will clearly fee that the flrain or preffure on the piflon-rod pq is precifely the fame with the united energies of the two pifton rods of Mr Hornblower’s en¬ gine, by which they tend to turn the working beam round its axis. The bafe of the upper cylinder being I, and its height h, its capacity or bulk is \h or h; and this ex- preffes the natural bulk of the fleam which formerly fil¬ led it, and is now expanded into the fpace bhlaatnib. The part bhib is plainly —h—x, and the part /a atn is •rzmx. The whole fpace, therefore, is mx-\-h—x, — —x, or h-\-m—ix. Therefore the denfity of , .n . h the fleam between the piflons is rrr—-—. h -}- m— 1 x Let p be the downward preffure of the fleam from J the (c) This, however, was flopped by Watt’s patent; and the condenfatien muff be performed Engine, or at leafl in the cylinder A, as in Newcomen’s o t? >)_ team- ngine. S T E the boiler on the upper pifton l h. prelTed up with a force This -P h -j-m — i x between the piftons. It is therefore, on the whole, prefled downward with a force ^ -0 [ 677 ] s T E pitton is alfo exprefles the accumulated preflure in Hornblower’s en¬ gine. We can now compute the accumulated preflure very :^X (.+L4|). by the fleam )• eafdy. It is evidently Steam- Engine, —-y—— 8a /i-j-m—1 x The lower piflon a a, having a vacuum below it, is pref- fed downwards with a force —p —, There- —1 x fore the whole preflure on the piflon rod dotvmvards if ?n h h \ ( 18 ^ ( 1 + = p ( ' n-\-m—1 x h-\~m—1 x' \ h 1 + h-\- — I h \ ^=—J, —p-\~ m—I x/ p h m~ p h k -|-7/7—-1 x A? This then is the momentary preflure on the piflon rod corresponding to its defeent x from its highefl pofi- tion. When the piflons are in their higheft pofition, this preffure is equal to m p. When they are in their lotveft pofition, it is —p Here therefore is an m acceffion of popfer. In the beginning the preflure is greater than on a Angle pifton in the proportion of m to I ; and at the end of the flroke, where the preflure is weakeft, it is flill much greater than the preflure on a fingle piflon. Thus, if m be 4, the preflure at the be- ginning of the flroke is 4/*, and at the end it is-/?, al- . . ^4 jnoft double, and in all intermediate pofitions it is great¬ er. It is worth while to obtain the fum total of all the accumulated preflures, that we may compare it with the conftant preflure on a fingle pifton. We may do this by confidering the momentary pref- T) Ji fure p^ , as equal to the ordinate GF, H/>», or M c, of a curve ¥ b c (fig. 10.), which has for its axis the line GM equal to h the height of our cy¬ linder, p h m—1 p h Call this and ?j—p: ordinate y. p h We have y — p -\- Now it is plain that is the ordinate of an equilateral hyperbola, —l~x 771 I of which p h is the power or re<51angle of the ordinate and abfeifs, and of which the abfeifs reckoned from the ©entre is \-x. Therefore make GE =r /?, and m—1 GM draw DEA parallel to MG, and make EA= h ~ . The curve F £ is an equilateral hyperbola having A for its centre and AH for its aflymptote. Draw the other aflymptote AB, and its ordinate FB. Since the power of the hyperbola is ~p //, mGEDM (for GE—/?, and GMzr^) ; and fince all the inferi- bed reflangles, fuch as AEEB, are equal to p h, it fol lows that AEFB is equal to GEDM, and that the area ABF c HA is equal to the area GF c MG, which The intelligent reader cannot but obferve that this is The accu* precifely the fame with the accumulated preflure of amuj£tec* quantity of fleam admitted in the beginning, and ftop-ji'^, ped in Mr Watt’s method, when the pifton has defeen-wjt'a that ded through the mih part of the cylinder. In con-of Mr fidering Mr Flornblower’s engine, the thing was pre-^yatt’s ctl fented in fo different a form that we did not perceiveSine* the analogy at tirft, and we were furprifed at the refult. We could not help even regretting it, becaufe it had the appearance of a new principle and an improvement ; and we doubt not but that it appeared fo to the in¬ genious author 5 for we have had fuch proofs of his liberality of mind as permit us not to fuppofe that he faw it from the beginning, and availed bimfelf of the difficulty of tracing the analogy. And as the thing may miflead others in the fame way, rve have done a fervice to the public by fliowing that tiffs engine, fo coftly and fo difficult in its conftru&ion, is no way fu- perior in power to Mr Watt’s Ample method of flop¬ ping the fleam. It is even inferior, becaufe there muft be a condenfation in the communicating paffages. We may add, that if the condenfation is performed in the cylinder A, which it muft be unlefs with the permif- fion of Watt and Boulton, the engine cannot be much fuperior to a common engine •, for much of the fleam from below B will be condenfed between the piflons by the coldnefs of the cylinder A 5 and this diminiffies the downward preffure on A more than it increafes the downward preflure on B. We learn however that, by confining the condenfation to a fmall pari of the cylinder A, Mr Hornblower has eroded engines clear of Mr Watt’s patent, which are confiderably fuperior to New¬ comen’s : fo has Mr Symington. We faid that there was much ingenuity and real fkill Still, kow~ obfervable in many particulars of this engine. The ever> the difpofition and connexion of the cylinders, and theen^ne-(^ whole condennng apparatus, are contrived with peculiar (JeT,uity neatnefs. The cocks are very ingenious j they are and (kill, compofed of two flat circular plales ground very true to each other, and one of them turns round on a pin through their centres; each is pierced with three fec- toral apertures, exa£lly correfponding with each other, and occupying a little lefs than one-half of their fur- faces. By turning the moveable plate fo that the aper¬ tures coincide, a large paffage is opened for the fleam j and by turning it fo that the folid of the one covers the aperture of the other, the cock is fhut. Such regu¬ lators are now very common in the caft iron ftoves for warming rooms. Mr Hornblower’s contrivance for making the collars for the pifton rods air-tight is alfo uncommonly inge¬ nious. This collar is in fadft two, at a fmall diflance from each other. A fmall pipe, branching off from the main fleam-pipe, communicates with the fpaee between the collars. This fleam, being a little ftronger than the preffure of the atmofphere, effeftually hinders the air from penetrating by the upper collar ; and though a little fleam ffiould get through the lower collar into the cylinder A, it can do no barm. We fee many cafes in which this pretty contrivance may be of fignrd fervice. But S T E [6 Eat it is in the framing of the great working beam that Mr Hornblovver’s feientific knowledge is moft con- Ipicuous j and we have no hefitation in affirming that it The great- is ftronger than a beam of the common form, and con- eft im- taining twenty times its quantity of timber. There is provement ]jarc}iy a part 0f expo fed to a tranfverfe ftrain, if we 1'11C except the ftrain of the pump V on the ftrutt by which ming of the work¬ ing' beam. 85 . The reci¬ procating fuccefsful. Steata. kngifie, hteam- Kitchen. it is worked. Every piece is either puftied or pulled in the direftion of its length. We only fear that the bolts which conneft the upper beam with the two iron bars under its ends will work loofe in their holes, and tear out the wood which lies between them. We would propofe to fubftitute an iron bar for the whole of this upper beam. This working beam highly deferves the attention of all carpenters and engineers. We have that opinion of Mr Hornblower’s knowledge and talents, that we are confident that he .will fee the fairnefs of our examination of his engine, and wre truft to his candour for an excufe for our critic! fm. The reciprocating motion of the fteam-engine has always been confidered as a great defedft j for though it motion of pjg now obviated by connecting it with a fly, yet, un- the fteam- jeps jt p. an enoine of double ftroke, this fly mull be an defedl ftill enormous mats or matter moving with great velocity. tobereme-Any accident happening to it would produce dreadful died. effefts : A part of the rim detaching itfelf would have the force of a bomb, and no building could withftand it. Many attempts have been made to produce a circular motion at once by the fteam. It has been made to blow on the vanes of a wheel of various forms. Eut the rarity of fteam is fuch, that even if none is condenfed by the cold of the vanes, the impulfe is exceedingly $5 feeble, and the expence of fteam, fo as to produce any Mr Watt’s ferviceable impulfe, is enormous. Mr Watt, among attempts to bls firft fpeculations on the fteam engine, made fome circular * attempts of this kind. One in particular was uncom¬ motion by inonly ingenious. It confifted of a drum turning air- fteam un- tight within another, with cavities fo difpofed that there was a conftant and great preflure urging it in one direc¬ tion. But no packing of the common kind could pre- ferve it air-tight with fufficient mobility. He fucceeded by immerfing it in mercury, or in an amalgam which remained fluid in the heat of boiling water •, but the continual trituration foon calcined the fluid and rendered it ufelefs. He then tried Parent’s or Dr Barker’s mill, inclofing tbe arms in a metal drum, which was immer- fed in cold wTater. The fteam ruffied rapidly along the pipe which was the axis, and it was hoped that a great reaftion would have been exerted at the ends of the arms j but it was almoft nothing. The reafon feems to be, that the greateft part of the fteam was condenfed in the cold arms. It was then tried in a drum kept boiling hot 5 but the impulfe was now very fmall in comparifon with the expence of fteam. This muft be the cafe. Mr Watt has deferibed in his fpecification to the pa¬ tent office fome contrivances for producing a circular motion by the immediate aftion of the fteam. Some of thefe produce alternate motions, and are perfeftly analogous to his double-ftroke engine. Others produce a continued motion. But he has not given fuch a de- feription of his valves for this purpofe as can enable an engineer to conftruift: one of them. From any guefs that we can form, we think the machine very imperfe£l j and we do not find that Mr Watt has ever ere&ed a 78 ] ST E continuous circular engine. He has doubtlefs found all his attempts inferior to the reciprocating engine with a fly. A very crude fcheme of this kind may be feen in the Tranfactions of the Royal Society of Dublin 1787. But although our attempts have hitherto failed, we hope 87 that the cafe is not yet defperate ; we fee different prin-^dil the ciples which have not yet been employed. cafe is not We (hall conclude our account of this noble engine with obferving, that Mr Watt’s form fuggefts the con-rent prin- ftruftion of an excellent air-pump. A large veffel may ciples may be made to communicate with a boiler at one fide, and ^ employ. with the pump receiver on the other, and alfo with a*' gg condenfer. Suppofe this veffel of ten times the capa- Mr Watt’ city of the receiver ; fill it with fteam from the boiler, engine %. and drive out the air from it; then open its communi-Se^s ff6 cation with the receiver and the condenfer. This will™r,f'rri’c' r , . r „ . .. tion 01 an rarely the air or the receiver ten times, nepeating'tbe exceuent operation will rarefy it 100 times ; the third operation air-pump, will rarefy it 1000 times j the fourth 10,coo times, &c. All this may be done in half a minute. STEAM-KitcJicn. Ever fince Dr Papin contrived his digefter (about the year 1690), fchemes have been pro- pofed for dreffing vilHuals by the fteam of boiling water. A philofophical club ufed to dine at Saltern’s coffee- houfe, Chelfea, about 40 years ago, and had their vic¬ tuals dreffed by hanging them in the boiler of the fteam- engine which raifes water for the fupply of Picadilly and its neighbourhood. They were completely dreffed, and both expeditioufly and with high flavour. A patent was obtained for an apparatus for this pur¬ pofe by a tin-man in London ; we think of the name of Tate. They were afterwards made on a much more effe&ive plan by Mr Gregory, an ingenious tradefman in Edinburgh, and are coming into very general ufe. It is well known to the philofopher that tire fteam of boiling water contains a prodigious quantity of heat, which it retains in a latent ftate ready to be faithfully accounted for, and communicated to any colder body. Every cook knows the great fealding power of fteam, and is difpofed to think that it is much hotter than boiling water. This, however, is a miftake j for it will raife the thermometer no higher than the water from which it comes. But we can affure the cook, that if he make the fteam from the fpout of a tea-kettle pafs through a great body of cold water, it will be conden¬ fed or changed into water j and when one pound of wa¬ ter has in this manner been boiled off, it will have heated the mafs of cold water as much as if we had thrown into it feven or eight hundred pounds of boiling hot water. If, therefore, a boiler be properly fitted up in a fur¬ nace, and if the fteam of the water boiling in it be con¬ veyed by a pipe into a pan containing victuals to be dreffed, every thing can be cooked that requires no higher degree of heat than that of boiling water : And this will be done without any rilk of fcorching, or any kind of overheating, which frequently fpoils our dilhes, and proceeds from the burning heat of air coming to thofe parts of the pot or pan which is not filled with li¬ quor, and is covered only with a film, which quickly burns and taints tbe whole difti. Nor will the cook be fcorched by the great heat of the open fire that is ne- ceffary for dreffing at once a number of difties, nor have Ids perfon and clothes foiled by the fmoke and foot un¬ avoidable in the cooking on an open fire. Indeed the whole $ T E i:Steam- ,'itchcn whole procefs is fo neat, fo manageable, To open to in- _ fpeftion, and fo cleanly, that it need neither fatigue nor olfend the delicacy of the niceft lady. We had great doubts, when we firit heard of this as a general mode of cookery, as to its economy ; we had none as to its efficacy. We thought that the fteam, and confequently the fuel expended, muft be vaftly great¬ er than by the immediate ufe of an open fire j but we have feen a large tavern dinner expeditioufly dreffed in this manner, feetningly with much lefs fuel than in the common method. L he following fimple narration of fafts will ffiow the fuperiority. In a paper manufa&ory in this neighbourhood, the vats containing the pulp into which the frames are dipped are about fix feet diameter, and contain above 200 gallons. This is brought to a proper heat by means of a fmall cockle or furnace in the middle of the liquor. This is heated by putting in about one hundred weight of coals about eight o’clock in the evening, and continuing this till four next morn¬ ing, renewing the fuel as it burns away. This method was lately changed for a fteam heater. A furnace, ha¬ ving a boiler of five or fix feet diameter and three feet deep, is heated about one o’clock in the morning with two hundred weight of coals, and the water kept in brilk ebullition. Pipes go off from this boiler to fix vats, fome of which are at 90 feet diftance. It is con¬ veyed into a flat box or veffel in the midft of the pulp, where it condenfes, imparting its heat to the fides of the box, and thus heats the furrounding pulp. Thefe fix vats are as completely heated in three hours, expending about three hundred weight of coals, as they were for¬ merly in eight hours, expending near eighteen hundred weight of coals. Mr Gregory, the inventor of this fteam-beater, has obtained (in company with Mr Scott, plumber, Edinburgh) a patent for the invention ; and we are perfuaded that it will come into very general ufe for many fimilar purpofes. The dyers, hatmakers, and many other manufaflurers, have occafion for large vats kept in a continual heat 5 and there feems no wav fo ef¬ fectual. Indeed when we refleCl ferioufly on the fubjeCt, we fee that this method has immenfe advantages confidered merely as a mode of applying heat. The fteam may be applied to the vefiel containing the victuals in every part of its furface : it may even be made to enter the veffel, and apply itfelf immediately to the piece of meat that is to be dreffed, and this without any rifle of fcorch- ing or overdoing.—And it will give out about -%-§-§ of the heat which it contains, and will do this only if it be wanted •, fo that no heat whatever is wafted except what is required for heating the apparatus. Experience fhows that this is a mere trifle in comparifon of what was fup- pofed neceffary. But with an open fire w'e only apply the flame and hot air to the bottom and part of the fides of our boiling veffels : and this application is hurried in the extreme •, for to make a great heat, we muft have a great fire, which requires a prodigious and moft ra¬ pid current of air. This air touches our pans but for a moment, imparts to them but a fmall portion of its heat ; and we are perfuaded that three-fourths of the heat is carried up the chimney, and efcapes in pure waftc, while another great portion beams out into the kitchen to the great annoyance of the fcorched cook. Vv e think, therefore, that a page or two of this work [ 679 ] s T E will not be thrown away in the defeription of a contri¬ vance by which a faving may be made to the enter¬ tainer, and the providing the pleafures of his table prove a lefs fatiguing talk to this valuable corps of prac¬ tical chemifts. Let A (fig. I.) reprefent a kitchen-boiler, either pro¬ perly fitted up in a furnace, with its proper fire-place, alh-pit, and flue, or fet on a tripod on the open fire, or built up in the general fire-place. The fteam-pipe BC rifes from the cover of this boiler, and then is led away with a gentle afeent in any convenient diredlion. C re- prefents the feftion of this conducing fteam-pipe. Branches are taken off from the fide at proper diftances. One of thefe is reprefented at CDE, furniffied with a cock D, and having a taper nozzle E, fitted by grind¬ ing into a conical piece F, which communicates with an upright pipe GH, which is foldered to the fide of the ftewing veffel PQRS, communicating with it by the ffiort pipe I. The veffel is fitted with a cover OT, ha¬ ving a ftaple handle V. The piece of meat M is laid on a tin-plate grate KL, pierced with holes like a cul¬ lender, and Handing on three Ihort feet n n n. "I he fteam from the boiler comes in by the pipe I, and is condenfed by the meat and by the fides of the veffel, communicating to them all its heat. What is not fo condenfed efcapes between the veffel and its co¬ ver. The condenfed water lies on the bottom of the veffel, mixed with a very fmall quantity of gravy and fatty matter from the victuals. Frequently, inftead of a cover, another ftew-veffel with a cullender bottom is fet on this one, the bottom of the one fitting the mouth of the other : and it is obferved, that when this is done, the diflr in the under veffel is more expeditioufly and better dreffed, and the upper difli is more flowly, but as completely, ftewed. I his defeription of one ftewing veffel may ferve to give a notion of the whole ; only we muft obferve, that when broths, foups, and diflies with made fauces or con¬ taining liquids, are to, be dreffed, they muft be put into a fmaller veffel, which is fet into the veffel PQRS, and is fupported on three fliort feet, fo that there may be a fpace all round it of about an inch or three ■ quarters of an inch. It is obferved, that difties of this kind are not fo expeditioufly cooked as on an open fire, but as completely in the end, only requiring to be turned up now and then to mix the ingredients j becaufe as the liquids in the inner veffel can never come into ebullition, unlefs the fteam from the boiler be made of a dangerous heat, and every thing be clofe confined, there cannot be any of that tumbling motion that we obferve in 3 boiling pot. The performance of this apparatus is far beyond any expe&ation we had formed of it. In one which we ex¬ amined, fix pans were ftewing together by means of a boiler ic£ inches in diameter, Handing on a brilk open fire. It boiled very brilkly, and the fteam puffed fre¬ quently through the chinks between the ftew-pans and their covers. In one of them was a piece of meat con- fiderably above 30 pounds weight. This required a- bove four hours ftewing, and was then very thoroughly and equally cooked ; the outfide be ing no more done than the heart, and it was near two pounds heavier than when put in, and greatly fwelled. In the mean time* federal diffies had been dreffed in the other pans. As far. Steam- Kitchen. Plate DV. fig. 1. Steam- Kitchen. Fig. S T E [ 680 ] far as we could judge, this cooking did not confume ( one-third part of the fuel which an open fire would have required for the fame effeft. When we confider this apparatus with a little more knowledge of the mode of operation of fire than tails to the thare of the cooks (we fpeak with deference), and confider the very injudicious manner in which the fteam is applied, we think that it may be improved io as to furpafs any thing that the cook can have a notion When the fteam enters the ftew-pan, it is conderifed on the meat and on the veffel ", but we do not want it to be condenfed on the veffel. And the furface of the veffel is much greater than that of the meat, and conti¬ nues much colder $ for the meat grows hot, and conti¬ nues fo, while the veffel, made of metal, which is a very perfeft conductor of heat, is continually robbed of its heat by the air of the kitchen, and carried off by it. If the meat touch the fide of the pan in any part, no fteam can be applied to that part of the meat, while it is continually imparting heat to the air by the inter¬ medium of the veffel. Nay, the meat can hardly be dreffed unlefs there be a current of fteam through it •, and wre think this confirmed by what is obferved above, that when another ftew-pan is fet over the firft, and thus gives occafion to a current of fteam through its cullen¬ der bottom to be condenfed by its fides and contents, the lower difh is more expeditioufly dreffed. We ima¬ gine, therefore, that not lefs than half of the fteam is wafted on the fides of the different flew-pans. Our firft attention is therefore called to this circumftance, and v’e with to apply the fteam more-economically and effedtu- ally. We would therefore conftruft the fteam-kitchen m the following manner : We would make a wooden cheft (which wre (hall call the Stew-chest) ABCD (fig. 2.). 'Ihis ftiould be made of deal, in very narrow Hips, not exceeding an inch, that it may not {brink This ftiould be lined with very thin copper, lead, or even ftrong tinfoil. This will prevent it from becoming a conductor, of heat by foaking with fteam. For further fecurity it might be fet in another cheft, with a fpace of an inch or two all round, and this fpace filled with a compofition of pow¬ dered charcoal and clay, .this fliould be made by firft making a mixture of fine potter’s clay and water about as thick as poor cream : then as much powdered char¬ coal muft be beat up with this as can be made to ftick together. When this is rammed in and dry, it may be hot enough on one fide to melt glafs, and will not dif- colour white paper on the other. This cheft muft have a cover LMNO, alfo of wood, having holes in it to receive the ftew-pans P, Q, R. Between each pan is a wooden partition, covered on both fides with milled lead or tinfoil. The whole top muft be covered with very fpongy leather or felt, and made very flat. Each ftew-pan muft have a bearing or {boulder all round it, by which it is fupported, refting on the felt, and lying fo true and clofe that no fteam can efcape. Some of the pans ftrould be fimple, like the pan F, for drefling broths and other liquid difhes. Others ftiould belike E and G, having in the bottom a pretty wide hole FI, K, which has a pipe in its upper fide, rifing about an inch or an inch and half into the ftew-pan. The meat is laid on a cullender plate, as in S T E the common way *, only there muft be no holes in the cullender immediately above the pipe.—Thefe ftew- pans muft be fitted with covers, or they may have others fitted to their mouths, for warming fauces or other dilh- es, or ftewing greens, and many other fubordinate pur- pofes for which they may be fitted. The main-pipe from the boiler muft have branches, (each furnifhed with a cock), which admit the fteam into thefe divifions. At its firft entry fome will be con¬ denfed on the bottom and fides j but we imagine that thefe will in two minutes be heated fo as to condenfe no more, or alraoft nothing, The fteam will alfo quickly condenfe on the ftew-pan, and in half a minute make it boiling hot, fo that it will condenfe no more ; all the reft will now apply itfelf to the meat and to the cover. It may perhaps be adviiable to allow the cover to con¬ denfe fteam, and even to wafte it. Ihis may be pro¬ moted by laying on it flannel foaked in water. Our view in this is to create a demand for fteam, and thus produce a current through the ftew-pan, which will be applied in its paffage to the victuals. But we are not certain of the neceflity of this, bteam is not like com¬ mon air of the fame temperature, which would glide along the furfaces of bodies, and impart to them a imall portion of its heat, and eicape with the reft, d-o pro¬ duce this effea there muft be a current for air hot enough to melt lead, will not boil water, it it be kept ftagnant round the veffel. But fteam imparts the whole of its latent heat to any body colder than boiling water, and goes no farther till this body be made boiling hot. It is a moft faithful carrier of heat, and will deliver its whole charge to any body that can take it. 1 herefore, although there were no partitions in the ftew-cheft, and the fteam were admitted at the end next the boiler, if the pan at the farther end be colder than the reft, it will all go thither ; and will, in ftiort, communicate to every thing impartially according to the demand. If any per- fon has not the confidence in the fteam which we ex- prefs, he may ftill be certain that there muft be a pro¬ digious faving of heat by confining the whole in the ftew-cheft ; and he may make the pans with entire bot¬ toms, and admit the fteam into them in the common wray, by pipes which come through the fides of the cheft and then go into the pan. There will be none loft by condenfation on the fides of the cheft } and the pans will foon be heated up to the boiling temperature ; and hardly any of their heat will be wafted, becaufe the air in the cheft will be ftagnant. The chief reafon for re¬ commending our method is the much greater cafe with which the ftew-pans can be ftiifted and cleaned. H here will be little difference in the performance. Nay, even the common fteam-kitchen may be piodi- gioufly improved by merely wrapping each pan in three or four folds of coarfe dry flannel, or making flannel bags of three or four folds fitted to their fhape, which can be put on or removed in a minute. It will alfo greatly conduce to the good performance to "wrap the main fteam pipe in the fame manner in flannel. We faid that this main-pipe is conduced from the boiler with a gentle afcent. The intention of this is, that the water produced by the unavoidable conden a- tion of the fteam may run back into the boiler. . But the rapid motion of the fteam generally fweeps ft up hill, and it runs into the branch-pipes and defcends into the ftew-pans. Perhaps it would be as well to give the r mant* Steam. Kitchen. WA-r/iiba/d scu/jrt STEAM KITCHEN PLATE DV HO O M S imarED nr S T E AM. T E Steam- main-pipe a declivity the other way, and allow all the Kitchen. water to collect in a hot well at the farther end, by _ ‘ means of a defcending pipe, having a loaded valve at the end. This may be fo contrived as to be clofe by the fire, tvhere it would be fo warm that it would not check the boiling if again poured into the boiler. But the utmofl attention muft be paid to cleanlinefs in the whole of this paffage, becaufe this water is boiled again, and its fleam pafles through the heart of every difh. This circumflance forbids us to return into the boiler what is condenfed in the flew-pans. This would mix the taftes and flavours of every dilh, and be very difa- greeable. All this muff remain in the bottom of each ftevv-pan ; for which reafon we put in the pipe riling up in the middle of the bottom. It might indeed be al¬ lowed to fall down into the ftew-cheft, and to be eol- iefled in a common receptacle, while the fat would float at top, and the clear gravy be obtained below, perhaps- fit for many fauces. The completed: method for getting rid of this con¬ denfed fleam would be to have a fmall pipe running along the under fide of the main conductor, and com¬ municating with it at different places, in a manner fimi- lar to the air difcharger on the mains of water-pipes. In the paper manufactory mentioned above, each fleam- box has a pipe in its bottom, with a float-cock, by which the water is difcharged ; and the main pipe being of great diameter, and laid with a proper acclivity, the ■water runs back into the boiler. But thefe precautions are of little moment in a fleam- kitchen even for a great table ; and for the general ufe of private families, would hurt the apparatus, by mak¬ ing it complex and of nice management. For a fmall family, the whole apparatus may be fet on a table four feet long and two broad, which may be placed on call¬ ers, fo as to be wheeled out of the way when not in ufe. If the main conductor be made of wood, or pro¬ perly cafed in flannel, it will condenfe fo little fleam that the cooking table may Hand in the remoteft corner of the kitchen without fenfibly impairing its perform¬ ance •, and if the boiler be properly fet up in a fmall furnace, and the flue made fo that the flame may be ap¬ plied to a great part of its furface, we are perfuaded that three-fourths of the fuel ufed in common cookery will be faved. Its only inconvenience feems to be the indifpenfable neceflity of the moft anxious cleanlinefs in the whole apparatus. The moft trifling negled in this will deftroy a whole dinner. We had almofl forgotten to obferve, that the boiler muft be furniihed with a funnel for fupplying it with water. This fhould pafs through the top, and its pipe reach near to the bottom. It will be proper to have a 'cock on this funnel. There fhould alfobe another pipe in the top of the boiler, having a valve on the top. If this be loaded with a pound on every fquare inch, and 'the fire fo regulated that fleam may be obferved to puff fometimes from this valve, we may be certain that it is pafling through our difhes with fuflicient rapidity 5 and if we fhut the cock on the funnel, and load the valve a little more, we fliall caufe the fleam to blow at the co¬ vers of the flew-pans. If one of thefe be made very tight, and have a hole alfo furnifhed with a loaded valve, this pan becomes a digefter, and will diffolve bones, and do many things which are impra&icable in the ordinary cookery. Vol. XIX. Part II. S T E STEAM applied to Heating Rooms. Steam has been Steam, fuccefsfully applied as a fubtlitute for open fires in heat- v ing manufactories, and promifes to be highly beneficial, not only in point of economy in faving fuel, but alfo in leffening the danger of accidental fire. The following mode of heating a cotton mill by fleam was propofed and pradlifed in 1799 by Mr Niel Snodgrafs of Paifley. We lhall give an account of it in his own words *. * Phil. “ Fig. 1. prefents a view of an inner gable, which is Mag. xxvii. at one extremity of the preparation and fpinning rooms of the mill. On the other fide of this gable there is a fpace of 17 feet, enclofed by an outer gable, and con- fig. r. taining the water-wheel, the flair cafe, and fmall rooms for the accommodation of the work. In this fpace the furnace and boiler are placed on the ground. The boiler cannot be fliovvn here, as it lies behind the gable exhi¬ bited ; nor is it of any confequence, as there is nothing peculiar in it. It may be of any convenient form. The feeding apparatus, &c. are in every refpecl the fame as in the boiler of a common fleam-engine. A circular copper boiler, two feet diameter by two feet deep, con¬ taining 30 gallons of water, with a large copper head as a refer voir for the fleam, was found to anfwer in the prefent inflance. The fleam is conveyed from the boiler through the gable, by the copper pipe B, into the tin pipe, C, C. From C it paffes into the centres of the per¬ pendicular pipes E, E, £, by the fmall bent copper tubes D, D, D. The pipes E, E, E, are con-nedted under the garret floor by the tubes F, F, for the more eafy circu¬ lation of the fleam. The middle pipe, E, is carried through the garret floor, and communicates with a lying pipe, 36 feet in length (the end of which is feen at G)j for heating the garret. At the further extremity of the pipe G, there is a valve falling inwards to prevent a va¬ cuum being formed on the cooling of the apparatus; the confequence of which would be the crufhing of the pipes by the preffure of the atmofphere. Similar valves K, K, are placed near the top of the perpendicular pipes, E, E ; and from the middle one E, the fmall pipe paffes through the roof, and is furnifhed with a valve at I, opening outwards, to fuffer the air to efcape while the pipes are filling with fleam, or the fleam itfelf to efcape when the charge is too high. “ The water condenfed in the perpendicular pipe* E, E, E, trickles down their fules into the three fun¬ nels L, L, L, the necks of which may .either pafs through or round the pipe C, into the copper tube M, M, which alfo receives the water condenfed in C, C, by means of the fhort tubes N, N. The pipe C, C, is itfelf fo much inclined as to caufe the water to run along it to the tubes N, N, and the pipe G in the garret has an inclination of 18 inches in its length, to bring the water condenfed in it back to the middle pipe E. The tube M, M, carries back the water through the gable to the boiler, which ftands five feet lower than this tube. It is material to return the water to the boiler, as, be¬ ing nearly at a boiling heat, a confiderable expence of fuel is thereby faved. “ The large pipes are ten inches in diameter, and are made of the fecond kind of tinned iron plates. The di- menfions of the fmaller tubes may be feen bv their com¬ parative fize in the engraving, and perhaps they might be varied without inconvenience. “ The apparatus eredled as here deferibed, has been found fufficiently flrong, and has required no material 4 ft repairs [ 681 ] S T E [ 68 Steam, repairs fince tlie fir ft alterations were made, 'i he lead- ii—v ing object in the inftance under confideration being to fave fuel, in order to derive as much heat as poflible from a given quantity of fuel, the due from the fur¬ nace, which heats the boiler, is conveyed into common ftone pipes placed in the gable. Thefe are eroded fo as to prevent any danger of fire, in the manner ftunvn in the engraving, fig. 2. The fteam with this auxiliary communicates a heat of about 7°° tnill, the rooms of which are 50 feet long, 32y feet wide, and 8| feet high, except the lower ftory and garret ; the former of which is 11, and the latter feven feet high. The rooms warmed in this manner are much more wholefome and agreeable than thofe heated by the bell conftrudted ftoves, being perfectly free from vapour or contaminated air. “ The application of the principle to buildings already conftruded, it is prefumed, will be fufficiently obvious from the foregoing details. In new manufadories, where the mode of heating may be made a part of the original plan, a more convenient apparatus may be introduced, •jog. i. This will be beft explained by a defeription of fig. 2. which gives a fedion of a cotton-mill conftruded fo as to apply the ftcam apparatus to a new building. “The furnace fur the boiler is drown at« (fig. 2). The flue of the furnace conveys the fmoke into the caft iron ftove pipes, 1, 2, 3, 4. Thefe pipes are placed in a fpace in the gable, entirely inclofed with brick, except at the {mall apertures, 5, 6, 7, 8. A current of air is admit¬ ted below at 9, and thrown into the rooms by thofe opening*, after being heated by contad with the pipes. This part of the plan is adopted with a view to prevent, as much a* poffible, any of the heat, produced by the fuel ufed, from being thrown away. It may be omitted where any danger of fire is apprehended from it, and the fmoke may be carried off in any way that is confi- elered abfolutely fecure. So far, however, as appears from experience., there feems to be little or no dan¬ ger of fire from a ftove of this conftrudion. The greateft inconvenience of a common ftove is, that the cockle or metal furnace is liable to crack from the intenfity of the heist. By the continuity of the metal from the fire¬ place, an intenfe heat is alfo conduded along the pipes, which expofes them to the fame accident. Here the fmoke being previoufly conveyed through a brick flue, can never communicate to the pipes a degree of heat fufficient to crack them. In like manner the pipes, hav¬ ing no communication with the rooms but by the fmall apertures, cannot come in contad with any combuftible fubftance ; and from being furrounded with air, which is conftantly changing, can impart only a very moderate degree of heat to the walls. The iron fupporters of the pipes may be imbedded in fome-fubftance which is a bad eondudor of heat, as furnace allies and lime, &c. The emiflion of heated air into the rooms may be regulated by valves. As the pipes are not expofed to cracking, there is no rilk of their throwing fmoke or vapour into the rooms. “ The boiler b, b, is fix feet long, three and a half broad, and three feet deep. As there is nothing pecu¬ liar in the feeding apparatus, it is omitted. The boiler may be placed in any convenient fituation. Where a fleam engine is ufed for other purpefes, the fteam may be taken from its boiler. 'The pipe c, c, conveys the fleam from the boiler to the fir ft perpendicular pipe 2 1 S T E d, d, d, d. There is an expanding joint at , The pipes are funk in the beams about an inch, and are made fait to them by the iron ftraps (],q. Thofe in the lower ftory reft on the ftones s, s, s, s, and are made tight at the junftion with fluffing. The pipe in each ftory fup- ports the one in the ftory above by a fluffed joint as ftrown at r. The pipes in the lower ftory are feven inches in diameter 5 thofe in the higher fix inches j thofe in the other two are of intermediate diameters. The thicknefs of the metal is three-eighths of an inch. The lower pipes are made larger than the upper, in order to expofe a greater heated lurface in the lower rooms, be- caufe the fteam being thrown from above into all the pipes, except the firft, would otherwife become incapable of imparting an equal heat as it defeends. T here is no neceffity for valves opening inwards in this apparatus, the pipes being llrong enough to refill the preffure of the atmofphere. “ The cotton mill is 60 feet long, 33 wide, and four ftones high, the upper being a garret llory. In the en¬ graving, five parts out nine in the length of the building are only fhown. ’Ihe apparatus will heat the rooms to 83° in the coldeft feafon. It is evident that, by increafing the fize, or the number of the pipes, and the fupply of fteam, any degree of heat up to 212° may be eafily produced. It may even be carried beyond that point by an apparatus ilrong enough to comprefs the fleam : this, however, can feldom be wanted. At firft it was objcCled to this conftruClion, that the expanfion of the pipes, when heated, might damage the building : but experience has proved, that the expanfion occafion- ed by the heat of fteam is quite infenfible.n Steam has alfo been advantageoufly employed in dry¬ ing muffin goods, when the ftate of the weather inter*- rupts this procefs out of doors. This application of fteam, we underftand, was the invention of an ingenious me¬ chanic in Paifley, who never derived the fmalleft benefit from the difeovery. It was adopted immediately by fome bleachers in the neighbourhood, and has now come into very general ufe. The fteam is introduced into cylin¬ ders of tin plate, and the goods to be dried are wrapped round the cylinders which communicate to them a heat equal at leaft to the temperature of boiling water, and in this way the procefs of drying is expeditioufly acconv- plifhed. STEATITES, or Soap earth, a. fpecies of mineral belonging S T E [ 633 ] S T E Steatites beloagmg to the magaefian genus. See Mineralogy 11 Index. Steel-yatj STEATOMA, a kind of cncyfted tumor, confiding of a matter like fuet or lard, foft, without pain, and without difcolouring the ikin. STEEL, iron united with carbone, from which it pouefies properties diltinct from thofe of iron, and which render it of fuperior value. From its higher degree of hardnefs, it admits a finer poliih and affiimes a brighter colour. When tempered, it pofleffes a higher degree of elaflieity, and is alfo more fonorous. It is more weak¬ ly attracted by the loadftone, it receives more flowly the magnetic power, but it preferves it longer. When ex- pofed to a moid air, it does not contrail rult fo eafily as iron. See Iron, Chemistry Index. Steel-Bow Tenants. See Tenure. STEEL-2ard, is one of the moll ancient prefents which fcience has made to fociety j and though long in defuetude in this country, is in moll nations of the world the only inftrument for afcertaining the weight of bodies. What is trantlaled balance in the Penta¬ teuch, is in fa61 ileelyard, being the word uied by the Arabs to this day for their inllrument, which is a Heel- yard. It is in common ufe in all the Afiatic nations. It was the Jhitera of the Greeks and Romans, and feems to have been more confided in by them than the ba¬ lance ; for which reafon it was ufed by the goldfmiths, while the balance was the inllrument of the people.— Non aurijicis Jlatera fed populari trutina examinare. Cic. de Orat. 23S. The Ileelyard is a lever of unequal arms, and, in its moll perfect form, is conitracted mucli like a common balance. It hangs in ihcers E (fig. 1.) reiting on the nail C, and the fcale L for holding the goods hangs by a nail D on the fiiort arm BC. The counter weight I* hangs by a ring of tempered Heel, made (harp in the infide, that it may bear by an edge on the long arm CA of the Ileelyard. The under edge of the centre nail C, and the upper edge of the nail D, are in the ftraight line formed by the upper edge of the long arm. Thus the three points of fufpenfion are in one llraight line. The needle or index of the lle.elyard is perpen¬ dicular to the line of the arms, and plays between the theers. The tliort arm may be made fo maffive, that, together with the fcale, it will balance the long arm un¬ loaded. When no goods are in the fcale, and the coun¬ ter weight with its hook are removed, the ileelyard ac¬ quires a horizontal pofition, in confequence of its centre of gravity being below the axis of fufpenfion. The rules for its accurate conftrudion are the fame as for a com¬ mon balance. The inllrument indicates different weights in the fol¬ lowing manner : The ditlance CD of the two nails is Confidered as an unit, and the long arm is divided into a number of parts equal to it; and thefe are fubdivided as low as is thought proper 5 or in general, the long arm is made a fcale of equal parts, commencing at the edge of the nail C 3 and the fhort arm contains tome de¬ termined number of thofe equal parts. Suppofe, then, that a weight A of 10 pounds is put into the fcale L. The counterpoife P mull be of fuch a weight, that, ivhen hanging at the divifion 10, it thall balance this weight A. Now' let any unknown weight W be put into the fcale. Slide the hook of the counterpoife along the long arm till it balances this weight* Stip¬ ulate DVI. 1. pofe it then hanging at the divifion 38. We Conclude Steel.yarJ* that there is 38 pounds in the fcale. This we do on ^ the authority of the fundamental property of the lever, that forces a£ting on it, and balancing each other, are in the inverfe proportion of the difiances from the ful¬ crum to their lines of diredlion. Whatever weight the counterpoife is, it is to A as CD to 10, and it is to the weight W as CD to 38 } therefore A is to the weight W as 10 to 38, and W is 38 pounds : and thus the weight in the feale will always be indicated by the di¬ vifion at which it is balanced by the counterpoife. Our well-informed readers know that this fundamen¬ tal property of the lever was difeovered by the renowned Archimedes, or at leatt firll demonflrated by him 3 and that his demontlration, betides the defe6l of being ap¬ plicable only to commenfurable lengths of the arms, has been thought by metaphyficians of the firtl note to pro¬ ceed on a potlulate which feems equally to need a de¬ montlration. It has accordingly employed the utmoft refinement of the firtt mathematicians of Europe to fur- niih a demontlration free from objection. Mr D’Alem¬ bert has given two, remarkable for their ingenuity and fubtlety 3 Foncenex has done the fame 3 and Profeffor Hamilton of Trinity college, Dublin, has given one which is thought the leatt exceptionable-. But critics have even objected to this, as depending- on a pullulate which Ihould have been demonitrated. The following demontlration by Mr Vince, we think unexceptionable, and of fuch fimplicily that it is atton- ntl Tranf idling that it has not occurred to any perfon who thinks 1794. on the fubjeft. Let AE (fig. 2-.) be a mathematical lever, or inflex- pjg. ^ ible ftraight line, reiting on the prop A, and fupported at D by a force ading upwards. Let two equal Weights b and d be hung on at B and D, equiditlant from A and E. Preffures are now exerted at A and E 3 and bt caufe every circumllance of weight and diltance is the fame, the preffure at E, anting from the adlion of the weight b on the point B, rnuft be the fame with the preffure at A, anting from the action of the weight d on the point D 3 and the preffure at E, occafioned by the weight r/, mutt be the fame with the preffure at A, occafioned by the weight b. This mutt be the cafe wherever the weights are hung, ^provided that the ditlance AB and DE are equal. Moreover, the fum of the preffures at A and E is unqueftionably equal to the fum of the weights, beeaufe the weights are fupported folely at A and E. Let the two weights be hung on at C the mid¬ dle point 3 the preffure at E is dill the fame. Therefore, in general, the preffure excited at the point E, by two equal weights hanging at any points B and D, is the fame as if they were hung on at the middle point between them 3 but the preffure excited at E is a jutt meafure of the effort or energy of the weights £ arid d to urge the lever round the point A. It h, at lead, a meafure of the oppofite force which muil be applied at E to fudam or balance this preffure. A very fadidious metaphyfi- cian may dill fay, that the demontliation is limited to a point E, wbofe didance from A is twice AC, or =r AB-f AD. But it extends to any other point, on the authority of a pullulate which cannot be refuted, viz. that in whatever proportion the preffure at E is augmented or diminifhed, the preffure at this other point mull augment or dimimdt in the fame proportion. This being proved, the general theorem may be dem^ndr - 4 R ^ ted S T E Sfeel-yard. ted in all proportions of diftance, in the manner of Ar- —v ' chimedes, at once the moft fimple, perfpicuous, and elegant of all. We cannot help obferving, that all this difficulty (and it is a real one to the philofopher who aims at rendering mechanics a demonftrative fcience) has arifen from an improper fearch after fimplicity. Had Archi¬ medes taken a lever as it really exifts in nature, and Confidered it as material, confiding of atoms united by cohefion •, and had he traced the intermediate preffures by whofe means the two external weights are put in op- pofition to each other, or rather to the fupport given to the fulcrum ; all difficulty would have vaniffied. (See what is faid on this fubje£t in the article STRENGTH of Timber, &c.). The quantity of goods which may be weighed by this inftrument depends on the weight of the counter- poife, and on the diftance CD from the fulcrum at which the goods are fufpended. A double counter- poife hanging at the fame divifion will balance or indi¬ cate a double quantity of goods hanging at D •, and any counterpoife will balance and indicate a double quantity of goods, if the diftance CD be reduced to one half. And it fometimes occurs that fteelyards are fo conftrudled that they have two or more points of fiifpenfion D, to which the fcale may occafionally be attached. It is evident, that in this cafe the value or indication of the divifions of the long arm will be different, according to the point from which the fcale is fufpended. The fame divifion which would indicate 20 pounds when CD is three inches, will indicate 30 pounds when it is two inches.. As it would expofe to chance of miftakes, and be otherwife troublefome to make this reduction, it is ufual to make as many divi¬ ded fcales on the long arm as there are points of fufpen- fkm D on the ffiort arm : and each fcale having its own numbers, all trouble and all chance of miftake is avoided. But the range of this inftrument is not altogether at the pleafure of the maker. Befides the inability of a flender beam to carry a great load, the divifions of the fcale anfwering to pounds or half-pounds become very minute when the diftance CD is very ftiort; and the balance becomes lefs delicate, that is, lefs fenfibly affeiff- ed by fmall differences of weight. This is becaufe in filch cafes the thicknefs which it is neceffary to give the edges of the nails does then bear a fenfible propor¬ tion to the diftance CD between them 5 fo that when the balance inclines to one fide, that arm is fenfibly fhortened, and therefore the energy of the_prepondera¬ ting weight is leffened. We have hitherto fuppofed the fteelyard to be in equilibrio when not loaded. But this is not neceffary, nor is it ufual in thofe which are commonly made. The long arm commonly preponderates confiderably. This makes no difference, except in the beginning of the fcale. The preponderancy of the long arm is equi¬ valent to fome goods already in the fcale, fuppofe four pounds. Therefore when there are really 10 pounds in the fcale, the counterpoife will balance it when hang¬ ing at the divifion 6. This divifion is therefore rec¬ koned 10, and the reft of the divifions are numbered ac¬ cordingly. A fcientific examination of the fteelyard will con¬ vince us that it is inferior to the balance of equal arms S T E in point of fenfibility : But it is extremely compendi- Steel-yard, ous and convenient 5 and when accurately made and at- -'v— tentively ufed, it is abundantly exa£t for moft commer¬ cial purpofes. We have feen one at Leipzig which has been in ufe fince the year 1718, which is very fenfible to a difference of one pound, when loaded with nearly three tons on the fhort arm ; and we faw a waggon- loaded with more than two tons weighed by it in about fix minutes. The fteelyard in common ufe in the different coun¬ tries of Europe is of a eonftru£tion ftill fimpler than what Ave have defcribed. It confifts of a batten of hard wood, having a heavy lump A (fig. 3.) at one end, and Rg. j> a fwivel-hook B at the other. The goods to be weighed are fufpended on the hook, and the whole is carried in a loop of whip-cord C, in which it is Aid backward and forward, till the goods are balanced by the weight of the other end. The weight of the goods is eftimated by the place of the loop on a fcale of divifions in harmonic progreffion. They are marked (we prefume) by trial with known weights. The chief ufe that is now made of the fteelyard in thefe kingdoms is for the weighing of loaded waggons and carts. For this it is extremely convenient, and more than fufficiently exaft for the purpofe in view. We ftiall deferibe one or two of the moft remarkable j and we (hall begin with that at Leipzig already men¬ tioned. This fteelyard is reprefented in fig. 4. as run out, Fig. 4. and juft about to be hooked for lifting up the load. The fteelyard itfelf is OPO, and is about 12 feet long. The ffiort arm has two points of fufpenfion c and b ; and the ftirrup which carries the chains for holding the load is made with a double hook, inftead of a double eye, that it may be eafily removed from the one pin to the other. For this purpofe the two hooks are con- nedled above an hafp or ftaple, which goes over the arm of the fteelyard like an arch. This is reprefented in the little figure above the fteelyard. The fufpenfion is ffiifted when the fteelyard is run in under cover, by hooking to this ftaple the running block of a fmall tackle which hangs in the door through which the fteelyard is run but and in. This operation is eafy, but neceffary, becaufe the ftirrup, chains, and the ftage on which the load is placed, weigh fome hundreds. The outer pin £ is 14 inches, and the inner one c is feven inches, diftant from the great nail which refts in the fheers. The other arm is about loi feet long, formed with an obtufe edge above. On the inclined plane on each fide of the ridge is drawn the fcale of weights adapted to the inner pin c. The fcales corre- fponding to the outer pin b are drawn on the upright fides. The counferpoife Hides along this arm, hanging from a faddle-piece made of brafs, that it may not con- traft ruft. The motion is made eafy by means of rollers. This is neceffary, becaufe tire counterpoife is greatly above a hundred weight. This faddle-piece has like two laps on each fide, on which are engraved vernier fcales, which divide their refpeflive fcales on the arm to quarters of a pound. Above the faddle is an arch, from the fummit of which hangs a little plummet, which ffiows the equilibrium of the fteelyard to the weigher, becaufe the fheers are four feet out of the houfe, and he cannot fee their coincidence Avith the needle oi the fteelyard, Laftly, near the end of the long arm [ 63+ ] 3 ar& Steelyard Fig. 4-. PLATh: DVT. S T E [68 ,iteel-yard. are two pins d and e, for fufpending occafionally two ■— ' eke weights for continuing the fc^le. Thefe are kept hanging on adjoining hooks, ready to be lifted on by a little tackle, which is alfo hooked immediately above the pins d and e. The fcales of weights are laid down on the arm as follows. Let the eke-weights appropriated to the pins d and e be called D and E, and call the counterpoife C. Although the ftirrup with its chains and ftage weigh feme hundreds, yet the length and fize of the arm OP gives it a preponderancy of 300 pounds. Here, then, the fcale of weights muft commence. The counterpoife weighs about 125 pounds. Therefore, 1. When the load hangs by the pin £,14 inches from the centre, the ditfance from one hundred to another on the fcale is about 11 inches, and the firft fcale (on the fide of the arm) reaches from 300 to 1200. In order to repeat or continue this, the eke-weight E is hung on the pin e, and the counterpoife C is brought back to the mark 300 j and the two together balance noo pounds hanging at b. Therefore a fecond fcale is begun on the fide of the arm, and continued as far out as the firfi, and therefore its extremity marks 2000; that is, the coun¬ terpoife C at 2000 and the eke-weight E at e balance 2000 hanging at b. 2. To continue the fcale beyond 2000, the load mull be hung on the inner pin c. The eke-weight E is taken off, and the eke-weight D is hung on its pin d. The general counterpoife being now brought clofe to the Iheers, it, together with the weight D at d, balance 2000 pounds hanging at c. A fcale is therefore begun on one of the inclined planes a-top, and continued out to 4000, which falls very near to the pin d, each hun¬ dred pounds occupying about five inches on the arm. To complete the fcale, hang on the eke-weight E on its pin e, and bring back the counterpoife to the fheers, and the three together balance 3800 hanging at c. There¬ fore when the counterpoife is now Hid out to 4000, it muft complete the balance with 5800 hanging at c. It required a little confideration to find out what proportion of the three weights C, D, and E, would make the repetitions of the fcale extend as far as pof- fible, having very little of it expreffed twice, or upon two fcales, as is the cafe here. We fee that the fpace correfponding to a fingle pound is a very fenfible quan¬ tity on both fcales, being one-ninth of an inch on the firft two fcales, and one-twentieth on the laft two. This very ponderous machine, with its maffy weights, cannot be eafily managed without fome afliftance from mechanics. It is extremely proper to have it fufcep- tible of motion out and in, that it may be protefted from the weather, which would foon deftroy it by ruft. The contrivance here is very effectual, and abundantly iimple. When the ftcel-yard is not in ufe, it is fupported at one end by the iron rod F, into which the upper end of the {beers is hooked. The upper end of this rod has a ftrong hook E, and a little below at a it is pierced with a hole, in which is a very ftrong bolt or pin of tempered fteel, having a roller on each end clofe to the rod on each fide. Thefe rollers reft on twojoifts, one of which is reprefented by MN, which traverfe the building, with juft rooni enough between them to al¬ low the rod F to hang freely down. The other end O of the fteel-yard refts in the bight of a large flat hook 5 1 . . S T E at the end of a ehain W, which hangs down benveen the joifts, and is fupported on them by a frame with rollers H. This is conne&ed with the rollers at G, which carry the ftieers by means of two iron-rods, of which one only can be feen. Thefe conneiff the two fets of rollers in fuch a manner that they muft always move together, and keep their diftance invariable. This motion is produced by means of an endlefs rope HI ZLKVH pafling over the pulleys I and K, which turn between the joifts, and hanging dowm in a bight be¬ tween them. It is evident that by pulling on the part LZ we pull the frame of rollers in the diredlion GH, and thus bring the whole into the houfe in the pofition marked by the dotted figure. It is alfo plain, that by pulling on the part LK we force the roller irame and the whole apparatus out again. It remains to (how how the load is raifed from the ground and weighed. When the fteelyard is run out for ufe, the upper hook E juft enters into the ring D, which hangs from the end of the great oaken lever BCA about 22 feet long, turning on gudgeons at C about 5 feet from this end. From the other end A defeends a long iron-rod SR, which has one fide formed into a toothed rack that is added on by a frame of wheel-work turned by an endlefs ferew and winch Q, Therefore when the hook E is well engaged in the ring D, a man turns the winch, and thus brings down the end A of the great lever, and raifes the load two or three inches from the ground. Every thing is now at liberty, and the weigher now manages his weights on the arm of the fteelyard till he has made an equi¬ librium. We need not deferibe the operation of letting down the load, difengaging the fteelyard from the great lever, and bringing it again under cover. The whole of this fervice is performed by two men, and may be done in fucceflion by one, and is over in five or fix minutes. The moft compendious and economical machine of this kind that we have feen is one, firft ufed (we have heard) for weighing the riders of race-horfes, and af¬ terwards applied to the more reputable fervice of weigh¬ ing loaded carriages. Fig. 5. is a plan of the machine. KLMN is theFi plan of a rectangular box, which has a platform lid or cover, of fize fufficient for placing the wheels of a cart or waggon. The box is about a foot deep, and is funk into the ground till the platform cover is even with the furface. In the middle of the box is an iron lever fup¬ ported on the fulcrum pin ik, formed like the nail of a balance, which refts with its edge on arches of hardened fteel firmly faftened to the bottom of the box. This lever goes through one fide of the box, and is furnifli- ed at its extremity with a hard fteel pin / m, alfo formed to an edge below. In the very middle of the box it is croffed. by a third nail of hardened fteel g //, alfo formed to an edge, but on the upper fide. Thefe three edges are in one horizontal plane, as in a well made balance. In the four corners A, A', E', E, of the box are firmly fixed four blocks of tempered fteel, having their upper furfaces formed into fpherical cavities, well polic¬ ed and hard tempered. ABCDE reprefents the upper edge of an iron bar of confiderable ftrength, which refts on the cavities of the fteel blocks in A and E,by means • ' oil s T E [ 6S6 I S T E 'Ste'e!-yar<3. 0f two liard fteel ftuds projefting from its under edge, («—formed into obtufe angled points or cones, i hefe points are in a ftraight line parallel to the lide KN of tlie box. The middle part C of this crooked bar is faced Vvith hard-tempered fteel below, and is there formed into an edge parallel to AE and KN, by which it reds on the upper edge of the ileel pin g h which is in the lever. In a line parallel to AE, and on the up¬ per fide of the crooked bar ACE, are fixed two ftuds or points of hardened fteel B and D projeding upwards above half an inch. The platform-cover has four ftiort feet like a ftool, terminated by hard heel ftuds, which are ftiaped into fpherical cavities and well polithed. With thefe it refts on the four fteel points B, B1’, D', D. 1 he bar ACE is kneed in fuch a manner vertically, that the points A, B, D, E and the edge C are all in a horizon¬ tal plane. Thefe particulars will be better underftood by looking at the elevation in fig. 6. What has been laid of the bar ACE, muft be underftood as alfo faid of the bar A! C' E'. Draw through the centre of the box the line abc .perpendicular to the line AE, BD. It is evident that the bar ACE is equivalent to a lever abc, having the fulcrum or axis AE refting with its extremity Con the pin hg and loaded at b. It is alfo evident that but the total prtflure is not changed. If there be now placed a balance or fteelyard at the fide LK, in fuch a manner that one end of it may be direiftly above the pin /m in the end of the lever EOF, they may be conneifted by a wire or (lender rod, and a weight on the other arm of the balance or fteel¬ yard may be put in equilibrio with any load that can be laid on the platform. A fmall counterpoife being firft hung on to balance the apparatus when unloaded, any additional weight will meafure the load really laid on the platform. If a b he to a c as I to 8, and EO to EF, alfo as i to 8, and if a common balance be ufed above, 64 pounds on the platform will be balanced by one pound in the feale, and every pound will be ba¬ lanced by -Jth of an ounce. This would be a very con¬ venient partition for tnoft purpofes, as it would enable us to ufe a common balance and common weights to com¬ plete the machine : Or it may be made with a balance of unequal arms, or with a fteelyard. Some have thought to improve this inftrument by uung edges like thofe of the nails of a balance, inftead of points. But unjefs made with uncommon accuracy, they will render the balance very dull. The fmall de¬ viation of the two edges A and E, or of B and D, from perfect parallelifm to KN, is equivalent to a broad furfaee equal to the whole deviation. We imagine that, with no 'extraordinary care, the machine may be made to weigh within -j-— of the truth, which is ex- aft enough for any purpofe in commerce. It is neceflary that the points be attached to the tsars. Some have put the points at A and E in the 4 blocks of fteel faftened to the bottom, becaule the cavi- Steel-yard; ty there lodged water or dirt, which foon deftroyed Steele. tile inftrument with ruft. But this oecafions a change l"”' A'-’''1 of proportion in the firft lever by any fliifling of the crooked bars j and this will frequently happen w hen tho wheels of a loaded cart are puflied on the platform. The cavity in the fteel ftud Ihould have a little run round it, and it ftiould be kept full of oil. In a nice machine a quarter of an inch of quickfilver would eftbc-. tually prevent all theie inconveniences. The fimpleft and mold economical form of this ma¬ chine is to have no balance or fecond fteelyard ; but to make the firft fteelyard EOF a lever of the firft kind, viz. having the fulcrum between O and F, and allow it to projeft far beyond the box. The long or outward arm of this lever is then divided into a fcaleof weights, commencing at the fide of the box. A coun¬ terpoife muft be chofen, fuch as will, when at the begin¬ ning of the feale, balance the fmalleft load that will probably be examined. It will be convenient to carry on this feale by means of eke-weights hung on at the extremity of the lever, and to ufe but one moveable weight. By this method the divifions of the fcale will always have one value. The beft arrangement is as follows : Place the mark O at the beginning of the feale, and let it extend only to too, if for pounds ; or to 112, if for cwts.; or to 10, if for ft ones *, and let the eke-weight be numbered I, 2, 3, &c. Let the loweft weight be marked on the beam. This is al¬ ways to be added to the weight fliown by the opera¬ tion. Let the eke-weights Hand at the end of the beam, and let the general counterpoife always hang at O. When the cart is put on the platform, the end of the beam tilts up. Hang on the heavieft eke-weight that is not fuffieient to prefs it down. Now complete the ba¬ lance by iliding out the counterpoife. Suppofe the con- ftant load to be 3121b. and that the counterpoife Hands at 86, and that the eke-weight is 9 j we have the load =986 + 312,= x 298+8. STEELE, Sir Richard, was born about the year 1676 in Dublin •, in which kingdom one branch of the family was poflefled of a confiderable eftate in the county of Wexford. His father, a counfellor at law in Dub¬ lin, was private fecrelary to James duke of Ormond 5 but he was\ of Englifti extraftion : and his fon, while very young, being carried to London, he put him to fchool at the Charter-houfe, whence he was removed to Merton College in Oxford. Our author left the uni- verfity, which he did without taking any degree, in the full refolution to enter into the army. This ftep was highly difpleafing to his friends •, but the ardour of his paffion for a military life rendered him deaf to any other propofal. Not being able to procure a better ftation-, he entered as a private gentleman in tlje horfe guards, notwithftanding he thereby loft the fucceflion to his Irifli eftate. However, as he had a flow’ of good nature, a ge¬ nerous opennefs and franknefs of fpirit, and a fparkling vivacity of wit, thefe qualities rendered him the delight of the foldiery, and procured him an enfigrvs commiftlon in the guards. In the mean time, as he had made choice of a profeflion which fet him free from all the or¬ dinary reftraints in youth, he fpared not to indulge his inclinations in the wildtft excefles. Yet his gaieties and revels did jiot pafs without fome cool hours of refleftion j it was in thefe that he drew no his little treatife intitled m S T 1! Steele. The Chrljlian Here, with a defign, if wc tnav believe himfelf, to be a check upon his paffions. 1 or this pur- pofe it had lain fome time by him, when he printed it in 1701, with a dedication to Lord Cutts, who had not only appointed him his private fecretary, but procu¬ red for him a company in Lord Lucas’s regiment of fu- fileers. The fame year he brought out his comedy called The Funeral, or Grief a la Mode. This play procured him the regard of King William, who reiolved to give him fome elfential marks of his favour ; and though, upon that prince’s death, his hopes were difappointed, yet, in the beginning of Queen Anne’s reign, he was ap¬ pointed to the profitable place of gazetteer. He owed this poll to the friendfhip of Lord Halifax and the earl of Sunderland, to whom he had been recommended by his fchoolfellow Mr Addifon. That gentleman alfo lent him a helping hand in promoting the comedy called The Tender Hujhand, which was acted in 1704 with great fuccefs. But his next play, The Lying Lover, had a very different fate. Upon this rebuff from the ftage, he turned the fame humorous current into ano¬ ther channel, and early in the year 1709, he began to publilh the Tatler : which admirable paper was under¬ taken in concert with Dr Swift. His reputation was perfectly eltabliffied by this w'ork •, and, during the courfe of it, he was made a commiffioner of the (lamp- duties in 1710. Upon the change of the miniltry the fame year, he joined the duke of Marlborough, who had feveral years entertained a friendfhip for him 5 arid npon his Grace’s difmiffion from all employments in J711, Mr Steele addrefled a letter of thanks to him for the fervices which he had done to his country. However, as our author Hill continued to hold his place in the ftamp-office under the new adminiftration, he wifely declined the difeuffion of political fubjeHs ; and, adhering more clofely to Mr Addifon, he dropt the Tatler, and afterwards, by the affifiance chiefly of that fteady friend, he carried on the lame plan, much improved, under the title of The Speffalor. The fuccefs of this paper was equal to that of the for¬ mer ; which encouraged him, before the clofe of it, to proceed upon the fame defign in the charabfer of the Guardian. This was opened in the beginning of the year 171an(l was laid down in October the fame year. But in the courfe of it his thoughts took a flronger turn to politics : he engaged with great warmth againff the miniftry ; and being determined to profe- cute his views that way by procuring a feat in the houfe of commons, he immediately removed all obfta- cles thereto. For that purpofe he took care to pre¬ vent a forcible difmiflion from his poll in the ftamp of¬ fice, by a timely refignation of it te the earl of Oxford ; and at the fame time gave up a penlion, which had been till this time paid him by the queen as a fervant to the late Prince George of Denmark. This done, he wrote the famous Guardian upon the demolition of Dunkirk, which was publiffied Auguft 7. 1713; and the parlia¬ ment being diffolved next day, the Guardian was foon followed by feveral other warm political tra&s againft the adminiftration. Upon the meeting of the new par¬ liament, Mr Steele having been returned a member for the borough of Stockbridge in Hampfliire* took his feat accordingly in the houfe of commons; but was ex¬ celled thence in a few days after, for writing the clofe r os? ] S T E of the paper called the Eng/ijhman, and one of his poli¬ tical pieces intitled the Cnjis. Prefently after his ex- pulfion, he publifhed propofals fur writing the hiftory of the duke of Marlborough ; at the fame time he alfo wrote the Spinfer; and, in oppofition to the Examiner, he fet up a paper called the Reader, and continued pub- lilhing feveral other things in the fame fpirit till the death of the queen, immediately after which, as a re¬ ward for thefe fervices, he was taken into favour by her fucceffor to the throne, King George J. He was appointed furveyor of the royal Rabies at Hampton- Court, governor of the royal company of comedians, put into the commiffton of the peace for the county of Middle fex, and in 1715 received the honour of knighthood. In the firft parliament of that king, he was chofen member for Boroughbridge in Yorkiliire ; and, after the fupprefiion of the rebellion in the north, was appointed one of the commiffioners of the forfeited efiates in Scotland. In 1718, he buried his fecond wife, who had brought him a handfome fortune and a good eftate in Wales ; but neither this, nor the ample additions lately made to his income, were fufticient to anfwer his demands. The thoughtlefs vivacity of his fpirit often reduced him to little fhifts of wit for its fupport ; and the projeft of the filh-pool this year owed its birth chiefly to the projedtor’s neceflities. This veffel was intended to carry filh alive, and with¬ out wafting, to any part of the kingdom : but not- withftanding all his towering hopes, the fcheme proved very ruinous to him ; for after he had been at an im- menfe expence in contriving and building his veffel, befides the charge of the patent, which he had pro¬ cured, it turned out upon trial to be a mere projedf. His plan was to bring falmon alive from the coaft of Ireland ; but thefe fiih, though fupplied by this contri¬ vance with a continual ftream of water while at fea, yet uneaiy at their confinement, {battered themfelves to pieces again ft the fides of the pool ; fo that .when they were brought to market they were worth very little; The following year he oppofed the remarkable peer¬ age bill in the houfe of commons ; and, during the courfe of this oppofition to the court, his licence for adling plays was revoked, and his patent rendered in* effedfual, at the inltance of the lord chamberlain. He did his utmoft to prevent fo great a lofs •, and finding every direfl avenue of approach, to his royal mailer effectually barred againft him by his powerful adver- fary, he had re courfe to the method of applying to the public, in hopes that his complaints would reach the ears of his fovereign, though in an indirect courfe, by that canal. In this fpirit he formed the plan of a periodical paper, to be pub!ilhed-twice a week, under the title of the Theatre; the firft. number of which came out on the 2d of January 1719-20. In the meantime, the eiii- fortune of being out of favour at-court, like other mif- fortunes, drew after it a train of more. During ihe courfe of this paper, in which he had affumed the. feign¬ ed name of Sir John Edgar, he wasmuti ageoufly atta ek¬ ed by Mr DeKnis, the noted critic, in a very -abnfive pamphlet, entitled The Character and Con duel of Sir John Edgar. To this infult our author made a proper reply in the Theatre. While he was ftruggling with all his might to favc himfelf from ruin, he found time to turn his pen againlt the mifehievous South fea fcheme, which had nearly brought Steele. S T E ^ [6! Sieele brouglit the nation to ruin in 17205 and. the next year 11 he was reftored to his oface and authority in the play- Steermg- houfe in Drury Lane. Of this it was not long before ^ ' he made an additional advantage, by bringing his ce¬ lebrated comedy called the Confcious Lovers upon that itage, where it was afted with prodigious fuccefsj lo that the receipt there muft have been very confiderable, befides the profits accruing by the fale of the copy, and a purfe of 500I. given to him by the king, to whom he dedicated it. Yet notwithftanding thele ample ii.p- plies, about the year following being reduced to the utmoft extremity, he fold his (hare in the play-houfe j and foon after commenced a lavv-fuit with the managers, which in 1726 was decided againft him. Having now again, for the laft time, brought his fortune by the moft heedlefs profufion, into a defperate condition, he wras rendered altogether incapable of retrieving the lofs, by being feized with a paralytic diforder, which greatly im¬ paired his underffanding. In thefe unhappy circum- itances, he retired to his feat at Languanor near Caer- marthen in Wales, where he died on the 2lft of Sep¬ tember 1729, and was privately interred, according to his own defire, in the church of Caermarthen. Among his papers were found the manuferipts of twTo plays, one called The Gentlemen, founded upon the Eunuch of Te¬ rence, and the other intitled The School of A chon, both nearly finifhed. Sir Richard wras a man of undiflembled and extenfive benevolence, a friend to the friendlefs, and, as far as his circumftances would permit, the father of every orphan. His works are chafte and manly. He was a flranger to the moll diftant appearance of envy or malevolence 5 never jealous of any man’s growing reputation 5 and fo far from arrogating any praife to himfelf from his con¬ junction with Mr Addifon, that he was the firlt who de¬ fined him to diftinguifh his papers. His great fault w'as want of economy 5 and it has been faid of him, he was certainly the moll agreeable and the moll innocent rake that ever trod the rounds of diflipation. STEEPLE, an appendage ereCted generally on the wellern end of churches, to hold the bells. Steeples are denominated from their form, either fpires or towers: the firll are fuch as afeend continually diminilhingeither conically or pyramidally 5 the latter are mere parallelo- pipeds, and are covered a-top platform-like. STEERAGE, on board a fhip, that part of the ihip next below the quarter-deck, before the bulk-head of the great cabin, where the lleerfman Hands, in moil {hips of war. See Steering. STEERING, i,n Navigation, the art of direfting the (hip’s way by the movements of the helm 5 or of applying its efforts to regulate her courfe when fire ad¬ vances. The perfeftion of fleering confills in a vigilant at¬ tention to the motion of the (hip’s head, fo as to check every deviation from the line of her courfe in the firll inftant of its motion*, and in applying as little of the power of the helm as poflible. By this fire will run more uniformly in a llraight path, as declining lefs to the right and left 5 rvhereas, if a greater eftort of the helm is employed, it will produce a greater declination from the courfe, and not only increafe the difficulty of fleering, but alfo make a crooked and irregular track through the water. See Helm.—The helmfman thould diligently watch the movements of the head by 8 ] S T E the land, clouds, moon, or liars5 becaufe, although Steering- ■ the courfe is in general regulated by the compafs, yet Steevec., ^ the vibrations of the needle are not fo quickly per- ^ ceived as the (allies of the (hip’s head to the right or left, which, if not immediately reltrained, will acquire additional velocity in every inllant of their motion, and demand a more powerful impulfe of the helm to re¬ duce them 5 the application of which will operate to turn her head as far on the contrary fide of her courfe. —The phrafes ufed in fleering a Ihip vary according to the relation of the wind to her courfe. Thus, if the wind is fair or large, the phrafes uied by the pilot or officer who fuperintends the fleerage are, port, Jlar- hoard, and Jleady. The firll is intended to diredt the Ihip’s courfe farther to the right 5 the fecond is to guide her farther to the left 5 and the lall is defigned to keep her exadlly in the line whereon (he advances, according to the courfe prefcribed. The excefs of the firll and fecond movements is called hard a-port, and hard-a-Jlarboard; the former of which gives her the greatell poffible inclination to the right, and the latter an equal tendency to the left—If, on the contrary, the wind is foul or fcant, the phrafes are luff, thus, and no nearer; the firft of which is the order to keep her clofe to the wind 5 the fecond, to retain her in her prefent fituation 5 and the third to keep her fails full. In a fiiip of war, the exercife of fleering the Ihip is ufually divided among!! a number of the moft expert failors, who attend the helm in their turns; and are ac¬ cordingly called timoneers, from the French term timo- nier, which fignifies “ helmfman.” The fteerage is conltantly fuperintended by the quarter-mailers, who alfo attend the helm by rotation. In merchant Ihips every feaman takes his turn in this fervice, being di¬ rected therein by the mate of the watch, or fome other officer. As the fafety of a fhip, and all contained there¬ in, depends in a great meafure on the Iteerage or effeCls of the helm, the apparatus by which it is managed ffiould often be diligently examined by the proper officers. Indeed, a negligence in this important duty .appears almolt unpardonable, when the fatal effefts which may refult from it are duly confidered. STEEVENS, George, the moll fuccefsful of all the editors and commentators of Shakefpeare, was born in the year 1735. We know nothing refpeCling his pa¬ rents, but they appear to have been in affluent circum¬ ftances. Our author received the rudiments of his edu¬ cation at Kinglton-upon-Thames, and had Gibbon the hillorian for a companion at that fchool. From hence he ivent to Eton, and in a few years was admitted a fellow commoner of King’s college, Cambridge; but no mention is made of his peculiar courfe of ftudies. It ap¬ pears, however, that he had little reliffi for the mathe¬ matics, which lead at Cambridge to academical ho¬ nours. On the firll eftabliffiment of the Effex militia,.he accepted of a commiflion; but he fpent the concluding years of his life in almoft total feelufion from the world, feldom mingling with fociety, but in the {hops of book- fellers, in the Shakefpeare gallery, or in the morning converfations of Sir Jofeph Banks. Although not an original writer, we cannot in ju- llice refufe him a place among the firlt literary charac¬ ters of the age, when we confider the workshe illuftrated, and the learning, fagacity, talle, and general knowledge which he brought to the talk. With a verfatiiity oi ta¬ lents, s T E f 689 ] S T E gt2